{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"suc_tomcrosbystr_56","title":"John H. Bates oral history interview, 2009 November 16","collection_id":"suc_tomcrosbystr","collection_title":"Tom Crosby’s Rosenwald School Oral History Collection, 2006-2011","dcterms_contributor":["Crosby, Tom, 1940-","South Caroliniana Library. Office of Oral History"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Union County, 34.68928, -81.61942","United States, South Carolina, Union County, Union, McBeth Grammar School, 34.70708, -81.6176","United States, South Carolina, Union County, Union, Sims High School, 34.70097, -81.6101"],"dcterms_creator":["Bates, John H., 1938-"],"dc_date":["2009-11-16"],"dcterms_description":["In this oral history interview, John H. Bates discusses his educational experiences at McBeth Elementary and Sims High School (Union, South Carolina), the football team and Coach Moorer, his career as a basketball coach at Maryland Eastern Shore and Coppin State University, and a few of his players that were drafted into the National Basketball Association. John Harold Bates was born on December 13, 1938, in Union, South Carolina, one of fourteen children born to Lula Mae and Caldwell Bates. Tom Crosby interviewed John H. Bates in Union, South Carolina, on November 16, 2009. Interview covers Bates' education at McBeth Elementary School (grades 1-8) and at Sims High School (grades 9-12) from the mid-1940s to the mid-1950s."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Tom Crosby oral history collection, 2006-2011","Bates, John 16Nov2009 CROS 032"],"dcterms_subject":["Bates, John H., 1938---Interviews","Sims High School (Union, S.C.)--Football--History--20th century","African American basketball coaches--South Carolina--Interviews","Basketball coaches--South Carolina--Interviews","High school athletes--South Carolina--Union County--History","African Americans--Social life and customs--20th century","African American schools--South Carolina--Union County--History--20th century","African Americans--Education--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews"],"dcterms_title":["John H. Bates oral history interview, 2009 November 16"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.tcl.sc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/tomcrosbystr/id/56"],"dcterms_temporal":["1939/1945","1946/1954","1955/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual Research Purposes Only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: The South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, 910 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208"],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["1 sound disc (52 min., 32 sec.) : digital, stereo. ; 4 3/4 in.;1 audiocassette (52 min., 32 sec.) : stereo. ; 3 7/8 x 2 1/2 in."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_125","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2009-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/125"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nDr. Tom W. Kimbrell Commissioner State Board of Education ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ovember 30. 2009 fr. Christopher Heller Dr. Naccaman Williams . d \u0026amp; Cl k Springdale Fnday, Eldre ge ar Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza Chair 400 West Capitol. Suite 2000 12-1- West Capitol, Suite 1895 Jim Cooper Melbourne Vice Chair Sherry Burrow Jonesboro Brenda Gullett Fayetteville Sam Ledbetter Little Rock Alice Mahony El Dorado Dr. Ben Mays Clinton Toyce Newton Crossett Four Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1019 (501) 682-4475 ArkansasEd.org An Equal Opportunity Employer Little Rocle AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker. P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 [r. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes. Wagoner. Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0 . Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack. Lyon \u0026amp; Jones -1-25 West Capitol, Suite 3-1-00 Little Rock, AR 72201 \u0026gt;tfr. I. Samuel Jones III :-V1itchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard -1-25 \\,Vest Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock Sc/z oo/ District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-cv-000866-BSYI Dear Gentlemen: By way of this letter, I am advising you that 1 am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of November, 2009 in the abovereferenced case. If you have any questions, please fee l free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, [)10.~ Jeremy Lasiter General Counsel UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTER: DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DlVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DlSTRICT PLAG\\IT[FF V. No. -l-:82-cv-000866-BSM PULASKI COU TY SPECfAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 0. 1, et al DEFENDA0iTS NOTICE OF FIUNG In accordance with the Court's Order of December I 0, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADEs Project Management Tool for November, 2009. BY: Respectfully Submitted, DUSTIN McDANIEL Attorney General ere y L siter, General Counsel Ark. Bar 'o. 2001-2005 Arkansas Department of Education CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeremy Lasiter, certify that on November 30, 2009. I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail. postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday. Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark -WO \\Vest Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock. AR 72201-3-t93 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock. AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203- 15 l 0 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones -t25 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard -t25 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~ cA~ efYasiter IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DEC 2 - 2009 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PLAINTIFFS OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Basecr-c,~fb\ne-~n 9rrt,'aH~11 a~i a~fe ~ft\u0026gt;~~ci,b~f. 317,2?9_9,,'!~e ~gfec!lc(i~ated.the .Stat~ f ound_at19r:vf undtng for FY 09/10,, subJect' to penod19 adJllstments} 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 1 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Bas~ci .on the !nfo, ~ila~leat,!)ptqh_er.,3f,_\"20Q9, t_ -  : . Jqr F): Q,91Q, subject  _ didfY,st ents. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. . Actual as of November 30, 2009 On October 31, 2Q09_, d1stnbtfons of State Foun9ation FundLng fQr' FY 09/10 w~re as follows: LRSD - $15)28,454 NLRSO - $S(248,54i'. pcssD ~ $11,718,777 [the a)lotments of State ~oundation fun,ding calculated for FY 09/1 o. at Qdober $1, ~009, supject to p~riogic ,adjustments, were as follows: LRSD '\"$55,837,p7Q NLRSD-' $33,91.1,339 PCSSD - $42,968,852 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2009 for FY 09/10, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2009 for FY 09/10, subject tq p~riodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Based on the informatlon available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2009 for FY 09/19, subject to 12e.riodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Distributions for FY 09/10 at October 31, 2009, totaled $3,995,799. Allotment calculated for FY 09/10 was $14,651,264 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 31, 2009 for FY 09/10, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Distributions for FY 09i10 at October 31, 2009, were: LRSD - $885,982 NLRSD -$1,343,772 PCSSD - $2, 122,802 Jhe. allotments,calculated-for FY 09/10  at October 31 ,- 2009, subject to periodic adjustl)1ents, were: LRSD - $4,429,907 NLRSD - $6,718,858 PCSSD - $10 614,093 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 In September 2007, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 07/08 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 In March 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 In March 2009, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 08/09 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 31 , 2009, the following had been paid for FY 08/09: LRSD - $2,856,471.31 NLRSD - $838,720.38 PCSSD - $2,229,905.22 In September 2009, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 08/09 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 08/09: LRSD - $4,236,159.97 NLRSD - $1 ,300,628.11 PCSSD - $3,482,736.87 In September 2009, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $1 ,389,350 NLRSD - $443,807.63 PCSSD - $1 ,114,952.61 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 . In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001 , paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2009, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 09/10 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001 . The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001 , the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In March 2009, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The total amount was $1,049,584.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In August 2009, 16 new Magnet and M-t9-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,049,584. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q . Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distributron in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. 11 I. FINANC1AL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 09/10. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01 /02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 07/08. 12 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 09/10. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education and the Districts. Then it was filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE . sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97 /98. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was prnvided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring sy$tem to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties .and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11 , 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system tb assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is fina lized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Will ie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. . On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired , the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next . Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasibility study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervIsIon. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD bein~ declared unitary and the Joshua interveners fil ing a notice of appeal to the 81 Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua interveners have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua interveners. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lnterveners filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lnterveners. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lnterveners requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facilities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lnterveners. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lnterveners objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007 allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in fhe special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jacksonville out of the PCSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court approved desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then. Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 25 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that \"districtwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 26 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On January 8, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Mr. Scott Richardson, Arkansas Assistant Attorney General, received a letter in January from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the appeal of the unitary status ruling was \"under active consideration\". Mr. Richardson had sent a letter to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in December asking him to inform the judges of legislative, legal and financial matters that hinge on the panel's decision. The panel had heard oral arguments about the appeal in March of 2008. In another news article, the Attorney General's Office rejected proposals to cap the number of new charter schools in Pulaski County, waive penalties for fiscal, academic or facilities distress, and establish a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. The Attorney General's Office also rejected the request that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. Instead, the office suggested reimbursement based on declining percentage rates, such as 77 percent of desegregation funding the second year, 54 percent the third year, and similar reductions the following years. Other topics of discussion in the meeting included the school choice law and the charter school law. The LRSD has said that charter schools interfere with efforts to comply with desegregation obligations. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 23, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ruling from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Little Rock School District had achieved unitary status was discussed. U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. withdrew from the desegregation lawsuit, and was replaced by U.S. District Judge Brian Miller. The first hearing on the Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit with Judge Miller was scheduled for April 13, 2009. This hearing was cancelled because Judge Miller was involved in a car accident that morning. The hearing was going to be about how far the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts have progressed toward unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 27 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On July 9, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article stated that on May 19, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to schedule court hearings on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 22, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the fmplement~tion Phase activities for the previous _quarter. _Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Pl.annerfor Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant \u0026lt;\ntesegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegr.egatfon case were discussed. One article st~tes that Arkansas Attorn~y ,General Dustin McDaniel has proposed a ,Sev~n  year phase 9ut of state desegregation payments. ~nether article talkd abpat tne first.:cqurt hearing With U.S. District Judge Brian ,Miller on the requestffqr,' unitary sta,tul? by the North Uftle Rock and r::\u0026gt;ulaski County Special scnooJ 9isfricts. The hearing was held on Sept~mber 30. $am Jones, an attorney fpr the Pulaski Special School District, Stephen Jones, an attorney for the North Little Rock Sct,ool District, and Chris Heller, an attorney for the Little R9ck Schgof District, want the state desegregation payments to the three districts to continu~ even if the distFicts are all unitary. John Walker, an attorney for .the Joshua_ lntervenors, told the judg~ th~t an expert should testify on educational achievem~nt in the North Little Rock and Pulaski Special School Districts. He thought the judge was \"influenced\" by the reports he ha9 received from the state. 'Judge Mille~ set Janllc:!ry 11 as a unitary ~tatu,s hearing date fo the North Little Roe~ Schopl District, and January ~5' as a unitary status hearing date for the Rulaskt County Special _School ' District. Th~ next lmplementati6ri Ph,13se Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 7, ~009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 28 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 29 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 8. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under pection IV. E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 30 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impedes desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that .they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 31 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation ,efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 32 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 33 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001 , the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 34 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, a letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, a letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during t,he monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation  Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation , the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lnterveners filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) ' In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua interveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lnterveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lnterveners were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report.  In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PM_T and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the m'onth of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 46 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 47 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 48 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 3, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 49 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On December 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 16, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 11 , 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 8, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 10, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Educ~tion reviewed and approve th~ PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 50 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31 , 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of  the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to -increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VLF. of this report. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2009 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1804","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2009-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2000-2009","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1804"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gych_rogp_089","title":"Matt Towery, 16 October 2009.","collection_id":"gych_rogp","collection_title":"Reflections on Georgia Politics oral history collection, 2006-2010","dcterms_contributor":["Short, Bob, 1932-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Towery, Matt A., 1959","Short, Bob, 1932"],"dc_date":["2009-10-16"],"dcterms_description":["Finding aid available in repository.","Matt Towery discusses his early life including the influence of the Civil War on his family's history. He recalls attending Pace University and the origin of his friendship with Lester Maddox. Towery recalls being an unofficial page for Lieutenant Governor Maddox. He recalls attending the University of Georgia and how that influenced his political career. Towery recalls meeting Jimmy Carter and his tumultuous relationship with Lester Maddox. He weighs in on Maddox's reputation as a racist. Towery discusses meeting Burt Lance, Mack Mattingly, and Newt Gingrich. He recalls his experience with the Conservative Opportunity Society and the Contract with America. He recalls the friendship between Mattingly and Gingrich. Towery discusses his early frustration with the Republican party and the formation of the Campaign for Georgia's future. He also recalls his failed campaign for lieutenant governor and his subsequent friendship with Johnny Isakson. Towery also discusses his relationship with Zell Miller and weighs in on the state flag issue. He recalls helping Guy Millner prepare for debate against Zell Miller in 1994. Towery recalls Newt Gingrich's resignation from Congress and his personal experience working in legislature, at a law firm, and at the family printing company. He also comments on Sarah Palin's presence on the Republican ticket in 2008 and on party politics in Georgia.","Interviewed by Bob Short.","Matthew Towery was born in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1959. While still in elementary school he became an unofficial page for Governor Lester Maddox and continued in an official capacity during Maddox's term as lieutenant governor. He attended the University of Georgia, and in 1980 became a speech writer in Mack Mattingly's successful run for senate. He received a degree in foreign affairs at Cambridge University in England and graduated from Stetson University Law School in Florida. In 1989 with the encouragement of Newt Gingrich, Towery started the Campaign for Georgia's Future, and the next year ran an unsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor. In 1992, he served as Gingrich's campaign chairman for his successful race for the U.S. House of Representatives. Towery won a seat in the Georgia House of Representatives, making him the first Republican to preside over the Democratic House. He left politics in 1997. He was CEO of Color Graphics, a printing company, and sold it in 1997. He then served as chairman and CEO of InsiderAdvantage.com."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection","http://sclfind.libs.uga.edu/sclfind/view?docId=ead/RBRL220ROGP.xml"],"dcterms_subject":["Georgia--General Assembly--House of Representatives","Republican Party (Ga.)","Political campaigns--Georgia","Legislators--Georgia","Conservatism--Georgia","Conservatism","Legislators","Political campaigns","Race relations","Georgia--Race relations","Georgia"],"dcterms_title":["Matt Towery, 16 October 2009."],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://purl.libs.uga.edu/russell/RBRL220ROGP-089/ohms"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection, ROGP 089, Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies, University of Georgia Libraries, Athens, Georgia, 30602-1641."],"dlg_local_right":["Resources may be used under the guidelines described by the U.S. Copyright Office in Section 107, Title 17, United States Code (Fair use). Parties interested in production or commercial use of the resources should contact the Russell Library for a fee schedule."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews"],"dcterms_extent":["1 interview (101 min.) : sd., col."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Maddox, Lester, 1915-2003","Gingrich, Newt","Towery, Matt A., 1959-","Miller, Zell, 1932-2018","Mattingly, Mack, 1931-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_tomcrosbystr_71","title":"Allan From oral history interview, 2009 October 11","collection_id":"suc_tomcrosbystr","collection_title":"Tom Crosby’s Rosenwald School Oral History Collection, 2006-2011","dcterms_contributor":["Crosby, Tom, 1940-","South Caroliniana Library. Office of Oral History"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Union County, 34.68928, -81.61942"],"dcterms_creator":["From, Allan, 1950-"],"dc_date":["2009-10-11"],"dcterms_description":["In this oral history interview, Allan From discusses his educational experiences, the influence of Professor Sims on Sims High School and the broader community of Union County, South Carolina, his Jewish heritage, the origin of his family name and his grandfather's store, I. From's, and its role in the African-American community. Born January 9, 1950, Allan From is one of two children born to Edith and Harry From of Union, South Carolina. From currently resides in Raleigh, North Carolina. Tom Crosby interviewed Allan From in Union, South Carolina, on October 11, 2009."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Tom Crosby oral history collection, 2006-2011","From, Allan 11Oct2009 CROS 039"],"dcterms_subject":["From, Allan, 1950---Interviews","African Americans--Social life and customs--20th century","African American schools--South Carolina--Union County--History--20th century","African Americans--Education--South Carolina--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Allan From oral history interview, 2009 October 11"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.tcl.sc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/tomcrosbystr/id/71"],"dcterms_temporal":["1955/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual Research Purposes Only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: The South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, 910 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208"],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["1 sound disc (46 min., 20 sec.) : digital, stereo. ; 4 3/4 in.;1 audiocassette (46 min., 20 sec.) : stereo. ; 3 7/8 x 2 1/2 in."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_tomcrosbystr_77","title":"Howard Jeter oral history interview, 2009 October 11","collection_id":"suc_tomcrosbystr","collection_title":"Tom Crosby’s Rosenwald School Oral History Collection, 2006-2011","dcterms_contributor":["Crosby, Tom, 1940-","South Caroliniana Library. Office of Oral History"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Union County, 34.68928, -81.61942","United States, South Carolina, Union County, Union, McBeth Elementary School","United States, South Carolina, Union County, Union, Poplar Grove School, 34.63125, -81.54066","United States, South Carolina, Union County, Union, Sims High School, 34.70097, -81.6101"],"dcterms_creator":["Jeter, Howard F., 1947-"],"dc_date":["2009-10-11"],"dcterms_description":["In this oral history interview, Howard F. Jeter discusses his educational experiences at Poplar Grove and McBeth Elementary, being the 1964 valedictorian of Sims High School, Morehouse College years, majoring in political science with minors in economics and French, the Merrill Study Travel Program/ Institute of European Studies, graduate work at Johns Hopkins University, and various assigned diplomatic positions to Africa, including stints as the U.S. Ambassador to Botswana (1983-1986) and Nigeria (2000-2003). Howard F. Jeter was born on March 6, 1947, one of three children born to Emma Mattocks and James Walter Jeter, Jr. of Santuck, South Carolina. Tom Crosby interviewed Howard Jeter on October 11, 2009. Interview covers Jeter's education at Poplar Grove and McBeth Elementary Schools in the mid-1950s and at Sims High School from 1960 to 1964."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Tom Crosby oral history collection, 2006-2011","Jeter, Howard F. 11Oct2009 CROS 040"],"dcterms_subject":["Jeter, Howard F., 1947---Interviews","Morehouse College (Atlanta, Ga.)--Alumni and alumnae--Interviews","Ambassadors--United States--Interviews","African Americans--Social life and customs--20th century","African American schools--South Carolina--Union County--History--20th century","African Americans--Education--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews"],"dcterms_title":["Howard Jeter oral history interview, 2009 October 11"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.tcl.sc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/tomcrosbystr/id/77"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1954","1955/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual Research Purposes Only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: The South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, 910 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208"],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["1 sound disc (33 min., 19 sec.) : digital, stereo. ; 4 3/4 in.;1 audiocassette (33 min., 19 sec.) : stereo. ; 3 7/8 x 2 1/2 in."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gych_rogp_088","title":"Wilie Bolden, 07 October 2009.","collection_id":"gych_rogp","collection_title":"Reflections on Georgia Politics oral history collection, 2006-2010","dcterms_contributor":["Short, Bob, 1932-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Florida, 28.75054, -82.5001","United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Short, Bob, 1932","Bolden, Willie, 1938"],"dc_date":["2009-10-07"],"dcterms_description":["Bolden discusses his early years and his work as a civil rights activist. He provides an overview of his activity with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the Poor People's Campaign, and the Summer Community Organization for Political Education (SCOPE). Specifically, he addresses his work with voter registration drives in Albany, Georgia, the efforts to integrate hotels and restaurants in St. Augustine, Florida, and his role as 'wagon master' for the Poor People's Campaign. Other topics include the events of Bloody Sunday and his relationship with civil rights leaders Martin Luther King, Jr., and Hosea Williams.","Willie Bolden was born in Sumter, South Carolina on December 7, 1938. He was raised in Savannah, Georgia. Bolden served in the U.S. Marines. Inspired by Hosea Williams and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., he joined the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). He was the \"Wagon Master\" for the Mule Train on the Poor People's Campaign, preparing cities for Dr. King's arrival. Bolden was also active in Williams' Summer Community Organization for Political Education (SCOPE), a program designed to recruit white students to help with the movement. In 1972, he earned a master's degree in education from Harvard University. He served with the labor movement from 1973 to 1979. He then worked as the director of personnel for the Atlanta Public Library until 1983. Afterwards, Bolden began serving as pastor of the Pilgrim Missionary Baptist Church in Atlanta.","Finding aid available in repository.","Interviewed by Bob Short."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection","http://sclfind.libs.uga.edu/sclfind/view?docId=ead/RBRL220ROGP.xml"],"dcterms_subject":["Southern Christian Leadership Conference","Poor People's Campaign","Civil rights movements--United States","Civil rights movements--Georgia","Race relations","Voter registration--Georgia--Albany","Civil rights movements","Voter registration","Georgia","Georgia--Albany","United States"],"dcterms_title":["Wilie Bolden, 07 October 2009."],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://purl.libs.uga.edu/russell/RBRL220ROGP-088/ohms"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection, ROGP 088, Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies, University of Georgia Libraries, Athens, Georgia, 30602-1641."],"dlg_local_right":["Resources may be used under the guidelines described by the U.S. Copyright Office in Section 107, Title 17, United States Code (Fair use). Parties interested in production or commercial use of the resources should contact the Russell Library for a fee schedule."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews"],"dcterms_extent":["1 interview (81 min.) : sound, color."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Bolden, Willie, 1938-","King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"Willie Bolden  interviewed by Bob Short \r\n2009 November 7 \r\nAtlanta, Georgia \r\nReflections on Georgia Politics \r\nROGP-020 \r\nOriginal: video, 81 minutes \r\n \r\nsponsored by: \r\nRichard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies \r\nUniversity of Georgia Libraries \r\nand \r\nYoung Harris College \r\n \r\nDate of Transcription:  November 17, 2009 \r\n \r\nBOB SHORT:  Im Bob Short.  This is Reflections on Georgia Politics sponsored by Young Harris College and the University of Georgia Library.  Our guest is Reverend Willie Bolden, who lived through many battles during the Civil Rights Movements alongside Dr. King, an educator, active member of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and a well known citizen of Atlanta.  Welcome, Reverend Bolden. \r\n \r\nWILLIE BOLDEN:  Thank you. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  You were born in South Carolina but made your way to Atlanta through Savannah. \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Right.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Tell us about your early life. \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Okay.  And just before starting, I would also like to just for emphasis say that Im the pastor of the Pilgrim Missionary Baptist Church here in Atlanta, 498 English Avenue. \r\nI was born, like you said, in Sumter, South Carolina.  My parents decided that they did not want me to grow up on a farm and decided to move to Savannah.  When they moved there I was three years old.  I understand from my mom that my dad came first and got a job and then three months later after he found some place to stay, he sent for her and for me and thats how we ended up in Savannah, Georgia.   \r\nI was educated in Savannah.  I developed my Christian beliefs in Savannah.  I grew up in St. Phillip A.M.E. Church. Its now Martin Luther King Boulevard, but when I was a young boy it was West Broad Street.  And its still there.  One of the largest, if not the largest A.M.E. church in Savannah.     \r\nMy involvement in the movement in Savannah came into play -- believe it or not, I was an ex-Marine and I came home and got a job on the waterfront as a longshoreman.  And I said to myself, \"Self, theres got to be a better way to make a living than working on the waterfront.\"  But I didnt know exactly what that would be.  So I ended up being an assistant bell captain at one of the two plush hotels.  In my young days now, there were only two plush hotels in Savannah.  The DeSoto Hilton, and its still there on Oglethorpe Street, and the Manger Hotel.  Well, as the assistant bell captain I made money every day.  So I had money every day.  And my second job was shooting pool.  I was a nine ball player.  And not just your average nine ball player.  I was a real good nine ball player.  As a matter of fact, when I see these tournaments on television today I say, \"Man, if they had that back when I was a young boy Id probably be a millionaire now.\"  \r\nSo that was my other way of making money.  But to get involved the movement, every day at 12:00 -- you could set your watch by it -- Hosea Williams would march downtown.  There was a park right across the street from the hotel where I work.  And there is an Indian Chief statue by the name of Tomochichi.  And Hosea would march two or three hundred people every day, Monday through Friday, and where he got these folks from, I couldnt even imagine.  But he had them.  And he would climb up on Tomochichi and he would talk about the white power structure downtown.  And I said one or two things, \"Either this man is crazy or hes one hell of a organizer.\"  Come to find out he was both.   \r\n Very good friend of mine, but some of the things that Hosea did, it was unbelievable.  But I found out that they were going to try to integrate the hotel where I worked.  And my job, given to me by the innkeeper, was when the demonstrators come downtown you lock the door.  And thats what I did.  But when I found out they were coming this particular day, I left the door unlocked and went downstairs.  And when I did, the group came in, led by Ben Clark, who was one heck of a organizer, along with some other folk, and they just took over the lobby because they would not let them in the restaurant, nor would they let them check in to the hotel.  When they were all arrested then I was summoned to the innkeepers office and terminated that same day.  Now I said, \"Oh, man, you mean to tell me I lost my job.  Man.\"  \r\nBut I lived to find out that that was the best thing that could ever happen to me.  And I say that because that same innkeeper who fired me, before it was over, because I got involved with Hosea and the Chatham County Crusade for Voters and we integrated the hotels and motels and the restaurants in Savannah, and that same hotel where I was fired from, Hoseas wife, Juanita Williams and Ben Clark and myself integrated that hotel.  And I insisted on the innkeeper who fired me to check me in.  \r\n And of course we didnt sleep all night.  We kept in touch with each other.  I wish we had had cell phones back then but cell phones were not the thing.  We could just call from room to room to make sure that everybody was all right.  I slept with the chair up against the door, not only all the other locks, to make sure that nobody could come in.  Didnt feel comfortable sleeping.  I think we all went home when we checked out the next day and went to bed and got some sleep.  But I enjoyed being able to check into that hotel that terminated me.   \r\nNow, how I met Dr. King.  I met Dr. King in a pool room.  The pool room was called Charlie Browns Pool Room on West Broad Street.  All of that now is torn down.  West Broad Street -- Martin Luther King Jr., the street today is nothing like it was when I was a boy coming up.  You had clubs from Broad Street to 37th street in Savannah.  I mean nice clubs.  Because you see, you had the Air Force base there and the Army base just a few miles away.  Ft. Stewart.  All of the soldiers came to Savannah on liberty.  And at the end of Montgomery Street you had Hunter Air Force Base, so all the airmen would come to town.  So, they had to have some place for them to go and so they had a lot of clubs.   \r\nSo Hosea had invited Dr. King to come to Savannah.  And this particular day I was in the pool room playing nine ball and Hosea and his group, along with Dr. King, came in.  And Dr.  King said, \"Brother, you just give me a few minutes; I promise you I wont be long.  I just want to talk to you for a few minutes.\"  Well, right about the time he was asking for our attention I was getting ready to bank the eight ball across side, play the nine ball in the corner, and get paid.  And I didnt want to hear nothing about what this guy was talking about, you know.  So he walked over to me, he said, \"Whats your name?\"  I said \"Whats your name?\"  He say \"Im Martin Luther King, Jr.\"  I say \"Im Willie Bolden.\"  He said, \"I promise you, Im not going to take long.  Just give me a few minutes of your time.\"   \r\nSo I very arrogantly took my pool stick and they had benches around the wall, because if you werent playing you had to sit on the bench out of the way.  So I went over and sat on the bench with my pool stick in front of me and he was talking.  I act like I wasnt listening but I was listening.  And finally, he got through and he said, \"Thank you, guys, man, I really appreciate your time.\"  Well, he invited everybody to come to a mass rally at St. Philip Church that night because he was going to be speaking.  And so when he and Hosea and the crew left I got back over the table, I banked the eight ball cross side, I played the nine in the corner, I got paid.   \r\nSo, later on that night I was home.  Man, Bob, my pockets was swolled up like they had the mumps.  I mean I had a good day in the pool room, right?  So I went home that night to take my bath.  And we didnt have showers like we have today.  I took my bath in a number 310 tub.  Some of the people wholl be listening to this tape would not even know what a number 310 tub is, but thats what we used to wash clothes and everything back during those days.  So I took my bath in my number 310 tub and got dressed up for the evening.  And while I was in the tub, it was strange, because I could hear Dr. King talking about how we were beating each other out of the little bit of money that we had.  When, in fact, the man who was really robbing us was several blocks down the street at City Hall and at the County Commission and in the County Commission Chambers and sitting up in these suites.  And I said, \"You know, I think Ill go hear that guy tonight and see what else hes got to talk about.\" \r\nBut I didnt want the boys to know that I was going to go to the church.  So when I got ready to go, I lived on the corner of Anderson and Burroughs, I walked down Anderson Street to Montgomery Street, which is the street past West Broad.  Then walked up Montgomery Street and back to West Broad Street so I could get to St. Philip Church which sat on West Broad and Hall Street.  And I went in there, people were all -- I know the pastor of that church wished that people were there every Sunday like that --  people were all over the place.  I mean in the rafters, up in the balcony, all around,  standing all around.  I said \"Jesus Christ, all these folks.\"   \r\nSo I just kind of leaned back on the wall and I was listening.  And I watched this guy Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  He had everybody in the palm of his hand.  At will, he picked folk up out of the pew and sat them down at will.  I had never heard nobody speak like that before.  And Im learning on the wall and all of the sudden chill bumps start coming on me.  And I said to myself, \"Self, a man is not supposed to make another man feel the way this man is making me feel.  Thats just not supposed to be.\"  And when he finished, folks started lining up around the wall to go shake his hand.  And I went and got in line and when I walked up to him and I stretched my hand out to shake his hand he stretched his hands out and when our hands met it felt like I had cotton in my hand.  I was scared to give him a real firm confident shake.  I just squeezed his hand just a little bit.   \r\nBut the thing that got me, Bob, was this:  he say, \"Willie, Im so glad you came.\"  Now, I dont know how many folk this man had met, but how could he remember my little ol' Willie name?  And I must admit that it made me feel pretty good, right?  A guy like this remembering me.  About three weeks later Hosea told me Dr. King wanted me to come to Atlanta.  I said \"For what?\"  \"Well, he might want you to talk about working with him.\"  I said, \"Now, Hosea, thats the non-violent movement.  I know yours is non-violent, too, but you know, we dont have folks spitting on us and we dont have folk slapping and hitting on us because we dont have that kind of violent movement.  Only thing happening to us in Savannah was we got locked up, okay? \" And I said, \"Now, Hosea, you know Im an ex-Marine and if somebody spit on me, if they have a lip when its all over with, its going to be a miracle.  Beause Im not letting anybody, I dont care who it is, spit on me.  And Lord knows, you know I aint going to let nobody hit me and I not hit them back.  So, you tell Dr. King that, you know, I cant handle that non-violent stuff.\"  He said, \"Well, I tell you what, Bolden\" -- cause he always called me Bolden -- \"you tell Dr. King yourself.\"  He gave me a flight check, what they used back then.  All I had to do was go out there and sign my name to it and give it to em and get on the plane and go to Atlanta and when I got ready to come back take another check, sign on it, and come back to Atlanta.  He gave me one for going, one for coming. \r\nI came to Atlanta, met with Dr. King at 334 Auburn Avenue.  Thats where the National SCLC Headquarters was located, right on the corner of Hilliard and Auburn Avenue.  His office wasnt nowhere as large as this office is.  I mean his office really was like a little closet, had a very small desk and his chair and had books all around naturally, and one small sofa over on the wall.  And I met with him and he told me that hed like for me to come work with him.  And all that stuff I told Hosea, I could not get it out of my mouth to tell him.  I dont know why.  As a matter of fact, Ill be quite honest with you, I was a bit nervous sitting in there with him.  And I remember him asking me, he said, \"Do you have a Bible?\"  And I said, \"Yes, I have a Bible.\"  And he gave me -- and I still have it -- a book on Mahatma Gandhi, the master of non-violence.  And he said to me, \"Willie\" -- he always called me Willie -- he said, \"Willie, were going to turn this country from upside down to right side up with two books:  one, the Holy Bible and two, Mahatma Gandhi.  Read and study both of them.\"   \r\nIt was three years before I went back home.  I had to have my mom pack up my stuff and send it to me on the Greyhound bus.  Thats how I got involved in the Civil Rights Movement from Savannah, Georgia.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  What was your first experience in the movement after you joined SCLC? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Now, my first experience was to go into town.  Andy Young -- well, at that time, before Andy came it was Wyatt Tee Walker.  He was the executive director.  He and Andy, they all worked closely together.  But primarily, my job was wherever Dr. King was going into a movement, my job was to go in and make sure that the people knew he was coming.  I had to get out, make sure that thousands of leaflets would be distributed, that churches would be notified, that the people in the community knew that he was coming.  My job was to get the town ready for Dr. King.  And I did that in several cities.  That was my primary job.  But I felt like I had more to offer than just making sure that some leaflets and stuff got put out.  You know, I felt like I was a leader in my own right.  I mean even back home in Savannah I was a leader, you know.  And I felt that I had much more to offer.   \r\nAnd I remember saying that in a meeting, I said, \"You know, I can do a lot more than just make sure theres some leaflets.  But anybody can go to town and put out some leaflets.\"  And thats when they assigned me to Hosea.  And Hosea started me with voter registration in Albany, Georgia.  And I went to Albany and I stayed in Albany over a year on voter registrations.   \r\nI had several run-ins with one of the meanest police chiefs youd want to meet by the name of Pritchett.  He locked me up two or three times.  And I remember on one occasion I took some people down to the courthouse to get registered and they wanted us to leave and I told the folk we werent going to leave.  And I was standing up on the -- it had a little, I guess youd call it an edge, going up the steps to the courthouse.  And I was standing up on that because the people could see me as I talked to them.  And he slapped me off the edge on top of a car and I guess he thought that I was going to get up and leave, but fortunately, I didnt hurt myself.  Did more damage to that car than I did myself.  And I got up and went back and stood right back up on that same stump and kept on talking and the people never left.  So he had his folk to lock me up.  And I stayed in jail a couple of days and a lawyer by the name of C.B. King, Slater Kings brother, was the one who came and defended me.  And the guy who went on my bond was a black business man there who owned a beauty supply company called Chapman Beauty Supply.  And he was the one that went on my bond and got me out of jail.  And C.B. King was the one who represented me in court.  And if my memory serves me correctly, I was fined something like $100 for failing to obey a police officer.  But we registered hundreds and hundreds of voters in Albany during my stay there at that time.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Dr. King was also arrested in Albany wasnt he? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Oh yeah, he was arrested in Albany.  J.T. Johnson, there were a lot of folk from the movement who were locked up in Albany.  And C.B. King, the one who represented us, even today the federal courthouse in Albany, Georgia is named after attorney C.B. King, in Albany, Georgia.  I went down.  The wife and those and invited me to come down to the ceremony.  And its downtown Albany.  C.B. King Federal Building.  So you see a lot came out of  what we did that the average American dont even know about.  They may have heard the name but I doubt if anybody, well I wouldn't say anybody, but there are very few people outside of Albany would know that the guy who stood our bonds and fought for us in the courtroom had the federal courthouse named after him.  And he also ran for governor.  He was a guy before his time.  He was a brilliant lawyer.  A brilliant, brilliant lawyer. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  So what happened after Albany? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  After Albany I think my next move was Social Circle, a little town about 30, 40, maybe a little more than 40 miles east of Atlanta.  There was a white teacher and a black teacher who became friends.  Both were females.  And they were terminated, both of them, because they would not sever their relationship and they supported each other, and they were good teachers.  But you know, when they want to find a way to terminate you they will find a way.  So, they found a way and terminated them.  They brought it to SCLC, so I was assigned to Social Circle to see what could we do to get their jobs back.  \r\nSo I went in and started organizing the community along with some other staff from SCLC.  And we stayed there in Social Circle over a good year, because we pulled kids out of school.  We closed the schools down in Social Circle.  And we were marching every day.  The state patrol, they had as many as 20 to 25 state patrols assigned -- they would follow me -- I thought they were my escorts because everywhere I went there were one or two state patrols behind my car.  They knew my car.  They knew when I left.  They would follow me from  Social Circle back to Atlanta.  And they would stop out there on 20, and when my car headed back to Social Circle they would pick me up and follow me.  Well, I didnt mind that because I said \"As long as the state patrol is following me then I dont have to worry about the Ku Klux Klan following me.\"  So, I say \"They dont know it but they are really doing something to help me.\"  So I almost wanted to call them and say look, \"Im getting ready to leave\", so they could come behind me and follow me.   \r\nBut we stayed there for about a year and that particular city received at the SCLC National Convention, they received the Affiliate of the Year Award because of what was going on.  Because not only did it affect Social Circle but it affected many of the other little cities around, like Lincolnton and Washington, all the way over to Monroe.  The movement just started spreading like throwing a rock in the water and you see the ripples going out.  So, it was a catalyst for a lot of other movements in and around Social Circle.  As a matter of fact, thats where I was when Dr. King was assassinated.  I was meeting with the leader and the treasurer and the leadership of the Social Circle Movement at the presidents house when it came over the TV that Dr. King had just been shot.  And I said \"man.\" I mean everybody just stopped. I mean we couldnt do or say anything.   \r\nAnd then they showed a picture.  I shall never forget it.  They showed a picture of Dr. King speaking somewhere and it was like you saw a halo over his head.  And I said then to the group, I said, \"Hes dead yall.  Hes dead.\"  Not knowing that he really was dead.  Because the news was hes been shot.  And sure enough he died.  And I remember getting in my car going to Atlanta, trying to get a airplane so I could go to Memphis and they had cancelled all flights to Memphis, Tennessee.  And I remember calling the office and speaking to Dora McDonald, who was Dr. Kings secretary, and said, \"Dora, I got to get to Memphis.  I got to get to Memphis.  I got to get\" -- she said, \"Willie, they have locked.  They closed down everything.\"  I said \"Well, Im going to drive.\"  She said, \"No, dont drive.  You just need to come on to the office.\"  And so, instead -- Ill never forget.  It was pouring down rain.  I mean it was raining like cats and dogs.  And I remember driving on back to Atlanta to the SCLC office that night.   \r\nBut Social Circle was quite a movement.  And then after Social Circle I went to Pike County in Georgia because they had terminated Dr. Glover, D.F. Glover, who served for many years in Atlanta on the Board of Education as an elected official.  They terminated him.  And the reason they terminated him was because they were going to integrate the schools and Dr. Glover was the principal of the only black high school there.  Pike County Mechanical something Industrial High School.  So, they terminated him because they were going to merge the black high school in with the Pike County High School, which was the white high school.  Now, heres a guy who had been in education almost 15 years longer than the principal at the white high school.  Not only that, he had a doctorate in education.  He had come up through ranks.  He had taught.  He was department chair.  His experience was 100 times more greater than the guy who was there, but rather than make him the principal of that school, they did not renew his contract.  And when they did not renew his contract he got in touch with SCLC and they sent me there.   \r\nAnd I went and we met with them and Im saying, \"On what basis do you have not to renew Dr. Glover contract?\"  And they just played with words.  I said \"You terminated the man.  You fired him.\"  \"No, we didnt fire him.  We just didnt renew his contract.\"  \"Well, if you didnt renew his contract you got to have a reason.  You just cant arbitrarily and capriciously not renew someones contract and not give them a reason why.\" \"Well, we just didnt renew his contract.\"  Thats all they would say.   \r\nSo, what I did, we started organizing the community, organizing the schools.  I pulled all the kids out of school, and we marched every single day in that town for about a month.  Every day.  And we saw where our marching -- we would go downtown to the courthouse, give big speeches -- we saw where we had to up the ante a little bit as we would call it.  So we started marching out to the superintendents house.  And we marched out to the superintendents house.  He lived out on the outskirts of Zebulon.  So we marched out to his house during the day.  And then a student came up to me one day and said, \"Reverend Bolden, maybe we need to do it at night.\"  And I said, \"you know, I never really thought about that.  Thats a good idea.\"  So, we marched out there a couple nights.  But then that got to be a little dangerous because they started throwing bricks and bottles and several people got hurt.   \r\nAnd thats when I invited A.D. King, the brother of Dr. King.  He came to Pike County and he led a march and spoke.  But they never did renew Dr. Glover's contract, but we felt like we won because what they tried to do was to keep the high school students who were qualified to graduate that year not to graduate.  They didnt want them to graduate.  So I got a guy in Savannah -- you probably heard of him -- the only guy I know picket more than Hosea.  His name was Reverend Joseph Boone, Joseph Boone.  I went to him and talked about it and we organized a graduation class for the students who met all of the criterias to graduate.  But the county didnt want to give them their diploma.  So we held our own graduation, gave them our own diplomas, and Bob, every one of them we helped get in college.  Every one of them went on to college and are doing quite well even today.  Okay?  \r\nSo we felt like that was a victory.  Now, the other thing that happened in Pike County was we closed down a canning company.  This canning company had about a four or five million dollar contract with the federal government to make pimentos and bell peppers and all kinds of stuff for the federal government.  And what we did, we organized the picketers with the students.  We picketed the company and when that seemed like it wasnt going to work we started organizing the workers who were the parents of the students that we were trying to help.  And when we convinced them of what we were doing, they came out of the canning company, and as a result, the canning company lost their contract with the federal government.  And they sued me personally for $1.5 million.  I went to Macon, the federal court, and I said to the guy who sued me, \"You know, you would have scared the hell out of me if you had sued me for a $100, but a million five.  Where am I going to get it?  The best thing you can get is me.  Do you want me?\"   And they finally dropped that case.  But that company lost somewhere between three and five million dollar contract with the federal government.  So we felt like we had a victory in Pike County because we were able to get those students into college.   \r\nThen later I was assigned to Marks, Mississippi.  As I told you earlier, thats the only city I ever saw Dr. King literally cry.  And he cried because he witnessed a third world city right here in America.  We were always talking about going to Africa and going here and going there, the third world.  Well, we had one right here in America, a Third World city called Marks, Mississippi.  At that time, it was the poorest county in the nation.  Listed as the poorest county in the nation.  Kids seven, eight, nine, eleven, twelve years old walking around with pot belly stomachs.  You would think that they were there because they were eating too much.  The truth of the matter is they were dying from starvation.  Their teeth just rotting out.  It was nothing to see a ten-, eleven-, twelve-year-old boy or girl walking around with just raggedy teeth or no teeth.  You could almost just reach there and pull a tooth out with your fingers because of no medical care.   \r\nWell, right about that time the Poor People's Campaign was being organized.  And I was asked if I would lead the mule train.  Hosea gave me this assignment to bring the mule train from Marks, Mississippi to Washington, D.C.  Took us 52 days to do it.  I had 16 wagons and about 175 men, women, and children on there.  We left out of Marks, Mississippi.  The  governor of Mississippi directed the state patrol to close down one side of Highway 20 so we could travel through Mississippi.  Got to Alabama, the governor instructed the highway patrol, \"close down one side of Highway 20, 20 East\" so we could continue our journey to Washington.  Got to Georgia, Tallapoosa, Georgia, Governor Lester Maddox was the governor.  A kindergarten drop out.  I almost said a high school drop out but I couldnt give him that much credit.  A kindergarten drop out, who was our governor, came out and met us as we were ready to enter into Georgia and said to me, \"These wagons and mules will not go down 20.\"   \r\nI said, \"Mr. Governor, the governor of Mississippi allowed us to come down 20, the governor of Alabama allowed us to come down 20.  Now you mean to tell me my governor in my home state will not allow us to continue our journey.\"  He said, \"I dont care what Mississippi did.  I dont care what Alabama did.  Im telling you whats going to happen in Georgia.\"  And I said, \"Mr. Governor, its obvious that you dont know me very well.  Oh, were going down 20 one way or the other.  Were going down 20.  He got in his car and left.\"  I understand later on he ordered for me to be arrested.  They came and locked me up, took me to jail.  Andrew Marsette, one of my helpers on the march who knew how to organize, organized the mules and wagons off of 20 and brought them all in downtown Tallapoosa to the jailhouse and said \"were not leaving until Willie Bolden is out of jail.\"  They kept me in jail about six hours and they turned me loose.   \r\nAnd guess what?  We spent the night there, got up the next morning, and we went down 20 East, came off at Ashby Street, which is Joseph E. Lowery right now, to Hunter Street, which is Martin Luther King.  Took a right on Hunter Street to Chestnut, which is James P. Brawley Drive.  Well, Dr. Ralph David Abernathy's West Hunter Street Baptist Church sits right on the corner, at that time.  And we  parked the mules and the wagons over at Clark College football field.  And thats where we spent the time until we got ready to go to Washington.  Dr. Abernathy and the restaurant across the street fed us.   \r\nIt was strange because one of the guys who owned one of the restaurants across the street was a number man.  Okay?  And he had this nice restaurant.  And he found out what we had gone through.  He fed everybody on that trip a steak, baked potato with all the trimmings, all of us on that trip.  I think we stayed in Atlanta a couple of days and then we loaded up the mules, the wagons, put the people on buses, loaded up the mules and wagons on horse drawn buggies, I guess youd call em, and the wagon and we took them to Washington, outside of Washington, and we reassembled everything, the mules, the wagons, put all the people on it, and then we went across the bridge into Resurrection City.  And I must admit, and I think I told you earlier, a few tears came to my eyes when we saw all the folk.  Because they knew we were coming.  And they were out there to meet us.  And they were just cheering us on, you know.  Cheering us on.  And the other folk on the wagon, they were cheering us on.   \r\nAnd I told you earlier, and I didnt put it in here, but I was given a white horse with a saddle.  Never rode a horse before in my life.  But I rode that horse that was given to me as the wagon master.  They called me the wagon master.  And the guy said \"if youre the wagon master you got to act like a wagon master.  You got to ride like a wagon master.\"  And I remember him saying like that movie that came on back during the day, \"Rawhide,\" \"youre going to have to say, Get em up!  Move em out!\"  And I would get up every morning after wed have breakfast and got ourselves together, I would go up to the first mule drawn wagon and Id look and the guys who were helping me would let me know that everybody was ready, and I say, \"Get em up!  Move em out!\" Oh, it was fun.  And the weather wasnt always conducive.  We ran into a lot of bad weather.  But we made it.  But we made it.   \r\nAnd then later on I was assigned to St. Augustine, Florida.  That was quite a task there.  In St. Augustine we were trying to integrate the hotels, motels, and restaurants.  And these movements that Im talking about may not go in sequence but at least youll know what they are because in St. Augustine it was in 1964.  And everyone knows -- if you dont know Ill tell you -- the Poor Peoples Campaign took place in 1968.  Thats when we had Resurrection City in Washington, D.C.   \r\nBut in St. Augustine, as I stated earlier, we were trying to integrate the hotel, motels, and restaurants.  And we were beaten twice a day, because it was twice a day that we would march downtown, march out on the beach, and they would be there ready to jump on us.  And on the weekend they would import the Klan from Florida, Jacksonville, Georgia, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama.  They would have the Klan to come over and they would be waiting for us at the beaches.  So when we got to the beaches and we got out  and they would wait until we got out in the water and then they would come in and jump on us.  And the strange thing about it, the state patrol would be standing up on the banks and they would see them out there and wouldnt do a thing.  Just allowed them to come and beat us.   \r\nBut let me give you just a little bit of information about St. Augustine and then we can move on.  For those of you who may not be aware, Birmingham and Montgomery, Alabama put the 1964 Civil Rights bill on President Lyndon Baines Johnsons desk because of the movements and activities in Birmingham and in Montgomery.  Theres no question about that.  They were the ones who put it on the desk.  He took it and put it in his drawer.  But it was the  movement in St. Augustine, Florida in 1964: those beatings that I just told you about, a man at the Munson Motel throwing acid in the pool and then the next day when we went back and had a six foot alligator in the pool.  We would go in the restaurant and they would bring the coffee and then just pour mounds and mounds of sugar in it.  Or we would order food and they would come back with salt just stacked up and pepper stacked up on the food to the point where you couldnt eat it.   \r\nBut it was during St. Augustine, Floridas movement that Dr. Kings house was shot up.  A family out of New York allowed him to stay in the house in St. Augustine while we were there.  And they literally shot that house up trying to kill him and anybody else who was in there with him.  And because of that movement, Lyndon Baines Johnson took the 1964 Civil Rights bill out, put it on his desk and signed it.  Thats how we got that. \r\nMarion, Alabama.  The night Jimmy Lee Jackson got killed, Dr. King was supposed to go to Marion, Alabama that night because we had just found out that James Orange was arrested and beaten in Marion, Alabama.  He couldnt go.  So he sent me and about five other guys.  I think it was Henry Brown Lee, Big Lester Hankerson, Jimmy Lee Wells, myself, and one other person.  I cant think of who that person is.  But we went there.  We had a big mass rally that night.  And I spoke.  And we were getting ready to march out of the church to  march down to the courthouse and then eventually over to the jail where they had James Orange.  But when we got there the media was all over the place.  And the sheriff and all his folk were there.  But before we could really get the march on the way outside the sheriff summons one of his henchmen to come and grab me.  And he grabbed me up by my jeans and carried me over to the sheriff and the sheriff said, \"Whats your name, nigger?\"  And before I could say anything he took his pistol and stuck it in my mouth and cocked the trigger back and said, \"If you breathe, nigger, Ill blow your so and so brains out.\"   \r\nNow here I am looking at him and Im trying to say to myself, \"Self, dont breathe.\"  And Im just looking at him and hes looking at me and hes calling Dr. King all kind of names.  \"Dr.  Coon\" and \"you one of these outside agitators who came into town and upset my negro  my niggers.\"  What -- he didnt call them niggers.  \"Niggerettes\"   \"and upset my niggerettes.\"  \"I ought to blow your so and so brains out.\"  And he finally snapped it out and when he did the end of the barrel of his pistol hit my teeth and cracked it.  And then he hit me in the head, busted my  head, and then say, \"Lock your so and so ass up.\"  And they jumped on the marchers and thats the night Jimmy Lee Jackson was killed, trying to protect his mother.  And they took me to jail, along with many others, and as we got to the jail they were taking us upstairs we could see blood all over the floor, going up the steps where they had not only beaten James Orange but they had beaten some other folks who went to jail with him.  So, Marion, Alabama was a tough movement.   \r\nAnd of course, the march on Washington I was fresh out of jail in Savannah.  I had been in jail for about five days.  Hosea had been in jail 55 days.  He refused to come out.  But I came out of jail and helped organized the group that went to Washington, D.C. during the march on Washington.  And of course, as I stated earlier, the mule train was a part of the Poor Peoples Campaign in 1968 when Dr. Abernathy organized Resurrection City in Washington, D.C.   \r\nThen we had a program called SCOPE, S-C-O-P-E.   It stands for  Summer Community Organization for Political Education.  That was another one of Hoseas projects.  That was his baby.  He created it.  And that program was designed specifically for us who worked with him to go north, northwest, in the west to recruit specifically white students to come south to work on voter registration.  Because what was happening in the south was those of us who were of the same hue that the folks were out on the plantation, for some reason or another - I wouldnt say they didnt trust us - but they were a little skeptical about going downtown with us because they felt like we werent able to protect them.  But if the white students would come and say, \"Bob, my name is Susan; Im from the University of Pennsylvania and Im down here working on voter registration, and what were doing, were traveling throughout the county trying to register blacks\" -- we werent saying African Americans then, we were saying blacks -- \"who are not registered to vote, because we know that you have taxation without representation.  We know that you are the last hired but the first fired.  We know that you dont have the jobs that others have.  And with voter registration, we can change that.  So, Id like to take you down to register.\"  And believe it or not, they would go.  They would go on down there.   \r\nAnd we knew that and found that out from the few whites who were working with us in SCLC.  Guys like Al Lango and Willy Leventhal.  They were white guys who worked with us.  And they were getting folks and taken them.  So, Hosea said, \"Well, lets see if we can get the white students from the north, the west, the Midwest to come down to help us with this.\"  And we did.  And we got thousands of them to come.  And we went out in Alabama, in Mississippi, in Florida, in Georgia, and began to register black voters.  And thats when the black voting power really started kicking off.  It was those kind of campaigns that help us, along with Selma, to get the Voters Right Act.  Because once we got the voting right act out of Selma, it made it a bit more easier for us to get blacks registered.  And I say all the time, no Selma, Alabama, no President Barack Obama.  No Selma, Alabama, no Maynard Holbrook Jackson, mayor of the city of Atlanta.  No Selma, no Andrew Young, United States Congressman.  No Selma, no Andy Young, United Nations.  No Selma, no Andy Young, mayor.  No Selma, no Shirley Franklin, Mayor of the city of Atlanta.   \r\nAnd then you can just take it outside of Atlanta and just go all over the world.  We had less than 300 black elected officials nationwide, if we had that many, in 1965.  Today we got over 10,000.  And thats all attributed to Selma, Alabama and the Edmund Pettus Bridge, which Im glad to say I was on it, both times.  The first time, March the 7th, and seven days later, March the 14th.  I was there.  \r\n \r\nSHORT:   Well, tell us about it.  What was it like on the bridge on Bloody Sunday?     \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Okay.  I had been assigned there along with some other SCLC staff members to organize voter registration in Selma.  I think it was about four or five of us.  And at the same time, SNCC was there also working on voter registration.  After Bloody Sunday, we had people coming in and Bloody Sunday was when we attempted the first time to go across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. The sheriff and his posse and state patrol, they beat us back across the bridge.  Now, Dr. King -- youre right -- was not much in favor of the march at first because he wanted to try some other techniques before we march.  But Hosea Williams convinced Dr. King that the march was the best thing for us to do.  So, Dr. King acquiesced and said, \"okay, well march.\"  But the ones who led the march was, the first time was Hosea, John, they were the leaders of the march across the bridge.  And thats when they jumped on us and beat us up and pushed us back across the bridge.  Then we regrouped and went back and thats when everybody -- I mean people came from all over the world.  Because they saw what happened on that first march and all of our sympathizers came.   \r\nAnd prior to that, we had had not only the killing of Jimmy Lee Jackson in Marion, but we had two whites killed right there in Selma.  One was a priest, whose name escapes me at the moment.  I was trying to think about it as I talked, but the name just wont come to me, and another one.  So it was kind of touch and go.  But on that second march we took out across the Edmund Pettus Bridge and we were  protected all the way to Montgomery.  Along the way we had all kinds of celebrities who came and supported us.  Again, Harry Bellafonte, Joan Baez, Peter, Paul \u0026 Mary, Sidney Poitier.  We had all kind of folk who had helped the movement along to come and be with us.  And of course, you know, we reach Montgomery, Alabama, and Dr. King gave the big speech on the steps and someone might ask, \"then what happened after that?\"  What happened after that was SCLC started Voter Registration Campaigns all across the country.  All across the country.   \r\nAnd even some small towns we started voter registration.  You take in Selma, Alabama, where there was not one black elected official.  There are now.  And so, not only did we target large cities, but we targeted small cities.  If you remember, Carl Stokes in Cleveland, Ohio, the first black mayor of a major city.  And right after him in Gary, Indiana, Hatcher in Gary, Indiana where SCLC played a major role in getting both of those guys because Dr. King sent staff in to help them on their campaign.  So all these cities where you see blacks serving in elected positions, they have to thank the Selma Movement.  And those who suffered being beaten, and even after we got the 1965 Voters Right Act, there were still some cities, and not all of them small cities, where we had a problem getting blacks registered to vote by the administration, by political, by the power structure of those cities, because they knew that once we got blacks registered then we were going to also turn them out to vote and that meant that, hey, they might get caught up in that wheel. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Mississippi.  You led some marches in Mississippi.  \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Well my biggest march in Mississippi was Marks.  And the next one would be Grenada, Mississippi.  Grenada, Mississippi was a violent movement.  Again, and thats why I try to tell young people today.  We were always able to get a movement going and get it started with the young people back then.  We would go into a town and get the young people ready and then after a while we would get the adults.  But the young people were the ones who really started the movement.  And in Grenada, that movement got to be really violent.  As a matter of fact, on one occasion, when the Klan jumped on us and beat us up, we were getting ready to march downtown.  I saw with my eyes a guy take his foot and put it between the crotch of a young boy and took his foot, I mean took his foot by his hand and twisted and broke his leg in two places.  I mean how could somebody take a child and put your foot between their crotch and take your hand and twist and break it in two places?   \r\nAnd there were several people who got hurt that day.  And we went to the hospital in Grenada, Mississippi, and guess what?  They wouldnt wait on us.  They wouldnt wait on us.  They said \"Get out of here.  We cant do anything.\"  Thats when I found out about an all black town on the outskirts of Grenada called Mound Bayou.  I had never heard of Mound Bayou.  Its an all black city, elected officials, everything, all black.  Had their own hospital.  And thats where we had to take these injured folk in order for them to get the services they needed for the injuries that they had.  Grenada was pretty tough.  But weathered the storm.  We weathered the storm.  \r\n \r\nSHORT:  If you were asked what future generation should know about the Civil Rights Movement, particularly during the 60's and 70's, what would you say?  \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  What they need to know about the Civil Rights Movement?  They need to know that what they are enjoying today came at a heavy price.  A lot of people whom they dont know died.  A lot of people whom they do not know have mental and physical conditions today as a result of the Civil Rights Movement of the 60's in order for them to enjoy what they are enjoying today.  And they ought not take what they are enjoying lightly.  I would say to young people, today the question should be what is it that I can do to make sure that this country does not revert back to the 40's, 50's, and 60's.   \r\nAnd then get involved.  Get involved with something.  Get involved with some organization.  Do some volunteer work.  I worked for the Southern Christian Leadership Conference for nine years and the most I ever made was $25 every two weeks.  I was never hungry.  I was never naked.  I was never outdoors where I didnt choose to be on my own.  Because the people who we were helping made sure that we had what we needed.  So you ought to get involved. \r\nSecondly, get an education.  Go to school.  When I came to Atlanta in 1961 there were 125,000 students in the Atlanta public school system.  They have less than 55,000 now.  And the dropout rate among blacks in high schools are higher today than it was in 1961.  In 1961 when I came to Atlanta they had one black elected official on the Atlanta Board of Education.  Now we have six.  The superintendent in 1961 was white.  The superintendent in 2009 is black.  But yet, we have more students dropping out of school in 2009 than we had in 1961.  Somethings wrong with that picture.  Somethings wrong.   \r\nAnd we need young people to get involved so we can make sure that whatevers wrong gets straightened out.  John Lewis and Julian Bond and Dr. King and Dr. Abernathy and Hosea and Andy and C.T. and Fred Shuttlesworth and Willie Bolden and James Orange and Leon Hall and Lester Hankerson, we were young men.  You know, we werent old.  We're old now.  But we were young men when we started out in the Civil Rights Movement.  And thats what we need now.  We need young men. I mean kids are smarter today than my two and a half year old granddaughter came to me the other day and I stretched out in the chair and I felt a charley horse coming in the back of my neck and she got up and came over to me and she said, Papa,  whats the  matter?  Whats the  matter, Papa?  And she went over to her mama and said, Lotion, lotion, and mama put a little lotion on her hand and she came back over to rub  Papas leg.  Two and a half years old.  Kids are much smarter today.  But are they using it?   \r\nWe texting.  And we cant write a full sentence because we text shorthand.  Instead of saying Y-O-U, you just put U so you can get a lot of words in there.  And as a results, when you sit down to get ready to write youre writing just like that -- U.  So cant nobody understand what youre writing. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  What do you think are the most important issues facing African- Americans today? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Education and health.  Education, health, and parental involvement.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  What can we do -- \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  When I was a young man I could not come to my mothers table with no t-shirt on.  In my mamas house, when me and my daddy came to the table we had to have a shirt on.  And the shirt had to be tucked in my pants.  I never saw my daddy in my mamas house with his hat on.  Always took it off before he came in the house.  But I see folks today sitting up in restaurants, the daddy got his hat on backwards, the son got his hat on backwards, the daughter got her hat on backwards.  We have to -- and I know they call it old school but some things we shouldnt throw away.  Some things we should maintain.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Is there a single spokesman for African-Americans today -- \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  No. \r\n \r\nSHORT: -- as Dr. King was in his day? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  No, and I dont think there ever will be another single spokesman for the black community.  And I think maybe the closest person to it today would be our president.  But I cant think of any one civil rights leader who can be identified as the spokesman for the black community.  Now many of them are speaking out on issues that we certainly have some concerns.  Brother Al Sharpton and even Jesse Jackson is a spokesman in his own right.  The National Urban League.  We have a lot of spokesman now, but dont think we will ever have a single spokesman like we had during Dr. King.   \r\nI also think that one of the reason we have a problem in getting the masses of people to get involved like we did in the 60's -- remember, in the 60s nobody had nothing.  Nobody had anything.  You didnt have nothing to lose.  You had everything to gain.  But today folk are living in $3-400,000 homes; they dont want to lose that.  Theyre driving Bentley, Rolls Royce, Mercedes; they dont want to lose that.  Theyre wearing Armani instead of J.C. Penney.  They dont want to lose that.  So, they are ready to send you a few dollars so you can do it, but in terms of them doing it, theyre not going to do that.  But in the 60's, didnt nobody have anything.  So, it was much easier to organize the masses of folk because we all were in the same shape.  Even with the churches, you know, you got the mega churches, with exception of maybe one, you dont see them on the picket line.  They will speak out and theyll write you a check.  But what you really need is their bodies, you see. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  The SCLC is in existence today.  What now is its main focus? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Well, I wish I could tell you that.  I cant tell you what their main focus is.  I think right now SCLC, because it is trying to get a president, and its hard for SCLC to get focused right now because they dont have a leader.  But I think once the leader has been selected and that leader gets his or her cabinet in place and then they can do what Dr. King and Reverend Abernathy and Fred Shuttlesworth and others do what they did.  But I just dont think they are really focused right now, and really focused.   \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Well I appreciate you being with us.  Id like to ask you one final question. \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Okay. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Have we overlooked anything in your career that youd like to mention? \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Well, no, except I always make it clear that I worked with Dr. King and I loved him and I could have taken that bullet for him -- I really mean it -- some folks say it and just because it sounds good.  But if I could have taken that bullet for Dr. King I would have taken it.  I loved him that much.   \r\nBut my real hero, my real hero -- I have two.  And they are my mother and my father.  My mother gave me the fight thats in me because thats the way she was.  My mom was president of PTA in my elementary school and then when I got promoted to middle school, they called it junior high back then, she was elected president of the PTA.  And the elementary school would not let her resign.  So she ended up being president of the elementary school PTA and the junior high PTA because she was a fighter.  She was a organizer.  She liked to get things done.  My dad, on the other hand, I got my work ethics from.  My daddy taught me the importance of having a job, working, taking care of your family.  He taught me about time.  He said if youre on time youre late.  If youre on time youre late.   \r\nSo I always have a problem, even at the church where I left and the church here, our Sunday morning worship service starts at 11:00.  Im not coming in the pulpit at 11 or five after 11.  Im there before 11.  Im there while the deacons are having devotion so when they finish and turn it over to me well have a smooth transition.  We can move on.  Like today, I knew I was supposed to meet you at 11:00.  I left home early enough in case I ran into traffic and had to detour where I could be here.  I think I got here what?  About 10:35, 10:30, 10:35. \r\n \r\nSHORT: Yeah, you were early.   \r\n \r\nBOLDEN: Yeah. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  You were early.  \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Because I got all that from daddy.  He was my hero.  Thats the only thing that I would like to add in here, that because of my relationship with my mother and father, I am what I am today.  Dr. King and those just -- and Hosea and Andy and those just helped put the icing on it.  But when I was in the raw it was my mother and father who chiseled me and got me ready.  And when Dr. King and them got me all they had to do was say lets go; I was ready.  Yeah. \r\n \r\nSHORT:  Okay.  Willie Bolden, thank you very, very much.   \r\n \r\nBOLDEN:  Thank you.  And I certainly hope that this interview will be enlightening and help those who will watch it.  Because what you have seen and heard today is authentic.  I didnt get it off the Internet and I didnt read a book.  Everything that I talked about today I witnessed it with my own eyes, and I was there.  And again, thank you, Bob. \r\n[END OF RECORDING] \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n       "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_90","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2009-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/90"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nScon P. Richardson Ass istant Anomey General Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ST ATE OF ARKANSAS DUSTIN MCDANIEL October 30, 2009 REce,veo NOV O 4 2009 OFF/Cf OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING D1rectd1al: (50 1) 682-1019 E-mail: scon.richa rdson@arkansasag.gov Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union ational Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Mr. M. Samuel Jones III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 7220 I RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 BSM Dear Gentlemen: _By way of this letter, I am advising you that I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of October, 2009 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~-~~~ Scott P. Richardson Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street Suite 200  Little Rock, Arkansas 7220 I (501) 682-2007  FAX (501 ) 682-2591 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DISTRJCT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT PLAINTIFF V. o. 4:82-cv-00886-BSM PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRJCT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for October, 2009. BY: Respectfully Submitted, DUSTIN McDANIEL Attorney General k~ SCOTT P. RICHARDSON, Bar No. 01208 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 1100 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 (501) 682-1109 direct (50 l) 682-2591 facsimile Email: scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov ATTORNEYS FOR STATE OF ARKANSAS AND ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott P. Richardson, certify that on October 30, 2009 I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 7220 l Mr. Stephen W. Jones . Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Scott P. Richardson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 ~asec:1 -on the information available at September 30~ 2009, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 99/10, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 1 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Base\u0026lt;:i qh the infoi-m?tion avaITab~ lf'S~ptembei:_ ~O, 2009, thee A DE. calcuiate_d for FY 09/10, ~ubject tq periodic-adjustme!'!_t. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 On September 30, 2009,_distributions gf .Stat~_F_oundation Fur:,_fling \"for FY 09/10 were ?S f()llows: LR$D- $f0,152,~02 NLRSD - $6,165,698 P9ssD- ~7,_812,s18 The 0allotm~nts of State Foundation Funding calc_ulated for FY 09/10 at septembe(30, 2009, subject to petiodic adjustments, were as follows :' LRSD - $55,837,670 NLRSD - $33,91 _1,339 PCSSD - $42,968,852 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2009 for FY 09/10, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 Based gn the inform ation availabl~, tl:leADE falculated 9t SepJei1:)9.er 30, 2009 for FY 99/10, subjeQt -to _period if adJl!stments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Based on the infomiation available, theADEcalcul~ted at September 30, 2009 for FY 0~/10, subjE1ct to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Distributions for FY 09/10 at September 30, 2009, fufaled $2,663,866. Allotment calculated for FY 09/10 was $14,651,264 subject to -periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2009 for FY 09/10, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 PistributionsJor FY 0~11,o at Septemt,er 30,\" 200~, w~rei LRSD -\n, $442,99.1 NLl~.SD - $671 ,886 PCSSD -_$j ,061 ,401 The -ailcitments. calculated- for FY 09/10 at ~eptember 30, 2qp9, subje9t to peri9dic adjuifments, w~re: LRSD ~ $4,429,907 NLRSD ~ $6)18,.85~ PCSSD - $10,614,0\"93 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 In September 2007, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 07/08 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 In March 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 In March 2009, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 08/09 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 31 , 2009, the following had been paid for FY 08/09: LRSD - $2,856,471 .31 NLRSD - $838,720.38 PCSSD - $2,229,905.22 In September 2009, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 08/09 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 08/09: LRSD - $4,236,159.97 NLRSD - $1 ,300,628.11 PCSSD - $3,482,736.87 In September 2009, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $1 ,389,350 NLRSD - $443,807.63 PCSSD - $1 ,114,952.61 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 , school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2Q09,_.p ~pervvork wa~ generated for theflr~t payment iri fhe 09110 sc~qol yea'r'forthe Magnet arid M-to-M tcansportation pr9gram:' 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In March 2009, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,049,584.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In August 2009, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,049,584. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. \\ 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. , Actual as of October 31, 2009 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000.in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97 /98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 09/10. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 07/08. 12 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 09/10. 13 I II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document, . reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education and the Districts. Then it was filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of ' Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in  academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 16 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001 . The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On July 26, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11 , 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11 , 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11 , 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The  Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasibility study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff , from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. 22 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervIsIon. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Will ie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD bein~ declared unitary and the Joshua interveners filing a notice of appeal to the st Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua interveners have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua interveners. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lnterveners filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lnterveners. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lnterveners requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facil ities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lnterveners. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lnterveners objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007 allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in the special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jacksonville out of the PCSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court approved desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p. m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then. Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 25 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that \"districtwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 26 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On January 8, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Mr. Scott Richardson, Arkansas Assistant Attorney General, received a letter in January from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the appeal of the unitary status ruling was \"under active consideration\". Mr, Richardson had sent a letter to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in December asking him to inform the judges of legislative, legal and financial matters that hinge on the panel's decision. The panel had heard oral arguments about the appeal in March of 2008. In another news article, the Attorney General's Office rejected proposals to cap the number of new charter schools in Pulaski County, waive penalties for fiscal, academic or facilities distress, and establish a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. The Attorney General's Office also rejected the request that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. Instead, the office suggested reimbursement based on declining percentage rates, such as 77 percent of desegregation funding the second year, 54 percent the third year, and similar reductions the following years. Other topics of discussion in the meeting included the school choice law and the charter school law. The LRSD has said that charter schools interfere with efforts to comply with desegregation obligations. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 23, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ruling from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Little Rock School District had achieved unitary status was discussed. U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. withdrew from the desegregation lawsuit, and was replaced by U.S. District Judge Brian Miller. The first hearing on the Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit with Judge Miller was scheduled for April 13, 2009. This hearing was cancelled because Judge Miller was involved in a car accident that morning. The hearing was going to be about how far the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts have progressed toward unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 27 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On July 9, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article stated that on May 19, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to schedule court hearings on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 28 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 29 - IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 30 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impedes desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 31 - IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing , if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might  result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 32 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that . might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 33 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001 , the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 34 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, a letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, a letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study.  In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, QOM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the prin_ciples of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation , the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lnterveners filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order rel ieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua interveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lnterveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lnterveners were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approyal. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans ~ere finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of Apri l. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 46 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 47 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 48 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 3, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 49 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) On December 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 16, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 11 , 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 8, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 10, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 12, -2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the monttf of September. 50 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31 , 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2009 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assist~nce and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding tra ining for monitors\nODM on project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. - In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31 , 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2009 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21 , 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. 58 VI.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_169","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2009-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/169"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nc:::?t7o9/0- d-ro p( ~ 1-~, Q - ----------------- Little Rock School District REC,r r:zp.1-=o October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students !fl\\' \\1 2009 FINAL OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIIOTNO RING 1001-CENTRAL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF I PM I WF I WM TOTAL 09 16 12 208 183 11 14 2 0 0 0 108 109 663 10 22 16 211 170 5 5 0 0 0 126 127 683 11 11 11 154 116 4 7 0 0 132 t 102 539 12 7 10 153 101 9 3 0 0 0 0 115 ~ 121 519  TOTALFOR:CENTRAL 56 49 726 570 29 29 3 \"' 2 0 0 481 459 2404 ? 1002-HALL I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 09 0 158 149 21 21 0 0 0 14 12 377 10 3 2 168 167 24 40 0 0 15 16 437 11 3 161 ~~ 113 12 19 2 ~ 0 0 0 14 ~ 14 339 ' \u0026lt;. \u0026lt; 12 116 ' 83 11 13 0 0 0 0 9 5 239 \u0026lt;tfJ?o TOTAL FOR: HALL 5 7 603 512 68 93 3 2 0 0 52 47 c::oo__) loo3-MANN MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 06 6 4 68 87 10 7 0 0 0 62 48 293 07 3 6 79 ~ 69 14 8 0 ~ 0 0 0 60 ~ 50 289 08 5 67 i~ 70 7 7 0 0 0 0 60 ff7I 68 285 - TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS 14 11 214 226 31 22 0 0 0 182 166 867 9) '::, ~ iooS-PARKVIEW I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 09 81 85 13 16 2 0 0 70 41 311 10 0 5 82 72 16 6 2 0 0 65 46 295 11 4 77 .0 64 11 2 2 0 0 0 56 46 263 12 5 4 80 'J 60 6 7 0 0 0 0 70 36 268 TOTAL FOR: PARKVlEW 7 14 320 281 46 31 5 3 0 0 261 169 ~ i1/o 10/1512009 Department of Computer /nfonnation Se,vices Page 1 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL !006-BOOKER I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 30 25 5 2 0 0 0 0 13 10 85 02 0 0 31 29 3 4 0 0 0 0 19 14 100 03 0 0 26 29 2 10 0 0 0 0 23 14 104 04 0 26 0 31 4 1 ~ 1 0 0 15 ~l 18 98 Ab 05 0 27 l'f!} 27 0 0 0 0 0 24 \"' 14 94 ' \u0026lt; K 2 0 29 20 2 3 0 0 0 0 16 16 88 7, TOTAL FOR: BOOKER 2 2 169 161 13 23 2 0 0 110 86 cs69'.:)~ !oo7-DUNBAR MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM I TOTAL I 06 2 0 123 118 6 9 0 0 0 17 12 288 07 4 0 104 ~ 105 5 4 0 ,~ 0 0 0 7 ~ 18 247 08 3 101 \\1 96 2 8 0 0 0 0 13 14 238 g\u0026gt;7/o TOTAL FOR: DUNBAR MIS 9 1 328 319 13 21 0 0 0 37 44 ~ !ooB-FAIR I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM I TOTAL I 09 0 150 169 5 10 0 0 0 0 11 15 361 10 2 0 117 126 9 4 2 0 0 0 4 11 275 11 0 2 67 ~ 85 6 4 0 0 0 6 6 177 12 0 0 97 69 4 2 0 0 0 0 5 4 181 \u0026lt;7/fJo TOTAL FOR: FAIR 2 3 431 449 24 20 2 0 0 26 36 94 !oo9-FORST HTS MIS I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF I NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 06 0 0 103 89 11 2 0 0 0 0 4 14 223 07 2 92 ~ 119 5 4 0 t 0 0 0 9 f 18 250 08 2 5 5 0 0 0 14 \\. 11 220 gj7o 91 90 TOTAL FOR: FORST HTS MIS 2 4 286 298 21 11 0 0 0 27 43 c_iii:5 10/1512009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 2 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1010-PUL HTS MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 06 3 11 64 67 3 6 0 0 71 77 304 07 2 3 54 ~ 68 0 1 (b.. 0 0 75 ~ 71 276 ' 08 3 57 58 0 0 \"ti 0 0 64 49 234 -\u0026gt;/5lo TOTAL FOR: PUL HTS MIS 8 15 175 193 4 7 2 3 0 0 210 197 1012-MCCLELLA I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 09 0 0 150 146 12 13 0 0 0 0 4 8 333 10 0 95 ,~ 97 6 11 0 0 0 0 4 7 221 11 0 101 72 10 2 ~ 0 0 0 3 ~ 4 194 12 0 0 49 ~'- 32 4 0 \"' 0 0 0 2 ~ 4 92 gg4 TOTALFOR:MCCLELLA 2 0 395 347 29 30 1 0 0 0 13 23 (a 1013-HENDERSN MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 06 4 3 107 114 15 10 2 0 0 0 9 5 269 07 116 ,t\\ 105 11 12 2 ~ 0 0 0 8 ~ 8 264 ~ 08 110 '\\j 105 9 23 1 0 0 0 6 11 267 ~J-7- TOTAL FOR: HENDERSN M/S 6 5 333 324 35 45 5 0 0 0 23 24 1015-CLOVR MIS I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 06 2 73 94 19 13 0 0 0 0 3 4 209 07 0 0 79 ~ 97 16 24 0 ~ 0 0 0 1 9'- 2 219 9~ \\ 08 0 86 69 17 13 0 0 0 0 8 195 TOTAL FOR: CLOVR MIS 3 238 260 52 50 0 0 0 0 5 14 @) g,o?c 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 3 of18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1016-MABEL M/S I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 06 0 0 67 \\. 104 12 13 0 0 16 14 228 07 0 0 103 Y\\. 80 10 7 0 0 0 12 5 218 08 4 0 60 100 9 10 0 0 0 0 11 8 202 19\nTOTAL FOR: MABEL MIS 4 0 230 284 31 30 2 1 0 0 39 27 ~ 1017-BALE I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 16 25 3 2 0 0 0 2 50 02 0 0 20 24 8 0 0 0 4 2 60 03 0 2 26 25 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 56 04 0 0 21 () 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 47 05 0 0 27 ~ 18 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 ' 3 54 K 2 21 22 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3 56 p 7 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 20 iJ7o TOTAL FOR: BALE 2 5 138 142 11 22 1 1 0 0 12 9 1018-BRADY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 30 12 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 5 56 02 0 0 13 18 2 4 0 0 0 0 39 03 0 0 18 22 2 0 0 0 0 2 46 04 0 21 ~ 23 3 4 0 :,~ 0 0 0 2 55 05 0 0 18 1\\ 23 4 3 0 0 0 0 5 54 K 0 0 38 26 3 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 77 p 15 11 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 38 11\nTOTAL FOR: BRADY 1 2 153 135 18 23 0 0 0 0 13 20 (35V 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 4 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1020-MCDERMOT I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 12 25 2 0 0 0 0 4 5 49 02 0 0 16 20 4 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 55 03 0 27 22 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 63 04 0 0 21 16 0 ~ 0 0 0 5 45 05 0 29 ~\\ C\\ 15 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 ~ 52 K 2 21 ~ 17 4 2 0 0 0 10 2 60 p 3 20 16 2 4 0 0 0 0 5 6 57 TOTALFOR:MCDERMOT 5 4 146 131 16 18 0 1 0 0 32 28 ~ 73?,, 1021-CARVER I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 25 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 8 19 78 02 3 21 26 4 2 0 0 0 0 11 11 79 03 0 3 23 ~ 19 0 3 0 }. 0 0 10 ~\\ 19 78 04 2 0 24 26 0 f'r)~ 0 0 0 10 ~ 14 78 05 28 11 21 0 0 0 0 0 13 15 80 K 0 17 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 64 p 2 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 toi TOTAL FOR: CARVER 8 8 143 142 8 9 0 0 0 65 92 ~) 10/15/2009 Department of Computer lnfonnation Services Page 5 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1022-BASELINE I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 16 16 11 4 0 0 0 50 02 0 0 16 17 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 03 0 0 12 18 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 04 0 0 13 ~ 21 7 6 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 47 05 0 0 11 11 9 9 0 ~ 0 0 0 1 ~\"\\ 0 41 K 0 0 7 15 7 9 0 0 0 0 2 41 p 0 0 9 14 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 38 \u0026amp;37c TOTAL FOR: BASELINE 0 0 84 112 49 58 0 0 0 3 4 ~ 1023-FAIR PRK I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I p 3 2 36 ~ 36 3 0 0 (),._ 0 0 60 ~ 39 180 TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 3 2 36 r'\" 36 3 0 0 0 0 60 39 ~ 101\" 1024-FORST PK I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 24 32 64 02 2 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 20 29 69 03 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 31 21 65 04 2 2 5 4 0 0 0 \\11 0 0 0 25 30 68 05 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 27 28 71 K 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 28 25 60 p 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 40\n?!.\u0026gt; TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 7 8 33 26 5 2 3 0 0 0 177 176 ~ 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 6 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1025-FRANKLIN I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 25 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 49 02 0 0 33 30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 03 0 0 26 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 04 0 0 20 ~ 18 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~\\ 0 39 05 0 0 25 (ij 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 K 0 0 22 32 0 0 0 0 0 57 p 0 0 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 19 C/\u0026amp;~ TOTAL FOR: FRANKLIN 0 0 158 151 2 5 0 0 0 0 4 3 ~ 1027-GIBBS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 2 0 7 16 0 0 0 0 11 7 45 02 2 0 14 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 10 45 03 5 13 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 45 04 0 11 ~ 12 0 1 1\\-C) 0 2 0 0 8 ~ 10 45 05 2 11 ~l 13 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 8 ' 12 47 K 0 12 8 2 0 0 0 0 9 6 39 p 0 12 11 0 0 0 0 2 6 34\n$:P?. TOTAL FOR: GIBBS 11 5 80 78 5 7 0 2 0 0 53 59 ~ 1028-CHICOT I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 51 64 28 27 0 0 0 3 176 02 0 53 (\n\\ 69 20 25 \\Y- 0 0 0 4 4 177 K 0 69 73 25 34 '1 0 0 0 0 9 ~ 3 214 p 74 66 32 27 0 0 0 6 5 213 (, 11. TOTAL FOR: CHICOT 2 3 247 272 105 113 0 3 0 0 20 15 Cffo\"' 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 7 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1029-WEST HIL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 18 21 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 48 02 0 0 18 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 4 3 46 03 0 0 16 19 2 2 0 0 0 3 3 46 04 0 0 17 f 23 0 1 ~o 0 0 0 0 43 \\ 05 0 0 17 ~ 23 1 l 0 0 0 0 ~ 2 45 K 0 0 17 21 3 3 0 0 0 0 2 -u 10 56 p 0 0 8 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 go11) TOTAL FOR: WEST HIL 0 0 111 129 13 12 0 1 0 0 14 21 UQ.L) 1030.JEFFRSN I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 30 74 02 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 22 16 49 03 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 30 64 04 0 1 6 0 ~ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 ~ 29 62 ' 05 0 0 6 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 22 '.!h 25 63 K 10 4 0 2 0 0 0 29 33 81 p 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 17 39 ,q '/4 TOTAL FOR: JEFFRSN 4 2 46 34 2 2 0 0 0 161 180 ~ 10/1512009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 8 of 18 1032-DODD TOTAL FOR: DODD 1033-MEADCLIF TOTAL FOR: MEADCLIF 10/15/2009 I GRADEi AF AM 01 0 02 0 0 03 0 0 04 0 0 05 0 K 0 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 9 15 10 7 0 0 0 0 4 4 50 10 18 10 10 0 0 0 0 4 53 11 14 7 8 0 0 0 0 7 9 56 9 10 6 4 0 0 0 0 3 5 37 10 12 6 2 0 0 0 0 4 36 7 \"' 12 11 5 0 0 0 0 3 40 p O O 10 15 6 3 0 0 0 0 4 2 40 _____ 0 ___ 3_ __ 6_6_ _ 9_6_ _ 5__6_ _ 3__9_ _ 0 ___ 0 ___ 0_ ___ 0_ __ 2_1 __ 3__1_ ~-3-12--jJ 7 ~ I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 18 20 7 4 0 0 0 0 5 3 57 02 0 0 26 14 4 4 0 0 0 0 5 54 03 0 04 0 0 19 ~ 19 2 10 0 0 0 2 5 58 05 0 21 2 2 ~ 0 0 0 0 4 ~ 0 58 (\\ 0 16 \\l 25 7 0 0 0 0 6 56 K 0 0 21 18 5 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 54 p 0 12 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 38 0 141 134 26 32 0 1 0 0 24 16 G.ii Department of Computer fnfonnation Services Page 9 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1035-M L KING I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 2 39 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 108 02 51 34 0 0 0 0 5 95 03 0 0 43 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 99 04 0 0 52 48 0 2 ' 0 0 0 1 j 9 113 05 0 44 (~ 42 1 t- 0 0 0 0 12 7 108 ~ K 0 0 39 ~ 42 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 91 p 0 0 35 34 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 74 '1 TOTAL FOR: ML KING 1 4 303 309 2 3 2 2 0 0 29 33 ~ ~1 (,o 1036-ROCKFELR I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM I TOTAL I 01 0 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 02 0 0 23 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 46 03 0 0 16 ~ 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 40 04 0 0 19 16 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 1 ~ 2 40 05 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 38 K 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 p 0 2 34 47 3 0 0 0 0 19 13 119 TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 0 3 156 166 4 1 2 0 0 27 24 ~ ~~~ 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 10 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1037-GEYER SP I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 17 11 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 02 0 0 29 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 46 03 0 0 16 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 04 0 0 10 ~ 8 2 5 o,, 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 05 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 ~) 40 qj 3 2 ~ 3 ~ 0 K 0 0 18 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 40 p 0 0 19 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 38 j?7~ TOTAL FOR: GEYER SP 0 0 125 94 12 17 0 0 0 0 6 9 Cfil:) 1038-PUL HT E I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 50 02 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 50 03 2 0 15 ':18 1 ~ 0 0 0 0 9 ~ 14 60 04 2 19 , 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 17 71 05 0 8 13 0 0 0 0 0 18 12 53 K 0 11 16 0 0 0 0 0 15 14 58 -11/. TOTAL FOR: PUL HT E 4 4 70 79 3 2 0 0 0 0 82 98 G42} 10/15i2009 Department of Computer lnfonnation Services Page 11 of 18 1040-ROMINE TOTAL FOR: ROMINE 1041-STEPHENS TOTALFOR:STEPHENS 10/1512009 I GRADEi AF 01 02 03 04 05 K p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I GRADEi AF 01 0 02 0 03 0 04 0 05 0 K 0 p 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL BF BM 32 20 36 16 32 27 16 ~ 26 21 19 26 24 187 BF 39 26 25 23 156 BM 39 41 45 ~ 26 34\n38 23 ' 45 30 32 20 9 217 230 HF 5 5 4 5 5 3 28 HF 0 0 2 4 9 HM NF 6 0 0 4 0 2 ~ 0 4 0 3 3 23 HM 0 0 0 NF 0 0 2 0 1 ~, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 Department of Computer Information Services NM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WF WM 0 4 2 2 0 o K o 6 WF 0 3 11 WM 0 0 1 \\) 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 TOTAL 68 61 70 50 49 61 TOTAL 81 70 74 74 70 68 30 Page 12 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1042-WASHNGTN I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 41 33 0 0 0 3 83 02 0 0 30 54 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 92 03 0 46 41 0 0 0 0 0 91 04 0 0 39 ~ 37 0 b 0 0 0 0 2 0 79 05 0 40 ''1 32 0 3 ~ 0 0 0 0 2 ~ 0 78 't-o ........... K 0 0 45 48 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 99 p 22 30 0 3 0 0 0 0 59 q?\ni, TOTAL FOR: WASHNGTN 2 4 263 275 4 13 0 1 0 1 10 8 ~ 1043-WILLIAMS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 3 5 14 19 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 67 02 3 5 17 16 2 0 0 0 12 12 69 03 6 3 22 21 2 2 \\J.. 0 0 0 16 \"~ 10 83 04 7 7 24 16 0 2 0 0 0 11 \" 8 76 05 2 4 30 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 23 17 91 K 4 12 17 0 0 0 0 0 9 12 56 TOTAL FOR: WILLIAMS 25 25 119 102 6 7 2 0 0 84 71 CMD ~ol 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 13 of 18 1044-WILSON TOTAL FOR: WILSON 1045-WOODRUFF I GRADEi AF 01 0 02 0 03 0 04 0 05 0 K 0 AM 0 0 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 16 25 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 52 8 17 6 0 0 0 0 3 3 38 19 17 0 2 0 0 0 0 41 0 21 ~ 16 2 1 I\\) 0 0 0 0 3 44 0 12 17 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 ~ 0 36 17 26 2 4 V) 0 0 0 0 0 \\ 0 50 P O O 12 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 29 _____ 0 ___ 2_ __ 1_0_5_ _ 12__6_ _ 11_ __ 2__2_ _ 0 ___ 0 ___ 0_ ___ 0_ __ 1_2_ _ 1__2_ ==~ 1\n01T\u0026gt; I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I P 37 ~ 37 2 10 o o o o 5 1/) 1 o 94 TOTALFOR:WOODRUFF 1 37 r 37 2 1 'J O O O O 5 \"-. 10 ~ 11.% r-104-6--M-A-B_-E_L___E_ L -,I_G_R_A_D_E..,.I_A_F--,---A-M---.--B-F--,-B-M--,---H-F-.---H-M--,--N-F-.---N-M-,---P-F---.--P-M---r--W-F-r-l -W-M--,_T_O_T_A_L---,1 01 0 21 19 6 4 0 0 0 0 5 6 62 02 0 0 24 23 6 3 0 2 0 0 5 2 65 03 0 0 22 I\n:) 17 04 0 0 2 6~0 0 0 0 :~: 54 05 0 0 35 ' 32 5 4~ 0 0 0 80 24 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 3 60 K 0 0 22 23 4 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 62 p 0 0 10 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 31 TOTAL FOR: MABEL EL 0 158 152 28 26 1 2 0 0 24 22 (4'14 10/1512009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 14 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1047-TERRY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 5 4 41 28 7 6 0 0 0 0 10 15 116 02 3 5 38 28 2 5 0 0 0 20 13 115 03 3 33 29 4 4 0 0 0 0 10 15 99 04 3 27 ~ 29 4 6 0 0 0 10 12 93 05 2 2 36 35 4 3 ~ 0 0 0 0 8 5 95 K 4 6 28 36 4 8 0 0 0 8 18 113 p 7 4 13 19 4 4 0 0 0 0 3 6 60 1)1- TOTAL FOR: TERRY 25 25 216 204 29 36 2 0 0 69 84 ~ 1048-FULBRIGH I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 6 5 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 53 42 125 02 4 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 41 60 141 03 5 0 12 13 3 0 0 0 0 52 45 131 04 2 9 ~. . 9 3 0 0 0 0 45 tcb3 7 107 05 3 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 39 29 110 K 4 0 16 14 2 3 0 2 0 0 58 73 172\n.i~ TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH 21 11 89 71 7 11 0 2 0 0 288 - 286 ~6 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 15 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL loso-OTTECRR I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 27 29 2 6 0 0 0 0 8 6 79 02 2 27 30 3 4 0 0 0 0 11 6 84 03 2 28 43 4 6 0 0 0 0 4 13 101 04 34 '\\.l 28 2 4 ~ 0 0 0 0 3 ~ 9 82 ' ~,. 05 3 37 \"t) 25 2 8 0 0 0 0 3 4 83 \\J K 0 0 28 22 3 9 0 0 0 0 7 8 77 p 0 17 11 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 5 40 TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 7 7 198 188 18 39 0 0 0 0 38 51 C546' 11/o 1051-WAKEFIEL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 32 32 18 10 0 0 0 0 0 93 02 0 0 35 24 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 82 03 0 0 34 )._ 33 8 9 0 0 0 0 3 4 91 04 0 0 37 \\) 35 11 12 ~ 0 0 0 0 3 2 100 05 0 0 35 26 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 84 K 0 0 26 26 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 78 p 0 0 14 15 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 TOTAFLO RW: AKEFIEL 0 0 213 191 72 67 0 0 0 0 6 17 ~ 1 I 7., 1052-WATSON I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL I 03 0 0 47 56 17 17 0 0 0 0 4 3 144 04 0 0 \"R 43 17 18 ~ 0 0 0 3 L.\\,.) 3. 138 05 0 0 46 I 60 16 6 0 0 0 0 2 3 133 TOTAFLO RW: ATSON 0 0 146 159 50 41 0 0 0 9 9 em--7~/0 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 16 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1703-FELDER ALC I GRADE I AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL Ai~ 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 :9,? 08 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4,/ 09 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 k A'0  10 0 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 r)o~~J\"\nJ CV ~~ \\.-,~7 11 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ,\"\n:) 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL FOR: FELDER ALC 0 13 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 60 1711-HAMIL TON AC I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL lv 06 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ti 07 0 0 11 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 30 qjp\n-\n,6-- - 08 0 0 14 lP 26 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 :1. 4 46 ~ 09 0 0 26 57 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 90 i,.-,,r-~ 10 0 0 29 47 0 0 0 0 4 3 85 ?~ 0\"' o/v t'--er 11 0 0 15 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 qJ,. 12 0 0 3 ~t5 6 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 L\nL o 9~a TOTAL FOR: HAMILTON AC 0 0 100 185 2 6 0 0 0 8 13 ~ 10/15/2009 Department of Computer Information Services Page 17 of 18 Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL I725-AL T AGCY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL .,{~~ 'p'Q'-' 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 )_~~ ~ frtJO,(' 03 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ?~I) rt--~ .( klol 04 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 J\\t? ~ 05 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1'-\\, ,l,t' C} l (! (/ 9 r L.,1) 06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 -? ,~ ,... )Z)?,t7 07 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 vtl) f 1 ~ .\nj,'r\n08 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 09 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 iP \\_f\nJ 10 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ip) 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL FOR: ALT AGCY 0 0 9 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 62 I767-ACC LP I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TOTAL 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 19 ~ 24 0 2 ~ 0 0 0 0 2 48 12 0 55 78 5 4 0 0 0 0 4 ) 14 161 TOTAL FOR: ACC LP 1 0 74 104 5 6 0 0 0 0 5 16 ~~ 811. GRAND TOTAL: 250 244 8,828 8.756 1,007 1,080 40 39 0 2,841 2,813 25,899 \u0026lt; ~lo L 0 13 ..l/3 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 3 ,o ~ ..)~ At+. Aa--~i 0 0 9 -).5 0 0 6 0 0 0 !5 5 G,.\nt.., (01/ IZ-7~ ~,t,(.,.O 5~~/ ~~?77 10/1512009 Department of Computer Information SeNices Page 18 of 18 ,r I Oct 12009 HIGH SCHOOLS B w CENTRAL 1296 940 FAIR 880 62 HALL 1115 99 MCCLELLAN 742 36 PARKVIEW 601 430 ACC 178 21 HAMITLO N/SWLA 215 12 I-ELDER.....- - 47'-t ALT. AGENCIES- 18 4 SUBTOTAL 5092 1605 ~0\n:)1 /t,,c,n MIDDLES CHOOLS CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FORESTH EIGHTS HENDERSON MABEVLA LE MANN PULASKHI EIGHTS HAMITLO N/ SWLA f'E-bf\u0026gt;ER-ALl.. A~ENGIEe SUBTOTAL ELEMENTARY BALE BASELINE BOOKER BRADY CARVER CHICOT DODD FAIR PARK FORESTP ARK FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GEYERS PRINGS GIBBS JEFFERSON KING MABEVLA LE MCDERMOTT MEADOWCLIFF OTTERCREEK PULASKHI EIGHTS ROCKEFELLER ROMINE STEPHENS TERRY WAKEFIELD WASHINGTON WATSON WESTERHNI LLS WILLIAMS WILSON WOODRUFF -Al:.+.-A6ENCIES- -- SUB TOTAL PK~ UNANl!lc!Jlto0taiJl I~ 200 -v,- ruv rr. VlU\\,.I\\Jllb,J 498 19 647 81 587 70 657 47 514 73 440 348 371 407 70 9 9,-.. 2 10 4 3803 1060 3'J'\u0026lt;J/ 1C6J/ 280 21 196 7 330 196 288 33 285 157 519 35 162 52 72 99 59 353 309 7 160 574 219 15 158 112 80 341 612 62 310 46 277 60 275 40 386 89 149 180 322 51 343 17 447 6 420 153 404 23 538 18 305 18 240 35 221 155 231 24 74 15 23 2 8694 2996 '1/ ~ q'-1'/ a~~ 5661 LRSDO FFICIAEL NROLLMENT 2009-10v s.2 008-09 Octobe1r , 2009 Oct 12008 0 TOTAL %BLK B 168 2404 53.9% 1332 52 994 88.5% 819 178 1392 80.1% 1160 62 840 88.3% 791 106 1137 52.9% 573 12 211 84.4% 155 ,_ 6 233 92.3% 202 0-48 '\"'97.9% 59 o._ 22 81.8% 34 584 7281 69.9% 5125 ..!5 ., '/,\":)// 106 623 79.9% 542 45 773 83.7% 620 36 693 84.7% 500 96 800 82.1% 673 61 648 79.3% 555 79 867 50.7% 437 36 814 45.6% 402 3 82 85.4% 58 12 75.0% 20 1 '1 -66,7,9/oi- 28 464 5327 71.4% 3835 ii 'l.. C.J 42 343 81.6% 299 108 311 63.0% 188 43 569 58.0% 334 44 365 78.9% 229 34 476 59.9% 271 226 780 66.5% 517 98 312 51.9% 169 9 180 40.0% 73 25 437 13.5% 69 7 323 95.7% 313 52 786 20.4% 155 29 263 83.3% 235 30 300 52.7% 165 11 432 18.5% 91 14 688 89.0% 511 58 414 74.9% 327 44 381 72.7% 267 60 375 73.3% 276 71 546 70.7% 371 13 342 43.6% 141 11 384 83.9% 321 52 412 83.3% 308 14 467 95.7% 387 118 691 60.8% 419 139 566 71.4% 393 25 581 92.6% 619 92 415 73.5% 344 26 301 79.7% 210 66 442 50.0% 230 35 290 79.7% 245 5 94 78.7% 223 0 25'-92.~ ... 25 1601 13291 65.4% 8725 I 1\n, I 1:l.~I t,.S.7. 2649 25899 67.9% 17685 2009-10-1:\nPK Students ,~ }\"' (?~ /..,n1 111, j, P w 0 941 137 59 49 97 190 27 64 438 102 28 7 14 6 1 0 8 0 1613 555 21 122 104 43 91 41 47 87 57 64 343 71 369 19 4 1 0 0 6 0 1042 448 28 32 23 113 214 44 28 33 170 38 35 190 57 87 90 17 343 19 6 1 519 58 7 29 103 34 331 7 90 12 53 47 82 64 46 54 103 79 158 16 64 9 19 57 7 12 156 118 16 132 23 34 17 92 37 28 155 59 13 34 12 5 7 1 3012 1555 5667 2558 TOTAL %BLK 2410 55.3% 927 88.3% 1447 80.2% 882 89.7% 1113 51.5% 190 81.6% 222 91.0% 60 98.3% 42 81.0% 7293 70.3% 685 79.1% 767 80.8% 632 79.1% 807 83.4% 676 82.1% 851 51.4% 790 50.9% 63 92.1% 20 100.0% 34 82.4% 5325 72.0% 359 83.3% 324 58.0% 592 56.4% 290 79.0% 479 56.6% 742 69.7% 313 54.0% 180 40.6% 431 16.0% 320 97.8% 732 21.2% 271 86.7% 302 54.6% 429 21.2% 613 83.4% 427 76.6% 413 64.6% 376 73.4% 553 67.1% 315 44.8% 394 81.5% 384 80.2% 406 95.3% 693 60.5% 541 72.6% 676 91.6% 453 75.9% 275 76.4% 444 51.8% 292 83.9% 240 92.9% 33 75.8% 13292 65.6% 25910 68.3% LVW-, Ur. - iL - L. ,442 2008-09K -12- 24,424 +18 LEA: 6002050 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 20 1 2 8 K 60 9 7 15 01 54 5 6 19 02 55 11 4 16 03 48 1 9 20 04 60 6 7 20 05 56 8 6 23 ..- Totals l1,.,.,_3s3 41 41 121 w/o PK 333 40 39 113 23.23% 66.01% North Little Rock School District Amboy Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 23 2 3 0 1 0 0 18 4 2 0 0 0 0 17 3 4 0 0 0 0 13 2 3 0 0 0 0 19 5 3 0 0 0 0 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 112 17 20 0 1 0 0 105 16 19 0 1 0 0 10.48% 0.28% 0.00% Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% LEA: 6002053 White Black Grade Total M F M F K  23 3 1 10 01 19 1 2 8 02 14 2 0 4 03 33 1 3 18 04 12 1 0 2 05 25 2 1 12 ? Totals 126 10 7 54 North little Rock School District Belwood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 50 2 3 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002054 North Little Rock School District Boone Park Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 56 2 1 27 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 45 2 0 23 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 so 1 1 30 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 70 2 4 33 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 58 0 2 27 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 62 1 1 33 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 47 3 1 21 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Totals 388 I 11 10 194 169 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 332 9 9 167 143 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002055 White Grade Total M F M K  80 26 30 01 72 22 29 02 77 30 25 03 80 25 29 04 79 29 30 05 80 25 26 Totals 468 157 169 North Little Rock School District Crestwood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat F M F M F M F 9 12 0 1 0 2 0 0 10 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 5 0 0 3 0 1 1 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 1 0 2 0 0 0 12 14 1 0 0 2 0 0 58 67 3 2 5 4 1 1 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 LEA: 6002056 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 19 0 2 10 K  28 1 4 9 01 37 0 2 18 02 29 2 1 11 03 25 2 1 9 04 28 1 2 9 05 23 1 2 6 !'I Totals 189V 7 14 72 w/o PK 170 7 12 62 North Little Rock School District Glenview Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 1 4 0 0 0 0 85 1 3 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002057 North Little Rock School District Indian Hills Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F K V 103 30 38 17 12 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 99 35 36 11 11 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 02 96 38 29 13 12 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 03 94 31 30 12 16 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 98 35 27 10 18 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 OS 98 39 35 12 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /\" n Totals /588 V 208 195 75 79 8 4 7 7 2 2 0 1 0 0 '-.....---\" LEA: 6002058 White Black Grade Total M F M F K 60 25 21 6 01 68 22 25 9 02 77 27 26 10 03 66 24 17 13 04 69 16 28 11 05 76 22 31 5 .,,,,.-- Totals /' 41.6 V 136 148 54 North Little Rock School District Lakewood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 0 1 0 0 8 1 3 1 1 0 0 7 1 2 2 0 0 0 8 2 0 2 2 0 0 16 1 0 0 1 0 0 51 8 9 5 5 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002060 North Little Rock School District Lynch Drive Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 1 3 17 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 45 5 0 16 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 45 5 2 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 36 5 0 16 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 43 1 1 23 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 38 0 1 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 so 1 1 21 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,_ i---, Totals .r297 18 8 133 131 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK --ZS7 17 5 116 114 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 LEA: 6002061 North Little Rock School District Meadow Park Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 19 1 0 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K .,, 29 0 1 16 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 33 4 1 16 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 27 0 2 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 24 1 1 11 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 29 1 0 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 22 1 0 12 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,, h Totals 1'183 8 5 92 70 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK -164 7 5 81 63 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002063 North Little Rock School District North Heights Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 2 2 6 13 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 67 2 3 25 17 10 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 63 6 2 15 16 10 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 75 3 1 24 25 12 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 71 5 6 25 23 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 76 3 4 25 23 9 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 54 2 4 23 14 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .,,,,,.,.- ~ Totals (' 446 / 23 22 143 131 60 65 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK ' ~06 21 20 137 118 54 54 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002064 North Little Rock School District Park Hill Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 20 4 2 3 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 61 11 6 13 13 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 64 7 15 17 9 10 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 54 4 10 14 16 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 41 6 4 9 11 6 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 44 12 3 9 9 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 49 6 8 11 9 9 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Totals ~ 33--3-/ so 48 76 71 so 34 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 313 46 46 73 67 45 32 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 q3 LEA: 6002065 North Little Rock School District Pike View Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 9 7 7 8 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K  59 6 3 21 23 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 66 5 6 24 23 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 so 7 6 17 16 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 60 8 4 22 18 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 66 5 5 30 18 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 53 5 6 13 22 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ----. Totals 394 / 45 37 134 128 22 17 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK -354 36 30 127 120 19 13 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002067 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 248 16 8 100 -~ Totals ,v24s ./ 16 8 100 North Little Rock School District Redwood Preschool October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 107 1 12 1 1 0 0 107 1 12 1 1 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 LEA: 6002069 North Little Rock School District Seventh Street Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 0 0 21 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 58 0 0 27 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 70 0 0 30 39 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 49 0 0 23 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 43 0 0 22 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 59 0 1 28 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 48 0 0 19 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --.... Totals 367 , 0 1 170 191 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 327 0 1 149 172 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., LEA: 6002070 White Black Grade Total M F M F 07 321 91 87 69 08 388 119 108 63 -- Totals '709 210 195 132 North Little Rock School District Lakewood Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat M F M F M F 49 6 11 4 4 0 0 72 12 7 3 4 0 0 121 18 18 7 8 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002059 White Black Grade Total M F M F 06 627 107 108 187 ,,, h Totals r(627 l/ 107 108 187 North Little Rock School District Poplar Street Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 181 25 14 5 0 0 0 181 25 14 5 0 0 0 11 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002702 White Grade Total M F M 07 242 14 10 08 214 10 10 '\\ Totals (456 IJ 24 20 { North Little Rock School District Ridgeroad Middle Charter October 1, 2009 Count Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat F M F M F M F 110 84 11 12 1 0 0 0 78 101 7 7 1 0 0 0 188 185 18 19 2 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002077 White Black Grade Total M F M F 06 10 4 1 3 07 58 4 1 24 08 78 3 3 37 ,/' Totals (146 11 5 64 North Little Rock School District Rose City Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 2 0 0 0 0 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 61 3 2 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002075 White Black Grade Total M F M F 09 853 134 144 251 10 518 102 120 109 -' Totals V1371 I 236 264 360 '---\"\" North Little Rock School District NLRHS East Campus October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 263 27 23 6 4 0 0 153 15 9 2 5 1 1 416 42 32 8 9 1 1 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 LEA: 6002076 North Little Rock School District NLRHS West Campus/Argenta October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 09 121 8 6 73 31 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 142 19 11 69 33 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 654 126 150 158 175 15 17 2 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 638 141 138 144 176 10 17 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 / Totals f/'1555 I 294 305 444 415 31 40 11 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 \\... q7 LEA: 6002000 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 542 36 27 210 214 ?/ K ~ \"120 114 ~ ,,. 207 01 1-740 113 127 225 203 02 -- 709 131 108 204 200 03 ~-686 105 107 222 201 04 ,.,, 720 110 109 218 216 05 ' 681 115 121 190 207 06 637 111 109 190 182 07 621 109 98 203 159 08 680 132 121 178 207 09 974 142 150 324 294 10 660 121 131 178 186 11 654 126 150 158 175 12 638 141 138 144 176 l Totals -9664 1612 1610 2852 2827 North Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian M F M F 17 32 3 1 34 28 v3 I,, 5 36 27 1 4 29 24 7 2 26 17 5 3 25 29 6 6 19 21 3 4 - I I 26 14 5 0 18 25 5 4 20 14 4 4 27 25 7 4 21 13 2 5 15 17 2 7 10 17 8 3 \"') ,,. I ' I 323 303 61 52 Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 2 2 1 1 ( lw/o PK I 91191 15761 15831 26421 26131 3061 2711 5sl 511 101 51 01 01 I I I 33.35% I 5s.1s% I 6.48% I 1.11% I 0.16% I 0.04% I 0.02% I - -~r 0) I - ( ~/l .) L _z__ ...... J~ ~ C I ~3  3 /Vv g J 0 0 D '!i_ov\n\u0026lt;J / () Q ....- :..?-, 0 / 0 ._\n)- \u0026lt;--\u0026gt;.?..~- ?v 0 /t'_3v 3% /? ~ ?, / .-13' 0 0 46 /fv J_:\n} / ,I 0 e) ..??9  0 / /~ d I 0 _:Q_ C.2. 3 -2.s  / 7_ /D ,_ - I D C:,_j ? /3- /3 13  0 :?/ .?t3 I 3 I I 0 '/ V 0 0 V c7 0'1 :5 -:Id\u0026lt;~ \"/o9 --  1/ ~- b)J ~cf ( LEA: 6002050 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 20 1 2 8 K 60 9 7 15 01 54 5 6 19 02 55 11 4 16 03 48 1 9 20 04 60 6 7 20 05 56 8 6 23 ,_ Totals 353 J 41 41 121 North Little Rock School District Amboy Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 23 2 3 0 1 0 0 18 4 2 0 0 0 0 17 3 4 0 0 0 0 13 2 3 0 0 0 0 19 5 3 0 0 0 0 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 112 17 20 0 1 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002053 White Black Grade Total M F M F K 23 3 1 10 01 19 1 2 8 02 14 2 0 4 03 33 1 3 18 04 12 1 0 2 05 25 2 1 12 --- Totals 126 I 10 7 54 11 North Little Rock School District Belwood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 50 2 3 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002054 North Little Rock School District Boone Park Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 56 2 1 27 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 45 2 0 23 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 so 1 1 30 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 70 2 4 33 30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 58 0 2 27 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 62 1 1 33 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS 47 3 1 21 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Totals 388 _,J 11 10 194 169 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002055 White Grade Total M F M K 80 26 30 01 72 22 29 02 77 30 25 03 80 25 29 04 79 29 30 OS 80 25 26 ~r\"\\ Totals ,, 468 ,,,/ 157 169 North Little Rock School District Crestwood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat F M F M F M F 9 12 0 1 0 2 0 0 10 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 s 0 0 3 0 1 1 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 1 0 2 0 0 0 12 14 1 0 0 2 0 0 58 67 3 2 s 4 1 1 11 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 LEA: 6002056 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 19 0 2 10 K 28 1 4 9 01 37 0 2 18 02 29 2 1 11 03 25 2 1 9 04 28 1 2 9 05 23 1 2 6 Totals 189 / 7 14 72 North Little Rock School District Glenview Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 1 4 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002057 North Little Rock School District Indian Hills Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F K 103 30 38 17 12 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 99 35 36 11 11 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 02 96 38 29 13 12 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 03 94 31 30 12 16 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 98 35 27 10 18 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 98 39 35 12 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Totals 588 208 195 75 79 8 4 7 7 2 2 0 1 0 0 LEA: 6002058 White Black Grade Total M F M F K 60 25 21 6 01 68 22 25 9 02 77 27 26 10 03 66 24 17 13 04 69 16 28 11 05 76 22 31 5 Totals 416 I 136 148 54 - North Little Rock School District Lakewood Elementary October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 0 1 0 0 8 1 3 1 1 0 0 7 1 2 2 0 0 0 8 2 0 2 2 0 0 16 1 0 0 1 0 0 51 8 9 5 5 0 0 ' _,I 1 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002060 North Little Rock School District Lynch Drive Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 1 3 17 17 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 45 5 0 16 22 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 45 5 2 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 36 5 0 16 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 43 1 1 23 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 38 0 1 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 so 1 1 21 26 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -h Totals 291. / 18 8 133 131 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? LEA: 6002061 North Little Rock School District Meadow Park Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 19 1 0 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... (_ K -~11 29 0 1 16 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 01 33 4 1 16 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 27 0 2 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 24 1 1 11 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 29 1 0 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 22 1 0 12 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 183 8 5 92 70 14 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002063 North Little Rock School District North Heights Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 2 2 6 13 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 67 2 3 25 17 10 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 63 6 2 15 16 10 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 75 3 1 24 25 12 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 71 5 6 25 23 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 76 3 4 25 23 9 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 54 2 4 23 14 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --r--. Totals 446V 23 22 143 131 60 65 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002064 North Little Rock School District Park Hill Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 20 4 2 3 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 61 11 6 13 13 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 64 7 15 17 9 10 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 54 4 10 14 16 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 41 6 4 9 11 6 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 44 12 3 9 9 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 49 6 8 11 9 9 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Totals 333 50 48 76 71 50 34 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 - /U LEA: 6002065 North Little Rock School District Pike View Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 9 7 7 8 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 59 6 3 21 23 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 66 5 6 24 23 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 50 7 6 17 16 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 60 8 4 22 18 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 66 5 5 30 18 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 53 5 6 13 22 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 394 I 45 37 134 128 22 17 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( ~~~ -r\nJ ~ ~\n)/ --y\n\u0026gt;o,) 7 -PK... ~.J/~ C:Z:\u0026gt; ~ ~9.Y c?j ~/7 3~ - ~-Y? ~.J c:\u0026lt;07 // g- LEA: 6002069 North little Rock School District Seventh Street Elementary October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 0 0 21 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 58 0 0 27 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 70 0 0 30 39 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 49 0 0 23 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 43 0 0 22 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 59 0 1 28 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS 48 0 0 19 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -., Totals 367 / 0 1 170 191 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002070 White Black Grade Total M F M F 07 321 91 87 69 08 388 119 108 63 ~ Totals 709 l) 210 195 132 North Little Rock School District Lakewood Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 49 6 11 4 4 0 0 72 12 7 3 4 0 0 121 18 18 7 8 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002059 White Black Grade Total M F M F 06 627 107 108 187 -- Totals 627 107 108 187 North Little Rock School District Poplar Street Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 181 25 14 5 0 0 0 181 25 14 5 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002702 White Grade Total M F M 07 242 14 10 08 214 10 10 Totals 456 / 24 20 - North Little Rock School District Ridgeroad Middle Charter October 1, 2009 Count Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat F M F M F M F 110 84 11 12 1 0 0 0 78 101 7 7 1 0 0 0 188 185 18 19 2 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002077 White Black Grade Total M F M F 06 10 4 1 3 07 S8 4 1 24 08 78 3 3 37 ---- Totals 146 ,,) 11 5 64 North Little Rock School District Rose City Middle October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 2 0 0 0 0 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 61 3 2 0 0 0 0 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LEA: 6002075 White Black Grade Total M F M F 09 853 134 144 251 10 518 102 120 109 Totals -1371 J 236 264 360 North Little Rock School District NLRHS East Campus October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat M F M F M F 263 27 23 6 4 0 0 153 15 9 2 5 1 1 416 42 32 8 9 1 1 Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 LEA: 6002076 North Little Rock School District NLRHS West Campus/Argenta October 1, 2009 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 09 121 8 6 73 31 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 142 19 11 69 33 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 654 126 150 158 175 15 17 2 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 638 141 138 144 176 10 17 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 - Totals 1555 J 294 305 444 415 31 40 11 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 '-..::::- LEA: 6002000 White Black Grade Total M F M F PK 542 36 27 210 214 K 719 120 114 208 207 01 740 113 127 225 203 02 709 131 108 204 200 03 686 105 107 222 201 04 720 110 109 218 216 05 680 115 121 189 207 ml H ~' -:1 ?-4 ~ 06 637 111 109 190 182 ___., -, 07 .., 622 J 109  98' ,,, ( 204 } 159 - 08 680 132 121 178 207 09 974 142 150 324 294 10 660 121 131 178 186 11 654 126 150 158 175 12 638 141 138 144 176 l~\u0026amp;t.':. I? 79 -~'i [\"5:S Totals 9661 J 1612 1610 2852 2827 ' North Little Rock School District October 1, 2009 Count Hispanic Asian M F M F 17 32 3 1 34 28 3 5 36 27 1 4 29 24 7 2 26 17 5 3 25 29 6 6 19 21 3 4 -4:J...1 (,/ 7, 26 14 5 0 18 25 5 4 20 14 4 4 27 25 7 4 21 13 2 5 15 17 2 7 10 17 8 3 - ?)f 6\"'% 323 303 61 52 Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 2 2 1 1 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT October 19, 2009 Margie Powell, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Powell: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 www. pcssd.o rg (501) 490-6215 RECEwVED OCT2 1 2009 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO RING Attached is a copy of the 2009-2010 October 1 Enrollment Count. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, d~~u.-,/~ Brenda Bowles, Ed. D Assistant Superintendent for Equity and Pupil Services C Sam Jones, Attorney 10/19/09 PULASKI COUNTYS PECIAL SCHOOLD ISTRICT PAGE 1 14:16:34 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 090 Homer Adkins Elem. School PK 25 29 18 15 4 4 95 37/\" Tot. Including PK 25 ~ 29 18 15 4 4 \u0026lt;.._- 22- 56.84% 43.16% Sel!ee 'l'ee, g C .0 ,E. 0 0 f 0 -0 ~ -------- -------- -------- 092 Baker Interdistrict Elem. K 12 13 26 20 8 15 94 1 14 14 26 24 10 15 103 2 10 11 19 19 7 13 79 3 9 15 10 22 7 5 68 4 10 15 17 11 10 6 69 -? 5 11 9 28 16 7 2 73 ~1 School Tot. 66 ,:.-)~-~~-126 ~i 112 49 o()- 56 486 29.42% 70.58% ------) ------ I ------ -------- -------- -------- 093 Crystal Hill Magnet Elem. PK 11 9 6 10 2 2 40 K 27 17 39 41 3 3 130 1 17 18 37 29 2 2 105 2 20 21 40 33 3 3 120 3 30 11 27 33 2 2 105 4 24 30 36 29 3 1 123 5 21 21 31 29 3 1 106 5t7., Tot. Including PK 150 J11 127 216 ,1JO 204 18 3-Y 14 7-29 38.00% 62.00% School 'l'ot. ~ -l.8 210- 194 16 12 689 31-.30 62. 7-0r- -------- -------- -------- 094 Bayou Meta Elementary PK 0 1 6 12 0 0 19 K 3 3 36 33 2 2 79 1 2 0 31 41 2 0 76 2 3 1 21 29 0 1 55 3 2 0 28 30 1 1 62 4 2 3 19 23 1 2 so 5 2 0 21 26 0 1 so t. v Tot. Including PK 14 :J? 8 162 '?fo19L4 f 6 I?\n- 7 ~ 5.63% 94.37% School 'l'ot. 11 7 16 ~ 6- 7 312 5.65% 94. 35%-' -------- -------- -------- 095 Clinton Inter. Magnet Sch PK 12 20 13 28 1 4 78 K 21 40 18 39 7 11 136 1 28 31 27 20 6 7 119 2 32 30 37 21 4 5 129 3 30 32 28 13 6 5 114 4 32 29 18 17 2 2 100 5 31 30 23 20 6 3 113 aoi Tot. Including PK 186 flt 212 164\n-a~ 158 32 l1 37 ~ 50.44% 4 9. 5 6% Sallee Tee l,.:l.4 0 1 3 711 51. 8 48.52 -------- -------- -------- 099 Dupree Elementary K 19 11 12 11 6 60 10/19/09 PAGE 2 14:16:34 #: racecnt 1 2 3 4 5 School Tot. 102 Harris Elementary K 1 2 3 4 5 School Tot. 103 Jacksonville Elementary K 1 2 3 4 5 School Tot. 104 Landmark Elementary PK K 1 2 3 4 5 Tot. Including PK BLACK MALE FEMALE 12 11 13 7 6 68 11 11 6 11 10 60 12 11 14 14 18 16 15 8 9 12 8 12 76\n!tj___~~- 19 23 34 18 25 25 22 25 25 19 32 19 157 JZ~-=~=- 10 14 5 9 14 7 11 70 4 7 8 15 10 9 12 (g5 65 --\u0026amp;8ee1,i..,.,,...,..,ll,-'l'i'\"'e\"'t----- ..,,._,._g _ ...,_ 105 Lawson Elementary PK K 1 2 3 4 5 Tot. Including PK Behoel Tut 106 Tolleson Elementary PK K 1 2 3 2 8 2 4 6 5 10 37 c,i 3e 5 14 10 10 7 1 4 7 7 4 4 4 31 7 5 6 10 17 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA WHITE MALE FEMALE 13 11 12 9 7 64 3 1 3 1 1 0 9 /9 12 15 5 10 4 12 58 12 20 12 11 15 11 12 93 11 6 14 10 10 62 1 1 0 2 1 1 6 11 15 9 10 6 14 65 8 16 14 17 13 13 7 88 ao 9 8 11 18 19 17 10 16 19 21 28 14 17 14 113 71 108 1Q4 12 24 22 13 11 lQQ 10 19 10 14 7 OTHER MALE FEMALE 2 3 1 1 4 17 0 4 0 1 1 3 9 9 5 4 6 6 3 33 6 2 7 4 4 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 2 2 2 4 1 1 5 1 5 3 0 ~\n), 15 2 1 1 0 2 0 /? 6 56 1 5 5 4 4 6 25 0 3 3 2 2 1 4 15 0 1 1 2 0 2 3 9 1 1 2 2 ID PERCENTAGES TOTALS 54 BLACK WHITE 43 51 41 37 ~ 29 35 38 27 44.76% ~: qa% 55.24% 179) 83.24% 16.76% 75 92 73 77 64 86 ?1'6 467) 61.24% 40 62 49 58 58 42 47 356) 316 20 45 46 42 50 55 50 308 37 67 51 50 d-\n7,, 22.08% 38.76% 62.08% 77.92% 10/19/09 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 3 14:16:34 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 4 11 9 12 13 2 4 51 5 14 8 8 4 2 1 37 ~il~ Tot. Including PK 71 ,i3 62 102 ,11 77 16 ~~ 13 Gi) 39.00% 61.00% Soliloel '\u0026gt;'o-\u0026amp;- ------5,a- -~ ---7 14 12 384 39.00% 60.28% -------- -------- -------- 108 Oak Grove Elementary PK 11 13 12 14 5 0 55 K 2 7 19 20 2 3 53 1 4 2 19 11 4 2 42 2 9 3 11 9 4 3 39 3 6 4 17 15 4 3 49 4 8 5 15 17 2 2 49 5 6 3 10 14 3 2 38 dl? .... Tot. Including PK 46 gj 37 103 7J'3 100 24 ~9 15 ~ 25.54% 74.46% -Scho0 0----2--r.\u0026amp;5-% 78.J,5% -------- -------- -------- 110 Joe T. Robinson Elementar PK 1 0 7 7 1 4 20 K 3 4 10 9 1 1 28 1 3 4 12 9 4 1 33 2 2 7 14 12 1 2 38 3 8 7 13 16 2 1 47 4 10 8 8 13 2 4 45 5 7 5 18 12 3 3 48 d7lo Tot. Including PK 34 \u0026amp;9 35 82 ,1.,0 78 14 ~o 16 c.w 2 6. 64 % 73.36% 1.J 2 939 :o-8. 45% 91. 5'1:-o -------- -------- -------- 111 Scott Elementary PK 4 2 8 6 0 0 20 K 6 2 11 9 0 0 28 1 4 2 13 9 1 0 29 2 5 4 6 11 1 0 27 3 6 6 3 10 0 1 26 4 2 4 13 17 0 1 37 5 3 2 5 6 1 0 17 6 1 5 8 5 0 0 19 c:)9/: Tot. Including PK 31 9\u0026lt;t 27 67 ,JD73 3 ~ 2 ~ 28.57% 71.43% 2 183 - -28:'J-2 ,._ 91.58%-- -------- -------- -------- 112 Sherwood Elementary PK 2 0 10 6 0 2 20 K 5 7 14 15 4 3 48 1 8 11 12 22 1 4 58 2 15 9 18 11 2 1 56 3 13 10 15 14 5 1 58 4 12 13 16 17 2 0 60 5 10 20 17 21 0 2 70 ~(,?o Tot. Including PK 65\n~5 70 102 ?? 106 14 d7 13 ~ 36.49% 63. 51% 1,1 350 38 .00%-- 62~00'%- -------- -------- -------- 113 Sylvan Hills Elementary 10/19/09 PAGE 4 14:16:34 ~: racecnt PK K 1 2 3 4 5 Tot. Including PK BLACK MALE FEMALE 4 18 9 14 13 11 17 86 J\u0026amp;1 3 14 9 13 14 13 17 83 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA WHITE OTHER MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE 4 20 16 15 18 16 19 108 7 14 6 9 13 14 16 79 0 2 2 0 0 5 0 9 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 12 TOTALS 19 69 44 52 61 60 72 c:iii) ID PERCENTAGES BLACK WHITE 55.17% -.s~e~h~e~el~~~e~t~.,----- .....B. ~2o-----8-B99---41~Q44----~7~2-----o!t-----'1'-l---~58 44.83% 45.25% 119 Jacksonville Middle Schoo 6 7 8 School Tot. 120 Fuller Middle School 6 7 8 School Tot. 68 69 76 60 84 62 228 -11719 1 63 58 48 57 171 60 so ff?~ 165 122 Sylvan Hills Middle Schoo 6 7 8 School Tot. 123 Jacksonville High School 49 48 59 156 J?\n1 62 64 57 183 89 89 92 63 65 89 9 10 11 12 School Tot. 31 51 -- 277 -~'.,1-~= ~- 125 Wilbur Mills High School 9 10 11 12 School Tot. 126 Oak Grove High School 9 10 11 12 School Tot 65 84 59 48 256 32 19 22 23 96 54 53 54 66 227 20 22 16 i7 75 39 34 64 38 31 45 -- 134 cfi' -==~- 39 35 53 127 51 49 62 162 48 49 62 46 205 48 38 25 28 139 37 15 19 22 93 39 37 33 52 47 59 ~d~-==~- ~,f\n69 59 38 36 202 47 34 25 30 136 24 35 19 26 104 6 10 4 7 1 2 11 _50 19 10 12 9 31 ~/ 5 4 6 15 7 5 4 4 20 10 7 3 4 24 5 1 3 2 11 a3 8 5 7 20 5 5 2 12 4 1 6 3 14 5 11 3 5 24 1 2 4 5 12 226 249 225 \u0026amp;,.\",\nToo) 59.86% 40.14% 217 194 212 224 217 245 686 306 269 264 171 1010 229 227 169 181 .!!_06l 119 94 83 95 -1'7 53.93% 46. 07% 49.42% 50.58% - \"7 . 56.34% 43.66% 59.93% 40.07% ) \"7 ..I  43.73% 56.27% 10/19/09 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 5 14:16:34 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 127 Joe T. Robinson High Scho 9 29 38 39 31 4 2 143 10 36 28 36 35 4 2 141 11 28 20 40 25 3 3 119 12 29 ~ ~ _\n2'j I 23 31 ,J51 22 2 2 109 ,) School Tot. 122 109 146 113 13 d~ 9 --~~ 45.12% 54.88% -------- -------- 128 Sylvan Hills High School 9 60 53 40 45 4 9 211 10 55 46 52 58 6 2 219 11 32 56 45 53 4 6 196 12 36 40 49 50 3 5 183 _,/7/\u0026lt;/ School Tot. 183 ~-{l 195 186 ~'? 206 17 g/i 22 ~ 46. 72% 53.28% -------- -------- -------- 129 Cato Elementary School PK 2 2 9 5 2 0 20 K 7 11 20 22 2 1 63 1 8 8 26 15 1 3 61 2 6 8 9 17 0 0 40 3 10 8 14 19 2 1 54 4 10 6 24 18 0 1 59 /-\u0026gt;\u0026lt;j?I) 5 6 6 20 d 16 3 55 Tot. Including PK 49 (lt 49 122 ~ 112 11 ,\no 9 Ciii) 27.84% 72.16% Sofl osl 4'sb 47 41 ]1 ~8...3'M 71:~w -------- -------- -------- 130 Pinewood Elementary K 24 20 11 14 3 3 75 1 21 21 13 17 1 1 74 2 13 15 12 9 2 0 51 3 17 23 6 13 2 3 64 4 20 17 9 11 4 2 63 5 22 18 12 ~11 ,~1 17 3 3 75 School Tot. 117\nf) 114 63 81 15 d-1 12 QiD 57. 4 6% 42.54% -------- -------- -------- 135 College Station Elem. PK 7 1 4 0 0 0 12 K 12 9 5 3 1 0 30 1 9 10 3 0 1 0 23 2 9 8 3 0 0 0 20 3 11 14 9 4 1 0 39 4 14 16 6 6 0 0 42 5 12 7j?. ,J9 17 3 7 0 0 39 Tot. Including PK 74 75 33 j3 20 3 3 0 '-~ 72. 68% 27.32% i\n.,.,,,..., 'Pee 6~ ~4\ng\nw a 9:3 3'7ir6%-Z6~'4 t--- -------- -------- -------- 136 North Pulaski High School 9 60 35 78 67 11 5 256 10 46 42 55 53 8 4 208 11 38 50 59 61 4 4 216 58 4 1 165 10/19/09 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 6 14:16:34 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID #: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE School Tot. 171 ~1 156 238 11 239 27 1'---~~~- 38.70% 61.30% ------ ------ ------ )/ ------ -------- --------1c, -------- 137 Arnold Drive Elementary J1 PK 2 5 11 8 5 3 34 K 4 0 19 29 4 3 59 1 4 7 16 12 2 6 47 2 5 8 10 6 0 6 35 3 7 3 8 8 2 0 28 4 2 3 8 9 2 3 27 5 8 1 5 6 2 2 24 ~~/P Tot. Including PK 32 j1 27 77 ,tl\u0026gt; 78 17 ~I) 23 Gii::) 23.23% 7 6. 77% r2 2,6 22-tl 23. 64% ~~ -------- -------- -------- 139 Oakbrooke Elementary PK 12 4 8 11 2 2 39 K 13 17 30 23 0 3 86 1 17 12 33 20 1 1 84 2 13 16 39 20 1 1 90 3 24 12 21 23 2 0 82 4 15 14 19 27 0 0 75 5 19 13 23 26 1 ~?~ ,J 0 82 Tot. Including PK 113 JO' 88 173 3J3 150 7 7 cw 37.36% 62.64% SsAeele '!lee. 101 8.4 ------,16 H9 5 5 4'9'9- '3'7.'7~ -------- -------- -------- 140 Northwood Middle School 6 43 48 54 39 9 9 202 7 41 44 50 52 10 9 206 8 48 36 50 56 6 4 200 ~1 ~D ,rul \u0026gt;/1 .h\"\" School Tot. 132 128 154 147 25 22 ~ 42.76% 57.24% -------- -------- -------- 141 Murrell Taylor Elementary K 24 17 19 17 0 1 78 1 21 24 10 15 0 0 70 2 12 13 12 11 0 1 49 3 30 27 11 6 1 0 75 4 15 16 15 7 2 1 56 5 21 b 15 8 9 0 0 53 t~ School Tot. 123\n,'~ 112 75 l\n_/0 65 3 \u0026amp; 3 20 61.68% 38.32% -------- -------- -------- 142 Pine Forest Elementary Sc K 16 16 29 31 3 3 98 1 11 15 28 29 1 2 86 2 10 20 25 38 2 2 97 3 20 15 31 28 0 2 96 4 12 7 36 37 4 1 97 5 16 16 25 H 19 3 31\n. ~? 2 81 School Tot. 85 I 'l)j 89 174 ? f( 182 13 12 31.35% 68.65% -------- -------- -------- 143 Robinson Middle School 2 27 33 2 2 111 7 37 25 42 28 9 2 143 10/19/09 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 7 14:16:34 SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA ID JI: racecnt BLACK WHITE OTHER PERCENTAGES MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTALS BLACK WHITE 8 30 20 30 29 6 1 116 J. School Tot. 91 lg~--~~- 99 ,\u0026lt;\n5190 17 ~~---~- l2Q--, 42.97% 57.03% -------- -------- -------- 146 Bates Elementary PK 8 7 10 6 4 5 40 K 17 14 29 15 6 7 88 1 16 13 16 19 6 7 77 2 16 19 15 19 5 6 80 3 24 13 25 10 2 5 79 4 15 19 17 10 6 4 71 . 12 5 21 20 14 14 2 2 73 #.,lo 0\ni\u0026gt;' 105 Tot. Including PK 117 126 ~,4 93 31 1,,1 36 508\"' 43.70% 56.30% BaAlile iliili\u0026amp;. ~ ~ 16 81- 21 .Jl 4- 4-4.23 5~ -------- -------- -------- 149 Maumelle Middle School 6 49 47 84 61 3 5 249 7 48 44 70 55 3 3 223 8 53 50 60 1 1 64 5 5 237 School Tot. 150\n11 141 214 j~ 180 11\n1 13 -222,....1 41. 04% 58.96% ------ ------ -------- -------- -------- 150 Chenal Elementary K 12 10 34 28 1 4 89 1 12 14 35 26 2 2 91 2 11 14 31 33 3 1 93 3 14 15 27 24 0 3 83 4 19 12 26 32 1 4 94 5 10 ~o?o 1GI 8 24 1 17 0 0 59 13 160 ~, School Tot. 78 73 177 7 14 ~ 29.67% 70.33% -------- -------- -------- .. '  f't 10/19/09 PAGE 8 14:16:34 #: racecnt PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Eiementary 7 8 9 10 11 12 li/0 PRB II Secondary Totals Biet: !fats tJ/0 PRS K BLACK MALE FEMALE 118 312 285 282 351 297 324 297 2148- 298 334 335 332 244 194 1737 a881i 108 282 279 304 299 294 286 312 ~ 294 275 289 254 285 226 co ~ 1623 3\\i?Q PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SEX/RACE TOTAL BY LEA WHITE OTHER MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT ************************* 159 161 471 458 455 392 390 369 379 368 383 372 362 341 302 263 2742 2563 310 257 286 286 290 283 245 274 250 221 222 222 34 73 66 50 55 59 53 35 391 42 33 41 31 21 19 28 73 72 59 49 51 43 39 386 31 21 26 22 26 21 -=~~=-J'~~=~~=- 187 ~3~-=~~- --4\nui\n.. - -41-06-- ___ _,.-,7,-.9,-... -533 TOTALS 608 1669 1549 1454 1501 1456 1409 1248 10286 -------- 1232 1235 1264 1158 1047 904 C) ID PERCENTAGES BLACK WHITE 37.17% 40.66% 40.87il -------- 49.12% 62.83% 59.34% 59.13 -------- 50.88% 50.88% 4 47\"l+. ll..---55 . ~ ========================================================================~======================== ========== Dist. Tot. With PRE-K 4003 3787 4504 4267 612 561 \\.___~/ 43.93% 56.07% ========================'=1==~O=C fi= ============ ~1 t================== I,7 7'5==================== ~ 17-==.= ======= IMPORTANT NOTES ************************* PK - \"PRE-K\" CHILDREN ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STATE'S OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT COUNT FOR THE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE LEARNING ACADEMY WAS NOT REPORTED, BECAUSE THE STUDENTS WERE COUNTED AS PART OF THE SCHOOL WHICH THEY WOULD NORMALLY ATTEND. ~J r . ~ E3 0 -J Z::/4/) ..!/YJO ~~d-5 fiJ:? /4F'9/ - C:,09 -5~5 -ff -~~p ,to1o +\u0026lt;:, + I\n3 -f 0 -t I \u0026lt;j\npl- ~g,:\ni7 07g 7r\n,5 ~ \u0026amp;\u0026lt;:.5 ~~ - ~~~a ~1C: .~Y ~?-/o +t.-ci9 -t-.sis -r-7..i/ -f /E-YtY' )11'' -\u0026lt;r:, -13 - 0 - IC, - ----.:__ /J)I- ~, ~~:a. ~~9? c,)/of? ~do'? SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY PORT. CLASSRMS CAPACITY TOTAL CAPACITY CENTRAL 2276 20@25 500 2776 J.A. FAIR 1200 6@25 150 1350 HALL 1754 0 0 1754 MCCLELLAN 1440 0 0 1440 PARKVIEW 1200 4@25 100 1300 Subtotal 7870 30@.25 750 8620 MIDDLE 0 CLOVERDALE 885 0 0 885 DUNBAR 888 4(@25 100 988 FOREST HEIGHTS 780 0 0 780 HENDERSON 960 4(@.25 100 1060 MABELVALE 681 8(@.25 200 881 MANN 900 0 0 900 PULASKI HEIGHTS 858 0 0 858 Subtotal 5952 16@25 400 6352 ELEMENTARY 0 BALE 488 0 0 488 BASELINE 360 0 0 360 BOOKER 645 2@25 50 695 BRADY 528 0 0 528 CARVER 556 1 (@.25 25 581 CHICOT 749 6@25 150 899 DODD 271 8@.25 200 471 FAIR PARK ECC 304 0 0 304 FOREST PARK 400 2@.25 50 450 FRANKLIN 532 0 0 532 FULBRIGHT 585 12 C@2. 5 300 865 GEYER SPRINGS 358 0 0 358 GIBBS 472 0 0 472 JEFFERSON 471 0 0 471 KING 715 0 0 715 MABELVALE 443 0 0 443 MCDERMOTT 453 4 (@. 25 100 553 MEADOWCLIFF 358 0 0 358 OTTERCREEK 537 4@25 100 637 PULASKI HEIGHTS 350 0 0 350 ROCKEFELLER 481 0 0 481 ROMINE 507 0 0 507 STEPHENS 646 0 0 646 TERRY 575 12 (@25 300 875 WAKEFIELD 607 0 0 607 WASHINGTON 836 0 0 836 WATSON 591 12 ra, 25 300 891 WESTERN HILLS 320 0 0 320 WILLIAMS 585 0 0 585 WILSON 340 0 0 340 -WOODRUFF- ECC 160 0 0 160 -~- ~-- .. __.. .,.,._ .... --... --- .. -- ~ .......... ~ -~- - \"' .. ,... .. ..,.. .. - -- -- - Subtotal Elem. 15203 631 n5 1575 16778 Subtotal Mid. 5952 161 ~ 25 400 6352 Subtotal H.S. 7870 301 n5 750 8620 Grand Total 29025 109 I :1225 2725 31750 IXffit)natMt.:Scih'oo=l~  HAMILTON 912 0 0 912 FELBER-IBadaelt) 162 - 0 0 .  a.2-~ ACCatMETRO 250 0 0 250 Alternative Total 1324 0 0 1324 Polly Ramer From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: Polly: \"Eggleston, Deana\" \u0026lt;Deana.Eggleston@lrsd.org\u0026gt; \u0026lt;paramer@odmemail.com\u0026gt; Monday, November 30, 2009 4:23 PM Capacity-As of Nov. 30, 2009.xls FW. School Capacities Attached are the building capacities for LRSD. Deana Eggleston From: Gillaspy, Cathryn Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:04 PM To: Eggleston, Deana Cc: Adams, Wayne subject: RE: School Capacities Page I of I Attached is the school-capacities list as you requested. Would you please send us updated enrollment figures when available. Thanks, Cathryn Gillaspy for Wayne Adams 12/1/2009 Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation Caoacitv Calculator For District Use K-5 ElementaN Klndemarten thru 5th Grade #General #S12ecia~ Student 09-10 % Classrooms Rooms NAt Ca\"\"'cltv Enrollment Caoacitv .-:,~\u0026lt;.:. .... _-.\n,_.-:'..-.:: :'..:.: ., ' ' .. Amboy 22 6 16 400 353 88 Belwood 15 9 6 150 126 84 Boone Pari\u0026lt; 31 13 18 450 388 86 Crestwood 29 10 19 475 468 99 Glenview 17 9 8 200 189 95 Indian Hills 34 9 25 625 588 94 Lakewood Elem 22 4 18 450 416 92 Lynch Drive 29 12 17 425 297 70 Meadow Pari\u0026lt; 13 5 8 200 183 92 North Heights 31 12 19 475 446 94 Pari\u0026lt; Hill 24 10 14 350 333 95 PikeVigw 25 9 16 400 394 99 Seventh Street 28 12 16 450 367 92 ~ Total 4\u0026amp;15' - 4548 93 I/.:_,:..  Redwood Pre-K .n.,v 233 Pre-k - 5 total 4781 ,, ,\n, I I c' ,,v ~?T Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facllltles and Transportation Capacity Calculator For District Use 6-12 Secondary 6th Grade thru 12th Grade #General #of Student 09-10 I o/. I Classrooms Students Caoacltv Enrollment Capacity J ,, ,.. ., West Campus 65 30 ..~ ~~ ~- .. 1555 94 East Campus 60 30 1530 ,'\\ 1371 90 Lakewood Middle 33 30 --\u0026amp;44,i \"' 709 84 Ridgeroad Middle 28 30 714 456 64 Rose City Middle 16 30 408 146 36 Poplar Street Middle 31 28 737 627 85 / Secondary Total 5~ 4864 83 00S Argenta Alternative ::JV _, District Total ~ 9645 90 - 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Class PRE-K I KIND FIRST I SECOND I THIRD FOURTH I Capacity (Revised) Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT E Adkins~\u0026gt;\u0026gt; -: _ :::-: \\62i?c /65 :-:41 . es Arnold Dr 453 7 28 35 4 55 59 11 36 47 13 20 33 10 18 28 5 21 26 saker-- \u0026gt;\u0026lt;121J1: , o \u0026gt;o - 25 - : 10 ii5 2s \u0026lt;'15 ::100 22  M r~so 2 \u0026gt;+i \u0026gt;:'ss' 21\u0026gt;/ 44 ::_:\ns9\nBates 863 16 25 40 31 67 86 29 48 77 38 47 83 36 41 79 34 38 72 ailvoin~etQ sot : 1 - 10. 20 \u0026lt; 1 \u0026lt;14 :s1 , 2 'ts -11 i s s.1 .\u0026gt;56 \\2\n_uis :/llti ~,:5,)il\n,'/\nCato 800 4 16 20 19 44 63 17 45 62 14 25 39 18 35 53 16 43 69 Chenai -\u0026lt;i550 O \u0026lt;-o :.coo\n:22: 67 ':89 \\21 :_55 t.,:$2 '.\n25 /:6.~ t'.\"93 :'.'.)ii /54 i\u0026lt;la r/31 (c63\n':['\n94~ Clinton 840 33 45 - 76 69 77 136 59 60 119 61 68 129 60 52 112 61 39 100 Co!IS~ -!439, 7.\n3,'.'.1020. 6---26'.dil _-4\n'.-23::'dt.\n:-3,(:20 2sY13ns\u0026lt;ao:-::12\\V42~ Crvstal Hill 670 20 20 40 45 85 130 35 70 105 41 79 120 41 64 105 63 69 122 ouori,e--  - 98 o o -_ --o ,. so - ao - '60_ -M_ :31  :M \u0026lt;:22 c.21 --\\113_ -19 : 32 - ,,l-i '/-17 /23 \u0026gt;?:4o\nHarris~ 906 o o o 24 _ 8 30 29 7 36 34 4 38 23 4 27 22 6 27 jaxE!wn 860 : o ---o o ,42 32  t.4 $3 _ 3a _ \"01\n1,0 -24 '\\74 :.so _20. ts /.\u0026lt;11_1 2 1 '\"\u0026gt;~sr i Landmark 711 14 25 39 21 41 62 12 37 49 24 33 57 24 34 58 17 27 44 Law$\u0026lt;\u0026gt;-ri . '3'i2 . -3 - - 11 \u0026gt; 20 : 13 . 33 46 -_1 0 37 - 41 ._:_\\1 13 2 /\n. 43 --11 /,40  51 :9 ,\n.Jsi 'f55 1 Oak Grove 626 23 31 54 10 44 54 8 35 41 12 27 39 11 38 49 13 36 49 oakiiiooke O:ssa 1s _ 2a - 39 . 3!\u0026gt;  54  84 _-2il - s11 es -_2 9 _i\ne~  01 _ 35: 4a .' ss . 29 :As ?/1.s : Pine Forest 554 o 0 I) 34 66 100 25 59 84 30 68 98 35 62 97 19 79 98 Plnewiiod 677 . . 0 ...... O O  44 31 76 42 '33 .15 _ 2~ ~ 23  / \u0026amp;1 _40 26  66 :. 31 '\n': 2!i //~3 - Robinson 54'4 1 19 20 7 22 29 7 27 34 9 31 40 15 32 47 18 27 45 Scott.. \\til4 6 - 14 - 20 8 20 :-28. 6 _,23.. 29  .i a :/11!: :.2\u0026amp; .12 .: 14 - 26 FCs :'.\\~!l\n:.\n36l Sheiwood 581 2 18 20 12 36 48 .19 36 57 23 33 66 24 35 59 24 34 58 syJ,iani-tils --~ t 8. 1:2_ - 20: 33 '37 -/10 -.. 19 \u0026lt;:M _- 45 29 :21 -~\n:-5'\n52 1 /:3~ 0 66 ::-26\"\n~~$ '(62 j Taylor 666 O O 0 42 38 80 45 25 70 24 24 48 58 19 77 31 25 66 ro11eson.   ,  ss1 -12 - 2a 38 '18  49 s 1  1s\n35 _- ill\u0026gt;- :2 Q .'ls_ /4il ::-2.4:'. i4 -,:'.(a /io -\n~1 :y~1\nTotal Elem: -- 15,345 m 382 609 600 107,6 1676 567 985 1552 587 87() 1451 : 855 847 1502 _594 866 . 1460  ' .. ~ 'j. :--.,::._.: '-.:. ~:_:------- ~}::l:'r' -___- ::. -J1-~~~~~i.~~~i~t~~~~~f~~:~SECONDARY SCHOOLS Class SIXTH SEVENTH EIGHTH NINTH TENTH ELEVENTH ~a~ _,. NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT teainliS:AeacfeO,y/l'~.}::Jdl'7 --\n\"'~x\n~ :~\n0 -~-~-*'o{~ .::r},\n\"y~'6~ =~o ~:?\n~-7:::f:-o1H QX fOtJ .~}E-W?\"f(ftO ~)) :f t~e-o~ to ~%0\\ :!\u0026gt;~t:ou 7(0 7~J) c\ns?~~-~ o FullerMlddle 1380 120 96 216 110 69 199 112 104 216 O o O O O O O o O Jal(M.fddlet\u0026lt;---::_ _ -. -.::\n',:,,.\"s_i!do4 .o -_--1-,1 9 --,229d aii ,H3 252 .-.14s. '.-llo .. : .\n.-~5 ,,\u0026gt;r, 'ic,/p i\n-~_, _,, _.,,-pi. :,~ \n,,~o' :/L:,o .-.,~o -:-o, ,~-.\":o\nMaumelle Mlddle 840 97 153 250 93 132 225 103 134 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North PulaslcHl klh 1050 0 O O O  0 0 0 O O 93 163 256 69 121 210 89 130 219 OakGroveJr/Sr 1130 O o O O O O O O O 51 67 118 40 55 95 36 45 81 Robln80n High 770 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 68 78 146 63 76 139 49 71 120 SYivan Hills Hlah 1120 0 0 0 O O o O O o 113 97 210 100 120 220 88 107 195 Total Secondary: 12,600 604 627 1231 699 640 1239 611 635 1246 620 646 1265 662 576 1157 628 518 1046 TOTAL ENROLLMENT _NOTE: Leaming Academy counts are reflected In the school of record's database for 5th and 8th day counts .. North Little Rock School District Quarter 1 - 2009-2010 School Res MM Amboy Elementary 331.08 1.00 Belwood Elementary 126.80 0.00 Boone Park Elementary 334.25 0.00 Crestwood Elementary 470.68 0.00 Glenview Elementary 169.40 0.00 Indian Hills Elementary 587.18 3.00 Lakewood Elementary 407.05 2.00 Lynch Drive Elementary 244.73 3.00 Meadow Park Elementary 167.43 0.00 North Heights Elementary 398.03 1.00 Park Hill Elementary 306.55 5.00 Pike View Elementary 345.55 12.00 Seventh Street Elementary 320.93 0.00 **Elementary School Totals 4209.66 27.00 Poplar Street Middle 620.25 6.00 Lakewood Middle 574.83 130.00 Rose City Middle 147.98 0.00 Ridgeroad Middle Charter 450.95 0.98 **Middle School Totals 1794.01 136.98 NLRHS-East Campus 1146.33 226.45 NLRHS-West Campus 1319.78 247.83 **High School Totals 2466.11 474.28 ***District Totals 8469.78 638.26 Total 332.08 126.80 334.25 470.68 169.40 590.18 409.05 247.73 167.43 399.03 311.55 357.55 320.93 4236.66 626.25 704.83 147.98 451.93 1930.99 1372.78 1567.61 2940.39 9108.04 o SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2009  Districtse' nrollmenht its highs,l ows Loss, gain of pupils in LR, NLR, Pulaski County to affect funds from state CYNTIIlA HOWELL ARKANSASDEMOCRA~GAZETIE Enrollments in the three Pulaski County school districts have gone up, down ahd stayed about the same in a year in which the numbers of charter schools and private schools ticked upward. After enrollment plummeted by more than 800 students between the 2007-08 and 2008-09 school years, the Little Rock School District's stu~ent count this year pla-teaued at 25,899, just 11 fewer $327 million total budget. students than last year. \"It's my understanding we The stable enrollment is could lose about $66,000 as expected to mean a far more the result of losing those 11 stable financial future for students,\" Little Rock School district leaders who spent Board President Charles much of the last school year Armstrong said Friday. planning for what became an ''It makes it easier. It means $8 million cut in state aid for we won't have as much of a this school year because of deficit to overcome.\" the decline. He added that the relief State foundation aid to the from budget~cutting will free district, which is based on district leaders to focus more student enrollment, is about on raising student achieve$ 55.4 million this year in a  ment. In the Pulaski County Special School District\nthe student count is down, as are any prospects for state aid increases. The county district's pi:ekindergarten- through-12thgrade enrollment dropped b 329 students to 17,734c, ontinuing the district's 20-year general enrollment decline. The county district has given up its rank as the state's second-largest district to the See ENR9LLMENPaTg, e5 B , Enrollment  Continued from Page 1 B Springdale School District, which has 18,148 students this year. That number doesn't include prekindergarten children. The North Little Rock School district enrollment is up 168 students thi.s year, to 266L - Arkansas public sc\n_hool districts and charter schools report their Oct. l enrollments each year to the Arkansas Department of Education. The numbers are considered the official enrollments for the year and are a harbinger of state fw1ding to come. State foundation aid to districts is actually based on the average enrollment over the first three quarters of the preceding school year, but the Oct. 1 counts in any year signal the course a district's finances are likely to take in the school year to follow. CHARTESRC HOOLS The enrollment changes in public school districts are affected in part by independently run public charter schools that didn't exist 10 years ago, and by private schools. Public charter-school enrollment in Pulaski County this year is up 718 students, from 2,458 last year to 3,176. The increase reflects the addition of two new charter schools - Jacksonville Lighthouse Charter School, enrollment 340, and Little Rock Preparatory Academy, enrollment 64. Pulaski County now has 10 charter schools, not counting the Arkansas Virtual Academy that is based in Little Rock but has a statewide enrollment. In addition to the new charter schools, several of the existing charter schools expanded by adding grades to their campuses. Academics Plus Charter in Maumelle, enrollment 541, added second grade to the school. Now, the campus is a complete kindergartenthrough- 12th-gradc system. The eStem High School in Little Rock added a 10th grade, bringing the total enrollment at the kindergartenthrough-! Oth-grade eStem system to 931. The LISA Academy-North in Sherwood added a ninth grade, bringing that campus count to 379. Coovenant Keepers Charter School in southwest Little Rock also added ninth grade, becoming a sixth-through-ninth-grade school with 194 students. Enrollment in the 25 Pulaski County area private and parochial schools that are members or candidates for membership in the Arkansas Nonpublic School Accrediting Association was 10,526l ast year, the most recent year for which data is available. Enrollment in those 25 schools overall was down 435 from the 10,961 total in 2007-08. However, Episcopal Collegiate School has opened a brand-new elementary school that is serving 212 pupils this (\\.. Enrollmenint PulaskCi ounty /\\. charter school in a brand-new V'\\ building, referring to the Jack_____________ 2_0_0_8-_0_9_2_0n'-(- -10s o'nville Lighthouse Charter Little Rock School District 25,910 ,. 25,899 School. ,a 06  1i  7 34 ......-:-\"Bru t we do have plans and  9:49    9:66i hopefully we'll see growth in Pulaski Counly Special School District NortLhit ileR ockS ctioiiiD islrict  P~l~s~jco,-un.frc_~~sAct~irii o1j   '    the next few years, especially 2.4\n5 . ~)76 with the opening of the new 2007-08 2008-09 Pulas_kCi ,ou~t.yP fi.V.a..~. ..1c..eh .001'. .s..'.. chaners choocl oun!to r2 008-09is f ore ighst choolsT.h e2 009-1-0'couisn t for 10s choolsN. umberdso notI ncludteh eA rkansaVsl rtuaAt cademtyh atI s based in LittleR ockb uts ervesst udenststa tewide.   Pnvatsec hoocl ountsin cludetsh e2 5 schoolIsn PulaskCi ounttyh ata re membeorsr member-candidoaft ehsoA rkansaNso npubSlicc hooAl ccrediting AssociatiIonnc .a, ndhaveen rollmenlitsst edin t heo roanizatiodnir'se ctorTyh. o 2008-09c ountfso rt he2 5 schoolasr et hol atesat vailablero mt heo rganlzatIon. SOURCEUS:IU eR ockP, ulaskCi ountSy peciaaln dN orthL ittleR ocks choodl istricts, omcoo f OosegregaMtloonn itorinPgu, lasCkio untayr eac hartesrc hoolAs,r kansas Departmeonf Et ducatioAnr.k ansaNso npubSlicc hooAl ccreditiAnsgs ociatiIonnc . year and \"has room to grow,\" Bobbie Walters, marketing and public relations director for the school, said Friday. The Episcopal Collegiate Middle and High schools also have grown. The total enrollment is 605 students, up from 386 last year. ArkansasDemocralGazette Elementary and 16 new pupils at Lawson Elementary. The student declines were in the areas served by Jacksonville, Sylvan Hills and Mills high schools and the elementary and middle schools that serve those schools. Jacksonville Elementary School enrollment, for example, dropped by 70 to 467. Taylor Elementary is down high school in Maumelle,\" Clark said. NORTLHI TTLER OCK North Little Rock School District Superintendent Keo Kirspel attributed the enroll, ment growth in his district in part to a strong progra of academics and electives at North Little Rock Higl., School. . The tough economy maY.i have provided an assist, as, well, causing some private.,.: school students to transfer to, tuition-free public schools. ,. If the 168 student increa~e, holds throughout this school, year, the district could see an, increase in funding of about., $!million. '\" \"We're definitely hapP5' Pulaski Academy and Little about it,\" Kirspel said. \", Rock Christian schools also have increased theix numbers, accordi.ng to their Web sites. Little Rock Christian, which opened a new high school building this year, has 1,314 in prekindergarten through 12th grade, up from 1,254. 26 from 407 to 381. Mills Uni- _ Pulaski Academy, which also recently expanded the size of its campus in west Little Rock, reports its current enrollment as 1,315, up from 1,196 in 2008-09. PCSSDE NROLLMENT This year the state is ensuring that that every public school district and charter school has at least $5,940 per .student. The Pulaski County district, with a total budget of $237 million, could Jose at least $1.6 million in funding if the Joss of 275 students in kindergarten through 12th grade holds steady through this school year. The district also lost about 50 prekindergartners, but the state funding system for prekindergarten pupils is different than the funding system for elementary and secondary- school students. \"Any time you have declining enrollment, it's disappointing,\" said Rob McGill, the Pulaski County Special district's acting superintendent. ''You just have to work hard ar putting out a positive message and let parents know that we are studentcentered. We are trying to do what is right for individual students.'' The Pulaski County Special district gained student enrollment in the Maumelle and Robinson areas. The Maumelle growth was fueled by the anticipation of a new high school in the corning years. The Robinson area in west Pulaski County was helped by the addition of 59 pupils- at the new Chenal Elementary, 45 new pupils added at Baker versity Studies High dropped from 916 to 806, and Sylvan Hills High, dropped from 914 to 809. District leaders will begin in January to plan the budget and decide whether staffing needs to be trimmed for the next school year, McGill said. At the same time, district staff are visiting each campus to audit the educational programs, to find areas of weakness. \"We're talking about it and determining plans for improvement\n he said, offering as an example the emphasis the district is planning on revitalizing the Advanced Placement program at Mills. The Mills Advanced Placement program is designed to attract students from across the county district. \"There are a lot of good things we are doing in the district,\" McGill said. \"We have a lot of great teachers and administrators who are doing the right thing out there. The more we talk about our strengths and weaknesses, the stronger we'll be.\" Tim Clark, president of the School Board for the county district, said it is difficult for the district to compete with a\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1811","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2009-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2000-2009","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1811"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["157 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gych_rogp_086","title":"Lonnie King, 28 September 2009.","collection_id":"gych_rogp","collection_title":"Reflections on Georgia Politics oral history collection, 2006-2010","dcterms_contributor":["Short, Bob, 1932-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["King, Lonnie","Short, Bob, 1932"],"dc_date":["2009-09-28"],"dcterms_description":["Lonnie King discusses growing up in Arlington, Georgia. He recalls experiencing racism from a young age and his parents' secret participation in NAACP activities. King reflects on his time in the Navy and the racism he experienced there. King recalls his friendship with Julian Bond and participating in the Greensboro sit-ins. He explains how the idea to write \"An Appeal for Human Rights\" came up and the circumstances surrounding its publication. King discusses the difficulty of recruiting and training nonviolent students. King explains how the Appeal took a different approach to civil rights than the NAACP and describes how the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee was founded and organized. King explains his friendship with Martin Luther King, Jr., and SNCC's relationship with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. King reflects on a situation where he and Martin Luther King, Jr. were arrested for protesting at Rich's Department Store. He describes how the Kennedys' involvement in the arrest influenced African American voting nationwide. King also describes several class action lawsuits that were significant to the Civil Rights Movement. King discusses the crippled education system in some areas heavily populated by African Americans and explains the importance of programs such as Teach for America. He also recalls the circumstances surrounding Freedom Rides. King recalls several problems experienced within SNCC and the triumphs of the Civil Rights Movement.","Lonnie King was born in Arlington, Georgia. He was raised in Atlanta and served in the U.S. Navy. He left the Navy in 1957, returned to Atlanta, and earned his degree from Morehouse College. In 1960 he was present at the founding of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) at Shaw University. On March 9, 1960, King and SNCC published An Appeal for Human Rights as an advertisement in various Atlanta newspapers. A critical document of the Civil Rights Movement, the Appeal called for complete racial desegregation by peaceful and nonviolent means. King has taught at Georgia State University.","Finding aid available in repository.","Interviewed by Bob Short."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection","http://sclfind.libs.uga.edu/sclfind/view?docId=ead/RBRL220ROGP.xml"],"dcterms_subject":["National Association for the Advancement of Colored People","Southern Christian Leadership Conference","Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","Civil rights movements--Georgia","Civil rights demonstrations--Georgia","Freedom Rides, 1961","Education--Georgia","Civil rights demonstrations","Civil rights movements","Education","Georgia"],"dcterms_title":["Lonnie King, 28 September 2009."],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://purl.libs.uga.edu/russell/RBRL220ROGP-086/ohms"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection, ROGP 086, Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies, University of Georgia Libraries, Athens, Georgia, 30602-1641."],"dlg_local_right":["Resources may be used under the guidelines described by the U.S. Copyright Office in Section 107, Title 17, United States Code (Fair use). Parties interested in production or commercial use of the resources should contact the Russell Library for a fee schedule."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews"],"dcterms_extent":["1 interview (93 min.) : sd., col."],"dlg_subject_personal":["King, Lonnie C., 1936-","Bond, Julian, 1940-2015","King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gych_rogp_087","title":"Tom Houck, 28 September 2009.","collection_id":"gych_rogp","collection_title":"Reflections on Georgia Politics oral history collection, 2006-2010","dcterms_contributor":["Short, Bob, 1932-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Houck, Thomas, 1947","Short, Bob, 1932"],"dc_date":["2009-09-28"],"dcterms_description":["Tom Houck discusses growing up in Boston before moving to Atlanta to work in the Civil Rights Movement and in television. He recalls meeting Martin Luther King, Jr., at the Selma to Montgomery March. Houck recalls his work with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and explains the organization's purpose and people. He discusses answering Martin Luther King's mail for the SCLC, having dinner at the King house, and becoming the Kings' driver. Houck recalls several personal stories relating to the King family. Houck recalls Dr. Martin Luther King loving to read, swim, and play the lottery. He discusses Coretta King's involvement with the civil rights movement and mentions her fundraising work for the SCLC. Houck discusses demonstrations such as open housing demonstrations, the Poor People's campaign, and store picketing. He recalls that Dr. Martin Luther King, Sr., did not participate in politics but was friendly with Georgia governors. Houck explains how Maddox's election made many activists uncomfortable. He recalls being arrested 18 to 20 times in the course of his activism. Houck discusses Zell Miller's involvement with civil rights and his recollections of Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young. Thid interview takes place at Manuel's Tavern and Houck explains who Manuel Malouf was and the history of the tavern. Houck recalls Zell Miller's campaign for lieutenant governor and comments on his friendship with both candidates. He weighs in on whether the civil rights movement is dead. Houck describes how he got into talk radio and television as a political commentator and comments on the state of party politics in Georgia.","Thomas Houck was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on August 21, 1947. He dropped out of high school at age 15 and joined the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) to work under Hosea Williams. In 1965, he met Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., at a meeting of the SCLC, and in 1966 he came to Atlanta and became the King family's personal driver. Later, he became an organizer for the SCLC, and was active in numerous demonstrations and marches. He filed a court case, Houck and Williams vs. Birmingham-Jefferson County, which led to the desegregation of Southern jails. Houck went on to help campaign for various Atlanta mayors and governors, including Maynard Jackson and Zell Miller, and started doing commentary for WGST Radio. He then went on to host various politically-oriented radio and television shows, retiring from full time broadcasting in 2001.","Finding aid available in repository.","Interviewed by Bob Short."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection","http://sclfind.libs.uga.edu/sclfind/view?docId=ead/RBRL220ROGP.xml"],"dcterms_subject":["Southern Christian Leadership Conference","Civil rights demonstrations--Georgia","Civil rights movements--Georgia","Civil rights--Georgia","Political campaigns--Georgia","Civil rights","Civil rights demonstrations","Civil rights movements","Political campaigns","Georgia"],"dcterms_title":["Tom Houck, 28 September 2009."],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://purl.libs.uga.edu/russell/RBRL220ROGP-087/ohms"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Reflections on Georgia Politics Oral History Collection, ROGP 087, Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies, University of Georgia Libraries, Athens, Georgia, 30602-1641."],"dlg_local_right":["Resources may be used under the guidelines described by the U.S. Copyright Office in Section 107, Title 17, United States Code (Fair use). Parties interested in production or commercial use of the resources should contact the Russell Library for a fee schedule."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews"],"dcterms_extent":["1 interview (87 min.) : sd., col."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Houck, Thomas, 1947-","Jackson, Maynard, 1938-2003","Shipp, Bill, 1933-","King, Coretta Scott, 1927-2006","Miller, Zell, 1932-2018","King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":229,"next_page":230,"prev_page":228,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":2736,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}