{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"auu_auc-167_auc-167-0053","title":"Ann Austin, October 12, 2011","collection_id":"auu_auc-167","collection_title":"The Spelman Independent Scholars Oral History Project","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-10-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Spelman Independent Scholars Oral History Project||http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/fa:167"],"dcterms_subject":["African American women","Oral history","African Americans--Civil rights"],"dcterms_title":["Ann Austin, October 12, 2011"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Spelman College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/auc.167:0053"],"dcterms_temporal":["2010/2019"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["sound recordings"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1854","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-10-10/2011-10-31"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","Charter schools","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1854"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["141 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1837","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-10-03/2011-10-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","Charter schools","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1837"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["85 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_53","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2011-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/53"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n1 - Dr. Tom W. Kimbrell Commissioner State Board of Education Dr. Ben Mays Clinton Chair Jim Cooper Melbourne Vice Chair Joe Black Newport Brenda Gullett Fayetteville Sam Ledbetter Little Rock Alice Mahony El Dorado Toyce Newton Crossett Mireya Reith Fayetteville Vicki Saviers Little Rock Four Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201 -1019 (501) 682-44 75 - ArkansasEd.org An Equal Opportunity Employer ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION October 31, 2011 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, .Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 RECEIVED NOV ,'\n- 2011 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Mr. M. Samuel Jones III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 DPMIHDY Dear Gentlemen: By way of this letter, I am advising you that I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of October, 2011 in the abovereferenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ~ C. ci~ JeremyC. Lasiter General Counsel ' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 DPM/HDY PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the AD E's Project Management Tool for October, 2011. c.~-~ BY: ~~ my C. Lasiter, General Counsel Ark. Bar No. 2001-205 Ark. Department of Education CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeremy Lasiter, certify that on October 31, 2011, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~c~~ my C. Lasiter IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION R LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRIC T, ET AL V. PLAINY? NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW NOV :~ - 2011 OFFICE OF REGATION MOHITORING PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 1 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Based forFY E alcufated at Sep E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 rc . t should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 On October 26 2010 chan es were made in the ex ense per child to $8,336. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2011 for FY10/11 , subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. !~ tr J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M-transportation budget to A0E. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing,-December of each year. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 In September 2010, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 10/11 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 In August 2010, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. In August 2010, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 10/11 to the Districts. In January 2011 , General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 10/11 to the Districts. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 In September 2010, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $4,054,730.00 NLRSD - $1,471 ,255.67 PCSSD - $2,544,356.20 In September 2010, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2010, the following had been paid for FY 10/11 : LRSD - $1 ,354,368.33 NLRSD - $5i0,218.13 PCSSD - $905,109.15 In February 201 1, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 28, 2011 , the following had been paid for FY 10/11 : LRSD - $2,708,736.66 NLRSD - $1 ,020,436.26 PCSSD -$1 ,810,218.30 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001 , paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program . In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program . In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2009, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 09/10 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2010, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 10/11 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 19-97, the ADE purchaseEI 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00 and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In March 2009, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,049,584.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In August 2009, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,049,584. Bids were opened on May 7, 2010 for sixteen Magnet and M-to-M buses. The low bid was by Diamond State Bus Sales for a total of $1,135,960. There are fourteen 65 passenger buses at $71 ,210 per unit and two 47 passenger units at $69,510 per unit. Little Rock will get 8 - 65 passenger buses. Pulaski County Special will get 4 - 65 passenger buses and 2 - 47 passenger buses. North Little Rock will get 2 - 65 passenger buses. In September 2010, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Diamond States Bus Sales $1 ,135,960. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued)  11 rsixteen Magnet and '1       ~ates for a tota unit,. four hlift1\u0026gt;usses o cfeliver~. liftbus.P . rbus$e$ oger 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. Actual as of October 31, 2011 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q . Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Final payment was distributed July 1994. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. T. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 fo(FY 07i08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 2010 for FY 10/11 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 10/11 . Distribution in July 2011 for FY 11/12 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 11/12. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 12 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was-the total amount due to the ODM for FY-04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to ODM for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 201 O for FY 10/11 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 10/11 . Distribution in July 2011 for FY 11/12 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 11 /12. 13 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE admir:iistrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education and tMe Districts. Then it was filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate- the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were ser:it to_the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual-Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 15 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regacding team -visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 16 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, -the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and fhe ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1:30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was -scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11 , 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Pha~e Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Wo~king Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1: 30 p. m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 20 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in -academic achievement for black students. and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduied for-October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 21 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be reieased from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the la-st legislative...session -that suggested all t hree districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasibility study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervIsIon. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts: are. declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD bein~ declared unitary and the Joshua interveners filing a notice of appeal to the st Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua interveners have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua interveners. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, -the ADE lmplementatien Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Pbase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lnterveners filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overtl.!rn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lnterveners. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lnterveners requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facilities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lnterveners. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lnterveners objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007 allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in the special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. , stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jaeksonville out of the PGSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court appro.Y.ed- desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then. Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 25 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive th is year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that 'Ldistrictwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. 26 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On January 8, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Mr. Scott Richardson, Arkansas Assistant Attorney General, received a letter in January from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the appeal of the unitary status ruling was \"under active consideration\". Mr. Richardson had sent a letter to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in December asking him to inform the judges of legislative, legal and financial matters that hinge on the panel's decision. The panel had heard oral arguments about the appeal in March of 2008 . . In another news article, the Attorney General's Office rejected proposals to cap the number of new charter schools in Pulaski County, waive penalties for fiscal, academic or facilities distress, and establish a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. The Attorney Generai.,s Office also rejected the request that for the next seven years, the . three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding- that they will receive this year. Instead, the office suggested reimbursement based on declining percentage rates, such as 77 percent of desegregation funding the second year, 54 percent the third year, and similar reductions the following years. Other topics of discussion in the meeting included the school choice law and the charter school law. The LRSD has said that charter schools interfere with efforts to comply with desegregation obligations. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 23, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ruling from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Little Rock School District had achieved unitary status was discussed. U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. withdrew from the desegregation lawsuit, and was replaced by U.S. District Judge Brian Miller. The first hearing on the Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit with Judge Miller was scheduled for April 13, 2009. This hearing was cancelled because Judge Miller was involved in a car accident that morning. The hearing was going to be about how far the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts have progressed toward unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 27 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On July 9, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article stated that on May 19, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to schedule court hearings on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 22, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article states that Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel has proposed a seven year phase out of state desegregation payments. Another article talked about tlTe first court hearing with U.S. District Judge Brian Miller on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The hearing was held on September 30. Sam Jones, an attorney for the Pulaski Special School District, Stephen Jones, an attorney for the North Little Rock School District, and Chris Heller, an attorney for the Little Rock School District, want the state desegregation payments to the three districts to continue even if the districts are all unitary. John Walker, an attorney for the Joshua lntervenors, told the judge that an expert should testify on educational achievement in the North Little Rock and Pulaski Special School Districts. He thought the judge was \"influenced\" by the reports he had received from the state. Judge Miller set January 11 as a unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District, and January 25 as a unitary status hearing date for the Pulaski County Special School District. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 7, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 28 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On January 7, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article talked about declining enrollments in the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). The PCSSD lost 275 students this year. Since state funding is based on average enrollment, the reduction in students could cost the PCSSD $1 .6 million if the number of students stays the same the rest of the year. Enrollment in public charter schools in Pulaski County is up this year by 718 students. Also discussed was the news that U.S. District Judge Brian Miller postponed the unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District from January 11 to January 25. He postponed the unitary status hearing date for the PCSSD from January 25 to February 22. The Joshua lntervenors had requested delays in the hearings. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2010 at 1 :30-p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On Aprii 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Louis Ferren, ADE Internal Auditor for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, talked about the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). He also talked about a draft of a federal court motion that could be presented by the Little Rock School District th.at would accuse the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Some articles talked about the PCSSD unitary status hearings discussing the condition of school facilities in the district. Mr. Doug Eaton, Director of Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation, talked about school facilities in the PCSSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 8, 2010 at 1 :30 p. m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Ms. Melissa Jacks, Interim Program Manager for Licensure provided update information about NLRSD regarding the possible closure of elementary schools in response to declining enrollment within the district. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Commissioner for Accountability, talked about the need for districts to be sure their buildings are ready to open in August. Mark White, ADE Council for Legal Services, said charter school applications will appear in the next State Board meeting agenda. 29 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On October 7, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, said U.S. District Judge Brian Miller is considering the information that was presented in the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District. He also stated that Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson is preparing a case in response to the lawsuit from the Little Rock School District that accuses the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. On January 13, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark-White from ADE Legal Services said .that -U.S. District Judge B~ian Miller is considering the information that was presented in the desegregation unitary status hearing_s for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District. He also stated that the Little Rock School District had requested information about individual students that cannot be released because of Federal student privacy regulations. Little Rock School District Superintendent Linda Watson resigned. The Little Rock School Board chose Morris Holmes as the interim superintendent. Facility plans by the Pulaski County Special School District to close several schools caused concerns by parents in the district. The plan included closing Robinson High School and sending students to Maumelle High School. Closing College Station Elementary was also part of the plan. 30 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On April 7, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. There was discussion about the lawsuit from the Little Rock School District that accuses the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. The ADE has asked U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to reject the Little Rock School District subpoena of information about students attending charter schools. An attorney for the ADE stated that the requested information could not be released because of Federal student privacy regulations. Judge Miller said that he would delay a decision about the subpoena until after his decision about whether or not the Pulaski County Special and North Little Rock districts should be given unitary status. A report released by Attorney General Dustin McDaniel stated that some of the desegregation funding provided to the Pulaski County Special and North Little Rock districts was placed in their generai-funds instead of being used for desegregation purposes. The financial rec0rds for the_Little Rock School District are being analyzed. The 88th Arkansas \"General Assembly passed an act to provide oversight of and accountability for state desegregation funding received and expended by the Pulaski County school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2011 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 7, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, talked about Plan 2000. This is an amended desegregation plan for PCSSD approved in March of 2000. Judge Brian Miller ruled on May 19, 2011 that PCSSD did not successfully meet their plan in the areas of student assignment\nadvanced placement, gifted and talented and honors programs\ndiscipline\nschool facilities\nscholarships\nspecial education\nstaff\nstudent achievement\nand monitoring. Judge Miller ruled that the NLRSD was in substantial compliance with their desegregation plan except for district staffing. The Attorney General's Office has recommended that the ADE provide more assistance to the PCSSD with the areas of Plan 2000 that have not been fully implemented. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 13, 2011 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 31 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) 32 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 33 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach , immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 34 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impedes desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their aFeas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegFegation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 35 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 36 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure thaLthey_ have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposai in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 37 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes anEI Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregaticm. The next meefing will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 38 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent IE\ntters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, a letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, a letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts-were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative SessLon, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to fhe school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. The ADE attorney is reviewing laws and regulations to look for any that may impede desegregation. In June 2011 , the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 88th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight S1\nJbcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, fhe Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the montMs of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on tile agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and -its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lnterveners filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua interveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lnterveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lnterveners were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on Jan_uary 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were fina lized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with ttTe draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 46 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and .its executive summary for the month of-September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 47 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed- and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 48 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February-10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Educafor1-reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for tt:le month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the Pi\\JiT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 49 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 50 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 51 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 52 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkamms State Board of Education reviewed-and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved~the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 3, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 53 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On December 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 16, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 11, 2009, the Arkansas State-Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive--SUmmary for the month of April. On June 8, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 10, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 19, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 8, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. 54 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 3. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On March 8, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 12, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 9, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 13, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2011, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2011, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11 , 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 16, 2011, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. 55 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2011 (Continued) On June 13, 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11 , 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2011 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 56 VI. REMEDIATION A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Pi~anner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2011 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were complet\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_156","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2011-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century","School integration","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/156"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n/12~~ ~~- _.:..___,_:__\n_-----~ _7'-il_-/~_119 ,?l,~ ?\u0026lt;'~~ - - /C' ~. ~,,1-----\"''.ffj=--- /, 0-1/0,).:::Z., ... J Polly Ramer From: \"Ring, Jean\" \u0026lt;Jean.Ring@lrsd.org\u0026gt; Date: Monday, November 21, 2011 7:57 AM To: \"'Polly Ramer'\" \u0026lt;paramer@odmemail.com\u0026gt; Subject: RE: M-to-M and magnet numbers Here you go!! Jean From: Polly Ramer [mailto:paramer@odmemail.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 20111:08 PM To: Ring, Jean Subject: M-to-M and magnet numbers Jean Page 1 of 1 ---- -- ---- -~--- Its that time of the year again when I do the enrollment report. I need from you the M-to-M transfers and the number of students in the magnet schools from the November 15th Cycle 3 report to ADE. If you could just fill in the ADM's and send it back to me, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Polly M-to-M Transfers From NLRSD: From PCSSD: Magnet numbers From NLRSD: From PCSSD: 3.0 325.07 368.00 703.43 11/21/2011 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2011/12 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED TO (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 42.00 42.00 42.00 DISTRICT: 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 11140. 50 N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICTQUARTER NO. 3 4 5 6 DAYS PRESENT NON- DAYS ADT ADA TRANSPORTED ABSENT 2/1 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8504.00 187.50 265.25 467.74 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 265.25 467.74 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES ORM PAGE: 1 1 I 472 .19 J I IR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS ADE SIS: Report Details Cyde 3 FY:22 I.IA: 6003000 County. PULASKI Dbtrkt PULASKCI O. SPEC.S CHOOl 01ST Non-Resident Students Received to (by M to M Transfer) 7701 ume Roc1c Noo-Rosident Students Receivedto OJ\\M' 10 M Tninsfe,) n02 North LittleRoc1c Non-Resident Students Receiwd to (by M to M Trans~ no3 Pumlci CoSpoa,I Toal ADT,A DA,\n,a nd ADM of M to M ReceM!d Days In Q1r 43.00 43.00 43.00 Days- Days-Non- Tra_.... T'\"\"'f'(Mtod 30020.50 4609.00 9583.00 2S9.00 0.00 0.00 Students eligible to be counteda s trtinsported indude resident students ~ng two route mi~ or more from their respective assigneds \u0026lt;hoolJ.. http://adesis.arkansas.gov/Submit/Reports/rpt307.aspx?cycle=3 Page 1 of 1 Days - ADT ADA 102LSO 698.15 SOS.34 296.00 222.86 m.J 0.00 0.00 o.oq 92L01 103422 1064.86 12/7/2011 ~ I' 3 - Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1001-CENTRAL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 09 25 29 185 177 15 10 2 0 0 112 92 4 4 656 10 25 23 183 ~ 176 5 20 0 0 0 0 127 104 2 lf 3 668 16 17 132 95 \" ~ i 11 155 t5 9 11 0 0 0 93 3 1 533 109 ~ ~~ 12 28 18 167 130 3 6 0 0 0 97 2 1 562.. CENTRAL TOTAL: 94 87 690 615 32 47 3 2 0 0 443 386 11 9 (._2419 1002-HALL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM I HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM I TOTAL 09 0 2 112 128 24 28 0 0 0 0 5 12 2 0 313 10 4 3 127 120 26 29 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 324 {\\ :'i 11 2 138 :/\n}_ 114 17 20 0 2 0 0 10 5 0 310 12 2 104 82 19 21 0 0 0 0 9 10 0 249 F , HALL TOTAL: 7 8 481 444 86 98 0 2 0 0 31 34 4 1 1196 1003-MANN MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 06 0 83 \"' 65 7 10 0 4 0 0 40 ~ ... 36 2 2 250 85 1 -3 07 3 5 65 12 9 3 0 0 0 57 ~ 34 3 r 277 08 6 7 68 'i 78 10 9 0 0 0 50 ~~ 41 1 2 273 ?t.7. MANN M/5 TOTAL: 9 13 236 208 29 28 4 4 0 0 147 111 6 5 800 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 1 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1005-PARKVIEW I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 09 6 5 83 82 21 14 3 0 0 0 39 39 3 4 299 10 7 4 74 ~ 74 16 6 0 0 0 55 37 2 ~ 3 279 11 80 ~ 64 11 11 0 0 47 35 3 1 256 12 0 5 70 1{14) 7 12 2 2 0 0 50 I'\\ 39 2 ' ' 231 PARKVIEW TOTAL: 14 15 307 267 60 33 6 3 0 0 191 150 10 9 ~ $-/7.- 1006-BOOKER I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM I TOTAL I 01 0 0 24 32 6 7 0 0 11 15 0 0 97 02 32 29 2 3 0 0 0 15 15 3 103 03 0 0 31  27 7 4 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 87 04 0 35 ('( 21 3 5 0 0 0 0 15 ~ 11 1 ' 2 94 05 27 V 27 3 11 0 0 0 0 17 ' 10 0 98 K 0 2 21 18 2 0 0 0 10 10 4 3 72 BOOKER TOTAL: 2 5 170 154 23 31 1 0 1 2 75 71 9 7 ~\n\u0026lt;:\" z 1007-DUNBAR M/S I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 06 0 100 97 14 9 2 0 0 8 10 0 2 244 07 2 2 144 131 8 8 0 0 0 0 14 \\', 16 1~ 3 329 \\} t' 08 2 0 106 J 101 6 4 0 0 0 0 10 7 2 3 241 '{3 7. DUNBAR M/S TOTAL: 4 3 350 329 28 21 1 2 0 0 32 33 3 8 (\n) 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 2 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1008-FAIR I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 09 0 1 134 129 8 11 0 0 0 12 5 0 0 301 10 0 1 87 108 7 13 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 224 11 0 97 88 5 8 0 0 0 0 6 ~ 5 0 i 0 210 ~ 12 0 0 59 61 5 2 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 137 r-: /z FAIR TOTAL: 0 3 377 386 25 34 2 0 0 0 25 20 0 0 872 1009-FORST HTS M/S !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 06 2 80 76 5 3 0 0 0 0 7 12 0 2 188 07 2 0 75 rj 83 8 5 0 0 0 5~ 9 2 191 08 1 98 82 15 2 0 0 0 0 6 '\\ 6 1 \\') 1 213 ,.,.._ 7 FORST HTS M/S TOTAL: 5 2 253 241 28 10 1 0 0 0 18 27 2 5 592 . 1010-PUL HTS M/S !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 06 4 2 72 57 0 3 0 0 0 0 50 71 261 07 3 60 , 60 4 2 0 1 0 0 61 0,.... 76 0 269 08 2 9 72 ~ 63 2 7 0 0 64 ~ 75 3 l 300 PUL HTS M/S TOTAL: 7 14 204 180 6 12 1 2 0 0 175 222 4 3 \u0026lt;.__8 30 ~C\"2 1012-MCCLELLA I GRADEi AF AM BF BM I HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 09 0 133 145 10 9 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 307 10 127 106 10 9 0 0 0 0 8 ~ 11 0 ~ 0 273 11 0 0 90 o,._ 84 7 11 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 201 12 0 0 63 60 4 8 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 140 ~ MCCLELLA TOTAL: 2 1 413 395 31 37 1 0 0 0 17 23 0 1 9V ~~ ., 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information SeNices Page 3 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1013-HENDERSN MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 06 0 2 102 94 5 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 3 222 07 0 0 101 ~ 72 9 8 0 0 0 3 !l. 9 0 ~t 0 203 08 4 2 96 I( 106 15 9 0 0 0 10 8 0 \\) 0 251 HENDERSN MIS TOTAL: 4 4 299 272 29 24 2 0 0 0 14 25 0 3 676 - 7. 1015-CLOVR MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF I TM TOTAL 06 0 0 85 97 20 22 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 233 07 0 80 93 16 19 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 rt) 0 220 08 0 76 X\\ 83 20 13 0 0 0 0 \\~ 0 0 195 CLOVR MIS TOTAL: 1 1 241 273 56 54 1 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 648 7'? D 1016~BEL MIS I GRADEi AF AM BF I BM I HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 06 0 96 15 18 0 0 0 0 7 9 3 257 07 0 2 88 107 10 13 0 0 0 0 6 ' 8 0 ~ 0 234 '\u0026lt;' (j\\ 08 0 74 100 10 15 0 0 0 12 9 0 0 222 MABEL MIS TOTAL: 1 3 269 303 35 46 0 1 0 0 25 26 1 3 713 8D(. 10/1212011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 4 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1017-BALE I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 2 22 20 7 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 64 02 1 22 36 6 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 75 03 0 16 24 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 49 04 0 0 15 30 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 59 05 0 24 'l\\' 20 0 0 0 0 0 2 r(\\\\O o Th 1 49 K 0 0 27 17 3 3 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 60 p 0 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 20 BALE TOTAL: 5 3 134 153 15 24 0 0 1 0 17 20 0 4 376 7c\n1:, 1018-BRADY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 01 0 0 21 20 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 53 02 0 26 27 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 62 03 0 0 20 .. 30 3 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 65 04 0 11 t{' - 17 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 K 2 1~ 1 39 1, \"I 05 0 0 16 ~ 19 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 K 0 25 26 2 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 65 p 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 BRADY TOTAL: 2 2 128 146 15 21 0 2 1 1 13 14 2 2 (_) 7Jl 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 5 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1020-MCDERMOT I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 17 21 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 54 02 0 22 25 4 2 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 61 03 0 0 20 16 2 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 47 04 0 21 ~ 32 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 ~ 5 0 ~o::: 2 71 05 2 24 ~ 35 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 74 K 0 0 16 15 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 44 p 2 0 14 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 40 MCDERMOT TOTAL: 5 3 134 158 20 20 1 0 0 0 13 29 3 5 391 ?6/. 1021-CARVER I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 01 0 18 16 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 46 02 2 3 22 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 15 7 0 75 03 0 20 24 3 0 0 0 0 8 0 74 04 3 19 \"I 21 3 0 0 0 8 0 72 05 0 4 23 co 19 5 0 0 0 0 7 16 0 76 K 15 15 2 4 0 0 0 0 5 7 3 54 p 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 20 CARVER TOTAL: 8 10 124 122 9 17 0 1 0 0 51 68 5 2 417 :\n11p 10/1212011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 6of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1022-BASELINE !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 11 14 10 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 51 02 0 0 7 13 7 16 0 0 0 0 0 46 03 0 0 17 13 10 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 48 04 0 0 16 14 8 10 0 0 0 0 2 (\\ 0 52 05 0 0 13 11 4 13 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 45 K 0 0 16 8 19 14 0 0 0 0 2 62 p 0 0 7 2 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 ,\nioJo BASELINE TOTAL: 0 0 87 75 62 75 0 0 0 0 11 9 1 4 (_324 1023-FAIR PRK I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I p 3 3 44 36 3 0 0 0 0 40 43 4 ~(' FAIR PRK TOTAL: 3 3 44 36 3 1 0 0 0 0 40 43 4 1024-FORST PK I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 32 25 0 0 70 02 3 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 31 27 0 73 03 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 t',.. 30 0 69 V \\(b Q 04 2 3 ~ 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 19 31 0 0 65 ~ '\\'ti 05 2 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 35 17 0 67 K 0 2 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 18 0 59 p 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 0 40 19 7o FORST PK TOTAL: 6 5 32 24 6 6 2 0 0 0 189 168 5 0 (} 10/12/2011 Department of Computer lnformatio(I Services Page 7 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1025-FRANKLIN !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 24 18 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 48 02 0 0 20 26 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 50 03 0 0 27 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 51 04 0 0 26 '- 28 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 56 'CJ 05 0 0 33 ~ 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 K 0 0 25 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 60 p 0 0 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 FRANKLIN TOTAL: 0 0 163 158 7 3 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 345 ~3,% 1027-GIBBS !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL I 01 0 13 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 1 0 45 02 2 0 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 46 03 9 16 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 0 46 04 2 0 15 \\} 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 ~ 11 48 ~ ~ 05 5 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 47 K 0 0 11 9 2 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 39 p 0 0 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 40 GIBBS TOTAL: 11 2 90 79 6 5 0 1 0 0 58 52 5 2 311 ~\nz 10/1212011 Department of Computer Information Services Page Bof 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1028-CHICOT I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 74 68 23 27 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 203 02 0 0 59 61 26 24 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 175 K 0 0 73 ~ 64 25 30 0 0 0 0 4 ~ 6 2 2 206 p 55 71 41 31 0 0 0 3 3 4 212 CHICOT TOTAL: 2 2 261 264 115 112 1 0 0 0 17 13 6 3 796 (lo 1029-WEST HIL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 13 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 40 02 0 0 15 14 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 7 2 47 03 0 0 14 ~ 19 7 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 44 04 0 0 19 \" 17 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 M 2 0 0 45 t\\ 'X\\ 05 0 0 17 21 2 3 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 50 K 0 0 11 18 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 39 p 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 WEST HIL TOTAL: 0 0 97 110 21 19 0 0 0 0 15 17 2 4 285 7~% 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 9 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1030-JEFFRSN !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 22 0 64 02 0 9 6 0 0 0 0 24 32 0 75 03 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 33 0 0 69 04 0 5 i: 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 ~ 15 :~0 50 05 0 0 5 ()a 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 ro 30 0 61 K 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 23 0 59 p - 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 11 0 0 40 /17., JEFFRSN TOTAL: 3 4 36 44 2 1 1 0 0 0 158 166 1 2 418 032-DODD GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 14 9 8 8 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 44 02 0 9 10 12 8 0 0 0 0 44 03 0 10 rr 12 11 8 0 0 0 0 4 '~ 49 04 0 0 20 19 13 8 0 0 0 0 2 I ) 0:) 0 0 63 ::\\s 05 0 0 14 15 5 6 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 0 51 K 0 0 8 8 10 16 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 47 p 0 0 18 17 10 6 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 60 DODD TOTAL: 0 2 93 90 69 60 0 0 0 0 14 19 6 5 C.3:8 ~\n!, 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information SeNices Page 10of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1033-MEADCLIF !GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 21 21 4 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 54 02 0 0 22 14 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 03 0 0 17 18 6 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 50 04 0 0 18 '\\ 15 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 o, 2 0 '\\ 0 43  05 0 0 21 l.rb1 8 1 7 0 0 0 0 2 ~\\ 0 \" 4 0 53 K 0 0 25 i'\\ 26 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o 58 p 0 0 12 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,. MEADCLIF TOTAL: 0 0 136 115 23 30 0 0 0 0 8 11 1 0 11 ~ 035-M L KING GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM 01 0 0 41 39 3 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 91 02 0 0 38 43 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 87 03 0 36 !~ 51 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 O(\"J\\. 0 95 ~ \u0026lt; 04 0 45 33 3 0 0 0 0 2 th 2 0 88 Q 05 0 0 44 41 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 92 K 0 0 42 41 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 88 1, p 0 0 28 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 ~? M L KING TOTAL: 1 1 274 278 8 4 0 2 0 0 15 15 2 1 (:o/ 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 11 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1036-ROCKFELR I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 25 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 58 02 0 0 23 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 03 0 0 17 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 43 04 0 0 19 ~t 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 ' 0 ,,,.~, 39 ' 05 0 0 21 23 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 48 K 0 0 29 24 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 58 p 0 45 44 3 2 0 2 0 0 14 13 2 127 qi)\nROCKFELR TOTAL: 0 1 179 176 5 4 1 2 0 0 18 21 4 4 415 ( 1037-GEYER SP I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 02 0 0 12 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 03 0 0 10 ()-._ 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04 0 0 23 ' 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 ~ 0 0 50 05 0 0 7 15 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 K 0 0 15 16 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 38 p 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 GEYER SP TOTAL: 0 0 98 101 5 12 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 tt'1  10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 12 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1038-PUL HT E I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 3 9 6 0 0 0 0 11 16 0 0 47 02 0 1 10 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 11 50 03 0 10 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 15 21 0 0 63 04 0 0 14 ~ 12 2 0 0 0 0 15 21 2 Q'. 0 67 05 2 0 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 9 15 0 0 61 K 2 0 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 14 6 0 0 40 ..Jl1 PUL HT E TOTAL: 4 5 68 65 3 6 0 0 0 0 83 90 3 1 328 1040-ROMINE I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 19 21 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 02 0 0 29 27 3 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 68 03 0 20 i 21 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 53 04 0 0 24 '\\ 18 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 51 05 0 0 26 36 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 72 K 0 0 18 25 7 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 57 p 0 0 17 15 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 1,1. ROMINE TOTAL: 0 1 153 163 25 35 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 392 \\___ 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 13 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1041-STEPHENS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 24 38 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 69 02 0 0 28 30 5 0 0 0 0 0 67 03 0 0 41 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 04 0 0 27 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 05 0 0 33 28 2 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 65 K 0 0 24 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 60 p 0 0 21 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 1e-q? J STEPHENS TOTAL: 1 0 198 200 11 7 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 1 042-WASHNGTN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM 01 0 0 34 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 02 0 0 37 32 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 03 0 35 28 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 69 04 0 0 27 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 05 0 45 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 K 0 33 29 0 0 0 0 0 2 69 p 0 0 14 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 (:\nti~} WASHNGTN TOTAL: 0 3 225 221 4 9 0 1 0 0 3 7 2 2 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 14 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1043-WILLIAMS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 2 2 13 23 0 2 0 0 0 10 9 0 0 62 02 4 4 16 18 0 0 0 0 7 14 0 0 65 03 3 6 16 \\) 19 0 0 0 0 0 14 ~ 9 0 1 69 04 3 4 23 i~ 17 3 3 0 0 0 12 11 i\\ 79 ~ \\J 1 05 4 25 19 0 0 0 12 10 2 0 76 K 2 2 16 21 0 0 0 12 12 2 71 11- WILLIAMS TOTAL: 18 19 109 117 5 9 1 4 0 0 67 65 4 4 422/ 044-WILSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM 01 0 0 17 16 4 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 44 02 0 0 14 19 3 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 43 03 0 0 19  17 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 ~\\. 47 04 0 0 10 ~ A 10 7 5 0 0 0 0 I~ 0 35 05 0 12 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 K 0 0 16 20 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 48 p 0 12 18 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 40 I 1- WILSON TOTAL: 1 1 100 118 21 29 0 0 0 0 12 6 1 4 93 ? 1045-WOODRUFF I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL p 0 4 65 48 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 2 3 132 WOODRUFF TOTAL: 0 4 65 ~ 48 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 ' 7 2 ~ 3 C') 1\u0026gt;!Pfr \" 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 15 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1046-MABEL EL I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 21 25 6 7 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 66 02 0 0 23 21 6 6 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 62 03 0 23 ~ 28 9 10 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 75 04 0 0 28 l 33 6 6 0 0 0 5 '::b 1 0 '. 0 80 05 0 0 24 20 5 4 0 0 0 3 0~ 0 58 K 0 0 20 23 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 p 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 20 ,()\"' MABEL EL TOTAL: 0 1 143 161 38 44 0 2 0 0 17 11 3 1 421 1047-TERRY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 2 0 23 25 7 7 0 0 0 0 5 2 3 75 02 2 18 24 2 5 1 0 0 2 10 1 2 69 03 3 2 27 I 25 7 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 74 04 0 23 19 4 0 1 0 0 6 7 0 \\) 0 62 05 0 23 25 4 3 0 0 0 5 3 0 66 K 0 0 20 31 7 12 0 0 0 4 6 83 p 3 2 17 22 6 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 60 1\n1\" TERRY TOTAL: 11 6 151 171 34 34 2 3 0 1 27 38 3 8 489 \u0026amp; 10/1212011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 16 of 20 Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1048-FULBRIGH I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 7 4 13 14 2 0 0 0 0 27 28 2 0 98 02 2 3 24 19 0 4 0 0 0 0 31 32 0 2 117 03 4 2 9 16 0 2 0 0 18 17 0 71 04 5 28 0--.. 26 0 0 0 17 21 0 J 0 101 05 2 1 23 ~ 19 4 2 0 0 0 0 15 ~ 18 0 85 K 4 13 19 2 0 0 0 0 25 29 0 95 p 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 16 12 0 0 40 ~r FULBRIGH TOTAL: 19 21 115 114 9 12 1 3 0 0 149 157 2 5 607 1049-ROBERTS I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 4 6 17 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 40 51 143 02 8 3 10 20 2 3 0 0 0 42 59 0 149 03 6 3 11 9 0 1 0 0 51 35 1 () 1 120 04 0 1 15 13 0 0 0 0 44 b 41 0 ' 117 05 6 3 20 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 36 110 K 6 1 17 22 4 0 0 0 28 59 2 142 p 4 1 6 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 28 31 0 2 80 ,1~ ROBERTS TOTAL: 34 18 96 97 9 12 1 2 0 1 266 312 5 8 (_861 f 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 17 of 20  Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL loso-OTTER cR I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 32 31 10 3 0 0 0 7 8 94 02 0 0 24 27 4 9 0 0 0 7 6 0 0 78 03 25 35 2 5 0 0 0 4 6 0 81 04 2 25 36 5 7 0 0 0 0 13 ql 7 0 If 0 96 05 2 28 46 3 9 0 0 0 0 4 12 0 106 K -0 0 35 33 11 8 0 0 0 10 11 0 110 11\" OTTER CR TOTAL: 4 4 169 208 35 41 0 4 0 0 45 50 3 2 565) l, / 051-WAKEFIEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 01 0 0 33 17 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 02 0 0 35 29 11 11 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 89 03 0 0 32 38 16 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 04 0 0 36 25 6 13 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 83 05 0 0 32 35 10 12 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 95 K 0 0 29 31 16 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 88 p 0 0 9 17 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 111'1 WAKEFIEL TOTAL: 0 0 206 192 75 75 0 1 0 0 5 8 1 0 052-WATSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM 03 0 0 50 ! 45 18 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 131 04 0 0 53 \") 53 16 17 0 0 0 0 0 \" r, 0 141 ~ 1\"\" I ( 05 0 0 60 45 15 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 ' 137 WATSON TOTAL: 0 0 163 143 49 46 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 I 409 11Jt' 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 18 of 20 ,  Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1703-FELDER MS ,. I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL y 06 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 //,.,, J0crl ~,.p 07 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ccJ\np'\"\u0026gt; 08 0 0 6 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 FELDER MS TOTAL: 0 0 10 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 {'ss 1711-HAMILTONA LC I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 06 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 q'J1. 07 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 08 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 / 09 0 0 41 74 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 119 10 0 0 31 \\i 49 0 0 0 0 0 2 ~ 1 0 b \u0026gt; 0 84 41.,l 11 0 0 21 (b\" 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 47 12 0 0 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 .::JlS HAMILTON ALC TOTAL: 0 0 97 181 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 7 1 0 292 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 19 of 20 -~  Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Enrollment Report With Agency Students FINAL 1725-ALT AGCY I GRADEi AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL fii}\nJ~J'v~' (J, 01 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 I~-)? OJ -i- 02 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 if t:~1,,:\u0026gt;,_ P-v 03 0 0 0~ 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 3 fy (ref?' v 04 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 .:Cl ?--v J\"\"il ),ol J:\\ 05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ll J-1/.., 1 ~- iJ'i) Cf'' 06 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 \\ 07 0 0 0 \" \" 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I P'o 08 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.) ~ ,) ?-v 09 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ~o ? )..'.? 10 0 0 ~ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 V) 2 0 1) 0 8 ~ 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ,---:\n(D K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALT AGCY TOTAL: 0 0 6 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 5V 1767-ACC LP I GRADEi AF AM I BF BM HF HM NF NM PF PM WF WM TF TM TOTAL 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 11 9 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ::'\\ 3 0 '0 0 33 12 0 0 38 \\. 52 7 5 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 ' 0 109 \u0026lt;{?/,\n, ACC LP TOTAL: 0 0 49 71 8 5 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 ~ GRAND TOTAL: 1 288 280 8,523 8,551 1,185 1,257 34 44 3 5 2,551 2,611 129 133 25,59 I , ~/pf'/!_ 10 -11 p I /\n.v /\"I ,,~~ /VI AJ1 \u0026amp; ~i ,\n) g - /~,973 , 1{)/ ~J~ 1 ..:6_.i/8/ 10/12/2011 Department of Computer Information Services Page 20 of 20 SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOL BLDG. CAPACITY PORT. CLASSRMS PORT.CAPACITY TOTAL CAPACITY CENTRAL 2276 20@25 500 2776 J.A. FAIR 1200 8@25 200 1400 HALL 1754 6@25 150 1904 MCCLELLAN 1440 0 0 1440 PARKVIEW 1200 6@25 150 1350 Subtotal 7870 36@25 1000 8870 MIDDLE CLOVERDALE 885 0 0 885 DUNBAR 888 4@25 100 988 FOREST HEIGHTS 780 0 0 780 HENDERSON 960 4@25 100 1060 MABEL VALE 681 12@25 300 981 MANN 900 0 0 900 PULASKI HEIGHTS 858 0 0 858 Subtotal 5952 20@25 500 6452 ELEMENTARY 0 BALE 488 0 0 488 BASELINE 360 0 0 360 BOOKER 645 2@25 50 695 BRADY 528 0 0 528 CARVER 556 1 @25 25 581 CHICOT 749 6@25 150 899 DODD 271 8 (cl) 25 200 471 FAIR PARK ECG 304 0 0 304 FOREST PARK 400 2 (cl) 25 50 450 FRANKLIN 532 0 0 532 FULBRIGHT 565 10@25 250 815 GEYER SPRINGS 358 0 0 358 GIBBS 472 0 0 472 JEFFERSON 471 0 0 471 KING 715 0 0 715 MABEL VALE 443 0 0 443 MCDERMOTT 453 4@25 100 553 MEADOWCLIFF 358 0 0 358 OTTER CREEK 537 6 (cl) 25 150 687 PULASKI HEIGHTS 350 0 0 350 ROBERTS 895 0 0 895 ROCKEFELLER 481 0 0 481 ROMINE 507 0 0 507 STEPHENS 646 0 0 646 TERRY 575 6@25 150 725 WAKEFIELD 607 0 0 607 WASHINGTON 836 0 0 836 WATSON 591 12@25 300 891 WESTERN HILLS 320 0 0 320 WILLIAMS 585 0 0 585 WILSON 340 0 0 340 WOODRUFF - ECC 160 0 0 160 Subtotal Elem. 16098 57@25 1425 17523 Subtotal Mid. 5952 16@25 500 6452 Subtotal H.S. 7870 36@25 1000 8870 Grand Total 29920 107 @25 2925 32845 Alternative Schools HAMILTON 912 0 0 912 FELDER (Badgett) 162 0 0 162 ACC at METRO 250 0 0 250 Alternative Total 1324 0 0 1324 2-24-11 0 Urgent O For Review Subject: Comments: Maintenance \u0026amp; Operations Department 3601 South Bryant Street Little Rock, AR 72204 Office: (501) 447-5250 Fax: (501) 447-5251 FAX From: D Plffse Comment D Please Reply .. ~ ~ Faxed to phone # ~ 7/ - 0 / 00 Date: ---r.././. .:U.~1R__ /,2,_/ _,,.._/.,....L..+------ Number of pages including cover sheet: ~\"'-'~---- 11/18/2011 13:36 5014472951 LRSD SRO PAGE 01/01 ~o 11-12 SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOL BLDG, CAPACll'Y PORT. CLASSRMS PORT.CAPN\nfrY TOTAL CAPACfTY CENTRAL 2276 20 l'!D25 500 2776 J.A. FAIR 1200 8t!i25 200 1400 HALL 1754 2[6)25 50 1804 MCCLELLAN 1440 0 0 144-0 PARKVI~ 1200 6@25 150 1350 Subtotal 7870 32@25 900 ano MIDDlE CLOVERDALE 885 0 0 885 DUNBAR 888 4@25 100 988 FOREST HEIGHTS 780 0 0 780 HENDERSON 860 4@25 100 1060 MABELVALE 681 8@25 200 881 MANN 900 0 0 900 PUU\\SKI HEJGHTS 858 0 0 858 Subto(aJ 5952 16(.6225 \"o 6352 ELEMENTARY 0 BALE 488 0 0 488 BASELINE 360 0 0 360 BOOKER 645 2@25 50 895 BRADY 528 0 0 528 CARVER 556 1 !25 2S 581 CHICOT 749 61 25 150 899 0000 271 8 25 200 471 FAIR PARK ECC 304 0 0 304 FOREST PARK 400 2@25 50 450 FRANKLIN 532 0 0 532 FULBRIGtiT 565 10 flil 25 250 815 GEYER SPRINGS 358 0 0 358 GIBBS 472 0 0 472 JEFFERSON 471 0 0 471 KING 715 0 0 715 MABELVALE 443 0 0 443 MCDERMOTT 453 4@.25 100 553 MEADOWCUFF 358 0 0 358 OTTERCREEK 537 4Cal25 100 837 PULASKI HEIGHTS 350 0 0 350 ROBERTS 895 0 0 895 ROCKEFELLER 481 0 0 481 ROMINE 507 0 0 507 STEPHENS 646 0 0 648 TERRY 575 6@25 150 725 WAKEFIELD 607 0 0 607 WASHINGTON 836 0 0 836 WATSON 5g1 12 Cal 25 300 891 WESTERN HILLS 320 0 0 320 WILLIAMS 585 0 0 585 WILSON 340 0 Q 340 WOODRUFF  ECC 160 0 0 180 Subtotal E14Mn. 1to98 55 D 25 1375 17473 Subtotal Mid. ffl2 16 ~ 25 400 8352 Subtotal H.S.. 1870 !38 ~ 25 900 sno Grand Total 29920 107 I :il 25 2675 32595 HAMILTON 912 0 0 912 FELDER (Badgett) 162 0 0 162 ACCatMETRO 250 0 0 250 Alternatlva Total 1324 0 0 1324 2-24- 1 SCHOOL CAPACITIES HIGH SCHOOL BLDG. CAPACITY PORT. $RMS PORT.CAPACITY TOT AL CAPACITY CENTRAL 2276 2 25 500 2776 J.A. FAIR 1200 8 25 200 1400 HALL 1754 2 25 50 1804 MCCLELLAN 1440 0 0 1440 PARKVIEW 1200 6 25 150 1350 Subtotal 7870 32 25 900 8770 MIDDLE CLOVERDALE 885 0 885 DUNBAR 888 4 25 100 988 FOREST HEIGHTS 780 0 780 HENDERSON 960 4 25 100 1060 MABELVALE 681 8 25 200 881 MANN 900 0 0 900 PULASKI HEIGHTS 858 0 0 858 Subtotal 5952 16 25 400 6352 ELEMENTARY 0 BALE 488 0 0 488 BASELINE 360 0 0 360 BOOKER 645 2 25 50 695 BRADY 528 0 0 528 CARVER 556 1 25 25 581 CHICOT 749 6 25 150 899 DODD 271 8 25 200 471 FAIR PARK ECC 304 0 0 304 FOREST PARK 400 2 25 so 450 FRANKLIN 532 0 0 532 FULBRIGHT 565 10 25 250 815 GEYER SPRINGS 358 0 0 358 GIBBS 472 0 0 472 JEFFERSON 471 0 0 471  KING 715 0 0 715 MABELVALE 443 0 0 443 MCDERMOTT 453 4 25 100 553 MEADOW CLIFF 358 0 0 358 OTTERCREEK 537 4 25 100 637 PULASKI HEIGHTS 350 0 0 350 ROBERTS 895 0 0 895 ROCKEFELLER 481 0 0 481 ROMINE 507 0 0 507 STEPHENS 646 0 0 646 TERRY 575 6 25 150 725 WAKEFIELD 607 0 0 607 WASHINGTON 836 0 0 836 WATSON 591 12 25 300 891 WESTERN HILLS 320 0 0 320 WILLIAMS 585 0 0 585 WILSON 340 0 0 340 WOODRUFF - ECC 160 0 0 160 Subtotal Elem. Subtotal Mid. Subtotal H.S. 16098 55 25 1375 17473 q~ 5952 16 25 400 6352 7870 36 25 900 8770 ,::\u0026gt; Grand Total 29920 107 25 2675 32595 f\u0026gt;O HAMILTON FELDER Badgett 912 0 0 912 ~1 162 0 0 162 I f ACCat METRO 250 0 0 250 Alternative Total 1324 0 0 1324 2-24-11 Oct 3 2011 HIGH SCHOOLS B CENTRAL 1305 FAIR 763 HALL 925 MCCLELLAN 808 PARKVIEW 574 ACC 120 HAMITLO N/SWLA 278 FELDER ALT. AGENCIES ,~ .Jf SUBTOTAL 4789 --/7H MIDDLES CHOOLS CLOVERDALE 514 DUNBAR 679 FORESTH EIGHTS 494 HENDERSON 571 MABEVLA LE 572 MANN 444 PULASKHI EIGHTS 384 HAMITL ON/ SWLA FELDER v57 ALT. AGENCIES v-11 SUB TOTAL 3726 S,.e--Jo?,.,.J _\n,.~ ELEMENTARY ' b',-1.\n5.\nl BALE 287 BASELINE 162 BOOKER 324 BRADY 274 CARVER 246 CHICOT 525 DODD 183 FAIR PARK 80 FORESTP ARK 56 FRANKLIN 321 FULBRIGHT 229 GEYERS PRINGS 199 GIBBS 169 JEFFERSON 80 KING 552 MABEVLA LE 304 MCDERMOTT 292 MEADOWCLIFF 251 OTTERCREEK 377 PULASKHI EIGHTS 133 ROBERTS 193 ROCKEFELLER 355 ROMINE 316 STEPHENS 398 TERRY 322 WAKEFIELD 398 WASHINGTON 446 WATSON 306 WESTERNH ILLS 207 WILLIAMS 226 WILSON 218 WOODRUFF 113 ALT. AGENCIES 18 E SUB TOTAL 8559 7,?3/1 GRANDT OTAL 17074 LRSDO FFICIAEL NROLLMENT 2011-12v s.2 010-11 Octobe3r , 2011v s.O ctobe1r , 2010 Oct 1 2010 w 0 TOTAL % BLK B 829 285 2419 53.9% 1355 45 64 872 87.5% 763 65 206 1196 77.3% 993 40 73 921 87.7% 814 341 150 1065 53.9% 599 11 13 144 83.3% 162 10 4 292 95.2% 198 65 ~ 5 0 ,\no.,21' 76.2% 15 1346 795 6930 69.1% 4964 /3-1-// 7\"1.5 C..,.\u0026lt;/10 (.., .,,, 21 113 648 79.3% 463 65 70 814 83.4% 700 45 53 592 83.4% 479 39 66 676 84.5% 593 51 90 713 80.2% 572 258 98 800 55.5% 443 397 49 830 46.3% 398 78 v1 v1 ~59 96.6% 16 -4 v-0 v15 73.3% 11 881 540 5147 72.4% 3753 nt,. a~~ 5o7~ .1.\ni?. :\n. .:\nJI 7 l,~-\nji /~'l.'t\u0026gt;:J \"/0 f 37 52 376 76.3% 294 20 142 324 50.0% 147 146 81 551 58.8% 319 27 48 349 78.5% 267 119 52 417 59.0% 271 30 241 796 66.0% 487 33 142 358 51.1% 200 83 15 178 44.9% 72 357 30 443 12.6% 69 14 10 345 93.0% 302 306 72 607 37.7% 182 12 17 228 87.3% 212 110 32 311 54.3% 165 324 14 418 19.1% 77 30 19 601 91.8% 569 28 89 421 72.2% 298 42 57 391 74.7% 297 19 54 324 77.5% 241 95 93 565 66.7% 374 173 22 328 40.5% 142 578 90 861 22.4% 148 39 21 415 85.5% 307 15 61 392 80.6% 338 12 20 430 92.6% 407 65 102 489 65.8% 285 13 152 563 70.7% 433 10 21 477 93.5% 496 6 97 409 74.8% 278 32 46 285 72.6% 219 132 64 422 53.6% 218 18 57 293 74.4% 215 9 10 132 85.6% 115 1 0 11 Jf3 94.4% 21 2935 2023 13517 63.3% 8465 ~'1!5-1/ ~.c\n:v, /.!'9ll', (,.~/. 5162 3358 25594 66.7% 17182 w 0 TOTAL BLK 869 232 2456 55.2% 50 54 867 88.0% 87 198 1278 77.7% 39 95 948 85.9% 391 126 1116 53.7% 15 17 194 83.5% 17 3 218 90.8% 2 1 68 95.6% 3 0 18 83.3% 1473 726 7163 69.3% 21 109 593 78.1% 84 60 844 82.9% 59 40 578 82.9% 45 76 714 83.1% 50 76 698 81.9% 279 107 829 53.4% 435 48 881 45.2% 8 2 88 88.6% 0 1 17 94.1% 6 0 17 64.7% 987 519 5259 71.4% 23 47 364 80.8% 12 118 277 53.1% 167 68 554 57.6% 22 38 327 81.7% 132 46 449 60.4% 31 239 757 64.3% 39 119 358 55.9% 89 19 180 40.0% 350 30 449 15.4% 8 10 320 94.4% 326 63 571 31.9% 6 22 240 88.3% 104 37 306 53.9% 339 12 428 18.0% 46 20 635 89.6% 38 65 401 74.3% 53 62 412 72.1% 24 47 312 77.2% 98 90 562 66.5% 167 24 333 42.6% 487 67 702 21.1% 49 18 374 82.1% 16 62 416 81.3% 11 20 438 92.9% 99 108 492 57.9% 11 134 578 74.9% 13 25 534 92.9% 15 110 403 69.0% 29 43 291 75.3% 125 73 416 52.4% 22 56 293 73.4% 4 7 126 91.3% 2 0 23 91.3% 2957 1899 13321 63.5% 5417 3144 25743 66.7% LEA: 6002000 White Black cmmm ffm:jj M F M F ~ R 27 28 208 211 13 tDl 120 105 205 187 m D 127 111 206 203 m [ffl!J 116 114 212 187 00 m 122 120 195 184 tm rfilfl 120 100 189 196 '/. li1:I r:m 93 104 192 172 1/~~ /'t ... ,./ .!:l.''' \"-.'? {[3 ~ 79 86 206 192 (fj/ ~ 120 97 189 182 /i1'J. ~ 1 (le\n117 174 183 o?r\u0026gt; )r:!J ~I)~' ,~ (, I\u0026gt; ~ 123 111 277 215 lmJ ~ 137 125 165 172 1m ~ 105 116 159 209 m ffl\n90 118 119 164 1? ~_Ll, -., r\u0026gt; j r:, J\u0026lt;L\nr ~ ( l:Iffil 1484 1452 2696 2657 ~ ~ 1457 1424 2488 2446 32.32% 58,93% North Little Rock School District October 1, 2011 Count Hispanic Asian M F M F 28 29 4 2 19 26 6 6 21 26 8 8 21 23 1 8 30 29 1 6 25 24 7 3 22 20 5 4 .Jj\n_ -1/ 29 27 2 4 14 17 3 3 29 15 6 3 It,, I 33 27 2 4 15 15 7 5 14 21 9 2 17 13 3 2 I G '-I 317 312 64 60 289 283 60 58 6.93% 1.37% Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 n 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 C 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 14 2 4 4 3 13 14 1 4 4 2 0.31% 0.07% 0.08% LEA: 6002050 North Little Rock School District Amboy Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 20 1 2 5 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 51 8 6 -20 11 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 01 48 8 0 17 20 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 68 13 7 20 21 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 53 7 5 24 10 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 57 7 3 20 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 55 3 8 0 19 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 352 47 31 126 109 21 15 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 332 46 29 121 99 19 15 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 22.16% 66.76% 10.23% 0.00% 0.85% 0.00% 0.00% 1 ?-/Jj C, 1 ~ LEA: 6002053 North Little Rock School District Belwood Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F K 27 2 2 10 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 23 1 9 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 12 0 0 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 27 2 1 12 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 18 2 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 24 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 131 / 7 6 55 56 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.92% 84.73% 5.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7/137/J 1-:j I I I 1 LEA: 6002054 North Little Rock School District Boone Park Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 56 2 3 26 19 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 59 3 2 28 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 59 3 1 23 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 50 2 1 21 23 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 -\u0026lt;,50 2 1 21 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 43 2 0 22 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 45 0 4 24 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals .. -362 14 12 165 154 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 306 12 9 139 135 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.18% 88.12% 4.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1/J1~, ~~ 9,1 11 LEA: 6002055 North Little Rock School District Crestwood Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade. Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F K 74 19 26 12 11 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 01- 88 32 23 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 - --~-79 28 29 8 9 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 03 77 26 30 7 10 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 74 28 20 11 11 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 71 24 28 8 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals - 463 157 1 6 63 2 1 7 12 0 3 0 0 1 0 67.60% 26.78% 0.65% 4.10% 0.65% 0.00% 0.22% J l 7o 1'/ I~ ? LEA: 6002056 North Little Rock School District Glenview Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 19 0 1 8 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 40 3 5 12 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 28 3 4 10 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 27 1 1 11 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 24 0 2 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 25 1 0 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 22 1 1 7 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 185 9 14 61 93 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 166 9 13 53 86 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.43% 83.24% 4.32% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ~~7# 't~ 1fl' 1) LEA: 6002057 North Little Rock School District Indian Hills Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 42 28 11 11 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 38 39 10 8 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 28 39 18 11 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 44 10 10 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 41 33 15 12 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 33 12 11 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 212 216 7 63 3 8 8 3 1 1 1 0 0 71.69% 23.28% 1.34% 2.68% 0.67% 0.34% 0.00% c..\n)~'}p .i.- (Jv t 9' 9v LEA: 6002058 North Little Rock School District Lakewood Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F K 54 23 10 9 8 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 73 20 26 10 9 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 75 25 27 15 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 71 21 21 13 9 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 04 83 26 28 11 12 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 73 20 18 19 12 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 429 135 130 77 52 6 14 4 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 61.77% 30.07% 4.66% 3.03% 0.23% 0.00% 0.23% 9r\nJl, 3ll'\u0026gt; l /? ( J? LEA: 6002059 North Little Rock School District Poplar Street Middle October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 79 85 194 191 28 26 2 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 79 85 194 191 28 26 2 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 26.75% 62.81% 8.81% 0.98% 0.65% 0.00% 0.00% u'9 7 , } { I., ~1/~ (/ LEA: 6002060 Grade. - iJ Totali ~K .. 40 K  .  41 01 ,J_:52 02 -~: 40 03 04 05  .. 35 Totals~ ,280 w/o PK 24_0 -.:~,, /l ,,,, White F 2 1 3 4 2 3 3 0 5 1 4 0 1 0 20 9 18 8 10.36% ,,, North Little Rock School District Lynch Drive Elementary October 1, 2011 Count Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F M F M F M F 19 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 21 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 137 106 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 118 89 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 86.79% 2.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.36% :)\n\u0026lt; LEA: 6002061 North Little Rock School District Meadow Park Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 20 1 0 12 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 21 0 1 12 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 3i 1 0 13 13 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 ' 32 1 3 17 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 36 1 0 16 17 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 '.21 0 1 10 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 ' 25 1 0 15 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 186 5 5 95 70 1 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 166 4 5 83 64 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.38% 88.71% 4.84% 1.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% _,., \" { LEA: 6002063 North Little Rock School District North Heights Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 3 2 7 9 6 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K. 67 6 7 18 20 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 57 3 2 21 12 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02  59 2 5 22 17 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 69 11 1 15 18 9 13 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 04 71 3 0 26 23 10 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 05 63 3 6 21 19 8 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 426 31 23 130 118 50 68 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 386 28 21 123 109 44 57 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 12.68% 58.22% 27.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.00% 0.00%\ng/1 I '1 1.)- ,:\n~ fjh LEA: 6002064 North Little Rock School District Park Hill Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 20 5 3 3 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 59 9 8 21 13 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 51 11 4 15 14 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 47 7 1 13 19 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 49 7 9 12 9 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 55 3 10 13 21 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 30 3 3 6 8 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 311 45 38 83 89 32 21 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 291 40 35 80 84 29 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.69% 55.31% 17.04% 0.96% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% /.1- ~ \"'? ,1-J' 1v LEA: 6002065 North Little Rock School District Pike View Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK 40 3 7 10 8 4 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 39 2 4 14 13 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 53 5 7 14 19 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 57 4 1 21 24 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 57 4 5 18 24 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 47 3 5 15 20 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 48 8 2 17 12 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 341 29 31 109 120 21 20 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 w/o PK 301 26 24 99 112 17 14 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.60% 67.16% 12.02% 2.93% 0.29% 0.00% 0.00% ~{' vo 0 Lt 31-1 jY LEA: 6002067 North Little Rock School District Redwood Preschool October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 10 8 101 109 6 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 10 8 101 109 6 8 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.35% 85.71% 5.71% 0.41% 0.00% 0.41% 0.41% 1Jl)~ \\) / lr 11 LEA: 6002069 North Little Rock School District Seventh Street Elementary October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F PK .-:40 0 1 17 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 K -48 0 2 22 23 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 50 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 ': 38 2 0 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03  39 2 0 21 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 33 0 0 15 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 32 0 0 14 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals ::280 4 3 131 138 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 w/oPK 240 4 2 114 117 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.50% 96.07% 0.71% 0.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 ? .)I LEA: 6002070 North Little Rock School District Lakewood Middle October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 100 86 63 77 5 6 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 90 105 80 76 11 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 191 143 153 16 16 6 6 0 1 0 1 0 2 52.55% 40.83% 4.41% 1.66% 0.14% 0.14% 0.28% ) -1 p -0~l l\n,L( .\u0026gt;Ji LEA: 6002075 North Little Rock School District NLRHS-East Campus October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 09 710 118 109 222 198 28 27 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 537 127 121 103 146 13 12 6 5 0 2 0 2 0 0 Totals 1247 245 230 325 344 41 39 8 9 2 2 0 2 0 0 38.09% 53.65% 6.42% 1.36% 0.32% 0.16% 0.00% 1\" ~ _.\u0026gt;,)'!~ t.,\u0026amp; 1 ,o~ LEA: 6002076 North Little Rock School District NLRHS-West Campus October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/ Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total. M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 09 22 4 1 10 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 71 5 2 37 21 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 620 105 116 147 205 14 20 9 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 512 89 118 108 160 17 13 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 Totals 1225 203 237 302 391 35 36 13 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 35.92% 56.57% 5.80% 1.39% 0.33% 0.00% 0.00% 917 e1flT) \u0026amp; q:/ LEA: 6002076 North Little Rock School District Argenta Academy October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total F M F M F M F M F M F M F 09 62 1 1 45 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 37 2 25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 17 0 0 12 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16 1 0 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 132 7 3 93 25 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.58% 89.39% 3.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% I I D .Ji LEA: 6002077 North Little Rock School District Rose City Middle October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 06 .. 16 0 1 12 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 59 4 3 31 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 61 5 4 29 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 136 9 8 72 43 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.50% 84.56% 2.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11 ~ .11 \u0026lt;6~1 I , 4 LEA: 6002702 North Little Rock School District Ridgeroad Middle Charter October 1, 2011 Count White Black Hispanic Asian Nat Am/Ala Nat Hawaiian/Pac Isl Two or more Grade Total M F M F M F M F M F M F M F 07 224 16 8 95 85 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 08 193 10 8 65 85 17 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 417 26 16 160 170 26 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.07% 79.14% 9.83% 0.72% 0.00% 0.00% 0.24% ,\n,)/ ~?\n0 ) ' /'\nd r\nArkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation BUILDING CAPACITY 2011-2012 Elementary Kindergarten thru 5th Grade # General # Specialty Classrooms Rooms ~rv # General 11-12 Classrooms # of Student 66 30 1683 1225 East Cam us 61 30 1555.5 1247 Lakewood Middle 34 30 867 725 30 30 765 417 16 30 408 136 34 30 867 613 Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation /( {2_~ r-J -).,:,..e_ .=3\u0026lt;:gf J ~ ~ Secondary Total 241 \\. 6145.5 4363 f:--... District Totals 10995.5 8411 \\ /,,t?///? C{/ ~ Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation 11-12 Enrollement % Ca 0 % Caoacitv 73% 80% 84% 55% 33% 71% Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation 71% 76% School Name: ARGENT A ~ADEIJIY Room# Room Type 101 Alternative Room 102 Alternative Room 103 Alternative Room 104 Alternative Room 105 Alternative Room 106 Alternative Room 200A Alternative Room 200 Alternative Room 201 Alternative Room 202 Alternative Room 207 Alternative Room 209 Alternativf? Room 210 Alie rnativ1? F:oom 211 Alt, rnative F!oom 212 Tocdler 213 (1lte:rna.im F!oom 217 1f n1 # General Classroo u _!udent North Little Rock School District BuildingC apacity 1Room# Room Type 1Room# Room Type  I I' I I ' ' I I I I I I Building Totals: I I I, : Room Type Quantity I : Altern ltive Rooms I Toddler 11-12 j Infant Enrollme % I ms Sti,den1\n~ Ca- - nt Caoacitv \" Argenta Ac 15 ,lO ,,,,-? 382.5 ' 132 35 I Total: (1 15 1 1 17 ...... Gary and Polly Ramer From: \"Margie Powell\" \u0026lt;mqpowell@odmemail.com\u0026gt; To: \u0026lt;garynpolly@att.net\u0026gt; Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:09 AM Attach: Capacity Calculator 11-12.xls\nBC-ARGENTA.xis Subject: Fw: Fwd: Building Capacity Let me know if you need anything else. We will use last year's numbers for Redwood. MP From: Tameka White sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:25 PM To: Margie Powell Subject: Fwd: Building capacity Mrs. l\\fargie, Please see below. Let me know if you need anything else. Than.ks, ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Jennifer Estes \u0026lt;estesj@nlrsd.org\u0026gt; Date: Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:17 PM Subject: Building Capacity To: Tameka White \u0026lt;whitet@nlrsd.org\u0026gt; Tameka, Page 1 of2 These are the Building Capacities calculations. Redwood is not calculated because it is not considered \"Academic\". I have each individual building broken down, if you need those numbers - just let me know. I have included the individual spreadsheet for Argenta, since it is considered an Alternative Learning it is not calculated in the Building Capacities either. What you need may be different so I included it. Thanks! Jennifer Estes North Little Rock School District Plant Services P.O. Box 687 North Little Rock, AR 72115 (501) 771.8075 12/1/2011 (501) 771.8079 Fax Tameka L. White Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent North Uttle Rock SchooDl istrict 2700 PoplarS treet North Uttle Rock, AR 72115 Calf. 501-771-8050 Email: whitet@nlrsd.org Visit ur. http://www.nlrsd.org/ Page 2 of2 12/1/2011 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2011 Margie Powell, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Powell: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 www.p cssdo. rg (501) 234-2000 RECra!VED NOV4 - 2011 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMADTfJIOITNO RJNG Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) 2011-2012 October 1 Enrollment Report. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. ~':_~bu \\A-/1~ Brenda Bowles, Ed. D Assistant Superintendent for Equity and Pupil Services C Sam Jones, Attorney October 1 , 2011 Enrollment Cou11ts \\, V LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per 6003090 ADKINS PRE-K CENTER PK 34 36 70 27 28 55 13 22 35 160 School Total ~ ~ 70 ll. l!l ~ 13 22 ~ 160 43.75% ~ 6003092 BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY 01 14 14 28 12 18 30 9 12 21 79 02 12 14 26 24 19 43 17 18 35 104 03 19 19 38 23 21 44 13 11 24 106 04 11 15 26 19 19 38 5 15 20 84 05 15 14 29 7 14 21 8 5 13 63 KF 8 14 22 24 12 36 9 9 18 76 School Total Zl! 90 169 ill 103 212 61 IQ 131 512 33.01% 66.99% 6003093 CRYSTAL HILL ELEMENTARY 01 19 18 37 36 32 68 6 6 12 117 02 26 27 53 33 37 70 2 5 7 130 03 21 17 38 28 36 64 4 2 6 108 04 21 21 42 41 26 67 6 2 8 117 05 29 11 40 30 31 61 2 2 103 KF 12 20 32 36 34 70 8 3 11 113 PK 10 10 20 5 7 12 6 2 8 40 School Total ill lli ~ m m ill ll ~ ~ 728 ~ 64.01% 6003094 BA YOU METO ELEMENTARY 01 2 20 23 43 2 2 47 02 2 3 5 27 24 51 2 2 4 60 03 3 3 24 27 51 2 56 04 2 18 23 41 3 4 47 05 2 2 24 22 46 2 50 KF 0 26 27 53 2 2 55 PK 10 9 19 0 20 School Total l! 6 ~ 149 155 304 5 11 16 335 4.48% 95.52% 6003095 CLINTON MAGNET ELEMENTARY 01 23 35 58 18 22 40 6 6 12 110 02 19 27 46 24 29 53 5 7 12 111 03 25 27 52 27 18 45 4 6 10 107 04 26 26 52 27 21 48 3 3 6 106 05 27 24 51 20 11 31 7 2 9 91 KF 20 27 47 36 26 62 7 4 11 120 PK 9 16 25 14 11 25 5 4 9 59 School Total lli m ill 16.6 ill alM ll ll ~ IM ~ ~ 6003099 DUPREE ELEMENTARY 01 23 15 38 13 17 30 3 4 7 75 02 16 23 39 13 11 24 9 4 13 76 03 16 18 34 18 8 26 2 5 7 67 04 19 14 33 15 6 21 6 4 10 64 05 20 14 34 9 12 21 2 4 6 61 KF 29 14 43 18 18 36 11 7 18 97 School Total 123 i. 221 86 u 158 ll l!i 61 440 50.23% 49.77% 6003102 HARRIS ELEMENTARY Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page 1 of6 October 1, 2011 Enrollment Counts LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per 01 8 19 27 3 3 6 34 02 18 12 30 2 2 4 2 3 37 03 14 16 30 2 2 3 2 5 37 04 11 9 20 2 3 4 5 28 05 9 10 19 4 3 7 27 KF 13 18 31 2 3 5 5 6 42 School Total 73 M 157 1. 12 n. ~ l 21 205 76.59% 23.41% 6003104 LANDMARK ELEMENTARY 01 8 9 15 13 28 9 2 11 48 02 8 7 15 9 12 21 4 4 8 44 03 5 9 14 5 11 16 4 3 7 37 04 10 12 22 7 12 19 4 3 7 48 05 14 8 22 12 11 23 4 5 50 KF 7 11 18 15 14 29 10 11 21 68 PK 4 7 11 8 8 16 7 6 13 40 School Total ~ ~ 111 l1 fil lli ~ ll 11 ill .ll,,1lli 22.J!l.% 6003105 LAWSON ELEMENTARY 01 8 5 13 12 8 20 2 2 35 02 8 3 11 11 16 27 2 2 40 03 5 7 12 15 15 30 2 44 04 5 6 11 12 18 30 2 2 4 45 05 6 6 12 16 21 37 0 49 KF 5 8 13 14 10 24 2 3 40 PK 5 6 7 4 11 2 3 20 School Total ~ ~ Ill fil ~ lli 9 l ~ m .2Mlli 71.43% 6003106 TOLLESON ELEMENTARY 01 13 12 25 20 22 42 4 3 7 74 02 10 14 24 13 12 25 6 2 8 57 03 11 9 20 16 13 29 2 2 51 04 12 17 29 14 14 28 2 3 60 05 14 17 31 11 10 21 4 5 57 KF 17 8 25 28 19 47 9 9 18 90 PK 2 12 2 14 2 2 4 20 School Total Ill Ill 156 114 92 206 Zft ll 47 409 38.14% 61.86% 6003108 OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY 01 7 6 13 16 9 25 3 5 8 46 02 4 7 11 17 16 33 3 2 5 49 03 2 3 11 7 18 3 3 6 27 04 6 3 9 12 4 16 5 6 31 05 4 3 7 17 14 31 7 2 9 47 KF 6 6 15 17 32 6 4 10 48 PK 5 10 15 18 17 35 6 4 10 60 School Total la ~ M ill li 1fil!. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 79.22% 6003110 ROBINSON ELEMENTARY 01 3 4 9 8 17 3 2 5 26 02 2 2 6 6 12 3 4 18 03 2 5 7 13 8 21 3 4 32 Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page 2 of6 October 1, 2011 Enrollment Counts LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per 04 7 7 14 15 11 26 2 42 05 12 5 17 9 13 22 2 41 KF 2 2 4 8 12 3 2 5 19 PK 1 2 3 9 4 13 3 4 20 School Total 'll. 22 ~ 22 fill. m 1Z ft ~ 198 24.75% 75.25% 6003111 SCOTT ELEMENTARY 01 7 3 10 11 6 17 0 27 02 5 5 6 3 9 3 3 17 03 4 4 8 7 5 12 2 2 22 04 5 2 7 4 11 15 23 05 3 7 10 3 4 7 0 17 06 1 4 5 8 8 16 2 2 23 KF 2 4 6 14 10 24 2 32 PK 3 2 5 7 6 13 19 School Total ~ ~ fill. M ~ lli z ~ ll 180 ~ ~ 6003112 SHERWOOD ELEMENTARY 01 10 7 17 18 14 32 6 6 12 61 02 9 5 14 14 17 31 8 4 12 57 03 8 13 21 15 15 30 2 6 8 59 04 10 11 21 15 17 32 4 5 58 05 10 8 18 8 16 24 5 6 48 KF 9 9 18 18 15 33 5 3 8 59 PK 2 4 6 5 9 14 0 20 School Total fill. fil lli 93 103 196 ~ ll 51 362 31.77% 68.23% 6003113 SYLVAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 01 16 16 32 9 11 20 2 2 4 56 02 6 13 19 13 14 27 2 3 49 03 13 10 23 20 11 31 5 4 9 63 04 17 15 32 14 9 23 2 57 05 21 11 32 23 13 36 2 2 70 KF 19 16 35 15 14 29 3 4 68 PK 6 5 11 13 6 19 6 4 10 40 School Total .aa M lli ill Il lli 1Z 1Z ll lli ~ ~ 6003119 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 71 53 124 24 26 50 9 7 16 190 07 70 51 121 30 40 70 10 4 14 205 08 63 54 117 25 27 52 7 5 12 181 School Total ~ 1fil!. ill Zl! ~ lli 12 1!!. ~ ill ~ ll,ll% 6003120 FULLER MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 40 48 88 31 27 58 13 6 19 165 07 51 51 102 32 23 55 9 6 15 172 08 53 55 108 34 28 62 9 6 15 185 School Total 144 lli 298 fil n ill 11 1!!. ~ 522 57.09% 42.91% 6003122 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 71 72 143 78 79 157 11 6 17 317 07 64 71 135 70 66 136 7 10 17 288 08 47 51 98 49 42 91 6 5 11 200 Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page 3 of6 October 1, 2011 Enrollment Counts LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per School Total ill ~ lli fil ill  ~ ll ~ ~ ~ ~ 6003123 JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 09 92 71 163 65 33 98 6 8 14 275 10 75 60 135 28 36 64 3 4 7 206 11 48 69 117 32 46 78 3 4 199 12 64 53 117 42 32 74 6 3 9 200 School Total lli ill ill lli 147 314 1 1 M .fill ~ ~ 6003125 MILLS UNIVERSITY STUDIES HIGH SCHOOL 09 74 51 125 36 33 69 10 7 17 211 10 49 49 98 39 32 71 8 4 12 181 11 56 54 110 27 33 60 9 6 15 185 12 67 46 113 26 27 53 7 9 16 182 School Total ill lQ2 446 ill lli ill M ~ fil!. ill ~ 41.24% 6003126 MAUMELLE HIGH SCHOOL 09 91 84 175 82 71 153 8 7 15 343 10 60 50 110 67 72 139 8 4 12 261 11 45 37 82 30 45 75 5 3 8 165 12 24 28 52 26 33 59 4 3 7 118 School Total lli m 419 ill 221 ill ~ 1I g ill 47.24% ~ 6003127 ROBINSON HIGH SCHOOL 09 36 26 62 45 21 66 8 3 11 139 10 21 18 39 31 26 57 5 3 8 104 11 11 26 37 24 31 55 4 2 6 98 12 26 21 47 37 27 64 2 2 4 115 School Total ~ fil. 185 137 105 242 1l!. 1Q Zft 456 40.57% 59.43% 6003128 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH SCHOOL 09 58 65 123 62 55 117 10 8 18 258 10 44 43 87 44 52 96 8 7 15 198 11 38 47 85 37 39 76 7 6 13 174 12 37 37 74 41 53 94 6 3 9 177 School Total 177 m ill  199 ill ll ~ ~ fil!.Z 45.72% ~ 6003129 CATO ELEMENTARY 01 3 6 9 15 16 31 3 4 44 02 9 8 17 17 17 34 2 3 54 03 6 4 10 18 14 32 2 2 44 04 7 10 17 12 11 23 0 40 05 10 4 14 16 15 31 2 3 48 KF 8 4 12 26 24 50 1 2 64 PK 3 2 5 3 8 11 3 4 20 School Total ~ ~ ~ 107 105 212 lt 1Q 1 314 26.75% 73.25% 6003130 PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY 01 26 15 41 18 15 33 3 8 11 85 02 29 19 48 11 14 25 4 2 6 79 03 24 18 42 7 16 23 4 4 8 73 04 19 23 42 8 13 21 2 1 3 66 05 20 26 46 12 13 25 5 2 7 78 KF 22 19 41 18 9 27 6 4 10 78 Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page4of6 October 1, 2011 Enrollment Counts LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per School Total M.Q lli ~ M fill. jM ~ ll ~ lli ~ ~ 6003135 COLLEGE STATION ELEMENTARY 01 11 9 20 5 1 6 4 4 30 02 15 12 27 6 2 8 1 2 37 03 11 10 21 9 6 15 4 2 6 42 04 13 11 24 8 4 12 2 3 39 05 13 20 33 7 7 14 2 2 49 KF 12 10 22 5 5 2 3 5 32 PK 11 7 18 1 1 20 School Total l! 79 lli !Q ll .fil 12 11 ll ~ ~ 33.73% 6003136 NORTH PULASKI HIGH SCHOOL 09 48 43 91 43 60 103 11 14 25 219 10 45 31 76 51 57 108 6 3 9 193 11 33 35 68 65 52 117 10 6 16 201 12 34 38 72 52 41 93 5 8 13 178 School Total 160 147 307 211 210 421 32 ll ~ 791 38.81% 61.19% 6003137 ARNOLD DRIVE ELEMENTARY 01 3 5 8 10 14 24 6 6 12 44 02 3 4 15 19 34 5 7 12 50 03 3 3 6 17 9 26 3 8 11 43 04 5 3 8 11 3 14 2 4 6 28 05 3 4 6 2 8 0 12 KF 3 6 9 13 7 20 6 5 11 40 PK 3 3 14 10 24 9 4 13 40 School Total 20. ll 42 l! M ~ ll ~ ~ ill ~ ~ 6003139 OAKBROOKE ELEMENTARY 01 25 19 44 28 26 54 99 02 10 18 28 21 21 42 2 6 8 78 03 14 20 34 24 17 41 6 2 8 83 04 17 15 32 35 20 55 0 87 05 21 13 34 19 24 43 4 3 7 84 KF 14 12 26 27 29 56 2 5 7 89 PK 4 4 8 8 14 22 4 6 10 40 School Total lli 1Q1 lQ lli .1fil ill ll ll il ~ ~ U.1.% 6003140 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 26 20 46 49 40 89 3 7 10 145 07 35 26 61 43 42 85 12 9 21 167 08 35 40 75 37 37 74 14 12 26 175 School Total ~ l! m lli ill lli ~ ~ fil ill ~ ~ 6003141 TAYLOR ELEMENTARY 01 31 22 53 25 15 40 5 2 7 100 02 16 19 35 13 14 27 2 2 64 03 28 19 47 10 8 18 2 2 67 04 14 23 37 10 9 19 3 2 5 61 05 21 31 52 9 5 14 4 3 7 73 KF 23 21 44 17 14 31 9 4 13 88 School Total 13.3 lli ill M ~ ill ll ll .3 ill ~ ~ Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page 5 of6 October 1, 2011 Enrollment Counts LEA School Name Grd BM BF BT WM WF WT OM OF OT GT Blk Per NBlk Per 6003142 PINE FOREST ELEMENTARY 01 12 13 25 30 20 50 5 6 81 02 20 9 29 32 35 67 6 2 8 104 03 9 13 22 29 21 50 1 2 3 75 04 11 15 26 27 31 58 3 3 6 90 05 21 16 37 36 31 67 3 4 108 KF 8 9 17 25 22 47 5 5 10 74 School Total fil. ~ ~ lli 1fil! m 1Z 2.9. ll m 29.32% ~ 6003143 ROBINSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 28 29 57 38 39 77 6 8 14 148 07 20 24 44 38 32 70 7 10 17 131 08 20 21 41 31 26 57 5 6 104 School Total .a 74 142 1QI lU. ~ 1!! li ll ill ~ 62.92% 6003146 BATES ELEMENTARY 01 14 11 25 15 18 33 5 7 12 70 02 19 13 32 20 19 39 5 6 11 82 03 11 12 23 13 7 20 8 10 18 61 04 14 23 37 20 13 33 4 11 15 85 05 21 14 35 17 6 23 5 6 11 69 KF 13 17 30 16 11 27 9 13 22 79 PK 7 6 13 8 12 20 1 6 7 40 School Total M. l!.6 m WI .a m ll ~ l!.6 ~ 40.12% ~ 6003149 MAUMELLE MIDDLE SCHOOL 06 59 50 109 97 77 174 14 8 22 305 07 53 62 115 78 79 157 10 10 20 292 08 52 60 112 84 58 142 5 7 12 266 School Total  172 ill .2fil!. ill ill ll ~ M lli ~ ~ 6003150 CHENAL ELEMENTARY 01 6 12 18 23 40 63 5 6 87 02 13 8 21 35 27 62 7 10 17 100 03 16 12 28 29 25 54 8 2 10 92 04 13 11 24 21 36 57 7 7 14 95 05 13 10 23 31 26 57 5 7 12 92 KF 14 15 29 29 25 54 7 3 10 93 School Total ~ .a lli ill lli Hr ~ ~ fill ~ ~ 74.42% Tuesday, November 01, 2011 Page 6of6 .. Oct 1 2011 Enrollment Counts by Grade Black White Other Grade Grd Males Percentage Females Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Total Black Non-Black Elementa!'.Y Totals ... PK 105 117 222 168 156 324 67 65 132 678 32.74% 67.26% .J, KF 258 270 528 441 368 809 123 104 227 1564 33.00% 67.00% {!JO ( l 01 291 265 556 381 371 752 79 88 167 1475 36.86% 63.14% 02 279 262 541 382 386 768 97 91 188 1497 36.07% 63.93% ~~(',+ ,, 03 270 266 536 380 318 698 81 81 162 1396 37.19% 62.81% ~ 04 274 293 567 367 332 699 62 73 135 1401 40.79% 59.21% 05 329 273 602 346 324 670 64 51 115 1387 43.60% 56.40% Totals ... 1701 1629 3330 2297 2099 4396 506 488 994 8720 38.19% 61.81% Totals with PK .. ..uo 4# J/2 2465 2255 -4720 573 3 1126 ---931}8 37-\n8696 62.2696 Middle School r 06 296 276 572 325 296 621 58 42 100 1293 44.24% 55.76% I., 07 293 285 578 291 282 573 55 49 104 1255 45.78% 54.22% 08 270 281 551 260 218 478 46 36 82 1111 49.40% 50.60% Totals ... ~-~01 -- 87fr 6 ff,]2 ~ ..E 286 3659 ~ Sr.51% High School 09 399 340 739 333 273 606 53 47 100 1445 50.56% 49.44% 10 294 251 545 260 275 535 38 25 63 1143 47.11% 52.89% 11 231 268 499 215 246 461 36 26 62 1022 48.06% 51.94% 12 252 223 475 224 213 437 30 28 58 970 47.96% 52.04% Totals ... 1176 1082 2258 1032 1007 2039 157 126 283 4580 49.30% 50.70% r ---, District Totals ... 3841 3670 7511 4373 4058 8431 889 806 1695 17637 42.59% 57.41% Page4 or 5 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 8th Day of School, Enrollment Count, August 24, 2011. PRINCIPALS REPORTING ELEMENTARY Class PRE-K KIND FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH SIXTH TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Capacity Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk (Revised} NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Btk '/4 NonBlack % Total Adkms 526 82 74 156 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 52.6% 74 47.4% 156 Arnold Dr 453 5 35 40 14 26 40 11 30 41 5 44 49 8 36 44 11 15 26 5 8 13 0 0 0 59 23.3% 194 76.7% 253 Baker 428 0 0 0 22 54 76 26 53 79 26 76 102 40 67 107 27 58 85 29 35 64 0 0 0 170 33.1% 343 66.9% 513 Bates 863 14 26 40 36 46 82 26 42 68 34 53 87 22 36 58 40 47 87 35 36 71 0 0 0 207 42.0% 286 58.0% 493 Bavou Meto 697 1 19 20 0 53 53 2 44 46 4 59 63 3 52 55 3 46 49 2 48 50 0 0 0 15 4.5% 321 95.5% 336 Cato 800 4 16 20 14 53 67 9 38 47 18 37 55 12 35 47 17 26 43 13 36 49 0 0 0 87 26.5% 241 73.5% 328 Chenal 550 0 0 0 27 64 91 18 69 87 24 77 101 28 63 91 29 63 92 27 65 92 0 0 0 153 27.6% 401 72.4% 554 C!1nlon 840 29 34 63 49 67 116 60 54 114 50 62 112 56 55 111 54 51 105 54 35 89 0 0 0 352 49.6% 358 50.4% 710 Coll Sta 439 17 2 19 25 8 33 20 12 32 27 10 37 19 18 37 30 15 45 34 16 50 0 0 0 172 68.0% 81 32.0% 253 CrvstalHil 870 20 20 40 37 80 117 39 76 115 54 73 127 40 68 108 45 71 116 41 65 106 0 0 0 276 37.9% 453 62.1% 729 Duoree 498 0 0 0 45 47 92 38 33 71 37 39 76 34 32 66 29 30 59 34 28 62 0 0 0 217 50.9% 209 49.1% 426 H8rris 906 0 0 0 28 11 39 21 17 38 26 9 35 29 7 36 22 7 29 20 8 28 0 0 0 146 71.2% 59 28.8% 205 Jax Elem 850 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 #DIV/0! 0 Landmark 711 11 29 40 18 46 64 10 39 49 17 28 45 14 24 38 20 27 47 24 28 52 0 0 0 114 34.0% 221 66.0% 335 Lawson 372 5 15 20 16 25 41 14 21 35 9 28 37 12 34 46 9 35 44 11 37 48 0 0 0 76 28.0% 195 72.0% 271 Oak Grove 626 19 41 60 6 44 50 16 27 43 9 37 46 4 22 26 9 21 30 7 38 45 0 0 0 70 23.3% 230 76.7% 300 Oakbrooke 553 9 30 39 30 61 91 43 50 93 32 47 79 30 44 74 32 53 85 36 50 86 0 0  0 212 38.8% 335 61.2% 547 Pine Forest 554 0 0 0 20 52 72 25 57 82 27 75 102 22 52 74 26 65 91 39 69 108 0 0 0 159 30.1% 370 69.9% 529 Pmewood 677 0 0 0 39 34 73 43 41 84 46 30 76 40 33 73 41 22 63 51 26 77 0 0 0 260 58.3% 186 41.7% 446 Robinson 544 4 16 20 3 17 20 6 20 26 4 15 19 7 22 29 12 24 36 16 23 39 0 0 0 52 27.5% 137 72.5% 189 Scott 294 5 14 19 5 25 30 10 18 28 7 11 18 9 15 24 8 17 25 11 7 18 5 19 24 60 32.3% 126 67.7% 186 Sherwood 561 6 14 20 19 41 60 18 42 60 13 41 54 21 38 59 18 39 57 20 28 48 0 0 0 115 32.1% 243 67.9% 358 Svtvan Hills 606 13 27 40 32 30 62 31 27 58 18 30 48 23 38 61 32 26 58 28 40 68 0 0 0 1n 44.8% 218 55.2% 395 Tay!or 566 0 0 0 51 43 94 59 43 102 36 29 65 48 20 68 33 27 60 50 22 72 0 0 0 2n 60.1% 184 39.9% 461 Tofleson 561 5 15 20 32 54 86 28 50 78 25 32 57 23 28 51 33 32 65 36 19 55 0 0 0 182 44.2% 230 55.8% 412 Total Bern 15,345 249 427 676 568 981 1549 573 903 1476 548 942 1490 544 839 1383 580 817 1397 623 767 1390 5 19 24 3,690 39.3% 5,695 60.7% 9,385 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 8th Dav of School, Enrollment Count, Auoust 24, 2011. PRINCIPALS REPORTING SECONDARY Class SIXTH SEVENTH EIGHTH NINTH TENTH ELEVENTH TWELFTH TOTAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS Capacity (Revised'! Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT B!k NB TOT Blk NB TOT B!k NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk NB TOT Blk '/4 Non-Black 'I, TOTAL Leaming Academ TBA 1 0 1 7 1 8 7 0 7 0 2 2 1 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 17 TT.3% 5 22.7% 22 Star Academv TBA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 0 #DIV/0! 0 Fuffer Middle 1360 113 85 198 90 69 159 109 81 190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 57.0% 235 43.0% 547 Jax Middle 990 140 77 217 93 61 154 135 66 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 368 64.3% 204 35.7% 572 Jax H1ah 1360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 96 248 143 75 218 117 93 210 138 93 231 550 60.6% 357 39.4% 907 Maumele Middle 840 115 196 311 11  183 297 117 165 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 346 38.9% 544 61.1% 890 MdlsH1oh 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 76 201 97 70 167 114 70 184 119 59 178 455 62.3% 275 37.7% 730 North Pulaski Htah 1050 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 114 207 78 110 188 76 142 218 70 101 171 317 40.4% 467 59.6% 784 Northwood Mid 1030 48 93 141 65 107 172 76 88 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 39.6% 288 60.4% 477 Maumele Hiqh 1130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 156 337 120 147 267 76 85 161 60 72 132 437 48.7% 460 51.3% 897 Robinson Mid 650 61 91 152 51 80 131 51 58 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 41.6% 229 58.4% 392 Robinson Hioh 770 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 73 132 45 70 115 43 68 111 47 71 118 194 40.8% 282 59.2% 476 Svlvan Hills Mid 1080 157 175 332 134 128 262 96 101 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 387 48.9% 404 51.1% 791 Sylvan Hills High 1120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 116 236 100 118 218 88 91 179 83 103 186 391 47.7% 428 52.3% 819 Total Secondary 12.5101 6351 7171 13521 5541 629 11831 591 559 1150 730 633 13631 5841 5921 11761 5151 549 1064 517 499 1016 4,126 49.7% 4,178 50.3',4 8,304 TOTAL ENROLLMENT I 7,816 44.2'/41 9,8731 55.8%1 17,689 Officeo f EducationaAl ccountabthty. Pnnted on 8/24/2011 at 318 PM.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1847","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-09-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1847"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["84 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_crhp_crhp0056","title":"Carrie Lamar Young oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Little Rock, Arkansas, 2011 September 26","collection_id":"loc_crhp","collection_title":"Civil Rights History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Mosnier, Joseph","Young, Carrie Lamar, 1948-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Civil Rights History Project (U.S.)"],"dc_date":["2011-09-26"],"dcterms_description":["Recorded in Little Rock, Arkansas, on September 26, 2011.","Civil Rights History Project Collection (AFC 2010/039), Archive of Folk Culture, American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.","Copies of items are also held at the National Museum of African American History and Culture (U.S.).","Carrie Young was born in 1948 in Barton, Arkansas, married Howard L. Himmelbaum in 1967 and later Carl E. Young, and had one child. She attended the Opportunity Industrialization Center and the University of Arkansas-Little Rock, and worked as a keypunch operator, accounting clerk, publication printing, and in data entry and administrative work.","The Civil Rights History Project is a joint project of the American Folklife Center, Library of Congress and the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of African American History and Culture to collect video and audio recordings of personal histories and testimonials of individuals who participated in the Civil Rights movement.","In English.","Finding aid http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.afc/eadafc.af013005"],"dc_format":["image/gif","image/jpeg","image/jp2","image/tiff","text/xml","application/pdf","application/x-video","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Civil Rights History Project"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Civil Rights History Project, (U.S.) (AFC 2010/039), American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C."],"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","African American civil rights workers--Arkansas--Interviews","Voter registration--Arkansas","Interracial marriage","Discrimination in employment--Arkansas","Black United Youth"],"dcterms_title":["Carrie Lamar Young oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Little Rock, Arkansas, 2011 September 26"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["American Folklife Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.loc.gov/item/afc2010039_crhp0056/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews","transcripts","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["9 video files of 9 (Apple ProRes 422 HQ, QuickTime wrapper) (125 min.) : digital, sound, color. 1 transcript (65 pages)"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Young, Carrie Lamar, 1948- --Interviews","Glascoe, Myrtle Gonza","Hansen, Bill, 1939-","Himmelbaum, Howard"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_oid16_33594","title":"Cody Dickinson, 2011","collection_id":"tws_oid16","collection_title":"Crossroads interviews","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-09-20"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["video/mp4","application/pdf","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/280373379"],"dcterms_subject":["Music","Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)"],"dcterms_title":["Cody Dickinson, 2011"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/33594"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_crhp_crhp0053","title":"David Mercer Ackerman and Satoko Ito Ackerman oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Washington, D.C., 2011-09-20","collection_id":"loc_crhp","collection_title":"Civil Rights History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Mosnier, Joseph","Ackerman, David M.","Ackerman, Satoko Ito, 1939-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":["Civil Rights History Project (U.S.)"],"dc_date":["2011-09-20"],"dcterms_description":["David and Satoko Ackerman recall meeting at the Chicago Theological Seminary and remember their classmate Jesse Jackson urging students to attend the Selma to Montgomery March. They recall traveling to Selma, participating in the march, and their later life in Silver Spring, Maryland."],"dc_format":["image/gif","image/jpeg","image/jp2","image/tiff","text/xml","application/pdf","application/x-video","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Civil Rights History Project"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Civil Rights History Project, (U.S.) (AFC 2010/039), American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C."],"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","Civil rights movements--Alabama","Selma to Montgomery Rights March (1965 : Selma, Ala.)","Seminarians--Interviews","Chicago Theological Seminary"],"dcterms_title":["David Mercer Ackerman and Satoko Ito Ackerman oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Washington, D.C., 2011-09-20"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["American Folklife Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.loc.gov/item/afc2010039_crhp0053/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews","transcripts","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["6 video files of 6 (HD, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, QuickTime wrapper) (62 min.) : digital, sound, color. 1 transcript (30 pages)"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Jackson, Jesse, 1941-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_crhp_crhp0054","title":"Dorie Ann Ladner and Joyce Ladner oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Washington, D.C., 2011-09-20","collection_id":"loc_crhp","collection_title":"Civil Rights History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Mosnier, Joseph","Ladner, Dorie","Ladner, Joyce A."],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":["Civil Rights History Project (U.S.)"],"dc_date":["2011-09-20"],"dcterms_description":["Doris and Joyce Ladner discuss organizing for the March on Washington with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). Dorie Ladner recalls her work with SNCC in Natchez, Mississippi, and the murder and trial of Medgar Evers. They both remember growing up in Palmers Crossing, Mississippi, their family history, joining the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) youth chapter led by Clyde Kennard, and the impact that Emmett Till's murder had on their generation. Doris also recalls attending Tougaloo College, staying at the Freedom House in Jackson, Mississippi, and organizing the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party."],"dc_format":["image/gif","image/jpeg","image/jp2","image/tiff","text/xml","application/pdf","application/x-video","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Civil Rights History Project"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Civil Rights History Project, (U.S.) (AFC 2010/039), American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C."],"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","Civil rights movements--Mississippi","Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","African American civil rights workers--Mississippi--Interviews","Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party","Tougaloo College","March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (1963 : Washington, D.C.)","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Youth Council"],"dcterms_title":["Dorie Ann Ladner and Joyce Ladner oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Washington, D.C., 2011-09-20"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["American Folklife Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.loc.gov/item/afc2010039_crhp0054/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews","transcripts","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["7 video files of 7 (HD, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, QuickTime wrapper) (121 min.) : digital, sound, color. 1 transcript (73 pages)"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Till, Emmett, 1941-1955","Kennard, Clyde","Evers, Medgar Wiley, 1925-1963"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_crhp_crhp0052","title":"Candie Carawan and Guy Hughes Carawan oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in New Market, Tennessee, 2011-09-19","collection_id":"loc_crhp","collection_title":"Civil Rights History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Mosnier, Joseph","Carawan, Guy","Carawan, Candie"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Hamblen County, 36.21715, -83.26666","United States, Tennessee, Jefferson County, New Market, 36.10398, -83.55268"],"dcterms_creator":["Civil Rights History Project (U.S.)"],"dc_date":["2011-09-19"],"dcterms_description":["Candie Carawan recalls attending Fisk University as an exchange student and meeting civil rights activists in Nashville, Tennessee. She discusses meeting Guy Carawan at the Highlander Folk School, the importance of music to the civil rights movement, and Guy's work to record singers involved with the movement. The two perform several songs, including \"Tree of Life,\" \"Eyes on the Prize,\" and \"We Shall Overcome.\""],"dc_format":["image/gif","image/jpeg","image/jp2","image/tiff","text/xml","application/pdf","application/x-video","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Civil Rights History Project"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Civil Rights History Project, (U.S.) (AFC 2010/039), American Folklife Center, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C."],"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","We shall overcome","Civil rights movements--United States--Songs and music","Highlander Folk School (Monteagle, Tenn.)","Folk singers--Interviews","Civil rights workers--Interviews","Fisk University"],"dcterms_title":["Candie Carawan and Guy Hughes Carawan oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in New Market, Tennessee, 2011-09-19"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["American Folklife Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.loc.gov/item/afc2010039_crhp0052/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews","transcripts","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["5 video files of 5 (HD, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, QuickTime wrapper) (54 min.) : digital, sound, color. 1 transcript (29 pages)"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_crhp_crhp0051","title":"Kathleen Cleaver oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Atlanta, Georgia, 2011-09-16","collection_id":"loc_crhp","collection_title":"Civil Rights History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Mosnier, Joseph","Cleaver, Kathleen"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798"],"dcterms_creator":["Civil Rights History Project (U.S.)"],"dc_date":["2011-09-16"],"dcterms_description":["Kathleen Cleaver recalls growing up in Tuskegee, Alabama, India and the Philippines while her father worked for the foreign service. She remembers dropping out of college to work for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) as a secretary, and witnessing the dissolution of that organization. She discusses meeting her husband, Eldridge Cleaver, joining the Black Panther Party, and organizing against police brutality."],"dc_format":["image/gif","image/jpeg","image/jp2","image/tiff","text/xml","application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Civil Rights History Project"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","African American civil rights workers--Interviews","Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","African American college students--Interviews","Black Panther Party","Police brutality","Black nationalism"],"dcterms_title":["Kathleen Cleaver oral history interview conducted by Joseph Mosnier in Atlanta, Georgia, 2011-09-16"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["American Folklife Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.loc.gov/item/afc2010039_crhp0051/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","interviews","transcripts","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["10 video files of 10 (HD, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, QuickTime wrapper) (123 min.) : digital, sound, color. 1 transcript (57 pages)","application/x-video","image/jpg"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Cleaver, Eldridge, 1935-1998"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":208,"next_page":209,"prev_page":207,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":2484,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}