{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"pth_bcja_metapth595284","title":"Barbara Jordan: Statement to the Press","collection_id":"pth_bcja","collection_title":"Barbara C. Jordan Archives","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Texas, 31.25044, -99.25061"],"dcterms_creator":["Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996"],"dc_date":["1988-09-10"],"dcterms_description":["Text of a statement given to the press by Barbara C. Jordan endorsing the Dukakis-Bentsen ticket in the upcoming Presidential election."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":["local-cont-no: TSOU_0445-002-011","ark: ark:/67531/metapth595284"],"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American women politicians--Texas","Speeches, addresses, etc.","United States--Politics and government","Public relations--United States","Elections--United States","Presidents--Election","Democratic Party (U.S.)"],"dcterms_title":["Barbara Jordan: Statement to the Press","Texas Senate Papers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Texas Southern University. Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth595284/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["press releases"],"dcterms_extent":["1 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","Dukakis, Michael S. (Michael Stanley), 1933-","Bentsen, Lloyd"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_abaker_4564","title":"Letter, 1988, Alice R. Bouknight to Augusta Baker","collection_id":"suc_abaker","collection_title":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","dcterms_contributor":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Richland County, 34.0218, -80.90304","United States, South Carolina, Richland County, Columbia, 34.00071, -81.03481"],"dcterms_creator":["Bouknight, Alice R."],"dc_date":["1988-09-10"],"dcterms_description":["Letter from Alice R. Bouknight, Curator of Exhibitions/State Fair Coordinator at McKissick Museum, to Augusta Baker, thanking her for agreeing to provide a story-telling at the 1988 State Fair and provides further details about the event."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998","Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998, Box 2, Folder 137. Accession 11770"],"dcterms_subject":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998--Correspondence","African American women librarians","Children's librarians","African American librarians","Women librarians","Museums--South Carolina","Folklore","Tales","University of South Carolina","McKissick Museum","Bouknight, Alice R.--Correspondence"],"dcterms_title":["Letter, 1988, Alice R. Bouknight to Augusta Baker"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of South Carolina. Libraries"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/abaker/id/4564"],"dcterms_temporal":["1970/2025"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For further information please contact The University of South Carolina, South Caroliniana Library, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":["1 item"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","Bouknight, Alice R."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1104","title":"Long-Range Plan for School Facilities, Little Rock, Arkansas","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1988-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School facilities","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Long-Range Plan for School Facilities, Little Rock, Arkansas"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1104"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLong-Range Plan for  School Facilities Little Rock, Arkansas 1988 Stanton Leggett and Associates West Tisbury, Martha's Vineyard. Ma9s. 0'2575 Educatfonal Coosultants September 1988 Board of Directors Little Rock School District Joyce Kelly-Lewis Director W.D. Hamilton James L. Rutherford Robin Armstrong H.M. Faulkner Patricia Gee Oma Jacovelli Superintendent of Schools Dr. George Cannon RECE~V~D JUN 9 1994 Office of Desegregation Mc,,!tc::n\ni Section 1 Demographic Changes and Future School Enrollments - A Report to the Little Rock School District The Grier Partnership 6532 EASf HALBERT ROAD BETHESDA. MARYLAND 20817 (30 1) 229-4454 DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES AND FUTURE SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS A Report to the Little Rock School District Little Rock, Arkansas Eunice and George Grier The Grier Partnership in collaboration with Stanton Leggett and Associates June 1988 I . INTRODUCTION Objectives of the Demographic Study The demographic study of the Little Rock School District is part of an overall examination of the District's existing physical facilities undertaken by Stanton Leggett and Associates. In order to help determine what types and sizes of facilities will be needed over the next decade or so, it is necessary to know how the school system's pupils are likely to change in numbers, characteristics, and location of residence. As a first step in the demographic study we reviewed recent trends in enrollments and evaluated the accuracy of some past enrollment projections. We then examined some of the external factors which could influence enrollments, such as birth rates and migration patterns, overall population growth, and the economy of the Little Rock area. Because the Little Rock School District recently enlarged its boundaries, acquiring several schools and about 7,000 additional pupils from the Pulaski Special School District, we also assessed the likely impact of this change on future enrollments. Some Special Considerations in the Little Rock Situation Racial Factors For several years the Little Rock School District has been under federal court order to maintain racial balance within its schools. While the racial composition of the schools has shifted slowly in the past several years, there has been a gradual increase both in the number of black pupils attending Little Rock schools and in their proportion of total enrollment. In 1980-81 black enrollment totalled about 13,000 or 63.6 percent of the total enrollment of 20,500. By the 1986-87 school year the number of black pupils had grown to almost 13,800 out of a total of 19,300\nthey were 71,3 percent. (See Table 1.)* TABLE 1 ENROLLMENTS BY RACE 1980-81 TO 1987-88 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Year Black Nonblack Total % Black 1980-81 13,009 7,446 20,455 63.6% 1981-82 13,004 6,743 19,747 65.9% 1982-83 13,238 6,064 19,302 68.6% 1983-84 13,355 5,722 19,077 70.0% 1984-85 13,466 5,450 18,916 71.2% 1985-86 13,644 5,479 19,123 71.3% 1986-87 13,769 5,536 19,305 71.3% 1987-88 16,101 10,479 26,580 60.6% Source: Little Rock School District, October 1 enrollments. In both 1980-81 and 1986-87 the proportion of black pupils was highest in the early grades and lowest in the high school years. However, racial change at all grade levels has been slow. Both total enrollment and white* enrollment reached their lowest points in 1984-85 and began climbing again thereaf-ter. In order to meet the conditions of racial balance set down in the latest federal court order, Little Rock pupils are assigned to schools based on parents' expressed preferences and desegregation guidelines set by the court. *There will sometimes be small differences between enrollment numbers cited in this report for the same year. The differences occur because they have been taken from different source materials furnished by the school system and were assembled at different points in the school year. **Although there are a handful of nonblack nonwhite children in the Little Rock School District, for all practical purposes the terms \"white\" and \"nonblack\" are synonymous and are used interchangeably in this report. -2- Since the racial balance requirements are likely to remain in force for some years, the projection methodology must consider not only the size of the pupil population by race, but also its projected location within the district. Expanded Boundaries Until Fall 1987, the Little Rock School District took in only about twothirds of the land area and child population included in the city of Little Rock. The remainder of Little Rock, together with other parts of Pulaski County south of the Arkansas River, was served by the Pulaski Special School District. By order of the federal court, the boundaries of both districts were changed effective in school year 1987-88. This change brought about 7,000 more pupils into the Little Rock Distric~, and made its boundaries virtually contiguous with those of the city. It also reduced the percentage of blacks in the district's population to 60.6 percent--three percentage points below their proportion in 1980. As in the earlier years, the black proportion was highest in the early grades (65.1 percent) and lowest at the high school level (50.1 percent). We could obtain almost no historical data to help judge what changes in school enrollments are likely to occur in the annexed territory. Metroplan estimates for 1986 indicate that much of the total population growth in the city of Little Rock took place in the annexed school territory, and Metroplan projects further growth in the years ahead. A comparison of 1980 census data with 1987 school data suggests that both black and nonblack pupils have increased in some parts of the annexed territory since 1980. Since we have no data for intervening years, however, .there is no way of telling whether the increases occurred in the early years of the decade but have now halted for one or both racial groups, or whether they have occurred more recently, or have taken place at a constant pace throughout the period. Nor can we obtain census data on the child population by race for census -3- tracts in which the total black population numbered fewer than 400 persons in 1980, even though they may have grown since then. Several of these tracts are in the annexed school territory. -4- II. Recent Trends in School Enrollment Trends in the System as a Whole (Old boundaries) Overall, the Little Rock School District's enrollment declined somewhat during the early years of the 1980s decade, as Table 1 indicated. From almost 20,500 in 1980-81, it dropped to about 18,900 in 1984-84--a decrease of about 1,600 pupils or 7.5 percent. In recent years, however, the trend has been reversed. Small gains were registered in 1985 and again in 1986, making up for some of the losses in the early 1980s. By 1986-87 enrollment was up to 19,300, 5.6 percent below 1980. In 1987 the enrollment again increased. This time, however, the reason was an expansion in the District's boundaries which added about 7,000 pupils from the Pulaski Special District. Some grade levels reached their lowest points earlier than others. The first to bottom out were the junior high grades (7-9), which had their lowest enrollment in the 1982-83 school year. Kindergarten was next in 1983-84, followed by the primary grades (1-3) and high school (10-12) in 1984-85. The intermediate grades (4-6) were the last to reach bottom in 1985-86. All but kindergarten and the junior high years increased their enrollments in the last year before the District was enlarged. (See Table 2 and Figure 1.) Racial Differences in Enrollments (old boundaries) Except for Grades 1 to 3, all grade levels from kindergarten to high schools had larger black enrollments in 1986-87 than in 1980-81, although the change from year to year was rarely very large. Overall, the number of black pupils increased by less than 800 in the six-year period, or by 5.8 percent. The number of white pupils, on the other hand, was smaller in 1986 than in 1980 at every level except kindergarten. The changes were also greater as -5- TABLE 2 TRENDS IN ENROLLMENT BY RACE 1980-81 TO 1986-87 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BLACK PUPILS GRADES 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 K 1,120 1,072 1,141 1,059 1,142 1,211 1,160 1-3 3,800 3,842 3,815 3,768 3,754 3,728 3,729 4-6 2,879 2,987 3,136 3,264 3,243 3,237 3,267 7-9 2,712 2,679 2,735 2,871 2,960 3,099 3,086 10-12 2,498 2,424 2,411 2,393 2,367 2,369 2,527 TOTAL 13,009 13,004 13,238 13,355 13,466 13,644 13, 769 NONBLACK PUPILS GRADE 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 K 434 459 420 413 393 429 475 1-3 1,636 1,276 1,114 1,069 1,077 1,104 1,159 4-6 1,645 1,430 1,191 1,083 971 915 926 7-9 1,627 1,650 1,574 1,540 1,450 1,363 1,257 10-12 2,104 1,928 1,765 1,617 1,559 1,668 1,719 TOTAL 7,446 6,743 6,064 5,722 5,450 5,479 5,536 TOTAL ENROLLMENT GRADE 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 K 1,554 1,531 1,561 1,472 1,535 1,640 1,635 1-3 5,436 5,118 4,929 4,837 4,831 4,832 4,888 4-6 4,524 4,417 4,327 4,347 4,214 4,152 4,193 7-9 4,339 4,329 4,309 4,411 4,410 4,462 4,343 10-12 4,602 4,352 4,176 4,010 3,926 4,037 4,246 TOTAL 20,455 19,747 19,302 19,077 18,916 19,123 19,305 SOURCE: Little Rock School District, October 1 enrollment. (J) ..-i ...... 6600 6200 5800 25400 4- 0 ~ 5000 E :) z 4600 Figure 1 TRENDS IN TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY GRADE LEVELS - 1980-81 TO 1987-88 1 1/ /\n/ / . jl/ . I /I/ /\n'/ .1/ / l' I / ----~ - I  / ---:-------- - - - - - - - - J/1 4200 - ------- -~ ---=-=---- - ==--- -===-- - - - - - - - - f ------------ ------- -------------~-:::-:::i --- ----- - -- - --- ----------------- 3800--i----------r------.--------,------,--- - - ---,---- - -r-- ----, 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 School Years 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 well, although still quite gradual. By Fall 1986 there were about 1,900 fewer white pupils enrolled in the Little Rock School District than in Fall 1980, for a drop of 25.7 percent or roughly 4.5 percent per year. However, all grade levels except 7-9 had begun to see their white pupil enrollments grow again by the 1986-87 school year. White students in the primary grades (1-3) reached their low point in 1983-84, and began to climb thereafter. Kindergarten and high school both saw their white pupil populations begin to grow again the following fall. White enrollment in the latter continued to grow in 1986-87, as it did in the primary grades. Whites in grades 4-6 dropped continuously through 1985-86, then gained slightly in 1986-87. (See Figures 2 and 3.) Hence the white decline appears to have leveled off, and may even have been reversed, before the court decision added pupils from the Pulaski Special District. Locational Differences (old boundaries) Historical data by geocode area of residence within the District were furnished by the school system for each individual grade. These were combined for our analysis in two ways. The first was by grade levels--kindergarten, primary (grades 1-3), intermediate (4-6), junior high (7-9), and high school (10-12). Second, in order to make the analysis more manageable, the individual geocodes were combined into subgroups--e.g. all geocodes beginning with 01 were combined under Group 01, all beginning with 02 under Group 02, and so on. We then chose Primary grades 1-3 and High School grades 10-12 for further examination and compared the changes in enrollees at these two grade levels from Fall 1979 to Fall 1987. The data for these levels have been mapped, and the results are shown in Figures 4 through 9. Within the old district boundaries, total enrollments in both grade levels declined substantially (more than 100 pupils) in some neighborhoods close to -6- 4600- 4200- Figur8 2 TRENDS IN BLACK ENROLLMENT BY GRADE LEVELS - 1980-81 TO 1987-88 38oot--------------------------\" / / / (J) // / ~..... / / // J3400 // 4- __________________________________ ,,.,,. / 0 ------- a\n3000- -------- -- - - - _/ ~ ----- E ----- :) z 2600- - - - - - - - - - - ---------- -------- ---------- - - --- 2200- ./ /. _/  / ./ 1900-------r--------r------r-------.----..------....-------,, 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 School Years 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 (/) ........ ...... 3400 3000 2600 t2200 4-- 0 ~ 1800 E :J z 1400 1000 Figure 3 TRENDS IN WHITE ENROLLMENT BY GRADE LEVELS - 1980-81 TO 1987-88 I / / 1 I ------- ./ I I ------- I / / I ------  I I/ ---- __\nI I -- -------- ____ _...- I ..._...__..._ - - ------------ I I/ ....... _____ -- -- /1 -....._ -- -- I .............. ..._..._ I ..... ._._ - - _/ I ._..._..._ I --- I - __::::._--:--:-_=:-.::.:-:::.:::.:===~,---------------- I I ------ I ______________________ / 600+-------.----------r-----r-------T------r-----r--------, 80-81 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 School Years 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 54 05   04  Figure 4 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes Total: 1-3 1979-80 to 1987 -88 Numelical Change  :t 50 @ +51-100 @ +101 or more  -51 to 100  -101 or more 54 17 @ Figure 5 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes Black: 10-12 1979-80 to 1987 -88 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D + 50 @ 51-100 @ + 101 or more  - 51 to 100  - l0lor more the city's center. (See Figures 4 and 5.) These correspond to geocodes 1, 2, 3, and 4. There were also drops in enrollment in the upper northwest section of the city--substantial for the primary years and less so for the high school grades. Total enrollments changed relatively little, on the other hand, in neighborhoods west of University Avenue (Geocodes 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, and 19) and in the areas east of University but north of West Markham (geocodes 7, 8, and 9) although here there were occasional spots of decline. There were no geocode groups where total enrollments increased by more than 50 pupils in the primary grades, and only two in which they increased this much in grades 10 to 12. One such area is south of !630 and east of University (geocode 05). The other is also south of 1630 but west of Barrow to !430\nits southern boundary is West 36th Street (geocode 17). Some of the geocode areas which remained stable did so because increases among black pupils offset white losses. (See Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9.) This was true of areas below !630 and west of University for both grade levels (geocodes 17, 18, and 19). There were also small losses among whites in some neighborhoods east of University, but blacks did not always gain sufficiently to offset these losses. Losses among black students, on the other hand, were substantial in some downtown neighborhoods for both the primary and high school grades. White enrollments in these areas, which were small to begin with, changed little between 1979 and 1987. As the maps indicate, there has been a clear movement of black pupils toward the western part of the city, but not to the higher-priced northwest. Whites have moved out of the areas where black enrollees have increased (or white graduates have not been replaced by younger whites). However, whites have contributed little to public school enrollments in the northwest despite substantial new construction. Since much of the recent construction has been of apartment units, new occupants may include relatively few school-age chil- -7- 54 17  04  Figure 6 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes Black: 1-3 1979-80 to 1987 -88 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D 25 @ +26-75 @ +76 or more  -26 to 75  -76 or more 54 17 @ 04 CD Figure 7 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes White: 1-3 1979-80 to 1987 -88 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D -t-25 @ +26-75 @ +76 or more  -26 to 75  -76 or more 54 17 @ 04  Figure 8 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes Black: 10-12 1979-80 to 1987 -88 N umeiical Change \u0026lt;D t-50 @ + 26-75 @ + 76 or more  - 26-75  - 76 or more 54 04 CD Figure 9 Enrollment Change Little Rock Geocodes White: 10-12 1979-80 to 1987 -88 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D 25 @ +26 to 75 @ +76 or more  -26 to 75  -76 or more dren. These areas also include some of the city's higher-income neighborhoods, where between 30 and 50 percent of school-aged children were reported to be attending private schools at the 1980 census. Private school attendance probably remains high in these areas. Locational Changes (Expanded Boundaries) As already indicated, we were able to obtain no reliable historical data on school enrollments which could be used to make a precise assessment of recent trends in the territory added to the Little Rock District in Fall 1987. Metroplan's 1986 population estimates indicate substantial new residential construction in much of the annexed territory, and considerable increase in population as well. In fact, it is in the new territory that much of the city's new residential construction and population gain has taken place, according to Metroplan. (See Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 10.) It is likely, therefore, that school enrollments have also increased, offsetting some of the decline in neighborhoods closer to the city's center. Much of the new construction has been in multi-family units, however, and this may have tended to hold enrollments down. At the time of the 1980 census, apartments in Little Rock yielded an average of 1.9 persons, compared with 2.41 persons for single family homes. Furthermore, about 40 percent of the city's total population growth occurred in one far northwest census tract (42.03) where about a third of all children of elementary and junior high age were in private schools in 1980. More than half the units built since 1980 in this tract, according to Metroplan officials, have been apartments. In adjoining tracts (22.01, 22.03, 22.04, 22.05 and 24.01) the ratio of apartments was even higher. In the tracts in the southwest part of the city (24.02, 41.03, 41.04, 41.05, 41.06, and 42.04) single family units have -8- 42.04 24.01 @ 24.02 @ 40.03 Figure 10 Change in Total Population Little Rock Census Tracts 1980-86 40.01 Percentage Change \u0026lt;D + 1% @ 2-5% @ + 6% or more  - 2-5%  - 6% or more TABLE 3 CHANGES IN TOTAL POPULATION BY CENSUS TRACT* LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 1980 TO 1986 Census Change 80-86 Tract 1980 1986 No. Pct. 1 860 1,090 230 26. 7% 2 4,491 4,430 (61) -1.4% 3 2,726 2,890 164 6.0% 4 1,508 1,490 (18) -1.2% 5 4,904 4,940 36 0.7% 6 3,956 3,880 (76) -1.9% 7 2,969 2,920 (49) -1.7% 8 773 760 (13) -1.7% 9 806 790 (16) -2.0% 10 4,391 4,340 (51) -1.2% 11 4,831 4,750 (81) -1. 7% 12 2,675 2,630 (45) -1.7% 13 5,262 5,170 (92) -1.7% 14 3,417 3,420 3 0.1% 15 8,175 9,270 1,095 13.4% 16 5,258 5,350 92 1.7% 17 867 850 (17) -2.0% 18 6,406 6,350 (56) -0.9% 19 5,029 5,280 251 5.0% 20.01 5,748 5,900 152 2.6% 20.02 5,568 5,480 (88) -1.6% 21.01 8,468 8,740 272 3.2% 21.02 4,095 4,050 (45) -1.1% 22.01 5,196 5,710 514 9.9% 22.03 4,935 5,510 575 11.7% 22.04 7,938 8,830 892 11.2% 22.05 6,940 9,570 2,630 37.9% 24.01 11,100 12,170 1,070 9.6% 24.02 7,378 7,530 152 2.1% 40.01 2,705 2,860 155 5.7% 41.03 3,813 3,800 (13) -0.3% 41.04 1,154 1,490 336 29.1% 41.05 6,211 6,480 269 4.3% 41.06 6,660 6,930 270 4.1% 41.07 4,058 3,990 (68) -1.7% 41.08 6,361 6,250 (111) -1.7% 42.03 7,512 13,970 6,458 86.0% 42.04 2,615 3,460 845 32.3% Total 177,759 193,320 15,561 8.8% *Some census tracts extend into unincorporated portions of Pulaski County. Only the population of these tracts living within the city of Little Rock are included in the numbers given for both 1980 and 1987. SOURCES: 1980 data from 1980 Census of Population, updated by Metroplan to include territory annexed by Little Rock aftei 1980. 1987 estimates from Metroplan, January 1988. predominated in new construction, but except for the extreme southwest, the number of new homes has been relatively modest. Table 4 Housing Permits Issued for New Housing Units, 1980-86 in Census Tracts with 100 or More New Homes Little Rock, Arkansas Census Tract 1 3 15 16 19 20.01 21.01 22.01 22.03 22.04 22.05 24.01 24.02 40.01 41.06 42.03 42.04 Mul ti-Familz: 152 130 727 60 204 154 243 271 372 464 1,386 439 2 122 64 2,073 110 Source: Metroplan, March 1987 Single-Familz: 0 2 31 45 6 6 18 80 29 133 227 259 135 5 137 1,462 324 Total 152 132 758 105 210 160 261 351 401 597 1,613 698 137 127 201 3,535 434 It is possible to obtain some indication of enrollment change in the annexed areas by comparing data on school-age children from the 1980 Census by census tract with data for the same tracts from 1987-88 school data. While school data are recorded for geocodes and not for census tracts, about 83 percent of all geocodes fall entirely within a single census tract. Among many of the remainder which cross tract lines, it is apparent from an examination of maps that the majority of residents live within one of the tracts. In these cases we assigned all of the children to that tract. While this procedure may result in some errors, they are probably small, and the results can be considered illustrative, if not definitive. -9- The census data are for 5-year age groups rather than by grades as are the school data. In the analysis, therefore, we used children aged 5 to 9 years in 1980 as a proxy for kindergarten to grade 4, making an adjustment to take out those attending private schools. We have data on the total population without regard to race for all census tracts. However, no 1980 racial data are available for those tracts in which the black population as a whole numbered fewer than 400 persons in that year. Several tracts within the annexed territory fell into this category, although 1987 school data now show sizeable black school populations. We also do not have separate data on private school attendance for blacks and nonblacks. The analysis of the 1980 and 1987-88 data can give us only a rough indication of changes in enrollment patterns and the direction of change in the territory recently added to the Little Rock School District. (The annexed territory includes all or part of census tracts 20.01, 20.02, 24.02, 40.01, 41.03, 41.04, 41.05, 41.06, 41.07, 41.08, 42.03, and 42.04.) Nevertheless, they do indicate a clear increase in enrollments in the lower grades in much of the annexed area since 1980, primarily south of I30 and east of Heinke Road (tracts 41.05, 41.06, and 41.08). The comparison shows little change west of Heinke (tracts 41.03 and 41.04) and in the far northwest part of the school district (tract 42.03), although Metroplan reports a considerable amount of new construction of both multi-family and single-family dwellings. In one tract (42.04) there was a sizeable decline in enrollment.* (See Figure 11.) Since most census tracts in the annexed territory had relatively small black populations in 1980, it is difficult to tell much about racial change within the new area. At least a few tracts, however, appeared to have drawn increases in both black and nonblack enrollments between 1980 and 1987-88. (See Figures 12 and 13.) -10- 42.04 24.01  24.02 @ 40.03 Figure 11 Enrollment Change, 1980-87 Little Rock Census Tracts Total: K-4 40.01 Numerical Change, 1980-87 \u0026lt;D + 50 @ 51-100 @ + 101 or more  - 51-100  - 101 or more 42.04 24.01 @ 24.02 @ 40.01 40.03 Figure 12 Enrollment Change, 1980-87 Little Rock Census Tracts Black: K-4 (tracts with 400 or more Blacks, 1980} Numerical Change, 1980-87 \u0026lt;D + 25  + 26-75 @ + 76 or more  - 26-75 @ - 76 or more 42.04 24.01  24.02  40.03 Figure 13 Enrollment Change, 1980-87 Little Rock Census Tracts White: K-4 (tracts with 400 or more Blacks, 1980) 40.01 Numerical Change, 1980-87  + 25 @ + 26-75 @ + 76 or more  - 26-75  - 76 or more Overall, it appears that there have been few if any radical and rapid shifts in the pupil population of the Little Rock School District over the past several years. Total enrollments have declined steadily from year to year (except for the recent increase due to the annexation), but the drop has been gradual. Black enrollments have grown somewhat while white enrollments have decreased, but the pace has been quite slow in both directions. In gen-eral, change in the schools appear to be moving in concert with changes in the city as a whole--population losses in close-in older neighborhoods, growth in certain outlying areas. While much of the city's total growth has gone into the northwest and southwest, however, some of these areas have gained rela-tively few public school pupils, at least in the lower grades.* Black population and black school children have tended to move out of the older areas to the east and in the center and toward the west and southwest. In some of these areas they are clearly replaced white pupils. In other areas white enrollments appear relatively stable. *Metroplan staff expressed surprise at the drop in the K-4 enrollment in this tract (42.04) where their figures show a 1980-86 total population increase of 1,452 persons and the addition of 432 dwellings, three-fourths of which were single-family units. We have no reasonable explanation for the discrepancy. -11-  III. FACTORS INFLUENCING FUTURE ENROLLMENTS Expectations for Growth There are several sources of population projections for Pulaski County, two of which were consulted for this study--those made by the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, which produces the official projections for all counties in the State of Arkansas, and those made by Metroplan. UALR's projections are for the total population of Pulaski County by race, sex, and five-year age groups. The projections are given for intervals of five years to the year 2000. There are no separate figures for subareas of the county. Metroplan projects the total population of Pulaski County, along with the three other counties (Saline, Faulkner, and Lonoke) that make up the Little Rock-North Little Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area, and also distributes the projection among census tracts in the urbanized areas. The census tract projections are only for the year 2010 with no figures for intervening years. UALR projects the population of Pulaski County to reach more than 441,000 persons by the year 2000, an increase of more than 100,500 or 29.6 percent over the 1980 population of 340,600. (This represents approximately one-fifth of the total increase projected for the entire State of Arkansas in the 20-year period.) About one-fourth of the increase is estimated to have occurred between 1980 and 1985, with about an equal increase expected every five years thereafter to the turn of the century. Metroplan has a somewhat higher projection, expecting the county to reach more than 474,000 persons by 2000 (an increase of 39.3 percent over 1980), and 530,000 by the year 2010, a gain of over 189,000 persons or 55.6 percent in just 30 years. -12- Only UALR projects the county's population for whites and blacks separately. Because of their higher rate of in-migration--during the 1970s the nonwhite rate was 19.6 percent compared to only 2.7 percent for whites-nonwhites are projected to number about 148,800 in the year 2000. They will then constitute one-third (33.7 percent) of the Pulaski County population, compared with 25.2 percent at the 1980 census. Our informant at UALR expects this in-migration to continue for the foreseeable future. Since Little Rock now has a substantial black community, he believes it will continue to be attractive to blacks now living elsewhere in Arkansas. Where the Growth Will Go Only a limited amount of the growth projected for Pulaski County in the next 20-30 years is likely to go inside the current boundaries of the city of Little Rock. Much of the central area has been losing population in recent years, and much of the rest of the city is already well developed. In 1980 the city contained almost half of the county's total population, and since then several tracts of land on the west and northwest sides of the city have begun to fill up. Described by one informant as \"the place to live in Little Rock\", the area of greatest growth in Pulaski County during the 1980s has been the northwest section of the city. To a lesser degree, the area to the south-west has also been attractive. This latter area was described by the same informant as popular for \"entry level\" housing for first-time homebuyers of more modest means. Almost everyone consulted for this study agrees that growth will continue on the city's western borders. There are still several large tracts of undeveloped land now prime for development. A number of major residential, commercial or institutional construction projects are in the planning stages or beyond. Census tract 42.03 in the northwest alone is projected by Metroplan -13- to increase its population by almost five times between 1980 and 2010. Tract 42.04 extending directly westward from the city will grow by almost three and a half times. Other tracts in the same general area will also grow, though more modestly. (See Table 5 and Figure 14.) Altogether, Metroplan has projected that the census tracts on the city's west side will gain almost 50,000 new residents by the year 2010. Only part of that growth will occur within the present boundaries of the Little Rock School District, however. While part of the growth area lies within the recently-annexed territory of the school system, most of the census tracts where growth is projected also extend well out beyond current city limits into the remainder of Pulaski County--and hence, beyond the present boundaries of the Little Rock School District. While the city of Little Rock may eventually annex some of the newly developed area, it is not axiomatic that the children living there will also be annexed by the Little Rock School District. At the same time, it is unlikely that a large segment of Little Rock's black community will participate in the westward movement to the city's borders and beyond. These areas contain some of the highest priced housing in the city, and blacks in Little Rock still have a considerably lower median incomes than do whites. Instead, the movement of blacks has tended to be on the near west side of the city and toward the southwest below 1630 where housing is more affordable. It is likely that this movement will continue unless steps are taken to re-direct it or to open up other options. Other Population Change in Little Rock As already noted, like almost all American cities, Little Rock has been losing population at its core. Between 1980 and 1986 Metroplan estimated that there were losses in almost every census tract on the eastern side of the -14- TABLE 5 CHANGES IN TOTAL POPULATION BY CENSUS TRACT* LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 1980 TO 2010 Census 1980 2010 Change 1980-2010 Tract Total Tract Total Tract No. Pct 1 860 1,600 740 86.0% 2 4,491 4,000 (491) -10. 9% 3 2,726 3,200 474 17.4% 4 1,508 1,000 (508) -33.7% 5 4,904 5,200 296 6.0% 6 3,956 4,000 44 1.1% 7 2,969 3,200 231 7.8% 8 773 800 27 3.5% 9 806 800 (6) -0. 7% 10 4,391 4,600 209 4.8% 11 4,831 4,600 (231) -4.8% 12 2,675 2,200 (475) -17.8% 13 5,262 4,800 (462) -8.8% 14 3,417 3,800 383 11.2% 15 8,175 10,000 1,825 22.3% 16 5,258 5,100 (158) -3.0% 17 867 850 (17) -2.0% 18 6,406 5,900 (506) -7.9% 19 5,029 4,500 (529) -10.5% 20.01 5,748 5,700 (48) -0.8% 20.02 5,568 5,600 32 0.6% 21.01 8,468 8,000 (468) -5.5% 21.02 4,095 6,000 1,905 46.5% 22.01 5,196 5,600 404 7.8% 22.03 4,935 5,300 365 7.4% 22.04 7,938 8,800 862 10.9% 22.05 6,940 9,500 2,560 36.9% 23 920 950 30 3.3% 24.01 11,100 16,800 5,700 51.4% 24.02 7,378 13,800 6,422 87.0% 40.01 5,539 4,500 (1,039) -18.8% 41.03 3,813 5,500 1,687 44.2% 41.04 1,354 6,800 5,446 402.2% 41.05 6,211 12,200 5,989 96.4% 41.06 6,660 8,400 1,740 26.1% 41.07 4,058 4,900 842 20.7% 41.08 6,361 7,200 839 13.2% 42.03 8,260 38,900 30,640 370.9% 42.04 6,614 22,000 15,386 232.6% 186,460 266,600 80,140 43.0% *Data for both 1980 and 2010 are for the entire census tract. In some cases, the tract boundaries currently extend beyond the city limits into unincor-porated portions of Pulaski County. SOURCES: 1980 data from 1980 Census of Population. 2010 projections from Metroplan, Planning Support Document, Pulaski Area Transportation Study, May 1987.  42.04 42.03  24.01 @ 24.02 @ 40.03 Figure 14 Projected Change in Total Population Little Rock 40.01 Census Tracts 1980-2010 Percentage Change  t 5% @ + 6-25% @ + 26% or more  - 6-25%  - 26% or more city, in the tracts close to downtown, and in those on the near west side but east of University Avenue. Several of these tracts are projected by Metroplan to continue their population decline through the year 2010 while others, including some close to the city's center, will gain slightly. Some of the 1980-86 gainers west of University or south of 20th Street are projected to turn into losers or to stabilize by 2010. Since \"declining\" neighborhoods are usually \"aging\" neighborhoods as well, these areas will probably lose school-age as well as total population. However, some losers in the southeast are projected by Metroplan to become gainers by the year 2010. One close-in prospect for population gain is the neighborhood just to the east of the old downtown where there has been recent rehabilitation of old Victorian homes by young middle-class couples and families (Census Tract 6), However, the size of the area available for such gentrification is severely restricted not only by the number of dwellings but also by physical barriers to its extension. To date, whatever physical changes have taken place in the area's housing has had little effect on the pupil population living within the area. Future Growth of the Child Population Children are usually the most difficult group in the population to project. Unlike adults whose births are already a matter of record and whose survival from one age group to another can usually be tracked based on past experience with mortality and migration, how many children there will be in the future is subject to many more uncertainties. How will the birthrate shift? Will there be a trend toward larger families? or having babies at earlier ages? or later ages? If migration patterns for an older group changes, how will this affect the migration of children? -15- The number of children born to Pulaski County residents (we have no separate data for Little Rock) has remained remarkably constant over the past 10 years. Except for a dip in 1978 (considered by several sources as an obvious error in the data), the number of births did not vary by more than a few hundred between 1977 and 1986. Births to both blacks and whites have also remained almost constant\nthe difference between the highest and lowest numbers in any one year has been little more than 300 for each race. (See Figure 15). Despite the constancy in births, the child population of Pulaski County, like the total population, is projected by UALR to gain by the year 2000. However, like child populations nationally and in most communities across the country, their growth rate will be substantially below that of the total population. According to UALR's projections, children below age 20 will increase by only 16.7 percent between 1980 and 2000, an increase of fewer than 19,000 in the 20-year period. Furthermore, the largest number will be ages 15 to 19, with smaller numbers at each descending 5-year age group. The smallest number will be children below five years of age. Thus, unless there is a substantial in-migration of young children it is likely that the seeds are present for even more slender growth of the county's child population in the future. Still, children will total almost 130,000 in Pulaski County in 2000. And they will be almost 30 percent of the county's total population. (See Table 6.) All of the gain in children and then some will be among black children who are projected to grow from under 37,200 in 1980 to almost 57,800 in 2000. They will be almost evenly distributed among the four age subgroups. White children, on the other hand, will decline slightly in number--from about 74,200 in 1980 to about 72,100 in 2000. There will be more than 2,000 more white children ages 15 to 19 than under five years. -16- 8000 7000 6000 CJ) -.5 5000 ..L... CD Figure 15 BIRTHS IN PULASKI COUNTY TOTAL AND BY RACE - 1977 TO 1986 't\n4000 -------- L a, ---- -------------- ----------------------- ........................... ,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,. ----- -- ............ ,,,,.,.,,,,,,. .0 5 3000 ...,_,.,. :z 2000 - - - - - - -------  1000 0-+---------r-----r----~-----r-------,-----r----r------r------, 1977 1978 1979 Total births 1980 1981 1982 Year of Births White births 1983 1984 1985 1986 Nonwhite births TABLE 6 PROJECTIONS OF THE CHILD POPULATION BY RACE - PULASKI COUNTY TOTAL CHILDREN 1980 1986 1990 1995 2000 CENSUS ESTIMATE PROJECTIONS Under 5 years 28,291 32,599 32,649 31,923 31,370 5 to 9 years 28,117 28,074 32,385 32,496 31,848 10 to 14 years 25,870 28,358 28,404 32,804 32,981 15-19 years 29,047 26,423 29,042 29,142 33,682 TOTAL 111,325 115,454 122,480 126,365 129,881 WHITE CHILDREN 1980 1986 1990 1995 2000 CENSUS ESTIMATE PROJECTIONS Under 5 years 17,903 20,201 19,504 18,132 16,966 5 to 9 years 18,350 17,267 19,488 18,818 17,496 10 to 14 years 17,662 17,975 16,915 19,092 18,437 15-19 years 20,252 17,766 18,084 17,016 19,212 TOTAL 74,167 73,209 73,991 73,058 72,111 NONWHITE CHILDREN 1980 1986 1990 1995 2000 CENSUS ESTIMATE PROJECTIONS Under 5 years 10,388 12,398 13,145 13,791 14,404 5 to 9 years 9,767 10,807 12,897 13,678 14,352 10 to 14 years 8,208 10,383 11,489 13,712 14,544 15-19 years 8,795 8,657 10,958 12,126 14,470 TOTAL 37,158 42,245 48,489 53,307 57,770 II SOURCE: Research and Public Service, University of Arkansas, Little Rock. If there has been no rise in the number of births among Pulaski County residents, then why is the number of children in the county expected to growF? According to our informant at UALR the explanation lies in the migration patterns to the Little Rock area which have recently shown an increase in the in-migration of blacks from elsewhere in Arkansas. Blacks who might formerly have gone to Chicago, Detroit or Memphis, he states, are now drawn to Little Rock because of the size of its black community. As long as there continues to be a sizeable black population remaining in rural or small-town Arkansas, he expects that the migration to Little Rock will continue. We have found no projections below the county level for children so it is difficult to say what proportion of them are likely to end up in the Little Rock School District. Some are probably members of young families whose best prospects for starter housing may lie outside the city limits. Still, while less than half of Pulaski County's total population lived in Little Rock in 1980, almost 63 percent of its black population resided there. If this ratio- or close to it--continues into the future, a substantial proportion of the county's additional child population could go to Little Rock schools. We note that the UALR projection calls for an increase of somewhat over 1,000 black children per year in Pulaski County between 1980 and 2000, Over 600 of this increase, by the figure just cited, will occur in Little Rock. Enrollment figures so far in the 1980s, however, have shown a fairly consistent increase in black pupils averaging only about 127 per year. We have no explanation for this difference. However, we note that our projections, which will be discussed in the next chapter, indicate not a gain but a gradual decrease in overall black enrollments in future years. Because of the possibility that enrollment trends may be in the process of shifting, we recommend that they be monitored closely for the next several years and that revised projections be developed if necessary. -17- Influence of the Little Rock Economy A major shift--either up, down or dramatically different--in Little Rock's economic picture could affect migration patterns, and hence its school enrollments. This is unlikely to occur. One informant, a businessman with several decades of experience in living and working in Little Rock, described its economy as extremely stable--\"Good times, bad times, we grow about 2 percent a year. This isn't going to change\". Centers of government are often fairly recession-resistent, and Little Rock is probably no exception. When times are good, most people share in the prosperity. If times turn bad, government often steps in with new programs or expands old ones. In addition to being the State Capital, Little Rock is also a trading and distribution center for the upper south central region. It is also a major education and hospital center. It has a campus of the University of Arkansas as well as several regional medical centers. Its economy, in addition to growing steadily, has been moving in concert with the national economy. Manufacturing employment is down but not out, white collar and service industries are up. In 1985 the largest number of jobs (53,700) in the four-county Little Rock-North Little Rock metropolitan area were in wholesale and retail trade, according to the Arkansas Employment Security Division. The second largest number were service jobs (47,200). A substantial majority of these were in professional and related services, such as hospitals, other health services, and education. Service jobs had grown by 28 percent in the five years since 1980. In third place were government jobs (44,400). While manufacturing was in fourth place (33,800), the number of manufacturing jobs had declined by 10 percent since 1980. The drop, however, was more than overset by gains in other sectors so that the overall number of jobs was greater in 1985 than in 1980, by more than 9 percent. -18- IV. THE ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Record of Prior Projections According to informants in the school system, its earlier enrollment projections have come remarkably close to the mark. In one recent year, for example, the actual enrollment was off by just a single pupil. Projections made in 1981 in an earlier study by Stanton Leggett and Associates also came close. When based on earlier enrollment trends, the Leggett figures fell just 136 pupils short of actual enrollment in fall 1985, or 0.7 percent. When based on the geographic distribution of the student population, the shortfall was only 79, or 0.4 percent. Most pupil enrollment projections are made by some variation of the \"cohort survival\" method. Basically, the method begins with data on the current school population by grade. It then \"ages\" that population, moving it up one grade for each succeeding year. At the same time, it \"survives\" the population, employing ratios developed out of school system experience which indicate what proportion of the children in one grade can usually be expected to show up in the next. The \"survival ratio'' is often a decimal fraction smaller than one\nhowever, it can be greater than one if youngsters migrating into the area from outside are added to the population in later grades. For children who are not yet old enough to be in school, the number of births in the appropriate year is used to develop the ratio. When the projection goes beyond the children already born, assumptions are made about the future fertility rate of the population. The comparative accuracy of past projections in the Little Rock School District is a tribute not just to the skill of the projectors, but also to the steadiness of past enrollment trends. In the present situation, however, one -19- II II II II II   II     II factor makes the projections particularly risky. This is the 1987 addition of a large number of pupils from the Pulaski Special School District, about whose \"survival\" almost nothing is known. Thus, we cannot develop survival ratios for almost a third of the current Little Rock pupil population based on their own trends and behavior. Projections for System-wide Planning Several sets of projections were developed and evaluated. All but one involved some variation of the \"cohort survival\" method, although they were also compared with independent data sources such as those furnished by Metroplan and UALR to determine if they were consistent both with current demographic and economic trends and future projections. Table 7 presents the final projections for each grade level which we recommend for current planning. We suggest strongly, however, that these be reviewed and updated annually as more data become available on the pupil population in the annexed territory. For the projections of black enrollment we used a three-year average of survival ratios for the old district. Past data were first projected to 1986 for the old district and compared to the actual 1986 enrollment. When the two compared quite closely, the three-year ratio was applied to the actual enrollments in the expanded district in fall 1987 and projections made to future years. White enrollments received somewhat different treatment. They had declined during the first years of the 1980s, but then began to turn up again. Some grade levels among whites began the reversal earlier than others, and the junior high years from 7th to 9th grade never did change directions. Since we could not determine whether the reversal was merely a temporary blip or presaged a change in trends, we used only one year's survival ratios--that of -20- TABLE 7 CURRENT AND PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS BY GRADE LEVEL AND RACE 1987-88 TO 1997-1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Current Projected 1987-88 1990-91 1995-96 1997-98 Total Enrollment Kindergarten Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6 Grades 7-9 Grades 10-12 Total Black Enrollment Kindergarten Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6 Grades 7-9 Grades 10-12 Total Nonblack Enrollment Kindergarten Grades 1-3 Grades 4-6 Grades 7-9 Grades 10-12 Total 1,846 6,449 5,820 6,064 6,401 26,580 1,184 4,196 3,819 3,695 3,207 16,101 662 2,253 2,001 2,369 3,194 10,479 1,834 6,059 5,494 5,966 5,952 25,305 1,156 3,797 3,593 3,712 3,219 15,477 678 2,264 1,900 2,253 2,732 9,827 1,797 6,072 5,180 5,297 5,605 23,951 1,135 3,810 3,250 3,167 3,128 14,490 662 2,262 1,930 2,131 2,477 9,462 1,797 6,072 5,158 5,269 5,389 23,685 1,135 3,810 3,250 3,115 2,913 14,223 662 2,262 1,908 2,154 2,477 9,463 *Ratios have been calculated on basis of enrollments within the boundaries which existed prior to the 1987-88 school year, but projections are based on enrollments in the expanded district in that year. 1986--for the white projections. These trends especially will require careful monitoring to determine their staying power. Total enrollments were arrived at by combining the black and white projections. In addition, as already noted, all of the projections assume that pupils in the annexed territory will behave in exactly the same way as those in the old territory. This is a risky assumption at best that should also be evaluated as reliable data on the new territory becomes available. Since data on births are available only for children who will be entering kindergarten through 1992, for later years we assumed that there would be the same number of both black and white births in the years thereafter as in 1986. As already noted, except for a temporary decline in 1978 (which many people attribute to an error in the figures and for'which an adjustment was made), the number of births has remained remarkably stable for the past ten years in Pulaski County. Overall, the projections indicate that total enrollment will continue to decline moderately through the 1997-98 school year. The drop will be largest at the junior and senior high school level. Both black and white enrollments will decline. Black junior and senior high school students will grow slightly by 1990, then drop off, while the number in grades 1 to 3 will be somewhat larger in 1995 and 1997 than in 1990. The number of white pupils at every grade level above 3rd grade will decline from its current level. Kindergarten and grades 1-3, on the other hand, will experience almost no change. Small-Area Projections Projections have also been made of the K-4 enrollments for individual census tracts throughout the expanded school district. They are shown in Figures 16 through 18. -21- 42.04 24.01  24.02 \u0026lt;D 41.06 @ 40.03 Figure 16 Enrollment Projections Little Rock Census Tracts Total: K-4 40.01 1987-88 lo 1990-91 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D + 50 @ 51-100 @ + 101 or more  - 51-100 @ - 101 or more 42.04 24.01  24.02 @ 41.06 @ 40.03 40.01 Figure 17 Enrollment Projections Little Rock Census Tracts Total: K-4 1987-88 to 1995-96 Numerical Change \u0026lt;D + 50 @ + 51-100 @ + 101 or more  - 51-100  - 101 or more 42.04 24.01 @ 24.02 @ 40.01 40.03 Figure 18 Enrollment Projections Little Rock Census Tracts Total: K-4 1987-88 to 1997-98 2 @ Numerical Change \u0026lt;D + 50 @ 51-100 @ + 101 or more  - 51-100 @ - 101 or more Section 2 Report: Meeting the Physical Facilities Needs of Seven Racially Identifiable Schools Stant.on Leggett and Associates  Educational Consultants West Tisbury, Mass. 02575 REPORT\nMEETING THE PHYSICAL FACILITIES NEEDS OF SEVEN RACIALLY IDENTIFIABLE SCHOOLS Little Rock School District, Little Rock, Arkansas June 1988 RACIALLY IDENTIFIABLE SCHOOLS A school with 76% or more Black enrollment is designated as racially identifiable. These schools will have major enhancements to their programs Including the following:  Tutortng programs  Reduced teacher /pupil ratio- a ratio ofl8 children to one teacher will be used.  Extended day care will be provided with costs based on a sliding scale.  Home Instruction will be supported for preschoolers  Individual school programs will be implemented with areas of emphasis.  Renovations of buildings are proposed to put these buildings In top physical condition. RENOVATIONS OF BUILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SETTINGS FOR LEARNING In order to create in the seven racially identifiable schools the appropriate environment for learning, a series of major enhancements to these buildings have been proposed. These enhancements are detailed In the Appendix and are summarized in Table 1. To the seven racially identifiable schools has been added the Franklin School. This building is in the general area of the seven schools and can be involved In the effort to provide improved facilities for the seven schools. Table 1 shows estimated costs of enhancements. Those at Franklin are considered minor enhancements. Table 2. following, shows enrollments in the fall of the 1987-88 school year at the various schools. A map follows showing the relative locations of the schools and the major arteries. -2- Table 1 Racially Identifiable Schools and One Borderline School, with Estimated Costs of Physical Enhancement School Cost Franklin 22,350 Garland 396,890 lsh 124 ,770 King 1,1 97 ,815 Mitchell 106,470 Rockefeller 53 ,350 Stephens 964 ,720 Washington 742,730 3 ,609 ,095 Table 2 Enrollment by Grade for Selected Schools, 1987-88 Spec School K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ed Franklin 55 56 62 66 51 64 49 Garland 34 48 46 47 41 45 45 23 lsh 18 39 33 23 32 31 30 8 King 32 44 53 32 32 41 35 Mitchell 32 43 47 29 37 39 21 8 Rockefeller 50 48 42 32 33 42 42 Stephens 14 49 36 24 30 32 33 Washington 31 42 24 24 37 26 30 Total 403 329 214 269 256 289 218 214 2192 FRA~Kl I ,J 0 .STEP48\\JS 0 0 l'Si+ fv'\\t\\f S-4--\\ov.J/1-lG Rid.A:TIVE L~110NS OF ~L Bui LD/J--JGS 1r-J fd:F-ORr o,-.i RAUA LLY t,N\n,\u0026gt;Jn l=\"IABLE. ~oLS u',a I -4- Calculation of Capacity: Racially Identifiable Schools The capacity of a school is a Yariable depending upon policy decisions as to class slze and the provision of speciallzed staff that serve the student body as children are drawn out of the regular classes for this purpose. The provision of special education self-contained classes and resource rooms also affects capacity as these are withdrawn from the regular classroom supply. In this analysis kindergartens have been treated as classrooms since the program is a full-day operation. In the analysis of major enhancements of schools that are racially identifiable, the matter of providing adequate working conditions for the specialized staff assigned to the school becomes important. One measure of the school system's concerns in this area is given by the specialized (other than kindergarten and classroom) facilities provided for new schools. Table 3, following, shows the spaces provided in the three most recently constructed schools of the school system. Analysis of these data suggests that in terms of staff and programs added to the schools, the following number of rooms should be set aside for the uses indicated. These rooms do not contribute to capacity of a school as students use these in addition to the regular classroom to which they are assigned, except for self-contained special education rooms. There should be at least one self-contained special education room in each school. This number is the average required by the system, including those in its five-year plan for special education. The rooms may be assigned differently from year to year, depending upon incidence of handicapped students among those assigned and the desire to provide primary and intermediate levels in program. The special education program provides a resource room in each school as well. Children attend programs for help in such a room, leaving the regular classroom for this purpose. In addition there are needs for reading and math laboratories for the ALP program, a computer laboratory and a music space which can be either a specially designed room that will control the sound or the use of the stage, suitably separated from the dining area. In consequence. for each school, six rooms must be deducted from the classroom inventory. Further. some of the major enhancements offered in the schools require rooms outside the capacity of the school. For example, the introduction of a Write-to-Read program requires a computer laboratory outfitted with IBM computer in order to function. Such a room uses a classroom that cannot be counted as capacity. PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS FOR RACIALLY IDENTIFIABLE SCHOOLS THAT WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SPECIAL ROOMS Garland: Mass media specialty does not require special space. X ISH: A science laboratory is required to support environmental education program. X King: A program for four-year olds will require space. A greenhouse laboratory is called for. Full-time art, music and foreign language, as well as environmental education specialists, will require science. foreign language and art spaces. With so many specialists the likelihood is that a departmentalized program will be used to schedule students to special classes. It has been assumed that the addition of a science laboratory and a room for four-year-olds will be required. Mitchell: Artists in residence for drama, writing, speech, and mime will be utilized. One space should be provided. - - -6- Capacity is calculated by deducting from the number of classrooms that are available in a building the number of rooms that will be required to be used for special purposes, including special education. ALP programs, music, and special offerings related to the program of enhancement. The number of regular classrooms is multiplied by eighteen, the maximum class size in racially identifiable schools. Kindergarten is treated like a regular grade since the program is a full-day program. Since a common standard of provision of special rooms has been used for the seven racially identifiable schools equal to the best that the school system has used in its most recent schools. and since additional special rooms are allocated based upon the program enhancement of the schools, the capacities of the schools are substantially lowered. The capacity of each of the schools is shown in the following table. Desirable School Size The schools under consideration are generally small schools built at a time when only classrooms were provided in the building. When the specialized rooms required for today's educational program are deducted, the schools become very small. The capacities of the schools under consideration are grouped by size below. Less than 200 Student Capacity: King 136 student capacity Washington 172 student capacity Stephens 190 student capacity 200-300 Student Capacity Mitchell 208 student capacity Garland 226 student capacity Ish 226 student capacity 300 Student Capacity and Up Franklin 352 student capacity Rockefeller 370 student capacity It is important to note that the capacities of the eight schools under consideration total 1880 students. when an adequate number of rooms for specialized use are deducted from the total available number of classrooms. This compares to the enrollment in the fall of 1987-88 of 2192 students. Any enhancement program based upon fixing up the existing buildings will not have dealt with the matter of providing adequately the services to be offered children in the schools, including the program enhancements required by the programs. To continue the buildings without change in spaces provided will cause these buildings either to be sharply overcrowded or to fall behind the system in providing services commonly provided across all schools, as well as program enhancements to make these schools educationally attractive. Size and School Organization In looking at school size, it is important to see the numbers with respect to the classroom organization that students pass through. The schools are organized as kindergarten to six grade units. That is, in order to have one section to a grade it is necessary to have about seven times 18 students, or 126 students, as total enrollment. To have two sections to a grade requires about 14 times 18 students per class. or 252 students. While children do not come in neat packages of 18 to a grade, it takes a somewhat larger school to accommodate such changes and still maintain the grade org~nlzation. TABLE 4 Calculation of Capacity: Seven Raclally ldentlflable Schools and Franklin Elementary School Capacity No. of Assign CR's Required- Rooms Not Capacity One Self- School CR's* 6 CR's Spec. Use by Total Assigned Remaining Contained to Spec. Enhancement Special to Spec. CR's x 18 Spec. Ed. Use Function Use Use @ 10 Students CR's (1)-(4) [Incl In (2)) ( 1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Franklin 25 6 6 19 342 10 Garland 18 6 6 12 216 10 lsh 19 6 7 12 216 10 King 15 6 2 8 7 126 10 Mitchell 16 4 5 11 198 10 Rockefeller 20 Q-** 0 0 20 360 10 Stephens 17 6 7 10 180 10 Washington 16 6 7 9 162 10 1800 includes kindergarten rooms.  Building has additional rooms suitable for ALP program. Therefore four set aside for special programs. Building has many specialized rooms in addition to classrooms and kindergarten space available to meet needs for special use rooms. Fall Total 1987-88 Capacity Enrollment (8) -'. .j ' 352 403 226 329 226 214 136 269 208 256 370 289 190 218 172 214 1880 2192 -8- When a school has a capacity well under 252 students and with more than 126 students representing one class to a grade. it is necessary for the school to organ.lze classes so that more than one grade is in a classroom. Most parents find this approach to be less desirable. It is possible to organize differently than by the chronological grade, using what is called an ungraded organization. In such a situation the children are dMded among the classrooms by some measure of maturity, or skill at reading, or some combination of devices. It can probably be said that with all the problems that the school system Is faced with, forcing a reorganization to some different kind of grade organization by maintaining small schools is unwise. It will no doubt be resisted by parents. concerned about their children, who do not see the need for such a change. Currently the schools avoid the issue by not having the special rooms that In this study are assigned to the schools in order to keep them at the level of provision of school facilities now found in the best school facilities of the system. A desirable size school that relates to the school organization ranges from 500 to 600 students with the equivalent of four sets of kindergarten to six units. or 28 rooms with 18 students each, for a total of at least 504 students. While children do not come to school In neat enrollment packages. In a moderate size school It is possible to accommodate. for the most part, dilTerences In enrollment from grade to grade without resorting to the placement of two grades in one classroom. Size and Staffing One should weigh the prudence of spending large sums of money to conserve buildings with limited enrollment and less adequate facilities as against providing larger schools with superior facilities that can be staffed so that there is room to work and the extensive specialized staff will be fully utilized. Any consideration of proposals for improvements in the seven racially identifiable schools must necessarily involve specific choices among a number of possible alternatives. For example. a decision must be reached on the question of school size. Should Little Rock continue to maintain and operate very small school units. however outdated and costly to efficiently maintain and operate they may be. because such little school units can also provide pupils a higher degree of personal attention with smaller class sizes and pupil/teacher ratios? Moreover, do not such smaller older schools often provide a sense of neighborhood identity and intergenerational stability which can give Individuals a sense of \"roots\" and belonging and continuity in a constantly changing larger community? By contrast. is it not also true that because of these very same smaller enrollments. such smaller schools often cannot provide many full-time services of such specialists as nurses, art and music teachers. counselors, and physical education Instructors, and cannot provide separate full-time specialized rooms for art, science, music, remedial reading, computer instruction. and similar costly services and facilities? How should a community choose between these competing alternatives? For example. in many small schools an art teacher may be assigned for only nine weeks per year. and for the rest of the year pupils are without this teacher's instructional services. While at the school such a teacher may do his/her work. based upon a stage, in a teachers' lounge or workroom, or may even carry needed supplies and work tools In the trunk of his/her car. These teachers may work with pupils, not In an art room but In a comer of the lunch room, or In an area of a regular classroom. and In some cases even in a stage or storage area or In a recessed part of a hallway. Moreover, if there is a reasonably useful space available, such teachers will -9- have to compete with the needs of other part-time specialists who also will be seeking space as a base of operations. We note with approbation that the established enhancement plan for stalTing proceeds for the assignment of many such specialists on a full-time basis and the consultants have therefore included necessary facilities for such specialists In their calculation of building capacities and recommended new facilities. Frequently there are also contrasting advantages which come with having larger units. With a large enough pupil base. three or four teachers can combine their skills at any given grade level, and pupils benefit. Thus one teacher may delight In teaching reading while another may have special skills and enthusiasm for teaching arithmetic. One may have a rich background in one area and another have hobby interests and competencies of a different kind. The larger school. with its larger staff. can offer many such benefits. Thus, too, because of the larger number of pupils, the cost per pupil for specialized full-time instructors In subjects such as art, music, crafts, health. computer science, and other diversified curricular offerings, become economically feasible. In addition, the costs of administration and overhead services can be reduced. One set of overhead costs in a larger building can be far less than the combined costs for similar services In two or three smaller units. Hence the decision as to what constitutes a desirable optimum size of a school involves an analysis of many factors. The consultants believe that an optimum size elementary school unit would be one having about four sections per grade level and preferably 500-600 pupils. Such a selection could provide an efficient base for personalized and specialized instructional services and at the same time provide an economical overhead and administrative cost basis also. Based upon the foregoing considerations, we believe that the enhanced instructional programs established by the policies of the Little Rock Board of Education, in conformity with the overall Court directives and decisions which have been previously established, can be well served by the recommendations herein presented. The Condition of the Building as a Criterion for Enhancement Some buildings are of a basic condition or have reached a point of wear where the enhancement of the building will not cover up the major problems that exist in the structure or the mechanical systems of the building. When schools were built as economically as possible, such buildings do not last forever, even with major repairs. The condition of the core of the building should be weighed in assigning children to these schools over long periods of time. An example is the Garland School. This building has masonry bearing walls and a wood frame inside. It is a multistoried building. A building of this type would not meet today's building codes and could not be built now. It is unwise to spend money on a building where the core is not that which should be in use today. In the case of Washington School, for example, the mechanical systems are worn out. The windows are rusting and should be replaced. The system of ventilating the rooms through the corridors by use of corridor fans represents the possibility of spreading flames in the event of fire. Washington School is not of sufficient quality to warrant substantial expenditures to patch it up. The proposed building program dealing with the seven racially identifiable schools attempts to apply current standards of quality to the buildings rather than accepting the existence of some buildings that. were the school district able to do so, would have been retired long ago. It is not wise to enhance a basically unsatisfactory structure. II II II II II II II -10- RECOMMENDATIONS The cost of remodeiing and rehabilitation of the schools. either as major or minor enhancements. has been estimated at $3.600,000. Such enhancement did not provide the level of specialized rooms that have been provided by the school system in its recent construction and that is necessary to house the staff properly that has been assigned to these schools. A series of alternative proposals have been suggested to combine four of the schools into two buildings each of about 600 student capacity. These are to add to Franklin Elementary School to bring its capacity to 600 students. requiring fourteen classrooms. The other move would be to combine Stephens and Garland Schools in one new building at the Stephens site. with a capacity of about 600 students. Add to Franklin Elementary School to Accommodate King Elementary School The estimated cost of adding to Franklin to bring the capacity to 600 students is based on the cost of 14 additional classrooms. These rooms, at 780 square feet each, the size of rooms under construction at the new Carver Magnet School. would require about 10,900 net square feet of space. Adding the necessary circulation. toilets, mechanical space to the net area would result in about 16.000 square feet of gross area. At $50 per square foot for all costs, using the basis for Carver Magnet School, the addition would cost $800,000. To this should be added the costs for upgrading Franklin School. first through the minor enhancements called for in the amount of $22.350 and, secondly, the probable need for further improvements necessary to upgrade Franklin School. These costs can be determined more accurately when architectural studies are started on the project. The amount of $100,000 has been tentatively allocated for the project. The total cost ls estimated to be $922,350. Major enhancement of King Elementary School was estimated to cost $1,187,815. With a capacity of 136 students. unchanged by the enhancement, the cost would be $8,700 per student. The new Carver Magnet School will have a cost for new construction. equipment. grounds. fees. and the like, of about $4,000 per student. Replace Stephens and Garland Schools With a New School The new Carver School has a capacity, depending upon the use of rooms and using the same measures of capacity as the other schools in this analysis, of about 568 students. Adding two classrooms by using the stage as a music room and reducing the storage for specialized spaces would result in a capacity of approximately 600 students. Using the cost of the Carver School as a measure. the new school would cost about $2,500,000. The combined budgets for enhancement of Garland of $396.890 and for Stephens of $964,720 is $1,361,600. This does not take into account that the Garland School is constructed with brick bearing walls and wood frame. It is suggested that a new school of 600 capacity be-constructed to replace Garland and Stephens Schools. The two schools are located only about seven blocks apart in an area with small block size. By using the Stephens site expanded. as the site of the new school. the new school could be expedited. There is much vacant land and many abandoned houses that could be secured to expand the site. -11- Add to Ish Elementary School and Distribute the Students Now Attending Washington Elementary School Between Rockefeller and Ish Schools Washington Elementary School ls a building that requires substantial rehabilitation. When completed, the result will not be a building that will be as effective as either Rockefeller School, which represents the best of the elementary schools in the area, or Ish. which is a more recently constructed building, fully air conditioned and with the capability of becoming one of the finer school buildings of the system. Both Ish and Washington have 214 student enrollments as of the fall of 1987-88. The service area of Washington School lies in part across Roosevelt Road from the school. It is proposed that students living north of Roosevelt Road attend Rockefeller School. If the capacity at Rockefeller of 370 students will not accommodate its present load of 289 students plus the students from Washington living north of Roosevelt Road, new classroom construction suggested here for Ish could be transferred to Roosevelt. until an appropriate balance has been reached. Assuming that the 80 student excess capacity at Rockefeller Is used, there would be a total of 134 students now assigned to Washington who could be assigned to Ish Elementary School. The Ish School has a total of twenty classrooms. and an enrollment of 214 students. The total enrollment. including Ish and part of Washington. would be 344 students. From the number of classrooms should be deducted six specialized rooms assigned in all schools and two additional specialized rooms related to the specialty of the school. Ish as an environmental education focus needs a science room and Washington would require a Write-to-Read laboratory. A total of eight specialized rooms would be needed. With twenty classrooms. reducing the count by the specialized rooms would result in twelve rooms. A series of changes are proposed. One is to move the cafeteria from the center of the Ish building and replace this outside the walls so that the noise is moved from the building. The space should be converted to a library and its supporting services. The present kitchen can be converted to a science room, the present library can be a computer laboratory. The new construction of an all-purpose room can include a stage that can be designed for music use. Thus three of the eight special rooms required can be provided. The additional five specialized rooms are deducted from the twenty classrooms available. The fifteen rooms available as regular kindergartens and classrooms at eighteen students a room would have a capacity of 270 students. With an anticipated student load of 344 students and an existing capacity of 270 students. there is a need for four classrooms. bringing the capacity to 342 students plus ten in a special education self-contained classroom, for a total of 352 students. The new rooms could be constructed at either Rockefeller or Ish, as was noted above. They are calculated under Ish capacity at this time. New construction would involve a new all-purpose room and kitchen described as 1,000 square feet of space for kitchen and auxiliary space, 1,600 square feet for the main floor, and 1,000 square feet for a stage usable for music along with storage. Four classrooms at 780 square feet, the size in the Carver Magnet School, would require a net area of 3120 square feet. The total net area required would be 6,720 square feet or an estimated 10,000 square feet of gross area. At $50 per square foot for all costs, the estimated cost is $500,000. To the cost of new construction should be added $125,000 for enhancements to the original structure and for repair to damage at the mechanical room and the nearby exterior wall. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $625,000. The estimated cost of enhancement of Washington Elementary School is $742,730 and oflsh is $204,311 for a total of $951,041. X X X -12- Mitchell Elementary School The needs of the school, as suggested in the original program for major enhancement in the amount of $106.470. should be expended as planned. The needs for the combination of Mitchell Elementary School and Rlghtsell should be approached in the light of overall needs of this area of the city. These needs should be analyzed In connection with other schools in the area. IMPACT ON CAPACITY OF PROPOSED CHANGES The resulting capacities of the seven racially identifiable schools and Franklin are as follows . King-Franklin Garland-Stephens !sh-Washington Rockefeller-Washington Mitchell Total 600 students 600 students 342 students 370 students ~students 2120 students The fall of 1987-88 enrollment in the schools was 2192. The Mitchell School should be modified and recommendation wlll be made for this school in relation to other schools in the area. This wlll provide opportunity to change capacity further. Mitchell shows an enrollment of 256 students and a capacity of 208 students. Much of the apparent deficit ls caused by the difference at Mitchell. Summary: New Construction and Enhancements of Schools as Planned or for the Period of Time Necessary to Complete Major Changes Washington Elementary School Provide enhancements for period of time necessary to make permanent changes Rockefeller Elementary School Make planned enhancements Mitchell Elementary School Make planned major enhancements. Garland Elementary School Make enhancements to building for use until new GarlandStephens ls completed Stephens Elementary School Demolition and site work New Stephens-Garland School King School Make enhancement to the school anticipating combining the school with Franklin $75,400 $53,350 $106.470 $86,300 $50,000 $2,500,000 $80,000 X -13- Franklin Elementary School Improvements to Franklin including minor enhancements New construction. fourteen-classroom addition !sh Elementary School Make planned enhancements and correction of fault in mechanical room and exterior wall New construction of cafeteria and four classrooms with stage also usable as music room Total cost rounded to $122,350 $800,000 $125,000 $500,000 $4,498,870 $4,500,000 The diITerence between the approximately $4,500,000 for this program and the $3,600,000 budgeted probably can be resolved with closer cost estimating and with savings in operational costs that would be involved. The major improvement brought forth by the alternative suggestion would be that the new schools resulting from additions would be related to good basic buildings and that the new school proposed could be controlled in quality of educational environment. The original proposal involved encapsulation of building cores that do not represent high quality in the enhanced schools and in so doing accepting a lesser standard for the educational environment for children in these schools for years to come. The significant factor in the dUTerence in cost between the original estimates of cost of about $3,600.000 is caused by the difference in capacity between the original proposal and the alternative suggested here. There is a difference of 240 student capacity between the 1880 capacity of the original proposal and the 2120 capacity of the alternative. Using the $4,000 per pupil approximate cost of the new Carver as a gauge. the 240 student capacity involved would cost about $960,000. or close to $1,000.000, eliminating the financial advantage of the original proposal. r- CL::Ni /\u0026lt;AL fllG\"'f\u0026lt;..:YJ-\\TL 0 te/c.11 rSGLL AJ.. Tt:RJ.lAnVG ./4pp,2,DN-J-lb.5 TO tM PQO VI '-J \u0026lt;\n, Bf(Si~AL FAC! I LfT76 MAf S-1--\\o~Jnk\nRf:lAT/\\)E LoC.AnONS or= ~L BUI LD/NGS IN f.2GFbR, ON Rl.L(A LLY /Df\nNn l=\"IABLE. ~oLS ,.'.. . .p. ' Conformity with Previously Established Major Enhancements Proposals and Time Schedules -15- It should be noted that these proposals are sufficient to house all present and contemplated 1989- 90 enrollments. and do not require a declining enrollment to be feasible. Whether the Central City school-age population actually remains stable, declines, or increases, it remains true that in the final analysis the number of children attending these schools will be determined by assignment and will not be determined by local residential status. However, the consultants believe that the recommended school size range from 500 to 600 pupils is desirable for both educational and economic reasons and has therefore been the basis of these proposals. If there be completely adverse reaction to the concept of not conforming completely with he original Court-accepted plans and time schedule. the consultants suggest that every effort be made to conform with the major elements of such plans as previously approved, and that consideration be given to securing approval of certain modifications by consideration of the following . 1. We believe that the work could and should proceed immediately as previously planned at Rockefeller, Mitchell, and Ish. All such enhancements will be of continuing use and value to the pupils and staff therein. 2. We believe that such work previously planned at Garland, which will be of primary benefit and usefulness to the pupils in their final year of occupancy of this school, should go forward as planned. Work which is long-term preventative and primarily structural and mechanical in nature should be deferred and re-evaluated. It is recommended that this building become the much needed improved housing for the Instructional Resource Center, which is now located In former Lee Elementary School. The Garland School cafeteria facility should continue to function as a community center until such time as the newly constructed school achieves recognition of its own community center status. It is, of course, true that plumbing, site, heating, cooling, ventilation, and electrical requirements for thirty to forty adult occupants are far less than those needed for hundreds of pupils. We earnestly suggest that public funds invested in the recommended new school would be of substantially greater benefit to pupils and taxpayers than would be the case if pumped into an eighty-year-old building. Moreover, by utilizing Garland for the Instructional Resource Center and disposing of Lee (which requires much work). the resource staff and program can function more effectively. Garland's facilities can be retained as a community center for as long as required, and substantial repair costs can be saved at both Garland and Lee. 3. We recommend that proposed work previously planned at King, and Intended primarily for pupil safety. comfort, and instructional effectiveness, be started immediately. The same considerations suggested for Garland should apply to King for the final year of pupil occupancy at this building. All savings from work that can be deferred and transferred to the King-Franklin addition should be sertously considered. A possible future use of the present King facility as an administrative unit for housing assistant superintendents and their staff could be considered, and such use would not require the major mechanical. site or structural renovations previously planned for effective occupancy by hundreds of pupils. Because the future use of King involves substantial consideration of possible future administrative reorganization policies and patterns. we believe that it would be judicious to keep current investment in this plant at a minimum consistent with short-term -16- utilization by present pupils. until final decisions are made to determine the final use of this facility . 4. To provide an effective new school to replace Garland and Stephens, the simplest procedure would be temporarily to spread Stephens' projected fall enrollment into not more than three or four nearby schools, which have the excess capacity to enroll them, and which can and will offer adequate facilities for their education. The present Stephens structure could then be demolished. and the site graded and prepared and a totally new school erected as recommended. There is much available vacant, boarded-up and low-cost property adjacent to the existing Stephens site. However, site acquisition takes substantial blocks of time, as well as funds. Other alternatives might include retaining some of the existing Stephens plant and building a part of the new school adjacent thereto, and then proceeding with final demolition and completion of the entire new plant. Still another choice could involve retaining some portions of the existing facility and building an addition thereto. In the consultants' view. this latter course could be as costly and more time consuming in the long run than the erection of an entirely new school. 5. In the case of Washington, it is recommended that the same consideration be given as previously recommended for Garland and King. Work should proceed immediately for items necessary for pupil safety and effective educational utilization for the coming school year. Those other Items beneficial to long-term plant and site use should be deferred while the addition at Ish is constructed. The community could continue to use the cafeteria facilities for as long as desired, while future use of the old building is determined. One suggestion might be to lease it for a nominal sum and required maintenance and operational expenses to the Annie Casey Foundation for their use as an administrative headquarters. IBtimate use or sale could await future developments. A simple chart illustrating the above concepts follows. While ultimate costs of this group of alternative proposals will be largely determined by how much is demanded and/or required to be done at the buildings to be given up after only one year of further pupil use. we believe that by careful selection, the entire program of new construction can be provided close to the the cost parameters previously suggested. If this is done, more than a thousand pupils. and perhaps as many as 1500, could benefit by these new and improved facilities. We further believe that these proposals for new construction can be completed within a time frame actually and realistically required for the previously proposed projects. We therefore recommend that they be given serious consideration, if our original recommendations are not acceptable. Time Frame for Facilities Improvement The consultants. based upon their combined experience of almost one hundred years of responsible leadership involving literally billions of dollars in school plant planning. construction and operational development in widely scattered geographic areas, believe that any proposed development of new or significantly improved school facilities must involve substantial amounts of time. School districts are typically enshrouded in massive amounts of regulatory procedures or \"red tape,\" which cannot be legally ignored. Boards of education and their staffs take many mandated. specifically stipulated legal actions to employ qualified engineers and architects. to procure financing, to hold public hearings, to advertise for bids, to approve architectural plans, -17- and to seek approval from various state, local and federal authorities having responsibilities for conformance with such things as fire, electrical, health, safety, zoning, and sanitary codes. labor laws, anti-discrimination regulations. and minimal education standards, etc. When finally approved, specifications and bids must be advertised for stipulated minimum periods of time, and contracts must be legally awarded within the parameters of literally thousands of Court decisions concerning such awards. Many of these statutes and regulations require time periods which are beyond the immediate control of the local board. Fortunately for Little Rock, Federal Court intervention may indeed expedite or \"short circuit\" some such procedures. Nevertheless, it is always also true that such things as shortages. procurement of critical building materials, approval of alternate components, preparation of shop drawings, selection of subcontractors, clarification of specification requirements, possible labor difficulties, delayed inspections and approval by regulatory bodies for code compliance, inclement weather. necessary change orders as work progresses. and many similar or unforeseen obstacles may delay progress of the work. In our experience. many of these delays occur, whether the total project be large or small. In general, it is our experience that such contrasting projects as a small elementary school addition or a massive new high school take a minimum of thirteen months for completed construction. In practice. larger contractors employ larger work forces and seem to have more \"clout\" in expediting necessary non-construction aspects of the projects. Consideration of all the required legal processes, adequate planning time, proper supervision and inspection of the work in progress. and final acceptance of the work typically require a year to a year and a half of elapsed time. We see no reason to believe that the time frame for Little Rock's construction procedures would be significantly different from those in other areas. While it is true that by utilizing overtime shifts. double-time labor, and paying premium prices for various components, and by using and paying for completion penalty and liquidated damages clauses in contracts. work progress can sometimes be significantly accelerated, we believe the proposed financing levels for Little Rock's school modification and construction projects leave little room for any such practices. Addendum The following material shows the original planned major enhancements for the seven racially identifiable schools. The suggested action for buildings that may be replaced or combined are shown in this compilation as alternative moves. The alternative suggestions are included In the summary of costs that appeared above. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Washington Elementary School Implementation Schedule Strategies Employ architect\ndevelop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance Projects to be accomplished Washington Elementary School Interior Toilet partitions Painting Floor tile, cafeteria Carpeting, classroom Exterior Partial re-roof Window replacement Clean and waterproof exterior Plumbing Piping and fixture replacement Heating and Ventilating All new system, HV only Air condition cafeteria Electrical All new system Other Equipment -18- New furnishing and equipment storage in classrooms, sinks in classrooms, modify chalkboard heights Subtotal Special conditions (10%), miscellaneous (5%), contingency (5%), professional services (lOOAi) Total building upi,:ade Site Development Paving and curbs Play areas Grassed areas Planting Outdoor equipment Security Miscellaneous Deadline Current Alternative 4-1-88 6-1-88 7-1-88 7-1-88 8-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 8-15-88 2-1-89 2-1-89 3-1-89 3-1-89 Estimated Cost Orlg1na1 Alternative 10,500 9,450 9,450 2,500 2,500 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25,800 12,000 40,000 167,300 10,000 10,000 154,400 18,230 13,000 500,180 54,950 150,000 12,000 650,230 66,950 30,000 5,050 32,650 8,850 4,050 4,050 4,500 3,000 Washington EL School (cont'd.) Subtotal - Site Contingency Total Grand Total Rockefeller Elementary School Implementation Schedule Strateflies Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance Projects to be accomplished, Rockefeller Elementary School Waterproof outside wall. early childhood area Roof repairs Repair HV AC units Repair carpeting Subtotal - Building Site development Play areas Grassed areas Planting Outdoor equipment Miscellaneous Subtotal - Site Total -19- 88,100 4,400 92,500 742,730 4,400 75,400 DeadHne Current Alternative 4-1-88 5-15-88 5-15-88 ~15-88 6-1-88 7-1-88 6-15-88 7-15-88 8-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 9-15-88 E8tlmat.ed Cost Original Alternative 2,CXX\u0026gt; 2,CXX\u0026gt; 12,000 12,CXX\u0026gt; 8,CXX\u0026gt; 8,CXX\u0026gt; um 2.CXX\u0026gt; 24,CXX\u0026gt; 24,000 2,330 2,330 10,320 10,320 8,950 8,950 5,850 5,850 um um 29,350 29,350 53,350 53,350 . Garland Elementary School Implementation Schedule Strategies Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance Projects to be accomplished, Garland Elementary School Interior Portable stage for cafeteria Stage storage Replace toilet floor tiles Repartition all toilet rooms Replace tack strips and bulletin boards Replace carpeting Paint interior Plumbing Replace all flush valves Replace sinks with vanities Electro-Mechanical Additional electrical service A/ C with window units Exterior Re-roof Clean and waterproof exterior masonry Site Development Build flammable storage Paving/ curbs Play areas Grassed area Planting Outdoor equipment Security Retaining wall construction Subtotal Miscellaneous. fees, contingency Total -20- Deadline Current Alternative 4-1-88 5-15-88 5-15-88 6-1-88 6-1-88 7-15-88 6-15-88 8-1-88 8-1-88 9-15-88 9-15-88 ~ Estimated Cost Original Alternative 1.em 7$X) 6,500 8,00'.) 2.00J 10,500 1,500 1,500 40,000 10,00'.) 13,500 13.500 3,500 3,500 l,OOJ 1,00'.) 2,00J 2,00'.) 32,700 00,00'.) 12,00'.) 2.500 18,250 30,00'.) 5,500 10,300 8.950 14,500 15.700 30.500 305,300 91.500 15,00'.) 396,890 86.300 r:---- Stephens Elementary School : Implementation Schedule Strategies Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance -21- \"The consultants view the elapsed time suggested there as insufildent. The project involves construction of a gym. total replacement of electrtcal and heating. ventilation and air conditioning system. replacing ceilings. replacing windows. and the like. In our judgment the project will take thirteen months at least to complete. Project to be accomplished. Stephens Elementary School Plumbing Replace plumbing fixtures. pipes. fountains. 1950 unit Extertor Replace all windows. 1950 unit Replace window operators Paint all trim Reroof, partial Interior Carpet all classrooms and replace asphalt tile Replace suspended ceilings. 1950 unit Install insulation. 1950 unit Refinish interior. doors. walls. paint. etc. Install new toilet partitions Electro-Mechanical All new electrical system All new HVAC system Subtotal for Building Misc. fees. special conditions. contingency@ 300Ai Total for building New Construction Multipurpose gym Fees. contingency. equipment. 20% Total new construction Deadffne CW:rent Altemative 5-15-88 7-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 1-1-89* 2-1-89* 5-15-88 7-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 9-1 to 12-1-ffi 10-1-89 to 1-1-00 Estimated Cost Orlg1nal Alternative 40,000 24,000 1.460 1,430 58,650 51.600 10,100 4.0C.O 23,100 13,650 107,250 179,000 515,150 154.550 669,700 191,750 38.350 230.100 Stephens El. School (cont'd.) Slte Development Develop plan Paving play area. walks Grass area Planting trees and shrubs Fencing Equipment Lighting Subtotal Misc. fees. contingency. 15% Total site work Grand total -22- The alternative is to build a new school replacing Stephens and Garland Demolition New construction \"The approximate cost for the Carver Magnet School. recently bid and unde::- construction. was this amount. Martin Luther Klng, Jr. Elementary School Implementation Schedule strate2:1es Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance \"The consultants view the current tJme schedule as optimistic. In the judgment of the consultants this project.will take a minimum of nine months to complete.  Projects to be accomplished, Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary School .s.afm:: Enclose fire stairs (south) Provide fire stairs (north end and from auditorium) Replace wood transoms with fire-rated enclosure San1tarv Replace all piping and plumbing fixtures 2.9f.O 5.5CO 19.000 9.750 11.200 4.200 rum 56,450 8.470 64.900 964.700 so.cm 2.soo.000 Deadftne Current .Alternative 4-1-88 7-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 2-1-89 3-1-89* 5-15-88 7-1-88 8-1-88 8-15-88 4-15-89 5-15-89 Fat:hnated ~..est Orig1nal Alternative 2.990 9,800 4.700 87.500 2.990 Martin Luther King (cont'd.) Stn.ictural -23-  nderpin and repair wall and floor slab. remove north sta.trs and en- 3.S:CO close are:i. Roof Re-roof 1949 and 1953 sections Exte!\"!or Repair masonry anc! repair wood w1ndows and sills Interior Install new tile ceilings. 1939 and 1949 units with Insulation Install doors. toilet panitions Replace floor.ng, all classrooms. cafeteria and audltortum Electro-Mechanical Remove present elecL-tcal service over roof. install proper equipment in new switch gear location. Including distribution Rewire for increased fi.-ctures. outlets and unit ventilators, 1937 and 1949 ur,its Install new fixtures throughout Install new heating system Subtotal. building Misc .. special conditions. fees. contingency @ 30% Total bulld!n~ Site Work Pavtng/curbing, including driveway and parking for 30 cars Curbs Walks Steps Play area basketball court Retaining wails at drive Retaining walls at west play field All grassed areas Planting and shrubbery Equipment Playground Baseball backstops Soccer goals Security lighting poles Security feIJ.cing Tree removal and clear stumps Subtotal. site work Misc .. fees. continge:::icy. 20% 12.300 2.240 14.750 2.830 45,000 40,950 75,00) 48,750 227.500 579,310 173.790 753,100 8,970 7\n3SJ 5,46) 3.250 5,00) 24,700 37,400 25,700 4,940 8,400 2,275 975 6.lCO 10.300 ~ 156,670 31.3.:0 12.300 2.240 2.830 20,36) 29.620 8.970 7::BJ s.a:o 8,45:) 2.275 975 ~ 38.820 7,7fJJ Martin Luther King (cont'd.) Total. site work Additional Upgrading Air conditioning Replace windows with aluminum Double-hung, double-glazed sash Equipment Painting and finishing Build greenhouse Build outside flammable storage building Subtotal. additional Misc .. fees. contingency, 30% Total. additional upgrading Grand total I Mitchell Elementary School , Implementation Schedule Strategies Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance Projects to be accomplished, Mitchell Elementary School Air condition. window units Additional electric service Clean and waterproof exterior Paint interior Build outside flammable storage Replace or repair bulletin boards and tack strips Site work Subtotal Misc., fees, contingency, 30% Grand total -24- 188,000 46,500 63,375 62,400 40,000 19,200 10,000 ~ 2,500 197,475 59,240 256,715 2,500 1,197,815 78,700 rounded to 00,CfXJ Deadline Current Alternative 4-1-88 5-15-88 6-1-88 7-1-88 1-1-89 2-1-89 5-15-88 6-7-88 6-15-88 7-1-88 11-1-88 12-1-88 Estimated Cost Original Alternative 33,900 5,CfXJ 12,000 12,000 2,500 1,500 15,000 81,900 24,570 106,470 33,900 5,000 12,000 12,000 2,500 1,500 15,000 81,900 24.570 106,470 Ish Elementary School Implementation Schedule -25- This schedule ls for implementation of Items on current schedule and does not Include schedule for new construction. The site work planned for Ish should be scheduled after new construction Is completed. Strategies Employ architect Develop specs and bid project Award construction contracts Develop critical path schedule Complete construction Owner's acceptance Projects to be accomplished, Ish Elementary School Exterior Exterior walls. clean and waterproof Additional electrical and wiring Roof repairs Replace flush valves Interior Install glass partitions to sound-isolate cafeteria Install acoustic material on wall panels Carpet classrooms Replace louvered door with wall 1n ALP room Subtotal. building Misc .. fees. contingency. 20% Total. building Site work. Incl. fees. contingency Grand total Deadline Current Alternative 4-1-88 5-1-88 5-21-88 6-7-88 8-1-88 8-21-88 5-12-88 6-7-88 6-21-88 7-1-88 8-15-88 8-28-88 Esttmated Cost Original Alternative 12,000 12,000 15,000 15,000 1,500 1,500 3.500 3.500 3,640 3,640 1.500 1.500 25.500 25.500 2W) ~ 65,440 65.440 13.100 13.100 78,540 78,540 ~ il.2.3.Q 124,770 124,770 Section 3 The School Buildings of Little Rock The School Buildings of Little Rock It has been said that 'What the wisest and best informed parent would want for the education of his or her child. the Board of Education should seek to provide for the education of all the children of all parents.\" In conformity with this challenging axiom. the Board of Education of Little Rock and its chief administrators have sought objective information to assist them In arriving at decisions and establishing policies that will provide maximal educational opportunities for the youth of the community. One of the important ingredients of an effective educational system to provide such optimal educational opportunities for all citizens is the school plant, which works as a tool to assist the instructional staff. Students learn best when school facilities provide an effective learning environment. Eight years ago, the Little Rock School District sought the services of the present consultants to evaluate the buildings and sites, to judge how they were maintained and operated, to consider how they were used by the public they served, and to determine how their physical settings support the process of education of children attending the public schools of the district. The findings of that 1980-81 study were published in a two-part report that provided specific information as the basis for specific recommendations and specific cost estimates for implementing the changes so recommended. Because the passage of time and events have validated much of the proposals and cost estimates then made, the consultants were asked to again study the physical facilities, to review the impact of national and local demographic changes and trends, and to update their recommendations on physical facility needs and priorities and the cost estimates related thereto. Early and particular emphasis and attention was to be given to the facility needs of seven racially identifiable schools, as well as to an objective evaluation of how those needs were related to the totality of facility needs within the expanded boundaries of the enlarged Little Rock School District. In response to this multifaceted assignment, the consultants have provided preliminary and updated versions of their findings on the racially identifiable schools, have completed the demographic studies and projects, and are herewith submitting this third aspect of their report, suggesting the prioritized needs and current cost estimates of physical improvements in each of the school buildings within the system. Each school was given expert and careful examination of buildings and site conditions. Comments, suggestions and concerns of administrators and staff in each building were carefully noted. Comparative evaluations of the impact of observed conditions upon both building operational efficiency and integrity and educational effectiveness were established. Based upon these evaluations, preliminary task lists and cost estimates were established. In conferences with the Director of Plant Services and Maintenance and his two top assistants, these preliminary lists were then updated and prioritized as the most pressing needs for each facility. As each school facility was visited, the consultants checked the recommendations made in the 1980-81 study and determined which poor conditions had been corrected, which recommended -2- improvements had been carried out, and which poor conditions still existed or had been exacerbated by almost eight years of additional continued wear and deterioration. In a very real sense, the perspective given by this two-fold exposure over an extended time period gave the consultants added effectiveness In forming their judgments on priorities and projected costs. The consulting cost expert, who had compiled the initial cost estimates of the 1980-81 study. then took the task lists and updated costs of the former tasks yet remaining, and the reported new condition and proposed projects that were observed and listed at visits to the various buildings in April and May. As a further step in the process. the consultants discussed the educational impact of perceived plant needs with various administrative instructional personnel and also considered the goals sought by the desegregation and assignment programs, which are the primary determinants of actual enrollments in each individual Little Rock school. After this information had been collected and the demographic study reports had been compiled and submitted. the final parameters of the study were more clearly defined by several board policy decisions and actions related to the facilities situation. The Board acted with dispatch in authorizing work related to the major and minor enhancement programs as recommended to and accepted by the court. The Board agreed that the Washington and King Schools should be closed. It approved the recommendation for an addition to Franklin and directed that architects be assigned for designing a replacement school for Washington. It further stated that Stephens School should be replaced, but preferably not on the existing Stephens site. In addition, the work on the major and minor enhancement schools was to proceed, even though the responsibility for. and ultimate sharing of, costs for such work are yet to be determined by the courts. Under such authorization, this work has proceeded effectively and with dispatch. The Board has further authorized funding for certain major roofing projects of approximate costs of $1.5 million, plus approximately $3 million for air conditioning all the classrooms in those schools that do not now have such an important environmental improvement. as well as an additional sum of approximately $500,000 for Exxon energy grants. As a most significant and far-reaching step, the Board, supported by effective volunteer community executive, professional. and industrial leaders. has courageously decided to submit a referendum request for approval of an 8 mil tax increase. This additional levy is to apply 2.5 mils to physical plant improvement. with a minimum annual income to support an approximately $20 million program. In working with the Director of Facilities and Maintenance and his two assistants, the consultants sought final reviews of proposed work, work to be accomplished or already completed under the major and minor enhancement, air conditioning and roofing program, and ongoing maintenance. The evaluated project lists were adjusted to reflect latest costs and prioritized. Following all these steps, an adjusted program of about $18.5 million is recommended herewith. It should be noted that many prior requests for voter approval of tax increases have not been successful. However. there is a growing nationwide understanding of the importance of an effective education for all citizens for the survival of our democratic way of life. Industry has come to realize the need for an effectively educated labor force to compete successfully in the marketplace, and business understands that it is the educated consumer who provides the market for all the new and varied products and services that their enlightened customers demand. At both the state and local levels, volunteer groups of distinguished citizens from all walks of life have stepped forward and given freely of their time and talents to create an informed public 11111 II II II -3- awareness of the Importance of education and of the needed fiscal support to provide such an effective education. Their objective reviews of ongoing programs and their educational goals and results. and actual physical and fiscal realities of the local educational process can be an important motivator for significant change and improvement in the city schools. We believe that as a result of this awakened interest, the leaders of the Little Rock community can not long ignore the accelerating effects of continuous neglect of school facilities. Their informed and understanding support. plus the responsible and courageous leadership of the Board of Education and its chief administrator. can literally work wonders in producing a changed climate of public support for better education of the children who are the principal ingredient of the future of Little Rock. As a concomitant aspect of this report. we wish to point out that any program for the improvement of school facilities cannot overlook the fact that it is human beings who must operate, use. maintain, repair, preserve and protect the tremendous public investment in those facilities . As consultants. with broad knowledge of comparative educational operations elsewhere. we believe that custodial care and operation of Little Rock schools can be substantially Improved. We believe the recommendations we made in 1980-81 for the better organization, more adequate staffing, and Improved and increased supervision and training of the school custodial, maintenance and operations staff are now more important than they were eight years ago. We decry the almost impossible work load placed upon the Director of Facilities and Maintenance. and we reiterate our recommendations with respect to the importance of increasing and reorganizat!ng staff support for the supervision of this costly public service. The Little Rock School District has increased the district's school facilities by fourteen school buildings. increasing by roughly one-third the floor area to its maintenance operations and custodial work loads. It has not added any supervisory or administrative staffing in maintenance or operations to affect either the prior inadequacies or the added load of the additional facilities. We believe that continuance of such a situation is \"penny wise and pound foolish.\" These comments and recommendations for additional staff assistance are in no way intended to imply that the Director and his present limited staff are failing to produce. In fact. the work accomplished in the past semester and short summer season on the magnet schools, and in getting work done in the major enhancement and minor enhancement schools. while at the same time carrying on urgent and necessary repairs in all other buildings, is a magnificent accomplishment. The Board of Education can indeed be proud of the fact that so much has been accomplished, in so short a time and by so very few. However, it is both unrealistic and unreasonable to expect that such a pace can continue for very long. To emphasize our concern, we also strongly recommend that if the millage for plant and facilities improvement is enacted. the district should immediately provide an assistant to the Director of Facilities and Maintenance. We further recommend that engineering and architectural services should be provided and district-wide specifications and bids be used in such a manner as to \"cluster,\" or to bring together many similar type projects in the various buildings (such as roofing, air conditioning, new intercom systems, rewiring, relighting. etc.) . By contractual services, such design people can help ensure district-wide fixed responsibility and the authority and opportunity to make on-the-Job decisions to foster prompt continuance of the work. Use of Planning Committees The best planning for adequate educational facilities should involve the input of those who, by experience, judgment, knowledge and technical skills. can contribute to the successful design of superior and effective teaching tools. Administration can foster such input by the creation of organized procedures for gathering these insights or inputs and transmitting them to the persons entrusted with the design of such facilities. Planners can be helped in such diverse -4- fields as instruction, administration. community and personnel use. maintenance, operations. and civic pride and citizenship education. as they go about their work. Who best can tell what Is necessary or desirable for effective teaching in various subject areas? Who can ensure that architects design a facility that will facilitate learning by pupils? Who can tell what facilities help an administrator to best operate a school program in harmony with student. community and staff needs? Who can tell how best to design a kitchen or lunch room layout. or to assist in designing facilities for proper custodial care and operation? The answer. seasoned by use in countless communities. lies in creating planning committees of administrators and staff experts who pool their knowledge to create educational specifications, as well as material specifications. thereby advising architects and engineers on desirable design elements. and who can screen out obvious design ''bloopers\" before they are transformed into enduring concrete and steel that forever plague their users during the life of a facility. The consultants have strongly recommended, and are pleased to observe. that such planning committees are being created to assist and strengthen the designing of future projects. In commenting upon the form of this report, we state that because we are aware of the existence and use of copies of our voluminous prior reports in various administrative offices, we have not included a reiteration of those reports here. Copies of significant aspects of such reports can be readily produced in administrative offices whenever their use is of interest. As a final comment. we wish to thank the Board. its administrative staff, and the host of its employees for the absolute cooperation, patient assistance, and supportive actions of all personnel, which have assisted in the production of this report. We trust that it will contain much useful information for the improvement of educational opportunities for the youth of Little Rock. Respectfully submitted. Stanton Leggett Frederick Hill Stanton Leggett and Associates Ill -5- An Extended Overview: Further Comments Priorities and Costs in the Preceding Listings. We have indicated those projects that the consultants believe will be most significant to improving the service life and educational utility of the present school buildings. We have intentionally leveled the total cost of these priority needs to a sum less than the proposed $20 million \"ceiling\" envisioned by an eight mil increase. There is no accurate way to determine the time frame that will pass, nor to determine the economic climate that will prevail. before specific projects are undertaken. nor can we guess what unexpected breakdown or emergencies may occur in the intermittent time period. We have consulted with top staff in establishing the estimated cost and priority of the included items, but the final responsibility of this listing rests with us alone. It is our intent that the difference between our listing and the amounts made available by an increased millage shall serve as a cushion to absorb any changes in cost, to cover emergency items, and to provide some leeway to permit the inclusion of some additional items that may be strategically or politically desirable. Administrative Facilities. We have not included any projects for the betterment of administrative facilities. Without question. much money could be spent to provide more adequate housing for those administrative and instructional services now housed at Lee and the administrative anne.'\u0026lt;:. Maintenance and Operations needs additional and more effective space and equipment. The main administration building and Board service areas could be improved. The food service function and equipment storage are poorly housed. There is need for housing an extended personnel function. The purchasing department requests more space and double decking some of its present space, etc. We have evaluated all such needs to presently be of lower priority than the needs of the individual school buildings. Moreover. lf and when the new school facilities are constructed. administrative use of old facilities then released may be carefully considered. Ultimately, also, such administrative needs may be again reconsidered each time a subsequent bond or current improvement program Is established. Failure to include any such item in our present listing may be viewed unhappily by those with genuine needs\nnevertheless, it is the consultants' recommendation that they not be included at this time. The Specter of Asbestos. The Board of Education and its staff have sought and received careful engineering evaluation of all locations of asbestos within the Little Rock schools. They have complied with all inspection and rectification and removal procedures related thereto. In those few remaining locations where it exists. it is safety encapsulated and in non-friable condition. Nevertheless. the environmental agency regulators continue to grind out increasingly tough and almost bizarre regulations. In some instances. observing all their rules can cause a $300 ceiling or floor tile repair to cost thousands of dollars. Then sometimes what starts out as replacement of a leaky pipe, obsolete lighting fixture, or broken floor tile can become a nightmare of unbudgeted (and many believe unwarranted) expenditures of scarce public funds for asbestos removal. It is not unrealistic to estimate that perhaps as much as $3 or $3.5 million could be required as an auxiliary hidden cost of some of the electrical-mechanical corrections and improvements that may become necessary in the future. Air Conditioning Program. The Board of Education has wisely provided for the air conditioning of all classrooms that do not have it now. However, there are many cafeterias, auditoriums, gymnasiums, offices, and work rooms and conference areas that could also be so -6- equipped. This will undoubtedly be requested for future consideration. and additional funding would then be required. Portable Replacement. In June of this year. the Little Rock School District used 64 portable buildings. of which seventeen were judged to be \"below standard.\" or in poor condition. Their many problems, such as leaky roofs, deteriorated floors and structural elements, damaged siding. vandalized utilities. unsightly appearance, etc .. make it neither economically feasible nor desirable to repair them. It makes good sense to use portables to house temporary peaks in a growing school population. When capital funds for new construction are hard to come by, portables provide a way out. However. in areas of declining population or In those cases where a school's enrollment is determined not by residence but by assignment. the need for portables can be anticipated and controlled. In the case of Little Rock. where all such factors are prevalent, it is likely that portables will be needed in the foreseeable future . We believe a ten-year program of replacing about six portables per year, if all portables are to be eventually replaced. or a three-year program involving the 17 worst present ones. is called for. Replacement of these would be desirable. Staff has estimated that local costs for either program would be approximately $100,000 per year. Window Replacement. There are many inefficient and obsolete windows in various Little Rock school buildings. Windows can be a source of both light and delight to the occupants of school classrooms. We believe most teachers and most pupils prefer the airy and spacious feeling of larger, old-fashioned windows in high-ceilinged rooms, rather than the claustrophobic atmosphere that prevails in some modem school rooms with low ceilings. non-opening windows. and single-slit windows with constant need for operational. artificial means of illumination and ventilation. There is a clearly existing modem reconsideration of the many functipns of windows. as well as genuine concern that the closed recirculation of air in some modem ventilation and air conditioned systems is contributing greatly to a higher incidence of respiratory illnesses and infections. Nevertheless. despite the controversies that may be involved, it is a fact of life that spiraling energy costs have spawned the need for forced replacement of many leaky and rotten old windows and window casings in many buildings. and we believe that many of such replacements. at a cost of approximately $350 per window opening, may be anticipated. Needed New High Schools. As population changes now are indicated. the major growth of school population could possibly occur in the areas east of the airport complex where the Badgett and new Carver schools are serving. There is more opportunity for entry-level rental and purchase of homes in this area than in other sectors of the city. At some future date, these residents could demand secondary school facilities. In the area west of 430 and north of 300, there is indicated growth of expensive apartments. condominiums. and more expensive single-family dwellings. Should economic conditions change enough to decrease such construction, less expensive housing units with families likely to have older children of high school age might be erected and at some point local high school facilities could be demanded. Likewise, in the area west of Chicot and south of Baseline. the availability of land for middleincome. single-family dwellings, which would likely be purchased by older family groups having few elementary but some secondary age children. could require new high school facilities in this area. Moreover. the gradual deterioration of older existing high schools could make the replacement with new buildings economically desirable. At such time the new buildings could be relocated and could be the result of abandoning and/ or consolidating older high schools. II -7- Other Needed Schools. Current nationwide demographic data indicate that the populations of core areas of many cities are declining, as residents are moving to the outskirts of the city and into suburban areas. Despite inmigration, the total enrollment in most given areas of the inner cities has declined. In Little Rock, similar factors are at work. There is a perceived westward trend of the center of population. The older sections of the city have older school buildings and generally smaller enrollments. To ensure good educational opportunities for inner-city children, to provide more economical services with less overhead and administrative cost, and to economically replace antiquated structures, at some point it becomes feasible and desirable to replace. and in some cases to consolidate, these older, smaller units. Such trends and opportunities should be carefully monitored, and future bond issues may be required for such new construction. Instructional and Operational Equipment. Much of the instructional equipment in the Little Rock schools has been updated, and the use of computers and vartous audio-visual devices has been introduced into every building. Nevertheless. there is much in the way of antiquated and obsolescent furniture, laboratory desks. demonstration equipment. teaching stations, and 1V and VCR equipment, and limited supplies of items of such nature as musical equipment, art, science and health instructional equipment, shop equipment, and office equipment that should be updated or increased in quantity and capacity. Other costly equipment, such as truck and bus fleets. tractors, mowers. and all manner of maintenance, operation and custodial care devices, should be placed on long-term replacement cycles. Central office bookkeeping, accounting, word processing, and duplication equipment, as well as sophisticated data processing and data and record filing and retrieval equipment are all developing and changing at a rapid pace and are becoming essential purchases of modern school districts. Other kinds of costly equipment. in such areas as security controls, energy management. pupil accounting, personnel records, purchase and supply management, automated maintenance and Job controls, etc., indicate an ever increasing potential cost of equipment in Little Rock schools of the future, and much of such purchasing will likely be initially fmanced by bond funds. These various factors are highlighted together in this section merely to alert those interested in the wider concerns that may well be involved in future capital budget planning. They are not recommended or included in the initial listing of priority needs, but they are classes of recurring need that must eventually be considered for inclusion in a future listing. -8- Fiscal Capacity for Capital Improvement Programs Bonds Outstanding. Any proposals for long-term capital Improvements In the Little Rock public schools must realistically consider the existing and potential financial capacity of the district to support such programs. A study of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the district. as of June 30, 1989, indicates that there will be $43,395,081 in bonds owed, of which $3,035,529 will be due and payable as of that date. This indebtedness covers thirteen Issue dates, from December 1, 1965 through June 1, 1988, with more than one-half the total Indebtedness being from nine to over twenty years old and approximately one-fifth being less than two years old. This is a good \"spread\" and provides a stable base for any future debt service schedule. A listing of outstanding bonds is presented below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Schedule of Bonds Outstanding as of June 30, 1989, Litt le Rock School District Maturity Maturity Date Prior to After Original Interest Issued 6/30/89 6/30/89 Total Amount Rate 12-1-65 199,000 1,606,000 1,805,000 4,485,000 3.60 12-1-67 138,000 144,000 282,000 1,963,000 4.50 12-1-70 110,000 241,000 351,000 1,586,200 5.00 4-1- 73 185,000 193,000 378,000 2,410,300 4.90 6-1-73 120,000 705,000 825,000 2,051,000 5.00 6-1-77 350,000 3,565,000 3,915,000 6,482,700 5.10 3-1- 79 260,000 4,160,000 4,420,000 6,134,565 6.00 3-1-80 335,000 2,670,000 3,005,000 4,889,200 6.00 3-1-84 0 Refunded 8.30 11-1-85 0 Refunded 8.50 6-1-87 50,000 7,776,000 7,826,000 7,826,000 7.70 5-15-88 5,512,750 5,512,750 5,512,750 7.20 6-1-88 131,000 3,240,000 3,371,000 3,371,000 6.60 PCSSD* 1,157,529 10,546,802 11,704,331 3,035,529 40,359,552 43,395,081 *Please note that when various Pulaski County schools were absorbed into the Little Rock school system, the accompanying bonded indebtedness was also transferred into the total amounts shown. -9- Debt Service Requirements. Toe tax loading Imposed by outstanding bonds constitutes a mortgage upon all future revenues of the school district until the bonds are amortized. In addition to the prtnclpal cost. the district taxpayers must also provide the interest required at varying rates for the Individual issues, and such total of maturity and Interest payments constitute the debt service requirements of the district In each year until all maturities are paid. Table 2 summarizes the declining maturity value of bond prtncipal payments due In succeeding fiscal years until present debt Is paid. TABLE 2 Present Bond Maturities Payable by Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Maturities Ending June 30 Payable 1989 3 ,035,529 1990 3 ,224,798 1991 3 ,299 ,093 1992 3,377,525 1993 3,455,282 1994 3,694,616 1995 3,613,462 1996 1,930,577 1997 2 ,945,463 1998 1,335,625 1999 2 ,450,737 2000 1,750,882 2001 1,125,458 2002 1,216,882 2003 1,310,155 2004 960,000 2005 1,040,000 2006 1,120,000 2007 1,210,000 2008 1,300,000 43,396,084\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"suc_abaker_4483","title":"Letter, 1988, Sandra Euster to Augusta Baker","collection_id":"suc_abaker","collection_title":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","dcterms_contributor":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Richland County, 34.0218, -80.90304","United States, South Carolina, Richland County, Columbia, 34.00071, -81.03481"],"dcterms_creator":["Euster, Sandra"],"dc_date":["1988-08-23"],"dcterms_description":["Letter from Sandra Euster, Principal, to Augusta Baker, thanking her for her \"excellent inservice presentation\" and hoping they can work together again in the future."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998","Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998, Box 2, Folder 137. Accession 11770"],"dcterms_subject":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998--Correspondence","African American women librarians","Children's librarians","African American librarians","Women librarians","Euster, Sandra--Correspondence"],"dcterms_title":["Letter, 1988, Sandra Euster to Augusta Baker"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of South Carolina. Libraries"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/abaker/id/4483"],"dcterms_temporal":["1970/2025"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For further information please contact The University of South Carolina, South Caroliniana Library, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":["1 item"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","Euster, Sandra"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_796","title":"Court filings: District Court, order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988-08-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","Civic leaders","School districts","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/796"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1386","title":"Proceedings: ''Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing,'' Volume IV","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1988-08-18"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School administrators","School board members","School integration","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing,'' Volume IV"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1386"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["297 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1351","title":"Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume III","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1988-08-17"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School board members","School employees","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume III"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1351"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["207 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1372","title":"Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume II","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1988-08-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","Educational law and legislation","Education and state","School administrators","School board members","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume II"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1372"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["291 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1322","title":"Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume I","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1988-08-15"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Magnet schools","School administrators","School board members","School integration","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''School Funding Hearing,'' Volume I"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1322"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["291 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1133","title":"Magnet Review Committee: Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988-08-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","Magnet schools","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Magnet Review Committee: Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1133"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nReport from Magnet Review Committee to Honorable Henry Woods, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nMagnet Review Committee Donna Grady Creer Executive Director August 12, 1988 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 The Honorable Henry Woods Judge, United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas U.S. Post Office \u0026amp; Courthouse P.O. Box 3683 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Judge Woods: The Magnet Review Committee, via this report, is responding to your request to provide information and recommendations on the issue of unfilled interdistrict magnet school seats for the 1988-89 school year. We have worked closely with the three districts, the State, and the Joshua Intervenors on this issue for several weeks and have recommended actions that will, in our estimation, benefit the interdistrict magnet school program. The 1988-89 school year will begin on August 29, 1988. The need is urgent to move quickly as a judgment in this matter affects decisions on transportation, budgeting, staffing, student assignment, and parent notification of assignment. (501) 758-0156 We request that you respond on or before August 19, 1988 to facilitate a smooth transition into the new school year. We realize that this is a deviation from the normal timeline for the Court's response but feel that the immediacy of this situation warrants swift action. The Magnet Review Committee will continue to work cooperatively in fulfilling the oversight responsibility and will make findings and recommendations as may be necessary -i- The Honorable Henry Woods -2- August 12, 1988 to effect the efficient operation and administration of the interdistrict magnet school program. Sincerely, ~~~ Marcia Harding, ck'airperson Arkansas Department of Education ft.~~4gt} Pulaski County Syecial School Distr/2:ct ~t~ad/ Little Rock School District )j~ ~ Jame s Smith North Little Rock School District MH:sl Enclosure -ii- R~e~ Arkansas Department of Education ~ LJ Evelyn Jackson Joshua Intervenors ~ Donna Grady er Executive Director, MRC MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE COURT August 12, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Report Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Recruitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Simulation Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Magnet Assignments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Appendices: Appendix A - Magnet Review Committee Letter to Court . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Appendix B - Court Response to the Magnet Review Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix C Appendix D - Simulation Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - Magnet Assignments/Vacancies/Waiting Lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Appendix E Appendix F - Parkview Capacity Information......... 15 - Debt Service Information ...... .... .... 16 BACKGROUND The issue of unfilled seats was addressed in the original Stipulation regarding the interdistrict magnet school program. The information listed below provides background data on the Court-adopted guidelines for filling vacant seats in the 1987-88 school year: \"On July 15, 1987, fifty percent of any unfilled magnet seats allocated to North Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District will be released and made available to the Little Rock School District students. On August 3, 1987, 80% of any NLRSD and PCSSD unfilled seats will be released and on August 24, 1987, 100% of the NLRSD and PCSSD unfilled seats will be released and made available to LRSD.\" The Magnet Review Committee recognized the need to address the issue of unfilled seats for the 1988-89 school year and, on June 30, 1988, initiated contact with the Court regarding a delay in determining the disposition of vacant interdistrict magnet seats until August 15, 1988, so that the Magnet Review Committee might recommend a course of action to the Court. (See Appendix A.) By letter, the Court granted the Magnet Review Committee's request and, additionally, required a report and accompanying data be filed on or before August 15, 1988. (See Appendix B.) -1- I I RECRUITMENT The Magnet Review Committee, the Magnet Educational Team, and each of the three districts have made every effort to recruit students for vacant seats in the interdistrict magnet schools for the 1988-89 school year. Listed below and attached is a recap of some of the recruitment activities, all of which were approved by the Magnet Review Committee as recruitment tools. Recruitment Efforts Print Media: The Magnet Educational Team has placed recruitment ads in the following newspapers: Arkansas Democrat - main news ads and flyers Arkansas Gazette Arkansas State Press North Little Rock Times Maumelle Monitor Spectrum High School Newspapers: Joe T. Robinson, Jacksonville, and Sylvan Hills Radio: The Magnet Educational Team has generated Public Service Announcements and/or recruitment ads on the following stations: KABF KARN KIPR KITA KKYK KOKY KWTD Television: The Magnet Educational Team has placed Public Service Announcements and/or paid recruitment advertising on the -2- I I I I following stations: KARK - Channel 4 KATV - Channel 7 KJTM - Channel 38 KLRT - Channel 16 KTHV - Channel 11 Brochure Distribution: The Magnet Educational Team and the Magnet Review Committee collaboratively produced 70,000 brochures. In addition to student/parent distribution, several thousand brochures have been distributed via: The three school districts The Arkansas Department of Education Area real estate agents Area hospitals Area grocery stores Selected area churches Selected area businesses Speaking Engagements: Donna Grady Creer, Executive Director of the Magnet Review Committee and Magnet Educational Team liaison, addressed the following groups on the interdistrict magnet school program and Magnet Educational Team recruitment efforts: Williams Magnet Gibbs Magnet Booker Magnet Parkview Magnet Mann Magnet Jacksonville Rotary Club Junior League of Little Rock Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Little Rock Chapter Delta Kappa Gamma Sorority, Little Rock Chapter Parents in the Mills High/Fuller Junior High/PCSSD area Other Activities: Students from all magnet schools appeared at local civic and professional functions including: 9th Annual Conference for the National Committee for School Desegregation Riverfest State Capitol -3- I I I I I I I Two groups of students representing each Parkview Arts Magnet High School theme area (visual arts, vocal music , instrumental music, drama, and dance) made recruitment visits to all North Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District junior high schools. Magnet Review Committee Director and staff, and the three district Student Assignment Officers and staff placed calls to parents of students on waiting lists to generate interest in available interdistrict magnet school openings. Magnet Educational Team members hand- delivered announcements regarding available vacancies to area churches. During Fest '88, scheduled for August 19 and 20, 1988, the Magnet Educational Team and selected interdistrict magnet school students will staff a booth to provide information on the interdistrict magnet school program. The Magnet Review Committee Executive Director and selected interdistrict magnet school program staff and students set up and staffed recruitment booths at Mills High School and Fuller Junior High. The Little Rock School District held open school week and open house during evening hours. The Magnet Review Committee staff attended all events. The Magnet Educational Team has produced a 15-minute slidetape for viewing by potential magnet school parents, students, and other interested parties. The slidetape and viewing machine are available for checkout at the Magnet Review Committee office. This has been, and will continue to be, utilized by the Magnet Review Committee, the Magnet Educational Team, the three districts, and interested parties. Attempts have been made to circulate recruitment flyers to area movie theaters. We anticipate a positive response in the near future. -4- SIMULATION REPORT In order for the Magnet Review Committee to consider the potential impact of moving additional Little Rock School District students into the magnet schools, Mr. James Jennings, Associate Superintendent for Desegregation, Little Rock School District, was asked to provide a simulation report which would reflect possible long-range effects upon interdistrict make-up of the magnet schools. A variety of assumptions was developed in order that the Magnet Review Committee could consider potential impact. At the elementary level, assumptions are based on filling all vacant seats whereas, at the high school level, the simulation was calculated on 100 vacancies. No simulation was necessary on the junior high magnet since it is considered filled. In analyzing the simulation report, it was apparent that moving Little Rock School District students into the vacant seats would initially increase Little Rock School District's representation in the interdistrict magnet schools beyond their stipulated allotment. However, it was also shown that, by limiting this action to only the 1988-89 school year, it would be possible in the future to move the schools toward a balanced representation by again controlling entry level district seat allocations and assigning seats vacated by attrition to North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts. The simulation report is included as Appendix C. -5- MAGNET ASSIGNMENTS The Magnet Review Committee recognized that it is preferable to tailor any solutions or remedies to the unfilled seats issue to the actual vacancies that exist within each organizational level of the program (elementary, junior high, senior high). To facilitate this, the Magnet Review Committee's Executive Director and the three Student Assignment Officers for the districts initiated a series of regular meetings to update and verify the status of student assignment, exchange information, and report to the Magnet Review Committee the current student assignment data and remaining vacancies. As much as possible, the Magnet Review Committee was provided up-to-date information on filling magnet seats, which is a fluid process. The Magnet Review Committee did then provide the Magnet Educational Team, its recruitment arm, with continually updated information on magnet vacancies so that recruitment efforts could be highly targeted. The most current written report of magnet assignments, vacant seats, and districts' waiting lists are included as Appendix D. -6- RECOMMENDATIONS The Magnet Review Committee recommends the following course of action for management of the unfilled interdistrict magnet school seats for the 1988-89 school year. In concert with the Magnet Review Committee's belief that solutions should be tailored to organizational levels, the Magnet Review Committee identified two programs where program capacities should be adjusted downward. This is reflected in the recommendations and would result in a need to reduce the number of vacant seats shown to be available. Appendices are attached. 1. The Magnet Review Committee recommends that the capacity of Parkview Arts Magnet be reduced by 100 students - from 1,150 to 1,050 (see Appendix E). 2. The Magnet Review Committee recommends that the Little Rock School District attempt to fill 100 additional Parkview Arts Magnet vacant seats from the Little Rock School District waiting lists. In selecting students to fill seats at Parkview Arts Magnet, there must be no adverse impact upon the racial balance of the sending and receiving schools. The student should express an interest, ability, or need for the vocal music or instrumental programs at Parkview, since this is the area where vacancies currently exist. 3. The Magnet Review Committee recommends a continued high level of commitment to recruitment of Pulaski County Special School District and North Little Rock School District students for the remaining Parkview Arts Magnet vacancies after Little Rock School District has attempted to fill 100 vacancies. 4. The Magnet Review Committee recommends the elimination of one Kindergarten class (20 students) at Williams Basic Skills Magnet Elementary School. This will not displace any student currently assigned to this school. 5. The Magnet Review Committee r e commends the following strategy for the remaining elementary vacancies: a. The Little Rock School District should attempt to fill the available seats from the Little Rock School District waiting lists, so long as there is no adverse effect on the racial balances of the s e nding and r e c e iving schools. -7- When filling seats available for black students, preference for seating should be given to black students in major and minor enhancement schools, so long as it does not adversely affect the racial balance of the receiving school. b. Should any seats remain unfilled after Little Rock School District has assigned students in the above manner, these seats will revert to North Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District to attempt to fill. 6. The Magnet Review Committee recommends that the arrangement agreed to by the parties and stipulated for payment of debt service on unfilled seats for the 1987-88 school year be continued for the 1988-89 school year (see Appendix F). -8- APPENDIX A Magnet Review Committee Letter to Court -9- Magnet Review Committee 22nd and Poplar P.O. Box 687 Donna Grady Creer Executive Director June 30, 1988 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 The Honorable Henry Woods Judge, United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas U. s. Post Office \u0026amp; Courthouse P. o. Box 3683 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Judge Woods: (501) 758 -3545 The Magnet Review Committee has discussed the issue of vacant interdistrict magnet school seats for the 1988-89 school year. The Little Rock School District has filled all its magnet vacancies. There are approximately 39 elementary vacancies (14 for North Little Rock School District and 25 for Pulaski County Special School District) and no junior high vacancies. At Parkview Arts Magnet there are no vacancies in the drama, visual arts, and dance areas, and there are approximately 47 North Little Rock School District vacancies and an estimated 146 Pulaski County Special School District vacancies in the vocal and instrumental music areas. During the June 28, 1988 Magnet Review Committee meeting, the Committee decided by formal motion and unanimous vote to ask the Court to: 1) allow additional time for recruitment of students from North Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District\n2) postpone the disposition of vacant interdistrict magnet seats until August 15, 1988. In the interim, the Magnet Review Committee will: a) report status of recruitment\nb) provide data on status of vacant seats and waiting lists\nc) make recommendations for disposing of remaining unfilled seats. The Honorable Henry Woods -2- June 30, 1988 We ask for a timely response to this request so that we may proceed accordingly. Please contact Donna Grady Creer if you need additional information or clarification. s:\n:,::\n~#/-~ :a\n~~~--\narding, ~::fii2.son Magnet Review Committee c: Aubrey v. Mccutcheon, Jr. Attorneys of Record Dr. Joe Austin, NLRSD Dr. George Cannon, LRSD Eddie Collins, PCSSD James Jennings, LRSD Bobby Lester, PCSSD Andrew Power, NLRSD APPENDIX B Court Response to the Magnet Review Committee -10- I I I I I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS U. s. POST Onie[ \u0026amp; C0UltT House P. o eox 3ee3 LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72203 HENRY WOODS JUDGE Ms. Marcia A. Harding Chairperson Magnet Review Corrmittee P.O. Box 687 July 7, 1988 North Little Rock, AR 72115 Dear Ms. Harding: I have received and considered your letter concerning the Magnet School vacancies. I concur in your proposal to continue recruitment from Pulaski County Special School and North Little Rock School District until August 15, 1988. On August 15, 1988, please provide to the court and Special Master Mccutcheon a detailed report on the remaining vacant magnet seats, if any. Would you indicate the schools and grades where there are vacancies, as well as the racial breakdown of those seats. Please inform both the court and Mr . Mccutcheon of the waiting lists from each district. Include each applicant's 1988-89 school assignment, his or race and 1988-89 grade level . Some additional information about the Parkview vacancies and applicants should be included if a major area of study, i.e. vocal music, is a criterion for admission . You must, of course, work closely with Mr. Mccutcheon so that he can determine the most effective desegregative use of any seats remaining after August 15. Your staff and corrmittee are to be corrmended for the outstanding work you have done. ye. yours, / C /4cJ2- / e s ,r1 Ms. Harding, Chairperson July 7, 1988 page two cc: Mr. Christopher Heller Mr. Walter Paulson Mr. M. Samuel Jones Mr. Phil Neal Mr. John W. Walker Mr. Lazar M. Palnick Ms. Hillary Rodham Clinton Mr. Aubrey V. Mccutcheon, Jr. Mr. Norman Chachkin Mr. Philip K. Lyon Mr. Stephen W. Jones Ms. Sharon Streett Mr. H. William Allen Mr. Timophy Humpheries Mr. Richard Roachell APPENDIX C Simulation Report -11- ,.....,,..1 ~ Little Rock School District August 5, 1988 TO: Donna Creer, Executive Director, Magnet Review Committee FROM: James Jennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation ~ SUBJECT: Simulation on Magnet Vacancies CC: Dr. Cannon Executive Staff Leon Adams Arma Hart Chris Heller 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 SIMULATION ON MAGNET VACANCIES Assur.iotion 1: LRSD fills all vacancies as of 8-02-88 Elementarv (8 -2-88) LRSD NLRSD PCSSD Total Oist,ic: Total 1214 259 442 1915 0/ of Enrollment 63% 1 ,1 0/ 23% , 0 \"\"!\" 10 Stipulation OI 45. 6~  15. 7~ - 38.7% ,0 District Total 1214 259 442 1915 Additional Vacancies 99 0 0 Re 11i sed Total 1313 259 442 201tl % of Enrollment 65% 13% 22% Stipulation% 45.6% 15:7% 38.7% Assumption 2: LRSD fills all vacancies as of 8-02-88, a 11 sixth graders, graduate and kindergarten seats are allocated among districts. LRSD NLRSD PCSSO Tot.= Revised Total 1313 259 442 20i.: 1988-89 Sixth Grade Seats 243 47 59 3.1s: Total W/0 6th Grade 1070 212 383 166: 1989-90 Kindergarten 100 35 85 22C (220 Seats) 1989-90 Total 1170 247 468 i3S: % of Enrollment 62% 13% 25% Stipulation% 45.6% 15.7% 38.7% Assumption 3: LRSD fills all vacancies as of 8-02-88, all 1988-89 sixth graders, graduate, all 1989-90 sixth graders, graduate\nand ki.nde1cg9-rten seats are allocated among districts. LRSD NLRSD PCSSD TOTAL 1989-90 Total 1170 247 468 1885 1989-90 Sixth Grade Seats 194 36 67 297 Total W/0 6th Grade 976 211 401 1588 1990-91 Kindergarten 100 35 85 220 (220 Seats) 1990-91 Total 1076 246 486 1808 % of Enrollment 60% 14% 27% Stipulation% 45.6% 15.7% 38.7% Assumption 4: Vacancies filled by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD LRSD NLRSD PCSSD \"TOTAL District Total 1214 259 442 10- ~ I J (8-2-88) Additional Vacancies 0 57 42 99 Revised Total 1214 316 484 201.!. % of Enrollment 60% 15.7% 24% Stipulation% 45.6% 15.7% 38.7% Assumption 5: Vacancies filled by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD, all sixth graders, graduate, and kindergarten seats are allocated among districts. LRSD NLRSD PCSSD TOTAL District Total 1214 259 442 1915 (8-02-88) Additional Vacancies 0 57 42 99 Revised Total 1214 316 484 2014 1988-89 Sixth Gr:ade Seats 243 47 59 349 Total W/0 6th Grade 971 269 425 1665 1989-90 Kindergarten 100 35 85 220 (220 Seats) 1989-90 Total 1071 304 510 1885 % of Enrollment 57% 16% 27% Stipulation% 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% Assumption 6: Vacancies filled by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD, all 1988-89 sixth graders, graduate, all 1989-90 sixth graders, graduate, and kindergarten seats are allocate~ among districts. LRSD NLRSD PCSSD TOTAL 1989-90 Total 1071 304 510 1885 1989-90 Sixth Grade Seats 194 36 67 20- - I Total W/0 6th Grade 877 268 443 153S 1990-91 Kindergarten 100 35 85 22: (220 Seats) 1990-91 Total 977 303 528 1808 % of Enrollment 54% 16.7% 29% Stipulation% 45.6% 15.7% 38.7% High School (8-2-88) Assumption 7: LRSD fills 100 vacancies at Parkview as of 8-02:88 LRSD NLRSD PCSSD District Total 562 49 254 Additional Vacancies 100 0 0 Revised Total 662 49 254 % of Enrollment 69% 5% 26% Stipulation% 33.9% 15.4% 44.7% Assumption 8: LRSD fills 100 vacancies, all twelfth graders , graduate, and seats are allocated among districts . LRSD NLRSD PCSSD Revised Total 662 49 254 1988-89 Twelfth Grade Seats 222 8 56 Total W/0 12th Grade 440 41 198 1989-90 10th Grade Seats (384 Seats) 153 59 172 1989-90 Total 593 100 370 % of Enrollment 56% 9% 35% Stipulation% 33 .9% 15.4% 44.7% ------ TOTAL 865 100 963 tenth grade TOTAL 965 286 6-o I., 38J. 1063 Assumption 9: LRSD fills 100 vacancies, all 1988-89 twelfth graders, graduate, and tenth grade seats are allocated among districts. LRSD NLRSD PCSSD 1989-90 Total 593 100 370 1989-90 Twelfth Grade Seats 195 14 90 Total W/0 12th Grade 398 86 280 1990-91 10th Grade Seats (384 Seats) 153 14* 217* 1990-91 Total 551 100 497 % of Enrollment 48% 9% 43% Stipulation% 33.9% 15.4% 44.7% *(Note: NLRSD's allocation cannot exceed 100 students. Additional seats given to PCSSD). Assumption 10 : 100 vacancies fi 11 ed by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD LRSD NLRSD PCSSD District Total 562 49 254 Additional Vacancies 0 ST 49 Revised Total 562 100 303 % of Enrollment 58% 10% 31% Stipulation% 33. 9~~ 15.4% \"44.7% TOT ..\\ L 1063 299 764 384 1148 TOTAL 86S 1CO 96:i Assumption 11: 100 vacancies filled by NLRSO \u0026amp; PCSSO, all twelfth graders, graduate, and tenth grade seats are allocated among districts. LRSO NLRSO PCSSO Revised Total 562 100 303 1988-89 Twelfth Grade Seats 222 8 56 Total W/0 12th Grade 340 92 247 1989-90 10th Grade Seats (384 Seats) 153 8* 223* 1989-90 Total 493 100 470 % of Enrollment 46% 9% 44% Stipulation% 33:9% 15 .4% 44 .7% Assumption 12: 100 vacancies filled by NLRSO \u0026amp; PCSSO, all 1988-89 twelfth graders, graduate, all 1989-90 twelfth graders, graduate, and tenth grade seats are allocated. LRSO NLRSO PCSSO 1989-90 Total 493 100 470 1989-90 Twelfth Grade Seats 195 14 90 Total W/0 12th Grade 298 86 380 1990-91 10th Grade Seats (384 Seats) 153 14* 217* 1990-91 Total 451 100 597 % of Enrollment 39% 9% 52% Stipulation% 33.9% 15.4% 44.7% *(Note: NLRSO's allocation cannot exceed 100 students. Additional seats given to PCSSO.) TOTAL 965 286 679 384 1063 TOTAL 1063 299 764 38~ 1111.s SIMULATION SUMMARY (ELEMENTARY) ASSUMPTION LRSD NLRSD PCSSD //1 LRSD fi 11 s a 11 vacancies 65% 13% 22% Stipulation % 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% //2 1989-90 62% 13% 25% Stipulation % 45.6%- 15.7% 38.7% //3 1990-91 60% 14% 27% Stipulation% 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% --------------------------------------------------------------- #4 Vacancies filled by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD 60% 15. 7% 24% Stipulation% 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% //5 1989-90 57% 16% 27% Stipulation% 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% //6 1990-91 54% 16.7% 29% Stipulation% 45.6% 15. 7% 38.7% Simulation Summary page two (SENIOR HIGH) ASSUMPTION #7 LRSD fills 100 vacancies at Parkview Stipulation% //8 1989-90 Stipulation% //9 1990-91 Stipulation% LRSD 69% 33.9% 56% 33.9% 48% 33.9% NLRSD PCSSD 5% 26% 15.4% 44.7% 9% 35% 15 .4% 44.7% 9% 43% 15.4% 44 .7% --------------------------------------------------------------- #10 Vacancies filled by NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD 58% 10% 31% Stipulation% 33.9% 15.4% 44.7% //11 1989-90 46% 9% 44% Stipulation% 33.9% 15 .4% 44.7% //12 1990-91 39% 9% 52% Stipulation % 33.9% 15 .4% 44.7% APPENDIX D Magnet Assignments -12- Little Rock School District EXCERPT ONLY August 2, 1988 To: Donna Grady Creer, Executive Director - Magnet Review Committee From: James Jennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation -::f-:5 Subject : Report on Magnet Assignments as of July 25, 1988 810 \\Ve5t Markham Street  Little Rock , Arkansas 72201  (501).3743361 LRSD B BOOKER 228 CARVER 163 GIBBS 121 WMS. 197 TOTAL . 709 ASSIGNMENTS TO ELEMENTARY MAGNETS (as of August 2, 1988) NLRSD PCSSD NB B NB B NB Total 129 33 81 116 64 651 (B- 377) (NB- 274) 79 25 51 40 98 456 (B- 228) (NB- 228) 128 26 18 21 23 337 (B- 168) (NB- 169) 169 14 11 21 59 471 (B- 232) (NB- 239) 505 98 161 198 244 1915 DISTRICT TOTAL 1214 259 442 (58% Blk) (38% Blk) (45% Blk) LRSD - 63% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 45.6%) LRSD - 14% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 15.7%) Pesso - 23% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 38.7%) % BLACK 58% 50% 50% 49% LRSD ASSIGNMENTS TO MANN ARTS \u0026amp; MATH/SCIENCE (as of August 2, 1988) PCSSD B NB B NLRSD NB B NB TOTAL % BLACK ARTS 141 125 18 29 132 46 491 (B-288) (NB-191) MATH 173 149 8 11 75 64 480 ( B-256) (NB-224) TOTAL 314 274 26 40 207 110 971 (B-547) (NB-424) DIST. TOTAL 588 66 317 (53% Blk) (39% Blk) (65% Blk) LRSD - 61% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 48.1%) NLRSD - 7% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 17.5%) PCSSD - 33% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 34.4%) 59% 53% 56% PARKVIEW DIST. TOTAL LRSO B 312 562 NB ASSIGNMENTS TO PARKVIEW ARTS MAGNET (as of August 2, 1988) NLRSD PCSSD B NB B NB TOTAL 250 25 24 160 94 865 ( B-497) (NB-368) 49 254 (56% Blk) (51% Blk) (63% Blk) LRSD - 65% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 33.9%) NLRSD - 6% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 15.4%) PCSSD - 29% of total enrollment (Stipulation - 44.7%) % BLACK 57% APPENDIX D Vacancies -13- INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL VACANCIES August 12, 1988 Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Fourth Grade Fifth Grade Sixth Grade Totals 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade Total Booker 11 0 0 2 0 0 0 13 Parkview 102 83 97 282 Carver Gibbs 0 9 7 0 5 4 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 15 16 Williams 21 8 12 11 0 0 0 52 TOTAL OF ALL VACANCIES AT INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS= 378 APPENDIX D Waiting Lists Little Rock School District -14a- BOOKER 06 GRADE SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 915586 KILLINGSWORTH MICHELLE2I 201 372-7728 CLOVERDALE 1901 BRAGG 2 915587 KILLINGSWORTH DANIELLE2). 201 372-7728 CLOVERDALE 1901 BRAGG 3 916646 BRANAM NATALIE 23 201 374-8636 DODD 9 o 7 ~ 3\", 2223 COMMERCE ST \u0026lt;72 9 \u0026lt;\nr C ':?'-' ''3 (,..'\u0026lt;' .\u0026lt;--., ,, C\\ I\":\u0026gt;. C\\.'CO \u0026lt;\"'\\ 4 917131 HOWARD ELDRIDGE 2 'f 201 375-6378 NOT ASSIGN 2021 E 38TH ST 5 915868 JACKSON DESHAWN 2s 201 375-5230 DODD 2013 COMMERCE I  6 917037 WALKER MICHAEL 1 202 758-3477 NOT ASSIGN PO BOX 45371 7 917048 GUPTON PRINCESS 2 C. 202 374-4066 NOT ASSIGN 724 CORNING 8 916468 HENRY KEVIN 27 203 372-2421 MEADOWCLIFF 1423 E llTH APT 305 9 915531 ELGEN JOHNNY l.Z 203 562-7667 GEYER SPGS 4725 HOFFMAN APT 7 10 916232 HOLMES NATASHA 2 \u0026amp;' 203 ROCKEFELLER 3324 E 9TH ST 11 916268 HOLLOWAY MIKEL 2 f 203 224-1922 TERRY 2109 ROMINE 12 916692 HANDY TORRELL 2 /a 203 375-5312 MEADOWCLIFF 91 1.,- 'J-'bt.\\ 1609 COLLEGE \"1'\"f\"~- .'.) )D'{ 51.'.i\"- IL\\\\\\ ~_\\,.\n_,\u0026lt;:--_1-,, 1\n-._ \\- A.'-' -re. 1, (1 13 915969 Mc A rrR'ER\"'',foRAsA 13 2ll 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 4905 BALLINGER 14 916404 CARLTON ANDREA 2 II 2ll 375-9647 MEADOWCLIFF 207 EAST 27TH 15 915814 BROWN ANTOINE 2 1)-_ 2ll 376-1550 CLOVERDALE 221 EAST 28TH I I BOOKER 06 GRADE 00 I I SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 915959 BRILEY BRITTANY 1\" 211 225-5989 FAIR PARK I 12133 SOUTHRIDGE s 17 915970 MCCARTHER LARRY 1 211 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 4905 BALLINGER I 18 916430 REECE TIFFANY 2825 WELCH 2 /3 211 372-6124 WOODRUFF 19 916467 STANLEY ADRIAN 2 1v 211 374-8673 BADGETT 2116 BRAGG I, 20 916677 LAWHON RYAN 1 211 565-2193 MEADOW CLIFF 7319 DENISE 21 916679 KELLY CARL 215 211 568-0028 CLOVERDALE 2 SOMERTON APT 2 7 22 916701 HANSEN SUMER 1 211 663-6711 WILSON 1726 LILAC CIR \"'- ,,.,,,.\nI Wn'/T :\n:. I I BL--t4Ck. ,=. ,Z__, BOOKER 06 GRADE 01 I SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 9104 72 SHAW LAKISHA 2 I 376-1169 JEFFERSON 2012 WRIGHT 2 911054 GOODWIN CRYSTAL 1 374-0534 NOT ASSIGN 2123 SCOTT 3 911963 MITCHELL RANDALL 2\n}._ 663-0872 MEADOWCLIFF 1000 MAPLE 4 910481 BEASLEY AMOS 2 ') 371-9732 WAKEFIELD 1615 E 3RD 5 912198 WILLIAMS SHARONDA 2 '1 374-6819 BOOKER 1713 E 21ST :2-- 6 915184 JAMES JEREMY 1 227-0359 BRADY 5 BRADFORD .3 7 915660 LOWE MICHAEL 1 227-4137 NOT ASSIGN 1502 GREEN MTN APT 13 8 910733 WILLIAMS DERRICK 2s 568-1797 BASELINE 5413 VALLEY 9 910400 VAUGHN MARTINA 2\" 101 374-3183 DODD 1705 COMMERCE 10 913235 JACKSON DEANGLEA 7 2 101 666-6668 FOREST PARK 1804 S MARTIN ! 11 907615 DONLEY ANITA 2 101 663-2954 JEFFERSON 116 MONROE 12 910382 HUGHES CHI-RA 2' 101 375-2631 MEADOWCLIFF 1219 WELCH 13 910209 JOHNSON CRYSTAL 2 / 6 101 372-0388 MEADOWCLIFF 1419 COLLEGE ,, 14 910285 GRAGGS JASON 2 101 372-6406 MEADOWCLIFF 1400 E 38TH ST 15 ,\"' 915876 WILLIAMS RODERICK 2 101 664-2057 RIGHTS ELL 1417 S RINGO I I BOOKER 06 GRADE 01 I SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I ,s 16 908184 UMEH ESTHER 2 102 661-8088 MCDERMOTT I 3100 W 11TH ,,\n17 909558 ARMSTRONG RANDALL 2 102 375-0564 OTTER CREEK 2210 SUMMIT I 18 913922 ROBERTS TARSHA 2'$ 102 375-9856 MEADOWCLIFF 1504 HANGER ,~ 19 910775 WALKER KATRINA 2 102 374-0985 MEADOWCLIFF 1303 COLLEGE ,1 20 913376 HIGGINS TAMEKIA 2 102 376-1939 CLOVERDALE 2012 E 4TH 21 910191 JACOBS TAKAKO 2 ,s 103 374-9320 MABELVALE 1712 BROADWAY APT 3 22 915855 GOYNES HARLISHA 2 11 103 375-7832 MABELVALE 1007 CALHOUN 23 911619 HALL MICHAEL 2 ,, 103 375-5943 MABELVALE 2005 S STATE ,,J 24 914171 WILLIAMS CONSTANCE 2 103 374-1550 DODD 2020 BRAGG \"'v 25 913344 MONROE CHRISTOPHER 2 103 378-7907 WAKEFIELD 1100 BOUNDLESS ,,j 26 910770 THOMAS VERNON 2 104 375-5649 MABELVALE 1615 CHESTER APT 208 ,.:/ 27 909962 BOYKIN KRISTOPHER 2 104 374-6530 FOREST PARK 2324 W 11TH ST ~ 28 910318 JACKSON TANISHA 2 104 374-5570 CHICOT 2009 E 6TH 29 908381 \" )JJI BRILEY BENJAMIN 1 111 225-5989 FARI PARK 12133 SOUTHRIDGE 'Z,~ 30 911942 STANLEY KARIM 2 111 374-8673 BADGETT 2116 BRAGG BOOKER 06 GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ,-,1 31 910388 HUNTER EVAN 2 111 225-3327 BAKER 3519 SUSSEX ,., 32 908025 JOHNSON ARLENA 2 111 376-0245 BASELINE 45 KIRSPEL s 33 897421 FOWLER CHARLES 1 111 BASELINE 410 1/2 9TH .,, 34 910230 JONES PATRICE 2 111 888-6466 ROCKEFELLER 1 LENORA LN :\u0026gt; 35 910108 FORD MONIQUE 2 111 644-5188 FAIR PARK 4109 W 12TH 36 907901 AARON RICARDO 2 ,, 111 375-9841 MCDERMOTT 1521 EAST 15TH APT 4 ,.,,, 37 907209 JOHNSON STEFAN 2 111 374-2400 BRADY 116 S OAK\n\u0026gt; 38 897454 WASHINGTON BERRY 2 111 371-0571 FOREST PARK 2022 ROCK ~1 39 910733 WILLIAMS DERRICK 2 111 568-1797 BASELINE 5413 VALLEY 'Y 40 913173 MCCULLOUGH LUCHELLE 2 111 FAIR PARK 1300 SUMMIT APT 3 3~ 41 915749 THOMAS AMTROSHELL 2 111 375-7139 FOREST PARK 2414 W 13TH ST y 42 909985 BUCKLEY FELICIA 2 111 565-6166 WATSON 9307 OAK GROVE LN Jc 43 913307 CANE KAMETRA 2 111 375-4703 BAKER 3023 MARSHALL 37 44 910379 SAMUEL ALLEN 2 111 375-9563 FRANKLIN 603 CORNING f . 45 916738 WOODFIELD JESSIKA 1 111 663-8901 FAIR PARK 1413 S FAIR PARK BLVD BOOKER 06 GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 7 46 907210 KELLY MELISSA 1 112 562-2598 MEADOWCLIFF 17 BELMAR + 47 910637 MILLER MARY 2 112 568-1076 MABELVALE 10402 MILKYWAY ~J 48 911498 MAYS BRANDY 2 112 661-9072 PULASKI HGTS E 1815 JOHNSON 49 910848 STEWART LYNDSEY 2 'I\" 112 455-0565 DODD 4711 N TIMBERLAND DR ,13 50 910170 HARDIN OPIO 2 112 562-6974 WESTERN HILLS 32 LOBLOLLY 1/,/ 51 916766 OLIVER TIFFANY 2 203 376-3833 MABELVALE 2518 RINGO 52 916956 IM CHANG-HAN 6i 203 223-3119 ROMINE 1912 GREEN MTN DR APT 4 53 915610 ALESSI CHRISTINA 1' 204 225-7362 ROMINE 3503 HAPPY VALLEY ,o 54 916338 COLLIE WILLIAM 1 204 224-8038 MCDERMOTT 8 FLINTWOOD ,p 55 907727 STUBBLEFIELD GARY 2 204 376-0853 MABELVALE 2323 ROCK ST 56 916781 LOFTIS KIMBERLY 1'' 204 228-0964 FRANKLIN 4710 SAM PECK APT 1171 57 915262 HAMPTON HAROLD 112- 211 227-7416 FULBRIGHT 12823 ST CHARLES BLVD 58 916055 BISHOP MICHAEL 1 13 211 374-9102 ROCKEFELLER 803 ROCK APT 10 -1\" 59 91 6887 RAGSTON NATOSCHA 2 211 376-0858 ROCKEFELLER 923 W 24TH BLr9Ck. - :2_\nl!TE :\n. I SEQ# STUDENT 1 894479 2 895040 3 894837 4 890365 I 5 892233 6 891703 7 896143 I 8 893210 I 9 895207 10 896768 11 894299 12 894745 I 13 896444 14 894414 15 896326 # BOOKER 06 GRADE 02 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL CAREY CHARLES 2 372-5787 WILLIAMS 420 W 31ST y' KING CHELLA 2 372-4292 PULASKI HGTS E 1614 W 20TH ~ SHELTON TOSHUA 2 372-1632 WILSON 908 BEDFORD ABAEKOBE SANDRA 2 \" 661-9835 CHICOT 2620 E CAPITOL s PENNINGTON SHAVONNE 2 MCDERMOTT 64 MONROE \u0026gt;- MARBLEY NINA 2 375-5312 MEADOWCLIFF 2609 WELCH 1 RUMPH CYNTHIA 2 666-4857 FAIR PARK 3302 LAMAR f ALFORD LASHEA 2 ROCKEFELLER 409 E 17TH 'i TAYLOR CHRISTOPHER 2 771-1847 FOREST PARK 1923 W 16TH /6 BLACK LOUIS 2 897-4038 MCDERMOTT 13202 QUAIL BEND CROSS AKINA 1 565-3909 BALE 7100 TALMAGE ,1.. BUZBEE JOHN 1 224-4628 GIBBS 2 HEARTHSIDE ,, THOMAS MELISSA 2 372-5747 BALE 5019 W 28TH ,,,, BEASLEY KELVIN 2 MEADOWCLIFF 1610 BOYCE I.? WASHINGTON JANELLE 2 663-1675 BALE 1620 SPINE I BOOKER 06 GRADE 02 ~ SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 3 16 909674 WARG TRISTAN 1 568-0735 MABELVALE 8510 COULTER LN ,.,, 17 914512 CLAY KENDRICK 2 375-6411 NOT ASSIGN 2723 CUMBERLAND 'I 18 916292 } 1 TRAN TRUNG 1 223-0956 ROMINE  10 LARIAT CT ( 19 907152 ~ FARNAM JESSICA 1 225-1835 ROMINE 401 GAMBLE ' 95 - - d 20 915180 WEST RACHEL 1 221-0453 BRADY 1912 GREEN MTN DR ,s- 21 896585 FLOWERS DIONDRA 2 101 374-2759 MABELVALE 1323 WRIGHT AVE APT 314 7 22 907475 J MCLAUGHLIN JASON 1 101 565-0267 WILSON 3800 STANNUS J\u0026lt; 23 894454 KILLINGSWORTH BRANDEN 2 101 372-7728 DODD 1901 BRAGG 17 24 895846 STAGGERS ANDRE 2 101 664-8058 DODD 4305 27TH 1i 25 897326 TURNER TINISHA 2 I 101 374-3604 BASELINE 3706 AMERICAN MANOR APT 1 26 902266 MIGNONE LINDSEY 1' 101 ROCKEFELLER 11222 KANIS 11 27 897763 HARRIS TRESTON 2 101 MEADOWCLIFF 17051 1/2 BOYCE 2,0 28 895127 HUDSON TERRENCE 2 101 376-9674 MEADOWCLIFF 1225 GEYER APT 614 11J 29 895228 MAHLER SAMANTHA 1 101 228-0192 ROMINE 11701 MARA LYNN NW HILLS 30 896529 MANYLATH SAKOUNKEO 6 101 664-7152 KING 2524 SOUTH BROWN I BOOKER 06 GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ,,, 31 914901 HENRY CHRISTOPHER 2 101 562-7170 GEYER SPGS 7714 MOORE RD .,,v 32 896625 YOUNG KELLY 2 101 223-9084 TERRY 9116 WEST 35TH II 33 908048 COLLIER MELANIE 1 102 374-6791 ROCKEFELLER 907 CORNING AVE ,,  34 894698 BURL WILLIAM 2 102 664-4628 DODD 4106 W 25TH ,,j 35 893584 BRADLEY TERESA 2 102 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE 1,$ 36 896352 GAY NEFERTAR 2 102 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PL 7,I. 37 897271 RAWLS MATTHEW 2 103 663-2579 JEFFERSON 4807 W 22ND ,z,I 38 894504 DIXON ALICIA 2 103 DODD 2718 S COMMERCE ,, 39 893354 JOHNSON DAWON 2 103 666-9203 FRANKLIN 1403 S VAN BUREN .. 1 40 894530 FOWLER KAWUN 2 103 375-9255 DODD 1314 W 15TH 12. 41 897420 FOCHT IDA 1 103 371-0256 ROCKEFELLER 2022 CENTER 3 0 42 914875 BOYCE ANAIAH 2 104 565-4837 CLOVERDALE 2 SOUTHAVEN CT 4 'JI 43 891404 MURRY ANTONIO 2 104 375-5491 DODD 503 E 20TH J'V 44 904061 STEWART KIMBERLY 2 111 490-1763 BADGETT 6 PICKETT ~~ 45 894470 WEST ROY 2 111 374-6929 WOODRUFF 1410 E 38TH BOOKER 06 GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ,. 46 910406 SHAW SUMMER 1 111 BADGETT 1900 HAVEN RD ~~ 47 898554 BROWN ANTOIN 2 111 565-5734 GEYER SPGS 85 LANCASTER RD ,,, 48 907187 ,. t}I NEWKIRK KIMBERLY 1 111 562-5919 CLOVERDALE 4 ALTHEA CR ,.: 49 164598 RYAN ROLISA 2 111 376-1550 CLOVERDALE 221 E 28TH ,\" 50 895178 HUNTER HAROLD 2 111 225-3327 BAKER 3519 SUSSEX CR\n? 51 896834 WILLIAMS ELIZABETH 2 111 228-9787 JEFFERSON 1700 SANFORD APT 1 31 52 913644 WILLIAMS GREGORY 2 111 372-7917 JEFFERSON 217 S ELM ST APT 2\n1 53 912550 JONES BABE 2 111 371-0350 WAKEFIELD 816 ROGERS AVE # 54 894480 CARTER CHRISTIAN 2 111 376-1481 WASHINGTON 1500 GEYER 111 55 891375 STOKES ANNDREA 2 111 378-0349 JEFFERSON 2507 W 13TH JS' 56 915180 WEST RACHEL 1 111 221-0453 BRADY 1912 GREEN MTN DR APT 34 57 895171 HARRIS DENNIS 2 ~v 111 227-5971 TERRY 12 LABETTE CT I(, 58 911099 WYERS MARK 1 111 374-3066 RIGHTS ELL 1614 CUMBERLAND 59 896807 MICKENS JAMES 2 ~~ 111 224-8220 MCDERMOTT 4 WOODWIND DR 17 60 903938 SOUCY DERRICA 1 111 224-2474 FULBRIGHT 1614 PICKERING DR BOOKER 06 GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 61 890258 THOMPSON SHANEKA 2 *4 111 565-1356 GEYER SPGS 3124 BOYD 62 167939 NICHOLS LAWRENCE 2.p 111 565-7353 CLOVERDALE 5300 BASELINE RD APT 32D 63 896302 MARTIN SHENEKA 2 l/1,, 111 376-3011 FULBRIGHT 1917 MAIN 64 896417 HARRIS MISTY 2 ~7 111 374-8844 MABELVALE 1503 WOLFE .,\u0026amp; 65 895017 SAMUEL NATASHA 2 111 375-9563 FRANKLIN 38 KIRSPEL PL .f-t 66 890225 SURRATT STEPHANIE 2 111 372-1286 ROCKEFELLER 1205 GEYER 67 896326 WASHINGTON JANELLE 2 5\" 111 663-1675 BALE 1620 SPINE s' 68 895152 DOZIER CRYSTAL 2 112 664-1298 FOREST PARK 2201 STYLER 69 $ 897309 BROWN JUSTIN 2 112 378-7816 MITCHELL 1707 S CHESTER APT 115\n3 70 894410 HILL JASON 2 112 374-1559 CARVER 1909 SCHILLER s 'i 71 894411 REED LASHARON 2 112 376-8934 FAIR PARK 56 HIGHLAND CT s:s 72 908777 BALLARD GARY 2 112 490-2848 BADGETT 9 SHELBY CR 5fo 73 902303 MILLER TASHA 2 112 565-0434 MABELVALE 4320 PINECONE DR ,t 74 896830 C STEEN JEB 1 113 225-5615 MCDERMOTT (1 9705 OVERBY CT ,: } 75 896406 BRANCH JULIAN 2 113 376-2714 CHICOT 2901 IZARD BOOKER 02 GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL st 76 913640 SMITH SIDNEY 2 113 374-1894 BADGETT 2925 S CHESTER 51 77 895190 LEWIS ARTENIS 2 113 227-4883 ROMINE 2022 ROMINE i6 78 894520 JOHNINSON MATTHEW 2 113 374-1064 FULBRIGHT 1915 MARYLAND ,1 79 896028 BUTLER WHITNEY 1 113 225-2225 FRANKLIN 13510 BECKENHAM DR :0 80 915822 RAYBON PAMELA 1 201 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRELL APT H2 81 915251 GARBETT JENNIFER 1 l' 201 565-6049 ROMINE 6013 FORESTVIEW RD 82 915763 MARBLEY QUANTRELL 2 \"' 201 375-3986 DODD 1812 S VANCE 2, 'l/ 83 916858 BRADSHAW MELISSA 1 212 565-4825 CHICOT 5804 VALLEY DR APT 2 I /3Ll?CI{ \"' .z., w11-1rE =o- I BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 890178 MCNUTT ANTIONETTE 2 372-3444 WILSON 7824 PARKWOOD / 2 166728 ROGERS KIMBERLY 1 375-2151 NOT ASSIGN 2618 BARBER .,,. 3 170294 MOSS NATRASHA 2 371-9271 MABELVALE 2719 CROSS ..I 4 907103 WARD INAS 2 375-0433 MITCHELL 2301 BATTERY 5 890320 PIGGEE RAYDIA 2 \" 374-5350 MABELVALE 1406 STATE s' 6 167067 SCOTT KIM 2 374-1733 CHICOT 5 SELMA PL 7 893553 BELL MADELLA 2 \"' 225-5927 PULASKI HGTS E 9600 W 36TH 8 890258 THOMPSON SHANEKA 2 565-1356 GEYER SPGS 3124 BOYD 1 9 890259 TURNER MIZZ 2 565-4513 CHICOT 17 DEE CT s 10 891675 MORRIS TAMIKA 2 375-8764 NOT ASSIGN 2800 CONFEDRATE 11 890342 /. RASES MARY 2- 1 663-9278 NOT ASSIGN 5720 N COUNTRY CLUB /0 12 892115 HOBBS CLARENCE 2 375-6200 GIBBS 1207 S SPRING 13 891811 MITCHELL TRENA 2 \" 376-2563 BRADY 1515 W 20TH , .... 14 890238 GREEN KEISHA 2 375-7324 DODD 1800 VANCE 15 904934 WILLIAMS LAKEISHA 2 ,, 661-1662 GARLAND 3607 W 26 BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT# NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 898192 ).,_, BELL ERIC 2 /V 490-0681 NOT ASSIGN 4709 E 39TH 15\" 17 890301 BELCHER JOYCELYN 2 666-5634 FOREST PARK 1913 S VALENTINE ,, 18 907137 WILLIS RAMONA 2 6641342 WAKEFIELD 6 GUARDIAN CT 17 19 167310 ROBERTSON MICHAEL 2 374-9615 GEYER SPGS 315 E 21ST 1? 20 896416 GREGORY RAVEN 2 374-4670 CARVER 2815 CROSS 3 21 891425 ADAMS DAVID 1 666-9148 ROCKEFELLER 605 E 16TH 11 22 892193 CARTER KAMILAH 2 666-7467 FRANKLIN 1908 S TAYLOR ,J 23 170505 SHERRILL ANGELA 1 562-6686 MEADOWCLIFF 7420 DENISE 24 GOMEZ GAIDA 227-4389 NOT ASSIGN ' .,_o 25 165381 GREENWOOD DAVID 2 374-8426 BADGETT 917 PICRON 26 896050 fl', REAGAN GABRIEL 5' 1 225-9363 FULBRIGHT 2111 HINSON J ~ .-0,,,id_.ol\" (, 27 YSIEGLE RESA 1 455-1131 NOT ASSIGN 28 891110 DAVIS CARLOS ,,,, 2 101 376-4021 OTTER CREEK 3106 LOUISANA .,,v 29 911986 JUNIEL ANNETTE 2 101 371-0571 DODD 322 E 21ST ,,? 30 164330 SMITH JARED 2 101 372-3871 DODD 1801 BRAGG BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL\nv 31 911809 HAMETH PETRICA 2 101 372-4740 MABELVALE 2513 BROADWAY 32 909467 POUND JUMAYLIA 2 p 101 MABELVALE 2001 MAIN ST APT 12 7 ., 33 910659 J9-sl CASS SHAWN 1 101 664-2031 KING 6900 CANTRELL APT Gll ( \" ,i\n/'~ I' V 34 910346 MARLATT RYAN 1 101 227-9814 OOMHffi-- 12500 VALLEYWOOD -\n,'- 35 890376 JOHNSON CALVIN 2 101 568-0366 DODD 5611 OLD HICKORY 36 914903 HENRY KAMISHA 2 2, l 101 562-7170 GEYER SPGS 7714 MOORE ?,'l 37 890455 GAY KEONA 2 102 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL ,, 1 38 890223 WALKER ANIKA 2 102 374-0985 MEADOWCLIFF 1303 COLLEGE .30 39 164522 MARION KEITH 2 102 374-4702 CHICOT 2616 IZARD 40 892648 JACKSON RICHARD 2 3/ 102 375-6227 MABELVALE 3316 BATTERY , v 41 893579 BRADLEY TRAMAYNE 2 102 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE 42 166104 HARRIS DAMION 2 33 102 666-6668 PULASKI HGTS E 1804 S MARTIN , 43 907242 { o) GLENN RENEE 1 102 565-2437 MEADOWCLI FF 19 ARDMORE , /I 44 911100 YOUNG PAUL 2 102 376-4324 MABELVALE 2612 BISHOP BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 35 46 168123 MARSHALL KAVIN 2 103 664-6871 MCDERMOTT 1404 S VAN BUREN 47 163027 LEE EDMUND 2 Jb 103 663-2579 JEFFERSON 4807 W 22ND 37 48 893570 TAYLOR SANTRIMEKE 2 103 374-1550 DODD 2020 BRAGG ~1 49 164599 PARKER KIANA 2 103 OTTER CREEK 3101 CENTER ,., 50 892188 HALL SHANNON 2 103 663-0419 MABELVALE 2005 STATE 51 890152 HUGHES BRANDON 2 tjO 103 WILSON 2319 W 12TH JI/ 52 155163 SALAAM AHMAD 2 104 375-0806 MCDERMOTT 2309 W 13TH 53 890465 KELLEY MAURICE 2 1/-Z-- 104 372-3724 CHICOT 36 E KRISPEL 54 892999 HUDSON ALBERT 2 '/3 104 664-5852 DODD 4116 W 22ND /0 55 915012 -\" STOGNER AMY 1 111 562-4834 WAKEFIELD 1 DAVEN CT I\n56 890394 BLAND EBONY 2\"' 111 WOODRUFF 1404 E 38TH 57 892477 NORWOOD WILLIAM 2-t..J 111 376-1561 ISH 3209 RINGO 58 913503 SMITH MARWAN L. 'J\u0026amp; 111 376-6627 FAIR PARK 1225 GEYER APT 610 59 159818 GRANT HORRACE 2 ,J 111 661-9637 BALE 4805 W 29TH ,, 61 898883 CARWILE CHANTELE 1 111 RIGHTSELL 2100 RINGO BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL (V 61 893217 CHAMBERS JOSHUA 1 111 562-2113 WILSON 3716 KATHERINE  I 62 164310 WASHINGTON TAMELA 2\n, 111 371-0571 FOREST PARK 2022 ROCK 63 892794 ROBINSON RICKELA 2 111 375-3898 ROMINE 9600 W 36TH APT 407 13 64 904998 WILSON REBEKAH 1 111 562-6212 WATSON (I 1  6 CAYLOR LN 65 890301 BELCHER JOYCELYN 2  111 666-5634 FOREST PARK 1913 S VALENTINE 66 165789 PRATER DESHUN 2 111 565-8066 WESTERN HILLS 4202 GILMAN 67 911191 BROWN CRYSTAL 2 111 376-1550 CLOVERDALE 221 E 28TH 68 908864 NEAL NIGEL 2 111 568-8792 CHICOT 9501 WILDERNESS APT 82 69 165381 GREENWOOD DANIEL 2 111 374-8426 BADGETT 917 PICRON ,r 70 899954 FOWLER ANTHONY 1 111 BADGETT 2801 LOMA DR -~ 71 155191 HARRIS MICHAEL 2 111 372-0525 BALE 2906 S TAYLOR 72 890121 PALMER DEMETRUS 2~ ~ 111 666-2629 KING 4813 W 23RD ~ 73 896847 i MUELLER PIPER 1 111 225-7391 MCDERMOTT 11 LUDINGTON COVE 74 898616 BROWN TONY 2 ~l 111 565-5734 GEYER SPGS 85 LANCASTER BOOKER 06 GRADE 03 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 76 904105 KELLY KARDRA 2 112 568-0028 CLOVERDALE 2 SOMERTON CT APT 2 ,t,. 77 891928 KELLY CHARLEY 1 112 ...e2 2s9s- MEADOWCLIFF 17 BELMAR '163-JMla 78 164353 MURRY JERAMIE 2  112 375-5491 CLOVERDALE 503 E 20TH ST 79  915856 GILLMORE CARLOS 2 112 MABELVALE 909 WELCH 80 903682 SHAVERS SHUNDA 2 112 490-0398 BADGETT 4 ROSE MEADOWS PL . ' - 81 893008 HARRIS DANELLE 2 112 374-0962 ROCKEFELLER 2001 MAIN ST ~, 82 891824 BREWER GEORGE 2 112 490-1228 BADGETT 2003 E 5TH 17 83 916834 CASSEL JASMINE 1 112 FRANKLIN 2002 SCOTTY CT 84 913494 FORD DERAN 2 113 565-2939 CLOVERDALE 4 2 S WAKEFIELD 85 890346 WESLEY KEVIN 2 113 225-4854 GEYER SPGS 3223 SUMMIT 86 890961 GARRISON TERRENCE 2 113 374-2901 MEADOWCLIFF 1322 ROCK APT A ,r 87 896033 ADAMS DESMOND 1 113 224-2628 BRADY fY 3 PERDIDO 0 88 890308 FLEMING ELIZABETH 1 ,r 113 661-1758 FOREST PARK 5405 SHERWOOD 89 892412 MARBLEY SHAMIKA 2 201 375-3986 DODD 1812 S VANCE ,.,., 90 915461 FREDRICK KELLY 1 201 224-0159 NOT ASSIGN 38 INVERNESS I - I SEQ # 91 92 93 94 STUDENT # 915869 896050 916875 909846 BOOKER 06 NAME AND ADDRESS SMITH SHAQUITA 1306 LOUISANA ~ REAGAN GABRIEL ~ 2111 HINSON APT 16 THURMAN TODD 1875 A GLICK PL TORRES HARRY 2600 S STATE GRADE 03 RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ,. 2 201 WESTERN HILLS zJ 1 211 225-9363 FULBRIGHT '.).2,, 1 211 FULBRIGHT\n.' 1 212 376-6527 BASELINE = I = 2-, BOOKER 06 GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ., 1 162324 BELCHER CLIFTON 2 666-5634 FOREST PARK 1913 S VALENTINE ::\n_ 2 160431 WOODS LAKESHIA 2 375-9062 NOT ASSIGN 2721 BARBER 7 3 164323 BIVENS RONNIESHA 2 224-5503 MCDERMOTT 2706 TATUM 4 900883 HOWARD ARCHIE 2j/ NOT ASSIGN 2705 MARSHALL S' 5 163888 PORTER EBONY 2 374-4581 WATSON 1924 SCHILLER ~ 6 891714 ROUSSE MARQUIS 2 NOT ASSIGN 1515 W 20TH .,, 7 167014 PEARSON THURLO 2 374-6839 CHICOT 2823 STATE y 8 167293 LOGAN LATISHA 2 374-9975 PULASKI HGTS E 1600 S CEDAR , 9 891478 RANDALL RICKY 2 NOT ASSIGN 7 SELMA 10 167955 BECTON AMANDA 2 'O 374-0908 GIBBS 108 THAYER 11 /, 167697 MITCHELL SHARANDA 2 663-0872 MEADOWCLIFF 1000 MAPLE /2-- 12 891463 BEASLEY RICK 2 NOT ASSIGN 1615 E 3RD 13 893060 CLINKSCALE AUDREY /3 2 374-4260 MCDERMOTT 3519 CROSS 14 892333 JORDAN TWYLA l 'Y 224-6554 MEADOWCLIFF 9600 W 36TH ,\u0026lt;5 15 162344 NAGEL ALLISON 2 666-0060 FOREST PARK 5411 CENTERWOOD BOOKER 06 GRADE 04 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I 16 911956 ROTHBERG SHIRA 1 NOT ASSIGN 2700 N GRANT 2. 17 913610 9 ROSS SAMUEL 1 664-8225 PULASKI HGTS E 2185 VALENTINE 18 163906 CLAY KESHAN 2/? 374-5618 RIGHSELL 1860 RINGO 3 19 916338 ri COLLIE WILL 1 224-8038 MCDERMOTT 8 FLINTWOOD II 20 893776 ANDERSON MISTY 2 / 7 101 375-7931 BADGETT 3721 HIGHLAND 21 166685 TOLLY THERESA I 101 ~ ,C l\\CJ .,-t\" 565-3891 MABELVALE 9407 WOODFORD 22 167113 POINTER CRYSTELL 2// 101 664-4410 BALE 1409 MAPLE 23 159551 DAVIS PHYLLIS / 1 101 374-8636 DODD 2223 COMMERCE ,,,. 24 915289 DAVIS TAMEKA 2 101 562-9402 WAKEFIELD 6119 BUTLER RD APT Dl3 ,,_\n25 160021 HUGHES KHOMEINI 2 101 375-2631 MEADOWCLIFF 1219 WELCH S' 26 165515 MARKS BRADFORD 1 101 227-6586 MCDERMOTT 8116 ALVIN LN .,_v 27 160384 COOLEY TONIA 2 101 372-0908 DODD 619 E 22ND -p-3 28 153397 HARRIS JANICE 2 101 663-2954 MCDERMOTT 116 S MONROE -i/ 29 161019 GRAY SALONICA 2 101 663-9672 PULASKI HGTS E 3918 W 11TH 30 902572 NASH JONATHAN 1\" ' 101 562-7573 WAKEFIELD 12 ROSEMOOR BOOKER 06 GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 7? 31 160017 ROBINSON LAMONT 2 101 227-5927 TERRY 32 DARTMOUTH DR ,,I- 32 914902 BRADLEY SHEMEKA 2 101 562-7170 CHICOT 7714 MOORE -\n7 33 156961 GAY NICHOLE 2 102 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KISPEL .,,1 34 163178 DUNN BROOKE 2 102 562-2290 MEADOW CLIFF 7 LAMONT -,.1 11 35 167506 FORD DARIAN 2 102 375-6227 MABELVALE 3316 BATTERY 7 36 907345 ~ GLENN ANDREA 1 102 565-2437 MEADOWCLIFF 19 ARDMORE y 37 167700 MORRISON RICHARD 2 102 374-8623 CHICOT 1115 CALHOUN JI 38 153992 SHAVIS BRODERICK 2 102 375-4342 ROCKEFELLER 1315 COLLEGE 3-Y 39 164416 BORKINS NECOLE 2 102 378-7800 MEADOWCLIFF 1717 E 21ST J3 40 167110 GAY TAMEIKA 2 102 372-4848 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL 31 41 163886 BRADLEY TANESHA 2 102 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE DR JS 42 156962 GAY TINA 2 102 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL J \" 43 153976 SWINTON SHAUNTAE 2 103 372-3306 OTTER CREEK 2924 LOUISANA 3 7 44 914874 BOYCE CECIL 2 104 565-4837 CLOVERDALE 2 SOUTHAVEN CT APT 4 - :JI' 45 166401 HUNTER ANDREA 2 111 225-5321 BAKER 3519 SUSSEX CR -  BOOKER 06 GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL\n:, 46 167084 SCOTT JAMES 2 111 375-3796 BADGETT 912 S BEDFORD .,., 47 898960 CHEFFEN KATINA 2 111 562-1393 DODD 5 TIMBER VALLEY ,\n/ 48 161542 WATSON ERIC 2 111 375-5182 JEFFERSON 2415 W 16 (' 49 904826 WILBANKS JULIE 1 111 562-3296 CLOVERDALE 3 SOUTHERN OAKS V2-- 50 891797 GREENWOOD DERRICK 2 111 374-8426 BADGETT 917 PICRON y3 51 166670 HARRIS PHILLIP 2 111 372-0525 BALE 2906 TAYLOR t 52 899948 FOSTER NATHANIEL 1 111 568-2502 MEADOWCLIFF 4 ROSEMOOR yV 53 165735 RIDOUT JALONDA 2 111 224-1618 TERRY 9410 LABETTE s\u0026lt;S 54 907447 FONEY KANESHIA 2 111 372-7917 JEFFERSON 217 S ELM APT 2 y,: 55 163875 STRAIN LATOYA 2 111 663-7810 KING 2523 SPINE / d 56 910004 GANNADY LAURA 1 111 224-0733 TERRY 1502 GREEN MTN APT 111 57 896557 BASS LATASHA 2 YI 111 562-0260 WILSON 3104 LOUISANA ,,,r 58 892000 MATTHEWS FABIAN 2 111 372-4188 MABELVALE 2202 BRAGG I I/ 59 911191 ~.,, :t:1,OORE PAULA 1 111 562-2869 BALE I .J\\\".g STONECREST v? 60 164219 JOHNSON CORNELIUS 2 111 664-9045 FAIR PARK 22 PINEHILL TERRACE I I I I I I BOOKER 06 GRADE 04 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ,0uLBRIGHT JOHN I Z. 61 163452 1 111 562-6935 WESTERN HILLS I 103 GREENLAND CV ,j\"6 62 166940 WATSON KEVIN 2 111 375-5182 JEFFERSON 2415 W 16TH ,5'/ 63 160349 WILSON PERRY 2 111 372-4436 PULASKI HGTS E 2123 BRAGG :,Y 64 167290 SMITH KANGELITA 2 111 375-4703 BAKER 3023 MARSHALL s.J I 65 168878 PERRY KIMSON 2 112 372-1298 RIGHTS ELL 2121 S IZARD APT 2 13 66 899388 DAVIS TAMMY 1 112 375-1942 FAIR PARK 100 RICE ST APT 1 .::-, 67 166919 BROWN DIONNE 2 112 224-8025 FULBRIGHT I 2522 ECHO VALLEY 1 )1 68 165807 LAVENDER LILAC 1 112 374-2811 FRANKLIN 223 RICE I /t{ 69 900505 MARKINS ASHLEY 1 112 562-8569 MEADOWCLIFF 5815 FREELAND ss I 70 159220 ROBINSON TASHARA 2 112 374-5815 ROCKFELLER 1919 W 38TH J I, 71 891946 MCCOY KIA 2 112 666-6677 GIBBS I 3904 W 27TH Cl 72 165674 LEWIS ANDRE 2 113 227-0741 ROMINE 2022 ROMINE / ~ 73 163177 PENDLETON DANIEL 1 113 562-2558 MEADOW CLIFF 44 SHERATON 74 910680 WILFORD RACHEL 2 a 113 565-1979 WESTERN HILLS 18 LAKESIDE / / I 75 915821 RAYBON JULIE 1 201 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRELL APT H2 S\\ \\ --, --,,u 0. c\\\\, ,~ \\,.),\\' I ~ ) J t ....... ' ' ' ''\\f''C\\ 1  '-, '\\,,~ '\\\n::,E \\ \\\\\\ t:'\\ CJ, '\\ \\  '\\\\.  ,\\ \\,,)ca~ I I I I I I I SEQ# 76 77 STUDENT # 915254 909835 ..i BOOKER 06 NAME AND ADDRESS HAMPTON SCOTT 12823 ST CHARLES BLVD ORRES LUIS 2600 STATE GRADE 04 RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I! 1 211 227-7416 FULBRIGHT 19 1 212 376-6527 BASELINE I /3LA('_f\u0026lt;.. == p(_ \u0026amp;)\n-f1T :=. j SEQ # STUDENT 1 907233 2 892538 3 157120 4 157082 I 5 153775 6 161661 I 7 158349 I 8 89 6877 9 157075 I] 10 161677 11 892378 I 12 159643 13 904933 14 905250 I 15 167133 I I I BOOKER 06 # NAME AND ADDRESS WALKER MICHAEL 2008 MADISON PACE CHAVELIA 2509 BISHOP LOVELACE DETRA 2814 BARBER STEWART KENDRA 822 E 24TH RINEY TUTREA 2316 GUNPOWDER HOLMES YASHEKA 2504 MAPLE NEIDHARDT JASON 26 HUNTINGTON SCOTT DECTRICK 4204 W 2ND PRICE BRYAN 2717 BARBER FLOYD CAROLYN 812 ABIGAIL WARREN LATOSHA 1421 CHESTER GULLEY DEMETRIOS 1604 IZARD WILLIAMS LAKEISHA 8501 DREHER Kl I ~ WILSON RACHEL p\u0026lt;{ 1080l BIRCHWOOD PATTERSON CHRISTOPHER 711 S MAPLE GRADE 05 RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 2 664-7414 NOT ASSIGN .,_ 2 374-1230 CLOVERDALE j' 2 376-7289 CHICOT !' 2 374-2572 MEADOWCLIFF S' 2 224-3341 MCDERMOTT t 2 661-0929 BRADY I 1 227-5954 GIBBS 7 2 374-4720 WESTERN HILLS I 2 376-8226 CHICOT '1 2 663-8188 JEFFERSON 2'0 376-4709 WAKEFIELD I/ 2 376-2863 MITCHELL 2/l, 562-4467 OTTER CREEK 1.:2- NOT ASSIGN 13 2 666-5713 PULASKI HGTS E I I I BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL .J 16 900146 MEADOWS BRAIN 1 MITCHELL 7613 DENISE ,J- 17 152344 BEASLEY CARL 1 WAKEFIELD 1615 E 3RD ,v 18 167484 SMITH JOHNNY 2 224-4249 TERRY 11214 MESA APT El2 s 19 912850 VINSON ASHELY 1 224-8624 NOT ASSIGN 11810 PLEASANT RIDGE APT 1402 l, ,t\u0026gt; 20 161610 BURDEN MATTHEW 1 221-2577 NOT ASSIGN 5 KESWICK CV 21 893272 LYONS ANTHONY 2'6 372-3304 PULASKI HGTS E 615 W 13TH ST 22 905054 WOODBURY FELICIA 2 l\u0026lt;c 562-5597 BASELINE 9500 S HEIGHTS APT 187 7 1 23 VANTEYCH TUESDAY 1 664-5208 NOT ASSIGN r 24 161965 CROOM JAMES 1 FAIR PARK 1610 N HARRISON 25 152382 SIMMONS TAMMY 17 2 CHICOT 2818 BARBER 26 ILOGHI CHRISTINE 2\nf 374-1482 NOT ASSIGN 27 913686 CRANE KATHERINE 1' 664-8387 PULASKI HGTS E 6505 CANTRELL 28 /0 ... 911824 BROWN BRANDY 1 221-3765 NOT ASSIGN 9201 KANIS APT 1-D II 29 914531 MANUEL TIMOTHY 1 455-5008 DODD 6711 HONEYSUCKLE 30 914450 JOHNSON NICOLE 2 I'/ 375-6411 NOT ASSIGN 2723 CUMBERLAND BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 20 31 913667 IRBY JAMAR 2 562-1817 CARVER 8419 BASELINE APT 50 -u 32 160904 COLLIER KARY 2 663-4055 WOODRUFF 3519 MARYLAND ,,, 3 3 162126 MARKS DEREK ,2 1 101 227-6586 FRANKLIN 8116 ALVIN LN ,:v 34 153931 EVERHART RONALD 2 101 376-1550 MABELVALE 221 E 28TH ~ 35 159444 WASHINGTON TASHIA 2 101 378-0079 DODD 322 E 21ST z.\u0026lt;I 36 903515 RUTH CHRIS 2 101 568-0385 BASELINE 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON -z\u0026gt; 37 161712 STAGGERS ANDREA 2 101 666-7782 DODD 2600 SOAK -z.\" 38 904170 SWIGGINS STACIE 2 101 568-0768 WAKEFIELD 9800 SUNSET LANE\n.3 39 160942 YOUNG CASEY 1 101 562-8954 WOODRUFF 25 GLENDALE 40 156007 ROBINSON WILLIE -zJ 2 101 227-5927 TERRY 32 DARTMOUTH DR -z r 41 153983 BARNES GREGORY 2 101 372-2808 DODD 600 E 22ND 42 167095 TIDWELL DOMINIC 2 1.-'J 101 374-4091 MABELVALE I 1708 IZARD APT 114 43 .JD 156861 ROUNSVILLE LEVAR 2 101 375-6667 CHICOT 814 MAXWELL I 44 165325 SMITH KEVAN JI 2 102 377-3613 DODD 916 W 16TH APT 305 I J l  45 157339 ARMSTRONG ALEXA 2 102 375-2649 OTTER CREEK 2210 S SUMMIT I I I I I I BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 I SEO# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 33 46 160998 UMEH ERNEST 2 102 661-1740 MCDERMOTT I 3100 WEST 11TH 3'1 47 161700 MCBRIDE MAKESHA 2 102 227-9242 JEFFERSON I 9518 DARTMOUNT 48 163127 BURL SHANDRAIL 2\"35 102 DODD 4106 W 25TH I :5' 49 1614 77 STEWART TARYN 2 102 225-6033 FULBRIGHT 11220 BRAINBRIDGE 11- I a, 50 907372 SHANNON GLENN 1 102 565-2437 MEADOWCLIFF 19 ARDMORE ,.s 51 902440 MOORMAN MARCI 1 102 568-1792 CHICOT I 7709 CLAYBROOK J7 52 911101 YOUNG SHANNON 2 102 376-4324 MABELVALE I 2612 BISHOP 53 FLOWERS JAMES 31 156629 2 103 CHICOT 716 FOLSOM I 54 898224 BENNETT SHAUN 237 103 568-0702 CLOVERDALE 5504 DREHER ,, ,-. 55 901123 JOHNSON CAITLIN 1 103 376-3021 FULBRIGHT 5 FOREST MAPLE CT I/~ 56 156975 WILLIAMS NAKILLE 2 103 375-5169 CHICOT 35 HOLLINGSWORTH 57 159090 SMITH WHITNEY -fl 103 227-6331 ROMINE I 10005 KANE 58 1/ 161394 BULLOCK KERRIE 2 103 375-5943 DODD 2005 STATE I 59 903325 RIDDLING DIXIE 1'' 104 BADGETT 3012 RICHLAND I 60 PASHA ZARIFA fv 160241 2 104 374-5570 MEADOWCLIFF 2009 E 6TH I I ' BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 SEQ # STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL ~3 61 155740 ROSBY EBONY 2 111 372-4456 PULASKI HGTS 3107 BISHOP 62 161710 SIMMONS TAMARA 2 vr 111 565-2360 BALE 19 HATFIELD 11 63 901938 MARLIN LAURA 1 111 2~2292 FULBRIGHT 17 POWDERHORN CT ~ 64 167917 HOOD SHAMIONKA, 2 111 BADGETT 5420 E ROOSEVELT 'll 65 897694 WALKER CORY 2 111 375-6082 MABELVALE 1212 W 37TH ST 2.0 66 908926 MOGSTAD GRETCHEN 1 111 225-0241 BRADY 5 TIMBER PARK 67 157055 HODGES SUNTAYE 2 '(] 111 375-7139 FOREST PARK 2414 W 13 68 155961 ANDERSON DERRICK 2 '{( 111 661-1499 OTTER CREEK 1523 ADAM 69 161538 WATSON NELSON 2 'I? 111 375-5182 JEFFERSON 2415 W 16 70 161689 GRAY CHASSIDY 2~ 111 563-3178 BALE 2115 SOAK .5/ 71 160929 BUSH CAMERON 2 111 565-2358 WAKEFIELD 35 SHEFFIELD 72 892341 CARTER BRANDON 2 S\" \u0026gt;- 111 376-1481 WASHINGTON 1500 GEYER :i.l 73 912659 ELDER JESSICA 1 111 664-7128 KING 2918 W 26TH 74 904997 WILSON RACHEL l'2. 1 111 562-6212 WATSON 6 CAYLOR LN 75 ,n 161385 RAMEY KENNETH 2 111 375-0582 FULBRIGHT 1418 WOLFE BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL :rl/ 76 154372 VAULT NATASHA 2 111 490-0661 ROCKEFELLER 1 TALESMAN PL tS 77 160923 NICHOLS NIKKI 2 111 565-7353 CLOVERDALE 5300 BASELINE RD APT 320 23 78 915011 LJ,L.,,,' STOGNER WENDY 1 111 562-4834 WAKEFIELD J't l DAVEN CT s(. 79 151383 HARRIS REGINALD 2 111 372-0525 BALE 2906 TAYLOR 80 n 160127 HIGGINS EDMAR 2 111 663-2335 KING 5000 W 24TH ,5! 81 153913 SPENCER CHARLES 2 111 664-5188 FAIR PARK 4109 W 12TH 82 898881 CARWILE ANNA BELL 2..f 1 111 663-6361 BASELINE 2100 RINGO APT 4 83 903451 ROSBY KRISHAMA 2,:5 111 490-0143 BADGETT 10 DEVEREAUX bo 84 162403 PAGE RICKY 2 111 372-7917 JEFFERSON 217 S ELM APT 2 1,/ 85 159624 BROADWAY KENDRIA 2 111 376-3011 JEFFERSON 1210 DENNISON 86 ~5 159557 LINSLEY ERIC 1 111 374-4990 RIGHTS ELL 1505 S BROADWAY 87 ~'2, 916588 CULBERSON BRANDI 2 111 BASELINE 8700 COMMUNITY RD 88 898659 BUCKLEY MOLINDA 21,3 111 565-6166 WATSON 9307 OAK GROVE LN 89 166721 ODEM JACK 21,\u0026lt;/ 111 374-8844 MABELVALE 1503 WOLFE 90 158277 COPPING FREDRICK 1 'J_/, 111 224-1281 BRADY 1400 OLD FORGE DR BOOKER 06 GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 91 901343 JORDAN MICHAEL 1 :J7 111 562-1579 WASHINGTON 6819 DAHLIA c..S 92 155659 HUBBARD AMBER 2 112 375-3931 PULASKI HGTS E 3921 BARROW D ~c.. 93 157990 MCFADDEN BURGESS 2 112 227-0562 BADGETT 5 TALISMAN .,7 94 159595 HOOKS DOUGLAS 2 112 490-1228 BADGETT 2003 E 5TH 2.1 95 897855 ALEXANDER TIMOTHY 1 112 568-1261 DODD 8105 SOPHIA r 96 159102 MILLER BILLY 2 112 374-5215 ROCKEFELLER 1919 E 38TH ~, 97 898061 BALLARD LAURA 2 112 490-2848 BADGETT 9 SHELBY CR 98 910662 CASS JEDEDIAH l:t'i 113 664-2031 BALE 6900 CANTRELL APT G-11 99 157847 1 BRANCH ARABY 2 113 376-2714 CHICOT 2901 IZARD 100 158388 LOVELACE TERRY 2 1/ 113 374-4044 MABELVALE 23 WHITMORE CR 101 157322 MARBLEY LAURY 2 1v 201 375-3986 DODD 1812 S VANCE 102 916161 BLACK ANDREW r' 202 568-2401 FRANKLIN 18 BERKSHIRE 103 916461 PICCOLO MARISSA lJ/ 202 661-5806 PULASKI HGTS E 4301 W MARKHAM SLOT #632 104 899794 FAULKNER RICHARD 1 31- 202 224-3171 ROMINE 6 SOUTH SWEET BAY CT 105 915924 REEVES JASON 1 J3 211 223-3421 FAIR PARK 4710 SAM PECK RD APT 1148  w /-I I ~ .:= I /3 LAC.IC .=.. .i__, I CARVER 21 GRADE 00 I SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I 1 915371 /MAYWEATHER SHANNON 2 201 376-1461 CHICOT I 505 FLETCHER 2 916291 1TRAN THAO 4 201 223-0956 TERRY 10 LARIAT CT 3 915531 z. ELGEN JOHNNY 1 201 562-7667 GEYER SPGS 4725 HOFFMAN #7 I 4 916091 :z WATSON SAMANTHA 2 201 372-2514 NOT ASSIGN 921 TOWNSEND 5 916232 .3 HOLMES NATASHA 2 201 ROCKFELLER 3324 E 9TH 6 917048 y GUPTON PRINCESS 2 201 374-4066 NOT ASSIGN I 724 CORNING 7 917016 0 JONES SHELLY 2 201 562-6533 BASELINE 4618 STRATTON LN \"Joll,39 .3 \u0026amp;r, f(: ,7 llct,on S-p I 8 915868 c\nJACKSON DESHAWN 2 203 375-5230 DODD 2013 COMMERCE 9 915586 7 KILLINGSWORTH MICHAEL 2 204 372-7728 CLOVERDALE 1901 BRAGG ST 10 915587 J' KILLINGSWORTH DANIELLE2 204 372-7728 CLOVERDALE 1901 BRAGG 11 916692 f HANDY TORRELL 2 204 375-5312 MEADOWCLIFF 1609 COLLEGE 12 917037 yWALKER MICHAEL 1 204 758-3477 NOT ASSIGN PO BOX 45371 I 13 915347 .5' CLAYTON BETH 1 211 225-0756 MCDERMOTT 19 COACHLIGHT DR I 14 916281 (, WILBERN ZANE 1 211 568-5268 GEYER SPGS 7506 VEGA 15 915969 J MCCARTHER TORASA 1 212 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 4905 BALLINGER II II II CARVER 21 SEQ # STUDENT# NAME AND ADDRESS 16 915970 ( MCCARTHER LARRY 4905 BALLINGER 17 916474 ,0 DENNIS GARRY 2206 FAIR PARK GRADE 00 RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 212 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 2 213 224-3539 MCDERMOTT VJ H- I TE = I (3 LA C.. K. =-\ni___, CARVER 21 GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 911054 t GOODWIN CRYSTAL 1 374-0534 NOT ASSIGN 2123 SCOTT ST 2 910271 Z. KING TASHA 1 371-0203 BRADY 407 BOND 3 910379 I SAMUEL ALLEN 2 375-9563 FRANKLIN 603 CORNING 4 908307 ,3 SPICKES GARY 1 565-9137 ROCKFELLER 9 CURTIS CV 5 915184 fl JAMES JEREMY 1 227-0359 BRADY 5 BRADFORD 6 j WILBERS ZACHERY 1 568-6268 NOT ASSIGN 7 898466 'BRADSHAW MELISSA 2609 DORCHESTER 1 568-4825 NOT ASSIGN 8 910765 z. THOMAS SHANA 2 375-7827 JEFFERSON 2514 W 13TH ST 9 915855 3 GOYNES HARLISHA 2 101 375-7832 MABELVALE 1007 CALHOUN ST 10 914161 4- THOMAS NICOLE 2 101 375-7356 MEADOWCLIFF 8801 HERRICK LN 11 911886 f. RICHARDSON DERRICK 2 101 375-7902 CHICOT 2301 EAST 8TH 12 908190 6 DANIEL CARLTON 2 101 376-3012 CHICOT 711 CORNING 13 910115 7 FRAZIER LATARHIA 2 101 371-9759 CHICOT 713 CORNING 14 910191 8 JACOBS TAKAKO 2 102 374-9320 MABELVALE 1712 BROADWAY 15 911581 9 PHILLIPS ALEXANDRIA 2 102 663-5756 DODD 1411 BROWN CARVER 21 GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 16 910657 ? FRANKS NATHAN 1 102 666-3522 FAIR PARK 5501 \"A\" ST APT B 17 911619 /D HALL MICHAEL 2 102 375-5943 MABELVALE 2005 SOUTH STATE 18 910318 I/ JACKSON TANISHA 2 102 374-5570 CHICOT 2009 E 6TH ST 19 910382 JZ. HUGHES CHI-FA 2 102 375-2631 MEADOWCLIFF 1219 WELCH 20 913344 13 MONROE CHRISTOPHER 2 102 378-7907 WAKEFIELD 1100 BOUNDLESS 21 915876 ,JLf WILLIAMS RODERICK 1417 S RINGO 2 102 664-2057 RIGHT SELL 22 909720 B EDWARDS CHARLOTTE 1 103 224-9146 ROMINE 8 CATALINA CT 23 909558 /5 ARMSTRONG RANDALL 2 103 375-0564 OTTER CREEK 2210 SUMMIT 24 910285 lb GRAGGS JASON 2 103 372-6406 MEADOWCLIFF 1400 EAST 38TH ST 25 911700 / 7 POE RACHEL 2 111 374-1506 WAKEFIELD 704 KIMBALL 26 911267 / r BESTER KENT 2 111 375-0410 CLOVERDALE 219 CROSS APT 1 27 915574 /7 FRAZIER KELLY 2 111 374-9406 WAKEFIELD 709 APPERSON DR 28 907310 , STEPPIG TALYN 1 111 227-5347 FAIR PARK 13717 RIVERCREST 29 907311 STEPPING CHASE ,. 13717 RIVERCREST 1 111 227-5347 FAIR PARK 30 910485 20GILBERT KEAIRRA 2 111 375-0631 BADGETT 46 KRISPEL CARVER 21 GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 909434 1./ JOHNSON ARLENE 2 111 376-0245 BASELINE 45 KIRSPEL 32 907033 \" THOMPSON PHILLIP 1 111 223-3064 ROMINE 4 WOOD HILL CT 33 909585 II BAREL DAVID 1 111 224-0967 TERRY 2 COLEEN CT 34 907631 ,S MILLS HUNTER 1 111 664-5681 MCDERMOTT 1209 RANCH VALLEY RD 35 908278 ZL JONES CHERTIEU 2 111 663-2126 BALE 2321 S JACKSON 36 911989 Z'!\u0026gt; BRANNON CHRISTOPHER 2 112 376-1014 BADGETT 9 CURTIS 37 907031 v\nDAWSON LLOYD 2 112 TERRY 9302 RUTGERS DR 38 913327 2r WHITE STEPHANIE 2 113 568-4165 CLOVERDALE 6817 JUNIPER RD 39 916292 U:, TRAN TRUNG 4 201 223-0956 ROMINE 10 LARIAT CT 40 909955 /ti BISHOP KATHERINE 1 201 225-0985 ROMINE 505 DEERBROOK RD 41 916956 27 IM CHANG-HAN 6 201 223-3119 ROMINE 1912 GREEN MTN DR #4 42 916961 2-'6 BAIRD YASHA 2 201 374-0127 BASELINE 3219 E 6TH ST 43 915610 II ALESSI CHRISTINA 1 203 225-7362 ROMINE 3503 HAPPY VALLEY DR 44 915800 ,6 LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER 1 204 661-0376 PULASKI HTS E 7400 EVERGREEN 45 916069 2-1 GATIWALA PUJA 6 212 565-5802 BALE 6310 ASHER APT 608  WH ITF= I r3LA~K~a\u0026lt;,_, CARVER 21 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS 1 893210 ALFORD LESHEA 409 E 17TH ST 2 908048 l COLLIER MELANIE 907 CORNING 3 895017 3 SAMUEL NATASHA 38 KRISPEL 4 911579 Lf LAMB SHELDON 9805 CAPELLA 5 9096385 5 CAMPBELL JORDAN 2115 RICE 6 897518 b MACKINTROSH RAYEN 1519 S HARRISON 7 912532 7 PARKER JOHN 1401 S WASHINGTON 8 911562 \u0026lt;3 THOMPSON MIRANDA 11 CURTIS CV 9 894299 f CROSS AKINA 7100 TALMAGE 10 901229 Cj JONES AARON 4618 STRATTON 11 914901 lo HENRY CHRISTOPHER 7714 MOORE 12 907152 t FARNAM JESSICA 401 GAMBLE 13 894366 ! HARRIS GIBSON 9 NEW HAVEN CT 14 911977 I I HUNTER APRIL 3111 1/2 W 12TH ST 15 907152 ., FARNAN JESSICA 401 GAMBLE RD GRADE 02 RC CODE PHONE .jj rr SCHOOL 2 ROCKEFELLER 2 374-6791 ROCKEFELLER 2 375-9563 FRANKLIN 2 568-5451 NOT ASSIGN 2 372-3977 NOT ASSIGN 2 664-7007 GIBBS 2 664-8815 NOT ASSIGN 2 565-9137 ROCKEFELLER 1 565-3909 BALE 2 562-6533 NOT ASSIGN 2 562-7170 GEYER SPGS 1 225-1835 ROMINE 1 224-7713 FAIR PARK 2 101 DODD 1 101 225-1835 ROMINE CARVER 21 GRADE 02 SEQ~ STUDENT Jj 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 914875 ( 2.. BOYCE ANAIAH 2 101 565-4837 CLOVERDALE 2 SOUTHAVEN CT 4 17 896352 /3 GAY NEFERTAR 2 101 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KRISPEL PL 18 896585 lY FLOWERS DIONDRA 2 102 374-2759 ?-1\".ABELVALE 1323 WRIGHT AVE 314 19 896342 /5 BEENE CHEMER 2 102 374-1836 CHICOT 19 KIRSPEL 20 914048 /6 HIGGINS KELVIN 2 102 376-9354 CHICOT 2015 E 4TH 21 892636 / 7 ENGRAM KWAN D 2 103 666-7748 BALE 1108 S HUGHES 22 894631 5 BROWN CORA 1 104 225-9793 ROMINE 8922 FAIRHAVEN DR 23 894454 18 KILLINGSWORTH BRANDEN 2 104 372-7728 DODD 1901 BRAGG 24 895152 /'j DOZIER CRYSTAL 2 111 664-1298 FOREST PARK 2201 STYLER 25 894366 ' HARRIS GIBSON 1 111 224-7713 FAIR PARK 9 NEW HAVEN CT 26 894438 JONES GALEN 2.D 926 S WOODROW 2 111 666-6144 WOODRUFF 27 896353 21 GILBERT ROSALYN 2 111 BADGETT 46 KIRSPEL 28 896455 l7.. PITTS SHERILY 2 111 374-1506 WAKEFIELD 714 KIMBALL 29 896777 1 CLAYTON SARAH 1 111 225-0756 MCDERMOTT 19 COACHLIGHT 30 895336 23 BROWN JAMAL 2 111 376-1414 ROCKEFELLER 908 HARRINGTON  CARVER 21 GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 89830 ' STEEN JEB 1 112 225-5615 MCDERMOTT 9705 OVERBY CT 32 895031 ,2'-f DAWSON DEBORAH 2 112 227-9857 TERRY 9302 RUTGERS 33 895190 2S LEWIS ARTENIS 2 112 227-4883 ROMINE 2022 ROMINE 34 916686 ' BOWDEN MORGAN 1 201 224-1245 MCDERMOTT 1608 STONEHENGE PL 35 915822 RAYBON PAMELA 1 203 664-3329 FOREST PARK IO 6900 CANTRELL APT H2 36 915799 \" LAWRENCE JONATHON 1 204 661-0376 PULASKI HTS E 7400 EVERGREEN WI-+ I~= /3 L AC... /(._ =- :2_ CARVER 21 GRADE 03 s:::Q .! STUDENT \"-r' NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 891492 ( MAYWEATHER BRIDGETTE 2 376-1461 CHICOT 505 FLETCHER 2 890481 z_ SPRINGS DONNA 2 374-8310 NOT ASSIGN 49 KRISPEL 3 167067 3 SCOTT KIM 2 374-6379 CHICOT 5 SELMA PL 4 890198 '-f KING GLADYS 2 371-0203 BRADY 407 BOND 5 890119 s TRIBBLE AMANDA 2 375-5046 NOT ASSIGN 2405 W 16TH ST 6 893367 b AMIN GEOGINA EL 2 CHICOT 2704 E CAPITAL 7 910659 CASS SHAWN 1 664-2031 KING 6900 CANTRELL G-11 8 914903 7 HENRY KAMISHA 2 562-7170 GEYER SPGS 7714 MOORE 9 915871 D'AREZZO JAMES \"Z, 3119 ECHO VALLEY 1 224-9208 FULBRIGHT 10 890455 g GAY KEONA M 2 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL 11 904303 c\nTHOMAS WILLIE E 2 101 568-3247 MEADOWCLIFF 8801 HERRICK LANE 12 890180 /0 CALDWELL SHAUNTAY 2 101 376-8362 OTTER CREEK 2209 S SPRING 13 890465 It KELLEY MAURICE 2 101 372-3724 CHICOT 36 E KRISPEL 14 914165 /2 WILLIAMS JUANNISHA 2 101 374-7299 DODD 2907 E 6TH ST 15 911100 13 YOUNG PAUL J 2 101 376-4324 MABELVALE 2612 BISHOP CARVER 21 GRADE 03 SEO# STUDENT JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL \" 16 157012 /lf CARROL TERRY 2 102 374-0047 MEADOWCLIFF 1119 COLLEGE 17 892188 /') HALL SHANNON 2 102 663-0419 MABELVALE 2005 STATE 18 891494 /6 PASHA KHALEELAH 2009 E 6TH ST 2 102 374-5570 DODD 19 891497 /7 WILLIAMS KENDALL 2 102 372-5703 BASELINE 38 HOLLINGSWORTH 20 890376 / g JOHNSON CALVIN 2 102 568-0366 DODD 5611 OLD HICKORY 21 892999 /1 HUDSON ALBERT 2 103 664-5852 DODD 4116 W 22ND 22 890178 W MCNUTT ANNTIONETE 2 104 372-3444 WILSON 7824 PARKWOOD DR 23 164786 l BROWN VIRGIL 1 104 225-9793 ROMINE 8922 FAIRHAVEN RD 24 893579 2/ BRADLEY TRAMAYNE 2 104 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE DR 25 890152 2-L HUGHES BRANDON 2 104 WILSON 2319 W 12TH ST 26 898359 Y BONDS SEAN 1 111 565-7112 CLOVERDALE 4624 STRATTON 27 904321 S THOMPSON JILL R 1 111 223-3064 ROMINE 4 WOODHILL CT 28 896387 2-3 WILLIAMS MARLON 2 111 664-0640 BADGETT 823 MAXWELL 29 896945 ' MITCHELL ROBERT 1 111 562-5155 WILSON 1812 RESERVOIR APT 292 30 155188 V{ CLAYBORN NATHAN 4409 W 25TH 2 111 661-9847 KING CARVER 21 GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT .a rt NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 890469 Z.,f LITTLES SHANNON 2 111 376-1414 ROCKEFELLER 908 HARRINGTON 32 162798 7 GOODWIN ADRIENNE 1 111 225-7012 WILSON 2023 DORCHESTER 33 166914 LG GILBERT SHARONA 2 111 BADGETT 46 KRISPEL PL 34 915856 27 GILLMORE CARLOS 2 111 MABELVALE 909 WELCH 35 896927 1 HOLEN CHRISTOPHER 1 111 568-0919 WILSON 4421 FOSTER 36 903682 2.g' SHAVERS SHUNDA 2 111 490-0398 BADGETT 4 ROSE MEADOW PL 37 167112 27 THOMPSON MARCUS 2 111 376-0245 BASELINE 45 KRISPEL 38 891824 )0 BREWER GEORGE 2 111 490-1228 BADGETT 2003 E 5TH ST 39 890346 31 WESLEY KEVIN 2 112 225-4854 GEYER SPGS 3223 SUMMIT 40 894651 3z. HENSON WINFRED 2 113 661-9326 FAIR PARK 3407 W 12TH 41 915869 3-S SMITH SHAQUITA 2 202 WESTERN HILLS 1306 LOUISANA 42 915798 , LAWRENCE ROBERT 1 204 661-0376 PULASKI HGTS E 7400 EVERGREEN 43 909846 fo TORRES HARRY 1 211 376-6527 BASELINE 2600 S STATE 44 915723 ft SIEGEL ROBERT 1 211 455-1131 MABELVALE 33 OLD ORCHARD DR SEQ -!/ STUDENT 1 164416 2 900170 3 157416 4 904805 5 911580 6 909639 7 167276 8 892492 9 10 162379 11 167700 12 899388 13 914902 14 15 166873 d--., I JI Tr CARVER :1 NAME AND ADDRESS \\.\n_). - 1 BORKINS NECOLE 1717 E 21ST 7 GIVENS ALONDRA ., 9719 TAMELA , NOLAN CRISHA _, 6200 ASHER APT 201 '-/ WHITFIELD TIMBUTA 1221 RESERVOIR ,- LAMB CARMEN - 9805 CAPELLA I BRUNSON KEVIN ~ 2115 S RICE 7 PERRY PHILLIP 3117 RINGO . WARREN IRA ! 9418 SOUTHBORO CT\nSTEGNER SARAH 0 FOTI FLETCHER 5018 COUNTRY CLUB 9 MORRISON RICHARD 1115 CALHOUN J DAVIS TAMMY 100 RICE APT 1 / .. BRADLEY SHEMEKA 7714 MOORE L\nBOYCE ANTHONY _\nHARRIS AUBREY 9 NEW HAVEN GRADE 04 RC CODE PHONE JI SCHOOL Tr 2 378-7800 MEADOWCIFF 2 562-6882 CLOVERDALE 2 565-6844 NOT ASSIGN 2 562-4313 MCDERMOTT 2 568-5451 NOT ASSIGN 2 372-3977 NOT ASSIGN 2 375-4502 ISH 2 565-1523 BASELINE 1 682-6292 NOT ASSIGN 1 666-1897 FOREST PARK 2 374-8623 CHICOT 1 375-1942 FAIR PARK 2 562-7170 CHICOT 1 565-48 17 NOT ASSIGN 1 224-7713 FAIR PARK CARVER 21 GRADE 04 SEQ~ STUDENT J.,I NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 899405 :' DEAN DANIEL 1 455-4412 MITCHELL 13 600 OTTER CREEK 17 156961 /, GAY NICHOLE 2 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KISPEL 18 163178 /.' DUNN BROOKE 2 562-2290 MEADOWCLIFF 7 LAMONT 19 914874 /:. BOYCE CECIL 2 SOUTHAVEN 2 565-4837 CLOVERDALE CT APT 4 20 156974 fa WILLIAMS ALBERT 2 375-4925 BADGETT  9 2 4 CALHOUN 21 896468 1::- LITTLES RUTHIE 2 376-7785 PULASKI HGTS E 3324 E 9TH 22 914164 /4 WILLIAMS JAMES 2 374-7299 DODD 2907 E 6TH 23 167110 1 , GAY TAMEIKA 2 372-4848 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PL 24 167129 !, BARNES CATINA 2 375-0812 CHICOT 711 CORNING 25 160910 I THOMAS LATEEFAH 2 MEADOWCLIFF '/ 8801 HERRICK LN 26 156962 ,., GAY TINA 2 374-7487 CHICOT ,, - 50 KRISPEL 27 161162 I BAREL AVIGAIL 1 224-0967 ROMINE 2 COLEEN CT 28 160021 ,') 1 HUGHES KHOMEINI 2 375-2631 MEADOW CLIFF 1219 WELCH 29 167090 ::\u0026gt;: PITTS SHILENEA 2 372-5703 CHICOT 38 HOLLINGSWORTH 30 164416 ~~BORKINS NECOLE 2 378-7800 MEADOWCLIFF 1717 E 21ST CARVER 21 GRADE 04 SEQ:\nSTUDENT ..I NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE JI ,r :r SCHOOL 31 161886 , 'BRADLEY TANESHA 1 104 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE 32 166669 7 BEACHBOARD JOHN T 1 111 224-5205 MCDERMOTT 15 COACHLIGHT 33 160611 .'-'Y ANDERSON KIMBERLY 2 111 664-7097 FRANKLIN 3216 ELAM 34 157609 -~':'.'OLIVER CALVIN 2 111 663-6540 FRANKLIN 4405 W 18TH 35 163177 /c PENDLETON DANIEL 1 111 562-2558 MEADOWCLIFF 44 SHERATON DR 36 898418 )_ BOYD KOKETA 2 111 562-4970 BASELINE 3801 ARAPAHO TR 37 160751 2? JACKSON TIFFANY 2 111 PULASKI HGTS E 4322 W 22ND 38 164448 ~r,, WILLIAMS QUINCY 2 111 664-3258 BADGETT 823 MAXWELL 39 165674 '.\u0026lt;-\n, LEWIS ANDRE 2 112 227-0471 ROMINE 2022 ROMINE RD 40 167084 .:.,c, SCOTT JAMES 2 112 375-3796 BADGETT 912 S BEDFORD 41 168323 --, , PASHA SHAMARI 2 112 374-5570 GIBBS 2009 E 9TH ST 42 908909 3.,, ROBINSON BILLY 2 112 MABELVALE 34 HATFIELD 43 911852 I\nKACHMAN WILLIAM 18 COACHLIGHT 1 112 824-3430 STEPHENS 44 899183 :s CRAIG KRISTI 2 112 562-3192 CLOVERDALE 9806 RAMONA 45 167177 _y JONES JENNIFER 2 112 664-5435 FOREST PARK 2012 S VAN BUREN CARVER 21 GRADE 04 SEO:! STUDENT jj NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE jj SCHOOL -r :r 46 910680 -:\n, WILFORD RACHEL ~ ~ 18 LAKESIDE DR 2 112 565-1979 WESTERN HILLS 47 913929 ,(. ALLEN CEDRIC 2 113 565-4165 CLOVERDALE 9817 JUNIPER 48 899388 I ) / DAVIS TAMMY 1 113 375-1942 FAIR PARK 100 RICE ST APT 1 49 915821 13 RAYBON JULIE 1 203 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRELL APT H2 50 909835 / :. TORRES LUIS 1 211 376-6527 BASELINE 1 2 600 STATE uJ.\n-\nT6 = I .ISL.A:')( - al......, SEQ:/ STUDENT 1 152908 2 891834 3 912850 4 904062 5 903952 6 911824 7 914531 8 9 914427 10 11 911731 12 900815 13 900748 14 902440 15 150976 CARVER 21 JI NAME AND ADDRESS -r I JONES KNELL 5716 VALLEY DR APT 1 .1 MCGAUGHEY TAMIKA 30 KRISPEL / VINSON ASHELY 11810 PLEASENT RIDGE 3 STEWART LAKETA 4305 W 22ND ST 2 SPICKES LISA 9 CURTIS CV 3 BROWN BRANDY 9201 KANIS APT 10 r MANUEL TIMOTHY 6711 HONEYSUCKLE S BRANCH JENNIFER C HARCOURT LEA 4710 SAM PECK APT 1189 7 MITCHUM JOHN y HOLT NATAUSHE 1812 RESERVOIR APT 138 ? HOLLEMAN MELISSA 8601 HERRICK APT 12 04 6 HILL NICHOLAS 8021 PRESTON MOORMAN MARCI 7 7709 CLAYBROOK c_. WARREN BYRON 4009 W 11TH GRADE 05 RC CODE PHONE JTTI SCHOOL 2 NOT ASSIGN 2 376-7716 CHICOT 1 224-8624 NOT ASSIGN 2 JEFFERSON 1 565-9137 ROCKERFELLER 1 221-3765 NOT ASSIGN 1 455-5008 DODD 1 776-0621 NOT ASSIGN 1 227-2000 NOT ASSIGN 1 568-1309 NOT ASSIGN 2 223-9818 NOT ASSIGN 1 565-9144 RIGHTS ELL 2 565-2762 MABELVALE 1 568-1792 CHICOT 2 374-4029 MCDERMOTT CA.R'lER 21 GRA.DE 05 S'.:'Q :: STUDENT - :N\n\u0026gt; '1E _\nND .\nDDR,:\n,SS RC CODE PHONE .:L SCHOOL 16\noE~OWN CATHERINE 1 661-5828 NOT ASSIGN 17 155757 7 .\nLBRIGHT 3010 HIGH DE'KOREY 2 101 372-0428 MABELVALE 18 156629 ,v FLOWERS JAMES 2 101 CHICOT 7 1_ o~ FOLSOM 19 156975 i WI:SLL\\MS NAKILLE 2 101 375-5169 CHICOT 35 HOLLINGSWORTH 20 153775 It RIN:C:Y TGTREA 2 101 224-3341 MCDERMOTT 2316 GUNPOWDER 21 902440 11 Y!OOR.vf.AN MARCI 1 101 568-1792 CHICOT 7709 CLAYBROOK 22 91-il66 ~ 3ER..qYHILL ERIC 2 101 375-4517 DODD 290, W 6TH ST 23 159932 1!__ .:l.CST:::::r BRIAN 2 101 790-0612 BADGETT 2 ROSE MEADOWS PL 24 161394 / j BC'LLOCK KERRIE 2 101 375-5943 DODD 2005 STATE 25 915582 /:,' ALLEN DEREK 2 101 666-7196 PULASKI HGTS E 2420 RIVERFRONT APT 166 26 911101 ,,s YOUNG SHANNON 2 101 376-4324 MABELVALE 2612 BISHOP 27 903515 ii:, RuTH CHRIS 2 102 568-0385 BASELINE 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON ElO 28 156968\n7 NELSON SHALONDA 2 102 372-3213 CHICOT 79 HOLLINGSWORTH 29 164200 I BCRK JAMES 1 102 224-0265 TERRY - ~10910 BRECKENRIDGE RD 30 160241 /.?PASHA ZA.RIFA 2 102 374-5570 HEADOWCLIFF 2009 E 6TH - I C.:\\RVER 21 GR:.\\DE 05 S\"::Q = STuDE~TT .J N~~1E .~\"TD ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE .J SC'.-IOOL 31 156352 . /'f MOORE TONY 2 102 371-9635 CHICOT 801 ~.PPERSON 32 167095 ~o TIDWELL DOMINIC 2 102 374-4091 .ABEL VALE 1708 IZARD APT 114 33 157365 2/ PI?PINS ERIC 2 102 372-0289 OTTER CREEK 1614 W 23RD 34 163190 :?2- GAINES MONICA 2 102 666-3797 MCDERMOTT 917 JEFFERSON 35 156861 73 ROUNDSVILLE LEVAR 2 102 375-6667 C'.-:ICOT 814 M.AXWELL 36 165325 _,.,, SMITH KEVAN 2 103 377-3613 DODD 916 w 16TH APT 305 -,~ ~ I 157339 JS AR}!STRONG ALEX-:\\ 2 103 375-2649 OTTER CREEK 22 J.O s SUMMIT 38 161473 ,?l. MOR.-qis JIMMY 2 103 224-2358 BALE 3124 ECHO VALLEY DR 39 913440 13 TRABAL LILLIAN 3 104 376-1004 STEPHENS 1221 1/2 w 33RD 40 157990 .n MCFADDEN BURGESS 2 111 227-0562 BADGETT 5 TALISMAN 41 159595 lJ HOOKS DOUGLAS 2 111 490-1228 BADGETT 2003 E 5TH 42 897855 2VALEXANDER TIMOTHY 2 111 568-1261 DODD 8105 SOPHIA DR 43 155765 ,Jo JACKSON JAMES 2 111 372-3290 FAIR PARK 2509 IZARD -.,.., 166391 /tf WALTER PHILIP 1 111 225-3320 ROCKEFELLER 12581 SOUTHRIDGE DR -\u0026lt;, :-:, 156969 J, PITTS REGINA 2 111 374-1506 WAKEFIELD 714 KIMBALL GRADE 05 S~Q :: STUDENT ..,..i N~~E AND ADDRESS RC CODE PEONE ..i SCEOOL 46 156871 J2WILLIA.:.~S TERRELL 2 111 375-9508 BADGETT 823 MAXWELL 47 916262 (~CA~DWELL NATHAN 1 111 666-7083 BALE 400 N UNIVERSITY APT 100 48 910662 !e, CP.SS JEDEDIAH 1 112 664-2031 BALE 6900 CANTRELL APT Gll 49 903988 ,,\nSTAMPS KHA.RI 2 112 565-0672 BASELINE 10 ROCCO DR 50 912659 r\nELDER JESSICA 1 112 664-7128 KING 2918 w 26TH 51 903475 ,t ROWE TAMARA 1 113 568-5346 CLOVERDALE 8309 KEATS DR 52 916683 /.- BOWDEN CULLEN 1 201 224-1245 MCDERMOTT 7 1608 STONEHENGE PL 53 916461 .\n:_,PICCOLO MARISSA 1 203 661-5806 PULASKI HGTS 4301 W MARKHAM SLOT 632 54 899794 )/FAULKNER RICHARD 1 203 224-3171 ROMINE 6 s SWEET BAY CT CARVER 21 GRADE 06 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 909599 /RICE MARK 2 225-9380 NOT ASSIGN 1223 JENNIFER 2 912843 1 SUTTON BEN 1 562-2698 MITCHELL 7712 BUNCH 3 892059 J COONEY MISCHA \"6311 BOYLE PARK 2 666-5353 TERRY 4 160441 J TOOMBS BRIAN 2 562-4853 CHICOT 3946 ARAPAHO TRAIL 5 902439 .).. MOORMAN JARED 1 568-1792 CHICOT 7709 CLAYBROOK 6 904733 3 WELLS EDWARD 1 568-0982 WAKEFIELD 5001 W 65TH 7 907364 'j WHITEHURST LESLIE 1 221-0203 JEFFERSON 27 LEDGELAWN 8 158238 s WILLIAMS LIBBY 1 224-4843 WILLIAMS 8214 REYMERE 9 153218 (, DEAN WILLIAM 1 455-4412 MITCHELL 13600 OTTER CREEK PKWY APT 140 10 152472 i/ GAY CORETTA 2 101 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PL 11 137441 ,5' MEANUS FREDDIE 2 101 376-1975 BASELINE 709 CORNING 12 902283 1 MILLER JENNIFER 1 101 565-8227 GEYER SPGS 6614 ONYX 13 900826 C, HOLLIS FAITH 2 102 327-8040 BASELINE 9500 SOUTH HEIGHTS APT 247 14 156895 11 TIDWELL CAROLS 2 102 374-4091 MABELVALE 1 1708 IZARD APT 114 15 157244 y ARMSTRONG KARLOSTENA 2 103 375-5135 OTTER CREEK 2210 S SUMMIT CARVER 21 GRADE 06 s:::Q # STUDENT .,!,L. NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 154933 ') BUTLER SHANDELYN 2 104 666-6147 FAIR PARK 2119 S HARRISON 17 909477 '( JACKSON STEPHANIE 1 104 223-3694 FRANKLIN 1004 FAWNWOOD RD 18 894348 10 JAJ1ES TONYA 2 104 223-9084 TERRY 9116 W 35TH ST 19 151477 II AARON PAMELA 2 111 375-4925 BADGETT 924 CALHOUN 20 893202 / .? SHEPHERD KENDRICK 2 111 376-7515 WAKEFIELD 1115 CALHOUN 21 161500 /' BLAIR CALVIN 2 111 228-9268 JEFFERSON J 1770 BARROW RD APT 102 22 159761 /\nt, DOZIER ROX ANN 2 111 664-9404 FULBRIGHT 2201 STYLER 23 901117 l JOHNSON BRANDY 1 112 BASELINE 5813 BASELINE RD APT 101 24 904866 1 - WILLIAMS ANDREA 2 112 562-0198 MABELVALE ~ 9531 WOODFORD DR APT B 25 154516 It. JONES TEMEKKA 2 112 568-1084 DODD 5609 OLD HICKORY RD 26 901543 /u LACY JERED 1 112 568-6751 WAKEFIELD 10 APPLE COVE 27 900079 I/ GARRETT DANIEL 1 112 565-3515 MABELVALE 9403 WOODFORD 28 899184 J,7 CRAIG MICHAEL 2 112 562-3192 CLOVERDALE ' 9806 RAMONA 29 158042 /J ISUM TENESHA 2 113 227-6012 TERRY I 1915 KIMBERLY JO 915551 /2. COOK CHARLA 1 201 225-9382 ROMINE I 8 WALNUT VALLEY I CARVER 21 GRADE 06 S~Q :: STUDENT .\nJ -r NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 915653 ,'~::. GRAY ALLISON 1 201 568-1397 CLOVERDALE 7315 AZALEA 32 917266 I'/ COFFEY JOLEE 1 202 227-0393 NOT ASSIGN 9519 LABETTE 33 915820 ),:- RAYBON JILL 1 203 664-3329 FOREST PARK  6900 CANTRELL APT H2 34 916879 ., LINDSEY LLEWELLYN ''-- 1 204 455-0300 ROMINE 13017 LEMONCREST LN 35 916983 /,7 WALTON MICHAEL 1 211 562-9401 FRANKLIN 4005 WEST DR 36 916723 /3 LOCKWOOD REBECCA 1 211 227-7952 JEFFERSON 8312 REYMERE /J.}\n-/ I TE = I /.j Lr, C-K.. = c:2.., SEQ# STUDENT 1 916038 2 915415 3 916032 4 917045 5 915785 6 915371 7 915422 8 915494 9 915342 10 915531 11 916628 12 916284 13 915656 14 915840 15 916468 .u TT GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 00 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL JACKSON JAY M 01 201 375-5748 ROCKEFELLER 2111 LOUISIANA ALLISON TYRONE J 02 201 375-6723 FAIR PARK 1600 SPARK BURRUSS MAMIE C 01 201 376-3676 FRANKLIN 1617 S BATTERY JONES ALANNA N 02 201 376-6501 NOT ASSIGN 35 IVES WALK LAMB THEODORE R 01 201 225-3863 ROMINE 9006 CLOVERHILL MAYWEATHER SHANNON 02 202 376-1461 CHICOT 505 FLETCHER ST JANS DAVID C 01 202 664-8345 PUL HGHTS E 8 AMARILLO CR BATES STEVEN L 02 202 666-3388 MABELVALE E 1702 WOODROW WARE ANNA D 01 202 227-7855 TERRY 11 PERDIDO CR ELGEN JOHNNY D 01 202 562-7667 GEYER SPRGS 4725 HOFFMAN #7 WILLIAMS DERRICK M 02 202 223-8321 WILSON 3013 VANCOUVER DR MCCLAIN LAUREN 02 203 CHICOT 7717 CLAYBROOK LANE KELVIN W 02 203 661-1615 MABELVALE E 2912 W 25TH ST HENRY LAUREN D 01 204 664-6762 BRADY 7502 CHOCTAW RD HENRY KEVIN L 02 204 372-2421 MEADOWCLIFF 1423 E 11TH ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 00 SEQ= STUDENT Jl NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1t 16 915300 SANDERS WILLIAM 01 204 227-6726 FULBRIGHT 7 CAPE COD COURT 17 907239 GRIFFEN AARON 01 204 562-3443 MABELVALE E 7221 SHADY GROVE LN 18 915868 JACKSON DESHAWN L 02 204 375-5230 DODD 2013 COMMERCE ST 19 915474 EASTER ELESHA J 02 211 372-1690 CENTRAL HIGH 2450 SPARK ST 20 916413 SURRATT KIRK C 02 211 374-6993 RIGHTS ELL 1610 CROSS 21 915279 ALDERFER GARRETT 01 211 661-9472 JEFFERSON 2816 CIRCLEWOOD RD 22 916286 HESSE JORDAN R 01 211 221-0800 TERRY 12611 TIMBER HILL DR 23 915937 MCDANIEL ASHLEY 02 211 666-7231 JEFFERSON 1809 PRINCETON 24 916101 TISDALE ERICA 02 211 664-0978 GEYER SPRGS E 1901 S VALENTINE 25 916093 MADYUN AHMAD S 02 211 372-3712 PUL HGHTS ELEM 1118 HIGH 26 916030 HONAKER MICHAEL B 01 211 666-7832 CENTRAL HIGH 311 SOUTH JOHNSON 27 916389 SYKES BRIAN A 02 211 372-2845 RIGHTS ELL 2001 MAIN #9 28 915496 GREENWOOD JEROME 02 211 374-4616 RIGHTS ELL 2401 W 13TH ST 29 916469 HENDERSON KELLI 02 211 663-5 9 69 BRADY 2123 SPINE ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 00 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 30 916505 BURTON COLBY L 02 211 374-0125 RIGHTS ELL 615 W 14TH ST 31 916510 FINN KRISTINA 02 211 375-8232 RIGHTS ELL 1715 PULASKI 32 916512 JONES MONTAYE 02 211 375-8232 RIGHTSELL 1715 PULASKI 33 916529 HENDERSON DEDRA L 02 211 666-6696 PUL HGHTS ELEM 3412 W 14TH ST 34 916541 KELLY MEGAN A 01 211 562-1627 DODD 8710 WINSTON DR 35 916542 CASTEEL LAURA M 01 211 568-6479 CLOVERDALE E 6609 AZALEA DR 36 916569 WILLIS MARQUIS 02 211 568-6268 FAIR PARK 4815 MABEL. PIKE #4B 37 916620 WOODS ERIC T 01 211 568-6642 MCCLELLEAN 8715 VERBENA 33 916638 BOYKINS LA'TORRIA 02 211 372-4823 RIGHTS ELL 1905 HIGH 39 916656 JONES KATHRYN H 01 211 3 7 4-09.18 ROCKEFELLER 1409 ARCH 40 916675 HAHN MEGHAN E 01 211 372-5963 RIGHTS ELL 209 W 14TH ST 41 916917 BEW ANTONIE 02 211 370-6427 CENTRAL 1812 BATTERY 42 916837 MAYFIELD BRENISHA 02 211 376-8016 CENTRAL 2201 WRIGHT AVE #D 43 916215 HOEY HEATHER M 01 212 664-7519 BOOKER 49 GLENMERE DR - 44 916052 ROBINSON LAURA 01 212 663-1038 PUL HGHTS ELEM 604 NORTH OAK - GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 00 SEQ= STUDENT \"JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE \"JI SCHOOL 45 916421 REID DUANE A 02 212 374-8363 RIGHTS ELL 2219 IZARD 46 915561 WHITE TAMBRA 02 212 664-7835 PUL HGHTS ELEM 4101 WO 21ST ST 47 916499 GOVAN CHRISTOPHER 02 212 224-3740 TERRY 1912 GREEN MN DR #212 48 915969 MCCARTHER TORASA G 01 213 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 4905 BALLINGER 49 915623 HARRISON HUNTER 01 213 663-5065 FOREST PARK 2115 N MCKINLEY 50 915347 CLAYTON BETH ANN 01 213 225-0756 MCDERMOTT 19 COACHLIGHT DR 51 915970 MCCARTHER LARRY 01 213 562-2130 WAKEFIELD 4905 BALLINGER 52 915829 GUESS JOSEPH 02 213 374-5887 RIGHTS ELL 2810 CROSS ST 53 917227 LANE RICKEA 02 374-5815 CLOVERDALE E 1919 E 38TH ST 54 917103 COLEMAN SARAH 02 371-4846 BASELINE 9200 RICKY LANE 55 915711 JOHNSON DANA 01 663-6604 FULBRIGHT 917 N BRYAN 56 916542 CASTEEL LAURA 01 568-6479 CLOVERDALE E 6609 AZALEA 57 917583 FRAZIER EBONY 02 374-2049 WOODRUFF 913 CORNING 58 917580 FORTENBERRY JANE 01 227-6019 BRADY 9 CAPE COD 59 916620 WOODS ERIC T 01 568-6642 MCCLELLEAN 8715 VERBENA  GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 00 SEQ = STUDENT : NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 60 917787 CARUTHERS JOHN 01 666-7092 PARKVIEW 12 BEVERLY PLACE 61 916417 KRULIN MICHAEL 01 227-8906 NOT ASSIGN 25 LONGLEA DR 62 916419 KRULIN JEFFREY 01 227-8906 NOT ASSIGN 25 LONGLEA DR 63 BENNETT JOEY 02 565-1409 NOT ASSIGN 664-5002 64 918523 CRAWFORD JOI 02 376-9812 NOT ASSIGN 2500 CHESTER 65 918639 BARGAR MEGAN 01 225-6264 FAIR PARK 7709 ILLINOIS 66 918634 MCAWAY LANESHIA 02 372-3401 CENTRAL 1215 CROSS uil-1 I Tl= = I ~ LA-C..K = ..2__ SEQ# STUDENT 1 910361 2 912028 3 907358 4 910096 5 907012 6 9103 02 7 907605 8 910035 9 896143 10 905603 11 915184 12 894527 13 913574 14 914036 15 916074 16 913508 # GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL TAYLOR TIRRA 02 376-1449 PUL HGHTS ELE:-1 1314 PARK HARRISON STEFANIE 01 664-2574 FAIR PARK 15 POINT O WOODS GOSS SARAH 01 664-5538 JEFFERSON 7 LOMBARDY LANE FIELDS JONATHAN 01 376-8044 PUL HGHTS ELEM 126 RIVERSIDE DR SCOGGINS ASHLEY 01 666-6462 PUL HGHTS ELE'! 115 S BROWN LEE KAMEELA 02 372-2630 BRADY 1821 MARSHALL WARE KEVIN 01 224-8083 ROMINE 20A LEHIGH CT DANSBY LATHAINE 02 565-6520 CLOVERDALE E 8419 BASELINE #14 RUMPH CYNTHIA 01 666-4857 FAIR PARK 3302 LAMAR ST #B HILL JEFFERY 01 225-3544 MCDERMOTT 8822 OLD SPANISH TRL JAMES JERMEY D 01 227-0359 BRADY 5 BRADFORD DR WALKER JASON 02 376-7042 MITCHELL 1615 CHESTER #306 TAYLOR JERRON 02 562-3080 WILLIAMS 8 ROSEMOOR DR PARKS NIGEL 02 375-0648 RIGHTS ELL 1222 PLEASANT FOREST DR SKINNER ROBERT 01 455-1671 NOT ASSIGN 46 CARROLL CR WALLACE WILLIAM G 02 101 663-2209 OTTER CREEK 3114 W 16TH ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT -ii 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 17 905333 EVERHART CALVIN 02 101 372-4054 DODD 1517 CENTER ST #4 18 911674 HUNTER MARCUS D 02 101 663-3438 JEFFERSON 1760 BARROW RD #114 19 910180 HARRIS BYRON 02 101 MCDERMOTT 1105 THAYER 20 895784 GROSS ROBERT L 02 101 666-8073 DODD 916 W 16TH BLDG 1 - 21 911262 BROWNLEE ADAM 02 101 376-8372 GEYER SPRGS E 1904 RICE ST 22 911827 ROBINSON THOMASINA 02 101 371-0271 MEADOWCLIFF 1404 E llTH ST 23 913162 RUSS ALKIA L 02 101 223-8285 TERRY I] 2124 LABETTE MANOR DR 24 913973 DAVIS SHARESE 02 101 490-0219 FAIR PARK 1712 HIGH ST 25 913182 CLAY DEWAYNE 02 101 375-8674 MCDERMOTT 1515 W 15TH ST 26 913155 ESKRIDGE RACHEAL 02 101 FAIR PARK 1617 S MAPLE 27 913813 MAXWELL ERIN 01 102 225-3676 ROMINE 1414 KINGS MOUNTAIN DR 28 909720 EDWARDS CHARLOTTE 01 102 224-9146 ROMINE 8 CATALINA COURT 29 910804 POWELL JAMIE 02 102 375-3116 MCDERMOTT 1515 BISHOP 30 909997 CALDWELL ASHLEY 01 102 224-3172 WILSON 2713 QUEBEC 31 915473 OSBORNE SIOBHAN 02 102 224-6807 TERRY 3314 DUKE COURT GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT -.,\". NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 32 913181 MAXWELL HEATHER 01 102 225-3676 ROMINE 1414 KINGS MOUNTAIN DR 33 913235 JACKSON DEANGLEA 02 103 666-6668 FOREST PARK 1804 S MARTIN 34 912946 GUESS BRANDON 02 103 374-5887 CHICOT 2810 CROSS 35 910657 FRANKS NATHAN 01 103 666-3522 FAIR PARK 5501 A ST #B 36 909962 BOYKIN KRISTOPHER 02 103 374-6530 FOREST PARK 2324 W 11TH ST 37 910318 JACKSON TANISHA 02 103 374-5570 CHICOT 2009 W 6TH ST 38 910382 HUGHES CHI RA 02 103 375-2631 MEADOWCLIFF 1219 WELCH 39 910775 WALKER KATRINA 02 103 374-0985 MEADOWCLIFF 1303 COLLEGE 40 910589 ASHLEY NELLIE 02 103 375-9828 MABELVALE E 1405 W 17TH ST 41 910191 JACOBS TAKAKO 02 104 374-9320 MABELVALE E 1712 BROADWON #3 42 909558 ARMSTRONG RANDALL 02 104 375-0564 OTTER CREEK 2210 SUMMIT 43 910209 JOHNSON CRYSTAL R 02 104 372-0388 MEADOWCLIFF 1419 COLLEGE 44 913344 MONROE CHRISTOPHER 02 104 378-7907 WAKEFIELD 1100 BOUNDLESS ST 45 907226 GOLLADAY JOSHUA G 01 111 224-5764 MCDERMOTT 910 GILLETTE DR 46 909858 TIMS SHARA 02 111 225-5223 FULBRIGHT 1412 W 14TH ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT .ti 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 47 907766 WAGE ROBERT 01 111 663-8185 JEFFERSON 206 MCMILLEN TRAIL 48 910412 KNOX KAREN R 02 111 565-7729 BRADY 11500 CHICOT #6 49 910236 JONES SHARORA 02 111 375-4261 BRADY 1801 DENNISON 50 910220 JOHNSON TRAVIS J 02 111 375-6703 BASELINE 1516 HIGH 51 907503 PALINSKI ABIGAIL 01 111 224-5293 FAIR PARK 10740 BAINBRIDGE 52 911954 HARDY YASMEEN 02 111 664-0905 FOREST PARK 3814 W 20TH ST 53 914845 KEARNEY JASON 01 111 663-5897 FRANKLIN 1309 S JACKSON ST 54 908273 MONTGOMERY DERRICK A 02 111 666-3588 FAIR PARK 1902 S HARRISON 55 907521 JAMES LAVARUS A 02 111 375-1354 RIGHTS ELL 1604 IZARD #209 56 912246 MARTIN DENNIS 02 111 376-7502 WOODRUFF 619 SOUTH OAKS 57 910848 STEWART LYNDSEY 02 111 455-0565 DODD 4711 N TIMBERLAND DR 58 910608 RUDLEY BOBBIE C 02 111 372-5580 BASELINE 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON =G-20 59 911480 WAYNE CHARLANDA 02 111 568-2912 BRADY 3804 WALKER 60 911124 WILLIS QUENTIN 02 111 664-n71 FAIR PARK 1503 BOOKER ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT .!I TT NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 61 910855 WILLIAMS ALVIN s 02 111 663-5969 BRADY 2123 SPINE ST 62 912974 SHELTON TOMARA 02 111 372-3882 BRADY 2021 W 10TH ST 63 913198 STEPHENS AMBER 02 111 666-4428 TERRY 2021 BROWN 64 911907 FREEMAN MALACHI 02 111 666-5269 FRANKLIN 4908 W 29TH ST 65 894297 BUTTS ANNA 01 111 BRADY 8100 LEAWOOD BLVD 66 915574 FRAZIER KELLY 02 112 374-9406 WAKEFIELD 709 APPERSON DR 67 907310 STEPPIG TALYN 01 112 227-5347 FAIR PARK 13717 RIVERCREST 68 907311 STEPPIG CHASE 01 112 227-5347 FAIR PARK 13717 RIVERCREST 69 909963 BRADY EMILY 01 112 562-2015 WESTERN HILLS 1 LAKESIDE DR 70 913327 WHITE STEPHANIE 02 112 568-4165 CLOVERDALE E 6817 JUNIPER RD 71 910765 THOMAS SHANA 02 112 375-7827 BRADY 2514 W 13TH ST 72 916738 WOODFIELD JESSIKA 01 112 663-8901 FAIR PARK 1413 S FAIR PARK BLVD 73 910637 MILLER MARY A 02 113 568-1076 MABELVALE E 10402 MILKWAY DR 74 907756 MURRAY MELISSA A 01 113 224-3546 FAIR PARK 11170 BAINBRIDGE DR 75 916338 COLLIE WILLIAM 01 201 224-8038 MCDERHOTT 8 FLINTWOOD GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT .u rt NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 76 916269 ELDRIDGE AMY 01 201 664-1662 FAIR PARK 419 BOBWHITE DR #120 77 916757 DAVIS SYLVIA A 02 201 372-6598 NOT ASSIGN 2123 IZARD 78 916765 ROBINSON MELCHISEDEC 02 201 374-2605 MABELVALE E 1615 CHESTER #109 79 916754 EVANS BRANDON 02 201 375-2577 FULBRIGHT 1600 W 23RD ST 80 917136 WILSON DANIEL A 01 201 562-6212 NOT ASSIGN 6 CAYLOR LANE 81 917008 NEWSOME WARDELL 02 201 375-6102 CHICOT 801 APPERSON 82 915610 ALESSI CHRISTINA 01 202 225-7362 ROMINE 3503 HAPPY VALLEY DR 83 915449 FOSTER LAQUSTA 02 202 562-4607 GEYER SPRGS E 57 ROSEMOORE DR 84 916766 OLIVER TIFFANY 02 202 376-3833 MABELVALE E 2518 OLIVER 85 916948 MITCHELL WILLIAM 02 203 372-3614 NOT ASSIGN 1322 W 19TH ST 86 916808 HILTON PETER 01 211 223-9513 ROMINE 3703 TUDOR 87 916950 HILL MARQUITA 02 211 375-4520 RIGHTS ELL 1306 HIGH ST #3 88 916955 ROBINSON MARCUS N 02 211 562-8739 CHICOT 11500 CHICOT RD #11 89 916066 MESKO EMILY 01 224-4566 NOT ASSIG'.1 1807 SHUMATE 90 916814 STRATFORD BRONSON 02 664-1953 BALE 5204 W 23RD ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 01 SEQ# STUDENT J,I. NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE ,. SCHOOL 91 907922 THOMAS ALTELEA 02 227-5253 ROMINE 2106 SCOTTY COURT 92 917379 LOVETT JACOB 01 565-9289 MEADOWCLIFF 43 S MEADOWCLIFF 93 912764 WEBB MICAH 03. 375-1850 ROCKEFELLER 238 E 27TH ST 94 912765 WEBB BIANCA 02 375-1850 ROCKEFELLER 238 E 27TH ST 95 908098 WEBB JUSTIN 01 565-8267 BALE 15 BELMONT 96 907032 EVERLY JEREMY 01 227-7528 ROMINE 12601 VALLEYWOOD DR -I -I W1+1 rE = I /3 L l\"r C /C... = .\ni__. SEQ# STUDENT J! rr 1 162608 2 896196 3 907328 4 909638 5 895035 6 893849 7 905526 8 890113 9 896748 10 893 613 11 893055 12 891587 13 894762 14 895199 15 896585 GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# ALLISON ROY B 02 376-0011 1600 SPARK THOMAS SHANA 02 375-9186 2 914 MARSHALL HOWARD LATOYA 02 2705 MARSHALL CAMPBELL JORDAN 02 372-3977 2115 RICE ST DOCKERY LOUIS 02 227-8193 9600 W 36TH ST COLE MISHAEL 02 372-8792 2110 RINGO SMITH JENNIFER 02 1920 CUMBERLAND #2 PHILLIPS JERMAINE 02 372-6978 1713 TULANE DAVIDSON MICHAEL 02 375-0093 1514 W 20TH ST BROWN KERISTAN 02 5620 SOUTHWICK HUNTER KOURTNEY 02 664-0278 7311 N ST BROWN JEROME 02 1803 WOLFE ALMAN LANEY 01 661-0558 41 SHERRILL HGHTS PARKER CHRISTOPHER 02 227-9956 9414 LABETTE DR FLOWERS DIONDRA 02 374-2759 1323 WRIGHT AVE SCHOOL FAIR PARK MEADOWCLIFF NOT ASSIGN NOT ASSIGN BRADY GEYER SPRGS E RIGHTSELL JEFFERSON GARLAND BASELINE JEFFERSON NOT ASSIGN FOREST PARK BOOKER MABELVALE E GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ= STUDENT .a NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE .a 1T 1T SCHOOL 16 167950 TAYLOR TERICA 02 PUL HGHTS E 1314 PARK ST 17 912289 CALDWELL KIMBERLY 02 374-7965 OTTER CREEK 1105 W 35TH ST 18 894644 RUTHERFORD MARTHA 01 663-9131 FOREST PARK 5604 HAWTHORNE 19 911562 THOMPSON MARANDA 01 562-4453 ROCKEFELLER 11 CURTIS COVE 20 896459 BLOCK TAMIKA 02 376-7205 MABELVALE E 2521 ARCH 21 894530 FOWLER KAWAN 02 375-9255 JEFFERSON 1314 W 15TH ST 22 897326 TURNER TINISHA 02 374-3604 PUL HGHTS E 3706 AMERICAN MANOR #1 23 897464 RICHMOND PETER 01 664-4612 FULBRIGHT 12721 PLEASANT FOREST DR 24 895911 LIPSCHITZ RILEY 01 666-3775 FOREST PARK 3420 HILL RD 25 907152 FARNAM JESSICA 01 225-1835 ROMINE 401 GAMBLE RD 26 894541 PRESLEY SHEMICA 02 101 661-0123 BALE 2001 SOAK 27 892203 EMBRY TEMEA 02 666-0506 BRADY 1217 ADAMS 28 894631 BROWN CORY L 01 101 225-9793 ROMINE 8922 FAIRHAVEN RD 29 894522 HUTCHISON PATSY A 02 101 374-8498 CHICOT 2709 S IZARD 30 909534 OXLEY BRANDON A 01 101 227-5023 ROMINE 16 POINT WEST CR 31 894517 WATSON ROBERT A 02 101 372-0943 DODD 1419 PULASKI ST 32 893278 SYKES BOBBY D 02 101 376-3945 MCDERMOTT 2520 BROADWAY GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ\n/ STUDENT -\" NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL \" 33 914876 BOYCE AARON 02 565-4832 CARVER 10210 STILLMAN 34 896404 ATKINSON SION 02 101 372-2162 CHICOT 3115 S IZARD 35 894542 HUNTER REBECCA 02 101 666-2492 DODD 1505 STATE #A 36 897260 BROOKS DAMIEN L 02 102 376-6667 MCDERMOTT 1302 WOLFE ST 37 893354 JOHNSON DAWON L 02 102 666-9203 FRANKLIN 1403 S VAN BUREN 38 892636 ENGRAM K',-iAN D 02 102 666-7748 BALE 1108 S HlIGHES 39 897420 FOGHT IDA P 01 102 371-0256 ROCKEFELLER 2022 CENTE 40 897298 POWELL DANIEL 02 102 375-3116 MCDERMOTT 1515 BISHOP 41 896460 PIGGEE CHERYLL 02 102 372-9320 MABELVALE E 1800 W 30TH ST 42 896625 YOUNG KELLY D 02 102 223-9084 TERRY 9116 W 35TH ST 43 894299 CROSS AKINA L 01 103 565-3909 BALE 7100 TAL'1AGE DR 44 894698 BURL WILLIAM M 02 103 664-4628 DODD 4106 W 25TH ST 45 893584 BRADLEY TERESA A 02 103 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE DR 46 896616 TOOMBS TRACIE R 02 103 376-6081 MABELVALE E 1900 RINGO 1 47 896835 HINES ADREIAN L 02 103 374-8624 CHICOT 629 CORNING GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT JI TT NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 48 894577 POINTER LANIS H 02 103 664-7956 BALE 1409 MAPLE 49 914875 BOYCE ANAIAH 02 103 565-4837 CLOVERDALE E 2 SOUTHAVEN CT #4 50 896352 GAY NEFERTAR N 02 103 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PLACE 51 897447 BIZZELL LATIFFANY 02 104 666-7816 FOREST PARK 3406 W 14TH ST 52 897309 BROWN JUSTIN 02 111 378-7816 MITCHELL 1707 CHESTER #115 53 908386 CRAIG ERIC F 02 111 666-7157 FOREST PARK 1418 S MARTIN 54 896597 JONES CEDERIC 02 111 376-2380 RIGHTS ELL 2017 GAINES UPPER 55 894410 HILL JASON W 02 111 374-1559 CARVER 1909 SCHILLER ST 56 895040 KING CHELLA K 02 111 372-4292 PUL HGHTS E 1614 W 20TH ST 57 892204 ESKRIDGE MARK 02 111 666-9167 WOODRUFF 1617 S MAPLE 58 897280 BLOCKER TONY J 02 111 374-6030 RIGHTSELL 1200 CROSS 59 894657 HAGUEWOOD RB 01 111 664-3478 FOREST PARK 5300 STONEWALL RD 60 907554 HAHN JOSHUA R 01 111 372-5963 RIGHTS ELL 209 W 14TH ST 61 898331 BLOCK REAGAN 01 111 224-7773 FRANKLIN 148 PEBBLE BEACH I 62 890498 GAINES CHANETRA 02 111 664-0881 FAIR PARK 1000 W JEFFERSON I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT Jj NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 63 897303 RICHARDSON TEMIKA 02 111 375-4477 MITCHELL 1500 CROSS 64 166993 HALE ALBERTA R 02 111 372-1262 JEFFERSON 1721 DENNISON 65 913050 ANDREWS FELICIA 02 111 BADGETT 2100 S RINGO 66 914844 KEARNEY JACKIE 01 111 663-5897 FRANKLIN 1309 S JACKSON 67 896598 JONES LADONYA 02 111 224-2813 RIGHTS ELL 11401 MESA DR #F345 68 894360 SCRIMA XANDER N 01 111 223-3130 OTTER CREEK 12316 SHAWNEE FOREST DR 69 894520 JOHNINSON MATTHEW 02 111 374-1064 FULBRIGHT 1915 MARYLAND ST 70 896028 BUTLER WHITNEY 01 111 225-2225 FRANKLIN 13510 BECKENHAM DR 71 916776 ELLIOTT CORNELIUS 02 111 562-1369 WATSON 43 WARREN DR #83 72 913518 HILL JAMARA K 02 111 661-0616 BRADY 2105 S MAPLE 73 910808 POWELL SCOTT 01 112 374-2923 FOREST PARK 315 N PARK 74 914007 WILSON RYAN C 02 112 GEYER SPRGS E 1710 WOLFE #2 75 897265 HALE KENNETH D 02 112 376-7364 RIGHTS ELL 1801 PULASKI 76 908162 NELSON BRANDI L 02 112 223-8722 TERRY 2105 SCOTTY CT 77 894331 TILLEY MARGARET 01 112 664-3349 BOOKER 301 KINGSROW #110 GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ: STUDENT .!I NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 78 911099 WYERS MARKE 01 112 374-3066 RIGHTS ELL 1614 CUMBERLAND 79 897167 MEMS ALLEN M 02 112 372-4553 ISH 1408 SCHILLER 80 909674 WARG TRISTAN 01 112 568-0735 MABELVALE E 8510 COULTER LAKE RD 81 896417 HARRIS MISTY L 02 112 374-8844 MABELVALE E 1503 WOLFE ST 82 890225 SURRATT STEPHAINE 02 112 372-1286 ROCKEFELLER 1205 GEYER 83 897324 BROWN ROCHELLE 02 113 375-4472 GEYER SPRGS E 1616 S IZARD #201 84 896777 CLAYTON SARAH 01 113 225-0756 MCDERMOTT 19 COACHLIGHT DR 85 908777 BALLARD GARY 02 113 490-2848 BADGETT 9 SHELBY CR 86 895207 TAYLOR CHRISTOPHER 02 113 771-1847 FOREST PARK 1923 W 16TH ST 87 907751 JACKSON JOHN 01 201 375-5748 ROCKEFELLER 2111 LOUISIANA 88 916686 BOWDEN MORGAN 01 203 224-1245 MCDERMOTT 1608 STONEHENGE PL 89 915822 RAYBON PAMELA A 01 204 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRELL #H2 90 894795 HALL BERNARD 01 211 225-3314 FOREST PARK 98 WHITE OAK LN 91 910268 KIMMER JILL M 01 213 227-4299 FULBRIGHT 2 CHATH~1 CT 92 916858 BRADSHAW MELISSA 01 213 565-4825 CHICOT 5804 VALLEY DR #2 GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 02 SEQ# STUDENT Jl NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 93 904461 TYSINGER AMY 01 455-4257 OTTER CREEK 18403 FAWNTREE 94 896516 FIELDS AMANDA 02 661-9090 STEPHENS 4620 W 28TH ST 95 896539 OTISI LILLIAN 02 GARLAND 4512 W 27TH ST 96 896538 OTISI BENJAMIN 02 GARLAND 4512 W 27TH ST 97 896326 WASHINGTON JANELLE 02 663-1675 BALE 1620 SPINE 98 912049 PARKER NATALIE L 02 376-9817 WAKEFIELD 916 W 16TH #201 99 907182 KRULIN KIMBERLY 01 227-8906 NOT ASSIGN 25 LONGLEA 895910 KELLER AARON 01 666-9227 FOREST PARK 5025 STONEWALL 894627 PEARSALL CATHERINE 01 666-5747 NOT ASSIGN 500 BECKWOOD II I l\nJ I-+ I T6 C: I /.3 LA C../c .::: a(_ SEQ# STUDENT 1 907433 2 164390 3 890340 4 890543 5 167324 6 891494 7 160617 8 160024 9 167715 10 163008 11 160660 12 890320 13 892480 14 907334 15 890344 # GIBBS MAGNET NAME AND ADDRESS RC FARR BRYAN 02 1212 BOOKER HARRIS ANTOINE 02 1808 MARSHALL TOOMBS MICHAEL 02 1900 RINGO DEDNER CYNTHIA 02 3314 HOLT WATSON WILLIE 02 1016 W 16TH ST PASHA KHALEELAH 02 2009 E 6TH ST COATES MIESHA 02 3002 W 14TH ST NEASLEY DOMINIQUE 02 3217 SUMMIT ANDERSON COURTNEY 02 2022 HOWARD JONES LATONYA 02 1515 BISHOP JONES LATORYA 02 1515 BISHOP PIGGEE RAYDIA 02 1406 STATE RUNYAN CARMEN 02 2312 SOAK HOWARD TAMMY 02 2705 MARSHALL WASHINGTON WILLIAM 02 910 BATTERY GRADE 03 CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 666-8762 NOT ASSIGN 378-0809 DODD 376-6081 GEYER SPRGS E 371-0199 TERRY 490-0529 MEADOWCLIFF 374-5570 DODD 664-1849 OTTER CREEK BALE 372-2840 MITCHELL 375-3116 MCDERMOTT 375-3116 MCDERMOTT 374-5350 DODD 664-4667 MCDERMOTT NOT ASSIGN 374-4179 ROMINE GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT .u Tt NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 16 895896 SMITH AARON 02 664-6145 JEFFERSON 7218 MST 17 165377 CRAVENS TIFFANY 02 224-8874 NOT ASSIGN 1801 RESERVIOR #123 18 896909 MAYHAN CYNTHIA 02 372-1032 NOT ASSIGN 621 WRIGHT AVE #3 19 907124 BAILEY SIOBBAN 02 TERRY 3804 W 5TH ST 20 167712 COLEMAN LUTHER 02 374-4930 GEYER SPRGS E 3117 S MAIN 21 892475 MOSLEY LAKEISHA 02 NOT ASSIGN 1405 W 14TH ST 22 890259 TURNER MIZZ 02 565-4513 CHICOT 17 DEE COURT 23 911243 BREWER ANTHONY 01 221-3842 CARVER 1714 JENNIFER 24 170306 TOOMBS STEPHEN 02 374-4139 DODD 1915 S WOLFE 25 SMITH STEVEN 02 371-1247 26 891889 GOSS JOHN 01 664-5538 JEFFERSON 7 LOMBARDY 27 903202 RAY CORA 01 562-4776 WATSON 7700 WOODHAVEN 28 893838 GRAHAM TOMEIKA 02 374-1106 BOOKER 916 W 16TH ST 29 909695 DEARBORN NATHAN 01 225-5162 MCDERMOTT 9008 LONGACRE 30 910659 CASS SHAWN 01 664-2031 MCDERMOTT 6900 CANTRELL #G-11 GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 I SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 162199 THOMAS JENNY 01 666-7139 FAIR PARK 213 ENGLEWOOD 32 907016 CRADDOCK ALLISON 01 224-3463 CARVER 2910 CHARTER OAK 33 890488 ADAMS CHRISTOPHER 01 664-0877 FAIR PARK 624 N TYLER 34 915723 SIEGEL BRANDON 01 455-1131 MABELVALE E 33 OLD ORCHARD 35 164786 BROWN VIRGIL 01 101 225-9793 ROMINE 8922 FAIRHAVEN RD I 36 168179 JONES CRYSTALS 02 101 664-6059 JEFFERSON 4705 W 16TH ST 37 166104 HARRIS DAMION L 01 101 666-6668 PULASKI HGTS E 1804 S MARTIN 38 890240 THOMAS BYRANT D 02 101 374-9531 MABELVALE E PO BOX 6044 39 898211 BENNETT ASHLEY 02 102 568-0702 CLOVERDALE E 5504 DREHER LN 40 168123 MARSHALL KAVIN 02 102 664-6871 MCDERMOTT 1404 S VAN BUREN 41 893850 ALLEN WALLACE 02 102 663-0408 PULASKI HGTS E 2504 STYLER 42 891639 MCCOY LYDIA 02 102 374-4272 PULASKI HGTS E 2417 MARSHALL 43 890152 HUGHES BRANDON 02 102 WILSON 2319 W 12TH ST 44 892999 HUDSON ALBERT 02 102 664-5852 DODD 4116 W 22ND ST I I I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 I SEQ# STUDENT Ji NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T I 45 891492 MAYWEATHER BRIDGETTE 02 102 376-1461 CHICOT 505 FLETCHER 46 890455 GAY KEONA M 02 103 374-7487 CHICOT I 50 KIRSPEL 47 163006 WHEELER DAMON 02 103 375-2739 PULASKI HGTS E 1410 S MARSHALL I 48 890223 WALKER ANIKA D 02 103 374-0985 MEADOWCLIFF 1303 COLLEGE II 50 896850 PALMER ASHLEY 01 103 224-4494 ROMINE 32 OLD FORGE CT 51 893579 BRADLEY TRAMAYNE 02 103 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE DR 52 890465 KELLEY MAURICE 02 103 372-3724 CHICOT II 36 E KIRSPEL 53 170299 SHARP SAMATHA 02 103 375-8978 OTTER CREEK 1854 SUMMIT II 54 911100 YOUNG PAUL J 02 103 376-4324 MABELVALE E 2612 BISHOP ST - 55 164599 PARKER KIANA 02 104 OTTER CREEK 3101 CENTER ST - 56 890376 JOHNSON CALVIN 02 104 568-0366 DODD 5611 OLD HICKORY RD 57 890502 HARVEY CYNARA 02 111 664-0881 FAIR PARK II 1000 JEFFERSON ST 58 893854 NELSON BRYANT D 02 111 376-2874 TERRY II 1812 W 14TH ST 59 891925 SHELLS MICHELLE 02 111 661-9363 OAK GROVE E 2421 S OAK I 60 89312 MADYUN AADIL 02 111 666-8363 MEADOW CLIFF 5112 W 30TH ST II I II I I II GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 I SEQ# STUDENT .jj rr NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I 61 912908 DIEMER KAREN 01 111 224-7442 ROMINE 4023 S SHACKLEFORD #148 62 890124 MACK ROGER 02 111 375-4261 BRADY II 1801 DENNISON 63 162200 VINES CHAVONNE 02 111 663-4520 JEFFERSON 7203 INDIANA II 64 890961 GARRISON TERRENCE 02 111 374-2901 MEADOWCLIFF 1322 ROCK #A II 65 900762 HILTON ABIGAIL 01 111 455-4555 ROMINE 3703 TUDOR II 66 890281 DAWSON MUNIR 02 111 374-2868 GEYER SPRGS E 2623 STATE 67 890324 KENNEDY JOSHUA 01 111 225-9785 FOREST PARK II 8801 LONGACRE 68 167279 SCOTT LATRINA 02 111 374-0656 MABELVALE E II 35 WHITMORE CR 69 890547 LANIGAN LEROY 02 111 568-8173 CHICOT 11500 CHICOT RD #103 II 70 890109 MONTGOMERY STEVEN 02 111 666-3588 FAIR PARK 1902 S HARRISON II 71 890541 SETTLES SHAUNA L 02 111 376-2034 MITCHELL 1804 S CROSS II 72 894651 HENSON WINFRED w 02 112 661-9236 FAIR PARK 3407 W 12TH ST 73 890533 GUPTON YASHIKA 02 112 374-9399 MITCHELL II 1220 RINGO 74 159818 GRANT HORACE B 02 112 661-9637 BALE 4805 W 29TH ST II 75 913494 FORD DERAN M 02 112 565-2939 CLOVERDALE E 42 S WAKEFIELD DR -Ill I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 SEQ# STUDENT JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 76 896945 MITCHELL ROBERT 01 112 562-5155 WILSON 1812 RESERVOIR RD #292 77 890308 FLEMING ELIZABETH A 01 112 661-1758 FOREST PARK 5405 SHERWOOD 78 891811 MITCHELL TRENA 02 113 376-2563 BRADY 1913 BRAGG ST 79 915856 GILLMORE CARLOS 02 113 MABELVALE E 909 WELCH 80 907527 COLEMAN MEREDETH 02 201 663-9604 WILSON 3005 ASHER 81 910366 LUISTRO JAIME R 04 201 664-6077 BALE 118 BROADMOOR DR 82 915461 FREDERICK KELLY 01 203 224-0159 NOT ASSIGN 38 INVERNESS 83 915869 SMITH SHAQUITA 02 203 WESTERN HILLS 1306 LOUISIANA 84 893545 VICKERS STEPHEN 01 211 225-1143 FOREST PARK ~ 8100 CANTRELL #1001 85 916875 THURMAN TODD 01 212 FULBRIGHT 1875 A CLICK PL ~ 86 915871 D'AREZZO JAMES 01 213 224-9208 FULBRIGHT 3119 ECHO VALLEY DR - 87 170294 MOSS NATRASHA 02 663-7969 MABELVALE E 2719 CROSS 88 899941 FORTENBERRY ANNA 01 227-6019 BRADY I 9 CAPE COD 89 898324 BLAYLOCK JEREMY 01 225-4693 FULBRIGHT Ill 1 CORAL 90 896926 BROWN CARRIE 01 565-6852 WESTERN HILLS 4908 WESTWOOD II II I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 03 SEQ # STUDENT .!L TT NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE # SCHOOL 91 916298 WILSON JEREMY 01 224-0810 MCDERMOTT 11433 BAINBRIDGE DR 92 916135 STEWART CATHERINE 01 664-2173 FOREST PARK 1220 N GARFIELD 93 899756 EVERLY ASHLEY 01 227-7528 ROMINE 12601 VALLEYWOOD DR 94 918636 USSERY GREGORY 02 375-7022 MEADOWCLIFF 3601 W 29TH ST VJ /-I I r-E -= I /3 '-~ C-,C .:: oL SEQ# STUDENT 1 909639 2 896502 3 891461 4 163906 5 162962 6 160612 7 892489 8 904805 9 909696 10 155766 11 160759 12 153744 13 901321 14 907103 15 162344 .II TT GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL BRUNSON KEVIN 02 372-3977 NOT ASSIGN 2115 S RICE SYKES RESHENA 02 375-9301 NOT ASSIGN 3316 SPRING LAWSON MARRECA 02 565-3976 OTTER CREEK 9115 MANN RD #1 CLAY KESHA 02 374-5618 RIGHTS ELL 1860 RINGO JONES MARKESHA 02 376-3806 WAKEFIELD 2810 SUMMIT BOGARD SHERNETTA 02 661-1832 GEYER SPRGS E 2715 MARSHALL MABRIE BRETT 02 666-9005 NOT ASSIGN 1015 W 15TH ST WHITFIELD TIMBUTA 02 562-4313 MCDERMOTT 1221 RESERVOIR DEARBORN WESLEY 01 225-5162 NOT ASSIGN 9008 LONGACRE JACKSON JOHNNY 02 374-4721 DODD 1402 W 13TH ST COOPER LEE 02 565-0233 WILSON 8224 W 41ST ST KIMBLE CARDALIA 02 663-3281 FULBRIGHT 3108 W 14TH ST JONES SHANNON 02 568-8054 OTTER CREEK 9313 TIMBER VALLEY #9 WARD INAS 02 375-0433 MITCHELL 2301 BATTERY NAGEL ALLISON 01 666-0060 FOREST PARK 5411 CENTERWOOD I II SEQ# 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STUDENT .u 1t 911956 162087 913610 908335 162379 157412 161047 166873 904848 159699 159802 161025 GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# GOMEZ GAIDA 01 227-4389 ROTHBERG SHIRA 01 2700 N GRANT SULLENGER ROBERT 01 224-3248 7620 W HARMON LAMBERT CAROLYN 01 758-7240 223-2618 ROSS SAMUEL 01 664-8225 2185 VALENTINE WILLIAMS AHMUN 02 101 224-5763 2123 LABETTE MANOR DR FOTI FLETCHER 01 666-1897 5018 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD JONES JOY 02 378-0842 2220 W 2ND ST DEAN DANIEL 01 663-3531 218 BEECHWOOD BOYCE ANTHONY 01 565-4837 HARRIS AUBREY 01 224-7713 9 NEW HAVEN CT WILKERSON REBECCA 02 101 568-4051 8804 HERRICK LN EVERHART MICHAEL 02 101 372-4054 1517 CENTER #4 JONES LAVENIA 02 101 376-2380 2017 GAINES HEDRICK JOSEPH 01 101 371-9871 2109 LLOYD SCHOOL NOT ASSIGN FOREST PARK (W) (H) PULASKI HGTS E MCDERMOTT FOREST PARK GEYER SPRGS E NOT ASSIGN FRANKLIN DODD DODD MABELVALE E WOODRUFF GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT Jl NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE Jl TT TT SCHOOL 31 167519 GILLESPIE BYRON 02 101 JEFFERSON 2319 W 18TH ST 32 155803 PICKETT HENRY 02 101 372-2162 CHICOT 3115 S IZARD 33 166943 TURNER ROTRENNIA 02 102 225-2391 DODD 1310 BATTERY #2 34 156961 GAY NICHOLE 02 103 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL 35 163178 DUNN BROOKE 02 103 562-2290 MEADOWCLIFF 7 LAMONT 36 914874 BOYCE CECIL 02 103 565-4837 CLOVERDALE E 2 SOUTHAVEN CT 37 160027 GREENWOOD TAMARA G 02 103 372-2686 DODD 1901 BATTERY ST 38 157400 SHARP AMBER 02 103 375-8978 OTTER CREEK 1854 SUMMIT 39 153992 SHAVIS BRODERICK 02 103 375-4342 ROCKEFELLER 1315 COLLEGE 40 915289 DAVIS TAMEKA 02 103 562-9402 WAKEFIELD 6119 BUTLER RD #Dl3 41 160021 HUGHES KHOMEINI 02 103 375-2631 MEADOWCLIFF 1219 WELCH 42 167110 GAY TAMEIKA 02 103 372-4848 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PL 43 153397 HARRIS JANICE 02 103 663-2954 MCDERMOTT 116 SOUTH MONROE 44 161019 GRAY SALONICA 02 103 663-9672 PULASKI HGTS E 3918 W 11TH ST 45 163886 BRADLEY TANESHA 02 103 MCDERMOTT 108 MONROE DR GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT .u NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 46 156962 GAY TINA S 02 103 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL 47 914902 BRADLEY SHEMEKA 02 103 562-7170 CHICOT 7714 MOORE RD 48 167113 POINTER CRYSTELL 02 104 664-4410 BALE 1409 MAPLE 49 163885 NEWSOME MARQUETTA 02 104 663-3554 OTTER CREEK 2014 S SCHILLER 50 161390 HONORABLE DAVID 02 111 374-8003 JEFFERSON 1619 WOLFE 51 902723 OJUKWU GABRIEL 02 111 562-1365 OTTER CREEK 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON #B21 52 913614 YOUNG LAKESHA 02 111 372-4055 FRANKLIN 2703 WOLFE 53 161636 ROYSTER CHRIS 02 111 374-4676 FULBRIGHT 900 W 16TH ST 54 898332 BLOCK RYAN 01 111 224-7773 FRANKLIN 148 PEBBLE BEACH 55 167534 YOUNG CHRISTOPHER 02 111 666-4715 MCDERMOTT 5016 W 11TH ST 56 894817 FIELDS LAURA 01 111 376-8044 PULASKI HGTS E 126 RIVERSIDE DR 57 164137 WAGNER JENNIFER 01 111 227-7805 FRANKLIN 1517 JENNEFER 58 908909 ROBINSON BILLY 02 111 372-7863 MABELVALE E 34 HATFIELD 59 162053 HILL BRANDON 01 111 225-3544 MCDERMOTT 8822 OLD SPANISH TRAIL 60 892027 SHINE LATOYA 02 111 565-1404 TERRY 8223 W 40TH ST GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT .u NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 61 157417 KING TIFFANY 02 111 372-4292 PULASKI HGTS E 1614 W 20TH ST 62 153745 BAKER KENNEDY 02 111 376-2801 MEADOWCLIFF 2805 S RINGO 63 902724 OJUKWU MAGNUS 02 111 562-1365 OTTER CREEK 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON B21 64 164518 GUY CHADWICK 02 111 661-1202 JEFFERSON 2412 W 18TH ST 65 161637 ROYSTER KRYSTAL 02 111 374-4676 FULBRIGHT 900 W 16TH ST 66 892303 FLANIGAN TAMEKA 02 111 374-8130 BASELINE 1603 CHESTER #215 67 166669 BEACHBOARD JOHN T 01 112 224-5205 MCDERMOTT 15 COACHLIGHT 68 913929 ALLEN CEDRIC 02 112 565-4165 CLOVERDALE E 9817 JUNIPER 69 160567 WASHINGTON TERRICK 02 112 664-5047 JEFFERSON 74 MONROE DR #108 70 915948 LAWHON LESLIE 01 112 758-4447 MEADOWCLIFF 7319 DENISE DR 71 157406 PORTER QIANA 02 113 562-4938 DODD 3 RIATA 72 165807 LAVENDER LILAC 01 113 374-2811 FRANKLIN 223 RICE 73 167290 SMITH KANGLEITA 02 113 375-4703 BAKER 3023 MARSHALL 74 916338 COLLIE WILLIAM 01 201 MCDERMOTT 8 FLINTWOOD 75 910363 LUISTRO AARON 04 201 664-6077 BALE 118 BROADMOOR DR GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 04 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 76 915821 RAYBON JULIE 01 204 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRE #H2 77 915659 MCALISTER LOUISE 01 211 663-5526 JEFFERSON 2214 DURWOOD 78 916690 VICKERS MATTHEW 01 211 225-1143 FOREST PARK I 8100 CANTRELL #1001 79 916063 MESKO BRIAN 01 224-4566 FOREST PARK 1807 SHUMATE 80 159213 THOMSEN MARK 01 225-8648 MCDERMOTT 2115 BRECKENRIDGE 81 905170 ZINAMON MICHAEL 02 562-9381 CLOVERDALE E 7511 AZALEA I 82 902205 MCPHERSON MARK 01 455-0898 OTTER CREEK 242 SILVERMAPLE 83 164355 MOSS JEFFERY 02 374-1784 MABELVALE E I 2719 CROSS 84 165734 NELSON COREY 02 224-0164 FOREST PARK 2917 DOREST DR I 85 917548 WEST SHANA L 01 374-3304 WOODRUFF 105 DENNISON 86 911956 ROTHBERG SHIRA 01 NOT ASSIGN 2700 N GRANT I 87 165740 DAVIS KASI R 02 224-9437 TERRY 9600 W 36TH ST #504 88 892407 AKKAD NADA 06 565-2373 WESTERN HILLS I 6603 ASHER #25 Ill II II II GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 I SEQ# STUDENT Jl 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 167673 BELL MARTISHA 02 374-9140 NOT ASSIGN 1517 W 17TH ST 2 158393 WENGER AARON 01 227-5381 JEFFERSON I 18 HAYFIELD 3 910320 JONES KHALED 02 NOT ASSIGN 13700 EDGEMOND 4 910662 CASS JEDDIAH 01 664-2031 BALE 6900 CANTRELL #Gll I 5 912850 VINSON ASHLEY 01 224-8624 NOT ASSIGN 11810 PLEASANT RIDGE #1402 I 6 903952 SPICKES LISA 01 565-9137 ROCKEFELLER 9 CURTIS COVE I 7 911824 BROWN BRANDY 01 221-3765 NOT ASSIGN 9201 KANIS #1-D 8 913686 CRAN KATHERINE 01 664-8387 PULASKI HGTS E I 6505 CANTRELL 9 150976 WARREN BYRON 02 374-4029 MCDERMOTT 4322 W 28TH ST Ill 10 892900 MURPHY SAM 01 371-0720 WILLIAMS 1912 S CENTER - 11 161281 WARREN ROSE 02 101 661-0581 PULASKI HGTS E 3712 MARYLAND Ill 12 165325 SMITH KEVAN 02 101 377-3613 DODD 916 W 16TH ST #305 13 159918 DUNLAP ANTHONY 02 101 JEFFERSON II 2319 W 18TH ST 14 161477 STEWART TARYN 02 101 225-6033 FULBRIGHT Ill 11220 BAINBRIDGE DR 15 915183 HAYES SONDRA 02 101 376-4404 FAIR PARK 1710 BISHOP I I I I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 I SEQ# STUDENT JI 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I 16 894843 FINNEY LAMONICA 02 101 663-3438 JEFFERSON 1760 BARROW RD #114 17 164592 BENTON KEANNA 02 101 372-2076 CHICOT I 2923 STATE 18 916224 MILTON ELIZABETH 01 101 227-4100 JEFFERSON I 123 VALLEY CLUB CR 19 155757 ALBRIGHT DE ' KOREY 02 102 372-0428 MABELVALE E 3010 HIGH ST I 20 153931 EVERHART RONALD 02 102 376-1550 MABELVALE E 221 E 28TH ST Ill 21 898224 BENNETT SHAUN 02 102 568-0702 CLOVERDALE E 5504 DREHER Ill 22 159708 MITCHELL KEDRIN 02 102 DODD 1406 STATE #1 23 155741 SHEPHERD RICARDO 02 102 BRADY II 2217 HARRISON 24 151944 TURNER LATESHA 02 102 225-2391 DODD 1310 BATTERY #2 II 25 901123 JOHNSON CAITLIN 01 102 376-3021 FULBRIGHT 5 FOREST MAPLE CT - 26 913126 BEASLEY CHRISTOPHER 02 102 375-6199 FAIR PARK 1803 BATTERY - 27 161712 STAGGERS ANDREA 02 103 666-7782 DODD 2600 SOAK 28 164200 BURK JAMES 01 103 224-0265 TERRY II 10910 BRECKENRIDGE DR 29 163127 BURL SHANDRAIL 02 103 490-0484 DODD I 4106 W 25TH ST 30 160942 YOUNG CASEY L 01 103 562-8954 WOODRUFF 25 GLENDALE II -- GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT .u NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL TT 31 160241 PASHA ZARIFA 02 103 374-5570 MEADOWCLIFF 2009 E 6TH ST 32 162865 FLOOD CHOCA 02 103 374-4510 DODD 1316 W 13TH ST 33 163190 GAINES MONICA 02 103 666-3797 MCDERMOTT 917 JEFFERSON 34 911101 YOUNG SHANNON 02 103 376-4324 MABELVALE E 2612 BISHOP 35 157339 ARMSTRONG ALEXA 02 104 375-2649 OTTER CREEK 2210 SUMMIT 36 157335 SPENCER ELETA 02 104 374-1170 BALE 2014 S SCHILLER 37 162256 TWYFORD MATTHEW 01 111 661-1945 FOREST PARK 1905 N TYLER 38 155722 WALLS SALYNTHIA 02 111 664-8698 FULBRIGHT 3420 W 10TH ST 39 896388 COLLINS JAMIE 02 111 DODD 417 E 17TH ST 40 155644 WIMBERLY ERICA 02 111 375-4625 CHICOT 3601 HIGH 41 157421 BAKER ANTIONIO 02 111 376-2801 FAIR PARK 2805 RINGO 42 156397 BROOKS ANTONIO 02 111 376-9445 FULBRIGHT 1415 S SCHILLER 43 891044 EGGERS SALLY 01 111 225-6758 FRANKLIN 1801 JENNIFER 44 160944 BEASLEY TREMAYNE 02 111 664-6276 BRADY 2106 S VALMAR 45 153395 DAVIS JAN 02 111 663-8974 BRADY 1318 S PIERCE GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT J.I TT NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 46 896561 JAMES GREGORY 02 111 375-1354 RIGHTS ELL 1604 IZARD #209 47 910702 MOUGEOT JESSICA 01 111 666-6635 FOREST PARK 14 ARROW RIDGE CT 48 158472 TIMS MARIO 02 111 225-5223 FULBRIGHT 1412 W 14TH ST 49 158388 LOVELACE TERRY 02 111 374-4044 MABELVALE E 23 WHITMORE 50 161038 LAWSON MIA 02 111 661-9363 OAK GROVE 2421 SOAK 51 161374 SANDERS NATOSHA 02 111 372-2501 PULASKI HGTS E 924 RICE 52 891880 SETTLES JEFFERY 02 111 376-2034 MITCHELL 1804 CROSS #A 53 893272 LYONS ANTHONY 02 111 372-3304 PULASKI HGTS E 615 W 13TH ST 54 159532 BROWN MELISSA 01 111 225-9793 WILLIAMS 8922 FAIRHAVEN RD 55 166885 DAWSON JALAL 02 111 376-4425 GEYER SPRGS E 2623 STATE 56 151384 HEDRICK JASON 01 111 371-9871 FAIR PARK 2109 LLOYD CT 57 157347 TOOMBS PHILLIP 02 112 374-4441 BOOKER 2201 HOWARD 58 903475 ROWE TAMARA 01 112 568-5346 CLOVERDALE E 8309 KEATS DR 59 158462 PALMER LAMONT 02 112 661-1274 BOOKER 2705 S FILLMORE 60 160666 PLANT DANNETTE 02 112 225-6596 MABELVALE E 1319 JR DEPUTY RD Ill I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 SEQ# STUDENT JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL lt 61 162285 VILLINES MEREDITH 01 112 664-8434 PULASKI HGTS E 38 SHERRILL HEIGHTS 62 166721 ODEM JACK 02 112 374-8844 MABELVALE E 1503 WOLFE 63 903988 STAMPS KHARI N 02 113 565-0672 BASELINE 10 ROCCO DR 64 897855 ALEXANDER TIMOTHY 01 113 568-1261 DODD 8105 SOPHIA DR 65 159560 MITCHELL TRISA 02 113 376-2563 BRADY 1913 BRAGG 66 158204 RANDOLPH WILLIAM 02 113 227-5398 MCDERMOTT 1601 GLENDA DR 67 898061 BALLARD LAURA 02 113 490-2848 BADGETT 9 SHELBY CR 68 915187 RIGBY KELLY A 02 113 758-1977 TERRY 1012 N OAKS LN 69 162252 MILLER MATHEW M 01 201 664-9220 FAIR PARK 2512 N TAYLOR 70 916161 BLACK ANDREW 01 203 568-2401 FRANKLIN 18 BERKSHIRE 71 916683 BOWDEN CULLEN 01 203 224-1245 MCDERMOTT 1608 STONEHENGE 72 916461 PICCOLO MARISSA 01 204 661-5806 PULASKI HGTS E 4301 W MARKHAM SLOT #632 73 899794 FAULKNER RICHARD 01 204 224-3171 ROMINE 6 SOUTH SWEET BAY COURT 74 162276 NIPPER ABIGAIL 01 211 664-4912 FOREST PARK 1906 N TYLER 75 901777 LONG FELICIA 02 490-0352 SHERWOOD 6 LONGSTREET DR GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 05 I SEQ# STUDENT .u 1T NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL I 76 160290 KING ALGIE 02 374-3568 PULASKI HGTS E 2111 BRAGG I 77 918119 CRAIG RANDALL 01 664-2480 FAIR PARK 2505 KAVANAUGH 78 153779 USSERY MICHEAL 02 375-7022 MEADOWCLIFF 3601 W 29TH ST W\n--1/re-- = I I 4 \u0026lt;-/I C..../c. = ,2__, - GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 06 -SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 157237 MARBLEY DAMON 02 376-2130 OTTER CREEK 1909 S BATTERY 2 151943 STRAW TAMELA 02 375-0533 NOT ASSIGN 1423 WOLFE 3 156743 MARTINDALE REGINALD 02 374-7229 NOT ASSIGN 1419 S RINGO 4 154370 KELLEY TORREY 02 374-3866 WAKEFIELD 2010 MARSHALL 5 150906 JONES CHARLES 02 NOT ASSIGN 2914 ARCH 6 158075 WILLIAMS DAWN 02 227-5891 ROMINE 10008 SUFFOLK 7 912248 BRANT MELISSA 01 568-3192 WAKEFIELD 10114 PROSPECT LP 8 160411 TOOMBS BRIAN 02 562-4853 BALE 3946 ARAPHO TRAIL 9 901333 JONES VICTORIA 02 568-8054 OTTER CREEK 9313 TIMBER VALLEY DR #197 10 913075 BARKINS NATASHA 02 568-6164 WATSON 3930 WOOD DALE DR 11 150100 FALLICA KELLY 01 568-6016 GEYER SPRGS E 9 WOODSON CT #A 12 892058 BULTER BROOKE 01 225-2225 FRANKLIN 13510 BECKENHAM DR 13 896245 WILSON BRYAN 02 664-4107 BALE 1620 SPINE 14 151816 MCCOY ANTHONY 02 375-4871 FULBRIGHT 1720 BISHOP 15 151815 JONES ROY 02 372-6243 FULBRIGHT 1409 WOLFE I - GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 06 I SEQ# STUDENT -\" NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL Tt II 16 156395 BLUE CEDRIC 02 375-6931 MITCHELL 2422 MARSHALL I 17 157452 HARP JENNIFER 01 225-9396 FULBRIGHT 13501 POMPANO DR 18 158059 PEYTON CHANDRA 02 224-7754 WILSON 3303 DOREST 19 904733 WELLS EDWARD 01 568-0982 WAKEFIELD 5001 W 65TH ST #102E 20 158073 WASHINGTON CHARITA 02 224-2643 ROMINE 3001 LENNOX 21 914393 SADOWSKI JENNIFER 01 223-8001 FULBRIGHT 11520 SOUTHRIDGE 22 ROBERTS SARAH 982-9194 666-8686 23 914954 DAVIS CHERYLN 01 455-1506 RIGHTS ELL 1180 VINY RIDGE 24 158238 WILLIAMS LIBBY 01 224-4843 JEFFERSON 8 214 REYMERE 25 153218 DEAN WILLIAM 01 455-4412 NOT ASSIGN 13600 OTTER CREEK #140 26 141490 WATKINS ROSHONDA 02 101 372-7500 OTTER CREEK 2214 S SCHILLER 27 156402 JAMES CRAIG A 02 101 375-8366 OTTER CREEK 2018 SCHILLER 28 159511 ROWE FREDRICK 02 101 CHICOT 2428 SCHILLER 29 158424 COOPER ANGELA 02 101 374-6123 DODD 1820 PULASKI 30 897726 DAVIS SAL'1MY 02 101 374-2453 DODD 1108 S CHESTER GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 06 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE J! 1t SCHOOL 31 152507 ROBINSON NAKIA 02 102 MABELVALE E 1916 LOUISIANA 32 156979 BOZEMAN TOMEKIA 02 102 664-8627 MCDERMOTT 7404 BRIARWOOD 33 901187 JOHNSON NATHAN 01 102 376-3021 FULBRIGHT 5 FOREST MAPLE CT 34 892850 THOMAS DERRICK 02 102 374-6148 MABELVALE E 910 W 24TH ST 35 153696 THOMAS LASONYA 02 102 375-0774 MABELVALE E 3308 MARSHALL 36 152472 GAY GORETTA 02 103 374-7487 CHICOT 50 KIRSPEL PL 37 154933 BUTLER SHANDELYN 02 103 666-614 7 FAIR PARK 2119 S HARRISON 38 894348 JAMES TONYA 02 103 223-9084 TERRY 9116 W 35TH ST 39 157244 ARMSTRONG KARLOSTENA 02 104 375-5135 OTTER CREEK 2210 S SUMMIT 40 151949 WRIGHT KEVIN 02 111 374-6030 RIGHTS ELL 1200 CROSS 41 157874 MITCHELL CHARLES F 02 111 225-7653 FOREST PARK 3019 ECHO VALLEY DR - 42 160898 EDWARDS JEANITTA S 02 111 376-7060 BRADY 118 N BATTERY 43 159765 ROBINSON ROBBIE 02 111 376-2593 BOOKER - 1413 W 15TH ST 44 154516 JONES TEMEKKA 02 111 568-1084 DODD - 5609 OLD HICKORY RD 45 159512 ROWE FELICIA 02 111 663-9109 CHICOT 4416 W MARYLAND -I I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 06 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 46 158405 ONEAL JESSE P 01 111 663-2533 BOOKER 2615 FLAKEWOOD 47 905188 MCFEE RAUSHANAH A 02 111 565-4203 WAKEFIELD 9325 DANA LN 48 896397 COLLINS DARON 02 111 DODD 417 E 17TH ST 49 900763 HILTON ZACHARY 01 111 455-4555 ROMINE 3703 TUDOR 50 153718 HAWKINS WILLIAM 02 111 663-8704 PULASKI HGTS E 1512 SOAK 51 157261 KING SAMUEL D 02 111 372-4292 PULASKI HGTS E 1614 W 20TH ST 52 149974 WILLIAMS SANDRA 02 111 372-4505 BRADY 3022 GAINES 53 152912 DAVIS ASHLEY 02 111 663-8974 BRADY 1318 S PIERCE 54 158042 ISUM TENESHA 02 112 227-6012 TERRY 1915 KIMBERLY DR 55 156805 JOHNSON DARLENE 02 112 FOREST PARK 904 ALLIS 56 161616 RELEFORD LASHONE 02 112 375-5199 MCDER11OTT 3319 WOLFE Ill 57 916568 CUMMINGS MEREDITH 01 112 666-4235 FAIR PARK 5404 STONEWALL I 58 166720 HARRIS KIMONO T 02 112 374-8844 MABELVALE E 1503 WOLFE ST 59 154460 SMITH JAMEESHA 02 113 562-1089 WILSON I 6101 QUEENSBORO DR #A 60 916879 LINDSEY LLEWELLYN 01 201 455-0300 ROMINE 13017 LEMONCREST LN II I I GIBBS MAGNET GRADE 06 SEQ# STUDENT JI NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1T 61 910365 LUISTRO ANTHONY 04 201 664-6077 BALE 118 BROADMOOR DR 62 917266 COFFEY JOLEE M 01 201 227-0393 NOT ASSIGN 9519 LABETTE DR 63 915551 COOK CHARLA M 01 203 225-9382 ROMINE 8 WALNUT VALLEY 64 898286 BLACK ALLISON 01 203 568-2401 FRANKLIN 18 BERKSHIRE 65 898288 BLACK ASHLEY 01 203 568-2401 FRANKLIN 18 BERKSHIRE 66 915820 RAYBON JILL 01 204 664-3329 FOREST PARK 6900 CANTRELL #H2 67 915653 GRAY ALLISON 01 204 568-1397 CLOVERDALE E 7315 AZALEA 68 THOMAS BRIAN 02 568-4853 69 155655 GUIDEN IAN L 02 374-4853 WOODRUFF 2808 IZARD 70 DAILEY MICHAEL 01 562-3416 227-6771 71 917211 CRAIG WILLIAM 666-3542 FAIR PARK 2505 KAVANAUGH II 72 918484 THOMPSON DAMIAN 01 562-3702 WESTERN HILLS 8607 COMMUNITY I 73 916299 WILSON SANDI 02 224-0810 MCDERMOTT 11433 BAINRIDGE I   WILLIAMS 43 GRADE 00 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 1 915422 JAN DAVID 1 201 664-8345 PULASKI HGTS E 8 AMARILLO CR 2 915710 BRANSON BLAKE 1 201 221-3428 MCDERMOTT 1914 BISCAYNE 3 916346 VAN HOOSE STEPHANIE 5 201 562-0862 WATSON 9914 CARRIE LANE 4 915674 ULMSCHNEIDER ASHLEY 1 201 224-4602 MCDERMOTT 3 OLD FORGE CT 5 915840 HENRY LAUREN 1 201 664-6762 BRADY 7502 CHOCTAW RD 6 916380 HENRY RY\n..N 1 201 663-5126 BRADY 6908 BL't\n:C:BIRD 7 915272 MCELRATH JOHN 1 201 221-1030 MCDERMOTT 7 LEAWOOD 8 915517 HOLLAND MATTHEW 1 201 224-2955 MCDERMOTT 8808 BOULDER LN 9 916099 TILLMAN JESSICA 2 201 375-1938 MABELVALE 1604 IZARD APT 109 10 915519 FULMER l\u0026lt;1\"~.RK 1 201 568-7305 MEADOWCLIFF 36 LAMONT 11 916103 JOHNSON CHARLES 2 201 ivESTERN HILLS 3822 WEST 27TH ST I 12 916476 HARTSTEI~I COURTNY 1 201 664-0251 HALL 3 0 PINE :A.ANOR DR II 13 916557 NESBITT SHAYLA 1 201 753-8314 NOT ASSIGNED 5732 CAMP ROBINSON RD BLD 1-2 14 916628 WILLIAMS DERRICK 2 201 223-8321 WILLSON I 3013 VANCOUVER DR 15 916644 PATRICK ANTHONY 2 201 562-6243 BASELINE  5813 BAS:::LINE RD APT 238    WILLIAMS 43 GRADE 00  SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE # SCHOOL  16 916697 FINKBEINER LINDSEY 1 201 227-9861 BRADY 4 PORTLAND  17 917283 LONG SHANE 1 201 223-9345 PARKVIEW 8101 CANTRELL RD APT 1703 18 915240 MCCUIEN HOWARD 2 202 562-9925 MCDERMOTT 1505 SCHILLER 19 915479 CHAN ANN 1 202 224-0838 FRANKLIN 19 ELK RUN COVE 20 915300 SANDERS WILLIAM 1 202 227-6726 FULBRIGHT 7 CAPE COO 21 915412 BULLOCH JUSTIN 1 202 565-1741 WILSON 3 SOUTHMONT CR 22 916460 JANATI KAMIAR 1 202 664-6522 FAIR PARK 236 KINGS ROW 23 916268 HOLLOWAY MIKEL 2 202 224-1922 TERRY 2109 ROMINE RD 24 917091 HEAD MICHAEL 1 202 664-4077 BALE 64 GLENMERE 25 915785 LAMB THEODORE 1 202 225-3863 ROMINE 9006 CLOVERHILL 26 916054 TONEY TRESSA 2 204 375-2106 BRADY 1917 MAIN APT B 27 915531 ELGEN JOHNNY 1 204 562-7667 GEYER SPGS 4725 HOFFMAN APT 7 28 916635 GILES NATHAN 1 204 666-6753 HALL 7201 KENTUCKY APT 5 29 916379 HENDERSON ALAN 1 211 221-3267 JEFFERSotT 8308 LEATRICE DR 30 915348 GALLEGOS JEFFERY 1 211 22~-3263 MCDERMOTT 2607 GRIST MILL WILLIAMS 43 GRADE 00 SEQ= STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 31 915414 D'AUTEUIL MILDRED 1 211 227-7145 FULBRIGHT 11903 DESOTO FOREST DR 32 916098 BEZET ERIN 1 211 663-1969 BRADY 920 N BRYAN 33 915480 HALL WHITNEY 1 211 227-9683 FULBRIGHT 22 CIMARRON VALLEY CR 34 916258 TENNER DAVID 2 211 224-0945 ROMINE 2215 ROMINE RD 35 915411 JACKSON JENNIFER 1 211 663-6585 HALL 7424 ILLINOIS 36 916240 WILLIAMS DAVID 1 211 663-5394 FAIR PAR:\u0026lt;: 5901 WOODLAWN 37 916264 STONE STEPHANIE 1 211 225-4948 BALE 2522 QUEBEC DR 38 916256 PHILLIPS ANTONY 1 211 224-1924 FULBRIGH:' 10815 CRESTDALE LN 39 915315 DAHMS MATTHEW 1 211 224-8813 FULBRIG!--i:' 504 SPRINGWOOD 40 905423 PRICE MARIANNE 1 211 661-1243 FOREST P\n\u0026gt;..RK 516 N FILLMORE 41 915516 LOWITZ I.AURIE 1 211 224-0636 BOOKER 1613 SHUMATE 42 916367 STARNES KATIE 1 211 TERRY 1701 CENTERVIEW APT 200 43 916273 PRINCE DAVID 1 211 225-7475 HALL 8118 W ~..ARKHAM APT 118 44 916014 YOUNGBLOOD BYRON 1 211 666-7615 FRANKLI~ 5400 W 30TH ST 45 916248 MICHALES AARON 1 211 663-8777 FULBRIGE-:- 624 PINE VALLEY I WILLIAMS 43 GRADE 00 I SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHONE# SCHOOL 46 916052 ROBINSON LAURA 1 211 663-1038 PULASKI HGTS E 604 NORTH OAK 47 916087 SPENCER LAUREN 1 211 224-3277 TERRY 8 SWEETGUM CT 48 915534 PARKS ELIZABETH 1 211 225-3543 MCDERMOTT 10218 RONALD DR 49 915885 WILKERSON BROOKE 1 211 663-8223 JEFFERSON 2027 N GARFIELD 50 916042 GANTT ROSHANDTA 2 211 576-8419 JEFFERSON 2509 W 13TH II 51 916239 FASULES LINDSEY 1 211 224-9410 BRADY 13821 ST CHARLES BLVD I 52 915299 SQUIRE R 1 211 661-9506 HALL 6521 CANTRELL RD 53 915394 VADEN OLIVIA 1 211 224-7714 TERRY I 4 CONVERTRY LN 54 915554 BOYCE DEREK 1 211 664-4814 HALL II 3817 W 10TH 55 916221 BENSON JAY R 1 211 663-7294 FARI PARK 114 PEARL APT A I 56 908331 GRAY PRISCILLA 1 211 663-7448 PULASKI HGTS E 7305 KENTUCKY APT A I 57 915354 GRAY NATHAN 1 211 227-0633 HALL 3 LORINE CR I 58 915629 JAMERSON TYSON 2 211 661-9245 FAIR PARK 4307 1/2 MARYLAND 59 916219 JOHNSON CHENARA 2 211 568-6145 WATSON I 10424 REPUBLIC LN 60 916127 THOMAS BILLIE 2 211 221-3322 TERRY 11503 JAMESTOWN DR I I I WILLIAMS 43 GRADE 00 SEQ# STUDENT # NAME AND ADDRESS RC CODE PHO\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_880","title":"Court filings: District Court, interim findings and recommendations of the special master","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1988-08-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Court records","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","Education--Evaluation","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, interim findings and recommendations of the special master"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/880"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_399","title":"Discipline, quarterly district suspension summary report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1988-08/1989-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline, quarterly district suspension summary report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/399"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nI I I T TLE HOCK SCHOOL CT  J .  . 6 y / c $  V T988^9' D1 s tr'i c t JWTcIe Total Enrollment Black Enrollment White Enrollment Other Enrollment 25,625 16,093. 9,241 - 292 63% 36% 1% OUT 0 F S C H C 0. I. Li rL'ERO^SCHdOU~Dl^RfcT SUSPLNSIOH DATA 1989-90 DISTftICT -SUMMARY ----------QUART R'*\"ir'O (August 28,1989 - Janaury 25, 1990) LONG T E k n 1989-90 District-Wide Total Enrollment Black Enrollment White Enrollment Other Enrollment t X H U 1. S IONS 25,303 16,296 8,692 315 64% _ 35% 1% SCHOOL B/M B/F W/M U/F TOTAL S/H B/F U/M M/F- TOT AL B/M Bz^F w/n w/r TOTA GRAND TOTAL SENIOR HIGH TOTALS JUinOR HIEH^TTSLy ELEMENTARY TOTALS 1S1 TTTTT 57 'SOT 144 ' 21 59 24 23 ^7 e 90 I 97 0 0 'c: 0 0 T 0 1 4 3 12 TT 1 1 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 1 \u0026amp; 1 8 1 320 88E 01 GirAFn5~TOT7n::^ 78 6- 87 05 59.1 21.6 15.4 52 J . 9 1330 9 4.6 *31' 17.1  4 . 1 2.4 4 1 2.9 25 4 5 1 71.4 11.414.3 35 2.5 1 40o 5.6 BLACK KALE BLA'CK female 342 98 59 9 2\", .2 '.140 SI . 1 WHITE HALE WHITE PEMA.LE 1 54 IS. 1 3.8 ie.9 2.3 PERCENT OF DISTRICT .SiJSPENS ION-S u'ERE IN THE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS. 62.9 PERCENT .OF DISTRICT SUSrENSICNS UERE IN THE JUNIOR KICtt SCHOOLS. 14.3 PERCENT OF DI-STRIC SUSPENSION WERE IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1988-89 DISTRICT SUMMARY (August 29, 1988 - January 19. 1989) SENIOR HIGH TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH TOTALS TLTHENTARir TOTALS GRAND TOTALS PERCENT GAIN/LOSS 139 .71 439 181 TTT 29 184 18 13 695 270 56% 22% 91+ 17+ 226 18%. 21- 1 40 2 240 844 150 16 14 2 2 3. 0 3  1 0 0 0 21 18 2 13 13 0 0 A 0 1 J. 0 0 0. 0 14 16. 0 275 jaza. 152 21% 67% 12% 43 ' 1234 4% 9+ 95% 32 78% A 12%, 10% BLACK-KAUfr 754 BLACK FEMALE 275 1026 twite male WHITE FEMALE 43 96+ 1- 1988-89 1305 .1983-90 1406. 277 2+  2 0 0... AL 3% 25_ 87% XL 0 4 13% XL 0 JO. 2% 1305. 5.1% .58%- 21% m Isf 3% 7TT 1+ 0- 1- 4+ 1 + 1 + 5+ 101+5-r V' ' Ir C i\" ' c ' c  cl .Cfe hs Ct\nIts K- 1 LITT . ROCK SC}\nCOL DJiVRICI REASON COPE *J470 03/09 '90 PAGE 1 c OUT B/M 0 F B/F CATEGORY I OFFENSES f hI cl 5^ {z\u0026amp; 1010 1 030 1 040 1 050 1 062 1 070 1 090 1100 1110 1131 1132 1 133 1 245 18 1 8 273 1 1 15 1 14 69 u^. F - :SC| SUBTOTAL____ CATEGORY U OFFENSES \u0026gt;0 - Cf SI- tc 0 17 t8 S9 to 12 OE 95 16  CE c IS iO tto r NB ' c \u0026gt;2 SUBTOTAL CATEGORY III OFFENSES SUBTOTAL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY_BY REASON CODES QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 SCHOOL L 0 N G T _E_R  EXPULSIONS ir s Hh IC 9 U/ U/F TOTAL B/M B/F W/tl U/F TOTAL B/ B/F U/M U/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL iic 12  13 - c 1B L-' 16 58 2 22 58 VO 7 12 2 428 21 61 412 1 1 5 a 74 18 3 6 1 1 41 8 5 8 17 2 4 4 2 6 6 3 2 1 13 17 138 31 9 12 0 1 0 0 _0 o' 0  a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. 429 21 61 412 1 13 17 138 31 9 12 666 51 180 48 1 1 45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 46 -0 S zc Z' HH Z4 ZJ pc ze Zi PO S2 2010 2 02 o' 2030 2032 2050 2060 2070 080 2100 211 0 2120 2121 2123 25 1 6 15 6 5 2 4 4 2 1 5 1 9 1 1 4 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 26 19 0  \u0026amp; 1 1 0 3 5 31___ 1 1 1 5 1 1 0 5 0 1 'o* 0 1 3 94 24 19 2 139 3 10 20 s 1 6 0 0 0 3 15 1 0 0 26 1 3 7 0 1 1 0 3050 3071 3072 3080 3090 3100 3121 3123 3 12 3 3 2  25 1 6 2 3 1 12 5 1 1 2 1 4 22 3 8 4 0 2 44 2 3 a i a 1 1 1 9 1 2 1 0 a 3 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 4 1 13 14 1 1 g 3 1 4 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3. 0 0 0 8 2 1 2 4 8 0 2 4 23 35 34 19 1 6 1 1 1 4 9 49 2 1 1 173 3 7 27 7 2g 4 3 7 30 IO I BH. S9 I (( 4' if', M  tc |0  s -6 61 * 53 HH 10 M l~i 25 Z 2D Z 3! 0\nss 0 sc SC KH PO z: ' Z2  zi .3 0, ii 0l^s C. 1 tllTlE ROCK LSIIOOL DISTRICT e'~~ ff: c C\n'i| :*i5 Uz f/J 2 1 22 Q t/ T 0 F REASON CODE B/n B/F \u0026gt; zs. = ^'R C'O 33  0 31 1 s 6 C \" S9 C- !? 4?i HU 5' Illi 52\nC \" 54 5S 5 o oa LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY BY REA-SON CODES QUARTER 1 1 TO QUARTER 1 2 SCHOOL LONG T - R. M. J24 n 0.\n/0\u0026lt;V90 f- X P U I. S I 0 N S PAGE MH W/M U/F TOTAL B/n B/F W/M U/F TOTAL B/M B/r M/ W/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CATEGORY IV OFFENSES SUBTOTAL ^AND TOTALS 4000 1 1 s 1 1 4 4 7 0 1 0 Z 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 7 78C 20S 53.1 21.6 15.4 52 3.3 1330 94.6 .31 7 75.6 17.1 e 4.9 1 .4 41 _ e'. 9 5 4 5 71.4 11.4 14.3 1 2.9 35 2.S 1406 a El    EE ED EE EE EQ E EE EE EE EE S 3 S S c o c _8 5 PERCENT OF DISTRICT SUSPENSIONS MERE CATEGORY I OFFENSES. l.3 PERCENV OF DISTRICT SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY II OFF-ENSES. 5.7 PERCENT OF DISTRICT SUSPENSIQNS WERE CATEGORY III OFFENSES. _0 5 FERCEJ^T OF DISTRICT SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY IV OFFENSES. 3 I2: li 1 li 0 HH o  SE lE E sE ED Z EE  CD Z Z\nZ s z IS O 0 o HH O go 52 53 16 56  57 ic io 61 HH 63 54 55 M f . 67 V 66 5S Po  Z' p, NH cIf r (  c f C !'^l i' ci BfiG C-B o  -sol  ci BU\n3\u0026lt; j I gI loj Ga 0- IIB *5? C1 ib, . c  0^ i, \u0026gt;6 ^26  DB^ 0 LIFTlL s?OtK SCJOOl jISTF DISCIPLINE CODE CATEGORY 1 OFFENSES 1 01 0 1 030 1 040 1 050 1062 1 070 1 090 1100 1110 1131 1 132 1 133 CATEGORY  OFFENSES 2010 020 2030 2031 032 20S0 2060 2070 2080 2100 1 1 0 2120 2121 2122 2123 CATEGORY 3 OFFENSES 301 0 3020 3030 3040 3050 3060 3071 3072 aoeo CI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER:  SUSPENSION REASON CODES DISCIPLINE REASON  Academic Dishonesty Fighting Harrassment Left School w/o Permission Refused to Ob_e_y Rule/Direct ive Refused to Obey Bus RulesARegs Refused to Serve Detention Smoking Using Foul or Abusive Language First Offense pse/Poss Alcohol Use/Poss. Drugs \u0026lt;1 st)____________ Repeated School/Class Tardies Assault Bat t ery Theft _ Burgla.ry/Larceny_____*_____________ Robbery Gambling Faise Ala rm Loitering / Criminal Tresspass Malicious Mischief / Vandalism Indecent EKPOsure Disorderly Conduct Harassing Communi cat i ons Repeated Violation-Smoking Ban Forgery/Failure to Provide ID Use of Paging Devices Sale/Distribution of Alcohol Second Offense, Alcohol Sale/Distribut ion of Drugs______ Second Offense, Drugs . Fail-Counsl/trtmnt-Alcohl/Drgs Arson______________________________________ Physical Assault on Staff Verbal Assault on Staff Possession of FiTom______________ J2470 ABBREVIATION 03/05,'Sd D i shon. ______F i ght i ng _________ Harrass LeftSchl Ref Ruis .Bus Regs Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Drug/A 1 Drugs 1 Tardies Assault Battery Theft Buro/Lar Robbery Gambling False Al Loiter Mischief Ind Exp Die Cond Har Comm Smoke 2 Forgery Paging D Sale Ale Alcohol2 Sale Pro Drugs 2 F-Trtront Arson Ass Staf V As Sf PoS8 Gun PAGc 1 C'^ T\\  3 4  c HH 8  10 12 c 13 IS c IS i!C zc 'zi II h 10 2il ZS 27 zi ' z\u0026lt; PC 32  32 -C 33 5E  37 0 i C) 39 IC 4' 10 44 gO 43 9 ' so 50, 52 BB so 56  \u0026gt;7 10  10 M ' 53 66 z\n57'^ u  53 HH ^0 I?  73 IQ .S 0': ..-V r ( C m\n,1 I d Ci ' Cr 9 Cf? 421 ck T liB- CM t LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 03/C9/90 PACE HH c .i l'^ I's '^1 2S \"C 2! i c 3. hS 40 0^ efc? 10 cfe \u0026gt;8  ci cl ( ps c DISCIPLINE CODE 3090 31 DO 311 0 3120 3121 3122 3123 CATEGORY 4 OFFENSES 4000 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1984-90 DISTRICT S^nARY_ QUARTER: 1 TO qUARTER : 2 SUSPENSION REASON CODES DISCIPLINE REASON J k' s IC B 9 iic 12 13 KH sses51on_of Weapon_________ Poss Fireworks or Explosives Ext option. Blackmail, Inciting to Riot__ ___ Coercion Use of Weapon Unlawful Assembly MembershIp_in Prohibited Gangs_______ Offense not menjtioned Pos Ueap Poss Exp Extort In Riot Weapon Assembly G an g _ M e tn ^c 16  17 'ilc J ** 2- 24 ' 2! ,21  J  2S KK Other Of j1 V.i' u ' )3 n  27  V-* |O *! HH 16 |Z Si I 0 6 31 Z Z z c RH 0 u po s UH 0u r I uITlL? '.OCK oLUOOl Dj.rr :/cy, ?c A .f 1 ( c. 2 3 e 11 11^\n9 o I2 C 5 15 IE c \u0026lt;8 19 c ?? tie. rC o N 25' 27 :z 28 c IS\nI\nC 3?! C q *^1 C ^5 h\nP S c u. c s: S3| M? c GRADE LEVEL ENROLLMhT Grade Black T7T9O SU. TTT 39 11 1,053 57 756 42 12 876 51 829 47 White % Other % Toiil G/a E/F eranrTO lb 56.3 17.5 GRfIQZ n 22 50.5 23.7 C\"SDI 12 GF.'ND TOIftLS 23 11 IF. 2 i?.7 151 52 1 19.7 ?9 T ,971 . % 1.36 24 1 1,833 33 L 1 r T L E  R 6 C f S C H 0 0 L\" D I o T R I C T SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY aVARTER\n1 TO OU/iRT'ER 2 29 2 1,734 31 SENIOR HIGH ENROLLMENT Black Enrollment White Enrollment Other Enrollment 5,537 3,119 57% 2,336 42% 82 1% OUT OF SCHOOL TOTfil BlftCK /F TOTftl uHni TCTSL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS LC K 6 TIRU EX RULSIOflS TOTALS D/f TOTfiL /fi u/r UMTL ICTUL 3/n E/r TOTfl ilf.CK K/B /r TOTfil Will Torsi TOTSL ELftCK TOlf.L UHITt SRftHO TOIF.l 74.1 69 74.2 39 30\" 208 71.7 z 3 ( 6 B 9 12 Ta - c IS X,. IE 17 E ( i ' _ tis X- \"79 21.5 17 18.3 n 6 4.4 35 25.9 ! 35 'C 2 Vo iO.C 20.G 1C0.G G 0.0 10 6.7 T 2 5 60.0 ^iC.u 100 C 0 0.0 3.3 115 76.7 35 22.3 150 7 7.5 24 25.8 93  4 S9.4 - 100.0 4 IGO.O 0 0.0 4 3.8 i 7 S5.7 K.3 10C.0 0 0.0 7 6.7 SO 75.9 24 23.1 104 31  3!  10 21.0 16 1 :rr 0 0 0 G 1 25.6 4 6.1 42 63.6 24 36.4 ( 59 20.3 7.9 62 .1 .12 11 35.7 14..J 100.G 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 e.o 14 4.4 12 : 75.c- i?.g 15 .4 1 6.3 0 0.0 6.3 15 5.0 23? 74.1 25.9 46.9 PERCHW.f'OF SKNIOR HIGH SUSPiiN 32.5 FIPCtfiT O\nT :\nefH V. :nicr HIGH .?IJSPEN SlNIOB high SUS Of-: WERE IN THE c R cl IN THc : IN THE 1 IC TH VRADK. GR\n-D\u0026lt; . . grade. 38\n. jX- it 5P S 3S 31 ZQ SI (. HH   . i9 sc se - ( il X_ 1 H'* 7( , T2 \" 22 i .IS 0y. c ci ( 6 :'klTTue KOCK SCHOOL OISTRICr LU.-IE ROCK SCHOOL D I P I C T SUSPENSION D.^TA i^8-?-90 DisrPicT \u0026amp;urtrz\\r,v '.-UARTEft  1 TO QUARThH a i9 03/09/v PAGE 1 o r\\ K-  Hh Ic C 8  10 II  13 14 -I 15 c I Igl igi 5, C  24 25 G  i5 * ::? o u (M -I 2? S . 29 3C 31 IIH C i sE E c c H! C c. ^'1 ' c \u0026gt; SEMIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 8 9 SCHCOL EZn B/F CENTRfiL HIGH SCHOOL H?.Ll KiOlTStHUOl 36 OUT or SCKOOL' total ~aACK ii/n ll/F ' TOTAL \" UHITE lOTfiL B/fl B/F K 58.1 22.6 50 80 6 10 16.5 2 ? 2 12 19.4 62 86 } 6 1 32' TT 64,0 22.0 43 86.0 5 10.0 4.0 -1- 14.0 5O' 94 3 L 0 K C T  R fl  K P II I S : 0 H S T 0 T fil S \u0026lt;c 11 12 13 nnffCPOLUftH OO-TECH EH c HflRuVISH ARTS RSeKET fflio hlGH SCHOOL flC CLZLLAN HIGH SCHOOL - OtlNO TOTOLS 2R 2 4 28.6 28.6 STn\" ' 3 ITT 3 7 fSO.O TOTAL . black  U/fl H/F TOTAL TOTAL BIT B/fl B/f TOTAL BLACK /n K/r TOTAL HHin TOTAL TOTAL BLACK TOTAL tfBITI\" GRANO \" c, 13 1 55.7 14.3 IK.O 100.0 100.0 0 o:o 0 0.0 7 9.7 2 66.7 66.7 1 33.3 1 33.3 3 4.2 59 81.9 13 18 1 12 IE IE E  L Hh C 5 0.0 2 3.8 100.0 100.0 0 0.0 1 1.9 46 86.8 7\" 13.2 TFT  S 2Z a- EE z c c 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3.0 4 * 57.1 3 42,9 1 I 8 21.6 1 2.7 9 24.3 16 12 43.2 32.4 28 73.7 Z1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 24.3 28 1^.1 37 39 53.2 19.8 81 7Z.^ a 22.5 4.5 30 27.0 111 96.5 '0 0.0 0 9.9 0 0.0 3 1 75.0 25.0 4 100.0 0 0.0 4 3.5 83 73.9 30\"~' 26.1 TTY Z a z z SE SE S S Z o Hh o O o a z 14 1 21 60.9 30.4 91.3 2 9.7 2 9.1 23 63.9 4 1 a 80.0 28.0 100.0 0 TC 3 1379 6 2 73.0 25.0 8 lOO.fl 0 0.0 3 22.2 34 2 94.4 5.6' 36 o HH O a 191 37 32.1 19.7 208 71.7 99 20.3 23 7.9 82 28.3 290 90.6 12 2 H 83.7 1 4.3 1 00.0 nr 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 19 4.4 12 '3 73.0 18.8 13 93.8 1 6.3 0 0.0 1 6.3 16 3.0 237 74.1 83 25.9 3Hr 33 S! S Z T' o 6 G  eZ HH O F ti^ c ory c iiS 5 PERCEM Or 5EN\nO\\ HIGH SVSPEN^I'JWS ULbC M Ct.M-iZ't H.CH .'U\u0026lt; ? 16 6 PtRCENT OF SENICf HIGH SUSPENSIONS UEPE hall HIGH CH( 'jL ? PERCENT OF SENIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT HEI ROPOLI VAN vJ-Tf-tCH hIGh SCHCOl. C' C 2 UiTT-- ( 5 6 II ff-PPRCeNT-CF 'SENI OR HIG'H SUSPENSI ONS'WERE AT PARKV J I-U AE T S -Ai. 3? 9 PERCENT OF SENIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT J ' 1-T l-IGH SCHOO'.. MK H.''.H H 1 ^KRCENT OF SSMIOR HIGH J'USPENSI ONS UGRE Al HcCLi'.LAN 0 O' PERCENT OF SKNIOH HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT PARKCIEw '^ WOL V. .iaSNET HIGH SCHOOL. 4C s ^C c. B i a 9 10 CE 5C*^s- 12 la ! f  S4 ------------g (iti 15 16 hiWi^X' u*.'. f. I  I J O**?' h?\" 6 K : *3  \u0026gt; Vi f-,' C- lit! c c C le !a la IE c C: AiC- C-  sH'  3 3 3   c c 3  3 i 3      3 cs liiiE. \u0026gt; 11^ c  a a a IS t: t te K fi W C'  V'W iH SI I 52 C S! 6i c jiil S k^- V M: 3. J' r. M-: ^rr Uk *- J t.JBir ?\u0026lt; T V.T L W'a A \u0026gt;y \u0026gt; 1 I c 1 HH |c o o @c i HH 3/1 bo I go 6 52^ G U o io p  HN O n.L'.uuJi f' c C'l . 3 4?  C-i K 12 14 15 16 C'-i 18 19 Q- h\nC C o ** N s s 2 S S 271 ^4 C  0 . h\no| I UirrUE KOI K D1S-: luT LITTLE ROCK SCHCOJ. DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 OISTFICT SUMMARY BY REmSCN'CODES QUARTER. 1 't3 QUARTER:  SENIOR HIGH LEVEL ttie46? 03/09.''90 PAGE ^:K- 1 kl* Ic 0 L T 0 F SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPULSIONS '3 c REASON CODE Bn .?/f W/M W/F TOTAL B/M B/I- W/ U/F TOTAL B/M B/F W/N W/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 1 Hl' t 3 ' I 0 } a 9^  HH C CATEGORY 1 OFFENSES ia i'a] 13 13 ill o c SUBTOTAL CATEGORY II OFFENSES SUBTOTAL CATEGORY III OFFENSES SUBTOTAL CATEGORY IV OFFENSES SUBTOTAL To 3 0 1 040 1 050 1 OSg\" 1 070 i 090 TT0(r 1110 1 131 n ig\" 1 133 1 \n8\" 1 1 1 7 1 4 p\n---------11 7 4 8 '4 4 c c 1 2  1 2 25 63' 1 3 ' 10---------- 31 20 - 4-------- 2 G\" 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  'SI 25 63 1 8 10 31 0 4  2 Tg^ 4? 36 '22 SaV  O' \u0026amp; (T -Q ' - 0 0 0 0 249 Rhy st 2! zs L j: c c o 1]  hFz (3\u0026lt; 201 0 2020 2030 2032 2070 2080 l 0 0 21 I 0 2123 3072 3080 3090 3121 4000 T e 2 4 2 4 1 22 5 5 0 1 T 1 I 1 1 3 2 1 7 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 9 2 0'  4 0 3 S 1 28 13 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 T 1 f 0 4 0 \"1 1 0 3 1 0 9 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 J 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 i) 2 0 4 1 C\u0026gt; 2 5 I -4------ 1 1 1 fn 5 1 1 5 0 1 0 6 45 c (A \u0026gt; 1 ic I-- w H.H o 1 0 - O 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 15 3 2 2 ic \"S TT 3 0 0 7  2'2 |c 6( g: t 1 1 3 3  I HH 3 0 0 0 3 4 o 0 c.( 1 Ln.If- P.OCK SCHOOL DIS \u0026gt; I c r C J.' PACE HH C frc--, - r I LITTLE' ROCK SCHO-JH. DISTRICT susPEN.'^roN data 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY BY REASON CODES QUARTER\n1 TO QUARTER-- 2 SENIOR HIGH LEVEL 7? fz |l3 I'S c c lif 0 0 F SCHOOL LONG, TERM EXPULSIONS  9 'z\nc I' 16 I7j  c G ' sHH 24 2! 2E li5 28 0 \u0026gt;2 J is c (il!, 3\u0026lt; Gy G7 CG HH 0 cc REASON CODE S/M 3/F W/M U/F TOTAL B/ B/F U/M L/F TOTAL S HH B/K b/F M/M U/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL ac *3 112 GRAND TOTALS IS'f T?' 5 1 19.7 0.3 3 7.9 29'0 90.6 -1-^---------g----------- 0  85.7 14.3 0.0 0 0. a 14 4.4 \"12 75.0 18.8 1 \u0026gt; .3 0 0.0 1 e s.o 320 2C  21 ___ M 25 ic fii!Px-.rT 77.8 PERCENT OF SENIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS UERS CATEGORY TinFE7TCEfrrOF~SrR10R IfT^H\"SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY 6.9 PERCENT OF SENIOR HIGH SUSPENSION-S WERE CATEGORY 1.3 PERCENT OF SENIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY I OFFENSES. II OFFENSES. Ill OFFENSES. IV OFFENSES. C 27i 28  2J HH |g 32 n sO 37 HG c a hh |o \u0026lt;c w 5C I o z as O 3 V a I a: L HH U Iz z c tZ S' iZ tC z 0 o -SSI s HH O .-..19'J . V.! ' je\u0026lt;J9AlAlML\"UW Uia. JWJKXlKSr ( 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #J2470 03/09/9^ AGE 1 f   3 GRADE LEVEL ENROLLMENT 5rade Black' White % Other % Total ( 6 8 9 . TTOTZ.Ky . .32_25_rT_ -?70^ 1,328 1,116 68 63 596 635 30 38 35 32 2 1,962 2 1,783 % 35_ . 34 31 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 aUNIOR HIGH ENROLL. JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS Total: Black: White: Other: 5,750 3,788 1,867 95 66% 32% 2% s! . 3/. . (. i -i' 9 10 OUT 0 r 3 C 8 0 0 L_ LONG T E R.B EXPULSIONS TOTALS f 12 13 Bnj B/r TOTAL B/R I .MX _____ B/r TOTAL UNITE TOTAL B/R IS 16 e t 2': I OMBI 7 GtaSE s ___Kan 3 165 42 64.0 16.3 207 80.2 46 5 17.8 1.9 51 19.8 258 96.6 181 97 98.6 31.4 278 90.0 21 6.8 10 3.2 31 10.0 309 93.6 10 144 64 B/F TOTAL BLACK U/fl U/F TOTAL HITE TOTAL B/R B/f TOTAL BLACK H/R fi/F TOTAL BUITE TOTAL TOTAL . BLACK TOTAL UNITE GRANB TOTAL r 2 2 66.7 66.7 1 33.3 1 33.3 3 1.1 5 83.3 5 83.3 1 16.7 1 16.7 6 2.2 214 80.1 53 19.9 267 3 71.4 21.4 13 92.9 1 7.1 1 7.1 14 4.2 3 1 71.4 14.3 6 83.7 1 1 14.3 14.3 7 2.1 297 90.0 33 10.0 330 27, C u N r 26 27 2S 30 GKAKD TOTALS 9: J3! c S c a s a I s \u0026gt;1 c*- a o S2.4 23.3 208 79.6 33 20.0 12 4.4 67 24.4 273 99.8 6 89.7 6 89.7 1 14.3 1 14.3 7 2.4 2 40.0 2 40.0 3 60.0 3 60.0 9 1.7 216 73.3 71 24.7 287 490 203 38.2 24.1 693 62.3 122 27 14.5 3.2 149 17.7 842 93.2 16 9 21 66.7 20.8 87.3 2 8.3 1 3 4.2 12.3 24 2.7 12 66.7 1 3.6 13 72.2 4 1 5 22.2 5.6 27.8 18 2.0 727 82.2 137 17.8 884 30.2 PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE SEVENTH GRADE. 37.3 PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE EIGHTH GRADE. 32.5 PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE NINTH GRADE. gt.' c pjS. _____ OiT'\" ' F 4 / c Ci1 Fh-  1 Ce9 c 10 12 13 Ce IC IS 1\u0026gt;99  C - 25 C. 552 !4 2S oC  ?f!il 27 ' 26 \"0 C )0 31 33 34 36 Q fiB 39 (2 Ch IS C5 14 16 19 \u0026amp;- 57 e^' 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT oCHOOL B/il flBKH ilftTB/SClEKCE AaWET 23 TOBffiTT'JlJRnimiCH' Ja47O 03/09/90 PAGE I 2^ OUT UI st tHTST B/F 12 TOTAL HJW K/n lOTftL TOTAL 3/fl 33 \u0026lt;17.9 25.0 72.9 48 25~ 80.0 31 3 91,3 FOREST HEIGHTS JUfOCR HK 127 37 16^ 117 1S\"5 7TT PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HI 52 28 57.1 28.8 78 85.7 SOUTNEST JUnOS HIGH 78 38 ^.7 20.0 112 7^.7 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH 93 29 70.N 21.5 124 91.9 aoVEROALE JUNIOR HIGH 38 29 09.3 39.7 85 39.0 MBaOALE JUNIOR HIGH 9 58.7 15.0 43 71.7 13 27 1 13 27.1 4? 92 .\u0026lt; 2 fii.l 8 33 H.O \u0026lt;(.4 8 1 8.8 7.7 31 20.7 7 4.7 11 8.1 7 9.8 1 1.4 19 23.3 3 \"Z\" 8.8 i.'J 93 0 100 3 42 2'.^ 1 HSi e LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 196^5'5 CISRI t r SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 lO QUARTER: E JUNlSir^HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS L 0 K C T  R n IXPULSIONS TOTALS B/r TOTAL TOT 2 e8.7 5 100.0 1 ITF 94 9 100.0 lOOTS\" 13 19.3 91 91.0 8 3 9 86.7 33.3 100.0 Ti/fl M/f TOTAL uH'nr TCTfll B/S 6/F TOTAL H/it fl/F TOTAL iBun - TOTfit TOIfiL TOTAL GRANS W IC s9 RC 12 13 h\u0026gt;i - C' 55 C.' 16 ' 17 - c IS 2C 38 25.3 130 98.8 0 0.0 n 8.1 135 99.3 0 0.0 8 11.0 73 94.8 2 2 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 17 3.0 28.3 hQ 0 0.0 1 33.3 1 33 3, T\" ^.9 0 0.0 0.0 1 1 2 50.0 50.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 5.8 5 5.8 1 0.5 9 9.0 2 1.3 0 0.0 9 5.2 0 0.0 1 1 1.O 100.0 0 0.0 1 1.9 38 73.1 H 28.9 32 23 24 '2 1 too.o 1 100.0 0 0.0 1.2 79 91.9 7 8.1  ^C 1 hh Rc \u0026gt;2 33 8 1 9 80.0 iO.O 90 1 10.0 1 10.0 10 4.8 179 89.2 43 19.8 217 0O| n 37 mo z Ooe *c \u0026gt; 33.3 1 SQ.O 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 B7 87.0 13 13.0 100 5^0 14   IS 1 33.3 1 1 2 33.3 33.3 88.7 3 1.9 113 72.9 92 27.1 tss U ' 19 lifi o ' -6 51 '-/ 0 0.0 1 100.Q 1 100.0 1 . 9.7 124 12 8.8 138 . *2 * E3 |0 S6  0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 89 89.8 8 10.9 77 1 50.0 1 50.0 1 50.0 2 3.2 4\u0026lt;t 71.0 1? 29.0 82 |C HH |C ' i Ic y |o Is c rw H- ( 1 LIT'.Lu nOCX SCHOOL DISTRICT # Jt'lTC Q3/09/S0 PAGE t, c '.v ci3 majV E s LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 fc s hH Ic I Cl H. 9 JUNTOR HzGH SCHOOL TOTALS 9 IO '\\4i\nt .*5.- liil P'5' J5 'r . 1'  '  .f.( - C E 11 12 10r Ts^ fi L s 13 C. 11 12 13 IS cT\n13 19 C 12 lifi 21 22 C- J3 24 29 Cl! o IS tM 21 26 G !S 20 JI }4 Ci \u0026gt;e 0 i w 10 On 12 \u0026gt;3 \u0026gt;\nC : (: S  tc Oi? la *9 Q 15 SCHDGL B/ft 6/F SRflHB TOTALS q91 203 58.2 24.1 0 U I (Il 'S'CIOBT ------------------ TliTr?TOT Tk P'ii L (\u0026gt; i iT fi S 51 .. C 2 55 C i\nIj i^ c TTSSHX ii*... / \"* V' lOWL XIHX 694 '521' *e U/rt /F TOiftl -------- snrr roiftL fc/ E/F TOTAL -------------------Kircr U/d a/f roTat iQTrtL TOTl------------- fi/O Bzr rarsL Hfflar a/fl HZF rorfiL TOTu inni------ TOTRL locir TOTAL TOTT GRAKS nmr sc tfi - f IS 21 i HH g4l V. 122 27 H9 14 5 3.2 'm '.. tr  Cart! r.' 843 irr 5 21 ?r72O~573* I 1 3 24 TT 12 1 U 51 7272' 4 7272 1 yr 5 27,8 16 2.0 728 157 17.7 883 r Iz  2Z S Z Z Z 31 iS Z 21 2 IE  iE Z Z Z E Z Z z G o O' Hh: 6: o mb!\n:. a ^x z a i s i I O HH O o o 3 Z Z iE SI SE EE (2 ET o HH Q 9 C . 'JRl c s. ' PEncern of j-'iijo-. hjsh suspensjons were at makn math/sciencs macnft junior high school. 9.7 percent of J!)N1ORHIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT DUNBAR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. 24 PERCENT Of JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WEREZ^FOREST HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Pii G E,\" Ji* PW-' c.' l\nr A Ca s 7 G - !2 V. * IS 16 G\nL !! i\n22 G\n!3 24 25 k .^. o II u 28 5Cs 30 1* - t.  fe 'C' J .' 34 G  26 17 G i?. \u0026lt;r^ -' f~ \\y.'\nk'. P 4- 29 to 4 L !2 3 'S 12 w K G^ (S - 0  18 ts Cr  Ills- C 2 I - 57 4t C'  TT  -ERCENr'OF Ji7R0R^HT6K suspensions WERE AT PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH SCH00l7 IV.fy PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH -SUSPENSIONS WERE AT SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. IS.l PERCENT OF .JUNIOR IIISH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. \u0026amp; V PERCENT OF'Junior high SUSPENS1ONSW^S\" AT~HANN''ATrT5'\u0026gt;lA^NFi' JUNloJTltlGH SCHOOL, 8.? PERCENT Of JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. 7 0 PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE AT MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCtlOOL. i., s^jw -.12- r LLflttV.JSkA ..UL-. .Ull!j!9il.JR! .V jA ic s' jC 8 9 12 13 hh - C\" J5 S?\" X- \"h.\u0026lt; tt l^aKfrlS 16 37 jic ZC ' z - c  J! 26 22  2\u0026lt; o He pc 22 'sa at ' 27 2 O 29 tc ' 41 x.  'i\nHH 0 Z ai EE ai a: aj s\n31 Z Z s 3 o O o en o R? 22^ o If eC a cE Z! (S o \u0026amp; HD TSnSMV CC f c LiTT-t .?och s\u0026lt;\niooi- DIS ,irr 0J247O 0 3/ 09/90 PAGE c 2 3 5 6 7 8 U T 0 F c c. c Ilf c to H 12 !J 14 IS \u0026gt;6 17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 -c \u0026lt;9 N 24 2S 26 11 3   J .c? :1 J REA-ON CODE B/M B/F CATEGORY I OFFENSES ------ffOBrOTAt CATEGORY II OFFENSES JI C'2 fiH 33 J4 Ci 36 c 37 39 10 0^ t: i3 45 \u0026gt;6 c se (9 Ci?,.  t\" S2 C' \u0026gt;4 5S - c  SUBTOTAL CATEGORY UI OFFENSES SUBTOTAL CATEGORY IV OFFENSES L iTlT.e ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA l?89--90 OISTRlCr SUMMARY \u0026amp;Y REASON'COOtS SCHOOL u/r QUAR^EI^ : TOTAL 1 TO QUARTER: 2 JUNIOR HIGH LEVEL Bz'M LONG TERM EXPUJ. SIGNS B/F U/M U/F TOTAL B/M B/F W/M U/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Ic 5 Ph IC 8 9 12 13 - c J5 '\u0026gt; 16 fe 1 IS TTtr )30  i40 T TSO\" 1 62 1 190 = inr 1110  531 nF 1 133 1'4 1 5 173 4 SO 4 3 f 06 S 1 ~T 31 3 3 '7 12 1 a T?2 15^ ------ 4 294 17 37' 56 96 1 1 ) 1 0 741 1 1 0 0 0 2010 2020 2030 2060 070 2oe0 2100 211 0 120 .2121 IT 8 7 S 1 T 4  1 1 1 1 2 1 0 45 T 18 1 4 1 1 f 12 1 T? 13 1 0 6 1 1 2 2 20 1 1 76 1 2 7 3 1 1 0 4 Q 0 3050 3071 3072 3080 3090 3100 3121 3123 1 7 3 1 2 2 18 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 9 3 4 4 0 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 24 5 1 2 1 0 1 0 IT 0 0 0 0 T 0 1 0 0 0 0 y 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 0 t 14 0 1 2 0 5 0 0 1 9 1 1 1 3 1 4 TO 0 0 0 1 1 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .  295 17 15\" 56 5 1 98 1 I  1 0 2\u0026lt; 2' HH IC 2! PC 26 ' 2S IC 32 'S3 -b 0 TT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 6 0 1 4 1 6 742 19 1 4 10 6 1 1 2 4 31 2 1 91 3 3 12 4 15 4 1 7 49 3 Io IC  4'  I o II  I! IE o  31 Z a: 3 o HH o se I so o S3 o |0 2C o 73 iS 9 oSi % tJ- i* c C i c s 8 9 Hh 15 16 C ^7 IS 19 C-J 21 22 24 25 I'lc - ,i V 'SfiH 21 ze C  JO 33 J4 . )6 J7 C !2 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DAT.A !98S~90 DISTRICT SUMMARY BY'Ti'ETiSON' COOES QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: c JUNIOR HIGH LEVEL. QJ2-1T0 UJ/ Ov. 90 PACE Liv HH e IC $ iC 8^ 9 OUT 0 F SCHOOL 'LONG TERM C X P U'L S I 0 N S REASON CODE 4000 B/H B/F W/M U/F TOTAL B/M B/F W/M U/F TOTAL B/M B/F U/M U/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL KN 16 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 Ie ^BTUTATT Grand totals fj 0 IT '6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Z' c 2! \u0026gt;- fiH )9 10 C !2 *2 13 45 6 O !2 58 c hh 51 52 'r O 52 5* $8 0^ * C' T?.STOSS.s 4. t TS?------sr--- K 5 3,2 5S. 3 TS\" 66.7 20.S 2~ 8.3 1 4 2 24 .7 1 66.7 1 5.6 2 4 I S ~r\" 5.6 Tg .0 S85 24  Z! K 2\n21 2(  ZS UH 83 8 PERCENT OF JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY I OFFENSES. \"IT\n-Tp-ER^znri- OF- juHroftKiefr^sFeNSiONS uere CATecoKY it offenses. r.5 PERCENT Or JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY III OFFENSES. C.i PERCENT 0=- JUNIOR HIGH SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY IV OFFENSES. pc 32  W |O| 3 n 37 Z  f'\"} W U  o. U  I! HH |o U ' IS SC JO Jij 52  53 |6 S4 SI HH u . u ' y Io * 55 Io W ID C1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #J2471 03/09/9\\ PACE 1 r GRADE LEVEL ENROLLMENT Grade Black' ' i I 6 K 1 2 3 White % Other % ( T~-------4 1,465 1,311 1,404 55 624 53 22 1 Total % s 9 10 e I2 hl , r 16 CflUX 17 16 1 6SUS 1 ( a GRftDI I 12! ! ' tl oaiis 3 ( 32 OBK 4 \u0026lt; g cc txi~  caus 9 39 ' A 1-1\ncl 5! j?\" t* itt* 51 5: 55 '(j 56  XI 68 65 67 1,362 66 1,297 \" 1,278 GSm T0T6L8 67 69 667 688 661 678 607 564 31 34 32 33 32 20' 1 17 20 21  18 1 1 1 1 T\n^ 14 2,152 15 2,016 14 2,085 15 2,061  15  '''^2 14 1.922 13 B/n B/F TOTRL BLACK B/R B/F TOTRL RHTE TOTftL B/n 1 100.0 4 66.7 1^ 4 71.4 29.6 27 9 1 100.0 4 66.7 14 100.0 32 71.1 13.2 84.2 28 84.8 3 9.1 31 93.9 37 7 44 77.1 14.6 91.7 36 8 44 64.3 14.3 78.6 143 27 170 73.0 13.8 86.7 1 1 16.7 16.7 6 19.6 2 6.1 3 1 6.3 2.1 12 21.4 24 12.2 2 1.0 0 0.0 2 33.3 0 0.0 6 19.8 2 6.1 4 8.3 12 21.4 26 13.3 1 100.0 6 100.0 14 100.0 38 100.0 33 91.7 48 96.0 96 100.0 196 96.0 2 100.0 1 100.0 3 100.0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 ELEHENTARY SCHOOL TOTALS lOMG TERfl txputsions 8/r 0 ELEK ARY ENROLL. Total. 14,106 Bl ack: White: Other: ( 9,389 67% . 4,489 ' 138 32% I 1% 1 6 TOTALS f 12 13 TOTAL BLACK uzn a/F TOTAL KKITE TOTfll B/n B/r TOTAL BLACK B/n B/F TOTRL fiHZTE TOTRL TOTRL BLOCK TOTRL UKHE GSRKO TOTAL I 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 100.0 0 0.0 1 ,zc 'a- 2\nI 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 66.7 2 33.3 6 , I2S 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 14 100.0 0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 32 84.2 6 19.8 36 2 100.0 0 0.0 2 9.6 1 100.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 Z.9 34 94.4 2 9.6 36 . i 1 100.0 0 0.0 3 0.0 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 49 91.8 4 8.2 49  0 0.0 0 00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 44 78.6 12 21.4 96 . t. if |s\u0026lt; P'- 0 0.0 3 1.9 1 100.0 0 1 0.0 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.9 174 87.0 26 13.0 200 '6:i 0.5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN KINDERGARTEN. 3.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE FIRST GRADE. 7.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE SECOND GRADE. 19.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE THIRD GRADE. 18.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE FOURTH GRADE. 24.5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS HERE IN THE FIFTH GRADE. 28.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE IN THE SIXTH GRADE. 0 j' ?c Ei'ea \u0026gt;3 ( / \u0026lt; 2 6 e HI cfil 12 Ct c IS 16 18 hf \u0026amp; I' I 1 LIT7L.-. '?OCK SCHOOL OISTKICT \"BTFi 0 F s s H :\u0026gt; o l SthOOL B/B B/F TOIf, TCRr k/n\ni\u0026lt;F TOTftL ' wn TOTfll E/B aOOKFR ARTS fiftCHFT 22i ^mufiiHW '0 .= 0 Q N k 4 1 5 sa.o 20.0 100.C 4 57.1 T  T 4:9  J r- 4 . J 07/09/90 FACE J c 2 = 2:  B c g fil! I m! cij BRftB? Ei.ffltHTfiCT BADGETT UEntHTiIRV n| hCVF.RjOnritKlKTBRV 19 Ce C  l!P is is C  (8 i9 C iS c 3 3 3 3 55\nC- (ih0 c .wsua ? CfifOlER Bftn BflSELIW ElEflEHinSV FOREST PBRK ELEBENTBRV 0 0.0 fl 71.4 1 IM.O 3 y \u0026lt;i:.9 100,0 4 lIO\" 4 \"Wo 0 oTy I? 'TOO. O' 1 103.0 100.0 0 1 s.o 103.0 e 1 80.0 10.0 r 90.0 1 10.0 1 10 10.0 100.0 1 20.0 BO.O 3 MO 2 49.0 2 40.0 5 100.0 21 6 72.4 20.7 27 93.1 1 3.q 1 3.4 2 6.9 29 100.0 1 100.0 100.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION OAT.A 1989-90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER*. 2 elementary school totals L 0 K 6 T E R n EXFULSIUKS T aiB L S G/F TOTAL scsor li/n u/r TOTAL wr TOFftl B/il B/F TOTSL \"rar U/fl U/F lOTtiL UBITE TOTAL TOTAL BUCK TOTAL wan ORBKB TOItL 1 100.0 5 0.0 0 To 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 OT 0 0.0 0 0.0 ic s B 9 ijh i^c 12 Fa U' IS 16 2( 2 fiH 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 7 100.0 0 0.0 7 |C 2^ 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 57.1 3 42.9 1  ZJ c 28 Pc n ' 93 0 To\" 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100 0 0 0.0 4  c JS }e 37 n IC 0.0 0 0.0 c 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 HC II *2 |c 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 r.! ALT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0,0 9 90.0 . 1 10.0 10 |Z is 1^ 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 60.0 2 40.0 3 c KH C ss \u0026gt;0 c 27 93.1 2 6.9 29 IC IS c 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 \u0026gt;3 ^2 ^3 o 7S 0 c'it' ?. c C 7 X3 r s s 7 C t 9 C. n 12 c 5 , '5 - , I 13 21 c 24 2S  C  -HH 27 C 28 30 Q-1 33 94 36 37 .  .'-3' 1 littl\n. rock SCHOOu distkici TTin or SCHOOL SCHOOL B/n B/r tOTAl uraar ti/n U/F TOTAL lOTAt c/n FRBtKLIM ELEBEfiTftRV 4 50.C 4 50.0 4 50. C 4 50.0 8 100.0 Jc471 03/09/90 PAGE ( TJioanrCTRrflRr TT 66.7 33.3 FOO.O \"IT 9.9 0 100.0 eiBCS RhSXU 0 TT 1 168 0 1 1 100.0 100-0 CHICOT ELEf!ETfl.RV 12 100.0 12 100.0 0 12 0.0 100.0 C !5 R8 \u0026gt;9 iG Q11 12 19 c Ifi C 12 9 C 2 n S2 usTEim HILLS nmERTimv JEFFERSOM ILMUFftJW CLOVimE ELERENTHRV 4 66 7 4 66.7 2 33.3 2 33 3 b 100.0 1 1 100.0 100.0 0 8.0 1 100.0 5 2 7 62.5 25.0 87.5 1 1 9 12,5 12.5 100.0 LITTLE ROCK' SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA r989~90 DISTRICT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER:  eLEMeHTARVSCHOOL TOTALS LONG 1 I R n EXPULSIQKS TOTALS B/F TOTAL \"KiiSr 0 0.0 8 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 H/n U/f TOTAL WT lOTSl fi/n B/f TOTAL KRCK u/B /r TOTAL HHITE TOffiL TOTttL BLAOI TOTAL HITE GTIAHO TOTAL 0 0.0 0 0,0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 50.0 4 50.0 8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.8 D 0.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 u 0 0.0 9 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1C0.0 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0  0 0.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 12 0 3.0 0 o.c 0 P.O 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 66.7 2 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.8 0 8.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 87.5 1 12.5 8 2 y 4  G 9   12 f2 12 14 15 IS ' *2 IG n e c c hH c 0 I 24 i! a zi c 2(  2! c HH PC 92 34 sE E EE Z Z a z E E o HH so !2) IE Z P IZ 3^ IE 2 C 31 z c HH C \\v\u0026lt;\ni C  14 C s KBS ILZKENTffRV 3 3 6 42.9 4?.9 85.7 1 14.3 14.3 7 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 85.7 1 14.3 7 c* z z z  31 EIS EZ 3! EE g c o s 0Ba i. 'fi l^. \u0026lt; I ? 5 6 c- ys- t. 12 13 /- - IS 16 16 19 21 C s 24 25 o (\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ZT 28 Cl^ 23 34 c G 36 37' 39 to A' 12 0'2 2 43 t llti ts 46 G  C le 4S \u0026gt;2 G 2 M 55 C 5 LlI' .: KOCK SCHOOL DIS'RICT TR . r r T( H iu\nC- SCHOOL E/n S/F TOTfil TOirK y/n m\u0026gt;F TOTAL snrr lOlfil B/n BnCEILL UEKHK/ IfOlRntLXlR RIRIKTART 1 I 100.0 100.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 JL4V1 0J/^9/9C\u0026gt; PAGE J c- CIYER 5PRIKC3 EICTEBIORV filCHTSELL ELEREHTfiSV ROBIK ELfnLTRRY STEPWKS ElEWHTftRV UASHINOTON ELZnEKTBRy BILSOH ELIBEKTBRy 4 51 (ifis 9 30.Z -^-~ 30.0 r 10,0 T IT 10.0 100.0 5 nio.c 5 TTOTO' 0 5 \"O WOT 100.0 100.0 0 2 0.0 100.0 1 r 1 33.3 66.7 100.0 0 3 0.0 100.0 t 1 2 ifi.a 50.9 100.0 0 2 0.0 100.0 3 1 4 75.0 25.0 100.0 3 75.0 3 75.0 1 25.0 Q 0.0 4 80.0 1 100.0 1 25.0 4 100.0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA r^8990 DISTRICT SUKMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 ELEMEWT AR V~SCHGT^r T^'R'LS LONG 1 E O\" EXPULSIONS T 0 T li I S B/F TOTftL oar u/n W/f TOIfil URnr FOlfll Bzn B/F TCIfll oar U/fl E/F TOTAL -------------------ssnr lOEBL TOTAL TOTfIL WTr CRflKD I !il( 6 9 - I, 12 13 0 0.0 D 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Q.O 1 1M.0 0 0.0 I B OS OS oo SE sC s c c HH G IS 111 III 0 *9 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 W.O 1 10.0 to Is c SE ZE ZE c IS 0 OTO 8 TTO 0 O' 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 100,0 0 u.o 5 I 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 m.o 0 0.0 9 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 100.0 0 0.0 ? EE EE E :e EX S EE EC EE o HH d o aO 8 0.0 0 0.0  0.0 0 0.0 0 co 3 100.0 0 0.0 3 31 ZE 0 0.0 0 0.9 0 9.0 0 0.0 0 6.0 100.0 0 0.0 2 ZE z 31 6 HH O o 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 0 0.0 0 C.O 8 0.0 5 100.0 0 0.0 5 53 ss C Ic 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 e.f} 3 75.0 1 25.0 4 u HH  H  -G' 71 V* 73 74  .3 0 cBB r r i\nC I IITLE r?OCK /ChOOL 01' IHICr ^J471 03/09/90 FACE s 6 s 9 2 c 13 14 ' 0^- 'S Id 19 c,^ 21 12 Cn 24 26 27 28 90 Cii 53 34 96 37 0  SCHOOL B/fl 8/f HOODROrr LLinEftTflkV 1 WTOftlL TEfKV ELCflDfTflRF ISH tLEflEfiTfiRV OTTER CREEK ELEBtKTfiRV SO.Q 14 TiH 8 F SCHOOL TO'fit H/n H/F TOTAL BHTr FOWL B/fl fCO.O 100 9 12 80.0 ZQ.O 3 bb.l 14.3 1 100.0 1 100.0 17 81 0 4 19.0 1 100.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 3 20 0 4 19.0 0 1C9.0 15 100.0 21 100.0 1 0.9 100.0 0 1 0.0 100.0 filsffl E 99 a! * Oh 12 tMKtnELC ELESEKMSV (3 -A- 4i) e 3 100.0 3 100.0 0 0.0 3 100.0 13 96 C  la 19 0 i! 51 52 C i? 54 i5 57 c WftTSOH ELEBEHTftRV 1 1 100.0 100.0 0 0.0 7 87 5 1 100.0 ORflriO TOTALS 144 27 171 75T\"1iy U.i 24 2 26 TfJ to IJ.J 197 WTiT 3\njH3^U.*SE\u0026gt;eXUUUJUJWRiUI LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1 9\u0026amp;9~90' DISTprfCT SUMMARY QUARTER: 1 TO QUARTER: 2 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTALS LOKS T CK'fl IXPULSIOHS T 0 1 fl L S B/F 0 2 T  6 a  10 t2 13 C r e ill TOTAL \"iJM 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Q 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 3 TMjJ 0.0 100.0 H/n H/F TOTAL TOTAL UHITL 8/n B/F TOTAL BLACK itZil K/r IQTfiL IWITC lOTfiL TOTAL BLACK rOTflL WXTC GRAKO roTfit \u0026gt;6 Z( 21 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0  1 22 /  V' 24 2* - c Il '*- 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 12 80.0 3 20.0 IS u * 2S hl h 92 ' 5J 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 81.0 4 19.0 f ' 3S 3{ J7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 !2 ~ 4C  f - (' 4J 4 i H 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 9.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 1 |c 4E 5C / - c SI v-z . 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 100.0 0 0.0 3 2 - ( 99 V \u0026gt;C 0 0.0 0 1 12.3 3 TT 1 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 100.0 0 0,0 8 5: . y y I 52 - (- . [S 1 100.0 6:n66.o 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 I 175 87.1 26 12.0 201 25 76 is 11 c TJk'n.' uuvuli n.-1( MEADOWCLIFF  C *1 Total: Black: White: Other: 438 273 163 2 i 62.0S. 37. OS 1.051 C:\nCt N I 'l.enENIARV SUSPENSION!, lESE Al : S PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSION!. WERE Al  0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT \u0026gt;. S PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT ' 0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT t S PERCE.'iT OF ELEMENTARY SU-SPENSI ON? WERE AT F 1 PULASKI HEIGHTS  R PERCtNT OP l-LtrlKNl APY SUSPENSION' BOOKER IXt-Ml.N i AkY BALE ELrMtNIAHY. BRADY ELEMEHTARY. BADGETT ELEWENTARY. ncDERMOTT ELKnENTARi CARVER Ft ??\nEN1ARY FAIR PARK Total: Black: White: Other: 342 247 92 3 C iJhRE AT BASEL!N 72.0% 27.0% 1.0% A Ei r I't (' lit cl 13\nc ( , 23 25 u N 27 26 sc 5 JC 3 11 C. F C \" 3e 3 IC C ii c |!5 C\n. C I? s 52 C s 55 C !? q: Total: Black: White: Other: 308 213 92 3 69.or 30.051 1.051 0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS UE'RE AT C S PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT El.CHENTARY . fair park'elementary. FOREST park ELEMcNF.ARY . Il ie.K6'-MT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE *1 ' FRANK! IN ELFMENTARY . ! 0 FERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS MERE AT 5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY .SUSPENSIONS WERE AT GARLAND ELEMENTARY. GIBBS ELEMENTARY. : 0 FERCCNT of elementary suspensions UERE at CHICOT ELEMENTARY, : 0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTART SUSPENSIONS MERE AT 5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT ?4 . (T PERrCEHT Or-ELTMENTARY SUSPENSIONS 35 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 5 0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS MERE AT i S PERCENT OP I'LEMENTAR'rTuBpeRSTffRS WERE ST T O .'ERCINT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT E (I rE.RCC.NT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT T . 3-FETTCPNnir\"ELElie\nFTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 00 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE ST 1,0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT I 5' rElTC:NTrOrELEHERTSRY^OSPNS10NS WERE AT 1 0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT S S PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 0 ,Ti FnTTENT0nLEMEirrSRV~SVSPENS10NS VERE AT E,0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT O.S PERCENT OF El.CMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 7 ,S percent Or' tLEME'NTA'RY 'SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 10.4 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 0.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 0 5 percent CF E'LEMENIARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 0.5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT l.S PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT 4.0 PeSCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE AT WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTAL JEFFERSON ELEHENTART. CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY DODD ELEMENTARY. WEADOUCLIFF ELEMENTARY. hTTChell e l e m e nt a RY: KING ELEMENTARY. rockefeller elementary. ^EVER springs ELEMENTARY. PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY. RIGHTSELL ELEMENTARY. R^MINt\" ELEMENTARY. STEPHENS ELEMENTARY. WASHINGTON ELE.MENTARY. Williams ELEMENTARY. WILSON ELEMENTARY. WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY. MABELVALE ELEMENTARY. TERRY ELEMENTARY. FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY, rSH ELEMENTARY. OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY. WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY. WATSON ELEMENTARY. FULBRIGHT Total: Black: White: Other: WILLIAMS Total: Black: White: Other: 11) f- Ml 562 312 241 9 502 261 235 6 55.0% 43.0% 2.0% 52.051 47.0% 1.0% 6 9 inC If r Ies i\u0026amp; EQ E S a   c kH (i. 2? EE 3 iS c c bi z OS Sf-'  3! s\n33 o HH 6 se - G S9 so *61 63 66 67 5( HH  ss n ID .is^-wwgrTry--trag\u0026gt;-TaHtaMMi ,.1 t' i\nI' if .. I K\u0026gt; i= t 'J r (' 2 3 C: C i 9 12 i3 Ce 1,'t f 15 IS 19 C 2 21 i2 24 25 D 27 30 31 13 t' 34 G' 36 37 hH .z 10 oe 42 C  16 C !2 s C i? His- 0 39 I ROCK SCHOOL DIS I  IC'.' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSPENSION DATA 1989*90 DISTRICT SUMMARY bY rfa:\non codes QUARTER: } TO QUARTER: 2 ELEMENTARY LEVEL 0  0 F SCHOOL LONG. TERM n\nc I.' 1 0 3/0 9. 9 r^.GL 1 K\ns IC T 9 eXPULSIOP4 nC il pp I REASON CODE B/M E'F U/M W/F TOTAL B/M B/F W/M W/F TOTAL B/M B/F U/M W/F TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CATEGORY I OFFENSES 1 040 1 0E2 -----------------mr SUBTOTAL TATEGORY-TT OFFENSES SUBTOTAL CATEGORY III OFFENSE^ SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL? ---------5L 72 11 3 ,0 1 0 2 22 8 1 1 0 1 sT a 93 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 93  18 2 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 IBS' I.---. 37 10 I 5!  5 1 IS Z( 21 s IO 24 25 n Z{  2S 2010 2030 2070 2080 21 OC 21 I 0 11 (\u0026gt; 3 3 3 3071 3090 2 2 4 144 1 1 2 27 1 g\" 1 12 1 T 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 4 7 5 1 1 7 5 0 35 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 37 1 1 0 24 73.1 13.7 12.2 2 1 . 0 HG 32 '33 10 36 Io c gO 3 4 7 197 98.0 1 1 1 1 0 0 4 5? I eh ? go 1 ta ta 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9  3! i 3 1 OC . 0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 3 1 .5 1 100.0 0 0. 0 0 0.0 0 0 . 0 1 0.5 201 77.1 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE 18.4 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE 4.5 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE 0.0 PERCENT OF ELEMENTARY SUSPENSIONS WERE CATEGORY I OFFENSES. CATEGORY II OFFENSES. CATEGORY III OFFENSES. CATEGORY IV OFFENSES. 2]      3! S Z z z s z z iE a E tE (C eg 6 i 6 fiK c o 0 3 3 0 hh O . . .ARil J\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":450,"next_page":451,"prev_page":449,"total_pages":3369,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5388,"total_count":40428,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":307},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":37},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":34},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":23},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"worksheets","hits":5},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":4},{"value":"study guides","hits":4},{"value":"learning modules","hits":3},{"value":"slide shows","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"Sound","hits":1050},{"value":"StillImage","hits":803},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":213},{"value":"Collection","hits":10},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2076},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":1425},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":777},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":464},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":397},{"value":"AFL-CIO. Civil Rights Department","hits":326},{"value":"Hunter, Charles N., approximately 1851-1931","hits":323},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":244}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Race relations","hits":4661},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":3223},{"value":"People--Ethnic Groups--Hispanics","hits":2928},{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":2321},{"value":"African Americans","hits":1792},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1747},{"value":"Civil rights--South Carolina","hits":1739},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Mississippi","hits":1550},{"value":"League of United Latin American Citizens","hits":1531},{"value":"LULAC","hits":1517},{"value":"Race","hits":1483}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1501},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1413},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":713},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":639},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":623},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":582},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":582},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":418}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2592},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1497},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":622},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":579},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":360},{"value":"De Laine, Joseph A. (Joseph Armstrong), 1898-1974","hits":345},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":315},{"value":"Samet, Seymour, 1919-2014","hits":279}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1567},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":663},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":386},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":299},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":188},{"value":"Birmingham Bombing (Sixteenth Street Baptist Church)","hits":125},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":104},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":83},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":68},{"value":"Brown versus Board of Education","hits":55},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":43}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":10939},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4304},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":3804},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":3648},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2519},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2032},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1863},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":1801},{"value":"United States, Texas, Harris County, Houston, 29.76328, -95.36327","hits":1564},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":1236},{"value":"United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729","hits":1198}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"South Carolina","hits":6466},{"value":"Georgia","hits":5551},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":3826},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":3452},{"value":"Texas","hits":3432},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":2359},{"value":"Alabama","hits":2352},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1657},{"value":"New York","hits":1561},{"value":"Florida","hits":1185},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":1167}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1962","hits":5885},{"value":"1964","hits":5684},{"value":"1963","hits":5401},{"value":"1965","hits":5249},{"value":"1966","hits":5016},{"value":"1961","hits":4941},{"value":"1968","hits":4914},{"value":"1967","hits":4901},{"value":"1969","hits":4708},{"value":"1960","hits":4681},{"value":"1957","hits":4182},{"value":"1958","hits":4010},{"value":"1977","hits":3976},{"value":"1959","hits":3971},{"value":"1971","hits":3904},{"value":"1970","hits":3870},{"value":"1976","hits":3790},{"value":"1955","hits":3718},{"value":"1974","hits":3664},{"value":"1972","hits":3650},{"value":"1975","hits":3649},{"value":"1956","hits":3611},{"value":"1973","hits":3461},{"value":"1994","hits":3357},{"value":"1995","hits":3332},{"value":"1950","hits":3315},{"value":"1978","hits":3266},{"value":"1954","hits":3261},{"value":"1979","hits":3249},{"value":"1996","hits":3225},{"value":"1980","hits":3158},{"value":"1948","hits":3126},{"value":"1953","hits":3050},{"value":"1997","hits":3036},{"value":"1949","hits":3022},{"value":"1998","hits":2990},{"value":"1999","hits":2983},{"value":"1952","hits":2967},{"value":"1947","hits":2958},{"value":"1951","hits":2907},{"value":"1981","hits":2856},{"value":"2000","hits":2833},{"value":"2001","hits":2792},{"value":"2002","hits":2693},{"value":"1982","hits":2691},{"value":"1946","hits":2690},{"value":"2003","hits":2675},{"value":"1983","hits":2652},{"value":"1945","hits":2610},{"value":"1985","hits":2584},{"value":"1943","hits":2578},{"value":"1944","hits":2577},{"value":"1984","hits":2573},{"value":"1942","hits":2499},{"value":"1941","hits":2473},{"value":"1940","hits":2447},{"value":"1986","hits":2438},{"value":"1939","hits":2375},{"value":"1930","hits":2352},{"value":"1938","hits":2341},{"value":"1937","hits":2323},{"value":"1936","hits":2303},{"value":"2004","hits":2296},{"value":"2005","hits":2270},{"value":"1931","hits":2252},{"value":"1990","hits":2186},{"value":"1987","hits":2183},{"value":"1991","hits":2181},{"value":"1935","hits":2174},{"value":"2006","hits":2165},{"value":"1934","hits":2161},{"value":"1933","hits":2160},{"value":"1932","hits":2150},{"value":"1992","hits":2139},{"value":"1993","hits":2123},{"value":"1989","hits":1879},{"value":"1929","hits":1874},{"value":"1988","hits":1753},{"value":"1928","hits":1509},{"value":"1921","hits":1393},{"value":"1925","hits":1275},{"value":"1927","hits":1272},{"value":"1926","hits":1266},{"value":"1924","hits":1263},{"value":"1923","hits":1208},{"value":"1922","hits":1188},{"value":"1920","hits":1187},{"value":"2007","hits":1029},{"value":"2011","hits":1029},{"value":"2008","hits":1017},{"value":"2010","hits":992},{"value":"2009","hits":980},{"value":"2012","hits":967},{"value":"2013","hits":965},{"value":"2014","hits":924},{"value":"2016","hits":876},{"value":"1919","hits":850},{"value":"1918","hits":849},{"value":"1900","hits":831},{"value":"2015","hits":826}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":301323,"missing":11},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"correspondence","hits":9610},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4200},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3564},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1925},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1690},{"value":"records (documents)","hits":1429},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":1385},{"value":"reports","hits":1362},{"value":"clippings (information artifacts)","hits":1156},{"value":"articles","hits":903},{"value":"transcripts","hits":816}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":13560},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":9168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8110},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6150},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1673},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":1494},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":40},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/","hits":20},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":12},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-OW-EU/1.0/","hits":2},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3271},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1843},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1717},{"value":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","hits":1696},{"value":"Memphis World","hits":1484},{"value":"James W. Silver Collection","hits":1430},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":1423},{"value":"Integration Correspondence","hits":1420},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":1403}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":3821},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":3419},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3316},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3287},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3250},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2174},{"value":"South Carolina Digital Library","hits":2167},{"value":"University of South Carolina. South Carolina Political Collections","hits":1793},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":1663},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":1641},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":1435}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":40191},{"value":"Collection","hits":237}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":40278},{"value":"true","hits":150}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}