{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_606","title":"Monthly meetings with Marie Parker","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School enrollment","Meetings"],"dcterms_title":["Monthly meetings with Marie Parker"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/606"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING December 3,1992 Discussion Topics  Introductions  New incentive school monitoring instrument  Review of the meeting with the Stephens Elementary conununity/ parents  New Futures  Four-Year-Old Long Term Plan  Parent and Conununity Involvement  RecruitingOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 EAST MARKHAM, SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 MEMORANDUM Date: December 3, 1992 From: Jackie To: ODM Staff Subject: Friday Mornings Meeting Below is a List of Names of People accompaning Marie Parker to the meeting. Troy Cole} Becky Rather} -Recruiters Catherine Gill, Parent Involvement Estelle Matthis, ^Pat Price, 4 Year Old Program Diane Woodruff \u0026lt;\u0026gt;-Janet Bernard Marie Parker called and asked that I give this information to Staff Members.OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING December 1992 Discussion Topics  Introductions  New incentive school monitoring instrument  Review of the meeting with the Stephens Elementary conmmnity/ parents  New Futures  Four-Year-Old Long Term Plan  Parent and Coimnunity Involvement  RecruitingOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING iMaty December-8,1993 Discussion Topics Long Term Four-Year-Old Plan Incentive Schools Staffing Needs Assessment Kings Attendance Zone and Recruitment Biracial Committee/Parent Council Stay Request December 30, 1992 Budget Cuts Ordera FEB 19 1993 Office of Desegregation Koni FORMULA FOR CALCULATING ACCEPTABLE RACIAL RANGE 1993-94 mg Basis of calculations: October 1, 1992 enrollment Elementary: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Total 14,003 2,057 Area School Enrl. 11,946 Black 8994 1140 7854 %Black 64 55.42 65.75 65.75 X .125 8.22 73.97 74.00% Maximum Black % 40.00% Minimum Black % (Set by Plan) Junior High: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Area School Enrl. 6166 849 5317 4138 505 3633 67 59.48 68.33 68.33 X .125 8 . Sli, 76.Q7 76.75% Maximum Black % 68.33 X .25 = 17.08 51.25% Minimum Black % Senior High: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Area School Enrl. 5632 871 4761 3378 501 2877 60 57.52 60.43 60.43 X .125 7.55 67.98 68.00% Maximum Black % 60.43 X .25 15.11 45.32 45.50% Minimum Black %OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING November 6,1992 Discussion Topics  Introductions/ ODM Overview  Incentive School Principals Meeting  Four-Year-Old Long Tenn Plan  Act 908 (Counselors Law)  Incentive Schools Staffing Needs Assessment Recommended Postions Themes Parent Recruiters Parent Council  Public Relations (Interdistrict Plan)  Biracial Committee Monitoring Report1 f^ 1. t i 1 i, I! **^^ 3 . 1 it \u0026lt;C4st^\u0026lt;2- 14- / J I I y^-3 !1 i^'2\u0026lt;a-^ 'C... ( *t 5 I 7\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_p15728coll3_429277","title":"National Dunbar Alumni Association newsletters","collection_id":"bcas_p15728coll3","collection_title":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, California, 37.25022, -119.75126","United States, California, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, 34.05223, -118.24368"],"dcterms_creator":["National Dunbar Alumni Association of Little Rock, Arkansas"],"dc_date":["1992/2003"],"dcterms_description":["Newsletters from the National Dunbar Alumni Association.","This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : University of Arkansas at Little Rock Center for Arkansas History and Culture"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["National Dunbar Alumni Association historical collection, 1880-2016 (UALR.MS.0021)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Arkansas--Little Rock","Dunbar High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Education, Secondary","Segregation in education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Class reunions"],"dcterms_title":["National Dunbar Alumni Association newsletters"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15728coll3/id/429277"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"usm_oh_mus-coh-simpsonj","title":"Oral history with James C. Simpson","collection_id":"usm_oh","collection_title":"Oral History","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036"],"dcterms_creator":["Bolton, Charles C","Simpson, James C., 1930-1994"],"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":["Oral history.; Interviews conducted on May 11 and 12, 1992 with James C. Simpson (1930-1994). Simpson was elected to the Mississippi House of Representatives from Harrison County in 1964. He served six more consecutive terms covering more than 20 years.","Electronic version made available through a National Leadership Grant for Libraries from the Institute for Museum and Library Services to the University of Southern Mississippi.","This item is part of the Civil Rights in Mississippi Digital Archive."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights workers","Civil rights movement"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history with James C. Simpson"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://usm.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_9675f022-30e8-45c7-b06a-d215688478eb"],"dcterms_temporal":["1960/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["University Libraries provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. When possible, we have provided information regarding the copyright right status of an item; however, the information we have may not be accurate or complete. Obtaining permissions to publish or otherwise use is the sole responsibility of the user."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Simpson, James C., 1930-1994--Interviews"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"usm_oh_mus-coh-newmanc","title":"Oral history with Mr. C.B. Newman","collection_id":"usm_oh","collection_title":"Oral History","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036"],"dcterms_creator":["Bolton, Charles C","Newman, Clarence Benton, 1921-","Derr, Reid"],"dc_date":["1992-1993"],"dcterms_description":["Oral history.; Two interviews conducted on June 18, 1992 and March 9, 1993 with Mr. C.B. \"Buddie\" Newman at his home in Valley Park, Mississippi. Newman was born on May 8, 1921 in Valley Park, Mississippi. In 1942, he left his job with the Southern Natural Gas Company to serve in the army during World War II. After the war, Newman returned to his job and began farming in Issaquena County, Mississippi. In 1948, he was elected to the state Senate. After one term in the Senate, Newman ran and was elected to the Mississippi House of Representatives. For the next thirty-six years, he remained in the House. During his tenure, Newman was chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, chairman of the Southern Council of State Governments, and Speaker Pro Tempore of the House. Newman also served for twelve years as Speaker of the House.","Electronic version made available through a National Leadership Grant for Libraries from the Institute for Museum and Library Services.","This item is part of the Civil Rights in Mississippi Digital Archive."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights workers","Civil rights movement"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history with Mr. C.B. Newman"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://usm.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_fecc9f08-4434-4787-a013-419039683dc6"],"dcterms_temporal":["1950/1979"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["University Libraries provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. When possible, we have provided information regarding the copyright right status of an item; however, the information we have may not be accurate or complete. Obtaining permissions to publish or otherwise use is the sole responsibility of the user."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Newman, Clarence Benton, 1921- --Interviews"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"usm_oh_mus-coh-knightt","title":"Oral history with Mr. Thomas Knight, Sr.","collection_id":"usm_oh","collection_title":"Oral History","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036"],"dcterms_creator":["Bolton, Charles C","Knight, Thomas, 1920-"],"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":["Oral history.; Two interviews conducted on February 7 and 21, 1992 with Mr. Thomas Knight Sr. at the University of Southern Mississippi.Knight was born on July 9, 1920 near Hattiesburg, Mississippi. In 1941, he began working at the Reliance Manufacturing Company in Hattiesburg.While working there he was instrumental in organizing Local Union No. 563 of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America.After he resigned his position as full-time representative of the union, Knight became an officer of the Hattiesburg Central Labor Council and was an active lobbyist of the Mississippi legislature. In 1957, he participated in negotiations to merge the Mississippi AFL and the Mississippi CIO. In 1960, he was elected to the full-time position of secretary-treasurer. He served in that position until 1986 when he was elected president of the Mississippi AFL-CIO.","Electronic version made available through a National Leadership Grant for Libraries from the Institute for Museum and Library Services.","This item is part of the Civil Rights in Mississippi Digital Archive."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights workers","Civil rights movement"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history with Mr. Thomas Knight, Sr."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Southern Mississippi. Center for Oral History and Cultural Heritage"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://usm.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_5eb87e59-f4db-4c81-9293-0c3b72f0f1d1"],"dcterms_temporal":["1950/1979"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["University Libraries provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. When possible, we have provided information regarding the copyright right status of an item; however, the information we have may not be accurate or complete. Obtaining permissions to publish or otherwise use is the sole responsibility of the user."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Knight, Thomas, 1920- --Interviews"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_660","title":"Organization structure chart","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","School employees","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Organization structure chart"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/660"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS July 1, 1992 JUL 9 1992 TO: FROM: Boaxd, of Directors C.'^mT\"Bernd, Superintendent of Schools Office of Desegregation Monitoring SUBJECT: EMPLOYMENT OF NEW ADMINISTRATORS I recommend that the Board approve the employment of the following individuals: Janet L. Bernard as Associate Superintendent of School Operations and Climate, effective August 1, 1992, at an annual salary of $68,900 plus car allowance of $1200 per year\nMarie Parker as Associate Superintendent for Organizational and Learning Equity, effective July 27, 1992, at an annual salary of $65,000 plus car allowance of $1200 per year. Estelle Matthis as Associate Superintendent for Educational Programs and Learning Improvement, at an annual salary of $65,000 plus car allowance of $1200 per year. I am attaching biographical information on Ms. Parker. Bernard and Ms. In addition. I am recommending that the Board appoint Earl M. (Chip) Jones as Interim Manager of Support Services at an annual salary equivalent to $60,000, prorated for the number of days he serves in this position. 1, 1992. Mr. Jones' appointment is effective JulyRESOLUTION TO REFINANCE BONDS\nDr. Bernd explained that the District can save approximately $323,632 by refinancing the May 15, 1988 bonds. He recommended that the Board adopt the Resolution authorizing Stephens, Inc. to file application with the State Board of Education to issue bonds in the estimated amount of $5,500,000 for the purpose of refunding the District's bonds issue dated May 15, 1988. moved adoption of the Resolution. Mr. John Moore motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Dorsey Jackson seconded the attached to these minutes and made a part hereof. A copy of the Resolution is RESOLUTION ON POLICE RESOURCE OFFICER: Dr. Bernd recommended that the Board adopt the Resolution reiterating its commitment to the Police Resource Officer Program which was approved by the Board of Directors on December 19, 1991. Mr. Dorsey Jackson moved adoption of the Resolution. Ms. Pat Gee seconded the motion, and it carried five (5) to two (2), with Mr. Hamilton and Dr. Mitchell casting the dissenting votes. A copy of the Resolution is attached to these minutes and made a part hereof. APPOINTMENT OF ACTING ASST. SUPERINTENDENT FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS\nDr. Bernd recommended that Sam Stueart be appointed Acting Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools effective October 19, 1992, at a salary of $50,128 plus $1200 per year car allowance. Ms. Pat Gee moved the Superintendent's recommendation. Mr. John Moore seconded the motion, and it carried with five affirmative votes. Dr. Katherine Mitchell and Mr. Bill Hamilton abstained. ADJOURNMENT\nMr. Dorsey Jackson moved to adjourn, the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. John Moore seconded ___________________ _ There being no further business to come before the special meeting, the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. 0. 0 : JaaSveTTi\"^ PPrreesident Pat Gee, Secretary APPROVED: SLIP SHEET FOR REGULAR BOARD MEETING ON AUGUST 27, 1992 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS w' .m SB J3 ci Sases-'. H 1 August 27, 1992 TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. M. Bernd, Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: EMPLOYMENT OF MANAGER OF RESOURCES AND SCHOOL SUPPORT I am pleased to recommend the employment of Gary E. Jones as Manager of Resources and School Support at a salary of $65,000 plus $1200 car allov/ance effective September 14, 1992. A copy of Mr. Jones' resume' is attached for your review. POP*, 3 -x \u0026lt;53? WED Office SEP 1 M2 of Dososregation Monitoring TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS June 24, 1993 Board of Directors 72201 JUN 2 5 1993 OSiice of Desegregation Monttonng bD FROM: SUBJECT: C. M. (Mac) Bernd, Superintendent of SchoolscSJ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS POSITION I recommend that Ms. Jeanette Wagner be appointed Director of Communications effective July 1, 1993 on the Administrative Non- Certified Salary Schedule at 04-7, which is a salary of $40,080.00 for the 1992-93 school year.EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN DR. CLOYDE M. BERND AND THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS This employment contract is made and entered into this twenty second day of May, 1992 by and between the Little Rock School District Board of Directors (hereinafter referred to as and Dr. II Cloyde M. Bernd Superintendent\"). (hereinafter referred \"Board\"), to as WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide the Little Rock School District Superintendent with a written employment contract in order to enhance administrative stability and continuity within the Little Rock School District, which the Board believes improves the quality of its overall educational program\nand. WHEREAS, the Board and Superintendent believe that written employment contract is necessary to specifically describe their relationship and to serve as the basis of effective communication between them as they fulfill their covenants and administrative functions District\nin the operation of the educational program of the a NOW THEREFORE, the Board and Superintendent, for the consideration herein specified, agree as follows: 1. Term The Contract shall be from the starting date until June 30, 1995. It is mutually understood and agreed between the Board and Superintendent that in the absence of a written notice from one to the other of an intention not to renew this contract, such notice to be given by the parties hereto not sooner than October 31 and not later than December 31 of each calendar year, this Contract shall be automatically extended and kept in full force and effect subject to all its terms and conditions for a three year term commencing on the following July 1. Service of notice shall be by hand delivery or by certified mail, return receipt requested. Should the Superintendent be able to work for the Board prior to July 1, 1992, the Board shall pay for this work on a per diem basis calculated from the Superintendent's annual salary. Travel for the Superintendent to accomplish this work shall be paid for by the Board and shall not count as the \"house hunting\" discussed in Paragraph 3b. below unless the Superintendent's spouse accompanies him on such trips. 2 . Salary The Board shall pay the Superintendent an annual salary of $110,000.00 payable in equal monthly installments for the 1992-93 school fiscal year. JPersonnel Changes Page 5 June 24, 1993 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Resiqnations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Taylor, Alexander Reason: None Given Bus Driver Transpoirtation 5-13-93 3-10 9 $ 36.40 per day I Thompson, Tina Reason: Terminated Woods, Kimberly Reason: Medical Abrams, Annie Beasley, Christine Bryant, Axie Myers, Nona Randel, Charlott Spurgeon, Helen Stone, Martha Whiteside, Ida Bus Driver Transportation Custodian McClellan 5-21-93 5-22-93 Retirees Coordinator PAC Nurse Rightsell Secretary Mann Secretary Special Ed Media Clerk Wilson Secretary P/Personnel Secretary Mabelvale Jr Inst Aide Adult Ed 6-15-93 6-14-93 6-16-93 6-30-93 6-14-93 6-30-93 6-25-93 6-10-93 3-10 9 1-01 9.25 7-13 10 2-15 9.25 3-14 10 4-14 12 1-14 9.25 4-14 12 4-14 11.50 5-05 9.25 $ 36.40 per day $7,993 $22,965 $31,416 $15,362 $21,066 $14,484 $16,239 $16,239 $16,768 52.I Personnel Changes Page 2 September 23, 1993 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS Resiqnations/Terminations Certified Employees Patty, Barbara Reason: Accepted Another Position Pearson, Susan Reason: Relocating Purdy, Milton Reason: Accepted Another Position Quattlebaum, Steven Reason: Personal Rule, Elizabeth Reason: Accepted Another Position Smith, Natalie Reason: Personal Vanbibber, Cynthia Reason: Personal Wallace, Yulonda Reason: Personal Fike, Sarah Hardin, Richard Koehler, Yvonne Wood, Dianne SALARY Fifth Grade Pul Hgts Jr Counselor Wakefield Voc Elec Metropolitan Civics Mabelvale Jr French Central Sixth Grade Pul Hgts Elem Lrng Fnd Forest Hgts Sixth Grade Forest Park 8-13-93 8-12-93 7-30-93 6-14-93 8-9-93 7-31-93 9-10-93 8-11-93 Retirees Sixth Grade Chicot Music Parkview Phy Ed Booker Math Supv IRC 8-13-93 8-10-93 8-12-93 8-20-93 5-06 9.25 4-08 9.25 1-16 10 4-10 9.25 4-14 9.25 1-03 9.25 1-01 9.25 1-06 9.25 6-20 9.25 3-17 9.25 6-20 9.25 3-20 11 $28,324 $28,846 $32,118 $30,452 $33,664 $21,680 $20,074 $24,089 $40,670 $35,009 $40,670 $50,225 31.\u0026lt;! WILSON JONES COMPANY T70a0UF I PfcparecBy I\nApproved 3y j\ntniikus I Date J L I I J HUOE FH U.S\u0026gt;. ~ r I I- t ! '' h 3 1 C.7^t/4lJJSi4 ll 5 :c ie 1? 2C 21 ii II  L.^^ 7ffr/^C k/b\u0026gt;o^j I L n .1 Ik^z ' r 7,3 y^r/^L - II li'^ZlP A-^  rz ??^ d-  I* u 54^: xl /f  i yW J5S^ to 06 k'jrl^zi b !\u0026gt; II _____LIS^\u0026amp;4 C^^Accoai il i L !^\u0026lt;^^'=^\n ^AU^y i |! ill 1,5^:^^ ^/O^r) C/yt/^Ldd 5]WI^j J___I \n '^) CATtAcuyu I 7c (2/h^/ka\u0026gt;j T'o'ryf-L.  l\n|_____1 I i i| __i li-a/ ll 7o'7\u0026gt;}-(^ !! ^7^^ O'O DO \u0026gt;D  I lifeg 3 oo| i lal/1teL\nl I H\n5^^l^jL 155^^ y3\u0026lt;y.... ' .^S, - /,A^__. . iJt,- ..a^iiiLiiM Id44^ oc JIW^ '773. : pcJ ? f}'' f Ml. Jjs OT gi J___1^ ^^11 I 1$^ \u0026lt;^1 i ' lyblct*^ LL^ 1 II I  ^z:g\u0026gt;^^li I I 1 I il IL k5Wo!i 11:1! 11 tQ\u0026gt;iS\u0026gt; 3^. /,.^.x\u0026gt; jc. y/T 1 S'- I a? I ! I :4l3^^^i ^LzB/I^p^^ IM .1 II! '.c-/tl X. '^7'1 ^19. 0 erC !o2^  / Joo tiiI Communications I Assoc Supt I Oganizational \u0026amp; Lmmrig Equity J Ltiectivo Schools Sluders AssignmerS I Monitors j M ~ tmplementaiiorV Plannmg * EvatuMexi VeKrrteers si PvUc Schools Betore- \u0026lt; .^er School CARE L Parers ReouitmerS Parers Coordinator BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent 1 ITumair? As\u0026amp;tK. Sijpl. School Opera*. \u0026amp;C\u0026amp;rnate Hsaring Oflicor Ami SifS. Ele me rS ary 15 Schools Principale Teachers I WieetShre Schoote(7) Awl. 8^S. Elementary 14 Sdhoob Asel. Supi. Reading Language Sdanoa Principals PHncftal* Mathematics Teachers Teachers New Figures Atttletica Aflerrulhra Learning Sociel Slucfies Re sources/ ^abgHJsIgignB Assoc. Sl\u0026lt;3t I CtarfaAimA I LiminOhtpwmiJ Rne bstmctioruri Technology Physical Education Ovgt Heatih Education EarV Childhood Shdt Oevelopmenl Little Rock School District Organizational Structure September 1992 1 ' Manager Rasouroes \u0026amp; School S(\u0026lt;f\u0026gt;on I Vocatiofwy ConlroKer R.sk Wan ager*ient _ Federal Programs/ Grants FaoMas Services Procurement Eiceptiortal Children AduH Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Food Services Secunty ate Piocvse.ng 1 I I I Assoc. Supt Organizational \u0026amp; Laming Equity I Effective Schools Student Assignment I Monrtorirtg \u0026amp;  ImplementatiorV desegregation Plan I Communications I Assoc. Supt. School Operat. \u0026amp;Cfrnate Hearing Officer Asst. Supt. Elementaiy 15 Schools Planning \u0026amp; Evaluation Principals Volunteers in Public Schools Teachers Before* \u0026amp; After-School CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent I 1 11 I Schools (7) r Asst. Supt. Elementary 14 Schools Principals Teachers Reading 1 Asst. Supt. Secondary 13 Schools T Prirtcipals Teachers New Futures Athletics Ahematrve Learning Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies Human Resources/ Labor Relations Assoc. Supt. Curriculum \u0026amp; I Loaming Imprymt. I Fine Arts Irtstrudional Technology Physicat Education Drug \u0026amp; Health Education Early Childhood Staff Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure APRIL 1993 1 Manager Resources \u0026amp; School Stpport I Vocational Controller _ Federal Programs/ Grants Facilities Services Procurement Exceptional Children Adult Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Security/Risk Management Food Services Information Services Board of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 6 table the Proposal for \"President's Day\" Holiday, seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Ms. Pat Gee B. Approval of Custodian's Agreement Ms, Pat Gee moved to remove from the table the matter of the Custodian's Agreement. and it carried four (4) to two (2) . Mr. Bill Hamilton seconded the motion, John Riggs voted in opposition to the motion. Mr. Dorsey Jackson and Mr. Discussion ensued concerning the financial condition of the District and the financial ramifications of the Custodian's Agreement. Following discussion, Ms. Pat Gee moved to accept the agreement with the custodians. motion, and it carried four (4) to two (2) . Jackson voted in opposition to the motion. Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the Mr. Riggs and Mr. C. Approval of Bus Driver's Agreement Ms. Pat Gee moved to remove from the table the matter of the Bus Driver's Agreement. and it carried four (4) to two (2) . voted in opposition of the motion. Mr. Bill Hamilton seconded the motion. Mr. Riggs and Mr. Jackson Discussion ensued in which the same concerns were expressed concerning the financial condition of the District and the financial implications of the Bus Driver Agreement. Hamilton moved to approve the Bus Driver Agreement. Mr. Bill Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried four (4) to two (2). Mr. Riggs and Mr. Jackson voted in opposition to the motion. D. Approval of Agreement on Central High Wellness Clinic Mr. Hamilton moved to approve the Agreement as reflected in the printed agenda. and it carried five (5) to one (1) . opposition to the motion. Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the motion. Mr. John Moore voted in E. Administrative Salaries Dr. Bernd directed the Board members' attention to the slip sheet on administrative salaries and recommended that the Board adopt the following: A $68,000 annual salary for the positions of Associate Superintendent and Manager of ResourcesBoard of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 7 and School Support for FY 1993-94\nA $61,000 Assistant annual Superintendent, salary for the positions of Controller, Student Hearing Officer, and Desegregation Facilitator\nA 1.5 percent base salary increase for all 12-month administrators for FY 1993-94\nA 250 day contract for all 12-month administrators with paid vacation days based on experience in LRSD and PCSSD of 15 days for 0-7 years of service\n20 days for 8-14 years of service\nand 25 days for 15 or more years of service. A 3 percent base salary increase for all administrators on a less than 12-month contract\nand The ability for administrators to accumulate sick leave up to contract. the length of the individual's informed the Dr. is Bernd Board that the Principal's supportive of the pay proposal as outlined. explained that he felt this pay proposal would allow the District Roundtable He to attract quality candidates for top administrative positions. on the budget. the proposal. Discussion ensued concerning the proposal and its impact After discussion, the chair called for a vote on There was no motion nor second, however, the vote on the issue carried five (5) to one (1). Mr. John Riaas voted \"hav \" Mr. John Riggs voted \"nay. June 24, F. 1993-94 Budget Dr. Bernd reviewed the information sent to the Board 1993 marked \"Corrected\" in which he summarized . on the requested budget changes since the submission of the April 26, 1993 tentative budget. The chair asked Board members to state any opposition to a specific item included in the proposed budget. Discussion ensued concerning specific items included in the proposed budget, following which Mr. Jackson moved to adopt the proposed budget with the exception of the $280,000 for police resource officers and the $160,000 for the four assistant principals at incentive schools. for and it carried five (5) Ms. to one (1) . Pat Gee seconded the motion, Mr. John Riggs voted inNAME Linda Watson Othello Faison Leon Adams Mary Jane Cheatham Lavanna Wilson J ' \u0026amp; FROM Student Hearing Officer Alter. Learning Center Fed. Programs/Grants Baseline Elem. Bale Elem. TO J.A. Fair Asst. Principal Coordinator Fed. Program/Grants Arts, Music \u0026amp; Technology Transportation Hippy /Early Childhood  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JULY 28, 1994 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dr. Ricf? Director of Human Resources THROUGH: Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent SUBJECT: Administrative Transfers reassignments of individuals have been completed and are presented for your information. NAME FROM TO Linda Brown Asst. Prin. PHJ Asst. Prin. Mann Othello Faison Principal Alt. Lrng. Center Coordinator Federal Programs Dennis Glasgow Supervisor Science Director IRC \u0026amp; Science/ Acting Director Mathematics Ed Jackson Unassigned Act/Parent Coord Office of Deseg Gene Parker Supervisor Eng/F Lang Acting Director Reading/L-Arts\nF/Lang \u0026amp; ESL Larry Robertson Asst. Supt. Elementary Asst. Supt.'^'^^^^' Student HearingZ .C'U-k Vera Robinson Asst. Prin. Jefferson Asst. Prin. Watson Anna Joiner-Tatum Asst. Prin. Watson Asst. Prin. JeffersonRoger N. Williams Asst. Prin. Henderson Asst. Prin. Mabelvale Jr. Marion Woods Specialist Staff Development Acting Director Staff Developmentr\u0026gt; Regular Board Meeting September 22, 1994 Page 8 The Board returned from Executive Session at 8:45 and reported that no action was taken. p.m. The Superintendent recommended the following personnel changes which were presented on a slip sheet: MAME FROM TO Sadie Mitchell Principal King Acting Asst. Supt. Elementary Tyrone Harris Asst. Principal Terry Elem. Acting Principal King Elementary Othello Faison Coordinator Federal Programs Assist. Prin. Hall High School James Washington Asst. Prin. Hall High School Acting Prin. Henderson Jr. High Karen Buchanan Principal Henderson Jr. High Temporarily Assigned Student Office Assignment Dr. Edwin Jackson Prin. on Special Assignment - Student Assignment Office Principal on Special Assignment - Staff Development Betty Burr Assistant Prin. Fair High School Acting Asst. Voc. Director Metropolitan The following additional personnel changes were recommended: Arbadella Smith Assist. Principal McDermott Robert Jones  Director of Safety and Security Alicia Finch Acting Asst. Prin. Fair High School Jacovelli moved that the items recommended by the Superintendent on personnel be approved as presented, seconded by Ms. Gee, and it carried unanimously. Ms.SLIP SHEET TO REGULAR BOARD AGENDA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS n? ?  January 27, 1994 21994 To: From: Brady Gadberry, Board of Directors or, Human Resources Through: Hen lliams. Superintendent of Schools Subject: Personnel Changes I recommend the approval of the following employment of new staff at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications: NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Glowers, Robert Director PRE 1-28-94 6-06 12 E/Stip C/A $22,423.48 1,362.50 408.75 (pro-rated) Hurley, Richard Director Human Resources 2-21-94 ADMUNC 12 C/A $28,287.81 348.75 (pro-rated) Modeste, Leon Sp/Asst/Supt Admin 2-21-94 6-18 12 C/A $22,984.95 348.75 (pro-rated) Personnel Changes Page 2 July 23, 1992 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Ray, Jim Reason: None Given Bus Driver Transportation 6-5-92 3-02 9 $ 44.24 per day Scott, Chantra Reason: Terminated Bus Driver Transportation 6-12-92 3-01 9 $ 41.70 per day Smith\" Gladys Reason: None Given Food Service Gari and 5-20-92 1-01 9 $ 6.22 per hour Tate, Erma Reason: None Given Supv Aide Watson 4-24-92 25-3 9 $ 5.05 per hour Harris, William Montgomery, Bradford Runyan, Debra New Non-Certified Employees Glazier Mai ntenance Di rector Transportation Secretary Plant Services 6-29-92 7-20-92 6-8-92 6-01 12 6-07 12 3-04 12 $18,490 $44,677.50 pro-rated $14,234 i I II Board of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 Jeanette Wa?Ser ^P^-^i\"tendent appointed as Director of appointed as Princinai  - - School, that Teresa r Carter be 10 recommended that Personnel, that Lilly ' i T_T.... 4 J , sss. Lan Mahony and the retirement of Da^z^i J  ' --.oa.yi,auxui on elip sheets provided to  Superintendent slip sheets Principal at Watson approve the resignation of provided to the Board in recc^nded that the Board approve the pS^onnei printed agenda. Mr. John Rigjs Pst Gee seconded changes that are contained in the moved the Superintendent's the motion, and it carried the room when the VI. Board. Board are the recommendation. vote was taken. report agenda A. Mr. J^nanimously. Mr. John Moore Desegregation Report Mr. Marvin Zimmerman development report to the exceeded the state members asked B. was out of Board. presented the 1992-93 annual staff requirements for%tafthat the District has questions. elopment hours. Board hours. Status Report This report was given during the section on the agenda. C. Progress Report: H Remarks From Citizens\" Garland Incentive School black males in his school^^and ^^^jj^e^te^d Progress of allowing him to spend his budget on aonrrmri s assistance in school. Board members asked questions!^ materials for his on the VII. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. ___ John Riggs moved consent agenda, r x\\.j.ggs moved approval of all t-ho -i-i- rried Mtchm seconded^S^^S\n, The items approved by the foregoing motion were: (A) Adoption of Policy BDDB, (B) \"School Board Agenda.\" Approval T the submission Local Application of the Carl to the Vocational Perkins and TechnicalLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS TO: FROM: Board of Directors Brady Gadherzry, Di THROUGH: He: aril. SUBJECT: Pers el C November 4, 1993 Human Resources imfeSuperintendent of Schools inges 7 I recommend the approval of the following employment indicated position, salary and classification: of new staff at the NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Glowers, Robert PRE Specialist 11-23-93 PRE 2-06 $20,297.50 , 10.5 Ed/ S t-17786.25 C/A 526.25 (pro-rated) I Assoc. Supt Organizational \u0026amp; Learning Equity T Effective Schoob Student Assignment I Monitonng \u0026amp;  ImplementaliorV ubse^regatior^^ Plamir^g \u0026amp; Evaluation Volunteers in Public Schoob Before- A After-School CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator I Communicat ions I Assoc. Sqpl. School OperaL \u0026amp; Cfrnata Hearing Officer Asst Supt. Elementary 15 Schoob Principals Teachers ktcentfve Schools (7) Asst. Supt. Elementary 14 Schools Principals Teachers 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent I Reading 1 Asst. Supt. Secondary 13 Schools J Principals Teachers New Futures Athletics Ahemalive Learning Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies Human Resources/ Labor Relattons Assoc. S(J0. Curriolumi I Leaning Imprvmt.l Fine Arts Instnxtional Technology Physicd Education Drug \u0026amp; Health Education Early Childhood Staff Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure APRIL 1993 1 Manager Resources \u0026amp; School Sqcporl 1 Vocational Controller _ Federal ProgramaZ Grants Facilities Services Procurement Exceptional Children Adult Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Security/Risk Management Food Services Information Services RECEIVED JUL 2 G LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 July 15, 1993 TO: Mrs. Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: e Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE VACANCIES This communication is a follow-up of the productive meeting that Jerry Malone and I had with you in your office on July 9, 1993. I am providing you a listing of the people who are currently performing responsibilities that were assigned to the top administrators who recently resigned from the District and/or returned to another assignment: Vacated Position Assigned Responsibilities Superintendent Estelle Matthis Assoc. Supt. for School Operations Estelle Matthis (with advice and counsel from Jerry Malone) Assoc. Supt. for Curriculum Dennis Glasgow Manager of Support Services Jerry Malone (providing primary advice and counsel to Mark Milhollen) Asst. Supt.-Secondary Schools Victor Anderson Limited Science Supervisory Activities Annita Paul Mark Milhollen will consult with Bill Mooney on financial matters. The assistant superintendents report directly to me on a daily basis. The assistant superintendents will assume supervisory roles for the Incentive Schools.Maria Palter r ^eanalle WagrMr Communicalions I I ToBeAnnexneed AssockSid, SchodCpei^ BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Estells Manhi* Inlerlm Superintendent I Brady Oadberry Labor Relations I Estate Matthis Assoa D J CurlciMuin 'StLrdent Asejgnment T Rudolph Howard Hearing Offtesr Arma Hart Desegregation Rteilrtator 1 4 Alice Stovall Reading ] { *Rne Arts Debbie Milam Volunteers In Pubilo Settle Margaret Gremillior Aset. Supt.. Elem. ISSchoota Lany S. Roberteon Aset. Supt.. Bern. 14 Schools I To Be irwuncsd Gone Parker PdncFpote I Supt., Seo. 13 Sdioole ? I  Arte/ Foreign L^uage - Dennis GJasgow Principals Inatrudiorml Techrwlogy ] } 4 Mariha Rodgers Balore- \u0026amp; After- School CARE Sdenoe terL Teachers Teachers Principals Teachers Physical Education DiartneWood MaJhomatl( Jo Evelyn Elston Drug location L Werie A McNeaJ BecbRafhw I  Pannt Bacruitmentl Ooofdinator | Social Studies Pal Price Jncerrtivo Schools \u0026lt;7) Linda Young New Futures Early Childhood _ OonitaHudspoih ^herine Gill Parent Coordinator ] Responsibaily of Appropriate Associate Superinteadeitl SioK Development Athletics Othello Prison AAemathre Leamrno Fy Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 1 To Be Announced HumanResources Carol Green Yocalionai Leon Adama 1 ToBaAnnounoad Man^ReeoKss and Scind Support I 1 _ MarfcMillholfen Controner jPecieri Programa^ Grarrta [ Doug Eatpn Fadlitlea Servicae Charfle NeaJ Procursment Dr. Palty .Kohlor Ibnal Iren PaUehe Uprlln _  *w ivapuiMi Adub Education- 1 _ Brad Morilgo^ry Transporlalton . Lucy Lyon Library Services JacMeBoyMn Food^rvicea Bill Bamhousa SecvrityyRtsk ^an^gmenrt Dave Kngselia Wofmabon BeniceiAnn Brown Memo July 15, 1993 Page 2 The role and responsibilities of Desegregation Facilitator have been clarified and Mrs. Arma Hart will relocate to the Desegregation Office at 501 Sherman in a timely manner. (See Organizational Chart) Bill Mooney will continue to provide technical assistance. Interviews will be held to select principals for the following schools: July 15, July 20, July 21, 1993 1993 1993 Central High School Wakefield Elementary Mitchell Incentive School Mary Jane Cheatham, who is returning from a sabbatical, has been assigned to Baseline Elementary School. The District will need to advertise and select an Assistant Superintendent for secondary schools by the end of August, 1993. These responsibilities cannot be performed by Victor Anderson after school starts. You were most cordial and helpful during our visits. We will make every effort to respond to your concerns and requests in a timely manner. If additional information is needed, please contact me. /bjf cc: Board of DirectorsBoard Of Directors I Dr. Henry P, Williams Superintendent To Be Announced Special Assistfitt to Supt Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Dr. Russ Mayo Assoc. Superintendent lor Desegregation I Sterling Ingram Assodaa tor Instruction to the Deputy Supetlrrtendent Jeanette Wagner Communications I 1 'Student Assignment Margaret QremlNton Larry S. Robertson Asst Suit, Elm. r- AsstStptElem. 16 Schools 14 Schools Dr. Victor Anderson Acting Asst Supt., Sk. 13 Schools Alice Stovall Reading Arma Hart Desegregation Fadiitator Debbie Milam Volunteers in Public School Principals Principals Principals Gene Parker - Lar^uage Arts/ Foreign Language _ Dennis Glasgow Science Bedw Rather  Parent Rreeccrruurittmmeeint Coordinator Parent Involvement Brad Montgomery Transportation I I Teachers Teachers Teachers _ To Be Announced Mathematics Incertrve Schools Urxla Yotrng New Futures 'Athletics Othello Faison Alternative Learning Center Responsibility of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Dr. Linda Watson Hearing Officer Catherine Gill Parent Involvement Rne Arts 'tnstnjctional Technology physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil ^rvices Pat Price Early Childhood Donita Hudspeth Stall Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure December 2,1993 DRAFT #4 Mark MIhollen Acting Manager lor Support Senricss Carol Green Vocational Education Financial Services Leon Adams  Federal Programs/ Grants _ Dr. Patty Kohler Ex Coptic Childe trorral ren Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services Doug Eaton Facilities Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procuremertt Bill Bamhouse Security/Risk Manaoement To Be Announced! Planning, Research and Evaluation I Dave Ki I InkxTTti ^ingsella Tallon Slices I Busness Systems Student Systems _ Brady Qadberry Labor Relations 1  To Be Announced I Human Resourcer Board Of Directors c Little Rock School District Organizational Structure November 4,1993 DRAFT #2 To Be An nouncod Special Assistant to Supt Dr. Russ Mayo Assoc. Superirrtendent for Des^regatlon Jeanette Wagner Communications I Student Assignment Margaret Gremlllion Asst Supt, Elem. 16 Schools 1 Arma Hart Desegregation Facilitator Debbie Milam Volunteefs in Public School Principals I  Parent R Rather Recruitment Teachers Coordinator Parent Involvement Brad Montgomery Transportation Dr, Henry P. Williams Superintendent Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterling Ingram Associate for Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent 1 Mark MIhoilen Acting Manager for Support Services It Human Resources To Be Announced Planning, Research and Evaluation I Dave Kingseila Information Services I I Business Systems Student Systems Larry S. Robertson Asst St^ Elem. 14 Schools Or. Victor Anderson Acting Asst Supt, Sec., 13 Schools Alice Stovall Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Foreign Language Rne Arts Instructional Technology Principals I Teachers Incentive Schools Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures 'Athletics Othello Faison Alternative Learning Center _ Dennis Glasgow Science -( Physical Educational Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams  Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Exceptional Children { AnandaJ Services Doug Eaton Facinties Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Brady Gadberry Labor Relations To Be Announced Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Dr. Linda Watson Hearing Officer Catherine GiD Parent Involvement _ Jo Evelyn Ebton Pupil ^rvices Paulette Martin Adult Education Charlie Neal Procurement To Be ArwTounced Human Resources Pat Price Early Childhood Donrta Hudspeth Staff Development 1 Lucy Lyon Library Services Bill Bamhouse Security/Risk Management D Robert Glowers Phfswig. Resewdi I kWvin Schwartz Graras Miter } Board Of Directors I \u0026lt;45. Little Rock School District I La Sf\u0026gt;aW Atriium t S\u0026gt;\u0026lt;. Or. C. Rueeelt Uayo Aaeoo. Superhtandent J Suaflen Vann ConMnunteattona I Student Assignment Lhrgaret OremIKon Aset SiipL, Elam. __H?^t I SedbUlohea Aset Supt, Elam. 14 Schools 1 Debbie Mlam Volunteers in Public Sc hod Becky FUlhar Parent Heaulmei Coordnator PrincipaJs I Taachars 1 Prindpsls I Taachars Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent Organizational Structure 1994-95 February 7,1995 (Sub)ect to Revtalona) Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterthg Ingram Aaeodate tor Inatruotlon Io the Deputy Superbtendant I lnc*ntiv School* Denrrb Snider AaaL Supl., Secondary 13 Schools Gena Pakar Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Faaign Language ] Prindpais Teach ars Linda Young New Futures Athletics ] ] Di. Waler MaiMedi Akernafve Leamrig Center __ Dannis Qatgow Sdanoa Danrris Glasgow Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Sod al Studes Larry S. Robertson Hearing Officer Catherine QU Parent Irrvohramant ______J.. . IBA Legal Servtoee *Fine Arts/TAMic 1 Irrstructional Tachndogy Physical Educstiorral _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pi4^l Services Pat Price Early Childhood Marion Woods \"\" StaR DavaloprTtenl Marian Shaad HIPPY Fred Srrith He fie gw ler Support Senrkoae Card Qaen YocationaJ Education L*on A(Um - FadaraJ Programs/ Grants Dr. PaRy KoWar Excapeonal Cfildren Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Library Services Mark Mlhdtan Finarxial Services 1 Doog Eaton Fadtitias Sarvicas Jackie Anderson Food Sarvicas Charite Neat Procurerrrent Bobby Jones Secunty/Risk Manage me ra D Wary .*a*' Dishi Acing Dir. of Transportation 1 1 David Beason Inbimason Services rrp Mrwtt I trr* I Butirwtt SytUrr* Skidanl Systems ] _ Brady Gadbarry Labor Ralations ] 3 Or. Richard Hurlay Hurruan RasocrcatJBoard Of Directors Little Rock School District Organizational Structure 1994-95 \\ (Subject to Revisions) I Leon Modesti Special Assistant to Supt. Or. C. Russell Mayo Assoc. Superintendent Desegregation Jeanette Wagner Communicalions 'Student Assignment -7---------- Margarft( Gfmiliion Asst. Supt. Ekm. 18 Schools Sadie Mitchell Asst. Supt., Elem. 14 Schools TBA  Desegregation Facilitator Debbie Milam Volunteers in Public School Principals I Be\u0026lt; Parent )cl^ Rather nt Recruiimenl Coordinator 'Parent involvement TBA - Transportation Cr. Mary Jane Cheatham A^t. Dir. ot Transoortation Teachers Principals I Teachers 'Incentive Schools Responsibility of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterling Ingram Associate for Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent I TBA AssL Supt., Secondary 13 Schools Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures Athletics Dr. Waler Marshaledt Alternaltve Learning Center DEC 1994 TBA Legal Services Mark Mllhollen Manager lor Support Services Or. Robert Glowers : Planning. Research \u0026amp; Evafuation David Beason In formal ion Services I Business Systems I Office of Desegregafci .,,13 Marvin Schwart: Grants Writer Student Systems TBA Reading Gens Parker  Language Arts/ Foreign Language _ Dennis Glasgow Science TBA Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Larry S. Robertson  Hearing Oflicer Leon Adams Fine Arts\u0026lt;Muslc 'Instructional Technology Physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price ~ Earty Childhood 14 TBA Staff Development Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams  Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Excecxional Children Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services TBA Financial Services Doug Eaton Facilities Services _ Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procurement ] Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Dr. Richard Hurley Human Resources Catherine Gill ! Parent Involvement: 1 Marian Shead HIPPY Bobby Jones Security/Risk Management TBA Technology ComponentBoard Of Directors Little Rock School District Dr C Ruaiati Uaya Aieoc. Suparlnianrtant SoMan Vann C am muAka Uon a 1 I iMoUtdaAa Sf\u0026gt;acWAubtaniia Sa/t - 1 \u0026gt;1 Aar\u0026lt;Uiyw\u0026gt;ar ... tdrgarat OrtaJOta AaattMiL.Ua. Udb kUclMl AaiAtif*.. (ha Swcly Raihar Coowuiar 0(4 I Uir^an Sdiwwta I Grarwa Wna I DaUMkUam Voaxa.ar h Pu s\u0026lt;*aat 1. Piincipab IlSdtoob Pnndpati U Sdwwb rrtnc^ S Inoa/aka S^tadt Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent IBA AaiUtanl Suparinlartdani Curriculum Support Or. Vkiar Artrtaraait iaA SManOary Gn PvMr nadlng4.anguag Am Oanrtb Glaagow SdanoartAtfhamaila PtiftaptU I) Schooh Carat Obaan Vocatlanal (Nucaiion PaUaSa Manh ArtUiENuatbn O.Wal* UanUbA AkamatnaLoanttng I AMdia Marta A. Uctlaal Social Sludlaa Caihartna OH Parant Invokamanc Bfarty Labor Ralallona Dr. ftkhafrt Hurtay Human Raaotrrcaa Or. Paly KoMar Eaoanienat ChU\u0026lt; 'A Jo Evalyn EUlon Pk44 mrvfoaa SUrtiAQ Ingram Sun Oawkfwnart Pal Pftoa Eart/ ClilUltood Lucy Lyon Ta\u0026lt;Ninotogyrt4a41a Martan Shaart HIPPY Organizational Structure 1995-96 August 22, 1995 (Sub|oc| (o Roylaloru) Lany S. Aobadaen Aathtad Suparlntard^ SludanI Haartrig FnNSrrAli Uanaf It lar Sbpport SarvkM Mark Miltolan Fhnandal Sarvloaa ChartbNaal Proouramari Ooug Ealon Plant Sarrtoaa Bobby Jenaa Saouny/Rlih UanagamarN Mary Jana Chaaiham OIr.ot Tranaportatton Obactor Food Sarvtoaa Oa^M Caaaon hbrautiBA SarvtcM laon Adarvw Programa/ Or anta Lkyrta Young Haw FUutaa o w p 2 n p cr. o 3 P rt zr p \u0026gt; H H \u0026gt; n K 2 w HBoard Of Dlractora Little Rock School District 1 LawHodssla tpadd JWolantto Or. C. Ruaaafl Mayo Asaoe. Supartrtlandard Daoagragstten T tusMan Vm CemmunleaMona Dlrador til SludanI AaalgnmanI I T~- Margarat QramMan As\u0026lt;9up(.,ElaoR. HUhyIg UdtaURchal Aaa1.tu|rt.,EI\u0026gt;ni. HUteoto 1 Or hobail Ctowars Ranr\u0026gt;g Rmadi I EvatuMoi PfhdfMita Pibclpato Marvin Schwartt Oranis WrVa* I I Taachara Taacteft OateWMInm Voixrtaara li Pu^tc Schoob BacWnnlhar ParanI naorulmani Coordinalor | Dr. Henry P. Williams Suparlntandanl I nA Etlella Matthis Deputy Supwinlendenl Starting Irigrnm Assoalala for fnalruetleg M Iha Daguty BupartrHarHlard Lwry notertaen uftarlrdandaM Wudant Kaarintomoar 9chooJf1 tonntolnWw M. k*t, iMoitoi llldieeta OanaParIrar naadbg Oana Psikar Larxiuaga Arts/ Foraign Languaga f Im ArfMjlo 'Inilfudlonat Taohnotogy Pr1ndpt I TaMter t Inda Young Naw Futuraa 1 AthtaHca O WtfWVwtfWadt ARsmiIvS Lstnirig Canlsr Dannb QIaagow Sclanea Dannb Glasgow Malhematica Marta K McNaat Social Sludtaa CattMflna OP Parard Involvamatd physical Education Jo Evatyn EWon PupI Sar^rtcaa PalFfloa Fifty ChMhood Marton Woods Sfaft Oavalopman* Martan Shaad HIPPY Organizational Structure 1994-OS March 15,1005 (Bub|et to nevtolMW) StoSaMi kt topper laikM OavtlBaason Worms Ion Sanbaa Buabaaa Syalama CMilQraan \\AMilanil GduealQn lon Advm - rdnit Ptoortn Qi I PtOOrtmt/ IflM w, raiay nKwohiRte f eM4tonaf ChibrM PauMloMarth Adul Education Lucy Lyoo Library SanXoM Marit MBwIan Fbandal SacAoaa OougEfon JacMa Andarson Food Sarvleoa Chama NmI Pfoeuramanl PobbyJoras SacunryAUilt Managjmard 53.JhraChiWupn IngOfr. ol taportaHon Studard Syslama Prarfy Oadber^ Late) netatlona Or. Richard Hurta^ Human Rasouroo' SLIP SHEET TO REGULAR BOARD AGENDA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RC rL?l o**B January 27, 1994 '\"fS 219^4 Office of Dessgrogaiicn Monucring To: From: Brady Gadberry, Board of Directors or. Human Resources Through: Hen Hi ts. Superintendent of Schools Subject: Personnel Changes I recommend the approval of the following employment of new staff at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications: NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY C1owers, Robert Director PRE 1-28-94 6-06 12 E/Stip C/A $22,423.48 1,362.50 408.75 (pro-rated) Hurley, Richard Director Human Resources 2-21-94 ADMUNC 12 C/A $28,287.81 348.75 (pro-rated) Modeste, Leon Sp/Asst/Supt Admin 2-21-94 6-18 12 C/A $22,984.95 348.75 (pro-rated) T)eC..,Aiay 11^ 1fiV-Board Of Dlraclora Little Rock School District 1 Leonlkidiala Ipettd Aadttmtte Or. Henry P. Wllllame Suparintendenl I Eatalle Malthla Deputy Superintendent BtarllnQ Ingram Or. e. RueeeH Mayo Aaaoe. Supartntandard Deaegragallon T uaHet) Vatwr CommurrteaUona I 1 AtaoelHla lor tnMruetton t . _ Iha Deputy Su|\u0026gt;f1nfndar4 T IncaolM Schoda] Dlreciorol Student Aaelgrunent Margaret OreriMen AeM. Supt., Elam. KSdtyle tatfta igietMl Aaat.fupt.Elam. KScbeela Dannie tnWar AaalSupt, Saeoni llUhooto3 Dr Robert Ooeera Ramrtg Ramrdi I Eveiuelan PrbdpaM Mardn Schtearlt Oranit Wrier I 1 Prinelpeie Pflndpata Taachare DebMa Mam Vobntaertb Pubhc Schoole ] T T Taechere Teaohare Lbda young NewFutufee 1 Declw Rather Parent Reorulmeni Cmdtnalor I AIhMIca D ytiMdi Alamalve Laarring Center ZZEZ TBA LagrfSarvleaa Lry nebeftaon Aeet. tupertnlendent Wudent Hearing Otnoer OeneParhet Readbg Qene Parker Language Ada/ Foreign Language Dannie Qleegow Sclanee Dennla Olaegow MMhemaitca 11 tine ArteAluaio 'tnatructlonat Technology ThyelcW Educehon Jo Evelyn EWon Pupl9en4cee Marte A KfcNeal Social Studtea CatharbeOl Parent Involvemenl1 Pal Pftoe - Earty Chldhood Marton Woode Staff Oavalopmanl Martan Shead HIPPY Organizationai Structure 1094-05 March 15,1005 (8uMet to Revtalone) Red Maith KhnagvhrMitoert tofkee DavUBaaeon Inlormelon Sarvloae Buebeee Syeteme CereOeen 'Acelenai GdueaVon Marti MBwIen Ftnarwtal SorMoee1 Student Syeleme leer) Adeim - rejanl Ptcgrvra/ QrM O. Pally Kohler ~~ aEaaaea^a\u0026lt;kaimMMaatl CtwtM PauMte Marib Adul Educalloo Lucy Lyon Ltwary Serwtoae OougEelon Fecttlae Sarvlcas . JacMe AMeteon Pood Sarvleoe J Brady Oadberry Labor ReUlone Chama Neal Procurement Bobby Jonee Securty4Uil( a 'JbreChatfkam Acting DIf, ot TmnaportaMon Or. Richard Huday ttuman Raeouroas Board Of Directors Little Rock School District Organizational Structure 1994-95 Draft (Sub|ect to Revisions) 4- i Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I Leon Modest* Special Assistant to Supt. Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent TBA Legal Services Or. C. Russel! Mayo Assoc. Superintendent Desegregation Sterling Ingram Associate lor Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent Mark Milhollen Uartagerlor Support Services Or. Robert Clowers Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation 1 David Beason ' Inlorrnalion Services Marvin Schwartz Grants Writer Jeanette Wagner Communications 1 Student Assignment htargarei Gremilllon Asst. Supt,, Elem. 16 Schools 1 Business Systems Student Systems TBA Desegregation Faalltaior Debbie Milam Volunteers in Pudic School Principals I arent Rather ecrunmenl Coordinator Parent Involvement TBA - Transportation D. Mary Jane Cheatham Asst. Dir. ol Transoorlation Teachers Sadie Mitchell AssL Supt.. Elem. 14 Schools TBA AssL Supt., Secondary 13 Schools TBA Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Foreign Lartguage Principals 4- Teachers Incentive Schools Responsibility oC Appropriate Associate Superintendent Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures Athletics Dr. Waler Marshaleck Alternative Learning Center Dennis Glasgow Science TBA Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Larry S. Robertson Hearing OWicer Catherine Gil Parent Involvement Leon Adams Fine Arts/Muslc InslrucSlonal Techrwiogy Physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price ~ Early Childhood TBA Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams  Federal Programs/ 1 . SiaH Development Marian Shead HIPPY Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Excecxional Children Paulette Manin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services TBA Financial Services Doug Ealon Facikiies Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procurement Bobby Jones -\u0026gt; Secunty/ftisk Management _ Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Dr. Richard Hurley Human Resources TBA Technology Comoonent 1 D Robert Clowar* PWraig. Ranach I ] Board Of Directors Little Rock School District Marvin Schwarts Grarat VWrter } I leoa blodeba SpeoW is detent Ie Sipt Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I Estelle Matthis Deputy Supeiinlendenl TBA legal Servicea Dr. C. Ruaaall Uayo Aaaoo. Suparkvtandant Daaegragelion T Suellan Vanrv Com m un io at ion a I Student Assignirvent Ibrgsrel Okamlllan Asel $MPL, Etam. Sada Ulohe4 Atal Supt, EWfn. 14 Sohoole 1 Dabtsa Mtsm Voluntaart in Public Schc^ Becky Rather Raautmai Parani C^inHof Piincipalt I Taachars Prindpa/t I Taacliars Starling kigram Aaaocleta (or kiatructlon to the Deputy Suparkitandar't I lno*n1tv SchooJi Dannie Snider Aatl. Supt., Secertdery 13 Schools Gene Perkar Reading Gena Parker Language Azts/ Fvaign Language ] Tina Arts/Muaic 'instructional Tachndogy Prindpds _ Daniia Glasgow Sdanc* Physical Educational Taachars Dannis Glasgow Malltenuilics Jo Evelyn Elston Pl4\u0026gt;I Sarvicat linda Young New Futures AUiletics ] ] D W^KUaihdtck Akernsive Liaming Cn)i MndaA MUUal Sodal Studies Pat Price Early Childhood Livry S Fkbertson Hearing Officer Catherine OB Parent involvament Marion Woods Staff Oavafoprrwnt Marian Sira ad HIPPY Organizational Structure 1994-95 February 7,1995 (Subject to Revialona) Fiad Strfdi Msnegir lar Support Sarvloae David Baason Inbimstion Sarvicat Businass Sytiam* Stieda n( System* ] Card Gf^n 7ocaoo*l Education Mark MIhdIan Financial Services ] Laon Adam* - FadaraJ Piogram*/ Grants Doug Eaton Fadlilia* Sarvicat Or. PaR/ Kohlar Exceptional Children Parlelta Martin Aduh Education Lucy Lyon LiLvny Services Jadu* Anderson Food Sarvicat _ Brady Gadbarry Labor Ralationa Charlia PiocuramanI Bobby Jonas Security/Risk Management Ct Ui Usry .***' Oreihem Acting Dir, ol franspcrution ] J _ Or Richard Ihtley Human Rasoctca!]Employees Earning $40,000 or Above DONNA C BROADAWAY EMANUAL BROOKS SHARON A BROOKS KATHLEEN BROTHERTON JAMES BROWN lInda'g brown ROBERT L BROWN JR ETHER L BRUCE-UPKINS DELOIS BRYANT JUDY E BRYANT KAREN J BUCHANAN DOLORES J BUFFINGTON SCOTTIE L BURCHETT BOBBYE H BURK BETTY R BURR EVELYN J CALLAWAY MORM'AN M CALLAWAY ^ATSY R CAMPBELL CHARLENE D CARPENTER RENE T CARSON JODIE T CARTER LILLIE M CARTER________ 'HYLLIS V CARUTH FRANCES H CAWTHON SUSAN L CHAPMAN GUY H CHEATHAM MARY J CHEATHAM GEORGE E CIRKS ELLEAN D CLEVELAND UBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER (KSSTPRINCPALELEM TEACHER____________ TEACHER  *SST PRINCIPAL SEC V ROBERT L CLOWERS SUSAN E CODY-TAYLOR ELEANOR R COLEMAN STEVEN B COLUE MABEL A COLLINS______ ROBERT S CONNOLLY MARY A COOPER SUE J CORKER BILLIE J CORROTHERS THERESA J COURTNEY BERNIE L COX ELEANOR V COX ELEM PRINCIPAL  TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC COUNSELOR-ELEM ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC_____ COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL SUP SPED TEACHER_____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM DIRPLNG, RES \u0026amp; EVAL TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM \"TEACHER TEACHER SYSTEM MANAGER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_________ ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ^AMELA J CRAWFORD BILLIE J CROSS KATHRYN L CROSS SAM H DACE ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER__________ TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC $41,728.54 $48,083.14 $42,371.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $39,269.00 '$50,668.20 $40,670.00 $43,891.62 $40,670.00 $50,975.00 $40,670.00 $32,696.44 $33,664.00 $39,883.00 $43,846.74 $36,676.00 $41,791.23 J43,846.74 $45,964.94 $61,018.00 $44,169.40 $40,670.00 $46,336.40 $45,648.10 $40,670.00 $56^086.80 $38,763.00 $42,371.00 $49,370.40 $40,670.00 $12'670.00 $47,438.82 $42,116,22 $43,148,00 $43,846,74 $43,846,74 $40,67060 $42,002.40 $40,670.00 $51,752.80 $45,964.94 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,791.23 $0.00 $661.00 $2,205.60 $0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $4,326.00 $0.00 $751.00 ___ $0.00 $2,625.00 $0.00 $9,428.66 $6,732.60 $1,952.00 ____$0.00 $7,648.90 $0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 $900.00 $2,064.00 ____$0.00 $2,064.00 $2,126.00 $0.00 $2,564.00 $5,034.35 $1,731.00 $900.00 $751.00 $0.00 $6.00 $750.00 $926.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $564.00 $9,376.30 $2,566.00 $658.00 $0.00 $656.61 $0.00 $41,728,54 $48,744,14 $44,578,60 $40,670,00 $43,846,74 $41,000,00 $54,994,20 $40,670,00 $44,642,62 $40,670,00 $53,600,00 $40,670.00 $42,325,10 $40,396,80 $41,635,00 $43,846,74 $44,524,90 $41,791,23 $43,846,74 $45,964,94 $61,918,00 $46,233,40 $40,670,00 $46,400,40 $47,774,10 $40,670,00 $58,650,60 $43,797,35 $44,102,00 $50,270,40 $41,421,00 $40,670,00 $47,438,62 $42,866,22 $44,074,00 $43,646.74 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $42,566.40 $50,046.30 $54,316.80 $46,622.94 $40,670.00 $41,326.61 $41,791.23 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above EMPLOYEE____________ FRANCES M ABLES NANCY L ACRE JANET L ADAMS WAYNE E ADAMS Leon L ADAMS JR MARTHA D ALLEN MARY L ALLEY VICTOR ANDERSON III JOYCE A ARICK JANE G ARTHURS VIRGINIAS ASHLEY CLARA D AUSTIN JUNIOUS C BABBS JR MARY D BARKSDALE CAROL BARNHOUSE WILLIAM G BARNHOUSE V/ANDA F BASKINS V MARJORIE BASSA FRANCES K BATEMAN MICKEY L BATES SHARON A BAUGH EMMA J BEAVERS ... LINDA J BELL RUTH E BERRY IRA L BETTON DANNY H BLACK NANCY P BLACKSTONE BARBARA B BLAINE SAM K BLAIR RITA L BLEDSOE DONALD K BLESSING EDDIE L BOONE DEXTER L BOOTH JACKIE L BOYKIN JUI^ L BOYLE ROBERT L BRACK GAYLE B BRADRDRD MARTHA A BRANCH SAMUEL BRANCH NANCY L BRANDT DENNIS R BRANT DONALD E BRATTON ROSEMARY M BREWER MARILYN J BREWSTER TITLE librarian-JR '  SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER____________ COORD PLANT SERVICE DIR FED PROGRAMS COUNSELOR-VOC TEACHER____________ ' SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ SECONDARY PRINCIPAL asstprincipaL elem TEACHER_________ DIR SECURITY_________ TEACHER_____________ EVAL SPECIAUST TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-ELEM COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC DIR FOOD SERVICES COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER  SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER_____________ ASSTPRINCIPAL SEC __ BASE $41,728.54 $56,798.00 $40,670.00 $50,781.00 $60,2^.00 $48,083J 4 $40,670.00 $65,676.00 $48,083.14 $43,846.74 $52,837^40 $40,670.00 $62,18200 $42,371.70 $40,670.00 $57,546.00 $46,165.42 $38,400.00 $40^670.00 $40^670.00 $45,474.00 $43,646.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,676.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,024.04 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $32,118.00 $46,088.00 $50,592.00 $42981 48 $40,670.00 $57,962^00 $40,670.00 $42,002.40 $40,905.08 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $42,986.00 STIPEND $0.00 $2,300.00 $0.00 $2,013.00 $2,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,294.00 ___$661.00 $430.00 $2,064.06 _____$0.00 $2,400.00 $1,665^06 $750.00 $2,783.00 $661.00 $3,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,893.90 $750.00 $0.00 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,901.20 $1,952.00 __$900.00 $0 00 $0.00 $2,800.00 _____$0.00 $5,684.00 $0.00 $8,134.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,709.65 TOTAL $41,728.54 $59,098.00 $40,670.00 $52,794.00 $63,192.00 $46,083.14 $40,670.00 $86,970.00 $48,744.14 $44,276.74 $54,901.46 $40,670.00 $64,582.00 $44,036.76 $4 \u0026lt;420.00 $60,329.00 $46,846.42 $42,300.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,314.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,769.90 $41,420.00 $40,670.00 $47,775.04 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,019.20 $46,040.00 $51,492.00 $42^981 ?46 $40,670.00 $60,762.00 $40,670.00 $47,686.40 $40,905.08 $51,960.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $46,695.85 as of 2/22/94 IEmployees Earning $40,000 or Above MARTHA G DANIEL ROSAUE G DANIEL MABLE L DANIELS JULIE K DAVENPORT DONNA J DAVIS PRANKLIN A DAVIS KENNETH W DAVIS JWERAJDAVIS RICHARD A DAVIS SHARON D DAVIS SHIRLEY A DAVIS SUANNA J DAVIS LONNIE S DEAN JOHN L DEDMAN JR LOiS M DERRINGTON DEBORAH DESJARDIN PATRICIA D DICKINSON DOYLE R DILIAHUNTY TOMMY L DODSON MABLE L DONALDSON FAITH R DONOVAN MARTHA S DOUGLAS JOSEPHINE DUMAS vFTHELB DUNBAR DANA H DUNCAN LENORAADYER MARION O EASTER L.B. EASTER JR DOUGLAS C EATON CAROLYN EIDSON JO E ELSTON GLEN E ESKOLA RICKY L EVANS THELLO O FAISON JEROME FARMER JR VIRGINIA S FAUBEL FREDERICK L FIELDS ALFRED W FLANIGAN EUZABETR T FOTI EARLENE W FOWLER JANICE R FREEMAN DANNY A FULLER LENA A FULMER BRENDA J FUTRELL BRADY L OADBERRY JR TEACHER LIBRARIAN-JR COUNSELOR-SEC ~ ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC_______ ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ asst PRINCIPAL SEC JBRARIAN-JR___________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ VOC ADMIN TEACHER GIFTED \u0026amp; TAL SUPERVISOR  TEACHER TEACHER_______________  TEACHER EVAL SPECIAUST_________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER DIR PLANT SERVICES LIBRARIAN-ELEM DIR PUPIL SERVICES TEACHER TEACHER DIR ALT LEARNING CTR TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER SUP SPED________________ TEACHER DIR LABOR RELATIONS $40,670.00 $41,726.54 $41,791.23 $48,503.40 $57,169.20 $40,920.00 $36,876.00 $40,925.97 $43,846.74 $50,668.20 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 .$57,169.20 $45,034.00 $41,728.54 $40,670.00 $35,009.00 $55,397W $39,756 42 $47,a4242 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $40,670.00 $42,371.00 $40,670.00 $43\u0026gt;46.74 $40,670.00 $33,664.00 $57,135.00 $41,728.54 $58,587.00 $40,670.00 $45,037.98 $50,225.00 $38,763.00 $45 829.03 $38,750.80, $33,162.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,876.00 $45,648.10 $48,083.14 $63,347.00 ________$0 00 $0.00 ________$0.00 $2,064.00 ____$2,064.00 $2,825.00 $5.746.90 ________$0.00 $1,000.00 $4,263.20 _______$000 _______$0.00 $4,828.00 $451.49 ________$0.00 $751.00 ____$7,001.80' $6,100.00 ____$1,90 LOO $2,189.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 $2,206.00 ________$0W $0.00 ________$0.00 $6,732.60 $1,200.00 ________$0.00 $2,400.00 $6,897.36 ________$0.00 $1,952.00 $5,985.35 ______ $0.00 $2,064.00 $7,409.60 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 $6,499.60 $2,169.00 _____$660.57 $2,400.00 $40,670.00 $41,728.54 $41,791.23 _______$50,567.40 _______$59,233.20 _______$43,745,00 _______$42,622.90 _______$40,925.97 $44,646.74 _______$54,931.40 _______$40,670.00 _______$40,670.00 $61,997.20 _______$45,485.49 _______$41,728.54 _______$41,421.00 _______$42,010.60 _______$61,497.00 _______$41,657.42 _______$50,031 42 _______$40,670.00 _______$43,846.74 _______$40,670.00 $44,577.00 ______$40,670.00 _______$43,646.74 _______$40,670.00 _______$40,396.80 _______$56,335.00 _______$41,728.54 _______$60,987.00 _______$47,567.36 _______$45,037.98 _______$52,177.00 _______$44,746 35 _______$45,829.03 _______$40,814.80 _______$40,571.60 _______$40,670.00 _______$40~670.00 _______$40,670.00 $43,375.80 _______$47,837.10 $48,743.71 $65,747.00 as of 2/22/94. Employees Earning $40,000 or Above HELEN B GADDY MARY J GAGE CHARLES W GATES NELUEC GERARD CATHERINE J GILL HARVEY R GILLESPIE DENNIS R GLASGOW RANDALL A GLENN LAVERNE G GOLDSBY MARY R GOLSTON JEAN A GOZA HARRYETTE GRAHAM JAMES T GRANT BARBARA A GRAVES JESSICA A GRAVES CAROLYN W GRAY PEGGY A GRAY__________ CAROL B GREEN_________ CHRISTINE GREEN MARGARET B GREMILUON PAULA E GRIER__________ VIRGINIA A GROCE_______ WILLIAM J GRUMMER . CARLFGRUMMERJR MARY E GUINN__________ RANDY E GULLETT GRACIE J HALL SHIRLEY L HALL ANNE HANSEN SHIRLEY B HARPER ARMA J HART EVERETT M HAWKS STEVE A HAYES  ND A L HAYS VERDIA M HENCE BETSY D HENDERSON J C HENRY TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COORD INCENTIVE SCH TEACHER_____________ SCIENCE SUPERVISOR SPEC/LC COUNSELOR-SEC ELEM PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT TEACHER TEACHER_____________ SUP SPED COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ DIR VOCATIONAL ED TEACHER_____________ ASST SUPT - ELEM STAFF DEVELOPMENT TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER__________ TEACHER__________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DESEG FACIUTATOR ASST PRINCIPAL SEC SUPV MNT TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER RONALD F HESSELSCHWERDT TEACHER =\u0026gt;ATRICIA H HIGGINBOTHAM EDNA W HIGGINS-NORTH BEVERLYJ HINES SELMA P HOBBY SANDRA L HOFF' DOUGLAS B HOFFMAN RALPH G HOFFMAN ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER EVAL SPECIALIST LIBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $48,083.14 $40,670.00 $57,169.20 $35,270.00 $53^334.91 $40,700.00 $41,791.23 $55,002.20 $42,057.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $45,648.10 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $49,270.00 $40,670.00 $61,000.00 $43,949.40 $43,597.62 $41,391.18 $41,250.96 $56,798.00 $37,787.85 $40^670.00 $40,670.00 ,$50,225.00 $40,670.00 $61,000.00 $47,122.00 $40,319.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,876.00 $43,846.74 $41,791.23' $57,169.20 $36,876.00 $40,670.00 $45,474.00 $41,728.54 $34,467.00 $60,292.00 $0.00 $0.00 $661.00 $0.00 $900.00 $6,720.00 $2,691.00 $2^064.00 $0.00 $2,064.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $6,798.34 $2 J 89.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $2,189.00 $661.00 $661.00 $0.00 $2,625.00 $9,458.44 $0.00 $0.00 $3,452.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $855.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,126.20 $0.00 $430.00 $2,064.00 $7,375.20 $0.00 $3,706.00 $0.00 $6,893.40 $2,800.00 $40,670.00 $40,670,00 $48,744.14 $40,670.00 $58,069.20 $41,990 00 $56,025.91 $42,764.00 $41,791.23 $57,066.20 $45,057.00 $43,846.74 $47,468.34 $47,837.10 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $51,670.00 $40,670.00 $62,200.00 $46,138.40 $44,258.62 $42,052.18 $41,250.96 $59,423.00 $47,246.29 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $53,677.00 $40,670.00 $62,200.00 $49,522.00 $41,174.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $45,002.20 $43,846.74 $42,221.23 $59,233.20 $44,251.20 $40,670.00 $49,180.00 $41,728.54 $41,360.40 $63,092.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above ELEANOR L HOLEMAN RUDOLPH HOWARD MARION A HOWEY MARY J HUDDLESTON ELOUISE J HUDSON SHELIA A HUDSON DONITA HUDSPETH MAC W HUFFMAN ANN J HURD STERLING INGRAM CHRiSTAL L ISOM MARGARET V ISUM DELORES S IVEY_______ EDWIN S JACKSON RUBY L JACKSON BRENDA F JAMES CHARLOTTE A JAMES EMOGENEBJAMES RITA A JAMES carol A JENNINGS ARTHURL JOHNSON CHARLIE JOHNSON GERALDINE A JOHNSON MAYREAN S JOHNSON WONDRUE M JOHNSON ANNA M JOINER-TATUM DORIS J JONES JACK A JONES MARY R JONES NANCY C JONES UNDA A KAMARA_______ CLEMENTINE KELLEY JOHN W KELLEY HELEN B KELLY A DOUGLAS KENDALL LINDA L KINDY JERI B KING TERRY G KIRKPATRICK ATRICIA A KOHLER TEACHER_____________  SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER \"LIBRARIAN-JR_________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DIR STAFF DEV________ ELEM PRINCIPAL - READING______________  ASSOC TO DPTY SUPT COUNSELOR-SEC LIBRARIAN-ELEM COUNSELOR-SEC \"ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC  TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER NAVY_________________ TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER______________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER______________ EPA COORD ASST biR ADULT ED TEACHER TEACHER $42,116.22 $64,512.00 $48,083.14 $41,728.54 $40,303.00 $36,073.00 $55,093.00 $57,169.20 *____$40,670.00 $65,000.00 $41,105.52 $41,728.54 ____$43,846.74 $6 \u0026lt;456.00 $40,670.00 $37,815.00 $40,670.00 $40*670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $46,078.00 $32,118.00 KARIN S KVATERNIK MARIAN G LACEY JESSE J LACEY JR CHARLES H LANCE LAURA P LANDERS BERNICE W LANEY DIR SPECIAL ED TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-SEC COUNSELOR-ELEM $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $45474?00 $40,383.63 $41,250.96 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $33,664.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $55,3K.6O $40,553 31 $46,18542 $47,438.82 $51,599.00 $40,670.00 $61,456.00 $46,576.00 $43,846.74 $48,083.14 $40,670.00 $0.00 $1,700.00 $1,611.00 $0.00 $1,640.00 $7,965.60 $900.00 $564.00 $0.00 $725.00 $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,625\n00 $0.00 $2,432.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,226.20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $0.00 ___$0.00 $8,134.00 $751.00 $6,732.80 $0.00 $8,713.30 $0.00 $1,636.46 $0.00 $661.00 $2,650.01 $3,900.00 $0.00 $2,800.00 $3,452.00 $1,791.00 $750.00 $0.00 $42,116.22 $66,212.00 $49,694.14 $41,728.54 $42,143.00 $44,03860 $55,993.00 $57,733.20 $40,670.00 $65,725.00 $41,855.52 $41,726.54 $43,846.74 $65,061.00 $40,670.00 $40,247.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $46,078.00 $41,346.20 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $47,205.00 $40,383.63 $41,250.96 $46,804.00 $41,421.00 $40,396.80 $40,670.00 $49,363.30 $40,670.00 $57,002 06 $40,553.31 $46,646.42 $50,068.83 $55,499.00 $40,670.00 $64,256.00 $52,028 00 $45,637.74 $48,833.14 $40,67000 as of 2/22/94 1Employees Earning $40,000 or Above NANCY G LESLIE WILHELMINA E LEWELLEN JANICE LEWIS LEE E LEWIS____________ MARY R LOFTON Ladell looper TONALD N LOOPER DOROTHY J LOVELACE JULIA F LOYALL LUCY M LYON SUE MADDISON ANNE P MANGAN RICHARD L MAPLE JR WALTER A MARSHALECK BARBARA A MARTIN PAULETTE H MARTIN CASSANDRA N MASON JAMES D MATHEWS ESTELLE W MATTHIS JAMES L MATTHIS HAZEL L MAY____________ BONNIE B MAYBERRY C RUSSELL MAYO SHERRIE S MAYS HARRIETTE B MAZZANTI EDWINA Y MCCLURKAN ROBERT I MCDONALD THOMAS A MCDONALD SANDRA L MCFADDEN JUDY A MCGRATH LONA G MCKINNON JOANNE B MCLENDON \"REDIE D MCLENNAN PATRICIA A MCMURRAY MARIE A MCNEAL PATRICIA A MCNEIL BARBARA W MEANS MARYAMENKING JUDITH L MILAM MARK D MILHOLLEN EMMAUNE C MILLER SUSAN P MILLER NANCY B MITCHELL SADIE M MITCHELL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL__________ STAFF DEVELOPMENT TEACHER TEACHER________________ COORD LIB/INST TECH TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL SECONDARY PRINCIPAL___ SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER DIR ADULT ED ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DEPUTY SUPT____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC COUNSELOR-SEC________ TEACHER________________ ASST SUPT - DESEG TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER______________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASSTPRINCIPAL SEC SOC STUDIES SUPERVISOR ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER________________ MGR SUPPORT SVCS TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER ELLA M MOBLEY ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER $43,931.31 $40,670.00 ___$40,670.00 $40,670 00 $40,670.00 $48,503.40 $46,283.40 $41,791.23 ____$40,670.00 $43,895.32 $40,670.00 $49,585.80 ____$65,676.00 $45,151.00 $40,670.00 $46,754.51 $38,849.00 $43,846.74 $85,000.00 $48,576.00 $42,981.48 $40,383.63 $68,000.00 $45,236.56 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 ____$40,670.00 $39,064.00 $32,116.00 $39,193.38 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,597.62 $41,337.00 $45,648.10 $45,251.80 $44,169.40 $52,837.40 $40,670.00 $68000.00 $40,670.00 $36,676.00 $40,670.00 $45,251.60 $40,670.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,064.00 $2,688.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,189.00 $751.00 $4,326.00 $2,300.00 $2,600.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,640.00 $950.00 $1,200.00 $2,673.00 $0.00 $0.00 $895.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,576.00 $9,003.60 $950.00  $0.00 ____$0.00 $661.00 $1,840.00 $669.00 $2,063.20 $2,380.00 $2,566.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0^00 $8,126.20 $0.00 $564.00 $0.00 $44,592.31 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $50,567.40 $50,971.40 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $46,084,32 $41,421.00 $53,911.60 $67,976.00 $47,951.00 $40,670.00 $50,254.51 $40,669.00 $44,796.74 $66,200.00 $51,249.00 $42,981.48 $40,383.63 $68,895.00 $45,897.56 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,640.00 $41,121.60 $40,143.38 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $44,258.62 $43,177.00 $46,337.10 $47,315.00 $46,549.40 $55,403.40 $40,670.00 $69,200.00 $40,670.00 $45,002.20 $40,670.00 $45,615.80 $40,670.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above FLORA D MOLDEN__________ BRADFORD G MONTGOMERY FRANCILE MOORE SCOTT MORGAN WILUEC MORRIS JIMMY J MOSBY JOANNA M MOSLEY BETTY C MUENCH MARY L MURPHREE DIANA K NAGEL LOU E NAUDEN CHARLES A NEAL JOE A NIVEN BOBBIE J NORMAN LEOLA P NORMAN MICHAEL NORTON 4RTHUR C OLDS MICHAEL E OUVER JUDYKORINTAS MARTHA V PACE WILLIE PAIGE JR PATT J PARKER____________ GENE PARKER JR DAVID H PATTERSON ROSALIE T PATTON ANNITA C PAUL MARY J PEDIGO \u0026lt;ATHY PENN-NORMAN YORIKO U PERRITT MITCHELL PERRY________ MICHAEL W PETERSON EMMA J PEYTON DOROTHY A PHILUPS =^ATRICIA A PHILLIPS TABITHA L PHILLIPS FLORENE J PHIPPS SHIRLEY K PICKLE CELESTNE PIGGEE KRISTANNA D PITTENGER GAIl G PITTS JNDA M PORTER JAMES E POWELL TIS M PRESLAR MARY J PREWIT PATRICIA A PRICE TEACHER_____________ DIR TRANSPORTATON teacher ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL \u0026gt;SST PRINCIPAL SEC JBRARIAN-SEC TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER DIR PROCUREMENT SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER ____ TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ENGLISH SUPERVISOR \u0026gt;SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER EVAL SPECIALIST TEACHER TEACHER_____________ \u0026gt;SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ Asst PRINCIPAL elem TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ IKSST PRINCIPAL SEC DOUNSELOR-SEC Asst PRINCIPAL sec ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER COORD EARLY CHILD $40,670.00 $49,501.00 $40,670.00 $40,093.00 $42,002.40 $42,371.00 $41,726.54 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $57,546.00 $57,524.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $4O\n67O.OO $33,443.00 $49,585.80 $40,670.00 $40,670W $43,846.74 $43,846.74 $42,664.80 $42,371.00 $34,467.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,303.00 $40,670.00 $44,341.44 $41,951.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $37,200.00 $40,670.00 $35,270.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,234.00 $42,637.32 $50,225.00 $57,169.20 $40,670.00 $60,292.00 $0.00 $900.00 $0.00 $563.20 $564.00 $340.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $2,179.00 $2,400.00 ____WW $751.00 $0.00 $6,688.60 $2,064.00 $0.00 $0.00 $950.00 $751.00 $2,189.00 $340.00 $6,693.40 $0.00 $0.00 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $452.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,052.00 $500.00 $7,054.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,342.00 $750.00 $5,665.27 $2,064.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $40,670.00 $50,401.00 $40,670 00 $40,656.20 $42,566.40 $42,711.00 $41,728.54 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $59,725.00 $59,924.00 $40,670.00 $41,421.00 $40,670.00 $40,131.60 $51,649.80 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $44,796.74 $44,597.74 $45,053.80 $42,711.00 $41,360.40 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,054.00 $40,670.00 $44,341.44 $42,403.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,252.00 $41,170.00 $42,324.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,576.00 $43,387.32 $56,090 27 $59,233.20 $40,670.00 $62,692.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above H. D, PRUETT BEVERLY A RALEY CATHERINE M RAND SUSAN D RAYMOND ELUS E REGISTER________ LUCYLRHODES DPAL E RICE LEAH A RILEY CHARLES J RIPLEY JR LAYMOR B ROBERTS JR AUDRON S ROBERTSON LARRY S ROBERTSON CONSTANCE F ROBINSON JOHN H ROBINSON */ERA L ROBINSON SHIRLEY A ROLAX SHYREL D ROSE__________ PAULA D RYNDERS_______ DORIS L SARVER DOROTHY D SCHEIBNER BRENDA LYNN SCRIMAGER DARRELL L SEWARD GENEVA S SHELLS CHERYL A SIMMONS\" J C SKIPPER_____________ CHARITY O SMITH GARY S SMITH TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER izAULJ SMITH PAULA M SMITH PHYLLIS A SMITH WILLIAM O SMITH ^/ERNON SMITH JR EVELYN H SOO CHARLES S SPRINGER DANNY W STEELE MARY L STEELMAN SARA J STEPHENS ALICE S STOVALL STANTON L STRAUSS ROYCE C STROUD BRENDA J STUCKEY SAM J STU EART CLAYTON L TAYLOR FRANCES D TAYLOR CAROLYN F TEETER COUNSELOR-VOC TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_________ TEACHER UBRARIAN-SEC_______ ASST SUPT - ELEM TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER SUP SPED COORD GIFTED \u0026amp; TAL UBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER DIR COMM SCHOOL TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SPEC CBI EVAL SPECIAUST TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER yOC COORD__________ TEACHER SP COORD TEACHER DIR ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER____________ TEACHER TEACHER____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $36,876 00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $36,876,00 $43,846,74 $41,728,54 $61,000,00 $43,846,74 $45,054,00 $40,303,00 $40,670,00 $40,155,61 $44,548,71 $41,728,54 $40,670,00 ____$40,255,20 $36,354,00 $40,670,00 $50,975,00 ____$31,165,92 $49,810,00 $39,958,52 $49,387,81 $43,846,74 $42,116,22 $40,670,00 $50,225,00 $45,964,94 $47,189,03 ____$45,829,03 ____$44,958.41\" $40,670,00 $53,928,00 $47\n418,80 $43,8^,74 $43,597,62 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $40,670,00 $48,503,40 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $6,749,90 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $3,616,00 $0,00 $0,00 $1,200,00 $0,00 $452,00 $1,731,00 $0,00 $2,189,00 $2,189,00 _____$0 00 $0,00 $1,740,00 $5,706,10 $0,00 $3,625,00 $8,933,82 $2,300,00 $2,100,00 $3,751,00 $0,00 $751,00 $0,00 $1,951,50 $656,00 $340,00 $1,412,00 $2,126,00 $0,00 $2,900,00 $4\n32660 $12,568,58 $1,091,00 $0,00 $10,407,88 $0,00 $2,064,01 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $43,625,90 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,692,00 $43,846,74 $41,728,54 $62,200,00 $43,646,74 $45,506,00 $42,034,00 $40,670,00 $42,344,61 $46,737,71 $41,728,54 $40,670,00 $41,995,20 $42,060,10 $40,670,00 $54,600,00 $40,099,74 $52,110,00 $42,056,52 $53,138,81 $43,846,74 $42,867,22 $40,670,00 $52,176,50 $46,622,94 $47,529,03 $47,241,03 $47,084,41 $40,670,00 $56,628,00 $51,744,60 $56,415,32 $44,668,62 $40,670,00 $50,791,51 $40,670,00 $50,567,41 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above DHARLOTTE A TEETER JUDY S TEETER HELEN J THOMAS MICHAEL C THOMAS SHI RLEY A THOMAS NANCY K THOMPSON =EGGYS\"THOMPSON BEVERLY \"BTH^SHER______ BARBARA \"N THRONEBERRY LINDA E TODD SAMMIE N TOLLETTE JUDITH TROWELL MARILYN E TURNER__________ JOYCE M UNDERWOOD ANDREW P VANECKO GLORIA O VENABLE BOY L WADE JEANETTE WAGNER ARDELIA A, WALKER CHERRIE D'WALKER ELLA M WALKER_____________ MILDRED J WALKER COLLEEN S WALLS LIONEL WARD JAMES L WASHINGTON BILLY N WATSON Cl^UDlA G WATSON GLADYSTINE WATSON Linda WATSON MARYLEE R WATSON CLELL WATTS BECKY S WEBB CECIL H WEBB JR VERA WELLER DAISY M WHEELER GLORIA A WHITE SUZANNE D WHITE NONA M WHITTAKER HENRY P WILLIAMS JOYCE YWILUAMS ROGER N WILUAMS EULAMWILUS GLORIA P WILSON LEVANNA M WILSON TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ^SST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ 'TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER\"__________' TEACHER LIBRARIAN-JR MATH SUPERVISOR \"TEACHER \"TEACHER \"TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ DIR COMMUNICATIONS TEACHER ^SST PRINCIPAL SEC \"TEACHER_____________ TEACHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ELEM PRINCIPAL IKSST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER \"TEACHER TEACHER HEARING OFFICER TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ SUPERINTENDENT TEACHER \u0026gt;SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER JANE A WINSTON ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER |$40,670.00 |$40,670.00 $45,474.00 $36,763.00 ___$40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670 66 $40,670.00 $41,726.54 $53,334.91 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $38,763.00 $40,682.00 $40,670.00 $38,849.00 $43,846.74 $38,763.00 $47,196.80 $52,637.40 $39,883.00 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $43,646.74 $61,000.80 $48,083.14 $61,456.00 $40,670.00 $46,083.14 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 ' $115,000.00 $40,670.00 $48,576.00 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $47,418.80 $40,670 00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $2,90300 $0.00 $500.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $401.66 $0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $8,277.35 $666.00 ____$0.00 $1,952.00 $1,251.00 $6,503.60 $689.00 $2,064.00 $6,135.50 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $900.00 $3,312.00 $2,300.00 $0.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 ____SOW $0.00 $0.W $0.00 $0.00 $1,840.00 $750.00 $0.00 $2^566.00 $0.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,205.00 $41,666.00 $40,670.00 $44,346.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,728.54 $53,736,57 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $47,040.35 $41,370.00 $40,670.00 $40,801.00 $45,097.74 $47,266.60 $47,687.60 $54,901.40 $46,018.50 $41,421.00 $43,846.74 $43,6^.74 $61,900.80 $51,395.14 $63,756.00 $40,670.00 $46,744.14 $40^670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $115,000.00 $40,670.00 $50,416.00 $42,541.23 $40,670.00 $49,984.80 $40,670.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above CRYSTAL A WOOD MARION E WOODS MAUD E WOODS WILLIE L WOODS JERRY P WORM TEACHER____________ STAFF DEVELOPMENT ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ELEM PRINCIPAL ROBERT B WRIGHT LINDA I YOUNG GWENDOLYN S ZEIGLER JUDY R ZINK COUNSELOR-SEC NEW FUTURES ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER $40,670.00 $43,949.40 $50,225.00 $48,576.00 $53,919.80 $43,846.74 $48,750.03 $50,668.20 $41,791.23 $0.00 $2,070.81 $452.00 $1,840.00 $2,064.00 $0.00 $2,400.01 $2,064.00 $0.00 $40,670.00 $46,020.21 $50,677.00 $50,416.00 $55,983.80 $43,646.74 $51,150.04 $52,732.20 $41,791.23 as of 2/22/94To: Ann From: Polly MEMO Subject: Comparing LRSD Organizational Charts Date: February 27, 1994 In comparing the April 1993 organization chart (Mac Bernd) to the February 1995 chart (Hank Williams), I have two summaries for your review. Attachment A (^) and Attachment B (5). Because I have gone as far as I can with inhouse resources, I stopped here for you to review the data and decide whether to proceed to the next step, which would be to call LRSD and request salary information. A and B are two different approaches to comparing the organizational charts:  A is a simple fact-to-fact comparison\nwhereas B breaks down and analyzes the changes in the organizational charts.  A needs very little explanation\nwhereas, B has several areas that need additional explanation.  A does not have a bottom line because of the limited inhouse resources\nB does have a bottom line.  Both have merits\nhowever, if LRSD chose to do so, B is one way they could argue that little change has occurred in the organizational charts. Attachment A: The first column lists all positions from both organizational charts. The next four columns tell the name of the person holding the position and their salary. Shading notes if a position was not listed on that particular organizational chart. The rest of the chart is self explanatory. Most of the salary information used in this chart is 2/22/94 information, which should not have changed much because LRSD issued only step increases for 1994-95. Attachment B: This summary notes the changes between the two organizational charts, the net loss or gain of employees, and the net loss or gain of those employees salaries. Some of the changes are really clear as to whether they are an addition or deletion. However, some are not easily categorized. One change you need to note is on the first page about 2/3 down from the top, regarding Reading, Language Arts, etc. The net loss of salaries shows the salary of Alice Stovall and Dianne Wood when they retired, not in April 1993\nprobably not a lot of difference, but some. Also, if Hank plans to replace Alice and Diane, then no loss would show\nbut Hanks chart does not list TBA for those positions. The last row on the first page, regarding Mark Milhollen, shows a change with no net loss or gain. Although Mark received a large salary increase between April 1993 and February 1995, the organizational charts only reflect a change in title.Comparing LRSD Organizational Charts February 27, 1995 Page 2 On the second page, the second row down, regarding Catherine Gill, shows a net loss of one employee with a salary of $22,965. As far as the organizational chart, this change is a Move with no net loss or gain. However, Catherine Gill actually replaced Annie Abrams as the PAC Coordinator. Although Annie was not on Macs chart, LRSD lost an employee because of this change. The next row down shows a net loss of one employee, Arma Hart, with a salary of $54,232. Although Arma received a large salary increase a short time after April 1993, the chart reflects Armas salary in April 1993. Summary/Recommendation: If A was complete so that a bottom line was drawn, it would show a greater difference between organizational charts than B shows, mainly, however, because of salary increasesnot because of additional administrators. If the Legal Services position is filled and Reading and Mathematics supervisors are hired, then Hanks chart would be top heavy. At this time though, neither A nor B shows that Hank has more administrators than Bernd had in April 1993. I can continue on and request the additional salary information from LRSD, getting them involved, or we can file this information for later reference in case Hank wants to hire a Legal Services person or additional administrators. I recommend that we file the information for later reference, because at this time I do not see a significant development from continuing this approach. Just let me know the direction you wish to take.Attachment A COMPARISON BETWEEN APRIL 1993 AND FEBRUARY 1995 ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS Positions April 1993 February 1995 Name Salary Name Salary Superintendent Deputy Superintendent Communications Human Resources Labor Relations Special Assistant to Supt Legal Services Information Services Business Systems Student Systems Assoc Supt Org \u0026amp; Learn Equity Associate Supt Desegregation Assoc Supt Sch Oper \u0026amp; Climate Assoc Supt Curr \u0026amp; Learn Imp Associate to Deputy Supt Manager Res \u0026amp; Sch Support Effective Schools Student Assignment Monitoring \u0026amp; Implem/Deseg Plan Planning \u0026amp; Evaluation Grants Writer VIPS CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator Hearing Officer Incentive Schools Assistant Supt-Elem Assistant Supt-Elem Assistant Supt-Sec Principals Teachers Mac Bernd 110,000. Hank Williams 115,000. WA N/A Estelle Matthis 86,200. Jeanette Wagner Brady Gadberry N/A N/A Dave Kingsella N/A Marie Parker N/A Janet Benard Estelle Matthis N/A Gary Jones Responsibility only Responsibility only Arma Hart Sterling Ingram N/A Debbie Milan Martha Rodgers Julie Weidower Catherine Gill Rudolph Howard Responsibility oniyi Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Sam Stuart Responsibility onlyi ResfXMieibitity only 40,080. 62,764. N/A N/A 57,365. N/A  65,000. N/A 68,900. 65,000. N/A 65,000 N/A N/A. 54,232. 60,292. N/A N/A 55,120. 50,128 N/A N/A Suellen Vann Richard Hurley Brady Gadberry Leon Modeste TBA David Beason Responsibiirty only Responsibiirty only N/A Russ Mayo N/A N/A Sterling Ingram Fred Smith N/A ResponsbiMy only N/A Robert Glowers Marvin Schwartz Debbie Milan ' Not charts Becky Rather N/A Larry Robertson ResponsfeiWy only Margaret Gremillion Sadie Mitchell Dennis Snider Responsibility only iResponsbitrtyonlyi 40,682. 73,000. 65,747. 53,000. 57,135. N/A N/A 68,895. N/A N/A 65,725. 68,000 ' N/Ai .N/Ai N/A , 53,000. 49,501. N/A '- N/A 62,200. \" N/A 62,200. N/A   N/AI ' New Futures Linda Young Linda Young 51,150. Athletics i Responsibility only i Responsibility only Alternative Learning Othello Faison Walter Marshaleck 47,951. Reading Alice Stovall 53,928.* Gene Parker 45,054. Language Arts Gene Parker Gene Parker Foreign Language Gene Parker Science Dennis Glasgow Dennis Glasgow 56,026. Math Dianne Wood 50,225.* Dennis Glasgow Social Studies Marie McNeal Marie McNeal 46,337. Fine Arts Res^slbilfty only i N/A Responsibility only Ist/A Music NQitdia,rt6d N/A Instructional Technology Responsibility onlyi N/A ^Responsibility only! I^A Physical Education Responaibtiity only\nN/A ^Responsibility only! N/A Drug \u0026amp; Health Education Jo Evelyn Elston N/A W Pupil Services N/A N/A Jo Evelyn Elston 60,987. Early Childhood Pat Price Pat Price 62,692. Staff Development Marvin Zimmerman Marion Woods 46,020. HIPPY Not charted N/A Marian Shead Vocational Carol Green Carol Green 51,670. Federal Prog ram s/G rants Leon Adams Leon Adams 63,192. Exceptional Children Patty Kohler Patty Kohler 55,499. Adult Education Paulette Martin Paulette Martin 50,255. Library Services Lucy Lyon Lucy Lyon 46,084. Parent Involvement Not charted N/A Catherine Gill 58,069. Controller Mark Milhollen N/A N/A Financial Services N/A N/A Mark Milhollen 69,200. Facilities Services Doug Eaton Doug Eaton 58,335. Food Services Jackie Boykin 55,216. Jackie Anderson 51,492. Procurement Charlie Neal 56,880. Charlie Neal 59,725. Security/Risk Management Bill Barnhouse Bobby Jones Transportation Brad Montgomery Mary Jane Cheatham 58,651. Total * Salary at time of retirement (1993-94)Attachment B Comparison between April 1993 and February 1995 Organizational Charts Below is the breakdown describing how the April 1993 organizational chart differs from the February 1995. From the April 1993 organization chart. Hank Williams: Action Net Loss or Gain of Employees Net Loss or Gain of Base Salary Added: Special Assistant to Superintendent, Leon Modeste Legal Services, TBA Separated: Labor Relations/Human Resources, Brady Gadberry into Labor Relations, Brady Gadberry Human Resources, Dr. Richard Hurley Combined: Assoc Supt School Operations \u0026amp; Climate, Janet Bernard Assoc Supt Curriculum \u0026amp; Learning Imp, Estelle Matthis into Deputy Superintendent, Estelle Matthis then added Associate to Deputy Superintendent, Sterling Ingram Combined: Language Arts, Gene Parker Foreign Language, Gene Parker into Language Arts/Foreign Language, Gene Parker Combined: Reading, Language Arts, Foreign Language from two supervisors to one supervisor Science and Mathematics from two supervisors to one supervisor Changed: Drug \u0026amp; Health Education, Jo Evelyn Elston to Pupil Services, Jo Evelyn Elston Changed: Controller, Mark Milhollen to Financial Services, Mark Milhollen +2 +1 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 +53,000 +??? +73,000 +18,000 0 -53,928 -50,225 0 0Moved: Information Services, Dave Kingseila, from under Manager Resources \u0026amp; School Support 0 0 to answering directly to Superintendent then added under Information Services, David Beason Business Systems Student Systems Removed: Parent Coordinator, Catherine Gill -1 -22,965 Added: Parent Involvement, Catherine Gill (new to chart-replaced the PAC Coordinators position) Removed: Effective Schools, program only Monitoring \u0026amp; Implementation/Deseg Plan, Arma Hart -1 -54,232 CARE (Removed from chart only-position still exists.) Added: HIPPY, Marian Shead (new to chart only-existed previously) 0 0 Moved: Communications, Jeanette Wagner, from answering directly to Supt 0 0 to under Assoc Supt Deseg (Suellen Vann) Added Grants Writer, Man/in Schwartz +1 +49,501 Moved: Hearing Officer, Rudolph Howard, from under Assoc Supt 0 0 to under Assoc to Deputy Supt (Larry Robertson) Total 0 +12,154 + Legal ServicesPersonnel Changes Page 5 April 28, 1994 Name Position School Effective Date Salary Class Annual Salary Bynum, Tyrone Furrer, Glenda Greene, Gregory Harris, Kyan Hunkins, Jeffery Jackson, Kenneth Oliver, Stephanie Roberts, Cindy L. Roston, Casandra Schwartz, Marvin New Non-Certified Employees Bus Driver Transportation Food Service Carver Custodian Cloverdale JH Bus Driver Transportation Bus Driver Transportation Custodian Central Bus Driver Transportation Food Service Pulaski Hghts JH Bus Driver Transportation Grant Writer Administration 2/25/94 3/10/94 3/14/94 2/16/94 3/03/94 4/04/94 2/28/94 3/15/94 2/19/94 05/23/94 3-10 BUSDRV $ 37.14 per day 1-01 FSHRLY 1-02 CUSTDL 3-10 BUSDRV 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 CUSTDL 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 FSHRLY 3-10 BUSDRV 6-09 ADMNC $ 6.41 per hour $ 5.77 per hour $ 37.14 per day $ 37.14 per day $ 5.57 per hour $ 37.14 per day $ 6.41 per hour $ 37.14 per day $49,501.00 $ 5,568.75 (PR)I Personnel Changes Page 8 December 15, 1994 h NAME POSITION SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY I I I I i Hunter, Sheila Johnson, Gloria McKey, Wendell McTyer, Devonda Mitchell, Eric Nutt, Dorothy Phillips, Anthony Ray, Dwight Reece, Curtis Rodgers, Pakita Smith, Freddie Superv Aide DODD Custodian MCCLELLAN Custodian MANN Food Service MABELVALE JR Bus Driver TRANS Custodian PUL HGTS JR Bus Driver TRANS Custodian ROCKEFELLER Bus Driver TRANS Custodian HALL Manager-Finan RESOURCES \u0026amp; 11-07-94 10-31-94 10-31-94 11-01-94 10-18-94 10-31-94 11-03-94 10-31-94 10-10-94 10-20-94 12-15-94 SUPPORT SERVICES 1-01 SVA5 1-01 CUS925 1-01 CUS925 1-01 FSH5 3-01 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-01 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 11-01 AUNC12 CA 4.70 per hr 5.57 per hr 5.57 per hr 6.41 per hr 42.54 per day 5.57 per hr 42.54 per day 5.57 per hr 37.14 per day 5.57 per hr 68000.00 annual 36992.00 prorated . 1200.00 annual 652.80 proratedRECEIVE?) SEP 2 9 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegrogaitwi Date: September 27, 1995 To: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: i 11 i^^m^^upehntei^ Superintendent Re: LRSD Organizational Chart The position that has been questioned, which appears on the new organizational chart, is one that was originally proposed for Estelle Matthis. This position was suggested prior to her decision to take long-term sick leave and ultimately retire once her accumulated sick leave and vacation time have been exhausted. As a reminder, I indicated in court that once I had the opportunity to evaluate the Districts needs, I would make some recommendations to the Board as to how I would reorganize the area of curriculum and instruction and what positions might be required. I have now had the opportunity to consider the needs of the District in this area and I believe that a position is needed. Once a business case has been developed it will be forwarded to you as a matter of course to be shared with appropriate parties and for the Court records. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call.(3//^ CyMrJ) RECEiV^l5 SEP 2 9 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Offics of DesegregatiOfi Date: September 27, 1995 To: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: I i^in^^uperintei^i Superintendent Re: LRSD Organizational Chart The position that has been questioned, which appears on the new organizational chart, is one that was originally proposed for Estelle Matthis. This position was suggested prior to her decision to take long-term sick leave and ultimately retire once her accumulated sick leave and vacation time have been exhausted. As a reminder, I indicated in court that once I had the opportunity to evaluate the Districts needs, I would make some recommendations to the Board as to how I would reorganize the area of curriculum and instruction and what positions might be required. I have now had the opportunity to consider the needs of the District in this area and I believe that a position is needed. Once a business case has been developed it will be forwarded to you as a matter of course to be shared with appropriate parties and for the Court records. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call...T LI M - 0 5 - 9 e. WED ? : O 1 P . O 1 Southujcst Office Supplies i Senice * Convenieccs * SeiecdOQ 4723 Base Lins Road  Linis Rock, AR 72209 (501)562-6621 FAX (501)562-2466 FAX COVER SHEET DATE\nTIME: TO: # CALLED\nFROM: : 4 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: ~r IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL (501)562-6621 REMARKS: rJ LI N - 0 kJ E n 05 0 1 F' , 0 2 Witnessing the submission of the reorganization plan to the School .Board last Thursday night was one of the most iiTesponsibie actions of the superintendent that has been done lately. Not surprisingly, he tried to persuade the Board to approve the plan without a great deal of discussion or explanation Tills plan is a major play by two, maybe tluee players. The players include Dr. Williams, Brady Gadberry, and perhaps Linda Young. None of these people actually know what the staff of the curriculum departments have done or attempted to do in our schools. Dr. Williams seldom goes to the IRC to discuss issues dealing with the curriculum, or has .Brady Gadbeny made it Iris objective to find out what goes on in the schools. Is he even qualified? Does being principal of a junior Irigh make him an expert in curriculum? Does being a Labor Relations Director make him an expert? I don't think so. Yet, he has placed himself as Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum. 1 wonder what he knows about the National or State Frameworks for Math, Science, Social Studies, English, or Reading. What does he know about integrating the curriculum and making it applicable for our students today? Since his illness has often sidelined him for long periods of time, I wonder what he knows about these topics or what goes on in our schools. Linda Young has been made a Director. What exactly does her duties as a Director of New Futures include? The Special Assistant to the Superintendent will be placed under her jurisdiction to do what duties? Tliis seems to be a lofty title for someone who was liired as a liaison for a special giant program only nine years ago. Does planning a reception tor the superintendent and solicting funds for the party deserve being named a director? Serving on committees and advising the superintendent seems to go a long way. Does working in four junior high schools and organizing the teaming approach for these junior high schools deserve the title of a Director? Someone seems to think so. When does dedication to schools and qualification for the job count? How has she worked with the curriculum people in reorganinzing the schools? Communication with most of the supervisors has been very limited. Gene Parker has seemed to be the only supervisor who has worked with her. Where does he fit into the structure? Word has it that he may resign since he was not placed in a Itigh position. Sour grapes??? He is allowed to \"do Ins work at home\" since the stress of the District bothers him. Ooooo, nice perks for someone who seems so tempermental at times. How cooperative a player is he? Whose team is he playing for? He often doesnt show for meetings at the time set by the group and wants the time changed for his convenience. disjointidness. This seemed to an area of It seems as if responsibilities for the curriculum, the central theme of our schools, is getting left out of the whole plan. No one from the upper level of the administration has made it their task to find out what is going on in the trenches. Margaret GremiUion, Sadie Mitchell, and Vic Anderson are in the schools almost everyday. Ask them how much the curriculum staff works in the schools\nask the principals who haved asked for assistance. A comment which was included in the nanative of the business case states that 'the efforts of the present structure of the curriculum is disjointed.\" I wonder how any one would know that as a fact. How much communication has been done with all the,instructional supervisors or the specialists who are in the schools on a daily basis? What discussion has. TIJ N - 0 5 WED P . 0 3 taken place with the principals who requested assistance or the teachers who have been helped? Staff development has been orchestrated by the various curriculum departments. This inservice has been the best in the state. No other school district in this state has specialists who can deliver inservice like the teachers in our district are receiving. Other districts must rely on coop stalT or other paid consultants. Our needs as the largest and most integrated District in the state are special. Did any of the upper level stafl' see, hear, or participate in this training? No, I don't tliink so. Tliis staff development was done with a dedicated staff that planned and conducted the inservice with the liighest level of professionalism. Teachers were provided with instruction, supplies, and guidance. Where else in this State could this much preparation be done and instruction be delivered? Planning was done jointly and cooperatively. All areas of the curriculum were Involved. Dividing the instructional staff' up will be detrimental to continued joint planning. Will the current assistant superintendents continue to oversee the everyday operation of their schools, as well meet with the curriculum teams assigned to tliem, plan curriculum inservice, and advise building level administrators? Nothing was etcplained in the plan as to how or who would supervise, advise, or oversee the teams other than just saying they would operate under an assistant superintendent. Would the curriculum department still remain intact or would these teams by split up and placed in different areas? How can, or will, joint planning take place? Who will be placed on these teams? What personnel will be cut or moved'? Nothing has been explained. Does the \"appointed\" assistant superintendent in charge of curriculum know about the strategies that have been implemented in our schools? Not since Dennis Glasgow worked as acting\" assistant superintendent for curricuiura has the instructional staff felt as if they were a pan of the school district. Issues were discussed openly, decisions were made jointly, no secrets were discussed behind closed doors, and efforts were made to do the best tilings for the students and the school district. Maybe this is why Dr. Williams removed Mr. Glasgow from this position. Integrity and honesty apparently count for nothing in the eyes of our superintendent. I guess qualifications aren't worth much either, since Mr. Glasgow has the credentials needed to fulfill the position of an assistant superintendent for curriculum. I hope the Board takes a long and hard look at the reorganizational structure that Dr. Williams is proposing. If his contract is bought out by the Board, his structure should not be put in place for someone else to reorganize. Confusion and a feeling of being unsettled would exist again in our District. Should the superintendent and/or Board have some discussion with the staff and other people who will be affected by this plan? This Distiict has some 25,000 students that will be affected by this reorganization. Is this the best tiling for our District? It seems that cutting some of the top administration would address cutting the Special Assistant to the Superintendent and some of the Director level positions. Most of the instructional staff are teachers, working at the same salary level of the teachers in the district. Moving the instructional staff as a curriculum team under an assistant superintendent does cut cost. Many people do not realize that most of the peopleJ LI H - O 5 WED O 3 F' . 0 4 at the tRC are not on administration level contracts. These people work longer hours than most classroom teachers and are paid as a teacher. The Board asked the superintedent to make cuts as tar away from the students as possible, but making certain people directors and retaining special assistants does cut away from the students. Our students benefit from the specialists going into the classrooms because they get special programs, and their teachei s get on the job training in the latest techniques in teaching strategies. Check into the creditials of the specialists in our District. Most of them are award winning teachers, on the state and national level, who have continued their special training to enrich their education and provide better service for our students and our District, It seems as if the superintendent must have something to hide since he wanted this plan approved so quickly. What is Iris underlying message? 'Does he want some of liis special\" people placed in \"special\" places before he leaves? Most of the Board doesn't seem surprised at this action. Is tills another one of his actions which may prove deadly to our District? Does he even care? How much has he cared about our District since he came here? Lip service doesn't show concern. The fact that this will be discussed and possibly voted on at a luncheon meeting next Thursday frightens most teachers. This should be done at a regular session. He says he has done what he was hired to do, get us out of court. He hasn't done that. He is riding on the coat tails of the people in the trenches who have worked with our students for many years. Who has done the ultimate work in the schools? Surely he doesn't think he has, How many davs has he spent in the schools since he was hired compared to the number of days he has spent looking for another job? Making token visits to a school does not help one understand what is being done on a day to day basis. Let him teach in a junior high class for a week, see the new strategies used in an elementary classroom, or do a hands-on activity in a liigh school class. He needs to understand that it has taken many people and many years to get out of coun. Tliis District needs a leader who cares about ail facets of learning, visits with the staff, takes a true interest in the community, is not afraid to listen and imderstand, not one who acts so arrogant and oblivious to the needs of the entire community, Verbiase doesn't become action unless the person is truly dedicated to making this school district the best in the State. Our students and teachers deserve the best! had the best that someone has to offer! We all wish that we1 1990 J BOARD OF DIRECTORS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Special Assistant Labor Relations Communications Technology Administrative Services School Services Instruction I Operations Discipline Alternative Education Student Assignment Pupil Services Human Resources chart 04*23-98 Elementary Assistant Secondary Assistant^ Accelerated Learning Athletics Reading/Language Arts Mathemalics/Science Social Studies Stall Development HIPPY Career \u0026amp; Technical Adult Education Early Childhood Planning/Research/Evaluation Exceptional Children Grants Writer New Futures Federal Programs Parent Involvement VIPS Financial Servicesv**^ Internal Auditor Procurement Plant Services Safety/Security Child Nutrition Transportation LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 June 28, 1999 TO: John Walker, Attorney at Law FROM: SUBJECT: RECEIVED JUN 3 0 1999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORIMG Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent for Instruction Your Request for Organization Chart There have been several drafts of a proposed reorganization plan for the Division of Instruction. One draft was distributed to the staff at a meeting on Thursday, June 17. After their feedback, I made some changes and sent out another draft on Friday, June 18. As I told you, the plan is very much still a draft document and I have made several minor changes since then, a couple after a brief meeting with Dr. Carnine at the end of last week. I am attaching a hard copy of the most recent draft that I have sent to Dr. Carnine. Keep in mind that more changes are likely to occur as we receive more input and think about it. I also have a copy of this latest draft on a disk that you may pick up at my office at your convenience. You may certainly compare the hard copy with what is on my computer, but again, we are changing it almost daily. BAL/adg Attachment cc: Dr. Les Carnine Junious Babbs Brady Gadberry Chris Heller, Esq. Clay Fendly, Esq. zXnn Brown, ODM Reorganization Proposal, June 1999 Division of Instruction, Little Rock School District This proposal to reorganize the Division of Instruction is informed by the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A one-year observation and study of the performance of existing staff, their strengths and interests\nAn identification of gaps in current staffing, leaving several key areas without designated leadership\nAn analysis of \"the work\" to be done, as per the Strategic Plan, the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, the Campus Leadership Plan, Title I, ACSIP, the NSF Project, and Smart Start\nExperience in other urban school districts and reorganizations in those districts\nStudy of recommendations coming from organizations emphasizing quality management principles, teaming, and providing support and services for internal customers (e.g., schools)\nRecommendations from the AA(5T Study presented to the Board of Education in March 1999. The current organizational chart has several weaknesses\n1. 2. 3. 4. 5. There are too many people reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent for efficient and effective management\nPeople are organized according to function, not in multi-disciplinary teams required to do the work identified in the District priorities\nThe current organization does not address the needs to support Campus Leadership teams, to provide coordinated planning, to provide coordinated and targeted technical assistance for school improvement, to coordinate elementary/middle/high school curriculum decisions, etc.\nSeveral people are not in the jobs where they can do their best work and make their most positive contributions\nCurrent organization contributes to a lack of coherent, consistent, aligned decisions in some areas. 1Proposal The following proposal organizes the entire staff of the Division of Teaching and Learning (formerly the Division of Instruction) into multi-disciplinary teams to which the Work Plan Priorities will be assigned in 1999-2000. Instead of each team reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent, some will report to her through team leaders and some through team leaders under the Assistant Superintendent. Although the staff may continue to work in current departments and in current assigned space (to avoid cost and the loss of significant amounts of time required to move offices), the bulk of their work and energy will be with their newly assigned teams. The plan is transitional. In two-three years the Division should again be reorganized, shifting more and more staff to roles more directly supportive of school improvement. There should also be some reductions in the need for central staff at that time. Further, as positions become vacant, each one should be evaluated to determine its future need and whether it is at the appropriate level. The following teams shall be established directly under the Associate Superintendent: PreK-12 Curriculum/Instruction Team (Team Leaders to be Assigned According to Tasks) Dennis Glasgow, Director of Mathematics and Science Vanessa Cleaver, Director of NSF Project Marie McNeal, Director of Social Studies Gene Parker, Director of Secondary English Language Arts Patricia Price, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy TBN, Coordinator of ESL and Foreign Language Carol Green, Director of Career and Technical Education Patty Kohler, Director of Exceptional Children Mable Donaldson, Supervisor of Gifted/Talented Education Leon Adams, Director of Federal Programs TBN, Coordinator of Fine Arts Ray Gillespie, Physical Education 2Lucy Lyon, Director of Libraries/Media Centers and Instructional Technology Barbara Barners, Special Education Supervisor Susan Chapman, Special Education Supervisor Note: According to need, especially for planning curriculum implementation, thematic curriculum, and professional development, teams for elementary, middle, and high school will be formed to include members of the PreK-12 Curriculum/Instruction Team, as well as others from other teams. Also, curriculum audit teams will be formed as schools are identified for sanctions to include members of the Curriculum/Instruction Team, building-level representatives, and representatives from the School Improvement Department. Planning and Development Linda Young, Director of Planning and Development, Team Leader Randy Slenn, Special Education Supervisor VIPs and Parent Involvement Team Debbie Milam, Director of VIPS, Team Leader Coordinator, Title I Parent Involvement Elma Hasberry, Special Education Supervisor Paulette Martin, Director of Adult Education Marion Baldwin, Director of Community Education Department of School Improvement The proposal also includes a recommendation that the department name of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) be dropped in favor of a new department called School Improvement to be supervised by Dr. Kathy Lease, Assistant Superintendent. The teams reporting directly to her will be as follows: Testing and Program Evaluation Team Ed Williams, Supervisor, Team Leader TBN, NSF Program Evaluation Specialist TBN, Title I/ESL Program Evaluation Specialist Yvette Dillingham, Testing Specialist Kathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Supervisor 3Professional Development Team AAarion Woods, Coordinator, Team Leader Selma Hobby, Specialist Sue Walls, Specialist Sary Smith, Special Education Supervisor Eunice Smith, Special Education Supervisor Technical Assistance Team AAona Briggs, ACSIP (formerly COE) and CDP Coordinator, Team Leader Sayle Bradford, Campus Leadership Eddie McCoy, Title I Specialist Cassandra Steele, Special Education Coordinator This new department pulls together a multi-disciplinary group of people, all of whom are responsible to support school improvement and accountability. Depending on the work that needs to be done, all may be working on professional development, test administration, program evaluation, or other assigned tasks. Yet each team includes the necessary levels of expertise and specialization to provide leadership in the assigned areas. These teams will also work closely with those reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent. The following actions will be necessary to implement the proposal: Promotions  Pat Price from Coordinatorto Director of Early Childhood Education and Elementary Literacy, 12-month contract. (In addition to her current early childhood duties, she will assume responsibility for PreK-5 Literacy, will oversee and supervise the elementary reading specialists, and will oversee the HIPPY program and supervise Marian Shead-Jackson.)  Marie McNeal from Coordinatorto Director of Social Studies, 12- month contract. (She is the only curriculum leader who is not a director.) 4Ed Williams from PRE Specialistto Supervisor of Program Evaluation and Testing and Team Leader (He will supervise the two new program evaluators to be hired into this team, and he will oversee any evaluation services that are contracted out.) Linda Youngto a 12-month contract (Her new duties will require her to be on board all year.) Mono Briggs from PRE Specialistto Coordinator, Technical Assistance and Team Leader Debbie Milam from Coordinatorto Director, Parent and Community Programs (She is currently a Coordinator, with coordinators reporting to her) Regssignments  Linda Young from New Futures Liaisonto Director of Planning and Development\n Sene Parker from Director of Reading/English Language Artsto Director of Secondary English Language Arts\n Eddie McCoy from Title I Specialist in Federal Programsto Title I Specialist in the Technical Assistance Team\n Ann Freeman from Science/Smart Start Specialistto Elementary Reading Specialist\n Renee Kovach from Title I Specialist in Federal Programsto Title I Specialist in the Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy Department\n IMS Clerk in Federal Programsto Technical Assistance Team\n Title I Parent Involvement Staff from Federal Programsto Parents and Community Team  Marian Shead-Jackson, HIPPY Supervisor, to report directly to Pat Price\n Mable Donaldson from Exceptional Children, to report directly to the Associate Superintendent.  Lucy Lyon Neal and her staff from Technology Departmentto Curriculum/Instruction Team.  Neglected/Dependent Staff in Federal Programsto Pupil Services.  Liz Lucker from New Futures Departmentto Division of Administrative Services to work with Communities in Schools. 5Note: Sayle Bradford's new position was formerly on the chart as Director of Professional Development. This new plan eliminates that old position. Funding in budget will be used for the new position. New Staff Required  Coordinator, ESLas per OCR recommendations  Coordinator, Fine Artsidentified need  Program Evaluator, NSF1/2 funded through NSF\n1/2 LRSD  Program Evaluator, Title I/ESL3/4 funded through Title I\n1/4 from state allocation for LEP programs  Secretary, Early ChildhoodDirector of Early Childhood is currently the only administrator without clerical assistance  Specialist, Secondary Mathematicsto replace Vanessa Cleaver  4 Elementary Mathematics Specialists2 to be funded through Class- Size Reduction Allocation\n1 to be funded through Title VI\n1 to be funded through funds yet to be identified\n 1 Elementary Language Arts Specialistperhaps to be funded through Reading Excellence Act funds, available in late summer or from Poverty Index funds\nThe determination and commitment of LRSD to improve student achievement significantly, as per the various planning documents and mandates, especially compliance with the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and the collective responsibility requirements of Campus Leadership, require more resources and more focus on teaching and learning and on support for school improvement than in the past. Every effort has been made to seek alternative funding sources for new staff (as indicated above) to reduce the stress on the local operating budget. Implementation Timeline This proposed reorganization should be implemented August 1,1999, or immediately upon approval. 6LRSD Adult Education ESL and Foreign Language Early Childhood Fine Arts org chart draft.doc 07-27-00 kD O o o f7J r . BOARD OF DIRECTORS o 5 E J SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Q. \"J U3 in LU U U u. o O) co Q CO Ct Special Assistant Communications Administrative Services School Services r* chart I I  Labor Relations J Technology Instructror 2 Operations Disa'piine Alternative Education Student Assignment Pupil Services Human Resources Elementary Assistant Secondary Assistant Acceteraled Learning Athletics Reading/Latiguage Arts Mathematics/Science Social Studies Staff Devefcpmenl HIPPY Career \u0026amp; Technical Adult Education Early Childhood Planning/ResearcWEvaluatlon ExcepBcral Children Grants Writer New Futures Federal Programs Parent Involvement VIPS Financial Services Internal Atidibr Proctremenl Plant Services Safety/Security Child IVutrilion Transportation *RECEIVED MAR 1 2005 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATiOfiuflNITnRINR RECEIVED MAR 1 ?M5 . Qcapr f)[: DESEiGl-Etj-i\n'.u.:.-u i.iUa,HITORINR Little Rock School District Organizational Audit March 2005 Consultants\nDennis M. Smith, Ed.D. Robert Klempen Leland Newcomer, Ed.D. n* CONTENTS Historical Overview of the Little Rock School District. 1 Superintendents 100-Day Entry Plan 2 Consultant Team Charge and Methodology 3 Findings and Recommendations 4 Implementation Strategy 7 Organizational Charts Summary of Position Changes 10 20 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The consultants wish to acknowledge the support and cooperation received from Superintendent Roy Brooks and the entire transition team in the preparation of this report.\u0026lt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATIONAL AUDIT MARCH 2005 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT _cu uu uiv commencement of a system which will fully meet the w'ants of the whole community, the first public school in Little Rock opened its doors on August 29 1853, under the direction of the City Council of Little Rock s Committee on Schoo . In February 1869, following closure of public schools during the Civil War, the citizens ofTjtt e Founded on the hope Rock voted to establish a school district and elect a Board of Directors as provided by legislation passed by the Arkansas General Assembly that same year. schools were added to accorranodate expanding population, and in 1987, As years passed, new 14 schools from the Pulaski County Special School Distnct were annexed subsequent to legal proceedings initiated by the Little Rock School District. The district now boasts 47 schools along with alternative programs that serve approximately 26,000 students. While the district experienced great stability in its top leadership for many years (e.g.. Superintendent R. C. Halls tenure from 1909 to 1941 and the employment of eight individuals as Lperintendent from 1960 to 1990), recent years have presented a different picture. Since 1990JO individuals have served in the districts top administrative position as supenntendent and/or interim superintendent. The year 1990 also proved to be a watershed year for student enrollment in Little Rock Public 2000, the city of Little Rock experienced a population growth of 4?^6^7175 J95 to 183433). During that same period LRSD enrollment declined, ^ile African Anrericans comprise 40p=rce,\u0026gt;. ottoe city's nercent of the students enrolled in public schools are.----------- , . It is also significant to note that, as of 2003, almost 10,000 of the city s children are enrolled in private schools, and that number is increasing. African American (24 percent Caucasian). In May of 2000 the citizens of Little Rock approved an school building repairs, renovations and expansions d._ established a dedicated building maintenance fund. aimual 5 mil tax increase earmarked for district-wide, technology upgrades, and Also of historical importance is the LRSD desegregation case. Almost 50 years ago the Little Rock School District began the process to desegregate its schools. The governor s attempt to __ KOCK icnooi u c r /-oTitroi Miah \u0026lt;\nrhnnl in Sent ember o block the integration of schools resulted in the crisis c,, _  , , 1957. Federafcourts have been involved in LRSD schools for much of the past three decades. Rock at Central High School in September of 1In 2002 the federal judge held that the district had substantially complied with all of its obligations except those related to evaluating programs, policies and/or procedures desired to improve and remediate African-Am eric an achievement. The court has ordered the distnct to complete specified program evaluations with assistance of outside evaluators and file a on or before October 15, 2006. Objections, if any, must be compliance report with the court--------------- . filed by November 15,2006. Subsequently, the federal court will hold a compliance heanng to determine if the district has met its obligations and should be released from further supervision and monitoring. SUPERINTENDENTS 100-DAY ENTRY PLAN During his first 100 days as superintendent of the Little Rock School District, Dr. Roy Brooks fulfilled his commitment to visit each school in the district at least once and, in fact, visited some as many as ten times. These school and department site visits provided the supenntendent opportunities to hear directly from staff members about their concerns, challenges, and hopes for the district Of note were the breakfast and lunch meetings at four schools and four administrative sites which provided the superintendent opportunities for personal interaction with more than 300 staff members. The community forums, neighborhood coffees, and meetings with teachers, ministers, business leaders, PTA Council and Superintendents Student Cabinet facilitated dialog with another 900 interested community members. The primary issues brought forward during these meetings related to accountability\nstudent achievement\ncurriculum\nleadership stability\nparent and community involvemerit\nschool choice options- West Little Rock school\nstudent discipline and attendance\nunequal, and yguably inequitable, funding among schools\nteacher attendance\nclass size\nlack of matenals, books and other resources\nneighborhood issues such as boarded-up houses near schools\ncustomer service\nextended year education\nalternative schools\nportable classrooms\nsite-based management\nschool renovation and maintenance needs\ntechnology assistance\nlimited ESL resources\nand inadequate professional development. This information along with input garnered from surveys completed by members of the Superintendents Student Cabinet, the PTA Council, and Teachers of the Year was considered in the development of orgamzational audit recommendations. It is important to note that, despite serious concerns, community members expressed support for LRSD schools and the accomplishments of teachers in the classrooms. The consultants would also be remiss if they did not acknowledge the professionalism demonstrated by teachers and staff members alike. Although the Little Rock School District has some of the best performing schools in the state, it is also clear that many schools are challenged and struggling. In fact, as a result of the most recent No Child Left Behind legislation, 27 of the 47 schools within the Little Rock Schotfr District are failing in performance and have been placed on the school improvement list. The Superintendent and the Board of Education are committed to establishing a system which fully meets the wants of the whole community. With that in mind, the Board recognizes the pivotal 2role the Superintendent plays in providing vision and focus in achieving the following priorities\nincreased student opportunities and achievement, a safe and positive learning environment a competent and professional staff, wise and efficient use of public monies, provision of state-of- the-art facilities, and increased responsiveness and accountability to LRSD parents, sWents, staff and the community. In turn, the Board supports the Superintendent in these endeavors by setting clear expectations and identifying the parameters within which he must operate as he achieves results. CONSULTANT TEAM CHARGE AND FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT The consultants were hired to provide the Little Rock School District Board of Education and Superintendent an independent, objective analysis of the dishict. In doing so, the consuhants were to specifically compare the most effective school practices with those m the Little Rock school system and detail areas of strength and specific recommended areas for improvement. To that end the consultants were to conduct interviews, analyze the Little Rock school system, and report on those results to the school board in March 2005 with a specific recoi^ended action plan. The focus of the consultants efforts was to be on identifying practices that will lead to increased and improved student achievement in the Little Rock School District. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED The consultants were hired in September 2004 by the Board of Education at the recommendation irganizational audit of the Little Rock school system. To 250 individuals within the Little Rock School of the Superintendent to conduct an oi accomplish this, the consultants interviewed over . District and community. Interviewees included classroom teachers, school pnncipals, distnct administrators, union officials, the educational foundation, community members, business leaders, each of the individual board members, and the superintendent. The interviews ranged from 30 minutes to 2 hours. Questions were asked relative to each of the six identified areas o effective schools\napplied governance and management, strategic planning, performance^d accountability system, issue resolution and decision making, defined organizational structure. and standardized protocols. consultants worked closely with the transition team of district staff consisting of In addition, the consultants worked closely witn me iransuioi icam Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources\nSadie Mitchell, Associate Supennfrndent for School Services\nKaren DeJamette, Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation\nOlivine Roberts, Associate Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction\nSuellen Vann, Director of Communications\nand Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services. The consultants give oreat credit and appreciation to the transition team for the invaluable assistance they provided e consultants, particularly as it applies to the reorganization structure^ Additionally the consultants maintained close communication with the Friday Law Firm to ensure that a recommendations are compatible with Arkansas law. o' 3FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Strategic Planning The strategic plan developed by the Board of Education in 2003 was reviewed by the consultants and discussed with stakeholders. Although the objectives of the LRSD strategic plan are laudable portions of the plan are not results-based and data-driven. The consultants found little evidence of an accountability system tied to the strategic plan. Furthermore, in their interviews with staff the consultants found that the current LRSD strategic plan seems to have little influence on the day-to-day actions of administrators or their decision making. It is, therefore, recommended that the Little Rock School District consider revamping the strategic plan to clearly identify the highest priorities as well as an accountability system in which executive staff are able to report back specific evidence of results. This plan must be linked with the budgeting process to ensure that goals established by the Board are driving the human and physical resources of the district. Applied Governance and Management In their review of the district, the consultants found that the school board is a highly involved, caring group of individuals who place the children of the Little Rock School District as their highest priority In July 2004 the school board hired a new superintendent, signaling an apparent mandate to address inefficiencies within the school system and concerns relative to inconsistent student achievement. The consultants review of the governance and management practices within the district found that the Board has done an excellent job of providing the Superintendent with the authority and freedom to work with staff to accomplish the major priorities within the school system. The Board and Superintendent would be well served to engage in Board govemance/management training to refine and reinforce the role of the governing board m relation to the role of the Superintendent to ensure the optimal operation of the school system. Performance and Accountability System The consultants found that, although an evaluation system is in place, a direct linkage between the evaluation system and the goals established by the Superintendent and Board of Education is not evident. Therefore, the priorities of the Board and the Superintendent should be aligned with the performance and accountability system for individuals within the district. The consultants observations point to an over-reliance on accountability for processes and activities as opposed to results. The Little Rock school system must establish clearly identified, results-oriented objectives for staff as well as develop an evaluation system that directly links staff accountability to the achievement of these results. 4The consultants also received significant feedback regarding the physical location of central services for the LRSD. Services such as student registration, curriculum and instruction, special education, facilities, transportation, and others are housed in 10 different locations across the greater Little Rock area. This lack of consolidation and coordination is fundamental to many ot die communication problems experienced by staff and community members alike and creates a disjointed system of administrative services to stakeholders. It is the recommendation of the consultants that consideration be given to the consolidation of all the administrative services into one facility. It is recognized that this will require extensive review and it is recommended that a blue ribbon task force that would include business leaders be involved in examination of this situation. Issue Resolution and Decision Making The consultants found many outstanding and dedicated individuals within the Little Rock School District administration whose efforts reflect a general desire to support teachers, staff, and members of the public. Having said that, there does not appear to be an institutionalized passion and strategy in place to assist individual managers in addressing complex and oftentimes emotional issues, making difficult decisions, and reducing the likelihood of risks based on systematic and sound rational thinking practices. It appears, by the bureaucracy that has been created, the first and only alternative considered when a problem anses is to add central services staff. It is essential that the district provide the training for problem solving and decision m^ng to assist staff in addressing the myriad of challenging situations that occur. These analytic skills and management tools will be essential as leaders at all levels embrace the new philosophy. This emphasis on bureaucratic processes and procedures has diminished the focus on the tme mission of the administrative staff, which is to support the organizational missionstudent achievement. Standardized Protocol The most effective school systems have clearly defined and standardized practices in place which address both daily operational issues and crisis situations which may occur within the organization. These practices and procedures are essential to eliminate guesswork when an issue o7crisis arises. Generally, these protocols will be in writing, or at the least, be well known to all within the organization as a result of effective communication. The Little Rock school system suffers from having a vast bureaucracy with multiple layers embedded within that bureaucracy. There is not an understanding of who can provide needed direction, and there are often mixed messages conveyed to staff, teachers principals et^ resulting confusion about how to respond and react to a given situation. For the most part, there is little evidence that there are consistent, uniform, and standardized protocols in place across h district. 5Following the reorganization of the Little Rock School Districts administrative structoe priority must be placed on establishing specific protocols and practices in the areas of budge , finance, facilities, communications, and Board governance and management. Organizational Structure and is fundamental to many In the opinion of the consultants, this is the area of greatest concern of the problems being experienced within the school district. The LRSD is cle^ly overstaffed at the central office level. This overstaffing has resulted in the inability of the school system to effectively serve the needs of its clientsthe children, teachers, and pnncipals at its school sites. In fact contrary to the intent, the continual adding of positions has produced an opposite effect, that of providing less effective service to those who need it the most. The consultants extensive review of the organization also indicated the multiple and\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_908","title":"Personnel Directory, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/1993"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","School administrators","School board members","School employees","School management and organization","School principals","School superintendents","Teachers"],"dcterms_title":["Personnel Directory, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/908"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nI ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff PERSONNEL DIRECTORY NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent 1992 - 1993 SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, Arkansas BOARD OF EDUCATION Mable Mitchell, President (September, 1995) East LR Community Complex Pat Blackstone, Vice President (September, 1993) New Futures for LR Youth Prentice Dupins, Secretary (September, 1994)  Sylvan Hills High School Lynn Hamilton, Member (September, 1994) Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, LR Dixie Harrison, Member (September, 1993) Oak Grove High School J. w. Johnson, Member (September, 1994) Shiloh Baptist Church, NLR Marty Moore, Member (September, 1995) 5006 Glenview Blvd. 72117 3409 Bunker Hill 72116 431 McCain Blvd. F-23 72116 4103 Arlington 72116 One Shady Valley Court 72116 437 West Fourth Street 72114 4417 Central 72118 TOTAL NUMBER OF SCHOOLS IN DISTRICT Secondary: Senior High-----------Middle Schools--------- 1 3 Elementary------------------ 16 Handicapped Center---------- 1 Alternative School---------- 1 TOTAL 22 945-2431 753-5128 791-0267 758-2209 753-1461 771-4506 758-3181 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND SCHOOLS (Addresses/Telephone Numbers) Supeiintendent's Office---------- 2700 Poplar Street --- 771-8000 Smith, James ............................ 771-8006 Superintendent of Schools Bolling, Scharmel ..................... . Coordinator-InformationqJ. Services ~lbli'i~a=e, Jig\nt\ntye .. ft.Y.I~ . '\"9l~t\u0026gt;),.s=-\u0026lt; . ... Secretary /B.94-.rd Mjltte.F~ ~ V ~Amil , -1taS i\"1=   -.~f ~1-. M . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ass't Superintendent-Desegregation Wooldridge, Avis ...................... . Secretary Morris, James ......................... . Director-Personnel Collins, Sandra ....................... . Secretary Ander son, Donna ....................... . Receptionist/Substitute Teachers 771-8013 771-8006 771-8016 771-8017 771-'8066 771-8018 771-8000 Office of Instr~t~onal e~vices - 2700 Poplar Street _ Jones, Geae ~'3{.. ~ ................ 771-8019 Ass't Superintendent-Instruction Smith, Virginia ........................ 771-8020 Secretary Crawford, Esther ...................... . Director-Elementary Education Platt, Yolanda ........................ . Secretary Chadwick, Dana ........................ . Director-Secondary Education Williams, Sharon ...................... . Facilitator-Drug/Alcohol Program Wasson, Doyalene ..................... Secretary Dyer, Jim ............................. . Director-Instructional Services Pharo, Jann ........................... . Area Specialist-Chapter I Scott, Paul ........................... . Parent Coordinator Barnett, Michelle ..................... . Secretary Martin, Letitia ....................... . Coordinator-Instructional Computers Staggs, Nova .......................... . Coordinator-Language Arts McCauley, Gloria ...................... Secretary Kincl, Ann ............................ . 771-8021 771-8022 771-8023 771-8037 771-8024 771-8048 771-8161 771-8161 771-8049 771-8045 771-8046 771-8047 771-8054 Supervisor-Gifted/Talented Gilkey, Barbara ...................... 771-8055 PAC/Social Worker Hickman, Christine ..................... 771-8072 Parent Coordinator Richbourg, Mary .................... 771-8056 Secretary --- 771-8020 Instructional Services continued: Wise, Eugene ........................... 771-8051 Supervisor-Vocational Education Matthews, Annette ...................... 771-8052 Vocational Evaluator Naylor, Janet .......................... 771-8052 Paraprofessional Mills, Dean ............................ 771-8053 Paraprofessional (Special Services--Administrative Annex) Phaup, Steve ........................... 771-8032 Director-Special Services Stokes, Phyllis 771-8033 Secretary Smith, Gloria .......................... 771-8038 Supervisor-Special Education Dillinger, Rellia  771-8034 Supervisor-Special Education Hudson, Nell ........................... 771-8036 Secretary Chambers, Deane ........................ 771-8057 Secretary Moore, Nancy ........................... 374-6943 Psychologist Camp, Drew ............................. 771-8040 Psychological Examiner Spencer, Deborah ....................... 771-8042 Psychological Examiner Woodard, James ......................... 771-8041 Psychological Examiner McMillen, Martha ....................... 771-8068 Homebound Teacher Harris, Cathy .......................... 771-8059 Homebound Teacher  Bray, Pandora .......................... 771-8039 Secretary Instructional Materials Center at Administrative Annex 22nd and Poplar--------------------------------- 771-8070 Stewart, Jo ................... 771-8071 Coordinator-VIPS/Media Specialists Boardman, Petrevia ..................... 771-8070 Secretary Smith, Bill ............................ 771-8073 Electronics Technician Duvall, Billy .......................... 771-8073 Electronics Technician Student Affairs------------- 2700 Poplar Street-------- 771-8010 Acklin, Bobby .......................... 771-8009 Ass't Superintendent-Student Affairs Juckett, Sandra ........................ 771-8010 Secretary Haynie, John ........................... 372-6703 Supervisor-Transportation DuPriest, Johnnie ...................... 372-6703 Secretary Business Office--------------~--- 2700 Poplar Street --- 771-8012 Donald Watkins .......... ~ .............. 771-8012 Ass't Superintendent-Business Services Mushinski, JoAnn .... -................... 771-8012 Secretary Daniels, Greg .......................... 771-8025 Director-Computer Services Holloway, Jim .......................... 771-8026 Computer Programmer Morris, Nancy .......................... 771-8027 Secretary Mitchell, Ruby ......................... 771-8028 Head Bookkeeper Cochran, Theresa ....................... 771-8029 Bookkeeper Black, Mikki ........................... 771-8031 Bookkeeper Campbell, Murielene .................... 771-8067 Bookkeeper Wirges, Elizabeth ...................... 771-8030 Bookkeeper Ward, Doyne ............................ 771-8014 Director-Purchasing Ness, Margaret ........................ 771-8015 Secretary Williams, Tonya ........................ 771-8044 Production Clerk Athletic Department--------------- Stadium-------------- 771-8154 Goss, Gary, ........................... 771-8153 Director-Athletics Coble, Ruby ............................ 771-8154 Secretary Maintenance Department------------ 2600 Poplar Street --- 771-8075 Massey, Jerry .......................... 771-8076 Director-School Plant Services Crownover, Alan ........................ 771-8077 Supervisor-School Plant Services Stone, Georgia Ann ..................... 771-8075 Secretary McMunn , Kim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . 7 71- 8 0 7 8 Secretary School Food Services------------- 2400 Poplar Street---- 771-8060 Pearson, James ......................... 771-8061 Director-School Food Services Satterfield, Marsha .................... 771-8062 Coordinator-Nutrition Glover, Pam ............................ 771-8060 Secretary NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Secondary - 5 NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL, 11th/12th West Campus .............. 101 West Twenty-Second .. 771-8100 Thompson, Gregg, Prin ..... 1412 Cornflower ........ 834-4829 NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL, 9th/10th East Campus .............. 2400 Lakeview Rd ....... 771-8200 Kirspel, Ken, Principal .. 5904 North Hills Blvd ... 835-3369 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SCHOOL.. ..... 2300 Lakeview Road ..... 771-8250 Wiseman, Ginny, Principal. 1211 Silver Creek ...... 834-0929 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL.. .... 4601 Ridge Road ......... 771-8155 Arthur Tucker, Principal ... 9714 Ithica, LR ........ 565-3005 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL.. .... 5500 Lynch Drive ........ 945-1446 Cook, Kathy, Principal ..... 1707 Crestwood Rd ....... 771-1901 Elementary - 16 AMBOY Elementary .......... . Ford, Jane, Principal ... . BELWOOD Elementary ........ . Walker, Jess, Principal .. BOONE PARK Elementary .-.... . Siegel, Pat, Principal .. . CENTRAL Elementary Lowe, Kaye, Principal ... . CRESTWOOD Elementary ...... . Wilson, Linda, Principal .. GLENVIEW Elementary ....... . Allen, Harold, Principal .. INDIAN HILLS Elementary .... Jackson, Susie, Principal. LAKEWOODE lementary Power, Portia, Principal .. LYNCH DRIVE Elementary  .... . Kelso, Beverly .......... . MEADOWP ARK Elementary .... . Zeigler, James, Principal. NORTH HEIGHTS Elementary ... Jackson, Fran, Principal .. PARK HILL Elementary ...... . Snowden, Dana, Principal .. PIKE VIEW Elementary ...... . Crites, Diane, Principal .. REDWOODE lementary ........ . Chancellor, Linda, Prin .. . ROSE CITY Elementary ...... . Tweedle, I?a~erine, Prin .. SEVENTH ST. Elementary .... . Paul, Marsha, Principal .. . Special Schools: 2400 W. 58th .......... . 26 Coronado Circle ..... . 3902 Virginia Lane .... . 20 Patty Lane, Sherwood. 1400 Crutcher ......... . 1712 War Eagle ........ . 2300 Poplar Street .... . 6605 Allwood .......... . 1901 Crestwood Dr ..... . 5708 Dublin Street .... . 4841 Edmond ........... . 412 West Twenty-Second. 6800 Indian Hills Dr .. . 6407 Sherry Dr. LR ..... . 1800 Fairway Ave ....... . 17 East Lake Dr ....... . 5800 Alpha Street ..... . 4120 Royal Oak Drive .. . 2300 Eureka Gardens ... . 1517 Pulaski, LR ...... . 4901 No. Allen ........ . 2108 Whyte Drive ...... . 3801 JFK Blvd., ....... . 2500 Vancouver, LR .... . 441 McCain Blvd ....... . 5101 N. Hills Blvd .... . 401 Redwood ........... . 1801 Reservior Rd ...... . 100 Earle Street ...... . 2011 Aztec ............ . 1200 East Seventh ..... . 59 Kings Park, LR ..... . 771-8185 835-5591 771-8195 835-7498 374-8630 834-2982 771-8275 753-0439 771-8190 771-1951 945-3467 758-6512 835-5622 664-1729 771-8270 771-2395 945-3549 758-8082 945-7612 374-3517 771-8180 945-2240 771-8175 228-7036 771-8170 758-8738 945-2185 227-5026 945-1962 835-8749 372-4660 227-4055 BARING CROSS CENTER ........ 901 Parker ............. 374-1286 Kellar, Johnny, Principal. Box 186, Wooster ....... 335-7105 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL ......... 1301 Main Street ....... 374-6943 Hawkins, Russell, Prin ... 2000 Schiller, LR ...... 374-1869 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 1992 - 1993 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF PERSONNEL ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ABRAHAM, FRED L. JR. ZIP 225-1027 7820 W MARKHAM, #606 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER ACKLIN, ANETTE 834-8614 9 GREENVIEWC IRCLE SHERWOODA R 72116 BOONE PARK CHAPTER I AIDE ACKLIN, BOBBY J. 329-9838 211 HIGHWAY3 65 CONWAYA R 72032 ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPT.-STUDENT AFFAIRS ACLIN, CAROL ANN 758-4802 1717 BERESFORD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM FIFTH YEAR ADAMS, DON A. 771-4490 3108 N CYPRESS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER ADAMS, JESSIE L. 758-1004 1717 BEECH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ALBRIGHT, BETTYE JO 753-4659 4513 OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT ALEXANDER, CATHERINE L. 758-4260 21 VALERIE CT. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 PARK HILL SECOND YEAR ALEXANDER, RICHARD C. 835-8207 6005 GLENHAVEN PL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 PHYSICAL EDUCATION I *13/12 ALEXANDER, ROBERT D. 945-7494 7802 HWY 70 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER ALFORD, LEO 758-0044 6122 ESS LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL CROSSING GUARD ALLEN, CAROLYN H. 835-6154 401 CLUB RD., C-17 SHERWOODA R 72116 AMBOY THIRD YEAR ALLEN, DINAH M. 835-1968 7709 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS ALLEN, EVA M. 2400 MCCAIN #1004-1 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 REDWOOD H.O.T.S. TEACHER ALLEN, HAROLD BLAKELY 758-6512 412 W 22ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 GLENVIEW PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY 1 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ALLEN, SHIRLEY ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 376-6578 1624 SCHAER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE MANAGER ALLEN, SYLVIA JO 758-6512 412 W 22ND ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 ENGLISH III ALLGEYER, DAVID C. 758-6173 5901 J.F.K. BLVD APT 3221 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 FOUN. ART, DESIGN I, II ALSUP, BARBARA K. 758-1971 120 E. 23RD STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE MANAGER AMICK, KAREN Y. 771-2782 4909 LAKEVIEW RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CRESTWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE AMICK, KAREN Y. 771-2782 CRESTWOOD AMIS, GLEN P. 843-8858 NLRHS-11 / 12 AMIS, PAUL F. 4909 LAKEVIEW ROAD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE RT 2 BOX 46 AUSTIN AR 72007 PHYSICS, PHYS. SCIENCE II, PRINCIPLES OF TECH. 982-2271 821 MCHENRY ST NLRHS-11/12 ELECTRONICS ANDERSON, DONNA S. 758-0235 3116 N. MAGNOLIA ADMN. OFFICE RECEPTIONIST/SUBSTITUTE ANDERSON, SHARON A. 834-1552 1609 SARATOGA CRESTWOOD SIXTH YEAR ANDREWS, GINGER 753-6109 NLRHS-11 / 12 ANDREWS, MARY E. 5509 MCARTHUR #5 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 758-6274 4009 ORANGE NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ARENDT, CONNIE M. 753-1934 5825 NO. CEDAR INDIAN HILLS COMPENSATORYA IDE ARMAN, MARY K. JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 TEACHERS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 945-0530 412 MEADOWP ARK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOWP ARK PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE, COMPUTERL AB AIDE ARMBRUST, STEFANIE T. 450-9953 #8 BRIERWOOD CONWAY. AR 72032 ADMN. OFFICE EARLY CHILDHOOD-SPECIAL EDUCATION ARNOLD, MICHAEL 843-7500 17 TALBERT DR CABOT AR 72023 WAREHOUSE LEAD ELECTRICIAN ARNOLD, SHEILA 945-7546 2201 WASHINGTO~ NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD CHAPTER I LAB/KINDERGARTEN AIDE *49/45 2 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ASHLEY, KATHY M. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 771-4994 #4 CANYON CT. ALT CENTER SPECIAL ED K-6 ASHMORE, REGINALD L. 371-0564 803 WALNUT BUS DRIVER ASHMORE, TIMOTHY D. 371-0564 803 WALNUT CITY NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ASKEW, NATHANIEL L. 371-0851 1523 W. 22ND ST BARING CROSS SELF CONTAINED MR ATHERTON, RITA M. 945-4745 #2 FLOWERS LANE CENTRAL ELEM SECOND YEAR ATWOOD, WILLIAM E. 758-6523 47 SUNSET DR AMBOY CROSSING GUARD AUSTIN, CLYDELL 374-7522 2103 PRATT RD BOONE PARK CUSTODIAN BABB, DENNIS D. 982-4179 1408 TAMARA PARK HEAD MECHANIC BABB, JULIE D. 982-4179 1408 TAMARA PARK BUS DRIVER BACCUS, GLORIA BELL 945-9483 1000 F STREET SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BADGETT, SUSAN R. 227-5683 8101 CANTRELL #1904 SEVENTH STREET SECOND YEAR BAHIL, ELIZABETH ANN 758-2485 17 EMERALD CR NLRHS-09/10 MEDIA SPECIALIST BAILEY, PAULETTE 835-7104 5805 EAGLE CREEK RD NLRHS-09/10 KEYBOARDING, ENG. II BAILEY, REBECCA S. 758-3620 6008 FOXBORO DRIVE BELWOOD SECOND/THIRD YEARS BAKALEKOS, RAYMA J. 753-1707 5511 SONORA DR. AMBOY LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BAKER, EUGENIA R. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LIT'1'LE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 945-1689 806 \"G\" ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE BAKER, KATHERINE A. 945-1049 708 EAST BETHANY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL 3 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION BAKER, LORIE A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 224-4457 #16 FONTENAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE SPEECH THERAPIST EARLY CHILDHOOD BAKER, SHARON D. 753-6873 3902 SUSAN CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW EARLY MORNING AIDE BAKER, SHARON D. 753-6873 3902 SUSAN CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW TEACHER AIDE BAKER, SHEILA M. 661-8897 PO BOX 4122 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ALT CENTER PRE-EMPLOYMENTS KILLS COORDINATOR 1504 W. 13TH ST. BAKER, TONYA R. 374-1397 NLRHS-09/10 BALLARD, CHERYLL. FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 664-1729 6407 SHERRY DR AMBOY CHAPTER I AIDE *31/32 BALLARD, FREIDA C. 753-3397 2605 SHILL CT PIKE VIEW SECOND YEAR BANKS, SHERECIA L. 374-7074 201-B E 16TH NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BARNES, REGINALD E. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 753-3920 2401 LAKEVIEW RD. APT P-7 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 ATHLETICS, HEALTH BARNES, SCARLETT A. 834-0124 105-C ALMOND COVE BELWOOD SIXTH YEAR BARNETT, JEAN M. CRESTWOOD BARNETT, JUDY K. 5011 OAKLAWND R. LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 753-5869 804 SILVER HILL RD. AMBOY SECRETARY BARNETT, LOU ANN 834-3417 8313 TOLTEC COVE INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN BARNETT, MICHELLE S. 835-6464 4 WINCREST DR ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-DIRECTOR BARNETT, PATRICIA B. SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 835-1766 6713 PONTIAC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD GUIDANCE/OFFICE SECRETARY BATTLES, AUTREANA M. 945-4230 913 BRANTLEY AVE. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN BATTLES, REVA T. 329-5573 1028 DAVIS CONWAYA R 72032 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM COUNSELOR *41(.91)/42(.09) 4 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BAUMAN, ERNESTINE 374-1124 1311 W. 8TH ST. BOONE PARK EARLY MORNING AIDE BEACH, SUE M. 753-7792 4822 ARLINGTON NLRHS-11/12 ENGLISH III BEAIRD, GARY W. 490-0183 P.O. BOX 641 LAKEWOODM IDDLE CUSTODIAN BEARD, WILLIAM C. 758-3637 2203 COORS DR NLRHS-11/12 SPANISH I, III BEARDEN, KARYL S. 227-9367 1720 SANFORD, #4 ROSE CITY ELEM FIRST/SECOND YEARS BEAVERS, ESTHER L. 835-2667 6004 WOODVIEWS OUTH LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION BECK, LEE CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 COLLEGE STATION A 72053 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 SHERWOODA R 72116 224-3503 701 GREENMOUNTAIND R 1612 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE ELEMENTARY/PFEIFER CAMP BEESON, D. GAYLE 835-3342 116 WILD OAK DR SHERWOODA R 72120 INDIAN HILLS THIRD/FOURTH YEAR BELEW, REBECCA J. 985-2941 102 FOX DELL CR. JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION BELL, ANGELIA M. 758-7746 1723 W. 19TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BELL, ANITA J. 490-1860 NLRHS-09/10 42 PLANTATION DR COUNSELOR A. LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 1207 W. SCENIC APT T-14 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BELL, PATRICIA 758-2188 NLRHS-11/12 BENEDICT, TAMMY P. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 794-2191 8125 ZUBER RD BENTON AR 72015 BOONE PARK KINDERGARDEN BENIGHT, PATRICIA A. 771-2616 310 EAST \"A\" NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION BENNETT, LINDA S. 834-1212 218 ALANBROOKA VE SHERWOODA R 72116 PIKE VIEW GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE *44(.70)/45(.30) BENNETT, PAMELA J. 327-2908 2470 MISTY LN CONWAYA R 72032 RIDGEROAD C.O./PERS.-LIVING SKILLS BENNETT, SUE 758-0743 NLRHS-09/10 4104 BUNKER HILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GUDIANCE COUNSELOR, DEPT. CHAIR. 5 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BENSON, PRISCILLA L. CITY ZIP 834-8589 8209 TALL OAKS SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-11/12 THEATRE TECH I,II,III, SR. CABINET BEST, JAMES PAUL ALT CENTER BEVILL, EDDIE C. 13200 CHENAL PKWY #205 SCIENCE TEACHER 7-12 835-2371 6708 PONTIAC INDIAN HILLS FOURTH YEARS BIBLES, DANNA I. 945-3167 908 GREENDALE ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BILLINGS, JAMES M. LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2211 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 791-0371 5200 CEDAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 T.V. PRObUCTION, I, II, DEPT CHAIR BILLINGS, LEE ANN 791-0731 5200 CEDAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY SPECIAL EDUCATION BISHOP, ROY G 372-3770 2216 W LONG 17TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LAKEWOODM IDDLE AMERICANH ISTORY, DEPT. CHAIR. BITTLE, DIEDRA E. 758-7717 2112 MIDDLETON DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY EARTH SCIENCE, DEPT. CHAIR BLACK, HAZELL. 791-2510 2036 FENDLEY DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET COMPUTER LAB AIDE - CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .50 BLACK, MICHEELA J. 753-5542 221 TEXAS AVE. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE BOOKKEEPER BLACKMON, LYNN 834-2016 5310 GENERAL SAMULES #20 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 CENTRAL ELEM COMPENSATORYE DUCATIONA IDE BLACKWELL, MARY N. 835-0458 1227 COOLHURST SEVENTH STREET FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS BLANKENSHIP, WILLIAM 9809 SOUTHWEST CRESTWOOD CUSTODIAN BLUE, RODRICK A. 1915 PULASKI LYNCH DRIVE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BOARDMAN, PETREVIA A. SHERWOODA R 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 758-5196 4518 CRESTLINE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/TEXTBOOKS BONA, DIANNA H. 661-9959 4301 SOUTH LOOKOUT LAKEWOODM IDDLE ART (.43) BONA, S. RENEE 758-0376 REDWOOD 3519 N. CYPRESS FIRST YEAR 6 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION BONNER, ELAINE 565-2494 ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT M. LAKEWOODE LEM #1 BROOKVIEW CIRCLE KINDERGARTEN L. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 BORDERS, MYRTLE 945-4216 -6505 FARMSTEAD CROSSING GUARD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE BORDERS, MYRTLE L. 945-4216 6505 FARMSTEAD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BOUTWELL, STEVE 225-3986 ROSE CITY BOWERS, BILLY A. R. 801 S RODNEY PARHAM Al0-G LITTLE LIFE SCIENCE, EARTH SCIENCE ROCK, AR 6813 FAIRFIELD DR. LITTLE ROCK AR NLRHS-11/12 P.E. I, II, ATHLETICS, SENIOR CABINET BOWERS, SHIRLEY I. 565-6741 6813 FAIRFIELD DR LITTLE ROCK AR RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION, DEPT. CHAIR. BOYD, MICHAEL L. 945-8192 2501 E WASHINGTON AVE NO LITTLE ROCK GLENVIEW LEAD CUSTODIAN BRADFORD, BRIANO. AR 945-1450 3908 ROGERS ROSE CITY ELEM CUSTODIAN BRADFORD, PATRICIA R. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 753-5286 4205 DUNKELD CENTRAL ELEM READING RECOVERY BRADLEY, DORAL. 221-2955 13316 WHITE FIR RIDGEROAD READING BRADLEY, JERRY, JR. 663-5312 1321 S PIERCE BUS DRIVER BRADLEY, MARIE 771-4922 529 MELANIE LANE SEVENTH STREET NURSE BRADLEY, PAULAS. 327-5680 1640 SO. DONAGHEY MEADOWP ARK KINDERGARTEN BRADSHAW, DONNA G. 834-8091 5103 RHOADS LANE NLRHS-09/10 TEACHER AIDE-SPECIAL BRANCH, BOBBY J. 835-3614 73 SPRING GROVE DR. NLRHS-09/10 PHYSICAL SCIENCE BRANCH, GLENN D. ED NO LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR CONWAYA R NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 72209 72209 72114 72117 72116 72212 72204 72ll8 72032 72120 72116 73 SPRING GROVE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 BRANCH, SUSAN I. CRESTWOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, DEPT. CHAIR 4006 WOODDALE OR. GIFTED/TALENTED 7 LITTLE ROCK, AR *42(.70)/40(.30) 72209 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY LOCATION ASSIGNMENT BRANNON, WILLIAM O. 758-7423 4201 REDDING LANE CRESTWOOD LEAD CUSTODIAN BRANT, PAULETTE 753-9190 3525 LAKEVIEW RD NLRHS-09/10 SPANISH I BRAY, CHERYL PANDORA 945-9434 13 SANDLEFOOT COVE ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY BRENTS, HELEN A. 753-4261 5016 PARKER BUS DRIVER BREWER, BARBARA 945-5934 #5 KNIGHT DRIVE ROSE CITY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT BRIGGS, ANGELA MARIE 791-2336 431 MCCAIN NPV 112C CENTRAL ELEM THIRD YEAR BRIGGS, MAE KATHERINE 851-2115 #6 VALLEY VIEW CT GLENVIEW SPEECH THERAPIST BRIGHT, WANDA L. 753-1716 916 W 51ST SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I AIDE BROADWAY, JOSALYN L. 771-0264 5516 CRESCENT DR BOONE PARK BA AIDE BROOKS, DONNA S. 835-8646 16 SALLISAW CT *46/40 ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK, A NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK A MAUMELLE AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK, A INDIAN HILLS MULTIPLE HANDICAPPED AIDE BROOKS, DONNA S. 835-8646 16 SALLISAW CT NO LITTLE ROCK AR INDIAN HILLS EARLY MORNING AIDE BROOKS, EDDIE L. 758-6218 1924 MOSS-APT B NO LITTLE ROCK AR RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN BROOKS, FAY M. 758-0272 125 SHERIDAN NO LITTLE ROCK AR PARK HILL EARLY MORNING AIDE BROOKS, GWENDOLYNB . 835-0460 75 CREEKWOOD JACKSONVILLE AR NLRHS-11/12 DRAMA I, TECH THEATRE, COS./MAKEUP BROSH, LEE ANN 868-4066 BOONE PARK 9524 TWIN MT. LANE SPEECH THERAPY A. ROLAND AR 72118 72116 72117 72118 72117 72116 72202 72118 72118 72116 72116 72114 72116 72076 72135 BROUGHTON, JUDY 758-7198 GLENVIEW 6601 COUNTRYSIDE SIXTH YEAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 BROWN, ANGELIA M. 753-9772 929 ROSECLAIR CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE 8 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BROWN, BARBARA E. L. CITY ZIP 753-0708 4209 NO CYPRESS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY C.O. (.50) BROWN, CANDY R. 945-1370 4219 CORAL ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 AD.MN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL BROWN, CHRISTINE 771-0154 2206 COORS LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BROWN, CHRISTINE 771-0154 2206 COORS LANE NO LITTLE AMBOY PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE BROWN, ELLEN J. 771-1202 3505 DUNKELD NO LITTLE NLRHS-09/10 GIRLS P.E., HEALTH BROWN, JEFFREY D. 834-5694 1212 KOEHLER SHERWOOD, LAKEWOODM IDDLE ATHLETICS, EARTH SCIENCE BROWN, PAUL W. 834-2311 117 ALMOND COVE NO LITTLE NLRHS-09/10 ATHLETICS, CIVICS, WORLD PROBLEMS BROWN, PAUL W. 834-2311 117 ALMOND COVE NO LITTLE BROWN, RONNIE D. NLRHS-11/12 BROWN, SHARI L. BUS DRIVER 912 W 51 STREET NO LITTLE SPECIAL EDUCATION, DEPT. CHAIR ROCK AR ROCK AR AR ROCK AR *13/12 ROCK AR ROCK AR 834-5694 1212 KOEHLER SHERWOOD, AR LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION BRUMMETT, NETTIE S. 72118 72116 72116 72116 72116 72118 72116 758-4635 5805 WALNUT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 TURNING POINT COORDINATOR BRYANT, J. RONALD 753-6028 4201 HAZELWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY BAND DIRECTOR, DEPT. CHAIR BRYANT, RUTH M. 676-3403 CRESTWOOD BRYANT, RUTH M. RT. 2, BOX 191-A EARLY MORNING AIDE 676-3403 RT. 2, BOX 191-A CRESTWOOD THIRD YEAR BUCK, LEE ANNETTE 835-8266 107 RED RIVER AMBOY MEDIA SPECIALIST BUCKELEW, CYNTHIA L. 945-1911 125 MARVIN ST. REDWOOD SECOND YEAR BUIE, DANA D. ENGLAND AR 72046 ENGLAND AR 72046 SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 945-4367 108 COMPTON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL 9 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION BULL, CHARLOTTE 835-6677 NLRHS-11 / 12 BUNN, GARY O. 664-6076 ROSE CITY BURKE, FAITH C. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT s. CITY ZIP 15 THRUSH RIVER CR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SPECIAL EDUCATION, STUDENT COUNCIL ADVISOR 2420 RIVERFRONT, #94 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 MATH 7/8, STUDENT COUNCIL, PRE-ALG., ALG. I 753-8672 4100 ROYAL OAK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION, DEPT. CHAIR. BURL, GREGORY E. 758-4674 #19 SILVER RIDGE COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11/12 SPECIAL EDUCATION, ATHLETICS, DEPT. CHAIR BURL, GREGORY E. 758-4674 #19 SILVER RIDGE COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BUS DRIVER BURNETT, JACKIE E. 851-1290 1120 LYRIC LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY PERSONAL LIVING SKILLS/CO BURNETT, JUDY C. 791-2558 3800 FOX HILL RD. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 CRESTWOOD FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS BURNETT, SCHARMEL R. 225-7290 10224 CHARTERHOUSE LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR-INFO. SERVICES BURNS, L. LUANNE 753-3559 126 LEE ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 INDIAN HILLS PARAPROFESSIONAL BURNS, VALDA JEAN 758-5803 1121 WATERSIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BELWOOD SECRETARY BURRALL, SHARON S. 753-3485 4916 PIKE AVENUE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 RIDGEROAD CHORAL MUSIC BURRIS, KATHY A. 753-7296 5901 JFK BLVD, APT. 4003 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 PHYSICAL SCIENCE BURROW, SHIRLEY ANN 758-9136 5215 GLENMERE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY SECRETARY BURTON, BETTY JEAN 945-2985 919 'I' STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MEADOWP ARK FOOD SERVICE MANAGER BURTON, CORNELIUS L. 945-3675 905 'I' ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 WAREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR-STADIUM ATTND BURTON, CORNELIUS L. 945-3675 905 \"I\" ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SECURITY MONITOR BURTON, M. LYNN 835-1336 109 ILLINOIS BAYOU SHERWOODA R 72116 AMBOY THIRD/FOURTH YEARS 10 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION BUSH, NEDRA A. 753-2384 NLRHS-11 / 12 BUTCHER, THOMAS 888-1746 CENTRAL ELEM ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 1912 CRUTCHER CITY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 21115 MAPLE CREEK RD SPECIAL EDUCATION BUTLER, BRENDA SUE 568-5254 10529 DIAMOND DR NLRHS-11/12 MR/LD RESOURCE BUTLER, DEBRA L. 834-3863 127 SPRINGOAK DR RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION BUTTS, CAROL A. 988-1595 3009 CAROLYN DR LYNCH DRIVE FIRST YEAR BYNUM, DEEDRA L. 945-7530 220 EAST 47TH NORTH HEIGHTS MR/LD RESOURCE BYNUM, MABLE W. 945-7530 220 E. 47TH ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK, A HENSLEY AR LITTLE ROCK AR SHERWOODA R CABOT AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPT. - DESEGREGATION BYRD, ROXIE LEE 72114 72065 72209 72120 72023 72117 72117 945-4418 419 GLYNN LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NORTH HEIGHTS LEAD CUSTODIAN CALDWELL, DEBRA M. 758-3549 600 WEST 35TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CALDWELL, VALERIE D. 225-5434 12410 TIMBER BEND DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 NLRHS-11/12 SPECIAL EDUCATION CALLAHAN, DORIS A. 835-8453 #4 DOVE CREEK CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY ELEM COUNSELOR *47(.50)/32(.50) CALLAWAY, DEXTER D. 375-5554 2216 CHESTER LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NLRHS-09/10 CUSTODIAN CALVER, GAYLE A. 227-4593 12824 MORRISON RD. LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 ROSE CITY SPECIAL EDUCATION, DEPT CHAIR CALVIN, JONATHAN D. 371-0092 613 WALNUT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ROSE CITY LIFE SCIENCE CAMERON, ANITA K. 753-5466 134 SHERIDAN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 CCE COORDINATOR, ACT. DIRECTOR CAMMACK, LOUISE W. 753-3965 P.O. BOX 4456 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 AMERICAN HISTORY, AMERICAN GOVT/ECON CAMP, DREW C. 663-4706 710 N. PALM LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 ADMN. OFFICE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINER 11 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CAMPBELL, MURIELENE 753-2618 3501 FLORA ADMN. OFFICE GENERAL BOOKKEEPER CAMPBELL, RUBY A. CITY 758-1623 2000 PARKWAY, APT #307 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL CAMPBELL, SANDRA K. 753-7705 3600 ROYAL OAK DR NLRHS-11/12 NURSE CARDILLO, CARISSA L. 834-8320 9901 BROCKINGTON RD G-21 GLENVIEW FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS CAREY, BERNADETTE 371-0092 613 WALNUT NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CARMICAL, PHYLLIS A. 753-7189 5512 NO ALLEN INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CARR, KENNETH N. 557-2830 23050 GRAVEL RIDGE RD WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS MONITOR CARR, PATRICIA V. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 MABELVALE AR 72103 565-0106 10414 INDEPENDENCE LN LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 LAKEWOODM IDDLE CHD DEV/PAR, PERS. LIVING SKILLS CARROLL, JOAN D. 843-8913 10 SEVEN POINT LANE CABOT AR 72023 NLRHS-09/10 HOME EC. I, FAMILY DYNAMICS CARROLL, VICKI L. 945-1807 321 CHERYL ST. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 MEADOWP ARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CARTER, KAREN M. 375-3360 BLDG, #4, APT 40 SHORTER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER CARTER, PAMELA R. 758-6934 2102 MAPLE, APT B NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PARK HILL LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CASEY, JACK W. 753-3056 1013 W. 48TH, APT B NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY BOY'S P.E., ATHLETICS CASEY, RITA K. 758-1761 5621 WESTVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BUS DRIVER CASEY, RITA K. 758-1761 5621 WESTVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION CASEY, SARA J. 225-5250 11101 BIRCHWOOD DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODM IDDLE MATH 8, ALGEBRA, PRE-ALG. CASTEEL, HELEN M. 354-4033 301 SO. CHESTNUT MORRILTON AR 72110 NLRHS-11/12 ALGEBRA II, GEOM. 12 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION CAUSEY, SUSAN J. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 9403 DORSEY RD CITY ROSE CITY ELEM SPEECH THERAPIST *47/33 CHADWICK, DANA G. ZIP JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 758-0723 3801 LAKESHORE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION CHAMBERS, DEANE 835-3886 ADMN. OFFICE CHAMBERS, DEANE 835-3886 716 W KIEHL SECRETARY 716 W. KIEHL BUS DRIVER CHAMBERS, ROBBI S. 758-9616 4207 LOCHRIDGE RD LYNCH DRIVE KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR CHANCELLOR, LINDA J. 227-5026 1801 RESERVOIR RD #308 REDWOOD PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY CHANDLER, BEULAH 25 SILVER CITY COURTS BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CHANDLER, KELLIE. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 224-6084 11716 PLEASANT RDGE Al901 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 PARK HILL THIRD YEAR CHANDLER, RUTH L. 375-5654 1009 HIGH SEVENTH STREET READING RECOVERY CHAPMAN, NORA L. 4704 LYNN LANE, APT. D LAKEWOODE LEM FOOD SERVICE MANAGER CHENAULT, SHEILA S. 753-7559 4916 CANDLEWICK BOONE PARK PER-SCHOOL CENTER AIDE CLARK, ANGELIA C. 758-2483 15 THERESA DRIVE INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CLARK, DELOIS J. 375-7218 P.O. BOX 5872 NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 2605 W. 58TH FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO. LITTLE ROCK\n72118 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72119 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CLARK, EDITH M. 758-3544 NLRHS-09/10 CLARK, LYNNE E. 3674 \"H\", MCCAIN PARK DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MEADOWP ARK FIFTH YEAR CLARK, ROBERT L. 753-6632 5901 JFK, APT 2022 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CLEMANS, KATHRYN A. 835-5244 1813 OSCEOLA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET FIFTH YEAR 13 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY CLEMONS, PEGGY 753-5206 NLRHS-09/10 CLINTON, RUTH 753-0501 RIDGEROAD J. COATS, ANGELA 791-0236 GLENVIEW COBLE, RUBY J L. K. #77 KINGS RIVER RD GEOM, INT. ALG. 422 W 52ND MEDIA SPECIALIST 2020 VIRGINIA DR FOURTH YEAR 834-7663 1213 KOEHLER ATHLETIC OFFICE SECRETARY COBURN, DARLA KAY 834-0039 101 WILLOW GROVE CT INDIAN HILLS SIXTH YEAR COCHRAN, THERESA L. 758-7920 5706 DEL PRADO ST ADMN. OFFICE BOOKKEEPER COHEN, PERRY I. 666-0113 2519 NO. PIERCE ROSE CITY EARLY MORNING AIDE COHEN, PERRY I. 666-0113 2519 NORTH PIERCE ROSE CITY COLEMAN, ROSIE A. CO, EITE 374-5001 1859 SO PULASKI ROSE CITY ELEM EARLY MORNING AIDE COLEMAN, ROSIE A. 374-5001 1859 SOUTH PULASKI ROSE CITY ELEM MR/LO RESOURCE COLEMAN, YVONNE 945-6001 704 PARKDALE ROSE CITY HEAD CUSTODIAN COLLIE, JACKIE L. 988-2303 7218 WEST REPUBLICAN RD WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE CARPENTER COLLIE, MICHAEL D. 835-3126 9109 SYLVAN HILLS HWY h'AREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR FOREMAN COLLIE, SUSAN R. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOOD, AR 72116 SHERWOODA R 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 SHERWOODA R 72120 835-6448 2301 OZARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CRESTWOOD COMPUTER LAB AIDE - CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .50 COLLIER, JONNIE 227-5795 2903 DORSET NLRHS-11/12 CCE COORDINATOR COLLIER, TAMMY L. 835-5510 2505 OZARK INDIAN HILLS FIRST YEAR COLLINS, SANDRA K. 758-5564 1205 LAKESHORE,.PL ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, DIRECTOR 14 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OF PERSONNEL NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION CONDRAY, GEORGE 753-5370 NLRHS-09/10 CONDRAY, GLYNNA ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT H. 6204 EASTRIDGE DR ALG I, INT. ALG. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 753-5370 NLRHS-09/10 CONKLIN, EUNICE 834-7603 6204 EASTRIDGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 KEY BOARDING, REC. KEEPING, CIVICS PARK HILL CONLEY, KATRINA AMBOY COOK, KATHY L. 945-1446 ROSE CITY COOKSEY, RUBY J. J. 1611 MANOR DR. FOOD SERVICE MANAGER L. 2600 JOHN ASHLEY DR G-102 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 5500 LYNCH DR. PRINCIPAL-SECONDARY 945-7773 PROTHO MANOR APT. #24 BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE COOKSEY, TAMMIE R. 374-1609 1300 E POPLAR CENTRAL ELEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT COONEY, EDWARD 372-2727 LAKEWOODE LEM COPELAND, ELTON 909 E. 13TH CROSSING GUARD 835-0069 RT 3, 118B, BOX 67 NLRHS-11/12 CUSTODIAN  COPELAND, JAIRUS L. NLRHS-09/10 COPELAND, JOE B. 10 CARDINAL VALLEY DR BOYS' P.E. I, ATHLETICS 753-4669 5021 OAKLAWN WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER COPELAND, KATHY S. SHERWOOD, AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 *13/12, SOCCER NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 758-1967 4609 MARION CAFE. OFFICE OFFICE SECRETARY-FOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SERVICES CORNWELL, DEBRA 851-3969 55 STONELEDGE DR MAUMELLE, AR 72113 CENTRAL ELEM SPEECH THERAPIST/MR/LO CORROTHERS, DONNA M. 945-5018 5107 GLENVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 INDIAN HILLS SECOND YEAR COTTRELL, MELISSA L. 225-1969 7802 EVERGREEN LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN COUCH, BEVERLY JO 758-1857 314 W 20TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT COULTER, S. PAIGE 1912 CLAPBOARD HILL LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 MEADOWP ARK FIRST YEAR 15 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT COUSINS, ELIZABETH H. 223-8040 . 1819 FOREMAN DR. CITY CENTRAL ELEM G/T *38(.60)/32(.40) COWART, ANN MARIE NLRHS-11/12 COY, EARLINE E. 945-4343 CRANE, MAXINE 59 KINGS RIVER RD AMERICAN HISTORY 139 SAUNDERS DR. BUS DRIVER ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 771-4943 1908 MAGNOLIA NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CRAWFORD, ESTHER C. 758-2090 5901 J.F.K. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARYE DUCATION CRESSWELL, RAYMONDD . 776-1075 1722 NO HWY2 29 TRASKWOODA R 72167 MECHANIC CREWS, VERNELLE 835-9636 1411 SILVER CREEK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GLENVIEW SECOND YEAR CRITES, DIANE 758-8738 5788 CACHE RIVER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY CRITSELOUS, PAULA K. 663-2721 1411 CHERRY BROOK DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 BARING CROSS SPEECH THERAPY CROSS, BARBARA J. 376-1230 1409 PINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ADMN. OFFICE EVEN START PARAPROFESSIONAL CROSS, LYNDA JEAN 982-8819 110 PINEHURST COVE JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 PIKE VIEW SECOND/THIRD YEARS CROSS, SHEILA ANN 758-3167 5105 WALNUT, APT. E NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT CROWNOVER, ALAND. 961-2920 P.O. BOX 17172 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR OF PLANT SERVICES CROWNOVER, JEAN P. 961-2920 P.O. BOX 17172 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SEVENTH STREET SECRETARY CRUMBY, JEAN A. 758-2968 NLRHS-09/10 CRUMPLER, CLAIR 329-0943 MEADOWP ARK 21 SOMERSET DR NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 FRENCH I, II J. #5 OVERLOOKT RAIL CONWAYA R 72032 COUNSELOR *40(.55)/30(.35)/32(.10) CRYMES, MARILYN H. 835-3887 7009 FLINTROCK RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 ENGLISH II 16 - NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CULBERSON, ALICE L. 753-1897 809 W. 21ST BUS DRIVER CULPEPPER, BARBARA I. 851-3882 9901 BROCKINGTON J-21 INDIAN HILLS SIXTH YEAR CUMMINGS, L. CHARLENE 835-6357 103 MARKHAVEN LAKEWOODE LEM MEDIA CLERK *32/42 CUNNINGHAM, ROBIN LYNN 753-5309 3744 LOCH LANE BELWOOD FIRST/SECOND YEARS CURRY, JERRY R. 843-7811 27 SUMMIT WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE PLUMBER DACE, JUDY F. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 SHERWOODA R 72120 SHERWOOD AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CABOT AR 72023 327-1011 49 DACE PL. CONWAY, AR 72032 LAKEWOODM IDDLE CAREER ORIENTATION, DEPT. CHAIR. DAILEY, WILLIAM 372-3690 P.O. BOX 2004 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 DALE, JOANN 758-0842 ALT CENTER DALTON, LEWIS 771-29 30 BELWOOD o. BUS DRIVER 824 W. 51ST K-6 TEACHER P.O. BOX 1621 LEAD CUSTODIAN DANAHER, KEVIN H. 771-0335 901 E. 53RD PL NLRHS-09/10 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL-SEC DANAHER, NITA K. 771-0335 901 E. 53RD PL. CENTRAL ELEM PRE-SCHOOL CENTER AIDE DANIELS, GREGORY N. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 227-6018 910 GREEN MTN. DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR COMPUTER SERVICES DANIELS, PEGGY 753-8143 NLRHS-11/12 DARBY, RANDA E. 834-3118 NLRHS-09/10 DARLING, MARY B. 819 W 42ND SECRETARY P. O. BOX 4267 COUNSELOR 835-2217 6520 CORSICA ROSE CITY MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA DAVIDSON, JERRY D. 945-3376 118 BLENDEN DR. NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT DAVIS, BETTIE L. 753-8592 508 WISTERIA DR. MEADOWP ARK FIRST YEAR 17 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION DAVIS, BRENDA 375-7662 J. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 1509 SYCAMORE CITY CAFE. OFFICE DAVIS, DANNA 224-0549 RIDGEROAD DAVIS, DEBRA J. FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 771-0864 PIKE VIEW DAVIS, GARY LEE 834-3369 DAVIS, GARY LEE #5 DEL RAY CCVE 7, CCVE 8 6605 RUSTIC LN LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 3514 HOLLMORE #5 BUS DRIVER 834-3369 3514 HOLLMORE #5 ALT CENTER ATHLETICS, BASEBALL DAVIS, I. JAN ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOODA R 72120 SHERWOODA R 72120 375-1321 1310 N FRANT ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL DAVIS, JUDY F. 758-0651 5400 N. WALNUT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODE LEM SECOND YEAR DAVIS, KATHY L. 758-3407 5309 NO. LOCUST NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 PIKE VIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE DAVIS, LEON B. 753-8592 508 WISTERIA DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOODM IDDLE GEOGRAPHY,A M. HISTORY DAVIS, MONICA D. 835-2904 130 WHITEWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NLRHS-11/12 EARTH SCIENCE, ECOLOGY, BIOLOGY DAVIS, ONEADER 945-5235 2509 LANSBROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER DAVIS, ROY L. 843-6644 P.O. BOX 474 CABOT AR 72023 INDIAN HILLS CUSTODIAN DAVIS, SHERRY H. 329-2422 #2 WOODSIDED R 1-D CONWAYA R 72032 GLENVIEW KINDERGARTEN DAVIS, VETRICE L. 562-8059 8701 I-30, APT. 228 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 ALT CENTER CROSSING GUARD DAVIS, VONDA K. 945-5427 2203 E WASHINGTON AVE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 BUS DRIVER DAWSON, CORNELIUS W. 534-7234 2709 CLAREMONT PINE BLUFF AR 71601 RIDGEROAD MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA 8 DAY, PATRICIA A. 945-0958 2600 E. WASHINGTON AVE. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BELWOOD FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 18 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION DEAL, DIANNA J. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 771-4565 . 4705 WEST STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW FOURTH YEAR DEATON, SARILEA 851-7908 #10 TARA COVE MAUMELLE, AR EARLY CHILDHOOD - SPECIAL EDUCATION ANN 72113 ADMN. OFFICE DEJESUS, CINDY 771-4817 4413 WEST DR. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 ADMN. OFFICE DELONEY, HAZEL B. SECRETARY-EARLY CHILDHOOD 2104 HUNTER RD NLRHS-09/10 DENNIS, JAMESETTA CIVICS, WORLD PROB. 664-9386 1700 N. HUGHES #14 BOONE PARK COMPUTER LAB AIDE - DENT, BETTY ANN 851-2620 NLRHS-09/10 DERDEN, ROBERT 835-5821 NLRHS-09/10 DERRICK, ANITA 753-2261 INDIAN HILLS DERRICK, ANITA 753-2261 20 PINE FOREST DRIVE KEY BOARDING, ACCT. c. 12 SALLISAW CIRCLE BAND DIRECTOR *12/25 E. 209 W. MILITARY DR EARLY MORNING AIDE E. INDIAN HILLS DESHLER, NONA L. 209 W. MILITARY DR FIFTH YEAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .50 MAUMELLE AR 72113 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 228-0899 13500 CHENAL PKWY. #350B LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 AMBOY FIFTH YEAR DETTOR, OLIVETTE C. 666-9077 1601 N BRYANT, #38 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEVORE, RHONDA L. 758-6633 1000 REGAL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW KINDERGARTEN DICKERSON, BOBBIE J. 945-7859 215 MOSLEY ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 GLENVIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE DICKERSON, TINA R. 372-4105 800 N BEECH,BLDG.4,APT 33 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER DICKSON, FLORENCE JANE 851-4109 5 SUGARLOAF LOOP LAKEWOODM IDDLE LIFE/EARTH SCIENCE DIFFY, DEBRA K. 758-3449 CENTRAL ELEM DILLARD, SHERMON 5206 PIKE AVE THIRD YEAR MAUMELLE AR 72113 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-5901 3900 MCCAIN PK,BLD#8, 242 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSE ASSISTANT, FOOD SERVICE 19 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY DILLINGER, 225-6147 RELLIA A. ADMN. OFFICE DILLON, DARLENE 13121 MORRISON RD. LITTLE ROCK AR SUPERVISOR - SPECIAL EDUCATION ZIP 72212 753-5212 201 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 INDIAN HILLS DINGLER, DIANE J. COMPUTER LAB AIDE - CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .50 834-5563 310 FORK RIVER RD. SHERWOODA R 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS SIXTH YEAR DIPIETRO, LOUISE M. 758-3884 5815 GREENHURST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODE LEM FIRST YEAR DIRDEN, ROSE LEE 375-1329 216 BARTON LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 REDWOOD ELEMENTARYC OUNSELOR* 49(.55)/45(.40)/46(.05) DISON, MANUEL SR. 945-3220 2301 E. 2ND ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET CROSSING GUARD DIXON, ANNIE P. 945-5234 6414 HOLMAN LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE MANAGER DIXON, GENEVA M. 945-4046 6413 HOLMAN LANE NO LITTLE ROCK ROSE CITY ELEM COMPUTER LAB AIDE *47(.70) 11(.30) DOKES, JOCELYN 374-0981 1217 E 15 ST NO LITTLE LYNCH DRIVE PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE DOKES, VERONICA L. 565-3713 PO BOX 5404 NORTH HEIGHTS CHAPTER I KINDERGARTEN DOMBROSKI, TERRI R. 758-4372 BELWOOD DONAHUE, ANITA 753-4943 RIDGEROAD DOREY, WILLIAM 834-1586 WAREHOUSE DOSS, LISA B. 2504 S BERKLEY FOURTH YEAR 10016 NATURAL TRAIL FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT L. 2521 MCCALLUMD R. LEAD HEATING \u0026amp; AC NO LITTLE AIDE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE ROCK ROCK ROCK ROCK ROCK AR AR AR AR AR AR 988-1996 NLRHS-11 / 12 DOTSON, JIMMIE 568-8119 RIDGEROAD 7617 BATESVILLE PIKE JACKSONVILLE AR BAND 10, BAND ASST. 11/12 *12/24 s. 6824 CAROLINA DR SPECIAL EDUCATION DOUGLASS, MAURI T. LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 72114 72119 72118 72113 72116 72076 72209 834-2043 1721 OKMULGEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BOONE PARK GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE *33(.60)/47(.40) DOWNING, EULIN C. 982-2266 RT 1, BOX 103 . JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NLRHS-11/12 AUTO SHOP I,II 20 NAME. TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT DREHER, BILLIE ANN CITY ZIP 835-6007 1718 WEWOKA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE ART DUDLEY, BARBARA L. 835-6757 100 OVERCUP SHERWOODA R 72120 LAKEWOODM IDDLE MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA 8, DEPT. CHAIR. DUGAS, MARTHA L. 835-0126 9004 PATRICIA LYNN LANE SHERWOODA R 72120 PARK HILL MR/LD RESOURCE *43(.80) 32(.20) DUKE, STEPHEN 329-7231 10 SYLVIA RD. CONWAYA R 72032 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION DUMAS, SHARON D. 758-6157 4925 LONGVIEW DRIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE DUNN, SHERRY M. 758-2693 6404 ALLWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CENTRAL ELEM MEDIA SPECIALIST DUPRIEST, JOHNNIE A. 758-4492 1400 W LONG 17TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SECRETARY DUPRIEST, JOHNNIE A. 375-9303 1400 W LONG 17 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER DURNAL, CYNTHIA A. 397-7143 7005 GUM RD HENSLEY AR 72065 BUS DRIVER DUVALL, BILLY C. 758-8621 145 AUBURN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN DYER, A. LORENE 329-5310 2700 NUTTER CHAPEL RD CONWAY AR 72032 ROSE CITY READING DYER, JIM 666-7934 4816 CRESTWOODD R LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR - INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES EARNHART, BETTY N. 753-1838 901 W 50TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CENTRAL ELEM CHAPTER I AIDE EAST, MARY CAROLYN 224-1589 89 KINGSPARK ROAD LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 SEVENTH STREET GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE*35(.7) 37(.3) EDMONDS, JUNE M. 227-0830 2914 CHARTER OAK LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 PIKE VIEW THIRD YEAR EDMONDS, WILLARD J. 982-1959 428 NO. OAK JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LAKEWOODM IDDLE HEAD CUSTODIAN EDOGUN, PATRICIA G. 374-0907 P.O. BOX 5964 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72119 REDWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 21 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT EDOGUN, PATRICIA S. CITY ZIP 374-0907 P.O. BOX 5964 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72119 REDWOOD CROSSING GUARD EDRINGTON, JODY L. 227-8411 320B NEBLING RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 CENTRAL ELEM PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAM EGGENSPERGER, TAMI G. 771-5044 3413 SEVIER DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY KINDERGARTEN ELDRED, SHARON L. 221-1641 #8 CHRISTOPHER COVE LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 BOONE PARK MR/LD RESOURCE ELLIOTT, BARBARA J. 771-1502 1012 TALIHANA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CAFE. OFFICE OFFICE SECRETARY-FOOD SERVICES ELLIOTT, DONNA E. 753-7044 4700 VINE ST NO LITTLE ROCK A 72116 RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION, PEP CLUB SPONSOR ELLIOTT, LINDA KAY 835-6925 704 GROSVENOR SHERWOOD, AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM FIFTH YEAR EMANUEL, MARY ANN 666-3999 2400 RIVERFRONT DR A-2621 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 ROSE CITY GEOGRAPHY/AMERICANH ISTORY ERVIN, MARGARET A. 753-6302 17 FOX DEN CT. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET KINDERGARTEN ESKRIDGE, ROSEMARY 375-0078 124 NO. HAZEL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BELWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE ESKRIDGE, ROSEMARY 375-0076 124 NO HAZEL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BELWOOD PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE EVANS, BARBARA 771-4551 6613 RUSTIC LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY ELEM CHAPTER I AIDE EVANS, DEBORAH R. 834-4242 32 DONNELL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 SEVENTH STREET SIXTH YEAR EVANS, EDWINA A. 945-4662 211 MOSLEY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 AMBOY LUNCH PERIOD AIDE EVANS, MARY B. 224-1042 8516 LA BETTE DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LYNCH DRIVE SIXTH YEAR EVANS, MICHELLE w. 835-0368 1205 CORNFLOWER SHERWOODA R 72116 AMBOY FIRST YEAR EWART, KAY T. 753-0846 37 OAK TREE CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 ALG. II, GEOMETRY, SR. CABINET CHAIR. 22 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT L. CITY ZIP FALLIS, CHERYL 758-4162 NLRHS-11/ 12 FARMER, LEE M. 501 LINDENHURST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PRE-CALCULUS, GEOMETRY, CALCULUS 663-6029 1924 PINE VALLEY RD. LYNCH DRIVE SECOND YEAR FARZLEY, FRANCES A. 758-7011 4516 AUSTIN DRIVE LAKEWOODM IDDLE ENGLISH 8 FAULK, MARTHA J. 771-0494 4008 MT VERNON LAKEWOODM IDDLE B.A. AIDE FELTON, LINDA L. 771-4296 3500 GUM BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FENDLEY, SUSAN C. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-1452 4525 SOMERS AVENUE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE GIFTED - ENGLISH 7,8, DEPT. CHAIR. FERGUSON, MARY LOU 666-5769 3700 CANTRELL RD #406 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NORTH HEIGHTS GIFTED/TALENTED *41(.70)/46(.30) FERGUSON, PAMALA ANN 11222 KANIS LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION, CHEERLEADING, PEP CLUB FEWELL, MARTHA J. 771-1275 1913 MILL CREEK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY NURSE FINN, BRENDA V. 834-2114 RIDGEROAD 117 WHITEWOOD DR. SHERWOOD AR 72120 KEY BOARDING, C.O., ENG 7, DEPT CHAIRPERSON 4811 SYCAMORE PHYSICAL SCIENCE FLAKE, R. LARRY 758-9244 NLRHS-09/10 FLEMING, ALICE A. 758-1912 2209 MIDDLETON LAKEWOODM IDDLE AMERICAN HISTORY FLORES, HESTER M. P.O. BOX 17136 BUS DRIVER FOLEY, CHRISTOPHER 228-6119 701 GREEN MTN DR #1403 NLRHS-09/10 BAND/ELEMENTARYM USIC FOOTS, THELMA 945-5148 REDWOOD FORD, MARTHA J. 835-5591 AMBOY 801 'E' ST, DIXIE ADD LEAD CUSTODIAN 26 CORONADO PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY FORD, MIRIAM SMITH 375-0544 2422 GAINES MEADOWP ARK FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS 23 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION FORSTER, NANCY ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 666-1168 5326 SHERWOODR D ALT CENTER DRUG ED COUNSELOR FORT, LAURA K. 227-7091 #8 OHIO COVE AMBOY KINDERGARTEN FORTNER, LYNN L. 835-9622 7505 GERONIMO CR. INDIAN HILLS CHAPTER I AIDE FORTNER, SUE 753-8926 6612 GREENBANK PIKE VIEW COMPUTER LAB AIDE FOSSUM, KIM K. 225-7191 68 SUMMIT RIDGE CT. AMBOY FOURTH YEAR FOSTER, JANET L. 851-6814 35 EDGEHILL COVE CITY ADMN. OFFICE EARLY CHILDHOOD-SPECIAL FOWLER, MATTHEWO . 778-0305 3203 S. BEGGS. RD. WAREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR LEADER FOWLER, ROBBIE M. 985-2866 SAS SIMMONS #41 M HOWELL GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FOWLER, SHIRLEY A. 753-3606 134 EASTGATE TERRACE PARK HILL LUNCH PERIOD AIDE FOWLKES, ELIZABETH A. 758-0703 4001 ORANGE ST CENTRAL ELEM SECOND YEAR FRAZIER, BRENDA J. 945-7584 #10 GOODWIN CIRCLE PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FREEMAN, SHIRLEY M. 758-1602 710 NO \"M\", #101 LAKEWOODE LEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FRIEDRICH, DOLLY J. 758-3037 301 E 18TH LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FROST, PATRICIA A. 945-3686 6616 FARMSTEAD RD. REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FULLER, AUDREY W. ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 MAUMELLEA R 72113 EDUCATION BENTON AR 72015 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 753-8509 6301 CMP ROBINSON RD 242F NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET SECOND YEAR FULLER, LINDA S. 753-4639 4004 GLENMERE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 GUIDANCE COUNSELOR, DEPT. CHAIRPERSON FULMER, KENNETH R. 945-2815 729 HEALY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NLRHS-09/10 MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAN 24 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION FULMER, MARY M. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 758-6891 809 W. 25TH NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 CRESTWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT FULTON, ELIZABETH H. 663-9380 6600 HAWTHORNE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 NLRHS-11/12 BIOLOGY, ZOOLOGY, AP BIOLOGY, DEPT. CHAIR. FURLOUGH, LORETTA J. 455-6251 9920 GODWIN DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 BOONE PARK SIXTH YEAR FUSELIER, ANITA K. 835-8722 110 MARKHAVEN SHERWOODA R 72120 CRESTWOOD SECOND YEAR GAINES, REGINA B. 945-4452 4608 ATKINS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL GAMBLE, NORA JEAN 376-2847 3123 ARCH LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 REDWOOD FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS GARDNER, REBECCA W. 758-2996 6313 ROLLING HILLS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL *31/41 GARRETT, CAROLYN FAE 329-2329 1301. COLLIER DR CONWAYA R 72032 ROSE CITY SPECIAL EDUCATION GARRETT, GERALDINE 375-3959 1801 VANCE LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NLRHS-11/12 HOME ECONOMICS I, CLOTHING, C.D. GARRETT, SARAH M. 470-0982 27 PARADISE CR, BOX 91M MAYFLOWERA R 72106 BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE GARRETT, SARAH M. 470-0982 27 PARADISE CR, BOX 91M MAYLFOWERA R 72106 BOONE PARK EARLY MORNING AIDE GARRISON, JANET 221-1874 4 REGAL CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ROSE CITY BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT GARRISON, REBECCA V. 758-8028 605 WESTFIELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 MEADOWP ARK MEDIA CLERK *40/46 GARRISON, STEVEN D. 758-8028 605 WESTFIELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOODM IDDLE EITE 7/8 GARVIN, WILLIAM E. 982-2661 P.O. BOX 1135 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 NLRHS-11/12 ENGLISH IV GARY, RAYMOND 945-2850 2506 E. 2ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MECHANIC HELPER GATES, CARROLL L. 372-4340 506 WATER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY CUSTODIAN 25 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION GATES, JUDIE A. NLRHS-09/10 GATES, JUDY F. 835-1682 ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 8301 WOODVIEWW EST SECRETARY 7618 TOMAHAWDKR AMBOY READING RECOVERY GATEWOOD, ADA 376-8863 REDWOOD GATEWOOD, ADA LEE 2501 BATTERY SECOND YEAR LEE 376-8863 REDWOOD GIBBS, BETTY A. 945-5844 MEADOWP ARK GIBSON, CECIL R. 2501 BATTERY EARLY MORNING AIDE 6316 HOLMAN LANE COMPUTER LAB AIDE 375-8964 1109 PARK DR. MEADOWP ARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE GILBERT, RHONDA F. 758-8301 1708 N OLIVE CENTRAL ELEM CHAPTER I AIDE GILKEY, BARBARA J. CITY ZIP SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 562-4162 P.O. BOX 164316 LITTLE ROCK AR 72216 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY COORDINATOR/SOCIAL WORKER GILLESPIE, BEVERLY I. 371-9900 905 E 16TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MEADOWP ARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT GILLISON, SARAF. 228-6908 67 LEFEVER LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN GILMORE, FREDERICK D. 753-5222 1901 W. 20TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ALT CENTER TEACHER AIDE GIMBLET, ELAINE M. 753-0840 4800 N CYPRESS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 CIVICS GLADWIN, MARLA JO 771-0315 224 DOOLEY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARYC OUNSELOR GLASS, THELMA J. 771-0359 5618 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE MANAGER GLOVER, PAMELA D. 753-3136 5912 MEADOWBROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE SECRETARY-FOOD SERVICES GLOVER, WILLIAM R. WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER GOLDSBY, OPAL J. 753-6022 412 W 21ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM THIRD YEAR 26 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT GOSS, FRANCENE S. CITY ZIP 753-4173 3101 OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 FOUND. IN ART, DWG. I, II, VR \u0026amp; 10TH DRILL TEAM GOSS, GARY F. 753-4173 3101 OLIVE ATHLETIC OFFICE DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS GRANDERSON, JANET L. 834-1169 108 CEDARWOOD LAKEWOODM IDDLE BAND DIRECTOR GRAVETTE, RICKS. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOODA R 72120 221-2136 216 W PINE LONOKE AR 72086 NLRHS-11/12 ART, DES. I, II, 3-D SCU GRAY, JIMMIED. 835-1364 1200 DYSON DR. SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-09/10 PSYCHOLOGY, STUDENT COUNCIL CHAIR GRAYSTON, LARHONDAJ . 329-7357 8A W. CADRON RDGE. RD. RIDGEROAD COUNSELOR GREEN, KAY 835-0210 CENTRAL ELEM GREEN, LUTHER 945-0402 INDIAN HILLS GREEN, NANCY C. 7300 COMANCHE COMPUTER LAB AIDE 1509 BEN STREET LEAD CUSTODIAN GREENBRIER, AR 72058 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 834-3952 REDWOOD 122 AUDUBON COVE \"C\" NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 SPEECH THERAPIST *49(.50) 42(.50) GREENWAY, PATRINA NLRHS-11/12 FRENCH I,II,III,IV, AM. GREENWOOD, KRISTEN LEIGH 753-0651 5637 APPLEWOOD DR AMBOY THIRD YEAR GRIFFITH, STEPHANIE 834-1750 112 ROBINGLEN REDWOOD KINDERGARTEN GRIFFO, LARRY L. 376-2544 1868 IZARD STREET ALT CENTER KEY BOARDING GRISSOM, KIMBERLY D. 758-2779 5900 GREEN VALLEY NORTH HEIGHTS FIRST YEAR GRUBBS, JACKIE A. 753-1126 1522 WEST 36TH BELWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT GUNDAKER, LINDA A. 843-9143 RT. 1, BOX 102A GLENVIEW SECOND/THIRD YEAR GUNN, MARY H. HISTORY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 SHERWOODA R 72120 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AUSTIN, AR 72007 372-7767 302 E. 13TH NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 27 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT HALE, NORA M. 753-7959 4200 W. MOSS NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HALL, CHERYLL. 834-7589 6013 ELK RIVER RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS SPEECH THERAPIST HALL, DONNA K. 834-0328 124 ALMONDC OVE SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-09/10 TECH. THEATER I,II HALL, LAURA C. 1605 OSAGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 JOURN., CR. WRITING, N.P. AVD./LIT. MAG ADV HALLMAN, KELLIE 374-6210 1622 SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HAMILTON, ANNIE W. 372-2769 823 PINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 BUS. LAW, RECORD KEEPING,KEYBOARDING HAMILTON, SHANNON E. 225-0466 911 N SHACKLEFORD RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODM IDDLE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR HAMPTON, CYNTHIA 664-2832 1305 SOUTH CLEVELAND LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NLRHS-11/12 KEYBORADING, COMP TECH, WORD PROCESS HAMPTON, JACQUELINE A. 376-2253 3123 GAINES STREET LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 GLENVIEW MEDIA SPECIALIST *46/40 HAMPTON, NORA LEE 375-7523 1714 S BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 ROSE CITY COUNSELOR HANDLE, THERESA L. 758-9813 4004 CAMP ROBINSON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE HARDCASTLE, MARGARET L. 758-2718 209 LATONA LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL SIXTH YEAR HARDER, MARILYN J. 758-5987 5140 LOCHRIDGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CAFE. OFFICE OFFICE SECRETARY-FOOD SERVICES HARDIN, JUDY A. 771-0947 2417 MOSS ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HARDISON, DEBORAH J. 834-0813 33 CORONADO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SPECIAL EDUCATION HARDY, REGINA R. 834-3915 6705 PONTIAC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR HARKENREADER, LYNDA K. 661-8709 6803 PETERS RD JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 BUS DRIVER 28 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT HARMON, CYNTHIA A. CITY ZIP 835-9318 1732 OSCEOLA DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE EARLY CHILDHOOD - SPEECH HARPER, JIMMY N. 758-0224 3300 LAKEVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 PARENT LAB/PCP TEACHER *12/13 HARPER, MILTON L. 513 WITTS DR SHERWOODA R 72120 INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HARRELL, CHARLES W., JR 834-1489 2316 BATESVILLE PIKE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NLRHS-11/12 CUSTODIAN HARRINGTON, DOROTHY J. 663-5992 2107 S. TAYLOR LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 BOONE PARK FIFTH YEAR HARRIS, ALEXANDRAR . 758-0705 3 HERITAGE PARK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CRESTWOOD SECOND YEAR HARRIS, ARTHUR, JR. 945-4655 5215 CHIQUITO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 REDWOOD CROSSING GUARD HARRIS, CHARLES JR. 835-4801 300 BEVERLY SHERWOODA R 72116 WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSEM AN/DELIVERY HARRIS, CHARLES JR. 835-4801 300 BEVERLY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 SECURITY MONITOR HARRIS, DONNETTA 771-4314 5601 PARKER ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HARRIS, JOE N. 771-2357 303 E 18TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM CROSSING GUARD HARRIS, KATHY L. 945-4062 709 BLOSSOM NO LITTLE ROCK -AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HARRIS, KATHY L. 945-4062 709 BLOSSOM NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE HARRIS, KATHY L. 945-4062 709 BLOSSOM NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM EARLY MORNING AIDE HARRIS, LILTON C. 376-7503 720 N. PINE ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER HARRIS, MARYL. 945-4655 5215 CHIQUITO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 GLENVIEW CROSSING GUARD HARRIS, NINA C. 753-2923 4536 SOMERS AVE ADMN. OFFICE HOMEBOUNDTE ACHER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 29 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT HARRIS, PATRICIA W. 664-4593 5121 W. 23RD RIDGEROAD ENGLISH 7 HARTL, ELSA MARIE 262-2566 161 WESTINGHOUSE LAKEWOODM IDDLE MATH HARTWICK, BARBARA J. 771-0451 1611 GROVE HILL BELWOOD THIRD/FOURTH YEARS HARVELL, LINDA M. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 HOT SPRINGS AR 71901 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 771-0953 3801 FOX HILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW FIFTH YEAR HASKELL, BARBARA J. 372-7101 800 N BEECH, BLDG 9, #129 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE HASSELL, LORETTA M. 758-8213 4508 AUSTIN DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEARS HATLEY, SANDRA M. 758-8491 205 WEST 47TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL HATLEY, SANDRA 758-8491 RIDGEROAD HAVER, GARY L. M. 205 W 47TH LUNCH PERIOD AIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 753-4187 19 OAK TREE CR NLRHS-11/12 MARKETING, MARKETING NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAB, GOLF HAWKINS, RUSSELL D. 374-1869 2000 SCHILLER LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 ALT CENTER PRINCIPAL-SECONDARY HAYNES, GAYLE D. 568-6041 5519 PECAN LAKE ROAD LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 RIDGEROAD LIFE SCIENCE HAYNIE, JOHN C. 868-4337 8012 GUENTHER RD ROLAND AR 72135 SUPERVISOR OF TRANSPORTATION HAYNIE, VICKIE 771-2129 CRESTWOOD HAYS, MARK A. L. 8306 PINE CANYON RD. SECRETARY 568-4499 4301 VINSON RD NLRHS-09/10 ATHLETICS, HEALTH HAZELWOOD, LINDA I. 753-3158 4600 VINE ST. NLRHS-09/10 PE, GIRLS COACH HEATHCOCK, REBECCA SUE 851-2154 7 YUKON COVE LAKEWOODE LEM SPEECH THERAPIST *32/43 HENDERSON-PRICE, PATRICIA 5817 PETIT JEAN RIVER RD PARK HILL CHAPTER I AIDE 30 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MAUMELLEA R 72113 SHERWOODA R 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT DONNA MARIE CITY ZIP HENDERSON, 758-2583 431 MCCAIN, HIGHCLIFF C32 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ATHLETICS, HEALTH, P.E. SUSAN ROSE CITY HENDERSON, LISA 327-1427 1815 TYLER APT 1 CONWAYA R 72032 ADMN. OFFICE HENRY, JIM D. 753-7604 EARLY CHILDHOOD - SPECIAL EDUCATION 5313 N. LOCUST MECHANIC J. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 HENSLEY, PAMELA 327-0299 ROSE CITY HENSLEY, SUSAN 791-0943 AMBOY 36 FRANCES DR ART, ENGLISH CONWAYA R 8, BEG. ART 8 72032 M. #4 NUGGET CR KINDERGARTEN L. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 5600 ALTA VISTA NO LITTLE ROCK HENSON, GUYANA 758-2309 LAKEWOODE LEM HENSON, SANDRA K. 72118 COMPUTER LAB AIDE, CHAPTER I /DISTRICT 851-2060 5 TREVINO DR. ROSE CITY ENGLISH 7 HERMAN, RUSTY 758-3518 126 E. 23RD WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER HERRICK, CAROLYN A. 843-2407 16 HUNT LN. ALT CENTER KINDERGARTEN THRU SIXTH HERRING, JOHN C. 753-2794 #60 OAKVIEW DR BUS DRIVER HERRON, CYNTHIA D. 562-8214 #33 HARROW HESS, CARMA L. 758-5701 NORTH HEIGHTS HIBBARD, JANICE 753-1080 BUS DRIVER 1700 GROVE HILL SECRETARY SUE 1925 TOPF RD ADMN. OFFICE MUSIC PROGRAM HIBBLEN, DORIS S. 835-5976 2609 OZARK DR TEACHER NLRHS-09/10 CIVICS, DEPT. CHAIR. HICKMAN, CHRISTINE 945-2709 5013 N WOODLAND ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PROGRAM ASSISTANT HICKMAN, DOROTHY F. 753-4220 5704 ALTA VISTA INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HICKS, MARYE. MAUMELLE, AR 72113 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 CABOT, AR 72203 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 753-3946 1613 CIRCLEDALE.. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 G/T FACILITATOR, ENGLISH II, DEPT. CHAIR 31 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY HIGGINS, ELFRIEDE A. 204 BLUEBELL DR. AMBOY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HILL, KIMBERLY P. 758-4013 405 WEST \"M\" ST NORTH HEIGHTS FIRST/SECOND YEARS HODGE, LORETTA 374-7915 2004 EAST 2ND STREET REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HODGES, TAMARA 834-1762 105 KING PINE RD BOONE PARK FIRST YEAR HOGAN, AMY D 666-6230 309 ROSETTA DR BOONE PARK FOURTH YEAR HOGAN, BETTY 758-9772 3800 MELLENE NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE MANAGER HOGAN, KATHLEEN 227-8048 8100 CANTRELL #1106 AMBOY KINDERGARTEN HOKE, CHARLOTTE R. 758-4131 510 WEST \"M\" ST. INDIAN HILLS MULTIPLE HANDICAPPED HOLDERFIELD, CATHY L. 758-1177 324 COLLEGE PARK DR ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOOD, AR 72120 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ADMN. OFFICE EVEN START PARAPROFESSIONAL HOLLAND, ANITA Z. 791-0398 31 OAKTREE CR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CRESTWOOD KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR HOLLAND, MARY R. 945-4703 3 QUILLEN CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE HOLLEY, KELLI J. 70 SOMERSET NORTH HEIGHTS HOLLEY, SCHULA M. LUNCH PERIOD NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 AIDE 664-4679 1415 SOUTH MARTIN LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 ALT CENTER SOCIAL STUDIES/ALTERNATIVE CENTER HOLLISTER, MARTHA 376-8379 1817 W 16TH BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HOLLISTER, MARTHA 376-8379 1817 W 16TH BOONE PARK CROSSING GUARD HOLLISTER, MARY J. 376-8379 1817 W 16 PARK HILL LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HOLLISTER, RAY 376-8379 250 MELROSE CR. ROSE CITY ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 32 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION HOLLISTER, RAY ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 562-5032 8701 I-30, APT 96 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 MECHANIC'S HELPER HOLLOWAY, ANGELA M. 375-5267 612 N. WALNUT NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HOLLOWAY, JIMMY R. 835-0245 24 WATERFRONT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 ADMN. OFFICE COMPUTER PROGRAMMER-OPERATOR HOLLOWAY, MARION 753-6006 1420 W. 36TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOODE LEM SECRETARY HOLMES, DARLENE V. 758-4463 1017 NICOLE DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 REDWOOD COMPUTER LAB AIDE *49(.50) 11(.50) HOLT, BRENDA S. 679-3299 BOX 61, #16 BOLDEN HILL GUY AR 72061 BARING CROSS SECRETARY HOLT, FRANKIE Y. 834-0197 #5 CUSTER PLACE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 SEVENTH STREET MEDIA SPECIALIST HOMAN, ROSETTA M. 835-4256 8904 WILHITE LANE SHERWOODA R 72120 CENTRAL ELEM FIRST YEAR HONORABLE, CONSTANCE L. 945-9482 122 MORNING GLORY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN HOPKINS, MYRNA GAIL 758-0526 1020 MCCAIN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 JOURNALISM, ENGLISH III,YEAR BOOK SPONSOR HOPPER, JACQUELINE M. 758-6319 6301 CAMP ROBINSON H-109 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET COUNSELOR *35(.81)/33(.19) HORNE, JAMES 945-7438 323 TIE PLANT LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM CROSSING GUARD HORTON, DEBORAH J. 835-1439 23 WINDSTONE DRIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 CENTRAL ELEM ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR HOUSER, RICHARD C. 988-0090 9226 CENTINAL JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 WAREHOUSE ROOFER HOUSTON, CURTIS A. 771-0457 4720 MASSIE NO LITTLE ROCK A 72118 NLRHS-11/12 LEAD CUSTODIAN HOUSTON, LINDA L. 851-3257 HEMLOCK CTS., #33 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HOWARD, GRACIE L. 2111 FRANKLIN ST. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 AMBOY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 33 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT HOWARD, HARVEY B. 835-7183 1205 KOEHLER CITY NLRHS-09/10 BOYS P.E., ATHLETICS HOWARD, LENORA SUE 835-7183 1205 KOEHLER REDWOOD THIRD YEAR HOWELL, LOU ANN ZIP SHERWOODA R 72116 SHERWOODA R 72116 676-6003 305 E 3RD LONOKE AR 72086 ROSE CITY GIRLS' P.E., HEALTH, CHEERLEADING/COACH, DPT CH HOWELL, NANNETTE LEE 470-0339 #13 VALLEY H LANE MAYFLOWERA R 72106 NLRHS-09/10 ENGLISH I HOYER, JEANE. 758-3704 PARK HILL HUDDLESTON, 758-6281 NLRHS-09/10 HUDSON, BETTY 753-4865 5201 FAIRWAY #7 COUNSELOR 37(.50) JEFFREY R. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 *43(.50) 2410 NORTH BERKLEY ENGLISH I, FOUND. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ART 5901 JFK BLVD.,APT. 5521 SECRETARY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ALT CENTER HUDSON, NELL C. 835-1949 ADMN. OFFICE HUDSON, TOMMYW . 7208 PONTIAC DR SECRETARY 778-9316 2444 LEE CR NLRHS-09/10 CIC I, II/TECH ED HUGHES, LOUISE E. 753-5135 5609 TARIL LANE RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT HUMPHREY, JAMES O. 945-9363 #40 CALM LANE RIDGEROAD ATHLETICS, HEALTH, P.E. HUNTER, CAROL F. 771-0882 5901 JFK BLVD, #1621 GLENVIEW KINDERGARTEN HUNTER, CAROLYN 945-3920 724 GRAHAM ST. LYNCH DRIVE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HUNTER, CHRISTIE A. NO LITTLE BENTON AR NO LITTLE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE 753-8656 349 GOSHEN NO LITTLE AMBOY SPEECH THERAPIST 31(.90) 45 (.10) HUTCHINSON, CONNIE T. ROCK ROCK ROCK ROCK ROCK ROCK 835-5483 307 N DEVON SHERWOODA R NORTH HEIGHTS COMPUTER LAB AIDE *41(.50) 11(.50) HUTSON, RENEE D. 225-3495 315 SHADOW RIDGE DR LITTLE ROCK AR REDWOOD KINDERGARTEN HYDE, BETTYE L. 455-3166 13300 MEYER ROAD MABELVALE AR MEADOWP ARK CHAPTER I AIDE 34 AR 72116 72015 AR 72118 AR 72117 AR 72116 AR 72117 AR 72116 72116 72211 72103 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION INGALLS, ASHLEY 753-3993 ALT CENTER INGRAM, ELAINE 227-5754 ADMN. OFFICE INGRAM, RONALD ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT A. 25 SUGAR CREEK BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT KAY 19 WOOD HILL DR. SPEECH THERAPIST CITY NLRHS-11/12 IRVING, WANDA 945-1655 6 511 STERLING DR BASKETBALL COACH, WORLD NELL 308 CHERYL PIKE VIEW ISGRIG, KIMBERL. FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 888-6021 10820 DREHER RD. ROSE CITY ENGLISH, 'GT FACILITATOR ISGRIG, MICHAEL 888-6021 ALT CENTER ISGRIG, MICHAEL 888-6021 10820 DREHER ROAD PARAPROFESSIONAL A. 10820 DREHER RD. BUS DRIVER ISRAELITT, JEANINE H. 835-7171 11 WAR EAGLE COURT ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 PROBLEMS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD LIFE SCIENCE, EARTH SCIENCE IVORY, LORINE 565-5325 PARK HILL JACKSON, BETH L. 3115 WARE FOURTH YEAR 834-0008 507 A, OAKDALE ROAD BOONE PARK MR/LD RESOURCE JACKSON, FRANCICAL 374-7979 721 N. HICKORY NORTH HEIGHTS PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY JACKSON, GLORIA J. 374-9175 608 HICKORY ST BUS DRIVER JACKSON, HOSEA JR. 374-7979 1008 E. 16TH BUS DRIVER JACKSON, HOSEA JR. 374-7979 1008 E. 16TH LAKEWOODE LEM JACKSON, JANE B. LUNCH PERIOD AIDE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 753-4307 36 DESOTO CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD EARTH SCIENCE, DEPT. CHAIR JACKSON, KATHRYN L. 758-0453 4408 ARLINGTON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FOURTH YEAR JACKSON, LORETTA P. 4813 ATKINS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 35 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY JACKSON, SUSIE 664-1729 B. INDIAN HILLS JACKSON, TINA C. 6407 SHERRY DR PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 982-7496 1901 LINDA LANE JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LYNCH DRIVE DEAF EDUCATION/MR/LO *37/47 JACOBS, DOROTHY J. 372-6501 2710 BATTERY PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT JACOBS, SONYA Y. 664-7608 1218 WASHINGTON LAKEWOODE LEM EARLY MORNINGA IDE JACOBS, SONYA Y. 664-7608 1218 WASHINGTON LAKEWOODE LEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JAMES, JACQUELYN R. 771-4720 605 WEST SCENIC, #L23 NLRHS-09/10 MEDIA AIDE JAMES, MELVIN LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 1503 GUM ST. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 PIKE VIEW CUSTODIAN JASPER, THELMA 224-6076 1400 OLD FORGE RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM JEFFREY, RICHARD L. 2909 STEPHANIE DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 BUS DRIVER JENKINS, GLADYS M. 758-7318 1711 POPLAR ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE JENKINS, LYNDA G. #5 RHODES AVE. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 JERROD, ERMA MEADOWP ARK BUS DRIVER 706 WALNUT THIRD YEAR JOHNSON, ALMA M. 565-9426 PO BOX 45522 RIDGEROAD JOHNSON, BUFORD 945-7973 WAREHOUSE JOHNSON, BUFORD 945-7973 JOHNSON, CAROLE 758-2530 BOONE PARK JOHNSON, CLARA 376-0035 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY L. 816 N. \"D\" ST. GENERAL LABOR L. 816 N. \"D\" ST. SECURITY MONITOR M. P . 0 . BOX 112 4 PARENT/HOMEWORKCE NTER o. 800 BEECH BLDG 4 APT 35 PARAPROFESSIONAL 36 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72214 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION JOHNSON, DELORIS ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 372-7256 300 E 13TH ST CITY NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT JOHNSON, DONNA M. 758-1181 RT 1 BOX 15-B MEADOWP ARK FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS JOHNSON, ERICA A. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SCRANTON AR 72863 945-7251 908 \"G\" ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE JOHNSON, FRED L. 679-3971 160 JOHNSON LOOP GREENBRIER AR 72058 NLRHS-11/12 INT. ALG., MATH III, ALG. II JOHNSON, JANNIE V. 945-4219 2112 HUNTER RD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT JOHNSON, JOYCE M. 375-2244 1305 VINE STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE MANAGER JOHNSON, KARLA A. 664-5746 2420 RIVERFRONT DR., #128 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR *46(.50)/42(.50) JOHNSON, KARLA A. 664-5746 2420 RIVERFRONT DR., #128 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 CRESTWOOD EARLY MORNING AIDE JOHNSON, MARTHA 945-5268 512 PARKDALE SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JOHNSON, MARYL. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 374-4723 1027 E 11TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LAKEWOODE LEM PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE JOHNSON, MARY LOUISE 374-4723 1027 E. 11TH ST. LAKEWOODE LEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JOHNSON, NADINE 945-9629 GLENVIEW JOHNSON, OZETTA 75 8-6872 NLRHS-09/10 JOHNSON, ROBERT 5113 N. WOODLAND LUNCH PERIOD AIDE #8 GREY CT. COVE ENGLISH I L. 945-9629 GLENVIEW JOHNSON, ROBERT 945-9629 GLENVIEW JOHNSTON, CARL B. 5113 N. WOODLAND EARLY MORNING AIDE L. 5113 N. WOODLAND LUNCH PERIOD AIDE NORTH LITTLE ROCK 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 888-6059 1301 W. DIXON RD., LOT 15 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LYNCH DRIVE CUSTODIAN JOHNSTON, CATHY L. 75 3-3855 4800 GREENWAYD .R. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW KINDERGARTEN 37 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT JONES, CHARLES L. 758-2856 6217 NORTH ALLEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11 / 12 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT-SEC JONES, DAVID A. 376-3967 616 E 7TH ST APT #5 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 LAKEWOODE LEM SIXTH YEAR JONES, DENISE 945-4403 315 PARKDALE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOODE LEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT JONES, EARNESTINE 945-2736 710 MILLS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER JONES, ELLEN M. 835-2935 6713 PONDEROSA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE COMMUNICATIONS7 /8 JONES, FAITH R. 758-2856 6217 N. ALLEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11/ 12 JONES, MARGUERITE PAL, COMPUTER LAB MANAGER, READING TEACHER 753-8046 1704 HAZEL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM FOOD SERVICE MANAGER JONES, ORVAL GENE 759-2569 RT. 1, BOX 147 BIGELOW AR 72016 ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPT.-INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES JONES, RICKEY E. 834-7204 126 KING PINE RD SHERWOODA R 72120 ROSE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT JONES, SANDRA A. 753-6555 6009 BUCKLES DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL FIRST YEAR JONES, SANDRA K. 753-2854 521 WISTERIA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-09/10 SECRETARY JONES, TAMMY L. 835-5829 12441 MARYLANDP LACE SHERWOODA R 72120 BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN JORDAN, JOSEPH 374-5964 814 NO CEDAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET EARLY MORNING AIDE JORDAN, JOSEPH 374-5964 814 NO. CEDAR NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 SEVENTH STREET PARENT HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE JORDAN, KATHRYNE A. 945-5858 4604 E. PUCKETT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ALT CENTER BA AIDE JORDAN, MARCUS D. 375-4127 803 VENTURA LAKEWOODE LEM LEAD CUSTODIAN JORGENSON, LIZBETH A. 758-5290 821 SILVER HILI,,, RD. NORTH HEIGHTS READING RECOVERY 38 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP JOSHUA, WILLIE 771-4979 E. JR. ADMN. OFFICE JOYCE, SANDRA M. RT. 6, BOX 228 LEAD CUSTODIAN 834-6202 2109 BLACK RIVER RD. NLRHS-11/12 MEDIA CLERK JUCKETT, SANDRA K. 835-6965 1801 E. LEE ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-ASST. SUPT. JUKES, REBECCA J. 758-4310 924 W. 45TH ST. NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT KAISER, PATRICIA A. 835-6701 #6 CUSTER PLACE NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION KAUFMAN, DAVID L. 753-0784 4521 NORTH CYPRESS NLRHS-11/12 AMERICAN HISTORY KELLAR, JOHNNY S. 679-5012 P.O. BOX 186 BARING CROSS PRINCIPAL KELLEY, DARLENE W. 945-5178 #12 GOODWIN CR. AMBOY SECOND YEAR KELLEY, NANCY L. 771-44 71 3808 LAKEWOODV ALLEY DR PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR KELLY, ARTHUR D. 945-4146 1518 W 14TH WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER KELLY, SHIRLEY K. 982-2089 24 PRESTON CT PARK HILL THIRD YEAR KELSO, BEVERLY A. 758-8082 4120 ROYAL OAK DRIVE LYNCH DRIVE PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY KENNEDY, DINAH L. 753-2548 6304 ALLWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK, A NO LITTLE ROCK AR SHERWOOD, AR FOR STUDENT AFFAIRS NO LITTLE ROCK AR SHERWOOD AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR WOOSTER, AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR JACKSONVILLE AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NLRHS-09/10 ALGEBRA I, ALGEBRA II/TRIG KENNEDY, ROGER LEE 945-6070 4708 HAYWOODS T NO LITTLE ROCK AR LAKEWOODM IDDLE CUSTODIAN KETCHER, RENETTA G. 75 3-78 82 21 EAST LAKE NO LITTLE ROCK AR NLRHS-11 / 12 GUIDANCE CLERK KIEKLAK, RONALD J. 758-6092 4613 DAWSON DRIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR NLRHS-09/10 PSYCHOLOGY, WORLD HISTORY KILLGORE, SHEILA K. 834-8002 9101 WOODBINE SHERWOOD AR RIDGEROAD p .E , ATHLETICS, DEPT. CHAIR. 39 72118 72116 72116 72118 72120 72116 72181 72117 72116 72204 72076 72116 72118 72114 72116 72116 72120 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT KIMBRELL, SHARRON J. 753-4911 5521 CRESCENT NLRHS-09/10 GEOMETRY, INT. ALG. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 KINCL, ANN B. 758-0888 3108 CLEBURNE PLACE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE KINCL, CAROLYN 835-6001 NLRHS-11 / 12 KING, ANGELIA M. SUPERVISOR-GIFTED/TALENTED *03/25 L. 917 COULTER SECRETARY 945-8906 100 HEMLOCK COURT ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL KING, JOE D. SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 327-2689 P.O. BOX 10287 CONWAYA R 72032 RIDGEROAD EITE KIRBY, CYNTHIA D. 851-1584 10206 POMEGRANATEA VE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-09/10 BIOLOGY, DEPT. CHAIR. KIRBY, MARJORIE H. 753-7089 4007 HILLSIDE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11/12 FOODS/CONS ED, FAM DYNAMICS KIRKWOOD, CATHY S. 945-7824 1124 HEALY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY MEDIA CLERK (.50) KIRSPEL, KENNETH A. 835-3369 5904 NORTH HILLS BLVD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 PRINCIPAL-SECONDARY KLEITSCH, PAMELA A. 758-8849 3911 LOCHRIDGE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 ROSE CITY ELEM SECOND YEAR 512 RICKY RACCOON DR JACKSONVILLE AR KNIGHT, RENA 835-8553 NLRHS-11 /12 KOETTEL, PATTI A. 72076 WORLD HISTORY, DEPT CHAIR 834-2475 11 PATTY LANE SEVENTH STREET KINDERGARTEN KOHLER, CLAIRE M. 227-4740 1921 CALGARY TRAIL BELWOOD FIFTH YEAR KOONE, BARBARA 753-7413 LYNCH DRIVE KOONE, VALARIE 753-7413 723 WEST 'A' FOURTH/FIFTH KAY 723 WEST A CENTRAL ELEM KINDERGARTEN LAIRY, VERDA J. YEARS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 945-7998 1521 BEN ST. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 ROSE CITY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT LAMAR, DIANNA G. 758-1575 2024 ORANGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER 40 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION LANES, QUILLA M. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 835-0509 1620 SARATOGA DR NLRHS-11/12 COUNSELOR LANGFORD, SALLIE F. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 834-2888 6905 FLINTROCK NLRHS-11/12 SPEECH, DEBATE, NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SR CABINET, BUS. COMM. LANGRELL, GWENNETHK . 835-5521 7824 POWELL SHERWOODA R 72116 AMBOY CHAPTER I AIDE LAREY, JILL A. 6401 GREENBANK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CRESTWOOD MEDIA SPECIALIST *42/32 LARSON, PAT A. 835-0889 7409 EAGLE PT DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS FIFTH YEAR LASHBROOK, BARBARA J. 834-6339 300 INDIANHEAD COVE, #50 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72120 ALT CENTER TEACHER AIDE LASTER, GREGORY L. 945-5789 2114 EDMONDS ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSEA SSISTANT, FOOD SERVICE LAWHON, JILL M. 455-0016 12021 BLACK WALNUT CR LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 Al-'.iBOY SECOND YEAR LAWRENCE, JUNE 771-1032 3600 NORTH HILLS BLVD NLRHS-09/10 CCVE, 1/2 ACT DIRECTOR LEBLANC, ANN-MARIE 791-0901 143 PLAINVIEW CIRCLE NLRHS-11/12 SPEECH TEACHER LEE, BRENDA K. 376-8996 800 N BEECH BLDG 1 APT13 NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT LEE, DEBORAH A. 562-8468 11121 LEGION HUT RD. BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE MANAGER LEE, GLORIA 753-3275 2208 W. 38TH BELWOOD LEE, GLORIA 753-3275 BELWOOD LEE, HELENE. 835-6229 PIKE VIEW LEE, HELENE. 835-6229 PIKE VIEW LEE, PHILIP E. LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 2208 W. 38TH EARLY MORNING AIDE 1206 KOEHLER EARLY MORNING AIDE 1206 KOEHLER CHAPTER I AIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MABELVALEA R 72103 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOODA R 72116 SHERWOODA R 72116 228-7755 #4 JOSEPHINE C~T LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 NLRHS-09/10 PHYSICAL SCIENCE, BIOLOGY 41 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION LEFEAR, BILL 223-0626 RIDGEROAD LEFEAR, BILL ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 3009 DORSET DR. COACH, GEOG. 223-0626 3009 DORSET DR BUS DRIVER LEMOINE, BURTON A. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 753-2058 5004 STRATFORD RD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BUS DRIVER LENARD, IZIH JR. 666-0867 1505 W. TWIN LAKES DR. BUS DRIVER LEWIS, FRANCIS LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 835-7287 6308 CHIPPEWA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE GIRLS P.E.,/ATHLETICS LEWIS, LINDA S. 945-5464 119 BLENDEN NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 NLRHS-09/10 CUSTODIAN LEWIS, NAVEDA D. 753-6276 704 EAST MILITARY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 LAKEWOODE LEM BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENTA IDE LEWIS, STELLA M. 753-6766 4615 ORANGE ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT LILES, CAROLE G 758-7724 4421 GREENWAYD R NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS SECOND/THIRD YEARS LILLY, CAROLYN SUE 758-7132 10750 CRYSTAL HILL RD.,K MAUMELLE, AR 72113 ROSE CITY ELEM FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS LIPSMEYER, L. LOUENE 664-2244 312 NO. WOODROWST . LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 CENTRAL ELEM SIXTH YEAR LISTER, KATHY L. 568-3640 8004 DANWOOD LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NLRHS-11/12 CHEMISTRY LITTLE, DARLENE C. 568-9420 5702 TRENTON LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION LIVELY, BOBBYE 758-3716 2821 DELMAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE SECRETARY LOFTON, DWIGHT A. 758-6955 5901 J.F.K. APT. 3322 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 CIVICS, ATHLETICS, WORLD PROBLEMS LONDON, CYNTHIA C. 834-3171 3610 E. MARYLAND# 1313 SHERWOODA R 72120 ROSE CITY SPEECH THERAPIST LONG, GAYEL. 758-7384 3516 N. OLIVE ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS SPEECH THERAPIST *41/24 42 .... NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION LONG, MARY P. 945-0674 NLRHS-09/10 LOOMIS, NANCY 834-3270 PARK HILL ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT .2313 LANSBROOK CCVE L. 502 AUTUMNBROOKC R. CHAPTER I AIDE LOPEZ, CHARLENE L. 758-3497 5513 GRANBY RD REDWOOD MR/LO RESOURCE CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LOTT, LISA M. 228-5425 RIDGEROAD LOVE, CAROLYN 758-0500 AMBOY 90 WOODLORE CR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ENGLISH/SOCIAL STUDIES, STUDENT COUNCIL ADVISOR 4401 SCHAER ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 2010 CRUTCHER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LOWE, BETTY A. 758-06 65 AMBOY EARLY MORNING DUTY AIDE LOWE, CAROLYN W. CAFE. OFFICE LOWE, CATHERINE 664-3730 RIDGEROAD LOWE, KAYE 753-0439 CENTRAL ELEM LUCAS, REVA 945-2018 REDWOOD LUTES, SALLY 223-8707 REDWOOD ANN LUTHY, FRED A. 2501 N FRANKLIN OFFICE SECRETARY-FOOD T. 9 BEVERLY PLACE FRENCH 6605 ALLWOOD PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY 2603 E. WASHINGTON LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 4710 SAM PECK RD #1020 SIXTH YEAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SERVICES LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK A 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 753-0104 4008 MELLENE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-09/10 LEAD CUSTODIAN LYBARGER, CINDY L. 753-4124 5416 BELLE POINT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM CHAPTER I COMPUTER LAB AIDE LYMAN, JOYCE 227-9127 41 FOREST CR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODM IDDLE LIFE SCIENCE, EARTH SCIENCE LYNCH, NANCY 945-3811 6613 WHIPPORWILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT LYONS, FREDERICK D. 753-9598 804 \"I\" ST. DIXIE ADD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTH HEIGHTS CROSSING GUARD LYONS, FREDERICK D. 817 W. 53RD NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NORTH HEIGHTS CUSTODIAN 43 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT MACKLIN, DIANA LYNN 843-4317 17 LINDULAKE DRIVE PIKE VIEW FIFTH YEAR MAGNESS, SHIRLEY V. 945-1950 2 WRIGHT CR LYNCH DRIVE SECRETARY MAHER, JIMMY D. 470-0376 #29 CIRCLE DR. WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER MALONE, FRANCES 224-6675 REDWOOD MALONE, FRANCES 224-6675 REDWOOD N. 3306 BOYD SELF CONTAINED MR N. 3306 BOYD EARLY MORNING AIDE MANN, PAMELA ROSE 758-3442 210 W. 51ST ST. BUS DRIVER K. 612 W 36TH CITY MANNING, SHEILA 771-2250 CENTRAL ELEM MANZ, ALEXANDER 568-6901 NLRHS-09/10 MARLIN, CAROLYN FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT A. 5911 TIMBERSIDE RD. GERMAN I,II (.50) 945-4860 503 WATER ROSE CITY ELEM THIRD YEAR MARSHALL, LEONARD E. 376-8306 800 BEECH, APT. #45 BUS DRIVER MARSHALL, LEONARD E. 376-8306 800 BEECH ST, APT #45 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT MARSHALL, NANCY L. 851-4837 3 CRYSTAL MTN. LANE SEVENTH STREET MR/LD RESOURCE MARSHALL, SHIRLEY A. 375-4064 P.O. BOX 4652 ROSE CITY SPECIAL EDUCATION MARSHALL, TWANA D. ZIP CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MAYFLOWER, AR 72106 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MAUMELLE, AR 72113 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 376-1735 1816 PARKER NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT MARTIN, BETTY F. 753-1467 1108 NELBROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ALT CENTER TEACHER AIDE MARTIN, BRENDA K. 982-2991 26 WRIGHT CIRCLE JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 PIKE VIEW MEDIA SPECIALIST MARTIN, CALVIN J. 374-5942 1204 PARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SKILLS CENTER LEAD CUSTODIAN 44 NAME. TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 607 HEMPHILL CITY MARTIN , CARVIN.  835-9078 NLRHS-11 / 12 MARTIN, DEBORAH 945-1312 NLRHS-09/10 MARTIN, JAMES JR. MAINTENANCE CUSTODIAN 5223 SO. WOODLAND LEAD CUSTODIAN 945-1312 5223 SO. WOODLAND GLENVIEW CUSTODIAN MARTIN, LETITIA R. 834-1469 7907 PINTO TRAIL ADMN. OFFICE INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER MARTIN, MICHAEL L. 897-4710 P.O. BOX 174 NORTH HEIGHTS CUSTODIAN MARTIN, MICHELLE V. 945-0092 1101 W. 22ND SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE MANAGER MARTIN, NANCY A. 771-4983 3420 FIESTA PARK HILL EARLY MORNING AIDE MARTIN, NANCY A. 771-4983 3420 FIESTA PARK HILL PARENT/HOMEWORKC ENTER MARTIN, TERI L. 834-2800 LAKEWOODE LEM MARTIN, VALERIE 791-0120 AMBOY MARTIN, YOLANDA 2500 SEMINOLE TRAIL THIRD YEAR D. 431 MCCAIN, RC-F21 LUNCH PERIOD AIDE ZIP SHERWOODA R 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SHERWOODA R 72116 COORDINATOR WRIGHTSVILLE AR 72183 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 945-4299 400 N. PALM, APT. 73 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ALT CENTER FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT MASCUILLI, KATHY L. 221-1262 15 RED MAPLE COURT ROSE CITY ELEM SECOND/THIRD YEARS ~lASCUILLI, SAM JOSEPH LITTLE ROCK, AR 221-1262 15 RED MAPLE CT LITTLE ROCK AR NLRHS-11/12 PSYCHOLOGY, PEER LEADERSHIP, TENNIS MASSEY, BILLIE JUNE 72211 72211 753-7727 4501 LAKEVIEW RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS SECRETARY-ELEMENTARY* 48/38 MASSEY, CHARLOTTE A. 834-3265 7817 NORTH HILLS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE KEYBOARDING, DEPT CHAIR *25/26 MASSEY, JERRY D. 834-3265 7817 NORTH HILLS BLVD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL PLANT SERVICES MASTERSON, OSCAR E. 843-2212 #12 LINDULAKE RD CABOT AR 72023 WAREHOUSE HEATING \u0026amp; A/C MAINTENANCE 45 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT MATTHEWS, ANNETTE 851-3159 13 OAK FOREST LOOP CITY ADMN. OFFICE VOCATIONAL EVALUATOR MATTHEWS, BETTIANNE H. 851-2567 14708 LONE PINE RD CENTRAL ELEM SIXTH YEAR MATTOCKS, JUANITA 116 PULASKI ST. SEVENTH STREET LEAD CUSTODIAN MATTOX, MARGIE 771-0358 4716 BUNKER HILL DR SEVENTH STREET FIRST/SECOND YEARS MAXAM, DENISE G. 835-5089 6904 INCAS INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN MAXWELL, JIMMY L. 834-3463 6328 HOPI BOONE PARK EARLY MORNING AIDE MAXWELL, JIMMY 834-3463 L. BOONE PARK MAXWELL, SARAC. 6328 HOPI MEDIA 834-3463 6328 HOPI NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION MAY, FAYE LOUISE 835-3052 6301 IROQUOIS INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE MANAGER MAYERHOFF, CAROLL. 851-8760 #1 HOGAN DR. AMBOY SECOND/THIRD YEARS MCADAMS, CAROL ANN ZIP MAUMELLEA R 72113 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MAUMELLEA R 72113 664-7419 2006 CANAL POINTE LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NLRHS-11/12 DRAMA II, III, IV, PR SPEECH/DRAMA, DEPT. CHAIR MCAFEE, MARJORIE E. 225-7491 47 KINGSBRIDGE WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 NLRHS-09/10 ALG. I, INT. ALG. MCALPINE, MARVA L. 223-2486 13419 POMPANO DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODE LEM SECOND YEAR MCCANN, CONNIE S. 851-3772 50 OPHELIA DR MAUMELLE, AR 72113 NLRHS-09/10 DWG. I, II, FOUND. IN ART *13/25 MCCAULEY, GLORIA L. 753-3737 4904 N VINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY MCCLAIN, VIVIAN D. 568-4999 9500 SO HEIGHTS, #139 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE MCCLINTON, JANE P. 835-1586 7905 BEECHFIELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW SECOND YEAR 46 NA..E TELEPHONE LOCATION s. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP MCCOLLUM, ANN 758-2434 NLRHS-09/10 MCCOLLUM, LEAH 758-9410 GLENVIEW MCCONNELL, AVA 4521 AUSTIN DR GUIDANCE COUNSELOR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 B. 5901 JFK BLVD. APT 5533 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 FIRST/SECOND YEARS 945-2735 509 ELLEN DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY MCCONNELL, GAIL 221-9512 AD.MN. OFFICE MCCORD, AUBREY FOOD SERVICE MANAGER SUZANNE 720 BOW~JANR D. LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 SPEECH THERAPIST EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM I. 758-5015 2020 AUGUSTA CUSTODIAN NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 AMBOY MCCORKLE, RUTH A. 753-6020 5700 SUMMERTREE #SG12 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GLENVIEW SELF CONTAINED MR MCCOY, DARRELL G. 834-8187 101 SPRINGOAK ST SHERWOODA R 72120 NLRHS-11/12 DRAFTING I, II, MATH II MCDONALD, PATRICIA A. 771-0355 6301 CAMP ROBS RD A-153B NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOODM IDDLE COMPUTERL AB MANAGER* 25/24 MCDONALD, PATRICIA S. 753-4263 3004 MARTINEAU NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE MEDIA SPECIALIST MCDOWELL, LAURAL. 758-1785 4201 BUNKER HILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE HEALTH, DEPT. CHAIR. MCDOWELL, ROYS. 374-4602 722 SHERMAN LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NLRHS-09/10 COMP SPEECH, DRAMA I, II, DEPT CHAIR MCELROY, GAYLA D. 945-1682 4812 HAYWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT R. ROSE CITY MCGEE, SHIRLEY 753-2241 5124 CHANDLER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW MCGHEE, LAURA T. COMPUTER LAB AIDE - CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .SO 758-6468 #5 VALERIE COURT LAKEWOODM IDDLE GEOGRAPHY, STUDENT MCGINLEY, DONNAS K. 851-3978 10216 CLEMATIS NLRHS-11/12 OHE, OHE LAB, INT. MCGINNIS, CAROLYN SUE 843-8299 16 SUNSET LANE BOONE PARK FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS MCGLOTHIN, DENA 758-0795 3724 LOCHRIDGE LAKEWOODM IDDLE ENGLISH 7, ACTIVITY 47 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 COUNCIL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 REL/PARENT CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 DIRECTOR II I NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT RT. 4, BOX 486C LUNCH PERIOD AIDE MCGUIRE, BESSIE 945-7080 CENTRAL ELEM MCGUIRE, LUVENIA 945-7080 RT. 4, BOX 486C CENTRAL ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE MCKAIG, ANN C. 753-6371 ALT CENTER MCKINLEY, DAVID 2517 FRANKLIN PARAPROFESSIONAL 562-5321 8222 SPANISH RD BUS DRIVER MCMILLEN, MARTHA B. 679-4844 46 ROBINSON RD. ADMN. OFFICE HOMEBOUNDTE ACHER MCMILLION, KATHRYN L. 753-8972 100 ARIZONA AVE. REDWOOD CHAPTER I AIDE MCMORAN, JULIE A. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 GREENBRIER, AR 72058 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-4383 4405 WESTRIDGE DR NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 CRESTWOOD FOOD SERVICE MANAGER MCMUNN, KIMBERLY D. 758-6121 5204 SCHAER NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 WAREHOUSE SAFETY COORDINATOR MCMURRY, JAMES A. JR. 835-7624 132 VERONAC IRCLE SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-11/12 MARKETING MGT., FASH. MERCH. MCMURRY, NANCY R. 835-7624 132 VERONAC IRCLE SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-11/12 MEDIA SPECIALIST MCPHERSON, DAVID M. 327-2302 1905 BERRY PLACE CONWAYA R 72032 BARING CROSS CCE COORDINATOR MCPHERSON, JO ELLEN 327-2302 1905 BERRY PLACE CONWAYA R 72032 BARING CROSS SELF-CONTAINED MR MCRAE, CHRISTINE C. 666-0020 3230 OZARK ST. LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NLRHS-11/12 GT FACILITATOR, ENGLISH III, IV MEABON, LEVERTA 945-5144 P.O. BOX 17003 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 GLENVIEW COMPUTER LAB AIDE - CHAPTER I .SO/DISTRICT .50 MEDLEY, JAMES H. 4218 W. 25TH SEVENTH STREET CROSSING GUARD MELTON, CYNTHIA SUE 758-0176 5 FOXBORO CT. AMBOY MR-LD RESOURCE MENARD, THELMA LITTLE ROCK, AR 72203 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-7948 602 W 22ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-11/12 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 48 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MEYERS, YVETTE ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 982-0639 1310 SMITHWICK #235 GLENVIEW CHAPTER I AIDE MICHAEL, KAY C. 221-1577 701 CEDAR RIDGE DR. NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN MILLER, MARY C. CITY ZIP JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 753-7429 6501 RUSTIC LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE MILLER, SUSAN M. 663-1116 2815 N. PIERCE LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NLRHS-09/10 SPEECH THERAPY MILLS, DEAN W. 758-0584 3805 ORANGE ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE VOCATIONAL PARA-PROFESSIONAL MISEE, TOMMYH . 327-0747 272 MILLPOND DR CONWAYA R 72032 WAREHOUSE LEAD PLUMBER MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. 753-2886 3906 HILLSIDE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BOONE PARK CHAPTER I AIDE MITCHELL, RUBY F. 753-4863 610.9 GREEN BANK RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR OF BOOKKEEPING MITCHELL, TERESA D. 663-9372 2400 RIVERFRONT #1234 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 CENTRAL ELEM SPECIAL EDUCATION MOMPHREY, BETTY J. 945-8172 2910 E. 2ND ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT MONK, E. CAROL 771-0165 5431 PIKE AVE. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 AMBOY 1/2 PARENT CTR COOR-1/2 MEDIA CLERK *31/49 MONTGOMERYN, ANCYA . 753-6009 4505 DAWSON DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 REDWOOD FIRST YEAR MOODY, SHARI R. 771-0368 6208 EAST RIDGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BOONE PARK FIRST YEAR MOODY, SHERLENE 961-1728 CAFE. OFFICE MOORE, CARL 758-4896 NLRHS-11 / 12 MOORE, KAY A. 758-0474 BOONE PARK 908 WHITEHEAD WAREHOUSEM ANAGER 222 EAST E. ST AMERICAN HISTORY, 6509 ALLWOOD H.O.T.S. TEACHER MOORE, MARGARETL . NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PSYCHOLOGY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 851-1217 #7 PAR DR. MAUMELLEA R 72113 LAKEWOODM IDDLE LIFE SCIENCE, EARTH SCIENCE, PAWS, DEPT. CHAIR. 49 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MOORE, NANCY H. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 224-9730 17 WALNUT VALLEY DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ALT CENTER PSYCHOLOGIST - ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL MORGAN, ANNIE M. 661-1761 66 FLAG RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 LAKEWOODE LEM THIRD YEAR MORRIS, DANA L. 835-7859 114 ALMOND COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BELWOOD FIRST YEAR MORRIS, JAMES C. 851-7565 112 OAK RIDGE COVE MAUMELLEA R 72113 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL MORRIS, JOHNNY LEE 771-4670 4901 VAUGHN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BUS MECHANIC MORRIS, NANCY E. 888-2789 74 INDIAN SPRINGS DRIVE ALEXANDER AR ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, COMPUTER SERVICES MORRIS, PATSY S. 758-3551 1809 MILLCREEK RD LAKEWOODM IDDLE MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA MORRISON, CHARLES W 835-5214 108 CALLAWAY WAREHOUSE LEAD CARPENTER MORROW, JANET LEA 796-8401 31 GOFF LAKEWOODE LEM FIFTH/SIX YEARS MORROW, NORMA J. 753-4546 2221 CRESTWOODR D AMBOY SIXTH YEAR MURDAUGH, DOTTIE A. 835-4193 6609 CURRY CT INDIAN HILLS FIRST YEAR MURPHY, BEN 945-0810 ROSE CITY ELEM MUSE, JANICE M. 835-4535 600 WATER CROSS ING GUARD 7924 CLAREMONT NORTH HEIGHTS CLERK/OFFICE *41/44 MUSHINSKI, JO ANN NO LITTLE ROCK 8, ALGEBRA 8 SHERWOODA R VILONIA AR NO LITTLE ROCK NO LITTLE ROCK NO LITTLE ROCK, SHERWOODA R 72002 AR 72116 72120 72173 AR 72116 AR 72116 A 72117 72116 771-0581 6513 ROLLING HILLS DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, ASST. SUPT.-BUSINESS SERVICES MYERS, DOROTHY I. 982-9259 15 FOXFIRE COVE JACKSONVILLE AR NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION NAGEL, HAMIYET 988-5461 NLRHS-09 /10 NARKINSKY, JOHN 835-1122 NLRHS-11/12 4506 MADDOXR D #6 BIOLOGY c. 500 BURNTWOOD FOOTBALL COACH, 50 JACKSONVILLE AR SHERWOODA R MATH II, III 72076 72076 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION s. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP NAYLOR, JANET 835-1883 6401 PAWNEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE NELSON, LAURAL. VOCATIONAL PARA-PROFESSIONAL 758-5610 116 LATONA LANE, APT. #26 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE NELSON, NORMAL. 868-5494 8302 HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD LYNCH DRIVE FIFTH/SIXTH YEAR NESBITT, TOMMIE W. 375-1943 #26 GRANITE MTN. CR. BUS DRIVER NESS, MARGARETA . 835-6291 5716 WOODRIDGEL N ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY NEUMEIER, SHANON KAY 851-1861 32 VICTORIA SEVENTH STREET FOURTH YEAR NICHOALDS, DELLA M. 758-9072 P.O. BOX 1328 ROSE CITY SAC MANAGER NICHOLS, JOYCE J. 224-7485 111405 MARA LYNN #14 PIKE VIEW MR/LD RESOURCE NIVENS, CORA A. 565-7770 7019 REDWOODD R MEADOWP ARK SECONDY EAR NOAH, JUDY G. 834-2909 108 ROBIN GLEN NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION NOBLETT, BARBARA J. 961-9469 615 DORTCH LOOP BUS DRIVER NOBLETT, BARBARA J. 961-9469 615 DORTCH LOOP BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE NOEL, MINNIE M. LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 SHERWOODA R 72120 MAUMELLE, AR 72113 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 SHERWOODA R 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 758-4468 3703 MCCAIN DR., #K NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT NOEL, TERRY P. 758-4468 3703 K MCCAIN PARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS CROSSING GUARD NOLAND, JOHN M. 834-3503 2118 N. MAIN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-09/10 COMMUNICATIONSU R., DRAMAI NORMAN, VIRGINIA L. 835-1355 2604 SEMINOLE TR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM KINDERGARTEN/FIRST NORWOOD, CAROL R. 834-2526 #1 SHELLEY RD., APT. 512 SHERWOOD, AR 72120 BOONE PARK THIRD/FOURTH YEARS 51 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION NOVAK, BONNIE 843-0255 E. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT . P O BOX 190 BOONE PARK FIFTH YEAR NUNLEY, THERON S. 601 CENTER NORTH HEIGHTS FIFTH/SIXTH O'DELL, CONNIE J. YEARS 676-2911 RT. 3, BOX 301-10 NORTH HEIGHTS FOURTH YEAR O'DELL, DAVID W. CITY 676-2911 REMINGTON RT3, BOX 301-10 WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER OBERLE, SANDRA J. 835-0561 30 JACKSON OAKS PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR ODOM, BARBARA C. 753-4027 1310 W 49TH GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ODOM, FELICIE P. 758-4531 6608 GREEN BANK RD ROSE CITY ELEM FIRST YEAR OGDEN, CLARENCE LEE JR. 834-7254 114 HEMLOCK WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER OGDEN, JOY FAYE 843-4917 41 BRIARWOOD CENTRAL ELEM LEAD CUSTODIAN OLIGER, BEVERLY C. 842-1920 85 QUEENS RD LAKEWOODM IDDLE ENGLISH *25/24 OLIGER, JANELLE 753-8898 5709 MARION BOONE PARK SECRETARY ORMAN, LELA G. 490-0651 6405 PECAN ROSE CITY FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ORR, ROBERT C. 835-4627 1201 LOOP RD. ALT CENTER MATH 7-12 OTWELL, D. SHARON 221-7193 #3 TREASURE HILL CR ROSE CITY CCVE PACE, SHERRYL. 1403 STARFIELD NORTH HEIGHTS SECOND YEAR PAPINEAU, DEBORAH A. 851-7124 #1 OAK FOREST LANE BOONE PARK SELF CONT. B.A. PARKER, BENJAMIN 945-2095 6520 MEDFORD MEADOWP ARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 52 ZIP CABOT AR 72023 CONWAY, AR 72032 LONOKE AR 72086 LONOKE AR 72086 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOODA R 72120 CABOT AR 72023 ENGLAND AR 72046 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72120 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MAUMELLEA R 72113 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION PARKER, BENJAMIN ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 945-2095 6520 MEDFORD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOWP ARK CROSSING GUARD PARKER, BRENDA A. 791-0872 2000 PARKWAY VLGE, #305 NO LITTLE ROCK RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN PARKER, BRENDA SUE 835-9655 #48 TENNYSON CT NO LITTLE ROCK INDIAN HILLS PHYSICAL THERAPIST 48/30 PARKER, EDITH F. 945-0189 2000 PARKWAY, #539 NO LITTLE ROCK CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE PARKER, MARY ANN 982-5839 6309-10 PETERS RD CRESTWOOD FOOD SERVICE MANAGER PARKER, RENITA G. 565-7543 6804 ASHER AVE., APT. 62 PIKE VIEW SIXTH YEAR PARSLEY, CARRIE A. 758-7819 200 LEE ST MEADOWP ARK SPECIAL EDUCATION PARTRIDGE, PATRICIA J. 771-2041 4528 VALLEY BROOK ALT CENTER WORK SKILLS, CO PAUL, MARSHA Y. 227-4055 8002 EVERGREEN SEVENTH STREET PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY PEACOCK, MARY K. 835-7763 1704 OKMULGEE SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE PEARSON, JAMES E. 835-4711 7608 TOMAHAWKD R CAFE. OFFICE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FOOD PEARSON, PATSY JACKSONVILLE AR LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK NO LITTLE ROCK LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK NO LITTLE ROCK SERVICES AR 72118 AR 72116 AR 72118 72076 72204 AR 72118 AR 72116 72207 AR 72116 AR 72116 835-4711 7608 TOMAHAWKD R NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 COE I, II,COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, DEPT. CHAIR PECK, CASSANDRA M. 945-1852 6211 SYDNEY ROAD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM FIFTH YEAR PEDERSON, SHIRLEY 374-8554 320 W. 14TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM CROSSING GUARD PEDERSON, SHIRLEY 374-8554 320 WEST 14TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE PERDUE, STEVEN 835-9735 RIDGEROAD PERKINS, MARLA E. 6200 PONTIAC AMERICAN HISTORY c. 513 GLYNN LANE BUS DRIVER 53 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 8' DEPT CHAIR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY PERKINS, MARLA C. 513 GLYNN LANE NO LITTLE BARING CROSS SELF CONTAINED MR PETROSS, JULIE A. 753-2892 4419 ORANGE NO LITTLE BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE PETTIT, JEAN 842-3762 PO BOX 831 NO LITTLE NLRHS-11/12 GUIDANCE SECRETARY-REGISTRAR PETTIT, SHERRI 945-8860 6612 STONEHEDGE NO LITTLE REDWOOD SECRETARY PFLUGHAUPT, MARY J. 835-5162 15 CARDINAL VALLEY DR NO LITTLE RIDGEROAD MATH 7, MATH 8, DEPT. CHAIR. PHARO, M. JANN ZIP ROCK AR 72117 ROCK AR 72118 ROCK AR 72115 ROCK AR 72117 ROCK AR 72120 771-4116 3674V, MCCAIN PARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR - EVEN START PROGRAM PHAUP, STEPHEN 753-1517 6 DESOTO CR N LITTLE ROCK, AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR - SPECIAL SERVICES PHAUP, VALERIE B. 753-1517 6 DESOTO CR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE MEDIA SPECIALIST *37/47 PHELPS, LARRY G. 565-9595 5011 GREENFIELD DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 WAREHOUSE ENERGY SPECIALIST PHENNA, ALISA A. 375-1029 201 W 14TH LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 ADMN. OFFICE EVENSTART PARAPROFESSIONAL PHILLIPS, BOBBIE LU 329-7817 #48 CHATEAUV ILLAGE CONWAYA R 72032 NORTH HEIGHTS SELF CONT. B.A. PICKENS, CAROL A. 835-6352 8313 EDMAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL PICKETT, JAMES R. 758-8648 NLRHS-09/10 PIGGEE, LOVETTA 228-6782 CENTRAL ELEM PIGGEE, LOVETTA 5109 RANDLOPH RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ATHLETICS, WORLD PROBLEMS, CIVICS GAIL 2104 SCOTTY CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 PRE-SCHOOL CENTER AIDE GAIL 228-6782 2104 SCOTTY CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 CENTRAL ELEM EARLY MORNING AIDE PIKER, ALETHA 753-0856 5913 GRANBY LAKEWOODM IDDLE GUIDANCE SECRETARY PINKERTON, K. MARK 376-2238 1409 NANNETTE ROSE CITY ATHLETICS, P.E. 54 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT PLATT, YOLANDA A. CITY ZIP 835-5881 . 6 NORTHAVENP L SHERWOODA R 72120 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-DIRECTORO F ELEMENTARYE DUCATION PLOSZAY, JANE 753-0338 725 W. \"A\" NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET THIRD YEAR PONDER, ANNE S. 753-4982 NLRHS-09/10 POOL, RHONDA R. #5 MCKEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ALG. II, GEOM. (.86) *13/25 12 OAKBROOKE SHERWOOD, AR 72120 INDIAN HILLS SECOND YEAR PORTER, NANCY JO 851-4501 10411 POMEGRANATEA VE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY COMPUTER LAB AIDE *31(.50) 11(.50) PORTER, NATALIE 945-0674 2313 LANSBROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOODM IDDLE ENGLISH 7, ENGLISH 8 POWELL, HOLLY H. 227-9981 215 BROOKSIDE DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 BELWOOD MR/LD RESOURCE POWELL, JOHN R. 791-2758 209 LINDENHURST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BOONE PARK FOURTH YEAR POWER, MARY M. 834-4947 603 PEMBROKE SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-11/12 WORD PROCESSING,COMP. ACCOUNTING II, KEY BOARD. POWER, PORTIA L. 771-2395 #17 EAST LAKE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODE LEM PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY PRATT, SANDRA M. 945-7170 216 CHERYL ST. NO. LITTLE ROCK, 72114 NLRHS-09/10 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT PRICE, JUANITA 945-0425 2409 AMBERLY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER PRIEST, CHARLES L. 758-6002 P . 0. BOX 16 5 4 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 CENTRAL ELEM CUSTODIAN PROFIT, CYNTHIA D. 753-7084 #89 EASTGATE TERRACE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 CENTRAL ELEM CROSSING GUARD PRUETT, KIM A. 753-4569 800 NICOLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION PURIFOY, FONDA L. 374-8184 1312 NANNETTE ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BELWOOD CHAPTER I AIDE PURTLE, DAMARIS K. 758-9910 5704 RANDOLPH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS MEDIA SPECIALIST 55 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION QUARRY, CINDY A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 1923 RAINWOOD COVE LAKEWOODM IDDLE COUNSELOR QUATTLEBAUMJ, UDITH ANN CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 225-2474 26 KINGSBRIDGE WAY LITTLE ROCK, AR 72212 NLRHS-09/10 ENGLISH I, II RAGLAND, KATHY A. 758-8953 5925 VALERIE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY MEDIA/OFFICE CLERK (*31/35 RAINEY, HAZEL I. 753-7746 4313 N. LOCUST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE SELF CONTAINED MR RAMEY, KATHRYN R. 753-7974 2704 DONAGHEYD R NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 ALGEBRA I, GEOMETRY, DEPT. CHAIR. RAMSEY, LEE 753-2361 3801 ORANGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL CUSTODIAN RASUL-LLAH, BETTY 945-2073 5106 S. WOODLAND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 DISPATCHER RATLIFF, SHERRY ANN 835-0383 103 CORONADOP LACE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 ROSE CITY GEOGRAPHY, AMERICAN HISTORY, ACT DIR,DEPT CHAIR REAVES, BIRLEATHER 374-3977 422 W 32ND LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NORTH HEIGHTS FOURTH YEAR REBSAMEN, PATRICIA A. 753-6208 5008 RANDOLPH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GLENVIEW SECRETARY REDDEN, CLARA L. 664-5630 2005 S HARRISON LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 GLENVIEW FIRST YEAR REED, MARY ANN 834-2013 109 CORKWOOD R. JACKSONVILLE, AR 72076 ROSE CITY ELEM FOURTH YEAR REED, REBECCA A. 771-4731 2401 LAKEVIEW, P6 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS THIRD YEAR REED, URSULA L. 375-8067 800 BEECH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PIKE VIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE REED, URSULA N. 377-6689 P.O. BOX 164644 LITTLE ROCK AR 72216 ADMN. OFFICE EVEN START PARAPROFESSIONAL REEVES, MELISSA MICHELLE 758-6836 209 TIMBERLINE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 AMBOY FOURTH YEAR REYNOLDS, A. JOHNETTE 470-3219 #58 SNUGGS CIRCLE MAYFLOWERA R 72106 ROSE CITY ENGLISH/SOCIAL STUDIES 56 NAME. TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT REYNOLDS, SUZZETTE CITY ZIP 5208 SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11 /12 RHOADES, PATSY 758-0878 BARING CROSS COMM ART, PAINTING I, II, VOCATIONAL, SR. CAB. A. 4806 SCHAER NO LITTLE ROCK 72118 SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE RICE, BERTHA 945-3912 ROSE CITY RICE, JOHN W. 961-9122 RIDGEROAD RICE, JOHN W. P.O. BOX 17485 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 961-9122 RIDGEROAD RICH, LARRY G. FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 14102 OLD RIVER RD EARLY MORNING AIDE 14102 OLD RIVER RD ATHLETICS, GEOGRAPHY SCOTT AR 72142 SCOTT AR 72142 2022 ROMINE RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 ADMN. OFFICE SATURDAY DETENTION SUPERVISOR RICHARDSON, FANNIE J. 224-8484 PO BOX 165891 LITTLE ROCK AR 72216 PIKE VIEW CROSSING GUARD RICHBOURG, MARY SUE 835-3956 118 VERNONAC R SHERWOODA R 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY RICHEY, TRACY MARIE 758-6149 2402 WILSHIRE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BELWOOD KINDERGARTEN RIGGINS, BOBBIE J. 945-5198 5003 GLENVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 ADMN. OFFICE SOCIAL WORKER RIGSBY, A. WILENE 753-4073 4306 IDLEWILD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD EARTH SCIENCE RITCHIE, SUZANNE E. 758-5408 3420 N OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 ENGLISH I ROBBINS, DON JAMES 834-8349 103 SHADY GROVE SHERWOODA R 72120 NLRHS-11/12 AM. HIST, WORLD GEOG. ROBBINS, JON 791-0444 3690 M MCCAIN PARK DR. NO LITTLE ROCK A 72116 NLRHS-11/12 CHEMISTRY ROBERTS, PATTRICE M. 945-4272 P.O. BOX 1612 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 ADMN. OFFICE EVEN START PARAPROFESSIONAL ROBERTSON, ARLEAN M 375-2698 803 E. 13TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION ROBERTSON, CAROLYN 375-4660 1618 SCHAER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 57 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT ROBERTSON, VICKY W. CITY ZIP 835-4899 6708 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I LAB AIDE ROBINSON, ALFRED 758-7679 2600 JOHN ASHLEY DR F-106 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER ROBINSON, ARTHUR LEE JR. 375-6837 609 HICKORY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS ROBINSON, JOYCE L. 758-4763 19 THERESA DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LYNCH DRIVE CHAPTER I AIDE ROBINSON, LISA R. NLRHS-09/10 RODGERS, ANNETTE 800 N BEECH BLDG 5 APT 28 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 753-4856 908 E 57TH PL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM FOURTH YEAR RODGERS, BEVERLY G. 835-6640 7016 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODE LEM FOURTH YEAR RODGERS, JANET L. 945-9415 2102 EDMOND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 GLENVIEW PARENT/HOMEWORCKE NTER AIDE RODGERS, LEONA M. 758-1593 444 MCCAIN BLVD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT ROGERS, CHRISTY C. 224-0153 1415 SHACKLEFORD RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 CRESTWOOD KINDERGARTEN ROGERS, JANET L. 2102 EDMOND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL ROGERS, MALA J. 834-4814 NLRHS-09/10 ROGERS, MELANIE 666-5483 #1 TRENT JONES COVE SHERWOODA R ENGLISH II, 1/2 ACT. DIRECTOR LYNCH DRIVE A. 700 NORTH CEDAR SL KINDERGARTEN ROLAND, ANGELA D. LITTLE ROCK AR 432-5266 RT 1, BOX 141 PERRYVILLE AR NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR RORIE, BEVERLY R. 227-7148 205 SPRINGWOOD ADMN. OFFICE SPEECH THERAPIST EARLY ROSE, CAROL ANN LITTLE ROCK AR CHILDHOOD 72116 72205 72126 72211 834-1645 7216 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODM IDDLE READING 7, CCVE 7/8 ROSS, TRACY L. 945-0539 4406 ATKINS ROSE CITY MUSIC 58 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 110 PARKVIEW DR. RUDKIN, BERT 771-0326 CENTRAL ELEM RUDKIN, BERT 771-0326 CENTRAL ELEM RUGGLES, CAROLL. CROSSING GUARD 110 PARKVIEW DR LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 758-0215 3518 LOCH LANE LAKEWOODM IDDLE READING RUSCH, CINDY LYNN 329-0879 1803 INDEPENDENCE GLENVIEW THIRD YEAR CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CONWAY, AR 72032 RYAN, JACKIE 834-0421 NLRHS-11 / 12 SADLER, TONY J. 7700 NO HILLS, #607 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLISH rv, CHEERLEADER, SR CABINET 945-5726 2112 EDMOND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT SAIN, JOYCE DENISE 663-3816 4519 W 27TH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 BOONE PARK PRE-SCHOOL CENTER AIDE SALLIS, ROSEANNE 835-0476 20 OAKBROOK SHERWOOD, AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 ATHLETICS, PE II, HEALTH, VOLLEYBALL SALTMARSH, JEANIE M. 834-0598 117 LAGRUE SHERWOODA R 72116 CRESTWOOD FIRST YEAR SANDEFUR, RANDY H. 758-9114 3521 N. WILLOW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 RIDGEROAD ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT SANDRIDGE, KENDAL W. 376-0609 1612 SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 ALT CENTER CUSTODIAN SARTIN, LOU ANN 945-1575 13 QUILLEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY GUIDANCE SECRETARY SARTIN, MALYNDA C. 945-9315 9 SANDLEFOOT COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOWP ARK SECRETARY SATTERFIELD, MARSHAL. 834-8626 1507 COOLHURST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CAFE. OFFICE NUTRITION COORDINATOR SATTERFIELD, PAM 758-1747 5801 LOCUST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW PARENT/HOMEWORKCE NTER AIDE SAWYER, LYNN 758-7099 CRESTWOOD SCHILB, CYNTHIA 834-7450 AMBOY 3748 LOCH LN CROSSING GUARD B. 2221 E MARYLAND FIFTH 59 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOODA R 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT SCHNARR, LORETTA K. CITY ZIP 771-1680 7018 EQUITY LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-09/10 SPECIAL EDUCATION (RESOURCE) SCHOLL, JANG. 835-9771 7005 INCAS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-11/12 SPANISH II, III, DEPT. CHAIR. SCOGGINS, IRA T. 945-3605 P.O. BOX 17451 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NLRHS-09/10 CCE I, CCE LAB, RES ENGLISH, #13/12 SCOGINS, ELLENS. 961-9335 P.O. BOX 11 SCOTT AR 72142 MEADOWP ARK SIXTH YEAR SCOTT, CURTIS EDWARD 661-9483 P.O. BOX 931 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 ROSE CITY MATH 8, DEPT CHAIR SCOTT, JERALINE 835-5200 7016 JACKSONVILLE HWY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SCOTT, JOYCE M. 771-1192 5705 BLUEBELL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT SCOTT, MARCIA T. 791-2102 431 MCCAIN APT RC-P14 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY SIXTH YEAR SCOTT, MARILYN M. 2215 BLACKWOOD ENGLISH I LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NLRHS-09/10 SCOTT, PAUL D. 791-2102 ADMN. OFFICE 431 MCCAIN RCP14 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CHAPTER I PARENT COORDINATOR SCROGGINS, EULA 374-4724 1503 N. ALLEN BOONE PARK LEAD CUSTODIAN SEALES, BARBARA 371-0033 2220 W. LONG 17TH BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SEALES, BARBARA 371-0033 2220 W. LONG 17TH BOONE PARK CROSSING GUARD SEIDL, CATHERINE 821-2238 1011 WHISPERING PINE RD INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN SELF, LINDA A. 834-0266 #7 ARBOR OAKS DR NORTH HEIGHTS FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS SERBOUSEK, MARY 753-5031 374 GOSHEN BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE SERIO, SHARON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72210 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 13111 W. MARKHAM#4 1 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ALT CENTER GUIDANCE COUNSELOR *20(.80)/38(.20) 60 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT M. CITY ZIP SETTLES, DORIS 771-14 76 605 WEST 55TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS SETZLER, NANCY J. PARENT/HOMEWORKCE NTER AIDE 834-0543 1409 WEWOKA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL ELEM FOURTH YEAR SHADLE, ANNE P. 835-8864 8700 MERRYMEN SHERWOODA R . 72120 REDWOOD MEDIA SPECIALIST *49/45 SHAUNFIELD, SUSAN A. 835-5477 1605 WEWOKA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE 31(.70) 49(.30) SHEEHAN, NANCY 666-2177 4812 CLUB RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 RIDGEROAD ENGLISH 8 SHEFFIELD, KELLIE L. 758-4092 67 KINGS RIVER RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD MATH 7, CHEERLEADING 8, ALG I SHELTON, PAULE. 568-9916 6716 VERBENA LITTLE ROCK AR RIDGEROAD SOCIAL STUDIES SHEPPARD, KATHYE. 753-5579 127 W. \"F\" BUS DRIVER SHEPPARD, KATHY E. 753-5579 127 WEST \"F\" INDIAN HILLS SHERROD, HARRIETT LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 834-7253 6205 PAWNEE DR. CENTRAL ELEM SECOND YEAR SHIELDS, .ADIE LEE 375-3360 BLDG 6, APT 43 SHT GDNS BUS AIDE SHOEMAKER, PATRICIA A. NO LITTLE ROCK, NO LITTLE ROCK, NO LITTLE ROCK NO LITTLE ROCK 868-5620 #53 MAYWOODY .ANOR LITTLE ROCK AR PIKE VIEW SPEECH THERAPIST/MR/LO SHORT, ANNA F. 945-7617 NLRHS-09/10 SHUFFIELD, MARY 758-4797 APT. 88, PROTHO MANOR CUSTODIAN E. 2405 N. BERKLEY BELWOOD SHUFFIELD, 771-0149 WAREHOUSE MEDIA CLERK (*45/43 ROBERT D. SICKS, LARRY A. 4402 WESTRIDGE DR MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN 279-9147 28 SHERWOODL OOP BUS DRIVER SICKS, LARRY A. RESOURCE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE NO LITTLE SEARCY AR 279-9147 28 SHERWOODL OOP. SEARCY AR RIDGEROAD MATH 7, PRE-ALGEBRA 7-8, MATH 8 61 ROCK ROCK ROCK 72209 A 72116 A 72116 AR 72116 AR 72114 72212 AR 72117 AR 72118 AR 72116 72143 72143 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT SIEGEL, PATRICIAN. 834-2982 1712 WAR EAGLE CITY BOONE PARK PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY SIEMS, LINN L. 945-1637 P.O. BOX 17091 AD.MN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL SIFFORD, DEBORAH K. 771-4124 5901 JFK #3201 LAKEWOODE LEM KINDERGARTEN SIKES, MELANIE K. 771-2008 1507 GARLAND AVE BOONE PARK SECOND YEAR SIMMONS, SUE H. 753-3959 44 DESOTO CRESTWOOD FIFTH YEAR SIMS, REATHA M. 374-3097 1208 E. 17TH CENTRAL ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SIREK, CATHY F. 753-9216 5200 SUMMERTREEC T SB22 BELWOOD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT SISCO, CAROL G. 834-7543 108 FORK RIVER RD SEVENTH STREET FOURTH YEAR SLATON, PHYLLIS R. 565-4014 #4 GLENMERE DR PIKE VIEW THIRD YEAR SLATTERY, LESLIE D. 834-5641 58 DOVE CREEK CR CRESTWOOD MR/LD RESOURCE SLATTON, THOMAS W. 835-1912 3107 SEMINOLE TRAIL NLRHS-09/10 BIOLOGY SLATTON, THOMAS W. 835-1912 3107 SEMINOLE TRAIL SMART, ANNE 945-5024 GLENVIEW SMITH, ANDREW 945-7911 T. ADMN. OFFICE SMITH, ANITA J. 666-1042 CENTRAL ELEM SMITH, ANNE D. BUS DRIVER 519 MIDDLE ST FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 128 1/2 DAVIS ST. LEAD CUSTODIAN 7513 APACHE KINDERGARTEN ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72112 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NLRHS-09/10 SMITH, BILLY J. 753-2439 2401 LAKEVIEW RD APT P-4 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SPECIAL ED., CHEERLEADING, DRILL TEAM 203 SHAMROCK .. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AD.MN. OFFICE ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN 62 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT SMITH, BILLY RAY 758-2318 1700 MAGNOLIA ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER SMITH, CAROLYN M. 753-7439 P.O. BOX 4022 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 KEYBOARDING SMITH, DEBRA K. 835-6963 5009 RIXEY RD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER SMITH, E. GRANT 771-2439 5201 FAIRWAY #12 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NLRHS-09/10 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL-SEC SMITH, ELIZABETH A. 835-4156 14928 HWY 107 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 RIDGEROAD NURSE SMITH, FRANK J. 945-7567 801 GREENLEA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOW PARK LEAD CUSTODIAN SMITH, GLORIA A. 753-4940 801 VALERIE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR-SPECIAL EDUCATION SMITH, HAZEL BOYD 372-2385 1855 IZARD LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 ROSE CITY GEOGRAPHY SMITH, JAMES H. 945-7809 704 ELLEN DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOW PARK CUSTODIAN SMITH, JAMES R. 835-3036 8328 WINDSOR VALLEY DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS SMITH, JERRY L. 374-0837 2005 W. 20TH BUS DRIVER SMITH, KATHY H. 227-4346 6 COACHLIGHT DRIVE NLRHS-11 /12 ENG. IV, JV CHEERLEADERS SMITH, MARY ANN 374-6866 108 E 14TH RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT SMITH, PATRICIA A. 835-3429 2905 SALLISAW DR PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR SMITH, PEGGY A. 835-3036 PIKE VIEW SMITH, ROBERT 771-4046 P. SMITH, SAMMYE L. 8328 WINDSOR VALLEY DR. FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS 4925 AUGUSTA CR., APT F BUS DRIVER 843-1089 1307 EAST MAIN PARK HILL FIRST YEAR 63 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CABOT AR 72023 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION SMITH, SHEILA A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 834-1127 1004 CHEPSTOWL ANE SHERWOODA R 72116 NLRHS-11/12 P.E. I, II, ATHLETICS, HEALTH, GIRLS TRACK SMITH, SHERRY B. 771-1940 4420 GREENWAY NO LITTLE ROCK RIDGEROAD ENGLISH, SCHOOL NEWSPAPER SMITH, SHERYLL D. 851-4896 8005 MARCHE LATERAL RD. NO LITTLE ROCK CENTRAL ELEM ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY *38/41 SMITH, VIRGINIA L. 753-2439 203 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-ASST. SUPT. INSTRUCTION SNEED, BETTY M. 329-9230 31 KENSINGTOND RIVE CONWAYA R NLRHS-11/12 SNIDER, MARGIE A. AM. HISTORY, WORLD HISTORY 835-7507 40 JACKSON OAKS NO LITTLE ROCK NLRHS-09/10 PHYSICAL SCIENCE, PRIN. TECH. SNOWDEN, DANA K. 228-7036 2500 VANCOUVERD RIVE PARK HILL PRINCIPAL-ELEMENTARY SOCIA, ALLISON C. 221-2827 4121 SCOTT SALEM #2L SEVENTH STREET EARLY MORNING AIDE SOCIA, ALLISON C. 221-2827 4121 SCOTT SALEM #21 SEVENTH STREET SECOND YEAR SOTO, DONNA G. LITTLE ROCK AR BENTON AR BENTON AR AR AR AR AR 72116 72118 72118 72032 72120 72204 72015 72015 2000 PARKWAY, APT #203 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT SOUTHARD, COURTNAY A. 778-2539 322 5TH STREET BENTON AR 72015 CENTRAL ELEM FIRST YEAR SOUTHERLAND, DORIS J. 945-7318 4126 BAUCUM NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PARK HILL LEAD CUSTODIAN SPENCER, DEBORAH M. 821-2316 23701 KANIS RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINER SPIVEY, JEANNE S. 835-7147 7704 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 ALT CENTER ENGLISH 7-12 SPRADLIN, ROY H. 227-7500 17 NOB HILL COVE LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NLRHS-11/12 COMP. SCI., COMP PROG II, DEPT CHAIR SPRUIELL, EUVELLE 378-0814 1417 W. 12TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 AMBOY CUSTODIAN ST. CLAIR, OPAL MARGARET 753-9822 719 W. 34TH NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT 64 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT STACEY, QUINZELLA 945-8120 101 HEMLOCK CT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD EARLY MORNING AIDE STACEY, QUINZELLA 945-8120 101 HEMLOCK CT. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE STAFFORD, KIMBERLY S. 771-2854 917 NICOLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET FIRST/SECOND YEARS STAGGS, NOVA N. 835-9191 7817 OAKRIDGE SHERWOOD AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR OF LANGUAGE ARTS STANBERY, DANA L. 753-8964 2400 MCCAIN, #1018-3 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE ASSISTANT STANDLEY, MILDRED M. 851-2549 6321 SUNSET TRAIL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NLRHS-11/12 ENGLISH III, ENGLISH IV STANFIELD, JOYCE L. 945-4386 3900 MCCAIN PRK DR,B9A257 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW SIXTH YEAR STARK, HAROLD D 753-4374 NLRHS-11 / 12 STARKS, LESLIE 753-3219 5901 JFK, #2931 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 COORDINATED CAREER EDUCATION, ART/CRAFT PARK HILL STATEN, LYNN 225-1825 A. 1408 W. 58TH KINDERGARTEN #9 CEDAR BRANCH CT ADMN. OFFICE SPEECH THERAPIST STEADMAN, VICKI L. 758-5774 1517 CRESTWOOD NORTH HEIGHTS THIRD YEAR STEMPLE, JENNIFER J. 758-2289 5412 WALNUT RD. LYNCH DRIVE SECOND YEAR NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 STEWART, JOG. 753-1674 ADMN. OFFICE STEWART, LINDA 904 SKYLINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 COORDINATOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/MEDIA 03/43 794-1004 ADMN. OFFICE STEWART, SCOTTY ROSE CITY P. 7558 CARRIE DR BENTON AR EARLY CHILDHOOD - SPEECH THERAPIST 1504 E 2ND NO LITTLE BA AIDE STEWART, TAMMY R. 376-4177 1612 MAGNOLIA NO LITTLE NLRHS-11/ 12 CUSTODIAN STEWART, WALTER EUGENE 3100 N. MAIN NO LITTLE CENTRAL ELEM CUSTODIAN 65 72015 ROCK AR 72114 ROCK AR 72114 ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT STINSON, MARGARETE. CITY ZIP 376-2573 1316 NANNETTE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK SECRETARY STOKES, PHYLLIS B. 758-9630 5704 SORENSON, APT. C NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, SPECIAL SERVICES STOLL, SANDRA S. 771-0577 3404 BUNKER HILL INDIAN HILLS SECOND YEAR STONE, GEORGIA ANN 835-5277 2201 SEMINOLE TRAIL ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY STORY, ARCLISTA J. 666-1059 6218 BRENTWOOD ROSE CITY ELEM SIXTH YEAR STOUGH, ELIZABETH T. 758-3341 5004 RANDOLPH CRESTWOOD FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS STOVALL, PAUL B. 4908 STRATFORD NLRHS-11/ 12 STRAWN, JEAN M. 945-3687 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL-SEC ROSE CITY STURCH, RONDA J. 100 GARNER RD O.H. AIDE 758-2626 917 W 47 ST NORTH HEIGHTS EARLY MORNING AIDE SUMLER, JACQUELINE W. 796-8503 #7 YOUNG LANE BARING CROSS OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST SUTTERFIELD, LAGATHA 835-5971 3 CARDINAL VALLEY RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION SWEEDEN, PATRICIA E. 968-3251 RT. 7, BOX 56 GLENVIEW FIFTH YEAR SWEERE, KATHI L. 336-8833 2450 KRYSTAL KREEK LYNCH DRIVE EARLY MORNING AIDE SWEERE, KATHI L. 336-8833 2450 KRYSTAL KREEK LYNCH DRIVE THIRD YEAR TABOR, SUSAN 753-2922 2100 BLACK RIVER SEVENTH STREET SIXTH YEAR TACKETT, DANA L. RD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 VILONIA AR 72173 *30/48 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72120 RUSSELLVILLE, AR 72801 CONWAYA R 72032 CONWAYA R 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 758-5392 709 SKYLINE DR LAKEWOODM IDDLE EARTH SCIENCE, NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 VOLLEYBALL/TRACK COACH TALLEY, ALLAM. 376-4348 ALT CENTER 1523 W 15TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 FOOD SERVICE MANAGER 66 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT TALLEY, JOHNNY JR. CITY ZIP 664-6173 5 HUGHES CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 ALT CENTER ATHLETICS, SAC MGR *12 (.33)/20 (.67), TRACK TATE, JOHN P. 758-9751 NLRHS-09/10 TAYLOR, CHESTER 945-0425 2109 ORANGE PHYSICAL SCIENCE TAYLOR, DOROTHY 758-8381 NORTH HEIGHTS TAYLOR, ELLA L. 110 EMILY ST. BUS DRIVER A. 609 PAULA DR. LUNCH PERIOD 945-9266 4609 BOYER AIDE ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE MANAGER TAYLOR, EVELYN Y. 375-6837 2106 MULDROW ADMN. OFFICE HIPPY PARAPROFESSIONAL TAYLOR, GWENDOLYNF . 758-0672 2502 S. BERKLEY DR. BUS DRIVER TAYLOR, JAY L. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 771-2063 2600 JOHN ASHLEY DR G211 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 BUS DRIVER TAYLOR, ..ARY C. 758-2335 4524 PURNELL DR. NLRHS-11/12 GUIDANCE COUNSELOR TAYLOR, RONALD O. 376-7703 3254 BATTERY BUS DRIVER TEAGUE, JENNIFER L. 834-4227 8404 EASY ST. NLRHS-09/10 ALG. I, INT. ALG. TENNER, MARGARET D. 374-7842 128 MELROSE CR BUS DRIVER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 TERRY, NORA J. 753-3207 CAFE. OFFICE THIBAULT, BETTY 753-8317 139 EASTGATE FOOD SERVICE JO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ASSISTANT-SUBSTITUTE PIKE VIEW THOMAS, BRYAN K. 400 LATONA LANE SECRETARY 945-1650 4501 HAYWOOD RID\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"suc_jad_901","title":"Photograph, [Clarendon County, S.C.) 1992, of Mattie De Laine","collection_id":"suc_jad","collection_title":"Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine Papers ca. 1918-2000","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Clarendon County, 33.66581, -80.2164"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":["Photo [Claredon County, S.C.] of Mrs. (Mattie) De Laine at her former home; Mrs. De Laine ca. 1992, 1056 Prescott Rd. Lived here as a young woman written on reverse."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Legal size - 13439 - (Folder 30)","Joseph A. DeLaine Papers"],"dcterms_subject":["De Laine, Mattie Belton--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Photograph, [Clarendon County, S.C.) 1992, of Mattie De Laine"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.tcl.sc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/jad/id/901"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For more information contact the South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_jad_jad901","title":"Photograph, [Clarendon County, S.C.] 1992, of Mattie DeLaine","collection_id":"suc_jad","collection_title":"Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine Papers ca. 1918-2000","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":["Photograph taken in 1992 of Mrs. Mattie DeLaine at the home where she lived as a young woman.","\"Mrs. DeLaine ca. 1992, 1056 Prescott Rd.  Lived here as a young woman\"--verso photograph.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine papers, ca. 1918-2000."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Legal size - 13439 - (Folder 30), Joseph Armstrong DeLaine papers, ca. 1918-2000,  South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbus, South Carolina."],"dcterms_subject":["African American women--South Carolina","Civil rights workers--South Carolina","African American civil rights workers--South Carolina","Dwellings--South Carolina"],"dcterms_title":["Photograph, [Clarendon County, S.C.] 1992, of Mattie DeLaine"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.tcl.sc.edu/digital/collection/jad/id/901"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["photographs"],"dcterms_extent":["image/jpg","Images"],"dlg_subject_personal":["De Laine, Mattie Belton, 1907-1999","De Laine, Mattie Belton, 1907-1999--Homes and haunts"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_683","title":"Program budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/1994"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Program budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/683"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nfiled COURT . 4STFRN OlSTpirx Arkansas i JAN 21-1992 tfc' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT'\"''f EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ay. S55NTS. CLERK . OEP CLi IK I fl Si  4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER On November 14, 1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit remanded the cause to the Court to review the parties' proposed modifications [May submissions] to the 1989 plans. 1 Little Rock. School District, et al., Nos. 91-2640EA, 91- 2648EA, 91-2655EA, 91-2683EA, slip op. (8 th Cir. November 14, 1991). In response to the order of the Eighth Circuit, the Court scheduled a hearing to begin on December 18, 1991. It informed the parties involved that, prior to reviewing their proposed modifications, it would ask the Pulaski County Special School District [PCSSD] to report on its financial situation and hear a ^The three school districts involved, Little Rock School District [LRSD], Pulaski County Special School District [PCSSD], and North Little Rock School District [NLRSD], and the Joshua Intervenors submitted proposed modifications to the settlement plan approved by the Eighth Circuit in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District Ro. 1, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990).report from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring on the budgetary- processes for desegregation expenditures which are employed by the three school districts involved in the matter. The Court determined that before it could consider proposed modifications to the settlement plans, it needed to learn whether there are district budgetary processes in place which will enable the Court to monitor the implementation of the plans. At the conclusion of the second day of the hearing, the Court expressed concern about its ability to effectively monitor the settlement plan without budgets that reflect the three school districts' intentions, goals. and priorities regarding their desegregation efforts. The Court specifically mentioned the state of the Little Rock School District's [LRSD] budgetary process. In its opinion approving the settlement plans of the three districts, the Eighth Circuit noted the parties have committed to \"solemn undertakings\" and stated: We accept these undertakings, again with the reminder that compliance with them will be closely monitored. If the District Court becomes convinced in the future that money is being wasted, and that desegregation obligations contained in the settlement plans are being flouted, it will be fully authorized to take appropriate remedial action. Little Rock School District V. Pulaski County Special School District Ro. 1, 921 F.2d 1371, 1390 (Sth Cir. 1990). The Eighth Circuit further directed the Court to \"monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and agreement, -2-and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require.\" Id. at 1394. The Court monitors the use of settlement monies through the Office of Desegregation Monitoring [ODM] . In October 1991, the ODM informed the LRSD that it must be able to provide the Court with information which (1) accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. a [Document # 1517] Pursuant to the directives from and the considerable latitude and discretion given the Court by the Eighth Circuit, the Court finds that the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites and that it is necessary for the LRSD to submit 2 revised cost figures to the Court. Therefore, (1) The LRSD must submit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan and which are reflected on updated implementation timelines contained in the plan. 2 In a note to its May submissions, the LRSD indicated that the cost figures originally submitted with its desegregation plan were outdated and it would provide revised cost figures in a separate desegregation budget. To date, the Court is unaware of any such revised figures having been submitted or filed. -3-a (2) The LRSD must submit a long-range budget projection on per annum basis which covers all anticipated desegregation expenditures over the entire term of the desegregation agreement. (3) The LRSD must submit.a long-range revenue projection covering the same period of time, which includes revenues anticipated not only from the settlement monies and settlement loan, but also from state and millage revenues and any other money sources. This long-term projection will provide a clear picture of the district's financial future and, thereby, enable the LRSD to predict with accuracy if and when a millage increase will be needed. The amount and time of any anticipated millage increase is to be indicated along with the date when the district will present a millage increase to the voters. (4) The LRSD has maintained that a significant portion of desegregation expenditures are \"start up.\" The district must specifically identify which desegregation costs are \"start up\" and when these start up costs will terminate. (5) The revised budget shall be prepared in consultation with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and shall be submitted to the Court within thirty (30) days after the Court rules either from the bench or in a written order on the proposed modifications. \" By this Order, the Court confirms its oral approval of the construction of the interdistrict school at the Crystal Hill site. Further, the Court confirms oral instructions made to the parties to explore alternative sites for the construction of King -4-Interdistrict School along the 1-630 corridor. c^/^^ay DATED this of January, 1992. 'id., \"ONITED stated DIsTRZCT J 'R2CT JUDGE iPLi.\nheet in I FRCP ON -5- r/y/t. IT* Garland. 3615 W. 25th Uttle Rock. AR 72204 Incentive ' Mr. Robert L. Brown. Jr.. Principal ' , Phone: (501) 671-6275 'Simpli/ Transformational\" ,\n! jii  Ltjj Jii lip fC i hi Ann Brown, Director Office of Desegregation 201 E. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 I 1994 O'fics of Desegrogai iV: u-inofing iipril pitfsj\nt Dear Mrs. Brown: The enclosed documents are being sent to inform the Court of discrepancies in the LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT. Seventeen pages of entries documenting the efforts or performance towards the strategies were not included on the printed document. Although my response may not be accurate, I view the exclusion as retaliatory. I suspect other incidents which have occurred since my testimony to be retaliatory as well. Consider the following: Carla Miranda, an instructional aide, received a new classroom assignment when she returned to work from a medical leave on January 31, 1994. On February 2, 1994, at approximately 1:00 p.m., Larry Robertson and Brady Gadberry came to my building to investigate alleged charges of discrimination against a handicapped person. They were sent by Estelle Matthis. When I asked Estelle why she was circumventing the Policy and Procedures guidelines, she said she was trying to avoid serious problems with the 504 Law. When I emphasized the \"Due Process\" procedures, clause in the contract agreements, she told me you have to use common sense for some things. I told her that I was obligated to follow LRSD PoUcy and insist upon my staff doing the same. On February for a MACDUO Powerbook. , 1994, I received a copy of a P.O. Requisition Attached to the requisition was two 1987 directives written by Vance Jones, focused on the USE OF SCHOOL EQUIPMENT. The directives The second directive listed the consequences for personal use: suspensionwith a possible recommendation for termination. I consulted Mr. Neal and was informed that he customarily sends those directives to principals who purchase laptops. A list of principals was requested but not returned in his response. The principals with laptops were located and stated that they never received the \"Vance Jones\" directives from Mr. Neal. The Parent Council monitored my building on the 22nd of February. Ms. Dazzle Mattison, a former teacher who was terminated last school year, served as the chairman of a two man team. According to some staff members, she badgered them during the interview process. She found many areas of non compliance in three of the five classrooms visited. have never received such a negative report. When I called the LRSD Desegregation Office to see who made the decision to send her to Garland, I received an evasive response. Now we have a Program Budget Document, which really doesn't address the issue of a needed budget process, being doctored to reveal only favorable efforts by selected schools. If you would like to have a copy of the documents referred to in the letter, please let me know and I will send them to you. You will find enclosed a copy of those entries not credited to Garland or not entered into the document shared with the Court of Friday, February 25, 1994. Dr. Williams is scheduled to meet with the local practitioners of Garland Incentive School on Tuesday, March 1, 1994. A staff member made the suggestion that a member of your team attend the meeting. If that can be arranged, we would appreciate the involvement of your office, meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in Garland's cafeteria. The I Thank you for your interest and support for the incentive schools. Respectfully, Robert L. Brown, Jr.Pngm S^q ft 52 Pzogra Saaa: Inceotiva School Operations: Prograa Coda: Pragraa Goel: Plan Rafeceaca Page Bnabar 180 L 180 LRSD PTf 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMEfTT Peer Tutoring/Retlred Teacher Mentor , Prlaazy Teeder\nC. Russell Mayo, Jr. nefiiiwlery Leaiter\nBvi*iaa Data\nArae Bart 2 February 25, 1994 To develop sn^^iort pEugraae aad pcocadiiraa which will allow 4w. to prorida eBihanrad edocatiaaal for lU 2.0 3.0 Objectiwea Strataglee Beginning Date Ci^letloa Data aapoBBlhllity Svalnatloe To netsMlsh training for paar tstore aad an pear tutoring prograa for snslepts. -ro 2.1 Tea iMia and stodaata will raeelve training in peer tutoring. \u0026amp; Bdal will ba pot in place, coonselor will eupatvina the proceas. A peer-tutoring aodel Is developed In the counselors prograas. The 07/01/93 06/30/94 Staff. Deval., Aaet. Snpts., Cooc. of Inosatlva sctoolB To naa the of retired teerher aeators to tntor and SpCOSCir 3.1 Mentors will volunteer or may be paid a stipend. They will provide extra support to students and suppleoent teacher worK. (Office of Dasag., Ed. Prograas, VIPS, Counselors, Teachers) 2.0 (All students will inprove acadeaically on teacher made tests and Abacus assessnant by assisting peers in various subject areas.) 2.1 (Copy of training nodal, schedule of training, naaes of teachers) 2.1 (Observing the pear tutoring training nodal and process to datemine aCfactlvanass) 3.0 (Through the support of retired teacher oentors, students In sponsored clubs will gain acadealc support and show iBproveaent in classroan related subject areas, on quarterly report cards to parents and Abacus assessnant.)Progran Seq 45 Page: Progran Haise: Foreign Language Prograa Revision Date: Pabruary 25, 1994 Prograa Code:  Prioary Leader: C. Rusaell Prograa Mayo, Jr. Secondary Leader: Ama Bart Goal: The Intent education of for the aU acadenic students prograoB, la instructional the Incentive Schools.] netbodologies or extended and day. instructional Appropriate teebnology staff to will bo proaote bired. excellence la Plan Page Beference Rumber Objectives Strategies Beginning Dato Coopletlo n Date Responsibil Evaluation Criteria B. Evaluate software DUltlaedla package usage. bilingual for I. software Evaluate for foreign use language Lab classrooa In Mnltioedia Hultiaedia PCPage: Pregran Sq : 41 Revision Date: Fabnucy 25, 1994 Program Raoa: Office of laeenclve Schools Program Coda: 51 Primary loader: Sacoodary Laadar: PTograa Goal: Esrabllsb aa Incaariva School Plaa Page Reference Nofflber loplaaaatatloa oe Zacaatlvi Offici School that Program. will sarvi to assist baildlag priaclpals aad staff la uadarstaadlag aad Objactivas Strategies Boglanlag Data Coaipletio a Date Rosponslbll Svaluatioa Criteria B. Thi School meetings la 1.1 1.2 (To principal not of aware Garland of the Jan 1994 A. or agenda facilitate caaBBUnicatioa eoBn\u0026amp;ittaas Schools.) la mantlonad efforts with July 1993 1, June 1994 30, tba Incentive (Assoc. Supt. of 1.2 (Dates and A. Sent meeting members. letters with and Parent scheduled Council Oct. 1993 28, Oeseg., Pareats, Conlttae Neabara, Daseg Facilitator ) Monthly meetings will ba held. agendas coBBtittae hold) of aeetlngs 57^LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Paga: 2 Pngxaa 8^ fi 42 Ravlsica Data: Febnary 25, 1994 Pzogna Baaa: writing to Raad Laba Prograa Code: 52 Priaary Leader: C. Rassell Mayo, Jr. Secondary Loader: Ama Hart Prugrae Goal: The intent of the acadeaic pzogrsaa, laatructloaal aatbodolagisa and use of instractlCBal tochnology ia the XacoBtlve Schools la to prwta stndsDts la tba inceDtive for all L Plan Refamoe Pago uabox 152 ObjoetiToa Stratagiaa Bei^lBiilng Data Cc^lotioa Data neapnia1h\u0026lt;llty B SvaloatixB Criteria 1.2 (To augaent the acadeaic prograa) with spacial stodents aetivltleo sad social stems bonding progrsB to noot tbo cognitive eccisl, eootional, and istoraot noods of stadOBts. (An instructional technology prograa, such as Writing to Read, will be iopleaented at each Incentive School for K-2 students. (K-l) A.- Labs were installed in every school. Coapleted, 1991-92 school year loot B. Oa-golag salateoaBce provided for upkeep of labs. c. Materials aod supplies to nalntaio and enhance the Writing to Read lab needed. Joly 1, 1993 Jono 30, 1994 1991-92 SSI (Assoc. Supt. for Curt., Asst. Supt., Deseg Facilitator, Instructional Technology Dept., Instructional Aides, Principal, Teachers) (Prograa exists in all Incentive Schools)Pag*: 3 Pzogm Sq *: 48 Bvrisloa Data: February 25, 1994 Prograa Baaa: Field Tripe Prograa Coda: 59 Priaary Loader: C. Russell Haye, Jr. SaoDodary '^nartiir: Ama Bare Prograa Coal: daralop sup|HuX progrssa and pcooedarea Mdcta will allow iaoeatlTa schools to prorida adncaticaial opportonltii tta all stadasts. L Plan Bafereoca Page Boabar 180\u0026gt;181 ttrjactlvaa Strategies Beginning Data Coapletloa Data naspTWiBl.Mlity KralaatloB Critarla (Ceasnnity aceass/flald trips are to ba arranged for (relnforcament or earlchaeat) for stndsBts. (Visits to historical, scientific and cultural events and exhibits within the city aad around the state and region with appropriate chaperons to provide educational input.) A. Cosanwlty access field trips are taken each month or as needed. Ccsitpletioa: 5% B. CK^Hunity access for field trips that ocenr on Sundays for parfoEBing groups at Carland are being proridad by the transpartatloB iliniii, t sent of the Pulaski County Spacial School District. Joly 1, 1993 JnzM 30, 1994 (Principals and staff, VIPS, parents) (Review relationship of field trips to subject area taught and students* educational, social and enotlonal needs and detemlne the effectiveness through iBproveaent in ciassrooB perfonaance, Abacus assessBant and teacher-Bads tests.) Dee 12, 1993 Dec. 19, 1993 Jan. 1, 1994Fxuyxw Soq *: 54 Progm Kaaias Exteadad Year Pragra Coda: 65 Prograe Goal: Plan Rafarance Page Himber L 172 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Prlaacj Leader: C. Ruaaall Mayo, Jr. To develop anpport pngrana aad procadnraa which will allow iacanaiva achoola to prowida ttijactivaa Strategiea Page: 2 Bvl*laa Date: Pabrnary 25, 1994 Secondary ^nartnr: Begiimiag Date Atm Hart opportnnitiaa tar atedanta. CiiiieLluu Date Daapnnalbllltj Svalaation Critazla (To develop a program for year round school including enrichment and remediation options.) (Sunmar segments in remediation/enrichment prescriptiona Cor courses to be taken. (The Students Education Plan (SEP) and parent and staff input determines the course offerings.) Transportation may ba provided.) Suflner School BBrichaant and raaadial courses ware offered and completed at Rockefeller and Franklin School. Completion: 1004 A. Propaad plan Cor Year-Round Education at Garland will be presented for study/approval during the 1993-94 school year. Joly 1, 1993 Joly 1, 1993 Jima 30, 1994 Aug., 1993 Ed. Prograam Coardinator of laoaatlva Schools (VIPS Volunteer Cor Incentive Schools, Oesag. Facilitator, Transportation/ Cafeteria Director, Asst. Supt., Principals, Teachers, Parents) (Annual Saner School Report will indicate ImproveBant in student participation and behavior on sumar school reports to parents.) 61^Page: 3 Prograa Seq : 55 Revision Date: February 25, 1994 Program Raina: RecogolcioB Prograns Program Code: 66 Primary Leader: C. Russell Secondary Leader: Ama Bart Mayo, Jr. Program Goal: To develop Cor all ) support students. programs and procedures which will allow incentlvi schools to providi enhanced educational opportunities Plan Page ReCerence Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completio n Date Rasponslbil ity Evaluation Criteria A. Cor Monthly students awards assemblies school to accomplishments. are recognize held at each students' Completion: 45% B. Teachers student' Bobcat each Rids will month Club. nominate Cor the one C. whan Parents their recognized identiCied will child (based ba has notlCied been on criteria). 6Prograa Seq #: 56 Prograa Raaa: Incantlva School Oparations Caap Pfeifer Program Coda: * Primary Leader: C. Russell Mayo, Jr. Secondary Laadar: Prograa Goal: To develop for all \u0026gt; support studants. programs and procedures which will allow incentlvi schools to provldt Plan Reference Page Ruaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completlo n Data 12.2 Work with Director to target incentive students. July 1993 1, June 1994 The aeslstant superintendents are beginning and principals student 30, identification. B. include Attempts have bean made to candidates C.. students Garland designated receive present 12.3 at for has as services cycle. Work with Paga: Revision Dana: Arma Bart enhanced 3 February educational Responsibil tty 25, 1994 opportunitins Evaluation 12.2 students Incentivi (The who for th: Criteria number in schools saleeted program) of Caap not Garland Pfeifer, been school during other as Dec. 1993 13. to the groups projects. to undertake coBBiunlty similar July 1993 June 1994 30. 12.3 (Bvldonc involvwBant in of other projects.) (.nPrograa Seq : 60 Program Naoe: Extended Week Prograa Code: Program Goal: To reassess Individual school LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: C. Russell Hayo, Jr. Secondary Leader: Revision Date: Aroa Bart 2 Pobruary 25, 1994 policies and procedures they relati to meeting the needs of all students. Plan Page Reference Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coopletio n Date Responslbll ity Evaluation Criteria 188 2.0 for Areas possible to be investigated plan inclusion. (Saturday programs. developed level needs based and students These but field enrichaent Programs the on the will building interests to programs enhance will be educational of learning. Include shall not ba limited to: July 1993 1, June 1994 30, Assoc. Supts., Asst. Snpts. (Principals , teachers, parents) 1.0 (School coomunity (input meabers of the from school snabers cooeninity) the (An increase number of in students participating Saturday 1.1 in Prograa.) (Students activities, make-take, trips, enrichaent tutoring, book . fairs. parent PE educational will be growth evidenced by improveaeot Abacus and on assessment teacher-made tests.) A. Saturday scheduled ' suggested weekly programs activities. and are include 1.2 provided attending Transportation will be for B. for children extended day. Transportation students provided activities as is needed. provided Transportation if the result is Extended not Week opportunities performances. for in SundayPzograa Saq *: 63 Program Baae: Teacher TTtlpani1r/Tnai-rlce Progm Code: 74 Progm Goal: Plan Reference Page 9aBber Page 194 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Prieary Leader: C. Ruaaall Mayo, Jr. Secondary : ID pznrUa qoallt, staff dmlnpMiir aipuliaKie. n that staff ii il is ata prsfiaiad to aeUan Isesatlsa Setsaol ji-___ Objactiane Stratagiae Begimiiag Data C^^letloe Data Page: 2 BarlaXoa Data: Arma Bart February 25, 1994 to aoccenafully lapleeant piiaji ana and cnrriculne. naacaiaHilliry RealnaTlm Criteria 1.0 (Additional inservice training for staff will be provided prior to the start of school, or when appropriate, based on staff needs.) Joly 1, 1993 June 30, 1994 (Director of staff Development, Principals, Teachers, staff Development Comlttee, IRC Specialist, Asst. Supt., Controller) 1.0 (TMchar knowledge of programs and curriculum will increase as evidenced by positive feedback on Inservice evaluations and clasarocm monitoring reports.) 1.1 InosBtlve school teacbers will report back to work five days earlier for inaarrice (training]. (Appropriate inservice training will be provided needed.) Teacbers reported to work early to develop themes following the 1992-93 school year. 1.2 (Teachers will receive separate stipends (for returning to work ahaml of schedule.) A. Teacbers who reported to work received stipends. 1.3 Monday has been set aside for teacher inservices throughout the school year. B. Inservice stipends for teachers reduced from $30,000.00 during the 1993-93 school year to $11,189.38 for the 1993-94 school year. c. COE plans for identified staff inservice needs are being met under a revision in staff development plans without paying teachers a stipend due to the unexplained budget decrease. Joly 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Sep. 10, 1993 Jone 30, 1994 Jan 30, 1994 (Director of Staff Development, Principals, Teachers, Staff Development Committee, IRC Specialist, Aset. Supt., Controller) (Director of Staff Development, Principals, Teachers, Staff Development Committee, IRC Specialist, Asst. Supt., Controller) 1.1 (Agenda and dates of staff inservice\nteacher sign-ins) 1.2 (DoeuDentatlon of stipends received) (a5'~\u0026gt;Progm Soq *x 63 Pag.\n3 Pregm Waeas Taar^iaf S^ponds/ZosazTlca SairlBica Dates Pabruary 2S, 1994 Pxuyxaa Codas 74 Priaary laadar\nC. Puasall Maye, Jr. Prograa Goal: laaMtar: TO proTlda qoaUtr :ff dmlofmo nzporioocoo Oat .taff _mi m i\u0026gt;ni|ar.d to kU... Incmln Arna Bart aclMiol goal, ual to nccaaamUT \u0026lt;Wlnt ptogm and corricolna. Plan Bafaraaea Paga BiiBter Objactivaa Stratagii aagiwwing Data Coaplatloa Data BaapfaialTh^^ttj Braloatloa Czltaria D. Tha raductloB Ib tba allocatioo of fUBds for iBBarvlca tralBlBg w\u0026lt;n result 1b tba scbools Inability to fully ioplaaant the staff devalopaant e\u0026lt;Mponnr of tba school inprovenent plan. PxijyiOB Saq *s 64 Pnigcaa Baaa: IneantiTa Sehool Tbaaaa Prograa Coda: 75 Prograa Goal: Plan Rafereaca Page nabar L 153 LRSD FY 93-94 PROCRAM BUDGET POCVMEWT Priaarr Tander: C. Ruasall Mayo, Jr. Memndary Taadar\nPa9\u0026gt;: 2 RarlaioB Data: Atm Hart Fabruary 25, 1994 ? \"  -i' ltmeloil -thodologl- and lB,trncUo1 t-amology, I. to proot. 1B0.U.00. in tao.tK for U ratat. io (ttr}actlvaa Stratagiaa Beginning Data Cc^letloo Data neatiraialhtllty tba Incaotlva Kaalnatloa Crltarla 1.0 School thMoe will bo davmlopad (as a recruitment and educational vehicle to attract parents into the schools) at tba local bonding level by parents and staff sod are zeco^aendad to be Integrated Into tba total corricoliiB. Jaly 1, 1993 Jnaa 30, 1994 (Principal, staff, Desegregation Facilitator, Associate Sept, of Curr., Asst. Supts.) 1.0 (laproved racial aaki up of atudaats. Thaaos are fully developed at every school.) 11 (Principals and staff will survey parents and determine interest for theme selection.} 1.1 (Feedback froa eurvay) A. ' Parents were surveyed in 1992-93 school year. Conpletion: 100%. 1.2 (Themes will be selected from the highest response received by principals.) Jan. 17, 1993 1.2 (Tally of rasponses Indicated theme selection) A. Thenes were selected during the 1992- 93 school year. Completion: 100%. B. Theme specialists have been employed for all incentive schools. February 1993 C. No materials/supplies have been purchased to support the infusion of themes. Jan. 4, 1994 D. District level personnel ware not involved at the ground level of planning. E. A major component of the plan, determined as essential in recruitment efforts, has not received District level support\nplanning for extended year programming with flexible scheduling. GC\u0026gt;LRSD FY 93-94 PROCHAM BUDGET DOCUMENT 2 Picograa 70 BerlalaA Datat February 2S, 199* Ptotfcee Beae: Incentive ai-Hrwwi opantioae - Sapport Serricoe Prograa Code: Prieary Leader: Estelle Nettbis Seeondary Leader: C. Russell Maye, Jr./Anna Hart Prograa Coal: TO \u0026lt;1wlop fopport prograae aad proeednree wblcb *m allow iaesatlve scboola to provide eabancad adaeatiiaial opportnaltiee foe all atndanta. L Z. Plan Refereaee Page IubImu ISO-181 160-181 180-181 180-181 Objectives Strategli Beginning Data Coi^letioa Data Bee[ws\u0026gt;Bll\u0026gt;ll1,\u0026gt; J Svalnatlon Criteria 7.0 Cceenaity access/field tripe are to be arranged for (relnforceaeat or enrichaent) for stndeets. 8.0 To bn-i Id a prograa of cc^Bunity Involveaent provided for stadents with access to i arganinatlana and volunteer eocperlences. Joly 1, 1993 Joae 30, 1994 (Principals and staff, VIPS, parents) 7.0 (Review relationship of field trips to subject areas taught and students' educational, social and eaotlonal needs and detemlne the effectiveness through improvoBent in classroom performance and student achievenent on standardized tests) 7.1 Vlsita to bloterical, scientific and cultural eveots and oKbiblta within tbe city and around tbs state aad region with appropriate chaperons to provide educational input. A. Preaently, the LBSD provldee support If casBoniCy access uppnitnulties occur any day other than Sunday. B. I^Iaentaticm baa been poealble through the support of tbe Pulaahl County Special School District Transportation Department. 8.1 Sstabllsb Girl/Bay Scout Prograas at each school. 6?^ Joly 1, 1993 Joly 1, 1993 Joly 1, 1993 JOM 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Jone 30, 1994 vipa, Bdncatloaal PtiMjLsas, Curriealua Deaegregatian (Parents, Teachers, Principal) Asst. Snpt., Coord, of Incentive Schools (VIPS) Quapaw Council, Asst. Snpt., Coordinator of Incentive Schools (Parent Coordinator of Incentive Schools) 7.1 (Copy of building level culalnatlng activities and corresponding field trips) 7.1 (Students will demonstrate mastery of stated objectives of subject areas as related to field trips on teacher-made tests and Abacus assessment) 8.0 (An increase in the number of students who participate in consBunlty organizations will be evident) 8.1 (Copy of program and participants and community activities) 8.1 (An increase in the number of students who will participate in scouts in each school)Prograa Seq 72 Prograa Naoa: School Policies and Procedures Prograa Cede: Prograa Goal: To reassess individual school LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis policies and procedures as they DOCUMENT Secondary Leader: relate to oeeting the needs Page: Revision Date: C. Russell of all 2 February Mayo, students. 25, Jr./Ama 1994 Bart Plan Page Reference Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date L 188 L 188 L 188 188 1.0 To prograsBlng incentive complies establish a flexible approach school at Coarpletlo n Date Respqnslbll Ity Evaluation Criteria also needs. with which each July 1993 June 1994 30, Principal Staff 1.0 neets standards individual and student student (Increased on teacher tests, achievement made Abacus 1.1 (or. Allow other for team assessments, classroom observation standardized strategy} scheduling. effective by means teaching teaching of July 1993 June 1994 30, (Principal Staff) team the or 1.2 for classes periods Provide students for to opportunities for as romain extended needed. in time July 1993 June 1994 30, (Principal Staff) 1.3 Develop individualized a plan for within the instructions specific building. July 1991 June 1994 30, (Principal Staff) 1.4 for flexible addressed Local extended Practioners' year adainistration. scheduling by LRSD school must plan with be Jan. 1993 17, and tests) (Evidence teaching building other teaching 1.2 nuober of at level affective strategy) (Increase of participating extended Saturday Extended Programs) teachers plans in students in day, or Year (ClassrooB and Education include strategies lesson student's Individualized instruction Plan specific and will the needs 70^ children) of to E all meetPaga: Program Saq #s 72 Ravision Data: Fabrxiary 25, 1994 Prograa Naoa: School Pollclas aad Procedures Prograa Coda: Primary Leader: Estella Matthia Secondary Leader: C. Bussell Hayo, Jr./Arma Bart Prograa Goal: To reassess Individual school policies and procedures they relate to oaetlng the needs of all students. Plan Page Reference Number Objactives Strategies Beginning Data Ccopletlo n Date Rasponslbil Ity Evaluation Criteria L 188 L 188 188 L 188 L 188 L 188 2.0 for Areas to be possible plan investigated Inclusion. July 1993 June 1994 30, Assoc. Supts., Asst. Supts. 2.0 (Final recoBBseadations from the school 2.1 Permanent substitute school needed. 2.2 At to in be least assistant the 2.3 A. assignad each Incentive available one-half principal. RecoBendation LRSD Board Uniforms Uniforms required climate efforts. 2.4 as time to and Standard teachers. 2.S Encouraged denied (at least of for need Directors. students to be by July 1993 July 1993 July 1993 June 1994 30, (Assoc. Supts., Asst. Supts.) 1, June 1994 June 1994 30, 30, enhance recruitment school two dress PTA for attendance (Principal Asst. Supt.) Assoc. Supts., Asst., Supts. caaoBittae available) 2.1 (Job description and filled) 2.2 ari written position (Staffing reflective Businass of Casa recoBBandations) 2.3 (Students parents idea \u0026lt; of evidenced results) 2.3 racial (An occur) and support uniforms the as by survey acceptable balance will year for for (2) staff) parents/all meetings meetings per July 1993 July 1993 June 1994 June 1994 30, 30, (Parents, Principal, Staff) (Principal, Staff) 2.4 (Teachers participate establishing dress code building) 2.5 of will in In each (Documentation parent participation PTA reflect Beatings In will the number 7/ S of parents attending)Program Seq *: 72 Page: Program Name: School Policies Revision Date: Fabruary 25, 199 aad Procedures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthls Secondary Leader: C. Russell Mayo, Jr./Arma Bart Program Goal: To reassess Individual sehool policies and procedures as they relate to meeting th needs of all students. Plan Page Reference Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completlo n Data L 188 Responsibil ity Evaluation Criteria 2.6 Student available individual handbooks in every that will school school. be aad July 1993 June 1994 30, (Principal, Staff) 2.6 Bandbooks {Student used to parents about will inform Informed sehool programs, and bo {3.0 to I \u0026gt; To provide staff.) compensation regarding children) procedures policies their (3.1 will Additional be given teachers/prlncipals to compensation who extra incentive periods of time at work the A. at on school.} Teachers are an hourly rate educational experience ranging $12,000.00 with from B. compensated of hours pay and based salaries $6,000.00 per year. to Principals compensated receiving a have equitably, standard yet to be of $2,200.00 stipend per year. July 1993 1, June 1994 30, (3.1 records) Payroll\u0026lt;\u0026gt;F-. d RECEIVSn MAR 8 1994 Office of Desegregaiion Mcniicring TO: Mr. Larry Robertson, Assistant Superintendent FROmT^V^Robert L. Brown, Jr., Principal DATE: March 4, 1994 SUBJ.: Results of Personal Investigation in Program Budget Document Censorship Please be advised Mr. Sterling Ingram is responsible for censoring the input from Garland's Program Budget Document. At this time, I am asking you to secure for me the \"legitimate\" reason(s) for his authorization of this school's document. If at all possible, I would appreciate a response before my meeting with Dr. Mayo. If you are able to attend that meeting, March 9, 1994 at 3:30 p.m., I would like for you to be present. Thank you for your help. cc: Sterling Ingram Estelle Matthis Dr. Henry Williams Ann Brown John WalkerI. n. m. IV. V. VI. vn. PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT WORKSHOP Welcome 5, 1994 and September 6, 1994 AGENDA Introduction/Purpose Background and History WordPerfect and PBD Examples Questions and Answers Adjournment tf [-s'?'4^ 7^ 7 '*4' 1 -tii*  OCT 0uiC3 oi Robert Glowers Bill Mooney Robert Glowers Robert Glowers 51994 litorii tPROGBUD.DOC DISKETTE 9 THERE IS A METHOD TO THE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT PROCESS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Planning, Research and EvaluationLittle Rock School District Planning and Budgeting Process Program Planing and Budgeting Process Manual (Gray Book) Project Management Tool Monthly Court Submission The Tool Program Budget Document Quarterly Report (Rainbow Book)  Task analysis of the Program Planning and Budgeting Document (Gray Book)  Program achievements  Identifies when activities are scheduled and completed I . Quarterly Expenditures  Forces communication among departments because the tasks are interrelated1 Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Time Line MAY JUN JLY AUG SEP Prog. Inventory I T I OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I I I Prog. Evaluation Needs Assessment Goals Prog. Devel. I I I I I I I I Budgeting I I I I Monitoring \u0026amp; Reporting I I I I I I I I I Reassessment of Planning Process \u0026amp; Organization I I I I I Lidie Rock School District AUG I I JLY R. Mayo Fiscal Year 1994-95 QUARTERLY REPORTING ACHIEVEMENTS First Quarter 07-01-94/09-30-94 Accomplishments, efforts performance toward strategies Diskettes Due: 10-14-94 Placed under Strategies column Returned: 11-21-94 PROGRAM Alphabet precedes each achievement COMPLETION DATE Documents when an achievement is completed, in the format MM/DD/YY Give approximate, educated guess for percent of completion for achievements started but not finished. Give actual date upon 100% completion. BUDGET DOCUMENT PROCESS BEGINNING DATE Every achievement should have a corresponding Beginning Date Documented in format MM/DD/YY Documents when an achievement beginsPBD MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY DIRECTIONS: Fill in the blanks with the correct word(s). 1. The Program Budget Document provides planning information about_____________ information about the programs. and 2. The Program Budget Document diskettes are reported at intervals or periods. 3. _______________________ are efforts, tasks, evidence, performance, or actions undertaken which contribute to the accomplishment of the strategy. 4. If an achievement or activity toward the accomplishment of a strategy has been started but not completed during a reporting period, then a of completion should be entered in the \"Completion Date column. ir 5. Each achievement should have corresponding ______________ date information and________ date information or a percent indication for the date.DISKETTE FLOW INFORMATION Completed Diskettes Returned to: Incentive Schools Principals Sterling Ingram Elementary Schools Principals Margaret Gremillion Sadie Mitchell Secondary Schools Principals Robert Glowers Primary Leaders, Secondary Leaders, Program Managers Robert Glowers IInstructions For Entering Data Into The Progbudl.Doc Step 1 - Press rhe F5 key. Step 2 - Type a\nand press ENTER Step 3 - Press the DOWN ARROW key to move the cursor and the red highlight bar down. Progbud. 1 must be highlighted in red. Step 4 - Type 1 for Retrieve. The table will load onto the screen. Step 5 - Use the ARROW keys to move the cursor under the 'P\" in Program Name. Step 6 - Press the TAB key once. This will move the cursor under the \"S\" in School Operations. With your cursor under the \"S' type your school name, comma, and the press space bar once. The spacing will automatically adjust. Step 7 - Press the TAB key six (6) times and type your principal's name. Step 8 - Press the PAGE DOWN key once to move to the second page. This is the beginning of the table. Step 9 - Use the DOWN ARROW key to move into the table. Press the TAB key two (2) times to move to the Strategies column (column 3). Step 10 - Press the ALT key and the DOWN ARROW key together - 3 times. The cursor will move under the in 1.2 in the Strategies column (column 3). You are now ready to insert rows for the achievements corresponding to strategy 1.1. Step 11 - Press the ALT key and the F7 key together. You are now in the Table Edit screen.Page 2 Step 12 - Press the INSERT key. Type 1 for rows. Type in the number of rows you need to insert and press ENTER. To figure out the number of rows look to see how many achievements there are for the first strategy and insert one row for each achievement. For example, if you have two (2) achievements for the first strategy you will insert two (2) rows. . Step 13 - Press F7 to exit the Table Edit screen. Step 14 - Type the achievements for that strategy using the following format with A. being the achievement for 1.1. Strategies eginnino Date Cospletion Date 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to anaure sufficient sifiport for students and staff success and for the iapleaantation of the desegregation plan. 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial coaaiittees to aonitor iapleaamtation and data. (Report to faculty) A. School Biracitl Conmittee established (July 1, 1993) July 1, 1993 09/13/93 (June 30, 1994) 30, 1994 09/16/93 1.2 A district-wide biracial coaittee will laonitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) July 1, 1993 30, 1994Page 3 Step 15 - You are ready to type the Beginning Date and the Completion Date. Step Step Step 16 - Press the TAB key once and type the Beginning Date. 17 - Press the TAB key once and type the Completion Date. 18- Press the TAB key five (5) times. This will move the cursor to column 3 in the Strategies column. You are ready to type in the next achievement. Step 19 - Before starting on the next achievement you will need to save your work. Press FIO to save. Type in a\nand your document name - then press ENTER. This name can be Budget 1 or your school name, although, you will only be allowed to use eight characters. Step 20 - Repeat steps 10 through 18. Please note that in Step 10 you will move the cursor to the next Plan Reference and Page Number in column 1 that matches the strategy for your next achievement. Step 21 - Continue in this manner until you have entered all achievements. Step 22 - To Exit WordPerfect press F7. Then you will answer Y (yes) or N (no) to save: document name will appear - press ENTER: Y (yes) or N (no) to replace: Y (yes) or N (no) to exit WP51. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Text will wrap around when typing within a column. When retrieving your document you can look at the date the document was saved to decide which document you worked on last. It is a safe practice to save about every 15 minutes. To do this press FIO then press ENTER, press Y. If something goes wrong with the document simply exit without saving. Do this by pressing F7 and type N for No.ADDING ROWS AT THE END OF A TABLE This should only be used when you have reached the double lines at the end or the bottom of a table and there is no space available to type text. BE SURE TO READ THE DIRECTIONS AND MESSAGES ON THE SCREEN WHILE FOLLOWING THESE STEPS. Step 1 - Press the ALT key and the F7 key together. This will open the table edit screen. Step 2 - Press the HOME key twice then the DOAVN ARROW key. The cursor will move to the last cell in the table. Step 3 - Type 1 for SIZE. Step 4 - Type 1 for ROWS. Step 5 - The current number of rows in the table will appear on the screen. Type the new size of your table. For example, the number of rows is currently 23 and you need three (3) more rows - type 26 (23  3  26) and press ENTER Step 6 - Press F7 to exit the table edit screen. Step 7 - Move the cursor to the column you need to type in and type your text.How To Move The Cursor In A Table In Document Screen Use the Following Key Strokes In Edit Screen Use the Following Key Strokes To get to the Edit Screen [Ait} 4- (F7 Q + Q One Cell Down Qor (Alt} + Q Shift) 4. [Tati) or (Ait} + Q One Cell Left Q or Shift + or + Q Tati) or (AjD +  One Cell Right Qor (Tati) or Sl + Q +  One Cell Up CD or Home), [Home). (Home). (^ First Cell In A Row Home). (Home). (^ or Home I, (Home). (Home). Q Last Cell in A Row Home End) I, (Home). [^ or Last Cell in the Table Specific Cell + (EED Cell Location (e.g., Al) To exit the Edit Screen 11} 4-CURSOR CONTROL Character left Character right Line up Line down I I Commind Card Basic WordPerfect Features DELETE TEXT/CODES Character left of cursor BACKSPACE Character at cursor Word at cursor Word Left Word Right Left end of line Right end of line CTRL \u0026lt;- CTRL HOME HOME \u0026lt; HOME HOME - or END Characten right of cursor to end of line Characters right of cursor to end of P*g Sentence, paragraph, page Block DEL CTRL  BACKSPACE DELETE EOL (CTRL . END) DELETE EOP (CTRL  PGDN) CTRL  F4 Undelete Block text DEL. Y n, 1 Left end of tcreen Right end of screen Top of JCToen Bonom of screen HOME. - HOME,-* HOME. * or - (numeric keypad) HO.stE. i or + (numeric keypad) Top of current page Bonom of current page Top of page number Top of previous page Top of next page CTRL  HOME. T CTRL  HOME, i CTRL  HOME. pagenu/nber PGUP PGDN Beginning of document HOME HOME, I HOME HOME i End of doctimeoi SAVE DOCUMENT And Remain in Document 1. Flo 2. Enter filename 3. Y/N (if resaving) And Clear the Screen 1. F7.Y 2. Enter filename 3. Y/N (if resaving) 4. N And Exit WordPerfect 1. F7,Y 2. Enter filename 3. YZN (if resaving) 4. Y BLOCK TEXT/CODES 1. Cursor on first character 1. ALTF4 3. Cunor on last character RETRIEVE DOCUTvfENT Directly 1. SKUTAFIO 1, Enter filename From Lbt Files 1. F5. Enter drive/directory 2. Highlight file, 1 PRINT Text from Screen 1. Position curscr 2. SK!rT-F7 3. 1 for full document. 2 for page Block from Screen 1. Block text 2. SHIFT * F7. Y Document from Disk 1. SHIFT + F7.3 1. Enter document name 3. Enter range of pages Document from Li.ct Files (Disk) 1. F5. enter directory 2. Highlight file, 4 3, Enter range of pagesC.aocei Print Job 1. SJOFr .FT, 4, 1 2. Enter print job number CENTER (OR FLUSH RIGHT) 1. Poiidon cursor 2. SHIFT  P6 (or ALT * PS) UNDERLINE (OR BOLD) While Typing 1. Pl (or PS) 2. Typo text 3. FI (or PS) Existing Text 1. Block text 2. Pl (orP6) CHANGE LINE SPACING 1. Posidon cunor 2. SHIFT  FR, 1, 6 3. Enter apacing, FT RESET MARGINS Left/rtgiit 1, Posidoa cunor 2, SHIFT * Pl, 1,7 3. Enter margdni, FT Top/bottom 1. Pondoncunor 1. SHnT*PI.2,5 3. Enter margin*. F7 RESET TABS 1. Poiidon cunor 2. 3. 4. SHIFT. PI, 1.8 Cle*rT*b() Set Ub(), FT. F7 SEARCH TEXT/CODES 1. Posidon cunor. Fl 2. Type learch icing. Fl REPLACE TEXT/CODES 1. Poiidon cunor 2, AJJT * Fl, Y/N for confirmation 3. Type eared itiing, F2 4. Type replace icing. Fl INSERT HEADERS (OR FOOTERS) I. Poiidon cunor it top of page 2. SHIFT  PS, 2.3 (or 4) 3. Select I or 2 for type of header (or footer) 4. Select frequency 5. Type the text, FT, F7 INSERT PAGE NUMBERS 1. Poiidon cunor at top of page 2, SHIFT * Pl, 2, 7 3. Select page number poiidon, FT MOVE(ORCOPY) Sentence, Paragraph, Psge 1. Posidon cunor 2. CTRL. F4, 1 or 2 or 3 3. I(ot2) 4. Posidoa cunor, ENTER Block of Text 1. Block text 2. CTRL.F*, 1 3. I(or2) 4. Poiidon cunor, ENTER CHECK SPELLING 1. Posidoa cunor o 3. CTRL . Pl, 1 4. 1 for word, 2 for page, 3 for document 5. Respond to menu opdona USE THESAURUS 1, Poiidon cunor on word 2. loaen Tbeiaiirui (floppy diik users) 3. ALT.n 4. Respond to menu opdona WoniPwiocx w * of WordPwriwcl CotporwonPRINT SHIFT F7 print text 4 t2SBlE __ _ ________________ \\ Name Port 1 HP LaserJet IID 2 LPTl: 3 Sheet Feeder None 4 - Cartridges/Fonts/Print Wheels 5 Initial Base Font Courier lOcpi 6 Path for Downloadable Fonts and Printer Command Files I  7 - Print to Hardware Port No / S Selection: 0 Selec Printer: Cartridges/Fonts/Print Wheels 'it Category Quantity Available Built-In Ca: idges Soft Fonts 2 350 K 0 350 K NOTE: Most fonts listed under the Font Category (with the exception of Built-In are optional and must be purchased separately from your dealer or manufacturer. If you have fonts not listed, they may be supported on an additional printer diskette. For more information call WP at (801) 225-5000. If soft fonts are marked you must run the Initialize Printer option in WP each time you turn on your printer. Doing so deletes all soft fonts in printer memory and downloads those marked with If soft fonts are not located in the same directory as your printer files, y must specify a Path for Downloadable Fonts in the Select Printer: Edit menu\". you 1 Select\n2 Change Quantity\nN Name search: 1TERM MANAGEMENT TOOL PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT (PBD) ALLOCATIONS FORMULAS MINIMUM FOUNDATION PERFORMANCE AID (MFPA) CARRY-OVER FISCAL-YEAR GOALS OBJECTIVE PROGRAM PROGRAM DESCRIPTION PROGRAM GOAL ACHIEVEMENTS PROGRAM NAME LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Planning Budget Process Glossary MEANING A listing of annual tasks to be done related to Planning and Budgeting. Tasks appear listed by task, completion percentage, start date, finish date, and person(s) responsible. A listing of all legal obligations of LRSD divided by program areas. Obligations appear listed by reference, obligation, activities, start and finish dates, person(s) responsible, and evidence criteria for the completion of activities. At one time this was known as the \"Rainbow Document\" because it was printed on paper of many colors. Mathematical formulas used to determine how resources are allocated. Technical term. Refers to part of the monies the district receives toward per- pupil expenditure. The amount of money not spent by LRSD when the budget is closed for a given fiscal year. The beginning month period during which spending on the new budget begins and ends our fiscal year is July 1-June 30. If only one year appears with the word \"fiscal\" or \"FY\" in a document, it is the last year of that budget. For example, fiscal year 1995-96 may be expressed as FY 96. A broad expression of one purpose of LRSD. A specific, measurable expression of something to be achieved within a stated time period. A program is an established plan of operation, composed of a group or series of related activities which are carried out to serve a specific area of identified need. (PBD) A program description includes a purpose, scope and content, and participants/beneficiaries related to the respective program. (PBD) A program goal is a broad guiding statement and should describe the overall aim(s), purpose(s), or ambition(s) of the specific program. (PBD) Achievements are efforts, tasks, evidence, performance, or actions undertaken in a program which contributes to the accomplishment of the strategy. Achievements are placed in alpha order underneath the relative strategy. (PBD) To eliminate confusion, an established name for each program has been assigned by the district planner. (PBD)OBJECTIVES Program objectives present explicitly the desired impact the program should have on a problem. They should provide detail to the goals. (PBD) STRATEGIES Strategies are the jobs, tasks, efforts, or actions undertaken in a program which contributes to the accomplishment of the objective. (PBD) PRIMARY LEADER The Primary Leader is the council\\cabinet level associate responsible for the management and operation of the respective program. (PBD) SECONDARY LEADER The Secondary Leader is the associate who is back-up to the Primary and will function in that capacity in the absence of the Primary (i.e. the Program Manager or the Principal). (PBD) DISTRICT GOAL SUPPORT Each program directly supports at least one district goal. If more than one district goal is relative, then the appropriate district goals have been listed in descending priority order. (PBD) BEGINNING DATE This is the actual date a particular strategy began. For consistency, all dates should be printed in the following manner\nMM/DD/YY, (09/30/93). (PBD) COMPLETION DATE This is the actual date a particular objective or strategy was completed. For consistency, all dates should be entered in the following format: MM/DD/YY, (09/30/93). If an activity toward a strategy has been started but not completed, a percent of completion (75 %) should be entered. (PBD) RESPONSIBILITY This is the name of the individual(s) tasked with ensuring an activity has been accomplished. (PBD)Program Seq #: 27 Program Name: Educational Equity Monitoring Program Code\n22 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 224 LRSD FY 94-95 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: {To provide information to determine the level of educational equity for all students to coordinate the planning and budgeting process.) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: Or. Robert Glowers Responsibility October 3, 1994 Evaluation Criteria 1. To cortduct semi-annual Educational Equity Monitoring visits with the assistance of the local school biracial committees. (1.0 Completed semi-annual report of findings in the thirteen (13) monitoring categories.) (1.1 Develop appropriate surveys, designs, checldists and other reporting forms for monitoring process.) (1.2 Selection of local team members.) (1.3 Conduct training of local team members, as needed.) 107-01-94) (07-01-94) (07-01-94) (06-30-95) (06-30-95) (06-30-95) Director, Planning, Research end Evaluation Principals Director. Planning, Research and Evaluation (1.1 Copies of completed documents.) (1.2 List of local team members.) (1.3 Agenda of completed training session and list of team members who received training.)Program Seq #: 27 Program Name: Educational Equity Monitoring Page: 3 Revision Date: October 3, 1994 Program Code: 22 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Dr. Robert Glowers Program Goal: (To provide information to determine the level of educational equity for all students to coordinate the planning and budgeting process.) Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (1.5 Establish monitoring schedule.) (1.6 Conduct site visits.) (07-01-94) (07-01-94) (06-30-95) (06-30-95) Director, Planning, Research and Evaluation Director, Planning, Research and Evaluation (1.5 Completed monitoring schedule for all schools.) (1.6 Completed composite report for each visit.)LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Planning, Research and Evaluation Evaluation of the Seminar on PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Please help us evaluate this seminar by responding to the items below. Circle the number which best express your reaction to each of the items. Space for additional comments has been provided. 1. The objectives of the seminar were: Clearly evident 5 4 3 2 1 Vague 2. The organization of the seminar was: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 3, How effective was the presenter(s): Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 5. Was the presentation effective: Adequate 5 4 3 2 1 Inadequate 6. The information gained should prove: Beneficial 5 4 3 2 1 Not Beneficial 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor What additional information would have been advantageous to you: Comments:CORR25 Date: September 2, 1993 To: Estelle Matthis Sterling Ingram Dennis Glasgow Larry Robertson Margaret Gremillion Brady Gadberry Arma Hart Jeanette Wagner Mark Milhollen Jerry Malone From: Bill Mooney Subj: Completion of the Program Budget Documents Sterling and I have been working on some documentation to support the Program Budget Document, and we think this will help you in your task of loading your initial program data. If you will look at these two documents prior to loading your data, you should have far fewer problems. Attached is a document entitled \"LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT TERM AND DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS.\" This document provides some basic definitions you will need as you work with both the desegregation programs and the non-desegregation programs in the next phase of the project. It also provides a description of every data element field on both pages of the Program Budget Document (PBD), including what should go into those fields. The diskette is built using WordPerfect. You will find three files on the diskette\nINSTRUCT, PROGBUD.DOC, and TABLE JRM. File INSTRUCT contains a complete set of typing and formatting instructions for your clerical staff. This file should be read before opening the other two. If you run into problems, please ask for help. It is very important that you pass on this information to all program people who will be working with the PBD. If you have questions, let us know. The PBD you are creating today will be used for quarterly reporting for the rest of the year. Therefore, maximum happiness will result from maximum communication and understanding. CONCPT04 REVISED 02 SEP 93 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT TERM AND DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS TERM DEFINITIONS. The following definitions are provided for general guidance, and will be used throughout the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. Program. A program is an established plan of operation, composed of a group or series of related activities which are carried out to serve a specific area of identified need. A program is a major undertaking by the district to fulfill statutory, executive, and/or legal reguirements. methods of implementing goals and objectives. Programs are the district's Programs will be a basis for work progress and fiscal reporting and monitoring. Program Description. Generally, program descriptions do not currently exist on most programs, and will have to be written, program description should include at least three parts: A - Purpose. A one or two sentence statement of what the program is designed to accomplish. Scope and Content. A general description of the activities that are to be undertaken to achieve the purpose. description program. This of section might also include the administrative - Participants/Beneficiaries. a brief structure of the A specific statement of how many and what kind of persons will be affected by the program during one fiscal year. Program Goal. A program goal is a broad guiding statement and should describe the overall aim(s), purpose(s), or ambition(s) of the specific program. It is a general and enduring statement of purpose that expresses the district's fundamental intentions and provides guidelines for planning the future development of the program. What is the program trying to accomplish? must have at least one goal, but may have several. Each program Objectives. Program objectives present explicitly the desired impact the program should have on a problem. detail to the goals. They should provide They tell in specific, measurable terms what is to be accomplished to implement adopted goals. The objective statement should: (A) tell what is to be achieved\n(B) tell when the achievement is to be realized\n(C) tell how the achievement of the objective will be measured. least one objective, but may have several. Each program goal must have at Strategies. Strategies are the jobs. tasks. efforts. oractions undertaken in a program which accomplishment of the objective. contributes to the A strategy is a combination of intermediate steps, and produces a distinct end product intermediate processes which only support other strategies. - not These end products should be measurable or quantifiable where possible, showing how the objective is to be achieved. have at least one strategy, but may have several. Each objective must Evaluation Criteria. Evaluation criteria are statements which specify the end product of an objective or strategy and establish measurable levels of performance for the product. These end products should be measurable or quantifiable where possible. showing how the objective or strategy is to be achieved. The criteria should measure, if possible, the relative impact of the results on the problem which the objective or strategy is designed to solve. If a strategy or objective cannot be measured in terms of impact, the measurement can be stated in terms of the level (or volume) of strategy provided and/or the number of persons served. Each strategy must have at least one evaluation criteria, but may have several.PROGRAM PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Page. Each program will have one of these cover pages. Extensive program narrative will carry-over onto a second page. The form is set up on diskette to allow for this carry-over, so you do not have to get everything on one page. Program Seq #. Each program will be sequence number by the district planner. assigned a unique The purpose of this sequence number is to establish a reference for placing programs in order within the planning document. When the document is assembled, programs are arranged in this sequence. The program sequence number will help facilitate look-up since there is no front-to-back page numbering. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year. Revision Date. document was last changed. This date is the actual date this program This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed. this date will change at As a minimum, performance reporting. least quarterly with the regular Program Name. The district planner established name of the program in this field. will place the Name consistency will eliminate confusion, so try to use the designated name on all documents. change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit should not Program Code. This is a unique accounting code which will link budget and expenditures to the associated program. The code will be assigned by Financial Services prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, and all expenditures during the year should use this program code. should not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit Primary Leader. The Primary Leader is the cabinet-level associate responsible for the management and operation of this program. This person should have the authority to ensure all necessary actions are taken to make the program successful. This person is responsible for the correctness and timeliness of the planning document and all subsequent reporting. Secondary Leader. The Secondary Leader is the associate who is back-up to the Primary, and will function in that capacity in the absence of the Primary. Program Description. above, must be placed in this field. The program description, as defined This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year. District Goal Support. Each program must directly support oneor more district goals. If more than one district goal, the appropriate district goals should be listed in descending priority- order. District goals will be established by the Board. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year. Program Goal. placed in this field. but may have several. The program goal, as defined above, must be sequentially. Each program must have at least one goal. Each goal should be numbered and listed not change during the year. This element should be a static field\nit should Plan Reference. Specific plan and page references will be listed in this section for those programs directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. L= InterDistrict Plan. LRSD Desegregation Plan. The format should be L23 or 113-20. 1= This element will be left blank if the program is not directly cited in one of the desegregation plans. This element should be a static field\nit should not change during the year, unless by Court Order. FY Program Budget. The total budgeted dollars for the appropriate fiscal year will be shown in this element. The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beginning of the fiscal year, element will change only if the budget changes. This FTE. This element reflects the Full Time Equivalents (FTE) budgeted for this program (at the program code level). The number will be the total for the program code, and will be supplied by Financial Services at the beginning of the fiscal year, element will change only if the budget changes. This lst/2nd/3rd/4th Qtr Expend. The actual expenditures for each quarter will be entered into the appropriate field during the quarterly reporting process. Financial Services will provide the information, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. remain static unless an error is detected. Once entered, these fields should YTD Expenditures. actual expenditures at the program level. This field is the year-to-date total of This will include all departments with expenditures against this program. Financial Services will provide the information once each quarter is closed, but the Primary Leader is responsible for entering the information onto the form. unless an error is detected. Once entered, these fields should remain static Related Function Codes. This field identifies all function- level accounting codes which combine to make the complete program budget. Each program will have at least one function code, but may have several. with one space between them. Each four digit code should be listed sequentiallyOBJECTIVE PAGE DATA ELEMENTS DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS. Page. This is the relating to the the field. ft program\". sequential page number for all pages This number is automatically placed in Program Seq #. program page. This This should be the same number as on the number will link all objectives back to the major program. separate program Revision Date. document was last changed. This date is the actual date this program This date will be entered by the person making the change each time the document is changed. this date will change at As a minimum, least quarterly with the regular performance reporting. The date on this page may be different from that on the program page since this objective page should change more frequently. Program Name. page. This name This should be the same name as on the program is a further link back to the major program. Including the name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program name. Program Code. This should be the same code(s) as on the program page. This code(s) is a link back to the major program. Including the code(s) on this page prevents the need to refer back for the program code. Primary Leader. This should be the same person as on the program page. Including this name on this page prevents the need to refer back for the leader 's name. Secondary Leader. that name on the program page. This name will generally be the same as objectives, However, if a program has several supporting objectives. the Secondary Leader may be different for those Program Goal. program page in this field. Include only one of the program goals from the For each program goal listed on the program page, there will be at least one objective page. Plan Reference Page Number. listed for each objective and strategy. Source references should be If the objective or strategy is desegregation plan related, list the specific plan and page upon which this objective or strategy is found. If the objective or strategy is not related to a desegregation plan or Court Order, list whatever source was used. be numbered to correspond to the appropriate strategy. Each reference should Objectives. the program goal. List all of the objectives required to satisfy Objectives should be listed in bold face.Wording not taken from a desegregation plan or court order should be in bold face within parentheses. Each program goal must have at least one objective, but may have several. Spacing between objectives should allow for all supporting strategies. Objectives should be numbered sequentially under each goal. Strategies. the related objective. List all of the strategies required to satisfy Strategies should be listed in bold face. Wording not taken from a desegregation plan or court order should be in bold face within parentheses. Each objective must have at least one strategy, but may have several, numbered sequentially under each objective. Strategies should be Beginning Date. activity began. This is the actual date this particular For consistency, all dates should be entered in the following format\nMM/DD/YY, 07/22/93. stated yet, leave this field blank. If an activity has not Completion Date, activity was completed. entered in the following format\nThis is the actual date this particular For consistency, all dates should be MM/DD/YY, 07/22/93. If an activity has been started but not completed, give your best guess on the percent of completion (75%). started, leave this field blank. If the activity has not Responsibility. This is the name of the individual tasked with ensuring this activity is accomplished. Evaluation Criteria. List at least one evaluation criteria for each strategy. Include the specific measure of success. Evaluation criteria should be listed in bold face. Wording not taken from a desegregation plan or court order should be in bold face within parentheses. Each evaluation criteria should be numbered to correspond to the appropriate strategy, and should be numbered sequentially under each strategy.(7c: Program Description: Purpose: Scope and Content. In-depth Program Evaluation Format This comes from the program description in the Program Budget Document (PBD). The description may be expanded if necessary to better describe the program. A statement or succinct description of the purpose of the program A narrative of what the program encompasses Participants/Beneficiaries'. A description of who the participants and beneficiaries are of the program. A specific group of workers, a specific group of students\ngeneral description of participants or beneficiarieswhichever is more applicable. Program Goals: The program goal(s) taken from the PBD Evaluation Criteria: Evaluation criteria are listed on the far right side of the PBD. The evaluation criteria should be listed separately and numbered as part of the format of your evaluation. / Evaluation Results: The corresponding results of the evaluation criteria should be listed here. The evaluation results should be numbered to match the evaluation criteria listed above for easy reference. If no evaluation results are available for a corresponding evaluation criteria item as listed above, then no evaluation results should be so stated. Objective 1: This is the first objective from the PBD for the program being evaluated and should be restated. Following restatement of the first objective, relevant data results of findings from the evaluation results listed above should be presented here. Tables are also appropriately presented at this point to indicate the success of attainment of objective 1 with respect to the attainment of the appropriate program goal or goals. This section of the evaluation provides you with the opportunity to pull together the different evaluation results that indicate the success of objective 1. Discussion I: A discussion of objective 1. A statement of whether or not you met objective 1 based on conesponding criteria. That is, what can you say about your success in meeting objective 1 in terms of your evaluation criteria. Was/were the appropriate goal or goals met. It is at this point that you would pull together the various pieces of your evaluation results in order to holistically discuss the success of achievement of objective 1.2 Objective 2: Restatement of the second objective followed by relevant data results as described in the process above. Discussion 2: Restate the second objective. Discuss whether or not you met objective 2 based upon the evaluation criteria/results in terms of the program goal(s). Objective X: This process should continue until all objectives for your program have been listed and criteria appropriately dealt with. Discussion X: This process should continue until all objectives for your program have been dealt with in terms of meeting the objective in terms of the related program goal or goals. Obstacles to Goal Attainment:Below, please list the obstacles encountered. Use the conesponding objective number as listed in the PBD. Objective 1: Provide a succinct statement as to whether or not the objective was met in terms of its goals. If the objective was achieved, then state objective achieved. If the objective was not achieved, then state objective not achieved and indicate why the objective was not achieved in terms of your goal(s)\nexamples could include the lack of resources, inadequate personnel, lack of community interest, etc. Objective 2: As above Objective X: This process should continue until ail objectives have been dealt with in terms to relative to obstacles to goal attainment Recommendations: After evaluation of your program, recommendations are likely to be forth coming. These recommendations are recommended changes to the existing program. The new recommendations will entail several components. The new objectives listed for a particular recommendation are not to be confused with the objectives listed in the PBD which you have already evaluated. Essentially, you are now writing a new objective and component elements. Recommendation 1: A statement of what you recommend as a program change to the current program. Objective D. State the objective of the recommendation described above. Evaluation Criteria: State the new evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate the objective. Expected Benefits'. State the benefits to be experienced/expected by the District as a result of this recommendation were it to be implemented. eval_94.doc 11/11/943 Impact Analysis'. Describe the expected impact of the program. Refer to the Business Case format for additional detailed instructions. Resources Analysis'. Personnel analysis, financial analysis, expected costs, savings, etc. Refer to the Business Case format for additional detailed instructions. Force Field Analysis'. Who will be the primary supports of the recommendation\nwho will be the primary detractors of the recommendation. Refer to the Business Case format for additional detailed instructions. General Implementation Plan'. This includes the timelines, corresponding activities, and responsible persons for implementation of the recommendation. Refer to the Business Case format for additional detailed instructions. Recommendation 2: Follow above process Recommendation X: Follow above process for each additional recommendation. Please include the following wording at the end of your extended evaluation and indicate your recommendation and check-off one of the budgetary impact statements.  Business Case is recommended___yes___no  Plan modification is recommended___yes___no  Overall recommendations are likely to have what type of budgetary impact: No budgetary impact___ Increased costs___ Decreased costs eval_94.doc 11/11/94\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_657","title":"Program planning and budgeting process","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting process"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/657"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District Program Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process The purpose of this session is to: Help you understand how you can get what you need to do your job\n Clarify why the answer is NO to some of your requests at certain times of the year\n Explain why program evaluations, a Program Budget Document, etc. are necessary\nand.  Justify why we have a planning process and how we are all involved. We will need from you: Any questions you have as the presentation is made\n A careful understanding of the process when the presentation is complete\n Accurate and complete Program Budget Document information\nAccurate program evaluations\nand,  Properly formatted business cases. In its simplest form, the purpose of the Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process is to link what we should be doing as a school district with how we spend our money.filed oijTPiQj rniiDT JAN 211992 1: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT'^^*- EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION by\nS^NTS, clerk OEP. CLi IK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER On November 14, 1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit remanded the cause to the Court to review the parties' proposed modifications [May submissions] to the 1989 plans. Little Rock School District, et al., Nos. 91-2640EA, 91- 2648EA, 91-2655EA, 91-2683EA, slip op. (8 th Cir. November 14, 1 1991). I:  ' 5: I I K teifi  \u0026lt; In response to the order of the Eighth Circuit, the Court scheduled a hearing to begin on December 18, 1991. It informed the parties involved that. prior to reviewing their proposed modifications, it would ask the Pulaski County Special School District rpcsSD] to report on its financial situation and hear a ^The three school districts involved. Little Rock School District [LRSD], Pulaski County Special School District [PCSSD], and North Little Rock School District [NLRSD], and the Joshua Intervenors submitted proposed modifications to the settlement plan approved by the Eighth Circuit in Little Rock School District V. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990).report from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring on the budgetary processes for desegregation expenditures which are employed by the three school districts involved in the matter. The Court determined that before it could consider proposed modifications to the settlement plans, it needed to learn whether there are district budgetary processes in place which will enable the Court to monitor the implementation of the plans. At the conclusion of the second day of the hearing, the Court expressed concern about its ability to effectively monitor the settlement plan without budgets that reflect the three school districts' intentions, goals. and priorities regarding their desegregation efforts. The Court specifically mentioned the state of the Little Rock School District's [LRSD] budgetary process. In its opinion approving the settlement plans of the three districts, the Eighth Circuit noted the parties have committed to \"solemn undertakings\" and stated: We accept these undertakings, again with the reminder that compliance with them will be closely monitored. If the District Court becomes convinced in the future that money is being wasted, and that desegregation obligations contained in the settlement plans are being flouted, it will be fully authorized to take appropriate remedial action. Little Rock School District V. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371, 1390 (Sth Cir. 1990). The Eighth Circuit further directed the Court to \"monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and agreement. -2-and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require. Id. at 1394. The Court monitors the use of settlement monies through the Office of Desegregation Monitoring [ODM]. In October 1991, the ODM informed the LRSD that it must be able to provide the Court with information which (1) accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. a [Document # 1517] Pursuant to the directives from and the considerable latitude and discretion given the Court by the Eighth Circuit, the Court finds that the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites and that it is necessary for the LRSD to submit 2 revised cost figures to the Court. Therefore, (1) The LRSD must submit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan and which are reflected on updated implementation timelines contained in the plan. 2 In a note to its May submissions, the LRSD indicated that the cost figures originally submitted with its desegregation plan were outdated and it would provide revised cost figures in a separate desegregation budget. To date, the Court is unaware of any such revised figures having been submitted or filed. -3-a (2) The LRSD must submit a long-range budget projection on per annum basis which covers all anticipated desegregation expenditures over the entire term of the desegregation agreement. (3) The LRSD must submit.a long-range revenue projection covering the same period of time, which includes revenues anticipated not only from the settlement monies and settlement loan, but also from state and millage revenues and any other money sources. This long-term projection will provide a clear picture of the district's financial future and, thereby, enable the LRSD to predict with accuracy if and when a millage increase will be needed. The amount and time of any anticipated millage increase is to be indicated along with the date when the district will present a millage increase to the voters. (4) The LRSD has maintained that a significant portion of desegregation expenditures are II start up. II The district must specifically identify which desegregation costs are \"start up\" and when these start up costs will terminate. (5) The revised budget shall be prepared in consultation with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and shall be submitted to the Court within thirty (30) days after the Court rules either from the bench or in a written order on the proposed modifications. - By this Order, the Court confirms its oral approval of the construction of the interdistrict school at the Crystal Hill site. Further, the Court confirms oral instructions made to the parties to explore alternative sites for the construction of King -4-Interdistrict School along the 1-630 corridor. DATED this of January, 1992. I .2?^ STATES DIST'RR2I CCTT JJUDGE SHEET IN ^PLL i) FRCP -5- Synopsis of Circuit and District Court orders and ODM communication regarding the LRSD budget: Circuit Court Order of December 12, 1990: 1. If the District Court becomes convinced in the future that money is being wasted, and that desegregation obligations contained in the settlement plans are being flouted, it will be fully authorized to take appropriate remedial action. 2. The Court is to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the settlement plans and agreement Letter from the Monitor to LRSD, October 28, 1991: The LRSD must be able to provide the Court with information that: 1. Accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n2. Demonstrates the link between the districts legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n3. Describes a desegregation budget process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\n4. Enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. District Court Order of January 21, 1992: 1. The Court expressed concern about its ability to effectively monitor the settlement plan without budgets that reflect district intentions, goals, and priorities regarding desegregation efforts. 2. The Court determined that the LRSD budgetary process does not meet the requisites stated in the Monitors letter and directed the district to submit a revised budget. 3. The budget must be directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan which are reflected on updated implementation timelines contained in the plan. 4. The LRSD must submit a long-range budget projection on a per annum basis that covers all anticipated desegregation expenditures over the entire term of the desegregation agreement. 5. The LRSD must submit a long-range revenue projection, covering the same period of time, that includes revenues anticipated not only from the settlement monies and the settlement loan, but also from state and millage revenues and any other money sources.6. 7. The long-range revenue projection will provide a clear picture of the districts financial future and, thereby, enable the LRSD to predict with accuracy if and when a millage increase will be needed. The amount and time of any anticipated millage increase is to be indicated along with the date when the district will present a millage increase to the voters. The district must specifically identify which desegregation costs are \"start up\" and when these start up costs will terminate. District Court Order of February 23, 1993: 1. 2. The Court expressed concern about its ability to monitor the parties compliance with the settlement plans absent budget documents that clearly reflect the districts allocation of resources in relation to both short-range and long-range planning to meet desegregation plan goals, programs, and priorities. The superintendent submitted a budget document wherein he stated he would: a. b. c. d. e. Immediately begin directing a process for Board involvement in the long-range planning and budgeting process\nDirect the new administration team to conduct a desegregation plan audit\nRestructure the budgeting process so that full attention and resources are directed at improving student achievement\nStrive to place the entire district in the position of being accountable for improving student achievement\nLink programs which are designed to improve instruction and achievement to expected outcomes and goals. If a program does not have this linkage, the superintendent will recommend nonrenewal of personnel contracts in these areas. 3. The Court stated that findings in the LRSDs 1990 Curriculum Audit continue to exist in the district a. b. c. d. School management practices show inadequate control of district resources. The district may be not exercising appropriate stewardship such as in management of programs and personnel. The budget is not viewed as a comprehensive planning document driven by curriculum needs. Visible and tangible linkages between budget priorities and curriculum priorities are not apparent. 4. 5. The superintendent stated in a February 1,1993 hearing that it would be one-and-one-half years before the LRSD would have a budget that would meet the requirements of the Courts previous orders. The LRSD must achieve a budget process, develop a budget document, and demonstrate budget management that fully reflect the districts careful planning for meeting itsdesegregation obligations over the full span of the settlement plans. 6. 7. 8. The Court is concerned with not only the expenditure of desegregation settlement money but also all the state, local, and federal fonds the district uses to finance its entire operation. The Court finds it necessary to assist the LRSD by appointing a person or persons to work with the LRSD to prepare a budget document that will make it possible for the Court to monitor the districts many desegregation commitments. The Court will not consider the task complete until the LRSD demonstrates it understands that budgeting procedures, and the resulting budget documents, are not static, but an integral part of the districts on-going planning and evaluation processes.Numerous Court orders and records address the characteristics of the budgetary process and budget document that will enable the Court to effectively monitor how the LRSD is planning and applying use of its resources toward fulfilling its desegregation commitments. Based on ODMs monitoring needs and on Court records that include the Monitors letter of Oct. 28, 1991, Circuit Court orders of December 12, 1990, District Court Orders of January 21, 1992 and February 23, 1993, and LRSD submissions of July 31, 1992 to the District Court, the LRSDs budget processes and resulting documents must reflect the following elements, clearly and closely linked together\n1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The districts legal obligations (plan provisions and court orders,) based upon a current desegregation plan audit that will enable the district to clearly identify its desegregation goals and subordinate objectives. 0uly 31, 1992 LRSD submission) Needs assessment and planning, both short-term and long-term, to meet court order and desegregation plan goals, programs, and priorities, that also reflects a process which includes Board involvement in long-range planning and budgeting. 0uly 31, 1992 LRSD Budget submission and Feb. 23, 1993 Order) Prioritization based on (1) importance or \"weight\" factors in relation to desegregation goals, plan provisions, and Court orders, (2) sequence of events (what must be done first so other things can be done second, and so on,) and (3) programs or activities that will require larger portions of resources, or a longer commitment of resources, in order to be fulfilled. 0an. 21, 1992 and Feb. 23, 1993 Orders) Identification of all financial resources (including settlement funds and federal, state, local, and any other revenues) and anticipation of when millage increases will be sought. 0an. 21, 1992 and Feb. 23, 1993 Orders) An accurate and comprehensive accounting for the allocation and expenditure of all financial resources (including settlement funds and federal, state, local, and any other revenues.) (Feb. 23, 1993 Order) A monitoring system that includes a regular review of whether expenditures are being made at the rate and amount proportionate to allocations, goals, objectives, priorities, timelines, and formative and summative evaluation feedback. (Circuit Court Order, Dec. 12, 1990\nDistrict Court Orders of Jan. 21, 1992 and Feb. 23, 1993) Evaluation criteria and methods, both formative and summative, upon which to determine whats working, where changes may be needed, where any money is being wasted, where economies can be effected, and the rate of progress toward desegregation goals. (Circuit Court, Dec. 12, 1990) Timelines, with specific starting and completion dates for all work, that include a designation of who is responsible for each step described above. Qan. 21, 1992)Project goal: To develop and implement budgeting processes, budget documents, and budget management procedures and practices that are institutionalized as an integral part of the district's ongoing planning, monitoring, and evaluation processes to ensure the district fulfills its desegregation goals, programs, and priorities over the full span of the settlement agreement (Feb 23, 1993)' { FE3 2 4 r 53 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 0!:ic3 ci Ci\n!\nti s!J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER On February 1, 1993, the Court held a hearing to determine. among other things, what progress the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") was making with respect to conforming its budgetary process to that outlined in earlier orders of the Coxirt. Having considered the testimony and exhibits presented at the hearing, the Court detennines that the LRSD needs assistance in developing a budget that complies with the Court's requirements for a budgeting process and document that can be effectively monitored. The Court first notified the LRSD of its concern about the LRSD's budgetary process over a year ago. During hearings on the parties' proposed modifications to their settlement plans, the Court expressed concern about its ability to monitor the parties' compliance with the settlement plans absent budget documents that clearly reflect the districts' allocation of resources in relation to both short-range and long-range planning to meet desegregation plan goals, programs, and priorities. The Court specifically addressed its remarks to the LRSD, and followed up its comments I 5 Q with an order filed on January 21, 1992, directing the LRSD to submit a revised 1991-92 budget, prepared in consultation with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\"). The Court ordered the LRSD to make certain submissions so the Court could determine that the LRSD's budgetary process would meet the following requisites: 1) accurately reflect and comprehensively account for the expenditure of settlement funds\n2) demonstrate the requirements requirements\nand link the between fiscal the district's underwriting of legal those 3) describe a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand 4) enable the district to detennine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. The LRSD filed its response to the Court's order on June 1, 1992, \"LRSD Projected Revenue and Expense - 1992/93-1996/97.\" A revised version of this document was filed on July 31, 1992. Among the changes and additions in the revision's section entitled \"Desegregation Budgeting: Description Future Year Procedures\" were new statements that II [t]he Superintendent will immediately begin directing a process for Board involvement in the long-range planning and budgeting process\" and \"[t]he Superintendent will direct the new administration team to conduct a Desegregation Plan audit and related budget proposals.\" Additionally, in the budget document presented to the Court on July 31, 1992, which was the subject of an August 3, 1992 hearing. LRSD Superintendent Bernd, who had come on board July 1, 1992, stated: Once this budget is adopted, the budgeting process will not end. We must begin to restructure the budgeting -2-process so that full attention and resources are directed at improving student achievement rather than providing so many different programs which ultimately distract the District's focus to other issues. It is my goal to place the entire District in the position of being accountable for improving student achievement. This will be done by concentrating our attention first on the core curricular areas. Next, programs which are designed to improve instruction and achievement in these areas will be linked to particular expected outcomes and goals. If a program dees not have this linkage, I will be recommending in the Spring of 1993 that personnel contracts in these areas not be renewed for the next fiscal year. Finally, for the District to operate efficiently and effectively, it will be necessary to streamline the administration, Because contracts have been renewed for 1992-93, this cannot be fully accomplished this year. On the other hand, the District has several cost centers where investment in personnel might produce savings generate revenues for the District. or will be considered in the coming months. All of these items Document # 1649. In December 1990, the LRSD Board of Directors received a Curriculum Audit it had commissioned the National Curriculum Audit Center to conduct. This report is a part of the case record. In Finding 5.3, the report found that \"school management practices show inadequate control of district resources.\" In Finding 5.1, the auditors stated: 11 [T]he district may be not exercising appropriate stewardship such as in management of programs and personnel.\" The auditors found that \"the budget was not viewed as a comprehensive planning document driven by curriculum needs. Visible and tangible linkages between budget priorities and curriculum priorities were not apparent . . It Finding 5.4. The Court finds that this continues to be the case. -3-Despite the persistent urging of the Court, there is no indication that a budget process of the type sought by the Court is or will be forthcoming from the LRSD. During the February 1, 1993 hearing at which budget matters were discussed, the Court asked Superintendent Bernd when the district would have a budget that would meet the requirements of the Court's previous Orders. Dr. Bernd replied that he believed the district was \"at least a year and a half away. tl The Court has been patient. It encouraged the LRSD to work with the ODM on the district budget, but, despite ODM's diligent efforts to assist, the LRSD has not produced a budget process that enables the Court to meet its obligation to monitor desegregation plan compliance. The Court, thus, finds it is necessary to assist the LRSD by appointing a person or persons to work with the LRSD at LRSD expense to prepare a budget document that will make it possible for the Court to monitor the myriad of programs the LRSD agreed to conduct in its desegregation settlement plan. The Court is concerned not only with the LRSD's expenditure of desegregation money but also with all the state, local, and federal funds the district uses to finance its entire operation. The LRSD must achieve a budgeting process, develop a budget document, and demonstrate budget management that fully reflect the district's careful planning for meeting its desegregation obligations over the full span of the settlement plans. The person or persons employed will be paid by the LRSD but will report to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. The LRSD is -4-expected to treat the employee or employees like its other full- time employees for purposes of benefits and will provide adequate work space, equipment, and materials along with full access to information and. support. The Court, after consultation with the person or persons and the LRSD, will determine appropriate salaries. The employment will not be permanent but will continue for as long as it takes to get the job done, as determined by the Court. The Court will not consider the task complete until the LRSD demonstrates that it understands that budgeting procedures, and the resulting budget documents, are not static, but an integral part of the district's on-going planning and evaluation processes. DATED this day of February, 1993. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON COMPLIANCEV/ITH RULE53 AND/OR Ta^RCP )N BY______d-------------- -5-0 iSC a UK! rc3 C\ni:C9 0 IN (Ht UNITEU STATES OISIHtCT CUURT L 2 b 1993 s * EASIEHN DISIRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Lfc 2-^ as. OtSTHICT COURT EASTSRN OtSTRiCT ARKANSAS X\n2 i995 LU I IE KOCk SCHOOL UlSf HICI p I ai nt i r r, w s . PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT , 0\u0026gt;i l endan t. CARL R- BRENTS, CLBRf^ Dy\nNO. a2-CV-866 Monday , February 1 , Little Roc k , 9:35 A.H. VOLUME XLil HE.AHING ON HUOGET PROCESS C?.CUnK 1993 .A r k a n 3 ( J 5 I i BEhORE THE HONORABLE SUSAN MEBBE.R WHiGHT, UNilEU SI.aIES OiSTRiCl JUDGE, APPEARANCES: as rol lows-. I i I On Behair oT the Plaintifr: CHRISTOPHER J. HELLER Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 7 2201 On Behalf of the Joshua Intervenors: JOHN W. WALKER WILEY BRANTON, JR. John w. Walker, p.a. 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas TZZQb On Behalf of the Knight Intervenors: RICHARD W. ROACHELL Attorney at Law 1014 West Third Street Little Hock, Arkansas Proceed i ng s I 7220 I reported by niachine stenography\nTranscript prepared by notereading. ( Page I 209 ) i 02 It was coded In terms or Functions, not programs. in other  2 words, textbooks, utilities. the t sort or thing. And 11 does 3 give the Court Inrornallon about the functions the district 4 0 o / Span t its inone^ on, but it's not grouped according to programs. tor example, magnet program at Central, magnet program at Henderson, the accelerated learning program, or any theme at id i2 any 1 nee nt1ue terms or conce rn schooI. rune L i ons. Nutii I ng IS In And It was my concern that that i c Q u I d ri t do much wI th terms or programs. it s I ri i could not and still my that in terms or planning. or determining 1mpI emen ta 11 on what the district was planning and monitoring its or that plan. a a i i Ihe new superintendent, Ur. Uernd, did Indicate at a i4 hearing last summer or last spring when he rirst came on board. i5 and this hearing on was budget cuts, that he would make every id errort to implement a budget process that was designed to i / evaluate programs and meet student needs. id i9 And, in fact, he wrote and this Is in the LKSO iyy2-i994 operating budget document dated July 23, iy92. He 40 wrote, unce this budget is adopted, the budgeting proce ss will 2i 22 23 not end. we must begin to restructure the budgeting process so that rulI attention and resources are directed at 1mprow1 ng student achievement rather than providing so many di rferent 24 programs which ultimately distract the districts focus to other- 2b issues.'' i bJ Now, X have some question about all or these things. about the curriculum audit, about my own budgeting order and J about what Ur. Bernd pledged. 4 b b / B r I rs t or all. I want to ask what process 1s the district using i I don t know. Hr. Heller, who should answer these questions. What process is the district using to identity programs that do improve student achievement as opposed to those that d i 5 t rac t i ng i MH. HtLLtHi I would suggest, your Honor, that to lU talk about the whole budget process. it might be best to start i.s with Bernd who can give IHk cUUHIs AII right. i 1 U r . i J MR. HtULtH: a lot of the background and where 1 4 ib we've come since the operating budget was submitted, and then Mr. oary Jones can answer the more particular questions ib about our accounting methods and budgeting process. 1 / td IHt CUUKI! All right. I hat will be tine. Ur. Bernd, and Id like tor the clerk to swear Ur. Bernd it he s 19 going to take the stand. MB. BilrUNt 1 r you  11 raise your right hand, please. ai MAC BERNU, SWORN 2Z . VHt WITNESSt 1 do . MS. Sir I ON: Please be seated. 24 f Ht COUR I I All ri ght. Ur. Bernd, again, 1 recall 2 J 2b your budget document or 1992-93 dated last summer, July 23,  d. right? 04 And i feineititie r you came on board. when, July 1, is that IHt WilNtSS: fes , your Honor. 1 J 4 IHt CUUKt: And i remember your First day on the Job b was spent in this courtroom which must not ha-ye bean a pleasant o experience. z You indicate that full attention and re sou rces a le directed at improving student achievement rather than y providing so many ditrerent programs which ultimately distract the district' b Focus to other issues. i I What i want to know 15 what process are you using to iii identlFy programs that help student achievement as opposed to X J those tha t don' t. X4 ib ib IHt WilNtbS: somewhat long answer'! I Ht GOUR I . is your Honor prepared to indulge in im going to need to give you background. Yes. i tell you what my concern is. i i guess i should ask this: Uo you have a budget document that ib would indicate to me how you plan to spend your money on a i iy programs, and then, can you explain to me through that document 20 how you would evaluate and seIF-ava Iuate the Implementation or 2i 22 those programs, that is, the success oF them or lack or it? IHt WirNtbSi Your Honor, we're working toward that. 2 3 but id like to give you some background and, also, talk a 24 2b little bit about what we have done to change our budgeting process so so you could have an understandI ng oF that. 1 a J 4 b o ! a a io i i i^ i J i4 ib lb i / ib ig 20 21 22 23 24 2b b b fHt GUUHI I You may answer. A I I right. You may answer. I h a t 3 Fine. I would prefer to have brief answers, but if has to be lengthy, you may make a lengthy answer. iHt WilNtbS: Your Honor, at the time i was before this Court to talk about the budget cuts. concerned about i n the district still that 1 was I was a primary And , the linkage between and 1 t between what were doing student achievement. and that certainly I s consideration. at this point. that shows we don t have a budget document that linkage, and id have to. your Honor that i think frankly, tell Its going to be a while before it would be possible to come up with that. And what i want to do is give you some background on the problem so you 11 understand why. The other point that 1 was making in that hearing. i think this is an area that we have made some progress to do with community input and just the Input of people budget itself because i accompanying need. saw that as as as a on , and had into the an We made some some drastic budget cuts In a very short amount of time last sumraer with very little input. and so, we began an input process early this carrying that through. And 1 can talk about think that is IHt G0UR1 All right. fell me (Ht HllNtSS. I Ht GOUR I I fall that important to mention. All right. and we've been because X Now, keep in mind that when1 you say bo community input,' does the comiiiun 1 ty input come from a  J 4 b b / b body or who are people who has before them ths Ueaegregition Plan and coinmitted to Implementing that Plan/ I Hb I Ht IHh IHt IHt Mi I NtSli! dUUHi: Mi INbSS\nGUUHI I Mi I NtSb! i A. I I i believe right. be I i eve so. Or are they so . coinmitted to other things? well. they may well be committed to y other things as well. iu I Ht GOURI : right. AS long as they have berore A I I 1 i them as a working document the UesegregatI on Plan which sets id forth the goals. Its r i ne with me to have community input. i 1 J til ink thats very healthy. but If they have other agendas that 1 4 work at cross-purposes with the court s obligation to desegregate these schools pursuant to the Plan, i don't think ib its fruitful to have it. i / IHt MIlNtbSi {Nodding head up and down.) ib la I Ht CUUKI I IHh WiTNESSi But you may proceed. Well, i want to first start with the 20 the matters that are of most concern to you, and that is the 2i I inkage between the things we re doing in the district and s tuden t achi evemen t. 22 2 J in order to get a good start on establishing that 24 2b I Inkage I Inkage and, your Honor, i m nut admitting that a perfect can ever be made, but we can certainly do better. i n1  2 J 4 b o snn Other words, we're talking about a very complex system, and 1 X have had a lot of experience with school districts in the county , i know or none that can demonstrate a causal relationship between budgetary expenditures and student achievement. but we can do a lot better. IHt CUURI! but can t you with programs and student achl e vemen L tan you make a causa i relationship between b i tt programs and achievement/ iu IHh WilNtbS: Not causal, your Honor. You can make COITS I all one I re I at I onsii i p , you can make some pretty informed i 1 Ld i J dec 1s i ons . and i think they can be much more informed than the ones we are niak i ng now . 1Ht tOUKl: All right. 14 th IHt WXfNtSS: things we're Xn order to do that, one of the first we re going to need is a better accounting 10 system, and X have to talk a little bit about what we were 1 / confronted with when we began in July. lb Ihe district had converted over to a a budget that. 1!# basically, gave each of the program managers a sum of money CO which. i n a sense. is a good thing because you have site-based :i 2 4 24 2b management, but we had gone completely away from the line item budget that the district theyd had before, and X think X heard your Honor  one of the frustrations you expressed is we Just had these categories like salaries that go across tiie district and they're not linked to programs.I IHt CUUHI I H 1 ghL. QU  J 4 Q / u y id 1 i 14 id 14 lb IQ 1 / lU ly ZO 41 44 4J IHt WilNtSU: oppoiite extreme. W* I I , we -- we have gone to the We had d kind oi a location budget control budget where there was or a a pot ot money ror each program managers, but we had gone away r rom sped tying item within those programs what the dirtsrent the managers. So, spent on salary, on, and i t ot the by line accoun t s we re tor they were unable to tel I how much was being how much was being spent on textbooks and so s created so, a what were converting back to a it s created quite a problem. in the middle or doing is now line item budget within those control accounts so, hoperully, or best worlds. well have the best or best the both but that is taking And the other thing that or time is the computer changeover. L i me. s taken a considerable amount Ihat was a system that was purchased betore this administration came on board. been a tremendous number or runctional problems with ability to get basic rinanclal to the district. Ihere have 1t and i t s Inrormation and other info rma tI on And, again, we feel like we're making some progress in addressing those problems, but they re not f i xed yes. i think the yet. the In the middle frustration for me at this point is is that were or building a basic in format ion system so we can 4 4 4b Just begin to envision. move to the kind of a system that that you 1 think we could have some some dialogue about the i level or speciricity we' I I eventually get to. i oy the Is sue o r  a J 4 b o ! a y io i i tc X4 Xb Xb i J XH X9 \u0026lt;:u Zi di causa I relationship Is, 1 think. an important.one. We  1 I probably never get tu that point, but we can do a lot better job. 1 i i m going to make a cominent, your Honor. We re kI nd o r driving it. 1 n the and Its situation or Fixing the car while we ' I'e i t so , we have to go on with the Functions oF the district, and at changeoV e r s, and that's what I Ht CdUKI : IHt wiiNtaa\nthat there are aud i t, re the same time, make the se in the middle or doing. Have you read the tyetl curriculum audit.' Yes, ma am, i have. I could X COM I d some areas that we have addressed in that but there are many more to address. And X m also quite taken with the Judge's remark about distractions. There are many . IHt UObrtli Uh, X know. IHt WXINtSSi addressed, your Honor. IHt GUUH1: and I n r i X i ng to Fix a district a And some or them, regretrully, must be Well, the re wilt like yours, it will vehicle that is moving. always be distractions, always be tantamount to in other words, you can t stop it\nyou have to keep on going. Xt keeps on. My concern is that two years ago, the district did get ^4 ab notice from the curriculum audit and the Court made that audit a part of the record and, 1n essence, adopted its recommendations, Bl /O 1 and nothing was done for a year. or at least i don't think much  J 4 b tl ! b iu Xi i^ I j i4 ib io i z ib i9 au 2i 22 2b was done For a year. And then the court had another budget hearing ago and ordered And you came on what you go I ng to d I strict said. things be remedied. board and you've J. L sounded good. be a while more. a year and It hasn t been done. indicated that and i I i ke bu t. now , you're saying it's And a I I the while. not only is you r continuing to operate, settlement monies but you continue to yet the From the state. FHt MilNtbb: VHh CUURI: monies rroiii the Yes, your Honor. And you continue to spend the settlement state, and by the time we get this car rixed, going to be out of gas. that s what i m worried about. And it s going to be running, but it's going to be out or gas. i am going to take a more active role through the monitor s i t Ano orrice and, probably, through a court order in your budgetary process, and you can expect that. o you have any more comments to make with my question about linkage curriculum programs to the you have any more comments/ IHE WLINkSSt in a in a general sense. respect to budge t ? Uo your Honor, It'S - we're going to have to get our basic Inrormatlon systems repaired and 1n place, i think, before we can do an ertective 24 2 b job that meets the court s requirements, and i i have to be honest in that regard and and its not something that that 1 i J 4 b 6 / a a iu i i i J I j 14 ib ib I i lb I a au ai 22 2 3 24 2b i 1 can be done In a short amount or time. I Ht COUK I I IHt WilNtSb: First Issue was was When did you start working on It? we began work OU r OU r ou r the computer system, and we. began work on it in July. the with the coming understanding or lend some o r some very to accompI i sh. i 1 will basical Iy, Ihe whole process accelerated with or Mr. Jones, who does have a the who I e system, and i think valuable eApertise to what we good is going t re t r yI ng Freely aonn t to your Honor that virtually did nothing on it until until we got the we budget For this school year adopted and got school open. what we In the meant 1 me, ve basically been doing is trying to make work For the people who rely, on It For the reports that ara required in order kinds or decisions that youre talking une OF the issues is is that the coinpu ter i n F o rmat i on to begin to abou t. the reports and to get make the we got From the new system were quite difterent and much less detailed than the reports that people in the district were used to. and in some cases. as well. And in they had very inaccurate i n to rina t i on on them. And SO, we've had to go through and - great number oF reports, redo and correct a redo them, and work with the venders and the people who sold us this system in order to make it work more adequately For us.az 1 J 4 5 6 MH. WALktH\nIn view or the tact that you will Inquire Into this area this arternoon, may I have access to a copy or any writings that they have documentation of a needs assessment that 1 can study it before? rHt COURi. Su re. Yes . which reflect that there is having already been made so Lets just let Mr. Hoacheil I and any other parties who are interested and who are present be a rurn1 shed that. and the monitors office, too , too. a Who is the person here who is responsible ror that. 10 Ur. He rnd i 11 12 13 IHt WllNtSS: responsibility for It. IHt CUUHI: Mrs. Bernard has over overa I I She is assisted by Mrs. Hart. Ms. Hart and Ms. Bernard. We can talk to 14 them In a rew minutes when we break ror lunch. 15 is that a I I right ? 16 17 18 19 ao HR. WALktH1 IHt COURII I'm talking You stated. position or All right. Also, In your document, you stated about the budget document you submitted 1n July. and \"It 1s my goal to place the entire district 1n the being accountable for Improving student achievement. I , This will be done by concentrating our attention rirst on the core curricular areas. \"Next, programs which are designed to Improve ! instruction and achievement in these areas wl I I be linked to particular expected outcomes and goals. If a program does not ^5U' J S* 6 10 jhava thl s 11 nkage . I Mill be 83 recommending in the spring of igyj ithat personnel contracts In these areas are not to be renewed ror the next rtscal year.\" Now, what links between goals, programs and outcomes have you established for these core curriculum areas/ IHt MllNhSbi right now, your Honor. estab Ii shed. Me are In the process of doing that 1 can't tell you that they've been AS a part or -- of a budget process, we Intend to make statements i n that regard. 1 do want to be careful and tell your Honor were 7 a 11 I ! I I i not talking about quantitative measures here. 12 13 14 THE couwr. IHt WllNhSS. fHt GOOHf: Well, ot course not, I understand that. we we cant do that. But we Do you have any programs that you've lb determined don't have the link to student achievements'? lb IHt MilNtSSi At this point, 1 could not 1 couId LI not report on that, but 1 w1I I be able to. IB IHt CUUHI J But you will be recommending this spring ig that personnel contracts In areas won't be renewed  40 41 42 IHt MllNtShi IHt COUKTi IHt WITNESSj Yes, your Honor. if the link isn't made? The 4 J THE COURT I Mell, When do you think you can have 44 this? Because the Court asked you in November, November bth or 4 b 1994, to let me know of changes before registration, beforeNEEDSOl REVISED 08 APR 93 NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS The survey instrument should have an optional question to ask the person if they know of additional people we should talk to. 2. During the survey, be sure to get the mailing address of the person so that we can send them a draft of the findings, help build buy-in and team attitude. This will 3. The needs assessment should have section dealing with enrollment and school avallabi1ity...kind of a school plan. It should be linked with the long range facility plan to give Plant Services some idea of the future. 4. The needs assessment should include appropriate items from the Curriculum Audit report, items with which we agree. What needs to be done to complete those 5. As part of the needs assessment, I should look at the other budget and planning systems within the county, models. and some other 6. The needs assessment should include items from the deseg plan and various deseg plan audits. 1. a 7. CA. The needs assessment should take input from each of the organizational and functional units for inclusion in the plan. 8. CA-109. The needs assessment should have a facilities section. This recommendation has some outline factors at CA-109. 9. CA-115. testing...recommendation. Establish a functional assessment program and expand The planning needs assessment should draw on this functional assessment and testing outcomes. 10.GOAL01 REVISED 14 MAY 93 GOAL AND OBJECTIVE SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Review all board policies and try to start with some existing goals and objectives. Should include any policy statements. 2. CA-32. Outlines the need for district-wide goals and objectives. Framework for the plan. 3. BC-10. Has a good objective item. ..setting up the Little Rock Public Education Fund which would provide community support for education programs. 4. BC-10. Good goal item stop the out migration of students. 5. BC-10. schools. Good goal item attract students from the private 6. G4-1. the major starting point. Good list of goals for the district. This should be 7. F15-7. of the 1992 plan, Additionally, under the title \"leadership\" on pages 2-3 the board and superintendent have failed to assert strong leadership in the following areas: (1) Clearly delineating the district's desegregation mission to the staff and the community. (2) Utilizing the desegregation mission as a guide for developing policies and setting expectations for the superintendent to implement those policies. BUDOl REVISED 18 MAY 93 BUDGET SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. We will need to write a budget manual. It will have to give instructions and definitions to all budget managers on budget use and process preparation. 2. Might expand \"School/Dept Budget Requests\" to include a program review and to solicit input from budget managers. 3. There needs to be a provision for monthly expense reporting and financial review. this. Check out the principles meeting. The principles meeting might be used for 4. There needs to be a expenditure items, and budget sections. supporting Doug Eaton handles this. subprocess for capital Should link planning 5. There needs to be a expenditure items. supporting subprocess for property Charlie Neal will have to play a big part. Should link the planning and budget sections. 6. CA-13. personnel. Budget process needs to involve key administrative 7. CA-91. Need better expense allocations in the budget process. management and control of 8. CA-92. educational staff. Budget process needs the involvement of key 9. CA-94. and trained to. Budget process steps need to be clearly articulated 10. CA-94. Budget needs allocations...program budget. programmatic identification of 11. CA-119. Good outline of the program budgeting process. Could be used for the budget manual, process. Talks about linking to the planning 12. F8. The LRSD must be able information that: 1. to provide the Court with expenditure of settlement funds\nAccurately and comprehensively accounts for the 2. Demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements\nrequirements and the fiscal underwriting of those 3. Describes a desegregation budget process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\n4. Enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with d e s eg r a t i o o^ ig^ tjjjn s^ Budgeting and^ TrSca management to ensure full implementation of the desegregation plan needs to be such that the district can answer the following questions: 1. What are the district guidelines for identifying expenditures as desegregation costs? 2. What process is used to project the desegregation budget? 3. How do these costs correspond to the specific provisions of the desegregation plan, i.e., what is the correlation between the settlement monies and specific desegregation objectives? 4. If a cost item IS determined to be both a desegregation and nondesegregation item (staff development might be a fair example), what criteria determines the apportionment of cost to the desegregation budget (code 13) and the \"regular\" budget? 5. Who makes the decisions about which cost items are budgeted in code 13? 6. Who makes the decisions about which costs actually debited to code 13? are 7. What criteria determine debiting decisions are made? how budgeting and 8. What checks are built into the accounting/bookkeeping system to prevent arbitrary debiting of cost items to one budget category or another? 9. What are the district's spending priorities and how have they been determined? 10, What is the district's plan and corresponding timeline for reaching the 90% achievement goal for black students, thereby attaining forgiveness of state loans the district otherwise must repay? 11. What steps is the district taking to prevent a funding shortfall that will inhibit carrying out the desegregation plan to its full extent? 13. F9. The Court effectively monitor the expressed concern about its reflect district intentions, settlement plan without budgets ability to that goals. and priorities regarding desegregation efforts. The Court determined that the LRSD budgetary process does not meet the requisites stated in the Monitor's letter and directed the district to submit a revised budget. The Budget must be directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan which are reflected on updated implementation timelines contained in the plan. The LRSD must submit a long-range budget projection on a per annum basis that covers all anticipated desegregation expenditures over the entire term of the desegregation agreement. The LRSD must submit a long-range revenue projection. covering the same period of time. that includes revenues anticipated not only from the settlement monies and the settlementloan, but also from state and millage revenues and any other money sources. The long-range revenue projection will provide a clear picture of the district's financial future and, thereby, enable the LRSD to predict with accuracy if and when a millage increase will be needed. The amount and time of any anticipated millage increase is to be indicated along with the date when the district will present a millage increase to the voters. The district must specifically identify which desegregation costs are \"start-up\" and when these start-up costs will terminate. 14. FIO. The Court expressed concern about its ability to monitor the parties' compliance with the settlement plans absent budget documents that clearly reflect the districts' allocation of resources in relation to both short-range and long-range planning to meet desegregation plan goals, programs, and priorities. The Court ordered (Jan 21, 1992) the LRSD to make certain submissions so the Court could determine that the LRSD's budgetary process would meet the following requisites: 1) accurately reflect and comprehensively account for the expenditure of settlement funds\n2) demonstrate the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n3) describe a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand 4) enable the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary 3 obligations. in order to align finances with desegregation The Superintendent submitted a budget document wherein he stated he would restructure the budgeting process so that full attention and resources are directed at achievement. The improving student Court stated that findings in the LRSD's 1990 Curriculum Audit continue to exist in the district: a. control of district resources. School management practices show inadequate b. The budget is not viewed as planning document driven by curriculum needs. a comprehensive c. Visible and tangible linkages between budget priorities and curriculum priorities are not apparent. The superintendent stated in a February 1, 1993 hearing that it would be one and one half years before the LRSD would have a budget that would meet the requirements of the Court's previous orders. The LRSD must achieve a budget process, develop a budget document, and demonstrate budget management that fully reflect the district's careful planning for meeting its desegregation obligations over the full span of the settlement plans. The court is concerned with not only the expenditure of desegregation settlement money but also all the state, local, and federal funds the district uses to finance its entire operation. The Court will not consider the task complete until the LRSD demonstrates it understands that budgeting procedures, and theresulting budget documents, are not static, but an integral part of the district's on-going planning and evaluation processes. 15. A4. Reference 10/28/91 letter from ODM....F8. QI. What are the district guidelines for Identifying expenditures as desegregation cost? Our approach has been to identify personnel and materials that are required for the specific programs mandated by the desegregation plan, to set up budget accounts for those expenses, and charge to them as the programs are implemented. This approach may result in our charging less than possible to desegregation, but it should allow us to account for the settlement funds. It has never been the view of the LRSD that the settlement funds would cover the total cost of desegregation. Q2. What process is used to project the desegregation budget? Building principals, department directors. and others responsible for various functions in the LRSD are designated as budget managers. Each spring the budget managers submit requests for each of the budget account codes assigned to them. Q5. Who makes the decisions about which cost items are budgeted to code 13? The budget managers make the decision with review by the Deputy Superintendent, Associate Superintendents, the Manager of Support Services, and the Controller. Q6. Who makes the decisions about which costs are actually debited to code 13? The budget managers either make this decision or properly done. review monthly expense listings to make sure it is 16. Fil. In October 1991, the ODM informed the LRSD that it must be able to provide the Court with information which (1) accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. The Court finds that the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites and that it is necessary for the LRSD to submit revised cost figures to the Court. Therefore, (1) The LRSD must submit a revised 91-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan and which are reflected on updated implementation timelines contained in the plan. on a (2) The LRSD must submit a long-range budget projection per annum basis which covers all anticipated desegregation expenditures over the entire term of the desegregation agreement. (3) The LRSD must submit a long-range revenue projection covering the same period of time. which includes revenue anticipated not only from the settlement monies and settlement loan, but also from state and millage revenues and any other money sources. This long-term projection will provide a clear picture of the district's financial future and, thereby, enable the LRSD topredict with accuracy if and when a millage increase will be needed. The amount and time of any anticipated millage increase is to be indicated along with the date when the district will present a millage increase to the voters. (4) The LRSD has maintained that a significant portion of desegregation expenditures are \"start-up\" . The district must specifically identify which desegregation costs are \"start-up\" and when these start up costs will terminate. 17. A5. Description of future year procedures: A. a list of desegregation programs with 2-digit program numbers and a description of costs to be charged to each program will be prepared. The program number will be coded in the fifth and sixth positions of the account number that costs may be charged to a desegregation program from various operating units and B. functions for various objects and using money from various fund sources. C. Each budget manager will submit a spending allotted funds. proposal for conjunction with the desegregation plan audit. These proposals will be reviewed in Once specific plans for spending have been proposed, the superintendent will prepare a proposal for Board approval. In addition the superintendent will prepare a process for requiring Board approval for changes in planned expenditures above a to-be determined spending authority. Once the types of expenditures have been programmed, the Purchasing Department will not be authorized to issue a purchase order except for those items programmed and approved. D. The superintendent will immediately begin directing a process for Board involvement in the long-range planning and budgeting process. E. The superintendent will direct the new administration team to conduct a desegregation plan audit and related budget proposals. 18 . F14-15. The court will not tolerate budget cuts inhibiting the full, on-schedule implementation of the desegregation plan. It has ordered the LRSD to restore for the 1992-1993 academic year the seventh period at McClellan High School. The court has ordered that 22.8 FTE music teacher positions and the seventh period at Henderson Junior High School be restored for the 1993-1994 academic year. talented The effect of the other budget reductions: gifted and specialists reduced to 16 FTE positions cut by 10 FTE\npositions: custodial the Pupil Personnel Department\nFTE counselors cut by 19\nelimination of reassignment of 4 instructional aides form the IRC\nreductions in the budgets for material, supply. equipment, and substitutes\nand the strategy to reduce utility costs, will all be monitored closely and may have to be restored if the court determines the cuts are having a negative impact on the district's desegregation efforts. 19. F15-7. Additionally, under the title \"Leadership\" on pages 2- 3 of the 1992 plan, the Board and superintendent have failed to assert strong leadership in the following areas:(1) Adopting a budget that will provide the resources necessary for an effective, desegregated school system. (2) Making budgetary decisions consistent with district desegregation policies in terms of buildings, staff, materials, and equipment. 20. A6-1. Superintendent....We must begin to restructure the budgeting process so that full attention and resources are directed at improving student achievement rather than providing so many different programs which ultimately distract the District's focus to other issues. As part of the desegregation monitoring process, the Distrcit must improve its reporting capabilities. This will require rebuilding the desegregation budget by conducting a \"Desegregation Plan Audit\". The individual desegregation programs have been given separate accounting codes to track programs across school and department lines. The dollars listed in this budget represent the dollars charged against Settlement and operating revenue. In addition, special revenue sources. support desegregation programs. such as Chapter 1, are also used toPLANOl REVISED 18 MAY 93 LONG RANGE PLAN SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Should audit the desegregation plan and link expenditures to the plan elements. of the requirements. strategic plan. All desegregation plan items should become part This would incorporate all legal 2. as part Be sure to include Doug Eaton's long range planning committee of the planning process. point...kind of their idea. Could be a useful starting 3. The plan must start with some long range planning factors which will be monitored on a foundation of the planning process. regular basis. and will be the These would be enrollment trends, enrollment by school, teacher assignment, etc. figures at the district and school level to track progress. Aggregate 4. CA-13. planning process. Key administrative staff should be involved in the 5. CA-17. Strategic vision and long range planning a must. Good overall justification and big-picture approach. 6. CA-19. The purpose of strategic plans is outlined here. 7. CA-19. Board policy AD-1 requires curriculum plan. 8. CA-44. Outlines the need for a curriculum development plan. Also cites a 5/24/90 memo to sample plan. the Superintendent outlining a 9. CA-106. Audit recommends a team board/administrative planning and collaboration, idea. through Really a good 10. CA-119. linkages. Need Material for in programmatic budgeting this section could be and planning used for the description of the planning and budgeting process. 11. CA-121. Cites the need for strategic planning. Also outlines the planning process and some of the factors which should be cons idered. 12. BC-1. Outlines some very specific things for planning factors to be considered in planning staffing and population trends, about minimum class size. Talks 13. BC-3. analysis. Outlines more specific planning factors for staffing Good reference point.14, BC-10. a strategic planning effort. Outlines the need for and general requirements for 15. BC-10. Outlines the need for the Little Rock Public Education Fund,,,community support for education programs. Would probably be a good item to include in the goals and objectives. 16. FIO. the parties' The Court expressed concern about its ability to monitor documents that compliance with the settlement plans absent budget clearly reflect the districts' allocation of resources in relation to both short-range and long-range planning to meet desegregation plan goals, programs, and priorities. The superintendent submitted a budget document wherein he stated he would: a. Immediately begin directing a process for Board Involvement in the long-range planning and budgeting process\nb. Direct the new administration team to conduct a desegregation plan audit\nc. Link programs which are designed to Improve instruction and achievement to expected outcomes and goals. program does not have this linkage, the superintendent If a will recommend nonrenewal of personnel contracts in these areas. The Court stated that findings in the LRSD's 1990 Curriculum Audit continue to exist in the district: a. The district may be not exercising appropriate stewardship such as in management of programs and personnel. The Court will not consider the task complete until the LRSD demonstrates it understands that budgeting procedures, and the resulting budget documents, are not static, but and integral part of the district's on-going planning and evaluation processes. 17. F12-2. Further, The parties are not authorized to modify it at will. we agree. for the most part, that any changes approved should be concerned only with the details of the plan, affecting it onl and at the margin, so to speak. We wish to dispel, in particular. the three notion that an asserted lack of funds on the part of any of school districts would justify a reduction in their commitment to desegregation represented in the 1989 plan...The desegregation obligations undertaken in the 1989 plan are solemn and binding commitments, not be disturbed. The essence and core of that plan should If a question is truly one only of detail, not affecting the major substantive commitments to desegregation. the district court has the authority to consider It. example. as the district court noted. Some such changes. may have merit. because they advance desegregation, or for other reasons. changes that go beyond the level of detail, moreover. for either Even could be approved, but only if the parties affirmatively establish good reasons (not including lack of funds) for them. It may be helpful for us to state those elements of the 1989 plan that we consider crucial, and with respect to which no retreat should be approved. They are as follows: (1) double funding for students attending the incentive (virtually all -black)schools\n(2) operation of the agreed number of magnet schools according to the agreed timetable\n(3) operation of the agreed number of interdistrict schools according to the agreed timetable\n(4) intradistrict desegregation of PCSSD according to the agreed timetable\n(5) the agreed effort to eliminate achievement disparity between the races\n(6) the agreed elements of early- childhood education. appropriate involvement of parents. at least in the incentive schools\nand (7)MONITOI REVISED 08 APR 93 MONITORING SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Need to think about a monthly budget/plan review with all department heads. 2. Need to think about at report for the board and the money managers. least a monthly financial summary 3. CA-54. Outlines some of the monitoring practices rhe ihi) need to be set up and controlled.EVAL01 REVISED 18 MAY 93 EVALUATION SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Need a component system to capture achievements tracking and monitoring. for plan 2. CA-22. evaluation. Points out that board policy IM requires program This should also be linked to the planning subprocess. 3. a CA-68. Outlines some of the items which should be included in program evaluation program.... some looking for. of the standards they are 4. CA-86. Points out that evaluation and assessment data and information should be used as feedback into the decision-making process. This must be worked into the process plan. 5. BC-1. evaluation. Points out the need for a concerted effort at program Major statement. 6. F15-7. Additionally, under the title \"leadership\" on pages 2- 3 of the 1992 plan, the board and superintendent have failed to assert strong leadership in the following areas: (1) Conducting an annual self-evaluation of their commitment to a quality desegregated education. 7. A6-2. Superintendent...programs which are designed to improve instruction and achievement in these areas will be linked to particular expected outcomes and goals. If a program does not have this linkage, I will be recommending in the Spring of 1993 that personnel contracts in these areas not be renewed for the next fiscal year.PUBLICOl REVISED 18 MAY 93 PUBLIC INFORMATION SUBPROCESS REQUIREMENTS 1. Presentation of project plan to Brown and Bernd. 2. Presentation of project plan to School board. 3. Presentation of project plan to Court. 4. There will have to be a training component in each module or subprocess. 5. F13-2. obligation to The MRC complains work with the that MRC the LRSD failed in its reorganization prior to implementing or budget reduction plans that would affect the programming or staff at the magnet schools. 6. F13-4. Initially it is clear that the MRC is a decision-making rather than merely an advisory body. 7. F14-12. The district must be mindful of the language in its desegregation plan which states that a McClellan Community School planning committee (now called the McClellan Community High School Advisory Council) is a means for promoting community involvement and input so that whatever changes are proposed for the school will reflect the community's needs and wishes. This council must be meaningfully involved in all changes at McClellan, including budget planning and adjustment. It is within the scope of the committee's responsibilities to help the district monitor the effect of the budget cuts on the community school program, recommend any appropriate changes that will enable the program to achieve its goals economically but effectively, and to work with the district in planning the 1993-1994 community school program budget.FILED U-S-OISTBiCTCOUBT niSTPICTABKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JUN 1 51993 csp.cLs\n, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS, LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER The Court hereby notifies the parties that hearings will be held on Wednesday, July 7, 1993 and Thursday, July 8, 1993 to review budget matters involving the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) and the Little Rock School District (LRSD). The following week is open for continuation of the hearings. The Court will begin the hearings with a discussion of the PCSSD's approval of a 1992-93 contract agreement with its employee union, PACT. The Court wants to know how the PCSSD will be able to fund that retroactive salary agreement and continue to meet its desegregation obligations under the settlement plan. The Court will also address the LRSD's 1993-94 budget, including the planning process the district used to develop that budget. Prior to the hearing, both the PCSSD and LRSD must submit the information specified below to the Court, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, and the other parties by the dates listed. The Court is requiring this detailed information because the school districts' ability to fund and carry out theirdesegregation plan commitments is requisite to fulfilling the legal obligations they agreed to in their settlement plans. In particular, the Court has expressed longstanding concern that it cannot meet its obligation to monitor desegregation plan compliance until the LRSD implements a budgeting process that will yield a budget reflecting the district's careful planning for meeting its desegregation plan provisions over the full span of the settlement agreement. Therefore, the PCSSD and LRSD will submit: By June 28, 1993: 1. Documentation of the following budgetrelated changes that includes a complete rationale for these changes (a \"business case\") and the dollar amount represented by each change: A. All changes in the nature of additions, deletions, reinstatements\nor B. Deficit reduction actions, such as changes in insurance funding, food service contracting, loans, etc. C. All certified teacher salary increases. These increases must be charted in the following manner (which is illustrated and explained in the accompanying chart): (1) Starting with the base salary for an employee category, create a table in increments of $5,000. Within each incremental group, show (2) the number of employee positions\n(3) the average salary, based on that group's total number of employees and their salaries\n(4) the average step increase\n(5) the average of any additional salary increase (percentage raise) -2- above the step increase\n(6) the new average salary for the increment that results from the step increase eind percentage raise\n(7) the revised total increase for the increment group\n(8) the impact of these salary increases on the budget\n(9) total cost to the district of teacher salaries\n(10) the average teacher salary in 1993-94. D. (LRSD only) A summary spreadsheet reflecting the E. following: April 26, addition, the initial 1993-94 tentative budget dated 1993\nseparate line items reflecting each deletion. reinstatement. reduction. or any other action impacting the base budget\nand a total to be consistent with the updated 199394 tentative budget. (LRSD only) A written action plan for how the district will deliver all requirements of item 4 detailed below. By Jxme 30, 1993: 2. An updated 1993-94 tentative budget document from both and LRSD. PCSSD The LRSD budget must include: A. By school or department, budget detail showing function code, object code, and FTE that includes any changes from the 199293 budget as to additions, deletions, and reinstatements\nB. Also by school or department, 1991-92 actual expenses, the 1992-93 budget, 1992-93 unaudited actual expenses, and the 1993-94 budget\n-3-c. Any other summaries and budgets shown in the table of contents of the tentative budget document. 3. A budget sximmary from both PCSSD and LRSD projecting revenues and expenses for each of the next five fiscal years. The summary must reflect annual incoming settlement monies (and for the LRSD, drawing). any settlement loan funds the district anticipates The summary must also include anticipated yearly M- to-M revenues. By July 30, 1993\n4. (LRSD only) A written plan for the long-range planning and budget process to be used in developing the 1994-95 budget that includes at least the following: A. Details of the planning and budgeting organization, including identification of the lead planning person and his/her responsibilities and authority, and how implementation of this process will be coordinated and controlled. These details should clearly describe the roles in the planning and budgeting process of the school board, the superintendent, the superintendent's cabinet, and any other key participants. B. A description of the needs assessment strategy that C. addresses sources of input and techniques used to identify needs. along with the roles of the key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. A description of the process for determining district planning and budgeting goals, including how those goals -4-will influence programs and budgets, the major planning standards and criteria used by the district, and the strategy for integrating the requirements of the desegregation plan into the goals. The description should include the roles of key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. D. A description of how programs will be identified and matched to priority needs. how programming will be developed to meet unaddressed needs. and how the requirements of the desegregation plan will be addressed. This description should include the roles of key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. E. A description of the process for linking programs and budgets, for determining program budget priorities, for ensuring that desegregation plan responsibilities are funded, and for the actual decision-making in allocating funds. This description should include the roles of the key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. F. A description of: how the planning and budgeting document will be structured and monitored\nwhat the document will look like (format)\nthe type and frequency of monitoring\nthe type and frequency of reporting\nand how program performance will be matched with budget expenditures. This entire description should include the roles of the key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. -5-G. A description of the program evaluation strategy, including how evaluation criteria will be established, how corrective action will be initiated, and how pyngT-am evaluation will impact the next program and budget cycle. This description should include the roles of the H. key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timAf-ramag. A description of what strategy the district will use to specifically address the continuing shortfall of funding, and how this strategy will be incorporated into the ongoing long-range planning and budgeting process. This description should include the roles of the key participants, anticipated outcomes, and timeframes. SO ORDERED this day of June, 1993. UUITED STAlES DISTRICT JI iTRlCT JUDGE THJS ON__L- - / O '*ND/O^9(a) MD/OR 79(a) FRCP SY 1. -6-LRSD 1993-94 CERTIFIED SALARY INCREASES (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Base Salary Number of Cartlfled Positions Actual Aiveraoa Salary Actual Aweraga Step Increase Actual Aiveraoa Salary Raisa Aiveraoa Total Increasa (D-i-E) Haviaad AMeraoa SalaiY (C-i-F) Impact on Sudgat (BxF) Total Coat to Oiitilct (BxG) 16,000-21,000 21,001-26,000 26,001-31,000 31,001-36,000 36,001-41,000 41,001-56,000 56,001-61,000 61,001-76,000 76,001-61,000 81,001-86,000 TOTAL (J) 1993-94 Average Salary (A) The base salary will be used only for identifying employees within a certain salary range. (B) The number of positions column identifies the number of positions within that base salary range. (C) The actual average salary is an average salary for all the positions identified in column (B). (D) Actual average step increase is the averaged dollar amount received per position identified in column (B). (E) Actual average salary raise is the averaged dollar amount received for the across the board\" percentage raise per position identified in column (B). (F) Average total increase is the step increase plus the salary raise. This is the amount the district will pay \"over and above\" last year. (G) Revised (or adjusted) average salary is the average salary identified in column (C) plus the step increase, plus the salary raise. (H) The impact on the budget is the number of positions identified in column (B) times the average total increase, column (F). This is the additional amount the district will be paying during 1993-94 over what they paid in 1992-93 for the positions identified in column (B). (I) Total cost to district is the amount the district will pay for salaries of those positions identified in column (B) during 1993-94. (J) 1993-94 average salary is determined by dividing the total cost to district, column (I), by the number of positions, column (B).CONCPTOl REVISED 29 JUN 93 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS CONCEPT PAPER GENERAL CONCEPT A. Purpose. Given the complexity of present and future problems facing the district, it is absolutely essential that the best decision-making processes be in negotiate these troubled times. operation if we are to A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process would improve the chances that our limited revenue would be allocated rationally and would have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being well-spent. B. Description. In this process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, including legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2. Define our goals and objectives. 3. Define our programs to achieve those objectives, including those reguired by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure our performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making.A. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING 1. Purpose. This sub-process deals with the designation of an organizational structure and the assignment of staff responsibilities for carrying out the planning and budgeting activities. This designation and assignment should be in writing, and should be disseminated to all district employees. 2. Players. Cabinet is in a direct support role. The Superintendent has the lead, and the 3. Input. Look at the job reguirements and at the personnel resources available, and make best choice. 4. Description. Organization is the process of establishing lines of authority and assigning responsibility for work tasks to accomplish the objectives of the district. Staffing refers to the skills and background reguired of the assigned personnel to carry out the various planning activities described by the process. The Superintendent must designate a chief planner who will be responsible for developing and coordinating the planning and budgeting process. This designated planner and staff should be familiar with professional planning concepts and technigues. The designated planner would ensure that the process is followed, provide technical assistance, coordinate the process, prepare the document, collect reports, and advise the Superintendent and Board. The designated planner should also be responsible for ensuring all reguirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. 5. Output. The output is an organization chart, lines of authority, tasking assignment, and general timeframes for the process to be operational. 6. Timeframe. must be designated on front end. The first step in the process. The planner Once done, this sub-process will be revisited annually (preferably in early May) to make sure we are in the best configuration.B. NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. Purpose. In the needs assessment sub-process, the problems of the student/parent are identified. Teacher/administrator problems which are barriers to service delivery are also identified. \"need tl from II want II or II desire\", We must be able to distinguish 2. Players. needs assessment process. The designated planner will coordinate the leadership and direction for the process. The Superintendent will provide the The Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 3. Input. The data on the accepted planning factors and proportional allocation formula (enrollment projections, staffing criteria, capacity study, material allocations formula, other data) must be collected first. must be selected and implemented. Other needs assessment techniques It is critical that the desegregation plans and court orders be reduced to legal requirements which can be II hard coded II into the needs assessment until justification can be made to change them. 4. Description. Utilizing a combination of perceptual and empirical instruments, a range of input information and collected data would be analyzed to determine the needs of the students. parents, teachers, and administrators. The perceptual instruments might include various surveys, samplings, and hearings. The currently used Community Forums and District Dialogues would be used as the foundation of the perceptual instruments, and would be built on with possibly a selected mail survey. All perceptual issues identified must be crystallized into hard issues and cranked into the planning and budgeting process. The empirical instruments might include data on the accepted planning factors, the proportional allocation factors, various needs indicators (economic patterns, employment patterns, education patterns, family patterns, etc.), and review of other data. The desegregation plans and court orders will be dissected, and requirements will be extracted for incorporation into the needs assessment, converted into a listing on data. The data will be massaged and II needs\", keyed back to supporting 5. Output. The output of the needs assessment is a list of needs/problems, the description of the needs/problem, and supporting information on the needs/problem. These will be inputs to our goals and objectives determination, and will subsequently be the basis of programs. 6. Timeframe. in May with data collection. The needs assessment sub-process should begin September. Surveys should be completed by An initial needs listing should be drafted byOctober\nthe final listing must incorporate the results from the Community Forums and District Dialogues, should be published in December. The final listingC. PROGRAM INVENTORY 1. Purpose. This sub-process will identify all of the current programs and services being delivered and will consider their effectiveness. modification or elimination. Ineffective programs can be targeted for will be pointed out. Gaps and duplications in programs Resources, both inside and outside of the district, which can be utilized will be identified. 2. Players. The Superintendent would provide overall direction, and the Board would review the findings. The Cabinet and staff would collect all the basic data and prepare the data into documents for use in goal setting and program development. The designated planner would play a coordinating role. 3. Input. Current program documents, program evaluations. and various surveys would provide the baseline input data. The desegregation plans and court orders would be reviewed to ensure coverage. 4. Description. This sub-process is mainly a data collection and data manipulation activity in support of other sub-processes. The first phase of this sub-process is to inventory all existing programs to make sure all we are doing is included. This inventory would include a program definition. Program evaluations would be used to flag those programs which are failing to meet current goals and objectives. Staff would begin to compare the current programs with the preliminary needs to identify and flag gaps and duplications. It is most important that programs required under the desegregation plans and court orders be verified and status checked during this sub-process. Surveys would be used to identify all resources which can be used to address identified needs\nthis would become a bank\". II resources 5. Output. This sub-process would identify the programs and resources available to address the needs identified. The Program Inventory report would be generated, and this status of current programs would be utilized in the Goals and Objectives subprocess, the Program Development sub-process, and the Budgeting sub-process. 6. Timeframe. This sub-process would run concurrently with the Needs Assessment sub-process and the Goals and Objective sub- process. It must be completed before the Goals and Objective sub-process can be completed, completed in August. It would be started in May, and beD. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Purpose. The subprocess of setting goals and objectives is designed to establish a vision/mission for the district which would guide all actions by the administration. Supporting goals and objectives further define what the district wants to accomplish for the year, and any activity or expenditure which does not further satisfaction of these goals and objectives should be discarded. 2. Players. Setting the vision/mission and goals would be the purview of the Board and the Superintendent. They would receive assistance and support from the Cabinet members, and the Cabinet members would subsequently define objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals, would coordinate the sub-process. The designated planner 3. Input. The Board and Superintendent should utilize the needs listing generated by the needs assessment sub-process and the program resources generated by the program inventory. 4. Description. vision/mission of the district. The first step is to define the The vision/mission will establish the general value beliefs and educational purposes of the school organization. Given the direction, the needs, and the available services, the Board and Superintendent can determine what goals are consistent with the vision and are realistic with respect to accomplishment. Planning assumptions must be defined which will provide staff with more specific directions and considerations on how to proceed with programming and budgeting. Guidelines for the planning factors (staffing) and the proportional allocation formulas should be established/reviewed. Priorities must be established which will guide staff in program development, and which will be used to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting sub-process. The latter phase of this sub-process is characterized by the Cabinet working with staff to establish program objectives and evaluation criteria for each program in the district. items. 5. Output. The output of this sub-process consists of two First is the Goals Statement by the Board. This includes the written vision statement, the written goals, the written planning assumptions, and the written priorities. The initial calendar for the FY 93-94 planning and budgeting cycle should be published. This should all be in one document signed by the Board and the Superintendent. Second is the development of the specific program objectives and evaluation criteria for each program, and these will be incorporated into the planning and budgeting document. 6. Timeframe. This sub-process is dependent on the Needs Assessment sub-process and the Program Inventory sub-process, but will run concurrently with them. A preliminary goals statementshould be set by the Board during a planning session in June/July which will also establish the process and calendar for planning and budgeting for the coming year. The final Goals Statement should be issued in October. Program objectives and evaluation criteria should be established by November.E. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 1. Purpose. This sub-process is the decision-making stage where the results of all previous sub-processes are considered in an effort to develop new programs or modify current programs to meet the needs addressed by the defined goals. This is where we decide what we want to do and how we want to do it. 2. Players. Cabinet, and the staff. The key players are the Superintendent, the The role of the Superintendent is to provide leadership and guidance to ensure the goals are satisfied with the best possible programs. The Cabinet's role is to educate the administrative and school staff, and provide direction to those staff in developing and implementing creative. effective, and efficient programs. The designated planner is in a coordinating and monitoring role, and serve as the process advisor to the Superintendent. Input. 3. The sub-process will use the output of the Needs Assessment sub-process, the Program Inventory sub-process, and the Goals and Objectives sub-process. 4. Description. This sub-process is the point at which the district defines what programs will be provided. New programs may have to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. eliminated. Some programs may have to be direction to the staff. The Cabinet should outline the tasking and provide The best results will be obtained by allowing the staff to develop or modify the programs, and roll them up to the Cabinet. Decisions will have to be made on what programs will be provided, what the definition of the program will be, and what activities will be necessary to deliver the program. Since programs are selected to meet assessed needs. this is also a crucial time for designing the framework for program evaluation. The last step in this sub-process should be a final check to ensure all requirements from the desegregation plans and the court orders have been provided for by the program lineup. 5. Output. At this point, all of the elements of a good program planning document have been completed\nvision, goals, programs, program definition, program objectives, activities, and evaluation criteria. This material will be used for budget development, and will be directly input into the program planning and budgeting document. 6. Timeframe. This sub-process may run somewhat concurrent with the Goals and Objectives sub-process, but cannot be finished until the Goals and Objectives sub-process has been completed. This sub-process should start in September, and be completed in early February.F. BUDGETING 1. Purpose. The Budgeting sub-process is the resource allocation function. Money and other resources are allocated to the programs identified in the Program Development sub-process to address the needs identified in the Needs Assessment subprocess . 2. Players. authority on the budget. The Board is the ultimate decision-making The Superintendent is the leader of the sub-process by ensuring a balanced budget meeting the needs and goals of the students and parents is presented to the Board. The Cabinet is deeply involved in programmatic decisions and matching the budget dollars to the programs. The Business Manager will coordinate the budget preparation, and the designated planner will ensure the planning and budgeting pieces come together. The budget managers will provide input into the sub-process, rolling the budget up to the next level, budget information. The Controller will produce the 3. Input. Many sources of information will be used in this sub-process: needs assessment information, planning factors, proportional allocation factors, previous expenditures, program requirements, public input, desegregation plan and court order requirements. 4. Description. Budgeting involves allocating money and assigning personnel and facilities to effect the programs and goals set in the previous steps. As a result of the allocations made, some changes in developed programs may be necessary, programs define both current year operations and planning The assumptions for the future. The budget should continue with this by projecting a multi-year revenue and expense picture based on these assumptions. formulas should be reviewed each year, fiscal allocations should be consistent. Planning factors and proportional allocation Planning priorities and Maximum input should be solicited from staff and parents regarding allocations. budget issue and major addition/change/deletion should be Each supported with a written business case outlining the decision- making process. Each identified program must be separately coded for expenditure collection so that programs may be monitored by performance and cost throughout the fiscal year. 5. Output. In one sense, the allocation of resources in the Budgeting sub-process ends the planning phase and begins the implementation phase. The output is a multi-dimensional budget document which will be used to satisfy the traditional budgeting and accounting requirements, with a program planning and budgeting component which will link the programs and budget allocations. 6. Timeframe. Nov...financial forecasts for next and out-yearsNov...review planning factors and proportional allocation formula results Dec... submission of budget requests by budget managers Feb...complete budget development Mar. revise financial forecast Mar... finalize add/change/deletes and business cases Apr...tentative budget to board Jul...Adopt budget Aug... submit to stateG. PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT 1. Purpose. The primary purpose of preparing the program budget document (Program Operations Plan) is to develop rational planning and effective resource allocation. The document should provide a road map for getting from needed and required programs, through funding, to the destination of the related goal. 2. Players. The Board will review the plan in relationship to the stated goals, and give final approval of the plan. The Superintendent provides overall guidance for the development of the plan. The Cabinet members provide all the program information for their respective areas. The Business Manager provides the financial numbers that match the programs. The designated planner puts together the work plan and coordinates the documentation into the final product. 3. Input. on the results of the The initial program budgeting document is built tt work. deseg audit It and the program definition The program budget document resulting from this cycle will incorporate this initial document but will be the synthesis of all previous key outputs\nthe needs assessment, the program inventory, the goals and objectives, new program definitions, and budget allocations. 4. Description. Although the preparation of the program budget document is not usually considered part of the planning process, it is included here as the culmination and documentation of the other planning sub-processes, aspects must be mutually supportive. The planning and budgeting We want the plan to be a useful and living document which can satisfy several purposes and be readily changed as the environment changes. While the planning module should remain fixed for the year, the format should be used to facilitate regular monitoring and reporting. An example of some things which might be included in the plan would be: an introduction about the plan\nplanning process description\nidentification of the needs of the district and a description of how those needs were identified\ndescription and objectives of the programs\nactivities/strategies on how the programs will operate\nevaluation criteria of the programs\nanalysis of the needs in relation to the available funding\nbudget allocations for the programs\ndescription of how the plan will be impacted\ndescription of how the goals will be impacted\nand major issues for the future. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for every identified program. would also be assigned. A secondary leader The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities or strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reporting. 5. Output. The program budget document will be the output.This document will become the basis for follow-on monitoring and reporting, and will become the guide for any interim decisionmaking activity. 6. Timeframe. Development of the document should begin around December, and should be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April.H. MONITORING AND REPORTING 1. Purpose. This sub-process should be designed to provide decision-makers with a regular flow of information on the district's progress toward accomplishing its stated goals and objectives. The reporting should be designed to satisfy both internal requirements as well as the reporting requirements under the desegregation plans. 2. Players. The Board and the Superintendent would be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decision-making. The designated planner would coordinate the sub-process and prepare the composite report. the matching financial information by program. The Business Manager would supply The Cabinet and staff would prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 3. Input. The program budget document (Program Operations Plan) would be the basis for the monitoring and reporting, and would establish the format and design. Cabinet members will provide performance reports from which the designated planner can prepare the composite report, from the Business Manager. Financial information would come 4. Description. Extending the format and content of the program budget document (Program Operations Plan), a sub-process of regular monitoring and reporting would be established immediately. By using the same format, we can reduce the production overhead of the reporting as well as satisfying all parties. ease of function. The reporting mechanism would be set up on diskette for The sub-process would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a guarterly basis. The Board could choose to review in depth a certain program at each Board meeting, but still have performance reporting information on all programs. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is complete. Such a process would also facilitate modification of both the program plan and the desegregation plans. Additionally, performance history will be built as a matter of regular business rather than a situational special effort. We would have a comprehensive listing of all the good things we have done, in addition to the bad, and take some credit along with the blame. 5. Output. A quarterly composite progress report on all identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. Would be an extension of the program budget document (Program Operations Plan). 6. Timeframe. Work on the sub-process would begin immediately, with the first set of actual reports generated in early October covering the period July/August/September. quarter reports would be due in January, April, and July. PriorI. PROGRAM EVALUATION 1. Purpose. we are doing. This sub-process is where we find out how well Program evaluation will provide us an assessment of the program's performance for decision-making purposes. It will tell us if our program is meeting the stated objectives and having the impact intended. We can go one step further with a program analysis which would tell us whether the program should be cut or improved, and the best options for achieving the latter. 2. Players. The Board and the Superintendent are the recipients of the evaluations, and will use them in determining direction and resource allocation. The designated planner would coordinate the sub-process and be the keeper of the documentation. financial information. The Business Manager would supply the supporting The Cabinet and staff would prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 3. Input. General directions and targets from the Board\nspecific targets from Superintendent. Program planning information, including evaluation criteria and program objectives will be used in developing the evaluations. 4. Description. At least during the first year of the planning and budgeting process, there should be two, concurrent and parallel program evaluation components working\na regular evaluation component and a It fast-track If evaluation component. into each program. The regular program evaluation component would be built As programs are put in place, they would contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Evaluation would continue to get better as we improve our ability to develop and monitor evaluation criteria. Special or more detailed evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent with the intent of looking deeply into a programs workings. Since little or no program evaluation of the regular type is in operation at this time, information is needed upon which to base critical near-term decisions. To address this information need. II fast-track II designated programs which might be suspect. evaluations should be performed on identified for II fast-track II Programs should be and direction of the district. if they have high impact on the goals II fast-track II Some possible candidates for evaluations might be as follows: incentive school operations, school closing, student assignment process, construction of Stephen, outsourcing support services, special evaluations from this year. Utilizing the program evaluation information, business cases would be prepared for decision-making in the areas of program modification, program development, and program elimination. 5. Output. Specific program evaluations. These would be used as input into the next planning cycle as well as input intobusiness cases for making modifications in resource allocation or totally eliminating the program. 6. Timeframe. This sub-process should begin after the Board defines district goals in July, and should continue until input time into the Program Inventory sub-process. n Fast-track\" evaluations might continue until the initial decision point in the Budgeting sub-process, in January.J. BROAD-BASED INPUT AND PARTICIPATION 1. Purpose. Broad-based education, participation, review and comment provide an opportunity for persons outside the immediate planning process organization to assist in preparing the plan\nand to review and comment on the plan, the planning process and decisions such as those that affect the allocation of resources. 2. Players. The Board and the Superintendent should provide direction on the type and extent to which broad-based input and participation should be utilized in the various sub-processes. This should be done at the initial summer planning session. Communications Director, working closely with the designated planner, should develop an input and participation plan and The implement it in conjunction with the efforts of the designated planner. 3. Input. Direction from the Board and Superintendent. 4. Description. This sub-process is one in which we seek to get maximum input and participation from as many informed sources as possible, both inside and outside of the district organization. There should be a plan, developed and coordinated by the Communications Director with assistance from the designated planner, for obtaining input and participation from other sources for each of the sub-processes. The more front-end participation, the better the buy-in on the back side. We should take every opportunity to use information to educate the general public and removed staff on the planning and budgeting process and the contents of the Program Budget Document. There are a number of possible input sources which might be called upon to participate in one or more of the sub- processes. A partial list follows: the Community Forums and District Dialogues for needs assessment, the building coordinating committees, the budget committee, the Magnet Review Committee, the bi-racial committee, the PTA, the ODM, and Joshua. The Communications Director should identify those sources which would be most appropriate for each sub-process, and work with the designated planner on building the best input mechanism. 5. Output. Each source would have a different method of providing participation and input into each of the sub-processes. Thus, the output would vary depending on the situation. 6. Timeframe. Since some form of broad-based input and participation might be solicited in each sub-process, process would be ongoing. this sub-K. PROGRAM COORDINATION 1. Purpose. The planning and budgeting effort must be closely coordinated so as to maximize the use of available resources in meeting the needs of the students and parents, minimize of duplication and gaps in programs, and ensure all district efforts are aimed at the district goals. 2. Players. The designated planner is the leader in this sub-process, and must be a close advisor to the Board and Superintendent. The designated planner must keep the Board and the Superintendent informed as to what is being done and where we stand relative to achieving our goals. The Board and the Superintendent must exercise oversight authority on the process and allocate resources accordingly. Additionally, the Superintendent must support the designated planner and ensure all district staff are aggressively working on the completion of the plan. 3. Input. Superintendent. District goals, direction from the Board and 4. Description. which relates to all other activities. Program Coordination is a key activity Each of the planning activities such as needs assessment, program development and budgeting would be coordinated with similar activities in the other sub-processes. Since there would be many participants in the entire process, it is most critical that all of the pieces fit together and support each other. This coordination is achieved by having a designated planner who will develop project plans for the overall process and each sub-process, monitor the progress against those project plans, and provide progress reporting back to the Board and Superintendent. The designated planner is there to make sure everything happens on time, not necessarily to do it. 5. Output. Project plans and status reports. Should be a part of the regular monitoring and reporting sub-process. 6. Timeframe. A start to finish sub-process. Ongoing.L. RESTART CYCLE 1. Purpose. The program planning and budgeting cycle is a continuous process, and would be the heart of the way we manage the business of the district. Once the cycle for one fiscal year is complete, the next cycle begins\nin fact, there is actually some overlap.CONCPT02 REVISED 29 JUN 93 PROPOSED PLANNING AND BUDGET CALENDAR JULY 1993 - Designate planner and job responsibilities - Board/Cabinet workshop on planning and budgeting\ntentative district goals defined, identify \"fast-track It evaluation targets, define guidelines on broad-based input, design planning and budgeting calendar - Proposed planning factors and proportional allocation formulas identified, published, and data collection begins - Planning and budget calendar published - Begin development of the monitoring and reporting procedures - Begin Program Inventory using tl - Begin \"fast-track II evaluations deseg audit tt as baseline AUGUST 1993 - Complete Program Inventory - Complete monitoring and reporting procedures, and issue instructions - Board reviews planning factors and proportional allocation formulas Continue \"fast-track evaluations SEPTEMBER 1993 - Complete needs assessment surveys Continue fast-track tl evaluations - Begin Program Development OCTOBER 1993 - Needs listing finalized - Board approves planning factors and proportional allocation formulas - Enrollment statistics and projections published - First quarter FY93-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report published - Board issues final Goals Statement - Continue Program Development Continue tl fast-track It evaluations - Begin Community Forum input on programs and budgets - Begin District Dialogues input on programs and budgets NOVEMBER 1993 - Board issues directions and assumptions for budgetpreparation - Initial financial forecasts prepared - Base budgets and budget instructions generated and distributed - Program objectives and evaluation criteria finalized for each program - Review planning factors and proportional allocation formula results Continue fast-track II evaluations - Continue Program Development - Continue Community Forum input on programs and budgets - Continue District Dialogues input on programs and budgets - Continue Community Forum input on programs and budgets DECEMBER 1993 - Complete District Dialogues input on programs and budgets - Complete Community Forum input on programs and budgets - Complete needs assessment listing - Budget managers submit budget requests Continue II fast-track\" evaluations - Continue Program Development - Begin developing program budget document (Program Operations Plan) JANUARY 1994 - Complete \"fast-track II evaluations - Second quarter FY93-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report published - Continue developing the Program Budget Document - Continue budget request review and budget development - Continue Program Development - Begin identification of major budget issues and development of business cases FEBRUARY 1994 - Complete program development - Complete budget development and business case development - Continue developing the program budget document (Program Operations Plan) MARCH 1994 - Revise financial forecasts - Revise the program budget document (Program Operations Plan) - Finalize budget issue recommendations and business case on each issue - Feedback to all input participantsAPRIL 1994 - Complete the program budget document (Program Operations Plan) - Revise budget - Board workshop on budget - Submit tentative budget to Board - Certified personnel reduction deadline - Third quarter FY93-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report published MAY 1994 - Revise budget - Non-certified personnel reduction deadline - Board workshop on budget - Board approves tentative budget - Reassess planning organization for FY94-95 cycle - Begin FY94-95 cycle needs assessment - Begin program inventory for FY94-95 cycle JUNE 1994 - Revise to final budget - Court hearing on budget - Continue FY94-95 cycle needs assessment - Continue FY94-95 cycle program inventory JULY 1994 - Board adopts final budget - Fourth quarter FY93-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report published - FY94-95 cycle Board workshop on planning and budgeting - Continue FY94-95 cycle needs assessment - Continue FY94-95 cycle program inventory AUGUST 1994 - Complete FY94-95 cycle program inventory - Submit final budget to State - Board reviews planning factors and proportional allocation formulas for FY94-95 cycle - Continue FY94-95 cycle needs assessmentRECEP- ,11)1 2i 0ic9 Qi Desegregaiion Moniicrina IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 ' PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF FILING The Plaintiff, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Notice of Filing, states: On June 15, 1993, an Order was entered directing the LRSD to prepare and submit detailed documents, records and information by certain designated dates. The LRSD timely submitted the information required by June 28, 1993 and the information required by June 30, 1993. The Order further required the LRSD to submit, by July 30, 1993, a written plan for the long-range planning and budget process to be used in developing the 1994-95 budget. The Order contained specific items to be included in that document. Filed herewith as Exhibit 1 are copies of the program planning and budgeting document prepared by the LRSD in response to the Order of the Court. The submission is dated July 30, 1993. The document was presented, discussed and approved by the LRSD Board ofDirectors in a special meeting of the board on Wednesday, July 28, 1993 . Respectfully submitted. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas (501) 376-2011 72201-3493 Attorneys for Plaintiff LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BY: ^Hferry L. Malone Bar ID No. 85096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Filing has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 29th day of July, 1993. Jerry L. Malone Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 -2-Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry L. Malone -3- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 July 30, 1993 To: Board of Directors From: Estelle Matthr lis, II nterim Superintendent Subject: Planning Program and Budgeting Document Please find attached a copy of the long-range planning program and budgeting document being submitted to the Court pursuant to its June 15, Order. 1993. This document was filed with the Court on July 29, If you have questions, please contact Jerry Malone. EM: nr Enclosures c: Jerry L. MaloneAUG G - 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date: August 5, 1993 To: From: Jeanette Wagner, Director of Communications Sterling Ingram,^irector Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Program Planning and Budgeting Tasks Attached is a copy of the Planning and Budgeting document which was submitted to the court on July 29, 1993. Although the document has not been approved, I expect the basic framework will not be changed. On page 3 of Attachment 4, you will find that Community Forums and District Dialogue sessions will be conducted as part of the needs assessment process. You have been identified as one of the persons responsible for this task. Please plan for three area school forums instead of one for a total of five community forums, an addition that the Board wanted. This was As the lead planning person for the planning and budgeting process, I am requesting that as you make plans for the 1993-94 school year, please include the necessary strategies, timelines, etc. in your management plan which will be included in the budget document. bjg cc: Estelle Matthis Jerry Malone I PROJECT PLAN PROJECT: PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS 8/23/93 1PROJECT\nPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS People involved Bill Mooney Board Estelle Matthis Sterling Ingram Program leaders Jeanette Wagner Hank Williams Mark Milhollen Brady Gadberry Budget Managers Project goals Develop and implement a long range planning and budgeting process that links programs/obligations and fund allocations and expenditures beginning with FY 94-95. Project notes Major job components\na. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a needs assessment process that incorporates both legal obligations and other programs. b. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a process that results in a planning document, based on the needs assessment, whcih qualifies existing programs/obligations and identifies new programs to meet defined goals and objectives\nand which defines programs/obligations in terms of purpose, evaluation criteria and methods, ownership, priorities, and time lines. c. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a budget process that links plan programs/obligations and funding allocations for budgeting and expense reporting analysis\nthat identifies and allocates all financial resources\nthat provides regular review of progress and expenditures\nthat provides a method of initiating modifications to program/obligations and budgets. d. Assist the LRSD in developing and Implementing a process for program and expenditure evaluation for decision-making. 2TASK LIST PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS 11 phases 66 tasks ORG AND STAFFING C Designate district planner Hire PRE Specialist Train PRE Specialist NEEDS ASSESSMENT Set schedule for Community Forums Develop Community Forum sample agenda Develop data collection tool for Forums Set schedule for District Dialogues Develop District Dialogue sample agenda Develop data collection tool for Dialogues Merge input data PROGRAM INVENTORY Complete Desegregation Audit Copy of Desegregation Audit to Court C Prep non-deseg program listing Merge Deseg audit into PPBD Submit status report on prog obj \u0026amp; eval cri Publish initial prog inventory report Submit proposal for grouping non-deseg programs Develop non-deseg program groups Merge deseg and non-deseg program listings Publish final prog inventory report GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C Obtain copies of current mission statement C Obtain copies of current goals Hold Cabinet work session Hold Board work session PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT BUDGETING PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMEN C Revise form, instructions, and definitions Approval on form, instructions, and definitions Diskette of form, inst, and def to Ingram Initial data load to diskettes Prepare training material Conduct training sessions Distribute diskettes to program leaders Diskettes due back to Ingram Data check on diskettes Clean up period 3Obtain feedback on training Modify training as necessary Send draft to ODM for plan verification Report publication MONITORING/REPORTING Run financial pull test on August data Modify process as necessary Prepare M/R instructions Prepare M/R training material Conduct M/R training Set up financial pull for October report Distribute M/R reports M/R reports returned M/R reports reviewed and corrected Prepare front section of 1st Qtr Rpt 1st Qtr report prepared Distribute 1st qtr report Obtain feedback on training sessions PROGRAM EVALUATION Review Deseg Plans for possible targets Develop evaluation format Approval on evaluation format Publish evaluation format Identify tl Fast-Track tl Tasking on tl Fast-Track eval targets It evaluation targets INPUT/PARTICIPATION Define input requirements at Board session PROGRAM COORDINATION C Complete Requirements Definition Questionnaire Revise Req Def listing Approval for interviews Requirements Definition interviewing Merge requirements into process design Update Mooney proposal Set up Cabinet work session Set up Board work session 4ASSIGNMENTS PHASE 1: ORG AND STAFFING Task People assigned C Designate district planner Estelle Matthis Hire PRE Specialist Sterling Ingram Train PRE Specialist Sterling Ingram PHASE 2: NEEDS ASSESSMENT Task People assigned Set schedule for Community Forums Sterling Ingram Develop Community Forum sample agenda Sterling Ingram Develop data collection tool for Forums Sterling Ingram Set schedule for District Dialogues Sterling Ingram Develop District Dialogue sample agenda Sterling Ingram Develop data collection tool for Dialogues Sterling Ingram Merge input data Sterling Ingram 5PHASE 3: PROGRAM INVENTORY Task People assigned Complete Desegregation Audit Sterling Ingram Copy of Desegregation Audit to Court Sterling Ingram C Prep non-deseg program listing Bill Mooney Merge Deseg audit into PPBD Sterling Ingram Submit status report on prog obj \u0026amp; eval cri Sterling Ingram Publish initial prog inventory report Sterling Ingram Submit proposal for grouping non-deseg programs Bill Mooney Develop non-deseg program groups Sterling Ingram Merge deseg and non-deseg program listings Sterling Ingram Publish final prog inventory report Sterling Ingram PHASE 4: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Task People assigned C Obtain copies of current mission statement Bill Mooney C Obtain copies of current goals Bill Mooney Hold Cabinet work session Estelle Matthis Hold Board work session Estelle Matthis 6PHASE 5: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Task People assigned PHASE 6: BUDGETING Task People assigned 7PHASE 7: PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMEN Task People assigned C Revise form, instructions, and definitions Bill Mooney Approval on form, instructions, and definitions Sterling Ingram Diskette of form, inst, and def to Ingram Bill Mooney Initial data load to diskettes Sterling Ingram Prepare training material Sterling Ingram Conduct training sessions Sterling Ingram Distribute diskettes to program leaders Sterling Ingram Diskettes due back to Ingram Program leaders Data check on diskettes Sterling Ingram Clean up period Program leaders Obtain feedback on training Sterling Ingram Modify training as necessary Sterling Ingram Send draft to ODM for plan verification Sterling Ingram Report publication Sterling Ingram 8PHASE 8\nMONITORING/REPORTING Task People assigned Run financial pull test on August data Mark Milhollen Modify process as necessary Sterling Ingram Prepare M/R instructions Sterling Ingram Prepare M/R training material Sterling Ingram Conduct M/R training Sterling Ingram Set up financial pull for October report Mark Milhollen Distribute M/R reports Sterling Ingram M/R reports returned Budget Managers M/R reports reviewed and corrected Sterling Ingram Prepare front section of 1st Qtr Rpt Sterling Ingram 1st Qtr report prepared Program leaders Distribute 1st qtr report Sterling Ingram Obtain feedback on training sessions Sterling Ingram 9PHASE 9: PROGRAM EVALUATION Task People assigned Review Deseg Plans for possible targets Sterling Ingrain Develop evaluation format Sterling Ingram Approval on evaluation format Estelle Matthis Publish evaluation format Sterling Ingram Identify It Fast-Track It eval targets Board Estelle Matthis Hank Williams Tasking on tl Fast-Track evaluation targets Estelle Matthis PHASE 10: INPUT/PARTICIPATION Task People assigned Define input reguirements at Board session Board 10PHASE 11: PROGRAM COORDINATION Task People assigned C Complete Requirements Definition Questionnaire Bill Mooney Revise Req Def listing Bill Mooney Approval for interviews Estelle Matthis Requirements Definition interviewing Bill Mooney Merge requirements into process design Bill Mooney Update Mooney proposal Bill Mooney Set up Cabinet work session Estelle Matthis Set up Board work session Estelle Matthis 11swtt! r ^5.A ^.^4 /wi-r F *1 I* ti -3 * 5 A  .3 -  AUG 2 7 1S?3 of Ltepitofing IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION , filed *I8 2 6WJ CARL fl. brents. CLERK Oy\n\\' ''. 1 r LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Cli vs. No. LR-C-82866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL ORDER PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS On July 7-8, 1993 and again on August 12-13, 1993, the Court held hearings on the Little Rock School District's (\"LRSD\") budget for the 1993-94 school year. This Court has previously expressed concern that it cannot meet its obligation to monitor desegregation plan compliance until the LRSD implements a budgeting process that yield a budget which reflects the district's careful planning for meeting its desegregation obligations over the full span of the settlement agreement. Having heard testimony over the course of the two hearings, the Court commends the LRSD for initiating, with the help of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, budgeting and long- range planning processes. The Court acquiesces in the implementation of the budget for the following two reasons: (1) the LRSD budget for the technically balanced, and 1993-94 school year is (2) the LRSD considered its desegregation obligations in the budget, although there remain certain areas of concern. The Court continues to be concerned with the tremendously large budget deficits the LRSD projects for future years These deficits i -are brought about partly by recurring expenditures that are funded through non-recurring revenue sources, a practice that threatens to jeopardize the district's ability to fund its desegregation obligations in the future. The Court also notes that, although the LRSD succeeded in creating a balanced budget, the district was able to do so by using extraordinary one-time budget balancing strategies that do not represent lasting budget reductions. One example of such budgetary practices is the way in which the district drained its Risk Management Loss Program to create additional revenue for the 1993-94 fiscal year. This fund, which the LRSD established to pay deductibles associated with losses not covered by insurance premiums, had accumulated a reserve. The LRSD transferred $500,000 from this reserve into the revenue side of the budget to shore up the sagging bottom line. However, the district will not be able to implement this strategy on an annual basis. See Exhibit 1-B, June 28, 1993 Submission. Although the district has termed such maneuvers \"Major Deficit Reduction Actions,\" most are actually one-time budget reduction tactics that do little or nothing to remedy the predicted out-year shortfalls. This type of financial manipulation only allows the district to delay making the difficult budget decisions that will alleviate the projected deficits. The Court is also particularly concerned about the following budget items that represent reductions in previous program or department funding levels and thereby create the potential for negatively affecting the desegregation plan\n(1) Office of Communications: The Interdistrict plan states 2that  [d]esegregation will succeed only so far as the community supports and participates in it,\" and \"[a] community well-informed about its schools, and their desegregation, is more willing to place confidence in them and to participate in various aspects of desegregation-related initiatives and activities\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_617","title":"Program planning and budgeting process","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","School employees","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting process"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/617"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n- IRC  TEL : 501-324-0504 Oct 0193 15:11 No .004 P.Ol LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Date: September 30, 1993 To: All principals From: Sterling Ingram, Director Subject: Instructions for completing Program Budget Document In order to standardize procedures for reporting achievements (evidence) of the strategies on the Program Budget Document, the following instructions are provided. 1. Responsibilities of Principals Principals are expected to document the achievement of strategies only where \"Principal\" or \"District is stipulated in the \"Responsibility\" Principals are Staff 11 column of the Program Budget Document. responsible for inputting information in only three\nstrategies. Beginning Date and Completion The diagram below shows the relative columns (3) columns: Date. for inputting information by principals. strategies Beginning Date Completion Date 2. Submission to Assistant superintendents Your diskette should be forwarded to the assigned 1993 assistant superintendents on or before the second Thursday following the end of the quarter (i.e. Thursday, October 14, 1993, for this quarter). The assistant superintendents will compile the information to form a district-wide report that will be keyed into a master School Operations diskette. 3. Return to Schools Your diskette will be returned to you after a paper copy has been extracted for office use.ik'c' TEL :501-324-0504 Oct 0193 15:11 No .004 P.02 Memo to Principals September 30, 1993 Page 2 4. Placement of Achievements (Evidence) on the Program Budget Documents Evidence of the achievements should be placed underneath the II Strategies\" column. Use alpha order to list achievements underneath strategies (A._______ B., etc.) where the principal or district staff has been specified as the responsible person. REMEMBER\nThe achievements will continue to grow underneath each strategy until the information for that particular strategy is completed. See the Sample of Achievements Documentation below for selected objectives and selected corresponding strategies for further clarification. sample of Achievements Documentation OBJECTIVE STRATEGIES 1. To ensure an organizational structure which provides equal opportunity and access for parents,students and staff. 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to ensure sufficient support for students and staff success and for the implementation of the desegregation plan. 3.1 Mini-seminars at PTA meetings and in the community. A. PTA Mini-Seminars Agenda, October 10 5. Beginning Date Each achievement should have a corresponding beginning date (MM/DD/YY) , example: 09/28/93.\" IRC' TEL:501-324-0504 Oct 0193 15:12 No .004 P.03 Memo to Principals September 30, 1993 Page 3 6. 8. 7 . Completion Date An actual date (MM/DD/YY) , example: 11/14/93, will document when an achievement was completed. If an achievement has been started but not completed, give an approximate guess for the percent of completion, example: 75%. Limited Achievements for This Reporting Quarter Identify only achievements which have been completed during this quarter (July 1 - September 30). Every strategy is not expected to show achievements at this early date. Laser Printers Are Required for Hard Copies Only laser printers are capable of producing hard copies (photocopies) of the information entered onto However, some laser printers in the the diskettes. schools are not capable of printing the WordPerfect Program Budget Document. For those schools not having printing capabilities for this document. Planning Research and Evaluation will provide a hard copy upon request. REMINDER: _________ If you are confused, do not forget to refer to the three (3) sets of definitions for the Program Budget Document given you at the inservice. As a final note, schools are expected to present only achievements which are succinct and meaningful. Blank forms of the Program Budget Document are enclosed. If you have content questions concerning this memorandum, contact Marjorie Bassa at 324-2120. If you have technical questions concerning the Program Budget Document, contact Dennis Glasgow at 324-0518. drg Enclosures cc: Assistant SuperintendentsTRAIN06 REVISED 07 OCT 93 PROJECT OBJECTIVE Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a long range planning and budgeting process that links programs/ obligations and fund allocations and expenditures beginning with FY 94-95. 1. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a needs assessment process that incorporates both legal obligations and other programs. 2. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a process that results in a planning document, based on the needs assessment, which qualifies existing programs/ obligations and identifies new programs to meet defined goals and objectives\nand which defines programs/ obligations in terms of purpose, evaluation criteria and methods, ownership, priorities, and timelines. 3. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a budget process that links plan programs/obligations and funding allocations for budgeting and expense reporting analysis\nthat identifies and allocates all financial resources\nthat provides regular review of progress and expenditures\nthat provides a method of initiating modifications to program/ obligations and budgets. 4. Assist the LRSD in developing and implementing a process for program and expenditure evaluation for decision-making.X J mo PUNNING AND BUOGHING PSOCESS A B Program Coordination  Bro ad-leased Iniput and Participation a C  E T Organization and StaPfinsr Needs Assessnent PrograR Inventory \u0026lt; 0  PrograM DevelopMent Budgeting Goals and 01\u0026gt;JectivesG  Prograw Budget BocuMent H Honitoriny and Reporting I Progran Evaluation L Itestart cycleACTIVITIES July Aug. 19 9 3 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. PLANNIMG AND BUDGETING CYCLE Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Hay 19 9 4 June Needs Assessment Begins July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Har. 19 9 5 Apr. Hay June July Aug. Program Inventory Begins Ha Loa Is/Ob5ec11ves Development Program Development Budgeting Budget Document Monitoring and Reporting (prior quarterly reports) Program Evaluation 1 iTRAIN09 REVISED 07 OCT 93 AUTOMATED PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS PROJECT KICKSTART MICROSOFT PROJECT FOR WINDOWS...windows...excellent SUPERPROJECr...DOS...WINDOWS...EXCELLENT INSTAPLAN...DOS PROJECT SCE TO 'ULER..DOS ON TARGET-WINDOWS PRIMAVERA..DOS PROTRACS...DOS..JLIMITED CAPABILITY TIME LINE...DOS...WINDOWS LOTUS AGENDA..DOS...LIMITED CAPABILITYTRAIN08 REVISED 07 OCT 93 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS CHECKOFF LIST STUFF TO DO TASK LISTING SEQUENTIAL LIST OF TASK/PERSON/TIME GANTT CHART TYPE BASED ON HORIZONTAL TIME PERT PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE CPM CRITICAL PATH METHOD - TIME - MATERIAL - PERSONNELTRAIN07 REVISED 07 OCT 93 BENEFITS OF PPBS PROCESSES 1. LONG RANGE PLANNING BECOMES ROUTINE 2. PLANS AND PROGRAMS REVIEWED CONTINUOUSLY 3. CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAMS AND PURPOSES 4. INTER-DEPARTMENT COORDINATION STRENGTHENED 5. PROGRAM EVALUATION ESTABLISHED 6. PROGRAM EVALUATION BASED ON GOALSSTPROGOl REVISED 10 AUG 93 SHORT TERM PROJECT PROGRAM DEFINITION PURPOSE: Develop a template for definition, purpose, and measurements. program identification. TASKS TAR ACT 1. Review Bernd tasking memo. 4/12 4/13 2 . audit. Sterling Ingram. Determine his plans for Bernd 4/14 4/14 3. Sterling Ingram. Get copy of Barksdale material. 4/14 4/14 4 . Volunteer assistance and define role. 4/14 4/14 5. Review Barksdale material. 4/16 4/14 6. Sterling Ingram. Draft project plan for audit. 4/19 CANC 7 . Complete research on template items. 4/20 4/23 8. Design template, definitions, and examples. 4/28 4/28 9. Approval of template design. 4/30 CANC 10. plan. Work with Sterling Ingram on completing project CANC 11. project. Deadline on decision from Sterling Ingram on 5/7 5/10 12. Draft initial document for Cabinet on program definition and listing. Distribute. 5/11 5/17 13. Cabinet returns mark-up of program listing. 5/24 CANC Date due is 5/24. 14. Meeting to verify and clean-up. 6/21 6/21 15. Program identification deadline. 6/1 Pass 16. Meet with Morgan on financial coding requirements. 6/23 6/30 17. Distribute final draft for review and comment. Date due back is 7/9 7/2 7/218. Get final mark-ups back from cabinet members. 7/9 7/9 19. Complete any final changes, and finalize program listing. 7/14 7/12 20. Get sign-off from Superintendent. 7/16 7/16 21. Distribute final program listing. 5/28 7/19 22. Meet with Milhollen on re-coding programs. 6/1 6/21 23. Meet with Ingram on template/report design. 7/1 7/21 24. Finalize Program Planning and Budgeting Document and reporting format. 8/16 25. Provide Ingram with complete diskette. 8/23gut Little Rock School District Human Resources Implementation Plan 10 6 Task Desorption Development al Human Resources System Marural I 8^15 [ 6^2 I I 95 Septwnber | Octobw | Novembw | DcmbM f I 9'12 I aUS I 326 I 103 I 1010 | 1CV17 | 1024 | \u0026lt;0/31 | 11/7 | 11/14 | llgl | KgS | 12/5 | 12/12 | 12/19 | 12/26 January I 1g I 1/9 I 1/16 12 DevelqM Needed Forms 5 One on One Meetings with Principals and Department Heads 13 Review and Revise New Forms 9 Oevelope Implementation Plan 14 Prepare Job Descriptions and Expectations 17 Prepare user material 19 Develcpe Education Materials for Users 20 Padtc^ manual for Approval 28 Upgrade tables for CIMSIII - Application System 10 Desigrtale Project Leader 15 Review arxf Revise Job Description and Etqdectatiora 18 Devekpe Education Plan for Users 27 Print rtew coding manuals 1 Hire Hurrwi Resource Director 24 trrplement job desc. \u0026amp; expec. thru mtgs with HR staff 25 Transition for HR Ststfl 26 Forms Printing 29 Print users manuals 8 Corrpletion ol New Forms 16 Education Plan for HR Staff 11 Briefing of HR Director 21 Receive approval for manual and reorganization 22 Anrxxincement to HR SteA 23 Anrxxjrtcemenl toOistrid 2 Reorganization Meetings w/ HR 3 Human Resources Trainirtg 4 Announce Reorganizdion lo Customers 7 Procedures for Prirx^tpals and Budget Marwgers Project: Date\n9/17/93 Critical iiiiiininirniin] Noncritical K\u0026lt;\u0026lt;y:iiiiiiii1 iiiiaiiiiiiiiii K^llllll bnnnni] Hl 111111111 lllllllll lllllllll tn  mnnnmiiinin] B 1 nun mi fnrmnriii rrTrnn.TrTTi tllllllllHIII lllllllllllll B I I I I Progress Milestone e Summary V  Page 1 Date: 9/17/93gust Little Rock School District Human Resources Implementation Plan D 33 Task Description Personnel Coordirutfors' problem log establshed I September I October I November I December arts I a/22 I aoa I as | ari2 | 9/19 | aes | 103 | wio | nvi7 | 1024 | 1031 | 11Z7 [ iizu | 11/21 | n/za | las | iznz | raw [ \\2ix Jenuery I 1/2 i 1S I 1/16 31 Otstrfcule new coding manuals OnTfTl X Distrbule new forms 32 Set irrplementetfion hot-Gne mn HD 34 Modify training and manuals based on prcfclem logs IIIIIHI u im 35 Conduct foHow-on training if necessary I Project: Date: 9/17/93 Critical nrrniriiTunnTn Noncriticai Progress Milestone Summary V Page 2 Date: 9/17/93ID Task Description 12 Develope Needed Forms 10 Designate Project Leader 9 Develope Implementation Plan 17 Prepare user matenal 13 Review and Revise New Forms 18 Develope Education Plan tor Users 5 One on One Meetings with Princtpais and Department Heads 14 Prepare Job Descriptions and Expectations 1 Hire Human Resource Director 6 Development of Human Resources System Manual 8 Completion ol New Forms 16 Education Plan for HR Staff 20 Package manual for Approval 27 Print new coding manuals 28 Upgrade tables for CIMSIII - Applicabon System 21 Receive approval for manual and reorganization 22 Announcement to HR Staff 11 Bneling of HR Director Little Rock School District Human Resources Reorganization Tasks Listing % Complete Finish Assigned to: Notes: 100% 9/13/93 PCS team 0% 50% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 80% 80% 80% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9/20/93 9/21/93 9/24/93 9/27/93 9/28/93 9/29/93 9/30/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/1/93 10/4/93 10/5/93 10/6/93 Pagel Dato: 9/17/93 PCS team Choate/Mooney Choate/Mooney PCS Team PCS Team Gad berry Choate/Mooney Dr. Williams Choate Choate Choate Choate Project Leader PCS Team PCS Team HR Dir/Supenntendent Project LeaderID Task Description 23 Announcement to Distnct 15 Review and Revise Job Descriptions and Expectations 2 Reorganizabon Meetings w/ HR 3 Human Resources Training 24 Implement job desc. \u0026amp; expec. thru mtgs with HR staff 4 Announce Reorganizabon to Customers 7 Procedures for Pnnapals and Budget Managers 25 Transihon for HR Staff 26 Forms PrinUng 29 Print users manuals 33 Personnel Coordinators' problem log established 19 Develope Educabon Materials for Users 30 Disbibute new forms 31 Disbibute new coding manuals 32 Set up implementabon hot-hne 34 Modify baining and manuals based on problem logs 35 Conduct follow-on baining if necessary Little Rock School Disbict Human Resources Reorganizabon Tasks Listing % Complete Finish Assigned to: Notes: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10/8/93 10/8/93 10/11/93 10/12/93 10/14/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/15/93 10/25/93 10/25/93 10/25/93 11/5/93 11/15/93 11/22/93 Page 2 Date: 9/17/93 HR Dir/Superintendent PCS Team Human Resource Director Into Svcs Human Resource Director HR Dir/Supenntendent Choate Human Res. Dept. Project Leader Project Leader Human Resource Director Choate/Mooney Human Res. Human Res. Human Res. Dept. Dept. Dept. Human Resource Director Human Resource DirectorB5050101 05/10/1100 PROGRAM PLANNENG AND BUDGETING PROCESS WORKSHOPS WORKSHOPS EVALUATION SUMMARY NOTE\nThe following summary report is designed to assist the ODM staff, and the Court, in preparation for the June 8/9, 1995 LRSD budget hearing. 8/12/94. The final budget hearing on the LRSD FY94-95 budget was held on August 12,1994. During that hearing, the Court addressed some of the deficiencies in the LRSD planning and budgeting processes. At page 77-82 of the hearing transcript, the Judge directed the district to conduct some staff development on the budget process and to contact ODM concerning those workshops. Further, the Judge indicated that she would follow up with a written order to that effect. 8/26/94. Bill Mooney started preparing a design and material for an ODM training session on the Program Budget Document (PBD) and concepts for recommending LRSD workshops. 8/30/94. Ann Brown and Bill Mooney met to discuss initial ideas on the ODM training and what to recommend to LRSD for their workshops. 9/2/94. Bill Mooney conducted training on the PBD for the ODM staff. Lessons learned went into recommendations for LRSD workshops. 9/12/94. Russ Mayo, Robert Glowers, Ann Brown, and Bill Mooney met to discuss the LRSD plan for the workshops suggested by the Court. The meeting was a general discussion on what the district had already tentatively planned\nthe who, what, when, where, and why. Brown suggested the LRSD wait until the order comes out. Mayo and Glowers felt the district had to move quickly in order to meet their timelines. 9/13/94. Robert Glowers issued a memo outlining the workshop schedule. (Attachment A)9/19/94. Ann Brown sent a memo to Robert Glowers in response to his 9/13/94 memo. She informed him that his listing of workshop offerings, contrary to what he stated in his memo, was neither Court mandated nor Court approved. (Attachment A, notation) 9/19/94. Robert Glowers issued a memo reducing the time allotted for the Program Planning and Budget Process workshop and the Program Evaluation workshop in order to minimize the time principals were out of their buildings. 9/20/94. Robert Glowers asked Bill Mooney to attend the Program Planning and Budget Process workshop to help answer any questions. Bill Mooney agreed. 9/22/94. The LRSD conducted the Program Planning and Budget Process and the Program Evaluation workshops. 9/23/94. The LRSD conducted the Program Planning and Budget Process and the program Evaluation workshops (two sessions each). 10/5/94. The LRSD conducted the Program Budget Document workshop (two sessions). 10/6/94. The LRSD conducted the Program Budget Document workshop. 10/24/94. The Court issued the order relating to the staff development requirements. The Court required the LRSD to work with ODM to develop and conduct quality, continuous training on the program planning and budget process for all those who participate in that process. At a minimum, these training sessions were to address the operational responsibilities of the participants in each of the components of the process (needs assessment, program inventory, goals and objectives, program development, budgeting, monitoring and reporting, and evaluation). The LRSD was charged to work with ODM to ensure that the training was adequately defined and implemented. 11/21/94. Robert Glowers called Bill Mooney for a meeting on the Court order. 11/22/94. Russ Mayo, Robert Glowers, Ann Brown, and Bill Mooney met to discuss the training requirements of the Court order. There was a general discussion of what the LRSD had already planned. Brown and Mooney suggested using other staff members to help in the instruction, and mentioned a problem with time allotments. 11/23/94. Bill Mooney began preparing material and examples of good business cases to assist the LRSD in getting ready for the Business Case workshop. 11/28/94. Russ Mayo, Robert Glowers, Ann Brown, and Bill Mooney met on the Business Case workshop. The meeting mainly addressed the various options for the session format, the need for some policy guidelines on when to use a business case, and the time allocation problem. 11/29/94. Robert Glowers and Bill Mooney met to discuss the Business Case and Budget Process workshops. They reviewed the workshop outline, and discussed session format. Mooney reminded Clowers of the time problem. Mooney did not accept the invitation to be the instructor due to the time allotment problems. 11/29/94. Robert Clowers called Bill Mooney to inform him that Superintendent Williams had rejected the time allotment recommendations, and directed him to stay with the original allotments. 11/30/94. Bill Mooney discussed the time allotment problem with Superintendent Williams. Williams said he would stay with the schedule. 11/30/94. Robert Clowers informed Bill Mooney that Estelle Matthis would be the instructor for the Business Case workshop. There were only five work days before the first session. 12/1/94. Bill Mooney delivered a complete set of business case examples, organized into a training package, and supported by some overheads for the LRSD to use in the Business Case workshop. The cover memo discussed the enclosed material and the time allotment problem. 12/2/94. Robert Clowers sent a memo to Ann Brown with the agenda and timelines for the coming workshops. 12/5/94. Bill Mooney met with Estelle Matthis on the Business Case workshop. Matthis shared her plan for the session. Mooney discussed his ideas on subject matter and session format. Mooney shared his concerns with the time allotments. Mooney provided other assistance. 12/6/94. Bill Mooney met with Estelle Matthis prior to the Business Case workshop. Matthis shared her revisions for the session, and asked for final comments. Mooney reviewed the material and format, and provided suggestions. 12/6/94. The LRSD conducted the Business Case workshop and the Budget Process workshop (two sessions each). 12/8/94. The LRSD conducted the Business Case workshop and the Budget Process workshop. 12/19/94. Robert Clowers informed Bill Mooney that the LRSD would conduct follow-up training sessions on the Business Case and the Budget Process for those that missed the first sessions or wanted more information. Clowers said follow-up workshop would be on 12/20/94. 12/20/94. The LRSD conducted a follow-up workshop on the Business Case and the Budget Process.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Planning, Research and Evaluation Evaluation of the Seminar on PROGRAM EVALUATION FORMAT Please help us evaluate this seminar by responding to the items below. Circle the number which best express your reaction to each of the items. Space for additional comments has been provided. 1. The objectives of the seminar were: Clearly evident 5 4 3 2 1 Vague 2. The organization of the seminar was: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 3, How effective was the presenter(s): Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor 5. Was the presentation effective: Adequate 5 4 3 2 1 Inadequate 6. The information gained should prove: Beneficial 5 4 3 2 1 Not Beneficial 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor What additional information would have been advantageous to you: Comments:Workshop: Dates: The Program Planning and Budgeting Process 9/22/94, 9/23/94 (two sessions) Presenter: Russ Mayo Audience: All budget managers and principals Total evaluations returned: 19 Rating scale: excellent = 5, poor = 1 1. The objectives of the seminar were: (Clearly evident/vague) 4.32 2. The organization of the seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 3.84 3. How effective was the presenter(s): (Excellent/poor) 4.05 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: (Excellent/poor) 4.11 5. Was the presentation effective: (Adequate/inadequate) 4.16 6. The information gained should prove: (Beneficial/not beneficial) 4.42 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.00 Overall rating: 4.13 Evaluations with comments: 3 Comments follow: * Very concrete ! lots of specific examples - pleasant delivery! * If possible, future presentations of the planning process would take place earlier in the work year/annual cycle. * Overall redundant programs: 1. PBD, 2. Program Eval, 3. Annual Reports, 4. COE, 5. NCA, 6. State Department reports, 7. Periodic evaluation instruments.Workshop: The Program Evaluation Dates: 9/22/94, 9/23/94 (two sessions) Presenter: Robert Glowers, Selma Hobby Audience: All budget managers and principals Total evaluations returned: 45 Rating scale: excellent = 5, poor = 1 1. The objectives of the seminar were\n(Clearly evident/vague) 4.02 2. The organization of the seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 3.98 3. How effective was the presenter(s): (Excellent/poor) 4.00 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: (Excellent/poor) 3.98 5. Was the presentation effective: (Adequate/inadequate) 3.96 6. The information gained should prove: (Beneficial/not beneficial) 4.07 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.00 Overall rating: Evaluations with comments: 13 4.00 Comments follow: * Fantastic! Great job! * Like the concrete * Great! Im relieved and I welcome the challenge. * Thanks for your help. * Veiy good presentation. I was lost, but now Im found.* Dr. Hobby was very clear and to the point. I understand the expectations. * very helpful. The well defined and written sample and the step-by-step explanation of the process was * Additional information requested: why we have to do this, and what is in it for me\nQ\u0026amp;A example walk-through using overhead so all can participate. 1. Policy questions must be handled, and not avoided. How does this fit in with the other plans they are having to do? 2. Presenter attitude sometimes projects this is something you just have to do. Up The Down Staircase example. 3. Why are you not using the established evaluation criteria? This could lead to wasted effort. * Dr. Hobby was great. * More clarity is needed - each area has its own unique problems that could not be addressed in the whole group. Need a complete sample. I dont think the process has been thought through completely. * Sample and commentary should not be together. Please provide a clean sample, so that participants may see exactly what the final product is to look like. Thanks. * issues for me. I already was familiar with the process, but the presentation helped clarify a couple of * Additional information requested: Access to the overall process.Workshop: The Program Budget Document Dates: 10/5/94 (two sessions) Presenter: Robert Clowers Audience: All budget managers and principals Total evaluations returned: 33 Rating scale: excellent = 5, poor = 1 1. The objectives of the seminar were: (Clearly evident/vague) 3.88 2. The organization of the seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 3.79 3. How effective was the presenter(s): (Excellent/poor) 3.55 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: (Excellent/poor) 3.67 5. Was the presentation effective: (Adequate/inadequate) 3.76 6. The information gained should prove: (Beneficial/not beneficial) 3.85 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 3.58 Overall rating: Evaluations with comments: 11 3.72 Comments follow: * Additional information requested: To be able to use our own PBD plans at seminar. Have scheduled individual sessions about our PBD. Are talk to other program managers about their PBD. This seminar really helped in clearing up so of my misconfusion. * The evaluation criteria is not as clear as I would like it to be. How can we truly tell the evaluation is what the District want it to be. * Lets work in the lab for hands on activities. When you are opening and closing please consider the PET model to make your presentation better. * Wasted time talking about Plant Services problems. * Effective, but would have been more helpful if it had been done two weeks earlier to avoid 3 or 4 reports being due OCT 14 - But the effort is very much appreciated - Wish we had in service for each report for us new folks. * It would be nice if you could bring a PC to the next seminar.  Point out differences between normal schools and incentive schools and not directions are different (No PROGBUD1.DOC). Provide dates for all upcoming quarters. * Thanks. * The presentation was helpful. * This workshop was a bit elementary. It should have been voluntary. Most of the principals are done with the document of this quarter. * Not needed by principals who have been doing it right for one year.Workshop: The Business Cases Dates: 12/6/94 (two sessions), 12/8/94 Presenter: Vic Anderson, Estelle Matthis Audience: All budget managers and principals Total evaluations returned: 38 Rating scale: excellent = 5, poor = 1 1. The objectives of the seminar were: (Clearly evident/vague) 4.76 2. The organization of the seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.66 3. How effective was the presenter(s): (Excellent/poor) 4.68 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: (Excellent/poor) 4.74 5. Was the presentation effective: (Adequate/inadequate) 4.63 6. The information gained should prove: (Beneficial/not beneficial) 4.58 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.58 Overall rating: Evaluations with comments: 30 4.66 Comments follow: * Not enough time for the activities. * Lack of time was a major factor. Did not allow for enough work...A consultant will be needed to....the business case will be accepted. * For next year - more time to study samples - with January 13 deadline, no need for more work this year. * Page numbers on the handouts.* A sample of one, comprehensive approved business case. One of the best LRSD in services in which Ive participated. Quite informative and familiarizing about the budgeting process - inclusive of the business case. Thanks! * We should practice. * How will this business case effect area schools with limited budgets? Do we write cases for current programs for possible more funding to better service students? Please have these seminars on school time. It is inhumane to expect effective participation when most of us have been up since 5:00 am. * At the time inservice is to begin, close door  let late arrivers go to make-up session. * Mrs Matthis has a reputation for beginning meetings on time. I was disappointed that those of us who were on time had to wait almost 30 minutes for all participants to arrive. In the case of mandatory meetings, participants should not have been allowed to enter after a certain time - they should have to come back to another meeting. * More time to go through the actual process, but I know we were given the opportunity to get more. It was good. * Very good! * I needed more think time to reflect and digest info. * I would like to read one business case that was successful from start to finish. More time to understand presentation. * Getting out after 6 PM was not acceptable. I have 3-4 hours of LRSD work to do this evening in preparation for a workshop tomorrow. The meeting should have stated on time. * The time allotted did not allow for actually developing a business case, but analysis of the parts (examples) was helpful. Perhaps another workshop for those who desire it. * Presentation was interesting and well articulated. Wished we had more time. * Good job! More time for work sessions. * Not enough time to write business case or program evaluations. * The hands-on approach was very effective. The information given was very thorough 10and presented very well. Very helpful!! * Good presentation but needed more time to do sample cases in group. Too much noise for those of us that need quiet when reading.  More time to analyze business cases would help! * An example of a business case that is considered to be perfect. Not enough time. * Good job! * You did a super job. * Need more time on subject. * Need follow-up! Also someone to contact about questions about the business plan. Someone to review and give me feed back about my plan before turning it in on January 13, 1995. * Mrs. Matthis did an excellent job. * Good handouts, helpful visuals - very nice job. Clear and articulate presenters. * How about a complete business case which exemplifies the best in each of the 10 elements? A good model is the best teacher! ITWorkshop: The Financial and Manpower Reports Dates: 12/6/94 (two sessions), 12/8/94 Presenter: Brady Gadberry, Mark Milhollen Audience: All budget managers and principals Total evaluations returned: 63 Rating scale: excellent = 5, poor = 1 1. The objectives of the seminar were: (Clearly evident/vague) 4.38 2. The organization of the seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.43 3. How effective was the presenter(s): (Excellent/poor) 4.38 4. Did the presenter(s) communicate effectively: (Excellent/poor) 4.44 5. Was the presentation effective: (Adequate/inadequate) 4.29 6. The information gained should prove: (Beneficial/not beneficial) 4.51 7. Overall, I thought this seminar was: (Excellent/poor) 4.32 Overall rating: Evaluations with comments: 34 4.39 Comments follow: * More time to understand presentation. * Work with individual principals that are new to the district or with district procedures. More time for elaboration and questions would have helped me. I would have been more alert and able to digest all the info had it been presented earlier in the day. 12* I think that more time should be given to principal to help them understand the process. Its critical that all of us know how the process works. * This was totally inadequate for the new principals (no offense intended to Brady). We need a walk-through workshop by an expert to prepare these forms properly. * Small groups which include like schools. Mark should have been here\nlet this part be done later. Brady did his best. * Very helpful in that I knew nothing before or about these topics. * It was no fault of the presenter that the time was too short. He was also standing in for another which led to a bit of disorganization. * Too rushed! * Need more time.  Needed a little more time to ask questions. * Time allocation was too short and intended presenter was absent. * My manpower report has been corrected in the same place at least 3 times. Could some please fix it this time - a big red note will be sent. * Need more time. * Short and sweet. * Need more time on subject. * I would like one a little more in depth for first year principals. * Good, short to the point. * Excellent, clear and helpful. Too tired at end of the day. Mark, you are always thorough. Thanks! * Good job, Mark! I understand most of the information\nhowever, I will probably need help with it. 13* Not clear at all. * More time! * Very effective presentation. * Well done. * We need a work session on the budget addition, deletion and allocation. * Very good. * Magnet schools at a disadvantage without materials to track. * Mark is always clear, to the point and very well prepared - appreciate packet again this year very much. * Thank you for the Budget Instruction booklet - Im very pleased with it! * Presenter was rushed due to time limitation. * Financial staff not present/available for presentation. Budget staff needs to be available with more time spent on this process. * Well organized and concise. 14USD PUNNINC AND BUDGETING PROCESS A Organization and Staffing X J B PrograM Coordination a Broad-l\u0026gt;ased Input and Participation Needs Assessnent  Progran Inventorg D Goals and Olbjectives  E Progran Deuelopnent t-  r Budgeting \u0026gt;G   Program Budget Bccunent H Honitoriny and Reporting  I  Progran Evaluation \u0026gt; L Restart cycleCORR44 REVISED 3/4/94 MOONEY NOTES ON THE ROBERT BROWN SITUATION THE \"REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE\" MEMO - I could not tell what he wants other than \"equity\". He did not ask for anything specific. He may have just wanted to blow. -1 could not tell what he was really getting at with the money situation, nor could I tell what the situation really was. It will take some research and a talk with Mark to figure out what the facts really are in this case. -1 dont think ODM action would be appropriate particularly since we dont have any of the facts about the situation. THE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT - He had 25 statements not included in the PBD. I concur with not including 24, and found several more that were included which I would have rejected. - I would have included 1 of the statements. - He said 17 pages were excluded. The 25 statements just happened to be on 17 separate pages. There were not 17 pages of statements excluded. - The statements which were not included were poorly written in that they were not statements of achievement. Some were statements of future actions, some were requests for support, some were negative comments on the administration. The statements reflect a very negative view of the administration. - He had 24 achievement statements included. This does put him far behind Rightsell, Stephens, and Rockefeller. These 24 achievements covered only 9 of the possible 30 programs (30%). The result is that Garland does not look like they are doing very well. -1 dont think ODM action is warranted on this issue. The District should train the principals to write good achievements, and the principals should bring good works to the writing session. - I have prepared the attached sheet analyzing the Incentive School section of the latest PBD. Quality and appropriateness was not considered\nonly effort.ODM ACTION -1 recommend a letter to Robert Brown covering these points\n* * ODM does not have all the information on either of these issues Both the money and the achievements are operational issues, the purview of the administration * We recommend he work within the channels of the District to get his grievances redressed. * We recommend he request a training session for the Incentive School principals on the PBD and writing achievements. * We recommend he develop his material in a positive tone to sell the ideas to the administration.QUICK ANALYSIS OF INCENTIVE SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT STATEMENTS The following analysis of achievement statements is based on the material in the second quarter 1994 Program Budget Document. Quality and appropriateness was not considered. The count is only based on a response being made. RIGHT STEPH MITCH ROCKE FRANK GARLA 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 4 0 0 1 8 0 0 7 0 3 4 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 6 0 2 4 3 0 2 0 4 5 0 4 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 3 0 1 1 8 0 2 6 4 5 1 0 33 10 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 1 7 2 0 0 0 3 6 0 8 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (2) (2) (1) (3) (3) (2) (1) (4) TOT 59 66 6 92 23 24 25 PG 14 20 4 21 12 9FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK HERSCHEL H. FRIDAY, P.A. ROBERT V. LIGHT, P.A. WILLIAM H. SUTTON. P.A. JAMES W. MOORE BYRON M. EISEMAN, JR.. P.A. JOE 0. BELL, P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS, P.A. JAMES A. BUTTRY. P.A. FREDERICK S. URSERY, P.A. H.T. LARZELERE, P.A. OSCAR E. DAVIS, JR.. P.A. JAMES C. CLARK, JR.. P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON, P.A. PAUL B. BENHAM HI, P.A. LARRY W. BURKS, P.A. A. WYCKLIFF NISBET. JR., P.A. JAMES EDWARD HARRIS. P.A. J. PHILLIP MALCOM, P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON, P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT. P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON, P.A. J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL III. P.A. DONALD H. BACON. P.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A. WALTER A. PAULSON II, P.A. BARRY E. COPLIN, P.A. RICHARD D. TAYLOR. P.A. JOSEPH B. HURST. JR.. P.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN, P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER. P.A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH. P.A. ROBERT S. SHAFER. P.A. WII LIAM M. GRIFFIN HI. P.A THOMAS N . ROSE. P.A. MICHAEL S. MOORE. P.A. DIANE S. MACKEY. P.A. WALTER M. EBEL HI. P.A. A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 601-376-201 1 FAX NO. 601-376-2147 August 5, 1994 AUG 8 1994 KEVIN A. CRASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WADDELL, JR., P.A. CLYDE 'TAB* TURNER. P.A. CALVIN J. HALL. P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER, P.A. JERRY L. MALONE, P.A. M. GAYLE CORLEY. P.A. ROBERT B. BEACH, JR., P.A. J. LEE BROWN, P.A. JAMES C. BAKER. JR.. P.A. H. CHARLES GSCHWEND. JR., P.A. HARRY A. LIGHT, P.A. SCOTT H. TUCKER. P.A. JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH. P.A. GUY ALTON WADE, P.A. PRICE C. GARDNER J. MICHAEL PICKENS TONIA P. JONES DAVID D. WILSON JEFFREY H. MOORE ANDREW T. TURNER JOHN RAY WHITE DAVID M. GRAF CARLA G. SPAINHOUR JOHN C. FENOLEY, JR. ALLISON GRAVES BAZZEL JONANN C. ROOSEVELT R. CHRISTOPHER LAWSON GREGORY D. TAYLOR TONY L. WILCOX FRAN C. HICKMAN BETTY J. DEMORY Fax 371-0100 Office of Desegfegauon .. COKNSEI. WILLIAM J. SMITH WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE. JR., P.A. 8.S. CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY WILLIAM L. PATTON. JR.. P.A. WRITER'S DIRECT NO. (601} 370-1606 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: ODM Observations on the LRSD Budgeting Documents and Process Dear Ann: 1994 Mark Milhollen has shared with me a document dated July 28, which is titled \"Office of Desegregation Monitoring Observations on the LRSD Budgeting Documents and Process\". paragraph eight of that document, you say that \"LRSD contemptuously failed to comply with Court-ordered timelines.- am writing to express my disagreement with that statement. In has The first issue is a relatively minor one. You say that the district has known about the summer hearing schedule since May, 1994. That statement is true but incomplete. The May 9, 1994 order scheduled the June and July hearings, but said that \"Orders detailing the information the Court will review at the June and July hearings will follow at a later date\". The order which detailed the information LRSD would be required to submit by noon on July 18, 1994 was filed on July 6, 1994. The more important issue concerns your statement that our decision not to seek an extension of time was \"a major failure of execution\" and \"contemptuous.\" Nothing about LRSD's failure to move for an extension of time was contemptuous. failure of execution. There was no We simply made a judgment that we could file a document in a timely manner which would substantially comply with the court's order. We also believed that the process of ODM'sreview and the court's review of the LRSD budget would be better served by filing a document on July 18 than by seeking an extension of time. NLRSD and PCSSD also apparently made the judgment to submit to the court the most current information available rather than to seek an extension of time. NLRSD Superintendent James Smith described the document submitted by NLRSD as follows: This is a preliminary projection of our budget for this year. It's not the final document that will be presented to our Board in August for final approval. We began on this several months ago trying to project what the state revenues would be, local revenues and come with the best guess that we could at this time to present to the Court. Transcript of June 28, 1994 hearing, p. 10. PCSSD submitted a document described by its Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs as \"an updated version of the tentative 1994-95 budget\". PCSSD noted \"that actual expenditures for the 1993-94 school year are still very tentative and some revenue changes may still occur\". PCSSD also described several unresolved issues which could \"significantly impact\" the budget numbers provided to the court. Finally, PCSSD observed that \"[s]ignificant changes could still be necessary in both revenue and expenses.\" There has been no effort in any district to contemptuously refuse to provide information to the court or to delay in providing information to the court. information available to All of the districts provided the best them at the time of the deadline established by the court. I thought it was apparent to everyone that the budget documents would continue to evolve after the July 18 deadline and that each of the districts could provide more complete and accurate information at a later date. I did not consider this to be sufficient reason to seek to delay the July 18 filing, particularly since a hearing on the budgets was to be held ten days after that deadline. In any event, there was nothing contemptuous about our decision to provide information to the court on July 18 rather than seek an extension of time. Yours v^y ul CJH/k cc: Dr. Henry P. Williams LRSD Board of Directors iristopher Heller1 Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM To: Krom: Through: Date: Subject: All PrDfrtiin Miiiuif^rs Roberl Glowers, Director of^Planning, Research, \u0026amp; Evaluation 'ten dent September 13, 1994 Planning Process Workshops During the 1993-94 school year, we implemented a new planning process. This year we are refining that process while ensuring that all of us are clear about its intent. Recently, Judge Wright issued an order for us to present workshops to all program managers involved in the process. Below is a listing of workshops with dates, times, places, and the intended audience. Please place the workshops on your schedules. All will be presented al the district office in the board room. The importance of these workshops cannot be overemphasized. Thanks for your cooperation. J Date Time Audience Topic 9/22/94 1:0(\u0026gt;pin - 4:()()pin Program Managers (not principals) The Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process Tlic Program Evaluation 9/23/94 9:()()ani - I2:0()pni Secondary- principals The Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process The Program Evaluation kot'pni - 4:0()pm Elemcnlar} principals The Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process Tlte Program Evaluation 10/5/94 l:()Opni - 2:30pni Program Managers (not principals) The Program Budget Document 10/6/94 12/6/94 3:00pm - 4\n30pm 4:()0pm - 5:30pm 1:00pm - 3:00pm Elementary principals Secondary principals Program Managers (not principals) The Program Budget Document The Program Budget Document Business Cases Financial and Manpo\\5 er Reports 4:00pm - 6:00pm Secondary principals Business Cases Financial and Manpow er Reports 12/8/94 3:00pm - 5:00pm Elementary principals Business Cases Financial and Manpower Reports C: ) Superintendents Council Chris Heller, LRSD Attorney Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney Ann Brown, MonitorPROGRAM PLANNING BUDGET PROCESS WORKSHOPS December 20, 1994 Little Rock School District Follow-Up Workshop AGENDA Welcome Dr. Robert Clowers Session Schedules I. BUSINESS CASES Objectives Timeline on Business Cases Guidelines - When a Business Case is Required \"Whats In It For Me\" Mrs. Estelle Matthis Purpose of A Business Case History of the Business Case and Why Development of the Business Case  The 10 Elements Questions and Answers Evaluations BREAK II. BUDGET PROCESS Objectives Mark Milhollen Financial Manpower Reports Questions and Answers EvaluationsOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 19, 1994 Dr. Robert Glowers Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, .AR 72201 Hand Delivered Dear Robert: When I returned to my office after 5:00 p.m. on Friday (after having spent another long day in Judge Wright's courtroom), I found that the day's mail had brought a copy of a September 13, 1994 memo from you to \".All Program Managers.\" Thank you for sending me this information. Unfortunately, the memo contains a sentence that is incorrect: \"Recently, Judge Wright issued an order for us to present workshops to all program managers involved in the process.\" During recent conversations between you and me and Russ Mayo as well I've repeatedly stressed that Judge Wright has QQl yet issued such an order, but I've told you that she has said she will soon write one containing detailed information. Your statement in the memo is not only inaccurate, it also implies that your listing of offerings is both court-mandated and court-approved. Not so. In our conversations about this topic. I've emphasized that, while you may go ahead with your own workshops, you must do so realizing that the forthcoming court order may include specific requirements that you are not addressing with your current training. For example, as I told you when we discussed the request you've sent to principals about evaluation, I don't believe that you're going to get very meaningful or useful results from the process as it's currently set up. What I think you're going to get back is the model example (regurgitated verbatim) embellished with the PBD in narrative form. The real results? (1) Unhappy principals complaining about being overburdened with paperwork and duplicate efforts\n(2) no meaningful measurement that reveals how far people have gotten toward the goal in terms of meeting objectives\n(3) no solid indicators of what worked, what didn't, what needs to be changed, and how to change it. Robert. I do believe you intend to do right. I also know that you have lots of people telling you what to do, that you don't get to make all the decisions, and that you have timelines and deadlines to meet. I understand what it's like to be in that position, because I'm frequently there. But even under those circumstances. I've always found that I can control what I put in my own memos. I've also found that it's best to strive for scrupulous accuracy-and to be especially careful about any implications regarding the Court. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Browns I 09/20/94 14:56 QoOl 324 2032 I. R School Dlst 002 Little Rock School District Planning, Research, and Evaluation \\ I I MEMORANDUM cX \u0026gt; TO\nAll Principals From: Dr. Robert Glowers, Director Through: Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Subject\nTime Changes in Planning Process Workshops A memorandum of September 13, 1994, outlined a series of workshops that will be presented for the Districts Program Managers. The dates remain the same. However, the times for the September 23,1994, meetings have been rescheduled in order to minimize the time principals are out of their respective building due to the Parent Conference Day. Please make the following changes to your calendar: All secondary principals along with Margaret Gremillions cluster group of elementary principals will meet beginning promptly at 7:30 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. in the board room. The other cluster group of elementary principals will meet from 10:00 a.m. until 12:00 noon in the board room. The topics. The Planning and Budgeting Process and The Program Evaluation remain the same. As expressed in the previous memorandum, the importance of these workshops cannot be overemphasized. Thank you for your cooperation. prog_cv2.doc I J-t  09/20/94 14:57 501 324 2032 L R School Dlst 0003 I, 7 I Lillie Rock School Di.strici MEMORANDUM 'ft' .yQf To: Eroni\nThrough: Date\nSubject: .4// Pro^nun Mttna^rs R-O^^rt Clowers, Director ofrianning. Research, \u0026amp; Evaluation D41)S^4Xj^illi\u0026amp; Itendent September 13, 1994 Planning Process Workshops iie During the 1993-94 school year, we implemented a new planning process. This year we are refining that process while ensuring that all of us are clear about its intent. Recently, Judt-e Wright issued an order for us to present workshops to all program managers involved in the process. Below is a listing or workshops with dates, times, places, and the intended audience. Please place the workshops on your schedules. All will be presented al the district office in the board room. The importance of these workshops cannot be overemphasized. Thanks for your cooperation. i 7'inie Audience Topic 9l}2m IrOOptn - 4:0()pm Program Managers (not principals) 9/23/94 9:00am - 12:00pm Secondan.' principals The Planning \u0026amp;. Budgeting Process The Program Eval nation The Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process Tlie Program Ei'aluation r 1 l:00pra - 4:00pm Elemcntar}' principals Tlie Planning \u0026amp; Budgeting Process Tlie Program Evaluailon 10/5/94 1:00pm - 2\n30pm Program Managers (not principals) The Program Budget Document 10/6/94 12/6/94 12/8/94 3:00pm - 4\n30pm 4:00pra - 5:30pm T.OOpm - 3:00pm 4:00pm - 6:00pm 3:00pm - 5:(Xlpm Elemcniar)- principals Secondarj' principals Program Managers (not principals) Secondan principals Elementar}' principals The Program Budget Document The Program Budget Document Business Cases Financial and Manpower Reports Business Cases Financial and Manpower Reports Business Cases Financial and Manpower Reports C: ) Superintendents Council Chris Heller, LRSD Attorney Jerry Malone. LRSD Attorney Ann Brown, .Monitoru o\n.a: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OCT 2 4 CE? C\nRK LITTLE ROCX SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS ' KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ORDER A hearing held on August 12, 1994 culminated a series of Court dates, which had begun in February 1994, Little Rock School District (LRSD) budget. to consider the 1994-95 In an August 22, 1994 Order, the Court stopped short of affirmatively approving the 1994-95 LRSD budget, but did not block its implementation. The Court now- addresses in more detail the deficiencies in the LRSD budgeting processes. The LRSD made some improvements in its final budget document over the course of the budget hearings. The district succeeded in producing a final document that is much more readable and concise than previous versions. In the final budget, items are easier to find, understand, and correlate. Also, during 1993-94, as it planned for the coming fiscal year, the LRSD worked through the steps of the planning and budgeting process which it had developed in conjunction with the Court-appointed Budget Specialist. In generating the 1994- 95 budget, the district addressed all of the components of thatprocess to some degree. However, the LRSD did not always follow its plan and needs to improve timeliness, and overall quality of its work. accuracy, comprehensiveness, I. Projected Budget Deficits The Court continues to be particularly concerned about the increasingly large and ominous budget deficits that the LRSD projects for future years. These shortfalls are due in part to recurring expenses being funded through non-recurring revenue sources, as well as to the apparent trend of overall expenditures growing faster than revenues. As with the FY 1993-94 budget, the LRSD created a balanced 1994-95 budget by using extraordinary one-time budget-balancing strategies that do not represent lasting fiscal reductions\nfor example. saving $908,776 through the Early Retirement Incentive Program\nborrowing $1.6 million in settlement loans\nusing a $4.1 million carryover balance\na spending freeze in the amount of $400,000\na cut of $300,000 in the line item for substitutes (with no explanation of how that amount was determined or the potential impact of the cut). The specter of a financial crisis looms ever larger over the LRSD, threatening to jeopardize the district's ability to carry out its obligations to provide a high-quality, desegregated education in the years to come. Yet the district continues to procrastinate in facing the tough decisions that it must make in order to align its spending patterns with the hard realities of declining revenues. For example, positions in the administrative ranks continue to be added, schools are under-enrolled, and salary increases appear automatic. -2-II. The Program Planning and Budgeting Process The district has developed, with the assistance of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a program planning and budgeting process that can serve the LRSD well if the district exercises the required management discipline. The program planning and budgeting procedures are tools that must work for the LRSD. The process is not static, but ongoing and cyclical\nit must be constantly managed and continuously improved so that it meets the district's changing needs and resources. The Court has repeatedly stressed that the LRSD must delineate the links between budgeting, planning. and evaluation which will ensure that the district spends money wisely and meets its desegregation obligations. Yet the district made little effort during the 1993-94 fiscal year to complete meaningful program evaluations operations. for budget decisions or modifications in programs or At the end of the 1993-94 program development cycle. recommendations to modify or delete inefficient or ineffective programs were virtually non-existent. The district must improve the quality and timeliness of the products that should result from the planning and budgeting processes. Needs assessment, program evaluations, decisions to add. modify, or delete programs, and the budget itself all suffered from problems relating to timeliness and quality. Decision-making must be built on defined processes that are based on data and analysis and correlated into a management time-frame. Rather than using business cases as rationales to justify changes already made by -3-\"administrative prerogative,\" the district should use its businesscase process as a decision-making tool to define problems, identify alternatives. anticipate consequences. and then confidently make well-reasoned choices. As examples of deficiencies that can be generally categorized as quality-related, the FTE's (Full Time Equivalence, which indicate specific numbers of employees) had been omitted from the budget (but were restored at the direction of the Court)\nof 37 proposed business cases, 33 involved additions and modifications that added costs to. the budget\nthe district had formulated no contingency plan in the event the transportation \"outsourcing\" option being investigated by the LRSD did not materialize (as it subsequently did not)\nproposed school closings at Baseline and Stephens did not relate to a comprehensive long-term facilities plan\nseveral of the business cases lacked substantive information and others contained information that was disjointed and fragmentary, incongruous. or inadequately explained and supported. thus leaving many questions unanswered. especially these having to do with the relationship between evaluation and planned changes. Program decisions must be made within a time-frame which will allow orderly input into the budget process. Decisions delayed early in the cycle compress decision-making into slim time-frames. resulting in last minute decisions that leave little time for proper incorporation into the budget document. Examples of tardiness include: the needs assessment was two months overdue and published so late that its usefulness was severely limited\ndecisions on -4-transportation outsourcing were two months late and delayed until the very last moment\nprogram development decisions were still being considered five months after they were scheduled for completion\nthe district has yet to develop a plan for paying back the settlement loans\nfilings due on July 18, 1994 for hearings scheduled for July 28 and 29, 1994 were lata, forcing a continuation until August 12, 1994. The district must work to institutionalize the planning and budgeting process throughout all levels of the organization. The- process must become a well-understood, standard operating procedure that is well-accepted and consistently practiced as a way of life in the LRSD. The process can be institutionalized only if participants all levels are actively involved in all aspects on a day-to-day basis. The distric must ensure that those who are responsible for managing programs and budgets have a working knowledge of the process and are completely involved in it throughout the year. To this end, the Court requires the LRSD to work with ODM to: 1. Develop and conduc quality, continuous training on the program planning and budget participate in that process. process for all those who At a minimum, these training sessions should address the operational responsibilities of the participants in each of the components of the process (needs assessment, program inventory, goals and objectives. program development. budgeting. monitoring and reporting. and evaluation). The LRSD will work with ODM to ensure that the training is adequately defined and implemented. -5-2. Institute management processes which will actively review progress, in terms of achievements and expenditures, on a regular basis, involving every level of the organization down to at least every budget manager. The LRSD will work with ODM to ensure that the management processes are adequately defined and implemented. III. Business Cases The LRSD presented a number of business cases in conjunction. with its 1994-95 budget. some of which the district subsequently withdrew or ultimately did not fund. Although the Court will not comment here on each one of the business cases. it specifically addresses below those for which the Court requires additional information or orders the district to take specific action. The parties are reminded that, until such time that the Court approves changes (whether proposed through business cases or other means) that constitute any alteration in desegregation plan 007111711 -t-mpn-t-q, the parties are obligated to abide by the desegregation plan and relevant courr orders. a) Incentive School Spanish Program The district submitted several business cases regarding the Spanish language program in the incentive schools. The desegregation plan identifies foreign language as featured subject area of a emphasis in the incentive schools. The plan strongly recommends thaf: Spanish be the studied language, and calls for a number of specific activities and supports, including language labs, a total physical response methodology, and provisions for practical experiences and -6-interactions with a native language user. In addressing earlier proposals from the LRSD to modify or eliminate certain incentive school features, such as language labs, the Court issued a May 1, 1992 Order noting that the parties had agreed to a wide array of activities, enhanced programs, and support mechanisms that would be available at the incentive schools. The Order admonished the LRSD that the \"Eighth Circuit has emphasized the importance of the incentive schools and this Court will not allow the district to diminish the scope and quality of the schools' instructional programs and enrichment activities.\" A December 1993 report from ODM observed that the Spanish program in the incentive schools is \"in a deplorable state. The district still has failed to implement the foreign language program described in the incentive school section of the desegregation plan.\" (pg. 50) Subsequently, in submissions dated April 15, 1994, the LRSD filed individual business cases regarding Spanish instruction in each of the incentive schools. Most of the business cases requested either a half-time or full-time Spanish teacher. One proposed to pilot a Spanish immersion program at an unnamed incentive school. Later, in a July 18, 1994 submission, the district proposed a pilot program at one school that would cost $149,000. In this scenario. the remaining incentive schools would not offer Spanish during the regular instructional day. but would instead focus on infused cultural activities through the revised curriculum and thematic units. However, the district ultimately did not fund these business cases, but instead chose to allot new resources for foreign language -7-instruction at only- one incentive school, Franklin, where the proposal was for a pilot Spanish immersion program in one first-grade class. Since the district has submitted and subsequently withdrawn or simply not funded so many proposals regarding Spanish instruction, it is unclear to the Court how the district plans to deliver a quality foreign language program as outlined in the desegregation plan. Therefore, the district must submit on or before Wednesday, November 16, 1994, a concise but complete description of the Spanish program as it is being offered at each of the incentive schools. The description is to include the extent to which the program is offered during the regular instructional day or extended day\nthe date the program began in each school during this academic year\nthe days and times Spanish is offered at each school\nhow instruction is beino delivered\nthe number of FTE's teaching the subject in each school\nwhether each teacher is certified in Spanish\na description of each language lab and how it is being used to reinforce instruction\nthe grade levels at which Spanish is offered\nthe number of children enrolled in Spanish classes at each school by grade level\nthe specific learning objectives of the program, and how those objectives correlate to the program as it is being offered in each school (for example, as related to the methodology, instructional time, language lab practice periods, interaction with native speakers, etc.) b) Incentive School Theme Implementation On April 15, 1994, the LRSD submitted five separate business cases that requested funding to implement various \"phases\" of themes -8-in each incentive school. However, the district ultimately funded none of these proposals in its final 1994-95 budget. The 1994-95 school year is well underway, and the Court fears that the district may not be providing students the full range of programs promised in the desegregation plan. Even though this Court's May 1, 1992 Order instructed the LRSD to fully implement themes in the incentive schools, the district has consistently dragged its feet. For example, the December 1993 ODM report on the incentive schools points out that \"the earliest official starting date for a specialist was Februarv 17, 1993 at Rockefeller. Program specialists at Franklin, Mitchell, and Rightsell started as late as April 12, 1993, almost one full year after the [May 1992] court order.\" The report goes on to state that the specialists had been working to integrate each theme into the school's curriculum. Now, over two years after the May 1992 Order and over one year since full-time specialists began' working. it appears that the schools are requesting funding for implementation. What has happened in the interim is unclear. So that the Court may determine the extent to which the district is currently complying with previous orders to fully implement themes, the district is to submit on or before Wednesday, November 16, 1994, a description of theme implementation in each of the incentive schools that includes at least the following information: 1) a summary of the theme, how it is being integrated into the curriculum and school activities, and the implementation timeline school and 2) if theme implementation is contemplated in phases. the -9-rationale for such a method and plans for seeking Court approval for that approach activities, events, 3) a summary of the special programs, activities, events, equipment, and materials which are devoted to theme support at each school explanation for 4) the extent to which the theme is fully implemented at each school and an explanation for any delays in implementation 5) what remains to be done to implement the theme fully 6) the amount of money spent on each school's theme implementation during FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94 and the amount budgeted for FY 1994-95, by line item category, if possible (e.g., personnel, equipment, etc.) c) Staff Attorney In a June 1994 business case, the district proposed to add a full-time staff attorney position to the LRSD administration. The proposal states that the costs of adding this position would be offset by the savings in outside legal fees. Despite this assertion. the business case includes no dollar amounts for savings\nit only covers the costs of the new position and additional clerical support, a figure of some $94,000. Without a cost savings analysis, it is not possible for either the district or the Court to determine what the real savings may be. The budget figures for 1994-95 reflect no savings in the line item for legal expenses over the previous budget- The Court advises the LRSD to determine what portion of outside legal fees a staff attorney can realistically save the district before it moves to add another position to an already swollen administrative body. -10-b^bbs d) Director of Student Assignment and Desegregation The district has proposed to change the Desegregation Facilitator's title and duties to encompass direct responsibility for all aspects of the Student Assignment Office, coordination of citizen monitoring groups, and other duties. During the hearings, the attorney for Joshua expressed objections to the change, maintaining that the LRSD had afforded him neither adequate notice nor involvement. He also cited the proposal as a modification of the desegregation plan. which requires adherence to a modification process that had not been followed in this instance. The Court. concurred and also noted that, while the superintendent was free to organize his staff according to his professional judgment. any recasting of roles had to be consistent with the desegregation plans or else approved through the requisite plan modification process. The Court cautioned that any staff reorganization or changes in job descriptions could not result in neglect of plan-mandated responsibilities. Furthermore, the Court raised the issue of accountability, because the business case does not make clear exactly who would perform the jobs formerly assigned to the Desegregation Facilitator. The Court has charged the Monitor with coordinating among the parties the plan modification process for this proposed change. She will work with the LRSD to identify any deficiencies in the business case and to address them in ways that preserve the intent of the desegregation plan when it provided that a Desegregation Facilitator would serve the staff and students of LRSD schools. -11-e) Great Expectations Program On August 8, 1994, the district filed a business case proposing to implement Great Expectations, a program concept and methodology developed by an educator in Chicago and implemented in that city and elsewhere. The case does not adequately reflect that the district used the business-case method as a planning tool to enable it to make a confident, fully informed decision in adopting Great Expectations. For example, the case does not reflect the extent to which the district researched other programs, the criteria the district used to choose this one, or what the district expects the program to achieve.- The case does not state why Mitchell and Rightsell were selected as participating schools or how this program would mesh with the district's desegregation obligations. In depicting Great Expectations, the business case describes the types of learning activities that are already operationalor should bein the incentive schools according to the desegregation plan\nfor examnle. cooperative learning. the new LRSD integrated curriculum. the classics literature program, the Latin Enrichment Program, reading and oral expression across the cut-ti n:i im heterogeneous groups. Writing-to-Read, positive expectations, positive self-esteem, and the Effective Schools model. While the Court does not disapprove Great Expectations, it does not accept it as a replacement of the incentive school programs which are catalogued in the desegregation plan. Rather, the Court sees the program as complementary and hopes that the Great Expectations approach will be useful in coordinating and supporting delivery of -12-the many programs and activities that incentive school children should regularly be experiencing. The Court notes that the district has provided no information indicating that Great Expectations should in any way affect the funding level or double funding feature of the incentive schools. (f) Incentive School Double Funding An August 8, 1994 business case proposed to save over $312,000 in the incentive schools by reducing certain personnel and services. ODM monitoring reports on the incentive schools have documented. that the LRSD is more than double funding the incentive schools. The amount of money spent per pupil in the schools is a function of personnel and program costs in relation to the number of students enrolled in a particular building. Incentive school overhead costs remain relatively fixed from year to year, so if enrollment drops. per-pupil costs rise. Incentive school expenses have been increasing beyond the double funding point primarily due to under-enrollment and to increased personnel costs, noticeably due to the total amount of stipends paid t staff for the extended day and week programs. The district must curtail expenses wherever possible and appropriate\nbut at the same time, the district also must provide adequate compensatory, remedial. and enriched education to its students. The challenge which the double funding business case attempts to address is aligning incentive school costs with the programs and services promised in the desegregation plan. The only alignment method the district has contemplated in this proposal is cutting funding in various line items\nthe case does not consider -13-savings by increasing the number of students in each school through diligent recruitment, by releasing reserved seating, or by returning to their attendance zone those children who attend schools located outside their home zone. (Since the August hearing, the district has sought and received approval to release seats previously reserved for white children in the four-year-old and kindergarten programs.) While the Court does not block implementation of these cuts, this business case is a further example of an instance where the quality of the district's proposals need to be greatly improved. For example, a key element absent in this proposal is evaluation. The LRSD does not offer an evaluation base upon which to construct a solid case for changing elements of school programs or operations as they relate to funding. Decisions must not be solely money-driven\nthey must be based on monitoring, measurement. outcomes, evaluation. research, and reassessment as well as on economy. Otherwise, how can the district determine what needs to be changed and how to change it? The business case fails to draw clearly the connections between the decisions that drove specific cuts. which cuts relate to which program or activity, how the cuts will potentially affect programs. what proportion of a category (such as supplies) a specific line item cut represents, and how the LRSD will monitor and measure the effect of the changes. Furthermore, the case neglects to factor in the critical relationship between the number of students and per-pupil expenditure\nnor does the proposal state the enrollment level upon which the cuts were based. (When Stephens Incentive School closed at the end of 1993-94, significant number of its students were a -14-assigned to Garland Incentive School. The business case does not state whether such enrollment shifts were considered.) The Court will be watching the effects which these cuts have on the incentive schools. g) Academic Progress Incentive Grants On July 18, 1994, the LRSD submitted a number of business cases which included one on Academic Progress Incentive Grants (APIG) . That business case is subtitled \"Proposed Modification of the Court- approved Desegregation Plan.\" Yet the district has provided no information or evidence that indicates the degree to which the LRSD may have followed the required plan modification process. The proposal is essentially to combine the funding of APIG and focused activities, although the desegregation plan indicates that schools were to have the opportunity to carry on both focused activities and APIG from separate funding sources: \"The elementary area schools (non-incentive and non-interdistrict) will receive an annual allocation for implementing the focused activities for the school year\" (pg. 31). As for APIG, the plan refers to an annual process where area schools (both elementary and secondary) nay develop proposals in order to receive funding. Subsequent court orders stressed that focused activities and APIG were to remain complementary of each other, and that one was not to supplant the other: \"However, the Court recognizes the [Academic Progress Incentive Grant Program] as a complementary addition to, but not a replacement of. the original focused activities feature of the plan. Focused activities will continue to be an option for area schools. -15-may center around a theme, and will operate according to the original plan which provides for community and parental involvement and an annual allocation of funds.\" (May 1, 1992, pp. 24-25, emphasis original). The record shows that more than 80% of LRSD students attend area schools. Focused activities and APIG were designed to ensure that the vast majority of the district's students would have access to school-based programs and services tailored to help them reach the desegregation goals for academic achievement. As a matter of fact. the business case on cutting incentive school funding states that the cuts will free up more money for the area schools, presumably to help meet the needs of those schools. The district has not persuaded the Court that the prooosal as presented in the July 1994 business case will help promote desegregation goals, nor that it is in the bes interests of the thousands of students who attend area schools. Therefore, the Court does not approve the proposal as submitted. If the district wishes to revisit this area. the Court advises it to consult with ODM and the parties to develop a proposal that will clearly supmort the desegregation plan goals and serve the needs of area school students. Any proposed modification of the desegregation plan must be done in accordance with the requisite procedures. h) Transportation The 1994-95 budget contained a $1.3 million appropriation for transportation, but that allotment was unaccompanied by a plan or business case indicating how the sum would be applied. Testimony at -16-U16 hGaring was tliat $1 million would ba used for buses and the remainder would be spent on other needs. The Court requires the file a plan or business case which explains how the district plans to spend the money on transportation. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October 1994. UNITED STATES DTSTRyCT JUDGE ON , -17-Ual* Xdl Sdi^ Ditiria B5032701 04/06/0900 LRSD PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS PROCESS INSTITUTIONALIZATION PROJECT April 1, 1995 OfTice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Ann S. Brown Monitor Bill Mooney Budget SpecialistLRSD PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS PROCESS INSTITUTIONALIZATION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose B. Background C. What is institutionalization? - Definition D. How will I know it is institutionalized? - Expectations E. Monitoring Process and Information Sources F. Report Organization IL EXPECTATIONS AND FINDINGS A. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budget Process. Reassessment of Process and Organization. (Organization and Process Structure/Reassessment). B. Needs Assessment C. D. E. F. G. H. Program Inventory Planning and Budget Goals Program Development Budgeting Monitoring and Reporting Program Evaluation I. Management Tool III. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 21. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose The purpose of this status report is to informally document for the Judge the extent to which the Little Rock School District (LRSD) has institutionalized the planning, budgeting, and evaluation process as defined in the Program Planning and Budgeting Manual. A secondary purpose is to provide informal standards that might assist the LRSD in developing a quality program planning and budgeting process. - Not many people are interested in the accountability of whether something happened. Most people want to slap it in and go. Not a formal report with formal data collection. Based upon operational observations. In some cases, it was hard to get the information necessary for a determination without formal inquiry. Snapshot of the district as of March 31, 1995. Answer the question is the process institutionalized? 3B. Background History - Early budget and planning problems - 12/91 letter and response - 1-2/92 events leading to Budget Specialist - Budget Specialist - Short projects - PPBP development - LRSD development Considerations - Give LRSD credit for doing what they have done. They do far more than the other districts and the State. - In the report, we must show how the past is the foundation for change. Dont ridicule or downplay the past or old processes. Take things to the next level. - Might include the planning assumptions from the draft project concept paper, B5O1O3O1. 4 C. What is institutionalization? - Definition Objective: to operate a program planning and budgeting process which will support logical decisionmaking at all levels in the LRSD. It is one thing to develop a process, but quite another tohave-it institutionalized, dt. Court Order, 10/24/94, page 5. The district must work to institutionalize the planning and budgeting process throughout all levels of the organization. The process must become a well-understood, standard operating procedure that is well-accepted and consistently practiced as a way of life in the LRSD. The process can be institutionalized only if participants at all levels are actively involved in all aspects on a day-to-day basis. The district must ensure that those who are responsible for managing programs and budgets have a working knowledge of the process and are completely involved in it throughout the year. Before we can determine if the LRSD has institutionalized its processes, we must define institutionalization. Search yielded no useful definition. Create our own. For the purposes of this report, institutionalization is defined as the incorporation of the sub-processes outlined in the Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, into the organizational culture of the LRSD so that these practices become the normal, everyday way of doing business. Part of the problem is that bad processes are already institutionalized, and we are looking for substantive changes to better processes. We want people to really use the improved processes. To reconcile institutionalization and change, we might approach it from this perspective. Now have institutionalized bad processes...change to good processes...move on to culture of continuous change... but not ready to go there yet because of poor state of affairs. - Just because a process is institutionalized does not mean that it never changes. We want the process to be systemic, but we want that systemic process continually subjected to improvement in order to support our changing environment. - Bad word. Institutionalization may be an inappropriate word. Part of todays management philosophy is looking at Peters chaos ideas. They like stuff like draw, shoot, aim. They see this as getting away from institutionalization. - Culture of continuous change. What we are really talking about is getting a culture of positive, controlled, orderly, goal-based, logical model, continuous change within the district. - Change. Changing a culture is not a matter of teaching people a bunch of new techniques, or replacing their behavior patterns with new ones. It is a matter of exchanging values and providing role models. This is done by changing attitudes. Crosby, p98. 5D. How will I know it is institutionalized? - Expectations 1. Define standards..expectations fiom requirements (specific to this process) and good management practices (general for all processes). 2. Measure performance. Expectations in this report are like legal requirements in an ODM monitoring guide\na standard against which to measure. These expectations define the characteristics of an institutionalized process. TTie extent to which those expectations are met, measure the degree of institutionalization. Requires a measure. Process will be as defined in the PPBP Manual. Cite both. What they said they were going to do, not what the other districts are doing or not doing. Measurements against expected performance requirements. Where can I find them? Sources. Question for expectation identification: What would we expect to see in a successful process? subAnswer for expectation identification: We would expect to see positive evidence of Answers: - NOTE...this is not a complete list, different folks might add different ideas. - What do we really want to measure? Something else? Such as the extent to which processes and the associated tools are used? The quality of that use or the entire process? The areas of strength and weakness, or what has worked well and what needs work? Lessons learned? - Quality is not an issue in institutionalization per se - Quality has to be defined as conformance to requirements, not as goodness. Crosby, p64 and p60. - Quality measurement. The measurement of quality is the price of non-conformance, not indexes. Prices of non-conformance are all the expenses involved in doing things wrong (to correct, to do it over, to pay claims). Maybe 35% in LRSD. Price of conformance is what is necessary to spend to make things come out right the first time. Not a simple yes or no, but rather it is usually a matter of degree. 3 6E. Monitoring Process and Information Sources - Look in Court Orders and transcripts for citations of failures to follow the process and institutionalization statements. Look for citations of success to do the same. - Take the requirements/expectations list and go interview the people that should be involved. Retrospective review based on operational observations. No formal data collection. 1. 2. 3. 4. Establish the standards..expectations Retrospective analysis Reviewed documents and monitored performance. No formal data collection since informal project. 7F. Report Organization We want narrative describing each of the sections per table of contents. 8II. EXPECTATIONS AND FINDINGS A. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budget Process. Reassessment of Process and Organization. (Organization and Process Structure/Reassessment) Reference\nProgram Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 1 and page 10. Expectations 1. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the structured planning process is successfully implemented as designed. (PPBM 2, 10) ** Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The strategic planning initiative was started without considering how it fits or works with the processes they already have in place. 2. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a long-range strategic planning process\na process which includes mission, critical analysis, assumptions, action goals, components, objectives, evaluation, action plans, and monitoring. (G2, 121) ** Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The strategic planning initiative was started without considering how it fits or works with the processes they already have in place. 3. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a planning and budgeting cycle calendar prepared under Board guidance. (PPBM 2, 1) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 4. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of an effort by the Board and Superintendent to sell other staff on the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 5. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process,, we would expect to see evidence of a commitment by the Board and Superintendent to embrace and further develop the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. (WMM) 9 * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 6. 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process,, we would expect to see evidence of the Board continuously monitoring the progress of the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. (PPBM2, 1) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process,, we would expect to see evidence that the long-range planning and budget process instills in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the district a sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability, and internal program evaluation by the district. (PPBM 2, 11) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process,, we would expect to see evidence that the Program Planning and Budget Process is coordinated with and successfully interfaces with other district processes. (NCQA, 21) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process,, we would expect to see evidence that the Program Planning and Budget Process has contributed to improvement in the overall management and operations of the district. (NCQA, 51) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that there is a designated senior executive responsible for program implementation. (NCQA, 5) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the lead planning person is positioned to coordinate the Program Planning and Budget Process across the district. (WMM) *  Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Glowers is the lead planning person for the PPBP and Modesta/Young are leading the strategic planning effort. You would think that the designated district planner would lead both efforts so that they could more easily be brought together. 10- Court 3/24/95. Williams and staff unsure of who the lead planner really is. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of key people being involved in the sub-process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of district users at all levels generating continual process improvement so that the process is modified to meet the changing needs of the district. (NCQA, 29) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the administration reviews and evaluates the overall process at least aimually. (PPBM2,10) (NCQA, 7) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the Board has approved the annual plan. * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a mechanism for communicating the Program Planning and Budget Process to the associates, taxpayers, and district patrons. (NCQA, 29) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the sub-process serving as a guide for day-to-day operations within the district. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the sub-process being discussed and used in regular meetings within the district. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence 11of staff understanding of the sub-process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 21. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of associates several levels down recognizing the terminology and being able to describe the elements of the Program Planning and Budgeting Process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 22. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of critical events in the sub-process being properly timed and interfaced with other tasks. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Strategic Planning effort not planned or coordinated with the PPBP. Some Board and administration dont understand that the PPBP has a strategic component. Two processes running separately and apart. - The strategic planning initiative was started without considering how it fits or works with the processes they already have in place. 23. In the Organization and Reassessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of sub-process tasks being completed on time or early. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 12B. Needs Assessment Reference: Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 2. Expectations 1. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess meeting or exceeding the purposes for which it was designed. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 2. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of determining the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations. (PPBM 2, 1) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 3. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a document which identifies a need as the variance between the goal/objective and the current 2+4^ position. (SPE) (PPBM 2, 2) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization j^e district is poorly executing many elements of the planning, evaluation, and budgeting process, thus failing to forge the links between planning, evaluation, and budgeting that will ensure that money is spent wisely and that desegregation promises are ke^\u0026gt;For example, we have seen in the Needs Assessment that needs did not drive recommendations. Indeed, the Needs Assessment listed no needs at all. 1994-95 cycle. (Fl6) - The products of the subprocesses are frequently slow, of low quality, or missing altogether, and need to be improved substantially. For example, I see uneven and frequently poor quality in such subprocesses as needs assessment and facilities study. 94-95 was poor, but 95-96 better. Still not measuring gap. (Fl6) 4. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of both perceptual and empirical data collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. (PPBM 2, 2) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Decision-making is not based on defined decision-making processes nor the results of the process. Decisions are frequently made without data\nrather they appear to be arbitrary or based on personal opinions and 13feelings, customary procedures, or administrative prerogative. For example, you admit that you have repeatedly failed to involve the Intervenors in appropriate ways and at appropriate times. Yesterday, we heard that you didnt reach out to Joshua enough. (Fl6) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a document listing needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that are rank ordered based on supporting data. (PPBM 2, 3) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a district-wide facilities section. (G2, 109) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The last version of the facilities study was not planned, and there was no change in the project management report to reflect the changing work picture and timeline. - The products of the subprocesses are frequently slow, of low quality, or missing altogether, and need to be improved substantially. For example, I see uneven and frequently poor quality in such subprocesses as needs assessment and facilities study. 94-95 was poor, but 95-96 better. Still not measuring gap. (Fl6) - The processes are not being used to manage and improve the district, nor are they yet institutionalized, and I see little evidence of efforts to make them so. For example, as the district considered closing schools, it had no current long-range facilities study to guide those decisions and prepare the community for them. (Fl6) - Facilities Study not tasked out, included in the PM tool, and managed to. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the needs assessment document reflects objectives from the desegregation plan and various desegregation plan audits. (A7) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the superintendent is directing the administration team to conduct a desegregation plan audit and related budget proposals. (A5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of key people 14being involved in the sub-process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Decision-making is not based on defined decision-making processes nor the results of the process. Decisions are frequently made without data\nrather they appear to be arbitrary or based on personal opinions and feelings, customary procedures, or administrative prerogative. For example, you admit that you have repeatedly failed to involve the Intervenors in appropriate ways and at appropriate times. Yesterday, we heard that you didnt reach out to Joshua enough. (Fl6) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of input from each of the organizational and functional units in the district for inclusion in the plan. (G2) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess serving as a guide for day-to-day operations within the district. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of staff understanding of the sub-process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of sub-process tasks being completed on time or early. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The desegregation audit update was completed in 11/94, but was not filed until 2/95, and only after Mooney asked about it. A well-functioning process would have had this step planned into the project management report. - The district lacks discipline on timelines and does not manage them, therefore, it is almost always late on everything. Intermediate and final deadlines of all types are repeatedly pushed back, missed, or ignored altogether. For example, you missed the needs assessment deadline by several months, the junior high capacity study was months late, and an audit of student assignment is still incomplete. (Fl6) In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a plan for 15c disseminating the Broad-Based Feedback. (PPBM 2, 3) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 5. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of Broad-Based Feedback to the Town Hall and District Dialogue participants. (PPBM 2, 3) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 16. In the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of positive community support in recognition of the thoroughly planned budgeting process. (PPBM 2, 3) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 1 17. In the Broad-Based Feedback section of the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the LRSD works with the MRC prior to implementing reorganization or budget reduction plans that would affect the programming or staff at the magnet schools. (Fl3) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 18. In the Broad-Based Feedback section of the Needs Assessment Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the district works with the McClellan Community High School Advisory Council as a means for promoting community involvement and input so that whatever changes are proposed for the school will reflect the community's needs and wishes\nthat the council is meaningfully involved in all changes at McClellan, including budget, planning and adjustment\nand that the committee helps the district monitor the effect of the budget cuts on the community school program, recommends any appropriate changes that will enable the program to achieve its goals economically but effectively, and works with the district in planning the community school program budget. (Fl4) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Problems with McClellan business case. 167 L 17C. Program Inventory Reference: Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 4. Expectations 1. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the process meeting or exceeding the purposes for which it was designed. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 2. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the program inventory identifies cunent desegregation and non-desegregation programs. (PPBM 2, 4) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 3. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a standard district format for clearly identifying programs, defining programs, documenting program purpose, and developing program measurements. The format should include a written program description that outlines program structure and design. (WMMSP) (NCQA, 1) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 4. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a standard expense coding scheme which will link those identified programs to expenditures. (WMMSP) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 5. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of key people being involved in the sub-process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 6. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the program description is reviewed aimually and updated as necessary. (NCQA, 4) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 187. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess serving as a guide for day-to-day operations within the district. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 8. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of sub-process tasks being completed on time or early. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization  Negative examples of institutionalization 9. In the Program Inventory Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of staff understanding of the sub-process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 19D. Planning and Budget Goals Reference: Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 4. Expectations 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess meeting or exceeding the purposes for which it was designed. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Task 196 Board Retreat Work Session was designed to review material prior to going into the program development sub-process. The Board session was subsequently used for the bonding session, and written off as completed. This would indicate that the district did not have a firm idea of what the process was doing. Had this awareness been present, they would have simply added a task for the bonding session and continued on about business. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a defined, written district-wide mission statement, and goals and objectives published by the Board and the Superintendent. (G2, 32) (PPBM 2,1) (PPBM 2, 4) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of long range planning directed at goals and objectives. (G2, 32) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of defined expected outcomes. (PPBM 2, 4) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the district-wide goals. (PPBM 2, 5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of clear delineation oft, the district's desegregation mission to the staff and the community. (Fl 5, 7) 20* * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 7. 8. 9. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the district utilizing the desegregation mission as a guide for developing policies and setting expectations for the superintendent to implement those policies. (Fl5, 7) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objectives Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that goals and objectives are established for the same 3/5 year span covered by the revenue and expense projections. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of key people being involved in the sub-process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 10. 11. 12. 13. In the Goal and Objectives Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the superintendent is directing a process for Board involvement in the long-range planning and budgeting process. (A5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess serving as a guide for day-to-day operations within the district. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of resources (people, time, material) directed toward and effort focused on accomplishment of established goals and objectives. (G2, 32) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of published program objectives by the Council and Cabinet which would satisfy the established district goals. (PPBM 2, 4) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 2114. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of published, written priorities by the Board to guide staflF in program modification, program development, and funding and resource allocation. (PPBM 2, 5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 15. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of developed strategies for funding shortfalls. (PPBM 2, 5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 16. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess incorporated into the policies and procedures of the district. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 17. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of sub-process tasks being completed on time or early. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 18. 19. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of st^ understanding of the sub-process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that ^taff know the goals and objectives, particularly the ones to which their unit must contribute. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 20. In the Goal and Objective Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the goals and objectives are known and supported by district employees. (OA, 217) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 22E. Program Development Reference: Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 5. Expectations 1. 2. 3. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess meeting or exceeding the purposes for which it was designed. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Memo from Williams on 1/26/95 says the business cases are in draft form and cannot be given out. The business cases were to have been submitted to the Superintendent on 1/13/95. The case should be final at that point, if no further information is required. Yet the Superintendent seems to think they are only final after he has approved them. This does not show much confidence in your staff, and is an attempt to keep them secret as long as possible. - The operations of the district are not driven by nor do they flow from the level of mission and goals. I see little focus toward that level and little progress in the direction of fulfilling the districts mission. For example, although I heard testimony yesterday that everything the district does is focused on the desegregation plan, the evidence indicates that there is an acute lack of comprehensive, coordinated, and consistent focus on implementing the plan. (Fl6) In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of programs developed to achieve objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plan and settlement agreement. (PPBM 2, 1) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Middle School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Task 218 (12/22/94). If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Beacon School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Letter from Williams to Brown, dated 11/11/94 confirms this, institutionalized. If you are not following the process, it is not In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of established and measured performance standards and expenditures. (PPBM 2, 1) 23* Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 4. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a district plan and corresponding timeline for reaching the 90% achievement goal for black students, thereby attaining forgiveness of state loans the district otherwise must repay. (F8) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 5. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a logical decision-making process, consistent throughout all levels of the organization, and based on research, information, cost/benefit analysis, analysis of alternatives and on program goals and performance. (G2,119) (CMA,217) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Middle School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Task 218 (12/22/94). If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Beacon School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Letter from Williams to Brown, dated 11/11/94 confirms this, institutionalized. If you are not following the process, it is not - Decision-making is not based on defined decision-making processes nor the results of the process. Decisions are frequently made without data\nrather they appear to be arbitrary or based on personal opinions and feelings, customary procedures, or administrative prerogative. For example, business cases are not used to guide decision-making but rather to justify decisions after the fact. (F16) - Decision-making is not based on defined decision-making processes nor the results of the process. Decisions are frequently made without data\nrather they appear to be arbitrary or based on personal opinions and feelings, customary procedures, or administrative prerogative. For example, the issue of the proposed savings of $2 million in incentive school double funding, yet there is no business case or even an explanation of how the district arrived at this number. (Fl 6) 6. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the district is exercising appropriate stewardship such as in management of programs and personnel. (FIO) * Positive examples of institutionalization 24* Negative examples of institutionalization 7. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the goals and objectives, the needs assessment, the program inventory, and the program evaluations being used in the decision-making process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 8. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of information prepared for corrective decision-making. (PPBM 2, 1) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 9. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of a comparison between the identified needs and the program inventory to determine gaps in program coverage. (PPBM 2, 3) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization 10. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the Position Control System being used to provide accurate and timely decision-making information. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 11. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of regular use of the business case decision procedure at all levels in the district. (WMMSP) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Middle School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Task 218 (12/22/94). If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Beacon School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Letter from Williams to Brown, dated 11/11/94 confirms this, institutionalized. If you are not following the process, it is not - The district is poorly executing many elements of the planning, evaluation, and budgeting process, thus failing to forge the links between planning, evaluation, and budgeting that will ensure that money is spent wisely and that desegregation promises are kept. For example, the business cases that are increasingly weak in resource and cost 25analysis. (Fl6) - The products of the subprocesses are frequently slow, of low quality, or missing altogether, and need to be improved substantially. For example, I see uneven and frequently poor quality in such subprocesses as business cases. (Fl6) - Business cases show that LRSD has not learned the planning process. Poor quality, used for justification rather than decision-making. Limited alternatives appears to be manipulative. (WMM) - Magnet School grant initiative y^re started without the benefit of a business case. Had a business case been prepared properly, we could have prevented all of the district effort, setting a hearing, grant preparation, canceling a hearing, calling the whole thing off. We should have done it right the first time. ( 12. 13. 14. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of identification and analysis of alternatives before decisions are finalized. (OA, 220) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Middle School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Task 218 (12/22/94). If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Beacon School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Letter from Williams to Brown, dated 11/11/94 confirms this. If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Magnet School grant initiative were started without the benefit of a business case. Had a business case been prepared properly, we could have prevented all of the district effort, setting a hearing, grant preparation, canceling a hearing, calling the whole thing off. We should have done it right the first time. - Incentive School business case on new alternative. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the district is making budgetary decisions consistent with district desegregation policies in terms of buildings, staff, materials, and equipment. (F15(^ 7 * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the subprocess serving as a guide for day-to-day operations and decision-making within the district. (WMM) 26* * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - If the PPBP were part of everyday operations, we would expect some effort to modify job descriptions to cover the support of the process. This has not been done. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of developing or modifying programs to support identified needs. (PPBM 2, 5) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that program additions, modifications, or deletions are supported by business cases. (PPBM 2, 5 and 6) *  Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Middle School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Task 218 (12/22/94). If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. - Beacon School initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. Not on the business case listing. Letter from Williams to Brown, dated 11/11/94 confirms this, institutionalized. If you are not following the process, it is not - Strategic Planning initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the elimination of programs not supporting the identified needs. (PPBM 2, 5) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of changes to the Program Budget Document as a result of program additions, modifications, or deletions. (PPBM 2, 6) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of key people being involved in the process. (WMM) * Positive examples of institutionalization 27* Negative examples of institutionalization - The operations of the district are not driven by nor do they flow from the level of mission and goals. I see little focus toward that level and little progress in the direction of fulfilling the districts mission. For example, you have not adequately helped the community anticipate change, nor understand the reasons behind certain changes, nor allowed then to participate in some important decisions (such as closing schools), causing feelings of fear, frustration, and even betrayal among parents and other citizens. (Fl6) - Williams not responding to the ODM request for business cases and extended evaluations demonstrates the level of cooperation of the district. 20. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of staff understanding of the sub-process. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Strategic Planning initiative generated outside of the PPBP. Moved on it without a business case, or business case after the fact. If you are not following the process, it is not institutionalized. 21. In the Program Development Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of subprocess tasks being completed on time or early. (WMM) *  Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - Scheduling flaws indicate a lack of understanding of what is happening in the process. Desegregation Plan modifications, per Mayos report, will not be submitted to the Board until 3/95. This is after the proposed budget, and at least a month late in the process. For such controversial items, the Board should get any plan modification proposals at least a month and a half before the proposed budget is put together. - The products of the subprocesses are frequently slow, of low quality, or missing altogether, and need to be improved substantially. For example, I see that the district is very slow to produce data that should be driving important decisions, such as a student assignment audit. (Fl6) - The district lacks discipline on timelines and does not manage them, therefore, it is almost always late on everything. Intermediate and final deadlines of all types are repeatedly pushed back, missed, or ignored altogether. For example, you are still contemplating incentive school modifications and should have been done during the program development and evaluation subprocesses. (Fl6) 28n - Open houses and pre-registration occur before decisions on school closings. Consequently, parents will not have the opportunity to visit possible alternatives and will have to go through the registration process again after the decision. Should have been timed better. See Mayo memo of 1/6/95. - The districts poor execution and timing is shown in their handling of registration. The pre-registration brochures are sent out the week of 2/6. They announced the open houses which were the week of 1/28. 29F. Budgeting Reference: Program Planning and Budgeting Manual, dated 8/24/94, page 6. Expectations 1. In the Budgeting Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence of the sub-process meeting or exceeding the purposes for which it was designed. (WMM) * * Positive examples of institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The LRSDs July 18, 1994 budget submission reflects no significant advances in decision-making nor meaningful progress toward a 1994- 95 budget that is accurate, complete, and final. (ODM hearing preparation, 7/28-29/94) - The LRSDs July 18, 1994 budget submission is inaccurate and incomplete, thereby failing to meet the Order requirements. (ODM hearing preparation, 7/28-29/94 - Some of the budget document information is better. Improving with each budget cycle. 2. In the Budgeting Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that budgets are the direct result of genuine planning. (OA, 219)   Positive examplesof institutionalization Negative examples of institutionalization - The LRSD budgeting is top-down rather than bottom-up, forcing the figures to fit the bottom line instead of deriving the bottom line from the financial facts. (ODM hearing preparation, 7/28-29/94 - The district is poorly executing many elements of the planning, evaluation, and budgeting process, thus failing to forge the links between planning, evaluation, and budgeting that will ensure that money is spent wisely and that desegregation promises are kept. For example, you are using non-recurring revenue sources to fund recurring expenses. (Fl6) 3. In the Budgeting Sub-process, we would expect to see evidence that the budget is viewed as a comprehensive planning document driven by curriculum needs. (FIO) * Positive examples of institutionalization * Negative examples of institutionalization 4. In the Budgeting Sub-process, we\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":355,"next_page":356,"prev_page":354,"total_pages":3369,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":4248,"total_count":40428,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":307},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":37},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":34},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":23},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"worksheets","hits":5},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":4},{"value":"study guides","hits":4},{"value":"learning modules","hits":3},{"value":"slide shows","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"Sound","hits":1050},{"value":"StillImage","hits":803},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":213},{"value":"Collection","hits":10},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2076},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":1425},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":777},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":464},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":397},{"value":"AFL-CIO. Civil Rights Department","hits":326},{"value":"Hunter, Charles N., approximately 1851-1931","hits":323},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":244}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Race relations","hits":4661},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":3223},{"value":"People--Ethnic Groups--Hispanics","hits":2928},{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":2321},{"value":"African Americans","hits":1792},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1747},{"value":"Civil rights--South Carolina","hits":1739},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Mississippi","hits":1550},{"value":"League of United Latin American Citizens","hits":1531},{"value":"LULAC","hits":1517},{"value":"Race","hits":1483}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1501},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1413},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":713},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":639},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":623},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":582},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":582},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":418}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2592},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1497},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":622},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":579},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":360},{"value":"De Laine, Joseph A. (Joseph Armstrong), 1898-1974","hits":345},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":315},{"value":"Samet, Seymour, 1919-2014","hits":279}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1567},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":663},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":386},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":299},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":188},{"value":"Birmingham Bombing (Sixteenth Street Baptist Church)","hits":125},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":104},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":83},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":68},{"value":"Brown versus Board of Education","hits":55},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":43}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":10939},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4304},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":3804},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":3648},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2519},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2032},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1863},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":1801},{"value":"United States, Texas, Harris County, Houston, 29.76328, -95.36327","hits":1564},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":1236},{"value":"United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729","hits":1198}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"South Carolina","hits":6466},{"value":"Georgia","hits":5551},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":3826},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":3452},{"value":"Texas","hits":3432},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":2359},{"value":"Alabama","hits":2352},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1657},{"value":"New York","hits":1561},{"value":"Florida","hits":1185},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":1167}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1962","hits":5885},{"value":"1964","hits":5684},{"value":"1963","hits":5401},{"value":"1965","hits":5249},{"value":"1966","hits":5016},{"value":"1961","hits":4941},{"value":"1968","hits":4914},{"value":"1967","hits":4901},{"value":"1969","hits":4708},{"value":"1960","hits":4681},{"value":"1957","hits":4182},{"value":"1958","hits":4010},{"value":"1977","hits":3976},{"value":"1959","hits":3971},{"value":"1971","hits":3904},{"value":"1970","hits":3870},{"value":"1976","hits":3790},{"value":"1955","hits":3718},{"value":"1974","hits":3664},{"value":"1972","hits":3650},{"value":"1975","hits":3649},{"value":"1956","hits":3611},{"value":"1973","hits":3461},{"value":"1994","hits":3357},{"value":"1995","hits":3332},{"value":"1950","hits":3315},{"value":"1978","hits":3266},{"value":"1954","hits":3261},{"value":"1979","hits":3249},{"value":"1996","hits":3225},{"value":"1980","hits":3158},{"value":"1948","hits":3126},{"value":"1953","hits":3050},{"value":"1997","hits":3036},{"value":"1949","hits":3022},{"value":"1998","hits":2990},{"value":"1999","hits":2983},{"value":"1952","hits":2967},{"value":"1947","hits":2958},{"value":"1951","hits":2907},{"value":"1981","hits":2856},{"value":"2000","hits":2833},{"value":"2001","hits":2792},{"value":"2002","hits":2693},{"value":"1982","hits":2691},{"value":"1946","hits":2690},{"value":"2003","hits":2675},{"value":"1983","hits":2652},{"value":"1945","hits":2610},{"value":"1985","hits":2584},{"value":"1943","hits":2578},{"value":"1944","hits":2577},{"value":"1984","hits":2573},{"value":"1942","hits":2499},{"value":"1941","hits":2473},{"value":"1940","hits":2447},{"value":"1986","hits":2438},{"value":"1939","hits":2375},{"value":"1930","hits":2352},{"value":"1938","hits":2341},{"value":"1937","hits":2323},{"value":"1936","hits":2303},{"value":"2004","hits":2296},{"value":"2005","hits":2270},{"value":"1931","hits":2252},{"value":"1990","hits":2186},{"value":"1987","hits":2183},{"value":"1991","hits":2181},{"value":"1935","hits":2174},{"value":"2006","hits":2165},{"value":"1934","hits":2161},{"value":"1933","hits":2160},{"value":"1932","hits":2150},{"value":"1992","hits":2139},{"value":"1993","hits":2123},{"value":"1989","hits":1879},{"value":"1929","hits":1874},{"value":"1988","hits":1753},{"value":"1928","hits":1509},{"value":"1921","hits":1393},{"value":"1925","hits":1275},{"value":"1927","hits":1272},{"value":"1926","hits":1266},{"value":"1924","hits":1263},{"value":"1923","hits":1208},{"value":"1922","hits":1188},{"value":"1920","hits":1187},{"value":"2007","hits":1029},{"value":"2011","hits":1029},{"value":"2008","hits":1017},{"value":"2010","hits":992},{"value":"2009","hits":980},{"value":"2012","hits":967},{"value":"2013","hits":965},{"value":"2014","hits":924},{"value":"2016","hits":876},{"value":"1919","hits":850},{"value":"1918","hits":849},{"value":"1900","hits":831},{"value":"2015","hits":826}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":301323,"missing":11},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"correspondence","hits":9610},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4200},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3564},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1925},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1690},{"value":"records (documents)","hits":1429},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":1385},{"value":"reports","hits":1362},{"value":"clippings (information artifacts)","hits":1156},{"value":"articles","hits":903},{"value":"transcripts","hits":816}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":13560},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":9168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8110},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6150},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1673},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":1494},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":40},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/","hits":20},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":12},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-OW-EU/1.0/","hits":2},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3271},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1843},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1717},{"value":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","hits":1696},{"value":"Memphis World","hits":1484},{"value":"James W. Silver Collection","hits":1430},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":1423},{"value":"Integration Correspondence","hits":1420},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":1403}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":3821},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":3419},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3316},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3287},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3250},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2174},{"value":"South Carolina Digital Library","hits":2167},{"value":"University of South Carolina. South Carolina Political Collections","hits":1793},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":1663},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":1641},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":1435}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":40191},{"value":"Collection","hits":237}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":40278},{"value":"true","hits":150}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}