{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"mus_sovcom_2-45-2","title":"Leflore County","collection_id":"mus_sovcom","collection_title":"Sovereignty Commission Online","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission"],"dc_date":["1994/2006"],"dcterms_description":["Records collected by the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission on","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["from Leflore County, Sovereignty Commission records, Mississippi Department of Archives and History"],"dc_relation":["Forms part of Series 2515 : Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records Online, 1994-2006"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Mississippi","Civil rights workers--Mississippi","African American civil rights workers--Mississippi","Social reformers--Mississippi","Mississippi--Race relations--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Leflore County"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Mississippi. Department of Archives and History"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.mdah.ms.gov/arrec/digital_archives/sovcom/imagelisting.php?foldercheckbox%5B%5D=200%7C2%7C45%7C%7C2"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records are state government records made available to the public pursuant to American Civil Liberties Union v. Fordice, 969 F.Supp. 403 (S.D.Miss.1994). The web-enabled version of the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records is intended for public use in research, teaching, and private study in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). MDAH makes no warranty or assurances that materials contained in this collection are free from U.S. copyright claims or other restrictions on free use and display. It is the user's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions when publishing or distributing materials found in this collection. MDAH requests that prior to publication of Sov. Com. images the user submit an MDAH Broadcast/Publication Permission form for approval by the Department. This form must be accompanied by documentation which proves that copyright requirements have been satisfied. Contact MDAH Reference Staff for details on how to obtain and complete the B/PP form: (601) 576 6876 or refdesk@mdah.state.ms.us. There are no MDAH Use Fees associated with use of Sov. Com. images. MDAH asks that each image used in a presentation, display, or publication be accompanied by a credit line, which at a minimum includes the name of this collection, the unique resource identifier for each image, the name of this institution, and URL. ; Cite images according to the following structure: Original Creator, \"Title\", Original creation date (if known), Unique Resource Identifier, Series Number and Title, Archival Repository, date of last web page revision, image location/URL, (image viewed on date)."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":null,"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"mus_sovcom_11-1-0","title":"Leonard Fredericks","collection_id":"mus_sovcom","collection_title":"Sovereignty Commission Online","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission"],"dc_date":["1994/2006"],"dcterms_description":["Records collected by the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission on","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["from Leonard Fredericks, Sovereignty Commission records, Mississippi Department of Archives and History"],"dc_relation":["Forms part of Series 2515 : Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records Online, 1994-2006"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Mississippi","Civil rights workers--Mississippi","African American civil rights workers--Mississippi","Social reformers--Mississippi","Mississippi--Race relations--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Leonard Fredericks"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Mississippi. Department of Archives and History"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.mdah.ms.gov/arrec/digital_archives/sovcom/imagelisting.php?foldercheckbox%5B%5D=798%7C11%7C1%7C%7C0"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records are state government records made available to the public pursuant to American Civil Liberties Union v. Fordice, 969 F.Supp. 403 (S.D.Miss.1994). The web-enabled version of the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records is intended for public use in research, teaching, and private study in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). MDAH makes no warranty or assurances that materials contained in this collection are free from U.S. copyright claims or other restrictions on free use and display. It is the user's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions when publishing or distributing materials found in this collection. MDAH requests that prior to publication of Sov. Com. images the user submit an MDAH Broadcast/Publication Permission form for approval by the Department. This form must be accompanied by documentation which proves that copyright requirements have been satisfied. Contact MDAH Reference Staff for details on how to obtain and complete the B/PP form: (601) 576 6876 or refdesk@mdah.state.ms.us. There are no MDAH Use Fees associated with use of Sov. Com. images. MDAH asks that each image used in a presentation, display, or publication be accompanied by a credit line, which at a minimum includes the name of this collection, the unique resource identifier for each image, the name of this institution, and URL. ; Cite images according to the following structure: Original Creator, \"Title\", Original creation date (if known), Unique Resource Identifier, Series Number and Title, Archival Repository, date of last web page revision, image location/URL, (image viewed on date)."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":null,"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"mus_sovcom_1-48-0","title":"Levye Chapple","collection_id":"mus_sovcom","collection_title":"Sovereignty Commission Online","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission"],"dc_date":["1994/2006"],"dcterms_description":["Records collected by the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission on","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["from Levye Chapple, Sovereignty Commission records, Mississippi Department of Archives and History"],"dc_relation":["Forms part of Series 2515 : Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records Online, 1994-2006"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Mississippi","Civil rights workers--Mississippi","African American civil rights workers--Mississippi","Social reformers--Mississippi","Mississippi--Race relations--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Levye Chapple"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Mississippi. Department of Archives and History"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.mdah.ms.gov/arrec/digital_archives/sovcom/imagelisting.php?foldercheckbox%5B%5D=65%7C1%7C48%7C%7C0"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records are state government records made available to the public pursuant to American Civil Liberties Union v. Fordice, 969 F.Supp. 403 (S.D.Miss.1994). The web-enabled version of the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records is intended for public use in research, teaching, and private study in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). MDAH makes no warranty or assurances that materials contained in this collection are free from U.S. copyright claims or other restrictions on free use and display. It is the user's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions when publishing or distributing materials found in this collection. MDAH requests that prior to publication of Sov. Com. images the user submit an MDAH Broadcast/Publication Permission form for approval by the Department. This form must be accompanied by documentation which proves that copyright requirements have been satisfied. Contact MDAH Reference Staff for details on how to obtain and complete the B/PP form: (601) 576 6876 or refdesk@mdah.state.ms.us. There are no MDAH Use Fees associated with use of Sov. Com. images. MDAH asks that each image used in a presentation, display, or publication be accompanied by a credit line, which at a minimum includes the name of this collection, the unique resource identifier for each image, the name of this institution, and URL. ; Cite images according to the following structure: Original Creator, \"Title\", Original creation date (if known), Unique Resource Identifier, Series Number and Title, Archival Repository, date of last web page revision, image location/URL, (image viewed on date)."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":null,"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"mus_sovcom_2-30-0","title":"Lincoln County, Miss.","collection_id":"mus_sovcom","collection_title":"Sovereignty Commission Online","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission"],"dc_date":["1994/2006"],"dcterms_description":["Records collected by the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission on","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["from Lincoln County, Miss., Sovereignty Commission records, Mississippi Department of Archives and History"],"dc_relation":["Forms part of Series 2515 : Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records Online, 1994-2006"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Mississippi","Civil rights workers--Mississippi","African American civil rights workers--Mississippi","Social reformers--Mississippi","Mississippi--Race relations--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Lincoln County, Miss."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Mississippi. Department of Archives and History"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://www.mdah.ms.gov/arrec/digital_archives/sovcom/imagelisting.php?foldercheckbox%5B%5D=119%7C2%7C30%7C%7C0"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["The Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records are state government records made available to the public pursuant to American Civil Liberties Union v. Fordice, 969 F.Supp. 403 (S.D.Miss.1994). The web-enabled version of the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission Records is intended for public use in research, teaching, and private study in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). MDAH makes no warranty or assurances that materials contained in this collection are free from U.S. copyright claims or other restrictions on free use and display. It is the user's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions when publishing or distributing materials found in this collection. MDAH requests that prior to publication of Sov. Com. images the user submit an MDAH Broadcast/Publication Permission form for approval by the Department. This form must be accompanied by documentation which proves that copyright requirements have been satisfied. Contact MDAH Reference Staff for details on how to obtain and complete the B/PP form: (601) 576 6876 or refdesk@mdah.state.ms.us. There are no MDAH Use Fees associated with use of Sov. Com. images. MDAH asks that each image used in a presentation, display, or publication be accompanied by a credit line, which at a minimum includes the name of this collection, the unique resource identifier for each image, the name of this institution, and URL. ; Cite images according to the following structure: Original Creator, \"Title\", Original creation date (if known), Unique Resource Identifier, Series Number and Title, Archival Repository, date of last web page revision, image location/URL, (image viewed on date)."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":null,"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_478","title":"\"\"Little Rock School District, Districtwide Biracial Committee Monitoring Report on Incentive Schools,\"\" Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department, Fourth quarter summary report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["\"\"Little Rock School District, Districtwide Biracial Committee Monitoring Report on Incentive Schools,\"\" Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department, Fourth quarter summary report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/478"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED SEP 2 0 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT ON INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Little Rock, Arkansas July 1995 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Equitable Placement by Race/Gender in School Programs Curriculum School/District Initiated Honors and Awards Committees Extended Day Educational Opportunities Student Achievement/Assessment Special Education Gifted and Talented Education Staff Development Parental Involvement Student Discipline Building Leadership/Management Page 3 4 8 9 10 12 13 15 17 19 22 25LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT The Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan mandates that \"the incentive schools will be monitored at least once each quarter by members of the districtwide biracial committee (page 224) The monitoring instrument and Standard Operating Procedures for Monitoring are provided to principals prior to the visits with instructions for these instruments to be shared with their school staffs. The visits are scheduled cooperatively with each principal. The Desegregation Plan further directs that \"quarterly reports summarizing all the monitoring visits will be prepared by personnel from the Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department and presented through the superintendent to the Board of Directors of the LRSD during a regular meeting (page 225).\" Progress or lack of progress is reported concerning the following areas: Separation of Races in School Programs Curriculum School/District Initiated Honors/Awards Committees Extracurricular Activities Student Achievement/Assessment Special Education Gifted and Talented Education Staff Development Parental Involvement Student Discipline Building Leadership/ManagementDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 2 Each team reviews a school profile which contains basic information related to current conditions in the monitored areas. The school profile information is verified through the school visit and interviews with school personnel. This report provides a summary of visits conducted May 2, 1995 and May 25, 1995. The school reports identify conditions that were evident on the day of the visit. Many acceptable conditions were observed by the monitors during the visits. However, the intent of this report is to identify the degree to which each school is progressing toward the goals of desegregation (See LRSD Desegregation Plan pages 28-29) . At the conclusion of each visit. a conference is held with the building principal or designee to review the findings of the team. Upon completion of the process described above, reports from the incentive school monitoring teams are forwarded to the LRSD Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. The Desegregation Plan states that \"the associate superintendent for desegregation will be responsible for insuring that deficiencies listed in the monitoring reports are eliminated in a timely manner (page 225).\" During the 1994-95 academic year, only two incentive schools. Rightsell and Franklin, were monitored by members of the Districtwide Biracial Committee. A three member team monitored Rightsell on May 2, 1995\nhowever, the team did not submit aDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 3 consensus report. Therefore, the writer of this summary report prepared the consensus report for Rightsell. Franklin was monitored on May 25, 1995 by one Districtwide Biracial Committee member\nthus, the consensus report for that school represents the views of only one person. 1.0 EQUITABLE PLACEMENT BY RACE/GENDER IN SCHOOL PROGRAMS At each school the monitors expected to find: Racially balanced (at least 25 % black) certified and (at least 25 % white) non-certified staff reflecting appropriate percentage Racial/Gender Balance (at least 25 % black) in staff assignments, programs, content areas, and grade level Strategies to increase the enrollment of white students FINDINGS: FRANKLIN According to the report submitted, the composition of the school staff ensured that students had access to, and contact with, a varied staff of certified and non-certified personnel. Furthermore, the report indicated that class enrollments generally reflected the racial/ethnic composition of the school. It was noted that because there were so few white students, the principal, to the degree possible, usually placed those students in the same classroom so as not to place them in racial isolation. As a result, there were severalDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 4 classes with an enrollment of only black students, as per the report. An area of concern indicated by the report was that the school enrollment did not reflect the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court approved desegregation plan. According to the report, ninety percent of the students were black. RIGHTSELL The team from Rightsell noted that the composition of the school staff was an area of concern because the racial composition of the staff did not ensure that students had access to, and contact with, a varied staff of certified and non-certified personnel. In total, 79% of the staff was black, with a non-certified staff that was only five percent white and a certified staff of 64% black personnel. The reports indicated that a number of classes consisted solely of black students. Response from Principal(s): None 2.0 CURRICULUM At each school the monitors expected to find: Interaction among students promoted by classroom seating patterns An adequacy of materials and equipment to support theDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 5 prescribed curriculum (Adequacy - can you implement the curriculum with what you have?) Varied teaching strategies reflected by display of student work Evidence of assessment/reteaching/retesting, when necessary Current and complete documentation of student progress Teachers demonstrating use of multiculturally infused curriculum (guides) Students participating in heterogeneous (mixed) groups to allow for cross racial/gender interaction, to the degree population permits Displays of bulletin boards, materials, and publications that reflect the cultural diversity of the student population and/or multiculturalism Peer tutoring/Cooperative Learning Group Evidence of hands-on discovery and exploratory approaches to teaching: - use of science lab - display of project - use of math manipulatives FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN No areas of concern relative to the \"Curriculum\" area of the monitoring instrument were reported for Franklin School. A majority of the teachers interviewed indicated that they had adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. However, the monitor reported that one teacher expressed the need for more materials but had not requestedDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 6 any because she/he felt discouraged from doing so. According to the report submitted, student folders and other appropriate records were either on file or in view in each classroom monitored. All students were actively involved in classroom instruction in all classrooms visited\nexamples of student activities cited: group discussions and independent student work. It was impossible to document displays and bulletin boards of multiculturalism throughout the building because most of them had been removed in order to facilitate painting. However, the report indicated that selected classrooms had a variety of displays and print materials featuring African, Asian, Native Americans, and European cultures. Displays of student work were quite evident in the classrooms for the lower grade students\nbecause of the painting in progress at the school, student work had been removed from the upper grade classrooms. The report indicated that not enough evidence was available to determine if the multicultural objectives of the curriculum guide were being taught. The four-year old classes had completed a comprehensive unit on Germany, Hawaii, Japan, and Mexico, but several teachers at other grade levels were unable to provide any specific information about multiculturalDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 7 study other than African of African-American cultures, according to the monitor. It was reported that acquisitions to the library media center were driven by the school curriculum and recommendations in professional journals. RIGHTSELL A majority of the reports submitted by monitors at Rightsell indicated that bulletin boards, displays of projects, etc., reflecting the racial/ethnic/gender differences of the student body and/or multiculturalism were in evidence. Examples cited: \"Greetings from Around the World,\" information about Egypt and Norway\ndisplays of famous black Americans, and pictures of famous white Americans. Multiculturalism was also depicted in a majority of the classrooms visited. Monitors further indicated that student work was on display. Teachers of all classrooms visited indicated that they had adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum, according to reports submitted. Monitors also noted that current and complete student records were maintained in the classroom and school office to monitor the progress in achievement of the individual learner.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 8 Monitors further indicated that all students were actively involved in classroom instruction in each classroom visited\nexamples of instructional activities cited: group instruction and teacher directed instruction. Additionally, classroom seating patterns promoted interaction among students of different races/genders, as per reports. In a majority of the classrooms monitored, multicultural objectives of the curriculum guides were taught via the use of hands-on art, newspapers, visual aids, etc. Response from Principal(s): None 3.0 SCHOOL/DISTRICT INITIATED HONORS AND AWARDS At each school the monitors expected to find: A variety of awards and honors Evidence of written procedures and requirements governing honors and awards have been distributed to staff, students and parents A process to evaluate the honors and awards program for equity Plans to eliminate any racial/gender inequities relative to distribution of honors and awards FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN The report from Franklin indicated that a variety of honors and awards was provided in areas such as scholarship.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 9 citizenship, sports, clubs, and attendance. Written procedures and requirements governing honors and awards were distributed to staff, students, and parents, according to the monitor. Distribution methods cited: Bulletins were sent home at the beginning of the year, and newsletters and bulletins were sent home periodically. The offerings and procedures regarding honors and awards were evaluated regularly for equity and to determine if new awards were necessary to meet student needs, as per the report. The distribution of honors and awards generally reflected the school population, with 90% of the citations received by black students. RIGHTSELL The team from Rightsell did not monitor the area of \"School/District Initiated Honors and Awards.\" Response from Principal(s): None 4.0 COMMITTEES At each school the monitors expected to find: Racial/gender composition of appointed school-based committees (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) generally reflects the school populationDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 10 FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN According to the Franklin consensus report, the composition of each school based staff/parent committee did not generally reflect the staff/student populations. Sixty- nine percent of the committee members were black, which was not consistent with the school population, as per the report. RIGHTSELL The monitoring team from Rightsell did not respond to \"Committees\" section of the monitoring instrument. Response from Principal(s): None 5.0 EXTENDED DAY EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES At each school the monitors expected to find: Extended day activities (sports, clubs, etc.) generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender Adult sponsorships generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender Recruitment practices to promote participation of all races and both genders in extended day activities Parents had been provided with appropriate information relative to extended day activities/Saturday program Extended Day provided reinforcement of objectives of SEP Majority of students participated in extended day/ Saturday programDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 11 Identified activities were conducted by qualified teachers FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN Bulletins and newsletters were used to ensure that students were apprised of information regarding various opportunities to participate in extracurricular activities/extended educational programs, according to the report from Franklin. An area of concern noted by the monitor was that participation in extracurricular activities/extended educational programs did not generally reflect the school population. The notation was made that only four percent of the students participating in the aforementioned programs were white, even though the school had a ten percent white student enrollment. However, the report pointed out that most of the school's white students were in pre-kindergarten and kindergarten and were not eligible for many of the extracurricular activities. RIGHTSELL A majority of the monitors from Rightsell did not respond to this section of the monitoring checklist. Response from Principal(s): NoneDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 12 6.0 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT/ASSESSMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: All students' strengths and weaknesses assessed and their educational programs planned accordingly (SEP) Evidence that promotion/retention rates were monitored and analyzed to reduce disparities in achievement disaggregated by race/gender) Test results used for diagnostic and prescriptive purposes and reported in a manner that was clear and helpful to administrators, teachers, students, and parents Strategies to close the disparity in test scores among identifiable groups FINDINGS: Two areas of concern were noted regarding Student Achievement/Assessment at Franklin. The report indicated that when results from the 1992-93 Stanford Eight Test were compared to those of 1993-94, the scores of black students did not improve. Secondly, one hundred percent of the students who failed/retained were black. According to the monitoring report, goals and strategies were developed and implemented to decrease the achievement disparity between black students and white students. Examples cited: faculty at each grade level drafted a plan utilizing last year's test data, including incentives for test preparation. Additionally, test taking skills were taughtDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 13 throughout the year\nexamples cited\nuse of the series Te^ Best and Scoring Higher, according to the monitoring report. RIGHTSELL Monitors from Rightsell did not examine Stanford Eight Test results, nor did they report if the failure/retention rates reflected the school population. Goals and strategies were developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black students and white students on the Stanford Eight Achievement Test\nthe \"Great Expectations II program was cited as an example of a strategy employed. Additionally, monitors reported that test taking skills were taught throughout the year, citing teacher made tests and practice taking tests as examples. Responses from Principal(s): None 7.0 SPECIAL EDUCATION At each school the monitors expected to find: Clear, well-defined referral, assessment and placement procedures Special Education facilities that were comparable to other educational programs on the campus and integrated into the total school environment Adequate textbooks, materials, and equipment available for all students to participate in classroom learning experiencesDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 14 Strategies to decrease any over-representation of minorities Adequate facilities to meet the needs of the students served FINDINGS: FRANKLIN Special education facilities were comparable to those of the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, and met the needs of the students served. according to the report submitted. Current copies of student records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the individual learner. One area of concern regarding special education was noted by the monitor. It was reported that the teacher expressed frustration about miscommunication at the district level as to procedures for requesting materials, and that there was a lack of guidelines regarding said. RIGHTSELL The team from Rightsell reported that Special Education facilities were not comparable to those of the campus in general but met the needs of the students served. Monitors indicated that current copies of student records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress andDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 15 achievement of the individual learner. Response from Principal(s): None 8.0 GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION At each school the monitors expected to find: Students identified through teacher referral, standardized test results, academic performance, and other criteria deemed appropriate by the school staff Planned and organized strategies to address any problem of under-representation of identifiable groups in gifted and talented programs Sufficient textbooks, materials, and equipment available to deliver the curriculum to all students in the class Gifted and talented facilities that are comparable to facilities of other educational programs on the campus and integrated into the total school environment Adequate facilities to meet the needs of the students served FINDINGS: FRANKLIN At Franklin, the teacher of G/T classes reported that material and equipment were adequate to deliver the curriculum\nthe monitoring report indicated that more materials were available than would ever be needed, plus a small budget for additional acquisitions. The G/T facilities were comparable to those of the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, andDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 16 met the needs of the students served. According to the report submitted, the classroom was spacious, the materials plentiful. Current copies of students' records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the individual learner. The report indicated that student files were kept in a file drawer by the teacher's desk. RIGHTSELL No areas of concern relative to the G/T program were noted on the reports submitted. However, it was reported that a file cabinet that would lock would be useful to the G/T teacher. Strategies to eliminate disproportionate student assignment to G/T were evident, and the teacher understood the school's policy, as per the report. According to monitors, the facility for G/T was excellent, but small\nit was comparable to those of the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, and met the needs of the students served. Current copies of students' records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress of the individual learner.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 17 Response from Principal(s): None 9.0 STAFF DEVELOPMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Ongoing staff development programs designed to enable staff members to fulfill the district/school mission and purpose Staff development provided at a variety of places and times Appropriate inservice provided to enable each staff member to understand his/her role and responsibility in the implementation of the districtwide desegregation plan Documentation of staff development participation Inservice provided to all teachers relative to the delivery of the district curriculum Required staff development including: Cooperative Learning/Learning Styles Human Effectiveness Training Parent/Educator Communication and Human Relations Skills Mentor Teacher Program Special Staff Development for Principal, Assistant Principal FINDINGS: FRANKLIN The monitoring report from Franklin indicated two areas of concern: (1) No staff development activities related to discipline/classroom management were offered, and (2) Regular classroom teachers were not provided ongoing training inDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 18 understanding the remedial programs. The Franklin report further indicated that via an interview, the principal reported that staff development activities related to educational eguity to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population, e.g.. Cooperative Learning and PET, had been offered. However, the monitor stated that no documenting confirmation was available. The report also questioned if two staff development activities cited as evidence of offering activities in teaching strategies for multicultural curriculum delivery actually applied to the multicultural curriculum. The examples given were the \"Rites of Passage\" program inservice and a Spanish immersion inservice. RIGHTSELL No areas of concern were noted regarding the \"Staff Development\" section of the monitoring instrument. Examples of various staff development activities that had been offered included one on teaching with phonics, a parent/community involvement activity, and one on higher level thinking skills. The report also indicated that regular classroom teachers were provided on-going training in understanding the remedial program.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 19 Response from Principal(s): None 10.0 PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Documentation of school-home communication and contact Documented evidence showing how all identifiable groups of parents had been actively solicited When financially possible, transportation provided to school functions for parents who needed the service School functions conducted in community facilities near identifiable groups of parents School functions scheduled to accommodate all parent groups Provisions for regularly informing and involving parents regarding all aspects of their child's school performance Documentation that parents were actively involved in remediation programs in which their students participated (support workshop attendance, conferences, ASDP signatures, etc.) Opportunities to develop leadership skills among all parent groups Documentation of parental involvement in writing the school improvement plans FINDINGS: FRANKLIN No areas of concern concerning the \"Parental Involvement\" section of the monitoring instrument were noted at Franklin. The school utilized a variety of methods to encourage parentalDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 20 involvement in school and in home supported educational activities\nexamples cited: interim reports, parent conferences, and home visits. Additionally, documentation was available to indicate that parents were actively involved in each phase of remediation programs in which their child participated. Contact was also made regularly with the home to communicate positive/negative information related to student behavior and/or achievement. According to the report. home visits and phone calls were documented in teacher monitoring folders. All identifiable groups of parents were actively involved in school functions, as per the report. The monitor indicated that one notable undertaking was the Men's Club, which encouraged male participation. School patrons and parents were given an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local School Improvement Plan. The report indicated that parents served on committees related to the four COE target areas: Academic Growth, Time on Task, Parent Involvement, and Clear School Purpose. RIGHTSELL No areas of concern were noted regarding the \"Parental Involvement\" section of the monitoring instrument.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 21 The team from Rightsell indicated that the school utilized a variety of methods to encourage parental involvement in school and in home supported educational activities. Examples of the aforementioned methods cited: Happy Grams, home visits, meet and greet activities, phone calls, and parental visits to the school. All identifiable groups of parents were actively involved in school functions, and documentation was available to indicate that parents were actively involved in each phase of the remediation program in which their child participated. The team from Rightsell indicated that contact was made regularly with the home to communicate positive/negative information related to student behavior and/or achievement. Examples of such contact cited were: interim reports every three weeks, reports to parents, conferences, report cards. and newsletters. Mini-seminars at PTA meetings were held to make parents aware of district structure, policy and programs, and ways to access them. Additionally, monitors reported that this information was also distributed during Parent Involvement Day and at the Parent Center. The report also indicated that parents had an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local School Improvement Plan.DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 22 Response from Principal(s): None 11.0 STUDENT DISCIPLINE At each school the monitors expected to find: No disproportionality among identifiable groups of students when discipline sanctions were analyzed (-25%- +12.5% of the black student enrollment at the school) Evidence of strategies to eliminate disproportionality in disciplinary sanctions, if such disproportionality existed Teachers receiving staff development and training to become more effective in discipline management and classroom management Discipline program monitored, evaluated, and updated to decrease any disproportionality among identifiable groups of students Evidence that a handbook/policy clearly stated expectations for student conduct and that these policies were distributed and explained Classroom instruction proceeded without disruption Mentor Program Community based support program FINDINGS: FRANKLIN Information, including the staff's expectation for student conduct, regarding student disciplinary policies and procedures was distributed to all students and parents. The Franklin report noted that posters in the hallway informedDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 23 students about good behavior and that a behavior plan was sent home to parents, one which required signatures by the parents and to be returned to school for filing. The school staff had plans, procedures, and practices which were designed to enable students to remain in school. promote academic success and alleviate behavior problems. according to the submitted report. The principal wrote a multi-step discipline plan that involved several parent contacts before suspension or expulsion would occur, according to the report. An area of concern expressed by the monitor was that one hundred percent of the suspensions and expulsions for three quarters of the 1994-95 academic year were received by black males. However, strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups were in evidence. Classroom instruction proceeded in an orderly manner in classrooms observed. The monitor further noted that fair and firm methods in maintaining order were employed. The principal, assistant principal, teachers and supervision aides were observed as being quite active in directing/controlling students. The report from Franklin indicated that many classes were observed passing through theDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 24 hallways and that it was very pleasing to see the principal monitoring their movement. It was further shared that \"...miraculously, no paint was smeared!\" RIGHTSELL No areas of concern were noted concerning the \"School Discipline\" portion of the monitoring instrument. Although no examples were cited in the report, monitors indicated that information, including the staff's expectation for student conduct, regarding student disciplinary policies and procedures was distributed to all students and parents. Study hall, in-school suspension, and teachers' monitoring students during recess, as needed, were given as examples of the school staff having plans, procedures, and practices which were designed to enable students to remain in school, promote academic success and alleviate behavior problems. Strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups were evident. No information was given concerning if suspension and expulsion rates were generally representative of the student population. Classroom instruction proceeded in an orderly manner in all classrooms observed, according to the reports submitted. School personnel were observed as being very active inDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 25 directing/controlling students. Response by Principal(s): None 12.0 BUILDING LEADERSHIP/MANAGEMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Clear, concise and well-written improvement goals for equity Physical environment which supported the goals of quality teaching and learning, i.e., clean buildings, no debris, orderly halls, no graffiti Equipment and learning aids in good condition, i.e., bulletin boards, chalk boards Evidence that the principal monitored the curriculum Evidence which indicated that all students were served by the guidance program, i.e., counselors' schedules/daily logsindividual/group counseling A system to receive information from former students and patrons regarding the quality/needs of the total program A safe and secure campus for all students, employees, and visitors Evidence that counselors assisted parents in obtaining services from outside agencies, i.e. counselor's daily log Friendly and helpful personnel Strategies to increase the number of minority students in upper-level courses/class groups District and school security guidelines being followedDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 26 FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN No areas of concern regarding \"Building Leadership/Management\" were noted on the monitoring report from Franklin. The school had a clear, concise, well-written statement of specific improvement goals. Additionally, the campus and building were clean and free of graffiti, and student passage in the hallways was orderly. The monitoring report submitted for Franklin School indicated that curriculum monitoring was conducted by the principal. Teachers documented objectives in their plan books, and the principal frequently visited classrooms. The guidance program provided equitable services to all students, according to the monitoring report. In addition to the services offered by the counselors, a social worker worked with parents and students on both individual and group bases. District and school security guidelines were followed, as per the report. A new enhancement during the 1994-95 academic year was the procurement of walkie-talkies. RIGHTSELL The monitoring team at Rightsell reported that the school had a clear, concise, well-written statement of specificDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 27 improvement goals, although the team cited no examples of these goals. Hallways were orderly on the day of the monitoring visit, according to the submitted reports. Curriculum monitoring occurred, and the guidance program provided equitable services to all students. The reports indicated that district and school security guidelines were being followed with the following reservation\na fence had been knocked down and not repaired, thus security was somewhat less than optimal. Monitors noted an area of concern regarding the campus and building being clean and free of debris and graffiti. The report indicated that the general interior of the building was very good, but that restrooms and the campus needed attention. A further notation indicated that occasionally there were mice and roaches present in the building. Responses from Principal(s): NoneLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SEP 2 0 1995 Office cf Desegregaacn DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT ON INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Little Rock, Arkansas July 1995 I 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1.0 Equitable Placement by Race/Gender in School Programs 3 2.0 q 3.0 Curriculum 4 q 4.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Committees Awards 8 9 5.0 q 6.0 7.0 Extended Day Educational Opportunities Student Achievement/Assessment Special Education 10 12 q 13 8.0 9.0 q 10.0 q 11.0 12.0 Gifted and Talented Education Staff Development Parental Involvement Student Discipline Building Leadership/Management 15 17 19 22 25 q q q q q q qLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT The Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan mandates that \"the incentive schools will be monitored at least once each n K quarter by members of the districtwide biracial committee (page 224).\" The monitoring instrument and Standard Operating Procedures for Monitoring are provided to principals prior to the visits with instructions for these instruments to be shared with their school staffs. The visits are scheduled cooperatively with each principal. q The Desegregation Plan further directs that \"quarterly reports summarizing all the monitoring visits will be prepared by personnel from the Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department and presented through the superintendent to the Board of Directors of n the LRSD during a regular meeting (page 225).\" n Progress or lack of progress is reported concerning the following areas: q q q q Separation of Races in School Programs Curriculum School/District Initiated Honors/Awards Committees Extracurricular Activities Student Achievement/Assessment Special Education Gifted and Talented Education Staff Development Parental Involvement Student Discipline Building Leadership/Management qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT 1994-95 INCENTIVE SCHOOLS FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 2 Each team reviews a school profile which contains basic information related to current conditions in the monitored areas. The school profile information is verified through the school visit and interviews with school personnel. This report provides a summary of visits conducted May 2, 1995 and May 25, 1995. The school reports identify conditions that were evident on the day of the visit. Many acceptable conditions were observed by the monitors during the visits. However, the intent of this report is to identify the degree to which each school is progressing toward the goals of desegregation (See LRSD Desegregation Plan pages 28-29). At the conclusion of each visit, a conference is held with the building principal or designee to I n review the findings of the team. Upon completion of the process described above, reports from the incentive school monitoring teams are forwarded to the LRSD Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. The Desegregation Plan states that \"the associate superintendent for desegregation will be II m responsible for insuring that deficiencies listed in the monitoring reports are eliminated in a timely manner (page 225).\" During the 1994-95 academic year, only two incentive schools. Rightsell and Franklin, were monitored by members of the n Districtwide Biracial Committee. A three member team monitored Rightsell on May 2, 1995\nhowever, the team did not submit a HI IDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT q q q q q q q q q q q q INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 3 consensus report. Therefore, the writer of this sununary report prepared the consensus report for Rightsell. Franklin was monitored on May 25, 1995 by one Districtwide Biracial Committee member\nthus, the consensus report for that school represents the views of only one person. 1.0 EQUITABLE PLACEMENT BY RACE/GENDER IN SCHOOL PROGRAMS At each school the monitors expected to find: Racially balanced (at least 25 % black) certified and (at least 25 % white) non-certified staff reflecting appropriate percentage Racial/Gender Balance (at least 25 % black) in staff assignments, programs, content areas, and grade level Strategies to increase the enrollment of white students FINDINGS: FRANKLIN According to the report submitted, the composition of the school staff ensured that students had access to, and contact with, a varied staff of certified and non-certified personnel. Furthermore, the report indicated that class enrollments generally reflected the racial/ethnic composition of the school. It was noted that because there were so few white students, the principal, to the degree possible, usually placed those students in the same classroom so as not to place them in racial isolation. As a result, there were several q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 4 Classes with an enrollment of only black students, as per the report. An area of concern indicated by the report was that the school enrollment did not reflect the racial/ethnic q composition prescribed by the court approved desegregation plan. According to the report, ninety percent of the students q were black. RIGHTSELL q The team from Rightsell noted that the composition of the q school staff was an area of concern because the racial composition of the staff did not ensure that students had access to, and contact with, a varied staff of certified and non-certified personnel. In total, 79% of the staff was q black, with a non-certified staff that was only five percent white and a certified staff of 64% black personnel. The reports indicated that a number of classes consisted q solely of black students. Response from Principal(s): q None 2.0 CURRICULUM q At each school the monitors expected to find\nq Interaction among students promoted by classroom seating patterns q An adequacy of materials and equipment to support the qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 5 prescribed curriculum (Adequacy - can you implement the curriculum with what you have?) q Varied teaching strategies reflected by display of student work Evidence of assessment/reteaching/retesting, when necessary Current and complete documentation of student progress q Teachers demonstrating use of multiculturally infused curriculum (guides) q q Students participating in heterogeneous (mixed) groups to allow for cross racial/gender interaction, to the degree population permits Displays of bulletin boards, materials, and publications that reflect the cultural diversity of the student population and/or multiculturalism q Peer tutoring/Cooperative Learning Group q Evidence of hands-on discovery and exploratory approaches to teaching: q - use of science lab - display of project - use of math manipulatives q FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN q No areas of concern relative to the \"Curriculum area of q the monitoring instrument were reported for Franklin School. q A majority of the teachers interviewed indicated that they had adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. However, the monitor reported that one teacher M expressed the need for more materials but had not reguestedI 4 DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 6 any because she/he felt discouraged from doing so. According to the report submitted, student folders and other appropriate records were either on file or in view in each classroom monitored. All students were actively involved in classroom instruction in all classrooms visited\nexamples I of student activities cited: group discussions and independent I student work. It was impossible to document displays and bulletin boards of multiculturalism throughout the building because most of them had been removed in order to facilitate painting. 14 However, the report indicated that selected classrooms had a variety of displays and print materials featuring African, Asian, Native Americans, and European cultures. Displays of 4 14 student work were quite evident in the classrooms for the lower grade students\nbecause of the painting in progress at the school, student work had been removed from the upper grade 14 classrooms. 4 The report indicated that not enough evidence was available to determine if the multicultural objectives of the 14 curriculum guide were being taught. The fouryear old classes had completed a comprehensive unit on Germany, Hawaii, Japan, and Mexico, but several teachers at other grade levels were unable to provide any specific information about multicultural\"I 5 DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT 1 H M I 1 4 I ) 2 INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 7 study other than African of African-American cultures, according to the monitor. It was reported that acquisitions to the library media center were driven by the school curriculum and recommendations in professional journals. RIGHTSELL A majority of the reports submitted by monitors at Rightsell indicated that bulletin boards, displays of projects, etc., reflecting the racial/ethnic/gender differences of the student body and/or multiculturalism were in evidence. Examples cited\n\"Greetings from Around the World,\" information about Egypt and Norway\ndisplays of famous black Americans, and pictures of famous white Americans. Multiculturalism was also depicted in a majority of the classrooms visited. Monitors further indicated that student work was on display. Teachers of all classrooms visited indicated that they had adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum, according to reports submitted. Monitors also noted that current and complete student records were maintained in the classroom and school office to monitor the progress in achievement of the individual learner. I 4 Ir 1 DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 8 Monitors further indicated that all students were actively involved in classroom instruction in each classroom visited\nexamples of instructional activities cited: group instruction and teacher directed instruction. Add itionally. classroom seating patterns promoted interaction among students of different races/genders, as per reports. II In a majority of the classrooms monitored, multicultural objectives of the curriculum guides were taught via the use of hands-on art, newspapers, visual aids, etc. Response from Principal(s): None 3.0 SCHOOL/DISTRICT INITIATED HONORS AND AWARDS At each school the monitors expected to find: A variety of awards and honors Evidence of written procedures and requirements governing honors and awards have been distributed to staff, students and parents A process to evaluate the honors and awards program for equity Plans to eliminate any racial/gender inequities relative to distribution of honors and awards FINDINGS: FRANKLIN The report from Franklin indicated that a variety of honors and awards was provided in areas such as scholarship. K H K n K R ! 1DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 9 citizenship, sports, clubs, and attendance. Written procedures and requirements governing honors and awards were distributed to staff, students, and parents, according to the monitor. Distribution methods cited: Bulletins were sent home at the beginning of the year, and newsletters and bulletins were sent home periodically. The offerings and procedures regarding honors and awards were evaluated regularly for equity and to determine if new n awards were necessary to meet student needs, as per the q report. The distribution of honors and awards generally reflected q the school population, with 90% of the citations received by black students. q RIGHTSELL The team from Rightsell did not monitor the area of q \"School/District Initiated Honors and Awards.\" q Response from Principal(s): None q 4.0 COMMITTEES At each school the monitors expected to find: q q Racial/gender composition of appointed school-based committees (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) generally reflects the school population q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 10 FINDINGS: FRANKLIN According to the Franklin consensus report, the DI composition of each school based staff/parent committee did DI not generally reflect the staff/student populations. Sixty- nine percent of the committee members were black, which was DI not consistent with the school population, as per the report. RIGHTSELL II The monitoring team from Rightsell did not respond to Il \"Committees\" section of the monitoring instrument. Response from Principal(s): II None 5.0 EXTENDED DAY EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES ID At each school the monitors expected to find: IM Extended day activities (sports, clubs, etc.) generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender IM Adult sponsorships generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender IM Recruitment practices to promote participation of all races and both genders in extended day activities IM Parents had been provided with appropriate information relative to extended day activities/Saturday program IM Extended Day provided reinforcement of objectives of SEP Majority of students participated in extended day/ Saturday program IM IMDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 10 FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN According to the Franklin consensus report, the q composition of each school based staff/parent committee did not generally reflect the staff/student populations. Sixty- q nine percent of the committee members were black, which was q not consistent with the school population, as per the report. RIGHTSELL q The monitoring team from Rightsell did not respond to \"Committees\" section of the monitoring instrument. q Response from Principal(s): q None 5.0 EXTENDED DAY EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES q At each school the monitors expected to find: q Extended day activities (sports, clubs, etc.) generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender q Adult sponsorships generally balanced (-25% to +12.5% of black student enrollment) by race and gender q Recruitment practices to promote participation of all races and both genders in extended day activities q Parents had been provided with appropriate information relative to extended day activities/Saturday program q Extended Day provided reinforcement of objectives of SEP Majority of students participated in extended day/ Saturday program q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 11 Identified activities were conducted by qualified teachers FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN q Bulletins and newsletters were used to ensure that q students were apprised of information regarding various opportunities to participate in extracurricular q activities/extended educational programs, according to the report from Franklin. q An area of concern noted by the monitor was that q participation in extracurricular activities/extended educational programs did not generally reflect the school q population. The notation was made that only four percent of the students participating in the aforementioned programs were q white, even though the school had a ten percent white student q enrollment. However, the report pointed out that most of the school's white students were in pre-kindergarten and q kindergarten and were not eligible for many of the extracurricular activities. q RIGHTSELL q A majority of the monitors from Rightsell did not respond to this section of the monitoring checklist. q Response from Principal(s): None qp DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 12 6.0 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT/ASSESSMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: HI All students' strengths and weaknesses assessed and their educational programs planned accordingly (SEP) Evidence that promotion/retention rates were monitored and analyzed to reduce disparities in achievement disaggregated by race/gender) Test results used for diagnostic and prescriptive purposes and reported in a manner that was clear and helpful to administrators, teachers, students, and parents Strategies to close the disparity in test scores among identifiable groups FINDINGS: Two areas of concern were noted regarding Student Achievement/Assessment at Franklin. The report indicated that when results from the 1992-93 Stanford Eight Test were compared to those of 1993-94, the scores of black students did not improve. Secondly, one hundred percent of the students who failed/retained were black. According to the monitoring report, goals and strategies were developed and implemented to decrease the achievement disparity between black students and white students. Examples cited: faculty at each grade level drafted a plan utilizing last year's test data, including incentives for test preparation. Additionally, test taking skills were taught q q q q q q q q Hp DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 13 throughout the year\nexamples cited: use of the series Te^ Best and Scoring Higher, according to the monitoring report. RIGHTSELL q Monitors from Rightsell did not examine Stanford Eight Test results, nor did they report if the failure/retention q rates reflected the school population. q Goals and strategies were developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black students q and white students on the Stanford Eight Achievement Test\nthe \"Great Expectations\" program was cited as an example of a q strategy employed. Additionally, monitors reported that test q taking skills were taught throughout the year, citing teacher made tests and practice taking tests as examples. q Responses from Principal(s): None q *  7.0 SPECIAL EDUCATION At each school the monitors expected to find: Clear, well-defined referral, assessment and placement procedures Special Education facilities that were comparable to other educational programs on the campus and integrated into the total school environment M * Adequate textbooks, materials, and equipment available for all students to participate in classroom learning experiences EDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 14 Strategies to decrease any over-representation of minorities Adequate facilities to meet the needs of the students served FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN Special education facilities were comparable to those of m the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, and met the needs of the students served. according to the report submitted. Current copies of student records were maintained in the II classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the il individual learner. One area of concern regarding special education was noted H H by the monitor. It was reported that the teacher expressed frustration about miscommunication at the district level as to procedures for requesting materials, and that there was a lack II of guidelines regarding said. RIGHTSELL M The team from Rightsell reported that Special Education  facilities were not comparable to those of the campus in general but met the needs of the students served. Monitors indicated that current copies of student records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress and I 4DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 15 achievement of the individual learner. Response from Principal(s): q 8.0 None GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION q At each school the monitors expected to find: q Students identified through teacher referral, standardized test results, academic performance, and other criteria deemed appropriate by the school staff q Planned and organized strategies to address any problem of under-representation of identifiable groups in gifted and talented programs q Sufficient textbooks, materials, and equipment available to deliver the curriculum to all students in the class q Gifted and talented facilities that are comparable to facilities of other educational programs on the campus and integrated into the total school environment q Adequate facilities to meet the needs of the students served q FINDINGS: FRANKLIN q At Franklin, the teacher of G/T classes reported that material and equipment were adequate to deliver the q curriculum\nthe monitoring report indicated that more q materials were available than would ever be needed, plus a small budget for additional acquisitions. q The G/T facilities were comparable to those of the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, and q qI DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 I FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 16 I met the needs of the students served. According to the report submitted, the classroom was spacious, the materials plentiful. I Current copies of students' records were maintained in I the classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the individual learner. The report indicated that student files I were kept in a file drawer by the teacher's desk. RIGHTSELL I No areas of concern relative to the G/T program were I noted on the reports submitted. However, it was reported that a file cabinet that would lock would be useful to the G/T I teacher. Strategies to eliminate disproportionate student I assignment to G/T were evident, and the teacher understood the school's policy, as per the report. According to monitors, the facility for G/T was excellent, but small\nit was comparable to those of the campus in general, integrated into the total school environment, and I met the needs of the students served. I Current copies of students' records were maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress of the individual 4 learner. I aDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 17 Response from Principal(s): None 9.0 STAFF DEVELOPMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Ongoing staff development programs designed to enable staff members to fulfill the district/school mission and purpose Staff development provided at a variety of places and times Appropriate inservice provided to enable each staff member to understand his/her role and responsibility in the implementation of the districtwide desegregation plan Documentation of staff development participation Inservice provided to all teachers relative to the delivery of the district curriculum Required staff development including: HI Cooperative Learning/Learning Styles Human Effectiveness Training Parent/Educator Communication and Human Relations Skills Mentor Teacher Program Special Staff Development for Principal, Assistant Principal FINDINGS: H FRANKLIN The monitoring report from Franklin indicated two areas of concern: (1) No staff development activities related to 4 discipline/classroom management were offered, and (2) Regular classroom teachers were not provided ongoing training in R 1DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT q q q q q q q INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 18 understanding the remedial programs. The Franklin report further indicated that via an interview, the principal reported that staff development activities related to educational equity to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population, e.g.. Cooperative Learning and PET, had been offered. However, the monitor stated that no documenting confirmation was available. The report also questioned if two staff development activities cited as evidence of offering activities in teaching strategies for multicultural curriculum delivery actually applied to the multicultural curriculum. The examples given were the \"Rites of Passage\" program inservice and a Spanish immersion inservice. RIGHTSELL No areas of concern were noted regarding the \"Staff Development\" section of the monitoring instrument. Examples of various staff development activities that had been offered included one on teaching with phonics, a parent/community involvement activity, and one on higher level thinking skills. The report also indicated that regular classroom teachers were provided on-going training in understanding the remedial program. q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 19 Response from Principal(s): None 10.0 PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Documentation of school-home communication and contact Documented evidence showing how all identifiable groups of parents had been actively solicited When financially possible, transportation provided to school functions for parents who needed the service 1 School functions conducted in community facilities near identifiable groups of parents School functions scheduled to accommodate all parent groups Provisions for regularly informing and involving parents regarding all aspects of their child's school performance HI Documentation that parents were actively involved in remediation programs in which their students participated (support workshop attendance, conferences, ASDP signatures, etc.) Opportunities to develop leadership skills among all parent groups Documentation of parental involvement in writing the school improvement plans FINDINGS: 4 FRANKLIN No areas of concern concerning the \"Parental Involvement\" Bl section of the monitoring instrument were noted at Franklin. The school utilized a variety of methods to encourage parentalI DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 20 involvement in school and in home supported educational activities\nexamples cited: interim reports, parent conferences, and home visits. Additionally, documentation was available to indicate that parents were actively involved in each phase of remediation programs in which their child participated. Contact was also made regularly with the home to communicate positive/negative information related to student behavior and/or achievement. According to the report. home visits and phone calls were documented in teacher monitoring folders. All identifiable groups of parents were actively involved in school functions, as per the report. The monitor indicated that one notable undertaking was the Men's Club, which encouraged male participation. School patrons and parents were given an opportunity to HI actively participate in developing the local School n q Improvement Plan. The report indicated that parents served on committees related to the four COE target areas: Academic q Growth, Time on Task, Parent Involvement, and Clear School Purpose. q RIGHTSELL q No areas of concern were noted regarding the \"Parental Involvement\" section of the monitoring instrument. q q kuDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 21 The team from Rightsell indicated that the school utilized a variety of methods to encourage parental involvement in school and in home supported educational \u0026gt;4 activities. Examples of the aforementioned methods cited: I Happy Grams, home visits, meet and greet activities, phone calls, and parental visits to the school. All identifiable groups of parents were actively involved in school functions, and documentation was available to indicate that parents were actively involved in each phase of the remediation program in which their child participated. The team from Rightsell indicated that contact was made regularly with the home to communicate positive/negative information related to student behavior and/or achievement. Examples of such contact cited were: interim reports every three weeks, reports to parents, conferences, report cards, and newsletters. 1 Mini-seminars at PTA meetings were held to make parents aware of district structure, policy and programs, and ways to access them. Additionally, monitors reported that this information was also distributed during Parent Involvement Day and at the Parent Center. The report also indicated that parents had an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local School Improvement Plan. q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 22 Response from Principal(s)\nNone 11.0 STUDENT DISCIPLINE At each school the monitors expected to find: No disproportionality among identifiable groups of students when discipline sanctions were analyzed (-25%- +12.5% of the black student enrollment at the school) Evidence of strategies to eliminate disproportionality in disciplinary sanctions, if such disproportionality existed Teachers receiving staff development and training to become more effective in discipline management and classroom management q Discipline program monitored, evaluated, and updated to decrease any disproportionality among identifiable groups of students q Evidence that a handbook/policy clearly stated expectations for student conduct and that these policies were distributed and explained q Classroom instruction proceeded without disruption Mentor Program q Community based support program FINDINGS: q FRANKLIN q Information, including the staff's expectation for student conduct, regarding student disciplinary policies and q procedures was distributed to all students and parents. The * Franklin report noted that posters in the hallway informed5 DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 23 students about good behavior and that a behavior plan was sent home to parents, one which required signatures by the parents and to be returned to school for filing. R The school staff had plans, procedures, and practices which were designed to enable students to remain in school. promote academic success and alleviate behavior problems, q according to the submitted report. The principal wrote a q multi-step discipline plan that involved several parent q contacts before suspension or expulsion would occur, according to the report. An area of concern expressed by the monitor was that one 5 hundred percent of the suspensions and expulsions for three quarters of the 1994-95 academic year were received by black males. However, strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups were in evidence. Classroom instruction proceeded in an orderly manner in classrooms observed. The monitor further noted that fair and firm methods in maintaining order were employed. The principal, assistant principal, teachers and supervision aides were observed as being quite active in directing/controlling students. The report from Franklin indicated that many classes were observed passing through the I Jr DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 24 hallways and that it was very pleasing to see the principal monitoring their movement. It was further shared that \"...miraculously, no paint was smeared!\" RIGHTSELL No areas of concern were noted concerning the \"School Discipline\" portion of the monitoring instrument. q __l Although no examples were cited in the report, monitors indicated that information, including the staff's expectation for student conduct, regarding student disciplinary policies and procedures was distributed to all students and parents. study hall, in-school suspension, and teachers' monitoring students during recess, as needed, were given as examples of the school staff having plans, procedures, and practices which were designed to enable students to remain in school, promote academic success and alleviate behavior problems. Strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups were evident. No information was given concerning if suspension and expulsion rates were generally representative of the student population. Classroom instruction proceeded in an orderly manner in all classrooms observed, according to the reports submitted. .1 School personnel were observed as being very active in q 1 IR q qq qqq q qq DISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 25 directing/controlling students. Response by Principal(s): None 12.0 BUILDING LEADERSHIP/MANAGEMENT At each school the monitors expected to find: Clear, concise and well-written improvement goals for equity Physical environment which supported the goals of quality teaching and learning, i.e., clean buildings, no debris, orderly halls, no graffiti Equipment and learning aids in good condition, i.e., bulletin boards, chalk boards Evidence that the principal monitored the curriculum Evidence which indicated that all students were served by the guidance program, i.e., counselors' schedules/daily logsindividual/group counseling 4 A system to receive information from former students and patrons regarding the quality/needs of the total program 14 A safe and secure campus for all students, employees, and visitors 4 Evidence that counselors assisted parents in obtaining services from outside agencies, i.e. counselor's daily log 14 Friendly and helpful personnel 4 Strategies to increase the number of minority students in upper-level courses/class groups District and school security guidelines being followed 14 mDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT 1994-95 INCENTIVE SCHOOLS FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 26 FINDINGS\nFRANKLIN No areas of concern regarding \"Building 1 Leadership/Management\" were noted on the monitoring report 4 from Franklin. The school had a clear, concise, well-written statement of specific improvement goals. Additionally, the campus and building were clean and free of graffiti, and student passage in the hallways was orderly. I The monitoring report submitted for Franklin School indicated that curriculum monitoring was conducted by the principal. Teachers documented objectives in their plan books, and the principal frequently visited classrooms. \u0026gt;1 The guidance program provided equitable services to all students, according to the monitoring report. In addition to i the services offered by the counselors, a social worker worked with parents and students on both individual and group bases. District and school security guidelines were followed. as I per the report. A new enhancement during the 1994-95 academic year was the procurement of walkie-talkies. q RIGHTSELL q The monitoring team at Rightsell reported that the school had a clear, concise, well-written statement of specific q qDISTRICTWIDE BIRACIAL COMMITTEE MONITORING REPORT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1994-95 FOURTH QUARTER SUMMARY REPORT Page 27 improvement goals, although the team cited no examples of these goals. Hallways were orderly on the day of the monitoring visit, RI according to the submitted reports. Curriculum monitoring occurred, and the guidance program provided equitable services to all students. The reports indicated that district and school security guidelines were being followed with the following reservation\na fence had been knocked down and not repaired, thus security was somewhat less than optimal. 1 Monitors noted an area of concern regarding the campus 1 and building being clean and free of debris and graffiti. The report indicated that the general interior of the building was I very good, but that restrooms and the campus needed attention. A further notation indicated that occasionally there were mice i and roaches present in the building. Responses from Principal(s): None i 4 4 4\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1113","title":"Little Rock School District Fast Tract Evaluations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Economic aspects","Educational statistics","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Fast Tract Evaluations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1113"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nn I t n r i. R LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT n. ' n m I r 'i. ' r 1 l FAST TRACK EVALUATIONS ., I I t 1. . ., I I i. I - i' ~i _ .. il  j  .,. i 2 i il P' I ,1 '- .. January 1994 . ... .,. .. .. APR 5 1994 OfficG cl Desegregation iJ1on,.onng LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FAST TRACK EVALUATIONS January 1994 SECTION NUMBER One Two Three Four Five Six Seven ADDENDUM TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE FAST TRACK EVALUATIONS Academic Progress Incentive Grant Library/Media Recruitment (Student) Stephens Special Education Substitute Teachers / 't Vocational Education Memorandum of September 7, 1993 (Revised 09-13-93) Procedures to be Used for Fast Track Evaluation of Desegregation Plan FAST TRACK EVALUATION SECTION ONE ACADEMIC PROGRESS INCENTIVE GRANT January 1994 Purpose ACADEMIC PROGRESS INCENTIVE GRANT (APIG) PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description The purpose of the APIG was to provide funding beyond the regular budget to all area schools in assisting them to increase academic achievement and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Principals and their committees were to submit a proposal and budget sheet in requesting the grant. Scope and Content The APIG described in the Desegregation Plan was first made available to each area school principal in the 1990-91 school year in the sum of $25,000. In the following two years, additional sums were made available - $25,000 in 1991-92 and $10,000 in 1992-93. The process to be followed was for each school principal and school committee to write a proposal. A budget sheet identifying items and cost as related to the proposal being submitted was to be attached. The plan utilizing the grant money was to be directly connected to and supportive of the school's annual school plan. The school plan was developed cooperatively by the principal and staff with parent committee input yearly. The parents signed the annual school plan document when completed indicating their approval and support for the school's program. Each grant proposal was forwarded to the APIG Committee for review. Upon approval, the budget sheet from the proposal was forwarded to the Financial Services Department and budget codes were then set up for the individual school to use for the purchasing of items requested in the proposal. Items requested by the school were typed on requisitions and forwarded to the assistant superintendent who supervised the particular area school. The APIG was then checked to make sure that the requisitions supported the goals of the APIG program: to improve the education of all students and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Participants/Beneficiaries The APIG was offered to all principals in the area schools. Upon receiving the approval of their proposals, the principals, staffs, and parent committees could plan enrichment activities designed to provide concrete experiences that would reinforce and enrich the students' concepts and total academic development. After-school tutoring programs and Saturday School were scheduled for students 2 who were functioning significantly below the 50th percentile on standardized tests and who required additional time to learn the core curriculum. These activities were designed to address the low self-esteem of many students in the strong belief that improvement in this area increases children's confidence in their own abilities to learn and therefore increase their motivation and persistence to learn. Program Goal The purpose of the APIG was to provide additional funds to the principals of the LRSD area schools who submitted proposals indicating plans: 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. 2. To reduce disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. The APIG was to be offered to the principals of the area schools each year for a period of three years ( 1990-93) . At the conclusion of that time period, a three-year summary would be submitted (Desegregation Plan, page 82) in order to evaluate its continuance. The two goals of the APIG along with specific objectives to have been accomplished to assist in the implementation of these goals are as follows: Objective One: To increase the academic achievement for identified students in the core curricula areas by providing teachers with a broad base of resources and equipment. Objective Two: To provide varied enrichment activities that would broaden identified students' experience base. Objective Three: To involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for identified students' growth and success. Objective Four: To provide staff development activities which meet the specific needs of identified students. I I I I I I I I I l I Evaluation Criteria The summary report of the APIG has been evaluated by test data analysis from the years 1990-93, specifically the evaluation will consist of: 1. A broad base of resources and equipment was provided for teachers to increase the academic achievement for all identified students in the core curriculum areas. 2. Enrichment activities were provided to identified students to broaden their experience base. 3. Parents were involved as full partners with school staff in working together to increase academic achievement and in reducing the disparity of identified students. 4. Staff development was provided to raise staff awareness/expectations of identified students. Evaluation Results Evaluation results reflect information received from the area schools. This information has been compiled and yields the following results, presented in correspondence with each previously stated objective. Objective One: Enhance classroom teachers teaching by providing supplies in order to ensure a broad base of resources in area schools for all identified students in the core curricula areas. Discussion During the APIG period, many resources and supplies were purchased in an effort to increase student achievement and to reduce disparities. Academic achievement as reflected on standardized and minimum performance tests indicates that during the 1990-91 school year, of 3 4 Objective One (cont.): the 22 schools reporting, 14 had increased MPT and MAT6 scores in grades 3 and 6. Eight schools showed increased student achievement on the MAT6. During the 1991-92 school year, of the 24 schools reporting, 19 had increases in 3rd grade MPT scores and 15 reported an increase in 6th grade MPT scores. Eleven schools reported increased achievement on Stanford 8. During the 1992-93 school year, of the 25 schools reporting, 17 had an increase on the 3rd grade MPT and 15 reported an increase in 6th grade achievement on the MPT. Thirteen schools reported increased achievement on Stanford 8. Academic Achievement as Reflected on Standardized Tests 1990 - 1993 Year i of Elementa\ni\n:y Area i of Schools ReRorting an Schools ReRorting Increase in Achievement of Taraeted students MPT MPT Gr. 3 Gr.6 MAT6 Stanf.8 1990-91 22 14 14 8 N/A 1991-92 24 19 15 N/A 11 1992-93 25 17 15 N/A 13 I I 5 Objective One (cont.): An inventory list of resources and purchases acquired by the schools to supplement teachers' supplies in order to ensure a broad base of resources in area schools is as follows: Musical materials and records Physical and earth science charts Multiethnic materials Dictionaries of cultural literacy Storytelling: literature puppets Write-to-Read materials Science lab materials Math manipulatives Class sets of literature Materials for Saturday School (targeted students) Materials for Extended Day Program - reading, math, phonics Scholastic Listening Skills Kits Test Best materials Art materials and supplies Duplicating paper for writing centers Self-esteem incentives Tape recorders Multiple headphone listening center Computers and software Cassette stereo systems 35mm camera for students to record and write Overhead projectors Microscopes Write-to-Read computers Automated Media Center Walkie Talkies (for safety) Science and social studies weekly magazines Scoring High materials Reading Centers for comprehensive learning Laminating paper for completed projects and contests 6 Objective Two: To provide varied enrichment activities that w0uld broaden identified students' experience base. Enrichment activities which supported and extended the LRSD area schools core curriculum are: Field trips relating to curriculum objectives, bus transportation for the trips Water Works Building Incentives for good citizenship, achievement, improvement Storytelling festivals Arkansas Museum of Science and History boxes Multicultural festivals Test Buster Program Jr. Great Books Quiz Bowls (required purchases of trophies, transparencies, and a contestant bell) Science Fair Geo Safari Centers for classrooms Children's Theater Ballet Arkansas Arkansas State Fair Robinson Auditorium Quarterly awards assemblies with community speakers Wildwood Park for Performing Arts Math Olympiad Mentors from the business community Old State House Campaign Headquarters Arkansas Arts Center - children's plays UALR Planetarium Arkansas Museum of Science and History Pumpkin Patch (all Pre-Kand Grade 1) - Hidden Valley Berry Farm Birthday recognitions Discussion  Arkansas Tol tee Mounds  career awareness School picnics  Municipal Court and Police Station Pinnacle Mountain State Park National Reading Incentive Program Spelling Bee Contest DEEP (Development Economic Educational Program - State Department) Little Rock Zoo Little Rock Airport State Capitol Birthday recognitions Christmas tree farm The above purchases that were funded through the APIG provided a broad experience base for all identified students in the area schools. Thirty-eight different kinds of enrichment activities were made available to broaden the identified students experience base. Objective Three: To involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for identified students' growth and success. 7 The area schools reported parent participation as a result of the APIG. A list of the programs that were made available to the parents in order to involve them as full partner in the planning for the growth and success of their children are as follows: Parents attended workshops. - Counselors presented inservice programs, \"Helping Parents Help Their Kids\" - Wellness Clinic inservice - STEP Program (parenting classes) - Make and Take Workshops Parents used materials which were provided through APIG funding at home with their children. - Video kits for parents to check out showing teachers reading books to students. The teacher on the video read the story while modeling appropriate comprehension questions. Kits were packaged in \"Spend the night bags\" to enable students and parents to use them overnight. - Parent Resource Banks - materials available for parents to check out to help their children - Holiday Homework Packages - made by parents for their children - Parents actively participated in after-school tutorial programs and were offered weekly incentives and culminating awards. Discussion Throughout the 1990-1993 grant period, parents have been involved in developing the area schools' annual school plans. The APIG applications resulted from those cooperatively developed school Objective Three (cont.): plans. In some schools, parental involvement, biracial committees, and Chapter 1 PACs were enhanced by discussions to pl-an and monitor the APIG. In addition to the obvious educational benefits, field trips involved significant numbers of parents in the area schools. Parents made arrangements to leave work in order to ac~ompany their children on field trips. Staffs were delighted to have so many parents participating in the education of their children. Fathers as well as mothers made arrangements to be with their children. Increased parental involvement was a direct result of taking educational trips. Objective Four: 8 To provide staff development activities which meet specific needs of identified students. Targeted staff development activities which were provided by the schools in order to assist in the increase of academic achievement and the reduction of disparity are as follows: TESA - Teacher Expectations-Student Achievement Math Manipulatives w.s. Cooperative Learning Centers to enhance the multiethnic curriculum in math, science, social studies, and language arts Master Teacher Gang Awareness Drug Awareness Whole Group Instruction and Classroom Management Discussion The elementary area schools funded a variety of workshops and purchased published staff development materials for their staff, which were designed to improve student achievement, growth, and the reduction of disparity in identified students. Obstacles to Goal Attainment The obstacles encountered are indicated below by specific objectives: Objective One: To increase and enhance academic achievement for all students. 9 Progress was made toward meeting this objective. The assessment of summation data gathered from the AMPT and standardized test scores revealed that some of the students who were targeted for special instruction did pass the MPT and made test gains on the standardized tests. While funds were expended for materials, equipment, staff development, tutoring programs, Saturday School, and parent support inservices in the three years of the grant program, there is still a need for more detailed and specific planning if resources are to support student achievement and progress. Objective TWo: To reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Even though schools reported positive observations emphasizing strong team planning, fewer student referrals to the principal, and better student attendance as it relates to reducing disparities, a more appropriate assessment of data and record keeping is recommended if schools are to track the reduction of disparity among students of racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Other Obstacles Impeding the APIG  Delays in approval of 1990-91 and 1991-92 grants limited the planning and implementation of many programs.  The reduction of 1992-93 grant to $10,000.  Statistical reports identifying special groups of children and their programs were not identified or tracked. 10 Obstacles Impeding the APIG (cont.)  Data was not collected on tutoring groups to track progress.  Mobility of the schools' populations throughout the school year.  The change in standardized tests during the grant period affected continuity.  Long-term planning was affected by the short period of the grants. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the APIG be continued in those area schools whose application content contains the following information:  A need for the project and identification of statistical data that will be used to document success.  A detailed program description including program goals, organizational management, curriculum, personnel, and staff training, if needed.  A plan of operation including project management operation, such as goals, strategies, timelines, etc.  An evaluation plan describing the methods to be used to evaluate the effectiveness of each component/strategy outlined in this program.  A budget sheet containing an itemized list of requests and costs to support the grant. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to provide to the area schools additional funds through the APIG for the purpose of increasing academic achievement for all students and to reduce disparity. Evaluation Criteria Documentation of continued improvement as evidenced on norm and criterion reference tests. Recommendation (cont.) Expected Benefits 11 The LRSD will meet its commitment to increasing academic achievement for all students and reduce disparity. Impact Analysis This recommendation will assist the district in complying with its current desegregation plan. It will afford the area schools the resources, materials, and staff development needed to meet the needs of students. Resource Analysis The area schools that applied for funds during the three-year grant period spent a combined total of approximately $1,099,803 in the following categories: 1. Core Curriculum 2. Enrichment Activities that Broaden Student Experiences 3. Parental Involvement 4. Equipment, Supplies, etc. 5. staff Development Force Field Analysis Percentage of Funds Soent in the Cateaories 45.8% 7.2% 2.5% 35.9% 8.6% Supporters of this recommendation will include area school principals, staff, community and Central Office who see the need for the area schools to be provided additional funds to assist all students in achieving success as well as reducing disparity. There should be no primary detractors to this recommendation. Kesource Analysis \\Cont.) ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANT EXPENDITURES School FY 90-91 FY 91-92 FY 92-93 I Bale 23,021 22,083 9,201 Brady 13,205 23,716 9,797 Badgett 5,440 19,700 4,625 McDermott 4,335 23,744 o- Baseline 0 14,457 10,513 Fair Park 18,666 15,655 10,089 Forest Park 11,488 21,839 8,771 Franklin 22,195 (7) 0 Chicot 3,994 9,397 7,204 Western Hills 15,083 18,062 7,434 Jefferson 22,609 25,492 26,009 Cloverdale 21,164 28,705 9,918 Dodd 17,548 24,523 8,870 Meadowcliff 22,531 27,426 11,592 Geyer Springs 16,464 31,522 6,729 Pulaski Heights 24,063 20,455 6,376 Romine 0 6,275 8,910 Washington 0 0 3,789 Wilson 21,102 6,625 6,826 Woodruff 14,615 31,267 7,154 Mabelvale 23,707 24,631 9,893 Terry 18,917 21,861 4,399 Fulbright 13,729 9,245 2,924 Otter Creek 20,351 21,168 9,551 Wakefield 15,228 27,080 5,069 Watson 19,088 31,805 8,891 Total Elementary 388,543 506,726 204,534 - - 12 123/GRANTS 7-15-93 TOTAL 54,305 46,718 29,765 28,079 24,970 44,410 42,098 22,188 20,595 40,579 74,110 59,787 50,941 61,549 54,715 50,894 15,185 3,789 34,553 53,036 58,231 45,177 25,898 51,070 47,377 59,784 1,099,803 General Implementation Plan 10-18-93 10-18-93 10-27-93 11-17-93 11-19-93 11-24-93 12-8-93 12-10-93 Activity Request for Academic Progress Incentive Grant Proposals Application instructions for the writing of the APIG proposals Grant writing inservice for all area school principals Follow-up session for grant writing process Grant Review Panel Grant Review Panel Grant Review Panel Grant deadline for the 1993-94 APIG to be received 13 Person(s) Responsible Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Donita Hudspeth Director of staff Development Donita Hudspeth Director of staff Development Estelle Matthis Sterling Ingram Russ Mayo Victor Anderson Larry Robertson Margaret Gremillion APJG St.mnary Report - School -~B~a~dg~e,.,t..,_t_,E'-'l..,_emen=~t~arc,y._ ______________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. To establish and l\"\"lement procedures to decrease  Hininun Performance Test results for 3rd grade in  Monitored test data of MAT-6 and MPT results. 1991 disparity and increase educational achievements among math was 92X, an increase of SX. The disparity in 3rd students in grades 2-6 f....-w:tioning one or more years grade was 31X in reading between black males/white  An academic skills development plan was written for each below grade level in reading and math. males, and 17X between black females and white females . child who fell below 85X in reeding and math. 2. Develop and raise set festeem.  Student actfvftfes were provided to develop and  Peer Tutoring enhance set festeem and personal growth. 3. To enrich parental involvement.  Monthly parental (Systematic Teaching Effective  Test scores were flll)roved. Parenting Skills (STEP Program) meetings.  STEP Program 8 to 9 parents attended. 1991- 1. To es Ubl ish and lrrplement procedJres to decrease  Mfnfn.m Performance Test results showed black females  Data was collected from MPT, Stanford 8, Grade 1992 dhpedty end increase edxatfonal achievements among end males had an increase of 20% in math. Black Distribution Reports, Interim Reports. students fn grades 26 ft.nctfontng one or more years females on the average had an increase of 60X fn below grade level fn reading an math. language arts and social studies.  An academic skills \u0026amp;!velopne!flt plan was written for each child who fell below 85X in reading and math. 2. Develop and rafse set f-esteem.  Student actfvfttes were provided to develop and emance self-esteem and personal growth.  Peer Tutoring 3. To enrfch parental involvement. * STEP Program  8 to 12 parents attended.  Monthly parental (STEP Program) meetings 1992- 1. To establ fsh ard fq,lement proced.Jres to decrease  Student date (grades, MPT, Stanford 8), with the use * 3rd grade MPT test scores were 85X plus mastery in 1993 disparity and increase ed.Jcatfonal achievements among of the Abecus was closely monitored to assess students reacting and math. The 6th grade had 85X mastery in students in grades 26 hr,ctfonfng one or more years inastery of curriculun objectives. reading. below grade level in reading an .. th. * Peer Tutoring  Student activities were provided to develop and enhance 2. Develop end raise set f-estffffl. self -esteem ard personal growth.  Monthly parental meetings (STEP Program). 3. To enrich parental involvement.  More parental involvement - 12 to 15 parents attended . Badgett Elementary School Page Z Sumtary SUtMW!nt The Academic Progress Incentive Grant was used to meet the needs of the stl.dents by providing activities to develop ard raise self esteem, personal growth,\nnprove test scores ard academics. The third grade HPT scores were 85X plus mastery In reading and math fn 199293. The r~tion In disparity and increased achievement fs directly related to fU'lds from the Academic Progress Jncentfve Grant. Obstacles to Goal Attaf~nt In 199092 we had a serious need for enrichment, supplies, and N:Jfpnent that we felt would help fnprove standardized test scores, provide self motivatfon and qoal setting, and materials for more hards on activities and afternoon tutoring. *1992-93 - Orders for 1992-93 were denied ci.te to Purchasing Reyisftfon not turned in on tfrne, However, we were wafting for Stanford 8 test results end asked for allotted time, which was granted. APJG Slmnery Report  School __B _a_le_E_l....,, ta_ r_y_ ________________ YHr Goals RHults 1990 Evaluation Criteria/Process 1. To increase reading and math achievement levels of 1. 79% of targeted 6th graders passed the reading test 1. Assessment of MPT Scores fn Reading and Math 1991 atrlsk 5th and 6th grade students. SOX of the targeted students passed the math on the 2. Assessment of MAT-6 scores in Reading and Math HPT. 55X of students thought the reading coq:,onent was 3. Assessment of Student Evaluation Survey 2. To reduce the disparities fn test scores. helpful and nx thought the math was helpful. 4. Assessment of Learning Centers and lnservice Surveys 2. 5. Assessment of Parent Coq:\u0026gt;onent. On the MAT-6 the targeted students showed  .5 year 3. To increase Parental Involvement gafn In reeding end 1.3 year gain fn math. 3. On the Evaluatfon Survey 55X of the study center participants thought additional time on the c\"\"\"ter lab was helpful. 36% thought ft was somewhat helpful. 91% of the teachers reported st~t response was excellent. 4. Learning Center Jnservfce - 83% partfcfpant1 - very helpful. 100l used centers fn classroom. !13X of atudenta In classroont used the center. 5. Parent C~t - 85 perfflta attended a workshop and lnservfcea. 43 perenta voluiteered to speak to classrOClffil. *Three newsletter were mafled to 385 students. *Handouts were b9de av f table to perenta of participating students. APIG SUW1ary Report - Bale Page 2 1991 1992 1992 1993 Surmary Statement 1. To increase the achievement level fn reading, math, science and social su.dfes of targeted atrisk students In grades K-6. 2. To reduce the disparities in test scores 3. To increase Parental tnvolvement 1. To Increase the achievement level of atrlak students fn reeding, math, acfence end social studies of targeted atriak atudentl in 9rades K6. 2. To red.Jee the disparities fn test scores 3. To Increase Parental Involvement 1. Two parent workshops were held. Materials and stipend were given. one workshop for 3rd end 6th grade students was held (HPT) The Parent Resource Room was in operation as a support. Newsletters were sent five times d.iring the year. There were ten participatory activities including class speakers - 159 parents were involved in 1991- 92 2. Invoices were evidenced for Science, Social Studies, Math and language Arts materials\nthat included trade books, Big Book, Classroan Sets, States Books, Science Nterhls, and the purchase of a contract from the Science Husl!llft. Math manipulations base ten blocks, pattern blocks, play money and other materials for the Learning Center coq:,onent. 3. Two tnservlces were held that fncluded stipends. 4. Cafns fn NCE Scores\nReeding: Basic Skill gains  4.57 Math: Advenced skills gains  5.07 Basic Skill gains 2.44 Advenced skills gains 10.99 1. Ten parent Involvement activities were held. Eighty-eight parents participated Newsletters were Sl!nt Parent Resource Room continued 2. lnvofcea for purchase of inaterfels are evidenced for Science, Social Studies, Hath and Language Arts 3. Stcdent achievement evidenced an Increase In NCE scores at each grade level In math and reading. The Stanford 8 Test Scores evidenced an overall Increase In 1992-93 at Ba\\e Elementary School. 1. Assessment of Parent Carponent 2. Assessment of Materials Purchased 3. Assessment of Steff Oevelopnent Activities 4. Assessment of Student Scores 1. Assessment of Parent Involvement Co,rponent 2. Assessment of Materials Purchased 3. Assessment os Student Scores NCE scores were avafleble for 223 students at Bale Elementary School. 195 students scor@d at grade level on the NCE Total Basic Battery. The 1993 tl!-st scores fell within the low average to high average percentile rank on the Nonna\\ Distribution of stanfne9, 64 students scored 50% and above, APIG Surmary R~rt  Bale School Page 3 88X of the students tested at B8le evidenced at grade level scores as evidenced by low average to above average scores on the normative curse. In the third year of the tncentfve Crant Program 18 students were exited from the Chapter One Reading Program as a result of in::proved scores It is the opinion of the Bale School Incentive Grant conmittee that the strategies and ft.n:fing of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant has been helpful. However it is believed that there has beM dupl feat ion of efforts . Consequently the fi..nding could be used to assist the inplementatfon of strategies yet not require that separate plans be written, approved and inpl~nted. Host of the strategies were placed in: Chapter One School tnprovement Plan and School trrprovement Plan Reconmendation: Allow additional fll'\"ldfng for area schools by budgeting for the School lnprovement Plans. Obstacles to Coal Attairment Full SfflOlrlt of grant was not recefved durfng 1992-93. APIG Sunnary Report  School _ _,,B,,as.,ee.,lw.i'-'ne\"-'E-'l_,,,emen='-'t,,_ary...._ _______________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 1. 1991 2. 3. 1991 1. To increase student achievement ard reduce Teachers reported establ f shing positive relations wf th Analysis and disaggregation of Stanford Achievement Test 1992 disparities by providing a ffve week surmer l fteracy the students who participated in the sunner program. date fn COfll)rehension and thinking skfl ls program for Identified at-risk students In grades 1-6. Teachers reported that students' attitude toward reading lnproved. However,  revf ew of the records fndfcated the average growth In reeding coq:,rehensfon 2. on the SAT of the students who participated did not meet the objective goal. 3. 1992 1. 1993 2. 3. SU'Tffll'lry Statement Les!lt than half of the grant money available to Baselfne School was spent. A need stfll exists at thff school, The black enroll~nt of n.2'l black currently exceeds the guidelines established by the des~regatfon plan for an area school. The test scores at the prf,nery level frdtcate a need for eddltfonal fnterventfons. The S35,053 not spent at Basel fne could be put to good use to fnprove the language development and 1Mthematfc1 ski l la of Basel lne students, Obstacles to Coal Attefrment A.PIG SUTmary Report - School __ .,.B,._,ro,,dy\"-'E\"-'l'-'\"\"'\"\"=\"-'t\"'o\"-r:,..._ ______________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Crfteda/Process 1990  1. lo increase academic achievement and to reduce  EPSF results demonstrated an average of sixteen  Analysis of Early Prevention of School Failure for 1991 disparity in language arts and math for grades K-6. months growth. k. indergarten students. 2. To increase student motivation and self -esteem.  Grade 1 achieved grade level norm of 1. 7 and  Assessment and analysfs of HAT-6 and HPT test results. disparity was redJced by 1X. 3. To Increase parental involvement.  Provided TESA fnservfce for teachers.  MPT scores Increased fn reading, math, and science.  Provided math and science work.shops for teachers.  Dfsparfty decreased in math achievement at all grade levels except at Grade 6.  Provided Kindergarten, Primary, and Intermediate \\lorkshops for parents. * Increased classroom achievement (report cards) In Grades 2, 3, 5, and 6.  Reduced tardf es by 2X and absences to 1. 7X per student. 1991 1. To Increase academic achievement and to red.Jee * 96X of all teachers were trained fn TESA.  Anolysls of Erly Prevention of School Failure (EPSF) 1992 disparity In language arts and math for grades K-6. for kindergarten students. * 95X of the parents attending the workshop were k-3 2. To Increase test taking skill  In grades 16. parents. Only 5X were Intermediate parents.  Assessment and analyah of Stanford 8 and MPT test results. 3. To Increase aelfesteeni and motivation. *EPSF demonstrated an average of fifteen ,nonths growth. * Academic and behavior awards each nine weeks. * Grade 2 Increased the c~sfte score on standardized testing by 6X. * Math ach f evement on the Stanford S increased  t all grade level except Grade 6. APIG SIM'!ARY REPORT -Brady Page 2 1992 1993 S1.111Mr\ny Statement 1. To\nncrease academic achievement and to reduce disparity in language arts using an interdisciplinary approach for grades K-6. 2. To increase student writing process ski l ls and irrprove self-esteem. 3. To irrprove parent recruitment.  Disparity significantly decreased between black  Analysis of Early Prevention of School Failure (EPSF) females and other sub-groups. Black females achieved a kindergarten students. 16X higher passage rate from SOX to 88X.  66X of all awards were earned by minority students.  SOX fewer suspensions occurred during the second and third quarter.  Kindergarten students having considerable needs on the EPSF were rKfuced by 19X in receptive language end 23X in expressive language.  Grade 3 increased passage in reading (by 19%) and math (3X) on HPT (both areas over 85X rate). * Crede 6 passed the reading end math areas of the HPT\u0026gt; * C0ff1)0S f te scores on the Stanford 8 f ncreased at Grades 3, 5, and 6.  Students suspension decreased by 70X from the previous year.  Nonblack population Increased by 12% over two periods.  Assessment and analysis of Stanford 8 and MPT test results.  Student A\\.lards and recognition for writing.  Recruitment of parents to improve racial balance. lf'Yl\u0026lt;\u0026gt;vatfve currlculun resources which increased achfev~nt among students with varying learning modalities were provided through the area school incentive grants. Selfeste~ has been enhanced and di sci pl inery referrals have ~reased by 70X. Bredy students are achieving greater success, pertlcularly fn reading cooprehension and math and the disparity bet~en groups has been reduced. Obstacles to Coal Attairment Approximately 25X  26X of the student population h new to Bredy Elementary School each year, APIG SUTm8ry Report  School __ __,C,:.hc.i_,.co,ct'-=E-\"lomen==ta\"-ry.._ _____________ _ Year Coals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 1. To increase educational achievement and decrease 1. Targeted students were not monitored this year. 1. Analysis and disaggregation of HPT and HAT-6 results. 1991 disparities by providing enriched activities for students in grades 3. 4, and 6. 2. 600 (parents, students and teachers) attended the 2. A school-wide Zoo Picnic was provided. school-wide Zoo Picnic. 2. Increase Parental Involvement 3. Reward parties, badges, stickers, ribbons and pencils 3. 500 students received academic and/or incentives were awarded to students for i~roved academf cs/behavior. 3. Provide student awards and incentives for behavior. 1991 1. To increase educational achievement and decrease 1. MPT in 3rd grade showed growth fn all areas. Math ,. Analysis and di saggregat f on of MPT and Stanford 8 1992 disparities in targeted 3rd, 4th, and 6th grade students dfsperfty decreased froni 28X to 6X. Total reading from results. by providing extended day ectlvltles. 65X poss Ing to 84X. Heth from 56X pessing to 84X. 2. A school-wide Zoo Picnic was provided. 2. Provide stu::tent enrichment actfvttfes 2. Many field trips that broadened students experience base were made avaf table to students. 3. Reward parties, badges, stickers, ribbons and pencils 3. Increase Parental Involvement were awarded to students for fq::,roved academic/behavior. 3. 600 (parents, students and teachers) attended the 4. Provide student awards and incentives school-wide Zoo Picnic. 4. 500 students received academic and/or incentives for behavior. 1992 1. To increase educational achievement and decrease 1. HPT 3rd grade dropped in reeding end moth. 6th 1. Analysis and disaggregation of MPT and Stanford 8 1993 disperltles In tergeted 3rd, 4th, end 6th grade students grede had gains in al,nost all areas with both slb- results. by providing extended day ctfvltles. groups 2. A school-wide Zoo Picnic was provided. 2. Provide student enrichment activities 2. Many field trips that broadened students experience base were made aval table to students. 3. Reward parties, badges, stickers, ribbons and penct ls 3. Increase Parental tnvolv~t were awarded to students for fq:,roved academic/behavior. 3. 600 (Parenti, students ard teachers) attended the 4. Provide student awards and Incentives school-wide Zoo Picnic. 4. 500 students received ecadenlic and/or Incentives for behavf or. Chicot Eltm0ntery School Page 2 St..mnary Statement In surmary Chicot effectiveness in year three conpared to the prior years was disappointing. Gains ~re not as strong in year three. Third grade dropped in reading and math. Sixth grade had gains in alt areas with both sub-groups. Black males showed growth in alt areas except math. However, Chicot has bt!en consistent fn lowering sixth grade mates disparities. Obstacles to Goal Attef....-nent Approval of 90-91 grant came so late that many facets of the grant were not approved. A reduction in the amount of the 9293 grant r~ed the amount of student incentives/awards. APIG SU11118ry Report  School ~ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 1. Staff Development  to increase awareness of  After school tutoring was replaced with the homework Analysts end disaggregation of test scores (HPT, HAT-6) 1991 effective teaching techniques center, forty students participate\u0026lt;! in grade 16 *MPT at 3rd and 6th grades evidenced growth Decrease fn student referrals to the office 2. Increase student achievement by providing an after  MAT-6 evidenced growth in every grade and subject school tutor f ng program target f ng spec if f c students in  SOX decrease In office referrals Hore stable student population grades 1-6 who scored below the national average on MAT-  Good Times Club Incentive Program established for 6. students displaying appropriate behavior 3. Honthly incentive programs offered to all students who dfspl eyed approprf ate behavf or ard academf c awards 4. Increased parent f nvol vement 1991 1. Staff Devel~t  to increase awarenHs of *Acadenilc awards assetrbly (each 9 weeks) Analysis and disaggregation of test scores (HPT, Stanford 1992 effective teaching techniques (200 plus students) 8)  Spaghett I Supper 2. Homework Center  provide\u0026lt;! irdlviduelhe\u0026lt;I  Seven fnservfces held during this year Decrease fn student referrals to the office instruction to studfflt1 needing extra help tn reading  All 3rd ord 6th grade atudents gained in achievement ard math In gredes 1 6.  97 students participate\u0026lt;! in the Amual Science Fair More stable student poflUlatlon 3. Monthly incentive programs offered to oil students who displayed appropriate behavior and ocodeftlic awards 4. Jncreased parent fnvolVefRflt (TAP) 1992 1. Staff Oevelopnent  to Increase awareness of  HOffll!WOrk Center  pertfcfpanta test scores Increased Analysis and disaggregation of test  cores (HPT, Stanford 1993 effective teaching techniques by 10X 8)  Science Fair  cause lndepth research/Increased 2. Homework Center  provide\u0026lt;! lrdivlduel he\u0026lt;! ach f evement f n the area of 1c fence Decrease In student referrals to the office fnstructfon to student\u0026amp; needing extra help fn reading  Good Tines ChA\u0026gt;/owards oueot\u0026gt;l let \u0026lt;II otudents) ard Nth in gredes 1 6.  Speghett I Supper More stable student poflUlation  Continued decreaee In office referrals 3. Monthly incentive progrems offered to all students  Stobll ity of student poflUlation was not neuured who displayed appropriate behavior ard acodeoiic awards 4. Increase\u0026lt;! parent lnvolveoent (TAP) SI.IT'fflllry Statement The APIG helped enable Cloverdale students to evidence tremendous growth on the Mini- perforNnCe tut In 3rd and 6th grades. Students evidence\u0026lt;! growth in all grades ard slA\u0026gt;ject areas on the \"\"\" reference te-st. In slfflNlry to APIG has proven to be a very valueble asset to Cloverdale Elementary, Cloverdale was one of two schools to Nfter the MPT at the 851 level at 3rd and 6th grade-a fn all areas, Cloverdale Elementary Pege 2 Obstacles to Goel Attafrment Oele i in rant e rovel in 90-91 9192 end the reduction in rent M'IOU\"ltS to S10 000 in 92  93 were the reetest obstacles. APIG SU111111ry Report School --~D~odd=----------------- Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 ,. To increase academic achievement for all students. Data reflected no growth In the 1991 MPT scores as  Staff development fn ffve areas was provided for the 1991 carpared to the 1990 scores In the 6th grade. staff along with stipends for training. 2. To reduce the dispar-fttes fn ecademfc achievement among gr\u0026lt;\u0026gt;l4)S formed on the bas fa of race, gender, and  Saturday School was scheduled for 6th graders. Six economk status . teachers wf l l provide remedfatfon. 1991  1. To increase academic achievement for oil atudenta . MPT data reflected an increase fn 3rd grade scores fn  Staff developnent for staff to emance teaching. 1992 reading and SSl Nstery In Nth. Sfgntffcant fnc:rease 2. To redJce the disparities In academic achievement In scores fn the 6th grade MPT In ell areas with 96% or  Extended day for 3rd graders 2 times per week. among groups formed on the bests of race, gender, and above mastery fn s-eadfng and 85X mastery fn Nth and economic statue. language arts.  Extended day for 6th graders 3 tf11es per week. 1992 1. To Increase academic achievement for all 1tudenta . MPT data reflected o decrease In 3rd grade reading and  Video storybooks to address c~rehensfon were developed 1993 91l Nltery In th. Sixth grade MPT Increased to 100l to share with the parents to be reenforce reeding. 2. To redJce the dispar i ties In ocadetolc ochle\"\"\"\"'\"t Nltery In reedfng for all groups and 86X mastery In among gr0l4)S fonned on the basis of race, gender, end th for oil groupo .  Parent resource banks were developed to provide economic atatus . materials for home. S1.J11N11ry Stet~t Test data reflects fflOre of an increase fn academic achfevemtt1t fn the 199193 9chool years, The flprovement fn test scores hes be-en attributed to the team plamfnq of the staff . Enphasfs was placed on staff devel9P!!!mt tutoring programs erd parent-school Involvement, The strong focus on these three strategies erovlded to be successful for studt-nts . Obstacles to Goel Attairment pate reflects a steady fl,provenent Jn achievement\nhowever, no dat  was recorded on the targeted students who attfflded Saturday School and extended day. APIG Sllffllllry Report School ___ f:..,a._,i.,_r-'P\"'a:.:.r_,.k _____________ _ Year Goals Results Eve l uat ion Crf terf a/Process 1990 1. To increase acadeniic achievement for all students. Test scores did not reflect a sfgnfffcant gafn. Four teachers were selected to tutor targeted students 1991 after school three t\nmes a week for nfne weeks. Bus 2. To reduce the disparities In academic achievement transportation and snacks were provided. Parents were among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and fnservfced. economic status. 1991  1. To Increase academic achievement for all students. Nine weeks of tutoring for 23 students did result In Stiff development for plamfng strategies to iffl)rove 1992 higher achievement on the MPT scores, One night per academl c achievement. l111\u0026gt;lementation of the STEP program 2. To reduce the disparities In academic achievement week for 9 weeks lasting 2 hours per session proved to for parents to assist their children to achieve. among gr~ formed on the bes ls of race, gender, end economic  tatus. be successful by the l\"Ultler of parents participating. 1992 1. To increase academic achievement for all students, Nine weeks of tutoring for 32 students did result In Materials to Increase student achievement and test 1993 higher stanford 8 scores fn language arts. HPT 1cores practices were p..irchesed. Multicultural sets of books, 2. To reduce th disparities In acadffllc achievement reflect a higher percentage of students mastering the ffeld tr fps, end fncentfves were ffl8de aval table to staff among groups formed on the best  of race, gender, and MPT In both 3rd and 6th\nrade. and students. econorafc status. Sl.fflNlry Statement An assessment tndfcatts that an fncreese fn ecademfc echtevfffll!nt was made fn Somf! content area and a d@crease fn others on the Stanford 8 test, The MPT scores reflect a posftfve gafn. The after school tutoring program was a success fn that all students attended the sessions and parents contact among the minority Increased. Obstacles to Goal Attef~t Erl fer plamfng to support longer periods of tutoring for different groups according to the ne-eds fn the content area would have provided services to ,nore st~ts, APIG SU111111ry Rport - School __ ....:.,:Fo.,_r.:a._st'--'-P\"a\"rk'--------------- Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. To increase 1cademlc achievement for all students. Grad 3 MPT data roflctl!d NStory of roading--93X 1. Staff developnent sessions were scheduled for teacher 1991 (92), math- -99X. No disparity in math. on th 6th training to motivate staff. 2. To rodJ\u0026lt;: th dispariti in academic achlov..,..,t grade MPT, s-eac:Hng, 98X (total), black male, 100%\nblack fomals, 92X. Math, 100X for all groups. 2. Science enr i chrnent mater fa ls and mot f vat f ona l among groups formed on the bash of race, gender, end Language Arts mastery  91X total, 75X for black males Incentive were purchased for the ttK:ouragement of acedemi c ecOOOfllc status. and feules. ach i evemmt. 1991- 1. To Increase academic achievement for all students. MPT data reflected high mastery for all groups, total 1. Staff devlopmont was continued throughout the year on 1992 98X, black mals 100%, black fomals 90%. Sixth grad the Master Teacher Program. 2. To reduce the df1perftfes in academic achfevfffil!f'lt mestery in 3 our of 5 areas. Lfttl disparity between among groups fonned on the basla of race, gender, and races. Stanford 8 data reflected all class totals 2. Educational progrems plus the Homework Center were K:OflOnlic status. abov 50 NCE. Black students below 50 NCE fn al I grade ft.nded including sl4Jl)l fes, materials, and stipends. totals. 3. The parent STEP Program was made avaf table to parents of th high risk. 1992- 1. To fncre  se academic achievement for all students. MPT data reflected 100X for all gr\"'-\"\" In grade 3. 1. Materials, ed.Jcatfonal equfpnent, and suppl fes were 1993 Sixth grade mastery fn 3 our of 5 areas. Black. females purchased for staff to enhance teaching. 2. To red.Jee the df1perftles fn acadetftic achfevetnent Nde 1teady progress. Stanford 8 data reflected an emong groups fonned on the basis of race, gender, and fnc:re  se above 50 NCE fn all class totals. The totals 2. Extended day for tutoring 6th grade atrisk students econon.fc status. of black students Increased fn  range of 2 NCE tn the fncludfng snacks and trans,x.rtatfon was scheduled. 5th grade to +14 NCEs fn grades 1 and 2. SUT1N1ry Statement Forest Park has strong parent support groups across the grades. Since teachers have full support in getting voh.l'\\tttrs to assist them fn their classes, students benefit in having many projK:ts and actfvi fes to enrich their ltves (lbstacl .. to Goal Attafrmont Targeted students were not tracked fn the ext~ day tutoring 5Hsfons to record Stanford 8 test data to inonitor progress. AP I G Sl.fflllllry Rport  School Year Goals Results Evaluation Crfterh/Process 1990 1. Increase the suc:cess rate of minority students as 1. A gain of 7.1X of students achieving at or above 1. To see an increase fn tests cores of 80 students 1991 well as all students - a reduction in disparity. th 50 percnt fl on th MAT-6. Th AHPT showed a reading below grade level and needing assistance. reduction In disparity. 2. To provide workshops for parents (13) to increase 2. Enhance parent involvement in the school process. 2. SevM workshops were plamed for parents  parent participation with their children. valuations all posltlv. 3. To increase sel festeem through COlXlStlor services. J. Increase self-esteem of the children involved. J. Kits were purchased for the cou,selor to teach studc!nts on sel festeem. 1991 1. 1 ncrease the success rate of minority students es 1. Test scores Increase In reading and math on the 1. Research centers used fn classrooms to increase 1992 well as all studentl  a reduction In disparity. AMPT. academic achievement ard red.Jee dfsparfty. 2. Parnts of atrlsk students In grades 14 had two 2. Parent workshops In grade 4 continued with posltlv 2. Enhanc parent lnvolv......,t In th school procss. lnsrvlc In March and April. feedback. J. Students had birthday acknowledgomonts, field 3. Counselor continued selfesteet1 classes. J. Iner sel fostoffl of the children Involved. tripe, etc. that Inspired aelfosteffl. 1992 1. Increase the success rate of 11fnorfty students  1. Targeted studentl - progrss In radlng with 1. Blow grade lvl students wll l be targeted for 1993 well as all students   reduction In disparity. Htl of trade books thlt contained high lntrst, low f~rovement fnterventfon. vocabulary. 2. Iner ..  sel fest..,. of the children Involved. 2. Contlrue the coo..nsllng and lncontlvu for the 2. THchers obsrved atudentl exhilarating high self Increase of selfesteea as measured by staff observations. eltfffl and an Increase fn thefr l fvea for reeding through different tachlng strategies. SUT1Mry Statement To 1upplement the re,qular reading progr for all atl.dentl, ft,.nds were used to p..,rchase a varfety of enrichment tnaterfals to be used by all teachers f.e. trade books, high interest/low vocababulary l htenlng centers, fllJltfcultural u,fta and speehl materfals to enhance language develq,nrot for kindergarten and first graders. Research centers were purchased and located In modJles throughout all grade levels. Parent workshop material, field trlo[s for enrichment selfestff!! kits for teaching, fncenttves for learning and transportation were all provided through thf APJG, Obstaclu to Goal Attalrmont The school report that classrOOffl teachers conducted their own evaluation of their 1tudents thrOUffh classwork performance, test scores, and standardized test results, Records are available of all materials p.,rchased and fLnds scw\nnt, Hawver  1tathtlcal report fdentffytng 9pec1ffc groups of targeted children and thefr progrant was not provided by the school thus preventing a future tracking of the gry to Mteraf nerd progress, A.PIG Surmery Report - School -~G~x~~r_S~p~r~l~ns~E~l~omon=~t~r~y\"----------------- Year Goals Results Eve luat ion Crf terf a/Process 1990- 1. To increase academic achievement end reduce *Targeted students showed seven months or more increase *Assessment and analysis of MAT-6 ard MPT test results. 1991 disparities for targeted students operating one or more in achievement on MAT-6. *Provided additional CoopJter time for identified years below grade level in grades 2-6 in reading and *3rd ard 6th grade students who participated In this students. math. program pass MPT with 85% mastery. *Provided two parent Malce and Take \\Jorlcshops. students self-esteem was measured by office referrals *Provided a Parental Workshop. z. To Increase self-esteem of students which was reduced by 75X. 55x of all parents participated In Hake end Tako Workshops 3. To increase parental f nvo l vement 4ox of parents partkfpeted in the after school tutoring program. 1991 1. To increase academic achievement end reduce *Targeted students showed a 10X or more NCE gain on *Assessment and analysis of Stanford 8 and MPT test 1992 disparities for targeted students operating one or more Stanford a. results. yeers below grade level in grades 2-6 fn readfng and *Targeted 3rd grade students mastered reading on HPT. *Provided additional co,rputer time for identified math. *Targeted 6th grade students mastered all areas of MPT students. except Science and Social Studies. *Provided two parent Make and Take Workshops. z. To increase self-esteem of students st~U self-esteem was measured by office referrals *Provided two Parental \"orkshops. which was rOQJCed by 85%. 60X of all parents pert i cl pated In Make and Take 3. To Increase parental f nvol vement llorkshops. 3ox of parent  participated in the after school tutoring program. 1992- ,. To Increase academic achievement and reoJCe Targeted student  showed a 2% or more NCE gain on *Assessment and analysfs of Stanford 8 and MPT test 1993 dfsperftles for targeted stt..dents operating one or inore Stanford a. results. years below grade level fn grades 2-6 in reading  nd *Targeted 3rd grade students mastered  ll  reas on the *Provided two parent Make end Take Workshops. Nth. HPT. *Provided Two Parental \\lorkshopsa *Targeted 6th grade students mastered reading and Nth z. To increase self-esteent of 1tudenta on MPT. *Student 1elf-estem was measured by off fee referrals which oocreosed by 5X frono lest year. 3. To Increase parental Involvement *Parent pertfcfpetfon in Make and Take workshops Increased 2l from l  t year. *40X of parent  participated In the after school tutorial program. SllTffll!lry Statement The Incentive grant has contributed f~ely to the ed.Jcatfonal excellN\"ICe of students at Geyer Springs School, Obviously the more ft.rds afforded the school, the more plamed activities we could have .,,fth obfective data to 1t,.pport the academic progress of students, Goals wel\"e met fn the areas of flrprovfnq 9el f-esteem, ftrprovfng the over11l l population ecedefflfc achievement, and finally lessening Geyer Springs Elementary  APtG Page 2 Obstacles to Goal Attairrnent APIG St.mnery Report  School ___ J~e~f~f~er~~on~E~l~emen=-\"t\"a,._ry.__ _____________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. lo improve reading and writing skills of * E\"l)irical data reported an increase in language and * Teacher observation of students' early motivation and 1991 kindergarten and first grade students. writing skills. success in reading and writing skills. 2. To inc rease enthusiasm/rr.otivation toward reading and + Errpirical data also showed favorable improvements in * Comparison of whole class HAT-6 scores from 1989-90 and writing. writing sa~les from begiming to end of year. 1990-91. 3. To decrease the disparity between black and white  Ho objective data was avai table this first year. students . 1991 - 1. To i rrprove reading and writing sk fl ls of  See 1990-91 first two resut ts. *Teacher observation of students' early motivation and 1992 kindergarten, first and second grade students. success in reading and writing skills.  Corrparison of MAT-6 and Stanford scores showed an 2. To increase enthusiasm/motivation toward reading and Increase of 6 percentile points in language arts  COOl)8rison of whole class HAT-6 scores from 1990-91 and writing. related areas. Three points in total reading NCE. 1991-92 Stanford. 3. To decrease the black/white disparity.  Coq:,arison of individual test scores for growth of children in the program for 2 years. 1992- 1. To f~rove reading and writing skflls of * See 1991-92 first two results.  Teacher observation of students' early motivation and 1993 le fndergarten, first and second grade students. success in reading and writing skills.  Objective data showed an fncrease of 10 percentile 2. To increase enthusiasm/motivation toward reeding and points In total reading  51st to 61st percent I le.  C~rison of whole class Stanford scores from 1991-92 writing. and 1992-93. * 37 out of 75 2nd grade students showed growth of 7 3. To decrease the bleck/\"11te disparity. months or more - 19 were black students.  COOl)arison of individual test scores for growth of children fn the program for 2 years. Surmary Statement Teachers and parents feel that the \\lrftfng to Reed and \\lrftfng to Urfte Programs are beneficial for children from all backqrOUlds and with various learning styles. Errpfrlcal data Indicates a growth In self-esteem, early school successes, confid4!nce in creative writing and an Increase fn expressive language skills, Obstacles to Goel Attairment oue to the grade levels being targeted, obfectlve data has bttn more dffffcult to docunent, Changing frOffl MAT-6 to Stanford 8 made whole group conperlsons difficult for one year. Also, our attendance zone changed whe-n tcing School was ffled which again has made co,rparfson end following stt.dents more dffffcult, The secord grade lilrftfng to Urfte progrl!!lffl has been easier to objectively docunent due to having test evidence from preceding year  that evf~e was very positive, APIG Sutmary Report  School ---\"~=be=lv~=l=e_E~l=emen=~t=~ry~---------- Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 1. To Increase academic achievement for all students. Date from the MPT end MAT-6 did not reflect en Increase Cooperative learnfng and Learning Styles workshops were 1991 In achievement or e redJctfon In disparity. scheduled for staff to eMance teaching. An intense 2. To reduce the dfsperttfes In  cadefflfc achievement conm.mfcatfon process and lnservfces were set ~ to keep among gr~ formed on the basts of race, gender, and parents involved with their school. economic status. 1991 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. MPT dote reflected 85X 11estery (en Increase) In Writing to Reed Program es f\"\"lemented. Peer tutoring was 1992 reading. Sheth grade Stanford 8 data reflected all fff1)lemented at noon. Saturday School for 6th graders. 2. To redJce the disparities In academic achievement class totals below the 50 NCE. IEP'a were developed Class sheets were reviewed each 9 weeks. emong gr\"'-\"5 formed on the basis of race, gender, end for each etrfsk student. econcni c status. 1992 ,. To Increase academic achievement for all students. MPT dote reflected 85X (an Increase) In reeding ard Teachers taught their specialty In the intermec:Hate grades 1993 scfence. Stanford 8 data reflected all class totals to focus on academic frrprovement. Peer tutoring was 2. To redJce the dfsperftfes tn academic echfev_,,t below 50 NCE wtth en Increase in achievement in grades cont trued. among grC\u0026gt;l.4)5 fanned on the basfa of race, gender, and 1, 2, 3, 4 end 6. economf c status. SLIIINlfY Statement Test scores dfd not reflect slbstantial academic achievement, Enrichment programs lfk:e Math Olynplad, Geography Bowl Gffted(Talented OUh Bowl, Spelling Be-e 1 and Friday Clubs did provide og,or-tuiltfes for students to explore thefr Interests and to be Involved fn working together, Parents have openly expressed thefr Interests and their satfsfactfon with the experiences provided to thefr students as well as the programs provided for them. Obstacles to Goel Attainment The student population at Mabelvale h very t.nStable, Twenty-five percent (25X) of the total school pop.,latfon are inobfle each year. Fifty percent (SOX) of the 3rd graders who fafled math were new to Mabel vale. Sixth percent (60%) of the ahth graders who failed reading were new to the school, An early identification of a targeted gray, of students fn addftfon to plans and monftorfng process rrust be estebl !shed ff accurate data Is to be recorded. APlG SLmT18ry R~rt - School ---'H-\"c\"'0-\"e'-'rmo=t.,_t _____________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 1. To Increase academic ach I evement for all students. Teachers observed kindergarten stl.dents motivated and The first stage of the Writing to Read coq:,uter program 1991 Interested In the \\lritfng to Read program. Grode J HPT was purchased and iff'f)lemented for kindergarten students. 2. To reduce the disperftfes in acadffl!ic achievement data reflected 85% or above mastery fn reading and math Twenty- two teachers were i nservi ced on cooperative emong groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and for all groups. Grade 6 HPT reflected 85X mastery or learning and were furnished materials and supplies. economic status. above fn 3 out of 5 content areas. 1991 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. Grade 3 MPT data reflected mastery fn reading and math. The APIG f\\Mlds were all targeted to the updating of 1992 Sixth graders had mastery in 2 out of 5 content areas. carp.,ter equipnent and materials for the Mritfng to Read 2. To red.Jee the disparities in academic achievement on the Stanford 8, all class totals were below 50 NCE program. First grade students were included this year. emong groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and with little disparity. ecOOOftlf c status. 1992 ,. To Increase academic achievement for all students. Grade 3 MPT data reflected mastery in reading and math. No APIG fl.nds were requested. Teachers tutored individual 1993 Grade 6 MPT data reflected mastery in 4 out of 5 students fn their own classrooms. 2. To reci.Jce the disparities In acedefflic achievement contfflt areas. The one area was 83X cc:,q:\u0026gt;ared to 1992 among gr0l4)5 fonned on the basis of race, gender, and at 64X. on the Stanford S, two classes totaled 50 NCE ecOOOftlic status. or above. S1.mNtry Statement McDermott has a strong parent support and cOffll'U\"lfty involvement. There Is a total of five PartMrs fn EOJCatfon groups assfstfng in tutoring progrems, mentodng, career trafnfng, safety pol ice cadets and recruitfng. One partner has been responsible for the recruitment of 50 famflfes:. The PTA h always first In the district to attafn 100% menbershfp. Obstacles to Goal Attatnnent The school fs not tar9etfng spectffc atrfsk students for tutoring and recordfng statfstfcal date to reflect the academic progress. APIG Sum,ary Report - School -~\"~~ad~o~w~c~l~lf~f ___________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Crfteda/Process 1990- 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. Absenteeism of students dropped as corrpared to 1988- 1. Teachers will receive training fn TESA and Team 1991 89 . Learning to increase academic achievement and reduce Standardized test scores were raised. disparity. Student behavior inproved. 2. To reduce the dfsparltfes in acadeniic achievement Posftfve responses by students and parents in the 2_ Equipnent and materials wfl l be upgraded and purchased among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and school cl fmate surveys. to increase students' test understanding. economic status. 1991 - ,. To increase academf c ach f ev~nt for all students. Staff participation in training for \"network\" COf11)tJters Focus was on 11networking11 the building with a system of 1992 was c~leted. Stanford test data reflected class classroom C0fl1)Uters controlled by a file server located in 2. To reduce the dfsperf t f es In acadernf c ach I evement totals. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 6 were above the 50 NCE. the Med\na Center. among groups formed on the basi  of race, gender, and economic status. 1992- 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. Stanford Test data reflected that class totals fn all The APIG focus was to continue the purchase of classroom 1993 grade were above the 50 NCE. Disparity between 1992 Coq\u0026gt;Uters to Increase the academic progress of all 2. To reciJce the disparities In academic achlev.....,t and 1993 did not deer stl.dents ard to reciJce disparity_ among gr0l4)5 formed on the bash of race, gender, end economic status. Slfflftlllry StetemMt examination of each year's rrport reveals that the first year (1990-91) AIPG Instructional materials and egufpnent were purchased, staff developnent activities were conducted, and parent workshops were held. the following two years (1991-92, 199293) all expenditures were used fn networking the building with COffP:!ter egufpnent to conplete the program. Test data reflected an increase fn achievement fn class totals but the dhparfty has not yet been reduced. Obstacles to Goal Attafrrnent Not targeting spe\ncfffc 9r9':P! in need ard rnalntafnfng stathtfcal data prevent  determination of the success of the teachers' staff developnent on the students' learning. APIG SUffllary Report  School _ _,,o.,_tt..,e.cr_c,.,rc,ec,,e.,,k_,E,_,l\"'emen\"\"\"\"'t\"'a'-ry'----------------- Year Goals Results Evatuatfon Criteria/Process 1990 ,. Enhance educational achievement and reduce  3rd grade students mastered reading and math on HPT.  Assessment and analysis of MAT-6 and HPT test results. 1991 disparities for targeted at-risk students In grades )C\u0026gt;6.  6th grade students mastered all areas of MPT but  Provided academic and gold behavior incentives. 2. Increase sel festeem of students. science and language arts.  Provided fnservices to teachers in TESA, Classroom 3. Increase parents l involvement.  Majority of students scored above 50th percentile on Management and Learning Styles. MAT-6.  Extended Encourager Program.  Growth In r'IUtt\u0026gt;er of black males passing MPT in reading and math at 3rd grade.  Provided transportation to parents for PTA meetings and conferences. 1991 1. Enhance educational achievement and reduce  3rd grade students mastered reading and math on MPT.  Assessment and analysis of Stanford 8 and MPT test 1992 disparities for targeted at-risk students In grades K-6. results.  6th grade students inastered all areas of MPT but 2. Increase sel festeem of students. language arts.  Provided coq:,uter, software, and printers for IC-3. 3. Increase parental f nvo l vement.  Majority of sh.dents scored above 50th percentf le on  Provided manipulative and instructional materials. Stanford 8.  Provided academic and good behavior incentives.  Growth on MPT in science, language arts end social studies for black females In 6th grade.  Enhanced Encourager Program.  Growth fn science and social studies on HPT for black  Provided transportation to parents for conferences. Nle In 6th grade.  Provided parental workshops. APIG Surmary Report - Otter Creek Page 2 1992 1. Enhance educational achievement and reduce 1993 disparities for targeted at - risk students in grades K-6. 2. Increase self - esteem of students. 3. Increase parental involvement. Sl.lT1'Mry Statement  3rd grede students mastered reading and math on HPT. * 6th grade students mastered all areas of HPT but science and language arts. . Increase in nut'Der of students scoring above 50th percentile on Stanford 8.  Growth in nurber of black females passing social studies on HPT in grade 6. * Assessment and analysis of Stanford 8 and MPT test results. * Provided co,rputer software, manipulative and instructional materials for reading, math, science, and social studies .  Provided transportation end field trips .  Prov ided academic and good behavior incentives.  Provided transportation conferences. Third grade ~tudents mastered reading end math on the HPT. At the sixth grade level in all areas but science and language arts were mastered on the HPT. A growth in the nurber of black males passing MPT was shown at the third grade level. At the sixth grade level a growth fn science, language arts, and social studies for black males was shown. An increase fn the nurt\u0026gt;er of students scodng et the 50th percentile or above on Stanford 8 was shown, and there hes been a ~rease fn the nurt\u0026gt;er of s suspensions and students. Obstacl~s to Goal Attafrmont APIG Summry Report - School ___P :.,:u._,l.,o\"'sk::.l'--\"He,._i\"'g\"'h-\"ts....,_E.,_1-=\"'n\"'ta\"'r-'y_ ________ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. To f ncrease academf c ach f evement for oil students. Grode 3 HPT doto reflected mostery (88X) In reading, Consul tents, materials, and stipends were provided to all 1991 90X (91) moth. Grade 6 data reflected mastery In 2 of staff members to motivate and train in the areas of whole 2. To reduce the disparities fn academic achfevement the 5 subject arees. language and \\lrftfng Across the Curriculun. tnstructlonal am:::,ng groups formed on the bas is of race, gender. and equipment, camcorder, projectors, l fstening centers, etc. economic status. were purchased to support areas of learning. 1991- 1. To increase academic achievement for all studc!nts. Grode 3 HPT doto reflected 95X In reading, 90X math. Staff developnent continued fn the areas of reading and 1992 Grade 6 data reflected mastery in 1 of the 5 content. whole languege. Twenty-five black females, 45 bleck 2. To reduce the disparities fn acadenlfc achievement Stanford 8 data reflected grades 2 and 3 above the 50 males, 9 white males, and 8 white females participate fn a among groups formed on the basts of race, gender, and NCE. tutoring gr~. Niinerous trade books and magazines fn the economic status. content areas were purchased to support the goals. 1992- 1. To increase acadenlic achievement for all students. Grode 3 HPT data reflected 56X mastery In reading and Three teachers, one aide, snacks, transportation, and 1993 88X In .. th. Grade 6 data reflected mastery f n 2 of materials were ft.rded to the after-school tutoring program 2. To reduce the disparities fn academic achievement the 5 content areas. Stanford 8 data reflected grades for 60 days, 1 1/2 hours. among groups fonned on the basis of race, gerder, end 1, 3, and 4 above the 50 NCE. economl c status . SlfflMry Statement The Pulaski Heights ElfflNffitary staff successfully used the APIG to lrrplement strong staff devel9ffl!fflt programs ard to purchase materfal1 1 egufpnent, program guides, ard other essffltfal elements needed for the fnplementatfon of the program. Progress was made fn sane areas of achfevefflent. Obstacles to Goal Att  frment Dete was not reported on the tutoring 9rou,s to track progress of frdfvfciJals. A change in prfncfpels occurred d.Jrlng thfs tfme perfod. A.PIG S1.mnery R~rt - School __ .:,.Rom=i\"'ne\"-------------- Year Goals Rosul ts EvalU8tion Criteria/Process 1990 1. NA 1991 2. Plan written but not l,plemented. Delayed to 1991   -  -- ----- 92 school year . 1991  1. To raise the academic success of all students. It ls noted that the Stanford and AMPT results 1. Uni ts of stl.Kfy targeted to reach areas rated low on 1992 reflected acedemfc progress fn all areas . the MAT-6 and MPT. 2. To redlce th disparity among all Identified groups. 2. Provide specific program models for targeted atdsk. students. 1992- 1. To raise the academic success of all students. Stanford 8 test results as well as AMPT scores 1. Unites of stl.Kfy targeted to reach areas rated low on 1993 reflected increased academic success among studfflts the MAT -6 and MPT . along with the redlctlon of disparity emong all 2. To redlce the disparity emong all Identified groups . ldentlfhble groups. 2. Provide specific program models for targeted at-risk students. Surmery Stat~t The fl.l'lds acquired through the APJG em1bled the staff to develop ll\"lits write program guides oorchase materials ard egufpnent, ard to provide ffeld trfps for enrichment. Thfs resulted fn the students having the opoortl.llfty to vlsualfze, interpret and process lnfonnetlon that would raise thef.- achievement level . Obstacles to Goal Attairment The delay fn fnplemented the gr-ant on an earl fer tfmel lne fn the 199091 school year- was an obstacle. Test scor-es sf nee 1991 tndfcate that academic pr-ogress was achieved. APIG SI.ITIMry Report School --'T\"e\"-r'-r._ ____________ _ Year Coals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. To increase ecademic achievement for all students. HPT test results in 3rd and 6th grades reflected en Thematic 1.#lits were prepared to target all students' 1991 fncrease in achievement for black and white students. needs. Staff developnent schedule for all staff to 2. To reduce the disparities in academic achievement ilfl)rove teaching strategies. among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and economic status . 1991 - 1. To increase academic achievement for all students . Test results reflect a sfgni ff cant increase fn all test Staff developnent and fnservfces continued to be 1992 scores. one huidred percent C 100X) of black students conducted. Sevm professional training sessions were 2. To reduce the disparities fn academic achfevetl'N!nt in 6th grade passed the MPT in reading, math, language irrplemented: Wright Group, HCRAT, Reading and Writing among groups formed on the bas f s of race, gender, and arts, and social stt.dfes. Across the Curriculun, learning Styles, and science economic status . training. 1992- 1. To Increase academic achievement for all stl.dents. HPT test data reflects a contfr.Jed increase in Staff developnent ard fnservfce training contlrued fn 1993 achievement ard a reduction In disparity. Mastery in addition to the frrplementatfon of a strong fncmtfve 2. To reduce the dfsparitfes fn academic achievement all areas of the HPT occurred. program to inotfvate students and a perental involvement among groups formed on the bes la of race, gerder, and conmi tment. economic status. Sunnary Stattfflil!nt The APJC fl.rids provided professional training to the staff resulting in the Terry teachers being better prepared to reach a diverse student pop.,lation. The focus of the teaching methods and stratNJ\nes resulting from the ongoing staff developnMt produced teachers who were more confident and conpetent to ,nake decfsfons regardfng thefr students' teeming. Obstacles to Goel Atta\nrrnent No obstacles . Goals were ettefned at Terry. Terry was one of two area schools who pessl!'d all sections of the HPT test. APIG Sunnary Report - School ___ u\"\"a\"k\"\"e-'-f\"'ie\"l\"d ______________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Crf ter i a/Process 1990- 1_ To increase academic achievement for all students. MPT data reflected 8711: mastery In reading and 88X ,. Equfpnent and suppl fes were purchased for all 1991 mastery in math on the 3rd grade level for all grC\u0026gt;t.4\u0026gt;s cl ass rooms. 2- To reduce the disparities in academic achievement except black females (76%). among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and 2. Staff developnent in science ard social studies economic status. were scheduled to enhance teaching in grade 3. 1991 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. Data reflects all grades total below the 50 NCE on the ,. Additional instructional materials in science and 1992 Stanford 8. MPT reflects all students passing in grade social studies were purchased for classrooms. 2. To reduce the disparities In academic achievement 3 at 85X or above except black males (76X). Reading among groups formed on the basts of race. gender, end and math was passed In grade 6 by all studfflts. 2. F\nve-week tutoring sessions for et-risk students in economic status. grades 36. 1992 ,. To increase academic achievement for all students. Data reflects all grade totals on the Stanford 8 below Science materials, staff development, professional 1993 the 50 NCE with lrrprovement In grades 1, 3, and 5. meetings, at-risk strategies to enhance teaching, parent 2. To reduce the disparities In ecadenfc achievement All students passed the 3rd grade MPT except black workshops and tutorial programs for selected Lnder among groups fonned on the bash of race, gender, and males (76%). Reading and 118th was passed In grade 6 by achievers. economic status. white males and females only. Black students passed by 2X. Surmary Stat8'1eflt The APIC ft.nds ~bled the school to: have staff developne:nt sessions by providing teacher stfJ)!ndsj purchase materials and eq.Jipnent\nprovide inc:Mtives for stud~ts\nand, f\u0026amp;.nd snacks and transportation for the students Involved fn the tutoring sessions. The school acquired exceptional Mrlchment materials and egul~t that enhanced both the nusfc program and library collection. Obstacles to Goal Attefrrnent No measurable data wu malntaf~ as to the success ff the selected U'lder achievers who attended the tutorial program. Year 1992- 1993 Sunnary Statement APJG SUIINlry Rport  School Uash\nngton Magnet Goals 1. To provide a weekly reader subscription to each student in the 1st through 6th grades 2. To in-.,rove the disparity in achievement in the HPT of sub-population a related by CRTH and NORM Referenced Tests. J . To hire five certified staff metrbers to assist Twin City Bank e,rployees, to staff the After School Homework Center. Results Evaluation Criteda/Process  Since we began the program In March, we do not have 1. CRTH Tests coq\u0026gt;arison data from standardized testing. However, students look forward to getting their Ueekly Readers 2. Stanford 8 and parent and teacher conments were positive. Eightr ftve percent of the teachers requested Ueekly Readers 3. Increased reading fn the content area for th 1993 94 school Yr.  Since we were I.Xl8ble to get certified people to assist volunteers I.Xltil Harch, the results  re yet to be known. 4. The program was designed to assist students, who would not receive help at home, with their homework. In March, the PTA matched fl.n'.fs to hire certified staff. 5. AHPT Test Results 4. Eighty-five percent of  tl 3rd graders will pass  3rd Grade: Reading  90X the reading sections of the Arkansas Hinfnun Performence Hath  93X Test. * 6th Grode: Reed Ing  84X Moth  98X language Arts  82% set enc  90X Sociol Studt  83X  Ont y one student df d not show progress according to the EPSF post test. Several students  re now working on grode levl.  Second grade had posftfve growth fn all areas tested xcept one (concept N..-rs).  Fffth grade had posftfve growth fn ell areas tested cept one (Math C\"\"\"tat ton). 6. Interim Reports 7. EPSF Post tests 8. Stanford 8 was given to select second and fffth grede in Aprfl and then agotn in July. the Weekly Reeder Pr29ran1 fs a way of gettfng all of our st~ts to read about current events, They reed in the classroom and took their weekly readers home, hopefully, to reread. Thfa wfll Increase reeding skills and fflllke st~t more aware of current events fn the world and event  close to home. The Homework Center has the posstbflfty to be viable force fn test scores fn our low abflfty chfldren. \\lfth more tfme, and voh.r,teers who are becoming better trafned this program wfll show results fn the spring 9tandardfted testing, AHPT THt Results: Classes were well attended and parents co-operated with the teachera. Teacher  worked on skfl ls not iriestered based on assessments given by the ctassrom teachers, APIG S\u0026lt;mMry Report School _ _,:11,,_at,.,sc,,on,_,_ _______________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990 ,. To increase academic achievement for all stu::::tents . Test scores reflected increased achievement of all ,. To provide staff developed in whole language, 1991 students and decrease dfsparftfes in the 6th grade. cooperative learning, classroom management and learning centers. 2. To reduce the disparities fn academic achievetrent 2. Ten faculty meetings devoted to the training of among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and management of an integrated curriculun. economic status. 1991 1. To increase academic achievement for ell students . Teachers used checkl lsts to monf tor student 1. To target m. of the 1st graders below grade 1992 participation and to evaluate students' work. Test instructional level. The \\Jrite-to-Read corrp.,ter program 2. To rtuce the disperftfes fn academic achievement scores reflect an increase in academic achievement. will be partially purchased. among gr0l4)5 formed on the basis of race, gender, and economic status. 1992 1. To Increase academic achievement for ill students. Test scores reflect an increase in academic ,. The final purchase of the materials for the \\lriteto 1993 achievement. Read labs was made. 2. To reduce the disparities fn acedemfc achievement arrong groups formed on the basts of race, gender, and economic status. SLITl'Nlry Statement The fuids received from the APIG were used to support the focus of the school's plan .. the p.,rchese of the WrftetoRead conputers and materials. In conjl.XlCtion to this major purchase the other experdl tures were targeted to staff ~velopnt!nt science materials, end st.g\u0026gt;lementel readers. Obstacles to Coal Att  irmMt None Washington Magnet Page 2 CRTH and NORM Referenced Test: The kindergarten class was very successful. Host students irrproved on EPSF skills and are currently functioning on grade level. Two students ere being monitored for possible interventions. j. '\u0026gt;~lcrt n.nibi:-r of c\nwdentc, frl'.lfn c\nec.:iM\ninrl fifth or.:ides attended a sUTmCr program at Uashington. Classes focus~ on reading and math skills. At the conclusion of the class, all students were administered thl! Stanford 8 for l\"eading 11nd math. Scores wi?re canpared with the students' April Stanford 8 scores and growth was charted. As was noted each grade had only one negative growth area . 1n second grade, the high~st growth area was in reading vocabulal\"y with a 17.5 NCE gain. The fifth grade greatest gain came in reading conprehension with an 8.1 NCE gain. Obstacles to Goal Attairrnent The Ueekly Reader Program: our biggest obstacle was getting the readers on tin.! and fn getting the correct rM..mber we needed for each grade level. The Homework Center: The loss of voll.11teers from the bank and/or loss of PTA matching funds will cause a drop fn projected scores. AHPT Test Results: Ineffective sfx grade teachers  one class had four teachers the ffrst nfne weeks due to the little Rock School District's decision to put the classroom teachers back into the G/T programs. Thfs class never got back on track. The teacher resigned durfng the fourth nine weeks. CRTH and NORM Reference Tests: One student missed the first weelc of school. APIG S\"\"\"8ry Report School ---'ll\"'e\"'s'-'t.,_e'-'rn~H-'-1'-'ll..,,s,__ ___________ _ Year Goals Results Evaluation Cdterh/ Process 1990 ,. To increase academic achievement for all students. The HPT scores In 3rd grade reflect that 86% black ,. Materials were purchased to enhance teaching In all 1991 moles end 100% black females passed. One hLndred areas. percent (100%) white moles end females passed. The 2. To reduce the dfsparlties in academic achievement disparity showed a reduction. 2. Homework centers were established and peer tutoring among groups formed on the bas Is of race, gender, and groups were identified. economic status. 1991 ,. To increase academic achievement for all students. Test data reflected that grades 1, 2, 3, and 6 scored ,. Materials for 171.Jlticultural lessons, microscopes, 1992 above the 50 NCE on the Stanford 8. Ninety-three encyclopedias, research materials for all classes, and percent (93%) black males end 100% black females math coq:,uter software contirued to be purchased for all passed. One hLndred percent (100%) white moles end classes. females passed on the 3rd grade HPT. 2. To reduc: th dfsparftlu In academic echlvemont 2. School-wide incentives for academic and behavior among gr~ fonned on the bash of race, gender, and achievement were pur-chased. economf c  tat us. 1992 ,. To fncr-ease academic achievement for all students. Test data reflected that grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 scor-ed ,. Materials for- social studies providing 11Geo-Safer-i 11 1993 above th 50 NCE on th Stanford a. One hLndred centers for each classr-oom will be provided to teachers in per-cent (100%) black 3r-d grade males passed the MPT. need of social studies riaterfals. Also, teacher-a observed better behavior and fewer sent 2. To reduce the disparities fn academic achievement homes. 2. Thirty (30) etrfsk stu:lents wero targeted to monitor among grOt..pS formed on the be1t1 of race, gender, and the self-esteem COffl)()llfflt. econonifc status. SU'TINlry Statement The grant was focussed on building students' self esteeffl fn order- to inprove academical Ly and to fflhance teaching through the purchase of materials in all the areas of learning. Exmples: The 0lsabflfty Awareness Series for Spfal Education, Souids of Language by Bfll Martin for K-3 grades, overhead projectors, math manfpulatlves vid~ tapes science kits and nunerous manipulatives. Obstecls to Goel AttalrfflMt Additional data consfsting of students' names and observable m:ogress fn the areas of pttr tutoring, homework center attendance, and the set f-esteem conponents was not reported. APIG Sum,ary Report - School ___ W:.i,_,l\"'s\"'on\"'----------------- Year Goals Results Evaluation Criteria/Process 1990- 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. Test data reflected a decl fne in the 3rd grade HPT  Afternoon COl1l)Uter and phonics programs for students 1991 scores over the 1989-90 scores. Grade 6 HPT scores 2 times per week. 2. To reduce the disparities in academic achievement reflKt~ mastery In reading and math. among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, economic status. and  Incentive program for set f  esteem. . Increased parent involvement to support at - risk students. 1991- 1. To increase academk achievement for all students. Significant i rrprovement in 3rd grade HPT scores in  Materials to support the academics were purchased: 1992 1992: reading, 95X with all groups achieving 85X or science charts, heart models, solar systffl'IS, etc. 2. To rKfuce the disparities fn academic achievement above\nmath, 87X with all groups except black males. among groups formed on the basfs of race, gender, and Sfxth grade mastery fn reading and math for ill groups.  Parents were provided packets throughout the year to economic status. No fq::,rovement f n other areas. help their children.  Nfne teachers provided after-school tutoring to students. 1992- 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. HPT In Jrd grade reading reflects mastery (88%) and a Equfpnent purchases to enhance teaching were made: 1993 decl fne in math- MPT f n 6th grade - no mastery f n any recorders, listening centers, overhead projectors, and 2_ To reduce the disparftfes in academic achievement areas. eddftfonal science lab pieces. emong groups formed on the bash of race, gender, and economic status. Sl.lffMry Stat~t Test data does not reflect a steedy growth of fnprov~nt fn the u\n,per grades. The ffll!lterfals and eguipnent purchased were a nttdt asset to the school's program. Staff developnent appeared to be a Q!Slected area that needs to be addressed ff student achievement h to be acconplished. Obstacles to Goal Attai~nt The lack of plamed staff developnent sessions is a deffnfte obstacle to student achievement. Data not reported on the targeted students prevents success Interpretation. APIG Sunnary Report School ___ll ~ood=~ru~f~f_ _______________ Year Goals Evaluation Results 1990 ,. To f ncrease acedemf c ach f evement for all students. Staff developni!nt with IN!lterfals was provided for all Data fran the HAT6 tests reflected that disperfty end 1991 staff. El even teachers tutored 104 students f n grades achievement increased. The percent of black students 2. To reduce the disperitfes fn academic achievement 26 who were targeted as hfgh risk for future failure. at/above grade level increased from 31X to 39X. The among groups fanned on the basis of race, gender, and percent of white students at/above grade level increased economic status. from 49% to 67%. The dfsperity widened by 10X. 1991 ,. To increase academic achievement for all students. Six sessions of staff developnent end stipends provided Data from Stanford 8 reflected that fn all grade levels 1992 to all staff members. Enrichment experiences were NCE scores f ncreased. On the 3rd grade MPT, 100X of the 2. To reduce the dfsparitfes fn academic achievement provided to all students. Targeted groups of students black. males passed reading (an increase of 33X over 1991). among groups fonned on the bas ts of race, gerder, and were scheduled for after school tutoring with snacks Twelve percent (12X) fewer black females pessed reeding. economic status. and transportation provided. 1992 ,. To increase academic achievement for  l l students. Teachers end aides atterded 5 sessions In staff Stanford thinking skfl ls scores Increase fn grades 36 by 1993 deve l opnent. The c01.nSelor worked with targeted high over 10 NCE points. Disparity of scores on the 6th grade 2. To reduce the disparities In acedenic achievement risk students In grades 16 for 1 1/2 hours dally after MPT were el imfnated. Only one black female end one white among gr0l4)5 formed on the bash of race, gender, and school fn addftfon to the ongoing tutoring sessions. male failed to pass ell five sections of the test. economic status. S1.mn11ry Statement The Uoodruff staff developnent progrern5 were well planned that the tutoring classes were well orgenhed fn that they targeted the students In need. The total staff was Involved fn the excellent teBftl delivery of the programs. Even though fl.ndfng was late fn coming, the success of \\locxfruff'  total teant approach In workfng wfth students hes been exenplery. Obstacles to Goal Attalrment ate fend! ACADEMIC PROGRESS INCENTIVE GRANT (APIG} PROGRAM EVALUATION SECONDARY SCHOOLS Program Description Purpose The purpose of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant was to provide funding beyond the regular budget to all area schools in assisting them to increase academic achievement and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Principals and their committees were to submit a proposal and budget sheet in requesting the grant. Scope and Content The Academic Progress Incentive Grant described in the Desegregation Plan was first made available to each area school principal in 1990-91 in the sum of $25,000. In the following two years, additional sums were made available - $25,000 in 1991-92 and $10,000 in 1992-93. The process to be followed was for each school principal and school committee to write a proposal. A budget sheet identifying items and cost as related to the proposal being submitted was to be attached. The plan utilizing the grant money was to be directly connected to and supportive of the school's annual school plan. The school plan was developed cooperatively by the principal and staff with parent committee input yearly. Each grant proposal was forwarded to the Academic Progress Incentive Grant Committee for review. Upon approval, the budget sheet from the proposal was forwarded to the Financial Services Department and budget codes were then set up for the individual school to use for the purchasing of items requested in the proposal. Items requested by the school were typed on requisitions and forwarded to the assistant superintendent who supervised the particular area school The Academic Progress Incentive Grant was then checked to make sure that the requisitions supported the goals of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant program: to improve the education of all students and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. Participants/Beneficiaries The Academic Progress Incentive Grants in the secondary area schools served both entire student bodies in some cases and identified groups in others. In the four restructured junior high schools, Cloverdale, Forest Heights, Pulaski Heights, and Southwest, one joint proposal was submitted, serving the entire student body. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 2 Mabe/vale also submitted a proposal that served the entire student body. At the high school level, J.A. Fair presented a proposal that served all students, while both Hall and Central proposed to serve an identified group of students. At Central the focus was on remediating core area skills among at-risk students. At Hall average to above average stud en ts were served, developing their leadership and academic skills to serve as models for their peers. Program Goal The purpose of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant was to provide additional funds to the principals of the little Rock School District area schools who submitted proposals indicating plans: 1. To increase academic achievement for all students. 2. To reduce disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. The Academic Progress Incentive Grant was to be offered to the principals of the areas schools each year for a period of three years (1990-93). At the conclusion of that time period, a three-year summary would be submitted (Desegregation Plan, page 82) in order to evaluate its continuance. The two goals of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant along with specific objectives to have been accomplished to assist in the implementation of these goals are as follows: Obiective One: To increase the academic achievement for identified students in the core curricular areas by providing teachers with a broad base of resources and equipment. Obiective Two: To provide varied enrichment activities that would broaden identified students' experience base. Obiective Three: To involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for identified students' growth and success. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 3 Obiective Four: To provide staff development activities which meet the specific needs of identified students. Evaluation Criteria The summary report of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant has been evaluated by data analysis from the years 1990-93, specifically the evaluation will consist of: 1. Sufficient resources and materials were provided for teachers to increase the academic achievement for identified students in the core curriculum areas. 2. Enrichment activities were provided to identified students to broaden their experience base. 3. Parents were involved with school staff in working together to increase academic achievement and in reducing the disparity of identified students. 4. Staff development was provided to raise staff awareness/expectations of identified students. Evaluation Results Evaluation results reflect information submitted by area school principals at the end of the three years initial funding cycle for the Academic Progress Incentive Grants. Obiective One: To increase academic achievement for identified students in the core curricula areas by providing teachers with a broad base of awareness and equipment. Discussion During the Academic Progress Incentive Grant period, 1990-1993, sufficient resources and materials were provided to the area secondary schools who participated to increase student achievement and reduce disparities in numerous schools. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 4 For the 1990-91 Academic Progress Incentive Grant period, six schools reported increases in achievement, and five schools reported reduction in disparity. Seven of the eligible schools participated in the 1990-91 grant period. For the 1991-92 Academic Progress Incentive Grant period, six schools reported increases in achievement, and six schools reported reduction in disparity. Eight of the eligible schools participated in the 1991-92 grant period. For the 1992-93 Academic Progress Incentive Grant period, six schools reported increases in achievement, and four schools reported reduction in disparity. Six of the eligible schools participated in the 1992-93 grant period. Obiective Two: To provide varied enrichment activities that would broaden identified students' experience base. Discussion The four restructured junior high schools participated in a joint proposal that involved common program components The enrichment activities included a seventh grade orientation program, easing the transition from grade six to seven\nand an after school program which included tutorial opportunities, extended learning opportunities, nutritional snacks, high interest cultural enrichment activities, a homework center, and transportation. In the other participating junior high, tutoring and field trips enriched the core curriculum each quarter. Additional study carrels, tape players and head phones were provided in classrooms. An intramural sports program and an academic and behavioral incentive program also added to the enrichment of the students' experiences. The three participating high schools also provided varied enrichment experiences during the Academic Progress Incentive Grant period to broaden the student's experiences. Enrichment experiences in the high schools included tutorial programs after school and on Saturdays, leadership development sessions, sessions designed to teach behaviors consistently displayed by high achieving students, activities to enhance self esteem of program participants, academic coaching sessions, exposure to community resource speakers, and sessions designed to establish successful relations with teachers of the participants. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 5 Additional enrichment experiences at the high school levels were provided through the additions of computer hardware and software, multi cultural reading materials, audio visual equipment, scientific equipment, and musical equipment. Obiective Three: To involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for identified students' growth and success. Discussion The degree of attainment of objective three is not reported in some of the reports submitted at the end of the initial three year funding cycle for Academic Progress Incentive Grants. The restructured schools report the participation by parents in the orientation program each year was quite high, with most of the 65-75% of the students participating being accompanied by a parent. The report also mentions that parents were invited to attend other programs and academic sessions. One of the high school proposals involved a parental component. This program was designed to inform parents about the program their students were participating in, to seek their comments about changes in behavior and attitudes evident among program participants, to seek suggestions for program modifications, and to provide program evaluations for future planning. These parental involvement sessions were held each year of the three year funding cycle in the participating high school. Obiective four: To provide staff development activities which meet the specific needs of identified students. Discussion The degree of attainment of objective four is not identified in many of the reports submitted by the areas schools at the end of the initial three year funding cycle for the Academic Progress Incentive Grant. Those reporting staff development activities included sessions to enhance classroom discipline, self esteem, critical thinking, and sessions explaining the expectations for the grant proposal. Other experiences included sessions on the roles of program mentors, how to provide academic and behavioral coaching, the development of testtaking strategies, and future planning sessions. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 6 Obstacles to Goal Attainment The goals of increasing academic achievement for all students and the reduction of disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups were only partially attained during the initial funding cycle for the Academic Progress Incentive Grant. Obstacles to goal attainment included the following: 1. Funding for the Academic Progress Incentive Grant was approved near December of each of the funding years, allowing for implementation during only the second semester of each funding year. 2. Funding levels were reduced from $25,000 to $10,000 for the 1992-93 Academic Progress Incentive Grant. 3. At the secondary level the majority of the impact of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant has been in directed assistance to the development of identified students in programs after the regular school day ends. Such an arrangement limits availability of students for program participation due to extra curricular activities, family responsibilities, and employment of students. 4. Three to five hours weekly for eighteen weeks is not sufficient time to bring about the necessary academic improvement to offset the disparity in achievement levels. 5. The lack of consistency in the collection of formative and summative data, and in the analysis of said data, hamper the ability of researchers to draw uniform conclusions about the effectiveness of programming under the Academic Progress Incentive Grant. 6. There is a need in some instances to show a more direct relationship between the strategies employed in a proposal and the attainment of the proposal goals under the Academic Progress Incentive Grant. 7. Availability of parents for the planning and evaluations of Academic Progress Incentive Grants is limited at the secondary level. Recommendations 1. Continue funding the Academic Progress Incentive Grant in those area schools meeting stringent approval criteria. APIG Program Evaluation for Secondary Schools page 7 2. Make funds available in September of funding years so to extend the impact time. 3. Increase the funding level to original levels. 4. Require documentation of impact on goals by proposed strategies. 5. Require consistency in the collection of formative and summative data, and the analysis of said data, to enable uniform conclusions to be drawn about program effectiveness. APIG Summary Report School -Central YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1990-91 1. To provide remediation to students 1. Failure rate was reduced from 834 to 322 1. Changes in failure rates were who are performing at or below grade after the grant was received. The A and 8 calculated. Changes in honor roll level. honor roll increased by 259. Teachers participation were calculated. Changes involved as tutors reported program in grades of program participants were participants improved performance in deficit calculated. areas by at least one grade in most cases. 2. To provide reinforcement to students who desire assistance with emphasis on time on task. 3. To provide enrichment for students who desire advanced instructional assistance. I YEAR 1991-92 1992-93 GOALS 1. To provide remediation to students who are performing at or below grade level. 1. To provide remediation to students who are performaing at or below grade level. APIG Summary Report RESULTS 1. 100 students came in one or more days for help in English. 69 students came in one or more days for help in math. 53 students came in one or more days for science. 56 students came in one or more days for social studies. No data are available on results. 1. One hundred twenty-five students participated. No data are available on the results. School - Central -page 2 EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. The number of students seeking assistance in the core areas was recorded. 1. The number of students seeking assistance was recorded. YEAR 1991-92 GOALS 1. Purchase computer to improve reading comprehension, improve vocabulary, develop independent learning skills, remediate learning, improve problem solving and critical thinking skills of students in the four core areas. 2. Reduce achievement disparity in standardized test scores. APIG Summary Report RESULTS 1. Stanford Eight scores comparison of 92 Spring scores with 93 Spring scores showed an increase in the areas of total reading and math. Total reading in 92 was 37 and was 39 in Spring 93 for the same students. Total math was 29 in Spring 92 and was 35 in Spring 93 for the same students. 2. Achievement disparity was reduced from Spring 92 levels in Spring 93. In Spring 92 the total battery scores for 10th grade was Black-28, White-58. (30) In Spring 93 the total battery scores for 11th grade was Black-31, White-56. (25) School - Fair EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. The Spring 92 scores on the standardized tests were compared with the same student's scores one year later, 1993. 2. The Spring 92 scores on the standardized tests were compared with the same student's scores one year later. YEAR 1990- 1991 GOALS 1. Reduction of achievement disparity among sub groups in the student population. 2. Increase the enrollment of African American students in academic clubs and honor societies\nestablish mini grants for innovative instructional strategies\nestablish Project Promotion, a mentoring experience. 3. Improve academic performance in the core curricular areas. APIG SUMMARY REPORT RESULTS 1. Achievement test disparity was not positively impacted during the 1990-91 school year. 2. There was an increase in participation among African American students in the academic clubs and honor societies due to recruitment efforts. Mini grants were offered but none were funded during the 1990-91 school year. Project Promotion, a mentoring experience, was begun. 3. There was not an evident increase in academic performance among program participants sufficient to declare the program a success. Thirty-nine percent of the program participants increased their academic performance by maintaining or increasing their grade point average during program participation. SCHOOL - HALL EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. A comparison was made in the standardized test results of African American students and others for the 1990-91 school year. These results were compared with results of the same students from the previous year. The disparity in results was not reduced. 2. Membership levels of African American students in selected academic clubs and honor societies were compared to the membership level of previous years. Project Promotion was planned and implemented. 3. Grade point averages of program participants were compared to averages prior to program participation to determine if improvement was made. YEAR 1991-1992 GOALS 1. Reduction in achievement disparity among sub groups in the student population. 2. Increased academic performance of program participants. 3. Leadership sk,1ls and enhanced self esteem will emerge among program participants. APIG Summary Report RESULTS 1. Achievement test disparity was not positively impacted during the 1991-92 school year. 2. Forty- one percent of the program participants increased or maintained their grade point averages during program participation. Twenty-four percent improved or maintained their standardized test scores on the complete battery from 90-91 levels. 3. Enhanced leadership skills and self esteem were evident among progam participants. School - Hall- page 2 EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. A comparison was made in the standardized test results of African American students and others for the 1991-92 school year. These results were compared with results of the same students from the previous year. The disparity in results was not reduced. 2. Grade point averages of program participants were compared to averages prior to program participation to determine if improvemnt was made. A comparison of 91-92 standardized test scores of program participants was made to the complete battery from the previous year. 3. Enhanced leadership and self esteem was documented through self reports, reports of parents, and observations of mentors. YEAR 1992-93 GOALS 1. Reduction of achievement disparity among sub groups in the student population. 2. Increased academic performance of program participants. 3. leadership skills and enhanced self esteem will emerge among program participants. I APIG Summary Report RESULTS 1. Achievement test disparity was not positively impacted during the 1992-93 school year. 2. Forty-nine percent of the program participants increased or maintained their grade point average during program participation. 3. Enhanced leadership skills and self esteem were evident among program participants. School - Hall-page 3 EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. A comparision was made in the standardized test results of African American students and others for the 1992-93 school year. These results were compared with results of the same students from the previous year. 2. Grade point averages of program participants were compared to averages prior to program participation to determine if improvement was made. A comparison of 92-93 standardized test scores of program participants was made to their complete battery and/or basic battery scores. 3. Enhanced leadership and self esteem was documented throught self report, reports of parents, and observations of mentors. APIG Summary Report School - Cloverdale YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1990-91 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After School achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1991-92 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After School achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1992-93 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After school achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. - YEAR GOALS RESULTS 1990-91 EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic achievement. students who participated in the After School Program funded by the APIG scored APIG Summary Report School - Forest Heights significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1991-92 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic achievement. students who participated in the After School Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1992-93 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After school achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. APIG Summary Report School - Mabe/vale YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1990-91 1. Conduct an orientation session for 1. An orientations session was held. 1. Documented event. seventh grade students and their parents. 2. Provide an assignment notebook to 2. An assignment notebook was provided to 2. Documented receipt of materials. each student. each student. 3. Develop an incentive program to 3. An incentive progrma was instituted. No decrease disparity in disciplinary results on program impact were provided. sanctions and to promote academic excellence. 4. Institute an Alternative Classroom. 4. An Alternative Classroom was instituted. 4. Documentated operation of program. YEAR GOALS RESULTS 1991 -92 (cont.} 7. EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS Provide an assignment notebook to 7. An assignment notebook was provided 7. Documented receipt of materials all students. for each student. APIG Summary Report School - Mabe/vale-page 3 8. Provide a noon time recreational 8. An intramural program was developed 8. Documented operation of program program. and operated before school and at lunch period. 9. Add a laser printer to the computer 9. No results were recorded lab. APIG Summary Report School - Mabe/vale - page 2 YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1991-92 1. Implement a Student Health 1. No results were recorded. Assistance Program. 2. Provide staff development in 2. Staff develoment was provided for all 2. Documented results classroom management, classroom teachers in the areas of classroom discipline, discipline, self esteem, and thinking self esteem and critical thinking. skills. 3. Provide an outdoor classroom. 3. No results were recorded. 4. Provide a cassette tape player and 4. Study carrels and a tape player were 4. Documented receipt of equipment study carrel for each classroom. provided for each classroom. 5. Provide a large screen television for 5. No results were recorded. the media center. 6. Provide a computer printer and 6. No results were recorded. software to the In -School-Suspension Program. APIG Summary Report School - Pulaski Heights YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1990-91 1. Enhance studenr achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After School achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1991-92 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After School achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. 1992-93 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. The percentage of identified at-risk 1. Documented MPT pass rates reduce disparity in academic students who participated in the After school achievement. Program funded by the APIG scored significantly higher on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test when compared with those students in the total population. APIG Summary Report School - Southwest YEAR GOALS RESULTS EVALUATION CRITERIA/PROCESS 1990-91 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. An extended health education program 1. Not stated in report reduce achievement disparity. was provided. An increase in achievement is reported. 1991-92 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. Television equipment and computers were 1. Documentation of MPT pass rates reduce achievement disparity. purchased. A tutorial program was provided in core areas. Eighth grade students who remained in the program passed the MPT. 1992-93 1. Enhance student achievement and 1. learning strategies were taught to 1. Documentation of MPT pass rates reduce achievement disparity. students. Ninety percent of students enrolled in the after school program passed the MPT. A computer with software was purchased for each department. FAST TRACK EVALUATION SECTION TWO LIBRARY /MEDIA PROGRAM January 1994 To: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY - IRC 600 SOUTH RINGO LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 January 4, 1994 Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent RECEIVED 'JAN O 3 1994 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT From: ,St-Lucy Lyon, Coordinator of Instructional Technology Subject: Fast Track Evaluation for Library Media Program Attached is the revised fast track evaluation of the library media program that includes the addition of a conclusion as the committee requested. Please let me know of any other requested changes. Purpose LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description The Library Media Program supports the instructional program of the District by providing a full measure of varied instructional resources and by extending and enriching basic skills that are taught in the classroom. A variety of teaching/learning strategies are presented to students through library media center activities designed to meet a wide range of student needs. Scope and Content All elementary schools implemented the new library/media program for the District in the 1989- 90 school year. Known as REACH (Reading Extension Activities for Children), the program was based on a study done in 1988 by Retta Patrick, library n\niedia consultant, and was modeled on the Pulaski County Special School District's nationally-recognized library media program. The 1988 study showed that there were several barriers limiting the effectiveness of the District's library media program. The new program was designed to address those barriers while presenting a plan for library media services that would meet the needs of students and teachers. Additionally, the new program was to following state and national guidelines for high quality library media programs. One of the barriers limiting the effectiveness of the library media program in 1988 was the lack of reference material, books, and other resources that support the curriculum. Another resource deemed inadequate was the availability of properly working audiovisual equipment. To address these barriers a system was established for adding instructional resources to each elementary school and for efficiently repairing audiovisual equipment. Another barrier identified in 1988 was the lack of a structured, uniform, curriculum-integrated library media program. In the spring of 1989 a library media curriculum correlated to the District's reading series was developed by a team of elementary library media specialists (and one principal). The REACH curriculum sequentially presents skills for locating, using, synthesizing, and communicating information. from kindergarten through sixth level. Literary skills, introduced by the classroom teacher, are extended. Children are encouraged to read a variety of literature types, improving reading proficiency through practice. A small group approach is used and planned instruction by the library media specialist is directly related to previous classroom learning by students. The REACH curriculum was implemented in the fall of 1989 and continued to be the basic library/media curriculum until the District's revised curriculum was implemented in 1992-93. The District's revised curriculum allows teachers to use many other resources to teach reading Library Media Page 2 besides the basal text and emphasizes a thematic, integrated approach. Each library/media specialist, working with teachers in the building, has developed library/media instruction that correlates to various subject areas of the curriculum, including science, social studies, and mathematics. Library and information skills are now reinforced and extended through all subject areas. Guidelines of the American Association of School Librarians strongly recommend the concept of flexible scheduling in school library media programs. Scheduling classes flexibly allows for individuals, groups and classes to use the library at the point of need, not on a rigid schedule. In t~e first two years of the library media program, library media instruction was scheduled according to stories read in the basal reader. With the adoption of the revised curriculum library media instruction is now scheduled by half-classes in most schools to provide for hands-on experience with the many and varied library resources available. Time is available for flexible scheduling of classes in addition to a regular library time as teachers and library media specialists plan for additional reinforcing activities. Another component of the library media program is access to the library media center at the point of need. That is, students are not limited in library visits only to a scheduled class time. The library media center is available for individuals or small groups of students who need resources and information at any time in the school day. In order for the library media program to function successfully, appropriate staffing must be in place. Each elementary library media center is staffed by a full-time certified library media specialist. Each elementary library has at least part-time clerical support in the form of a library media clerk. Larger schools have a full-time clerk. Having a library clerk enables the library media specialjst to have more time for planning with teachers, instructing students, and determining needs for instructional materials for teachers and students. The many clerical tasks that must be done to maintain and promote library collections are best handled by a library media clerk, freeing the library media specialist to perform instructional duties. Program Goal The goal of the library media program is to provide each student with library/media services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the District's Desegregation Plan. Specific objectives have been developed to implement that goal: l. To provide equitable access to library resources, including multicultural and audiovisual resources for all students 2. To extend and enrich basic skills in ways that meet students varied learning styles Library Media Page 3 Evaluation Criteria The library/media program will be evaluated by comparing data from the beginning of the program through the fall of 1993. Specifically the evaluation will consist of: 1. A comparison of results of surveys administered to classroom teachers in 1988 and again in 1993 that will show: 1.1 Three-fifths instead of one-fourth of the teachers will consider themselves frequent users of the school library. 1.2 Students will have access at the point of need. 1.3 Only 1 of 10 students instead of 4 out of 10 will indicate that they seldom or never go to the library to use the library/media center materials for a class assignment. 1.4 Only 1/5 instead of 1/2 of the teachers will report that they rarely or never planned learning activities involving library media activities or skill instruction. 1.5 Major barriers or constraints noted in the spring 1988 survey will not repeat as major stumbling blocks to the program. 2. A comparison of data collected monthly that will show: 2.1 Student visits will increase. 2.2 Volume of books checked out will increase. 2.3 Indep~ndent research by students will increase. 2.4 Number of classes/groups of students scheduled in the library by teachers will increase. Evaluation Results Evaluation results reflect data collected from administration of the two library media surveys and from an analysis of monthly report data collected from each elementary school from the 1989-90 school year to the 1992-93 school year. Results are presented by objective of the program. Library Media Page 4 Objective 1: To provide equitable access to library resources, including multicultural and audiovisual resources for all students The library media survey was administered to elementary teachers in 1988 with 715 teachers responding and again in 1993 with 680 teachers responding. The results are presented for each of the evaluation criteria. A full comparison of the two surveys is presented in Appendix A. 1.1 Three-fifths instead of one-fourth of the teachers will consider themselves frequent users of lhe school library. (Survey Item #1) I Teachers use the library .... I 1988 I 1993 I Several times a week 26% 42% Once a week/ several times month 54% 47% Once month I once a semester 19% 9% Never use it 2% 0% Discussion In 1993 approximately two-fifths (42 % ) of the teachers surveyed considered themselves frequent users of the library instead of approximately one-fourth (26%) in 1988. There was a sixteen point increase in the number of teachers who are frequent users, and there was a decrease in the number of teachers who rarely or never use the library from 21 % down to 9 % . There was an increase in the number of teachers who use the library, but that increase did not reach the criteria of three-fifths. 1.2 Students will have access at the point of need. (Survey Item #6) Rating scale: A=Regularly B=Occasionally C=Rarely/Never D=Don't Know A B C D Students have access 88 93 88 93 88 93 88 93 throughout day, as needed 23% 47% 43% 33% 28% 14% 6% 8% Library Media Page 5 Discussion The number of students who do not have access to the school library throughout the school day decreased from 28 % to only 14 % , and the number of students who have regular access to the school library throughout the day as needed doubled (from 23 % to 47% ). Approximately one-half (47%) of elementary students do not have regular access to the school library throughout the day. 1. 3 Only 1 of 10 students instead of 4 out of 10 will indicate that they seldom o never go to the library to use the library/m~dia center materials for a classassignment. (Survey Item #7, #8) Rating scale: A=Regularly B=Occasionally C=Rarely/Never D=Don't Know A B C D Students go to library ... 88 93 88 93 88 93 88 93 full class 23% 27% 26% 36% 43% 31 % 8% 7% in small groups/ 16% 37% 36% 40% 41 % 18% 8% 6% as individuals Discussion As a full class three out of ten (31 % ) students seldom or never visit the library for a class assignment according to the 1993 survey, a decrease from four out of ten in 1988. Approximately two out of ten students (18%) seldom or never visit the library in small groups or as individuals for a class assignment in 1993. This was a decrease from four out of ten in 1988. While neither category reached the goal of one of ten, progress was made toward the goal of more library use by students. 1.4 Only 1/5 instead of 1/2 of the teachers will report that they rarely or never planned learning activities involving library media activities or skill instruction. (Survey Item #15) Library Media Page 6 Rating scale: A=Regularly B=Occasionally C=Rarely/Never D=Don't Know A B C 88 93 88 93 88 93 Teachers planning learning activities 14% 27% 44% 48% 40% 23% involving LM activities or LMC skills Discussion D 88 93 3% 2% In 1993 approximately 1/5 (23%) of the teachers reported that they rarely or never planned learning activities involving library media activities as opposed to almost 1/2 (40%) of the teachers in 1988. This criteria was met. 1.5 Major barriers or constraints noted in the spring 1988 survey will not repeat as major stumbling blocks to the program. Barrier or Constraint (# Responses) 1988 1993 Limited Resources - Books 101 33 Limited Resources - Audiovisual Equipment 67 25 Rigid Scheduling 51 2 Lack of Time 46 29 Limited space/lack of clerical staff 47 115 Absence of curriculum-integrated LM program 30 3 Discussion Only the barrier of limited space/lack of clerical staff increased in responses from 1988 to 1993. All other barriers decreased. While the barriers noted in 1988 were mentioned again in 1993, a dramatic drop in the number of teachers who listed them was apparent. Library Media Page 7 The lack of clerical staff was noted by the largest number of teachers responding to this question. Progress was made from 198E to 1993 in meeting the five criteria specified for this objective. One criteria (1.4) was fully met and the other four showed improvement. Objective 2: To extend and enrich basic skills in ways that meet students varied learning styles Data has been collected monthly from each elementary library since the 1989-90 school year. The four criteria of objective twq are evaluated on the results of that data. 2.1 Student visits will increase. Students visit the library for instruction, for research, fo\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1156","title":"Little Rock School District, personnel directories","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School administrators","School board members","School employees","School management and organization","School principals","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, personnel directories"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1156"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n1994 Personnel Directory LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AN ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION REPRESENTING THE INTERESTS OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S TEACHERS, CUSTODIANS, AIDESANDBUSDRIVERS \"OVER 25 YEARS OF OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO OUR MEMBERS\" LRCTA AEA NEA STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY 1500 West 4th Street, Suite 305 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-3519 Little Rock School District Administrative Directory 1994 Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Board of Directors Director Term ends Dr. Katherine Mitchell 1996 Shorter College 604 Locust Street, NLR, 72114 374-6305 T. Kevin O'Malley 1996 Ark. Board of Review Tower Building - Suite 700, 01 324-9038 Dorsey Jackson 1994 1400 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Avenue, 01 375-3275 John A. Riggs, IV 1996 J. A. Riggs Tractor Co. P. 0. Box 1399, 03 570-3528 Linda Pondexter 1996 Fuller Jr. High P. 0. Box 8601, 16 490-1503 Patricia Gee 1994 8409 Dowan Drive, 09 562-0571 Oma Jacovelli 1994 6622 Gold Court, 09 568-7585 Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2000 II LRSD Central Offices II All Plaxar Stations (228, 324, 455, 570, 671) can be called by dialing the last four-digit extension. For information call 324-2000. LOCATIONS LRSD Administration Building 810 W. Markham, 72201 Administration Annex 100 S. Arch, 72201 Adult Education 1401 Scott St., 72202 Alternative Learning Center 800 Apperson St., 72202 Cafeteria/Food Services 1501 Jonas, 72202 Instructional Resource Canter (IRC) 6th \u0026amp; Ringo, 72201 Computer Central Early Childhood Education English English Second Language Foreign Lenguagaa Instructional Madia Center Math PAC Reading Science Social Studiaa Staff Development Metropolitan Vo-Tech. Ed. Ctr. no1 Scott Hamilton Road, 72209 Plent Sarvicaa/Maintanance 3601 S. Bryant, 72204 Procurement \u0026amp; Material Management 1800 E. Sixth, 72202 Safety and Security 1001 E. 21 St., 72202 Student Assignment Offices 501 Sharmen, 72202 Transportation Dept. 5400 Murray, 72209 Quigley Stadium 2409 W. 14th, 72202 DEPARTMENTS Adult Education Pauletta Martin, Director Athletic Department Bualneaa Ed/Homa Economica CARE Program Martha Rogers, Supervisor Cafeteria/Food Services Jackie Boykin, Director Communications Department Jeanetta Wagner, Director Community Education Branda Scrimager 324-2000 324-2000 324-2260 324-2370 324-2250 324-0515 324-0517 324-0510 324-0510 324-0510 324-05n 324-0520 324-0525 324-0526 324--0518 324-0514 324-0500 565-8465 570-4020 324-2230 324-2400 324-2272 570-4000 324-2426 324-2260 324-2426 570-4043 324-2395 324-2250 324-2020 570-4149 Curriculum Daaagragatlon Dr. Ruaaell Mayo, Aaaoc. Superintendent Arma Hart, Desegregation Facilitator Deputy Superintendent Estella Matthla, Deputy Superintendent Sterling Ingram, Assoc. for Inst. to the Deputy Margaret Gremillion, Asst Supt. Elementary Larry S. Robertson, Asst. Supt.  Elementary Dr. Victor Anderson, Acting Asal. Supt. Secondary Early Childhood Education Pat Price, Coordinator English/Foreign Language/ESL Gane Parker, Supervisor Exceptional Children Gifted/Talented Mable Donaldson, Supervisor Spacial Education Dr. Patty Kohler, Director Family Ufa Education/N- Futuraa Rane Carson, Coordinator Federal Programa/Grents Leon Adams, Director Financial Sarvicaa 324-2010 324-2271 324-2109 324-2010 324-2124 324-2006 324-2007 671-6200 324-0517 324-0513 324-2194 324-2180 324-0518 324-2110 324-2078 Mark Milhollan, Controller Health Services Gwen Efird, RN, Coordinator HIPPY 324-2161 (baapar)569--0244 324-2266 Marian Shead, Supervisor Human Raaourcaa Dr. Richard Hurley, Director Robert Robinson, Recruiting Coordinator Information Sarvicaa John Ruffins, Interim Director Instructional Resource Canter Dannis Glasgow, Director Insurance Office KLRE/KUAR FM Regina Dean, Manager Labor Relations Brady Gadberry, Specialist Library/Instructional Tech Lucy Lyon, Coordinator Mathematica Judy Trowell, Supervisor Carmella Crawford, Specialist Kathy Danaahmandi, Specialist Shirley Harper, Specialist Docla Jonas, Specialist Trish Killingsworth, Specialist Ranee Kovach, Specialist New Futurea Linda Young, Liaison Parent Involvement Catherine J. Gill, Coordinator Parent Recruiters Troy Cole, Recruiter 324-2080 324-2086 324-2055 324-0518 324-2083 569-8485 324-2116 324-05n 324-0520 324-2112 324-0525 324-2286 Becky Rather, Recruiter Coordinator 324-2287 Ron Looper, Specialist 324-0500 Partne,. In Education 324-2297 Sue Walls, Specialist 324-0500 Debbie Milam, Coordinator Marian Woods, Specialist 324-0500 Planning, R-arch and Evaluation 324-2120 Student Assignment Office 324-2272 Dr. Robert Clowers, Director Julie Wiedower, Student Assignment Officer Plant Services/Maintenance 570-4020 Student Hearing 324-2169 Doug Eaton, Director Dr. Linda Watson, Officer Print Shop, Administration 324-2031 Substitute Office (SOS), 324-2091 Pupil Services/Drug Abuse Prevention 324-2162 Sue Rodgers, Coordinator Marcy Eckolls, Asst. Coordinator 324-2090 Jo Evelyn Elston, Director Student Records 324-2129 Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management 324-2230 Superintendent's Office 324-2100 Charles Neal, Director Dr. Henry P. Williama, Superintendent. 324-2012 Reading 324-0526 Supply Center 324-2237 Allee Stovall, Director Leonard Willis, Manager Resources and School Support 324-2009 Trade/Industrial Ed. 570-4044 Safety and Security 324-2400 Transportation Dept. 570-4000 Bill Barnhouse, Director Brad Montgomery, Director Science 324-0518 Truancy Reduction Center 671-6397 Dennis Glasgow, Supervisor Darold Maxfield, Coordinator Vocational/Tech. Ed. Center 570-4043 Scott Field 671-6299 Carol Green, Director Social Studies 324-0514 Vo-Tech Print Shop 570-4045 Marie A. McNaal, Supervisor 324-0511 Terry Kirkpatrick, Manager Staff Development 324-0500 Volunteers In Public Schools (VIPS) 324-2297 Donita Hudspeth, Director 324-0512 Debbie Milam, Coordinator Paula Grier, Specialist 324-0500 Administrative Staff Adams, Leon, Federal Programs Director ................... 324-2110 Browning, Benita, Fin. Sarv .......................................... 324-2069 Adams, Polly, Voe. Ed. Secy ........................................ 570-4043 Brumfield, Frank, IRC Security ..................................... 324-0526 Adams, Wayne, Facil. Coor ........................................... 570-4020 Cadman, Suzanne, Student Hearing Secy ................... 324-2169 Agnes, Jayna, Safety Supervisor, Transportation ..... 570-4000 Calhoun, Robert, Information Services ....................... 324-2106 Allan, Martha, Voe. Ed. Coun ........................................ 565-8465 Campbell, Sharon, Insurance Secretary ...................... 324-2083 Allison, Linda, HIPPY Aide ........................................... 324-2266 Caraway, Gwen, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management .324-2242 Anderson, John, Building Security Supervisor .......... 324-2400 Carpenter, Sharon, Deseg. Data Entry Operator ........ 324-2289 Armstead, Vicki, Communications Secy ..................... 324-2020 Carson, Rene, Family Life Coordinator ....................... 324-0518 Armstrong, Carol, Exec. Asst. Support Services ....... 324-2009 Carter, Ouida, Athletics Secy ....................................... 324-2426 Armstrong, Ramona, Labor Relations Sacy ................ 324-2116 Cash, Willard, Trans. Mach ........................................... 570-4005 Armstrong, Sheila, Food Sarv. Reimb. Coor ............... 324-2250 Cathey, Mary, Financial Services ................................. 324-2066 Baier, Keith, Trana. Mech .............................................. 570-4005 Chapman, Susan, Sp. Ed. Supv. CBI ........................... 324-2176 Banks, Roland, Fed. Prog. Chapter I Coordinator ..... 324-2110 Choate, Betsy, Information Services ........................... 324-2033 Barnhouse, Bill, Safety/Security Director ................... 324-2400 Claypool, Ruth, Financial Services .............................. 324-2075 Baua, Marjorie, Evaluation Specialist ........................ 324-2126 Cleek, Janacia, Financial Services ............................. 324-2065 Bates, Vera, Federal Programs .................................... 324-2110 Clowers, Robert, Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation ... 324-2120 8-d, Ken, FS Main. Tech ........................................... 324-2250 Cole, Troy, Parent Recruiter ......................................... 324-2286 Bennett, Paulina, Human Resources Secy ................ 324-2089 Connolly, Robert, Systems Development Mgr ............ 324-2058 Bannett, Tammy, Transportation Dept. Secy .............. 570-4000 Cooper, Floyd, Trans. Supv .......................................... 570-4004 Barkhan, Dan, Transportation, Shop Clerk ................. 570-4006 Corker, Sue, R ding .................................................... 324-0526 Bilal, B. J., Trana. Dispatch .......................................... 570-4012 Cox, Tanya, Fin. Sarv .................................................... 324-20n Blagg, Lynn, English/Foreign LangJESL Secy ........... 324-0510 Cranford, Joan, Fin. Sarv .............................................. 324-2068 Bonda, Michelle, Switchboard Oper ............................ 3242000 Crawford, Carmelia, Mathematics Specialist .............. 324-0520 Boykin, Jackie, Food Sar. Director .............................. 3242250 Crawford, Pam, Computers Spec ................................. 324-0515 Braden, Carutha, Federal Programs ............................ 3242110 Currin, Ladye C., Secretary, Pupil Services ................ 324-2162 Bramlette, Nancy, Information Services ...................... 324-2063 DanHhmandi, Kathy, Mathematics Specialist ........... 324-0520 Brant, Dennis, Compute,. Spec ................................... 324-0515 Davis, Johnnie, Trans. Mech ........................................ 570-4005 Bray, Shirley, Fin. Sarv .................................................. 324-2071 Dean, Regina, KLRE/KUAR Manager ........................... 569-8485 Brawer, Jerry, Trana. Mach ........................................... 570-4005 DeVore, Dana, Trans. Supervisor ................................. 570-4008 Broughton, Thomas, Psychological Examiner ........... 324-2174 Driver, Juanita, Fin. Serv .............................................. 324-2076 Brown, Paula, Visually Impaired Instructor ................ 324-2192 Donaldson, Mable, Gifted/Talented Supervisor .......... 324-2197 Brown, Willie, Adm. Bldg. Mgr ...................................... 324-2030 Dunbar, Ethel, Eval. Spec ............................................. 324-2123 Eans, Bonnie, Computer Specialist ............................. 324-0515 Jones, Robert, Safety and Security ............................. 324-2400 Eaton, Doug, Plant Services/Maint. Director ............... 570-4022 Jones, Wendy, Construction Secretary ....................... 570-4026 Eckolls, Marcy, SOS Ant. Coord ................................. 324-2090 Jordan, Brenda, Administration Custodian ................ 324-2030 Edwarda, Diane, Student Records ............................... 324-2129 Jordan, Trey, Trans. Mech . ........................................... 570-4005 Efird, Gwen, Health Serv. Coordinator ........................ 324-2161 Joyce, Lisa, Reading Secy ............................................ 324-0526 Ellis, Archie, Trans. Supv .............................................. 570-4001 Kelly, Doris, Pupil Services Secy ................................. 324-2162 Elston, Jo Evelyn, Pupil Services/Drug Abuse ........... 3242162 Kendall, Doug, Coord., Environmental Protection ..... 570-4026 Eubanks, Gail, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management. Supv. 324-2234 Kiilsg9!1rd, Sharon, Staff Dev. Secy ............................. 324-0500 Fells, Cedric, Trans. Mech ..... : ...................................... 570-4005 Killingsworth, Trish, Mathematics Specialist ............. 324-0520 Ferguson, Anne, Fam. Life/New Futures ..................... 324-0518 Knox, John, Food Serv. Warehouse Mgr .................... 324-2257 Forbes, Betty Jean, Staff Asst. ..................................... 324-2100 Kohler, Patty, Special Ed. Director .............................. 324-2190 Freeman, Ann, Science Specialist/New Futures ......... 324-0518 Korte, Paula, Special Education ................................... 3242193 Fry, Ben, KLRE/KUAR FM ............................................. 569-8485 Kovach, Renee, Mathematics Specialist ..................... 324-0520 Fulmer, Lena, Sp. Ed. Supv .......................................... 324-2183 land, Kitty, Purchase Order Entry Specialist ............. 324-2240 Furrer, Jean, Food Serv. Supv ..................................... 324-2250 Leidigh, Lynn, Computer Specialist ............................ 324-0515 Gadberry, Brady, labor Relations Dir ......................... 324-2116 Logan, Kelli, Division of Exceptional Children ........... 324-2193 Gardner, Gayle, Math Secy ........................................... 324-0520 Looper, Ron, Staff Development Specialist ................ 324-0500 Gentry, Ruthie, Student Assignment Office Mgr ........ 324-2271 Loudermilk, Terry, Trans. Mechanic ............................ 570-4005 Gill, Catherine, Parent Involvement Coordinator ....... 324-0525 Lucker, Liz, New Futures Social Worker ..................... 324-0518 Glasgow, Dennis,Science Coordinator ....................... 324-2011 Lyon, Lucy, Library Cood ............................................. 324-0577 Glenn, Randall, Special Ed ........................................... 324-2191 McCraw, Helen, Information Services ......................... 324-2059 Goodwin, Cassandra, Substance Abuse Cood ........... 324-2167 McIntyre, Nina, Psy. Exam ............................................ 324-2173 Goza, Jean, Financial Services .................................... 324-2074 McMullen, Lille, Psy. Exam ........................................... 324-2171 Grable, Hazel, FS Bookkeeper ...................................... 32422SO McNeal, Marie A., Soc. Studies Supervisor ................. 324-0511 Graves, Barbara, Sp. Ed ................................................ 324-2189 Martin, Paulette, Adult Eduction Director ................... 324-2260 Green, Carol, Vocational Director ................................ 570-4043 Matson, Lee Ann, VIPS .................................................. 324-2295 Green, Dorothy, Planning/Eva!. Secy ........................... 324-2120 Matthis, Estelle, Deputy Superintendent ..................... 324-2011 Gremillion, Margaret, Assist. Superintendent ............ 324-2006 Maxfield, Darold, Truancy Reduction Coordinator ..... 671-6399 Grier, Paula, Staff Development Specialist ................. 324-0500 Mayfield, Rhetta, Community Educ. Secretary ........... 570-4149 Griffin, Beverly, Planning/Eval. Secy .......................... 324-2124 Mayo, Russell, Associate Supt. Desegregation .......... 324-2271 Griffin, Robert, Supply Center Asst. Mgr ................... 324-2237 Milam, Debbie, VIPS Coordinator ................................. 324-2297 Hackler, Joan, Computer Specialist ............................. 324-0515 Milam, Judy, Reading .................................................... 324-0526 Hamilton, Deborah, Trans. Disp ................................... 570-4012 Milhollen, Mark, Controller ........................................... 324-2078 Harris, Curtis, Supply Center ....................................... 324-2237 Miller, Brenda, Student Assignment Asst . .................. 324-2272 Harris, Rhonda, Plant Services Secy ........................... 570-4022 Montgomery, Brad, Transportation Director ............... 570-4000 Hart, Arma, Desegregation Facilitator ......................... 324-2109 Moore, Avis, KLRE/KUAR FM ....................................... 569-8485 Hayes, Steve, Maint. Supv ............................................ 570-4020 Moore, Cathine, CARE Coor ......................................... 324-2395 Haygood, Angelia, Special Ed. Secy ............................ 324-2172 Moore, Muriel, Science Secy ........................................ 324-0518 Harper, Linda, Sp. Ed. Secy .......................................... 324-2181 Morgan, Nancy, Information Services ......................... 324-2057 Harper, Shirley, Mathematics Specialist.. .................... 324-0520 Mouton, Valina, Information Ser. Operations Mgr ...... 324-2064 Hill, Claudette, Psy. Test. Secy ................ : ................... 3242186 Murray, Fran, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management ....... 324-2231 Hobby, Dr. Selma, Eval. Spec ....................................... 3242128 Neal, Charles, Procurement Director ........................................... 324-2235 Hodges, Lela, VIPS ........................................................ 324-2291 Nebling, Brenda, KLRE Secretary ................................ 569-8485 Honorable, Maggie, Human Resources ....................... 324-2081 Newburn, Linda, Transportation Secretary ................. 570-4000 Huddle, Mary, Gifted Secretary .................................... 324-2194 Nichols, Joyce, Homebound Teacher .......................... 3242180 Hudson, Valerie, VIPS ................................................... 324-2292 Norris, Margaret, Homebound Teacher ....................... 324-2180 Hudspeth, Donita, Staff Development Director ........... 324-0S12 Norton, Faye, CARE ...................................................... 324-2395 Huffman, Kris, IRC ......................................................... 324-0526 O'Baugh, Randy, Asst. Warehouse Mgr ...................... 324-2257 Hurley, Dr. Rlchard,Human Resources Director ......... 324-2080 Odle, Vicki, Psy. Test Secy ........................................... 324-2182 Humbard, Melissa, Information Services Secy ........... 324-2055 Paradis, Darrel, Procurement Contracting Supv ............ 324-2238 Humphrey, Theresa, Deaeg. Data Entry Operator ...... 324-2288 Parker, Gene, English/Foreign langJESLSupv .......... 324-0513 Ingram, Sterling, Assoc. for Instruction to the Deputy ..... 324-2124 Paul, Annita, Family Life Ed ........................................... 324--0518 Jack, Lynda, Div. Exceptional Children ....................... 324-2179 Pederson, Sue, Deseg. Info. Mgmt. Coordinator ........ 324-2285 Jackson, Debbie, Information Services ....................... 324-2052 Penn-Norman, Kathy, Evaluation Specialist ............... 324-2127 Jackson, Larry, Supply Center ..................................... 324-2237 Perritt, Yoriko \"Lola\", Science Specialist .................... 324-0518 Jackson, Roy, Cust. Supv ............................................. 570-4024 Petty, Donna, Secretary, HIPPY ................................... 324-2266 Jacobs, Joyce, Sp. Ed. Secy ........................................ 324-2180 Phillips, Don, Trans. Dispatcher .................................. 570-4013 Jeffrey, Bonnie, Div. Exceptional Children ................. 3242185 Price, Pat, Early Childhood Coordinator ..................... 324-0517 Johnson, Jerry, Construction Manager ....................... 570-4026 Porter, Diann, Pay. Exam .............................................. 324-2184 Jones, Docia, Mathematics Specialist ......................... 324-0520 Putt, Paulette, Vocational Education ........................... 570-4044 Jones, Linda, Schools Secy ......................................... 324-2016 Quattlebaum, Larry, Psy. Exam .................................... 324-2195 Jones, Mike, OPS Manager, Transportation ............... 570-4000 Rather, Becky, Parent Recruiter Coordinator ............. 324-2287 Jones, Rita, Human Resources Secy ........................... 324-2082 Rector, Janet, Plant Serv. Budget Assistant .............. 570-4020 Reevee, Sharon, Parts Clerk ......................................... 570-4028 Renaud, Nan M., Information Services ........................ 324-2054 Richardson, Jacquline, HIPPY Coordinator ................ 324-2266 Ridgell, Shirley, Human Reeources, Secy ................... 324-2085 Robertson, Larry S., Assistant Superintendent .......... 324-2007 Robinson, Bettye, Transportation Supv ...................... 570-4002 Robinson, Robert, Teacher Recruitment Coor ........... 324-2086 Rodgers, Norma, Executive Asslstant ......................... 324-2012 Rodgers, Sue, SOS Coodlnator .................................... 324-2091 Rogers, Martha, CARE Supervisor .............................. 324-2395 Roper, Annette, HIPPY Coordinator ............................ 324-2266 Rose, Shyrel, Special Education .................................. 324-2188 Ruffins, John, Acting Dir., Information Services ........ 324-2060 Runyan, Debra, Plant Servicee, Construction Secy ... 324-4020 Rushing, Debbie, Drug Prevention .............................. 324-2166 Rushing, Jerry, Drug Prevention .................................. 324-2165 Rynders, Diane, Coor, Gifted ........................................ 324-2187 Sanders, Lynette, Financial Services .......................... 324-2073 Saults, Chuck, KLRE/KUAR FM ................................... 569-8485 Schult, Shala, Fam. Ute EdJ N-Futures .................. 324-0518 Scrimager, Brenda, Community Eduction Director .... 570-4149 Sellers, Richard, FS Supv. Mgr .................................... 324-2250 Shaw, Terri, Administration Printer ............................. 324-2031 Shead, Marian, HIPPY Supervisor ................................ 324-2266 Smith, Gary, Sp. Ed. CBI ............................................... 324-21TT Smith, J-el, Custodian Annex ................................... 324-2168 Smith, Linda, Exec. Ant. Admin .................................. 324-2011 Smith, Mary, Safety/Security Secy ............................... 324-2400 Smith, Dr. Paul, Eval. Spec ........................................... 324-2125 Smith, Vernon, Const. Mgr . .......................................... 570-4026 Soo, Evelyn, Computer Spec ....................................... 324-0515 Spinelli, Gretchen, Procurement ........................................ 324-2239 Stearns, David, Trans. Mech ......................................... 570-4005 Steelman, Mary Lynn, Sp. Ed. Speech Coor ............... 324-2196 Stephens, Rose, Food Serv. Secy ................................ 324-2250 Story, Wallace, Pay. Exam ............................................ 324-2185 Stovall, Alice, Reading Director ................................... 324-0526 Streett, Barbara, Special Education ............................. 324-2184 Sutton, Anna, Food Servicee Secretary ...................... 324-2250 Sutton, Jamee, Supply Center ...................................... 324-2237 Swain, Linda, Student Hearing Officer ........................ 324-2170 Swint, Janice, Financial Servicee ................................ 324-2070 Tanner, Gail, Adm. Secy. New Futures ........................ 324-2112 Tate, Sherrell, Procurement .......................................... 324-2241 Teach, Patty, Secretary, Desegregation ...................... 324-2109 Teeter, Judy, Reading ................................................... 324-0526 Terry, Gifford, Supply Center ....................................... 324-2237 Thom, Oeborah, HIPPY Aide ..................................... 324-2266 Thom, Nanette, Division of Exceptional Children ... 324-21TT Trowell, Judy, Math Supervisor ................................... 324-0520 Tucker, Deborah, Procurement ................................... 324-2232 Umfleet, Don, Instructional TechJUb .......................... 324-05TT Underwood, Dorothy, FS Supv ..................................... 324-2250 Viner, Jamee, Trans. Foreman ...................................... 570-4005 Wagner, Jeanette, Director of Communications ........ 324-2020 Wagner, William, KLRE/KUAR ...................................... 569-8485 Waller, Cindy, Mobile Resource Ctr. Coordinator ...... 324-2164 Walls, Collen Sue, Staff Dev. Specialist ...................... 324-0500 Wallis, Carolyn, Financial Services .............................. 324-2072 Wallworth, Betty, Inst. Tech/Lib Secy ......................... 324-05TT Washington, Charlotte, Schools Secy ......................... 324-2013 Washington, Daniel, IRC ............................................... 324-05TT Watson, Christopher, Trenaportation Service Tech ........ 570-4005 Watson, Dr. Linda, Student Hearing ............................ 324-2170 Watson, Tommy, Mobile Resource Specialist ............ 324-2164 White, Tony, Supply Center .......................................... 324-2237 White, Rita, Exec. Administrative Asst. ....................... 324-2087 Wiedower, Julie, Student AMignment Coordinator ... 324-2280 Williama, Ethel, Pay. Test. Secy ................................... 324-2178 Williama, Dr. Henry P., Superintendent ....................... 324-2012 Williams, Patty, PAC Secretary .................................... 324-0525 Williams, Ruth, Information Services .......................... 324-2052 Williams, Sharon, Student Assign. Data Entry ........... 324-2287 Williams, Sharon, Division of Exceptional Children ... 324-21TT Williams, Tommy, Supply Center ................................. 324-2237 Willis, Leonard, Supply Ctr. Manager .......................... 324-2237 Wilson, Gayle, VIPS ........................................................ 324-2293 Wisner, Beth, Psychological Examiner ....................... 324-2174 Wofford, Pat, Food Services Secretary ....................... 324-2250 Woods, Marian, Staff Development Specialist ............ 324-0500 Woosley, Lucy, Financial Serv ..................................... 324-2067 Young, Krishna, Special Education ............................. 324-2192 Young, Linda, N-Futures Liaison ............................. 324-2113 Zawislak, Anna, VIPS ..................................................... 324-2294 Zoch, Edwin, KLRE/KUAR FM ...................................... 569-8485 LRSD Personnel Directory The Personnel Directory is produced by the Human Resources, Information Services and Communications Department of the Little Rock School District. Employees' address and/or telephone changes should be sent as soon as they occur to the Human Resources Department. Forms are provided in the principals' offices for this purpose. Changes or additions to the first seven pages should be sent to the Communications Department. I I I I : Other Frequently Called Numbers Alternative Learning Center .......................................... 324-2370 ArkaneH Department of Education ............................. 682-4475 Arkaneae Education A .. ociation ................................. 375-4611 Arkan PTA ................................................................ 753-5247 Arkaneae Teachere' Credit Union ............................... 375-9250 Arkaneae Teacher' Retirement ................................... 682-1517 Attorney. Friday. Eldredge, Clark .. ........ .... . . .... .. .. .... . .................. 376-2011 First Commercial Bank Bldg Auditors Thomas \u0026amp; Thomas ........................................................ 375-2025 Heritage West Bldg. Fax (LRSD) ..................................................................... 324-2032 Fax (Procurement) ......................................................... 324-2233 Little Rock A .. ociation of Educational Office Pereonnel President, Julie Williams ..... ....................... 4557400/562-4893 1st Vice Pres., Edna Walton ..................... 570-4190/562-8461 2nd Vice Pres., Gayle Gardner ...................... 671-6320/227-n30 Secretary, Kay Burton ..................... .............. 2283050-227-4639 Treasurer, Deana Keathley .......................... 671-6380/562-4246 Little Rock Cla .. room Teachers Auociation 1500 W. Fourth, Suite 305 .... .............................. .. ..... 372-3519 President Eleanor Coleman .......................... 372-3519/6643150 Vice Pres. John Gross .......... ......................... 671-6267/663-7962 Sec. Betty Mitchell ........................................ 671-6250/851-8650 Treas. Linda J Bell ...... ....... .......... .. ...... 3242450/758-0883 Exec. Dir Frank Martin ...... .......... ............ .. .......... 372-3519 Adm. Ass'!. Brenda Walton ........ .......... .. ............ 372-3519 Little Rock PTA Council ................................................ 224-6746 Carla Bobo, President Little Rock School District lneurance Office ............... 324-2083 Little Rock Teacher Credit Union ............................... 374-7119 Magnet Review Committee Office ................................ 758-0156 New Futuree ................................................................... 374-1011 Office of Deeegregation Monitoring ............................. 376-6200 Pfeifer Camp .................................................................. 821-3714 Phyeican, School Dietrict ............................................. 320-4362 Dr. Chris Smith Ark. Children's Hospital Principal' Roundtable President, Lionel Ward ....... ....... .. ....... 228-308612277333 Pres. Elect, Jodie T. Carter ........................... 568-0930!570-4100 Secretary, Anne Mangan ... .. .................... 324-2385/666-5777 Treasurer, Gwen Zeigler ............................. 570-4180/664-2967 Subetitute Office Service  Elementary ................................................................ 324-2093 Secondary ................................................................. 324-2092 Treaeurer Louis J. Schaufele ........................................................ 378-1000 Worthen Bank Building Schools Address Alternative Learning Ctr. 800 Appereon, 02 Badgett 8900 Pecan Road, 06 Bale 6501 W. 32nd, 04 Baeeline Booker Brady Carver Central Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale Jr. Dodd Dunbar Fair Fair Park Foreet Heighta Foreet Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbe Hall Henderson Jefferson Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Jr. McClellan McDermott Mann Meadowcliff Metropolitan Mitchell Otter Creek Parkview Puluki Height Elam. Pulukl Heighta Jr. Righteell Rockefeller Romine Southwest Stephane Tarry Wakefield WHhington Wateon Waetern Hille Williama Wilson Woodruff 3623 BHeline Rd., 09 2016 Berber, 06 7915 W. Markham, 05 2100 E. 6th, 02 1500 Park, 02 11100 Chicot, 72103 6500 Hinkeon Rd., 09 6300 Hinkson Rd., 09 6423 Stagecoach Rd., 04 1100 Wright Ave., 06 13420 Dodd, 10 616 No. Harrison, 05 5901 Evergreen, 05 1600 No. Tyler, 07 1701 So. Harrieon, 04 300 Pleuant Valley Dr., 12 3615 W. 25th, 04 5240 Mabelvale Pike, 09 1115 W.16, 02 6700 \"H\" Street, 05 401 Barrow Rd., 05 2600 No. McKinley, 07 9401 Mabelvale Cut-off, 72103 10811 Mabelvale W., 72103 9417 Geyer Springe, 09 1200 Reeervoir Rd., 07 1000 E. Rooeevelt Rd., 06 25 Sheraton Dr., 09 7701 Scott Hamilton, 09 241 O Battery, 06 16000 Otter Creek Pky., 09 2501 Barrow, 04 319 No. Pine, 05 401 No. Pine, 05 911 W. 19th, 06 700 E. 17th, 06 3400 Romine Rd., 04 3301 So. Bryant, 04 3700 W. 18th, 04 10800 Mara Lynn Dr., 11 75 Weetminietar, 09 115 W. 27th, 06 7000 Valley Dr., 09 4901 Weetern Hille, 04 7301 Evergreen, 07 4015 Stannue Rd., 04 3010W.7th,05 I Ir Phone Principals Secretaries Cafeteria Nurses i 324-2370 Othello Faison Melinda Rodgers Geo~gia Greer Ed Hamlett 324-2475 Mary Golston Shirley Moore Rose Wright Marsha Mahan 570-4050 Levanna Wileon Lucy Hendrick Barbara Glover Ed Hamlett 570-4150 Dr. Mary Jane Cheatham Annett Jon\" Pat Singley Millie McKenzie 324-2482 Dr. Cheryl Simmon, Marye PowelVTilh1 Joyner Uvita Scott.John.on 228-3065 MaryManking Jackie Wherry Olene Curry Gwen Efird 324-2480 Mary Guinn Betty Sinpson/Phyftil Forbes Vivian Harris Mary Jo Curtis 324-2300 Rudolph Howard Francee Rodgers Betty Rone Kay Mobley I 570-4062 Oti1 Prnlar Louise TuckIOonnie Walker Edith Blythe Kim Hayman 570-4055 Frederick Fields Nettie Higgin Audrey Walker Jo Ann Curry 'i 570-4085 Gayle Bradford Darlane Martinek Jo Ann Curry 455.7430 Patricia McNeil Sue Mitchell Jimmie Thomas Vicki Barney 324-2440 Nancy Acre Marilyn McGrew Bobble Dickerson Lillian Wittenberg 228-3100 Al Niven Nan Howard Rita Farner Marie Davia 671-6260 Barbara Mean, Winnie Camp Claire Burch PamJacklon 671-6390 Richard Maple Becky Blanzenaki Joyce Weems Jo Gillum 671-6267 Virginia A1hley Pal Lu1by Carolyn Cole 671-6380 Franklin Davia Deana Keathley Elizabeth Young Lavelle Rollin 228-3080 Mac Huffman Joyce Wyatt/Karen Redd it Sylvia Boren Lucia Perry 671-6275 Robert Brown Rachel Williama Wonda Gilley Ann Callaway 570-4160 Eleanor Cox Kimberly Roaby Mae Kyzer Kim Hayman 324-2490 Donna Davie Sherri Herndon Eaaie Rayford Lucia Perry 671-6200 Dr. Vic Anderson Kay Gunter Charlene Jay Janice Yeatman 228-3050 Clell Watte Merilee Low Kathleen Bisbee Carla Kelley 671-6281 Francia Cawthon Barbara Ball Marilyn Masterson Barbara Bonner 455-7420 Julie Davenport Jo Greenlee/Bobbye Livy Brenda Browning Frankie Falkner 455-7400 Waller Marahaleck Nancy Wuneburger Carol Little Frankie Falkner 570-4100 Jodie Carter Elora Coleman Dorothy Robinson Theresa Bour 228-3072 Mike Oliver Rhonda Dorsett Earline Collins Pam Jack.on 324-2450 Marian Lacey Lynda Qualle Laura Tanner Becky Sage 570-4165 Jerry Worm JeeaieWebb Connie Moore Vicki Barney 565-8465 Dr. Doyle Dillahunty Margaret Holt Brenda Matthe- 324-2415 Dr.Samuel Branch Sandra Johnson Mary Reece Margaret Bland 455-7440 Carolyn Teeter Beth Gremillion Ruby Mickle Vicki Barney 228-3000 Junious Babbs Carolyn Alexander Georgette Moore Barbara Bonner 671-6290 Lillie Carter Margie Northcutt Shirley Crow Deborah Boll 671-6250 Ralph Hoffman Eleanor Bodenhaner Shirley Crow Deborah Bolla 324-2430 Sharon Davia Minnie Vault Mantha Gilliam Nina Williams 324-2385 Anne Mangan Melody Barnn Wanda Mobley Cindy Warren 228-3086 Lionel Ward Renee Smith Reba Hen.on Marsha Mahan 570-4070 Charity Smith Mary Jo Stone Janet Ivy Ed Hamlett 671-6350 Lonnie S. Dean Beverly Harrie Alice Byers Elizabeth Anglin 228-3093 LaDell Looper Ann Campbell Pam La-on Marie Davia 570-4190 Willie Morris Edna Walton Sarah Sellers Millie McKenzie I 324-2470 Karan Buchanan Phyllis Ellie Christine Franklin Betty Nieaer 570-4195 There\" Courtney Annie David.on Martha Shepherd Pam Jackson 570-4175 Scott Morgan Peggy Weeks Irene Gulley Janice Yeatman 671-6363 Dr. Ed Jack.on Gir11Udt Blowni~Kriati T obty Arlene Chambl ... Sue Shappard 570-4180 Gwan Zeigler Ella Ander.on Mary Lynch Margo Swanson 671-6270 Pat Higginbotham Carolyn Burt Christine Farria Millie McKenzie WIii II Personal Numbers ill ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENT Prlnclpal: Othello Falson 800 Apperson St Uttle Rock, AR 72202 324-2370 ALEXANDER, EVA CUSTOOIAN 624 FLETCHER n202 374-8107 ANDERSON, RUGENAL TEACHER 6301 CAMP ROBINSON RD #14 n118 BANKS, OTIS R TEACHER 410 DIVISION n114 3n-7637 CONNELLY, KENNETH D TEACHER RT 3 BOX 57 n104 332-8719 DOBBINS, TYRONE CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1109 G STREET n114 945-5992 FAISON, OTHELLO 0 PRINCIPAL/ALTERNATIVE SCH 1823 SOUTH TAYLOR n204 666-8321 GRANDON, COLLEEN IC COONSELOR 4304 LEE n205 664-2148 GREER, GEORGIA WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 5806 MANDAN ROAD n210 821-3010 HAMLETT, ROBERT EDWIN SCHOOL NURSE 32 PRINCE DR n1u 851-8345 ICE\u0026lt;MI, ADA L TEACHER 10513 DIAMOND DRIVE n209 562-4162 MOORE JR, FRED SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4110 ~ST 25TH STREET n204 664-0637 OICERE, CAROLINE A AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 5913 LYNDELL DRIVE n209 562-1487 PETTUS, CARLL SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 708 GREENLEA DRIVE n114 945-1525 REINHART, THOMAS T TEACHER n202 ROBERTSON, ANDREW A AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 714 PINE STREET no32 327-4973 TARTT, PHYLLIS G TEACHER n114 THOMAS JR, NEHEMIAH TEACHER 9201 KANIS APT. 9-F n205 BADGETT ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Mary Golston 6900 Pecan Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72206 324-2475 ADAMS, ARBELLE WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 2901 LOMA DRIVE n206 490-1941 ADAMS, JANET L TEACHER 929 ~ST COLONEL GLENN RO n210 821-2173 ALBERT, REJEANA J TEACHER 10 MALCOLM COVE n209 565-6837 CAMPBELL, ETHEL J TEACHER 3806 DEBUSK CIRCLE n206 374-4433 CHILDS, SANDRA D TEACHER 7 CHARING CROSS ROAD no32 329-6156 GOLSTON, MARY R ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 8419 LABETTE n204 225-5594 GRAY, KATHRYN M AIDE SUPERVISION n206 490-1661 GREGORY, PATRICIA A COONSELOR 103 ICING PINE n120 834-1984 JONES, MARY R WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 23 BEAUREGARD n206 490-0734 MAHAN, MARSHAL SCHOOL NURSE n211 225-6760 MCCRUEL, LESLIE L CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 3001 BATTERY n206 374-5924 MCGOwAN, DORIS J TEACHER 3505 HIGH n206 374-7101 MCLENNAN, ANNE TEACHER 2 ALBRIGHT CIRCLE n206 3n-0333 MERRILL, ANNETTE M ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 3123 ~ST 11TH n204 664-8277 MOORE, SHIRLEY J SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 10904 AP~TTOX n103 455-3768 NELSON, WILBURLENE R MEDIA CLERIC 3703 BOYD STREET n204 565-8437 PEARSON, BOYCE TEACHER 2016 EAST 4 TH n202 3n3267 PHILLIPS, THELMA AIDE SUPERVISION 6406 DOVE LANE 72206 490-0757 PRUITT, GAYLA R TEACHER 2106 BROADVIEW 72032 450-0007 ROWE, MARY M TEACHER 17 FOREST BROOIC COORT 72211 221-0809 SCRUBBS JR, WALTER AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 1650 BARROW ROAD APT 38 72204 227-7315 SINGER, PATRICIA B TEACHER 320 NORTH SUMMIT 72205 TRAYLOR, KATHLEEN A TEACHER 1701 GROVE HILL 72116 771-7797 TRIMBLE, BETTY J ' TEACHER 1904 EAST CAPITOL 72202 375-7899 VALUE, TERRIL TEACHER 72204 WATSON, MERLYN F LIBRARIAN 25 JANWOOO DRIVE n201 228-9510 WATSON, MURIEL C AIDE  REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 2907 MARSHALL 72206 371-0831 WILLIAMS, LARRY L CUSTOOIAN 72206 WOOO, CRYSTAL A TEACHER 215 NORTH CLAREMONT 72116 833-6953 WRIGHT, ROSE M MANAGER ELEMENTARY Foa\u0026gt; WYATT, JANICE IC TEACHER BALE ELEMENTARY 6501 West 32nd St Uttle Rock, AR 72204 570-4050 ALLEN, LILLIAN F WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC BRANCH, MARTHA A TEACHER BROWN, CLARA J TEACHER CARR, SUSIE WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC CHILDS, FRANCES C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET COLLINS, PEGGY S TEACHER CONLEY, FRANCES J TEACHER DOCKERY, MAE IC TEACHER EASTERLY, SHEILA A AIDE REGULAR BUDGET FLC1,IERS, MARTHA L CUSTODIAN HEAD FRENCH, MELISSA IC TEACHER GADDY, ELLISTINE TEACHER GENTRYHEARD, RENEE' TEACHER GETER, R\u0026lt;JtJNDA L AIDE REGULAR BUDGET GEURIN, RAMONA M TEACHER GLOVER, BARBARA J MANAGER  ELEMENTARY Foa\u0026gt; Goa\u0026gt;EN, CORINE WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC HAMLETT, ROBERT EDWIN SCHOOL NURSE HARRIS, RONALD CUSTODIAN PART TIME HENDRICKS, LUCY M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL HILL, CAROLYN AIDE REGULAR BUDGET HlJlSON, MARY B AIDE REGULAR BUDGET HUTTO, MARYE TEACHER JACKSON JR, JOSEPH TEACHER JOHNSON, CARTHORIA TEACHER JOHNSON, DELMA J TEACHER MCBRIDE, BARBARA L TEACHER MILLER, VANESSA C AIDE SUPERVISION NELSON, JOANN E TEACHER NELSON, WILBURLENE R MEDIA CLERIC PLEDGER, OSHIE L TEACHER ROGERS, CHARLENE I TEACHER ROOSE, WARREN J COONSELOR SCARBROOGH, VALARIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE SCHOFIELD, SANDRA LIBRARIAN SHENEP, CYNTHIA IC TEACHER SINGH, DONNA F TEACHER ST! LES, DONNA M TEACHER TALLEY, HELEN J TEACHER WILSON, LEVANNA M ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL YEAGER, JlJllTH A TEACHER BASELINE ELEMENTARY 3623 Basellne Rd Little Rock, AR 72209 570-4150 AKERS, SMARRA D COONSELOR 1419 HANGER n202 376-4710 801 S ROONEY PARHAM #9H n205 2210421 Prlnclpal: Levanna WIison 7 WESTMONT CIRCLE n209 562-7402 8908 LEATRICE DRIVE n201 2257629 4508 WEST 1nH 71601 536-4108 1867 RICE 72202 3n-1514 9 SHAWNEE FOREST COVE n212 228937'9 1806 BRUCE no32 3003 EGGMAN LANE no32 327.3497 12007 TETON FOREST DRIVE n212 224-3807 5001 WEST 65TH APT B106 n209 562-7177 1406 PEYTON n204 1214 MAIN STREET n173 7963585 3205 BOYD n204 2243938 5320 MARYLAND n204 666-7063 3215 BISHOP n206 1708 SHUMATE n212 223-8570 3805 HOLT ST n204 565-2774 1601 S CEDAR n204 32 PRINCE DR n113 851-8345 2105 SCHILLER STREET n202 3n7476 4314 PINE DRIVE no15 847-2211 2100 WEST 22ND n202 376-1216 #24 BAY STREET n204 2244280 2919 ADAM STREET no32 327-9997 RT 4 BOX 142 n111 11801 DESOTO FOREST n212 223-8162 n216 9316 LABETTE DRIVE n204 225-1958 4124 WEST 15TH n204 6644116 1223 SOOTH TAYLOR n204 663-7793 3703 BOYD STREET n204 565-8437 6212 SHIRLEY DRIVE n204 666-167'9 4319 COBB n204 565-7848 n15 APACHE n205 661-0522 6200 ASHER AVE APT #176 n204 7703 ILLINOIS n201 224-6022 824 BEACON HILL COORT n211 225-7524 116 NEVADA 71901 15 NOB VIEW n205 225-1607 37 LAKESIDE n204 565-4146 1818 S JACKSON n204 663-0119 1118 WILD TURKEY COORT n211 225-3804 Principal: Dr. Mary Jane Cheatham 34 MELINDA DRIVE n209 562-8857 BAKER, PAULA E AIDE - FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 1304 MARLYN DRIVE 72205 BROOKS, LETITIA R TEACHER 116 SOUTH 24TH 71923 246-7057 BURCHETT, CARLETTA D TEACHER 9121.LEW DRIVE APT C 72209 BURCHFIELD, VICKI TEACHER 21443 CRABAPPLE CIRCLE 72065 888-1077 CALDWELL, JOSEPHINE B AIDE SUPERVISION 2701 SOUTH CROSS 72206 375-8055 CANNON, SHIRLEY L AIDE - REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 3801 BASELINE APT 24 72209 CARTER, CHARLES R TEACHER 1323 SOUTH TYLER 72204 CASEY, DOROTHY A AIDE - SUPER1SION 5205 EAST 145TH STREET 72206 897-1190 CHEATHAM, MARY J ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11401 SOUTHR IDGE 72212 225-4938 CONLEY, TINA A AIDE - FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 9914 DOBBY 72206 DEATON, BETTY K TEACHER 1049 CLINTON 71923 246-8537 FOSTER, BARRON J CUSTODIAN 3513 WHITFIELD 72204 228-0818 FOWLER, MILLICENT K TEACHER 1811 SOOTH GRANT 72204 661-1082 GAYLOR, ELSIE WORKER - ELEM FOOD SERVIC 311 CHARBETT DRIVE 72204 565-1269 GLASON, DIANNE M TEACHER 3313 WEST 10TH 72204 663-4584 HARDESTY, PATTY J TEACHER 7435 ANDERSON 72002 847-3406 HARRIS, BEVERLY CUSTODIAN 2112 SOUTH MARTIN 72204 666-6312 HARRIS, LORETTA M TEACHER 1500 S. TYLER 72204 .664-3045 HUFFMAN, CAROLYN A TEACHER 111 BROWNING DRIVE 71913 767-3001 HUSSEY, PAULINE K AIDE - SUPERVISION 8711 MIZE ROAD 72209 562-8183 JACKSON, CONNIE M AIDE - SUPERVISION 4010 ARAPAHO TRIAL 72209 568-2281 JAMES, MARILYN K TEACHER 4500 UNION AVE #43 71603 879-5798 JAMES, TERRIE J MEDIA CLERK 116 EAST 11G11 72116 758-8671 JONES, ANNETTE L SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL 4304 MARYLAND AVENUE 72204 LAMB, ANITA J TEACHER 13111 WEST MARKHAM APT 37 72211 223-9810 MARSHALECK, DONNA M TEACHER 2620 RIVERFRONT APT 256 72202 660-4458 MAYFIELD, CARLOS D AIDE - REGULAR BUDGET 2100 RICE STREET 72202 376-8016 MCDONALD, MARY J TEACHER 504 NEILING ROAD 72205 227-6046 MILLER, MICHAEL A WORKER - ELEM FOOD SERVIC #4 TRENT DRIVE 72209 562-3590 MITCHELL, MARIA A TEACHER 2804 WEST 6TH 72205 664-4668 NALLEY, MARGARET R LIBRARIAN 13017 CRABAPPLE PLACE 72209 455-2081 NORMAN, ANN C TEACHER 7101 GUINEVERE DRIVE 72209 562-3435 POTEET, LISA B TEACHER 3322 CARMINE COVE 72022 847-1465 RENDEL, RAYL CUSTODIAN - HEAD 609 PARKDALE 72117 945-2897 RUNYAN, JLl\u0026gt;ITH A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5511 BASELINE #9 72209 565-6332 SELF, ELAINE M TEACHER #29 MARKHAM PLACE 72211 224-7219 SINGLEY, PATRICIA L MANAGER - ELEMENTARY FOOD 1311 WEST WOODSON LATERAL 72065 888-8644 SNITH, DELWIN H TEACHER 3720 HIGH DRIVE 72206 372-2803 SNITH, EUNICE D TEACHER #14 HAWTHORNE DRIVE 72032 327-6316 SNITH, WILLIAM 0 TEACHER 9503 NORTH VIEW DRIVE 72120 834-5738 WEDGE, KIMBERLY D WORKER - ELEM FOOD SERVIC 15907 SHIRLEY DRIVE 72002 847-9655 WHITTAKER, NONA M TEACHER P .0. BOX 250021 72225 664-6694 YOUNG, STACEY L TEACHER 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD #119 72207 223-8901 BOOKER MAGNET Principal: Dr. Cheryl Simmons 2016 Barber St Little Rock, AR 72206 324-2482 ABBOTT, JO ANN TEACHER 5901 JFK BLVD #4224 72116 ALLEY, MARYL TEACHER 7575 CANTRELL APT 38 72207 663-4420 ARMSTRONG, MARTHA A TEACHER 5009 ROOSEVELT 72002 847-3072 AUST! N, CLARA D TEACHER 13820 WINDSOR ROAD 72212 225-5439 BAKER, MICHELE LYNN TEACHER 1221 RESERVOIR APT 146 72207 221-0789 BIRD, NOBUKO E WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 111 HAMPTON COVE 72076 982-7105 BISHOP, NANCY COUNSELOR 82 ROB I NlJOD 72207 BLEDSOE, RITA l TEACHER 9907 SUFFOLK DRIVE 72204 227-9907 BONOS, WILMA 8 TEACHER 13425 1-30 72015 778-0911 BROWN, MARTHA C TEACHER 23815 HWY 10 72212 8689617 IURNS, PATRICIA M LIBRARIAN 7419 OHIO #3A 72207 6668266 BURRUSS, MERILYN P TEACHER 12 TALLYHO 72207 2285783 CHARLESTON, $ANTONIA AIDE SUPERVISION ROOTE 2 BOX 543 72206 4901836 CLARK, DENISE W TEACHER 8416 EASY STREET 72116 8348941 COLFORD, SUSAN TEACHER 600 NORTH MARTIN 72205 663-7202 CURRY, VIRGINIA E AIDE SUPERVISION 212 HILDA 72076 982-2n4 DAVIS, VELLA D MEDIA CLERIC 1923 EAST 38TH 72206 374.4775 DICKERSON, KAYE H TEACHER 11 BIRCHwoa\u0026gt; DRIVE 72032 3298612 DOOLEY, VIVIAN IC COONSELOR 5918 LIBERTY COVE 72209 5681251 DORER, ROBERT A TEACHER 33405 HWY 300 72135 330-2850 DUNAVIN, IVA L WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 72206 ELLINGTON, LORETTA TEACHER 12120 PLEASANT FOREST DRI 72212 EZELL, DONNA J WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 1621 WEST SHORT 1nH 72114 376-7114 FARLEY, JENNIFER D TEACHER 22 JOHNNY LANE 72116 8348675 GIPSON, DEBRA ELISE TEACHER 325 B SOOTH MITCHELL 72032 329-4943 HAMPTON, PAULA R TEACHER 5300 BASELINE ROAD APT 12 72209 8887318 HARDING, CASSANDRA D TEACHER 7805 woa\u0026gt;HAVEN 72209 HARRELL, ALICE L AIDE SUPERVISION 1906 DOVER LANE 72206 375-6052 HAYES, \u0026lt;4AH CUSTOOIAN 3116 CENTER STREET 72206 375-2718 HESTIR, JOANN TEACHER 1817 WEWOKA DRIVE 72116 834-2365 HIGDON, TAMMY TEACHER 7700 NORTH HILLS BLVD #80 72116 834-0192 HUIE, CAROLYN IC TEACHER 200 MILLwoa\u0026gt; CIRCLE #413 72206 851 0486 JEFFRIES, VEARLON L TEACHER 1218 WEST 28TH 72206 JOHNSON, MAYREAN S TEACHER 11893 RIVERCREST DRIVE 72212 JONES, ALICIA R TEACHER 43 WARREN DRIVE APT #98 72209 JOYNER, TISA S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 420 MESA DRIVE APT IC54 72211 WP, ROSE MARIE TEACHER 914 SCHRINER CClJRT 72116 753-3325 KELLEY, CLEMENTINE TEACHER 6601 STERLING DRIVE 72204 6632584 KELLEY, LOIS W TEACHER 15 INVERNESS CIRCLE 72212 227-5148 KELLY, EVELYN TEACHER 1604 SCOTT APT B 72206 372-5338 KINDER, JAMES B TEACHER 8617 NANCY PLACE 72204 562-0879 _LACEY JR, JESSE J ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 6412 SHIRLEY DR 72204 664-7912 LEHNHOFF, DENNA N TEACHER 5905 LOWRANCE 72118 758-4167 LOFTON, MARY R TEACHER 10 HAMPSHIRE CIRCLE 72212 225-0966 MARSHALL, JAMES A CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1404 S WASHINGTON 72204 664-2158 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN IC TEACHER 500 CAMBRIDGE PLACE 72207 836-2785 MCMORRAN, NARY E TEACHER 101 LANCASTER 72209 56223n MEYERDIRIC, CAROL A TEACHER 1201 SOOTHEDGE 72207 225-9121 MIDDLETON, PATSY A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 13120 QUAIL CREEK #B 72206 8884587 NEIICOMB, DARYL D TEACHER 2124 N. ARTHUR 72207 664-9246 OICECHUICW, MARIAN WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 116 SOOTH LOCUST 72114 945-7895 OLIVER, ORA D AIDE SUPERVISION 64 N MEADOWCLIFF 72209 565-0956 PLEASANT, CARWIN J TEACHER 2714 STATE 72206 374-1309 P\u0026lt;IIELL, MARYE M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL #3 KARON CT 72205 225-1086 RAGLAND, STEPHANIE J CUSTOOIAN 2019 E 4TH 72202 3745812 SARLO, THOCAS C TEACHER 2024 LLOYD CClJRT 72205 376-4316 SCOTTJOHNSON, UVITA L SCHOOL NURSE 912 BEDFORD 72202 3753796 SIMMONS, CHERYL A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 3300 NORTH CYPRESS 72116 n1-1035 SMITH, MARY A TEACHER 3609 TLCOR DRIVE 72204 2240603 TAYLOR, CAROLYN W TEACHER 7905 DEERwoa\u0026gt; DRIVE 72204 2248707 TROTTER, DANIELL CUSTOOIAN 5000 WEST 29TH 72204 WALKER, BERTHENA C TEACHER 1317 SCHILLER 72202 6642234 WALLS, BOBBIE J TEACHER 2617 LOOISIANA STREET 72206 3758547 WEIR, NANCY L TEACHER 909 SCHRINER COORT 72116 7584072 WHITE, DISHOONGH TEACHER 2201 CENTER 72206 3744919 WHITE, GLORIA A TEACHER 12815 HWY 365 72206 8975229 WOOOS, BRENDAL AIDE SUPERVISION 1022 APPERSON 72202 3759205 WORTHY, PAMELA L WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 10520 TOPAZ CIRCLE 72209 5657659 YOUNG, MICHELLE L TEACHER 12315 CHERRY LAUREL DRIVE 72211 2212302 BRADY ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Mary Menklng 7915 West Markham St Little Rock, AR 72205 228-3065 I BRADLEY, ROZALYN M TEACHER 10613 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE n212 227-5536 BROIIN, LAWRENCE CUSTOOIAN 813 HARRINGTON n202 376-0039 CHARLES, KATHLEEN M TEACHER 504 MCADOO n2os 663-7388 CROMEDY, GERALDINE TEACHER 1105 SOUTH CLEVELAND n204 664-5180 CROSBY, SUSAN M TEACHER 115 INDIAN TRAIL n201 228-0170 CURRY, OLENE E MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 7904 WESTWOOO n204 565-4475 DOUGLAS, PAMELA J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC nus DUGAN, FRANCES R TEACHER 3021 CHARTER OAK n201 227-0327 ELAM, MARSHAL TEACHER 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #101 n201 228-5443 EVANS, ANITA F WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1420 BISHOP n202 375-5007 FOSTER, DONALD CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 3112 BOYD ~209 GAMBLE, SUSANNE COUNSELOR #2 NOTTINGHAM RD. #1 n2os 664-2371 GORDON, JAN I CE L TEACHER 10 SUMMERHILL CT n211 2278857 HANNAHS, BARBARA I TEACHER 12704 ST CHARLES BLVD n211 223-9505 HARDY, KATHRYN C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n214 HARKEY, JANE A TEACHER 2027 NORTH ARTHUR n201 6632892 HIMSTEDT, KIMBERLY H TEACHER 42 GREENVIEW CIRCLE n116 834-0066 HOOGES, BARBARA L TEACHER 4709 EASTWOOO n204 5650816 JONES JR, EARNEST L AIDE SUPERVISION n209 562-8389 KOON, BETTY R TEACHER 4319 COBB n204 562-4652 LESTER, SANDRA L TEACHER 31 OAK FOREST DRIVE n113 851-3695 MCCLURKAN, EDWINA Y TEACHER 19306 QUAIL RUN n209 455-1421 MCGEE, SUZANNE B TEACHER 112 CAMBRIDGE PLACE n201 2259590 MCINTYRE, GORDON L TEACHER ROUTE 1 BOX 89H no16 982-2330 MENKING, MARY A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5 HERITAGE COURT n211 2253822 MOORE, PATSY A AIDE SUPERVISION 4100 ELAM n204 562-1408 NICHOLS, VALARIE R AIDE SUPERVISION 1422 EAST 38TH n206 3n-s111 NUNLEY, GLORIA A LIBRARIAN 601 CENTER no32 329-7199 01NEAL, EARNEST L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4920 AUGUSTA CIRCLE APT G n118 OLIVER, SHELLY R TEACHER 14 P\u0026lt;l'tl)ERHORN COURT n212 225-9332 ROSE, SHERRYL TEACHER 11119 COCONO VALLEY n212 2251119 SHELLS, GENEVA S TEACHER 6613 STERLING DRIVE n204 664-7763 SITLINGTON, CAROL W MEDIA CLERK 2no CROUCHWOOO ROAD n201 663-6658 SUMNER, FRANKIE B TEACHER #6 EVERGREEN CIRCLE n201 666-8537 TAYLOR, WONE D AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n204 TEETER, KATHRYN A TEACHER 1700 TARRYTOIIN ROAD n201 225-7852 TOLBERT, IRMA J TEACHER 4820 TIMBERLAND DRIVE n204 663-9353 VARDAMAN, TAMIL TEACHER 14312 RIDGEWOOO n211 WAMBLE, FAUSTINE TEACHER 608 SHACKLEFORD n211 WASHINGTON, MARY A TEACHER 2011 BATTERY n202 WELLS, MISTYE ELIZABETH TEACHER 8120 W MARKHAM #12 n2os 221-9868 WHERRY, JACQUELINE L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL n209 WHITE, LATONIA M WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 10209 INDEPENDENCE n209 568-6741 WIGHT, LINDA M AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 11000 STAGECOACH ROAD APT n2os WILLIAMS, ERNESTINE WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC n206 WILLIAMS, SARAH M AIDE SUPERVISION 813 HARRINGTON n202 376-4365 WILLIAMS, WILLIE F CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 9305 MALABRI DRIVE n209 568-5216 WOFFORD, HELEN L AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 710 IIEST M APT 105 n116 YOUNG, EVA M TEACHER 3708 HOLT n204 562-n25 ... CAl:IVER MAGNET Prlnclpal: Mary Guinn 2100 East Sixth St Uttle Rock, AR 72202 324-2460 AMNEL, LINDA G COUNSELOR 2105 DORCHESTER 72204 225-9438 ANDREWS, SHARON F TEACHER 9115 LEATRICE DRLVE 72207 2250522 BAKER, PATRICIA A AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 717 EAST 15TH STREET 72114 3787826 BARKSDALE, MARY D ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 8 BRADLEY LANE 72207 225-3068 BELOTTI, VIRGINIA M LIBRARIAN 5612 WALNUT ROAD 72116 7582576 BENNETT, AC TEACHER 11119 COCONO VALLEY 72212 2251119 BOYD, DARRELL L AIDE SUPERVISION 5519 VALLEY DRIVE 72209 565-6858 BURNEY, MARY C TEACHER 6 MOCKINGBIRD LANE 72207 6637050 BYRO, DEBORAH H TEACHER 6025 BATTLE TRL 72211 868-5881 CALD~LL, CHARLOTTE CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 3616 ARAPAHO 72209 565-2702 CAMPBELL, KAREN G TEACHER #11 POST OAK LOOP 72120 8356367 CRUM, JANES TEACHER 1012 CHEPSTOW LANE 72116 835-8076 CURTIS, JULIE B TEACHER 512.0 GARRISON ROAD 72211 821-3786 CURTIS, MARY J SCHOOL NURSE 921 GILLETTE 72205 2256365 DOYNE, ANGELA K TEACHER P.O. BOX 166 72053 490-1255 EFIRD, WENDY L AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 4101 \"A\" APT 3 72205 6667358 FLEMING, LINDA K TEACHER 10 LAMONT DR 72209 FORBES, PHYLLIS P SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 1010 EAST 11TH 72114 371-0213 GIBSON, SUSANY AIDE SUPERVISION 1405 EAST 11TH APT 403 72202 374-4252 GLENN, BETTY TEACHER 6200 \"I\" STREET 72207 666-9333 GLENN, LINDA F TEACHER 4500 COLVERT ROAD 72211 821-2137 GRIMMITT, BONNIE S AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 8515 KENNESAW 72103 4553317 GUINN, MARYE ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 13 LAKESIDE .DRIVE 72204 562-0382 HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J TEACHER 5301 COUNTRY CLUB 72207 664-5843 HARRIS, VIVIAN A MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO RT 1 BOX 299 72142 HARRISON, KATHLEEN A TEACHER 72211 HARSHAW, HERRIN F AIDE SUPERVISION 1210 GEYER APT 901 72202 376-8065 HASAN, ABDULLAH H CUSTOOIAN 8724 HIGGINS SWITCH ROAD 72206 4901198 HENRY, JULIE D TEACHER 1713 PARK STREET 72104 HOOKER, MELBA J TEACHER 72116 753-3610 HURD, LISA K TEACHER #44 HWY 285 E. 72058 67'96290 JOHNSON, IRENE B AIDE SUPERVISION 9705 HIGHWAY 365 72206 897-4942 JOSEPH, JUNE D TEACHER 1702 ARROWHEAD RD APT D 72118 753-9889 KELLEY, BRYANA D TEACHER 12415 TIMBER BEND DRIVE 72211 228-9589 KEOWN, MARY J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC RTE 2 BOX 652 72206 490-0849 LANGLEYS, DIANNE W TEACHER 3700 CANTRELL #703 72202 6646613 LEE, AUDREY M ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7423 GRACE DRIVE 72209 MACK, ROBERT CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 910 KIRSPEL 72202 374-5438 MANNING, DEBRA A TEACHER 7300 KINGWOCO ROAD 72207 6638865 MANNON, ROBERTA A TEACHER 305 SPRINGWOCO DRIVE 72211 MARCRUM, HAZEL J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 5601 HARKINS AVENUE 72210 821-4961 MAULDIN, MINNIE W WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 4601 WEST 24TH 72204 MAYWEATHER, ELNORA AIDE SUPERVISION 1117 BOUNDLESS 72202 375-2849 MORRIS, NELDA J MEDIA CLERK #26 OLD ORCHARD DRIVE 72103 455-1211 MUNNS, PATRICIA A TEACHER 1109 BISCAYNE DRIVE 72207 221-3522 OGLE, LIBBY J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 72103 PACE, TEATA D TEACHER 25027 HIGHWAY 365 NO. 72113 851-0434 PENN, PRISCILLA J TEACHER 7 OAK FOREST COVE 72113 851-2913 POWER, LEETA D TEACHER 17 EAST LAKE DRIVE 72116 n1-0691 ROBERTS, M MARTHA TEACHER 2922 LEE AVENUE 72205 663-1688 ROLAND, MILTON CUSTOOIAN 1122 E WASHINGTON 72114 374-7915 ROWLAND, VIRGINIA S TEACHER 3 OAKHURST DRIVE 72202 661-4639 SANDERS, PATRICIA A AIDE REGULAR BLOGET 604 \"M\" STREET APT 201 72116 758-7613 SIMPSON, BETTY R SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 11615 ASHWOOO 72211 SICUBAL, EUNICE L TEACHER 510 BRYANT MEADOWS ORIVE 72022 847-1462 SMITH, RHONDA F TEACHER 1009 VESTAL 72204 374-1614 SPANN, ME~EDITH J TEACHE~ 8300 LOUIIANDA DRIVE 72205 227-5394 SWEAT, JESCENA TEACHER 3410 DORSET DRIVE 72204 221-2526 TATUM, KATHY R COONSELOR 11411 HWY 365 72206 897-5142 THOMAS, VANNETTA J TEACHER 7107 YDRICWOOO DRIVE 72209 THOMPSON, CAROL E LIBRARIAN 21 PLANTATION 72206 490-0347 UNDERWOOOMORAVEC, LEIGH TEACHER 15 PATRICIA LANE 72058 679-5680 VALUE, TERRIL TEACHER 72204 WALKER, SHIRLEY D TEACHER 13101 A QUAIL CREEK 72206 888-3609 WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V TEACHER 1704 GLENDA DRIVE 72205 227-9031 WATTS, RONDA M TEACHER 4710 SAM PECK ROAD APT 11 72212 225-6474 WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K TEACHER 127 VERNON AVENUE 72205 376-2530 WILSON, CYNTHIA L TEACHER 1600 JOHN HARDEN DR 72076 985-2196 WINFREY, VEARLEAN AIDE SUPERVISION 1404 EAST 11 APT 113 72202 375-1753 WOOOS Ill, ROBERT L CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 1207 WEST SCENIC APT T-13 72118 753-9285 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Principal: Rudolph Howard 1500 Park St Little Rock, AR 72202 324-2300 ADAIR, GLADYS M SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 2914 MARSHALL 72206 ALLISON, ROBIN R TEACHER 6310 ASHER AVENUE APT 606 72204 565-7370 ALLMON, TERRY L TEACHER P.O. BOX 244 72183 897-5904 ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A LIBRARIAN 115 FAIRVIEW ROAD 72205 663-2070 ARICK, JOYCE A TEACHER 5206 \"f\" STREET 72205 664-2651 BECKER, MARY C TEACHER 7523 \"F\" STREET 72205 666-0644 BENNETT, TIMOTHY P TEACHER 519 EAST 6TH STREET 72202 BLACKMAN, TONY TEACHER 4802 SCHOOL 72117 945-7654 BLAIR, SAM K COUNSELOR 6421 WEST 3RD STREET #2 72205 664-1m BLESSING, DONALD K TEACHER 6609 NAVAJO 72116 835-2013 BOONE, EDDIE L TEACHER 2806 LENNOX DRIVE 72204 225-3861 ~N, RUTHIE M CUSTOOIAN 4108 WEST 23RD 72204 666-5374 BOYETT, EDWARD B TEACHER 3 TALMAGE COORT 72204 565-2162 BRACK, ROBERT L TEACHER 9425 DARTMOUTH DRIVE 72204 225-4282 BRIGGS, BOBBY C CUSTOOIAN 2822 WEST 14TH STREET 72204 376-1424 BRIGGS, DEMETRIA G SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 72206 BROWN, JAMES TEACHER 4714 WEST 29TH STREET 72204 664-9314 BROWN, JAMES A TEACHER 1201 WELCH 72202 372-7458 BYRNE, ROISIN TEACHER 1111 N JACKSON 72205 034-6469 CALDWELL, CHERYL D TEACHER 72211 CALDWELL, SUZANNE 0 TEACHER 605 SKYLINE DRIVE 72116 758-8931 CALLAWAY, ELIZABETH W COUNSELOR 6 LESLIE CIRCLE 72205 225-4336 CALLAWAY, NORMAN M TEACHER 1412 N MELLON 72207 666-7095 CARPENTER, MARGARET A TEACHER 916 JEFFERSON 72204 664-6089 CARUTH, PHYLLIS V TEACHER PO BOX 2372 72203 CASH, EVALOU H WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 3120 PEYTON 72204 666-7368 CHAMBLISS, PATRICIA A TEACHER 411 DEL RIO 72205 663-8482 CLAY, SHERRIL TEACHER 39 OPHELIA 72113 851-3271 CLOU1 JR, WILLIAM L BUILDING ENGINEER 21 LYRIC LANE 72205 227-8111 CLOU1, GAYLE H TEACHER 21 LYRIC LANE 72205 227-8111 C06B, JEAN T TEACHER 1022 NORTH CLEVELAND 72207 666-9042 COLBURN, MELISSA A TEACHER 2112 LLOYD COURT 72205 374-5033 COLE, JENNIE B TEACHER 332 NORTH RIDGE ROAD 72207 666-6250 COON, SUE L TEACHER 3353 HWY 5 SOUTH 72045 796-8490 CORTINEZ, KATHERINE TEACHER 9 CHAPARRAL LANE 72212 225-5448 COX, BERNIE L TEACHER 3121 HAZY RIDGE COORT 72207 2270323 \\ CREWS, MARY M TEACHER #9 ROCKLEDGE PLACE 72113 227-9175 DANIEL, BRANTON P TEACHER 1406 S CEDAR 72204 666-5213 DAVIS, ROBIN L TEACHER 72076 DEITZ, SANDY G TEACHER 6519 EVERGREEN ROAD 72207 663-9077 DENNIS, AU\u0026gt;RA T TEACHER 1905 S VAN BUREN 72204 664-8051 DILLARD, KRISTI L TEACHER 2010 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 72205 372-7322 DOBBINS JR, ALBERT L CUSTOOIAN 1705 YEST 23RD 72206 376-4345 DONHAM, MELISSA C TEACHER 6119 JAMES ROAD 72118 851-4755 DUMAS, ELAINE K LIBRARIAN 484 RIOGEIIAY 72205 663-7180 OUNHOO, KERVIS R CUSTOOIAN 3502 LOOWIG 72204 227-7565 DYER, JACQUELIN W TEACHER 4816 CRESTloOOO 72207 666-7934 EASTER, MARION 0 TEACHER 2450 SOUTH PARK STREET 72206 372-1690 EVANS, KATHRYN S TEACHER 2602 YEST 26TH 71603 536-0845 FAGAN, ROSIE L CUSTOOIAN - ASST HEAD 72202 FELLS, JACKIE SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 1514 YEST 20TH 72202 376-3739 FIELDS, WILLIE J AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC 2011 AZTEZ DR. APT. 192 72116 834-1967 FITZPATRICK JR, OLIVER TEACHER 5704 CHAUCER LANE 72209 568'5387 FUTRELL, BRENDA J TEACHER 32 REGENCY CIRCLE 72209 568-3596 GADBERRY, SARAH E TEACHER #3 POINT SOUTH COURT 72211 224-2801 GADDY, HELEN B TEACHER 9301 RUTGERS DRIVE 72204 224-2696 GATES, KATHY TEACHER 415 GOSHEN 72116 758-8878 GIVENS, WILLIE T CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1409 SOUTH TYLER 72204 664-1704 GRAHAM, HARRYETTE TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PKYAY #170B 72211 225-1771 GRAVES, JESSICA A COUNSELOR 31 ST THOMAS COURT 72211 225-1508 GRAW, PHYLLIS R TEACHER 2009 LLOYD COURT 72205 372-3351 GRAY, JOE A TEACHER 2606 CROSS 72206 376-7348 HAMMONS, KAREN A TEACHER 1421 SOUTH CLEVELAND 72204 HARDIN, GWENDOLYN E TEACHER 8600 EVERGREEN DRIVE 72207 224-8779 HARGIS, ALISON C TEACHER 430D loOOOLAYN 72205 666-3921 HEGGS, URSELLA W SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 9116 VICTORIA ORIVE 72209 HENDERSON, SHERRY LOU TEACHER 5116 CANTRELL ROAD 72207 663-5465 HESSELSCHYEROT, RONALD F TEACHER 9809 SNIDER COURT 72205 225-6493 HILL, MARSHAK YORKER - SR HIGH FOOO SER 4907 VAUGHN RO 72118 771-0118 HILL, SHEKETA G TEACHER 1020 MIMOSA 71603 536-4026 HOFFMAN-MCDERMOTT, MICHEL TEACHER 5 IIOOOCLIFF CIRCLE 72204 565-7615 HOGAN, SUSAN P TEACHER 107 CRYSTAL COURT 72205 664-0815 HOLLADAY, KATHLEEN T TEACHER 108 SOUTH MAIN 72015 776-1872 HOOPER, BEVERLY R TEACHER 2009 SINGLETON COURT 72204 224-2563 HOWARD, ROOOLPH SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 8106 LOUYANDA 72205 223-9711 HUFFORD, GARY W TEACHER 516 NORTH PINE STREET 72205 663-1771 IVEY, DELORES S COUNSELOR 3011 IMPERIAL OR 72212 225-0714 JAMES, BRENDA F ASST PRINCIPAL - SECONDAR 1868 ARCH STREET 72206 371-0800 JARMON, MYRA M TEACHER 1705 MISSOUR 71601 534-1174 JOHNSON, BENNY D SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 1805 WEST 18TH 72202 376-3901 JOHNSON, GRACE E CUSTOOIAN #5 QUAIL CREEK COURT 72206 897-4575 JOHNSON, JOHNNIE M YORKER SR HIGH FOOO SER 1509 SUMMIT 72202 372-6666 JOHNSON, LYNDA P COUNSELOR 12 DARTMOOTH 72204 228-7203 JONES, \u0026amp;ERNESTINE YORKER - SR HIGH FOOO SER 2020 STATE 72206 376-9652 JORDAN, MILDRED YORKER SR HIGH FOOO SER 1015 WEST 20TH 72206 375-1710 KEARNEY, LESLIE A TEACHER 60 STONELEDGE DRIVE 72113 851-4851 LANCE, CHARLES H TEACHER 4 BUFFINGTON COURT 72209 565-1918 LLOYD, OTTIMIS C AIDE - SUPERVISION 3019 YEST 1nH 72204 666-5061 LOYA, SNIJEL T TEACHER P.O. BOX 2033 72115 835-1496 MALONE, WESTINA YORKER  SR HIGH FOOD SER 8715 TEDBURN DRIVE 72209 568-6649 MARSH, 'EDWARD W TEACHER 75 LEFEVER LANE 72207 224-1240 MAYS, GRACIE C TEACHER 418 EAST 38TH 71601 536-5593 MCDONALD, DOROTHY L TEACHER 1002 BELMONT DR 71601 535-1037 MCDONALD, THOMAS A TEACHER 314 NORTH ASH 72205 663-7063 MCFADDEN, ELIZABETH K TEACHER 11201 HICKORY HILL ROAD 72211 2217110 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K TEACHER 500 CAMBRIDGE PLACE 72207 836-2785 MCKISICK, DERRICK MCLENDON, JOANNE B MCLENNAN, FREDIE D MCMURRAY, VICTOR C MEADOWS, MARKE MOGSTAD, BONNIE L MOLDEN, FLORA D MONCRIEF, GWEN V MOORE, KENT L MOSELEY, KATHLEEN K NASH, DORIS L NASH, LANGEL O'NEAL, JANE PAXTON, VERONICA J PEDIGO, MARY J PETERS, DIANE E PETERSON, MICHAEL W PETWAY, MARY A PIERCE, MAUREEN POST, JULIA A PREWIT, MARY J RAMSEY, KATHLEEN E ROBERTS, JOHN A ROBERTSON JR, THOMAS A ROBINSON, CONSTANCE F RODGERS, FRANCESE RONE, BETTY S ROSENBERGER, BETTY C ROUSSEAU, NANCY L RUTLEDGE, MARILYN F SAIN, LLOYD SCHLESINGER, DEBRA S SHOFNER, KIRBY E SIEGEL, LARRY B SIEGEL, TERESA T SIMS, JERONE E SIZEMORE, EVELYN D SNITH, DAVID M SMITH, FLOYD SMITH, JERRY SNITH, TERESA J SNODGRASS, AMYL STELL, LINDA M TAYLOR, ROBERT M TAYLOR, TRAVIS F THOMPSON, LOIS B THOMPSON, NANCY K THRASHER, BEVERLY B TIMMONS, CALVIN Tl NKLE, BETTY VENABLE, GLORIA 0 WATSON, BILLY N WATSON, PATRICIA A WATTS, DARRELL J WEBB JR, CECIL H WHITE, DIANE B WILDER, BARBARA A WILLIAMS, BETTYE F WILLIAMS, CAROLYN J WILLIAMS, KELLY D CUSTODIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER TEACHER REGISTRAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL - SECONDAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER BUILDING ENGINEER AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC TEACHER SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL MANAGER - SR HIGH FOOD SE MEDIA CLERK ASST PRINCIPAL - SECONOAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER BOOKKEEPER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF PBX OPERATOR TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF WORKER - SR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTODIAN SECRETARY - ATTENDANCE TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR ASST PRINCIPAL - SECONOAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SECRETARY - GUIDANCE SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL 3101 S BRYANT 1801 S IZARD STREET 2420 RIVERFRONT DRIVE APT 12514 COLLEEN DRIVE #5 TIMBER PARK COURT 5000 N WOOOLANO DRIVE 9820 OOBBY DRIVE 1309 CATALPA DRIVE 12524 PLEASANT VIEW 5813 BASELINE APT #234 14425 FRONTIER DRIVE #92 403 HARPER LANE 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD APT 2 18 MCGOVERN DRIVE 16920 BURLINGAME ROAD 8801 NANCY PLACE 6619 LONG\\oOOD 2 CENTENARY DRIVE 9802 HWY 165 3004 IMPERIAL VALLEY DRIV 815 SHEA DRIVE 1613 STATE NORTH APARTMEN 5533 RIDGEWAY DRIVE 6511 ELMORE ROAD 9300 TREASURE HILL ROAD # 21458 1-30 UNIT #35 21814 HENLEY LANE 11 RIVER OAKS 630 CHRISTIAN 2200 ANDOVER COURT APT 70 210 NORTH ASH 42 SUMMIT RIDGE 42 SUMMIT RIDGE 3709 WEST STREET 5306 WESTMINISTER 4 TIMBER VALLEY COVE 1601 WEST 19TH 1601 WEST 19TH 6823 1/2 WEST 65TH 13741 CHILDRESS ROAD 2218 WASHINGTON AVENUE 8 PORTSMOUTH DRIVE 42 ECHO LANE 1201 NORTH PIERCE #3 215 VERNON 9020 VICTORIA DRIVE 17512 CORINTHIAN OR 108 SOUTH MARTIN 416 WEST 25TH 12319 JACKSONVILLE-CATO R 12231 MARYLAND PLACE 53 OUACHITA DRIVE 6208 SENATE DRIVE P.O. BOX 165042 #3 CARLA DRIVE P.O. BOX 381 n204 n204 n206 n202 n212 n211 n111 n206 71603 n212 n209 n113 n118 n201 n205 n211 n204 n201 n204 n111 n212 n205 n206 no15 n209 n201 no15 n065 n201 n212 n335 n201 n205 n211 n211 n204 n209 n204 n202 n202 n209 no11 no32 n209 no32 n201 n2os n206 n209 n210 n2os n114 n120 n120 n113 n204 n209 n216 n209 n164 562-5425 375-8888 666-3n1 221-3001 225-0241 945-3470 888-9509 535-1678 221-1580 562-4570 758-1940 225-0360 225-5122 821-6229 562-4970 280-2914 568-4931 945-7678 225-6412 227-8742 374-1980 794-2812 565-2198 221-3112 847-8738 888-7316 666-1738 666-7736 224-3187 224-3187 565-3802 562-5820 374-8944 374-0006 568-5038 557-5061 329-8289 565-n93 327-3142 666-6366 371-9766 562-6800 225-7865 664-7020 753-8640 834-8122 834-n25 851-8849 565-1205 WILLIAMS, WANDA L WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 1622 SOUTH PARK STREET 72201 374-7m WILLIS, EULA N TEACHER 2802 LINDA KAY DRIVE 72206 888-2274 WILSON, CLAUDINE WORKER  SR HIGH FOOD SER P O BOX 112 72183 897-4561 WILSON, NANCY L TEACHER 2004 LLOYD COURT 72205 372-2934 CHICOT ELEMENTARY Principal: Otis Preslar 11100 Chicot Rd Mabelvale, AR 72103 570-4062 AIIIKAWE, MARGIE L WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 28 DELLWOOD DRIVE 72209 565-5383 BAILEY, JACK H TEACHER 316 NORTH PALM 72205 664-6827 BALMAZ, BETTYE M COUNSELOR 1210 DOG\\IOOO TRL 72032 327-5998 BEDOW, LAURA M TEACHER 1745 STURGIS ROAD 72032 329-4708 BLYTHE, ED 1TH MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOD 7824 BERT MARSH 72103 888-4511 BOYD, KATHLEEN AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 9920 PROSPECT LOOP 72209 568-1471 BROWN, KATHLEEN M TEACHER 3900 OAKWOOD ROAD 72205 666-7666 BRYANT, GEORGIE H TEACHER 4201 HAZELWOOD 72116 753-6028 CLEVELAND, ELLEAN D ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 521 TREY LANE 72032 327-2325 CRAVEN, ERNESTINE C LIBRARIAN 10718 WARREN DRIVE 72209 562-0746 CUNNINGS, GEORGIA L AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 11500 CHICOT ROAD #132 72103 DALE, SUSAN M AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 16007 FOXNOOR DRIVE 72206 888-9519 DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN H TEACHER 8 OAK FOREST PLACE 72113 851-3682 EANS, SYLVERENE G TEACHER 804 EAST 31ST 71601 536-0183 GERSHNER, VICKI M TEACHER 20621 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 72135 868-5209 HALEY, LETHA J WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 6920 MORGAN DRIVE 72209 562-6314 HARRIS, BRENDA G TEACHER 17409 BRADSHAW ROAD 72206 888-3646 HAYMAN, KIMBERLY B SCHOOL NURSE 72209 HICKS, BARBARA A TEACHER 5813 BASELINE #153 72209 HICKS, KATHLEEN F TEACHER 7407 HENDERSON ROAD 72210 455-4807 HOLLINGSWORTH, JIJ\u0026gt;Y A TEACHER 25 DELLWOOD 72209 HOOD, KAYE AIDE SUPERVISION 7424 SHADY GROVE LANE BOX 72103 562-5943 ISBELL, PAMELON J TEACHER 7008 GUINEVERE DRIVE 72209 568-1402 JOHNSON, BRENDA F TEACHER 1419 COLLEGE 72202 372-0388 JOHNSON, DEBRA J TEACHER 6307 DENHAM 72209 JOHNSON, JORGE A TEACHER 1400 OLD FORGE DR APT 220 72207 228-5240 KERR, PAULA D TEACHER 2615 FLAKEWOOD 72207 664-9514 KESTERSON, ELIZABETH W TEACHER 27 dNGSBRIDGE 72212 224-7823 LAMBERT, BRENDAL TEACHER 924 COMMERCE APT 15 72202 372-0810 LOVE, VICKI L TEACHER #42 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE 72058 679-3487 LUCY, BRENDA F MEDIA CLERK 9413 COISTOCK 72209 562-7152 MADDOX, CYNTHIA I TEACHER 1412 POINT WEST DRIVE 72211 221-3411 MALLETT, ORA D TEACHER 2415 JOHNSON 72204 661-0743 MATLOCK, NANCY S TEACHER 8901 KENNESAW 72103 455-2640 MCDOWELL, PATSY L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7009 GUINEVERE 72209 565-6618 MCILROY, JILL M TEACHER 4 HUNTINGTON ROAD 72207 225-4720 MIMS, RICHARD L TEACHER 10714 WARREN 72209 568-3123 MIMS, SANDRA J TEACHER 10714 WARREN DRIVE 72209 568-3123 MITCHELL, DIONNE E AIDE SUPERVISION 11401 MESA DR APT F249 72211 221-7057 MOORE, CARRIE L TEACHER 2200 RICE 72202 372-6447 MOORE, SHIRLEY A WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 9503 SOUTHWEST DR 72209 562-1120 MORGAN, LULA CUSTODIAN 4813 W 23RD 72204 664-2547 MORGAN, SHIRLEY A TEACHER 27 POINTER DRIVE 72002 455-4257 MURPH, KATIE F TEACHER 1916 WIGWAM 72032 329-0478 NEAL, LINDA K TEACHER 10009 FORRESTER COVE 72209 562-6283 PETTUS, IDA M TEACHER PO BOX 191042 72209 565-9164 PICKAIID, JIMMIE M WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 8 WESTMONT CIRCLE 72209 562-7581 PRESLAR, OTIS M ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL P.O. BOX 23233 72221 228-9976 PUCKETT, PAIGE C TEACHER 1411 N SHACKLEFORD APT B n211 225-oon ROSE, SARA G TEACHER 8109 MELLWOOO ROAO n204 568-7587 SABO, DEBBIE L TEACHER #16 BURNTTREE COURT n212 SHANKS, BETH L TEACHER 1710 CALGARY TRAIL n211 I SIMPSON, KIMBERLY D TEACHER 88 ROSElJNN n205 227-5356 SMITH, ALMA F COONSELOR 5421 DREXEL n209 562-1552 SMITH, RUFUS CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 15621 ALEXANDER ROAO noo2 455-1933 SMITH, SARA WORKER ELEM FOCX) SERVIC 6201 SENATE n209 568-6938 STORAY, JAMES CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 8401 W 36TH ST n204 568-m4 SUMMONS, ELOISE W CUSTOOIAN 2109 BOULEVARD STREET n204 666-8967 THOMAS, MATTIE M AIDE REGULAR Bll)GET 1801 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE n204 TIDWELL, CATHY V AIDE REGULAR Bll)GET 1603 CHESTER APT 202 n206 374-4091 TORAN, STEVE A TEACHER 7515 GEYER SPRINGS #78 n209 568-1793 TUCKER, WILLIE L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 2824 HARPER ROAO no1s 776-2346 WALKER, CAROL A AIDE SUPERVISION 10718 GALLAHAD n209 562-0101 WALKER, CONNIE S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 41 WELLFORD DRIVE n209 565-2173 WATKINS, RENEE L AIDE SUPERVISION 11500 CHICOT ROAO APT 23 n103 568-4803 WELLS, JEANNIE L TEACHER 7311 OHIO n201 WILLIAMS, ERMA J TEACHER 6605 ONYX DRIVE n209 568-6186 WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 923 CONNER AVENUE I n202 376-8012 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY Principal: Frederick Flelds 6500 Hinkson Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4055 BETTON, SHERRIL TEACHER 6210 SHIRLEY DRIVE n204 663-6188 BUETTNER, SALLY G TEACHER 2904 SALLISAW DRIVE n116 835-5800 CRISS, PAULINE W AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 9704 COISTOCK n209 CUNNINGHAM, ELLENS TEACHER 7905 BRIARWOOO CIRCLE n205 225-3340 CURRY, JOANN SCHOOL NURSE 1923 MICHAEL DRIVE n204 227-6854 DEDMON, NANCY A CUSTOOIAN 1113 RINGO n202 374-8702 DRIVER, OCIE A AIDE  FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 3801 PINE CONE n209 565-1694 ELLIS, EDDIE M TEACHER 5120 WEST 24TH n204 664-1352 EPPERSON, BECKY J TEACHER 4511 BOWERS n204 565-9618 FIELDS, FREDERICK L ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5900 BUTLER ROAO LYNDELL n209 562-3334 FLANAGAN, VETA TEACHER P.O. BOX 4441 n116 666-0122 GREGORY, NEA C AIDE SUPERVISION 6414 BASELINE RD APT 126 n209 HALL, DONNA R TEACHER 9621 COISTOCK ROAO n209 565-8677 HIGGINS, NETTIE SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 9416 WOOOFORD DRIVE n209 565-2377 HOBBS, BARBARA A CUSTOO IAN  HEAD 15019 RENA ROAD n206 888-6508 JACKSON, BENNIE AIDE REGULAR Bll)GET 2108 BOULEVARD n204 664-7713 KLING, ALISA D TEACHER 112 LOWER RIDGE ROAD no32 327-9544 LANGSTON, CALVIN AIDE SUPERVISION 10200 JIDY LANE n209 LEIGH, MARGARET A TEACHER 12604 JANELLE n212 224-5520 MCCARTHER, GERALDINE TEACHER 2002 SHUMATE DRIVE n212 MCCLAIN, MARION K TEACHER 10 WINDY COURT n201 227-8842 MCCLINA, MARY AIDE SUPERVISION 11620 WARREN ROAO n209 565-3662 MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M TEACHER 27 DOVE CREEK n116 835-1383 MILLER, GLORI~ K TEACHER 1100 PATTON PLACE n205 223-2238 MOSBY, LORRAINE L COUNSELOR 2607 DAISY COVE n204 NAGEL, DIANA K TEACHER 5219 HAWTHORNE n201 666-0060 NORMAN, CHERRY G LIBRARIAN 1901 BROKEN BOW n116 834-2097 PENNY, JACQUELINE F TEACHER 5n1 CARLYLE DRIVE n209 568-2158 PHILLIPS, PENNY D MEDIA CLERK #8 WILLOW OAK COURT n211 RAND, ALI CE C ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE n204 ROLAX, SHIRLEY A TEACHER P.O. BOX 17362 n111 945-2174 SANDERS, NORMA J AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 9613 MELON n103 557-5939 .... SIMPSON, ANGIE .M SIMS, SHIRLEY C SMITH, ARBRADELLA B SNOl,OEN, SALLIE R SOLEE, DEBORAH L STUART, DOROTHY J TRIPCOIIY, WALDA D VANECKO, ALICE F WATERS, DORIS Z WILLIANS, JEFFERY TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTODIAN CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 6300 Hinkson Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4085 ABLES, FRANCES M ANDRESS, WILLIANS ANDRUS, GEORGE C BAILEY, JOHNNY BATTIE, LINDA S BENSON, JESSIE J BEST, CHARLOTTE V BRADFORD, GAYLE B BRAGG, ALLEN R BROOKS, MARTHA J BUFFALO, SUE Y BULLOCK, PATRICIA A BURNETTE, DENNIS R CAPOOT, MICHAEL G CHAMBERS, ANTHONY D COGSHELL, CARL L CRIPPS, JOSEPH D CRISWELL, DONICA M CURRY, JOANN DAVIDSON, KATHY L DAVIS, MARCUS D DAVIS, PHYLESIA DUERR, DONNA P EARLEYWINE, SONYA G EDWARDS, NORMA C ENOCH, LYDIA L ESAU, ERNA J ESTES, WILLIAN E FISHER, KENNETH L GAINES, SARA E GILBERT-WISE, M BARBARA GOLDSBY, LAVERNE G GRILLO, THERESA L GULLETT-SHELNUTT, TAMARA HAMILTON, ORALYN S IIARRIS, ANNITHA J HARRIS, SHARON D HAl.'KING, NANCY G HILL, KATIE A HUNT, SAMUEL JOHNSON, JOHN C JOHNSON, VIOLA TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER COJNSELOR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER REGISTRAR WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER BUILDING ENGINEER TEACHER TEACHER COJNSELOR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 8802 BOULDER LANE 6916 CLOVERDALE #4 TIMBER VALLEY COVE 18 LONGSTREET DRIVE 2618 SOUTH MAIN STREET RT 3 BOX 762 6904 SKYlXX\u0026gt; #6 MALCOLM P.O BOX 55 # 2 SOUTHAVEN 72207 72209 72204 72206 72206 72104 72207 72209 72079 72209 Prlnclpal: Gayle Bradford 124 PINE VALLEY RD 3019 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE 1908 SYLVIA STREET 6617 MEADOWLARK LANE P.O. BOX 440 13200 CHENAL PARKWAY #205 7312 RICHlXX\u0026gt; 4716 EASTlXX\u0026gt; 3713 PINECONE DRIVE 1107 RONlXX\u0026gt; DRIVE 6705 lXX\u0026gt;FIELD 1820 SANFORD #1 5903 TROUT #20 YORKTON 1715 JOHNSON #10 CHRISTY LANE 1812 RESERVOIR RD #217 1923 MICHAEL DRIVE 420 MESA DRIVE APT H25 2310 Rc41NE ROAD 3419 ARAPAHO TR 105 ENGLElXX\u0026gt; ROAD 16509 OTTER CREEK PARKWAY 4222 AREHART DRIVE 35 SUGAR BERRY 7311 KENTUCKY STREET 11401 MESA DRIVE APT 322 7900 BURNELLE DRIVE 2403 S. LOUISIANA STREET 2024 SOUTH SUMMIT 7210 AMHERST DRIVE 62 CHEROKEE DRIVE 5 RIO GRANDE FOREST 1701 WESTPARK APT 238 1726 DURlXXl STREET 2902 HINSON ROAD 1019 NORTH POLK 5813 BASELINE RD APT 76 72207 72207 71923 72209 72002 72002 72211 72207 72204 72209 72207 72209 72207 72002 72209 72204 72118 72205 72204 72211 72204 72209 72207 72209 72209 72209 72065 72207 72211 72209 72206 72204 72205 72002 72212 72204 72015 72212 72209 72006 72205 72209 225-0373 568-2615 562-5820 490-2431 332-8671 664-5089 562-0015 397-2723 562-5097 663-6100 228-5416 246-6211 455-5633 225-0590 663-4404 568-6847 568-5559 225-4531 565-7235 227-9093 794-0990 565-6530 851-6515 227-6854 223-9758 223-3072 666-3918 455-1447 568-7088 888-3630 663-1111 227-0668 565-5813 375-9522 372-4015 847-0712 224-7256 n8-6213 223-3335 347-2031 568-8272 JONES, JACK A KIRCHNER, LESSIE A LAMB, CAROLYN F LEAKS, ALVESTER LESTER, PATTY A LOVELACE, DOROTHY J MARTINEK, DARLENE B MAYBERRY, BONNIE B MCFADDEN, CHARLES MCKENNA, JULIANNE MILLIGAN, JENNIFER H MITCHELL, SANDRA A MOHUNDRO, THOMAS S MOSELEY, FRAN N NIEDERBRACH, JAY A OSHIRO, NIDIA PALMER, BARBARA S PARKER, PATTI J PATTERSON, DAVID H PIKE, PERRY R POORE', PATRICIA A RALEY, BEVERLY A RELFORD, YOLANDA L RUSH, LAWRENCE R SAMONS, KATHRYN M SEAWOOD, GREGORY E SIMPSON, MITCHELL SMITH, GAIL P SMITH, SUSAN M SOUTHERLAND, TERRY D STARLING, LILLIAN L TOMLINSON, E. LIANNE UICETUI, !ICE T VANPELT, SHARON E WALKER, AUDREY M WARREN, JUDITH L WASHINGTON, DWIGHT B WASHINGTON, ESTHER M WEBB, THOMAS C WHITEHEAD, SHELIA L WICKLIFFE, ALICE E WILLIAMS, BRUCE B WILLIAMS, HENRY L WILLIAMS, SYLVIA WOLFE, CAROLYN S COUNSELOR TEACHER TEACHER ACTING ASSISTANT HEAD CUS WORKER JR HIGH FOCD SER TEACHER SECRETARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOCD SER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER MEDIA CLERIC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER MANAGER  JR HIGH FOCD SE TEACHER CUSTOOIAN  ASST HEAD SECRETARY ATTENDANCE TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOCD SER TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE CUSTOOIAN CUSTOOIAN TEACHER DODD ELEMENTARY 6423 Stagecoach Rd Little Rock, AR 72204 455-7430 BEALER, LINDA F BLUE, SUSAN D CHILDERS, SUSAN B CHILLIEST, WANDA J DAVIS, DORIS J DAVIS, NANSI ICAY DAVIS, PHILLIP L AIDE REGULAR Bl.tlGET TEACHER TEACHER AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC WORKER ELEM FOCD SERVIC TEACHER TEACHER 1100 N. RICHARDSON PLACE no, AMHERST 10813 VALIANT DRIVE 306 SHORT 7704 BERT MARSH LANE 8 BLACKJACK COURT 4 PEBBLE BEACH COURT 2501 BENNETT ROAD 2319 N ARTHUR 11 CHERRYWOOD COURT 5808 11811 STREET #38 1215 WOOOLAND PARK RD 7312 11H11 STREET 6900 CANTRELL APT D-3 8201 ORCHARD DRIVE 7518 REDWOOD 9224 WEST MARKHAM 9522 NORTH POINT ROAD 3618 SHAMROCK DRIVE 49 SOUTHERN OAKS P.O. BOX 4483 601 NAPA VALLEY DRIVE #21 10 NOTTINGHAM ROAD APT 2 8016 WINTERWOOD DRIVE 1434 WEST BASELINE #3 ARAPAHO COURT 2105 CEDAR CREEK ROAD 3125 HWY 5 N 223 FOUNTAIN 9 N. MEADOWCLIFF P.O. BOK 2692 303 WEST IIJII STREET 1504 GLENDA DRIVE 2651 BRUCE 5805 EAST 46TH STREET 2104 MADISON 803 CARMICHAEL 43 WARREN DRIVE APT #37 401 WEST 22ND STREET 3200 GILMAN 5323 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD no22 n205 n209 n111 n103 n204 n212 no15 n204 n201 n201 n211 n205 no15 n205 n201 n209 72209 72205 72135 71603 72209 72214 72211 72205 72209 72209 72209 72116 no15 72205 72209 n203 72116 72205 72032 72117 72204 72022 72209 72118 72209 72114 72204 72207 Principal: Patricia NcNeal 915 SOUTH OAK 11300 VINE STREET 35 SOUTH WOODLAND DRIVE 504 HARRINGTON AVENUE 9711 MELON LANE 2217 LOOICOUT 2205 FOREST CREEK DRIVE 72204 72103 72032 72202 72103 72032 72211 847-4884 661-0932 565-1069 888-7646 455-3913 224-4634 778-6587 664-2888 661-9256 223-2735 562-1390 847-4046 280-9712 562-2262 568-6750 227-4885 868-4774 879-5316 562-8860 227-0229 664-7256 562-3826 455-1954 835-8144 847-4327 375-1622 565-7497 562-6602 753-3693 223-2294 327-4762 945-0585 663-1335 847-3149 664-3871 225-4124 225-2063 663-0848 455-1036 327-3089 374-4656 557-2615 327-3342 221-9016 DAY, LORICE AIDE SUPERVISION 17f3 EAST 19TH STREET n202 374.5493 DENTON, YVETTE N TEACHER 801 S. ROONEY PARHAN #35E n205 221-3082 DOSS, JIIINY F AIDE SUPERVISION 6811 HINKSON ROAD n209 FLANAGAN, VETA TEACHER P.O. BOX 4441 n116 6660122 FLEMING, DEOOIS D TEACHER 10 LAMONT DRIVE n209 FRAWLEY, ELIZABETH J TEACHER C/0 J STEVENS 14700 H~ 1 noo2 HARE, VALERIE T TEACHER 18 WINDSOR DRIVE n209 5627147 HENRIKSEN, ANITA N TEACHER 3105 DOGWOOD TRAIL no32 3279801 HUIE, WANDA L TEACHER 2818 SALEN ROAD no15 7944063 IVORY, JOSEPH CUSTOOIAN 32D5 BATTERY n206 3748313 JACKSON, VERNITA FAYE TEACHER 5300 BASELINE APT 128 n209 5683704 JEFFERSON, CYNTHIA B TEACHER 5813 BASELINE ROAD #235 n209 568-1362 JOHNSON, SOL04011 CUSTOOIAN 3116 BISHOP n206 3745228 KENNEDY, BARBARA A LIBRARIAN 21 HAYFIELD n201 224-9703 LEWIS, PATSY N TEACHER 83 PLANTATION ACRES DRIVE n210 4555829 MAJOR, JACQUELINE CQJNSELOR 10002 RONALD DRIVE n205 225-2856 MARTIN, MAL I NOA H TEACHER 4710 SAN PECK RD APT 1195 n212 2247459 MCNEIL, PATRICIA A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 2812 RESERVOIR ROAD n205 221-1608 MEEKS, JULIE A TEACHER 11217 SHACKLEFORD COURT n211 223-2085 KITCHELL, BEVERLY S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 313 WEST 33RD PLACE n118 753-6144 MITCHELL, VICKYE Y TEACHER #7 BLACKJACK CT n204 4550857 NAGEL, DIANA IC TEACHER 5219 HAWTHORNE n201 666-0060 NORTHCUTT, DENISE E KEDIA CLERIC 702 NORTH OAK n110 354-1292 PARKER, ANGELA R AIDE SUPERVISION 3018 WOLFE n206 376-0396 RAINES, ANNIE N TEACHER 5609 NORTH LOCUST n116 758-4093 RIDDLE, BRENDA J TEACHER 3301 WEST 10TH n204 6631519 SHERIDAN, WILLIAN L TEACHER 9201 KANIS ROAD 15-G n205 2241148 SMITH, VALERIE J ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 510 S. MAPLE n205 666-4980 SNYDER, FLOYD R CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 13201 PITTS ROAD n206 888-7633 STEELMAN, CAROLYN C TEACHER 6500 LONGIIOOO n201 664-1692 THOMAS, DARLENE C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 8706 HERRICK LANE n209 5658757 THOMAS, JIMMIE D MANAGER ELEMENTARY FCXlD 64 WEST WINDSOR n209 562-2906 WORKMAN, HELEN J WORKER  ELEM FCXlD SERVIC 15420 SARDIS ROAD n103 847-3791 DUNBAR JR. HIGH Prlnclpal: Nancy Acre 1100 Wright Ave Little Rock, AR 72206 324-2440 ACRE, GLENDON L TEACHER 68 PIN OAK LOOP n113 8513886 ACRE, NANCY L SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 68 PIN OAlC LOOP n113 8513886 AVERY, BELINDA CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 3719 WEST 11TH n204 AX, EDITH R TEACHER n201 2234898 BELL, LINDA IC TEACHER 32 PARK HAVEN DRIVE n205 225-3109 BLACKSHER, RODERICK L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 6414 BASELINE APT 32 n209 3750422 BRADLEY, MILDRED CUSTOOIAN P.O. BOX 164116 n216 3749531 BROWN, MICHAEL L CUSTOOIAN P.O. BOX 4394 n214 223-9598 BURGESS, RYAN ROCHELL TEACHER 431 MCCAIN BLVD HIGHCLIFF n116 791-0043 BURK, BOBBYE H TEACHER 10910 BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE n211 224-0265 BURNS, JOE TEACHER 87 BAME CIRCLE no22 847-2857 CARTER, LINDA B WORKER  JR HIGH FCXlD SER, 1214 WEST 24TH STREET n206 374-0423 CARTER, MELBA D TEACHER n118 CLARK, ALICE Z REGISTRAR 3 ROSEMOOR DRIVE n209 568-0652 CLAYBORN, NATHAN L TEACHER 6901 CAMELOT n209 568-5828 COLE, BETTYE A TEACHER 1316 WEST 21ST STREET n206 375-5945 COLE, JUDY IC SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 9017 DAWN DRIVE n103 8884178 COLLINS, JULIE MARTIN TEACHER 601 NAPA VALLEY n211 COOK, CHARLES J TEACHER 11810 PLEASANT RIDGE #601 n212 223-2741 COWELL, JEFFREYS TEACHER 88 WEST WINDSOR n209 DAVIS, RICHARD A COUNSELOR 13601 BECKENHAM n212 2286638 DEAN, OSCAR L TEACHER 1901 STYLER STREET n204 663-3528 DICKERSON, BOBBIE J MANAGER JR HIGH FOOD SE 4101 LUDWIG n204 DONOVAN, FAITH R TEACHER 68 WARWICK DRIVE n205 2252159 DUKE, LORRIE ANN TEACHER #24 SYLVIA no32 329-8868 DUNN, RHONDA T TEACHER 14309 HIGHPOINT DR n211 EDMONDS, NENA R TEACHER 2 EASTWDOD OAKS no32 3293410 FLANIGAN, LAURA A TEACHER 8900 TANYA DRIVE APT B n204 GEORGE, LI SA H TEACHER 611 COURT SUITE 3 no32 GRAVES, DON IC TEACHER #7 TW.IN PINE PLACE n209 455-5631 GROSS, JOHNNY E TEACHER 50 GLENMERE n204 663-7962 HARRIS, HERBERT E TEACHER 2824 GILMAN n204 HOBBS, LAWRENCE E BUILDING ENGINEER 15023 RENA ROAD n206 8882483 HOEY, MARYS TEACHER 6416 WOODFIELD DRIVE n209 568-5525 HONEA, ALI CE J MEDIA CLERK #1 .BAY MEADOW CT n209 562-0861 HOWARD, MARGARET A CUSTODIAN PART TIME 8421 WEST 36TH n204 2234859 HUDSON, ELOUISE J ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 18 SAXONY CIRCLE n209 562-2078 JACKSON, GERTIE B TEACHER 1309 HENDRIX AVENUE n204 JACKSON, HARRY B CUSTODIAN PART TIME P. 0. BOX 164116 n216 374-9531 JAMES, DONNELL ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR P.O. BOX 1134 n115 758-7012 JAMES, MARTHA M TEACHER 3552 N OLIVE n116 m-0751 JOHNSON, ISAAC L TEACHER 108 CALAIS COVE n211 JOHNSON, LARA D TEACHER no22 JONES, FREDDIE L TEACHER 9313 TIMBER VALLEY RD n204 568-8054 LEWIS, JOYCE A WORKER  JR HIGH F\u0026lt;XX\u0026gt; SER 7 BARBARA CIRCLE n204 LOGAN, ANDREW 0 TEACHER 500 TRIVISTA RIGHT 71913 623-9598 MCDONALD, THOMAS A .TEACHER 314 NORTH ASH n205 663-7063 MCGREW, MARILYN W SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 1101 N BRYAN n201 666-8457 MOORE, BABBYE R TEACHER 21 LEXINGTON DRIVE 71602 247.3n1 MUNDY, SAM T TEACHER 1226 WASHINGTON n204 MURRAY, LENORA E TEACHER RT 2 BOX 16 n064 255-3679 NEWTON, KENNETH TEACHER 614 VALMAR STREET n205 661-1581 OLDS, ARTHUR C TEACHER 23 SANDSTONE no32 329-6106 OSMON, DAVIDS TEACHER #21 LIBERTY CREEK no32 796-3049 PARSONS JR, ODAS E TEACHER 7617 BRIARWDOD CIRCLE n205 224-2410 PEACE, PAMELA J TEACHER 3704 DORAL n212 2278490 RICHARDSON, JIMMY L CUSTODIAN 1001 BOOKER n204 664-0314 ROBINSON, ROBERT F TEACHER 2501 RIVERFRONT DR APT B1 n202 663-9797 ROBINSON, VERA M WORKER  JR HIGH F\u0026lt;XX\u0026gt; SER 2301 STATE n206 374-5227 RODGERS, CLAUDIA A TEACHER 3 TALL TIMBER COVE n204 SHAVERS, GREGORY B TEACHER 208 EAST 44TH n111 945-7190 SLATER, JOYCE A COUNSELOR 412 SUNNYMEADE n205 2210755 SMITH, MARY A TEACHER 6307 SHERRY DRIVE n204 STANLEY, ROLAND J TEACHER 10300 JANA DRIVE n209 5622343 TAYLOR, FRANCES D TEACHER 3834 LOCHRIDGE n116 791-3070 TERRY, P. DAWN TEACHER n1u TOLLETTE, SAMMIE N LIBRARIAN 2715 S CHESTER n206 375-7896 UNDERWDOD, JOYCE M TEACHER 10918 YOSEMITE VALLEY DR n212 225-5755 WATSON, CHARLES E TEACHER 9220 CERELLE DRIVE n205 224-4734 WILBURD, MANYTHIA WORKER  JR HIGH F\u0026lt;XX\u0026gt; SER 1700 WEST LONG 1nH STREE n114 375-1944 WILLIAMS, STEPHEN G TEACHER 4423 WEYMOUTH DRIVE n209 5624893 WITTENBERG, LILLIAN P SCHOOL NURSE 7 WDODSONG n135 868-5088 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Barbara Means 616 N. Harrison St Uttle Rock, AR 72205 671-6260 BROWN, REBECCA A TEACHER 5217 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD 72207 6641734 BURCH, CLAIRE E MEAL TECHNICIAN FOOD SE 5817 \"C\" STREET 72205 6666674 CAMP, BRIGGETTE L MEOIA CLERK 3407 S CHESTER 72206 375-6820 CAMP, WINNIE S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 3423 CHESTER 72206 374-9545 CARTER, CALVIN ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 8111 WEST 33TH 72204 2254511 CHEATHAM, FLORENCE L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 1415 NORTHWICK COURT 72207 227-6452 DAILEY, GENEVA WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 2011 VALMAR 72204 DELOZIER, MARY GAIL TEACHER 801 SOUTH ROONEY PARHAM# 72205 EASON, TABITHA AIOE  SUPERVISION P. 0 BOX 151 72183 897-5160 HEAD, SANDRA L TEACHER 7820 WEST CAPITOL #1201 72205 HOLMES, MICHAEL E CUSTOOIAN 72205 ISUM, MARGARET V LIBRARIAN 1915 KIMBERLY DRIVE 72205 227-6012 JAMES, CHARLOTTE A TEACHER #53 LAKESIDE DRIVE 72204 562-3696 JOHNSON, KEVIN AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1305 VINE STREET 72114 3752210 JOUBERT, KATHY A TEACHER #3 HOGAN COVE 72113 851-3833 JUNIEL, KATHON TEACHER 8701 INTERSTATE 30 APT 17 72209 568-4186 KOOELL, VALERIE K TEACHER 25 COLONY 72207 2233888 LAMBERT, EDITH Y TEACHER 10100 SUFFOLK DRIVE 72204 LEWIS, LEE E TEACHER 5919 PECAN LAKE DRIVE 72204 MASON, ERNEST L CUSTOOIAN 3332 GREEN OR 72209 565-7680 MEANS, BARBARA W ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 33 MINE HILL DRIVE 72118 7538294 MOIX, DEBORAH A COUNSELOR 3 RUSSWOOO 72211 2251995 OGDEN, KAROLYN F TEACHER 2701 WENTWOCX\u0026gt; VALLEY DR 72212 225-6904 PARR, GLORIA L TEACHER 1919 S STATE 72206 372-2395 PEARSON, BOYCE TEACHER 2016 EAST 4TH 72202 3723267 POWELL, ROSIE M TEACHER P.O. BOX 225 72203 6640551 PRICE, BEATRICE TEACHER 4312 WEST 20TH 72204 6665686 RACKLEY, LINDA G AIDE SUPERVISION 3418 LONGCOY STREET 72204 RICE, OPAL E TEACHER 5013 STONEWALL ROAD 72207 663-5145 RILEY, LEAH A TEACHER 4314 woa\u0026gt;LAWN 72205 6669279 ROGERS, IDA L WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER ROUTE 1 BOX 181 72076 985-2748 SHERwoa\u0026gt;, SHERRY TEACHER 11907 PLEASANT FOREST ORI 72212 228-9278 SMITH, LUCILLE B AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 8 SAXONY DRIVE 72206 562-8423 THCIIPSON, SANDRA L TEACHER 501 NORTH MCADOO 72205 663-6055 TURNER, MARILYN E TEACHER 2921 LENNOX DRIVE 72204 2245148 WASHINGTON, COLA V WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 4815 WEST 11TH 72204 6645580 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH Prlnclpal: Richard Maple 5901 Evergreen Uttle Rock, AR 72205 671-6390 BAILEY, ROSALYN S TEACHER 3014 ECHO VALLEY DR 72207 227-5510 BEGGS, MELINDA J TEACHER 1200 CORNFLOWER 72116 8343456 BIRGE, ANN A TEACHER 108 GLEN DRIVE 72207 BLACK, LORI L TEACHER 610 CHAUCER 72076 985-1292 BLANZENSKI, REBECCA A BOOKKEEPER 512 GREEN MOUNTAIN CIR #1 72211 221  1096 BOI.OON, GENEVA AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 1112 PULASKI 72202 374-3604 BOYLE, JULIA L COUNSELOR 1720 EAST 38TH 72206 375-2646 IRAOSHER, PATRICIA J TEACHER 14923 CANTRELL 72212 8685389 BRIM, ANTOINETTE M TEACHER 2317 FOREST CREEK DRIVE 72211 2286173 BR I SC0E 111 , JOSEPH W TEACHER 1903 N MCKINLEY STREET 72207 6630953 BROWN, ADRIENNE TEACHER 1216 WEST 26TH 72206 374-5857 BRUCE-LIPKINS, ETHER L TEACHER 2310 SClJTH STATE 72206 375-5434 BUCKELEW, MACKIE G TEACHER 600 N HUGHES 72205 663-7963 BUFFALO, SUE Y COUNSELOR 1107 RONWOOO DRIVE 72207 225-4531 CAMPBELL, PATSY R COUNSELOR 4309 NIN STREET 72205 663-1508 CARR, RONALD L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4704 PRINCETON 72204 664-6162 CARR, STEPHANIE B TEACHER 1 PCM\u0026gt;ERHORN COURT 72212 221-2581 CLAYTON, TERRY L TEACHER 1910 N TYLER ST 72207 COBBS, MARY J TEACHER 1301 WEST 1nH 71603 536-7170 COLE, LEIGH TEACHER 7500 EVERGREEN 72207 664-5811 CRAIG, SHERRY A TEACHER 14601 RIDGEWOOO DRIVE 72211 223-8582 CRCJ4EDY, VERNON TEACHER 1105 S CLEVELAND 72204 CROSS, NANCY B TEACHER 3301 ROCKY COURT 72207 223-2679 DAVIS, LAVERA J TEACHER 3 PATRICIA LANE 72205 227-4960 DODSON, VINCENT R TEACHER 6603 SHERRY DR 72204 DOUCET, KARIN P TEACHER 23400 LAWSON ROAD 72210 DREW JR, DANIELL TEACHER 19 KOKO 72120 835-0330 DUNCAN, DELOIS L WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 3605 ELAM 72204 DUNCAN, EDWARD A TEACHER 6310 SHIRLEY DRIVE 72204 664-2126 FINKBEINER, CHRISTIANNE TEACHER 6619 KAVANAUGH PLACE 72207 661-1523 FORE, LISA K TEACHER 205 CHIMNEY ROCK DRIVE 72116 834-5008 GILLUM, JO H SCHOOL NURSE 1704 TARRYTOWN 72207 225-1882 GREEN II, TROY W TEACHER #6 MERIDITH COURT APT NHN 72207 224-8403 GUY, MARY S TEACHER 2400 RIVERFRONT #2835 72202 663-5932 HARRIELL, LARRY L CUSTODIAN 923 MAXWELL 72202 376-7315 HENRY, JC TEACHER 7918 PARKWOOO DR 72204 225-4372 HENSLEY, ELSIE WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 4707 FOSTER 72204 562-0448 HILL, DORA B WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 13309 ASHER ROAD 72206 897-4376 HOLLOWAY, GLENN TEACHER 2109 ROMINE 72205 JENKINS, PATRICIA R ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5411 WEST 13TH 71603 562-6679 JOHNSON, ANNIE M WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 72205 JOHNSON, VIVIAN E TEACHER 1805 WEST 18TH 72202 376-3901 JONES, EDWARD L TEACHER 505 GREEN MTN CIRCLE #38 72211 228-7031 KIDD, LILLIE TEACHER 3625 VAUGINE 71601 534-4632 KORNEGAY, BETTY D LIBRARIAN 11 RIATA COURT 72209 565-0893 KRUGER, MARILYN A TEACHER 820 OUACHITA CIRCLE 72205 664-0807 MAPLE JR, RICHARD L SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 417 DEL RIO 72205 663-7919 MCCLELLAND, BERNARD CUSTODIAN 1120 RICE APT N 72202 MCFADDEN, SANDRA L TEACHER 6620 STERLING DR 72204 666-4288 MOORRAY, PATRICIA A ASST PRINCIPAL - SECONDAR 1 SPUR COVE 72211 223-5174 MILLER, EMMA A REGISTRAR 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD #175A 72207 228-7920 ltJELLER, CATHERINE J TEACHER #11 LUDINGTON COVE 72207 NICHOLS, ROBERT N TEACHER 11001 MERLIN COURT 72209 565-2617 NORRIS, MABEL WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 3411 WEST 10TH STREET 72204 NORTHCUTT, DENISE E MEDIA CLERK 702 NORTH OAK 72110 354-1292 NUNIS, HAROLD S TEACHER 6515 LONGlXD 72207 663-3356 PIKE, LISA R TEACHER 3655 HWY 60 72032 327-4461 POOLE, THOMAS TEACHER 12 BAY STREET 72204 227-4830 PURDY, MARY II CUSTODIAN - HEAD 122 WEST DRIVE 72015 n6-os12 RANKIN, SHARON L WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 16921 HWY. 10 72212 RUTTER JR, WILLIAM L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4900 PRINCETON DRIVE 72204 664-1152 ~HELMAN, SARAH E SECRETARY - ATTENDANCE 6612 GRANADA 72205 666-8838 STALEY, JERRY L TEACHER 515 WEST FIFTEENTH STREET 72202 376-1284 STOLZER, PATSY N WORKER - JR HIGH FOOD SER 36 GOLDLAKE CLUB ROAD 72032 STRIBLET, PATRICIA AIDE - REGULAR BUOGET 1104 W 29TH 72206 375-0793 TATE, HELEN M TEACHER 7101 MABELVALE CUT-OFF 72209 568-4220 TAYLOR, DIANNE F TEACHER 803 COUNTY CLUB RD 72116 835-6864 THESSING, GLENDA C TEACHER 504 TRUMPLER 72211 223-3531 THOMAS, MICHAEL C TEACHER 2803 CHARTER OAK 72207 225-2950 THOMASON, MARIAN II TEACHER 2500 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE 72207 225-4851 THOMPSON, LAWRENCE CUSTOOIAN  ASST HEAD 2106 S HARRISON 72204 6661919 TOOO, LINDA E TEACHER 624 CHOCTAII CIR 72205 6661249 TUCK, VIRGINIA C TEACHER 49 BRADFORD 72207 2250357 IIALLACE, DORA J TEACHER 2112 RCl4INE ROAD 72205 2280623 IIASHAN, RICHARD R TEACHER #5 PINE BLUFF ROAD 72032 4703524 WEEMS, JOYCE 0 MANAGER JR HIGH FOOO SE 17102 N ALEXANDER RD LOT noo2 IIHITEHORN, DANIEL II ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 12903 MORRISON ROAD 72212 2285325 IIILLIAMS, GINGER L TEACHER 1532 0AKIIOOO CIRCLE 72104 9222345 IIILLJAMS, KATHY L TEACHER P.O. BOX 4813 72214 IIILLIAMS, TONYA N TEACHER 3501 IIHITEFJELD 72204 2275883 IIJLLIAMSON, NANETTE E TEACHER 9909 SATTERFIELD DR 72205 2257133 ZAICRZEIISKJ, MERRY C TEACHER 7901 HENDERSON ROAD 72210 4550956 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY 1600 N. Tyler Principal: Virginia Ashley Little Rock, AR 72207 671-6267 ALEXANDER, CAROLYN A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7425 FAIRFIELD 72209 ALLISON, !DONAR AIDE SUPERVISION 3204 IIEST 13TH STREET 72204 6610372 ARNOLD, PORTIA M TEACHER 4223 GINGER DRIVE 72015 7941086 ASHLEY, VIRGINIA B ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11706 PLEASANT RIDGE DR# 72212 2252990 BATTS, KATHY M AIDE SUPERVISION 904 CAMPUS 72114 3748954 BOYCE, MARY L LIBRARIAN 2200 ANDOVER COORT APT 70 72207 225-12n BROWN, GEORGE CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 1410 SPRING APT 6 72202 CALLAHAN, STEPHANIE R TEACHER 2201 IIESTERMAN DRIVE 72015 m-0242 CLEMENTS, CAROLYN C TEACHER 415 NORTH PALM 72205 6648662 COLE, CAROLYN S NEAL TECHNICIAN FOOO SE 3226 BATTERY 72206 3766939 COLLINS, CYNTHIA R TEACHER 1221 RESERVOIR ROAD #273 72207 2213540 CCl4BS, BUENAH H TEACHER 6600 ICENIIOCO 72207 6666296 CRANER, KATHY L IIClRICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 431 MCCAIN BLVD 72114 7580916 DARBY, EVELYN J AIDE SUPERVISION 3001 EAST IIASHINGTON 72114 9453906 EVANS, MYRTLE D COONSELOR 2309 BATTERY 72206 3742931 FAULKNER, LISA E TEACHER 6412 A SANDPIPER 72205 6610205 GESTAUT, HELEN F TEACHER 11109 SABINE VALLEY DRIVE 72212 2239842 GHANT, JANET M TEACHER 1715 LEIIIS 72204 666-7054 GJNNAVEN, ELLEN J TEACHER 11714 PLEASANT RIDGE DR# 72212 2279072 GORDON, JANICE L TEACHER 10 SlJINERHJll CT 72211 2278857 HARRIS, EARNESTINE IIClRICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1720 BARROII ROAD APT 69 72205 2256563 HUNT, MARIETTA S TEACHER 1904 Nill CREEK 72116 n1-1418 KEARNEY, MAPLE J TEACHER P.O. BOX 45933 72214 5627348 KITCHENS, DON E CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 6105 BATTLE ROAD 72209 5688715 LANEHART, FRAN S MEDIA CLERIC 2700 MONTREAL 72204 2255981 LEMLE, NETTIE S TEACHER 72212 LUSBY, MARY B SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 216 SCHOOLIIOOO LANE 72207 664-3981 MACHEN, JA!IET A TEACHER 1427 N UNIVERSITY t N 328 72207 6667557 MEVAIIALA, BARBARA GAIL TEACHER 14309 SHEPARD DR 72212 868-4652 MOLDEN, HCU:R L CUSTOOIA!I 2117 SCl.lTH VALMAR 72204 6647388 MOORE, CYNTHIA C TEACHER 5024 STONEWALL 72207 6639185 PAIGE, CYNTHIA AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 1716 JUNIOR DEPUTY ROAD 72205 2219425 RUSSELL, TAJUANA I TEACHER 1809 TULANE AVENUE 72202 375.9570 SIGNAIGO, CYNTHIA L TEACHER 1517 ALBERTA 72207 2244378 STILES, DONNAN TEACHER 15 NOB VIEII 72205 2251607 TITSWORTH, TERESA L TEACHER 1802 ALDEN APT 1 72207 6647234 TURNER, ALVIN D TEACHER 206 RHONDA STREET 71923 246-7025 IIALLIS, ERICA LYNN TEACHER 3 STONEBROOK CClJRT 72211 2275033 I/ENGER, CAROLYN J TEACHER 18 HAYFIELD DRIVE 72207 2275381 IIHITEERIIIN, PATRICIA IC TEACHER #4 NOB Hill 72032 3275203 WILLIAMS, KENNETH L AIDE SUPERVISION 2123 LABETTE MANOR DR #21 n202 221-3760 WILSON, GLORIA P TEACHER 4216 TATUM n204 565-0483 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Franklin Davis 1701 South Harrison Little Rock, AR 72204 671-6380 ADAMS, PAMELA KATE TEACHER 501 NAPA VALLEY APT n5 n210 221-0269 ANDERSON, BARRY L AIDE DESEGREGATION 1000 VICTORY STREET n202 374-3679 BATSON, JIM P TEACHER 10 IIESTl,l()(X) LN n204 565-5905 BELT, RONALD C CUSTODIAN 607 IIEST 33RD STREET n206 568-82n BRADFORD, GLADYS M TEACHER 916 CONNER AVE n202 375-2704 BROW, CAROL A LIBRARIAN 1701 IIESTPARK #174 n204 663-3048 BRUCE, JACQUELYN D ACi\\DEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4913 IIEST 18TH n204 BUCK, JENNIFER L TEACHER 102 KEVIN COVE no22 847-0120 CALLAIIAY, MARSHA A TEACHER 1412 N. MELLON n201 666-7095 CARPENTER, MARYL TEACHER 33 OPHELIA DRIVE n113 851-3224 CARTER, KAREN A TEACHER 19118 DENNY ROAD n211 821-2113 CATO, VERNADA L ACADEMIC SUPPORT IIRITING 1702 ARROWHEAD RD APT A n118 791-0765 CHANDLER Ill, HILTON C AIDE DESEGREGATION 1009 MARTIN LUTHER ICING D n202 375-5654 COKELEY, GIIENDOLYN D TEACHER P.O. BOX 192884 n219 565-3601 COLEMAN, THELMA MEDIA CLERIC P.O. BOX 21512 n221 225-8281 CRENSHAW, ORAL CClJNSELOR P.O. BOX 7095 n116 834-5173 DAVIS, FRANKLIN A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11 MOCKINGBIRD LANE no32 3298n2 DAVIS, LANITA J TEACHER 21009 SARDIS ROAD n103 557-5924 DAVIS, WAVERLY Y TEACHER 2516 DORCHESTER DRIVE n204 223-2586 DOZIER, PRESTON CUSTODIAN 5201 GEYER SPRINGS APT 34 n204 568-7110 EDDY, JANICE M TEACHER P.O. BOX 360 no23 843-6466 FLEMING, TAMMIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT IIRITING 96 MONROE DRIVE n204 6619n2 FOWLER, EARLENE W TEACHER 1314 IIEST 15TH n202 375-9255 GARNER, DEBRA A TEACHER 5813 BASELINE ROAD #246 n209 565-8423 GETER, LAVERNE AIDE DESEGREGATION 2417 EAST 2ND n114 376-4592 GILES, ALMEDA TEACHER 1no BARROW RD. #96 n204 221-2779 GRAY, CAROLYN W TEACHER 1607 SHUMATE n212 227-5928 GRAY, LClJ A TEACHER 6315 GREENl,l()(X) n201 661-9324 HALEY, IRIS J l,IORICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC #7 SOUTHMONT DRIVE n209 562-8147 HAMMONS, BRENDA J TEACHER 35 NORTH MEADOWCLIFF n209 562-5244 HARDY, WILLIE D AIDE REGULAR BUlGET noo GLEN OAK DRIVE n209 568-6234 HARRIS, LUVENIA M AIDE SUPERVISION n204 HENRY, SADIE A AIDE FClJR YR OLD PROGRA 4n1 TIMBERLAND n204 455-1547 HIGHT, REBECCA R TEACHER 1808 MILL CREEK n116 758-8396 HOOO, MARTHA CAROLYN AIDE DESEGREGATION 1708 S HARRISON n204 661-0378 ISLAM, ARIE M AIDE DESEGREGATION P.O.BOX 192113 n219 568-6749 JACKSON, CYNTHIA M l,IORICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC n206 JACKSON, GLORIA J ACADEMIC SUPPORT IIRITING 5n1 TRENTON LANE n209 565-7811 JAMES, SANDRA S CClJNSELOR 3700 CANTRELL APT 709 n202 661-0531 JOHNSON, MARILYN F TEACHER #8 TANYA CClJRT n204 225-6918 JORDAN, DEMETRIA A TEACHER 529 MELANIE LANE n118 KEATHLEY, DEANA M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 8815 NANCY PLACE n204 562-4246 LAWRENCE, PAMELA E AIDE DESEGREGATION 3no TUDOR DRIVE n204 227-0638 LEE, WILLATHAL l,IORICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 3316 MARYLAND n204 MACON, BETTIE J l,IORICER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1301 SOUTH JACKSON n204 MATHENY, JUNE W TEACHER 8225 ALVIN LANE n201 MCCLENDON, ESSIE TEACHER 3700 BalERS n204 565-6353 MCFARLAND, BILLY C TEACHER 500 NAPA VALLEY DRIVE APT n211 223-2839 MCINTOSH, SANDRA G SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 5824 I/EST 14TH n204 666-1438 MCNULTY, LEANNE TEACHER n09 I/EST 29TH n204 227-6416 MONTGOMERY, JADE B TEACHER 2118 FAIR PARK BLVD. 72204 MYERS, TRACY LAND TEACHER 2221 N. MCKINLEY 72207 663-1068 PARISH, PATRICIA TEACHER 225 KEIGHTLY DRIVE APT B- 72207 664-1689 PERSON, PAMELA I TEACHER 5716 RANDOLPH RD 72116 758-0887 PHILLIPS, TABITHA L ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 1615 N. HUGHES 72207 663-6695 RIGGINS, LINDA J AIDE  DESEGREGATION 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON 72209 562-2357 ROBINSON, ALICE M ACADEMIC SUPPORT IIRITING 1403 SOUTH VAN BUREN 72204 ROLLINS, HELEN L SCHOOL NURSE 13400 MEYER 72103 455-2819 ROY, LORETTA AIDE  DESEGREGATION 5005 WEST 21TH STREET 72204 666-9487 SCHOEMAKER, EDNA R TEACHER 6612 POPPY DR 72209 562-6205 SCOTT, MONICA T AIDE CHAPTER I INSTRUCT 1915 SOUTH IZARD STREET 72206 372-3658 SCRUBBS, VERNA M TEACHER P.O BOX 23512 72207 223-4983 SHARP, CONNIE D TEACHER 6115 WEST MARKHAM APT 3A 72205 SMITH, BEVERLY A AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 804 WEST 24TH 72206 374-7798 SMITH, LEE M TEACHER 8 TOWNE COURT #12 72207 224-8913 STAGGERS, ANDREW AIDE DESEGREGATION 2600 SOUTH OAK 72204 666-7782 THORNTON, JOSEPHINE CUSTOOIAN  HEAD P.O. BOX 26 72053 490-0944 TRIMBLE, BETTY J CUSTOOIAN 2019 WEST 18TH ST 72202 375-2990 VINES, GWENDOLYN M AIDE DESEGREGATION 72206 WARE, KAREN J TEACHER 423 SOUTH 19TH 71923 \\ 246-9649 WEAVER, FRANCES I WORKER - ELEM FOOO SERVIC 6009 STAGECOACH ROAD 72204 455-1952 WINSTON, JANE A TEACHER 717 LEGATO 72205 227-4406 YOUNG, ELIZABETH MANAGER - ELEMENTARY FOOO 712 WEST 22ND 72114 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY Principal: Mac Huffman 300 Pleasant Valley Dr Little Rock, AR 72212 228-3080 ALEXANDER, CAROLYN A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7425 FAIRFIELD 72209 BAKER, SUSIE TEACHER 2704 CENTER 72206 375-9444 BLAINE, BARBARA B COUNSELOR 5 BERGERAC 72211 225-3267 BOGA, DIANE WORKER - ELEM FOOO SERVIC 8820 MIZE ROAD 72209 568-6871 BOREN, SYLVIA M MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 10224 JANA DRIVE 72209 565-6915 BREWER, GLORIA V AIDE - SUPERVISION 4608 PRINCETON 72204 664-8154 BROADAWAY, DONNA C LIBRARIAN 51 KINGS ARMS RD 72207 225-4180 BURNS, VALERIE J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1928 WEST 29TH 72206 375-6760 COLEMAN, THELMA MEDIA CLERK P.O. BOX 21512 72221 225-8281 COOPER, DOROTHY M TEACHER 10822 BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE 72211 225-6928 COURTNEY, JUDITH E TEACHER 3303 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE 72207 227-0468 CROCKRAN, GLORIA M ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 3224 SOUTH ARCH 72206 375-3342 OEADMON, CAROLYN F CUSTOOIAN 1310 ROCK STREET APT A 72202 376-4291 DUBOIS, BETTY F WORKER - ELEM FOOO SERVIC 16501 TAYLOR LOOP ROAD 72212 868-5787 FAUSETT, L YNOA M TEACHER 10709 PLATTE VALLEY DRIVE 72212 225-8803 FOOTE, CHARLES R TEACHER 3303 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE 72207 FREEMAN, BUFUS AIDE SUPERVISION 2520 DORCHESTER DRIVE 72204 224-4481 FRITZ, TERRY K AIDE CHAPTER I INSTRUCT 7601 NORTH CHICOT RD APT 72209 568-8665 GADDIE, OLIVIA S TEACHER 72207 GRAY, PEGGY A TEACHER 2620 CHESTER 72206 374-2430 GRINAGE, KIMBERLY L TEACHER 4804 PRINCETON DRIVE 72204 664-3249 HALL, CAROLYN L TEACHER 818 ARTHUR DR 72204 661-9582 HAMNONO, EILEEN A TEACHER P.O. BOX 23862 72221 HARRIS, SHARON R TEACHER #2 PLEASANT FOREST COVE 72212 224-0817 HIPP, BRENDA J TEACHER 10620 CRESTDALE LANE 72212 224-4117 HONORE'SMITH, KAREN P TEACHER 9203 TANYA DRIVE 72204 225-3101 HUFFMAN, MAC W ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 219 LINl,l()()O CIRCLE 72205 663-0513 HURD, JACK I ENEL TEACHER 7417 CHOCTAW ROAD 72205 666-7158 JACKSON, MONA RENEE TEACHER 10218 RONALD 72205 224-2982 JACOBS, JOAN ELIZABETH AIDE CHAPTER I INSTRUCT n205 JONES, BEVERLY ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 14107 HIGH POINTE DRIVE n211 225-n18 JONES, KAY TEACHER n212 225-0824 KEITH, BARBARA S TEACHER 6909 IIEST 34TH n204 562-1502 LOYALL, JULIA F TEACHER PO BOX 6098 n116 8356810 MILLER, MARGARET L \\olORICER  ELEM FOOD SERVIC 16504 TAYLOR LOOP ROAD n212 868-5804 PACE, MARTHA V TEACHER 15 MCGOVERN DRIVE n205 227-0285 PARKER, GERALD AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 5707 SONORA n209 371-0569 PENN, CARA L TEACHER 63 LAKESIDE DR n204 5682571 PERRY, LUCIA G SCHOOL NURSE 610 BEVERLY n116 8355m PITTMAN, CHARLOTTE M AIDE  TITLE VI B INSTRUC 4503 IIEST 11TH n204 666-8380 PITTMAN, DEVIN A AIDE SUPERVISION 4503 IIEST 11TH n204 6668380 PRICE, MARVIN IC CUSTODIAN  HEAD 924 JOHNSON STREET n204 PRU ITT, ROBERT AIDE SUPERVISION 1022 PULASKI n202 375-3528 REDD ITT, KAREN L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 69 ICINGSPARIC ROAD n201 225-0890 ROBERTO, LOIS C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #71 n201 ROBINSON, BEVERLY IC COUNSELOR 9 TALLYHO COURT no16 985-2375 SCARVER, DORIS L CUSTODIAN PART TIME 2405 DORCHESTER n204 228-6513 TABOR, GINA L TEACHER 2009 KAVANAUGH APT B n205 THOMPSON, MITZI A TEACHER #23 WILDI.IOOO DRIVE no23 USSERY, KAREN L AIDE SUPERVISION 7601 N CHICOT RD APT 3A n209 568-8665 WATSON, THELMA P TEACHER 1509 GEYER STREET n202 375-n86 IIESTLAICE, BEVERLY A TEACHER #8 RIDGEIIELL n120 8340544 WILLIAMS, !RISH A TEACHER 1601 N. SHACKLEFORD #207 n211 221-3421 WILSON, ALVIN CUSTODIAN 4023 LUGWIG n204 565-3650 WILSON, JULIA D TEACHER #2 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE no32 329-4239 WOOLLY, CAROL J TEACHER 30 PAMELA DRIVE n201 224-5341 WYATT, JOYCE L REGISTRAR 109 PEBBLE BEACH n212 225-9499 WYATT, MARIAN G TEACHER 36 TALLYHO LANE n201 225-8n6 GARLAND ELEMENTARY  Principal: Robert Brown 3615 W. 25th St Little Rock, AR 72204 671-6275 ARNOLD, THEESSA J TEACHER 4308 IIEST 13TH n204 666-1983 ATKINSON, KRISTY LYNN TEACHER 8 OHIO COVE n201 227-7091 BANKS, RICKEY D TEACHER 15 HOWELL DRIVE n204 221-2946 BEALER, CAROL F ACADEMIC SUPPORT WRITING n204 BOSLEY, MICHAEL CUSTODIAN  HEAD 2919 CENTER STREET n206 371-0343 BROWN JR, ROBERT L ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5000 N VINE n116 758-8709 BRUCE, JACQUELYN D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4913 IIEST 18TH n204 BUCKNER, KENNETH A AIDE DESEGREGATION n204 CALLAWAY, ANN W SCHOOL NURSE 120 NORTH lolOOOLAND no32 327-4647 CARR, MELANIE TEACHER 1931 MARTIN ST APT. G no32 329-1529 CLAYBORN, CHRYSTAL LANE TEACHER 601 RIDGEWAY APT C1 n205 6630170 COLE, BETTY J TEACHER 24623 SIMPSONVILLE LANE n211 821-2281 COLLIER, DELISA Y ' AIDE SUPERVISION 3302 SPRING STREET n206 375-7782 COX, MYRENE A MEDIA CLERIC 3121 HAZY RIDGE COURT n201 227-0323 DAILEY, MARYE AIDE DESEGREGATION n204 DANIELS, DOROTHY L AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 3200 CENTER n206 374-5645 DAVIS, PHILLIP L TEACHER 2205 FOREST CREEK DRIVE n211 221-9016 DAWKINS, CAROLYN ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 1713 EAST 21ST n202 3n0930 EICWOROMADU, YOLANDA D TEACHER n209 FANSLER, BARBARA I AIDE DESEGREGATION 2909 W 25TH n204 664-5289 FELLS, JOSEPH AIDE SUPERVISION n204 GREEN, MICHAEL B TEACHER P.O. BOX 443 no53 490-1855 GROSS, DEBBIE C TEACHER #3 DEBBIE CIRCLE n209 HALL, GRACIE J HAMPTON, VALDA D HANDY, ROSIE L HARDIN, CASANDRA ANN HARRIS, BOBBIE C HINES, BEVERLY J HOUSE, KEITH L JESTER, LINDA JONES, CHERYL T JONES, DAVID L LEWIS, MARGARET A MCBRIDE, DOROTHY L MIRANDA, CARLA J MOTTIN, MICHELLE S NELSON, REBECCA M NORWOOO, FAYE C RICHARDSON, ANNIE L RICKS, SHAWN D ROBERTS, KATHLEEN H ROBINSON, MARLENE M RODGERS, Jll\u0026gt;Y C RUNION, DIANNE C RYNDERS, MICHAELE SIMS, SHARON R SLATER, LEROY SMITH, MARY C STANSBERY, ANITA L TAYLOR, MONICA TROTTER, MARTHA A WATSON, TONYA WILLIAMS, RACHELL WILSON, EDDIE L WILSONROBINSON, PERRYLYN WYATT, JANICE IC YOUNG, CORAL TEACHER AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY/ED AIDE REGULAR BUDGET WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER LIBRARIAN TEACHER MEAL TECHNICIAN FOOD SE TEACHER AIDE  DESEGREGATION TEACHER AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE TEACHER TEACHER AIDE TITLE VI I INSTRUC TEACHER TEACHER CUSTODIAN AIDE SUPERVISION SECRETARY PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN  PART TIME ELEMENTARY IV TEACHER AIDE REGULAR BUDGET GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 5240 Mabelvale Pike Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4160 ALLEN, ROSALYN C BELL, CLOIS L BOHRA, REBECCA L BOX Ill, DAVID H BRIGHT, GLADIS BROWN, THISSIE L COOPER, JUANITA COUNTS, CARLA M COX, ELEANOR V CRAIG, DEBORAH L CROFT, BRENDA M DOUGLAS, PATSY G DLMAS, JOSEPHINE FARLEY, KATHEY D FELDER, ARTHUR L GILBERT, JEAN H GINGERICH, TAMARA L WORKER  ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION CUSTODIAN AIDE SUPERVISION AIDE SUPERVISION AIDE  REGULAR BUDGET ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER LIBRARIAN AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER TEACHER 1723 S. TAYLOR 3701 Lll\u0026gt;WIG 22 KINGSPARK DRIVE 2600 HIGH 2000 JR DEPUTY ROAD noa OAKRIDGE 4 PHYLLIS COURT 1910 SOUTH JOHNSON 13003 EL ROAD 1414 SCOTT STREET 11006 LEMONCREST LANE 2205 STATE 4223 WEST 25TH STREET 1902 CROSS 7117 SHAMROCK DRIVE 1212 DORTCH LOOP 1601 N SHACKLEFORD BLGD4 P.O. BOX 5785 201 SPRINGWOOO DR 3524 GUM STREET 1604 SCOTT APT B 5000 WEST 29TH 431 MCCAIN BLVD APT 225N 801 S RODNEY PARHAM #9H 1924 WEST 29TH n204 n204 n164 n113 n206 n206 n205 n210 n116 72204 no16 n204 n206 n206 n209 n206 n204 n206 n205 n205 n118 n205 n111 n211 n215 n211 n218 n206 n204 n204 n120 n204 n116 n205 n206 Prlnclpal: Eleanor Cox 8711 BOULDER LANE 2912 RESERVOIR 6401 SHIRLEY DRIVE 39 REGINA CIRCLE 2124 LABETTE MANOR DR APT 2116 SINGLETON COURT 6310 ASHER AVENUE #619 9219 TIMBER VALLEY ROAD 11901 PLEASANTREE DRIVE 2409 BLACKWOOO ROAD 9303 TANYA DRIVE 1830 SCHILLER STREET 935 HOGAN LANE 6116 ARBOR COVE APT 3 6311 SHERRY DRIVE 5514 DEVONSHIRE COURT n209 n201 n209 n204 n209 n205 72204 n204 n204 n211 n201 n204 n202 no32 n209 n204 n209 6666198 5628576 8510208 3753197 2275106 8353709 9852836 6638354 8882873 455.5544 3744267 3710225 6632778 2239315 2255936 3n5338 8358635 2210421 3753176 2285327 2212992 6636492 5687328 2248089 5689471 5681106 22s-n14 6643378 374-4200 3271765 5623931 562-6852 G\\IIN, LISA IC TEACHER 1210 KELLOGG ROAD n120 834-4218 HARTMAN, KRISTI MAREE TEACHER 3022 WARE STREET n204 568-9934 HAYMAN, KIMBERLY B SCHOOL NURSE n209 HIGHTOWER, NITA J TEACHER 7900 WEST 25TH n204 224-1765 HI LL, DOLORES J TEACHER 5201 PRIMROSE n209 565-5616 JONES, MILDRED B TEACHER 1617 SOUTH CLEVELAND n204 663-5855 ICVZER, ADAM MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 7825 HOMESTEAD DRIVE n103 888-5046 LANEHART, FRANS MEDIA CLERIC 2700 MONTREAL n204 225-5981 LEE, SANDRA L TEACHER P.O. BOX 2 n061 679-4710 MIDDLEBROOKS, MICHELLE R TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PARKWAY APT n211 225-2663 MILLER, PATTY R TEACHER 501 NAPA VALLEY #706 n211 223-2937 MOOIIE, LORETTA AIDE SUPERVISION n209 568-8139 PARKER, LINDA F COUNSELOR 15017 WEST BASELINE ROAD n209 PEEK, PEGGY R TEACHER 1607 MClJNTAIN DRIVE n201 223-8533 PETERSON, DOROTHY T TEACHER 2124 LABETTE MANOR DR #S n205 PHILLIPS, ESSIE M AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1918 BRAGG n206 376-9350 PRICE, CINDY C TEACHER n205 664-5911 REED, ALFREDA M CUSTODIAN 6600 LANCASTER, APT 57 n209 562-8506 REESE, JONELL WORKER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 12410 HILARO SPRINGS ROAD n206. 565-m9 ROSBY, KIMBERLY SECRETARY PRINCIPAL n209 565-2036 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 6200 ASHER AVE APT #176 n204 STUBBLEFIELD, EVELYN D TEACHER 2124 LABETTE F-21 n205 221-n61 WILBARGER, TCJ4MIE AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 3624 WALKER n204 565-2673 GIBBS MAGNET Principal: Donna Davis 1115 W. 16th St Little Rock, AR 72202 324-2490 ARMSTONG, DOROTHY W AIDE - SUPERVISION 3111 IZARD n206 3n-1155 BARBEE, BOBBIE J AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1712 WOODROl,I n204 664-4124 BLOME, CAROLYN H TEACHER 27 PAMELA DRIVE n201 227-5276 BONTON, JOVONDA D CUSTODIAN 5520 MARTIN n206 897-4517 BRYANT, Jll\u0026gt;Y E COUNSELOR 415 TURKEY CREEK ROAD n132 DAVIS, DONNA J ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 609 NORTH BRYAN n205 666-1271 FIELDS, LEOLA H ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE P.O. BOX 190901 n219 562-2756 FOSTER, NANCY TEACHER 52 TALLYHO LANE n201 227-7181 GIVENS, LINDA AIDE SUPERVISION n204 GONTERMAN, VICKI L TEACHER P.O. BOX 502 noo2 847-3485 GRAYSON, ICAYREN G TEACHER 7822 BRIARWOOD CIRCLE n205 225-1557 GUINN, HUBERT F TEACHER 13 LAKESIDE DRIVE n204 562-0382 HAMILTON, NANCY P TEACHER 6 ROANE CIRCLE n204 663-7657 HERNDON, SHARON R SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 9011 HERNDON ROAD n204 562-8496 HOLMES, MARGARET C TEACHER 2921 YOUNG\\IOOD n212 663-1498 HURD, ANN J TEACHER 9224 DUKE DR n204 225-56n JONES, MARY R TEACHER 3210 WEST 16TH n204 ICEOl,IN, ADA L TEACHER 10513 DIAMOND DRIVE n209 562-4162 KIMBALL, BEATRIZ M TEACHER 128 GLEN DRIVE 72207 664-0285 KITCHEN, CLARA M CUSTODIAN 6105 BATTLE ROAD 72209 568-8715 LAVEY, CATHERINE L LIBRARIAN 501 N BRYAN 72205 666-5072 LEWELLEN, WILHELMINA E TEACHER 1922 WOLFE n202 372-5612 LUZZI, PATRICIA C TEACHER 9 BERGERAC LANE 72211 221-1189 MCCUIEN, ANGIE G WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 2306 WEST 18TH 72204 376-0011 MITCHELL, NANCY B TEACHER 105 HEATHERBRAE COURT 72116 835-0287 , NEWSOME, PAMELA F TEACHER 2208 SOUTH MONROE 72204 01NEAL, EARNEST L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4920 AUGUSTA CIRCLE APT G n118 PERRY, LUCIA G SCHOOL NURSE 610 BEVERLY n116 8355m PURVIS, SUSAN T TEACHER 3001 OZARK STREET 72205 663-9242 RAMIREZ, MARIA IIORKER  ELEM FOOD SERVIC 821 JEFFERSON 72204 372-4474 RAYFORD, ESSIE R MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOD 4712 GRAIIO 72204 666-8387 ROBINSON, SUSIE A TEACHER 1605 WINBOURNE DRIVE 72116 771-1678 SHUFELBERGER, CAROLE TEACHER 505A MIMI 72211 228-9156 SHUMATE, CARL E CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 2522 RINGO 72206 372-4647 SINGER, PATRICIA K TEACHER 8101 CANTRELL ROAD #1205 72207 223-8794 TALLEY, SHIRLEY A TEACHER 17 BEAUREGARI\u0026gt; 72206 490-0961 TARKINGTON, SUSAN D TEACHER 5 BELMONT DRIVE 72204 568-4517 TAULBEE, CARYN L TEACHER 13000 MORRISON ROAD 72212 224-7252 THRASHER, EUNICE M TEACHER 2000 DENNISON 72206 374-0528 WALTERS, ALICE H TEACHER 2706 ECHO VALLEY 72207 223-4997 WHITESELL, JEANNE S TEACHER 7800 WEST 25TH 72204 225-8503 WILIIANKS, SANDRA L MEDIA CLERK 9 LAVER CIRCLE 72209 455-3318 WILLIAMS, DONALD W TEACHER 216 WEST 20TH STREET 72206 375-0937 WILSON, ELIZABETH A TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PKWY APT 850 72076 223-4965 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Principal: Dr. Victor Anderson 6700 H St Little Rock, AR 72205 671-6200 ALLEN, CLAREMCE TEACHER 1124 PEYTON 72204 753-3132 ALLEN, DONALD CARL SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 9314 TIMBER VALLEY RD 72204 565-4982 ALLGOOO, EMMA J AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 4301 MARYLAND ST. 72204 661-9052 ANDERSON 111, VICTOR SECOIIOARY PRINCIPAL PO BOX 3353 72203 821-6263 ANDERSON, DIANE TONEY IIORKER  ELEM FOOD SERVIC 4504 WEST 2nH 72204 664-5514 ANDERSON, MARYL IIORKER  SR HIGH FOOD SER 4119 TATUM STREET 72204 565-3468 ANDERSON, PHILLIS L TEACHER 72207 ARTHURS, JANE G TEACHER #11 FOXHUNT TRAIL 72207 224-4388 BAKER, CARLA S IIORKER  SR HIGH FOOD SER 1304 MARLYN DRIVE 72205 223-9844 BANKS, WANDA F SECRETARY GUIDANCE 14 DARTMOOTH DRIVE 72204 224-2071 BENTLEY, PAMELA B TEACHER 1000 N MELLON 72207 661-1369 BISBEE, CHERYL A IIORKER  SR HIGH FOOD SER 16509 TAYLOR LOOP RO 72212 BLAKELY, TERESA K TEACHER 220 NORTH TYLER 72205 666-7181 BONA, PATRICIA C TEACHER 315 N. MISSISSIPPI 72205 664-1432 BRANT, DENNIS R TEACHER 3525 LAKEVIEW ROAD 72116 753-9190 BRATTON, DONALD E TEACHER 9724 SATTERFIELD 72205 225-5461 BREWER, ROSEMARY M TEACHER #4 HAYFIELD DRIVE 72207 225-9661 BREWSTER, MARILYN J ASST PRINCIPAL SECONOAR 44 KINGS PARK 72207 224-4099 BROOt(S, EMANUAL TEACHER 4322 ZION STREET 72204 568-0734 BURTON, MARVIN L TEACHER 1505 S. CLEVELAND 72204 280-0817 BYNUM, LARRY D BUILDING ENGINEER 106 ESSEX CClJRT 72076 982-5628 CARPENTER, CHARLENE D COONSELOR 8705 LABETTE DRIVE 72204 225-9622 CHATMAN, DENNIS R CUSTOOIAN 1401 BRC41N STREET 72204 CIRKS, GEORGE E TEACHER 6900 SHAMROCK 72205 664-6418 COCHRAN, BRYANT J TEACHER 1106 RONWOOO DR 72207 227-0105 COLLINS, JUDYTHE L TEACHER 31 WHITE OAK DRIVE 72032 327-8610 CRAIG, SHERRY A TEACHER 14601 RIDGEWOOO DRIVE 72211 223-8582 CYR, BETTY M REGISTRAR 7185 MILL ROAD 72103 888-5052 DACE, SAM H COUNSELOR 49 DACE PLACE 72032 327-1011 DANIELL, JAMES T TEACHER #9 BETSY LANE 722D5 246-8684 DAVIS, FAITH E TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PKWY #810C 72211 224-5789 DIETZ, KAY M TEACHER 8714 BOULDER LANE 72207 225-5585 DUNAHUE, OTIS C CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 4217 WEST 18TH 72204 664-5396 DYER, LENORA A TEACHER 2 INDIAN TRAIL 722D7 225-6274 EASTER, ELIZABETH L TEACHER 5323 OPAL DRIVE 72076 988-9714 FLETCHER, SEAN M TEACHER 801 SOUTH ROONEY PARHAM# 72205 223-4741 GAGE, MARY J TEACHER 16 BUGLE CClJRT 72207 225-4998 GREEN, CHRISTI NE TEACHER P.O. BOX 46363 72204 225-0655 GROCE, VIRGINIA A TEACHER 14 BREEDS HILL COURT 72211 225-4123 GUNTER, AMELDA IC SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL #9 POINTE CLEAR DRIVE 72212 225-9760 HASBERRY, ELNAR TEACHER 5319 SOUTHBORO DRIVE 72209 565-3255 HOLDEN JR, WILLIES ACTING ASSISTANT HEAD CUS 1622 HANGER 72202 372-7085 HOPE, BARBARA W BOOKKEEPER 2201 WEST ROAD 72207 666-9101 HUMPHREY, VERNITA T TEACHER 2115 SOUTH ARCH 72206 375-3345 JAMES, GENEVA C WORKER SR HIGH FOOO SER 2623 BROADWAY COORT 72206 JARMON, MYRA M TEACHER 1705 MISSOUR 71601 534-1174 JAY, CHARLENE V MANAGER SR HIGH FOOO SE 5424 JONES LOOP ROAD 72211 821-2438 JOHNSON, BARBARA WORKER - SR HIGH FOOO SER 1304 SOUTH TAYLOR 72204 666-0237 JOHNSON, BETTIE CUSTOOIAN 2916 SPRING 72206 JOHNSON, ELOYCE CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 2211 S PINE ST 72204 375-5948 JOHNSON, Jll\u0026gt;ITH IC AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 7011 HILLWOOO ROAD 72207 666-8179 JOHNSON, llNDRUE M TEACHER 1404 WEST 18TH 72206 JONES, LINDA S TEACHER 30824 BANDY ROAD 72211 821-4902 ICELLEYBREW, CAROL M WORKER  SR HIGH FOOO SER ROUTE 1 BOX 317 72142 961-9111 ICING, SUSAN L TEACHER 2305 CARY DRIVE 72015 n8-0697 LANGFORD, CLIFFORD H TEACHER 6905 FLI NTROCIC 72116 834-2888 LASKER, ALBERTA TEACHER #4 LASKER LANE 72032 470-1147 MADDI SON, SUE TEACHER 6503 CANTRELL ROAD 72207 666-1127 MALONE, HOSEA D TEACHER 420 EAST ARNOLD STREET 71857 753-1243 MANTELS, AL IT A I TEACHER 1601 N BRYANT SUITE 10 72207 661-1604 MATHIS, BARBARA S TEACHER 1556 SKYLINE DRIVE 72116 753-5254 MCDONALD, BENNY D SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 72117 MCDONALD, Tl NA WORKER - SR HIGH FOOO SER ROUTE 1 BOX 246A 72016 333-2482 MCGEE, EARNEST E TEACHER 18519 FAWN TREE 72209 455-1536 MCKINNON, LONA G TEACHER 7 liOOOLORE COURT 72211 225-1\"998 MEADOWS, MARY JANES TEACHER 12514 COLLEEN DRIVE 72212 221-3001 MILLER, BRUCE W TEACHER 5715 C STREET 72205 664-6707 MOSELEY, CHARLES F TEACHER 8 NEWSTEAD 72209 565-7904 NELSON, TRACEY A SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 72204 NIEDERBRACH, TINA F TEACHER 7312 \"H\" STREET 72205 280-9712 NORDMAN, ANTJE H TEACHER 712 NORTH TAYLOR STREET 72205 666-0671 NORMAN, B08BIE J TEACHER 4 HOWELL DRIVE 72204 225-0852 NORMAN, LEOLA P TEACHER 1102 S ARTHUR DR 72204 664-1304 NORTON, MICHAEL TEACHER 11721 ASHWOOO DR 72211 227-8013 OWINGS, SHEFFIELD L TEACHER 4 BROADVIEW TERRACE 72207 664-2796 PHIPPS, FLORENE J TEACHER 121 NORTH DRIVE 72032 470-3333 PORTER, LINDA M COUNSELOR 10702 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE 72212 224-4942 POWELL, JAMES E ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 3 KARON CT 72205 225-1086 ROBERTSON, AUlRON S LIBRARIAN 3224 SUMMIT CT 72207 225-6173 ROOGERS, ANDREW E ACTING HEAD CUSTOOIAN 3411 PINE CONE DRIVE 72209 568-9218 ROGERS, VIVIAN A WORKER  SR HIGH FOOO SER 2912 S. HARRISON 72204 376-0051 RUNSHANG, MARYE TEACHER 4907 HAWTHORNE 72207 666-2150 SANDERS, MARY IC TEACHER 6921 AMHERST 72205 664-5844 SCHARFF, REBECCA Q TEACHER 18 WHITE ASPEN COURT 72212 225-4558 SHORT, DEBORAH W TEACHER 8523 LEATRICE 72207 224-9160 SMITH, THOMAS P TEACHER 322 N PINE 72205 661-9176 STUCKEY, BRENDA J TEACHER 9705 BROOICS COURT 72205 224-6144 TERRY, ANGELA Y TEACHER 301 ICINGS ROW DRIVE #309 72207 280-9415 TRICE, Jll\u0026gt;Y M TEACHER 181 PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE 72212 225-7365 TURNER, DOROTHY J CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 817 CARSON STREET 72202 376-8407 VALDEZ, MELINDA M TEACHER 2603 STEPHANIE DRIVE 72206 888-1301 WADE, ROY L TEACHER 6809 INCAS 72116 834-7126 WALTON, GEORGIA C TEACHER 3316 W 16TH 72204 666-7524 WARREN, SUZANNE N MEDIA CLERIC #20 WESTCHESTER COURT 72212 868-4532 WASHINGTON, JAMES L ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 14404 liOOOCREEIC 72211 225-2432 WATSON, GLADYSTINE TEACHER 416 WEST 25TH 72114 753-8640 WATSON, MARYLEE R TEACHER 1724 FAIR PARK BLVD 72204 664-2447 WILEY, SHIRLEY WILLINGHAM, ELIZABETH WILSON, RICHARD L WOOD, PAULA IC WRIGHT, ELIZABETH A YATES, MARY P YEATMAN, JANICE R ZINK, JlllY R CUSTODIAN PART TIME TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER HENDERSON JR. HIGH 401 Barrow Rd Little Rock, AR 72205 228-3050 AYRES, KATHRYN A BAKER, FRANK BATES, MICKEY L BATSON, NENA I BEAVERS, EMMA J BISBEE, KATHLEEN BOLTON, JOYCE M BRADLEY, ROZALYN M BROADNAX, WILLIAM E BROOKS, WILLIAM H BUCK, LAWRENCE J BURKEPILE, WILLIAM L BURNETT, NANCY E BURTON, KAYE L CAROLINA, DANICA COLEMAN, NANCY K COLLIER, CLEOPHIS DAUGHERTY, SHERRY E DEPRIEST, PATRICIA S DERRINGTON, LOIS M DICKINSON, PATRICIA 0 DIXON, PAMELA B FISHER, RICHARD H FLETCHER, VICKI M FRENCH, MARY GERARD, NELLIE C GILLIAM, CANOY GRANT, JAMES T GUEST, JULIA M GUPPY, GEORGIA T HENDERSON, BETSY D HENSON, KATHYE HINTON, TANGIE L HIVELY, LYNNE M. HOLCOMB, KIM L HUFF, THELMA L JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, MARY V JAMES, Rll\u0026gt;OLPH E JOHNSON, CHARLIE JONES, KAREN K JONES, LEON KELLEY, MARILYN G KELLY, TERETHA E TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR MANAGER JR HIGH FOOD SE CUSTODIAN TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY ATTENDANCE COUNSELOR TEACHER AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC COUNSELOR LIBRARIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER AIDE TITLE VI B JNSTRUC TEACHER AIDE TITLE VJ B JNSTRUC TEACHER TEACHER CUSTODIAN TEACHER TEACHER 10307 INDEPENDENCE LANE 510 ARTHUR DRIVE 215 DRYAD LANE 3007 ALAMEDA DRIVE 506 HALL DRIVE 319 BEECHWOOD 20 ICJNGSPARIC ROAD 1 SONATA TRAIL n209 n204 n2os n204 n205 n205 n201 n2os Principal: Clell Watts 7005 GRACE ROAD 1601 N. SHACKLEFORD #105 11824 SHAIINEE FOREST OR 10 WESTWOOD LN 6410 SHIRLEY OR 715 OSAGE DRIVE 2323 BROWN 10613 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE P.O. BOX 505 7808 LASSIE LANE 1612 MARLYN DRIVE 10 PINTO POINT 1501 SHUMATE #16 MANSFIELD DRIVE 1812 OLD FORGE OR 1903 SOUTH GRANT 2101 SOUTH MARTIN 10 GOLDEN OAK COVE 1002 N SHACKLEFORD RO 7117 NEAL CREEK ROAD 604 NORTH OAK ROUTE 8 BOX 795  21 WINDY OAKS COURTS 6600 EAST SARDIS ROAD 2415 CROSS 2812 GAINES STREET 820 TEAL DRIVE 14219 COUNTY FARM ROAD 1010 S ARTHUR OR P.O. BOX 24626 205 WEST 4nH STREET 4710 SAM PECK ROAD #1042 P.O. BOX 432 15 MANSFIELD DRIVE 5408 VALLEY DRIVE 2101 ROMINE ROAD 13111 MARKHAM ST APT 51 2906 DORSET 2035 KING CIRCLE 2715 CROSS 15 INVERNESS CIRCLE #3 UTICA LANE n209 n212 n212 n204 n204 n132 n204 n212 n203 n202 n204 n205 n211 n212 n209 n201 n204 n204 n212 n211 n211 n205 n104 n205 n065 n206 n206 no32 n212 n116 n204 n221 n118 n212 no33 n209 n209 n205 n211 n204 no32 n206 n212 n204 663-8157 663-3009 227-4891 562-9445 663-5878 663-1694 225-49n 225-1704 562-6168 565-5905 666-2300 397-7027 663-2881 227-5536 663-7579 227-9464 227-4639 225-6483 664-0255 225-9082 868-4112 666-3802 337-1292 888-8653 376-2576 376-6205 327-3530 227-7365 835-8455 227-6338 327-3783 568-9412 568-3723 221-0135 225-9274 326-0162 376-3551 223-2295 ICING, DEBORAH A BOOICICEEPER 5 BLACKJACK COURT n204 LEIIIS, LOUIE TEACHER 3302 LEHIGH DRIVE n204 225-1850 Lill, MYRREL L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 7001 AMHERST DRIVE n205 664-9469 LM, DEBRA II TEACHER 1420 BRECKENRIDGE APT 125 n201 224-4249 MANN, TRAVIS D TEACHER 215 NORTH ASH n205 661-0302 MAPLE, CATHERINE P TEACHER 417 DEL RIO n205 MARBLE, JOY Z REGISTRAR 515 SHAMROCK DRIVE n205 664-1122 MAXIIELL, AZZIE L IIORICER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 3708 LU\u0026gt;IIIG n204 565-6469 MAYERNICIC, DIANE C IIORICER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 1805 IIATT n201 225-6627 MCCARRELL, ETHELENE R TEACHER 11201 HICKORY HILL ROAD n211 221-7110 MCGINNIS, SHELLEY RENE TEACHER 322 FAIRFAX n205 MILLER, SUSAN P TEACHER 6718 KAVANAUGH PLACE n201 663-no1 MITCHELL, JOYCE A TEACHER 307 IIEST 19TH n114 n1-4975 MOOREHEAD, KENNITH D TEACHER #10 CHARLIE II. ROAD no32 329-8451 MORRIS, LINDA A TEACHER 288 JACKSON 312 no20 344-8266 NADLER, CAROL J TEACHER 3 FAIRBROOIC n205 227-4786 PICADO, ELENA TEACHER 6804 BURTON DRIVE n204 PIGGEE, CELESTINE TEACHER 8509 LABETTE DRIVE n204 PITTS, GAIL G ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 13609 llOOBROOIC n211 223-8903 PORCHIA, EDGAR A TEACHER 4304 AREHART DRIVE n209 PRICE, JAMES M TEACHER RT 1 BOX 236 no16 330-2570 RAGLAND, ANGELA D TEACHER 1960 ERBACH no32 329-8766 RAINS, MARTHA IC TEACHER 5415 SULLIVAN ROAD n210 821-2658 ROBERTS, VICKIE R AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 10107 PALO ALTO DR. n209 565-4954 ROGERS, SHERRY LYNN TEACHER 12904 PLEASANT FOREST n212 SCOTT, ORA J CIJSTOOIAN P.O.BOX 164081 n216 375-n63 SHIELDS, MOLLY T TEACHER 12 VICTORIA CIRCLE n113 851-6169 SHORTER, LARRY D CIJSTOOIAN 4023 LU\u0026gt;IIIG n204 SICOTICO, FRANCINE S TEACHER 4 CAMBAY COURT n211 223-2197 SLATER, CAROLYN A TEACHER 8405 LABETTE DR n204 225-8499 SLATER, IIILLIE TEACHER 9615 CERELLE n205 225-8642 SMITH, SHAROL IC TEACHER 6307 SHERRY DRIVE n204 666-6348 STIEDLE, JOYCE A TEACHER 1615 E TIIIN LAKES DR n205 225-6292 STMRS, IIANDA S TEACHER 33 ROBINIIOOO DR n201 225-6344 SIIANIGAN, BELINDA D IIORICER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 1869 IZARD STREET n206 376-1353 TAYLOR, CLAYTON L TEACHER #5 KATHY CIRCLE no32 336-9544 THOMPSON, TRACEY L TEACHER 1601 N SHACKLEFORD #403 n211 TURNER, RUTHY M CIJSTOOIAN 2501 II 16TH n202 375-7393 VALBRACHT, CAROL J TEACHER 2208 E CLELAND no23 988-1522 VANECICO, ANDREII P TEACHER 6 MALCOLM n209 VOEGELE, THOMAS H TEACHER 1069 DONAGHEY no32 329-7680 IIALICERIIHEELER, LISA T TEACHER 2314 IZARD STREET n206 IIALLACE, ROBERT BUILDING ENGINEER PO BOX 2121 n203 225-0781 IIATTS, CLELL SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 3701 DORAL STREET n212 227-4513 IIHITE, TONI D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 14620 IIILICS LANE n113 851-2387 IIILLIAMS, CYNTHIA H TEACHER 10112 HIGHIIAY 365 SOUTH n206 IIILLIAMS, EICLON C SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 2601 SOUTH OAK n204 IIILLIAMS, GARY D TEACHER 5704 E. ROOSEVELT n206 IIILLIAMS, ROGER N ASST PRINCIPAL SECONOAR 2507 GUNPCU\u0026gt;ER n201 225-5557 IIILLIAMS, VELMA J TEACHER 816 SKYLINE DRIVE n116 758-7962 IIILSON, RICHARD L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 215 DRYAD LANE n205 227-4891 J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Principal: Al Niven 13420 David o. Dodd Rd Little Rock, AR 72210 228-3100 BAILEY, MILTON TEACHER 103 ALIZA DRIVE n209 455-5857 BARNHILL, SAMMIE J TEACHER 959 WATKINS 72032 BARNHOUSE, CAROL TEACHER 1912 GUNPOWER 72207 225-4325 BATES, BETTY S REGISTRAR RaJTE 3 BOX 94 72086 676-3449 BENNETT, TANNY W TEACHER 11710 PLEASANT RIDGE #131 72212 BRYANT, DELOIS COONSELOR 801 CANTRELL APT 403 72207 221-9176 BURR, BETTY R ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 9 EVERT COORT 72209 455-0286 BURT, GERALDINE H WORKER SR HIGH foa) SER #4 WHITMORE CIRCLE 72206 375-7619 CALLAWAY, EVELYN J TEACHER 2802 RCJ41NE ROAD 72204 224-7816 CASTEEL, JOANN LIBRARIAN 10725 BRECKENRIDGE 72211 225-4103 CHRISTENSEN, ROSE M TEACHER 2308 PEACHTREE DRIVE 72211 6665420 CLEVELAND, KIMMIE R TEACHER 521 TREY LANE 72032 3272325 COOPER, JAMES L TEACHER 4206 LORANCE DRIVE 72206 888-2211 COX, CATHY J TEACHER 6716 ROCKWOOO ROAD 72207 DAVIS, MARIE SCHOOL NURSE 901 SOUTH JEFFERSON ST. 72204 663-9063 DEDMAN JR, JOHN L ASST PRINCIPAL  SECOHDAR 41 CREPE MYRTLE 72209 4554266 DELAMAR, CLYDE L TEACHER 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #75 72207 ENDERLIN, EVELYN H TEACHER 3111 PAINTED VALLEY DRIVE 72212 225-6159 ESKOLA, GLEN E TEACHER 1912 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR #3 72212 227-9640 FARNER, RITA D MANAGER  SR HIGH Foa) SE 3211 IIALICER 72204 224-1142 FARRAR, ELIZABETH J TEACHER 3714 OAKWOOO ROAD 72205 663-9628 FINCH, ALICIA I TEACHER 9 DEE DEE CIRCLE 72212 868-5356 FISHER, JONATHAN CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 46 IIHITMORE 72206 374-4400 FLINN, TIMOTHY P TEACHER 811 NORTH GRANT #8 72205 664-8832 FRIES, NICOLE M TEACHER 609 PEMBROKE 72116 835-0484 GLASSCO, BELINDA B TEACHER 6301 CAMP ROBINSON RD #25 72118 753-9041 GRAHAM, LAURA A TEACHER 9816 REGENT CIRCLE 72204 GRAY, VICKIE IC TEACHER 4014 POTTER 72204 565-4581 GRUMMER, WILLIAM J TEACHER #1 ROSEIICla) 72032 327-1177 HALL, LINDA L TEACHER 1316 ALABAMA 71601 536-1931 HARDIN, JLOITH IC SECRETARY GUIDANCE 1912 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR A 72212 223-2965 HARRISON, T.F KENNETH TEACHER 1 SHADY VALLEY CaJRT 72116 753-1461 HART, JLOITH N COONSELOR 700 EAST 9TH #7C 72202 HARTNESS, PAUL J TEACHER 919 CCXJLTER 72116 835-6936 HIETT, RUTHIE R TEACHER 9 LI SA CCXJRT 72212 224-1041 HOBBS, PAMELA A TEACHER 2 CANYON CCXJRT 72116 758-6141 HORNE, LISA IC SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 503 EAST 6TH STREET APT 2 72202 3761944 HOWARD, NANCY L SECRETARY  PRINCIPAL #3 HOGAN DRIVE 72209 565-4832 HULLUM, BRENDA S TEACHER 1923 NICHOLS 72205 225-8335 INMAN, ANN C TEACHER 2300 REBSAMEN #8205 72202 666-2848 JACKSON, CYNTHIA D TEACHER 1104 EAST 19TH 71601 535-8671 JACKSON, HERMAN L CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 5921 VALLEY DRIVE #7 72209 568-3723 JENKINS, PATRICIA R ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5411 IIEST 13TH 71603 562-6679 JOHNSON, JON M TEACHER 12\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1220","title":"Little Rock School District, personnel directory","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School administrators","School board members","School employees","School management and organization","School principals","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, personnel directory"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1220"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n1994 Personnel Directory LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AN ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION REPRESENTING THE INTERESTS OF THE LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S TEACHERS, CUSTODIANS, AIDES AND BUS DRIVERS \"OVER 25 YEARS OF OUTS'fANDING SERVICE TO OUR MEMBERS\" LRCTA AEA NEA STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY 1500 West 4th Street, Suite 305 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-3519 Little Rock School District Administrative Directory 1994 Zone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Board of Directors Director Term ends Dr. Katherine Mitchell 1996 Shorter College 604 Locust Street, NLR, 72114 374-6305 T. Kevin O'Malley 1996 Ark. Board of Review Tower Building - Suite 700, 01 324-9038 ank Bldg. ol Avenue, 01 John A. Riggs, IV J. A. Riggs Tractor Co. P. 0. Box 1399, 03 570-3528 Linda Pondexter Fuller Jr. High P. 0. Box 8601, 16 490-1503 Patricia Gee 8409 Dowan Drive, 09 562-0571 Oma Jacovelli 6622 Gold Court, 09 568-7585 1994 1996 1994 1994 Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2000 MAY 4 1994 Office ot Desegreg lion Mon,tori g LRSD Central Offices All Plexar Station (228, 324, 455, 570, 671) can be called by Curriculum 324-2010 dlaling the lut four-digit extenelon. For Information call Deaegregation 324-2000. Dr. Ruaeell Mayo, Aaeoc. Superintendent 324-2271 LOCATIONS Arma Hart, Deaegregation Facilitator 324-2109 LRSD Adminiatration Building 324-2000 Deputy Superintendent 324-2010 810 W. Markham, 72201 Eatelle Matthie, Deputy Superintendent Adminltration Annex 324-2000 Sterling Ingram, Aesoc. for Inst. to the Deputy 324-2124 100 S. Arch, 72201 Margaret Gremillion, Asst Supt. Elementary 324-2006 Adult Education 324-2260 Larry S. Roberteon, Aest. Supt.  Elementary 324-2007 1401 Scott St., 72202 Dr. Victor Anderson, Acting Aul Supt. Secondary 671-6200 Alternative learning Center 324-2370 Early Childhood Education 324-0517 800 Apperson St., 72202 Pat Price, Coordinator Cafeteria/Food Servicee 324-2250 English/Foreign Language/ESL 324-0513 1501 Jon .. , 72202 Gene Parker\nSupervieor lnetructional Resource Center (IRC) Exceptional Children 6th \u0026amp; Ringo, 72201 Gifted/Talented 324-2194 Computer Central 324-0515 Mable Donaldeon, Supervieor Early Childhood Education 324-0517 Special Education 324-2180 Englieh 324-0510 Dr. Patty Kohler, Director English Second Language 324-0510 Family Ufe Education/New Futures 324-0518 Foreign Languag\" 324-0510 Rene Carson, Coordinator lnetructional Madia Center 324-05n Federal Prograrn.iGranta 324-2110 Math 324-0520 Leon Adame, Director PAC 324-0525 Financial Services 324-2078 Reading 324-0526 Mark Milhollen, Controller Science 324-0518 Health Services 324-2161 Social Studi 324-0514 Gwan Efird, RN, Coordinator (beeper)569-0244 Staff Development 324-0500 HIPPY 324-2266 Metropolitan Vo-Tech. Ed. Ctr. 565-8465 Marian Shead, Supervisor no1 Scott Hamilton Road, 72209 Human Reeourc 324-2080 Plant ServicIMaintenance 570-4020 Dr. Richard Hurley, Director 3601 S. Bryant, 72204 Robert Robinson, Recruiting Coordinator 324-2088 Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management 324-2230 Information Servic 324-2055 1800 E. Sixth, 72202 John Ruffins, Interim Director Sefety and Security 324-2400 Instructional Resource Center 324-0518 1001 E. 21 St., 72202 Dennie Glasgow, Director Student Assignment Offices 324-2272 Insurance Office 324-2083 501 Sherman, 72202 KLRE/KUAR FM 569-8485 Transportation Dept. 570-4000 Regina Dean, Manager 5400 Murray, 72209 Labor Relations Quigley Stadium 324-2426 Bredy Gadberry, Specialist 324-2116 2409 W. 14th, 72202 Ubrary/lnstructional Tech 324-05n Lucy Lyon, Coordinator DEPARTMENTS Mathematics 324-0520 Adult Education 324-2260 Judy Trowell, Supervisor Paulette Martin, Director Carmelia Crawford, Specialist Athletic Department 324-2426 Kathy Daneahmandi, Specialist Busin Ed/Home EconomiC9 570-4043 Shirley Harper, Specialist CARE Program 324-2395 Docia Jones, Specialist Martha Rogers, Supervisor Trish Killingsworth, Specialist Cafeteria/Food Services 324-2250 Renee Kovach, Specialist Jackie Boykin, Director New Futures 324-2112 Communications Department 324-2020 Linda Young, Liaison Jeanette Wagner, Director Parent Involvement 324-0525 Community Education 570-4149 Catherine J. Gill, Coordinator Brenda Scrimeger Parent Recruiters 324-2288 Troy Cole, Recruiter Becky Rather, Recruiter Coordinator 324-2287 Ron looper, Specialist 324-0500 Partnel'9 In Education 324-2297 Su Walls, Specialist 324-0500 Debbie Milam, Coordinator Marian Woods, Specialist 324-0500 Pt-,nlng, R__,ch and Evaluation 324-2120 Stud nt Assignment Office 324-2272 Dr. Robert Clowers, Director Julie Wiedower, Student Assignment Officer Plant Services/Maintenance 57D-4020 Student Hearing 324-2169 Doug Eaton, Director Dr. Linda Watson, Officer Print Shop, Administration 324-2031 Substitute Office {SOS), 324-2091 Pupil Services/Drug Abuse Prevention 324-2162 Su Rodgers, Coordinator Marcy Eckolls, Asst. Coordinator 324-2090 Jo Evelyn Elston, Director Stud nt Records 324-2129 Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management 324-2230 Superintendent's Office 324-2100 Chartee Neal, Director Dr. H nry P. Williams, Superintendent. 324-2012 Reading 324-0526 Supply Center 324-2237 Allee Stovall, Director Leonard Willie, Manager RNOurces and School Support 324-2009 Trade/Industrial Ed. 570-4044 Safety and Security 324-2400 Transportation Dept. 570-4000 Bill Barnhouse, Director Bred ontgomery, Director Science 324-0518 Truancy Reduction Center 671-6397 Dennis Glasgow, Supervisor Darold Maxfield, Coordinator Vocational/Tech. Ed. Center 570-4043 Scott Field 671-6299 Carol Green, Director Social Studiee 324-0514 Vo-Tech Print Shop 570-4045 Marie A. McNeal, Supervisor 324-0511 Terry Kirkpatrick, Manager Staff Development 324-0500 Volunteers In Public Schools (VIPS) 324-2297 Donita Hudspeth, Director 324-0512 Debbie Mil m, Coordinator Paula Gri, Specialist 324-0500 ),Ji? II Administrative Staff ~ ~ Adams, Leon, Federal Programs Director ............ - ... -324-2110 cl 0 1 Adams, Polly, Voe. Ed. Secy ........................................ 570-4043 ~'J Adams, Wayne, Facil. Coor ........................................... 570-4020 ] Browning, Benita, Fin. Serv .......................................... 324-2069 Brumfield, Frank, IRC Security ..................................... 324-0526 Cadman, Suzanne, Student Hearing Secy ................... 3242169 Agnee, Jayne, Safety Supervisor, Transportation ..... 570-4000 Calhoun, Robert, Information Services ....................... 324-2106 Allen, Martha, Voe. Ed. Coun ........................................ 565-8465 Campbell, Sharon, Insurance Secretary ...................... 324-2083 Allison, Linda, HIPPY Aide ........................................... 324-2266 Caraway, G-n, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management .324-2242 And81'9on, John, Building Security Supervisor .......... 324-2400 Carpent, Sharon, Deseg. Data Entry Operator ........ 324-2289 Armstead, Vicki, Communications Secy ..................... 324-2020 Carson, Rene, Family Life Coordinator ....................... 324-0518 Armstrong, Carol, Exec. AHi. Support Services ....... 324-2009 Carter, Ouida, Athlellcs Secy ....................................... 324-2426 Armstrong, Ramona, Labor Relations Secy ................ 3242116 Cash, Willard, Trans. Mech ........................................... 570-4005 Armstrong, Sheila, Food Serv. Reimb. Coor ............... 324-2250 Cathey, ry, Financial Services ................................. 324-2066 Baler, Keith, Trans. Mech .............................................. 570-4005 Chapman, Susan, Sp. Ed. Supv. CBI ........................... 324-2176 Banks, Roland, Fed. Prog. Chapter I Coordinator ..... 324-2110 Choate, Betsy, Information Services ........................... 324-2033 Barnhouse, Bill, Safety/Security Director ................... 324-2400 Claypool, Ruth, Financial Services .............................. 324-2075 Bana, Marjorie, Evaluation Specialist ........................ 324-2126 Cleek, Janecla, Financial Services ............................. 3242065 Batee, Va, Federal Programs .................................... 324-2110 Clowllf'8, Robert, Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation ... 324-2120 Beard, Ken, FS Main. Tech ........................................... 324-2250 Cole, Troy, Parent Recruiter ......................................... 324-2286 Bennett, Pauline, Human Resources Secy. _ ............. 324-2089 Connolly, Robert, Systems Development Mgr ............ 3242058 Bennett, Tammy, Transportation Dept. Secy .............. 570-4000 Cooper, Floyd, Trans. Supv .......................................... 570-4004 Berkhan, Dan, Transportation, Shop Clerk ................. 570-4006 Cork , Sue, Reading .................................................... 324-0526 Bilal, B. J., Trans. Dispatch .......................................... 570-4012 Cox, Tanya, Fin. Serv .................................................... 324-20n Blagg, Lynn, English/Foreign L.angJESL Secy ........... 324-0510 Cranford, Joan, Fin. Serv .............................................. 324-2068 Bonds, Michelle, Switchboard Oper ............................ 324-2000 Crawford, Carmelia, Mathematics Specialist .............. 324-0520 Boykin, Jackie, Food Ser. Director .............................. 324-2250 Crawford, Pam, Computers Spec ................................. 324-0515 Braden, Carutha, Federal Programs ............................ 324-2110 Currin, led ye C., Secretary, Pupil Services ................ 324-2162 Bramlette, Nancy, Information Services ...................... 324-2063 Daneshmandi, Kathy, Mathematics Specialist ........... 324-0520 Brant, Dennis, Computers Spec ................................... 324-0515 Davis, Johnnie, Trans. Mech ........................................ 570-4005 Bray, Shirley, Fin. Serv .................................................. 3242071 Dean, Regina, KLRE/KUAR Manager ........................... 569-8485 Brewer, Jerry, Trans. Mech ........................................... 570-4005 De Vore, Dane, Trans. Supervisor ................................. 570-4008 Broughton, Thomas, Psychological Examiner ........... 324-2174 Driver, Juanita, Fin. Serv .............................................. 3242076 Brown, Paula, Visually Impaired Instructor ................ 324-2192 Donaldson, Mabl , Gifted/Talented Supervisor .......... 3242197 Brown, Willie, Adm. Bldg. Mgr ...................................... 324-2030 Dunbar, Ethel, Eval. Spec ............................................. 3242123 Eans, Bonnie, Com put Speclaliat ............................. 324-0S15 JonH, Robett, Safety and Security ............................. 3242400 Eaton, Doug, Plant Servicea/Maint. Director ............... 570-4022 JonH, Wendy, Construction Secretary ....................... 570-4028 Eckolla, Marcy, SOS A .. t. Coord ................................. 324-2090 Jordan, Brenda, Administration Custodian ................ 324-2030 Edwards, Diane, Student Records ............................... 324-2129 Jordan, Trey, Trana. Mech . ........................................... 570-4005 Efird, Gwen, Heelth Serv. Coordinator ........................ 324-2181 Joyce, Uaa, Reading Secy ............................................ 324-052'5 Ellis, Archie, Trans. Supv .............................................. 570-4001 Kelly, Doris, Pupil Services Secy ................................. 324-2182 Elston, Jo Evelyn, Pupil Services/Drug Abuse ........... 324-2182 Kendall, Doug, Coord., Environmental Protection ..... 570-4028 Eubanks, Gail, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management. SUpv. 324-2234 Kiilagaard, Sharon, Staff Dev. Secy ............................. 324-0500 Fella, Cedric, Trana. Mech ............................................ 570-4005 Killingsworth, Trish, Mathematica Specialist ............. 324-0520 Ferguson, Anne, Fam. Life/New Futures ..................... 324-0518 Knox, John, Food Serv. Warehouse Mgr .................... 324-2257 Forbes, Belly Jeen, Staff AHi. ..................................... 324-2100 Kohler, Patty, Special Ed. Director .............................. 324-2190 Freeman, Ann, Science Specialist/New Futures ......... 324-0518 Korte, Paula, Special Education ................................... 324-2193 Fry, Ben, KLRE/KUAR FM ............................................. 569-8485 Kovach, Renee, Mathematica Specialist ..................... 324-0520 Fulmet, Lena, Sp. Ed. Supv .......................................... 324-2183 Land, Kitty, Purchase Order Entry Specialist ............. 324-2240 Furr, Jean, Food Serv. Supv ..................................... 32422SO Leidigh, Lynn, Computer Specialist ............................ 324-0515 Gadberry, Brady, Labor Relations Dir ......................... 324-2118 Logan, Kelli, Division of Exceptional Children ........... 324-2193 Gardner, Gayle, Math Secy ........................................... 324-0520 Looper, Ron, Staff Development Specialist ................ 324-0500 Gentry, Ruthie, Student Assignment Office Mgr .. ...... 324-2271 Loudermilk, Tetry, Trana. Mechanic ............................ 570-4005 Gill, Catherine, Parent Involvement Coordinator ....... 324-0525 Luck, Liz, N-Futures Social Work ..................... 324-0518 Glasgow, Dennia,Science Coordinator ....................... 324-2011 Lyon, Lucy, Library Cood ............................................. 324-0577 Glenn, Randall, Special Ed ........................................... 324-2191 McCraw, Helen, Information Services ......................... 324-2059 Goodwin, ca .. andra, Substance Abuse Cood ........... 324-2167 McIntyre, Nina, Pay. Exam ............................................ 324-2173 Goza, Jean, Financial Services .................................... 324-2074 McMullen, Lille, Pay. Exam ........................................... 324-2171 Grable, Hazel, FS Bookkeeper ...................................... 324-2250 McNeal, Marie A., Soc. Studies Supervisor ................. 324-0511 Graves, Barbara, Sp. Ed ................................................ 324-2189 Martin, Paulette, Adult Eduction Director ................... 324-2260 Green, Carol, Vocational Director ................................ 570-4043 Matson, Lee Ann, VIPS .................................................. 324-2295 Green, Dorothy, Planning/Eva!. Secy ........................... 324-2120 Matthis, Eatelle, Deputy Superintendent ..................... 324-2011 I Gremillion, Margaret, Assist. Superintendent ............ 324-2008 Maxfield, Darold, Truancy Reduction Coordinator ..... 671-6399 Grier, Paula, Staff Development Specialist ................. 324-0500 Mayfield, Rhetta, Community Educ. Secretary ........... 570-4149 Griffin, Bevetly, Planning/Eva!. Secy .......................... 324-2124 Mayo, Russell, Auociate Supt. Desegregation .......... 324-2271 Griffin, Robert, Supply Cent AHi. Mgr ................... 324-2237 Milam, Debbie, VIPS Coordinator ................................. 324-2297 It Hackl, Joan, Computer Specialist ............................. 324-0515 Milam, Judy, Reading .................................................... 324-0528 Hamilton, Deborah, Trana. Disp ................................... 570-4012 Milhollen, Mark, Controller ........................................... 324-2078 Harris, Curtis, Supply Center ....................................... 324-2237 Millet, Brenda, Student Assignment AHi ................... 324-22n Harris, Rhonda, Plant Services Secy ........................... 570-4022 Montgomery, Brad, Transportation Director ............... 570-4000 Hart, Arma, Desegregation Facilitator ......................... 324-2109 Moore, Avia, KLRE/KUAR FM ....................................... 569-8485 Hayes, Steve, Maint. Supv ............................................ 570-4020 Moore, Cathine, CARE Coor ......................................... 324-2395 Haygood, Angelia, Special Ed. Secy ............................ 324-21n Moore, Muriel, Science Secy ........................................ 324-0S18 Harper, Linda, Sp. Ed. Secy .......................................... 324-2181 Morgan, Nancy, Information Services ......................... 324-2057 Harper, Shirley, Mathematica Specialiat ...................... 324-0520 Mouton, Valina, Information Ser. Operations Mgr ...... 324-2064 Hill, Claudette, Pay. Teat. Secy .................................... 324-2186 Murray, Fran, Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management ....... 324-2231 Hobby, Dr. Selma, Eval. Spec ....................................... 324-2128 Neal, Charles, Piocuiement Dil9Ctor ......................................... 324-2235 Hodges, Lala, VIPS ........................................................ 324-2291 Nebling, Brenda, KLRE Secretary ................................ 569-8485 Honorable, Maggie, Human Resources ....................... 324-2081 Newburn, Linda, Transportation Secretary ................. 570-4000 Huddle, Mary, Gifted Secretary .................................... 324-2194 Nichols, Joyce, Homebound Teacher .......................... 324-2180 Hudson, Valetie, VIPS ................................................... 324-2292 Norria, Margaret, Homebound Teacher ....................... 324-2180 Hudspeth, Donita, Staff Development Director ........... 324-0512 Norton, Faye, CARE ...................................................... 324-2395 Huffman, Kris, IRC ......................................................... 324-0528 O'Baugh, Randy, Aast. Warehouse Mgr ...................... 324-2257 Hurley, Dr. Richard,Human Resources Director ......... 324-2080 Odle, Vicki, Pay. Teat Secy ........................................... 324-2182 Humbard, Melissa, Information Services Secy ........... 324-2055 Paradis, Darrel, Procurement Contracting Supv ............ 324-2238 Humphrey, Theresa, Deaeg. Data Entry Opator ...... 324-2288 Parker, Gene, English/Foreign LangJESLSupv .......... 324-0513 Ingram, Starting, Assoc. for Instruction to the Deputy ..... 324-2124 Paul, Annita, Family Life Ed ........................................... 324-0518 Jack, Lynda, Div. Exceptional Children ....................... 324-2179 Pederson, Sue, Deaeg. Info. Mgmt. Coordinator ........ 324-2285 Jackson, Debbie, Information Services ....................... 324-2052 Penn-Norman, Kathy, Evaluation Specialist ............... 324-2127 Jackson, Larry, Supply Center ..................................... 324-2237 Perritt, Yoriko \"Lola\", Science Specialiat .................... 324-0518 Jackson, Roy, Cust. Supv ............................................. 570-4024 Petty, Donna, Secretary, HIPPY ................................... 324-2266 Jacobs, Joyce, Sp. Ed. Secy ........................................ 324-2180 Phillipa, Don, Trana. Dispatcher .................................. 570-4013 Jeffrey, Bonnie, Div. Exceptional Children ................. 324-2185 Price, Pat, Early Childhood Coordinator ..................... 324-0517 Johnson, Jerry, Construction Manager ....................... 570-4028 Port, Diann, Pay. Exam .............................................. 324-2184 Jones, Docia, Mathematica Specialist ......................... 324-0520 Putt, Paulette, Vocational Education ........................... 570-4044 Jonn, Linda, Schools Secy ......................................... 324-2016 Quattlebaum, Larry, Pay. Exam .................................... 3242195 I Jones, Mike, OPS Manager, Transportation ............... 570-4000 Jones, Rita, Human Resources Secy ........................... 324-2082 Rather, Becky, Parent Recruiter Coordinator ............. 324-2287 Rector, Janet, Plant Serv. Budget Assistant .............. 570-4020 I Reev, Sharon, Parts Clerk ......................................... 570-4028 Renaud, Nan M., Information Service. ........................ 324-2054 Richardson, Jacquline, HIPPY Coordinator ................ 324-2266  Ridgell, Shirley, Human Rources, Secy ................... 324-2085 Robertson, Larry S., Aaaiatant Superintendent .......... 324-2007 Robinson, Bettye, Transportation Supv ...................... 570-4002 Robinson, Robert, Teacher Recruitment Coor ........... 324-2086 Rodgera, Norma, Executive Aaaiatant ......................... 3242012 Rodgera, Sue, SOS Coodinator .................................... 324-2091 Rogera, Martha, CARE Supervisor .............................. 324-2395 Roper, Annette, HIPPY Coordinator ............................ 324-2266 Rose, Shyrel, Special Education .................................. 324-2188 Ruffins, John, Acting Dir., Information Service. ........ 324-2060 Runyan, Debra, Plant Servic, Construction Secy ... 324-4020 Rushing, Debbie, Drug Prevention .............................. 324-2166 Rushing, Jerry, Drug Prevention .................................. 324-2165 Ryndara, Diane, Coor, Gifted ........................................ 324-2187 Sandera, Lynette, Financial Services .......................... 324-2073 Saults, Chuck, KLRE/KUAR FM ................................... 569-8485 Schult, Shala, Fam. Life EdJ N-Futur .................. 324-0518 Scrimager, Brenda, Community Eduction Director .... 570-4149 Sallera, Richard, FS Supv. Mgr .................................... 324-2250 Shaw, Terri, Administration Printer ............................. 324-2031 Shead, Marian, HIPPY Supervisor ................................ 324-2266 Smith, Gary, Sp. Ed. CBI ............................................... 324-21n Smith, J-el, Custodian Annex ................................... 324-2168 Smith, Linda, Exec. Aaat. Admin .................................. 324-2011 Smith, Mary, Safety/Security Secy ............................... 324-2400 Smith, Dr. Paul, Eval. Spec ........................................... 324-2125 Smith, Vernon, Const. Mgr ........................................... 570-4026 Soo, Evelyn, Computer Spec ....................................... 324-0515 Spinelli, Gretchen, Procurement ........................................ 324-2239 Stearns, David, Trans. Mech ......................................... 570-4005 Steelman, Mary Lynn, Sp. Ed. Speech Coor ............... 324-2196 Stephens, Rose, Food Sarv. Secy ................................ 324-2250 Story, Wallace, Pay. Exam ............................................ 324-2185 Stovall, Allee, Reading Director ................................... 324-0526 Streett, Barbara, Special Education ............................. 324-2184 Sutton, Anna, Food Servic Secretary ...................... 324-2250 Sutton, James, Supply Center ...................................... 324-2237 Swain, Linda, Student Hearing Officer ........................ 324-2170 Swint, Janice, Financial Servicea ................................ 324-2070 Tanner, Gail, Adm. Secy. New Futures ........................ 324-2112 Tate, Sherrell, Procurement .......................................... 324-2241 Teach, Patty, Secretary, Desegregation ...................... 324-2109 Teeter, Judy, Reading ................................................... 324-0526 Terry, Gifford, Supply Center ....................................... 324-2237 Thomaa, Deborah, HIPPY Aide ..................................... 3242266 Thoma, Nanette, Division of Exceptional Childran ... 32421n Trowell, Judy, Math Supervisor ................................... 324-0520 Tucker, Deborah, Procurement ................................... 324-2232 Umfleet, Don, Instructional TechJUb .......................... 324-05n Und-ood, Dorothy, FS Supv ..................................... 324-2250 Viner, James, Trans. Foreman ...................................... 570-4005 Wagner, Jeanette, Director of Communications ........ 324-2020 Wagner, William, KLRE/KUAR ...................................... 569-8485 Waller, Cindy, Mobile Reaource Ctr. Coordinator_ .... 324-2164 Walla, Collen Sue, Staff Dev. Specialist ...................... 324-0500 Wallis, Carolyn, Financial Service .............................. 324-2072 Wallworth, Betty, lnat. Tech/Lib Secy ......................... 324-05n Washington, Charlotte, Schools Secy ......................... 324-2013 Washington, Daniel, IRC ............................................... 324-05n Wa18on, Christopher, Transportation Service Tech ........ 570-4005 Wa18on, Dr. Linda, Student Hearing ............................ 324-2170 Wa18on, Tommy, Mobile Resource Specialist ............ 324-2164 White, Tony, Supply Center .......................................... 324-2237 White, Rita, Exec. Administrative Aaat. ....................... 324-2087 Wiedower, Julie, Student Assignment Coordinator ... 324-2280 Williama, Ethel, Pay. Teat. Secy ................................... 324-2178 Williams, Dr. Henry P., Superintendent ....................... 324-2012 Williams, Patty, PAC Secretary .................................... 324-0$25 Williams, Ruth, Information Services .......................... 324-2052 Williams, Sharon, Student Aaaign. Data Entry ........... 324-2287 Williama, Sharon, Division of Exceptional Children ... 32421n Williams, Tommy, Supply Center ................................. 324-2237 Willis, Leonard, Supply Ctr. Manager .......................... 324-2237 Wilson, Gayle, VIPS ....................................................... 324-2293 Wisner, Beth, Psychological Examiner ....................... 324-2174 Wofford, Pat, Food Services Secretary ....................... 324-2250 Wood a, Marian, Staff Development Specialist ............ 324-0500 Woosley, Lucy, Financial Sarv ..................................... 324-2067 Young, Krishna, Special Education ............................. 324-2192 Young, Linda, New Futures Liaison ............................. 324-2113 Zawislak, Anna, VIPS ..................................................... 324-2294 Zoch, Edwin, KLRE/KUAR FM ...................................... 569-8485 LRSD Personnel Directory The Personnel Directory is produced by the Human Resources, Information Services and Communications Department of the Little Rock School District. Employees' address and/or telephone changes should be sent as soon as they oocur to the Human Resources Department. Forms are provided in the principals' offices for this purpose. Changes or additions to the first seven pages should be sent to the Communications Department. ,, i I I Other Frequently Called Numbers Alternative Learning Center .......................................... 3242370 ArkanHa Department of Education ............................. 682-4475 ArkanHa Education Aaaoclatlon ................................. 375-4611 Arkanaaa PTA ................................................. - ............. 7535247 ArkanHa Teachere' Credit Union __ ....... ............... _375.9250 Arkanaaa Teachere' Retirement ................................... 6821517 Attorneya Friday, Eldredge, Clark ............. . First Commercial Bank Bldg Audltora ......... .. 376-2011 Thomas \u0026amp; Thomas ...... .... ...................... .... .. .. ............ 3752025 Heritage West Bldg. Fax (LRSD) ..................................................................... 3242032 Fax (Procurement) ......................................................... 3242233 Little Rock Aasociatlon of Educational Office Peraonnel President, Julie Williams ............................... 4557400/562-4893 1st Vice Pres., Edna Walton .. ........... .. ....... 570-4190/562-8461 2nd Vice Pres., Gayle Gardner ........ . ....... 671-6320/227n30 Sectetary, Kay Burton ................................. 2283050227-4639 Treasurer, Deana Keathley .... ....................... 671-6380/562-4246 Little Rock Claaaroom Teachera Aasociatlon 1500 W. Fourth, Suite 305 ...... ........ .. .......................... 372-3519 President Eleanor Coleman ......................... . 3723519/6643150 Vice Pres. John Gross ..................... ........... ... 671-6267/6637962 Sec. Betty Mitchell ........ ....... .. ........ .. ..... 671-6250/851-8650 Treas. Linda J. Bell ........................................ 3242450/758..()883 Exec. Dir. Frank Martin ...... ....................................... 372-3519 Adm. Assi. Brenda Walton ....................................... 3723519 Little Rock PTA Council ................................................ 224-6746 Carta Bobo, President Little Rock School District Insurance Offlce ............... 3242083 Little Rock Teachers Credit Union ............................... 3747119 Magnet Review Committee Office ................................ 758-0156 New Futurea ................................................................... 3741011 Office of Deaegregation Monltoring ............................. 376-6200 Pfeifer Camp .................................................................. 8213714 Phyalcan, School District ............................................. 320-4362 Dr. Chris Smith Ark. Childrens Hospital Princl~I' Roundtable President, Lionel Ward ...... ....................... ..... 228-3086/2277333 Pres. Elect, Jodie T. Carter ........................... 568-0930/570-4100 Secretary, Anne Mangan ...... ........................ 324-2385/666-57TT Treasurer, Gwen Zeigler ............................... 570-4180/664-2967 Subatltute Office Service Elementary ................................................................ 3242093 Secondary ................................................................. 3242092 Treaaurer Louis J. Schaufele .......... ....................... ......... ............... 378-1000 Worthen Bank Building Schools Address Alternative Learning Ctr. 800 Appereon, 02 Badgett 6900 Pecan Road, 06 Bale 6501 W. 32nd, 04 Bfseline Booker Brady Carver Cantrel Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale Jr. Dodd Dunbar Fair Fair Park Fort Helghta Fort Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springe Gibba Hall Henderson Jefferson Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Jr. McClellan McDermott Mann Meadowcliff Metropolitan Mitchell Otter Creek Parkvlew Pulaski Heights Elem. Pulaski Heighta Jr. Rightaell Rockefeller Romine Southwest Stephens Terry Wakefield Waahington Watson Western Hilla Williama Wilson Woodruff 3623 Baaellne Rd., 09 2016 Barber, 06 7915 W. Markham, 05 2100 E. 6th, 02 1500 Park, 02 11100 Chicot, 72103 8500 Hinkaon Rd., 09 6300 Hlnkaon Rd., 09 6423 Stagecoach Rd., 04 1100 Wright Ave., 06 13420 Dodd, 10 616 No. Harrison, 05 5901 Evergreen, 05 1600 No. Tyler, 07 1701 So. Harrison, 04 300 Pleasant Valley Dr., 12 3615 W. 25th, 04 5240 Mabelvale Pike, 09 1115W.16,02 8700 \"H\" Street, OS 401 Barrow Rd., OS 2600 No. McKinley, 07 9401 Mabelvale Cut-off, 72103 10811 Mabelvale W., 72103 9417 Geyer Springe, 09 1200 Reservoir Rd., 07 1_000 E. Roosevelt Rd., 06 25 Sheraton Dr., 09 no1 Scott Hamilton, 09 2410 Battery, 06 16000 Otter Creek Pky ., 09 2501 Barrow, 04 319 No. Pine, 05 401 No. Pine, 05 911 W. 19th, 06 700 E. 17th, 06 3400 Romine Rd., 04 3301 So. Bryant, 04 3700 W. 18th, 04 10800 Mara Lynn Dr., 11 75 Weatmlniater, 09 115 W. 27th, 06 7000 Valley Dr., 09 4901 Western Hilla, 04 7301 Evergreen, 07 4015 Stannua Rd., 04 3010 W. 7th, 05 Phone Principals Secretaries Cafeteria Nurses 324-2370 Othello Falson Melinda Rodgera Georgia Greer Ed Hamlett 324-2475 Mary Golston Shirley Moore RoaeWrlght Marsha Mahan 570-4050 Levanna Wilson Lucy Hendrick Barbara Glover Ed Hamlett 570-4150 Dr. Mary Jane Cheatham Annett Jonea Pat Singley Millie McKenzie 324-2482 Dr. Cheryl Simmons Marye PowelVTlaha Joyner Uvita Scott.Johnson 228-3085 Mary Menklng Jackie Wherry Olene Curry Gwen Efird 324-2460 Mary Guinn Betty SinplOIIJ1'hylil Forbel Vivian Harris Mary Jo Curtis 324-2300 Rudolph Howard Francea Rodgers Betty Rone Kay Mobley 570-4062 Otis Prealar Louile Tucg/Connle Walker Edith Blythe Kim Hayman 570-4055 Frederick Fields Nettle Higgin Audrey Walker Jo Ann Curry 570-4085 Gayle Bradford Darlene Martinek Jo Ann Curry 455.7430 Patricia McNeil Sue Mitchell Jimmie Thoma Vicki Barney 324-2440 Nancy Acre Marilyn McGrew Bobbie Dlckeraon Lillian Wittenberg I 228-3100 Al Niven Nan Howard Rita Farner Marie Davis 671-6260 Barbara Means Winnie Camp Claire Burch Pam Jackson 671-6390 Richard Maple Becky Blanzenakl JoyceWeema Jo GIiium 671-6267 Virginia Ashley Pat Lusby Carolyn Cole 671-6380 Franklin Davis Deana Keathley Elizabeth Young Lavelle Rollins 228-3080 Mac Huffman Joyce Wyatt/Karan Reddit Sylvia Boren Lucia Perry 671-6275 Robert Brown Rachel Williama Wonda Gilley Ann Callaway 570-4160 Eleanor Cox Kimberly Roaby Mae Kyzer Kim Hayman 324-2490 Donna Davia Sherri Herndon Essie Rayford Lucia Perry 671-6200 Dr. Vic Anderson Kay Gunter Charlene Jay Janice Yeatman 228-3050 Clell Watts Merilee Low Kathleen Bisbee Carla Kelley 'j 671-6281 Francis Cawthon Barbara Ball Marilyn Masterson Barbara Bonner 455-7420 Julie Davenport Jo Greenlee/Bobbye Levy Brenda Browning Frankie Falkner ' 455-7400 Walter Marahaleck Nancy Wuneburger Carol Little Frankie Falkner 11 570-4100 Jodie Carter Elora Coleman Dorothy Robinson Theresa Bour 228-3072 Mike Oliver Rhonda Dorsett Earline Collin Pam Jackaon 324-2450 Marian Lacey Lynda Quella Laura Tanner Becky Sage 570-4185 Jerry Worm JeaaieWebb Connie Moore Vicki Barney 585-8465 Dr. Doyle Dillahunty Margaret Holt Brenda Matthews 11 324-2415 Dr. Samuel Branch Sandra Johnaon Mary Reece Margaret Bland 455.7440 Carolyn Teeter Beth Gremillion Ruby Mickle Vicki Barney 228-3000 Junious Babbs Carolyn Alexander Georgette Moore Barbara Bonner ' 671-6290 LIiiie Carter Margie Northcutt Shirley Crow Deborah Bolla 671-6250 Ralph Hoffman Eleanor Bodenhaner Shirley Crow Deborah Bolla 324-2430 Sharon Davia Minnie Vault Mentha Gilliam Nina Williams 324-2385 Anne Mangan Melody Barnes Wanda Mobley Cindy Warren 228-3086 Lionel Ward Renee Smith Reba Henaon Maraha Mahan 570-4070 Charity Smith Mary Jo Stone Janet Ivy Ed Hamlett 671-6350 Lonnie S. Dean Beverly Harri Alice Byers Elizabeth Anglin 228-3093 LaDell Looper Ann Campbell Pam Lawson Marie Davis 570-4190 Willie Morris Edna Walton Sarah Sellers Millie McKenzie I 324-2470 Karen Buchanan Phylli1 Elli Christine Franklin Betty Nieser 570-4195 Thereaaa Courtney Annie Davidson Martha Shepherd Pam Jackson 1 570-4175 Scott Morgan Peggy Weeks Irene Gulley Janice Yeatman 671-6363 Dr. Ed Jackson Gil1nldl BrowninfKriltl Tobey Arlene Chambleaa Sue Sheppard I 570-4180 Gwen Zeigler Ella Anderson Mary Lynch Margo Swanson 671-6270 Pat Higginbotham Carolyn Burt Christine Farris Millie McKenzie Personal Numbers ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENT Principal: Othello Falson 800 Apperson St Uttle Rock, AR 72202 324-2370 ALEXANDER, EVA CUSTOOIAN 624 FLETCHER n2D2 374-8107 ANDERSON, RUGENAL TEACHER 6301 CAMP ROBINSON RD #14 72118 BANKS, OTIS R TEACHER 410 DIVISION n114 3n-7637 CONNELLY, KENNETH D TEACHER RT 3 BOX 57 n104 332-8719 DOBBINS, TYRONE CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1109 G STREET n114 945-5992 FAISON, OTHELLO 0 PRINCIPAL/ALTERNATIVE SCH 1823 SWTH TAYLOR n204 666-8321 GRANDON, COLLEEN IC ca.JNSELOR 4304 LEE n205 664-2148 GREER, GEORGIA WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 5806 MANDAN ROAD n210 821-3010 HAMLETT, ROBERT EDWIN SCHOOL NURSE 32 PRINCE DR n113 851-8345 ICEa.111, ADA L TEACHER 10513 DIAMOND DRIVE n209 562-4162 MOORE JR, FRED SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4110 ~ST 25TH STREET n204 664-0637 OICERE, CAROLINE A AIDE  REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 5913 LYNDELL DRIVE n209 562-1487 PETTUS, CARLL SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 708 GREENLEA DRIVE n114 945-1525 REINHART, THOMAS T TEACHER n202 ROBERTSON, ANDREW A AIDE - REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 714 PINE STREET no32 327-4973 TARTT, PHYLLIS G TEACHER n114 THOMAS JR, NEHEMIAH TEACHER 9201 KANIS APT. 9-F n205 BADGETT ELEMENTARY Principal: Mary Golston 6900 Pecan Rd Little Rock, AR 72206 324-2475 ADAMS, ARBELLE WORKER  ELEM FOOD SERVIC 2901 LOMA DRIVE n206 490-1941 ADAMS, JANET L TEACHER  929 ~ST COLONEL GLENN RO n210 821-2173 ALBERT, REJEANA J TEACHER 10 MALCOLM COVE n209 565-6837 CAMPBELL, ETHEL J TEACHER 3806 DEBUSK CIRCLE n206 374-4433 CHILDS, SANDRA D TEACHER 7 CHARING CROSS ROAD no32 329-6156 GOLSTON, MARY R ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 8419 LABETTE n204 225-5594 GRAY, KATHRYN M AIDE - SUPERVISION n206 490-1661 GREGORY, PATRICIA A ca.JNSELOR 103 ICING PINE n120 834-1984 JONES, MARY R WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 23 BEAUREGARD n206 490-0734 MAHAN, MARSHAL SCHOOL NURSE n211 225 -6760 MCCRUEL, LESLIE L CUSTOOIAN - HEAD 3001 BATTERY n206 374-5924 MCGOWAN, DORIS J TEACHER 3505 HIGH n206 374-7101 MCLENNAN, ANNE TEACHER 2 ALBRIGHT CIRCLE n206 3n-0333 MERRILL, ANNETTE M ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 3123 ~ST 11TH n204 664-8277 MOORE, SHIRLEY J SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 10904 APPOMATTOX n1D3 455-3768 NELSON, WILBURLENE R MEDIA CLERIC 3703 BOYD STREET n204 565-8437 PEARSON, BOYCE TEACHER 2016 EAST 4TH n202 3n-3267 PHILLIPS, THELMA AIDE SUPERVISION 6406 DOVE LANE n206 490-0757 PRUITT, GAYLA R TEACHER 2106 BROADVIEW no32 450-0007 ROWE, MARY M TEACHER 17 FOREST BR()()I( CQJRT n211 221-0809 SCRUBBS JR, WALTER AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 1650 BARROW ROAD APT 38 n204 227-7315 SINGER, PATRICIA B TEACHER 320 NORTH SUMMIT n205 TRAYLOR, KATHLEEN A TEACHER 1701 GROVE HILL n116 771-7797 TRIMBLE, BETTY J TEACHER 1904 EAST CAPITOL n202 375-7899 VALUE, TERRI L TEACHER n204 WATSON, MERLYN F LIBRARIAN 25 JANWOOO DRIVE n201 228-9510 WATSON, IIJRIEL C AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 2907 MARSHALL n206 371-0831 ' WILLIAMS, LARRY L CUSTOOIAN n206 WOOO, CRYSTAL A TEACHER 215 NORTH CLAREMONT n116 833-6953 WRIGHT, ROSE M MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 1419 HANGER 72202 376-4710 IIYATT, JANICE IC TEACHER 801 S ROONEY PARHAM #9H 72205 221-0421 BALE ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Levanna Wilson 6501 West 32nd St Uttle Rock, AR 72204 -570-4050 ALLEN, LILLIAN F WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 7 WESTMONT CIRCLE 72209 562-7402 BRANCH, MARTHA A TEACHER 8908 LEATRICE DRIVE n201 225-7629 BROWN, CLARA J TEACHER 4508 WEST 1nH 71601 536-4108 CARR, SUSIE WORKER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1867 RICE 72202 3n-1514 CHILDS, FRANCES C AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 9 SHAIINEE FOREST COVE 72212 228-9379 COLLINS, PEGGY S TEACHER 1806 BRUCE 72032 CONLEY, FRANCES J TEACHER 3003 EGGMAII LANE 72032 327-3497 DOCKERY, NAE IC TEACHER 12007 TETON FOREST DRIVE n212 224-3807 EASTERLY, SHEILA A AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 5001 WEST 65TH APT 8106 72209 562-71n FLOIIERS, MARTHA L CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1406 PEYTON n204 FRENCH, MELISSA IC TEACHER 1214 MAIN STREET n113 7'96-3585 GADDY, ELLI STINE TEACHER 3205 BOYD n204 224-3938 GENTRY-HEARD, RENEE' TEACHER 5320 MARYLAIIO 72204 666-7063 GETER, RtMINDA L AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 3215 BISHOP n206 GEURIN, RAMONA M TEACHER 1708 SHI.MATE n212 223-8570 GLOVER, BARBARA J MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 3805 HOLT ST 72204 5652n4 GOOOEN, CORINE WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1601 S CEDAR n204 HAMLETT, ROBERT EDWIN SCHOOL NURSE 32 PRINCE DR n113 851-8345 HARRIS, RONALD CUSTOO IAN  PART Tl ME 2105 SCHILLER STREET n202 3n7476 HENDRICKS, LUCY M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 4314 PINE DRIVE 72015 847-2211 HILL, CAROLYN AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 2100 WEST 22ND n202 376-1216 HU\u0026gt;SON, MARY B AIDE REGULAR BlllGET #24 BAY STREET n204 224-4280 HUTTO, MARYE TEACHER 2919 ADAM STREET no32 327-9997 JACKSON JR, JOSEPH TEACHER RT 4 BOX 142 n111 JOHNSON, CARTHORIA TEACHER 11801 DESOTO FOREST n212 223-8162 JOHNSON, DELMA J TEACHER n216 MCBRIDE, BARBARA L TEACHER 9316 LABETTE DRIVE n204 225-1958 MILLER, VANESSA C AIDE  SUPERVISION 4124 WEST 15TH n204 664-4116 NELSON, JOANNE TEACHER 1223 SOUTH TAYLOR n204 663-7793 NELSON, WILBURLENE R MEDIA CLERIC 3703 BOYD STREET n204 565-8437 PLEDGER, OSHIE L TEACHER 6212 SHIRLEY DRIVE n204 666-1679 ROGERS, CHARLENE I TEACHER 4319 COBB n204 565-7848 ROUSE, IIARREN J COUNSELOR n15 APACHE n205 661-0522 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 6200 ASHER AVE APT #176 n204 SCHOFIELD, SANORA LIBRARIAN no3 ILLINOIS n201 224-6022 SHENEP, CYNTHIA IC TEACHER 824 BEACON HILL COURT n211 225-7524 SINGH, DONNA F TEACHER 116 NEVADA 71901 STILES, DONNA M TEACHER 15 NOB VIEW n205 225-1607 I TALLEY, HELEN J TEACHER 37 LAKESIDE n204 565-4146 WILSON, LEVANNA M ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 1818 S JACKSON n204 663-0119 YEAGER, JUDITH A TEACHER 1118 WILD TURKEY COURT n211 225-3804 I BASELINE ELEMENTARY Principal: Dr. Mary Jane Cheatham 3623 Baseline Rd Little Rock, AR 72209 570-4150 AKERS, SHARRA D COUNSELOR 34 MELINDA DRIVE n209 562-8857 .. BAKER, PAULA E AIDE FOOR YR Ol.D PROGRA 1304 MARLYN DRIVE n205 BROOKS, LETITIA R TEACHER 116 S(lJTH 24TH 71923 246-7057 BURCHETT, CARLETTA D TEACHER 9121 LEW DRIVE APT C n209 BURCHFIELD, VICKI TEACHER 21443 CRABAPPLE CIRCLE n065 888-1077 CALDIIELL, JOSEPHINE B AIDE SUPERVISION 2701 S(lJTH CROSS 72206 375-8055 CANNON, SHIRLEY L AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 3801 BASELINE APT 24 n209 CARTER, CHARLES R TEACHER 1323 S(lJTH TYLER n204 CASEY, DOROTHY A AIDE SUPERVISION 5205 EAST 145TH STREET n206 897-1190 CHEATHAM, MARY J ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11401 S(lJTHRIDGE n212 225-4938 CONLEY, TINA A AIDE  FOOR YR OLD PROGRA 9914 DOBBY n206 DEATON, BETTY IC TEACHER 1049 CLINTON 71923 246-8537 FOSTER, BARRON J CUSTOOIAN 3513 WHITFIELD n204 228-0818 ' FOWLER, MILLICENT IC TEACHER 1811 S(lJTH GRANT n204 661-1082 GAYLOR, ELSIE WORKER ELEM FClal SERVIC 311 CHARBETT DRIVE n204 565-1269 GLASON, DIANNE M TEACHER 3313 IIEST 10TH n204 663-4584 HARDESTY, PATTY J TEACHER 7435 ANDERSON noo2 847-3406 HARRIS, BEVERLY CUSTOOIAN 2112 S(lJTH MARTIN n204 666-6312 HARRIS, LORETTA M TEACHER 1500 S. TYLER n204 664-3045 ' HUFFMAN, CAROLYN A TEACHER 111 BROWNING DRIVE 71913 767-3001 HUSSEY, PAULINE IC AIDE SUPERVISION 8711 MIZE ROAD n209 562-8183 JACKSON, CONNIE M AIDE SUPERVISION 4010 ARAPAHO TRIAL n209 568-2281 JAMES, MARILYN IC TEACHER 4500 UNION AVE #43 71603 879-5798 JAMES, TERRIE J MEDIA CLERIC 116 EAST NGII n116 7588671 JONES, ANNETTE L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 4304 MARYLAND AVENUE n204 LAMB, ANITA J TEACHER 13111 IIEST MARKHAM APT 37 n211 2239810 MARSHALECIC, DONNA M TEACHER 2620 RIVERFRONT APT 256 n202 660-4458 MAYFIELD, CARLOS D AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 2100 RICE STREET n202 376-8016 MCDONALD, MARY J TEACHER 504 NEBLING ROAD n205 227-6046 MILLER, MICHAEL A WORKER - ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC #4 TRENT DRIVE n209 562-3590 MITCHELL, MARIA A TEACHER 2804 IIEST 6TH n205 664-4668 NALLEY, MARGARET R LIBRARIAN 13017 CRABAPPLE PLACE n209 455-2081 NORMAN, ANN C TEACHER 7101 GUINEVERE DRIVE n209 562-3435 POTEET, LISA B TEACHER 3322 CARMINE COVE no22 847-1465 I RENDEL, RAYL CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 609 PARKDALE n111 945-2897 RUNYAN, JUDITH A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5511 BASELINE #9 n209 565-6332 SELF, ELAINE M TEACHER #29 MARKHAM PLACE n211 224-n19 SINGLEY, PATRICIA L MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 1311 IIEST WOODSON LATERAL n065 888-8644 SMITH, DELWIN H TEACHER 3no HIGH DRIVE n206 3n-2ao3 SMITH, EUNICE ,D TEACHER #14 HAWTHORNE DRIVE no32 327-6316 I SMITH, WILLIAM 0 TEACHER 9503 NORTH VIEW DRIVE n120 834-5738 IIEDGE, KIMBERLY D WORKER ELEM FClal SERVIC 15907 SHIRLEY DRIVE noo2 847-9655 WHITTAKER, NONA M TEACHER P.O. BOX 250021 n225 664-6694 YOUNG, STACEY L TEACHER 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD #119 n201 223-8901 BOOKER MAGNET Principal: Dr. Cheryl Simmons 2016 Barber St Uttle Rock, AR 72206 324-2482 ABBOTT, JO ANN TEACHER 5901 JFIC BLVD #4224 n116 ' ALLEY, MARYL TEACHER 7575 CANTRELL APT 38 n201 663-4420 ARMSTRONG, MARTHA A TEACHER 5009 ROOSEVELT noo2 847-30n AUSTIN, CLARA D TEACHER 13820 WINDSOR ROAD n212 225-5439 BAKER, MICHELE LYNN TEACHER 1221 RESERVOIR APT 146 n201 221-0789 BIRD, NOBUKO E WORKER ELEM FClal SERVIC 111 HAMPTON COVE no76 982-7105 BISHOP, NANCY COUNSELOR 82 ROBINWOOD n201 BLEDSOE, RITA L TEACHER 9907 SUFFOLK DRIVE n204 227-9907 BONDS, WILMA B TEACHER 13425 1-30 no15 7780911 BROW, NARTIIA C TEACHER 23815 HWY 10 72212 868-9617 IIURNS, PATRICIA M LIBRARIAN 7419 OHIO #3-A 72207 666-8266 IURRUSS, MERILYN P TEACHER 12 TALLYHO n207 228-5783 CHARLESTON, SANTONIA AIDE SUPERVISION ROOTE 2 BOX 543 n206 490-1836 CLARK, DENISE W TEACHER 8416 EASY STREET 72116 834-8941 COLFORD, SUSAN TEACHER 600 NORTH MARTIN mos 663-no2 CURRY, VIRGINIA E AIDE SUPERVISION 212 HILDA 72076 982-2774 DAVIS, VELLA D MEDIA CLERIC 1923 EAST 38TH 72206 374-4775 DICKERSON, KAYE H TEACHER 11 BIRCHWOOD DRIVE no32 329-8612 DOOLEY, VIVIAN IC CQJNSELOR 5918 LIBERTY COVE 72209 568-1251 DORER, ROBERT A TEACHER 33405 HWY 300 72135 330-2850 DUNAVIN, IVA L WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC n206 ELLINGTON, LORETTA TEACHER 12120 PLEASANT FOREST DRI n212 EZELL, DONNA J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1621 WEST SHORT 1nH 72114 376-7114 FARLEY, JENNIFER D TEACHER 22 JOHNNY LANE 72116 834-8675 GIPSON, DEBRA ELISE TEACHER 325 B SOUTH MITCHELL 72032 329-4943 HAMPTON, PAULA R TEACHER 5300 BASELINE ROAD APT 12 72209 888-7318 HARDING, CASSANDRA D TEACHER 7805 WOOD 11A VEN 72209 IIARRELL, ALICE L AIDE SUPERVISION 1906 DOVER LANE 72206 375-6052 KAYES, cIAH CUSTOOIAN 3116 CENTER STREET 72206 375-2718 HESTIR, JOANN TEACHER 1817 WEWOKA DRIVE 72116 834-2365 HIGDON, TAMMY TEACHER 7700 NORTH HILLS BLVD '80 72116 834-0192 HUIE, CAROLYN IC TEACHER 200 MILLWCXXl CIRCLE #413 72206 851-0486 JEFFRIES, VEARLON L TEACHER 1218 WEST 28TH 72206 JOHNSON, NAYREAN S TEACHER 11893 RIVERCREST DRIVE 72212 JONES, ALICIA R TEACHER 43 WARREN DRIVE APT #98 72209 JOYNER, TISA S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 420 MESA DRIVE APT IC54 72211 KARP, ROSE MAR IE TEACHER 914 SCHRINER COURT 72116 753-3325 KELLEY, CLEMENTINE TEACHER 6601 STERLING DRIVE 72204 663-2584 KELLEY, LOIS W TEACHER 15 INVERNESS CIRCLE 72212 227-5148 KELLY, EVELYN TEACHER 1604 SCOTT APT B 72206 372-5338 KINDER, JAMES B TEACHER 8617 NANCY PLACE 72204 562-0879 LACEY JR, JESSE J ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 6412 SHIRLEY DR 72204 664-7912 LEHNHOFF, DENNA N TEACHER 5905 LOWRANCE 72118 758-4167 LOFTON, NARY R TEACHER 10 HAMPSHIRE CIRCLE 72212 225-0966 NARSIIALL, JAMES A CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1404 S WASHINGTON 72204 664-2158 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN IC TEACHER 500 CAMBRIDGE PLACE 72207 836-2785 MCMORRAN, NARY E TEACHER 101 LANCASTER 72209 562-2377 MEYERDIRIC, CAROL A TEACHER 1201 SOUTHEDGE 72207 225-9121 MIDDLETON, PATSY A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 13120 QUAIL CREEK #8 72206 888-4587 NEWCOMB, DARYL D TEACHER 2124 N. ARTHUR 72207 664-9246 OICECHUICW, MARIAN WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 116 SOUTH LOCUST 72114 945-7895 OLIVER, ORA D AIDE SUPERVISION 64 N MEADOIICLIFF 72209 565-0956 PLEASANT, CARWIN J TEACHER 2714 STATE 72206 374-1309 POWELL, MARYE M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL #3 KARON CT 72205 225-1086 RAGLAND, STEPHANIE J CUSTOOIAN 2019 E 4TH 72202 374-5812 SARLO, T IICJ4AS C TEACHER 2024 LLOYD COORT 72205 376-4316 SCOTT-JOHNSON, UVITA L SCHOOL NURSE 912 BEDFORD 72202 375-3796 SIMMONS, CHERYL A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 3300 NORTH CYPRESS 72116 771-1035 SMITH, NARY A TEACHER 3609 TUDOR DRIVE 72204 224-0603 TAYLOR, CAROLYN W TEACHER 7905 DEERWOOD DRIVE 72204 224-8707 TROTTER, DANIELL CUSTOOIAN 5000 WEST 29TH 72204 WALKER, BERTHENA C TEACHER 1317 SCHILLER 72202 664-2234 WALLS, BOBBIE J TEACHER 2617 LOOISIANA STREET 72206 375-8547 WEIR, NANCY L TEACHER 909 SCHRINER COORT 72116 758-4072 WHITE, DISHOONGH TEACHER 2201 CENTER 72206 374-4919 WHITE, GLORIA A TEACHER 12815 HWY 365 72206 897-5229 WOODS, BRENDAL AIDE SUPERVISION 1022 APPERSON 72202 375-9205 WORTHY, PAMELA L WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 10520 TOPAZ CIRCLE 72209 565-7659 YOUNG, MICHELLE L TEACHER 12315 CHERRY LAUREL DRIVE 72211 221-2302 BRADY ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Mary Menklng 7915 West Markham St Uttle Rock, AR 72205 228-3065 BRADLEY, ROZALYN M TEACHER 10613 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE n212 227-5536 BROWN, LAlolRENCE CUSTOOIAN 813 HARRINGTON n202 376-0039 CHARLES, KATHLEEN M TEACHER 504 MCADOO n205 663-7388 CROMEDY, GERALDINE TEACHER 1105 SClJTH CLEVELAND n204 664-5180 CROSBY, SUSAN M TEACHER 115 INDIAN TRAIL n201 228-0170 CURRY, OLENE E MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOO 7904 WESTWOOO n204 565-4475 DOOGLAS, PAMELA J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC n135 DUGAN, FRANCES R TEACHER 3021 CHARTER OAK n201 227-0327 ELAM, MARSHAL TEACHER 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #101 n201 228-5443 EVANS, ANITA F WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 1420 BISHOP n202 375-5007 FOSTER, DONALD CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 3112 BOYD n209 GAMBLE, SUSANNE COOIISELOR #2 NOTTINGHAM RD. #1 n205 664-2371 GORDON, JANICE L TEACHER 10 SlNIERHILL CT n211 227-8857 HANNAHS, BARBARA I TEACHER 12704 ST CHARLES BLVD n211 223-9505 HARDY, KATHRYN C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n214 HARKEY, JANE A TEACHER 2027 NORTH ARTHUR n201 663-2892 HIMSTEDT, KIMBERLY H TEACHER 42 GREENVIEW CIRCLE n116 834-0066 HOOGES, BARBARA L TEACHER 4709 EASTWOOO n204 565-0816 JONES JR, EARNEST L AIDE SUPERVISION n209 562-8389 KOON, BETTY R TEACHER 4319 COBB n204 562-4652 LESTER, SANDRA L TEACHER 31 OAK FOREST DR I VE n113 851-3695 MCCLURKAN, EDWINA Y TEACHER 19306 QUAIL RUN n209 455-1421 MCGEE, SUZANNE B TEACHER 112 CAMBRIDGE PLACE n201 225-9590 MCINTYRE, GORDON L TEACHER ROOTE 1 BOX 89H no16 982-2330 MENKING, MARY A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5 HERITAGE COURT n211 225-3822 MOORE, PATSY A AIDE SUPERVISION 4100 ELAM n204 562-1408 NICHOLS, VALARIE R AIDE SUPERVISION 1422 EAST 38TH n206 3n-5111 NUNLEY, GLORIA A LIBRARIAN 601 CENTER no32 329-7199 O'NEAL, EARNEST L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4920 AUGUSTA CIRCLE APT G n118 OLIVER, SHELLY R TEACHER 14 POlol)ERHORN COURT n212 225-9332 ROSE, SHERRYL TEACHER 11119 COCONO VALLEY n212 225-1119 SHELLS, GENEVA S TEACHER 6613 STERLING DRIVE n204 664-7763 SITLINGTON, CAROL W MEDIA CLERIC 2no CROOCHWOOO ROAD n201 663-6658 I SUMNER, FRANKIE B TEACHER #6 EVERGREEN CIRCLE n201 666-8537 TAYLOR, WONE D AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n204 TEETER, KATHRYN A TEACHER 1700 TARRYTOWN ROAD n201 225-7852 TOLBERT, IRMA J TEACHER 4820 TIMBERLAND DRIVE n204 663-9353 VARDAMAN, TAMI L TEACHER 14312 RIDGEWOOO n211 WAMBLE, FAUSTINE TEACHER 608 SHACKLEFORD n211 WASHINGTON, MARY A TEACHER 2011 BATTERY n202 WELLS, MISTYE ELIZABETH TEACHER 8120 W MARKHAM #12 n205 221-9868 WHERRY, JACQUELINE L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL n209 WHITE, LATONIA M WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 10209 INDEPENDENCE n209 568-6741 WIGHT, LINDA M AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 11000 STAGECOACH ROAD APT n205 WILLIAMS, ERNESTINE WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC n206 WILLIAMS, SARAH M AIDE SUPERVISION 813 HARRINGTON n202 376-4365 WILLIAMS, WILLIE F CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 9305 MALABRI DRIVE n209 568-5216 WOFFORD, HELEN L AIDE FOOR YR OLD PROGRA 710 WEST M APT 105 n116 YOONG, EVA M TEACHER 3708 HOLT n204 562-n2s CARVER MAGNET 2100 East Sixth St Llttle Rock, AR 72202 324-2460 NIEL, Llll\u0026gt;A G ANDREWS, SHARON F IIAICER, PATRICIA A BARKSDALE, NARY D 8ELOTTI, VIRGINIA M 8ENNETT, AC IOYD, DARRELL L BURNEY, NARY C BYRD, DEBORAH H CALDWELL, CHARLOTTE CAMPBELL, WENG Cllll!, JANE S CURTIS, JULIE B CURTIS, NARY J DOYNE, ANGELA K EFIRD, WENDY L FLEMING, LINDA K FORBES, PHYLLIS P GIBSON, SUSAN Y GLENN, BETTY GLENN, LINDA F GRIMMITT, BONNIE S GUINN, NARY E HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J HARRIS, VIVIAN A HARRISON, KATHLEEN A HARSHAW, HERRIN F HASAN, ABDULLAH H HENRY, JULIE D HOOKER, MELBA J HURD, LISA K JOHNSON, IRENE B JOSEPH, JUNE D KELLEY, BRYANA D KEOWN, MARY J LANGLEYS, DIANNE W LEE, AIJ\u0026gt;REY M MACK, ROBERT MANNING, DEBRA A MANNON, ROBERTA A NARCRIM, HAZEL J MAULDIN, MINNIE W MAYWEATHER, ELNORA MORRIS, NELDA J MUNNS, PATRICIA A OGLE, LIBBY J PACE, TEATA D PENN, PRISCILLA J POWER, LEETA D ROBERTS, M MARTHA ROLAND, Ml L TON ROWLAND, VIRGINIA S SANDERS, PATRICIA A SIMPSON, BETTY R COONSELOR TEACHER AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA LIBRARIAN TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER AIDE  REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET TEACHER SECRETARY PRINCIPAL AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOD TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION CUSTOOIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE CUSTOOIAN  HEAD TEACHER TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC AIDE SUPERVISION MEDIA CLERK TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTOOIAN TEACHER AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET SECRETARY PRINCIPAL Prlnclpal: Mary Guinn 2105 DORCHESTER 9115 LEATRICE DRIVE 717 EAST 15TH STREET 8 BRADLEY LANE 5612 WALNUT ROAD 11119 COCONO VALLEY 5519 VALLEY DRIVE 6 MOCICINGBIRD LANE 6025 BATTLE TRL 3616 ARAPAHO #11 POST OAK LOOP 1012 CHEPSTOW LANE 5120 GARRISON ROAD 921 GILLETTE P.O. BOX 166 4101 NAN APT 3 10 LAMONT DR 1010 EAST 11TH 1405 EAST 11TH APT 403 6200 NJN STREET 4500 COLVERT ROAD 8515 KENNESAW 13 LAKESIDE DRIVE 5301 tnJNTRY CLUB RT 1 BOX 299 1210 GEYER APT 901 an, HIGGINS SWITCH ROAD 1713 PARK STREET #44 HWY 285 E. 9705 HIGHWAY 365 1702 ARROWHEAD RD APT D 12415 TIMBER BEND DRIVE RTE 2 BOX 652 3700 CANTRELL #703 7423 GRACE DRIVE 910 KIRSPEL 7300 KINGWOOO ROAD 305 SPRINGWOOO DRIVE 5601 HARKINS AVENUE 4601 WEST 24TH 1117 BOUNDLESS #26 OLD ORCHARD DRIVE 1109 BISCAYNE DRIVE 25027 HIGHWAY 365 NO. 7 OAK FOREST COVE 17 EAST WE DRIVE 2922 LEE AVENUE 1122 E WASHINGTON 3 OAJCHURST DRIVE 604 NMN STREET APT 201 11615 ASHWOOO 72204 72207 n11, n207 n116 72212 72209 n207 72211 n209 n120 n116 n211 n205 no53 n205 n209 n11, n202 n201 n211 n103 n204 n201 n1,2 n211 n202 n206 n104 n116 no5a n206 n11s n211 n206 n202 n209 n202 n201 n211 n210 n204 n202 n103 n201 n103 n113 n113 n116 n205 n11, n202 n116 n211 2259438 2250522 3787826 2253068 7582576 2251119 5656858 6637050 8685881 5652702 8356367 8358076 8213786 2256365 4901255 6667358 3710213 3744252 6669333 8212137 4553317 5620382 6645843 3768065 4901198 7533610 6796290 8974942 7539889 2289589 4900849 6646613 3745438 6638865 8214961 3752849 455 1211 221-3522 8510434 851-2913 m-0691 663-1688 3747915 661-4639 758-7613 - SKUBAL, EUNICE L TEACHER 510 BRYANT MEADOWS DRIVE 72022 847-1462 SMITH, RHONDA F TEACHER 1009 VESTAL 72204 374-1614 SPANN, MEREDITH J TEACHER 8300 L\u0026lt;lAIANDA DRIVE 72205 227-5394 SWEAT, JESCENA TEACHER 3410 DORSET DRIVE 72204 221-2526 TATIJ4, KATHY R caJNSELOR 11411 HWY 365 72206 897-5142 THCMAS, VANNETTA J  TEACHER 7107 YORKI.IOOO DRIVE 72209 T H04PSON , CAROL E LIBRARIAN 21 PLANTATION 72206 490-0347 UNDERWOOD-MORAVEC, LEIGH TEACHER 15 PATRICIA LANE 72058 679-5680 VALUE, TERRIL TEACHER 72204 WALKER, SHIRLEY D TEACHER 13101 A QUAIL CREEK 72206 888-3609 WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V TEACHER 1704 GLENDA DRIVE 72205 227-9031 WATTS, RONDA M TEACHER 4710 SAM PECK ROAD APT 11 72212 225-6474 WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K TEACHER 127 VERNON AVENUE 72205 376-2530 WILSON, CYNTHIA L TEACHER 1600 JOHN HARDEN DR 72076 985-2196 WINFREY, VEARLEAN AIDE SUPERVISION 1404 EAST 11 APT 113 72202 375-1753 WOODS Ill, ROBERT L CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 1207 WEST SCENIC APT T-13 72118 753-9285 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Principal: Rudolph Howard 1500 Park St Little Rock, AR 72202 324-2300 ADAIR, GLADYS M SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 2914 MARSHALL 72206 ALLISON, ROBIN R TEACHER 6310 ASHER AVENUE APT 606 72204 565-7370 ALLMON, TERRY L TEACHER P.O. BOX 244 72183 897-5904 ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A LIBRARIAN 115 FAIRVIEW ROAD 72205 663-2070 ARICK, JOYCE A TEACHER 5206 11F11 STREET 72205 664-2651 BECKER, MARY C TEACHER 7523 \"F\" STREET 72205 666-0644 BENNETT, TIMOTHY P TEACHER 519 EAST 6TH STREET 72202 BLACKMAN, TONY TEACHER 4802 SCHOOL 72117 945-7654 BLAIR, SAM K caJNSELOR 6421 WEST 3RD STREET #2 72205 664-1m BLESSING, DONALD K TEACHER 6609 NAVAJO 72116 835-2013 BOONE, EDDIE L TEACHER 2806 LENNOX DRIVE 72204 225-3861 IICM4AN, RUTHIE M CUSTOOIAN 4108 WEST 23RD 72204 6665374 BOYETT, EDWARD B TEACHER 3 TALMAGE COURT 72204 565-2162 BRACK, ROBERT L TEACHER 9425 DARTMOUTH DRIVE 72204 225-4282 BRIGGS, BOBBY C CUSTOOIAN 2822 WEST 14TH STREET 72204 376-1424 l BRIGGS, DEMETRIA G SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 72206 BROWN, JAMES TEACHER 4714 WEST 29TH STREET 72204 664-9314 BROWN, JAMES A TEACHER 1201 WELCH 72202 372-7458 BYRNE, ROISIN TEACHER 1111 N JACKSON 72205 034-6469 CALDWELL, CHERYL D TEACHER 72211 CALDWELL, SUZANNE 0 TEACHER 605 SKYLINE DRIVE 72116 758-8931 CALLAWAY, ELIZABETH W CQJNSELOR 6 LESLIE CIRCLE 72205 225-4336 CALLAWAY, NORMAN M TEACHER 1412 N MELLON 72207 666-7095 CARPENTER, MARGARET A TEACHER 916 JEFFERSON 72204 664-6089 CARUTH, PHYLLIS V TEACHER P O BOX 2372 72203 CASH, EVALOU H WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 3120 PEYTON 72204 666-7368 CHAMBLISS, PATRICIA A TEACHER 411 DEL RIO 72205 663-8482 CLAY, SHERRIL TEACHER 39 OPHELIA 72113 851-3271 CLOUD JR, WILLIAM L BUILDING ENGINEER 21 LYRIC LANE 72205 227-8111 CLOUD, GAYLE H TEACHER 21 LYRIC LANE 72205 227-8111 COBB, JEAN T TEACHER 1022 NORTH CLEVELAND 72207 666-9042 COLBURN, MELISSA A TEACHER 2112 LLOYD COURT 72205 374-5033 COLE, JENNIE B TEACHER 332 NORTH RIDGE ROAD 72207 666-6250 COON, SUE L TEACHER 3353 HWY 5 SOUTH 72045 7968490 CORTINEZ, KATHERINE TEACHER 9 CHAPARRAL LANE 72212 225-5448 COX, BERNIE L TEACHER 3121 HAZY RIDGE COURT 72207 227-0323 CREWS, MARY M TEACHER #9 ROCKLEDGE PLACE 72113 2279175 DANIEL, BRANTON P TEACHER 1406 S CEDAR 72204 6665213 DAVIS, ROBIN L TEACHER 72076 DEITZ, SANDY G TEACHER 6519 EVERGREEN ROAD 72207 663-90n DENNIS, Al.ORA T TEACHER 1905 S VAN BUREii 72204 6648051 DILLARD, KRISTI L TEACHER 2010 RIVERVIEW DRIVE  72205 3727322 DOBBINS JR, ALBERT L CUSTOOIAN 1705 WEST 23RD 72206 3764345 DONHAM, MELISSA C TEACHER 6119 JAMES ROAD n118 851 4755 DUMAS, ELAINE IC LIBRARIAN 484 RIDGEWAY 72205 6637180 DUNHOO, ICERVIS R CUSTOOIAN 3502 LWWIG 72204 2277565 DYER, JACQUELIN W TEACHER 4816 CRESTWOCO 72207 6667934 EASTER, MARION 0 TEACHER 2450 SOUTH PARK STREET 72206 3721690 EVANS, KATHRYN S TEACHER 2602 WEST 26TH 71603 5360845 FAGAN, ROSIE L CUSTOOIAN  ASST HEAD 72202 FELLS, JACKIE SCHOOi. BASED SEOJRITY OFF 1514 WEST 20TH 72202 3763739 FIELDS, WILLIE J AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC 2011 AZTEZ DR. APT. 192 72116 8341967 FITZPATRICK JR, OLIVER TEACHER 5704 CHAUCER LANE 72209 568-5387 FUTRELL, BRENDA J TEACHER 32 REGENCY CIRCLE 72209 568-3596 GADBERRY, SARAH E TEACHER #3 POINT SOUTH COURT 72211 2242801 GADDY, HELEN B TEACHER 93D1 RUTGERS DRIVE 72204 2242696 GATES, KATHY TEACHER 415 GOSHEN 72116 7588878 GIVENS, WILLIE T CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 1409 SOUTH TYLER 72204 6641704 GRAHAN, HARRYETTE TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PICWAY #170B 72211 225-1n1 GRAVES, JESSICA A COUNSELOR 31 ST TH\"4AS COURT 72211 2251508 GRAW, PHYLLIS R TEACHER 2009 LLOYD COURT 722D5 3723351 GRAY, JOE A TEACHER 2606 CROSS 72206 376-7348 HAMMONS, WEIi A TEACHER 1421 SOUTH CLEVELAND 72204 HARDIN, GWENDOLYN E TEACHER 8600 EVERGREEN DRIVE 72207 2248779 HARGIS, ALISON C TEACHER 4300 WOCOLAWN 72205 6663921 HEGGS, URSELLA W ' SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 9116 VICTORIA DRIVE 72209 HENDERSON, SHERRY L\u0026lt;lJ TEACHER 5116 CANTRELL ROAD 72207 6635465 HESSELSCHWERDT, RONALD F TEACHER 9809 SNIDER COURT 7220$ 2256493 HILL, MARSHA IC WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 4907 VAUGHN RD 72118 m-0118 HILL, SHEICETA G TEACHER 1020 MIMOSA 71603 536-4026 HOFFNANMCDERNOTT, MICHEL TEACHER 5 WOCOCLIFF CIRCLE 72204 5657615 HOGAN, SUSAN P TEACHER 107 CRYSTAL COURT 72205 6640815 HOLLADAY, KATHLEEN T TEACHER 108 SOUTH MAIN 72015 n6-1872 HOOPER, BEVERLY R TEACHER 2009 SINGLETON COURT 72204 2242563 HOWARD, RWOLPH SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 8106 LOUWANDA 72205 2239711 HUFFORD, GARY W TEACHER 516 NORTH PINE STREET 72205 663-1n1 IVEY, DELORES S COUNSELOR 3011 IMPERIAL DR 72212 225-0714 JAMES, BRENDA F ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 1868 ARCH STREET 72206 3710800 JARMON, MYRA M TEACHER 1705 MISSOUR 71601 5341174 JOHNSON, BENNY D SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 1805 WEST 18TH 72202 376-3901 JOHNSON, GRACE E CUSTOOIAN #5 QUAIL CREEK COURT 72206 897-4575 JOHNSON, JOHNNIE M WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 1509 SUMMIT 72202 3726666 JOHNSON, LYNDA P COUNSELOR 12 DARTN\u0026lt;lJTH 72204 2287203 JONES, BERNESTINE WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 2020 STATE 72206 376-9652 JORDAN, MILDRED WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 1015 WEST 20TH 72206 3751710 KEARNEY, LESLIE A TEACHER 60 STONELEDGE DRIVE 72113 851-4851 LANCE, CHARLES H TEACHER 4 BUFFINGTON COURT 72209 565-1918 LLOYD, OTTIMIS C AIDE SUPERVISION 3019 WEST 1nH 72204 6665061 LOYA, SNIJEL T TEACHER P.O. BOX 2033 72115 8351496 MALONE, WEST I NA WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 8715 TEDBURN DRIVE 72209 568-6649 MARSH, EDWARD W TEACHER 75 LEFEVER LANE 72207 2241240 NAYS, GRACIE C TEACHER 418 EAST 38TH 71601 5365593 MCDONALD, DOROTHY L TEACHER 1002 BELMONT DR 71601 535-1037 MCDONALD, THCMAS A TEACHER 314 NORTH ASH 72205 663-7063 MCFADDEN, ELIZABETH IC TEACHER 11201 HICKORY HILL ROAD 72211 221  7110 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN IC TEACHER 500 CAMBRIDGE PLACE 72207 836-2785 I n I MCKISICK, DERRICK CUSTOOIAN 72204 MCLENDON, JOANNE B TEACHER 3101 S BRYANT n204 562-5425 MCLENNAN, FREDIE D TEACHER 1801 S IZARD STREET n206 375-8888 MCMURRAY, VICTOR C TEACHER 2420 RIVERFRONT DRIVE APT n202 666-3771 MEADOWS, MARKE TEACHER 12514 COLLEEN DRIVE n212 221-3001 MOGSTAD, BONNIE L TEACHER #5 TIMBER PARK COORT n211 225-0241 MOLDEN, FLORA D TEACHER 5000 N llOOLANO DRIVE n,17 945-3470 MONCRIEF, GWEN V TEACHER 9820 DOBBY DRIVE n206 888-9509 MOORE, KENT L TEACHER 1309 CATALPA DRIVE 71603 535-1678 MOSELEY, KATHLEEN K SCHOOL NURSE 12524 PLEASANT VIEW n212 221-1580 NASH, DORIS L TEACHER 5813 BASELINE APT #234 n209 562-4570 NASH, LANGEL TEACHER 14425 FRONTIER DRIVE #92 n113 O'NEAL, JANE REGISTRAR 403 HARPER LANE n118 758-1940 PAXTON, VERONICA J TEACHER 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD APT 2 n201 225-0360 PEDIGO, MARY J TEACHER 18 MCGOVERN DRIVE n205 225-5122 :1 PETERS, DIANE E TEACHER 16920 BURLINGAME ROAD n211 821-6229 PETERSON, MICHAEL W ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 8801 NANCY PLACE n204 562-4970 PETWAY, MARY A TEACHER 6619 LONGWOOO n201 280-2914 PIERCE, MAUREEN TEACHER 2 CENTENARY DRIVE n204 568-4931 POST, JULIA A TEACHER 9802 HWY 165 n,11 945-7678 PREWIT, MARY J TEACHER 3004 IMPERIAL VALLEY DRIV n212 225-6412 RAMSEY, KATHLEEN E TEACHER 815 SHEA DRIVE n205 227-8742 ROBERTS, JOHN A BUILDING ENGINEER 1613 STATE NORTH APARTMEN n206 374-1980 ROBERTSON JR, THOMAS A AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC 5533 RIDGEWAY DRIVE no15 794-2812 ROBINSON, CONSTANCE F TEACHER 6511 ELMORE ROAD n209 565-2198 ROOGERS, FRANCESE SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 9300 TREASURE HILL ROAD # n201 221-3112 RONE, BETTY S MANAGER SR HIGH FOOO SE 21458 130 UNIT #35 no15 847-8738 ROSENBERGER, BETTY C MEDIA CLERK 21814 HENLEY LANE n065 888-7316 ROUSSEAU, NANCY L ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 11 RIVER OAKS n201 666-1738 I RUTLEDGE, MARILYN F TEACHER n212 SAIN, LLOYD TEACHER 630 CHRISTIAN 72335 SCHLESINGER, DEBRA S TEACHER 2200 ANDOVER COORT APT 70 n201 SHOFNER, KIRBY E TEACHER 210 NORTH ASH n205 666-7736 I SIEGEL, LARRY B TEACHER 42 SlMIIT RIDGE n211 224-3187 SIEGEL, TERESA T BOOKKEEPER 42 SlMIIT RIDGE n211 224-3187 SIMS, JERQ4E E SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 3709 WEST STREET n204 565-3802 SIZEMORE, EVELYN D PBX OPERATOR 5306 WESTMINISTER n209 SMITH, DAVID M TEACHER 4 TIMBER VALLEY COVE n204 562-5820 SNITH, FLOYD SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 1601 WEST 19TH n202 374-8944 SNITH, JERRY SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 1601 WEST 19TH n202 374-0006 SNITH, TERESA J WORKER SR HIGH FOOO SER 6823 1/2 WEST 65TH n209 568-5038 SNOOGRASS, AMYL TEACHER 13741 CHILDRESS ROAD no,, 557-5061 STELL, LINDA M SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 2218 WASHINGTON AVENUE no32 329-8289 TAYLOR, ROBERT M TEACHER 8 PORTSMOUTH DRIVE n209 565-n93 TAYLOR, TRAVIS F TEACHER 42 ECHO LANE no32 327-3142 THOMPSON, LOIS B TEACHER 1201 NORTH PIERCE #3 n201 666-6366 THOMPSON, NANCY K TEACHER 215 VERNON n205 371-9766 THRASHER, BEVERLY B TEACHER n206 TIMMONS, CALVIN CUSTODIAN 9020 VICTORIA DRIVE n209 562-6800 Tl NKLE, BETTY SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 17512 CORINTHIAN DR n210 225-7865 VENABLE, GLORIA 0 TEACHER 108 SOUTH MARTIN n205 664-7020 WATSON, BILLY N TEACHER 416 WEST 25TH n114 753-8640 WATSON, PATRICIA A COONSELOR 12319 JACKSONVILLE-CATO R n120 834-8122 WATTS, DARRELL J ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 12231 MARYLAND PLACE n120 834-n25 WEBB JR, CECIL H TEACHER 53 OUACHITA DRIVE n113 851-8849 WHITE, DIANE B TEACHER n204 WILDER, BARBARA A TEACHER 6208 SENATE DRIVE n209 I WILLIAMS, BETTYE F TEACHER P.O. BOX 165042 n216 WILLIAMS, CAROLYN J SECRETARY GUIDANCE #3 CARLA DRIVE n209 565-1205 WILLIAMS, KELLY D SECRETARY PRINCIPAL P.O. BOX 381 n164 WILLIAMS, WANDA L WILLIS, EULA M WILSON, CLAll\u0026gt;INE WILSON, IIAIICY L WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER TEACHER 1622 SOUTH PARK STREET 2802 LINDA KAY DRIVE P O BOX 112 2004 LLOYD COURT 72201 n206 72183 72205 374\"'3 8882274 897-4561 3722934 .\n,o1S~l CHICOT ELEMENTARY fli jj'd-#/tJ 11100ChlcotRd\nNkl. C.7/- C.~tC Mabelvale, AR 72103 Principal: Otis Preslar \\ 7a' ., ~ (G~~.e.. ttJ,,._11t,,t_,,J 570-4062 ARIKAWE, MARGIE L BAILEY, JACK H BALNAZ, BETTYE M BEOOW, I.AURA M BLYTHE, EDITH BOYD, KATHLEEN BRCMI, KATHLEEN M BRYANT, GEORGIE H CLEVELAIIO, ELLEAN 0 CRAVEN, ERNESTINE C CUNNINGS, GEORGIA L DALE, SUSAN M DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN H EANS, SYLVERENE G GERSHNER, VICKI M HALEY, LETHA J HARRIS, BRENDA G HAYMAN, KIMBERLY B HICKS, BARBARA A HICKS, KATHLEEN F HOLLINGSWORTH, JUDY A HOOD, KAYE ISBELL, PAMELON J JOHNSON, BRENDA F JOHNSON, DEBRA J JOHNSON, JORGE A KERR, PAULA 0 KESTERSON, ELIZABETH W LAMBERT, BRENDAL LOVE, VICKI L LUCY, BRENDA F MADOOX, CYNTHIA I MALLETT, ORA 0 MATLOCK, NANCY S MCDOWELL, PATSY L MCILROY, Jill M MIMS, RICHARD L MIMS, SANORA J  MITCHELL, DIONNE E MOORE, CARRIE L MOORE, SHIRLEY A MORGAN, LULA MORGAN, SHIRLEY A MURPH, KATIE F NEAL, LI NOA K PETTUS, IOA M PICKARD, JIMMIE M PRESLAR, OTIS M WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER COONSELOR TEACHER MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOD AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA LIBRARIAN AIDE FOOR YR OLD PROGRA AIDE REGULAR BUDGET TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER MEDIA CLERK TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC CUSTOOIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 28 OELLWOOO DRIVE 316 NORTH PALM 1210 OOGWOOO TRL 1745 STURGIS ROAD 7824 BERT MARSH 9920 PROSPECT LOOP 3900 OAKWOOO ROAD 4201 HAZELWOOO 521 TREY LANE 10718 WARREN DRIVE 11500 CHICOT ROAD #132 16007 FOXMOOR DRIVE 8 OAK FOREST PLACE 804 EAST 31ST 20621 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 6920 MORGAN DRIVE 17409 BRADSHAW ROAD 5813 BASELINE #153 7407 HENDERSON ROAD 25 OELLWOOO 7424 SHADY GROVE LANE BOX 7008 GUINEVERE DRIVE 1419 COLLEGE 6307 DENHAM 1400 OLD FORGE OR APT 220 2615 FLAKEWOOO 27 KINGSBRIOGE 924 COIMERCE APT 15 #42 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE 9413 CQIISTOCK 1412 POINT WEST DRIVE 2415 JOHNSON 8901 KENNESAW 7009 GUINEVERE 4 HUNTINGTON ROAD 10714 WARREN 10714 WARREN DRIVE 11401 MESA OR APT F249 2200 RICE 9503 SOUTHWEST OR 4813 W 23RD 27 POINTER DRIVE 1916 WIGWAM 10009 FORRESTER COVE PO BOX 191042 8 WESTMONT CIRCLE P.O. BOX 23233 72209 72205 72032 72032 72103 72209 72205 72116 72032 72209 72103 72206 72113 71601 72135 72209 72206 72209 72209 72210 72209 72103 72209 72202 72209 72207 72207 72212 72202 72058 72209 72211 72204- 72103 72209 72207 72209 72209 72211 72202 72209 72204 72002 72032 72209 72209 72209 72221 565-5383 6646827 327-5998 329-4708 8884511 568-1471 666-7666 7536028 327-2325 5620746 8889519 851-3682 536-0183 8685209 5626314 8883646 455-4807 562-5943 568-1402 372-0388 2285240 6649514 224-7823 372-0810 679-3487 562-7152 221-3411 661-0743 455-2640 5656618 225-4720 568-3123 568-3123 221-7057 372-6447 562-1120 664-2547 4554257 329-0478 562-6283 565-9164 562-7581 228-9976 PUCKETT, PAIGE C TEACHER 1411 N SHACKLEFORD APT B 72211 2250072 ROSE, SARA G TEACHER 8109 MEL Ll,l(XJ) ROAD 72204 5687587 SABO, DEBBIE L TEACHER #16 BURNTTREE COURT 72212 SHANKS, BETH L TEACHER 1710 CALGARY TRAIL 72211 SIMPSON, KIMBERLY D TEACHER 8B ROSEMUNN 72205 2275356 SMITH, ALMA F COUNSELOR 5421 DREXEL 72209 5621552 SMITH, RUFUS CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 15621 ALEXANDER ROAD 72002 4551933 SMITH, s,p. WORKER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 6201 SENATE 72209 5686938 STORAY, JAMES CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 8401 W 36TH ST 72204 568-m4 SUMMONS, ELOISE W CUSTOOIAN 2109 BOULEVARD STREET 72204 6668967 THCIIAS, MATTIE M AIDE REGULAR BIJ)GET 1801 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE 72204 TIDWELL, CATHY V AIDE REGULAR BIJ)GET 1603 CHESTER APT 202 72206 374-4091 TORAN, STEVE A TEACHER 7515 GEYER SPRINGS #7B 72209 5681793 TUCKER, WILLIE L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 2824 HARPER ROAD 72015 7762346 WALKER, CAROL A AIDE SUPERVISION 10718 GALLAHAD 72209 5620101 WALKER, CONNIE S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 41 WELLFORD DRIVE 72209 5652173 WATKINS, RENEE L AIDE SUPERVISION 11500 CHICOT ROAD APT 23 72103 5684803 WELLS, JEANNIE L TEACHER 7311 OHIO 72207 WILLIAMS, ERMA J TEACHER 6605 ONYX DRIVE 72209 5686186 WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 923 CONNER AVENUE 72202 376-8012 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY Principal: Frederick Fields 6500 Hinkson Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4055 BETTON, SHERRI L TEACHER 6210 SHIRLEY DRIVE 72204 6636188 BUETTNER, SALLY G TEACHER 2904 SALLISAW DRIVE 72116 8355800 i CRISS, PAULINE W AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 9704 COMSTOCK 72209 I CUNNINGHAM, ELLENS TEACHER 7905 BRIARl,l(XJ) CIRCLE 72205 2253340 CURRY, JOANN SCHOOL NURSE 1923 MICHAEL DRIVE 72204 227-6854 DEDMON, NANCY A CUSTOOIAN 1113 RINGO 72202 3748702 DRIVER, OCIE A AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 3801 PINE CONE 72209 5651694 ELLIS, EDDIE M TEACHER 5120 WEST 24TH 72204 6641352 EPPERSON, BECKY J TEACHER 4511 BOWERS 72204 5659618 FIELDS, FREDERICK L ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5900 BUTLER ROAD LYNDELL 72209 5623334 FLANAGAN, VETA TEACHER P.O. BOX 4441 72116 6660122 GREGORY, NEA C AIDE SUPERVISION 6414 BASELINE RD APT 126 72209 HALL, DONNA R TEACHER 9621 COMSTOCK ROAD 72209 565-8677 I HIGGINS, NETTIE SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 9416 WOODFORD DRIVE 72209 5652377 HOBBS, BARBARA A CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 15019 RENA ROAD 72206 8886508 JACKSON, BENNIE AIDE REGULAR BUlllET 2108 BOULEVARD 72204 6647713 KLING, ALISA D TEACHER 112 LOWER RIDGE ROAD 72032 327-9544 LANGSTON, CALVIN AIDE SUPERVISION 10200 JUDY LANE 72209 LEIGH, MARGARET A TEACHER 12604 JANELLE 72212 2245520 MCCARTHER, GERALDINE TEACHER 2002 SHUMATE DRIVE 72212 MCCLAIN, MARION K TEACHER 10 WINDY COURT 72207 2278842 MCCLINA, MARY AIDE SUPERVISION 11620 WARREN ROAD 72209 5653662 MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M TEACHER 27 DOVE CREEK 72116 8351383 MILLER, GLORIA K TEACHER 1100 PATTON PLACE 72205 2232238 MOSBY, LORRAINE L COUNSELOR 2607 DAISY COVE 72204 NAGEL, DIANA K TEACHER 5219 HAWTHORNE 72207 6660060 NORMAN, CHERRY G LIBRARIAN 1901 BROKEN BOW 72116 8342097 PENNY, JACQUELINE F TEACHER 5721 CARLYLE DRIVE 72209 5682158 PHILLIPS, PENNY D MEDIA CLERK #8 WILLOW OAK COURT 72211 RAND, ALI CE C ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 72204 I ROLAX, SHIRLEY A TEACHER P.O. BOX 17362 72117 9452174 SANDERS, NORMA J AIDE FOUR YR OLD PROGRA 9613 MELON 72103 557.5939 I SIMPSON, ANGIE M SIMS, SHIRLEY C SMITH, ARBRADELLA B SNCAl\u0026gt;EN, SALLIE R SOLEE, DEBORAH L STUART, DOROTHY J TRIPCONY, WALDA D VANECKO, ALICE F WATERS, DORIS Z WILLIAMS, JEFFERY TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTOOIAN CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 6300 Hinkson Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4085 ABLES, FRANCES M ANDRESS, WILLIAMS ANDRUS, GEORGE C BAILEY, JOHNNY BATTIE, LINDA S BENSON, JESSIE J BEST, CHARLOTTE V BRADFORO, GAYLE B BRAGG, ALLEN R BROQl(S, KARTHA J BUFFALO, SUE Y BULLOCK, PATRICIA A BURNETTE, DENNIS R CAPOOT, MICHAEL G CHAMBERS, ANTHONY D COGSHELL, CARL L CRIPPS, JOSEPH D CRISWELL, DONICA M CURRY, JOANN DAVIDSON, KATHY L DAVIS, MARCUS D DAVIS, PHYLESIA DUERR, DONNA P EARLEYWINE, SONYA G EDWARDS, NORMA C ENOCH, LYDIA L ESAU, ERMA J ESTES, WILLIAM E FISHER, KENNETH L GAINES, SARA E GILBERT-WISE, M BARBARA GOLDSBY, LAVERNE G GRILLO, THERESA L GULLETT-SHELNUTT, TAMARA HAMILTON, ORALYN S HARRIS, ANNITHA J HARRIS, SHARON D HAWKING, NANCY G HILL, KATIE A HUNT, SAMUEL JOHNSON, JOHN C JOHNSON, VIOLA TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER TEACHER TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER COUNSELOR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF TEACHER TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER REGISTRAR WORKER  JR HIGH FOOO SER TEACHER BUILDING ENGINEER TEACHER TEACHER CCXJNSELOR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER 8802 ll(lJLDER LANE 6916 CLOVERDALE #4 TIMBER VALLEY COVE 18 LONGSTREET DRIVE 2618 SOUTH MAIN STREET RT 3 BOX 762 6904 SKYlXD #6 MALCOLM P.O BOX 55 # 2 SOUTHAVEN 72207 72209 72204 72206 72206 72104 72207 72209 72079 72209 Prlnclpal: Gayle Bradford 124 PINE VALLEY RD 3019 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE 1908 SYLVIA STREET 6617 MEADOWLARK LANE P.O. BOX 440 13200 CHENAL PARKWAY #205 7312 RICHlXD 4716 EASTlXD 3713 PINECONE DRIVE 1107 RONlXD DRIVE 6705 lXDFIELD 1820 SANFORD #1 5903 TROUT #20 YORKTON 1715 JOHNSON #10 CHRISTY LANE 1812 RESERVOIR RD #217 1923 MICHAEL DRIVE 420 MESA DRIVE APT H25 2310 RIJ41NE ROAD 3419 ARAPAHO TR 105 ENGLElXD ROAD 16509 OTTER CREEK PARKWAY 4222 AREHART DRIVE 35 SUGAR BERRY 7311 KENTUCKY STREET 11401 MESA DRIVE APT 322 7900 BURNELLE DRIVE 2403 S. LCXJISIANA STREET 2024 SOUTH SUMMIT 7210 AMHERST DRIVE 62 CHEROKEE DRIVE 5 RIO GRANDE FOREST 1701 WESTPARK APT 238 1726 DURlXD STREET 2902 HINSON ROAD 1019 NORTH POLK 5813 BASELINE RD APT 76 72207 72207 71923 72209 72002 72002 72211 72207 72204 72209 72207 72209 72207 72002 72209 72204 72118 72205 72204 72211 72204 72209 72207 72209 72209 72209 72065 72207 72211 72209 72206 72204 72205 72002 72212 72204 72015 72212 72209 72006 72205 72209 225-0373 568-2615 562-5820 490-2431 332-8671 664-5089 562-0015 397-2723 562-5097 663-6100 228-5416 246-6211 455-5633 225-0590 663-4404 568-6847 568-5559 225-4531 565-7235 227-9093 794-0990 565-6530 851-6515 227-6854 223-9758 223-3072 666-3918 455-1447 568-7088 888-3630 663-1111 227-0668 565-5813 375-9522 372-4015 847-0712 224-7256 778-6213 223-3335 347-2031 568-8272 JONES, JACK A COUNSELOR 1100 N. RICHARDSON PLACE no22 8474884 KIRCHNER, LESSIE A TEACHER no, AMHERST n205 661-0932 LAMII, CAROLYN F TEACHER 10813 VALIANT DRIVE n209 565-1069 LEAKS, ALVESTER ACTING ASSISTANT HEAD ClJS 306 SHORT n,11 LESTER, PATTY A WORKER  JR HIGH FOOO SER 7704 BERT MARSH LANE n103 8887646 LOVELACE, DOROTHY J TEACHER 8 BLACKJACK COURT n204 455-3913 MARTINEK, DARLENE B SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 4 PEBBLE BEACH COURT n212 224-4634 MAYBERRY, BONNIE B TEACHER 2501 BENNETT ROAD no15 7786587 MCFADDEN, CHARLES TEACHER n204 6642888 MCKENNA, JULIANNE TEACHER 2319 N ARTHUR n201 661-9256 MILLIGAN, JENNIFER H TEACHER n201 MITCHELL, SANDRA A TEACHER 11 CHERRYWOOO COURT n211 223-2735 NOHUIIDRO, THOMAS S TEACHER 5808 B STREET #3B n2os 562-1390 MOSELEY, FRAN N TEACHER 1215 lioQOOLAND PARK RO no15 847-4046 NIEDERBRACH, JAY A TEACHER 7312 H STREET n205 2809712 OSHIRO, NIDIA TEACHER 6900 CANTRELL APT 03 n201 PALMER, BARBARA S WORKER  JR HIGH FOOO SER 8201 ORCHARD DRIVE n209 562-2262 PARKER, PATTI J TEACHER 7518 REDlioQOO n209 568-6750 PATTERSON, DAVID H ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 9224 WEST MARKHAM n205 2274885 PIKE, PERRY R TEACHER 9522 NORTH POINT ROAD n135 8684TT4 POORE', PATRICIA A TEACHER 3618 SHAMROCK DRIVE 71603 879-5316 RALEY, BEVERLY A TEACHER 49 SOUTHERN OAICS n209 562-8860 RELFORD, YOLANDA L MEDIA CLERK P.O. BOX 4483 n214 RUSH, LAWRENCE R TEACHER 601 NAPA VALLEY DRIVE #21 n211 227-0229 SAMONS, KATHRYN M TEACHER 10 NOTTINGHAM ROAD APT 2 n205 664-n56 SEAIIOOO, GREGORY E TEACHER 8016 WINTERIIOa) DRIVE n209 562-3826 SIMPSON, MITCHELL CUSTOOIAN  PART TINE 1434 WEST BASEL! NE n209 4551954 SNITH, GAIL P TEACHER #3 ARAPAHO COURT n209 SNITH, SUSAN M TEACHER 2105 CEDAR CREEK ROAD n116 835-8144 SOUTHERLAND, TERRY D TEACHER 3125 HWY 5 N no15 847-4327 I STARLING, LILLIAN L TEACHER 223 FOUNTAIN n205 375-1622 TOMLINSON, E. LIANNE TEACHER 9 N. MEADOWCLI FF n209 565-7497 UICETUI, IKE T TEACHER P.O. BOX 2692 n203 562-6602 VANPELT, SHARON E TEACHER 303 WEST NJN STREET n116 753-3693 WALKER, All\u0026gt;REY M MANAGER JR HIGH FOOO SE 1504 GLENDA DRIVE n205 2232294 WARREN, JIJ\u0026gt;ITH L TEACHER 2651 BRUCE no32 327-4762 WASHINGTON, DWIGHT B CUSTOOIAN  ASST HEAD 5805 EAST 46TH STREET n,11 945-0585 I WASHINGTON, ESTHER N SECRETARY ATTENOANCE 2104 NAO I SON n204 663-1335 WEBB, THOMAS C TEACHER 803 CARMICHAEL no22 847-3149 WHITEHEAD, SHELIA L WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER n209 WICKLIFFE, ALICE E TEACHER n118 I WILLIAMS, BRUCE B ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 43 WARREN DRIVE APT #37 n209 6643871 WILLIAMS, HENRY L ClJSTOOIAN 401 WEST 22ND STREET n114 WILLIAMS, SYLVIA CUSTOOIAN 3200 GILMAN n204 225-4124 WOLFE, CAROLYN S TEACHER 5323 COUNTRY CLUB BLVD n201 225-2063 DODD ELEMENTARY Principal: Patricia NcNeal 6423 Stagecoach Rd Little Rock, AR 72204 455-7430 BEALER, LINDA F AIDE REGULAR BIJ\u0026gt;GET 915 SOUTH !)AK n204 663-0848 BLUE, SUSAN D TEACHER 11300 VINE STREET n103 4551036 CHILDERS, SUSAN B TEACHER 35 SOUTH IIOOOLAND DRIVE no32 327-3089 CHILLIEST, WANDA J AIDE  TITLE VI B INSTRUC 504 HARRINGTON AVENUE n202 374-4656 DAVIS, DORIS J WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 9711 MELON LANE n103 557-2615 DAVIS, MANSI ICAY TEACHER 2217 LOOICOUT no32 327-3342 DAVIS, PHILLIP L TEACHER 2205 FOREST CREEK ORIVE n211 221-9016 D ' DAY, LORICE AIDE SUPERVISION 1713 EAST 19TH STREET DENTON, YVETTE M 72202 374-5493 TEACHER 801 S. ROONEY PARHAM #35E 72205 221-3082 DOSS, JIMMY F AIDE SUPERVISION 6811 HINKSON ROAD 72209 FLANAGAN, VETA TEACHER P.O. BOX 4441 72116 666-0122 FLEMING, DEOOIS D TEACHER 10 LAMONT DRIVE 72209 FRAIILEY, ELIZABETH J TEACHER C/0 J STEVENS 14700 HWY 1 72002 HARE, VALER IE T TEACHER 18 WINDSOR DRIVE 72209 562-7147 HENRIKSEN, ANITA M TEACHER 3105 DOG\\j()(X) TRAIL 72032 327-9801 HUIE, WANDA L TEACHER 2818 SALEM ROAD 72015 794-4063 IVORY, JOSEPH CUSTOOIAN 3205 BATTERY 72206 374-8313 JACICSOII, VERNITA FAYE TEACHER 5300 BASELINE APT 12B 72209 5683704 JEFFERSON, CYNTHIA B TEACHER 5813 BASELINE ROAD #235 72209 568-1362 JOHNSON, SOLQOI CUSTOOIAN 3116 BISHOP 72206 374-5228 KENNEDY, BARBARA A LIBRARIAN 21 HAYFIELD 72207 224-9703 LEWIS, PATSY II TEACHER 83 PLANTATION ACRES DRIVE 72210 455-5829 MAJOR, JACQUELINE CClJNSELOR 10002 RONALD DRIVE 72205 225-2856 MAIITIN, MALINDA H TEACHER 4710 SAM PECK RD APT 1195 72212 224-7459 MCNEIL, PATRICIA A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 2812 RESERVOIR ROAD 72205 221-1608 MEEKS, JULIE A TEACHER 11217 SHACKLEFORD C\u0026lt;lJRT 72211 223-2085 MITCHELL, BEVERLY S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 313 WEST 33RD PLACE 72118 753-6144 MITCHELL, VICICYE Y TEACHER tl7 BLACKJACK CT 72204 455-0857 NAGEL, DIANA K TEACHER 5219 HAWTHORNE 72207 666-0060 NORTHCUTT, DENISE E MEDIA CLERK 702 NORTH OAK 72110 354-1292 PARKER, ANGELA R AIDE SUPERVISION 3018 WOLFE 72206 376-0396 RAINES, ANNIE M TEACHER 5609 NORTH LOCUST 72116 758-4093 RIDDLE, BRENDA J TEACHER 3301 WEST 10TH 72204 663-1519 SHERIDAN, WILLIAM L TEACHER 9201 KANIS ROAD 15-G 72205 224-1148 SNITH, VALERIE J ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 510 S. MAPLE 72205 666-4980 SNYDER, FLOYD R CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 13201 PITTS ROAD 72206 888-7633 STEELMAN, CAROLYN C TEACHER 6500 LOIIGWOOO 72207 664-1692 THOMAS, DARLENE C AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 8706 HERRICK LANE 72209 565-8757 THOMAS, JIMMIE D MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOOD 64 WEST WINDSOR 72209 562-2906 WORICMAN, HELEN J WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 15420 SARDIS ROAD 72103 847-3791 DUNBAR JR. HIGH Principal: Nancy Acre 1100 Wright Ave Llttle Rock, AR 72206 324-2440 ACRE, GLENDON L TEACHER 68 PIN OAK LOOP 72113 851-3886 ACRE, NANCY L SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 68 PIN OAK LOOP 72113 851-3886 AVERY, BELINDA CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 3719 WEST 11TH 72204 AX, EDITH R TEACHER BELL, LINDA K 72207 223-4898 TEACHER 32 PARK HAVEN DRIVE 72205 225-3109 BLACKSHER, ROOERICK L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 6414 BASELINE APT 32 72209 375-0422 BRADLEY, MILDRED CUSTOOIAN P.O. BOX 164116 72216 374-9531 BROWN, MICHAEL L CUSTOOIAN P.O. BOX 4394 72214 223-9598 BURGESS, RYAN ROCHELL TEACHER 431 MCCAIN BLVD HIGHCLIFF 72116 791-0043 BURK, BOBBYE H TEACHER 10910 BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE 72211 224-0265 BURNS, JOE TEACHER 87 BAME CIRCLE 72022 847-2857 CARTER, LINDA B WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 1214 WEST 24TH STREET 72206 374-0423 CARTER, MELBA D TEACHER CLARK, ALICE Z 72118 REGISTRAR 3 ROSEMOOR DRIVE 72209 568-0652 CLAYBORN, NATHAN L TEACHER 6901 CAMELOT 72209 568-5828 COLE, BETTYE A TEACHER 1316 WEST 21ST STREET 72206 375-5945 COLE, JIA\u0026gt;Y K SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 9017 DAWN DRIVE 72103 888-4178 COLLINS, JULIE MAIITIN TEACHER 601 NAPA VALLEY 72211 COOi(, CHARLES J TEACHER 11810 PLEASANT RIDGE #601 72212 223-2741 COWELL, JEFFREYS TEACHER 88 WEST WINDSOR n209 DAVIS, RICHARD A COONSELOR 13601 BECKENHAM n212 228-6638 DEAN, OSCAR L TEACHER 1901 STYLER STREET n204 663-3528 DICKERSON, BOBBIE J MANAGER JR HIGH FOCO SE 4101 LOOWIG n204 DONOVAN, FAITH R TEACHER 68 WARWICK DRIVE n205 225-2159 OUICE, LORRIE ANII TEACHER #24 SYLVIA no32 329-8868 DUNN, RHONDA T TEACHER 14309 HIGHPOINT OR n211 EDMONDS, IIEIIA R TEACHER 2 EASTWOOO OAKS no32 329-3410 FLAIi i GAN, LAURA A TEACHER 8900 TANYA DRIVE APT B n204 GEORGE, LI SA H TEACHER 611 COORT SUITE 3 no32 GRAVES, 0011 K TEACHER ff7 TWIii PINE PLACE n209 455-5631 GROSS, JOHNNY E TEACHER 50 GLENMERE n204 663-7962 HARRIS, HERBERT E TEACHER 2824 GI l.MAII n204 HOBBS, LAWRENCE E BUILOIIIG ENGINEER 15023 RENA ROAD n206 888-2483 HOEY, MARYS TEACHER 6416 WOOOFIELD DRIVE n209 568-5525 HONEA, ALICE J MEDIA CLERK #1 BAY MEADOW CT n209 562-0861 HOWARD, MARGARET A aJSTOOIAII  PART TIME 8421 WEST 36TH n204 223-4859 HOOSON, ELOOISE J ASST PRINCIPAL SECONOAR 18 SAXONY CIRCLE n209 562-2078 JACKSON, GERTIE B TEACHER 1309 HENDRIX AVENUE n204 JACKSON, HARRY B aJSTOOIAII  PART TIME P.O. BOX 164116 n216 374-9531 JAMES, DONNELL ASST PRINCIPAL SECONOAR P.O. BOX 1134 n115 758-7012 JAMES, MARTHA M TEACHER 3552 II OLIVE n116 n1-0751 JOHNSON, ISAAC L TEACHER 108 CALAIS COVE n211 JOHNSON, LARA 0 TEACHER no22 JONES, FREDDIE L TEACHER 9313 TIMBER VALLEY RD n204 568-8054 LEWIS, JOYCE A WORKER JR HIGH FOCO SER 7 BARBARA CIRCLE n204 LOGAN, ANDREW 0 TEACHER 500 TRIVISTA RIGHT 71913 623-9598 MCDONALD, THOMAS A TEACHER 314 NORTH ASH n205 663-7063 MCGREW, MARILYN II SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 1101 II BRYAN n201 666-8457 MOORE, BABBYE R TEACHER 21 LEXINGTON DRIVE 71602 2473n1 IIJNOY, SAM T TEACHER 1226 WASHINGTON n204 IIJRRAY, LENORA E TEACHER RT 2 BOX 16 n064 255-3679 NEWTON, KENNETH TEACHER 614 VALMAR STREET n205 661-1581 OLDS, ARTHUR C TEACHER 23 SANDSTONE no32 329-6106 OSMON, DAVIDS TEACHER #21 LIBERTY CREEK no32 796-3049 PARSONS JR, OOAS E TEACHER 7617 BRIARWOOO CIRCLE n205 224-2410 PEACE, PAMELA J TEACHER 3704 DORAL n212 227-8490 RICHARDSON, JIMMY L CUSTOOIAN 1001 BOOKER n204 664-0314 ROBINSON, ROBERT F TEACHER 2501 RIVERFRONT DR APT B1 n202 663-9797 ROBINSON, VERA M WORKER JR HIGH FOCO SER 2301 STATE n206 374-5227 ROOGERS, CLAll\u0026gt;IA A TEACHER 3 TALL TIMBER COVE n204 SHAVERS, GREGORY B TEACHER 208 EAST 44TH n111 945-7190 SLATER, JOYCE A COONSELOR 412 SUNNYMEADE n205 221-0755 SMITH, MARY A TEACHER 6307 SHERRY DRIVE n204 STANLEY, ROLAND J TEACHER 10300 JANA DRIVE n209 562-2343 TAYLOR, FRANCES D TEACHER 3834 LOCHRIDGE n116 791-3070 TERRY, P. DAWN TEACHER n113 TOLLETTE, SAMMIE II LIBRARIAN 2715 S CHESTER n206 375-7896 UNDERWOOO, JOYCE M TEACHER 10918 YOSEMITE VALLEY DR n212 225-5755 WATSON, CHARLES E' TEACHER 9220 CERELLE DRIVE n2os 224-4734 WILBURD, MANYTHIA WORKER JR HIGH FOCO SER 1700 WEST LONG 1nH STREE n114 375-1944 WILLIAMS, STEPHEN G TEACHER 4423 WEYMOOTH DRIVE n209 562-4893 WITTENBERG, LILLIAN P SCHOOL NURSE 7 WOOOSONG n135 868-5088 - r FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY Principal: Barbara Means 818 N. Harrison St Uttle Rock, AR 72205 871-6260 UOYI, REBECCA A TEACHER 5217 COUNTRY CLUB BLIID UCH, CLAIRE E n201 6641734 NEAL TECHNICIAN F000 SE 5817 c STREET 72205 6666674 CAMP, UIGGETTE L MEDIA CLERIC 3407 S CHESTER m06 375-6820 CAMP, WINNIE S SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 3423 CHESTER n206 374.9545 CARTER, CALVIN ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAS ATTE 8111 WEST 33TH n204 2254511 CIIEATNNI, FLORENCE L ACADEMIC SUPP\u0026lt;JIT LAS ~TTE 1415 NORTHWICIC C0UlT n207 2276452 DAILEY, GENEVA WORKER  ELEM F000 SERVIC 2011 VALNAII n204 DELOZIER, IWIY GAIL TEACHER 801 SOUTH ROONEY PMNNI I 72205 EASOI, TAIITNA AIDE SUPERVISION P. 0 BOX 151 n183 197-5160 NEAD, SANDRA L TEACHER 7820 WEST CAP !Tot. 11201 n205 NOlNES, MICHAELE CUSTOOIAN mos ISUN, MARGARET V LIBRARIAN 1915 ICINBERLY DRIVE n205 2276012 JANES, CHARLOTTE A TEACHER 153 LAKESIDE DRIVE n204 5623696 JOIINSQN, KEVIN AIDE REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 1305 VINE STREET n114 3752210 JOI.WERT, KATHY A TEACHER 13 110GA11 COVE n113 8513833 JUNIEL, ICATHON TEACHER 8701 INTERSTATE 30 APT 17 n209 5684186 ICOOELL, VALERIE IC TEACHER 25 COLONY mo1 2233888 LANIERT, EDITH Y TEACHER 10100 SUFFOllC DRIVE n204 LEWIS, LEE E TEACHER 5919 PECAN LAKE DRIVE m04 IIASQN, ERNEST L CUSTOOIAN 3332 GREEN OR 72209 5657680 MEANS, BARBARA W ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 33 NINE HILL DRIVE n118 7538294 NOIX, DEBORAH A COUNSELOR 3 RUSSWOOO n211 2251995 OGDEN, IWIOl.YN F TEACHER 2701 IIENTlXX\u0026gt; VALLEY OR n212 2256904 PMR, GLORIA L TEACHER 1919 S STATE n206 3n2395 PEARSCII, BOYCE TEACHER 2016 EAST 4TH n202 3n3267 POWELL, ROSIE N TEACHER P.O. BOX 225 n203 6640551 PRICE, BEATRICE TEACHER 4312 WEST 20TH n204 6665686 RACKLEY, LINDA G AIDE SUPERVISION 3418 LONGCOY STREET m04 RICE, OPAL E TEACHER 5013 STONEWALL ROAD n201 6635145 I RILEY, LEAN A TEACHER 4314 lXX\u0026gt;LAWN mos 6669279 II ROGERS, JOA L WORKER JR HIGH F000 SER ROOTE 1 BOX 181 nOT6 9852748 SHEIIWOa), SHERRY TEACHER 11907 PLEASANT FOREST ORI n212 2289278 SNITH, LUCILLE B AIDE FOUR YR ot.O PROGRA 8 SAXONY DRIVE n206 5628423 THOIPSON, SANDRA L TEACHER 501 NORTH MCADOO n2os 6636055 TURNER, MARILYN E TEACHER 2921 LENNOX DRIVE n204 2245148 WASHINGTON, COLA V WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 4815 WEST 11TH n204 6645580 I FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH Principal: Richard Maple 5901 Evergreen Uttle Rock, AR 72205 671-6390 BAILEY, ROSALYN S TEACHER 3014 ECHO VALLEY OR n201 2275510 BEGGS, MELINDA J TEACHER 1200 CORNFLCIIER n116 8343456 IIRGE, ANN A TEACHER 108 GLEN DRIVE n201 BLACK, LORI L TEACHER 610 CHAUCER 72076 9851292 BLANZENSICJ, REBECCA A BOOICICEEPER 512 GREEN NOONTAIN CIR 11 n211 2211096 BOlOON, GENEVA AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 1112 PULASKI n202 3743604 BOYLE, JULIA L COONSELOR ,no EAST 38TH n206 3752646 BRADSHER, PATRICIA J TEACHER 14923 CANTRELL n212 8685389 UJN, ANTOINETTE N TEACHER 2317 FOREST CREEK DRIVE n211 2286173 MISCOE Ill, JOSEPH W TEACHER 1903 N MCKINLEY STREET n201 6630953 I_. BROWN, ADRIENNE TEACHER 1216 WEST 26TH n206 374-5857 BRUCELIPKINS, ETHER L TEACHER 2310 SOUTH STATE n206 375-5434 BUCKELEW, MACKIE G TEACHER 600 N HUGHES n205 663-7963 BUFFALO, SUE Y COUNSELOR 1107 RONl.000 DRIVE n201 225-4531 CAMPBELL, PATSY R COUNSELOR 4309 \"I\" STREET n205 6631508 CARR, RONALD L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4704 PRINCETON n204 664-6162 CARR, STEPHANIE B TEACHER 1 POll\u0026gt;ERHORN COURT n212 221-2581 CLAYTON, TERRY L TEACHER 1910 N TYLER ST n201 COBBS, NARY J TEACHER 1301 WEST 1nH 71603 536-7170 COLE, LEIGH TEACHER 7500 EVERGREEN n201 664-5811 CRAIG, SHERRY A TEACHER 14601 RIDGEl.000 DRIVE n211 223-8582 CRCJ4EDY, VERNON TEACHER 1105 S CLEVELAND n204 CROSS, NANCY B TEACHER 3301 ROCKY COURT n201 223-2679 DAVIS, LAVERA J TEACHER 3 PATRICIA LANE n205 227-4960 DODSON, VINCENT R TEACHER 6603 SHERRY DR n204 DOUCET, KARIN P TEACHER 23400 LAIJSON ROAD n210 DREW JR, DANIELL TEACHER 19 KOKO n120 835-0330 DUNCAN, DELOIS L WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 3605 ELAM n204 DUNCAN, EDWARD A TEACHER 6310 SHIRLEY DRIVE n204 664-2126 FINKBEINER, CHRISTIANNE TEACHER 6619 KAVANAUGH PLACE n201 661-1523 FORE, LISA K TEACHER 205 CHIMNEY ROCK DRIVE n116 834-5008 GILLUM, JO H SCHOOL NURSE 1704 TARRYTOWN n201 225-1882 GREEN II, TROY W TEACHER #6 MERIDITH COURT APT \"H\" n201 224-8403 GUY, NARY S TEACHER 2400 RIVERFRONT #2835 n202 663-5932 HARRIELL, LARRY L CUSTODIAN 923 MAXWELL n202 376-7315 HENRY, JC TEACHER 7918 PARKl.000 DR n204 225-43n HENSLEY, ELSIE WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 4707 FOSTER n204 562-0448 HILL, DORA B WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 13309 ASHER ROAD n206 897-4376 HOLLCMAY, GLENN TEACHER 2109 RCJ41NE n205 JENKINS, PATRICIA R ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5411 WEST 13TH 71603 562-6679 JOHNSON, ANNIE M WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER n205 JOHNSON, VIVIAN E TEACHER 1805 WEST 18TH n202 376-3901 JONES, EDWARD L TEACHER 505 GREEN MTN CIRCLE #38 n211 228-7031 KIDD, LILLIE TEACHER 3625 VAUGINE 71601 534-4632 KORNEGAY, BETTY D LIBRARIAN 11 RIATA COURT n209 565-0893 KRUGER, MARILYN A TEACHER 820 OUACHITA CIRCLE n205 664-0807 MAPLE JR, RICHARD L SECONDARY PRINCIPAL 417 DEL RIO n205 663-7919 MCCLELLAND, BERNARD CUSTODIAN 1120 RICE APT N n202 MCFADDEN, SANDRA L TEACHER 6620 STERLING DR n204 666-4288 MCMURRAY, PATRICIA A ASST PRINCIPAL  SECONDAR 1 SPUR COVE n211 223-5174 MILLER, EMMA A REGISTRAR 1812 RESERVOIR ROAD #175A n201 228-7920 MUELLER, CATHERINE J TEACHER #11 LUDINGTON COVE n201 NICHOLS, ROBERT N TEACHER 11001 MERLIN COURT n209 565-2617 NORRIS, MABEL WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 3411 WEST 10TH STREET n204 NORTHCUTT, DENISE E MEDIA CLERK 702 NORTH OAK n110 354-1292 NUNIS, HAROLD S TEACHER 6515 LONGl.000 n201 663-3356 PIKE, LISA R TEACHER 3655 HWY 60 no32 327-4461 POOLE, THCJIAS TEACHER 12 BAY STREET n204 227-4830 PURDY, NARY M CUSTODIAN HEAD 122 WEST DRIVE no15 n6-o512 RANKIN, SHARON L WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 16921 HWY. 10 n212 RUTTER JR, WILLIAM L SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 4900 PRINCETON DRIVE n204 6641152 SHELMAN, SARAH E SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 6612 GRANADA n205 666-8838 STALEY, JERRY L TEACHER 515 WEST FIFTEENTH STREET n202 376-1284 STOLZER, PATSY N WORKER JR HIGH FOOD SER 36 GOLDLAKE CLUB ROAD no32 STRIBLET, PATRICIA AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1104 W 29TH n206 375-0793 TATE, HELEN M TEACHER 7101 MABELVALE CUTOFF n209 568-4220 TAYLOR, DIANNE F TEACHER 803 COUNTY CLUB RD n116 835-6864 THESSING, GLENDA C TEACHER 504 TRUMPLER n211 223-3531 THOCAS, MICHAEL C TEACHER 2803 CHARTER OAK n201 225-2950 THOCASOII, MARIAN M TEACHER 2500 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE n201 225-4851 THQU\u0026gt;SON, LAlo'IIENCE QJSTOOIAN  ASST HEAD 2106 S HAIIRISON n204 6661919 TOOi\u0026gt;, LINDA E TEACHER 624 CHOCTAW CIR nzos 6661249 TUCII:, VIRGINIA C TEACHER 49 BRADFORD n207 2250357 WALLACE, DORA J TEACHER 2112 Rc41NE ROAD nzos 2280623 WASHAM, RICHARD R TEACHER 15 PINE BLUFF ROAD no32 470-3524 WEEMs, JOYCE 0 MANAGER JR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SE 17102 N ALEXAHDER RO LOT noo2 WHITEHORN, DANIEL W ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 12903 MORRISON ROAD n212 2285325 IIILLIAMS, GINGER L TEACHER 1532 OAlCWOOD CIRCLE n104 9222345 WILLIAMS, KATHY L TEACHER P.O. BOX 4813 n214 WILLIAMS, TONYA N TEACHER 3501 WH ITEF !ELD n204 2275883 WILLIAMSON, NANETTE E TEACHER 9909 SATTERFIELD DR nzos 2257133 ZAICRZEWSKI, MERRY C TEACHER 7901 HENDERSON ROAD nz10 4550956 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY Principal: Virginia Ashley 1600 N. Tyler Uttle Rock, AR 72207 671-6267 ALEXANDER, CAROLYN A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7425 FAIRFIELD n209 ALLISON, !DONAR AIDE SUPERVISION 3204 WEST 13TH STREET n204 66103n ARNOLD, PORTIA M TEACHER 4223 GINGER DRIVE no15 7941086 ASHLEY, VIRGINIA B ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11706 PLEASANT RIDGE DR# n212 2252990 BATTS, KATHY 11 AIDE SUPERVISION 904 CAMPUS n114 3748954 BOYCE, MARY L LIBRARIAN 2200 ANDOVER COORT APT 70 n201 225-nn BROWN, GEORGE OJSTOOIAN  PART TIME 1410 SPRING APT 6 n202 CALLAHAN, STEPHANIE R TEACHER 2201 WESTERMAN DRIVE no15 7780242 CLEMENTS, CAROLYN C TEACHER 415 NORTH PALM n205 6648662 COLE, CAROLYN S MEAL TECHNICIAN FOOD SE 3226 BATTERY n206 3766939 COLLINS, CYNTHIA R TEACHER 1221 RESERVOIR ROAD #273 n201 2213540 COIBS, BUENAH H TEACHER 6600 KEllloOOO n201 6666296 CRAMER, KATHY L WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 431 MCCAIN BLVD n114 7580916 DARBY, EVELYN J AIDE SUPERVISION 3001 EAST WASHINGTON n114 9453906 EVANS, MYRTLE D COONSELOR 2309 BATTERY n206 3742931 FAULKNER, LISA E TEACHER 6412 A SANDPIPER n205 6610205 GESTAUT, HELEN F TEACHER 11109 SABINE VALLEY DRIVE n212 2239842 GHANT, JANET M TEACHER 1715 LEWIS n204 6667054 GINNAVEN, ELLEN J TEACHER 11714 PLEASANT RIDGE DR# n212 221-90n GORDON, JANICE L TEACHER 10 StJIMERHILL CT n211 2278857 HARRIS, EARNESTINE WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC ,no BARRCM ROAD APT 69 n205 225-6563 HUNT, MARIETTA S TEACHER 1904 MILL CREEK n116 7711418 KEARNEY, MAPLE J TEACHER P.O. BOX 45933 n214 5627348 KITCHENS, DON E QJSTOOIAN  HEAD 6105 BATTLE ROAD n209 5688715 LANEHART, FRANS MEDIA CLERK 2700 MONTREAL n204 2255981 LEMLE, NETTIE S TEACHER n212 LUSBY, MARY 8 SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 216 SCHOOLloOOO LANE n201 6643981 MACHEN, JANET A TEACHER 1427 N UNIVERSITY# N 328 n201 6667557 MEVAWALA, BARBARA GAIL TEACHER 14309 SHEPARD DR n212 8684652 MOLDEN, HcIER L OJSTOOIAN 2117 SOUTH VALMAR n204 6647388 MOORE, CYNTHIA C TEACHER 5024 STONEWALL n201 6639185 PAIGE, CYNTHIA AIDE REGULAR BlllGET 1716 JUNIOR DEPUTY ROAD n205 2219425 RUSSELL, TAJUANA I TEACHER 1809 TULANE AVENUE n202 375.9570 SIGNAIGO, CYNTHIA L TEACHER 1517 ALBERTA n201 2244378 STILES, DONNA II TEACHER 15 NOB VIEW n205 2251607 TITSWORTH, TERESA L TEACHER 1802 ALDEN APT 1 n201 664n34 TURNER, ALVIN D TEACHER 206 RHONDA STREET 71923 2467025 WALLIS, ERICA LYNN TEACHER 3 STONEBROOK COURT n211 2275033 WENGER, CAROLYN J TEACHER 18 HAYFIELD DRIVE n201 227-5381 WHITEERWIN, PATRICIA K TEACHER #4 NOB HILL no32 3275203 WILLIAMS, KENNETH L AIDE SUPERVISION 2123 LABETTE MANOR DR #21 n202 221-3760 WILSON, GLORIA P TEACHER 4216 TATUM n204 565-0483 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY Prlnclpal: Franklin Davis 1701 South Harrison Little Rock, AR 72204 671-6380 ADAMS, PAMELA KATE TEACHER 501 NAPA VALLEY APT n5 n210 221-0269 ANDERSON, BARRY L AIDE  DESEGREGATION 1000 VICTORY STREET n202 374-3679 BATSON, JIM P TEACHER 10 WESTWOOO LN n204 565-5905 BELT, RONALD C CUSTOOIAN 607 WEST 33RD STREET n206 568-8277 BRADFORD, GLADYS M TEACHER 916 CONNER AVE n202 375-2704 BRM, CAROL A LIBRARIAN 1701 WESTPARK #174 n204 663-3048 BRUCE, JACQUELYN D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4913 WEST 18TH n204 BUCK, JENNIFER L TEACHER 102 KEVIN COVE no22 847-0120 CALLAWAY, MARSHA A TEACHER 1412 N. MELLON n201 666-7095 CARPENTER, MARYL TEACHER 33 OPHELIA DRIVE n113 851-3224 CARTER, KAREN A TEACHER 19118 DENNY ROAD n211 821-2113 CATO, VERNADA L ACADEMIC SUPPORT WRITING 1702 ARROWHEAD RD APT A n118 791-0765 CHANDLER Ill, HILTON C AIDE DESEGREGATION 1009 MARTIN LUTHER KING D n202 375-5654 COKELEY, GWENDOLYN 0 TEACHER P.O. BOX 192884 n219 565-3601 COLEMAN, THELMA MEDIA CLERK P.O. BOX 21512 n221 225-8281 CRENSHAW, ORAL COUNSELOR P.O. BOX 7095 n116 834-5173 DAVIS, FRANKLIN A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 11 MOCKINGBIRD LANE 72032 329-8722 DAVIS, LANITA J TEACHER 21009 SARDIS ROAD 72103 557-5924 DAVIS, WAVERLY Y TEACHER 2516 DORCHESTER DRIVE 72204 223-2586 OOZIER, PRESTON CUSTOOIAN 5201 GEYER SPRINGS APT 34 72204 568-7110 EDDY, JANICE M TEACHER P.O. BOX 360 72023 843-6466 FLEMING, TAMMIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT WRITING 96 MONROE DRIVE 72204 661-9722 FOWLER, EARLENE W TEACHER 1314 WEST 15TH 72202 375-9255 GARNER, DEBRA A TEACHER 5813 BASELINE ROAD #246 72209 565-8423 GETER, LAVERNE AIDE - DESEGREGATION 2417 EAST 2ND 72114 376-4592 GILES, ALMEDA TEACHER 1770 BARROW RD. #96 72204 221-2779 GRAY, CAROLYN W TEACHER 1607 SHUMATE 72212 227-5928 GRAY, LOO A TEACHER 6315 GREENWOOO 72207 661-9324 HALEY, IRIS J WORKER - ELEM FOOD SERVIC #7 SOJTHMONT DRIVE 72209 562-8147 HAMMONS, BRENDA J TEACHER 35 NORTH MEADOWCLIFF 72209 562-5244 HARDY, WILLIE D AIDE REGULAR IIU)GET 7200 GLEN OAK DRIVE 72209 568-6234 HARRIS, LUVENIA M AIDE - SUPERVISION n204 HENRY, SADIE A AIDE - FOOR YR OLD PROGRA 4721 TIMBERLAND n204 455-1547 HIGHT, REBECCA R TEACHER 1808 MILL CREEK 72116 758-8396 HOOD, MARTHA CAROLYN AIDE - DESEGREGATION 1708 S HARRISON 72204 661-0378 !SLAM, ARIE M AIDE - DESEGREGATION P.O.BOX 192113 72219 568-6749 JACKSON, CYNTHIA M WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC n206 JACKSON, GLORIA J ACADEMIC SUPPORT WRITING 5721 TRENTON LANE n209 565-7811 JAMES, SANDRA S CllJNSELOR 3700 CANTRELL APT 709 n202 661-0531 JOHNSON, MARILYN F TEACHER #8 TANYA CllJRT 72204 225-6918 JORDAN, DEMETRIA A TEACHER 529 MELANIE LANE n118 KEATHLEY, DEANA M SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL 8815 NANCY PLACE n204 562-4246 LAWRENCE, PAMELA E AIDE - DESEGREGATION 3720 TUDOR DRIVE n204 227-0638 LEE, WILLATHAL WORKER ELEM FOOD SERVIC 3316 MARYLAND 72204 MACON, BETTIE J WORKER - ELEM FOOD SERVIC 1301 SOJTH JACKSON 72204 MATHENY, JUNE W TEACHER 8225 ALVIN LANE 72207 MCCLENDON, ESSIE TEACHER 3700 80',IERS n204 565-6353 MCFARLAND, BILLY C TEACHER 500 NAPA VALLEY DRIVE APT n211 223-2839 MCINTOSH, SANDRA G SECRETARY ATTENDANCE 5824 WEST 14TH 72204 666-1438 MCNULTY, LEANNE TEACHER 7709 WEST 29TH 72204 227-6416 MOIITGCJIERY, JADE B TEACHER 2118 FAIR PARK BLVD. n204 MYERS, TRACY LANO TEACHER 2221 N. MCKINLEY 72207 663-1068 PARISH, PATRICIA TEACHER 225 KEIGHTLY DRIVE APT B 72207 664-1689 PERSON, PAMELA I TEACHER 5716 RANDOLPH RD n116 758-0887 PHILLIPS, TABITHA L ASST PRINCIPAL ELEMENTA 1615 N. HUGHES 72207 663-6695 RIGGINS, LINDA J AIDE DESEGREGATIOII 8223 SCOTT HAM! L TON 72209 5622357 ROBINSON, ALICE M ACADEMIC SUPPORT WRITING 1403 SOUTH VAN BUREN n204 ROLL! NS, HELEN L SCHOOL NURSE 13400 MEYER n103 455-2819 ROY, LORETTA AIDE DESEGREGATIOII 5005 WEST 21TH STREET n204 666-9487 SCHOEMAKER, EDNA R TEACHER 6612 POPPY DR n209 562-6205 SCOTT, MONICA T AIDE CHAPTER I INSTRUCT 1915 SOUTH IZARD STREET n206 3n3658 SCRUBBS, VERNA M TEACHER P.O BOX 23512 n201 223-4983 SHARP, CONNIE D TEACHER 6115 WEST MARKHAM APT 3A n205 SMITH, BEVERLY A AIDE FOOR YR OLD PROGRA 804 WEST 24TH n206 374-7798 SMITH, LEE M TEACHER 8 TOIJNE COURT #12 n201 224-8913 STAGGERS, ANOREII AIDE DESEGREGATIOII 2600 SOUTH OAK n204 666-7782 THORNTOII, JOSEPHINE aJSTCll lAN  HEAD P.O. BOX 26 no53 490-0944 TRIMBLE, BETTY J aJSTClllAN 2019 WEST 18TH ST n202 375-2990 VINES, GWENDOLYN M AIDE DESEGREGATIOII n206 IIARE, KAREN J TEACHER 423 SOUTH 19TH 71923 246-9649 IIEAVER, FRANCES I lolORKER  ELEM FOCll SERVIC 6009 STAGECOACH ROAD n204 455-1952 Ill NSTOII, JANE A TEACHER 717 LEGATO n205 227-4406 YOUNG, ELIZABETH MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOCll 712 WEST 22ND n114 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY Principal: Mac Huffman 300 Pleasant Valley Dr Little Rock, AR 72212 228-3080 ALEXAIIDER, CAROLYN A ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 7425 FAIRFIELD n209 BAKER, SUSIE TEACHER 2704 CENTER n206 375-9444 BLAINE, BARBARA B COUNSELOR 5 BERGERAC n211 225-3267 BOGA, DIANE lolORKER  ELEM FOCll SERVIC 8820 MIZE ROAD n209 568-6871 BOREN, SYLVIA M MANAGER ELEMENTARY FOCll 10224 JANA DRIVE n209 565-6915 BREWER, GLORIA V AIDE SUPERVISION 4608 PRINCETON n204 6648154 BROADAIIAY, DONNA C LIBRARIAN 51 KINGS ARMS RD n201 225-4180 BURNS, VALERIE J lolORKER  ELEM FOCll SERVIC 1928 WEST 29TH n206 375-6760 COLEMAN, THELMA MEDIA CLERK P.O. BOX 21512 n221 225-8281 COOPER, DOROTHY M TEACHER 10822 BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE n211 225-6928 COURTNEY, JUDITH E TEACHER 3303 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE n201 227-0468 CROCKRAN, GLORIA M ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 3224 SOUTH ARCH n206 375-3342 DEADMON, CAROLYN F aJSTClllAN 1310 ROCK STREET APT A n202 376-4291 DUBOIS, BETTY F lolORKER  ELEM FOCll SERVIC 16501 TAYLOR LOOP ROAD n212 868-5787 FAUSETT, LYNDA M TEACHER 10709 PLATTE VALLEY DRIVE n212 225-8803 FOOTE, CHARLES R TEACHER 3303 ECHO VALLEY DRIVE n201 FREEMAN, BUFUS AIDE SUPERVISION 2520 DORCHESTER DRIVE n204 224-4481 FRITZ, TERRY K AIDE CHAPTER I INSTRUCT 7601 NORTH CHICOT RD APT n209 568-8665 GADDIE, OLIVIA S TEACHER n201 GRAY, PEGGY A TEACHER 2620 CHESTER n206 374-2430 GRINAGE, KIMBERLY L TEACHER 4804 PRINCETON DRIVE n204 664-3249 HALL, CAROLYN L TEACHER 818 ARTHUR DR n204 661-9582 HAMMOND, ~ILEEN A TEACHER P .0. BOX 23862 n221 HARRIS, SHARON R TEACHER #2 PLEASANT FOREST COVE n212 224-0817 HIPP, BRENDA J TEACHER 10620 CRESTDALE LANE n212 224-4117 HONORE 1 SMITH, KAREN P TEACHER 9203 TANYA DRIVE n204 225-3101 HUFFMAN, MAC II ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 219 L!Nlj()(ll) CIRCLE n205 663-0513 HURD, JACKIENEL TEACHER 7417 CHOCTAII ROAD n205 666-7158 JACKSON, MONA RENEE TEACHER 10218 RONALD n205 224-2982 JACOBS, JOAN ELIZABETH AIDE - CHAPTER I INSTRUCT n205 JONES, BEVERLY ASST PRINCIPAL - ELEMENTA 14107 HIGH POINTE DRIVE n211 225-n18 JONES, KAY TEACHER n212 225-0824 KEITH, BARBARA S TEACHER 6909 WEST 34TH n204 562-1502 LOYALL, JULIA F TEACHER PO BOX 6098 n116 835-6810 MILLER, MARGARET L WORKER - ELEM FOOO SERVIC 16504 TAYLOR LOOP ROAD n212 868-5804 PACE, MARTHA V TEACHER 15 MCGOVERN DRIVE n205 227-0285 PARKER, GERALD AIDE - REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 5707 SONORA n209 371-0569 PENN, CARA L TEACHER 63 LAKESIDE DR n204 568-2571 PERRY, LUCIA G SCHOOL NURSE 610 BEVERLY n116 835-5m PITTMAN, CHARLOTTE M AIDE - TITLE VI B INSTRUC 4503 WEST 11TH n204 666-8380 PITTMAN, DEVIN A AIDE - SUPERVISION 4503 WEST 11TH n204 666-8380 PRICE, HARVIN K CUSTOOIAN - HEAD 924 JOHNSON STREET n204 PRUITT, ROBERT AIDE - SUPERVISION 1022 PULASKI n202 375-3528 REDDITT, KAREN L SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL 69 KINGSPARK ROAD n201 225-0890 ROBERTO, LOIS C AIDE - REGULAR Bll\u0026gt;GET 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #71 n201 ROBINSON, BEVERLY K taJNSELOR 9 TALLYHO COURT no76 985-2375 SCARVER, DORIS L CUSTOOIAN - PART TIME 2405 DORCHESTER n204 228-6513 TABOR, GINA L TEACHER 2009 KAVANAUGH APT B n205 THOMPSON, MITZI A TEACHER #23 IIILDWOOO DRIVE no23 USSERY, KAREN L AIDE - SUPERVISION 7601 N CHICOT RD APT 3A n209 568-8665 1/ATSON, THELMA P TEACHER 1509 GEYER STREET n202 375-n86 WESTLAKE, BEVERLY A TEACHER #8 RIDGEi/ELL n120 834-0544 IIILLIANS, IRISH A TEACHER 1601 N. SHACKLEFORD #207- n211 221-3421 IIILSON, ALVIN CUSTOOIAN 4023 LUGIIIG n204 565-3650 IIILSON, JULIA D TEACHER #2 CAMBRIDGE DRIVE no32 329-4239 1/00LLY, CAROL J TEACHER 30 PANELA DRIVE n201 224-5341 1/YATT, JOYCE L REGISTRAR 109 PEBBLE BEACH n212 225-9499 1/YATT, HARIAN G TEACHER 36 TALLYHO LANE n201 225-8776 GARLAND ELEMENTARY Principal: Robert Brown 3615 W. 25th St Little Rock, AR 72204 671-6275 ARNOLD, THEESSA J TEACHER 4308 I/EST 13TH n204 666-1983 ATKINSON, KRISTY LYNN TEACHER 8 OHIO COVE n201 227-7091 BANKS, RICKEY D TEACHER 15 HCM:LL DRIVE n204 221-2946 BEALER, CAROL F ACADEMIC SUPPORT 1/RITING n204 BOSLEY, MICHAEL CUSTOOIAN - HEAD 2919 CENTER STREET n206 371-0343 BROI/N JR, ROBERT L ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 5000 N VINE n116 758-8709 BRUCE, JACQUELYN D ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4913 I/EST 18TH n204 BUCKNER, KENNETH A AIDE - DESEGREGATION n204 CALLAIIAY, ANN II SCHOOL NURSE 120 NORTH WOOOLAND no32 327-4647 CARR, MELANIE TEACHER 1931 HARTIN ST APT. G no32 329-1529 CLAYBORN, CHRYSTAL LANE TEACHER 601 RIDGEIIAY APT C1 n205 663-0170 COLE, BETTY J TEACHER 24623 SIMPSONVILLE LANE n211 821-2281 COLLIER, DELISA Y AIDE - SUPERVISION 3302 SPRING STREET n206 375-7782 COX, MYRENE A MEDIA CLERK 3121 HAZY RIDGE COURT n201 227-0323 DAILEY, NARY E AIDE - DESEGREGATION n204 DANIELS, DOROTHY L AIDE - REGULAR BUDGET 3200 CENTER n206 374-5645 DAVIS, PHILLIP L TEACHER 2205 FOREST CREEK DRIVE n211 221-9016 DAIIICINS, CAROLYN ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 1713 EAST 21ST n202 3n-093o EKWOROHADU, YOLANDA D TEACHER n209 FANSLER, BARBARA I AIDE - DES'EGREGATION 2909 II 25TH n204 664-5289 FELLS, JOSEPH AIDE - SUPERVISION n204 GREEN, MICHAEL B TEACHER P.O. BOX 443 no53 490-1855 GROSS, DEBBIE C TEACHER #3 DEBBIE CIRCLE n209 HALL, GRACIE J TEACHER 1723 S. TAYLOR n204 6666198 HAMPTON, VALDA D AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 3701 LUDWIG n204 5628576 KANOY, ROSIE L AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n164 HARDIN, CASANDRA ANN TEACHER 22 KINGSPARK DRIVE n,13 8510208 HARRIS, BOBBIE C WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC n206 HINES, BEVERLY J TEACHER 2600 HIGH n206 3753197 HOOSE, KEITH L TEACHER 2000 JR DEPUTY ROAD n205 2275106 JESTER, LI NOA TEACHER n210 JONES, CHERYL T COUNSELOR nos OAKRIDGE n116 8353709 JONES, DAVID L IIJLTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY/ED n204 LEWIS, MARGARET A AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 4 PHYLLIS COURT no16 9852836 MCBRIDE, DOROTHY L WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC 1910 S(lJTH JOHNSON n204 6638354 MIRANDA, CARLA J AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 13003 EL ROAD n206 8882873 MOTTIN, MICHELLE S TEACHER 1414 SCOTT STREET n206 NELSON, REBECCA M LIBRARIAN 11006 LEMOIICREST LANE n209 4555544 NORWOOO, FAYE C TEACHER 2205 STATE n206 3744267 RICHARDSON, ANNIE L MEAL TECHNICIAN Foa\u0026gt; SE 4223 WEST 25TH STREET n204 RICKS, SHAWN D TEACHER 1902 CROSS n206 3710225 ROBERTS, KATHLEEN H AIDE DESEGREGATION n205 ROBINSON, MARLENE M TEACHER n205 RODGERS, JUDY C AIDE REGULAR BUDGET n118 RUNION, DIANNE C TEACHER 7117 SHAMROCK DRIVE n205 6632778 RYNDERS, MICHAELE ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 1212 DORTCH LOOP n111 SIMS, SHARON R TEACHER 1601 N SHACKLEFORD BLGD4 n211 2239315  SLATER, LEROY TEACHER P.O. BOX 5785 n215 SMITH, MARY C AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC 201 SPRINGWOOD DR n211 2255936 STANSBERY, ANITA L TEACHER 3524 GUM STREET n218 TAYLOR, MONICA TEACHER 1604 SCOTT APT B n206 3n5338 TROTTER, MARTHA A CUSTODIAN 5000 WEST 29TH n204 WATSON, TONYA AIDE SUPERVISION n204 WILLIAMS, RACHELL SECRETARY PRINCIPAL n120 8358635 WILSON, EDDIE L CUSTODIAN  PART TIME n204 WILSONROBINSON, PERRYLYN ELEMENTARY IV 431 MCCAIN BLVD APT 225N n116 WYATT, JANICE K TEACHER 801 S RODNEY PARHAM #9H n205 2210421 YOUNG, CORAL AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1924 WEST 29TH n206 3753176 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY Principal: Eleanor Cox 5240 Mabelvale Pike Uttle Rock, AR 72209 570-4160 ALLEN, ROSALYN C WORKER ELEM Foa\u0026gt; SERVIC n209 BELL, CLOIS L TEACHER 8711 BOULDER LANE n201 2285327 BOHRA, REBECCA L TEACHER 2912 RESERVOIR n209 2212992 BOX 111, DAVID H AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION 6401 SHIRLEY DRIVE n204 6636492 BRIGHT, GLADIS CUSTODIAN 39 REGINA CIRCLE n209 5687328 BROWN, THISSIE L AIDE SUPERVISION 2124 LABETTE MANOR DR APT n205 2248089 COOPER, JUANITA AIDE SUPERVISION 2116 SINGLETON COURT n204 COUNTS, CARLA M AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 6310 ASHER AVENUE #619 n204 5689471 COX, ELEANOR V ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 9219 TIMBER VALLEY ROAD n204 5681106 CRAIG, DEBORAH L TEACHER 11901 PLEASANTREE DRIVE n211 225-n14 CROFT, BRENDA M TEACHER 2409 BLACKWOOO ROAD n201 6643378 DOUGLAS, PATSY G TEACHER 9303 TANYA ORIVE n204 DUMAS, JOSEPHINE TEACHER 1830 SCHILLER STREET n202 3744200 FARLEY, KATHEY D LIBRARIAN 935 HOGAN LANE no32 3271765 FELDER, ARTHUR L AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 6116 ARBOR COVE APT 3 n209 5623931 GILBERT, JEAN H TEACHER 6311 SHERRY DRIVE n204 GINGERICH, TAMARA L TEACHER 5514 DEVONSHIRE COURT n209 5626852 GWIN, LISA IC TEACHER 1210 KELLOGG ROAD n120 834-4218 HARTMAN, ICR I STI MAREE TEACHER 3022 WARE STREET n204 568-9934 HAYMAN, KIMBERLY 8 SCHOOL NURSE n209 HIGHTOWER, NITA J TEACHER 7'900 WEST 25TH n204 224-1765 HILL, OOLORES J TEACHER 5201 PRIMROSE n209 565-5616 JONES, MILOREO 8 TEACHER 1617 SOUTH CLEVELAND n204 663-5855 KYZER, ADAM MANAGER  ELEMENTARY FOOO 7825 HOMESTEAD DRIVE n103 888-5046 LANEHART, FRANS MEDIA CLERIC 2700 MONTREAL n204 225-5981 LEE, SANORA L TEACHER P.O. BOX 2 n061 679-4710 MIDDLEBROOICS, MICHELLE R TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PARIC\\IAY APT n211 225-2663 MILLER, PATTY R TEACHER 501 NAPA VALLEY #706 n211 223-2937 MOORE, LORETTA AIDE SUPERVISION n209 568-8139 PARKER, LI NOA F CaJNSELOR 15017 WEST BASELINE ROAD n209 PEEK, PEGGY R TEACHER 1607 MOUNTAIN DRIVE n201 223-8533 PETERSON, DOROTHY T TEACHER 2124 LABETTE MANOR OR #S n205 PHILLIPS, ESSIE M AIDE REGULAR BUDGET 1918 BRAGG n206 3769350 PRICE, CINDY C TEACHER n205 664-5911 REED, ALFREDA M CUSTODIAN 6600 LANCASTER, APT 57 n209 562-8506 REESE, JONELL WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 12410 HILARO SPRINGS ROAD n206 565-m9 ROSSY, IC I MBERL Y SECRETARY PRINCIPAL n209 565-2036 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 6200 ASHER AVE APT #176 72204 STUBBLEFIELD, E\\IELYN D TEACHER 2124 LABETTE F-21 72205 227-7261 WILBARGER, TOMMIE AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 3624 WALKER n204 565-2673 GIBBS MAGNET Principal: Donna Davis 1115 W.16th St Little Rock, AR 72202 324-2490 ARMSTONG, DOROTHY W AIDE SUPERVISION 3111 IZARD 72206 372-1158 BARBEE, BOBBIE J AIDE REGULAR BU\u0026gt;GET 1712 WOODROW n204 664-4124 BLOME, CAROLYN H TEACHER 27 PAMELA DRIVE 72207 227-5276 BONTON, JOVONOA D CUSTODIAN 5520 MARTIII 72206 897-4517 BRYANT, JUDYE COUNSELOR 415 TURKEY CREEK ROAD n132 DAVIS, DONNA J ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 609 NORTH BRYAN 72205 666-1271 FIELDS, LEOLA H ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE P.O. BOX 190901 72219 562-2756 FOSTER, NANCY TEACHER 52 TALLYHO LANE n201 227-7181 GIVENS, LINDA AIDE SUPERVISION 72204 GONTERMAN, VICIC! L TEACHER P.O. BOX 502 72002 847-3485 GRAYSON, KAYREN G TEACHER 7822 BRIARWOOD CIRCLE n205 225-1557 GUINN, HUBERT F TEACHER 13 LAKESIDE DRIVE 72204 562-0382 HAMILTON, NANCY P TEACHER 6 ROANE CIRCLE 72204 663-7657 HERNDON, SHARON R SECRETARY PRINCIPAL 9011 HERNDON ROAD n204 562-8496 HOLMES, MARGARET C TEACHER 2921 YOUNGWOOO 72212 663-1498 HURO, ANN J TEACHER 9224 DUKE OR 72204 225-5677 JONES, MARY R TEACHER 3210 WEST 16TH 72204 KEOWN, ADA L TEACHER 10513 DIAMOND DRIVE 72209 562-4162 KIMBALL, BEATRIZ M TEACHER 128 GLEN DRIVE nzo1 664-0285 KITCHEN, CLARA M CUSTODIAN 6105 BATTLE ROAD 72209 568-8715 LAVEY, CATHERINE L LIBRARIAN 501 N BRYAN 72205 666-5on LEWELLEN, WILHELMINA E TEACHER 1922 WOLFE n202 3n5612 LUZZI, PATRICIA C TEACHER 9 BERGERAC LANE n211 221-1189 MCCUIEN, ANGIE G WORKER ELEM FOOO SERVIC 2306 WEST 18TH 72204 376-0011 MITCHELL, NANCY 8 TEACHER 105 HEATHERBRAE CaJRT 72116 835-0287 NEWSOME, PAMELA F TEACHER 2208 SOUTH MONROE 72204 O'NEAL, EARNEST L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 4920 AUGUSTA CIRCLE APT G n118 PERRY, LUCIA G SCHOOL NURSE 610 BEVERLY n116 835-5m PURVIS, SUSAN T TEACHER 3001 OZARK STREET n205 663-9242 RAMIREZ, MARIA lJRKER  ELEJI FOOO SERVIC 821 JEFFERSON 72204 3724474 RAYFORD, ESSIE R NANAGER  ELEMENTARY FOOO 4712 GRAND 72204 6668387 ROBINSON, SUSIE A TEACHER 1605 WINBOURNE DRIVE 72116 7711678 SHUFELBERGER, CAROLE TEACHER 505A MIMI 72211 2289156 SHUMATE, CARL E CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 2522 RINGO 72206 372-4647 SINGER, PATRICIA K TEACHER 8101 CANTRELL ROAD #1205 72207 22387'94 TALLEY, SHIRLEY A TEACHER 17 BEAUREGARD 72206 490-0961 TARKINGTON, SUSAN D TEACHER 5 BELMONT DRIVE 72204 5684517 TAULBEE, CARYN L TEACHER 13000 MORRISON ROAD 72212 2247252 THRASHER, EUNICE M TEACHER 2000 DENNISON 72206 374-0528 WALTERS, ALICE H TEACHER 2706 ECHO VALLEY 72207 2234997 WHITESELL, JEANNE S TEACHER 7800 WEST 25TH 72204 2258503 WILBAIIKS, SANDRA L MEDIA CLERK 9 LAVER CIRCLE 72209 455-3318 WILLIAMS, DONALD W TEACHER 216 WEST 20TH STREET 72206 375.0937 WILSON, ELIZABETH A TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PK\\IY APT 850 72076 2234965 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Principal: Dr. Victor Anderson 6700 H St Uttle Rock, AR 72205 671-6200 ALLEN, CLARENCE TEACHER 1124 PEYTON 72204 753-3132 ALLEN, DONALD CARL SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 9314 TIMBER VALLEY RD 72204 565-4982 ALLGOOO, EMMA J AIDE  REGULAR BUDGET 4301 MARYLAND ST. 72204 661-9052 ANDERSON 111, VICTOR SECONOARY PRINCIPAL PO BOX 3353 72203 8216263 ANDERSON, DIANE TONEY lJRKER  ELEM FOOO SERVIC 4504 WEST 2nH 72204 6645514 ANDERSON, NARY L lJRKER  SR HIGH FOOO SER 4119 TATUM STREET 72204 565-3468 ANDERSON, PHILLIS L TEACHER 72207 ARTHURS, JANE G TEACHER #11 FOXHUNT TRAIL 72207 224-4388 BAKER, CARLA S lJRKER  SR HIGH FOOO SER 1304 MARLYN DRIVE 72205 223-9844 BANKS, WANDA F SECRETARY GUIDANCE 14 DARTM\u0026lt;l.lTH DRIVE 72204 224-2071 BENTLEY, PAMELA B TEACHER 1000 N MELLON 72207 661-1369 BISBEE, CHERYL A lJRKER  SR HIGH FOOO SER 16509 TAYLOR LOOP RD 72212 BLAKELY, TERESA K TEACHER 220 NORTH TYLER 72205 666-7181 BONA, PATRICIA C TEACHER 315 N. MISSISSIPPI 72205 6641432 BRANT, DENNIS R TEACHER 3525 LAKEVIEW ROAD 72116 753-9190 BRATTON, DONALD E TEACHER 9724 SATTERFIELD 72205 225-5461 BREWER, ROSEMARY M TEACHER #4 HAYFIELD DRIVE 72207 225-9661 BREWSTER, MARILYN J ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 44 KINGS PARK 72207 224-4099 BROOKS, ENANUAL TEACHER 4322 ZION STREET 72204 568-0734 BURTON, MARVIN L TEACHER 1505 S. CLEVELAND 72204 280-0817 BYNUM, LARRY D BUILDING ENGINEER 106 ESSEX COURT 72076 9825628 CARPENTER, CHARLENE D COUNSELOR 8705 LABETTE DRIVE 72204 225-9622 CHATMAN, DENNIS R CUSTOOIAN 1401 BR~ STREET 72204 CIRKS, GEORGE E TEACHER 6900 SHAMROCK 72205 664-6418 COCHRAN, BRYANT J TEACHER 1106 RONWOOO DR 72207 2270105 COLLINS, JlllYTHE L TEACHER 31 WHITE OAlC DRIVE 72032 327-8610 CRAIG, SHERRY A TEACHER 14601 RIDGEWOOO DRIVE 72211 2238582 CYR, BETTY M REGISTRAR 7185 MILL ROAD 72103 8885052 DACE, SAM H COONSELOR 49 DACE PLACE 72032 3271011 DANIELL, JAMES T TEACHER #9 BETSY LANE 72205 246-8684 DAVIS, FAITH E TEACHER 13500 CHENAL PK\\IY #810C 72211 224-5789 DIETZ, ICAY M TEACHER 8714 BOULDER LANE 72207 2255585 DUNAHUE, OTIS C CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 4217 WEST 18TH 72204 6645396 DYER, LENORA A TEACHER 2 INDIAN TRAIL 72207 225-6274 EASTER, ELIZABETH L TEACHER 5323 OPAL DRIVE 72076 988-9714 FLETCHER, SEAN M TEACHER 801 SOUTH ROONEY PARHAM # 72205 223-4741 GAGE, NARY J TEACHER 16 BUGLE COURT 72207 225-4998 GREEN, CHRISTINE TEACHER P.O. BOX 46363 n204 2250655 GROCE, VIRGINIA A TEACHER 14 BREEDS HILL COURT n211 2254123 GUNTER, AMELDA K SECRETARY PRINCIPAL #9 POINTE CLEAR DRIVE n212 2259760 HASBERRY, ELNAR TEACHER 5319 SOUTHBORO DRIVE n209 5653255 HOLDEN JR, WILLIES ACTING ASSISTANT HEAD CUS 1622 HANGER n202 3n7085 HOPE, BARBARA W BOOKKEEPER 2201 IIEST ROAD n201 6669101 HUMPHREY, VERNITA T TEACHER 2115 SOUTH ARCH n206 3753345 JAMES, GENEVA C WORKER SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SER 2623 BROADIIAY COURT n206 JARMON, MYRA M TEACHER 1705 MISSOUR 71601 5341174 JAY, CHARLENE V MANAGER SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SE 5424 JONES LOOP ROAD n211 821-2438 JOHNSON, BARBARA WORKER SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SER 1304 SOUTH TAYLOR n204 666-0237 JOHNSON, BETTIE CUSTOOIAN 2916 SPRING n206 JOHNSON, ELOYCE CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 2211 SPINE ST n204 375-5948 JOHNSON, JIJ\u0026gt;ITH K AIDE REGULAR BIJ\u0026gt;GET 7011 HILLl,IOOO ROAD n201 666-8179 JOHNSON, WONDRUE M TEACHER 1404 IIEST 18TH n206 JONES, LI NOA S TEACHER 30824 BANDY ROAD n211 821-4902 KELLEYBREW, CAROL M l\u0026gt;RKER  SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SER ROUTE 1 BOX 317 n142 961-9111 KING, SUSAN L TEACHER 2305 CARY DRIVE no15 n8-0697 LANGFORD, CLIFFORD H TEACHER 6905 FLINTROCK n116 834-2888 LASKER, ALBERTA TEACHER #4 LASKER LANE no32 470-1147 MADDISON, SUE TEACHER 6503 CANTRELL ROAD n201 666-1127 MALONE, HOSEA D TEACHER 420 EAST ARNOLD STREET 71857 753-1243 MANTELS, ALITA I TEACHER 1601 N BRYANT SUITE 10 n201 661-1604 MATHIS, BARBARA S TEACHER 1556 SKYLINE DRIVE n116 7535254 MCDONALD, BENNY D SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF n111 MCDONALD, TINA l\u0026gt;RKER  SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SER RWTE 1 BOX 246A no16 333-2482 MCGEE, EARNEST E TEACHER 18519 FAWN TREE n209 455-1536 MCKINNON, LONA G TEACHER 7 l,IOOOLORE COURT n211 225-1998 MEADOWS, MARY JANES TEACHER 12514 COLLEEN DRIVE n212 221-3001 MILLER, BRUCE W TEACHER 5715 C STREET n205 664-6707 MOSELEY, CHARLES F TEACHER 8 NEWSTEAD n209 565-7904 NELSON, TRACEY A SECRETARY  ATTENDANCE n204 NIEDERBRACH, TINA F TEACHER 7312 \"H\" STREET n205 280-9712 NORDMAN, ANTJE H TEACHER 712 NORTH TAYLOR STREET n205 666-0671 NORMAN, BOBBIE J TEACHER 4 H~LL DRIVE n204 225-0852 NORMAN, LEOLA P TEACHER 1102 S ARTHUR DR n204 664-1304 NORTON, MICHAEL TEACHER 11n1 ASHl,IOOO DR n211 227-8013 OWINGS, SHEFFIELD L TEACHER 4 BROADVIEW TERRACE n201 664-2796 PHIPPS, FLORENE J TEACHER 121 NORTH DRIVE no32 470-3333 PORTER, LINDA M COUNSELOR 10702 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE n212 224-4942 POWELL, JAMES E ASST PRINCIPAL  SECONDAR 3 KARON CT n205 225-1086 ROBERTSON, AIJ\u0026gt;RON S LIBRARIAN 3224 SUMMIT CT n201 225-6173 ROOGERS, ANDREW E ACTING HEAD CUSTOOIAN 3411 PINE CONE DRIVE n209 568-9218 ROGERS, VIVIAN A l\u0026gt;RKER  SR HIGH Foa\u0026gt; SER 2912 S. HARRISON n204 376-0051 RUNSHANG, MARYE TEACHER 4907 HAWTHORNE n201 666-2150 SANDERS, MARY K TEACHER 6921 AMHERST n205 664-5844 SCHARFF, REBECCA Q TEACHER 18 WHITE ASPEN COURT n212 225-4558 SHORT, DEBORAH W TEACHER 8523 LEATRICE n201 224-9160 SMITH, THOMAS P TEACHER 322 N PINE n205 661-9176 STUCKEY, BRENDA J TEACHER 9705 BROOKS COURT n205 224-6144 TERRY, ANGELA Y TEACHER 301 KINGS ROW DRIVE #309 n201 280-9415 TRICE, JIJ\u0026gt;Y M TEACHER 181 PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE n212 225-7365 TURNER, DOROTHY J CUSTOOIAN  PART TIME 817 CARSON STREET n202 376-8407 VALDEZ, MELINDA M TEACHER 2603 STEPHANIE DRIVE n206 888-1301 WADE, ROY L TEACHER 6809 INCAS n116 834-7126 WALTON, GEORGIA C TEACHER 3316 W 16TH n204 6667524 WARREN, SUZANNE N MEDIA CLERK #20 IIESTCHESTER CWRT n212 868-4532 WASHINGTON, JAMES L ASST PRINCIPAL  SECONDAR 14404 l,IOOOCREEK n211 225-2432 WATSON, GLADYSTINE TEACHER 416 IIEST 25TH n114 753-8640 WATSON, MARYLEE R TEACHER 1n4 FAIR PARK BLVD n204 664-2447 WILEY, SHIRLEY CJSTOOIAN  PART TIME 10307 INDEPENDENCE LANE n209 663-8157 WILLINGHAM, ELIZABETH TEACHER 510 ARTHUR DRIVE n204 663-3009 WILSON, RICHARD L ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 215 DRYAD LANE n2os 227-4891 WOOO, PAULA IC TEACHER 30D7 ALAMEDA DRIVE n204 562-9445 WRIGHT, ELIZABETH A TEACHER 506 HALL DRIVE n2os 663-5878 YATES, MARY P TEACHER 319 BEECHWOOO n2os 663-1694 YEATMAN, JANICE R SCHOOL NURSE 20 ICIIIGSPARIC ROAD n201 22549n ZINK, Jll)Y R TEACHER 1 SONATA TRAIL n2os 225-1704 HENDERSON JR. HIGH Prlnclpal: Clell Watts 401 Barrow Rd Uttle Rock, AR 72205 228-3050 AYRES, KATHRYN A TEACHER 7005 GRACE ROAD n209 562-6168 BAKER, FRAIIIC TEACHER 1601 11. SHACKLEFORD #105 72212 BATES, MICKEY L TEACHER 11824 SHAIINEE FOREST DR 72212 BATSON, NENA I TEACHER 10 1/ESTWOOO LIi n204 565-5905 BEAVERS, EMMA J COONSELOR 6410 SHIRLEY DR n204 666-2300 BISBEE, KATHLEEN MANAGER JR HIGH FOOD SE 715 OSAGE DRIVE n132 397-7027 BOLTON, JOYCE M CJSTOOIAII 2323 BRM n204 663-2881 BRADLEY, ROZALYII M TEACHER 10613 BRAZOS VALLEY DRIVE n212 227-5536 BROADNAX, WILLIAM E ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR P.O. BOX 505 n203 663-7579 BROOICS, WILLIAM H TEACHER n202 BUCK, LAWRENCE J TEACHER 7808 LASSIE LANE n204 BURICEPILE, WILLIAM L TEACHER 1612 MARLYN DRIVE n205 BURNETT, NANCY E TEACHER 10 PINTO POINT n211 227-9464 BURTON, KAYE L MEDIA CLERIC 1501 SHUMATE n212 227-4639 CAROLINA, DANICA SECRETARY - ATTENDANCE #16 MANSFIELD DRIVE n209 COLEMAN, NANCY IC COUNSELOR 1812 OLD FORGE DR n201 225-6483 COLLIER, CLEOPHIS TEACHER 1903 SOOTH GRANT n204 664-0255 DAUGHERTY, SHERRY E AIDE  TITLE VI B INSTRUC 2101 SOOTH MARTIN n204 DEPRIEST, PATRICIA S COONSELOR 10 GOLDEN OAK COVE n212 DERRINGTON, LOIS M LIBRARIAN 1002 N SHACKLEFORD RD n211 225-9082 DICKINSON, PATRICIA D TEACHER 7117 NEAL CREEK ROAD n211 868-4112 DIXON, PAMELA B TEACHER 604 NORTH OAK n205 666-3802 FISHER, RICHARD H TEACHER ROUTE 8 BOX 795 n104 337-1292 FLETCHER, VICKI M TEACHER 21 WINDY OAKS COORTS n205 FRENCH, MARY TEACHER 6600 EAST SARDIS ROAD n065 888-8653 GERARD, NELLIE C TEACHER 2415 CROSS n206 376-2576 GILLIAM, CANDY WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 2812 GAINES STREET n206 376-6205 GRANT, JAMES T TEACHER 820 TEAL DRIVE no32 327-3530 GUEST, JULIA M TEACHER 14219 COONTY FARM ROAD n212 GUPPY, GEORGIA T TEACHER n116 HENDERSON, BETSY D TEACHER 1010 S ARTHUR DR n204 HENSON, KATHYE TEACHER P.O. BOX 24626 n22i 227-7365 HINTON, TANGIE L AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION 205 I/EST 4nH STREET n118 835-8455 HIVELY, LYNNE M. TEACHER 4710 SAM PECK ROAD #1042 n212 227-6338 HOLCCJ4B, KIM L TEACHER P.O. BOX 432 no33 327-3783 HUFF, THELMA L WORKER  JR HIGH FOOD SER 15 MANSFIELD DRIVE n209 568-9412 JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER AIDE  TITLE VI B IIISTRUC 5408 VALLEY DRIVE n209 568-3723 JAC08S, MARY V TEACHER 2101 RCJ41NE ROAD n205 JAMES, Rll\u0026gt;OLPH E AIDE  TITLE VI B INSTRUC 13111 MARKHAM ST APT 51 n211 221-0135 JOHNSON, CHARLIE TEACHER 2906 DORSET n204 225-9274 JONES, KAREN IC TEACHER 2035 ICING CIRCLE no32 326-0162 JONES, LEON CJSTOOIAII 2715 CROSS n206 376-3551 KELLEY, MARILYN G TEACHER 15 INVERNESS CIRCLE n212 KELLY, TERETHA E TEACHER #3 UT I CA LANE n204 223-2295 KING, DEBORAH A LEWIS, LClJIE LOW, MYRREL L LOWE, DEBRA W MANN, TRAVIS D MAPLE, CATHERINE P MARBLE, JOY Z MAXWELL, AZZIE L MAYERNICK, DIANE C MCCARRELL, ETHELENE R MCGINNIS, SHELLEY RENE MILLER, SUSAN P MITCHELL, JOYCE A MOOREHEAD, KENNITH D MORRIS, LINDA A NADLER, CAROL J PICADO, ELENA PIGGEE, CELESTINE PITTS, GAIL G PORCHIA, EDGAR A PRICE, JAMES M RAGLAND, ANGELA D RAINS, MARTHA K ROBERTS, VICKIE R ROGERS, SHERRY LYNN SCOTT, ORA J SHIELDS, MOLLY T SHORTER, LARRY D SKOTKO, FRANCINE S SLATER, CAROLYN A SLATER, WILLIE SMITH, SHAROL K STIEDLE, JOYCE A STOWERS, WANDA S SWANIGAN, BELINDA D TAYLOR, CLAYTON L THOMPSON, TRACEY L TURNER, RUTHY M VALBRACHT, CAROL J VANECKO, ANDREW P VOEGELE, THOMAS H WALKERWHEELER, LISA T WALLACE, ROBERT WATTS, CLELL WHITE, TONI D WILLIAMS, CYNTHIA H WILLIAMS, EKLON C WILLIAMS, GARY D WILLIAMS, ROGER N WILLIAMS, VELMA J WILSON, RICHARD L BOOKKEEPER TEACHER SECRETARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER REGISTRAR WORKER  JR HIGH FOOO SER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER AIDE TITLE VI B INSTRUC TEACHER CUSTODIAN TEACHER CUSTODIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER WORKER JR HIGH FOOO SER TEACHER TEACHER CUSTODIAN TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER BUILDING ENGINEER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE TEACHER SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR TEACHER ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 13420 David o. Dodd Rd Little Rock, AR 72210 228-3100 BAILEY, MILTON TEACHER 5 BLACKJACK CClJRT 3302 LEHIGH DRIVE 7001 AMHERST DRIVE 1420 BRECKENRIDGE APT 125 215 NORTH ASH 417 DEL RIO 515 SHAMROCK DRIVE 3708 LUDWIG 1805 WATT 11201 HICKORY HILL ROAD 322 FAIRFAX 6718 KAVANAU~H PLACE 307 WEST 19TH #10 CHARLIE W. ROAD 288 JACKSON 312 3 FAIRBROOK 6804 BURTON DRIVE 8509 LABETTE DRIVE 13609 WOOOBROOK 4304 AREHART DRIVE RT 1 BOX 236 1960 ERBACH 5415 SULLIVAN ROAD 10107 PALO ALTO DR. 12904 PLEASANT FOREST P.O.BOX 164081 12 VICTORIA CIRCLE 4023 LUDWIG 4 CAMBAY CClJRT 8405 LABETTE DR 9615 CERELLE 6307 SHERRY' DRIVE 1615 E TWIN LAKES DR 33 ROBINWOOO DR 1869 IZARD STREET #5 KATHY CIRCLE 1601 N SHACKLEFORD #403 2501 W 16TH 2208 E CLELAND 6 MALCOLM 1069 DONAGHEY 2314 IZARD STREET PO BOX 2121 3701 DORAL STREET 14620 WILKS LANE 10112 HIGHWAY 365 SClJTH 2601 SClJTH OAK 5704 E. ROOSEVELT 2507 GlJNPOl.l)ER 816 SKYLINE DRIVE 215 DRYAD LANE Principal: Al Niven 103 ALIZA DRIVE n204 n204 n205 n201 n2os n205 n2os n204 72207 72211 n205 n201 n114 no32 no20 n2os n204 n204 n211 n209 no16 no32 n210 n209 n212 n216 n113 n204 n211 n204 n205 n204 n205 n201 n206 no32 n211 n202 no23 n209 no32 n206 n203 n212 n113 n206 n204 n206 n201 n116 n205 n209 2251850 6649469 2244249 6610302 6641122 5656469 2256627 2217110 663-no1 7714975 3298451 3448266 2274786 2238903 3302570 3298766 8212658 5654954 3757763 8516169 2232197 2258499 2258642 6666348 2256292 2256344 3761353 3369544 375.7393 9881522 329-7680 2250781 2274513 8512387 2255557 7587962 2274891 4555857 BARNHILL, SAMMIE J TEACHER 959 WATKINS no32 BARNHOUSE, CAROL TEACHER 1912 GUNPOl.l)ER n207 225-4325 BATES, BETTY S REGISTRAR RClJTE 3 BOX 94 n086 676-3449 BENNETT, TANNY W TEACHER 11710 PLEASANT RIDGE #131 n212 BRYANT, DELOIS CClJNSELOR 801 CANTRELL APT 403 n201 2219176 BURR, BETTY R ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 9 EVERT COORT n209 4550286 BURT, GERALDINE H WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER #4 WHITMORE CIRCLE n206 3757619 CALLAWAY, EVELYN J TEACHER 2802 ROMINE ROAD n204 2247816 CASTEEL, JOANN LIBRARIAN 10725 BRECKENRIDGE 72211 2254103 CHRISTENSEN, ROSEN TEACHER 2308 PEACHTREE DRIVE 72211 6665420 CLEVELANO, KINNIE R TEACHER 521 TREY LANE 72032 3272325 COOPER, JAMES L TEACHER 4206 LORANCE DRIVE 72206 8882211 COX, CATHY J TEACHER 6716 ROCIC\\IOOO ROAD 72207 DAVIS, MARIE SCHOOL NURSE 901 SOUTH JEFFERSON ST. 72204 6639063 DEDNAII JR, JOHN L ASST PRINCIPAL SECONDAR 41 CREPE MYRTLE 72209 455-4266 DELAMAR, CLYDE L TEACHER 1420 BRECKENRIDGE #75 72207 ENDERLIN, EVELYN H TEACHER 3111 PAINTED VALLEY DRIVE 72212 2256159 ESKOLA, GLEN E TEACHER 1912 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR #3 72212 2279640 FARNER, RITA D MANAGER  SR HIGH FOOD SE 3211 WALKER 72204 224-1142 FARRAR, ELIZABETH J TEACHER 3714 OAIC\\IOOO ROAD n205 663-9628 FINCH, ALICIA I TEACHER 9 DEE DEE CIRCLE 72212 868-5356 FISHER, JONATHAN CUSTOOIAN  HEAD 46 WHITMORE 72206 374-4400 FLINN, TIMOTHY P TEACHER 811 NORTH GRANT #8 72205 6648832 FRIES, NICOLE N TEACHER 609 PENBROICE 72116 835-0484 GLASSCO, BELi NOA B TEACHER 6301 CAMP ROBINSON RD #25 72118 753-9041 GRAHAN, I.AURA A TEACHER 9816 REGENT CIRCLE 72204 GRAY, VICKIE IC TEACHER 4014 POTTER 72204 5654581 GRUNNER, WILLIAN J TEACHER #1 ROSEWOOO 72032 327-1177 HALL, LINDA L TEACHER 1316 ALABAMA 71601 536-1931 HARDIN, JIJ\u0026gt;ITH IC SECRETARY GUIDANCE 1912 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR A 72212 2232965 HARRISON, T.F KENNETH TEACHER 1 SHADY VALLEY CClJRT 72116 7531461 HART, JIJ\u0026gt;ITH N CClJNSELOR 700 EAST 9TH #7C 72202 HARTNESS, PAUL J TEACHER 919 CClJLTER 72116 835-6936 HIETT, RUTHIE R TEACHER 9 LI SA CClJRT 72212 2241041 HOBBS, PANELA A TEACHER 2 CANYON CClJRT n116 7586141 HORNE, LISA IC SCHOOL BASED SECURITY OFF 503 EAST 6TH STREET APT 2 72202 376-1944 H~D, NANCY L SECRETARY PRINCIPAL #3 HOGAN DRIVE 72209 565-4832 HULLUM, BRENDA S TEACHER 1923 NICHOLS n205 2258335 INNAN, ANN C TEACHER 2300 REBSAMEN #8205 72202 6662848 JACKSON, CYNTHIA D TEACHER 1104 EAST 19TH 71601 5358671 JACKSON, HERNAN L CUSTOOIAN  PART TINE 5921 VALLEY DRIVE #7 72209 5683723 JENKINS, PATRICIA R ACADEMIC SUPPORT LAB ATTE 5411 WEST 13TH 71603 562-667'9 JOHNSON, JON N TEACHER 1221 RESERVOIR ROAD #161 72207 221-1204 JONES, ARLIN E TEACHER 14814 SARA LYNN DR n206 888-4069 JONES, HAROLD WORKER SR HIGH FOOD SER 2306 TYLER STREET n204 6634410 JONES, JUANITA B TEACHER 7800 HILLSBORO ROAD 72103 568-4841 JONES, MARGARET J\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1135","title":"Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1135"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nExhibit 310A\nphotocopies\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS 1994-1995 1 of 2 IN-DEPTH PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description: Facilities service includes resources to identify, plan and execute maintenance/repair programs equitably so that Little Rock School District students can receive efficient, functional and effective education. Specifically, facilities includes maintenance programs to maintain/repair all District facilities in an equitable condition commensurate with financial resources and District priorities. Purpose: The purpose operation's necessary to critical as management. of the Facilities Program is part of the base costs to maintain the buildings and grounds support the educational mission. This program is it encompasses all aspects of real property Scope and Content: The Facilities Program encompasses the repair of all existing facilities, grounds and other real property, the maintenance thereof, new construction to support academic initiatives, all real estate actions to include leases, purchasing of property, selling of property, easements, grants, rights-of-way and licenses. It is extenqed to include the base operation costs of utility payments covering electric, water, gas, refuse, entomology and any other miscellaneous services. It includes long-range planning, responsibilities with regard to new construction, maintenance, acquisition and closing of facilities. Participants/Beneficiaries: The Facilities Program is a base operations program that supports all persons that work for the Little Rock School District, are educated by its programs, or visit its facilities. Program Goals: To equitably maintain and repair facilities to support academic programs, student enrollment and administrative support, the Little Rock School District is committed to insure for all students equitable educational facilities and schools which are located in lower socio-economic areas shall receive attention and resources at least equal to those in more affluent areas in the District. 1 Evaluation Criteria: The evaluation criteria for the objectives listed in the Facilities Program consists principally of historical records indicating requests and completions of maintenance and repair work. The evaluation criteria is geared .specifically to the objectives as outlined in the Desegregation Plan, Court Orders and OD~ Reports. They do not require a relative measure of success, but merely to report numbers of requests made and completions and the percent thereof. Evaluation Results: There is no measurable scale of success against which the evaluation can be made. The objectives reported in the Facilities Program Budget Document, as stated previously, merely report the percent of completion of requests made of the Facilities Program. There is no set goal that can be equated to measure this quantity. The amount of work completed has too many variables to establish a set percent to be achieved in any given reporting period. This is due to the complexity of the requests, the nature of the requests, the total number and the resources allocated to complete that goal, coupled with the priority. Objective #1: To maintain all school facilities such that they are in a safe, operational condition, and to repair, as necessary, commensurate with resources. Discussion fl: The overall level of success indicates that we have met our objective on all reporting periods. It is to be reasonably expected that the percent completed of the items listed under \"Strategies\" will vary commensurate with the amount of work and the resources allocated these initiatives. Since there is no measure of success or pre-determined percent which must be completed, one can only assume that all work that could reasonably be accomplished during the reporting period was done so, and all uncompleted work will carry forth to the next reporting period. Objective #2: The capacities of junior high schools will be reviewed in light of needed programs. Such capacities will then be revised as necessary. Discussion #2: This objective was met in 1993 and later evaluated in 1994. It will be recommended that this objective be deleted from the Program Budget Document. Objective #3: Concrete walks and macadam drives will be in good repair. Discussion #3: This is a subjective evaluation. The numbers of requests made, and the numbers completed, are what is reported. It is not possible to establish a desired level of completion because the work is received at various times during the reporting period such that the complexities of scheduling and allocated resources will vary the completion rate. Objective #4: New public address systems and bell systems will be placed in buildings where such items are not repairable. Discussion #4: Almost eighty percent (80%) of the requests made during the last reporting period have been completed. This is a program, like others, which is ongoing and which will be funded commensurate with approved funding levels. Objective #5: Any school which has portable buildings will have these buildings replaced with new units or repaired so that they will be in a condition suitable for use. Discussion #5: Sixty-two percent ( 62%) of the work requested of the Directorate was completed during the last reporting period. Objective #6: All school construction shall be subject to the Court's prior approval and shall promote desegregation. New construction must be approved by the Court. l l Discussion #6: This is an ongoing strategy. There are no requirements pending at this time. There is no need for further evaluation of this objective. Objective #7: Modify building space to increase library capacities at Mitchell and Garland, purge the shelves of outdated, well-worn materials at Mitchell. Books most frequently used by the Four-Year Old Program, Kindergarten, and First Grades could be permanently placed in the individual classrooms since those grades are all housed in structures that are detached from the main building. Discussion #7: The portion of this objective allocated to the Facilities Program was completed in 1992. Objective #8: Franklin: Repair or replace the roof on each level of the building. Replace all ceiling tiles damaged by water leaks. Repaint interior walls as needed. Discussion #8: Most of these repairs have been completed. The ones that have been requested have been attended to. This building is scheduled for painting during School Year '94 - '95. Objective #9: Garland: Determine the feasibility of adding bathrooms on the second floor of the building. Increase the size of the Media Center and relocating the building's main entrance. Discussion #9: This assessment and report was completed and filed in 1992. No further evaluation is needed. Objective #10: Ish: Professionally evaluate the structural condition of the building and correct the many problems caused by the leaking roof. May be necessary to add a new slope roof. Unsightly classroom bathrooms would be repaired at once by those qualified to deal with asbestos. Exterior lighting should be repaired or replaced and the building's trim painted. once the roof no longer leaks, the entire interior should be repainted. Discussion #10: This objective was completed and reported in October of 1992. Objective #11: Mitchell: Correct the drainage problems and then replace the water-damaged carpeting in the GT room. Address the shortage of Media Center space, possibly by adding bookshelves to the second floor hallway near the Librarian's Office which is located in a kiosk area. Also consider adding more shelves to create storage space within existing Media Center. Discussion #11: This requirement requires no further evaluation. It was completed in 1992. Objective #12: Rightsell: Eliminate the moisture problem at the school. Professionals with restoration experience involved to help solve problems of the final Playground should receive major improvements additional age appropriate equipment. Discussion #12: should be building. including This objective does not require further evaluation since it has not been completed. Objective #13: Rockefeller: Install a new heating and cooling system if the effectiveness of the present system is not corrected by the recently-replaced room thermostats. Discussion #13: This assessment was made and the correction was completed in 1992. Objective #14: Stephens: Stephens' objective is to be deleted since the school has been demolished. l Discussion #14: NIA Objective #15: _,. ... ,, All seven (7) incentive schools would benefit aesthetically from the addition of attractive landscaping. Once plantings are installed, the custodial staff should be trained in proper plant care. Many Little Rock School District schools have lost mature plantings to improper and over-zealous pruning by District wo:tkers, or from under-watering in times of summer heat and drought. Discussion #\n15: This is an ongoing problem. Guidance has been given the facilities. It will continue to be monitored. There is no level of success against which this objective can be measured. Objective #16: Give the incentive schools priority in the District sequencing of capital improvement projects since doublefunding does not cover capital improvements and maintenance. Buildings must be sound, attractive and well-maintained. Discussion #16: This objective was met when the capital improvements project was prioritized in 1990. Objective #17: The District has stated it would make adjustments to the Omaha Formula to meet the needs of buildings like McClellan that have special needs. Discussion #17: The custodial program is accountable by the Omaha Formula which is used by this District to proportion its custodial resources to its many facilities. This program is evaluated on a periodic basis. Every time there is an addition or change to a major facility structure the custodial structure is re-examined. It was last reexamined in December of 1993. It was submitted to the District and approved. Adjustments were made. The custodial program, at the present time, has sufficient manpower resources to meet its permanent needs. Temporary custodial needs, however, must be addressed by a separate correspondence. Obstacles to Goal Attainment: There is one principal obstacle to the desired goal attainment of an equitable Facilities Program, and that is resources. The Plant Services Directorate is far below the national and regional averages, and as such, falls further behind as its backlog of maintenance and repair increases on a yearly basis. The amount of work identified district-wide to keep our buildings in a good state of repair, and at an educational standard to support our programs, is mounting every year. With level or decreased funding each year, the backlog continues to increase. It is only through a higher funding level that we will be able to maintain our facilities to meet our operational needs. Recommendations: The Facilities Program, as reported under the Program Budget document, provides no guidance nor equitable measure to the Superintendent or Board of Directors on the success of the Facilities Program. This is something that is not measurable. The bulk of the Facilities Program is reacting to requests made by Facility Managers. As those requests are made, they are prioritized and they are funded. The addition of funds and resources would most assuredly allow more work to be accomplished by having it first identified, scheduled, and then completed. Without the resources to further identify additional work, it is not possible to identify how much work could be scheduled, and hence completed, thereby determining additional resources. Many of the items in the Facility Program Budget Document have been completed, and it has been recommended that they be deleted from this program. Recommendation fl: My recommendation would be to restructure the way the School District assesses its facilities. The bottom-line effort of the Little Rock School District is two-fold: 1) To maintain all of its facilities in a safe and orderly fashion to meet the goals of its educational program. 1. l DCE/rlh/pe 2) To insure that the resources allocated the Plant services Director are equitably spent such that no schools are given favoritism for resources over others. The establishment of the priority system, which is in place at the Plant Services Directorate, insures that this happens. It is only through outside pressures and perception of conditions in the past that the Facilities Program of equitable spending is sometimes off-balance. I would recommend that additional resources be given the Plant Services Directorate, such that they approximate at least the regional or national average of the CWE per school district to allow it to maintain its facilities to meet the goals as stated above. A business case is recommended. The overall recommendation is likely to have an increase in budgetary impact. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1) The program being evaluated as outlined in the desegregation portion of the Program Budget Document specifically identifies items in the Desegregation Plan and Court Orders and ODM Reports that do not give an overall view of the Facilities Program. The Program Budget Document merely responds to specific areas of concern and does not adequately see nor measure the Facilities Program. The Facilities Program is general engineering support to the entire district. As stated on page one of this document, it encompasses all aspects of the engineering program to support the many facilities. It goes far beyond seventeen (17) specific items as outlined in the Budget Document. 2) The data that has been used to analyze this program is simply a tally of work order requests as made by the Facilities' Managers and as recorded by the Plant Services Directorate. All recommendations listed here are considered in the support area. 3) There are no desegregation funds allotted the program under the Little Rock School District budget. This is not a prudent area to be reported, nor commented on for the purposes of monetary programming. DCE/rlh/pe\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1193","title":"Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational innovations","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1193"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nExhibit 310A\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS 1994-1995 1 of 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION : EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS 1994-1995 1 of 2 SEQ# 14 03 227 23 233 24 230 33 231 07 02 207 213 215 01 228 15 13 226 222 223 224 79 78 25/225 05 203 21 204 08 EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS (Alphabetical Order) Program Name Academic Progress Incentive Grant Academic Support Program Communication Services Computerized Transportation Contingencies Data Processing(deseg) Data Processing Services (non-deseg) Facilities Family Life Education/New Futures Federal Programs Four-Year-Old Program Gifted and Talented Guidance Services Health Services/Nursing Services HIPPY Human Resources Services McClellan Community School New Futures Planning and Evaluation Plant Services Pupil Transportation Purchasing Services Rockefeller Early Childhood Romine Interdistrict Safety and Security School Closings Special Education/Learning Center (deseg) Special Education (non-deseg) Staff Development Student Assessment Substitute Teacher Vocational Education (non-deseg) Vocational Education (deseg) EXTENDED EVALUATION ACADEMIC PROGRESS INCENTIVE GRANT (APIG) Program Description 1990 - 1991 The Academic Progress Incentive Grant (APIG) was first made available to each area school principal in the 1990-91 school year in the sum of $25,000. The process to be followed was for each school principal to write a proposal attached to a budget sheet identifying items and cost as related to the proposal being submitted. The use of the money was to be directly connected to and support of the school's yearly annual school plan. The school plan was developed cooperatively by the principal and staff with parent committee input. All participants were in agreement that the annual school plan supported the goals of the Little Rock School District as well as the following goal objectives. LRSD Goals 1. To increase educational achievement of all students with specific emphasis on closing disparities in achievement. 2. To establish climates of educational excellence in all schools through: a) providing equitable educational opportunities for all students m a desegregated learning environment\nb) enabling all students to develop a lifelong capacity and love for learning\nc) leading all students to be productive contributors in the school, the community and the workplace d) providing a disciplined, structured learning environment for all students. 3. To enhance human relations skills for principals, teachers, and central office administrators. 1. APIG Objectives To increase the academic achievement for identified students in the core curricular areas by providing teachers with a broad base of resources and equipment. To provide varied enrichment activities that would broaden identified students' experience base. 1 3. To involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for identified students' growth and success. 4. To provide staff development activities which meet the specific needs of identified students. The grant proposals were then to be forwarded to the Academic Progress Grant Committee for review and approval. Upon approval, the budget sheet was forwarded to the Financial Services Department, and budget codes were set up for the individual schools to use in purchasing the items requested. The respective assistant superintendent over the area schools who monitored the school's annual plan would review incoming requisitions to see if the purchases requested related to the school's plan. The schools' grant proposals were slow in corning in that year in addition to many of the grants being returned to principals for revisions. Several schools were successful in receiving early approval in the first semester for the full amount. The majority of schools, however, did not receive grant approval until late January and early February of 1991 and not for the full amount. Even though the money was received on a late timeline, it did enable the schools to purchase needed equipment, materials, supplementary reading materials, enrichment trips, etc. for all students as well as providing funds for some tutoring assistance to their at-risk groups before the MPT (Minimum Performance Test) and MAT-6 (Metropolitan Achievement Test Edition 6) test dates. Considering the timeline with a week out for Spring Break and two to three weeks scheduled for MPT and MAT-6 testing, the principals were asked only to write a narrative for the grant evaluations that would be no longer than three typed pages describing the status of their grant. The report was to include: 1. Identification of local school grant goals. 2. A description of the results. 3. Identification of any proposed change for the 1991-92 school year, if possible. These narratives were attached to the school's annual report and forwarded to their assistant superintendents. 1991 - 1992 In the second year of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant, the funds were frozen the first semester of the school year. Once the funds were released, the procedures set forward for application were the same as outlined in the 1990-91 school year except for one change. 2 The school grant proposals were now to come to the assistant superintendent over the school and then forwarded to the associate's office for his signature. Principals, teachers, and parents worked together to develop tutoring schedules for their atrisk students. After-school programs and Saturday programs were implemented to assist their various targeted groups. All of this was possible because of the funds received. During this year a new standardized test, Stanford 8, was given in the place of the MAT-6 test. Principals were asked to use the same reporting format in describing the status of their grant. The narrative was to be attached to their annual school report and forwarded to their assistant superintendent. 1992-93 In the third year of the APIG, the funds were reduced to $10,000 for which the area schools could apply. Again, many of these grants were not funded until November due to the busy schedules at the beginning of the school year. The principals were to use the same format for applying and reporting as was used in the 1991-92 school year. Focused Activities - Each area school shall have a fundamentally sound and strong basic educational program. Each area school shall also have the option of developing focused activities (which may center around a theme) after appropriate community and parental involvement. All focused activities must promote the desegregation objectives ordered by the court. SUMMARY: Focused Activities - The purpose of the focused activities shall be threefold: (1) to promote the school as a \"community of learning\" among parents, staff and students\n(2) to provide enrichment opportunities at the building level\n(3) to ensure equitable opportunities for participation in the elementary area schools. The focused activities of each area school will be integrated into the core curriculum or reflected in the . school's environment and day-to-day activities. The academic performance of area school students will indicate achievement gained partially as a result of enrichment experiences provided by the core program and enrichment activities. Area school students will participate in ongoing, meaningful enrichment activities that complement and extended the core curricular activities. All are:i. schools will be viewed by the community as providing equitable and excellent educational programs. A steering committee was appointed to chair the inservice for the principals in order to implement Focus Activities in their schools. The principals were then to establish a school based committee who would develop an activities action plan for the school year. From this action plan a checklist would be developed by the school's 3 i. ,- I' activities coordinator. The principal and school committee were to use the checklist to monitor the program. The activities coordinator would prepare a report each semester to be submitted to the assistant superintendent for review. The grant was to be reviewed by a district committee and the proposal, if approved would be granted. Program Goals The program goals listed below will ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations: 1) The grant opportunity would enrich each district's elementary curriculum to achieve greater racial balance through voluntary interdistrict and intradistrict transfers. 2) The Little Rock School District will establish an Academic Progress Incentive Grant Program, the goals of which will be to (a) improve the education of all students and (b) reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socio-economic, and gender groups. 3) Each non-magnet and non-incentive elementary school will provide focused activities for the total school population including attention to gender, race and socio-economic issues. 4) Each school will be recognized as a community of learning in which all students, staff members and parents are totally involved and supportive. 5) The focused activities of each non-magnet and non-incentive elementary school will be integrated into the core curriculum or reflected in the school's environment and day-to-day activities. 6) All elementary area school students will participate in ongoing, meaningful enrichment activities that complement and extend the core curricular activities. 7) All elementary area schools will be viewed by the Community as providing equitable and excellent educational programs. Evaluation Criteria Academic Incentive Grant Program - The number of low achievers will decrease as evidenced by upward quartile movement on the norm referenced test. 4 Focused Activities - At the end of each school year, the activities coordinator will include focused activities in a district-wide report. This report will focus on the following items: 1) the degree to which each focused activities have been interrelated with the core curriculum\n2) the number of enrichment activities that broadened the students' experience based\n3) the amount of parental involvement\n4) academic achievement as reflected on standardized tests and yearly grade reports\n5) the racial and socio-economic composition of the student population in each elementary area school\n6) the number of voluntary majority to minority transfers\n7) the type and amount of enrichment materials/supplies/purchased by each elementary area school through the focused activities budget\n8) the type and number of staff-development activities at each elementary school. Evaluation Results Evidence from the principals' narrative reports and surveys indicate that funds received from the APIG proposal over the three-year period were used to support the school plan as \"it related to the goals of the district.\" The programs and projects were numerous and were targeted to assist groups of students as well as the total school population. The selection of targeted groups are as follows: Principals and staff disaggregate test data by grade levels. Students that are 39 NCE and below go to the Reading Academic Support Program for assistance and those students below 30 NCE go to the Math Academic Support Program. The students whose NCE scores are between 40 and 49.9 NCE have not been eligible for the Academic Support Program. With the AIPG funds, plans can be made to assist these groups of students in the area of need in addition to any of the other who are in the Academic Support Program. At the conclusion of each school year, the principals would then submit in the narrative the names of the projects that were implemented, the list of students who were targeted, and if improvements were made. All of the reporting schools used their funds to provide activities interrelated to the core curriculum. It is also noted that school climate surveys 5 were used to target areas needing improvement. As a result of this data, principals, staff, and parents tried hard to provide a disciplined, structured learning environment for all students. An intense incentive progr:im was implemented to encourage good behavior. There were reports made by principals, staff, and parents, and program participants of the overall positive results that they could identify as happening for the benefit of the students. However, with all of the favorable behavior changes that were confirmed, achievement data did not reflect that the grants led to the disparity reduction that had been desired. Focus Activities - The Focus Activities of each non-magnet and non-incentive elementary school will be integra~ed into the core curriculum or reflected in the school's environment and day-to-day activities. All elementary area school students will participate in ongoing, meaningful enrichment activities that complement and extended the core curricular activities. Evidence - Academic Incentive Grant - The percentage of elementary principals reporting that their Academic Incentive Grant funds aided in the reduction of disparity on targeted groups are on file. Focused Activities - Steering committees have been identified in the area schools. To date, four proposals have been submitted for approval. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Obj. 1.0 To implement focused activities in elementary area schools.  Not Achieved The Focused Activities grant was provided to the schools in the spring of 1994. No data has been collected. Obj. 1 To provide means of local area schools to (A) improve the education of fill students, and (B) reduce the disparitv in achievement among students of different racial, socio-economic, and gender.  Not Achieved The quality of education was improved but not for ALL children. The lateness of funding did not provide for opportunities to organize and implement model programs. Eighteen weeks (second semester minus two weeks for testing and one for spring break) was not sufficient time to bring about the necessary academic improvement to offset the disparity in achievement levels. The $25,000 to Sl0,000 for the 1992-93 APIG. 6 Time prohibited the collection and analysis of data in order to provide uniform conclusions about the effectiveness of programming under the APIG. Parental support was limited in the planning and evaluation process. At the secondary level the majority of the impact of the Academic Progress Incentive Grant has been in directed assistance to the development of identified students in programs after the regular school day ends. Such an arrangement limits availability of students for program participation due w extra curricular activities, family responsibilities, and employment of students. Also, there is a need in some instances to show a more direct relationship between the strategies employed in a proposal and the attainment of the proposal goals under the Academic Progress Incentive Grant. Focused Activities - Proposals are presently being submitted and approved for the first time during the 1994-95 school year. Recommendation: Objective: Evaluation Criteria: Expected Benefits: Impact Analysis: Resource Analysis: Recommendations It is recommended that the Little Rock School District concentrate on the implementation of its new curriculum and standards. It is also recommended that any extra remediation be supported by the Chapter I funding and the Special Summer School for K-3. Discontinue the Academic Progress Incentive Grant and the Focused Activities Grant for the 1994-95 school year. The K-3 summer School and Chapter I evaluation will be utilized for documentation. The deletion of the APIG will provide the district in assisting with budget cuts and will enable schools to concentrate and implement a more uniform curriculum across the district. This is the fifth year for the Academic Progress Incentive Grants to be offered to area schools. Obligations implemented at this time will support the desegregation plan and address court orders favorally. Some principals, parents and board members may want to assure that extra funding is provided to the area schools :or equity reasons. The district will save a total of $445,000 by discontinuing both grants. (See graph below) 7 Elementary Junior High Senior High Total Schools Area Schools Area Schools Schools (3) (25) (4) APJG $10,000 $250,000 $40,000 $30,000 $320,000 Focused 5,000 125,000 125,000 - TOTAL $375,000 $40,000 $30,000 $445,000 Force Field Analysis: The primary supporters of this recommendation will be the parties involved in planning the budget for the 95-96 school year. Comments from previously principals in evaluations suggest that they will also support this recommendation. General Implementation Plans: The grant proposals will not be submitted in the 1995-96 school year budget. The Board will have to agree on this recommendation and the ultimate decision may be made by the federal courts. The programs will be evaluated at the end of this school year by the principals and the selection committee. Business Case is recommended: ___ Yes  No Plan modification is recommended:  Yes ___ No No budgetary impact. ___ _ Increased costs Decreased costs  8 Purpose ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM IN-DEPTH PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description The purpose of the Academic Support Program is to provide support for participating students in grades one through twelve in the areas of reading, language arts, and mathematics. The program reinforces and enhances the academic achievem~nt of these targeted students. The support is provided by certified reading specialists and English and mathematics teachers in the regular classroom, in additional classes, and in labs. scope and content All of the District's remediation programs are part of the Academic Support Program. All such programs are located at the individual school sites, except the Metropolitan VocationalTechnical Education Center. The Academic support Program offers a variety of options to the individual schools for providing accelerated reading/language arts and mathematics learning experiences for students identified through a process using multiple criteria. The program is characterized by providing either direct or indirect services to identified students through additional classes, smaller class sizes, or in-class assistance at the secondary level and in-class assistance or limited pullout at the elementary level. Elementary Academic Suppor~ Program At the elementary level, the primary delivery method in the area of mathematics is in-class assistance for grade level 2, and limited pull-out as a possible second strategy for grade levels 3-6. Grade 1 teachers attend special inservice sessions to better prepare them to meet the needs of their students. In the area of reading/language arts, minimal pull-out is used to provide for the learning needs of students ~ith identified reading deficits for grade levels 1-6. Indirect Services Reading and math specialists are paired with classroom teachers to assist in implementing accelerated learning experiences for students with identified reading and mathematics skills deficits. An instructional program and duration of services are established for each student in order to address individualized needs. The Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 2 revised curriculum is used by the regular teacher and the reading/mathematics specialists to provide a uniform and integrated approach to learning . Schedules are developed in cooperation with the regular teacher to determine appropriate time for specialists to provide services in the regular classroom. Time is allocated for the specialists to plan and consult with the regular teacher in order to ensure consistency in student learning. This cooperative planning allows for a team effort to best meet needs of students and to prevent fragmentation in teaching and learning. In addition, this approach improves and enhances educational opportunities for these students to experience academic success in the regular classroom. Through the alternative methods for delivery of instruction, students increase their time on task, make greater gains, and maintain progress. Direct Services For students identified with severe reading problems, a reading class is available to assist them in mastering fundamental reading skills and to stimulate their interest in reading. Reading teachers focus on mastery learning and use of listening labs and computer labs to diagnose, remediate, and assess specific learning problems, using a variety of curricular approaches including computer technology. This arrangement promotes program continuity, connected learning, student/teacher bonding, and shared accountability. Data secured through individual assessment and other relevant records are used to develop the student's program and establish the duration of services. Secondary Academic Support Program Secondary schools implement the Academic Support Program according to one or a combination of the following possible approaches: APPROACH ONE Indirect Services The academic team approach pairs English, reading, learning foundations, and mathematics teachers. These paired teams of teachers jointly plan appropriate whole group instruction, small group instruction, and individual instruction for learning experiences. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation page 3 Direct Services For students identified with severe reading problems, a reading class is available to assist them in mastering fundamental reading skills and to stimulate their interest in reading. APPROACH TWO Direct Services Regular classroom teachers work to meet the needs of their own targeted students. Smaller class sizes are scheduled for regular language arts and/or mathematics teachers to allow them to provide more individual assistance for targeted students during each class period. APPROACH THREE Direct Services The Language Arts Plus and Math Plus Programs are intended to reinforce regular instruction exclusively and to focus on specific student deficits. The Plus Programs add an enrichment class to schedules of targeted students. This concept utilizes the services of regular English and mathematics teachers in whose classes the targeted students are enrolled. The Language Arts Plus and Math Plus teachers teach up to four regular periods and during the remaining periods provide tutorial and accelerated learning experiences for all academic support students enrolled in each of their regular classes. Average class size is not to exceed 15 students per period in the teachers' plus class periods. The Language Arts Plus Program approach reduces the number of separate reading classes and the number of language arts students per teacher. The Math Plus Program approach also provides a reduced number of math students per teacher. EXTENDED SERVICES - ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY To support and extend learning opportunities for targeted students, the academic team concept is supplemented by making available to these students before-school, at lunch, and afterschool instructional services. Additionally, some sites may schedule periodic extended weeks in order to provide a practice and review session on Saturdays. Principals may use flexible scheduling of staff to provide some of their extended day services. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 4 The implementation of academic support programs may vary from school to school in design. However, the following common critical elements are evident in every program: instructional strategies including higher order thinking skills\nclose observance of time on task\nuse of the District's approved curriculum with appropriate materials and resources\na positive school climate that includes conveying high expectations for all students\nparent involvement designed to assure a collaborative partnership between parents and school\nproblem analysis consisting of collecting, analyzing, and disaggregating student data\nand monitoring, assessment, and evaluation. New staff members participate in development activities that assist them in use of curriculum guides as well as appropriate staff development activities for targeted students. Participants/Beneficiaries Target students are initially identified from the student population scoring in the lower quartile on the annual student assessment. Multiple criteria, including student grades, teacher recommendations, and student records are used to select students from the eligible population to participate in the Academic Support Program. Program Goal The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstream setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Specific objectives have been developed in order to designate what is to be accomplished to implement the adopted goals. The Academic Support Program includes the following objectives: 1. To identify and serve students who are at-risk in reading/language arts and mathematics. 2. To prescribe a personal education plan for targeted students. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation page 5 3. To reduce or eliminate pull-out academic support programs. 4. To provide parents with the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school. Evaluation Criteria The Academic Support Program has been evaluated by analyzing data from Spring 1992 through Fall 1994. Specifically the evaluation consists of: 1. Print-out of eligible students is provided to local school teams. Uniform District criteria are used (Stanford 8 cutoff score and multiple criteria) to identify targeted students. 2. Personal education plans of targeted students reflect implementation of the selected school option(s). 3. Individual student folders that include a systematic collection of student work, pre and post standardized test scores, grades, and recommendations to provide individual/group/school progress are maintained for continuous student and program progress. 4. Parental involvement reflects an increase in the numbers of parents attending parent conferences and parent training sessions and visiting schools. Evaluation Results Evaluation results reflect data gathered from several sources. These data have been compiled and analyzed and yield the following results, presented in correspondence with each previously stated objective. Objective 1 To identify and serve students who are at-risk in reading/language arts and mathematics. Each year the Academic Support Program options are explained to local school administrators and they are provided with an overview of how all of the individual Academic Support Programs are to be coordinated for continuity of services to children and efficient use of resources. Local school administrators select appropriate Academic Support Program components. I 11 I I II I I Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 6 Students eligible for participation in the Academic Support Program are identified from the District-wide printout of the Stanford 8 results. Identified students are those with total reading and/or mathematics scores falling within the lowest quartile on the Stanford 8 (total NCE of 35.8 or below). Multiple criteria, including student grades, teacher recommendations, and student records, are used to select targeted students from the identified population to participate in the Academic Support Program. Staff assignments are determined at the building-level and schedules are completed to ensure implementation of the selected school options. Discussion For the 1992-93 school year, thirteen secondary schools chose the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach, while one secondary school chose the Language Arts Plus Approach and three secondary schools chose the Direct Mathematics Approach. All elementary schools chose the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-1) For the 1993-94 school year, fourteen secondary schools chose the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach, while seven secondary schools chose the Language Arts Plus Approach and six secondary schools chose the Direct Mathematics Approach. All elementary schools chose the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-1) For the 1994-95 school year, fourteen secondary schools have chosen the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Direct/Indirect Approach. Seven secondary schools have chosen the Language Arts Plus Approach. All secondary schools have the Math Plus Approach with some degree of indirect services through pairing of regular math teachers with Math Plus teachers. (Appendix A-1) The District-wide printout of the Stanford 8 results for the 1992-93 school year revealed that 11,955 students were eligible for participation. For the 1993-94 school year, 11,044 students were eligible . For the 1994-95 school year, 12,033 students were eligible. (Appendix A-2) For the 1992-93 school year, uniform multiple criteria were used to identify 8,173 targeted students from the eligible population to be served by the Academic Support Program. For the 1993-94 school year, 7,466 students were selected. For the 1994-95 school year, 6,296 students have been selected, using the uniform multiple criteria. (Appendix A-2) Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation page 7 During the 1992-93 school year, 2,525 students at the secondary 1evel were served by the Indirect/Direct Approach, 26 students were served by the Language Arts Plus Approach and 287 students were served by the Direct Mathematics Approach. At the elementary level, 5,385 students were served by the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-3) During the 1993-94 school year, 2,212 students at the secondary level were served by the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. 466 students were served by the Language Arts Plus Approach and 622 students were served by the Direct Mathematics Approach. At the elementary level, 4,655 students were served by the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-3) During the 1994-95 school year, 3,230 students at the secondary level are being served by the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. 420 students are being served by the Language Arts Plus Approach and 760 students are being served by the Math Plus Approach. At the elementary level, 4,787 students are being served by the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-3) For the 1992-93 school year, a total of 52 teachers staffed the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach, while .6 teachers staffed the Language Arts Plus Approach and 6.1 teachers staffed the Mathematics Direct Approach. At the elementary level, a total of 82.4 teachers staffed the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-4)  For the 1993-94 school year, a total of 40.6 teachers staffed the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach, while 8.2 teachers staffed the Language Arts Plus Approach and 15.3 teachers staffed the Mathematics Direct Approach. At the elementary level, a total of 71.6 teachers staffed the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-4) For the 1994-95 school year, a total of 24.6 teachers staff the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach, while 46 teachers staff the Language Arts Plus Approach and 11.6 teachers staff the Mathematics Direct Approach and 14.2 teachers staff the Math Plus Approach. At the elementary level, a total of 73.05 teachers staff the Reading/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach. (Appendix A-4) --------------~- ----------- Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 8 Objective 2 To prescribe a personal education plan for targeted students. The Stanford 8 Individual Record Sheet serves as the basis for developing a personal education plan for each targeted student. The Little Rock School District Curriculum, which is correlated to the Stanford 8 objectives, is used as the curriculum in each program option at each school site. Schools are clustered for delivery of staff development and a schedule is developed to provide training to the staff responsible for delivering each Academic Support Program. Workshops are provided on the topics of specialized content area strategies, team planning, learning styles/cultural diversity, interactive teaching/learning, mastery learning, and cooperative team learning. Workshops are monitored to ensure that all topics have been addressed. Instruction and learning in the Academic Support Program settings are monitored regularly to determine student involvement, appropriateness of learning strategies and cultural diversity, creativity and resourcefulness, use of tutors, small group instruction, and extended day/week programs, teacher-student interaction, and increased student achievement and social skills. Technical assistance is provided on an as-needed basis in each of the areas monitored. TABLE B MONITORING CATEGORIES I SCHOOL TECHNICAL SCHOOL I YEAR \u0026amp; CLASSIFICATION I VISITS ASSISTANCE BASED I XEETINGS I ' i 1992-93 ELEMENTARY 413 40 24 I Totals SECONDARY 97 6 13 I i 1993-94 ELEMENTARY 241 175 4 SECONDARY 125 78 8 ! 1994-95 ELEMENTARY 175 12 47 to 12/6/94) SECONDARY 53 2 3 'Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 9 Discussion A comparison of the total number of training sessions conducted during the 1992-93 school year to the total number of sessions conducted during the 1993-94 school year reveals that there was an increase in the amount of technical provided by the reading/language and Mathematics Departments. During the 1992-93 school year, staff members made 593 monitoring visits. For the 1993-94 school _year, staff members made 631 monitoring visits. for the 1994-95 school year, 287 monitoring visits have been made to date by staff members. (Appendix B-1) Objective 3 To reduce or eliminate pull-out Academic Support Programs. The collection of appropriate data, including pre and post standardized test scores, student grades and records, samples of student work, and parent/teacher/student recommendations, serves as the basis for targeting students to be served by the Academic support Program. These data are analyzed for each student targeted to evaluate program effectiveness in remediating student achievement and contributing to the reduction or elimination of pull-out Academic Support Program components. Discussion A three year comparison of the students served by the Academic support Program shows that the number of students decreased in four out of nine grade levels in reading and mathematics from 1992 to 1993. The number of students served decreased at all grade levels in reading and mathematics from 1993 to 1994. (Appendix C-1) For the 1993-94 school year, the Language Arts Plus Approach increased to seven schools from only one during the 1992-93 school year. Six secondary schools also chose the Mathematics Direct Approach, representing an increase of three schools over the 1992-93 school year. These changes represent a trend at the secondary level away from an exclusive Rea.ding/Language Arts/Mathematics Indirect/Direct Approach toward more Direct Approaches. The trend continues in 1994-95 as all thirteen secondary schools use the Direct Math Plus Approach and maintain the same level of Language Arts Plus that was established in 1993-94. (Appendix A-1) ' Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 10 Objective 4 To provide parents the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school. Parents were assisted in obtaining the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school through provision of information about students' achievement and behavior, conferences about their children, and the establishment of parent/school partnerships. Discussion A comparison of 1992-93 parent activity documentation to the 1993-94 parent activity documentation reveals there has been an increase in the number of participating parents. The number of parents involved during 1993-94 increased two and a third times the rate of parental participation during the 1992-93 school year. Twenty-eight of the twenty-nine schools where data were collected showed positive gains in parent participation. (Appendix D) Data have not yet been compiled showing participation during the 1994-95 school year. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Obstacles to goal attainment are indicated by specific objectives: 1. To identify and serve students who are at-risk in reading/language arts and mathematics. Although this objective is achieved, it has not been achieved in a timely manner. Students identified for Academic Support Program service need to be identified prior to the beginning of the school year during which they are to be served. The identification process should begin in the spring of the preceding year with teacher recommendations based on multiple criteria followed by a review of each recommended student's test score results in early summer. By matching teacher recommendations and test score results, the population in need of service can be determined in time to ensure that appropriate Academic Support Program components are in place at each school site when the new school year begins. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 11 2. To prescribe a personal education plan for targeted students. This objective is largely achieved\nhowever, some folders are not complete because teachers do not have sufficient information to develop the plans. Individual Test Records (Stanford 8) for all Academic Support students are needed in order for teachers to develop the personal education plans. 3. To reduce or eliminate pull-out Academic Support Programs. Although progress toward reducing pull-out components of the Academic Support Program has been made in mathematics, more work needs to be done in reading/language arts at the elementary and junior high levels. While the data reveal a three year decrease in the total number of students needing services, too many students continue to need service from year-to-year after they enter the Academic Support Program. This fact requires a re-examination of the kinds of services available to students in reading/language arts at grades K-3 and grades 7-9. Several components of the current Academic Support Program are proving successful, most notably the language arts/mathematics plus classes (Approach Three) at the secondary level. Unfortunately, only two of the eight junior high schools are currently using the language arts plus model, while the other six continue to rely exclusively on Approach One, where traditional reading classes dominate without the direct support of the English teachers. More language arts plus classes are needed. At the elementary level, too much emphasis continues to be placed on traditional reading classes as a remediation strategy at all grade levels. The data do not indicate any concentrated effort on intervention/prevention at grades K- 3, where reading skills are developed. The current Academic Support Program lacks sufficient options at these grade levels necessary for developing the skills of the immature reader. The options for the primary grade levels need to be overhauled and expanded to ensure adequate support for students who are at-risk of becoming permanently trapped by the remediation cycle. Expansion of services must include concentrated approaches such as Reading Recovery, complemented by a greater degree of cooperation and interaction between the classroom teacher and the reading teacher. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 12 4. To provide parents the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school. Although this objective is largely achieved at the elementary level, there is a need for strengthening efforts at the secondary level. Recommendation 1 Teacher recommendations based on analysis of multiple criteria should be made in the spring of the school year prior to the school year during which Academic Support Program service is to be provided. These recommendations should be forwarded to Central Office to be matched with test results as soon as they are available in order to determine the population to be served. This population should be identified on a customized printout, designed to reconcile teacher recommendations with test cut-off scores. The customized printout would be used to determine service needs so that appropriate Academic support Program components are in place at each school site before the new school year begins. Additionally, multiple copies of the customized printouts need to be in each school. at the beginning of the school year to facilitate timely service to all targeted students. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to ensure timely identification and selection of students to participate in the Academic Support Program and to serve targeted students by developing personal education plans based on their Stanford 8 Individual Test Recordf. Evaluation Criteria Documentation will indicate that the selection and identification processes occur in a timely and efficient manner and that program teacher record keeping is complete. Expected Benefits The District will meet its commitment of reducing academic disparity and pull-out programs. Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 13 Impact Analysis This recommendation will assist the District in providing appropriate instructional opportunities for students with identified needs in reading/language arts and in mathematics. As the students are served, pull-out programs and learning disparity will be reduced. Resource Analysis The Language Arts Office, Planning, Research and Evaluation Department, and the Data Processing Department will generate the necessary forms. The Office of Federal Programs will gather and report data so that analysis can be made. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation will be central office supervisors, director of federal programs, building principals, IRC reading and mathematics specialists, program teachers, students, and parents. There are no known detractors. General Implementation Plan 4/1/95 5/1/95 6/1/95 7/1/95 Activity Teacher recommendation based on multiple criteria. Teacher recommendation forms forwarded to Central Office Teacher recommendations matched with test results Customized printout forwarded to schools Person(s) Responsible Elementary classroom teachers, Secondary Language Arts/Math teachers Building Principals Director of Data Processing Director of Data Processing Academic Support Program In Depth Program Evaluation Page 14 Recommendation 2 Language Arts Plus classes should be included as an Academic Support Program option in all junior high schools. Utilization of this component would restructure the junior high school English departments, enabling regular English teachers to serve targeted students in additional enrichment classes. These teachers would teach up to four regular English classes and during the remaining periods would provide tutorial and accelerated learning experiences for all academic support students enrolled in each of their regular classes. The Language Arts Plus Program would reduce the current number of reading classes taught by additional teachers. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to reduce or eliminate pull-out Academic Support Program approaches by providing additional instructional time to targeted students with their regular English teachers. Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will include personal education plans for targeted students, annual district printouts of standardized test scores, and annual reports on numbers of students eligible for service through the Academic Support Program and numbers of students actually served. Review of these criteria will indicate increased student mastery of District learning objectives, increased standardized test scores, decreased numbers of students eligible for Academic Support Program services, and decreased numbers of students actually served. Expected Benefits The District will meet its commitment of reducing academic disparity and pull-out programs. Impact Analysis This recommendation will assist the District in providing appropriate instructional opportunities for students with identified needs in reading/language arts. As the students are served, pull-out programs and learning disparity will be reduced. Academic Support Program In Depth Evaluation page 15 Resource Analysis This recommendation will utilize existing junior high school English department staff, while reducing the total number of reading specialists needed at the junior high level. Teachers and students will use the existing curriculum and textbooks. No additional classroom materials will be needed. force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation will be central office personnel, including supervisors and directors, building principals, teachers, students, and parents. Anticipated detractors will include reading teachers whose positions will be eliminated. General Implementation Plan Activity Person(s) Responsible 4/1/95 5/1/95 6/1/95 7/ 1 / 95 7/1/95 Teacher recommendations based on multiple criteria Teacher recommendation forms forwarded to Central Office Teacher recommendations matched with test results customized printout forwarded to schools Students and teachers assigned to Language Arts Plus classes Sixth grade teachers and secondary English teachers Building Principals Director of Data Processing Director of Data Processing Building Principals Academic Support Program In Depth Evaluation Page 16 Recommendation 3 The current Academic Support Program needs to be restructured at the elementary school level to ensure adequate support for students who are at-risk of becoming permanently trapped by the remediation cycle. This restructuring should focus on providing appropriate program components at grades K-3, where reading skills are developed. An aggressive intervention/prevention program targeting these grade levels would reduce the overall size of the Academic Support Program by mainstreaming before the fourth grade students who would otherwise continue to need the support of the current program. Expansion of services must include concentrated approaches such as Reading Recovery, supplemented by a greater degree of cooperation and interaction between the classroom teacher and the reading teacher. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to reduce or eliminate pull-out Academic Support and academic disparity. Evaluation Criteria Evaluation criteria will include personal education plans for targeted students, annual district printouts of standardized test scores, and annual reports on numbers of students eligible for service through the Academic Support Program and numbers of students actually served. Review of these criteria will indicate increased student mastery of District learning objectives, increased standardized test scores, decreased numbers of students eligible for Academic Support Program services, and decreased numbers of students actually served. Expected Benefits The District will meet its commitment of reducing academic disparity and pull-out programs. Impact Analysis This recommendation will assist the District in providing appropriate instructional opportunities for students with identified needs in reading/language arts. As the students are served, pull-out programs and learning disparity will be reduced. Academic Support Program In Depth Evaluation Page 17 Resource Analysis This recommendation will require reallocating available Chapter One funds to provide for staffing needs, materials and supplies, and staff development. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation will be central office personnel, including supervisors and directors, building principals, teachers, students, and parents. Anticipated detractors will include reading teachers whose position will be eliminated. General Implementation Plan Activity Person{s) Responsible 4/1/95 5/1/95 6/1/95 7/1/95 8/1/95 Teacher recommendations based on multiple criteria Teacher recommendation forms forwarded to Central Office Teacher recommendations matched with test results Customized printout forwarded to schools Students and teachers assigned to Academic Support Program Classroom teachers Building principals Director of Data Processing Director of Data Processing Building principals I I .i :I\ni ' ' ! INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Central J. A. Fair Hall McClellan Parkview Magnet JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Cloverdale Dunbar Magnet Forest Heights Henderson Magnet Mabel vale Mann Pulas}~i Heights Southwest l-.l t. Learning Ctr. ~I.,EMENTARY SCHOOLS l-.11 APPENDIX A-1 ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS APPROACHES ONE, TWO, THREE 1992-93 READING/LANGUAGE ARTS ONE TWO THREE Indirect/ Language Direct Direct Arts Plus X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .ppendix A-1 (page 1 of 3) MATHEMATICS ONE TWO Indirect/ Direct Direct X I X X X X I I X I X X X X X I X I X I X --- ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS APPROACHES ONE, TWO, THREE I 1993-94 READING/LANGUAGE ARTS MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH ONE TWO THREE ONE TWO 1, Indirect/ Language Indirect/ I Direct Direct Arts Plus Direct Direct ,,, SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Central X X X 1,11 J. A. Fair X X X I Hall X X 11 McClellan X X X Parkview Magnet X X X JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Cloverdale X X Dunbar Magnet X X Forest Heights X X Ii Henderson Magnet X X II Mabel vale X X X II Mann X X X X Pulaski Heights X X X Southwest X X Alt. Learning Ctr. X ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS All X X I ~ I I I I ~pendix A-1 (page 2 of 3) II II - ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS APPROACHES ONE, TWO, THREE 1994-95 READING/LANGUAGE ARTS MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTIONAL ONE TWO THREE ONE TWO THREE APPROACH Indirect Language Indirect Math /Direct Direct Arts Plus /Direct Direct Plus SENIOR HIGHS Central X X X X I J. A. Fair X X X Hall X X X McClellan X X X X Parkview X X X X JUNIOR HIGHS Cloverdale X X X Dunbar X X X Forest Hts. X X X Henderson X X X Mabel vale X X X X Mann X X X X X I Pulaski Hts. X X X ii Southwest X X X I :1, Alt. Ln. Ctr. X I II 1: ELEMENTARY All X X f.ppendix A-1 (page 3 of 3) . l READING/LANGUAGE TOTAL TESTED # ELIGIBLE Spring 1992 1992-93 Gr. 1 2,094 Gr. 2 804 Gr. 2 1,881 Gr. 3 707 Gr. 3 1,783 Gr. 4 649 Gr. 4 1,904 Gr. 5 524 Gr. 5 1,922 Gr. 6 685 Gr. 6 1,843 Gr. 7 473 Gr. 7 1,795 Gr. 8 668 Gr. 8 1,573 Gr. 9 599 Gr. 9 1,554 Gr. 10 494 Gr. 10 1,602 Gr. 11 495 Gr. 11 1,472 Gr. 12 357 Appendix A-2 (page 1 of 3) APPENDIX A-2 READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST 1992-93 ARTS # SERVED TOTAL TESTED 1992-93 Spring 1992 700 Gr. 1 2,094 599 Gr. 2 1,881 560 Gr. 3 1,783 505 Gr. 4 1,904 570 Gr. 5 1,922 428 Gr. 6 1,843 432 Gr. 7 1,795 282 Gr. 8 1,573 142 Gr. 9 1,554 137 Gr. 10 1,602 69 Gr. 11 1,472 MATHEMATICS # ELIGIBLE # SERVED 1992-93 1992-93 Gr. 2 625 531 Gr. 3 418 455 Gr. 4 358 491 Gr. 5 324 467 Gr. 6 406 507 Gr. 7 332 284 Gr. 8 544 276 Gr. 9 621 254 Gr. 10 728 360 Gr. 11 672 95 Gr. 12 472 29 --- -- --- ------------------------ READING/LANGUAGE TOTAL TESTED I ELIGIBLE Spring 1993 1993-94 Gr. 1 1,941 Gr. 2 686 Gr. 2 1,912 Gr. 3 714 Gr. 3 1,770 Gr. 4 575 Gr. 4 1,715 Gr. 5 486 Gr. 5 1,821 Gr. 6 623 Gr. 6 1,855 Gr. 7 466 Gr. 7 1,716 Gr. 8 603 Gr. 8 1,571 Gr. 9 548 Gr. 9 1,506 Gr. 10 471 Gr. 10 1,587 Gr. 11 403 Gr. 11 1,383 Gr. 12 392 Appendix A-2 (page 2 of 3) READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST 1993-94 ARTS # SERVED TOTAL TESTED 1993-94 Spring 1993 514 Gr. 1 1,941 584 Gr. 2 1,912 499 Gr. 3 1,770 435 Gr. 4 1,715 475 Gr. 5 1,821 457 Gr. 6 1,855 503 Gr. 7 1,716 407 Gr. 8 1,571 195 Gr. 9 1,506 190 Gr. 10 1,587 110 Gr. 11 1,383 MATHEMATICS I ELIGIBLE 1993-94 Gr . 2 584 Gr. 3 405 Gr. 4 411 Gr. 5 197 Gr. 6 329 Gr. 7 303 Gr. 8 555 Gr. 9 539 Gr. 10 691 Gr. 11 547 Gr. 12 516 # SERVED 1993-94 366 334 360 218 324 305 354 422 335 72 7 READING/LANGUAGE TOTAL TESTED I ELIGIBLE Spring 1994 1994-95 Gr. 1 1,957 Gr. 2 625 Gr. 2 1,771 Gr. 3 663 Gr. 3 1,788 Gr. 4 666 Gr. 4 1,720 Gr. 5 493 Gr. 5 1,694 Gr. 6 584 Gr. 6 1,763 Gr. 7 561 Gr. 7 1,810 Gr. 8 627 Gr. 8 1,718 Gr. 9 608 Gr. 9 1,568 Gr. 10 569 Gr. 10 1,509 Gr. 11 414 Gr. 11 1,448 Gr. 12 416 Appendix A-2 {page 3 of 3) READING/LANGUAGE ARTS/MATHEMATICS STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST 1994-95 ARTS I SERVED TOTAL TESTED 1994-95 Spring 1994 580 Gr. 1 1,952 571 Gr. 2 1,775 487 Gr. 3 1,783 382 Gr. 4 1,717 439 Gr. 5 1,687 403 Gr. 6 1,760 445 Gr. 7 1,792 410 Gr. 8 1,688 182 Gr. 9 1,564 146 Gr. 10 1,503 110 Gr. 11 1,439 MATHEMATICS I ELIGIBLE I SERVED 1994-95 1994-95 Gr. 2 548 476 Gr. 3 455 388 Gr. 4 528 445 Gr. 5 306 244 Gr. 6 356 291 Gr. 7 462 274 Gr. 8 691 378 Gr. 9 644 501 Gr. 10 770 358 Gr. 11 514 22 Gr. 12 533 1 Extended Program Evaluation Communication Services Completed by: Dina Teague Communications Specialist December 14, 1994 Program Name Communication Services Program Description: Program Purpose: To keep all publics informed of the actions of the LRSD and its programs. Scope and Content: The Communication Services program is in place to facilitate the transferrance of information between district employees, board members and administrators. and the District itself with the public. All conventional means of communications are used from telephone and written correspondence. to television production and programming. In addition to being the primary source of infonnation for community members and the news media. the communications office also provides assistance to other district offices and school building personnel. The communication services program encompasses all functions of the communications office that are not specifically mentioned in the desegregation programmatic areas. Panicipants: Participants in the communication services program are primarily the employees of the communications department: Director of Communications, Communications Specialist, Secretary, part-time COE Student Worker, and District Receptionist. All functions of the department are under the direction of the Associate Superintendent of Desegregation. Beneficiaries: District students, patrons, board members, and employees benefit from good internal communication as well as external communication with tax payers. community members, opinion leaders. and media representatives. Program Goal To suppon the education mission and all of the goals and objectives of the Little Rock School District through improved community awareness. understanding and confidence. Evaluation Criteria 1.0 Documents available 2.0 Employee Directory 3.0 Media requests answered 4.0 Public requests answered 5.0 Internal requests completed 6.0 Clipping file 7 .0 Events completed 8.0 Bulk mailings completed 9.0 NIA I 0.0 Copy of Annual Report 11.0 Copy of videos 12.0 Board information prepared 13.0 LRSD representative on KLRE Board 14.0 Required reports available I 5.0 Documents available 16.0 Cable 4 operational, equipment up and running, Cable 4 updated, videos produced 17.0 Budget maintained 18.0 Correspondence completed 19.0 Projects in place, visits scheduled 20.0 Office maintained 2 Evaluation Results O~iective 1.0 Assist the Superintendent's office with technical writing and computer support, and other special projects, as requested. The communications staff produces various written documents such as scripts, resolutions. and letters for the Superintendent as needed. ( 1.1 J Various computer generated documents such as the district organizational chart, citations. etc. are produced on a regular basis. ( 1.2) From time to time assistance with special projects such as board photos. assembly of needed information, and meeting scheduling is provided. (1.3) Objective 2.0 Produce a district employee directory. The Communications Secretary annually gathers information with the assistance of Human Resources. She then organizes copy, secures advertising. and schedules printing of the employee directory. (2.1 ) Objective 3.0 Respond to all media requests. The Communications Director and Communications Specialist record all requests and obtain clearance from the Associate Superintendent of Desegregation to respond. (3.1, 3.lAJ When clearance is given, they gather infonnation or arrange interviews as appropriate and contact the media representative with a response. (3.3. 3.4) If necessary, requests are forwarded to the Superintendent. (3.1) All other request fonns are sent to the Superintendent upon completion. Objective 4.0 Respond to public requests for information The same procedure described above is followed unless a patron is requesting a district publication. Calendar and brochure requests are honored immediately upon receipt. Objective 5.0 Respond to all internal requests for information The same procedure described above is used to respond to internal requests. Objective 6.0 Maintain a clipping file of all education-related articles The communications office subscribes to all local newspapers and news magazines. The publications are reviewed each day and all articles related to education or to the Little Rock School District are clipped. copied and filed by date. (6.1, 6.3) A log is kept to facilitate research on a given subject. 16.2) Objective 7.0 Schedule. plan, and execute special events The communications staff plans and executes many special events at the request of the Superintendent or other administrators. Staff members often work closely with other departments such as Human Resources or the Superintendent's Office staff on these events. 3 Objective 7.0 (continued, Examples are the annual retirement pany \u0026lt;7.11 and the newly implemented winter holiday parties. Objective 8.0 Assist in district /schools bulk mailings The Communications Secretary coordinates bulk mailings of many district publications such as the calendars. recruitment surveys. and brochures. She also instructs school level employees and PTA members on bulk mailing procedures. (8.1 l Objective 9.0 Di-stribution of mail, faxes. and all internal communications The District Receptionist. with the help of the part-time COE Student Worker. operates the district switchboard and fax machine as well as distributes all district office external and internal mail. and fax transmissions. (9.1. 9.3. 9.4 \u0026amp; 9.5) They also stamp all mail and register district cenified mail. 19.2J Objective 10.0 Prepare district's Annual Repon Each fall, the Director of Communications gathers information for, generates graphics for and writes the District's Annual Report. (10.1, 10. 2 \u0026amp; 10.3) She then distri.butesthe report at board meetings and advertises the report in the newspaper. (10.4) Objective 11.0 Write scripts. edit and produce district videos The office of communications responds to all requests for video production and must rely on the teaching staff of Metropolitan Vo-Tech and the availability of their equipment to be able to create videos. Objective 12.0 Produce news releases and support documents for the Board of Directors The Communications Specialist prepares media advisories to notify the media of all board functions and advises them of agenda items or discussion topics as appropriate. ( 12. l ) Each member of the communications staff works to provide any information or materials requested by board members for their presentations. 02.2) Generally this refers to special citations presented by board members. Objective 13.0 Represent the district on the KLRE Board The director of communications attends all KLRE Board meetings, serves on the Personnel Committee. and attends special events. (13.1. 13.2 \u0026amp; 13.3 )* O~iective 14.0 Prepare required reports The communications department has prepared reports such as Coopers and Lybrand Outsourcing Report. Financial Reports. coun preparations. etc. as requested. ( 14.1 J* 4 Objective 15.U Provide technical writing support for other district departments The communications department has prepared documents. fliers. letters for other LRSD departments. such as ADA Campaign. and EPA notifications for Plant Services as requested.* Objecrive 16.0 Maintain. operate and produce Cable Channel 4 programming. The Communications Secretary coordinates all maintenance calls for equipment. (16. l l She also updates the district calendar and airs district videos.(16.2J O~iective 17.0 Preparation and maintenance of department budget and budget-related documents The Director of Communications maintains the budget and monitors department spending. 117. l l* Ol\u0026gt;jective 18.0 Correspondence to schools and community All members of the communications staff write thank you notes and letters as appropriate. (18.l l Objective 19.0 Develop and execute special projects with community group\\ No evaluation results.* Objective 20.0 General Non-Desegregation related office administration The communications staff orders supplies. maintains equipment. etc. as needed. (20.l l ,:, Please see attached memo from Dina Teague regarding these items. 5 Recommendations: No recommendations are made at this time. I feel it would be inappropriate for me as the Communications Specialist to suggest changes. Although many staff members have expressed an understanding that I am the Acting Director of Communications. an official change in title has not been made and I do not want to overstep my authority. It is my understanding that a Director of Communications will be in place in approximately one month. I feel that it would be more appropriate for the new director to suggest changes under the advisement of the Associate Superintendent of Desegregation (primary leader). 6 Addendum Program description: The purpose of the communication services program is to keep all publics infonned of the actions of the LRSD and its programs. The Communication Services program is in place to facilitate the transferrance of information between district employees. board members and administrators. as well as the District itself and the public. The communication services program encompasses all functions of the communications office that are not specifically mentioned in the desegregation programmatic areas. Participants in the communication services program are primarily the employees of the communications depanment: Director of Communications, Communications Specialist, Secretary. part-time COE Student Worker, and District Receptionist. All functions of the department are under the direction of the Associate Superintendent of Desegregation. District students, patrons, board members, and employees benefit from good internal communication as well as external communication with tax payers, community members. opinion leaders, and media representatives. Recommendations: No recommendations are made. 7 I I I I 11 I 11 I ' Human Resources Services The Human Resources Department serves the District as the focal point for all staffing functions including recrui tin9, hiring, staffing, transfers, promotions, salary schedules, benefits coordination and compliance with state and federal regulations as they apply to public schools. The Human Resources Department also serves as the unit responsible for the coverage of classes as needed with substitutes. Recommendations are listed as follows: 1. A more complete and comprehensive salary study be conducted. Preferably, the study would be done by an outside consulting firm to assure impartial, unbiased results as well as a timely study. To do the study internally would require vast amounts of man-hours from the Human Resources staff. Communications Services The Communications Services program is in place to facilitate the transference of information between district employees, board members and administrators, and the District itself with the public. In addition to being the primary source of information for community members and the news media, the communications office also provides assistance to other district offices and school building personnel. The communication services program encompasses all functions of the communications office that are not specifically mentioned in the desegregation programmatic areas. Recommendations are listed as follows: * No recommendation are made at this time 1, I II Ii I Ii I' I' Ii Ii I I I II I I I I I Evaluation criteria Specific evaluation criteria include: 1.0 Adequate service provided in support of programs. Determined by dividing numbers of requests by number provided. 1.1 All buses assigned only two routes. 1.2 Students effectively and efficiently routed to facilitate a smooth school opening 1988-89. 1. 3 Significant reduction in street address errors introduced by poor/inadequate data entry. 1. 4 No student required to exceed four blocks/six blocks walk. 1. 5 Published policies on student behavior /safety on LRSD buses. Published policies for drivers/driver aides to assist in communicating the districts' position on transportation safety procedures. Frequent meetings to address safety issues and concerns. Attendance verified through sign-in sheets. Review of supervisor's monitoring report. 1. 6 Routes generated based upon current assignment information. 1.7 Two mile list published and distributed to school staff . Add transportation policies and procedures. 1.8 Written request for student data forwarded. incremental initiated by routing supervisor. Research error listing to within 5%. Completion of first day prior to registration. Evaluation Results Census system routes Evaluation results were gathered from data available within the historical records in the Transportation Department. Objective 1. o The Transportation Department will request additional resources to help provide transportation support for evening and extended day programs. All request for extended day and evening support were honored in 1993-94. 2 ' Discussion The district has consistently requested additional resources from the state to support the M to Mand magnet programs. Extended day activities are provided based on requests submitted to the Transportation Department and the assets available to support these requests. Miles are added to the fleet each time a bus is used to support evening and extended day programs. These programs are charged a fee to cover the basic cost of the driver plus $1.31 a mile which has been established as the cost to run the bus one mile. Currently, all requests for support are being honored. In the future, consideration must be given to the impact such programs have on the life of the fleet and its primary purpose of transporting students to and from school. Objective 1.1 In 1990-91 the District reduced its number of runs from three to two. The district returned to a two run system - one elementary and one secondary - in the 1990-91 school year. Discussion The limit of a two run system determines the maximum number of routes that can be scheduled based on the number of available buses. With the expansion of the majority to minority (M to M) transfer program, resources have been redirected to support these students. For M to M students a route may be as much as 90 minutes long and the bus may stop at two or m~re schools. Therefore, these buses have only one route. Regular LRSD Buses generally have two routes. One route for elementary school is 45 minutes and the second route for secondary school is 45 minutes. Each bus, generally goes to only one school per run. Special Education buses have two runs of 45 minutes and may go to two or more schools on each run. Elementary students are usually on the first run and secondary students are on the second run. Currently, the number of students on each run varies from one to eight students, with four students as an average. This is a very expensive way to transport students. 3 I, I I I II II ,' I Some buses serve as few as four students while other buses serve 65 students. If regular route buses were to go to more than one school, some buses could be combined to free up additional assets for the regular program. Objective 1.2 LRSD has made progress in the utilization of the ECOTRAN MAPNET System. 1988-89 school opening. This item completed 06/90, and is not recurring. Objective 1.3 There is extensive work to be done in updating the geographic files, tables with the LRSD database. The number of errors found in 1993-94 were 6000 when data base was initially loaded. Discussion All new streets are added to the ECOTRAN MAPNET System based on the information provided by the LR City Engineers. When an error list is run, the street names/numbers are compared to the post office street names/numbers upon which the district data base is built. The ECOTRAN Database is changed to match the district data base. At the beginning of 1994-95 only 500 errors were initially fo~nd. An update is currently under way using November data. Objective 1.4 School attendance areas and upda~ed walk zones need to be encoded into map files. Based on the information in the data base, no student was required to walk more than four blocks to the bus if an elementary student or more than six blocks as a secondary student. Students who are within the walk zone are required to walk if no courtesy stop is provided. Discussion The Transportation Department continuously receives requests for closer bus stops than the four/six blocks criteria due to safety and supervision issues. Many parents state that four/ 4 six blocks is too far for the student to walk. Accommodating these requests can increase the routing time and require buses to go into areas that are difficult to maneuver within on large buses. Objective 1.5 (Transportation Safety Policies need to be reviewed and updated properly. Changes will be incorporated from Applicable Board Policies and Administrative Directives). Discussion The policies of the Transportation Department were governed by a negotiated agreement with the Classroom Teachers Association for the 1993-94 school year. The association lost its recognition for the 1994-95 school year. The practices and procedures were reviewed and published in the fall of 1994. Safety meetings are scheduled and conducted on a regular basis by the safety supervisors. Objective 1.6 (Assignment promotion population region tables need to be created to ensure proper student assignment). Discussion The data processing department provides tapes that are used to generate routes based on current assignment information. Objective 1.7 All school attendance areas will be encoded into the geographic tables. Corresponding walk zones will be generated for schools, all transportation policies will be reviewed and updated. The two mile lists were established after the attendance zone boundaries were encoded. The policies and procedures for the Transportation Department are shared annually with principals and assistant principals. 5 1 I II I ' Objective 1.8 An entire new stop network will be generated to improve efficiency and most economically utilize District resources. Census information provided by data processing was used to establish first day routes prior to registration. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Objective 1.0 Objective achieved 1.1 \" 1.2 \" 1.3 \" 1.4 \" 1.5 \" 1.6 \" 1.7 \" 1.8 \" \" Recommendations The failure of the Transportation Department to reach its stated program goal was not related to the program entitled Computerized Transportation Routing System. The factors involved manpower shortage, equipment failure, and the proposal to outsource. However, the district could profit from upgrading the system to the current edition of the software. Recommendation 1: Upgrade the ECOTRAN software and hardware to utilize the Mapnet Plus system similar to the Pulaski County School District system. Evaluation criteria: The routes prepared for the opening of school reflect the information available in the district's data base on August 1, 1995. 6 Expected Benefits: The amount of time required to route all buses for the district will be reduced. By training the staff, effective utilization of the special features in the system will enhance the routing procedures. To the degree the system is used in strategic planning, the system will allow the district to try several different attendance patterns and levels of organization based on the capacity of various schools. Impact Analysis: 1. Program. The computerized routing system will improve the efficiency of the routing process. Negatives a. The system will be down during the upgrade process and during training. Positives a. The routing process will be faster. b. The data base can be directly downloaded from the mainframe. c. The system will be compatible with the Pulaski County Special School District routing system. d. Reports can be generated concerning transported students to include race ~nd grade. e. The system can projecting attendance boundaries. 2. Desegregation Plan be used for strategic zone enrollments based planning by on varying The upgrade supports the Desegregation Plan to provide computerized routing system to optimize travel times. 3. court Orders There should be no impact on court orders. 7 I I I 4. Political factors The collaboration between the Pulaski County Special School District and the LRSD Transportation Department concerning student transportation and staff training would occur. 5. Risks There appears to be no risks to upgrading the system. The risk to not upgrading the system is not being able to use the system for strategic planning. 6. Timing Some cost savings could be realized by deciding to upgrade immediately. Also, training needs to be conducted for those individuals who will be operating the system before its full potential can be realized. Resource Analysis 1. Personnel Analysis No additional positions are needed to support this project. The number of individuals to be trained will depend upon how the system will be used. At least three individuals will receive training to support the routing of buses . 2. Financial Analysis a. The upgrade software will cost $16, 900. The cost of computer equipment to support upgrade is $5,104. If both stations are upgraded, an additional $200 will be required for the software and another $5,104 for the hardware. The total cost will be $27,308. The annual Maintenance/License fee will $1,635. b . The source of revenue would be from the current Transportation Department budget. Force Field Analysis 1. Forces For The supervisors directly responsible for routing will support the project because the time to route would be reduced. 8 Administrators involved in strategic planning should support the upgrade because it will allow them to experiment with several senecios and see the impact on student assignments when changing boundaries. The other parties who have an interest in assignment plans should support the upgrade because the software could be used to respond to their \"what if\" questions. 2. Forces Against The issue related to spending this money for the upgrade rather than saving for next year's budget would be a detractor. However, the value of being able to interface with Pulaski County School District and the increased accuracy of the routes because the information will come directly from the data base should overcome objections. I. General Implementation Plan Milestones Timeline Tasking 1. Proposal sent to Associate Superintendent 01/07/95 Cheatham 2. Approval of Proposal 02/01/95 Mayo 3. Order Upgrade of software/hardware 02/15/95 Neal 4. Installation of upgrade 03/15/95 Contractors 5. Staff Training 04/01/95 ECOTRAN 9 I I II I I\nI I I I I I ADDENDUM Program Evaluation Computerized Transportation A brief description of program being evaluated: The primary component is the Transportation Planning and Management System which is the routing and scheduling software. In addition, there is the Map Build and Maintenance System which updates the map, Census Processing which allows for matching the student file to the map file, and the Geographic Enrollment Analysis System which is redistricting software that can be used to propose modifying boundaries and test alternatives. RECOMMENDATION 1 - does not have a matching number. The area classification is Desegregation. The data used for the evaluation was located in the historical records in the Transportation Department. 10 Program Description: Purpose: Scope and Content: Panicipants/Beneficiaries: Program Goals: Evaluation Criteria: Evaluation Results: Objective 1.0 IN-DEPTI-l PROGRAM EVALUATION Non-Desegregation Contingencies Those activities concerned with maintaining a funding reserve for future operations as well as unforeseen events. The contingency fund is a reserve of funds established to provide for emergencies and expenditures that cannot be foreseen at the time of budget preparation. The contingency fund process entails the solicitation and securement of financial and other resources that may be necessary during the fiscal year to provide complete and adequate support for the District's schools and administrative sites. The contingency fund is established during the budget process based upon input from the Board, staff, and community. The allocation to fund or not fund the contingency is approved by the Board of Directors. All students and employees in the District benefit, either directly or indirectly, should the reserve become necessary to fund emergency situations or unforeseen expenditures. To provide a pool of reserve funding. 1.1 Fund balance at any point in time. 1.2 Transfer of funds. 1.1 Monthly financial reports and corresponding historical revenue and expenditure data. 1.2 Internally generated forms supporting any transfers required. To maintain a source to fund future and/or unforecasted events. I I I I I I I I I I In-Depth Program Evaluation Non-Desegregation Contingencies Page 2 Discussion 1.0 The District's monthly internal reporting format is structured to predict, based on certain historical data, the projected ending fund balance. Even though the past is being used to predict the future, a certain degree of continuity does exist. Current political events, as well as day-to-day operational happenings, must also be factored into this future projection equation. Although it is impossible to obtain the actual fund balance until all year end activities have been completed, a projection system such as we use certainly goes a long way in helping to spot trends and make sound decisions. Obstacles to Goal Obtainment: Objective I. 0: Recommendation I: Objective 1: Evaluation Criteria: Expected Benefits: This objective was not achieved due to the elimination of a budget allocation by the Board of Directors. However, the strategies to obtain the goal are an on-going process in order to maintain historical data on which to base future budgeting decisions. Continue to expand the historical data base used to summarize the past so the future can better be predicted. To maintain a reliable reporting structure for the District's fund balance (reserve pool). The objective will be evaluated mathematically based on the accuracy of the monthly projections to the actual ending balance. The District will have a more complete and broader data base on which to make future projections and decisions regarding the budget and contingency planning. Program Description DATA PROCESSING SERVICES PROGRAM EVALUATION 1 ::\nr To provide the resources (Hardware, Software, Training, Programming, Computer Operations, Hardware and Software Support) necessary to collect, store and report information on LRSD students. Information Services will provide the computer resources necessary to collect, store, and report student information in a timely and accurate manner. School and central officebased staff, parents, and students will benefit from accurate up-to-date information on students. Information Services also supports all LRSD corporate business functions and classroom technology infrastructure needs. Purpose Provide effective, efficient information service support to LRSD. Scope and Content Plan, develop, implement and maintain the telecommunications, computing and miscellaneous information services for: 1. LRSD corporate business functions\n2. LRSD student administrative functions\n3. LRSD desegregation reporting functions\n4. Classroom technology infrastructure needs. Participants/Beneficiaries 1. Each student, LRSD. 2. Each employee, LRSD. 3. Each school, LRSD. 4. Each staff agency, LRSD 5. Board of Directors, LRSD. 6. Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Program Goals To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Evaluation Criteria 1.0 Information is available in a timely manner for planning and decision making. 1.1 Appropriate hardware is available and functiona, as designed. 1.2 Appropriate software is available and functional to meet the needs of the district. 1.3 Appropriate telecommunications systems are functioning to meet the needs of the District. Evaluation Results 1.0 No, information is not available in a timely manner. 1.1 No, appropriate hardware is not available. 1.2 No, appropriate software is not available. 1.3 No evaluation results. I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I . I ' I I I I I ' I I I I I I Objective 1 To provide the necessary informational services that ensure appropriate planning and decisionmaking processes. Discussion Objectives have not been achieved. LRSD has no comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan. This lack of a comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan has significant negative input on LRSD's ability to meet goals/objectives. To use an analogous situation, suppose the decision was made to rebuild Chicot Elementary. No architect is hired\ninstead the librarian is given money to rebuild the library, food service is given money to rebuild the cafeteria, and each teacher is given money to rebuild his/her classroom. The probable result would be an excellent library, an excellent cafeteria and excellent individual classrooms. Unfortunately, Chicot would consist of multiple buildings, none connected to the other, no hallways, no lockers, no rest rooms etc., etc. In summary a new, expensive, Chicot Elementary would be nonfunctional. LRSD information infrastructure is currently comparable to this hypothetical new, expensive but nonfunctional Chicot Elementary. Currently, each school and staff agency spends considerable money to meet their specific automation needs. Personal computers, printers, fax machines, modems, etc., with a multitude of software applications have been purchased and installed. No comprehensive plan for connectivity, standardization, maintenance, etc. has been followed. Data/information now resides in multiple locations in multiple formats. There are no \"hallways\" connecting these diverse automation islands. LRSD will probably survive without one elementary school, however, an information infrastructure connects/encompasses all LRSD schools, staff agencies and activities. Obstacles to Goal Attainment 1. LRSD Information Services staff is not trained or staffed for current technology. 2. LRSD lacks an inadequate information services infrastructure. 3. LRSD lacks a comprehensive Information Services budgeting and procurement strategy/plan. 4. LRSD has not correctly implemented current technology. 5. LRSD has no global corporate data model. 6. LRSD has not acquired the correct tools for efficient ad-hoc reporting. 7. LRSD employees are not trained on current technical tools. 8. LRSD Instructional Resource Center is not staffed or trained for current technology. 9. LRSD has no comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan. Recommendations Develop a comprehensive Information Services plan for LRSD. -Business cases to address obstacles to goal attainment will be prepared as a part of LRSD budget-planning process. Program Description DATA PROCESSING PROGRAM EVALUATION To provide the resources (Hardware, Software, Training, Programming, Computer Operations, Hardware and Software Support) necessary to collect, store and report information on LRSD students. Information Services will provide the computer resources necessary to collect, store, and report student information in a timely and accurate manner. School and central officebased staff, parents, and students will benefit from accurate up-to-date information on students. Information SeNices also supports all LRSD corporate business functions and classroom technology infrastructure needs. Purpose Provide effective, efficient information service support to LRSD. Scope and Content Plan, develop, implement and maintain the telecommunications, computing and miscellaneous information services for: 1. LRSD corporate business functions\n2. LRSD student administrative functions\n3. LRSD desegregation reporting functions\n4. Classroom technology infrastructure needs. Participants/Beneficiaries 1. Each student, LRSD. 2. Each employee, LRSD. 3. Each school, LRSD. 4. Each staff agency, LRSD 5. Board of Directors, LRSD. 6. Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Program Goals To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Evaluation Criteria 1.A ( Administration has received all required reports for the school year). 1.8 ( All data is accurately stored and is retrievable). 1.C (Quality reports are being delivered on time). 1.0 (Complaints are no longer being received about information not available). 1.1 (Reports are available which accurately report dropout). 1.2 (All test results are stored in the computer and are reflected in pertinent reports). 1.3 (All available student achievement data is stored and reported as requested). 1.4 (Attendance data is accurately stored and reported to the state with minimum manual compilation). 1.5 (Discipline data is accurately entered and reported as required). 1.6 (Student assignment data is stored and all reporting requirements are met). 2. (The District requirements for computer resources are being met). 2.1 (All employees requiring access to student records have access to terminals) . 2.1.A (The computer system has the capacity-disk, memory, print, speed, and processor speed meet peak demands). 2.1.B (At present time, the performance and monitoring tools that were implemented are being evaluated). 2.2 (All necessary software is installed and functioning properly to collect, store and report information in a timely and accurate manner). Evaluation Results 1.A No, report backlog frequently exists. 1.B No, data is not easily retrievable cannot ascertain if it is accurately stored. 1.C No, reports are of poor quality and not timely. 1.D No, complaints reference information availability are still received. 1.1 No evaluation results. 1.2 No evaluation results. 1.3 No evaluation results. 1.4 No, manual intervention is excessive. 1.5 No, reporting is cumbersome. 1.6 No, reporting is cumbersome. 2.0 No, LRSD computing resources are not adequately addressed. 2.1 No evaluation results. 2.1.A No, computing resources are not adequate. 2.1.B 2.2 No, software does not properly collect, store and report information in a timely and accurate manner. Objective 1 Data Processing (Information Services Department) will provide the necessary support for all school and central office based functions. Objective 2 Data Processing Department (Information Services Department Staff) will have the capacity to respond to District needs as required by District goals and state and federal laws such as grade distribution and the ability to identify students and cohorts of students. Discussion Objectives have not been achieved. LRSD has no comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan. This lack of a comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan has significant negative input on LRSD's ability to meet goals/objectives. To use an analogous situation, suppose the decision was made to rebuild Chicot Elementary. No architect is hired\ninstead the librarian is given money to rebuild the library, food service is given money to rebuild the cafeteria, and each teacher is given money to rebuild his/her classroom.  The probable result would be an excellent library, an excellent cafeteria and excellent individual classrooms. Unfortunately, Chicot would consist of multiple buildings, none connected to the other, no hallways, no lockers, no rest rooms etc., etc. In summary a new, expensive, Chicot Elementary would be nonfunctional. LRSD information infrastructure is currently comparable to this hypothetical new, expensive but nonfunctional Chicot Elementary. Currently, each school and staff agency spends considerable money to meet their specific automation needs. Personal computers, printers, fax machines, modems, etc., with a multitude of software applications have been purchased and installed. No comprehensive plan for connectivity, standardization, maintenance, etc. has been followed. Data/information now resides in multiple locations in multiple formats. There are no \"hallways\" connecting these diverse automation islands. LRSD will probably survive without one elementary school, however, an information infrastructure connects/encompasses all LRSD schools, staff agencies and activities. Obstacles to Goal Attainment 1. LRSD Information Services staff is not trained or staffed for current technology. 2. LRSD lacks an inadequate information services infrastructure. 3. LRSD lacks a comprehensive Information Services budgeting and procurement strategy/plan. 4. LRSD has not correctly implemented current technology. 5. LRSD has no global corporate data model. 6. LRSD has not acquired the correct tools for efficient ad-hoc reporting. 7. LRSD employees are not trained on current technical tools. 8. LRSD Instructional Resource Center is not staffed or trained for current technology. 9. LRSD has no comprehensive Information Services strategy/plan. Recommendations Develop a comprehensive Information Services plan for LRSD. Business cases to address obstacles to goal attainment will be prepared as a part of LRSD budget planning process. IN-DEPTH PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description: Facilities service includes resources to identify, plan and execute maintenance/repair programs equitably so that Little Rock School District students can receive efficient, functional and effective education. Specifically, facilities includes maintenance programs to maintain/repair all District facilities in an equitable condition commensurate with financial resources and District priorities. Purpose: The purpose operation's necessary to critical as management. Scope and Content: of the Facilities Program is part of the base costs to maintain the buildings and grounds support the educational mission. This program is it encompasses all aspects of real property The Facilities Program encompasses the repair of all existing facilities, grounds and other real property, the maintenance thereof, new construction to support academic initiatives, all real estate actions to include leases, purchasing of property, selling of property, easements, grants, rights-of-way and licenses. It is extended to include the base operation costs of utility payments covering electric, water, gas, refuse, entomology and any other miscellaneous services. It includes long-range planning, responsibilities with regard to new construction, maintenance, acquisition and closing of facilities. Participants/Beneficiaries: The Facilities Program is a base operations program that supports all persons that work for the Little Rock School District, are educated by its programs, or visit its facilities. Program Goals: To equitably maintain and repair facilities to support academic programs, student enrollment and administrative support, the Little Rock School District is comrni tted to insure for all students equitable educational facilities and schools which are located in lower socio-economic areas shall receive attention and resources at least equal to those in more affluent areas in the District. l Evaluation Criteria: The evaluation criteria for the objectives listed in the Facilities Program consists principally of historical records indicating requests and completions of maintenance and repair work. The evaluation criteria is geared.specifically to the objectives as outlined in the Desegregation Plan, Court Orders and ODM Reports. They do not require a relative measure of success, but merely to report numbers of requests made and completions and the percent thereof. Evaluation Results: There is no measurable scale of success against which the evaluation can be made. The objectives reported in the Facilities Program Budget Document, as stated previously, merely report the percent of completion of requests made of the Facilities Program. There is no set goal that can be equated to measure this quantity. The amount of work completed has too many variables to establish a set percent to be achieved in any given reporting period. This is due to the complexity of the requests, the nature of the requests, the total number and the resources allocated to complete that goal, coupled with the priority. Objective U: To maintain all school facilities such that they are in a safe, operational condition, and to repair, as necessary, commensurate with resources. Discussion #1: The overall level of success indicates that we have met our objective on all reporting periods. It is to be reasonably expected that the percent completed of the items listed under \"Strategies\" will vary commensurate with the amount of work and the resources allocated these initiatives. Since there is no measure of success or pre-determined percent which must be completed, one can only assume that all work that could reasonably be accomplished during the reporting period was done so, and all uncompleted work will carry forth to the next reporting period. Objective t2: The capacities of junior high schools will be reviewed in light of needed programs. Such capacities will then be revised as necessary. Discussion #2: This objective was met in 1993 and later evaluated in 1994. It will be recommended that this objective be deleted from the Program Budget Document. Objective #3: Concrete walks and macadam drives will be in good repair. Discussion #3: This is a subjective evaluation. The numbers of requests made, and the numbers completed, are what is reported. It is not possible to establish a desired level of completion because the work is received at various times during the reporting period such that the complexities of scheduling and allocated resources will vary the completion rate. Objective #4: New public address systems and bell systems will be placed in buildings where such items are not repairable. Discussion #4: Almost eighty percent (80%) of the requests made during the last reporting period have been completed. This is a program, like others, which is ongoing and which will be funded commensurate with approved funding levels. Objective #5: Any school which has portable buildings will have these buildings replaced with new units or repaired so that they will be in a condition suitable for use. Discussion #5: Sixty-two percent ( 62%) of the work requested of the Directorate was completed during the last reporting period. Objective #6: All school construction shall be subject to the Court's prior approval and shall promote desegregation. New construction must be approved by the Court. l Discussion #6: This is an ongoing strategy. There are no requirements pending at this time. There is no need for further evaluation of this objective. Objective #7: Modify building space to increase library capacities at Mitchell and Garland, purge the shelves of outdated, well-worn materials at Mitchell. Books most frequently used by the Four-Year Old Program, Kindergarten, and First Grades could be permanently placed in the individual classrooms since those grades are all housed in structures that are detached from the main building. Discussion #7: The portion of this objective allocated to the Facilities Program was completed in 1992. Objective #8: Franklin: Repair or replace the roof on each level of the building. Replace all ceiling tiles damaged by water leaks. Repaint interior walls as needed. Discussion #8: Most of these repairs have been completed. The ones that have been requested have been attended to. This building is scheduled for painting during School Year '94 - '95. Objective #9: Garland: Determine the feasibility of adding bathrooms on the second floor of the building. Increase the size of the Media Center and relocating the building's main entrance. Discussion #9: This assessment and report was completed and filed in 1992. No further evaluation is needed. Objective UO: Ish: Professionally evaluate the structural condition of the building and correct the many problems caused by the leaking roof. May be necessary to add a new slope roof. Unsightly classroom bathrooms would be repaired at once by those qualified to deal with asbestos. Exterior lighting should be repaired or replaced and the building's trim painted. Once the roof no longer leaks, the entire interior should be repainted. Discussion #10: This objective was completed and reported in October of 1992. Objective Ul: Mitchell: Correct the drainage problems and then replace the water-damaged carpeting in the GT room. Address the shortage of Media Center space, possibly by adding bookshelves to the second floor hallway near the Librarian's Office which is located in a kiosk area. Also consider adding more shelves to create storage space within existing Media Center. Discussion f 11: This requirement requires no further evaluation. It was completed in 1992. Objective #12: Rightsell: Eliminate the moisture problem at the school. Professionals with restoration experience involved to help solve problems of the final Playground should receive major improvements additional age appropriate equipment. Discussion -#12: should be building. including This objective does not require further evaluation since it has not been completed. Objective #13: Rockefeller: Install a new heating and cooling system if the effectiveness of the present system is not corrected by the recently-replaced room thermostats. Discussion #13: This assessment was made and the correction was completed in 1992. Objective -#14: Stephens: Stephens' objective is to be deleted since the school has been demolished. l Discussion #14: NIA Objective #15: All seven (7) incentive schools would benefit aesthetically from the addition of attractive landscaping. Once plantings are installed, the custodial staff should be trained in proper plant care. Many Little Rock School District schools have lost mature plantings to improper and over-zealous pruning by District workers, or from under-watering in times of summer heat and drought. Discussion #15: This is an ongoing problem. Guidance has been given the facilities. It will continue to be monitored. There is no level of success against which this objective can be measured. Objective #16: Give the incentive schools priority in the District sequencing of capital improvement projects since doublefunding does not cover capital improvements and maintenance. Buildings must be sound, attractive and well-maintained. Discussion #16: This objective was met when the capital improvements project was prioritized in 1990. Objective #17: The District has stated it would make adjustments to the Omaha Formula to meet the needs of buildings like McClellan that have special needs. Discussion #17: The custodial program is accountable by the Omaha Formula which is used by this District to proportion its custodial resources to its many facilities. This program is evaluated on a periodic basis. Every time there is an addition or  change to a major facility structure the custodial structure is re-examined. It was last reexamined in December of 1993. It was submitted to the District and approved. Adjustments were made. The custodial program, at the present time, has sufficient manpower resources to meet its permanent needs. Temporary custodial needs, however, must be addressed by a separate correspondence. Obstacles to Goal Attainment: There is one principal obstacle to the desired goal attainment of an equitable Facilities Program, and that is resources. The Plant Services Directorate is far below the national and regional averages, and as such, falls further behind as its backlog of maintenance and repair increases on a yearly basis. The amount of work identified district-wide to keep our buildings in a good state of repair, and at an educational standard to support our programs, is mounting every year. With level or decreased funding each year, the backlog continues to increase. It is only through a higher funding level that we will be able to maintain our facilities to meet our operational needs. Recommendations: The Facilities Program, as reported under the Program Budget document, provides no guidance nor equitable measure to the Superintendent or Board of Directors on the success of the Facilities Program. This is something that is not measurable. The bulk of the Facilities Program is reacting to requests made by Facility Managers. As those requests are made, they are prioritized and they are funded. The addition of funds and resources would most assuredly allow more work to be accomplished by having it first identified, scheduled, and then completed. Without the resources to further identify additional work, it is not possible to identify how much work could be scheduled, and hence completed, thereby determining additional resources. Many of the items in the Facility Program Budget Document have been completed, and it has been recommended that they be deleted from this program. Recommendation #1: My recommendation would be to restructure the way the School District assesses its facilities. The bottom-line effort of the Little Rock School District is two-fold: 1) To maintain all of its facilities in a safe and orderly fashion to meet the goals of its educational program. 1 l DCE/rlh/pe 2) To insure that the resources allocated the Plant Services Director are equitably spent such that no schools are given favoritism for resources over others. The establishment of the priority system, which is in place at the Plant Services Directorate, insures that this happens. It is only through outside pressures and perception of conditions in the past that the Facilities Program of equitable spending is sometimes off-balance. I would recommend that additional resources be given the Plant Services Directorate, such that they approximate at least the regional or national average of the CWE per school district to allow it to maintain its facilities to meet the goals as stated above. A business case recommendation is budgetary impact. is recommended. The overall likely to have an increase in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1) The program being evaluated as outlined in the desegregation portion of the Program Budget Document specifically identifies i terns in the Desegregation Plan and Court Orders and ODM Reports that do not give an overall view of the Facilities Program. The Program Budget Document merely responds to specific areas of concern and does not adequately see nor measure the Facilities Program. The Facilities Program is general engineering support to the entire district. As stated on page one of this document, it encompasses all aspects of the engineering program to support the many facilities. It goes far beyond seventeen (17) specific items as outlined in the Budget Document. 2) The data that has been used to analyze this program is simply a tally of work order requests as made by the Facilities' Managers and as recorded by the Plant Services Directorate. All recommendations listed here are considered in the support area. 3) There are no desegregation funds allotted the program under the Little Rock School District budget. This is not a prudent area to be reported, nor commented on for the purposes of monetary programming. DCE/rlh/pe Program Name: Family Life Education (New Futures) EXTENDED EVALUATION DESEGREGATION PROGRAMS Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis 2 Secondary Leader(s): Linda Young Rene' Carson PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The Family Life Education Program was implemented eight years ago to address the teen pregnancy problem in the Little Rock School District. An educational program was written and begun in the seventh grade eight years ago. Two specialists were hired to teach the junior high program. A module for grades 4-6 was written and begun in five schools. A K-3 program was later written and begun. The staff had increased to four elementary specialists and two junior high specialists at that time. currently, all of the Incentive Schools participate in the program along with the seven area schools and two magnet schools. The staff now consists of two elementary specialists, two junior high specialists, and a half-time coordinator. Purpose: The Family Life Education Program was designed to give the students of our District the correct information regarding their reproductive health, strategi~s to raise self-esteem, help formulate decision-making skills, and develop a feeling of individual importance. Scope and Content: The Family Life Education Program in the District (grades 4-7) has a spiraling curriculum. Each year the program has the following outline: I. Self-esteem II. Decision-making skills III. Communication skills IV. Reproductive Health V. Pregnancy and Birth (7th grade only) Participants/Beneficiaries: All seventh grade students in the District participate in the Family Life Education program through the seventh grade science class. The material is offered in a three week block of instructional time and is taught by two specialists who have received training. There are approximately 2500 seventh grade students served by this program. All incentive schools (five) are involved with the program, along with two magnet schools and eight area schools. Two thousand fourth and fifth grade students are served by the elementary program. PROGRAM GOALS: Family Life Education focuses on the developmental needs of children by addressing the areas of decision making skills, communication skills, self-esteem, and reproductive 3 heal th. The goal of the program is to help children make good decisions which will affect their future well-being. EVALUATION CRITERIA: The program's overall goal is long term. A reduction of or no increase in the number of pregnancies occurring in the district is an ideal goal. Overall good decision making skills shown by the students at school reflects on whether the program has had an impact on students. EVALUATION RESULTS: Evaluation results are based on results reported from Health Services. Objective l.: To provide Family Life Education for the Incentive Schools in grades l.-6 as a part of their Health and Physical Education Program. Discussion l.: Family Life Education is currently being taught in fifth and sixth grades in all of the Incentive Schools. Due to a reduction in staff only fifth and sixth grades could continue to receive instruction. Last year there were no elementary pregnancies in the Incentive Schools. Prior to 1991.-92 there were 15 elementary pregnancies reported by the school nurses. During the 92-93, 93-94 school years, only 2 elementary pregnancies have been reported. Objective 2: To provide Family Life Education for other targeted schools in the Little Rock School District. (7 area schools and two magnet schools) Discussion 2: Nine other schools are involved in the Family Life Program. Carver and King are the two magnet schools that are involved. King was added at semester last year. The area schools are Baseline, Watson, Geyer Springs, Cloverdale, Wilson, Terry, and Fulbright. Two specialists teach the program in all of these schools. Last year there was one elementary pregnancy in the nine school which this program serves. There were three pregnancies reported among students in these schools during the 90-93 school years. One of these students was raped and later reported this incident to the school nurse as a result of activities in Family Life class.The other students came to our District from other schools outside the District. Two of these students had not fully participated in our program. The nurses worked with these students and helped the each one receive necessary medical attention. 4 Objective 3: To provide Family Life Education in all of the Junior High Schools in the District through the seventh grade science classes. Discussion 3: All seventh grade students in the District receive instruction in the Family Life Education program through a three week module taught during their life science class. The classes are taught by two trained specialists. Pre-tests and post-tests have been given to students by the specialists each year since the program has been in operation. With very few exceptions, the students have scored higher on the post-test than the pre-test . Students have also written a verbal assessment of the program. Representative colllll\\ents from the students are as follows: \"Thanks for helping me understand some things about myself.\" \"I never knew about some of things we talked about, and I was embarrassed to talk to my parents about these things.\" \"I appreciate being taught about how to think about making good decisions.\" \"I am glad we had special teachers, I think it would have been hard to ask my regular teacher about sex and stuff. They might think I was bad or something.\" Comments from teachers: \"I don't think I could have taught this material to my students. I am not up-to-date on the information needed for this class. The students ask so many questions that are really specific. I would hate to give them the wrong information. It was probably best that a specialist came and taught my classes. I was able to observe my students and help with the class. I also learned a great deal about the human body.\" \"Thank goodness for special teachers. I am not comfortable teaching this topic. I probably would not have done a very good job because this topic is very difficult to teach.\" \"Our students need this program. I am glad that the District has made a commitment to have special teachers, nurses, and counselors work with our students with issues such as l 5 decision-making, and emotional and physical changes.\" Obstacles to Goal Attainment Objective l: This objective was met for three years, however, due to a budget deficit the staff was reduced. Currently, only the fifth and sixth grades classes continue to be served by specialists. These specialists do not have the time to serve the remaining fifty (50) K- 4 cl~sses along with the classes in the other nine schools. The counselors and nurses have received some training in the area of Family Life Education and were supposed to help teach the curriculum in the lower grades. Many of the counselors and nurses have not set aside the amount of time to teach the program as the specialists did when they were assigned to teach in the lower grades. The continuity of the program is not as evident as it was in the past when the same specialist saw the students over a period of time. The specialists worked closely with counselors and nurses in identifying younger children in possible child abuse situations. The Heal th Advisory Committee of New Futures has proposed an after school program to address postponing sexual involvement or those students targeted as \"at risk\" students. \"At risk\" students have low grades/self-esteem or have mothers who became pregnant as teens or have teenage siblings with babies. The program has not been initiated, but members of the committee have attended a training session. The program will hinge on volunteer efforts and students choosing to participate in the after school program. Objective 2: This objective was reached for three years. Two magnet schools and seven area schools continue to be served by the Family Life Education program. However, due to budget cuts and staff reduction, the services in these schools have also been reduced to just the fifth and sixth grade students. King Magnet School was added to the program last year because many of the students who were attending Ish Elementary enrolled at King. The counselor and nurse participate on a limited basis with the Family Life teacher. Due to the limited availability of the nurse, the problems encountered by the counselors, a complete and thorough program is not always taught in the lower grades. The nurses and counselors have both been involved in staff development 6 regarding family life education, but they often become involved in other school programs which take priority. Objective 3: The program in the junior high schools continues to be taught by two trained specialists. The program continues to be part of the LRSD science curriculum. Every student is held responsible for the program's objectives and is tested on all of the material. Teachers have continually praised our teachers for the excellent program and the professional way the classes are taught. Many have expressed appreciation for the program. Recommendations Recommendation 1: Reinstating the program to grades K-4 would be the most desirable recommendation for the Incentive Schools, but under the current budget constraints this is not a feasible suggestion. Since many of the students in these schools could benefit from attending classes where decision making skills, problem-solving skills, and discussions regarding reproductive health are discussed, implementing the program being studied by the Adolescent Health Advisory Committee and continuing the staff development program offered for the nurses and counselors would be the best recommendation .. Objective 1: Adding personnel to the Family Life Education staff would allow all classes in the Incentive Schools to receive the entire Family Life Education program. Since increasing the staff would cause an increase in the budget for the total program, adding personnel is not an option. Implementing the after school program and expanding staff development opportunities for the nurses and counselors is the best solution for this objective. Evaluation Criteria 1: Continuing to see an extremely low pregnancy rate among the students in these schools would be one effective criteria to use to evaluate the students exposed to our program. Having the students and teachers evaluate our program at the end of the year would give us some input about what the students and teachers think about and want from the program~ Expected Benefits 1: Preventing any child from an early pregnancy would benefit the child, family, District, and State. The AFDC benefits per child per year in the State is $2,290. From birth to 18 years the state spends $41,423 per child. Long term savings would be much greater. ------------------------ 7 Impact Analysis: Desegregation (Desegregation Plan, April 29, 1992, p.156) This recommendation will assist the district in continuing to meet its obligation under the Desegregation Plan. Resource Analysis: The combined salary of the two specialists who teach the program in the Incentive Schools (but also teach in area/magnet schools) totals $58,561 plus travel expenses. Approximately another $2000 is spent on office supplies and copy expenses. The salary of the half-time coordinator is $22, 982. The total salary of the elementary specialists represent approximately 42% of the total salary budget of $137,690 for the Family Life Program. Force Field Analysis: The primary supporters of this program are the parents, teachers, administrators, nurses, and counselors in the school. General Implementation Plan: Ideally, returning this program to the full level of implementation would be an asset for the students in the Incentive Schools. Realistically, budget constraints prohibits this option. Retaining the program at its present level in all of the Incentive Schools is better than elimination of the program. More training needs to done with the counselors and nurses in the area of Family Life Education. This will be done during the spring semester. Recommendation 2: The program in the two magnet schools and the nine area schools should be maintained at the current level of service. Continuing service at the current schools would keep some consistency for the students currently enrolled. Objective 2: Program at the two magnet schools and the nine area schools should at least be maintained at the current level of service. Counselors and nurses need further training in the Family Life Education program and should document the time spent teaching the objectives of the program. This training will be done during the spring semester. Evaluation Criteria 2: Maintaining an extremely low to zero pregnancy rate in the elementary schools would be the ideal criteria. Teachers 8 and students could evaluate the program using a very specific questionnaire. Expected Benefits: Preventing any child from an early pregnancy would benefit the child, family, District, and State. The AFDC benefits per child per year in the State is $2,290. From birth to 18 years the state spends $41,423 per child. Long term savings would be much greater. Impact Analysis: The program in the magnet and area schools is not part of the Desegregation Plan. However, many of the schools have listed the program as part of their school improvement plans. Resources Analysis: The two specialists who teach the program in the Incentive Schools also teach the program in the magnet and area schools. The combined salary of these two specialists total $58,561 plus travel. This is approximately 42% of the total Family Life budget of $137,690. The junior high specialists also teach in three of the area schools. One week each month, the junior high specialists teach in the elementary schools. One-fourth of the salaries of the junior high specialists is $14,036. The total salaries for the complete elementary program is $72,597 or 52% of the total Family Life salary budget of $137,690. Office supplies and copy cost still fall within the $2000 amount listed in objective 1. Force Field Analysis: The primary supporters of this program are the parents, teachers, administrators, nurses, and counselors in the school. Recommendation 3: The Family Life Education program has been a strong component of the seventh grade science program and should continue to be taught by specialists. The two specialists have been able to maintain a strong and upto- date program. Continuation of this program with the current delivery system is very important. The program/content would be eliminated or possible taught incorrectly/improperly if the program is turned over to the regular classroom teacher. Objective 3: This program should be maintained at the current level of support. Two specialists I 9 are employed to teach the classes in all the seventh grade science classes in the District. The two specialists teach approximately 2500 students. Evaluation Criteria 3: Keeping the teen pregnancy rate at a low level would help support the idea that Family Life Education has had an impact on the decision-making processes for the junior high teen. The program will continue using the survey form for both the students and teachers. Expected Benefits: Preventing any student from dropping out of school due to an unexpected pregnancy would be a cost effective benefit. Arkansas ranks very high among states in teen pregnancy statistics. The overall goal for this portion of the New Futures Program is to reduce the pregnancy rate among our students. The chart of statistics for pregnancies in our district shows that the number of pregnancies last year was the lowest in seven years. Our program is now seven years old. Impact Analysis: Postponing sexual activity or preventing an early pregnancy would have an impact on the district as well as the State. Reducing the number of cases of sexually transmitted diseases, teen pregnancies, or the number of low birth weight babies which later becomes a burden on State welfare roles could be an ~conomic factor which needs to be considered. The AFDC benefits per child per year in the State is $2,290. From birth to 18 years the state spends $41,423 per child. Long term savings would be much greater. Resources Analysis: The salary of the two specialists who teach the program in all of our junior high schools plus four other elementary schools totals $56,147 plus travel. Seventy-five (75%) percent of this salary or $42, 110 can be designated as salary expense for the time spent in the junior high schools. The salary for the half-time coordinator is \\$22,982. Office expenses for media, copy cost, and printing of classroom materials is approximately $4,000. 10 Force Field Analysis: The parents, teachers, administrators, nurses, and counselors in the schools are very supportive of the program. To place this program in the hands of the regular classroom teacher could be disastrous. There would not be sufficient control over what is said by the instructor, what videos are shown, or what is allowed to be discussed in the class. This could cause the program to be destroyed. Many of our students would never receive the correct information about their reproductive health, and the myths about sexual behavior will continue to be perpetuated among our teens. I Grade/Race 5th grade African-American 5th grade/White 6th grade African-American 6th grade/White - 7th grade African-American 7th grade/White 8th grade African-American 8th grade/White 9th grade African-American 9th grade/White 10th grade African-American 10th grade/White 11th grade African-American 11th grade/White 12th grade African-American 12th/White Total LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PREGNANCY STATISTICS 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 3 2 3 2 * * 0 0 * * 7 8 * * 0 l 56 82 25 20 * * l l * * 31 40 * * 2 5 * * 60 56 * * 6 7 133 146 54 38 * * 7 4 * * 39 42 * * 13 8 186 230 248 232 91-92 92-93 93-94 l 0 0 0 5 0 l 0 0 0 3 8 5 0 0 l 18 20 17 0 0 l 32 35 29 3 3 2 38 51 27 4 5 5 38 48 30 5 7 6 27 44 38 8 8 12 181 230 174 * For the 87-88, 88-89 years - pregnancy statistics not recorded by grade and ethnic groups. 11 12 General Implementation Plan: Beginning in January, 1995, the following activities will occur: Date January, 1995 May, 1995 June, 1995 August, 1995 Sept., 1995 Activity Staff development for Nurses and Counselors Survey teachers, nurses, counselor, and students about issues in the FLE program staff development for specialists, UAMS (no cost) Begin program in schools Staff development for nurses and counselors Persons Responsible Family Life Ed. Staff Family Life Ed. Staff Coordinator of FLE Family Life Ed. Staff Family Life Ed. Staff I 13  Business Case is recommended __ yes no  Plan modification is recommended _yes __ no  overall recommendations are likely to have what type of budgetary impact: No budgetary impact Increased costs - Decreased costs Purpose FEDERAL PROGRAMS PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description The Office of Federal Programs is a department of the Division of Curriculum and Learning Improvement. Compensatory and support services are provided to students by funds secured through federal, state and other agencies. Scope and Content Program operations are categorized in two broad areas. First, the department develops, implements, monitors and evaluates programs: Chapter 1, ESEA, 1965 - Amended 1994 Chapter 2, ESEA, 1965 - Amended 1994 State Compensatory Education Programs Act, 1990 Eisenhower Math/Science Education Act, 1982 - Amended 1994 Chapter 1, ESEA is the centerpiece of programs in the department. All program services are designed to provide a range of needs and contribute specifically to that effort in areas of early intervention, supplementary reading/language arts and mathematics, and parental involvement. For some students, funding programs contribute to opportun\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1216","title":"Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Planning, Research and Evaluation: Extended Program Evaluations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1216"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nExhibit 310B\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS 1994-1995 2 of 2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATIONS 1994-1995 2 of 2 NEW FUTURES EXTENDED PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description Purpose New Futures Pagel In addition to the enrichment programs, Dunbar is a full participant in the New Futures for Little Rock Initiative. (The purpose of the New Futures junior high school restructuring initiative is to establish a school climate, culture and curriculum that is responsive to the developmental needs of early adolescent youth and the particular needs of at-risk students. ( Dunbar is not a participant of the program. This information was filed with the court in a motion to substitute language and provide updated information on May 13, 1993 and approved in a court order dated September 13, 1993. Scope and Content The program focuses on the development and implementation of (1) school restructuring which engages teachers and administrators in the long-term process of expanding their thinking and engage in basic and fundamental changes around issues that affect how they teach and support all students utilizing site-based management, (2) developing and implementing middle school practices and programs, (3) developing and implementing specific intervention programs and practices for at-risk youth through school improvement which may be based on the Effective Schools research. Participants/Bene~iciaries This program impacts the total school community including teachers, students, staff administrators, and parents at each New Futures school. The schools participating in this program are Cloverdale Junior High, Forest Heights Junior High, Pulaski Heights Junior High, and Southwest Junior High School. Program Goa.l I The first goal of the New Futures program is to assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Specific objectives have been developed in order to specify what is to be accomplished to implement this goal. New Futures Page 2 1. Two heterogenous, interdisciplinary student teams that share a common group of teachers, common space, and common blocks of instructional time for 7th, 8th, and 9th grade students will be established. 2. Incentive programs and partnerships with community businesses to encourage and reward achievement, attendance, and good citizenship will be developed and implemented. 3. Homework Centers will be operational through the After School Program. 4. Tutoring opportunities will be available to students needing assistance through the After School Program. 5. In-school suspension programs will be developed and implemented as an alternative disciplinary response to suspendable actions. Evaluation Criteria The evaluation for the New Futures program will consist of: 1. Student team rosters, identifying team names, agendas, and participant evaluations. 2. Team documentation will reflect program implementation and numbers of students involved. 3. Student participation rosters, implementation of hotline program. 4. Student participation rosters. 5. Alternative disciplinary response to suspendable actions. Evaluation Results Evaluation results reflect data gathered from various sources. These data have been compiled and analyzed and provide the following results, presented in correspondence with each previously stated objective. Objective 1 Two heterogenous, interdisciplinary student teams that share a common group of teachers, common space, and common blocks of instructional time for 7th, 8th, and 9th grade students will be established. New Futures Page 3 At each participating school, the master schedule was developed to provide for two heterogeneous student teams at each grade level. Registrars provided a team roster to each team leader at the beginning of the academic year. No team is 100\\ pure referring to the fact that there are approximately 10-30 students out of a total of 120-150 students on each team that one or more classes on both teams. Each school is designated into team geographic areas either by floor, ramp, or wing. These teams have all the core team classes within a small geographic area. Student team lockers are assigned within this team geographic area. Students move out of the team area for related arts classes and lunch. Team areas are decorated with the team name, bulletin boards, calendar, logo, or theme. All teams have team names, logos, Tshirts, and other identifying strategies. Examples of team names are the WOW team (7th grade:PHJli)\nSkyriders team (7th grade:PHJli)\nPirates team (7th grade:SWJli)\nRed Hots (6th grade:FHJli). See attachment l. Teams have a common planning period each day in which to meet together to discuss student problems, hold joint parent conferences, meet with individual students, develop interdisciplinary units of instruction, and to develop incentive programs for students. All teams maintain team agendas/minutes to serve as a record of their activity. See attachment 2. Steering Committees were established as a way to enhance the teacher leadership being developed through teaming and as a way to begin the practice of effective shared decision making at the local level. Comprehensive training was provided to steering committee members, assistant principals, and principals. Models and decision making models and flow charts were provided as guides in the process. Steering committees maintained minutes and established a self-assessment process to guide the work and process. See attachment 3. During the 1993-1994 school year, staff development activities were conducted to assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Evaluations of each activity were completed and compiled for review. Participant feedback was positive with 99\\ of the evaluations expressing complete satisfactions with the activity. See attachment 4. Date 7/23/93 Topic Strategic Imperatives _of Restructuring (5 days) Personnel Selected Staff 9/23/93 8/9/93 8/10/93 8/12/93 9/14/93 8/3/93 8/12/93 8/12/93 8/12/93 10/8/93 10/13/93- 12/01/93 10/14/93 10/19/93 10/20/93 10/27/93 11/9/93- 11/10/93 12/14/93- 12/15/93 School-Based Decision Making (3 days) Leadership Training Designing Knowledge Work for Student Success (2 days) Writing Process (2 days) Integration of Skills Understanding At-Risk Youth (2 days) Cooperative Discipline ((2 days) Developing and Implementing Peer Mediation Programs (2 days) Developing and Implementing Advisor/Advisee Programs (2 days) Making Language Meaningful (2 days) On-site technical assistance ( 4 days) Reading Process and Semantic Webbing School Based Decision Making School Based Decision Making Process Communications ( 2 days) Designing Knowledge Work Designing Knowledge Work New Futures Page 4 s t e e r i n g Committees Team Leaders All Staff L e a r n i n g Foundations staff L e a r n i n g Foundations staff Selected Staff Selected Staff Selected Staff Selected Staff Selected Staff L e a r n i n g Foundations staff Selected Staff Principals Assistant Principals Selected Staff Selected Staff Selected Staff 11/10/93 11/7/93 1/18/94 1/19/94- 2/23/94 2/15/94 1-/27/94 3/10/94- 3/11/94 4/5/94- 4/8/94 4/15/93- 4/16/93 School Based Decision Making Collaborative Teaching on-site technical assistance ( 4 days) Designing Knowledge Work ( 6 days) Process Communications Making Language Meaningful Peer Coaching Implementing Peer Coaching Network Leadership Retreat New Futures Page 5 S t e e r i n g Committees Selected Staff Learning Foundations Staff Selected Staff Selected staff Selected Staff Selected Staff Selected Staff Principals, Ass't Principals Team Leaders Conference participation was provided for local school staff primarily through funding from New Futures for Little Rock Youth as follows: 8/14/93- 8/18/93 8/20/93 7/18/93- 7/24/93 11/4/93- 11/7 /93 3/10/94 4/27/94- 4/29/94 12/5/93 National Conference Selected Staff on Peer Mediation UALR Conference of Peer Selected Staff Mediation Middle Level Summer Selected Staff Institute Conference participation selected Staff and presentation at National Middle School Conf. Conference:Drugs,Gangs Selected Staff Violence and Guns Arkansas Middle Level Selected Staff Conference National Restructuring Board/Staff Conference Discussion 1 New Futures Page 6 The results indicate a 100\\ successful implementation of the objectives. A review of the data reveals that interdisciplinary teams functioned effectively. outcomes of teaming include an increase in parent conferences with several teams reporting more than 150 documented team/parent conferences\ndevelopment and implementation of interdisciplinary uni ts across teams and schools\nsite visits by school districts from across the state\npresentations and training provided to other school districts on interdisciplinary teaming\ngrant received by the Carnegie Foundation for one school through the middle grade school state policy initiative for schools who had successfully implemented most of the recommendations of Turning Points\norganizational structure well developed and initial capacity for replication developed\nknowledge gained through training and conference participation resulted in implementation of innovative programming and academic development in which student outcomes were improved\ncollegial support for organizational structure articulated by teachers, local school administrators, parents, and students. A climate that supports innovation, collaboration, and change has been established and reflects the developmental growth experienced i-n these schools. Objective 2 Incentive programs and partnerships with community businesses to encourage and reward achievement, attendance, and good citizenship will be developed and implemented. A Young Professionals Club at Southwest Junior High School was established in cooperation with AP\u0026amp;L Redfield Power Plant to achieve the following objectives: help each child develop a worthwhile self-image by helping he/she find their identity, help all students understand the concept of pride, reduce the number of suspensions, strengthen academic achievement in underachievers, and improve communication skills. The club is open to 7th grade Pirate team students and meets during lunch under the guidance of the Pirate teaching team. A total of 65 students (35 boys and 30 girls) participated. During the first nine weeks, there were zero suspensions for participating students. The third nine weeks there were a total of 3 suspensions for participating students. This program has received national and state recognition as a model program. The Breakfast Club was established by the Wings Team, an 8th grade team at Pulaski Heights Junior High. The club serves all 8th grade black male students. The club meets on a monthly basis during first period. The focus of the group was to raise self-esteem, serve as a mentoring program, and provide motivation to increase academic achievement. Community speakers were invited to present New Futures Page 7 to the group during each meeting. Students were involved in follow up discussion. Assistant principals reported that there was a noticeable decline in the number of disciplinary sanctions against black males since the beginning of the breakfast club. The number of failures was reduced from 7 black males in 1993 to l black male in 1994. This improvement reflects the goals of the Breakfast Club. A Peer Mediation Program was begun by the Wings Teams after receiving training in developing and implementing such a program. Twenty-seven students were trained as Peer Mediators. The students successfully mediated with approximately 110 students. The targeted groups of the program are the student mediators and the students involved in a dispute who participate in the mediation. The student mediators completed two full days of intensive training. In addition, they met with the project coordinators on a weekly basis to further define their skills and help promote the program in the school. These weekly sessions provided an avenue to process the mediations that had taken place so that concerns and weaknesses in the program could be addressed. This portion of the program was integrated into the After School Program. This type of program is nationally recognized as an effective way to reduce conflict and focus on violence prevention. Discussion 2 The interdisciplinary teams across the schools developed and implemented various unique incentive programs to encourage and reward achievement, attendance, and good citizenship. Generally, most teams designed the incentive programs for a nine week period. Teams involved parents by invi~ing them to special ceremonies and assemblies. Teams recognized improvement as well as achievement. Teams also developed extended incentive prograI!lllling and partnerships as the examples above describe. Teams worked with the Parent and Comm~~ity Involvement staff to identify students in need of special services and include their parents in the Family Support Net Progra~, TOUCH Program, GED Program, and HEAL Program. Over 180 students and their families have bee~ involved in these various programs. Teams identified students to participate in an innovative summer program for high risk youth. This program served a dual purpose: practicum experience for teachers on working with high risk adolescents and summer programming for identi~ied s~udents. These students are woven back into support programming such as the after school program, HEAL groups, and case management during the academic year. Objective 3 Homework Centers will be operational through the After School Program. New Futures Page 8 Student participation rosters were maintained for the after school program. Students participated in academic programming, high interest club activities, and the homework center. Transportation and a nutritional snack were provided. The program was operational three days weekly. See attachment 5. Implementation of a hotline program was not implemented as a city wide program is available to students each evening. Discussion 3 The after school program provided students with opportunities to receive additional academic instruction, access to research and reference materials, special enrichment experiences and participation in high interest club activities such Video News clubs, chess clubs, community service clubs, music and theatrical clubs. Transportation was provided for students in this program as well as a nutritional snack. Cloverdale participated with UCA in a teacher preparation program that was included into the after school program. Objective 4 Tutoring opportunities will be available to students needing assistance through the After School Program. Through the after school program, tutoring opportunities were developed and implemented for students. The primary areas of focus were math, reading, and writing skills. Before testing, students participated in test preparation sessions. Some peer tutoring was also included in the program. Discussion 4 The opportunity to receive additional instruction is needed and beneficial for many students. Many of the students in these schools do not have conducive study environments at home nor the support reference materials to complete certain assignments. This program provides at-risk students with an additional opportunity to achieve academic success. Objective 5 An in-school suspension program will be developed and implemented as an alternative disciplinary response to suspendable actions. As an intervention strategy to assist in keeping students in school and continuing their academic work, the in-school suspension program was developed and implemented for category one offenses. Processes have been established to facilitate the communication of student assignments between the teaching staff and the in-school suspension teacher. Quarterly records were maintained noting the New Futures Page 9 number of students assigned to the program, parent contacts and counselor conferences. Quarterly participation ranged from 66 - 143 students each nine weeks. See attachment 6. Discussion 5 The objectives of the in-school suspension program include helping students accept the consequences for their actions, evaluate his/her behavior, and to modify social performance. The program has been successful in keeping large numbers of students in school and continuing their academic work. Teachers and counselors have supported the program by sending assignments in a timely manner and by participating in conferences with students and parents when necessary. The number of repeaters is low compared to the number of students participating ( less than l0t). Ob~tacles to Goal Attainment Objective l The objective of establishing interdisciplinary student teams that share a common group of teacher, common space, and common blocks of instructional time was attained. The computer process used to schedule students onto teams does not provide adequate support for achieving a minimum of students assigned to both teams. Cross teaming of students presents certain programmatic difficulties. More flexibility in the scheduling process would assist in decreasing the problem. Objective 2 The objective of developing incentive programs and partnerships with community businesses to encourage and rewa:::-d achievement, attendance, and good citizenship was attained. Objective 3 The objective of operating homework centers through the After School Program was attained. Objective 4 The objective of providing tutoring opportunities to students needing assistance through the After School Program was attained. Objective 5 The objective of providing in-school suspension programs as an alternative disciplinary response to suspendable actions was attained. Program Goal 2 New Futures Page 10 The second goal of the program is to promote collaboration/ coordination between local school and other youth serving agencies in the community. The following objective was developed in order to specify what is to be accomplished to implement this goal. 1. A school-based case management system will be operational. Evaluation criteria 1. There will be an increased number of students receiving needed services reflected in case management data reports. Evaluation Results Objective 1 There will be an increased number of students -receiving needed services reflected in case management data reports. Since January 1991, New Futures for Little Rock Youth, in partnership with five youth-serving agencies and the Little Rock School District, has sponsored a pilot program that has offered Case Management services to high-risk youth attending targeted junior high schools in the Little Rock School District: Cloverdale, Forest Heights, Pulaski Heights, and Southwest junior highs. Discussion 1 A team of four Case Managers was formed at each school comprised of youth worker employed by community agencies with expertise in addressing problem areas faced by young people, including adolescent pregnancy and parenting, substance abuse, adolescent mental health, youth employment, and poverty. Executive directors of participating agencies and principals of participating schools meet monthly as an advisory, \"roundtable\" to oversee implementation strategies, monitor program activities, identify program strengths and weaknesses and make recommendations for improvements in service to youth and their families. A New futures staff person, the CMST Coordinator, is assigned to each school to organize the functioning of the CMST. See attachment 7. As of August 1~94, 75% (547 out of 734) of the youth who had received on-going case management services showed improved circumstances at case termination. During the 1993-1994 school year, almost 500 youth participated in 27 various school-based support groups, led or co-facilitated by Case Managers. Case New Futures Page 11 Managers organized 26 typed of special events involving 600 at-risk youth participating in the program during the 1993-94 school year. A report of New Futures goals and objectives for the program and results are included. See attachment 8. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Objective 1 The objective of providing more services to students through the case management system was attained. Recommendation 1 It is recommended that the efforts of the New Futures program be focused on maintaining and supporting the current programming at Cloverdale, Forest Heights, Pulaski Heights, and Southwest junior highs and expanding the focus of the program to include supporting and assisting in the development of the district wide middle school planning/implementation process. This recommendation would capitalize on the developed capacity at four junior high schools within the district to support a middle school transition and serve as a planned method of capturing and utilizing the existing resources that exist within the district to support future program efforts for adolescent age students and students at-risk. Objective The objective of this recommendation is to maximize existing capacity within the district at the four junior highs to support institutional change in the area of middle school organization. Evaluation Criteria Existing practices of maintaining team roster, team names, agendas, team documentation, and participant evaluations will be followed. Expected Benefits The District will maintain its collaborative efforts with New Futures while utilizing the benefits of the relationship and the resulting capacity development within the district to support a district wide program which supports school reform and benefits atrisk students. Impact Analysis New Futures Page 12 This recommendation will provide a plan for the district to sustain established capacity while developing a middle school organization across the district. It provides a framework for the district to continue to base planning program development on research and best practice. Resource Analysis The current resource allocation to the existing program will be sufficient to implement this recommendation. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters for this recommendations will be the local school staffs and New Futures Board of Directors. General Implementation Plan 1/95 4/95 4/95 5/95 9/95 - 6/96 Activity Utilize existing capacity to assist middle level planning Meet with principals to examine scheduling needs to maintain teaming Continue staff development efforts Work with data processing to provide support Continue existing programming and support middle school planning Person Responsible New Futures Liaison Selected teachers and principals New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison Principals New Futures Liaison Local school staff ' 1993 Interdisciplinary Teams Cloverdale Jr. High ~ 7 Wonders Untouchables P.A.w.s. Superstars Navigators AirFrosh Forest Heights ~ Red Hots Super 7's Wave News2 Gold Royals Green Royals Pulas~:i Heights ~ Skyriders w.o.w. Firecrackers Wings Superstars A Team Southwest Jr. High Team 7 S.A.I.L.S. Pirates Motionaires Terminators Super Novas Spurs nachaent 1 teau93 Team Leader Trish Poore Tammy Gullett Sue Smith Charles McFadden Nancy Hawking Bill Estes Team Leader Glenn Holloway Nancy Cross Ginger Tuck Leigh Cole Dan Drew Melinda Beggs Team Leader Sammy Grandy Ann Blaylock George Coleman Carol Kaffka Sam Steuart Wayne Knight Team Leader Sherry Lack Bettie Williford Chris Kline Jake Tidmore Charles Moore Jackie Falls Grade 7th 7th 8th 8th 9th 9th Grade 7th 7th 8th 8th 9th 9th Grade 7th 7th 8th 8th 9th 9th Grade 7th 7th 8th 8th 9th 9th I H!NUTES CF TE~H HEETI~G Ti:AM\n, .., Y,A~ (, ~J \\, ..... L . ~( : -1\\--i' ./ ,I IL.., '.  \\ -- , .. ' I ,f  \\ I )\n(,-fj TIHE rm, -~ef2-4-1T-i:-. _-) -,- ------- TEAM LEADER 1-i.....f, 1rj,. -_~c_ _ F RES ENT: L\\,~ I t(,-,,..~ ..\\. - r:,\\ 1 7  :{,-..,-1,-J t.-.C: .{ A c_ __ - -:(. , ...... \u0026gt; t,_, ... , y \\ -    J{..f 11,  1 ., lv _____ OTHERS PRSENT: ----------- -=.j.. -J_ ,)r_:...C_f I_?_/ _  ________ .J\\),z-,i-.,_~_j,{_ -,,_\u0026lt;JJ\"/\\. J.__,rr-c(!h. ( Ot,u'\\ ~~ (':-',,'\\.\n{{,cf.! ( -C L--::. -.__:,t_( ~ ... .,,e 1c .\"\\ \u0026amp; (,, ~('c, , ~A.,t c\\ G .,-., .. ~.4{\u0026amp;.  tcfF.. ,.., ~-i .c. ~.'lt?t ] ---------------------------------- - ------------------------------ --------------------------------- ---- - t\", ,.ll,J i :_.::, ,f L: r J C. .:.,1 1-1~:.i ihG ftff . .JJ ) #:9!/rf4 C/ ) Jo \u0026lt;{S-DATE TIME -.L..~'-\"-+'~\"--:--------- ~ l p / ------------------ OTHERS PRESE:HT: 11~ s (. v~ ~ ~~ c~ '. - ~r~~ ,: cO _t.fj::. cl, i.k Vr, ~\\, ho. .... , ~ry- -~~~.,\n::\n...\n...-....\n...-.\n._______,.,....~~--~-_,_ _. .\n_\\.-\"\"_~ (_ _\n_~-,,-\u0026lt;'\u0026gt;_ _\n...,~f~-1 ~-y,f- f#f.~\"', e,(:L))A..f- 6.. e-M 1ft cOl,R/r u L 1 lf --------------------------- --- ) SKYRIDER5 TEAM MEETING JANUARY 26, 1994 1 1 :00 A.M. / ROOM 307 AGENDA 1. MINUTES FROM HIE LAST MEETING c'.iJ...1,,\u0026lt;t lo..te. ~?cv\n.,-, c. aJ 2. STEERING C,OMMITTEE ME~TING ( TODAY )~ Ge~ C,.c,~t-J tr.a!:~ --~ :- St-\u0026gt;c~-=- c..1.o,-a.1cs it..1J'(:'u.Yi1T?,-s GFIY\\.(..~i r vs Cof'y\"-'\\_, O\"'o.-.J\u0026gt;rA- -,r,. :~ -~--.l,-,-L.:.~ - n,\n,, r~1c~. - Sc:c.: 1=, -Mf- . 3. ABOUT FACE ASSEMBLY - 4. DETENTION CENTER ASSEMBLY 5. BLACK HISTORY COMMITTEE 6. TARDY COMMITTEE 7. FUNDRA I SER pv-k . 8. ASSIGNMENT NOTEBOOKS 9. USE OF TEAM MONEY 10. INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING -Ceq~ tf 1~ 1 1. HOMEWORK BASH 111\n).Q OC\u0026gt; .ef-\n-{ ..,, , , 12. STUDENT CONFERENCES 13. OTHER ) MINUTES OF TEAM MEETING J/l d --z /,'rl) DATE ~,-,.- 'J. \n.I/ _j_ / TIME TEAM LEADER~ ___ .. MEMBERS PRESENT:~LO\"\"\"...,n'.\n.f ____ _ u ',0'33 ( \"T\nQQ\u0026lt;-Yj QI f.Q' ._-, ::_ __________ . .j A5enda 0 Mi md cs -t,ofY) } as1 we e.k.- ------. AZ .. SOtmiWEST JUNIOR HIGH SOiCOL STEERIJ\\IG C'CM-!ITI'EE MEETING N\u0026lt;NE11BER 11, 1993 AGENDA I. OLD BUSINESS - REPORTS FRCM CCMMITTEES A. PURPOSE/VISION - KLINE/MOORE B. ROLES/EXPECTATIONS - BARNES/COLEMAN/MUNNS C. PRcx::ESS - TICMORE ( (!.::,,-1~,.._.5.,.s) /Ut.3 D. INTERRELATIONALSHIP 0-!ARTS/GRAPHS - FALLS/WILLIFORD/BOLDEN ('IO BE PRESENTED NEXT 'IHURSDAY) II. NEW BUSINESS A. EQUITY MONI'IORIJ\\IG - DECD1BER 9 , 19 9 3 - SMI'.IH ..,. 8 /!JNC, {:,1~ B. ASSIQ.MENI'S FOR STUDEI.TS IN ISSP - BARNES.- I STEL/!-1L, ,v/\nc:.,.,.._n-.H'T\"i.E /f. R~fo5E- 1/2:. SJ~ ,v - ,Ct Po 1\u0026lt;.-r _,,,..,,, 14:, / j/JvC' ~IC -:t. r )fervu2. fc.~'-l A-r,.JI) ~C,\nU',1-.t -\n, /V F, ~ - -- 5\n-ak.,.r-f ~ CtJ#f PK/ TTE /II vu ~672--S: . ... Ms, . n/,-.1,. 1 5:. . r . . ft(~. g ,f-lT.,,./c-~ ./t(Jz. /\u0026lt;L1r-le Ak5, .)1LL1,Fr:llzb ft{Jz5. Ct:JLEM~ /ti t , r-,,,, L-L. S'.-~ - 7,:-\"\"J~-'7kc ,M/zL /soi...JE\"~ ,\nJ\u0026amp;.u~f/ ~1-~r/i37'l...S t,vli-l- ,t3E ,::Jv'T 7?.)/\n,\n'!Af -\nSLE-vfSc /11-5_\n/1/2.\u0026gt; \u0026amp;r-J 7L:J \"/~ fit~~\nZ c /J ok rs ,F}a\n,,v-- (!.LJ//'. vt.,, 77Ee...5 .A, )\u0026gt;u,z?~s./Vi'S1t\nr,.i - Mk.f-::.L1,-.J 5af7\"~'\u0026gt; L.\\.uE TD r1-/-6 Ms5,-,0eE ~F ,\n,1-.JE- J'r 7?/5,..k:. n-t ~/-\u0026amp;E::,h _ A / Fv. I.-'-- /z:.Yo.kT b-_,) 1 /....I..- AG\" Ou ...,. c3,,J ,.If 7 /'/1 t.. ~n=A= M?c.,, 1/4\"' l::\u0026gt;16 67/VC M-~ ovt:?k.1,r11:,Je 6., /z.aL-17~ /~ /\u0026gt;e~r,,-1 ~u,,...,5 - // t:o/'Y .o\n=- ,7?\n/c /z,\n-/\u0026gt;l'hZ.7 t,,vd:S 6, t v'c-7' 7o ,M.,/?1--//BGks rkE5t:.-=-7T ~ ~ ) /U) c..~ ., pt.(~, ...i 5. )L.e-4. b / r r 0 ~c.5 7\n, ,-...1 5 (/.J/37'z. ,!:3-1'.J 7-k.7/1/rJ\u0026amp;-_L) c /t/)c.s~ b'-.J11... .\n,/r~k\u0026lt;l ~ C,\u0026amp;,,..\nc.E-,t,...J wA-\u0026gt; 4-hl::}il::\"ss\u0026amp;~ ~r /ll\u0026gt;-61-~6- 7o '7/\n ,G.\u0026gt;c/'c~,~~l:5 1,,1.\n..\nh5k.... 7~ l-C,+h1t,--=h.s - 1~. ,4--s.s,,s.r v\u0026lt;J/r,,y\nr,,y,e ()\u0026amp;,/5Lc?E\nr\u0026lt;JT er- T~ d-~~A,, ,d/k, Jl--ct?J~.k-G\" 5/,,f-7236 b'Jlr~ ,,1 /\u0026gt;\"'1kE?\u0026lt;.)7 ,,,.~\u0026amp;. /S.. ?kcse/..J r -Wcr ~ 11c ~ L...D 2.E c:\n, ~v b-1 ,4 t.v/\u0026gt; y -r,::\n1:,/V,\"1-/ / N: vU tft7rdGt.. 7 tY ?7 //ff1/8 /'f7\u0026lt;J Y ~ uz\n=s 7\nc .,....:,~ ,::\n1:-_ -5\n,,t\u0026amp;.6:=E,/ o,,us\n~ t,,, ? lc.OC,ES5- 11,,(k, r f\u0026gt;pz,tc\n,,~c :Sr~?'E-.1::i M- l-.et\u0026gt;okT ~OvlL-~ AE 4v\".\n111.-ML AT /I L,,?l'\"E/C 6/1-TE: //411~. }!-L-1/J~ /JU\nbS'~~_s /\n-/J\u0026gt;I-T /i1/r bF.crS:ro...J . i l 1 II MA--/L,rJ6c. Fok~A-T ~/~,?\n1-1../.-/) BG 8- /~T r,tJk\n,:.r..ef L/ D //0,5uk. r#?fr C-,o~b'z,,._J~~~ut:...S /IA-.c 41\u0026gt;Jkc~~z=d ./  A-, tJk.bElc.L '( /t,,(~,tA.J,1--)f\n-k_ b \"\n:\n:\n.\nr\u0026amp;kkLA-v\u0026amp;?/'-'Sh\"o\u0026amp;l c' ,y/l-k:r5/\u0026amp;kA/-)//~ - //4.Ji L (... ~ t3 ~ lz ES\u0026amp;-:.\" c:-..2::. .4T A- L.\"'17 z::-.k 2.) A-TE f.\nJ GvJ lg t.\u0026lt;\u0026lt;\u0026gt;-,-/,,.J~\u0026lt;,. _!\n. .,4. Gf,u1 ry fllo~,r~k,,~k - DE-f\"'J. '7 ~w~, Svtt/n:,/ 5 / ,/-7'c32) //1/d T 7 ~ :=\u0026gt;ij-,:JU L ~ //~ -cv'\u0026amp;e,yT/// Al::\"t_ /,,.) /\u0026gt; L/lt-~ rkri.)1t. /Z' mdr br1 Ti=.., .:Srr-5 /4!3 Ln 7c-~ -r?rE / ~,,,.( /,!?k~c.E ,t)r LJc\n~ ~ ,gJ v\u0026amp;-~ 7\"tf /Z.E?Ob/~.T ~ ~b .5ukc //'4-f-T Ji= /1-,+vf. --U-JL~ (!_Ake t)F bcr/C:re,\u0026lt;-Jc=,-E-_s ,..._Jo~d\n~~~ v1511~/z.5 ~.1/-y A,E ?lcl3-5G\u0026lt;JT ,,,f-r ~\ny 7/~c ,? /l rt\u0026gt; k I c 771-c ,/4.,{ c ,\n-,, Tc:: k,, ,\n.-\u0026gt;6__. fs. /4'5\u0026gt; S r~,J/Mr\n~T.:S Ft:Jlr- 57ub~T.S. 1,,J -L-~ S ,r- /1,( ~. ~4-)~E-S. f/-A5 ,,f,s/t::E~ 7\"/r'~ r ~.-,/.//- /.'.'.'.G,/~,,b /ZhU//04 7\u0026amp;4-e..tVE..r~.5 TZ ,P,~v,6,e ,,-15S/~~G\"'C5 p,-J If kc6~ L,4k ~,1-s /\n. .l,,P/7'c~ /WJ?/AC:Avc,,J -~ /\n--~ Gi:\u0026gt; / .,.J Yi?~ .8.o.x.. t'/4\"',..z. 4{\"c))it Su.?_.-A.?7.k ,,. c=...6 -m,,. s A Y 1s,k-,,,,cJt5-r.,,~/4_ 1,A) /,1/E :5~c ~~,,,VL\u0026amp;t,..,._J /=-kb,L,J- /x'k.. C#EW?7~ .fJff .d/k\u0026gt; - ?~/?\n./ #-~ ,,f- /z:E~.Rw.~.Jbr??.tJ..-J 77#-r 7fi n-1 /T #FcA, \u0026lt;,w:f\nt\nPb,\n,? ~ }z~~.Gl\u0026gt;,,,,-v.a,...J /:\u0026gt;d-e,,.e.13-~ t/4-J /5i3 ~~t:\n=-_l) -0 /,'G~r ::5 7.w.b~zs '?/4,,+e77e SIL t-L~ A-~JJ ~/rE-~,,T C\nf-rJ ,g c G, ,//5?\"-J: -\n~- yU ~ E\ne..r\nFak._ ,4-/',PkoyA -L , _JJ7:- .!Uh. 1- u,.J~ ,P,1s5~ tf/L,t_ 'T $1,JFo~7r~_,,..j t9\n-) A-/=!Ek!\u0026gt;t::/.,t.oaL- r Jz o 6-,.k l}-y-v-- ,4--,,J ~ /3\n\u0026lt;.~ 5 c ff Eb K L. ~ s . ,, Ii I 1. Knowledge Work Project Total Evaluations 1993-94 /-Irr. '1 This group has facilitated my teaching techniques and ideas to another positive level. I believe only in the workshop atmosphere with other teams, could we have learned, been motivated, and expected to achieve the success we so desired. Meeting once a month was a constant and motivating factor in addressing new and innovative ways for kids to achieve emotional, social, as well as educational success. 2. The entire workshop on the whole was informative and creatively delivered. Sharing with teachers from other schools and our own gives a dynamic twist to it. The workshop presented a lot of thought and interaction. I really recommend that it be offered again. Since a few teachers dropped out due to the time consumed, perhaps a statement of their involvement when recruiting would help reduce dropouts. 3. 4. For the workshop as a whole, I've learned some new strategies to teach the work, and that I was already doing some of the strategies in my classroom. It's good to learn something new, but it also feels good to know you're doing something right. What a confidence builder. When planning units and activities I try to build in some of the qualities we have learned about. I think this has been very good for me personally. I believe the information gained is very useful and am excited about sharing it with others in my building. Personally, I would come to this training after school but I don't think many teachers would. 5. The fact that we have planned to present to our school shows we understand and will use the information we have studied this year. I've learned to focus on the work not the kids when preparing lessons. I needed this! 6. The knowledge work workshops have been extremely beneficial for me. I look at my lessons in an entirely different way, knowing what to build into a lesson to make it more interesting and relevant for students is very important. Not only does it make the student enjoy and value my class more, but it also helps with discipline! If a child is interested in the learning, he is less likely to get in trouble. Thank you! 7. With continued innovative training and sharing, we continue to be successful classroom teachers. The team concept and approach has created a new dimension to student learning and successes. l ! ~owledg Work Project Total Evaluation  by Participant 1993-94 /f#.4 8. Pluses: outstanding facilitator. I felt that I learned something about \"how\" I teach, not \"what\" I teach. Though good teachers use these qualities all the time, it has been an important tool in assessing my teaching. This course has served as an invaluable tool for me. I'm sure other teachers have and will gain from this experience. All objectives were met. Wishes: I realize that monthly meetings help generate new. concepts or reassess the qualities throughout the year, however I wish that we could do this in a shorter time span. 9. I have learned a lot from sharing with other teachers in the district what they have tried that works and what does not work. 10. This workshop has provided a resource so that I can design classroom activities to help engage students in the learning process. The work has also made me aware of qualities needed in order to create true classroom knowledge work. 11. During the process of these meetings, I was able to recognize the qualities that are needed to help make a more-effective lesson. Methods to get the students involved in learning are needed daily to meet expectations of today's society. I really enjoyed being able to share information and ideas with others who have had success in the teaching field. I gained valuable information that I can use daily in my classroom. 12. I feel I can articulate the objectives and qualities of knowledge work to others. I have enjoyed affiliating with others and learning strategies which have helped me in planning dynamic activities. I feel you would get more for your money if homework were given to the teachers. Assess teachers and make them accountable for actually using -che ideas in their schools  and classrooms. If we have these opportunities we should use them for what they are and not just as a day away from the students. 13. Fully understood the concepts of knowledge work. I will be able to identify design work for students. As facilitator can share and assess the degree of engagement of work of students. Share the success of design of knowledge work. The collaboration of planning was wonderful. 2 Xnowledge Work Project Total Evaluation by Participant 1993-94 ff{{.'1 14. The workshop has enabled me to feel confident in sharing and modelling actual knowledge work. Helped me to engage students in knowledge work and also design work for students to use. Given me time to associate and share with fellow teachers, as well as, involve resource people from the community. Can identify and assess the degree to which my students are engaged int he work and share examples. 15. I think the time was well spent. I learned many new techniques that I have and will implement in my classes. This has taught me to take the work load off of myself and put more responsibility on the students. I especially like the fact that students will be given choices: This will give the students more ownership in their work and more students will do it and be proud of it! 16. I believe we fully met the first three outcomes that are listed as well as the last two outcomes. I'm still having trouble with modifying variables. I believe that this workshop will cause me to strive for better prepared iessons and assignments. 17. We shared our successes which is always helpful. Practical discussion always counts more than theory. Most importantly, the knowledge work that we design will echo the activities of the other teachers involved. Hopefully kids will end up getting a majority of tasks designed with these qualities. We are now able to take this school wide. I think this is a project with a great potential for continuing, because of its's great practicability. 18. I think to be able to identify in work designed for students there can be some qualities that result in student's being engaged with the work. After working on this workshop I have been able to assess the degree to which students have been engaged. Thank you. 19. This workshop has enabled me to: to articulate and produce knowledge work. Engage students in knowledge work. I am able to design work for students use. We are able to identify and engage outside agencies in .community ~s facilitator. Assess knowledge work. Plan and solve problems individually and collaboratively.  20. The workshop has enabled me to articulate and produce J Jtnovledge Work Project Total Evaluation  by Participant  1993-94 /fff. T knowledge work. Engage students in knowledge work. I am able to design work for students to use. We are able to involve and identify outside agencies and community as facilitator. Assess knowledge work. Collaborative planning and problem solving. 4 rt: t:: The following is a compilation of pluses and wishes from the Leadership Retreat April 15-16, 1994. The leadership consisted of Principals, Assistant Principals, Team leaders or their designee, and the Steering Committee Chairpersons of the four restructuring schools. PLUSES~ ANYTHING YOU LIKED. 1. 2. 3. The ability of this group to be a open and honest about what is best for kids. What changes need to take place with staff to reach students. These are great dedicated people. I will miss this. Quality time to work on goals and action plans for our school. This meeting met our needs as well as or better than .!!.DY we have attended. Thanks to Linda Young! The entire day we had to work with our school team and focus on our plan for 94-95 was very beneficial. We were able to discuss some issues that we had previously swept aside, and we discussed some \"small\" things we could do this year to help with the 11big11 things next year. As usual, the food at the Red Apple was great. Thanks Linda and Gail for arranging a great retreat! 1. 2. 3. More discussion on strategies of delivery of instruction for students with low ability. The  assurance that these opportunities will continue for staff. None!! Excellent opportunity for work. We 1eed to continue these opportunit es. I really do not have any wishes for this retreat. I will just look forward to the next planning session! PLUSES - ANYTHING 4. 5. 6. 7. I like having the time to discuss school improvement and steps that can be followed to reach specific goals set out in our school COE plan. The communication was great! Sharing ideas with other schools. Emphasis on school planning of obtainable programs. Cooperation between administrator and staff. Uninterrupted time together to work through ideas. Sharing of ideas with other schools. Great! Looking intensely at the COE plan to evaluate and reinstated goals. When we shared with the different schools on what we are each doing positive. Dividing into our individual schools and talking about what we are going to do to improve staff morale. Things we planned to get parental involvement. 4. 5. 6. 7. I would like to have met more with teachers from other schools to share ideas and successes, but the day with our own school was great! These workshops help define goals, reestablish team and faculty successes. overall, I feel this workshop was very successful in meeting many needs. Hore time together. Hore resources to provide incentives for performance and behavior. Continued availability of team planning time. Nothing - I thought the time was refreshing, profitable and laid back all at the same time. Continued support in our endeavors to reach kids who have high needs. Nothing, really!! I was pleased with all we did. 8. The agendas of the meeting were excellent. I liked the format of the meetings as it allowed for group sharing and ample time for our school to work together independently. An excellent retreat. 9. Great opportunity to address an area we have skirted around for too long. Good progress made, an opportunity to get our thoughts in order. 10. Support system for new teachers and other staff. Students given an opportunity to have success in what every stage of development they are currently in. 11. Excellent accommodations - good food, great rooms. Well-planned agenda\neverything flowed very smoothly. Forest Heights group had a really productive and enlightening session. 12. I really enjoyed the school time. We were able to accomplish a lot of good work. Work that could not have been done in Little Rock with all our other distractions. (family, home, kids, etc ... ) 13. Our own agenda. B. My room was too warm last night/my fault/too lazy to adjust the temperature. 9. None. 10. Follow through on very welldeveloped plans. More inter team coordination. 11. I wish the cross-school sharing time had been a little more structured. We seemed to have been a little confused about our end goal coming out of the starting gate. 12. N/A. 13. We really need more time -- as usual. PLUSES - ANYTH:J:t~G 14. We got to work together with our colleagues in our school. We accomplished so many positive ideas for our school and our students. We were united for one idea - our goal. 15. It was great to be afforded the opportunity to get .2!!.t, of LR for our retreat. A lot of progress came out of this meeting. It's a fact, I believe this was the best meeting I've attended all year. 16. Time to share with our faculty members as a group. We were able to accomplish a great deal. 17. + Working with my fellow co-workers in a relaxed productive manner. + Accommodations. + Swap Session 14. Nothing. 15. This meeting was everything I wanted it to be. 16. We could have more retreats or workshops strictly for planning school acthrities and strategies. 17. More time. PLUSES - ANYTHING YOU 18. This retreat enabled me to have a better understanding of the other faculty members' attitudes toward certain issues. I had a wonderful time. 19. Sharing ideas as a group. I believe we accomplished what we set out to do. 20. Sharing. 21. I preferred this retreat to others because of the fact that we were allowed to work within our own school issues. 18. I liked the individual schools having the all-day session. We were able to relax~ discuss, and key in some key issues affecting our schools. We were able to accomplish a great deal of concerns. It was good for the fellowship (camaraderie) among the administrators and staff. (Thanks). The sharing of interdisciplinary ideas and units was very helpful. These and other ideas are valuable resources in making our approach to educating our children to be successful. These can provide exciting classroom experiences. 19. None. 20. Longer time. 21. None. PLUSES - ANYTHiNG YOU LIKED. 22. I preferred leaving here with some very distinct and workable solutions for the remainder of this school year to address a problem of tremendous concern for central office at present(# of discipline sanctions). Finally, we have a motto intact and a VISION!! I feel as if we are really moving forward. Enjoyed freedom to develop our own agenda - One of the best ones we've had. 23. We formed a vision statement. We had time to make some workable plans for alternative discipline. 24. I really enjoyed the commitment and excitement generated by the Southwest Jr. High Staff. We dealt with critical issues (1) absenteeism, (2) student/ teacher conflict, (3) discipline with dignity. our staff participation was excellent. We have developed a plan that can truly work. We enjoyed the team effort. 26. I enjoyed meeting with members of my school and trying to come up with solutions for problems, concerns of our school. 22. Too little time - passed too auicklyl! Didn't get up and run this am! (but felt good to sleep in.) 23. None. 25. None. 26. I wish we could have shared our ideas with the other schools. PLUSES 27. Everything - it was one of the best, productive retreats I've been too. 28. Today was super! I only wish that we could do this more often. This weekend was so beneficial to all of us. Working together to help our building to be better is what we're all about ... Making kids feel good about themselves and the school is very important! 29. I liked our goal: To suggest action steps to coordinate and unify the work of the steering committee and school staff members. (T-shirts - love it). 30. The valuable insight of the team leaders. The ability to plan for the future. The opportunity to have research available to offer a strong knowledge base for effective planning. 31. Atmosphere was great for sharing. 27. That the District would listen to us as well as just look at numbers!! We're now just statistics. What if Columbus had turned around and quit? 28. Wish we could do this morel Great Weekend! {Smile face.) 29. None. 30. \"I loved it\" {Smile face.) 31. Wish we could have met with the other schools after we met. It was great. PLUSES - 32. I enjoyed the time with staff - It would 32. None. be nice if we could meet twice per year. I think the steering committee has taken shape and is functioning well. We were able to put together some ideas that will, I am sure help our kids be more successful in school. Thanks for the opportunity. 33. I feel that I got more out of this 33. None. year's retreat than any other. The time spent Saturday was most productive and the Friday session helps us get an opportunity to applaud, assist and encourage each other. 34. I liked the time to plan with individual 34. None. schools. The time was well spent. Enjoyed the day. 35. Teachers sharing successful strategies 35. This was a great meeting! on how to reduce discipline problems and Thanks. improving academic performance is a very good concept. I really liked the ideas of letting teachers who are not team leaders attend the retreat. PLUSES - ANYTHING YOU LIKED. 36. Being able to come together as a team, working together, for a common goal, I feel, increased productivity on the part of teachers and students. students know that we caret We have less behavior problems because many minor problems are dealt with within the team. I see next year as a real opportunity, as we try to go full-force into the advisor-advisee program. 37. As a new team leader and a teacher new to the teaming approach, I am again very impressed with the support and time dedicated to making the re-structured approach work! I find this time with other staff and administrators to be extremely valuable and encouraging. The \"swap\" time last night gave me~ good ideas and the all day planning session today helped our staff design and begin to implement and wonderful new advisoradvisee program. Pulaski Heights is truly on the \"cutting edge\" of the restructuring movement. 38. Having time to develop a plan that we WILL use. Without the planning time, to develop programs (s) for increasing successful strategies for ALL students would be impossible and more students would fall through the educational cracks. 36. None. 37. None. 38. Hore planning time for schools to develop more successful strategies for all students! PLUSES - ANYTHING YOU LIKED. _, . -::::-\n~:l . . . . 39. I really liked the format this year. it is so helpful to get together with other teachers for idea exchanges. 40. Share sessions to find out about successful team activities that other schools are using to keep students in school and provide motivation for learning. Example: Discussed\nA. Interdisciplinary units. B. Conflict resolution - peer mediation. c. Block Scheduling. 2. Time for school planning - plans for small group setting - Advisor-Advisee. 41. The format was extremely beneficial. It was such that individual schools had 42. time to plan for the upcoming year after hearing on the previous night the successful interventions and programs being implemented in other schools. It was an excellent time to be creative, to dream, to take risks with brainstorming for better schools next year. Lots of definite plans with deadlines were established. Ended up with a product! Had an opportunity to plan a program that designed to reach~ of our kids. relaxed atmosphere promotes ideas. is The 39. Chances for more swap sessions during the school year. 40. All was valuable - need this time more often. 41. I think that the goals established were met, and an appreciation for our teams was renewed. Thanks for the opportunity. 42. Didn't have enough time to get everything done that needs to be done. PLUSES - ANYTHING YOU LIKED. 43. Great atmosphere - Extremely conducive to brainstorming and getting things done. Our group was close and on task in planning for the future and working for an even more effective learning environment. Hass meeting of sharing with other schools gave some great ideas that might be used at our own learning center. The New Futures Restructured schools seem to go all the way for the benefit of the whole child. 44. The accommodations and format for the weekend was great! The initiatives promoted by the restructuring schools are paramount to ensure the students' needs for tomorrow. The environment created allows teachers and students to work towards addressing the complex issues and challenges that today's society presents to our kids. Not only can we provide academic instructions, but we can assist the students with their growth a,~ maturation in becoming contributing citizens of our community. 45. Having the opportunity to work and plan strategies to help students achieve their potential - restructuring has allowed us to spend the time before implementation thinking about and planning our activities. 43. Longer sessions - possibly the use of audio visual material next time i.e. examples ' on tape of what was used at other schools or slides. 45. Time for a round of golf! 46. That we had more opportunities to plan like this during the school year - away from the day to day hassle. rr n . :.\u0026gt; CLOVERDALE JR HIGH AFTER 50-iOOL PROGRAM 1JiAME f1!AMf 1.t2t ~IEAM GPA 1 '1W GPA 2 ffi AII. ADKINS JERMAlNE 897813 9 NAV 2.57 2.87 EX ALLEN CEDRIC 913929 9 NAY 1.14 0.857 GOOD ALLEN SHONEY 167292 8 STARS 2.0 2.714 EX AWSON SHARONDA 166990 8 PAWS 2.83 3.167 EX ASHFORD JOHNNY 919538 8 PAWS 1.71 2.167 EX AYERS TIFFIN! 894198 7 UNTOUC 3.14 3.5 EX BAKER DEUNDRA 878038 7 7WOND 3.714 3.714 EX BEVERLEY TANESHIA 898261 9 NAV 3.14 2.571 GOOD BIDDLE ELIZABETH 914141 7 UNTOUC 4.0 4.0 EX BIWNGS JAVIA 931601 9 AFROSH 0.857 1.0 AV BIVENS RONNIESHA 164323 9 AFROSH 3.428 3.0 GOOD BLACK AL 937715 8 STARS 2.428 1.714 GOOD BLACKMON ARLESHIA 898297 8 STARS 2.5 3.333 EX BRENT LAVAR 914272 9 NAV 2.0 1.857 GOOD BROWN ROY 914404 9 NAV 2.0 2.0 AV BROWN SHAMEKA 898608 8 STARS 3.5 3.333 GOOD BUCKLEY RASHAWN 896737 9 NAV 2.857 3.286 EX BUFORD TINIKA 951774 8 PAWS 2.142 1.857 GOOD BURGESS SHELENA 892140 8 STARS 2.857 3.0 GOOD CALAHAN CHERRY 899103 9 NAV 3.571 3.571 EX CARTER ERICA 896872 7 7WOND 3.571 3.429 EX COGSHELL LAKISHA 899047 8 STARS 2.714 3.286 EX COMBS BEVERLY 899099 7 7WOND 3.285 3.0 GOOD COOPER SHANDTELL 168677 7 7WOND 0.428 1.5 EX COTTRELL LAKENYA 935376 9 NAV 3.167 3.167 EX COVINGTON HENRY 905510 9 AFROSH 2.714 1.571 GOOD CRAFT BRANDON 907074 7 7WOND 4.0 4.0 PERFECT CUNNINGHAM CASEY 165867 7 UNTOUC 1.857 1.714 GOOD DANIEL ROBERT 959568 9 AFROSH 2.285 1.571 GOOD DAVIS DEERICA 924963 7 7WOND 2.857 3.143 GOOD DEDNER TAMEKIA 899412 8 STARS 3.428 3.286 EX DEPRIEST GILLAN 909808 7 7WOND 3.428 3.286 EX DINWIDDLE CARLA 894060 7 UNTOUC 1.571 1.143 GOOD DIXON NIHISSA 890167 7 UNTOUC 3.0 3.667 PERFECT DRAKE DEDE 894505 7 UNTOUC 1.571 0.286 GOOD DUNCAN SHAWN 912593 7 7WOND 3.428 3.714 EX FLOWERS ANGELA 164265 9 NAV 0.143 0.143 POOR FLOWERS DIONDRA 896585 7 UNTOUC 3.714 3.286 EX FLOWERS KELANI 899888 7 UNTOUC 3.571 3.429 EX FRANKS SHARONDA 155075 9 NAV 3.5 3.5 GOOD FURGUERSON BILLY 900054 9 NAV 2.43 2.143 AV GARMON SHAMARRA 920200 8 PAWS 3.0 3.0 EX GIBSON ANDREW 163180 9 NAV 1.571 1.571 POOR GIBSON SIOBHAN 926399 8 STARS 3.0 2.714 EX GILL DARYL 900156 7 7WOND 3.428 2.0 EX GRIST RATHA 953000 9 NAV 3.571 3.571 GOOD HALL ALVIS 900405 9 AFROSH 3.285 3.429 EX HALL KIM 900424 7 UNTOUC 2.857 2.0 GOOD HAMMOND DAQUAN 908896 7 UNTOUC 2.0 1.286 EX CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM ~ FNAME .IQI. SIB IEAM GPA 1 9W GPA 2 9W ATT. HAMPTON BRANDON 900455 7 7WOND 4.0 3.333 EX HARRIS DEMARIUS 908916 9 NAV 1.857 1.429 EX HARRIS KIM 900539 8 STARS 2.857 3.0 GOOD HOLLEY TERRENCE 900820 8 PAWS 1.857 2.0 GOOD HOWARD April 164'150 7 7WOND 2.0 0.857 AV HURD CEDRIC 166967 9 NAV 3.285 2.429 GOOD HYMES KAREN 929676 7 7WOND 3.428 3.0 EX IRELAND CHERONDA 900980 8 PAWS 3.857 3.857 EX JACKSON LAFANTA 951955 7 UNTOUC 2.285 3.143 EX JACKSON TARSALON 901039 8 PAWS 2.428 2.571 PERFECT JOHNSON CAMEL.A 164'195 8 PAWS 2.857 3.0 EX JOHNSON MISTI 914\"147 7 UNTOUC 2.714 3.429 EX JOLLY LISA 907959 7 7WOND 3.714 3.714 EX JORDAN JAMES 892787 8 STARS 2.857 2.857 GOOD JORDAN YULANDA 166700 9 NAV 3.333 2.5 GOOD KING DEON 930003 7 7WOND 3.71\"1 3.429 GOOD LANIGAN ANTONIO 166701 9 AFROSH 3.0 3.714 EX LEE DWAYNE 901634 7 7WOND 3.429 2.286 PERFECT LONGLEY YOLANDA 901796 7 UNTOUC 3.429 3.429 EX LOVE JANA 901802 7 UNTOUC 2.587 2.833 EX LOVE NASHA 896558 8 STARS 2.285 3.143 GOOD LOVE TASHANA 155183 7 UNTOUC 2.285 1.714 EX  i MADISON LATRESHA 895011 7 7WOND 1.428 0.571 POOR MARBLEY NINA 891703 7 7WOND 3.571 3.571 GOOD t.4ARTIN ELONDA 914314 7 UNTOUC 2.285 2.143 GOOD MCCUNTON GREGORY 952953 8 PAWS 2.142 2.0 GOOD MCCUNTON KENYU 952952 9 NAV 3.142 2.0 GOOD MCCRARY SHAWNECE 902107 8 PAWS 3.142 3.286 GOOD MCGILL CHASTITY 926191 8 STARS 2.142 2.857 EX MCMILLAN JACQUELYN 902190 7 UNTOUC 3.5 3.0 EX MILLER ROBIN 959747 7 UNTOUC 4.0 4 EX NORFLEET ROSALYN 162033 9 NAV 1.285 1.857 EX PARKER CHINNAILL 951421 7 7WOND 2.0 2.286 GOOD PARKER TERRELL 902833 8 STARS 1.857 1.286 GOOD PATRICK BRODERICK 937179 9 AFROSH 2.428 1.571 GOOD PATRICK TOYRAN 896311 7 7WOND 3.714 4.0 EX PORTER ALBERT 153682 9 NAV 2 0.741 AV PORTER DERICKO 153892 9 NAV 0.857 0.857 AV PRIVETT JOHNA THAN 952864 9 NAV 3.714 3.429 EX RAFTER MARCUS 903156 9 NAV 1.285 1.571 EX RAY STEVE 903211 7 UNTOUC 3.0 2.857 EX REED LATIA 890134 8 STARS 2.714 3.143 EX ROBINSON LAWANDA 896142 7 UNTOUC 1.571 1.714 GOOD ROBINSON SHERELL 951097 7 7WOND 3.571 3.714 GOOD ROGERS STANLEY 911352 8 STARS 2.714 2.429 EX SASU ELIZABETH 960732 8 PAWS 2.428 3.667 EX SEBOURN AMANDA 916190 9 NAV 3.714 4.0 EX SHAVERS MAURICE 892971 8 PAWS 3.714 3.5 EX SHERRER MATOSHA 903709 8 STARS 2.142 3.286 EX SHERRER MONICA 903710 9 AFROSH 1.857 1.857 EX I - ~ II CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH AFTER 50-IOOL PROGRAM 111 ~ FNAME ll2! ~IEAM GPA 1 9W GPA 2 !1W AIL SIDERS DANIEL 931301 7 UNTOUC 2.142 1.857 EX Sil.AS CARL 937573 7 UNTOUC 3.0 2.143 GOOD SIMMONS I WILMON 903748 7 7WOND 2.714 1.571 GOOD SIMS SHARRA 903n1 8 STARS 3.0 3.60 EX SMITH CANDICE 959569 7 7WONO 3.857 3.714 EX SMITH DENISHA 925214 7 7WOND 3.428 4.0 EX SPEARMON CEDRIC 95233.tl 9 AFROSH 1.857 1.429 EX I SPEARMON Cl.EDIUS 932336 8 STARS 2.714 3.0 EX SPROUSE TIFFANY 903968 7 7WOND 2.857 3.571 EX 11 STOVER NATALEA 894752 7 7WONO 3.428 3.143 EX 11 STRONG CRYSTAL 926'179 7 UNTOUC 2.142 2.0 EX SUWVAN KIM 1679'12 8 STARS 3.0 2.571 EX SUMMERS MARQUIS 904148 9 NAV 2.428 2.0 EX TATUM STEPHANIE 9onos 7 UNTOUC 2.571 1.857 GOOD I! TERRELL LAKUA 914268 9 NAV 1.429 1.429 GOOD Ii THOMAS ERICKA 9096.tlS 7 7WOND 4.0 4 GOOD II THOMAS TINA 935n2 7 UNTOUC 2.587 3.286 EX I TURNER TARA 904454 7 7WOND 2.0 1.429 EX ,, TWITTY LENARD 951283 9 NAV 2.833 2.833 EX lYLER EARNEST , 908876 8 PAWS 0.714 0 .0 POOR WAL.KER SHELLEY 904573 11 8 PAWS 3.142 3286 EX II WATERS SCHEKISA 901319 9 NAV 2.428 2.0 GOOD WEBB LAKIESHA 913292 9 NAV 1.428 2286 GOOD WHALEY FRANK 891875 8 PAWS 2.0 0.714 GOOD J!I WHITE NAMONA 931658 7 7WOND 3.142 3.1 '13 EX fl WILDER VICTORIA 904841 7 7WONO  .O -1.0 EX I WIWAMS AMANDA 897438 7 7WONO 2.429 2.429 GOOD J! WIWAMS ANTOINETTE 8922'13 7 UNTOUC 1.714 2.1'13 EX WIWAMS BRIAN 16'1240 9 NAV 1.714 1.857 GOOD WIWAMS OOREY 892078 9 AFROSH 3.5 2.429 GOOD II WIWAMS JAMIE 890520 8 PAWS 2.571 2.571 EX ii WIWAMS PATRICE 951273 8 STARS 3.285 2.71.tl GOOD WIWAMS SHEVONNE 917345 8 STARS 2.571 3.1'13 EX 11 WIWAMS TAMIKA 892186 7 UNTOUC 0.857 1.143 GOOD \\,I WIWAMS TERRENCE 904956 9 NAV 3.857 3.1 '13 GOOD WITT SHAOONDRIA 905025 7 7WOND 3.428 3.0 EX ,\nI WOODLEY TAMEKA 905061 8 PAWS 3.33 3.5 EX WOODS ANTONIETTE 905064 7 7WOND 1.428 1.714 GOOD WOODS CLAUDIA 896273 7 7WONO 3.428 3286 EX WOODS KEISHA 896646 9 AFROSH 3.428 3.1 '13 EX 11 WOODS MY1A 905069 8 STARS 2285 3.143 EX WRIGHT KEVIN 162553 8 PAWS 1.571 0.857 POOR I , . , 11 .   J ~:~liOlli. SQ[JTHWEST._..lllNIQR._filGH ?Rr:JC::,111_ CHARITY SMITH TE ACHi: R_ _,. .A...,N\"\"N._.E~T._..T.. E ..._. B... .,Au:Ru.N,...E-S_.,__ l. Please in::!i::ate the r.t:.'7::)e::- of .stu:ients referred for ~nch grndc level by se:-:, \n~:'!::e 3nd:classification. -------,,,.......,..-,-~~----------:-::-:-:-:-:..:=-~\n-:,-\n,,..,,-\n,...,..-:...,.....,,-------r-----:---------- Totu I Cirau2 :!tl:i8Efl l\u0026lt;i:Fffr.\n.:._:, Enrollment t~ i i't::!: I l!hl te i ut:-:2r -:-ota 1 C'. :s:::i\n\".-:'i I i-------- '.:r2cie 5 l aci'. \\Jtli t8 j D ~r12r : :-1,:\n1 2 I :=:0.~10 I e Jhale Ferna1,s !\n-!a , f: r2ma le ri2fe:-red ! R::::1. I .,~I J\nI I ! ! I I ! I I I I i I ! i 7 183 32 7 1 9 7 4 0 I 3 I 0 I 33 I 32 ' 1 I I ---  I I I i I I I I .3 178 52 i 4 ! 18 i 15 6 0 i 0 I 0 39 I 36 I 3 I I\n' ----- I I i I i I I ! :\n169 44 8 26 8 2 1 0 0 37 29 8\nI : I I i i i ' i I I 7C.~.L 530 128 I 1 9 I 63 ' 30 12 1 ! 3 0 109 97 ! 12 I ,, Tctal students re-12r::cd: 109 ~. :otal recoraed ab.sei'lc-es: 63 Total da.ys assigned: 358 i~umber of studen:s not ::~:, ~ting ~ssignmen: t: :ssP: 9 RECEIVE,... i~urn~er :f r2pe5t2~3: 2~?te - 4 JUN 1 4. 1994 ------ NEW FUTUf .. Grcde 9 4 ?h:::me 5 School SOUTHWEST JR. Number of :e2cher sonfe~~~ses: Srade 7 4 Grad2 8 Gr\":2 9 -------- Grade 7 I 122 G:-ade 8 96 G:-ade 9 71 l~tervention and Follow-up Activities: Please describe in nar:--ative formthevarious interven:.ion strategies and fol1ow-up plans and/or contacts that have occurred with students as~igned to the ln-Schc~l Suspension Program. ISSP OBJECTIVES: 1. To help students evaluate his/her behavior by completing suspension learning packets. 2. To use self-discipline to improve academic and social performance. ~v\u0026amp;luation: Please describe in narrative form the aeneral reaction of the following\n~cups to the In-School Suspension Program: stuaents who have been referred, teache~s 2nd administrative staff, parents, and the In-School Suspension teacher. The overall acceptance of the program has been excellent. Students have responded very positively to the learning packets with intent to avoid return visits. Teachers, administrators, counselors, parents, case managers, and significant others have complimented the program with exceptional reviews . . Support is evidenced by written comments, physical presence, and student work and reactions. -, ~ota1 visits to ISSP by: School cd~inistrators --=2=3 _______ _ J . School counselors ____ .....:.7 ______ _ Teachers 140 .., J. O the: ( pi ease spec i f y ) _p=a.::r-=e\n.\nn\n:_\nt::\n.\ns::\n..__---'1 _ _ Attiti onal Comments: This year we are attempting to work closer with case management and the counseling staff by making contact for individual students and requesting personal visits. We have provided teachers with suggested strategies to help support students who have been assigned with personal invitations to stop in and visit with students during their period of assignment. Our aim is to remove students from the mainstream in order to work on unacceptable behavioral characteristics, keep them on schedule, provide them with positive alternatives, and return them equipped for academic success in the classroom. I School dist-rict pcrrticipation Provides experts in non-academic fields to assist in planning preventive programs, providing in-service training, and designing after care support systems in the school. Immediate accessibility for referral when youth are identified who need social or health services. Provides assistance from the broader community in addressing crisis situations that occur during the school day. Creates a more direct link between the school and the home. Enhances the parent's, youth's and community's perception of schools as caring places. Allows teachers to focus more clearly on the academic needs of the students. Creates a healthier, happier student body. Provides a caring supportive adult to assist with non-academic problems Provides a coordinated plan for delivering needed educational, social and health services to the youth or their family Ensures someone is responsible for following up on referrals to outside agencies to be sure they are provided. Establishes a more direct link between the school and the home. Increases the opportunities for youth to obtain the social and academic skills needed for later succcess. Youth-cente-red fr family-o-riented flt(. ? Coo-rdinated se-rv1ces Provides direct linkage between youth-serving agencies and the public schools. Facilitates coordinated service among numerous agencies serving the same youth or family. Increases the opportunities for agencies to assist in developing preventive programs for youth. Allows for earlier identification of problems and more appropriate referrals to needed services. Provides a person to assist with removing barriers to effective use of services and to provide follow up after services are completed. Provdies more accurate information about the nature and extent of problems confronted by youth for use in future planning and program development. Young Professionals Clubs Support Groups School visits from convicts Field trips Participation in Little Rock Civitan Club's \"Rainbow of Love\" bowling tournament Worthen Bank sponsors day at Wild River Country A.A. and Alanon Community connection 1/ /tff.'l\u0026gt; GOA.LS A'-\"D OBJECTIVES REPORT In the Spring of 1992, the Director of Case Management met with participating CMST Agency Supervisors and Case Managers to develop Goals and Objectives for the CMST Project. The major Goal identified is:  ENHANCE ACADE~IC PERFORMANCE OF CMST STUDENTS Four objectives are established as a way to realize the Goal: Objective 1  50% of students on CMST caseloads will increase GPA by at ]e?.st .2 per semester during involvement with CMST. Objective 2  50% of students on CMST caseloads will not be absent more than 12 days per semester. Objective 3  A positive success plan for beh\niviori\\l improvement will be developed by Case Manager, Teache: Team, Vice Principal. Parent(s) and student for all students on CMST caseloads with a history of suspension and/or expulsion. Plan development will begin October 1, 1992 anc will continue at the rate of one each week until !)Ian has been developed for all students on the Case Manager's caseioad with histo1\n of suspension and/or expulsion. Objective 4  All students identified as parents will be considered automatically referred to CMST for services, and no repeat pregnancies will occur within this population during the year. Outcome data were collected at the end of each school semester du ring the 1992-1993 school year and 1993-1994 school vear. The outcomes for some students were excluded from consideration in the following circumstances:  Never received signed consent for services.   Referred c?.ses where no need for Case Mana2ement services existe d.  Cases in which services were terminated prior -to November l during the Fall semester, and prior to April l during the Spring semester of each school year.  Cases where data were unavailable due to missing school records. The results for all other students follow. . . - CL FH PH SW / Ttls .~alysis: . . FALL 9.2 I SPRI:--\nG 93 I FALL 93 I SPRl!'.G 94 Tot Tot % Tot % Tot Tot % Cases \u0026gt;.2 I Tot Cases \u0026gt;.2 Cases \u0026gt;.2 l Tot Cases 58 82 64 44 248 19 33% 94 27 29% 53 17 32% 63 33 40% 100 31 31% 58 17 29% 71% 25 39% 117 30 26% 79 34 43% 98 16 36% 99 26 26% 58 13 22% 59 93 38% ~10 114 28% 248 81 33% 291 The objective of 50% of CMST students increasing GPA by at least .2 per semester was not achieved. In the Fall 93 semester, Pulaski Heights reached 43%, the highest percentage achieved in any semester. Significant increases in number of cases considered occurred each spring semester. This occurs as the number of cases referred increases caseload sizes as the school year progresses. It is also noted that there is a significant decrease in the percentage of students meeting the GPA outcome objective. This may be due to increased caseload sizes during the spring sei,1ester. Staff also cite a tendency for students to work only hard enough during the spring semester to assure passing to the next grade level. Tot % \u0026gt;.2 17 27% 17 24% 23 23% 19 32% 76 26% r. - - T - . l FALL 92 SPRI!'iG 93 . FALL 93 SPRING 94 Tot + % Tot + % Tot + % Tot + % Cases Att Cases Att Cases Att Cases Att CL 70 34 49% 96 62 65% 75 43 57% 73 29 40% FH 93 31 33% 104 40 38% 66 18 27% 75 16 21% PH 74 33 45% 120 65 54% 108 66 61% 100 45 45% 11 ' SW 72 28 39% 101 28 28% 69 23 33% 74 27 36% ,!: Ttls 309 126 41% 421 195 46% 318 150 47% 322 117 36%\n' Analysis: There is a wide range in these figures, from 65% at Cloverdale in Spring i 93 to 21 % at Forest Heights in Spring 94. Also the totals for Springs 94 i were 36%, a decrease from both the Spring 93 figure of 46% and the Fall I 93 figure of 47%. It is noted that staff resignations during the Spring 94 Iii semester left 2 of 4 positions vacant for several months at Forest Heights. !:,I !I ! Iii I II I ' . II II II i - -- .. I ! - - - . -. FALL 92 SPRl~G 93 I FALL 93 SPRING 94 ~ Tot + % Tot + % Tot + % Tot + % Cases Pia Cases Pia Cases Pia Cases Pia ' - CL 26 FH 51 PH 35 SW 34 Ttl 146 s .nalysis: n n n n 17 65% 47 28 60% 40 35 88% 53 46 14 27% 68 _., ..,. 34% 39 10 26% 40 3 18 51% 54 33 61% 45 43 96% 60 55 2 6% 59 2 3% 36 36 100 42 41 % 51 35% 2~S 86 38% 160 124 78% 195 145 Overall very good improvement from one school year to the next, especially for Southwest. Forest Heights is the notable exception, and this primarily due to staff vacancies. 87% 8% 92% 98% 74% L School Year 1992-93 School Year 1993-1994 Total Total w/ Tot.al Total w/ Parents 2nd Preg Parents 2nd Preg 11 1 15 1 bts 10 2 12 1 ights 10 3 12 5 est 11 1 4 0 ~ Totals 42 7(17%) 43 7(16%) Analysis: Outcomes are essentially the same for each year. Planning, Research and Evaluation Program Evaluation Primary Leader: Dr. Henry P. Williams Secondary Leader: Dr. Robert L. Clowers Program Name: Plannio\u0026amp; and Evaluation Services Program Description: Purpose: Scope and Content: Participants/Beneficiaries: Program Goals: Evaluation Criteria: The Planning, Research and Evaluation Department (PRE) operates as a quasi-independent unit which provides information and technical assistance to the Superintendent and Board for strategic planning. To provide overall planning activities for the District and to provide information required for District and building level decision making. The scope of activities included in Planning and Evaluation services include: semi-annual Educational Equity Monitoring visits\nCoordination of the Planning and Budgeting process\nCoordination of the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test (AMPT was discontinued following the spring 1994 administration)\nCoordination of the Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition\nCoordination of the School Climate/Human Relation Survey\nCoordination of the Arkansas Direct Writing Assessment\nCoordination of Home Schooling tasks\nconducts studies and prepares reports as identified by the Board\nMaintains archival records\nMaintains records of elementary students withdrawn from the district. Participants and beneficiaries includes students, building level principals and staff, administrators, the Board of Directors, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, and other parties involved in the court approved desegregation case. To provide appropriate data and technical assistance for planning and implementing equitable learning experiences for all students. 1.0 Completed semi-annual report of findings in the thirteen (13) monitoring categories. 1.1 Copies of completed documents. 2 1.2 List of local team members. 1.3 Agenda of completed training sessions and list of team members who received training. 1.4 Individual School Profiles are available through the AS/400 at the central office. 1.5 Completed monitoring schedule for all schools. 1.6 Completed composite report for each visit. 1. 7 Semi-annual reports are prepared and distributed as scheduled. 2.1 Planning and budgeting process is conducted as outlined in the Management Tool. 2.2 AMPT is administered as scheduled. 2.3 Stanford Achievement test is administered as scheduled. 2.4 Surveys are administered as scheduled. 2.5 All Arkansas Writing Assessment tasks are completed as designed and scheduled. 2.6 Home School tasks are completed according to Act 42 of 1985. 3. 0 Studies are conducted as designed and reports are published and distributed as required. 3.1 Assessment reports are published and distributed to appropriate persons. 3.2 Reports are published and distributed to appropriate persons. 3.3 The archival records are maintained and available for inspection. 3.4 The records are stored on microfilm for immediate Evaluation Results Objective 1: 3 retrieval. 4.0 Administration of School Climate/Human Relations Survey. To conduct semi-annual E.ducational Equity Monitoring visits with the assistance of the local school biracial committees. E.ducational Equity Monitoring teams comprised of an Evaluation Specialist along with local school biracial committee members conduct monitoring visits each semester of each school year. The outcome of each monitoring visit is a consensus report of the findings of the monitoring visit. These reports are on file in the PRE Department. Each school in the district was visited each semester during the 1993-94 school year. Principals are required to form the local school biracial committee for their building and then send a copy to PRE. At the beginning of each school year, PRE conducts an inservice/training for local school biracial committee participants. The inservice is typically conducted in October prior to the monitoring visits. School principals are also given instructions at the start of the school year to input information into the AS/400 which is used as part of the school profile. Monitoring schedules are established between the Evaluation Specialist assigned to monitor the school and the school principal. The monitoring visits are then conducted. The consensus reports are later summarized and compiled for a semester report. The individual consensus reports are copied and distributed to selected administrators and the building principals for feedback, as needed. The semester reports are distributed to selected administrators, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, and Joshua Intervenors. Discussion: The objective of conducting semi-annual E.ducational Equity Monitoring visits with the assistance of the local school biracial committee members was met. The monitoring visits serve as a cardinal form of feedback to the building principal and other LRSD administrators regarding the educational equity concept at the building level. Objective 2: To provide assistance that promotes the planning process of the LRSD. Please note that strategies listed under this objective include the planning and budgeting process along with the administration of various districtwide tests, a school climate survey, and home school tasks. 'IT II [I II I -I - ------ --- 4 A planning and budgeting process manual (the \"Gray Book\") is prepared by the summer of each newly started fiscal year and serves as an overall guide to the planning and budgeting process for the upcoming fiscal year. A \"Management Tool\" is similarly prepared for guidance in preparation of the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Superintendent's Council meets regularly to review the management tool, which is filed at the end of each month with the court. In addition to the management tool, the office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation also coordinates the compilation of a Program Budget Document (PBD), which is filed quarterly with the court. The PBD includes achievement information for the District's desegregation and nondesegregation programs. Training sessions regarding the PBD process are coordinated through PRE. The Arkansas Minimum Performance Test (AMPT) was coordinated through PRE as scheduled {spring 1994 was the last administration of the AMPT, however). The Stanford Achievement test, Eighth Edition, was administered during spring 1994 as scheduled. The Arkansas Direct Writing Assessment was also administered as scheduled. The School Climate survey was conducted in Spring 1994 among students, certified staff, and a random sampling of parents. Home schooling tasks, which principally relate to the distribution of requested home school application and forwarding of an enrollment list to the Arkansas Department of Education, was conducted through PRE. Discussion: The objective of providing assistance to promote the planning process of LRSD was met. The District is now in its second year of following a Planning and Budgeting process as directed by the court. The staff time required for the production of the Management Tool and the PBD has taken staff resources away from other projects or studies as described in this evaluation. In the 1993-94 school year, only one Evaluation Specialist was utilized to inservice District staff with respect to the planning process. As the planning and budgeting process becomes more institutionalized, it is anticipated that the number of professional staff in PRE that provide inservice training will increase. The program planning and budgeting process continues to be refined, and mid-stream adjustments in process may necessarily occur to respond appropriately to the needs of the District. Objective 3: To conduct educational research improving the teaching and learning process. PRE provides the results of the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) and other reports as identified above to appropriate building principals and various LRSD administrators. Administrative summaries, group skills analysis, and historical information with respect to the Stanford Achievement test are provided to building level and other LRSD administrators. The majority of special requests for information have centered around the SAT because of the role it plays in the assessment of LRSD students. PRE also compiled an analysis of the 1994 SAT test results, the 1994 AMPT test results, and the School Climate/Human Relations survey. 7 5 Discussion: PRE met the objective of conducting educational research to improve the teaching and learning process. The test and survey results that are shared with principals, LRSD administrators, and other LRSD staff should assist with improvements in the teaching and learning process if the findings from the reports are used. Requests for data and special reports related to the SAT test results appear to be on the increase and sometimes strain staff resources. Additional staff could be used to increase the extent of educational research that is conducted for the LRSD\nhowever, no recommendations will be forthcoming at this time to request additional staff. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Objective 1: The attainment of this goal is sometimes hampered by members of the local school biracial committee who cancel their monitoring visit. In such instances, PRE Evaluation Specialists have had to reschedule the site visit(s). Objective 2: Providing assistance that promotes the planning process will be refined over time as the process is institutionalized. This objective, with specific respect to the planning process, is at times hampered because of the time constraints and reliance on various administrators to submit information on a timely basis. For example, the PBD diskettes sometimes come in after a specified due date. It should be noted that Planning, Research, and Evaluation lost a secreterial position in the 1993-94 school year. It is expected, however, that further understanding of the planning process would help alleviate some of time crunch. District staff also need additional training in WordPerfect as it relates to the entry of data for the PBD. Objective 3: The extent to which educational research may be conducted by PRE is limited by current staff size. PRE does, however, provide technical assistance to other LRSD units as needed to help promote the District's overall educational research effort. Only one of PRE's six specialists is on a 12 month contract (4 are on a 10.5 and one is on an 11 month contract)\nas a result, educational research and/or the preparation of varying studies may be delayed until the fall semester begins. Recommendation(s) Recommendation 1: The Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department needs to conduct and/or coordinate continuous training with respect to the planning and budgeting process. Objective 1: To provide program managers and other District staff with the necessary understanding to further institutionalize the District's planning and budgeting process. Evaluation Criteria: PRE will plan and offer/coordinate program planning and budgeting workshops for appropriate staff. Required PBD information will be submitted in a timely L 6 manner consistent with information due dates. Expected Benefits: Program managers and District staff will have a greater understanding of the program planning and budgeting process. Information related to the overall cycle of the planning and budgeting process will be provided in a timely manner. Impact Analysis: Additional time will need to be scheduled for program managers or appropriate staff to attend the workshops where such information will be presented. This recommendation will have a positive effect on the Desegregation Plan as the concept of following a planning and budgeting process becomes more institutionalized. This recommendation is consistent with a court order requiring the District to conduct training sessions so that the planning and budgeting process may be more readily understood. Resources Analysis: No additional hiring of personnel is anticipated. Support staff from the Instructional Resource Center\nPlanning, Research and Evaluation\nand selected principals and administrators are the personnel of choice to assist with facilitation, training and presentations. Force Field Analysis: The primary supports of the recommendation will be those administrators most closely linked to the program planning and budgeting process. Likely detractors of the recommendation will be those in the District who view the planning process as cumbersome and time consuming (the Program Budget Document as one example). General Implementation Plan: Note: the following topics, time lines, and facilitator coordination represent a general implementation plan, as no specific dates are set. The Planning and Budgeting Process Program Evaluation Program Budget Document Business Cases Financial and Manpower Reports Word Perfect Training for Staff Spring \u0026amp; Fall Spring \u0026amp; Fall Fall Fall Fall Each semester Coordinate through PRE Coordinate through PRE Coordinate through PRE Coordinate through PRE Coordinate through PRE PRE Staff Note: Where possible, specific times and dates will be scheduled to coincide with times in the school year that are of specific or timely interest to the particular topic. Additional workshops may be added as needed. Recommendation 2: Increase utiliz.ation of the Planning, Research, and Evaluation professional 7 staff to conduct inservices or individualized training with respect to the planning and budgeting process. Objective 2: To increase utilization of PRE's professional staff with respect to providing inservice workshops or individualized assistance in relation to the District's planning and budgeting process. Evaluation Criteria: The number of professional PRE staff providing or ass1sung with inservice training on various aspects of the planning and budgeting process will increase over the 1993-94 level. Expected Benefits: Program managers and District staff will have a greater understanding of the program planning and budgeting process. Information related to the overall cycle of the planning and budgeting process will be provided in a timely manner. Impact Analysis: Additional time will need to be scheduled for program managers or appropriate staff to attend the workshops where such information will be presented. This recommendation will have a positive effect on the Desegregation Plan as the concept of following a planning and budgeting process becomes more institutionalized. This recommendation is consistent with a court order requiring the District to conduct training sessions so that the planning and budgeting process may be more readily understood. Resources Analysis: No additional hiring of personnel is anticipated. Force Field Analysis: The primary supports of the recommendation will be those administrators most closely linked to the program planning and budgeting process. Likely detractors of the recommendation will be those in the District who view the planning process as cumbersome and time consuming. General Implementation Plan: PRE Evaluation Specialists will be trained throughout the school year in varying aspects of the program planning and budgeting process. The Director of PRE will provide initial guidance in training personnel in the utilization of the process\nthe current Evaluation Specialist who is involved with the Program Budget Document and the Management Tool will serve as a peer tutor within the department. IN-DEPTH PROGRAM EVALUATION Program Description: Plant Services includes resources to identify, plan and execute maintenance/repair programs equitably so that Little Rock School District students can receive efficient, functional and effective education. Specifically, facilities includes maintenance programs to maintain/repair all District facilities in an equitable condition commensurate with financial resources and District priorities. Purpose: The purpose operation's necessary to critical as management. of the Plant Services is part of the base costs to maintain the buildings and grounds support the educational mission. This program is it encompasses all aspects of real property Scope and Content: The Plant Services Program encompasses the repair of all existing facilities, grounds and other real property, the maintenance thereof, new construction to support academic initiatives, all real estate actions to include leases, purchasing of property, selling of property, easements, grants, rights-of-way and licenses. It is extended to include the base operation costs of utility payments covering electric, water, gas, refuse, entomology and any other miscellaneous services. It includes long-range planning, responsibilities with regard to new construction, maintenance, acquisition and closing of facilities. Participants/Beneficiaries: The Plant Services Program is a base operations program that supports all persons that work for the Little Rock School District, are educated by its programs, or visits its facilities. Program Goals: To equitably maintain and academic programs, student support. Evaluation Criteria: repair facilities to support enrollment and administrative The evaluation criteria for the objectives listed in the Plant Ser~ices Program consists principally of historical records 1 indicating requests and completions of maintenance and repair work. They do not require a relative measure of success, but merely to report numbers of requests made and completions and the percent thereof. Evaluation Results: There is no measurable scale of success against which the evaluation can be made. The objectives reported in the Plant Services Program Budget Document, as stated previously, merely report the percent of completion of requests made of the program. There is no set goal that can be equated to measure this quantity. The amount of work completed has too many variables to establish a set percent to be achieved in any given reporting period. This is due to the complexity of the requests, the nature of the requests, the total number and the resources allocated to complete that goal, coupled with the priority. Objective U: To maintain all school facilities such that they are in a safe, operational condition to meet the academic needs of the various programs and to repair as necessary commensurate with resources. Discussion fl: This objective will never be met based on the level of funding that this Directorate presently received. The evaluation criteria is simply a tracking of the number of requests received against the number of requests completed. As more and more deficiencies are identified and more and more new work is identified to support academic programs, the disparity in funding will cause the percentage to decrease tremendously. Since the percentage reported on the program budget document only accounts for completion versus requests, and does not show the backlog and the subsequent monetary impact of that backlog, the way the Plant Services Report is established, it is of no useful value in the reporting procedure. Obstacles to Goal Attainment: There is one principal obstacle to the desired goal attainment of an equitable Facilities Program, and that is resources. The Plant Services Directorate is far below the national and regional averages, and as such, falls further behind as its backlog of maintenance and repair increases on a yearly basis. The amount of work identified district-wide to keep our buildings in a good 2 state of repair, and at an educational standard to support our programs, is mounting every year. With level or decreased funding each year, the backlog continues to increase. It is only through a higher funding level that we will be able to maintain our facilities to meet our operational needs. Recommendation: A careful evaluation of both the facilities and Plant Services' program would result in a recommendation that the Facilities Program be funded at a prescribed percent of the total district budget, this percent to be determined based on the regional and national average and a pre-determined decrease of the existing backlog of maintenance and repair. Only by clearly identifying how this backlog will be decreased, will we be able to establish a rate of success and a comparable measure thereof. A business case is recommended with this study, and the overall recommendation will likely result in an increase in the budget. DCE/rlh/pe2 3 Ii L. 1) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The program being evaluated as outlined in the nondesegregation portion of the Program Budget Document does not give an overall view of the Plant Services Program. The Program Budget Document merely responds to specific areas of concern and does not adequately see nor measure the program. The program is general engineering support to the entire district. As stated on page one (1) of this document, it encompasses all aspects of the engineering program to support the many facilities. It goes far beyond the specific item outlined in the Budget Document. - 2) The data that has been used to analyze this program is simply a tally of work order requests as made by the Facilities' Managers and as recorded by the Plant Services Directorate. All recommendations listed here are considered in the support area. DCE/rlh/pe2 4 Pupil Transportation Services Program Description: This program includes (1) the management, maintenance, and supervision of over 300 buses valued at more than eleven million dollars\n(2) the personnel management, training, and supervision of 334 employees\n(3) supervision of over 3,500 bus stops and 14,000 students while being transported daily to and from school\n(4) management of an annual budget of $7,354,396.24\n(5) providing transportation for field trips, athletic transportation and after school programs as requested by others. Historical data available at the Transportation Departmeflt were reviewed tor this report. Recommendation l: The Program Budget Document (PBD) for Pupil Transportation Services should be rewritten to utilize evaluation criteria that are reflective of performance standards. Area Classification: support Area Recommendation 2: outsource the student transportation system to a private concern. Area Classification: Support Area l Extended Evaluation Pupil Transportation Services Prog~am Description: Department provides transportation services to support basic academic programs, Special Ed Programs/Activities, and Athletics. Purpose: The purpose of Pupil Transportation Services is to provide transportation to and from school for students living in the LRSD who reside two miles or more from the school of assignment, to provide transportation for students with Individual Education Plans (IEP) identifying need for specialized transportation, and to support, extracurricular and co-curricular activities to the degree that resources will allow. Scope and Content: This program includes (1) the management, maintenance, and supervision of over 300 buses valued at more than eleven million dollars\n(2) the personnel management, training, and supervision of 334 employees\n(3) supervision of over 3,500 bus stops and 14,000 students while being transported daily to and from school\n(4) management of an annual budget of $7,354,396.24\n(5) providing transportation for field trips, athletic transportation and after school programs as requested by others. Participants/Beneficiaries: The primary beneficiaries are students who live more than two miles from their school of assignment. Other beneficiaries are students with courtesy stops, students who need transportation for field trips, athletic practices, and/or extended day programs. Program Goals: To provide safe, efficient and reliable transportation for the students of the Little Rock School District. Evaluation criteria: 1.0 Procurement request 1.1 Procurement request 1.2 Requisition signed 1.3 Buildings polled on materials recei ed 2.0 Report fleet requirements 2.1 Report fleet requirements 2.2 Report fleet requirements 2.3 First day routes printed 2.4 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 Report-Staffing (no evaluation criteria) (no evaluation criteria) Report year-end mileage Summer check sheets completed Summer check sheets completed Summer check sheets completed Summer check sheets completed Summer check sheets completed Checks entered in State Police Log Summer check sheets completed All buses identified by route transported All buses identified for auction memo to procurement State Board Log sheets submitted Evaluation Results: The overall transportation system failed but that will not be reflected in evaluation results because the evaluation criteria do not establish performance expectations. Performance criteria should include as a minimum, on-time to school, number of bus breakdowns, number of chargeable accidents, attendance rate for drivers, and number buses available daily. ODjective 1.0: To conduct routine office functions. Discussion 1. o: All forms such as bus cards, discipline reports, and time sheets were obtained and distributed to the school by supervisors. These were received later than normal due to the lateness of the decision on outsourcing. ODjective 2.0: To maintain an appropriate operational fleet. Discussion 2.0: The fleet requirements are determined by the number of routes to be run at the same time. This requirement must be adjusted based upon the number of drivers funded by the budget. If only 260 drivers are available, then 260 buses will be required even if 275 buses are required by the number of established routes. The balancing depends on the number of buses available in the fleet and the number of drivers authorized. Last year, 281 buses were in the fleet. No new buses were added. The personnel count of drivers and aides was fixed at 311. The number of drivers in the ?econd semester never reached the allocated 273 drivers. As a result, routes were late due to not enough drivers. To be a Bus Driver, a person must hold a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) with a school endorsement. Even though potential drivers completed training, they had to wait up to one month to be tested by the State Police. This is a continuing problem in maintaining the appropriate number of drivers. Objective 3.0: To maintain appropriate vehicle servicing. Discussion 3. o: The fleet is aging. No replacement plan exists. New buses are bought when money is available. Although all buses passed inspection, buses continue to breakdown and require extensive maintenance that is not covered by warranties. This increases the cost in operating the fleet. In order to keep a fleet in good operational order, a replacement plan should be implemented to insure that all buses will be available most of the time. The district puts more than four million miles on buses annually. If the standard of replacing a bus every 150,000 miles is maintained, then the district should plan to replace 27 buses each year or markedly reduce the number of miles put on the buses annually. In order to reduce the number of miles _placed on buses means that services need to reduced in serving field trips, athletics and extended day or charge these programs for replacement of the buses. The length of routes and the number of routes must be reduced and/or money set aside for replacement buses in relation to the number of miles used annually. Obstacles to Goal Attainment Ol:\u0026gt;jective 1: To conduct routine office functions. Based upon the evaluation criteria in the Program Budget Document, this objective was achieved. Objective 2: To maintain an appropriate operational fleet. Based on the evaluation criteria, this objective was achieved. However, strategy 2.5 hire and train new drivers did not have evaluation criteria which should have been as a minimum maintaining a driver count of at least 273 drivers. This strategy failed in the spring of 1994 due to a shortage of at least 40 drivers. Therefore, the Objective 2 failed to maintain an appropriate operational fleet. Objective 3: To maintain appropriate vehicle servicing. Based on the evaluation criteria this objective was achieved. However, due to the age of the fleet, the current maintenance staff was unable to keep up with repairs needed to keep a sufficient number of buses available to support the routing system. Therefore, the appropriate vehicle servicing was not maintained during the school year and this objective was not achieved. Recommendations: The Pupil Transportation Services Program Budget Document (PBD) Evaluation Criteria are not appropriate evaluation criteria. Manpower shortages and equipment failure due to age caused the Pupil Transportation Services to fail to meet the stated program goal. Recommendation 1: The Program Budget Document (PBD) for Pupil Transportation Services should be rewritten to utilize evaluation criteria that are reflective of performance standards. Evaluation criteria: The new criteria will include, but not limited to, attendance rate for drivers, rate of vacancies, rate of employees on long term leave, rate of drivers on light duty, number of buses available daily, number of wrecker pulls, number of buses over 100,ooo/1so,ooo number of miles to support extracurricular and co-curricular activities, number of miles to support regular transportation by route, number of chargeable accidents per million miles, number of workman compensation claims, per-cent of not-on-time buses, and number of patron/parent complaints by category. Expected Benefits: These kinds of evaluation criteria will allow the district to establish realistic improvement goals for the Transportation Department. Impact Analysis: Negatives: 1. The change from the current PBD to the new one would be obvious. 2. Some individuals may not want to deal with data that shows whether or not the Department is doing a good job. Positives: 1. Facts will be available to evaluate the department. 2. Decisions can be made on facts rather than on what we feel is true. 3. The actual costs to support various activities will be easy to calculate. 4. Action plans for improvement can be developed and evaluated objectively. I l I ', ,1 ,1 !\n, 11 I' !! I' I' I' 11 I'  II I ' 111 Risks: The risk of not implementing this solution is to ignore the Dneeepda rttmo ehnat.v e clear planning guidance for the Transportation Timing: The rewrite should take place before the January report, so administrators have the information available to assist in decision making in the Spring of 1995. Resource Analysis: Personnel: No additional personnel will be required. Time of the administrators to gather the base data will be required but could be accomplished by reporting time. Financial: No additional cost will be required. Force Field Analysis: The Director of Transportation will welcome the opportunity to mdeavkeinlogp. a PBD that is based on data needed for decisionThose most opposed to the solution are those who want to keep the actual costs of extra curricular, co-curricular and athletic transportation hidden in the Transportation Department budget. General Zmplementation Plan: Milestone Direct Transportation to rewrite PBD Write PBD Review PBD Submit PBD with appropriate report Date 12/21/94 01/6/94 01/09/94 01/13/94 Recommendation 2: Outsource the system to a private concern. Person Clowers Cheatham Mayo Cheatham student transportation Expected Benefits: The district could save one million dollars or more. I Impact Analysis: The district is aware of the concern that exists among the bus drivers. The concern expressed has focused on job security. Those who have appeared in protest are those who will remain with the district anyway. The district will maintain special education routes and therefore about 80 drivers and aides. The proposal for outsourcing requires that those currently employed by the LRSD be employed by the contractor. Negatives: 1. The transition to a private contractor will require extra time for district administrators to turn over the operation which will no doubt have unpredictable inconveniences\n2. Bus driver reaction will be strong against the decision for fear of the loss of their jobs\nPositives: 1. Parent satisfaction will increase as indicated by a reduction in the number of complaints\n2. Currently employed drivers will maintain their jobs and benefits\n3. Buses will be on-time more often than they are now\n4. Accidents will decrease\n5. The number of buses out-of-service for repairs will decrease\n6. The cost of student transportation for the next three years will be less than that projected by LRSD\nand, 7. A schedule for replacement of equipment will be strictly followed providing students with badly needed new buses. Risks The risks of not implementing this solution is increasing costs to the district, increasing complaints by patrons, and a generally poor image of the district's transportation system. The risks of implementation of this solution are the unfounded presumptions that the costs will be greater than calculated and people will lose their jobs. Transition will strain our current management capability considering increased activities associated with the start up of the school year. ' I I I ' I ', I' II I 11.: ' ' I ' ,I I I I Timing It is critical that the decision be made before February 1, 1995 so it may be implemented by the opening of school for 1995-96. If this solution is to be implemented, patrons will need to know when the Board of Directors approves. Awareness must be generated in the community, staff must be identified of the change, and a number of other task as noted in the timeline included must be addressed. Resource Analysis: Personnel No additional costs for personnel are necessary to implement this proposal. No one will lose his or her job, however. Financial A savings of 1 million dollars is the estimated benefit over the next three years under this plan. The District will maintain the special education routes and a smaller maintenance facility already available. Even with these costs, outsourcing will reduce overall costs. Revenue Source The money normally allocated will be used to pay for outsourcing. Implementation of this proposal creates a yearto- year cost-reducing strategy for the 1995-96 budget. Force Field Analysis: Primary supporters of this proposal will be those directly affected by the solution - patrons and administrators within the District. The Board of Directors and administration of the school district are aware of the improvement this solution will bring for student service. Those more opposed to the solution will be the bus drivers who fear losing their jobs and those who fear private sector managing public sector services. The negative reaction may be reduced by keeping everyone informed as the decision is made and implemented. The strongest statement in favor of oursourcing is that service will improve while reducing costs. - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT EXTENDED PROGRAM BUDGET EVALUATION PROGRAM NAME: PURCHASING SERVICES, NON-DESEGREGATION FOR YEAR 9394 Program Description: The Procurement Department is organized to administer a centralized procurement function in the accomplishment of the acquisition of materials, services, and equipment in support of District operations in the most efficient, effective, and economical manner possible. The Centralized Procurement and Materials Management function interacts with all segments of the District. Purpose: The purpose of this program is to aid the Procurement Department in implementing, revising, and evaluating purchasing, property accounting, central warehouse operations, and property disposal procedures in order to best serve the District. Scope and Content: The program encompasses several functions that are the responsibility of the Procurement Department. These general functions include: Coordinating all District purchases of equipment, supplies, and services in such a manner that the maximum value will be obtained for the money expended\nEstablishing, administering, and coordinating central materials management encompassing property accounting and property disposal and\nOperating the Central Warehouse in an efficient and effective manner to assure prompt delivery and availability of frequently used supplies and materials utilized by schools/departments within the District. Participants/Beneficiaries: The beneficiaries of this program are all schools and departments within the District, vendors in the business community, district patrons and taxpayers. Program Goals: Support schools and administrative offices through cost effective procurement and efficient handling of all materials.  Evaluation Criteria: 1.1 Document recommendations and approved changes to the organizational structure of the department. 2.1 Copies of certification certificates are to be included in an employees personnel file. 3.1 Maintain a log of all vendor office visits. 1 I 17 l Ii 'I I I I 1' II ! I I : I I 1, I l I t I I I !: 1, I I l lW Evaluation Criteria (continued): 3.2 Document in bid files all specification changes and recommendations for change. (Requested to be removed per instructions in Dr. Mayo's memo dated 10/24/94) 4.1 Document attempts to identify shortcomings and defects with the current automated system in continued efforts to obtain a modern, professional purchasing management system. 5.1 Procurement Director to provide written recommendation. 5.2 Document verification of completed inventories. 6.1 Monitor user suggestions on order and delivery of supplies. 6.2 Suggestion from available to all schools/departments. 6.3 Monitor historical levels of inventory and correct as needed. 7.1 Monitor user suggestions on order and delivery of forms. 7.2 Request to the Procurement Director for the addition 4o the inventory of new standardized forrn(s). Evaluation Results: OBJECTIVE 1: REFINE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TO EFFECTIVELY ACCOMPLISH ALL FUNCTIONS REQUIRED OF A CENTRALIZED PROCUREMENT AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT OPERATION. DISCUSSION: Procurement filled a custodial position in November of 1993. custodian works 1/2 day at Procurement five days a week. The selection process for this position is documented and on file in the Department. No other changes were made in 93-94. OBJECTIVE MET. OBJECTIVE 2: HAVE ALL BUYER POSITIONS BECOME FAMILIAR WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED PURCHASING PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES. DISCUSSION: Two employees, Darral Paradis and Gretchen Spinelli, successfully completed the course work and examination to receive certification from NIGP (National Institute of Governmental Purchasing) as CPPB's (Certified Professional Public Buyers) in July of 1994. All buyers in the Department now have this national certification. 2 Evaluation Results (continued): In addition, Charles Neal, Procurement Director, served on the Board of Directors, and Gail Hester was chairperson of the membership committee for the Arkansas Chapter of NIGP. OBJECTIVE MET. OBJECTIVE 3 : EVALUATE NEW PRODUCTS AND SEEK TO OBTAIN THE MAXIMUM ULTIMATE VALUE FOR EACH PURCHASING DOLLAR EXPENDED. DISCUSSION: No evaluation results\nvendor log project is continuing into 1995. This cannot be fully implemented until the Department completes a planned mass mailing of vendor applications to businesses on our current vendor list. The purpose of this mailing would be to allow potential vendors an opportunity to identify comrnodi ty i terns they have available for sale. This information would then be put in the Automated Procurement Management System so that when the District is in need of a particular commodity, a listing of potential vendors could be made imrnediately available. Shortfalls in the current system have not allowed for this mailing to be accomplished. In addition, Procurement requested that strategy 3.2 be removed per instructions provided in Dr. Mayo's letter dated 10/24/94. This strategy is a routine operating function within the Department. OBJECTIVE NOT MET. OBJECTIVE 4: ENHANCE DEPARTMENT PRODUCTIVITY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CAPABILITY BY UTILIZING A FULLY AUTOMATED PROCUREMENT, INVENTORY, AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. DISCUSSION: A complete analysis of shortcomings in the current purchasing system has been completed by the Procurement Department. An outside consultant is currently working on enhancements which we have as a goal to be on line by the end of the 94-95 fiscal year. The current system does not provide purchasing management with performance information necessary to effectively aid the Department in decision making. When needed, this information is gathered manually. Some examples of needed system information are: 1) Cost savings as a result of competitive bidding\n2) average dollar amount of purchase orders\n3) number of purchase orders processed per month by commodity and by dollar amount\n4) number of active vendors and\n5) average time from requisition receipt to delivery, etc. OBJECTIVE NOT COMPLETELY MET, WORK IS IN PROGRESS. 3 l Evaluation Results (continued): OBJECTIVE 5: PROVIDE TOTAL PROPERTY ACCOUNTING AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT FOR THE DISTRICT FROM INITIAL ACQUISITION TO FINAL SALVAGE DISPOSITION. DISCUSSION: Procurement has developed a list of deficiencies in the current CIMS software relating to fixed assets programs. An outside consultant is currently performing a review of this list and will be working with us to develop enhancements to meet our needs. This work is about 70% completed. For instance, summary management reports are not available at this time that give the total number and types of assets and associated dollar amounts for specific sites in the District. currently to determine this information, an entire site inventory is run and the desired data is manually sorted. The fixed asset property accounting section performed physical inventories at Stephens and Ish Elementary schools because of anticipated closings. NO other schools were inventoried due mainly to computer software problems encountered with the fixed assets module of CIMS, plus shortage of staff to validate physical inventories at each site in a timely and effective manner. It's imperative that the District, at any given time, have accurate information available detailing assets on-hand at all sites. The Chicot Elementary fire illustrates this point as the asset information maintained by the Procurement Department was provided to the insurance companies to aid in loss evaluation. The Department currently relies on school/department personnel to verify the assets recorded in the property system. NO validations of these inventories are made by Procurement due to lack of personnel as mentioned above. This objective is not being met due mainly to computer system deficiencies and shortage of staff. In order to fully accomplish this objective, these two areas must be addressed. A prograrraning consultant is being used to address the system problems and the personnel issue may develop into a business case. The computer system deficiencies have been identified and corrective measures approved and are presently in progress. The personnel position is that of a property accounting secretary and has previously been approved but hiring has not been initiated. 4 Evaluation Results (continued): OBJECTIVE 6: MAINTAIN A CENTRAL WAREHOUSE OF COMMONLY USED OFFICE AND INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES UTILIZED BY THE DISTRICT. In maintaining the warehouse, emphasis is placed on attaining maximum efficiency while maintaining effectiveness. In this regard, the Procurement Department has a goal to deliver requested school/office supplies within 48 hours of receipt of electronic requisitions from schools/departments\nhowever, the current system does not provide the capability to accumulate the information to measure this goal. This problem will be corrected with program enhancements planned for installment by the end of the 94-95 fiscal year. Since Procurement initiated electronic requisitioning in 1992-93, the number of requisitions received has been dramatically reduced due primarily to the schools/departments on-line requisitioning capability. Prior to 1992-93, all schools/departments typed their supply center requisitions. Requisitions were forwarded when created to Procurement via inter-office mail. This usually resulted in several a day depending on staff requests received by the school/department bookkeeper. Electronic requisitioning allows schools/departments to accumulate their request on one system requisition throughout the day. This electronic request is then processed by Procurement on-line the next work day. The chart below reflects this trend: Number of warehouse Requisitions Processed School Year 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 # of Requisitions 11,372 11,221 4,568 5,000 5 ,, ,.....,.. Ii I l i, I ' 1, l I i I l I 1, ,1 II Ii I 1, i 11 Evaluation Results (continued): The Procurement Department received five (5) requests/suggestions from schools/departments for new product additions to the warehouse during 93/94. All five were added to the supply center inventory as new catalogue items. The chart below reflects the total number of products carried in the supply center over the last four years and our progress in reducing uneconomical inventory: School Year 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 Total Number of Stock Items Carried 896 852 843 819 The Procurement Department has reduced supply center inventory costs to more economical levels each year. The chart below reflects ending inventory values over the last four years:  School Year 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 Ending Inventory Amount $ 345,879 362,531 319,030 308,997 DISCUSSION: Overall, this objective is being met with varying degrees of efficiency and economy. However, there are computer system deficiencies that restrict the retrieval of management information to enhance the achievement of this objective. In order to fully accomplish this objective, these data gathering deficiencies must be corrected. A prograrmning consultant is currently being used to review the system problem. Solutions are planned to be installed by the end of the 94-95 fiscal year. 6 I II I ,I . .... Evaluation Results (continued): OBJECTIVE 7: MAINTAIN A CENTRAL WAREHOUSE OF FREE-PRINTED FORMS UTILIZED BY THE DISTRICT. The Procurement Department received requests from schools/departments for six new printed forms to be added to inventory during 93/94. All six were added to the inventory. DISCUSSION: Objective met. Obstacles to Goal Attainment: 1. Objective Achieved. 2. Objective Achieved. 3. Objective Not Achieved. Project is ongoing into 94-95. 4. Objective Not Achieved. Project is ongoing into 94-95. 5. Objective Not Achieved. The Department is currently 70% complete in evaluating the current system for improvements required to fully accomplish this goal. This evaluation is expected to be completed by fiscal year end 1995. Also, shortage of staff has not allowed Procurement to validate physical inventories at schools/departments. Procurement has one (1) employee to accomplish all property accounting for the District including validation of school/department inventories. Procurement currently relies on school/department personnel to verify assets for their locations. Work backlog is a problem in several other key Property Accounting responsibility areas due to the shortage of staff. These areas include: a) Inputing asset data into the Fixed Asset System\nb) tagging new assets\nc) preparing for surplus property sales\nd) coordinating and accounting for excess property inter-district movements and\ne) accounting for donated property to the District. 6. Objective Not Achieved. Procurement is currently 70% complete in evaluating the current computerized inventory system for improvements needed in order to fully accomplish this goal. This evaluation is expected to be completed by fiscal year end 1995. 7. Objective Achieved. 7 Ii I I I 1, I II I ,I I I II I I! 11, I I II ' I I Recommendations: Recommendation 1: There are several areas under the Procurement Department's responsibility where procedural changes should be addressed. A new objective regarding these procedural changes should be added to our program budget document. These changes are required to improve the effectiveness and efficiencies of purchasing within the District. Objective 1: Define, develop, and implement relevant purchasing procedures and measures to enhance those functions required of an effective and efficient centralized procurement and materials management operation. This objective is needed in order to introduce cost containment and savings measures, improve relations with vendors, and lessen the potential for fiscal abuse. Several strategies would need to be added to this objective: 1. Delegate approval for local purchases under a predetermined dollar amount and guidelines to the school/department level (This constitutes spending approval only and does not eliminate the requirement for a written purchase order). 2. Incorporate activity fund purchases with vendors into the District's Centralized Automated Procurement system. 3. Develop procedures and dollar limits by which employees may be reimbursed for certain incidental expenditures. 4. Incorporate an invoice pre-audit function within the Department to verify contractual terms, conditions, and prices plus reduce the time required for payment of vendor invoices. Evaluation Criteria: The following would be the corresponding evaluation criteria for each new strategy previously listed. 1. Compare the number of purchase orders prepared by Centralized Procurement with the number of local small purchase orders prepared by school/departments. (If effective, the number of purchase orders prepared by Procurement should decrease and reduce the time required for schools/departments to make local small dollar purchases). 2. Purchasing transactions with vendors are documented with a standard District purchase order. 3. Monitor the number of reimbursement requisitions received by Procurement with previous years. This number should be reduced as a result of implementing this procedure. 8 Evaluation Criteria (continued): 4. Monitor contractual terms, conditions, and pricing plus measure time elapsed between receipt of goods and payment. (Also, verify that vendor invoices are mailed to Procurement). Expected Benefits: There are several benefits that would result if these changes were implemented: 1) More purchasing flexibility for schools/departments for local small dollar purchases. 2) Reduced paperwork, i.e., schools/departments would prepare on-site a local purchase order for small dollar purchases directly to vendor. 3) Vendors will receive one uniform purchase order from the district regardless of the fund being utilized. 4) Reimbursement to employees would be streamlined. 5) Reduced handling of invoices by mailing to one central location. 6) Days elapsed between receipt of goods and payment would be reduced. 7) Take advantage of vendor early payment discounts. 8) Improve relations with business community. 9) Greater utilization of Centralized Procurement System 10) Establishes more positive control over spending discipline. 11) Reduces the potential for improper spending practices. IMPACT ANALYSIS: These proposed changes would have no effect on the desegregation plan or court orders. There are political factors to overcome in that areas of responsibi1ity would be shifted from one department to another in some cases. Some risks associated with not implementing these procedures would be 1) continuing danger of deteriorating relations with the business community and 2) continuing danger of fiscal improprieties or improper expenditure of public funds. In order to successfully implement in a timely manner, some detailed coordination with user groups will be required. RESOURCES ANALYSIS: These proposed changes would require no changes in staffing to the Procurement Department. Training would be minimal and conducted in-house. FOR.CE FIELD ANALYSIS: The majority of Schools/Departments are in favor of these changes. A few principals may perceive the changes in activity fund procedures as an attempt by Procurement to control these funds. some personnel in the Business Office may also be reluctant to make changes. Procurement plans to overcome these obstacles by having group sessions involving affected users to discuss shortcomings, potential pitfalls, and benefits. The goal Will be to stress the changes as improving efficiency and Productivity for the entire District. 9 GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: Following are the proposed timelines for implementation: 1/95 - 2/95 3/95 3/95 - 4/95 3/95 - 4/95 4/95 - 5/95 6/95 7/95 7/95 Activity Meet with Business Office personnel to discuss proposed changes Pre-audit function implemented Meet with principal advisory council to review procedural changes Update procedure manual Train LRSD personnel on local purchase order Implement local purchase order process Incorporate activity fund purchases with District's centralized automated procurement system Implement revised employee reimbursement procedure Business Case is recommended ___yes _x_no Person(s) Responsible Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Controller Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Controller Director of Procurement Director of Procurement Purchasing Supervisors Director of Procurement Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Controller Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Controller Plan Modification is recommended _x_yes __ no Overall recommendations are likely to have what type of budgetary impact: No budgetary impact _x_ Increased costs Decreased costs 10 ROCKEFELLER EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION MAGNET PROGRAM Program Description: Purpose: Scope and Content: The purpose of the program is to meet the growing needs of disadvantaged students and to improve the racial balance at schools that are difficult to desegregate by incorporating Early Childhood Education programs into the elementary schools. The program provides experiences for young children which meet their needs and stimulate learning in all developmental areas- physical, social, emotional, and intellectual. Priority for identification of program sites will be given to areas that have a very high concentration of low income students and in schools that are difficult to desegregate. The Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Program will be available to children from ages six weeks to four years old. The program will serve as a model for improving the academic achievement of disadvantaged students and attracting students to comply with desegregation reguirements. To provide a unique opportunity to explore and develop excellent early childhood education services to children and parents by providing complete continuity of education and childcare from early infancy through grade six. The program serves as a demonstration center for training college students as well as for inservice observation. Rockefeller Early Childhood Program operates 12 months of the year, Monday through Friday, from 7 a.m. until 5:30 p.m., with the exception of holidays. A fee of $60.00 per week is charged for students between the ages of six weeks and three years old. There is no charge for the four-year-old program during regular school hours (7:55 a.m. - 2:35 p.m.). The developmental program revolves around an active learning philosophy with a full spectrum of activities designed to stimulate children at different levels of development. The program is licensed by the Department of Human Services. It is staffed with certified early childhood teachers and has the following teacher/child ratio: 6 weeks to 24 months - 1 adult to every 2 children A total of 5.50 adults for 10 children. 24 months to 36 months - 1 adult to every 4 children A total of 4.50 adults for 17 children. 36 months - 1 adult to every 6 children A total of 3 adults for 18 children. Snacks are served in the mornings and in the afternoons and well-balanced hot meals are available through food services. l I I ii I j I I II II I It I I I I  I 11 I I I Rockefeller Early Childhoood Education Magnet Program Page 2 Participants/ Beneficiaries: Program Goals: Evaluation Criteria: The participants served Childhood Magnet program identified as being between through the Rockefeller Early are students who have been the ages of six weeks and four years old. October 1 is the date used for student placements. To meet the needs of disadvantaged students and to improve racial balance in schools that are difficult to desegregate. The early childhood education program at Rockefeller School will capitalize upon the school's high quality early childhood education as a desegregation tool. The Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Program evaluation will consist of the following evaluation criteria: 1. Documentation of academic achievement and enrollment. 2. Partnership agreements developed between Rockefeller, U.A.L.R., and area colleges. 3. Documentation showing the use of Rockefeller for: 4. Training, lnservices, and Observations. Documentation showing the program receives the same attention as K-6 in: supervision, support, staff development, resource allotments, accountability, monitoring, and evaluation. 5. Number of children staying in the program. 6. The number of siblings attending Rockefeller K-6. 7. 8. 9. Documentation of meetings to review policies and recommendations made. Classroom observations, monitoring reports and documentation of work sessions. Documentation of inservice and orientation for parents. 10. Documentation of inservice evaluations. 11. Documentation of Task Force meetings. I Rockefeller Early Childhoood Education Magnet Program Page 3 Evaluation Results: Objective 1 : Discussion 1: E.P.S.F. Evaluation results reflect data gathered from several sources. These data have been compiled and analyzed and yield the following results. To establish Rockefeller as academic achievement of attracting students to requirements. a model for disadvantaged comply with improving the students and desegregation 1 . Documentation of academic achievement and enrollment. An analysis of students who participated in compared to students who did not participate in using Post E.P.S.F. results, eligibility, and in the K-3 Summer School program. the program the program participation According to the E.P.S.F. 1993-94 Post Assessment findings of 40 kindergarten children at Rockefeller School the following is a analysis of 32 students who participated in the program compared to eight students who did not participate i\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1212","title":"Little Rock School District School Staffing Detail, Little Rock School District Information Services,","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Information Services--Arkansas--Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School employees","School administrators","School principals"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District School Staffing Detail, Little Rock School District Information Services,"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1212"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nJU 1 4 1996 Office of Desegreg.,tion Mon:toring Little Rock School District SCHOOL STAFFING DETAIL LRSD Information Services DISTRICT SCHOOL STAFFING DETAIL REPORT l 7-Apr-96 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 94 BADGETT 186.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 MOORE, Sf-IlRLEY J 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R CATEGORY TOTALS: ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 01 ALBERT, REJEANA J 01 CAMPBELL, ETIIEL J 01 CHILDS, SANDRA D 01 MCGOWAN, DORIS J 01 MCLENNAN, ANNE 01 SINGER, PATRICIA B 01 TRAYLOR, KA Tl-ILEEN A 01 TRIMBLE, BETTY J 01 WOOD, CRYSTAL A CATEGORY TOTALS: GUIDANCE 01 GREGORY, PATRICIA A CATEGORY TOTALS: LIB/AV. 01 WATSON, MERLYN F CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHER PROF. 02 MAHAN, MARSHAL CATEGORY TOTALS: PRIN 01 GOLSTON, MARY R CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 06 ADAMS, JANET L 06 KOVACH, LILLIAN R Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 0.40 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.10 JOB CODE SEC PRIN MEDIA CL ELEMV ELEM III ELEMVI ELEM! ELEM II ELEM IV 4 YR OLD ELEM VI KINDER-REG CNSLR-ELEM LIBRN-ELEM NURSE ELE PRIN MATH-CI-IP I MATH SPEC SALARY $15,229.39 $5 ,372.40 $20,601.79 $36,876.00 $25,695 .00 $30,733.00 $36,876.00 $30,512.00 $34,467.00 $195,159.00 $30,733.00 $30,733.00 $34,540.67 $34,540.67 $4,978.4Q $4,978.40 $57,067.14 $57,067.14 $16,268.00 $3,125.50 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 PACK, JANET E 0.60 G\u0026amp;T $16,344.00 01 PEARSON, BOYCE 0.50 MUSIC $17,233.50 01 PRUITT, GAYLA R 1.00 SPE-M-HAND $24,892.00 06 ROWE,MARYM 0.80 READING $26,513.60 01 VALUE, TERRIL 0.50 SPEECH $15,627.50 01 WY A TT, JANICE K 0.50 SPE-N/CATG $12,817.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.40 $132,821.60 SERV.WKRS. 02 MCCRUEL, LESLIE L 1.00 CUST-HEAD $14,342.00 02 WILLIAMS, LARRY L 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,229.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $23,571.00 TCHR.AIDES 02 GRAY, KATHRYN M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,837.04 02 MERRILL, ANNETTE M 0.40 LAB ATTEND $4,164.40 02 PHILLIPS, THELMA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,837.04 02 SCRUB BS JR, WALTER 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 WATSON, MURIEL C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.40 $36,660.48 YEARLY TOTALS: 24.40 $536,133.08 95 BADGETT 180.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 MOORE, SHIRLEY J 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,719.88 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R 0.40 MEDIA CL $5,721.62 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $21,441.50 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 ALBERT, REJEANA J 1.00 ELEMV $28,043 .0Q 01 CAMPBELL,ETHELJ 1.00 ELEM III $37,221 .00 01 DANIEL, SUSAN J 1.00 KINDER-REG $23,443.00 01 MCGOWAN, DORIS J 1.00 ELEM I $31,832.00 01 MCLENNAN, ANNE 1.00 ELEM IT $37,221.00 01 PARR,LISA Y 1.00 4 YR OLD $21,883.00 01 SINGER, PATRICIA B 1.00 ELEM IV $31,609.00 01 TRAYLOR, KATHLEEN A 1.00 4 YR OLD $35,600.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This re11ort does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSl) 1-NVORMA\"l'\\ON S\\l.RV\\C\\l. l)\\l.P\"l'. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 2 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 01 TRIMBLE, BETTY J 1.00 ELEM VI $35,600.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.00 $282,452.00 GUIDANCE 01 GREGORY, PATRICIA A 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $31,832.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $31,832.00 LIB/AV. 01 POSITION,VACANT 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 OTHER PROF. 02 JANSSEN, MARY JANE 0.20 NURSE $3,009.92 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.20 $3,009.92 PRIN 01 GOLSTON, MARY R 1.00 ELEPRlN $58,502.38 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $58,502.38 SEC.CLSRM.TCH. 06 ADAMS, JANET L 0.40 MATH-CHPI $16,420.40 06 CRAWFORD, CARMELIA A 0.10 MATH SPEC $3,290.50 01 GUNDERMAN, JANICE G 1.00 SPE-N/CATG 01 JOHNSON, BONITA ANN 0.40 G\u0026amp;T 01 PEARSON, BOYCE 0.60 MUSIC $21,360.00 01 PRUITT, GAYLA R 1.00 SPE-M-HAND $17,290.00 06 ROWE,MARYM 0.60 READING $20,557.80 01 VALUE, TERRI L 0.50 SPEECH $16,179.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.60 $95,097.70 SERV.WKRS. 02 MCCRUEL, LESLIE L 1.00 CUST-HEAD $14,784.00 02 WILLIAMS, LARRY L 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,539.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $24,323.00 TCHR.AIDES 02 BARNES, KENNETH 1.00 AIDE-4YR $11,255.14 02 GRAY, KATHRYN M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,903.37 02 MERRILL, ANNETTE M 0.40 LAB ATTEND $3,511.60 02 PHILLIPS, THELMA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,903.37 02 SCRUBBS JR, WALTER 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 06 SNOWDEN, KIMBERLY A 1.00 AIDE-SP ED $2,296.32 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 3 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 WATSON, MURIEL C 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.40 $49,691.80 YEARLY TOTALS: 26.60 $566,350.31 96 BADGETT 215.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R 0.40 MEDIA CL $5,823.32 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 SEC PRIN CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $5,823.32 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. OJ ALBERT, REJEANA J 1.00 ELEMV $28,853.00 01 CAMPBELL, ETI-IEL J 1.00 ELEM ID $38,031.00 OJ DANIEL, SUSAN J 1.00 KINDER-REG $24,254.00 OJ MCGOWAN, DORIS J 1.00 ELEM I $32,642.00 OJ MCLENNAN,ANN E 1.00 ELEM II $38,031.00 OJ PARKER, TAMMY L 1.00 KINDER-REG $10,764.19 OJ PARR, LISA Y 1.00 4 YR OLD $22,693.00 OJ SINGER, PATRICIA B 1.00 ELEM JV $32,419.00 OJ TRAYLOR, KA TIILEEN A 1.00 4YROLD $36,411.00 OJ TRIMBLE, BETTY J 1.00 ELEM VI $36,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 10.00 $300,509.19 GUIDANCE OJ GREGORY, PATRICIA A 0.80 CNS LR-ELEM $26,113.60 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.80 $26,113.60 LIB/AV. OJ WAKELYN, JOAN 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $28,773.29 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $28,773.29 OTHER PROF. 02 JANSSEN, MARY JANE 0.20 NURSE $3,501.28 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.20 $3,501.28 PRIN OJ GOLSTON, MARY R 1.00 ELE PRIN $59,592.95 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $59,592.95 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. OJ GUNDERMAN, JANICE G 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $22,693.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. '-,R.S-0 ,NVOR.l'J\\\"-,:,oN S\\l.RV,c\\l. l\u0026gt;\\l.\\\u0026gt;'T. Sa.\\a.1 .. y = 'Base Sa.\\ary + Sti1lc.nds(docs not include \\1cncfits) 4 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 JOHNSON, BONITA ANN 0.40 G\u0026amp;T $10,050.00 01 NORMAN, ANN C 0.40 MUSIC $14,134.80 01 PRUITT, GAYLA R 1.00 SPE-M-HAND $26,746.00 01 VALUE, TERRI L 0.50 SPEECH $16,584.50 06 WROTEN, MYRTHENE R 0.50 MATH-CJ-IP! $16,858.00 06 WROTEN, MYRTHENE R 0.50 MATH-CHP I $16,858.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.30 $123,924.30 SERV.WKRS. 02 MCCRUEL, LESLIE L 1.00 CUST-HEAD $15,264.00 02 WILLIAMS, LARRY L 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $25,171.00 TCHR.AIDES 02 BARNES, KENNETH 1.00 AIDE-4YR $11 ,527.57 02 GRAY, KATHRYN M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,040.43 02 HARPER, KA TINA ERICA 0.40 LAB ATTEND $3,849.26 02 PHILLIPS, THELMA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,040.43 02 SCRUBBS JR, WALTER 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663 .00 06 SNOWDEN, KIMBERLY A 1.00 AIDE-SP ED $10,407.00 02 UWADINEKE, NNANTA C 1.00 AIDE-SP ED $10,411.00 02 WATSON, MURIEL C 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 7.40 $69,601.69 YEARLY TOTALS: 28.10 $643,010.62 94 BALE 297.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 HENDRICKS, LUCY M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R 0.40 MEDIA CL $5 ,372.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $22,567.05 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BRANCH, MARTHA A 1.00 ELEM! 01 BROWN, CLARA J 1.00 ELEM I $28,104.00 01 CONLEY, FRANCES J 1.00 ELEM II $24,892.00 01 DOCKERY, MAE K 1.00 ELEMV $31 ,255.00 01 GADDY, ELLISTINE 1.00 ELEM IV $36,876.00 Note: EmJJloyees with no salary are not currently active on JJayroll. This reJJort does not include, MetrOJJOlitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all emJJloyees currently active on JJayroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ StiJJends(does not include benefits) 5 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 01 GEURIN, RAMONA 0 1.00 KINDER-REG $34,467.00 01 HUTTO, MARYE 1.00 KINDER-REG $33,945.00 01 JACKSON JR, JOSEPH 1.00 ELEM VI $37,157.00 01 JOHNSON, CARTHORIA 1.00 4 YR OLD $35,009.00 01 JOHNSON, DELMA J 1.00 ELEM III $34,246.00 01 POSITION, OPEN 1.00 ELEMV 01 ROGERS, CHARLENE I 1.00 KINDER-REG $38,763.00 01 SINGH, DONNA F 1.00 ELEM VI 01 TALLEY, HELEN J 1.00 ELEM II $32,359.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 14.00 $367,073.00 GUIDANCE 01 ROUSE, WARREN J 0.80 CNS LR-ELEM $29,500.80 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.80 $29,500.80 LIB/AV. 01 SCHOFIELD, SANDRA 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $37,836.31 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,836.31 OTHER PROF. 02 GIBSON, JOCELYN M 0.40 NURSE $4,219.09 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $4,219.09 PRlN 01 WILSON, LEVANNA M 1.00 ELE PRIN $49,985.43 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.00 $49,985.43 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 COLLINS, PEGGY S 1.00 MUSIC $26,437.00 06 CRAWFORD, CARMELIA A 0.10 MATH SPEC $3,179.70 01 GENTRY-HEARD, RENEE' 1.00 SPE-M/RET $32,861 .00 01 MCBRIDE, BARBARA L 1.00 SPEECH $28,846.00 01 PADILLA, PAULA A 0.60 G\u0026amp;T $21 ,511.20 01 PLEDGER, OSHIE L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $36,876.00 01 RICKETTS, MELISSA K 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $22,724.00 01 SHENEP, CYNTHIA K 0.60 SPEECH $18,271.20 06 STILES, DONNA M 0.60 MATH-CHPI $21 ,005.40 06 YEAGER, JUDITH A 1.00 READING $35,270.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 7.90 $246,981.50 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. '-,l\\S-0 \\NVO\"R.MA.T\\ON S.RV\\C DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 6 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY SERV.WKRS. 02 BLEDSOE, STANLEY 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,199.00 02 FLOWERS, MARTIIA L 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,203.00 02 POSITION,VACANT 0.50 CUS-PmME CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $25,402.00 TCHR.AIDES 02 ClilLDS, FRANCES C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 EASTERLY, SHEILA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 lilLL, CAROLYN 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 HORNER, BOBBIE RAY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,136.00 02 HUDSON, MARY B 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 MILLER, VANESSA C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,051.20 02 OWENS, ROMUNDA L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,159.00 02 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE 0.60 LAB ATTEND $6,246.60 02 SESSION, MARCIA J 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,338.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.60 $71,575.20 YEARLY TOTALS: 37.60 $855, 140.38 95 BALE 308.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 HENDRICKS, LUCY M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 SITLINGTON, CAROL W 0.40 MEDIA CL $6,005.43 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $23,200.08 ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 01 BROWN, CLARA J 1.00 ELEM! $29,177.00 01 CONLEY, FRANCES J 1.00 ELEM II $25,935.00 01 DOCKERY, MAE K 1.00 ELEMV $32,358.00 01 FUNK, PA ULA R 1.00 ELEM VI $20,262.00 01 GADDY, ELLISTINE 1.00 ELEM lV $37,221.00 01 GEURIN, RAMONA 0 1.00 4YROLD $35,600.00 01 HUTTO, MARYE 1.00 KINDER-REG $35,074.00 01 JACKSON JR, JOSEPH 1.00 ELEM VI $38,315.00 01 JOHNSON, CARTIIORIA 1.00 4YROLD $35,337.00 01 JOHNSON, DELMA J 1.00 ELEM III $35,377.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 7 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 MORRIS, CHRISTY S 1.00 ELEM I 01 NELSON, JOANNE 1.00 ELEMV $37,221.00 01 ROGERS, CHARLENE I 1.00 KINDER-REG $39,126.00 01 TALLEY, HELEN J 1.00 ELEM II $33,473.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 14.00 $434,476.00 GUIDANCE 01 ROUSE, WARREN J 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $37,221.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,221.00 LIB/AV. 01 SCHOFIELD, SANDRA 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $35,863.98 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $35,863.98 OTHER PROF. 02 POSITION, VACANT 0.40 NURSE CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 PRlN 01 ANDERSON, BARBARA A 1.00 ELE PRJN $44,427.13 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $44,427.13 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 COLLINS, PEGGY S 1.00 MUSIC $27,496.00 06 CRAWFORD, CARMELIA A 0.10 MATH SPEC $3 ,290.50 01 GENTRY-HEARD, RENEE' 1.00 SPE-M/RET $33,979.00 01 MCBRIDE, BARBARA L 1.00 SPEECH $29,927.00 01 PADILLA, PAULA A 0.60 G\u0026amp;T $22,198.80 01 PLEDGER, OSIIlE L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $37,221.00 01 RICKETTS, MELISSA K 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $23,747.00 01 SHENEP, CYNTIIlA K 0.60 SPEECH $18,928.80 06 STILES, DONNA M 0.60 MATH-CHP I $21,202.20 06 YEAGER, JUDITII A 1.00 READING $36,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 7.90 $254,401.30 SERV.WKRS. 02 CHARLES JR, EARL 1.00 CUSTODAN $3,698.46 02 THOMAS, JOHNNY 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $14,529.74 02 WILLIAMS, GARY DEAN 0.50 CUS-PffiME $924.62 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $19,152.82 TCHR.AIDES Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all em1lloyees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 BRADFORD, OLLIE M 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 CHILDS, FRANCES C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 EASTERLY, SHEILA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 HILL, CAROLYN 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,911.00 02 HORNER, BOBBIE RAY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,387.70 02 I-illDSON, MARY B 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 MILLER, VANESSA C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,242.10 02 OWENS, ROMUNDA L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 AIDE-SVA 02 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE 0.60 LAB ATTEND $6,246.60 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.60 $78,842.40 YEARLY TOTALS: 38.80 $927,584.71 96 BALE 338.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 HENDRICKS, LUCY M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 SilUNGTON, CAROL W 0.40 MEDIA CL $6,005.43 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $23,200.08 ELEMCLSRM. TCH. 01 BALENKO, MARYE 1.00 ELEM! $36,411 .00 01 BROWN, CLARA J 1.00 ELEM! $29,988.00 OJ CONLEY, FRANCESJ 1.00 ELEM II $26,746.00 OJ CUNNINGHAM, LISA D 1.00 ELEM Ill $31,548.00 OJ DOCKERY, MAE K 1.00 ELEMV $33,169.00 01 FRANCIS, LYNDA S 1.00 ELEM IV $25,935.00 01 FUNK, PA ULA R 1.00 ELEM Ill $21 ,072.00 OJ GEURIN, RAMONA 0 1.00 4 YR OLD $36,411.00 01 HUlTO, MARYE 1.00 KINDER-REG $35,884.00 01 JACKSON JR, JOSEPH 1.00 ELEM VI $39,126.00 01 JOHNSON, CARTIIORIA 1.00 4 YR OLD $36,147.00 01 LITTELL, TERRI S 1.00 KINDER-REG $31,609.00 01 NELSON, JOANN E 1.00 ELEMV $38,031.00 01 TALLEY, HELEN J 1.00 ELEM II $34,283.00 01 TARKINGTON, RONALDSTEVE 1.00 ELEM IV $28,367.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 9 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 UNDERWOOD-MORAVEC, LEIGH A 1.00 ELEM VI $29,927.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 16.00 $514,654.00 GUIDANCE 01 ROUSE, WARREN J 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $38,031.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $38,031.00 LIB/AV. 01 SCHOFIELD, SANDRA 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $39,021.39 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $39,021.39 OTHER PROF. 02 FLEMING, JIMMIE M 0.40 NURSE $7,469.78 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $7,469.78 PRIN 01 ANDERSON, BARBARA A 1.00 ELE PRIN $48,307.81 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $48,307.81 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 COLLINS, PEGGY S 1.00 MUSIC $28,306.00 01 GENTRY-HEARD, RENEE' 1.00 SPE-M/RET $34,790.00 01 MCBRIDE, BARBARA L 1.00 SPEECH $30,737.00 01 PADILLA, PAULA A 0.60 G\u0026amp;T $22,685.40 01 PLEDGER, OSHIE L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $38,031.00 01 RICKETTS, MELISSA K 1.00 SPE-DEAF $24,558.00 01 SHENEP, CYNTHIA K 0.60 SPEECH $19,414.80 06 STILES, DONNA M 0.50 MA TI-1-CHP I $18,073.50 06 STILES, DONNA M 0.50 MATH-CIIP I $18,073.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 7.20 $234,669.20 SERV.WKRS. 02 PHILLIPS, RAYMOND E 1.00 CUST-IlEAD $9,245.69 02 POSITION, VACANT 0.50 CUS-PfTTME 02 POSITION,VACANT 1.00 CUSTODAN CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $9,245.60 TCHR.AIDES 02 BRADFORD, OLLIE M 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 02 CHILDS, FRANCES C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663 .00 02 EASTERLY, SIIEILA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663 .00 02 HILL, CAROLYN 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $11,163.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) JO YEAR SlTE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 HORNER, BOBBIE RAY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,583.50 02 HUDSON, MARY B 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 MJCKLES, BRUCE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,183.00 02 MJLLER, VANESSA C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,366.70 02 OWENS, ROMUNDA L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 02 RUTH, PAULA L 1.00 AIDE-SP ED $10,663.00 02 SCARBROUGH, VALARIE 0.60 LABATfEND $6,397.80 CATEGORY TOTALS: 10.60 $95,672.00 YEARLY TOTALS: 41.10 $1,010,270.86 94 BASELINE 322.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 JAMES, TERRIE J 0.40 l'v1EDIA CL $4,656.00 02 JONES, ANNETfE L 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,719.88 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $20,375.88 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BROOKS, LETITIA R 1.00 ELEM IV $25,695.00 01 BULLINGTON, STACEY L 1.00 ELEM I $23,286.00 01 BURCHFIELD, VICKI 1.00 4 YR OLD $31,255.00 01 CARTER, CHARLES R 1.00 ELEM IV $26,739.00 01 DEATON, BETTY K 1.00 ELEMV $30,512.00 01 GLASON, DIANNE M 1.00 ELEM III $25,695.00 01 HARDESTY, PATTY J 1.00 ELEMil $32,600.00 01 HARRIS, LORETTA M 1.00 ELEMV $36,655.00 01 1-flJFFMAN, CAROLYN A 1.00 ELEM III $24,892.00 01 JAMES, MARILYN K 1.00 KINDER-REG $31 ,255.00 01 LAMB, ANITA J 1.00 ELEM II $33,162.00 01 MJTCHELL, MARIA A 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,710.00 01 SELF, ELAINE M 1.00 4 YR OLD $29,649.00 01 SMJTH, DELWIN H 1.00 ELEM VI $22,483.00 01 TAPPAN, DONNA M 1.00 ELEM I $24,089.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 15.00 $427,677.00 GUIDANCE 01 AKERS, SHARRA D 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $32,861.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) II YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $32,861.00 LIB/AV. 01 NALLEY, MARGARET R 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $32,892.84 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $32,892.84 OTHER PROF. 02 MCKENZIE, MILLY 0.40 NURSE $12,180.80 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $12,180.80 OTHR CLSRM.TCH. 01 FOWLER, MILLICENT K 0.50 SPE-LD $18,036.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.50 $18,036.50 PRIN 01 CI-IEATIIAM, MARY J 1.00 ELE PRIN $58,650.38 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $58,650.38 SEC.CLSRM TCH. 06 BURCHETT, CARLETTA D 0.40 READING $10,896.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KA TIIRYN D 0.10 MATH SPEC $2,964.90 06 MCDONALD, MARY J 0.60 MA TH-Cl-IP I $23,257.80 01 NORMAN, ANN C 1.00 MUSIC $33,162.00 01 POTEET, LISA B 0.50 SPEECH $14,824.50 01 SMITI-1, EUNICE D 1.00 SPE-M/RET $39,867.00 06 SMITH, WILLIAM 0 1.00 READING 01 WHITTAKER, NONA M 0.50 G\u0026amp;T $20,335.00 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 5.10 $145,307.20 SERV.WKRS. 02 FOSTER, BARRON J 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,202.00 02 HARRIS, BEYERL Y 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,202.00 02 RENDEL, RAYL 1.00 CUST-1-IEAD $15,360.0? CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $37,764.00 TCHR.A.IDES 02 BRANCH, PAULA E 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,159.00 02 CALDWELL, JOSEPHINE B 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,306.40 06 CANNON, SHIRLEY L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,159.00 02 CASEY, DOROTIIY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,306.40 02 CONLEY, TINA A 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 HUSSEY, PAULINE K 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,306.40 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. l...RSO \\N\"FORMA..\"f\\ON S.RV\\C\\,, l)\\,,\\\u0026gt;\"f. Sa\\ar)' = Base Sa\\ar)' + Stipends(does not include benefits) 12 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 JACKSON, CONNIE M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,306.40 02 MOORE-FUDAIL, DONNA K 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,159.00 02 RUNYAN, JUDITH A 0.60 LABATfEND $6,246.60 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.60 $68,360.20 YEARLY TOTALS: 37.00 $854,105.80 95 BASELINE 300.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 AKBAR, FATIMAH K 0.40 MEDIA CL $4,017.38 02 DELONEY, GLORIA M 1.00 SEC PRIN $9,168.23 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.40 $13,185.61 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BOWMAN, ROSE H 1.00 ELEM VI $21,072.00 01 BROOKS, LETITIA R 1.00 ELEM IV $26,746.00 01 BURCHFIELD, VICKI 1.00 4YROLD $32,358.00 01 COLLINS, KELI JO 1.00 KINDER-REG $23,443.00 01 DEATON, BETTY K 1.00 ELEMV $31,609.00 01 GLASON, DIANNE M 1.00 ELEM III $26,746.00 01 HARDESTY, PATTY J 1.00 ELEM II $33,716.00 01 HARRIS, LORETTA M 1.00 ELEMV $37,809.00 01 HUFFMAN, CAROLYN A 1.00 ELEM Ill $23,908.83 01 JAMES, MARILYN K 1.00 KINDER-REG $32,358.00 01 LAMB, ANITA J 1.00 ELEM! $33,473.00 01 MITCHELL, MARIA A 1.00 KINDER-REG $30,798.00 01 SELF, ELAINE M 1.00 4YROLD 01 SMITH, DELWIN H 1.00 ELEM VI $23,504.00 01 WEA VER, SHERRY ELLEN 1.00 ELEM I $20,262.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 15.00 $397,802.83 GUIDANCE 01 AKERS, SHARRA D 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $33,979.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $33,979.00 LIB/AV. 01 KOEHLER, CA THERINE E. 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $24,116.08 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $24,116.08 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 13 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FIE JOB CODE SALARY OTHER PROF. 02 ANSLEY, MARTIIA A 0.20 NURSE $1,728.38 02 JACKSON, PAMELA 0.10 NURSE $2,489.20 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.30 $4,217.58 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 FOWLER, MILLICENT K 0.50 SPE-LD $18,610.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.50 $18,610.50 PRIN 01 DEAN, LONNIE S 1.00 ELE PRIN $62,294.15 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $62,294.15 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 06 BURCHETT, CARLETTA D 1.00 READING $28,306.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KA TIIRYN D 0.10 MATIISPEC $3,073.70 01 HUDSON, LINDA S 1.00 SPE-M/RET $33,169.00 01 KEARNEY, MAPLE J 0.50 G\u0026amp;T $17,283.50 06 MCDONALD, MARY J 0.60 MATII-CHP I $23,475.60 01 NORMAN, ANN C 1.00 MUSIC $34,526.00 01 POSITION,VACANT 0.50 SPEECH CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.70 $139,833.80 SERV.WKRS. 02 GUYTON, WAVERLY A 1.00 CUSTODAN $2,138.87 02 HARRIS, BEYERL Y 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,202.00 02 RENDEL, RAY L 1.00 CUST-HEAD $15,782.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $29,122.87 TCHR.AIDES 02 BRANCH, PAULA E 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 CALDWELL, JOSEPHINE B 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,366.79 06 CANNON, SHIRLEY L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 CASEY, DOROTIN A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,366.70 02 CONLEY, TINA A 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 HUSSEY, PAULINE K 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,366.70 02 JACKSON, CONNIE M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,366.70 02 MOORE-FUDAIL, DONNA K 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $9,229.21 02 PINKERTON, ANGELIA R 0.60 LAB ATTEND $272.30 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. \\...l\\.SD U-1.l'Ol\\.MA\"HON S'El\\.VlC'E D'EVl:. Sa\\ary = Base Sa\\ary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 14 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.60 $62,201.31 YEARLY TOTALS: 36.50 $785,363.73 96 BASELINE 313.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 AKBAR, FATIMAH K 0.40 MEDIA CL $4,731.50 02 DELONEY, GLORIA M 1.00 SEC PRIN $13,818.70 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $18,550.20 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BOWMAN, ROSE H 1.00 ELEM VI $21 ,883.00 01 BURCHETT, CARLETTA D 1.00 ELEM I $29,117.00 01 BURCHFIELD, VICKI 1.00 4 YR OLD $33,169.00 01 CLEVENGER, SARA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $24,314.00 01 COX,SUSANM 1.00 ELEM IV 01 DEA TON, BETTY K 1.00 ELEMV $32,419.00 01 GLASON, DIANNE M 1.00 ELEM III $27,556.00 01 HUFFMAN, CAROLYN A 1.00 ELEM III $26,746.00 01 JAMES, MARILYN K 1.00 KINDER-REG $33,169.00 01 LAMB, ANITA J 1.00 ELEM I $34,283.00 01 PEARSON, MARVA D 1.00 ELEM VI $34,790.00 01 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 ELEM II 01 SELF, ELAINE M 1.00 4 YR OLD $31 ,548.00 01 TATIJM, VALERIE L 1.00 ELEM IV $12,136.09 01 THOMAS, BRENDA SUE 1.00 KINDER-REG $20,262.00 01 WHITLOW, ALECIA A 1.00 ELEM II $20,515.31 CATEGORY TOTALS: 16.00 $381,907.40 GUIDANCE 01 AKERS, SHARRA D 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $34,790.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $34,790.00 LIB/AV. 01 KOEHLER, CA THERINE E. 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $27,110.07 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $27,110.07 OTHER PROF. 02 WALKER, TERRI LYNN 0.20 NURSE $4,538.60 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 15 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 CRISWELL, DONICA M CATEGORY TOTALS: PRIN 01 COX, ELEANOR V CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 COLE, BETTY J 01 GOACHER, TINA D. OJ KEARNEY, MAPLE J 06 MCDONALD, MARY J 06 MCDONALD, MARY J 01 NORMAN, ANN C CATEGORY TOTALS: SERV.WKRS. 02 HARRIS, BEYERL Y 02 POSITION, VACANT 02 RENDEL, RAY L CATEGORY TOTALS: TCHR.AIDES 02 BAKER, ROBIN 02 BRANCH, PAULA E 06 CANNON, SHIRLEY L 02 CASEY, DOROTHY A 02 CONLEY, TINA A 02 COOPER, JUANITA 02 HUSSEY, PAULINE K 02 MOORE-FUDAIL, DONNA K 02 PINKERTON, ANGELIA R 02 REAMS, BERNARD 02 WOODLEY, CLIFTON D CATEGORY TOTALS: YEARLY TOTALS: Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FIE 0.20 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.60 3.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 10.60 38.30 JOB CODE SPE-LD ELE PRIN SPEECH SPE-M/RET G\u0026amp;T MATII-CHP I MA TI-1-CHP I MUSIC CUSTODAN CUSTODAN CUST-IIEAD AIDE-REGLR AIDE-4YR AIDE-REGLR AIDE-SVA AIDE-4YR AIDE-REGLR AlDE-SVA AIDE-REGLR LABAlTEND AIDE-REGLR AIDE-SVA SALARY $4,538.60 $12,157.00 $12,157.00 $56,824.29 $56,824.29 $17, 141.50 $22,693.00 $17,688.50 $19,968.00 $19,968.00 $21 ,202.20 S 118,661.20 $11,541.00 $16,224.00 $27,765.00 $9,341.76 $10,663.00 $5,491.30 $10,663.00 $9,172.94 $5,491.30 $10,663 .00 $5,289.60 $8,816.00 $5,704.01 $81,295.91 $763,599.67 This re\\}ort does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 94 BOOKER 602.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 LACEY JR, JESSE I 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $52,028.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $52,028.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 DA VIS, VELLA D 1.00 MEDIA CL $14,903.50 12 JOYNER, TISA S 1.00 SEC PRIN $14,246.21 12 POWELL, MARYE M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $46,344.36 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 12 ABBOTT, JO ANN 1.00 ELEM Ill $29,950.00 12 ARMSTRONG, MARTIIA A 1.00 ELEM PE $38,763.00 12 AUSTIN, CLARA D 1.00 ELEM IV $40,670.00 12 BAKER, MICHELE LYNN 1.00 ELEM IV 12 BONDS, WILMA B 1.00 KINDER-REG $30,191.00 12 BURRUSS, MERILYN P 1.00 ELEM III $31 ,556.00 12 CLARK, DENISE W 1.00 ELEMV $24,892.00 12 COLFORD, SUSAN 1.00 ELEM VI $34,206.00 12 DORER, ROBERT A 1.00 ELEM PE $33,162.00 12 ELLINGTON, LORETTA 1.00 ELEM Ill $28,104.00 12 FARLEY, JENNIFER D 1.00 ELEM I $22,073.19 12 GIPSON, DEBRA ELISE 1.00 ELEM II 12 HARDING, CASSANDRA D 1.00 ELEM IV $25,635.00 12 HARRIS, PAULA R 1.00 ELEM VI $22,483.00 12 HESTIR, JOANN 1.00 ELEM! $36,073.00 12 HIGDON, TAMMY 1.00 ELEM II $30,452.00 12 JEFFRIES, VEARLON L 1.00 KINDER-REG $37,458.00 12 JOHNSON, MAYREAN S 1.00 ELEMV $40,670.00 12 JONES, ALICIA R 1.00 ELEM! $28,846.00 12 KELLEY, CLEMENTINE 1.00 ELEMV $40,670.00 12 KELLEY, LOIS W 1.00 ELEMil 12 KELLY, EVELYN 1.00 ELEM II 12 LEHNHOFF, DENNA N 1.00 ELEMV $36,876.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on llayroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 17 II' YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 LOTTON, MARY R 1.00 ELEM MUS $40,670.00 12 NEWCOMB, DARYL D 1.00 ELEMVI $29,930.00 12 SARLO, THOMAS C 1.00 ELEM ART $34,467.00 12 TAYLOR, CAROLYN W 1.00 ELEM IV $32,359.00 12 WALKER, BERTIIENA C 1.00 ELEM I $34,246.00 12 WALLS, BOBBIE J 1.00 KINDER-REG $28,846.00 12 WEIR, NANCY L 1.00 ELEMVI $35,009.00 12 WHITE, DISHOUNGII 1.00 ELEM III $25,695.00 12 YOUNG, MICHELLE L 1.00 KINDER-REG $23,527.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 32.00 $897,479.19 GUIDANCE 12 BISHOP, NANCY L 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $31 ,536.00 12 DOOLEY, VIVIAN K 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $32,058.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $63,594.00 LIB/AV. 12 BURNS, PATRICIA M 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $37,012.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,012.40 OTHER PROF. 12 ALLEY, MARYL 1.00 SPEC INS $40,670.00 12 SCOTT-JOHNSON, UVITA L 1.00 NURSE $27,301.00 12 SMITH, MARY A 1.00 SPEC INS $37,458.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $105,429.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 12 PLEASANT, CARWIN J 1.00 ORCHESTR CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.00 PRIN 12 SIMMONS, CHERYL A 1.00 ELE PRIN $54,600.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $54,600.00 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 12 BLEDSOE, RITA L 1.00 MUSIC $40,670.00 12 BROWN, MARTHA C 1.00 MA Tll-COMPT $16,380.60 12 DICKERSON, KAYE H 1.00 READING $31 ,255.00 12 HUIE, CAROLYN K 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $36,073.00 12 KARP, ROSE MARIE 1.00 READING $32,861.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropo\\itan Schoo\\, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. L.. ,- ' ~'Q.~~ ,N\"l--o'Q.\"N'\\\"\"'-~'oN -s:v.R.v,c-v nv.~ ~a\\ay,~ - Bn,\"4.e ~ .. ,,\\.u-...., + ~,,,,~n,\\\"4.(,lne\"4. not. \\nc\\ud~ 1-\u0026lt;ten'-f\"U ..... ') YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 KINDER, JAMES B l.00 ART $24,892.00 12 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K 0.33 SPE-N/CATG $12,361.14 12 MCMORRAN, MARYE 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $38,763.00 12 MEYERDIRK, CAROL A 1.00 IN CP SP $38,763.00 12 WI-IlTE, GLORIA A 1.00 MATII-COMPT $40,670.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.33 $312,688.74 SERV.WKRS. 12 BROWN, LAWRENCE 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 12 HAYES, OMAH 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 12 MARSHALL, JAMES A 1.00 CUST-HEAD $16,895.80 12 TROTTER, DANIEL L 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $51,243.80 TCHR.AIDES 12 CHARLESTON, SANTONIA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,428.96 12 CURRY, VIRGINIA E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,428.96 12 HARRELL, ALICE L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,428.96 12 MIDDLETON, PATSY A 1.00 LAB ATTEND $10,411.00 12 OLIVER, ORA D 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,428.96 12 WOODS, BRENDA L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,256.48 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $47,383.32 YEARLY TOTALS: 63.33 S 1,667,802.81 95 BOOKER 554.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 LACEY JR, JESSE J 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $52,333.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $52,333.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 DA VIS, VELLA D 1.00 MEDIA CL $15,145.18 12 JOYNER, TISA S 1.00 SEC PRIN $14,737.80 12 POWELL, MARYE M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 CATEGORY TOT AL.S: 3.00 $47,077.63 ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 12 ARMSTRONG, MARTHA A 1.00 ELEM PE $39,126.00 12 AUSTIN, CLARA D 1.00 ELEM IV $41 ,051.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 19 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 BAKER, MICHELE LYNN 1.00 ELEM IV $21,072.00 12 BONDS, WILMA B 1.00 KINDER-REG $31,285.00 12 BURRUSS, MERILYN P 1.00 ELEM III $32,662.00 12 COLFORD, SUSAN 1.00 ELEM VI $35,337.00 12 DORER, ROBERT A 1.00 ELEM PE $33,473.00 12 ELLINGTON, LORETTA 1.00 ELEM III $29,177.00 12 FAIR, DIXIE W 1.00 ELEM II $32,358.00 12 FARLEY, JENNIFER D 1.00 ELEM I $24,314.00 12 HARDING, CASSANDRA D 1.00 ELEM IV $26,685.00 12 HARRIS, PAULA R 1.00 ELEM VI $23,504.00 12 HESTIR, JOANN 1.00 ELEM I $37,221.00 12 IDGDON, TAMMY 1.00 ELEM II $31,548.00 12 JEFFRIES, VEARLON L 1.00 KINDER-REG $38,619.00 12 JOHNSON, MA YREAN S 1.00 ELEMV $41,051.00 12 JONES, ALICIA R 1.00 ELEM! $29,927.00 12 KELLEY, CLEMENTINE 1.00 ELEMV $41,051.00 12 KELLY,EVELYN 1.00 ELEM II $21,072.00 12 LEHNHOFF, DENNA N 1.00 ELEMV $37,221.00 12 LOFTON, MARY R 1.00 ELEM MUS $41 ,051.00 12 NEWCOMB, DARYL D 1.00 ELEMVI $31,021.00 12 POSITION,VACANT 1.00 ELEMV 12 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 ELEM II 12 SARLO, TIIOMAS C 1.00 ELEM ART $35,600.00 12 TAGGART, MICO RENEE 1.00 ELEM III 12 TAYLOR, CAROLYN W 1.00 ELEM IV $33,473.00 12 WALKER, BERTHENA C 1.00 ELEM I $35,377.0Q 12 WALLS, BOBBIE J 1.00 KINDER-REG $31,021.00 12 WEIR, NANCY L 1.00 ELEM VI $35,337.00 12 WIDTE, DISI IOUNGH 1.00 ELEM III $26,746.00 12 YOUNG, MICHELLE L 1.00 KINDER-REG $25,611 .00 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 32.00 $942,991.00 GUIDANCE 12 DOOLEY, VIVIAN K 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $34,263.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternathe Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 20 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 WOODHAM, MICHELE E 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $33,169.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $67,432.00 LIB/AV. 12 BURNS, PATRICIA M 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $38,190.30 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $38,190.30 OTHER PROF. 12 ALLEY, MARYL 1.00 SPEC INS $41,051.00 12 MOOREHEAD, KENNITI-1 D 1.00 SPEC INS $32,419.00 12 SCOTT-JOHNSON, UVITA L 1.00 NURSE $28,104.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $101,574.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 12 TENISON, MARY JOB 1.00 ORCHESTR CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 PRIN 12 SIMMONS, CHERYL A 1.00 ELE PRIN $56,095.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $56,095.00 SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 12 BLEDSOE, RITA L 1.00 MUSIC $41 ,051.00 12 BROWN, MARTHA C 0.60 MA 11-l-COMPT $10,212.12 12 DICKERSON, KAYE H 1.00 READING $32,358.00 12 HUIE, CAROLYN K 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $37,221.00 12 KARP, ROSE MARIE 1.00 READING $33,979.00 12 KINDER, JAMES B 1.00 ART $26,989.00 12 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K 0.33 SPE-N/CATG $12,744.27 12 MCMORRAN, MARYE 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $39, 126.00 12 MEYERDlRK, CAROL A 1.00 IN CP SP $39,126.00 12 WlllTE, GLORIA A 1.00 MA Tl 1-COMPT $41,051.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.93 $313,857.39 SERV.WKRS. 12 BROWN, GEORGE 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,229.00 12 BROWN, LAWRENCE 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 12 HAYES,OMAH 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,245 .00 12 MARSHALL, JAMES A 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $17,375.80 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $51,383.80 TCHR.AIDES Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 21 J YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 CHARLESTON, SANTON1A \\ _()() AlUE-S'\\JA $1,'.i1'.~-'.W, I 12 CURRY, VIRGrNIA E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,513.38 12 MIDDLETON, PATSY A 1.00 LAB ATTEND $10,911.00 12 OLIVER, ORA D 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,513 .38 12 POSITION,VACANT 1.00 AIDE-SVA 12 WOODS, BRENDA L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,513.38 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $40,964.52 YEARLY TOTALS: 62.93 $1,711,898.64 96 BOOKER 618.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 HALL, DONNA R 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $37,230.52 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,230.52 CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 DA VIS, VELLA D 1.00 MEDIA CL $15,145.18 12 JOYNER, TISA S 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,229.39 12 POWELL, MARYE M 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $47,569.22 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 12 ARMSTRONG, MARTI IA A 1.00 AUXTEACIIR $39,936.00 12 AUSTIN, CLARA D 1.00 ELEM rv $41 ,86 1.00 12 BAKER, MICHELE LYNN 1.00 ELEM IV $22,937.00 I 12 BROWN, MARTI IA C 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,177.00 12 COLFORD, SUSAN 1.00 ELEM VI $36,147.00 12 DORER, ROBERT A 1.00 ELEM PE $34 ,283.00 12 ELLINGTON,LORETTA 1.00 ELEMIH $29,988.00 12 FAIR, DIXIE W 1.00 ELEM II $33,169.00 12 FARLEY, JENNIFER D 1.00 ELEM I $25,125.00  12 1-IALLUM, AMY LEIGI I 1.00 ELEM III $20,262.00 12 HARDING, CASSANDRA D 1.00 ELEM IV $25,165.16 12 IIARRrS, PAULA R 1.00 ELEM VI $25,368.00 12 HESTIR, JOANN 1.00 ELEM! $38,031.00 12 HIGDON, TAMMY 1.00 ELEM II $32,358.00 12 HIPPS, DEBORAH S. 1.00 ELEMV $23 ,443.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all em1lloyees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVlCE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Sti1lends(does not include benefits) 22 ~ = _.._.. ~-- --- YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 12 JEFFRIES, VEARLON L 1.00 KINDER-REG $39,430.00 12 JOHNSON, MAYREAN S 1.00 ELEMV $41 ,861.00 12 JONES, ALICIA R 1.00 ELEM I $30,737.00 12 KELLEY, CLEMENTINE 1.00 ELEMV $41 ,861.00 12 KELLY, EVELYN 1.00 ELEM II $21 ,883.00 12 LEHNHOFF, DENNA N 1.00 ELEMV $38,031.00 12 NEWCOMB, DARYL D 1.00 ELEM VI $31,832.00 12 SARLO, THOMAS C 1.00 ELEM ART $36,411.00 12 TAGGART, MICO RENEE 1.00 ELEM II $21 ,072.00 12 TAYLOR, CAROLYN W 1.00 ELEM IV $34,283.00 12 TUCKER, TRACYSELBY 1.00 ELEM III $25,064.00 12 WALKER, BERTHENA C 1.00 ELEM I $36,188.00 12 WALLS, BOBBIE J 1.00 KINDER-REG $31 ,832.00 12 WEIR, NANCY L 1.00 ELEM VI $36,147.00 12 WlllTE, DISHOUNGH 1.00 ELEM III $27,556.00 12 YOUNG, MICHELLE L 1.00 KINDER-REG $27,496.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 31.00 $978,934.16 GUIDANCE 12 DOOLEY, VIVIAN K 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $36,188.00 12 WOODHAM, MICHELE E 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $33,979.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $70,167.00 LIB/AV. 12 BURNS, PATRICIA M 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $39,021 .39 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $39,021.39 OTHER PROF. 12 ALLEY, MARYL 1.00 SPEC CNS $41 ,861 .00 12 MOOREHEAD, KENNITH D 1.00 SPEC CNS $33 ,229.00 12 SCOTT-JOHNSON, UVITA L 1.00 NURSE $29,177.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $104,267.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 12 BLEDSOE, RITA L 0.50 ORCHESTR $20,930.50 12 CRIPPS, JOSEPH D 1.00 ORCHESTR $29,177.00 12 MEYERDIRK, CAROL A 1.00 lN CP SPEC $39,936.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $90,043.50 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 23 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FIE JOB CODE SALARY PRIN 12 SIMMONS, CHERYL A 1.00 ELEPRIN $57,267.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $57,267.00 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 12 ARMSlRONG, ERMA L 1.00 READING $37,221.00 12 BLEDSOE, RITA L 0.50 MUSIC $20,930.50 12 BURRUSS, MERILYN P 0.60 MATH-COMPT $12,259.08 12 HUIE, CAROLYN K 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $38,031 .00 12 KARP, ROSE MARIE 1.00 READING $34,790.00 12 KINDER, JAMES B 1.00 ART $27,799.00 12 LOFTON, MARY R 1.00 MUSIC $41 ,861 .00 12 MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K 0.33 SPEECH $13,011.90 12 MCMORRAN, MARYE 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $39,936.00 12 WHITE, GLORIA A 1.00 MATH-COMPT $41,861 .00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.43 $307,700.48 SERV.WKRS. 12 BROWN, LA WREN CE 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,956.00 12 HAYES,OMAH 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,554.00 12 MARSHALL, JAMES A 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,855.80 12 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 CUSTODAN CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $43,365.80 TCHRAIDES 12 CHARLESTON, SANTONIA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,687.82 12 CURRY, VIRGINIA E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,687.82 12 MAYWEATHER, LOUISE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,990.06 12 MIDDLETON, PATSY A 1.00 LABATI\"END $11 ,163.00 12 OLIVER, ORA D 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,687.81. 12 WOODS, BRENDA L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,687.82 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $48,904.34 YEARLY TOTALS: 62.93 $1,824,470.41 94 BRADY 387.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 SITLINGTON, CAROL W 0.40 MEDIA CL $5,909.60 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 24 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 WHERRY, JACQUELINE L 1.00 SEC PRIN $16,845.06 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $22,754.66 ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 01 CROMEDY, GERALDINE 1.00 ELEM II $33,162.00 01 DUGAN, FRANCES R 1.00 KINDER-REG $36,876.00 01 ELAM, MARSHAL 1.00 ELEM III $26,739.00 01 HANNAHS, BARBARA I 1.00 ELEM VJ $35,049.00 01 HARKEY, JANE A 1.00 ELEM IV $30,733.00 01 lllMSTEDT, KIMBERLY H 1.00 ELEM III $26,498.00 01 KOON, BETTY R 1.00 ELEM II $31 ,797.00 01 LESTER, SANDRA L 1.00 ELEMV $25,936.00 01 MCCLURKAN, EDWINA Y 1.00 4YROLD $40,670.00 01 OLIVER, SHELLY R 1.00 ELEM III $32,600.00 01 ROSE, SHERRY L 1.00 ELEM I $35,852.00 01 SUMNER, FRANK.IE B 1.00 ELEM II $35,009.00 01 TEETER, KATHRYN A 1.00 KINDER-REG $25,635.00 01 TOLBERT, IRMA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $27,301.00 01 VARDAMAN, TAMIL 1.00 ELEM VJ $24,892.00 01 WAMBLE, FAUSTINE 1.00 ELEMV $28,846.00 01 WASHINGTON, MARY A 1.00 ELEM I $36,876.00 01 WELLS-SAFFOLD, MISlYE ELIZABETII 1.00 ELEM I $20,074.00 01 YOUNG, EVA M 1.00 ELEM IV CATEGORY TOTALS: 19.00 $554,545.00 GUIDANCE 01 GAMBLE, SUSANNE 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $33,140.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $33,140.00 LIB/AV. 01 NUNLEY, GLORIA A 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $30,709.43 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $30,709.43 PRIN 01 MENKING, MARY A 1.00 ELE PRIN $55,402.67 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 SSS,402.67 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 BRADLEY, ROZALYN M 0.50 SPEECH $18,438.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 25 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 06 CHARLES, KA TI-ILEEN M 0.60 READING $20,848.80 01 CROSBY, SUSAN M 1.00 MUSIC $27,240.00 01 GORDON, JANICE L 0.50 SPE-N/CATG $18,438.00 01 HODGES, BARBARA L 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $35 ,551.00 06 KOVACH, LILLIAN R 0.40 MATH SPEC $12,502.00 06 MCGEE, SUZANNE B 0.60 MATH-CHPI $22,125.60 01 MCINTYRE, GORDON L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $32,339.00 06 SHELLS, GENEVA S 1.00 READING $40,670.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.60 $228, I 52.40 SERV.WKRS. 02 ATKINSON, ARISTAL 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,078.00 02 FOSTER, DONALD 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $14,495.60 02 WILLIAMS, WILLIE F 0.50 CUS-PffiME $2,476.75 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $28,050.35 TCHR.AIDES 02 HARDY, KATHRYN C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $9,210.83 02 JONES JR, EARNEST L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,549.60 02 MOORE, PATSY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,701.52 02 NICHOLS, VALARIE R 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,837.04 02 O'NEAL, EARNEST L 0.80 LAB ATTEND $7,724.00 02 TAYLOR, WON D 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 WIGHT, LINDA M 1.00 AID-TITL 6 $10,411.00 02 WILLIAMS, SARAH M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5 ,837.04 02 WOFFORD, HELEN L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.80 $70,093.03 YEARLY TOTALS: 41.30 $1,022,847.54 95 BRADY 389.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R 0.60 MEDIA CL $8,582.44 02 WHERRY, JACQUELINE L 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,336.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.60 $25,919.09 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 AV ANT, MELISSA ANNE 1.00 ELEM TV $20,262.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LR.SD lNVORMA.TlON Sll.RVlCE DEPT. Sa\\arv = Base Sa\\ar-v + Stipends(does not include benefits) 2,\n-~.._,_ .... ~~ .. _.. _ . ............. -- . ~-----. - - -- - -- YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 CHARLES, KA TI-Il.,EEN M 1.00 KINDER-REG $35,884.00 01 CROMEDY, GERALDINE 1.00 ELEM II $33,473.00 01 DUGAN, FRANCES R 1.00 KINDER-REG $37,221.00 01 ELAM, MARSHA L 1.00 ELEM Ill $27,799.00 01 HANNAHS, BARBARA I 1.00 ELEM VI $36,188.00 01 I-llGHT, REBECCA R 1.00 ELEMV $27,556.00 01 JOHNSON, JENNIFER L 1.00 ELEMV $29,117.00 01 JONES, PAMELA K 1.00 KINDER-REG $37,221.00 01 KOON, BETTY R 1.00 ELEM II $32,905.00 01 MCCLURKAN, EDWINA Y 1.00 4 YR OLD $41,051.00 01 MILLER, ERMA D 1.00 ELEM! 01 OLIVER, SHELLY R 1.00 ELEM III $33,716.00 01 ROSE, SHERRY L 1.00 ELEM! $36,998.00 01 TIIOMAS, RICHELLE L 1.00 ELEM II $21,072.00 01 TOLBERT, IRMA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $28,367.00 01 VARDAMAN, TAMIL 1.00 ELEM VI $26,989.00 01 WASHINGTON, MARY A 1.00 ELEM I $37,221.00 01 YOUNG,EVAM 1.00 ELEM IV $17,779.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 19.00 $560,819.50 GUIDANCE 01 GAMBLE, SUSANNE 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $34,257.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $34,257.00 LIB/AV.- 01 NUNLEY, GLORIA A 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $31,828.84 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $31,828.84 PRIN 01 RAPER, BETTY G 1.00 ELE PRIN $42,555.17 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $42,555.17 SEC.CLSRM TCH. 01 CROSBY, SUSAN M 1.00 MUSIC $28,306.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KATHRYN D 0.10 MATIISPEC $3,073.70 01 GORDON, JANICE L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $37,221.00 01 HODGES, BARBARA L 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $36,694.00 06 MCGEE, SUZANNE B 0.60 MATII-CIIP I Note: Em1\u0026gt;loyees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 27 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 MCINlYRE, GORDON L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $33,453.00 01 PEEK, PEGGY R 0.50 SPEECH $16,179.00 06 POSITION, VACANT 0.40 READING 06 SHELLS, GENEVA S 1.00 READING $41,051.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.60 $195,977.70 SERV.WKRS. 02 ATKINSON, ARISTAL 1.00 CUSTODAN $11 ,539.00 02 HOWARD JR, WILL H 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $13,660.09 02 WILLIAMS, TRACEY N 0.50 CUS-PffiME CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $25,199.09 TCHRAIDES 02 BRANCH, ERIC 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,826.47 06 HARDY, KATHRYN C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,159.00 02 MOORE, PATSY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,903.37 02 NICHOLS, VALARIE R 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,903.37 02 O'NEAL, EARNEST L 0.80 LAB ATTEND $7,925.60 02 PALMER, TARLISA 0.50 AIDE-REGLR $5,205.50 02 TAYLOR, WONE D 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 WILLIAMS, SARAH M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,903 .37 02 WOFFORD, HELEN L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.30 $66,648.68 YEARLY TOTALS: 41.00 $983,205.07 96 BRADY 388.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 NELSON, WILBURLENE R 0.60 MEDIA CL $8,734.99 02 WHERRY, JACQUELINE L 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,336.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.60 $26,071.64 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 CROMEDY, GERALDINE 1.00 ELEM II $34,283.00 01 DUGAN, FRANCES R 1.00 KINDER-REG $38,315.00 01 EVANS, REBECHA M 1.00 ELEM I $26,746.00 01 GALYEAN, NANETTE R 1.00 ELEM III $18,467.97 01 HANNAHS, BARBARA I 1.00 ELEM VI $36,998.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. \\ ,llSl'\\ \\Nl'OllMA'HON SV:llV\\C'll. Dll,\\\u0026gt;'T ~~,~ .. v = l\\~q,e Sa\\arv + Sth,en,l\u0026lt;il.(tloe~ not include benefit\"') , .. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 01 IDGHT, REBECCA R 1.00 ELEMV $28,367.00 01 JOHNSON, DELMA J 1.00 ELEM III $36,188.00 01 JONES, PAMELA K 1.00 KINDER-REG $38,031.00 01 KOON, BETTY R 1.00 ELEM II $33,716.00 01 MCCLURKAN, EDWINA Y 1.00 4YROLD $41 ,861.00 01 OLIVER, SHELLY R 1.00 ELEM III $34,526.00 01 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 ELEM IV 01 ROSE, SHERRY L 1.00 ELEM I $37,809.00 01 STEVENS, SHANNA M 1.00 ELEMV $21,316.00 01 11-IOMAS, RICHELLE L 1.00 ELEMII $21 ,883.00 01 TOLBERT, IRMA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,177.00 01 VARDAMAN, TAMIL 1.00 ELEM VI $28,853.00 01 WASHINGTON, MARY A 1.00 ELEM I $38,031.00 01 YOUNG, EVAM 1.00 ELEM IV $21 ,883 .00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 19.00 $566,450.97 GUIDANCE 01 GAMBLE, SUSANNE 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $35,067.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $35,067.00 LIB/AV. 01 NUNLEY, GLORIA A 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $32,660.96 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $32,660.96 PRIN 01 KEOWN, ADAL 1.00 ELEPRIN $45,268.37 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $45,268.37 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 CROSBY, SUSAN M 1.00 MUSIC $29,117.00 01 GORDON, JANICE L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $38,03] .0() 01 HODGES, BARBARA L 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $37,505.00 01 MCINTYRE, GORDON L 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $34,263.00 01 PEEK, PEGGY R 0.50 SPEECH $16,584.50 06 SHELLS, GENEVA S 0.50 READING $20,930.50 06 SHELLS, GENEVA S 0.50 READING $20,930.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 5.50 $197,361.50 SERV.WKRS. Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 29 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 ABERNATIN, RAYMOND 1.00 CUST-HEAD $8,803.48 02 ATKINSON, ARISTAL 1.00 CUSTODAN $ I 1,981.00 02 COTTON, PARIS JOSEPH 0.50 CUS-PffiME $2,005.19 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.50 $22,789.67 TCHR.AIDES 02 BRANCH, ERIC 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,041.85 06 HARDY, KATIIRYN C 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 MOORE, PATSY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,040.43 02 NICHOLS, VALARIE R 0.80 LAB ATTEND $4,006.83 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 AIDE-SVA 02 TAYLOR, WONE D 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 WILLIAMS, SARAH M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,040.43 02 WOFFORD, HELEN L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 7.80 $52,866.54 YEARLY TOTALS: 39.40 $978,536.65 94 CARVER 602.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 BARKSDALE, MARY D 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $42,421.93 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $42,421.93 CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 FRANKLIN, PHYLLIS P 1.00 SEC PRIN $14,737.80 12 MORRIS, NELDA J 1.00 MEDIA CL $14,326.00 12 SIMPSON, BElTI R 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $46,258.45 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 12 BENNETT,A 1.00 ELEMVl $33,443.00 12 BUCK, VIRGINIA S 1.00 ELEM IV $28,344.00 12 BURNEY, MARY C 1.00 ELEM! $26,437.00 12 BYRD, DEBORAH H 1.00 ELEM VJ $25,635.00 12 CURTIS, JULIE B 1.00 ELEM II $29,147.00 12 DOYNE, ANGELA K 1.00 KINDER-REG $34,748.00 12 FLEMING, LINDA K 1.00 ELEM VJ $31 ,255.00 12 GLENN, BETTY 1.00 ELEMV $38,763.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. u~su \\NFORMA'l'\\ON Sl!.RVlCI!. Dl!.l\"'l'. Sa\\an, = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 30 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 12 GLENN, LINDA F 1.00 ELEM I $29,649.00 12 HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J 1.00 ELEM II $36,876.00 12 HARRIS, RHONDA F 1.00 ELEM IV $22,483.00 12 HARRISON, KATHLEEN A 1.00 KINDER-REG $26,498.00 12 HOOKER, MELBA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,388.00 12 JESTER, JULIE D 1.00 ELEM IV $23,286.00 12 JOSEPH, JUNE D 1.00 ELEM II $20,877.00 12 KELLEY, BRYANA D 1.00 ELEM Ill $25,695.00 12 LANGLEY, DIANNE W 1.00 ELEM III $29,950.00 12 MACK,LISAK 1.00 ELEM II $30,994.00 12 MANNING, DEBRA A 1.00 ELEM ART 12 MUNNS, PATRICIA A 1.00 ELEM VI $25,695.00 12 PACE, TEATA D 1.00 ELEMV $25,133.00 12 PENN, PRISCILLA J 1.00 ELEMIII $22,483.00 12 ROBERTS, M MARTHA 1.00 KINDER-REG $26,498.00 12 SKUBAL, EUNICE L 1.00 ELEM I $22,483.00 12 WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V 1.00 ELEM IV $22,483.00 12 WA ITS, RONDA M 1.00 ELEMV $22,483 .00 12 WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K 1.00 ELEMV $27,782.00 12 WILSON, CYNTHIA L 1.00 ELEMIII $24,892.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 28.00 $743,400.00 GUIDANCE 12 AMMEL, LINDA G 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $29,930.00 12 TA TIJM, KA THY R 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $31,255.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $61,185.00 LIB/AV. 12 BELOTTI, VIRGINIA M 0.50 LIBRN-ELEM $16,188.89 12 THOMPSON, CAROLE 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $31,018.27 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.50 $47,207.16 OTHER PROF. 12 CRUM, JANES 1.00 INT/SPEC $34,748.00 12 CURTIS, MARY J 1.00 NURSE $31,556.00 12 MANNON, ROBERTA A 1.00 SPEC INS $28,846.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $95,150.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 31 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY OTHR Cl.BRM. TCH. 12 GREENLEE, KAREN ESTELLE 1.00 CUR SPEC $33,443.00 12 POSITION, VACANT 0.40 SPE MATII 12 SCOTT, Y ANA II 1.00 CUR SPEC $36,354.00 12 TIIOMAS, VANNETIA J 1.00 SPE MATII $25,936.00 12 UNDERWOOD-MORAVEC, LEIGH A 1.00 S/SPEC $28,043.00 CATEGORY TOT AI.B: 4.40 $123,776.00 PRIN 12 GUINN, MARYE 1.00 ELE PRIN CATEGORY TOTAI.B: 1.00 SEC. CI.BRM. TCH. 12 ANDREWS, SHARON F 0.40 G\u0026amp;T $8,149.92 12 ROBERTSON, LEETA D 1.00 MUSIC $20,074.00 12 SPANN, MEREDITII J 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $34,246.00 12 SWEAT, JESCENA 1.00 PE SPEC $30,452.00 12 VALUE, TERRIL 0.50 SPEECH $15,627.50 12 WALKER, SHIRLEY D 0.50 SPE-N/CATG $17,374.00 CATEGORY TOT AI.B: 4.40 $125,923.42 SERV.WKRS. 12 HASAN, ABDULLAH H 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,263.05 12 JONES, BETTY L 0.50 CUS-P/TIME $2,049.75 12 MACK, ROBERT 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,375.80 12 ROLAND, MIL TON 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,523.00 12 WOODS III, ROBERT L 0.50 CUS-PmME $2,476 .75 CATEGORY TOTAI.B: 4.00 $39,688.35 TCHR.AIDES 12 BAKER, PATRICIA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 12 BOYD, DARRELL L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,206.08 12 EFIRD, WENDY L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR 12 GIBSON, SUSANY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,061.44 12 GRIMMITI, BONNIE S 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,159.00 12 HARSHAW, HERRIN F 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,367.68 12 JOHNSON, IRENE B 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,245.12 12 MAYWEATHER, ELNORA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,367.68 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Leaming Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. 'UC::.\" ,NVO~l't.1\\1'..\"T,oN ~v.uv,c-v. '\\\"\\V.t\u0026gt;'T ~'A\\!.uv = 'I\\!,,~'-\" ~a\\arv + S.ti.t1iend!-1.(does not include henefits) 32 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 POSITION, VACANT I.DO LABATfEND 12 SANDERS, PATRICIA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 12 WINFREY,VEARLEAN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,367.68 CATEGORY TOTALS: 11.00 $65,596.68 YEARLY TOTALS: 63.30 $1,390,606.99 95 CARVER 593.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 SCOTT, Y ANA H 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $39,815.88 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $39,815.88 CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 HILL, JERRI L 1.00 SEC PRIN $11,020.57 12 MORRIS, NELDA J 1.00 SEC PRIN $13,637.14 12 SCHILLING, PAULA B 1.00 MEDIA CL $7,775.71 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $32,433.42 ELEM. CLSRM. TCH. 12 BENNETI,A 1.00 ELEM VI $34,567.00 12 BUCK, VIRGINIA S 1.00 ELEM IV $29,420.00 12 BURNEY, MARY C 1.00 ELEM I $27,496.00 12 BYRD, DEBORAH H 1.00 ELEM VI $26,685.00 12 CURTIS, JULIE B 1.00 ELEMII $30,231.00 12 DOYNE, ANGELA K 1.00 KINDER-REG $35,884.00 12 FLEMING, LINDA K 1.00 ELEM VI $32,358.00 12 GLENN, BETTY I.DO ELEMV $39,126.00 12 GLENN, LINDA F 1.00 ELEM I $30,737.00 12 HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J I.DO ELEM II $37,221.00 12 HARRIS, RHONDA F 1.00 ELEM IV $23,504.00 12 HARRISON, KATHLEEN A 1.00 KINDER-REG $22,102.21 12 HOOKER, MELBA J 1.00 KINDER-REG $30,474.00 12 JESTER, JULIE D 1.00 ELEM IV $25,368.00 12 JOSEPH, JUNE D 1.00 ELEM II $22,937.00 12 LANGLEY, DIANNE W 1.00 ELEM III $31,041.00 12 MANNING, DEBRA A I.DO ELEM ART $28,367.00 12 MUNNS, PATRICIA A I.DO ELEM III $26,746.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 33 Ill YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FIE JOB CODE SALARY 12 PACE, TEATA D 1.00 ELEMV $27,232.00 12 PENN, PRISCILLA J 1.00 ELEM III $23 ,504.00 12 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 ELEMil 12 ROBERTS, M MARTI-IA 1.00 KINDER-REG $27,556.00 12 SKUBAL, EUNICE L 1.00 ELEM I $23,504.00 12 TI-IOMAS, VANNETIA J 1.00 ELEM VI $28,043.00 12 WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V 1.00 ELEM IV $23,504.00 12 WA TIS, RONDA M 1.00 ELEMV $23,504.00 12 WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K 1.00 ELEMV $28,853.00 12 WILSON, CYNTIIIA L 1.00 ELEM III $24,719.30 CATEGORY TOTALS: 28.00 $764,683.51 GUIDANCE 12 AMMEL, LINDA G 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $31,021.00 12 TATIJM, KATI-IY R 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $32,358.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $63,379.00 i LIB/AV. 12 BELOTTI, VIRGINIA M 0.50 LIBRN-ELEM $16,756.29 12 THOMPSON, CAROL E 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $32,140.76 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.50 $48,897.05 OTHER PROF. 12 CRUM,JANES 1.00 INT/SPEC $35,884.00 12 CURTIS, MARY J 1.00 NURSE 12 MACK, LISAK 1.00 SPEC INS $32,095.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $67,979.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 12 DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN I-I 1.00 SPEMATII $28,853.00\n12 RUNION, DIANNE C 1.00 CUR SPEC $37,809.0Q ! 12 SMITH, MARY A 1.00 CUR SPEC $38,6 I 9.00 12 STEWART, EDIE GARNER 0.60 SPE MATH $15,525.00 12 UNDERWOOD-MORAVEC, LEIGH A 1.00 S/SPEC $29,117.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.60 $149,923.00 PRIN 12 BARKSDALE, MARY D 1.00 ELE PRIN $49,533.95 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $49,533.95 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. ,~su ,NVOR.'M.-..\",ON S11.Rv,c11. 011.l'\"\\' . Sa\\arv = Base Sa\\ar-y + Stipcnds(docs not include benefits) 34 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 12 HARRIS,KARENR 1.00 MUSIC $29,459.39 12 SPANN, MEREDITH J 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $35,377.00 12 STEWART, EDIE GARNER 0.40 G\u0026amp;T $10,350.00 12 SWEAT, JESCENA 1.00 PE SPEC $31,548.00 12 TARPLEY, GLYNDA C 1.00 SPE-N/CATG 12 VALUE, TERRIL 0.50 SPEECH $16,179.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.90 $122,913.39 SERV.WKRS. 12 FOSTER, DONALD 1.00 CUST-HEAD $14,997.60 12 HASAN,ABDULLAIIH 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,078.00 12 JONES, BETTY L 0.50 CUS-PffiME $2,049.75 12 ROLAND,MILTON 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,891.00 12 WOODS ID, ROBERT L 0.50 CUS-PffiME $2,561.25 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $39,577.60 TCHR.AIDES 12 BAKER, PATRIClA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,911.00 12 BURCH, CLAIRE E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,440.04 12 EFIRD, WENDY L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 12 GIBSON, SUSANY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,290.52 12 GRIMMITT, BONNIE S 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 12 HARRIS, TYRONE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,019.60 12 JOHNSON, IRENE B 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,440.04 12 JOHNSON, JOE A 1.00 LAB ATTEND $21,008.00 12 MAYWEATHER, ELNORA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,440.04 12 SANDERS, PATRIClA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 12 WINFREY,VEARLEAN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,440.0l! CATEGORY TOTALS: 11.00 $100,222.28 YEARLY TOTALS: 64.00 $1,479,358.08 96 CARVER 631.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 12 SCOTT, YANA H 1.00  A/PRINELE $41,827.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $41,827.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 35 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY CLERC/SEC'Y. 12 CLARK, ALICE KAY 1.00 SEC PRIN $14,246.21 12 HILL, JERRI L 1.00 SEC PRIN $11,790.46 12 SCHILLfNG, PAULA B 1.00 MEDIA CL $10,008.71 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $36,045.38 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 12 BUCK, VIRGfNlA S 1.00 ELEM IV $30,231.00 12 BURNEY, MARYC 1.00 ELEM! $28,306.00 12 BYRD, DEBORAH H 1.00 ELEM VI $27,496.00 12 CRUM,JANES 1.00 ELEM-DEV $36,694.00 12 CURTIS, JULIE B 1.00 ELEM II $31,041.00 12 DOYNE, ANGELA K 1.00 KfNDER-REG $36,694.00 12 FLEMING, LINDA K 1.00 ELEM VI $34,263.00 12 GLENN, BETTY 1.00 ELEMV $39,936.00 12 GLENN, LINDA F 1.00 ELEM! $31,548.00 12 HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J 1.00 ELEM II $38,031.00 12 HARRIS, RHONDA F 1.00 ELEM IV $24,314.00 12 HARRISON, KATHLEEN A 1.00 KfNDER-REG $28,367.00 12 HOOKER, MELBA J 1.00 KfNDER-REG $31,285.00 12 JESTER, JULCE D 1.00 ELEM IV $26,179.00 12 JOSEPH, JUNE D 1.00 ELEM II $23,747.00 12 MACK,LISAK 1.00 ELEM-DEV $16,281.12 12 MCKENDRY, SARAH A 1.00 ELEM II $21,072.00 12 MORGAN, HOLLY ELIZABETII 1.00 ELEM VI $21,072.00 12 MUNNS, PATRICIA A 1.00 ELEMirl $27,556.00 12 PACE, TEATA D 1.00 ELEMV $29,117.00 12 PENN, PRISCILLA J 1.00 ELEM Ill $24,314.00 12 ROBERTS, M MARTHA 1.00 KfNDER-REG $28,367.00 12 SKUBAL, EUNICE L 1.00 ELEM! $24,314.00 12 STEW ART, EDIE GARNER 0.40 ELEM-DEV $10,674.00 12 STEWART, EDCE GARNER 0.60 ELEM-DEV $16,011.00 12 SUNDERMAN, ANGIE D 1.00 ELEM ART $23,443.00 12 THOMAS, VANNETIA J 1.00 ELEM VI $28,853.00 12 WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V 1.00 ELEM IV $22,593.38 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. '-.l\\.SO Uol.VOl\\.MA.\"l:'\\ON S~l\\.V\\C~ O~l\u0026gt;'l'. Ra\\arv = lla~e Sa\\arv + Stinend~(does not include henefits) :Jr. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 WATT'S, RONDA M 1.00 ELEMV $24,314.00 12 WIBTE, LETICIA MILLER 1.00 ELEM-DEV $31,825.00 12 WILLIAMS JR, ORVEN E 1.00 ELEM III $21,883.00 12 WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K 1.00 ELEMV $29,664.00 12 WILSON, CYNTIIlA L 1.00 ELEM III $26,746.00 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 32.00 $896,23 I. 50 GUIDANCE 12 AMMEL, LINDA G 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $31,832.00 12 TATIJM, KATIIY R 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $33,169.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $65,001.00 LIB/AV. 12 BELOIB, VIRGINIA M 0.50 LIBRN-ELEM $17,172.35 12 IBOMPSON, CAROLE 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $32,972.88 CATEGORY TOTALS: I.SO $50,145.23 OTHER PROF. 12 CURTIS, MARY J 1.00 NURSE $33,472.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $33,472.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 12 DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN II 1.00 MATI-l SPEC $29,664.00 12 RUNION, DIANNE C 1.00 LANG SPEC $38,619.00 12 SMIIB, MARY A 1.00 CUR SPEC $39,430.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $107,713.00 PRIN 12 BARKSDALE, MARY D 1.00 ELE PRIN $53,423.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $53,423.00 SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 12 MURRAY, flMMY A 1.00 MUSIC $25,529.77 12 SPANN, MEREDIIB J 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $36,188.00 12 SWEAT, JESCENA 1.00 PE SPEC $32,358.00 12 TARPLEY, GLYNDA C 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $29,927.00 12 VALUE, TERRIL 0.50 SPEECII $16,584.50 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 4.50 $140,587.27 SERV.WKRS. 12 FOSTER, DONALD 1.00 CUST-HEAD $15,477.60 12 JONES, BETTY L 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,291.40 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 37 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 12 POSITION, VACANT 0.50 CUS-PffiME 12 ROLAND, MIL TON 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,065.94 12 WOODS Ill, ROBERT L 0.50 CUS-PmME $2,638.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $36,473.44 TCHR.AIDES 12 BAKER, PATRICIA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $11,163.00 12 BURCH, CLAIRE E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,589.56 12 EFIRD, WENDY L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 12 GIBSON, SUSAN Y 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,440.04 12 GRIMMITT, BONNIE S 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 12 HARRIS, TYRONE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,265.24 12 JOHNSON, IRENE B 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,589.56 12 JOHNSON, JOE A 1.00 LAB ATTEND $21,566.00 12 MA YWEA TIIER, ELNORA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,589.56 12 SANDERS, PA TRJCIA A 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 12 WINFREY,VEARLEAN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,589.56 CATEGORY TOTALS: 11.00 $102,781.52 YEARLY TOTALS: 64.00 $1,563,700.34 94 CENTRAL 1,650.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 JAMES, BRENDA F 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $40,247.00 01 PETERSON, MICHAEL W 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $42,403.00 01 ROUSSEAU, NANCY L 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $39,300.50 01 WA TIS, DARRELL J 1.00 AIPRIN SEC $32,745.67 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $154,696.17 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 ADAIR, GLADYS M 1.00 SECATT $16,703.06 02 BRIGGS, DEMETRIA G 1.00 SEC PRIN $14,737.80 02 HEGGS, URSELLA W 1.00 SECATT $15,719.88 02 O'NEAL, JANE 1.00 REG $20,804.00 02 POSillON, VACANT 1.00 PBX 02 RODGERS,FRANCESE 1.00 SEC PRIN 02 ROSENBERGER, BETTY C 1.00 MEDIA CL $14,774.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. '~~\"\"' ''NVO~'M \"'-\"'t',ON 'S\\t.,'Q.V\"\"\\CV. \"0'.V\"T ~a\\a.-v - T\\a~(.'\u0026gt; ~a\\a..--v + Sti.'(le.ndN.(dae.!ol not. i.nc\\ude benefits) -.A YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 SIEGEL, TERESA T 1.00 B/KEEPER $13,755.72 02 STELL,LINDAM 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,229.39 02 TINKLE,BETIY 1.00 SECATT $16,211.47 02 WILLIAMS, CAROLYN J 1.00 SEC GUID $14,182.05 02 WILLIAMS, KELLY D 1.00 SEC PRIN $13,264.13 CATEGORY TOTALS: 12.00 $155,381.50 ELEM.CI..SRM. TCH. 01 CLAY, SHERRI L 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,950.00 01 POST, JULIA A 1.00 KINDER-REG $24,330.00 01 THOMPSON, FLORA DEAN 1.00 KINDER-REG $40,670.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $94,950.00 GUIDANCE 01 BLAIR,SAMK 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $47,775.69 01 CALLAWAY, ELIZABETII W 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $37,159.73 01 GRAVES, JESSICA A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $41,791.36 01 IVEY, DELORES S 1.00 CNSLR-SECD 01 JOHNSON, LYNDA P 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $37,787.20 01 WATSON, PATRICIA A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $39,756.94 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $204,270.92 LIB/AV. 01 ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A 1.00 ASTLIBR $37,836.31 01 DUMAS, ELAINE K 1.00 LIBRN-SECD $37,836.31 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $75,672.62 OTHER PROF. 02 FELLS, JACKIE 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 02 JOHNSON, BENNY D 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 02 MOBLEY, KA TIILEEN H 1.00 NURSE $25,695.00 02 SIMS, JEROME E 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 02 SMITH, FLOYD 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 02 SMITH, JERRY 1.00 SIB SOFR $11 ,794.00 CATEGORY TOT AI..S: 6.00 $84,665.00 OTHR CI..SRM. TCH. 02 FIELDS, WILLIE J 1.00. AIRFRCE $28,887.30 01 JARMON, MYRA M 0.50 SPE-LD $17,233.50 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 39 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 MCDONALD, TIIOMAS A 0.20 ORCHESTR $8, 128.00 01 ROBERTSON JR, TI-IOMAS A 1.00 AIRFRCE $33,765.41 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 2.70 $88,014.21 PRIN 01 HOWARD, RUDOLPH 1.00 SEC PRTN $62,986.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $62,986.40 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 ALLMON, TERRY L 1.00 GEOMTRY-IN 01 ARJCK, JOYCE A 1.00 COORDED $48,744.80 01 BAXLEY, MARY A 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $29,477.00 01 BECKER, MARY C 0.80 ENGLSH-DEV 06 BECKER, MARY C 0.20 READING 01 BENNETT, TIMOTI-IY P 1.00 SPANISH $21 ,680.00 01 BLACKMAN, TONY 1.00 ORAL COM $27,387.00 01 BLESSING, DONALD K 1.00 SPE-M/RET 01 BOONE, EDDIE L 1.00 BOYS PE 01 BOYETT, EDWARD B 1.00 SOC STU $24,892.00 01 BRACK, ROBERT L 1.00 MUSIC $40,670.00 01 BROADNAX-TI IRASHER, BEYERL Y 0.80 ENGLSH-REG $32,536.00 06 BROADNAX-TIIRASHER, BEVERLY 0.20 READING $8, 134.00 01 BROWN, JAMES 0.80 BLDTRAD $35 ,077.87 01 BROWN, JAMES A 1.00 SOC STU $35,759.00 01 BYRNE, ROISIN 1.00 SPANISH $10,278.00 01 CALDWELL, CHERYL D 1.00 ALGEBRA-I 01 CALDWELL, SUZANNE 0 1.00 SPANISH $35,799.00 01 CALLAWAY, NORMAN M 1.00 ISSP $44,524.90 01 CARUTH, PHYLLIS V 1.00 TRJG $40,670.06 01 CHAMBLISS, PATRJCIA A 1.00 FRENCH $35,852.00 01 CLOUD, GAYLE H 1.00 LATIN $35,270.00 01 COBB, JEANT 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $32,005.00 01 COLBURN, MELISSA A 1.00 GLOBAL $34,467.00 01 COLE, JENNIE B 1.00 FRENCH $33,403.00 01 COLLINS, ROBIN R 1.00 HOME ECO $29,433.89 01 COON, SUEL 1.00 ART $37,960.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"fn,s re\\)ort does not ,ndude, Metro\\lo\\itan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY OJ CORTINEZ, KATIIERINE 1.00 SOC STU $35,009.00 01 COX, BERNIE L 1.00 SOC STU $50,046.30 01 CREWS, MARY M 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $32,058.00 01 DANIEL, BRANTON P 1.00 SCI TECH $36,876.00 06 DA VIS, ROBIN L 0.20 READING $5,769.20 01 DA VIS, ROBIN L 0.80 ENGLSH-REG $23,076.80 OJ DEITZ, SANDY G 1.00 CALCULUS $33,403.00 OJ DENNlS,AUDRA T 1.00 SOC STU OJ DONHAM, MELISSA C 1.00 BIOLOGY $35,759.00 01 DYER, JACQUELIN W 1.00 CHEMSTRY OJ EASTER, MARION 0 1.00 ENGLSI I-REG $40,670.00 OJ EVANS, KATIIRYN S 1.00 VOCBUS ED $25,365.05 OJ FITZPATRICK JR, OLIVER 1.00 SOC STU $36,078.00 OJ FUTRELL, BRENDA J 1.00 MARKETCOR $48,744.37 OJ GADBERRY, SARAH E 1.00 AM 1--llST $38,763.00 OJ GADDY, HELEN B 1.00 SPE-MIRET $40,670.00 OJ GATES, KATHY 1.00 GEOMTY-REG OJ GRAHAM, HARRYETTE 1.00 HOME ECO $43,847.34 OJ GRAY,JOEA 1.00 SOC STU $25,989.00 OJ HAMMONS, KAREN A 0.80 ENGLSH-REG $24,361.60 06 HAMMONS, KAREN A 0.20 READING $6,090.40 01 HARDIN, GWENDOLYN E 1.00 GEOMTY-REG $34,467.00 01 HARGIS, ALISON C 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $27,782.00 OJ HENDERSON, SHERRY LOU 1.00 SVFART $23,653.55 01 HESSELSCIIWERDT, RONALD F 1.00 EX IND 01 1--llLL, SHEKETA G 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $29,388.0Q 01 HOFFMAN-MCDERMOTT, MICHELLE G 0.80 ENGLSII-REG 06 HOFFMAN-MCDERMOTT, MICHELLE G 0.20 READING OJ HOGAN, SUSAN P 1.00 ART $19,940.39 OJ HOLLADAY, KATHLEEN T 1.00 ORAL COM $35,347.50 06 HOOPER, BEVERLY R 0.20 READING $5,620.80 01 HOOPER, BEVERLY R 0.80 ENGLSH-REG $22,483.20 01 HUFFORD, GARY W 1.00 CHEMSTRY $27,542.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(docs not include benefits) 41 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 KEARNEY, LESLIE A 1.00 GERMAN $35,270.00 01 LANCE, CHARLES H 1.00 JOURNALI 01 LOYA, SAMUEL T 1.00 SPANISH-AD $23,957.00 06 LUCY, PHYLLIS R 0.20 READlNG $5,829.40 OJ LUCY, PHYLLIS R 0.80 ENGLSH-REG $23,317.60 01 MARSH, EDWARD W 1.00 COMP ST 01 MAYS, GRACIE C 1.00 BIOLOGY $35,270.00 01 MCDONALD, DOROTIIY L 1.00 ENGLSH-REG 01 MCFADDEN, ELIZABETII K 0.20 FRENCH $5,781.40 OJ MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K 0.34 SPEECH $12,735.72 01 MCLENDON, JOANNE B 1.00 HEALTH $40,670.00 01 MCLENNAN, FREDIE D 1.00 IND err $44,259.19 OJ MCMURRAY, VICTOR C 1.00 AMIIIST $28,846.00 01 MEADOWS, MARKE 1.00 OTHRSCI $30,23 I .00 OJ MOGSTAD, BONNIE L 1.00 ARTD 06 MONCRIEF, GWEN V 0.20 READlNG 01 MONCRIEF, GWEN V 0.80 ENGLSH-DEV 01 MOORE, KENT L 1.00 PRE-ALGR $29,649.00 01 NASH, DORIS L 1.00 ORAL COM $35,466.00 01 NASH, L ANGEL 0.80 ENGLSH-DEV $24,361.60 06 NASH, LANGEL 0.20 READlNG $6,090.40 01 PAXTON, VERONICA J 0.80 ENGLSII-DEV $22,033.60 06 PAXTON, VERONICA J 0.20 READlNG $5,508.40 01 PEDIGO, MARY J 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $40,670.00 01 PETERS, DIANE E 1.00 AMERGOV $36,876.00 01 PIERCE, MAUREEN 1.00 HOME ECO $35,752.78 01 POSITION, VACANT 0.60 OFRLAN 01 POSillON, VACANT 1.00 BIOLOGY 06 PREWIT, MARY J 1.00 READlNG $40,670.00 OJ RAMSEY, KA TIILEEN E 1.00 BIOLOGY $30,994.00 01 ROBlNSON, CONSTANCE F 1.00 voe BUSED $43,847.34 01 RUTLEDGE, MARILYN F 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $27,301.00 06 SAIN, LLOYD 0.20 READING Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. 'Th\\s .-e\\\\ort does not ,ndude, Met.-o\\)oUtan Sc.boo\\, and A\\te.-native Lea.-ning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll.  - ' ., - .._ \"'- ._,.  ., .... ..,.,_, 'n-  ...,. '' ,,.  ...., . ..-,, .. - YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY = 01 SAIN, LLOYD 0.80 ENGLSH-DEV 01 SCHLESINGER, DEBRA S 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $29,562.50 01 SHOFNER, KIRBY E 1.00 BIOLOGY $26,498.00 01 SIEGEL, LARRY B 1.00 AM HIST $39,758.55 01 SMITH, DA YID M 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $28,043.00 01 SNODGRASS, AMY L 1.00 BIOLOGY $26,498.00 01 TAYLOR, ROBERTM 1.00 OTHRSCI $28,043.00 01 TAYLOR, TRAVIS F 1.00 BAND $22,367.00 06 THOMPSON, LOIS B 0.20 READING $7,001.80 01 THOMPSON, LOIS B 0.80 ENGLSH-DEV $28,007.20 01 THOMPSON, NANCY K 1.00 voe BUS ED $44,347.34 01 VENABLE, GLORIA 0 1.00 voe BUSED $43,847.34 01 WATSON, BILLYN 1.00 MATH $41,421.00 01 WEBB JR, CECIL H 1.00 COORDED 01 WHITE, DIANE B 1.00 SPANISH $31,255.00 01 WILDER, BARBARA A 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $32,118.00 01 WILLIAMS, BETTYE F 1.00 ISSP $39,456.00 01 WILLIAMSON, MARGARET A 1.00 SPE-M/RET $37,627.00 01 WILLIS, EULA M 1.00 voe BUS ED $42,541.36 01 WILSON, NANCY L 1.00 ART $38,763.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 98.94 $2,735,363.48 SERV.WKRS. 02 BOWMAN, RUTIIIE M 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 02 BRIGGS, BOBBY C 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 02 CLOUD JR, WILLIAM L 1.00 BLDG ENG $22,598.00 02 DOBBINS JR, ALBERT L 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 02 DUNHOO, KERVIS R 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,229.00 02 FAGAN, ROSIE L 1.00 A-HEADCUS $13,728.00 02 GIVENS, WILLIE T 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,875.00 02 HUDSON,HAROLD 1.00 CUSTODAN $6,843.20 02 JACKSON, KENNETI-1 RAY 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,199.00 02 JOHNSON, GRACE E 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,684.92 02 MCKISICK, DERRICK 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,523.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 43 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 POSITION, VACANf 1.00 CUSTODAN 02 ROBERTS, JOIIN A 1.00 BLDG ENG $15,033.20 02 TIMMONS, CAL VIN 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 14.00 $166,222.32 TCHR.AIDES 02 HILL, DARLENE 0.20 LAB ATTEND $1,763.20 02 LLOYD, OTTIMJS C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,367.68 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.20 $8,130.88 YEARLY TOTALS: 150.84 $3,830,353.50 95 CENTRAL 1,565.00 ASST. PRIN-NT 01 JAMES, BRENDA F 1.00 A/PRINSEC $43,606.00 01 PETERSON, MJCIIAEL W 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $43,707.00 01 ROUSSEAU, NANCY L 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $41,625.50 01 WA TIS, DARRELL J 1.00 A/PRIN SEC CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.00 $128,938.50 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 ADAIR, GLADYS M 1.00 SECATI $17,194.65 02 BRIGGS, DEMETRIA G 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,229.39 02 BROOKS, RUBYE V 1.00 PBX $11,199.57 02 HEGGS, URSELLA W 1.00 SECATI $16,211.47 02 O'NEAL, JANE 1.00 REG $21,382.00 02 ROSENBERGER, BETTY C 1.00 MEDIA CL $15,013.58 02 SIEGEL, TERESA T 1.00 B/KEEPER $14,737.80 02 STELL, LINDA M 1.00 SEC PRIN $16,211.47 02 STONE, MARY J 1.00 SEC PRIN $19,562.26 02 TINKLE, BETTY 1.00 SECATI $17,194.65 02 WILLIAMS, CAROLYN J 1.00 SEC GUID $14,312.45 02 WILLIAMS, KELLY D 1.00 SEC PRIN $12,264.95 CATEGORY TOTALS: 12.00 $190,514.24 ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 01 CLAY, SHERRIL 1.00 KINDER-REG $31,041.00 01 POST, JULIA A 1.00 KINDER-REG $25,368.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This re\\\\Ort does not include, Metro\\lo\\itan Schoo\\, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 THOMPSON, FLORA DEAN 1.00 KINDER-REG $41 ,05 1.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $97,460.00 GUIDANCE OJ BLAIR, SAMK 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $48,216.22 OJ CALLA WAY, ELIZABETII W 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $38,381.25 01 GRAVES, JESSICA A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $44,258.11 OJ JOHNSON, LYNDA P 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $39,515.19 01 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 CNSLR-SECD 01 WATSON, PATRICIA A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $40,128.89 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $210,499.66 LIB/AV. 01 ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A 1.00 ASTLIBR $38,190.30 01 DUMAS, ELAINE K 1.00 LIBRN-SECD $38,190.30 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $76,380.60 OTHER PROF. 02 ADAMS, DONALD D. 1.00 SIB SOFR $9,047.34 02 FELLS, JACKIE 1.00 SIB SOFR $12,143.00 02 MOBLEY, KATIILEEN II 1.00 NURSE $26,498.00 02 SIMS, JEROME E 1.00 SIB SOFR $12,143.00 02 SMITII, FLOYD 1.00 SIB SOFR $12,143.00 02 SMITII, JERRY 1.00 SIB SOFR $12,859.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.00 $84,833.34 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 02 FIELDS, WILLIE J 1.00 AIR FRCE $30,439.46 01 JARMON, MYRA M 0.60 SPE-LD $21 ,360.00 OJ MCDONALD, IBOMAS A 0.20 ORCHESTR $8,363.20 01 ROBERTSON JR, TIIOMAS A 1.00 AIR FRCE $34,368.6S CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.80 $94,531.31 PRlN 01 HOW ARD, RUDOLPH 1.00 SEC PRJN $68,493.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $68,493.00 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. OJ ARICK, JOYCE A 1.00 COORDED $49,195.26 01 BAXLEY, MARY A 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $30,551.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 45 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 01 BECKER, MARY C 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $28,853.00 01 BENNETT, TIMOTIIY P 1.00 SPANISH $22,693.00 01 BLACKMAN, TONY 1.00 ORAL COM $29,396.00 01 BLEVINS, PAULETTE 1.00 BIOLOGY $23,443.00 01 BOYETT, EDWARD B 1.00 SOC STU $25,935.00 OJ BRACK, ROBERT L 1.00 MUSIC $41,051.00 OJ BROADNAX-TIIRASHER, BEVERLY 1.00 ENGLSI I-REG $41,051.00 OJ BROWN, JAMES A 1.00 SOC STU $36,087.00 OJ CALDWELL, SUZANNE 0 1.00 SPANISH $36,938.00 01 CALLAWAY, NORMAN M 1.00 BOYS PE $44,869.90 01 CARR, PA TIERSON W 0.60 ALGEBRA-I OJ CARUlll, PHYLLIS V 1.00 TRIG $41,051.00 01 CHAMBLISS, PA TRICIA A 1.00 FRENCII $36,998.00 01 CHERRY, KARLA KIM 1.00 JOURNAL! $28,878.89 OJ CLOUD, GAYLE H 1.00 LATIN OJ COBB,JEANT 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $33,108.00 OJ COLBURN, MELISSA A 1.00 GLOBAL $35,600.00 OJ COLE, JENNIE B 1.00 FRENCH $35,600.00 OJ COLLINS, ROBIN R 1.00 HOME ECO $30,583.17 OJ COON, SUEL 1.00 ART $40,240.00 OJ COOPER, VIRGINIA R 0.40 ARTD $13,487.12 01 CORTINEZ, KA THERINE 1.00 SOC STU $35,337.00 OJ COX, BERNIE L 1.00 SOC STU $50,427.30 OJ DANIEL, BRANTON P 1.00 SCI TECH $38,190.30 OJ DEITZ, SANDY G 1.00 CALCULUS $35,600.00 OJ DONHAM, MELISSA C 1.00 BIOLOGY $36,087.00 OJ DYER, JACQUELIN W 1.00 CHEMSTRY $39,126.00 01 EASTER, MARlON 0 1.00 ENGLSil-REG $41,051.00 01 EVANS, KAlllRYN S 1.00 voe BUS ED $26,476.59 OJ FITZPATRICK JR, OLIVER 1.00 SOC STU $38,248.60 OJ FUTRELL, BRENDA J 1.00 MARKETCOR $49,194.83 OJ GADBERRY, SARAH E 1.00 AM HIST $39,126.00 OJ GADDY, HELEN B 1.00 SPE-M/RET $41,051.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. 'Yn,,.. 'l'C.\\\\Ort doe\" no\\ ,ndude, Me\\'l'O\\\\o\\i\\an Sc.boo\\, and A\\\\e'l'native l...ea .. ninl!, Center and is based on all funds and all em11loyees currently active on payroll. SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 GATES, KATIIY 1.00 GEOM1Y-REG $30,211 .00 01 GRAHAM, HARRYETfE 1.00 HOME ECO $44,258. 11 01 GRAY, JOEA 1.00 SOC STU $27,025.00 01 HALL-JONES, BETSY 1.00 SPE-M/RET $30,211 .00 01 HAMMONS, KAREN A 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $31,548.00 01 HARDIN, GWENDOLYN E 1.00 GEOMTY-REG $35,600.00 01 HARGIS, ALISON C 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $28,853.00 01 HARVEY, CA TI IERINE ANITA 1.00 BIOLOGY $20,427.83 01 HOFFMAN-MCDERMOTT, MICHELLE G 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $24 ,254.00 01 HOGAN, SUSAN P 1.00 ART $26,746.00 01 HOLLADAY, KATI-ILEEN T 1.00 ORAL COM $35,658.50 01 HOOPER, BEYERL Y R 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $29,177.00 OJ HUFFORD, GARY W 1.00 CHEMSTRY $28,610.00 01 KEARNEY, LESLIE A 1.00 GERMAN $36,411 .00 OJ KRATZKE, ROBIN R 0.80 SPANISH 01 LOYA, SAMUEL T 1.00 SPANISII-AD $26,041 .00 01 LUCY, PHYLLIS R 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $30,231.00 01 MARSH, EDWARD W 1.00 COMP ST $21 ,072.00 OJ MAYS, GRACIE C 1.00 BIOLOGY $36,411 .00 01 MCDONALD, DOROTI-IY L 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $40,240.00 OJ MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K 0.34 SPEECH $13,130.46 01 MCLENDON, JOANNE B 1.00 HEALTII $41 ,051 .00 01 MCLENNAN, FREDIE D 1.00 IND err $44,667.08 01 MCMURRAY, VICTOR C 1.00 AMI-DST $29,927.00 01 MEADOWS, MARKE 1.00 OTIIR SCI $31,325.00 01 MOORE, KENT L 1.00 PRE-ALGR $30,737.09 01 NASH, DORIS L 1.00 ORAL COM $36,602.00 01 NASH, L ANGEL 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $32,264.50 OJ PAIGE JR, WILLIE 0.60 EX IND $26,554.87 01 PAXTON, VERONICA J 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $28,610.00 01 PEDIGO, MARY J 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $41 ,051 .00 01 PETERS, DlANE E 1.00 AMER GOV $37,221 .00 01 PEYTON, EMMA J 1.00 COORDED $44,859.24 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD 1.NFORMA TION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Sti1Jends(docs not include benefits) 47 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY OJ PIERCE, MAUREEN 1.00 HOME ECO $36,088.08 OJ PREWIT, MARY J 1.00 READING $41,051.00 01 ROBINSON, CONSTANCE F 1.00 voe BUS ED $44,258.11 OJ RUlLEDGE, MARILYN F 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $28,367.00 OJ SAIN,LLOYD 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $29,927.00 OJ SCHLESlNGER, DEBRA S 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $29,927.00 01 SHOFNER, KIRBY E 1.00 BIOLOGY $27,556.00 01 SIEGEL, LARRY B 1.00 AM HIST $40,932.26 01 SMITH, DA YID M 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $29,117.00 01 SNODGRASS, AMY L 1.00 BIOLOGY $27,556.00 OJ TAYLOR, ROBERTM 1.00 OTHRSCI $29,117.00 OJ THOMAS, AARON BRADY 1.00 BAND $26,851.00 01 THOMPSON, LOIS B 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $35,337.00 01 THOMPSON, NANCY K 1.00 voe BUS ED $44,758.11 01 THREATT, CHRISTO Pl IER ERROL 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $22,784.80 OJ VENABLE, GLORIA 0 1.00 voe BUS ED $44,258.11 01 WATSON, BILLYN 1.00 MATH $41,802.00 OJ WILDER, BARBARA A 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $32,419.00 01 WILLIAMS, BETTYE F 1.00 JSSP $37,221.00 01 WILLIAMSON, MARGARET A 1.00 SPE-M/RET $37,972.00 01 WILLIS, EULA M 1.00 voe BUS ED $42,932.72 01 WILSON, NANCY L 1.00 ART $39,126.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 87.74 $2,965,868.74 SERV.WKRS. 02 BARNEY, NORMAN L 1.00 CUSTODAN $5,525.41 02 BOWMAN, RUTIIIE M 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.09 02 BRIGGS, BOBBY C 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 02 CLOUD JR, WILLIAM L 1.00 BLDG ENG $23 ,270.00 02 DUNHOO, KERVIS R 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,539.00 02 FAGAN, ROSIE L 1.00 A-HEADCUS $14,112.00 02 GIVENS, WILLIE T 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $17,875.00 02 HARRIS, DEBORAH A 1.00 CUSTODAN $1,515.03 02 HUDSON,HAROLD 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 Note: Em\\lloyees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"fh,s re\\\\ort does not ,ndude, Metro\\\\olitan Schoo\\, and A\\ternati.ve Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. . . - .. \u0026lt;.\n,... ..... .. ... ~ ...... .-..u, .. \"\"\"''I.ow\".-...-~-\" YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 02 JACKSON, KENNETT I RAY 02 JOHNSON, GRACE E 02 POSITION, VACANT 02 ROBERTS, JOHN A 02 TIMMONS, CALVIN CATEGORY TOTALS: TCHR.AIDES 02 HILL, DARLENE 02 LLOYD, OTTIMIS C CATEGORY TOTALS: YEARLY TOTALS: 96 CENTRAL 1,528.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 JAMES, BRENDA F 0 I MORRIS, WILLIE C 01 ROUSSEAU, NANCY L 0 I WHITEHORN, DANIEL W CATEGORY TOTALS: CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 ADAIR, GLADYS M 02 ALLMON, CHARLOTTE 02 BRIGGS, DEMETRIA G 02 HEGGS, URSELLA W 02 O'NEAL, JANE 02 POSITION, OPEN 02 ROSENBERGER, BETTY C 02 SIEGEL, TERESA T 02 STELL, LINDA M 02 STONE, MARY J 02 TINKLE, BETTY 02 WILLIAMS, CAROLYN J CATEGORY TOTALS: ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 14.00 0.20 1.00 1.20 139.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.00 JOB CODE CUSTODAN CUSTODAN CUSTODAN BLDG ENG CUSTODAN LAB ATTEND AIDE-SVA A/PRINSEC A/PRIN SEC A/PRIN SEC A/PRIN SEC SECJ\\TT SEC PRIN SEC PRIN SECATT REG PBX MEDIA CL B/KEEPER SEC PRIN SEC PRIN SECATT SECGUID SALARY $8, 199.00 $15,475.20 $14,534.00 $149,019.64 $1 ,847.20 $6,440.04 $8,287.24 $4,074,826.27 $45,647.00 $45,010.29 $42,666.50 $41 ,212.40 $174,536.19 $17, 194.65 $12,807.05 $15,719.88 $15 ,057.44 $21 ,382.00 $15,013 .58 $15,229.39 $16,703.06 $21 ,382.00 $17,194.65 $14,804.04 $182,487.74 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 49 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 01 LEFLER, LYNN C 01 POST, JULIA A 01 TIIOMPSON, FLORA DEAN CATEGORY TOTALS: GUIDANCE 01 BLAIR,SAMK 01 CALLAWAY, ELIZABETII W 01 GRAYES, JESSICA A 01 HA WTIIORNE, PEGGY CARNAHAN Ol JOHNSON, LYNDA P CATEGORY TOTALS: LIB/AV. 01 ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A 01 DUMAS, ELAINE K CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHER PROF. 02 FELLS, JACKIE 02 GUY,KIMT 02 LOVE, HOWARD LOUIS 02 SIMS, JEROME E 02 SMITII, ANDREA 02 SMITII, FLOYD CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 02 FIELDS, WILLIE J 01 MCDONALD, TIIOMAS A 01 ROBERTSON JR, TIIOMAS A 01 WILLIAMS, GARY D CATEGORY TOTALS: PRIN 01 HOWARD, RUDOLPH CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 01 ARICK, JOYCE A Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.60 2.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 JOB CODE KINDER-REG KINDER-REG KINDER-REG CNSLR-SECD CNSLR-SECD CNSLR-SECD CNSLR-SECD CNSLR-SECD ASTLIBR LIBRN-SECD SIB SOFR NURSE SIB SOFR SIB SOFR SIB SOFR SIB SOFR AIRFRCE ORCHESTR AIRFRCE SPE-LD SEC PRIN COORDED SALARY $24,314.00 $26,179.00 $41,861.00 $92,354.00 $49,151.78 $39,255.61 $45,131.39 $32,265.05 $40,388.47 $206,192.30 $39,021.39 $40,144.91 $79,166.30 $13,248.00 $22,693.00 $12,143.00 $12,492.00 $10,833.00 $12,492.00 $83,901.00 $31,042.70 $8,525.40 $34,970.81 $21,587.40 $96,126.31 $69,665.00 $69,665.00 $50,152.92 'l'bh ..-e\\)ort does not ,ndude, Met..-o\\)o\\\\t.an Schoo\\, and A\\te..-native Learning Center and is based on al\\ funds and al\\ employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE OJ BAXLEY, MARYA 0 J BECKER, MARY C 0 I BENNETT, TIMOTIN P 01 BLEVINS, PAULETTE 0 I BOYETT, EDWARD B 0 I BRACK, ROBERT L 01 BROADNAX-TIIRASHER, BEVERLY 0 I BROWN, JAMES A 01 CALDWELL, SUZANNE 0 01 CALLAWAY, NORMAN M 0 I CARR, PA TIERSON W 01 CARUTII, PHYLLIS V 01 CHAMBLISS, PATRICIA A 01 CHERRY, KARLA KIM 0 I COBB, JEAN T 01 COLBURN, MELISSA A 0 I COLE, JENNIE B 0 I COLLINS, ROBIN R 01 COON, SUE L 0 I COOPER, VIRGINIA R 0 I CORTINEZ, KA TIIERINE 0 I COX, BERNIE L 01 DANIEL, BRANTON P 01 DEITZ, SANDY G 01 DONHAM, MELISSA C 01 DYER, JACQUELIN W 01 EASTER, MARION 0 01 EVANS, KA TI-IRYN S 01 FAKOURI, CATIN H 01 FITZPATRICKJR,OLIVER 0 I FUTRELL, BRENDA J 01 GADBERRY, SARAH E 01 GADDY, HELEN B Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JOB CODE ALGEBRA-I ENGLSH-DEV SPANISH BIOLOGY WORLDH MUSIC ENGLSH-REG SOC STU SPANISH BOYS PE ALGEBRA-I TRIG FRENCH JOURNAL! ENGLSH-REG GLOBAL FRENCH HOME ECO ART ARTD SOC STU SOC STU SCI TECH CALCULUS BIOLOGY PHYSICS ENGLSII-REG voe BUSED ORAL COM SOC STU MARKETCOR AM IIlST SPE-M/RET SALARY $31 ,36 1.00 $29,664 .00 $23,504.00 $24,254.00 $26,746.00 $41 ,861.00 $41,861.00 $36,897.00 $37,748.00 $45,706.90 $29,117.00 $41,861 .00 $37,809.00 $29,752.17 $33,919.00 $14,564.40 $36,411.00 $31 ,456.45 $41 ,051 .00 $12,581.20 $36,147.00 $51 ,267.15 $39,021.39 $36,411 .00 $36,897.00 $39,936.09 $41,861.00 $20,642 .19 $10,095.48 $40,869.55 $50, I 52.49 $39,126.00 $41,861.00 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) st YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 GATES, KATIIY 1.00 GEOMlY-REG $32,136.00 01 GILLIAME, JOHN W 0.60 CHEMSTRY $7,770.30 01 GRAHAM, 1-IARRYEITE 1.00 HOME ECO $45,131.39 01 GRI\\Y,JOEA 1.00 SOC STU $26,885.00 01 HALL-JONES, BETSY 1.00 SPE-M/RET $31,021.00 01 HAMMONS, KAREN A 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $32,358.00 01 HARDIN, GWENDOLYN E 1.00 GEOMlY-REG $36,411.00 01 HARGIS, ALISON C 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $30,737.00 01 HARVEY, CATHERINE ANITA 1.00 BIOLOGY $22,126.00 01 HOFFMAN-MCDERMOTT, MICHELLE G 1.00 ENGLSI-1-REG $25,064.00 01 HOGAN, SUSAN P 1.00 ART $27,556.00 01 HOLLADAY, KATHLEEN T 1.00 ORAL COM $35,033.00 01 HUFFORD, GARY W 1.00 CHEMSTRY $29,420.00 01 KALB, MARTI IA MELINDA 1.00 ORAL COM $22,693.00 01 KEARNEY, LESLIE A 1.00 GERMAN $37,221.00 01 LIGON, MARIANNE WYNNE 1.00 LATIN $25,935.00 01 LOY A, SAMUEL T 1.00 SPANJSII-AD $27,926.00 01 MARSH, EDWARD W 1.00 COMP ST $22,937.00 01 MAYS, GRACrE C 1.00 BIOLOGY $37,221.00 01 MCDONALD, DOROTHY L 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $41,051.00 01 MCGUIRE, STEPIIEN K 0.34 SPEECH $13,406.20 01 MCLENDON, JOANNE B 1.00 HEALTH $41,861.00 01 MCLENNAN, FREDIE D 1.00 IND err $45,624.74 01 MCMURRAY, VICTORC 1.00 AMHIST $30,737.00 01 MEADOWS, MARKE 1.00 OTHRSCJ $32,136.00 01 MONZON, VICTORIA 1.00 SPANISH $21,622.90 01 MOORE, KENT L 1.00 PRE-ALGR $31,548.00 01 NASH, DORIS L 1.00 ORAL COM $37,412.00 01 NASH, L ANGEL 1.00 ENGLSI I-DEV $33,791.00 01 PAIGE JR, WILLIE 1.00 EX IND $45,131.39 01 PAXTON, VERONICA J 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $29,420.00 01 PEDIGO, MARY J 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $41,861.00 01 PETERS, DIANE E 1.00 AMERGOV $38,031.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. 'l'h,s re\\)ort does not ,nc\\ude, Metro\\)o\\\\tan Schoo\\, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all em11loyees currently active on 11ayroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY OJ PEYTON, EMMA J 1.00 COORD ED $47,941 .82 OJ PIERCE, MAUREEN 1.00 HOME ECO $36,961.36 OJ POSITION, VACANT 1.00 ENGLSH-REG 01 PREWJT, MARY J 1.00 READING $41,861.00 01 ROBINSON, CONSTANCE F 1.00 voe BUS ED $45,131.39 OJ RUTLEDGE, MARILYN F 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $29,177.00 OJ SAIN, LLOYD 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $30,737.00 01 SCHLESINGER, DEBRA S 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $30,737.00 01 SHOFNER, KIRBY E 1.00 BIOLOGY $28,367.00 OJ SIEGEL, LARRY B 1.00 AM HlST $41 ,829.55 01 SNODGRASS, AMY L 1.00 BIOLOGY $28,367.00 01 THOMAS, AARON BRADY 1.00 BAND $28,715.00 01 THOMPSON, LOIS B 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $36,147.00 01 THOMPSON, NANCY K 1.00 voe BUS ED $45,631.39 01 THREATT, CHRISTOPHER ERROL 1.00 ENGLSH-DEV $24,087.20 01 VENABLE, GLORIA 0 1.00 voe BUS ED $45,131.39 01 WATSON, BILLYN 1.00 MATH $42,612.00 01 WILDER, BARBARA A 1.00 ALGEBRA-I $33 ,229.00 01 WILLIAMS, BETTYE F 1.00 ISSP $38,031 .00 01 WILLIAMSON, MARGARET A 1.00 SPE-M/RET $38,781.00 OJ WILLIS, EULA M 1.00 voe BUS ED $43,806.00 01 WILSON, NANCY L 1.00 ART $39,936.00 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 86.34 $2,998,997.31 SERV.WKRS. 02 BARNEY, NORMAN L 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,523.00 02 BRIGGS, BOBBY C 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,956.09 02 DUNHOO, KERVIS R 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,907.00 02 FAGAN, ROSIE L 1.00 A-IIEADCUS $14,303.80 02 GIVENS, WILLIE T 1.00 CUST-HEAD $18,355.00 02 HUDSON, HAROLD 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,245.00 02 JACKSON, KENNETH RAY 1.00 CUSTODAN $8,523.00 02 POSITION, OPEN 1.00 CUSTODAN 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 CUSTODAN Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on llayroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 53 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 POSITION.VACANT 1.00 CUSTODAN 02 TIMMONS, CAL VIN 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,956.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 11.00 $99,768.80 TCHR.AIDES 02 LLOYD, OTilMIS C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,589.56 02 l'vlERRILL, ANNETTE M 0.20 LAB ATTEND $1 ,867.47 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.20 $8,457.03 YEARLY TOTALS: 134.34 $4,091,651.98 94 CHICOT 519.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 CLEVELAND, ELLEAN D 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $44,102.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $44,102.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 LUCY, BRENDA F 0.60 l'vlEDIA CL $8,595 .60 02 TUCKER, LOUISE 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 WALKER, CONNIE S 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,719.88 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.60 $41,510.13 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN H 1.00 ELEMV $27,782.00 01 EANS, SYL VERENE G 1.00 ELEM II $31 ,797.00 01 HARRIS, BRENDA G 1.00 ELEM! $20,074.00 01 HOLLINGSWORlH, JUDY A 1.00 ELEMlll $30,512.00 01 ISBELL, PAl'vlELON J 1.00 ELEM IV $33,403.00 01 JOHNSON, DEBRA J 1.00 ELEM II $26,739.00 01 JOHNSON, JORGE A 1.00 ELEMV $23 ,286.00 01 KERR, PAULA D 1.00 KINDER-REG $24,892.00 01 LAMBERT, BRENDA L 1.00 ELEM III $28,104.00 01 MALLETT, ORA D 1.00 ELEM VI $23,286.00 01 MILLER, ELIZABETH W 1.00 ELEM IV $35,049.00 01 MIMS, RICHARD L 1.00 ELEM VI $36,655.00 01 MIMS, SANDRA J 1.00 4 YR OLD $39,064.00 01 MORGAN, SHIRLEY A 1.00 ELEM II 01 MURPII, KATIE F 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,388.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"I:\\\\,., Te\\)ort doe., no\\ ,ndude, Me\\TO\\)o\\i\\an Sc\\\\oo\\, and A\\\\ernative Lcarnin\\!, Center and is based on all funds and all em1lloyees currently active on llayroll . .. ~ ... .. - -- YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 0 I NEAL, LINDA K 0 I PETilJS, IDA M 01 POSITION, VACANT 01 POSITION, VACANT 0 I ROSE, SARA G 0 l SABO, DEBBIE L 0 l SHANKS, BETI-1 L 01 SIMPSON, KIMBERLY D 0 l WELLS, JEANNIE L 0 l WILLIAMS, ERMA J CATEGORY TOTALS: GUIDANCE 0 l BALMAZ, BETIYE M 01 SMITI-1, ALMA F CATEGORY TOTALS: LIB/AV. 0 l CRAVEN, ERNESTINE C CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHER PROF. 02 HAYMAN, KIMBERLY B CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 BROWN, KATI-ILEEN M l-ilCKS, KA TI-ILEEN F JOHNSON, BRENDA F PRIN 01 01 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0 l PRESLAR, OTIS M CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BAILEY, JACK H 01 BEDOW, LAURA M 06 GERSHNER, VICKI M 06 HARPER, Sl-ilRLEY B Note: Em1lloyees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25.00 1.00 0.80 1.80 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.20 1.00 1.00 2.20 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.20 JOB CODE ELEM! ELEMVI ELEM III ELEM I ELEM Ill KINDER-REG ELEMV ELEM I ELEM II ELEM IV CNSLR-ELEM CNSLR-ELEM LIBRN-ELEM NURSE SPE-VISUAL SPE-LD SPE-LD ELE PRIN PE SPEC SPE-M/RET READING MATI-1 SPEC SALARY $21,680.00 $35,270.00 $26,498.00 $31,255.00 $31,556.00 $20,074.00 $29,255.04 $27,542.00 $633,161.04 $32,339.00 $24,795.20 $57,134.20 $35,961.73 $35,961.73 $10,840.00 $10,840.00 $6,949.60 $38,763.00 $30,512.00 $76,224.60 $59,233.62 $59,233.62 $16,825.80 $33,664.00 $36,876.00 $8,134.00 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 55 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 06 1-llCKS, BARBARA A 1.00 MA TH-Cl-IP I $30,753.00 OJ IGWE, CARRIE MOORE 0.50 SPE-N/CATG $13,369.50 01 LOVE, VICKI L 1.00 SPE-M/RET 06 MADDOX, CYNTIIIA I 1.00 READING $32,861.00 01 MATLOCK, NANCY S 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $32,600.00 01 MCILROY, nLL M 1.00 SPEC ED $29,147.00 01 TORAN, STEVE A 1.00 MUSIC $28,104.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.30 $262,334.30 SERV.WKRS. 02 MORGAN, LULA 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,245.00 02 SMlTH, RUFUS 1.00 CU ST-HEAD $1 6,838.20 02 STORAY, JAMES 0.50 CUS-PmME $2,130.75 02 SUMMONS, ELOISE W 1.00 CUSTODAN $14,534.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.50 $43,747.95 TCHR.AIDES 02 BOYD, KA TI-ILEEN 1.00 AIDE-REGLR 02 CUNNINGS, GEORGIA L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 DALE, SUSAN M 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 HOOD, KAYE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,438.40 02 MCDOWELL, PATSY L 1.00 LAB ATTEND $10,411.00 02 MlTCHELL, DIONNE E 1.00 AIDE-SVA $2,719.20 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 AIDE-REGLR 02 THOMAS, MATTIE M 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 TIDWELL, CATHY V 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 WATKINS, RENEE L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,051.20 02 WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D 1.00 LAB ATTEND $10,411.00 02 WILLIAMS, SHERRY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,734.40 02 WILLIAMS, SHERRY A 1.00 AIDE-SVA $2,840.64 CATEGORY TOTALS: 13.00 $83,249.84 YEARLY TOTALS: 60.90 $1,347,499.41 95 CHICOT 480.00 ASST.PR IN-NT 01 CLEVELAND, ELLEAN D 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $45,408.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"fh,s '\"\"-\\\\Ort does not inc\\ude, Me\\l\"O\\\\o\\i\\an Schoo\\, and A\\\\ernative Lea.-ning Center and is based on al\\ funds and al\\ employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE CATEGORY TOTALS: CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 LUCY, BRENDA F 02 TUCKER, LOUISE 02 WALKER, CONNIE S CATEGORY TOTALS: ELEM.CLSRM.TCH. 0 l BRYANT, GEORGIE H 0 l BUTLER, TERRI L 0 l EANS, SYL VERENE G 0 l HARRIS, BRENDA G 0 l HOLLlNGSWORIB, JUDY A 01 ISBELL, PAMELON J 01 JOHNSON, JORGE A 01 KERR, PAULA D 0 l MALLETT, ORA D 0 l MILLER, ELIZABETH W 01 MIMS, RICHARD L 01 MIMS, SANDRA J 0 l MURPH, KA TIE F 0 l NEAL, LINDA K 0 l PETTUS, IDA M 0 l ROSE, SARA G 01 SABO, DEBBIE L 0 l SHANKS, BEIB L 0 l SIMPSON, KIMBERLY D 01 WELLS, JEANNIE L 0 l WILLIAMS, ERMA J 01 WILLIAMS, FLORA V CATEGORY TOTALS: GUIDANCE 0 l BALMAZ, BETTYE M 0 l SMIIB, ALMA F CATEGORY TOTALS: Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 I.DO I.DO I.DO 3.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 I.DO I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD I.DO 1.00 I.OD 1.00 I.DO 1.00 I.DO 1.00 22.00 I.DO I.OD 2.00 JOB CODE MEDIA CL SEC PRIN SEC PRIN ELEMV ELEM II ELEM II ELEM I ELEM III ELEM IV ELEMV KINDER-REG ELEM VI ELEM IV ELEM VI 4 YR OLD KINDER-REG ELEM I ELEM VI ELEM III KINDER-REG ELEMV ELEM I ELEM II ELEM IV ELEM III CNSLR-ELEM CNSLR-ELEM SALARY $45,408.00 $15,013.58 $17,194.65 $17,203.07 $49,411.30 $25,125.00 $32,905.00 $21,072.00 $31,609.00 $34,526.00 $24,314.00 $25,935.00 $24,314.00 $36,188.00 $37,809.00 $40,240.00 $30,474.00 $22,693.00 $36,411.00 $27,556.00 $32,358.00 $32,662.00 $21,072.00 $32,662.00 $28,610.00 $29,988.00 $628,523.00 $33,453.00 $33,169.00 $66,622.00 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 57 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY LIB/AV. 01 CRAVEN, ERNESTINE C 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $37, 130.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,130.40 OTHER PROF. 02 HAYMAN, KJMBERL YB 0.80 NURSE $ I 7,986.40 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 0.80 $17,986.40 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 BROWN, KATHLEEN M 0.20 SPE-VISUAL $7,176.80 01 HICKS, KATill.,EEN F 1.00 SPE-LD $39,126.00 01 JOHNSON, BRENDA F 1.00 SPE-LD $31,609.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.20 $77,911.80 PRIN 01 PRESLAR, OTIS M 1.00 ELE PRIN $59,592.95 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $59,592.95 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 BAILEY, JACK H 0.60 PE SPEC $17,470.20 01 BEDOW, LAURA M 1.00 SPE-M/RET $34,790.00 06 GERSHNER, VICKJ M 1.00 READING $37,221.00 06 HARPER, SHIRLEY B 0.50 MATIISPEC $20,525.50 06 HICKS, BARBARA A 1.00 MATI-I-CllP I $31,852.00 01 JOHNSON, MARILYN F 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $28,367.00 01 LOVE, VICKJ L 1.00 SPE-M/RET $28,991.67 06 MADDOX, CYNTI-IIA I 1.00 READING 01 MATLOCK, NANCY S 1.00 G\u0026amp;T $33,716.00 01 MCll.,ROY, ITLL M 1.00 SPEC ED $30,231.00 01 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 MUSIC 01 POTEET, LISA B 0.50 SPEECH $15,916.0D CATEGORY TOTALS: 10.60 $279,080.37 SERV.WKRS. 02 MORGAN, LULA 1.00 CUSTODAN $10,554.00 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 CUSTODAN 02 POSITION, VACANT 0.50 CUS-PffiME 02 SMITH, RUFUS 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,318.20 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.50 $27,872.20 TCHR.AIDES Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"\"f\\1.,s re\\\\ort does no\\ ,ndude, Me\\ro\\)o\\\u0026gt;\\an Sc\\1.oo\\, and /11.\\ternaHve uarninl!, Center and is based on all funds and all em11loyees currently active on 11ayroll. CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 CHRISTIANSON, ALICE 1.00 ATDE-REGLR $7,533.71 02 CUNNINGS, GEORGIA L 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 DALE, SUSAN M 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 ESTRADA, EL VIA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,183.00 02 ORA Y, ALICE REDDEN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $2,995 .74 02 HARDIN, ELLAN M 1.00 AIDE-SVA $2,995 .74 JO IIOOD, KAYE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,745.84 02 MARTS, GLENDA RAE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,183 .00 02 MCDOWELL, PATSY L 1.00 LAB ATTEND $10,4 I 1.00 10 MITCHELL, CLEO EDNA 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,788.20 02 RENFRO, SHARON 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 SCALES, KECIS D 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,183.00 02 THOMAS, MATTIE M 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 02 TIDWELL, CA THY V 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $I0,4 I 1.00 02 WATKINS, RENEE L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $6,753.08 02 WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,411.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 16.00 $116,238.31 YEARLY TOTALS: 63.10 $1,405,776.73 96 CHICOT 455.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 CLEVELAND, ELLEAN D 1.00 A/PRIN ELE $46,449.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $46,449.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 LUCY, BRENDA F 1.00 MEDIA CL $15,013.58 02 TUCKER, LOUlSE 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 WALKER, CONNIE S 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,694.66 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $49,902.89 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BRYANT, GEORGIE H 1.00 ELEMV $29,117.00 01 DA VIS, LANITA J 1.00 ELEM I $23,504.00 01 EANS, SYL VERENE G 1.00 ELEM II $33,716.00 01 HARRIS, BRENDA G 1.00 ELEMI $2 I ,883.00 01 HOLLINGSWORTII, JUDY A 1.00 ELEM III $32,419.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 59 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 01 ISBELL, PAMELON J 1.00 ELEM IV $30,911.42 01 JOHNSON, JORGE A 1.00 ELEMV $25, 125.00 01 KERR, PA ULA D 1.00 KINDER-REG $26,746.00 01 MALLETT, ORA D 1.00 ELEM VI $25,125.00 01 MILLER, ELIZABETH W 1.00 ELEM IV $36,998.00 01 MIMS, RICHARD L 1.00 ELEM VI $38,619.00 01 MIMS, SANDRA J 1.00 4YROLD $41 ,051.00 01 MURPI I, KA TIE F 1.00 KINDER-REG $31 ,285.00 01 NEAL, LINDA K 1.00 ELEM  $24,558.00 01 PETilJS, IDA M 1.00 ELEMVI $37,221.00 01 ROSE, SARA G 1.00 ELEMIII $28,367.00 01 SABO, DEBBIE L 1.00 KINDER-REG $33 ,169.00 01 SHANKS, BETH L 1.00 ELEMV $33,473.00 01 SIMPSON, KIMBERLY D 1.00 ELEM! $21 ,883.00 01 WELLS, JEANNIE L 1.00 ELEM II $33,473.00 01 WILLIAMS, ERMA J 1.00 ELEM IV $29,420.00 01 WILLIAMS, FLORA V 1.00 ELEM III $30,798.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 22.00 $668,861.42 GUIDANCE 01 BALMAZ, BETTYE M 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $34,263.00 01 SMITI-I, ALMA F 1.00 CNSLR-ELEM $33,979.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $68,242.00 LIB/AV. 01 CRAVEN, ERNESTINE C 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $37,961.49 CATEC.ORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,961.49 OTHER PROF. 02 APPLEWI IITE, ELIZABETH H 0.80 NURSE $14,523.52 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.80 $14,523.52 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 BROWN, KATHLEEN M 0.20 SPE-VISUAL $7,561.80 01 HICKS, KATHLEEN F 1.00 SPE-LD $39,936.00 01 JOHNSON, BRENDA F 1.00 SPE-LD $32,4 I 9.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.20 $79,916.80 PRIN Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"l:'\\\\'- T'!.\\'Ort doc not ,nc\\ude, Met.-o{'ol\u0026gt;tan Schoo\\, and A.\\te.-nati.ve Lea.-ninv, Cente.- and is based on a\\\\ funds and a\\\\ em1lloyees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 01 PRESLAR, OTIS M CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC.CLSRM. TCH. SERV.WKRS. TCHR.AIDES OJ OJ 01 06 06 06 06 06 06 01 01 01 01 01 BAILEY, JACK H BANKS, RICKEY D BEDOW, LAURA M BURGIN, JOHNS BURGIN, JOHN S GERSHNER, VICKI M GERSHNER, VICKI M HICKS, BARBARA A HICKS, BARBARA A JOHNSON, MARILYN F LOVE, VICKI L MA lLOCK, NANCY S MCILROY, JILL M POTEET, LISA B CATEGORY TOTALS: 02 DRANE, WALTER II 02 MORGAN, LULA 02 POSITION, VACANT 02 SMITH, RUFUS JO SWIFf, ETHEL LEE CATEGORY TOTALS: 02 CHRISTIANSON, ALICE 02 CUNNINGS, GEORGIA L 02 DALE, SUSAN M 02 ESTRADA,ELVIA 02 FIELDS, LEOLA H JO GRAY, ALICE REDDEN 02 HARDIN, ELLAN M 10 HOOD, KA YE Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 10.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 4.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JOB CODE ELE PRIN PE SPEC MUSIC SPE-M/RET READING READING READING READING MATH-CHP I MATH-Cf-IP I SPE-N/CATG SPE-M/RET G\u0026amp;T SPEC ED SPEECH CUSTODAN CUSTODAN CUS-PffiME CUST-HEAD CUSTODAN AIDE-REGLR AIDE-4YR AIDE-REGLR AIDE-SVA LAB ATTEND AIDE-SVA AIDE-SVA AIDE-SVA SALARY $60,683.52 $60,683.52 $17,956.20 $27,556.00 $35,600.00 $10,127.10 $10,127.10 $19,015.50 $19,015.50 $16,331.00 $16,331.00 $29,177.00 $34,526.00 $31,041.00 $26,113.60 $292,917.00 $14,096.50 $10,863.00 $17,798.20 $8,523.00 $51,280.70 $8,816.00 $10,663.00 $10,663.00 $4,387.70 $10,663.00 $5,108.60 $3,065.16 $5,991.48 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends{does not include benefits) 61 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 MARTS, GLENDA RAE 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,387.70 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 AIDE-SVA 02 RENFRO, SHARON 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 SCALES, K.ECIS D 1.00 AIDE-SVA $4,387.70 02 THOMAS, MA l11E M 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 TIDWELL, CATIIY V 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 WATKINS, RENEE L 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 02 WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $10,663.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 16.00 S 121,448.34 YEARLY TOTALS: 63.50 $1,492,186.68 94 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 376.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 HIGGINS, NETTIE 1.00 SEC PRIN $17,194.65 02 PHILLIPS, PENNY D 0.40 MEDIA CL $5,372.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $22,567.05 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BETTON, SHERRI L 1.00 KINDER-REG $20,074.00 01 BUETTNER, SALLY G 1.00 KINDER-REG $24,892.00 01 ELLIS, EDDIE M 1.00 ELEMV $36,876.00 01 EPPERSON, BECKY J 1.00 KINDER-REG $30,753.00 01 HALL, DONNA R 1.00 ELEM VI $33,664.00 01 KLING, ALISA D 1.00 ELEMil $20,074.00 01 MCCARTHER,GERALDINE 1.00 ELEMV $33,142.00 01 MCCLAIN, MARION K 1.00 ELEM! $24,029.00 01 MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M 1.00 ELEM II $32,339.00 01 MILLER, GLORIA K 1.00 4 YR OLD $30,452.00 01 PENNY, JACQUELINE F 1.00 ELEMVI $25,695.00 01 ROLAX, SHIRLEY A 1.00 4 YR OLD $40,670.00 01 SIMPSON, ANGIE M 1.00 4 YR OLD $30,753.00 01 SMJTH, ARBRADELLA B 1.00 ELEM III $29,930.00 01 SNOWDEN, SALLIE R 1.00 ELEMI $28,043.00 01 STUART, DOROTI-IY J 1.00 ELEM! $28,344.00 01 TRIPCONY, WALDA D 1.00 ELEM IV $28,344.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. 'l:h, ..-e,,ort does no\\ ,ndude, Met..-o\\\\o\\i\\an Sehoo\\, and A\\terna\\ive Learninv. Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on llayroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CA TECORY FUND EMPLOYEE 0 I VANECKO, ALICE F 0 I WILSON, SANDRA D CATEGORY TOTALS: GUIDANCE 0 I MOSBY, LORRAINE L CATEGORY TOTALS: LIB/AV. 0 I NORMAN, CHERRY G CA TE GORY TOTALS: OTHER PROF. 02 CURRY, JOANN CATEGORY TOTALS: OTHR CLSRM. TCR 0 I WATERS, DORIS Z CATEGORY TOTALS: PRIN 01 FIELDS, FREDERICK L CATEGORY TOTALS: SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 06 CRAWFORD, CARMELIA A CUNNINGHAM, ELLEN S FLANAGAN, VETA SERV.WKRS. TCHR.AIDES 01 06 01 06 01 LEIGH, MARGARET A NAGEL, DlANA K SIMS, SIIlRLEY C CATEGORY TOTALS: 02 DEDMON, NANCY A 02 HOBBS, BARBARA A 02 WILLIAMS, JEFFERY CATEGORY TOTALS: 02 CRISS, PAULINE W 02 DRIVER, OCIE A 02 GREGORY, NEA C Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. FTE 1.00 1.00 19.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.50 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 3.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JOB CODE ELEM Ill ELEM rv CNS LR-ELEM LIBRN-ELEM NURSE SPE-LD ELE PRIN MATH SPEC SPEECH READING G\u0026amp;TSPCLST MA TI-1-CHP I MUSIC CUSTODAN CUST-HEAD CUSTODAN AIDE-4YR AIDE-4YR AIDE-SVA SALARY $32, 118.00 $530,192.00 $36,876.00 $36,876.00 $30,729.95 $30,729.95 $9,635.60 $9,635.60 $29,649.00 $29,649.00 $40,815.43 $40,815.43 $3, 179.70 $17,635.00 $17,864.47 $25,9 16.00 $26,498.00 $91,093.17 $8,891.00 $17,260.60 $7,976.20 $34,127.80 $10,411.00 $10,411.00 $6,507.60 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 63 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 lllLL, DARLENE 0.40 LAB ATTEND $3,526.40 02 JACKSON, BENNIE 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $8,396.00 02 LANGSTON, CALVIN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $5,790.40 02 MCCLINA, MARY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,101.60 02 RAND, ALICE C 0.20 LAB ATTEND $2,082.20 02 SANDERS, NORMA J 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 SO LEE, DEBORAH L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,959.60 CATEGORY TOTALS: 8.60 $72,596.80 YEARLY TOTALS: 40.00 $898,282.80 95 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 405.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 PlllLLIPS, PENNY D 1.00 SEC PRIN $1,125.32 02 POSITION,VACANT 0.40 MEDIA CL CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $1,125.32 ELEM. CLSRM. TCH. 01 BETTON, SHERRI L 1.00 KINDER-REG $21,072.00 01 BUETTNER, SALLY G 1.00 KINDER-REG $25,935 .00 01 CARTER, CHARLES R 1.00 ELEM III $27,799.00 01 ELLIS, EDDIE M 1.00 ELEMV $37,221.00 01 EPPERSON, BECKY J 1.00 KINDER-REG $31,852.00 01 HALL, DONNA R 1.00 ELEMVI $34,790.00 01 JOHNSON, DEBRA J 1.00 ELEM II $27,799.00 01 LA YER, MARSHA A 1.00 4 YR OLD $21,072.00 01 MCCARTHER,GERALDlNE 1.00 ELEMV $34,263.00 01 MCCLAIN, MARION K 1.00 ELEM I $25,064.00 01 MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M 1.00 ELEM II $33,453 .00 01 MILLER, GLORIA K 1.00 4 YR OLD $31,548.00 01 PENNY, JACQUELINE F 1.00 ELEMVI $26,746.00 01 ROLAX, SHIRLEY A 1.00 4YROLD $41,051.00 01 SNOWDEN, SALLIE R 1.00 ELEM I $29,117.00 01 STUART, DOROTHY J 1.00 ELEM I $29,420.00 01 TRIPCONY, W ALDA D 1.00 ELEM IV $14,403.54 01 VANECKO, ALICE F 1.00 ELEMIII $32,419.00 Note: Emp\\oyees with no sa\\ary are not currently active on payro\\l. '\"'\" Te\\\\Ort does. not ,n\u0026lt;:.\\u\u0026lt;le, Me\\TO\\)O\\itan Sc\"oo\\, an\u0026lt;l A\\ternative \\...earning Center and is based on al\\ funds and al\\ employees currently active on payroll. FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 WILSON, SANDRA D 1.00 ELEM IV $21,883.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 19.00 $546,907.54 GUIDANCE 01 MOSBY, LORRAINE L 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $37,221.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $37,221.00 LIB/AV. 01 NORMAN, CHERRY G 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $31,849.36 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $31,849.36 OTHER PROF. 02 CURRY, JOANN 0.40 NURSE $9,956.80 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $9,956.80 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 PACE, KATIE L 1.00 SPE-LD $39,126.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $39,126.00 PRIN 01 FIELDS, FREDERICK L 1.00 ELE PRIN $42,149.05 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $42,149.05 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 CUNNINGHAM, ELLEN S 0.60 SPEECH $21,846.60 06 FLANAGAN, VETA 0.60 READING $18,515.66 06 KOVACH, LILLIAN R 0.10 MATH SPEC $3,345.30 01 LEIGH, MARGARET A 1.00 G\u0026amp;TSPCLST $26,969.00 01 SIMS, SlllRLEY C 1.00 MUSIC $27,556.00 06 WROTEN, MYRTHENE R 0.50 MATII-CHP I $16,452.50 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.80 $114,685.06 SERV.WKRS. 02 ABERNATIIY, RAYMOND 1.00 CUSTODAN $6,948.10 02 DEDMON, NANCY A 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,229.00 02 HOBBS, BARBARA A 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,260.60 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.00 $33,437.70 TCHR.AIDES 02 CRISS, PAULINE W 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,411.00 02 GRAYES, CURTIS G 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $8,835.97 02 GREGORY, NEA C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,875.25 02 HILL, DARLENE 0.40 LAB ATTEND $3,694.40 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 65 ,. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 JACKSON, BENNIE 1.00 AIDE-4YR $8,816.00 02 LANGSTON, CAL VIN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,142.78 02 MCCUNA, MARY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,489.35 02 RAND, ALICE C 0.20 LAB ATTEND $2,082.20 02 SANDERS, NORMA J 1.00 AIDE-4YR $9,285.49 02 SOLEE, DEBORAH L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $8,050.05 02 WILSON, RHONDA RUTI-1 0.50 AIDE-SVA $1,673.20 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.10 $73,355.69 YEARLY TOTALS: 40.70 $929,813.52 96 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 453.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 PHILLIPS, PENNY D 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,719.88 02 SMITH, CLAUDIA 0.40 MEDIA CL $4,185.59 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.40 $19,905.47 ELEM.CLSRM. TCH. 01 BETTON, SHERRI L 1.00 ELEM II $21,883.00 01 BUETTNER, SALLY G 1.00 4 YR OLD $26,746.00 01 COKELEY, GWENDOLYN D 1.00 ELEM VI $33,453.00 01 DUDECK, DJUNA C. 1.00 ELEM I $23,504.00 01 ELLIS, EDDIE M 1.00 ELEMV $38,031.00 01 EPPERSON, BECKY J 1.00 KINDER-REG $32,662.00 01 JOHNSON, DEBRA J 1.00 ELEM II $28,610.00 01 MCCARlHER, GERALDINE 1.00 ELEMV $35,074.00 01 MCCLAIN, MARION K 1.00 4 YR OLD $26,969.00 01 MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M 1.00 ELEM VI $34,263.00 01 MILLER, GLORIA K 1.00 KINDER-REG $32,358.00 01 PENNY, JACQUELINE F 1.00 ELEM II $27,556.00 01 ROGERS, CHARLENE I 1.00 ELEM I $39,936.00 01 ROLAX, SHIRLEY A 1.00 4 YR OLD $41,861.00 01 SHUFFIELD, KELLY L 1.00 KINDER-REG $29,117.00 01 SNOWDEN, SALLIE R 1.00 ELEM I $29,927.00 01 STUART, DOROTIIY J 1.00 ELEM III $30,231.00 01 TRIPCONY, WALDA D 1.00 ELEM IV $30,231.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan .. School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll . , ~ ~ ,~ c-..a.._ 1'\"\"'C,c-..~ ~ '1t.v,c-v. ~ 'P\"'(' ~._, __ - - n-..,c- c:..-,-- -+ C:..'t\\vu.,.,,,,..,(,\\n,, ... ,,nt. \\..,.c-,,,,,,. ,.,,, . .,,,.nt ...\" \\ YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 01 VANECKO, ALICE F 1.00 ELEM IIl $33,229.00 01 WILSON, SANDRA D 1.00 ELEM IV $22,693.00 OJ WINE, KIMBERLY ANN 1.00 KINDER-REG $20,262.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 21.00 $638,596.00 GUIDANCE 01 JAMES, SANDRA S 0.50 CNSLR-ELEM $13,748.00 01 MOSBY, LORRAINE L 1.00 CNS LR-ELEM $38,031.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: I.SO $51,779.00 LIB/AV. OJ NORMAN, CHERRY G 1.00 LIBRN-ELEM $32,681.48 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.00 $32,681.48 OTHER PROF. 02 CURRY, JOANN 0.40 NURSE $10,374.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $10,374.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 PACE, KATIE L 1.00 SPE-LD $39,936.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $39,936.00 PRlN 01 FIELDS, FREDERICK L 1.00 ELE PRIN $43,239.62 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $43,239.62 SEC. CLSRM. TCH. 01 BROWN: ADRIENNE 0.30 SPEECH $10,437.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KATHRYN D 0.50 READING $15,774.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KATIIRYN D 0.50 READING $15,774.00 06 DANESHMANDI, KATHRYN D 0.50 MATI-1-CIIP I $15,774.00 01 DOCKETT-WILSON, TAMMI Y 1.00 MUSIC $26,746.00 01 LEIGH, MARGARET A 1.00 G\u0026amp;TSPCLST $27,779.0~ 06 SEBOURN, KAREN L 0.60 MATH SPEC $16,679.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4.40 $128,963.40 SERV.WKRS. 02 DEDMON, NANCY A 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,539.00 02 HOBBS, BARBARA A 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,740.60 02 JOHNSON,SYLVESTER 1.00 CUSTODAN $7,129.57 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 3.00 $34,409.17 TCHR.AIDES Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD lNFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Stipends(does not include benefits) 67 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY 02 CRISS, PAULINE W 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 02 DOSS, TIMMY F 1.00 AIDE-REGLR $9,907.00 02 FEE, STEPHANIE A 0.50 AIDE-SVA $1 ,673.20 02 GREGORY, NEA C 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,182.30 02 1-IlLL, DARLENE 0.60 LAB ATTEND $5,793.00 02 JONES, TIFFANI R 1.00 AIDE-4YR $5,271.11 02 LANGSTON, CALVIN 1.00 AIDE-SVA $6,416.90 02 MCCLINA, MARY 1.00 AIDE-SVA $7,662 .90 02 SANDERS, NORMA J 1.00 AIDE-4YR $10,663.00 02 SO LEE, DEBO RAJ I L 1.00 AIDE-SVA $8,236.95 CATEGORY TOTALS: 9.10 $73,469.36 YEARLY TOTALS: 43.80 $1,073,353.50 94 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 647.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 DUERR, DONNA P 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $37,540.00 01 PATTERSON, DAVID H 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $42,711.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $80,251.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 ENOCH, LYDIA L 1.00 REG $19,481.62 02 MARTINEK, DARLENE B 1.00 SEC PRIN $15,719.88 02 RELFORD, YOLANDA L 0.60 MEDIA CL $8,058.60 02 WASHINGTON, ESTHER M 1.00 SECATT $17,194.65 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.60 $60,454.75 GUIDANCE 01 GOLDSBY, LA VERNE G 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $41,791.36 01 JONES, JACK A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $41 ,250.121 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $83,041.50 LIB/AV. 01 ABLES, FRANCES M 1.00 LIBRN-JR $41,729.11 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $41,729.11 OTHER PROF. 02 BAILEY, JOHNNY 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,473.00 02 COGSHELL, CARL L 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. -Y\\\u0026gt;\\ Tc\"'art \\.\\t,e.\" na\\ \\nc\\ude., Me\\ro{',,\\itan Sc.boo\\., and A.\\tel\"native \\....earnin1!. Center and is based on all funds and all em11loyees currently active on 11ayroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE 02 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 PRIN CURRY, JOANN CATEGORY TOTALS: BULLOCK, PATRICIA A CATEGORY TOTALS: 0 I BRADFORD, GAYLE B SEC.CLSRM. TCH. 01 01 01 01 01 01 06 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 06 01 01 01 01 01 01 CATEGORY TOTALS: ANDRESS, WILLIAM S ANDRUS, GEORGE C BENSON, JESSIE J BEST, CHARLOTTE V BRAGG, ALLEN R BURNETTE, DENNIS R CAPOOT, MICHAEL G CAPOOT, MICHAEL G CHAMBERS, ANIBONY D CRIPPS, JOSEPH D CRISWELL, DONICA M DAVIDSON, KATHY L DA VIS, MARCUS D DA VIS, PHYLESIA DOSS, GAILP EARLEYWINE, SONY A G ESTES, WILLIAM E GAINES, SARA E GILBERT-WISE, M BARBARA GULLETT-SHELNUTT, TAMARA J HAMILTON, ORALYN S HARRIS, ANNlTilA J HARRIS, SHARON D HAWKING, NANCY G HUNT, SAMUEL Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. ITE 0.60 2.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 JOB CODE NURSE SPE-LD SEC PRIN SOC STU ART MATII MATII LIFE SCI ENGLSII-REG MA TI-I-Cl-IP I MATI-I EXPITE BAND SPE-N/CATG LNGFNDS B/GPE MATII SPE-N/CATG ENGLSH-REG CIVICS MATII READlNG ENGLSH-REG LNGFNDS HOME ECO ISSP PHY SCI MATH SALARY $14,453.40 $37,720.40 $31,255.00 $31,255.00 $60,762.00 $60,762.00 $28,043.00 $29,649.00 $23,527.00 $24,832.00 $21 ,680.00 $4,336 .00 $29,260.40 $] 1,550.80 $22,483.00 $24,286.00 $28,943.00 $28,398.00 $33,913.00 $27,441.00 $23,233.00 $34,748.00 $27,622.00 $25,695.00 $39,527.09 $29,201.00 $27,823.00 $30,660.00 This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 69 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 0l JOHNSON, JOHN C 1.00 B/GPE $32,842.00 0l JONES, GWENDOLYN DIANN 1.00 PHY SCI 06 KINSEY, TERRY D 1.00 READING $28,043.00 0l KIRCHNER, LESSIE A 1.00 LIFE SCI $21,680.00 0l LAMB, CAROLYN F 1.00 B/GPE 01 LOVELACE, DOROTIN J 0.40 VOCCOR 0l MAYBERRY, BONNIE B 1.00 VOCCOR $40,384.41 0l MCFADDEN, CHARLES 1.00 LNGFNDS $22,483.00 01 MCKENNA, JULIANN E 1.00 ART 01 MILLIGAN, JENNIFER H 1.00 ERTHSCI $28,585.00 01 MITCHELL, SANDRA A 0.20 SPEECH $6,307.20 01 MOHUNDRO, THOMAS S 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $26,437.00 01 MOSELEY, FRAN N 1.00 SOC STIJ 01 NIEDERBRACH, JAY A 1.00 VOC/MUSIC $25,695.00 01 OSHIRO, NIDIA 1.00 SPANISH $20,074.00 01 PARKER, PA TT! J 1.00 voe BUS ED 06 PIKE, PERRY R 1.00 MATH-CHP I $25,133.00 0l POORE', PATRICIA A 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $24,089.00 06 POSITION,OPEN 1.00 COMP ST 01 RALEY, BEVERLY A 1.00 SPE-M/RET $40,670.00 01 RUSH, LA WREN CE R 1.00 CIVICS 0l SAMONS, KATHRYN M 1.00 LNGFNDS $21,680.00 01 SEAWOOD, GREGORY E 1.00 AM HIST 01 SIMON, THERESA L 0.60 FRENCH $16,862.40 01 SMITH, SUSAN M 1.00 ERTHSCI 01 STARLING, LILLIAN L 1.00 HEALTH $38,763 .00 01 TOMLINSON, E. LIANNE 1.00 COMP LIT $25,540.23 06 VAN PELT, SHARON E 1.00 READING $28,846.00 0l WARREN, JUDITH L 1.00 AMHIST $28,292.00 01 WEBB, THOMAS C 1.00 MAUI 06 WICKLIFFE, ALICE E 1.00 READING $33,664.00 01 WOLFE, CAROLYN S 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $31,255 .00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 53.80 $1,144,176.53 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. \"\\\"h,s Te.\\'ort doe.snot inc\\ude., Me.tro\\'o\\itan Schoo\\, and Ac\\ternative Learnin1?, Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll . .. -  - SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY SERV.WKRS. 02 FISHER, KENNETT-I L 1.00 BLDG ENG $22,598.00 02 GREENE,GREGORY 1.00 CUSTODAN $2,446.39 02 LEAKS, AL VESTER 1.00 A-HEADCUS $13,360.00 02 POSITION, VACANT 0.50 CUS-PffiME 02 SIMPSON, MJTCIIELL 0.50 CUS-PffiME $2,307.25 02 WASHINGTON, DWIGHT B 1.00 CUST-IIEAD $16,934.20 02 WILLIAMS, HENRY L 0.50 CUSTODAN $3,633.50 02 WILLIAMS, SYLVIA 1.00 CUSTODAN CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.50 $61,279.34 TCHR.AIDES 02 WILLIAMS, BRUCE B 0.40 LAB ATTEND $4,164.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $4,164.40 YEARLY TOTALS: 73.90 $1,604,834.03 95 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 635.00 ASST.PRIN-NT 01 DUERR, DONNA P 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $38,814.00 01 PATTERSON, DAVID H 1.00 A/PRIN SEC $44,017.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $82,831.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 AKBAR, FATIMAH K 0.60 MEDIA CL $6,026.07 02 ENOCH, LYDIA L 1.00 REG $20,037.35 02 JACKSON, ERMA JEAN 1.00 SEC PRIN $13,687.96 02 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 SECATT CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.60 $39,751.38 GUIDANCE 01 GOLDSBY, LA VERNE G 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $42,182.72 01 JONES, JACK A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $42,510.47 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $84,693.19 LIB/AV. 01 ABLES, FRANCES M 1.00 LIBRN-JR $42,120.04 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $42,120.04 OTHER PROF. 02 CURRY, JOANN 0.60 NURSE $14,935.20 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD lNFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary= Base Salary+ Sti1\u0026gt;ends(does not include benefits) 71 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY 02 MARTIN,DUNCANERAC 1.00 S/8 SOFR $10,833.00 02 MCTIER, JR., DONALD 1.00 SIB SOFR $11,794.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.60 $37,562.20 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 BULLOCK, PATRICIA A 1.00 SPE-LD $32,358.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $32,358.00 PRIN 01 MASON, CASSANDRA N 1.00 SEC PRIN $52,526.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $52,526.00 SEC.CLSRM TCH. 01 ALLEN,CLARENCE 1.00 AM HIST $26,746.00 01 ANDRESS, WILLIAM S 1.00 SOC STU $26,685.00 01 ANDRUS, GEORGE C 1.00 ART 01 BENSON, JESSIE J 1.00 MATI-1 $30,737.00 01 BOSTIC, KELVIN 1.00 MATI-1 $25,296.80 01 BRIDGFORTI-1, MARY CATI-IERINE 1.00 SOC STU $23,199.00 01 BURNETTE, DENNIS R 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $26,305.00 01 CRISWELL, DONICA M 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $23,504.00 01 DAVIDSON, KATI-TYL 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $25,314.00 01 DA VIS, MARCUS D 1.00 B/GPE $31,133.00 01 DOSS, GAILP 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $29,456.00 01 GAINES, SARA E 1.00 MATTI 01 GARDNER, ANN BEENE 1.00 LNGFNDS 01 GULLE1T-SHELNUTT, TAMARA J 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $25,935.00 01 HAMIL TON, ORAL YN S 1.00 LNGFNDS $26,746.00 01 HARRIS, ANNITI-IA J 1.00 HOME ECO $36,968.88 01 HARRIS, SHARON D 1.00 ISSP $30,840.00 01 HUNT, SAMUEL 1.00 MATTI $30,798.00 01 JEFFERS, MICHAEL A 1.00 PHY SCI $21,072.00 01 JONES, XERLO1T A L 1.00 VOCCOR $22,675.04 06 KINSEY, TERRY D 1.00 READING $29,117.00 01 KIRCHNER, LESSIE A 1.00 LIFE SCI $22,693.00 01 LAMB, CAROLYN F 1.00 B/GPE $36,030.00 01 MCFADDEN, CHARLES 1.00 LNGFNDS $23,504.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. 'l:h,, '\u0026lt;C.\\\"Ort doe\" no\\ \\nc\\ude, Me\\To\\,o\\i\\an Sc.boo\\, and A\\\\e'\u0026lt;native \\..,c.arnin\\?, Center and is based on a\\\\ funds and a\\\\ employees currently active on payroll. CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY --------- 01 MJTCIIELL, SANDRA A 0.20 SPEECH $6,528.40 01 MOGSTAD, BONNIE L 1.00 ART $25,875.00 01 NESMIIB, ESTELLA 1.00 MAIB-CIIP I $21,883.00 01 NIEDERBRACH, IA YA 1.00 VOC/MUSIC $26,746.00 01 OSHIRO, NIDIA 1.00 SPANISH $21,072.00 01 POORE', PATRJCIA A 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $25,125.00 01 POSillON,VACANT 1.00 MATI-I 01 POSillON, VACANT 1.00 EXPITE 01 RALEY, BEVERLY A 1.00 SPE-M/RET $41,051.00 01 REEDY, JAMIE LYNN 1.00 MATII $20,262.00 01 RHODES, BERNESTINE 1.00 voe BUS ED $26,476.59 01 RUSH, LA WREN CE R 1.00 CIVICS $24,278.95 01 RUSSELL, ANIBONY D 1.00 ERIBSCI $20,835.00 01 SAMONS, KA 11-IRYN M 1.00 ENGLSII-REG $22,693.00 01 SIMON, 11-IERESA L 0.40 FRENCH $9,604.10 01 SKIDGEL, RONNY L 1.00 MAIB $31,017.00 01 SMITH, SUSAN M 1.00 ERTHSCI $29,928.00 01 STARLING, LILLIAN L 1.00 HEALTH $39,126.00 01 TAYLOR, TRAVIS F 0.60 BAND $14,019.00 01 TOMLINSON, E. LIANNE 1.00 COMP LIT $26,610.39 06 VAN PELT, SHARON E 1.00 READING $29,927.00 01 WARREN, JUDIIB L 1.00 CIVICS $29,360.00 06 WICKLIFFE, ALICE E 1.00 READING $35,540.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 4S.20 $1,102,712. IS SERV.WKRS. 02 FELLS, CORINTI-IIS 1.00 CUSTODAN $9,595.9! 02 FISHER, KENNETI I L 1.00 BLDG ENG $23,270.00 02 GREENE, GREGORY 1.00 CUSTODAN $11,078.00 02 JONES, Cl IRIS L 0.50 CUS-PffiME $935.76 02 JONES, JAMES L 0.50 CUS-PffiME $946.90 02 LEAKS, AL VESTER 1.00 A-HEADCUS $13,919.80 02 WASHINGTON, DWIGHT 8 1.00 CUST-HEAD $17,375.80 02 WILLIAMS, HENRY L 0.50 CUSTODAN $3,633.50 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. This report does not include, Metropolitan School, and Alternative Learning Center and is based on all funds and all employees currently active on payroll. LRSD INFORMATION SERVICE DEPT. Salary = Base Salary + Stipends(does not include benefits) 73 YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FfE JOB CODE SALARY CATEGORY TOTALS: 6.50 $80,755.68 TCHR.AIDES 02 WILLIAMS, BRUCE B 0.40 LAB ATTEND $4,164.40 CATEGORY TOTALS: 0.40 $4,164.40 YEARLY TOTALS: 65.30 $1,559,474.04 96 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 637.00 ASST. PRIN-NT 01 PATTERSON, DAVID H 1.00 A/PRTN SEC $45,058.00 01 POSITION, VACANT 1.00 A/PRTN SEC CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $45,058.00 CLERC/SEC'Y. 02 AKBAR, FATIMAH K 0.60 MEDIA CL $7,097.26 02 CROWDER, CLEDA C 1.00 BK/SEC $17,194.65 02 ENOCH, LYDIA L 1.00 REG $20,594.32 02 HERVEY, SCHARLOTIE A 1.00 SECATI $13,755.72 CATEGORY TOTALS: 3.60 $58,641.95 GUIDANCE 01 GOLDSBY, LAVERNE G 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $43,056.00 01 JONES, JACK A 1.00 CNSLR-SECD $43,383.75 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.00 $86,439.75 LIB/AV. 01 ABLES, FRANCES M 1.00 LIBRN-JR $42,951.13 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $42,951.13 OTHER PROF. 02 CURRY, JOANN 0.60 NURSE $ I 5,561.00 02 MARTIN, DUNCAN ERAC 1.00 SIB SOFR $11 ,153.00 02 MClYER, JR., DONALD 1.00 SIB SOFR $12,143.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 2.60 $38,857.00 OTHR CLSRM. TCH. 01 BULLOCK, PATRICIA A 1.00 SPE-LD $33,169.00 CA TE GORY TOTALS: 1.00 $33,169.00 PRIN 01 MASON, CASSANDRA N 1.00 SEC PRTN $53,698.00 CATEGORY TOTALS: 1.00 $53,698.00 Note: Employees with no salary are not currently active on payroll. '\"l:'- '\"\"-\\'\u0026lt;\u0026gt;rt\"\"'\"' not \\ndude, Met.-o\\'o\\itan Schoo\\, and A\\te.-naUve \\..earnin\\?. Center and i,i based on a\\\\ funds and a\\\\ employees currently active on payroll. YEAR SITE STUDENTS CATEGORY FUND EMPLOYEE FTE JOB CODE SALARY SEC.CLSRM. TCH. OJ ALLEN, CLARENCE 1.00 AM HIST $27,556.00 01 ANDRESS, WILLIAM S 1.00 SOC STU $27,496.00 OJ BENNETT,A 1.00 LIFE SCI $36,127.00 01 BENSON, JESSIE J 1.00 MATH $26,947.25 01 BOSTIC, KELVIN 1.00 VOCCOR $27,409.67 01 BURNETTE, DENNIS R 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $26,685.00 01 CAMPANALI, JON M 1.00 LIFE SCI $21 ,316.00 01 CHAMBERS, ANTHONY D 1.00 EXPITE $31 ,943.78 01 COVERT, MARY JO 1.00 ENGLSH-REG $23,443.00 01 CRISWELL, DONICA M 0.50 SPE-N/CATG $12,157.00 01 DA VIS, MARCUS D 1.00 B/GPE $31 ,370.00 01 DOSS, GAILP 1.00 SPE-N/CATG $30,267.00 01 EURE, ANNAC 1.00 ART $20,262.00 01 GATELY, LAURA S. 1.00 MATH $25,064.00 01 GULL\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":270,"next_page":271,"prev_page":269,"total_pages":3369,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":3228,"total_count":40428,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":307},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":37},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":34},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":23},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"worksheets","hits":5},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":4},{"value":"study guides","hits":4},{"value":"learning modules","hits":3},{"value":"slide shows","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"Sound","hits":1050},{"value":"StillImage","hits":803},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":213},{"value":"Collection","hits":10},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2076},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":1425},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":777},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":464},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":397},{"value":"AFL-CIO. Civil Rights Department","hits":326},{"value":"Hunter, Charles N., approximately 1851-1931","hits":323},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":244}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Race relations","hits":4661},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":3223},{"value":"People--Ethnic Groups--Hispanics","hits":2928},{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":2321},{"value":"African Americans","hits":1792},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1747},{"value":"Civil rights--South Carolina","hits":1739},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Mississippi","hits":1550},{"value":"League of United Latin American Citizens","hits":1531},{"value":"LULAC","hits":1517},{"value":"Race","hits":1483}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1501},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1413},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":713},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":639},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":623},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":582},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":582},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":418}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2592},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1497},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":622},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":579},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":360},{"value":"De Laine, Joseph A. (Joseph Armstrong), 1898-1974","hits":345},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":315},{"value":"Samet, Seymour, 1919-2014","hits":279}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1567},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":663},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":386},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":299},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":188},{"value":"Birmingham Bombing (Sixteenth Street Baptist Church)","hits":125},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":104},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":83},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":68},{"value":"Brown versus Board of Education","hits":55},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":43}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":10939},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4304},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":3804},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":3648},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2519},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2032},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1863},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":1801},{"value":"United States, Texas, Harris County, Houston, 29.76328, -95.36327","hits":1564},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":1236},{"value":"United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729","hits":1198}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"South Carolina","hits":6466},{"value":"Georgia","hits":5551},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":3826},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":3452},{"value":"Texas","hits":3432},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":2359},{"value":"Alabama","hits":2352},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1657},{"value":"New York","hits":1561},{"value":"Florida","hits":1185},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":1167}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1962","hits":5885},{"value":"1964","hits":5684},{"value":"1963","hits":5401},{"value":"1965","hits":5249},{"value":"1966","hits":5016},{"value":"1961","hits":4941},{"value":"1968","hits":4914},{"value":"1967","hits":4901},{"value":"1969","hits":4708},{"value":"1960","hits":4681},{"value":"1957","hits":4182},{"value":"1958","hits":4010},{"value":"1977","hits":3976},{"value":"1959","hits":3971},{"value":"1971","hits":3904},{"value":"1970","hits":3870},{"value":"1976","hits":3790},{"value":"1955","hits":3718},{"value":"1974","hits":3664},{"value":"1972","hits":3650},{"value":"1975","hits":3649},{"value":"1956","hits":3611},{"value":"1973","hits":3461},{"value":"1994","hits":3357},{"value":"1995","hits":3332},{"value":"1950","hits":3315},{"value":"1978","hits":3266},{"value":"1954","hits":3261},{"value":"1979","hits":3249},{"value":"1996","hits":3225},{"value":"1980","hits":3158},{"value":"1948","hits":3126},{"value":"1953","hits":3050},{"value":"1997","hits":3036},{"value":"1949","hits":3022},{"value":"1998","hits":2990},{"value":"1999","hits":2983},{"value":"1952","hits":2967},{"value":"1947","hits":2958},{"value":"1951","hits":2907},{"value":"1981","hits":2856},{"value":"2000","hits":2833},{"value":"2001","hits":2792},{"value":"2002","hits":2693},{"value":"1982","hits":2691},{"value":"1946","hits":2690},{"value":"2003","hits":2675},{"value":"1983","hits":2652},{"value":"1945","hits":2610},{"value":"1985","hits":2584},{"value":"1943","hits":2578},{"value":"1944","hits":2577},{"value":"1984","hits":2573},{"value":"1942","hits":2499},{"value":"1941","hits":2473},{"value":"1940","hits":2447},{"value":"1986","hits":2438},{"value":"1939","hits":2375},{"value":"1930","hits":2352},{"value":"1938","hits":2341},{"value":"1937","hits":2323},{"value":"1936","hits":2303},{"value":"2004","hits":2296},{"value":"2005","hits":2270},{"value":"1931","hits":2252},{"value":"1990","hits":2186},{"value":"1987","hits":2183},{"value":"1991","hits":2181},{"value":"1935","hits":2174},{"value":"2006","hits":2165},{"value":"1934","hits":2161},{"value":"1933","hits":2160},{"value":"1932","hits":2150},{"value":"1992","hits":2139},{"value":"1993","hits":2123},{"value":"1989","hits":1879},{"value":"1929","hits":1874},{"value":"1988","hits":1753},{"value":"1928","hits":1509},{"value":"1921","hits":1393},{"value":"1925","hits":1275},{"value":"1927","hits":1272},{"value":"1926","hits":1266},{"value":"1924","hits":1263},{"value":"1923","hits":1208},{"value":"1922","hits":1188},{"value":"1920","hits":1187},{"value":"2007","hits":1029},{"value":"2011","hits":1029},{"value":"2008","hits":1017},{"value":"2010","hits":992},{"value":"2009","hits":980},{"value":"2012","hits":967},{"value":"2013","hits":965},{"value":"2014","hits":924},{"value":"2016","hits":876},{"value":"1919","hits":850},{"value":"1918","hits":849},{"value":"1900","hits":831},{"value":"2015","hits":826}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":301323,"missing":11},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"correspondence","hits":9610},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4200},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3564},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1925},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1690},{"value":"records (documents)","hits":1429},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":1385},{"value":"reports","hits":1362},{"value":"clippings (information artifacts)","hits":1156},{"value":"articles","hits":903},{"value":"transcripts","hits":816}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":13560},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":9168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8110},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6150},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1673},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":1494},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":40},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/","hits":20},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":12},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-OW-EU/1.0/","hits":2},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3271},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1843},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1717},{"value":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","hits":1696},{"value":"Memphis World","hits":1484},{"value":"James W. Silver Collection","hits":1430},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":1423},{"value":"Integration Correspondence","hits":1420},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":1403}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":3821},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":3419},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3316},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3287},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3250},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2174},{"value":"South Carolina Digital Library","hits":2167},{"value":"University of South Carolina. South Carolina Political Collections","hits":1793},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":1663},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":1641},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":1435}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":40191},{"value":"Collection","hits":237}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":40278},{"value":"true","hits":150}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}