{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"umc_awr_50584","title":"Correspondence and General National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1995","collection_id":"umc_awr","collection_title":"Advancing Workers’ Rights in the American South","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Folder of materials from the \"National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1956-1999\" series from the AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records"],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Labor movement","Civil rights"],"dcterms_title":["Correspondence and General National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1995"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Maryland, College Park. Libraries"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hdl.handle.net/1903.1/50584"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["records (documents)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1603","title":"Court filings concerning magnet school applications, school district project management tools, and Racial Balance Monitoring Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1995-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","School management and organization","Magnet schools"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning magnet school applications, school district project management tools, and Racial Balance Monitoring Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1603"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["40 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_931","title":"Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/931"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nDate: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Behavior Document --------------- Class Period:- ----- Notice#: Teacher: Student: ------ --------------- ---------------- Reason for Behavior Document: [ ] Class tardiness [ ] Excessive talking [ ] Lack of class materials [ ] Sleeping in class [ ] Eating in class [ ] Cutting class Action Taken: [ ] Student conference [ ] Parent conference [ ] Parent contact [ ] Counseling [ ] Disrespect for teachers [ ] Disrespect for students [ ] Improper care of school property [ ] Disobedience to classroom rules [ ] Overdue library book - second notice [ ] Not doing assignments [ ] Other: _______ _ [ ] Privileges denied [ ] Detention hall [ ] Other Parent's signature: _______________________________ _ Student's signature: ______________________________ _ White copy - Parent Canary copy - Principal Pink copy - Teacher 1995-96 B-15 REF: DlS()211? Disciplin.:1ry B~ferral--Sururuary of Suspensions u/201~2 Sui\nPc:ILf\nion::\nfor 1881 - 1992 ' :'3chol\n~- ---SAC--- --HOME--- BOYS. CLOE --TOTAL-- B NB B NB B NB B NB n 1 2 l~C1l~TLllT TTLE f\u0026lt;OC'K HlGH :.\nc 112 62 12 2 29 6 153 7 (J n 1:., Wlli'l'H LITTLE ROCK HIGH SC :\no 1 lUl 15 9 32 ~ 348 119 U'.24 RIDGEf-\u0026lt;OAMDI DDLE SCHOOL 144 117 18 7 23 10 185 134 U2b LAKEWC10M1JI DDLE SCHO(iL 198 33 i:i 4 41 r~ 245 43 020 [\u0026lt;USE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 284 166 12 2ti 8 322 175 0:30 BAl-dNG Ch:OSS CENTER 1 1 031 AMHUYb :LEMENTARSYC HOOL 22 ~i 22 3 032 LAKEWOCiEDL EMENTARYSC HOO 5 1 6 11 1 033 H,lUI-IEl- 'ARK ELEMENTARYSC H 4 [l ,,-, 12 5 03r\u0026gt; :::iEVENTH:3 Thh:ET ELEMENTARY 13 13 037 LYNCHD HIVE ELEMENTARYSC 1 8 ~~ 8 3 038 CENTi\u0026lt;AL b:LEMENTARY 3 10 4 13 4 040 Mi:AJJOWP ARK ELEMENTARYSC 7 2 7 r, ,\u0026lt;. 041 NCRTHH EIGHTS ELEMENTARY 3 1 16 8 19 10 042 r.1-\u0026lt;ESTWC1EuLDh :MENTAl:\u0026lt;SYC HO 3 1 17 1 20 2 043 PARK HILL ELEMENTARYSC HO 9 b 9 8 044 p JKl!: vu:w b:LEMENTAl:\u0026lt;SCYH O 4 1 9 13 1 04t.\u0026gt; BcLWCJ(Jib\":JL b:MENTAHSYC HOOL 3 \"-:,  3 3 046 GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYSC HOO 11 1 11 1 047 f, (J:~ b: CITY ELEMENTARYSC HO 5 21 7 26 7 048 fNDlAN HT LL:~ ELEMENTARYs 2 4 l 6 1 048 l-\u0026lt;EUWCiOELDE MENTARYSC HOOL 8 l 8 l Dl3Tl:\u0026lt;ll:'l' TUTAL.~ 1039 479 96 27 320 87 1455 5~3 EXPULSIONS FOR 1991-92 SCHOOL YEAR SCHOOL GRADE/RACE/SEX OFFENSE Ridgeroad Md. 7 Black/Male wt.:apon Ridgeroad Md. 7 Black/Mi6le weapon Rose City Md. 8 Black/Male weapon l~LRH-East 9 Black/Female weapon NLRH-East 10 Black/Male Prohibited Conc:luct BLK/WHT DISTnICT POLICY 1 0 :E'BJ 0 0 FBM 0 0 FBO 4 0 FBP PROHIBITED CONDUCT DEMONSTRATIONS AND DISORDERLY ACTIVITIES DRUGS AND ALCOHOL WEAPONSA ND DANGEROUSIN STRUMENTS 5 0 Total: 5 INCIDENT# ______ _ NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CALL DATE. ____ _ INC. DATE ______ _ CRIMINAL INCIDENT REPORT CALL TIME. ____ _ I Location or Inc: I Address or Inc: I Phone# CQMPLJJ.STN.lC'tlM.:mr.OiiMA,t{()~QT'W'.2':.c?oNM'.1':.t\n.A::lNet'.Je'/wVtIwC\u0026lt;'l' IM:.~JU\\t\nAn,Q,~f'.\n::t\ny::2Lust Name: I Fint: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I Ml: Address: Address: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I Dl.JSSN: DOD: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: T Race: l Sex: Hair Color: Eyes: Hehtht: Wet: Hair Color: Ens: Hl!t: W2t: Plwsical Descriution: Ph\\'Sical Descriotion: Em1loyee: I I Student: I I Other: I Emnlo,ee I I Student I I Other I SUSPltct'JDUltNb.ANTiiNPORMATlONM.%M@.%t@:SAU'WSMPWEC.t'l'I/ DEJl'ENDAN1JmokMAnoNWl@tH1iH@MLast Name: I First: I MI: Last Name: I First: I MI: Address: Address: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: l DUSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / I Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eyes: Hel2ht: W2t: Hair Color: Eves: H2t: W2t: Phnical Decsrh,tion: Phvsical Descriution: Emulo,ee: I I Student: I I Other: I Emnlovee I I Student I I Other I wrtNtSSffillORMATION%.tii?).:\n.g\nj\u0026lt;.'\n.'.i\u0026amp;i4~(.F.'./?~:~:w:-1~m.f.is2s\n:\nitflfN%F1~O .itMATiON:~.\n:~\nh~L.:J12\n,_::..\n: :\n\n:S\u0026gt;:Last Name: I First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I MI: Address: Address: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I DUSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eyes: I Hel2ht: W2t: Hair Color: Ens: He:t: W2t: Ph:-!sicaDl escri11tion: Phvsical Descrintion: Emulovee: I I Student: I I Other: I Emulovee I I Student I I Other I Make/Model: I Year: Color: License No: Pro1\u0026gt;ert~D amae.e I I Gane Incident I Personal Iniurv I I Tbcft/Robberv I School Pro11erty Dama2e I I Dru2s I Wca11ons Violation I I Other I \\::\n::\n:::::::\n~:(::::=/f:f-t:)A::\n~0~1tC~-\n-~t1~\n.?~:-~\n\\\\?)~~\n.:~rtt?l:Jt)=A.:.~t f~t\\i~::/fb:l~tA~:thtsSY-iO:~F:f-fJ~NitC::Jdl~)lfl~tt~:}::J:t~:.::}::\\.f:~::~-:~::\n:_=.. . . \u0026lt;'''''  w,::g:i\u0026gt;.:::r,-.J.w i:  + w m@+%1.ao111JrtV1\u0026gt;AMAc.:Nvo.tvE.::a@wtwA:\u0026gt;w neYwm,igw@wiI+@::M#\u0026gt;Descri11tlon: Cost: Serial/ID: Police I I Suuerlntendent I I School I I Safctv/Securitv Office I I Other I Form Pre11nred B,: I Date: I Time: WlilTE COPY -NLR POUCE DEPARTMENT PINK COPY - SCHOOL PRJNCIPAL GOLDENROD COPY - STUDENf AFFAIRS omCE INCIDENT# ______ _ NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CALL DATE_. ____ _ INC. DATE_. _____ _ CRIMINAL INCIDENT REPORT CALL TIME._ ____ _ I Location of Inc: I Address of Inc: I Phone# coMPLAtNTMCTJMilNFOaMA'tlQNMIM!MMiW::tOid~/Ml.AMlN!@'t'IfVfWICW'l' IMUWOlU\\fA'rlQN-@d:\\N'\\tMWMMMFiMl\\ Lust Name: First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I MI: Adtlress: AtldreH: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I DUSSN: DOD: / I Race: I Sex: DOB: Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eves: Hei2ht: Wirt: Hair Color: Ph~sical Descriution: Phnical Descriution: Emulovee: I I Student: I I Other: Em11lo1ee I 1 Student l l Other SUSPECT/DJ:PBNDANl\\ffiia'ORMA.TlONiiWA@dMtM.iMSUMSMP#EfaCifT /DEFENfiMtr:mroRMAttoN:MtiM\u0026amp;t%%WMW%Last Name: First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I Ml: Address: Address: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I DUSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / / Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eves: Heleht: Wirt: Hair Color: Eves: Hl!t: Wirt: Ph\\'Sical Decsriution: Phvsical Descrintion: Em11lo1ee: I I Student: I I Other: Emnloyee I T Student I I Other Last Name: First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I Ml: Adtlress: Atltlress: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I DUSSN: DOB: I I I Race: I Sex: DOB: / T Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eves: Heieht: Wl!t: Hair Color: Ens: Het: Wirt: Ph'\\sical Descri11tion: Phvsical Descrintion: Emnlo,ee: I I Student: I I Other: Emnlovee I I Student I I Other    .. i :\n:\u0026lt; s\" 5 t!TP\\ + \u0026gt;TJA hN Y : 'llli'. Make/Model: I Year: Color: License No: . \u0026lt;\u0026lt; , x \n.= ,,,~ . .,v~.n: i\u0026gt;h,\u0026lt;= ~j I' NEIH .. t,1/:?  i +\u0026amp;\u0026lt;\"'  \n,\\\n.\n:,,_:\n::'.:''''''-i~c,:i::~:\"\"~}Pro11ert1D ama2e Gan2I ncident Personal lniurv Thcft/Robberv School Pro11erty Dama2e Drues Weanons Violation Other \" 'Ii ,,,,.,myy, \"'\"\"?-l'KI!'JH,%%\"::1:'==r = rxwvn.,,x. :M'.\",. .. ,.   ,.... mu------\"\"'+nI ,.,.,.,.,.,, :::\ntn:At:\u0026gt;\\ '.\n-:t:'?JIT:7. ....\" ..\". .' , Descrh,tion: Cost: Serial/ID: Police I I Su11erlntendent I I School I I Safetv/Securitv Office I Other Form Pre11nred Bv: I Dnte: I Time: WlUIE COPY -NLR POLICE DEPAIITMENf PINK COPY - SCHOOL PRINCIPAL GOLDENROD COPY - STUDENT AFFAIRS OFFICE INCIDENT# ______ _ NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CRIMINAL INCIDENT REPORT CALL DATE. ____ _ INC. DATE ______ _ CALL TIME. _____ _ I Location of Inc: I Address or Inc: I Phone# COMPI.Al8'l'NIC'tlMfflll'Ot(MA}1y'lrOn:N2\u0026lt;Y'\u0026gt;.YEfW '.'2:c\\o}M PllAlNTNIC'flf.{:tmt()JtMA'l2'lON\\? :?::ES:rnt:\u0026lt;Lust Name: First: I MI: Last Name: ( First: I MI: Address: Addreu: Phone: I DIJSSN: Phone: I DUSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / / Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eyes: Heieht: Wet: Hair Color: Ens: Wet: Phnical Descrintion: Phvsical Descrintion: Emnlovee: I I Student: I I Other: Emnlovee I l Student l l Other SUSPECTIDEFBND.ANtriiNWRMATJON{ii\u0026amp;.M:HWM:!@SUMS\\tP%E%CMT/fDf EJi'ENfiANT'INFORMATION\\WMMNK@WHLast Name: First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I MI: Address: Address: Phone: I DIJSSN: Phone: I DIJSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / / Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eves: Heleht: Wet: Hair Color: Eves: Hl!:t: Wet: Ph~sical Decsrintion: Phvsical Descrintion: Em11lo,ee: I I Student: I I Other: Emnloyee I l Student l l Other WITNESSJN li'OitMATIONMt@\u0026lt;c tt\u0026lt; (j: ':~ EL'.\u0026gt;L':SfW\nrtNESSI NFOIU\\IA'.tlO'N. { 't\u0026gt;\u0026gt; ::ttLt::nnxLttW\u0026lt;\nY Last Name: First: I Ml: Last Name: I First: I Ml: Address: Address: Phone: I DUSSN: Phone: I DIJSSN: DOB: / / I Race: I Sex: DOB: / I Race: I Sex: Hair Color: Eves: Heleht: Wl!:t: Hair Color: Phnical Descri11tion: Phvsical Descriution: I I Student: I I Other: Emnlovee I I Student I I Other E\n:.,.,\n.}S\u0026lt;\n:/A? \\bi,/C{hi .\\ VltntCLI.JNl()R.MA'J'iQN\"',., ,.,,,fr~, \\tt:Le,,,-~ . .. .\n,:..,. ,. ..:.: Make/Model: Color: License No: M  ~ \" )\u0026lt;.wWiX \u0026lt;.:\u0026lt;  / ~  -~ Prouert,D ama2e Gnni!I.n cident Personall niurv Theft/Robberv School Pro1,ertv Damaee Drues Weanons Violation Other Descrintlon: Cost: SeriaVID: Police I I Suuerlntcndent I I School I I Safctv/Sccuritv Office I I Other Form Prei,nred By: I Dnte: 1 Time: WlilTE COPY -NLR POLICE DEPARTMENT PINK COPY - SCHOOL PRINCIPAL GOLDENROD COPY - STIJDENT AFFAIRS OFFICE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT District Suspension Student's Name _________________ Student ID# ____________ _ School ______________ Grade ___ _ Date ---------------- Address of Parent or Guardian: _____________________________ _ Dear ____________ _ Your child has been involved in the following incident: ----------------------- This letter is to infonn you that the following disciplinary action has been taken concerning your child. Beginning ___________ , your child will be assigned to the following program for ____ day(s):      Boys/Girls Club Suspensions for students in grades seven through twelve will be served at the North Little Rock Boys/Girls Club located at 13th and Main Streets directly across the street from the Alternative School. Classes begin at 8:30 a.m. and dismiss at 3:30 p.m. Transportation to the Boys/Girls Club Suspension program is the family's responsibility. Elementary Alternative School Suspensions for students in grades Kindergarten through six will be served at: School:_ ___________ Location: ____________ _ Time: __________ . Transportation to the Alternative School suspension class is provided. See attached bus schedule. Saturday School Suspensions for students in grades four through twelve will begin at 8:00 a.m. and will dismiss at 12:00 noon. This assignment is effective only on the date shown above. Failure to attend Saturday School will result in further disciplinary action. See attached Saturday School infonnation sheet. Student Assignment Class Suspensions/SAC classes for students in grades seven through twelve are located on each secondary school campus. The class will begin and dismiss within the school's nonnal bell schedule. Home suspensions will be served in the students' homes. If a suspension exceeds four (4) days (not counting today), then it will be reviewed, if a parent or guardian so requests, by the Assistant Superintendent for Student Affairs. A copy of the policies of the Board of Education pertaining the suspensions and expulsions is available for examination at each school and at the Administrative Office .  Parent: Please retain this copy for your records. If you have further questions, please contact the school at Principal Assistant Principal/Administrative Assistant Whitec opy-Parentc opy Yellow copy-Studenct opy Pink copy-Officec opy Goldenrodc opy-StudentA ffairsO ffice 1995-96 B-16 I 1 l ,. 1~93 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ANALYSIS OF DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS DISTRICT LEVEL 1995-96 FRANCICAL J. JACKSON DIRECTORO F STUDENTA FFAIRS Ref: DIS032 flat .. , r./1 /o, Time: 15:26:38 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions r\u0026gt;Tn'l'n (\"'I' r.~r. Prom AUGUST Through MAY l 9 9 4 - 9 5 ===============a======= -----BM------ -----BP------ -----NBM----- -----NBP----- # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ======--------aaaacaaaaa==E=ccmccaaasacc============= 09 S.A.C. 869 46.6\\ 460 24.7\\ 411 22.0\\ 126 6.8\\ 1866 429 252 231 76 988 10 HOME SUSP. 236 50.8\\ 106 22.8\\ 103 22.2\\ 20 4.3\\ 465 166 73 78 17 334 11 BOYS CLUB 133 61.6\\ 44 20.4\\ 31 14.4\\ 8 3.7\\ 216 95 36 28 8 167 12 E. I. C. 178 57.6\\ 68 22.0\\ 58 18.8\\ 5 1.6\\ 30~ 123 55 41 5 224 17 EXPULSION 7 87.5\\ 0 .0\\ 1 12.5\\ 0 .0\\ 8 7 0 1 0 8 ================-------====------====--=-------------------~---=-=== 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 -----BM------ -----BP------ -----NBM----- -----NBP----- # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ==m============== 09 S.A.C. 1043 51.2\\ 445 21.8\\ 410 20.1\\ 140 6.9\\ 2038 450 232 224 89 995 10 HOME SUSP. 141 61.8\\ 42 18.4\\ 42 18.4\\ 3 1.3\\ 228 99 32 31 2 164 11 BOYS CLUB 371 66.1\\ 102 18.2\\ 75 13.4\\ 13 2.3\\ 561 214 67 53 13 347 12 E. I. C. 1540 59.3\\ 489 18.8\\ 498 19.2\\ 71 2.7\\ 2598 554 231 209 42 1036 17 EXPULSION 2 40.0\\ 1 20.0\\ 0 .0\\ 2 40.0\\ 5 2 l 0 2 5 ================------------------------------------------------------------ COMPARISON ===========================a============ -----BM------ -----BP------ -----NBM----- -----NBP----- # REP PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================~-----====---------=-=----------------------------------=- 09 S.A.C. 174 20.0 \\ 15- 3.3-\\ 1- .2-\\ 14 11.l \\ 172 21 20- 7- 13 7 10 HOME SUSP. 95- 40.3-\\ 64- 60.4-\\ 61- 59.2-\\ 17- 85.0-\\ 237- 67- 41- 47- 15- 170- 11 BOYS CLUB 238 178.9 \\ 58 131.8 \\ 44 141. 9 \\ 5 62.5 \\ 345 119 31 25 5 180 12 E.I.C. 1362 765.2 \\ 421 619.l \\ 440 758.6 \\ 66 1320.0 \\ 2289 431 176 168 37 812 17 EXPULSION 5- 71. 4-\\ l 100.0 \\ 1- 100.0-\\ 2 200.0 \\ 3- 5- l 1- 2 3- Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 6/12/96 15:26:49 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. ll BOYS CLUB 12 E.I.C. 17 EXPULSION 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. ll BOYS CLUB 12 E.I.C. 17 EXPULSION Analysis of Disciplinary Actions HIGH SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through MAY l 9 9 4 - 9 5 -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 510 243 80 57 89 57 0 0 5 5 53.9\\ 60.6\\ 7l.8\\ .o, 83.3\\ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 207 128 12 ll 21 19 0 0 0 0 21.9\\ 9.l\\ 16.9\\ .o, .o, l 9 9 5 - 9 6 -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 470 220 20 18 207 116 0 0 2 2 50.2\\ 60.6\\ 7l.l\\ .o, 66 .7\\ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 189 105 7 5 41 31 0 0 l l 20.2\\ 2l.2\\ 14 .l\\ .o, 33.3\\ COMPARISON -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU 180 109 36 32 9 8 0 0 l l 19.0\\ 27 .3\\ 7.3\\ .o, 16.7\\ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU 192 ll0 4 3 36 28 0 0 0 0 20.5\\ 12.l\\ 12.4\\ .o, .o, -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU 49 31 4 4 5 5 0 0 0 0 5.2\\ 3.0\\ 4.0\\ .o, .o, -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU 85 52 2 l 7 7 0 0 0 0 9.l\\ 6.l\\ 2.4\\ .o, .o, 946 511 132 104 124 89 0 0 6 6 936 487 33 27 291 182 0 0 3 3 ====================--------------=--=--=-----------===--=----------------= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =================--=---=-=-====--======-------------=-------------------= 09 S.A.C. 40- 7.8-\\ 18- 8.7-\\ 12 6.7 ' 36 73.5 ' 10- 23- 23- l 21 24- 10 HOME SUSP. 60- 75.0-\\ 5- 4l. 7-\\ 32- 88.9-\\ 2- 50.0-\\ 99- 39- 6- 29- 3- 77- ll BOYS CLUB 118 132.6 ' 20 95.2 ' 27 300.0 ' 2 40.0 ' 167 59 12 20 2 93 12 E.I.C. 0 .0 ' 0 . 0 ' 0 .o ' 0 .o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 3- 60.0-\\ l 100.0 ' l- 100.0-\\ 0 .0 ' 3- 3- l l- 0 3- Ref: DIS032 Date: 6/12/96 Time: 15:26:46 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions MIDDLE SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through MAY 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ====-======---------------------------=------------------------========= 09 S.A.C. 359 39.0% 253 27.5% 231 25.1% 77 8.4% 920 186 124 122 45 477 10 HOME SUSP. 106 43.3% 75 30.6% 49 20.0% 15 6.1% 245 68 49 30 12 159 11 BOYS CLUB 44 47.8% 23 25.0% 22 23.9% 3 3.3% 92 38 17 20 3 78 12 E.I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===================---------------=-------------------------------==-----==== 09 S.A.C. 573 52.0% 256 23.2% 218 19.8% 55 5.0% 1102 230 127 114 37 508 10 HOME SUSP. 5 41. 7% 4 33.3% 3 25.0% 0 .0% 12 5 4 3 0 12 11 BOYS CLUB 164 60.7% 61 22.6% 39 14.4% 6 2.2% 270 98 36 25 6 165 12 E.I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 2 100.0% 2 0 0 0 2 2 aa:asaa:cca=c=aaca:caDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU #STU #STU #STU ========================--===------------------------------------=-= 09 S.A.C. 214 59.6 \\ 3 1.2 \\ 13- 5.6-\\ 22- 28.6-\\ 182 44 3 8- 8- 31 10 HOME SUSP. 101- 95.3-\\ 71- 94.7-% 46- 93.9-% 15- 100.0-% 233- 63- 45- 27- 12- 147- 11 BOYS CLUB 120 272.7 % 38 165.2 % 17 77 .3 \\ 3 100.0 \\ 178 60 19 5 3 87 12 E.I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 \\ 0 .o \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2- 100.0-% 0 .o \\ 0 . 0 \\ 2 200.0 \\ 0 2- 0 0 2 0 Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 6/12/96 15:26:42 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions ELEMENTARY K-6 From AUGUST Through MAY l 9 9 4 - 9 5 ====-==========--=---=-----======--------=------------=-----------= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===================----------=--------=-==--====================== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. so 56.8\\ 19 21. 6\\ 18 20.5\\ l l.l\\ 88 41 13 16 l 71 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 178 57.6\\ 68 22.0\\ 58 18.8\\ 5 1.6\\ 309_ 123 55 41 5 224 17 EXPULSION 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 9 9 5 - 9 6 ========================-------------------------------=-------------------= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =================-=----------------------------------------------------------= 09 S.A.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 115 63.2\\ 31 17.0\\ 35 19.2\\ 1 .5\\ 182 75 23 25 1 124 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 1539 59.3\\ 489 18.8\\ 498 19.2\\ 71 2.7\\ 2597 553 231 209 42 1035 17 EXPULSION 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 =============-=-=-------=------------------------------------------------- COMPARISON ===================s============================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ==================a===s 09 S.A.C. 0 .o \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 65 130.0 \\ 12 63.2 \\ 17 94.4 \\ 0 .o \\ 94 34 10 9 0 53 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 .o \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 1361 764.6 \\ 421 619.1 \\ 440 758.6 \\ 66 1320.0 \\ 2288 430 176 168 37 811 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIS0325 'ate: 6/13/96 1me: 15: 56: 21 chocl: 012 Analysis o~ Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 11/12 --------------------=-======================================-----------========= i 9 9 4 - 9 5 --------------=--================================================================ -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT w STU -----BF------ # REF -PCT/TOT w STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT w STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT w STU -=============================================================-----============= 5.\n,, - 163 58. bi. 51 18. 3i. 54 19. 4% 10 3. 6i: 278 87 41 36 7 171 . \\_' HOMi:: Si.}SF 21 70. 0 .,,. 1 3. 3'1/. 7 23. 3i: 1 - ,.j_ .~..\",,'. 30 19 1 7 1 28 BOYS CLUB 41 -91. 1.,,. 2 'L 47. 2 4.4'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 45 21 2 \"2 0 25 E I. ,-_ -. 0 . Oi: 0 . Oi~ 0 . 0% 0 . Oi. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -\n- EXPi_,iL.5 I ON 4 100_ 0'1/. 0 . O't. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0% 4 4 0 0 0 4 ======~========================================================================= 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 .: --==:..:=---================-=========================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU --=====~=-====~~=======-==-======================================================= S. ~,.. - 192 59. 6'1/. 40 12_ 4'1/. 76 23. 6'1/. 14 4. 3i. 322 98 30 46 1 i 185 HCH'1:= s:_1s~ s: 81. 8% i 9. 1i': 1 9_ n: 0 0% 11 - 1 1 0 9 B ~\n-:UJE iOi 82. 8% 5 4. 1 '1/. 15 12. 3% 1 Bi. 122 5i 5 10 1 67 E. J.. C 0 O,.\n0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 E::\u0026lt;PU\n_SIQt--1 50. 0% 1 50. 0 .,,. 0 0% 0 0% 2 1 i 0 0 2 ------------------------------------------=--=---------------------------------- COMPARISON : -==-=========================================================================== ------Bn------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF-----  REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT\u0026lt;+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =----=~======~=====--=--======================================================== f-. ,.. ~- 29 17. 8 I, 11- 21. 6-% 22 40. 7 I. 4 40. 0 i. 44 11 1 i- 10 4 14 HOM.:: SUSP. 12- 57. 1-i\n0 0 i\n6- 95_ 7-'1/. 1- 100. 0-' 19- 12- 0 6- 1- 19- BOV=: Cl.-LiB 60 146. 3 i: 2 150. 0 I, 13 650. 0 I. 1 100. 0 .,,. 77 ..... ,.:,_~, 3 8 1 42 - 0 0 I, 0 - ~ ~ - 0 i: 0 0 I. 0 0 i: 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 EX?ULSiON ~- 75. 0-i: l 100. 0 I, 0 0 i: 0 0 i\n2- 3- 1 0 0 2- .ef: DIS0325 AnEol1Jsis of Disc ip l ina'T'IJ Actions 6/13/96 by School 15:56:25 From AUGUST Through MAY chool 013 NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 09/10 ---==========================================-==--==========--------------====== l 9 9 4 - 9 5 =---------=-======================--======--==--=-----=-==-----------------====== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NB'F----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------=-===============================================------========----- S. A C 347 51. 9% 156 23. 4% 126 18. 9% 39 5. 8'Y. 668 i58 88 73 24 343 HDl'ic SUSF. 58 e~ .., I. 4'i. 1i iO. 9% 29 28. 7,\n3 3. O'Y. 10i 37 iO 25 3 75 BOYS CLUB 48 60. 8' 19 24. 1 ' 7 8. 9' 5 6. 3' 79 36 17 6 5 64 E. ' .-. 0 0% 0 0' 1 0' 0 Oi'\n0 0 0 0 0 0 EiP:JL..5lON 1 50. 0% 0 0% i 50. Qi'\n0 0% 2 l 0 1 0 2 ====~=========================================================================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ---=================--=-=====================================--------============ -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --~====================-==========================================-=-============ S. H , 278 45. 3'i. 149 24.3% 116 18. 9 71 11. 6'1/. 614 12~ 75 65 42 305 HDMi:: SvSF 1 3~. 3'i. i 33. 3 1 33. 3 0 . O 3\nL 1 1 0 3 BOYS CLUB 68 6i. 3% 21 18. 9 17 15. 3'1/. 5 4. 5' 111 5.-, C. 17 15 5 89 E I.C 0 . Oi: 0 . 0'1/. 0 . Oi: 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 1 100. O't. 0 . 0% 0 . O 0 . 0'1/. 1 1 0 0 0 1 - ---===:====-=--------============================================================ COMPARISON ~~==================-==========================================================-----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+1-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ____\n ======-=-------------=================================================--=- 5 A C. 69- 19. 9-i'\n7- 4. 5-'1/. 10- 7. 9-'1/. 32 82. 1 '1/. 54- 35- 13- 8- 18 38- HOM:: SI_ISP 57- 98. r:_\n~ ,. 10- 90. 9-' 28- 96. 6-'1/. 3- 100. 0-'Y. 98- 36- 9- 24- 3- 72- BOr~ C:...\\.'F 2c, 41 7 I. ~, 10. 5 ., ,:.. ,. 10 142. 9 'Y. 0 0 r. 32 le 0 9 0 25 - ' ... 0 (, I. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 /. 0 0 '1/. 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 0 0 ,\n. 0 0 % 1- 100. o- 0 0 'Y. 1- 0 0 1- 0 1- DIS032S Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 6/13/96 by School ,ime: 15: 56:25 From AUGUST Through MAY _ch oo l 020 NLRHS-WEST ANNEX M-0W'\\fr b=-==================================\ni,~========================================= 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 -=-----------============================:ac=:===================================== -----Br-1------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NEF----# REF PCT/TOT w STU -===========================================================--==--==========:=== 5. A C. 0 0'1/. 0 O 0 O 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HDr1i:: SUSP. 0 0.,, . 0 0 .,, . 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 l BOVS CLUB 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O'l. 0 0 0 -o 0 0 E. I. C. 0 0'1/. 0 O 0 O' 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 - EiPU-SIOr-i 0 O' 0 O 0 O 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~====~========================================================================= 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 =-===========-================================================--------============ -----BM------ ~ REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ================================================================================ 5. A r 0 . 0% 0 . O'Y. 1 100. 0% 0 . O'Y. 1 0 0 1 0 1 HOM:i: 3USC:1 11 50. o\n,: 7 31. 8'1/. 4 18. 2i: 0 . Ot. 22 11 5 3 0 19 BOYS C1-.UB 38 60. 3'Y. 20 31. 7'1/. 4 6. 3'Y. 1 1. 61. 63 25 14 4 1 44 E - { .L. ~ 0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 . Ot. 0 . Ot. 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXP!JL.SION 0 . 01. 0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 --=-=====~~--------===========================================================-- COMPARISON ~~==~=~========================================================================~ -----EM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCTl+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -=---==~==============-=--=========================================================== s F-.\n., 0 .0 I. 0 .0 % 1 100. 0 - 0 .0 '1/. 1 C, 0 1 0 1 HLil'iE SU3P 11 1100. 0 ,: 7 700.0 'Y. 4 400.0 'Y. 0 .0  22 11 5 3 0 19 BC!YS ,: ... iJE 38 3800. 0 I. 20 2000. 0 ,: 4 400. 0 I. 1 100.0 t. 63 25 14 4 1 44 -- - '-. 0 .0 '1/. 0 .0 I. 0 .0 - 0 .0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 r:x\n:uLSION 0 .0 I. 0 .0 I. 0 .0 t. 0 .0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ef: DIS0325 :\u0026gt;ate: 6/ !3/96 ,ime: 15: 56: 30\nc hool: 024 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY RIDGERDAD MIDDLE SCHOOL =--------------========================================------------------=----=~ i 9 9 4 - 9 5 ---------------=============================================--================== -----BM------ # RE'F PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NIF ----# RE'F PCT/TOT # STU ===========================================================---------============ :9 S. A C. 131 30. Oi:. 128 29. 4'Y. 122 28. Oo/\n55 12. 6'1/. 436 73 57 53 32 215 ~0 HOi'i:i:: SUSF. 72 39. 81: bi 33. 7'Y. 34 18. 8'1/.. 14 7. n\n181 4i 38 19 11 109 11 BOVS CLUB 18 54. 5 4 12. 1 'Y. 8 24. 2'Y. 3 9. 1 'Y. 33 16 4 7 3 30 . ~- E. I. c. 0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 - O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ..:.7 ~X?ULSIO~-. i 100. Qi'\n0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. i i 0 0 0 i ======~==============:=========================================================== 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~=======================================================-==--------============= -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ~====~=========================================================================== _-r 5 f-. --. 2'?5 50. 4'1/. 158 27. 0'1/. 99 16.9% 33 5.61, 585 . ,J .V\"C..., 67 48 ,,,, \"-\"- 242 :i.0 HOME. SUSP. 1 100. Qi\n0 . 01o 0 . 0% 0 . O 1 1 0 0 0 1 BOVS CLUB 71 54. 6% 39 30. 0% 16 12.3 4 3. 1% 130 42 22 11 4 79 , ,.., ..:..:.. E . I C 0 . Or. 0 . 0% 0 . Oi. 0 . O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 :7 EXPULSI  f\\, 0 . Oi. 0 . Oi: 0 . O 1 100.0i. 1 0 0 0 1 1 =~~==~========================================================================== COMPARISON\n~~=~--~~============~=========================================================== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REf PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCTi+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ~=====~========================================================================= - ~- A C. 164 125. 2 /a 30 23. 4 /a 23- 18. 9- 22- 40. 0- 149 32 10 5- 10- 27 . '\nHOr-i= SUSP 71- 98. 6-'1/. 61- 100. 0- 34- 100. 0-'1/. 14- 100. 0- 180- 40- 38- 19- 11- 108- BC::,:\nCL...UB 53 294. 4 ,\n. 35 875. 0 '1/. 8 100. 0 '1/. 1 33. 3 /a 97 - 26 18 4 1 49 -- - :i: - 0 0 '1/. 0 0 % 0 0 'Y. 0 0 'Y. 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 . EiPUL.SION 1- 100. 0-i': 0 0 ' 'Y. 0 0 '1/. 1 100. 0 'Y. 0 1- 0 0 1 0 .e-f DIS0325 6/13/96 ime 15:56:31 ~hool: 025 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL ======================--=-===================================================== i 9 9 4 - 9 5 ~=====:==========-===-------===================================================== -----Br-1------ 4' REr PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REr PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REr PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU =====~================----===========--===------============-====--============ S. A. ~. \\..,. 96 51. 6'1/. 47 25. 3'1/. 41 22. 0'1/. 2 1. 1' Y. 186 55 3i 29 2 117 .. HOM:C: SiJSP. 8 42. io/. 4 21. 1o/. 6 3i. 6% i 5. 3% 19 8 3 6 1 18 BOYS CLUB 8 27. 6'1/. 14 48. 3 7 24. 1 0 0'1/. 29 5 8 6 0 19 2 E. I. -- 0 0o/. 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 O'l: 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSIOr-.i 0 0'1/. 0 Oo/. 0 07: 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=====================~=====================================------------======== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ======~========================================--======-===--------------====== -----Bt.\n------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --===~====================--==================================================== S. A .-. 135 63. 1 ., ,. 36 16. 8% 39 18. 2% 4 1. 9% 214 71 28 27 3 129 HOMi: susr=. l 50. Oi\n1 50. 0% 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 2 i 1 0 0 2 BO'{~ C1-UE 47 79. 7i: 5 8. 5'1/. 7 11. 9' 0 . 0o/. 59 28 4 5 0 37 E. I C 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . Oi: 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXPUi_S ION \\ . .\u0026gt; . 0o/. 0 . 0% 0 . 01 1 100.07. 1 0 0 0 1 1 ::.. :===.:=========================================================================== COMPARISON ===========================================================================~== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # RE~ PCT(+/-) # REr PCTI+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # STU #\"STU # STU # STU ~~===~=~========================================================================= '\"\" ~- r- 39 40. 6 '1/. 11- 23. 4-% 2- 4. 9-o/. 2 100. 0  28 16 3- 2- 1 12 - HOM:: SUSF 1- 87. 5-'1/. 3- 75. 0-'1/. b- 100. 0- 1- 100. 0- 17- 7- 2- b- 1- 16- BOY.=. C:...JJ\n3q 487. 5 ,\n. 9- 64. 3-'1/. 0 0 o/. 0 0 t. 30 23 4- 1- 0 18 - - - ~. C C, /. 0 0 /. 0 0 o/. 0 0  0 - -- 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 0 0 I. 0 0 I. 0 0 '1/. 1 100. 0 '1/. 1 0 0 0 1 1 Ref: L\u0026gt;IS032S Date: 6/13/96 Time: 15: 56: 33 School. 026 ROSE Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL ================================================================================ i 9 9 4 - 9 5 ======:========================================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT * REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU 4i STU * STU * STU ====================---==========--========------==-=======----================= Q9 S. A. C. 132 44. 3' 78 26. 2'Y. 68 22. B'Y. 20 6. 7 .,,. 298 bi 37 42 11 151 10 HOM:i:. SUBP. 26 59. i'Y. 9 20. 5 9 20. 5' 0 O'Y. 44 20 8 6 0 34 11 BOYS CLUB 18 60. O'Y. 5 16. 7 7 23. 3'Y. 0 O'Y. 30 17 5 7 0 29 i2 E. I. C. 0 O'Y. 0 O'Y. 0 O'Y. 0 . o~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 - E\n,(Pi.JLSIOl\\i i 100. O'Y. 0 O'Y. 0 O'Y. 0 O'Y. i 1 0 0 0 1 i 9 9 5 - 9 6 -===========================================--====-=========----================ -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --=====--===--=--==--------===============----==============-==-================ ,:,~ 5. A - i43 47. 4% 62 20. 5 79 26. 2'Y. 18 6. 0% 302 63 36 38 12 149 10 HOME susi:_ ~- C: 66. 7 .,,. 0 0 .,, . 1 33. 3'1/. 0 O'Y. 3 2 0 1 0 3 11 BOY::i CLUB 46 60. 5 12 15. B'Y. 16 21. 1' 2 2. 6'Y. 76 29 8 9 2 48 12 E. I. G 0 O 0 O'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 0% 0 O'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ============================================================================~=-= COMPARISON ---=-:=-====------==-============================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-i # REF PCT(+/-i # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ----------------------------================================================---- )S -- A -:. 1i 8. 3 ,.\n:\n, 16- 20. 5-'1/. 11 16. 2 '1/. 2- 10. 0-'Y. 4 c~.. . 1- 4- 1 2- ~o HDME SUSP. 24- 92. 3-~~ 9- 100. 0-'Y. 8- 88. 9-'Y. 0 0 'Y. 41- 18- 8- 5- 0 31- - l BOYS c:...uB 28 155. 6 'Y. .I. . 140. 0 'Y. 9 128. 6 '1/. 2 200. 0 '1/. 46 12 3 2 2 19 l2 - I ,,. 0 0 '1/. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 '1/. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,- !. ' E1.F-..it..SI ON 1- iOO. 0-'Y. 0 0  0 0 'Y. 0 0 'Y. 1- 1- 0 0 0 1- .ef: DIS032S Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 6/13/96 by School 15: 56:33 From AUGUST Through MAY 030 BARING CROSS CENTER ----------==================================================---=----------====== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ======================================================================-========= ----- B t\"i------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ============================================================---=----============ S. A. C. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O' 0 . 0' 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOMi:: SUSP. 1 50. Oi'~ 1 50. O 0 . o,: 0 . 0/~ 2 1 1 0 0 2 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . O' 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C. 0 . O 0 . O 0 . O' 0 - . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 0 . o,~ 0 . 01. 0 . Oi~ 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 --================--------======================================-=-==--========= l 9 9 5 - 9 c, -----=~---------------------====----===------------=--==----------------======== -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ----===-~-=====-================================================================== 5. A .-- 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SUSF 0 . Ot. i 33. 3'Y. 0 . 0'Y. 2 66. 7 3 0 1 0 1 2 BDYS CLUB 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0% 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I C 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 0 . O 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---============================================================================== COMPARISON =~===:========================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-1 # REF PCT(+/-i # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ------------------------======================================================== S. A. C. 0 .0 i. 0 .0 i: 0 .0 I 0 .0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SUSP 1- 100. 0-i: 0 .0 I, 0 .0 I, 2 200.0 I, 1 1- 0 0 1 0 . , BOYS CL..UB 0 .0 i: 0 .0 I, 0 .0 I 0 .0 I, 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 2 ~ I - 0 .0 i\n0 .0 i~ 0 .0 la 0 .0 i\n0 0 0 0 0 0 ~7 EXPULSION 0 .0 ,. 0 .0 I, 0 .0 I 0 .0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 ef: DIS0325 6/13/96 15:56:34 ::hool: 031 AMBOY Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =============================================================================== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 - ---------=========================-=========-=----=====-==-----------------===== -----BM------ # RE'F PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF\" PCT/TOT # STU -----NBH----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ============================================================-------============ B. A. C. 0 . Or. 0 . Or. 0 . Or. 0 . Or. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SvSP. ..\ni 75. Oi: 0 . Oi: 1 25. Oi: 0 .Oi: 4 2 0 1 0 3 BOYS CLUB 0 . Ot. 0 . Or. 0 . Or. 0 . O't. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C. 9 34. bi: 9 34. 6Y. 0 30. 8 0 . O't. 26 9 6 6 0 21 E\u0026gt;::PUL.SION 0 . 01. 0 . 01 0 . Qi\n0 . Oi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=====~========================================================================= l 9 9 5 - 9 6 -------------------------------========------==================-=---============== -----EM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----------------------------==========----===--=============-================== S. ,=... ... 0 0'1/.. 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOMt: S:JSP 10 l-:.j-.. ..:,. 3o/. i 8. 3'1/. i 8. 3'1/. 0 O'Y. 12 iO i 1 0 12 BOYS CLUB 0 01: 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C Se 57. 1 % 13 13. 3'Y. 25 25. 5t. 4 4. 1'Y. 98 38 7 18 4 67 EXPULSION 0 01. 0 Or. 0 O'Y. 0 Or. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------==:-==========================================================------ COMPARISON -------------------=======================================================------ -----Bt1------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF P:T1+/-i # REF PCT(+/-i # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ==-----==------------=========================================================== s . M. r 0 .0 /. 0 .0 t. 0 .0 t. 0 .0 t. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOMi:: SiJSP. 7 233. 3 i\n1 100. 0 Y. 0 .0 Y. 0 .0 ., lo 8 8 1 0 0 9 BC:VS CL..UB 0 .0 i: 0 .0 ,. 0 .0 ,. 0 .0 i: 0 0 0 0 0 0 - I C 47 .0 i: 4 .0 i\n17 .0 i~ 4 .0 'Y. 72 5 0 17 4 46 Ex.PU ...S.. IOl'l 0 .0 - 0 .0 ., 0 .0 ., ,. ,. 0 .0  0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ef: DIS032S Date: 6/13/96 Time: 15: 56: 34 3chool: 032 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =------------------------=---=-====================-------------------------==== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 -------------=-----==-=-====================================--=========-======== -----E t4------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU * STU * STU # STU ======================= =================================================== -:\n,c S. f1. '~. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 HOME' SUSP. 9 75. 0% 2 16. 7.,, . 1 8. 3.,, . 0 0% 12 b 2 1 0 9 1 i BOYS CLUB 0 0% 0 . Oo/. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ., 4,:\n_ E. I. C. 3 37. Si. 4 50. 0% 0 12. 5' 0 0% 8 3 4 1 0 B ~ / EXPU!...SION 0 o , 0 . O'Y. 0 Oi. 0 Oi'~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ======~======================================================================~== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~=============================================================================== -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ================================================================================ ,:,c: S. A ~ 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O'Y. 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SIJSP. 6 66. 71. ~. C. 22. 2% 1 11. 1 '}~ 0 . 01. 9 3 1 1 0 5 11 i3OYS CLUE 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O'}~ 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 i2 E. I C 23 47.9% 7 i4.6% 18 37. St. 0 . 0%. 48 . .., 17 3 7 0 27 Ei(PUL.SION 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . 01. 0 . : 0 0 0 0 0 ====~======================================================================COMPARISON --====~======--=-==-============================================================ -----Bl'-1------ -----B'F------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) * REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU * STU # STU ~===~======~==================================================================== 09 S. A C 0 0 I. 0 0 i. 0 0 i. 0 .0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SIJSP. 3- 33. 3-1. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 I. 3- 3- 1- 0 0 4- 11 BDY::, Ci...UB 0 0 i: 0 0 'Y. 0 0 i. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 l.2 r:::. :i: - 20 0 i. 3 0 '1/. 17 0 '1/. 0 0 lo 40 7 1 17 0 19 4. EXPiJt..SION 0 0  0 0 'Y. 0 0 i. 0 0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 .ef: DIS032S ate: 6ii3/96 15: 56:37 chool: 033 BOONE Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ==============================================================--=---=--======== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ~================================================-===========--====-----======== -----BM------ w REF\" PCT/TOT # STLI -----BF------ # REF\" PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU ===============================================================--=-============ S. A. C. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SUSP 3 75. 0'1/. 0 . O 1 25. O' 0 . 0/~ 4 3 0 1 0 4 BOYS CLUB 0 . O'l. 0 . O 0 . 0' 0 . O'l. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C. 12 66. 7 2 11. 1 0 22. 2' 0 . 0% 18 9 1 4 0 14 EXPULSION 0 . O'l. 0 . O 0 . o,: 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ================================================================================ i 9 9 5 - 9 6 --====~==========-===========================================-==-=============== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -=============================================================================== 5. A. C. 0 . O' 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O' 0 . O'l. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOM= s, JC\n~ 1i 47.8'1/. 2 8. 7 10 43. 5 0 . O 23 6 2 4 0 12 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O' 0 . O 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 t:.. I. C 25i 52.8 105 22. 1 ,105 22. 1 14 2.9 475 72 40 27 9 148 EXPULSION 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~==~=======-=================================================================== COMPARISON -:=========~===================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTl+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU .\n_-----==-====-------------===============================================-------- S. A ~ 0 0 '1/. 0 0 I. 0 0 I 0 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 i-iOM:: SUSP. 8 266. 7 i: 2 200. 0 I 9 900. 0 .,,. 0 0  19 3 2 3 0 8 BOY:: :L..UE 0 0 'l. 0 0 i: 0 0 ., 0 0 ., ,. ,. 0 (i 0 0 0 0 .:. r - -. 239 0 % 103 0 ' 101 0 'l. 14 0 I 457 20 52 101 14 134 E\u0026gt;..PULSION 0 0 ,. 0 0 ., 0 0 ., 0 0 ., ,. ,. ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ef: DIS032S 6/13/96 i1me: 15: 56: 37 chool 035 Analysis of Discipline~y Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =====================================================================-==-====== i 9 9 4 - 9 5 ======~========================================================================= -----BM------ # RE'F PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------===============================---=------------=-==-------------=======- S. A. C. 0 0% 0 01/. 0 0% 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOri:i:: SuSP. 3 37. Si'.: 0 O 5 62. 5~~ 0 Oi'.: 8 3 0 3 0 6 i BOYS CLUB 0 0% 0 0% 0 o,~ 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 E. I. C. 5 62. 5 0 0% 0 37. 5% 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 6 EiPULSIOi\\i C, 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 o~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~============================================================================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~============~================================================================= -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCTiTOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -=======:======================================================================= . .,. - I-. ,- 0 . Oi~ 0 . 0% 0 . O 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 . c, HOME SUSP . c:: 28. 6\n~ 3 42. 9% c:: 28. 6 0 . 0 7 2 3 1 0 6 BOYS CLUB 0 . 01. 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . Oi. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I C. 51 55. 4,\n19 20. 7 22 23.91. 0 . Ot. 92 33 11 13 0 57 EXPUi...SION 0 . Oi: 0 . Oi. 0 . Oi\n0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 =-~===::.:=-========:======================================================s======-==--- COMPARISON ~~===~=~=:====================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTI+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU #- STU # STU # STU ~~====~========================================================================= ~-- A C 0 0 % 0 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 !-iOl\"t:c SUSF- i- 33. 3-i'~ 3 300. 0 ~\n3- 60. 0-'1/. 0 .0 i. 1- 1- 3 2- 0 0 BCvs CLUB 0 .0 '1/. 0 .0  0 .0  0 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 - I i.. 4b .0 /. 19 0 I. 19 .0 ,. 0 .0 % 84 q 19 19 0 51 EXPULSION 0 .0 I. 0 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 (I 0 0 0 0 ~ Ref: DIS032S Analysis of Disciplinary Actions\n:,ate: 6/13/96 by School Time: 15.56:38 From AUGUST Through MAY School 037 LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ============================================================---===-===-----===== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # RE'F PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT w REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---==---------====================-=======----------====-==---------============ :,9 S. A. C. 0 0.,,. 0 01. 0 0% 0 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 l\\.J HOME SUSP. 3 25. 0'1/. 5 41. 71. 4 33. 3/: 0 0.,, . 12 3 2 4 0 9 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 .,,. 0 O' 0 Oo/. 0 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -\n_2 E. I. C. 8 44. 4'1/. 7 38. 9% 0 16. 7% 0 0% 18 6 7 2 0 15 :: 7 EXPU!...SION 0 0 .,, . 0 o,\n0 0 .,,. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ======~~======================================================================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ================================================================================ -----BM------ # RE\"F PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ * REF PCTiTOT # STU -----NBM----* REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ================================================================================ :)c\n, s ,:._ C 0 0% 0 . 01. 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOl'E SUSF. i5 65.2% 5 2i. n\n3 13. 0o/. 0 . 0o/. 23 i2 3 3 0 18 l .i. B  vs CL.UB 0 0% 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0 0 . O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. 7~ - ,r._ 120 63. 2% 36 18.9 31 16. 3'Y. 3 1. 6'Y. 190 59 27 21 2 109 17 EXPUt...SIOt~ 0 . 01. 0 . O 0 . 0% 0 . O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 =~==========================================================================~=== COMPARISON =~===~=======:==============================================================-----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTI+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =~==========================================================================~=== )9 ::,_ 1-c ,- - 0 .0 i: 0 0 'l. 0 .0 % 0 .0 'Y. 0 C, 0 0 0 0 1.0 HOME SiJSP. 12 400. 0 I. 0 0 '1/. 1- 25. 0-1. 0 .0 ' 11 9 1 1- 0 9 ~ ... BC:VS C,_Ur\n0 .0 i\n0 0 ., 0 0 % 0 .0 ., ,. ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~.:. ~ I ~ ... 112 0 i\n29 0 i\n28 .0 i: 3 .0 'l. 172 14 4 28 3 94 :i.--\nE\u0026gt;C:\n:,ULSiON 0 .0 I. 0 .0 .,,. 0 .0  0 .0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Analvsis of Disciplinarv Actions Date: 6/13/96 bv School Time: 15:56:40 From AUGUST Through MAY School 038 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY ================================================================================ 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ================================================================================ -----Bi-1------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU =~============================================================================== v-r S. A. C. 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :.G HOME SUSP 2 66. 7% 0 . 0% 1 33. 3% 0 . 0'1/. 3 2 0 1 0 3 11 BO'fS CLUB 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0 ,1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... _:. E. I. C . 47 73.4% 4 6.3'Y. 0 18.8% 0 1. 6'Y. 64 29 4 6 1 40 17 E)(PUi....SIDN 0 . O'Y. 0 . 0'Y. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . Oi. 0 0 0 0 0 0 =======~======================================================================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ # REV PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --------------==-----------=======--===-======================================== --):\n, E /:,, :... 0 0% 0 0% 0 Oi'~ 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~v 1-iCJM: SUSF- :-3.-. ,:\n8 .-. c:.. 1% i 2. 6'i'~ b 15. 4' 0 O' 39 i5 i 4 0 20 l J BOVS CL..iJB 0 0% 0 Oi'~ 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 c . ... C 145 62. 5,\n. 33 14. 2~: 48 20. 7i'~ 6 2. 6 232 60 20 18 5 103 17 HPULSION 0 0% 0 0% 0 O' 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =========================================================================-=-=~=- COMPARISON ====~=========================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF P-:\nT ( +/-i # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-\u0026gt; # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU --------------------------==============================================------=- .)9 s A r. 0 0 i: 0 0 i: 0 0  0 0 'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 :..:: HOM:: SUSP 30 1500. 0 I. 1 100. 0 'Y. 5 500. 0  0 0  36 13 1 3 0 17 l ! BOY:= CLiJB 0 0 I. 0 0 I. 0 0 ,. 0 0 'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 l\n: i:. I ~ 98 0 I, 29 0 I. 36 0  5 0 'Y. 168 2 7 36 5 63 :7 EXPULSION 0 0 i: 0 0 ., 0 0 ., 0 0 ., I, - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 D!S0325 Analysis of Disciplinar~ Actions 6il3/96 by School 15:56:40 From AUGUST Through MAY 040 MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ----=================================---=-=--=-----------------------------===== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 =======~=====================================================-==-===--========== -----B ,\n------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF P\"CT/T OT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ================================================================----============ S. A C. 0 . 0% 0 . 01o 0 . 01o 0 . Oi'~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOME: =\u0026gt;'-'::\u0026gt;~. 0 . Oi\n0 . Oi: 0 .Oi: 0 . Oi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOYS CLUB 0 . 01o 0 . 0% 0 . D1o 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C. 3 21. 4% 7 50.01o 0 28.61o 0 . Oi'~ 14 3 6 3 0 12 EXPU~SIOt 0 . o~,: 0 . 0% 0 . Oi'~ 0 . o~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 i. 9 9 5 - 9 6 ====~=:=======~================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ================================================================================ :::. F, ' 0 01. 0 01o 0 01o 0 01o 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCiM:C Si,_iSF 0 01. 0 01o 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOYS CLUB 0 0% 0 01o 0 01. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. I. C 77 42. 31. 37 20. 31o 50 27. 51o 18 9. 91o 182 33 17 14 7 71 EXPULSION 0 0% 0 01. 0 01o 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :~==~~========================================================================== COMPARISON =======-======================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-i # REF PCT(+/-) * REF PCT(+/-) * REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =====~~~======================================================================== S. A C 0 0 i: 0 0 'l. 0 0 'l. 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOMi:: SUSP 0 0 i: 0 0 '1/. 0 0 - 0 0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOV3 Ct....t.JB 0 0 i~ 0 0 lo 0 0 '1/. 0 0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ I C 74 0 i~ 30 0 '1/. 46 0 '1/. 18 0 '1/. 168 25 4 46 18 59 EXPULSION 0 0 i: 0 0 lo 0 0 lo 0 0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 '\n-- ..: ~ef: D!S032S t\nate: bi 13/96 Time: 15: 56: 41 '3chool: 041 Anal~sis of Disciplinar~ Actions b~ School From AUGUST Through MAY NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ====================================================-=======------============== i 9 9 4 - 9 5 ~====================================================-=====-----=-============== -----i3t\" ------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REr PCTiTOT # REF PCT/TOT # REr PCT/TOT # STU * STU * STU # STU ================-===-------======--=-----===-====--====---=-----------========== )9 S. A. C. 0 . O'Y. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'i'\n0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSF. 1 100. 0'1/. 0 . 01 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 1 i 0 0 0 1 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0i. 0 . 0:1. 0 . 0i. 0 . 0i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 i.2 E. ! . '-.... 26 65. Qi. 8 20. 0i. 0 10. Qi. 0 - 5. 0i. 40 16 7 4 2 29 EXPULSION 0 . O'Y. 0 . 0i. 0 . 0i~ 0 . 0i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -===~========-====-============================================================= 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ------------------------------------===--=-=-==--------====--------============= -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBr----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ---------------------------------======-=======--=================-============= --,,:j, S. A C 0 O'i'\n0 0% 0 O'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOM:: SUSF- 1 33. 3'1/. 2 66. 7'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0i. 3 1 2 0 0 3 11 BOYS CLUB 0 O'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 ,.. .c.. I. C 121 50. 6'1/. 54 22. 6'Y. 51 21. 3% 13 5. 4i. 239 38 23 23 6 90 i7 EXPULSION 0 0'1/. 0 O'Y. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON --------------------------======================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCTI+/-) # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-) # STU #-STU # STU # STU -==================================----=------------------=--------------=---==~ :9 C.. .,_{ -. ,-. 0 0 'l. 0 0 'l. 0 0 '1/. 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 iO HOME SUSP. 0 0 '1/. ,, 200. 0 ., ~ I, 0 0 '1/. 0 0 '1/. 2 0 2 0 0 2 ~ ! BOVS CL.iJB 0 0 I, 0 0 ., I, 0 0 '1/. 0 0 '1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:..::: E I r. 95 0 '1/. 4o 0 '1/. 47 0 I. 11 0 '1/. 199 4 6 47 11 61 -\nEXPUL.SION 0 0 I, 0 0 ., I, 0 0 la 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 = ~ef: DIS032S Analvsis of Disciplinarv Actions Date: 6/13/96 by School Time: 15:56:42 From AUGUST Through MAY 3=hooi 042 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ==================================================================---=----====== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ============================================================---=-======--======= -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # -STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT ,it STU ==================================================================-------======= }'t S. A. C. 0 . 01a 0 . 01a 0 . 01a 0 . o,\n0 0 0 0 0 0 1.G HOME SUSP. 5 55. 6% 4 44. 4% 0 . 0% 0 . 0i: 9 4 3 0 0 7 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0i. 0 .Di. 0 . 0% 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .!..:.'. E I. t-, . 24 82. 8% 3 10. 3% 0 6. 9% 0 . 0% 29 16 2 2 0 20 . ' EXPiJLSION 0 . 01. 0 . 0% 0 . 0i: 0 . 01. O 0 0 0 0 0 =======================~=================~c~s================================c= 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 -============================================================-================== -----BM------ -----BF------ ~ REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -=====~========================================================================= :19 S. A C. 0 . o,: 0 . 01. 0 . 0% 0 . 0i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .10 HOl'E SUSP. 17 85. 0% 2 10. m~ 1 5. 0% 0 . 0i. 20 . , ii r.:.:.. . 1 0 14 J ~ BOYS CLUB 0 . o\n,\n0 . 0% 0 . o\n,\n0 . 0i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 230 75. 2i. 54 17.61. 20 6. 5\n,\n2 . 7i. 306 48 24 10 2 84 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0% 0 . 0i. 0 . 0% 0 . 0i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 =~===~========================================================================== COMPARISON ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ==~==========================================================================m== .:,9 s I-, ,. - 0 0 '1/. 0 0 i\n0 0 la 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME: SUSP. 12 240. 0 '1/. 2- 50. 0 -,., . 1 100. 0 i. 0 0 i. 11 7 1- 1 0 7 :. 1 BOYS Ct..UB 0 0 :. (I 0 la 0 0 la 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~:. E I ~ 206 0 '1/. 51 0 la 18 0 la 2 0 la 277 ~ 9 17 18 2 64 17 EXPULSION 0 0 '1/. 0 0 ,. 0 0 ,. 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 :Ref: DIS032S 'Date: 6i13/96 1me. 15: 56: 43 School: 043 PARK Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ================================================================================ 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 =======--------=----=-------=====--============================================= -----8 [j-----.. REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NEM----w REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU =-============================================================================== -,:.~ S. A. C. 0 Oi. 0 Oi. 0 Oi. 0 O.\n. 0 0 0 0 0 0 i.J HOMc s0s.:. 1 100. Oi. 0 Oi. 0 Oi. 0 0 .,, . 1 1 0 0 0 1 i 1 BOYS CLUB 0 .Oi. 0 Oi. 0 Oi. 0 O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 2 ,,,, c.c:.. 2% 1 11. 1% 0 66. 7.,,. 0 Oi. 9 2 1 3 0 6 ,-  I EXPULSION 0 0.,,. 0 Oi. 0 0% 0 O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 =======~=====================================================================~=1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ----===--------------------===-----=====-=-=------==========--=-----============ -----BM------ # Rl::T PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF\" PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF\" PCT/TOT # STU ------------------------------------====-------=-=-===-========================== a ...... HOt-i:C SU2P 11 BOYS CLUB 12:E.I.C l 7 EXPULSION 0 0 0 0 0 100 32 0 0 0'1/. 68.0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 0 0 0'1/. 0'1/. 0% 8.8 0'1/. 0 0 1 1 0 0 33 15 0 0 0'1/. 100.0% 22.4'1/. 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0% 0'1/. O't. 7'1/. Oi. 0 0 1 1 0 0 147 Sc 0 0 ================================================================================ COMPARISON ~============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF' PCTi+/-) # REF PCTi+/-i # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ------------------------------------========================================-=--- = - I-. - 0 0 I. 0 0 I. .o 0 / 0 0 t. 0 0 0 0 0 0 :.C: r-iOMr: SJ3F 1- 100. 0-% 0 0 I. 1 100. 0 / 0 0 i. 0 1- 0 1 0 0 BOY:: :U.iB t) 0 i: 0 0 i: 0 0 i: 0 0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. !::. .. -- 98 0 I. 12 0 I. 27 0 I. 1 0 i. 138 ' 4~ 12 27 1 50 17 EXPvLSIOt-i 0 0 i: 0 0 ,. 0 0 i. 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIS0325 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions !:)ate: 6/13/96 b\\j School Time: 15:56:43 From AUGUST Through MAY :3~hool 044 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL :~=============================================================================== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 =~============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NEF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU :--=================================-====-===--=-------==--=-----------========== -s. A. C. 0 0 ., 1. 0 0., 1. 0 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o HOME SUSP. 1 50. 0 ., I. 1 50. 0'1/. 0 Oi: 0 0'1/. 2 1 1 0 0 2 11 BOYS CLUE 0 0'1/. 0 .-0~ 0 0% 0 O'Y. 0 0 0 O 0 0 ~2 E. I. ,.. \\.,. 15 83. 3'Y. 3 16. 7'Y. 0 0% 0 - O'Y. 18 iO 3 0 0 13 ~7 EXPULSION 0 0% 0 Ot. 0 Ot. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =============================================================-==-=============== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ======~=====================================================-----------========= -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ================================================================================ 10 H  t-E susi:- ~l BOY~ CLUB ~2.c.:i.C 17 EXPULS:\n:  N 0 0 l 1 0 0 99 30 0 0 . O'Y. 100. 0'1/. . 0'1/. 68.8% . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 i4 0 0 . 0% . 0% 18. 1% . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 12 0 0 . 0'1/. . 0% . 0'1/. 13. 2'1/. . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0'1/. . 0'1/. . Ot. . 0'1/. . O'Y. 0 0 1 1 0 0 144 56 0 0 ~~=============~===========================================================--=~ COMPARISON ==-~=~~====~===================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTi+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-)  STU # STU # STU # STU =-=====================~========================================================= )C? -- ,\n, :: _ 0 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 I 0 .0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 :0 r-lOMc 2us~ 0 0 'l. 1- 100. 0 -1.. , 0 .0 .1,. 0 .0 .1,. 1- 0 1- 0 0 1- :. l BOYS \\:LUB 0 0 i~ 0 .0 ., 1. 0 .0 I 0 .0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 . - ~ . C. 84 0 i: 23 .0 ' 19 .0 I 0 .0 'Y. 126 6 8 19 0 43 - E\u0026gt;'.PULSION 0 .0 i~ 0 .0 % 0 .0 '1/. 0 .0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 :\n_~ f: DI 8032S Date: 6i13/96 Time: 15: 56 44 3~hool: 045 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ================================================================----===--======= 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ~~==========---=======------=------==============--=---========--===-=========== -----Bh------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT .+ STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU =============-~==================--==============----=========================== _,...\nS. f,, C. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :.,,:, HOME SUSP. 4 50. O'i. 3 37. 5 .,, . 1 12. 5% 0 Qi\n8 4 2 1 0 7 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 01. 0 u 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 4 25. 0'1/. 9 56. 3 0 18. Bi. 0 Oi. 16 4 5 2 0 11 , 7 EX.PUL_SION 0 0 .,, . 0 0'1/. 0 0.,, . 0 0 .,, . 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~===~=~=====================================================================c=~= 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ----------------=--------------==--==============-=============================== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ---------------===---------=--=-=-============================================== :,~ 5. A ,. 0 0'1/. 0 . Ot. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:.c .. HOl'l= SU::iP. 4 80. 0'1/. 0 Oi. i 20. 0'1/. 0 . 01. 5 3 0 1 0 4 l l BOY\nCLUB 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0% 0 . O'Y. 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -, r\n\"'- E. I. (. 15 78. 9'1/. 3 15.8% 1 5. 3~~ 0 . 0'1/. 19 4 3 1 0 8 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O'Y. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -===~================================================-------------------===-===- COMPARISON -=:-:========-==-======================================================================-= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCTI+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -~-----------=------------==================================================--= ...,.,. ::\n~- I'\"\\ - 0 0 i:. 0 0 I. 0 0 lo 0 0 '1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ : _ ! HOME SUSF'. 0 0 ,. 3- 100. 0 -,.,. 0 0 lo 0 0 4 3- 1- 2- 0 0 3- : l B,--,. ..., =_. C.L .U P 0 0 i:. (\\ 0 i: 0 0 .,, . 0 0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 - .::.: , 11 0 ,. 6- 0 - 2- 0 ., ~- - ~. ,. 0 0 I 3 3 1- 2- 0 3- EX:PU:...SIOI', 0 0 i: 0 0 i~ 0 0 ., - 0 0 i. 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 'i:ef: DIS032S ]ate: 6/ 13/96 7ime: 15: 56: 44 School: 046 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL --------=====================================-=----=--====-=----------------==== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ----===--=-------------======-================----==---=====-----------------=--- -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----Nlff ----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ~==============================================================---------=-====== j~ ~. A. - 0 O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 . 0i. 0 . O'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - Hr\"ii: SiJ3F. 9 69. 2i. 1 7. 71. 2 15. 4'1/. 1 7. n~ 13 - 6 l 2 1 10 '- l, BOYS CLUB 0 . O'Y. 0 . O 0 . 0i. 0 . 0i. 0 0 -o O 0 0 . , E . .- 7 77. Bi. 2 22.2 0 . O 0 . O 9 ~ ... ~. 6 2 0 0 8 . , EXPULSION 0 . O'Y. 0 . O'Y. 0 0 .,,. 0 . o,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~============================================================================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~=====:========================================================================== -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----* REF PCT/TOT # STU ~~====~~======================================================================== :1~ S. A - 0 . o,: 0 . 0'1/. 0 . o\n,.: 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 .\n.~ J HOMES :JSF . 6 46. 2,~ 1 7. 7% 6 46.2% 0 . 0'1/. 13 5 1 5 0 11 -. .' .. B0'y E CLUB 0 . 0i. 0 . O 0 . 0 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 . -~, E . I. C 111 59. 7' 29 15. 6i. 43 23. 1' 3 1. 6 186 32 11 16 2 61 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=============================================================================== COMPARISON ===============================================================================c -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU #-STU # STU # STU ================================================================================ :,9 ::\u0026gt;. A C. 0 0 ,. 0 .0 '1/. 0 .0 i. 0 .0 'Y. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~v HOME SvSP. 3- 33. 3 ., - 0 0 i: 4 200.0 ,. 1- 100.0- 0 1- 0 3 1- 1 11 BOYS Ci_UB 0 0 i\n0 .0 i: 0 .0  0 .0 i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .:.: - 104 .0 ' 27 0 % 43 .0 ., ~ - --,. 3 .0 i. 177 ,. 15 14 43 3 53 17 EXc:,ULSION 0 .0 i. 0 0 /a 0 .0  0 .0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Date: 6/13/96 by School Time: 15: 56:45 From AUGUST Through MAY School: 048 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ================================================================================ 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 =================================================-==--========================== -----Br'.------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =================================-===============-=----====-------==-=========== :9 S. A. C. 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 . o~~ 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOtiE SUSF 1 50. Oi: 1 50.0i. 0 0 .,, . 0 .Oi: 2 1 1 0 0 2 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 01 0 .-0 0 0.,, . 0 . Oi. 0 0 0 o 0 0 i2 E. I. C. 4 44. 4t. 3 33. 3.,, . 0 22.21. 0 . Oi. 9 4 3 2 0 9 .:. / EXPULSION 0 . 0'1/. 0 . Oi. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----------------=---------=======-================--========--------=========== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 -----------------------------------===----=------------=====-------============= -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----------------------------------====-====-====-=---=========-===============- :l9 S. A (, 0 o,: 0 0% 0 o~: 0 Oi. 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 t-iOME SUSF. 3 42. 9% 4 57. 1 '1/.. 0 01 0 O'. 7 1 3 0 0 4 ..I.. .I. BOYS CL.UB 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 01 0 0 0 \"O 0 0 i2 i::. I. C 8i 66. 4'1/. 25 20. 5% 16 13. 1'1/. 0 01 1~2 46 18 9 0 73 17 EXPULSION 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 =-===::==============:\n:=========================================================a: COMPARISON ~~===~=====================================================================-=--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-)# REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -===--======================================================================--=== .)9 :::,. I... -~ 0 0 '1/. 0 0 t. 0 0 ,. - 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 : c._, HOMr: SiJSP. 2 200. 0\n,: 3 300. 0 .. ,. 0 0 I 0 0 '. 5 0 ,., C. 0 0 2 1. ~- BOVE CLUB 0 0 t. 0 0 I. 0 0 ., ,. 0 0 I 0 C, 0 0 0 0 '- .-:. E ! C 77 0 I. 22 0 '1/. 14 0 '1/. 0 0 '. 113 19 7 14 0 64 \"7 EXPULSION 0 0 ., ,. 0 0 t. 0 0 - 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ef: DIS032S 6/13/96 1me: 15: 56: 45 Analysis of Disciplinary Action~ by School From AUGUST Through MAY 049 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =============================================================================== 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 ================================================================================ -----B ti------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -=============================================================================== B. A. C. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0% 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOM::: SdSP. 0 . Oi\n0 . Oi\n0 .Oi: 0 . o~-\n0 0 0 0 0 0 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. .0 . 0% 0 . 0i~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. -. ,.~. .. 9 39. 1% 6 26. 1 '1/. 0 26. 1 /, 0 - 8. 7t. 23 .:! 4 5 2 14 EXPULSION 0 . Qi\n0 . 0'1/. 0 .Oi: 0 . 0i: 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=============-===============================================-================== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 -=============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ----=========-=========-========================================================== S. A ..-. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 !-iOi'E S:JSF. 8 40. 0'1/. 8 40. 0'1/. 3 15. o,: 1 5. 0'1/. 20 6 4 3 1 14 BDYS C ... UB 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E. l. r. '.., 79 54. 5'1/. 35 24. 1 '1/. 24 16. 61, 7 4. 8'1/. 145 32 13 10 4 59 EXPULSION 0 . Ot. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----===~=-------=============================================================== COMPARISON ----------------------=========================================================== -----BM------ -----BF'------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =----==~==-------------========================================================= ~- I-, C. 0 0 I. 0 0 I. 0 0 I. 0 0 t. 0 0 0 0 0 0\n_-,.,\nHC!r1E S\\..JSP. 8 800. 0 i~ a 800. 0 i: 3 300. 0 .,, . 1 100. 0 i: 20 6 a 3 1 14 BD\",.5 CL.VE 0 0 .,, . 0 0 i: 0 0 I, 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 - .,_ i:: ., - . - 70 0 i: 2Q 0 i~ 18 0 I, 5 0 I, 122 a 5 18 5 45 EXPULSION 0 0 '1/. 0 0 I, 0 0 t. 0 0 '1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 6/13/96 , .. me: 15: 56: 46 S:::::hool 050 Analysis of DisciplinaTy Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY ROSE CITY ANNEX ================================================================================ i 9 9 4 - 9 5 =~============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF ?CT/iOT # REF PCi/iOT * STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NEF----w REF\" ?CTiTOT ~ STU i\n-~~\n~\n===========o======_ 0%=====0======_ 01 =====0======_ 01 =====0======_ oi=====o 0 0 0 0 O 10 HOME SUSP. 5 55. 6% 2 22.2% 2 22.2% 0 .0% 9 4 2 2 0 8 ll BOYS CLUB O .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 .OX O .0% 0 .OX O .OX 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPU~SION O .0% 0 .0% 0 . 0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ================================================================================ 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 =~====~=======-==============================================--------============ -----BM------ # REr PCi/TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REr PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCi/TOT # STU ~~==~============================================================================ 5 P, --- 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 o: 0 o: 0 0 0 0 0 0 \"~ i-iOM:: 5.,_j5r=, C 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOYS CLUB 0 o : 0 o : 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :t 2 E. ~- C 0 0'1/. 0 ox 0 0'1/. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -. EXPU:._SIOi\\i 0 0'1/. 0 0'1/. 0 Oo/. 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --~~============================================================================= COMPARISON -= -:.\n:=====================-=========================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---==~=====~==~================================================================== -, S.\n.., C. 0 0 I. 0 0 % 0 0 X 0 0 lo 0 0 0 0 0 0 HOM~ susr._ 5- 100. 0 ., -.,'II. 2- 100. 0-1. 2- 100. 0-% 0 0 lo 9- 4- 2- 2- 0 8- l3 ClYi= c~uB 0 0 I. 0 0 I. 0 0 ., 0 0 .. I, 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 ,. - - '- 0 0 i: 0 0 i~ 0 0 i~ 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 DPULSIGN 0 0 i: 0 0 i: 0 0 .. 0 0 .. ,. ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 DISTRICT LEVEL NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 DISTRICT LEVEL Action 09: S.A.C. Action 10: Home Suspension 1,200 ..--------------~ 1,000 800 94-95 95-96 869 1,043 460 445 NBM 411 410 Action 11: Boys Club Suspension NBF 126 94-95~ 140 95-96L BM BF NBM 236 106 103 141 42 42 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class NBF 20 3 400 ,-----------------, 2,000 ,-----------------, 300 200 100 94-95 95-96 BM 133 371 BF 44 102 NBM 31 75 NBF 8 13 1,500 -- 1,000 BM 94-95 ii 178 95-96 =1 1,540 ------- BF NBM NBF 68 58 5 - --- ---- - 489 498 71 8 6 4 2 0 BM 94-95 7 95-96 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 DISTRICT LEVEL Action 17 Expulsion - - BF NBM NBF 0 1 0 1 0 2 R II 600 500 400 300 200 100 -94-95 95-96 510 470 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 HIGH SCHOOLS Action 09: SAC Action 10: Home Suspension ---- BF NBF -207 180 49 189 192 85 40 20 0 94-95~ 95-96C BM 80 20 BF NBM 12 36 7 4 Action 11: Boys Club Suspension Action 12 Elem Intervention Class NSF 4 2 250 ~------------~ 200 _,--,_ __ 150 BM BF NBM NBF 94-95 I\n- 89 21 9 5 95-96 207 41 36 7 0.8 ,___ ____________ - - - 0.6 ---------- - - - -- 0.4 --------- - - - - 0.2- 0--------------------' 94-95 95-96 0 0 BF 0 ----- 0 NBM 0 0 NBF 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 HIGH SCHOOLS Action 17 Expulsion 6~----------~ 5 4 3 2 0 94-951\\1 95-96nc- BM -5 2 --- - -- ___ __, BF NBM NSF 0 - 1 0 1 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Action 09: SAC Action 10: Home Suspension  600 ~------------~ 500 120 ..-----------------, 400 300 200 100 359 573 253 256 NBM 231 218 Action 11: Boys Club Suspension 77 -- 55 200..---------------, 150 - 100 94-95 i-L 95-96 BM 44 - 164 - - --- BF NBM NSF -23 22 3 61 39 6 100 80 60 40 20 0 Lliii-.1=::i__ BM 94-95 ~ 106 95-96 5 BF NBM 75 49 4 3 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 - - - -- - - - - NSF 15 0 0L-----------------' BM BF NBM NBF 94-95 J.\n- 0 ---- 0 - 0 -0 95-96 0 0 0 0 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 BM 94-95 2 95-96 0   NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Action 17 Expulsion -- -- BF NBM NBF 0 0 0 0 0 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 ELEMENTARY K-6 Action 09: SAC Action 10: Home Suspension 140.----------------~ 0.8 120 100 ~6 - 00 0.4 - - - -- -- - - 0.2 0'-----------------' 94-95 95-96 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 BM 0 0 BF 0 0 NBM 0 0 Action 11: Boys Club Suspension NBF 0 0 o~------------~ 94-95 95-96 BM BF 0 0 --+---- 0 0 NBM NBF 0 0 0 0 40 20 - 0 L....1111111111,1-..L-.E,,i\n,ZIIIL-.....L--14o1-....-'---------' BM BF NBM NBF 94-95ml 50 19 18 1 - 95-96r l 115 31 35 1 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class 2,000 .----------------~ 1,500 1,000 - 94-95il 95-s6n BM 178 1,539 BF - 68 489 NBM NBF 58 5 -- -- 498 71 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 ELEMENTARY K-6 Action 17 Expulsion o~----------~ 94-95 95-96 BM 0 0 BF 0 0 NBM NBF 0 0 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK-PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 5 YEAR TRENDS f'I( Jf~ 1111 .1l r I I r N)(:I, Pl If~,I ( SCIl UOI S I W~\u0026lt;:111\"'1/ \\f~/\\Y/' I l()f\\!f\nri \\( I /\\ I \u0026lt; I f) I f H t\nAction 09: Student Assignment Class (SAC) 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 ....__..........,.___ 91-920 92-93D - 93-94  --- 94-95  BM 700 920 977 869 95-96LJ 1,043 BF 328 - - - 486 - 529 -~ 460 445 NBM NBF 372 97 _,_ - - - -- - - - -- 492 158 c- - - -- 449 156 - - 4-11 - - 126 410 140 . - ... . ......,,_,,..._!lllllll!IJll ____ \"'l!lllllllllll!llll~l!lllll!l!!II.....-.----- Action 10: Home Suspensions 200 50 0 91-92fi) 92-93D 93-94  94-95  95-96D BM 65 134 231 236 141 BF NBM 24 23 69 58 60 76 106 103 42 42  NBF 2 14 22 -- - --- 20 -- 3 300 200 100 BM 91-920 224 92-930 2- 76 93-94  119 94-95 133 - 95-96n 371 - l( H~1 1111111l1,: or. I\\ FII FHI \u0026lt;:S CH()OLS u1(-\nc)1I1 lf \\J1\\nY/\\( j 1101\\lS r) YI /' I~ I rn I ,ff)~' Action 11: Boys Club BF NBM 70 66 -- -- - - - - - - - - 97 -- -8--7- 39 - - 39 44 31  NBF 11 -- - 10 -- - - 9 8 -- - - - -- - -- -- - - 102 75 13 1,l() I~ 1111 111 1l h'r lCI\\ I )I )[11.I C ~Cl lOUI S I W'1 ,WI 11\\1/\\l~/\\Y(' 11)(I ~~, r) YI /\\n i l\\f NI \")S Action 12: Elementary Assignment Class (E.I.C.) 2,000 ~--------------------~ 1,500 ----- ---- 1,000 500 BM BF NBM NSF 91-92 - 0 - - - --- 0 - - 0 - 0 92-93D 0 0 0 0 ---- -- --- -- - - - - - 93-94 168 - - 54 -- 45 - - 8 94-95  178 68 58 5 95-960 -- -- - - 1,540 489 498 71 I H) f\\ 11l I 111 1I f{ ( JC!\\ I 1[ IHI IC r~c1! 001S I qc.C\n11\" 1 I H\\/I\\ I? Y /\\ C I IOf \\JS r) YI /\\f~ l l~f [,,JU~\nAction 17: Expulsions a~-----------------------. 6 4 2 -- BM BF NBM NSF 91-92  4 1 0 0 92-93D -- - - - - ~- f- - - - - - - 6 3 1 0 93-9411 -- - - - - -- -- 6 4 3 0 94-95 ~--- - --- - - - 7 -- 0 - - -- -1 - - -0 95-96D 2 1 0 2\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_416","title":"Discipline, management report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1995/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline, management report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/416"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n1 Recidivism Report - Black/White Year: 96 Quarter: 1 Quarter: 4 Counts Each Student Once LEVEL Senior High Junior High \\ Elementary * O7.V ryKt-n, SCHOOL J CENTRAL /fair '/hall '/mcclella -'-MEIEa . PARKVIEW '/CLOVR JR 43UNBAR JFORST HT /hendersn y'MABEL JR /MANN M/S i/PULHTJ SOUTHWST ' BADGETT ^BALE BASELINE 'J BOOKER /BRADY /CARVER CHICOT f CLOVR EL Zdodd yFAIR PRK /FORST PK /FRANKLIN FULBRIGH ff'ednesday, July 28,1999 BM BE WM WF 145-} 118- 85 122 -|0 72 37 61 26 36 20 L} 52 , I 11 A 2 31- 129'3 113-' 151- 112'^ 98^' 60 91 159^' 7 20 11 25 17 9 38 2 3 15 10 45 26 3- 13 532- /()\u0026lt;* 91 17 13 48 32 52-^ 8(j7 1915 36 66 38 32 83 0 5 5 5 2 0 13 0 2 12 13 16 8 25 29 18 22  1 0 4 6 1 0 6 0 1 1 3 4 7 RECEIVED AUG 8 1989 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING OM OF Total 10 9 ! 5h 6 12 -y 13* 5 0 0 0- 0 0 a\u0026gt; 1 tr 27Q 215 154 15'/ 192 S! 4\n58 Senior High- 5 11^ 2 6 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 2 1 254 1 0 1 0 2 a 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 2^6 234 200 130 147 282  I lorHigh Junior Higl 1689 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 21 37 20 9 62 2 6 29 29 68 42 Page 1 of 2Recidivism Report - Black/White Year: 9 Quarter: 1 Quarter: 4 Counts Each Student Once LEVEL SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Elementary ''BARLAND / GEYERSP 11 21 , ) 26 6 5 1 2 0 0 35 31 2 3 0 0 'J GIBBS 8 4 5 1 0 0 18 yjEFFRSN / M L KING yMABEL EL 23 19 37 J MCDERMOT y^EADCLIF /mitchell 21 31 17 21 3 9 1 4 0 0 0 0 7 2 8 0 0 0 9 3 2 0 0 4 6 3 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 v/OTTER CR 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 VPUL HT E 36 10 55 RIGHTSEL 12 '^OCKFELR j(0MINE 12 12 -TERRY / WAKEFIEL 21 10 37 WASHNGTN x/WATSON '^WESTHIL 20 60 12 14 40 78 18 7 8 6 4 4 0 1 0 6 4 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 8 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 4 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 V WILLIAMS '^'WILSON 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 2 1 0 0 0 10 WOODRUFF Io 1 El\u0026lt;l^entarv Total lentai 13 849 3469 8 2 2 0 0 /7^ Wednesday, July 28,1999 Page 2 of 2 C-i (5 JI J ij I I School Mame__________ Central_________ J.A. Fair Han McCteMan_______ Metropolitan Parkview ALC____________ Ctoverdate Dunbar_________ Forest Heiphts _ Henderson______ Mabelvale______ Mann_________ Pula^ Heights Southwest Total*__________ Badgett ^le____________ Baseline________ Booker__________ Brady______ Carver_________ Chicot Enrolled 1591 805 828 904 S5S %BtKk 64.00 BM 201 72 67 80 52 Clovewlale Podd Fair Park Forest Partr Franklin Fuibrijhi Garland 608 732 759 792 491 847 781 ___612 10,104 210 347 327 604 394 028 452 453 294 270 435 ___431 516 255 87 80 76 78 74 S3 57 84 79 70 76 52 63 52 76 85 65 78 47 83 49 82 LMMo Rock School District DiselpMnafy Managamont Report 1MS-M School YearTotal SancUons Short Term ^utpanslon w M wF Annual Long Tenn Suspension Expulsion Total 238 152 197 22 42 107 269 221 261 249 210 95 __1 347 2,777 7 ' 31 12 43 21 11 80 83 86 43 72 15 15 31 146 68 72 136 86 50 55 172 1,143 42 36 27 22 ___3 14 23 40 56 32 64 47 52 23 45 526 16 14 11 r 1 4 24 17 7 7 18 __2 6 18 162 1 6 S 5 3 14 4 10 1 14 1 5 TOTAL 354 375 233 296 40 76 165 481 363 382 456 362 199 229 583 4606 6 39 21 59 25 ____11 113 0M 20 14 4 18 4 2 22 26 32 23 10 6 9 17 244 W 11 ___2 2 6 1 VAI V*F TOTAL 8M BF VAI 0 1 1 4 2 1 2 1 1 5 22 14 71 40 38 2 IS 18 23 11 6 1 2 4 9 10 2 1 4 I 1 2 6 40 40 105 62 46 1 2 12 4 1 1 13 2 ~8 60 3 2 3\" 5 1 1 1 1 27 1 4 1 44 18 8 27 S 2 ___28 40 35 43 35 23 8 12 21 3S5 0 d 2 __ 0 d 1 2 ____0 0 1 d ____i 0 d 3 9 2 10 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 39 7 1 1 WIF 1 TOTAL 4 9 3 11 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 1 402 402 244 336 47 82 196 524 399 439 494 387 207 241 611 5,011 ____8 39 23 59 2$ 12 115 0 8 41 40 107 __M 48 XB* 84 67M 64% 80% 84% 74% 64% 87% 81% 90% 85% 83% 74% 88% 88% 85% 86% 100% 78% 81% 86% 100% 63% _q% 88% 83% 80% 80% 82% 92% IC.: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT HEARING OFFICE 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FAX (501) 324-0536 DATE TO FROM SENDER'S PHONE # SUBJECT I q .\u0026lt;- l.(i COMMENTS Niin*v oi llne'u'l* T3 3Wd --------------- Myyvrif^------ . J \u0026lt;n H__ ^tr\u0026gt;ry,V^ rn^ -/ iJL fy _CLCiC\\uSi\u0026gt;L Fx Phor Nu/rtm 1 ri I gQ OdO 9NId^3H irGCiniS 6gLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF SANCTIONS OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD 1 2 2 062 040 105 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 5 Assault 2 010 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter Ref Ruis 1 1 030 062 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 PROSTAFF 2 090 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LeftSchl FAI LOSEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs FAILDET Smoking Tardies Assault Battery Fighting Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D RAPRINGS FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONSI Ueapon Gang Hen ROBBERY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 050 060 062 070 080 100 133 010 020 040 070 080 090 100 105 110 123 130 140 150 071 072 091 121 123 130 3 !, 2 1 7 1 11 2 7 33 15 1 8 1 3 4 2 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 95 4 1 4 1 1 24 1 35 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 1 8 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 35 2 1 1 2 9 1 1 1 1 12 7 1 45 22 2 6 2 2 8 2 5 4 1 2 1 1 7 5 1 1 9 1 52 27 2 1 1 8 3 1 1 2 1 51 10 3 5 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 146 23 7 30 13 7 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 11 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 168 1 1 34 k 3 1 12 2 1 1 3 36 2 1 10 1 60 30 2 1 1 20 1 1 2 1 1 1 2021 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 2 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT HinAlter Ref Ruis Smoking Orug/A 1 Drugs 1 Assault Battery Theft Fighting False Al Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONS1 Extort Other of 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 030 062 100 131 132 010 020 030 040 060 070 090 105 110 122 123 150 071 072 091 110 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Assault Battery Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS WEAPONS1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 062 080 090 010 020 040 090 100 105 110 123 150 091 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SLBTOTAL 1 1 8 1 7 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 1 1 3 25 22 1 3 5 71 2 6 4 1 1 3 8 2 3 30 201 1 8 6 2 26 1 4 2 1 1 3 12 93 2 3 33 28 1 5 5 97 3 10 6 2 1 3 9 5 3 42 294 7 1 4 11 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 1 15 2 1 1 4 42 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 2 4 37 30 1 5 5 1 1 11 1 2 3 1 1 1 15 1 2 4 48 31 1 7 8 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 3 18 n 22 1 9 3 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 110 1 22 1 1 1 1 132 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 10 6 1 1 2 1 1 3 12 6 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 1 8 1 1 1 1 50 2 8 3 12 7 1 1 2 1 1 It 13 7 k 2 58 60 29 11 40 4 4 3 3 1 1 337 65 402SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 10 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Fighting Other of CLASS K 2 2 4 010 040 000 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs Foul Lan Assault Fighting 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 040 060 062 070 110 010 040 1 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 6 1 2 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 10 Dishon. Assault Dis Cond UEAPONS1 1 2 2 3 010 010 110 091 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 5 5 1 2 1 2 5 1 2 1 3 2 1 7 Ref Ruis INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 062 105 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 5 2 2 1 5 2 2 1 5 Assault Theft INSUBORD Dis Cond 2 2 2 2 010 030 105 110 3 3 3 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 4 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 1 6 FORGERY Assault INSUBORD 1 2 2 140 010 105 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 HinAlter FAILOBEY Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Other of 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 k 030 060 110 010 030 040 090 105 000 2 1 1 7 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 8 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 8 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 8 3 2 3 2 1SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UM UF CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 19 1 20 3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 11 3 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT IM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 20 3 23 Fighting CLASS 07 2 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1  1 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond CLASS 08 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 43 5 48 10 1 11 48 11 59LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 12 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH. BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Tardies Assault Battery Fighting G anti ling Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D Drugs 2 Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 1 1 Z 2 2 Z z z z 2 Z Z Z 3 3 3 030 060 062 133 010 020 040 050 080 090 100 105 110 122 123 040 071 072 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL MinAlter Ref Ruis Smoking Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF Irxd Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging 0 AL-DRUGS Ass Staf Gang Hem 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z 2 2 3 3 030 062 100 133 010 020 030 040 050 070 080 090 100 105 110 123 150 071 123 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruts Tardies 1 1 1 1 030 060 062 133 2 5 1 23 4 6 1 34 2 2 1 82 3 1 1 2 12 4 1 1 2 1 36 4 2 2 72 1 1 1 1 1 8 1 9 2 23 1 5 4 13 2 1 26 1 1 1 1 2 5 2 31 k 6 1 1 KZ 2 Z Z 1 105 3 1 1 3 17 4 1 1 6 1 49 6 2 3 98 1 1 1 1 7 1 8 3 2 3 2 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 8 4 31 t, t, 1 1 43 2 Z Z 8 1 5 1 14 3 17 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 2 112 1 1 17 1 1 1 2 S !, 'i) It 7 1 1 48 3 2 3 1 1 2 129 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 18 1 1 1 2 1 7 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 25 1 1 1 1 4 2 6 1 1 2 3 11 3 2 3 14 1 1 1 1 1 3 17 5 1 1 6 1 49 12 2 3 2 3 112 2 2 2 1 6 1 1 9 2 26 3 3 2, 3 1 1 4 23 b 1 1 6 2 58 12 Z 5 ' Z 3 138 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 13 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D RAPRINGS FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONSI Extort Gang Hem 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z 3 3 3 3 3 010 020 030 040 050 090 100 105 110 122 123 130 140 150 071 072 091 110 123 6 1 13 3 3 28 4 1 2 2 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 67 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 5 3 6 1 1 1 20 _69 1 6 2 18 3 6 34 5 1 2 1 3 1 87 290 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 13 1 2 1 1 1 1 24 56 7 17 1 4 1 15 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 31 10 1 1 1 11 2 2 1 1 73 28 4 32 3 3 1 2 8 2 18 3 6 1 35 7 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 99 323 3 2 1 1 15 2 1 1 1 33 76 5 10 3 22 3 7 1 50 9 1 3 1 1 4 ' 1 1 2 1 1 132 399 1If? LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 14 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UH UF FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED-- TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Snxiking Foul Lan Drugs 1 Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Loiter PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Corx) Paging D RAPRINGS FIREUORK AL-DRUGS V As Sf In Riot 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 050 060 062 090 100 110 132 020 030 040 050 070 090 100 105 110 123 130 140 150 072 120 1 7 1 Zi, 1 2 6 3 14 2 13 1 61 4 5 1 10 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 1 161 1 4 5 1 10 11 16 3 1 52 2 7 1 28 1 2 11 4 24 2 4 24 1 77 7 5 1 1 10 1 213 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 1 11 1 1 5 1 9 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 9 2 20 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 7 4 4 4 4 2 7 1 28 1 1 11 3 4 24 2 4 24 2 77 7 5 1 1 10 2 (\u0026gt; 224 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 9 2 20 2 8 1 30 1 4 1* 3 4 25 2 25 2 86 7 1 1 10 .2 6 2!^ J HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs Smoking Foul Lan Drugs 1 Battery Theft Fighting Gaiit)ling Loiter PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 050 060 062 070 100 110 132 020 030 040 050 070 090 100 105 110 1 1 8 10 2 4 1 3 1 8 14 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 8 14 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 3 2 2 4 1 1 2 1 5 1 4 7 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 9 15 ]. 2 1 1 1 k 7 1 5 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 7 1 4 7 1 7 5SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 15 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS UEAPONSI In Riot Other of 2 2 2 3 3 t, 122 123 150 091 120 000 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 42 1 17 1 1 59 2 2 8 2 10 5 2 7 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 69 1 1 12 1 4 1 1 3 1 81 HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Theft Fighting Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Ueap 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 050 060 062 080 090 100 110 030 040 070 090 105 110 123 150 072 090 3 1 2 3 b 4 5 2 3 3 1 1 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL 1 35 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL J?? 2l#'\u0026gt; 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 17 86 2 5 2 2 5 8 7 1 6 2 3 I, 2 2 1 52 325 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 5 1 1 2 5 2 2 5 8 3 1 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 17 36 3 1 20 2 2 2 2 14 Kl 50 14 2 16 2 2 9 7 1 6 2 k It 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 3 6 10 9 1 7 2 6 2 5 4 3 3 2 1 56 1 20 2 2 76 350 52 402LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 3 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERN EXPELLED TOTAL Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting Dis Cond 2 2 040 110 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Loiter Hischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Smoke 2 Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Ueap 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 050 060 062 100 110 010 020 030 040 070 080 090 100 105 110 121 123 130 150 072 090 1 14 4 1 1 3 9 1 1 5 1 11 2 3 8 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 69 4 1 3 1 6 4 2 2 1 26 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Tardies Battery Theft Fighting Hischief PROSTAFF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 080 090 110 133 020 030 040 080 090 5 1 13 3 3 1 4 1 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 5 4 4 1 1 3 15 1 1 9 1 13 4 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 6 1 1 2 5 8 1 95 6 2 14 4 3 1 4 1 2 6 1 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 17 7 2 24 3 1 I, 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 5 4 4 1 3 3 15 1 1 9 1 13 6 1 3 1 6 1 2 1 2 21 6 10 k 1 3 3 15 1 2 11 1 14 5 1 8 2 1 101 6 2 14 4 3 1 4 2 2 6 1 8 2 4 2 24 1 1 1 1' 5 2 12 2 3 125 6 2 15 5 3 1 4 2 2 6 1 9LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 4 SCHOOL: 002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF SANCTIONS OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS UEAPONSI Ueapon 2 2 2 2 3 3 105 110 123 150 091 121 5 2 4 1 3 1 2 8 3 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 59 11 70 5 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 8 3 6 1 2 1 1 1 12 1 8 10 4 1 1 1 1 80 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Fighting Hischief PROSTAFF Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 050 060 062 110 010 040 080 090 110 123 150 072 2 2 It 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 It 2 4 1 1 It 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL 21 5 26 1 5 1 1 3 2 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 4 2 4 1 1 t, 2 2 2 3 1 1 27 2 2 2 1 1 8 I, 2 !, 1 1 k 4 It 2 5 2 2 35 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 152 I3C / 43 195 27 11 38 4 2 6 1 1 2 3 204 40 244LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 5 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 003 HANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging 0 AL-DRUGS Sale Ale 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 062 010 020 030 040 080 090 100 105 110 123 150 010 1 1 2 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL HinAlter LeftSchl Ref Ruis Ref Det Foul Lan FORGERY Assault Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 050 062 090 110 140 010 030 040 080 090 105 110 123 150 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL LeftSchl Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 050 062 080 090 110 010 030 040 080 090 100 105 110 1 3 15 4 9 1 34 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 17 1 2 1 2 2 1 b 1 2 IB 4 1 5 2 1 10 1 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 14 1 2 1 3 1 14 3 1 4 20 4 11 1 1 10 2 1 1 It 10 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 20 4 11 1 1 10 2 1 1 I, 2 2 44 20 20 1 2 1 2 1 46 2 20 2 1 1 30 2 5 1 15 1 1 2v 1 bb 3 1 8 2 1 2 1 3 5 1 3 1 31 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 9 1 1 2 32 1 5 5 1 1 3 1 8 2 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 5 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 14 2 14 31 2 14 8 1 9 2 1 1 2 1 6 1 6 1 3 1 2 1,5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 7 1 1 2 7 4 1 5 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 9 1 1 2 32 12 1 1 1 1 2 7 1 3 1 4 2 3 2 10 1 3 2 39 12LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC  PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 003 HANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH WF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Paging D RAPRINGS FIREUORK AL-DRUGS F1REARH1 UEAPONSI CLASS 09 2 2 2 2 3 3 123 130 140 150 081 091 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 6 SUBTOTAL 44 26 70 18 1 2 1 20 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 95 50 145 52 2 54 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 6 2 2 6 8 76 1 20 1 1 2 7 1 1 96 J 153 54 207 ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 7 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 004 METROPOLITAN VO-TECH ED CENTER SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED- TOTAL Foul Lan CLASS 05 1 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter Assault Fighting Gambling False Al PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Arson V As Sf Poss Gun Pos Ueap 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 010 040 050 060 090 105 110 123 150 060 072 080 090 2 2 1 1 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Fighting False Al INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS Extort 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 040 060 105 110 150 110 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL Harass LeftSchl Gambl i ng INSUBORD AL-DRUGS Pos Ueap 1 1 2 2 2 3 040 050 050 105 150 090 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 2 2 7 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 18 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 22 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 6 1 1 1 1 24 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 1 12 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 10 1 1 1 3 2 2 10 15 37 3 3 4 1 5 1 1 2 44 3 47LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 8 FROM DATE: DI SCIPL I HE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 005 PARKVIEW ARTS/SCIENCE MAGNET SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT HinAlter Ref Ruis Bus Regs FAILDET Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Drug/A 1 Assault Fighting Hischief AL-DRUGS Ass Staf WEAPONSI CLASS 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 070 080 090 100 110 131 010 040 080 150 071 091 1 3 1 3 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 11 2 4 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 24 LeftSchl Ref Ruis FAILDET Assault Theft fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 050 062 080 010 030 040 090 105 110 123 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 11 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 15 2 2 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 15 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 18 HinAlter LeftSchl Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Coom Paging D AL-DRUGS FIREARH1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 050 062 100 110 010 030 040 090 105 110 120 123 150 081 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL 1 3 5 1 3 1 2 4 1 1 1 5 9 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 9 1 4 1 1 1 1 20 11 31 5 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 33 2 1 1 7 1 1 4 1 1 1 6 10 1 6 2 1 1 3 1 40LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 9 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 005 PARKVIEW ARTS/SCIENCE MAGNET SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 42 15 OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT 57 UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 14 7 21 2 2 CP 2 61 21 82 4LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 22 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 012 HC CLELLAN HIGH SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 PROSTAFF 2 090 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs FAILDET Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Fighting Gambling Hischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond forgery Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Arson V As Sf Pos Ueap UEAPONS1 In Riot Gang Hem 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 030 050 060 062 070 080 090 100 110 010 020 040 050 080 090 105 110 122 123 130 150 060 072 090 091 120 123 1 10 13 6 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 5 7 3 1 1 2 15 20 9 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs FAILDET Ref Det Assault Battery Fighting Gantiling 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 070 080 090 010 020 040 050 6 1 6 10 39 5 1 5 1 9 1 1 11 4 1 4 12 1 1 11 50 9 2 5 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 116 16 6 1 1 1 1 2 6 4 46 162 3 3 1 1 1 1 8 2 10 1 1 1 1 9 4 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 15 20 9 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 12 1 1 11 51 15 2 5 1 13 1 1 1 1 3 2 181 1 2 1 2 1 4 11 2 16 22 9 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 12 1 1 12 53 16 2 5 1 17' 1 1 1 1 3 2 192 1 5 1 3 1 3 1 21 7 1 4 1 2 2 9 4 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 21 7 1 4 1 3 4 9 4 4 1 1 1 25 7 1 4 2 3 9 4SCHOOL: 012 MC CLELLAN HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 23 discipline by reason code 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Hischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONSI In Riot Ueapon Gang Hem 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 080 090 105 110 122 123 130 150 071 072 091 120 121 123 1 4 8 2 1 2 3 5 10 1 2 1 2 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs FAILDET SnoKing Foul Lan Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf In Riot Gang Hem 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 060 062 070 080 100 110 020 030 040 050 080 090 105 110 123 150 071 072 120 123 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 11 57 20 77 9 5 14 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 87 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 16 1 5 8 12 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 103 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 3 2 1 2 24 197 2 1 1 4 72 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 2 1 28 269 1 1 1 1 5 5 -22. 7 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 34 2 1 1 5 1 3 1 1 1 ' 2 2 1 1 8 2 1 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 39 18 6 24 2 1 3 0 11 304 32 336 ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 28 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan FORGERY Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Ueap UEAPONSI 1 11 1 12 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 3 3 3 030 060 062 110 140 020 030 040 080 090 100 105 110 122 123 150 072 090 091 9 4 6 6 21 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Smoke 2 Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 22 22 22 3 3 UEAPONSI 3 030 060 062 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 121 122 123 150 071 072 091 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL MinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Bus Regs 1 11 1 1 030 050 060 062 070 21 25 3 21 24 14 2 2 12 1 96 2 3 10 1 1 8 1 24 14 1 1 1 2 2 1 72 3 14 12 21 5 1 12 53 4 2 6 10 1 12 13 1 2 51 2 6 5 15 6 11 12 1 2,7 3 2 1 45 19 3 3 21 149 65 16 1 1 18 2 36 27 12 14 2 1 123 5 20 17 1 1 1 2 2 5 1 11 5 2 19 3 31 1 2 1 4 3 2 5 1 1 3 7 1 2 1 4 5 1 1 12 1 2 1 1 11 5 2 23 3 31 1 5 33 1 7 1 1 4 2 1 3 21 1 9 3 5 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 15 6 7 1 1 71 37 3 21 47 20 3 3 2 1 2 159 6 5 16 3 61 19 2 36 27 12 1 4 2 12 134 5 20 17 1 1 4 1 5 1 13 1 2 1 1 11 5 2 23 3 3 1 1 15 6 81 172 41 3 31 52 20 3 3 2121 172 6 6 18 3 62 20 2 47 32 1 21 6 2 12 157 5 3 23 18 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/03/96 EXPELLED 06/27/96 PAGE TOTAL 29 UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILDET Smoking Foul Lan FORGERY Assault Battery Fighting Hischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Smoke 2 Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Arson Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 080 100 110 140 010 020 040 080 090 105 110 121 122 123 150 060 071 072 1 1 5 1 37 18 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 2 9 1 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 101 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 269 9 2 12 7 44 148 1 1 1 1 14 1 2 49 25 1 2 2 4 145 417 1 2 3 4 2 16 40 1 9 1 1 13 1 2 13 24 29 64 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 14 26 1 5 1 1 3 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 \u0026lt;) 14 1 2 50 27 1 2 4 1 1 It 165 1 3 1 13 1 2 30 12 38 2 2 3 3 458 66 1 1 1 1 2 10 17 1 3 63 28 1 2 2 1 1 4 195 524SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 16 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis CLASS 04 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis CLASS 05 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Battery Theft Fighting Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D FIREUORK AL-DRUGS V As Sf In Riot Gang Mem 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 030 050 060 062 080 020 030 040 070 080 090 105 110 123 140 150 072 120 123 6 1 1 6 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Smoking Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Loiter PROSTAFF Ind Exp IMSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 090 100 010 020 030 040 050 070 090 100 105 110 123 150 071 4 3 16 1 3 9 42 3 1 2 1 99 2 4 14 1 1 2 13 2 2 16 4 10 5 1 4 2 1 1 5 10 1 22 1 4 1 1 1 7 5 3 1 7 2 1 8 1 4 3 17 1 3 14 52 3 1 2 1 1 121 3 4 18 1 1 2 2 1 20 2 2 21 4 13 5 2 k 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 6 1 1 1 1 3 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 15 2 1 2 2 17 1 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 7 2 1 8 1 5 3 17 1 3 14 53 6 1 2 1 2 1 2 130 2 2 3 7 1 1 1 1 18 9 2 1 8 1 5 3 19 1 6 14 60 7 2 3 1 3 1 2 148 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 18 1 1 3 3 1 20 2 2 22 5 13 7 2 5 1 1 2 1 2 4 4 20 1 1 3 4 1 20 2 2 22 5 15 7 2 5  1SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 17 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT V As Sf In Riot CLASS 08 3 3 072 120 1 1 1 1 2 SUBTOTAL 81 25 106 4 1 5 8 2 10 1 1 1 12 1 12 4 1 118 6 4 1 124 HinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Foul Lan Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond forgery Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Ueap Extort Gang Hem 1 11 11 1 12 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 33 030 050 060 062 090 110 133 010 020 030 040 050 080 090 100 105 110 122 123 130 150 071 072 090 110 123 31 1 71 1 2 2 12 2 11 14 15 14 3 21 15 4 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 1 1 95 1 1 1 1 7 10 k 12 81 1 2 2 13 2 18 14 25 1 4 1 1 5 2 1 24 2 2 3 3 AL-DRUGS 2 150 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter Smoking 1 1 Drug/A 1 1 Dis Cond Paging D 2 2 030 100 131 110 123 1 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 3 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 281 16 3 211 5 3 2 1 4 2 5 11 119 12 4 16 1 1 1 1 1 11 3 15 2 2 19 1 1 1 1 4 15 2 2 2 1 1 2 20 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 12 81 122 16 2 18 2 4 25 1 17 1 2 1 15 1 10 3 1 4 141 1 5 2 1 1 4 2 2 18 4 1 3 13 1 3 22 16 2 18 25 26 1 21 7 2117 1 12 3 14 159 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 353 J2 3^ 7 3') 32 7 39 4 4 4 396 43 439 SCHOOL: 013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 24 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT HinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Snok i ng Foul Lan Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp Dis Cond Har Coon Forgery RAPRINGS FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Ueap UEAPONSI Gang Hem 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 23 3 3 33 030 040 050 060 062 080 100 110 133 010 020 030 040 090 100 110 120 122 130 140 150 071 072 090 091 123 17 1 2 8 24 1 1 9 911 18 17 4 1 26 23 26 41 1 1 13 1 4 3 2 2 1 2 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan FORGERY Assault Theft 1 11 11 11 1 2 2 Fighting 2 Gambling Hischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp Dis Cond Forgery 2 Z 1 2 Z 2 030 040 050 060 062 100 110 140 010 030 040 050 080 090 100 no 122 1 1 5 3 3 2 1 2 1 41 10 4 5 22 2 3 2 14 1 1 3 1 1 95 66 6 1 40 11 2 1 1 17 12 2 10 1 2 1 1 5 4 3 13 6 19 3 21 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 161 18 1 2 50 12 4 1 11 11 12 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 18 3 21 4 2 6 1 1 1 1 11 2 1 2 1 12 2 12 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 1 3 11 1 1 26 23 26 41 11 13 1 15 3 13 6 1 9 3 2 113 2 21 1 168 18 1 2 50 12 5 1 1 1 1 1 15 5 33 2 1 21 1 2 1 1 22 2 1 12 2 1 1 1 1 5 1 31 26 29 43 1 2\u0026lt; 15 2 163 15 6193 211 U 12 21 1 190 20 1 1 2 62 3 2 1 61 1 11 1 2 20 1 SCHOOL: 013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSHRC PAGE 25 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT RAPRINGS Pos Ueap UEAPONSI Assembly Gang Hem 2 3 3 3 3 130 090 091 122 123 3 3 1 1 2 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF Ind Exp Dis Cond Forgery Paging 0 RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Gang Hem ROBBERY 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 040 050 060 062 080 100 110 010 020 030 040 050 090 100 110 122 123 130 150 071 072 123 130 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 67 34 1 101 22 2 24 1 4 9 2 1 4 11 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 6 113 27 3 2 2 1 6 140 1 4 1 23 1 3 7 2 1 3 2 6 1 21 1 7 1 1 1 87 249 1 8 1 1 1 6 1 6 1 8 1 1 36 136 1 1 4 1 31 1 4 8 2 9 3 12 29 1 1 8 1 1 1 123 385 3 3 5 5 1 1 4 1 31 1 3 5 4 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 24 64 1 1 2 7 5 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 4 2 26 71 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 4 11 4 2 9 3 13 3 31 1 5 2 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 10 23 3 7 1 1 1 1 13 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 2 2 2 2 137 2 27 1 1 7 1 36 1 5 k 13 5 2 11 It \\lt 3 36 1 2 1 8 2 2 2 2 164 5 5 3 3 418 76 494SCHOOL: 016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL OUT Of SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF little rock school district FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 30 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT HinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D Pos Ueap 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 040 050 060 062 110 030 040 090 105 110 123 090 11 1 11 22 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 22 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL Dishon. HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Drugs 1 Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUSORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONS1 Weapon Other of 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 010 030 060 062 110 132 133 010 020 030 040 090 100 105 110 123 150 071 072 091 121 000 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Drug/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 030 060 062 100 110 131 6 12 4 2 11 2 2 1 1 53 1 19 3 18 5 1 1 1 10 1 4 3 9 1 2 1 80 9 13 25 4 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 20 8 8 2 5 2 6 1 1 33 8 4 1 9 13 4 2 12 2 4 3 1 73 1 27 3 26 5 3 1 1 15 1 4 5 15 2 3 1 113 17 13 29 4 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 22 3 2 9 1 15 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 6 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 25 1 5 8 1 9 3 1 13 28 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 6 1 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 9 13 4 2 12 2 6 3 2 76 1 27 3 26 5 3 1 3 1 15 1 4 5 17 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 123 17 13 30 4 3 1 7 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 25 1 5 8 1 9 3 1 28 3 3 29 2 1 9 16 5 3 15 3 3 9 4 2 101 1 28 8 34 5 3i 1 1 3 1 24 4 4 5 18 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 151 20 13 30 4 6 1LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 31 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Tardies Battery Theft Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Ueap Ueapon Other of 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 133 020 030 040 050 090 100 105 110 123 150 072 090 121 000 1 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 2 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 1 2 12 2 1 1 77 210 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 3 23 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 6 33 86 110 296 1 1 1 10 47 3 19 1 1 1 13 66 1 1 1 5 10 3 4 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 11 13 23 J) 1 1 1 2 1 3 27 2 1 2 1 2 1 121 320 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 67 1 3 2 7 1 3 1 4 28 2 2 2 2 2 1 135 387SCHOOL: 010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 18 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS -LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Pos Ueap 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 110 010 030 040 100 105 110 123 150 090 2 2 10 1 9 4 1 1 3 2 4 1 1 1 7 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 30 1 12 17 1 10 4 1 1 1 42 1 3 1 2 10 3 3 1 1 1 1 6 1 2 13 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 17 2 10 k 1 1 1 44 1 6 1 2 13 4 1 4 1 1 1 23 2 11 1 57 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Hischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS V As Sf UEAPONSI 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 060 062 090 010 020 030 040 050 080 090 105 110 122 123 130 150 072 091 3 5 3 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 040 060 062 010 020 030 040 080 1 2 2 14 1 4 15 11 1 1 1 1 65 5 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 3 6 2 1 1 21 2 7 1 4 5 4 1 2 2 2 17 1 1 1 21 13 1 2 1 1 1 86 5 1 1 2 3 9 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 1 2 2 1 2 4 2 1 2 2 2 2 4 5 I, 1 2 3 2 17 1 1 1 22 14 1 2 1 1 1 1 90 5 1 1 2 2 1 3 9 1 1 2 2 5 2 2 6 k 1 2 3 k 19 1 1 7 22 14 1 2 1 1 1 1 95 5 1 1 2 2 1 5 11 1SCHOOL: 010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH OUT Of SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSHRC (ib/n/\u0026lt;)b PAGE 19 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Ueap CLASS 09 2 22 2 2 22 3 3 3 090 100 105 110 123 140 150 071 072 090 19 5 3 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1,1, 2 2 8 1 21 Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 10 2 2 2 2 040 090 105 110 3 SUBTOTAL 2 16 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 145 )5H 55 27 6 3 2 1 1 1 65 3 12 17 200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 2 23 6 I 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 29 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 1 3 6 12 28 63 21 12 1 71 1 2 1 1 212 7 1 1 11 1 11 29 4 1 29 7 42 2 121 82 3 12 17 241 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 26 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 014 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL Fighting CLASS 04 2 040 SUBTOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Harass Ref Ruis Ref Det Saioking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf 1 1 1 11 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 040 062 090 100 110 010 020 030 040 080 090 105 110 140 150 071 1 5 1 21 1 3 6 1 3 6 5 5 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Dis Cond Paging D Ass Staf Extort In Riot Ueapon Gang Mem 1 1 1 1 112 2 2 2 2 2 2 23 3 3 3 3 040 060 062 090 100 110 010 020 030 040 080 090 110 123 071 110 120 121 123 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis 1 1 1 040 060 062 1 1 11 2 2 1 1 15 2 10 1511 1 35 1 6 2 1 1 2 81 12 3 1 2 40 1 1 4 1 1 2 10 16 2 11 171 11 45 2 2 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 9 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 21 162 12 171 14 50 5 2 1 1 9 1 3 6 5 2 21 16 2 14 1 8 12 4 59 J 1 1 1 1 3 9 2 1 8 1 8 9 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 4 4 1 1 16 2 12 1 16 4 2 2 56 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 1 2 2 13 4 17 2 1 1 8 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 10 3 1 4 1 1 2 3 22 13 2 17 4 2 31 1 1 2 67 1 8 1 1 6 3 21 1 1 9 3 8' 23 22 14 3 23 72 3 1 11 2 88 1 14 1 1 4 SCHOOL: 014 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 27 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Battery Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond RAPRINGS Ass Staf V As Sf Extort 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 090 100 110 020 040 090 100 105 110 130 071 072 110 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 4 4 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 8 4 1 1 6 2 2 10 6 1 1 6 1 1 2 2 32 107 5 31 37 138 1 1 23 4 27 1 1 1 1 2 1 10 2 1 10 3 4 10 7 1 1 7 1 2 2 1 47 1 1 2 1' 3 4 10 7 1 1 7 1 2 2 1 48 22 2 24 3 1 4 2 1 3 165 31 196SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE , BH BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 32 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE\n6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Foul Lan 1 1 060 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Ind Exp Har Conn 1 1 1 2 2 2 030 060 062 040 100 120 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 2 4 1 2 1 11 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 1 13 2 3 4 1 2 1 13 2 3 4 1 2 1 13 Ref Ruts Fighting 1 2 062 040 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 5 5 1 1 1 5 6 1 5 6 1 5 6 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Fighting 1 1 1 2 060 062 110 040 1 3 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 3 7 1 1 3 1 3 8 1 3 1 3 8 1 3 1 3 8 Ref Ruis Fighting Hischief INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 2 062 040 080 105 110 3 1 2 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 6 1 1 4 1 4 1 3 1 10 1 4 1 3 1 10 1 4 1 3 1 10 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 31 8 39 39 39LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 33 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Bus Regs CLASS K 1 1 060 070 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Foul Lan 1 110 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis Assault Dis Cond 1 2 2 062 010 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Harass Ref Ruts Foul Lan Fighting Pos Ueap 1 1 1 2 3 040 062 110 040 090 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 Ref Ruis Fighting 1 2 062 040 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 FAILOBEY Foul Lan Fighting Mischief Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 060 110 040 080 110 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 21 3 24 1 1 24 1 25SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/03/96 EXPELLED 06/27/96 PAGE TOTAL 34 Ref Ruis CLASS 02 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Dis Cond CLASS 04 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 2 040 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Fighting CLASS 06 2 040 SUBTOTAL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 7 7 1 1 7 1 8LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 35 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL Fighting 2 040 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 Theft CLASS 2 030 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis fighting INSUBORO 1 2 2 062 040 105 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 2 4 6 6 6SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 36 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF  UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis CLASS K 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ind Exp INSUBORD CLASS 02 2 2 100 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 V As Sf 3 072 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY 1 060 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 FAILOBEY INSUBORD Paging D 1 2 2 060 105 123 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 4 1 7 2 4 1 7 2 4 1 7 2 4 1 7 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 11 11 1 1 12 12SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 37 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis Assault CLASS K 1 2 062 010 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 FAILOBEY CLASS 01 1 060 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Foul Lan Theft 1 2 110 030 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ref Ruis Foul Lan Dis Cond Ass Staf 1 1 2 3 062 110 110 071 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 6 Ref Ruis Assault Pos Ueap 1 2 3 062 010 090 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 Ref Ruis Paging D V As Sf 1 2 3 062 123 072 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 HinAlter Harass Theft 1 1 2 030 040 030 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 12 5 17 4 4 1 1 1 1 18 5 23SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 38 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis INSUBORD CLASS K 1 062 2 2 , 105 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 Ref Ruis Assault INSUBORD CLASS 01 1 Z Z 062 010 105 '1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 z 1 4 Ref Ruis Ref Det Assault PROSTAFF Dis Cond 1 1 2 Z 2 062 090 010 090 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL Z 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 7 2 1 1 1 2 7 2 1 1 1 2 7 Ref Ruis Assault Dis Cond 1 2 2 062 010 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 3 2 6 1 1 2 1 4 3 8 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 8 1 1 2 4 3 9 Ref Ruis Bus Regs Assault Fighting 1 1 2 2 062 070 010 040 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 1 2 7 It 1 1 Z 8 4 1 1 2 8 4 1 1 2 8 Foul Lan PROSTAFF Dis Cond Paging D 1 2 2 2 110 090 110 123 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 2 1 5 Ref Ruis Assault Fighting PROSTAFF 1 2 Z 2 062 010 040 090 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 2 5 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 22 15 37 2 1 3 1 1 38 3 41LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 39 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF FAILOBEY 1 060 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter FAILOBEY Theft PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 030 090 100 105 110 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 5 2 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 7 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 9 PROSTAFF Dis Cond 2 2 090 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Fighting Dis Cond Har Comm FIREUORK 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 110 040 110 120 140 1 1 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 4 2 5 1 1 2 1 1 13 3 6 1 2 3 1 1 17 1 1 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 1 1 17 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 1 2 18 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault PROSTAFF Dis Cond 1 1 1 2 2 2 060 062 110 010 090 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 3 5 1 2 3 1 5 5 1 5 3 1 3 1 1 1 10 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 14 18 32 4 4 8 32 8 40SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 40 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Harass INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS K 1 2 2 040 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 FAILOBEY Assault Theft PROSTAFF Paging D 1 2 2 2 2 060 010 030 090 123 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 6 Ref Ruts Assault Fighting INSUBORD 1 2 2 2 062 010 040 105 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 3 4 1 9 2 2 1 3 6 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 3 6 1 11 1 1 1 3 7 1 12 Assault Battery Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Pos Ueap 2 2 2 2 2 3 010 020 040 105 110 090 1 1 3 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 2 1 8 1 3 1 6 2 1 4 3 3 1 14 2 1 4 3 3 1 14 2 1 4 3 3 1 14 HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Fighting Hischief Ind Exp INSUBORD Paging D FIREUORK Ass Staf 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 062 010 040 080 100 105 123 140 071 2 2 1 6 5 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 7 1 5 3 4 1 4 1 2 2 1 7 1 5 3 4 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 18 3 21 1 1 1 1 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 22 1 1 7 2 2 1 11 2 5 3 1 1 1 29 HinAlter Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 062 110 010 020 030 040 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 5LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 41 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED t TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging 0 UEAPONSI 2 2 2 2 2 3 090 100 105 110 123 091 1 1 2 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 19 2 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 23 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 23 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 25 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Conan Paging 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 040 105 110 120 123 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 ! CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 8 2 2 1 1 1 8 1 2 1 5 3 1 1 2 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 3 2 1 Z 17 1 1 1 2 1 5 3 2 1 2 18 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 71 23 94 9 2 11 2 2 96 11 107SCHOOL: 026 GARLAND INCENTIVE SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 i PAGE 42 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT HinAlter CLASS K 1 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter Ref Ruis 1 1 030 062 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 HinAlter Ref Ruis Theft Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 062 030 040 100 110 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 4 4 1 12 1 1 1 4 4 1 12 1 1 1 4 4 1 12 1 1 1 4 1 12 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD WEAPONSI 1 1 1 2 2 3 030 060 062 040 105 091 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 8 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond RAPRINGS FIREWORK Pos Weap 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 010 030 040 090 105 110 130 140 090 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 17 5 22 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 23 1 3 7 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 26 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 38 6 44 2 2 4 1 1 45 4 49LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 43 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL I SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT INSUBORD CLASS K 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter Foul Lan FIREUORK 1 1 2 030 110 140 2 2 2 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 HinAlter Fighting 1 2 030 040 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 062 040 105 110 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 4 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 HinAlter Battery PROSTAFF INSUBORD 1 2 2 2 030 020 090 105 2 2 2 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 9 4 13 5 1 6 1 1 14 6 20LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 44 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE FROM DATE: 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERN EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS K 1 2 2 062 105 110 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fitting Hischief Ind Exp Dis Cond Ass Staf 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 010 030 040 080 100 110 071 1 1 1 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Ast Staf 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 062 110 010 040 105 110 071 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting Ind Exp INSUBORD Ass Staf 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 062 010 030 040 100 105 071 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL Hir*lter 1 Ref Ruis I 1 Theft Fitting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 062 030 040 090 105 110 123 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 2 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 2 1 4 1 12 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 7 1 1 1 1 13 1 2 1 7 1 1 3 4 3 1 1 1 3 2 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 11 1 3 2 1 2 4 1 1 15 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 !, 1 1 15 t, 2 1 1 1 2 1 12 1 1 2 1 1 1 !\u0026gt; 1 1 2 i\u0026gt; Z 1 17 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 13LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 45 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Battery Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging 0 V As Sf 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 3 030 062 010 020 040 080 090 105 110 123 072 11 7 2 1 1 12 7 2 1 1 1 12 7 2 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 2 1 1 29 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 31 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 31 1 2 13 7 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 33 HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Battery Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUeORD Dis Cond Paging 0 Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 010 020 040 090 100 105 110 123 071 072 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 11 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 80 1 1 2 1 5 14 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 94 14 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 17 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 18 5 19 1 1 2 96 19 115SCHOOL: 029 WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 46 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis Dis Cond CLASS K 1 2 062 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond UEAPONSI 2 3 110 091 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD UEAPONSI 1 1 2 Z 3 060 062 040 105 091 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 Fighting Dis Cond Paging D 2 2 2 040 110 123 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 ! 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD 1 1 2 2 2 060 062 040 090 105 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 1 2 1 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 14 4 18 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 4 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 19 3 22SCHOOL: 030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF Ref Ruis 1 062 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 47 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT BH TOT BF BLK TOT UH WF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 HinAlter Bus Regs 1 1 030 070 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 3 3 4 1 5 4 1 5 4 1 5 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 3 3 6 6 6SCHOOL: 032 DODO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UEAPONSI 3 091 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 48 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM HF UHT [TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Assault Dis Cond RAPRINGS 1 2 2 2 060 010 110 130 1 3 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 5 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 7 1 3 2 1 7 1 3 2 1 7 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 5 2 7 1 1 7 1 8LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 49 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 033 MEADOUCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis INSUBORD Pos Ueap CLASS 02 1 2 3 062 105 090 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 5 2 2 1 5 2 2 1 5 2 2 1 5 INSUBORD Dis Cond 2 2 105 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Z 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FORGERY Assault Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 060 062 140 010 040 090 105 110 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 It 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 9 2 1 1 11 1 2 1 Z 1 1 11 1 1 2 Z 1 1 1 4 1 1 Z 13 HinAlter FAILOBEY Assault Fighting Hischief 1 1 Z 2 2 030 060 010 040 080 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Z 1 1 1 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 3 2 5 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 Ref Ruis Assault INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 062 010 105 110 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 It 2 1 8 1 t, Z 1 8 2 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 27 4 31 2 2 6 9 2 2 6 9 1 It 2 1 8 2 2 2 6 3 4 4 3 14 31 9 40SCHOOL: 034 MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UM UF little rock school district FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 50 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault INSUBORD Ass Staf Pos Ueap CLASS K 2 2 3 3 010 105 071 090 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 Theft INSUBORD 2 2 030 105 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Assault INSUBORD Dis Cond 2 2 2 010 105 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 It 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 3 INSUBORD Dis Cond Arson Pos Ueap 2 2 3 3 105 110 060 090 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 6 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 8 1 4 2 1 8 Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Ass Staf 2 2 2 2 3 010 040 105 110 071 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 2 3 4 1 11 1 2 3 1 11 1 2 3 4 1 11 1 2 3 4 1 11 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 27 2 29 1 1 1 1 2 31 1 32LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 51 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 035 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. ELEMENTARY SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis UEAPONSI CLASS K 1 3 062 091 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Harass Ref Ruis Ref Det Assault Fighting Paging D 1 1 1 2 2 2 040 062 090 010 040 123 1 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 ReF Ruis Pos Ueap 1 3 062 090 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Fighting PROSTAFF Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 010 040 090 110 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 6 6 1 4 1 4 6 1 4 1 1 1 5 1 1 10 Ref Ruis Fighting 1 2 062 040 1 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 12 2 14 11 11 14 11 25 I I ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 52 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 036 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL -LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL Dis Cond CLASS K 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Ref Ruis 1 062 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL FAILOBEY 1 060 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Harass 1 040 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 062 040 105 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 Foul Lan Hischief 1 2 110 080 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 8 8 3 2 5 8 5 13 I ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 53 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM- EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Dis Cond CLASS K 1 2 060 110 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 4 5 FAILOBEY Ind Exp Dis Cond 1 2 2 060 100 110 1 1 2 1 1 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 2 3 1 2 4 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 5 3 3 2 1 5 8 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault UEAPONSI 2 3 010 091 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 030 062 010 110 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 4 5 1 1 1 5 8 1 1 1 5 8 1 1 1 5 8 HinAlter 1 030 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault PROSTAFF Dis Cond RAPRINGS V As Sf 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 010 090 110 130 072 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 7 17 10 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 4 2 6 1 7 2 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 13 27 5 6 11 1 1 28 11 39SCHOOL: 038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM. BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 54 01 SCIPL I HE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Fighting Dis Cond 1 2 2 060 040 110 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 7 1 1 1 3 4 8 Fighting Dis Cond UEAPONSI 2 2 3 040 110 091 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 Fighting Dis Cond 2 2 040 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 5 4 9 5 4 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 4 9 1 1 2 6 5 11 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 060 062 040 110 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 2 6 9 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 7 13 1 1 1 1 4 8 14 Harass Ref Ruis Assault Battery Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 040 062 010 020 040 105 110 123 3 2 1 5 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 11 2 3 1 3 1 5 13 1 1 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 3 1 1 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 14 2 1 6 1 4 1 1 4 1 7 1 20 Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond Har Coran 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 040 060 062 040 100 110 120 1 3 8 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 3 12 2 29 2 1 3 1 3 8 2 3 13 2 32 2 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 68 9 77 3 3 5 5 1 3 8 2 3 13 2 32 2 3 5 1 5 8 2 3 16 2 37 14 1 15 1 1 1 1 78 16 94LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 55 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 039 RIGHTSELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BN BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Ref Ruis CLASS K 1 1 060 062 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 I Ref Ruis False Al 1 2 062 060 1 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ref Ruis RAPRINGS 1 2 062 130 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ass Staf 3 071 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Fighting 1 1 1 1 2 050 060 062 110 040 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 3 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 8 4 12 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 3 3 3 3 12 3 15LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 56 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 040 ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF FAILOBEY 1 060 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL Fighting 2 040 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 OUT OF SCHOOL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Fighting 2 040 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Fighting Ind Exp 1 2 2 060 040 100 2 2 2 2 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 2 4 3 1 4 2 5 1 8 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 6 1 7 5 2 7 7 7 14SCHOOL: 042 WASHINGTON MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 57 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Battery Ind Exp CLASS K 2 2 2 010 020 100 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 2 3 4 1 2 7 Assault Battery Ass Staf CLASS 01 2 2 3 010 020 071 2 2 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 5 Assault Battery Ind Exp Dis Corid UEAPONSI 2 2 2 2 3 010 020 100 110 091 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 7 1 3 5 1 2 1 1 10 Assault Battery RAPRINGS Arson Ass Staf 2 2 2 3 3 010 020 130 060 071 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 7 Assault Battery Fighting 2 2 2 010 020 040 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 Ref Ruis Assault Battery Ind Exp Ass Staf 1 2 2 2 3 062 010 020 100 071 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 3 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 6 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 8 Battery 2 020 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 19 5 24 6 5 11 7 1 8 2 1 3 32 14 46LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 58 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL Ref Ruis CLASS 03 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 59 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 044 WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF WEAPONS1 3 091 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 Assault WEAPONS1 2 3 010 091 1 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Battery Fighting INSUBORD 2 2 2 020 040 105 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 , 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 7 1 8 1 1 2 10 10LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 60 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 045 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ass Staf CLASS K 3 071 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault INSUBORD Dis Cond FIREUORK 2 2 2 2 010 105 110 140 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 2 4 1 4 11 1 1 3 4 1 4 12 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 4 13 1 1 Assault Ass Staf 2 3 010 071 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 12 2 14 2 1 3 1 1 15 3 4 4 1 4 13 1 1 2 1 3 18LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 61 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERN' EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Dis Cond CLASS 01 2 2 010 110 SUBTOTAL 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Ref Ruis Assault Dis Cond CLASS 02 1 2 2 062 010 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 4 6 1 1 4 6 1 1 It b 1 1 4 6 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 030 040 090 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 2 5 1 4 1 14 1 1 1 2 6 1 4 1 15 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 6 1 1 15 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 6 1 U 18 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Dis Cond 1 1 1 2 2 030 060 062 040 110 2 2 2 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis Assault Fighting AL-DRUGS 1 2 2 2 062 010 040 150 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis Assault Fighting Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 062 010 040 110 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 8 2 2 2 6 1 1 2 35 1 1 2 1 3 4 9 3 3 2 8 1 1 3 1 6 44 5 2 2 2 2 2 7 3 3 2 8 2 2 3 3 2 2 10 1 1 3 1 6 1 1 3 1 6 44 7 51LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 62 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 047 TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Harass Assault Theft UEAPONSI 1 2 2 3 040 010 030 091 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 4 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 4 1 7 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis PROSTAFF INSUBORD 1 1 2 2 060 062 090 105 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 6 1 3 1 1 6 1 3 1 1 6 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF UEAPONSi 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 040 080 090 091 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 040 105 110 4 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 3 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 9 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 12 HinAlter Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Fighting PROSTAFF 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 INSUBORD . 2 Dis Cond Har Conn Paging D UEAPONSI Ueapon CLASS 06 2 2 2 3 3 030 040 060 062 010 040 090 105 110 120 123 091 121 1 1 2 3 2 2 SUBTOTAL 11 1 2 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 3 1 18 1 4 2 1 2 4 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 22SCHOOL: 047 TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 32 13 45 5 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BH SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 63 6 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL I BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT UM WF ' UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 3 3 48 6 54SCHOOL\n048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE\nUHT TOT BM SUSMRC PAGE (A DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE\n6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Theft Fighting CLASS K 2 2 2 010 030 040 1 2 1 2 1 2 SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 Theft Dis Cond 2 2 030 110 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Ref Ruis Theft Dis Cond 1 2 2 062 030 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 4 3 7 1 1 5 3 8 1 1 1 1 5 3 8 1 1 1 5 3 9 Ref Ruis Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 2 062 040 090 100 110 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 MinAlter FAILOBEY Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 060 030 040 105 110 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 4 5 1 3 1 3 5 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 8 FAILOBEY Assault Battery fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 060 010 020 040 090 105 110 150 1 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 5 1 3 9 1 21 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 3 9 1 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 3 9 1 23 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 4 9 1 24 FAILOBEY Theft PROSTAFF Dis Cond Paging D UEAPONSI 1 2 2 2 2 3 060 030 090 110 123 091 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1SCHOOL\n048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 2 2 4 4 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 40 11 51 10 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 65 5 11 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 4 5 9 51 11 62SCHOOL: 050 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT Of SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UH UF Ref Ruis 1 062 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 MinAlter 1 030 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 66 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 67 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SCHOOL: 051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL Mischief CLASS 01 2 080 SUBTOTAL 1 1 Paging D CLASS 05 2 123 SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Paging D Pos Weap CLASS 06 2 3 123 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 1 4 1 5SCHOOL: 052 WATSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BH SUSHRC 06/27/96 PAGE 68 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WH WF WHT TOT BH BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Harass FAILOBEY Fighting Dis Cond CLASS K 1 1 2 2 040 060 040 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 5 1 8 1 1 5 1 8 1 1 5 1 8 1 1 5 1 8 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Battery PROSTAFF Ind Exp Dis Cond Har Conn 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 060 062 110 010 020 090 100 110 120 CLASS 01 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 11 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond 1 1 2 2 2 060 062 040 100 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 2 4 1 1 9 1 2 4 1 1 9 1 2 4 1 1 9 1 2 4 1 1 9 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Conn 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 060 062 010 030 040 105 110 120 1 2 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL HinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Theft Fighting Dis Cond 1 1 1 2 2 2 030 060 062 030 040 110 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL HinAlter Ref Ruis Foul Lan 1 1 1 030 062 110 1 6 1 1 1 3 2 10 2 1 11 2 1 1 4 8 1 3 1 21 2 1 1 4 8 1 3 1 21 2 1 1 4 8 1 3 1 21 4 1 1 10 1 16 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 1 11 1 20 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 5 1 1 1 11 1 20 1 2 1 4 5 1 1 2 13 2 24 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1SCHOOL: 052 WATSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BH BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 06/27/96 PAGE 69 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/21/95 TO DATE: 6/03/96 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Fighting Mischief Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 2 1 2 . 2 010 040 080 110 3 7 SUBTOTAL ) 1 1 16 3 7 1 1 16 1 1 1 1 3 7 1 1 16 1 1 4 7 1 1 17 HinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 062 010 040 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 7 2 1 14 1 1 3 2 1 8 2 2 2 10 4 2 22 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 84 23 107 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 11 4 2 23 108 5 2 2 2 11 I, 23 113discipline manacement QbAltTEREV RETORT School. Franklin Incentive Beginning Period Q} Principa'.. Ending Period. \\\\ 1 PART 1. Please indicate number of suspensions by race and category. A. Out of School Suspensions - Category I Violations Black Total Black While Toial While Spanish Toial Span Asia/Pte Total Atta/ Pac Ind/r\u0026gt;k Tuul InJ' Esk Other Toul Other f  3Z 5 T.eiU coitintn Xttiee- si - 'rt 9 B9i wi/iagi, on 1 oniio incj 1 F I i M I F M I F M F M F M  I F TiHlIl I T i 1 4 I B. Long-Term Suspension - Category 11 Violations Cndei jSZ I 3: A 4 Black i.J. Toul Black While Toial While Spanish Total Span Aaia/Pac Total Alia/ Pac Ud/Fsk Total Ind/ Eak Other M I I Toial Other Toitit 3' 7 M ,5^ 1. F M F F M F M I F F 1_ 1 Tnuli P'f column I C. Expulsions - Category 111 Violations Gra Jet. Black Tvxal Black While Toul While Spaniah Toul Span Atit/I'ac Total Asia/ Pac Ind/Eik Total Ind/ Fbk Oiher K\u0026lt; Toul Other Tolala M F M F M F M F M F F  I 2. 3 3 l I I iL H I 1  Ttxali .olumn NOTE: Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Office one (1) week following the end of each Gradi Period, SEE REVERSE FOR PARTS II, III ANO IV.lARr II. Please complete. NOTH: These tipiires are to be included in Part I. 1996 01 Desei NOTE: Sindents on Sent Homes are not included in Part I. ni.,1 1 mIaI hlBil '\\bitc M iHtI ^itilc Jij'rtIMsh M i. Tiital Spnn Ajin'l'^ M I Total Asia/ I'.K-hbirsk M Total hili/ Ik Oih\u0026lt;r M F TeiU Otivr T.-i,.\n. I iTctiwivnb H-wn\u0026lt;hri If.'biKti Sr*c-t Id. bon .i___ t 1 --4/ I-I PART HI. Iwonal I.ata - . indicate race, sex and ecomnrcnd.ng the various suspensions. - Please indicate experience of staff memb.CIS  T^tachinj Fp\u0026lt; IK rue Blaat F Tidal BlaA F Total Willie SpnrtHh M I T\u0026gt;ia1 Span Asii/Iii, 0-3 -J. F Total Asia/ {ac InJ'H'k M I Ttnal IimM f sk Other I Tout Other TiMjI* 410 ll-iS 16-20 2I-2S 26-30 30 O\\cr Tout. I\nGfwks K PART IV, rr.ck TZ -iZHi 2 3 .5 6 Toialt r-r volwtTtn ?K P.nroll,ncnt Data - idease indicate and Race. Twal Black White Kt 2: J. 3 0 1- Total W hilc Spanish F Tual Span I a yi'iir scliools enrollment by Grade I.evel, .Sex' Aiifi/Pic M F Total Aiia/ l'ae iiij/rk M I-Total libl.' i:-.k Other M F 6 Total Othvr I o Total, ICr i 0 ('aiis. a rAyLa4rD(?M(., 15) 0 3S ii ils*- 1 ho i4 xit .331 \u0026amp; LA fc. D 313 W E D : 1 1 F'M R I G H T S F L I ? 41-3 55 p. e 3, SCHOOL rniigffw, LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Rsghtsell Elementary School 911 West 19 street Phone 324-2430 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 DATE: AprU 3^ TO: 2|Af^ie ^o\\we 11 FROM: oriifi FAX 5 3 -iOO \\ 'i2.y- -o 53 b^BJECl: ... D ispi pi ine.... Z^^uarl'erly RepcrTs CZfi'd N i*Ve c KiJ ( 3rc! SPECIAIz INSlRUOnONS: Number of pages {including cover page):___ 5 \"Carh AwAP^NFf^s/MAss MeoiA Awareness\" A P P * - 9 e Gi 5 : 1 2 MED PM F: I G H T  E L L . S C H O C L 3240535 'r,e- l^eshs DISCIPI.INE MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT RICHTSELjj ELEHE.'TAEY Beginning Period. 10-19-95 n'rincipal o.isQ xsf/ /i .PsuoKS Enejing Period PART 1. Plwse indicate number of snspensions by race and category. A. Out ot School .Su.s^X!nsioii.? - Category ( Violations b'l k THI c:iA SfOius  Tr'al SfOT A*i 'Fsv tiid-Uk + 1, t q. Asii/ Fa: TcUt IaJ/ F.V  I M I F T.xit oe.\u0026lt;r t i.i ri 4- p R fAtbuJin nOO v: .'I iJ B Long-Term Suspersion  category II Viob'.ions Crfd4 Rlick TniftI Fv.k T.-dsl WbiiB Spfifii.h Toiftl Spsr Asit'Pec Total Asia/ Pat- bdiLsk Teal IntJ/ EA O'/.sf Kt Tixil I- ii I-------------- .J. 5\nI1OC'I TflflJ r M F F F F K 1 2 3 5 i. H r F' . 0 2 T 1 i I 1 ) i M T r M f M F rf F F 1 I 1 I\nr i + i T  I 1 Ttrab per columr I C. Expulsions  Category HI Violations . FH-.M K\u0026lt; eOld.TlP Toal -4- I t 4 I HI J, Tnal Tc:! Spn Total *!/ Fa^ IrJ'Esk ToUl Ind/ fJlt Oth.ff Toj! 0-1 r' ozi:: Teau * li Ji ] F T SpAA\u0026lt;^ Asti.-'F*': M F M F N( P M F i !  I I + I } T X I I T i T I NOTE\nQuarterly kej.x'^ri.s are due in ilic Htanng Ufllcc one (1) week following the end or each Gr*:djn^ Period. srp JU-VLR5L J OR TARTS 11, IH AND IVap R 0 0 5:12 F' M R I G H T S E L L . S C H O O L 3240535 F' . 0 3 PART II. Piea$e compJeie. 2r,d \" NOTE\nThese figures Arc tc be jnclude^^ i. F^ri I. 'NOTE: Students on Sent Homes are no( included in Pan I. QSvk h.-lai w^:ic Sf anvil T.'lsl Wb-.'\u0026lt;  rpen AstiT*: OiHjr T?ijl d \"j M SJ F PS^ I M !  *. ,11 T X [ H-Tnrbf'jW IviW?\" I I I + 4 Spe, CdXb\u0026lt;4' I 1 T 1 5 T t i X PART III. Personal Data * Please indicate race, sex and experience of staff members tccon-imcndir.g ihc various suspensions. Ta\nhi\"j Cxp\u0026lt;ri*.n\u0026lt;4 eifk Toial BiaX Whi!\u0026lt; TyV\u0026gt;: V'Mie 5pani!iJl T0'} S,'in AUi'PftC Toial Asis' Psj h J Id: Tout Ind/ f,fc OMf 0.1 i-to 11-11 '.6 20 ----------P-4- !l-5, if isxi TcUii 2S-5O M P 2 4 M F M F M F F F 2 6 I I I T 1 I 4 I I I I ! ! T i ,iI I i I u 1 part IV. Enrollment Data - Please indicate your school's eorollmenc by Grade Level. Sex ano Race. I Cntc :\u0026lt;k .M F Twa! nti.k W\u0026lt; M Total V.iii1c Spen-ih M TolaJ Span AaiaPic Total Asti- ! 1-A 14 17 3) 0 Q 0 Hi. T- Teial Ind' Ek 0\u0026lt;r M 1 F 0 10 20 30 0 0 0 11 09 20 0 0 0 3 20 13 33 0 I 1 1 T.-. Oblvr 1 TcuilJ F\nf 32 20 12 15 25 0 0 0 5 6 snii.ru\" 21 10 98 le 39 1 40 09 19 0 0 0 0 1 I J 1 9S 19? 1 2 2 I 9 I V l'15'.-MCMt C*AF' P-\u0026amp;3  r' WEP 0 5:13 PM PIGHTSELL. C\nM O O L. 4 0 5 3 5 P . 0 4 Srdl /'Jine WeeE\u0026gt; DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT School Rlt^StLL ELEitENTARY Degirining i'eriod. 01~\u0026amp;3-6 pil -SkoKOf/ s^. _ Ending Pcrio\u0026lt;i__ \u0026gt;3-13-96 IAlVf I. Please indicate number of suspensions by race and calegoiy. A Out of Stlsotd Suspensions - Category ( Violations ]j GraJs.? L. I l il Tt*a. eU'.k Taiil bUcL U'hiU Kt Fine! White 5pa\u0026lt;b\u0026gt;Ik T.tfat Sjtnn AYitt/PaC k( T.-lflI A:iz' Pc h\u0026lt; IvUl InJ/ Elk ht TvAal enhk-* T. .i s I! 1 ''I M F P F R t [ K 1 2 3 5- A 1 1 T i 1 I 1 T 1 T I 1 1 ] I I 3 1i a. Long-Term Suspension  Categotv il Violations 3 t- n I GraJi Bla-k I__ rz IiIl i------- li. it P'-' Il cotutn.*) TolaJ biA^k Tclai Velkite ipaniih j A.A(t/pS Nt T.m*J A31|/ Pat Toul hJ/ (Aher ht zzi T.x*l 'i tl I! M r M F i M **1 Sp-tn F\nj I F T M F r I j i i r~r'~i I I I I C. Expulsions - CalCBory III Violations r Cr\u0026lt;Jci BiKk hi Tor** Sltk U^iis Tr.rl While Spaniisshn TC.'UmII f AAllllax'/PFttcc sr*fl r J F I M F Tl! A-\n\u0026lt;f Pbc Efk Oi\u0026gt;ef Tw-Ub I If ___ J. 2 ii MiluiAn .1. J. 1T + I Ini'P.tlt t f M F M F F CXhJf } I t 1 i I T I 1 T 7 t I 111 NOIL\nQuaritfly P.ctn^rls arc due in ir.c Ikarmg Ofllcc one (l) week following the end of each Grruimg rcru\u0026gt;J. Sfr. FOR PARTS H. IH AND IV. O's\nWED 05:14 PM E: I G H T 3 E L. L . S C H O O L P . GnS JrJ -0? P.ART l!. Please complex. 'R\nO|K43e ' I 'NOTE' These figures are Ic be included in Part I. NOTE: Sludcnu on Sent Homes are noi mciudcd in Part I T B'nel ___I TviM Whilu Ki nzi Ti'IkI Spar A\u0026gt;i'PsC i Cih.f **' rot kr\u0026lt;rK\u0026gt;'\u0026gt;b H'Wn^icx! l.Vj'y-'njn FdsKvij\u0026lt;.\u0026lt; .-i. PART HI Pck 04 4-10 I 21-2* 26-50 1 tvjij P/\\RT IV. r'j IJ Psf  cv'bflin Aiiii Pac 7171 T.'Ut iitf.f i..i J_____I \u0026gt;1 H !l T^'T Personal Data  Please indicate race, sex and expentnee cf staff members rccor.imqndir.g the \\anou5 suspensions. Te- at E'lek ------ Td*4l ^^iie u. SfBmsh I TuUt Srn Asii/Pis IpU* AV,k. P*.' TcUl Rd/ E\u0026gt;k OJicf TuXi Gb'icr 7 Uli j! 4- -.J C-XeS- 't 4- I Fnrollioent Dam - Please indicaie your school's cnrol'nsent by G.-ade Lcsel. Sc\\ and Paco. Uli.k I To* 1-----1 B!*A iz.]_____ U-hirc I T.a* ZI V.'hAtf Spieii-F. Srtr Tc**l Ps. Ir4 \u0026amp;ik Tp'ii T.'tM  OJ\u0026gt;eT P.r 14 1! 31 2! 12 21 10 10(1 Ii 31 20 31 10 13 34 15 18 19 102 202 32 31 37 27 \u0026lt;10 20 208 E^rtrii\n* I  1 I M , ? i ifij-eA M X I 1 1 F ! M F M . .\u0026lt;5 } 2 i T I I K 3 4 t 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 c 1 M 9 0 0 a ) 21 39 0 I 0 0 0 0 c I 0 2 T I i T T M F { F i I 1 ) i 1 I irtJi'f..-k I M I F 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 T r I 0 0 0 1 0 t 1 0 0 2 0 3 0- ) 1 M I 2 i A X i C.iTAVVOtd.'JCWGMfT ettR I G H T S E U L . S C H C O L APR THU PM Wiit  -1 .Z (K*. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL- \u0026gt;/** ..  DISTRICT I I TWWlllMl)|, P . 0 1 Rightsell Elementary School 911 West 19 Street Phone 324-2430 Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 DxMT:\n^pri I JUof q~ p TO\nFAX # 3'1! -OiOO FROM: -,_'\\pQrcf^ 3SrooB-\n\u0026gt; FAX# 32':^ t C d h I NS- SUBJECT: T}k\u0026lt;T.\nplme Charierty t^gpofb L yVeeks SPECLzUL INSTRUCTIONS: Number of pages (Including cover page): \"CARI^EH AVf^ARENESS/MASS MEDIA AWARENESS\" JP . O 2 THU PM 240535 DISCIPUNF, MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY REI-ORT School, lEMTARi Biginning Penod.. 10-19-95 Principai, Sho *QzJ \u0026gt;1). 'j54ooZ\u0026lt;S Ending Period. 12-19-95 PzLRT 1. Please indicaie number of suspensions by race and category. A. Ont of School Su.'ipen'.iioi'..s - Cnicgory t Violalions OrAduit Ola.k T.'tfli C\nj\nX V,'h\ne Tcial Spflnn.l T,.lil Span AsiI'Fic Teul Asi#' Fic InC. Lsk T i I i Tval hJ.' Fsk TxUl O-hcf l( .1 4 1 ii j\n,_L. L_.  ..'I 7tKd.\u0026lt; o ftdiiitin 11 Credo B, Long-Term Suspension - Categoiy 11 Violanon.s Fink t-r*l B^ack To..*t SVhiia T(.i.l S.an Aitl'PiiC Twul Pic tfld/Eik TcUZ {ziJ/ F.sk Olhtr Tnul CKftjr '1 Tnisb per column C. Expulsions - CiJiegory III Violations GrodiJi Blick T?til Slack V.'hlW Tniil ATitifl Aba-'Fi-: Xi 'rn Tctal Fa- Tuab p:r f X i .. -L ______ il I Toul ln\u0026lt;|/ Other Tout fh/icr 'I II i t T NOTE. Period. i 1 M R I G H T ELL . 5 C H i: L /V 'f'?- l^eeKs F F ri\u0026lt;\nhi'Sell el M F M F M P F 1 i I T i ! k I 1 1 i F F T X. I t i 1 M F I + I t F 1 M i Sr*niii F T i M F H + I i I 4 I I F F M I I F I T I I I M I F t 1 1 I I 1 I i 1 Te\ni.j Quaneriy Keporis aie due in liic Hearing Office one (1) week following the end of e.icli G.-adin,sTHU Q 3 PM R I G H T 3 E L L . C H Cl Q L 5 P . 0 3 J'c koo PART 11. Plea^iE complcic. r'lOTE: The.sc Ggures ate io be iiicludsd in Pan I. 'NOTE: Students on Sent Homes are not included in Part I. rr ei\u0026lt;k F I W.WU I TjhJ .Spnih I AV., Pa\u0026lt; *1 UL 3fi.. Xf Tki Ai'S' Fk Sn-J-eak O\nkc\u0026lt; f M T i K F I p Ls f M I TM4i t T..:-\n, I { fta(nvala rtomcbcAirJ + I I I t I I 1 I t I  I + ( :l J 11 !j PART m. Per.5onal Data - Please indicate race, sc.x and exfierience of staff members reconirtienditig the various suspensions. r T TdicP.inf Tta'.ii C-3 4.10 IM) iA-20 21-1^\n.so 3O.C\\ef TyuJi T .L  Slick To5*1 Sranish To'jI S,-n Ajii Pit\nI Tpul ASt4.' Pc\nind'Sik Tiu: Inez ClL O'Jtsr Tt.u: j O'?c\nI T I T T II ii Ji M F 2 4 4 M P M F F I P M F 1 I T 1 J I I I i + 1  T I 1 I PART IV. Enrollment Data - Please indicate your .school's enrollment by Grade Levei. Sex and Race, ! Cn4e T R!ai.k J Ki Tcnal Qlt'.k W-hi?. ''7 M F T?'l 5?ni*h M I ?rn A:atPi! M F K 1 U L? 31 0 0 0 tcUl Pac fnd.Esk 10 20 30 0 0 0  I II 3 4 5 i------ if' L Tj:aU ^lilurtd LI 20 12 2.1 10 93 05 20 0 0 T I + 1 T I X 13 33 0 1 1 13 25 0 0 0 I !6 39 1 0 I Os99 :. TAVLcunx-MCMT \u0026lt;i lo 0 0 197 1 I T F Toii Ind* Erk M I J_ ! 1 0 i 2 0. I T*t\nI ~ iXiwt I I 1 I \u0026gt; 30 3 .,_u_ 1 1 2 20 35 ij 25 40 i i 2 4 I 20 1THU PM R T GH T S E U U. SCHOOL P . 04 3rd a/ I ne V^ee Hs DISCIPLINE management QUARTERLY REPORT ScnriQi RIG'ilTESLL ELE.'X-'iTARY Beginning Penod,. 01-03^96 Prir.ci pai Sh Ending Penod______ \u0026lt;3 w PAMT 1. please indicate nu.Tber cf suspensions by race and caiegorv. .\\. Out ol Sdinol Su^pcns^cn? - Cafrgcry i Violations T ( Cradjj O!vk T.sl 'ATiijo M I F I Total SVhilB Spini\u0026gt;A -----1----- M I P T.-.ul S?nn Vsii.* Pic Tcul zUi*/ Fc Tc-.ii InJ'' ik CXhtr Tixal il A. i I + I 1 T (111 I T I I T 4- I J. '1 7\" I T'ljij F M F M I F T M F K 1 I 2 I t ? I i 9 I ---- ! I ! I -5 T i I I t T I T 1 I 1 I 1 3 1 I I i 1 I I T B. Long-Term SvspcnSion - Category II Violations J GraJei I Bla:k iLlHT eU:k Trial Uh:Jc Td.Yl V\"nil5 I Tc^al ).t Sr AO As'i'Psc Teui j bi Eik I !l r*'' ~l 4- Asiiz PC Tcu! hd/ Citi. T\u0026lt;MI Oihv I ll 4. 4- il ii II 1 IF Toiaii P\u0026lt;' I T 1 T 1 i I T I T ! L r I I I I 1 I L i  F i I 1 T Olhiif I F ! F M i F M r I I T I 1 T t I t T t I j  1 i I 1 I C- nxpulslons - Calegory FH Viokuien?- T ! t Toral Black\nTrftI SpaciUi I Td'mI t I Ajii-'Pe\nil ! ir il I! I! Tt'ih il 4----- f ! r-T 1 -i i Aiia/ Pec bd.'Eik i Tclil !:^1/ F-k Other Ta.a! Ojier Ts-Uii HJ ! in ei*'.k m e VF\u0026gt;i\n T I M I F: ' '.*\u0026gt;(16 i M F i T M M e F i I I 1 7 -  I T 1 4 ( 1 T I I i  1 1 i I ]___J I NO'I L\nPvf K'd. QiidflCfly Kcporis are due In the Hciiritig Ofhee one (1) week folJowing ihc end of fCeh Gf.iding 1 i'.SP rOR Pz^^\u0026lt;T.S n. iK Zm\\0 iVTHU PM 5 C H IJ O L PAriT il. Please coinpSfie. Ji rd 'R^k'Vsei! ^Q^oi R I G H T S E l_ L . *NC it: These figures are to be induced in Fart I NO 1 e\nStudents on Sent Homes are net indudeo in Part I. T T Mli.ic I T.'H n!iec \"] AWle LI___ T.hJ Pi\nitiann\u0026gt;s 1 I, inO'PA i ?.:! i hj- :hhjr  t w\u0026lt;l.\u0026gt;ni Ss.\n.! aM.yc Tauit PART in. Personal Dau - Please indicate lace, sex tnd experience of staff n^smbcrs rcccm.nier.ding the various snsj insions. S'lck* Ctrenenu eiKk Srjn 4 .Asi' Pj\n111. i i M ! .= i Tsui hi/ r EA o.J 4-10\nl.i5 1S-2C r X I t ift 30 Iti-Cher X I 4. I i I j Of\u0026gt;tt 1 TqlSI fj rli'aV+\u0026lt;rf P F ? P i M i F j eA i T.-.,.. i I i I I I J 1 T M I { I I t { I I I I I I ( I I i r I I I I I I I i I i i X 1 1 i I I i I J T\u0026lt;.a.' j F I \"1 Viliiie r I t i I T I T M 1 p i I\n! t\"! i  i i T t I 7 i T 4 I T i I I I 1 T i i I I T ! \u0026gt; I T I i 1 I 1 i I I Tvuu PART IV. Enrollment Data - Please indicate your schoor* enroilmcnt by Grade Level. Sex and Race. T,.., I T.,U.l \u0026lt;Wr P.f I Grade \u0026amp;b:k T\u0026lt;m*j Alack White T M ( r Tctil ^V'hila Sri !\u0026gt;3d.a M I F Td:ai i lAi/ f Other \u0026lt;W ! !4 1/! 31 11 3 i 21 21 10 culwp'.n 100 20 10 13 15 l 102 31 21. 39 L9 202 1. 3 0 .. h2d i 31 40 20 208 Aia,pi T-iiil ( I K 2 A 5 I P i  n 34 n r M f I E^k I F 'fij'.- 9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 !. 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 2 I 1 { I X I 1 0 c 0 1 0 I 1 T c 1 0 0 2 0 }. 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 I 37 i| tm.* I..' lAVi.:.* i\n.^MCWT Cl.9 I\" 11:16 AM Garland ,0 1 6T 1 6295  t  licmivE----------- Knou =!-Xi0Sffi.L8., A9,?5.... y oL wABji.____ _ iv M.ftEcwi\u0026lt; i9,,.i_2'\ns______ Please ind'caic nunibei of suspensions by rate anei category. I of Schooi Su5(X\nnsions  Caitgoty I Violaiions bl. i..., ...j ------- k----- Xu4 I --- I -r- TsMkl 30wih T.i'al 4in Y.oi ZslM' T.iUI hvJ' t 'Ihs-t Total Oih.f r: ....4- - 4... B r T Mi* .oJv-'-'' : *\u0026lt; I i\nXI t-t' --------- II 7 i --.k. Sus[\u0026gt;ension - Category 11 Violations (3-19 days) TacU tock X I. ! Tdi! Sf*** kJ (\u0026gt;k M' F.k T 4| f.ab JLLx-. j ...a i .1...i Expulsions Cawgory IJ! VioUlions n/A Ue) TM-t jp^ Tt\u0026gt;u\u0026lt;  Tout am/  DAL TsOi Kit iX\u0026gt;\u0026lt; T.oal t\u0026gt;\u0026gt;. f , T .Jl ________ UXs sL. L f 0 P . 04 I 1 a r : I I 'A^He M F M W F  m7 0 T 0 1 I t 5 6 I ) I 1 1 1 4 C *J.| I i w I ( t X1 I I I i I 0 0 M Tciil 7 r^ui F 0 0 0 r n Q M f ] M F 0 I n It - t I -.a ---^v F - i M f M i MTtk r M M F J r I i I NOI L Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Office one (II week follo'Aing the end of c.ivh \u0026lt;' PcnchL \nvt RP\\ liRSG FOR PAHl^ II. Ifl AND IV. A ii 1.1, .1. iM.Ai'iAGEMf.?,! 1 QlJARri.Kl.V RElXJUl .SftuK'l Garland Beginning Period Aiieiisr. 21.1995 1 rin\u0026lt;ipj| I Lionel Ward Ending Period October 17,1995 PART I. Please indicate number of suspensions by race and category. A. Out of .School .Suspensions - Category I Violations R:..i Total Black Wiiit Tmal White Spanish Total Span Aiia/Pac Total Asia/ Pac IndZEak Total Ind/ Esk Other Total Other Tol. 3. 1 J. 1 J. Mci ol 06, iS. P'f cliiKin 2 M F M F M F u M F M F M F z .UUli tiillfiij JMflilHWf B. Long-Term Suspension - Category II Violations Black Total Black While Total While Spanish Total Span AaiaZPac Total AaiaZ Pac (nd/Esk Total IndZ Esk Other Toial Other Tola\nF M F M F M F M F F Totals P'r column C. Expulsions - Category III Violations Co Jet Black h( Total Black While Total While Spanish Total Span Aaia/Pac Toul Atta/ Pac Ind/Etk Total IndZ Hak Oiher Total Other Toish F M F M F M F M F F I T I TidaSa P^ column NOPE: Period. Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Office one (1) week following the end of each (Ir.idir. SI E RIA'ERSF. FOR PARTS II, HI AND IV.PART II. Please complete. NOTE\nThese (igiircs are to be included in Part 1. NOTT. Students on Sent Homes are not included in Part I. 'I.inerfcMuy Remnvab 'xnrhoM^ islnunon AActiuna lui bun nuck M 1 1'otal Black 1 While M F Tsq.il While Spanish M F Total Span M F Total Asia/ Pac IntPEsk KI F Total InJ/ F-k (hher Kt F Total Oil'.cr 1 T.*t.' . 1 .i I ',1 II i( !| 'I PART III. Personal Data - Please indicate J- . . experience of staff members- recommending the various suspensions. .aching 0-3 . 4 10 11-15 16-20 2I-2S 26-30 JO-Over Tolali J* I Black M -X- 1 F X 2 PART IV. Black KI F  6 14 15 16 16 11.12. 15 lA 19 16 4 3 127 iRUHSCMCMr.ClB Tt.ial Black I M F Total White Spanish M r Toial Span AaiaZFu M F Total Asia/ Pac Ind/Rjk Kt F Total hid/ tsk , Other M F Total Other Totah 1 2 3 Enrollment Data - Please indicate and Race. your school's enrollment by Grade Level. Se ex 1. 3 11 1 T(Ma! Black 13 21 22 22 22 22 2^ 35 7 108 While KI F Tol.l While Spanish K1 4 0 A 1 1 2 F 1 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 13 6 Total Span i 0 6 1 3 3 2 Asia/Pac M F Total Asia/ Pae IiiJ/Eik M F Total Ind/ Fsk Other Kt F T..lai OUkt T.'Ul* Per C.rvle 18 29 38 30 35 29 32 38 1 _1_ 255Cradvi X. 1 2 3 4 5 6 S c h Ot, I _ Rockefeller Prineipa 1 Anne Mangan PART I. Please indicati Beginning Period 10/19/95 Ending Period 12/19/95 te number of suspensions by A. Out of School Suspensions - Category 1 Violations race and category. Biaclr M 2 1 1 F Total Black White M F Total While Spanish M F Tui.l Asia/Pac 2 Span I -ijil \"Tr y 1 1 1 1 Total Asia/ Pne ^,'h B J / U996 ^^iaiion !i,:f Id/E*k Total Other F ir.  niiori '3 Ind/  I----- 2 M I F Total Other Totals 2 2 T TihJ (Hf Ctdiinin 4 4 1 1 5 B. Long-Term'Suspension - Category II Violations = 1--------i Grade Blidk h1 Total Black White Total Spanish J\u0026lt; 1 2 3 While n----- . iJiLl Total Span Aaic/pac Total Asia/ Pac Ind/Esk Total Ind/ F.sk Other T..tal Other Toiait F M M F M F F 4 5 6 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 TrXatl ?! column 5 1 6 1 1 2 _4 d 7 C. Expulsions - Category III Violations Grades Black Total Black While Toul Whit. Spaniah Total Span Asia/Pac Total Asia/ Pac Ind/Esk Total Ind/ Fsk Other Total Other TiXalt M F M F F M F M F F Totali column NOTE: Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Offr Period. ice one (1) week follivt ing the end of each (Ir.iding SEE REXTRSE FOR PARTS 11, III AND IV.I'Aur 11. Ilc.isc toinplctc. NO] 12\nThese llgiircs are 10 be included in Part I. NO I P: Slndenus on Sent Homes arc not included in lart I, nu.i. M I 1 ilal Black 'Shile M r Total While S|n\u0026lt;)ixh M r ToIhI Span ** Vw HiHtK M F Tnl.l Asia/ Pne Ind/Esk X( F Total Ind/ Esk F Tot.U Other |jnir|rKy Henwsv bU Il'Knc K lufxi lnnuiin *-5*ACtlui  Srrtl IjIu. atiwn r\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ub part hi. Personal Data - Please indicate recommending the various race, suspensions. sex and experience of staff members- Teach in J rape nc nee 0 3 4-10 II 15 IA-20 21 25 26-30 30 Over Totals rdc t 1 2 r 1 i 5 Hata per uw Black M F PART IV. Black F Tula! Black M F Total White Spanish M I- Total Span Aiii/Poc M F Tul.l Asia/ Pac Ind/F.\u0026lt;k F Total Ind/ Esk Other M F Toul Other Toul\nI nnrollmcnt Data - Please indicate and Race. Total Black Vr'hite M r Total White Spanish M f: Total Span your school's enrollment by Grade Level, Sex Asia/Pac M F JJ. 22 14 15 12 11 106 Total Asia/ Pac Ind/Esk 22 li 18 11 ID. iZ. F -22 37 32 26 22 20. Ui 24 10^ 210 UMtDGCMGkir CM 6, 2 4 9 1 1 3 9 15 16 7 18 Total Ind/ Esk Other M F Total Other T.'tala Per Gr.sJe 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 T 5 8 2 16 9 7 i 1 1 1 _1 2 1 2 1 1 7 58 54 40 11 45 43 88 4 3 7 1 1 2 3 3 6 39 40 I 33 I 313 3FR I 11:17 AM Garland 50 1 .7 1 6295 P . 05 I'AlU U PU-.isv coiuplvtc. NOIL\nThese figures arc lobe irKludcd ni Part I. 'NOir.\nSiudciKs on SciU Homes arc oo\u0026lt; tnckidcd in P*vt t. .J --n--',-.-x- ,------- i',,i ISiO WmH White Spaoiak T.'I4 AKaPae TitUI rue T.xfH tnJ/ k\u0026gt;h (W? Al T\"'* n I XS, .' fZ7\" 7-' i------ L. T I t M f Sjifift \" A'U/ M F F F 5 1 X Pz\\kr HI Personal Oaia - Pieate iixlicaie race, sc* and uperience cf Haff memben IeeO'T.mending (he variou* MHptnsions H T T ng g\n\u0026lt; ti^.l C4a T(X( Whf\u0026lt; ht 0-5 J in n 15 11AA--2200 2 11 )() o\u0026gt; Tn.1. Twui $f\u0026gt;n ' TiA*! Nc Ind-F'k T(l M' t,k At TiMV (hher JI II ___ a. Aai*Pi.' n\u0026lt;t\u0026lt;tr T.Ul F M F F W F M F r .6-jn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 M -Ll^ 3 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PART IV. rntollincnl Oau - Please indicaie your schools enrollment by Grade l.evei. Sex and Race. HkI Trt*l 4l f\"' ' TocU WhiU irA 'riw ** rictMl TMl Am.^ Pk U4/Fitt TniI E^k l Tai Pc* GrJx XL ^Ji. 28 -a____28.. 16 12 28 18 [16 , 34 a. 15 12 27 32 56 C31 J7. 18 5 12 rn 3 3 -0____ total 125 110 235 12 5 1? _0 \"d 0 0, 0 .Ji- 38 8 253 T AatAdPwT M f M r u 1 1 3 4 ^2 T 8 1 1 F M F M F F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0T0 1 0 4 1 1 2T  0 0 0 0 0 2 17 4 1 3 0 Z 0 4.J-Z. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 AFR-26-96 FR I 11:14 AM GAPLAND S, hw.- Garland .Iccgntivs .. , nml ........ i Monel ____ I. '\u0026lt;1.... March.lB, IWj.. PART I Pleaig indicme number of suspcn.sions r- ,iKi cai^goty. 5Ktl671625 5 P . 02 A. Out cl Schon! Suspensions  Caiegoiy ! Viplitions A* I While \\A1U  *\"T ~ -Sl'in A*i4'P i LuI-fiK fsiT\" T.i*i Is Fkk T II. PiMkC T,,. A' I U------ I... .L. } .,1. r\" I t  i H J r T.-HtI I 1 I I - T I ! M f M M t I B/5^flX-Term Suspension - Category I! Violations (3-10 days,) C '4i B4*k Ki Whiw Tc\u0026lt; Aw.'Pte T\u0026lt;M1 Aait' Ftu lf*d' F.K Ki F M F M M F F F 3 4 . 1 0 ..L._- - It 0 _______a,.-_ 0 0 T uU 14 J. 15 e*MM 21 XL 0 0____ .Q,. .=-Q 6 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0  1 C. iiXpuhions - Category HI Violations M Tutel wbM T.a*I Spi Ttui AM.' Fk TjwI F\\*i Kf \u0026lt;Hh.f i 1 ol M P f bAi'Ftk M F M F F I ... E I NOTE: Quarterly Reports are due in the Heafiiig Office one (I) week lollo'Aing iho end of e.uii GruJuip PfoO** SKE REVliRSE FOR PARTS H. IH AND |V.APR-26-96 PR I AM 5016716295 P . 03 IAKF II. PIC.I'^C COfllpklC. NOU:' These hgufcs are to be irKludcd in Part J **NO7r.- SiudcfUs on Sent Homei are not included in Part I.  T SS^kitt! T.Mll T T- M *h.*\u0026lt;  M rz r T\u0026gt;.ia S|iA() At.* P\u0026lt;V M. He M F [ Pa. Kt T.MH trU oih*f C*k Kt F I 7..,u iKh.-r Tm,. ii I) 5- H V- h Free I I ( ..L u. PART lU. Personal Oata - Plrair indicate race, sex and experience of Half menstsers leeon,mending (he varioxi* suspensiooi. I I I T 'T'- { Btiik ra:\nBilik Tutil \u0026amp;)sK TyUl Ab4'Pu TtMl AlUZ irtd'F'k 4-1. ,.l .1 Ji 0 .a 0 II IS i#-)o 1_.A, At TtHal (wv 14 Ji 0 Other KI (hh T.-uh ij-------L 311' IS 3'1 3U O-cf Tioli Cl '\",*4. n\u0026lt; V ) n 6 T M F -..1.... ii. X 0 0 Sr*ni4i M F M F 0 1 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 9 PART IV. Lnrollincni Dati - Please indicale your schools enrollment by Grade I.evei, Se\\ and Race. Pre-K K Cr4\u0026lt; I T Tm*! T WM* r TntW w.w H F Ttfal M F TMl hK U^Etk M F lol/ e-k OiHf h1 12 17 29 0 3 2 5 0 .0 0 0 7 F ' i td J OriJc I ._0_____15_. 0 29 Vst__ 2nd 3.3 0 . 4 0 4  0 0 0 .7 3rd Sth 6 th CBI TOIAL 16 li 21 i9qn4_j6____ 1 20 5 'UX^^ 16 3 36 8 1 0 Ci Q 0 A 1 G 1 1 i 1 0 1 1 1 3 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \"o 0 128 111 239 1 0 1 11 6 11 (} 0 ..-0-.-.. 28 0 0 0 o' 0 0 39 27 t... 39 8 2'jl rAn\u0026lt;MrA.X-^\u0026lt;iif da**\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"abj_bplsb02_7701","title":"Discover greatness: Birmingham's Black baseball heritage","collection_id":"abj_bplsb02","collection_title":"The Scrapbooks","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Southern States, 33.346678, -84.119434"],"dcterms_creator":["Birmingham Public Library (Ala.)"],"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["ill."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Birmingham, Ala. : Birmingham Public Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Birmingham Black Barons (Baseball team)","Baseball--Alabama--Birmingham","African American baseball players","Minor league baseball","Negro leagues","African American baseball players--Alabama--Birmingham","John Cotton Dana Library Public Relations Award"],"dcterms_title":["Discover greatness: Birmingham's Black baseball heritage"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Birmingham Public Library (Ala.)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm16044.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/BPLSB02/id/7701"],"dcterms_temporal":["1991-2000"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This material may be protected under Title 17 of the U. S. Copyright Law which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research."],"dcterms_medium":["scrapbooks"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_392","title":"Dismissal for settlement plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1997"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","School management and organization","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Dismissal for settlement plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/392"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)","newspaper clippings"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nA'/e. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FILED district COURT eastern district ARKANSAS DEC 1 2 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES W. McMRMACK. CLERK ' OEP CLERK :S,McMRMA ' t PLAINTIFF vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL RECEIVED DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DEC I 4 1995 INTERVENORS SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Office of Deseflregatiofi INTERVENOR Montofiiiy ORDER Upon motion of the Joshua Intervenors, and without objection. the time for filing a response to the Little Rock School District's motion for an order of dismissal is hereby extended to and including January 5, 1996. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of December 1995. JUDGE WfS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET RWppt i COMPLIANCE WITH RUL IN 2 S 8 8 1 I RECEfVED 1 5 1995 Office of Desegregation ^ASTefOo oisVfICT g'^y^r, '^^kansas Moiuiuimy CH ---------  - _ JAMES W. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT (^URT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 2 I99S '^COKMACK. CIERK 'EP CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Come now the Joshua Intervenors, by and through undersigned counsel, and move the Court for an extension of time within which to file their response to the Little Rock School District's motion for an order of dismissal state: 1. Additional time is needed in which to respond to the motion recently filed by the LRSD. Said motion is not being made for purposes of delay. Counsel for the Little Rock School District does not oppose said extension. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Joshua Interevenors respectfully pray the Court for an order extending the time in which they may respond to the LRSD motion to and including January 5, 1996. 2. 3.Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Br Little/ tway (501) :ohk, AR 72206 By: CBRTIF .TE OF SERVICE 8 I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing was forwarded to all counsel of record via U.S. mail on December, 1995. ,his day of Jo: Walker IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT RZCEIVED PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 DEC 1 1995 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL Office Of Desegregation Woiinonnfl UI ucQ a J DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL Introduction The settlement agreement in this case requires that the case be dismissed with prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD. The settlement agreement was approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and by this court, but the required order of dismissal was overlooked and has not been entered. In accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement. LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD are entitled to an order of dismissal. Statement of the Case The \"RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE LRSD, I* which was approved by this court and the court of appeals as Attachment B to the settlement agreement, contains the following requirement: \"It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (including, but not limited to. Cooper v. Aaron. Norwood v. Tucker and Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District) (the II Litigation\") is to be dismissed withprejudice as to the LRSD and the former and current members of its board of education named in the Litigation. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans.\" Pulaski County Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2. The settlement agreement also requires that this case be dismissed with respect to PCSSD and NLRSD. Settlement Agreement, Attachment C, p. 2 and Attachment D, p. 2. The settlement agreement contains the following \"Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua And The Districts\": \"Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans.\" Settlement Agreement, p. 19. This litigation ended with the approval of the settlement agreement except that this court has retained jurisdiction. in accordance with the agreement. to resolve issues related to implementation of the desegregation plans and enforcement of the settlement agreement. An order of dismissal, however, has not yet been entered. Argument The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved the parties' settlement agreement on December 12, 1990. LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371 (Sth Cir. 1990) . The court of appeals directed the district court, on remand. \"to approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them.\" Id. at 1394. On January 18, 1991, this court 2ordered that II [t]he parties' settlement agreement is hereby approved as written by them.\" According to the terms of the settlement agreement set forth above, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD were entitled to an order of dismissal with prejudice upon this court's approval of the settlement agreement. The order required by the settlement agreement will not affect this court's authority, as described in the settlement agreement, to retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the desegregation plans and to conduct proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement or the desegregation plans. The question of whether a certain component of the settlement agreement should be implemented has arisen once before. In LRSD V. PCSSD. 971 F.2d 160 (Sth Cir. 1992) , the court of appeals confronted the issue of whether the district court was required to extend certain millages in accordance with Item M of the settlement agreement. The district court had \"thought it 'unwise to infer from the court of appeals' approval of the settlement agreement that [the district court was] required to extend the omitted millages. II Id. at 164. The Eighth Circuit said: \"What the district court failed to recognize is that we directed it to 'approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them.\" \"[A]s written by them,\" the settlement agreement included Item M, which corrected the problem of the omitted millages. The extension of the omitted millages is therefore settled as the law of the case.\" Id. at 165 (citations omitted, emphasis in original). 3One of the reasons the district court had given for declining to implement Item M was that even though the court of appeals had approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, it had not specifically mentioned Item M in its opinion. Id. at 164. The court of appeals made it clear that the parties were entitled to implementation of all of the terms of the settlement agreement: \"The Special Master approved the agreement, including Item M, as did the district court. Most importantly. when the matter came before this court on appeal from the district court, we held that the settlement agreement as drafted by the parties met constitutional standards and directed the district court to approve the settlement agreement as submitted by the parties. therefore. We do not. agree with the district court that it is necessary to infer approval of Item M from our earlier opinion. Our language was clear in its approval of the entire agreement, including Item M.\" Id. at 165. The releases of liability for each of the districts and the dismissal with prejudice of this litigation are important components of the settlement agreement and are at least as significant as the extended millages. The approval by the court of appeals and this court of the entire settlement agreement entitles the three school districts to an order dismissing this case with prejudice. Conclusion This court should enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice effective January 18, 1991. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 4FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Christopher Heller Robert Shafer John C. Fendley By* Christopher Hell Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Brief In Support of Motion for Order of Dismissal has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 30th day of November, 1995. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roache11 and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 5Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 6 a/'rLuMe-\u0026lt;i- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-8\u0026amp;6 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL RECE!^ DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL DEC I 1995 INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Office Of Desearegaiiofi INTERVENORS MOTION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL' ' For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This court approved the parties' settlement agreement in an order filed on January 18, 1991. The January 18, 1991 order dismissed the State of Arkansas as a party to this case pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement. 2. The settlement agreement also requires that this case be dismissed with prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD. The \"RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE LRSD,\" which was approved by this court and the court of appeals as Attachment B to the settlement agreement, contains the following requirement: \"It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al, No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (including, but not limited to. Cooper v. Aaron. Norwood v. Tucker and Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District) (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed with prejudice as to the LRSD and the former and current members of its board Litigation. of education named in the This dismissal is final for all purposesexcept that the court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans. II Pulaski County Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2. The settlement agreement also requires that this case be dismissed with respect to PCSSD and NLRSD. Settlement Agreement, Attachment C, p. 2 and Attachment D, p. 2. The settlement agreement contains the following 3 . \"Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua And The Districts\"\n\"Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans.\" Settlement Agreement, p. 19. 4. LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD were entitled to an order of dismissal upon this court's approval of the settlement agreement on January 18, 1991. A review of the docket shows that the required order has not been entered. According to the terms of the settlement agreement, the district court should enter an order of dismissal with respect to LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD effective January 18, 1991. 5. The requested order of dismissal would not affect this court's jurisdiction \"to address issues regarding the implementation of the plans\" or to conduct \"proceedings to enforce the terms of [the] settlement or the terms of the Plans.\" WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the accompanying brief. the Little Rock School District moves in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement for an order 2dismissing this case with prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD as of January 18, 1991, except to the extent the court retains jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the plans and to conduct proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement or the desegregation plans. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Christopher Heller Robert Shafer John C. Fendley By: Christopher Helle, Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Order of Dismissal has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 30th day of November, 1995. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 3Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 .ristopher Heller 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS APR - 9 1996 JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK By. PLAINTIFOEH. CLERK (f PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL APR 1 2 1996 DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL ^Office of Desegregation dsori.'! INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF APPEAL Plaintiff Little Rock School District hereby gives notice of its appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the March 11, 1996 Order which denies the Little Rock School District's Motion to Dismiss this case with prejudice and refuses to reconsider its previous order concerning a contract between the Little Rock School District and ServiceMaster Management Services. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By(' Christopher Heller Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 9th day of April, 1996\nMr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 John C. Everett 3822 N. Parkview Drive P.O. Box 1646 Fayetteville, AR 72702 Joseph S. Mowery 111 Center Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher 2 Filed U 3, OlSTtsiCT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAR 1 I 1996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES By\n3 W McCjORMACK, C U-xJAWa OEP CCLLIERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES A Limited Partnership INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court are a number of motions (listed in the order filed) which the Court now addresses: (1) motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan [doc.#2481]\n(2) motion of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for partial unitary status [doc.#2483 ]\n(3) motion of the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for infoirmation and without prior involvement of Joshua [doc.#2506]\n(4) motion of PCSSD to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520]\n(5) motion of Joshua for the Court to set forth in detail the continuing vs. Ctev I 3 obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544]\n(6) motion of PCSSD for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#2546]\n(7) motion of LRSD for an Order dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD, and the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\") [doc.#2573]\n(8) motion of Joshua for reconsideration of 2 6 4 the Court's Order of December 11, 1995, and for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594]\nand (9) motion of PCSSD regarding the replacement of portable buildings with permanent construction. dated October 25, 1995 [doc.#2612]. I. The Court first addresses PCSSD's motion to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan [doc.#2481] and LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483]. The PCSSD states that it has substantially complied with plan provisions regarding library media services, staff development and counseling services, while the LRSD states that it has substantially complied with LRSD plan provisions regarding Home Instructional Program for Preschool Youngsters (\"HIPPY\"), Rockefeller Early Childhood Program, Parkview Science Magnet Program, and Job Training Partnership Act/Summer Learning Program (\"JTPA\"). Both the PCSSD and the LRSD argue that the Court should withdraw supervision from these areas of the respective plans. The PCSSD's and LRSD's motions were both filed on August 23, 1995. On February 9, 1996, the parties entered into a Stipulation whereby it was agreed that the PCSSD, LRSD, and NLRSD should be released from court supervision and monitoring in certain discrete areas of the desegregation plans. The parties further stated that they are in the process of assessing what additional areas of the desegregation plans are ripe for release from Court supervision and monitoring and to identify what areas of the desegregation plans -2-remain deficient in terms of compliance. The additional hearings that were scheduled to address the motions to withdraw were cancelled at the parties' request as a result of the Stipulation. In light of the Stipulation and subsequent cancellation of the hearings, the Court finds that both the PCSSD's motion to withdraw [doc.#2481] and the LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483] have both been superseded by the Stipulation. Accordingly, these motions are denied as moot. II. On August 31, 1995, Joshua filed a motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506]. In its motion Joshua argues that (1) the LRSD had not discussed the proposed management services contract with the Joshua Intervenors, (2) the proposed management contract has potential adverse racial effect and impact, (3) the proposed management contract has not been let for bids and is not a part of the program. research and evaluation instrument for the next five years, (4) the proposed management contract has potential adverse monetary effects upon financial resources of the district and has the potential for adversely affecting the ability of the school district to meet its a desegregation obligations, and (5) the proposed management contract was not negotiated at arms' length and was designed to provide special favor to some unknown person in the school district. -3-The Court held a hearing on Joshua's motion on Saturday, October 28, 1995, and again on Friday, December 8, 1995. At the hearing on December 8th, counsel for Joshua tendered into evidence a document entitled \"Settlement,\" which Joshua maintains constitutes a settlement offer by LRSD that was accepted by Joshua with respect to the ServiceMaster contract. Joshua claims that this constitutes an offer by LRSD to settle the matter with Joshua by having the Court enter an Order enjoining the LRSD from entering into the ServiceMaster agreement and terminating the district's liability pursuant to Paragraph 14.12 of the contract. The LRSD, however, contends that this document was not intended as an offer to settle, in that it is stamped \"Draft\" and is not signed by any party or the attorney for any party. On December 11, 1995, this Court issued an Order in which it ruled as follows: This Court declines to rule on whether this 'settlement' constitutes a binding agreement on the district or on whether the board of directors delegated Mr. Malone the authority to enter into it with Joshua. The Court finds that even if Mr. Malone had the authority and even if it was an offer to settle which Joshua accepted, settlement. public This policy 'settlement' prohibits this type of purports to create a situation in which this Court, by agreement of Joshua and LRSD, would by court order declare the agreement to be non-binding on the part of LRSD and would relieve LRSD of any liability. Indeed, Paragraph 14.12 of the ServiceMaster contract provides an \"escape clause\" for LRSD should this Court terminate or ServiceMaster agreement. modify the It provides that LRSD shall have no obligation to appeal decisions affecting the contract. Therefore, it implies that LRSD will in good faith abide by the terms of the contract and will not contract with Joshua or anyone else to procure a court order allowing it to escape liability. It would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a -4-contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party. This Court finds that ServiceMaster and LRSD did not intend that this clause would permit Little Rock to escape liability without a ruling on the merits. Therefore, the Court holds that this purported settlement cannot be enforced against ServiceMaster. Order, at 5-6 [doc.#2586]. On December 22, 1995, Joshua filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order of December 11, 1995, and for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594]. Joshua states they have not completed their presentation in support of their initial motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract, and they argue the Court has not ruled on the substantive grounds which it has set forth in its motion. The Court has considered the matter and remains convinced that its interpretation of the contract was correct and that it would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party. See Order, at 6. Joshua cites Union Nat. Bank v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n, 860 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1988), in support of its motion. The Court finds Joshua's reliance on Union Nat. Bank to be misplaced, however. as that case involved a termination clause between the parties to the contract, see id. 860 F.2d at 849, while the case at Bar involves a purported settlement between a contracting party and a third party allowing the contracting party to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the non-settling -5-party. Union Nat. Bank is thus distinguishable and provides no support for Joshua's motion for reconsideration. In any case, even if Joshua is correct that such a unilateral escape from contractual obligations would be permissible under Arkansas law, the parties in this case intended that the contract would be performed in good faith unless this Court issued an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability pursuant to 5 14,12 of the contract. The Court has not and will not at this time issue such an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability under the contract. Accordingly, the Court denies that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for reconsideration of the Court's December 11, 1995, Order. With respect to that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for completion of the hearing, the Court finds that this aspect of the motion should be and hereby is denied as moot. The Court notes that the December Sth hearing was not completed because Joshua specifically requested that the matter be continued so that it could file an interlocutory appeal of the Court's Order. Tr. at 92, 97. Indeed, Joshua stated that such an appeal would \"resolve a lot of matters. II Tr. at 90. It was only after Joshua concluded that the Order was not appealable that Joshua now asks that the hearing be completed. However, because the Court's docket is full. the Court is unable to schedule the matter for a hearing in the immediate future. Accordingly, for administrative purposes. and because the Court in any case denies Joshua's motion for reconsideration, the Court concludes that Joshua's motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following -6-bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506] should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. Joshua may refile the motion to the extent they wish to pursue the matter after reviewing today's order. Should Joshua refile the motion, the Court will schedule the matter for a hearing. III. On September 14, 1995, the PCSSD filed a motion to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520]. PCSSD seeks to clarify those parts of the plan and programs that are or were calculated to further desegregate the southeast sector schools within the PCSSD, i.e., the Talented and Gifted Program within the southeast sector. the Fine Arts Program at Landmark, the Specialty Program at Bates Elementary, and Harris Elementary. The Court has considered the motion and finds that it should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. Joshua has not filed a response to the motion even though they would appear to be significantly affected by the matters contained therein. In any case, the status of this motion is questionable given the subsequent motions of PCSSD regarding potential school closings and new construction that would affect the schools in the southeast sector and elsewhere. Should PCSSD refile this motion, Joshua is expected to file a timely response stating their position on the matter. -7-IV. The LRSD moves for an Order dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to the LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD as of January 18, 1991, except to the extent the Court retains jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the plans and to conduct proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement or the terms of the plans [doc.#2573]. The Court finds that the motion for an order of dismissal should be and hereby is denied. Let there be no mistake that, with the entry of the settlement agreement, the claims involved in this ongoing litigation were dismissed. at least as a technical matter. The Court finds. however, that no useful purpose would be served by entering an order of dismissal at this time. The Court of Appeals has instructed this Court \"to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement. and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require.\" Little Rock School List. V. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (Sth Cir. 1990) . The LRSD has frequently exhibited indifference or outright recalcitrance towards its commitments and has been slow to implement many aspects of its agreements (although some improvements have been made) . Therefore, the Court finds that an order of dismissal should be deferred in order to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement. Even had the LRSD acted in good faith throughout the years. the logistics and -8-complexity of this case are such that this Court's monitoring function would be impaired by entering this time. an order of dismissal at V. On October 25, 1995, Joshua filed a motion asking the Court to set forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544]. Joshua objects to certain staff and faculty assignment practices of the LRSD and contends that the parties have a material disagreement. Joshua seeks an Order which either defines or interprets the obligations of the LRSD with respect to faculty and staff. The Court has considered Joshua's motion and finds that it should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. The obligations of the LRSD regarding faculty and staff are clearly set forth in both the LRSD Plan and the Interdistrict Plan and need not be repeated here. Moreover, the parties have agreed in their Stipulation that they are in the process of assessing what additional areas of the desegregation plans are ripe for release from Court supervision and monitoring and to identify what areas of the desegregation plans remain deficient in terms of compliance. Should the parties be unable to reach agreement regarding faculty and staff desegregation, Joshua may refile its motion. -9-VI. On October 26, 1995, PCSSD filed a motion for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#2546]. In its motion, PCSSD asks for permission to begin construction on one permanent classroom at Jacksonville Elementary, four permanent classrooms at Bayou Meto, seven permanent classrooms at Landmark Elementary, and three permanent classrooms at Pine Forest Elementary. On January 29, 1996, PCSSD filed a subsequent motion regarding the replacement of portable buildings with permanent construction dated October 25, 1995 [doc.#2612]. This latter motion supplements and essentially supersedes the previous motion filed on October 26, 1995. In its supplemental motion, PCSSD seeks permission to begin construction on two permanent classrooms at Cato Elementary, two classrooms at Arnold Drive Elementary, four permanent classrooms at Bayou Meto, seven permanent classrooms at Landmark Elementary, and three permanent classrooms at Pine Forest Elementary. The Court has carefully considered the matter and concludes that PCSSD's request is consistent with the district's long-range plans for replacement of portable buildings. The construction will not increase the capacity of the aforementioned schools, with the exception of Pine Forest Elementary.' Accordingly, the motions for an Order regarding portable buildings are hereby granted. 1 On Sqjtembcr 15, 1995, the Court approved a motion granting the PCSSD permission to add a kindergarten class to improve racial balance at Pine Forest Elementary. The district has represented to the Court that one of the permanent classrooms would reflect the additional capacity resulting from the new kindergarten class. -10-VII. In sum, the Court denies as moot PCSSD's motion to withdraw [doc.#2481], denies as moot LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483], denies that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for reconsideration of the Court's December 11, 1995 Order [doc.#2594], denies as moot that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594], denies without prejudice Joshua's motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506], denies without prejudice PCSSD's motion to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520], denies LRSD's motion for an Order of dismissal [doc.#2573], denies without prejudice Joshua's motion for an Order setting forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544], and grants PCSSD's motions for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#'s 2546 \u0026amp; 2612]. IT IS SO ORDERED this // ^^day of March 1996. 'A DGE PHIS DOCUMt.NT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON BY -11- 1 J IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT. ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. ET AL. DEFENDANTS J ! i LORENE JOSHUA ET AL. INTERVENORS THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' OPPOSITION TO THE LRSD'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 The Joshua intervenors oppose the LRSD's motion for an order of dismissal and i i i urge that it be denied. The Little Rock defendants ignore, among other things: the details of the treatment of the issues of continuing jurisdiction and monitoring by the Court of Appeals, when that Court addressed the proposed settlements in 1990\nthe overall legal context in which the Court of Appeals considered the settlements\nthe differing terms of the \"Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement\" (September 28.1989) with regard to the State and the local districts\nand the history of this case since the Court of Appeals decision. I. A. The Legal Context: The Doctrine of Continuing Jurisdiction and the Violations To Be Remedied The legal context relevant in considering the LRSD motion begins with the decision in Brown v. Board of Education. 349 U.S. 294 (1955) (Brown II). The Court there began 1by reiterating the holding of Brown. However, the focus of Brown II was \"the manner in which relief [should]... be accorded\" in segregated systems, jd., at 298. The Court recognized that \"the transition to a system of public education freed of racial i discrimination\" might \"require solution of varied local school problems\" (id., at 299) arising in many areas of school administration, id., at 300. The Court held that local district 1 courts could best oversee the required remedial efforts (id., at 299), and directed that those courts retain jurisdiction of cases during the transition period. I The Supreme Court returned to the proper role of a district court in the remedial I 1 phase of a school desegregation case in Raney v. Board of Education of the Gould Sch. I i Dist., 391 U.S. 443 (1968), there confronting a case which had been dismissed. The Court I rejected this approach, identifying the need for a Court to focus in the remedial period on whether \"a constitutionally permissible plan\" \"is operated in a constitutionally permissible fashion....\" ii, at 449. A district court should retain jurisdiction \"until it is clear that disestablishment has been achieved....\" The next relevant part of the legal context is the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case in 1985, addressing, in part, this court's order (then Judge Henry Woods) requiring consolidation of the three local districts. See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 778 F. 2d 404 (8th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert, denied. 476 U.S. 1186 (1986). The Court of Appeals \"[held] that the district court's findings on liability [were] not clearly erroneous and that intra- and interdistrict relief [were] appropriate. [The court found], however that the violations [could] be remedied by less intrusive measures than consolidation.\" See 778 F.2d at 408. The Court then set forth in detail \"principles\" to 2govern the required intra- and interdistrict remedies (at 434-36), and \"remanded [the case] to the district court for further action consistent with [its] opinion\" (at 436). B. The Court of Appeals Decision of 1990 Concerning the Settlement On remand, the parties ultimately developed five agreements in an effort to repond to the Court of Appeals' 1985 decision. In its opinion of December 1990, the Court of Appeals described Judge Woods' treatment of these agreements as follows: 'The District Court rejected both the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, as submitted. It purported to modify them and to order the unwilling parties to put them into effect as modified.\" Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 921 F.2d 1371, 1376 (Sth Cir. 1990). The Court of Appeals rejected this general approach (ii)\nhowever, it is vital, with regard to the current motion, to focus with care on the Court's treatment of the question of continuing jurisdiction and monitoring. The Court of Appeals first discussed the standards governing its review of the parties' settlement. See, for example, id., at 1383-85, 1388-89. On the one hand, it emphasized the importance of the parties' agreement and the public policy in favor of settlements. Id, at 1383,1388. The Court also recognized, however, its responsibility to insure that the agreements were not \"unfair to class members...\", or ones inconsistent with the \"[court's] strong interest in not involving itself, along with the prestige of the law, in an ongoing equitable decree vzhich is either manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face.\" Id, at 1383. The context for the Court's 1990 decision, then, had multiple facets. It included legal principles regarding the fundamental importance of continuing jurisdiction until violations 3are cured\nthe need to provide, in this case, remedies for intra- and interdistrict violations of the constitution\nthe parties' agreements\nand the principles regarding review of settlements in class actions, striking a balance between the fact of agreement and important legal standards. The Court's application of these principles produced, we submit, the following holding relevant to the matters raised by the current LRSD motion. The district court must retain jurisdiction of the case with regard to the three local school districts for a considerable time to monitor compliance with the settlement agreements (see, for example. ii, at 1383, 1388)\nand the parties have agreed to this continuing jurisdiction and monitoring, if necessary to secure approval of the agreements. I^, at 1386,1390. The following excerpts from the Court of Appeals decision demonstrate that this interpretation is a valid one. 921 F.2dat1376 We now reverse the judgment of the District Court. In general, we direct that Court, on remand, to approve the settlement plans and settlement agreement as submitted by the parties. We also make certain other directions for the future of the case. 921 F. 2d at 1383 This does not mean that a court must automatically approve anything the parties set before it. In the present case, for example, any remedy will necessarily reguire some judicial supervision -monitoring, at least - for a long time. A court has a strong interest in not involving itself, along with the prestige of the law, in an ongoing equitable decree which is either manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face. In addition, this is a class action, and courts are not obliged (indeed they are not permitted) to approve settlements that are unfair to class members, or negotiated by inadequate class representatives. 921 F.2d at 1386 4The district Court was concerned about the lack of sufficient detail in the plans to guarantee successful implementation. The answer to this concern lies, we think, in the fact, upon which we place a great deal of weight, that the parties have all agreed to continued monitoring. Indeed, such monitoring by the District Court and its agents is essential. It is important for the settlement plans to be scrupulously adhered to - and here we have in mind especially the kind of programs that the plan contemplates for the incentive schools - and it will be the job of the district Court to see that this monitoring is done effectively, and that appropriate action is taken if the parties do not live up to their commitments. 921 F.2d at 1388 As indicated above, this does not mean that the parties will be free of supervision or monitoring. Quite the contrary: a necessary condition of our holding that the plans are not facially unconstitutional is that the parties'compliance with them will be carefully monitored. As we shall make clear at the conclusion of the opinion, when we set out the directions to be followed by the District Court on remand, the office previously known as the Office of the Metropolitan Supervisor will be reconstituted as the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, to be headed by a Monitor appointed by the District Court, with such additional personnel as the District Court shall deem appropriate. 921 F.2d at1390 ....We accept these undertakings [of the districts], again with the reminder that that compliance with them will be closely monitored. If the District Court becomes convinced in the future that money is being wasted, and that desegregation obligations contained in the settlement plans are being flouted, it will be fully authorized to take appropriate remedial action. As the parties agree, the settlement agreement implicitly authorizes the District Court to retain jurisdiction to oversee its implementation. See 14 App. 3466. The approach which we urge is also consistent with the Court of Appeals' summary of its rulings appearing at 921 F.2d 1394. The Court wrote in paragraph (8.): The District Court is instructed to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement, and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require. The Court added, in addressing the issue of a transition to the standards of the 5settlements, that if the parties could not resolve the matter by agreement, \"the district Court [was] authorized to take such action as may be just\" (at 1394, para, 9). To be sure, the Court also wrote: \"On remand, the District Court is directed to approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them.\" li, at para. 6. However, as the excerpts of the opinion quoted above demonstrate, the Court of Appeals interpreted the \"settlement agreement\" to reflect the parties' agreement to continuing jurisdiction over the local districts and monitoring of the agreements. After all, each release relating to the three districts contained this sentence: 'This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the Court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the plans.\" E.g., \"Settlement Agreement,\" Attachment B., at 2. The quoted language from the release also puts to rest the LRSD's reliance on the dismissal of the State in this court's order of January 18,1991. See Motion, at para. 1. The quoted sentence is absent from the release regarding the State. See \"Settlement Agreement\", at Attachment A, p. 2. C. The Court of Appeals Decision Regarding the Modification of the Settlement The opinion of the Court of Appeals in 1991 addressing the standards to be employed by this court in considering proposed modifications to the settlements also warrants brief reference. In describing the manner in which this court should proceed on remand, the Court plainly paraphrased the standard set forth in Brown II, to which we have alluded above. See Appeal of Little Rock School District, 949 F.2d 253, 257 (Sth Cir. 1991). The Court added: \"We ask the District Court, to the extent practicable, to give this 6matter priority on its docket.\" at 258/ D. The History of the Case Since the 1990 Decision The Court of Appeals' reference to this court's docket provides an apt starting point for our final argument. We recently had occasion in the Joshua intervenors' application for a fee award to cite the official case docket - totalling 128 pages for the period from December 11,1989 to September 15,1995 - as evidence of the mammouth effort which has been undertaken by Joshua representatives, during the monitoring period following the Court of Appeals decision at the end of 1990. Roughly 10 days after the filing of our fee petition, and almost 5 years after the proposed dismissal date, LRSD filed the current motion - seeking an order under which the case would be treated as if dismissed for some purposes 5 years ago. We have to wonder if the timing of the motion relates to the Joshua fee petition in some way\nand we can only wonder because the defendants do not inform the parties or the court, by use of examples or otherwise, what would be accomplished by the motion, and what, if any, difference it would make. The court should not lend its power to the requested form of belated wand waving. Conciusion The motion should be denied. Neither the formulation which appears in the motion. at pages 2-3, nor the one in the memorandum, at page 1, is consistent with the language employed by the Court of Appeals in 1990 in reviewing the proposed settlement. The LRSD's argument based upon the opinion of the Court of Appeals concerning the milages does not justify the relief sought here. The 1990 opinion of the Court of Appeals did not address the matter of millages in a manner analogous to the matter of continuing Jurisdiction. 7moving papers are otherwise inadequate at this late date, given the insufficient explanation offered for the proposal. I Respectfully submitted, I JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (50U 374-3758 By\n^n W. Walker, Bar No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading has been served upon all counsel of record, by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail with sufficient postage prepaid, on this 18th day of December, 1995. /ohr?W. Walker 7 L 8 Arkansas Democnit ^(Jiazctte 22, 19QS-? Lawyer in case tells s judge not to toss desegregation suit mt XXA-^ BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Ownocrat-Gazette Education Writer r 3 attorney for tlie? District, ask^^\" Wnght Nov. 30 to end toe high-prbr. tile school case but to continue TXT ^sicsauou lawsuii, accnrrting (o at- Hicw Ibe thrM Pulaski CounlY\" toey Joto Walken irto black families m toe case. a u ' All three distncts are entitled-fo\n'\" :miceol ___ .. A federal judge should deny toe toiUe Rock School Districts request to dismiss its 13-year-old school desegregation lawsuit accordi^ to at- uidcx lamuies In a motion submitted to US ''Jabber WnghL Walker said toe districts request for dismissal includes little explanation or justificatioa He ----- said toe district failed to inform toe--------------------------------dismissal ot\". court by toe use of examples what hrjfZ overdue,\nwould be accomplished if the dis- dismissal from toe case as toe  language included in toe' 1989 financial settlement of ther case, Heller said at toe time he sub-^ der is at least four years overdue he said. T' lissal is granted. Heller called his request to tii\u0026amp;. judge both a housekeeping mea-' sure and a symbolic gesture to remind people that toe settlement agreement was supposed to end to^ Walker questioned toe motives of toe district He noted that toe motion for dismissal was filed 10 days after he filed a request for i* -i V -rr~vii/tuuuw~ S8O5.00O in legal fees from the three although toe districts had-'to,' ^^001 districts in- ---------------------- volved in the desegregation ! llQim J _: f 11 ,,,, , ------oJ case. We have to wonder if the timing of toe motion relates to toe Joshua meet specific desegregation obliga^ The Little Rock School Distri^ ^ , -------------xyiouiui -_________ accused Walker in rece\u0026lt;^- some way, said bying to impose new Walker, who represents toe Joshua P^'^bons on toe district  spedf-. ically in regard to the assignment^r  nla/*lr J_V  . intervenors, the class of black chU- dren and their parents in the de- , . ----------- segregation case, and we can only bergarten throu^ three, wonder because toe defendants do ~~~~~~------------ not inform toe parties or toe court by use ot examples or otherwise what would be accomplished by toe rnotiom and what if any difference it would make. The court should not lend its power to toe requested form of belated wand-waving, '* Walker quotes toe Sth U.S. Circuit Com of Appeals at St Louis rei^atedly on Wrights ongoing role in the case as a monitor to ensure that toe distact implements and complies with its desegregation plan. black teachers to jobs in grades' killQCPPSrtPn Mimii/rk 'A^iPublic school patrons should insist parties negotiate issues in good faith I 8Y KRISTEN BABER Special to the A/kansas Democrat-Gazette am the concerned parent of two children in the Little Rock Public Schools. Our school board and the other parties to the desegregation case enter^ into an agreement on a desegregation plan that was approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1991. To some extent we are inextricably bound by that agreement, except where, if changed circumstances justify it, the parties may compromise on modifications to the agreement I have been attending meetings between the parties to the desegregation case. These meetings are held in an attempt to agree on necessary modifications to the dese^egation plan, with minimal court involvement. I began to attend the meetings so I could understand the issues because I believe in public schools. I want to support them and I believe it is vital for our school district to get out from under court supervision. I believe in public schools because, more than any other public institution, they form the core of our communities. Our children receive benefits from attending school with a diverse population and everyone benefits from providing a good education to all. Court supervision is detrimental to the district in two ways: Too much money that should be spent on children is being spent on lasers, court costs and the office of desegregation monitorins and being in court means continued instability. Ail school patrons should attend these meetings and encourage the parties to negotiate in good faith and to get us out of court . The following comments are made to parties in the case.  Linda Pondexter, president of the Little Rock School Board: The meetings between parties have the potential for successful changes in the plan, but the meetings need a neutral chairperson. At the last meeting, Chris Heller, a lawyer representing the school district and John Walker, attorney for the Joshua Intervenors, appeared poised to agree on some issues. However, you were so convinced that Heller and the administration had conspired against you with the suggestion for a changed format for the meetings, you were a hindrance rather than an aid to negotiations. I realized then that we need a neutral chairperson\none who is flexible enough to hear suggestions without feeling threatened.  John Walker I support you in many ways. I want the Little Rock Schools to be integrated\nI want my children to go to school with children of all colors and backgrounds and I want the same for black children. I am afraid that your efforts are going to result in the opposite effect Private schools are gaining more students as this case drags on. Integration alone will cause some Commentary white flight, but your resistance to strong discipline in the schools and your unwillingness to compromise will cause the public schools to lose people who can afford private schools even though, ideally, they would choose an integrated school. You say that it is racial discrimination when the police are called when black children scuffle just as we all scuffled when we were youngsters. We all know that there are more fights now. more violence and certainly more guns and knives found on school property. I dont want children who have nowhere to go to be suspended. but I also dont want children who are chronically antisocial or are violent to be in the classroom with mine. When our schools are not perceived to be safe and well-disciplined, families who can afford private school will leave. The result is that the school system will become one of poor, disadvantaged students. You say that I and other white parents come to the meeting to seek special favors for our children. I doubt if Ill ever convince you otherwise. The only special favor I want for my children is for you to re-examine the perspective from which you view the involvement of white parents and children. Looking at the issues as white versus black will only aggravate, not heal, our wounds. We all need you to help effect a compromise that will allow a stable, s^e, disciplined and integrated school system. --------- .position for those who do not When you are being an advocate for black chil- c L, !**?- dren, remember that you do not stand alone. It {grated schools? That goal will not be reached by is the largely white PTA members at my chil-  drens area school who take children on field trips, provide tutoring and pay for an art teacher. Many of those resources would disappear if Little Rock were to become a one-race school system. I agree with you that it is unfair that so few black children are in the gifted classes in elementap^ schools. All children deserve those opportunities, but the court cases drain on school finances makes it that much harder to provide such opportunities to all children, Mr. Walker, please realize that I am not your enemy and neither are the majority of the white parents that I know. If you want to fight, attack the dragons that lead to more white flight  Ann Brown, desegregation monitor You have stated that factors that will draw white children to the district are on-time bus schedules and good curriculum. I have told you that I believe white parents want cooperation between the school board and the superintendent good curriculum and to be out of court You responded, I could not disagree more. You told me that you do not believe parents care about being in court When I recount that to parents, they laugh. Parents do care about on-time bus schedules, but more importantly they want good curriculum tau^t in a safe and stable environment where their tax dollars are spent on the students and not on lawyers fees nor your salary. The public perception is that there are too many in control of this case who are gaining financially from the ongoing litigation, What your comments reveal to me is that being out from under court supervision is not your primary goal. Does the district court realize that?  Dr. Henry Williams and Dr. Russ Mayo: The district needs to act in good faith, also. At the last meeting Pondexter repeatedly asked whether the district could provide a list of what parts of the desegregation plan had been complied with and what was left to do. Your response was always. Our employees are conducting interviews with a view to the hearing. That is no answer at all. I was surprised to learn that neither the school district nor the desegregation monitor knows which parts of the plan have been complied with. Does the district court realize that? What are the monitors monitoring?  AH members of the Little Rock School Board: None of the parents I know wants to change superintendents again. If Heniy Williams is so bad, convince us with facts. But realize this: the parents want a satisfactory compromise in the desegregation case. We^will rally support for those a members of the schck)l board who help find way to get us out of court and we will rally op-  Joshua intervenors: Is your goal safe, inte- I ArkansaTDemo^ C^azctk ] . SUNDAY, DECEMBER 24, 1995 this protracted court case and uncompromising positions that erode safety and discipline in the schools. Those factors are driving afHuent\npar- ents from the district sj\n*  Black and white parents: Our children-need us to speak up and say we dont want to sperid our tax dollars on lawyers fees and on th'e desegregation monitors salary, especially'when that monitor believes that parents arent concerned about the district remaining in court. What we do want is a school system where children of all colors and backgrounds can learn together. We parents need to remember that-iVis not just up to the court to solve the schools problems: it is also up to the school board we elect and the lawyers we have chosen to represent us. We want our schools to be about good education for all and we want our money spent toward that goal. Walker tells me that the state is constitutionally required to pay for public education and that there is no way the school system could go bankrupt\nbut he must know that if dire tactics are used, such as putting the district in receivership or consolidating the districts, affluent parents will leave in larger numbers than before. Walker also tells me that if I really want to help black youngsters I need to speak out fbr their rights in the community. This is mjc first step. Unless we agree on some modifications-and get out of court, this will be a one-race school \u0026lt; system and the children will be as segregated as ! when this suit was first filed. I Kristen Baber is a lawyer who Hoes in LiOle Rock.r-y TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1997 A I , L.I I I W| I  Cooyr^t O Little Rock Newsoaoers. Inc. j Arkansas Demcxn'at'i^(i^azettc I LR schools win a^eOof (iismissal\"tan suit Although vre can well under- Pulaski County districts and the stand the frustration the district state from the case. The state was BY CYNTHIA HOWELL settlement agreement among the will bring more into focus the fact underetanding ^at compliance ARKAiNSAs DEMocRAT-GAZETm three Pulaslti County districts and that a settlement apeement was monitoring would contmu . . The Little Rock School Distact the state that provided for the dis- reached to end the litigation, smd Wri^had denied the Little court has experienced over the dismi^d several ye^ ago, but The Uttle Rock School District the state mat provmeu lor uie u- 7,: Rod: totricts request for an or- years in carrying out our instate- the districts were not Ody the Litis entitled to be dismissed tom its missal. , ..  Hr nf di.^missai sadng that the tion, we conclude that the districts tie Rock distact raised the issue in .................... ''^T^eoking for the day'  haTbel r^akiSLt in motion should have been grant- 1995, but all three are expected to when all federal jurisdiction ends implementing its desegregation ed. - . der of dismissal, saying that the tion, we conclude that the districts  ------------------ -  1 motion should have been grant- looj, uuu on implementing us aesegregauuu cd, wrote U.S. Circuit Judge benefit tom the latest co^ order. plan. Ordering ffie dismissal could Roger Wollman of Sioux Falls, 15-year-old desegregation lawsuit --------------- ionU^ng^m appeak'rourt pan- matter and a symbolic reminder when dism^rould Roger\"Wollman'of\" Si^ Fails, \"But Woihnan also warned that 81 ruled Monday. that the 1989 settlement agree- and contro of the djstact retunm pl^Orde^me msmissai coma ger all three districts must continue to  A three-judge panel of the Sth ment ended litigation on desegre- usSpurpLe the judge As we held in our 1992 deci- implement desegregation plans 0.8. Circuit Court ofAppeals at St gation issues, leaving the courts to This is a small step m that direc- seivenou purp , j u8 terms of the settlement under Wright's supervision. Louis reversed a 1996 order by monitor and orfy thed^ tiom saim agreement became the law of the As the agreement specifically U-S.pistoct Judge Susan Webber tacts compliance with its desegre- moS the diSs desegrega- cSe, Wollman said. , SdMeXu^sl^^'or'^^^^ aSasSSs* gsaasassa the case despite language in a 1989 of what we do everyday, except it the desegregation lawsuit with the Court_______________________ The settlement agreement provided for the dismissal of all three See DESEGREGATION, Page SB Desegregation  Continued from Page 1B to comply with our instruction), to retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of Sie desegregation plans, he wrote. 7 He said the entry of a dismissal order will do nothing to relieve any of the three Pulaski County districts of their continuing desegregation obligations as listed in their plans. Any post-dismissal stance by the districts to the contrary, it i should be made clear, would subject them to appropriate sanctions and the granting of remedial relief to those adversely affected by the districts' refusal to honor their desegregation commitments. Wollman wrote the order on behalf of a panel that also included Chief Circuit Judge Richard S. Arnold of Little Rock and Circuit Judge Gerdld Heaney of Duluth, Minn. Attorneys made oral arguments in the case Feb. 25 in Little Rock.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_p15728coll3_424364","title":"Doris Matthis individual file","collection_id":"bcas_p15728coll3","collection_title":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","dcterms_contributor":["Matthis, Doris"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Dunbar High School, 34.73231, -92.28654"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1997"],"dcterms_description":["This folder contains documents and photographs donated by Doris Matthis.","This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : University of Arkansas at Little Rock Center for Arkansas History and Culture"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["National Dunbar Alumni Association historical collection, 1880-2016 (UALR.MS.0021)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Arkansas--Little Rock","Dunbar High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Education, Secondary","Segregation in education--Arkansas--Little Rock"],"dcterms_title":["Doris Matthis individual file"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15728coll3/id/424364"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_p15728coll3_430096","title":"Dunbar History Project materials","collection_id":"bcas_p15728coll3","collection_title":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1996"],"dcterms_description":["This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : University of Arkansas at Little Rock Center for Arkansas History and Culture"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["National Dunbar Alumni Association historical collection, 1880-2016 (UALR.MS.0021)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Arkansas--Little Rock","Dunbar High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Education, Secondary","Segregation in education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Class reunions"],"dcterms_title":["Dunbar History Project materials"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15728coll3/id/430096"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_996","title":"Educating Everybody's Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners: by Robert W. Cole, editor, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Educational innovations","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Educating Everybody's Children: Diverse Teaching Strategies for Diverse Learners: by Robert W. Cole, editor, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/996"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["books"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"tmll_hpcrc_68908255","title":"Enforcing civil rights in Alaska : who is handling the complaints?","collection_id":"tmll_hpcrc","collection_title":"Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Alaska, 64.00028, -150.00028"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Commission on Civil Rights. Alaska Advisory Committee"],"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["A digital version of the report published by the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","Requires Acrobat plug-in to view files."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights--Alaska"],"dcterms_title":["Enforcing civil rights in Alaska : who is handling the complaints?"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Thurgood Marshall Law Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":["http://www2.law.umaryland.edu/Marshall/usccr/documents/cr12c4911z.pdf"],"edm_is_shown_at":["http://crdl.usg.edu/id:tmll_hpcrc_68908255"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports","records"],"dcterms_extent":["21 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_430","title":"Exit Report (student)","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Exit Report (student)"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/430"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n(^rr-e.ci-e J 10/19/1995 14:24 5013242231 LRSD STUDENT ASSIGNM PAGE 03 /08/93 11:31:46 PAGE 1  Entry * Withdrawal Coda Entry/Withdrawal Description E AR CS DZ DO HS IE LR NO NP PO RE FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ARKANSAS CHANGE TO ENTRY RECORD FROM DETENTION FACILITY IN ARKANSAS FROM DETENTION FACILITY OUTSIDE ARKANSAS FROM HOME SCHOOL INITIAL ENROLLMENT THIS YEAR FROM ANOTHER LRSD SCHOOL FROM NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL OUTSIDE ARKANSAS FROM NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ARKANSAS FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL OUTSIDE ARKANSAS RE-ENROLL APTER EXIT SAME SCHOOL W AO ex DC DF ED EM EP EX EY FL GR ID LT ML MM MO MR NA NE NZ OT PC PG PS SC SI TI UN VD XH ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST CHANGE TO EXIT RECORD DECEASED assigned to a detention FACILITY EXEMPTED BY THE DISTRICT WITHDREW/EMPLOYMENT WZTHDREW/EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS EXPELLED BY THE DISTRICT END OF YEAR WITHDREW/FAILING GRADES STUDENT GRADUATED DUPLICATE ID LONG TERM SUSPENSION WITHDREW/ENLISTED IN MILITARY M TO M TRANSFER moved TO ANOTHER DISTRICT WITHDREW/MARRIAGE WITHDREW DUE TO NON-ATTENDANCE ON RECORD BUT NOT ENROLLED WITHDREW/LACK OF INTEREST OFFICIAL TRANSFER WITHIN DISTRICT PEER CONFLICT WITHDREW/PREGNANCY ENROLLED IN A PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLED/POST-SECONDARY SCHOOL WITHDREW/SERIOUS PERSONAL ILLNESS TRANSFER WITHIN DISTRICT/MOVED WITHDREW/UNIDENTIFIABLE REASON WITHDREW VOLUNTARILY/DISCIPLINE EXIT TO HOME SCHOOL Ji END O F REPORT10/19/1995 14:24 5013242281 LRSD STUDENT ASSIGNM PAGE 02 CORRECTED COPY Little Rock School District Exit Totals 1994-95 August 22, 1994-June 30, 1995 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS central jA fair'.............. hall MCCLELLAN PARKVIEW subtotal  JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Cloverdale DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MA8ELVALE\"2 \"\" MANN magnet\"' PULASKI HEIGHTS SOLITHWeST ~ SUBTOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS BADGETT BALE RELINE BOOKER MAGNET BRACY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT ____________ CLOVERDALE____________ DODO____________________ FAJR PARK FOREST PARK I aiL, i Ji T J\n' 21 1 1 ! 2. r FRANKLIN FVLflRIQHT GARLAND GEYgR SPRINGS GIBBS MAGNET jEFFSRSQN mabelvale MCOERMOTT meaooacliff MITCHeiX OTTER CRSgK PVIASKIH6IGWT5 RpHTSELt \" RQCKEFELLCT ROM! Ng STEPHENS  TERRY_________ ^*M(EFfELD WASHINGTON WATSON i^STERN HILLS ^iams'magnet i^ON WOORUFP SUB total .. ,......... TT 2! 1\n+ I 4- J- T I t I ^1- 10\nMU MM MO MR I NA NE Nl OT PC PG! PS 3C sr Tl I UN VP XHI TOT~| ..I JJZ___i 11 t29l 2 I 6l ... J..-. 7: 13\n2i 1: 1 '3' li 1 8 7 T I 73 66 I 3! 43\u0026lt; 7t| 37 TT^ 2** I SI If  st a isi I 4- I 1 I I t X + i X X T I i X 4___L 11 I 1  I i T X I t\" mi T 4I 11 I ORA ND TOTAL I 27 16 26i I' /WM ?___ t _1 I I 06 : ! 106' 24 i f f I ' I 'v.....f~- ?\n j-'T' I I I 106 1- 17 1 2 I 2i 379 54* Lil.. 1 103! 4 I 2 408' 88 I -n 1 J- 70 J 17\n\"si\" 17' I 9i 33' ? 8' 32 84. 18 dOl I I 1: 356 21'2  j I 276 l! 47 2 1188 , 1 ii e\nT X ad 74 sa 74' 1i 1 108\n3i 1,\n11 I __[ 5i iTTj' T . 20 3l T + 11 2 4* i X I i I I ! I T I L I t T t -X 11 I J 1 4. I X ! X T II I i II X 1 I X X I t X I I J. 1! 1 if 71 4' 81 41 I I T T t X 1* M 1 m-4 -U. z I 2l 2 2I I t X T I 144 SO 64 57 69 610 23 32 21 n\" 61 28 78 57 38 TT 25 20 30 23 44 50 43\n79 79: 10! 2^ 54 12 1$: 69! 60' 46 i -?5L 15\" 32f' IS** 1' 1240 1\n2229 I I X i + X 1 2 4 li I 1i 26. 2j It I I .21 J 1l 6 T + I I I \"if -'21- - f-. n 11 64* 901 94\" 55 961' $48 5 18* 35! 35i 2: 23i s: 31 i3i 7\n11! 591 13! 22, T Jasti 4\n___ *9i 11! Tl 4 . - -14 I T t 1 I X X T I X 'U 4i 7l I i2 , 24I 8j nl 32( T 36! 23f 17t 56$. t I\n1101 1521 58 4-Ji-, 'i I 34\n1! 1| I 1 T 4 T 1) i I ^f II .ji II i I- 11  199 140 n} p- ! It 210 11 42\n\"47 11 ( 119 139 176 I 133\n7\n1' 4l 11 7| 1360 St I 61 1 T I ' HI\nI ' I Ilf 4j TT JX T 11 sT 1! T nr I i! I 4f 11 10! L-Ll 1 I 1, X I I I 11 T + if 121 it 1J 6' 12 T~ I 3 2j 3? 1QI 3 2 1 '1 1 i 1201 2: t 21 1 I i 1| I I I 1 I rrr I 1 1 T H I 1\nilWl'iili' fl! 26$i 611 2! 21 I n li 1 f 1 T 1 TT 3 38 ~~46 38 ts 1?1 34 110 71  68 31 39 34 116 22 _5e 2S 72 103 ~i7 103 18 37 69 9 27 44 J. I I 1 88 81 72 60 56 41 I ! I 38 221 12i 2032 !___' 1181 1! 2l 4580 Rrp4r6 by AMLw10/19/1995 14:24 5013242281 LRSD STUDENT ASSIGNM PAGE 01 OfRCE of SwdENT AssiqNMENT SO! Sh^XMAN UnU Rock, AR 72202 Tlpltox SO I-724-2272 Fax SO I-724-2231 FAX COVER SHEET DATE TO -0 C) fyy Fax NiMbat, 3\u0026gt;'7l'-C) / 0 o FROM. SPECIAL INSJRUCTIONS // NUMBER OF PACES, INCLUDING COVER Arkansas Democrat W(5azcttc  WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1995 Extra 689 pupils straggle in at LR schools BY SUSAN ROTH Democrat-Gazetto Education Writer The Little Rock School District period last year, the district pulled 689 students out of a hat in gained 309 students. the last month, raising enrollment figures that initially showed dramatic losses. On Sept 1, the district recorded 24,233 pupils. On Oct. 2, the count was 24,922. Officials shrug, unable to explain the surge. The only thing I can think of is the districts official total that is, we feel that some parents dont will be filed with the state for persend their kids back to school un- manent records and for comput- til afl\ner Labor Day, said Snellen ing state education funds the dis- Vann, district spokesman. Were always up by the October count But not that much. In the same And some confusion remains over whether this years 24,233 September head count was taken before or after Labor Day. The forms used in the count are dated Sept. 5, the day after Labor Day. The October enrollment figure trict will receive. Compared with last years October enrollment, the district is down 309 students. Little Rock will not lose state funding this year because of the loss of students, but the numbers will count for next years state funding. In the coming budget process, the school district can expect to lose about $3,800 for every lost pupil  a total of nearly $1.2 million. But state officials have pointed out that the district is still among the richest in the state. It actually grows richer with the loss of students because the citys education tax levy remains the same regardless of enrollment figures, officials say. Schools that appear to have the largest enrollment declines since last October are Hall High School, which lost 103 students, or 10 percent of its population\nand Henderson Junior High, which lost 125, or nearly 14 percent. Both schools had a startling growth in violent incidents in 1993 and 1994. Little Rock continued its long- See SCHOOLS, Page 10A Schools  Continued from Page 1A time racial trend this year, growing steadily blacker. Last year, 64.9 percent of the districts students were black, compared with 66.5 percent now. The October figures showed 381 fewer white students and 112 fewer other students than a year ago. The number of black pupils rose by 184. Schools that had significant increases in the percentage of black population include McClellan Community High School, up by 43 to 80.4 percent black\nCloverdale Junior High, up by 6 to 86.5\nand Henderson, which lost 38 black students and 77 white students to increase to 78.6 percent black. Among elementary schools, Chicot Cloverdale, Fair Park, Fulbright, Meadowcliff, Wakefield, Wilson and Woodruff all increased their black populations more than 5 percent A report on students who left the district during the last school year shows that 2,^ moved to other districts, while 285 withdrew to private schools. The district had another 1,494 pupils on record but not enrolled A total of 4,580 students left for a variety of reasons during the course of the year, according to the report Little Rock Sehool EnroIJment J 64.9% 32.5% ^vhite Uack 1994 Total studoatK 25,231 if 2.6% other Figures taHen Oct 3,1394 31.3% white 66.5% black ^2^% other 1995 Total atudenti: 24,922 Figures taken Oo. 2,1995 Difference fran last yes' 200 o-J -200 Black +184 Down 309 students overall from 1994 White -aai other -112 -400 NOTE: ThosnamttloflnaKIgiirottbn school dbtilet sahmlts to the slots for ponnanent records and funding puposet. SOURCE LRSD Arkansas OemocratXiazette/UZ ROBERTSI Leave a system with so much? They wouldnt BY SUSAN ROTH AND CYNTHIA HOWELL Oemocrat-Gazette Stall Wrttefs One Saturday in the middle of her sixth-grade year, Melissa Rudder marched up to the principal at a Pulaski Heights Elementary School open house and asked to observe a class. She never went back to her private school. Penny and Patt Rudder moved their family into the Hillcrest neighborhood from a Houston See LRSD. Pane 8A I Arkansas Democrat W^azcttc SUNDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1995 Copyright 6 UWe Rodt Newspapers, Inc. I LRSD  Continued from Page 1A suburb the week before school started eight years ago. They didnt know a soul here. high school. It took her three weeks to catch up academically, Penny Rudder said. The deciding factor was academics a few years later when Christian chose a high school. riculum at private school. Melissa, now 17, is a senior at Central considering a myriad of i districts 12-year-old school de- it is those schools that have lost mentary, where her daughter is buc uiuoL as in sixth grade, and at Pulaski Little Rocks enrollment contin- Heights Junior High, where her son is an eighth-grader. At my first parent conference last year, sitting before us the most students this year as So many segregation case. times the administrations hands are tied by a court order. She said teachers and parents worked hard to try to close the disparity between black and white pupils' standardized test scores at Forest Park Elementary. While scores for white students in the Little Rock district are among the highest in the state and stack up well nt^- ues to decline. Parents still speak of positive college choices. Many families like the Rudders are growing more passionately vocal in support of the Little Rock School District in the experiences at Hall High, J.A. ence Fair High and Parkview Magnet in semicircle were my son s six High, and at Mann Magnet Ju-  This nior High and Dunbar Junior teachers, East related. The Rudders worried about re- ------------------ ports of violence, and several of face of dropping enrollments  Christians classmates decided especially a dramatic loss of Hi^. donl**put\\our*dmi2it*er' hi toe to attend Catholic High. white children in the last three public schools, PennyRudder recalled. They took toe advice, fearing the public schools from ^Christian wL fine at I^laski would have had to give up Span- thT'^laskTHeightso?Hiiicrest students, teachers and parents. neighborhoods, like the Rud- ^e?pS= eo^=a\n^^\noi\ntoe'-has\".... m ever made  chose Central. Christian, now 20, increased. nnaiitv Thpv sav Heishts and she acknowledged trate on those who need it mosL ever mane. ic a snnhnmnre at Harvard Uni- Teachers at some secondary is academic quality. 1 hey say tieignts, ana sne .. .Ea. nmhahiv lafcas Melissa encoimtered intoler- is a sophomore at Harvard uni frustration their children are far safer in that some may not be as safe. ant students and teachers who versi^. schools speax itn Little Rock schools than they are I know some things have failed to supervise at the school, The reason he was so well about a^^lack of omte at shoS  been handled very poorly by the SLi sx'\nisssx\"i's SiSUgjsa .k.'sskt\ns's,'?es.'^.'5n PTA i boUl Forest Part El. os.-E. sold, ret.^W to Ot. The few people we were able to meet said, Your son will be Une at Pulaski Heights, but is really strange, I thought at first. But we sat there and lis- We did check out private years. schools, and we found them to While many of L^e Rocks be academically much inferior elementary schools have active options, Rudder said. He parent ^oups would have had to give up Span-  neiKiiis duuiui ish and a year of math. was miserable. The Rudders call After companng course offer- But the most aggressive tened to a forum on our child, cheerleaders for the secondary what they each thought his schools have children at Pulaski strengths and weaknesses were. .......... Heights Junior High and Central It really bolsters the child as an pmeiii and abundant High School. They tend to be af- community support, the junior fluent white couples who five in U really ooioie.o me emm aa tioually, black studeuts gener- individual and as a student and ally score much lower than boosts communication among whites. ,-----1 \" We were just really concen- ! trating on those kids, East said. r Thats one of the reasons white is a sophomore at Harvard Uni- Teachers at some secondary is academic quality. They say schools speak with frustration their children are far safer in   - - --=- Little Rock schools than they are UUiei JUIllUi uisbb ovuwio --------- - -- , , in their not have the same atmosphere people dont go to the schools, found at Pulaski because teachers really concen- I cant deny that probably takes away a little bit from my child, who could read when she got in there. Like others, the Rudders said See KIDS, Page 9AArkansas Democrat (gazette Kids We want to be a  Continued from Page 8A pOSitive VOiCO for the they feel confident the district can schools in the turn around its problems one U/a a/cn school at a time. Parents mention COmmumty. rVe aiSO two programs. Vdunteeis m Public SChoolS Schools and Partners in Education, community. We also that help. The volunteers program encourages parental participation in the schools. Schools with few active parents to the mark and help them put together ways to evmuate and report how they are doing. Its should get more financial support J _ from the district and more active business partners, Penny Rudder \\ said. The Partners in Education pro- set them. We want pMieinOCCOC with fHp t SKSpSSarmSK themtobesuccessfuL rtal-world learning experiences and mentors for children and the school has sought to suspend or expel fewer students, he said. There has been one incident involving a weapon. School officials took an ice pick from a violent student during the first period on the first day of school j Washington believes his school is safe although he acknowledges that there have been problems on buses and at bus stops this year. While Washington, parents and many other school district leaders ' and cheerleaders frequently blame the media for Little Rocks image problems, the Rudders have another idea. What all the schools need, they saii is more support from Little Rocks political and business leaders, o The city business leadership is Scott Christie behind the schools, Patt Rud- ff M\u0026amp;rtha and Scott Christie, a west ^7, , L-rttteRock couplMecengr^ to 'ai^anize another association called Parents In Public Schools. der said. I think maybe they\\e giv- I think we will go from 30 people to 100, and from 100 to several thousand, said Scott Christie, a father of four and a global sales sup- SSIS'/SSKtoS wtu.(-\"-I. ____________ I en up on the school system. Its very she predicts that parents of some of difficult to get community leaders to her sons friends will opt for private step up and say Yeah, TU serve on . schools next year.________________the school board. We have to help S Lite other families, the Christies them realize its worth their while. say they will visit all the junior The way they will do that, they i highs to select one for their son and said, is to keep talking to people  then will involve themselves at the until were blue in the face.  in Jackson, Miss., and chapters across the country use Jackins One person who plans to work hard to recruit families like the charter and bylaws as models. J^es Washh^n, p^ There are three things this or- cipal of Henderson JimiOT High, the ........ school that got the worst rap last year. Washington looks back on last year and shudders. You dont have lor me scnouis m me eeumiumu,. to tell him that was not a We also want to hold the schools to goo^ear for his schwl. the mark and heln them put togeth-  Every day when I get to work, I ganization wants to accomplish, Christie said. We want to be a positive voice for the schools in the community. the mark and help them put togeth- to evaluate and report how think about what I was doing a year ago, he said. And what was he doing? Probably busting up a fi^t Even his mother in Hot Springs er ways they are doing. Its not that we are out to get them, he said in an aside. We want them to be suc- cessftil. worried about his safety. A 10-year district veteran, Wash- T7ie third thing we would like distnet veteran^. w^- to'de is understand the federal ington started work Sept 21,1994, at courts involvement in our school Henderson, replacii^ a principal who was transferred because of her syStem and see if there is not a way to get more local participation in decision-making in our schools. highly publicized disputes with the staff. Parents reacted to the problems Early participants in the group ------------ . have mostly been white parents with by send^ their children els\" children in schools on the citys west where this year. The enrolment of side. The group wants to expand its 917 at Henderson, the distnci s membership to include more black largest junior high l^t ye^, participants and representatives of dropped by 125, mostly white schools all over the city. pupils.   This year, 17 new staff members, leave me _______-__,___ including two new assistant princi- Martha Christie, who has a masters pals, have injected new energy, md degree in education firom Columbia there is more collegiality, Washing- University in New York City. I ton said. have a child going to junior high L We do understand why people the Little Rock district, said Last year's distractions are gone,I Arkansas Democrat ^(OazcUc SUNDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1995 Copyright O Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. k DRAIN ON THE DISTRICT Urban fears pose problem for Little Rock schools Many parents found they couldnt love LRSD and so were happy to leave it BY CYNTHIA HOWELL, CHRIS REINOLDS AND SUSAN ROTH Democrat-Gazette Staff Writers Last June, the White family sold their west Little Rock house nt n los.s, packed their beloiieings and left town. I he faniily moved to Cabot, a bedroom community of about 8,3(X) people northeast of Jacksonville. Now they have five acre.s of land and a two-stoiy house with an American flag in (lie front yard. a There's no shopping mall, and they have a half-hour commute to Little Kock. But (he White.s they did the right thing. The schools were the No. 1 say reason we moved, L......... .. _ i said. \"We wanted a better. rpasor ^hite safer environment for (he kids. Scores of families, particularly whites, have fied the majorityblack Little Rock School District for suburban or private schooLs fru.strating the districts desegregation efforts, ramifies who moved out say they found better teaching, discipline, buildings and supplies in other districts. T he,v also found lower taxes and less crime (han in Little Rock. The Whites never viewed private schools a.s a good alternative. \"Were adamant about using the public schools, not just fieeing to Pulaski Academy or a parochial school, Jim White said. So, when White to a x-w. i OU, wneil vvniie became fed nn ThaVUka n. . Arkansas Democrat-GazeltaDAVID GOTTSCHALK \u0026lt;'*s\u0026lt;^ipHne problems - mwed I?\"!- Brandon (left), 11, and Colin, 6 r f Seer,tv,P.gA I Arkansas Democrat ?9\u0026gt;(Bazettr. Family put its house up for sale and got out of Dodge  Continued from Pans 1A _______ __________________ Page in Little Rocks public schools, he took his family to Cabot Brandon White, 11, was enrolled in Terry Elementary in west Little Rock after the family moved to Arkansas from California. Brandon and his younger brother, Colin, a kindergartner at the time, transferred to Fulbright Elementary the next year. At Fulbright. Brandon was moved nearly every day to sit next to a child who was misbehaving. Jim White said. The boy was used as a role model for a bad student But the concept backfired, and Brandon went home with a bad attitude and foul language. My kids are not there to be teaching other kids how to behave themselves, White said. In Cabot they expel kids. They dont sacrifice the majority for the rights of the minority. And, regardless of integration efforts. White felt a cultural gap remained between poor black inner-city children and west Little Rock middle-class white children. Brandons fourth-grade teacher at Fulbright didnt speak proper En^ish, White said The teacher didnt seem to check homework or show concern that homework was completed, and she could not control the students, he said White and other families criticized the Little Rock disWct and measuring THE DROP IN SEARCH OF SAFETY --------- ... many otn- * lu mierviews that would have paid had they reason not to go back to LitUe ers have taken the same ao- diey bailed out of the LitUe Ropk P'odjor private schools - an op- Rock.\" said Blck Lafferty, M Droach Tha diehenF . w. onihA/xic p tioD, uicy considered. In the last six years, many oth- 5 havA Pole.*.. 4.U_ . Parents said in interviews that same ap- ***'-'* UA uuB ijime nocs Si n ' has reported s'I\u0026gt;ols m the last few years rnain- eyollment losses each of those better and safer facill- yean, exc^tforagainof552stu- to , Paula Launius, for example, \"w.  lost 618 Stu- yed 15 months ago from the .U A.SP.PP'^ on student exits for school year shows that 4^ students left the LitUe Rock schools during the year 18 ner- cent of the enrollment Wlule Uie report does break dom the staUsUcs by race, ft does offer figures to 28 cate- h? po'ftding those assigned io detenUon faciliUes (28 pupils) and dropouts (68). for spending tOT much energy and 49 perreto^or 22M toto desegrogauon and n't heir eh.J.-.. VBO J ':~ luiioiosiu- AU luuuuis aeo trom thp wtoto neighborhood in South- districts west Little Rock to Cabot with her Mike, and their two ele-  steady 64 per- mentary school-age sons, Rick, 12. cem black to percent black. and Timmie, 6. They now lire to ...^^^i'n?'*t\"etis66per- walking distance of both Soth- St and Cabo?ju- ment fell by 309 students, and nior High schools. ofwh'itTwJL^^SlToSi^^^ abo\\f.r''^ a'' gam in black students to the W ^O-to six years, the schools tost 1S \"\"\"\"te' 'a. .... students, or 4 percent of enrollment But the loss of white pupils numbers 1218, or 4.7 percent Distoct officials say they cant reasons families iMve. But they are starting to track some trends, in keeping mto a promise they made IM ^y live in not Superintendent Henry Williams \"Dr. Williams is a politician ... a., sninon,. and is trying to get tilings accom- whether they moved pushed, White said. \"But theyre the schroK tor just strangling the teachers with a new job to MothTS'**  no money, no supplies. , Another i tle^R \"t ftioted but?ever shoUfui'fo? tie Rock  a young, energetic  P black woman  was excellent, class. Officials dont know why the Whites said. But she became About 6 percent, or 285 frustrated with district adminis- students, said they had switched trators and the school principal private schools. and took a job in the private sec- ask students tor e next year. The physical condition of the school also was deplorable, White said. So we decided to put our house up for sale and get the hell out of Dodge, White said. Out here, its hometown USA. school. Their son is in second grade\ntheir daughter is 4. It was a wonderftil school, Lieblong said, but it was not your standard school in Little Rock. agent with Liber^ Real Estate in Bryant He sard his company sells to many families who leave Little Rock for various reasons, includ- They dont even want to go Rick had to work a little harder at his new school, his mother said. But the family found the school more orderly, a result of more restrictions and more incentives for good behavior. And. unlike Little Rock, Cabot allows corporal punishment in schools, giving teachers an additional tool for maintaining order, she said. Parent involvement also is high in Cabot, which Launius said was different from what she saw ... ------ - The problems in the Little back to shop there, Lafferty said. Rock district stem from societal Theyre just sick of it They want problems, Lieblong said. Working a little bit of old Americana. parents, single parents and ne- In the early 1970s, the first few giectftil parents pour undisci- years of forced busing in Little plined children into Little Rock Rock, many families moved out of schools, he said. Pulaski County, but several ---------- --------- Tlie/re fighting a losing bat- Saline County school officials tie. I just think its broken, and said white flight had slowed in re- they dont know how to fix it I cent years.----------------------------------dont think they can fix it I dont 40-mtoute?ommut7,'\nhl^rf''hl'' me ao \"Bryant is not growing like Con- think they can make parents husband way and Cabot,\" said Danny care,\" he said. LitUe Rock and  wealth of volunteers leaves them Spadoni, principal of Bryant High Lieblong said he wanted to We wmiSd toT r '\"tribute. School. Eight or nine years ago, we support the Little Rock school areata bSe? *5 Rick, now a seventh-grader, had a lot coming from the metro- but his children come first Launius, a nurse. I wSi we had Sd'? htoT nnd wtoto Pit\"\" \"t\"-tt\"!so much now.\"  .7, ,,3^ people tell me that if I moved here five years ago. We love there^^e atentoges CHIUHIEN COME FIRST left I wouldnt be helpi^ the situ- It ................* -T,_____J r i.Li____ation, he said. But its the an- Launius, 39. has no regrets in Little Rock. If parents dont ifa Fka on . . sign up early in the year to do tasks at the Cabot schools, the Launius had nothing but praise for Little Rocks Mabelvale Elementary and its teachers. Thats where her son Rick attended kindergarten through fifth grade  except for second grade when he went to Washington Mae- net Elementary. But the fear of junior high, particularly of youth gangs and the need for metal detectors to scan chitoen for weapons, scared the family into leaving the ci^. Launius, a LitUe Rock native called the meUl detectors \"a wake-up call to her at a time when Rick and his friends were talking more and more about* gangs. Rick came home one day almost in tears asking, How am I going to make it with the gangs?  his mother said. scan We honestly did not move here to get away from blacks. It was for a safer community and better schools, Launius said. She described her new home as a relaxing, small, country town populated with friendly people_a town where she can send her children off to school with a minimum of worry. The familys new red-brick house has about 300 more square ^t of space and cost about 530,000 more than their Little Rock home. The monthly house payment increased by about $100  much less than the tuition the There is a lot less cussing at ...... Tom and Mary Lieblong chose this school, he said. You dont Cabot when they decided to leave have to be scared about violence. Little Rock. The property values If I went to junior high at Mabel- in Benton and Conway had skyvale. right now I would feel so rocketed because of population worried every day at school I growth. would try not to mess with some people. I just wouldnt have anything to do with some people. Tom Lieblong said the family decided to move to Cabot while land prices were still affordable. Other nearby districts have When he first moved to Cabot, seen an influx of Little Rock fam- Lieblong made a 50-minute com- Ilies over time, but ofilcials in mute to an insurance sales job in Benton and Bryant said few, if Little Rock He is now trying to any, families moved there recent- establish a client base in Cabot ly from Little Rock because of the - - -.................. The Lieblongs moved after schools. In fact Bryant and Ben- their son completed kindergarten ton enrollments declined this fall. at Little Rocks Jefferson Elemen- School principals, real estate tary in 1994. The family sold their agents and parents said they Kingwood home near Cantrell knew couples who moved before Road and Mississippi Street for a they had children or when their new country house and what they children were Infants, fearing the believed would be a better educa- schools before their children en- tion system in Cabot tered them. Others came from Like the Launius family, the other parts of Arkansas or out of Lieblongs didnt have any probstate and chose to avoid Little lems with their child's elemen- Rock altogether. tary school but worried about the We get a lot of people who, future  junior and senior high once they move out here, look for   swer for me. DISAPPOINTZD IN MSCIPUNE Little Rock lawyer John Moore moved his family out of west Little Rock a little more than a year ago, not because of the schools, but for a new house in west Puias- k County. After the move. Moore's oldest son continued to attend Little Rocks Henderson Junior High Schoolfor a while. He started this year at Arkansas Baptist School I dont want to slam the district, said Moore, who was president of the Little Rock School Board in 1992-93. But, the main reason we left was because, while I heard the administration talk about a strict discipline policy, I never saw it get down to the school. My son was tired of being in classes where teachers spent most of the time trying to maintain discipline. Im almost embarrassed to say I dont have any kids in the district, even though I dont live there anymore, Moore added. . But my boy actually made the re-  quest to change.\nHenderson lost 125 students, 14 percent, this year and more than any other school in the district The exodus followed a troubled year that included a controversial midyear change of principals and a steep increase in violent incidents. Moore said he believes Principal James Washington is working hard to improve student behavior, and he feels Henderson is a safe school. Moores niece continues to attend Henderson.-I I- - 'J Arkansas Democfat-GazettaSTcPHEN 9. THORNTON But Moore also believes teach-', ers and the principal didnt have the authority they needed last\" year to deal with the troublemak-I ers. There were students at Henderson who shouldnt have been, in a regular public school, said! Moore, who was a frequent visitor to the school and its classrooms. Moore said Washington would! beg district administrators to get. those students out of his hiiilrling, Some were removed for awhile.. but returned at the beginning\nof? the new semester to cause more problems. tziiMfr, Dale Gunter, an engineer wjth  the citys public works depMt , ment said he moved his 14-yeary old son, John, from Hendersonrto-. Robinson Junior High in the Pu-'\nu.ski County Special School Dis- People would just hit me, jump me, simply because youre white, happened all the time. The education theyre trying to sve you is good, but the fear tand of distracts you. I was so unhappy there, I didn't care about my grades anymore. Im 6-l,:.-\n'I60 pounds, and I was terrified. I doirt partcularly like to fight i\n,... At Robinson, the princip^ doesnt give you any slack no matter what color you are. The teachers have the guts to stand up to students. .At Henderson, the teachers are scared of being shot up. II UI'.' Gunter is frustrated because he wants to support the Little Rock schools. His stepdaughter is now in seventh grade at Dunbar and has had no problems so far, he said. tne: to escape the climate of fear a -. J u.  to try to stick with public scho'o'ls Both his son and stepdaughter, j-.i-   . One of the reasons we chose attended Fulbright Elementary. They had nothing but positive'^ experiences, Gunter said. When it was time to choose a' junior high, the family investigated six different schools, including, private and parochial schools.' The promise of a specialty in health sciences attracted them to. Henderson because it fit Johns.' career interest in physical thera-, py. I felt his educational opportu-. nities would be better at Header^, is that, as a public official. I feel a community is no better than its school system. Gunter said. My personal feeling was that I had an obligation to the city to try to set an example. We really tried. And there are good schools. But they have to get a grip on discipline and security. My sou will stay at Joe T. Robin- son for high school. He's theyve lost one I tri lEU-, O. I nWOII I ------- ------------ ----. --------------.  Tea^ Beisr Henderson (rigM) tells Henderson Junior High Principal James being expelled. The school lost 125 students this year after a sharp increase last private schooisi Washington of the improved attitude of a student who had returned to class after year in violence and discipline problems The first year at Henderson Moore said his advice to the school district is unchanged since the days when he was on. the board: Follow the student TUte S'- 3^\n2yjqw BUCK -153 book to the letter, and. when students continue to misbehave,4st was satisfactory, Gunter said..Buti them out of the school. Give the the school fell apart last .yasat- teachers the auonty to act to get and, though Washington stabifp those students out lized it the damage was already, Moore isnt as involved in his done. he said. sons new school as he was with the There was a distinct, dual set ...... ~ little Rock schools. But his son gOE wffiM xjom OIHER .251 of rules for discipline for white,, likes Arkansas Baptist, is doing well versus black students, he said. ., academically and participates in John said it made him mad tO\nextracurricular activities. I * kzn see blacks with drugs get ex-n We go to the football games, peiled, then return to school thert Moore said. My boy plays footnext week, while a white student^ ball. Its the way school used to go SOURCE. jOeAccx Senoo Qstci Afkartsas Oemocral-Gazene/UZ ROBBTTS caught in horseplay would get suspended for two or three wee!is,i He said black students could even,\nwear things whites couldn't be.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_466","title":"Facilities Implementation Planning Committee","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School management and organization","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Facilities Implementation Planning Committee"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/466"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District r*\" November 8, 1995 NOV 15 1995 Ms. Ann Brown 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR Office of Oea\nDear Ms, Brown: 72201 The Superintendent and the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District has reqpiested that I extend an invitation to you or your representative to participate in an Implementation Planning Committee that is being drawn together to analyze the recommendations of the 1995 Facility Study and to put together implementation plans for those recommendations that are approved by the Board of Education. Our first meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m., November 9, 1995, in the office of Student Assignments. I apologize for the short notice for that meeting and if you are unable to attend because of this short notice, copies of agendas and minutes and any other documents generated as a result of that meeting will be forwarded to you. Should you have any questions concerning this invitation, please feel free to contact me at 570-4020. Sincerely yours, Djpugllps C. Eaton DIRECTOR FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCE/apl/invite 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000Little Rock School District J k- f NOV I 51995 Office of Desegregdiion vudy November 10, 1995 Ms. Melissa Guildin Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Ms. Guildin: The second meeting of the Facility Study Implementation Planning Committee will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, November 17, 1995, in the Little Rock School District Board Room, 810 West Markham Street. At this meeting we will be continuing our general discussion of the Facility Study and will be trying to define the scope and purpose of the committee and the general plan areas, most respectfully requested. Your attendance is A sincerely yours, D^glas'C. Eaton DI^CTOR FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCE/apl/fsm 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000MINUTES: IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 9, 1995 The Facility Study Implementation Committee had their first meeting on November 9, 1995. attached hereto. In attendance were the individuals as listed The meeting began with a general discussion of what the charge was of the committee. We considered and discussed the following areas: Committee Membership - Recommendations were solicited for additional committee members that may be able to serve and provide guidance and research in developing an Implementation Plan. 2. We discussed the draft, scope and purpose of the Committee and decided that this would be an item to be reviewed and finalized at our second meeting. There was a brief overview by Mr. Eaton of the Facility Study which prompted many questions and discussion. We discussed the Implementation Plan outline and began looking at responsibilities. We discussed the considerations. draft Implementation Plan 1. 3 . 4 . 5 . a Dr. Russ Mayo gave the group a brief overview of the Facility Study as it affects Student Assignments. He also answered many questions dealing with the general perceptions of the Study and explained to the members present how student assignment policies generally work and how children are assigned throughout the District. Our next meeting will be Friday, November 17, 1995, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board Room. DCE/apl/minutesDCE/apl/ic Mr. Doug Eaton Director, Facility Services, LRSD 3601 South Bryant Little Rock, AR 570-4020 72204 Ms. Sue Strickland 19 Pear Tree Place Little Rock, AR 374-0123 Work 455-1843 Home 72209 Ms. Melissa Guildin Office of Desegregation Monitoring, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 376-6200 72201 Mr. Skip Marshall Office of Desegregation Monitoring, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 376-6200 72201 Mr. Fred Smith Manager of Support Services, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2003 72201 Mr. Xanier Heard Alltel Information Services 4001 Rodney Parham Road Little Rock, AR 220-5370 72205 Mr. Sammy Mills 7 Conifer Place Little Rock, AR 568-4727 72209 Ms. Diane Vibhakar 3917 South Lookout Little Rock, AR 661-8030 72205 Ms. Suellen Vann Director of -Communications, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2020 72201Ms. Sadie Mitchell Assistant Superintendent, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2007 72201 Dr. Vic Anderson Assistant Superintendent, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2005 72201 Mr. Charles A. Johnson, Jr. 3907 American Manor Little Rock, AR 565-5715 72209 Ms. Betty Mitchell 107 Detonte Drive Maumelle, AR 372-3519 72113 Ms. Linda Young New Futures, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2112 72201 Ms. Margaret Gremillion Assistant Superintendent, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2006 72201 Mr. Leon Modeste Special Assistant to Superintendent, LRSD 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2011 72201 Dr. Russ Mayo Director, Office of Desegregation Monitoring 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 324-2271 72201 Mr. John Walker 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Rochelle 401 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201c s Si Little Rock School District November 10, 1995 Ms. Melissa Guildin O^ce HU'I 0^ - '\\ l l Oese9'eaa^'\" VlO'!^-^' ..4 ODM 201 E. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guildin: The third meeting of the Facility Study Implementation Planning Committee will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, December 1, 1995, in the Little Rock School District Board Room, Street. 810 West Markham Your attendance is most respectfully requested. Siijicerely yours. l^bgras C. Eaton ELECTOR FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCE/apl/fsm 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)824-2000a '0 MINUTES IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 17, 1995 NOV ^7 /995 OlficQ of ^ssegreg. luui t^oiwomig The Facility Study Implementation Committee had their meeting on November 17, 1995. as listed attached hereto. second In attendance were the individuals The meeting began with a general discussion of the scope and purpose as outlined in our first meeting. There were essentially no comments with regard to the scope and purpose. meantime, until is formally approved by the committee, we will work For the under the charge of the draft, scope and purposes outlined in our first meeting. The second Considerations. item discussed was Implementation Planning A significant addition will be made to the Implementation Planning Considerations to include the securing of public support or any aspect of the recommendations made by the committee. Other discussions centered around the following items: A discussion that we outline committee objectives so that everyone has a clear understanding of what is to be A. accomplished. That a Neighborhood Association list be compiled by committee members so as to insure that we are including the associations in our public meetings at our schools. B. C. Discussions ensued regarding how we structure the committee, how we divide into sub committee's in order to analyze our charge. D. How do we develop a program that clearly emphasizes and supports the strategic plan as adopted by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors? E. Suggestions were made to form a sub committee on how to market the Facility Study to the general public, addition, a list was requested identifying where various copies of the Facility Study are located. In F. Fred Smith gave a briefing and commented on the planning and budget time lines which are Dr. Mayo and Mr. presently being pursued by the District and how the recommendations of this Committee tie in with the budget procedures.Page Two Continued Copies of the District Facility Plan are located at the following locations: 1. 2 . 3 . 4 . 5. Office of Student Assignments (Full Copy) Director of Communications (Full Copy) Manager of Support Services (Full Copy) Office of the Superintendent (Full Copy) Director of Facility Services (Full Copy) Copies of Volume I, Executive Summary, and Volume II, Demographic Analysis are located in the following offices: Office of Human Resources Office of the Federal Court Office of Desegregation Monitoring Attorney for Knight Intervenors Attorney for Joshua Intervenors North Little Rock School District Pulaski County Special School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents Office of Neighborhood and Planning, City of Little 1. ( 2. ( 3. ( 4. . 5. . 6. 1 7. 8. ( 9. I Rock 10. 11. 12 . 13 . Office of Judge Susan Weber Wright Department of Education, State of Arkansas Office of Procurement Each Board Member, Little Rock School District Board of Directors Our next meeting will be at 9:00 a.m., December 1, 1995, Board Room. in the DCE/apl/ininutes2Planning and Budgeting Time Line JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 1 PROGRAM INVENTORY 2 PROGRAM EVALUATION I I 3 NEEDS ASSESSMENT I 4 GOALS I I 5 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT I I I 6 BUDGETING I 7 LZ I I I I I I I I MONITORING A REPORTING I I I I I I I I I I I 0 REASSESSMENT OF PLANNING PROCESS A ORGANIZA IION 5 Little Rock School District 1RECEIV an y SCHEDULE OF NOV 1 7 1995 PARENT MEETINGS FOR FACILITIES STUDY^**'' ^sresaticn Mon AND BOARD MEMBERS FOR THOSE SCHOOLS 1. November 29, 1995 3. December 14, 1995 Pulaski Heights Elementary 6:00 p.m. (Judy Magness) Jefferson Elementary 6:30 p.m. (Judy Magness) 2. December 12, 1995 4. January 9, 1996 Mabelvale Jr. High 6:00 p.m. Woodruff Elementary 6:00 p.m. (Sue Strickland) (Michael Daugherty)/ JUL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Planning and Budgeting Time Line NOV 1 I 1995 \"J -nicR of Daseyreyaiiori Moruoimy AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG PROGRAM INVENTORY PROGRAM EVALUATION I I NEEDS ASSESSMENT I GOALS I I PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT I I I BUDGETING I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING \u0026amp; REPORTING I I I I I I REASSESSMENT OF PLANNING PROCESS * ORGANIZATION I I I 3 I LHUe Rock School District I RiCEIV^n OK 2 7 1995 Little Rock School District Office of Desegregajiofl Monitonrig December 21, 1995 Ms. Melissa Guilden 201 E. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guilden: The sixth meeting of the Facility Study Implementation Planning Committee will be held at 6:00 p.m. on January 3, 1996 in the Little Rock School District Board Room, 1996, 810 West Markham Street. Your attendance is most respectfully requested and should you not be able to attend, it is requested that you contact the undersigned prior to the meeting. you not I wish to take this opportunity to ask the committee members to teview the scope of work and the charge of this committee. tendency to be side tracked the last two meetings Oxx j-ooxxca that parallel our charge, but which we are allowing to overshadow our real intent. We have on issues The scope and charge of the Implementation Planning Committee is to analyze the Options in the Little Rock School District Long Range Facility Study to determine whether or not they can be implemented, and if so what other steps to take for implementation. It is not our charge to determine whether or not we agree or disagree with the Options, but rather to use our knowledge to determine what the advantages and disadvantages of the various Options are so as to be prepared to make a recommendation to the Superintendent and Board Education on an Option and what other steps to take for implementing the Option. an Option steps Long Range Beginning with our January meeting, we must focus more on the Option which was determined to be studied by the committee which is Option M Modified Junior High School and determine the steps of implementing that Option. various See you at our next meeting... Sincerely yours. Dd g s C. Eaton DCE/apl/ipcmeet DIRECTOR FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000MINUTES RECEIVED DEC 2 7 1995 - IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE Office Of DesefliegtUion MoiWerii'U DECEMBER 20, 1995 The Facility Study Implementation Committee held their fifth meeting on December 20, 1995. The meeting began with comments in regard to the December 13th Minutes. A typographical error was noted and references to Option M in those minutes should reflect that Option M deals with the Junior High Schools and not the High Schools. 1. Special Report Hightower and Ms. Van Light. Public Meetings, Mr. Robert A special report was given by Mr. Hightower and Ms. Light regarding the District's public meetings at Mitchell Elementary, Wakefield Elementary and Jefferson Elementary, with regard to specific comments: Mitchell Elementary comments centered around concerns of intercity schools being closed and that facilities would be allowed to decay. This was the concern around the community that this could be the circumstance with regard to Mitchell. Indications were that the Little Rock School District does not have a good tract record disposing of its intercity schools. All other concerns and statements during the Mitchell meeting were of the same general nature. With regard to Wakefield Elementary, Wakefield, as was Mitchell and Jefferson, was well attended. Members of the City Board (Ms. Adcock, Ms. Joyce and Ms. Wyrick) were present. The concerns at Wakefield centered around the recognition that Wakefield very much considers itself to be a neighborhood school that should not be touched because it was successful in attracting students from its own neighborhood and that the District needed to be more positive in managing its assets as opposed to preparing for restructuring. In addition, concerns were expressed with the possibility of expanding the school and its utilization to support community initiatives by increasing the building and possibly bringing outside entities into our school to operate and that they should be a consideration when schools are looked for possible downsizing. Jefferson Elementary School comments centered around the general building concerns and the future plans for the school in the area. There was many positive comments with regard to the retention of our Superintendent, Dr. Henry Williams. There was also demographic concerns via questions asked as to where children may be reassigned. Concerns raised over the criteria used to establish schools would be considered for restructuring during downsizing and what positive steps the community and the District might take to reserve the trend of decreasing enrollment. meetings are being accepted, primarily on The public a very localized basis\nalthough, the intent is to inform thegeneral public of the overall condition of the District and its direction with regard to student enrollment and demographics. must continue to be stressed. The localized situation in each school 2. Special Report Dr. Middle Schools, Dr. Vic. Anderson. Anderson, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools, gave the committee a briefing on the Middle School Concept. His talk centered around the educational development throughout the nation which thrives on the concept of Middle Schools by stressing community involvement and an active learning in grade grouping as trends for academic achievement. He indicated that the committee, which has worked over a year on the Middle School Concept, appears to be gathering support from the general populace for different grade configuration within the Little Rock Schools. A definite date for implementation or recommendation to the Board has not been made. within this school year. The recommendation is expected to be made We briefly discussed the committee composition and a list of permanent committee members was distributed to all that were present. These are committee members who were requested to serve on the committee or were nominated to serve. Committee membership covers the wide breadth of experience and concerns and should give the committee a broad base on which to conduct its business. A draft Implementation Planning Sub Committee recommendation was presented so that the committee could discuss how it could subdivide to ensure that the multitude of areas necessary to be considered in studying Option M would be achieved. Committee members were asked to volunteer for the various sub committees. It is hopeful that the sub committees will be finalized by our next meeting. A draft recommendation to the Superintendent based on the desires of the committee from previous meetings was presented. In essence, the recommendation stated that the pursuit of Option M Junior High Schools for possible implementation during this school year was not possible. committee members. This draft recommendation brought much discussion from Discussions centered around public involvement in the process and whether or not the committee could solidify the support necessary for these recommendations. We voted three (3) times on whether or not we would make a recommendation to the Superintendent and ended up dead locked in that no majority could be determined as to whether or not to recommend the pursuit of Option M. Our next meeting is scheduled for 6:00 p.m., January 3, 1996 in the Board Room, 810 West Markham. DCE/apl/minutes5eouNnrju I T I W,. .\u0026lt; ^Utu IhM el School CompoMon Auguo(21.1M u9U3f 23. 1995 I I I August 21, 1996 I T Central HS FairHS HallHS McClellan HS Parkview HS Magnet Sub-Total w/o Magnets Cloverdale JH Dunbar JH Forest Heights JH Henderson JH Mabelvale JH Mann jH Magnet Pulaski Heights JH Southwest JH Sub-Total w/o Magnets Badgett Bale Baseline Booker Magnet Brady Carver Magnet Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Carland Ceyer Springs Gibbs Magnet Jefferson______ King Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell otter Creek Pulaski Heights Pightsell Rockefeller Romine Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Magnet Wilson woodruff Sub-Total w/o Magnets Grand Total vtio Magnets u 5 899 591 565 663 411 3129  3 508 214 243 167 361 o  O 41 9 32 11 40 a .0 1448 814 840 841 812 27181 1132 14931 1331 4735 93I 3943 501 433 484 603 306 439 431 381 61 268 152 154 107 362 315 73 9 18 11 14 13 23 9 13 35781 14921 1101 571 719 647 771 426 824 755 467 5180 u m 62.09% 7260% 67.26% 78.83% 50.62% 6530% 68.93% 87.74% 6022% 74.81% 78.21% 71.83% 53.28% 57.09% 81.58% 69.07% u n 978! 508 554 654 453 3 595 116 191 111 351 e  O 45 11 25 15 34 a o 1618 635 770 780 838 u a m 60.44% 80.00% 71.95% 83.85% 54.06% o (8 o o a a a O 31391 11301 87| 43561 7206% 1531 233 236 313 243 319 338 365 187 208 40| 75 64 243 110 281 89 59 91 1 20 7 24 24 18 6 7 7 53i 10 1841 214) 12| 365 247 219 216 165 209 287 282 151 121 253l 121 2 191 68 122' 131 281 Ot 2181 141 1^ 31 1941 328 307 580 xn 618 433 431 285 271 410 392 512 240 289 300 497 519 412 78.87% 71.04% 76.87% 53.97% 64.46% 51.62% 78.06% 84.69% 65.61% 76.75% 44.88% 93.11% 48.24% 9125% 74.74% 55.00% 4205% 5530% 68.45% 2511 2131 201 305 229 132 176 190 229 218 228 94! 51 183! 01 01 71 191! 171 5i 1071 3! 17! 3541 65! 121 2771 261 411 21! 4231 2071 32! 3291 206 253' 290 154' 741 1041 7! 3! 2231 16l 74 771 91 ir 4841 51.86% 3991 76.44%, 234 322 384 198 353 295 531 416 662 410 313 492 373 239 97.86% 40.99% 45.83% 95.96% 64.87% 73.90% 42.94% 85.10% ' 63.90%  80.24% ' 65.81% ' 51.42%  77.75% ' 64.44% ' 87361 4345! 4191135001 64.71% 76861 34761 3481 115101 66.78% 154431 73301 6621 234351 65.90%, 135431 57381 5281 198091 68.37%i 31471 13641 130 26941 10131 96 46411 67.81% 38031 70.84% 4761 411 420 550 315 460 438 353 44 271 121 100 114 355 304 68 21 33 9 16 6 20 8 12 541 715 550 666 435 835 750 433 87.99% 57.48% 7656% 8258% 72.41% 55.09% 58.40% 81.52% 1891! -273 9541 -319 1291 -521 1199^ -419 10001 -162 6335! -1694 5335  -1532 868, -327 812: -97 858! -308 907! -241 614! -179 850! 745 -15 5 34231 1377| 125| 4925 | 6950% 29631 10221 1051 4090! 72.44%| 163 246 226 304 225 293 361 406 148! 1781 36 82 48 239 91 264 119 49 84 451 2081 226! 3981 21 1 19 7 26 43 20 27 10 4 7 5 9 200 347 281 569 359 577 507 465 236 81.50% 70.89% 80.43% 53.43% 6267% 50.78% 7120% 8751% 6271% 737 -304 6391 -1466 5541 -1451 257 401 390 656 -57 -54 -109 -87 467 -108 2301 77.39% 2451 230 11 234i 3 641 16 5 1571 122| 10 201 '317? 2831 282 241 9 19 96! 10 439 428 486 253 284 289 492 577 47.38% 9299% 50.41% 92.49% 75.70% 54.33% 40.85% 54.94% 265i 193! 19 263! 2231 77! 7 128i 165i oj 1 71 2331 197! 19 aef 224? 205| 4! 4 127! 22 76! 17 217! 2611 23 3651 29| 17 414| 2301 47 3571 207! 79 91 2571 221 269! 183! 52 761 11 2 22 13 8 3891 72.75% 4771 55.56% 347! 75.79% 230 i 96.96% 300! 42.67% 4491 51.89% 224 ! 96.43% 3731 60.05% 2981 68.79% 501! 43.31% 4111 88.81% 691! 59.91% 447! 79.87% 300 ! 69.00% 5001 51.40% 334! 80.54% 267! 68.54% 613 558 492 328 351 399 434 540 298 328 353 492 728 515 517 465 298 351 374 258 469 487 515 492 -36 -51 -27 -92 -121 40 -6 -54 45 -44 -64 ____0 -151 -126 -40 -118 -68 -51 75 -34 -96 -189 -14 -81 836. -145 492! 328! 5171 394i 324! -45 -28 -17 60 ' -S7 88341 42261 4971 13557! 65,16% 7823! 33801 4191 116221 67.31% 15717:-2160 13578 -1956 _____________________________________________ 15404! 69671 752| 231231 66.62%! 28443! -5320 134801 54151 6201 195151 fiS.OSy.l 244541 -4939 Offlca of OtMQrvgattonLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES STUDY COMMITTEE Dr. Delbra Caradine P. O. Box 164229 Little Rock, AR 72216 B. J. McCoy 2417 S. Marshall Little Rock, AR 72206 Rohn Muse 822 Lewis Little Rock, AR 72204-2016 Lou Ethel Nauden 4400 w. 22nd * Little Rock, AR 72204 Diane Vibhakar 3917 S. Lookout Little Rock, AR 72205 Kris Baber 2519 N. Fillmore Little Rock, AR 72207 Andy Carpenter 6 Van Lee Little Rock, AR 72205 Terry Paulson 2613 Wentwood Valley Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 Patricia Davenport 502 Green Mtn. Circle, #22 Little Rock, AR 72211 Latricia Henderson 1724 Marlyn Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Joa Humphrey 5022 W. 56th St. Little Rock, AR 72209 Arthur Locke 3515 LeHigh Drive Little Rock, AR 72204 Tom Brock 8207 Crystal Valley Cv. Little Rock, AR 72210 Gregg Stutts * 13005 Lemoncrest Lane Little Rock, AR 72209 John Walker 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Joy Springer 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Betty Mitchell CTA Office Frank Martin CTA Office * Skip Marshall, Monitor ODM - 201 E. Markham Brady Gadberry * LRSD Administration Heritage West Bldg-Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 * indicates newly nominated members of the committee(7. Z - Bloc 0111 0112 0121 0122 0123 0124 0125 0126 0127 0210 0220 0232 0240 0301 0412 0413 0420 0431 0432 0433 0434 0435 0436 0437 0438 0439 0440 0441 0442 0443 0444 0445 0446 0448 0449 0450 0451 0452 0453 0454 0455 0456 0457 8/27/96 K-3 17 26 7 26 21 60 15 25 9 48 55 3 17 4 6 2 15 24 28 19 10 7 16 31 35 48 16 7 22 17 8 13 8 54 38 31 7 22 18 12 32 35 20 G3 -6 6 14 5 13 17 30 10 19 4 29 34 1 14 2 3 2 8 11 10 16 8 5 20 19 14 23 9 7 12 16 7 4 2 36 20 24 7 18 10 10 14 24 17 G7-9 7 16 5 15 23 25 12 15 6 43 50 8 14 4 1 0 9 19 11 12 3 9 23 18 17 29 21 11 14 13 8 7 7 25 20 30 10 14 8 17 26 18 22 GlO-12 6 9 7 13 15 19 11 26 7 23 49 0 6 4 2 0 13 15 9 13 7 12 23 12 12 25 16 9 16 9 6 4 6 29 17 14 6 12 9 8 17 23 26 Litlie Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 36 65 24 67 76 134 48 85 26 143 188 12 51 14 12 4 45 69 58 60 28 33 82 80 78 125 62 34 64 55 29 28 23 144 95 99 30 66 45 47 89 100 85 Black 35 63 24 67 76 134 48 85 26 138 173 11 51 14 11 3 22 66 52 59 27 17 82 79 73 124 52 34 61 53 29 28 23 142 91 98 29 66 44 47 68 70 85 Page 1 of 8 6' hit Non-Black 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 1 0 0 1 1 23 3 6 1 1 16 0 1 5 1 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 1 0 21 30 0 B Pin 1 3 1 3 3 5 2 3 1 6 7 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 5 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 6 4 4 1 3 2 2 3 3 3 W Pins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0Z - Bloc 0458 0459 0460 0461 0462 0463 0464 0471 0472 0473 0474 0475 0476 0477 0478 0479 0480 0481 0482 0483 0484 0485 0511 0512 0513 0521 0522 0523 0524 0525 0526 0527 0528 0530 0531 0532 0533 0534 0535 0586 0537 0538 0539 8/27/96 K-3 16 35 27 25 37 22 21 7 18 28 9 29 26 21 20 29 15 65 46 55 10 24 4 2 34 26 40 39 41 0 __n 241 3 0 41 25 15 23 20 43 41 20 4 G3 -6 7 10 20 12 26 13 18 7 12 20 4 22 7 13 15 15 10 27 12 34 10 10 7 5 36 12 26 23 31 0 _____7 11 2 0 26 20 13 12 19 29 24 7 4 G7-9 12 12 16 21 21 13 20 7 18 15 5 37 16 9 16 9 11 23 11 30 10 18 4 6 32 24 ___ ___ ___ 1 7 15 1 0 24 24 13 7 12 19 26 13 4 GlO-12 13 20 10 13 11 10 15 12 16 27 10 17 13 5 7 16 14 21 19 14 6 15 3 5 33 ____ ____n 26 34 0 9 8 2 1 16 23 12 8 18 24 32 16 6 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 48 77 73 71 95 58 74 33 64 90 28 105 62 48 58 69 50 136 88 133 36 67 18 18 135 90 135 121 132 1 ___ 58 ____8 1 107 92 53 50 69 115 123 56 18 Black 48 74 69 62 91 57 73 33 64 88 28 100 61 48 57 69 50 131 84 132 36 67 13 16 129 70 121 120 126 1 ___ 56 8 1 91 85 51 41 61 105 116 55 18 Page 2 of 8 Non-Black 0 3 4 9 4 1 1 0 0 2 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 5 2 6 20 14 1 6 0 1 0 0 16 7 9 8 10 7 1 0 B Pin 2 3 3 2 4 2 3 1 3 4 1 4 2 2 2 3 2 5 3 5 1 3 1 1 5 3 5 5 5 0 ____2 2 0 0 4 ____3 ____2 ____2 2 4 5 ____2 1 WPins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 _____0 _____0 0 _____1 _____0 _____0 _____0 _____0 ____0 ____0 ____0 0Z - Bloc 0540 0552 0553 0554 0556 0561 0562 0563 0571 0572 0573 0574 0575 0581 0582 0583 0584 0585 0586 0587 0591 0592 0610 0620 0630 0640 0641 0650 0651 0660 0662 0670 0710 0811 0821 0910 0920 1010 1020 1110 nil 1120 1121 8/27/96 K-3 5 40 49 31 24 31 29 32 34 19 24 34 7 28 37 32 40 42 15 18 34 5 14 25 4 23 14 9 37 55 13 59 28 18 44 37 29 8 20 24 54 6 6 G3 -6 1 20 45 17 11 26 18 19 25 17 15 15 8 18 22 15 34 25 16 13 14 1 18 16 7 3 8 3 33 40 12 49 12 18 22 33 17 4 15 14 11 3 2 G7-9 5 27 37 14 24 26 30 18 29 21 21 18 10 16 20 21 35 31 9 16 20 2 20 20 6 6 7 2 28 54 18 36 27 16 25 42 27 5 ___17 7 23 5 6 GlO-12 4 25 27 21 16 33 20 25 31 14 15 16 12 17 25 24 36 27 8 17 18 1 13 21 6 4 0 10 26 41 13 28 13 15 24 34 25 4 ____ n ____ 6 2 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 15 112 158 83 75 116 97 94 119 71 75 83 37 79 104 92 145 125 48 64 86 9 65 82 23 36 29 24 124 190 56 172 80 67 115 146 98 21 68 62 113 20 16 Black 8 105 152 80 74 116 96 93 113 71 74 83 36 76 103 92 141 102 48 62 81 5 0 10 1 3 0 13 3 148 51 90 16 0 2 12 15 10 20 0 41 4 1 Page 3 of 8 Non-Black 7 7 6 3 1 0 1 1 6 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 4 23 0 2 5 4 65 72 22 33 29 11 121 42 5 82 64 67 113 134 83 11 48 62 72 16 15 B Pin 0 4 6 3 3 5 4 4 5 3 3 3 1 3 4 4 6 4 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 2 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ____2 0 0 W Pins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 1 0 5 2 0 3 3 3 5 5 3 0 2 2 3 1 1Z - Bloc 1210 1220 1230 1231 1240 1310 1311 1312 1331 1332 1405 1410 1420 1421 1430 1440 1510 1511 1512 1515 1520 1530 1531 1532 1541 1550 1610 1620 1630 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 8/27/96 K-3 16 8 28 18 122 37 20 11 23 4 13 74 18 16 105 21 27 68 20 50 19 10 17 17 15 37 12 9 __ 8 __ 9 92 40 39 44 29 27 17 44 16 23 50 G3 -6 9 4 26 14 92 17 11 2 17 5 12 43 23 20 59 13 13 46 15 41 5 2 3 12 12 20 10 3 22 6 26 2 50 21 23 33 18 29 14 ____30j ____B ____11 29 G7-9 13 7 33 22 96 11 18 2 15 2 8 47 17 23 65 8 22 36 10 40 6 6 6 11 12 17 7 6 22 9 30 9 ___ ___ ___ 44 31 31 20 26 10 14 20 GlO-12 22 7 31 22 61 14 18 7 18 7 18 74 26 25 48 18 15 25 11 40 10 2 8 8 10 23 5 6 17 6 38 5 60 37 20 43 ___ 18 22 29 14 21 28 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 60 26 118 76 371 79 67 22 73 18 51 238 84 84 277 60 77 175 56 171 40 20 34 48 49 97 34 24 91 29 122 25 248 127 100 164 121 105 73 129 53 69 127 Black 8 0 4 1 10 41 63 0 10 0 9 32 10 10 109 7 14 49 14 11 8 12 6 28 13 18 3 5 ___ 7 110 15 239 123 80 160 108 71 71 111 50 46 118 Page 4 of 8 Non-Black 52 26 114 75 361 38 4 22 63 18 42 206 74 74 168 53 63 126 42 160 32 8 28 20 36 79 31 19 68 22 12 10 9 4 20 4 13 34 2 18 3 23 9 B Pin 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 ____0 1 ____0 4 1 10 5 3 6 4 3 3 4 ____2 2 5 WPins 2 1 5 3 14 2 0 1 3 1 2 8 3 3 7 2 3 5 2 6 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 _____0 _____1 _____0 1 0Z - Bloc 1728 1810 1811 1812 1813 1821 1822 1823 1824 1910 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 2010 2015 2020 2110 2120 3201 3250 3251 3253 3301 3312 3316 3330 3401 3405 3406 3410 3415 3420 3425 3430 3435 3440 3464 3601 3605 3615 3620 8/27/96 K-3 31 33 12 36 33 47 48 85 39 11 20 28 30 47 7 22 32 17 72 48 1 32 15 14 34 30 23 21 49 43 52 13 19 14 18 6 14 11 36 24 8 14 15 G3 -6 14 19 10 30 24 25 32 50 21 9 15 19 14 32 6 16 36 15 51 35 2 29 13 13 40 22 11 19 30 26 35 12 18 8 7 7 12 10 20 21 12 14 10 G7-9 16 12 15 19 38 26 30 66 31 10 17 18 15 38 5 12 32 15 49 36 0 24 11 9 22 13 10 18 30 28 33 8 17 2 12 4 12 8 15 23 10 10 10 GlO-12 28 15 16 44 50 30 35 59 22 14 20 19 16 40 9 17 27 16 47 23 2 24 17 14 34 16 16 16 18 34 26 6 14 5 7 3 12 5 7 11 7 9 4 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 89 79 53 129 145 128 145 260 113 44 72 84 75 157 27 67 127 63 219 142 5 109 56 50 130 81 60 74 127 131 146 39 68 29 44 20 50 34 78 79 37 47 39 Black 82 68 53 112 121 109 126 198 76 41 48 36 31 123 12 26 56 29 109 86 5 63 31 44 37 19 10 13 93 110 135 20 64 22 38 7 26 25 33 59 24 38 21 Page 5 of 8 Non-Black 11 0 17 24 19 19 62 37 3 24 48 44 34 15 41 71 34 110 56 0 46 25 6 93 62 50 61 34 21 11 19 4 7 6 13 24 9 45 20 13 9 18 B Pin 3 3 2 4 5 4 5 8 3 2 2 1 1 5 0 1 2 1 4 3 0 3 1 2 1 1 0 1 4 4 5 1 3 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 W Pins 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 4 2 0 2 1 0 4 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 1Z - Bloc 3625 3630 3635 3640 3645 3646 3647 3648 3649 3650 3651 3652 3654 3655 4001 4010 4015 4020 4025 4046 4048 4049 4052 4053 4401 4405 4410 4415 4420 4429 4430 5401 5402 5405 5406 5407 5408 5415 5452 5455 5460 5462 5465 8/27/96 K-3 15 0 39 12 25 13 26 34 18 46 12 7 40 8 13 30 5 15 7 6 11 14 6 0 37 22 14 12 __n 24 17 4 __14 ___9 6 9 __ 6 ___ ___4 15 3 13 G3 -6 13 1 37 4 19 7 9 15 12 20 11 7 23 9 4 21 6 7 14 7 15 19 9 2 29 10 9 5 13 13 7 2 13 8 6 5 19 5 11 1 13 2 5 G7-9 10 0 30 8 16 17 8 15 10 11 9 7 24 11 4 32 7 6 13 6 16 22 6 1 23 15 ___16 ____7 14 20 10 3 ___ ____8 8 10 ___ 6 2 1 21 0 7 GlO-12 18 0 24 7 9 14 12 7 8 15 5 3 12 6 7 57 4 4 22 8 17 11 7 2 26 19 8 6 11 17 7 1 3 9 2 8 18 3 6 2 10 2 8 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 56 1 130 31 69 51 55 71 48 92 37 24 99 34 28 140 22 32 56 27 59 66 28 5 115 66 47 30 69 74 41 10 40 34 22 32 86 20 28 8 ____ 7 33 Black 28 1 113 30 61 47 47 57 32 85 33 18 81 19 3 118 12 3 53 2 19 44 4 0 106 54 32 13 59 61 28 0 2 14 2 18 73 5 0 2 4 0 9 Page 6 of 8 Non-Black 0 17 1 8 4 8 14 16 4 6 18 15 25 22 10 29 3 25 40 22 24 5 9 12 15 17 10 13 13 10 38 20 20 14 13 15 28 6 55 7 24 BPin 1 0 5 1 2 2 1. 1 3 1 1 3 1 0 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Pins i 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 _____1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1Z - Bloc 5467 5470 5475 5476 5477 5478 5492 6110 6115 6120 6122 6125 6171 6188 7201 7210 7220 7230 7235 7240 7245 7250 7276 7277 7279 7280 7281 7301 7305 7310 7315 7325 7330 7375 7377 7378 7380 7381 7382 7383 7384 7385 7387 8/27/96 K-3 2 4 30 29 19 23 19 58 30 1 12 9 13 26 59 15 11 18 37 17 54 34 14 22 17 7 15 40 5 7 38 19 5 15 45 6 40 25 67 4 28 22 98 G3 -6 0 0 22 18 18 8 10 28 16 0 6 6 10 23 45 13 5 23 19 10 40 22 19 17 6 9 13 30 6 6 26 8 5 10 25 7 20 15 27 4 20 8 48 G7-9 2 1 18 18 23 9 9 13 10 0 19 4 12 14 34 10 7 17 22 9 18 22 22 20 16 6 14 26 18 5 30 9 9 17 42 6 20 8 6 8 29 ___10 37 GlO-12 0 2 12 28 23 5 7 24 24 0 11 5 6 16 39 9 3 18 18 19 12 16 10 12 15 8 7 35 8 8 22 10 3 5 23 7 39 15 7 8 29 18 29 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23, 1996 Total 4 7 82 93 83 45 45 123 80 1 48 24 41 79 177 47 26 76 96 55 124 94 65 71 54 30 49 131 37 26 116 46 22 47 135 _______ 119 _______ 107 24 106 58 212 Black 0 3 11 31 13 4 10 12 23 0 8 3 5 17 146 36 15 57 83 45 106 79 47 35 46 19 33 115 22 24 93 46 16 36 114 ________ 108 51 102 22 86 54 199 Page 7 of 8 Non-Black 4 4 71 62 70 41 35 111 57 1 40 21 36 62 31 11 11 19 13 10 18 15 18 36 8 11 16 16 15 2 23 0 6 11 21 4 11 12 5 2 20 4 13 B Pin 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 2 3 2 4 3 2 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 4 2 1 1 ________ 1 ____4 2 4 1 3 2 8 W Pins 0 0 3 2 3 2 1 4 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1Z - Bloc 7388 7390 7401 7405 7410 7415 7420 7425 7467 7468 7469 7470 7471 7474 7475 7476 7479 7480 7490 7495 Totals K-3 14 17 64 15 28 29 7 12 5 25 11 9 11 19 27 18 1 5 3 10 7718 G3 -6 9 25 24 11 25 26 13 16 9 13 10 7 4 22 21 4 0 9 4 9 5086 G7-9 14 21 28 17 26 24 17 23 13 18 2 16 12 11 18 17 1 9 4 11 5384 GlO-12 13 19 27 16 27 25 16 18 7 18 10 14 15 17 27 20 0 6 0 14 5188 Little Rock School District Zone Block Count August 23.1996 Total 50 82 143 59 106 104 53 69 34 74 33 46 42 69 93 59 2 29 11 44 23376 Black 48 77 80 52 88 82 46 53 32 50 31 36 38 55 80 53 1 20 4 34 16331 69.86% Non-Black 2 5 63 7 18 22 7 16 2 24 2 10 4 14 13 6 1 9 7 10 7045 30.14% B Pin 2 3 3 2 4 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 653 WPins 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 282 8/27/96 Page 8 of 8Arkansas Democrat T3'(0azcllc  FRIDAY. MAY 10, 1996 LR panel on closing schools is reborn \u0026lt; BY CHRIS REINOLDS Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer 'AyLittle Rock School District committee created to make recommendations about renovating and possibly closing schools to cut costs is back in business with new faces. -The Little Rock School Board voted, unanimously at its agenda-setting meeting Thursday to recreate the Facilities Study Committee, dis- Ijanded in February. 'The panel will consist of two res- idents from each school board zone\ntwO representatives of the Joshua intervenors, who represent the black children in the district\nand twb people from the Knight intervenors, representing the teachers. The old panels composition had drawn complaints from board member Sue Strickland, who helped disband tlie committee. She will be the new committee's chairman. Strickland said the old committee included district administrators but not residents who would actually be affected by school closings. She also said that she disagreed with what she believed was the committee's sole intent  closing Mabelvale Junior High School in Southwest Little Rock. School district officials calls for closing some schools with low enrollments have continued during the conuiiittee's absence. The old committee began meeting in November after a consulting firm from San .Antonio issued a 13- volume study of district demographics and tire condition of school buildings. The study said the schools need S77 million in repairs, renovations and modernization. The consultants recommended closing as many as 11 schools because of poor physical condition and declining student population. The distncfs 50 school buildings have as many as 5,000 vacant seats. Bob Morgan, a member of the district's financial advisory committee. has said the districts student-to- employee ratio is below average when compared with districts of similar size. Maintaining schools not filled to capacity contributes to the low ratio and extra costs, Morgan said. The board also voted Thursday to allow, but not require, individual schools to determine the dress code for students, including the use of uniforms. Board member Judy Magness said Watson and Forest Park ele- i inentaries plan to use unifoi^ next I school year. Those schools join sev- | eral other elementary schools in the district that have a voluntary or mandatory' uniform policy./ 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 7300 100LRSD plant SERyiCES TEL:501-570-4027 Nov 08,95 12:05 No.003 P.02 5?-* I I Little Rock School District I November 8, 1995 I Ms. Ann Brown 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 I I Dear Ms. Brown: I I The Superintendent and the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District has requested that I extend an invitation to you or your representative to participate in an Implementation Pleuining Committee that is being drawn together to analyze the recommendations of the 1995 Facility Study and to put together implementation plans for those recommendations that are approved by the Board of Education. I I I I Our first meeting will be held at 9:00 the office of Student Assignments. a.m., November 9, 1995, in _ I apologize for the short notice for that meeting and if you are unable to attend because of this short notice, copies of agendas and minutes and any other documents generated as a result of that meeting will ba forwarded to you. I i I Should you have any questions concerning this invitation, please feel free to contact me at 570-4020. Sincerely yours. ^ugl^s C. Eaton DIRECTOR :rector FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCE/apl/invxte I I ) iAGENDA IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE 9 NOV. 1995 1. Welcome \u0026amp; Introductions 2. Committee Membership Discussion received 3. Scope \u0026amp; Purpose of Committee NOV 9 199S Ql 4. Facility Study Overview (Optional) Discussion 5. Implementation Plan Outline, Responsibilities 6. Implementation Plan Considerations 1. Ne?d MeetingRECOMMENDATIONS : To the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District Recommendation No 1 Establish Preventative Maintenance Capital Fund  Policy Protected Escrow  Annual Incremental Funding 9 9 9 Separate from Maintenance Budget Maintenance Operating Budget Surpluses to Fund Planned Capital Replace/Repair Disbursements Board Oversight Recommendation No 2 Establish Capital Program 9 9 9 9 Five Year Building Program Preferable Strategic Plan for Capital Program Design, Estimates and Planning Decisions Sale of Bonds Supported by Millage Increase Include Seed for Preventative Maintenance Fund Complete a Representative Program Recommendation No 3 Establish School Database  Zone Block System for LRSD School Boundaries 9 On Site Survey to Establish Accurate Census  Consider Attendance/Mapping/ Software System  Include Magnet Information  Include Record of Private School Attendees  Maintain System for Best Results (Forecasting)RECOMMENDATIONS : To the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District Recommendation No 4 Achieve Unitary Status e 9 Continuing Quality of Education Complete Capital Program Effective Maintenance Plan and Budget Reduce Burden of Bussing Eliminate Funding of Non Productive Programs Taxpayer Dollars for Students, not Lawyers Provide Flexible Educational Opportunities for Ali Recommendation No 5 Consolidation and Re-use 9 9 9 Establish New Attendance Zones Closure of Seven Elementary Schools Closure of One Jr. High School One to Four Elementaries out of Service Requires Completed Alterations, Additions and New Construction Operational Savings Pays for New Construction Recommendation No 6 Option C Preference  Enhanced School Experience for Children  Favorable Opportunity for Parent Participation  Development of Community Identities  Diminished Burden of Bussing  Comparable Cost to the District  Does Not Affect Special Education Opportunities  More Student Value for the DollarRECOMMENDATIONS : To the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District Recommendation No 7 Reviev\\/ of Options  Representative Review Team for Options  Evaluation of Strengths and Weaknesses  Include the Court  Reach a Conclusion for Best Interest of Children Recommendation No 8 Develop Critical Initiatives  Form Broad Based Dedicated Citizen Task Force  Support of Educational Programs \u0026amp; Achievements Support of Capita! Programs and Bond Offering Support of Adult Educational Programs via LRSD Support of Preventative Maintenance Recommendation No 9 Develop Leadership Core  Board Initiative  Community Representation Professional Men and Women Leaders from Area  Include Industry and Commerce Leadership  Commuter Assignments  Encourage Board Service (subject to election)RECOMMENDATIONS : To the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District Summary: Recommendation No 1 Establish Preventative Maintenance Capital Fund Recommendation No 2 Establish Capital Program Recommendation No 3 Establish School Database Recommendation No 4 Achieve Unitary Status Recommendation No 5 Consolidation and Re-use Recommendation No 6 Option C Preference Recommendation No 7 Review of Options Recommendation No 8 Develop Critical Initiatives Recommendation No 9 Develop Leadership CoreBia an OPTION C JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Closed School Primary Affect Cost Secondary Affect Cost Mablevale Cloverdale Southwest Pulaski Heights Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson OPTION M JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Mablevale Cloverdale Southwest Forest Heights Henderson Dunbar SouthwestEBfiH OPTION C ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Closed Schools Primary Affect Cost Secondary Affect Cost 1. Fair Park Brady $0 Franklin $1,300,596 Forest Park $2,086,500 2. Garland RightseU $1,996,085 RockefeUer $1,731,795 New School $4,190,120 3. Ish N/A 4. Stephens New School $4,190,120 5. Jefferson Badgett $938,925 RightseU $1,996,085 ML King $0 Brady $0 Mcdermott Bale $271,245 Cloverdale $549,445 Dodd $681,590 Romine $1,432,730 Western HiUs $1,571,830 6. Mitchell RightseU $1,996,085 RockefeUer $1,731,795 7. Wakefield Geyer Springs $2,566,395 8. Woodruff Forest Park $2,086,500 SUBTOTAL: $16,896,916 $3,092,193Closed Schools 1. Fair Park 2. Garland 3.1sh 4. Stephens OPTION M ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Primary Affect Cost Secondary Affect Cost__ New School $3,778,170 New School $3,625,160 N/A Terry $1,008,475 McDermott $375,570 Bale $159,968 Cloverdale $111,280 Otter Creek $452,075 Watson $111,280 5. Jefferson New School $3,778170 Western Hills $326,885 Rockefeller $0 Rightsell $389,480 Washington $0 ML King $0 6. Mitchell New School $3,625,160 7. Wakefield Baseline $1,189,305 Geyer Springs $1,057,160 8. Woodruff Forest Park $236,470 SUBTOTAL: $11,659,790 $1,161,488 SB anBsan IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CONSIDERATIONS 1. Cost (Renovation, New construction. Relocation, Equipment, Supphes, Organization) 2. Funding Considerations (Operational Budget, Multiple yr. Funding, MiUages, Bond Issues, Program impact) 3. Personnel (Reductions, Reassignments, New personnel. Organizational Changes) 4. Student Assignment Changes (Policies , Start dates, Academic Program Changes) 5. Desegregation Plan Changes (Racial balance definition. Student Assignment pohcy Changes, Multiple Areas) 6. Grade Structure Change (Middle school concept) I. Support Function Changes (Transportation, Procurement, Facihty Services) BganPURPOSE AND SCOPE FACILITY STUDY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE This document outlines the purpose and scope of the Little Rock School District Implementation Committee which is being staffed to analyze and make recommendations on the Long Range Facility Study completed in 1995 by 3D International Corporation. The Committee will consist of persons from the Little Rock School District staff and local community who will be charged by the Superintendent to make recommendations to him and the Little Rock School District Board of Education on the various aspects of the Facility Study. Their charge may also be extended to put together implementation plans and time lines once recommendations have been approved by the Board. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Committee is to devise an implementation plan and schedule based upon approved recommendations by the Little Rock School District Board of Education. The Committee will work within the frame work of the study analyzing the study recommendations for possible adaptations by the Little Rock School District. Those recommendations will comprise the final reports submitted to the Superintendent and Board of Education on which aspects of the Long Range Facility Study should be implemented by the School District along with recommendations as to an implementation schedule, time line and staffing of other areas of consideration. The Committee derives its authority from the Superintendent and is to work within the confines of the purposes and scope of the Facility Study as outlined in the contractual agreement between the Little Rock School District and 3D International Corporation. SCOPE\nThe scope of this Committee is to put together recommendations for the Superintendent and Little Rock School District Board of Education based on the nine (9) recommendations as made in the Long Range Facility Study. The Committee has the authority to consider and recommend or not recommend any and all aspects of the Facility Study for implementation. The scope of this Committee will be centered around the various aspects that run parallel to the basic recommendations in the Study by drawing them together as points of consideration and present recommendations to the Superintendent and Board. The Committee has the authority to deal directly with other staff members in making requests of them for information and cooperation should sub committees be formed under this general committee. It is intended that those recommendations whether they specifically impact the financial programming of the District would be made in such a way and at such a time that implementation can possibly BBaO'Page Two Bsan Continued occur during the next budget cycle. Recommendations dealing with closures and expansions, both cost saving and cost expanding, items in the study will be included in the recommendations. The Committee will work closely with the office of Program Review and Evaluations to ensure that its time lines accurately in project and budget documents. are reflected DCE/apl/lrfsBESaO COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES: LONG RANGE STUDY IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE The Implementation Committee that is being drawn together to analyze and make recommendations on the Long Range Facility Study will consist of the following individuals by job title and general subject area. 1. Associate Superintendent, Office of Desegregation and Student Assignment\nwill oversee the aspects of student assignment policies and compliance with the Desegregation Plan. 2. Director of Facilities Services: will oversee cost analysis and facility related matters dealing with expansions and closing of facilities. 3. Director of Communications: to oversee the public affairs efforts and public notifications dealing with meetings and the general public. 4. Special Assistant to the Superintendent: responsible for coordinating meetings in conjunction with the Director of Communications. 5. Manager Resources and School Support: to oversee financial planning and provide financial and fiscal guidance with regard to recommendations. 6. Assist ant Superintendent: to provide information regarding academic implementation and program changes with regard to the recommendations. 7. Human Resources Representative: to provide information regarding general knowledge of the District history and human relation aspects of the recommendations. 8. Board Members: to provide input and guidance from the Little Rock School District Board of Education. 9. Strategic Planning Committee Members: to provide input, analysis and guidance with regard to the tie in of the Long Range Facility Study to the Strategic Planning Process. 10. Representatives of the Intervenors, Knight). Desegregation parties (Joshua 11. Representatives from the office of Desegregation Monitoring. DCE/apl/crlrfsBsao FACILITY STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1. Facility Study Review 2. Superintendents Guidance. 3. Implementation Committee Assignments, Purpose and Scope 4. Implementation Planning - Plan of Action - Analysis of Facility Study - Recommendations, Submittal - Approvals - Implementation Plan, Schedule, Time lines - Oversight Responsibility'2 '* . .. -hzt^-\nSchoolV- BADGETT S 2 124 BALE 1 221 II w MO W' ItalilaS ! 2 5 1 i 3 BASELINE 220 1 17 ! o fiH ii\" 26^ 3 BOOKER 10 15 19 ' 12 14 20 BRADY 11 i 199 CARVER 15 8 b'i I 3 5 CHICOT 5 CLOVR EL DODD FAIR PRK 2 FORST PK 1 FRANKLIN FULBRIGH  GARLAND GEYER SP . GIBBS 2 JEFFRSN M L KING MABEL EL . MCDERMOT MEADCLIF MITCHELL\nOTTER CR PUL HT E 2 KIGHTSEL ROCKFELR 13 ROMINE TERRY WAKEFIEL WASHNGTN 5 WATSON WEST HIL WILLIAMS WILSON WOODRUFF TOTAL 15 18 I 9 4 . 302\n13 3 18 j 1 2 i!8 30 ! 318 7 3 1 10 4 11 3 3 5 8 3 6 4 5 8 2 1 7 1 2 9 6 1 I 2 6 5 7 2 12 2 15 J I 2 6 2 2 11 2 14 7 10 10 1 i 3 ziz: 2 1 i 2 2 1 2 i 13 11 4 2 8 6 2 8 3 4 4 7 2 I 2 J------- 8 I 11 ! 2 5 2 I I 1 3 23 { 20 3 2 2 1 1 8 2 34 ' i 8 2 16 6 4 14 1 I 4 2 8 1  f 1 tS *\"1...14 12 12 38 I 11 8 6 j 3 1 1 LIHLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE SUMMARY OCTOBER 2. 1995 Bi ip\ni 180 1 6 2 1 3 5 1 2 1 5 1 1 28 7 4 2 6 9 8 ffi o 1 5 1 9 4 1 165 4 9 1 2 4 6 3 9 11 } 8 3 9 11 5 286 11 7 5 1 1 7 6 5 2 6 2 3 2 15 5 52 2 2 4 249 8 I 4 1 8 1 9 0 6 I 2 - r....... 7 1 6 1 5 1 2 2 10 30 15 6 1 6 0 4 2 10 1 4 ...i....... 3 6 ! 14 10 17 6 I 160 I 413 I 357 I 380 j 557 | 506 1 306 | 320 | 412 [ 464 ifi LsiOllaiij o U Isii 2 5 2 1 3 5 11 1 12 17 i 19 2 5 2 6 4 385 3 1 9 6 10 21 2 3 1 5 15 18 16 S 12 13 6 605 4 2 2 1 3 2 8 24 164 3 2 7 7 1 2 IS 6 2 1 4 8 5 4 1 6 1 2 6 303 3 8 7 1 4 203 9 2 3 9 4 3 4 9 9 4 3 2 310 HJ 10 19 8 41 1 1 3 17 2 6 1 5 352 6 1 4 9 25 2 3 16 1 5 3 6 551 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 18 2 1 1 B\n18 14 2 4 4 1 s 1 5 1 1 42 2 1 2 5 2 6 7 2 4 9 7 3 11 18 1 11 11 15 5 102 ? 210 59.05% 2 4 4 11 5 6 3 i 347 327 144 9 6 3 2 13 18 26 11 1 24 3 63.69% 67.28% ! 26 1(f Ti6~ 23 5 6 5 604 1 5 14 7 29 6 1 10 2 5 10 9 6 3 2 7 14 221 4 1 4 5 6 13 14 3 2 2 4 9 1 9 1 11 418 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 329 4 5 3 7 1 4 12 19 1 5 4 482 14 4 2 IS 1 8 6 10 2 318 2 S 4 4 3 5 4 11 11 2 14 6 519 4 2 5 2 6 4 6 7 10 12 2 2 3 173 2 11 ..b\" 2 2 3 2 8 1 4 4 9 323 105 186 1 2 1 7 1 2 9 1 4 9 5 2 1 4 2 5 8 1 13 2 1 11 3 27 2 5 3 8 3 1 4 5 5 5 45 2 35 3 22 2 2 2 1 2 1 15 3 8 8 IS 3 4 3 7 1 12 34 14 2 7 5 17 8 10 1 5 6 5 24 1 394 629 50.51% 22 19 2 4 2 3 5 4 3 3 1 3 3 8 3 4 3 7 4 452 453 294 270 46 67 18 5 5 1 4 8 15 62 1 3 354 6 9 4 5 140 6 25 4 2 39 2 139 2 774 7 6 2 1 6 10 3 9 161 2 1 4 15 2 3 6 1 317 1 2 3 2 4 3 \\20 2 15 4 1 5 2 285 2 1 8 2 2 4 190 26 8 10 24 19 394 2 5 1 13 6 3 1 7 6 2 1 6 2 12 5 188 4 5 3 8 13 23 2 19 3 3 6 4 392 16 18 2 6 614 2 4 1 8 2 2 2 4 1 1 340 14 5 2 495 14 11 3 6 16 13 3 2 17 2 2 295 5 2 7 9 618 2 2 17 4 6 2 1 5 1 12 16 349 12 4 3 528 5 4 1 2 9 3 2 2 2 4 17 66.81% 70.20% 61.22% 61.11% 2 8 2 2 435 431 518 255 310 307 501 531  i 460 2 487 400 257 339 11 8 406 219 406 65.75% 57.77% 74.32% 64.31% 65.48% 70.26% 41.62% 71.52% 65.30% 68.50% 67.32% 79.06% 59.11% 73.52% 41.87% 3 7 213 8 15 2 296 16 3 21 20 20 226 476 2 2 1 302 536 429 j 656 114  444 315 508 384 62.91% 73.13% 79.25% 44.97% 78.60% 67.62% 58.85% 254 ' 44.88% 162 I 14O7o\"T OFFICE OF STVOENT ASSIGNMENTCLOVR JR 494 DUNBAR 38 FORST HT 23 HENDERSN 21 MABEL JR 73 MANN M/S 90 PUL HT J 21 SOUTHWST 17 JR TOTAL 777 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE SUMMARY OCTOBER 2, 1995 62 3 4 23 1 6 1 15 609 81.12% 443 64 64 3 15 9 22 21 53 732 60.52% 45 36 50 57 21 23 737 483 50 20 72 7 59 759 63.64% 34 4 54 36 18 696 588 4 114 48 20 8 892 f 3 1 7 11 1 19 11 71 792 74.24% 333 66 15 25 508 7 3 17 491 67.82% 109 2 1 123 67 570 4 767 220 8 271 67 59 504 847 781 612 845 15623 72.98% 82.35% OFFICE OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENTLU ILfc HOCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE SUMMARY OCTOBER 2. 1995 OFFICE OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT 1 Q X BZEHBi Little Rock School District receivst^ (3 JAN 1 6 1996 Office of Desegregacon fviontojn,^ January 11, 1996 Ms. Melissa Guilden 201 E. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guilden: The Implementation Committee recently held their Enclosed please find a copy of those minutes. sixth meeting. Our next meeting has not been scheduled due to scheduling conflicts\nhowever, I hope to contact you this month to request your selection on which subcommittee that you would like to serve. Once our next meeting has been scheduled, you will be notified. Sincerely yours, V D^ DIR] I [TOR C. Eaton FACILITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DCE/apl/ipcmeet 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-20004 A 5 JAH J 6 ^9% MINUTES IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE JANUARY 3, 1996 The Facility Study Implementation Committee held their sixth meeting on January 3, 1996. At that meeting, a revised scope was presented to the Committee for consideration so as to realign the direction of the Committee. A recommended change was made by committee members in reference to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors as opposed to Board of Education\nhowever, the scope was not voted upon and the committee is still not clear on what the general scope of their authority is. A Draft Implementation Planning Sub-Committee list was also prepared which initially divided LRSD employees and some members who have volunteered for specific committees to assist in drafting the various phases of an implementation plan assessment of the Facility Study. and because of The sub-committees have still not been firmed up, this the specific charge. obligations requirements of those sub-committees has not been defined. and An agenda item of a plan time line was not discussed due to lack of time. A special report was made by Ms. Lowe, who is working on the subcommittee dealing with public affairs. They have began holding sub-committee meetings and have taken a first step of holding their own public meeting on January 10, 1996. We had a long, involved discussion regarding what the aspects are of our committee and how we are to develop an implementation plan. Of many items discussed. highlights centered around how the configuration of the middle schools would be impacted or would impact the Facility Study\nhow do we secure public reaction to the various aspects of the downsizing\nand how do we involve public acceptance? We have yet to develop any kind of a firm guideline or plan as to how we should approach the public. At the direction of the Superintendent, informal meetings have begun in various communities simply to inform Little Rock School District patrons and the general public on what the study encompasses and to assure them that a group of LRSD employees and the general public are looking at how the various options in the Facility Study could be implemented if necessary, but that no decisions have been made. It is becoming obvious that specific sub-committees will have to be formed out of the realm of the general committee by securing volunteers and that specific areas of implementation will have to be examined.Page Two Continued covers. At the present time, the only thing that we are comfortable going to the public with is the general parameters of the study and what it Detailed questions regarding whether or not the District is going to implement the Study, and how it will affect the children and the education system have yet to be determined. This leaves many unanswered questions at many of these public meetings. DCE/apl/minutes6! Arkansas Demi  locrat I SATURDAY, JANUARY 13, 1996------- \u0026lt;*\u0026lt; Ulto  Committee on LR school closings sets forum A Little Rock School District committee charged with developing a plan that could lead to some schools being closed will hold a community forum at 10 a.m today at the Adult Leisure Center, 6401W. 12th St The Facilities Committee, made up of district administrators and commimity members, has been studying the recommendations of a Texas consoling firm that evaluat- No decisions have been made by ii J.i 1 1- ujg committee although members have indicated they dont believe ed all district schools. The consultants recommended closii^ at least eight schools and redrawing attendance zones as a way to oSset a projected loss of more any schools should be closed in the 19^97 school year. than 3,000 students by the year 2005. f The facilities conunittee has been meeting with parents at each of the schools that the consultants named as candidates for closure.RECEIVED JUN  1996' FACILITIES COMMITTEE NOMINEES Zone 1 Mitchell Dr. Delbra Caradine B. J. McCoy of O' OOi! :i: i\"cni\ncrinc,^ Zone 2 Daugherty Rohn Muse Zone 3 Magness Diane Vibhakar 3917 S. Lookout Little Rock, AR 72207 661-8030 Kris Baber 2519 N Fllmore Little Rock, AR 72207 663-5443/682-2479 Zone 4 Riggs Andy Carpenter 6 Van Lee Little Rock, AR 72205 221-9632 Terry Paulson 2613 Wentwood Valley Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 225-8155/569-8868 Zone 5 Pondexter Patricia Davenport 502 Green Mtn. Circle, #22 Little Rock, AR 72211 221-0876/570-4100 Latricia Henderson 1724 Marlyn Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 227-9498/982-9436 Zone 6 Gee Joa Huphrey 5022 W. 56th Little Rock, AR 72209 565-4110 Arthur Locke 3515 LeHigh Drive Little Rock, AR 72204 225-9035/225-5534 Zone 7 Strickland Tom Brock 8207 Crystal Valley Cv. Little Rock, AR 72210 455-4754 Phil Wyrick 11001 Alexander Rd. Alexander, AR 72103 455-4073 JOSHUA INTERVENORS: John Walker 1723 Boadway Little Rock, AR 72206 374-3758 Joy Springer KNIGHT INTERVENORS: Betty Mitchell Frank MartinVAN N. LIGHT 15 Sunset Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 663-9287 aa: c/ - mar 7 4- 1996 March 5, 1996 of Oeje\nar\nn. Ms. Sue Strickland Member, Little Rock School Board 19 Pear Tree Lane Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Re: February' 22, 1996 School Board Meeting\nFacility Study Committee Dear Sue: Thank you for having lunch with me yesterday to discuss my concern regarding your failure to advise members of the Facility Study Committee of your intention to call for the suspension of the Committees work at the February 22, 1996 school board meeting. As I indicated at lunch, in my view, the community members who had volunteered so much of their time to this committees work deser'/ed prior notice of your intention out of courtesy and respect for their efforts. While you and I disagreed on whether the Committee should have been informed of your intentions prior to the meeting, I did appreciate your apology. I think your apology has the potential for healing some of the frustration felt by the community members of the Committee and plan to share it with the Committee by copy of this letter. There remains one open issue relating to the actions taken at the February 22, 1996 LRSD Board meeting with regard to the Committee having to do with a reason you expressed for wanting to suspend the Committees work. I reviewed the tape of the board meeting last week and believe you misstated the present status of the Committee when you stated: Excuse me. I am on that committee. The only thing that we are challenged to address is closing Mabelvale Junior High. As you know, the foregoing statement is simply not true. I advised you by phone on Monday, February 19 and by fax (copy enclosed) the next day that the committee leadership had been restructured and that the Committee was searching for a facilitator to assist the Committee in coming to an agreement regarding its scope, purpose, composition, subcommittee structure, decision timeline and decision framework. The information conveyed to you before the February 22nd Board Meeting clearly indicated that the Committee was no where near making a recommendation of any sort-much less a recommendation to close Mabelvale Junior High. Had you been at the February 14th Committee meeting (minutes enclosed) you would have witnessed the expression of dissatisfaction with the course of the Committee and appreciated the strong desire of theMs. Sue Strickland March 5, 1996 Page 2 community members of the Committee to set the Committee on an agreed upon course. Unfortunately, this information was not relayed to the Board and it was forced to make a decision without knowing all the facts. Of course, if I or a member of the Committee had been informed of your intention to seek suspension of the Committee at the February 22nd meeting the Board could have been informed of the current status of the Committee. The failure to portray accurately the status of the Committee is particularly puzzling in light of the concern you expressed at the February 22nd meeting about recruitment of students and families to the Little Rock School District. How can the Board expect to instill trust and involvement in the District when the efforts of people, like the volunteer members of the Committee, are summarily dismissed based on inaccurate information? Volunteers who take time away from other priorities to serve the public school system deserve more. The very least you owe the Committee members is to set the record straight regarding the work of the Facility Study Committee. The Board and the public should know that the committee members were determined to set the Committee on a correct course, had taken steps to do so and did not have the single issue agenda of closing Mabelvale Junior High. I would hope that you would make this information available to the Board. If you wont correct the record, then I will at the next available opportunity address the Board. I care very deeply about the future of the Little Rock School District and have been actively involved since my children began attending public schools. I also care about getting other parents involved in the District. I hope you will help insure that the efforts of those who do get involved will not be taken for granted or misinterpreted by accurately conveying the work of the Facility Study Committe to the Board. Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me. Sincerely, inht Van N. Light Co-Chair Facility Study Committee cc: Facility Study Committee MembersDELIVERED BY FAX 9 V DATE: February 20, 1996 TO. Facilities Study Committee Members OJSce ^4i-' 7 FROM: RE: Van Light, 663-9287 Co-chair, Facilities Study Committee Facilitator Selection/Critical Questions Input for Facilities Study Committee At the Facilities Committee meeting on Wednesday, February 14, 1996, the committee decided to restructure the committee leadership with a co-chair format, one chair from the community and one chair from the LRSD staff. I was elected as a co-chair representing the community and Doug Eaton will continue as the LRSD staff co-chair. In addition, pursuant to Committee action on February 14th, a facilitator is to be identified and selected to assist our committee in developing committee goals, scope, decision timeline and framework. Several other critical questions were compiled at this meeting. They are enclosed for your review. Please call me with additions or corrections. These questions will be given to the facilitator. Selection of Facilitator The Committee agreed to seek the assistance of a facilitator for a limited time and as a volunteer. Suggested work parameters are at most 2 committee workshops of up to four hours each. Please submit your suggestions by the end of the week. I contacted as many of you as I could by phone on Monday, February 19th in advance of this memo. Two suggestions have been made so far: Judith Foust and Max Snowden. Since we are asking candidates to volunteer his/her time, several suggestions are required. Thanks very much. If you do suggest someone, please provide a short profile. Once all suggestions have been made, then I will contact you again by letter/phone/fax with names and profiles. You will have the opportunity to rank preference and/or express concern about a candidate. Remember the facilitator will not make decisions but help us to formulate our own committee structure and framework for the committee members to make the decisions. Thank you for your time and support.DRAFT Facility Study Implementation Planning Minutes, February 14, 1996 Committee Members Present Doug Eaton, chair Nancy Acre Brady Gadberry Melissa Guildin Charles Johnson Van Light Nancy Lowe Leon Modeste Rohn Muse Fred Smith Diane Vibhakar Connie Whitfield Linda Young Members Not Present Sadie Mitchell Sue Strickland Sammy Mills Vic Anderson Russ Mayo Betty Mitchell Xavier Heard Margaret Gremillion Suellen Vann John Walker Donna Creer Robert Hightower Kathy Wells Skip Marshall Frank Martin Richard Roachell 1  ** ~ \" y,  MAR 7- 'i5?3 D Mr. Doug Eaton, chair, called the meeting to order at 5:00 pm. Mr. Eaton asked for a report from the Outreach Subcommittee. This report was defered to the next meeting because certain members necessary to make the full report were not present at the meeting. Nancy Lowe did state that she had presented the overview of the Facility Study to the Area School Advisory Committee on Monday, February 12, 1996 and circulated the \"Public Schools at the Crossroads\" document (attached) compiled by the Outreach Subcommittee. Rohn Muse, who is on a Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce committee, stated that the Chamber's Executive Committee had requested through him that the Outreach Subcommittee brief the Executive Committee. After discussion the Facility committee agreed that future requests for Facility Study briefings should be requested through the Communications Office under the direction of Suellen Vann. Since the Chamber briefing had already been scheduled for the next day, February 15, the committee agreed that only the \"Public Schools at the Crossroads\" document be circulated and that any questions or requests for more information concerning the Facility Study should be directed through the Communications Office.DRAFT Minutes, February 14, 1996 Page 2 Mr. Eaton announced that the Bi-Racial Committee had been given a Facility Study Briefing on February 6, 1996. Additional briefings are scheduled for Wilson Elementary on March 8, 1996\nFair Park Elementary on March 11, 1996\nand, Garland Elementary on March 25, 1996. Mr. Eaton circulated to members the Special Report\nFacility Study Implementation Planning Committee Memo and School Closing Timeline (attached) which had been presented to the LRSD Board of Directors on January 25, 1996. Van Light noted that Number 2 of the memo should read \"Option M\" instead of \"Option C.\" Further discussion occured concerning these documents. Van Light made a motion that written Facility Committee progress reports to the LRSD board should be reviewed, if time permitted, by all committee members prior to submission to the LRSD Board of Directors. The motion was discussed and passed. It was agreed on occasions when LRSD Boardmembers and/or the Superintendent requested information from Mr. Eaton as the Plant Services Director and required immediate response then the commmittee would be apprised after the fact. Linda Young requested that Rohn Muse's name be added on the committee membership list. Mr. Eaton agreed to do so. As Mr. Eaton was circulating a draft Revised Scope for this committee to discuss, the members discussed and agreed that the Agenda Item dealing with Committee Structure should be addressed first. Van Light then circulated a letter (attached) signed by Charles Johnson and herself requesting two agenda items for the February 14th meeting. The first item addressed committee leadership. The letter attached explains the committee situation. The community members recommended that a facilitator should be asked to run the meetings. After discussion and specifically Fred Smith noting that there was no budget to hire a facilitator, a compromise approach was reached. It was agreed that the committee should have co-chairs, one from the community who would run the meetings, and a LRSD staff member as the other co-chair. In addition, a facilitor would be asked to come on a voluntary basis for a limited time to help the committee develop an agreed uponDRAFT Minutes, February 14, 1996 Page 3 scope, purpose, committee structure, composition, and other organizational needs. The members agreed that a facilitator would be more likely to help if it was a short term commitment. Fred Smith nominated Van Light to be the community co-chair. It was seconded. She was elected to the position. The members then listed serveral critical questions (attached) that are to be given to the facilitator once identified. It was noted that a committee member, instead of the chairperson, should become the official secretary for future meetings. Mr. Eaton had been taking the minutes of all the meetings previously. The second agenda item requested by the community members in the above referenced letter concerned requesting 3D1 to make a formal presentation to the committee. This would allow all questions that committee members had to be anwered and understood fully. No specific action was recommended because it was deferred for the next meeting when the facilitator would be present. The revised scope statement and subcommittee composition agenda items were tabled until the next meeting when the facilitator will be present. Mr. Eaton did state that he had asked three LRSD staff to begin forming subcommittees in order to get issues surfaced that would assist the general committee in its thought process with regard to studying the options. Mr. Eaton passed out, as general information, a document entitled \"School Closing Information Paper\" (attached) to assist committee members in trying to understand the multiple steps necessary in deciding school closings. The meeting adjourned about 6:15 pm. The next meeting would be determined once a facilitator had been identified and an agreed upon date set. Minutes prepared by Van Light with assistance from Mr. Eatons Memorandum for Record, Implementation Planning Committee Meeting - 2/14/96, dated March 1, 1996 and Nancy Lowe's recording the list of critical questions.TO: TKR! q-[jc -r LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DIRECTORATE OF FACILITY SERVICES 3601 S. BRYANT LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 January 25, 1996 Vittle Rock School District Boar FROM : a Sat on, Director of Special Sucerintendent T ommr tie Rock School District Faci Ccmmi tee xS charged Wltl\" he various restru uring options as presenter The committee administration membership consists staff, Desegregaticr community individuals. d of Directors y Sezn-ices V o do 1 y stU\narty ers ccmmlttee has casi t this point has made the following pre iminary det ns an ions\ncommittee focus Fa will only be on -mendati rents. ty restr'ucturing to meet projected stu^ 7 T 2 . Tha ths specifi e Wi' lT 7 be Optz.cn C.as it ertains to J nior i--ab schools. 3 . a school closin reccmmen\n:s .b-e his budget year cue to the estimated time of F 4 . Tha a primary focus will be :ubli and rmation sessions to secure public t and sun 5 . That additional subcommittees will be ether aspects o school restructuring and they ecome to analyte identified. There are no set timelines to implement a school closing, but rather a backward planning process starting with the desired closing date and student assignment effective date and then prorating your time over the identified steps and procedures necessary. The following is a list of significant events and suggested dates\n1. Prior to January: - Completed all data collection and analysis - Comprise list of facilities to be considered - Conduct public information meetings 2. January: - Finalize recommended action to board(Business case) - Secure board decision on closure - Begin support planning - Tentative assignment notification to students Begin support) definitized planning(personnel, students, 3 . Febr-uary: - Request court date - Conduct pre-registration 4. March: - Complete support planning (support staff) - Complete student plans - Complete public hearings - Complete personnel plans - Court hearing 5. June: - Close school - Final notification to students on assignments 6. August: - Reassign students This is a very condensed list and does not include he multitude of specific staff considerations with regard to this type action. CLCB2HPTFebiuaiy 12, 1996 Delivered in Person by Charles Johnson and Van Liuhl Mr. Doug Eaton Director, Plant Services LRSD 3601 S Bryant Little Rock .AR 72201 RE. Aaenda Items for 2'14/96 Facility Study Implementation Planning Committee (FSIPC) Meeting Dear Doug Persuant to your most recent letter in which you offered to receive agenda item suggestions from committee members, we respectfully submit the following agenda items A) B) Committee Leadership Structure Request for Facility Study Presentation by 3D! Last Friday '9/96, five FSIPC members from the community, Charles Johnson. Van Light. Kathy Wells. Nancy Lowe. Rohn Muse, met for 1 1. hours to discuss the FSIPC and its fiiture direction. The group agreed to recommend the above agenda items We also want to recommend that Rohen S Rules of Order be followed in future meetings. A. Committee Leadership Structure Problem Statement. In its present leadership structure the committee has not been able to progress as it should due to members and committee leadership not agreeing on committee purpose and scope. Symptoms of Problem. These symptoms suggest that a change is needed. a) 2 V2 - 3 hour meetings conducted with little or.no progress made or action taken, b) Committee Chairperson forming subcommittees outside the committee structure. c) Poor attendance at last two meetings. d) Expression of frustration by all membersdeadersiiip on lack of committee progress. Discussion This group discussed several strategies to address this problem. In the discussion of all strategies it was aareed that a neutral person was needed to run the meetings. The strategies discussed were. 1. Co-chairs, one community member\none LRSD staff member. The community member tunning the meeting, , 2. One chairperson - a community member 3. One chairperson - an experienced facilitator. This group by consensus agreed to recommend Strategy ^3, to find an experienced facilitator as soon as possible who might donate his/her time.Rationale for Selection of Strategy #3 Due to the obvious public interest and sensitivity/volativity with issues concerning facility changes, it is imperative that the public perception and, indeed, the reality be that this committee be one in which a) the leadership of the committee is neutral, b) the committee membership representation is city-wide, c) the evaluation process is fair and logical and is agreed upon by the committee, and, d) decisions are based on a shared vision by the committee using the Strategic Plans beliefs, mission and objectives as a guide. Due to the various perspectives of the committee members and the complexitv of issues relating to facilitv changes, having an experienced facilitator would be a needed asset. t. B) Facilitator Recommendations. The group did brainstorm on possible facilitators. Of course, other names can and should be considered. Those mentioned were. Ken Hubbell Earl Moore Joyce Springer Williams Mary F Dillard Dr David Sink Judith Foust Cliarlev Crawford Request for Faciiit\u0026gt; Study Presentation by 3DI Problem Statement. The inability of the members to understand the reasons and iustificaiii recommendations that per to facility changes. Reasons for Inability to Understand. 1) Contradictory messages: :ueen sections of studc 2) Insufficient narrative to support and.'or explain recommendations. Discussion. The group agreed that it w before decisions impacting on for the s essential that the integrity and validity of the study had to be upheld 'acilities by the committee could be made. This group agreed it could not and did not want to move fonvard until that point was reached. Therefore, it is recommended that a one-on- one session with the consultant be arranged. Specific information requests from consultant can be determined at the Wednesday meeting. This group recognizes the seriousness of the agenda items recomm.ended in this letter. We are earnest in our desire to make informed decisions We are committed in being supportive of the LRSD and its staff as we work together to recommend changes concerning the Districts facilities We pledge our good faith efforts to make decisions based on the overall good of the District. We await your comments and would be glad to discuss further any issue With regards, Charles Johnson 565-5715   \\ Van N. Light 663-9287'\" y cc: Mr. Fred Smith FSIPC Members (at W'ednesdays meeting) FACILITIES COMMITTEE Little Rock School District Critical Questions 1. 2 3. 4. 5. What is the scope of the committee? Do we need to revisit establishing goals? How can committee set forth a planning framework for itself with goals and timelines and benchmarks? Determine committee composition and numbers. Determine best tune to meet. 6. Vanong levels of trust w ith school district within committee. 7. 8. 9. Wdiat are the specific subcommittees? Determine subcommittee composition and numbers. Wdiat are the subcommittees tasks? 10. 11. 12. 13. Are we satisfied wdth the facilities study as a piece to begin decision making\"? Do we need to have 3 DI make a presentation? Varying levels of understanding about facility study wtliin committee. How did decision to close identified schools within recommendations get done? 14. 15. How do we communicate internally within the committee and with and between subcommittees? How are we going to communicate committee decisions to the general public? 16. Others? SCHOOL CLOSING PROCEDURES INFORMATION DOCUMENT 1) INTRODUCTION: 2) RSCEJVED MAR 7 199$- Office cf Desegrajefien Monitoring School closings are generally examined using the same criteria established by planners for the location and construction of new schools. Such general areas as student populations, demographic trends, economic analysis are the same general areas of consideration to be used when the predetermined goal is consideration of closing a school. Because there are no defined guidelines for decision-makers, nor definitive brackets of cost and population against which an objective analysis can be made to lose a school, we WP can establish research data but not clearly define will fully support a closing, will be heavily subjective. WXiCil that Therefore, our final decision We must understand that School Districts must operate financially by maximizing costs on a per capita basis. Only through maximum economies of scale, by going to maximum class size and facility capability. while meeting students' individual needs for achievement can we hope to operate in an economically efficient manner. In examining a particular school as a candidate for closing. we must certainly examine the entire school system. or at least a cluster of schools which would be immediately impacted by the closing. Basic economic decisions considered in facilities planning include decisions to incrementally add to schools as student numbers go up, and the fact that we design and build for future use, and not just current needs. This leads us to consider projected student populations and current and expected costs as the two (2) main considerations in school closings. WHEN DO WE CONSIDER A SCHOOL FOR CLOSING: I've identified five (5) areas of consideration that would support a decision to examine whether or not a specific facility should be closed: A) Consideration should be given to closing a acility when the repair costs can not be amortized economically. Examples would be when emergency repair costs exceed the value of the school, such as damage due to f 1 fire, 1earthquake, etc., or when the deferred maintenance costs on any major component would exceed a certain value of the overall costs of the facility. This deferred maintenance must include replacement to include costs to upgrade to current standards of such major components of the school as the heating/ventilation system, structural repairs, roof, and grounds. B) We should consider closing the facility when the operational maintenance costs of the facility begins to exceed the norm of all other similar facilities or when it can be shown that the operational maintenance cos C) D) would far exceed the life cycle costing of a new f as compared to the remaining life of the original. This can be done through a life cycle cost analysis of a new facility of equitable size. One must consider here that a replacement facility of larger size can better capitalize on economies of scale and will tend to show a lower operational cost on a per capita basis than the ole facility. This is used as the strength of an argument for normal facility replacement simply due to age and operational costs. We should consider closing a facility when the student population decreases to the point that consolidation or redistribution of students must occur,- or when student projections show a steady decline over a determined period of time. The determined period of time should exceed the number of years of one (1) cycle of the school\nfor example, if the school encompasses K - Sth Grade, we should look, at least, at one (1) full cycle, or seven years, as the projected length and time to fully determine whether or not student projections are rising or falling. This should allow a slight increment in any given year due to a rise in birth rates but not skew the final data. We should consider closing a facility when general demographic trends of the entire area surface indicate a movement or shift in population, away from an existing 2E) 3) school. As population centers shift within the School District, it can be expected that as student populations decline in older areas. that per capita cost increase, that the closing of schools must be considered to meet the demands of the moving population. Many times, this will result in the Board of Education examining older schools. areas in more established areas, yet these established predominantly house older populations which do not tend to move with demographic trends within the city. We should consider closing a facility when the cost analysis of the school shows a disproportionate spending on a per capita basis for all other items not including operations and maintenance. We must closely examine this area. If operational costs on a per caoita basis are increasing due to decreasing student e rising operational costs of the program, be examined in support of school closing, must be cautioned that operational programs, newer technology. then nis However, osts for ust W6 new to achieve higher academic standards are not to be considered in this analysis per capita costs. RESEARCH AREAS: of The research area list is not all-inclusive, but meant to identify those key areas of consideration that will produce objective data. and those answers that will produce subjective answers. The following are areas which can be clearly defined objectively: A) A current operational cost analysis will proouce hard figures showing the operational costs on B) C) either a per school. or per capita basis. against the norm. We should consider both maintenance costs and academic costs. One time costs to bring the facility in line with current academic demands and current physical requirements such as bringing the building in line with current city codes. Examining student projections will clearly show a rise or fall in the anticipated enrollment over a 3given number of years. D) The costs associated with the transfer of students and the costs associated to adapt surrounding schools school. to incorporate students from the closed The following areas of examination will produce subjective answers: A) Trying to determine the impact on student's education if we move the student from a familiar environment to an unfamiliar environment. a B) Examining whether or not the closing of a school is not in contravention to t Laws. Fe C) Whether or not the closing of a facility is in line with the Little Rock School District's Desegregation Plan, or intent thereof. A subjective analysis will raise further questions such as: A) When do we physically close the school and move children? the B) How long will it take the children to go to, or be acclimated. in their new school? C) What would be the racial balance of the schools to which the children are redistributed? 4) WHEN DO YOU CLOSE A FACILITY: As Stated before, there are no hard, fast guidelines which would produce checklists that say. if you meet four (4) or five (5) criteria, the school will be closed\". It is more a subiective evaluation based on II It subjective objective data, and as such, will allow the decision-maker the ability to determine the nrioritv of the to determine priority listing considerations, and the specific criteria which will determine that the facility will be closed. In general, if a 45) combination of any of the following factors are present, a s A) B) ) D) then chool should be considered for closing: when the operational specified amount\ncosts exceeds the norm by a when the costs to upgrade the facility to current educational and code standards is cost-prohibitive against either new construction or the facility\nthe expected life of when you are considering realigning attendance zones just support student populations, or have to transport simply to maximize the facility. to children into an area or to spend funds to support educational attract students, all of which are intended to offsec L co rograms 11 c W student population and decreasing trends\nand, if schools are examined on a regional cluster. total combined facility space and exceeds the current projected needs and redistribution economic sense, or social considerations. consideration. PLANNING FACTORS: procedure which is does not and violate then closing is The following planning steps formulate a intended to be used as a guide vzhen school closing is contemplated. The procedure is set forth in a logical manner\nhowever, uniformly as local conditions require. its sections may be used separately or uniformly as locai i\nuuuii,j.uuo It is primarily intended to identify the various kinds of information as well that should be considered before as the particular activities It is intended that this procedure will be closing a school. the _______________to provide an organized structure for decision-makers when a school closing is being contemplated. followed so as A) acili.tx Evaluations t Facility evaluations are undertaken only when it is apparent that physical condition school. will influence the decision to close the This evaluation should properly identify the 5general condition of the facility and detail any special problems relating to age, structure or utility systems. The evaluations should include an estimate of useful life be made if the facility is continued in service. expectancy and, in particular, an accounting of repairs to Some schools will need to be closed regardless of age and condition. B) Capacity of Facility: Useful capacity should be C) calculated in terms of the numbers of students the facility can accommodate using criteria as established by *  . Each either the Local or State Board of Education. administration must establish its own formula capacity calculations. Suggested methods include: Capacity as ietermined J* Itiplying pupil.'t ratio times the number of classrooms Capacity as determined by dividing square footage in an instructional area by the per pupil square a footage recommended for the purpose for which the area is being used Capacity determined by physical determination cr each academic space as compared to the Board of Education standard capacity may not exceed the class any case, non cue cj-obo size limits as established by the State Board of Education. In Student Enrollments: Present and projected student enrollments should be a necessary part of any decision uO close a school. To decrease the margin of'error, {7) years should minimum period of time of at least seven be established upon which to base population projections. This should be done for the school system as a whole, all schools included. One should be aware of two (2) factors * *  a in projecting populations: a) The relationship between increases or decreases in the general population and school enrollment\nand. 6D) E) b) The need to project enrollment in a given attendance area where it is anticipated that a school may close. would be appropriate to establish an enrollment figure such that if the school falls below this number, that the school will be closed after due process, and all pupils It and school personnel reassigned. A proposal to close Organization of the School SYStemu should consider the organizational needs of the a school including reorganization of particular school system, schools which otherwise might have been closed. examole, be subtracting grades at an elementary level For consideration might facility could be continued in service. add such that o..e Within this context, one examines the long-range programmatic ntc-s of the school system before deciding to close a s\u0026gt;_hool. In doing so, it may be appropriate to close a school for some temporary purpose, which, in the final analysis will seirve the permanent goals of the school system. Cost of operationL To be explicit in one's assessment to close a school, we must calculate the financial costs of operating the facility, and more especially, the funds to    These costs m.ay be be saved by closing the facility. compared to per capita costs of operating other similar schools in the school system. or just simply on the basis that a given amount of money will no longer be spent if the facility is closed. These financial assessments normally include, but are not restricted to the areas of: a) Personnel reassign or eliminated\nb) Utilities for a period of time such as a year\nc) Maintenance and repair costs for a period of t ime\nd) Custodial costs\n7e) Transportation costs,- and, f) Miscellaneous costs. such as insurance. If the facility is to be closed, and not replaced, then obviously a substantial capital outlay may be avoided. If the facility is to be replaced, then a comparison must be made to the expected operational costs which will be determined from a cost analysis of the new facility. Obviously, if the per capita costs decrease. or the same general operational costs remain approximately the for a larger number of students in a more modern facility, then closing would be advantageous to the District. then F) Transportation: It is not 1 T. ays possr 1 o o.a G) H) savings in transportation by closing a school since ass .sporta' ignment of students sometimes increases transportation However, one may well reduce costs in responsibilities. this area by school closing, and it is incun-ibent upon us to assess this accurately. Specifically, rerouting should be buses, plus its effect upon time and distance, A corollary is the need for additional or examined. fewer buses. distance, issue. The relationship among routing, t ime, number of buses, and concomitant costs is the Racial Balance: racial balance enrollment. which so school The administration must recognize that IS a sensitive factor in No administration should take an school action seriously affects pupil assignment as closing a without being completely aware of its ramifications on racial balance. The probability is that racial balance alone will not likely determine whether or not a school is closed. However, it is a sensitive matter that may not be overlooked, this factor carefully. We must calculate Alternative Uses: Alternative uses of the facility must be examined during the analysis process to insure that the facility may not be compatible with the education process in an alternative use. Instructional programs, as well as auxiliary services, should be in an alternative use. as 8considered. Possible alternatives include: a) Special education\nb) Special purpose schools,- c) Social and community purposes\nd) Maintenance and repair services\ne) Storage\nand, f) Office space. irrrent expense to provide the aroremer and capital outlay costs should be me 1 jded 'Vices 1 any assessment of alternative uses. i) Program Considerations.:. In considering a school closing, the administration should determine where students will be reassigned, and what effect closing will have on j) k) program opportunities which result from staff reassignments and the relocation of resources. Tentative Decision: studies school After the administration carefully the facility evaluations. facility capacity. projections. school organizations, cost operation, effect on transportation, alternative uses the facility, effect on racial balance. of for and effect on local governmental planning, the administration should make a tentative decision. If the tentative decision is to close the school, then informal meetings and hearings should be scheduled. Informal MeetinQSu The administration. in conjunction with the Board of Education, should hold public hearings prior to the closing of the school. The administration should, in order to cement good public relations. hold certain informational meetings with their various publics prior to closing. These activities are strictly for the purpose of providing information. answering questions. and most important of all. establishing in the' minds of those affected. that their reactions and opinions are 96) 1) m) being evaluated, public support. School closings are much easier with These meetings should involve, should not necessarily be restricted to: a) b) c) d) but Parents\nSchool-related groups\nLocal government officials\nand, Other local interest groups. Additionally, the administration should keep a displaced faculty-as well informed as can be. Personnel reass ignm.ent plans should prepared and given to soon as possible. Closing Decisions: d c After all essential info: ion has been obtained and evaluated by the administration, and after all essential activities have been carried out, then the administration should approach the Board of Education, in an official session, regarding closing the school. If a school closing is voted upon. then it should be as specific as to termination date, and should be accomplished in conjunction with applicable general statutes regarding property disposal. Disposition of Surplus Property.:. If the closing of the school results in the property being surplus o the District's needs, then applicable laws should be followed regarding this disposition. Final disposition is. of course, at the determination of the Board, and may include the options of demolition, sell, or leasing. SUMMARY: The following checklist summarizes the school closing procedure. EVALUATION OF FACILITY  * * Report on physical condition State useful life expectancy Identify specific maintenance or code problems 10CAPACITY OF FACILITY  Determine formula useful, pupil capacity by approved STUDENT ENROLLMENT  * Project enrollment five {5} years as a minimum Identify minimum enrollment for automatic closing Project enrollment for specific attendance area ORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL SYSTEM if if  if Needs of total school system Reorganization required by closing Cost of operation Current expense in capital outlay of closing S S' r.crs ?er capita costs in compari to Oti TRANSPORTATION if if Rerouting needs including additional i Cost savings, if any RACIAL BALANCE ALTERNATIVE USES  * Total school system, program needs Auxiliary uses PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS TENTATIVE DECISION INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS if Parents, local government officials, local interest groups School related groups, others DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY  Other school system needs Sell Lease 11\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":207,"next_page":208,"prev_page":206,"total_pages":3369,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":2472,"total_count":40428,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":307},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":37},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":34},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":23},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"worksheets","hits":5},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":4},{"value":"study guides","hits":4},{"value":"learning modules","hits":3},{"value":"slide shows","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"Sound","hits":1050},{"value":"StillImage","hits":803},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":213},{"value":"Collection","hits":10},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2076},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":1425},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":777},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":464},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":397},{"value":"AFL-CIO. Civil Rights Department","hits":326},{"value":"Hunter, Charles N., approximately 1851-1931","hits":323},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":244}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Race relations","hits":4661},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":3223},{"value":"People--Ethnic Groups--Hispanics","hits":2928},{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":2321},{"value":"African Americans","hits":1792},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1747},{"value":"Civil rights--South Carolina","hits":1739},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Mississippi","hits":1550},{"value":"League of United Latin American Citizens","hits":1531},{"value":"LULAC","hits":1517},{"value":"Race","hits":1483}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1501},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1413},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":713},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":639},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":623},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":582},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":582},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":418}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2592},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1497},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":622},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":608},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":579},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":360},{"value":"De Laine, Joseph A. (Joseph Armstrong), 1898-1974","hits":345},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":315},{"value":"Samet, Seymour, 1919-2014","hits":279}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1567},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":663},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":386},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":299},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":188},{"value":"Birmingham Bombing (Sixteenth Street Baptist Church)","hits":125},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":104},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":83},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":68},{"value":"Brown versus Board of Education","hits":55},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":43}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":10939},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4304},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":3804},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":3648},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2519},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2032},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1863},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":1801},{"value":"United States, Texas, Harris County, Houston, 29.76328, -95.36327","hits":1564},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":1236},{"value":"United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729","hits":1198}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"South Carolina","hits":6466},{"value":"Georgia","hits":5551},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":3826},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":3452},{"value":"Texas","hits":3432},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":2359},{"value":"Alabama","hits":2352},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1657},{"value":"New York","hits":1561},{"value":"Florida","hits":1185},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":1167}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1962","hits":5885},{"value":"1964","hits":5684},{"value":"1963","hits":5401},{"value":"1965","hits":5249},{"value":"1966","hits":5016},{"value":"1961","hits":4941},{"value":"1968","hits":4914},{"value":"1967","hits":4901},{"value":"1969","hits":4708},{"value":"1960","hits":4681},{"value":"1957","hits":4182},{"value":"1958","hits":4010},{"value":"1977","hits":3976},{"value":"1959","hits":3971},{"value":"1971","hits":3904},{"value":"1970","hits":3870},{"value":"1976","hits":3790},{"value":"1955","hits":3718},{"value":"1974","hits":3664},{"value":"1972","hits":3650},{"value":"1975","hits":3649},{"value":"1956","hits":3611},{"value":"1973","hits":3461},{"value":"1994","hits":3357},{"value":"1995","hits":3332},{"value":"1950","hits":3315},{"value":"1978","hits":3266},{"value":"1954","hits":3261},{"value":"1979","hits":3249},{"value":"1996","hits":3225},{"value":"1980","hits":3158},{"value":"1948","hits":3126},{"value":"1953","hits":3050},{"value":"1997","hits":3036},{"value":"1949","hits":3022},{"value":"1998","hits":2990},{"value":"1999","hits":2983},{"value":"1952","hits":2967},{"value":"1947","hits":2958},{"value":"1951","hits":2907},{"value":"1981","hits":2856},{"value":"2000","hits":2833},{"value":"2001","hits":2792},{"value":"2002","hits":2693},{"value":"1982","hits":2691},{"value":"1946","hits":2690},{"value":"2003","hits":2675},{"value":"1983","hits":2652},{"value":"1945","hits":2610},{"value":"1985","hits":2584},{"value":"1943","hits":2578},{"value":"1944","hits":2577},{"value":"1984","hits":2573},{"value":"1942","hits":2499},{"value":"1941","hits":2473},{"value":"1940","hits":2447},{"value":"1986","hits":2438},{"value":"1939","hits":2375},{"value":"1930","hits":2352},{"value":"1938","hits":2341},{"value":"1937","hits":2323},{"value":"1936","hits":2303},{"value":"2004","hits":2296},{"value":"2005","hits":2270},{"value":"1931","hits":2252},{"value":"1990","hits":2186},{"value":"1987","hits":2183},{"value":"1991","hits":2181},{"value":"1935","hits":2174},{"value":"2006","hits":2165},{"value":"1934","hits":2161},{"value":"1933","hits":2160},{"value":"1932","hits":2150},{"value":"1992","hits":2139},{"value":"1993","hits":2123},{"value":"1989","hits":1879},{"value":"1929","hits":1874},{"value":"1988","hits":1753},{"value":"1928","hits":1509},{"value":"1921","hits":1393},{"value":"1925","hits":1275},{"value":"1927","hits":1272},{"value":"1926","hits":1266},{"value":"1924","hits":1263},{"value":"1923","hits":1208},{"value":"1922","hits":1188},{"value":"1920","hits":1187},{"value":"2007","hits":1029},{"value":"2011","hits":1029},{"value":"2008","hits":1017},{"value":"2010","hits":992},{"value":"2009","hits":980},{"value":"2012","hits":967},{"value":"2013","hits":965},{"value":"2014","hits":924},{"value":"2016","hits":876},{"value":"1919","hits":850},{"value":"1918","hits":849},{"value":"1900","hits":831},{"value":"2015","hits":826}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":301323,"missing":11},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"correspondence","hits":9610},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4200},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3564},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1925},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1690},{"value":"records (documents)","hits":1429},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":1385},{"value":"reports","hits":1362},{"value":"clippings (information artifacts)","hits":1156},{"value":"articles","hits":903},{"value":"transcripts","hits":816}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":13560},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":9168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8110},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6150},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1673},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":1494},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":40},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-NC/1.0/","hits":20},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":12},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-OW-EU/1.0/","hits":2},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3271},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1843},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1717},{"value":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","hits":1696},{"value":"Memphis World","hits":1484},{"value":"James W. Silver Collection","hits":1430},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":1423},{"value":"Integration Correspondence","hits":1420},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":1403}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":3821},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":3419},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3316},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3287},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3250},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2174},{"value":"South Carolina Digital Library","hits":2167},{"value":"University of South Carolina. South Carolina Political Collections","hits":1793},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":1663},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":1641},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":1435}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":40191},{"value":"Collection","hits":237}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":40278},{"value":"true","hits":150}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}