{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1675","title":"Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to PCSSD's motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA); District Court, report of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) assessment of the equitable allocation of resources; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''Achievement Disparity between the Races in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1998-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School management and organization","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School improvement programs","School employees","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to PCSSD's motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA); District Court, report of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) assessment of the equitable allocation of resources; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''Achievement Disparity between the Races in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1675"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["21 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  RECEn,eo RECEJVE,:, - OCT 8 1998 JN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 8 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ~\\ EASTERN I\u003eISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING  .  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v.   No~ LR-C-82-866 : PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL  .... . . .. l .  DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. -DEFENDANTS ADE'S RESPONSE TO PCSSD'S   .. ; ... _ - . _. . . . . . . \" 'MOTIO. N T. .O . EN-F.O RC.E T. HE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT   - AS REGARDS MFPA\" . On September 8, PCSSD filed a \"Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement As - Regards MFPA.\"'  Attached to PCSSD's motion is an-unauthenticated exhibit that . purports to demonstrate that PCSSD received less state aid during fiscal years 1997 through 1999 than PCSSD \"would have received\" if the States' public school funding system had not been changed during the l995 legislative session and thereafter.1 In the purported motion, PCSSD does not cite to a single provision of the Settlement Agreement th~t has allegedly bee:. violated.  Instead, PCSSD -relies exclusively on language in the Eighth Circuit's July l, 1998 opinion concerning the . narrow issues of teacher retirement and health insurance funding and argues that, \"to . '. PCSSD~s \"motion~.does not contain any affidavit o~ declaration explai~ing who created the exhibit, explaining the ,- -~urce ~ta'or method6logy used, or explaining ~hat assuritptioris were made.in arriving at the alleged\" Act 34 . :     . , ~t~orri~~ for fiscaryears 1_997 through'. i999: f.s: such, even if P\u003c;Ssps m~tioii were in the nature of a motion for . ..  summary judgmen~ ~ibit A to PCSSD's motion could not~ con~idered ~ evidence and could not be relied upon ... , ~to support any)t~ding ofliability on ih~ part of ADE . See Wright, ~1iller \u0026 Kime, .Federal Practice and Procedure:  Civil 3d 2723; -.,~-390 ( 1998) (\"{T]he court may riot take cognizance of positions regarding the facts based on 1  ,' comply with the holdings of the Court of Appeals,\" PCSSD must be held harmless from any alleged adverse effect of the overall change in the funding system. Thus, although it is styled as a \"motion,\" PCSSD's latest filing is in fact a thinly-veiled attempt to file yet another brief on the \"teacher retirement\" and \"health insurance\" remedy issue currently . pending before this Court, in contravention of this Court's established briefing schedule. PCSSD's \"motion\" should therefore be stricken as untimely and not considered by the Court. In its earlier submissions to this Court, ADE has presented its arguments as to the appropriate method for calculating the \"remedy\" on the issues of teacher retirement and health insurance. However, in the event.this Court accepts PCSSD's latest filing as an additional submission on the teacher retirement and health insurance \"remedy\" issue, ADE requests that it be given the opportunity to submit evidence and argument concerning the accuracy and appropriateness of PCSSD' s \"Act 34\" calculations for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and concerning the appropriateness of PCSSD's suggested method for calculating an appropriate teacher retirement and health insurance \"'remedy.\"  Finally, even if the Court were to treatPCSSD's submission.as a motion separate and apart from the pending . proceedings on the retirement and health insurance remedy, . PCSSD's motion should be summarily denied. As noted earlier, PCSSD's motion does not identify a single provision of the Settlement Agreement that has :exJ.tibits that arc merely part of the brief and have not been otherwise verified or supported.\").; see also Fed. R. Evid. 801,802 and 901. 2 allegedly been violated, and therefore the motion fails to state a claim upon which relief niy be granted as against ADE. Further, PCSSD's latest motion appears to be a rehash of the unsuccessful motion for summary_ judgment PCSSD filed late last year. See PC5.5P's \"Separate Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of the State Funding Formula,\" filed September 2, 1997. This Court denied that motion on January 12, 1998, because 1'there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding the state funding fon;nula\" (see Docket Entry No. 3104), and PCSSD's most recent motion should be denied for the same reason.  Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General TIMOT Assistant Attorney General : 323- Center Street, Suite 200 ,_, - Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for  :Arkansas Department of Education 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . I, Timothy qauger, . certify that on October -6, 1998, I caused a copy of the .. foregoing . document to be  served by first class U.S. Mail~ postage prepaid, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated:  M. Samuel Jones, III . Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings ~-\\ . .\" 2000 NationsBank Plaz.a .  200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. . 1723 Broadway     Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell    401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock; AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg . . 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown -; _ Office of.Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 4 I .OCT 7 Fil r.:p IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .. L-: --' -~~Glr llB8WireBAllomMIDI~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANsAs9n OCT - 7 PN L. WESTERNDMSION J.t'.f;'~-.:: l, , ,.. \" I  19 LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATIIBRINE KNIGHT, ET AL REPORT OF LRSD'S ASSESSMENT U ::  .. , . I ,!,t. n ~r' 1 ~., . .). u;-; , ,. c\" .  '.!,/, , r, ;\",, [( v , ~, f C -'1 -r \"'\"- L. l \\ f\\ BY .J ,1 I , AR. ---s~-U' 1 7:~~~IFF '\" '  l, Lt.RK DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS OF THE EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES Plaintiff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Report ofLRSD's Assessment of the Equitable Allocation of Resources states: 1. LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") requires that LRSD assess the equitable allocation of resources in the district and report the results of this assessment within 180 days of the district court's approval of the Revised Plan. Revised Plan 2.9.2. The district court approved the Revised Plan on April 10, 1998. Docket No. 3144. Accordingly, LRSD's report of the assessment of the allocation of resources was to be completed on or before October 7, 1998. LRSD files this report in compliance with the Revised Plan. 2. LRSD assessed the allocation of its resources by way of a committee composed of district administrators and staff persons and representatives of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\").1 The committee first worked to determine what \"resources\" should be assessed. In this regard, the committee looked to available research in the area of school resources. Based on the available research and the committee's collective education and experience, the committee decided to assess the equitable allocation of resources in the district by examination often factors: (1) pupil/teacher ratio; (2) pupil/staff ratio; (3) square feet per pupil; ( 4) percentage of staff with a masters degree and nine or more years of experience; (5) the turnover rate of certified staff; (6) school size; (7) the computer/pupil ratio; (8) per pupil expenditure; (9) volunteer hours per pupil; and, (10) donations per pupil. 3. Pupil/Teacher Ratio. Research indicates that smaller class sizes (15 or less to 1 ) may improve achievement of minority students. See,~ Nye, B.A, Achilles, C.M., Zaharias, J.B., Fulton, B.D., Wallenhorst, M.P., Small Is Far Better, Paper presented at Mid-South Educ. Res. Ass'n, Knoxville, Tenn. (Nov. 13, 1992). The committee measured its pupil/teacher ratio using October 1, 1997 enrollment and certified staff at the school excluding administrators, counselors and librarians. The committee decided to exclude four-year-old classes, which have a smaller pupil/teacher ratio, because not all LRSD schools have four-year-old classes. 4. Pupil/Staff Ratio. The committee also wanted to include a measure which would recognize the importance of school administrators and other support staff at a school. In addition to certified teachers, this factor includes all other school based personnel with the exception of 1The committee members were as follows: Dr. Victor Anderson, Associate Superintendent for Operations; Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent for Instructional Services; Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent for Administrative Services; Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent for School Services; Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services; Brady Gadberry, Special Assistant to the Superintendent; Dr. Ed Williams, Research Specialist and Statistician; Ann Brown, Federal Desegregation Monitor; Skip Marshall, Associate Federal Desegregati9n Monitor; and, Gene Jones, Associate Federal Desegregation Monitor. 2 federal and food service employees. As with teachers, a lower pupil/staff ratio is considered more favorable with the goal being equity in the staffing formula. 5. Sguare Feet Per Pupil. The committee found that the school overcrowding can have a negative impact on student achievement. The Council of Education Facility Planning standards recommends 90 sq. ft. per pupil for elementary schools, 120 sq. ft. per pupil for middle schools and 145 sq. ft. per pupil for high schools. Using 3D International's 1995 Facilities Master Plan Study, the committee assessed schools based on the number of square feet per pupil with the assumption that the more space the better. Students in schools below the standard may not have adequate instructional space. 6. Percentage of staff with a masters degree plus and nine. In a 1990 study, researchers found that African-American student performance improved when teachers had strong language skills, nine or more years of experience and a master's degree or higher. Ferguson, R, Racial patterns in how school and teacher quality affect achievement and learning, In Challenge: A Journal of Research on Black Men (1990). Based on this study, the committee decided to measure the allocation of quality teachers by considering the percentage of teachers at a school with at least a masters degree plus nine years of experience. A higher percentage of being more favorable. 7. Turnover Rate of Certified Staff. Low turnover among certified staff plays an important role in building a strong and committed teaching staff and a strong base of parental and community support. High turnover, on the other hand, often results in an inexperienced teaching staff. See,~ Newmann, F.M. and Wehlage, G.G., Successful School Restructuring (1995). The committee calculated the turnover rate by comparing the number of new teachers at a school 3 (both new hires and transfers) to the total number of teachers at a school. The schools were then ranked based on the percentage of new teachers with the assumption that low turnover was most favorable. 8. School size. Recent studies indicate that school size, like class size, may impact student achievement. See,~ Howley, C.B., Synthesis of the effects of school and district size, What research says about achievement in small school and school districts, 41 Journal of Rural and Small Schools 2 (1989). Small schools promote better personal relationships between staff, students, parents and the community. Student morale tends to be higher because of a feeling of belonging. Teachers communicate better with each other and know students better allowing them to teach in a more individualized way. In assessing school size, the committee simply looked at the each school's enrollment and ranked the schools under the assumption that smaller was better. 9. Computer/Pupil Ratio. The committee developed the computer/pupil ratio as a proxy for assessing technological resources as provided for in the Revised Plan. LRSD has already begun implementation of its technology plan designed to bring the district in line with state and national technology standards. The ratio includes only network compatible computers in schools by September 22, 1998. A higher computer/student ratio was considered more favorable. 10. Per Pupil Expenditure. Pouring money into a school provides no guarantee of improving improved achievement. Even so, per pupil expenditure is perhaps the most commonly used factor for assessing the equitable allocation of resources. The committee calculated each school's per pupil expenditures based on the school's discretionary funds. This excluded expenditures for salaries, benefits, utilities and federal funding provided under Title I and for food 4 service. To prevent outliers based on extraordinary expenditures, the committee used a three year moving average for expenditures. 11. Volunteer Hours Per Pupil. Volunteer hours per pupil indicate the degree of parental and community involvement at a school. Authorities recognize the importance of parental and community involvement in school success. See. u., Graue. M.E . Weinstein, T., and Walberg, H.J., School Based Home Reinforcement Programs: A Quantitative Synthesis, 76 Journal Educ. Res. 351 (1983). Volunteer hours by school were obtained from the LRSD VIPS department. 12. Donations Per Pupil. Like volunteer hours. donations indicate the degree of parental and community involvement at a school. Donations may also fill in gaps left due to inadequate discretionary funding provided to a school by the district. Only donations accepted by the LRSD Board of Directors were considered. 13. Exhibit 1 contains the results of the committee's assessment of each of these factors for each school in the district. 14. The committee also undertook to determine whether any relationship existed between the resources allocated to a school and the percentage of African-American students attending a school. The committee enlisted Dr. Ed Williams ofLRSD's Planning, Research and Evaluation Department to determine if such a relationship existed. Using statistical measures, Dr. Williams combined the ten factors in order to assign each school a composite score. See Exhibit 2, \"Equitable Allocation Worksheet\" and \"Composite School Scores.\" Dr. Williams then compared each school's composite score to the school's percentage of African-American students. See Exhibit 2. \"Correlations.\" Dr. Williams concluded that there was no significant 5 relationship between the racial makeup of a school and the amount of resources allocated to the school. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK First Commercial Bldg., Suite 2000 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY: 6 stopher Heller (#81083) C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on this 7th day of October, 1998. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Banlc Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A 425 W. Capito~ Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES 10-07-98 EQUITY INDICATORS 1. Pupil/ Teacher Ratio Less Than 15 2. Pupil/ Starr Ratio Less Than 9 3. Sq. Ft./ Pupil : Elem 90, Jr 120, Sr 145 4. % or Starr w/ 9 yrs \u0026 Masters Degree 5. Turnover Rate or Certified Stafr 6. School Size 7. Computer/ Pupil Ratio 8. Per Pupil Expenditure 9. Volunteer Hours / Pupil 10. Donations / Pupil -... 1 ,I.D.. I  ::z: X Ill 1-.-.... .,,.... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ... - . ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES   - - . 10-07-98  -  -.  OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLLMENT . TOTAL TEACH PUP-PIK PUP-PIK -   -  PIK  K  T 12 tor TOT-PIK sL  WH 0TH roT 0/4BL % WH o,,;;OTH F.T.I~:- F.T.E. i STAFF \"{TEACH HIGHSCHOC\u003eLS .  - -   .. .. .. -    . ........ .  -  -     -- -.. ---- - -- ... - ---            - -  -  -- -       --- --- -- -- . .  - - -- . . - - - -- - - ....    --- --  -- -- - - - . CENTRAL 34 1821 1855 1855 1101 705 49 1855 59% 38% 3% 147.94 100.14 HALL ...  . .... . .. -  --  - 7  783 790 790 561 179 - -so ... 790 . 'h0io -23/~ --- .6io --- .. g-,fgQ 62.70    - - - - - - -  ---   .    --   - --  - - -------- - .. - - .. - - - --- . FAIR 757 757 757 612 137 8 757 81% 18% 1% 82.50 53.20 9.18 McCLELLAN -----  -- -  .. -  935 ___ _ 935 935 790 121 ... 24 -  g35 84i~ --faiii., ____ .. 3% ____ ___ 98.'fo _ .. __ 65.90 - .  9.53 PARKVIEW ... ... -... . ...... - - - 9f1 .... 'gd 911 464 403 44  911 51% 44/~ --- s0/o ---ag~io. - S!'i.40 10.21 12.54 8.32 18.52 12.60 14.23 14.19 TOTAL   ... .. . -- - ---  - o 41 5207 -524.8 5248 3528 1545 175 \"52,ia 6ii'lo - 29%  ' \"310 - sh64 341 .34 10.24 15.34 jiJNioR HIGH-sdfo'6U,-- -- -.. _.. ---.. .. - . - .   -- -   ---- -- -   - ..  -  -...  - .. ___ 15. 37 DUNBAR -  -- - .. --        - 771 771  .,_771 442 ... 282 - 47 771 57% 37% 6o/o .... . 70.io- FOREST HEIGHTS . .. . .... _  648 648 648 452 178 18 648 70% 27% 3% 73.90 PULASKfHEIGHTS - -    - -- - - - -  -767 --757 --  i67 - 437 315 - 15  - 757 . 57/~ -41% -- 2/4 .. _. 76.80 soui'i-lWEst  -  - ---.. -- - -- -- -- -- - --- -5fo .... sfo --s10 --- ,i2i5 -.... 65 ----19 - .. . 5fo . 84% 13% - 4/0 -- 6Ci.o6 HENDERSON-- --- ... __________ ___ -   - . 724 --124 .  - 724 624 83 11 . ---724 . 86% . 11% 2% . --1tf i:m CLOVERDALE   . . .. .. . .. - ..... -- -  622 622  -  622  - 552 36 34 622 89% .. .... i3/4  - ... 5% . ... 53jm- MABELVALE .. . . - _,. - .. -  .. 506 506 506 380 119 7 506 75% 24% 1% .. . . 61.36 MANN .  ....  - . .. ... ... - -    - - 85a - a58 858 446 375 37 858 .. sioj~ ---44% 4/0 . - . iff!i.1f totAL ... ...  - -     -   - -- a --o 5406 5406  -- s,foi3 3159 1453 rn4 5406 10% 21% 4% 564.90 ELEMENTARY SCHoocs -.. -   -- - . - .. - . - -- . - -- - - --- . .. . . ...... - . --- .. - .. .. .. 48.80 51 .30 56.30 42.40 53.30 44.80 41 .90 58.30 397.10 BALE ..  --   - 35  s1 . -216 362 327 265  11  26 362 73% 20% . . 1% .. 42.20 23.30 BRADY .. .. . ........ ----- -- - - - ---;a --56 - 298 .372 ....... .. 354 \"\"235 ....... 94 .. 43 - 372 \"tbii/4 - -25/o --f2% --- 35~io 20.30 BADGETT - . . ....... --  ---- ---- -31 ---jg ---163 233 -- -202  -214 -Tg ..... - i:33 \".92% -- --a;~ -- ---c:i'0/4 --- - 2O.io  15.30 McDER.MOTT ...... ... .. ...... ...    54 423 ,iii  \"\"4f7 .... 273 181 ... 23 ---- 4ii -s1io -- 380/o - .... s0;; .. .. 43.30 26.90 BASELINE :: : :~::;: -.-~:.::::~: -~::.~_: -~~5 ::-:~~ _=_2_~4 .: - -323  2aa -267  38 -  10  - Jij  83/o ---120,,~ ---- 5io . .. 3cf96 . 18) 0 FAIR .. PARK 36 36 176 248 -- -i12  ---188 50 10 248 75iij.  -20% 4% 27.00 1:i:ifo . FOREST PARK  -  .... ...    .. .. Si  373 430 430 205 219 6 430 48% 51% . . 1/~ 38.00 23.00 CHIC6T - .. . . ...... -- -- --.. - js -sg ---,i43 5j7 ------ --soi 370 . T21 46 537 -69% ---23i~ .... 9% ---- s9-:fo .. -29:40 WESTERNHILLS ...  - - .. -- - -jg --216 .... jfa --- 315 ... 222 91 2 315 70% 29% 1% -- 29~30  - 1 i:1O JEFFEl'fsoN ,   - --    --   Ka  --455 - sfa ....  ... 5f3  221 219 1 54% 1% 44 .oo 21.10 CLOVERDALE . .. . .... .. -35   ii 404 512 476   469  3ci 13 6% 3% 41 .10 .. 24 .30 6'600 -   -- .. _.   - ......  - 2.; :2oci  224 ----- 224 145 14 5 \"J3i~ -  iii. --- 30:cio 11.30   -  --    -   -    --- . - ........ .. - - -  . . . . . . - - -  [,~~:~:!:::$ r ~! i ;i I~: :~ mm 2 ~: H ~;m :~ !;!i ~rn 513 44% 512 92% 224 65% 332 79% 658 54% 316 75% . .1..0 .98 8.77 9.99 8.50 9.41 9.73 8.25 10.48 9.57 7.75 9.78 7.14 - --1-1 .02 7.80 7.05 ...1.. 1 .32 8.48 10.75 11 .66 .1.1. .58 7.47 10.18 8.36 8.26 15.80 12.63 13.62 12.03 13.58 13.88 12.08 14.72 13.61 14.03 17.44 . . - ~ . . .. - 13.20 17.73 15.40 15.25 18.70 17.07 18.42 18.93 19.59 12.95 17.95 14.68 16.73 LITTLE ROC. . K.. ..S CHOOL DISTRICT  - . ... -..   -  ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES 10-07-98   - .. OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLiMEt-ii'         TOTAL TEACH PUP-P/K PUP-P/K   -     PIK K 1-12 TOT TOT-PiK al wH 0TH TOT % BL % WH 0;{ 0TH F.T.E. F:t.i:. I STAFF /TEACH PULASKI HEIGHTS     -   ... 4.0 424   464 464 254 193   17 464 55%  42io  - 4io  . 39.20 22.90 11.84 20.'26 ROMINE - - -    35  6i - 230 --328  . 292 206 ... 78  ~f4  328 .. fa% ... i4% 13% .. . jgjij 23.00 7.47 . - 12.70 WASHINGTON      - - - - --5j --83 --s24 --fiifo -- 607 --352 -2fa 95 660 53% 32% 14% 80.10 46.60 7.58 ... -1io3 wiLsoN --     -- -- :;a  --s4 - -fgo - Ji32  - 344 -297  s3 12 - 362 a2io -1s0i; - ':loio - -ja.Jo 23.10 8.98 14.89 woobihiFF     - - -- . 34  40 -2fo   284  i5o  201   15 8   20-1. 71 i~ --26/o 3% 32.40 17.80 7. 72 . . .. 1fci4 MABEL.VALE. -    - -  15 - .. s-1 h1 -  407 . - 391 299  92   fo  407 1:Wo -~i:3,i.; ---~f -- 4cY.i3if --23~9if - -- g:53 16.36 TERRY    -    -    - ys 435 -sf1 - Kf1 2j5  243 .. 33 511 46% 48% 6% 47.20 28.20 10.03 10.12 FUCBRIGHT        69 426 495 495 240 246 9 495 480/o 50i~ -- 2i~ . . 51.90 28.80 9.54 17.19 OTTER CRE.Ek'          J6 -2~i\"2 -Ji8 . -  320 -1s1 167 10  320  46% s1% - - - 3% .... 30.10 16.60 .10.90 19.76 WAKEFiELt\u003e\"      ---  - - -52 - - j21 -373 373 -322 . 32  19  373 . a50io  gcy~ -siii~ . - :foji .. 2cf5ci 10.26 ..  1a .2ff WATSON    - ... - -- - 36 73 384 493 457 - 441 40  12 -- - 493 - 89/o ---8/o  . 2%. - 43)5 - 25.90. F.RANKLIN-     72 77 3f5 --464 - 392 --427  -24  13 -464 g2i~ - -5% - 3   73_-96 .. jif5O GARLAND     --  fa  -34 -219 --2if  -- 253 -253  -3 ... 15 ... 271 . g:foj. .. - 1o/~ - -6)~ ..... 47:30 I1 .ao MITC.HELC      -  ~1a -37 ---1ai -- i42   2i4 223  -- g ... fo  242 .!)2/o .... 4/4  4 . .. 4{:fo .. 21 .90. RocKEFELLER. --  -   - s3 ..... 53  299 -- 405  -3s2 :fai na   3o  ;:fris 59% 34%  - 1o;;.   19.90 32.90 R1i3Hri;ELi:.      --     fa 39 - fai -- 249    -231 234 9 6  2-19  94% 4%  2% 39.50 21 .00 EJOOKER        -- -     16 --s21 sg1  --597 Joa 251 . ia - 597 si0i~  44oj~ - so,,; ... 5:ffo .... 44 .50 CARVER  -  -    -  -- -   60 536  595  - sg5  --:i12 ... 259 25 .... 596 52/o 43%  4% - 63.90 39.20 Gies-s  -       -   --   - 39 -212  311  \"jfl - 161 133 17 .. . 511 -52o/o 43% 5% 40.30 . 25.30 WILLIAMS       -     - .. .. cio --419 479 -  479  240 214 17 479 52% 45% 4% 52.30 31 .10 TOTAL --    704 fiia4 11583 14171 13467 9335 4151 685 .14171  66% -29%    s 0io f.575j4 ai33.4O     -    0  0 -  o O --- - - ---   - - 0   ---  --  -   -  . .. .. . .. . --  -  0 0 0 0 0 -  - - H o --    0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0  00 0 00 00 0,0  --H o   - -    - 00  -     .. ,o , o 0  0 0  o o o   0 0000 -0 0  --- .. ---- .. .. 10.45 17.64 . ....   - 5.30 - 10.74 .. - 5.35 11 .61 5.07 10.23 - -- - - .. . 4.41 10.70 5.85 11 .00 9.37 13.42 9.33 15.20 7.72 12.29 9.16 15.40 8.54 15.24      -       ----- ------ -- - ---- - - - - ------ ---- ------ -- ----- -      - -  -- - - .. -- . - . . -  - ----------- --- -  --- -- - - ----. - . - . - -   .... - . - ... -      704 1925 22196 24825 24121 16622 7149 1054 24825 67% 29% 4% 2653.88 1621 .84 9.09 14.87 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT  -  --ALLocATION OF RESOlJRcEs----- - ..   -- .. . ... .. . ..... -- - ... . 10-07-90 ENROL[ . s60ARE SITE -   --. 10-1-97 -- FOOTAGE. AtREAGE CENTRAL   -  ----    1:oss   - 266,023  16.50 i-ii\\LC  --  --. --- .... . .. .. 'foci . - - 1s2,:i4ff  - -- \":if:10 FAIR   151   fai;ioo ----so.oo McCLELLAN 935 129,000 29.60 PARKVIEW - -  911 166,477 30.00 rnTAL - --  ------ -sj4a   --o-i 'i:cioa  -fs'(20 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS  - --   .. - ---- ---  SOFT/ .ENRoi..C 174.75 130.05 102.74 161.40 DUNBAR  771  --gfj97 - --  --5.\"cio\" 1 :z8~92 FOREST HEIGHTS 640 70,207 26.00 -------1-.0 8.47- i\u003eDLAsi\u003ci Heie,Rrs - - --- -    - 16i.    fa.ifo  - ----,foo =-=:y.s~jI SOUTHWEST 510 02,960 30.00 162.60 HENDERSON 724 103,212 46.36 142.56  CLOVERDALE 622  0 1--,-0--9--7  --- --- ------8.-0 0- - ---- -1--3-1--.6--7-- - ------- ------ --- ----- -- -- MABEL VALE 506 62,030 12.00 122.60 MANN  050 113,013 . - 12.29 - --fafii TOTAL 5,406 ao6,o2o   ..143.65 -126:oci ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS -  -   --- - -- -  BALE  - 362    33,626 - - - -:10.\"{iff -----g:fj39 BRADY -  372     _35,259 .  . ....... . tiio 97.47 BADGETT  233 23,404 .  -- \"f\u003cfoO. - - -- ffio:45 McDERMOTT 477 -  ,fo.02() --10:ifo --100:57 BASELINE 323 50,455 4.00 156.21 FAIR PARK 240 20,067 4.20 116.40 FOREST PARK 430 31,914 2.10 74.22 CHICOT   537  - ifo:Goi - --1 0:4\"6 ---f1Ll5 WESTERN HILLS 315   -- -10,iiTf    - -14:00  - 34.64 JEFFERSON -.  - 513 43,546 12.00 -- 04.00 crovi:RoAT.E - -   - --   - 512 33,263 a.oo - --134:01 DODD  224 46,71i  ----!Qfo . --208~54 MEADOWCLIFF 332 36,931 9.60 - 111.24 l\u003cING -- - - -  -  --  :-553  - -15,ooo - - 4:so -  113.98 GEYER SPRINGS 316 41,700 4.30 132.22 PULASKI HEIGHTS    - -  -464  -- s11.2si ---soo - ---125.54. ROMINE    --- ----- - ---320  -- 4i;j14 . 20:00 ---faifo1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT  ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES . . . . . - .. .... - . 10.07.90 sciLiARE wASHINGTON .. .. . ... . .. - - . . ... 660 o!i,ifoo WILSON . . .. . .... . . .. - ..... --   36i 37,075 WOODRUFF - 204 -- - :30,000 MABEL.VALi~- --  -   - 407 55,568 rEFfRv-------------------- ----------  -s11 -- --- ---- - 4!;:312 FULBRIGHT  495 . ........ 66:892 OTTER CREEK 320 36,551 WAKEFIELb - -  - . .. . . . ..........  373 Ji,395 WATSON   -  493 - - - ifa:ii,fo SITE --- so FT/ ACREAGE -  -ENROLL. 5:!io  ....... faifos -   s.ai'i' --10f4i 2.10 10.00 15.00 19.00 8.90  1f.:io 133.00 136.53 08.67 135.14 111:;i\"4 100.25 --- - ----  ... --- ------- . - .. -- -. FRAN1\u003ci..1~.;- - - ----      464 - so.soo 12.20 109.22 GARLAND  211 30,632 --- f :fo MITCHELL 242    .:i9,ioo 4.20 10.00 147.63 142.55 161 .98 159.41 1sf12 124.04 103.52 119.73 ROCKEFELLER 405     .6{ Sih RiGi-h'sECC - -         .  ... . -  .. 2,iri - -- 37 ,630 BOOKER 597 74,530 CARVER . --  -- -       - .. 596 - .. .. 61 ,695 GIBBS  311  :i7,237 wid:.1AMs     ..  479 47,200 6.30 2.10 12.00 s:oo 15.00 ....  gifs-1 TOTAL .    \" 1{ 171  1,GJ0,5i55  ---- -------- -.. . _ - - - - - - -- . . --  - ....... - ...     - . -- --- . . . . . - ......3 -0.5.. .90- . - ... -1- .1. .5.. .-0--6. -- - -- -.. ..... ________ ----. - .   .. . GRAND TOTAL 24 ,025 3, 163.siff 606.75 127.44 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT   -  - - --ALLocAfi6t.f6F RESOURCES - - - -- -  - . - - -.  -  ---- - -  . --- -. -- .. . . - -- . -- ... . -- - .. ----- -- -- --- ....... ------- - - --- 100798 ENROLL MASTERS + 9 TEACH % --   ---- -- - . - --- ----       - - - ---  - ........ --- - ---HIGH SCHOOLS  --- - -- ------- ----- - ------- 10197 F.T.E. CENTRAL 1,855 56 107.14 52% HALL 790 32 66.70 48% FAIR  - --------- -- - - --- - - ---------  - -t---- McCLELLAN 935 29 70.90 41 % 757 30 57.20 52% PARKVIEW - 911  35 ---5:f4()- -------553/0 TOTAL   ..... - -5.2~;-8 .. --- - - .. 182 -355_34 50% JUt-ii6rf\"i;i\"GHScHo6Ui .. ...... .  .. .......... . ...... - .  - -- DUNBAR 771 23 52.80 44% FOREST HEIGHTS 648 23 54 .30 42% PULAsi\u003cfl-iEiGHts  - .    --;67      22  si:fo 31o;o SOUTHWEST   510.  ---  19  -4s:40  --,f2 HENDERSON - - -    - 12,f - 20 57.30 35% -- --- - -- - -- -- --------- -- ----- ....... __ -- -    --------------- . . -- - -- - -- -- -  - . CLOVERDALE 622 14 47.80 29% MABEL VALE 506 13 44.90 29% MANN 858  30 62.30   - -~18/o TOTAL 5,406 164 424.10 39%  ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS --   ---- - -  - .. - . - - -- BALE -- - - - - -  -- ----35i --------14 --2s-:-30 ---55)0 BRADY-  - ---- -  - . J'i2 . . - --- 1s -2i30  ---- Bi% BADGETT - -  -  - -  - . faj 8 17.30 46% McDERMOTT 477 9 29.40 31% BASELi~iE - 323  11 20. 10  53% FAIR PARK 248 10 15.90 63% FOREST.PARK 430 .  -- -- - ---11 - is:oo --44o/o CHICOT - -   537     --- 14 31 .90 - 44/o WESTERN HILLS 315  - ---- --- ------1- 0 - - 1-9.1-0- - --  -- 5--2--%- JEFFERSON 513 20 29.60 68% CLOVERDALE 512 13 26.80 49%   -- - - -- --  ------------  -- -   - - - .. - - ... -- ... . - -- -- --~  . DODD 224 9 19.30 47% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT   ALlOCATibN OF RESOUFfCES - - . --  ........     -- - -- ---- -- .. . . 10-07-98  ---  -   --- -- ... -- --- -  - -- - ENROLL MASTERS + 9  TEACH % - ---- ----  - - -- .. - --- - -- -  ... - - .. . ..   10-1-97 F.T.E. MEAi56WCLi\"FF---------- ------- -332 11 20.so 54% Ki NG - --- -- -  -  . .. . - 658 ..... ......... 17 . \" - -,b.oo -- -40%    - GEYER SPRINGS 316 - -----------10- ----- --1--8- .--8---0- 53% PULASKI HEIGHTS 464 12 25.40 47%  --- --- -----. ---------- -- - - .. - --- - --- ------- -    . -- -  - _ ,. __ ... . . . - ---- ------- ROMINE 328 10 25.00 40% WASHINGTON-- - -- -    -iiicf - - 11 - -50:16 -- ----3-4iij~ WILSON 362 19 25.10 76%  WOODRUFF - -- - . 284 . -- - . 5 ...... 1ti:ao .  ---30io MABELVALE 407  - -    6 --  25~90.  -  -23.0/o T-E R-R--Y--- -- ---- --- ------- -------- -- - -- ---- -- ------  .. - - "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1674","title":"Court filings concerning motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA), petition for award of attorneys' fees and costs, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the PCSSD,","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1998-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Little Rock School District","Joshua Intervenors","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Lawyers","School management and organization","School integration","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA), petition for award of attorneys' fees and costs, and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the PCSSD,"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1674"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["50 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA); District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) brief in support of its motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA); District Court, North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) petition for award of attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendant; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) fee petition; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for attorneys' fees and costs; District Court, Joshua intervenors' comments on the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD); District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) response to Joshua proposed finds of fact and conclusions of law; District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion to enforce the settlement agreement as regards minimum foundation program aid (MFPA); District Court, order; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to defer consideration of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's), Little Rock School District's (LRSD's), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) motions for attorneys' fees and costs; District Court, brief in support of Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to defer consideration of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's), Little Rock School District's (LRSD's), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) motions for attorneys' fees and costs; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.   ' .. .. ... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. RECEIVED DEFENDANTS SEP 9 1998 MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS OfflCE OF KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ~CGATimHtiOi11TORING INTERVENORS PCSSD'S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS REGARDS MFPA The PCSSD for its Motion states: 1. The PCSSD has previously acquainted this Court with the negative impact Act 917 had, and is having, upon the PCSSD. 2. Exhibit A to this Motion is an updated calculation utilizing the same methodology reviewed and approved by this Court on February 18, 1997. 3. This exhibit demonstrates that the PCSSD lost three million, six hundred and fifty-seven thousand, six hundred and sixty-nine dollars ($3,657,669) in 1996-97 as compared to Act 34, two million, forty-seven thousand, six hundred and seventy-six dollars ($2,047,676) in 1997-98 and that Act 917 will cost the District four million, one hundred and twenty-two thousand, four hundred and fifty-seven dollars ($4, 122,457) during the current school year. 4. The Court of Appeals has ordered that the three Pulaski districts should be placed in a position no worse than they would have occupied if the previous system (Act 34) of funding for teacher retirement and health insurance had not been changed. 5. To comply with the holdings of the Court of Appeals, the PCSSD should be awarded the sums set forth in Exhibit A to this Motion. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 060) aunty Special School CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September __i_, 1998 a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg. , Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 53481 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 2 MFPA CALC: ESTIMATES: DISTRICT LINE SCHOOL YEAR NO. CHARGE RATE 1 WADM DATA 2 REG. 3QADM 3 SPEDWADM  4 VOCWADM  5 VOCCWADM* 6 G\u0026 TWADM  7 MAGADM 8 LOSS FD WADM 9 TOT. WADM 10 M-to-M OUT 11 SBER CALCULATIONS 12 STATE FUNDS 13 AMOUNT ADDED 14 TOTAL ST. 15 AV AMT. 16 CHARGE RA TE 17 TOTAL AV CHG 18 TOTAL MISC. FDS. 19 TOTAL RESOURSES 20 TOT. WADM (73,892)  21 SBER 22 DIFFERENCE 23 AVE. LOC. RES. 24 MFPA CALCULATION 25 TOTAL A. V. 26 X CHG. 31 MISC. REV. 75% 32 LOCAL RES. 33 NO. M. D. 34 M.D. CR. 35 NET LOC. RES. 36 LOC. RES. RATE 37 SBER 38 TABLE RATE 39 TOT. MFPA 40 MFPA CHANGE 41 ADDITIONAL FUNDING 42 TEACHER RET. \u0026 HEAL TH INS. COST 43 AT RISK 44 TRANS 45 TOT. ADD. STATE FUNDS 46 TOT. STATE FUNDS 47 TOTAL CHANGE 48 ACT 917 FUNDING + DEBT SERV. 49 TOTAL MORE OR (LESS) THAN ACT 34  NUMBERS REMAIN AT 1995-96 LEVELS CHG. INC= (AMT. ADD./2500000)/1000 ACT 34 FOR 96-97 97-98 \u0026 98-99 ACT34978.WK PCSSD PCSSD PCSSD PCSSD 1995-96 , 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 0.0278 0.0315 0.0334 0.0358 19,070.30 19,074.36 18,801 .98 18,339.84 1,950.70 1,950.70 1,950.70 1,950.70 712.45 712.45 712.45 712.45 26.01 26.01 26.01 26.01 246.00 246.00 246.00 246.00 963.41 951 .41 978.17 978.17 539.39 159.12 166.49 389.97 23,508.26 23,120.05 22,881.80 22,643.14 402.66 394.01 581.14 581 .14 $963,200,241 $963,200,241 $1 ,056,899,739 $1 ,104,528,360 $963,200,241 $1 ,056,899,739 $1,104,528,360 $1, 164,528,360 $17,015,999,575 $18,376,728,665 $19,816,194,517 $20,410,680,353 0.0278 0.0315 $473,044,788 $578,866,953 $5,215,335 $5,171,702 $1 ,441 ,460,364 $1,640,938,394 521 ,731 519,249 $2,762.84 $3,160.21 $397.37 $907 $1,115 $737,033,624 $786,594,811 $20,489,535 $24,777,737 $73,473 $73,473 $20,563,008 $24,851 ,210 669.47 669.47 ($217,769 ($83,766 $20,345,239 $24,767,443 $865.45 $1 ,071 .25 S2,762.84 $3,160.21 S1,897.39 $2,088.96 $44,604,310 $48,296,823 $3,692,512 S8,701 ,196 $9,564,451 S809,914 $809,914 S2,005,448 $2,005,448 $11 ,516,558 $12,379,813 $56, 120,868 $60,676,636 $4 555,767 $57,018,967 ($3,657,669 EXHIBIT I A 0.0334 $661,860,897 $6,739,116 $1,773,128,373 I 525,631 I $3,373.331 $213.121  $1 2591 $917,639,068 $30,649,1451 $41,1861 $30,690,331 I 669.471 $30,690,331 I $1,341 .261 $3,373.33 ! $2,032.08i $46,497,592 I ($1 ,799,231) $9,753,8661 $809,9141 $2,005,448 i $12,569,228 I $59,066,8201 $31,116,1931 $57,019,1441  ($2,047,6761 0.0358 $730,702,357 $6,739.116 $1,901 ,969,833 525,631 $3,618.45 $245.12 $1,390 $949,708,069 $33,999,549 $56,981 $34,056,530 669.47 $0 $34,056,530 $1 ,504.06 $3,618.45 $2,1 14.40 $47,876,547 $1,378,955 $10,280 ,201 .18 $809,914 $2,005,448 $13,095,563 $60,972,110 $4,851 ,242 $56,849,653 ($4, 122,457 MFPA CALC. ESTIMATES: ACT 34 FOR 96-97 97-98 \u0026 98-99 ACT34978.WK~ DISTRICT LRSD LRSD LRSD LRSD LINE SCHOOL YEAR 1995-96 ' 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 NO. CHARGE RATE 0.0278 0.0315 0.0334 0.0358 1 WADMDATA 2 REG. 3QADM 22.384.95 22,231 .64 22,839.39 23,133.39 3 SPED WADM  1,700.72 1,700.72 1,700.72 1,700.72 4 VOCWADM  826.68 826.68 826.68 826.68 5 VOCCWADM  77.95 77.95 77.95 77.95 6 G \u0026 TWADM  253.75 253.75 253.75 253.75 7 MAG ADM 8 LOSS FD WADM 533.59 311 .20 0.00 0.00 9 TOT. WADM 25,777.64 25,401.94 25 698.49 25,992.49 10 M-to-M OUT 11 SBER CALCULATIONS 12 STATE FUNDS $963.200,241 $963,200,241 $1 ,056,899,739 $1 ,104,528,360 13 AMOUNT ADDED $0 %1M}tf~t~~  %if-tt{U:t~~ ii.i.i:d:li~J 14 TOTAL ST. $963,200,241 $1 ,056,899,739 $1 ,104,528,360 $1 ,164,528,360 15 AV AMT. $17,015,999,575 $18,376,728,665 $19,816,194,517 $20,410,680,353 16 CHARGE RATE 0.0278 0.0315 0.0334 0.0358 17 TOTAL AV CHG $473,044,788 $578,866,953 $661 ,860,897 $730,702,357 18 TOTAL MISC. FOS. $5,215,335 $5,171 ,702 $6,739,116 $6,739,116 19 TOTAL RESOURSES $1,441,460,364 $1,640,938,394 $1 ,773,128,373 $1 ,901,969,833 20 TOT. WADM 173,892) * 521,731 519,249 525,631 525,631 21 SBER $2,762.84 $3,160.21 $3,373.33 $3,618.45 22 DIFFERENCE $397.37 $213.12 $245.12  23 AVE. LOC. RES. $907 $1115 $1 ,259 $1,390 24 MFPA CALCULATION 25 TOTAL A. V. $1 ,645,039,791 $1 ,712,31 1,220 $1,947,375,874 $1 ,964,727,647 26 X CHG. $45,732,106 $53,937,803 $65,042,354 $70,337,250 31 MISC. REV. 75% $102,1 58 $1 47,194 $132,386 32 LOCAL RES. $45,834,264 $53,937,803 $65,189,548 $70,469,636 33 NO. M. 0 . 34 M.D. CR. 35 NET LOC. RES. $45,834,264 $53,937,803 $65,189,548 $70,469,636 36 LOG. RES. RATE $1,778.06 $2,123.37 $2,536.71 $2,7 11 .15 37 SBER $2,762.84 $3,160.21 $3,373.33 $3,6 18.45 38 TABLE RATE $984.78 $1 ,036.84 $836.63 $907.301 39 TOT.MFPA $25,385,218 $26,337,719 $21,500,007 $23,582,898 40 MFPACHANGE $952,502 ($4,837,713 $2,082,891 41 ADDITIONAL FUNDING 42 TEACHER RET. \u0026 HEAL TH INS. COST $11 ,518,589.00 $13,802,736.00 $14,461 ,942.00 $15,933,618.50 43 AT RISK  $1 ,226,252.00 $1 ,226,252.00 $1 ,226,252.00 $1 ,226,252.00 44 TRANS  $1 ,653,753.00 $1 ,653,753.00 $1 ,653,753.00 $1 ,653,753.00 45 TOT. ADD. STATE FUNDS $14,398,594 $16,682,741 $17,341,947 $18,813,624 46 TOT. STATE FUNDS $39,783,812 $43,020,460 $38,841,954 $42,396,521 47 TOTAL CHANGE $3 236,649 $38,841,954 $2,612,709 48 ACT 917 FUNDING + DEBT SERV. $43,350,510 $43,233,081 $45,946,383 49 TOTAL MORE OR (LESS) THAN ACT 34 $330,050 $4 391,127 $3,549,862  NUMBERS REMAIN AT 1995-96 LEVELS -  CHG. INC= (AMT. ADD./2500000)/1000 - - ----- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 93 ~Fp _ o P\"' S WESTERN DIVISION .. - '-' 1  06 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. RECElllED DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. OFFICE-fr !ffSEGREGATION MONITORlNm INTERVENORS PCSSD'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS REGARDS MFPA In its latest decision regarding the Districts' financial claims against the State, the Court of Appeals held in part that: [t)he districts are entitled to be held harmless against any adverse effect of the funding change. This means that it will be up to the District Court, after appropriate submissions from the parties, to calculate, as near as may be, the difference between what the old system - MFPA plus teacher retirement plus health insurance - would have produced, and what the new system - Equalization Funding in one lump sum - is producing. 97-1794 E.A. Slip Opinion at p. 31 . The PCSSD has previously acquainted this Court with the negative impact Act 917 had and is having upon the PCSSD. Indeed, in its Order dated February 18, 1997 this Court stated: The Court finds persuasive the figures submitted by the PCSSD which show that its total State funding in 1996-97 will be less under the new formula than it would have been under the old. See PCSSD MFPA Calculation Estimate with Act 34 of 1996-97, Ex. A, PCSSD Prehearing Brief (doc. #2854). In response to the State's figures that indicate that the PCSSD does better under the new formula, _ see Green Deel., State's Resp. to M. Summ. J., the PCSSD points out that the State's figures are not adjusted for the increases in teacher retirement and health insurance costs that the PCSSD is experiencing this year and instead rely on data from the previous school year. Exhibit A to the Motion is an updated calculation utilizing the same methodology reviewed and approved by this Court on February 18, 1997. The outcomes for 1996-97 are slightly different because additional updated information has been received. As contemplated by the Court of Appeals in its most recent decision, these calculations cannot be made with precision, but they are more reliable than \"a reasonable and informed estimate.\" kl The outcome in this case is that as compared to Act 34, Act 917 cost the PCSSD three million, six hundred and fifty-seven thou,sand, six hundred and sixty-nine dollars ($3,657,669) in 1996-97, two million, forty-seven thousand, six hundred and seventy-six dollars ($2 ,047,676) in 1997-98 and will cost the District four million, one hundred and - twenty-two thousand, four hundred and fifty-seven dollars ($4,122,457) during 1998-99 using the current projections of the Arkansas Department of Education. The same methodology demonstrates that for 1996-97 the North Little Rock School District lost one million, five hundred and thirty-four thousand, five hundred and fifty-seven dollars ($1,534,557) under Act 917, that it gained slightly at forty-three thousand, fifty-one dollars ($43 ,051) in the last school year under Act 917 but that it will lose an additional one million, three hundred and forty-four thousand, eight hundred and fifty dollars ($1,344,850) this year under Act 917. The same methodology demonstrates that for 1996-97 the LRSD gained three hundred and thirty thousand and fifty dollars ($330,050) under Act 917, gained four million, three hundred ninety-one thousand, one hundred and twenty-seven dollars - (4,391 ,127) last year under Act 917 and will gain three million, five hundred and forty- 53101 2 ' nine thousand, eight hundred and fifty-two dollars ($3,549,852) this year utilizing current State projections. The Court of Appeals ordered that: \"the three Pulaski County districts should be placed in a position no worse than they would have occupied if the previous system of funding for teacher retirement and health insurance had not been changed.\" ~ at 30- 31 . The system that changed the distribution for teacher retirement and health insurance is Act 917. To comply with the holdings of the Court of Appeals, the PCSSD should be awarded the sums set forth in Exhibit A to its Motion. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371 -0808 60) nty Special School CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September _i, 1998 a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, PA 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 53 101 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell Law Firm  401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 3 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 53101 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 4 ,,,, J.-1\\C K, lLYON \u0026 J O'.~ES, P ... -1\\ . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3400 TCBY TOWER 425 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 7 2201 3472 (501 ) 375 1 1 22 TELECOPI ER (501 ) 375 1 027 ~,-~/ \"~ ,, .. (.It:. lii: Ur f\u0026GREW'!ON MONiTORING Christopher J. Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John M. Walker, Esquire JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, et al September 11 , 1998 Ann Brown OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard W. Roachell, Esq. ROACHELL AND STREETT First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Timothy G. Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center St., Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Nashville Office 111 MUSIC Circle South Surte 202 Nashville. Tennessee 37203 (6151259-4664 Telecopier (615) 259-4668 Enclosed please find North Little Rock School District's Petition for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs as to State Defendant. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, (-- i ~ Stephen W. Jones U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARK ANSllc: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 11 1998 WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By: ________ _ nEP.CLERI\u003c LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF VS. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. SEP 1 ~~ 1998 OFF/GE Cf DEISafGATION MONIT'JR/NG DEFENDAt-v.IS LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT; et al. INIERVENORS INIERVENORS NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S PETITION FOR AW ARD OF. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AS TO STATE DEFENDANT Comes now the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\"), by and through its attorneys, Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A., and for its Petition for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs as to State Defendant, states as follows : 1. On or about July 1, 1998, this Court issued an Opinion affirming the district court's decision that the State of Arkansas had violated the terms of its Settlement Agr~ement with the three Pulaski County school districts with respect to the adverse effect on teacher retirement and health insurance caused by changes to the method of school funding. 2. Consistent with this Court's previous decision in this matter, see 127 F.3d 693 , 695 (8 th Cir. 1997), NLRSD qualifies as a prevailing party and is entitled to recover attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C.  1988. Alternatively, NLRSD is entitled to recover fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann.  16-22-308. 3. NLRSD incurred fees and costs in the amount of $31,081.15 (Stephen W. Jones - 130.25 hours x $185.00 = $24,096.25;]. Allen Carney- 24.50 hours x $125.00 = $3 ,062.50; Melissa Glover - 23 .5 x $115.00 = $2,702.50; and $1 ,219.90 in costs). The hourly fees charged by Jack, Lyon and Jones, P.A. are consistent with those charged by attorneys of like skill and experience in Pulaski County, Arkansas. 4. The fees and costs are supported by the attached Affidavit of Stephen W. Jones, attorney ofNLRSD. See Exhibit A. 5. As a service to the NLRSD and the community at large, the fees charged by Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. to NLRSD were at substantial discounts from those rates typically charged to other clients. See attachedExhibit B, Affidavit of James Smith. However, Defendant ADE is not entitled to benefit from those discounts. To do so would reward it for its violation of the Settlement Agreement. Therefore, for purposes of this fee petition, Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. is entitled to receive its typical hourly fees. WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, NLRSD respectfully requests this Court award it attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $31,081.15, and for all other ~elief to which it may be entitled. By: 2 Respectfully submitted JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 375-1122 Stephen W. Jones, ' 083 J. Allen Carney, #9. 122 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 11 th day of September, 1998 served one copy of the foregoing via United States mail to the following: Christopher J. Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDqE \u0026 CLARK, 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue 2200 Worthen Bank Builcti.m r ~ Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John M. Walker, Esquire JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas .72206 3 Ann Brown OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard W. Roachell, Esq. ROACHELL AND STREETT First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Timothy G. Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center St., Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 $L\u003c-W~ Stephen W. Jones U IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTER.~ DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT,.et al. AFFIDAVIT I, Stephen W. Jones, after being duly sworn, state under oath: PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INilRVE~-ORS INilRVEJ\\-ORS 1. The billing statements attached as Exhibit A to this Affidavit reflect the hours worked and costs incurred on this matter before this Court as recorded in contemporaneous time records. All of the time shown on these billing statements have been billed to NLRSD and those bills have been paid or will be paid. 2. I have been engaged in the private practice of law for twenty (20) years and am the managing partner of Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. I have practiced and lectured extensively in the areas of civil rights, employment, and school law. I am a contributing author to Employment Discrimination Law, Schlei and Grossman, 2Ed., 1983, co-editor of the Arkansas Employment Law Bulletin, and co-author of the Arkansas Employment Law Deskbook. My normal hourly billing rate is $185.00. That rate is consistent with rates charged by lawyers of similar experience and ability in Pulaski County, Arkansas. EXHIBIT I A 3. J. Allen Camey is an associate with Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. with approximately four ( 4) years of experience. His normal hourly billing rate is $125 .00. This rate is consistent with billing rates for lawyers of similar ability and experience in Pulaski CoW1ty, Arkansas. 4. Melissa Glover is an !associate with Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. with approximately two (2) years of experience. Her normal hourly billing rate is $115.00. This rate is consistent with billing rates for lawyers of similar ability and experience in Pulaski County, Arkansas. 5. The attached billing statements relate exclusively to proceedings before this Court involving the funding of teacher retirement and health insurance benefits. Moreover, the time entries have been reviewed to eli!I}inate duplicative and other non-billable time. Designated for internal accoW1ting purposes as matter No. 1-2 0, time records with respe~t-to proceedings before this Coun were kept separate from other desegregation matters. ~ . ' -- '(I STATE OF ARKANSAS) ) ss. COUNTY OF PULASKI) By: x~ LJ ?FJ~ Stephen W. Jones U ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this the l f tiJ d~y of September, 1998, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen W. Jones, known to me to be the p~rson whose name is subscribed to the attestation and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purpose therein contained. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. r-, \\- -~~-\\-'! ::.\\ cQ-Jt. K 0 Notary Public 2 DATE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION Tl~IE 10/20/95 JAC Conference with Mr. Jones regarding State Funding 0.50 issues, recovery of payment shortfalls, etc. 10/20/95 SWJ Meeting with Messrs. Smith, K.ince and Watkins to 5.75 review financial projections and analyze legal rami~cations; Telephone conference with Mr. Jones and Dr. Stewart 11/8/95 JAC Conference with Mr. Jones regarding state funding 0.75 issues and his previous meetings with NL RSD officials 11 /9/95 JAC Conference regarding state funding; review 0.50 Desegregation Plan provisions 11 /14/95 JAC .. Conference regarding teacher retirement and state 1.00 funding 12/ 1/95 JAC Conference regarding funding formula and potential 0 .. 25 litigation 12/11/95 SWJ Telephone conference with l'v1r. Smith regarding 0.75 .. ADE response to funding concerns; Telephone conference with Ms. Boyter .. 1/2/96 SWJ Meeting with Mr. Smith and Dr. New, etc. regarding 2.75 funding issues 1/26/96 SWJ Telephone conference -with Mr. Smith regarding state 0\".75 funding and plan, etc. 2/7/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Smith regarding 2.75 funding issues; Research regarding same and possibility of recovery 2/8/96 SWJ Review ADE's pleadings regarding Worker's 3.25 Compensation to determine if any admission; Research regarding funding issues 2/12/96 JAC Conference regarding potential action against state 0.50 2/13/96 JAC Attend meeting regarding state funding issues 2.50 2/13/96 SWJ Meeting with Mr. Smith and staff regarding funding 4.25 issues; Review current analysis .. \" . . 4/24/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Smith regarding 0.50 PCSSD and ADE meeting 4/29/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Smith regarding 0.50 meeting with ADE; Telephone conference with tvlr. Jones' secretary regarding ADE meeting 5/2/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Smith regarding 0.50 meeting with ADE 5/16/96 SWJ Meeti,ng '.vith ADE regarding funding issues; Meet 5.25 with Messrs. Smith and Kince, et al. 5/ 17/96 JAC Interoffice conference with tvlr. Jones regarding ' 1.00 funding meeting 5/17/96 SWJ Prepare and attend meeting with ADE and district 7.50 personnel regarding funding issues; Meet with Messrs. Smith, et al.; Review various reports 5/23/96 SWJ .. Review ADE offer regarding M-toM adjustment for 0.50 1996 5/24/96 SWJ Telepho~e conference with Mr. Sam Jones regarding 0.75 issues and ADE position 5/28/96 SWJ Review PCS SD letter regarding 1996 M-toM 0.75 adjustments; Review tvlr. Jones' letter regarding hearing on June 7 5/29/96 SWJ Review PCSSD Motion to Enforce Settlement; 0.75 Review letter from tvlr. Walker regarding deposit~ons; Review PCS SD FOI request 5/30/96 JAC Conference regarding meeting with Judge Wright; 1.00 Litigation strategy 5/31 /96 JAC Prepare for and attend hearing regarding State 2.00 funding issues; Conference with Messrs. Jones and Heller. 5/31/96 SWJ Conference with Judge Wright and other counsel 3.50 regarding schedule of proceedings for Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement; Conferences with Messrs. Heller, Jones, Smith and Watkins regarding same; Review ADE FOI request to PCS SD; Review Order regarding funding hearing; Review LRSD, PCSSD Petition for rehearing 6/4/96 JAC Review.County's Motion to Enforce Settlement 1.25 ... Agreement 6/5/96 JAC Review County's Motion; Research funding issues 1.50 6/6/96 JAC Review 8th Circuit Slip Opinion; Review LRSD 1.25 6/6/96 SWJ Review LRSD Motion to Enforce Settlement 3.75 Agreement; Review PCSSD Second Motion to Enforce; Work on NLRSD Motion 617196 JAC Rese' arch and draft NLRSD's Motion to Enforce 3.50 Settlement Agreement 617/96 SWJ Review PCSSD and LRSD Motions; Review and edit 3.25 NLRSD Motion Brief; Telephone conference with Mr. Smith 6/12/96 SWJ Telephone conference regarding NLRSD motion; 0.75 Prepare letter regarding same 6/17/96 SWJ . . Review ADE response to petition for rehearing 0.75 6/27/96 SWJ Review letter from ADE rega~ding extension to 0.25 respond 6/28/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Messrs. Jones and Heller 2.75 regarding amicus and other issues; Review ADE Motion for Extension to Respond; Review status report materials 7/1 /96 SWJ Review Motion to Extend Time filed by Joshua, 1.00 PCSSD and LRSD; Review 1:,RSD June planning and budgeting tool 7/2/96 SWJ . Telephone conference with Mr. Heller regarding 0.50 need for amicus and demand status of rehearing 7/3/96 SWJ Review discovery requests and ADE pleadings 0.75 7/8/96 SWJ Review letter from ADE describing documents 1.00 responsive to PCSSD discovery 7/15/96 SWJ Review documents in preparation for Lakeview 0.75 hearing 7/ 16/96 JAC Conference regarding state funding issues 0.50 7/16/96 SWJ Attend status conference on Lakeview case; 2.00 Conference with Mr. Wilson 7/17/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Sam Jones regarding 0.50 meeting on Lakeview; Telephone conference \\.vi th tvlr. Smith 7/ 18/96 JAC Prepare for and attend meeting with Messrs. Jones, 2.50 Heller, etc. regarding state funding challenge 7/1 8/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Wooldridge 4.50 regarding Mr. Smith's schedule; Telephone conference with Mr. Sam Jones regarding going ahead with meeting; Telephone conference with Mr. Kince; Telephone conference with Ms. Wooldridge; Telephone conference with Mr. Watkins; Attend meeting with other counsel and parties regarding Lakeview 7/23/96 SWJ Telephone conference with l\\llr. Sam Jones 0.50 . 7/24/96 SWJ Briefly review ADE and Lakeview Plaintiffs 1.00 Motions and Responses; Telephone conference with Mr. Sam Jones regarding same; Telephone conference with Mr: Roachell regarding same 7/26/96 JAC Conference with Mr. Jones; review brief 1.00 .. 7/26/96 SWJ Conference with Mr. Carney, review brief 1.00 8/2/96 SWJ Review ADE request for extension 0.25 8/21/96 SWJ Review accumulated PCS SD and intervener's 2.50 pleadings 8/23/96 SWJ Review ADE Motion to Dismiss and Intervener 1.25 Motion; Review PCSSD response; Interoffice conference regarding response; Review and edit same 8/25/96 SWJ Review Motions/Memorandum; telephone 1.00 conference with Mr. Smith 8/29/96 SWJ Review Intervener's reply to LRSD and PCSSD 1.50 response 9/3/96 SWJ Review ADE pleadings 0.50 9/6/96 JLJ Copy Charges 1.50 9/6/96 .. . JLJ Telecopy Charges .. 1.75  , 9/ 10/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Smith regarding class 1.00 certification motion in Lakeview case; Telephone conference with Mr. Heller regarding LRSD position on motion 9/26/96 JLJ Copy Charges 4.25 10/3/96 SWJ Meet with Messrs. Smith, Jones, Heller, Kincl, Lester 2.75 and Stewart regarding strategy in Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement against ADE; Conference with Messrs. Smith and Kincl regarding same 10/8/96 MBG . Telephone conference with Mr. Hoskins at 0.50 Department of Education about depositions; Conference with Mr. Jones and Mr. Bowman about depositions 10/9/96 MBG .. Telephone conference with Mr. Hoskins at 6.00 Department of Education; Review ofletters for file; Prepare deposition list; Conference with Mr. Jones  on facts of case; Organize file; Attend deposition of . Dr. Robert Shaver 10/10/96 MBG Attend Dr. Robert Shaver's deposition; Conference 9.00  --with Mr. Jones on issues in depositions 10/11/96 MBG Attend depositions of Tristan Greene and Dr. Bobbie 8.00 Davis 10/14/96 JLJ  Parking Charge 17.40 11/11 /96 SWJ Review and comment on draft of pretrial brief of the 2.00 three Pulaski districts regarding loss of teachers retirement and employee health insurance payments from state; Telephone conferences with Messrs. Heller and S. Jones regarding brief and preparation for hearing on November 19 11 /13/96 SWJ Review order from Judge Wright ordering status 1.75 conference to consider various motions regarding motion to enforce settlement agreement; Reivew PCSSD motion to enlarge Jacksonville North and South; Telephone conferences with other counsel regarding hearing and strategy 11/18/96 SWJ Review new motions to enforce settlement agreement 6.00 and ADE responses; Telephone conference with :vfr. Smith regarding hearing; Telephone conference with Messrs. Heller and S. Jones regarding November 19 hearing; Review original motions to enforce settlement agreement against ADE prepare for status conference with Judge Wright; Review pre-trial brief;  ! Review PCSSD pre-trial brief 11 /21/96 SWJ Review draft of Motion for Summary Judgment, 1.50 Briefin Support and Statement of Undisputed Facts; Telephone conference with Mr. Heller regarding same; Review letter from Mr. Walker regarding request for fees for November 19 hearing 11/25/96 SWJ Review filed version of Districts ' Motion for 1.75 .. Summary Judgment against ADE, Brief in Support and Statement of Undisputed Facts; Review letter from ADE attorney requested e~tension to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment on teacher retirement issue 12/13/96 SWJ Review ADE pleadings; Telephone conferences 2.25 regarding depositions needed and schedule for sa.rne 12/18/96 SWJ Review ADE pleadings; Telephone conference with 1.50 other counsel regarding analysis and suggestions 12/19/96 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr: Heller regarding 0.50 additional filings 12/23/96 SWJ Review ADE response to LRSD, NLRSD and 2.75 PCSSD Statement of Undisputed Facts, ADE opposition to ODM budget, arid Brief in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 12/26/96 SWJ Review Districts ' reply to ADE Response to Motion 1.25 for Summary Judgment; Review Amicus Curiae Response on Summary Judgment; Review deposition schedule for Mr. Wilhoit and Dr. Sydoriak 1/2/97 SWJ Prepare for and attend deposition of Mr. Wilhoit; 3.75 Telephone conference with Mr. Heller regarding hearing 1/3/97 SWJ Review documents related to school funding issues; 2.50 Interoffice conference with other counsel regarding hearing and evidence needed 1/6/97 SWJ Telephone conference with Mr. Reed regarding 3.25 impact of Act 917 on special education funding; Research regarding Act 91 7; Prepare for and attend deposition of Diane Sydoriak 1/6/97 SWJ Conferences with Messrs. Heller and Jones regarding 1.25 preparation for hearing 1/13/97 SWJ Review ADE and Districts' pleadings; Review 2.00 amicus filed by Mr. Llewelyn 1/14/97 SWJ Review and organize files with paralegal 1.25 1/14/97 SWJ . . Review motion and brief regarding summary 1.00 judgment on special education and other issues 1/1 5/97. SWJ Review Districts' motion regarding health insunice , 1.75 special educ "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1699","title":"Court filings: District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998-09-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School integration","School enrollment","School improvement programs","School facilities","School employees","Students","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1699"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["79 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  EDWARD L . WRIGHT (1903 - 1977) ROBERTS . LINDSEY (1913 - 1991) ISAAC A. SCOTT , JR. JOHN G. LILf GORDON S. RATHER , JR . TERRY L. MATHEWS DAVID M. POWELL ROGER A. GLASGOW C. DOUGLAS BUFORD , JR. PATRICK J . GOSS ALSTON JENNINGS, JR. JOHN R. TISDALE KATHLYN GRAVES M. SAMUEL JONES Ill JOHN WILLIAM SPIVEY Ill LEE J. MULDROW N.M. NORTON EDGAR J. TYLER CHARLES C. PRICE WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 2200 RECEBl\\'J~CK, ARKANSAS 72201-3699 . ~ ~ ~u (501) 371-0808 FAX (501) 376-9442 SEP 2 1998 WEBSITE : www.wlj .com ;::~;E/ ~L.5~i!MAN OFFICE OF OF COUNSEL ~~:~~E\\ t0 ~l~c~ .. ~:RGER DESEGREGAJION MONITORINGA~1TNOA~~:tNJ~~s SAMMYE L. TAYLOR M. TOCO WOOD WALTER E . MAY GREGORY T . JONES H. KEITH MORRISON BETTINA E . BROWNSTEIN WALTER McSPAOOEN ROGER 0 . ROWE Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., ~e. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Writer's Direct Olal No . 501-2121273 mjones@wlj .com September 1, 1998 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ., NANCY BELLHOUSE MAY JOHN 0 . DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS HENRY KIMBERLY WOOD TUCKER RAY F. COX. JR. HARRY S . HURST, JR. TROY A. PRICE PATRICIA A. SIEVERS JAMES M. MOODY. JR . KATHRYN A PRYOR J . MARK DAVIS CLAIRE SHOWS HANCOCK KEVIN W. KENNEDY JERRY J . SALLINGS FRED M. PERKINS Ill WILLIAM STUART JACKSON MICHAEL 0 . SARNES STEPHEN R. LANCASTER JUDY ROBINSON WILBER BETSY MEACHAM AINSLEY H. LANG KYLE R. WILSON C. TAO BOHANNON DONS. McKINNEY MICHELE SIMMONS AL LGOOD KRISTI M. MOODY J . CHARLES DOUGHERTY M. SEAN HATCH PHYLLIS M. McKENZIE ELISA MASTERSON WHITE JANE M. FAULKNER ROBERT W. GEORGE J . ANDREW VINES Re: Little Rock School Distrie:t v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. USDC Docket No.: LR-C-82-866 Dear Counsel: Enclosed is The PCSSD's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law which was filed today with the Court Clerk. Cordially yours, WRIG T, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP muelJ~/ckJ Enclosure IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. RECEIVED PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS SEP 2 1998 KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS OFFICE OF - DESEGREGATION MONITORING THE PCSSD'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BACKGROUND This action was filed on November 30, 1982 by the LRSD against the PCSSD and others.1 Liability was adjudicated against the PCSSD and others on April 10, 1984 and a consolidation of the three school districts in Pulaski County was ordered. Upon appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (hereafter the Court of Appeals), en bane, affirmed most of the findings of liability of the District Court, but reversed the court ordered consolidation and prescribed a different remedy. The Court of Appeals ordered that the boundaries of the LRSD would become those of the city of Little Rock as they then existed. The Court of Appeals also ordered the transfer of the Granite Mountain community from the LRSD to the PCSSD. As a result of these transfers, the PCSSD lost 36% of its tax base, one-third of its schools, and 25% of its students. 1 The LRSD supports the PCSSD in its petition for unitary status. 1 In the same opinion, the Court of f,ppeals ordered all three districts to develop desegregation plans that would distribute students in a way such that each school would have approximately the same racial balance as each district had as a whole. Significantly, the Court of Appeals specifically held that the remedy it then ordered was a complete remedy for the constitutional violations of which the PCSSD had been found guilty; specifically those violations relating to annexations and deannexations, segregated housing, school siting, student assignments, special education, transportation, employment of faculty and administrators, and black participation in school affairs. Thereafter, other proceedings occurred,_ both before the District Court and the _,., Court of Appeals, culminating in 1989 in the Settlement Agreement and the agreed upon Desegregation Plan for each school district. While the present PCSSD Plan was not finalized in all of its particulars until April, 1992, the PCSSD has operated since 1989 under substantially the same plan. It is significant to note that many features of the PCSSD Plan, the lnterdistrict Plan, and the Plans of the other school districts were not specifically mandated as remedial devices by the Court of Appeals. For instance, the six interdistrict schools, while subsequently embraced by the Court of Appeals, were never mandated as part of any prescribed remedy. For that matter, the Court of Appeals never specifically mandated that the PCSSD pursue affirmative action in hiring and in staffing its schools and other operations. Indeed, it held in 1985 that the territorial transfer was the remedy for, among other things, violations in the areas of special education, transportation, and 51781 2 employment of faculty and administrators,. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 778 F.2d 404, 434-435 (8th Cir. 1985). Counseling. The PCSSD was released from federal court supervision as regards counseling and guidance programs by order dated March 27, 1996 (Docket #2648). INTRODUCTION 1. The Release of All Claims Against the PCSSD provides: \"In consideration of commitments set forth in the Plans, Joshua forever .discharge[s] the PCSSD of and from any and all actions, causes of action, claims and demands which in any way relate to racial discrimination, segregation in public education, or to violations of other constitutional or statutory rights of school children, based on race or color. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the Court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the Plans.\" [Court Exhibit No. CX 417, Pages 1 and 2 of Release of All Claims Against the PCSSD.] 2. The District Court withdrew its monitoring and supervision of the North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) in the area of student assignments in an Order dated September 18, 1995. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 1.] Since 1989, there have been no allegations of new constitutional violations made against the PCSSD. (UHi 20) 3. The plan has had a marked impact in the way the PCSSD does business with regard to the way it looks at test scores and analyzes that data with regard to the way that kids are placed or not placed. It has impacted the way the PCSSD delivers staff development and its goals in its search for instructional strategies that it hopes would either mediate the affects of the problems that come associated with 51781 3 socioeconomic status, in particular in the.,PCSSD as in others the black population is 9 more heavily impacted because as a group, its income level is poorer. A search for strategies to try to remove any disparity that exists and that would at the same time advance achievement as a whole has had a dramatic impact on the way the PCSSD does business. [Court Exhibit No. CX 439, Pages 8 and 9.] 4. The PCSSD foresees no significant change as to its commitments concerning the interdistrict and magnet schools. [Court Exhibit No. CX 438, Page 22.] 5.  Mr. Bill Bowles, the PCSSD Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation is an African American who has been employed by the District for 28 years. He has served as a teacher, assistant principal, principal and central office administrator. (UHi 23) He was able to assess from whence the Distrl~t started to today and thinks the District has made a lot of progress. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Pages 15 and 16.] 6. Mr. Bowles has been Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation for 13 years.. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Page 4.] 7. Mr. Bowles has been involved with the current desegregation plan from its inception and it is his opinion that the PCSSD has fully implemented its desegregation plan and implemented it in good faith. (UHi 24, 92-93) He further believes that the PCSSD has earned unitary status. 19.:. 8. Some of his job responsibilities are to coordinate the implementation of the District's desegregation plan. He is a liaison person to all other departments for the District's desegregation plan, and is a consultant with each assistant superintendent for the implementation of the desegregation plan. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Page 5:] 51781 4 9. Mr. Bowles consulted with the superintendent and their attorney, Mr. Sam - Jones; and looked at other cases throughout the country. They did some comparative analysis on those cases and this one, considered the fact that they felt their implementation was in good faith and to the point where they felt that they had implemented it with a commitment and to the point where they felt they had done practically all that was required of them. After that consultation, Mr. Lester issued a memo to the other department heads to look at their individual divisions. Each department head felt his department had in good faith implemented the plan as it was written so the go ahead to actually file for un.itary status was given. [Court Exhibit No. ex 441, Pages 8 and 9.] 10. Mr. Jones, Mr. Bowles and the superintendent met individually with each interested board member to explain what they were pursuing. Only one of the African-American board members expressed some concerns. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Page 9.] 11. Mr. Bowles believes federal court jurisdiction has been a good thing for the school District because it has opened some eyes, it has opened the book so-to-speak for everybody to look at and make changes that were obviously necessary within the District. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Pages 18 and 19.] 12. Each month Mr. Bowles looks at the school board agenda and if there is a problem on the school board agenda that might negatively impact desegregation, he is required to submit in writing what that problem is. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Page 20.] 13. In Mr. Bowles' opinion, unitary is not based on the end result. It's based on effort and implementation. [Court Exhibit No. CX 441, Page 60.] 51781 5 14. This court has never been r~quired to order the PCSSD to implement something from its plan that it had failed to implement. 15. The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation has time reserved at each Board meeting to report whether or not there is anything on the Board agenda that might negatively impact the desegregation plan. (UHII 406) 16. If that Assistant Superintendent feels there is anything on the tentative agenda which has a negative impact on the desegregation plan, it is removed from the agenda. (UHII 407) 17. While Joshua also has time reserved on each board agenda, it is hardly ever used . .!.Q.,_ 18. There has not been a single incident during the history of this case in which Joshua has initiated, pursed and filed a proposed amendment to the PCSSD plan. (UHi 413) STUDENT ASSIGNMENT 1. Or. Armor advocates a racial balance range of 20 percentage points. For example, if a school district were 65% black, the range would be between 45% and 85% black. (Armor 64) 2. Whatever the range, some schools are going to fall outside of the range because the districts, even if they assign appropriately, could not control who shows up from year to year. Such a failing is not a measure of the intent or of the plan. (Armor 65-66) 3. Even districts that have been declared unitary have some schools that vary from the standard, many times by just a few percentage points. There are schools 51781 6 - - - -- - - ------ - ------------------- in many school districts that for a variety 9f reasons cannot be integrated according to the applicable standard because of geography or distance or hazards or isolation. (Armor 66) 4. For instances, in Savannah, 11 of 44 schools were outside the range of 20 percentage points, yet Dr. Armor testified, and the District Court agreed, that Savannah was unitary with respect to student assignment. (Armor 69-70) 5. At the time the PCSSD was 20% minority, application of its current student assignment test would have permitted a variance of only 5 percentage points in either direction, and is one of the narrowest variances in the history of school desecration. (Armor 86) 6. Dr. Armor did not know of a single school district in the country operating with the narrow rage utilized by the PCSSD in the decade of the 1990s. (Armor 87) 7. Savannah was declared unitary even while it still had three schools that were 80% black and one that was only 31 % black. (Armor 89-90, Ex. 395) 8. Savannah, like the PCSSD, is a geographically very large school district ; and it was difficult to 'disperse students to some of the remoter schools. (Armor 90-91) 9. In the Wilmington case, Dr. Armor testified that the Wilmington schools were racially balanced because in any given year 80% of the schools would be within the court prescribed range. That view was adopted by the court. The Wilmington range is slightly more expansive than the PCSSD range. (Armor 95) 10. The same percentage for the Savannah schools was approximately 75%. (Armor 96) 51781 7 11 . Dr. Armor explained that there would probably be no unitary decision whatsoever if every school had to meet a standard, whatever that standard was, every year or most years. (Armor 105) 12. Dr. Armor says it is virtually impossible to recruit white students to schools that are 90% African-American through an m-m program. (Armor 202-203) 13. Savannah had 11 court ordered magnet schools in 1990 and the district added to that total. (Armor 211) 14. For 1990, Savannah had a target to recruit 1,025 students to the magnets and they were able to recruit 950. (Armor 212) 15. Or. Armor described this as being_ the most successful magnet program in the country. (Armor 213) 16. Dr. Armor determined that out of all of the schools in Pulaski County, that - is, all three districts, only two schools were outside of his racial balance standard, and those two only by a few percentage points. (Armor 219) 17. Dr. Armo.r does not think it is fair in a national sense to have districts subject to widely different concepts of racial balance. He tries to bring a single standard to bear on all cases. (Armor 221) 18. Under Dr. Armor's test, a test accepted by the Wilmington, Savannah, and other courts, the PCSSD is unitary as to racial balance. 19. Pursuant to the racial balance tests applicable pursuant to the Joshua Agreement, as endorsed by the Court of Appeals, the PCSSD schools could range from 20 percent black to approximately 67 percent black, the latter being the black student 51781 8 population which has largely pertained frqm year to year in the LRSD. Pursuant to this test, only Lawson Elementary School remains consistently outside this range. 20. Under the test articulated originally by the en bane court in 1985, the schools in the PCSSD could range plus or minus 25 percent from the then prevailing percentage of either race. For instance, last year at the elementary level the PCSSD was 67 percent other. Twenty-five percent of 67 percent is 17 percent. Accordingly, pursuant to this test, the PCSSD schools could legally array from 16 percent black to 50 percent black. Under this Scenario, only the following would have failed to meet the statistical range: Fuller Emergency for the years 1989 through 1995, Bates Elementary for the years 1994 and 1995, Arnold Drive Elen:entary for the year 1991, Lawson Elementary for the years 1990 and 1992, Oak Grove ele\"mentary for the years 1989 and 1990, and 1991, Pine Forest Elementary for the years 1989 and 1990, and Tolleson for - the year 1989. 21. Statistically, the PCSSD has enjoyed racial balance outcomes superior to every other district declared unitary during this decade. It should be released from court supervision as regards student assignment and racial balance. 22. The Office of Desegregation Monitoring issued its 1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts Report on January 30, 1998. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Title Page.] 23. Enrollment information dating back to 1988-89 is included in this report. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 1.] Information reported is current through 1997-98. 24. The PCSSD Desegregation Plan recognizes only two racial designations, black students and white students. The plan includes provisions that set goals for 51781 9 balancing the enrollment of these two ractal groups within each school. Except for - interdistrict schools, which have plan-specified guidelines that are static, these goals are based on the percentage of black students enrolled district-wide by organizational levels. Every year racial balance is assessed for each school based on the District's racial balance at each organizational level for that year. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 2.] 25. The PCSSD Desegregation Plan includes guidelines that set racial balance goals for individual schools. The plan set 20% as the minimum black enrollment for PCSSD schools. The maximum black enrollment at all organizational levels is based on a variance of 25% from the annual percentage of black enrollment at ,/ each of the two organizational levels (elementary and secondary). (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 2.] 26. For the 1997-98 school year, the PCS SD had a districtwide elementary student population that was 33% black. The allowable variance in racial balance is calculated by multiplying that 33% by 25% (.33 X .25 = .0825), then adding the product (rounded to 8%) to the total elementary black proportion of 33% (33% + 8% = 41 %) to establish the maximum black enrollment of 41 % in elementary schools. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 2.] 27. Because the plan-prescribed formula used to calculate the targeted racial balance is tied to the District's black enrollment for that particular year, it is not possible to uniformly compare racial balance compliance from year to year without linking a given year's enrollment to that year's acceptable range. Since the target range for racial balance may vary somewhat from one year to the next as district-wide black 51781 10 enrollment fluctuates, it is possible that, due to a change in the District's overall racial ' - balance, a school that was out of compliance one year could have an identical enrollment the following year and yet be within an acceptable range. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 2.] 28. Although the desegregation plan specifies a minimum black enrollment for PCSSD schools, certain provisions of an agreement among the parties (called the Joshua Agreement) can raise the PCSSD minimum and potentially alter the maximum as well. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 3.] 29. The 1997-98 elementary enrollment of 10,832 is the lowest number recorded for the PCSSD in ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 30. Between 1996-97 and 1997-98, the PCSSD has lost 445 (4%) of its elementary students. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 31. Some of the decrease in elementary enrollment that occurred between 1996-97 and 1997-98 was due to the District's reorganization of the Jacksonville junior highs. Jacksonville Junior High South (which previously held grades 7-9) was reconfigured to house grades 8 and 9; Jacksonville Junior High North (which also previously held grades 7-9) was renamed Jacksonville Middle School and began serving grades 6 and 7. Sixth graders were moved from Adkins, Bayou Meto, Dupree, Harris, Jacksonville Elementary, Pinewood, and Taylor to Jacksonville Middle School. This movement resulted in a population shift from the elementary level to the secondary level because some sixth graders, who had previously been counted as elementary students, were counted as secondary students beginning in 1997-98. According to the District, Jacksonville Middle School had 351 sixth graders in 1997-98. Calculations 51781 11 show that the 351 students that were mayed out of the elementary school category for 1997-98 account for 79% of the 445- student decline in elementary population from the previous year. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 32. The number of black elementary students has declined by 72 (2%). [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 5.] 33. The number of white elementary students has decreased by 373 (5% ). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 34. Between 1996-97 and 1997-98, 16 of the 25 elementary schools experienced a decrease in their total enrollment: Adkins has lost 29 students (9%); Baker 2 (1 %); Bayou Meta 14 (2%); Cato 13 (2%); College Station 34 (11 %); Crystal Hill 29 (4%); Dupree 68 (16%); Harris 27 (9%); Jacksonvill(;-139 (19%); Landmark 42 (8%); Lawson 13 (4%); Pinewood 83 (15%); Scott 10 (8%); Sherwood 35 (8%); Sylvan Hills - 9 (2%); and Tolleson 36 (7%). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 35. At Adkins, Bayou Meta, Dupree, Harris, Jacksonville Elementary, and Pinewood, the enrollment decline was at least partly due to the relocation of sixth ~ graders to Jacksonville Middle School, a change which occurred during the grade-level reorganization that involved those schools for 1997-98. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 5.] 36. Since 1988-89, the District has lost 1,421 (12%) of its elementary students. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 37. Significant losses have occurred at 17 schools: Adkins lost 103 students (27%); Bates 277 (37%); Cato 105 (17%); Dupree 118 (24%); Fuller 217 (36%); Harris 411 (60% ); Jacksonville 207 (26% ); Landmark 165 (26% ); Lawson 75 (21 % ); Oak 51781 12 Grove 124 (22%); Oakbrooke 193 (29%);,Pine Forest 106 (18%); Pinewood 217 (32%); Robinson 71 (15%); Scott 96 (45%); Sherwood 185 (33%); and Sylvan Hills 323 (44%). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 38. Enrollment has risen in four schools since 1988-89: College Station has shown a significant increase of 101 students (54%). The other three schools have much smaller increases: Arnold Drive added 20 students (5%), Baker 10 (3%) and Bayou Meta 16 (3%). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 39. The maximum black percentage at any PCSSD elementary school last year was 41 %. Since the desegregation plan specifies 20% black enrollment as the minimum for all schools, the racial balance ranQe for 1997-98 was 20% to 41 % black. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 40. In 1997-98, ten of the 25 PCSSD elementary schools (including the three - interdistrict schools) have fallen outside the target for racial balance, which is two more than the eight elementary schools that failed to meet the racial balance goals last year. [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 6.] 41 . The enrollment at Baker (an interdistrict school which has a minimum goal of 40% black enrollment) is 21 % black, which is 19 percentage points below the minimum for interdistrict schools. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 42. At 14% black in 1997-98, Lawson has fallen well below the minimum goal of 20% black. Since last year, Lawson has dropped two additional percentage points away from the minimum; since 1994-95 (the one year Lawson was within the range), it has fallen nine percentage points. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 51781 13 43. This year, Pine Forest (whic;h had been with in range the last two years) is - below the minimum guideline. The school has failed to meet the minimum target for black enrollment for six of the last ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 44. Of the seven elementary schools that exceed the maximum range of 41 % black enrollment, four are located in the southeast sector of the PCSSD and three are located north of the Arkansas River. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 45. Although within range last year, College Station, at 43% black, is above the targeted range. The school has been above the maximum range for eight of the last ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 46. Although within range for the last ~ve years, Scott, at 43% black, moved above the targeted range this year. The school has been above the range for four of the last ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 47. Bates, Fuller and Landmark have all been outside the target range for the last ten years. This year, Bates exceeds the target range by 15 percentage points, Fuller by 19 points, and Landmark by 4 points. Since 1996-97, enrollment at each of ~ these schools has moved farther above the target range. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 6.] 48. At 53% black, Harris, which has exceeded the target of black enrollment for the seventh consecutive year, is 12 percentage points above the goal. [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 6.] 49. At 46% black, which is five percentage points above the goal and four points higher than last year, Jacksonville continues to exceed the target range. This is 51781 14 I I I I I I I I I I the third consecutive year that the school 'has missed the target range. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 50. Although above the targeted range last year, Taylor is within the range this year. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 51 . In 1997-98, for the third consecutive year, PCSSD's total secondary enrollment has increased over the previous year. The 1997-98 enrollment of 9,192 has risen by 2%, or 174 students (13 black and 161 white), over the number recorded in 1996-97. [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, P~ge 7.] 52. Some of the increase in secondary enrollment that occurred between 1996-97 and 1997-98 was due to the District's reorganization of the Jacksonville junior highs. Jacksonville Junior High (which previously held grades 7-9) was reconfigured to house grades 8 and 9; Jacksonville Junior High North (which also previously held - grades 7-9) was renamed Jacksonville Middle School and began serving grades 6 and 7. Sixth graders were moved from Adkins, Bayou Meta, Dupree, Harris, Jacksonville Elementary, Pinewooq, and Taylor to Jacksonville Middle School. This movement ; resulted in a population shift from the elementary level to the secondary level because some sixth graders, who had previously been counted as elementary students, were counted as secondary students beginning in 1997-98. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 53. Six of the twelve secondary schools have posted enrollment increases between 1996-97 and 1997-98: Fuller Junior, Jacksonville Middle (previously Jacksonville South), Jacksonville Junior (previously Jacksonville North), Jacksonville High, North Pulaski High, and Robinson Junior. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 51781 15 54. The largest increases occur~ed at Jacksonville Junior (246 students or ' - 4 7%) and at Jacksonville Middle (88 students or 13%) and are due to the reorganization of the Jacksonville junior high schools. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 55. All other increases in student enrollment were much more modest: Fuller Junior High (18 students or 2%); Jacksonville High (1 student); North Pulaski High (34 students or 4%); and Robinson Junior High (24 students or 6%). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 7.] 56. Between 1996-97 and 1997-98, five schools have shown a decrease in overall enrollment: Mills High (-70 or 8%); Northwood Junior high (-87 or 9%); Oak Grove Junior and Senior High (-39 or 4%); Robi!1son High (-16 or 4%); and Sylvan Hills High (-25 or 3% ). [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 8.] 57. The 70-student decline at Mills this year nearly offsets the enrollment gain - of 84 students recorded in 1996-97. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 58. Since 1995-96, Northwood Junior High has lost 152 students (15%). [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 59. The current enrollment of 785 at Sylvan Hills High School is a ten-year low. [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 8.] 60. Between 1988-89 and 1997-98, enrollment has fallen in nine of the twelve secondary schools: Northwood, Robinson, and Sylvan Hills Junior Highs; Oak Grove Junior and Senior High; and Jacksonville, Mills, North Pulaski, Robinson, and Sylvan Hills High Schools. (Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 8.] 61. The 1997-98 enrollment in the Pesso secondary schools is 32% black. Using that figure as the basis for calculations, the maximum black percentage at any 51781 16 PCSSD secondary school this year should be 40%. Since the desegregation plan - specifies 20% as the minimum black enrollment for all schools, the racial balance range for 1997-98 is 20% to 40% black. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 62. Both Fuller Junior High and Mills High have remained above the target range for each of the last ten years. At 44% black, Fuller Junior High is four points beyond the maximum target; and Mills, at 48% black, is eight points beyond the maximum goal. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] . 63. The percentage of black stude~ts attending Fuller Junior High has remained fairly stable during the last ten years, ranging from 43% in 1993-94 to 49% in 1995-96. [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 8.] . 64. The racial balance at Mills High has been constant at 48% black over the last five academic years, although the enrollment has increased by 34% during that -  same time period. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 65. No PCSSD secondary schools have fallen below the minimum of 20% black enrollment durin$J the past seven years. In 1988-89, five secondary schools had student populations that were less than 20% black. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 66. As early as 1988-89 in some schools, the PCSSD began offering specialty programs as a means for promoting voluntary desegregation. Eight schools have offered some type of specialty program, and some schools offer multiple programs. Schools which have (or once had) specialty programs are Bates, College Station, Fuller, and Landmark Elementary Schools; Fuller Junior High School; and Jacksonville, Mills, and Sylvan Hills High Schools. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 51781 17 67. At the end of 1994-95, the P,CSSD discontinued the Math and Science Together (MAST) specialty program it had offered at Bates. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 8.] 68. Six of the eight PCSSD schools that offer (or have offered) specialty programs have experienced a slide in total enrollment since the school began a specialty program. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 69. Between 1990-91 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98, Bates' enrollment has shrunk by 172 students (27%). Bates began experiencing a significant decrease in enrollment in 1992-93 and suffered a 12% decline in 1993-94 and another 12% drop after the school's speci~lty program was discontinued at the close of 1994-95. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 70. Between 1988-89 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98, Fuller Elementary's enrollment has decreased by 217 students (36% ). [Court Exhibit No. ex 418, Page 9.] 71. Landmark's enrollment has declined by 104 students (18%) between ' ; 1990-91 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98. The 1997-98 enrollment is presently the lowest recorded in the last ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 72. Jacksonville High has lost 207 students (17%) between 1988-89 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98. (Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 73. Mills' enrollment has decreased by 19 students (2%) between 1988-89 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98. However, in 1994-95 the District added two more specialty programs and enrollment began to climb. Between 1993-94 51781 18 (the year before the addition of the two specialty programs) and 1997-98, enrollment has increased by 195 students (34%). Nevertheless, the current enrollment of 766 represents a loss of 70 students since last school year. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 74. Enrollment at Sylvan Hills High has decreased by 116 students (13%) between 1991-92 (the year the specialty program began) and 1997-98. The current enrollment of 785 is the lowest number recorded in the past ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 75. Enrollment at College Station was 188 students in 1988-89; however, that number jumped 29% (54 students) when the specialty programs were added in 1989-90. Enrollment continued to increase through 1992-93, and has fluctuated each year since. The current enrollment of 289 is near the average enrollment over the last ten years. [Court Exhibit No. CX 418, Page 9.] 76. With the exceptio "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_972","title":"''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998-07/1999-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School employees","School enrollment","School facilities","School improvement programs","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Gifted persons"],"dcterms_title":["''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/972"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1679","title":"Court filings concerning PCSSD's March 24 plan, ADE project management tool, and ODM ''Secondary School Facilities in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'' report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1998-04"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Joshua Intervenors","Arkansas. Department of Education","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School facilities","School buildings","Education, Secondary","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning PCSSD's March 24 plan, ADE project management tool, and ODM ''Secondary School Facilities in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'' report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1679"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["48 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, motion for enlargement of time; District Court, two orders; District Court, joint motion of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) and Joshua for approval of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) March 24 plan; District Court, memorandum brief in support of joint motion of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) and Joshua for approval of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) plan; District Court, memorandum opinion and order; District Court, two orders; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''Secondary School Facilities in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.   t' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LRC-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. MQJIQN EQB ENLARGEMENT Of IIME PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS On March 24, 1998, this Court ordered PCSSD and Joshua to submit, within ten days, the agreed amendment to the PCSSD Desegregation Plan together with a joint motion, brief in support and proposed notice. The parties desire an enlargement of time to comply with the Court's Order until and including April 9, 1998. WHEREFORE, Joshua and the PCSSD pray for an enlargement of time until and Including April 9, 1998 within which to comply with the Court's directive. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings, LLP 200 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 c00d THEJOSHUAINTERVENORS John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 dll SEIN I NH3.f '8 '.!-.3S@ I 7 'lH':l I ~M \u003e t CERTIFICATE OF EBYICE On April ___(_ ~_, 1998, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail to each of the following: Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026 Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Janes 425 West Capltol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 00d 2 dll S':JN I tlN3f '8 ' X3SCTN I 7 ' lH':J I df~ RECEIVED FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT AP.KANSAS APR 8 1998 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION APR O 71998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING JA~AES ! M~MACK, C~ERK By. ~ ) c}_ ~ D!:P CL.fR.~ ' UTILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT,  Plaintiff,  vs.  No. LR-C-82-866  PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL  DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants,   MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al.,  lntervenors,   KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al.,  Intervenors.  ORDEB. Before the Court is a motion filed by the Pulaski County Special School District  (\"PCSSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") requesting a continuance to and including April 9, 1998 in which to file their agreed proposed Revised PCSSD Desegregation Plan, in addition to a joint motion and brief in support requesting that the Court approve the proposed Revised Plan and a notice regarding the proposed Revised Plan.  This Court grants the parties' request. The PCSSD and Joshua have to and including April 9, 1998 in which to file these documents and pleadings. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7~ day of April 1998. rHIS DOCUMENT ENTER COMP~ce T RuJ~e c:g,0OcRK7er SHEET IN ON  7/ 8 l!Y 7Z1-:: 9(a) FRCP FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT APR 8 199,9 EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OFFICE OF DESE6REGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION APR O 7 1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * JA~ES W. ~~ORMACK, CLERK By.. 'L 'QI ,u D 41 V'-:a DEP CI.ERll Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * ORDER Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a reply filed by Ms. Hafeeza Majeed on April 6, 1998 on - behalf of Toe Fact-Finding Committee for the Little Rock School Desegregation Plan--Is It Working for African-American Youth?\" Ms. Majeed filed this reply in response to Mr. John Walker's letter regarding Ms. Majeed's initial objection to the proposed January 16 Revised LRSD Desegregation Plan. 1 The Clerk is hereby directed to serve the parties involved in this case with copies of this Order and attached Exhibit A. 2 By separate Order, the Court will inform the parties how the   Court will proceed in regard to Ms. Majeed's latest filing. 1 See Docket No. 3130 for a copy of Ms. Majeed's initial objection. See Docket No. 3135 for Mr. Walker's response to Ms. Majeed's objection. 2 The Clerk should also send copies to the following individuals: Mr. Markton Cole Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed 7320 S. Ridgeland Ave. 2A 8505 Holmes, #174. .. Chicago, Illinois 60649 Kansas City, Missouri 64131 ; . i IT IS SO ORDERED TiilS  day of April 1998. fHIS DOCUMENT E1.JTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN ;~~ t'$RULE s:;N~(a) FRCP - . ,, \\. 2 .. ,. . ' . ~:' : \" : April 6, 1998 TO: FROM: ;-;:: ,. :l rr.: --..... U~- -~ - . _ ) ... .'?  :.. . I'~., , . 1. I l I  , _ _ EAs, .:Hr, c:, ie:~ -\u003c, ~.'-: .. ,1r The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -'..' .. l.-f  ' :_;,:s,\\s Federal Judge Eastern District of Arlamsas, Western Di~ U 6 [SJ J/l.~:1:::~ ,., i i~l'.C'R . \" The Fact-Findina Conmiittee for the Little Rock S:choortiisTtfor ,,\\,,.._, /(, CCRK D~H,,-.,-in ftllBl h It w~ Pw MHv1B1Amm,1m Ym;f,91'' THROUGH: Hafeeza B. Majeed, Cbairpenon RE; LITI'LE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Judge Wright: V: LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUN1Y SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOTICE (EXHIBIT C, JANU'ARY 16 REVISED DESEGREGATION PLAN'') The following open letter to Little Rock School District students.parents. and friends. is also a formal request desiring your approval: \"OPEN LETTER JO 11IE UITLI ROCK COMMUNITY\" \"Thank yor/' to the maoy friends and supporters ofThe Fa.rt-Finding Committee with whom I met and enjoyed talkin! to during the weekend. A special iha:nk yor/\u003e to those who supported our efforts with your signatures. AB promised to you, the following request to the Honorable Susan Webber Wright has been submitted in your behalf 1. We, the 1D1dersigned, recognize that we are represented in the Joshua Class, as defined by the attached \"Notice.'' (Exhibit C. LRSD January 16 Revised ..,. . 3. Plan)  We agree that we were provided a copy of the ~otice .. by the Fact-Finding Committee, represented by Ms. HafeezaB. Majeed. We agree, like several others who chose not place their signatures, that we have not been informed about the information contained in the attached \"Notice'' regarding the proposed Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. We believe that the responsibility for BIDlOIDlcing this information to the cormmmity should rest with ColDlSel for Joshua, Attorney Jolm W. Walker, as well as with the LR.SD Board ofDirectors, as designated in the \"Notice.\" We ~e that we have not been informed by the Little Rock School District regarding information contained in the \"Notice.'' Therefore, we respectfully request that you delay your approval or disapproval of the Revised LR.SD Desegregation and Education Plan, pending the following:  Court's Exhibit A 1. Counsel for the Joshua Class, Attorney John W. Walker, should schedule a fonnal hearing to adequately iofonn the Joshua Cius about the Revised LRSD Desesregation and Education Piao. This hearing shall be scheduled at a time conducive to the schedules of working parentl. 2. The hearing shall be attended by a representative fi-om The Fact-Finding Committee, a representative from the LRSD , a represeotative :from ODM. and the Joshua Class. 3. Io sight of the fact that many persons who are defined as \"Joshua\" have not been afforded adequate and timely information regarding the Revised LRSD Desegregation and Education Plan; we request that the LRSD anno1mce an extended deadline to receive written objections to the Piao. The Fact-Finding Committee prayermlly seeks yow approval of this request that represents the concerns ofLRSD Pareots, students, aod friends who were interviewed by our representative, Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed, during the weekend. Again, ''thank yoli' :from The Fact-Finding Committee. and we shall continue to \"Fight For Our Children.\" Respectfully,  J L ~ 1f. fr[a1u,f Hafee:1-~*ed, Chairperson f' cc: All Signees ColDlSel for Joshua Class LRSD ODM Attachments ---------- - - --- -- - - - ---- ---- - ------ - -- - -  .. - - -------- - - --  --- - - . . . -  - - - . . - ---- EDWARD L. WRIGHT ( 1003-1 071) ROBERT S. LINOSEY ( 1013- 1001) ISAAC A. SCOTT,_./R . JOHN G. LILE GORDON S. RATHER, JR. TERRY L. MATHEWS DAVID M. POWELL ROGER A. GLASGOW C. DOUGLAS BUFORD , JR. PATRICK J. GOSS ALSTON JENNINGS, JR. JOHN R. TISDALE KATHLYN GRAVES M. SAMUEL JONES Ill JOHN WILLIAM SPIVEY Ill LEE J. MULOROW-N. M. NORTON EDGAR J. TYLER CHARLES C. PRICE CHARLES T. COLEMAN JAMES J. GLOVER EDWIN L. LOWTHER, JR. CHARLES L. SCHLUMBERGER SAMMYE L. TAYLOR WALTER E. MAY GREGORY T . JONES H. KEITH MORRISON BETTINA E. BROWNSTEIN WALTER McSPAODEN WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 2200 llTTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX (501) 379-0442 OF COUNSEL ALSTON JENNINGS RONALD A. MAY M. TODD WOOD April 9, 1998 ROGER 0 . ROWE NANCY BELLHOUSE MAY JOHN 0 . DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS HENRY KIMBERLY WOOD TUCKER RAY F. COX, JR . HARRY S. HURST . JR . TROY A. PRICE PATRICIA A. SIEVERS JAMES M. MOODY, JR . KATHRYN A. PRYOR J. MARK DAVIS CLAIRE SHOWS HANCOCK KEVIN W. KENNEDY JERRY J. SALLINGS FRED M. PERKINS Ill WILLIAM STUART JACKSON MICHAEL 0. BARNES STEPHEN R. LANCASTER JUDY M. ROBINSON BETSY MEACHAM AINSLEY H. LANG KYLE R. WILSON C. TAD BOHANNON DON S. McKINNEY MICHELE SIMMONS ALLGOOD KRISTI M. MOODY J. CHARLES DOUGHERTY M. SEAN HATCH PHYLLIS M. McKENZIE ELISA MASTERSON WHITE Honorable Susan Webber Wright United States District Judge 600 W. Capitol, Room 302 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 HAND DELIVERED Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, et al. Dear Judge Wright: APR 1 0 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Enclosed are copies of each of the items you directed the PCSSD and Joshua to prepare as regards the amendment to the PCSSD Plan. I have retained the originals for the moment as they do not bear Mr. Walker's signature. Mr. Walker has indicated some doubt about his execution of these documents and I am simply submitting copies so as to comply with the Court's deadline as best I can. By copy of this letter to Mr. Walker, I am asking him to communicate his current position .~o the Court. MSJ/jhs Enclosures Cordially yours, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP Jon~_,/ I I I cc: Counsel of record (w/encl.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. RECE!VED APR 1 0 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENORS JOINT MOTION OF PCSSD AND JOSHUA FOR APPROVAL OF PCSSD'S MARCH 24 PLAN Defendant Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") and the Joshua - lntervenors (\"Joshua\") for their Joint Motion for Approval of PCSSD's March 24, 1998 Plan state: 1. Joshua and PCSSD move for tentative and, ultimately, final approval of PCSSD's March 24, 1998 Plan (attached hereto as Exhibit \"A\"). 2. On October 14, 1997, PCSSD filed its Petition seeking release from federal court jurisdiction (the Petition). Prior to the start of the hearing on the Petition, PCSSD and Joshua engaged in extensive negotiations in an effort to develop an amended plan which both parties could support. Those negotiations resulted in PCSSD's March 24, 1998 Plan. The PCSSD Board of Directors approved the Plan on March 23, 1998 and authorized submission of the Plan to this Court for approval. 3. PCSSD and Joshua stipulate to the following facts in support of this tit Motion: a. That the record in this case supports modification of PCSSD's desegregation obligations; b. That the March 24, 1998 Plan is an appropriate modification of PCSSD's desegregation obligations. c. That the March 24, 1998 Plan is constitutional, workable and fair to Joshua class members; and, d. That, upon approval of the Plan, the PCSSD should be dismissed as a party to this case except as respects its financial claims arising under the settlement agreement. 4. PCSSD and Joshua recognize that their compromise and settlement should not be approved by this Court without notice to Joshua class members. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). Accordingly, PCSSD and Joshua propose dissemination of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit B. This notice shall be published no less than thirty (30) days before a deadline established by this Court for Joshua class members to submit written objections to approval of the March 24, 1998 Plan. PCSSD shall bear all costs associated with publication of the notice. PCSSD shall cause the notice to be published in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; shall print and distribute copies of the notice to teachers; and shall prominently post the notice at all schools. 5. PCSSD and Joshua have prepared for the Court's consideration an Order (attached hereto) granting the relief sought in this Motion. WHEREFORE, PCSSD and Joshua pray that this Court tentatively approve PCSSD's March 24, 1998 Plan, pending the filing of objections filed by Joshua class members; that the notice attached hereto as Exhibit B be published at least thirty (30) 2 days bef~re the deadline for Joshua class members to submit written objections; and that this Court finally approve PCSSD's March 24, 1998 Plan upon consideration of any objections filed by Joshua class members. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings, LLP 200 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 By: 3 THEJOSHUAINTERVENORS John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 By: _________ _ John W. Walker CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On April ___ , 1998, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail to each of the following: Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026 Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Ill 4 Section 1: Pulaski County Special School District Plan Dated March 24, 1998 Prior Agreements and Orders. RECEIVED APR 1 0 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 1. This Plan, which is a \"Desegregation and Education Plan,\" shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreeme:nts and orders in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") with the following exceptions: a. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 28, 1989 ( \"Settlement Agreement\"); b. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; c. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; d. The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; e. The Interdistrict Plan; and f. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting or enforcing sections a. through d. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Plan. SECTION 2: Obligations. 2.1. PCSSD shall in good faith exercise its best efforts to - comply with the Constitution, to remedy the effects of past EXHIBIT 1 I A APR 1 0 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. MEMORANDUM BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS JOINT MOTION OF PCSSD AND JOSHUA FOR APPROVAL OF PCSSD'S PLAN This motion is brought pursuant to the amendment provision of the Pulaski County Special School Distirict permanent Desegregation Plan dated April 29, 1992, as well as Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist. No. 1., 56 F.3d 904, 914 (8th Cir. 1995); Appeal of the Little Rock Sch. Dist., 949 F .2d 253 (8th Cir. 1991 ); Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990). PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings, LLP 200 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 THEJOSHUAINTERVENORS John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 By: _________ _ John W. Walker CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On April ___ , 1998, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. Mail to each of the following: Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026 Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Ill 2 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STAff.S DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, * * * * vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KA IBERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * No. LR-C-82-866 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FBLED US. ulS T;;:1cT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT AR!\u003cANSAS APR 1 0 1998 Before the Court are the initial joint motion and the renewed joint motion filed by the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") requesting that this Court approve the LRSD's proposed Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (\"LRSD Proposed Revised Plan\" or \"proposed Plan\").1 L Approval of the Proposed Plan After evaluating the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, this Court hereby grants the joint motions filed by the LRSD and Joshua and hereby approves the proposed Plan. 1 Docket Nos. 3107 and 3136. 1 A. In 1990, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved the current version ofLRSD Desegregation and Education Plan or the 1990 Plan. In 1996, after the LRSD had operated under the 1990 Plan for six (6) years, this Court scheduled a series of hearings to gather evidence upon which to evaluate the success of the 1990 Plan, along with the settlement plans of the other districts, and the desegregation remedies endorsed therein. 2 At that time, even though the Court had withdrawn supervision over certain aspects of the 1990 Plan, there remained portions of that Plan which were of concern to the Court. Therefore, the Court called expert witnesses to testify, and invited the parties to call other expert witnesses to testify, regarding desegregation remedies in general in an attempt to aid the Court and the parties in evaluating the effectiveness of the 1990 Plan. Those evidentiary hearings were held in May of 1996.3 At those hearings and on several other occasions, the Court has noted that the parties themselves must develop and present for Court approval any proposed modifications to the desegregation and education plans under which they operate. In December of 1996, the LRSD requested and this Court approved a \"plan development period\" in which the LRSD could concentrate its efforts on developing such modifications to the 1990 Plan, in an attempt to 2 Docket No. 2631. 3 The following expert witnesses testified: (1) Herbert J. Walberg, Ph.D., then a Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago . See Docket No. 2692. (2) David J. Armor, Ph.D., then a Research Professor at George Mason University in the Institute of Public Policy. See Docket Nos. 2693, 2694. (3) Gary Orfield, Ph.D., then a Professor of Education and Social Policy at Harvard University and the Director of The Harvard Project on School Desegregation. See Docket No. 2768. 2 improve education and desegregation within the district. Some time during this period, the LRSD commenced negotiations with Joshua regarding modifications to the 1990 Plan. As a result of those negotiations, the LRSD and Joshua agreed upon the provisions included in the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan currently before the Court. B. The LRSD and Joshua have agreed that, if approved, the proposed Plan: shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in the Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, U.S .D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") with the following exceptions: a. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 28, 1989 (\"Settlement Agreement\"); b. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; c. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; d. The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; and, e. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting and enforcing sections a. through d. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Revised Plan. 5 Based upon this provision, this Court considers the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan an entirely new consent decree or settlement agreement between the LRSD and Joshua. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that because the law strongly favors settlements, courts should hospitably receive them, especially in cases such as this in which the parties have engaged in protracted, highly divisive litigation and in which any lasting solution necessarily depends upon the good faith and cooperation of all of the parties. Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Spec. Sch. Dist., 921 F.2d 1371, 1383 (811, Cir. 1990). When evaluating a settlement agreement, \"O]udges should not substitute their own 4 Docket No. 2901. 5 Docket No. 3107, Exhibit A, at 1. 3 judgment as to optimal settlement terms for the judgment of the litigants and their counsel.\" 921 F.2d at 1385 (quoting Armstrong v. Board of Sch. Dirs. of the City of Milwaukee, 616 F.2d 305, 315 (7111 Cir. 1980)). The district court must consider the proposal as submitted by the parties. \"Of course, the district court may suggest modifications but ultimately, it must consider the proposal as a whole and as submitted. Approval must then be given or withheld.\" Id. at 1383 ( quoting Officers for Justice v. Civil Serv. Comm 'n of the City and County of San Francisco, 688 F.2d 615, 630 (91h Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1217 (1983)). Although settlement agreements carry with them a presumption of acceptability, id at 1385, a district court need not automatically approve every settlement agreement the parties submit, id at 13 83 . A court has a strong interest in not involving itself, along with the prestige of the law, in  an ongoing equitable decree which is either manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face. In addition, this is a class action, and courts are not obliged (indeed, they are not pennitted) to approve settlements that are unfair to class members, or negotiated by inadequate class representatives. Id. at 1383 . \"[B]efore a settlement agreement may be rejected because it initiates or authorizes a clearly illegal or unconstitutional practice, prior judicial decisions must have found that practice to be illegal or unconstitutional as a general rule.\" Id at 1385 (quoting Armstrong, 616 F.2d at 321). In the area of desegregation law, the Supreme Court has detennined that the Constitution does not of its own force forbid all-African-American schools. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 26 (1971). The Constitution of its own force also does not require any particular racial percentage in various schools in the districts. Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 740-41 (1974). Furthermore, the Constitution of its own force does not demand that all students 4 regardless of race satisfy national achievement norms. Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70, 100-01 (1995). Obviously, parties in a desegregation case may and indeed should agree to eliminate the effects of prior de Jure segregation to the extent practicable. However, the details of such efforts are not specifically dictated by the Constitution. Even if the court is uncertain that the means proposed in the settlement agreement will succeed in integrating the district or concerned that the lack of sufficient detail in the settlement agreement may impede successful implementation, such concerns alone do not render the settlement agreement unconstitutional on its face, especially when the parties to the settlement agreement have consented to continued monitoring. 921 F.2d at 1385-86. This Court has carefully reviewed the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan as jointly submitted by the LRSD and Joshua and concludes that the Revised Plan is not manifestly unworkable or plainly unconstitutional on its face. The parties have consented to continued monitoring by this Court. Although the Court acknowledges that the Revised Plan will present new challenges in regard to monitoring, these anticipated challenges do not render the Revised Plan unworkable or plainly unconstitutional. Therefore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan should be and hereby is approved. C. In the alternative, if this Court were to consider the proposed Plan as simply a modification of the 1990 Plan, this Court would approve the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan. A party seeking modification of a consent decree \"must establish that a significant change in facts or law warrants revision of the decree.\" Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367, 393 (1992). If the moving party meets this burden, the District Court 5 must then detennine \"whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance.\" Id. at 39 1. The modification \"must not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation,\" nor \"strive to rewrite a consent decree so that it confonns to the constitutional floor.\" Id. Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist. , 56 F.3d 905, 914 (8th Cir. 1995). This Court concludes, after reviewing the circumstances of this case and the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, that this standard for modifying a consent decree has been satisfied. Based upon the voluminous Court record generated by this case since the 1990 Plan was instituted and based upon the conclusions which may be drawn from the evidentiary hearings conducted by this Court in May of 1996, this Court concludes that circumstances and conditions have changed which warrant modifying the 1990 Plan. Specifically, there are certain aspects of the 1990 Plan that have been successfully implemented by the LRSD. Some areas of the 1990 - Plan have been so successfully implemented that this Court has withdrawn supervision over those areas. However, there are other stated goals in the 1990 Plan which have not been achieved. Evidence in the record tends to indicate that the LRSD has put forth minimal effort to achieve certain of these stated goals. More importantly, however, there are certain goals in the 1990 Plan which are out of date for the current situation that exists in the LRSD6 and other specific, rigid goals in the 1990 Plan which expert testimony indicates may never be met, regardless of the amount of effort and good faith put forth by the LRSD. 7 Therefore, the 1990 Plan warrants 6 For example, the sections of the 1990 Plan regarding Student Assignment and Facilities are out of date with regard to the current situation that exists in the LRSD. 7 Specifically, the goals in the 1990 Plan regarding achievement disparity may never be met, regardless of the effort put forth by the LRSD. See the testimony of Dr. Walberg, Docket No. 2692, at 17-25; Dr. Armor, Docket No. 2693, at 18-39; and Dr. Orfield, Docket No. 2768, at 25-31. 6 - -- - - - modification. Furthermore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan furthers the original purpose of the decree in a more efficient way, without upsetting the basic agreement between the parties. The LRSD Proposed Revised Plan is suitably tailored to the changed circumstances, does not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation, and has not been rewritten to conform only to the constitutional floor. Therefore, this Court concludes that the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan should be approved. D. Having approved the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan, this Court notes that once a modification to a consent decree or a decree itself has been approved by the Court, its terms, . including the details, become binding on the parties. 921 F.2d at 1384. Although at this time the - Court does not anticipate the need for further modification, the Court does wish to clarify that if progress under this Revised Plan is clearly insufficient or if certain sections of the Revised Plan should prove to be unworkable, the parties may again apply for a modification of the Revised Plan. Consent decrees partake of the nature of contracts, as well as of judicial action, and parties seeking to change them bear an extremely heavy burden. They are not, however, immutable in any absolute sense, and extraordinary circumstances can arise that would enable the District Court, within its discretion, to consider modifications. Id. at 1387. II. Objections to the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan By previous Order, this Court directed the LRSD to provide notice of the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan and set March 13, 1998 as the deadline for receiving objections to the 7 - proposed Plan from individual members of the Joshua Class and from other parties to the litigation. 8 Dr. Leslie V. Carnine, Superintendent of the LRSD, submitted an affidavit indicating that the LRSD had complied with the Court's Order regarding notice of the proposed Plan. 9 A. The Court notes that although the other school districts and parties in this case were not involved in the negotiations which produced this proposed Plan, those parties were given notice of the proposed Plan and of their ability to object. 10 None of those parties have filed an objection with this Court to the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan. B. On the last day for filing objections, Mr. Markton Cole, on behalf of \"The FactFinding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan--Is It Working For African-American Youthr (\"Fact-Finding Committee\"), filed several documents which he characterized as an objection to the proposed Plan. 11 The documents which Mr. Cole filed included a letter from Ms. Hafeeza Majeed, the Chairperson of the Fact-Finding Committee, and a report initially submitted by the Fact-Finding Committee to the Court on September 20, 1996. In response to the documents filed by Mr. Cole, Mr. John Walker, counsel for Joshua, filed a letter essentially requesting that this Court strike the documents and not consider the 8 Docket No. 3114. 9 Docket No. 3131. 10 Docket No. 3114. 11 Docket No. 3130. 8 - documents an objection to the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan. 12 Mr. Walker claims inter alia: (1) that the documents filed by Mr. Cole and Ms. Majeed had been previously submitted to and considered by this Court; (2) that the documents pertained to the LRSD Desegregation and Education Plan entered into by the LRSD and Joshua in 1990 (\"the 1990 Plan\"), not the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan currently before the Court; and (3) that Mr. Cole and Ms. Majeed lack legal standing to object because they are not residents of the LRSD and do not otherwise allege that either they or their own children will be harmed by the LRSD Proposed Revised Plan. This Court agrees with Mr. Walker's assertions and hereby strikes the documents filed by Mr. Cole on behalf of the Fact-Finding Committee and Ms. Majeed. Specifically, the Fact-Finding Committee report filed by Mr. Cole was previously submitted to this Court in September  "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1695","title":"Court filings concerning exhibit and witness lists, affidavit of Leslie V. Carnine, ODM ''Disciplinary Sanctions in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'', and LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Walker, John W."],"dc_date":["1998-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Education--Finance","School management and organization","School integration","School discipline","School facilities","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning exhibit and witness lists, affidavit of Leslie V. Carnine, ODM ''Disciplinary Sanctions in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)'', and LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1695"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["71 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, Joshua's exhibit list for March 24, 1998, hearing; District Court, Joshua's witness list for March 24, 1998, hearing; District Court, Joshua's supplemental exhibit list for March 24, 1998, hearing; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) witness and exhibit list; District Court, supplemental responses to the Joshua intervenors' interrogatories and requests for production to the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD); District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD), affidavit of Leslie V. Carnine; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''Disciplinary Sanctions in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; District Court, order; District Court, renewed joint motion for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY MAR 9 1QGP lv ...., v LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 OFFlCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER JR. ENCLOSURE MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6, 1998 TO: Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones, Esq. . Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. A ~oo Capitol Towers ~apitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 FROM: John W. Walker Richard Roachell, Esq. Roachell \u0026 Streett 401 W. Capitol Ave. Suite 504 Little Rock, AR Ms. Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: LRSD, et al. v. PCSSD, et al.; NO. LR-C-82-866 ENCLOSURES: JOSHUA'S EXHIBIT LIST FOR MARCH 24, 1998 HEARING JOSHUA'S WITNESS LIST FOR MARCH 24, 1998 HEARING IF ANY OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) ARE NOT ENCLOSED, PLEA.SE CALL THE A.BOVE NUMBER. THANK YOU. --:;_ _----------- .,._ RECE,rlED - MAR 9 i998 OfflCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION .--, -  - ~ ..J -i _ , ' ! LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF VS. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS JOSHUA'S EXHIBIT LIST FOR MARCH 24, 1998 HEARING The Joshua Intervenors submits the documents as exhibits for the hearing scheduled herein for the week of March 24, 1998: 1. PCSSD assessments and evaluations of programs 2. PCSSD academic achievement statistics from 1993 to present . 3. PCSSD discipline statistics from 1992 to present 4. PCSSD recruitment report from 1994 to present 5. PCSSD staff development reports from 1994 to present 6. PCSSD gifted and talented reports from 1994 to present 7. PCSSD extracurricular activities including athletic and nonathletic programs reports from 1994 to present 8. ODM report on Achievement Disparity dated 6/21/95 9. 1998 ODM report on Racial Balance 10. 1998 ODM report on Discipline 11. ODM Report on Staffing dated 9/15/95 12. Excerpts of testimony from Gary Orfield dated May 30, 1996 13. PCCSD reports on Racial Isolation from 1994 to present 14. PCSSD reports 15. PCSSD Discipline Management system 16. PCSSD reports on In-School Suspension and Saturday School 17. PCSSD reports on Pupil Personnel Committee regarding expulsion recommendations 18. PCSSD reports on multicultural education frdm 1994 to present 19. PCSSD reports on special education from 1994 to present 20. UALR reports of PCSSD programs on academic achievement 21. PCSSD reports from the Office of Desegregation from 1994 to present 22. Report of Billy Bowles and Charles Green re: Robinson High School dated November 11, 1996 . 23. ODM Recommmendations regarding Robinson High School 24. Photographs of racial epitah on PCSSD school bus 25. Diagram of racial epitahs on PCSSD property 26 . Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Bobby Lester 27. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony Bobby Altom 28. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Billy Bowles 29. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Eddie Collins 30. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Charles Green 31. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Tommie Anthony 32. Excerpts of Deposition Testimony of Gary Miller By: Respectfully submitted, JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 ( 374-3758 CERT I FI CAT I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading has been served upon all counsel of record, by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail with sufficient postage prepaid, on this 6th day of March, 1998. RECEIVED ' MAR 9 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Ey: - - -----=----=--,- ...,..~ -~, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v...: :'  .._ _.: ,. .. \\ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF VS. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS JOSHUA'S WITNESS LIST FOR MARCH 24, 1998 HEARING The Joshua Intervenors submits the following persons as witnesses for the hearing scheduled herein for the week of March 24, 1998: 1. Bobby Lester, Superintendent of Schools 2. Billy Bowles, Asst. Supt. for Desegregation 3. Eddie Collins, Asst. Supt. for Pupil Personnel 4. Bobby Altom, Asst. Supt. for Instruction 5. Gary Miller, Asst. Supt for Personnel 6. Charles Green, Director of Secondary Education 7. Sarah Womble, Director of Elementary Education 8. Tommie sue Anthony, Coordinator of Talented and Gifted 9. Brenda Bowles, Coordinator of Multicultural Education 10. Martha Asti, Director of Special Education 11. Ruth Hertz, Director of Desegregation 12. Jerry Welch, Coordinator of Student Hearings 13. Doug Ask, Director of Staff Development 14. Mildred Tatum, Member of Board of Education 15. Gwendolyn Williams, Member of Board of Education 16. Georgia Norris, Pupil Personnel Specialist 17. Ann Clem, Pupil Personnel Specialist 18. Bill Barnes, Principal - Mills High School 19. Michael Nellums, Asst. Principal - Mills High School 20. Charles Green, Principal - Jacksonville Middle School 21. _____ Wilson, Asst. Principal - Jacksonville Middle 22. Florine Boone, Asst. Pricnipal Robinson Jr. High 23. Joy Plant, Asst. Principal - Robinson High School 24. Phil Clark, Asst. Principal - Jacksonville 25. Georgia Norris, Pupil Personnel Specialist 26. Dinah Withers, parent 27. Derrick Withers, student 28. Christopher Withers 2 9. Mr. ______ Withers 30. Earnestine Morgan, parent . 31. Antwine Wilson, student 32. Quentin Bailey, parent 33. Emory Moore, parent 34. Emmanuel Moore, student 35. Keith Straughan, Principal - Robinson Jr. 36. Linda Nuggent 37. Sue Martin, Principal, Adkins Elementary 38. Brenda Allen, Principal - Oak Grove High School 39. Coach Steve Adair - Oak Grove High School 40. Linda Clark, parent 41. Ashley Tate, parent 42. James Wiley, parent 43. Jamaal Wiley, parent 44. Marcia Warren 45. Bernice Hooks 540. Marcia Warren 46 . Sharon Patten, parent 47. Coach Wayne Davenport, Robinson High School 48. Peggy Flowers, parent 49. Lakia Watkins, student 50. Lawrence Stewart, parent 51. Lawrence Stewart, Jr., student 52. Janie Lawson, parent 53. Robin Wakefield, parent 54. Velma Moore, parent 55. Lisa Little, parent 56. Mary Anderson, parent -57. James Guy, parent 58. Kim Guy, parent 59. Stephanie Nichols, student 60. Melanie Nichols, student 61. Barbara Trotter, parent 62. Ashley Bush, student 63. Sue Clark, Prinicipal - Sylvan Hills Junior High 64. Charles Ferriter, Asst. Principal - Sylvan Hills High 65. Verna Finney, parent 66. Chris Bolden, parent 67. Mansell Twillle, Asst. Principal - Sylvan Hills Junior 68. Teresa Young, parent 69. Herman Lee, parent 70. Cathy Lee, parent 71. Anita Straw, parent 72. Michael Woods, parent 73. Bertha Farmer, parent 74. Joyce Lowrey, parent 75. Jackie Robinson, parent 76. Gary Parson, Principal - Jacksonville High School 77. Doug Ask, Coordinator of Staff Development 78. Jo Wilcox, Coordinator of Extracurricular Activities 79. Ann Brown, Office of Desegregation Monitoring 80. Margie Powell, Office of Desegregation Monitoring 81. Horace Smith, Office of Desegreation Monitoring 82. Gene Jones, Office of Desegregation Monitoring 83. Melissa Gauldin, Office of Desegregation Monitoring . 84. Norman W. Marshall, Office of Desegregation Monitoring 85. Dr. Steve Ross, Joshua expert witness 86. Michael Anderson, Director of Safety and Security 87. Michael Dobson 88. Richard Rowland 89. Charity Smith, ADE 90. Frank Anthony, ADE Joshua also reserves the right to call any witnesses listed on the list of the defendant, Pulaski county Special School District. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little R ck, -~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the fore~~ing was been hand delivered to all counsel of record on this \u0026ffe day of March, 1998. IN THE .UN!TED STATES DISTRICT COUrtT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANS.ll.S \\JESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF VS. LR-C-82-865 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO . l, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS . LORE~ JOSHUA, ET AL. !NTERVENORS :\\ . .:..THERINE KNIGHT , ET AL. ::::Jfl'ERVEHORS JOSHUA'S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST POR MARCH 2-1..t 19S8 HEARING The Joshua I ntervenors s~brnits the following supplenental documen~s as e xh ibits for the hearing scheduled herein for the week of Earch 24 , 1998 : 1. Curriculum Vitae of Dr . Stave Ross 2. Excerpt s oi Dep::,si-c2.on test ir::.:::-11y of ;::: a ,.,,- i ,j .::..r::,cr 3 . Excerpts of Deposition te.s-:: L-:10ny of Hs~be~i:. Walbe1g 4. ?CSSD a~s~ers to Jos ~~a Inte~rogator~ss 5. PCSSD B~dgets for 199~ to present 6 . PCU 0072 0 7. PCU 1 8. PCU 14-16 9 . ?CU :36 -54 10. PCSSD School Profiles for 1994-95 school year 11. PCTJ ~04 12 . PCG 7 2 1 - 72 2 13. PCSSD TAG Facilitators from 1992 to present 14. PCSSD Advanced Classes and AP Enrollment for 1992 to present 15. ?CSSD Discipline reports dated 1992 to present 16 . PCSSD Special Education Monitoring Reports ~rom 1996 to present Joshua f~r~ter reserves the rights to adopt any exhibit submitted by the defenda~ts, Pulaski County Special School District. ?espectfully sub~i~tad, CERrIFICATE OF SE_R\\TICE I do hereby s~ate that a cop7 cf the foregc!~g was been delievered via ~acs ~~ il~ tc all c cc~sel cf reccrd c~ ~~is Stj of March, 19 98 . day ----- - ----- ------------ SC 137-1 -:11:3':' l,iHLk EF- LHld FI PM John W Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadwqy Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 374-3758 Fax: (501) 374-4187 Ffu--X TRA\"/\\lSMISSION COVER SHEET .Date: To: . . -.. Fax: 371- 0 !0V Re: Sender: YOU SHOULD F.ECEIVE ]._ PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLF-ASE C4LL (501) 374-3758. The informAtion conta..ined in this facsimile message is attorney privileged and. co:.fidential informa.t.ion intended on:y for the u.se cf th: individual or entity urned above. If 6e re.s.der cf this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to delive: it to the l.ntended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution o:- copy.ng of this cowmunicatlon is strictly prohibited. If you have received this commtL\":ication in error, please immediate noti~; us by t.::lephMe, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Pest.al Sen,ice. Thank you. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82 - 866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. PCSSD'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST RECE,IED MAR q 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The PCSSD submits the following as its exhibit and witness list: , EXHIBIT LIST 1. 1989 Releases (attached to Settlement Agreement) 2. ODM Racial Balance Reports 3 . Charts from PCSSD Petition for Release From Federal Court Supervision. 4. Staff Development Data 5. Charts pertaining to cheerleading, drill team, student government, Beta Club, and National Honor Society. 6. Affirmative Action Reports 7. Discipline Reports 8. Handbook for Student Conduct and Discipline i . 9. Secondary Education Report 10. Counselor's Reports 11. Special Education Reports 12. Gifted and Talented Reports 13. Athletic Reports 14. Non-Athletic Reports 15. Biracial Committee Minutes 16. PCSSD Desegregation Plan 17. Interdistrict Desegregation Plan 18. PCU 1039 (Minority AP student recruitment). 19. PCU 1040 (Social Studies Advanced Placement Recommendation Notice). 20. PCU 1041 (Social Studies Advanced Placement Recommendation Followup Student Conference form). 21. The Special Master's Interim Findings and Recommendations concerning PCSSD geography and demographics , dated August 19, 1988, as previously transmitted to the Court on January 20, 1994. WITNESS LIST 1. Bobby Lester, Superintendent, PCSSD; 2. Bill Bowles, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation, PCSSD; 3 . Eddie Collins, Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel Services, PCSSD; 2 4. Dr. Bobby Altom, Assistant Superintendent for Instruction; 5. Gary Miller, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel; 6. Don Stewart, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs; 7. Ed Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services; 8. Charles Green, Director of Secondary Education; 9. Tommie Sue Anthony, Director of Gifted and Talented Programs; 10. Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Education; 11. Brenda Bowles, Coordinator of Multi-Cultural Education. WITNESSES VIA PREVIOUS TESTIMONY 12. 1988 Testimony of Ed Hogan, docket No. 1059-A, dated June 16, 1988, page Nos. 6 through 213; and docket No. 1060 -A, dated June 17, 1988, page Nos. 6 through 162. 13. Douglas A. Ask, Docket No. 2540, testimony beginning at page 95. 14 . Bill Bowles, by recent deposition not yet transcribed. 15. Dr. Bobby Altom, by recent deposition not yet transcribed (including previous testimony given in open court in this case, the docket reference for which we have not yet located) . 3 16. Eddie Collins, by recent deposition not yet transcribed, 17. Charles Green, by recent deposition not yet transcribed. 18. Tommie Sue Anthony, by recent deposition not yet transcribed. 19. Brenda Bowles, by recent deposition not yet transcribed. 20. Dr. Herbert Walberg, Docket No. 2662A (hearing held May 13-15, 1996), transcript filed with the Clerk as Docket No. 2692) 21. Dr. David Armor, Docket No. 2662B (hearing held May 13-15, 1996), transcript filed with the Clerk as Docket Nos. 2693-94). PCSSD reserves the right to use any exhibit or witness referred to or used by the Joshua Intervenors. WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 4 , - . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On March __ f __ , 1998, a copy of the foregoing was served by hand delivery to Mr. Walker and by U.S. Mail on the remainder of the service list: Robert Pressman 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, MA 02173 John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 5 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82 - 866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS . LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIV~i MAR 1 8 1998 OFFICE OF . DESEGREGATION MONITOR/NG PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO THE JOSHUA INTERVENOR$' INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO THE PCSSD (FEBRUARY 1998) The PCSSD for its supplemental responses to the Joshua Intervenors' Interrogatories and requests for production to the PCSSD states the following: INTERROGATORY NO. 3: If any of the persons identified in the answer to interrogatory No . 1 are expert witnesses, please state: (a) (b) (c) all opinions to be expressed by each expert; the basis and the reason for each opinion; all data or other information considered by the witness in forming such opinion. Please include in responding to this interrogatory each (i) employee of the PCSSD to give testimony as an expert, and (ii) any expert to \"te.stify\" by reliance on previous testimony in 1 this case (although intervenors do not concede the appropriateness of reliance on such testimony where there was no opportunity for normal discovery). SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE: As previously stated in response to Interrogatory No. 3, it is possible that Dr. Altom may be called to testify concerning achievement disparity. His opinion, the bases for them, and some of the information considered by him is set forth in his deposition. Some of the reference/research materials used by Dr. Altom in formulating his opinion are as follows: Title Lies My Teacher Told Me The Promised Land American Slavery Warriors Don't Cry Crusaders in the Courts Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs The Content of Our Character The Closing Door Stepping Over the Color Line Beyond the Classroom Forced Justice America in Black and White The End of Racism Outcome Equity in Education Dismantling Desegregation Good Intentions are Not Enough Inside American Education Race 2 Author James Loewen Nicholas Leman Peter Kolchin Melba Beal Jack Greenberg Harry Ashmore Shelby Steele Gary Orield \u0026 Carol Ashkimaze Amy Wells, Robert Crain Laurence Steinberg David Armor Stephan \u0026 Abigail Thernstrom Dinesh D'Souza Robert Berne, Lawrence Picus Gary Orfield, Susan Eaton Katherine Kersten Thomas Sowell Studs Terkel I i I  I I I Statistics. Research Measurement Resource(s) Authors Gerald W. Bracey R. L. Linn, N.E. Gronlund Gilbert Sax WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 By '-,?1~ M. ,s-\u0026muel;Jone ~(76060) ~ for PCSSD CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On March --/ 7- -, 1998, a copy of the foregoing was serv ed by hand delivery to Mr. Walker and by U. S. Mail on the remainder of the service list: Robert Pressman 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, MA 02173 John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr . Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026 Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 3 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg . , Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 , III IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Mi\\R l 8 iS~B Q(-f\\CEOF DESEGREGATIOK MOKllORlNG DEFENDANTS J;NTERVENORS INTERVENORS NOTICE OF FILING The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") hereby gives notice ~f the filing of the Affidavit of Dr. Leslie v. Carnine related to LRSD's compliance with the notice requirements of the District Court's Order entered January 30, 1998. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people ~X depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on this _rL_ day of 414fd...lk,,, , 1998. Mr. John w. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 w. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 nc. Fendley, Jr; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL AFFIDAVIT DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS I, Dr. Leslie V. Carnine, being first sworn, state under oath as follows: 1. I am the Superintendent of the Little Rock School - District. 2. I have reviewed the district court's order of January 30, 1998 which directs the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") to publish notice to the class of Joshua-Intervenors (\"Joshua\") of the pending motion by the LRSD and Joshua for approval of the LRSD Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998. 3. LRSD has complied with the notice publication requirements of the district court's order of January 30, 1998. 4. Copies of the notice were made and distributed to all LRSD teachers on February 13, 1998. 5. The notice was posted in all LRSD schools beginning on February 11, 1998. 6. The notice was broadcast on LRSD' s cable channel on February 13, 18 and 24 and on March 2 and 9, 1998. 7. Attached as Exhibit A to my affidavit is a true and correct copy of proof of publication of the notice in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on February 8, 21 and 28 and on March 7, 1998. Further affiant sayeth not. STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI ) ) ss. ) Dr. LslV. Carnine Superintendent Little Rock School District DATE: ___.3_ -_t,_-~'1~r:....-____ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, on this day of March, 1998. My Comi~s1on Expires: .. 8-1-j{Jo'f 2 Arkana Democrat ~Q5azettc STATEj)'IENT OF LEGAL ADVERTISING Date :=to a..,,.._J__ ~ , ' 9 9 g Remit To; In Account With: Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. P.O. Box 2221 Little Rock, Ark. 72203 To Insure Proper Credit Refer To No ________________ _ Please remit yellow copy with payment .. Invoice No._ 5 '--f ~ 9 AD COPY 3~ Lines at _L_lLl ( ') \u0026 . ----- on the following dates: ____________ _ ~-J, Total Charge - Please Remit do solemnly swear that I am the legal billing clerk of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, a daily newspaper printed and published in said County, State ef Arkansas; that I was so related to this publicatioi:i at and during the publication qf the annexed legal advertisement in the matter of_ ___ _ ____________________ L/L-( -~d::-i ( Q ( Q pending in the _______ Court, in said County, and at the dates of the several publications of said advertisement stated above, and that during said periods and at said dates, said newspaper was printed and had a bona fide circulation in said County; that said newspaper had been regularly printed and published in said County, and had a bona fide circulation therein for the period of one month brf.ore the date of the first publication of s~id adv~rtisement; and that said ~d.ver.; iscmeut was ~uolished in ti1c regular daily issues of said newspaper at s~c1icu above. Subscrib~d and sworn to before me this) day oft 'rr\\.c~ ,1~2 -~__L._--~~- OFFICIAL SEAl VICKI A. MCBRIDE NOTARY PUBLIC. AR.rANSAs PULASKI COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 04-15-2006 Notary Puhl ic    C0 en -en  : . WllElHTEOSTATES .  .  DISTRICT COURT . ; - ....  E.ASTcRN OISTRICT  \u003e OF AOONSAS ..  .. WESTERN DIVISlON Um:E  ROCX\" SCHOOl DISTRICT. PI..AINTIFF ~- (  Ul~-866 PUtASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SC/iOOl DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL OE FENOliNTS MRS. tORENE JOSHUA; ET AL INTERVENORS KAJliERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS .   - NOTICE . TOJ\u003etE JOSHUA ClASS;  All 'PAST. PRESEHT ANO FUTURE .81.ACK OR AfRICAH.AMERICAN PUPILS WHO RESIDE IN PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS. ANO WHQ. ATTEND, HAVE ATTENOEO, Will: ATTENO. OR WHO ARE EUGleLE., WERE EUGl8lE OR Will BE ELK.IBLE TO ATTEND THE PU8UC SCHOOLS OF ONE OF THE THREE PUtASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS (UTllE ROCK. NORlH UT nE POCK OR PUI.ASKJ COUNTY!. THEIR PARENTS ANO/OR NEXT FRIENDS WHO CLAIM, HAVE CLAIMED. OR MAY CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE BEEN DENIED EOUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. OR WHO Cl.AIM. HAVE CLAlMEO OR MAY. CLAIM THAT THEY HAVE BEEN OR' WILL BE THE VICTIMS Of RACE DISGAIMINA TlON IN EOUCA TlON SY. ONE OR MORE OF THE THREE PUl:ASl\u003cl COUNTY SCHOOL OISTRICJS Al:llOR BY THE STA TE Of AR~ arises cu defforts ,. nrq.. ii. 1956 to desegregate Ille~ . Rodi.: Nof1h Utllt Rodi and Naski Coanrr sd'oal dis1rids. In 1989 a SIi ilem1I - radled and apprOl'ld \"' wlich Ille Ult Rodi Sdl00I Oislrid (1.RSO'.) ~ 10 inplemenl lhe !UeIiSdiO\u0026 a~id Plan aPndla nI.l le Olnn- ~ 26. 1 . UISD submiUld ri = Yisect. . apprc r,al aonld LRESdOu'csa Rliotn- Ptaif dated ember 18. 1997. Fcl-lowi, g mnission. LASO and canel fer Jilt Josl'ua ~ (lwerlalt 'Jasllla1 enaaQld \"' el1enSNe Mgl)! lnonul an edoi1 10 dMIOp a rMed 1)1311 ).nic:11 ball, p3l1ies a:iuld SIJIIP0II. Those 118g0lialians resulted ii LRSO's Al!'lised Oesegregaticn and Educalion Plan-dated Jaooa,y 16. 1998 (\"~ 16.A!Med Ptan1,  Clo Januaiy 21, 1997, LASO and Jona filed a jcint request with lhe United  Slates Oisllid Court fer flt Easteni OisliCI ol Arkansas. Ille Hantfabll -Susan Wtib!t Wr91, lar ap, proval ti Ille J3lllll'f 16 ReviMd Plan. Tllc Jrua,y 16 Re'tised Plan baicaly pro:,ideS folows:  -~ ~: Prior Ageements and Or dets:  The:~ 16 Revised Plan wl rtpiace !ht amn1 LASO dese\u003c7egalian !)Ian., !ht lnrimtt ~ Piao-and al exiAng ~ and OlUrt\"oraets wilt1 some exceplians. It wil ~ no did on lhe Sepcern1Jer 21. 1989 . .setllemelt ~ -lhe Ma9- net Sdloal S1i1xmon daled Fellru3ly 2?,)987; lhe (Blrict COlll'I onlef dated ~ 3. {986, pet13r'ling 10 lhe Mq,et, Rt'liew Conrnittee; and. lhe IA-it\u003e-M ~ daled AuC)ust 2E.' 1986. ' Section 2: Otiigalions. LASO's basic ~ obligallons' tlfflain ~ ,. __ lllder lbr;Jaooa,y 16 AMed Plan as lllder Ille amnl ~ plal. The ollliJa1lals ate dea,ty and simply staled and ctNfif Mt'/ asped ol SCll00I ~ - The J3ll,aiy 16 Rl'fised l?tan .irldudes an r,en srong9f c:ommitmtfil 10 an equiCablt disrilution ol lacii11y ),y race. educalion and ezperiencir: .. .')lfp,gh some specifics n inculect; lhe' Jaroaty 16 Revised Plan conltf1'. 911h !hal ~ Ille lr1/1Si1ion ptriocl ~ dis1rid wil idenlily a/ld/Ol de- , Yei011' prog,wns. policies and ~  dw9I relalld IO HCII ollliga1ion. MU pen .setec1ed by lhe dis1ricl and a,\u003eptCIYld _by Joshua w,I assist Ille disn:I ~: ___ . '~ ~ (i/itiiiiiiic~,:mal \"' ltis process. Sealon 3; S1udenC AssicJwnenlS, Under 111t Jaooar, 16 llMld Plan. .,..~movtslromracillt.anca IO quality ecilc:alion. CMnJ 1111 ltrm ol lhe plan. ...,.,..., and ,... lm'igaMy libded lfell t1sWcllI0I cl1 0 alClen:d-a.n c,a. .-,,,.. hoed sd'oals with II many ol llmt neicfblrhoad sd'oals beina ..,.. !llled II p!1dical. Higll scnoal alllllaain zones may be rlli'awn 111 adWtt racial balanca wid'iil pu Of ni- 1111 lllerly P1rt11QJt p0l1IS flall Ill perter1agl ol AiicAmerican ... dents lcr hql sd'oals II I whale and. 10 lhe U1llnl praa,allle. fflli1llin a consislenl leeder paaem. V~ nlradislncl nnsl.s w,I a:intirlll 10 be alowtd I.Im NIis siNar IO !ht 116 111151Udeltassqvnertplan. The sa,dent wqrner'II plan also provides IOr Ille affifflion ol al U1SO ' ~ hql sd'oals 10 middle sdl00ls Jar grades six. - and eigtt a. cause ol capacily lrnllalionl  LRSO's Higll Sdloais. lhe aJnYtlSDI ID rridlll sa100ls may ~ lht aealion ol lllO IW11II grade scnools. Fc,ally. Ille Jaruary 16 AIYist Plan alls for Ille ainslruaion ol at least IIIO new aiea elementary sd1cois. one ii wes1 Lilllt Rod\u003c and one  Ille  ol !ht lormet Stepnens scllaal. When lhe new Stephens Elementa,y opens. one  Ol men Ille lncenM Sdloals wil be dosed. Seoon : lnlenislrid Sdloals. i lnferdaic:I sd'oals wil Cllf1lirue Ill : ~111ht'(dd:lhtlnlenis-l ~Adlievement The Jnlaly 16 Rl'lised Plan is loundld on a. belief lhal llf0'li:ing .,. err S1Udelt a quu1y edUCalion is ll1t j 111051 piomisr,g means ID lhe lq-tlrm deseqregalion ol LASO. It 0Ullines UISO's 1lasic sraiegy 1or 11\\uing a  S1Udents reaM a quality eclJcatiaa.  . indules an ur1y clildl00d dJCllion ' prt)113111.11Med~ ' ans am:wn lffl!)llasimg lhe prima-ry gr1deS. a rl'lised malhtmalics a,. ri:wn,anabmaMeciJCllianpn,grarn and pnntJI and CXlffll1Uily nvclYefflenl prt)l13l1I. MtfM ~ piece ol lht SIUdtnl achilMmel1  lion is a \u003cXllege scnolal!lip progra,n lar al studenlS who attend raa4y idenli6- ablt elemenWy sd1cois. Seoon 6: LRSD Compiance Pro- ~ wil ~ a ~ siYe ~ ~ ID ensure l subslanlialy ccmplies widl i1s desagr.gation ollligalicns and i1s Olher legal andet'ic:alobliQalions. . Sedion 7: Plan Mocillca1ion Pro-  Q!SS. The .Jaruaty 16 Re'lised Plan ndudes a pt0CeSS fer plan mocific3lion designed IO !date CXl0!)ffl1ion and disaxnge itigillion. LASO wil S1irni1 proposed plan mocilicalionl ID lhe ofl. \" panes wno wl hM an eSlabislled time lr3lne lor oomments and su,pslions. LASO wil !hen submil i1s ,_ ' mended plan modi6calion lar aut ap, prova. Pat1in would gane,aly be pnlholld lrom   issues belare .. dis1ricl CIJUtl ~ M1g .. c:ommenl period. ~~~~ r,g ~~~~ow:- . ganllng _,,...,_ yeaIrIs-. I  The plan establishes a process lar adffl! ing QlfflPlianca issues again desqled 10 ldlart C00!)ttalion and m- Cllln9' itigalion. Al ~ issues wil l'nl be subniatd Ill LASO. I no ageornen1 is readied. !he issue wil : be subnit1ed 10 OOM lar lacililalion. Only i OOM's ettons ii lacililating an aq,eemn Iii would lht issut be subnilted Ill lhe dislriclaut larresolueion. Seoon 9: T em1. The tenn ol Ille Rl'lised Oesegr lion and Educalion Plan wil be !hrN sctoa1 years begiming !he 1998-99 sd'oal yea, and enor-,q on Ille lasl day ol classes ol Ille ~1 sdl00I yeat. Fedefal court supervision wil end ii !NI time, and Ille dislricl wil rn#II IO local conllOI. Sedion 10: Transition. Thi 1997-98 SChool yea, and 1he 1n1 - ol lhe 1998-99 SChool ye wil be a rnitioA period in ptlpllllion ~ ~llalioll ol Ille Jaooa,y Section 11: ~ Stalus. I LASO subslanlialy metlS its obligalior, s l6idef lhe Jnwy 16 Rl'fised Plan. U1SO wil be inwy at lhe condusicll ol its llml and released from aut SllllMlion. The al\u003eowe is nol intended 10 be I U, dllailed-... of !ht RIIIIIY 16 flMtd Plan. The Jniary 16 RMld Pal. along with lhe amnt U1SO 0.. ~ Plan and lnletdislrict 0.. SIIJegation Plan. will be made MialJlt IO Josbla dass members cuinQ ~ business hotn ii LASO's aorrwilnM olbs al 810 W. Mar1lharn, UlltRodl.Arkwas. The purpose ol llis noCica is 10 advise Jos/111 dass membets ol lhe J3lllll'f 16 Revised \"'-1 and 10 rjve '- an appotmiy Ill show cause Ol III pivwidt - objeclions which ~ ,ol,y Ill nary 16 Rftised Plan shoud nol be ilj)plOYtd by lhe Dislrict Cotrt. Joslm Cius membets hM ,  lll'!.l t,e !~li',y of Marth, 1998 ID lit - Cl0rllMU Ol objeaions wifl lk. James McConnidl. U.S. Oislrid CCIII Oedt. U.S. Ccu1nouse, 600 W. ~ I.JIit Rock. Mansas 72201. Al Joslm class membets will be ll0lrd by lhe Dislrict Court's decision IJlllllMl!IOlrejec:!irq lhe~ 16 Al'listd  Plan. Absenl good cause --. there will be no heamg on whether flt J3lllll'f 16 Revised Plan shoud bl approved. ~. hs Hoict l)ffMdes Jona class nwnbtrs their Olly opporu,ity Ill olljed Ill ~oval \u003cJI lht Jnwy 16 Revised UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARl\u003cANSAS. WESTERN DIVISION \u0026166578 IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION UTILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * FILED U.S . DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAR t 7 1998 DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * RECEIVED Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * MAR 1 8 1998 Intervenors, * * OFFICE OF KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * DESEGREGATION MONITORING Intervenors. * ORDER By prior Order, 1 this Court set March 13, 1998 as the deadline for receiving objections regarding the January 16 Revised Plan. Attached hereto as Exhi "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1689","title":"Court filings concerning LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants, and ODM report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1998-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Joshua Intervenors","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School integration","School enrollment","School improvement programs","School facilities","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants, and ODM report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1689"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["111 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, order; District Court, joint motion of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and Joshua for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, memorandum brief in support of joint motion of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and Joshua for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, two orders; District Court, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants; District Court, addendum to districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants; District Court, order; District Court, memorandum opinion and order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education project management tool  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * * FILED EA U.S. DISTRICT COURT STERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS JAN I 2 1998 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * RECEIVED Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. , * J.i\\i I } 3 1998 Intervenors, * * OFFICE OF KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * DESES.REGATICN MONITORlrJG Intervenors. * ORDER Before the Court is a motion filed by the Pulaski County Special School District - (\"PCSSD\") requesting that this Court grant summary judgment on the issue of the state funding formula. 1 The Arkansas Department of Education (\" ADE\") has responded to the PCSSD's motion.2 After carefully considering the motion and the response, this Court denies the PCSSD's motion for summary judgment on the issue of the state funding formula. Summary judgment is appropriate when \"the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the. affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material- fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This Court concludes that there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding the state funding formula. 1 Docket No. 3042. 2 Docket No. 3051. 104 Previously, this Court entered Orders granting summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions, 3 granting summary judgment on the issue of health insurance, and denying summary judgment as to special education and loss funding. 4 Currently, several of these issues are on appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eighth Circuit has yet to rule, and therefore, these issues remain unresolved. These unresolved issues relate to the issues raised by the PCSSD in its current motion for summary judgment pending before this Court. Furthermore, although not of record in this case, recent newspaper reports indicate that certain aspects of the funding formula are still being litigated in Arkansas state court. See Cynthia Howell, Lawyers Seek to Delay Trial in School Funding Suit, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Jan. 8, 1998, at 2B. Because there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding the state funding formula, this Court denies the PCSSD's current motion for summary judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS ff\\._day of January 1998. 3 Docket No. 2930. 4 Docket No. 2968. ~ ~,4t.1 UNITED STA ~ISTRICTJ GE fHfS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCk:ET SHEET IN COUPUANCE ~ RULE 5e ANOOA 7'9(8) FACP ON 1//t;;. ~ . IV  l/l1 :_ 2 MICHAEL E. GANS - Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT \u0026 CUSTOM HOUSE 1114 MARKET STREET ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63101 January 16, 1998 VOICE (314) 539-3600 ABBS (BOO) 652-8671 Is. wustt.edu/Sth.cir RECEIVED Mr. Jim McCormack Clerk U.S. DIS1RICT COURT, EASTERN ARKANSAS Room 402 600 W. Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201-3325 JAN 2 1 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORINQ Re : 96-2047EALR L.R. School Dist. vs. Servicemaster Manag. Dear Clerk: The mandate of this Court is enclosed together with a receipt. Will the clerk of the district court please sign, date and return the receipt to this office. w~~~rt.~ Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court led Enclosure( s) District Court Clerk-Re : Files _x_Enclosed please find : 1 vol. 1R {J)a-J.nor- ~~e_J\\ 'Wt/!(J,,:m,Jj;) ( LETIER FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY) cc: Christopher John Heller Joseph Steven Mowery John C. Everett Samuel Arnold Perroni William Henry Trice III Richard Wilson Roachell John W. Walker Robert Pressman Norman J . Chachkin Philip K. Lyon M. Samuel Jones III Nelwyn Leone Davis Tim C. Humphries Office of Desegregation Monitor Horace Alvin Walker Perlesta Arthur Hollingsworth Kenneth G. Torrence Otis Henr y Storey District Court/Agency Case Number(s) : 82-CV -866 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~Q~t l~Ti:llCT cfJRT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 1 111 ~ D,S I RI T Ar- '\\, N~\u003clS WESTERN DIVISION JAN 2 1 1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT J,%1~S WM CORMACK, Cl r:-r:i:\u003c B;:: PLAmTIFF O::? C~~ .~ v. LR-C-82-866 RECEIVED PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL JAN 2 3 1998 DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS OFFICE Of KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DESEGREGATION MONITORING INTERVENORS JOINT MOTION OF LRSD AND JOSHUA FOR APPROVAL OF LRSD'S REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Plainti.,ff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") for their Joint Motion For Approval_ of - LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan state: 1. Joshua and LRSD move for tentative and, ultimately, fina l approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (attached hereto as Exhibit A). 2. On September 26, 1997, LRSD submitted and requested approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated  September 18, 1997. Following submission, LRSD and Joshua engaged in extensive negotiations in an effort to develop a revised plan which both parties could support. Those negotiations resulted in LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (\"January 16 Revised Plan\"). On that date, counsel for Joshua confirmed in writing Joshua's agreement to support approval of the January 16 Revised Plan. See Exhibit B. Also on that same date, the LRSD Board of Directors approved the Janua~y 16 Revised Plan and authorized submission of the plan to this Court for approval. 3. LRSD and Joshua stipulate to the following facts in support of this Motion: a. that the record in this case supports modification of LRSD's desegregation obligations; b. that the January 16 Revised Plan is an appropriate modification of LRSD's desegregation obligations; c. that the January 16 Revised Plan is constitutional, workable and fair to Joshua class members; and, d. that, if LRSD substantially complies with its obligations under the January 16 Revised Plan during its term and implements in good faith the programs, policies and procedures related thereto, LRSD will be unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations at the end of the 2000-01 school year. 4. As a part of the compromise and settlement between LRSD and Joshua, Joshua has agreed that they will request that the Court of Appeals for the Eighth circuit hold their two pending appeals in abeyance, and LRSD and Joshua have further agreed that they will attempt to resolve Joshua's past, present and future claims for attorneys' fees and costs by mediation. 5. LRSD and Joshua recognize that their compromise and settlement cannot be approved by this Court without notice to Joshua class members. ~ Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). Accordingly, LRSD and Joshua propose dissemination of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit c. This notice shall be published no less than thirty (30) days before a deadline established by this Court for Joshua 2 class members to submit written objections to approval of the January 16 Revised Plan. LRSD shall bear all costs associated with publication of the notice. LRSD shall cause the notice to be published in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; shall print and distribute copies of the notice to teachers; shall prominently post the notice at all. school; and shall cause the notice to be broadcast over the cable television channel controlled by LRSD. 6. In light of their agreement, LRSD and Joshua respectfully request that the hearing currently scheduled for the week of February 2, 1998 be cancelled.  7. LRSD and Joshua have prepared for the Court's consideration an Order (attached hereto) granting the relief sought in this Motion. WHEREFORE, LRSD and Joshua pray that this Court tentatively approve LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1997, pending the filing of objections filed by Joshua class members; that the notice attached hereto as Exhibit c be published at least thirty (30) days the deadline for Joshua class members to submit written objections; that the hearing currently scheduled for the week of February 2, 1998 be cancelled; and that this Court . finally approve LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1997 upon consideration of any objections filed by Joshua class members. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS 3 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE, CLARK First Commercial Bldg., Suite 2000 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 s. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 374-3758 BY: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following pe?jes~ depositing a copy of same in the United states mail on this day of January, 1998. Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 w. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 General 4 SBC'l'IOII 1: Little Rock . School District Revised Desegregation and Education Plan January 16, 1998 Prior Agreements and Orders. 1.1. This Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") with the following exceptions: a. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 2 8 , 1989 (\"Settlement Agreement\"); b. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; c. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; d. The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; and, e. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting or enforcing sections a. through d. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Revised Plan. 1. 2. This Revised Plan does not affect the Joshua Intervenors' (\"Joshua's\") right to enforce the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan with respect to the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") and the North Little ' Rock School District (\"NLRSD\"). 1.3. Although this Revised Plan supersedes the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan, LRSD expects to continue to work cooperatively with PCSSD and NLRSD in the areas addressed by the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. \"i' EXHIBIT I A SBCTXOH 2: Obligations. 2.1. LRSD shall in good faith exercise its best efforts to comply with the Constitution, to remedy the effects of past discrimination by LRSD against African-American students, to ensure , that no person is discriminated against on the basis of race, color or ethnicity in the operation of LRSD and to provide an equal educational opportunity for all students attending LRSD schools. 2.1.1. LRSD shall retain a desegregation and/or education expert approved by Joshua to work with LRSD in the development of the programs, policies and procedures to be implemented in accordance with this Revised Plan and to assist LRSD in devising remedies to problems concerning desegregation or racial discrimination which adversely affect African-American students. 2. 2. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure that LRSD hires, assigns, utilizes and promotes qualified African-Americans in ' a fair and equitable manner. 2.2.1. LRSD shall maintain in place its current policies and practices relating to the recruitment of AfricanAmerican teachers which have allowed LRSD to maintain a teaching staff which is approximately one-third African-American. 2.2.2. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to increase the number of African-American media specialists, guidance counselors, early childhood teachers, primary grade teachers and secondary core subject teachers, including offering incentives for African-American teachers to obtain certification in these areas, and to assign those teachers 2 to the LRSD schools where the greatest disparity exists. 2,2.3. LRSD shall establish a uniform salary schedule for all positions within the district, including a salary range for director and associate and assistant superintendent positions, designed to provide compensation in accordance with qualifications and to minimize complaints of favoritism. 2.2.4. LRSD shall implement a policy for the centralized hiring and assignment of teachers by the LRSD Human Resources Department designed to provide an equitable distribution of teaching resources and to prevent nepotism and preselection by a school principal. 2.2.s. LRSD shall implement a policy of promotion from within which shall include procedures for notifying district employees of open positions. 2.2.6. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that the teaching staffs at all LRSD schools are substantially similar with regard to average years of experience and percentage of teachers with advanced degrees. 2.2.7. LRSD sha,l l negotiate with the Knight Intervenors to establish a procedure for the mandatory reassignment of teachers as necessary to enable LRSD to meet its obligations under Section 2.2 of this Revised Plan. 2.3. LRSD shall implement student assignment programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure the desegregation of LRSD schools to the extent practicable, including but not limited to Sections 3 and 4 of this Revised Plan. 3 2. 4. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination in the referral and placement of students in special education or in other programs designed to meet special student needs. 2. 5. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination with regard to student discipline. 2.5.1. LRSD shall strictly adhere to the policies set forth in the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook to ensure that all students are disciplined in a fair and equitable manner. 2.5.2. LRSD shall purge students' discipline records after the fifth grade and eighth grade of all offenses, except weapons offenses, arson and robbery, unless LRSD finds that to do so would not be in the best interest of the student. 2.5.3. LRSD shall establish the position of \"ombudsman\" the job description for which shall include the following responsibilities: ensuring that students are aware of their rights pursuant to the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook, acting as an advocate on behalf of students involved in the discipline process, investigating parent and student complaints of race-based mistreatment and attempting to achieve equitable solutions. 2.5.4. LRSD shall work with students and their parents to develop behavior modification plans for students who exhibit frequent misbehavior. 2. 6. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures 4 . I designed to promote participation and to ensure that there are no barriers to participation by qualified African-Americans in extracurricular activities, advanced placement courses, honors and enriched courses and the gifted and talented program. 2.6.1. LRSD shall implement a training program during each of the next three years designed to assist teachers and counselors in identifying and encouraging African-American students to participate in honors and enriched courses and advanced placement courses. 2.6.2. LRSD shall implement programs to assist African-American students in being successful in honors and enriched courses and advanced placement courses. LRSD shall provide transportation to students otherwise eligible for transportation to school to allow those students to participate in after-school activities required for participation in an extra-curricular activity. 2. 7. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to improve and remediate the academic achievement of African-American students, including but not limited to Section 5 of this Revised Plan. 2. 7.1. LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to Section 2.7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving African-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve African-American achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of ( - 5 either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. 2. 8. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures during each of the next three years designed to promote and encourage parental and community involvement and support in the operation of LRSD and the education of LRSD students. 2. 9. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure an equitable allocation and/or reallocation of financial, technological and educational resources to LRSD schools. 2. 9. 1. Within 60 days of the district court's approval of this Revised Plan, LRSD, after consultation with Joshua, will develop a process or standard for assessing the equitable allocation of resources. 2.9.2. Within 180 days of the district court's approval of this Revised Plan, LRSD shall report by school the results of its assessment of the allocation of resources. 2.10. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure the equitable maintenance and repair of LRSD facilities. 2.11. LRSD shall implement programs, procedures designed to ensure that there discrimination in the services. provision of guidance policies and/or is no racial and counseling 2 .11. 1. Guidance counselors shall work with students in an effort to provide for more equity in academic honors, awards and scholarships. 6 2.12. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that every LRSD school provides its students a learning environment free from discrimination. 2 .12. 1. LRSD shall implement a training program through the United States Department of Justice, the Arkansas Department of Education and/or the National Conference of Christians and Jews in prejudice reduction and cultural sensitivity. 2.12.2. LRSD shall implement policies and procedures for investigating the cause of racial disparities in programs and activities and developing remedies where appropriate. 2.13. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure LRSD substantially complies with its obligations  under this Revised Plan. 2.13.1 The LRSD Superintendent shall be responsible for overseeing LRSD's compliance with this Revised Plan in accordance Section 6. SECTION 3: Student Assignments. 3.1. Attendance Zones. While this Revised Plan does not require any sudden or drastic changes to the present student assignment plan, LRSD attendance zones may be redrawn in accordance with the following guidelines: 3.1.1. Satellite Zones. attendance zones where the impact LRSD may eliminate satellite would be to reduce the transportation burden on African-American students; 3. 1. 2. Neighborhood Schools. LRSD may assign students 7 to area1 elementary and junior high/middle schools based on reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zones drawn to create as many truly desegregated schools (from forty to sixty percent African-American) as reasonably practicable, except as provided in Section 3.1.3. below; 3.1.3. Exception. Where a reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zone will result in an elementary or junior high/middle school which is less than twenty percent AfricanAmerican, LRSD reserves the right to either: a. Draw the attendance zone at less than full capacity to allow for the voluntary transfer of African-American students to the school; or, b. Create one or more satellite attendance zones of primarily African-American students. If a satellite zone is established, it shall be of su'f ficient size to ensure substantial desegregation at the school. 3. 1.4. High Schools. LRSD may assign students to area high schools based on attendance zones drawn so that the percentage of African-American students at each high school shall be within plus or minus twenty percentage points from the percentage of African-American students for high schools as a whole and so that, to the extent practicable, a stable and predictable feeder pattern exists from LRSD junior high/middle schools. 3.2. Voluntary student Transfers. Beginning in the 1998-99 1The term \"area\" school shall refer to all LRSD schools except magnet and interdistrict schools. 8 school year, the following guidelines shall govern voluntary student transfers: 3.2.1. Desegregation Transfers. LRSD students whose race constitutes more than sixty percent of the population at their attendance zone school shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school where their race constitutes le~s than forty percent of the student population subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3. 2. 2. Racial Isolation Transfer. LRSD students whose attendance zone school is a one race, African-American school (~ 90% African-American) shall be permitted to transfer to a racially balanced LRSD area school subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.3. Magnet Program Transfer. LRSD students shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school to participate in a designated magnet program subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.4. Employees' ,Child Transfer. LRSD employees who reside in the LRSD may choose to have their children attend the same school or campus at which the employee works, not including Magnet schools, subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3. 2. 5. Special circumstances Transfer. Upon a showing of a special need arising out of circumstances unique to a particular student, a student may, at the sole discretion of LRSD, be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school subject to 9 capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.6. outside students. LRSD schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will improve the racial balance of the district as a whole and of the school to which the student wishes to transfer and subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; and, 3.2.7. Transportation . LRSD shall provide transportation to voluntary transfer students with the following ,. exceptions: (i) employee's child transfers, (ii) special circumstances transfers, and (iii) transfers from outside Pulaski County. 3.3. Magnet Programs. The designated magnet programs at this time are the following: a. Rockefeller Early Childhood Program; b. King High Intensity Learning Program; c. Washington Math Science Program; d. Henderson Health Science Program; e. Dunbar International Studies/Gifted and Talented Program; ,. f. Central International Studies Program; and, g. McClellan Business Communications Program. LRSD reserves the right to modify or discontinue designated magnet programs and to establish new magnet programs. However, LRSD agrees that during the term of this Revised Plan it will not modify 10 or discontinue a magnet program which is successful. 3.4. Middle Schools. LR.SD shall establish a schedule for the orderly conversion of some or'all of its junior high schools to middle schools for grades six, seven and eight and move the ninth grade to high schools. As a part of this conversion, LRSD reserves the right to chan9e the grade level structure at all of its schools, including magnet schools. 3. 5. Ninth Grade Schools. Because of limited capacity at LRSD's high schools, it may be necessary as a part of the orderly conversion to middle schools to establish two or more schools composed entirely of ninth grade students. If so, LRSD shall assign students to the ninth grade schools based on attendance zones drawn so that the percentage of African-American students at each ninth grade school shall be within plus or minus ten percentage points from the district-wide percentage of ninth grade African-American students. 3.6. School Construction/Closing. LRSD shall construct at least two new area elementary schools, one in west Little Rock and one at the site of the former Stephens school. When the new Stephens Elementary opens, it shall receive additional funding as described in Section 5.5 of this Revised Plan and one or more of the schools identified in Section 5.5 will be closed. When a school identified in Section 5.5 is closed, LRSD shall exercise its best efforts to find a community or educational use for the property. Otherwise, LRSD sI+all not seek to close schools in African-American neighborhoods solely because of age or poor 11 maintenance except when a new school will be located in the same general area. 3.7. Modification Standard. During the term of this Revised Plan, LRSD shall not recommend modifications to attendance zones or grade level structure or the construction, enlargement or closing of a schools other than as provided in this Revised Plan unless: 3.7.1. Such action would further the goal of desegregating LRSD or eliminating the vestiges of discrimination to the extent practicable; or, past 3.7.2. The LRSD Board of Directors determines ( i) that the educational benefits expected from such action substantially outweigh any adverse effects of the proposed action, (ii) that no practical alternative to the proposed action exists which will accomplish the educational objective, and (iii) that to the extent practicable measures will be initiated to counteract any adverse affects of the proposed action. 3.8. Racial Balance. This Revised Plan recognizes that the ,. desegregation of LRSD to the extent practicable does not require that every LRSD school be racially balanced. Accordingly, nothing in this Revised Plan shall be construed as requiring a particular racial balance at every LRSD school or as obligating LRSD to recruit students to obtain a particular racial balance in every LRSD school. 3.9. Housing. LRSD and Joshua co:mmi t to promote housing desegregation within segregated neighborhoods. They pledge to work together and use their best efforts to dismantle, and prevent 12  recurrence of, segregated housing patterns. SBC'l'IO 4: Interdistrict schools. LRSD and PCSSD shall operate Interdistrict Schools in accordance with the following: 4.1. PCSSD Interdistrict Schools. PCSSD shall operate Baker Elementary, Clinton Elementary, Crystal Hill Elementary and any new elementary school constructed in Chenal Valley as Interdistrict Schools; 4. 2. LRSD Interdistrict Schools. LRSD shall operate King Elementary, Romine Elementary and Washington Elementary as Interdistrict Schools; 4. 3. Racial Composition. The ideal composition at interdistrict schools shall be as close to 50%-50% as possible with the majority race of the host district remaining the majority race at the Interdistrict School; 4.4. Reserved Seats. PCSSD shall reserve at least 200 seats at Clinton Elementary and up to 399 seats at Crystal Hill Elementary for interdistrict transfer students from LRSD; 4.5. Recruitment. LRSD and PCSSD agree to implement programs at Interdistrict Schools designed to attract interdistrict transfers and to work cooperatively to recruit interdistrict transfers to Interdistrict Schools; 4.6. Outside Students. Interdistrict Schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will assist the Interdistrict School in achieving its ideal racial composition; and, 13 4. 7. Transportation. Transportation shall be provided by the home district for interdistric, t transfers from Pulaski County to Interdistrict Schools. \u0026BCTIOB s: student Achievement. 5.1. Early Childhood Education. LRSD shall implement an early childhood education program which shall include a HIPPY program and a four year-old program with no less than 720 seats. LRSD contemplates that the four yearold classes will remain at their present sites or in the same general location. 5.2. Reading/Language Arts. 5.2.1. Primary Grades. LRSD shall implement at least the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in kindergarten through the third grade: a. Establish as a goal2 that by the completion of the third grade all students will be reading independently and show understanding of words on a page; b. Focus teaching efforts on reading/language arts instruction by teaching science and social studies content through _ reading/language arts and mathematics experiences; c. Promote thematic instruction; 2The identification of specific goals in this Revised Plan is not intended to create an obligation that LRSD shall have fully met the goal by the end of the plan's term. LRSD's failure to obtain any of the goals of this Revised Plan will not be considered a failure to comply with the plan if LRSD followed the strategies described in the plan and the policies, practices and procedures developed in accordance with the plan. 14 d. Identify clear objectives for student mastery of all three reading cueing systems (phonics, semantics and syntax) and of knowing-how-to-learn skills; e. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; f. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts and mathematics instruction; g. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; h. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement in order to help facilitate the academic development of the students; i. Provide pre-kindergarten, kindergarten and first grade learning readiness experiences for students who come to school without such experiences; j. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all students in diverse, mainstreamed classrooms; k. Use the third and/or fourth grade as a transition year from focused reading/language arts and mathematics instruction to a more traditional school day; and, 1. Provide opportunities for students to perform and display their academic training in a public setting. 5. 2. 2. Intermediate Grades. LRSD intends to implement at least the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in grades four through six: 15 ,. ,. a. Adopt as a goal that by completion of the sixth grade all students will master and use daily higher level reading comprehension skills for learning in all subject areas, for making meaning in real life experiences and for personal growth and enjoyment; b. Promote thematic instruction; c. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts, mathematics, science and social studies instruction;  d. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; e. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; f. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement in order to help facilitate the academic development of the students; g. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all  "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_768","title":"School lunch program","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","Student assistance programs","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["School lunch program"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/768"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1,1998 For more information: Zeomee Herts, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District today announces its policy for providing free and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has acopy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party. The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a welfare agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annual 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10,465 14,105 17,745 21385 25,025 28,665 32305 35545 Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual ...873 1,176 1,479 1,783 2,086 2389 2,693 2,996 2(K 272 342 412 482 552 622 692 1, 2, 3. 4. 5, 6 7 8 14,893 20,073 25353 30,433 35,613 40,793 45,973 51,153 Monthly Weekly 1342 1,673 2,105 2,537 2,968 3,400 3,832 4363 287 387 486 586 685 785 885 984 For each additional household member add\nFor each additional household member add: +3,640 +304 +70 +5,180 +432 +100 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfast application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (more)07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 31,1998 Page 2 of 3 food stamp office that a child is a member of a household currently receiving food stamps. School officials will notify households of their eligibility and that the households must notify die school when tliey no longer receive food stamps Households who are notified of their eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notified oftheir eligibility by September 3,1998. AppHcation fonns are being distributed by the school with a letter informing households of the availability of free and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principal s office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the application and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on the application will be used for the purpose of determining eligibility and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any time during the school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss the decision with the determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report (more)07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 31,1998 Page 3 of 3 increases in household income of over $50.00 per month or $600 per year or decreases in household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if the household size increases, the household should contact the school, Such changes may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. In the operation of the child feeding programs, no child will be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.Irsd.kl2.ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1,1999 For more information: Zeomee Herts, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District today announces its policy for providing free and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has acopy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party. The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a wetfrre agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annua] 1 2 3 45 6 8 10,712 14378 18,044 21,710 25376 29,042 32,708 36374 Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual ...893 1,199 13(M 1,810 2,115 2,421 2,726 3,032 206 277 347 418 488 559 629 700 1. 2. 34 5. 6. 7 8. 15344 20,461 25,678 30395 36,112 41329 46346 51,763 Monthly Weddy 1371 1,706 2,140 2375 3,010 3,445 3,879 4314 294 394 494 595 695 795 896 996 For each additional household member add: For each additional household member add: +3,666 +306.... ... +71 +5^17 M35., +101 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfest application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (mce) 07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 30,1999 Page 2 of 3 food stamp oflBcelhat a child is a member of a household currently receiving food stands. School officials will notify households of their eligibility and that the households must notify the school when they no longer receive food stamps. Households who are notified of fiieir eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notifiedoftheir eligibility by Sqjtcmber 3,1999. Af^cahon fims are being distributed by the school with a letter infbnning households ofdie availability office and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principals office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the ^rplication and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on die application will be used for the purpose of determining eli^bili^ and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any time during the school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss foe decision with foe determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report (more)07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 30,1999 Page 3 of 3 increases in household income of over $50,00 per month or $600 per year or decreases in household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if the household size increases, the household should contact the school. Such chaises may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. In the operation of the child feeding programs, no child will be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 We,st Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.lrsd.kl2-ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1, 2001 For more information: Suellen Vann, 324-2020 The Little Rock School Di strict today announces its poUcy for providing fiee and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has a copy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party- The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a welfare agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annual 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, 7 8 11,167 ,. 15,093 ,. 19,019 , 22545, 26,871 , 30,797. 34,723. 38,649 . Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual .. 931. 1558. 1585 1,913 2540 2567 2,894 3521 215 291 366 442 517 593 668 744 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 678 15,892. 21,479, 27,066. 32,653 38240 43,827 .49,414 ,55,001 Monthly Weekly 1325 1,790. 2256 2.722 3.187 3653 4.118 4584 .306 ..414 ., 521 .,628 .,736 ..843 ..951 1,058 For each additional household member add\n+3526 +328 +76 For each additional household member add\n+5587 +466 +108 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfast application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (more) 08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals August 1, 2001 Page 2 of 3 food stamp office that a child is a member of a household currently recei ving food stamps. School officials will notify households of thcircli gibili ty and that the households must notify the school when they no longer receive food stamps. Households who are notified of their eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notified of their eligibility by September 4,2001. Application forms are being distributed by the school with a letter informing households of the availability of free and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principals office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the application and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on the application wi 11 be used for the purpose of determining eligibility and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any rime during the .school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss the decision with the determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report increases in household income of over $50.00 per month or $600.00 per year or decreases in (more)08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PACE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals August 1,2001 Page 3 of 3 household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if ihe household size increases, the household should contact the school. Such changes may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. \"In accordance with Federal law and U.S- Department of Argriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on rhe basis of race, color, national orgin, .tex, age, or disability. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.\" JI II /IFree/Reduced Lunch Study 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Enrollment Total F/R % of Enroll '' Black Enroll Black F/R H % of BlackE Non-B Enroll Non-B F/R # % of Non-B 25,231 12,013 48% 16,380 10,172 62% 8,851 1,841 21% \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 24,922 12,352 - 50% 16,564 10,609 64% 8,358 1,743 \u0026gt; 21% ' 24,986 12,644 51% 16,727 10,882 65% 8,259 1,762 - ' 21% 24,886 12,614 51% 16,664 10,825 65% 8,222 1,789 22% 25,070 13,335 53% 16,933 11,507 68% 8.137 1,828 22% 25,190 13,612 54%' 17,097 11,692 68% ,\u0026gt; 8,093 1,920 24%/ 25,525 13,789 - ' 54%y 17,417 11,864 . 68% X 8,108 1,925 \u0026gt; 24% Notes: Row 1 includes tor each school year the total October 1 enrollment. Row 2 includes the total number of students ehgible for free/reduced lunch. Row 3 includes the number of eligible free/reduced lunch students (row 2) divided by the total enrollment (row 1)the percent of the total enrollment that were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program bv rear. Row 4 includes the total number of black students enrolled for each school year, as of October 1. Row 5 includes the number of black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 6 includes the number of black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program (row 3) divided by the total black enrollment (row 4)the percent of the total black enrollment who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 7 includes the total number of non-black students enrolled for each school vear. Row 8 includes the number of non-black students who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 9 includes the number of non-black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program (row 8) divided by tlie total black enrollment for each year (row 7)the percent of the total enrollment of non-black students who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Break-out of Non-Blacks 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 White Hispanic Amer. Ind. Asian Other Total Non-B 1513 125 30 47 126 1841 1413 159 20 70 81 1743 1341 237 44 66 74 1762 1254 I 1258 301 43 66 125 1789 362 22 78 108 1828 1213 437 30 94 146 1920 1109 514 22 106 174 1925April 2 6. 2 0 0 2 i\nLR school lunches to rise by 25 cents ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The price of all meals served to students and adults in the Little Rock School District will increase 25 cents starting next August. The Little Rock School Board approved the new pricing plan Thursday. Elementary school lunches for students will increase for the first time in four years, from $L25 to $1.50. Lunches in ^e middle and high schools will go from $1.50 to $1.75 for students. All adult lunches will go from $2 to $2.25. i-'i--'-X\nJune 24, 2 0 0 5 LR School Board approves increase for student meals ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The price of a school lunch in the Little Rock School District will increase by 50 cents this coming school year, and breakfast prices will increase by 25 cents. The Little Rock School Board approved the increases Thursday on the recommendation of district staff who cited costs  including a 10 percent increase in labor costs this past year  as the reason for the price change. The districts Child Nutrition Department is self -supporting. The last increase in meal prices occurred in the 2002-03 school year. Student lunches will increase to $2 per student at the elementary schools in the 2005- 06 school year and $2.25 at the middle and high schools. Adult lunches will be $2.75. Breakfasts served to both elementary and secondary school students will be $1, and the cost to adults will be $L25. The price increases are expected to generate an additional $340,000 for the school district For the 2004-2005 school year, the district worked with a budget of about $277 million. The School Board for the Pulaski County Special School District earlier this month similarly approved a price increase for school lunches for the 2005- 506 school year from 1.50 to $L75 for students and from $2.50 to $2.75 for adults. Mike Harvey, director of student nutrition in that district, cited increases in the cost of milk and other foods, particularly beef, as well as increased fuel costs as reasons for the price changes. Harvey also cited Act 1220 of 2003, the student nutrition and physical activity act, that resulted in restrictions to the a la carte sales in the cafeterias, costing the district about $100,000. The county district last raised lunch prices in 1998-99. The new increase is expected to generate $250,000 in new income.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1483","title":"\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Standards","Education--Finance","Education--Curricula","School enrollment","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration","Parents","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1483"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["69 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1691","title":"Court filings: District Court, plaintiff Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) answers to the Joshua intervenors' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1997-12-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Joshua Intervenors","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, plaintiff Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) answers to the Joshua intervenors' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1691"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["155 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. vs. LR-C-82-866 PLAINTIFFS :~~~~I COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICTRECEIVED DEFENDANTS MRS . LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEC ~ 1997 OFFICE OF PLAINTIFF LRSD, s AKiii~Ti MONITORING INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING LRSD'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Plaintiff Little Rock School District ( \"LRSD\") for its Answers to The Joshua Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents states: INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please state the name, title, address and telephone number of each and every individual assisting in the preparation of the answers to these interrogatories. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory requests information which is privileged under the work product doctrine and/or the attorney-client privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the following persons assisted in the preparation of these answers: Dr. Les Carnine, Christopher Heller and John c. Fendley, Jr. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: In 15 instances in paragraphs II. B. through II. P. of the proposed new plan, the words \"LRSD shall implement programs policies and/or procedures\" followed by a particular subject matter appear. Please identify separately for l:lhomollct'd lcy\\lrod'dco-joob.ra  ' . each of these 15 paragraphs all programs, policies and procedures - which you maintain are currently implemented and are intended to be encompassed by the reference in the particular subparagraph of Part II. of the proposed plan. In addition, please specify when the implementation of the particular program, policy or procedure began. Lastly, as to each sub-paragraph, please indicate whether work is underway to develop a particular program, policy or procedure to implement the obligation and, if so, describe generally the nature of the initiative(s) and the anticipated completion date(s). ANSWER: Except as otherwise provided in LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\"), the obligations set forth in Section II were not intended to encompass any particular program, policy and procedure currently being implemented. As stated in Section XI of the Revised Plan, the 1997-98 school year will be a transition year in preparation for implementation of the Revised Plan during the 1998-99 school year. During the transition year, LRSD will be evaluating current programs, policies and procedures and developing new programs, policies and procedures to be implemented in order to meet its obligations under the Revised Plan. Some of this work has already been completed and is contained in the work team reports submitted to the LRSD Board of Directors in August of this year. INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Please explain the reason(s) that the proposed plan does not include in the 15 instances referred to in Interrogatory No. 2, or in any instance, the identification of the l:lh:\u003en-cllcndlcylll'ld'doo-jooh.,.. 2 particular programs, policies and procedures to be implemented. (If LRSD believes that there is identification of a particular standard in one or more instances, please answer as to obligations where you agree that there is no identification of a particular standard or program). ANSWER: The Revised Plan includes specific programs, policies and/or procedures with regard to student assignments (Section III \u0026 IV), African-American academic achievement (Section V), equitable allocation of certified personnel (Section VI) and compliance (Section VII). With regard to the remaining obligations, LRSD believes that, in order for the Revised Plan to be successful, the details related to implementation of the Revised Plan must be subject to modification without district court involvement. LRSD firmly believes that flexibility is essential to instilling in the - qistrict a sense of responsibility and accountability. INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Would the system refuse to support adoption of the revised plan if the plan included the identification of particular programs, policies and/or procedures, or other steps, to implement the \"obligations\" identified in Part II? If so, explain the reason(s) for the system's pos i tion. ANSWER: The Revised Plan does identify particular programs, policies and/or procedures. See Answer to Interrogatory No. 3. INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Do you agree that as written, there would be compliance with the provisions of II.B. through II.P. of the proposed plan if the system implemented, as to the particular sub-paragraph, programs or policies or procedures regarding the r:lhom,lr\u003cndlcyllr\u003e\u003cl'dca-jah.ra 3 particular matter addressed in the paragraph. If the answer is negative, please explain the basis for the answer. ANSWER: Yes. INTERROGATORY NO. 6: As the plan is written, would the court have the authority, in the opinion of the LRSD, to hold a system official (s) (sic] in contempt of court for failure to implement a term of a particular policy of the district, which the LRSD views as encompassed by one of the sub-paragraphs in II.B. through II.P. of the plan, but which is not specified in the plan. If your answer is in the affirmative, please explain the basis for the answer. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory calls for the legal opinion of counsel for LRSD which is privileged under the attorneyclient privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the district court would have authority to enforce the Revised Plan using its contempt power. INTERROGATORY NO. 7: As the plan is written, does any provision of paragraphs II.B. through II.P. of the plan require any action on the part of the LRSD if at a particular school there is substantial racial disparity, atypical in the LRSD system, in the numbers of black students suspended, the numbers of black males placed in special education classes, or the numbers of black students in the gifted and talented program. If the answer is affirmative, please identify the provision(s) which is the basis of the answer. (:\\homolfcndlcyllndldoojooh.,.. 4 ANSWER: Paragraphs G., H. and I. of Section II state LRSD's obligations with regard to special education, student discipline and gifted and talented, respectively. Compliance with these paragraphs would require LRSD to investigate a racial disparity which varies substantially from what would be expected. INTERROGATORY NO. 8: Do you maintain that the .LRSD complies, currently, with each obligation set forth in Part II. of the plan. If not, please describe in detail the area(s) of noncompliance. ANSWER: The obligations set forth in Section II encompass the core obligations from LRSD' s current desegregation plan. LRSD maintains that it has substantially complied with its current desegregation plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 9: With respect to II.B. of the proposed plan, please identify as to each category of positions to which it applies, the proportion black in the relevant labor market and the source of this information, and the proportion black of the work force at present. ANSWER: LRSD intends to rely on federal EEOC statistics for Pulaski County, the State of Arkansas and the nation as a whole to determine the percentage of qualified African-Americans in the relevant labor market. With regard to the proportion of AfricanAmerican teachers and administrators, see Exhibits A, B and C attached. LRSD' s noncertified personnel is 73. 8% African-American. INTERROGATORY NO. 10: With respect to II.C. of the proposed plan, please identify as to each category of positions to which it applies, the meaning of the words \"the pool of candidates eligible f:lhomolfcndlcyllnd'dc.-jc,oh.1W 5 for promotion\", the proportion black in that pool and the source of the information, and the proportion black of the persons employed in the category at present. ANSWER: The \"pool of candidates eligible for promotion\" includes current employees who satisfy all eligibility requirements imposed by law or by the Board for a position. LRSD objects to identifying every position for which every employee is currently eligible for promotion as unduly burdensome. With regard to the percentage of African-Americans currently employed by LRSD, see Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. INTERROGATORY NO. 11: With respect to II.D. of the proposed plan, please identify the positions covered within the term \"certified personnel\" and provide as to each category the number of persons currently employed in the LRSD by race. ANSWER: \"Certified personnel\" are LRSD employees who must possess teaching or administrative certificates issued by the State of Arkansas in order to hold their position. With regard to the percentage of African-Americans currently employed by LRSD, see Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. INTERROGATORY NO. 12: With respect to II.E. of the proposed plan, please identify any category of certified personnel where the LRSD does not have the right to assign personnel for the good of the system and the basis of the limitation. ANSWER: See Articles XV through XVIII of the PN Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act. r:lhomellcndlcyUrld'da-jooh.,a 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I INTERROGATORY NO. 13: With respect to II.H. of the proposed plan, please describe in detail any specific initiative(s) in the LRSD at present, whether involving particular personnel, or standards, designed to guard against black students' receiving discipline for conduct for which white students are not disciplined, black students' receiving discipline for trivial matters, and/or black students' receiving more severe discipline than white students for similar conduct. ANSWER: LRSD expects all of its students, regardless of race or socioeconomic background, to comply with the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. If a student fails to comply, the student will be disciplined as provided in the Handbook. Discipline information including the race of the student, the race of the administrator, the nature of the offense and the sanction imposed is compiled by the schools and maintained by LRSD. LRSD's Associate Superintendent for Student Discipline reviews this information in an attempt to identify possible racial discrimination. INTERROGATORY NO. 14: With respect to II.I. of the proposed plan, please define, with specificity, the word \"qualified,\" as it applies to each of the three areas discussed in the obligation, namely \"extracurricular activities\", \"advanced placement courses\", and \"gifted and talented\" programs. ANSWER: The phrase \"qualified African-American students\" means African-American students who satisfy the eligibility criteria for an activity or program. For many activities and (:\\hoorcll'endlcyll..dldoo-jolh.ra 7 programs, there are eligibility criteria other than student interest. INTERROGATORY NO. 15: With respect to II.J. of the proposed plan, does LRSD agree that as written the system would be in compliance with this provision if the system continued to implement any two programs with its federal Title I monies to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. If not, lease (sic) explain the basis for the disagreement. ANSWER: No. LRSD must also implement the programs, policies and/or procedures set forth in Section V of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 16: With respect to II.L. of the proposed plan, please define the terms \"equitable allocation,\" \"technological resources,\" and \"educational resources.\" Also, please identify any data source allowing a determination of whether these resources are equitably allocated to LRSD schools at present. ANSWER: The phrase \"equitable allocation\" means to allocate based on need and without bias or favoritism. The term \"technological resources\" means up-to-date computer and information technology. The term \"educational resources'' includes teachers, teacher aides, equipment and supplies. With regard to a data source for determing whether these resources are currently equitably allocated, see the technology work team report, the individual school profiles and the LRSD budget. INTERROGATORY NO. 17: With respect to II.M. of the proposed plan, please define the term \"equitable\" and identify the matters encompassed in the terms \"maintenance and repair.\" In addition, /:lhomo,1/crdlcylltod'doo-jch.,.. 8 please identify any source of data available to ascertain compliance with this obligation on a school-by-school basis. ANSWER: The term \"equitable\" means based on need and without bias or favoritism. The terms \"maintenance and repair\" include the routine upkeep of the building and grounds and the repair or replacement of elements of the building and grounds which are no longer functional. LRSD maintains records which would indicate maintenance requests submitted by schools, the priority assigned to those requests and when and if those requests were acted upon. INTERROGATORY NO. 18: With respect to II.N. of the proposed plan, please identify any specific initiatives currently undertaken in the LRSD to ascertain whether or not guidance or counseling services provided to African-American students involve steering to a restricted range of courses and/or postsecondary educational opportunities. ANSWER: LRSD recognizes that African-American students are underrepresented in upper-level courses and has implemented strategies to address that issue. Specifically with regard to guidance and counseling services, LRSD has requested a National Science Foundation grant to fund training modeled after TESA and EQUALS to assist counselors in motivating African-American students to take the courses necessary to later be successful in upper-level science and math courses. INTERROGATORY NO. 19: With respect to II.O. of the proposed plan, does LRSD maintain that this subparagraph adds anything to r:\"\"'-lfcndley~r,d\\deo-jcoh.ra 9 other obligations of the plan. If so, please describe with specificity what it adds. ANSWER: Yes. The obligations in Section II should be interpreted consistent with Paragraph 0. INTERROGATORY NO. 20: With respect to II. P. of the proposed plan, please set forth the number of persons the LRSD plans to assign on a full-time basis to compliance/monitoring activities and the categories of positions to be staffed. In addition, please describe any steps to insure that the make-up of the staff includes a substantial number of African-American persons and any role which LRSD is willing to give the representative of the Joshua Intervenors in the selection of this staff. ANSWER: These decisions have not yet been made. INTERROGATORY NO. 21: With respect to III. A. 1. of the proposed plan, please identify any document and any existing analysis stored in any other manner projecting school make-up by race if the steps described in this subparagraph are implemented. If any such data does not currently exist, please describe how such a projection could be done with data and resources available to the LRSD. ANSWER: LRSD is currently working with Edulog software to project school make-up under scenarios consistent with Section III of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 22: With respect to III.B. I . -5 of the proposed plan, please: (i) identify all written standards governing these transfers and (ii) describe any unwritten practices governing l:ll,anollcndlcy\\Jnd'du-jooh.,a 10 one or more of these transfers. (iii) In addition, please define the concepts of \"capacity limitations\" and \"reasonable requirement\" identifying any designations of schools capacities to be utilized. (iv) In addition, please explain the language \"a special need arising out of circumstances unique to a particular student\" by reference to the circumstances of youth receiving such transfers in 1997-98 and explain who does and who would decide that the requisite circumstances exist. (v) Lastly, please identify the numbers of students by race utilizing each category of such transfers in 1997-98. ANSWER: (i) No additional standards have been developed beyond what is contain in the Revised Plan. (ii) None. (iii) A school's capacity is a function of the physical plant and the educational programs being implemented at a school . At this time, LRSD is using the school capacity numbers attached hereto as Exhibit E. The \"reasonable requirements\" described in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of Section III.B. relate to procedural requirements which may be imposed by LRSD to ensure that student assignment occurs in a timely and efficient manner. (iv) Special circumstances transfers as described by the Revised Plan are currently handled through an appeals committee composed of five members with individual members selected by the LRSD Board of Directors, the Biracial Committee, the PTA Council r:lhomo\\fendlcyUnod'dc.-jooh.,a 11 and the Little Rock CTA. The committee reviews requests for transfers based on geographic isolation, racial isolation, medical hardship and other extenuating circumstances. This committee was established by the Tri-District plan and has been continued by LRSD under its current plan. (v) Records concerning transfers will be made available upon request at a time and date mutually agreed to by counsel. INTERROGATORY NO. 23: With respect to III. E. of the proposed plan, please identify any potential sites for the school in west Little Rock, including any sites set forth in any study. In addition, please state whether the LRSD envisions the court's approving the site prior to its final approval. ANSWER: No potential site has been identified. Although LRSD anticipates keeping both the court and the parties informed about the site selection process, the site would not have to be approved by the court except as provided in Section IX.B. of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 24: With respect to IV.E. of the proposed plan, please describe any existing agreements, standards, and practices relating to cooperative efforts of the LRSD and PCSSD. ANSWER: See Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 25: With respect to V.B. and C. of the proposed plan, please (i) identify the author or authors of the provisions, committees and entities, designating the provision or provisions associated with each such author; ( ii) identify any document(s) providing further explanation of any provision(s) of f:lhomo\\fcndlcyllrod\\doo-jooh.,_ 12 the proposal; (iii) regarding parts B.l.a., B.2.a., and B.3.a., please identify any standards describing the level of competency envisioned in each instance and how it would be assessed; is developing the standards and the general timelines for that effort; and (iv) regarding these three parts of the plan, please state whether LRSD plans to have students satisfy a test requirement prior to moving to the next grade; if the matter is not decided, but such a requirement remains an option, please indicate. ANSWER: See curriculum work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 26: With respect to V.C.4. of the proposed plan, what is the reason for evaluating Algebra I placement procedures and what would be done with the evaluation results. ANSWER: See curriculum work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 27: With respect to V.D. of the proposed plan, please identify any standards for use of the \"additional funding.\" If none currently exist, how would standards be developed and in what time period. Lastly, what is the position of the LRSD regarding the use of some funds to pay area college students to tutor in these schools, during and outside the regular school day, on a one-to-one basis. ANSWER: See incentive school work team report and incentive school individual school plans. LRSD has not taken a position on the use of some funds to pay area college students to tutor in the incentive schools. INTERROGATORY NO. 28 : With respect to V.F. of the proposed plan, please identify any standards for this effort and provide a (:lhonwlfcrdlcyUtwd'-\"jcoh.- 13 definition of the language \"parental and community relations linkage system.\" ANSWER: See community links work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 29: With respect to V.I. of the proposed plan, please explain why the title and the first paragraph apply to teachers and the next two paragraphs apply to certified personnel. As to V.B., what person or persons would decide when the desegregative impact would be outweighed. ANSWER: All of Section VI applies to certified personnel. The superintendent or his designee would decide when the desegregative impact would be outweighed by the educational benefit from allowing a teacher to remain in his or her present assignment or to transfer to another assignment. INTERROGATORY NO. 3 0: With respect to Part VII. of the proposed plan, please identify all documents alluded to in this part, including but not limited to \"compliance standards and procedures\", and/or further explanatory of the meaning of this part. ANSWER: The compliance standards and procedures have not yet been developed. Section VII is based on the requirements for an effective corporate integrity program under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines 8Al.2. INTERROGATORY NO. 31: What if any impact would the court's approval of the proposed plan, or a modified version, have on the life of the agreement which LRSD maintains was made regarding fee payments to counsel for the Joshua Intervenors after the payment of (:lhomo\\lcrdlcyllnd'da,-jo,11.,_ 14 the amount described in the Settlement Agreement. If the LRSD view is that the agreement would continue in force, please set forth the terms of the agreement on which LRSD relies and explain how the agreement could continue in view of the terms of the agreement asserted by the LRSD. ANSWER: The fee agreement was part of the settlement agreement which is not being modified by the Revised Plan. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Please provide a copy of each document which you have identified in responding to interrogatories numbered 2 through 30. RESPONSE: LRSD will make the documents identified herein available for inspection upon request at a time and date mutually agreed to by counsel. INTERROGATORY NO. 32: Do you consider these interrogatories and req~est for documents as continuing and agree to supplement your answers as required by the Court's order of October 23, 1997? ANSWER: LRSD will comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the orders of the district court. r:\\homolfc..dlcy\\lr,d\\dao-_jool,.ra 15 VERIFICATION STATE OF ARKANSAS) ) ss. COUNTY OF PULASKI) I, Dr. Leslie V. Carnine, state under oath that I am the Superintendent of the Little Rock School District, that the foregoing answers have been prepared from information gathered from personnel and records of the District, that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I am authorized to execute this document on behalf of the District. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BY:~ DR. LESIEV.CARNINE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a notary public, on this day of December, 1997. r:lhomolfcndl,:yllnodldco-jooh.,.. Christopher J. Heller John C. Fendley, Jr. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3493 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Little Rock School District BY: 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on this 3rd day of December, 1997. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 ~ittle Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 f:'llornolfcndlcyUl'ICl'da-jooll.,.. 17 Elementary Teachers - 1993 , 17 i . 4 t---15--- --25.o ---- -- -1L2% - 18.2% -18.0% 3 Total ---  246 r 434  ...  i .f i IC PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT A Elementary Teachers - 1994 --- -- 18 - --- -- --- . 17 191)% -L5.3% . '---- --  61 . 5 % - -27. 2% - ' 0 Elementary Teachers - 1995 -,_,-----+--.,.,----+---- --------- ------ -- . 0 . 0 Elementary Teachers - 1996 I I ;- -r-- -- 56.3% -- ....... 22. I%- 2 12 4 Elementary Teachers - 1997 3 - -  9 r6   60. o -1 24.2 - 12 : \\  -- 2r- - 46.2% - --1 OA% - Elementary Teachers - 1998 i ! 3 ........... - 51.3% - .. 15.5% -- Secondary Teachers -1993 ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% CENTRAL 21 49 30.0% CLOVERDALE 2 30 6.3% DUNBAR 8 23 25.8% FAIR 7 29 19.4% FOREST HEIGHTS 9 20 31.0% HALL 9 35 20.5% HENDERSON 9 26 25.7% MABELVALE 3 20 13.0% MANNM/S 13 22 37.1% MCCLELLAN 12 24 33.3% PARK.VIEW 9 28 24.3% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 28 12.5% SOUTHWEST 15 15 50.0% 93 Total 125 351 26.3% Secondary Teachers - 1994 ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% CENTRAL 25 48 34.2% CLOVERDALE 5 30 14.3% DUNBAR 8 25 24.2% FAIR 8 28 22.2% FOREST HEIGHTS 9 19 32.1% HALL 10 34 22.7% HENDERSON 8 30 21.1% MABELVALE 6 21 22.2% MANNM/S 13 25 34.2% MCCLELLAN 12 27 30.8% PARKVIEW 11 28 28.2% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 29 12.1% SOUTHWEST 15 15 50.0% 94 Total 138 361 27.6% 40.4% 3.7% -20.0% -.5% -6.8% 4.8% -5.8% -.5% -13.2% 10.9% 7.1% -1.9% -13.8% 23.7% er;- -~=~ ... ;J~mlg,\u0026;? ',~zj~g,~~ 39.0% 6.6% -13.4% -3.4% -5.4% 4.5% -4.9% -6.6% -5.4% 6.6% 3.1% .5% -15.5% 22.3% PLAINTIFF'S 1 EXHIBIT s :5 J Secondary Teachers - 1995 Scn\"o' ~~- '~-~ . - ,._, . ::;;:. , . ..  - .. ---: -  ...,  - ~~ 1:eme..\" r:i-,i ..~... ~ ~ n,_i.c,..a, .i ,,f~ :-.-:..:.P.. ~e,rc\" ent,a_.g e , ' . . -  , ~- , . . . ~.  .-~-- -.: -~:~1:-.-- : .r.:. :':\"'=:\" -.::-  .. :- ! .. -  . ~  . ;- -}~- ;..,,f.,.   _; ,  ~ capj ~ ;~~~~~c.AA,:;::,.:~ ~:...: Y.anance ;. ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% 36.0% CENTRAL 24 42 36.4% 5.7% CLOVERDALE 5 24 17.2% -13.4% DUNBAR 10 20 33.3% 2.6% FAIR 13 23 36.1% 5.4% FOREST HEIGHTS 12 19 38.7% 8.0% HALL 10 34 22.7% -8.0% HENDERSON 10 26 27.8% -2.9% MABELVALE 5 21 19.2% -11.5% MANNM/S 10 26 27.8% -2.9% MCCLELLAN 12 24 33.3% 2.6% PARK.VIEW 10 28 26.3% -4.4% PULASKI HEIGHTS 7 29 19.4% -11.2% SOUIBWEST 15 14 51.7% 21.0% 95 Total 147 332 30.7% Secondary Teachers - 1996 s~il~l~l~fillE1~ ~JH~tt~~,r.:i ~~~pt~~!~: ALT LRN ' 4 2 66.7% 33.1% CENTRAL 23 41 35.9% 2.4% CLOVERDALE 11 20 35.5% 2.0% DUNBAR 15 18 45.5% 11.9% FAIR 15 25 37.5% 4.0% FOREST HEIGHTS 12 20 37.5% 4.0% HALL 10 36 21.7% -11.8% HENDERSON 19 20 48.7% 15.2% MABELVALE 5 22 18.5% -15.0% MANNM/S 12 25 32.4% -1.1% MCCLELLAN 10 32 23.8% -9.7% PARK.VIEW 12 29 29.3% -4.3% PULASKI HEIGHTS 6 32 15.8% -17.7% SOUTHWEST 15 13 53.6% 20.0% 96 Total 169 335 33 .5% Secondary Teachers - 1997  ~=ifl ~\"I- m11me'rc'efiliifff ' ..- .. ~Rercenta e, . CENTRAL 24 44 35.3% .4% CLOVERDALE 12 19 38.7% 3.8% DUNBAR 14 21 40.0% 5.1% FAIR 14 20 41.2% 6.3% FOREST HEIGHTS 11 18 37.9% 3.1% HALL 11 33 25.0% -9.9% HEDERSON 17 19 47.2% 12.4% MABELVALE 5 20 20.0% -14.9% MANNM/S 12 25 32.4% -2.4% MCCLELLAN 13 30 30.2% -4.6% PARK.VIEW 14 28 33.3% -1.5% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 35 10.3% -24.6% SOUTHWEST 19 10 65.5% 30.6% 97 Total 174 325 34.9% Secondary Teachers - 1998 . :.:f.i~:~~~~17:(f-;~.;BpiJ .~ --~~:n . caira ' ~- ' ~caw an\"'---.; ~ercefftre.~canl ~ :r.ercen~ge.:. ' Sclioolf:f:~,:t~\".. .~ _,; , aniei ~~-~ ~ :.,.-.:~} ~:~~,~J.;: ~- ; --:~~4t.lm.;i -~-~~~- i~~~.~ ;:i;. ~3:~e;;, ALTLRN ' 2 5 28.6% -7.4% CENTRAL 27 48 36:0% .0% CLOVERDALE 13 19 40.6% 4.6% DUNBAR 17 22 43 .6% 7.6% FAIR 11 23 32.4% -3 .6% FOREST HEIGHTS 14 17 45 .2% 9.2% HALL 11 33 25.0% -11.0% HENDERSON 16 19 45 .7% 9.7% MABELVALE 4 21 16.0% -20.0% MANN MIS 15 23 39.5% 3.5% MCCLELLAN 14 29 32.6% -3.4% PARK.VIEW 16 29 35.6% -.4% PULASKI HEIGHTS 6 31 16.2% -19.8% SOUTHWEST 19 10 65.5% 29.5% 98 Total 185 329 36.0% Central Office Administrators - 1993 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 4 2 Departmental Directors 5 12 93 Total 9 15 Central Office Administrators - 1994 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 3 2 Departmental Directors 5 13 94 Total 9 IS Central Office Administrators - 1995 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 3 3 Departmental Directors 6 14 95 Total 10 17 Central Office Administrators - 1996 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 2 3 Departm,ental Directors 5 13 96 Total 8 16 Central Office Administrators - 1997 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 2 2 Departmental Directors 4 12 97 Total 6 IS 0.0% 66.7% 29.4% 37.5% 100.0% 60.0% 27.8% 37.5% 100.0% 50.0% 30.0% 37.0% 100.0% 40.0% 27.8% 33.3% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 28.6% ~ PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT c,., Central Office Administrators - 1998 Superintendent 0 2 0.0% Assistant Superintendent 2 2 50.0% Departmental Directors 4 10 28.6% 98 Total 6 14 30.0% Principals and Assistant Prlnlclpals -1993 Principals and Assistant Prlnlclpals - 1994 s 8 18 16 52.9% S2 47 S2.So/o Principals and Assistant Priniclpals - 1995 Principals and Assistant Prinlclpals - 1996 r--- -- - ; - :~ . ~:.::-,..1- 11: -11 -~\\:::;:t~: ~~ l~-;''._~::'.i~~i~~;:f.:i!: l L-.ac ~ :-~--~t~(_I~ . - - ~r ~'l.,.t.~~l:~:..!! Elementarv Princioals 17 18 48.6% Elementary Assistant Principals II s 68.8% Secondary Principals 8 6 57.1 o/o Secondary Assistant Principals 20 13 60.6% 96 Total S6 42 53.1 o/o Principals and Assistant Prinicipals - 1997 Secondary Ass 20 16 55.6% 97 Total 57 44 56.4% Principals and Assistant Priniclpals - 1998 11 5 s 9 5 64.3% s 20 16 55 .6% - 98 Total S6 4S 55.4% ARTICLE XV TEACHING ASSIGNMENTS A. The procedure outlined below shall be followed in making teaching assignments: 1. Teaching assignments shall be based upon training, experience, competence, seniority, tenure, and such other factors as would indicate success in the position to be filled. 2. To assure that students are taught by teachers working within their areas of competence, teachers shall not be assigned, except temporarily and for good cause, outside the scope of their teaching certificates of their major or minor field of study. Teachers assigned outside their major or minor fields shall not be penalized on the salary schedule in any way. When requested, the Director of Personnel will make available to the Association a list of teachers assigned outside their major or minor fields.  3. All teaching assignments will be made by the principal or his/her superiors after the following steps are taken: a. Each year all teachers will submit in writing their personal preference for grade level, group and subject assignments, and such preference shall be a factor in making assignments. b. Department Coordinators will be consulted before assignments are made in their departments. 4. Secondary teachers shall not be required to teach more than two (2) subject matter areas with no more than two (2) preparations involved. Basic, regular, and enriched classes shall be considered separate preparations. Exceptions will only be made when it would otherwise be impossible to enroll all students who have registered for a required course. Teachers assigned more than two (2) preparations will be so notified as soon as possible and in no case later than three (3) weeks before the teach ing assignment is to commence. No teacher shall be assigned more than three (3) preparations under any circumstances. 5. Schedules of teachers who are assigned to more than one (I) school shall be arranged so that such teachers shall not be required to engage in an unreasonable amount of interschool travel. 6. The principal shall or should consult with the Building Coordinating Committee in regard to the tentative master schedule for the following year, and all teachers will be given an opportunity to discuss their tentative assignments with the principal if they so request. B. The following procedure shall be used for notifying teachers of their assignments: 1. Returning teachers shall be given written notice of their tentative grade levei, grouping, subject area assignments, building assignments, and room assignments by the end of the current school year. Newly elected teachers shall be given such notic "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1173","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Cloverdale Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","David O. Dodd Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Dunbar Magnet Middle School (Little Rock, Ark.)","J. A. Fair High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fair Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1173"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nCloverdale Junior High, Dodd Elementary, Dunbar Magnet Junior High, Fair High, Fair Park Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCLOVERDALE JR.HIGH  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR REMDL/COMP READING RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 5 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 10 16 7 22 0 0 18.18 29.09 12.73 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 2 32 5 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 55 00 55 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 40.63 100.00 50.00 00 25.00 100.00 50.00 00 100.00 47.27 47.27 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 10 11 0 4 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 40.00 44.00 00 16.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 75.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 84.00 84.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 20 27 7 26 25.00 33.75 8.75 32.50 0 .00 0 .oo 80 80 % BLACK 58.75 58.75 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 97 69 12 1 5 6 190 87.4% 08 110 85 6 5 1 8 215 90.7% 09 101 91 4 8 7 7 218 88.1% Total 308 245 22 14 13 21 623 88.8% 49.4% 39.3% 3.5% 2.2% 2 .1% 3.4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l - CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ABLES F. 1 4 4 1 9 88.9% ALLEN c. 1 45 43 1 1 4 94 93.6% ANDRESS W. 1 53 42 4 4 1 4 108 88.0% BEEBE S. 1 51 40 2 4 1 4 102 89.2% BENNETT A. 1 53 34 7 1 3 2 100 87.0% BENSON J. 1 49 29 3 1 2 84 92.9% GATELY L. 1 55 27 2 1 4 89 92 .1% BOSTIC K. 1 51 42 2 1 3 99 93.9% BURNETTE D. 1 50 47 2 3 4 4 110 88.2% CHAMBERS A. 1 60 12 6 3 1 82 87.8% CRISWELL D. 1 14 5 2 21 90.5% CROSSNO III J. 1 24 31 4 2 1 62 88.7% CROWDER c. 1 1 1 2 100. 0% DAVIS M. 1 51 42 2 4 3 102 91. 2% DOSS G. 1 19 4 3 1 27 85.2% EARNEST A. 1 44 37 4 2 4 91 89.0% LRSD SECONDARY scHooL els ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l ce CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDDINGTON K. 1 53 46 3 1 1 4 108 91. 7% ENOCH L. 1 2 3 5 100.0% GULLETT-SHELN T. 1 46 26 6 3 2 83 86.7% HAMILTON O. 1 47 35 4 2 4 92 89 .1% HARPER G. 1 51 43 3 5 3 4 109 86.2% HARRIS A. 1 31 64 3 1 5 104 91.3% HARRIS s. 1 1 1 100.0% HEARN A. 1 46 37 3 4 4 94 88.3% HERVEY s. 1 1 6 7 100.0% HOOPER B. 1 52 41 1 3 2 5 104 89.4% HUNTS. 1 54 39 4 1 2 4 104 89.4% JEFFERS M. 1 44 48 1 3 4 3 103 89.3% JONES D. 1 51 55 2 4 5 2 119 89.1% JONES K. 1 so 36 7 1 3 2 99 86.9% JONES x. 1 45 49 3 5 4 4 110 85.5% KINSEY T. 1 32 23 1 2 58 94.8% LRSD - CLOVERDALE SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29 . Schoo1: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black KLAIS N. 1 30 26 2 1 1 4 64 87.5% LABATT T. 1 34 33 4 3 2 76 88.2% LAMB C. 1 71 49 3 3 5 4 135 88.9% LEINBACH s. 1 57 44 2 1 1 4 109 92.7% MCFADDEN c. 1 47 47 5 1 2 4 106 88.7% MEDLOCK J. 1 12 5 2 19 89.5% NESMITH E. 1 48 36 2 2 2 90 93.3% NORMAN C. 1 24 4 1 1 1 31 90.3% PATTERSON D. 1 1 1 100.0% PENNINGTON J. 1 48 42 1 3 4 3 101 89 .1% POORE' P. 1 50 42 5 1 2 4 104 88.5% RALEY B. 1 18 3 1 3 25 84.0% RHODES B. 1 44 55 2 2 4 6 113 87.6% RUSH L. 1 48 48 3 4 3 4 110 87.3% SCOTTS. 1 21 24 2 3 2 2  54 83.3% SHUMATE K. 1 45 47 8 1 1 4 106 86.8% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: e CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te~m: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SLOAN D. 1 49 26 7 2 1 6 91 82.4% STARLING L. 1 57 41 4 4 4 1 111 88.3% STEPHENS L. 1 54 40 8 1 1 5 109 86.2% TAYLOR T. 1 35 11 1 47 97.9% VAN PELTS. 1 16 18 1 2 7 7 51 66. 7% WICKLIFFE A. 1 35 23 1 1 1 61 95.1% WILLIAMS B. 1 61 45 6 3 1 1 117 90.6% YOUNG K. 1 38 38 2 4 4 86 88.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 4 0 0 0 0 10 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 31 9 4 0 1 1 46 87.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 7 3 0 0 0 19 84.2% TOTALS 48 23 7 1 1 1 81 87.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 34 36 3 3 0 1 77 90.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 9 1 2 12 83.3% 08 8 1 1 1 11 81.8% 09 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 10 9 2 2 14 9 82.6% 08 13 7 1 1 2 16 8 83.3% 09 27 9 3 1 1 30 11 87.8% MATH 07 12 7 1 2 14 8 86.4% 08 14 7 1 1 1 15 9 87.5% 09 38 15 3 1 2 41 18 89.8% HISTORY /SOC STUDIES 07 9 9 2 11 9 90.0% 08 26 7 1 1 1 28 8 91.7% 09 18 5 4 1 1 22 7 79.3% SCIENCE 07 22 6 1 1 1 24 7 90.3% 08 19 10 1 2 20 12 90.6% 09 25 9 3 1 1 28 11 87.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 .0% Math 1 1 2 4 50.0% Science 2 3 1 6 83.3% Social Studies 1 4 1 6 16.7% Foreign Language 1 1 2 .0% TOTAL 4 4 6 9 23 34.8% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 42 1 43 97.7% 2 1 3 66. 7% Drill Team 18 18 100. 0% 1 1 100.0% Pride Group 20 3 23 87.0% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 6 1 1 8 75.0% 1 1 .0% Choir 17 34 2 2 55 92.7% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 11 1 12 91. 7% 2 2 .0% Volleyball 17 17 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Monitors .0% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% Beta .0% 2 2 100.0% FBLA 21 36 4 1 3 65 87.7% 2 1 3 66.7% FHA 4 10 2 2 18 77.8% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 15 20 1 2 38 92.1% 1 1 .0% Poetry Club .0% .0% Peer-Facilitator 10 10 2 3 2 2 29 69.0% 1 2 3 100.0% Year Book 10 20 1 1 32 93.8% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Newspaper 10 6 16 100.0% 1 1 .0% Girls Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Boys Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Prin.Council 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% SECME 12 18 3 33 90.9% 1 1 2 50.0% NJHS 10 20 2 32 93.8% 1 2 3 .0% BAND 35 12 47 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Golf .0% .0% Soccer .0% .0% Track(Boys) .0% .0% Track(girls) .0% .0% Teach/Tomorrow .0% .0% TOTAL 207 240 11 23 3 8 492 90.9% 11 10 5 11 37 56.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A Honor Roll 7- 17 23 4 8 2 54 74.1% A/B Honor Ro 7- 58 93 11 16 4 7 189 79.9% C/F StofWk 7- .0% Cadet F/Fli 7 .0% Eagle F/Fli 7 .0% TOTAL 75 116 15 24 6 7 243 78.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Biracial Committ P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% 1 100.0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 4 1 WM WF OM 2 1 OF Total 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS .0% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 10 13 8 19 50 46.0% .0% Stud.Recruit.Com 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Windows .0% .0% TOTAL 10 15 8 20 53 47.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 13 TESA 4 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS 13 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 TOTAL 37 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 21 Behavior Mgmt 15 Coop Discipline 13 TOTAL 64 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Student Asst Prg 19 New Futures Ins. 16 Curriculum/L.A. 8 Curriculum/Math 5 Curr/SocialStud. 4 Curr. Science 7 Voe. Ed. Inserv 5 G/T Inserv. 11 Special Ed. Ins 5 Health Ins. 7 Prag Budg.Docum 1 Data Process Ins 2 TOTAL 90 PAGE 1 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 2 1 1 4 2 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 3 0 4 0 1 12 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 33.33 25.00 00 33.33 00 8.33 12 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 58.33 58.33 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 9 2 18 14.29 25.71 5.71 51.43 0 .oo 1 2.86 TOTAL 35 35 % BLACK 40.00 40.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 5 9 7 2 1 0 24 58.3% SP 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 70.0% 01 14 4 11 4 2 0 35 51.4% 02 14 16 4 5 0 1 40 75.0% 03 12 5 2 3 0 0 22 77.3% 04 10 11 4 7 1 1 34 61.8% 05 13 14 5 10 0 0 42 64.3% 06 6 7 2 4 0 0 19 68.4% Total 81 66 38 35 4 2 226 65.0% 35.8% 29.2% 16.8% 15.5% 1.8% .9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BLUE s. 1 4 4 3 1 1 13 61.5% K HARE v. 1 1 5 4 1 11 54.5% 01 MEEKS J. 1 6 3 6 2 1 18 50.0% 01 MITCHELL v. 1 8 1 5 2 1 17 52.9% 01 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 CHAMBERS S. 1 7 9 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 TAYLOR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RAINES A. 1 7 7 2 3 19 73. 7% 02 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 TAYLOR L. 1 12 5 2 3 22 77.3% 04 DILDAY J. 1 6 6 2 2 1 17 70.6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 FLEMING D. 1 4 5 2 5 1 17 52.9% 05 FRAWLEY E. 1 8 7 1 6 22 68.2% 05 GOLDMON Y. 1 5 7 4 4 20 60.0% 05 TAYLOR M. 1 3 3 100.0% 06 TAYLOR M. 1 2 2 .0% 06 RIDDLE B. 1 6 7 2 4 19 68.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded l 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 3 0 0 11 63.6% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 10 1 2 4 0 0 17 64. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 7 2 7 0 0 22 59 .1% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 2 50.0% 01 3 1 4 75.0% 04 1 1 2 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Beta Club .0% .0% Student Council .0% .0% Hall Monitors 5 4 1 4 1 15 60.0% .0% Fire Marshal ls 2 2 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Safety Patrol 3 2 1 6 50.0% 2 2 3 7 28.6% Basketball 15 3 18 83.3% 14 8 22 63.6% Cheerleaders 15 11 1 27 55.6% 15 7 22 68.2% Tiny Tumblers .0% .0% Peer Tutors 5 8 1 6 20 65.0% 8 9 1 2 20 85.0% Peer Helpers 4 6 3 2 15 66.7% .0% Conflict Manager .0% 3 2 2 4 11 45.5% Ambassadors 9 3 4 8 24 50.0% .0% Announcements 6 8 2 4 20 70.0% 14 11 9 2 36 69.4% Just Say No .0% .0% Flag Monitors 6 2 1 1 10 80.0% 5 1 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 55 48 18 39 1 2 163 63.2% 61 24 30 11 126 67.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's 1- 11 7 13 11 1 1 44 40.9% 3.0 1- 22 26 7 14 1 70 68.6% Citizenship K- 28 17 17 22 2 2 88 51.1% Perfect Att. K- 25 19 8 9 1 62 71.0% Acad. Hall K- .0% TOTAL 86 69 45 56 3 5 264 58.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 1 WM WF 1 2 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 4 1 Black 50.0% 25.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 50.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE P.S.T. Committee Sch. Impv. /COE Discipline Comm. BM 1 1 BF 1 2 WM WF 1 3 4 3 OM OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 3 4 3 OM 2 OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Hos pi tali ty 3 3 .0% 1 2 3 33.3% BCC Committee 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Recruitment 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 1 4 25.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Guidance Comm. TOTAL BM 1 3 BF 9 WM WF 2 4 25 OM OF Total % 5 39 Black 20.0% 30.8% BM 1 5 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 8 1 4 25 1 5 40 Black 20.0% 32.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: School Climate Human Relations TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET-Review K-6 12 21 Integrated Curr. 21 21 1 Autism Workshop 3 1 Math Workshop 21 3 1 TOTAL 54 48 1 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Individual Inst. 7 1 Reading Recovery 1 1 1 K-4 Training 5 2 Shurley Method 15 2 1 1 Multi.Intelligen 15 K-Spec.Needs 2 Reading/Economic 3 Early Literacy 6 1 Social Studies 14 Behavior Mgt. 18 18 6 6 TOTAL 53 55 8 10 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Partners in Educ 2 1 Open Ct. Phonics 21 20 1 TOTAL 23 21 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 9 8 6 15 0 1 39 43.59 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.67 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 13 15 11 21 0 1 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 21.31 24.59 18. 03 34.43 00 1. 64 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 12 0 5 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 22.73 54.55 00 22.73 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 100.00 83.33 100.00 00 00 00 00 100.00 100. 00 77.27 77.27 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M  F M F M F 18 27 11 26 21.69 32.53 13.25 31.33 0 .oo 1 1.20 TOTAL 83 83 % BLACK 54.22 54.22 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 78 86 49 41 9 9 272 60.3% 08 72 82 50 42 6 8 260 59.2% 09 70 59 49 52 8 7 245 52. 7% Total 220 227 148 135 23 24 777 57.5% 28.3% 29.2% 19.0% 17.4% 3.0% 3 .1% LRSD. oeDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Texm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADKINS c. 1 30 37 24 20 4 4 119 56.3% AXE. 1 25 35 27 23 4 3 117 51.3% JOHNSON K. 1 9 11 11 9 2 6 48 41. 7% BANKHEAD c. 1 39 54 21 14 3 4 135 68.9% BELL L. 1 22 31 25 14 3 3 98 54 .1% BLACKWELL w. 1 20 28 31 28 2 4 113 42.5% BROWN L. 1 37 17 8 8 5 75 72. 0% BROWN R. 1 55 53 18 15 4 4 149 72. 5% BURGESS R. 1 69 36 4 8 1 2 120 87.5% CARL D. 1 40 46 17 24 7 3 137 62.8% CARR D. 1 30 40 18 15 5 4 112 62.5% CARTER M. 1 23 25 18 20 5 2 93 51.6% POSITION v. 1 2 2 4 .0% CLAYBORN N. 1 41 46 26 22 2 4 141 61. 7% ROBINSON B. 1 47 49 12 4 1 4 117 82.1% DEAN O. 1 48 13 35 6 7 1 110 55.5% LRSD ce DUNBAR INT. L SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNN R. 1 9 9 1 1 2 1 23 78.3% FLYNN T. 1 29 40 22 8 3 3 105 65.7% FORNEROD. 1 17 24 16 11 1 4 73 56.2% GAINES s. 1 38 35 27 30 6 3 139 52.5% GARNER G. 1 28 30 18 20 3 2 101 57.4% HARTL. 1 33 28 29 25 2 117 52 .1% HENDERSON E. 1 32 25 33 30 4 5 129 44.2% HOEY M. 1 24 36 26 38 5 2 131 45.8% JACKSON G. 1 29 51 4 26 1 7 118 67.8% JONES F. 1 26 29 31 31 2 3 122 45 .1% JONES T. 1 49 50 15 8 2 3 127 78.0% LOGAN A. 1 40 27 34 37 4 4 146 45.9% MCDONALD T. 1 2 2 4 3 1 12 33.3% MCLEROY C. 1 45 37 8 3 3 5 101 81. 2% DAVIS B. 1 24 4 3 31 90.3% MUNDY s. 1 44 24 11 3 4 6 92 73.9% LRSD . ceDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MURRAY L. 1 7 18 44 39 5 5 118 21.2% NEWTON K. 1 32 38 13 12 3 3 101 69.3% OLDS A. 1 28 27 22 12 3 3 95 57.9% OSHIRO N. 1 39 47 28 20 2 136 63.2% PEACE P. 1 21 31 16 23 2 93 55.9% RICHARDSON w. 1 29 32 36 36 5 5 143 42. 7% RODGERS c. 1 55 43 19 10 5 1 133 73. 7% SANDERS s. 1 35 38 20 14 2 6 115 63.5% SHAVERS G. 1 31 9 3 43 93.0% SIMPSON R. 1 43 39 10 5 3 5 105 78 .1% SKOTKO F. 1 18 30 24 20 6 3 101 47.5% SLAYDEN M. 1 7 11 17 15 3 1 54 33.3% SMITH M. 1 33 35 7 3 3 2 83 81.9% SMITH s. 1 31 37 30 25 4 2 129 52. 7% STANLEY R. 1 11 20 21 21 4 4 81 38.3% TERRY P. 1 17 29 32 46 3 2 129 35. 7% LRSD ~DUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black UNDERWOOD J. 1 4 4 6 6 20 40.0% WARREN J. 1 24 24 31 29 8 4 120 40.0% WATSON c. 1 27 27 27 25 3 7 116 46.6% WATSON c. 1 28 25 18 25 3 4 103 51.5% WEBB B. 1 27 39 10 21 3 6 106 62.3% WESTERN J. 1 2 8 4 6 20 50.0% WISES. 1 25 31 33 40 3 2 134 41.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 4 1 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 20 6 5 1 0 0 32 81.3% Speech or Language Impaired 8 1 1 0 0 1 11 81.8% TOTALS 33 8 6 1 0 1 49 83. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 44 62 79 89 8 7 289 36.7% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 4 1 5 100. 0% 08 3 1 4 100.0% 09 4 1 1 1 7 71.4% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 13 3 1 14 3 94.1% 08 6 1 4 10 l 63.6% 09 11 10 3 2 14 12 80.8% MATH 07 5 l 1 6 1 85.7% 08 23 6 9 2 1 33 8 70.7% 09 18 5 2 3 1 21 8 79.3% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 7 5 2 9 5 85.7% 08 21 5 5 3 1 27 8 74.3% 09 14 6 1 1 15 7 90.9% SCIENCE 07 13 3 2 1 16 3 84.2% 08 9 2 2 1 12 2 78.6% 09 12 6 1 2 13 8 85.7% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 1 2 4 50.0% Math 1 2 3 .0% Science 1 1 1 3 66.7% Social Studies 1 3 4 25.0% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 3 2 1 8 14 35. 7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ESL CLUB 11 14 25 .0% 1 1 .0% CHEERLEADER 4 9 13 30.8% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% PEER MEDIATION 6 12 4 11 1 1 35 51. 4% 2 2 .0% VOLLEYBALL 18 9 27 66.7% 1 1 2 .0% LOVE 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 16 26 6 16 64 65.6% 1 1 2 50.0% FUTURE BOBCATS 5 5 5 5 20 50.0% 1 1 .0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 5 4 7 1 18 33.3% 1 1 .0% BETA CLUB 11 19 29 42 2 4 107 28.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 5 14 7 7 33 57.6% 1 1 .0% SPANISH CLUB 4 1 9 14 28.6% 1 1 .0% FOOTBALL 49 7 56 87.5% 3 3 100.0% GIRLS BASKETBALL 24 6 30 80.0% 1 1 2 100.0% GOLF TEAM .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black LATIN CLUB 2 3 10 6 1 2 24 20.8% 1 1 .0% GIRL'S TRACK .0% .0% BOY'S TRACK .0% .0% SOCCER .0% .0% TENNIS .0% .0% FHA 12 22 1 5 40 85.0% 1 1 100.0% ART CLUB 2 10 17 1 2 32 6.3% 1 1 .0% FRENCH CLUB 5 16 7 12 1 41 51.2% 1 1 .0% PROBLEM SOLVING 1 3 6 2 12 8.3% 1 1 .0% NEWSPAPER 4 4 5 6 1 20 40.0% 1 1 .0% RADIO CLUB 1 1 12 5 1 20 10.0% 1 1 2 50.0% YOUNG DEMOCRAT 2 8 20 1 31 6.5% 1 1 .0% ODYSSEY OF MIND 1 6 10 2 19 5.3% 3 3 .0% MOCK TRIAL 1 2 5 8 12.5% 1 1 .0% MATHLETES 1 8 6 2 3 20 5.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 5 14 5 10 1 35 54.3% 2 2 .0% BOYS BASKETBALL 12 2 1 15 80.0% 2 2 100.0% PRIN CABINET .0% 1 1 .0% OUTDOOR ED 8 5 7 3 1 2 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Y-TEENS 17 35 1 53 32 .1% 2 2 .0% FCA 11 10 3 1 1 26 80.8% 1 1 2 50.0% MEN OF DUNBAR 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 176 250 149 276 28 33 912 46.7% 9 6 7 25 47 31. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH HONOR/AWARD HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP REGION CHOIR TOTAL GRADE BM 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 9 BF WM WF OM 10/29/97 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE LIBRARY ADVISARY P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 2 2 WM WF 1 1 6 OM OF Total % 11 3 Black 36.4% 66.7% .0% BM 1 11 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 5 2 18 WM WF 1 4 4 4 37 OM 1 OF Total % 1 11 7 70 Black 45.5% 42.9% 41. 4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % TECHNOLOGY COMM SCHOOL IMPROV CO GT COMMITTEE 3 2 2 1 4 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 10 9 7 Black 40.0% 66.7% 42. 9% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 2 OF Total % Black 1 100.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total SCH RECRUITMENT PUPIL SERVICE MAGNET ADVISORY 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 5 12 5 % Black 40.0% 41. 7% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total 2 2 1 5 % Black 40.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 12 16 12 22 62 % Black 45.2% BM 12 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 28 7 46 4 OF Total 1 94 % Black 42.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 18 2 TESA 29 RACE RELATIONS 11 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 8 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 10 7 EDUC. EQUITY 112 6 TOTAL 188 22 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULT. DIVERSITY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 20 14 6 29 1 94 1 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. DOC. OF DISCIP. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: SEC SC I/MATH G/T WORKSHOP SECME LEARNING STYLES VIOLENCE PROVEN SAP FOR LANG ADVSRY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 10 3 44 26 5 3 86 5 PAGE 1  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 8 5 15 1 2 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 7 18 9 26 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 3 34 8 3 1 1 6 1 2 2 1 63 ll.ll 28.57 14.29 41.27 1.59 3.17 63 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 32.35 62.50 66.67 00 00 16.67 00 50.00 100.00 100.00 39.68 39.68 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 11 12 0 8 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 35.48 38.71 00 25.81 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 7 1 1 3 1 3 6 31 00 31 % BLACK 100.00 62.50 100.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 74.19 74.19 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 18 30 9 34 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.15 31.91 9.57 36.17 1.06 2 .13 94 94 % BLACK 51.06 51.06 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% SP 13 6 4 4 0 0 27 70.4% 10 139 93 29 24 0 2 287 80.8% 11 86 99 13 22 4 0 224 82.6% 12 81 102 16 25 1 1 226 81.0% Total 319 300 62 75 5 3 764 81.0% 41.8% 39.3% 8.1% 9.8% .7% .4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL el s ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: '4t FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black PHILLIPS M. 1 2 2 100.0% ANDERSON s. 1 53 35 8 11 1 1 109 80.7% ARMSTRONG J. 1 44 20 6 3 73 87.7% BEYAH R. 1 25 28 5 7 1 66 80.3% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% BOSTIC M. 1 22 37 4 8 3 74 79.7% BOURLAND M. 1 55 46 7 8 1 1 118 85.6% BRAGG A. 1 42 34 9 5 1 2 93 81. 7% BROADNAX w. 1 19 8 27 100. 0% CALLAWAY E. 1 46 48 2 6 1 103 91. 3% POSITION V. 1 3 3 100.0% CLEVELAND K. 1 60 33 11 5 1 110 84.5% BRAGG A. 1 45 38 5 6 1 95 87.4% COOKUS J. 1 43 41 6 7 2 99 84.8% PHILLIPS C. 1 13 7 3 4 27 74.1% DELAMAR C. 1 1 1 1 3 66.7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: lee FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNKLIN S. 1 48 25 9 12 94 77. 7% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% EARLEYWINE S. 1 33 37 6 11 3 90 77.8% ENDERLIN E. 1 36 25 7 4 1 73 83.6% ESKOLA G. 1 38 41 6 8 93 84.9% FELDMAN N. 1 46 58 7 8 119 87.4% GLASSCO B. 1 22 3 2 2 29 86.2% GRAY V. 1 31 32 7 6 1 77 81.8% GRUMMER w. 1 20 55 7 26 4 112 67.0% HALL L. 1 54 55 6 9 1 125 87.2% HARRIS L. 1 48 22 9 3 1 83 84.3% HARTNESS P. 1 20 10 5 35 85.7% HASTINGS M. 1 52 38 6 9 1 106 84.9% HEAVIN C. 1 20 37 1 10 68 83.8% POSITION v. 1 3 2 5 100.0% HOBBS P. 1 14 27 11 21 73 56.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HULLUM B. 1 49 33 6 6 1 95 86.3% JACKSONS. 1 41 36 6 9 92 83. 7% JACOBS A. 1 57 51 8 10 126 85. 7% JAMELL s. 1 11 7 4 4 26 69.2% JAMES M. 1 31 37 4 8 1 81 84.0% JENNINGS c. 1 17 32 8 15 72 68.1% JOHNSON J. 1 32 22 10 8 1 73 74.0% HARRISON T. 1 36 31 7 5 79 84.8% MACON s. 1 29 80 7 9 125 87.2% MAGEE B. 1 43 44 12 15 1 115 75.7% MAYS S. 1 41 44 4 2 91 93.4% MCAFEE R. 1 29 46 7 13 2 97 77.3% POSITION V. 1 3 5 8 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 100.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 .0% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION V. 1 12 3 15 80.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 .0% POSITION v. 1 9 9 100.0% POSITION V. 1 6 3 9 66. 7% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% MOREY D. 1 8 4 3 4 19 63.2% NAHLEN M. 1 27 29 4 10 70 80.0% PALMER R. 1 46 53 11 8 2 1 121 81.8% PICKERING J. 1 24 46 10 17 97 72.2% RAINS M. 1 42 35 10 7 1 95 81.1% RUTHERFORD P. 1 61 39 14 5 119 84.0% WALKER-RI CHAR L. 1 55 49 9 10 1 124 83.9% SCHMITT K. 1 36 32 9 15 92 73.9% POSITION V. 1 10 10 100.0% LRSD e FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION v. 1 7 22 4 9 42 69.0% STEELE M. 1 5 5 15 5 30 33.3% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% TAYLOR T. 1 21 20 1 1 43 95.3% THOMPSON P. 1 29 33 6 7 75 82.7% WAGE M. 1 54 54 8 10 1 1 128 84.4% WALKER s. 1 15 5 10 30 66.7% WILDER R. 1 30 37 10 11 4 92 72. 8% WILLIAMS M. 1 45 43 5 6 99 88.9% WILLIS L. 1 40 21 7 8 1 2 79 77.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 7 7 1 2 0 0 17 82.4% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 33.3% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Other Health Impaired 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 21 6 6 3 0 0 36 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 5 3 3 0 0 25 76.0% Visually Handicapped 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 47 21 15 11 0 0 94 72.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 65 14 13 1 0 123 77. 2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF 10 11 12 8 8 2 2 1 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total Count Black 13 76.9% 10 100.0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: FAIR HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 66 71 31 26 1 3 198 69.2% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 34 21 4 2 38 23 90.2% 11 12 5 4 1 1 17 6 73.9% 12 7 3 7 3 100.0% MATH 10 34 23 4 3 38 26 89 .1% 11 30 29 4 4 1 35 33 86.8% 12 15 10 1 15 11 96.2% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 28 11 3 2 31 13 88.6% 11 21 9 1 2 22 11 90.9% 12 3 1 1 4 1 80.0% SCIENCE 10 13 7 3 2 16 9 80.0% 11 9 5 2 9 7 87.5% 12 4 3 1 4 4 87.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL: STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM English 3 Math 2 Science 1 3 Social Studies 1 1 Foreign Language 1 TOTAL 2 2 8 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OF Total % Black 3 .0% 2 .0% 4 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 .0% 12 16.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Band 20 18 1 39 97.4% 1 1 100. 0% Baseball 5 21 26 19.2% 1 1 .0% Basketball, Boys 47 1 48 97.9% 2 2 100.0% Basketball, Girl 15 5 20 75 .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CCE 13 13 1 27 96.3% 1 1 100.0% Cheerleaders 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 100.0% Choir 8 37 1 7 53 84.9% 1 1 .0% Beta Club 4 22 3 11 40 65.0% 2 2 .0% Career Awareness 10 26 2 6 44 81.8% 2 2 .0% DECA 9 26 2 3 40 87.5% 1 1 100. 0% Drama Club 10 18 4 8 40 70.0% 1 1 100.0% Drill Team 20 20 100.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 37 51 3 8 3 1 103 85.4% 1 2 1 4 25.0% French Club 5 8 3 3 19 68.4% 1 1 .0% Football 50 2 52 96.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 100.0% Golf 2 4 6 .0% 1 1 .0% WOW Sr \u0026amp; Parents 25 37 8 10 1 81 76.5% 1 1 100.0% Journalism 2 4 7 10 23 26.1% 1 1 .0% Ring Staff-Jr 4 13 3 4 1 25 68.0% 1 1 .0% Ladies' Club 35 5 40 87.5% 3 3 100.0% Mu Alpha Theta 3 8 4 2 17 64.7% 1 1 .0% National Honor 10 19 7 9 1 46 63.0% 2 2 .0% Peer Counseling 9 22 5 9 45 68.9% 1 1 100.0% S.E.C.M.E. 17 22 1 5 45 86. 7% 1 1 100.0% Safety Council 6 5 2 2 15 73.3% 1 1 100.0% SAP 49 41 10 13 113 79.6% 1 1 .0% Spanish Club 7 24 2 17 2 1 53 58.5% 2 2 .0% Student Council 6 15 1 4 26 80.8% 1 1 .0% Teach. Tomorrow 13 1 14 92. 9% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Teens For Christ 1 3 36 40 2.5% 1 1 .0% Tennis 1 1 3 3 1 9 22.2% 1 1 .0% Track, Boys 24 24 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Track, Girls 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Volleyball 13 2 15 86. 7% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 .0% Fell. Chr. Ath. 18 1 1 20 90.0% 1 1 .0% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% 1 1 100.0% COE 2 12 1 6 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% Art Club 5 4 5 3 17 52.9% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 432 574 115 217 8 5 1351 74.5% 12 13 14 17 56 44.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Business Advisor 1 2 1 4 25.0% 1 2 3 3 9 33.3% CCE Advisory 1 1 100.0% 7 2 4 13 69.2% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Clear Sch Purpos 1 5 2 5 13 46.2% Discipline 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% Parent/Comm 1 2 2 5 10 30.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM Student Ach Time on Task Marketing BF 2 3 4 1 WM 1 2 WF 4 5 OM OF Total % 10 11 Black 50.0% 36.4% 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 1 1 4 OF Total % 3 Black .0% .0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 6 22 13 29 OM OF Total % Black 70 40.0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 8 9 8 34 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 12 2 TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS 8 5 HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 10 17 TOTAL 43 24 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 11 9 25 1 69 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 22 26 48 15 15 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Learn Strategies Viol Prevention GT Learn Styles TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 2 3 1 25 31 36 1 37 PAGE 1 FAIR PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 2 7 1 10 0 0 10.00 35.00 5.00 50.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 38.46 00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 45.00 45.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 7 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.75 43.75 00 37.50 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 3 16 00 16 % BLACK 66.67 100.00 100.00 00 00 60.00 66.67 62.50 62.50 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 14 1 16 13.89 38.89 2.78 44.44 0 .oo 0 .oo 36 36 % BLACK 52.78 52.78 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 17 3 3 0 0 38 84.2% P4 5 12 4 12 0 3 36 47.2% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 11 24 4 5 1 0 45 77.8% 02 13 12 2 1 2 1 31 80.6% 03 18 11 4 1 0 0 34 85.3% 04 7 8 3 1 0 0 19 78.9% 05 8 9 2 4 0 0 23 73.9% 06 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% Total 84 107 23 29 5 5 253 75.5% 33.2% 42.3% 9.1% 11.5% 2.0% 2.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POWELL R. 1 1 1 .0% K BROWN R. 1 7 9 1 2 19 84.2% K LEWIS L. 1 7 8 2 1 18 83.3% P4 COTHRAN D. 1 2 6 2 6 2 18 44.4% P4 PUSCH L. 1 3 6 2 6 1 18 50.0% 01 DELOZIER M. 1 6 12 2 1 1 22 81. 8% 01 POWELL R. 1 5 12 2 3 22 77.3% 02 CORBIN B. 1 5 3 1 9 88.9% 02 JAMES C. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RICE O. 1 7 9 2 1 2 21 76.2% 03 CORBIN B. 1 5 4 9 100.0% 03 TURNER M. 1 13 7 4 1 25 80.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 04 05 06 JAMES C. SHERWOOD S. CARTER C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 7 8 3 1 19 78.9% 8 9 2 3 22 77.3% 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 1 2 1 0 1 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 6 2 2 0 2 0 12 66.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 9 4 4 0 0 23 65.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 03 3 BF 2 1 WM WF OM OF Total % 1 Count Black 3 100.0% 2 100.0% 1 . 0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 2 50.0% Fire Marshal ls .0% .0% Student Council .0% 1 1 100.0% Peer Helpers .0% .0% Preschool Helper .0% .0% BASKETBALL 13 2 1 16 81.3% 2 2 100.0% CHEERLEADERS 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100. 0% AMBASSADORS 7 7 3 4 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% RECORDER GROUP 13 13 2 2 1 31 83.9% 1 1 100.0% CAMBIATA SINGERS 4 14 3 4 25 72 .0% .0% TOTAL 47 34 10 12 3 106 76.4% 3 3 2 8 75.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF \"A\"HONOR ROL \"B\"HONOR ROL \"AB\" HONOR CITIZENSHIP STU OF MONTH 4 5 3 TOTAL 4 5 3 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% 1 13 69.2% 1 13 69.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM 1 1 BF 1 WM WF 2 2 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black 33.3% 50.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 4 7 Black 50.0% 42.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Teacher Morale BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Student Handbook Science Fair Field Day BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Halloween Carniv Intl. Bazaar Grant Writing BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Com. PIE BCC BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .oi 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Discipline Student Council Journalism Newsp BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 6 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Pupil Serv. Team Guidance TOTAL BM BF 2 WM WF OM 1 4 OF Total 7 % Black .0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 1 4 2 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black .0% .0% 45.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP. CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Whole Language Multi Curriculum Computer Windows On Scien Reading RECOVERY K-4 CRUSADE TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1 6 7 PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1155","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Badgett Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Hardin Bale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Baseline Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Booker T. Washington Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Brady Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Carver Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Central High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Chicot Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Cloverdale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Students","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1155"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nBadgett Elementary, Bale Elementary, Baseline Elementary, Booker Elementary, Brady Elementary, Carver Elementary, Central High, Chicot Elementary, Cloverdale Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nPOSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 10 0 9 0 0 5.00 50.00 00 45.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 54.55 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 55.00 55.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 9 0 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 26.67 60.00 00 13 .33 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 15 00 15 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.67 86.67 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 19 0 11 14.29 54.29 .oo 31.43 0 .oo 0 .oo 35 35 % BLACK 68.57 68.57 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 20 4 1 0 0 40 87.5% P4 13 21 0 2 0 0 36 94.4% SP 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 100.0% 01 18 15 0 1 0 0 34 97 .1% 02 17 12 0 2 0 0 31 93.5% 03 12 9 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 04 9 7 3 3 0 0 22 72. 7% 05 10 11 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 06 13 10 0 0 0 0 23 100.0% Total 113 107 7 11 0 0 238 92.4% 47.5% 45.0% 2.9% 4.6% .0% .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K PHILLIPS T. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% K WILLIS C. 1 8 11 1 20 95.0% P4 GADDY G. 1 7 10 17 100.0% P4 TRAYLOR K. 1 6 11 2 19 89.5% 01 BROOKS D. 1 8 6 1 15 93.3% 01 MCGOWAN D. 1 10 8 18 100.0% 02 MCLENNAN A. 1 9 6 2 17 88.2% 02 SINGER P. 1 8 6 14 100.0% 03 CAMPBELL E. 1 12 9 1 22 95.5% 04 HESSELBEIN A. 1 8 7 3 3 21 71.4% 04 PRUITT G. 1 1 1 2 100.0% 05 ALBERT R. 1 10 11 1 22 95.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 05 06 06 PRUITT G. PRUITT G. TRIMBLE 8. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 3 2 13 BF 1 10 WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 23 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% TOTALS 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 3 1 2 0 0 12 75.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 2 8 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100.0% AMBASSADORS 2 8 2 1 13 76.9% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 3 4 1 3 11 63.6% 1 1 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 4 3 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 100.0% LIBRARY MONITORS 2 5 1 8 87.5% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 4 3 2 9 77. 8% 1 1 100.0% FIRE MARSHALLS 2 1 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 19 32 8 10 69 73.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black CITZ OF WEEK K .0% CITZ OF WEEK 1 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 2 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 3 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 4 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 5 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 6 .0% HONOR ROLL K .0% HONOR ROLL 1 .0% - HONOR ROLL 2 .0% HONOR ROLL 3 .0% HONOR ROLL 4 .0% HONOR ROLL 5 .0% HONOR ROLL 6 .0% HONOR ROLL SC .0% PERFT ATTEND K .0% PERFT ATTEND 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 2 3 4 5 6 SC 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% HANDBOOK 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% RECRUITMENT 1 2 3 6 50.0% 2 3 1 6 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 16 18 OM OF Total % Black 35 48.6% BM 3 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 5 7 24 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA PET HUMAN RELATIONS COOP. LEARNING. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 7 9 16 6 45 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CULTURAL RELAT MULTICUL CURR. TOTAL 2 3 5 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 8 CONFLICT MGMT. 5 TOTAL 28 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK TOTAL 6 6 PAGE 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE POSITION BL A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 5 1 11 0 0 17 29.41 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 6 2 22 0 0 30 20.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 20.00 6.67 73.33 00 00 30 20.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 19.05 52.38 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 3 1 1 1 9 2 21 00 21 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 00 88.89 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 4 17 2 28 7.84 33.33 3.92 54.90 0 .00 0 .oo 51 51 % BLACK 41.18 41.18 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 20 5 4 4 0 52 75.0% P4 7 10 6 3 8 2 36 47.2% SP 3 2 1 0 0 0 6 83.3% 01 14 25 6 0 2 2 49 79.6% 02 19 19 4 4 1 1 48 79.2% 03 15 18 3 3 1 1 41 80.5% 04 17 16 4 4 0 0 41 80.5% 05 19 14 8 8 1 2 52 63.5% 06 19 14 1 2 2 0 38 86.8% Total 132 138 38 28 19 8 363 74.4% 36.4% 38.0% 10.5% 7.7% 5.2% 2.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% K HUTTO M. 1 6 6 2 1 2 17 70.6% K LITTELL T. 1 7 7 3 17 82.4% K SEILER D. 1 1 1 100. 0% K SHUTE K. 1 6 6 3 2 17 70.6% P4 GEURIN R. 1 4 5 3 2 3 1 18 50.0% P4 JOHNSON c. 1 3 5 3 1 5 1 18 44 .4% 01 BALENKO M. 1 7 13 3 1 1 25 80.0% 01 BROWN C. 1 7 12 3 1 1 24 79.2% 02 CONLEY F. 1 10 9 1 2 1 1 24 79.2% 02 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 TALLEY H. 1 9 10 3 1 23 82.6% 03 CUNNINGHAM L. 1 8 8 2 2 1 21 76.2% 03 FUNK P. 1 7 10 1 1 1 20 85.0% 03 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 FRANCIS L. 1 10 7 1 2 20 85.0% 04 UNDERWOOD-MOR L. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% 04 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 DOCKERY M. 1 10 6 4 4 1 25 64.0% 05 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TARKINGTON R. 1 9 7 4 3 2 25 64.0% 06 NELSON J. 1 10 8 2 20 90.0% 06 ROSBY K. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 06 SEILER D. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 33.3% Specific Learning Disability 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 8 4 5 4 0 0 21 57.1% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 14 7 10 6 0 0 37 56.8% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 14 12 3 5 1 1 36 72.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 20 16 4 6 1 3 50 72. 0% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Tutors 3 8 1 2 1 1 16 68.8% 1 1 100.0% Conflict Manager 11 4 1 2 18 83.3% 1 1 100.0% Sign-a-Thon 1 1 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 - H 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% HOST \u0026amp; HOSTESSES 11 8 1 4 24 79.2% 1 1 100.0% RECORDER .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 47 39 8 20 2 4 120 71. 7% 6 3 9 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERF ATT pERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's HIGHEST ACA GRADE BM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN SUNSHINE SUNSHINE CITIZENSHI,P GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE MOST IMPR LIFE PRIN AW TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 3 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR G/T BM BF WM WF 1 2 1 1 1 2 OM OF Total 2 3 3 % Black 50.0% 66. 7% .0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 4 1 2 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 8 % Black 50.0% 62.5% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCHOOL IMPROV CO RECRUITMENT COMM DISCIPLINE HEAR! 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 3 3 Black 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 WM WF 1 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 3 5 Black 66.7% 60.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TITLE I PLANNING EMERGENCY CRISIS GREAT EXPECTATIO BM BF WM WF 2 2 2 6 3 5 OM OF Total % Black 8 25.0% 5 40.0% 7 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC BLACK HISTORY PUPIL SERVICE TE BM BF 1 3 2 WM WF 2 1 5 OM OF Total 3 4 7 % Black 33.3% 75.0% 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARTNERS IN EDUC 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 100.0% MEMBERSHIP 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% ROOM MOTHERS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PTA COUNCIL 1 1 100.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% HOSPITALITY 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 100. 0% TOTAL 25 2 35 62 40.3% 4 15 3 8 30 63.3% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 5 5 TESA 9 RACE RELATIONS 5 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 38 5 1 CULTURAL RELAT. 2 AT RISK 16 PRESCHOOL INSERV 22 OPEN COURT 24 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 18 2 14 TOTAL 103 64 17 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 12 CYCLE 1 5 CYCLE 2 2 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 1 1 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 NEW BRIDGE 28 TRAINER OF TRAIN 2 CURR COMPACTING 1 TRI-D GIT 1 ADADE COMP/ENRI 1 NATL FACU INSTIT 3 CRITICAL/CREATI 1 Reading/Spelling 24 TOTAL 62 24 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 5 CLASSROOM MGMT. 20 1 POS CLASS MGMT 14 VIOLENCE PREVEN 1 MANAGER CONFLICT 1 STRESS MANAGEMEN 28 CLASSROOM MODIF 23 PS GRADES 1-6 12 PS SUPPORT STAFF 11 COOP TEAM LEARN 1 SP ED DISCIPLINE 1 PLAYGRD DISC TOTAL 117 1 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 2 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-..97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LEARN DISABIL 26 2 GANGS 26 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 26 LEARNING STYLES 26 SELF ESTEEM/ELE 16 MOTIVATION 28 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 33 3 READING/METRA 15 BEGIN YEAR STAFF 24 24 4 10 FRIST AID 4 1 PS K-12 INSTR A 7 2 ABACUS 27 2 LR-CDA TRAINING 2 G/E SP.EDU 22 INSTRU AIDES 4YR 2 2 INCLUSION (K) 3 SHURLEY 8 TEST DATA 15 New Teacher Trai 2 Marva Collins Se 5 TOTAL 242 116 19 18 BASELINE POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 9 1 8 0 0 18 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 15 2 12 0 0 29 51. 72 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 51.72 6.90 41.38 00 00 29 51. 72  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100. 00 MEDIA CLERK 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SECRETARY 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 1 9 0 0 0 0 10 100.00 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 16 0 3 0 1 23 82.61 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13.04 69.57 00 13 .04 00 4.35 23 82.61  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 3 31 2 15 5.77 59.62 3.85 28.85 0 .oo 1 1. 92 52 52 65.38 65.38   01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 28 0 5 3 1 54 83.3% P4 11 16 4 2 1 1 35 77 .1% SP 2 4 1 0 1 0 8 75.0% 01 25 19 3 4 3 1 55 80.0% 02 16 16 1 2 0 1 36 88.9% 03 17 23 0 5 3 1 49 81.6% 04 14 7 3 2 0 0 26 80.8% 05 17 11 4 2 0 2 36 77.8% 06 15 13 0 1 1 0 30 93.3% Total 134 137 16 23 12 7 329 82.4% 40.7% 41. 6% 4.9% 7.0% 3.6% 2.1%  01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K CLEVENGER s. 1 5 7 12 100.0% K JAMES M. 1 5 5 3 1 1 15 66.7% K LOVE B. 1 3 7 1 l 12 83.3% K SELF E. 1 4 8 1 1 14 85.7% P4 HILL D. 1 6 8 2 1 17 82.4% P4 SMITH M. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% 01 BELIN P. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 01 DEATON B. 1 10 7 2 1 20 85.0% 01 GARNER D. 1 7 5 3 1 1 17 70.6% 01 LAMB A. 1 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 02 BELIN P. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 02 SHARP c. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 THOMAS B. 1 8 9 1 18 94.4% 03 GLASON D. 1 8 12 2 2 1 25 80.0% 03 GRIMM B. 1 9 11 3 1 24 83.3% 04 BELIN P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 HUFFMAN C. 1 14 7 3 2 26 80.8% 05 HOOVER P. 1 8 6 2 1 1 18 77.8% 05 TATUM V. 1 9 5 2 1 1 18 77.8% 06 BOWMAN R. 1 7 6 1 14 92. 9% 06 PEARSON M. 1 8 7 1 16 93.8%  01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Multihandicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 3 0 2 0 0 10 80.0% TOTALS 12 4 0 2 0 0 18 88.9%  01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 4 11 0 1 0 0 16 93.8%  01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 2 3 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 03 1 3 4 100.0% 05 2 2 4 100.0% 06 1 1 .0%  01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Safety Patrol 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Tutors .0% .0% Morning Announce 2 1 3 66. 7% 1 1 100.0% Ambassadors 3 3 1 2 1 10 60.0% 1 1 .0% STOP Club 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Honors Club .0% .0% Just Say No 13 7 3 1 1 25 80.0% .0% Fire Marshals 3 3 6 100.0% .0% Student Council 5 5 2 1 1 1 15 66. 7% 2 2 .0% Drill Team 1 17 1 19 94. 7% 1 1 100.0% Student Represen 17 2 1 20 85.0% 2 2 100.0% Dance Team Rep 7 16 3 2 1 29 79.3% 1 1 100.0% Choir .0% 2 1 3 66.7% TOTAL 40 72 15 19 10 11 167 67 .1% 7 1 5 13 53.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's K 4 2 6 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors K 5 7 12 100.0% All A's ls 2 10 1 13 92.3% A \u0026amp; B Honors ls 8 7 2 1 18 83.3% All A's 2n 2 1 3 66.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors 2n 2 5 2 1 10 70.0% All A's 3r 2 2 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 3r 5 2 2 1 10 70.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 4t 1 5 1 7 85.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors St 3 1 4 75.0% All A's 6t 2 1 3 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 6t 4 2 6 66.7% TOTAL 31 48 3 10 2 94 84.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS 2 2 1 2 2 100.0% 4 50.0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1  11/03/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 3 2 2 3 6 33.3% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Pupil Services BM BF 1 2 3 WM WF 2 2 2 OM OF Total 3 4 5 % Black 33.3% 50.0% 60.0% BM 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 2 OM  2 OF Total 2 2 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC Discipline Sunshine BM BF 2 3 3 WM WF OM 1 1 3 OF Total 3 % Black 66.7% 3 100.0% 7 42.9% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE School Safety STUDENT COUNCIL FIELD DAY BM BF 5 2 4 WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 5 Black 83.3% 66.7% 80.0% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROFESSIONAL GRO STOP COTILLION PROGR BM BF 1 1 2 WM WF 1 3 1 OM OF Total 2 4 3 % Black 50.0% 25.0% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .\u0026gt; 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLACK HISTORY MO COE SCHOOL RECRUITME BM BF 2 1 2 WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total 4 3 3 % Black 50.0% 33.3% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3  6 OF Total 3 % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM TOTAL 39 2 24 OF Total % Black 65 60.0% BM  11/03/97 PAGE 7 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 5 10 17 41. 2% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 20 Curriculum Study Leadership Acad 1 Mastery Learning Multi-C Counsel. Abacus 20 PET 25 WHOLE LANGUAGE 2 COOP LEARNING 15 SAT -8 TEST INTE 20 SDDI 20 COE 20 PATHWAYS TO EXCE 20 AR READING ASSO. 3 TOTAL 76 103  11/03/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 13 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 11/03/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 26 CYCLE 1 17 CYCLE 2 8 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 15 ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULTURAL DIVERS! 1 LEARNING STYLES 4 TOTAL 72  PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97  PAGE 1 Ba)KER -    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 12 1 18 0 0 32 40.63 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 17 6 26 0 0 50 36.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.00 34.00 12.00 52.00 00 00 so 36.00  POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES OTHER LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 6 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.18 68.18 00 13. 64 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7 4 1 2 1 1 5 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 85.71 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 86.36 86.36  POSITION TOTAL PERCENT  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 32 6 29 6.94 44.44 8.33 40.28 0 .OD 0 .oo 72 72 % BLACK 51.39 51.39    01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 22 17 18 1 2 77 50.6% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 20 26 12 13 2 1 74 62.2% 02 16 27 15 21 5 1 85 50.6% 03 23 22 20 17 1 2 85 52.9% 04 22 24 18 21 1 3 89 51. 7% 05 27 21 22 20 1 4 95 50.5% 06 29 20 19 25 2 1 96 51.0% Total 154 162 123 135 13 14 601 52.6% 25.6% 27.0% 20.5% 22.5% 2.2% 2.3%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROWN M. 1 3 7 5 5 20 50.0% K HURST M. 1 4 6 4 4 1 19 52.6% K JEFFRIES v. 1 5 4 4 4 2 19 47.4% K WALLS B. 1 5 5 4 5 19 52.6% 01 FARLEY J. 1 6 5 3 5 19 57.9% 01 HESTIR J. 1 5 7 4 2 1 19 63.2% 01 JONES A. 1 5 6 1 4 1 17 64.7% 01 HARRIS K. 1 4 8 4 2 1 19 63.2% 02 FAIR D. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAVES I. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 HIGDON T. 1 4 6 3 6 2 21 47.6% 02 TAGGART M. 1 4 7 3 5 2 21 52.4%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 ELLINGTON L. l 6 5 5 4 l 21 52.4% 03 FUTRELL C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 22 50.0% 03 HALLUM A. 1 5 6 5 4 1 21 52.4% 03 TUCKER T. 1 6 6 5 4 21 57 .1% 04 AUSTIN C. 1 5 6 5 6 1 23 47.8% 04 ELLINGTON L. 1 1 1 .0% 04 HARDING C. 1 7 5 4 4 1 21 57 .1% 04 HAYDEN D. 1 5 6 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 TAYLOR c. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 HIPPS D. 1 7 6 6 5 1 25 52.0% 05 JOHNSON M. 1 7 5 6 5 1 24 50.0% 05 KELLEY C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 2 24 45.8%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 LEHNHOFF D. 1 7 5 5 5 22 54.5% 06 COLFORD S. 1 7 6 4 7 24 54.2% 06 HARRIS P. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 06 HARRIS K. 1 1 1 .0% 06 NEWCOMB D. 1 8 4 5 6 1 24 50.0% 06 WEIR N. 1 7 5 4 7 1 24 50.0%   01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 5 2 4 1 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 8 3 5 1 0 0 17 64.7%   01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 13 15 31 23 2 4 88 31. 8%   01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 3 1 1 5 80.0% 01 2 1 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 .0% 03 2 1 3 66.7% 04 1 1 100.0%   01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 27 21 14 31 2 2 97 49.5% 1 1 2 50.0% Jazzy Jaguars 18 11 18 14 3 64 45.3% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Helpers 6 10 7 10 1 1 35 45.7% 1 1 2 50.0% BAMBIS 12 12 12 12 48 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council .0% 2 2 .0% Fire Marshal ls 1 2 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DARE 24 28 20 20 2 1 95 54.7% 1 3 4 25.0% TOTAL 89 84 73 89 5 7 347 49.9% 1 6 9 16 43.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF BIRACIAL P.T.A. BOARD MBR Discipline Hear 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 2 2 8 Black 50.0% .0% 50.0% BM 1 2  10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 4 2 2 17 4 25 Black 50.0% 24.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Field Day Parent Involment Reading BM 1 BF 2 1 2 WM WF 3 4 1 OM OF Total 5 6 3 % Black 40.0% 33.3% 66.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 5  2 OF Total 9 % Black .0% .0% 44.4%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Awards/Honors School Spirit Science Fair BM BF 2 1 1 WM 1 WF 2 5 2 OM OF Total % 5 6 3 Black 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 7 3 WM 2 WF OM 4  3 OF Total % 11 5 Black 63.6% 60.0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Behavior Mange. COE BM 1 1 BF WM 4 3 1 1 WF 3 2 2 OM OF Total % 7 4 7 Black 57 .1% 25.0% 57 .1% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 2  4 OF Total % 6 Black .0% 66.7% .0%   01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners In Ed 1 1 2 50.0% .0% School Safety 2 1 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TOTAL 6 22 5 32 65 43 .1% 7 20 7 28 62 43.5%  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 39 TESA 31 HUMAN RELATIONS 47 TEAM BUILDING 50 TOTAL 167  10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 10  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CYCLE 1 23 CYCLE 2 6 CYCLE 3 8 COOP. LEARNING 48 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 TOTAL 89  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. 42 TOTAL 42  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Learning styles 48 Testing 50 TOTAL 98  PAGE 1 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 8 1 18 0 0 00 29.63 3.70 66.67 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 18 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 27 00 27 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 29.63 29.63 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 2 12 1 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 11. 76 70.59 5.88 11. 76 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 2 1 1 5 4 17 00 17 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.35 82.35 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 2 20 2 20 4.55 45.45 4.55 45.45 0 .oo 0 .oo 44 44 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 17 5 10 1 2 54 66.7% P4 4 5 4 4 1 0 18 50.0% SP 6 0 1 1 0 0 8 75.0% 01 26 20 6 8 1 1 62 74.2% 02 21 16 11 10 3 2 63 58. 7% 03 21 15 9 2 1 1 49 73.5% 04 17 8 3 4 6 7 45 55.6% 05 18 9 4 8 3 2 44 61.4% 06 5 10 6 0 4 3 28 53.6% Total 137 100 49 47 20 18 371 63.9% 36.9% 27.0% 13.2% 12.7% 5.4% 4.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DUGAN F. 1 7 6 1 4 1 19 68.4% K JONES P. 1 5 4 4 3 16 56.3% K TOLBERT I. 1 7 7 2 1 1 18 77.8% K WASHINGTON M. 1 1 1 .0% P4 MCCLURKAN E. 1 4 5 4 4 1 18 50.0% 01 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 KOON B. 1 1 1 .0% 01 ROSE s. 1 9 7 2 1 1 20 80.0% 01 SCRUBBS v. 1 8 6 2 4 20 70.0% 01 WASHINGTON M. 1 9 7 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 CROMEDY G. 1 6 5 3 2 2 1 19 57.9% 02 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 HARROD A. 1 8 6 3 5 22 63.6% 02 KOON B. 1 7 4 5 3 1 1 21 52.4% 03 JOHNSON D. 1 13 9 2 1 25 88.0% 03 OLIVERS. 1 8 6 7 2 1 24 58.3% 04 GOVAR M. 1 8 3 2 3 5 21 52.4% 04 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 2 100.0% 04 YOUNGE. 1 9 5 1 1 6 2 24 58.3% 05 HANNAHS B. 1 10 4 2 2 2 20 70.0% 05 HIGHT R. 1 8 5 2 6 1 2 24 54.2% 05 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 06 HANNAHS B. 1 1 1 100.0% 06 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Count Black 06 VARDAMAN T. 1 5 9 6 4 3 27 51. 9% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 2 3 1 0 11 45.5% Visually Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 10 1 3 5 1 0 20 55.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 5 8 2 5 0 25 40.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 2 100.0% 01 2 1 3 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 6 3 4 4 17 52.9% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILITATOR 10 9 2 3 1 3 28 67.9% 1 1 .0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 18 10 7 6 6 5 52 53.8% 1 1 .0% BRADY SCH.CHOIR 9 9 5 6 5 5 39 46.2% 1 1 .0% GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENT 5 5 8 2 5 25 40.0% 1 1 .0% DRILL TEAM 14 4 5 23 60.9% 2 2 100.0% CHAPTER I READIN 36 18 5 3 3 7 72 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHAPTER I MATH 22 18 5 4 5 5 59 67.8% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 10 9 3 2 1 4 29 65.5% 1 1 .0% AMBASSADORS 7 5 4 4 1 1 22 54.5% 1 1 .0% CONFLICT MANAGRS 15 10 3 2 6 1 37 67.6% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 138 110 46 40 33 36 403 61.5% 4 11 15 26.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Imp Aca K- 3 1 1 8 13 30.8% Prine. (A's) 1- 8 9 10 10 8 4 49 34.7% Hon.Rol(A/B) 1- 34 21 13 12 3 14 97 56.7% Citizenship P- 58 37 20 23 11 20 169 56.2% Attendance P- 30 25 12 9 8 17 101 54.5% Most Imp Cit K- 3 6 2 6 2 5 24 37.5% TOTAL 136 99 57 61 32 68 453 51. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MEM 1 1 1 3 6 33.3% 1 2 1 3 7 42.9% VIPS/P.I.E 1 1 2 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO SCH.RECRUIT TEAM BM BF 2 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % 5 Black .0% .0% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TEXTBOOK SELECT BUILDING COORDIN STAFF DEV COMM BM BF 3 2 WM WF 1 1 3 2 OM OF Total % 1 7 4 Black 42.9% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GUIDANCE COMM FIELD DAY MEDIA CONSULTANT BM BF WM WF 3 1 4 4 1 OM OF Total 7 5 1 % Black 42.9% 20.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TALENT SHOW STUDENT COUNCIL PUPIL SERVICES BM BF WM WF 2 3 2 2 4 OM OF Total % 4 2 7 Black 50.0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 1 1 Black 2 50.0% 1 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SUNSHINE COMM DISCIPLINE MANAG GRANT WRITING BM BF WM WF 1 4 1 6 1 1 OM OF Total 7 6 1 % Black 14.3% 66.7% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 7 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black GRADE LEVEL CH 3 4 7 42.9% .0% MULTICULTURAL CM 2 6 8 25.0% .0% TOTAL 2 30 6 49 87 36.8% 2 9 1 9 21 52.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 14 TESA 12 RACE RELATIONS 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 10 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 2 3 PRE SCHOOL INSER 12 15 SCHOOL LAW 12 COE 15 READING STYLES 13 MULTICULT ED 10 6 BRADY MISSION ST 11 EARLY CHILDHOOD 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 128 16 9 4 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING WINNEBAGO COMPUTER PROGRAM LIBRARY IN SERV WINDOWS 95 WORDS 1 WORDS@ POWER POINT 1 POWER POINT 2 TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 10 6 2 12 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 49 9 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 14 CLASSROOM MGMT. 15 POSITIVE DISCIP. 4 SCHOOL LAW 12 SCHOOL WIDE DISC 9 6 6 CLASSROOM MANAG 15 TOTAL 65 4 6 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 14 LEARNING STYLES 20 SELF ESTEEM 8 2 4 PORTOFOLIO ASSES 16 1 INTERGRAT CURRIC 12 ABACUS TRAINING 14 WINDOW ON SCIENC 8 2 PARENT INVOLVE 8 2 SIP 5 1 1 TEACHER EVALUAT 6 1 COMPUTER INSERV 10 9 1 2 MATH MANIULATIV 9 8 ESL/LEP 9 30 1 3 SELF ESTEEM 8 5 WRIT ACROSS CURR 9 REACH INSERVICE 12 SCIENCE HANDS-ON 13 2 AR K-4 CRUSADE 1 POLAROID CAMERA 2 EARLY CDLHD CONV 4 SOC STUD INSERV 25 26 SUCCESS FOR ALL 15 TOTAL 206 103 10 10 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE CURRICULUM SPECIALIST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 23 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 33 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 13 1 30 0 1 46 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.17 28.26 2.17 65.22 00 2.17 46 % BLACK 00 100.00 24.24 50.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 16.00 60.00 00 24.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 5 5 1 2 1 5 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 50.00 00 60.00 83.33 76.00 76.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 28 1 36 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7.04 39.44 1.41 50.70 0 .oo 1. 41 71 71 % BLACK 46.48 46.48 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 9 21 16 10 2 1 59 50.8% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 21 16 19 11 1 1 69 53.6% 02 22 23 26 16 1 2 90 50.0% 03 29 19 19 19 3 1 90 53.3% 04 32 20 25 11 1 5 94 55.3% 05 31 19 25 21 2 2 100 50.0% 06 24 26 20 22 0 2 94 53.2% Total 168 144 150 110 10 14 596 52.3% 28.2% 24.2% 25.2% 18.5% 1. 7% 2.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DANIELS. 1 4 7 5 2 1 1 20 55.0% K DOYNE A. 1 3 7 6 4 20 50.0% K HOOKER M. 1 2 7 5 4 1 19 47.4% 01 GLENN L. 1 7 5 6 4 1 23 52.2% 01 HAMPTON H. l 7 5 7 3 1 23 52.2% 01 SKUBAL E. 1 7 6 6 4 23 56.5% 02 JOSEPH J. 1 6 6 7 4 23 52.2% 02 SMITH-MALLETT G. 1 6 7 6 2 1 22 59.1% 02 MCKENDRY S. 1 5 6 6 6 23 47.8% 02 YARBROUGH L. 1 5 4 7 4 1 1 22 40.9% 03 CARTWRIGHT J. 1 6 5 5 4 2 22 50.0% 03 HURD L. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 MUNNS P. 1 9 5 4 4 22 63.6% 03 PENN P. 1 7 4 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 BUCK v. 1 9 5 6 2 1 23 60.9% 04 HARRISON K. 1 8 5 6 4 1 24 54.2% 04 JESTER J. 1 8 4 6 3 1 2 24 50.0% 04 MUNNS P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 WASHINGTON K. 1 7 5 7 2 1 22 54.5% 05 BLANKENSHIP K. 1 8 4 6 5 1 1 25 48.0% 05 GLENN B. 1 8 4 7 5 1 25 48.0% 05 HARNESS E. 1 8 6 5 5 1 25 56.0% 05 PACE T. 1 7 5 7 6 25 48.0% 06 BYRD D. 1 6 6 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Teacher 06 06 06 FLEMING L. SHIELDS H. THOMAS V. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 6 6 5 6 23 52.2% 6 7 5 5 1 24 54.2% 6 7 5 6 24 54.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPR03 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 87.5% TOTALS 11 1 2 1 0 0 15 80.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 29 20 52 45 3 9 158 31.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 1 3 66.7% 01 1 1 .0% 02 1 1 1 3 33.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE  1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FIRE MARSHALS 2 1 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO 23 27 22 21 1 94 53.2% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 2 3 7 1 14 21. 4% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 4 8 7 9 1 29 41.4% 1 1 2 50.0% AMBASSADORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% MATH OLYMPAID .0% 1 1 .0% SCIENCE CLUB 4 3 3 3 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% NEWS TEAM 4 5 5 4 1 19 47.4% 1 1 .0% ODESSY OF MIND .0% 1 1 .0% THINKING CAP QUI 2 2 3 5 1 2 15 26. 7% 1 1 .0% SUMMER READING 37 36 13 6 92 79.3% 2 1 5 8 25.0% MATH FAIR .0% 1 1 .0% INVENT AMERICA .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCIENCE FAIR .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPACE FAIR .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black CARDINAL CLUB 9 8 6 23 39.1% .0% TOTAL 77 93 65 63 2 5 305 55.7% 10 1 17 28 35.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black COURT. KIDS K .0% COURT. KIDS 1 .0% COURT. KIDS 2 .0% COURT. KIDS 3 .0% COURT. KIDS 4 .0% COURT. KIDS 5 .0% COURT. KIDS 6 .0% A HONOR ROLL lS 9 7 15 10 1 1 43 37.2% A/B HONOR RL lS 8 9 3 1 21 81.0% A HONOR ROLL 2N 5 8 15 12 2 42 31.0% A/B HONOR RL 2N 11 7 1 3 1 1 24 75.0% A HONOR ROLL 3R 6 4 18 7 1 5 41 24.4% A/B HONOR RL 3R 9 7 3 4 23 69.6% A HONOR ROLL 4T 4 6 13 15 2 2 42 23.8% A/B HONOR RL 4T 12 7 10 4 33 57.6% A HONOR ROLL ST .0% A/B HONOR RL ST .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A HONOR ROLL 6T .0% A/B HONOR RO 6T .0% TOTAL 64 55 78 56 7 9 269 44.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 7 12 41. 7% VIPS 1 1 1 1 4 25.0% 2 2 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PUPIL SERV. TEAM LEADERSHIP COE RECRUITMENT TEAM 2 4 2 1 5 10 2 7 15 4 Black 28.6% 26.7% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black .0% 33.3% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % STP CONSULT TEAM BCC HONORS COMMITTEE 5 2 2 1 2 7 2 3 1 13 7 5 Black 38.5% 28.6% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % GIT SCH. COMMITT HEALTH ACTION TM COURT. KIDS 4 2 2 1 6 1 10 3 3 Black 40.0% 66.7% 66.7% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM 4 OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 28 6 41 2 77 36.4% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 5 8 2 18 33 39.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 42 TESA 32 RACE RELATIONS 17 HUMAN RELATIONS 17 CULTURAL RELAT. 12 AT-RISK 25 TOTAL 145 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 3 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 32 11 5 34 2 2 84 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 30 1 CLASSROOM MGMT. 33 GOALS OF MISBEHA 40 5 POSITIVE DISPLIN 40 5 GREEN CIRCLE 4 TOTAL 147 11 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LITERATURE BASED 22 BALANCED WRITING 2 WHOLE LANGUAGE 21 WRITE MORE LEARN 2 MAST/FOSS TRAIN! 20 WRITE GRP WKSP 7 LEARNING STYLES 8 ADD/ADHD 8 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 5 INTEGRATING CURR 29 HAT TRAINING 3 MATH/LANG ART PR 33 DEFIANT CHILD 46 SCHOOL IMPROVEME 48  MULTIPLE INTELLI 49 AETN-CRIT. VIEW! 45 ECOE INTRODUCTIO 40 TEACH SELF DISC! 45 MC RAT 5 3 DISCIPLINE MGMT 8 CMSIMON AWARD 2 EXPANING REACH 2 PATHWAY TO EXCEL 43 G/T IDENTIFICATI 40 LRSD SCIENCE 30 TOTAL 563 3    POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE AUXILIARY TEACHER SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 10 17 11 37 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 POSITIONS 16 31 21 47 0 0 13.91 26.96 18.26 40.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 1 5 75 10 6 2 4 1 3 3 1 2 115 00 115 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 60.00 36.00 80.00 33.33 00 50.00 00 33.33 00 00 50.00 40.87 40.87 NO\\I 4 i997 Qrr\\CE Of DtSEGl\\tGA110N MOtU10RING POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY SECURITY OFFICER SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 14 17 1 8 0 2 SUBTOTAL PERCENT QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 11 13 1 1 7 5 1 42 33.33 40.48 2.38 19.05 00 4.76 42 % BLACK 66.67 72.73 92.31 00 00 42.86 100.00 100.00 73.81 73.81 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 30 48 22 55 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.11 30.57 14.01 35.03 0 .oo 1. 27 157 157 % BLACK 49.68 49.68 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 20 12 0 0 0 1 33 97.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 10 210 246 113 127 8 7 711 64 .1% 11 160 204 122 148 10 5 649 56 .1% 12 104 139 93 100 7 10 453 53.6% Total 494 601 328 375 25 23 1846 59.3% 26.8% 32.6% 17.8% 20.3% 1.4% 1. 2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADAIR G. 1 4 3 1 8 87.5% ATKINS L. 1 41 59 21 15 1 137 73.0% BECKER M. 1 15 38 37 53 1 144 36.8% BLAIR S. 1 5 1 2 8 62.5% BLEVINS P. 1 26 36 23 30 1 1 117 53.0% BOYETTE. 1 26 57 24 32 1 140 59.3% BRACK R. 1 28 72 5 16 2 1 124 80.6% BRANDON E. 1 44 43 12 5 4 108 80.6% BROADNAX-THRA B. 1 52 52 10 10 1 125 83.2% BROOKS S. 1 34 50 20 11 1 1 117 71.8% BROWN J. 1 9 12 37 45 5 5 113 18.6% CALDWELL s. 1 4 12 24 54 3 7 104 15.4% CALLAWAY N. 1 32 33 18 22 2 1 108 60.2% CARR P. 1 37 52 21 18 2 130 68.5% CARUTH P. 1 11 16 26 39 2 3 97 27.8% CHAMBLISS P. 1 12 17 14 38 3 4 88 33.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black CHANDLER J. 1 40 44 12 10 2 108 77.8% COBB J. 1 4 10 35 52 6 9 116 12 .1% COLBURN M. 1 19 46 31 35 2 3 136 47.8% COLE J. 1 15 18 16 38 2 3 92 35.9% COLLINS R. 1 45 49 13 9 2 118 79.7% COONS. 1 39 17 35 45 2 138 40.6% COOPER V. 1 33 41 24 27 3 2 130 56.9% CORTINEZ K. 1 23 34 33 47 2 1 140 40.7% COX B. 1 40 49 21 22 132 67.4% DANIEL B. 1 7 6 44 19 5 7 88 14.8% DAVIS M. 1 48 33 6 6 3 96 84.4% DEITZ s. 1 19 17 24 19 2 8 89 40.4% DIXON s. 1 40 47 16 13 2 2 120 72.5% DONHAM M. 1 13 29 30 42 2 2 118 35.6% DUMAS E. 1 1 1 100. 0% EASTER M. 1 12 24 29 51 2 2 120 30.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDWARDS J. 1 38 42 19 26 1 126 63.5% EVANS K. 1 25 33 18 12 88 65.9% FIELDS W. 1 21 31 7 1 1 61 85.2% FITZPATRICK Jo. 1 44 48 28 30 150 61. 3% FUTRELL B. 1 32 60 10 21 1 124 74.2% GADBERRY s. 1 6 15 37 69 3 4 134 15. 7% GADDY H. 1 25 11 1 1 38 94.7% GATES K. 1 18 36 33 47 3 137 39.4% GAY A. 1 39 45 21 21 4 130 64.6% GRAY J. 1 58 37 10 2 2 1 110 86.4% GUY K. 1 1 1 100.0% HALL-JONES B. 1 28 9 2 39 94.9% HAMMONS K. 1 41 30 8 8 2 89 79.8% HARDIN G. 1 13 18 30 33 4 3 101 30.7% HARGIS A. 1 9 18 36 69 1 2 135 20.0% HARRIS H. 1 44 32 17 29 3 3 128 59.4% LR~D ' SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HOFFMAN M. 1 27 37 21 19 1 3 108 59.3% HOLLADAY K. 1 28 37 24 36 125 52.0% HOWARD R. 1 8 3 11 100.0% HUFFORD G. 1 6 16 36 49 5 6 118 18.6% JAMES B. 1 1 1 100.0% JERNIGAN R. 1 31 47 21 24 1 124 62.9% KALB M. 1 33 33 23 29 1 3 122 54 .1% KEARNEY L. 1 11 11 39 24 3 1 89 24.7% LENIEAR H. 1 34 40 23 25 1 123 60.2% LIGON M. 1 11 16 31 24 1 2 85 31. 8% LOYA s. 1 23 43 20 30 1 117 56.4% MAYS G. 1 33 43 18 26 4 124 61. 3% MCDONALD D. 1 34 33 23 14 2 106 63.2% MCDONALD T. 1 2 12 11 14 39 35.9% MCLENDON J. 1 43 40 25 27 1 1 137 60.6% MCMURRAY v. 1 42 48 20 25 1 136 66.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MEADOWS M. 1 43 44 13 3 2 105 82.9% BARNUM R. l 3 12 3 18 83.3% BERRY D. 1 10 4 3 17 82.4% EACKLES v. 1 6 6 100.0% GRUMMER JR c. 1 7 2 2 2 13 69.2% BURCHETT s. 1 12 12 100.0% PERRY M. 1 11 9 3 23 87.0% SKIPPER J. 1 30 6 3 39 92.3% SODERLING L. 1 38 38 100.0% TENPENNY A. 1 6 14 20 100.0% MCCREE D. 1 3 3 100.0% MILES B. 1 6 3 9 100. 0% PRATHER L. 1 26 2 28 92.9% MILLER B. 1 51 41 12 11 1 1 117 78.6% MILLER R. 1 28 48 24 19 6 125 60.8% MOORE K. 1 32 50 23 27 1 133 61. 7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C'S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MORRIS W. 1 1 1 100.0% NASH L. 1 41 45 15 4 1 106 81.1% NASH D. 1 33 41 27 23 124 59. 7% PAIGE JR w. 1 38 28 31 6 4 107 61.7% PAULS. 1 31 54 21 11 2 119 71. 4% PAXTON v. 1 40 53 12 10 2 117 79.5% PEYTON E. 1 27 39 26 6 98 67.3% PIERCE M. 1 40 45 15 15 1 116 73.3% PIERCE s. 1 49 44 8 7 1 109 85.3% PITTMAN c. 1 7 20 30 61 1 119 22.7% POST J. 1 62 29 2 1 94 96.8% REEDY J. 1 32 51 18 25 2 2 130 63.8% ROBERTSON JR T. 1 26 46 13 2 1 88 81.8% ROBINSON c. 1 17 30 12 5 1 65 72. 3% ROUSSEAU N. 1 3 4 5 3 15 46. 7% RUTLEDGE M. 1 34 52 20 21 2 1 130 66.2% LR$D  SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SCHLESINGER D. 1 35 12 5 4 1 57 82.5% SEWARD D. 1 44 49 15 14 2 1 125 74.4% SHOFNER K. 1 43 44 15 18 1 121 71.9% SIEGEL L. 1 35 48 18 24 3 3 131 63.4% SIEGEL T. 1 3 1 4 .0% SNODGRASS A. 1 44 47 14 6 1 112 81.3% STAFFORD B. 1 27 51 19 24 3 2 126 61. 9% STEADMAN A. 1 14 32 29 44 2 4 125 36.8% TEETER E. 1 52 40 9 14 2 117 78.6% THOMAS A. 1 58 so 13 1 122 88.5% THOMPSON F. 1 56 47 3 2 6 114 90.4% THOMPSON J. 1 19 32 38 49 2 1 141 36.2% THOMPSON L. 1 11 41 32 46 2 4 136 38.2% THREATT c. 1 42 48 20 10 1 121 74.4% VENABLE G. 1 13 67 4 2 1 2 89 89.9% WALKER R. 1 30 49 14 27 2 1 123 64.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WATSON B. 1 8 15 37 54 4 3 121 19.0% WHISTLE V. 1 38 58 17 15 128 75.0% WHITEHORN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% WILDER B. 1 22 37 18 23 2 1 103 57.3% WILLIAMS B. 1 1 1 .0% WILLIAMSON M. 1 22 8 2 32 93.8% WILLIAMS G. 1 20 11 2 33 93.9% WILLIS E. 1 37 34 18 11 100 71.0% WILSON C. 1 37 40 20 28 1 1 127 60.6% WILSON N. 1 34 22 23 40 2 3 124 45.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 11 5 0 0 0 0 16 100.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 35 25 9 4 0 0 73 82.2% Speech or Language Impaired 7 6 0 1 0 0 14 92.9% TOTALS 54 36 10 5 0 0 105 85.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 78 136 119 163 10 6 512 41. 8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 10 22 19 3 1 1 46 89 .1% 11 15 13 4 1 1 34 82.4% 12 3 2 5 100.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 94 151 71 99 5 11 431 56.8% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 51 30 14 9 1 66 39 77 .1% 11 27 11 11 1 38 12 76.0% 12 13 10 2 2 15 12 85.2% MATH 10 41 24 8 2 49 26 86. 7% 11 21 21 8 3 1 30 24 77.8% 12 6 13 2 3 1 8 17 76.0% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 47 30 11 2 1 59 32 84.6% 11 5 6 9 14 6 55.0% 12 13 4 3 3 16 7 73.9% SCIENCE 10 16 16 5 3 1 22 19 78.0% 11 15 14 7 1 22 15 78.4% 12 9 11 2 5 11 16 74 .1% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 20.0% Math 1 1 3 5 40.0% Science 2 2 3 7 28.6% Social Studies 1 1 2 .0% Foreign Language 5 1 6 .0% TOTAL 1 4 3 16 1 25 20.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 53 17 70 75.7% 4 4 .0% Drill Team 26 26 100.0% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 1 7 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Govt 4 14 6 3 2 1 30 60.0% 1 1 .0% TAILS 10 39 2 11 62 79.0% 2 1 3 6 33.3% FCS 1 5 14 45 65 9.2% 1 1 . 0% German Club 7 10 25 13 2 2 59 28.8% 1 1 .0% Young Democrats 3 11 11 39 1 4 69 20.3% 2 2 .0% French Club 5 17 20 32 2 1 77 28.6% 2 2 .0% CCE 5 13 8 1 27 66.7% 1 1 100.0% DECA 4 15 4 23 82.6% 1 1 100.0% FBLA 21 44 5 1 71 91. 5% 3 1 4 75.0% Accpt No Bound 10 22 22 47 6 8 115 27.8% 1 1 2 .0% Rotary Interact .0% 1 1 .0% Ladies Club .0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 41 1 42 97.6% 1 1 100.0% Troubadours 10 23 22 30 2 4 91 36.3% 3 1 3 7 42.9% Beta Club 5 27 50 108 8 9 207 15.5% 2 2 .0% Basketball 27 21 3 3 54 88.9% 2 2 100.0% Volleyball 7 13 20 35.0% 1 1 .0% Baseball .0% 2 2 100.0% Soccer .0% 1 1 .0% Golf .0% 1 1 .0% Tennis .0% 1 1 .0% Track .0% 1 1 .0% Madrigals 7 6 3 16 81. 3% 1 1 100.0% Nat.Honor.Soc. 2 14 21 42 4 4 87 18.4% 2 2 .0% Science Club 1 4 12 31 5 3 56 8.9% 1 1 2 .0% Latin Club 1 4 9 13 1 28 17.9% 1 1 .0% VICA 6 8 7 1 22 63.6% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ASO 8 5 2 15 86.7% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 232 342 251 454 33 38 1350 42.5% 8 13 12 24 1 58 36.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Supt. Honor 4 13 21 1 5 44 9 .1% A Honor Roll 1 9 36 64 7 10 127 7.9% B+ Honor 7 38 38 88 2 7 180 25.0% B Honor Roll 30 57 38 49 4 5 183 47.5% TOTAL 38 108 125 222 14 27 534 27.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT .0% .0% PTSA BOARD 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 6 50.0% GIFTED/TALENTED 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLDGS/GROUNDS HOSPITALITY LIBRARY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 1 WM 1 WF 3 12 5 OM 2 OF Total 6 14 6 % Black 33.3% 14.3% 16.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROJECT GRAD. SENIOR ACTIV. TEACHER APPREC. BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 6 3 6 WM WF 19 12 32 OM 3 OF Total % 25 15 38 Black 24.0% 20.0% 15.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SCHOOL SAFETY HEALTH/WELLNESS AR/DRUG FREE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 4 1 WM WF 3 3 5 OM 4 OF Total 4 7 6 % Black 25.0% 57 .1% 16. 7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BOOSTER CLUB PUBLIC RELATIONS TOTAL BM 2 BF WM WF 3 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 4 10 50.0% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 31 2 108 143 23.1% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 58 TESA 66 COOP. LEARNING 59 LEARN STYLES 3 VARIOUS OTHERS 8 TOTAL 194 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 38 CYCLE 1 9 CYCLE 2 7 CYCLE 3 7 VARIOUS COURSES 13 TOTAL 74 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 38 CLASSROOM MGMT. 61 ALT ASSESSMENT 18 CONFLICT MGMT. 35 VARIOUS COURSES 11 TOTAL 163 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Content Area TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 48 5 48 5 PAGE 1 ffiICXJI'    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 8 2 14 0 0 24 33.33 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 33.33 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 14 3 24 0 0 42 35.71 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.38 33.33 7 .14 57.14 00 00 42 35.71 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 1 0 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 7 0 4 0 2 13 53.85 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 60.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 12 0 3 30 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13. 33 36.67 00 40.00 00 10.00 30 50.00 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 25 3 36 6.94 34.72 4.17 50.00 0 .oo 3 4.17 72 72 41.67 41.67 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 23 16 6 6 3 5 59 66 .1% P4 11 7 10 6 1 1 36 50.0% SP 7 6 4 2 1 0 20 65.0% 01 26 25 10 8 4 2 75 68.0% 02 21 30 7 6 5 5 74 68.9% 03 25 26 8 6 6 1 72 70.8% 04 28 19 8 9 3 0 67 70.1% 05 24 23 5 7 2 1 62 75.8% 06 27 21 11 4 4 3 70 68.6% Total 192 173 69 54 29 18 535 68.2% 35.9% 32.3% 12.9% 10.1% 5.4% 3.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K ZINAMON B. 1 1 1 100.0% K KERR P. 1 8 4 2 2 1 3 20 60.0% K MURPH K. 1 8 6 2 2 1 1 20 70.0% K SABO D. 1 7 6 2 2 1 1 19 68.4% P4 BARRE F. 1 6 4 5 3 18 55.6% P4 MIMS S. 1 5 3 5 3 1 1 18 44.4% 01 DAVIS L. 1 9 9 3 2 1 1 25 72. 0% 01 ELLIS s. 1 7 9 4 4 1 25 64.0% 01 ZINAMON B. 1 1 l 100.0% 01 TEETER P. 1 10 7 3 2 2 1 25 68.0% 02 EANS s. 1 8 9 2 2 1 3 25 68.0% 02 NEAL L. 1 7 9 3 2 2 1 24 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 WELLS J. 1 6 12 2 2 2 1 25 72.0% 03 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 100. 0% 03 HOLLINGSWORTH J. 1 7 9 3 2 3 1 25 64.0% 03 ZINAMON 8. 1 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 03 ROSES. 1 9 9 3 2 2 25 72.0% 03 WILLIAMS F. 1 9 8 2 2 1 22 77.3% 04 BEDOW L. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 04 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 04 ISBELL P. 1 11 5 2 3 21 76.2% 04 SHANKS B. 1 10 5 2 3 3 23 65.2% 04 WILLIAMS E. 1 7 9 4 3 23 69.6% 05 BEDOW L. 1 1 1 100. 0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 BRYANT G. 1 7 9 1 3 20 80.0% 05 GALYEAN N. 1 9 6 1 1 2 1 20 75.0% 05 HARDESTY S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 05 JOHNSON J. 1 8 8 3 3 22 72. 7% 06 BEDOW L. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 06 CHILCOTE M. 1 8 10 4 1 23 78.3% 06 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 .0% 06 MALLETT O. 1 9 5 3 2 2 1 22 63.6% 06 PETTUS I. 1 10 6 4 2 1 2 25 64.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 33.3% Mentally Retarded 3 2 1 1 0 0 7 71. 4% Multihandicapped 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 50.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 9 6 3 1 0 28 64.3% Visually Handicapped 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% TOTALS  19 17 10 8 3 0 57 63.2% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 22 9 7 0 0 47 66.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 1 5 60.0% 01 1 1 2 2 1 7 28.6% 02 1 1 2 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Ambassadors 12 16 4 5 1 38 73.7% 1 l 2 50.0% Cafeteria Monit. 3 1 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council 6 14 5 1 26 76.9% 1 2 1 4 8 37.5% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% Fire Marshall 6 3 2 4 15 60.0% 1 1 .0% Quiz Bowl Team .0% .0% Peer Tutor's 4 8 2 6 1 21 57 .1% 1 1 2 50.0% Broadcast Team 2 2 2 1 1 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Cheerleaders 7 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 .0% Tchr of Tomorrow .0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 34 51 16 20 2 2 125 68.0% 1 7 1 10 1 20 40.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL 59 113 34 39 6 251 68.5% PERFECT ATTE 76 88 29 22 4 219 74.9% TOTAL 135 201 63 61 10 470 71.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 4 1 OM 4 1 OF Total % Black .0% 9 55.6% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Parent Recruit. BM BF 1 2 2 WM 1 WF 2 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 2 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 5 1 5 OM OF Total % Black 12 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 3 6 6 15 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. AUTISM WORKSHOP MATH TASK JOSTENS LG. ARTS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 4 7 10 1 10 5 24 13 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT ESL METHODS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 42 9 43 25 85 34 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 12 12 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SCH. IMPROVE. SCH. EMERGENCY 45 23 SCH. TESTING 23 1 COMPUTER TRAIN TOTAL 68 24 CLOVERDA1E POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 3 14 1 14 0 0 9.38 43.75 3.13 43.75 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 24 2 1 1 1 1 1 32 00 32 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 50.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 53.13 53.13 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 9 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 20.00 60.00 00 20.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 1 1 1 5 4 15 00 15 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 80.00 75.00 80.00 80.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 6 23 1 17 12.77 48.94 2.13 36.17 0 .oo 0 .oo 47 47 % BLACK 61.70 61.70 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 30 35 0 4 1 1 71 91. 5% P4 12 16 4 0 0 3 35 80.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 43 35 2 4 2 3 89 87.6% 02 32 38 3 1 0 1 75 93.3% 03 39 24 2 1 0 1 67 94.0% 04 25 35 1 2 0 0 63 95.2% 05 27 24 3 2 0 0 56 91.1% 06 21 31 1 0 1 0 54 96. 3% Total 229 238 16 14 4 9 510 91. 6% 44.9% 46.7% 3.1% 2. 7% .8% 1.8% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K EPPERSON B. 1 8 6 2 1 17 82.4% K HALLS. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% K MILLER G. 1 7 12 19 100.0% K ROLAX S. 1 8 8 2 18 88.9% P4 BUETTNER s. 1 9 6 1 2 18 83.3% P4 ROGERS C. 1 3 10 3 1 17 76.5% 01 COKELEY G. 1 12 6 1 1 1 1 22 81.8% 01 HENTHORNE M. 1 9 10 1 1 21 90.5% 01 SHUFFIELD K. 1 10 10 1 1 22 90.9% 01 SNOWDEN S. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 WALKERS. 1 11 8 2 1 22 86.4% 01 WINEK. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 SNOWDEN s. 1 12 11 1 24 95.8% 02 VANECKO A. 1 10 14 1 25 96.0% 02 VINSON W. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 WINEK. 1 10 12 2 1 25 88.0% 03 MCCLAIN M. 1 12 8 2 1 23 87.0% 03 TRIPCONY w. 1 12 6 1 19 94. 7% 03 WHITED. 1 15 10 25 100.0% 04 MURDOCK S. 1 10 10 1 2 23 87.0% 04 STUART D. 1 11 11 22 100.0% 04 VINSON w. 1 4 14 18 100.0% 05 BANKS B. 1 15 10 1 2 28 89.3% 05 WILSON S. 1 12 14 2 28 92.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 POSITION V. MILLS R. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 12 9 BF 14 17 WM WF 1 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 27 27 96.3% 96.3% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 7 1 1 0 0 16 87.5% TOTALS 10 10 3 1 0 0 24 83.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 11 19 0 1 0 0 31 96.8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 6 3 1 10 90.0% 01 3 3 1 7 85.7% 02 3 3 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 11 12 1 24 95.8% 2 1 3 66.7% AMBASSADORS 9 12 2 1 24 87.5% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 8 10 4 2 24 75.0% 1 1 2 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 10 11 1 1 1 24 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% STRAIGHT TALK 70 8 1 79 88.6% 3 3 100.0% POP TALK 72 3 2 77 93.5% 3 3 100.0% BASKET BALL 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 100. 0% GIFTED PROGRAM 11 18 4 1 34 85.3% 1 1 .0% M \u0026amp; M CLUB .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 129 135 22 8 2 3 299 88.3% 6 8 4 18 77.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD ALL A's ALL A's \u0026amp; B PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP MOST IMPROVE TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black SUNSHINE 1 5 6 16. 7% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 1 1 OF Total % 4 Black .0% 75.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black HOSPITALITY 1 3 2 6 66.7% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% DISCIPLINE 4 1 4 9 44.4% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STAFF DEVELOPMEN 1 1 3 5 40.0% .0% PARTNER IN EDUC 1 1 2 4 50.0% .0% POSITIVE ATTITUD 1 7 1 9 88.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GRANT WRITING PRIN ROUND TABLE TALENT SHOW BM BF 1 6 3 WM WF 1 2 5 1 OM OF Total % 2 12 5 Black .0% 50.0% 80.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% . 0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE COTILLION BCC CARNIVAL BM BF 1 4 4 1 WM WF 1 1 OM OF Total % Black 4 100.0% 6 2 83.3% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCIENCE FAIR SCHOOL PAPER BIRACIAL 1 2 1 2 2 Black .0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % Black 4 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 6 39 3 35 83 % Black 54.2% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 6 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black 63.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 16 TESA 7 RACE RELATIONS 26 HUMAN RELATIONS 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 14 TOTAL 74 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 7 6 3 3 19 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 1 15 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 1 ABACUS TRAINING 18 PARRNT INVOLVEME 1 TOTAL 20 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 6 2 14 0 0 4.35 26.09 8.70 60.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 12 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 23 00 23 % BLACK 00 33.33 00 00 00 00 25.00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":5,"next_page":6,"prev_page":4,"total_pages":15,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":48,"total_count":178,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":178}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":36},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":33},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":11},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":4},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":4},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":3},{"value":"Quality Education and Management Associates","hits":2},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":2},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":2},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Student assistance programs","hits":178},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":176},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":144},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":139},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":125},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":107},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":103},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":98},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":90},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":85},{"value":"School employees","hits":81}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":176},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":176},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":174},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":170},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Phillips County, 34.42829, -90.84802","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Connecticut, 41.66704, -72.66648","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":176},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Missouri","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1995","hits":34},{"value":"1994","hits":33},{"value":"1997","hits":31},{"value":"1992","hits":30},{"value":"1996","hits":29},{"value":"1993","hits":28},{"value":"1999","hits":28},{"value":"1998","hits":23},{"value":"2000","hits":22},{"value":"2001","hits":19},{"value":"1989","hits":18},{"value":"1991","hits":17},{"value":"1990","hits":14},{"value":"2003","hits":14},{"value":"2002","hits":10},{"value":"2004","hits":10},{"value":"2005","hits":8},{"value":"2006","hits":8},{"value":"2008","hits":6},{"value":"1984","hits":5},{"value":"1986","hits":4},{"value":"1987","hits":4},{"value":"1988","hits":4},{"value":"2007","hits":4},{"value":"1974","hits":3},{"value":"1975","hits":3},{"value":"1976","hits":3},{"value":"1977","hits":3},{"value":"1978","hits":3},{"value":"1979","hits":3},{"value":"1980","hits":3},{"value":"1981","hits":3},{"value":"1982","hits":3},{"value":"1983","hits":3},{"value":"1985","hits":3},{"value":"2009","hits":3},{"value":"2010","hits":3},{"value":"1950","hits":2},{"value":"1951","hits":2},{"value":"1952","hits":2},{"value":"1953","hits":2},{"value":"1954","hits":2},{"value":"1955","hits":2},{"value":"1956","hits":2},{"value":"1957","hits":2},{"value":"1958","hits":2},{"value":"1959","hits":2},{"value":"1960","hits":2},{"value":"1961","hits":2},{"value":"1962","hits":2},{"value":"1963","hits":2},{"value":"1964","hits":2},{"value":"1965","hits":2},{"value":"1966","hits":2},{"value":"1967","hits":2},{"value":"1968","hits":2},{"value":"1969","hits":2},{"value":"1970","hits":2},{"value":"1971","hits":2},{"value":"1972","hits":2},{"value":"1973","hits":2},{"value":"2011","hits":2},{"value":"2012","hits":2},{"value":"2013","hits":2},{"value":"2014","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2014","count":498,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":80},{"value":"reports","hits":45},{"value":"legal documents","hits":23},{"value":"judicial records","hits":20},{"value":"handbooks","hits":11},{"value":"prints (visual works)","hits":2},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":1},{"value":"booklets","hits":1},{"value":"books","hits":1},{"value":"brochures","hits":1},{"value":"budgets","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":178}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":177}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":178}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":177},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":178}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}