{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1433","title":"Report: ''Update of the Status of the North Little Rock School District's Implementation of its Desegregation Plan,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2008-06-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School buildings","School discipline","School facilities","School improvement programs","School employees","School management and organization","Student assistance programs","Student suspension","Dropouts"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Update of the Status of the North Little Rock School District's Implementation of its Desegregation Plan,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1433"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["73 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_813","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2008-01/2008-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/813"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nBOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA RECEIV JAN 15 2008 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIO/TNO R/tJG ass North Little Rock School District Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:30 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, January 17, 2008 -5:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Darrell Montgomery, President II. INVOCATION, Destiny Riddle , Glenview Elementary Third Grade Student, daughter of Brian \u0026amp; Carol Riddle III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Darrell Montgomery, President Scott Teague, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Margo Tenner, Member Ron Treat, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear l. Fellowship North Bible Church 2. Michael Huels, NLRHS East Campus Teacher B. Special Recognition - S. Brazear l. Arkansas Stock Market team from NLRHS East Campus Page 2 - Board Agenda January 17, 2008 VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, December 18, 2007 5:30 P.M. (Regular)- Page A- 1 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - S. Lasley B. Consider Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report - G. Tucker C. Consider Secondary Social Studies Textbook Adoption Committee - R. Dickey - Page B - 1 D. Consider Approval of Career Action Planning (CAP) Book - R. Dickey E. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider building use request - Page S - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Regular Board Meeting- Thursday, February 21, 2008 - 5:30 P.M. .e XI. XII. XIII. STUDENT EXPULSION Page 3 - Board Agenda January 17, 2008 SUPERINTENDENT'S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES December 18, 2007 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, December 18, 2007 in the Board Room of the A~ministration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Darrell Montgomery called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Hannah London, a NLRHS East Campus student, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Darrell Montgomery, President Scott Teague, Vice President Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer Trent Cox, Secretary John Riley, Parliamentarian Margo Tenner, Member Ron Treat, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDr. Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\npress\nadditional staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS - TV (video) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, introduced the following for Special Recognition: Each student in North Little Rock School received a watch from the Timex Corporation before the Christmas break. This generous gift was made possible by John Patitia of the Timex Corporation in conjunction with North Little Rock Chamber of Commerce's Kenda A-1 Ford and Terry Hartwick. All three were presented with a gift and plaque from Ron Treat. A The Board thanked them for making our students' Christmas brighter. W Jennifer Ouzts, Meadow Park Elementary Teacher, was recognized as for 2008 Arkansas State Teacher of the Year First Runner-up. Mrs. Ouzts introduced her husband, Jeff, and thanked him for his help. Her award consisted of $2,000 cash, weekend spa package at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs and computer software for her class. The Board thanked her for her great representation of our district. Rhonda Brown (L WMS), Amy Burks (CWE), Tammy Collier (RRMCS), Shelly Jones (L WMS), Dottie Murdaugh (RRMCS), Vandy Nash (IHE), Laura Ralston (IHE), Brigetta Starks (IRE), Artie Story (RRMCS), and Amy Van Pelt (LWMS) were honored for receiving their National Board Certifications. John Riley and Dorothy Williams gave a plaque and scarves to each of them and thanked them for their hard work. This certification is in effect for ten years and they are given $5,000 from the State and $2,000 from our District each year. AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA MOTION John Riley moved to include an Executive Session in the Action Items of New Business just before the Consent Agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING John Riley stated there was a typographical error on page A-4 of the minutes that the sentence: \"The Board also discussed changing the December Board member.\" should read \"The Board also discussed changing the December Board meeting.\" MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the minutes of the November 17, 2007 (Regular) meeting with the correction. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None OLD BUSINESS None A-2 NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Ely Moore, a member of the Certified Personnel Policies Committee, stated the committee had met. He said the committee discussed a few items and will possibly have proposals concerning early employee buyout plan, policies, and changes in the payment of tutoring program and homebound teachers at the January meeting. Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report Glenda Tucker, Classified Personnel Policies Committee Chairman, stated she wanted to talk with the Board concerning items from last month with the Board. Mrs. Tucker stated the proposal the Board sent back to the committee last month for further information to include a one-time appropriate percentage increase bonus payment for classified employees who were not stepping on the 2006-2007 salary schedule. Mrs. Tucker explained there were 170 employees and she feels they are due the same type of one-time compensation as the certified teachers received that were \"topped out\" in 2006-2007 school year. Mrs. Tucker also wanted the Board to adopt the Employee Separation Plan as presented for them in the November Board meeting. After a discussion with the Board, Mrs. Tucker and Greg Daniels, Chief Financial Officer, the following motions were presented: MOTION John Riley moved for the Administration to pursue a cost benefit analysis of an Early Separation Plan for the certified and classified employees of the North Little Rock School District. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams Cox Trent Cox moved to reject the Classified Personnel Policies Committee's proposal of a onetime bonus for the classified employees that were topped out in 2006-2007 and later review the 2007 - 2008. John TUiey seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None K- 6 Social Studies Textbook Committee's Recommendation Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education, presented the committee's recommendation of Harcourt School Publishers as their choice for the social studies textbooks beginning in the 2008 - 2009 school year. A-3 MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the Social Studies Textbook Adoption Committee's recommendation of Harcourt School Publishers for the 2008 - 2009 school year social studies textbooks. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Updated Master Facilities Plan Resolution Jerry Massey, Plant Services Director, presented the Master Facility Plan tabs for the approval of the Board. BREAK IN THE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS CONCERNING THE MASTER FACILITY PLAN. Melinda Kinnison, NLR PT A Council President and mother of two NLRSD students, spoke to the Board and stated she was concerned the aging facilities in our District. She appreciated the vision of the Board and reminded them of the progress that has occurred at UAMS in the last eighteen years. The Board reconvened the meeting. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the following recommendation. Margo Tenner seconded the motion. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Education of the North Little Rock School District approves the tabs of the Master Facility Plan as presented and required by February 1, 2008 in the office of the State of Arkansas' Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation. WHEREAS, the North Little Rock School District Board of Education, on this 18th day of December 2007, recognizes this approval action will assist as one of many components of the regulatory Master Facility Plan information. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Bill Spainhour and Jennifer Amox, NLRHS Band Directors from NLRHS West Campus and East Campus respectively, addressed the Board and explained the importance of students being involved with band along with the needs and wants of the band program. Instrument and parts are very expensive and their budgets are very limited. The Board thanked them for their time and presentation. A-4 Sheila Baker, Cecil Gibson, and Susan Miller updated the Board and clarified the NLRSD General Education Degree program at Shorter College. They explained the process of student participation and this being the only degree option left after a student has not been successful in obtaining the required number of credits to graduate from high school. Ms. Baker and Mr. Gibson thanked the Board for continuing this program for the young adults of North Little Rock. The Board went into closed Executive Session at 8: 15 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 9:00 p.m. Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel recommended the Board accept the information on pages O - 1 through T - 27 as printed in the agenda. MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the consent agenda as printed. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None STUDENT EXPULSIONS Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation, and Fran Jackson, Student Services Director, presented the Board with four recommendations for expulsion. Mrs. Jackson recommended that Taz Marteny, a Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Seventh grader, be expelled for the current semester and the following semester for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor guardian/parent attended the meeting. MOTION Margo Tenner moved to accept the Administration's recommendation for the expulsion of Taz Marteny for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Mr. Acklin recommended that Demetrius Austin, a NLRHS East Campus School Ninth grader, be expelled for the current semester and the following semester for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor guardian/parent attended the meeting. A-5 MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administration's recommendation for the expulsion of Demetrius Austin for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Mr. Acklin recommended that Jacob Clinton Ellis, a NLRHS East Campus School Ninth grader, be expelled for the current semester and the following semester for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor guardian/parent attended the meeting. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administration's recommendation for the expulsion of Jacob Clinton Ellis for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Mr. Acklin recommended that Carlos Thomas, a NLRHS East Campus School Ninth grader, be expelled for the current semester and the following semester for violation of Board Policy 4.22 Weapons and Dangerous Instruments. Neither the student nor guardian/parent attended the meeting. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administration's recommendation for the expulsion of Carlos Austin for violation of Board Policy 4.22 Weapons and Dangerous Instruments. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None ADJOURNMENT MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to adjourn the meeting. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None A-6 President Montgomery declared the meeting adjourned at 9: 11 p.m. Darrell Montgomery, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-7 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT -TO: Kenneth Kirspel, Superintendent FROM: Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education SUBJECT: Secondary Social Studies Adoption Committee DATE: December 20, 2007 Recommendation for the Secondary Social Studies Adoption Committee 2007-2008 Name Subject School Sharon Otwell Soc. St. Dept. Chair Rose City Middle Dottie Murdaugh Soc. St. Dept. Chair Ridgeroad Middle Charter Emily Dumas Social St. Teacher Ridgeroad Middle Charter Shanon Neumier Soc. St. Dept. Chair Lakewood Middle Wendy Grissom Parent Lakewood Middle Dinah Allen GT Facilitator Lakewood Middle Meredith Shipman ESL Teacher Lakewood Middle Michele Wasson Soc. St. Dept. Chair East Campus Todd Huff Civics Teacher East Campus Christy Klucher World Hist. Teacher East Campus Meredith Williams Psychology Teacher East Campus Becky Belew Special Ed. Teacher East Campus Tammy Petty Soc. St. Dept. Chair West Campus Lisa Doss IB History Teacher West Campus Gwen Hammonds AP Psych. Teacher West Campus Phyllis McDonald Principal Rose City Middle Suzanne Sims Parent West Campus Eleanor Lindsey Parent Lakewood Middle Maria Touchstone ESL Coordinator Administration Rhonda Dickey Admin. Dir. of Sec. Ed. Administration Angela Olsen Asst. Supt. Curriculum \u0026amp; Inst. Administration B-1 I - Local Revenue Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Rentals Contributions/Donations Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue From Intermediate Source I Severance Tax I Other Revenue from County Tota I From Intermediate Revenue From State Sources Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding Additional Base Funding Other Unrestricted Grants-in-Aid Tota I from State Sources Revenue from State Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Tota I State Restricted 0th er Sources-Nonrevenue Tot Tot Bui Insurance Reimbursement Sale of Equipment al Other Sources al Revenue Operations lding Fund Capital Outlay Fund Federal Fund Child NutritionF und TOTAL REVENUE North Little Rock School District Accounting Period 6 - December 2007 2007-2008 %of Current Month Budget Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Balance $12,750,000.00 $7,762,751.64 $11,720,801.72 $1,029,198.28 91.93% $6,500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,500,000.00 0.00% $1,645,000.00 $586,533.58 $731,536.65 $913,463.35 44.47% $310,000.00 $0.00 $2,205.38 $307,794.62 0.71% $220,000.00 $16,678.69 $82,080.71 $137,919.29 37.31% $190,000.00 $97,528.31 $105,409.08 $84,590.92 55.48% $112,000.00 $5,274.32 $12,091.22 $99,908.78 10.80% $1,000,000.00 $0.00 $252,632.77 $747,367.23 25.26% $79,000.00 $18,372.56 $21,961.35 $57,038.65 27.80% $16,500.00 $6,130.96 $16,480.96 $19.04 99.88% $27,560.00 $4,759.50 $7,759.50 $19,800.50 28.15% $61,600.00 $44,255.02 $103,222.05 -$41,622.05 167.57% $22,911,660.00 $8,542,284.58 $13,056,181.39 $9,855,478.61 56.98% $7,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,600.00 0.00% $2,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,600.00 0.00% $10,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,200.00 0.00% $35,682,179.00 $3,243,834.00 $16,219,170.00 $19,463,009.00 45.45% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $450,000.00 $41,079.00 $205,395.00 $244,605.00 45.64% $2,000.00 $0.00 $1,750.00 $250.00 87.50% $36,134,179.00 $3,284,913.00 $16,426,315.00 $19,707,864.00 45.46% $550,000.00 $0.00 $475,960.49 $74,039.51 86.54% $4,843,680.00 $324,495.00 $2,091,873.00 $2,751,807.00 43.19% $2,757,440.00 $229,648.00 $1,534,989.06 $1,222,450.94 55.67% $7,120,000.00 $580,689.09 $3,323,506.76 $3,796,493.24 46.68% $431,870.00 $2,590.91 $271,711.01 $160,158.99 62.91% $15,702,990.00 $1,137,423.00 $7,698,040.32 $8,004,949.68 49.02% $110,000.00 $11,977.71 $23,513.34 $86,486.66 21.38% $9,000.00 $0.00 $998.00 $8,002.00 11.09% $119,000.00 $11,977.71 $24,511.34 $94,488.66 20.60% $74,878,029.00 $12,976,598.29 $37,205,048.05 $37,672,980.95 49.69% $2,034,000.00 $3,100.00 $1,147,972.04 $886,027.96 56.44% $1,5so.ooo.ool $643,329.841 $956,482.961 $593,517.041 61.71%1 $6, 758,on .oo I $79,589.851 $454,695.991 $6,3o3,3a1.01 I 6.73%1 $4,050,000.ool $665,583.711 $1,564,534.841 $2,485,465.16 I 38.63%1 I $89,210,106.001 $14,36a,201.69I $41,328,733.8al $47,941,312.121 46.30%1 0-1 Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOTAL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof IT ech Services Purchased Property Services Other Purchased Services Supplies and Materials Property Other Objects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND BUILDING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FEDERAL FUND CHILD NUTRITION FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES North Little Rock School District Accounting Period 06 - December 2007 2007-2008 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $38,893,280.00 $3,572,286.91 $15,924,686.87 $10,240,008.00 $902,867.82 $4,205,187.31 $10,077,195.00 $984,438.53 $5,275,635.23 $3,359,720.00 $335,463.29 $1,709,850.25 $62,570,203.00 $5,795,056.55 $27,115,359.66 $1,248,946.00 $157,199.54 $479,380.17 $968,420.00 $72,038.96 $481,910.70 $1,881,482.00 $723,749.42 $2,284,698.45 $4,958,847.00 $324,441.55 $2,799,340.97 $184,050.00 $0.00 $29,291.65 $111,859.00 $6,467.85 $69,781.71 $2,745,265.00 $22,257.99 $1,880,934.13 $12,098,869.00 $1,306,155.31 $8,025,337.78 $74,669,072.00 $7,101,211.86 $35,140,697.44 $8,650,490.00 $323,112.51 $2,713,746.58 $1,791,824.00 $22,386.31 $834,505.45 $4,294,620.09 $521,458.54 $2,846,781.95 $4,028,186.48 $449,986.45 $2,192,027.33 $93,434,192.57 $8,418,155.67 $43,727,758.75 0-2 % of Budget Budget Balance Balance $22,968,593.13 40.94% $6,034,820.69 41.07% $4,801,559.77 52.35% $1,649,869.75 50.89% $35,454,843.34 43.34% $769,565.83 38.38% $486,509.30 49.76% -$403,216.45 121.43% $2,159,506.03 56.45% $154,758.35 15.92% $42,077.29 62.38% $864,330.87 68.52% $4,073,531.22 66.33% $39,528,374.56 47.06% $5,936,743.42 31.37% $957,318.55 46.57% $1,447,838.14 66.29% $1,836,159.15 54.42% $49,706,433.82 46.80% NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Board Agenda-January 17, 2008 NEW ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: EXPERIENCE: LICENSURE: RECOMMENDATION: Susan Shurley Director of Special Services Bachelor's Degree - UALR, 1988 Master's Degree- Harding University, 1998 England School District, Elementary Teacher, 1989 - 1993 Lonoke School District, Elementary Teacher, 1993 - 1997 NLRSD, East Campus, Special Education Teacher, 1997 - 2002 NLRSD, Poplar Street Middle, Asst. Principal, 2002 - 2006 Ark. Dept. of Ed., Area Supervisor - Special Education, 2006 - to present Elementary K-6\nSpecial Ed. Supervisor\nMildly Handicapped K-12\nElementary Principal\nSecondary Principal\nCurriculum Specialist K-12\nSupervisor Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Rellia Dillinger, Coordinator of Special Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND TERMINATIONS Laura Pinckley Seventh Street Elementary - Second Grade Teacher Effective 01-12-08 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING : RECOMMENDATION: Emily Martinez Art Teacher, Lynch Drive/Meadow Park Elementary Effective 01/08/08, Category III, Step 1, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - Harding University, 5/2005 Art P-8, 7-12 NLRHS - West Campus, 9/07-10/07 Seventh Street Elementary, 11/07 - 12/07 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-1 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION (CONTINUED) NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING : RECOMMENDATION: Cory Parham e Special Education Teacher - Tri-District Early Childhood Program Effective 01/02/08, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Bachelor's Degree- University of Central Arkansas, 12/2007 Initial 3 year Ida Burns Elementary, Conway, 8/2007 -12/2007 Thelma Jasper, Coordinator of Early Childhood Development Program Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel NAME: _ Sarah Taylor PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Special Education Teacher - Tri-District Early Childhood Program EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE STUDENT TEACHING : RECOMMENDATION: Effective O 1/02/08, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Master's Degree - University of Central Arkansas, 12/2007 Initial 3 year Mayflower Elementary, 1/2005 - 5/2005 Easter Seals of Arkansas, 8/2007 - 12/2007 Thelma Jasper, Coordinator of Early Childhood Development Program Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Carri Williams Fourth Grade Teacher - North Heights Elementary Effective 12/10/07, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 12/2007 Pending North Heights Elementary, 3/2007 - 5/2007 Dana Snowden, Principal, North Heights Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGN A TIO NS Saneicia Hall Annette King Fredale Nellums Terra Rhodes Rolisa Rylan NLRHS West Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant 12-05-07 Maintenance Department - Custodian 12-14-07 Crestwood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant 12-03-07 Boone Park Elementary - Lunch Period Aide 12-19-07 Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant 12-03-07 P-2 Warren Green Ruthie Hughes Veronica Phillips Romonda Young CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From Maintenance Department - Custodian To Crestwood Elementary-Custodian From North Heights Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant To Belwood Elementary-Child Nutrition Assistant From Boone Park Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant To North Heights Elementary- Child Nutrition Assistant From Belwood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant To Boone Park Elementary-Child Nutrition Assistant NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Tara Duggar Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-17-07, Schedule 8CN, Rangel-01, 181 days Milagros Hogendyk ---- Poplar Street Middle - Secretary Effective 1-10-08, Schedule 8Cx, Range I-03, 205 days P-3 ~= FAX NO. :5017778206 Jan. 07 2008 02:4SPM P3 01/07/2008 14:31 5017718069 NLR sa-ro..s PArE. 02/02 DeannaS l\\lart 'to Mr. Bury Kin\u0026lt;il NLR lligh School Pial) lle: 501.771.8000 :Fa ,: SO l. 771, 8069 Re: Auditorium l\\ental [)far Mr. l\u0026lt;iocl: 501-223 -0234 ..  . From: Oei:fre ffar.llsQn Broadway Stars 501.680.8300 501.223.C\u0026gt;234 p.1 W i: are a da.neea nd musical theatre studio providing trablill@to students. . =s3 up and again WO\\Jlldik e to tent. tho Bast campusa uditoriumt or our annual productionM. onday, Juriel 6m and Tuesday June t 1'11 w,,uld be an ideal productionc !.akfio r us, boweverw e rould a11ioC Of\\!ider~fonda.Jyu,n e ~and Tue$day June! OraT. he wcdctmdo f June1 4tha nd 1s1'w ould be our th.iti1c hoice.A n:,thero ption would be the . w ~ oC May 31\"' and June 1 . Jf there i1 another-tlme ~roen the end :if'Ma)' aod the middle of Tu no thqt wauld be bettet for the $Choal, pl~e advise. If you need furtheri nfurmation,l can be reached at 501. 680.S'.5OOT. hank) Qll1s o much~ your c, ir,sideratioWn-e appreciatyeo ura ssistancea JJdw e ue ~~ aboutt he post1ibilitoyfr entittg youc u cility. 1 llanks again t r ei.d.tHt aralson I[))~~~ ~ ~ w~ 'D'-- ln)~v0 6 200]1 l!d}i FINANCE/PURCHASll[G/AUDITI .:.::..?. Ji\", J.'/,:._-_!\n! .:r,1,',.:../f,':'.'l,.,,~\n. if~ :--.:.:._1:~ . .~ -t,:.:.,~,, 1\n!., :(, !'\n,... ~.\n.' ... /1,1 {.:\n:!.[,, ~,.! ~!,: --~.. .: . ..:.._. .'-:-,..\n._! .~r: ! _tt. . :...:1,. ,,.:~! ~ .' :,:\n_::-\\ :~.h' :!~ : -::_:\n:.: \n~ ......1. J,, ,111l ,.I ..\n./.:.:_:~. r\n,. .., ,1, ,: S-1 January 8, 2008 Mr. Barry Kincl, Director of Purchasing The North Little Rock Public Schools Administrative Offices 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, AR 72115-0687 Dear Mr. Kincl: Park Hill Baptist Church would like to reserve the North Little Rock High School East Campus Auditorium for a Celebration Installation Worship Service in which we anticipate the opportunity to welcome our new pastor. I realize to secure final approval our request will be forwarded to the North Little Rock Board of Education for their authorization. We would like to utilize the East Campus Auditorium and Mini Auditorium on Sunday morning, February 24, 2008. I have previously discussed this request with Lee Tackett, Principal of East Campus High School, and Mike Klutcher, head of the Drama Department at the East Campus High School. Thank you for your kind consideration. Please feel free to contact me if I can provide further information. May God bless you and yours! Warmest Regards, IID)~t~~W~'[)'~ :lrill JAN 0~ 2008 ll!::V IF INANCE/PURCHAASUIDNIGT/ North Little Rock School District Check Listingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 . '. '\n'.Z'ittiti'. \" .,,. ... 104909 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 127.00 104910 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY 1781.50 104912 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #85 7052.83 104913 AMERICAN PAPER \u0026amp; TWINE CO 737.45 104914 AMERICAN SPEECH-LANG, HEA 3800.00 104916 ANTHONY CONNORS 85.00 104917 AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. 377.55 104918 AR SPANISH INTERPRETER TR 98.00 104919 ARCOM SYSTEMS 285.00 ' 104920 ARKANSAS STATE POLICE 481.25 104921 ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY INC 248.73 104922 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 1213.55 104923 BARNES AND NOBLE 214.15 104924 BARRY STURGES 60.00 104925 BASICS PLUS 9640.31 104926 BILL DUVALL - TECHNOLOGY 96.97 104927 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 30.00 104928 BOKARI A WILLIAMS 25.00 104929 BRIGHT APPLE 57.49 104930 BROUKE REYNOLDS-WEST CAMP 33.97 104931 CABOT FLORISTS 134.46 104932 CALLOWAY HOUSE INC 214.60 104933 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 275.40 104934 CHARLES UTLEY-COMPUTER SE 68.24 104935 CHICK-FIL-A 562.50 - 104936 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 101. 07 104937 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO IN 918.00 104938 CLASSROOM DIRECT 2307.62 104939 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 28.25 104940 COCA-COLA USA 1493.20 104941 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 162.37 104942 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 1723.49 104943 COUSINS VIDEO 134.40 Page T-1 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 104944 CRAIG EDWARDS 275.00 104945 DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS 306.01 104946 DELTA EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; SUPPLY 7374.60 104947 DEMCO 781.07 104948 DERRICK GREENWOOD 30.00 104949 DIDAX 279.56 104950 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 525.60 104951 DR ANGELA OLSEN 295.54 104952 GERDAU-AMERISTEEL 65.88 104953 ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA 49.00 104954 FLYNCO INC. 127860.69 104955 GARY L STEPHENS 37.50 104956 GOODMAN DISTRIBUTION INC 18.00 104957 GRAINGER 323.75 104958 GREEK 4 LIFE 1242.16 104959 HELPING HAND CHILDRENS TH 687.50 104960 HIGHSMITH INC 282.09 104961 HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY 503.26 104962 HOWARD ROSS 100.00 104963 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 1404.31 104964 INTERNATIONAL READING ASS 550.00 104965 J-A PROPERTY MANAGEMENTL 1500.00 104966 JACK,NELSON,JONES,FINK,JI 4857.00 104967 JAMES E GIVENS 70.00 104968 JANISE GIBSON 30.00 104969 JATINA GIBSON 30.00 104970 JENNIFER CONNER 25.00 104971 .JIMMY E WALKER 90.00 104972 JUST FOR KIDS 780.00 104973 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING co 82.50 104974 KENNETH A KIRSPEL 500.00 104975 LEWIS \u0026amp; LEE DISTRIBUTING 3066.52 104976 LITTLE CASESAR'S PIZZA 111.00 104977 LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. 423.42 Page T-2 North Little Rock School District CheckL istingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 104978 LUCI A STEPHENS 37.50 104979 M \u0026amp; M ENTERPRISES 400.00 104980 MAISHA NICOLE JONES 25.00 104981 MAVIS CHERRY 19.43 104983 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 5325.00 104984 MINDWARE-ACCOUNT RECEIVAB 39.40 104985 MOBILE MINI LLC AK 147.02 104986 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 551.20 104987 NAEIR 80.88 104988 NANCY STEWART 262.13 104989 NAPA AUTO PARTS 62. 65 104990 NATALIE CASS 28.27 104991 NATIONAL SCHOOL PRODUCTS 247.27 104992 NATL. COUNCIL OF TEACHERS 135.00 104993 NLR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 550.00 104994 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 356.00 104995 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 207.70 104996 NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY 1539.00 104997 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITI 31.47 104998 OFFICE DEPOT 175.54 104999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION M 57747.00 105000 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 89.55 105001 PAM WILCOX-7TH STREET 2 4 6. 92 105002 PEACHTREE BUSINESS PRODUC 141.50 105003 PERFECTION LEARNING CORP. 68.92 105004 PFG LITTLE ROCK 29489.80 105005 PHYLLIS THOMPSON 25.00 105006 PLANK ROAD PUBLISHING 213.37 105007 POE TRAVEL 2481.50 105008 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 128.45 105009 POSTMASTER, SHERWOOD 41.00 105010 PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS 243.76 105011 REBECCA R CARR 3368.75 105012 REFLECTIONS 430.28 Page T-3 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105013 REGINALD MARTIN 140.00 105014 REMEDIA PUBLICATIONS INC 91. 99 105015 REXEL DAVIES 108.47 105016 RHONDA DICKEY 18.35 105017 RIVERSIDE BOX SUPPLY co 731.00 105018 ROZ NEWTON 58.95 105019 RUSSELL CHEVROLET co 78.81 105020 S \u0026amp; S WORLDWIDE 270.43 105022 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 154.94 105023 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC 185.55 105024 SCHOLASTIC INC 55.60 105025 SCHOOL HEALTH CORPORATION 2893.64 105026 SCHOOL NURSE SUPPLY INC 314.50 105027 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 3895.95 105028 SHEILA BAKER 25.90 105029 SHRED-IT 97.50 105030 SOUTHEAST AR EDUCATION SE 1040.00 105031 SOUTHPAW ENTERPRISES 389.82 105032 SPEEDSKIN 198.05 105033 STACY L JOSHUA-SMITH 55.00 105034 STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR EDU 2220.00 105035 STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR EDU 658.00 105036 STANLEY HARDWARE CO 117.75 105037 STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO INC 10.56 105038 SUPER DUPER INC 86.70 105039 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARK 33812.25 105040 TAGGART FOSTER CURRENCE G 4240.29 105041 TAMMY COLLIER 227.65 105042 TANKERSLEY FOODSERVICE 10982.25 105043 TEACHER DIRECT 212.38 105044 TEACHERS MEDIA COMPANY 229.06 105045 TEACHERS PET 221. 40 105046 THE CENTER FOR LEARNING 67.00 105047 THE GRAY CENTER 42.40 Page T-4 North little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105048 THE OUTSIDER POWER CLEANI 125.00 105049 THE TIMES 44.00 105050 THOMAS ISGRIG 25.00 105051 TRANE PARTS CENTER OF ARK 123.89 105052 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 998.06 105053 TRIARCO ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS 111.90 105054 TROUTMAN OIL CO INC 25158.17 105055 TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITH 30.24 105056 UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERV 15016.60 105057 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARK 300.00 105058 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 4037.85 105059 VERNIER SOFTWARE \u0026amp; TECHNO 2673.85 105060 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 947.54 105061 WILLIAM GUMBY 64.64 105062 WILLIE JONES 85.00 105063 ZEPHYR PRESS 86.29 105064 ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS-PR 179.00 105065 AFLAC 25.10 105066 AMANDA CHAUDION 48.36 105067 ANITA POPE 1. 26 105068 CHRISTINE BROWN 20.35 105069 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 21. 88 105070 CONSECO LIFE 10.58 105071 JOE ANN AUSTIN 9.70 105072 MARY SYDNEY HESS 1. 20 105073 MET LIFE 155.78 105074 PAULA VASQUEZ-PARK HILL 1. 80 105075 US ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 9.15 105076 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 65.20 105077 WILLIE DUNCAN 9.88 105078 ALL FOR KIDZ 857.00 105079 ARKANSAS ALTACARE 31626.00 105080 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 3987.97 105081 CHARLA KAY.BURKETT 4000.00 Page T-5 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105082 ELIZABETH CLEMONS 320.00 105083 ENERGY EDUCATION INC 20200.00 105084 HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY 498.37 105085 J W PEPPER \u0026amp; SON 162.09 105086 MARTHA NORTON 3937.50 105087 METHODIST DAY TREATMENT s 5500.00 105088 MICHELE WASSON 1185.31 105089 RHONDA BROWN 176.94 105090 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 622.77 105091 ALAN CROWNOVER - MAINTENA 217.03 105092 ANGELA GOVAN-GLENVIEW 40.42 105093 ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS AS 985.00 105094 BOBBY TRAFFANSTEDT 28.38 105095 BRENDA BUTLER-WEST CAMPUS 62.35 105096 CAROLYN GARRETT 196.91 105097 DREW CAMP-SPECIAL SERVICE 77.84 105098 ELIZABETH HART 47.34 105099 GLADYS SWIFT-LWMS 330.59 105100 GLORIA SMITH 47.43 105101 HOLLY SCHIMMEL 78.39 105102 JACQUELINE SUMLER 77.14 105103 JAMES W WOODARD-SPECIAL s 37.02 105104 JAMIE EUBANKS 1400.00 105105 JERRY MASSEY 160.39 105106 KATHRYN HALE-MEADOW PARK 10.88 105107 KRISTIE RATLIFF 43.90 105108 LARA HUMPHRIES 1470.00 105109 LAURA JENNINGS FOOD SERVI 34.66 105110 LAURA WINTERS 79.08 105111 LEANN NANNEN 143.92 105113 LYNDA SISCO 226.83 105114 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 216.38 105115 MICHEELA J EUBANK 693.00 105116 PAM FERGUSON 86.86 Page T-6 North little Rock School District Check listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105117 PHYLLIS MCDONALD-RCMS 23.14 105118 RELLIA DILLINGER 121.78 105119 RITA LOVENSTEIN 25.80 105120 SHARON ELDRED 69.66 105121 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 1655.34 105122 VAN COMPTON 2588.75 105123 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 172.04 105124 ALISHA HERRING 187.60 105125 AMBOY ELEMENTARY ACTIVITY 112.83 105126 AMY VOLLMAN 99.33 105127 ANDRIA SMITH 105.74 105128 ANGIE COLCLASURE 86.90 105129 ANGIE JOHNSON 34.49 105130 ARCOM SYSTEMS 2090.00 105131 ARKANSAS STATE POLICE 19.25 105132 AUTISM EDUCATION \u0026amp; SUPPOR 916.00 105133 BARNES AND NOBLE 492.52 105134 BRANDY NESSELRODT 162.54 105135 BRENDA CREWS 30.00 105136 BROOKE BRICKER-EARLY CHIL 85.66 105137 CABOT FLORISTS 45.73 105138 CASSIE MCCLINTON 21. 50 105139 CINDY BECKETT 42.19 105140 CLARA LOFTON-PSMS 28.80 105141 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH 781.38 105142 CORPORATE EXPRESS 446.51 105143 CRYSTAL EVANS 99.33 105144 DANA MCCOY 101.95 105145 DANA MORGAN 162.42 105146 DAWNE CARROLL-EARLY CHILD 29.67 105147 DEMCO 2917.88 105148 DOROTHY FARRIS 99.07 105149 FRANKLIN COVEY 200.12 105150 GLADYS MCDONALD 9.24 Page T-7 North Little Rock School District Check Listingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 105151 INDEPENDENT MUSIC SERVICE 135.00 105152 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 386.51 105153 JANET FOSTER 288.13 105154 JANICE KUCALA-EAST CAMPUS 79.98 105155 JOHN HAYNIE 16.15 105156 JOSTENS 3862.32 105157 JUDITH QUATTLEBAUM 41. 00 105158 KAREN COLEMAN 22.89 105159 KATE ECK-EARLY CHILDHOOD 100.75 105160 KETCHER \u0026amp; CO INC 89.95 105161 KEVA RODGERS 99.76 105162 KIM REYNOLDS 138.80 105163 KRISTEN MADDOX 57.62 105164 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HIL 107.79 105165 LAUREN WALKER 78.17 105166 LESLIE HUFFMAN EARLY CHIL 65.62 105167 LESLIE KREBS 39.96 105168 LOWE'S 1319.94 105169 MARSHA MAJORS 96.44 105170 MARY JEAN BOTTS 34.94 105171 MICHELLE BONES-WEST CAMPU 17.07 105172 MINDY CARROLL 111.54 105173 NLRSD TRANS PORAT ION DEPT 143.75 105174 NLRSD WAREHOUSE 2800.00 105175 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVI 52.20 105176 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOLS 581.25 105177 OFFICE DEPOT 58.92 105178 PAM FERGUSON 57.19 105179 PETSMART 100.00 105180 PULASKI COUNTY SPEC. SHOO 275.00 105181 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1773.00 105182 RAYMOND SMITH 242.35 105183 REBECCA WINTERS 196.64 105184 RHONDA BANKS 26.32 Page T-8 North Little Rock School District Check listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105185 SAMANTHA CURRAN 48.38 105186 SAMANTHA GODKIN 70.99 105187 SARAH CHILDERS 122.59 105188 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 2493.74 105189 SCHOLASTIC INC 75.38 105190 SHARON POOLE 158.80 105191 SHERI HAMLIN 95.35 105192 SOUTHEAST AR EDUCATION SE 75.00 105193 STACY DUNCAN 134.13 105194 SUSAN M HYDEN 126.12 105195 TEACHERS PET 2112.08 105196 TERRI FRENCH 89.18 105197 THE TIMES 219.00 105198 TRI-STATES VIDEO 310.67 105199 UALR 2783.10 105200 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 371. 8 6 105201 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 149.47 105202 ANTHONY CANTRELL 20.00 105203 ANTONIO R GIVAN 30.00 105204 BARRY STURGES 70.00 105205 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 50.00 105206 BRAD BOLDING 20.00 105207 DAMONICA D BROWN 20.00 105208 DANIEL J FLOYD 12.50 105209 FRED HOKES 85.00 105210 GARY L STEPHENS 62.50 105211 GARY E ADAMS JR 70.00 105212 JACQUES MUMFORD 30.00 105213 JANISE GIBSON 20.00 105214 JESSIE MCVAY 30.00 105215 LISA GRAY 20.00 105216 LUCI A STEPHENS 62.50 105217 MARVIN LOVE 70.00 105218 OTIS RAY BANKS 20.00 Page T-9 North little Rock School District Check listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105219 PATSY A RHODES 20.00 105220 RANDALL H SANDEFUR 20.00 105221 RANDY BROWN 20.00 105222 SARAH SHEPPARD 20.00 105223 SUNNY MILLER 85.00 105224 THOMAS E ANDERSON 80.00 105225 THOMAS W OLLIE SR 20.00 105226 YOLANDA GIBSON 20.00 105227 WILLIAM ZACHARY WATSON 20.00 105228 ARCOM SYSTEMS 2159.59 105229 BARNES AND NOBLE 754.93 105230 BOBBIE J RIGGINS-ANNEX 371.70 105231 CEDRIC BLACK 15.10 105232 COCA-COLA USA 995.00 105233 CORPORATE EXPRESS 1177.48 105234 DEBORAH LUTZ 18.83 105235 HEINEMANN 27.50 105236 RUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 45.93 105237 JUST FOR KIDS 495.00 105238 LENISHA BROADWAY-RRMS 12.56 105239 LINDA MOSES 225.00 105240 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 122.19 105241 MEREDITH SHIPMAN-LWMS 23.26 105242 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 256.66 105243 OFFICE DEPOT 259.05 105244 PEARSON LEARNING GROUP 44.91 105245 PROFESSIONAL FORMS \u0026amp; SUPP 126.00 105246 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 147.55 105247 SCHOOL \u0026amp; OFFICE PRODUCTS 1080.38 105248 SHANDA COLEMAN 10.06 105249 SHERRI PETTIT 21.50 105250 SOURCE 4 1952.78 105251 TOYS R us 56.63 105252 TRACEE RAINEY 144.87 Page T-10 North Little Rock School District Check Listingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 105261 TURNER DAIRY 25090.74 105262 UCA 1875.00 1052 63 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 146.91 1052 64 WEST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 6.00 105322 AEA 489.27 105323 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 197.50 105324 AFLAC 612.60 105325 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 300.00 105326 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 38848.31 105327 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 63.27 105328 AUDRIANNA GRISHAM ATTY 155.37 105329 BANK OF THE OZARKS 58830.61 105330 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 546.00 105331 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 105332 CINTAS 116.87 105333 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 124.14 105334 CONSECO LIFE 5.29 105335 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 48.86 105336 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 105337 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 83.09 105338 DELTA DENTAL 3588.40 105339 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 9287.01 105340 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 34282.75 105341 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 537.50 105342 ING SERVICE CENTER 180.00 105343 JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE 175.38 105344 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 499.39 105345 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN, TRUS 373.00 105346 KEVMAR CAPITAL CORP 25.00 105347 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 3995.65 105348 MET LIFE 709.49 105349 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 5374.82 105350 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 314.00 105351 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 1176.21 Page T-11 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105352 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL 354.32 105353 OCSE 1789.56 105354 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 286.39 105355 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1852.57 105356 ST VINCENT HEALTH SYSTEM 20.00 105357 TASC 208.16 105358 u s ABLE LIFE 173.40 105359 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 561.79 105360 u s ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 4.93 105361 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 1563.57 105362 u s DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 59.68 105363 u s DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE 100.93 105364 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 57.00 105365 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 27.90 105366 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 910.00 105367 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 556.50 105368 AAEA 200.00 105369 ABO PUBLICATIONS 53.90 105370 AHA PROCESS INCORPORATED 590.00 105371 ALLIED PRINTING \u0026amp; SUPPLY 70.85 105372 AMANDA WARE 447.77 105373 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 27.21 105374 ARCLISTA JUNE STORY 205.42 105375 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE 1637.74 105376 ARKANSAS QUEEN RIVERBOAT 1512.85 105377 ARKANSAS TURBO 1276.03 105378 AT\u0026amp;T 86.81 105379 ATELCO 756.56 105380 BACKGROUND INFO SYS. OF A 200.00 105381 BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES 425.74 105382 BARNES AND NOBLE 191.40 105383 BENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL 50.00 105384 BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE 399.60 105385 BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE 567.00 Page T-12 North Little Rock School District Check Listingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 105386 BOILER INSPECTION DIVISIO 3173.00 105387 BOKARI WILLIAMS-RRMS 153.53 105388 BRAYE VALENTINE 48.00 105389 BRIAN BOYD 55.00 105390 BRITTON MANESS 48.00 105391 CABOT FLORISTS 152.52 105392 CAMBIUM LEARNING INC 5478.56 105393 CAROL CLARK 12.70 105394 CAROL THORNTON 115.61 105395 CARRIE E MELLINGER 44.00 105396 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 52.61 105397 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES 67 6. 5 7 105398 CHRISTINA TOOTLE-WEST 37.07 105399 CLARA LOFTON-PSMS 277.80 105400 CLASSROOM DIRECT 377.67 105401 CLASSROOM PRODUCTS WAREHO 1874.34 105402 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 40.12 105403 COBB \u0026amp; SUSKIE LTD 14137.50 105404 COMMUNICATIONS PLUS 109.90 105405 COREY HENDRICKS 44.00 105406 CORNELIUS ROBERTS 90.00 105407 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT# 2120.93 105408 COUSINS VIDEO 112.00 105409 CROW BURLINGAME CO 97.03 105410 CRYSTAL SPRINGS BOOKS 110.25 105412 DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS 29555.89 105413 DEBORAH HORN 13000.00 105414 DEMCO 637.43 105415 DESTINATION IMAGINATION 235.00 105416 DETCO INDUSTRIES 1983.14 105418 DR ANGELA OLSEN 54.00 105419 DRAMATIC PUBLISHING co 465.19 105420 DUSTIN THOMPSON 44.00 105421 EAST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 270.00 Page T-13 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105422 EDUPRO GROUP 869.00 105423 ELECTRONIC VIDEO SYSTEMS 237.60 105424 ELENA FRIOT 35.00 105425 ELENA REYES-LOVINS 74.65 105426 ENCYCLOPEDIA CENTER, INC. 679.00 105427 ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATION 525.00 105428 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLIGIE 250.00 105429 ETA CUISENAIRE 544.50 105430 FLORIDA MIC-RO 4357.50 105431 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 476.03 105432 GERARD M FRANCIS 70.00 105433 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY ACTIV 24.60 105434 GRAINGER 315.36 105435 HANNAH FAULKNER 44.00 105436 HARDING UNIVERSITY 30.00 105437 HASLER FINANCIAL SERVICES 46.89 105438 HAYES SCHOOL PUBLISHING C 40.71 105439 HOME DEPOT/GECF 267.85 105440 HOWARD ROSS 75.00 105441 HOM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 16.12 105442 ILLUSTRATED SPORTSWEAR 583.90 105443 INDEPENDENT MUSIC SERVICE 150.00 105444 INFORMATION VAULTING SERV 153.40 105445 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 2219.43 105446 J K ATHLETICS 3234.44 105447 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 423.00 105448 JS PRINTING 330.00 105449 JCCA 1500.00 105450 JERRY MASSEY 139.21 105451 JERRY MASSEY 440.00 105452 JIMMY E WALKER 90.00 105453 JONES SCHOOL SUPPLY CO IN 75.25 105454 JUDITH QUATTLEBAUM 67.00 105455 JULIE ASHER 21. 25 Page T-14 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105456 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING CO 24.90 105457 KASN-KLRT FOX 16 2595.66 105458 KAYE LOWE - CENTRAL OFFIC 44.24 105459 KELLIE SHEFFIELD 55.00 105460 KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY co 63.53 105461 LEARNING4TODAY 140.00 105462 LINDSEYS HOSPITALITY HOUS 274.75 105463 LINDY THOMPSON 10.80 105464 LORI HARMS 986.20 105465 M J COMMUNICATIONS 1890.00 105466 MATTHEW BENDER \u0026amp; co INC 118.32 105467 MELISSA CANNON 131.37 105468 MICHELE WASSON 1382.05 105469 MICHELLE NEEDLER 105.49 105470 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 230.00 105471 MONOPRICE, INC 35.10 105472 MORRILTON HIGH SCHOOL QUI 50.00 105473 MOUNT VERNON-ENOLA QUIZ B 100.00 105474 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 2064.96 105475 NAPA AUTO PARTS 285.46 105476 NASCO 377.50 105477 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 15452.74 105478 NLR WELDING SUPPLY 87.16 105479 NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY 106.92 105480 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITI 1116.73 105481 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS 40.00 105482 OFFICE DEPOT 1165.72 105483 PACHECO OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT 9089.38 105484 PEARSON EDUCATION 4904.40 105485 PHYLLIS MCDONALD-RCMS 135.40 105486 POE TRAVEL 270.30 105487 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 425.43 105488 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE 21897.00 105489 QUALITY PETROLEUM INC 3160.21 Page T-15 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105490 RANDY SANDEFUR 95.98 105491 REGINALD MARTIN 70.00 105492 SAMMONS PRESTON ROLYAN 85.15 105493 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 423.38 105494 SCHOLASTIC MAGAZINES 181.49 105495 SEARCH SOFT SOLUTIONS INC 16100.00 105496 SHANON NEUMEIER 55.00 105497 SOUTHEAST AR EDUCATION SE 32934.00 105498 SPRINT 1769.23 105499 STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR EDU 1236.00 105500 STANLEY HARDWARE CO 10.80 105501 STUDENT SUPPLY 144.38 105502 T \u0026amp; T EQUIPMENT CO 190.75 105503 TEACH LINK TECHNOLOGIES 1598.00 105504 TEACHER DIRECT 90.71 105505 TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER 55.88 105506 TECH-KNOW INDUSTRIES 2737.25 105507 TELE TOUCH 51.24 ~ 105508 THE ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER 120.00 105509 THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PR 27.75 105510 THE TREE HOUSE INC 31. 39 105511 TOWNSEND PRESS BOOK CENTE 429.77 105512 u s FUEL 128.04 105513 US PIZZA CO 96.02 105514 US TOY COMPANY INC 68.43 105515 VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS 2087.64 105516 VIRCO MFG CORPORATION 1024.26 105518 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 2784.16 105519 WILKINS CONSTRUCTION INC. 189091.00 105520 WORD MASTERS 183.60 105521 XEROX CORPORATION 988.10 105522 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 45.00 105523 ACE GLASS COMPANY INC. 277.14 105524 ALL AMERICAN INC. 2034.67 Page T-16 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105525 ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTI 1163.50 105527 ARKANSAS COUNSELING ASSN 150.00 105528 ARKANSAS MAILING SERVICES 109.33 105529 ASCD 129.00 105530 ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY INC 288.99 105531 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 3678.35 105532 BANNER SIGN \u0026amp; BARRICADE I 290.25 105533 CITY YEAR INC 10000.00 105535 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO IN 1241.50 105536 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 27.51 105537 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT# 206.39 105538 COURTNEY JOHNSON 750.35 105539 COUSINS VIDEO 216.70 105540 DEBBIE DAVENPORT 200.00 105541 DEBORAH HORN 375.00 105542 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 1553.75 105543 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 75.00 105544 ERIC ARMIN INC 15.50 105545 ERIC D BROWN-ATHLETIC OFF 50.00 105546 FLOORCOVERINGS INTERNATIO 1112.04 105547 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 605.76 105548 HSU MUSIC WORKSHOP 15.00 105549 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 2120.50 105550 JAMES E GIVENS 70.00 105551 JAMES M FULKS 50.00 105552 JANET E THOMAS P.T. 898.35 105553 JANICE KUCALA-EAST CAMPUS 200.00 105554 JENNIFER WALKER 187.05 105555 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 1142.61 105556 LEARNING KEYS 3250.00 105557 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRI 610865.21 105558 MAISHA NICOLE JONES 20.00 105559 MARIBEL SIEMS 82.27 J.05560 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC EXTRE 76.68 Page T-17 North Little Rock School District Check listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105561 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITI 81.06 105562 PHYLLIS THOMPSON 20.00 105563 PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS 54.00 105564 SAX ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS 199.62 105565 SCHIFFLER EQUIPMENT SALES 166.70 105566 SCHOLASTIC MAGAZINES 155.87 105567 SIGN ZONE 811.88 105568 SOUTHEAST AR EDUCATION SE 150.00 105569 SOUTHWE~T SPORTING GOODS 2581.31 105570 STEPHEN WALLS 20.00 105571 SUNTRUST 22257.99 - 105573 SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; 14658.12 105574 T \u0026amp; T EQUIPMENT co 199.80 105575 THE SPORTSTOP INC 232.64 105576 THE UPS STORE 43.22 105577 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 1147.67 105578 US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT 2500.00 105579 US FUEL 169.57 105580 VIRCO MFG CORPORATION 2838.32 105581 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 28.37 105582 WEST MEMPHIS PAPER COMPAN 98.52 105583 WITTENBERG DELONG\u0026amp; DAVIDS 1773.51 105584 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 9469.24 105585 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 550.74 105586 BANK OF THE OZARKS 10596.54 105587 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 1108.16 105588 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 47.33 105589 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 149.52 105590 BANK OF THE OZARKS 304.48 105591 DEPT. OF .FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 65.18 105592 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 61.43 105593 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 32.81 105595 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 24381.61 105596 GRAINGER 690.70 Page T-18 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105597 KIDSOURCE THERAPPY 330.00 105598 LEE ANN DAVIS 675.00 105599 LYNN HARRISON 180.63 105601 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 4675.00 105602 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITI 254.43 105603 PLAYTIME CHILDRENS THERAP 1035.00 105604 SAM C GRANT JR 120.00 105605 THERAPY PROVIDERS PA 4138.75 105606 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 616.10 105607 ANDREA HAIN 54.02 105608 AR SPANISH INTERPRETER TR 208.25 105609 ASHLEY HANAN-BELWOOD 28.90 105610 BECKY AINLEY 116.10 105611 BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS 90.18 105612 BRAY SHEET METAL COMPANY 108.75 105613 CLARA REDDEN 52.54 105615 DEANN ROACH 29.07 105616 DEBBIE ROZZELL 62.65 105617 FARRELL-CALHOUN PAINT CO 379.45 105619 HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY 59.35 105620 HUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 61. 03 105621 JACK T CARTER COMPANY 1135.89 105622 JENNY OBANNON 63.98 105623 LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON co. 51. 63 105624 MICHELLE KEATON 25.84 105625 MID-SOUTH APPLIANCE PARTS 36. 2 9 105626 MIRANDA WALTERS 2.58 105627 NANCY SHEEHAN-SPECIAL SER 88.67 105628 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACH 1650.00 105629 NLR WELDING SUPPLY 250.40 105630 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHIN 49.95 105631 PERMA BOUND 1012.83 105632 REALLY GOOD STUFF INC 337.00 105633 RRCNA 220.00 Page T-19 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105 634 SCHOOL SPECIALTY 17.98 105635 SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS 129.55 105636 SPORTSCENE OF ARKANSAS 89.38 105637 STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR EDU 1545.00 105638 STEVE CANADY 53.58 105639 WEST MUSIC COMPANY 213.55 105640 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 3857.55 105641 BANK OF-THE OZARKS 4669.57 105642 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 252.36 105643 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 1.28 105644 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 132.00 105645 501 TIRE AND WHEEL 272.20 105646 ACCESS SCHOOLS 650.00 105648 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 1381.25 105649 AGATE 30.00 105650 ANTHONY CONNORS 30.00 105651 ARKANSAS BUSINESS PUBLISH 855.00 105652 ARMATUR EXCHANGE 725.22 105653 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 3905.20 105654 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY ACT 200.00 105655 BUDS N BOWS 40.33 105656 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 21.19 105657 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 493.01 105658 COCA-COLA USA 723.00 105659 COMCABLES 992.99 105660 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 745.15 105661 DINAH ALLEN 40.00 105662 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS I 452.50 105663 GLOVERS TRUCK PARTS \u0026amp; EQU 1398.60 105664 GRAINGER 133.17 105665 HUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 47.03 105666 JACQUES MUMFORD 30.00 , 105667 JAMIE EUBANKS 1015.00 105668 JIM'S CRANE RENTAL SERVIC 440.00 Page T-20 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105669 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 809.14 105670 LASER WORKS 941.00 105671 LETITIA MARTIN 42.05 105672 LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY 14.95 105673 LYNN HARRISON 63.63 105674 MATTHEW BINFORD 110.60 105675 MAVIS CHERRY 177.22 105676 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 905.70 105677 NAPA AUTO PARTS 513.19 105678 NATIONAL LIFT OF ARKANSAS 162.76 105679 NLR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12.00 105680 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 56.00 105681 NORTH LITTLE ROCK WINNELS 405.94 105682 OFFICE DEPOT 81.52 105683 PURVIS BEARING SERVICE 5.21 105684 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 85.50 105685 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 380.67 105686 REXEL DAVIES 60.26 105687 RHONDA BALDRIDGE 82.08 105688 RIVER CITY JANITORAL SUPP 16.34 105689 RIVERSIDE BOX SUPPLY CO 145.13 105690 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 159.97 105691 SANDERS SUPPLY 195.65 105692 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 80.35 105693 SHARON POOLE 454.98 105694 SHEILA BAKER 25.90 105695 SHERYLL SMITH 48.69 105696 THE ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER 120.00 105697 TOK SEMINARS 803.45 105698 TROUTMAN OIL CO INC 23102.30 105699 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 672.89 105700 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 18750.00 105701 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 325.00 105702 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 1440.00 Page T-21 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105703 BANK OF THE OZARKS 19394.81 105704 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 1001.22 105705 BANK OF THE OZARKS 55662.10 105706 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 5428.27 105707 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 2141.24 105708 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 92.41 105709 BANK OF THE OZARKS 2028.72 105710 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 110.59 105711 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 4.17 105712 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 24.90 105713 AARON BAILEY 60.00 105714 ALL AMERICAN INC. 2029.32 105715 ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORP 2923.69 105716 ALTA BOOK CENTER 159.00 105717 ANTHONY CANTRELL 20.00 105718 ANTHONY WEBB 70.00 105719 AR DEPT OF CORRECTION 1069.49 105720 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 3785.52 105721 ARCHEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS 551.25 105722 ARKANSAS EMPLOYMENT SECUR 24046.15 105723 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 3071.90 105724 BARNES AND NOBLE 971.08 105725 BENE KEITH 1327.32 105726 BLUE BELL CREAMERIES L.P. 784.75 105727 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 50.00 105728 BRAD BOLDING 135.88 105729 BRENDA HOLT 6.49 105730 BRIAN BOYD 30.00 105731 CARSON DELLOSA PUBLISHING 27.93 105732 CHARLA KAY BURKETT 3030.00 105733 CHERYL BING-WEST CAMPUS 138.39 105734 CITY OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK 3690.00 105735 CLARA LOFTON-PSMS 31.24 105736 CLARION INN OF FAYETTEVIL 123.79 Page T-22 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105737 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO IN 431.50 105738 CLASSROOM DIRECT 455.81 105739 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 113.08 105740 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 3739.44 105741 COMFORT INN OF MTN HOME 290.40 105742 CORNELIUS ROBERTS 90.00 105743 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 774.49 105744 DAMARIS PURTLE 258.48 105745 DANIEL J FLOYD 25.00 105746 DARLENE HOLMES 106.26 105747 DATEK, INC 210.46 105748 DIANNA LAMAR 71.72 105749 DIEDRA GASKALLA 462.10 105750 DR ANGELA OLSEN 23.00 105751 DWIGHT L RENDELL 70.00 105752 EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY 349.33 105753 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLIGIE 365.00 105754 EVAN-MOOR 373.78 105755 FCCLA LOCKBOX OPERATION 140.00 105756 FRED HOKES 70.00 105757 GARY L STEPHENS 62.50 105758 GERDAU AMERISTEEL 36.72 105759 GLORIA SMITH 462.10 105760 GOLDEN CORRAL 112.50 105761 GREENWOOD PUBLISHING GROU 204.23 105762 HERFF JONES INC 248.73 105763 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 1374.40 105764 JACK,NELSON,JONES,FINK,JI 2378.00 105765 JACKDAWS 165.80 105766 JILL JOLLY 203.89 105767 JOHN L STANDLEY 20.00 105768 JOYCE RODGERS 95.00 105769 JULIE MOBLEY 165.65 105770 JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD 300.00 Page T-23 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007 -2008 105771 KELLIE SHEFFIELD 30.00 105772 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 6493.26 105773 KEVIN DANAHER 146.20 105774 KOOLVENT ALUM. AWNING co. 993.60 105775 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY CO INC 1776.99 105776 KRISTIE RATLIFF 182.75 105777 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HIL 205.21 105778 LABOR LAW POSTERS USA INC 34.01 - 105779 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY ACTIV 331.97 105780 LEWIS \u0026amp; LEE DISTRIBUTING 2092.00 105781 LINDSEY'S BARBECUE 840.00 105782 LISA GRAY 20.00 105783 LORETTA HASSELL 152.34 105784 LRP PUBLICATIONS DEPT 107 3200.00 105785 LUCI A STEPHENS 62.50 105786 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM ACTIVITY 241.89 105787 LYNN HARRISON 201. 34 105788 LYONS MUSIC 143.64 105789 MARDEL CORPORATE OFFICE 737.72 105790 MARY CLAIRE WELCH 225.00 105791 MCINTIRE ENTERPRISES INC 98.90 105792 MCM 388.75 105793 MEMS 1085.00 105794 METRO FOODS 8125.18 105795 MUSIC IS ELEMENTARY 85.56 105796 N L R POSTMASTER BROADWAY 492.00 105797 NASASP 39.00 105798 NASCO 353.96 105799 NCS PEARSON 1645.38 105800 NLRSD TRANSPORATION DEPT 2439.75 105801 NLRSD WAREHOUSE .5572.00 105802 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVI 164.83 105803 OFFICE DEPOT 813.94 105804 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 243.43 Page T-24 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105805 OTIS RAY BANKS 20.00 105806 PAIGE BANGS 122.28 105807 PATSY A RHODES 50.00 105808 PAULA K URTON 30.00 105809 PERRY L PARR 20.00 105810 PFG LITTLE ROCK 8206.00 105811 PYRAMID INTERIORS 1290.23 105812 RANDALL H SANDEFUR 20.00 105813 REALLY GOOD STUFF INC 28.94 105814 REGINALD MARTIN 85.00 105815 RELLIA DILLINGER 462.10 105816 RICHARD ALEXANDER 408.00 105817 RICHARD WOODS 11. 61 105818 RRCNA 1060.00 105819 SAM C GRANT JR 90.00 105820 SAMMONS PRESTON ROLYAN 407.05 105821 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 511.91 105822 SARAH SHEPPARD 20.00 105823 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 239.10 105824 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 804.94 105825 SCHOLASTIC INC 278.94 105826 SCHOOL HEALTH CORPORATION 119.35 105827 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 111. 57 105828 SCOTT CROMER 370.69 105829 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 173.93 105830 STANDARD STATIONERY SUPPL 23.25 105831 SUMMIT LEARNING 63.30 105832 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARK 29179.02 105833 TANKERSLEY FOODSERVICE 10473.46 105834 TARGET BUSINESS CARD SERV 48.46 105835 TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER 307.95 105836 THE COLLEGE BOARD 325.00 105837 THE KIWANIS CLUB OF NO LI 120.00 105838 THOMAS E ANDERSON 20.00 Page T-25 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105839 THOMAS W OLLIE SR 20.00 105840 TRANSACT COMMUNICATIONS I 8841.00 105841 US TOY COMPANY INC 53.88 105842 VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS 685.55 105843 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 1696.04 105844 WENDY MILLER CONSULTING L 771.00 105845 WILLIE JONES 85.00 105846 AAEA 163.57 105847 ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS-PR 6268.39 105848 AEA 158.40 105849 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1457.00 105850 AFLAC 1916.00 105851 AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO 5456.50 105852 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 9225.00 105853 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 324652.66 105854 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 1053.90 105855 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 26539.59 105856 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 466.83 105857 BANK OF THE OZARKS 506296.54 105858 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 140.57 105859 C.T.A 5660.46 105860 CINTAS 19.13 105861 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 181.17 105862 CONSECO LIFE 66.36 105863 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 261.90 105864 DATAPATH ADMINISTRATIVE s 112.50 105865 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 3343.60 105866 DAVID W EDWARDS ATTORNEY 164.70 105867 DELTA DENTAL 26275.72 105868 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 91094.59 105869 DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SE 72.00 105870 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 182390.99 105871 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 381.21 105872 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 267.39 Page T-26 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105873 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEME 425.00 105874 ING - 457 575.00 105875 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 1585.00 105876 ING SERVICE CENTER 105.00 105877 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 105878 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 100.00 105879 JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY 50.35 105880 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2394.52 105881 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN PL 900.72 105882 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 4361.87 105883 MET LIFE 3001.17 105884 NC CHILD SUPPORT 137.00 105885 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 36198.17 105886 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 7.85 105887 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 6499.95 105888 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL 368.32 105889 OCSE 2440.92 105890 GREAT AMERICAN ADVISORS 3637.11 105891 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 90.08 105892 SBG-VAA 811. 00 105893 TASC 11150.43 105894 u s ABLE LIFE 1976. 73 105895 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 2041. 00 105896 u s ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 39.31 105897 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 6719.93 105898 u s DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 351.60 105899 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 522.26 105900 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 1621.85 105901 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 23516.47 105902 VALIC-VARIABLE ANNUITY LI 50.00 105903 APPERSON PRINT MANAGEMENT 213.00 105904 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY ACTIVI 167.27 105905 DATA MANAGEMENT 142.00 105907 NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITI 81483.74 Page T-27 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105908 RANDY SANDEFUR 200.00 105913 TURNER DAIRY 15101.24 105914 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 1699.52 105915 AEA 489.27 105916 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 197.50 105917 AFLAC 612.60 105918 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 300.00 105919 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 33209.71 105920 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 58.83 105921 AUDRIANNA GRISHAM ATTY 130.06 105922 BANK OF THE OZARKS 50174.32 105923 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 263.37 105924 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 105926 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 124.14 105927 CONSECO LIFE 5.29 105928 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 224.76 105929 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 105930 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 83.09 105931 DELTA DENTAL 3544.34 105932 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 7543.71 105933 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 33744.07 105934 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 537.50 105935 ING SERVICE CENTER 180.00 105936 JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE 175.38 105937 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 499.39 105938 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN, TRUS 373.00 105939 KEVMAR CAPITAL CORP 25.00 105940 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 3109.60 105941 MET LIFE 705.19 105942 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 5219.79 105943 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK  314.00 105944 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 1160.2? 105945 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL 3.25 105946 OCSE 1740.38 \\. Page T-28 North little Rock School District Check listing for Period 6 of Year 2007-2008 105947 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 286.39 105948 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1668.62 105949 ST VINCENT HEALTH SYSTEM 70.00 105950 TASC 208.16 105951 u s ABLE LIFE 170.85 105952 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 560.39 105953 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 1549.52 105954 u s DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 45.44 105955 u s DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE 96.34 105956 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 57.00 105957 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 27.90 105958 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 910.00 105959 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 991.38 105960 ACP DIRECT 335.40 105961 ALL AMERICAN INC. 1520.10 105962 ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTI 885.00 105963 ALLISON CALLAHAN 39.13 105964 BOX CARS AND ONE-EYED JAC 119.70 105965 CENTURY COMPUTER PRODUCTS 420.30 105966 CINTAS 90.07 105967 CORPORATE EXPRESS 493.33 105968 DEBBIE DAVENPORT 26. 40 105969 ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY 382.34 105970 GRAINGER 858.52 105971 MARK GRIFFIN 188.34 105972 RIGBY EDTJCATION 2405.21 105973 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 21.37 105974 SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS 866.80 105975 THE TREE HOUSE INC 1213.68 105976 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 500.00 105977 WILLIAM LEON DOREY-MAINTE 26.80 105978 DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX 1566.00 105979 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 2.17 105980 BANK OF THE OZARKS 59.52 Page T-29 North Little Rock School District Check Listingf or Period6 of Year 2007-2008 105981 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 4. 67 105982 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 1.16 105983 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 2498.00 106172 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME -76.00 106174 BANK OF THE OZARKS -76.50 106184 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI -4.07 517846 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 526.44 517847 BANK OF THE OZARKS 537.86 517848 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 46.09 517849 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 45.69 Total Checks Written Period 6 3,823,498.00 Page T-30 BOARD OF EDUCATION , MEETING AGENDA RECEIVED FEB\n~ d 2008 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO RING ass e North Little Rock School District Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:30 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, February 21, 2008 - 5:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Darrell Montgomery, President II. INVOCATION, Baron Kready, Lakewood Middle Eighth Grader, son of Liebe Kready III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Darrell Montgomery, President Scott Teague, Vice President Trent Cox, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Margo Tenner, Member Ron Treat, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Special Recognition - S. Brazear 1. Ashley Thomas, NLRHS West Campus Junior - Sparkle Award Winner 2. Sarah Barnes, Charity Cox, Sydney Dowlatshahi, Eddie Hale, Emily Smith - NLRHS High School Students named to All-State Bands 3. 4. Page 2 - Board Agenda February 21, 2008 Sherry Ratliff, NLRHS West Campus Teacher, appointed to the Arkansas Child Health Advisory Committee Lindsay Larkan, Carly Garner, and Haley Hamlin, NLRHS High School Student Editors of Vital Signs - received Excellence Recognition from National Council of Teachers of English Student Literary Magazine category and Natalie Darnell, Vital Signs advisor VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:30 P.M. (Regular)- Page A~ 1 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - S. Lasley B. Consider Secondary Social Studies Textbook Adoption Recommendation - R. Dickey - Page B - 1 C. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page R - 1 4. Consider building use request - Page S - 1 5. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T- 1 IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A. Proposed 2008 - 2009 School Calendar - G. Thompson -Page Z - 1 B. Special Services Update - S. Shurley X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Page 3 - Board Agenda February 21, 2008 A. Poplar Street Middle School's Mardi Gras-Fisher Annory- Friday, February 22, 2008- 5:00 P.M. B. North Little Rock PTA Founder's Day Banquet-Monday, February 25, 2008 - NLRHS East Campus Cafeteria- 6:30 P.M. C. NLRHS West Campus Uni-town's Dining for Diversity Banquet- Patrick H. Hays Center -March 8, 2008 - 6:00 P.M. D. NLRHS Public Perfonnances of\"West Side Story\"-Thursday, March 13, 2008, through Sunday, March 16, 2008-NLRHS East Campus Auditorium E. Regular Board Meeting-Thursday, March 20, 2008- 5:30 P.M. XI. STUDENT EXPULSION XII. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES January 17, 2008 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, January 17, 2008 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Darrell Montgomery called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Destiny Riddle, a Glenview Elementary Third Grader, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Darrell Montgomery, President Scott Teague, Vice President Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer Trent Cox, Secretary John Riley, Parliamentarian Margo Tenner, Member Ron Treat, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDr. Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculwn and Instruction\npress\nadditional staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS - TV (video) taped the meeting. AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA MOTION Trent Cox moved to add a new action item to new business to include a resolution concerning the Felder Alternative School. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None A-I RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, introduced the following for Special Recognition: 1. Fellowship North Bible Church was nominated by Pike View Elementary for their continued support of their school. Pike View Elementary was the beneficiary of their congregation's hard work in their school for Sharefest projects and many other needed areas. Ron Treat presented a plaque to Diane Heffington, Fellowship Bible Church representative, as new member of the Superintendent's Honor Roll. 2. Michael Huels, NLRHS East Campus Teacher, was also named as a new member of the Superintendent's_ Honor Roll in recognition of his work with NLRHS East Campus students in the Arkansas Stock Market Team. Trent Cox presented Mr. Huels with a plaque. 3. NLRHS East Campus Students: Karah Shelton, Ryan Tatum and Drew Edwards were recognized with Mr. Huels for their placement on the state level with the Arkansas Stock Market Game. Trent Cox and John Riley presented all with certificates. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the minutes of the December 18, 2007 (Regular) meeting as printed in the agenda. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Sandy Lasley, Certified Personnel Policies Committee Chair, presented their report and stated their committee has no proposals this month. Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report Glenda Tucker, Classified Personnel Policies Committee Chair, presented their report and stated their committee has no proposals this month. She stated the committee welcomed two new members: Lynne Underwood and Charles Utley. Mr. Utley was in attendance at the meeting and introduced. Secondary Social Studies Textbook Committee Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education, presented the committee as printed in the agenda for the selection of the social studies textbooks beginning in the 2008 - 2009 school year. A-2 MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the Secondary Social Studies Textbook Adoption Committee for the 2008 - 2009 school year social studies textbooks. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Career Action Planning (CAP) Book Mrs. Dickey presented the book for approval and explained there were few changes from the previous year. Mrs. Williams and Mr. Cox discussed some additions, revisions and reviews for the CAP book to assist in clarifying any misunderstandings. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the Career Action Planning Book as discussed to include the percentages on grades for '08 -'09, corrected requirements and typographical errors. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Felder Alternative Leaming Academy Resolution Proposal Mr. Acklin presented the proposal to approve our District in a continued partnership with the Little Rock School District for the 2008 - 2009 school year to place students as necessary in the Felder Alternative Learning Academy. His recommendation is for this agreement to be revised to one year and then our Administration would re-evaluate since the Pulaski County Special School District is no longer participating in this partnership. MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the following resolution. Ron Treat seconded the motion. \"Whereas, on this 17'11 day of January, 2008, the North Little Rock School District Board of Directors hereby agrees to the continued involvement of the North Little Rock School District with the Felder Alternative Learning Academy for the 2008 - 2009 school year. The North Little Rock School District will continue our partnership with the Little Rock School District in the conversion charter school designed t~ serve the needs of our alternative environment students.\" YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel recommended the Board accept the information on pages O - I through T - 30 as printed in the agenda. A-3 MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the consent agenda as printed. Scott Teague seconded - the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA MOTION Trent Cox moved to add a new action item to the agenda to include setting a definite date for the Board Workshop. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None The Board decided the best date is Saturday, February 16, 2008 beginning at 9 a.m. at the J.W. Nutt Company on Crestwood in North Little Rock. MOTION Trent Cox moved to have a Board Workshop on Saturday, February 16, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. at the J.W. Nutt Co. Margo Tenner seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Mrs. Williams requested our Personnel office provide teachers whose licenses are up for renewal this year are given hard copies of the Arkansas Department of Education's renewal procedures. Mr. Thompson stated he would provide this information via hard copies. Mr. Teague explained he attended a Watch Dog Dad meeting at Indian Hills Elementary and explained the meeting was to include all male role models of every student at Indian Hills Elementary for their involvement in the school. He complimented Sheryll Smith, Indian Hills Elementary Principal and Matthew Binford, Indian Hills Elementary Assistant Principal, for their work to include the male influences in our students. STUDENT EXPULSION Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation, presented the Board with a recommendation for expulsion. Mr. Acklin recommended Jerrell Reynolds, a NLRHS East Campus School Tenth grader, be expelled for the current semester and the following semester for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor guardian/parent attended the meeting. A-4 MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the Administration's recommendation for the expulsion of Jerrell Reynolds for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None SUPERINTENDENT'S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW MOTION Trent Cox moved for the Board to enter into an Executive Session for the Superintendent's Review. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None The Board entered into a closed session with the Superintendent at 6:20 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 7:55 p.m. MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to add an additional year to Mr. Kirspel's contract extending to the end of the year 2011. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None Ron Treat moved to increase Mr. Kirspel's salary by 2 % (two per cent) for the 2007 - 2008 school year. Dorothy Wiliiams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None ADJOURNMENT MOTION Margo Tenner moved to adjourn the meeting. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner, Treat and Williams None President Montgomery declared the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Darrell Montgomery, President Trent Cox, Secretary A-5 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT February 13, 2008 TO: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent FROM: Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education SUBJECT: Recommendation for 7-12 Social Studies Textbook Adoption The 7-12 Secondary Social Studies Textbook Adoption Committee recommends the following textbooks for use beginning in the 2008-2009 school year. Subject : History Grade: 7 Title: History of Our World ( Orange) Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject : History Grade: 8 Title: History of Our World (Green) Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject : Arkansas History Title: The Arkansas Journey Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Flag and Banner Subject : Civics Title: Civics: Responsibilities and Citizenship Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Grade: 7 Grade: 9 Subject : Pre-AP Civics Grade: 9 Title: Magruder's American Government Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject: World Geography* Title: World Geography Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Grade: 9 Subject: World History Grade: 10 Title: World History: Connections to Today Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject: AP World History Title: The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History, Bullit Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Houghton Mifflin * Semester-long social studies elective. B-1 Grade: 10 Subject : American History Grade: 11 Title: America: Pathways to the Present Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject : AP United States History Title: The Enduring Vision Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Houghton Mifflin Subject: ID History I {History of the Americas) Title: The Enduring Vision  Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Houghton Mifflin Grade: 11 Grade: 11 Subject: ID History II {20th Century World History) Grade: 12 Title: Civilization in the West Since 1300, Kishlansky Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject : Psychology Grade: 11-12 Title: Principles and Practices Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Hole, Rinehart and Winston Subject : AP Psychology Grade: 11-12 Title: Psychology, f31hE dition Myers Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Worth Publishing Subject : ID Psychology Title: Psychology, f31hE dition Myers Grade: 11-12 Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Worth Publishing Subject : ID Psychology {HL) Title: Psychology,5 th Edition Gray Grade: 12 Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Worth Publishing Subject: Civics/American Government* and American Government* Grade: 11-12 Title: Magruder's American Government Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Inc. Subject : Sociology * Grade: 11-12 Title: The Study of Human Relationships Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Holt, Rinehart \u0026amp; Winston Subject : Contemporary American History* Grade: 11-12 Title: American Anthem, Ayers Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston Subject : Economics* Grade: 11-12 Title: Economics: Principles and Practices Textbook Company/Publisher Name: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill * Semester-long social studies elective. B-2 I ., cal Revenue Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Rentals Contributions/Donations Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue From Intermediate Source I Severance Tax I Other Revenue from County Tota I From Intermediate Revenue From State Sources Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding Additional Base Funding Other Unrestricted Grants-in-Aid I from State Sources -Tola - Revenue from State Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Tola I State Restricted 0th er Sources-Nonrevenue Tola Tota Insurance Reimbursement Sale of Equipment I Other Sources I Revenue Operations Buil ding Fund Capital Outlay Fund Federal Fund Child Nutrition Fund TOTAL REVENUE North Little Rock School District Accounting Period 7 - January 2008 2007-2008 %of Current Month Budget Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Balance $12,750,000.00 $0.00 $11,720,801.72 $1,029,198.28 91.93% $6,500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,500,000.00 0.00% $1,645,000.00 $117,335.00 $848,871.65 $796,128.35 51.60% $310,000.00 $0.00 $2,205.38 $307,794.62 0.71% $220,000.00 $1,137,577.46 $1,219,658.17 -$999,658.17 554.39% $190,000.00 $93,497.61 $198,906.69 -$8,906.69 104.69% $112,000.00 $5,805.24 $17,896.46 $94,103.54 15.98% $1,000,000.00 $236,586.80 $489,219.57 $510,780.43 48.92% $79,000.00 $3,387.45 $25,348.80 $53,651.20 32.09% $16,500.00 $3,450.00 $19,930.96 -$3,430.96 120.79% $27,560.00 $1,707.50 $9,467.00 $18,093.00 34.35% $61,600.00 $2,803.04 $106,025.09 -$44,425.09 172.12% $22,911,660.00 $1,602,150.10 $14,658,331.49 $8,253,328.51 63.98% $7,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,600.00 0.00% $2,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,600.00 0.00% $10,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,200.00 0.00% $35,682,179.00 $3,243,834.00 $19,463,004.00 $16,219,175.00 54.55% $0.00 $638,726.00 $638,726.00 -$638,726.00 $450,000.00 $41,079.00 $246,474.00 $203,526.00 54.77% $2,000.00 $0.00 $1,750.00 $250.00 87.50% $36,134,179.00 $3,923,639.00 $20,349,954.00 $15,784,225.00 56.32% $550,000.00 $0.00 $475,960.49 $74,039.51 86.54% $4,843,680.00 $774,347.00 $2,866,220.00 $1,977,460.00 59.17% $2,757,440.00 $229,648.00 $1,764,637.06 $992,802.94 64.00% $7,120,000.00 $346,750.09 $3,670,256.85 $3,449,743.15 51.55% $431,870.00 $201,880.46 $473,591.47 -$41, 721.47 109.66% $15,702,990.00 $1,552,625.55 $9,250,665.87 $6,452,324.13 58.91% $110,000.00 $489.97 $24,003.31 $85,996.69 21.82% $9,000.00 $0.00 $998.00 $8,002.00 11.09% $119,000.00 $4C9.97 $25,001.31 $93,998.69 21.01% $74,878,029.00 $7,078,904.62 $44,283,952.67 $30,594,076.33 59.14% $2,034,000.00 $956,829.02 $2,104,801.06 -$70,801.06 103.48% $1,sso,000.001 $100,906.291 $1,057,389.251 $492,610.751 68.22%1 $6,1s8.011.001 $1,354,956.641 $1,809,652.631 $4,948,424.371 26.78%1 $4,oso,ooo.ool $324,780.87 I $1,889,315.71 I $2,160,684.291 46.65%1 I $89,210,106.001 $9,816,377.441 $51,145,111.321 $38,124,994.681 57.29%1 0-1 Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOT AL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof IT ech Services Purchased Property Services Other Purchased Services Supplies and Materials Property Other Objects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND BUILDING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FEDERAL FUND CHILD NUTRITION FUND TOT AL EXPENDITURES North Little Rock School District Accounting Period 7 - January 2008 2007-2008 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $38,893,280.00 $3,445,727.17 $19,370,914.04 $10,240,008.00 $926,274.02 $5,131,461.33 $10,077,195.00 $927,181.08 $6,202,316.31 $3,359,720.00 $304,451.80 $2,014,302.05 $62,570,203.00 $5,603,634.07 $32,718,993.73 $1,248,946.00 $56,828.62 $536,208.79 $968,420.00 $73,415.69 $555,326.39 $1,881,482.00 $83,660.33 $2,368,358.78 $4,958,847.00 $381,837.81 $3,181,178.78 $184,050.00 $0.00 $29,291.65 $111,859.00 $4,854.00 $74,635.71 $2,745,265.00 $22,257.99 $1,903,192.12 $12,098,869.00 $622,854.44 $8,648,192.22 $74,669,072.00 $6,226,488.51 $41,367,185.95 $8,650,490.00 $346,743.68 $3,060,490.26 $1,791,824.00 $231,591.14 $1,066,096.59 $4,294,620.09 $596,805.85 $3,443,587.80 $4,028,186.48 $320,912.43 $2,512,939.76 $93,434,192.57 $7,722,541.61 $51,450,300.36 0-2 % of Budget Budget Balance Balance $19,522,365.96 49.81% $5,108,546.67 50.11% $3,874,878.69 61.55% $1,345,417.95 59.95% $29,851,209.27 52.29% $712,737.21 42.93% $413,093.61 57.34% -$486,876.78 125.88% $1,777,668.22 64.15% $154,758.35 15.92% $37,223.29 66.72% $842,072.88 69.33% $3,450,676.78 71.48% $33,301,886.05 55.40% $5,589,999.74 35.38% $725,727.41 59.50% $851,032.29 80.18% $1,515,246.72 62.38% $41,983,892.21 55.07% NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Board Agenda -February 21, 2008 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND TERMINATIONS Charlotte Virden Boone Park Elementary- Gifted and Talented Teacher Effective 01/22/08 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION NAME: Kelly Cochrane PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Elementary Counselor - Lynch Drive Elementary EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Effective 01/23/08, Category IV, Step 11, 191 days Master's Degree- University of Missouri- St. Louis, MO, 09/1992 Reciprocity Pending, PE/Wellness/Leisure P-12, ALP Elem. Counseling Rogers Middle School, St. Louis, MO, 08/1987 -12/1995 Graves Junior High, Summit, IL, 8/1983 - 06/1987 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Megan Wilson Pre-K Teacher, Redwood Early Childhood Center Effective 01/03/08, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - UALR, 12/2007 Early Childhood P-4, One-Year Provisional Watson Elementary, 1/2006 -05/2006 Jody Edrington, Coordinator, Early Childhood Programs Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Jennifer Zink Second Grade Teacher, Seventh Street Elementary Effective O 1 /17 /08, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - UALR, 12/2007 Early Childhood P-4, Initial 3 year Seventh Street Elementary, 8/2007 - 12/2007 Pam Wilcox, Principal, Seventh Street Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-1 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND TERMINATIONS Jerri Braddix North Heights Elementary - Lunch Period Aide/Morning Aide Effective 2-15-08 Damonica Brown Amboy Elementary - Lunch Period Aide Effective 1-09-08 Chandra Carter Transportation Department - Bus Driver Effective 1-21-08 Linda Kay Clark Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 1-15-08 Erma Gill Glenview Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 11-16-07 Alexis Sharmelle Lee ---- Boone Park Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 1-22-08 Romonda Young Boone Park Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 1-03-08 NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Irene Brown Lynch Drive Elementary - Special Education Paraprofessional Effective 1-28-08, Schedule 8PP, Range 1-01, 185 days Andrea Bryant Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-09-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days Margaret Hendricks ---- Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-07-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days Alexis Lee Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-07-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days Maria Ocampo Lakewood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-30-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days O'Tear Scott Boone Park Elementary -Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-28-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days Penelope Stewart Transportation Department - Bus Driver Effective 1-17-08, Schedule 8TR, Range I-01, 190 days Sharon Young Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-30-08, Schedule 8CN, Range 1-01, 181 days P-2 NORTHL ITTLER OCKS CHOODL ISTRICT February2 008B IDSF ORA PPROVAL BIDN UMBER0: 8-01-122 BID NAME: School Bus Bid - (2) 48 passenger SOURCEO FF UNDINGT:r ansportation LOCATIONT:r ansportation DiamondS tate CentraSl tates $ 150,420.00 $ 149,230.00- BIDN UMBER0: 8-01-122 BIDN AMES: choolB us Bid - (4) TTp assenger SOURCEO FF UNDINGT:r ansportation LOCATIONT:r ansportation DiamonSd tate CentraSl tates BIDN UMBER0: 8-02-022 $ 306,760.00- $ 323,500.00 BIDN AMEL: amp/Ballast/Recyclin-(g2 00) T-Sb,( 50)T -5b,( 500)T S,( 100)F 34 (100)T 12,( 100)T 5,( 100)2 0W,( 100)2 9W,( 100)4 2W,( 20)b r, (10)b r SOURCEO F FUNDINGP: lantS ervices LOCATIONW: arehouse CED Treadway BIDN UMBER0: 8-02-084 $15,100.40 $12269.10- BIDN AMEP: arkH ill OrnamentaFl encea ndG ates SOURCEO FF UNDINGC: apitalO utlay LOCATIONP:a rkH ill ElementaryS chool UnitedF ence\u0026amp; Construction Didn otm eets pecifications Part of all or no bid ... Qualityn otr ecommended - LimneCd overage Reoornmended $7,7 26.32.. ... R-1 CITY YEAR LITTLE ROCK/NORTH LITTLE ROCK P,Utting idealism to work 610 President Clinton Avenue, Suite 300 Little Rock, AR 72201 www.cltyyear.org PHONE 501. 707.1400 FAX 501. 707.1428 January 28, 2008 Barry Kind 2700 Poplar St.. North Little Rock. AR 72114 ID)~t~~~~ijl ln1JA[N3 0 2008 ll!Jl Dear Mr. Kind, FINANCE/PURCHASING/AUDIT I am writing to respectfully request to use the facilities of Ridgeroad Mi e c oo y 1ty ear 1tt e oc o Little Rock's Young Heroes Program. City Year, a branch of AmeriCorps, is a non-profit organization that engages a diverse group of 17-24 year olds to a demanding year of full time community service. One of the services that City Year provides is a Saturday community service and service learning program for middle school students called Young Heroes. This year, City Year is engaging over 70 youth to commit to serving a minimum of 80 hours each. Many of our students come from the North Little Rock School District, representing all 4 North Little Rock middle schools, The Young Heroes will meet an average of 3 Saturdays a month from January through May. Each Saturday will be held at a different location in order to help our Young Heroes bridge the social barrier between both the Little Rock and North Little Rock communities. In order to be able to meet this goal, we are humbly requesting the use of Ridgeroad Middle School (8am-Spm) on:  Saturday, February.23rd , 2008 .  : Saturd~y. March. 15'\\ 2008 ,_ ..   Saturday, May IO\"', 2008 Due to the nature of the different activities we use to teach our students about different social justice issues we will require access to the following:  the gymnasium for large group activities  4-5 classrooms for smaller group discussion and reflection  bathroom facilities An additional and very important benefit from this partnership is the recognition of our program by North Little Rock School District students. Our program has grown from 25 students in 2006 to over 70 students this year. As Young Heroes continues to grow, we strive to engage more and more North Little Rock students in the commitment to service and hope that Young Heroes becomes a household term with the middle schools students and guardians. With the help and use of facilities of NLRSD, we are confident that the message of service and Young Heroes will continue to grow within the North Little Rock community. Should additional information be requested, please feel free to contact me using the information below. I am excited at this opportunity to work hand-in-hand with the North Little Rock School District. I look forward to speaking with you on February 22nd , for a final confirmation of this request. S2P--rienlcy , 6 / ,.. 77-.:.' ,  i   . Andr.ea Gomez '.',.  , . Young Heroes Seniqr Corps, Member City Year Little Rock/North ~ittle Rock Agomez07@cityyear.org 501.707.1407 (office) S-1 GA ., . . NATIONALL EADERSHIPS PONSORS BankofAmerica' I I 1 1 I 1 ' @ CSX - - =nw7 - '11-L....L.-:.l - m M bil . ~- CISCO. Comcast ~ ~ ...,. IWWt:lliUIU ._, \"J.\"   0 e ~ Foundation - PEPSI. Boston . Chicago  Cleveland  Columbia  Columbus  Detroit , Little Rock/North Little Rock . Los Angeles  Lou1s1ana New Hampshire New York  GrP.Aff:HP hilflrlP.lnh1:=1 R hnrlP. l~IAnrl  S\n:in Antnn1n  ~~n lnc::P/~1hrrm \\fall.:,\\/  ~\u0026amp;:i~ttlQ/K'1nn r'f\"'ll 1nh, . Q.ru 1th afn,-.~  \\l\\bch1nr,tnn nr Page 1 ofl. Barry Kincl - Re: renting of facility@Ridge Rd .. middle school From: teny e cotleur To: Date: 2/4/2008 3:39 PM SUbject: Re: renting of facility@Ridge Rd. middle school North Little Rock Spanish Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses Terry Cotleur Representative 8212 Orchard Drive Little Rock, AR 72209 Cell. 501-952-0664 Fax/Voice 501-228-5277 Dear Mr. Kind, 230 Smokey Ln. N.L.R AR 72117 I am at this time, per my conversation with Ms Tucker, requesting the use of the facility at the Ridge Road Middle school or jr. High campus for the following date: Saturday-March 22, 2008 at 6:30p.m.until 9:30 p.m. This is a special event that is held once a year. We are in need for seating only to accommodate 100 to 125 people and the use of a microphone and podium. This can be a cafeteria or another room. I had called the principal at this school and she informed me that at this time there is nothing scheduled, however I would need to contact you. At this time, I am also requesting an approval, if at all possible , before the school board meets as we also need to send any contracts/paperwork to be approved. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Terry Cotleur Representative S-2 file://C:\\Documents and Settings\\teacher\\Local Settings\\Temp\\XPgrpwise\\47A731A6NLR_ ... 2/4/2008 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 _~,:.~ \\' ~~ t- ~' -,-,-..-J~ 105984 ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY 63.15 105985 ALAN CROWNOVER - MAINTENA 246.43 105986 ALICIA YARBROUGH 74.33 105987 ALISHA HERRING 153.67 105988 AMY VOLLMAN 73.19 105989 ANDRIA SMITH 87.42 105990 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 183.25 105991 ARKANSAS BAG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENT 12,514.08 105992 BASICS PLUS 8,403.74 105993 BECKY WITCHER 330.24 105994 BILL DUVALL - TECHNOLOGY 42.23 105995 BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE 113. 40 105996 BOBBY ACKLIN 134. 89 105997 BOBBY TRAFFANSTEDT 25.28 105998 BRANDY NESSELRODT 101.87 105999 BROOKE BRICKER-EARLY CHIL 97.01 106000 CAROLINE PRESTRIDGE 497.00 106001 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 224.24 106002 CHARLOTTE DEROCHIE 30.23 106003 CHERYL HALL-SPECIAL SERVI 56.80 106004 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 7.06 106005 CORPORATE EXPRESS 121.33 106006 COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL C 213.47 106007 DANA MCCOY 100.84 106008 DANA MORGAN 99. 75 106009 DAVIS ACOUSTICS 4,985.00 106010 DAWNE CARROLL 27.56 106011 DEANN ROACH 20.21 106012 DEBBIE DAVENPORT 22.49 106013 DIEDRA GASKALLA 113. 30 -- -- 106014 DREW CAMP-SPECIAL SERVICE 45.55 -- 106015 GLADYS SWIFT-LWMS 359.25 106016 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NLR 6,000.00 106017 J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY 3,194.94 106018 JACQUELINE SUMLER 53.06 106019 JAMES W WOODARD 29.54 106020 JANET FOSTER 165.26 106021 JANEVA WHITE-WEST CAMPUS 188. 78 106022 JERRY MASSEY 191.62 Page T- 1 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 J.,:,.\u0026gt;\u0026lt;.-)'\n\"1,.11, -~i'l.~,,- '\"' ,~  ,:.,:_- ~ ~a.. .,. .,,\\,_ . Y.,\ni,'C, ~e:~~: ..  . ~  . ~,_,\n, . ~-~  .   ':N\"\n106023 JIMMY MAHER-COMPUTER SERV 107.58 106024 JULIE ASHER 3.27 106025 JULIE SOBKOVIAK 84.37 106026 KAREN POWELL 81. 61 106027 KARLA WHISNANT 160.42 106028 KATE ECK 64.16 106029 KAYE LOWE - CENTRAL OFFIC 17.50 106030 KEVIN MARTIN 95.67 106031 KIM ISGRIG-LAKEWOOD MIDDL 18.25 106032 KIM PEARSON 486.63 106033 KNOWBUDDYR ESOURCES 1,022.20 106034 KRISTEN MADDOX 51. 60 106035 KRISTIE RATLIFF 761.00 106036 KRISTIE RATLIFF 19.59 106037 LAURA JENNINGS FOOD SERVI 64.72 106038 LAURA WINTERS 60.50 106039 LAUREN WALKER 57.53 106040 LEANN NANNEN 131.80 106041 LEARNING LINKS 503.30 106042 LORETTA WILSON 169.68 106043 LORI HARMS 544.72 106044 MARJORIE MCAFEE 146.26 106045 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 154.93 106046 MATHC OUNTS 160.00 106047 MEREDITH WILLIAMS 204.64 106048 NANCY SHEEHAN-SPECIAL SER 72. 50 106049 NANCY STEWART 119. 63 106050 NAPA 1,442.96 106051 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOLS 12,423.95 106052 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 29.87 106053 OFFICE DEPOT 135.14 106054 REBECCA WINTERS 106.90 106055 RELLIA DILLINGER 33.45 106056 RITA LOVENSTEIN 21. 50 106057 ROCHELLE REDUS , 44. 70 106058 ROGER E GIBSON-WEST CAMPU 897.00 106059 SAM MASCUILLI 23.39 106060 SARAH CHILDERS 97.44 106061 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC 104.65 Page T- 2 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 -- 106062 SEAN J FLEMING-WEST CAMPO 497.00 106063 SHANNAH CUMMINGS 848.36 106064 SHARON ELDRED 71. 51 106065 SUSAN M HYDEN 82.99 106066 TERRI FRENCH 77.53 106067 THE OUTSIDER POWER CLEANI 900.00 106068 TINA SOUTH 450.26 106069 TREND ENTERPRISES INC CM 37.90 106070 US TOY COMPANY INC 139. 02 106071 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 5,032.07 106072 VIDEO REALITY 1,239.00 106073 VIRGINA WALLACE 37.84 106074 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 52.69 106075 A-ONE LAMINATION INC 382.25 106076 ACE GLASS COMPANY INC. 209. 79 106077 AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY 1,612.51 106079 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #85 6,943.10 106080 ANTHONY CONNORS 85.00 106081 ARKANSAS ACTE 110.00 106082 ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS AS 1,681.00 106083 ASCD 369.00 106084 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 1,801.15 106085 ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISI 25.95 106086 BANK \u0026amp; BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 112. 77 106087 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 30.00 106088 ~-- BOILER INSPECTION DIVISIO 68.00 -- 106090 CAROLINE FAULKNER 9.31 106091 CAROLYN CLOUD 1,372.27 f--- 106092 CINDY LANN 482.20 \u0026gt;--- 106093 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO IN 54.00 106094 CLASSROOM DIRECT 30. 89 106095 CLAUDIA MORAN 48.89 f------ - 106096 COMCAST CALBLEVISION 100.06 106097 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 1,023.42 106098 CYNTHIA RUSSENBERGER 215.00 - - - 106099 DOROTHY FARRIS 47 .13 -- 106100 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 600.00 -- 106101 ERIC ARMIN INC 35,981.25 - -- 106102 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 2,343.95 Page T- 3 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ~)t~~~ ir=\"\"' ,---.\n._\nii,i,.\n,,,/\n. ., .. \".:) Ji~l, ~~- \"' ,..J c\"-,hJ}: ?.c A- mt 106103 FREY SCIENTIFIC CO 60.00 106104 GAIL HAYDEN 457.50 106105 GARY L STEPHENS 37.50 106106 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 142.52 106107 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 236.23 106108 J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY 2,870.64 106109 JAMES T CHRISTOPHER 85.00 - 106110 JAMIE EUBANKS 1,050.00 106111 JENNIFER AMOX 49.62 106112 JIM CARTER 588.68 106113 JUPITERIMAGES 205.90 106114 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING co 1,173.66 106115 KENNETH A KIRSPEL 500.00 106116 KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO 63.53 106117 KIDS DIRECTORY LLC 550.00 106118 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 93.85 106119 LARA HUMPHRIES 2,310.00 106120 LEARNING BRAIN EXPO 360.00 106121 LEE TACKETT 135.49 106122 LEES SCHOOL OF COSMETOLOG 13,000.00 106123 LENISHA BROADWAY-RRMS 1,282.80 106124 LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON co. 2,993.54 106125 LOWE'S 192.95 106126 LUCI A STEPHENS 37.50 106127 MARTHA NORTON 3,010.00 106128 MARVIN LOVE 60.00 106129 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 435.00 106130 MOBILE MINI LLC AK 147.02 106131 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 7.14 106132 NAPA AUTO PARTS 115. 04 106133 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 175.00 106134 OFFICE DEPOT 74.49 106135 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 12.90 106136 POE TRAVEL 720.80 106137 RAYMOND SMITH 105.09 106138 REBECCA R CARR 1,571.86 106139 REFLECTIONS 430.28 106140 RICE UNIVERSTIY 525.00 106141 RICKEY JONES 13. 86 Page T-4 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 106142 ROSE CITY MIDDLE ACTIVITY 557.64 106143 ROYAL BUSINESS MACHINES 72.56 106144 RUSSELL CHEVROLET co 10.20 106145 SAMANTHA CURRAN 31. 30 106146 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 488.83 106147 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC 270.70 106148 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 199.57 106149 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 304.41 106150 SHORTER COLLEGE 701. 89 106151 SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT 49.99 106152 STACY DUNCAN 55.00 106153 STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR EDU 597.00 106154 STANLEY HARDWARE co 184.91 106155 TELE TOUCH 51. 24 106156 THE TIMES 22.00 106157 THOMAS E ANDERSON 30.00 106158 THREE STATES SUPPLY CO IN 474.08 106159 TRANE PARTS CENTER OF ARK 296.26 106160 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 56.20 106161 TROUTMAN OIL CO INC 2,594.25 106162 US FUEL 141. 10 106163 UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERV 844.00 106164 VICTORY CHEERLEADING 252.85 106165 VIRCO MFG CORPORATION 4,523.15 106166 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 370.38 106167 WEST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 127.48 106168 AEA 489.27 106169 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 197.50 106170 AFLAC 632.00 106171 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 300.00 106172 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 21,962.55 106173 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 27.55 106174 BANK OF THE OZARKS 35,303.59 106175 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 285.85 -- 106176 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 106177 CINTAS 90.07 106178 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 114.26 106179 CONSECO LIFE 10.58 - 106180 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 162. 43 Page T- 5 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ~~?l{ta1 ~-\n,\n--.,~:~ -'iii\". , '' -  ., . -~,.\n:'\"'.9,.@1~.i t I. .4_\n. - . ..!'- . ~ ., .,. ... ~{~ '\" -.. ...,.~7' 106181 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 106182 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 83.09 106183 DELTA DENTAL 3,647.44 106184 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 4,759.72 106185 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 34,418.38 106186 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 537.50 106187 ING SERVICE CENTER 180.00 106188 JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE 175.38 106189 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 183.24 106190 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN, TRUS 373.00 106191 KANSAS PAYMENT CENTER SG0 46.15 106192 KEVMAR CAPITAL CORP 25.00 106193 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 841.17 106194 MET LIFE 739.99 106195 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 4,799.74 106196 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 83.46 106197 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 1,186.87 106198 OCSE 1,599.33 106199 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 177.30 106200 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1,286.70 106201 ST VINCENT HEALTH SYSTEM 20.00 10 62 02 TASC 208.16 106203 u s ABLE LIFE 175.10 106204 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 578.13 106205 u s ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 4.93 106206 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 1,575.37 106207 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 57.00 106208 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 27.90 106209 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 910.00 106210 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 45.00 106211 AH-HA 275.00 106212 ALARMTC SYSTEMS 164.00 106213 ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTI 929.50 106214 AMERICA'S CHOICE 4,455.00 106215 ANNAN VAMMEN 71. 33 106216 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 399.75 106217 ARCOM SYSTEMS 309.75 106218 ARKANSAS BUSINESS PUBLISH 2,205.00 106219 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE 259.24 Page T- 6 North Little Rock School District Check ListingF or Period0 7 of Year 2007-2008 -- - - :,.., .-,,_\n:).-~c.:.,\n...\n... ~ -~, ..__ ,:..,L-. ' ,., \" , 106220 ASHA/AMERICAN SPCH-LANG,H 756.00 106221 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 1,764.10 106222 BLICK ART MATERIALS 64.13 106223 BOILER INSPECTION DIVISIO 25.00 106224 BOOK LINKS 29.95 106225 BRENDA BUTLER 49.02 106226 BRENDA MELVIN 265.00 106227 CABOT FLORISTS 223.31 106228 CARSON DELLOSA PUBLISHING 26.94 106229 CINDY BECKETT 69.46 106230 COMPASS LEARNING INC 75,373.90 106231 CROW BURLINGAME CO 532.67 106232 D\u0026amp; H DISTRIBUTING 1,660.97 106233 DEBORAH HORN 2,625.00 106234 ED'S SUPPLY CO 108.38 106235 FERRELLGAS 47.00 106236 GOODMAN DISTRIBUTION INC 136.41 106237 GRAINGER 116.86 106238 GWEN HAMMONDS 897.00 106239 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 1,766.84 106240 HUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 24.45 106241 J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY 122.99 106242 J S PRINTING 316.00 106243 KEELING COMPANY 34.85 106244 LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON co. 314.68 106245 MARIA TOUCHSTONE 967.00 106246 MARIA TOUCHSTONE 136.57 106247 MOBILE MINI LLC AK 164.23 106248 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 166.57 106249 NAEIR 139.00 -\u0026gt;- 106250 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVI 63.01 106251 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 655.93 10 62 52 NORTH LITTLE ROCK WINNELS 525.59 106253 OFFICE DEPOT 59.39 106254 OPTIONS PUBLISHING INC 6,259.55 106255 POSTMASTER, SHERWOOD 172. 00 106256 RAINEY ELECTRONICS 28.90 106257 REXEL DAVIES 229.12 - 106258 RRCNA 530.00 Page T- 7 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ~~G'\". ,., u  .~ C' !''?~.~,].,,_'.,'.,\"1,i_t\"~{I:~ =,ic,,~.s_, 7-\"\"\"i:~~.:1\n.:-c~~'- ~c~q ~.-~. . t.r. .. 106259 SANDERS SUPPLY 110 .11 106260 SCHOOL SPECIALTY 514.37 106261 SHRED-IT 97.50 106262 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 2,215.56 106263 SMITH DISTRIBUTING 329.61 106264 SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT 496.79 106265 STANLEY HARDWARE co 31. 96 106266 STEVE CANADY 28.55 106267 SUNTRUST 22,257.99 106268 TARGET STORE #162-MCCAIN 189.98 10 6269 THE OUTSIDER POWER CLEANI 125.00 106270 TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY 20.50 106271 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 431.63 10 6272 TRI-STATES VIDEO 43.00 106273 US POSTAL SERVICE(HASLER 2,500.00 106274 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 348.29 106275 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 562.01 106276 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 2,819.45 106277 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 230 .13 106278 BANK OF THE OZARKS 3,133.43 106279 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 193.66 106280 ADRIENNE BUSH 30.00 106281 ALFONZO JAKES 135. 00 106282 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #85 66.53 106283 AMERICA'S CHOICE 2,880.00 106284 ANTHONY CANTRELL 30.00 106285 ANTHONY CONNORS 30.00 106286 ANTHONY SMITH 80.00 106287 ARK STATE BOARD OF PHYSIC 75.00 106288 ARMATUR EXCHANGE 133.92 106289 ARMEA 85.00 106290 AT\u0026amp;T 86.81 1062 91 BLUE BELL CREAMERIES L.P. 203.18 1062 92 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 60.00 106293 BRAD BOLDING 30.00 106294 CABLES N MOR 30.63 106295 CANDICE LAWLESS 12.50 106296 CHERYL BING 12.50 106297 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 25. 4 6 Page T- 8 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008   u, ,  ,,.       -..-,cc\u0026gt;\u0026lt;.~ 106298 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 782. 59 106299 DAMONICA D BROWN 30.00 106300 DANIEL J FLOYD 25.00 106301 DERRICK GREENWOOD 85.00 106302 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 300.00 106303 ERNIE MURRY 80.00 106304 FLYNCO INC. 231,963.51 106305 GARY L STEPHENS 75.00 106306 IMAGEMARKET 208.95 106307 IMPACT EDUCATION 11,931.00 106308 JAMES PATRICK BRUICH 80.00 106309 JANEVA WHITE 67.50 106310 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 1,794.85 106311 LARRY MONTGOMERY 25.00 106312 LEE TACKETT 132.35 106313 LISA GRAY 30.00 106314 LUCI A STEPHENS 37.50 106315 MARDEL CORPORATE OFFICE 39. 72 106316 MAXIAIDS 612.95 106317 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 445.00 106318 MRS CLARKS FOOD 2,246.25 106319 NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY 15.12 -106320 OTIS RAY BANKS 30.00 10 6321 PAMELA_J_A_C_K_S_O_N-------+------,- 30.00 106322 PATSY A RHODES 106323 PHELEISA WOODS 106324 PHILLENTHIA ERVIN 10 6325 RANDY BROWN 106326 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 106327 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 106328 SARAH SHEPPARD 106329 SCHOLASTIC INC 30.00 12.50 30.00 30.00 1,950.35 15.00 30.00 1,416.91 10 63 3 0 SCHOL_A_S_T_I_C_MA_G_A_Z_I_N_E_S----+-----2,049.21 -- 10633 l SUPER DUPER INC 4 97. 65 106332 THE SOUTHERN CO. NLR INC 29774 106333 THOMAS DWAYNE NOBLE III ---t----=-~ 255.00 10 6334 THOMAS E ANDERSON 30.00 ----------,t----- 106335 THOMAS W OLLIE SR 30.00 106336 TROUTMAN OIL CO INC - - - 2,639.59 Page T- 9 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 '\" I I . . ,\n, , --,. ...:.\n_._ .L'-_!,':\"\"=':ec-. \n\u0026gt;e\u0026gt; :, ,=:'#4G-b~.kAmt ~ ~-\"-. __ ,..,. ._. . ~ : 106337 TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITH 90. 72 106338 US NETCOM CORP 235.00 106339 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 936.35 106340 WENDY MILLER CONSULTING L 771. 00 106341 WILKINS CONSTRUCTION INC. 107,852.00 106342 WILLIAM BRIAN BRADY 525.00 106343 WILL-IAM DAVIS 60.00 106344 WILLIAM ZACHARY WATSON 30.00 106345 WILLIE JONES 60.00 106346 AAEA 163.57 106347 ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS-PR 6,307.45 106348 AEA 158.40 106349 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1,457.00 106350 AFLAC 1,916.00 106351 AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO 5,469.00 106352 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 9,225.00 106353 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 318,298.97 106354 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 1,300.00 106355 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 27,036.32 106356 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 466.83 106357 BANK OF THE OZARKS 500,684.16 - 106358 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 140.57 106359 C.T.A 5,660.46 106360 CINTAS 19.13 106361 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 181.17 106362 CONSECO LIFE 66.36 106363 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 160. 4 6 106364 DATAPATH ADMINISTRATIVE S 112. 50 106365 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 3,343.60 106366 DELTA DENTAL 26,306.61 106367 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 90,016.31 106368 DIVERSIFIED COLLECTION SE 49.00 106369 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 183,182.04 106370 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 381.21 106371 GREAT AMERICAN ADVISORS 3,787.11 106372 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 267.39 106373 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEME 425.00 106374 ING - 457 575.00 106375 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 1,585.00 Page T-10 North little Rock School District r 2.~_~~?--7~~ _,_~\n,t~\n106376 ING SERVICE CENTER 105.00 106377 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 106378 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 100.00 106379 JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY 50.35 106380 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2,394.52 106381 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN PL 656.87 106382 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 1,466.98 106383 MET LIFE 3,006.42 106384 NC CHILD SUPPORT 137.00 106385 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 36,382.67 106386 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 6,515.94 106387 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL 530.20 106388 OCSE 2,440.92 106389 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 90.08 106390 SBG-VAA 811. 00 106391 TASC 11,150.43 106392 u SABLE LIFE 1,979.42 106393 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 2,042.12 106394 u s ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 39.31 106395 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 6,719.93 f-- 106396 u s DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 243.24 106397 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COO 523.26 106398 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 1,621.85 106399 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 23,561.47 106400 VALIC-VARIABLE ANNUITY LI 50.00 106401 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 67.38 106402 BANK OF THE OZARKS 10.38 106403 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 28.92 106404 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 88.39 - - 106405 AASPA 300.00 - 106407 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 1,381.25 106408 ARKANSAS BUSINESS PUBLISH 855.00 106409 BINSWANGER GLASS COMPANY 22T:60 106410 BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS 395.39 - - 106411 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 62.21 106412 BUSINESS OFFICE PRODUCTS 504.47 --- 106413 CCI OF ARKANSAS INC 2,798.84 106414 CHILDCRAFT 195.48 - --- 106415 COCA-COLA USA 1,881.00 Page T- 11 North Little Rock School District 106416 COMC ABLES 305.30 106417 COMPASS LEARNING INC 44,065.90 106418 COUSINS VIDEO 96. 08 106419 DEANNA MANN 842.37 106420 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 4,554.57 106421 EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY 325.41 106422 ENERGY EDUCATION INC 10,100.00 106423 FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR 288.36 106424 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 158.87 106425 FRANKLIN COVEY 183.16 106426 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 338.70 106427 HM RECEIVABLES CO LLC 322.40 106428 HSU MUSIC WORKSHOP 15.00 106429 INFORMATION NETWORK OF AR 550.00 106430 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 27,823.51 106431 J-A ROGERS PROPERTY MANAG 1,500.00 106432 JACK,NELSON,JONES,FINK,JI 3,733.25 106433 JENNIFER WALKER 137 .17 106434 JENSEN LEARNING CORPORATI 360.00 106435 JOHNNY RICE 40.00 106436 JUPITER IMAGES 1,035.00 106437 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE ACTIVITY 476.42 106438 MALA ROGERS 209.60 106439 MARDEL CORPORATE OFFICE 118. 59 106440 MELISSA BARBER-PIKE VIEW 135.36 106441 MENTORING MINDS 100.45 106442 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 15.00 106443 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 434.76 106444 NAPA AUTO PARTS 72. 70 106445 NASCO 49.45 106446 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 15,658.24 106447 NLR WELDING SUPPLY 39.20 106448 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 549.35 106449, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS , 40.00 106450 OFFICE DEPOT 1,567.05 106451 PARTY CITY 176.04 106452 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY ACTI 52.64 106453 PLAY WITH A PURPOSE 240.23 106454 POE TRAVEL 454.98 Page T- 12 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ~lt~:L:.'\n-~. p, ._1:~.,.~ ~ :1 D\u0026lt;'\"\"iS 106455 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 83.13 106456 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 2,031.74 106457 SCHOLASTIC INC 36. 41 106458 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 163.66 106459 SPRINT 2,317.47 106460 STANLEY HARDWARcEo 137.10 106461 TAGGART FOSTER CURRENCE G 4,083.92 106462 TEACHER DIRECT 560.84 106463 TREADWAYE LECTRIC COMPANY 429.63 106464 TROUTMANO IL CO INC 25,429.68 106465 US FUEL 145.76 106466 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 470.58 106467 WALMARTC OMMUNITYB RC 214.21 106468 WITTENBERG DELONG\u0026amp; DAVIDS 2,533.00 106469 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 36. 96 106470 BANK OF THE OZARKS 4.96 1064 71 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 0.83 1064 72 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 13.86 106473 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 309.66 106474 BANK OF THE OZARKS 207.37 r--- 106475 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 13. 53 106476 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 65.18 f--- 106477 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 83.00 106478 ASHLEY HANAN-BELWOOD 32.64 -- 106479 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 136.42 106480 BROUKE REYNOLDS 22.36 106481 CAMBIUM LEARNING INC 502.72 f----- - 1--- 106482 CCI OF ARKANSAS INC 6,120.54 106483 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES 66,420.00 -- 106484 CLARK EXTERMINATINGC O IN 109.00 f- -- -- 106485 CORPORATE EXPRESS 153.18 106486 DEBBIE ROZZELL 28.91 106487 DEBRA GREENFILED-PARK HIL 65.36 106488 DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX 37.00 - 106489 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 1,378.68 ~ - -- 106490 DR ANGELAO LSEN 15 -:-00 106491 FOCUS ON MUSIC 233.44 106492 HASLER INC 588.20 -- 106493 HENDERSONS TATE UNI VERSI T 15.00 Page T-13 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 a --- \"'''\" =- -  :~, - .,.~ ~'-~'\"\" 0 \"\"'\"\"\"\"...\n..',_,.,\n., ~\na,~-che.ckArrr:E ... ' ~ , -~-  . ~ ~ 106494 HERFF JONES INC 564.28 106496 HOTEL CALIFORNIA 1,764.00 106497 INFORMATION VAULTING SERV 154.90 106498 INTERNATIONAL READING ASS 20.00 106499 JANET E THOMAS P.T. 571. 67 106500 JASON'S DELI-DELI PARTNER 65.83 106501 JEANETTE LOFTIS 17.37 106502 JIST PUBLISHING 57.95 106503 JODY EDRINGTON 3,598.00 106504 JUST RIBBONS 343.00 106505 KASN-KLRT FOX 16 1,297.83 106506 KAYLORS INCORPORATED 295.63 106507 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 178.45 106508 LENISHA BROADWAY-RRMS 691.92 106509 LOWE'S 141. 66 106510 MARY JEAN BOTTS 31. 82 106511 MEREDITH SHIPMAN 19.05 106512 METRO FOODS 5,558.80 106513 MICHELLE KEATON 13. 63 106514 MICHELLE NEEDLER 39.44 106515 NASCO 355.08 106516 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOLS 1,664.95 106517 OFFICE DEPOT 70.36 106518 OMNI CHEER 420.50 106519 PAT VANDERHOOF 50.00 106520 PETREVIA BOARDMAN-TECHNOL 34.99 106521 PHYLLIS MCDONALD 135.40 106522 PITNEY BOWES 62.03 106523 POE TRAVEL 3,396.40 106524 POWER PRODUCTS INC 166.44 106525 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE 543.00 106526 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE 3,554.42 106527 REBECCA REED-RRMS 1,614.00 106528 ROSIE COLEMAN 49.02 106529 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC 257.37 106530 SCHOOL SPECIALTY 770.27 106531 SHARON POOLE 1,174.00 106532 SUSAN MILLER 35.26 106533 TECH-KNOW INDUSTRIES 1,475.00 Page T- 14 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ,~\\,\\\"i''1'\\~.10 1'ie\"''tt ~ -  .. -~ ... ...,.-:_~:.\" _\n,.~\n106534 TESOL 2008 1,645.00 106535 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 550.00 106536 THE CENTER FOR TEACHER ED 199.00 106537 THE PARENT INSTITUTE 94.00 106538 UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERV 4,955.76 106539 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 424.37 106540 WALSWORTH PUBLISHING CO 15,000.00 106541 ADRIENNE BUSH 70.00 106542 AGATE CONFERENCE 115. 00 106543 AHA PROCESS INCORPORATED 5,456.99 106544 ALL AMERICAN INC. 616.10 106545 ALLIED PRINTING \u0026amp; SUPPLY 118.80 106546 ANTHONY CONNORS 30.00 106547 APPERSON PRINT MANAGEMENT 18.38 106548 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 355.96 106549 ARKANSAS ART CENTER 120.00 106550 ASCD 246.35 106551 ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC 4,840.77 106552 BACKGROUND INFO SYS. OF A 200.00 106553 BARNES AND NOBLE 191. 60 - - 106554 BILL LEFEAR 30.00 106555 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 30-:00 -- 106556 BOKARI A WILLIAMS 25.00 106557 CABOT FLORISTS 33. 43 -- - 106558 CALLOWAY HOUSE INC 39.80 106559 CHAMPIONSHIP PRODUCTIONS 232.97 106560 CHASITY NUTZ 28.38 106561 CHRISTOPHER JOHN KAMM 60.00 106562 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 105.63 106563 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 1,373.23 -- -- - - 106564 CORNELIUS ROBERTS 70.00 - 106565 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 1,299:sT - - 106566 DEANNA MANN 90.30 -- - -- - f- - 10 65 67 DEBORAH LUTZ 74.57 -- -- 106568 DISCIPLINE ASSOCIATES INC 1,194.00 106569 -- EAST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 817.26 - 106570 ED'S SUPPLY CO 958.15 106571 EDWIN E ETHERIDGE 80.00 --- - 106572 FLORIDA MICRO 4,357.50 Page T- 15 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 . _, ,.,.,. 106573 GARY L STEPHENS 37.50 106574 GARY L DAVIS 30.00 106575 GLADYS SWIFT 359.25 106576 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 1,667.53 106577 JACQUES MUMFORD 30.00 106578 JANISE GIBSON 30.00 106579 JATINA GIBSON 30.00 106580 JOHN L STANDLEY 30.00 106581 KASEY CATHEY 648.00 106582 KATHY VANCE CHAMBERS 648.00 106583 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HIL 119.61 106584 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 647.84 106585 LISA GRAY 30.00 106586 LISA RUTHANN KAMM 90.00 106587 LOWE'S 20.23 106588 LUCI A STEPHENS 37.50 106589 MARCIA CHAPPLE-DEAN 1,296.00 106590 MARVA SIMS 25.00 106591 MELISSA WALLS 540.00 106592 MULTICULTURAL AMERICA INC 2,200.00 106593 NASCO 719.16 106594 NORMAL P GILCHREST 80.00 106595 NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SC 95.00 106596 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOLS 675.00 106597 OFFICE DEPOT 118. 96 106598 OTIS RAY BANKS 30.00 106599 PHILLENTHIA ERVIN 30.00 106600 PHILLIP JONES 80.00 106601 QUESTIONS GALORE INC 224.00 106602 RANDALL H SANDEFUR 30.00 106603 ROBINETTE MCCARROLL 30.00 106604 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 261. 67 106605 SARAH ARNOLD 25.00 106606 SARAH SHEPPARD 30.00 106607 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 399.77 106608 SCHOLASTIC INC 462.30 106609 SHELLY SMITH-BOONE PARK 648.00 106610 SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; 78.14 106611 TAMMY POPE-LAKEWOOD MIDD 100.00 Page T- 16 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ~.:Q. ,., ~ '\"\"1111!.L~,i:'!}\nie'~~ti' '  .:t\nc ,., 106612 TEACHER DIRECT 667. 72 106613 THE MARKERBOARPDE OPLE 102. 96 106614 THOMASD WAYNEN OBLE III 25.00 106615 THOMAS E ANDERSON 30.00 106616 THOMAS W OLLIE SR 30.00 106617 TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITH 30.24 106618 UCA NSSLHA 80.00 106619 VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS 279.61 106620 WALMARTC OMMUNITYB RC 933.20 106621 WORLDA LMANACE DUCATION 848.80 106622 YOLANDA GIBSON 30.00 106623 ARKANSAS COUNCIL OF TEACH 165.00 106624 ARKANSAS COUNCIL OF TEACH 55.00 106625 ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY 500.Q0 106627 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 59,411.99 106628 CHARLOTTE DEROCHIE 65.00 106629 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 216.18 106630 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 70.06 106631 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT # 724.20 106632 DATAMAXO F ARKANSAS 28.38 106633 DISCOUNT TROPHIES INC 170.93 106634 FRIENDSHIP HOUSE 226.75 106635 HARCOURTA CHIEVE 135.08 106636 JANICE KUCALA-EAST CAMPUS 124.31 106637 KASEY CATHEY 41. 03 106638 KASN-KLRT FOX 16 1,297.83 106639 LEE TACKETT 131.29 106640 LEWIS \u0026amp; LEE DISTRIBUTING 4,976.00 106641 LONE STAR LEARNING 155.05 106642 LYNN HARRISON 62.35 - 106643 POE TRAVEL 1,172.98 106644 RSVP CATERING 513. 56 106645 REBECCA BAILEY 58.48 106646 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 193.79 106647 RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONIS 1,540.80 - ~ - 106648 RHONDA BALDRIDGE 166.45 106649 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 441.17 106650 SHARI MCGEHEE-WESTC AMPUS 87.94 - -- 106651 THE DBQ PROJECT 347.75 Page T- 17 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 -!ill . . ,, . \" ... , ... . ,. ... ~-.\n ~ , - .  . . 106652 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 436.03 106653 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 217.51 106654 WEEKLY READER 492.06 106655 WORDSMART 5,050.00 106656 ABIGAIL STONE 1,105.15 106657 AMANDA WILSON 218.00 106658 ANDREA H-AIN 47. 27 106659 ANGIE COLCLASURE 48.53 106660 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 3,171.66 106661 ARKANSAS ASSOC OF EDUCATI 110.00 106662 CARMEN ABDIN 918.00 106663 CORPORATE EXPRESS 59.03 106664 DANCE TEACHER 24.95 106665 DANNIELL HOMAN 218.00 106666 DEANNA MANN 11.18 106667 DEBORAH LUTZ 1,105.15 106668 DEBORAH LUTZ 35.86 106669 DIRECT SAFETY 90.94 106670 DONNA BATTE-RIDGEROAD MID 172. 00 106671 EMILY CLARK 167.10 106672 ERIYili RAINEY 328.00 106673 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 7,998.99 106674 GAIL HAYDEN 7. 72 106675 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 68.04 106676 HOLLY SCHIMMEL 218. 00 106677 HYATT REGENCY DALLAS 1,207.50 106678 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 314.51 106679 JENNIFER CONNER 328.00 106680 JODY EDRINGTON 218.00 106681 JONATHAN CALVIN 328.00 106682 JONES SCHOOL SUPPLY CO IN 16.47 106683 JOYCE CLEVELAND-LYNCH ORI 23.91 106684 KAY EWART 213. 28 106685 KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO 4,976.61 106686 KNOWLEDGE INDUSTRIES, INC 24,0. 80 106687 LORETTA HASSELL-LYNCH ORI 315.85 106688 MARIBEL SIEMS 218.00 10668 9 MARJORIE MCAFEE 213. 78 106690 MARY JEAN BOTTS 218.00 Page T-18 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 , ,  ie@~~t ' \u0026lt; \"\" . .., ,::\n.,,\n,,.-:.. ~ . 106691 MELISSA WALLS 328.00 106692 MICHELLE KELLY 918.00 106693 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 352.85 106694 OFFICE DEPOT 15.11 106695 PAIGE BANGS 123.00 106696 PAIGE WRIGHT-REDWOOD 218.00 106697 PERMA BOUND 257.43 106698 PHELEISA WOODS 328.00 106699 PHYLLIS MCDONALD 328.00 106700 PHYLLIS THOMPSON 328.00 106701 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 1,394.12 106702 RAQUEL BARTON-RCMS 328.00 106703 REBECCA REED-RRMS 123.00 106704 REBECCA REED-RRMS 172.00 106705 ROBYN BEARD 918.00 106706 SCHOLASTIC BOOK CLUBS INC 451. 40 106707 SHANDA COLEMAN 1,268.58 106708 SHARON OTWELL-ROSE CITY 328.00 106709 SHELLY SMITH-BOONE PARK 1,228.70 106711 SUSIE YOUNG 213.28 106712 TAKECIA COX-RIDGEROAD MID 172. 00 106713 TAMMY COLLIER 172. 00 106714 TAYLOR THIELEMIER 206.66 106715 TELISA HADLEY 328.00 106716 TERRI MARTIN 918.00 106717 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 1,080.00 106718 THOMAS BREWER 213.28 106719 UALR-APSI 1,000.00 ~ 106720 ZACH WATSON 220.42 106721 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 1,137.50 - 106722 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 497.42 106723 AARON BAILEY 80.00 -106724 AGATE CONFERENCE 150.00 106725 ANGIE COLCLASURE 13. 07 ~6726 ANTHONY CANTRELL 20.00 -- 106727 AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. 377.55 106728 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 190.46 1-- 106729 ARKANSAS ART CENTER 160.00 - 106730 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,992.70 Page T- 19 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ':~-- - _..,., _,J, ~t1i,,r,~~' -.,  -~ .c . ,,. . ,_,..,,,:\n:,\"'c'1,\n~.-,i~~,.\ni,q:-'~h ~- 'te'.' V ,..,...._ ,,.. .. ,. . \"' . .   ,- = ~'I\n:  ~,-~ \" o~. 106731 BARRY Y FISHER 30.00 106732 BASICS PLUS 13,201.26 106733 BOBBIE RIGGINS-ATHLETICS 20.00 106734 BRAD BOLDING 20.00 106735 CAREY SMITH 70.00 106736 CLASSROOM DIRECT 265.00 106737 CORPORATE EXPRESS ACCT# 533.49 106738 CUSTOM PRINTING 7,221.07 106739 DAMONICA D BROWN 20.00 106741 DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS 22,424.14 106742 DAVID W WYMER 80.00 106743 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 2,930.45 106744 DR ANGELA OLSEN 42.58 106745 EINSTRUCTION CORPORATION 2,020.00 106746 EVERGREEN COMMUNITY SCHOO 2,400.00 106747 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 10,433.20 106748 GAIL HAYDEN 103.20 106749 GARY L STEPHENS 25.00 106750 GLENN A BOLICK 30.00 106751 HARCOURT ASSESSMENT INC 1,324.14 106752 HOME DEPOT/GECF 734.23 106753 INDIAN HILLS ELEM. ACTIVI 270. 77 106754 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 165.27 106755 J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY 5,440.94 106756 JAMIE EUBANKS 1,102.50 106757 JANISE GIBSON 20.00 106758 JESSIE MCVAY 70.00 106759 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING co 43.58 106760 KELLIE SHEFFIELD 30.00 106761 KNOWLEDGE TREE 21. 48 106762 KONE INC 3,022.81 106763 KROGER COMPANY/PERSHING 74.12 106764 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 386.32 106765 LARA HUMPHRIES 1,-592.50 106766 LARRY MONTGOMERY 70.00 106767 LENNYS SUB SHOP 81.10 106768 LINDSEYS HOSPITALITY HOUS 591.10 106769 LOWE'S 193.38 106770 LUCI A STEPHENS 25.00 Page T- 20 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 ,:{ r.n 'C , - , 't\"~-:\n{...'~h.,~ ,c,,. '\"'\"\" ~1:\".\n.:,...,lt\na~-t,'. , 106771 LYNN HARRISON 400.77 106772 M \u0026amp; M ENTERPRISES 330.00 106773 M J COMMUNICATIONS 412.56 106774 MAISHA NICOLE JONES 55.00 106775 MARDEL CORPORATE OFFICE 95.00 106776 MCM 564.33 106777 MELISSA WALLS 80. 46 106778 MERIDAN 177.63 106779 MICHEELA J EUBANK 38.50 106780 MUSIC IS ELEMENTARY 226.65 106781 NASCO 41.21 106783 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 76,348.23 106784 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 353.83 106785 OTIS RAY BANKS 20: 00 106786 PAMELA JACKSON 20.00 106787 PATSY A RHODES 20.00 106788 PAULETTE BLEVINS 32.21 106789 PHELEISA WOODS 159.96 106790 PHYLLIS THOMPSON 55.00 106791 RANDALL H SANDEFUR 20.00 - 106792 RANDY BROWN 20.00 106793 REALLY GOOD STUFF INC 115. 44 106794 REGINALD MARTIN 70.00 10 67 95 RESOURCES FOR READING INC 119.94 106796 ROBIN LEE FRAZIER 126.56 106797 ROCKET PUBLISHING LLC 43.50 106798 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 27.02 -- - 1067 99 SARAH SHEPPARD 20.00 - 106800 SCANTRON CORPORATION 327.03 I- 106801 SCHOLASTIC INC 761.29 106802 SHANON NEUMEIER 30.00 106803 SHEMEKA STRONG 30.00 f- 106804 STACEY CHAMBERS 70.00 106805 STATE IMAGING SUPPLY 650.39 106806 STEFANIE ARNOLD 73.74 106807 STEPHEN WALLS 55.00 - - 106808 STEVEN CHIARA 80.00 - 106809 TEACHER DIRECT 283.54 -- 106810 TEACHERS PET INC 221.40 Page T- 21 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 -- :\n:.\n,..- -~-~ . \"\"1 \"m c.~C' -~ .., . 106811 THOMAS DWAYNE NOBLE III 25.00 106812 THOMAS E ANDERSON 20.00 106813 THOMAS W OLLIE SR 20.00 106814 TROUTMAN OIL CO INC 21,129.90 106815 U C A OFFICE OF STUDENT 500.00 10,6816 UCA NSSLHA 80.00 106817 UTILITX BILLING SERVICES 411.56 106818 VARITRONICS/BRADY WORLDWI 8,348.90 106819 VIRCO MFG CORPORATION 221.74 106820 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 1,090.35 106821 WEST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 115.83 106822 WILLIAM ZACHARY WATSON 20.00 106823 WILLIE JONES 70.00 106824 YOLANDA GIBSON 20.00 106825 YOUTH HOME INC 7,535.00 106826 ARKANSAS ASSOC OF EDUCATI 110.00 106827 BF HURLEY MAT co 977.28 106828 DARREN BROWN 140.00 106829 HSU MUSIC WORKSHOP 15.00 106830 J J KELLER 1,398.60 106831 NLRSD TRANSPORATION DEPT 1,985.50 106832 NLRSD WAREHOUSE 1,400.00 106833 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 769.29 106834 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS 201.50 106835 RICHARD ALEXANDER 168.00 106836 RICHARD ALEXANDER 50.54 106837 SHANDA COLEMAN 453.72 106838 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 81. 23 106839 AEA 489.27 106840 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 197.50 106841 AFLAC 622.30 106842 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 300.00 106843 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 37,383.24 106844 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 63.61 106845 BANK OF THE OZARKS 56, 393. 39 106846 BRIAN NICHOLS ATTORNEY 191. 4 4 106847 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 106848 CINTAS 90.07 106849 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 114. 26 Page T- 22 North Little Rock School District Check Listing For Period 07 of Year 2007-2008 : ...1- 106850 CONSECO LIFE 10.58 106851 COLLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 347.40 106852 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 106853 DAVID D. COOP TRUSTEE DEB 60.01 106854 DELTA DENTAL 3,618.37 106855 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 8,811.51 106856 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 34,295.75 106857 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 537.50 106858 ING SERVICE CENTER 180.00 106859 JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE 175.38 106860 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 499.39 106861 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN, TROS 373.00 106862 KANSAS PAYMENT CENTER SGO 46.15 106863 KEVMAR CAPITAL CORP 25.00 106864 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOOTHWE 3,670.74 106865 MET LIFE 761. 49 106866 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 5,248.12 106867 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 83.46 106868 NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE 1,176.21 106869 OCSE 1,732.47 106870 OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT E 173. 05 106871 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 286.39 106872 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1,827.32 106873 ST VINCENT HEALTH SYSTEM 70.00 106874 TASC 208.16 106875 u s ABLE LIFE 173.40 106876 u s ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 573.84 106877 u s ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 4.93 - -- 106878 u s ABLE LIFE/CANCER 1,575.37 106879 u s DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE 106.33 ~ 8 so UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 57.00 106881 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 27.90 - 106882 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 910.00 106883 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 510.10 106884 -- BANK OF THE OZARKS 421.35 106885 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 105.80 --- 106886 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOOTHWE 33.21 106887 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 345.06 '\"7:06888 ACE GLASS COMPANY INC. 731.41 Page T- 23 North Little Rock School District ea! 20?7 ~2-~~~~~J\n1068\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_992","title":"NLRSD, Ten Year Master Plan, 2009-2019","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2007-11-26"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School improvement programs","School facilities","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["NLRSD, Ten Year Master Plan, 2009-2019"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/992"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nNLRSD TEN YEAR MASTER PLAN 2009-2019 ,. Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 0910-6002-074 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Administration 0910-6002-075 6002000 - 6002  Administration - Administration 0910-6002-076 6002000  6002  Administration  Administration 1011-6002-029 6002000  6002 - Administration - Administration 1011-6002-037 6002000  6002 - Administration  Administration 1011-6002-051 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-003 6002000 - 6002  Administration - Administration 1112-6002-007 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-013 6002000 - 6002 -Administration - Administration 1112-6002-014 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-015 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-016 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-017 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Administration 1112-6002-018 6002000 - 6002 -Administration Administration 1112-6002-019 6002000 - 6002  Administration - Administration 1112-6002-020 6002000 - 6002 - Administration  Administration 1112-6002-021 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-022 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-023 6002000 - 6002 - Administration  Administration 1112-6002-024 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-025 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1112-6002-026 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-001 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-010 6002000  6002  Administration - Administration 1213-6002-011 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-012 6002000 - 6002 -Administration -Administration 1213-6002-013 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-017 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-019 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-020 6002000 - 6002  Administration - Administration 1213-6002-026 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-027 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-028 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-029 6002000 - 6002 -Administration -Administration 1213-6002-032 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-033 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-034 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-036 6002000  6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-037 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-038 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-039 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-040 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-041 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration November 26, 2007 Project Name Administration Roofing Improvement Administration Transportation Roofing Improvement Administration Track Improvement Administration Indoor Practice Facility with parking Administration Football Turf Improvement Rose City Elementary Demolition Administration Transportation Plumbing Improvement Administration Technology up-grade Admin Bldg Fire and Safety Improvement Administration Annex Elevator Addition Administration Cafeteria Warehouse Addition Administration Transportation Site Improvement Administration Elevator Addition Admin Mtn Whse Fire and Safety Improvement Admin Cale Whse Fire and Safety Administration Maintenance Site Improvement Admin Stadium Electrical Improvement Admin Stadium Exterior Improvement Admin Stadium HVAC Improvement Admin Stadium Interior Improvement Admin Stadium Plumbing Improvement Administration Transportation Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Adm Annex Site Improvement Admin Bldg Specialities Admin Building HVAC Improvement Administration Annex Exterior Improvement Administration Bldg Site Improvement Admin Annex Plumbing Improvement Admin Annex Specialities Improvement Admin Bldg Electrical Improvement Admin Annex Electrical Improvement RECEIVED Admin Annex Fire and Safety Inspection APR1 ~~ 2008 Admin Annex HVAC Improvement Admin Annex Interior Improvement OFFIOCFE DESEGREGtA~OTtIOUTNO NMG Admin Transportation HVAC Improvement Admin Transportation Interior Improvement Administation Bldg Interior Improvement Administration Maintenance Exterior Improvement Admin Track Plumbing Improvement Admin Transportation Electrical Improvement Admin Transportation Exterior Improvement Administration Cafeteria Whse Ext Improvement Administration Exterior Improvement 1 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1213-6002-042 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-043 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-044 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-045 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-046 6002000 - 6002 -Administration -Administration 1213-6002-047 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-048 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-049 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1213-6002-050 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1415-6002-007 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1415-6002-008 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 1718-6002-014 6002000 - 6002 - Administration - Administration 0910-6002-031 6002050 - 6002 -Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-032 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-033 6002050 - 6002 -Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-034 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-037 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-038 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 0910-6002-098 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 1415-6002-004 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School - Elementary 1112-6002-002 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy - High 1112-6002-027 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy - High 1516-6002-001 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy - High 1516-6002-002 6002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy- High 1516-6002-010 6002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy - High 1516-6002-022 6002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy- High 1516-6002-023 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy - High 1516-6002-050 6002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy- High 1516-6002-077 6002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy- High 0910-6002-016 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1213-6002-008 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1516-6002-011 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1516-6002-012 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1516-6002-073 6002053 -6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1516-6002-074 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary November 26, 2007 Project Name Admin Cafeteria Interior Improvement Admin Cafeteria Warehouse Electrical Improvement Admin Maintenance Warehouse HVAC Improvement Admin Maintenance Warehouse Plumbing Improvement Admin Min Whse Specialities Improvement Admin Cafeteria Warehouse Plumbing Improvement Admin Cafeteria Whse Specialities Improvement Admin Maintenance Interior Improvement Admin Maintenance Warehouse Electrical Improvement Admin Bldg. Plumbing Improvement Admin Stadium Plumbing Improvement Admin Arena Interior Improvement Amboy Elementary Addition Amboy Elementary Electrical Improvement Amboy Elementary Exterior Improvements Amboy Elementary HVAC Improvement Amboy Elementary Site Improvement Amboy Elementary Specialties Improvement Amboy Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Amboy Elementary Plumbing Improvement Argenta Academy Site Improvement Argenta Fire and Safety Improvement Argenta Academy Plumbing Improvement Argenta Academy Roofing Improvement Argenta Academy Specialities Improvement Argenta Electrical Improvement Argenta Exterior Argenta Interior Improvement Argenta Academy HVAC Improvements Belwood Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Belwood Elementary HVAC Improvement Belwood Elementary Electrical Improvement Belwood Elementary Exterior Improvement Belwood Elementary Site Improvement Belwood Elementary Specialities Improvement 2 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1516-6002-075 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary 1516-6002-080 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School - Elementary Project Name Belwood Elementary Plumbing Improvement Belwood Elementary Interior Improvement 0910-6002-017 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Exterior Improvements Elementary 0910-6002-022 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park HVAC Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-048 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Fire And Safety Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-097 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Roofing Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-028 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Addition Elementary 1112-6002-029 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-030 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Site Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-031 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Interior Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-032 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Plumbing Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-033 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School - Boone Park Elementary Specialties Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-012 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Fire and Safety Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-021 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Addition 2 Elementary 1112-6002-034 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Site Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-035 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Specialties Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-036 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Interior Improvements Elementary 1112-6002-037 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-038 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-039 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Exterior Improvement Elementary 1415-6002-005 6002055 - 6002 - Crestwood Elementary School - Crestwood Elementary Plumbing Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-078 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Glenview Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-013 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Glenview Elementary Specialities Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-014 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Glenview Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-015 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Glenview Elementary Interior Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-039 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Elementary 1718-6002-040 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Elementary 1718-6002-044 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Elementary Glenview Elementary Electrical Improvement Glenview Elementary Exterior Improvement Glenview Elementary Plumbing Improvement 3 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1718-6002-045 6002056 - 6002 - Glenview Elementary School - Elementary Project Name Glenview Elementary Site Improvement 0910-6002-080 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Fire and Safety Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-040 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Interior Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-041 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Specialities Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-042 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Elementary Addition Elementary 1213-6002-060 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Site Improvement Elementary 1415-6002-001 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 1415-6002-002 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School - Indian Hills Exterior Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-068 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School- Indian Hills Plumbing Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-078 6002057 - 6002 - Indian Hills Elementary School- Indian Hills Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-082 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Interior Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-099 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-069 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School- Lakewood Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-070 6002058- 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Plumbing Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-024 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Site Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-025 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Specialities Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-041 6002058 - 6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Exterior Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-042 6002058 -6002 - Lakewood Elementary School - Lakewood Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-049 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Electrical Improvement 0910-6002-060 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Roof Improvement 0910-6002-061 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Site Improvement 0910-6002-064 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Fire and Safety Improvement 0910-6002-066 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle P. E. Addition 1112-6002-043 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Exterior Improvement 1112-6002-044 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Specialties Improvement 1112-6002-045 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Interior Improvement 1112-6002-046 6002070 - 6002 - Lakewood Middle School - Middle Lakewood Middle Plumbing Improvement 0910-6002-084 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-086 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Roof Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-088 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Fire and Safety Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-089 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Interior Improvements Elementary 4 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type Project Name 1112-6002-047 6002060 -6002- Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-048 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Exterior Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-049 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Plumbing Improvement Elementary 1415-6002-009 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Site Improvement Elementary 1415-6002-010 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Specialties Improvements Elementary 1718-6002-050 6002060 - 6002 - Lynch Drive Elementary School - Lynch Drive Elementary Addition Elementary 1011-6002-015 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Fire and Safety Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-016 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary HVAC Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-017 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Interior Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-019 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Roof Improvement - Elementary 1112-6002-050 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Electrical Improvement - Elementary 1112-6002-051 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Exterior Improvements - Elementary 1112-6002-052 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Plumbing Improvement - Elementary 1112-6002-053 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Elementary Specialties Improvement - Elementary 1112-6002-054 6002061 - 6002 - Meadow Park Elementary School Meadow Park Site Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-022 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Fire and Safety Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-005 6002063 - 6002- North Heights Elementary School North Heights Site improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-006 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Specialities Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-033 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Exterior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-034 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights HVAC Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-035 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Plumbing Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-036 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Electrical Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-037 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Elementary Interior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-038 6002063 - 6002 - North Heights Elementary School North Heights Elementary Roofing Improvement - Elementary 0910-6002-039 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East East Campus Fine Arts Site Improvement Campus - High 0910-6002-040 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East East Campus Fine Arts Fire and Safety Improvement Campus - High 0910-6002-042 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East East Cafeteria Restroom addition Campus - High 0910-6002-043 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East East Cafe Fire and Safety Improvement Campus - High 5 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1011-6002-001 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1011-6002-011 6002075-6002- North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1011-6002-012 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1011-6002-027 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1011-6002-039 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-006 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-010 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-011 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-012 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-055 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-056 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-057 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1112-6002-058 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-031 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-051 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-052 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-053 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-054 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1213-6002-059 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-003 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-005 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-006 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-007 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-008 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-009 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-017 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-018 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-019 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High November 26, 2007 Project Name East Aux Gym Fire and Safety Improvement East Campus Main Fire and Safety Improvement East Campus Main Gym Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement East Addition East Main Electrical Improvement East Campus Main Gym Electrical Improvement East Campus Main Specialities Improvement East Campus Fine Arts Interior Improvement East Campus Main Electrical Improvement East Campus Main Exterior Improvement East Fine Arts Electrical Improvement East Campus Main Gym Site Improvement East Campus Gym HVAC Improvement East Aux Gym Exterior Improvement East Fine Arts Plumbing Improvement East Fine Arts Specialities Improvement East Main Interior Improvement East Main Gym Plumbing Improvement East Aux Gym Electrical Improvement East Campus Fine Arts HVAC Improvement East Campus Aux Gym Interior Improvement East Cafeteria HVAC Improvement East Cafeteria Plumbing Improvement East Cafeteria Electrical Improvement East Aux Gym Plumbing Improvement East Campus Fine Arts Exterior Improvements East Campus Cafeteria Interior Improvement East Campus Cafeteria Specialities 6 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1516-6002-027 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-028 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-029 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-032 6002075 -6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-063 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-064 6002075 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-065 6002075 -6002 - North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 1516-6002-067 6002075 - 6002- North Little Rock Hs-East Campus - High 0910-6002-051 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-052 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-053 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-054 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-055 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-056 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 0910-6002-057 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus  High 0910-6002-100 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1011-6002-008 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1011-6002-036 6002076 - 6002- North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1011-6002-046 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1011-6002-047 6002076 - 6002  North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-021 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-022 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-023 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-024 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-025 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1213-6002-058 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1314-6002-001 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-020 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus  High November 26, 2007 Project Name East Campus Aux. Gym HVAC Improvement East Campus Main Gym Interior Improvement East Campus Main Gym Specialities Improvement East Campus Gym Exterior Improvement East Campus Aux Gym Specialties East Campus Cafeteria Exterior Improvement East Campus Aux Gym Site Improvement East Campus Main Plumbing Improvements West Science Fire and Safety Improvement West PE Fire and Safety Improvement West Gym Roof Improvement West Main HVAC Improvement West Campus Music Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement West Campus Addition West Campus Fine Arts Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement West Campus Main Fire and Safety Improvement West Arts Addition West Campus Science Bldg Interior Improvement West Music Addition West Campus Main Plumbing Improvements West Science Site Improvement West Campus Science Specialities Improvement West Creative Arts Site Improvement West Fine Arts Electrical Improvement West Gym Electrical Improvement West Science Plumbing Improvement West Campus Science Bldg HVAC Improvement West Campus Fine Arts Exterior Improvement 7 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1516-6002-021 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-025 6002076 - 6002- North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-026 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-030 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-031 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-033 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-034 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-035 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-036 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-037 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-038 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-039 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-040 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-041 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-043 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-044 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-045 6002076- 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-046 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-047 6002076- 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-048 6002076- 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-049 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-052 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-053 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-054 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-055 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-056 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-057 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High 1516-6002-058 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West Campus - High November 26, 2007 Project Name West Campus Creative Arts Plumbing Improvement West PE Plumbing Improvement West Gym Plumbing Improvement West PE Site Improvement West Science Electrical Improvement West Campus PE Bldg Interior Improvement West Campus Gym Interior Improvement West Campus Gym Specialities Improvement West Campus Main Interior Improvement West Campus Main Specialties Improvement West Campus Music Interior Improvement West Campus Gym Fire and Safety Improvement West Campus Main Electrical Improvement West Campus Main Exterior Improvement West Campus Fine Arts Interior Improvement West Campus Fine Arts Specialities Improvement West Campus PE Bldg. Electrical Improvement West Campus Gym Exterior Improvement West Main Roof Improvement West Main Site Improvement West Music Bldg Electrical Improvement West Music HVAC Improvement West Music Plumbing Improvement West Music Site Improvement West PE Bldg. Exterior Improvement West Gym Site Improvement West PE Bldg. Specialities Improvement West Campus Music Exterior Improvement 8 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type Project Name 1516-6002-059 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West West Campus Music Specialities Improvement Campus - High 1516-6002-060 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West West Campus P.E. Bldg HVAC Improvement Campus - High 1516-6002-061 6002076- 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West West Fine Arts HVAC Improvement Campus - High 1516-6002-062 6002076 - 6002 - North Little Rock Hs-West West Campus Science Exterior Improvement Campus - High 1213-6002-007 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Specialities Improvement Elementary 1213-6002-057 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Interior Improvement Elementary 1516-6002-079 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Elementary Site Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-012 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-013 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Elementary Exterior Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-046 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-047 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill HVAC Improvement Elementary 1718-6002-048 6002064 - 6002 - Park Hill Elementary School - Park Hill Plumbing Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-003 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Fire and Safety Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-004 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary HVAC Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-006 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Addition Elementary 1112-6002-059 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary lnterioir Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-060 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Plumbing Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-061 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Site Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-062 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Electrical Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-063 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Elementary Specialties Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-064 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Exterior Improvement Elementary 1112-6002-065 6002065 - 6002 - Pike View Elementary School - Pike View Roofing Improvement Elementary 0910-6002-047 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar Street Middle Annex Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement Middle 0910-6002-072 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar St. Middle Main Fire and Safety Improvement Middle 1011-6002-005 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar Street Middle Main Site Improvement Middle 1011-6002-006 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar St. Middle Main Specialties Improvement Middle 1011-6002-009 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar St Middle Annex HVAC Improvement Middle 1011-6002-023 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Poplar Street Middle Main Exterior Improvement Middle 9 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type 1011-6002-024 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1011-6002-273 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-014 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-015 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-016 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-030 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-055 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1213-6002-056 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle 1718-6002-049 6002059 - 6002 - Poplar Street Middle School - Middle Project Name Poplar Street Middle Main Electrical Improvement Poplar Middle School Main Interior Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Interior Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Exterior Improvement Poplar St. Middle Annex Electrical Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Specialities Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Site Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Plumbing Improvement Poplar Street Middle Annex Roofing 1011-6002-004 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Bldg. Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-025 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-026 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Primary Fire and Safety Improvement - Elementary 1011-6002-053 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Campus Demolition - Elementary 1718-6002-002 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Bldg. Exterior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-003 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Bldg. HVAC Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-004 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Bldg. Interior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-007 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Roof Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-008 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Bldg. Interior Site Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-009 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Interior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-010 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Plumbing Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-011 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Int. Plumbing Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-015 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Roof Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-016 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Site Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-017 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Specialities Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-018 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Electrical Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-019 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Exterior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-020 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary HVAC Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-021 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Intermediate Site Improvement - Elementary 10 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type Project Name 1718-6002-022 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Exterior Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-023 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Specialities Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-026 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Primary Roof Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-027 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Interior HVAC Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-028 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Electrical Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-029 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Main Intermediate Electrical Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-030 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Plumbing Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-031 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Site Improvement - Elementary 1718-6002-032 6002067 - 6002 - Redwood Early Childhood Center Redwood Pre-K Primary Specialities Improvement - Elementary 0910-6002-041 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Site Improvement - Middle 1112-6002-009 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle HVAC Improvement - Middle 1112-6002-066 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Exterior Improvements - Middle 1112-6002-245 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Fire and Safety Improvement - Middle 1415-6002-006 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Electrical Improvement - Middle 1516-6002-004 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Specialties Improvements - Middle 1516-6002-071 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Interior Improvement -Middle 1516-6002-072 6002702 - 6002 - Ridgeroad Middle Charter School Ridgeroad Middle Plumbing Improvement - Middle 0910-6002-044 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Site Improvement 0910-6002-094 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Fire and Safety Improvement 0910-6002-095 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle HVAC Improvement 1112-6002-004 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Electrical Improvement 1112-6002-005 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Exterior Improvements 1112-6002-067 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Specialties Improvements 1516-6002-076 6002077 - 6002  Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Plumbing Improvement 1718-6002-043 6002077 - 6002 - Rose City Middle School - Middle Rose City Middle Interior Improvement 0910-6002-069 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Fire and Safety lmprovment School - Elementary 0910-6002-070 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary HVAC Improvement School - Elementary 0910-6002-071 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Interior Improvement School - Elementary 1112-6002-068 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Plumbing Improvement School - Elementary 1112-6002-069 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Site Improvement School - Elementary 1112-6002-070 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Exterior Improvements School - Elementary 11 of352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number School Number, Name, and Type Project Name 1112-6002-071 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street El Specialties Improvement School - Elementary 1112-6002-072 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Electrical Improvement School - Elementary 1415-6002-003 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Addition School - Elementary 1718-6002-001 6002069 - 6002 - Seventh Street Fine Arts Elem. Seventh Street Elementary Roof Improvement School - Elementary 12 of 352 - Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-074 -Administration Roofing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The Administration Building needs the asbestos removed, slope added, and modem flashing methods used to improve the roof system. The Transportation Buildings need metal roofs improved. This was formerly 6002-98. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 06/01/20091 12/31/2010 Planned Total Cost $600,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Roofing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 60,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $60,0001 $540,0001 sol 13 of 352 e Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-075 - Administration Transportation Roofing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the roof on all building at Transportation with insulation and new roof system. This was formerly 6002-438. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $150,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Roofing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 22,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $150,0001 sol sol sol sol 14 of 352 - Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-076 -Administration Track Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the track by demolition of the existing and installing an improved surface. This was formerly 6002-443. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $1,000,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems I Playgrounds / Playfields Area (GSF) 1,2001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol s,.ooo,oooj sol sol sol soj 15 of352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1011-6002-029 - Administration Indoor Practice Facility with parking School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: A clear 50 yard indoor practice facility with offices, dressing rooms, weight rooms, and other normal areas. This was formerly 6002- 307 . Design Start Date 07/01/2009 Total Cost $3,800,0001 Funding Code I Local Construction Start Date Comp. Date 07/01/20101 06/30/2011 Facility Type I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Status Planned November 26, 2007 Project Type I New Building Project Category I Suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) 10,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 111li QI $01 $01 $3.aoo.oool $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 16 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1011-6002-037 -Administration Football Turf Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the turf at the Stadium to one that has a manufacturer. This was forrnerty 6002-444. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2009 07101,201 o 1 06/30/2011 Planned Total Cost $600.0001 Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems I Playgrounds/ Playfields Area (GSF) 1s,oool Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $0! sol sol ssoo,oool sol sol sol sol sol sol sol 17 of352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: Project Type 1011-6002-051 - Rose City Elementary Demolition I General Renovation School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: Project Category I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration I Condition - Current Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Demo building. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status Area (GSF) 07/01/2009 07/01/20101 06/30/2011 Planned ol Total Cost $135,oool Planning Year Funding Code Facility Type Created Changed  I Partnership ! Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 !R ~o! $01 $ol $13s,oool $ol $ol sol $01 $01 sol $01 18 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-003 -Administration Transportation Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Renovate the lounge and dispatch at Transportation. This was formerly 6002-143. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $320,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) 4,oool Planning Year November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Walls Interior Other Electrical Other Plumbing Specialties Structural Accessibility Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 r-1 $0 I $01 $0 I $320,000 I $01 $01 $0 I $01 $01 $0 I 19 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-007 -Administration Technology up-grade School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The current District telephone systems are completely out of date and repair parts are found on the internet. An Administrative system needs implemented so the schools can follow in the near future. This was formerly 6002-96. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 01101120111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $450,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 34,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 I~ $01 $01 $al $al $450,oool $al $al $al sol $01 sol 20 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-013 - Admin Bldg Fire and Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the buiding safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-676. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/2011 I 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $80,0001 Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 16,7121 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 I 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol sao.ooI o sol 21 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-014 - Administration Annex Elevator Addition School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Add elevator to connect the 3 levels of the Administrative Annex Building for ADA access. This was formerly 6002-265. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $320,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type I Addition to Building Project Category !suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) 34,oool Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $320,0001 $01 22 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-015  Administration Cafeteria Warehouse Addition School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000  6002  Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Add storage space to Cafeteria Warehouse and improve suitability of existing dry storage. This was formerly 6002-266. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $1,850,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type !Addition to Building Project Category I Suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) 8,oool Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol s1.sso.oool 23 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-016 -Administration Transportation Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the parking and drives, the walkways, the lighting, and the drainage by hard surface improvements. This was formerly 6002- 445. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $210,0001 Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot/ Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Site Lighting Drainage Area (GSF) 10,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ,~1 $01 $01 $01 $210,0001 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 24 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-017 - Administration Elevator Addition School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Add elevator to Administration Building for ADA access and function. This was formerly 6002-306. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date 07/01/2010 07/01/2011 I 06/30/2012 Total Cost $240,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Status Planned November 26, 2007 Project Type I Addition to Building Project Category I suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $240,0001 25 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-018 -Admin Min Whse Fire and Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the buiding safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-679. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $40,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $40,0001 26 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-019 - Admin Cafe Whse Fire and Safety School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the buiding safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-678. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07101,20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $20,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 27 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-020 - Administration Maintenance Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the drive, parking and walks areas to the shop. The drainage must be considered since this site is in the 50 year flood plain by 1 o. This was formerly 6002-439. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 01,01,20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $68,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot/ Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Drainage Area (GSF) 10.0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $68,0001 28 of 352 - Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-021 - Admin Stadium Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-469. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $6s,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 6981 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 !iill$1ll soi soi soi sss,oooi sol sol soi sol soi soi 29 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-022  Admin Stadium Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000  6002  Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need to be improved with modem systems. The exterior doors and hardware need to be improved for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002- 451. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $225,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition  Current Area (GSF) November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $225,0001 30 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: I 1112-6002-023  Admin Stadium HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000  6002  Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. Thw was formerly 6002-463. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $45,0001 Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category I Condition  Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $0! sol sol sol S4s,oool sol sol $al sol sol sol 31 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-024 - Admin Stadium Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 60002-457. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $360,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $360,000 I 32 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-025 - Admin Stadium Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-035. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/2011 I 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $85,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 sol sol sol $85,oool $01 sol $01 $ol sol sol 33 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-026 - Administration Transportation Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the building safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $55,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,0001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 --~~ $ol $01 sol $55,oool $01 $01 sol $01 sol sol 34 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-001 -Adm Annex Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All parking, drives, walks and pick up areas need to be improved and new areas added for parking and drives with a new drop off area and associated walks. The playfields need to be refurbished. The site lighting and fencing need to be improved for security reasons. The drainage has been a problem for years and improvement would be most appreciated by downstream neighbors. This was formerly 6002-447. v~~lj --11..ill--u- Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $240,0001 Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot / Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Playgrounds/ Playfields Site Lighting Fencing Drainage Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $240,0001 35 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: j 1213-6002-010 - Admin Bldg Specialities School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these up-dates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 682. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $90,0ool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Specialties Project Category j Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 sol sol sol sol soo,oool sol sol sol sol sol 36 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-011 -Admin Building HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This was formerly 6002-458. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $320,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 $320,0001 $01 37 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-012 - Administration Annex Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need improved with modem systems. The exterior doors and hardware need improved for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002-448. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 01101120121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $190,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category l Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $190,0001 38 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist.  ~ apifal ProjectD etail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-013 -Administration Bldg Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The walks need improved for ADA and safety. The parking lot needs improved to drain after rain and the drive also needs to drain. Site lighting needs improved and fencing needs added for safety. This was formerly 6002-440. Design Construction N ~ r--, _ _.. n-'- r, --- n-'- 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $118,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot/ Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Site Lighting Fencing Drainage Area (GSF) 17.oool Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 j~jl:it4ol sol $01 $01 sol $11a,oool sol $01 $01 $ol $01 39 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-017 - Admin Annex Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-471. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $90,oool Funding Code Facility Type I local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation !Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 1~$01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $90,0001 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 40 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-019 - Admin Annex Specialities Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these up-dates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 683. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $60,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 1Mi$ol $01 $01 sol $01 $60.0001 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 41 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-020 - Admin Bldg Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with moder efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-464. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $95,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 16,7121 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 I #I $01 $01 $01 $01 $95,oool sol sol sol $01 $01 42 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-026 - Admin Annex Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with moder efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-465. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $120,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 I ~soj sol sol sol sol s120,oool sol sol sol $01 sol 43 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-027 - Admin Annex Fire and Safety Inspection School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the buiding safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-677. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $160,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $160.0001 44 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-028 - Admin Annex HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This was formerly 6002-459. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $1,100,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $ol $01 $al $01 sol $1,100.0001 sol sol sol sol sol 45 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I , . . Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-029 -Admin Annex Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-029. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $160,oooi Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 32,7411 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $ol sol sol sol sol s1so,oool sol sol sol sol soi I 46 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I  tapital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-032 -Admin Transportation HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This was formerly 6002-462. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $75,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 20,4561 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $0! sol sol sol sol s1s.oool sol sol sol sol soj 47 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-033 - Admin Transportation Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-455. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $85,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $85,0001 48 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-034 -Administation Bldg Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All interior doors and hardware need improved for safety and ADA. This will involve redoing the walls and jams. All interior floors need improved. All interior walls need improved with modern finishes. All ceiling except front halls need improved. This was formerly 6002-442. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $4so,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,4401 Planning Year Building Systems Exterior Doors Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $450.000 1 sol 49 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-036 -Administration Maintenance Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need improved with modem systems. The exterior doors and hardware need improved for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002-449. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $70,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $70,0001 50 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-037 - Admin Track Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-675. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $60,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation !Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 1,2001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Sll! sol sol sol sol S60,oool sol sol sol sol sol 51 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-038-Admin Transportation Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-468. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $65,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 20,4561 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 $01 $65,0001 $01 52 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-039 - Admin Transportation Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need improved with modern systems. The exterior doors and hardware need improved for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002-450. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $125,oool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 20,4561 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $12s.oool $01 $01 53 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-040 -Administration Cafeteria Whse Ext Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the exterior of the Cafeteria Warehouse by waterproofing the walls, replacing the windows with energy efficient, and improving all the exterior doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-446. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $85,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $85,000 I 54 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. X ., , ~llpital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-041 - Administration Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior walls need improved with waterproofing and tuckpointing. Mold is a problem in this building. The windows need improved with windows that are efficient and waterproof. All exterior doors and hardware need improved for safety and ADA. This was formerly 6002-441. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $145,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,4401 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $145,0001 55 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-042 -Admin Cafeteria Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-453. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $48,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ISIIII $01 $01 $01 $01 $48.0001 $01 $01 $0 1 $0 1 $01 56 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-043 -Admin Cafeteria Warehouse Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: j eoo2000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-043. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $45,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 IE/Dg! $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $45,000 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I 57 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-044 -Admin Maintenance Warehouse HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This was formerly 6002-461. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $60,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 lffl $0! $ol $01 $01 $ol $60,oool sol sol $01 $ol $01 58 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-045 - Adm in Maintenance Warehouse Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-473. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $45,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ~*/~~.! $al $al $01 sol $45,oool $al sol $01 sol $01 59 of 352 I   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-046 - Admin Min Whse Specialities Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these up-dates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 684. Design Construction Star1 Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $30,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire/ Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $30,0001 60 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-047 -Admin Cafeteria Warehouse Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-472. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $30,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol $30,0001 sol sol sol 61 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-048 - Admin Cafeteria Whse Specialities Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these up-dates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 683. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $20,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 10,6181 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol sol sol sol s20.ooI o sol sol sol sol 62 of 352  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-049 -Admin Maintenance Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-454. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $56,0ool Funding Code Facility Type !Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category !condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 sol sol $56,0001 sol sol 63 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-050 - Admin Maintenance Warehouse Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-467. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $45,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 12,1001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $45.0001 64 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1415-6002-007 - Adm in Bldg. Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002000 - 6002 - Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2013 07/01/20141 06/30/2015 Planned Total Cost $55,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $55,0001 65 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1415-6002-008 - Admin Stadium Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000 - 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system and faucets and fixtures. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2013 07/01/20141 06/30/2015 Planned Total Cost $95,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Local i Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 $95.0001 66 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1718-6002-014 -Admin Arena Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002000- 6002 -Administration Building Number and Name: Project Soope: This project will improve the interior by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-456. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2016 07/01/20171 06/30/2018 Planned Total Cost $150,oool Funding Code Facility Type I local I Non-Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $150.0001 67 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-031 -Amboy Elementary Addition School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Amboy currently has portable classrooms as does a nearby elementary school. This addition would allow for the removal of these portables. Also this school is currently on 3 different levels with one level not accessiable at all for handicapped persons. The addition could contain an elevator and lift to connect the various levels together for ADA accessibility. This will also be the third addition of classrooms to this school so the kitchen and cafeteria is completely inadequate and these two small additions would allow the building to continue to function into the future. The addition will include a P.E. Room. This was formerly 6002-59. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $3,900,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type I Addition to Building Project Category !suitability (School too Small) Area (GSF) 18,0001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ~-'Pl $0 I $3,900,000 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I 68 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-032 -Amboy Elementary Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 -Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures, and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was forrnerty 6002-132 Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $244,3701 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 35,3001 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol $244,3701 sol sol 69 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-033 - Amboy Elementary Exterior Improvements School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need to be improved with modem systems. The exterior doors and hardware need to be improved for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002- 131. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/01/2010 Planned Total Cost $166,7681 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 34,6401 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $oj $ol $166,7681 $01 $ol $01 $01 $ol sol sol $01 70 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-034 -Amboy Elementary HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. this was formerly 6002-124. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $866,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category ! Condition - Current Area (GSF) 35,3001 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol $ol $866,oool $01 sol $01 $ol $ol sol $01 $ol 71 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-037 - Amboy Elementary Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All parking, drives, walks and pick up areas need to be improved and new areas added for parking and drives with a new drop off area and associated walks. The playfields need to be refurbished. The site lighting and fencing need to be improved for security reasons. The drainage has been a problem for years and improvement would be most appreciated by downstream neighbors. This was formerly 6002-128 ~~~'\"\" Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/01/2010 Planned Total Cost $331,8701 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership .I.A. _c_a_d__e___m____ic _, Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot/ Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Playgrounds/ Playfields Site Lighting Fencing Drainage Area (GSF) 34,6401 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 IIIIVJ~I $01 $331,8701 $01 sol $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 72 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-038 -Amboy Elementary Specialties Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these up-dates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 127. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 07/01/2010 Planned Total Cost $400,7891 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Specialties Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 34,6401 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol S400,7891 sol sol sol sol sol sol 73 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-098 - Amboy Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 - Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the building safety. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current codes. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $150,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I condition - Current Area (GSF) 34,6401 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safely Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $QI $01 $150.0001 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 sol 74 of 352  I. I Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1415-6002-004 -Amboy Elementary Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002050 - 6002 -Amboy Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the sanitary sewer and the domestic water system. Replace faucets and fixtures for improved conservation. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2013 07/01/20141 06/30/2015 Planned Total Cost $130.000 I Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation jPlumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 34,6401 Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $130,0001 75 of 352 e   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-002 - Argenta Academy Site Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: l 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The drive, walks, parking, and drop off need improved by completely redoing them. The retaining walls all need improved by replacing them. A play area is needed. Site lighting and fencing is in dire need of improvement. Drainage must be considered as walls, drives, and walks are improved. This was formerly 6002- 268. ~w:, --\"~\"----- Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 12/12/2012 Planned Total Cost $408,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type l General Renovation Project Category l Condition - Current Site Systems Parking Lot / Drives Walkways, Drop Areas Playgrounds/ Playfields Site Lighting Fencing Drainage Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 November 26, 2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 p~ol $0 I $01 $01 $408,0001 $01 $0 I so 1 $01 $01 $0 I 76 of 352 e   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1112-6002-027 - Argenta Fire and Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the building safety at Argenta. It will include a fire alarm, security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-357. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2010 07/01/20111 06/30/2012 Planned Total Cost $38,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Fire / Life Safety Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 ~I sol sol sol S38.oool sol sol sol sol sol sol 77 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-001 -Argenta Academy Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system, and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-360. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $148.ooo 1 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type !General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $148,0001 78 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-002 -Argenta Academy Roofing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The roofing contains asbestos and has flashing problems where the original building and the addition meet as well as will have a multitude of penetarations from the installation of the new HVAC so needs improving. This was formerly 6002-361. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $326,6881 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Roofing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 79 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. ! Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-010 -Argenta Academy Specialities Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/marl\u0026lt;boards, the built-ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all needs improved. To be equitable to other schools these updates are necessary. This was formerly 6002-362. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $28,oooi Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Specialties Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 sol $01 $01 sol sol sol $01 $2s,oool $01 soj 80 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. [ Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-022 -Argenta Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the lights for energy savings and improve the distribution and capacity for availability. Also improve the emergency lighting. This was formerly 6002-355. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $105.ooo I Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 81 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. ! Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 11516-6002-023 - Argenta Exterior School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve the exterior walls by replacing the walls as necessary, waterproofing and tuckpointing the brick, and improving the windows with energy savings ones. Replace the exterior doors and hardware with safe and accessible entries. This was formerly 6002-356. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $164,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 sol sol $164,0001 82 of 352   Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-050 - Argenta Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002051 - 6002 - Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior of Argenta by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-359. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $251,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF} 27,2241 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $251,0001 83 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-077 -Argenta Academy HVAC Improvements School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002051 - 6002 -Argenta Academy Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This will include new ceilings and lights. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $600,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 27,2241 Planning Year Created Changed 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 sol $01 $01 $600.0001 84 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-016- Belwood Elementary Fire \u0026amp; Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the building safety. It will include a fire alarm. security system and closed circuit TV system that meets current code. This was formerly 6002-394. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $84,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,2541 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $64,0001 85 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1213-6002-008 - Belwood Elementary HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC. The new HVAC system will control humidity as well as supply outside air required by code to the instructional areas. The system will be engineered to provide occupant comfort in extreme cold or hot temperatures. This will include new ceilings and lights. This was formerly 6002-687. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2011 07/01/20121 06/30/2013 Planned Total Cost $560,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 soj sol soj sol sol ssso,ooo! sol sol soj sol sol 86 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-011 - Belwood Elementary Electrical Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002053 - 6002- Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the electrical service by improving the electrical service, improving the distribution system, replacing or upgrading fixtures with modem efficient fixtures and provide for emergencies from loss of service. This was formerly 6002-396. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $257,oool Funding Code Facility Type l Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,2541 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Electrical Lighting Electrical Distribution Electrical Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $257,0001 $01 87 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-012 - Belwood Elementary Exterior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior asbestos and steel windows need improvement with modem systems. The exterior doors and hardware need improvement for safety and ADA concerns. This was formerly 6002-395. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $139,0ool Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,2541 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 :01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $139,0001 $01 $01 88 of 352 Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007  6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I:, ,,~~'Fi\" : _ _. i.'  ' . .. .. Capital Project Detail I Project Number \u0026amp; Name: Project Type 1516-6002-073 - Belwood Elementary Site Improvement I I General Renovation I School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: Project Category 16002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School I I Condition - Current I Building Number and Name: Site Systems - Parking Lot/ Drives Project Scope: Walkways, Drop Areas All parking, drives, walks and pick up areas need to be improved Playgrounds/ Playfields and new areas added for parking and drives with a new drop off Site Lighting area and associated walks. The playfields need to be furbished. The site lighting and fencing needs to be improved for security Fencing reasons. The drainage has been a problem for years and Drainage improvement would be most appreciated by downstream neighbors. This was formerly 6002-391. ~~~,,,, .._,....,,,.\n,uuvuv, Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status Area (GSF) I 07/01/2014 I 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 I Planned I 17,2541 Total Cost I $114,ooo I Planning Year Funding Code Facility Type Created Changed I Partnership I I Academic I I 2007 I 2008 I  Expected Annual Cost for this Project 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 1~~, $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $114,0001 $01 $01  89 of 352    Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-074 - Belwood Elementary Specialities Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: All the chalk/markboards, the built ins, and the stage date to 1972 or before and all need to be improved. To be equitable to other schools these updates are necessary. This was formerly 6002- 390. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $94,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation I Specialties Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,2541 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 lllffl$l6 1 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $94,0001 $01 $01 90 of 352  .}  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-075 - Belwood Elementary Plumbing Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: I 6002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: Improve sanitary sewer, domestic water system and faucets and fixtures. This was formerly 6002-392. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $53,oool Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation !Plumbing Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 17,2541 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $53.0001 91 of 352  f\n Capital Projects - Planned November 26, 2007 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. I Capital Project Detail Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 1516-6002-080 - Belwood Elementary Interior Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002053 - 6002 - Belwood Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the interior of Belwood Elementary by installing new VCT, hard flooring and carpet, repairing and painting walls, new ceilings system and tile, and new doors and hardware. This was formerly 6002-389. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2014 07/01/20151 06/30/2016 Planned Total Cost $221,0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF} 17,2541 Building Systems Interior Floors Interior Walls Interior Ceilings Interior Other Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $01 $221,0001 $01 $01 92 of 352  .}  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-017 - Boone Park Elementary Exterior Improvements School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 16002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: The exterior walls need improved with waterproofing and tuckpointing. The exterior doors and hardware need improved for ADA and function. This was formerly 6002-228. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/01/2010 Planned Total Cost $164,3041 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) 42,7491 November 26, 2007 Building Systems Exterior Walls Exterior Doors Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 $164,3041 93 of 352 -  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-022 - Boone Park HVAC Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project is to improve the HVAC system and add fresh air to this location. This projet will also include roof improvement, ceiling improvement, and lighting improvement projects required due to the effects of the demolition necessary for this project. This was formerly 6002-37 and 6002-50. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01 /20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $2.600.0001 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership I Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project November 26, 2007 I Project Type Building Systems I General Renovation IHVAC Project Category j Condition - Current Area (GSF) 42,7491 Planning Year Created Changed 2007 2008 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 so 1 $2.600,0001 sol sol 94 of 352  --  Capital Projects - Planned 6002000 - North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Project Number \u0026amp; Name: 0910-6002-048 - Boone Park Elementary Fire And Safety Improvement School Number, Name \u0026amp; Type: 6002054 - 6002 - Boone Park Elementary School Building Number and Name: Project Scope: This project will improve the building safety at Boone Park Elementary. It will include a fire alarm system $249439, security alarm system $23527, closed circuit TV system $40004, and kitchen suppression sytem $30457 that meets current code. These total $343,427. This was formerly project number 6002-227. Design Construction Start Date Start Date Comp. Date Status 07/01/2008 07/01/20091 06/30/2010 Planned Total Cost $343,4271 Funding Code Facility Type I Partnership !Academic Expected Annual Cost for this Project Project Type I General Renovation Project Category I Condition - Current Area (GSF) November 26, 2007 Building Systems Fire / Life Safety Life Safety Plann\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_835","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2007-07/2007-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/835"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nBOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA RECEI ED JUL 1 7 2007 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO RING ass North Little Rock School District Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:00 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Wednesday, July 18, 2007 -5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Trent Cox, President II. INVOCATION, Letitia Martin, Director of Federal Programs and Assessment III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Trent Cox, President Scott Teague, Vice President Marty Moore, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Darrell Montgomery, Member Margo Tenner, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Summer Quest Video - L. Harrison B. 2006 - 2007 NLRHS IB/ AP Students - L. Harrison VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, June 21, 2007 5:30 P.M. (Regular)- Page A-1 - VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None Page 2 - Board Agenda July 18, 2007 VIII. AC1JON ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. B. C. D. E. F. Consider Arkansas School Boards Association Membership - K. Kirspel - Page B - l Consider Athletic Admission Price Increase - K. Danaher - Page C - 1 Consider Revisions of Student Board Policies: - B. Acklin - Page D- l Consider Salary Schedule Revisions - K. Kirspel - Page E - l Consider Student Handbook Revisions - F. Jackson Consider 2008 - 2009 Proposed Budget of Expenditures - K. Kirspel - Page F- 1 G. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - l 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - l 3. Consider bid items - Page R - l 4. Consider building use requests - Page S - 1 5. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - l IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Next Board (Regular) Meeting -Thursday, August 16, 2007 5:00 P.M. XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES June 21, 2007 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, June 21, 2007 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. There were no public comments. President Trent Cox called the meeting to order at 5 :00 p.m. Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Trent Cox, President Scott Teague, Vice President Marty Moore, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Margo Tenner, Member Darrell Montgomery, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDr. Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS There were none. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the minutes of the May 17, 2007 (Regular) meeting as printed. Scott Teague seconded the motion. A-1 YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Margie Snider, Certified Personnel Policies Chairperson, presented the Certified Personnel Policies Committee report. The first proposal was to revise Board Policy CDI Tuition Reimbursement for Teachers as follows: The second sentence under Item 2 changed from: \"Tuition reimbursement will be granted to applicants based on the order in which they are received in the District Personnel Office as long as total budgeted monies have not been expended.\" To: \"Tuition reimbursement will be granted to applicants whose applications have been received in the District Personnel Office according to the deadlines outlined in item 6 below, as long as total budgeted monies have not been expended.\" Item 7 from: \"The maximum total financial reimbursement granted in a contract year shall be twenty two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500).\" To: \"The maximum total financial reimbursement granted in a contract year shall be thirty-one thousand one hundred ten dollars ($31,110). MOTION Marty Moore moved to accept the revisions of Board Policy CDI Tuition Reimbursement for Teachers as proposed by the Certified Personnel Policies Committee. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None Mrs. Snider stated the Certified Personnel Policies Committee approved the Extra Compensation Review Committee's recommendation to add stipends to Quiz Bowl sponsors and the Poplar Street Middle Department Chairs but rejected the recommendation to increase the contract days for the Head Varsity Basketball Coaches. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the approval for the Quiz Bowl sponsors of $500 for middle school and $700 high school and $900 stipends for the Poplar Street Middle School Department Chairs. Margo Tenner seconded the motion. A-2 YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None Marty Moore moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to increase the contract days of the Head Varsity Basketball Coaches from 217 to 240. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Teague, Tenner and Williams Riley Mrs. Snider also presented a proposal to revise Board Policy 3.6 Certified Personnel Employee Training to remove the second sentence under PD Documentation. This sentence is: \"Failure of an employee to receive sixty (60) hours of professional development in any given year may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination.\" MOTION John Riley moved to reject the Certified Personnel Policies Committee proposal to remove the sentence: \"Failure of an employee to receive sixty (60) hours of professional development in any given year may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination.\" from the PD Documentation portion of Board Policy 3.6 Certified Personnel Employee Training. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None 2007 - 2008 School Calendar Revision Mr. Kirspel recommended the school calendar revision of the two (2) half ( 1/2) work days of August 17, 2007 and June 2, 2008 changed to full days which would increase the teachers days from 190 to 191. This revision will not affect the student days. MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to increase the one-half work days on August the 17, 2007 and June 2, 2008 to full days in the 2007 - 2008 school calendar. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None Revisions to Board Policies 4.42 Student Handbook and 4.47 (4.28A) Cell Phones, Beepers, etc. Mr. Kirspel explained these were two policy revisions Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation, had presented at the Board Workshop and the changes were printed in their agendas. A-3 MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to revise Board Policy 4.28-A Cell Phones and Communication Devices to 4.47 Possession and Use of Cell Phone, Beepers, etc as presented and printed in the agenda. Margo Tenner seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Cox, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams Moore Margo Tenner moved to accept the Administration's recommendation to revise Board Policy 4.42 Student Handbook as presented and printed in the agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel recommended the Board accept the information on pages O - 1 through T -24 as printed in the agenda. MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the consent agenda as printed in the agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA MOTION Scott Teague moved to change the Thursday, July 19, 2007 regular Board Meeting to Wednesday, July 18, 2007. Margo Tenner seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Mr. Kirspel pointed out the two letters printed in the agenda. The first one was from Dr. Ken James, Arkansas Department of Education Commissioner, recognizing our District for being named a winner of a SchoolMatch's \"What Parents Want\" Award. The second one was a letter concerning electric meter rate schedules from Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services thanking Board member John Riley in helping the district save approximately $40,000 annually. A-4 Mr. Kirspel also highlighted items from the June 16, 2007 Board Workshop including the K- 12 Curriculum information provided by Dr. Angela Olsen. He also talked about the district's desegregation attorney, Steve Jones confirming with the Board to file for unitary status within the next year. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Margo Tenner moved to adjourn the meeting. Marty Moore seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, Tenner and Williams None President Cox declared the meeting adjourned at 6: 17 p.m. Trent Cox, President Marty Moore, Secretary A-5 ansas School Boards Association 808 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive  Little Rock, AR 72202-3646 (501) 372-1415  Fax (501) 375-2454  1-800-482-1212  www.arsba.org MEMORANDUM July 2, 2007 TO: All Superintendents, Co-op Directors FROM: Amy Daniel, ASBA President \u0026amp; Dan Farley, Executive Director RE: 2007-08 ASBA Membership ASBA's programs and services are outlined in the enclosed flyer, which has been sent to all members. Membership in ASBA continues to provide an important source of products and services for school boards and school districts. RECEIVED JUL - 5 2007 ASBA is here to serve you, your board, and your school district by providing you with all the help it can to make your work a little bit easier. Our mission is to make the brightest possible future for our children through the education we provide them. Working together as a united force, we can improve our schools and better serve our communities. The ASBA Board of Directors approved the current membership fee schedul.e at its June 8 meeting. Some districts, if they lost students, may see a decrease in their fees\nothers, who gained students, may see a slight increase. The fees area based on the revenues published in the \"Annual Statistical Report of the Public Schools of Arkansas,\" published by the Arkansas Department of Education. The scale consists of 10 brackets and is printed on the enclosed flyer. We look forward to a successful new year of working together to improve the academic achievement and well-being of Arkansas public school students. B - 1 Arkansas School Boards Association 808 Dr. Martin Luther King Drive Little Rock, AR 72202 Telephone: 1-800-482-1212 Bill To North Little Rock School District Kenneth Kirspel, Superintendent P.O. Box 687 North Little Rock, AR 72115 Date Event/Item Description 6/30/2007 Membership Due Upon Receipt Phone# Fax# ASBA Membership Dues 2007-08 E-mail Web Site Kl:.t.\n1:.IVEO JUL - 5 2007 P.O.No.: Qty Total Invoice Date Invoice No. 6/30/2007 5992 EvenVltem ASBA Membership Cost Amount 1 1,903.00 1,903.00 $1,903.00 Payments/Credits $0.00 1-800-482-1212 (501) 375-2454 arsba@arsba.org www.arsba.org Balance Due $1,903.00 B - 2 Class North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street P.O. Box 687  North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115-0687 501.771.8000  www.nlrsd.k12.ar.us July 11, 2007 To: From: Subject: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent Kevin Danaher, Athletic Director Athletic Events Price Increase I would like to recommend the $1.00 increase of adult and student admission for our athletic events beginning with the 2007-2008 school year. On the varsity level for all sports, adult ticket price would remain the same. The $1.00 increase on a student ticket would be $4.00. Admission prices at the middle school level for all athletic events will increase $1.00 also. Adult ticket prices would increase to $4.00 and student ticket to $3.00. This increase keeps North Little Rock School District in line with the other 7 A Central Conference schools. There will be no changes in the current season ticket prices or \"All Sports\" season ticket prices. \"World Class Schools for World Class Students\" An Equal Opportunity Employer C-1 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.4 STUDENT TRANSFERS 4.4----STUDENTT RANSFERS The North Little Rock School District shall review and accept or reject requests for transfers, both into and out of the District, on a case by case basis. Any student transferring from a school accredited by the Department of Education to a school in the District shall be placed into the same grade the student would have been in had the student remained at the former school. Any student transferring from home school or a school that is not accredited by the Department of Education to a District school shall be evaluated by District staff to determine the student's appropriate grade placement. The Board of Education reserves the right, after a hearing before the Board, not to allow any person who has been expelled from another district to enroll as a student until the time of the person's expulsion has expired. The responsibility for transportation of any nonresident student admitted to a school in this District shall be borne by the student or the student's parents. The District and the resident district may enter into a written agreement with the student or student's parents to provide transportation to or from the District, or both. Legal References: AC.A. 6-18-316 AC.A. 6-18-510 AC.A. 6-15-504 (f) State Board of \u0026amp;iucation Standards of Accreditation VII (E) (1) Date Adopted: 6/30/87 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-1 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.4---STUDENT TRANSFERS The North Little Rock School District shall review and accept or reject requests for transfers, both into and out of the District, on a case by case basis. The District may reject a nonresident's application for admission if its acceptance would necessitate the addition of staff or classrooms, exceed the capacity of a program, class, grade level, or school building, or cause the District to provide educational services not currently provided in the affected school. The District shall reject applications that would cause it to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding desegregation. Any student transferring from a school accredited by the Department of Education to a school in the District shall be placed into the same grade the student would have been in had the student remained at the former school. Any student transferring from home school or a school that is not accredited by the Department of Education to a District school shall be evaluated by District staff to determine the student's appropriate grade placement. The Board of Education reserves the right, after a hearing before the Board, not to allow any person who - has been expelled from another district to enroll as a student until the time of the person's expulsion has expired. The responsibility for transportation of any nonresident student admitted to a school in this District shall be borne by the student or the student's parents. The District and the resident district may enter into a written agreement with the student or student's parents to provide transportation to or from the District, or both. Legal References: A.CA 6-18-316 A.C.A.  6-18-510 A.C.A.  6-15-504 (f) State Board of Education Standards of Accreditation VII (E) (1) Date Adopted: 6/30/87 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-2 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 4.5 SCHOOL CHOICE - 4.5--SCHOOL CHOICE The North Little Rock Board will consider all applications for School Choice postmarked not later than the July 1 preceding the fall semester the applicant would begin school in the District. The Board shall notify the parent or guardian and the student's resident district in writing of the Board's decision to accept or reject the application within thirty (30) days of its receipt of the application. The District shall advertise in appropriate print and broadcast media to inform students and parents in adjoining districts of the range of possible openings available under the School Choice Program. The public pronouncements shall state the application deadline and the requirements and procedure for participation in the program. Such pronouncements shall be made in the spring, but in no case later than June first. When considering applications, priority will be given to applications from siblings or stepsiblings residing in the same residence or household of students already attending the District through school choice. The District may reject a nonresident's application for admission if its acceptance would necessitate the addition of staff or classrooms\nexceed the capacity of a program, class, grade level, or school building\nor cause the District to provide educational services not currently provided in the affected school. The District shall reject applications that would cause it to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding desegregation. Letters of rejection shall state the reason(s) for the rejection. The Board of Directors reserves the right, after a hearing before the Board, not to allow any person who is currently under expulsion from another district to enroll in a District school. Students admitted under this policy shall be entitled to continued enrollment until they graduate or are not longer eligible for enrollment in the District's schools. Legal References: AC.A. 6-18-206 AC.A. 6-18-510 Last Revised: l 2/ 18/03 D-3 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.5---SCHOOL CHOICE The North Little R-0ek Board superintendent will consider all applications for School Choice postmarked not later than the July 1 preceding the fall semester the applicant would begin school in the District The Beard superintendent shall notify the parent or guardian and the student's resident district in writing of the Board's decision to accept or reject the application within thirty (30) days ofits receipt of the application. The District shall advertise in appropriate print and broadcast media to inform students and parents in adjoining districts of the range of possible openings available under the School Choice Program. The public pronouncements shall state the application deadline and the requirements and procedure for participation in the program. Such pronouncements shall be made in the spring, but in no case later than June first When considering applications, priority will be given to applications from siblings or stepsiblings residing in the same residence or household of students already attending the District through school choice. The District may reject a nonresident's application for admission if its acceptance would necessitate the addition of staff or classrooms\nexceed the capacity of a program, class, grade level, or school building\nor cause the District to provide educational services not currently provided in the affected school. The District - shall reject applications that would cause it to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding desegregation. Letters of rejection shall state the reason( s) for the rejection. The Board of Directors reserves the right, after a hearing before the Board, not to allow any person who is currently under expulsion from another district to enroll in a District school. Students admitted lll1der this policy shall be entitled to continued enrollment until they graduate or are not longer eligible for enrollment in the District's schools. Any student admitted to this district under the provisions of this policy who chooses to return to his/her resident district during the school year voids the transfer and must reapply for a school choice admission if desiring to return to this district in the future. Legal References: AC.A. 6-18-206 AC.A. 6-18-510 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-4 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.14 STUDENT PUBLICATIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE 4.14-STUDENT PUBLICATIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE Student Publications All publications that are supported financially by the school or by use of school facilities, or are produced in conjunction with a class shall be considered school-sponsored publications. School publications do not provide a forum for public expression. Such publications, as well as the content of studente xpressioni n school-sponsoreda ctivities,s hall be subjectt o the editorialc ontrolo f the District's administration whose actions shall be reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns and adhere to the following limitations: 1. Advertising may be accepted for publications that does not condone or promote products that are inappropriate for the age and maturity of the audience or that endorse such things as tobacco, alcohol, or drugs\n2. Publications may be regulated to prohibit writings which are, in the opinion of the appropriate teacher and/or administrator, ungrammatical, poorly written, inadequately researched, biased or prejudiced,v ulgar or profane,o r unsuitablef or immaturea udiences\n3. Publications may be regulated to refuse to publish material which might reasonably be perceived to advocate drug or alcohol use, irresponsible sex, or conduct otherwise inconsistent with the shared values of a civilized social order, or to associate the school with any position other than neutrality on matterso f politicalc ontroversy\na nd 4. Prohibited publications include: a. Those that are obscene as to minors\nb. Those that are libelous or slanderous, including material containing defamatory falsehoods about public figures or governmental officials, which are made with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard of the truth\nc. Those that constitutea n unwarrantedi nvasiono f privacya s definedb y state law, d. Publicationst hat suggesto r urge the commissiono f unlawfula cts on the schoolp remises\ne. Publicationsw hich suggesto r urge the violationo flawful schoolr egulations\nf. Hate literaturet hat scurrilouslya ttackse thnic,r eligious,o r racialg roups. Student Publications on School Web Pages Student publications displayed on school web pages shall follow the same guidelines as listed. In addition,t hese publicationss hall: 1. Not containa ny non-educationaal dvertisements\nD-5 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.14 STUDENT PUBLICATIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE 2. Not contain any personally identifying information, as defined by ''Directory Infonnation\" in Policy 4.13-PRIV ACY OF STUDENT RECORDS, without the written pennission of the parent of the student or the student if over eighteen (18)\nand 3. State that the views expressed are not necessarily those of the School Board or the employees of the District Nonschool Publications The Superintendent shall review nonschool publications prior to their distribution and will bar from distribution those materials that are obscene, libelous, pervasively indecent, or advertise unlawful products or services. Material may also be barred from distribution if there is evidence that reasonably supports a forecast that disruption will likely result from the distribution. Distribution of Literature The school principal or designee shall establish reasonable regulations governing the time, place, and manner of student distribution ofliterature. The regulations shall: 1. Be narrowly drawn to promote orderly administration of school activities by preventing disruption and may not be designed to stifle expression\n2. Be uniformly applied to all forms ofliterature\n3. Allow no interference with classes or school activities\n4. Specify times and places where distribution may and may not occur\nand 5. Not inhibit a person's right to accept or reject any literature distributed in accordance with the regulations. The Superintendent, along with the student publications advisors, shall develop administrative regulations for the implementation of this policy. The regulations shall include definitions of tenns and timelines for the review of materials. Legal References: A.C.A.  6-18-1202, 1203, \u0026amp; 1204 Tinker v. Des Moines !SD, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) BethelS choolD istrictN o. 403 v. Fraser,4 78 U.S. 675 (1986) HazelwoodS choolD istrictv . Kuhlmeier4, 84 U.S. 260 (1988) Date Adopted: 6/26/86 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-6 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.14-STUDENT PUBLICATIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE Student Publications All publications that are supported financially by the school or by use of school facilities, or are produced in conjunction with a class shall be considered school-sponsored publications. School publications do not provide a forum for public expression. Such publications, as well as the content of studente xpressioni n school-sponsoreda ctivities,s hallb e subjectt o the editorialc ontrolo f the District's administration whose actions shall be reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns and adhere to the following limitations: 1. Advertising may be accepted for publications that does not condone or promote products that are inappropriate for the age and maturity of the audience or that endorse such things as tobacco, alcohol, or drugs\n2. Publications may be regulated to prohibit writings which are, in the opinion of the appropriate teacher and/or administrator, ungrammatical, poorly written, inadequately researched, biased or prejudiced, vulgar or profane, or unsuitable for immature audiences\n3. Publications may be regulated to refuse to publish material which might reasonably be perceived to advocate drug or alcohol use, irresponsible sex, or conduct otherwise inconsistent with the shared values of a civilized social order, or to associate the school with any position other than neutrality on matterso f politicalc ontroversy\na nd 4. Prohibitedp ublicationsi nclude: a Those that are obscene as to minors\nb. Those that are libelous or slanderous, including material containing defamatory falsehoods about public figures or governmental officials, which are made with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard of the truth\nc. Those that constitutea n unwarrantedi nvasiono f privacya s definedb y state law, d. Publications that suggest or urge the commission of unlawful acts on the school premises\ne. Publications which suggest or urge the violation of lawful school regulations\nf. Hate literaturet hat scurrilouslya ttackse thnic,r eligious,o r racialg roups. Student Publications on School Web Pages Student publications displayed on school web pages shall follow the same guidelines as listed. In addition,t hese publicationss hall: 1. Not containa ny non-educationaal dvertisements\nD-7 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED .._ _____DE_L_E_T_IO_N S HAV E BEEN STRUCK THROUGH ___,., A 2. Not contain any personally identifying information, as defined by \"Directory Information\" in Policy 4.13-PRIV ACY OF STIJDENT RECORDS, without the written pennission of the parent of the student or the student if over eighteen (18)\nand 3. State that the views expressed are not necessarily those of the School Board or the employees of the District Student Distribution of Nonschool Literature Publications, and Materials A student or group of students who distribute ten (10) or fewer copies of the same nonschool literature, publications, or materials (hereafter \"nonschool materials\"), shall do so in a time, place, and manner that does not cause a substantial disruption of the orderly education environment A student or group of students wishing to distribute more than ten (10) copies of nonschool materials shall have school authorities review their nonschool materials at least three (3) school days in advance of their desired time of dissemination. The Superintendent shall review the nonschool materials, publieations prior to their distribution and will bar from distribution those nonschool materials that are obscene, libelous, pervasively indecent, or advertise unlawful products or services. Material may also be barred from distribution if there is evidence that reasonably supports a forecast that a substantial disruption of the orderly operation of the school or educational environment will likely result from the distribution. Concerns related to any denial of distribution by the principal shall be heard by the superintendent, who decision shall be final. 4lt Distribution of Litemture The school principal or designee shall establish reasonable regulations governing the time, place, and manner of student distribution of litemture nonschool materials. The regulations shall: 1. Be narrowly drawn to promote orderly administration of school activities by preventing disruption and may not be designed to stifle expression\n2. Be uniformly applied to all forms of nonschool litemture materials\n3. Allow no interference with classes or school activities\n4. Specify times, aoopl aces, and manner where distribution may and may not occur\nand 5. Not inhibit a person's right to accept or reject any literature distributed in accordance with the regulations. 6. Students shall be responsible for the removal of excess literature that is left at the distribution point for more than ten (10) days. D-8 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH The Superintendent, along with the student publications advisors, shall develop administrative regulations for the implementation of this policy. The regulations shall include definitions of terms and timelines for the review of materials. Legal References: AC.A. 6-18-1202, 1203, \u0026amp; 1204 Tinker v. Des Moines !SD, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986) Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988) Date Adopted: 6/26/86 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-9 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.30 SUSPENSION FROM SCHOOL 4.30-SUSPENSION FROM SCHOOL Studentsn ot presenta t schoolc annotb enefitf rom the educationalo pportunitiesth e school environment affords.A dministratorst,h erefore,s hall strive to find ways to keep studentsi n school as participantsi n the educational process. There are instances, however, when the needs of the other students or the interests of the orderly learning environment require the removal of a student from school. The Board authorizess chool principalso r their designeest o suspends tudentsf or discipliruuyr easons for a period of time not to exceed ten (10) school days, including the day upon which the suspension is imposed. The suspensionm ay be in schoolo t out of school.S tudentsa re responsiblef or their conductt hat occurs at any time on the schoolg rounds\no ff school groundsa t a school-sponsoredfu nction,a ctivity,o r event\nand/or going to and from school or a school activity. A student may be suspended for behavior including, but not limited to that which: 1. Is in violation of school policies, rules, or regulations\n2. Substantiallyi nterferesw ith the safe and orderlye ducationale nvironment\n3. School administrators believe will result in the substantial interference with the safe and orderly educationale nvironment\na nd/or 4. Is insubordinatei,n corrigiblev, iolent,o r involvesm oralt urpitude. The school principal or designee shall proceed as follows in deciding whether or not to suspend a student: - 1. The student shall be given written notice or advised orally of the charges against him/her\n2. If the studentd eniest he charges,h e/shes hall be givena n explanationo f the evidencea gainsth im/her and be allowed to present his/her version of the facts\n3. If the principalf inds the studentg uiltyo f the misconduct,h e/shem ay be suspended\na nd 4. The parent( s) or legal guardian( s) of the student shall have the right to appeal a building level decision as outlined in the student handbook. When possible,n otice of the suspension,i ts duration,a nd any stipulationsf or the student's readrnittance to class will be given to the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) prior to the suspension. Such notice shall be handed to the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) or mailed to the last address reflected in the records of the District. Generally, notice and hearing should precede the student's removal from school, but if prior notice and hearing are not feasible, as where the student's presence endangers persons or property or threatens disruption of the academic process, thus justifying immediate removal from school, the necessary notice and hearing should follow as soon as practicable. Out-of-school suspensions shall be treated as unexcused absences and during the period of suspension - studentss hall not be permittedo n campuse xceptt o attenda student/parent/administratcoorn ference. D-10 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.30 SUSPENSION FROM SCHOOL In-school suspension shall be treated as if the student was present at school. If a student is assigned to Student Assignment Classes (SAC) three times during a school year, any subsequent serious misbehavior will result in the student being suspended off campus for a maximum of ten days. The student shall not attend any school-sponsoreda ctivitiesd uring the imposeds uspensionn or shall the student participatei n any school-sponsoreda ctivities.W hile under suspensions tudents shall not be eligible to participatei n, practice for, or attend any student activity whether during or after the school day. These activities include both Vespers and graduation. Suspensionsi nitiatedb y the principalo r his/her designeem ay be appealedt o the Superintendentb, ut not to the Board. Suspensionsi nitiatedb y the Superintendenmt ay be appealedt o the Board. Legal References: AC.A 6-18-507 Goss v Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975) Date Adopted: 9/26/95 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-11 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.30-SUSPENSION FROM SCHOOL Studentsn ot present at school cannot benefitf rom the educationalo pportunitiest he school environment affords. Administrators,t herefore,s hall strive to find ways to keep studentsi n school as participantsi n the educational process. There are instances, however, when the needs of the other students or the interests of the orderly learning environment require the removal of a student from school. The Board authorizess chool principalso r their desi,gneesto suspends tudentsf or disciplinaryr easonsf or a periodo f time not to exceed ten (10) school days, including the day upon which the suspension is imposed. The suspension may be in school or out of school. Students are responsible for their conduct that occurs at any time on the school grounds\no ff school grounds at a school-sponsoredf unction,a ctivity,o r event\nand/or going to and from school or a school activity. A student may be suspended for behavior including, but not limited to that which: 1. Is in violation of school policies, rules, or regulations\n2. Substantiallyi nterferesw ith the safe and orderlye ducationale nvironment\n3. School administrators believe will result in the substantial interference with the safe and orderly educationale nvironment\na nd/or 4. Is insubordinate,i ncorrigiblev, iolent,o r involvesm oral turpitude. The school principal or designee shall proceed as follows in deciding whether or not to suspend a student: 1. The student shall be given written notice or advised orally of the charges against him/her\n2. If the student denies the charges, he/she shall be given an explanation of the evidence against him/her and be allowed to present his/her version of the facts\n3. If the principalf inds the studentg uiltyo f the misconduct,h e/shem ay be suspended\na nd 4. The parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of the student shall have the right to appeal a building level decision as outlined in the student handbook. When possible,n otice of the suspension,i ts duration,a nd any stipulationsf or the student's readrnittance to class will be given to the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) prior to the suspension. Such notice shall be handed to the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) or mailed to the last address reflected in the records of the District. Generally, notice and hearing should precede the student's removal from school, but if prior notice and hearing are not feasible, as where the student's presence endangers persons or property or threatens disruption of the academic process, thus justifying immediate removal from school, the necessary notice and hearing should follow as soon as practicable. - D-12 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH It is the parents' or legal guardians' responsibility to provide current contact information to the district which the school shall use to immediately notify the parent or legal guardian upon the suspension of a student The notification shall be by one of the following means, listed in order of priority:  A primary call number o The contact may be by voice, voice mail, or text message  An email address  A regular first class letter to the last know mailing address The district shall keep a log of contacts attempted and made to the parent or legal guardian. Out-of-school suspensions shall be treated as unexcused absences and during the period of suspension students shall not be permitted on campus except to attend a student/parent/administrator conference. In-school suspension shall be treated as if the student was present at school. If a student is assigned to Student Assignment Classes (SAC) three times during a school year, any subsequent serious misbehavior will result in the student being suspended off campus for a maximum of ten days. The student shall not attend any school-sponsored activities during the imposed suspension nor shall the student participate in any school-sponsored activities. While under suspension students shall not be eligible to participate in, practice for, or attend any student activity whether during or after the school day. These activities include both Vespers and graduation. Suspensions initiated by the principal or his/her designee may be appealed to the Superintendent, but not to the Board. Suspensions initiated by the Superintendent may be appealed to the Board. Legal References: A.C.A.  6-18-507 Goss v Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975) Date Adopted: 9/26/95 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-13 CURRENT BOARD POLICY - 4.37 EMERGENCY DRILLS 4.37-EMERGENCY DRILLS All schools in the District shall conduct fire drills at least monthly. Tornado drills shall also be conducted at least annually. Other types of emergency drills may also be conducted. These may include, but are not limited to: 1. Earthquake\n2. Act of terrorism\n3. Chemical spill\nand/or 4. Airplane crash. Legal Reference: A.C.A.  12-13-109 Date Adopted: 6/26/86 Last Revised: 12/18/03 D-14 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.37-EMERGENCY DRILLS All schools in the District shall conduct fire drills at least monthly. Tornado drills shall also be conducted at least anraially not fewer than four (4) times per year with at least one each in the months of September, October, January, and February. Students who ride school buses, shall also participate in emergency evacuation drills at least twice each school year. Other types of emergency drills may also be conducted. These may include, but are not limited to: 1. Earthquake\n2. Act of terrorism\n3. Chemical spill\nand/or 4. Airplane crash. Legal Reference: Date Adopted: 6/26/86 Last Revised: 12/18/03 AC.A. 12-13-109 A.CA. 6-10-121 Ark. Divisiono f AcademicF acilitiesa nd TransportationR ules Governing Maintenancea nd Operationso f Ark. PublicS choolB uses and Physical Examinationso f SchoolB us Drivers4 .03.l D-15 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 4.43 BULL YING 4.43-BULL YING Respect for the dignity of others is a cornerstone of civil society. Bullying creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, robs a person of their dignity, detracts from the safe environment necessary to promote student learning, and will not be tolerated by the Board of Directors. Students who bully another person shall be held accountable for their actions whether it occurs on the school grounds\noff school grounds at a school sponsored or approved function, activity, or event\nor going to or from school or a school activity in a school vehicle or school bus\nor at designated school bus stops. Definition: Bullying is any pattern of behavior by a student, or a group of students, that is intended to harass, intimidate, ridicule, humiliate, or instill fear in another child or group of children. Bullying behavior can be a threat of, or actual, physical harm or it can be verbal abuse of the child. Bullying also includes unacceptable behavior identified in this policy which is electronically transmitted. Bullying is a series of recurring actions committed over a period of time directed toward one student, or successive, separate actions directed against multiple students. Examples of \"bullying\" may include but are not limited to a pattern of behavior involving one or more of the following: 1. Sarcastic \"compliments\" about another student's personal appearance\n2. Pointed questions intended to embarrass or humiliate\n3. Mocking, taunting or belittling\n4. Non-verbal threats and/or intimidation such as \"fronting\" or \"chesting\" a person\n5. Demeaning humor relating to a student's race, gender, ethnicity or personal characteristics\n6. Blackmail, extortion, demands for protection money or other involuntary donations or loans\n7. Blocking access to school property or facilities\n8. Deliberate physical contact or injury to person or property\n9. Stealing or hiding books or belongings\nand/or 10. Threats of harm to student( s ), possessions, or others. D-16 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 4.43 BULLYING Students are encouraged to report behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, to their teacher or the building principal. The report may be made anonymously. Teachers and other school employees who have witnessed, or are reliably infonned that, a student has been a victim of behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, shall report the incident(s) to the principal. Parents or legal guardians may submit to the principal written reports of incidents they feel constitute bullying, or if allowed to continue would constitute bullying. The principal shall be responsible for investigatingt he incident(s ) to determine if disciplinarya ction is warranted. The person or persons reporting behavior they consider to be bullying shall not be subject to retaliation or reprisal in any fonn. Students found to be in violation of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. In determining the appropriate disciplinary action, consideration may be given to other violations of the student handbook which may have simultaneously occurred. Notice of what constitutes bullying, the District's prohibition against bullying, and the consequences for students who bully shall be conspicuously posted in every classroom, cafeteria, restroom, gymnasium, auditorium, and school bus. Parents, students, school volunteers, and employees shall be given copies of the notice. Copies of this policy shall be available upon request. Legal Reference: A.C.A.  6-18-514 Last Revised: 1/18/07 D-17 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 4.43-BULL YING Respect for the dignity of others is a cornerstone of civil society. Bullying creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, robs a person of theif his/her dignity, detracts from the safe environment necessary to promote student learning, and will not be tolerated by the Board of Directors. Students\nwho bully another person shall be held accountable for their actions whether it occurs on the school equipment or property grounds\noff school grol:lfl:dsp roperty at a school sponsored or approved function, activity, or event\nor going to or from school or a school activity in a school vehicle or school bus\nor at designated school bus stops. Definition~: Bullying is any pattern of behavior by a st1:1dento,r a group of students, that is intended to harass, intimidate, ridic1:1leh, Uffiiliate,o r instill fear in aaother child or group of children. Bullying behavior eaa be a threat of, or aetua-1p, hysical harm or it eaa be 'rerbal ab1:1soef the child. Bullying also incl1:1deus nacceptable behavior identified in this polic~' which is electronically traasmitted. B1:1llyingis a series of rec1:1rringa etions coHlffl:ittedo ver a period of time directed tmvard one srudent, or suceessh'e, separate actions directed against multiple srudents. Bullying means the intentional harassment, intimidation, humiliation, ridicule, defamation, or threat or incitement of violence by a student against another student or public school employee by a written, verbal, electronic, or physical act that causes or creates a clear and present danger of:  Physical harm to a public school employee or student or damage to the public school employee's or student's property\n Substantial interference with a student's education or with a public school employee's role in education\n A hostile educational environment for one (1) or more students or public school employees due to the severity, persistence, or pervasiveness of the act\nor  Substantial disruption of the orderly operation of the school or educational environment\nElectronic act means without limitation a communication or image transmitted by means of an electronic device, including without limitation a telephone, wireless phone or other wireless communications device, computer, or pager that results in the substantial disruption of the orderly operation of the school or educational environment. Electronic acts of bullying are prohibited whether or not the electronic act originated on school property or with school equipment, if the electronic act is directed specifically at students or school personnel and maliciously intended for D-18 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH the purpose of disrupting school, and has a high likelihood of succeeding in that purpose\nHarassment means a pattern of unwelcome verbal or physical conduct relating to another person's constitutionally or statutorily protected status that causes, or reasonably should be expected to cause, substantial interference with the other's performance in the school environment\nand Substantial disruption means without limitation that any one or more of the following occur as a result of the bullying:  Necessary cessation of instruction or educational activities\n Inability of students or educational staff to focus on learning or function as an educational unit because of a hostile environment\n Severe or repetitive disciplinary measures are needed in the classroom or during educational activities\nor  Exhibition of other behaviors by students or educational staff that substantially interfere with the learning environment. Examples of \"bullying\" may include but are not limited to a pattern of behavior involving one or more of the following: l. Sarcastic \"compliments\" about another student's personal appearance\n2. Pointed questions intended to embarrass or humiliate\n3. Mocking, taunting or belittling\n4. Non-verbal threats and/or intimidation such as \"fronting\" or \"chesting\" a person\n5. Demeaning humor relating to a student's race, gender, ethnicity or personal characteristics\n6. Blackmail, extortion, demands for protection money or other involuntary donations or loans\n7. Blocking access to school property or facilities\n8. Deliberate physical contact or injury to person or property\n9. Stealing or hiding books or belongings\nand/or D-19 PROPOSED BOARD POLICY - July 18, 2007 ADDITIONS HA VE BEEN UNDERLINED DELETIONS HA VE BEEN STRUCK THROUGH 10. Threats of harm to student(s), possessions, or others. Students are encouraged to report behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, to their teacher or the building principal. The report may be made anonymously. Teachers and other school employees who have witnessed, or are reliably informed that, a student has been a victim of behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, shall report the incident(s) to the principal. Parents or legal guardians may submit to the principal written reports of incidents they feel constitute bullying, or if allowed to continue would constitute bullying. The principal shall be responsible for investigating the incident(s) to determine if disciplinary action is warranted. The person or persons reporting behavior they consider to be bullying shall not be subject to retaliation or reprisal in any form. Students found to be in violation of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. In determining the appropriate disciplinary action, consideration may be given to other violations of the student handbook which may have simultaneously occurred. Notice of what constitutes bullying, the District's prohibition against bullying, and the A consequences for students who bully shall be conspicuously posted in every classroom, W cafeteria, restroom, gymnasium, auditorium, and school bus. Parents, students, school volunteers, and employees shall be given copies of the notice. Copies of this policy shall be available upon request. Legal Reference: A.C.A.  6-18-514 Last Revised: 1/18/07 D-20 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District PROPOSED Teacher/Administrator Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8TC I II m IV V 191 Days BA BA+12 BA+24 MA MA+15 01 31,900 32,905 33,910 34,915 35,920 02 32,905 33,910 34,915 35,920 36,925 03 33,910 34,915 35,920 36,925 37,930 04 34,915 35,920 36,925 37,930 38,935 05 35,920 36,925 37,930 38,935 39,940 06 36,925 37,930 38,935 39,940 40,945 07 37,930 38,935 39,940 40,945 '41,950 08 38,935 39,940 40,945 41,950 42,955 09 39,940 40,945 41,950 42,955 43,960 10 40,945 41,950 42,955 43,960 44,965 11 41,950 42,955 43,960 44,965 45,970 12 42,955 43,960 44,965 45,970 46,975 13 43,960 44,965 45,970 46,975 47,980 14 44,965 45,970 46,975 47,980 48,985 15 45,970 46,975 47,980 48,985 49,990 16 46,975 47,980 48,985 49,990 50,995 17 47,980 48,985 49,990 50,995 52,000 18 48,985 49,990 50,995 52,000 53,005 19 49,990 50,995 52,000 53,005 54,010 20 55,015 21 22 Stipends: Paid according to Policy CFEB Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28. 16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E - 1 VI VII vm IX MA+30 MA+45 Spec Doct 36,925 37,930 38,935 39,940 37,930 38,935 39,940 40,945 38,935 39,940 40,945 41,950 39,940 40,945 41,950 42,955 40,945 41,950 42,955 43,960 41,950 42,955 43,960 44,965 42,955 43,960 44,965 45,970 43,960 44,965 45,970 46,975 44,965 45,970 46,975 47,980 45,970 46,975 47,980 48,985 46,975 47,980 48,985 49,990 47,980 48,985 49,990 50,995 48,985 49,990 50,995 52,000 49,990 50,995 52,000 53,005 50,995 52,000 53,005 54,010 52,000 53,005 54,010 55,015 53,005 54,010 55,015 56,020 54,010 55,015 56,020 57,025 55,015 56,020 57,025 58,030 56,020 57,025 58,030 59,035 57,025 58,030 59,035 60,040 59,035 60,040 61,045 ADMINISTRATORS POSITION INCREMENTS (% of lane IV Step 01) Administrative Asst 12% Asst. Prine. (MS \u0026amp; Elem) 14% Asst. Sr. High Principal 16% Elementary Principal 19% Jr. High Principal 20% Coordinator 20% Supervisor 20% Sr. High Principal 27% Director 27% Administrative Director 33% Asst. Superintendent 39% Steps are based on previous experience I II 190 Days BA BA+12 0 31,110 32,110 1 32,110 33,110 2 33,110 34,110 3 34,110 35,110 4 35,110 36,110 5 36,110 37,110 6 37,110 38,110 7 38,110 39,110 8 39,110 40,110 9 40,110 41,110 10 41,110 42,110 11 42,110 43,110 12 43,110 44,110 13 44,110 45,110 14 45,110 46,110 15 46,110 47,110 16 47,110 48,110 17 48,110 49,110 18 49,110 50,110 19 20 21 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Teacher Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule: 7TC Ill IV V VI VII BA+24 MA MA+15 MA+30 MA+45 33,110 34,110 35,110 36,110 37,110 34,110 35,110 36,110 37,110 38,110 35,110 36,110 37,110 38,110 39,110 36,110 37,110 38,110 39,110 40,110 37,110 38,110 39,110 40,110 41,110 38,110 39,110 40,110 41,110 42,110 39,110 40,110 41,110 42,110 43,110 40,110 41,110 42,110 43,110 44,110 41,110 42,110 43,110 44,110 45,110 42,110 43,110 44,110 45,110 46,110 43,110 44,110 45,110 46,110 47,110 44,110 45,110 46,110 47,110 48,110 45,110 46,110 47,110 48,110 49,110 46,110 47,110 48,110 49,110 50,110 47,110 48,110 49,110 50,110 51,110 48,110 49,110 50,110 51,110 52,110 49,110 50,110 51,110 52,110 53,110 50,110 51,110 52,110 53,110 54,110 51,110 52,110 53,110 54,110 55,110 54,110 55,110 56,110 56,110 57,110 58,110 Fringe Benefits include: $264. 78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Stipends: Flat amount according to stipend schedule Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E-2 VIII IX Spec Doct 38,110 39,110 39,110 40,110 40,110 41,110 41,110 42,110 42,110 43,110 43,110 44,110 44,110 45,110 45,110 46,110 46,110 47,110 47,110 48,110 48,110 49,110 49,110 50,110 50,110 51,110 51,110 52,110 52,110 53,110 53,110 54,110 54,110 55,110 55,110 56,110 56,110 57,110 57,110 58,110 58,110 59,110 59,110 60,110 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Licensed Administrator Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule: 7 AD Schedule Based on 207 Days I II Ill IV V VI 207 Davs MA MA+15 MA+30 MA+45 Soec Doct 0 37,794 40,349 42,904 44,182 45,460 48,015 1 39,119 41,674 44,229 45,507 46,785 49,340 2 40,444 42,999 45,554 46,832 48,110 50,665 3 41,769 44,324 46,879 48,157 49,435 51,990 4 43,094 45,649 48,204 49,482 50,760 53,315 5 44,419 46,974 49,529 50,807 52,085 54,640 6 45,744 48,299 50,854 52,132 53,410 55,965 7 47,069 49,624 52,179 53,457 54,735 57,290 8 48,394 50,949 53,504 54,782 56,060 58,615 9 49,719 52,274 54,829 56,107 57,385 59,940 10 51,044 53,599 56,154 57,432 58,710 61,265 11 54,924 57,479 58,757 60,035 62,590 12 58,804 60,082 61,360 63,915 13 62,685 65,240 14 66,565 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance covera POSITION INCREMENTS OTHER INCREMENTS I .f (% of base salary) Elementary principals are to receive an additional increment Administrative Asst 8% based on school enrollment ($1 per student in ADM based on Asst. Prine. (MS \u0026amp; 10% previous year's third nine 9 weeks report.) Asst. Sr. High Principal 12% Asst. Prin and Adm. Asst. are to receive an additional Elementary Principal 15% increment based on school enrollment (.50 per student based Jr. High Principal 16% on previous year's third 9 weeks report.) Coordinator 16% Supervisor 16% Sr. High Principal 23% Director 23% Administrative Director 29% Asst. Superintendent 35% Steps are based on previous experience Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E-3 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Nurses Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8Nl/8N2 8Nl 8N2 I n I II 193 Days 193 Days 200 Days 200 Days Nurse Nurse+MA Nurse Supvr Nurse Supvr+MA 01 32,304 33,304 34,010 35,010 02 33,174 34,174 34,925 35,925 03 34,044 35,044 35,840 36,840 04 34,914 35,914 36,755 37,755 05 35,784 36,784 37,670 38,670 06 36,654 37,654 38,585 39,585 07 37,524 38,524 39,500 40,500 08 38,394 39,394 40,415 41,415 09 39,264 40,264 41,330 42,330 10 40,134 41,134 42,245 43,245 11 41,004 42,004 43,160 44,160 12 41,874 42,874 44,075 45,075 13 42,744 43,744 44,990 45,990 14 43,614 44,614 45,905 46,905 15 44,484 45,484 46,820 47,820 16 45,354 46,354 47,735 48,735 17 46,224 47,224 48,650 49,650 18 47,094 48,094 49,565 50,565 19 47,964 48,964 50,480 51,480 20 48,834 49,834 51,395 52,395 21 49,704 50,704 52,310 53,310 I-Nurse Registered Nurse I-Nurse Supvr Supervisor Registered Nurses II-Nurse Registered Nurse II-Nurse Supvr Supervisor Registered with Masters Nurses with Masters Degree in Nursing in Nursing Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for$ I 6,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E-4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Fringe Benefits include: CURRENT North Little Rock School District Nurse Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule: 7NU I II Ill 193 Davs 193 Davs 200 Davs Nurse Nurse+MA Nurse Supvr 31,671 32 671 33,343 32 541 33,541 34,258 33 411 34,411 35,173 34,281 35,281 36,088 35,151 36,151 37,003 36,021 37,021 37,918 36,891 37,891 38,833 37,761 38,761 39,748 38,631 39 631 40,663 39,501 40,501 41,578 40,371 41,371 42,493 41,241 42,241 43,408 42 111 43,111 44,323 42,981 43,981 45,238 43 851 44,851 46,153 44 721 45,721 47,068 45,591 46 591 47,983 46,461 47,461 48,898 47,331 48,331 49,813 48,201 49,201 50,728 49,071 50,071 51,643 IV 200 Davs Nurse Supvr+MA 34,343 35,258 36,173 37,088 38,003 38,918 39,833 40,748 41,663 42,578 43,493 44,408 45,323 46,238 47,153 48,068 48,983 49,898 50,813 51,728 52,643 $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual ciental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Board adopted: November 16, 2006 E - 5 r PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Physical/Occupation Therapists Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8PO 191 Day Schedule OT/PT Step I 01 43,299 02 44,399 03 45,499 04 46,599 05 47,699 06 48,799 07 49,899 08 50,999 09 52,099 10 53,199 11 54,299 12 55,399 13 56,499 14 57,599 15 58,699 16 59,799 17 60,899 18 61,999 19 63,099 20 64,199 21 65,299 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $ 10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E- 6 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Physical/Occupational Therapists Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule: 7PO I 190 Day OT/PT 0 42,228 1 43,328 2 44,428 3 45,528 4 46,628 5 47,728 6 48,828 7 49,928 8 51,028 9 52,128 10 53,228 11 54,328 12 55,428 13 56,528 14 57,628 15 58,728 16 59,828 17 60,928 18 62,028 19 63,128 20 64,228 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Board adopted: November 16, 2006 E -7 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Non-Licensed Professionals Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8Pl Schedule Based on 191 Days Non-Lie Prof-Other Non-Lie Coord Non-Lie Dir Non-Lie Adm Dir CFO/CIO Step I II m N V 01 30,331 40,866 44,001 49,440 56,278 02 31,336 41,871 45,006 50,445 57,283 03 32,341 42,876 46,011 51,450 58,288 04 33,346 43,881 47,016 52,455 59,293 05 34,351 44,886 48,021 53,460 60,298 06 35,356 45,891 49,026 54,465 61,303 07 36,361 46,896 50,031 55,470 62,308 08 37,366 47,901 51,036 56,475 63,313 09 38,371 48,906 52,041 57,480 64,318 10 39,376 49,911 53,046 58,485 65,323 11 40,381 50,916 54,051 59,490 66,328 12 41,386 51,921 55,056 60,495 67,333 13 42,391 52,926 56,061 61,500 68,338 14 43,396 53,931 57,066 62,505 69,343 15 44,401 54,936 58,071 63,510 70,348 16 45,406 55,941 59,076 64,515 71,353 17 46,411 56,946 60,081 65,520 72,358 18 47,416 57,951 61,086 66,525 73,363 19 48,421 58,956 62,091 67,530 74,368 20 49,426 59,961 63,096 68,535 75,373 21 50,431 60,966 64,101 69,540 76,378 Currently - Prof/Other includes: Communication Specialist, Parent Liaison/Homeless, Parent Involvement and VIPS, and Clinical Counselors Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E-8 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Non-Licensed Professionals Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule : 7PT1 Schedule based on 190 days I II Ill IV V Non-Lie Adm Non-Lie Prof-Other Non-Lie Coord Non-Lie Dir Dir CFO/CIO 0 29,580 39,855 42,913 48,217 54,885 1 30,580 40,855 43,913 49,217 55,885 2 31,580 41,855 44,913 50,217 56,885 3 32,580 42,855 45,913 51,217 57,885 4 33,580 43,848 46,913 52,217 58,885 5 34,580 44,855 47,913 53,217 59,885 6 35,580 45,855 48,913 54,217 60,885 7 36,580 46,855 49,913 55,217 61,885 8 37,580 47,855 50,913 56,217 62,885 9 38,580 48,855 51,913 57,217 63,885 10 39,580 49,855 52,913 58,217 64,885 11 40,580 50,855 53,913 59,217 65,885 12 41,580 51,855 54,913 60,217 66,885 13 42,580 52,855 55,913 61,217 67,885 14 43,580 53,855 56,913 62,217 68,885 15 44,580 54,855 57,913 63,217 69,885 16 45,580 55,855 58,913 64,217 70,885 17 46,580 56,855 59,913 65,217 71,885 18 47,580 57,855 60,913 66,217 72,885 19 48,580 58,855 61,913 67,217 73,885 20 49,580 59,855 62,913 68,217 74,885 Currently - Prof/Other includes: Communication Specialist, Parent Liaison/Homeless, Parent Involvement and VIPS, and Clinical Counselors Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E-9 Step 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Information Technology Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8P2 Schedule Based on 191 Days Lo\nau .1,\n\"u Tech Lead Tech (w/o (with System certifications certifications Admin ' I II m IV 33,119 33,513 34,559 35,604 33,773 34,167 35,213 36,258 34,427 34,821 35,867 36,912 35,081 35,475 36,521 37,566 35,735 36,129 37,175 38,220 36,389 36,783 37,829 38,874 37,043 37,437 38,483 39,528 37,697 38,091 39,137 40,182 38,351 38,745 39,791 40,836 39,005 39,399 40,445 41,490 39,659 40,053 41,099 42,144 40,313 40,707 41,753 42,798 40,967 41,361 42,407 43,452 41,621 42,015 43,061 44,106 42,275 42,669 43,715 44,760 42,929 43,323 44,369 45,414 43,583 43,977 45,023 46,068 44,237 44,631 45,677 46,722 44,891 45,285 46,331 47,376 45,545 45,939 46,985 48,030 46,199 46,593 47,639 48,684 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an indiv:duRI dental/vision plan $ I 0.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E-10 Manager IT V 37,852 38,857 39,862 40,867 41,872 42,877 43,882 44,887 45,892 46,897 47,902 48,907 49,912 50,917 51,922 52,927 53,932 54,937 55,942 56,947 57,952 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Information Technology Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule : 7PT2 Schedule based on 190 Days I II Ill IV V Lead Tech Lead Tecb (w/o (with System Tech certifications) certifications) Admin Manaoer IT 0 32,300 32,684 33,704 34,724 36,916 1 32,950 33,334 34,354 35,374 37,916 2 33,600 33,984 35,004 36,024 38,916 3 34,250 34,634 35,654 36,674 39,916 4 34,900 35,284 36,304 37,324 40,916 5 35,550 35,934 36,954 37,974 41,916 6 36,200 36,584 37,604 38,624 42,916 7 36,850 37,234 38,254 39,274 43,916 8 37,500 37,884 38,904 39,924 44,916 9 38,150 38,534 39,554 40,574 45,916 10 38,800 39,184 40,204 41,224 46,916 11 39,450 39,834 40,854 41,874 47,916 12 40,100 40,484 41,504 42,524 48,916 13 40,750 41,134 42,154 43,174 49,916 14 41,400 41,784 42,804 43,824 50,916 15 42,050 42,434 43,454 44,474 51,916 16 42,700 43,084 44,104 45,124 52,916 17 43,350 43,734 44,754 45,774 53,916 18 44,000 44,384 45,404 46,424 54,916 19 44,650 45,034 46,054 47,074 55,916 20 45,300 45,684 46,704 47,724 56,916 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E - 11 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Computer Services Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8P3 Schedule Based on 191 Days Webmaster/Data/ Computer Oper Software Spec TechAdmin Step I II ill 01 19,715 37,494 22,080 02 20,369 38,499 22,734 03 21,023 39,504 23,388 04 21,677 40,509 24,042 05 22,331 41,514 24,696 06 22,985 42,519 25,350 07 23,639 43,524 26,004 08 24,293 44,529 26,658 09 24,947 45,534 27,312 10 25,601 46,539 27,966 11 26,255 47,544 28,620 12 26,909 48,549 29,274 13 27,563 49,554 29,928 14 28,217 50,559 30,582 15 28,871 51,564 31,236 16 29,525 52,569 31,890 17 30,179 53,574 32,544 18 30,833 54,579 33,198 19 31,487 55,584 33,852 20 32,141 56,589 34,506 21 32,795 57,594 35,160 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2. l 0 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E- 12 CURRENT North Little Rock School District Computer Services Salary Schedule 06-07 Schedule : 7PT3 Schedule Based on 190 days I II Ill Webmaster/Data/ Computer Oper Software Spec Tech Admin 0 19,227 36,567 21,533 1 19,877 37,567 22,183 2 20,527 38,567 22,833 3 21,177 39,567 23,483 4 21,827 40,567 24,133 5 22,477 41,567 24,783 6 23,127 42,567 25,433 7 23,777 43,567 26,083 8 24,427 44,567 26,733 9 25,077 45,567 27,383 10 25,727 46,567 28,033 11 26,377 47,567 28,683 12 27,027 48,567 29,333 13 27,677 49,567 29,983 14 28,327 50,567 30,633 15 28,977 51,567 31,283 16 29,627 52,567 31,933 17 30,277 53,567 32,583 18 30,927 54,567 33,233 19 31,577 55,567 33,883 20 32,227 56,567 34,533 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $ I 0.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $3.62 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E - 13 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I 7.75 8.05 8.35 8.65 8.95 9.25 9.55 9.85 10.15 10.45 10.75 11.05 11.35 11.65 11.95 12.25 12.55 12.85 13.15 13.45 13.75 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Child Nutrition Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8CN II ill IV 8.75 9.75 8.50 9.05 10.05 8.80 9.35 10.35 9.10 9.65 10.65' 9.40 9.95 10.95 9.70 10.25 11.25 10.00 10.55 11.55 10.30 10.85 11.85 10.60 11.15 12.15 10.90 11.45 12.45 11.20 11.75 12.75 11.50 12.05 13.05 11.80 12.35 13.35 12.10 12.65 13.65 12.40 12.95 13.95 12.70 13.25 14.25 13.00 13.55 14.55 13.30 13.85 14.85 13.60 14.15 15.15 13.90 14.45 15.45 14.20 14.75 15.75 14.50 I - Assistant Worker II-Elementary Manager Certified III-High School Manager Certified IV-Assistant Manager High School V-Manager Middle School Certified VI-Warehouse Manager Non-certified VII-Warehouse Assistant Non-certified VII-Manager Substitute Certified V VI 9.25 11.25 9.55 11.55 9.85 11.85 10.15 12.15 10.45 12.45 10.75 12.75 11.05 13.05 11.35 13.35 11.65 13.65 11.95 13.95 12.25 14.25 12.55 14.55 12.85 14.85 13.15 15.15 13.45 15.45 13.75 15.75 14.05 16.05 14.35 16.35 14.65 16.65 14.95 16.95 15.25 17.25 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $ I 0.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E- 14 VII vm 10.00 8.75 10.35 9.05 10.70 9.35 11.05 9.65 11.40 9.95 11.75 10.25 12.10 10.55 12.45 10.85 12.80 11.15 13.15 11.45 13.50 11.75 13.85 12.05 14.20 12.35 14.55 12.65 14.90 12.95 15.25 13.25 15.60 13.55 15.95 13.85 16.30 14.15 16.65 14.45 17.00 14.75 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Clerical Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8Cx I n m IV V VI vn 185 Days 207 Days 207 Days 223 Days 252 Days 252 Days 252 Days Schedule: 8Cl 8C2 8C2 8C3 8C4 8C4 8C4 01 15,000 19,100 20,000 22,125 25,000 26,000 27,000 02 15,450 19,673 20,600 22,789 25,750 26,780 27,810 03 15,900 20,246 21,200 23,453 26,500 27,560 28,620 04 16,350 20,819 21,800 24,117 27,250 28,340 29,430 05 16,800 21,392 22,400 24,781 28,000 29,120 30,240 06 17,250 21,965 23,000 25,445 28,750 29,900 31,050 07 17,700 22,538 23,600 26,109 29,500 30,680 31,860 08 18,150 23,111 24,200 26,773 30,250 31,460 32,670 09 18,600 23,684 24,800 27,437 31,000 32,240 33,480 10 19,050 24,257 25,400 28,101 31,750 33,020 34,290 11 19,500 24,830 26,000 28,765 32,500 33,800 35,100 12 19,950 25,403 26,600 29,429 33,250 34,580 35,910 13 20,400 25,976 27,200 30,093 34,000 35,360 36,720 14 20,850 26,549 27,800 30,757 34,750 36,140 37,530 15 21,300 27,122 28,400 31,421 35,500 36,920 38,340 16 21,750 27,695 29,000 32,085 36,250 37,700 39,150 17 22,200 28,268 29,600 32,749 37,000 38,480 39,960 18 22,650 28,841 30,200 33,413 37,750 39,260 40,770 19 23,100 29,414 30,800 34,077 38,500 40,040 41,580 20 23,550 29,987 31,400 34,741 39,250 40,820 42,390 21 24,000 30,560 32,000 35,405 40,000 41,600 43,200 I Secretary: General Secretaries in schools, Transportation, Maintenance, \u0026amp; Food Services II Sec/Registrar: Elementary Principal Secretary \u0026amp; Middle School Registrars III Sec/Registrar: High School Registrars and Office Secretaries IV Secretary I: Central Office Curriculum Secretaries V Secretary II: Payroll staff \u0026amp; Accounts Payable Staff\nMiddle School Principal Secretary VI Secretary III: Admin Director \u0026amp; Director Secretary, High School Principal VII Secretary IV: Superintendent, CFO, Assistant Superinten-de-nt ------------------ Professional Standards Increments for Secretaries: Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 Basic - 3 % per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes: Associate - 5% $5,000 life insurance Advanced I - 7 % $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan Advanced II - 8 % $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan Advanced III - 9 % $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage Professional - 9% $0.56 per month for group health life insurance Certified - 10% Associate degree - 8% Secretarial Diploma - 8% (% based on the step 01 of the lane where secretary located) Calculation:Amount = (((% * lane/step O I amount)/nurnber of contract days of lane) * number of contract days of employee)* FTE E - 15 261 Days 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Custodial Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8CU I II 7.75 8.45 7.98 8.74 8.21 9.03 8.44 9.32 8.67 9.61 8.90 9.90 9.13 10.19 9.36 10.48 9.59 10.77 9.82 11.06 10.05 11.35 10.28 11.64 10.51 11.93 10.74 12.22 10.97 12.51 11.20 12.80 11.43 13.09 11.66 13.38 11.89 13.67 12.12 13.96 12.35 14.25 I-Custodian II-Lead Custodian III-Head Custodian ill 9.01 9.32 9.63 . 9.94 10.25 10.56 10.87 11.18 11.49 11.80 12.11 12.42 12.73 13.04 13.35 13.66 13.97 14.28 14.59 14.90 15.21 IV-Maint Custodian, Warehouse V-Custodian Operations VI-Custodial Supervisor IV V 9.85 11.43 10.18 11.82 10.51 12.21 10.84 12.60 11.17 12.99 11.50 13.38 11.83 13.77 12.16 14.16 12.49 14.55 12.82 14.94 13.15 15.33 13.48 15.72 13.81 16.11 14.14 16.50 14.47 16.89 14.80 17.28 15.13 17.67 15.46 18.06 15.79 18.45 16.12 18.84 16.45 19.23 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes: $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E - 16 VI 14.38 14.92 15.46 16.00 16.54 17.08 17.62 18.16 18.70 19.24 19.78 20.32 20.86 21.40 21.94 22.48 23.02 23.56 24.10 24.64 25.18 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Instructional Assistants Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8PP 185 Day Schedules Instructional Aides Library Asst Comp Lab Elm Comp Lab Sec Step I II m IV 01 14,500 14,700 15,000 17,000 02 14,935 15,141 15,450 17,510 03 15,370 15,582 15,900 18,020 04 15,805 16,023 16,350 18,530 05 16,240 16,464 16,800 19,040 06 16,675 16,905 17,250 19,550 07 17,110 17,346 17,700 20,060 08 17,545 17,787 18,150 20,570 09 17,980 18,228 18,600 21,080 10 18,415 18,669 19,050 21,590 11 18,850 19,110 19,500 22,100 12 19,285 19,551 19,950 22,610 13 19,720 19,992 20,400 23,120 14 20,155 20,433 20,850 23,630 15 20,590 20,874 21,300 24,140 16 21,025 21,315 21,750 24,650 17 21,460 21,756 22,200 25,160 18 21,895 22,197 22,650 25,670 19 22,330 22,638 23,100 26,180 20 22,765 23,079 23,550 26,690 21 23,200 23,520 24,000 27,200 I Instructional Aides, Special Education Aides, SAC Aide II Library Assistants III Elementary Computer Lab Manager IV Secondary Computer Lab Manager % Increment of 8% if Degree Based on Lane/Step O I of lane employee resides Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E- 17 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Security/Non-Instructional Aides Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8Sx I II 8Sl 8S2 01 7.75 13,068.00 02 7.98 13,808.00 03 8.21 14,548.00 04 8.44 15,288.00 05 8.67 16,028.00 06 8.90 16,768.00 07 9.13 17,508.00 08 9.36 18,248.00 09 9.59 18,988.00 10 9.82 19,728.00 11 10.05 20,468.00 12 10.28 21,208.00 13 10.51 21,948.00 14 10.74 22,688.00 15 10.97 23,428.00 16 11.20 24,168.00 17 11.43 24,908.00 18 11.66 25,648.00 19 11.89 26,388.00 20 12.12 27,128.00 21 12.35 27,868.00 I-Crossing Guards, Lunch Aides, Early Morning Aides Il-Campus Supervisor, Security Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $ I 0.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2. IO per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E -18 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Maintenance Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8MA 261 Days I II m IV 01 8.83 11.43 14.38 17.02 02 9.21 11.83 14.83 17.60 03 9.59 12.23 15.28 18.18 04 9.97 12.63 15.73 18.76 05 10.35 13.03 16.18 19.34 06 10.73 13.43 16.63 19.92 07 11.11 13.83 17.08 20.50 08 11.49 14.23 17.53 21.08 09 11.87 14.63 17.98 21.66 10 12.25 15.03 18.43 22.24 11 12.63 15.43 18.88 22.82 12 13.01 15.83 19.33 23.40 13 13.39 16.23 19.78 23.98 14 13.77 16.63 20.23 24.56 15 14.15 17.03 20.68 25.14 16 14.53 17.43 21.13 25.72 17 14.91 17.83 21.58 26.30 18 15.29 18.23 22.03 26.88 19 15.67 18.63 22.48 27.46 20 16.05 19.03 22.93 28.04 21 16.43 19.43 23.38 28.62 I-Craft Helpers, Labor, Stadium Attendant II-HY AC Registrant, Locksmith, Painter, Roofer III-Energy Ed, Maint Carpenter, HY AC Mechanic, Maint Plumber IV-Lead Electrician, Lead HY AC, Lead Painter, Lead Plumber Y -Maintenance Supervisor Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2. 10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E - 19 V 19.35 20.05 20.75 21.45 22.15 22.85 23.55 24.25 24.95 25.65 26.35 27.05 27.75 28.45 29.15 29.85 30.55 31.25 31.95 32.65 33.35 PROPOSED North Little Rock School District Proposed Transportation Salary Schedule 07-08 Schedule: 8TR Step I 01 11.00 02 11.33 03 11.66 04 11.99 05 12.32 06 12.65 07 12.98 08 13.31 09 13.64 10 13.97 11 14.30 12 14.63 13 14.96 14 15.29 15 15.62 16 15.95 17 16.28 18 16.61 19 16.94 20 17.27 21 17.60 I-Bus Driver II-Shop Foreman III-Mechanic IV-Mechanic Helper V -Dispatcher VI-Trainer VII-Bus Aide II 18.00 18.54 19.08 19.62 20.16 20.70 21.24 21.78 22.32 22.86 23.40 23.94 24.48 25.02 25.56 26.10 26.64 27.18 27.72 28.26 28.80 Fringe Benefits include: $264.78 m IV V 17.00 11.00 12.25 17.51 11.33 12.61 ' 18.02 11.66 12.97 18.53 11.99 13.33 19.04 12.32 13.69 19.55 12.65 14.05 20.06 12.98 14.41 20.57 13.31 14.77 21.08 13.64 15.13 21.59 13.97 15.49 22.10 14.30 15.85 22.61 14.63 16.21 23.12 14.96 16.57 23.63 15.29 16.93 24.14 15.62 17.29 24.65 15.95 17.65 25.16 16.28 18.01 25.67 16.61 18.37 26.18 16.94 18.73 26.69 17.27 19.09 27.20 17.60 19.45 per month for an individual health insurance plan which includes $5,000 life insurance $28.16 per month for an individual dental/vision plan $10.65 per month for a hospital indemnity plan $2.10 per month for $16,000 life insurance coverage $0.56 per month for group health life insurance E-20 VI 12.25 12.61 12.97 13.33 13.69 14.05 14.41 14.77 15.13 15.49 15.85 16.21 16.57 16.93 17.29 17.65 18.01 18.37 18.73 19.09 19.45 VII 7.75 8.00 8.25 8.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.75 10.00 10.25 10.50 10.75 11.00 11.25 11.50 11.75 12.00 12.25 12.50 12.75 CURRENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2006-07 Classified Schedule Step Amt Step Amt Step Amt Step Amt Step Amt 1 6.05 51 9.95 101 16.36 151 26.91 201 44.25 2 6.11 52 10.05 102 16.52 152 27.18 202 44.69 3 6.17 53 10.15 103 16.69 153 27.45 203 45.14 4 6.23 54 10.25 104 16.86 154 27.72 204 45.59 5 6.29 55 10.35 105 17.02 155 28 205 46.05 6 6.36 56 10.46 106 17.19 156 28.28 206 46.51 7 6.42 57 10.56 107 17.37 157 28.56 207 46.97 8 6.48 58 10.67 108 17.54 158 28.85 208 47.44 9 6.55 59 10.77 109 17.72 159 29.14 209 47.92 10 6.62 60 10.88 110 17.89 160 29.43 210 48.4 11 6.68 61 10.99 111 18.07 161 29.72 12 6.75 62 11.1 112 18.25 162 30.02 13 6.82 63 11.21 113 18.44 163 30.32 14 6.88 64 11.32 114 18.62 164 30.62 15 6.95 65 11.43 115 18.81 165 30.93 16 7.02 66 11.55 116 18.99 166 31.24 17 7.09 67 11.66 117 19.18 167 31.55 18 7.16 68 11.78 118 19.38 168 31.87 19 7.24 69 11.9 119 19.57 169 32.18 20 7.31 70 12.02 120 19.77 170 32.51 21 7.38 71 12.14 121 19.96 171 32.83 22 7.45 72 12.26 122 20.16 172 33.16 23 7.53 73 12.38 123 20.36 173 33.49 24 7.6 74 12.51 124 20.57 174 33.83 25 7.68 75 12.63 125 20.77 175 34.16 26 7.76 76 12.76 126 20.98 176 34.51 27 7.83 77 12.88 127 21.19 177 34.85 28 7.91 78 13.01 128 21.4 178 35.2 29 7.99 79 13.14 129 21.62 179 35.55 30 8.07 80 13.28 130 21.83 180 35.91 31 8.15 81 13.41 131 22.05 181 36.27 32 8.23 82 13.54 132 22.27 182 36.63 33 8.32 83 13.68 133 22.49 183 37 34 8.4 84 13.81 134 22.72 184 37.37 35 8.48 85 13.95 135 22.95 185 37.74 36 8.57 86 14.09 136 23.18 186 38.12 37 8.65 87 14.23 137 23.41 187 38.5 38 8.74 88 14.38 138 23.64 188 38.88 39 8.83 89 14.52 139 23.88 189 39.27 40 8.92 90 14.66 140 24.12 190 39.66 41 9.01 91 14.81 141 24.36 191 40.06 42 9.1 92 14.96 142 24.6 192 40.46 43 9.19 93 15.11 143 24.85 193 40.87 44 9.28 94 15.26 144 25.1 194 41.27 45 9.37 95 15.41 145 25.35 195 41.69 46 9.46 96 15.57 146 25.6 196 42.1 47 9.56 97 15.72 147 25.86 197 42.52 48 9.66 98 15.88 148 26.12 198 42.95 49 9.75 99 16.04 149 26.38 199 43.38 50 9.85 100 16.2 150 26.64 200 43.81 Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E - 21 Catno Description - 200 Executive Secretary 201 Executive Sec-Comm 205 Secretary-Asst. Supt. 206 Secretary-Adm Director 209 Sec/Supvr-Bookkeeping 210 Secretary/Bookkeeper 215 Seer Dir/Prin 216 Teachers Aide/Esl 217 Teachers Aide/Welfare 220 Seer Elem Prin 225 Office Secretary 227 Elem Secretary 230 Secretary 231 Media Secretary 232 Guidance Office Secretary 235 General Office Secretary 236 Teachers Aide/Campus Supv 240 Teachers Aide/Spec Ed 241 Teachers Aide/Sac 242 Teachers Aide/Pre-School 243 Teachers Aide/Instruction 244 Teachers Aide/Comp Ed 245 Teachers Aide/Comp Lab 246 Teachers Aide/Chapter I 250 Teachers Aide/Hippy Home 251 Teachers Aide/Parent Cntr 252 Teachers Aide/Evenstart 253 Teachers Aide/Homeless 254 Teachers Aide/Bus-Stars 260 Teachers Aide/Lunch Duty 265 Teachers Aide/Crossing Gu 266 Teachers Aide/Early Morn 501 Head Mechanic 503 Mechanic 505 Mechanic's Helper 507 Bus Driver 509 Teachers Aide/Bus 511 Bus Driver/Dispatcher 600 Custodian 601 Lead Custodian 602 Lead Custodian W TIC 603 Head Custodian 604 Head Custodian W TIC CURRENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CLASSIFIED CATEGORIES 06-07 From To Catno Description 83 120 605 Maintenance Custodian 83 120 606 Maintenance Custodian Wtc 66 106 607 Warehouseman 59 101 608 Custodial Temporaries 91 115 610 Operations Manager 64 113 611 Supervisor Of Cust Serv 53 96 700 Supervisor Plant Services 78 119 701 Safety Coordinator 53 96 702 Enerav Manaoer 50 94 705 Lead Carpenter 50 94 706 Maintenance Carpenter 48 92 710 Lead Electrician 44 90 711 Maintenance Electrician 44 90 715 Energy Specialist 44 90 716 Maintenance Energy Mngt 44 90 718 Maintenance Helper 65 113 720 Lead Hvac 44 90 721 Hvac Mechanic 44 90 725 Labor Foreman 44 90 726 General Labor Leader 44 90 727 General Labor 44 90 728 Gen Labor-Stadium Attnd 44 90 729 Maintenance Temporaries 44 90 735 Lead Painter 44 90 736 Painter 44 90 740 Lead Plumber 44 90 741 Maintenance Plumber 44 90 746 Roofer 46 95 765 Security Monitor 18 66 901 Food Serv Asst. (Worker} 18 66 902 Food Serv Mgr/Elm/Non-Cer 18 66 903 Food Serv Mgr/Elem/Cert 88 132 904 Food Serv Mor/Sec/Non-Cer 78 127 905 Food Serv Mgr/Sec/Cert 46 94 906 Food Serv Asst. Mor Hs/Nc 46 95 907 Food Serv Asst Mgr/Hs/C 22 70 908 Food Srv Wrehse Mor/Ne 46 103 909 Food Serv Wrehse Mgr/Cer 18 66 910 Food Serv Wrehse Asst. 27 77 911 Food Serv Mgr/Sub/Ne 31 80 912 Food Serv Mgr/Sub/Cert 37 88 41 91 Board Adopted: November 16, 2006 E- 22 From To 46 94 50 97 46 94 4 30 65 113 88 134 95 165 65 113 88 132 88 152 65 113 95 152 88 132 95 154 65 113 39 94 95 152 88 132 65 113 24 94 24 90 24 90 22 46 88 152 65 113 95 152 88 132 65 113 24 113 18 66 27 77 31 80 37 88 41 91 27 77 31 80 45 94 49 96 39 94 27 77 31 80 PROPOSED BUDGET OF EXPENDITURES TOGETHER WITH TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2008 TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 30, 2009 The Board of Directors of the North Little Rock School District No. 1 of Pulaski County, Arkansas, in compliance with the requirements of Ark. Code 6-13-622 and Amendment No. 40 and No. 74 of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas has prepared, approved and does hereby make public a proposed budget of expenditures for the district in 2008- 2009 together with a supporting tax rate. The proposed budget of expenditures includes: 1. Salary Fund Expenditures $47,250,000 2. Instructional Expense 21,540,750 3. Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Expense 7,140,000 4. Pupil Transportation Expense 3,853,500 5. Other Operating Expense 1,449,000 6. Nonbonded Debt Payment 450,000 7. Bonded Debt Payment 1,600,000 8. Building Fund Expense 2,100,000 9. Dedicated M \u0026amp; 0 (Current Expend/Capital Outlay) 1,680,000 To provide for the foregoing proposed budget of expenditures, the Board of Directors proposes a total tax rate (state and local) of 40.9 mills on the dollar of the assessed value of taxable property located in this School District. The proposed tax includes the uniform rate of 25.0 mills (the \"Statewide Uniform Rate\") to be collected on all taxable property in the State and remitted to the State Treasurer pursuant to Amendment No. 74 to the Arkansas Constitution to be used solely for maintenance and operation of schools in the State. As provided in Amendment No. 74, the Statewide Uniform Rate replaces a portion of the existing rate of tax levied by this School District and available for maintenance and operation of schools in this District. This total tax levy includes 28. 7 mills for maintenance and operation of schools\n2.9 mills for dedicated maintenance and operation Millage (formerly current expenditure/capital outlay) dedicated for the purpose of purchasing school buses, purchasing furniture and equipment to support instructional programs, purchasing computer software, and renovating, repairing and equipping existing facilities\nand 9 .3 mills for debt service previously voted as a continuing levy and pledged for retirement of existing bonded indebtedness. Surplus revenues produced each year by debt service. Millage may be used by the District for other school purposes. This request represents no increase ir. the total tax from the previous year. Given this 18th day of July 2007 North Little Rock School District No. 1 of Pulaski County, Arkansas Trent Cox President of School Board Marty Moore Secretary of School Board F-1 I North Llttle Rock School District ocal Revenue  Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue Revenue From Intermediate Source !Severance Tax Revenue from State Sources-Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding 0th Unrestr Grants-in-Aid TOTAL UNRE STRICT ED-ST ATE/LOCAL Revenue from State Sources-Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Misc State TOTAL REST RICTED-ST ATE TOTAL REVE Building Fun Capital Outla Food Service Federal TOTAL REVE NUE OPERATIONS d y s NUE JUNE 2007 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $12,510,000.00 $341,241.10 $13,072,972.43 $6,250,000.00 $1,053,093.03 $6,467,704.41 $1,471,000.00 $64,898.94 $1,645,863.20 $310,000.00 $0.00 $277,049.20 $185,000.00 $25,497.17 $224,711.08 $62,000.00 $4,099.87 $196,780.21 $105,000.00 $50,551.98 $100,708.75 $900,000.00 $149,873.59 $1,144,247.69 $79,000.00 $5,741.15 $64,070.54 $84,460.00 $18,434.37 $155,110.93 $21,956,460.00 $1,713,431.20 $23,349,218.44 $10,100.00! $0.00! $9,145.44! $35,477,276.00 $3,225,207.00 $35,477,276.00 $0.00 $30,618.00 $185,814.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,100.00 $57,445,836.00 $4,969,256.20 $59,023,553.88 $534,639.00 $63,444.00 $556,440.51 $4,903,623.00 $550,996.00 $4,285,366.00 $2,213,250.00 $1,882.57 $2,286,336.73 $6,980,000.00 $464,514.36 $6,514,921.06 $381,715.00 $19,357.52 $457,852.92 $52,500.00 $20,597.13 $88,520.10 $15,065,727.00 $1,120,791.58 $14,189,437.32 $72,511,563.00 $6,090,047.78 $73,212,991.20 $233,000.00 $525,644.27 $2,286,627.20 $1,550,000.00 $111,371.58 $1,616,998.97 $3,669,000.00 $323,104.24 $3,677,191.28 $7,181,864.00 $1,576,972.35 $7,647,223.14 $85,145,427.00 $8,627,140.22 $88,441,031.79 0-1 %YTD Budget Balance Actual/Bud -$562,972.43 104.50% -$217,704.41 103.48% -$174,863.20 111.89% $32,950.80 89.37% -$39,711.08 121.47% -$134,780.21 317.39% $4,291.25 95.91% -$244,247.69 127.14% $14,929.46 81.10% -$70,650.93 183.65% -$1,392,758.44 106.34% $954.56! 90.55%! $0.00 100.00% -$185,814.00 -$100.00 105.00% -$1,577,717.88 102.75% -$21,801.51 104.08% $618,257.00 87.39% -$73,086.73 103.30% $465,078.94 93.34% -$76, 137 .92 119.95% -$36,020.10 168.61% $876,289.68 94.18% -$701,428.20 100.97% -$2,053,627 .20 981.39% -$66,998.97 104.32% -$8,191.28 100.22% -$465,359.14 106.48% -$3,295,604. 79 103.87% Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOTAL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof/Tech Services Purchased Property Services Other Purchased Services Suoolies and Materials Property Other Obiects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND BUILDING FUND FEDERAL FUND FOOD SERVICE FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES North Llttle Rock School District JUNE 2007 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $37,526,650.00 $8,153,627.04 $37,353,109.34 $9,846,135.00 1,180,317.30 $8,826,195.13 $9,779,440.00 $1,620,703.72 $10,900,839.08 $3,975,887.00 $366,772.33 $3,644,392.87 $61,128,112.00 $11,321,420.39 $60,724,536.42 $1,421,058.D0 $150,567.09 $810,380.35 $980,780.60 $102,672.33  $922,205.39 $2,600,000.00 $189,854.96 $3,096,604.85 $4,250,000.00 $356,458.09 $4,099,703.12 $2,208,614.00 $18,040.93 $2,130,594.64 $700,000.00 $1,575.00 $1,337,781.18 $1,110,370.00 $0.00 $353,421.05 $13,270,822.60 $819,168.40 $12,750,690.58 $74,398,934.60 $12,140,588.79 $73,475,227.00 $1,791,824.00 $106,562.96 $1,099,935.78 $5,530,900.00 $828,620.27 $6,560,036.70 $7,751,725.93 $1,471,487.59 $6,636,730.82 $3,212,423.00 $258,038.31 $3,519,430.08 $92,685,807.53 $14,805,297.92 $91,291,360.38 0-2 %Ytd Budget Balance ActuaUBud $173,540.66 99.54% $1,019,939.87 89.64% -$1, 121,399.08 111.47% $331,494.13 91.66% $403,575.58 99.34% $610,677.65 57.03% $58,575.21 94.03% -$496,604.85 119.10% $150,296.88 96.46% $78,019.36 96.47% -$637,781.18 191.11% $756,948.95 31.83% $520,132.02 96.08% $923,707.60 98.76% $691,888.22 61.39% -$1,029, 136. 70 118.61% $1,114,995.11 85.62% -$307,007.08 109.56% $1,394,447.15 98.50% Function Category 11 XX Regular Programs-Elem/Sec 12XX Special Education 13XX Workforce Education 15XX Compensatory Education 19XX Other Instructional 21XX Suooort Services-Students 22XX Suport Services-Instruction 23XX Suooort Services-Administration 24XX Suooort Services-Sch Admin 25XX Suooort Services-Business 26XX M \u0026amp; 0 Plant Services 27XX Pupil Transportation 28XX Suooort Services-Central 29XX Other Suooort Services 31XX Food Services 33XX Community Service Operations 34XX Other Non-Instr Services 43XX Site Improvement Services 5XX Ed Spec Dev Services 46XX BldQ Acq/Constr Services 47XX Building Improvements 51XX LEA Indebtedness 53XX Payment to other LEA 55XX Indirect CosUAdmin CharQes GRAND TOTAL North Little Rock School District FUNCTION JUNE 2007 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $28,584,257.10 $5,612,263.15 $27,647,970.46 $9,561,331.69 $1,999,502.71 $9,036,761.34 $1,564,621.37 $228,891.05 $1,430,728.23 $4,340,644.20 $895,549.22 $2,966,733.05 $3,826,038.74 $765,573.50 $3,901,182.90 $6,055,139.19 $1,210,422.90 $6,372,512.97 $5,365,715.06 $998,597.76 $5,735,376.88 $1,210,728.13 $103,934.33 $1,235,342.19 $4,039,640.57 $604,700.86 $4,237,115.14 $1,428,158.93 $132,211.40 $1,312,054.68 $6,524,519.03 $707,728.45 $6,541,994.15 $3,547,667.77 $269,177.56 $3,651,853.33 $945,077.33 $73,290.40 $971,543.28 $436,103.89 $30,208.75 $505,669.64 $3,997,597.66 $310,338.05 $4,160,654.94 $47,274.41 $14,512.39 $41,907.45 $123,406.25 $16,308.24 $132,236.71 $938,867.80 $1,490.00 $695,445.55 $0.00 $628,018.26 $999,750.43 $12,225.33 $1,118.43 $26,078.48 $6,402,208.35 $200,463.26 $6,874,452.65 $1,923,825.10 $997.25 $1,607,475.17 $1,692,738.14 $0.00 $1,206,520.76 $117,551.26 $0.00 $0.00 $92,685,337.32 $14,805,297.92 $91,291,360.38 0-3 ~. Ytd Budget Balance Actual/Bud $936,286.64 96.72% $524,570.35 94.51% $133,893.14 91.44% $1,373,911.15 68.35% -$75,144.16 101.96% -$317,373.78 105.24% -$369,661.82 106.89% -$24,614.06 102.03% -$197,474.57 104.89% $116,104.25 91.87% -$17,475.12 100.27% -$104, 185.56 102.94% -$26,465.95 102.80% -$69,565.75 115.95% -$163,057.28 104.08% $5,366.96 88.65% -$8,830.46 107.16% $243,422.25 74.07% -$999,750.43 -$13,853.15 213.32% -$472,244.30 107.38% $316,349.93 83.56% $486,217.38 71.28% $117,551.26 0.00% $1,393,976.94 98.50% North Uttle Rock school District SOURCE OF FUNDS  JUNE 2007 Current Month  Ytd Source of Funds Category Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual Budget Balance Actual/Bud 000 Non-categorical $67,861,196.61 $11,121,259.57 $68,285,028.16 -$423,831.55 100.62 213 Intensive School Improvement $1,128.49 $0.00 $729.90 $398.59 64.68% 223 Prof Development Act 59 $419,005.01 $116,816.49 $387,757.34 $31,247.67 92.54% 225 Technology Grant $1,626.91 $0.00 $0.00 $1,626.91 0.00% 227 CPEP $78,552.45 $11,371.50 $21,172.04 $57,380.41 26.95% 240 Child w/Dis-Supvr $0.00 $9,446.60 $9,446.60 -$9,446.60 245 Pathwise Mentoring $85,953.48 $35,917.31 $104,481.42 -$18,527.94 121.56% 250 Act 591 Residential $48,901.32 $0.00 $21,105.00 $27,796.32 43.16% 260 Early Childhood Sp Ed $982,979.62 $158,386.95 $909,779.89 $73,199.73 92.55% 271 GIT Advance Placement $4,523.03 $325.00 $1,222.17 $3,300.86 27.02% 275 Alternative Leaming Environment $1,283,801.76 $63,343.56 $1,031,216.49 $252,585.27 80.33% 276 English Lang Learners $36,309.23 $12,509.34 $35,361.01 $948.22 97.39% 281 NSLA $2,303,528.84 $465,402.63 $2,392,233.28 -$88,704.44 103.85% 365 ABC Preschool $2,409,866.65 $426,385.62 $2,018,993.24 $390,873.41 83.78% 381 Smart Start Literacy $74,838.77 $5,747.54 $75,809.62 -$970.85 101.30% 392 General Facility Funding $571,534.22 $66,155.45 $704,104.27 -$132,570.05 123.20% 398 OHS Preschool Improvement $940.41 $1,931.67 $3,502.15 -$2,561.74 372.41% 399 Other Gmts in Aid from State $0.00 $0.00 $240.00 -$240.00 401 Academic Fae lmmed Repair $2,111,549.76 $0.00 $1,991,767.85 $119,781.91 94.33% 403 Academic Fae Transitional Pgm $4,878,659.39 $200,602.01 $5,289,113.65 -$410,454.26 108.41% 404 Academic Fae Partnership Pgm $322,654.70 $628,018.26 $1,270,923.05 -$948,268.35 393.90% 406 lmprv Lit Thru Libraries $4,123.22 $0.00 $4,358.47 -$235.25 105.71% 430 ROTC $119,009.84 $18,701.58 $123,719.43 -$4,709.59 103.96% 441 Title IV-8 21st Century $193,747.24 $16,867.07 $126,031.40 $67,715.84 65.05% 467 Hurricane Relief-Homeless $0.00 $0.00 $40.22 -$40.22 501 Title I-Rea Comp Ed $4,106,564.85 $608,394.98 $2,612,956.62 $1,493,608.23 63.63% 520 Title V-A Innovative Program $9,404.10 $67,672.81 $67,672.81 -$58,268.71 719.61% 523 Title I Reading First $294,198.13 $99,303.57 $288,703.48 $5,494.65 98.13% 530 Homeless-Stewart McKinney $34,795.17 $211.02 $12,824.92 $21,970.25 36.86% 535 Title V-8 Charter Schools $47,678.79 $2,373.28 $41,329.66 $6,349.13 86.68% 565 Teacher Quality Enhancement $67,652.16 $15,749.40 $69,937.65 -$2,285.49 103.38% 570 Carl Perkins Vocational $202,278.45 $27,138.02 $74,188.44 $128,090.01 36.68% 595 Title 11-DE d Tech $0.00 $3,210.51 $3,210.51 -$3,210.51 702 Title Vl-8 PL 94-142 $1,798,865.29 $319,832.46 $1,470,479.04 $328,386.25 81.74% 710 Sp Ed Preschool Sec 619 $879,728.52 $161,736.41 $857,388.39 $22,340.13 97.46% 750 Medicaid $169,627.41 $25,825.87 $174,629.79 -$5,002.38 102.95% 751 Medicaid Sp Ed Preschool $79,934.86 $3,798.46 $62,721.61 $17,213.25 78.47% 754 Javits  GIT Grant $9,404.10 $0.00 $9,966.21 -$562.11 105.98% 756 Title II-A Improve Teaching $889,854.57 $80,062.88 $539,996.19 $349,858.38 60.68% 761 Title Ill Eng Lang Acqui $17,658.08 $0.00 $8,874.84 $8,783.24 50.26% 781 Title IV-A Drug Ed $56,080.41 $11,821.92 $52,033.73 $4,046.68 92.78% 785 Comprehensive Sch Health $14,952.53 $5,087.25 $16,304.72 -$1,352.19 109.04% 796 Workforce Investment Act $25,861.28 $3,700.10 $22,164.11 $3,697.17 85.70% 798 Fulbright Grani $0.00 $0.00 $1,945.00 -$1,945.00 995 Soft Drink Acct $186,837.85 $10,190.83 $95,896.01 $90,941.84 51.33% GRAND TOTAL $92,685,807.53 $14,805,297.92 $91,291,360.38 $1,394,447.15 98.50% 0-4 $80,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 $50,000,000.00 $40,000,000.00 $30,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00  Budget fa Expenses NLRSD Actual to Budget Comparison As of JUNE, 2007 Operating Building Capital Outlay Federal Food Service $74,398,934.60 $5,530,900.00 $1,791,824.00 $7,751,725.93 $3,212,423.00 $73,475,227.34 $6,560,036.70 $1,099,935.78 $6,636,730.82 $3,519,430.08 Funds 0-5  Budget li!llExpenses NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Board Agenda-July 18, 2007 ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES Sara Logan Phyllis McDonald Anita Bell Matt Binford Elaine Burton Penny Elliott Deedra Lee Kathern Murphy From Indian Hills Elementary - Assistant Principal To Lakewood Elementary- Principal Effective 7/19/2007 From Poplar Street Middle - Assistant Principal To Rose City Middle- Principal Effective 7/19/2007 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From Guidance Counselor - NLRHS East Campus To Head Guidance Counselor - NLRHS East Campus Effective 7/19/2007 From NLRHS East Campus - Special Ed. Teacher To Ridgeroad- Special Ed. Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Pike View Elementary - 5th Grade Teacher To Poplar Street Middle - MS Math/Science Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Lakewood Middle - English Teacher NLRHS West Campus-English Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From North Heights Elementary - Special Ed. Teacher To North Heights Elementary- Literacy Coach Effective 8/13/07 From Rose City Middle - English Teacher To Lakewood Middle-English Teacher Effective 8/13/07 P-1 Chasity Nutz Shannon Oberlag Stacy Reed Prisca Selhorst Melinda Smith Terri Valentine Kathy Weaver Jeanne Williams CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES (Continued) From Lynch Drive Elementary - 1st Grade Teacher To Lynch Drive Elementary-3 rd Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Ridgerqad Middle Charter - Media Clerk To Ridgeroad Middle Charter -Art Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Redwood Early Childhood-Pre-K Teacher To Meadow Park Elementary- Pre-K Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From NLRHS East Campus-English Teacher To NLRHS West Campus - Speech and Drama Teacher Effective 8/13/2007 From Lakewood Middle - Social Studies Teacher To Poplar Street Middle - Language Arts I Social Studies Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Ridgeroad Middle Charter- Social Studies Teacher To NLRHS East Campus-Speech and Drama Teacher Effective 8/13/2007 From Glenview Elementary - Special Ed. Teacher To Glenview Elementary-First Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07 From Lynch Drive Elementary-Pre-K Teacher To Park Hill Elementary- Pre-K Teacher Effective 8/13/07 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND TERMINATIONS Robin Johnson Boone Park Elementary, Special Education Teacher Effective 6-13-07 Rebecca Kimbrough ---- Lakewood Elementary, Third Grade Teacher Effective 6-22-07 P-2 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, AND TERMINATIONS (Continued) Jamie McNeill Katy Monnot Lena Priest Alex Pritchett Shelly Ritter Roseanne Sallis Dawn Simpson Beth Smith Harold Stark Amanda Campbell Sarah Childers Rochelle Crouch Kathryn Eck Boone Park Elementary, Fourth Grade Teacher Effective 7-09-07 Ridgeroad Middle Charter, Special Education Teacher Effective 7-03-07 Lakewood Middle, Social Studies Teacher Effective 6-15-07 Poplar Street Middle, Art Teacher Effective 6-26-07 Park Hill Elementary, Second Grade Teacher Effective 6-13-07 NLRHS West Campus, P.E. /Health/Asst. Volleyball Effective 6-19-07 NLRHS East Campus, Social Studies Effective 6-04-07 NLRHS East Campus, Special Education Teacher Effective 6-29-07 NLRHS West Campus, JAG Teacher Effective 6-20-07 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS Lynch Drive Elementary - Fourth Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Tri-District Early Childhood Program - Speech Pathologist Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Lynch Drive Elementary- Special Education Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 1, 191 days Tri-District Early Childhood Program - Speech Pathologist Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days P-3 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS ( Continued) Casey Gorman Lynch Drive Elementary-Second Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Janelle Mackey-Jasper---- Lynch Drive Elementary-Literacy Coach Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 20, 191 days Leslie Nipper Lynch Drive Elementary-First Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days April Richardson Lynch Drive Elementary-Fourth Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Robin Roark NLRHS East Campus-English Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Amber Runsick Belwood Elementary- .5 Media Specialist Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 8, 96 days Tina South NLRHS West Campus- Math Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Valerie Stavey NLRHS West Campus-English Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 13, 191 days Taylor Thielemier NLRHS West Campus-Math Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Jessica Tiffin Tri-District Early Childhood Program - Speech Pathologist Effective 8/13/07, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Verlancie Tucker Ridgeroad Middle Charter - Business Technology Effective 8/08/07, Category IV, Step 00, 200 days Naomi Turner-Fischer---- Indian Hills Elementary-Fourth Grade Teacher Effective 8/13/07, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Carla Whittington Poplar Street Middle -Art Teacher Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 5, 191 days P-4 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Amanda Campbell Fourth Grade, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree -Arkansas State University\n5/2007 Elementary Childhood P-4 Vilonia Primary, Conway, AR 1/2007 - 5/2007 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Sarah Childers Speech Language Pathologist, Tri-District Early Childhood Program Effective 8/13/2007, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Master's Degree - University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, 5/2007 Speech Language Pathology Access Schools, 9/2005 - 8/2006 Arkansas Children's Hospital 8/2006 - 1/2007 Thelma Jasper, Coordinator of Tri-District Early Childhood Program Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Rochelle Crouch Special Education Teacher, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step l, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 8/1992 Standard Five Year, Elementary Education 1-6, Middle School Social Studies 5-8 with an ALP in Special Ed. Indian Hills Elementary, 1/1992 - 5/1992 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Kathryn Eck Speech Language Pathologist, Tri-District Early Childhood Program Effective 8/13/2007, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Master's Degree - University of Central Arkansas, 5/2007 New Application, Speech Language Pathology Ellen Smith Elementary, 1/2006 - 5/2006 Tri-District Early Childhood Program Thelma Jasper, Coordinator, Tri-District Early Childhood Program Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-5 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION (Continued) NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Casey Gorman Second Grade, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree -Arkansas Tech University, 5/2007 Initial Three Year, Early Childhood P-4 Crawford Elemontary, Russellville, AR Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Janelle Mackey-Jasper Literacy Coach, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category VII, Step 20, 191 days Master's Degree - Harding University, 12/2005 Standard Five Year, Elementary Education 1-6 Conway Middle School Loretta Hassell, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Leslie Nipper First Grade, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Master's Degree- Harding University, 5/2007 Initial Three Year, Early Childhood P-4 Augusta Elementary, 1/2006- 5/2006 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel April Richardson Fourth Grade, Lynch Drive Elementary Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree -Arkansas State University, 8/2007 Initial Three Year, Early Childhood P-4 Philadelphia Elementary, 1/2007 - 3/2007 Loretta Hassell, Principal, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-6 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION (Continued) NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE TEACHING EXPERIENCE RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: TEACHING EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Robin Roark English Teacher, NLRHS East Campus Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 8/2005 Non-Traditional Licensure Program, Eng. /Language Arts 7-12 Learning Gateways, 9/2005 - 5/2007 Lee Tackett, Principal, NLRHS - East Campus Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Amber Runsick .5 Media Specialist, Belwood Elementary Effective 8/9/2007, Category IV, Step 8, 96 days Master's Degree - University of Central Arkansas, 8/2006 Standard Five Year, Early Childhood P-4\nLibrary Media Science P-8 \u0026amp; 7-12 Pike View Elementary, 8/2000 - 6/2004 Belwood Elementary, 8/2005 - 6/2006 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Tina South Physical Science, NLRHS East Campus Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 5/2007 Initial Three Year, Physical/Earth Science 7-12 Rose City Middle, 1/07 - 4/07 Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Valerie Stavey English, NLRHS West Campus Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 13, 191 days Bachelor's Degree, Florida State University, 4/2006 Reciprocity, Language Arts, 7-12 Mount Dora High, Mt. Dora, FL 8/06 - 5/07 Eustis Middle, Eustis, FL 8/1996 - 5/2006 Anita Cameron, Principal, NLRHS West Campus Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-7 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION (Continued) NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Taylor Thielemier Math Teacher, NLRHS West Campus Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree, Arkansas State University, 5/2007 Initial Three Year, Mathematics 7-12 Westside High School, 1/2007 - 5/2007 Anita Cameron, Principal, NLRHS West Campus Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel NAME: Jessica Tiffin PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Speech/Language Pathologist, Tri-District Early Childhood Program EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Effective 8/13/2007, Category IV, Step 00, 191 days Master's Degree, University of Central Arkansas, 8/2007 Speech/Language Pathology Speech-Language Hearing Center, 1/2007 - 4/2007 Thelma Jasper, Director of Tri-District Early Childhood Program Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel NAME: Verlancie Tucker PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Business Technology, Ridgeroad Middle Charter EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Effective 8/8/2007, Category IV, Step 00, 195 days Master's Degree, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 8/2007 Initial Three Year, Business Technology 7-12, 8/2007 North Pulaski High School, 8/2005 - 12/2005 Lenisha Broadway, Principal, Ridgeroad Middle Charter Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel NAME: Naomi Turner-Fischer PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Fourth Grade, Indian Hills Elementary EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 00, 191 days Bachelor's Degree, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 8/2007 Initial Three Year, Early Childhood P - 4, 5/2006 Crystal Hills Elementary, 8/2004 - 12/2004 Sheryl Smith, Principal, Indian Hills Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-8 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION (Continued) NAME: Carla Whittington PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Art Teacher, Poplar Street Middle EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: Effective 8/13/2007, Category I, Step 5, 191 days Bachelor's Degree, Ouachita Baptist University, 5/1996 Art P-8\u0026amp; 7-12 Arkadelphia Public School, 8/1995 - 12/1995 Bill Bowers, Principal, Poplar Street Middle Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGN A TIO NS, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS Nancy Curran Jerry Davidson Janda Eskridge LaDonnah Johnson Sherrell Layton Ozetta Robinson Sharon Russell Erica Satterfield Judy Taylor Dana Williams Maintenance Department - General Office Secretary Effective 7-27-07 NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 6-01-07 NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 5-31-07 Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 4-17-07 Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 3-09-07 Lakewood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 6-01-07 NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 5-31-07 Child Nutrition Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 5-11-07 Glenview Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 6-26-07 Lynch Drive Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 6-04-07 P-9 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS (Continued) Hazel Williams Leola Williams Ridgeroad Middle Charter - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8-01-07 Boone Park Elementary - Early Morning Aide Effective 6-21..-07 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES LaShunda Adams Antoinette Thames Leola Williams Teresa Lee Danny Williams From Lynch Drive Elementary- Pre-School Paraprofessional To Park Hill Elementary - Pre-School Paraprofessional From Redwood Early Childhood Center - Pre-School Paraprofessional To Meadow Park Elementary - Pre-School Paraprofessional From Boone Park Elementary - Pre-School Paraprofessional To Boone Park Elementary- Elementary Secretary NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Administration Office - Secretary to Administrative Director of Elementary Education and Administrative Director of Secondary Education, Effective 7-09-07 Child Nutrition Department- Warehouse/Driver Effective 8-01-2007 P-10 NORTHL ITTLER OCKS CHOOLD ISTRICT JULY2 007B IDSF ORA PPROVAL BIDN UMBER0: 8-07-072 BIDN AME:B ooneP arkP laygrounEdq uipment SOURCEO F FUNDINGC: apitaOl utlay LOCATIONB:o oneP arkE lementarSyc hool PachecoO utdooEr quipmenItn, c. GameT imeC /OS outhwesPt arks\u0026amp; Playgrounds BIDN UMBER0: 8-06-064 BIDN AME8:  x 11C opyP aperp ricep erc ase SOURCEO F FUNDINGG: eneraFl unds LOCATIONW: arehouse Ricoh PrintingP apersI,n c. CorporateE xpress Unisource Didn otm eets pecifications Part of all or no bid Qualityn otr econvnended LimitedC overage Recommended $42,345.36 $41,544.7.1..*. $26.62 $26.10 ***** $28.00 $27.50 R-1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 468m CHEMICLA BATTALION 1201 BOND STREET LITTLE ROCK AR 72202-4298 MEMORANDUM For School Principal or Facility Coordinator 20 June 2007 SUBJECT: Requesting Use of School Auditorium for Welcome Home Ceremony 1. The 468 th Chemical Battalion respectfully requests the use of the school auditorium for the Welcome Home Ceremony for the 468th Chemical Battalion and the 392d Chemical Company. Both units were mobilized in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and have safely returned home with all their Soldiers. Both the 468th and the 392d have their unit headquarters located on Bond Street in Little Rock. Members from each unit have citizen Soldiers from North Little Rock, Little Rock, and surrounding communities in the central Arkansas region. 2. The Welcome Home Ceremony is scheduled for 22 July 2007, at 1 :00pm. The ceremony will last approximately two hours and will be in honor of 60 Soldiers. Seating will be needed for approximately 120 to 180 people. Additionally I respectfully request the use of a podium and microphone for the duration of the ceremony. 3. 468 th e Chemical Battalion will be directly responsible for decorating, seating and clean up of the facility to ensure cleanness of the facility prior to departing. .e 4. Point of Contact this headquarters is Luke Watson 1-800-501-1493 ext. 0221. S-1 TERISA L. LIBERTY CPT, CM S3 ~ ~J~ ~1\\!l~[QJ FINANCE/PURCHAASUINDGIT/ rrtu1,. -.. ..,~ ~- -~ ... -- July 5, 2007 To: Barry Kincl Anita Cameron ~rom: Jan Scholl. Director- NLR Mayor's Youth Council (834-3784) Re: Use-of the old gym at NLR West Campus for a fundraisar for the NLR Mayor'\u0026amp; Youth Council The NLR Mayor's Youth Council ie planning to h,ve a \"great garage sale\" on July z~ and 28th We would be grateful if we could use the old gym at Wtst Campus for those two days. I understand that we will be expected to pay a custodian to be Chervo n Saturday with us. The money raised frOm this event WiU be used for afler-sc.hoot programs at our Club locations and at the Boys and Girls Club to finish the teen room. FINANCE/PURCHAASUIDNIGT/ S-2  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT A T \u0026amp; T A T \u0026amp; T A T \u0026amp; T AT \u0026amp; T LONG DISTANCE A+ ABILITY PLUS INC A+ GRADES UP A+ GRADES UP A+ GRADES UP A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-ZIN HOME TUTORING LLC A'TEST CONSULTANTSIN C AAAE AAAE AAEA AAEA AAEA AATFACS/FACS INSERVICE ABBRA BEST ABC ADVERTISING ABC ADVERTISING ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABERNATHYC OMPANY ACCESS SCHOOLS ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. AEA AEA AEA AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AG-PRO OF STUTTGART AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED T- 1 AMOUNT . 00 4,186.46 87.59 5,345.82 174.85 8,460.00 18,768.00 3,690.00 11,810.00 875.39 1,305.84 1,634.75 3,878.35 774.87 20,350.00 27.00 175. 00 175.00 241. 32 60.82 250.00 250.00 24.96 5,516.86 617.63 13.93 152.31 2,912.50 488.25 1,307.70 12,532.84 11,644.92 9,475.98 1,433.78 679.20 171. 20 171.20 2,137.00 210.00 2,137.00 210.00 2,074.50 2,074.50 1,499.50 1,499.50 191. 60 12,736.82 3,332.49 795.00 CHK. NO . 0 68925 69199 69928 69814 69472 69473 69737 70011 69076 69308 69537 69823 70072 69759 69281 69660 69714 69324 69582 69640 69717 69156 69010 69732 69641 70031 69390 69127 69642 69105 69881 69905 69689 69366 69830 69860 68705 68739 69121 69321 69553 69566 69604 69617 69137 69051 69282 70050 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. AKJ EDUCATIONALS ERVICES 153.79 69267 ALAN CROWNOVER 150.39 68923 ALAN CROWNOVER 216.45 69924 ALARMCOIN CORPORATED 2,714.96 69041 ALEXANDRAPR ITCHETT 63.03 69151 ALFAXW HOLESALEF URNITUREI NC. 714.00 69140 ALIBRIS DEPT. 33328 176. 65 69740 ALICIA YARBROUGH 38.06 69064 ALIGN .00 68695 V ALIGN .00 68709 V ALIGN .00 68730 V ALIGN .00 68847 V ALIGN .00 68856 V ALIGN .00 68912 V ALIGN .00 68917 V ALIGN .00 69078 V ALIGN .00 69111 V ALIGN .00 69125 V ALIGN .00 69312 V ALIGN .00 69322 V ALIGN .00 69343 V ALIGN .00 69362 V ALIGN .00 69376 V ALIGN .00 69540 V ALIGN . 00 69544 V  ALIGN .00 69557 V ALIGN .00 69570 V ALIGN .00 69580 V ALIGN .00 69595 V ALIGN .00 69608 V ALIGN .00 69622 V ALIGN .00 69627 V ALIGN .00 69635 V ALIGN .00 69639 V ALIGN .00 69826 V ALIGN .00 69833 V ALIGN .00 69842 V ALIGN .00 69856 V ALIGN .00 69863 V ALIGN .00 69867 V ALIGN .00 69870 V ALIGN .00 69894 V ALIGN .00 69915 V ALISHA HERRING 409.84 69093 ALISHA HERRING 240.16 69519 ALLIED THERAPY\u0026amp; CONSULTING 1,573.80 69493 - ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 5,313.41 68994 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 5,689.46 69992 ALLISON CALLAHAN 22.54 69531 T- 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT AMANDAC ROWDER AMANDAW ILSON AMERICA'S CHOICE INC AMERICANC OMPOSTINGIN C. AMERICANC OMPOSTINGIN C. AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO AMERICAN RED CROSS AMY VAN PELT AMY VOLLMAN ANDREA HAIN ANDREWC ALAWAY ANDRIA SMITH ANGELA GOVAN ANGIE COLCLASURE ANGIE JOHNSON ANN COWART ANNAN. VAMMEN ANTHONYC ANTRELL AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. APPLE COMPUTERIN C APSI ARCH FORD EDUCATIONS ERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATIONS ERVICE ARETHA ADAMS ARK-CRETE BLOCK CO. ARKANSASA CTE ARKANSASA CTE ARKANSASA LTACARE ARKANSASA SSOCIATIONO F PUPIL ARKANSASB AG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENTC O ARKANSASB AG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENTC O ARKANSASB AG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENTC O ARKANSASB AG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENTC O ARKANSASB USINESS PUBLISHING ARKANSASD EMOCRAGT AZETTE ARKANSASD EMOCRAGT AZETTE ARKANSASD EMOCRAGTA ZETTE ARKANSASD EPARTMENOTF ARKANSASD EPARTMENOTF HEALTH ARKANSASD EPT. OF EDUCATION ARKANSASE LECTROPAINTERSIN CNC ARKANSASE LECTROPAINTERSIN CNC ARKANSASE LECTROPAINTERSIN CNC T- 3 AMOUNT 1,376.09 200.00 40,000.00 38.62 38.62 2,601.50 2,601.50 2,551.50 2,551.50 2,501.50 2,501.50 250.00 360.00 183.26 40.91 92.00 103.19 41.15 27.26 79. 47 384.14 43.06 159.64 377.55 377.55 20,405.69 50.00 517. 28 14,106.87 34.52 663.97 105.00 100.00 51,471.00 60.00 189.74 277.19 126.31 220.12 890.00 112. 50 498.00 58.00 70.00 200.00 418,848.22 25,399.00 24,185.60 15,716.00 CHK. NO. 69725 69219 68977 69233 69738 68702 69118 69550 69563 69601 69614 69706 69148 69466 69062 69176 69506 69232 69722 69408 69215 69786 68989 69381 69921 68944 69450 V 68936 69665 69085 69648 69283 69797 70018 69223 69075 69306 69822 70071 69987 69132 69664 69937 69776 69244 70079 69227 70003 70004 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT ARKANSASE MPLOYMENSTE CURITYD ARKANSASF LAG \u0026amp; BANNER,I NC. ARKANSASL YMPHEDEM\u0026amp;A T HERAPY ARKANSASP ACKAGINGP RODUCTS, ARKANSASS PANISH INTERPRETER\u0026amp; ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT ARKANSASV OLUNTEERD IRECTION/ ARMATURE XCHANGE ARTIS LOFTON ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANYI,N C. ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANYI,N C. ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANYI,N C. ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANYI,N C. ASHLEY HANAN ASHLEY-WOODSO\u0026amp;N A SSOC. ASHLEY-WOODSO\u0026amp;N A SSOC. ASPA AUDIO EDITIONS BACKGROUNIDN FORMATIONSY STEMS BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES BAMM.COM BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL T- 4 AMOUNT 28,878.00 27.74 3,780.00 164.76 98.00 1,226.00 2,615.13 2,000.00 200.00 235.44 393.72 533.95 83.47 1,873.57 2,412.85 37.64 4,758.00 2,679.52 540.00 375.53 200.00 364.78 2,841.52 505,811.49 52,400.78 1,719.36 4,919.36 489,967.61 37,051.14 5,066.52 426,072.33 425,072.38 321,952.71 322,367.76 29,262.94 2,303.70 33,808.76 1,335,901.79 202,419.75 8,962.71 25,877.76 1,337,459.91 139,587.91 121.04 29,306.40 1,129,213.81 1,122,633.25 121.04 871,597.11 CHK. NO. 69134 69919 69436 69658 69053 69368 69832 69862 69268 69947 69772 68919 69378 69643 69917 69061 68975 69434 69027 69731 69131 69803 69755 68697 68732 68849 68914 69113 69314 69542 69546 69559 69597 69610 69624 69637 69865 68696 68731 68848 68913 69112 69313 69326 69541 69545 69558 69584 69596 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BARBARAB ROWN BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARRY KINCL BARRY KINCL BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BECKY WITCHER BEDFORDC AMERAA ND VIDEO BELWOODE LEMA CTIVITY FUND BEST BUY BETTY MORELAND BEVERLY KELSO BILL DUVALL BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BLUE BELL CREAMERIES, L.P. BOARD OF ELECTRICAL EXAMINERS BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBY ACKLIN BOBBY TRAFFANSTEDT BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BRAD BOLDING BRAD BOLDING BRAD BOLDING BRAINPOP.COMLLC BRANDYN ESSELRODT BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA PARKER BRENDAW ILLOUGHBY BRIAN HARVEY BRIAN NICHOLS BRIAN NICHOLS BRIAN NICHOLS BRIAN NICHOLS BRICKER PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC T- 5 AMOUNT 873,041.34 94,336.38 10,869.36 97.10 153,497.63 88.92 454.33 2,272.34 90.64 2,395.02 96.41 117.78 3,415.61 128.08 225.34 326.51 188.65 70.35 14.05 304.20 91.14 32.70 1,274.60 310.65 1,509.65 662.43 25.00 327.06 65.44 35.72 1,061.41 3,330.93 2,098.75 354.10 244.65 175.90 350.00 162.75 431.80 124.02 27.69 206.97 14.08 196.56 136.34 136.34 352.22 136.34 2,715.00 CHK. NO. 69609 69623 69636 69845 69864 69259 68924 69143 69655 69927 69650 69923 69141 69653 69457 69926 69775 62428 V 69084 70001 69388 68945 69681 69128 69379 69225 69644 70029 69996 68988 69146 69656 69930 69238 70014 70015 69673 69532 69273 69510 69789 69069 70049 69963 69572 69585 69835 69846 69445 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - JUNE 2007 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. BRIGETTA STARKS 130.00 69274 BRIGHT APPLE 464.54 69050 BROAD REACH 609.92 69153 BROOKE REYNOLDS 911. 00 69269 BROUKE REYNOLDS 41. 34 69270 V BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC. 400.76 69824 BUDGET OFFICE FURNITURE 1,207.56 69000 BUDS N BOWS 104.61 69142 BUDS N BOWS 62.12 69654 C.T.A. 10,779.92 69363 C.T.A. 10,783.99 69827 C.T.A. 9,171.42 69857 CABOT FLORISTS 114. 35 68929 CABOT FLORISTS 111. 62 69147 CABOT FLORISTS 50.09 69391 CABOT FLORISTS 60.99 69931 CAFFHANIE CALLOWAY 300.00 69470 CALLOWAYH OUSE, INC. 696.58 69149 CAMBIUML EARNINGI NC 7,419.77 69157 CAMBIUML EARNINGI NC 68,413.44 69940 - CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK 11.13 68727 CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK 10.00 69360 CAPITOL SERVICE COMPANY 206.01 69781 CAPSTONE PRESS 473.75 69200 CARLEX 725. 37 69764 CARLTON-BATESC O. 249.62 69392 CAROL THORNTON 116.14\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1762","title":"Court filings regarding Court order declaring the Little Rock School District (LRSD) unitary, letter seeking counsel's position, notice of electronic filing, and notice of docket correction re: motion for reconsideration.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2007-02/2007-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Education--Arkansas","Joshua intervenors","School districts","Little Rock School District","School integration","African Americans--Education","Education--Evaluation","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding Court order declaring the Little Rock School District (LRSD) unitary, letter seeking counsel's position, notice of electronic filing, and notice of docket correction re: motion for reconsideration."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1762"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["47 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, order declaring the Little Rock School District (LRSD) unitary; District Court, letter seeking counsel's position; District Court, two orders; District Court, notice of electronic filing, notice of docket correction re: motion for reconsideration    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2007 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITOR/NG PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ORDER DECLARING THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT UNIT ARY I. Introduction1 In early 1998, the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors2 (\"Joshua\") negotiated and voluntarily entered into the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan ( the \"Revised Plan\"),3 as a way of settling what was then over forty years of more or less continuous desegregation litigation.4 On April l 0, 1998, the Court approved the Revised Plan, 5 which required LRSD to substantially comply with hundreds of desegregation obligations in order to achieve unitary 11 once again note that United States Magistrate Judge Joe Thomas Ray has done a tremendous amount of work on this case throughout -- for which I am profoundly thankful. 2The Joshua Intervenors are a group of African-American school children, some of whom are enrolled in each of the three Pulaski County school districts. Thus, Joshua serves as the class representative for all African-American students enrolled in LRSD, the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\"), and the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\"). Joshua's Petition to Intervene in this action was granted on May 24, 1984. (Doc. No. 565.) 3Doc. No. 3107, Ex. A. 4The complete history of this desegregation litigation is set forth in LRSD v. PCSSD, et al., 237 F. Supp. 2d 988, 997-1020 (E.D. Ark. 2002) (\"LRSD I\"). 5Doc. No. 3144. status and release from court supervision.6 Many of these obligations go well beyond what either the United States Supreme Court or the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has held is constitutionally required in order for a school district to be deemed unitary. Nevertheless, by voluntarily entering into the Revised Plan, LRSD became contractually bound to satisfy all of the specified desegregation obligations. 7 Since the meaning of some of the terms of the Revised Plan were questioned by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in its 2006 decision,8 I quote, as background for the following discussion, the Restatement of Contracts: ( l) Where the parties have attached the same meaning to a promise or agreement or a term thereof, it is interpreted in accordance with that meaning.9 A. LRSD's March 15, 2001 Application for Unitary Status On March 15, 200 l, LRSD moved for unitary status on the ground that it had substantially complied with all of the obligations in the Revised Plan.10 On June 25, 2001, Joshua filed an Opposition to LRSD's Compliance Report11 which argued that LRSD was not in substantial compliance with most of the obligations in the Revised Plan. On March 15, 2002, LRSD filed a 6The Eighth Circuit has repeatedly recognized that the Revised Plan represents a settlement agreement which contractually obligates LRSD to fulfill the specified desegregation obligations. LRSD v. PCSSD, 83 F.3d 1013, 1017 (8th Cir. 1996). In Knight v. PCSSD, 112 F.3d 953, 955 (8th Cir. 1997), the Court characterized the settlement agreement as \"a particularization of federal [desegregation] law applicable to these parties.\" 1LRSD v. PCSSD, 83 F.3d 103, 1017 (8th Cir. 1996). 8LRSD v. NLRSD, et al., 451 F.3d 528 (8th Cir. 2006). 9RESTATEMENT(SECOND)OFCONTRACTS  201 (1981). 10Doc. No. 3410. 11Doc. No. 3447. -2- Motion for an Immediate Declaration of Unitary Status. 12 On May 30, 2002, Joshua filed a Response13 opposing that Motion. I conducted a series of unitary status hearings during the second half of 2001 and the first half of 2002. During these hearings, over forty witnesses testified, and the parties introduced into evidence thousands of pages of exhibits. On September I 3, 2002, I entered a Memorandum Opinion ( the \"September 2002 Decision\") finding that LRSD had substantially complied with all of its obligations in the Revised Plan except those specified in 2.7.1. 14 Section 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan obligated LRSD to satisfy the following obligations: LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to  2. 7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving African-American achievements. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve African-American achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. 15 I found that, while LRSD had implemented numerous  2. 7 programs designed to improve the academic achievement of African-American students, the evidence established that it had done very little to assess the effectiveness of those programs, on a year-to-year basis, as required by  2. 7 .1 . The Findings of Fact in LRSD I discussed the substantial evidence which revealed that LRSD' stop administrators and Joshua both construed 2. 7 .1 's requirement that LRSD \"shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to 2.7 after each year\" to mean that LRSD must 12Doc. No. 3580. 13Doc. No. 3604. 14LRSD I, 237 F. Supp. 2d 988. 15Doc. No. 3107, Ex. A -3- perform \"program assessments\" and \"program evaluations.\" 16 Witnesses for LRSD and Joshua testified that both parties understood the term \"assess,\" as used in 2.7.l, to be a term of art requiring LRSD to prepare annual assessments and evaluations of the 2. 7 programs. While 2. 7. l does not mention the word \"evaluation,\" the evidence established beyond peradventure that LRSD clearly understood that its obligation to assess the 2.7 programs required it to prepare not only program assessments but also program evaluations in order to determine the effectiveness of those programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. B. The 2002 Compliance Remedy In subpart A of the 2002 Memorandum Opinion, I tracked the language the parties used in  2. 7 .1 and required LRSD to assess each of the programs implemented under 2. 7 to improve the academic achievement of African-American students during the entire 2002-03 school year and the - first semester of the 2003-04 school year. I did not spell out that LRSD was required to prepare evaluations of specific 2. 7 programs because the testimony of the parties during the 2002 unitary status hearing made it clear that they understood the term \"assess\" to include both assessments and evaluations of the  2. 7 programs. Therefore, to comply with subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy, LRSD was expected to continue to prepare program assessments and to prepare program evaluations of the most promising  2. 7 programs that it planned to implement during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year. Subpart B required LRSD to maintain written records documenting how it had gone about assessing the 2.7 programs. 16LRSD I, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1076-77. (\"Not to put too fine a point on it\", but since there appears to be some confusion about the required \"evaluations\", this order will be quite redundant on this point). -4- Subpart C required LRSD to complete and file program evaluations on the fourteen  2. 7 programs listed on page 148 ofLRSD' s Final Compliance Report. This Final Compliance Report, 17 filed on March 15, 200 l, detailed everything that LRSD had done to meet its compliance obligations under each section of the Revised Plan. Importantly, this Final Compliance Report reflects precisely how LRSD construed its desegregation obligations under each section of the Revised Plan. On page 148, under the heading \"Section H Program Evaluation,\" LRSD cited \"Section 2.7.l\" as creating the obligation to prepare fourteen program evaluations of 2. 7 programs. Since 1998, Dr. Steven Ross has worked extensively with PRE to improve the program evaluation process. LRSD accepted his recommendation and hired Dr. John Nunnery, who was supposed to prepare most of the evaluations of the fourteen specifically identified  2. 7 programs. 18 In the March 15, 2002 Final Compliance Report, LRSD unequivocally admits that it knew, understood, and construed the obligation in 2.7.l to assess the 2.7 programs as requiring it to prepare evaluations of some of the  2. 7 programs. 19 In the Final Compliance Report, LRSD stated that, as of March 15, 200 I, PRE20 staff and Dr. Nunnery had prepared evaluations on all fourteen of the 2. 7 programs identified on page 148. During the 2002 unitary status hearings, however, LRSD administrators admitted that only six of the fourteen evaluations actually had been completed. These fourteen evaluations of specific  2. 7 programs were supposed to have been prepared during the 1999, 2000, and 2001 school years (at 17Doc. No. 3410. 18See LRSD's Final Compliance Report at page 148 (Doc. No. 3410). 19Consistent with LRSD's explicit acknowledgment of this obligation in subpart Hof the Final Compliance Report, Dr. Bonnie Lesley and other top LRSD administrators testified during the 2002 unitary status hearing that they understood 2.7. l's obligation to assess the 2.7 programs as requiring LRSD to perform annual evaluations of some of the  2. 7 programs. 20PRE stands for Planning, Research, and Evaluation. -5- the rate of approximately four per year) using testing and p e,formance data generated during those three school years. Subpart C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to prepare the eight missing program evaluations from the three previous school years. Everyone understood that, in preparing these evaluations, LRSD would use student testing and performance data from the 1999 through 2001 school years to determine the effectiveness of those 2.7 programs during those school years. Thus, subpart C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to catch up on the annual  2. 7 program evaluations, for the previous three years, which the Final Compliance Report erroneously stated LRSD had already prepared. So, subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to prepare assessments and evaluations of 2. 7 programs during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year. Because subpart C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to prepare - evaluations of 2. 7 programs to determine their effectiveness in school years before the 2002-03 school year, everyone understood that the eight page-148 program evaluations required in subpart C could not be used by LRSD to satisfy the program evaluation obligation in subpart A, which required it to prepare evaluations of the  2. 7 programs during the 2002-03 school year and the first six months of the 2003-04 school year.21 On the record this admits ofno doubt. Finally, LRSD was given until March 15, 2004, to demonstrate that it was in substantial compliance with  2. 7. l, as outlined in subparts A, B, and C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. 22 21This explains why, after it prepared the eight evaluations required by subpart C, LRSD proceeded to prepare two global evaluations of its Literacy and Math and Science curricula for the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 school year. These two global evaluations were clearly intended to satisfy LRSD's obligation under subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. 22LRSD I. 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1087-88. -6- C. The Eighth Circuit Affirms the September 2002 Decision Joshua appealed the September 2002 Decision to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. On March 2, 2004, the Court entered an opinion affirming the September 2002 Decision.23 Because LRSD did not cross-appeal, it gave up any right to complain about the obligations imposed on it in subparts A, B, and C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. D. LRSD's March 12, 2004 Application for Unitary Status On March 12, 2004, LRSD filed a Compliance Report24 seeking unitary status on the ground that it had substantially complied with 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and subparts A, B, and C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. On April 15, 2004, Joshua filed papers25 opposing LRSD's request for unitary status. On June 14 and 15, 2004, a unitary status hearing was held. During this hearing, it was revealed that, shortly after I entered the 2002 Compliance Remedy, numerous top LRSD administrators had resigned, including the Superintendent; Dr. Bonnie Lesley, the Associated Superintendent in charge of Curriculum and Education; and most of the rest of the employees in the PRE Department. LRSD' s remaining administrators testified at the hearing that because of this mass exodus they were unsure about how LRSD should go about satisfying subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. This was not brought to my attention until the 2004 hearing. Inexplicably, LRSD decided it could satisfy subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy by preparing two \"global evaluations\" ofLRSD's Literacy Curriculum and its Math and Science Curriculum. As previously mentioned, subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy used the same language contained in  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan, and required LRSD to assess the  2. 7 23LRSD v. Armstrong, 359 F.3d 957 (8th Cir. 2004). 24Doc. No. 3837. 25Doc. Nos. 3856 and 3857. -7- programs.26 After the September 2002 Decision, LRSD's administrators decided the obligation to assess  2.7 programs could be satisfied by preparing only two \"global evaluations\" of LRSD's Literacy curriculum and Math and Science curriculum. This establishes clearly that LRSD construed the phrase \"assess 2. 7 programs, \"as used in 2. 7.1, to mean that it was required to prepare program evaluations -- not just program assessments. On June 30, 2004, I entered a Memorandum Opinion (the \"June 2004 Decision\"), holding that these two global evaluations fell far short of 2.7.1 's requirement that LRSD must annually assess specific  2. 7 programs in order to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students.27 The best way to understand the shortcomings of LRSD's \"global approach\" to complying with 2.7.1 is through a concrete example of what the plain language of 2. 7 .1 and subpart A of the Compliance Remedy actually obligated LRSD to do. During the 2002-03 and 2003-04 school years, LRSD implemented numerous 2. 7 programs to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. One such program, which was implemented in elementary schools throughout the district, was the Pre-K Literacy Program. During the 2002 and 2004 unitary status hearings, testimony established that the Pre-K Literacy Program was one ofLRSD's most promising 2.7 programs. IfLRSD had hired Dr. Ross or some other similarly qualified consultant to perform evaluations of the Pre-K Literacy program and three orfour other specific 2.7 programs, during the 2002-03 school year and the first semester of the 2003-04 26During the 2002 unitary status hearing, LRSD' s witnesses made it clear that they knew and understood the word \"assess,\" as it was used in  2.7.1, to mean that LRSD must prepare assessments and evaluations as part of its obligation to \"assess\" the  2. 7 programs. This is also precisely how LRSD had construed its obligation under 2. 7 .1 in the years following its execution of the Revised Plan in 1998, as evidenced by page 148 ofLRSD's Final Compliance Report filed on March 15, 2001. Thus, I felt sure LRSD understood that the obligation to assess the  2.7 programs meant that it must prepare both assessments and evaluations of specific  2. 7 programs. 21LRSD v. PCSSD, eta/., No. 4:82CV00866, 2004 WL 5187587 (E.D. Ark. June 30, 2004) (\"LRSD If'). -8- school year, I would have had no difficulty finding that it had substantially complied with the program evaluation obligation contained in  2. 7. l and subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. Instead of evaluating specific  2.7 programs, however, LRSD's administrators tried to satisfy 2.7. l by hiring Dr. Ross and another outside consultant to perform \"global evaluations\" of LRSD's overall Literacy Curriculum and its Math and Science Curriculum. These evaluations amounted to nothing more than a survey of LRSD's complete program curricula in the areas of literacy, math, and science. Neither evaluation attempted to address the effectiveness of any of the specific 2.7 programs implemented to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. As a result, these global evaluations provided no usefal guidance on how any of the specific  2. 7 programs were working to improve African-American achievement. During the June 2004 evidentiary hearing, Dr. Ross, himself, (and the other experts who prepared the two global - evaluations) admitted that these \"step l\" global evaluations did not satisfy the plain language of 2.7.1 (which, as noted above, required LRSD to prepare \"step 2\" evaluations of specific  2.7 programs to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students). As was set forth in the June 2004 Decision, the obligations in 2.7. l go to the very heart of what Joshua contracted to receive from LRSD in agreeing to the Revised Plan: It is impossible to overstate the importance of 2.7.1 to LRSD's African-American students. Unless something is done to improve their academic achievement, many of them, who do not possess proficient skills in reading and math, will face difficult and uncertain futures. Because 70% of its students are African-American, LRSD should be devoting a substantial percentage of its educational resources to solving this crucially important problem that will burden the lives and career trajectories of so many of its students. It is my fervent hope that LRSD's administrators and its Board realize that LRSD must make the long-term commitment to solve this problem, not because a federal court says that it must, but because it is the right thing to do.28 28LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *20 (emphasis in original). -9- Based on the evidence introduced during the evidentiary hearing on June 14 and 15, 2004, I was at a loss to understand how LRSD could have concluded that the two \"global evaluations\" substantially complied with  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. Accordingly, I denied LRSD's request for unitary status.29 During the June 14 and 15, 2004 unitary status hearing, LRSD administrators complained that, because subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy did not spell out precisely what they were supposed to do to satisfy the obligations in  2. 7 .1, they were unsure of how to proceed. I was puzzled by this professed confusion so, to avoid any future confusion about what the language in  2.7. l required, the 2004 Compliance Remedy spelled out the specific obligations that LRSD must meet in order to satisfy the requirements of 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan.30 However, I did so with some reluctance and only because I was genuinely concerned that, unless I restated those obligations in very specific terms, LRSD might once again fail to substantially comply with 2.7.1: In the (2002) Compliance Remedy, I was reluctant to set forth too much detail about how LRSD should structure its program assessment process. Professional educators ought to be able to do a better job than I could in formulating and implementing this process; but LRSD is found wanting in its handling of its duties under subparts A and B of the Compliance Remedy.31 E. The Eighth Circuit Affirms the June 2004 Decision LRSD appealed the June 2004 Decision to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ironically, on appeal, LRSD argued, among other things, that the 2004 Compliance Remedy was too specific and imposed obligations that went beyond what it had agreed to do under  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan. On June 26, 2006, the Eighth Circuit entered its opinion affirming the June 2004 Decision.32 29/d at **20-29. 30/d. at **32-35. 31/d. at *22. 32LRSD v. NLRSD, et al., 451 F.3d 528 (8th Cir. 2006). -10- However, both the majority and dissent expressed concern that some aspects of the 2004 Compliance Remedy may have gone beyond the obligations LRSD agreed to undertake in  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan. F. LRSD's October 16, 2006 Application for Unitary Status On October 16, 2006, LRSD filed a Compliance Report33 detailing everything that it has done to satisfy the 2004 Compliance Remedy and  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan. LRSD asserts that, because it has now substantially complied with the 2004 Compliance Remedy, it should be declared unitary and released from court supervision and monitoring. On November 16, 2006, Joshua filed Objections to LRSD's Compliance Report and Opposition to LRSD's Request for Unitary Status.34 On January 20, 21, and 27, 2007, I conducted another unitary status hearing. LRSD called fifteen witnesses who testified about LRSD's substantial compliance with 2.7.1 of the Revised - Plan, as those obligations are contained in the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Joshua called nineteen witnesses who testified that LRSD needed to do more still in order to comply with its obligations. The parties again introduced into evidence thousands of pages of exhibits. Because the Eighth Circuit's recently expressed concerns about whether the 2004 Compliance Remedy imposed obligations on LRSD that went beyond those contained in  2. 7 .1, I believe it is important for me to address that issue before I reach the merits of LRSD' s substantial compliance. 33Doc. No. 4050. 34Doc. No. 4058. - ------ -11- II. LRSD's Obligations Under The 2004 Compliance Remedy And Why It Was Required By 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan A. LRSD Must Reestablish Its PRE Department As previously discussed, between mid-2002 and June of 2004, LRSD allowed its PRE Department to collapse.35 During the June 2004 unitary status hearing, Mr. Dennis Glasgow, who in June of 2003 was appointed Interim Associate Superintendent of Instruction and Curriculum to replace Dr. Lesley, testified that: PRE was short of personnel . .. and ... he intended to propose to the Board that it set a high priority on hiring a team of well qualified and experienced professionals capable of reinvigorating PRE. 36 In section A of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, I required LRSD to hire the well qualified and experienced team of professionals that according to Mr. Glasgow was necessary to reestablish an effective PRE Department. I required that this group of professionals include: (1) a director comparable to former director Dr. Lease, someone who hac:l a Ph.D. and experience in designing, preparing, and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations, and in formulating a comprehensive program assessment process to determine the effectiveness of the  2. 7 programs 35Dr. Kathy Lease, the director of PRE, left LRSD in the fall of 2002. Three statisticians and several other support staff left PRE in 2002 and 2003. None of these employees had been replaced at the time I conducted the June 2004 unitary status hearing. At that time, PRE was being run by one statistician, who had no real experience in performing program assessments or preparing program evaluations. Dr. Bonnie Lesley, LRSD's Associate Superintendent oflnstruction and Curriculum, who had considerable knowledge and experience with the program assessment and evaluation process, left LRSD in 2003. She was replaced, on an interim basis, by Dennis Glasgow, who had almost no experience with the program assessment and program evaluation process. LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *21. In LRSD II, I found that the collapse of the PRE Department explained in large part why LRSD's remaining administrators, who had little knowledge about the program assessment and evaluation process, mistakenly determined that two global evaluations ofLRSD's overall program curriculum could somehow satisfy the obligations in  2. 7 .1, which required LRSD to evaluate specific 2. 7 programs. For a complete discussion of how LRSD allowed the PRE Department to - fallapart,seeLRSDiat 1077-81 andLRSD//,2004 WL5187587,at**9-10, *21. 36LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *21. -12- designed to improve the academic achievement of African-American students; (2) experienced statisticians like those who had worked under Dr. Lease; and (3) other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate an effective PRE Department. As indicated above, Section 2.7.1 required LRSD to assess, on an annual basis, the 2.7 programs to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. And, as I have previously explained, LRSD and Joshua both interpreted the term assess in 2.7.1 to be a termofartthatrequired LRSD to perform annual program assessments and program evaluations of the 2.7 programs to determine their effectiveness.37 Finally, this is precisely how LRSD construed 2.7.1, as evidenced by page 148 of the March 15, 2001 Final Compliance Report and in its decision to prepare two global evaluations to satisfy subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy.38 37During the 2002 unitary status hearing, Dr. Lesley's testimony made it very clear that LRSD and Joshua both knew the definitions of and distinctions between a \"program assessment\" and a \"program evaluation.\" Dr. Lesley defined a program assessment as something that is \"dynamic, it is interactive, it's ongoing, it happens frequently, and it is a measurement, along with the analysis that you would make of whatever results are available.\" LRSD I, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1077. In contrast, she defined a program evaluation as \"more long term, it may consider observations or measurements in addition to test scores, and is guided by a set of research questions that are usually provided by whoever the consumer is of that report.\" Id. In LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *2, I summarized the distinction Dr. Lesley made between a program assessment and a program evaluation as follows: [A] program assessment is a relatively informal process that may not result in much documentation, while a program evaluation is a formal process that always involves the preparation of an often lengthy written program evaluation which is centered around carefully prepared research questions that the evaluation is designed to answer. 381n the Eighth Circuit's June 26, 2006 decision, neither the majority nor the dissent addressed the undisputed fact that LRSD and Joshua have always interpreted the word \"assess,\" as used in  2. 7 .1, to mean that LRSD must perform both informal program assessments and the far more rigorous program evaluations in order to determine the effectiveness of 2.7 programs. As a result, the panel erroneously construed  2.7.1 as requiring LRSD to perform program only assessments -- not evaluations -- of the 2.7 programs. LRSD v. NLRSD, 451 F.3d 528, 536-37 (majority), 542 (dissent). In the same vein, the Eighth Circuit suggested that \"this litigation has been complicated by -13- Similarly, while nothing in the Revised Plan explicitly required LRSD to have a PRE Department, it appears that it would have been impossible for LRSD to discharge its program assessment and program evaluation obligations under 2. 7 .1 without one. By the time of the 2004 unitary status hearing, LRSD's PRE Department was no longer functioning and had only one employee, a statistician. By ordering LRSD to reestablish its PRE Department with an experienced and qualified staff, I was requiring LRSD only to restore the status quo ante regarding PRE the shifting terminology employed by LRSD, Joshua, and the district court\" in the use of the terms \"assessment,\" \"evaluation,\" \"program\" and \"key program.\" LRSD v. NLRSD, 451 F.3d at 531-536. I respectfully disagree. From the first unitary status hearings in 2002, LRSD, Joshua, and I have all understood exactly what the term \"assess\" means in 2. 7.1. We all know that this term, which is a term of art, required LRSD to perform both assessments and evaluations of the 2.7 programs. Similarly, we all understand what a 2. 7 program is and which of the 2. 7 programs are the key or most important programs. When I required LRSD to \"assess\" the  2. 7 programs in subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy, LRSD, Joshua, and I all understood this would require LRSD to prepare assessments of many of the 2.7 programs and evaluations of some of the most important 2.7 programs. This explains why LRSD construed subpart A of the Compliance Remedy, which mentioned nothing about program evaluations and required LRSD only to \"assess\" the  2. 7 programs, to mean that it must prepare two global evaluations. During the 2004 unitary status hearing, Dr. Lesley back-tracked from her earlier testimony in the 2002 unitary status hearing and stated that she did not believe 2.7.1 and subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to perform any evaluation of the  2.7 programs. However, she could provide no explanation for why, if she was correct, LRSD had expended hundreds of thousands of dollars to perform evaluations of the 2. 7 programs in order to satisfy its obligations under 2.7.1 as documented in the March 15, 2001 Final Compliance Report and the March 12, 2004 Application for Unitary Status. Finally, Dr. Ross offered compelling testimony explaining why, as a long time consultant to LRSD, he and top LRSD administrators had always construed 2.7.1 's obligations \"to assess the 2.7 programs\" as requiring LRSD also to prepare evaluations of those programs. LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *27. As the finder of fact in the 2004 unitary status hearing, I had an opportunity to closely observe Dr. Lesley and to assess her credibility. In my 2004 Findings of Fact, I stated the following: I do not put much stock in Dr. Lesley's testimony at this last hearing. (Her testimony in the unitary status hearings in 2002 was quite helpful.) Her answers to pointed questions were often indirect and marked by semantics. I got the distinct impression that she wanted to avoid giving answers that would be harmful to LRSD's position. Since I found Dr. Lesley's testimony on this point was not to credible, there is no evidence in either the 2002 or 2004 unitary status hearing to support the notion that 2. 7 .1 required LRSD to perform only program assessments. On the other hand, there is a mountain of evidence which establishes that both LRSD and Joshua have always interpreted \"assess,\" as it was used in  2. 7 .1, to be a term of art that required LRSD to perform program assessments and program evaluations. -14- Department staffing and operations -- something that was essential ifLRSD ever expected to meet its obligations under  2.7. l. I do not believe that section A of the 2004 Compliance Remedy imposed a single new obligation on LRSD that was not part of what it originally agreed to do in order to discharge its obligations under 2.7.l of the Revised Plan.39 I hark back to  201 of the Restatement of Contracts quoted in the introduction. B. LRSD Must Create and \"Deeply Embed\" a Comprehensive Program Assessment Process Section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, required LRSD to use its PRE Department, in consultation with Dr. Ross, to devise a \"comprehensive program assessment process\" and then to \"deeply embed\" that process as a permanent part ofLRSD's curriculum and instruction program. I defined \"comprehensive program assessment process\" to mean and include both \"formal evaluations\" of key 2.7 programs and \"informal program assessments.',40 During the June 2004 unitary status hearing, LRSD witnesses testified that, each school year, LRSD implemented numerous  2. 7 programs to improve the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. Some of those programs were pilot projects that were only offered at one school to a relatively small number of students. Other  2. 7 programs had been used for several years in numerous schools and were regarded as key  2. 7 programs that appeared to offer the most promise in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. The testimony during the 39lnLRSD v. NLRSD, 451 F.3d at 542, the dissent characterized my requiring LRSD to hire a new team for PRE as a \"significant abuse of discretion.\" Based on the entire record -- which reflects the clear, abiding understanding of the parties before the 2004 hearing -- I do not agree. 401n LRSD II, I explained that \"[t]he comprehensive program assessment process must include formal step 2 evaluations of certain key  2.7 programs ... [and] preparing informal program assessments that involve interviews with teachers, informal evaluations oftest scores, and the other things normally associated with the more dynamic program assessment process.\" LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *32. Thus, in requiring LRSD to devise and implement a comprehensive program assessment process, section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy merely spelled out for LRSD what it knew and understood  2. 7 .1 to mean. -15- June 2004 unitary status hearing made it clear that LRSD and Joshua both had a good understanding what the key  2. 7 programs were. I do not believe that requiring LRSD to evaluate only key  2. 7 programs is a new obligation under 2.7. l, especially since LRSD had been performing annual evaluations on its most important or key  2. 7 programs since it entered the Revised Plan in 1998. The dissent in LRSD v. NLRSD, et al. 41 discussed at length the reasons why requiring LRSD to \"deeply embed\" its program assessment process as a permanent part ofLRSD's curriculum and instruction program imposed a new contractual obligation on LRSD that was not contained in  2. 7. I. of the Revised Plan. The dissent pointed out that: (I) I did not \"identify any objective standards by which [I intended] to measure whether LRSD had succeeded in meeting this \"deeply embedded\" requirement\"; (2) the \"deeply embedded\" requirement was \"impossibly subjective\"; and (3) I created \"the unworkably subjective 'deeply embedded' standard . .. out of whole cloth in the 2004 Remedy.\"42 Upon mature reflection, I wholeheartedly agree with the dissent's criticism ofmy decision to require LRSD to \"deeply embed\" the program assessment process as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. Section 2. 7.1 of the Revised Plan and subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy required LRSD to create and implement a program assessment process capable of allowing it to prepare annual program assessments and program evaluations of the  2.7 programs as a way of determining the effectiveness of those programs in imposing the academic achievement of African-American students. Nothing in either  2.7.1 or the 2002 Compliance Remedy can fairly be construed to mean that LRSD must \"deeply embed\" the program assessment 41451 F.3d at 541-543. 42/d. at 542-43. -16- process as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. 43 Additionally, as the dissent points out, trying to apply an entirely subjective \"deeply embedded\" standard is a bridge too far -like trying to reach the mirage in the desert. In 2.1 of the Revised Plan, LRSD agreed to act in \"good faith\": LRSD shall in good faith exercise its best efforts to comply with the Constitution, to remedy the effects of past discrimination by LRSD against African-American students, to ensure that no person is discriminated against on the basis of race, color, or ethnicity in the operations of LRSD and to provide an equal educational opportunity for all students attending LRSD schools.44 In the 2002 Memorandum Opinion, I found that, in the areas in which LRSD was held to be unitary, it had \"complied with its obligations under 2.1 of the Revised Plan and that, in the future, it could be trusted to follow the Covenants and the Constitution.\"45 I now realize that, in section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, I should have adopted the - \"good faith\" compliance standard imposed under 2.1, rather than crafting a \"deeply embedded\" compliance standard \"out of whole cloth.\"46 The language I should have used in section B, rather than the \"deeply embedded\" standard, is as follows: LRSD must act in good faith (as explicitly required by  2.1 of the Revised Plan) to implement the program assessment process required by  2.7.1 of the RevisedPlan.47 In the Findings ofFact, I will use this \"good faith\" compliance standard 43In hindsight, I probably imposed this new obligation on LRSD because I believe it is so important for LRSD to honor the commitment it made in  2. 7 and  2. 7 .1. Of course, my personal feelings are irrelevant with respect to the plain meaning of 2. 7 .1. 44Doc. No. 3107, Ex. A. 45LRSD I, 237 F. Supp. 2d at 1046. 46LRSD v. NLRSD, 451 F.3d at 542. 47While I have acknowledged my error in imposing on LRSD the \"deeply embedded\" obligation, I hope LRSD realizes the need for making the program assessment process a permanent part of its curriculum -- not because a federal judge thought it was a good idea, but because it is the right thing to do to help improve the academic achievement. -17- to determine whether LRSD has substantially complied with section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, rather than the \"deeply embedded\" compliance standard contained in the June 2004 Decision. C. LRSD Must Prepare Eight Evaluations of Key  2. 7 Programs Over Two Academic School Years (2004-05 and 2005-06) As I have previously explained, on March 15, 2002, a number of months before I began the 2002 unitary status hearing, LRSD filed a Final Compliance Report which documented everything it had done to satisfy all of the obligations in the Revised Plan. On page 148 of that document, LRSD stated that, over the last three years, it had prepared program evaluations on fourteen specifically identified 2.7 programs to satisfy part of its obligations under 2.7.1. However, during the subsequent unitary status hearing, testimony established that, by June 1, 2002, LRSD had prepared only six of the fourteen program evaluations. Once again, it is important to remember that LRSD' s 2002 Final Compliance Report set forth the things LRSD had done to substantially comply with its understanding of the obligations in the Revised Plan. Page 148 of that document makes it crystal clear that LRSD construed 2.7.l 's obligation to assess the 2. 7 programs as requiring it to prepare fourteen program evaluations, over three school years (1999 through 2001). To comply with its own interpretation of 2.7. l , LRSD should have prepared approximately four program evaluations during each of those three years.48 481n subpart C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy, I required LRSD to prepare the eight missing evaluations of the specifically identified 2. 7 programs using testing and performance data generated during the three previous school years when LRSD should have prepared those evaluations. Contrary to the Eighth Circuit's characterization of subparts A and C of the 2002 Compliance Remedy, there was nothing \"bifurcated\" or inconsistent about those respective remedies, both of which were based on the identical interpretation ofLRSD's obligations under 2.7.l of the Revised Plan. LRSD v. NLRSD, 451 F.3d at 536. Similarly, there is nothing in the record from the 2002 and 2004 unitary status hearings which supports the Eighth Circuit's statement that: \"Subpart C of the 2002 Remedy exceeded the scope of the Revised Plan, which lacked any requirement for program evaluations.\" Id. at 537. -18- In the 2004 unitary status hearing, Dr. Ross testified that he believed a school district the size of LRSD should be expected to prepare four or five  2. 7 programs evaluations each year in order to comply with its 2.7.l obligation to assess the effectiveness of the 2.7 programs. This number of annual program evaluations coincided almost exactly with the average number of annual program evaluations LRSD had earlier determined that it was required to prepare, over the 1999 to 2001 school years, in order to comply with its obligations under 2. 7. l .49 Using LRSD's own construction of the number of program evaluations it should prepare each year to satisfy its obligations under 2.7.1, I specified in section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy that LRSD must prepare program evaluations on four key 2. 7 programs during both the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. Thus, section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy did not impose any obligations on LRSD that were not contained in 2. 7 .1, as LRSD had construed and attempted - to implement those obligations since the time it agreed to the Revised Plan in 1998. Rather, it only required LRSD to prepare the same number of annual evaluations of 2.7 programs that: (1) it believed it was required to prepare in order to satisfy its own understanding of its obligation under  2.7.1, as acknowledged on page 148 ofLRSD's 2002 Final Compliance Report; and (2) its own long-time consultant testified was reasonable for a school district the size ofLRSD. Finally, I suggested that LRSD use Dr. Ross to prepare as many of the eight evaluations as possible. As I pointed out in the 2004 Memorandum Opinion, a number of years ago, Joshua agreed, in writing, that Dr. Ross possessed the qualifications necessary to prepare program evaluations and to act as a consultant for LRSD in its efforts to comply with its obligations under the Revised Plan. 50 Since that time, LRSD has regularly used the services of Dr. Ross, and he is thoroughly familiar with LRSD's compliance efforts under the Revised Plan. I suggested that LRSD continue to use 49See page 148 ofLRSD's March 15, 2002 Final Compliance Report (Doc. No. 3410). 50LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *9. -19- Dr. Ross only because I was concerned that, if LRSD selected another consultant to prepare the program evaluations, Joshua would challenge the new consultant's qualifications, and I would be required to referee another contentious dispute. D. The General Organization and Content of the Eight Program Evaluations During the June 2004 unitary status hearing, the parties introduced into evidence Regulation IL-Rl , which the LRSD Board of Directors approved shortly after I filed the September 2002 Decision. Regulation IL-Rl established the criteria that LRSD developed and agreed to follow in preparing the program evaluations necessary to satisfy its obligations under subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy.51 Section D of the 2004 Compliance Remedy contains obligations that I took directly from Regulation IL-Rl. LRSD voluntarily adopted Regulation IL-Rl to govern the organization and content of the program evaluations it prepared to satisfy  2.7.l and subpart A of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. In section D of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, I incorporated most of the requirements in Regulation IL-RI. 52 In doing so, there were no new obligations imposed on LRSD that went beyond what it had already agreed was required to do. E. Record Keeping Obligations As a way of relieving LRSD of the record keeping obligations in subpart B of the 2002 Compliance Remedy, section E of the 2004 Compliance Remedy required the outside consultants who were selected to prepare the eight  2.7 program evaluations to discharge all of the record keeping obligations that were previously imposed on LRSD. Obviously, nothing in section E imposed any new contractual obligations on LRSD. 51LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *7. 52On December 16, 2004, LRSD replaced Regulation IL-RI with Regulation IL-R. As will be discussed later, Regulation IL-Risa significant improvement over Regulation IL-Rl. -20- F. Obligation to Keep ODM and Joshua Informed Section F required LRSD to provide the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") and Joshua: (I) with the names of the eight  2.7 programs that PRE and Dr. Ross selected for evaluation; and (2) a copy of the comprehensive program assessment process adopted by LRSD's Board of Directors. Numerous sections of the Revised Plan obligated LRSD to keep ODM and Joshua informed of its progress in complying with its desegregation obligations. Section F merely continued that policy, without imposing any new obligations on LRSD. G. The Role of ODM Section H reiterated ODM's role in assisting LRSD to meet its obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy. The Eighth Circuit ordered the creation ofODM and charged it with the duty of monitoring and assisting the three Pulaski County school districts to meet their respective - desegregation obligations. There is nothing in section H that imposed any new obligations on LRSD. H. The Role of Joshua In section I, I restated that Joshua was expected \"to fulfill its traditional role of monitoring LRSD's compliance obligations.\" There is nothing in section I that imposed any new obligations. I. Deadlines for Filing Program Evaluations Section J required LRSD to file the four program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year no later than October I, 2005. The four program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year were required to be filed no later than October I, 2006. J. Deadline for Filing Compliance Report Section K gave LRSD until October 15, 2006, to file its Compliance Report \"documenting its compliance with its obligations under 2. 7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy.\" -21- K. No New Obligations In this section, I made it clear that the 2004 Compliance Remedy was not intended to impose any new obligations on LRSD but only to state with greater specificity the obligations I thought LRSD understood it was required to meet in order to satisfy subparts A and B of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. Because of the Eighth Circuit's concerns about the scope of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, I believe this section deserves to be quoted in full: L. This Compliance Remedy is intended to supersede and replace the identical compliance obligations that I imposed on LRSD, albeit with less specificity, in subparts A and B of Section VIl of the September 13 [2002] Decision.53 As I have previously acknowledged, section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy added a significant new obligation, not found in 2.7.1 or the 2002 Compliance Remedy, which required LRSD to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part of its - curriculum and instruction program. However, with that exception, I am satisfied that the remainder of the 2004 Compliance Remedy fairly met LRSD 's request that I specify in greater detail the obligations that LRSD and Joshua both knew and understood to be contained in 2. 7 .1 and subparts A and B of the 2002 Compliance Remedy. III. Findings Of Fact And Conclusions of Law A. Burden of Proof l. In my Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the June 30, 2004 Order,54 I explained why LRSD had the burden of proving its substantial compliance with the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 53LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *33 (emphasis added). 54LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *19. -22- 2. I incorporate and adopt my previous analysis of the burden of proof issue inLRSD II as my conclusion of law on that point for purposes of the current unitary status hearing. B. LRSD's Substantial Compliance with Each Section of the 2004 Compliance Remedy 1. Section A: Hire a Team of Professionals to Reinvigorate PRE 1. After I entered the June 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD acted in a timely manner to hire a highly qualified director of PRE, as well as three statisticians, two testing assistants, and a full time secretary. Dr. Sharon DeJarnette, the new director of PRE, obtained her masters degree from Columbia University and her Ph.D. from UCLA. The topic of her dissertation was the preparation and use of program assessments to gauge the progress of English language learners. Prior to being hired by LRSD, she had over five years of experience preparing program evaluations of comprehensive school improvement programs as the Research Director for the Galef Institute. 2. During the January 2007 unitary status hearings, I heard testimony from Dr. DeJarnette and three statisticians in PRE, Dr. Ed Williams, Ms. Mareso Robinson, and Mr. Jim Wohlleb. All four of these employees were knowledgeable, competent, and well educated, with considerable training and experience in statistics. All four of these employees were also quite knowledgeable about preparing and using assessments and evaluations to determine the effectiveness of academic programs designed to improve the academic achievement of students. 3. Dr. DeJamette began working as the director of PRE in October of 2004. In December, mandatory downsizing of all of LRSD' s administrative departments caused her to lose her secretary. Additionally, one of her testing coordinators left for a position in the PCSSD. Because these positions remained vacant for several months, Dr. DeJamette complained that it was harder for PRE to perform its work and forced the remaining staff to work longer hours. These positions have been restored now and PRE is back to its original seven person staffing level. -23- 4. Dr. Ed Williams, a statistician who has the longest tenure in PRE, testified that, after one of the testing coordinators left in 2005, he temporarily assumed those duties, in addition to his duties as a statistician. In November 2005, Arthur Oles was hired to fill this test coordinator position. Mr. Oles left the position in September of 2006, and Dr. Williams again assumed those duties until the position was filled on October 26, 2006. According to Dr. Williams, throughout the time PRE was required to discharge obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy, it was adequately staffed. I fully credit Dr. Williams's testimony and find that LRSD adequately staffed PRE during the relevant compliance period. The temporary vacancies in PRE were simply the result of normal attrition or downsizing that routinely occurs in organizations the size of LRSD. It was never my intention to require LRSD to meet its obligations in the 2004 Compliance Remedy with \"mathematical precision.\" Rather, consistent with the language in the Revised Plan, I expected LRSD to substantially comply with its obligations. The evidence during the January 2007 unitary status hearings fully supports my finding that LRSD has substantially complied with all of its obligations in section A of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 2. Section B: Act in Good Faith to Devise and Implement a Comprehensive Program Assessment Process l. Shortly after entry of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD began work to satisfy its obligations under section B. Dr. DeJamette, Dr. Olivine Roberts,55 and Dr. Ross worked together to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. I find all three of these individuals are very knowledgeable in preparing and using program assessments and program evaluations. And all three are qualified to devise and implement a comprehensive program assessment process for LRSD. 55LRSD's Director of Curriculum and Instruction. -24- I I I I I I I I I I 2. Together Drs. DeJamette, Roberts, and Ross devised a comprehensive program assessment process for LRSD, which was set forth in Regulation IL-R.56 Importantly, this regulation, in conjunction with LRSD Policy IL,57 makes it clear that LRSD agrees to prepare all future program evaluations in accordance with the standards developed by the national Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. During the numerous unitary status hearings held since 2002, Dr. Ross and several other witnesses have testified that these are the highest and most rigorous standards for preparing a program evaluation. I find that Regulation IL~R, in conjunction with Policy IL, substantially complies with the obligation in section B that LRSD devise a comprehensive program assessment process. 3. Baker Kurrus and several other members of the LRSD Board testified that, on December 16, 2004, LRSD's Board unanimously approved Regulation IL-R. To date, LRSD's - Board has approved Program Evaluation Agendas annually requiring four programs to be evaluated during the 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07 school years. The first eight of those evaluations were required by section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. LRSD's Board voluntarily elected to evaluate four 2. 7 programs during the 2006-07 school year. LRSD Board members testified that LRSD intends to continue this practice for the foreseeable future. 4. During the 2002 unitary status hearing, Dr. Bonnie Lesley58 testified that PRE had done a good job of preparing annual assessments of the 2.7 programs. According to Dr. Lesley, an \"assessment\" was much more informal and \"dynamic\" than a \"program evaluation.\" She also made it clear that 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan required LRSD to prepare both assessments and evaluations on the  2.7 programs. The evidence in the 2002 and 2004 unitary status hearings 56See Joshua's Exhibit 6. 51See Joshua's Exhibit 4. 58LRSD' s Associate Superintendent of Curriculum. -25- established that PRE has generally performed well in preparing the program assessments required by 2.7.1. 5. In section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, at footnote 39, I explained that the \"comprehensive program assessment process\" required LRSD: (a) to prepare formal evaluations of some of the key  2. 7 programs; and (b) to prepare informal program assessments of other  2. 7 programs. The evidence during the 2004 unitary status hearing established that LRSD failed to satisfy its program evaluation obligations under  2. 7. l -- not its program assessment obligations. Thus, sections B and C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy primarily focused on the things LRSD needed to do to satisfy its program evaluation obligation under  2.7.1. This explains why Regulation IL-R primarily discussed the criteria to be followed in preparing formal program evaluations. However, it also specifically provided that LRSD was obligated to prepare - \"summative\" or formal evaluations; informal assessments; less rigorous formative evaluations; and fast or brief \"snapshots\" of programs. Regulation IL-R noted: \"As rigor and formality diminish along the range ofreview, fewer standards apply.\"59 6. On November 16, 2006, LRSD's Board approved a Resolution which states its intention: (a) to \"continue to assess LRSD programs, particularly those[ 2.7] programs designed to improve and remediate the achievement of African-American students\"; and (b) \"to continue to follow the comprehensive program assessment process approved by the Board on December 16, 2004, even after LRSD is released from federal court supervision. \"60 By approving Regulation IL-R and the November 16, 2006 Resolution, LRSD's Board has acted in good faith to implement the program assessment process required by  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan. 59See Joshua's Exhibit 6 at p. I. 60See LRSD's Exhibit 5. -26- 7. Dr. Olivine Roberts, Dr. Ed Williams,61 and Dr. Hugh Hattabaugh62 all testified at length about how LRSD has acted in good faith to implement the comprehensive program assessment process. Dr. Roberts testified that, since the adoption of Regulation IL-R, PRE has made an annual recommendation to the Board that it adopt a program assessment agenda and the Board has always approved that agenda. Using those annual agendas, LRSD has prepared the program evaluations that I required in section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, as well as additional voluntary evaluations of other 2.7 programs -- including the Voyager Reading program and the Transition to Advanced Math program. LRSD has also evaluated several  2. 7 initiatives including Avid, an in-school support system for college bound African-American students, and another initiative designed to increase the number of African-American students enrolled in advanced placement courses. Finally, Dr. Roberts testified about how LRSD has performed annual program assessments -- which are more informal and dynamic than program evaluations -- of other  2. 7 programs. 8. Dr. Roberts testified that the program evaluations LRSD was required to prepare in order to satisfy sections Band C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy greatly helped LRSD to identify the  2. 7 programs that were actually working to improve the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. LRSD Board member Baker Kurrus testified that, even though LRSD appealed the June 2004 Decision to the Eighth Circuit, he believed the Compliance Remedy was very helpful and set forth a \"very positive approach\" for LRSD to follow in meeting its obligations under 2. 7 .1. Dr. Katherine Mitchell, the current chair of the Board, also testified that the 2004 Compliance Remedy contained the elements LRSD needed to satisfy in order to meet its obligations under  2. 7. l . As noted earlier, the Eighth Circuit ultimately affirmed the 2004 Compliance Remedy, but 61A PRE statistician. 62LRSD's Deputy Superintendent. -27- it questioned the need for the prescribed remedy and criticized a number of its requirements as going beyond what LRSD agreed to do in 2.7.1. I am pleased that LRSD's top administrators and Board members recognized the soundness of the 2004 Compliance Remedy and why the specific requirements were necessary to address the shortcomings in LRSD's initial attempt to satisfy its obligations under  2.7.1, as those obligations were more generally described in the 2002 Compliance Remedy. 9. Dr. Roberts made it clear that the eight  2.7 program evaluations prepared by Drs. Ross and Catterall63 were beneficial to LRSD in determining the effectiveness of those programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. In addition, she testified that LRSD has agreed to implement all of the changes and modifications to those eight programs that were recommended by Drs. Ross and Catterall. IO. The evaluations of the Pre-K program, the Smart Thrive program, the Reading Recovery program, the Year Round Education program, and the A Plus program demonstrated that all five of those  2.7 programs are improving the academic achievement of African-American students. While the evaluations of the Read 180 program, the 2151 Century program, and the Compass Learning program demonstrated no statistical benefits in improving the academic achievement of African-American students, the evaluators believed that, after making changes in these three programs, they also should show a statistical benefit in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Therefore, LRSD has implemented, or is in the process of implementing, all of the recommended changes and is continuing all eight of those programs during the current school year. Finally, LRSD has performed, or intends to perform, follow-up annual evaluations on these eight programs to determine their effectiveness after all of the recommended changes have been implemented. 63 An expert who, in addition to Dr. Ross, conducted program evaluations. -28- 11. Dr. Roberts testified' that LRSD is in the process of completing a \"Data Warehouse\" where all district, school, and student data will be maintained in a central data storage facility that will be accessible to authorized personnel, such as PRE employees. LRSD has elected to use Business Objects software to develop this data warehouse. Before the 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD had used Business Objects software to manage its financial data for a number of years. In 2005, LRSD administrators decided to use this same software to create the Data Warehouse, which will eventually contain all ofLRSD's data -- including district, school, and student data. LRSD administrators chose to use Business Objects software, rather than competing software sold by TetraData. Dr. Roberts saw the competing presentations on the Business Objects software and the TetraData software, and she believes the Business Objects software can access and configure the data needed by PRE to prepare future program assessments and program evaluations. Assuming the - Data Warehouse performs as expected, this will make it much easier for PRE to perform program assessments and gather the data needed to prepare the more rigorous and expensive program evaluations. 12. Dr. Roberts testified that, once the Data Warehouse is complete, PRE should be able to access by computer all of the information needed to prepare assessments and evaluations of 2. 7 programs. As explained by Dr. Roberts, all students who have participated in any of the  2. 7 programs are \"tagged\" in the Data Warehouse so that PRE can pull up a tagged student's name to see how many 2.7 programs he or she has participated in, as well as the standardized test scores and grades for the student both before and after exposure to  2. 7 programs. This will also allow PRE to track the tagged students over time to assess how they are performing after completing each specific 2. 7 program. This should allow PRE to gauge the effectiveness of the 2. 7 programs on a more expedited basis. -29- 13. According to Dr. Roberts, LRSD has used the Data Warehouse to create overall Curriculum Maps that will provide the infrastructure upon which School Portfolios will be constructed at all elementary, middle, and high schools. Dr. Roberts believes these Curriculum Maps are necessary before LRSD can build School Portfolios in the Data Warehouse. Eventually, these School Portfolios will contain all of the relevant performance data for students in a particular school and can be used to determine how well a school has implemented a  2. 7 program, as well as how students are performing, on a school-by-school basis, in those  2.7 programs. LRSD intends to begin implementing School Portfolios at ten schools during the 2007-08 school year and complete the process over the following two school years. 14. Dr. Roberts, Dr. Williams, and Mr. Kurrus all testified at length about why they believed LRSD had \"deeply embedded\" the comprehensive program assessment process in - Regulation IL-R as a permanent part of its curriculum. I have already explained why I should not have used such a subjective standard to determine whether LRSD had met its compliance obligations. Nevertheless, after hearing everything that has been done to make the comprehensive program assessment process a permanent part ofLRSD's curriculum, as explained by Drs. Roberts, Williams, and Mr. Kurrus, I believe it would be hard to find that it has not been \"deeply embedded.\" 15. Dr. Williams testified that, in July 2006, LRSD began \"live training\" with its employees on how to using and accessing data from the Data Warehouse. While there are still some data points that need to be added to the Data Warehouse, Dr. Williams believes it will meet PRE's needs in accessing the data required to prepare program assessments and evaluations. 16. Dr. DeJarnette64 and Jim Wohlleb65 were critical ofLRSD' s decision to use Business Objects software. Both testified that TetraData was superior software that was specifically designed 64Director of PRE. 65 A PRE statistician. -30- to configure data for use in preparing program assessments and program evaluations. They were critical of the amount of training they had received in using the Business Objects software and believed that the Data Warehouse contained too many errors and was still too incomplete to allow PRE to use it as a source for preparing assessments and evaluations of the 2.7 programs. Both testified that, only a few days before the commencement of the January 2007 unitary status hearing, they tried to access the Data Warehouse to get the student data needed to prepare a hypothetical assessment of one of the 2.7 programs. They testified that, because so few of the students in the  2.7 programs have been tagged, they could get only one of the eight data points necessary to prepare the hypothetical assessment. Finally, they testified that they had invited a representative of ODM and Joshua to view the inadequacies of the Business Objects software and the Data Warehouse. Dr. DeJarnette also criticized LRSD' s delay in implementing the School Portfolios and in creating an unreliable Data Warehouse that she may not be able to use to prepare future program assessments and program evaluations. 17. Dr. Hugh Hattabaugh testified that LRSD decided to use Business Objects software because it can be used to access financial and budget data, as well as the student data needed by PRE. According to Dr. Hattabaugh, TetraData cannot be used to access financial and budget data. Additionally, Business Objects software allows LRSD to create a Data Warehouse on its own servers, which allows it to own and control the data.66 18. I fully credit Dr. Hattabaugh's explanation of why LRSD elected to use Business Objects software, rather than TetraData software, to create the Data Warehouse. I find that LRSD acted in good faith when selecting the Business Objects software, which Drs. Roberts, Williams, and 66TetraData requires school districts that use its software to store all of their data on its server in North Carolina. School districts are then charged an annual per student fee to access information from TetraData's server. -31 - - ------- Hattabaugh all believe will fully meet the needs of PRE in preparing program assessments and evaluations. 19. LRSD hired the Janis Group to create the Data Warehouse using the Business Objects software. Mr. Larry Naeyaert , the director of business intelligence for the Janis Group, was assigned the LRSD Data Warehouse project in 2005. For most of2005 and all of 2006, he worked essentially full-time in Little Rock installing the Business Objects software and creating the Data Warehouse. As a former employee of Business Objects, Mr. Naeyaert is thoroughly familiar with the operation of that software. He also is a specialist in setting up business intelligence systems and data bases. 20. Mr. Naeyaert testified in detail about how: (a) student testing, performance, demographics, scheduling, and observational data were entered into the Data Warehouse; (b) - security features have been installed to protect student data; ( c) data have been \"normalized\" to make it available in a common format, which can be matched to a particular student's name; (d) errors have been corrected in the testing and achievement data and a computer program developed to check each night for any input errors that may have occurred earlier in the day; (e) individual student \"data marts\" were created that include all of the data that PRE employees said they needed to prepare program assessments and evaluations; ( f) a student tagging system was developed to track all of the students who have been in any of the 2.7 programs; and (g) five full days of training were provided to all PRE employees.67 21. Mr. Naeyaert testified that LRSD's Data Warehouse is almost complete, although it will be necessary to update it on a continuing basis with new data. The only incomplete data, not yet in the system, are the past school year's achievement data, teacher certification data, and \"perception\" data. Mr. Naeyaert testified that, in July and October of 2006, he performed multiple 67Dr. DeJamette attended only a little over one day of that training. -32- live demonstrations using the Data Warehouse for PRE employees, and the Business Objects software was able to access the requested information from the Data Warehouse. 22. LRSD recalled Mr. Naeyaert, as a rebuttal witness, to controvert the testimony of Dr. DeJarnette and Mr. Wohlleb that, shortly before the January 2007 unitary status hearing, they were unable to access the Data Warehouse and obtain the data they needed for a hypothetical program assessment. Mr. Naeyaert demonstrated how he was able to access the Data Warehouse and obtain all of the data that Dr. DeJarnette and Mr. Wohlleb testified they were unable to access. 23. Dr. DeJarnette, Mr. Wohlleb, Dr. Roberts, Dr. Williams, and Mr. Naeyaert all agreed that LRSD maintains \"data silos\" (individual servers) in numerous departments, which contain all of the information PRE needs to prepare program assessments and evaluations. To access these data silos, PRE sends a \"radar request\" to LRSD's information technology department. Data specialists - then go to the data silos and assemble the requested data. Dr. DeJarnette and Mr. Wohlleb testified it usually takes two days or less for the data specialists to provide PRE with all of the requested data. Thus, even if the Data Warehouse failed to provide PRE with the data it needed, it could still prepare program assessments and evaluations using radar requests to access the data from the decentralized data silos where it is also maintained. The software concerns about perceived problems with the Data Warehouse represent a difference of opinion and preference, but the choice of Business Objects in no way indicates that LRSD has failed to comply with its obligations. 24. Dr. DeJarnette testified that the Data Warehouse was necessary in order to deeply embed Regulation IL-R.68 She also believes that the creation of School Portfolios is required under Regulation IL-R. However, Regulation IL-R, which sets forth LRSD's comprehensive program assessment process, says nothing about LRSD's agreeing to create a \"Data Warehouse,\" nor does 68Joshua's Exhibit 6. -33- it mention \"School Portfolios.\"69 In short, there is nothing in the 2004 Compliance Remedy or Regulation IL-R which obligates LRSD to create a Data Warehouse or School Portfolios or to accomplish those two objectives before the comprehensive program assessment process could be deemed to be \"deeply embedded.\" Clearly, LRSD administrators voluntarily decided to create a Data Warehouse and School Portfolios, in part, to make it easier for PRE to have access to the data it needed to perform assessments and evaluations. While this decision may be a good one, it was not required by 2.7. l, the 2004 Compliance Remedy, nor Regulation IL-R. 25. According to Dr. DeJarnette, on December 1, 2006, LRSD Superintendent Roy Brooks suspended her, and a short time later she was notified that she had been discharged. On January 8, 2007, LRSD' s Board heard Dr. DeJ arnette' s appeal and reinstated her as director of PRE, effective January 10, 2007. According to Dr. DeJamette, Dr. Brooks discharged her because, - contrary to his orders, she informed LRSD Board members in early November 2006 of perceived problems with LRSD's compliance efforts. Dr. Brooks and Dr. Hattabaugh testified that Dr. DeJarnette was discharged because she had become openly defiant to her superiors and did not go through the proper chain-of-command when she communicated directly with LRSD's Board members. Both denied that she was discharged because she believed LRSD had not met its obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 26. The facts surrounding Dr. DeJarnette's discharge and reinstatement are irrelevant to whether LRSD has substantially complied with the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Nevertheless, because Dr. DeJamette 's discharge and reinstatement may be raised on appeal, I will review briefly the relevant facts, which are essentially undisputed: 69The only time that phrase is even mentioned is on page 2, under one of the headings on a checklist that reads \"Formative Evaluation Process (School Portfolios).\" -34- (a) By December of 2004, a few months after she was hired, Dr. DeJamette had a dispute with her direct supervisor, Dr. Roberts, about a district-wide downsizing that caused her to believe she might lose one of her test administrators and her secretary. Following this dispute, Dr. DeJamette began complaining to Dr. Brooks about how Dr. Roberts was impeding the work of PRE. Dr. DeJarnette asked Dr. Brooks to allow her to report directly to him, but he refused. (b) During 2005 and 2006, Dr. DeJamette began to meet with Joy Springer, Joshua's primary monitor, without LRSD's attorney present. She also began sharing with Ms. Springer draft documents ofLRSD' s compliance efforts, even though LRSD' s attorney had explicitly directed her not to do this. (c) In August of 2006, PRE sent LRSD's attorney the final draft of the final quarterly update, which was dated September 1, 2006. 70 In this update, Dr. DeJarnette raised what she thought were a number of problems with LRSD's efforts to comply with the 2004 Compliance Remedy. All of the \"compliance problems\" raised by Dr. DeJamette involve obligations that go beyond what was required under  2.7.1 and the 2004 Compliance Remedy. (d) LRSD's attorney deleted almost all of Dr. DeJarnette's remarks in section D of the September 1, 2006 update, which criticized LRSD's efforts to comply primarily with the \"deeply embedded\" obligation in section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy.71 This upset Dr. DeJarnette, who believed that LRSD's attorney was trying to keep the Board in the dark about potential problems with LRSD's compliance efforts. 10See Joshua's Exhibit 24. 11See LRSD's Exhibit 2H. -35- (e) Sometime in October of 2006, one or more Board members found out about LRSD' s attorney deleting a portion of PRE's draft of the September I, 2006 quarterly update and asked Dr. Roberts to have Dr. DeJarnette advise the Board of what happened. Dr. DeJarnette sent each Board member a letter dated November 3, 2006, along with a document captioned \"PRE Compliance History 2004-2006.\"72 (f) On December 1, 2006, Dr. Brooks suspended Dr. DeJarnette and, a short time later, fired her. On January 9, 2006, the Board heard Dr. DeJarnette's appeal and voted 4-3 to reverse Dr. Brooks's decision and to reinstate Dr. DeJarnette. 27. I fully credit Dr. Roberts's testimony detailing the long list of things LRSD did to implement and embed the comprehensive program assessment process contained in Regulation IL-R. I credit the testimony of Dr. Roberts, Dr. Williams, and Mr. Naeyaert on the current status of the - Data Warehouse and School Portfolios, and the suitability of Business Objects software as a platform for accessing the information in the Data Warehouse. I find that much of Dr. DeJarnette's and Mr. Wohlleb's criticism of the Data Warehouse, School Portfolios, and the Business Objects software lacks objectivity. 28. I find that LRSD' s administrators have substantially complied with their obligations m section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy by implementing a comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part ofLRSD' s curriculum. I further fmd that, in implementing the comprehensive program assessment process, LRSD has acted in good faith. 29. LRSD has gone the extra mile to ensure that its program assessment process is and will continue to be a permanent part of its curriculum. I would be hard pressed not to conclude that LRSD has now \"deeply embedded\" that process as a permanent part of its curriculum, although this standard is now abandoned. 72See Joshua's Exhibit 31. -36- - 3. Section C: Prepare Four Evaluations of Key  2. 7 Programs During Each of the Next Two Academic Years (2004-05 and 2005-06) 1. To comply with section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD hired Dr. Ross and Dr. James S. Catterall. Dr. Ross prepared evaluations of six key 2.7 programs: (1) Reading Recovery;73 (2) Compass Learning;74 (3) Smart/Thrive;75 (4) 2l51 Century Community Learning Centers;76 (5) Read 180;77 and (6) Pre-K Literacy.78 Dr. Catterall, another highly qualified consultant, prepared evaluations on two key  2. 7 programs: ( 1) Year Round Education; 79 and (2) A+ Education. 80 2. For the 2004-05 school year, Drs. Ross and Catterall prepared evaluations ofReading Recovery, Compass Learning, Smart/Thrive, and Year Round Education. LRSD timely filed these four evaluations with the Court on February 6, 2006.81 3. For the 2005-06 school year, Drs. Ross and Catterall prepared evaluations of 2151 Century Community Learning Centers, A+ Education, Read 180, and Pre-K Literacy. The first three evaluations were filed on November 17, 2006, and the last evaluation was filed on December 15, 73LRSD Exhibit IA. 74LRSD Exhibit lB. 75LRSD Exhibit IC. 76LRSD Exhibit IE. 77LRSD Exhibit lG. 78LRSD Exhibit 1 H. 79LRSD Exhibit ID. 80LRSD Exhibit IF. 81See Doc. No. 3985. -37- 2006. All four program evaluations were filed within the time limit specified in section J of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, as extended by my Order dated August 1, 2006.82 4. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in identifying the eight key 2.7 programs that were to be evaluated. Consistent with section F of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, LRSD provided timely written notice to the ODM and Joshua of the names of the eight key programs selected for evaluation. ODM and Joshua agreed to the eight key  2. 7 programs that were eventually selected for evaluation. 5. In his evidentiary deposition, 83 Dr. Ross testified that the six evaluations he prepared met all of the requirements contained in the 2004 Compliance Remedy. He also testified that all six of these evaluations were \"good evaluations,\" in that they accurately answered the research questions and reached statistically valid conclusions which demonstrated four of the programs84 - were working to improve the academic achievement of African-American students, and two of the programs85 did not appear to be working. However, Dr. Ross testified that, after LRSD implemented recommended changes, these two programs should show a statistically significant benefit in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Dr. Ross recommended that LRSD continue to offer all six of these 2.7 programs. Since Dr. Ross's recommendation, LRSD has implemented the recommended changes in those two programs and plans to perform a follow-up evaluation to determine if, after the changes, the programs are now working. After reading all eight of these step 2 evaluations, I find that they comply, in all respects, with the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 82Doc. No. 4035. 83Court's Exhibit A. 84Reading Recovery, Smartffhrive, Read 180, and Pre-K Literacy. 85Compass Learning and 21st Century Learning Centers. -38- 6. Dr. Ross testified that PRE provided him with all of the data he needed to prepare these six evaluations of 2.7 programs. While Dr. Ross identified several discrete problems with some of the data, he did not assert that these problems affected the validity or utility of the evaluations. He also made it clear that \"School Portfolios\" were not necessary in order to access the data required to prepare accurate and reliable program evaluations. 7. In his deposition, 86 Dr. Catterall testified that PRE provided him with all of the data he needed to prepare evaluations of the Year Round Education program and the A+ Education program. He stated that the data he received from LRSD was better than the data he received from most school districts. Dr. Catterall also indicated that the evaluations he prepared of these two  2. 7 programs complied with all of the requirements of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Finally, Dr. Catterall testified that School Portfolios were not needed in order to prepare program - evaluations. 8. In her evidentiary deposition,87 Dr. Victoria Bernhardt, an outside consultant with expertise in using TetraData to construct Data Warehouses and School Portfolios for school districts, also confirmed that Data Warehouses and School Portfolios were not necessary in order to prepare a program evaluation. Dr. Bernhardt believed TetraData software was easier to use than Business Objects software, and TetraData software was specifically developed to create Data Warehouses for school districts, unlike Business Objects software. Finally, Dr. Bernhardt acknowledged that she owns stock options in TetraData. 9. During the January 2007 unitary status hearings, Joshua offered little testimony challenging whether these eight evaluations of key  2. 7 programs satisfied the requirements in section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Dr. DeJarnette testified that one of the high school 86Court's Exhibit B. 87Court's Exhibit C. -39- principals, who had students participating in the 21 st Century Community Leaming Centers program, administered 120 end-of-course algebra exams but failed to have 40% of the exams graded. Dr. DeJarnette believed this may have affected the accuracy of Dr. Ross's evaluation of that program. She also testified that Dr. Ross did not receive all of the data from all of the schools participating in the Read 180 program because some of the servers containing that test score data were dismantled before that data could be given to Dr. Ross. She believed this loss of data may have limited the use of the Read 180 evaluation. In criticizing the accuracy of a small part of the data used in two of the program evaluations, Dr. DeJarnette makes too much of a small glitch. Her testimony falls well short of establishing any substantial problems with the data used in those evaluations sufficient to create a question concerning whether LRSD complied with the requirements in section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. - 10. In Joshua's November 15, 2006 Objections to LRSD' s Compliance Report, 88 the only challenge it makes to any of the eight program evaluations is in paragraph 5, which contains the following cryptic statement: \"[T]he evaluations of the Read 180 program and the 21 st Century Community Leaming Centers program contain insufficient descriptions of the program being evaluated to meet LRSD's own standards and the Court's Order.\"89 To the extent that Joshua was serious about challenging sufficiency of how these two programs were described, they failed to present any evidence to support this argument during the January 2007 unitary status hearing. Accordingly, I find that LRSD has substantially complied with all of its obligations under section C of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 88Doc. No. 4058. 89Jd. -40- 4. Section D: Content and Organization of the Eight Evaluations of Key  2.7 Programs 1. Each of the eight evaluations was designed to answer the following research questions: \"Has the  2. 7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district?\" And each of these evaluations is organized and written in a way that makes the information readily understandable to a lay person such as I. 2. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall both testified that PRE provided them with all of the support and assistance they needed to prepare the eight evaluations. Dr. DeJamette made it clear in the quarterly updates and in her testimony in the January 2007 unitary status hearing that she and the PRE department supervised the preparation of the eight evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall to provide them with the data and other assistance they needed. Dr. Williams also testified that PRE fulfilled its duties in overseeing the preparation of these eight evaluations and working closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall to provide the support and assistance they requested. 3. I find that LRSD has substantially complied with all of the obligations in section D of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 5. Section E: Record Keeping Obligation 1. After reviewing the eight step 2 evaluations, I find that Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall performed all of the record keeping obligations required in section E of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. In addition, during the January 2007 unitary status hearing, Joshua did not offer any arguments or testimony directed at challenging the obligations imposed under this section of the remedy. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with all of the obligations in section E of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. -41- 6. Section F: Notice Obligations l. As I have previously stated, PRE timely provided ODM and Joshua with written notice of the eight key 2.7 programs that PRE and Dr. Ross identified for program evaluations. PRE also provided ODM and Joshua with a fmal draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented for approval to the LRSD Board. LRSD's Board approved the comprehensive program assessment process set forth in Regulation IL-R on December 16, 2004, well before the December 31, 2004 deadline. Finally, during the January 2007 unitary status hearing, Joshua did not offer any evidence challenging LRSD's compliance with any of the obligations in this section of the remedy. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with all of the obligations in section G of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 7. Section G: Quarterly Updates l. LRSD timely filed the eight quarterly updates required by this section of the remedy. LRSD also provided ODM and Joshua with copies of these quarterly updates when each update was filed. 2. The only contested aspect ofLRSD's preparation of the quarterly updates concerns Joshua's assertion that LRSD's counsel improperly deleted information from section B of the final draft of the September 1, 2006 update that Dr. DeJarnette believed should have been included. As previously explained, in section B of the fmal draft of the September 1, 2006 update, Dr. DeJarnette raised compliance concerns involving: ( a) the Data Warehouse and School Portfolios; (b) errors and inaccuracies in some of the data contained in the Data Warehouse; and (c) the delay in completing both of those projects, which still had work that remained to be done, as of September 1, 2006. 90 Dr. DeJarnette believed the completion of both the Data Warehouse and School Portfolios were a 90See Joshua's Exhibit 24. -42- necessary and essential part of\"deeply embedding\" the comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part ofLRSD' s curriculum. She testified that, by editing out her criticism ofLRSD' s compliance efforts in section B of the September 1, 2006 quarterly update, LRSD's attorney was preventing LRSD's Board and the Court from receiving crucial information. 3. As I have previously explained, nothing in the 2004 Compliance Remedy obligated LRSD to install a Data Warehouse or to create School Portfolios. Similarly, Regulation IL-R does not mention the Data Warehouse or School Portfolios. Finally, Dr. Ross and Dr. Barnhardt both testified that a school district could embed a comprehensive program assessment process, as a permanent part of its curriculum, without creating a Data Warehouse or School Portfolios. 4. The information LRSD's attorney deleted from Dr. DeJarnette's final draft of the September I, 2006 Quarterly Update has no bearing on the question of whether LRSD has - substantially complied with the obligations contained in section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 5. I find that LRSD has substantially complied with all of the obligations in section G of the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 8. Section H: The ODM I. During the 2007 unitary status hearing, Joshua called Gene Jones, one of the ODM monitors, to offer testimony regarding LRSD' s alleged noncompliance. While Mr. Jones conceded that the term \"deeply embedded\" has never been defined, and that he was not sure what that term meant, he nevertheless, stated that he did not believe that LRSD had \"deeply embedded\" the comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part of its curriculum. Be that as it may, \"deeply embedded\" is no longer required. 2. Mr. Jones also testified that, at Dr. DeJarnette's request, he was in PRE's office several days before the commencement of the January 2007 unitary status hearing to observe alleged failure of the Data Warehouse (to provide seven of the eight points of data she needed to prepare her -43- I I I I I I I I I I I hypothetical program). Mr. Jones did not indicate that he had taken an independent look at section B of the 2004 Compliance Remedy to determine whether it required LRSD to create a Data Warehouse and School Portfolios. (It does not.) 9. Section I: Joshua's Monitoring Obligations l. The 2004 Compliance Remedy reads: I want to be very clear on this point- if compliance problems arise, the parties must immediately bring them to my attention so that I can resolve them while there is still time for LRSD to make \"mid-course corrections.\"91 2. On June 26, 2006, the Eighth Circuit entered its decision affinning the June 2004 Compliance Remedy.92 The Court agreed that \"Joshua had not waived its right to challenge either LRSD's interpretation of the 2002 Remedy or LRSD's claim that it had substantially complied with the requirements of that remedy.\"93 However, the Court went on to say: Nevertheless, in light of its failure to call to the district court's attention its disagreement with LRSD's interpretation of the 2002 order, it would ill behoove Joshua to raise any further technical complaints about LRSD' s efforts to comply with the 2002 order.94 3. Two days after the Eighth Circuit issued its June 26, 2006 decision Joshua filed an affidavit by Ms. Joy Springer. 4. Ms. Springer is a long-time paralegal for Joshua's counsel. She has considerable experience and has developed considerable expertise in the monitoring process. 92LRSD v. NLRSD, et al., 451 F.3d 528 (8th Cir. 2006). 93/d. at 539. -44-  5. During the January 2007 unitary status hearing, Ms. Springer testified, in a six-page affidavit dated June 28, 2006,95 that she had brought to the attention ofLRSD's Board her concerns about LRSD' s compliance with its obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Mr. Kurrus and several other LRSD Board members testified that this was their first notice that Joshua had any concerns about LRSD's compliance efforts. This was less than 120 days before the deadline for LRSD to file its Final Compliance Report and twenty-one months into LRSD's compliance efforts. On August 17, 2006, Ms. Springer wrote a letter to LRSD' s attorney96 detailing additional concerns that she had about LRSD's compliance efforts. 6. Most of the alleged compliance problems noted by Ms. Springer in her affidavit arose during the 2005 school year. The affidavit's list of problems include: inadequate professional development in the area of program assessments and evaluations; a delay in the use of questionnaires - as part of the program assessment process; delays in the completion of the Data Warehouse; Drs. Brooks and Roberts \"de-emphasiz[ing] the importance of PRE and the compliance remedy,\" by seldom, if ever, attending \"PRE meetings\" or \"evaluation team meetings,\" and reducing or failing to fill positions in PRE; and LRSD's alleged failure to meet its obligation of\"embedding program assessments\" into its curriculum and instruction program. 7. I would be hard pressed to find that Joshua's objections were timely filed in view of the Eighth Circuit language, quoted above, and in view of the language in the 2004 Compliance Remedy.97 Be that as it may, most compliance issues raised in the affidavit deal with matters that are clearly not required by the 2004 Compliance Remedy (\"deeply embedding\" is no longer required). My previous findings make it clear that I reject Ms. Springer's view of the alleged 95Joshua's Exhibit 18. 96Joshua's Exhibit 19. 91See LRSD II, 2004 WL 5187587, at *34. -45-  compliance problems which are covered by the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Accordingly, I do not credit them in determining whether LRSD is in compliance. 10. Section J: Deadline for LRSD to File Program Evaluations I. As previously explained, LRSD filed the eight evaluations of key  2. 7 programs within the times specified in section K, as extended by my later orders, and has substantially complied with its obligations under section J. 11. Section K: Deadline for LRSD to File Final Compliance Report I. LRSD filed its Final Compliance Report98 on October 16, 2006. Joshua filed objections99 on November 15, 2006. 2. Thus, I find that LRSD has substantially complied with its obligations under section K. C. Miscellaneous: The Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull \u0026amp; Burrow (\"QGTB\") Report I. On October 3, 2006, Dr. DeJarnette filed a grievance with the LRSD Human Resources Department alleging, among other things, that certain LRSD senior administrators had created a hostile work environment by directing her to withhold information from the LRSD Board, ODM, and Joshua, and by advising her that, if she did not withhold this information, she would be discharged. 2. On November 6, 2006, LRSD retained the law firm of QGTB to conduct an independent investigation of the facts surrounding Dr. DeJamette's grievance and her allegations that she was ordered to withhold certain information concerning LRSD's efforts to comply with the 2004 Compliance Remedy. On November 9, 2006, LRSD's Board approved hiring QGTB and directed QGTB to continue its investigation and prepare a written report. On November 21 , 2006, 98Doc. No. 4050. 99Doc. No. 4058. -46- QGTB presented LRSD's Board with a report entitled \"Independent Investigation Report to the Board of Directors ofLRSD\" (the \"QGTB Report\"). 3. During the January 2007 unitary status hearing, LRSD introduced the QGTB Report100 into evidence for the limited purpose of establishing LRSD's good faith in responding to Dr. DeJamette's grievance alleging a hostile work environment. 4. As I have previously explained, I find Dr. DeJamette's discharge and later reinstatement as Director of PRE to be a personnel issue that has nothing to do with whether LRSD has substantially complied with its obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy. I further find that none of the facts contained in the QGTB Report are admissible in this case to prove the truth of any of the matters asserted in that document. D. 1. Impact of September 2006 School Board Elections From the time LRSD entered the Revised Plan in 1998 until the September 2006 school board elections, Caucasians have held the majority of seats on LRSD' s Board. This changed after the September elections, and LRSD' s Board is now composed of four African-Americans and three Caucasians. 2. During the January 2007 unitary status hearing, the three Caucasian Board members, Mr. Kurrus, Mr. Larry Berkley, and Ms. Melanie Fox, all testified that LRSD had deeply embedded the comprehensive program assessment process and substantially complied with all of the other obligations in the 2004 Compliance Remedy. 3. The African-American Board members are Chairperson Dr. Katherine Mitchell, Mr. Robert Daughtery, Mr. Charles Armstrong, and Ms. Diane Curry. They testified that they either did not believe, or did not have enough information to know if, LRSD had \"deeply embedded\" the comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part of its curriculum. They also 100LRSD Exhibit 6. -47- expressed concerns about whether LRSD had substantially complied with its other obligations under the 2004 Compliance Remedy. Some of the African-American Board members also expressed reservations about whether it was in LRSD's best interest to be declared unitary because LRSD could lose millions of dollars of state funding that it now receives under the settlement agreement with the State of Arkansas. 4. Because the \"deeply embedded\" language has been struck as too subjective, the opinions of the Board members on the question of whether LRSD has \"deeply embedded\" the comprehensive program assessment process is not relevant. I do not find the concerns expressed by some Board members regarding the effect of LRSD's substantial compliance with the 2004 Compliance Remedy on other obligations to be at issue now. It is understandable that Board members would be concerned over a potential loss of state funding, but that is not, and cannot be, an appropriate consideration in determining whether the District is unitary. I do not fault the new board members for their doubts. It seems to me that these doubts reflect a heathy skepticism, rather than negative attitudes. This is to be expected of new members while they are getting their sea legs. 5. All seven Board members agreed that improving the academic achievement of African-American students is of great importance, and that the District will need to continue to implement, assess, and evaluate 2. 7 programs for the foreseeable future. They support Regulation IL-Rand believe that it must be made a permanent part ofLRSD's curriculum. They believe PRE plays a crucial role in overseeing the implementation, assessment, and evaluation of 2. 7 programs. By finding common ground on these four important priorities, I am optimistic that the Board will continue to ensure that the comprehensive program assessment process remains a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum for as long as it takes to improve the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. -48- IV. Conclusion Nine years after executing the March 15, 1998 Revised Plan, LRSD finally has achieved unitary status by substantially complying with all of the obligations contained in that document. This means that LRSD is no longer under any supervision and monitoring obligations from me, ODM, or Joshua. LRSD's Board can now operate the district as it sees fit; answerable to no one except LRSD's students and patrons and the voters who elected them to office. While the road has been long and at times frustrating -- for LRSD and for me -- I want to express my heartfelt best wishes as LRSD begins to operate, as our Founders intended, under control of the citizens of the City of Little Rock. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that LRSD be and hereby is declared completely unitary in all aspects of its operations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LRSD is released from all further supervision and monitoring from the Court, ODM, and Joshua based upon its having substantially complied with all of its obligations under the Revised Plan, the September 2002 Compliance Remedy, and the June 2004 Compliance Remedy. DATED this 23d day of February, 2007. /s/ Wm. R.Wilson Jr. UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE -49- 03/24/2007 10:26 5016045237 USDC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ~ICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTlE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3326 (501) 804-5140 Facsimile (501) 604-5149 March 24, 1007 Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72024 Re: LRSDv. PCSSD, eta/, 4:82-CV-00866 Joshua's Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal Dear Mr. Walker: What is opposing counsel's position? Please advise. P.S. Please refer to Local Rul 6.2(b). Original to the Clerk of the Court cc: Other Counsel of Reco:rd Cordially, ts/ wm. R.Wilson,Jr, PAGE 02/02 03/24/2007 10:26 5016045237 USDC TO: DATE: FAX COVER SHEET UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS Chris Heller Sam Jones Steve Jones John Walker Robert Pressman Scott Richardson ODM Mark Burnette .., . .) ~ l '/ . .;;, _;;.. Telephone: 501-604-5140 Fax Number: 501-604 5149 376-2147 688-8807 375-1027 374-4187 781-862-1955 682-2591 371-0100 375-1940 There are -,_,pages, including this Cover Sheet, being sent by this facsimile transmission. MESSAGE SENT BY: Office of Judge Wm U.S. District Court 600 West Capitol, Room 423 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 . Matt Morgan, LRSD Law Clerk 501-604-5141 PAGE 01/02 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER RECEIVED MAR 2 7 2007 OFRCtOF DEr!:~~U\\i\"i':.,.. :.;r:\"l'!'Off!NG PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Pending is Joshua Intervenors' Motion for Additional Time in which to File Notice of Appeal (Doc. No. 4105). Joshua is given to and including 12:00 noon, Thursday, April 5, 2007 within which to file a notice of appeal. This should give the intervenors ample time to weigh the relevant considerations. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2007. /s/ Wm. R. Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MIME-Version:1 . 0 From:ecf_ support@ared.uscourts . gov To : ared_ecf@localhost . localdomain a essage-Id:\u0026lt;872025@ared . uscourts . gov\u0026gt; W ee : Subject :Activity in Case 4:82- cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School , et al v . Pulaski Cty School , et al Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Content-Type : text/plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once wi thout charge . To avoid later charges , download a copy of each document during this first viewing . U. S . District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 3/26/2007 11 : 11 AM CDT and filed on 3/26/2007 Case Name : Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School , et al Case Number : 4 : 82-cv-866 http : / /ecf . ared . uscourts.gov/ cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer ~ WARNING : CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number : 4107 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document : http : //ecf.ared.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_ case_doc?4107 , 26052 ,, MAGIC ,,, 2005624 Docket Text : ORDER granting ( 4105] Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal ; Joshua is given to a nd including 12 : 00 noon , Thursday , April 5 , 2007 within which to file a notice of appeal . Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr . on 3/26/07. (mkf) 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to: A:layton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi . com - hilip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbml aw . net , nmo l er@kbmlaw.net Christopher J. He l ler heller@fec . net , brendak@fec . net , tmiller@fec . net M. Samuel Jones , III (Terminated) sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj . com, kate.jones@jlj . com, linda .calloway@jlj . com \\ John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol. com, jspringer@gabrielmail . com, lorap72297@aol . com  Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi . com John Clayburn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@comcast.net , yeldnef@yahoo . com Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardsori@arkansasag.gov, agcivil@arkansasag .gov, patsy . dooley@arkansasag . gov 4:82-cv- 866 Notice has been delivered by other means t o : . Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc . - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 . Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Atto rney General ' s Office Catlett- Pr i en Tower Building 323 Cente r Street Sui te 200 - Little Roc k, AR 72201 - 2610 James M. Llewell yn , Jr Thomps on \u0026amp; Llewe ll y n , P . A. Post Office Box 818 cort Smith, AR 72902-08 18 Office of Desegregation Moni to r One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 ~ ttle Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith , AR 72902-0818 The following ~ocument(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description : Main Document Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp : [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=l095794525 [Date=3/26/2007) [FileNumber=872024-0) [317a0cbedac4ald0bf5d26ac32314670103d8elca6e57249a36ac7a8b50b0ld7284fcl2f00fbbfe llc162 4b02853a0572ef935adbbc364371afbcf496f237239)) \\ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866-WRWIJTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER RECEIVED MAR 2 7 2007 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS  '\"INTERVENORS  INTERVENORS Based on the matters set forth in Joshua lntervenors' Motion for Reconsideration for Extension of Time Up to and Including 30 Days to File Notice of Appeal (Doc. No. 4109), Joshua's time is again extended to 12:00 noon, Monday, April 9, 2007 within which to file a notice of appeal. Mr. Walker and Mr. Pressman have had extensive experience in this type oflitigation and in,!his particular case. While the Order of February 23, 2007 1 is longer than the usual order entered by this Court, it is not, I believe, all that complicated for lawyers who have been involved in the litigation for such a len~h of time -- and the filing of a notice of appeal is a simple matter. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2007. Isl Wm. R. Wilson,Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 'Doc. No. 4103. MIME-Version:1 . 0 From : ecf_ support@ared . uscourts.gov To:ared_ ecf@localhost . localdomain Message-Id : \u0026lt;872438@ared . uscourts . gov\u0026gt; Alec: .,ubject:Activity in Case 4 : 82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School , et al v . Pulaski Cty School , et al Order on Motion for Reconsiderati on Content-Type: text / plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** There is no charge for viewing opinions . ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges , down l oad a copy of each document during this first viewing.U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 3 / 26 / 2007 3 : 03 PM CDT and filed on 3/26/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School , et al v . Pulaski Cty School , et al Case Number : 4 : 82-cv-866 http://ecf . ared.uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer : WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01 / 26/1998 Document Number : 4110 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the docume nt : http://ecf . ared . uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/ show_ case_ doc?4l10 , 26052,,MAGIC,,, 2005632 Docket Text : ORDER granting [4109) Motion for Reconsideration ; Joshua ' s time is again extended to 12 : 00 noon , Monday , April 9 , 2007 within which to file a notice of appeal . Signed by Judge Wi lliam R. Wilson Jr . on 3 / 26/07 . (mkf) 4 : 82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to: ~ layton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi . com Wphili p E. Kap l an pkaplan @kbml a w. net , nmoler@kbmlaw .net Christopher J. Heller heller@fec . net , brendak@fec.net, tmiller@fec.net M. Samue l Jones , III (Terminated) sjones@mwsgw . com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj . com, kate . jones@jlj. com, linda . calloway@jlj . com \\ John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol . com, j springer@gabrielmail . com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Bu rnette mburnette@mbbwi . com John Cl ayburn Fendley , Jr c l ayfendley@comcast.net , yeldnef@yahoo.com ~ Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, agc ivi l@arkansasag.gov , patsy . dooley@arkan sasag .gov 4 : 82-cv- 866 Notice has been delivered by other means to :Norman J . Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York , NY 10013 ~imothy Ge rard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General ' s Offi ce Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 - Little Rock, AR 72201 -2 610 J ames M. Llewe l lyn, Jr Thomps on \u0026amp; Llewe l l yn , P . A. Post Office Box 818 Fo r t Smith , AR 72902 -08 18 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 - ittle Rock , AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P . A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description : Main Document Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=3/26/2007] [FileNumber=872437-0] [b9a0174044707lc635647c060ac8605869149660906b84412eddll8e7761841722b72d3ccd8fc78 46lef08d8ac06f5ae4e4c3825b0b0189celdecaee8a00bede]] MIME-Version : 1 . 0 R~ From : ecf_support@ared.uscourts . gov ,;;CE/ll~D To:ared_ecf@localhost.localdomain Ve;, - ~~age-Id:\u0026lt;872743@ared.uscourts .gov\u0026gt; /.f. Subject :Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School,~~ ~.J!JO(}iulaski Cty School, et al Notice of Docket Correction OF~  Content-Type : text/plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS** JJESEOR~J\"-B;, the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges , downloact~~JN4ttON/ftf..,~ach document during this first viewing.U.S . District Court '~ Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 3/27/2007 8 : 10 AM CDT and filed on 3/27/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School , et al v . Pulaski Cty School , et al Case Number: 4 : 82-cv-866 http://ecf . ared . uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer : WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 4112 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document: http : / / ecf . ared.uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/show_ case_ doc?4ll2,26052,,MAGIC,, , 2005637 Docket Text : NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re : [4109] MOTION for Reconsideration . CORRECTION : The original document was submitted in error (illegible document format); the correct document was added to docket entry [4109] , based on the attached correspondence. (thd) 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to : A:1ayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi . com W hilip E . Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net , nmoler@kbmlaw . net Christophe r J. Heller heller@fec.net , brendak@fec.net, tmiller@fec .net M. Samue l J ones , III (Terminated) sj o nes@mwsgw . com, aoverton@mwsgw . com Stephen W. J ones sjones@jlj . com, kat e . jones@jlj . com, linda . calloway@jlj.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol. com, jspringer@gabrielmail . com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi . com John Cla y burn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@c omcast.net , yeldnef@yahoo . com Sc o t t Par is Richardson scott . richards o~\" @arkansasag . gov , agcivil@arkansasag.gov, patsy.dool ey@arkansasag.gov 4: 8 2-cv -8 66 Notice has been delivered by other means t o : Norman J . Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educationa l Fund, Inc . - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York , NY 10013 Ti mot hy Gerard Gauger Ark a nsa s At torney Genera l ' s Of fi ce Ca tlett -P rien Tower Bui lding 323 Center St reet Suite 200 - Little Roc k, AR 72201 -2 610 J ames M. Ll ewel l yn, J r Thomps on \u0026amp; Llewel l yn , P.A. Post Cffi~e Box 818 f o r t Smitb , AR 7 2902-08 18 Of fi~~ 0E De s e g r ega tion Mo ni to r One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 - ttle Rock, AR 72201 William P . Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A . Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith , AR 72902-0818 The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description: Main Document Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp : [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=1095794525 [Date=3/27/2007] [FileNumber=872742-0] [a2ff16c6503bf6f37ce6d846e18b46a2a71bb785564ba03f3defe925a6eebd7a57f7854b71d37dc 853a64aaf31c7af693c73a93le5del77b6a9a0780acf18605]]     Joy Springer\" \u0026lt;jspringer@gabrielmail.com\u0026gt; 03/26/2007 05:55 PM To \u0026lt;clerksoffice@ared.uscourts.gov\u0026gt; cc \u0026lt;cblackstock@mbbwi.com\u0026gt;, \"Philip Kaplan\" \u0026lt;pkaplan@kbmlaw.net\u0026gt;, \u0026lt;HELLER@fec.net\u0026gt;, \u0026lt;sjones@mwsgw.com\u0026gt;, \u0026lt;sjones@jlj.com\u0026gt;, bee Subject Little Rock School Distirct v. Pulaski County Special School District.et al. At Mr. Walker's request, I am resending the attached motion per your request. Looks like we are having problem with our Adobe. Thank you for your patience and cooperation. Joy Springer ., ' f:hif For John W. Walker Motion for Reconsideration.pdf ---------- ----- --------- ----~---------    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_863","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2007-01/2007-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/863"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n BOARD oF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA RECEIVED JAN1 7 2007 OfflCEOF DESEGREGOANTIITOONR ING ass North Little Rock School District Thursday, January 18, 2007 5:00 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, January 18, 2007 - 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Trent Cox, President II. INVOCATION, Marshalluna Land, NLRHS Senior, daughter of III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Trent Cox, President Scott Teague, Vice President Marty Moore, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Darrell Montgomery, Member Margo Tenner, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Special Recognition - S. Brazear 1. New National Board Certified Teachers Ms. Eldra Land a. Takecia Cox - Ridgeroad Middle Charter b. Kay Ewart - NLRHS West Campus c. Melissa Herring - Crestwood Elementary d. Kathy Holland- NLRHS West Campus e. Angie Hutson - NLRHS West Campus f. Jennifer Kimbrell - Crestwood Elementary g. Kendra Leirer - NLRHS East Campus - VI. Page 2 - Board Agenda January 18, 2007 DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:00 P.M. (Regular)-Page A - 1 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. B. C. D. E. F, G. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - M. Snider Consider Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report- G. Tucker Consider Revisions to Board Policies 4.22 Weapons and Dangerous Instruments and 4.43 Bullying - Page B - 1 - B. Acklin Consider Revisions to Board Policies 3.6 Certified Personnel Employee Training\n3.6 - CL Classified Personnel Employee Training\n5.4 Professional Development and 5 .15 Grading - Page C - 1 - A. 0 lsen Consider Elementary Textbook Committee's Recommendation - Page D - 1 - K. Lowe Consider Approval of Secondary Textbook Adoption Committee - Page E - 1 - R. Dickey Consider Crestwood Elementary Bid Proposal - Page F - 1 - J. Massey H. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page S - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Board Workshop - Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:00 A.M. B. Regular Board Meeting-Thursday, February 15, 2007 5 P.M. XI. XII. XIII. STUDENT EXPULSION Page 3 - Board Agenda January 18, 2007 SUPERINTENDENT'S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES December 14, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, December 14, 2006 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. Lynne Looney, NLRSD Teacher, addressed the Board to express her concerns about the hiring of administrators in the district. President Trent Cox called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Rebecca Galloway, Park Hill Elementary School fifth grader, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Trent Cox, President Scott Teague, Vice President Marty Moore, Secretary Dorothy Williams, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Darrell Montgomery, Member Absent Margo Tenner, Member Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDr. Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Superintendent's Honor Roll: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, introduced Dr. Macy Purtle, NLRHS West Campus media specialist, as a new member. Dr. Purtle was nominated by Anita Cameron, NLRHS West Campus Principal for her work with students and staff, her leadership in beginning several book clubs and her work with the remediation classes. John Riley presented Dr. Purtle with a plaque thanking her for her dedication to our district. Lisa Gray, Argenta Academy paraprofessional, nominated by A-1 Charles Jones, Argenta Academy principal, for her dedication to the Argenta students. Ms. Gray worked off contract this summer helping register students and is a great asset - for her work as Argenta's parent coordinator. Darrell Montgomery presented Ms. Gray with a plaque in appreciation for her work at Argenta Academy. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the minutes of the November 16, 2006 (Regular) meeting as printed. Scott Teague seconded the IJ?Otion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, and Williams None (Tenner - absent) OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Margie Snider, Certified Personnel Policies Committee Chair, stated the certified personnel had voted and approved the changes to Board Policy CA-Personnel Policies Committee and the teacher and administrator salary schedule revisions. Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report Glenda Tucker, Classified Personnel Policies Committee Chair, stated the classified personnel had voted and approved all of the classified salary schedule revisions. Mrs. Tucker stated the committee proposed to add Board Policy CEB Personal Leave as a classified policy adding CL to the title with the following revisions: adding the words \"or building administrator\" in the first sentence of the second paragraph after the word \"principal\"\ninserting the following sentence as the fifth sentence of the paragraph: \"Part time employee(s) personal leave will be prorated according to the number of hours worked per day\"\nand to delete the sentence \"This policy does not apply to twelve month Administrative personnel.\" from the end of the policy. MOTION John Riley moved to return policy CFEB - CL to the Classified Personnel Policies Committee for modifications of the revisions. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, and Williams None (Tenner- absent) A-2 Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel requested approval of the consent agenda as printed on pages O - 1 through T- 17. MOTION John Riley moved for the Board to enter into executive session. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, and Williams None (Tenner- absent) The Board entered into an executive session at 5:23 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 5.35 p.m. MOTION Darrell Montgomery moved to accept the consent agenda as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, and Williams None (Tenner - absent) INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Jerry Massey, Plant Services Director, updated the Board on the proposed construction projects of Lakewood Middle School and Crestwood Elementary. He stated the Lakewood Middle School bids would be ready and in order for the February Board meeting. Mr. Massey explained that bids for Crestwood Elementary addition would be opened on January 9, 2007 and he would bring a recommendation at the January Board meeting. He stated an appeal has been filed for additional monies due to the work that needs be done on the slope of the ground at Crestwood Elementary. The Board agreed to set a Board Workshop on Saturday, January 27, 2007 at 9 a.m. at the J.W. Nutt Company on Crestwood Road. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Marty Moore moved to adjourn the meeting. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Cox, Montgomery, Moore, Riley, Teague, and Williams None (Tenner - absent) President Cox declared the meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. A-3 Trent Cox, President Marty Moore, Secretary A-4 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 4.22-WEAPONS AND DANGEROUS INSTRUMENTS No student shall possess a weapon, display what appears to be a weapon, or threaten to use a weapon while in school, on or about school property, before or after school, in attendance at school or any school sponsored activity, en route to or from school or any school sponsored activity, off the school grounds at any school bus stop, or at any school sponsored activity or event. Military personnel, such as ROTC cadets, acting in the course of their official duties are excepted. A weapon is defined as any knife, gun, pistol, revolver, shotgun, BB gun, rifle, pellet gun, raz.or, ice pick, dirk, box cutter, nun chucks, pepper spray or other noxious spray, explosive, or any other instrument or substance capable of causing bodily harm. Possession means having a weapon, as defined in this policy, on the student's body or in an area under his/her control. If, prior to any questioning or search by any school personnel, a student discovers that he/she has accidentally brought a weapon to school including a weapon that is in a vehicle on school grounds, and the student informs the principal or a staff person immediately, the student will not be considered to be in possession of a weapon. The weapon shall be confiscated and held in the office until such time as the student's parent/legal guardian shall pick up the weapon from the school's office. Repeated offenses are unacceptable and shall be grounds for disciplinary action against the student as otherwise provided for in this policy. Students found to be in possession on the school campus of a fireann shall be recommended for expulsion for a period of not less than one year. The School Board shall have the discretion to modify such expulsion recommendation for a student on a case-by-case basis. By using the case by case exception, the School Board will be able to discipline students with disabilities in accordance with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Parents or legal guardians of students expelled under this policy shall be given a copy of the current laws regarding the possibility of parental responsibility for allowing a child to possess a weapon on school property. Parents or legal guardians shall sign a statementa cknowledgingt hat they have read and understands aid laws prior to readmitting the student. Parents or legal guardians of a student enrolling from another school after the expiration of an expulsion period for a weapons policy violation shall also be given a copy of the current laws regarding the possibility of parental responsibility for allowing a child to possess a weapon on school property.T he parentso r legal guardianss hall sign a statementa cknowledgingth at they have read and understand said laws prior to the student being enrolled in school. A report will be given to the North Little Rock Police Department and criminal charges may be filed following an investigation. Legal References: AC.A. 6-18-502 (c) (2)(A)(B) AC.A. 6-18-507 (e) (1)(2) AC.A.  6 17 113 AC.A.  5-27-206 20 uses 8921 Date Adopted: 9/26/95 Last Revised: 12/18/03 B-1 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 4.22-WEAPONS AND DANGEROUS INSTRUMENTS No student shall possess a weapon, display what appears to be a weapon, or threaten to use a weapon while in school, on or about school property, before or after school, in attendance at school or any school sponsored activity, en route to or from school or any school sponsored activity, off the school grounds at any school bus stop, or at any school sponsored activity or event. A weapon is defined as any knife, gun, pistol, revolver, shotgun, BB gun, rifle, pellet gun, razor, ice pick, dirk, box cutter, nun chucks, pepper spray or other noxious spray, explosive, or any other instrument or substance capable of causing bodily harm. Possession means having a weapon, as defined in this policy, on the student's body or in an area under his/her control. If, prior to any questioning or search by any school personnel, a student discovers that he/she has accidentallyb rought a weapon to school includinga weapon that is in a vehicle on school grounds, and the student informs the principal or a staff person immediately, the student will not be considered to be in possession of a weapon. The weapon shall be confiscated and held in the office until such time as the student's parent/legal guardian shall pick up the weapon from the school's office. Repeated offenses are unacceptable and shall be grounds for disciplinary action against the student as otherwise provided for in this policy. Students found to be in possession on the school campus of a firearm shall be recommended for expulsion for a period of not less than one year. The School Board shall have the discretion to modify such expulsion recommendationf or a student on a case-by-caseb asis. Parents or legal guardians of students expelled under this policy shall be given a copy of the current laws regarding the possibility of - parental responsibilityf or allowing a child to possess a weapon on school property. Parents or legal guardians shall sign a statementa cknowledgingt hat they have read and understands aid laws prior to readmitting the student. Parents or legal guardians of a student enrolling from another school after the expiration of an expulsion period for a weapons policy violation shall also be given a copy of the current laws regarding the. possibilityo f parental responsibilityf or allowing a child to possess a weapon on school property.T he parentso r legal guardianss hall sign a statementa cknowledgingth at they have read and understand said laws prior to the student being enrolled in school. A report will be given to the North Little Rock Police Department and criminal charges may be filed following an investigation. Legal References: A.CA 6-18-502 (c) (2)(A)(B) AC.A. 6-18-507 (e) (1)(2) AC.A. 6-17-113 20 uses  8921 Date Adopted: 9/26/95 Last Revised: 12/18/03 B-2 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADD~TIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 4.43-BULL YING Respect for the dignity of others is a cornerstone of civil society. Bullying creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, robs a person of their dignity, detracts from the safe environment necessary to promote student learning, and will not be tolerated by the Board of Directors. Students who bully another person shall be held accountable for their actions whether it occurs on the school grounds\noff school grounds at a school sponsored or approved function, activity, or event\nor going to or from school or a school activity in a school vehicle or school bus\nor at designated school bus stops. Definition: Bullying is any pattern of behavior by a student, or a group of students, that is intended to harass, intimidate, ridicule, humiliate, or instill fear in another child or group of children. Bullying behavior can be a threat of, or actual, physical harm or it can be verbal abuse of the child. Bullying also includes unacceptable behavior identified in this policy which is electronically transmitted. Bullying is a series of recurring actions committed over a period of time directed toward one student, or successive, separate actions directed against multiple students. Examples of \"bullying\" may include but are not limited to a pattern of behavior involving one or more of the following: I. Sarcastic \"compliments\" about another student's personal appearance\n2. Pointed questions intended to embarrass or humiliate\n3. Mocking, taunting or belittling\n4. Non-verbal threats and/or intimidation such as \"fronting\" or \"chesting\" a person\n5. Demeaning humor relating to a student's race, gender, ethnicity or personal characteristics\n6. Blackmail, extortion, demands for protection money or other involuntary donations or loans\n7. Blocking access to school property or facilities\n8. Deliberate physical contact or injury to person or property\n9. Stealing or hiding books or belongings\nand/or 10. Threats of harm to student(s), possessions, or others. B-3 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 Students are encouraged to report behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, to their teacher or the building principal. The report may be made anonymously. Teachers and other school employees who have witnessed, or are reliably informed that, a student has been a victim of behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, shall report the incident(s) to the principal. Parents or legal guardians may submit to the principal written reports of incidents they feel constitute bullying, or if allowed to continue wottld constitute bullying. The principal shall be responsible for investigating the incident( s) to determine if disciplinary action is warranted. The person or persons r@rting behavior they consider to be bullying shall not be subject to retaliation or reprisal in any form. Students found to be in violation of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. In determining the appropriate disciplinary action, consideration may be given to other violations of the student handbook which may have simultaneously occurred. Notice of what constitutes bullying, the District's prohibition against bullying, and the consequences for students who bully shall be conspicuously posted in every classroom, cafeteria, restroom, gymnasium, auditorium, and school bus. Parents, students, school volunteers, and employees shall be given copies of the notice. Copies of this policy shall be available upon request. Legal Reference: Act 681 of2003 A.C.A.  6-18-514 Last Revised: 12/18/03 B-4 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 4.43-BULL YING Respect for the dignity of others is a cornerstone of civil society. Bullying creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, robs a person of their dignity, detracts from the safe environment necessary to promote student learning, and will not be tolerated by the Board of Directors. Students who bully another person shall be held accountable for their actions whether it occurs on the school grounds\noff school grounds at a school sponsored or approved function, activity, or event\nor going to or from school or a school activity. Definition: Bullying is any pattern of behavior by a student, or a group of students, that is intended to harass, intimidate, ridicule, humiliate, or instill fear in another child or group of children. Bullying behavior can be a threat of, or actual, physical harm or it can be verbal abuse of the child. Bullying is a series of recurring actions committed over a period of time directed toward one student, or successive, separate actions directed against multiple students. Examples of \"bullying\" may include but are not limited to a pattern of behavior involving one or more of the following: 1. Sarcastic \"compliments\" about another student's personal appearance\n2. Pointed questions intended to embarrass or humiliate\n3. Mocking, taunting or belittling\n4. Non-verbal threats and/or intimidation such as \"fronting\" or \"chesting\" a person\n5. Demeaning humor relating to a student's race, gender, ethnicity or personal characteristics\n6. Blackmail, extortion, demands for protection money or other involuntary donations or loans\n7. Blocking access to school property or facilities\n8. Deliberate physical contact or injury to person or property\n9. Stealing or hiding books or belongings\nand/or 10. Threats of harm to student(s), possessions, or others. B-5 Students are encouraged to report behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, to their teacher or the building principal. 4 report may be made anonymously. Teachers and other school employees who have witnessed, or are reliably informed that, a student has been a victim of behavior they consider to be bullying, including a single action which if allowed to continue would constitute bullying, shall report the incident(s) to the principal. Parents or legal guardians may submit to the principal written reports of incidents they feel constitute bullying, or if allowed to continue would constitute bullying. The principal shall be responsible for investigating the incident(s) to determine if disciplinary action is warranted. Students found to be in violation of this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including expulsion. In determining the appropriate disciplinary action, consideration may be given to other violations of the student handbook which may have simultaneously occurred. Notice of what constitutes bullying, the District's prohibition against bullying, and the consequences for students who bully shall be conspicuously posted in every classroom, cafeteria, restroom, gymnasium, auditorium, and school bus. Parents, students, school volunteers, and employees shall be given copies of the notice. Legal Reference: Act 681 of2003 Last Revised: 12/18/03 B-6 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 3.6- CERI'IF'IEDP ERSONNELE MPLOYEET RAINING The district administration and the building principal have the authority to require attendance at specific professional development activities in conjunction with state law and ADE Rules Governing Professional Development. PD PLAN The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its certified employees. The district's plan shall, in part, align district resources to address the professional development activities identified in each school's ACSIP. Each certified employee shall receive a minimum of sixty (60) hours of professional development annually which must be approved b( the district and :fulfilled between July 1 !lfid Me 30 or Jlllle 1 and May 31, to be determiRed annually. Professional development hours earned in excess of sixty ( 60) in the designated year cannot be carried over to the next year. The goal of all professional development activities shall be improved student achievement and academic performance that results in individual, school-wide, and system-wide improvement designed to ensure that all students demonstrate proficiency on the state criterion-referenced assessments. The district's professional development plan shall demonstrate scientifically research-based best practice, and shall be based on student achievement data and in alignment with the ADE Rules Governing Professional Development and current Arkansas code. Teachers and administrators shall be involved in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the plan for their own professional development. The results of the evaluation made by the participants in each program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to - revise the school improvement plan. PD FLEX Flexible professional development hours (flex hours) are those hours which an employee is allowed to substitute professional development activities, different than those offered by the district, but which still meet criteria of either the employee's Individual Improvement Plan or the school's ACSIP, or both. The district shall determine on an annual basis how many, if any, flex hours of professional development it will allow to be substituted for district scheduled professional development offerings. The determination may be made at an individual building, a grade, or by subject basis. Employees must receive advance approval from the building principal or district designee for activities they wish to have qualify for flex professional development hours. To the fullest extent possible, professional development activities are to be scheduled and attended such that teachers do not miss their regular teaching assignments. Six (6) approved flex hours credited toward fulfilling the sixty (60) hour requirement shall equal one contract day. Hours of professional development earned by an employee in excess of sixty (60) or not pre-approved by the building principal shall not be credited toward fulfilling the required number of contract days for that employee. Hours earned that count toward the required sixty (60) also count toward the required number of contract days for that employee. C-1 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 PD MAKEUP Teachers and administrators who, for any reason, miss part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, must make up the required hours in comparable activities which are to be pre-approved by the building principal or district designee. PD CREDIT To receive credit for his/her professional development activity each employee is responsible for obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentation is to be submitted to the building principal or district designee. REQUIRED PD SESSIONS Teachers and administrators are required to obtain sixty (60) hours of approved professional development annually over a five-year period as part oflicensure renewal requirements. At least six (6) of the sixty (60) annual hours shall be in the area of educational technology. Teachers are required to receive at least two hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies. Teachers who provide instruction in Arkansas history shall receive at least two (2) hours of professional development in Arkansas history as part of the sixty (60) hours required annually. Teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management and health and physical activity annually. Administrators are required to receive at least three hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies and the importance of administrative leadership in setting expectations and creating a climate conducive to parental participation. Each administrator's professional development is required to also include training in data disaggregation, instructional leadership, and fiscal management ADDIDONALPDOPPORTUNITIES Each hour of approved training received by certified personnel related to teaching an advance placement class for a subject covered by the College Board or Educational Testing Service, shall receive up to thirty (30) hours of credit which may be applied toward the sixty (60) hours of professional development required annually. Certified personnel may be entitled to up to twelve (12) hours of professional development for time spent planning and preparing curriculum or developing other instructional materials in their instructional classroom, office or media center prior to the first day of student/teacher interaction provided the time is spent in accordance with the state law and current ADE rules that deal with professional development. C-2 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 Certified personnel are eligible to receive fifteen (15) professional development hours for a college course 1hat meets the criteria identified in law and the applicable ADE rules. Upon ADE approval, the district shall determine if the hours earned apply toward the required sixty (60). A maximum of thirty (30) hours may be applied toward the sixty ( 60) hours of professional development required annually. PD DOCUMENTATION Employees who do not receive or furnish documentation of the required annual professional development jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employee to receive sixty (60) hours of professional development in any given year may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. APPROVED PD ACTMTIES AND AREAS Approved professional development activities may include conferences, workshops, institutes, individual learning, mentoring, peer coaching, study groups, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification, distance learning, internships, district/school programs, and approved college/university course work. Professional development activities should be consistent with the objectives developed by the National Staff Development Council Standards. Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content (K-12)\ninstructional strategies\nassessment\nadvocacy/leadership\nsystemic change process\nstandards, frameworks, and curriculum alignment\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of learning/developmental stages\ncognitive research\nand building a collaborative learning community. Nete!r.-1 The Rules Goerrnng Professional DeelOJ3men4t .02 require the district to ehoose the option it will follow and \"doeument'' its ehoice. The documentation may be noted by the selection chosen for this policy aad also iH the district's ''plea\" for professional deelopment required b~ A.C.A.  6 17 704(e)(l). Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy 5.4- PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules Governing Professional Development A.CA. 6-15-404(f)(2) AC.A. 6-17-703 AC.A. 6-17-704 A.CA. 6-17-705 A.CA. 6-15-1004(c) AC.A. 6-15-1703 A.CA. 6-20-2303(14) Date Adopted: March 21, 2005 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-3 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 3.6-- CERTIFIED PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE TRAINING The district administrationa nd the buildingp rincipalh ave the authorityt o require attendancea t specific professionald evelopmenta ctivitiesi n conjunctionw ith state law and ADE Rules GoverningP rofessional Development. PD PLAN The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its certified employees.T he district'sp lan shall,i n part, align districtr esourcest o addresst he professionald evelopment activitiesi dentifiedi n each school's ACSIP.E ach pertifiede mployees hall receivea minimumo f sixty (6 0) hours of professional development annually which must be approved by the district and fulfilled between July 1 and June 30 or June 1 and May 31, to be determined annually. 1 Professional development hours earnedi n excesso f sixty (60) in the designatedy ear cannotb e carriedo ver to the next year. The goal of all professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hallb e improveds tudenta chievementa nd academicp erformancet hat results in individual, school-wide, and system-wide improvement designed to ensure that all students demonstrate proficiency on the state criterion-referenced assessments. The district's professional developmentp lan shall demonstrates cientificallyr esearch-basedb est practice, and shall be based on studenta chievementd ata and in alignmentw ith the ADE Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopmenta nd current Arkansas code. Teachersa nd administrators hallb e involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professional development. The results of the evaluation made by the participants in each program shall be used to continuouslyi mprove the district's professionald evelopmento fferingsa nd to reviset he schooli mprovemenpt lan. PD FLEX Flexible professional development hours (flex hours) are those hours which an employee is allowed to substitute professional development activities, different than those offered by the district, but which still meet criteria of either the employee's Individual Improvement Plan or the school's ACSIP, or both. The districts hall determineo n an annualb asis how many, if any, flex hours of professionald evelopmenti t will allow to be substitutedf or districts cheduledp rofessionald evelopmento fferings.T he determinationm ay be made at an individualb uilding,a grade,o r by subjectb asis. Employeesm ust receivea dvancea pproval from the buildingp rincipalo r districtd esigneef or activitiest hey wish to have qualifyf or flex professional developmenth ours. To the fulleste xtentp ossible,p rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitiesa re to be scheduled and attendeds uch that teachersd o not miss their regulart eachinga ssignments.S ix (6 ) approvedf lex hours credited toward fulfilling the sixty (60) hour requirement shall equal one contract day. Hours of professionald evelopmente arned by an employee in excess of sixty (60) or not pre-approved~ byt he building principal shall not be credited toward fulfilling the required number of contract days for that employee. Hours earned that count toward the required sixty (60) also count toward the required number of contract days for that employee. PD MAKEUP Teachers and administrators who, for any reason, miss part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, must make up the required hours in comparable activitiesw hich are to be pre-approvedb y the buildingp rincipalo r districtd esignee. C-4 CURRENT BOARD POLICY PD CREDIT To receive credit for his/her professional development activity each employee is responsible for obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentation is to be submitted to the building principal or district designee. REQUIRED PD SESSIONS Teachers and administrators are required to obtain sixty (60) hours of approved professional development annually over a five-year period as part oflicensure renewal requirements. At least six (6) of the sixty (60) annual hours shall be in the area of educational technology. Teachers are required to receive at least two hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies. Teachers who provide instruction in Arkansas history shall receive at least two (2) hours of professional development in Arkansas history as part of the sixty (60) hours required annually. Teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management and health and physical activity annually. Administrators are required to receive at least three hours annually of their sixty ( 60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies and the importance of administrative leadership in setting expectations and creating a climate conducive to parental participation. Each administrator's professional development is required to also include training in data disaggregation, instructional leadership, and fiscal management. ADDITIONAL PD OPPORTUNITIES Each hour of approved training received by certified personnel related to teaching an advance placement class for a subject covered by the College Board or Educational Testing Service, shall receive up to thirty (30) hours of credit which may be applied toward the sixty (60) hours of professional development required annually. Certified personnel may be entitled to up to twelve (12) hours of professional development for time spent planning and preparing curriculum or developing other instructional materials in their instructional classroom, office or media center prior to the first day of student/teacher interaction provided the time is spent in accordance with the state law and current ADE rules that deal with professional development Certified personnel are eligible to receive fifteen (15) professional development hours for a college course that meets the criteria identified in law and the applicable ADE rules. Upon ADE approval, the district shall determine if the hours earned apply toward the required sixty (60). A maximum of thirty (30) hours may be applied toward the sixty (60) hours of professional development required annually. C-5 CURRENT BOARD POLICY PD DOCUMENTATION Employees who do not receive or furnish documentation of the required annual professional development - jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employee to receive sixty (60) hours of professional development in any given year may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. APPROVED PD ACTMTIES AND AREAS Approved professional development activities may include conferences, workshops, institutes, individual learning, mentoring, peer coaching, study groups, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification, distance learning, internships, district1/schoolp rograms, and approved college/university course work. Professional development activities should be consistent with the objectives developed by the National Staff Development Council Standards. Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content (K-12)\ninstructional strategies\nassessment\nadvocacy/leadership\nsystemic change process\nstandards, frameworks, and curriculum alignment\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of learning/developmental stages\ncognitive research\nand building a collaborative learning community. Notes: 1 The Rules Governing Professional Development 4.02 require the district to choose the option it will follow and \"document'' its choice. The documentation may be noted by the selection chosen for this policy and also in the distrjct's ''plan\" for professional development required by A.C.A.  6-17-704(c)(l). - Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy 5.4- STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules Governing Professional Development A.C.A.  6-15-404()(2) A.C.A.  6-17-703 A.CA. 6-17-704 A.C.A.  6-17-705 A.C.A.  6-15-1004(c) A.C.A.  6-15-1703 A.C.A.  6-20-2303(14) Date Adopted: March 21, 2005 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-6 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 3.6 CL- CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE TRAINING All employeess hall attenda ll districtp rofessionald evelopments essionsa s directedb y a supervisor. The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its classified employees. The district's plan shall, in part, align district resources to address the professional development activities identified in each school's ACSIP. Each classified employee shall participate in professional development annually designed by the district as it pertains to each department's needs. The professional development is to be fulfilled between July 1 and June 30 or June 1 and May 31, to be detennined ar.IR-Jal1l y. The district's plan shall be in alignment with the ADE Rules Governing Professional Development and current Arkansas code. Representativeso f each departments hall be involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professionald evelopmentT. he resultso f the evaluationm ade by the participantsi n each program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to revise the schooli mprovementp lan. Classifiede mployeesa re not eligiblef or flexiblep rofessionald evelopmenth ours (flex hours) The dis1rict administrationa nd the departmentd irectorsh ave the authorityt o requirea ttendancea t specificp rofessional development activities. If a classified employee, for any reason, misses part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, they must make up the required hours in comparable activities which are to be pre-approvedb y the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. To receive credit for his/herp rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitye ach employeei s responsiblef or obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentationi s to be submittedt o the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. The chief financiala nd informations erviceso fficer and the administratived irectoro f finance, audit, and purchasing are required to obtain 4 hours of professional development in fiscal management annually. Other classified employees who manage substantial budgets are required to obtain training in fiscal management as well with the exception of a time requirement. All classified employees inclusive of substitute teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management annually. Employeesw ho do not receive or furnishd ocumentationo f the requireda nnualp rofessionald evelopment jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employeet o attendr equiredp rofessionald evelopmenti n any given year shall be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. C-7 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 Approved professional development activities may include conferences, workshops, institutes, individual learning,m entoring,p eer coaching,s tudy groups,d istancel earning,i nternships,d istrict/schoopl rograms, and approved college/universityco urse work Professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hould be consistent with the objectivesd evelopedb y the NationalS taffD evelopmenCt ouncilS tandards. Professional development activities shall relate to' the following areas: content\nadvocacy/leadership\nsystemic change process\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of learning/developmentaslt ages\nc ognitiver esearch\na nd buildinga collaborativele arningc ommunity. Netw.-1- The Rules GoverningP ffifessionaDl eo\nelopmen4t .02 require the districtt o choose the option it will followa nd \"doeument''i ts ehoiee.T he doeumootatiOmB ay be noted by the selectione hosen fur this policy and also in the district's ''plan\" for professionald e,,,elopmenrte quiredb y AC.A.  6 17 704(e)(l). Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy5 .4- ProfessionaDl evelopment ArkansasS tateB oard ofEducation:S tandardso f Accreditation1 5.04 ADE RulesG overningP rofessionaDl evelopment Date Adopted: December 15, 2005 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-8 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 3.6 CL- PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT All employeess hall attenda ll districtp rofessionald evelopments essionsa s directedb y a supervisor. The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its classified employees. The district's plan shall, in part, align district resources to address the professional development activities identified in each school's ACSIP. Each classified employee shall participate in professional development annually designed by the district as it pertains to each department's needs. The professional development is to be fulfilled between July 1 and June 30 or June 1 and May 31, to be determined annually: The district's plan shall be in alignment with the ADE Rules Governing Professional Development and current Arkansas code. Representativeso f each departments hall be involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professionald evelopment.T he results of the evaluationm ade by the participantsi n each program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to reviset he schooli mprovemenpt lan. Classified employees are not eligible for flexible professional development hours (flex hours) The district administrationa nd the departmentd irectorsh ave the authorityt o requirea ttendancea t specificp rofessional development activities. If a classified employee, for any reason, misses part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, they must make up the required hours in comparable activities which are to be pre-approvedb y the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. To receive credit for his/her professional development activity each employee is responsible for obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentationi s to be submittedt o the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. The chief financiala nd informations erviceso fficer and the administratived irector of finance, audit, and purchasing are required to obtain 4 hours of professional development in fiscal management annually. Other classified employees who manage substantial budgets are required to obtain training in fiscal management as well with the exception of a time requirement. All classified employees inclusive of substitute teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management annually. Employeesw ho do not receive or furnish documentationo f the requireda nnual professionald evelopment jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employee to attend required professional development in any given year shall be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. Approved professionald evelopmenta ctivitiesm ay include conferences,w orkshops,i nstitutes,i ndividual learning,m entoring,p eer coaching,s tudy groups, distancel earning,i nternships,d istrict/schoolp rograms, and approved college/universityc ourse work. Professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hould be consistent with the objectives developed by the National Staff Development Council Standards. C-9 CURRENT BOARD POLICY Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content\nadvocacy/leadershipA\nsystemic change process\nsupervision\nmentoring,'coaching\ne ducational technology\nprinciples of W learning,'developmentsatla ges\nc ognitiver esearch\na nd buildinga collaborativel earningc ommunity. Notes: 1 The Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopment4 .02 require the district to choose the option it will follow and \"document''i ts choice.T he documentationm ay be noted by the selectionc hosen for this policy and also in the district's' 'plan\" for professionald evelopmentr equiredb y A.CA.  6-17-704(cX1). Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy 5.4--STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopment Date Adopted: December 15, 2005 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-10 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 3.6 CL- CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE TRAJNING All employeess hall attenda ll districtp rofessionald evelopments essionsa s directedb y a supervisor. The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its classified employees.T he district'sp lan shall,i n part, align districtr esourcest o addresst he professionald evelopment activities identified in each school's ACSIP. Each classified employee shall participate in professional development annually designed by the district as it pertains to each department's needs. The professional development is to be fulfilled between July 1 and June 30 or June 1 and May 31, to be determined annually.1 The district's plan shall be in alignment with the ADE Rules Governing Professional Development and current Arkansas code. Representativeso f each departments hall be involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professionald evelopmentT he resultso f the evaluationm ade by the participantsi n each program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to reviset he schooli mprovemenpt lan. Classifiede mployeesa re not eligiblef or flexiblep rofessionald evelopmenth ours (flex hours) The district administrationa nd the departmentd irectorsh ave the authorityt o requirea ttendancea t specificp rofessional development activities. If a classified employee, for any reason, misses part or all of any scheduled professional development activityt hey were requiredt o attend,t hey must make up the requiredh ours in comparablea ctivitiesw hich are to be pre-approvedb y the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. To receivec redit for his/herp rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitye ach employeei s responsiblef or obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Docwnentationi s to be submittedt o the departmentd irectoro r districtd esignee. The chief :financiaal nd informations erviceso fficera nd the administratived irectoro f finance,a udit, and purchasing are required to obtain 4 hours of professional development in fiscal management annually. Other classified employees who manage substantial budgets are required to obtain training in fiscal management as well with the exception of a time requirement All classified employees inclusive of substitute teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management annually. Employeesw ho do not receiveo r furnishd ocumentationo f the requireda nnualp rofessionald evelopment jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employeet o attend requiredp rofessionald evelopmenti n any given year shall be groundsf or disciplinary action up to and including termination. Approvedp rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitiesm ay include conferences,w orkshops,i nstitutes,i ndividual learning,m entoring,p eer coaching,s tudy groups,d istancel earning,i nternshipsd, istrict/schoopl rograms, and approvedc ollege/universityco urse work. Professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hould be consistent with the objectivesd evelopedb y the NationalS taffD evelopmentC ouncilS tandards. C-9 CURRENT BOARD POLICY Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content\nadvocacy/leadership\nA systemic change process\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of W learning/developmental stages\ncognitive research\nand building a collaborative learning community. Notes: 1 The Rules Governing Professional Development 4.02 require the district to choose the option it will follow and \"document'' its choice. The documentation may be noted by the selection chosen for this policy and also in the district's \"plan\" for professional development required by A.CA.  6-l 7-704(c)(l). Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy 5.4-- STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules Governing Professional Development Date Adopted: December 15, 2005 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-10 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 5.4-- PROFESSIONALD EVELOPMENT The district administrationa nd the buildingp rincipalh ave the authorityt o require attendance at specific professionald evelopmenta ctivitiesi n conjunctionw ith state law and ADE Rules GoverningP rofessional Development. PD PLAN The District shall develop and implement a plan for the professional development of its certified employees.T he district'sp lan shall,i n part, align districtr esourcest o addresst he professionald evelopment activitiesi dentifiedi n each school's ACSIP.E ach certifiede mployees hall receivea minimumo f sixty (60) hours of professionald evelopmenta nnuallyw hich must be approvedb r the district and :fulfilledb etween My 1 aad June 30 or June 1 and May 31, to be determined annually. Professional development hours earned in excesso f sixty (60) in the designatedy ear cannotb e carried over to the next year. The goal of all professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hallb e improveds tudenta chievementa nd academicp erformancet hat results in individual, school-wide, and system-wide improvement designed to ensure that all students demonstrate proficiency on the state criterion-referenced assessments. The district's professional developmentp lan shall demonstrates cientificallyr esearch-basedb est practice, and shall be based on studenta chievementd ata and in alignmentw ith the ADE Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopmenta nd current Arkansas code. Teachersa nd administratorss hall be involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professional development. The results of the evaluation made by the participants in each program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to revise the schooli mprovemenpt lan. PD FLEX Flexible professional development hours (flex hours) are those hours which an employee is allowed to substitute professional development activities, different than those offered by the district, but which still meet criteria of either the employee's Individual Improvement Plan or the school's ACSIP, or both. The districts hall determineo n an annualb asis how many, if any, flex hours of professionald evelopmenti t will allow to be substituted for district scheduled professional development offerings. The determination may be made at an individual building, a grade, or by subject basis. Employees most receive advance approval from the buildingp rincipalo r districtd esigneef or activitiest hey wish to have qualifyf or flex professional development hours. To the fullest extent possible, professional development activities are to be scheduled and attendeds uch that teachersd o not miss their regulart eachinga ssignments.S ix (6 ) approvedf lex hours credited toward fulfilling the sixty (60) hour requirement shall equal one contract day. Hours of professional development earned by an employee in excess of sixty (60) or not pre-approved by the building principal shall not be credited toward fulfilling the required number of contract days for that employee. Hours earned that count toward the required sixty (60) also count toward the required number of contract days for that employee. C-11 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 PD MAKEUP Teachers and administrators who, for any reason, miss part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, must make up the required hours in comparable activities which are to be pre-approved by the building principal or district designee. PD CREDIT To receive credit for his/her professional development activity each employee is responsible for obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentation is to be submitted to the building principal or district designee. REQUIRED PD SESSIONS Teachers and administrators are required to obtain sixty (60) hours of approved professional development annually over a five-year period as part oflicensure renewal requirements. At least six (6) of the sixty (60) annual hours shall be in the area of educational technology. Teachers are required to receive at least two hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies. Teachers who provide instruction in Arkansas history shall receive at least two (2) hours of professional A development in Arkansas history as part of the sixty ( 60) hours required annually. W Teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management and health and physical activity annually. ' Administrators are required to receive at least three hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies and the importance of administrative leadership in setting expectations and creating a climate conducive to parental participation. Each administrator's professional development is required to also include training in data disaggregation, instructional leadership, and fiscal management. ADDIDONAL PD OPPORTUNITIES Each hour of approved training received by certified personnel related to teaching an advance placement class for a subject covered by the College Board or Educational Testing Service, shall receive up to thirty (30) hours of credit which may be applied toward the sixty (60) hours of professional development required annually. Certified personnel may be entitled to up to twelve (12) hours of professional development for time spent planning and preparing curriculum or developing other instructional materials in their instructional classroom, office or media center prior to the first day of student/teacher interaction provided the time is spent in accordance with the state law and current ADE rules that deal with professional development. C-12 . . . PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 Certified personnel are eligible to receive fifteen (15) professional development hours for a college course that meets the criteria identified in law and the applicable ADE rules. Upon ADE approval, the district shall determine if the hours earned apply toward the required sixty (60). A maximum of thirty (30) hours may be applied toward the sixty ( 60) hours of professional development required annually. PD DOCUMENTATION Employees who do not receive or furnish documentation of the required annual professional development jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employee to receive sixty (60) hours of professional development in any given year may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination. APPROVED PD ACTMTIES AND AREAS Approved professional development activities may include conferences, workshops, institutes, individual learning, mentoring, peer coaching, study groups, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification, distance learning, internships, district/school programs, and approved college/university course work Professional development activities should be consistent with the objectives developed by the National Staff Development Council Standards. Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content (K-12)\ninstructional strategies\nassessment\nadvocacy/leadership\nsystemic change process\nstandards, frameworks, and curriculum alignment\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of learning/developmental stages\ncognitive research\nand building a collaborative learning community. Nete\u0026amp;.--T-1h e Rules Govemmg Professional Development 4.02 reqtJiret he distriet to ehoose the option it will follow and \"doeument'' its ehoiee. The doeU1Hentatiomn ay be noted by the selection ehosen for this policy and also in the district's ''plan\" for pFOfessiona:d1e velopment required by A.C.A.  6 17 704(e)(l). Cross-Reference: Policy 3.6 - CERTIFIED PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE TRAINING Policy 3.6 - CL CLASSISIFED PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE TRAINING Legal References: Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules Governing Professional Development A.CA. 6-15-404(f)(2) A.CA 6-17-703 A.CA 6-17-704 A.CA 6-17-705 A.CA 6-15-1004(c) A.CA 6-15-1703 A.CA 6-20-2303(14) Date Adopted: June 26, 1986 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-13 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 5.4-PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The district administrationa nd the buildingp rincipalh ave the authorityt o require attendancea t specific professionald evelopmenta ctivitiesi n conjunctionw ith state law and ADE Rules GoverningP rofessional Development PD PLAN The District shall develop and implement a plan, for the professional development of its certified employees.T he district'sp lan shall,i n part, alignd istrictr esourcest o addresst he professionald evelopment activitiesi dentifiedi n each school's ACSIP.E ach certifiede mployees hall receivea minimumo f sixty (60) hours of professional development annually which must be approved by the district and fulfilled between July I and June 30 or June I and May 31, to be determined annually.1 Professional development hours earnedi n excesso f sixty (60) in the designatedy ear cannotb e carriedo ver to the next year. The goal of all professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess hall be improveds tudenta chievementa nd academicp erformancet hat results in individual, school-wide, and system-wide improvement designed to ensure that all students demonstrate proficiency on the state criterion-referenceda ssessments. The district's professional development plan shall demonstrates cientificallyr esearch-basedb est practice, and shall be based on studenta chievementd ata and in alignmentw ith the ADE Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopmenta nd current Arkansas code. Teachersa nd administrators hall be involvedi n the design,i mplementationa, nd evaluationo f the plan for their own professional development. The results of the evaluation made by the participants in each A program shall be used to continuously improve the district's professional development offerings and to W revise the schooli mprovemenpt lan. PD FLEX Flexible professional development hours (flex hours) are those hours which an employee is allowed to substitute professional development activities, different than those offered by the district, but which still meet criteria of either the employee's Individual Improvement Plan or the school's ACSIP, or both. The districts hall determineo n an annualb asis how many,i f any, flex hours of professionald evelopmenti t will allow to be substitutedf or districts cheduledp rofessionald evelopmento fferings.T he determinationm ay be made at an individualb uilding,a grade,o r by subjectb asis. Employeesm ust receivea dvancea pproval from the building principal or district designee for activities they wish to have qualified for flex professionald evelopmenth ours. To the fulleste xtent possible,p rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitiesa re to be scheduled and attended such that teachers do not miss their regular teaching assignments. Six (6) approvedf lex hours creditedt owardf ulfillingt he sixty (60) hour requirements hall equal one contractd ay. Hours of professionald evelopmente arnedb y an employeei n excess of sixty (6 0) or not pre-approvedb y the building principal shall not be credited toward fulfilling the required number of contract days for that employee. Hours earned that count toward the required sixty (60) also count toward the required number of contract days for that employee. C-14 CURRENT BOARD POLICY POMA.KEUP Teachers and administrators who, for any reason, miss part or all of any scheduled professional development activity they were required to attend, must make up the required hours in comparable activities which are to be pre-approved by the building principal or district designee. PD CREDIT To receive credit for his/her professional development activity each employee is responsible for obtaining and submitting documents of attendance for each professional development activity he/she attends. Documentation is to be submitted to the building principal or district designee. REQUIRED PD SESSIONS Teachers and administrators are required to obtain sixty (60) hours of approved professional development annually over a five-year period as part oflicensure renewal requirements. At least six (6) of the sixty (60) annual hours shall be in the area of educational technology. Teachers are required to receive at least two hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies. Teachers who provide instruction in Arkansas history shall receive at least two (2) hours of professional development in Arkansas history as part of the sixty ( 60) hours required annually. Teachers are to obtain professional development in classroom management and health and physical activity annually. Administrators are required to receive at least three hours annually of their sixty (60) required hours of professional development designed to enhance their understanding of effective parental involvement strategies and the importance of administrative leadership in setting expectations and creating a climate conducive to parental participation. Each administrator's professional development is required to also include training in data disaggregation, instructional leadership, and fiscal management ADDIDONAL PD OPPORTUNITIES Each hour of approved training received by certified personnel related to teaching an advance placement class for a subject covered by the College Board or Educational Testing Service, shall receive up to thirty (30) hours of credit which may be applied toward the sixty (60) hours of professional-development required annually. Certified personnel may be entitled to up to twelve (12) hours of professional development for time spent planning and preparing curriculum or developing other instructional materials in their instructional classroom, office or media center prior to the first day of student/teacher interaction provided the time is spent in accordance with the state law and current ADE rules that deal with professional development. C-15 CURRENT BOARD POLICY Certifiedp ersonnela re eligiblet o receivef ifteen( 15) professionald evelopmenth ours for a collegec ourse that meets the criteria identified in law and the applicable ADE rules. Upon ADE approval, the district - shall detennine if the hours earned apply toward the required sixty (60). A maxirrnnn of thirty (30) hours may be appliedt owardt he sixty( 6 0) hourso f professionald evelopmentr equireda nnually. PD DOCUMENTATION Employeesw ho do not receiveo r furnishd ocmnentationo f the requireda nnualp rofessionald evelopment jeopardize the accreditation of their school and academic achievement of their students. Failure of an employeet o receive sixty (60) hours of professionald evelopmenti n any given year may be groundsf or disciplinarya ctionu p to and includingt ermination. ' APPROVED PD ACTMTIES AND AREAS Approvedp rofessionald evelopmenta ctivitiesm ay include conferences,w orkshops,i nstitutes,i ndividual learning, mentoring, peer coaching, study groups, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification, distance learning, internships, district/school programs, and approved college/university coursew ork. Professionald evelopmenta ctivitiess houldb e consistentw ith the objectivesd evelopedb y the NationalS taffD evelopmentC ouncilS tandards. Professional development activities shall relate to the following areas: content (K-12)\ninstructional strategies\nassessment\nadvocacy/leadership\ns ystemic change process\nstandards, frameworks, and curriculmn alignment\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\neducational technology\nprinciples of learning/developmentaslt ages\nc ognitiver esearch\na nd buildinga collaborativele arningc ommunity. Notes: 1 The Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopment4 .02 requiret he districtt o choose the option it A will follow and \"docmnent''i ts choice.T he docmnentationm ay be noted by the selectionc hosen  for this policy and also in the district's\" plan\" for professionald evelopmentr equiredb y A.CA  6-l 7-704(c)(l ). Cross-Reference: Legal References: Policy3 .6---CERTIFIEDP ERSONNELE MPLOYEET RAINING Arkansas State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 15.04 ADE Rules GoverningP rofessionalD evelopment A.CA 6-15-404(f)(2) A.CA. 6-17-703 A.CA. 6-17-704 A.CA. 6-17-705 A.CA. 6-15-1004(c) A.CA. 6-15-1703 A.CA. 6-20-2303(14) Date Adopted: June 26, 1986 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-16 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY . ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 5.15--GRADING Parents or guardians shall be kept informed concerning the progress of their student Parent-teacher conferences are encouraged and may be requested by parents, guardians, or teachers. If the progress of a student is unsatisfactory in a subject, the teacher shall attempt to schedule a parent-teacher conference. In the conference, the teacher shall explain the reasons for difficulties and shall develop, cooperatively with the parents, a plan for remediation which may enhance the probability of the student succeeding. The school shall also send timely progress reports midway of each quarter and issue grades for each nine-week grading period to keep parents/guardians informed of their student's progress. The evaluation of each student's performance on a regular basis serves to give the parents/guardians, students, and the school necessary information to help effect academic improvement Students' grades shall reflect only the extent to which a student has achieved the expressed educational objectives of the course. Students in grades Kl-6 will be graded each nine weeks. Students in grades 7-8 will receive four nine weeks grades and two semester averages. Students in grades 9-12 will receive four quarterly grades, semester exam grades, and two semester averages. For students in grades 9-12, the two quarterly grades shall equal 80% of the semester average, and the semester test shall equal 20% of the semester average. Semester test must be taken before credit in a course is awarded. The grading scale for all schools in the district shall be as follows. A=l00-90 B=89-80 C=79-70 D=69-60 F = 59 and below For the purpose of determining grade point averages, the numeric value of each letter grade shall be A=4points B= 3 points C=2 points D= 1 point F=0 points Grade point average is computed for each student at the secondary level based on all letter grades the student has received for each semester's work using the above four point scale carried to two decimal places. A semester grade point average is computed on the grades from the two nine weeks' grading periods and the semester test grade. C-17 PROPOSED REVISED BOARD POLICY ADDITIONS UNDERLINEDDELETIONS STRIKETHROUGHS 1-18-07 The grade point values for AP and approved honor courses shall be one point greater than for regular courses with the exception that an F shall still be worth O points. A checklistw ill be used in kindergartena t the end of each nine weeks. An I (introducing)D, (develwing), P (proficient),o r N (needs improvement}w ill be given'i n kindergarteni n the areas of reading, writing, socials kills/workh abits,s ocials tudies,s cience/healthm. ath. art, physicale ducation,a nd music. An S (satisfactory) or N (needs improvement) is given in grades 1-5 for handwriting, art, music, and physical education. Legal References: Date Adopted: Last Revised: AC.A. 6-15-902 StateB oard of Education:S tandardso f Accreditation1 2.02 Arkansas Department of Education Rules and Regulations Governing Uniform Grading Scales for Public Secondary Schools February 27, 1996 November 16, 2006 C-18 CURRENT BOARD POLICY 5.15-GRADING Parents or guardians shall be kept informed concerning the progress of their student Parent-teacher conferences are encouraged and may be requested by parents, guardians, or teachers. If the progress of a student is unsatisfactoryin a subject,t he teachers hall attemptt o schedulea parent-teacherc onference.I n the conference,t he teachers hall explaint he reasons for difficultiesa nd shall develop,c ooperativelyw ith the parents, a plan for remediation which may enhance the probability of the student succeeding. The school shall also send timely progress reports midway of each quarter and issue grades for each nine-week gradingp eriodt o keep parents/guardianisn formedo f their student'sp rogress. The evaluation of each student's performance on a regular basis serves to give the parents/guardians, students, and the school necessary information to help effect academic improvement. Students' grades shall reflect only the extent to which a student has achieved the expressed educational objectives of the course. Students in grades K-6 will be graded each nine weeks. Students in grades 7-8 will receive four nine weeks grades and two semester averages. Students in grades 9-12 will receive four quarterly grades, semester exam grades, and two semester averages. For students in grades 9-12, the two quarterly grades shall equal 80% of the semester average, and the semester test shall equal 20% of the semester average. Semester test must be taken before credit in a course is awarded. The grading scale for all schools in the district shall be as follows. A=l00-90 B= 89-80 C=79-70 D= 69-60 F = 59 and below For the purposeo f determiningg radep ointa verages,t he numericv alueo f each letterg rade shall be A=4points B = 3 points C=2 points D= 1 point F= 0 points Grade point average is computed for each student at the secondary level based on all letter grades the student has received for each semester's work using the above four point scale carried to two decimal places. A semester-grade point average is computed on the grades from the two nine weeks' grading periods and the semester test grade. C-19 CURRENT BOARD POLICY The grade point values for AP and approved honor courses shall be one point greater than for regular A courses with the exception that an F shall still be worth O points. W Legal References: A.CA. 6-15-902 State Board of Education: Standards of Accreditation 12.02 Arkansas Department of Education Rules and Regulations Governing Unifonn Grading Scales for Public Secondary Schools Date Adopted: February27, 1996 Last Revised: November 16, 2006 C-20 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TO: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent of Schools FROM: Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education SUBJECT: Recommendation ofK-5 Science/Health Adoption Date: January 11, 2007 The K-5 Elementary Science Adoption Committee recommends the following for Science and Health for the beginning of the 2007-08 school year: Grades K-5 K-5 Title and/or Series Science - See learning in a whole new light Kids For Health Publisher Scott Foresman Kids For Health The committee's recommendation of the above materials was based on the following criteria:  Framework alignment  Direct, guided and full inquiries  Efficient lab set ups  Variety of writing prompts  ESL components at the end of each lesson for all learners  Literacy and math integrated with science  Comprehensive assessments. D-1 -TO: FROM: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT KEN KIRSPEL, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS RHONDA DICKEY, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION SUBJECT: SECONDARY SCIENCE/HEAL TH TEXTBOOK ADOPTION COMMITTEE DATE: JANUARY 11, 2007 ' Recommendation for the Secondary Science/Health Adoption Committee 2006-2007 Name Subject School Joyce Lofton Physical Science East Cynthia Kirby Biology (Chair) East Karen White Parent East David Wallace Health (Chair) East Rebecca Priester Chemistry West Steve Boutwell Zoology West AbbraBest Anatomy \u0026amp; Physiology West Glen Amis Physics (Chair) West Gwen Wiggins Principles of Technology West Janet Garrison Special Education West Stacy Cochran Biology/Environ. Science Argenta John Talley Physical Science Argenta Cathy Alexander Science Poplar Street MaryBalest Health Poplar Street Sharla Smith Parent Poplar Street Amber Gereaux Science (Chair) Lakewood Cassandra Peck Science (Chair) Ridgeroad Brock Moore Health Ridgeroad Jennifer Conner Science (Chair) Rose City Rellia Dillinger Special Education Administration Paulette Blevins Instr. Science Specialist Administration Rhonda Dickey Admin. Dir. of Sec. Ed. Administration Angela Olsen Assistant Superintendent Administration Curriculum \u0026amp; Instruction E-1 Class North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street P.O. Box 687  North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115-0687 501.771.8000  www.nlrsd.k12.ar.us MEMO TO: Ken Kirspel, Superintendent FROM: Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services SUBJECT: Crestwood Elementary Bid Recommendation DATE: January 10, 2007 Attached is the bid tabulation. The lowest responsive bid has yet to be determined. A recommendation will be made at the Board Meeting on January 18, 2007. Below is a budget summary of the Construction Funds based on the Flynco bid which is the most expensive recommendat,ion expected. Construction funds Available June 27, 2006 Transitional Projects District Share (Roofing) Crestwood Addition Bid $2,862,000.00 Fees $ 243,270.00 District $ 60,000.00 State Facilities Contribution Lakewood Middle Addition Estimated State Facilities Contribution Balance $7,415,000.00 - $3,149,503.54 - $3,165,270.00 + $ 792,084.00 - $2,157,565.00 + 597,730.00 $ 332,475.46 \"World Class Schools for World Class Students\" An Equal Opportunity Employer F-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BID SUMMARY MEDIA CENTER AND CLASSROOM ADDITION CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bell Construction Flynco, Inc. G.A.G. Builders Hydco, Inc. J and D Construction CBM Construction CWR Construction DAYCO F-2 $2,950,484.00 $2,862,000.00 $2,940,000.00 $3,139,960.00 $3,067,000.00 $2,863,000.00 $2,898,000.00 $2,447,000.00 I North Llttle Rock School District Local Revenue Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue Revenue From Intermediate Source !Severance Tax Revenue from State Sources-Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding 0th Unrestr Grants-in-Aid Revenue from State Sources-Restricted ReQular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Misc State .. tal Revenu e State TOTAL REVE Building Fun Capital Outla Food Service Federal TOTAL REVE NUE OPERATIONS d y s NUE DECEMBER2 006 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual YT-OActual $12,510,000.00 $7,203,785.40 $10,977,197.18 $6,250,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,471,000.00 $230,692.00 $978,717.05 $310,000.00 .. $0.00 $0.00 $185,000.00 $17,489.63 $104,262.72 $62,000.00 $13,059.98 $27,928.84 $105,000.00 $3,063.53 $22,700.67 $900,000.00 $91,471.76 $551,332.82 $79,000.00 $0.00 $22,767.51 $84,460.00 $8,044.55 $93,506.11 $21,956,460.00 $7,567,606.85 $12,778,412.90 $10,100.00! $0.00! $4,806.57! $35,477,276.00 $3,225,207.00 $16,126,034.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,100.00 $534,639.00 $0.00 $458,020.51 $4,903,623.00 $236,247.00 $1,372,686.00 $2,213,250.00 $0.00 $1,146,732.49 $6,980,000.00 $0.00 $2,315,724.81 $381,715.00 $13,323.80 $202,530.80 $52,500.00 $9,785.00 $55,991.22 $50,545,003.00 $3,484,562.80 $21,679,819.83 $72,511,563.00 $11,052,169.65 $34,463,039.30 $233,000.00 $28,548.49 $204,045.31 $1,550,000.00 $567,414.13 $912,499.24 $3,669,000.00 $323,813.38 $1,479,361.09 $7,181,864.00 $342,804.85 $1,305,334.53 $85,145,427.00 $12,314,750.50 $38,364,279.47 0-1 %YTD Budget Balance Actual/Bud $1,532,802.82 87.75% $6,250,000.00 0.00% $492,282.95 66.53% $310,000.00 0.00% $80,737.28 56.36% $34,071.16 45.05% $82,299.33 21.62% $348,667.18 61.26% $56,232.49 28.82% -$9,046.11 110.71% $9,178,047.10 58.20% $5,293.43! 47.59%! $19,351,242.00 45.45% $0.00 -$100.00 105.00% $76,618.49 85.67% $3,530,937.00 27.99% $1,066,517.51 51.81% $4,664,275.19 33.18% $179,184.20 53.06% -$3,491.22 106.65% $28,865, 183.17 42.89% $38,048,523.70 47.53% $28,954.69 87.57o/e $637,500.76 58.87% $2,189,638.91 40.32/o $5,876,529.47 18.18% $46,781,147.53 45.06% Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOTAL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof fr ech Services Purchased Prooerty Services Other Purchased Services Supplies and Materials Property Other Objects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND BUILDING FUND FEDERAL FUND FOOD SERVICE FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES North Llttle Rock School District DECEMBER20 06 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $37,526,650.00 . $3,716,755.25 $14,886,428.60 $9,846,135.00 768,346.10 $3,104,411.61 $9,779,440.00 $1,279,505.59 $4,987,489.90 $3,975,887.00 $340,739.86 $1,455,859.42 $61,128,112.00 $6,105,346.80 $24,434,189.53 $1,421,058.00 $52,222.82 $337,383.35 $980,780.60 $49,526.94 $405,069.49 $2,600,000.00 $708,134.66 $1,292,845.13 $4,250,000.00 $314,932.33 $2,150,607.01 $2,208,614.00 $5,175.06 $2,024,320.23 $700,000.00 $5,940.50 $736,524.47 $1,110,370.00 $0.00 $218.32 $13,270,822.60 $1,135,932.31 $6,946,968.00 $74,398,934.60 $7,241,279.11 $31,381,157.53 $1,791,824.00 $46,143.31 $694,557.23 $5,530,900.00 $519,880.63 $3,257,190.87 $7,751,725.93 $694,503.65 $2,496,056.37 $3,212,423.00 $413,974.20 $1,685,165.76 $92,685,807.53 $8,915,780.90 $39,514,127.76 0-2 %Yid Budget Balance ActuaL'Bud $22,640,221.40 39.67% $6,741,723.39 50.65% $4,791,950.10 14.89% $2,520,027.58 36.62% $36,693,922.47 39.97o/, $1,083,674.65 23.74% $575,711.11 41.30% $1,307,154.87 49.72% $2,099,392.99 50.60% $184,293.77 91.66% -$36,524.47 105.22% $1,110,151.68 0.02% $6,323,854.60 52.35% $43,017,777.07 42.18% $1,097,266.77 38.76o/, $2,273,709.13 58.89% $5,255,669.56 32.20% $1,527,257.24 52.46% $53,171,679.77 42.63% Function Category 11 XX ReQular ProQrams-Elem/Sec 12XX Special Education 13XX Workforce Education 15XX Compensatory Education 19XX Other Instructional 21XX Suooort Services-Students 22XX Suport Services-Instruction 23XX Suooort Services-Administration 24XX Suooort Services-Sch Admin 25XX Suooort Services-Business 26XX M \u0026amp; 0 Plant Services 27XX Pupil Transportation 28XX Suooort Services-Central 29XX Other Suooort Services 31XX Food Services 33XX Community Service Operations 34XX Other Non-Instr Services 43XX Site Improvement Services 5XX Ed Spec Dev Services 6XX BldQ Aca/Constr Services 47XX Building Improvements 51XX LEA Indebtedness 53XX Payment to other LEA 55XX Indirect CosUAdmin Chan:1es GRAND TOTAL North Llttle Rock School District FUNCTION  DECEMBER 2006 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $28,584,257.10 $2,563,843.17 $10,914,309.88 $9,561,331.69 $857,901.90 $3,189,824.47 $1,564,621.37 $162,959.27 $631,053.94 $4,340,644.20 $456,909.70 $1,301,857.80 $3,826,038.74 $357,150.51 $1,492,520.78 $6,055,139.19 $601,474.29 $2,499,096.44 $5,365,715.06 $449,204.37 $2,097,916.42 $1,210,728.13 $91,052.28 $443, 151.96 $4,039,640.57 $408,056.34 $1,914,914.70 $1,428,158.93 $100,494.49 $679,211.48 $6,524,519.03 $607,995.53 $3,141,368.45 $3,547,667.77 $453,732.71 $1,891,532.52 $945,077.33 $96,461.10 $519,437.85 $436,103.89 $65,034.79 $211,163.17 $3,997,597.66 $488,053.62 $1,955,129.38 $47,274.41 $2,576.81 $11,729.56 $123,406.25 $13,259.34 $63,388.26 $938,867.80 $0.00 $490,381.42 $470.21 $0.00 $0.00 $12,225.33 $9,405.41 $9,405.41 $6,402,208.35 $525,609.64 $4,779,077.85 $1,923,825.10 $1,345.25 $674,395.64 $1,692,738.14 $603,260.38 $603,260.38 $117,551.26 $0.00 $0.00 $92,685,807.53 $8,915,780.90 $39,514,127.76 0-3 % Ytd Budget Balance ActuaUBud $17,669,947.22 38.18% $6,371,507.22 33.36% $933,567.43 40.33% $3,038,786.40 29.99% $2,333,517.96 39.01% $3,556,042.75 41.27% $3,267,798.64 39.10% $767,576.17 36.60% $2,124,725.87 47.40% $748,947.45 47.56% $3,383, 150.58 48.15% $1,656,135.25 53.32% $425,639.48 54.96% $224,940.72 48.42% $2,042,468.28 48.91% $35,544.85 24.81% $60,017.99 51.37% $448,486.38 52.23% $470.21 0.00% $2,819.92 76.93% $1,623,130.50 74.65% $1,249,429.46 35.05% $1,089,477.76 35.64% $117,551.26 0.00% $53,171,679.77 42.63% North Uttle Rock school District SOURCEO F FUNDS DECEMBER2 006 Current Month %Ytd Source of Funds Category Budget Actual Y-T -0 Actual Budget Balance Actual/Bud 000 Non-cateaorical $67,861,196.61 $6,935,038.27 $28,764,946.93 $39,096,249.68 42.39% 213 Intensive School Improvement $1,128.49 $609.90 $609.90 $518.59 54.05% 223 Prof Development Act 59 $419,005.01 $9,434.87 $114,102.56 $304,902.45 27.23% 225 Technoloov Grant $1,626.91 $0.00 $0.00 $1,626.91 0.00% 227 CPEP $78,552.45 $0.00 $9,800.54 $68,751.91 12.48% 245 Pathwise Mentoring $85,953.48 $34,886.77 $36,934.87 $49,018.61 42.97% 250 Act 591 Residential $48,901.32 $0.00 $0.00 $48,901.32 0.00% 260 Early Childhood Sp Ed $982,979.62 $82,925.51 $360,125.71 $622,853.91 36.64% 271 GIT Advance Placement $4,523.03 $0.00 $0.00 $4,523.03 0.00% 275 Alternative LeaminQ Environment $1,283,801.76 $111,313.32 $450,272.88 $833,528.88 35.07% 276 English Lang Learners $36,309.23 $517.\n21 $12,808.61 $23,500.62 35.28% 281 NSLA $2,303,528.84 $233,368.00 $874,898.15 $1,428,630.69 37.98% 365 ABC Preschool $2,409,866.65 $205,459.72 $763,922.77 $1,645,943.88 31.70% 381 Smart Start Literacy $74,838.77 $7,198.39 $39,840.05 $34,998.72 53.23% 392 General Facility Funding $571,534.22 $74,063.14 $313,045.25 $258,488.97 54.77% 398 OHS Preschool Improvement $940.41 $0.00 $0.00 $940.41 0.00% 401 Academic Fae lmmed Repair $2,111,549.76 $2,687.94 $1,995,775.57 $115,774.19 94.52% 403 Academic Fae Transitional Pgm $4,878,659.39 $516,880.63 $3,150,489.84 $1,728,169.55 64.58% 404 Academic Fae Partnership Pgm $322,654.70 $3,000.00 $106,701.03 $215,953.67 33.07% 406 lmprv Lit Thru Libraries $4,123.22 $0.00 $4,358.47 -$235.25 105.71% 430 ROTC $119,009.84 $11,970.02 $54,437.77 $64,572.07 45.74% 441 Title IV-B 21st Century $193,747.24 $12,309.11 $68,387.66 $125,359.58 35.30% 467 Hurricane Relief-Homeless $0.00 $0.00 $40.22 -$40.22 501 Title 1-Reo Comp Ed $4,106,564.85 $378,750.97 $1,077,697.90 $3,028,866.95 26.24% 520 Title V-A Innovative Program $9,404.10 $0.00 $0.00 $9,404.10 0.00% 523 Title I Readino First $294,198.13 $16,686.65 $104,635.19 $189,562.94 35.57% 530 Homeless-Stewart McKinney $34,795.17 $534.60 $7,798.46 $26,996.71 22.41% 535 Title V-B Charter Schools $47,678.79 $3,852.66 $24,715.80 $22,962.99 51.84% 565 Teacher Quality Enhancement $67,652.16 $6,547.40 $25,314.67 $42,337.49 37.42% 570 Carf Perkins Vocational $202,278.45 $18,010.35 $26,859.39 $175,419.06 13.26% 702 Title VI-B PL 94-142 $1,798,865.29 $132,965.75 $520,855.28 $1,278,010.01 26.95% 710 Sp Ed Preschool Sec 619 $879,728.52 $77,590.03 $357,016.86 $522,711.66 40.56% 750 Medicaid $169,627.41 $7,656.57 $56,711.51 $112,915.90 33.43% 751 Medicaid Sp Ed Preschool $79,934.86 $5,278.84 $20,930.34 $59,004.52 26.18% 754 Javits - GIT Grant $9,404.10 $24.82 $9,526.00 -$121.90 101.30% 756 Title II-A Improve Teaching $889,854.57 $13,982.20 $96,790.65 $793,063.92 10.88% 761 Title Ill Eno Lang Acqui $17,658.08 $130.00 $3,305.00 $14,353.08 18.72% 781 Title IV-A Drug Ed $56,080.41 $5,255.46 $16,037.36 $40,043.05 28.60% 785 Comprehensive Sch Health $14,952.53 $0.00 $11,217.47 $3,735.06 75.02% 796 Workforce Investment Act $25,861.28 $2,958.22 $9,420.37 $16,440.91 36.43% 995 Soft Drink Acct $186,837.85 $3,893.58 $23,796.73 $163,041.12 12.74% GRAND TOTAL $92,685,807.53 $8,915,780.90 $39,514,127.76 $53,171,679.77 42.63/4 0-4 $80,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 .$50,000,000.00 $40,000,000:00 $30,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $0.00  Budget El Expenses NLRSD Actual to Budget Comparison As of December, 2006 Operating Building Capital Outlay Federal Food Service $74,398,934.60 $5,530,900.00 $1,791,824.00 $7,751,725.93 $3,212,423.00 $31,381,157.53 $3,257,190.87 $694,557.23 $2,496,056.37 $1,685,165.76 Funds 0-5  Budget Ill Expenses Corinne Burkhardt Kelli Hogue Carolyn Rasner Griffin, Kyle Smedley, Telicia NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Board Agenda - January 18, 2007 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS NLRHS- West Campus, Special Education Teacher, Effective 12/20/06 NLRHS -East Campus, Math Teacher, Effective 1/10/07 NLRHS - East Campus, Special Education Teacher, Effective 12/14/06 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL Tri-District Early Childhood Program, Speech Language Pathologist, Effective 12/15/06, Category IV, Step 18, 190 days Boone Park Elementary, Pre-Kindergarten Teacher, Effective 1/16/07, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: Kyle Mark Griffin PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Tri-District Early Childhood Program, Speech Language Pathologist EDUCATION: B.A. - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little. Rock, AR 8/80 LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: M.S. - University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 5/84 Standard Five Year- Speech Language Pathology (#532) 12/31/07 RECOMMENDATION 21 years experience as a teacher / speech pathologist in Arkansas - Thelma Jasper, Tri-District Early Childhood Program Coordinator Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-1 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) NAME: Telicia Lynn Smedley PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Boone Park Elementary, Pre-Kindergarten Teacher EDUCATION: B.A. - University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 12/06 LICENSURE: Initial Three Year, Early Childhood Education, P-4 STUDENT TEACHING: Boone Park Elementary, NLR, AR 10/06-12/06 Indian Hills Elementary. NLR, AR 01/05 - 05/05 RECOMMENDATION: Jody Edrington, Coordinator of Early Childhood Programs Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Belinda Brown Tonja Chestnut Kay Edwards Allegra Friels Cora Hair Sharee Jefferson De Wayne Johnson Shirley Lee Deatra Martin Cenita Mason Trinette McCuien Bobbie Moffett CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS NLRHS West Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 9-01-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-08-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective I 0-31-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective I 0-09-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8/18/06 Poplar Street Middle School - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 11-26-06 Ridgeroad Middle Charter School - Child Nutrition A~sistant Effective 12-12-06 Poplar Street Middle School - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 9-24-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8-18-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-20-06 NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8/18/06 NLRHS West Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8/18/06 P-2 Marnell Nelson Felicia Phillips Heather Phillips Contonia Russell Arlisha Smith Bruce Strong Vilesia Tatum Angela Thomas Kandis Thrower Sheila Arnold Jonda Eskridge Melissa Hadley Cenita Mason Sherri Pettit Vicktonya Reeves CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS - CONTINUED NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8-18-06 NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-01-06 Food Services department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 11-1 7-06 Pike View Elementary-Teacher's Aide/Pre-Kindergarten Effective O 1-03-07 Belwood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 8/22/06 North Heights Elementary - Lead Custodian Effective 12-15-06 Lynch Drive Elementary - Lunch Period Aide Effective O 1-03-07 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 10-18-06 Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 10-01-06 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES From NLRHS West Campus-Secretary To NLRHS West Campus-Office Secretary From Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant To NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant From NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant To Ridgeroad Middle Charter School - Child Nutrition Assistant From Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant To NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant From Administration - Adm. Dir. Finance/ Audit/Purchasing, Secretary To Administration - Asst. Supt. of Curriculum/Instruction, Secretary From Food Services Department -Child Nutrition Assistant To NLRHS East Campus - Child Nutrition Assistant P-3 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES - CONTINUED Diane Roberts From Pike View Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant To Food Services Department-Child Nutrition Assistant Billie Stewart Erin Engelkes Renee Lynn Gray Mary Sydney Hess Ronda Jackson Tina King From Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant To Lynch Drive Elementary- Child Nutrition Assistant NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Seventh Street Elementary - Early Morning Aide Effective 12-08-06, Category 260, Step 19, 178 days Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-04-07, Category 901, Step 21, 181 days Poplar Street Middle School - Secretary Effective 12-07-06, Category 230, Step 51,205 days Food Services Department - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 01-04-07, Category 902, Step 23, 181 days Lynch Drive Elementary-Lunch Period Aide Effective 12-14-06, Category 260, Step 19, 178 days Sherrell Layton Food Services Department-Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-20-06, Category 901, Step 18, 181 days Zera Shannen Mays ---- Tri-District Early Childhood - Office Secretary Effective 12-15-06, Category 225, Step 51, 252 days Ella Webster-Mason ---- Food Services Department- Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-11-06, Category 901, Step 18, 181 days Joy Ploszay Amboy Elementary - Early Morning Aide Effective O 1-05-07, Category 266, Step 26, 178 day\\ Mary Watson Transportation Department - Bus Driver Effective 01-03-07, Category 507, Step 51, 190 days P-4 January 8, 2007 To: Barry Kincl Cc: Jerry Massey, Marsha Satterfield, Lee Tackett From: Amanda Coombe, North Little Rock High School Speech and Drama Teachers, and Cast/Crew Party Liasons RE: 2007 Cast and Crew Party for Peter Pan On behalf of the parent volunteers who are organizing the Peter Pan Cast and Crew party on Sunday, March 4, 2007 following the matinee performance, I respectfully request official access and appropriate supervision for decorating the cafeteria at East Campus as well as heat/air for the event. The following dates and times will be necessary: FRIDAY, MARCH 2- after the last lunch shift, from 3:30-6:30pm. We will decorate the ceiling first, so if the cafeteria workers stand the tables up to mop, they can leave them up for decorating. SATURDAY, MARCH 3- From 8:15am-5:30pm SUNDAY, MARCH 4- from 12:30pm until after the party and clean up, approximately 10:00pm. In addition, please DO NOT WAX THE FLOORS FRIDAY AFTERNOON. According to parents this delayed the opening of the cafeteria for parents in times past. We also request the use of rolling scaffolding and two tall ladders on Friday to work on ceilings and other decorations. It would also be helpful if we had a copy of the table set up. We will do our best to put tables back where they belong. It is an honor and a privilege to use this beautiful facility! This event is a large undertaking and we are thankful for your support. We also thank you for time and consideration of this request. Please feel free to call me with any questions or concerns. Amanda Coombe School: 771-8127 Home: 772-6907 S-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO . . 00 0 A T \u0026amp; T 84.00 63030 A-ONE LAMINATION, INC. 150.36 62883 A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES 1,424.64 63170 A'TEST CONSULTANTSIN C 599.00 62908 A'TEST CONSULTANTSIN C 232.00 63416 AAA AUDIO METRICS/MEDICAL 55.00 62719 AAEA 241.32 63191 AASBO 60.00 63251 AASBO 115.00 63517 ABILITATIONS 555.23 62874 ACCESS SCHOOLS 3,125.00 62673 ACE GLASS COMPANY, INC. 536.44 62651 ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC 12,948.68 63492 ADRIAN CHILLIEST 60.00 63369 ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. 1,321.37 63008 AEA 1,213.68 63499 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 2,277.00 62594 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 60.00 62624 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 2,277.00 63185 - AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 60.00 63239 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 2,277.00 63512 AETNA LIFE \u0026amp; CASUALTY 1,622.14 62652 AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED 6,449.09 63139 AIR DISTRIBUTORS CO INC 3,327.54 63583 ALAN CROWNOVER 238.45 62946 ALARMCOIN CORPORATED 2,886.38 63403 ALARMTECS YSTEMS 295. 00 63015 ALEXANDRAPR ITCHETT 43.68 62969 ALICIA YARBROUGH 45.79 63155 ALIGN .00 62584 V ALIGN .00 62598 V ALIGN .00 62615 V ALIGN .00 62625 V ALIGN .00 62648 V ALIGN .00 62934 V ALIGN .00 i2938 V ALIGN .00 3175 V ALIGN .00 63189 V ALIGN .00 63209 V ALIGN .00 63230 V ALIGN .00 63241 V ALIGN .00 63245 V ALIGN .00 63250 V ALIGN .00 63449 V ALIGN .00 63452 V - ALIGN .00 63457 V ALIGN .00 63495 V ALIGN .00 63502 V T- 1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. ALIGN .00 63516 V ALIGN .00 63678 V ALIGN .00 63693 V ALIGN .00 63697 V ALIGN .00 63702 V ALIGN .00 63721 V ALIGN .00 63726 V ALISHA HERRING 146.72 63147 ALL AMERICAN INC. 3,882.27 63253 ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORP 4,300.56 63252 ALLIED PRINTING AND SUPPLY CO. 414.20 62947 ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTING 1,080.00 62882 ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTING 825.00 63119 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 5,383.14 63046 AMANDAST UCKEY 181. 00 63136 AMANDAW ARE 23.17 63624 AMBER DAVIS GEREAUX 56.94 62970 AMERICA DIRECT INC 193.48 63368 AMERICANA SSOC OF TEACHERS 50.00 62917 AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO 2,291.50 62591 AMERICAN FUNDS SERVICE CO 2,506.50 63182 AMERICANF UNDS SERVICE CO 2,431.50 63509 - AMERICANL EGACYP UBLISHING INC 260. 70 62966 AMERICANL IBRARYA SSOCIATION 330.00 62656 AMERICANM AT \u0026amp; SPECIALTY 587.78 63547 AMERICANS PEECH-LANGUAGE- 2,035.00 63102 AMERICANS PEECH-LANGUAGE- 3,945.00 63386 AMERICANS TAMP \u0026amp; MARKING 998.82 63360 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES 11,720.00 62593 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES 400.00 62623 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES 11,720.00 63184 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES 400.00 63238 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES 10,645.00 63511 AMY VOLLMAN 86.58 62859 AMY WOODSMALL 639.60 63351 ANDREA HAIN 32.64  63151 ANDRIA SMITH 51. 91 63131 ANGELA HIBBS 12 .11 63473 ANGELA RAINEY 20.00 62821 ANITA CAMERON 281. 00 62657 ANITA CAMERON 49. 28 62941 ANTHONYC ANTRELL 20.00 62776 ANTHONYC ANTRELL 974.00 63425 ANTHONYC ANTRELL 20.00 63593 ANTHONYC ONNORS 90.00 62829 ANTHONYL WEBB 80.00 63632 AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. 377.55 62658 - AOS LASER SERVICE, INC. 377.55 63520 ARA CONFERENCE 75.00 62926 T- 2 - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE 2,224.82 62689 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE 143.57 62975 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE 3,116.71 63278 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE 127.18 63537 ARES SPORTSWEAR 156.79 62927 ARKANSASA GENCYF OR FEDERAL 720.00 63272 ARKANSASA RT CENTER 45.50 63584 ARKANSASA SSOCIATION OF 180.00 62943 ARKANSASB AG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENTC O 290.25 63672 ARKANSASB USINESS PUBLISHING 1,700.00 63391 ARKANSASB USINESS PUBLISHING 855.00 63591 ARKANSASC OUNCILO F TEACHERS 650.00 62783 ARKANSASD EMOCRAGT AZETTE 416.00 62688 ARKANSASD EPT OF HEALTH 275.00 63379 ARKANSASR EADINGA SSOCIATION 1,010.00 63322 ARKANSASS KATIUM 300.00 63144 ARKANSASS OUNDA ND SERVICE 2,000.00 63422 ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT 354,373.13 62935 ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT 16,846.29 62936 ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT 908.34 62937 - ARKANSAST EACHERR ETIREMENT 1,226.00 63501 ARMATURE XCHANGE 158.05 62990 ARMATURE XCHANGE 63.22 63292 ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANY,I NC. 474.83 62653 ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANY,I NC. 1,412.40 62939 ASCO HARDWARCEO MPANY,I NC. 193.21 63518 ASHLEY ALLEN INGALLS 25.00 62838 ASHLEY HANAN 159.97 63150 ASHLEY WILLIAMS 3.00 63462 ASHLEY-WOODSO\u0026amp;N ASSOC. 4,550.00 62756 ASHLEY-WOODSO\u0026amp;N ASSOC. 6,762.38 63034 ASHLEY-WOODSO\u0026amp;N ASSOC. 2,673.45 63580 ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION \u0026amp; 255.50 63525 BACKGROUNIDN FORMATIONS YSTEMS 200.00 63259 BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES 616.18 63143 BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES 1,073.80 63418 BANK \u0026amp; BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1,080.39 63540 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 468,889.50 62586 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 47,639.30 62617 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 478,997.64 63177 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 54,369.74 63232 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 39,607.10 63243 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 7,427.20 63247 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 19,615.25 63451 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 3,995.03 63454 - BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 479,077.27 63504 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 236.00 63695 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 54.60 63699 BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL 48,129.77 63723 T- 3 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANNER SIGN \u0026amp; BARRICADE INC BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARRY KINCL BARRY KINCL BARRY L FISHER BARRY STURGES BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BECKY WITCHER BENE KEITH BENTON LADY PANTHERS SOFTBALL BEST COMPUTERS UPPLIES BETTY MORELAND BILL DUVALL BILL DUVALL BILL LEFEAR BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BLIND AMBITION INC BLUE BELL CREAMERIES, L.P. BLUE HILL WRECKERS ERVICE BLUE HILL WRECKERS ERVICE BOB BELL \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBIE J RIGGINS BOBBY ACKLIN BOBBY TRAFFANSTEDT BOILER INSPECTION DIVISION BOILER INSPECTION DIVISION T- 4 AMOUNT 1,284,822.52 181,539.74 1,293,179.13 208,924.46 , 196,688.55 39,999.49 101,352.40 20,468.57 1,322,987.40 1,646.90 527.06 191,561.44 322.51 353.98 1,764.70 307.45 10.00 149.41 20.00 90.00 19.79 677.71 258.16 380.32 376.32 100.00 164.00 9.36 100.70 22.58 81. 43 238.99 107.35 47 .. 75 694.06 3,718.69 709.96 114. 45 1,466.05 49.42 60.00 130.51 40.00 20.00 20.00 153.59 29.56 17.00 143.00 CHK. NO. 62585 62616 63176 63231 63242 63246 63450 63453 63503 63694 63698 63722 63114 62670 63266 63526 62660 63260 62846 63630 62667 62952 63524 63053 62676 62822 63402 63460 62954 63458 63111 62708 62992 63552 62655 63634 62841 64955 63267 62807 62810 62869 63067 63356 63609 63047 63040 62956 63268 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT BOONE PARK ELEM ACTIVITY FUND BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BRANDYN ESSELRODT BRAYE VALENTINE BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA WATSON BRENDA WILLOUGHBY BRIAN A BOYD BRIAN NICHOLS BRIAN R GLENN BRICKER PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC BROCK MOORE BROMLEYP ARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE BRYAN HUTSON BRYAN HUTSON BRYAN HUTSON BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC. BUREAU OF EDUCATION \u0026amp; RESEARCH BUREAU OF EDUCATION \u0026amp; RESEARCH BYE-MO'R, INC. BYE-MO'R, INC. BYE-MO'R, INC. C.T.A. CABOT FLORISTS CABOT FLORISTS CALLOWAHYO USE, INC. CANDICE YOUNG CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK CAPITOL SERVICE COMPANY CAREY SMITH CARLE ROY CARLEX CARLTON-BATESC O. CAROL HOLIMAN CAROL MCADAMS CARQUESTO F NL R # 4112 CARSON DELLOSA PUBLISHING CO CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CEDRIC BLACK CENTERPOINT ENERGY CENTERPOINT ENERGY CENTRALL AUNDRYE QUIPMENTI NC CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. CERTIFIED LABORATORIES T- 5 AMOUNT 20. 71 935.68 91. 42 32.00 72.15 3. 72 7.02 80.00 361. 26 70.00 1,875.00 79. 51 55 .15 20.00 20.00 20.00 400.76 185.00 185.00 605. 72 13.57 238.83 10,514.84 40.28 82.74 45.70 142.74 10.00 10.00 10.00 486.55 80.00 90.00 92.75 154.46 858.20 25.00 58.27 8.93 12,476.38 2,404.90 2,795.37 35.92 62. 79 25,435.65 143.07 991. 34 35,118.48 1,090.00 CHK. NO. 62885 62957 62924 63336 63411 63482 63138 63370 62602 62843 63340 63432 62958 62848 63080 63619 63172 62778 63043 62930 63445 63675 63496 62960 63270 62680 63629 62644 63227 63719 62894 63628 63373 62873 62679 62733 63254 62951 63106 62913 63417 63661 63093 63264 63522 63405 63112 63645 62962 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. CHARLENEL OPEZ-MONTAGUE 26.77 63481 CHEMSEARCH 664.56 63038 CHERYL HALL 48.75 63092 CHERYL PENNINGTON 149.76 63016 CHILDCRAFTE DUCATIONC ORP 1,186.12 62963 CHILDRENS LIBRARY RESOURCES 15.66 63158 CINDY QUARRY 11. 62 63494 CINTAS 128.18 62631 CINTAS 38.26 63194 CINTAS 128.18 63214 CINTAS 86.40 63291 CINTAS 128.18 63707 CITY OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK 4,878.75 63077 CLARENCEE MARTIN 25.00 62802 CLARKE XTERMINATINcGo , INC. 218.00 62736 CLARKE XTERMINATINCGO , INC. 817.50 63020 CLARKE XTERMINATINcGo , INC. 54.50 63314 CLARKE XTERMINATINcGo , INC. 54.50 63568 CLASSROOMD IRECT 328.93 62898 CLASSROOMD IRECT 2,449.69 63132 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 177. 61 62884 CLEARM OUNTAIN 43.24 63392 - COBB AND SUSKIE LTD. 14,081.25 63352 COCA-COLAE NTERPRISES 4,417.92 62858 COCA-COLAU SA 443.25 63289 CODEMICRO 612.45 63616 COMCABLES 1,362.03 62692 COMCABLES 100.75 63280 COMCASTC ABLEVISION 100.00 62949 COMMUNICATIOPNL US+ 108.80 63635 COMMUNITPYR ODUCTSL LC 495.00 63149 CONNEYS AFETY PRODUCTS 69.39 63528 CONNIE FOX 6.74 63461 CONSECOL IFE INSURANCE 173.98 63487 CONSOLIDATEDEL ECTRICALD ISTRI 1,044.86 63545 CORNELIUS BURTON 50.00 62824 CORPORATE XPRESS 1,974.44 62866. CORPORATE XPRESS 3,729.42 63099 CORPORATE XPRESS 8,843.13 63381 CORPORATE XPRESS 525.35 63639 COURTNEYPH AUP 1,509.41 63424 COUSINS VIDEO 74.55 63161 COUSINS VIDEO 825.75 63669 CPI 1,199.00 63543 CREWS MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,368.00 63573 CROWB URLINGAMCEO 31. 37 63382 CROWB URLINGAMCEO 13.06 63640 CROW-BURLINGAMCOE . 7.76 62967 CRYSTAL EVANS 93.21 63110. T- 6 - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. CRYSTAL PRODUCTIONS 55.00 63276 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 158.99 62601 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 127.02 62636 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 91.14 63195 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 129.33 63219 CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC 127.30 63711 CURRICULUMA SSOCIATES INC 2,268.00 62968 CWI, PLC 1,500.00 62998 CYNTHIA WOODS 8.70 63483 DAMARIS PURTLE 29.28 63051 DANA BIBLES 6.10 63468 DANA MCCOY 59.24 62925 DANIEL J FLOYD 25.00 62850 DANIEL J FLOYD 25.00 63082 DANIEL J FLOYD 25.00 63621 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 62628 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 63212 DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN 20.00 63705 DARLA EARLES 183.62 63000 DARRAGHC OMPANY 72.86 63532 - DATAMAOXF ARKANSAS 220.80 62650 DATEK, INC. 421. 7 4 63169 DAVID D. COOP 209.55 62626 DAVID D. COOP 3,350.00 63190 DAVID D. COOP 209.55 63210 DAVID D. COOP 209.55 63703 DAVID W EDWARDS 179.57 62600 DAVID W EDWARDS 179.57 63193 DAVID W EDWARDS 179.87 63680 DAVID W WYMER 70.00 63073 DAVID WALLACE 27.30 62895 DAVID WHITE 50.00 62788 DAWNEC ARROLL 52.22 63126 DEANN ROACH 22.50 63154 DEBBIE DAVENPORT - 13.34 63163 DEBBIE ROZZELL 14.16 62751 DEBBIE ROZZELL 17.35 63575 DEBORAHC OKER 10.54 62909 DEBORAHL UTZ 589.60 63269 DELI PARTNER'S 212.80 63595 DELTA DENTAL 56,930.16 63486 DELTA EDUCATION 143.00 63303 DEMCO 271. 68 62684 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINISTRAT 280,862.04 63727 DERRICK GREENWOOD 60.00 63359 DEVELOPMENTATLH ERAPIES 393.75 63536 DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX 3,548.00 63730 DIAMONDIN TERNATIONALT RUCKS 1,917.63 62742 DIAMONDIN TERNATIONALT RUCKS 164.64 63024 T- 7 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT DIAMONDIN TERNATIONALT RUCKS DIAMONDIN TERNATIONALT RUCKS DIANE R SMITH DIEDRA GASKALLA DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT TROPHIES, INC. DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DORIE SUMMONS DOROTHYF ARRIS DR ANGELA OLSEN DR ANGELA OLSEN DR ANGELA OLSEN DSANJA T BOYLAND DUSTY VANNATTER DUSTY VANNATTER DUSTY VANNATTER DWIGHT L RENDELL EAST CAMPUSA CTIVITY FUND EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS ECOLAB, INC. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDUCATIONT ECHNOLOGSYE RVICES EDUCATORSB OOKD EPOSITORYO F EDUCATORSB OOKD EPOSITORYO F EDUCATORSO UTLET ELECTRONIC VIDEO SYSTEMS ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY ELGIN SCHOOL SUPPLY EMPLOYEEB ENEFITS DIVISION ENERGY EDUCATION INC ENTERGY SYSTEMS ENTERGY SYSTEMS ENTERGY SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAPLR OTECTIONA SSOC ENVIRONMENTATLE CHNOLOGIES,I N EQUIPMENT CONCEPTS \u0026amp; DESIGNS ERIC ARMIN INC. ERIC D BROWN ERIC WALDORF ERIC WALDORF ETA/CUISENAIRE ETA/CUISENAIRE T- 8 AMOUNT 2,576.90 294.08 398.59 110.33 26. 92 91.38 154.73 94.80 158.01 232.39 83.89 330.42 38.26 38.38 75.00 160.00 160.00 150.00 60.00 262.40 150.00 300.00 1,404.47 37.58 30.65 919.08 478.26 510.00 535.41 7,948.01 54.99 81. 75 290.37 684.33 84.78 409,432.76 10,100.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 370,449.90 250.00 6,856.21 1,661.09 90.00 35.10 23.40 796.07 3,000.55 CHK. NO. 63318 63570 62630 63118 63104 62972 62637 63220 63712 62876 63409 62767 63039 63589 63087 63049 63342 63594 63042 63393 63124 63653 63533 62685 62973 63275 63534 63354 62686 62974 63658 62959 62842 63078 63618 63491 63255 62642 63225 63717 63130 63443 62893 63257 63071 62942 63256 62690 62977 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT ETA/CUISENAIRE ETA/CUISENAIRE EV MASTER FABER AND BRAND LLC FABER AND BRAND LLC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARRELL-CALHOUPNA INT CO FCCLA LOCKBOXO PERATION FERRELLGAS FIRE MOUNTAIN FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLINN SCIENTIFIC COMPANY FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FRANKLIN IND FRED H HOKES FRED H HOKES FREE SPIRIT PUBLISHING FREY SCIENTIFIC CO. GARY STEPHENS GARY STEPHENS GARY STEPHENS GARY STEPHENS GARY YIELDING GATEWAYC OMPANIESI NC GENOA LLC GEORGE TAYLOR GLADYS MCDONALD GLASS DOCTOR GLORIA SMITH GOODMADNI STRIBUTION INC GRADY W JONES CO INC GRAINGER GRAINGER GREEK 4 LIFE GRETCHENL AUIPPA HAND IN HAND DAY CARE HAROLD D STARK HARPER SHEET METAL WORKS INC. HASLER INC HELPING HAND CHILDRENS HERAL ENTERPRISES, INC. HIGHSMITH INC HOBBY LOBBY HOLIDAY INN SELECT EXPRESS HOLLY POWELL T- 9 AMOUNT 904.97 390.17 13,989.00 99.95 86.96 381. 21 381. 21 132.21 168.00 23.50 200.50 653.09 6,775.16 626. 64 276.36 2,823.41 5,112.93 76.00 70.00 70.00 58.70 194.80 100.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 30.00 2,988.74 4,424.26 23.87 12.72 139.75 57.84 34.23 316.10 4,543.03 347.73 194.57 130.00 1,500.00 69.42 258.62 588.60 797. 50 30.91 405.29 131.77 541. 92 260.36 CHK. NO. 63279 63539 63599 62634 63217 63198 63683 63281 63433 63585 62994 62694 62979 63541 63265 62693 62978 63701 62789 63052 62691 63542 62877 63113 63390 63646 63263 63088 63084 62984 63062 63057 63441 63548 62872 62766 63334 63355 63420 62965 63439 62986 63410 62901 63285 63550 63549 63436 63479 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT HOME DEPOT/GECF HONEYBAKEHDA MC OMPANY HONEYBAKEHDA MC OMPANY HORIZONS OFTWAREIN TERNATIONAL HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHANP LLC HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHANP LLC HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHANP LLC HOUGHTOMN IFFLIN COMPANY HOUGHTOMN IFFLIN COMPANY HOWARDR OSS HOWARDR OSS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HOM'S HARDWAR\u0026amp;E RENTAL HOM'S HARDWAR\u0026amp;E RENTAL HOM'S HARDWAR\u0026amp;E RENTAL IDEAL BREAD ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT IN DYER NEED ENTERPRISES INDEPENDENTM USIC SERVICE, INC INDIAN HILLS ELEM ACTIVITY INFORMATIONV AULTINGS ERVICES ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IPARADIGMS, LLC. ISSAC HENRY J \u0026amp; B MUSIC SALES, INC. J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY J L HEIN SERVICE INC J L HEIN SERVICE INC JS PRINTING JACK T CARTER COMPANY JACQUELINE SUMLER T-10 AMOUNT 132.45 453.77 534.91 47.25 502.69 502.69 502.69 47.20 2,244.27 60.00 60.00 7,737.82 35.69 507.38 7.74 920.11 7.45 161.20 425.00 425.00 425.00 128.55 1,409.20 158.24 151. 90 2,981.02 547.50 2,981.02 547.50 2,981.02 1,074.00 34,518.02 17,760.23 12,700.96 50.00 136.00 50.00 136.00 50.00 136.00 640.00 70.00 97.40 118. 80 21,996.00 27,445.00 320.00 146.00 39.98 CHK. NO. 63341 62903 63412 62761 62610 63205 63689 62702 62987 63005 63304 62915 63142 63664 62703 63287 63551 62704 62608 63202 63687 62663 63089 62887 62982 62592 62622 63183 63237 63510 63006 62891 63128 63400 62603 62607 63196 63201 63681 63686 63271 62812 63335 63094 63423 63665 62777 62989 63164 . - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. JACQUES MUMFORD 50.00 62793 JALEN KING 50.00 62827 JAMES W. WOODARDJ,R 126.13 63165 JAMIE EUBANKS 1,190.00 63141 JAMIE EUBANKS 2,310.00 63663 JAN KUCALA 16.77 63065 JANET E. THOMASP .T. 653.34 63041 JANET FOSTER 187.50 63090 JARIUS L. COPELAND 25.00 63625 JEFFERY TURNER 90.00 62771 JEFFREY SAND COMPANY 39.88 62707 JENNIFER FRANCE 678.79 62701 JENNIFER SKINNER 4.76 63469 JERRY MASSEY 483.96 63091 JERRY MASSEY 420.00 63636 JESSICA MOSER 155.94 62798 JILL MILLS 31.20 63288 JIMMY MAXWELL 29.42 63600 JO-ANN GOLDMANT, RUSTEE 281. 37 62633 JO-ANN GOLDMANT, RUSTEE 281.37 63216 - JO-ANN GOLDMANT, RUSTEE 281.37 63709 JOHN DAVID HENRY 25.00 62819 JOHN SCHWULST 30.00 62664 JOHN SCHWULST 60.00 62944 JOHN SCHWULST 42.50 63262 JOHN W RICE 25.00 62816 JOHNNIE F HENRY 25.00 62801 JOHNSTONES UPPLY 42.40 62868 JOSH E MCHUGHEAS TTORNEY 50.35 62611 JOSH E MCHUGHEAS TTORNEY 50.35 63206 JOSH E MCHUGHEAS TTORNEY 50.35 63690 JOYCE BRADLEYB ABIN 430.53 62643 JOYCE BRADLEYB ABIN 6,239.04 63204 JOYCE BRADLEYB ABIN 430.53 63226 JOYCE BRADLEYB ABIN 430.53 - 63718 JOYCE J NICHOLS 45.00 62815 JOYCE J NICHOLS 20.00 63069 JOYCE J NICHOLS 20.00 63611 JOYE WILLIAMS 31. 90 63475 JUAN RIDGEWAY 50.00 62782 JUDITH QUATTLEBAUM 56.09 63168 JUDITH QUATTLEBAUM 51.09 63673 JULIE SOBKOVIAK 180.00 63313 JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT 500.00 62825 JUST FOR KIDS 450.00 63427 KANSASP AYMENTC ENTER 46.15 62632 - KANSASP AYMENTC ENTER 46.15 63215 KANSASP AYMENTC ENTER 46.15 63708 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING co 868. 79 62709 T-11 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING co 1,222.28 63553 KAREN POWELL 74.61 63108 KATHLEANK ING 30.00 63364 KATHRYNH ALE 223.36 63666 KATHY HELLER 20.00 63478 KATYG EARHARTH UNT 34.87 62666 KAY EWART 113.26 62945 KAYE COLEMAN 33.68 62795 KAYE LOWE 65.56 62961 KAYLORS INCORPORATED 305.63 62993 KAYLORS INCORPORATED 190.68 63294 KEATHLEYP ATTERSONE LECTRIC 38.56 62649 KEITH FAULKNER 41.57 62645 KEITH FAULKNER 127.13 63228 KEITH L KELLEY 50.00 62840 KEITH PHIFER 30.00 63317 KELLEYS UPHOLSTERY 5,143.72 63388 KELLIE SHEFFIELD 80.00 62865 KELLfE SHEFFIELD 20.00 63380 KENNETHA . KIRSPEL 576.28 62928 KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. 3,741.00 63674 KESSLERS TEAMS PORTS 788.84 63346 - KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 864.30 63598 KEVIN DANAHER 236.34 62914 KEVIN DANAHER 25.72 63140 KEVIN MARTIN 134.94 63435 KIDS KORNER 856.36 63576 KIM ISGRIG 21.06 63100 KIM PEARSON 66.47 62897 KIM REYNOLDS 62.91 62683 KIMBERLY JANE RUBLE 80.00 63371 KIMMIE CLEVELAND 80.00 63627 KKPT-THE POINT RADIO STATION 3,230.00 63019 KNOWBUDDRYE SOURCES 517.82 62905 KNOWLEDGIEN DUSTRIES INC 1,406.93 62698 KONE INC 497.80 63596 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY co. f INC. 1,506.00 62710 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY co. f INC. 37,715.10 62995 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY co., INC. 130.26 63554 KRISTEN MADDOX 38.22 62896 KRISTIE RATLIFF 17.24 63134 KRISTIE RATLIFF 25.55 63413 KROGERC OMPANY/CAMRPO BINSON 137.97 62711 KROGERC OMPANY/CAMRPO BINSON 150.00 62996 KROGERC OMPANY/INDIANH ILLS 148.17 62712 KROGERC OMPANY/INDIANH ILLS 100 .38 63296 KROGERC OMPANY/INDIANH ILLS 122.67 63555 - KROGERC OMPANY/PERSHING 246.63 62785 KYNYAC OLEMAN 35.00 63076 T-12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER2 006 ACCOUNT LAKESHOREL EARNINGM ATERIALS LAKESHOREL EARNINGM ATERIALS LAKESHOREL EARNINGM ATERIALS LAKEWOOEDL EM ACTIVITY FUND LAKEWOOMD IDDLE SCHOOL LAMONICAM ITCHELL LARA HUMPHRIES LASONYA J TURNER LASONYA J TURNER LAURA JENNINGS LAURA WINTERS LAUREN WALKER LAVONE REDUS LEARNING TODAY INC LEE TACKETT LEON DOREY LGSA LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LINDA B HARPER LINDA P.\" STEWART LINDSEY MAC MILLEN LINDSEY'S BARBECUE LINDSEY'S BARBECUE LINDY THOMPSON LISA GRAY LISA GRAY LISA GRAY LITTLE CAESAR'S GENERAL OFFICE LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITTLE ROCKW INNELSONC O. LITTLE ROCKW INNELSONC O. LONGS ELECTRONICS LONNIE EDWARDS LORRI JOSHUA-BEASLEY LOUIS STINSON LOUIS STINSON LOUIS STINSON T-13 AMOUNT 489.19 282.83 843.88 210.32 400.00 6.13 18. 72 30.00 30.00 155.81 80.26 82.56 11. 34 800.00 543.06 500.00 245.00 65.85 6,681.37 2,840.66 5,732.87 3,882.58 134.17 428.18 7.50 7,875.40 45.00 22.50 3,054.89 25.00 125.00 264.44 212.80 238.01 196.52 20.00 20.00 20.00 140.00 112. 00 603,260.38 268.59 3,910.02 258.78 75.00 30.00 45.00 20.00 20.00 CHK. NO. 62740 63023 63569 63649 63556 59688 V 63152 63366 63623 62940 63017 62779 63464 63566 63148 63429 62820 62999 62587 62618 63178 63233 63244 63248 63455 63505 63696 63700 63724 62837 62861 63470 62714 63557 62780 62814 63068 63610 62863 62871 63298 62723 63306 62716 63064 63631 62803 63061 63605 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT LOWE'S LOWE'S LOWE'S LRP PUBLICATIONS DEPT. 170-F LRP PUBLICATIONS DEPT. 170-F LUCI A STEPHENS LUCI A STEPHENS LUCI A STEPHENS LYNCH DRIVE ELEM ACTIVITY LYNN HARRISON M \u0026amp; M ENTERPRISES MB ELECTRONICS M J COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINES UBSCRIPTIONS MAINSTAGET HEATRICALS UPPLY MAISHA NICOLE JONES MAISHA NICOLE JONES MAJOICE THOMAS MALA ROGERS MALA ROGERS MALA ROGERS MARCIVE, INC MARCIVE, INC MARDELC ORPORATEO FFICE MARENEMIN C MARGARETE STINSON MARGARETE STINSON MARGARETE STINSON MARGARENT ORTON MARI INC. MARIA TOUCHSTONE MARIA TOUCHSTONE MARIA TOUCHSTONE MARIE PIERCE MARIJO VALENTINE MARILYN JOHNSON MARILYN JOHNSON MARSHAS ATTERFIELD MARTHAF EWELL MARTHAN ORTON MARVAS IMS MARY A. WILES MARYC AROLYNE AST MARYC AROLYNE AST MARYC AROLYNE AST MASON ELECTRIC MATTHEWBI NFORD MCCLUREL ANDSCAPING MCKINZIE L RILEY T-14 AMOUNT 443.44 247.03 5,096.97 239.00 257.00 75.00 50.00 25.00 73.64 1,068.23 525.00 34.26 1,384.30 460. 72 42.25 50.00 30.00 52 .26 195.00 63.57 32.52 15.60 7.02 96.98 286.00 45.00 20.00 20.00 26. 46 61.00 28.36 91. 77 22.50 152.34 50.00 22.74 13.38 170.04 9.67 3,587.50 30.00 204.67 41. 87 41. 50 32.95 130.80 10.65 4,700.00 190.00 CHK. NO. 62933 63174 63447 63097 63638 62847 63079 63363 63394 62700 63448 63660 63444 63274 62823 62808 63066 63125 62718 63004 63302 62720 63558 62661 63617 62665 62950 63523 63474 63637 62900 63133 63407 62772 63367 63002 63301 63095 63010 63159 62811 63018 63167 63440 63671 62717 63472 63419 62784 4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT MCKINZIE L RILEY MCM MEADOWPA RKE LEMA CTIVITY FUND MELISSA FARRAR MELISSA WALLS MELISSA WALLS MEMS MET LIFE METAL MART METRO FOODS MICHAEL BLYTHE MICHELLE KEATON MID-SOUTH APPLIANCE PARTS CO. MINDY CARROLL MIRANDAW ALTONS MITCHS TIRE SERVICE MOLLY LEOPARD MOUNTV ERNON-ENOLQAU IZ BOWL MR SOCK MRS CLARKS FOOD MUSIC IS ELEMENTARY MYERS SUPPLY, INC N.L.R. WINTEMPS UPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMPS UPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMPS UPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMPS UPPLY NAEIR NAEIR NANCY STEWART NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NASC/NASSP NASCO NASCO NASDSE NATIONALG EOGRAPHICS CHOOL NATIONALH OMEC ENTER NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION NATIONAL SCHOOL PRODUCTS NC CHILD SUPPORT CENTRALIZED NC CHILD SUPPORT CENTRALIZED NC CHILD SUPPORT CENTRALIZED NCS PEARSON NCTM REGISTRATION NCTM REGISTRATION NCTM-DRAWEAR NEXTEL PARTNERS T-15 AMOUNT 70.00 190.57 103.79 29. 97 50.00 30.00 1,400.00 6,584.40 512.69 4,529.30 28.04 85.84 83.53 105.73 27.26 995.00 80.00 50.00 200.00 307.50 29.95 707.06 1,875.00 1,305.40 32.44 227.15 40.00 100.33 205.73 270.68 888.00 273.52 141.56 28.00 1,407.46 103.74 346.50 7,150.26 33.89 211.18 327.65 137.00 137.00 137.00 2,996.98 1,648.00 1,074.00 15.16 8,573.99 CHK. NO. 63048 62862 63650 63384 62851 63083 63127 63465 62880 62860 63459 63153 62721 62781 62834 62906 63286 62697 63070 62734 62706 62932 62722 63009 63305 63560 62769 63590 62879 62696 62980 63282 63544 62729 62724- 63561 63350 62953 62726 62881 62727 62609 63203 63688 62911 62715 63001 63567 63343 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLRSD TRANSPORTATIOND EPT. NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD-BACKGROUNCDH ECK NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE NO. LITTLE ROCKE DUCATORSC RED NO. LITTLE ROCKW INNELSONC O. NO. LITTLE ROCKW INNELSONC O. NO. LITTLE ROCKW INNELSONC O. NORCOMIN C NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVITY NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVITY NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM ACTIVITY NORTHL ITTLE ROCKC HAMBERO F NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY COMPA NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY COMPA NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY COMPA NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH POINT FORD OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL OCCUPATIONAHL EALTHC ENTERSO F OCCUPATIONAHL EALTHC ENTERSO F OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYG ENERAL T-16 AMOUNT 5.07 5.07 10,885.75 5,320.00 4 65. 60 15,133.75 78,460.80 380.46 195.74 488.36 50.10 32.21 116.85 188.62 12.00 863.45 78.00 273.00 1,080.00 518.00 432.38 496.25 316.32 333.50 195.26 261.86 64.56 140.80 19.72 41.97 223.45 1,516.19 37,807.20 30,818.84 306.23 80.00 315.00 38.00 2,720.66 1,681.03 2,720.66 1,830.69 2,720.66 1,679.49 2,596.83 3,881.73 1,428.58 1,022.30 64.62 CHK. NO. 62728 63307 63331 63438 63500 63490 63497 62730 63309 63562 62773 62886 63395 63651 63308 62647 63310 63406 63677 63692 62731 63011 63311 63563 62646 63208 63229 63493 63720 62732 63013 63564 62976 63538 63007 63374 63122 63396 62599 62627 63192 63211 63679 63704 62855 63086 63372 63626 62638 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYG ENERAL OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYG ENERAL ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY, INC. ORIENTHAL NEWBURN OSI EDUCATION SERVICES OSI EDUCATION SERVICES OSI EDUCATION SERVICES OTIS RAY BANKS OTIS RAY BANKS PACHECOO UTDOORE QUIPMENT PAGES OF PARENTING PAMELA JACKSON PAMELA JACKSON PAR INC PAR INC PATRICIA MAYS PATSY A RHOADES PAULA K URTON PAULA K URTON PAULA MCCARTHER PEACHTREEB USINESS PRODUCTS PEARSON EDUCATION PEARSON EDUCATION PEARSON EDUCATION PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICES PEER TUTOR PRESS PENNY ELLIOTT PERFORMANCLEE ARNINGI NC. PERMA-BOUND PERMA-BOUND PFG LITTLE ROCK PHYLLIS THOMPSON PHYLLIS THOMPSON PIPE \u0026amp; TUBE SUPPLY PLANK ROAD PUBLISHING POE TRAVEL PORTFOLIOR ECOVERYA SSOCIATES PORTFOLIOR ECOVERYA SSOCIATES PORTFOLIOR ECOVERYA SSOCIATES POSITIVE PROMOTIONS POSITIVE PROMOTIONS POSTMASTER, SHERWOOD POSTMASTER, SHERWOOD PPG ARCHITECTURALF INISHES PRISCILLA BENSON PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA PROMOTIONSP LUS T-17 AMOUNT 64.62 64.62 209.68 150.00 89.98 89.98 89.98 20.00 20.00 246.71 399.97 25.00 20.00 1,005.53 127.60 6.10 25.00 50.00 20.00 1,065.00 346.50 12.67 942.08 5,302.98 1, 968. 7 5 274.95 275.64 96.15 2,443.91 223.57 14,894.65 50.00 30.00 113. 01 138.10 121. 00 187.45 285.34 161.82 147.20 132.40 156.00 48.00 801.06 23.00 3,413.91 3,413.91 3,915.48 222.36 CHK. NO. 63221 63713 63588 62836 62604 63197 63682 63072 63614 62922 63345 62809 63608 63157 63667 63466 62804 62845 63362 63602 63376 62902 62920 63146 63428 62675 62826 62770 62699 63284 62737 62791 63054 62654 63107 63300 62639 63222 63714 62878 63115 63074 63075 63033 63463 62597 63188 63515 63103 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER20 06 ACCOUNT PUBLIC EMPLOYEESR ETIREMENTS Y PUBLIC EMPLOYEESR ETIREMENTS Y PUBLIC EMPLOYEESR ETIREMENTS Y PUBLIC EMPLOYEESR ETIREMENTS Y PUBLIC EMPLOYEESR ETIREMENTS Y  PUBLIC SCHOOL VEHICLE PROGRAM PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE PURCHASE POWER PYRAMID INTERIORS PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS QUALITYW HOLESALEB UILDING RADIO SHACK RADIO SHACK RADIOLOGYA SSOCIATES, P.A. RADIOLOGYA SSOCIATES, P.A. RADIOLOGYA SSOCIATES, P.A. RAINBOWB OOKC OMPANY RANDALLH SANDEFUR RANDALLH SANDEFUR RANDALLH SANDEFUR RANDY SANDEFUR RANDY SANDEFUR RAY C HARVEY RAY C HARVEY RAY HANKINS RAYMONGDE DDESA ND COMPANY READING TREE PRODUCTIONS REALLY GOOD STUFF INC REBECCA R CARR REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC REGINALD D MARTIN REGINALD JOHNSON REGIONALA DJUSTMENTB UREAUI NC REGIONALA DJUSTMENTB UREAUI NC REGIONALA DJUSTMENTB UREAUI NC RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS RENAISSANCEL EARNINGI NC RENAISSANCEL EARNINGI NC RESOURCESF OR READINGI NC REXEL DAVIES REXEL DAVIES RHONDAB ANKS RHONDAD ICKEY RHONDAR OOK RICHARD ALEXANDER RITA CASEY ROBERT A MAJOR JR T-18 AMOUNT 1,945.70 2,156.32 387.41 148.00 2,169.91 1,135.00 19,755.00 316.52 1,433.05 1,929.85 58.98 532.65 2,127.60 39.13 48.68 20.00 20.00 20.00 1,543.29 20.00 20.00 20.00 101.06 974.00 20.00 20.00 203.70 154.57 16.50 18.95 2,807.22 3,528.68 90.00 70.00 62.61 62.61 62.61 860. 40 85.25 456.69 53.95 202.04 130.80 18.56 38.51 15.00 67.39 150.00 25.00 CHK. NO. 62620 63235 63249 63456 63725 62677 62856 63299 63003 62929 63171 63442 63647 63022 63315 62635 63218 63710 63059 62849 63081 63620 63109 63389 62839 63615 62918 63098 62792 62904 62892 62739 62833 62831 62606 63200 63685 63656 62757 63582 63135 62687 63535 62889 63338 63414 6308\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1788","title":"Court filings regarding Joshua intervenors' witness list, notice for substitution of counsel, two Office of Desegregation Management reports, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, Joshua intervenors' response to motion for contempt and motion for disqualification.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2006-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Education--Arkansas","School districts","Little Rock School District","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Joshua intervenors","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project management","Education--Evaluation","African Americans--Education","School board members","School principals","Franklin Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Cloverdale Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School improvement programs","School administrators"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding Joshua intervenors' witness list, notice for substitution of counsel, two Office of Desegregation Management reports, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool, Joshua intervenors' response to motion for contempt and motion for disqualification."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1788"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["98 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, Joshua intervenors' witness list; District Court, notice for substitution of counsel; District Court, entry of appearance; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''2006-07 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Update on the Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) Implementation of the Staffing Provisions of Plan 2000''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, Joshua intervenors' response to motion for contempt and motion for disqualification    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    \u0026gt; I :e I Ut.C. 8.2006 1:43PM JOHN W WALKER PA N0.273 JOHN W. WALKERJ P.A. Attorney at Law 1723 Broadway Lirrle Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (50/) 374--3758 Fa.~ (501) J7-l--1187 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET P.1/12 YOU SHOULD RECEIVE [ _ (including cover sheet)] PAGE(S). INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL \"\u0026lt;{SOI) 374-3758\u0026gt;\" The information contuned in th is facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidenti!l,l information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader oftl,is message is not the intended recipient, or the einployee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intctlded recipient. you are hereby notified that any di$semination, diSll'ibution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have   receive4 this communication in error, please immediate notify us by telephone, ~d return the oriiinal message to us at the above address via the U.S. PoStal Service. Thank you. DEC. 8 .2006 1: 43PM JOHN W WALKER PA JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. AT'I'ORNEY AT LAW . 1'723 BROADWAY LlT'rL.8 Rocx, ARKANSAS 7.2.206 TELEPHONE (501) 374--3768 FAX(501)374:-4187 JOHN W. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS Email: johnwalkeratty@aol.eoui Honorable Judge William R Wtlson United States District Court Judge 6-00 West Capitol. Suite 423 Little Rocle, Arkansas 72201 Via Facsimile - 604--5149 December 8. 2006 N0.273 P.2/12 OFCOUNSEI., ROBERT M.eBENEY. P.A. DONNA J. Mu!ENRY 8210 Hi:NDER8oN ROAD Lrrru; Roa. ARKAN8A4 1l2lO 'PHONE: (501) 3'7l-34.25  FtJ. (501) 3'123428 Email: mcbamyd@swbell.net Re: Little Rock School District, et al. v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. Case No. 4:82CV0866WRW/JTR ' Dear Judge Wtlson: Per the Court letter Order ofDecembet\" 6, 2006, Joshua Intervenors submit the following: - A. Witnesses: Mr. Charles Armstrong [25 minutesJ He will testify that he has not been informed by Dr. Roy Brooks of the Court's requirements, of the district's activities regarding program evaluation and assessment; that it appears that the district does not focus its attention upon achievement of African Amerioan students and that he has no indication that program evaluation is embedded in the district's cuniculum and instructional programs. He wm. testify that it appears that the efforts of the district are devoted to creating an environment attractive to white students and their parents. He will also testify that when he and other board members sought information regarding program evaluation, the director was removed from her position; and that district counsel has not provided information to him regarding the process and the status of the 1 . - -------------------------- JJt.C. B.2006 1:43PM JOHN W WALKER P A N0.273 P.3/ 12 district, s compliance, Dr. Victoria Bemb.ardt [ 45 minutes] She bas expertise in the preparation and I manipulation of school data bases, facilitating the assessment and evaluation of educational programs for effectiveness in buil~ student achievement. She provided training to PRE staff regarding such sY~~. She identified an existing \"data warehouse\" methodology designed for use in school systems; to facilitate their assessment and evaluation of programs for effectiveness in building student achievement. While presentations regarding this system were made to LRSD, it was not adopted. This system could have been operative in the LRSD by mid October, 2006 had it been adopted. MJ. Lisa Black (30 minutes] She will testify that she bas significant evaluation and assessment obligations for the LRSD and that her activities are unknown to PRE or ODM She will also testify that she bas refused to provide information to Joshua regarding the evaluation - and assessments undertaking that she performs for the LRSD, as a private contractor on the public payroll. Mr. Tom Brode [ 20 minutes] See description of Mr. Tony Rose's testimony below. Dr. Roy Brooks [30 minutes] His lack of knowledge about the court's requirements and PRE compliance efforts and his affirmative actions designed to dirlnish the supplying of imormation to ODM and Joshua regarding the status of compliance with the 2004 remedy. Ms. Diane Curry [ 25 minutes] Her testimony will be similar to that of newly elected fellow board member Charles Armstrong. Dr. Michael Daugherty [25 minutes] His testimony will be similar to that of fellow board members Cbarles Armstrong and Di~e Cuny, He VJill also testify that he is unaware of 2 JVHN W WHLK~~ ~ H N0.273 P.4/ 12 any spcci:.fic programs which have worked to sigoifiC3lltly improve the academic achievement of African American students in the LRSD. Dr. Karen DeJamette (2 hours] [l] The LRSD has not at all relevant times provided the staff in its PRE department required by the 2004 Compliance Remedy. [2] The LRSD assigned additional duties to PRE staff; a filctor which played a role in l..RSD's failure to complete tasks required by the 2004 Compliance Remedy and necessary to embed the comprehensive program assessment process as a permanent part of the LR.SD' cuni.culwn and instruction program. Thus: [aJ In the preparation of the 8 \"formal step 2\" evaluatio11$, ''PRE staff have not been involved in observing programs, fonnulating the content of questionnaires, or writing the evaluation reports. Building the abilities of the PRE staff to conduct program evaluations without the assistance of PRE staff to conduct program evaluations without the assistanceof outside evaluators ( or to supplement the efforts of outside evaluators) was necessary to embed the program assessment process in the operations ofLRSD. [b] LR.SD has failed to make feasible and adequate progress - .in the creation of computer data bases needed to embed the comprehensive program assessment process in the district's instructional programs. It is and has been feasi'ble for LRSD to create one or more computer data bases allowing compilation and manipulation of many forms of data and variables. Such data and variables could be manipulated to prepare assessments/evaluations. For example, one could compare test outcomes for similar elementary students from two schools exposed to two different r~ programs, taking account as well as student and teacher absences in the relevant period. [3] LR.SD' s \"quarterly written updates\" show work on \"school'' and \"district\"\" \"portfolios\" - compilations of data like that listed in paragraph (2-b] [E.g., updates of9-1-0S at 3; 12-1-05 at 3; 6-1-03 at 3] [a] Although L.RSD first mentioned \"school 3 JOHN W WALKER PA N0.273 P.S/ 12 portfolios\" in its quarterly report of 9-1-05 at 3, corrections in the \"Little Rock: School District's Revised Compliance Report\" of October 25, 2006,\" early in the 2006-07 school year,\" show that \"LR.SD expects to ~ the creation of school portfolios during the 2007-0S school year.\" [ At 7, para. 14; emphasis added] [b] The quarterly update dated 12-1 05 states: '--\"Data to be included in the district portfolio was designed. As new data becomes available, PRE staff members add them to the portfolio.\" [At 3] One can not determined the state of completeness of the \"district portfolio,\" compared to what needs to be accomplished from the LllSD' s Revised Compliance Report,\" 10-25-06 at 6-7]. [4] The quarterly update of12-1..05 states (at 3): \"PRE is slso investigating the costs and benefits of an internet-based data warehouse system that would store all data collected by the district within one database, support its tabulation and analysis, and enable its electronic access at any time. The data warehouse would advance the district portfolio that PRE staff members are - . currently developing.\" The (lllarterly updm:e of3-l--06 states (at 3): \"To suppon the portfolio's expansion, frequent updates, and future utility, PRE is designing a 'data warehouse' which LRSD staff and others can consult on a 'real-time' basis.\" PRE identified a data warehouse system which could have been finlctioning as one of the LRSD's recent submission of its compliance reports. See \"Compliance History\" prepared by PRE at page 2, para., 3 (a)J. Upper level LRSD administrator rejected this proposal. One consequence of this action is that facts about students and teachers participating in panieular programs continue to be difficult to retrieve. [ls!.. at para. 3 (c)] No data warehouse system is in place. [5] Additional work is necessary to insure the accuracy ofLRSD data needed for assessments and evaluations. [Id., para. 2; para. 4 (PRE Compliance History\") [ 6] Some LRSD representatives censored the eighth update, prepared by 4 - -- -- - - ----------- - - - ------ - - - --- JOHN W WALKER PA N0 . 273 P.6/ 12 PRE stat: to minimize the notice of some compliance probletQS noted in this document. See \"Compliance History\" prepared by PRE at page 2. para., 4. PJ The LRSD superintendent interfered with the flow of information to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors. See Compliance History\" prepared by PRE at 3, para. 7(a) (The superintendent threatened . . . (the dismissal (of PRE' s Director] if she shared information with ODM or Joshua.\"). [8] The LRSD reorganization in 2005 created a conflict situation for PRE staff and the school system regarding the content of assessments/evaluations. PRE previously reported directly to the Superintendent. A$ a result of the reorganization, PRE now reports to the Asrociate Superintendent in charge of instructional programs. [9] The work of PRE staff bas been frustrated by the failure of senior administrators and counsel to communicate and provide direction regarding how to proceed in meeting commitments in the Compliance Remedy. See paragraph 7 of the PRE. \"Compliance History . \" [10] Upon her hiring as PRE Director and her reading of the 2004 Compliance Remedy, she - understood that she had major responsibilities flowing from the court's 2004 remedy. She sought to fulfill these responsioilities in a diligent manner, to provide information to ODM and Joshua Intervenors consistent with their responsibilities under the remedy, and to be frank and honest in reporting on the status of compliance. She perceives that she has been suspended and faces termination for her efforu. Ms. Ethel Dunb~ [15 mim.ltes] She is the principal ofFranklinElementary school, a racially identifiable elementary school. She has not received training on how she can use district and school portfolios to assess the effectiveness of educational programs in her schools designed to improve African American achievement. She has not been illfonned that such portfolios are available for her use, or been provided assessments for programs at her school based upon the 5 JUHN W WHLK~~ PA N0.273 P .7/12 use of such materials by oth~ persons. Mr. Freddie Fields ( 15 minutes) He is the principal of Cloverdale Middle SchooL a racially identifiable middle school. He has not received the training on how be can use district and school portfolios to assess the effectiveness of educational programs in bis school designed to improve Afiican American achievement. He has not been informed that such portfolios are available for his use, or been provided assessments of programs at hls school based on the use of such material by other persons. He is also not familiar with the SMART/THRIVE programs which the district has identmed as one of the programs that has been deeply imbedded with ongoing assessments. Ms. Mebnie Fox (25 minutes] Her testimony will be similar to that _of Mr. Armstrong and Ms. C\\lil'Y. She will also testify that she bas been integrally involved with district activities for three (3) years. Ms. Beverly Griffen [IO minutes] She will discuss her involvement regarding the posting of the gltl Quarterly Update for the Board review and comments. Mr. Gene Jones (45 minutes] He will discuss his monitoring efforts, ODM 's attempts to assist the district with the compliance requirements, his interaction '\\Jlith PRE staff, his awareness of the dilectory requests by district counsel for extensions for extensions of time, promises made for followup work by district counsel which were unmet, LRSD' s failure to embed the an effective evaluation ai:t\u0026lt;I assessment pr-ocess into the LRSD's curriculum and instructional programs, his awareness of upper level district officials unhappiness with Dr. DeJamette and their circumvention of her through use of Dr. Ed Williams in a way which 6 JOHN W WALKER PA N0.273 P.8/ 12 undermined and otherwise divided the PRE staff. He will discuss other failing'S of the district with respect to the court's order. Mr. Chris Heller [30 minutes] He will discuss: a) directions to PRE not to cooperate except through him with ODM and Joshua; b) his unavailability and unresponsiveness to PRE for assistance subsequent to the last hearing before the court; c) promises made to provide information to Joshua and ODM in August, 2006 which were not kept; d) his refusal to make timely requests for extensions of time in violation of the court's November 29, 2005 order; e) his rewriting the gill Quarterly report .so as to mislead the court and to distort the status of compliance as represented by PRE st.aft; his advice to senior administrators nt to cooperate with PRE, Joshua and ODM; and t) his recommendation to Dr. Brooks to terminate Dr. DeJarnette. Dr. Katherine M\"rtc:hell [30 minutes] She will address the same issues as the other board members and she will opine that the senior administration did not intend to fully comply ~h the - court's ordei-. Ms. Margie Powell [ 25 miuutes] -Her areas willoverlap those ofMr. Gene Jones. She ~ also ~lain how the district's failure to timely comply and to otherwise obstruct compliance worked to prevent the embedding of an effective evaluation and assessment process. She will also discuss Mr. Heller's editing the 81b Quanerly Update so as to delete pages 2-6 of the draft therefrom. Mr. Tony Rose [20 mimrtesJ He is a former member of the LR.SD Board who directed the administration to be negative to the cooperation of ODM and Joshua with respect to the Compliance Remedy. He will also testify that he never became aware of the progress of PRE activities after 2004 and that he requested no reports of PRE regarding compliance before 7 JOHN W WALKER PA N0.273 P.9/ 12 September, 2006. Joshua ~ill seek to establish that it was Mr. Rose's guidance to Dr. Brooks and senior administrators which helped to create a lack of diligent, good faith compliance with the 2004 compliance remedy by upper level administration. Moreover, he did not agree with the court's compliance remedy. Dr. Steven Rou (30 mimrtes] He and bis colleagues received full cooperation from Dr. DeJarnette and other members of the PRE staff: Upper level administrators exhibited disinterest in the evaluation process. In the course of completing the evaluations problems regarding inaccurate data arose. He will be asked about the descriptions of programs in the four 2005-2006 evaluations. He is unfamiliar regarding the activities undertaken by LRSD with respect to embedding the comprehensive assessment process. Mr. John Ruffin [15 minutes] He is the Director of Information Technology. He will testify that is unaware of any process that is complete or substantially complete which has - embedded the evaluation process into the district curriculum. He will also testify that bis office had only become involved in the process in the last 6 months and that he had no earthly idea of what the court bas required. Ms. Joy Spl'll;lgtr [l hour] She will testify in a manner consistent with b.er affidavit filed on June 28, 2006. Ms. Springer will provide testimony regarding her monitoring activities. She will also provide examples of information requests made on behalf of the Joshua Intervenors which LRSD did not respond. Mr. James Wohlleb [ 45 minutes] He will testify regarding PRE work activities, cooperation or lack thereof from the administration, failure of support by the administration, the importance of the process and how it is integral for raising the achievement level of the majority N0.273 P.10/ 12 of the students in the district. He will also address the administration's efforts to undcmune the leadership ofDr. DeJarnette. B. Exhibiq,_ The numbers indicated below may not be the order presented at the hearing. 1. Court's Order of June 30, 2004 2. Court's Order ofNpvember 29, 2005 3. LRSD' s Programs Interventions and Models in LRSD Schools 4. Guidelines for Completing Program Evaluations by Steven M. Ross, PhD 5. LRSD Comprehensive Program Assessment Process NEPN Code: IL-R 6. LRSD Program Evaluation Agenda NEPN Code: IL-R posted on website . 7. Letter to Dr. DeJarnette dated March 17, 2005 8. Letter to Dr. DeJarnette dated May 24, 2005 9. Letter to Dr. DeJamette dated December I, 2005 10. Letter to Chris Heller dated October 3, 2006 11. Letter to Chris Heller dated Aui:,aust 17, 2 006 12. LRSD's Quarterly Update filed September 1, 2006 13. LRSD's draft Quanerly Update for September 1, 2006 14. LRSD's Compliance Report :filed October 16, 2006 15. Joshua Intervenors Objections to Compliance Report 16. Letter to Dr. Katherine Mitchell dated 11/3/06 from Dr. DeJarnette w/atta.chments 17. Pre -K Literacy Evaluation pages 180, 192, 234 . 18. Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs Evaluation Report (2005-2006) page 9 I -I N0 .273 P.11/12 19. Emails dated 7/14/06 between DeJamette and Griffen regarding status on compliance report with attachment 20. Cover Pages of the eight (8) Step 2 Evaluations 21. PRE Comments on 10-16-06 Compliance Report filed by Chris Heller 22. LRSD's Eight (8) Quarterly Report Updates 23. LRSD'sReorganization Audit dated March, 2005 24. LRSD Guiding Principles 25. Miscellaneous emails between PRE, district administration, district counsel and Joshua. 26. Joslwa reserves the right to introduce rebuttal exhibits regarding witnesses testimony. In addition, Joshua reserves the right to supplement this list based upon documents provided by LRSD counsel that was requested several weeks ago. - C. Matters regarding the Subject 9f Media Reports Dr. Roy Brooks has displaced Dr. Karen DeJarnette as Director of PRE, has placed Dr. Ed Williams in het position and has advertised Dr. Williams' position as a vacancy. He did so after the Board requested that she appear before it. Consequently Mr. Chris Heller and Dr. Brooks hired the Quattlebaum law firm to investigate a grievance that had been filed by Dr. DeJarnette. The matter became public when presented by Mr. Heller and Mr. Quattlebaum in a public meeting to the school board. Her grievance still pends. Joshua believes that appropriate grounds e\u0026gt;dst for the Court's intervention in that it appears that the Court's order is being flaunted by the adverse action which followed her response to the Board as requested by the Board and as required by the Court's order. Joshua reserves the right to address this matter 10 I I - Ut.l.... ts. C:~lab 1 : 4 f t-'M JOHN W WALKER P A N0.273 P. 12/ 12 subsequently in order that the Court's supremacy with respect to its orders be duly respected by those charged to implement it. Joshua notes that the Court pointedly directed counsel to be frugal and cost conscious in their representation of the LRSD. LRSD claims that economics required it to reduce PRE st.at: yet LR.SD appears to have given unlimited access to the district check book to the law firms involved for the purpose of undermining Dr. DeJarnette and PRE. D. Mr. Burnett and Mr; Ouattleb\u0026amp;wn It is not ne~ary for either of these gentlemen or their firms to be involved in this proceeding. Mr. Quattlebaum has absolutcly nothing to contribute to this endeavor. :Mt. Burnette is representing Dr. DeJamette individually. Her matter is not presently before the Court in that she has not exhausted her internal remedies as set forth by Arkansas state law. Undersigned counsel does not purport to represent her interests. All references to her interests - are made because of the proposition that those who do the work of the court, as a matter of public policy, cannot and should not be subject to retaliation or reprisal. JWW:js cc: Mr. Chris Heller Honorable Judge Thomas Ray . 11 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ARKANSAS MIKE BEEBE Scott P. Richardson Assistant Attorney General Direct dial: (501) 682-1019 E-mail: scott. richardson@arkansasag.gov December 11 , 2006 Mr. Norman J. Chachklin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Find, Inc. New York 99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. William P. Thompson Mr. James M. Llewellyn, Jr. Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818  Re: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. USDC No. LR-C-82-866 Dear .Gentlemen: Please find enclosed a copy of the Motion for Substitution of Counsel and Entry of Appearance that were filed in the above referenced matter. Please contact me at (501) 682-1019 if you have any questions or need additional information. SPR/pjd Sincerely, k~ Scott P. Richardson Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street  Suite 1100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501 ) 682-2007  FAX (5 01 ) 682-2591 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4073 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL BNIHO!INOW NOl!Y93H93S30 ~03~,~~o 900Z SI J30 C3Al303~ PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS Separate Defendant Arkansas Department of Education (ADE), by and through its attorney, Assistant Attorney General Scott P. Richardson, and for its Motion for Substitution of Counsel, states: 1. Assistant Attorney General Mark Hagemeier has recently changed responsibilities in the Attorney General's Office. 2. Assistant Attorney General Scott P. Richardson has been given responsibility as lead attorney for this case. WHEREFORE, Separate Defendant Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) requests that Assistant Attorney General Mark Hagemeier be withdrawn from this case and that Assistant Attorney General Scott P. Richardson be substituted in his stead and for all other just and proper relief to which they may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, MIKE BEEBE Attorney General BY: Isl Scott P. Richardson RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING SCOTTP. RICHARDSON, BarNo. 01208 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4073 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 2 of 3 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 1100 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 (501) 682-1019 direct (501) 682-2591 facsimile Emai I: scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov ATTORNEYS FOR SEPARATE DEFENDANT ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 11, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: Mr. Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com Mr. Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com Mr. John Clayburn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@comcast.net Mr. Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier(a),arkansasag.gov Mr. Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com Mr. Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj .com Mr. Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@k! bmlaw.net Ms. Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net Mr. John W. Walker johnwalkerattv@aol.com 2 I --- - Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4073 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 3 of 3 I, Scott P. Richardson, Assistant Attorney General, do hereby certify that I have served the foregoing by depositing a copy in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on December 11 , 2006, to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Mr. Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Mr. William P. Thompson Mr. James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 7220 l Isl Scott P. Richardson SCOTT P. RICHARDSON 3 Page 1 of2 Patsy Dooley From: ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov Sent: Monday, December 11 , 2006 10:34 AM To: ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al \"Motion to Substitute Attorney\" ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was received from Richardson, Scott Paris entered on 12/11/2006 at 10:33 AM CST and filed on 12/ 11 /2006 Case Name: Case Number: Filer: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al 4:82-cv-866 Arkansas, State of Arkansas Department of Education WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Docume,nt Number: 4073 Docket Text: MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Arkansas Department of Education, Arkansas, State of. (Richardson, Scott) The following docurnent(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=l2/l l /2006] [FileNumber=799638-0 ] [13349957099b9f6d33537ed0032adf7a072d99abel28b653605d3b4ef5512956dbc fl dd4a4a350dfbf4 70dcdl b 1 beaefl 0dafe587da7725403debb l 3bal 80884]] 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com John Clayburn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@comcast.net, yeldnef@yahoo.com Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov, angela.dover@arkansasag.gov; 12/1 1/2006 , ' .. agcivil@arkansasag.gov ,. Christopher J. Heller heller@fec .net, brendak@fec.net; tmiller@fec .net M. Samuel Jones , III sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj .com, kate.jones@jlj .com; linda.calloway@jlj.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@k! bmlaw.net, nrnoler@kbmlaw.net Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, patsy.dooley@arkansasag.gov; agcivil@arkansasag.gov Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net, scstreett@yahoo.com Page 2 of2 John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap72297@aol.com; jspringer@gabrielmail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little R;ock, AR 7220 i-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 12/11/2006 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4072 Filed 1211112006 Page 1 of 3 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Assistant Attorney General Scott P. Richardson, who is admitted to practice in the Eastern District of Arkansas, hereby enters his appearance ih this case as counsel for Defendant Arkansas Department of Education. Respectfu11y submitted, MIKE BEEBE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Isl Scott P. Richardson RECEIVED DEC 1 3 2006 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING SCOTT P. RICHARDSON, Bar No. 01208 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 1100 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 (501) 682-1019 direct (501) 682-2591 facsimile Email: scott.richardson@arkansasag.goy COUNSEL FOR SEPARATE DEFENDANT ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 11 , 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CMIECF system, which sha11 send notification of such filing to the following: .-- Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4072 Filed 12/11/2006 Page, 2 of 3 Mr. Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com Mr. Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com Mr. John Clayburn Fendley, Jr clayfendley@comcast.net Mr. Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov Mr. Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net  Mr. M. Samuel Jones , III sjones@mwsgw.com Mr. Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com Mr. Philip E. Kaplan . pkaplan@k!bmlaw.net Ms. Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.riet Mr. John W. Walker johnwalkeratty(@ao l.com I, Scott P. Richardson, Assistant Attorney General, do hereby certify that I have served the foregoing by depositing a copy in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on December 11, 2006, to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Mr. Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Mr. William P. Thompson Mr. James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 2 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4072 Filed )2/11 /2006 .Page 3 of 3 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 . ( /s/ Scott P. Richardson SCOTT P. RICHARDSON 3 Page 1 of2 Patsy Dooley From: / ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov \\ Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1 0: 31 AM To: ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al \"Notice of Appearance\" ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was received from Richardson, Scott Paris entered on 12/ 11 /2006 at 10:31 AM CST and filed on 12/11/2006 Case Name: Case Number: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al 4:82-cv-866 Filer: Arkansas,. State of Arkansas Department of Education WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 4072 ' -- Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Paris Richardson on behalf of Arkansas Department of Education, Arkansas, State of (Richardson, Scott) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: , [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=l2/ l l /2006] [FileNurnber=799633-0 ] [9e40375cd08dc8 l ae09cDfe0866 l aabff78 l 613add66602 l 6dfb0el 85bf55c8ae5 d2ef8fe0de33306f01J787el4dl8ecf4e456ad8dab9d2cd2a7864e4cc5022]] 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com Mark Terry Burnette mbumette@mbbwi.com '- John Clayburn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@comcast.net, yeldnef@yahoo.com Mark Arnold Hagemeier mark.hagemeier@arkansasag.gov, angela.dover@arkansasag.gov; 12/11/2006 agci vil@arkansasag.gov - Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec.net; tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, kate.jones@jlj.com; linda.calloway@jlj.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@k! brnlaw.net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, patsy.dociley@arkansasag.gov; agcivil@arkansasag.gov Sharon Carden Streett scstreett@comcast.net, scstreett@yahoo.com Page 2 of 2 John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, lorap72297@aol.com; jspringer@gabrielmail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice will be delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 12/ 11 /2006 II  II I I I I I I -  I I I I I I \"I I rr J:ILED f  ., u.l. DISTRICT couRr  EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS DEC 12 2006 JAMES W. McCORMACK CLERK By I 2006-07 ENROLLMENT AND RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE DEP CLERK PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Horace R. Smith Monitor December 12, 2006 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Polly Ramer Office Manager ' ' --- - ' ' -- .. -- I I I 1 -  -- - UPDATE ON THE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STAFFING PROVISIONS OF PLAN 2000 . Margie L. Powell Monitor December 15, 2006 Office of Desegregation Monitoring U.S. District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Horace R. Smith Monitor : ~- IA8T~f J~ill~~SA8 DEC 15 2000 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By--------=o=EP=-c::-LERK= Gene Jones Monitor ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF Dr. T. Kenneth James, Commissioner .Educatilfn 4 State Capitol Mall  Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 (501) 682-4475 http://ArkansasEd.org December 20, 2006 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 RECEIVED Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones  Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III JAN - 3 200j OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: .fer an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of December 2006 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair: Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Vice Chair: Randy Lawson, Bentonville Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Dr. Calvin King, Marianna  Dr. Tim Knight, Arkadelphia Dr .. Ben Mays, Clinton  Mary Jane Rebick, Little Rock  Dr. Naccaman Williams, Springdale An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for November 2006. Respectfully Submitted, Scott Smith, ar # 922 1 General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on December 20, 2006, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 . Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr.M. SamuelJones,ll Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 kit~ Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court.  This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of1Eiecember 31, 2006  .m:.9iiJ5eJJoto1~uwiEia6lm\u0026amp;fi@aviiii6efaa12oaa~era@1aiwm State1Eouriaaticm$iindjrdlfllll:1~I\u0026lt;fflEoi'eittcf6etio8ijfagfflsJMUI B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. RECEIVED JAN - 3 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OFFICE OF EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DESEGREGATION MONITORING WESTERJ.'-T DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CASE NO. 4:82CV866WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1 ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS JOSHUA INTERVNORS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION On June 30, 2004, the court instructed the parties to cooperate in addressing their concerns with respect to implementation of the Court's directive regarding assessing programs designed to improve the academic achievement of African American students. The District appealed. The Court entered a separate Order to the effect that without or without an appeal the Court expected its Order to be implemented pendente lite. Rather than participate directly in the implementation process, Mr. Heller placed all of his eggs in one basket expecting the court's remedy to be overturned. Mr. Heller raised no questions regarding Joshua's continuing participation in the local PRE work until after the Court of Appeals affirmed this Court's Order. Ivfr. Heller and undersigned counsel had continuing disagreements regarding what information Joshua was to receive from PRE. Joshua, on the other hand, received its information in the same manner as it had previously done through October, 2006. Before that time, Mr. Heller did not 1 present to the Court any concerns that Joshua exceeded its bounds with respect to monitoring. Indeed, no motion to that effect has ever been filed. The instant proceeding is before the Court because :tvfr. Heller now has to regard the . interests of African American children and to provide more respect to the African American school board members than he did before. Before 2004, when the Court's remedy was set forth, Mr. Heller disregarded the two African American board members, Dr. Katherine Mitchell and Mr. Michael Daugherty. During the fall, Nfr. Heller opposed relief being sought by Nfr. Charles Armstrong and Ms. Dianne Curry with respect to their school board election campaigns. He continued to oppose those two board members until December 15, 2006 when an Order was entered dismissing their case intervention. He was in the unenviable position of opposing them in one action and representing them in another action. This appears to be a violation of ethics rules as well but is not being presented for the Court's present decision. Despite Nfr. Heller's antagonism to Nfr. Armstrong and Ms. Curry, they won school board seats. As of October, 2006, they joined Nfr. Daugherty and Dr. Mitchell to form a majority Africci American school board. It was only after this event that Nfr. Heller raised the issue of improper contact with his \"clients\" before the Court. The further background of this matter involves Dr. DeJarnette. Between June, 2006 and November, 2006, she made frequent complaints that she was being obstructed by the administration and not aided by Nfr. Heller in the PRE's efforts to comply with the Court 's order. The PRE's September draft report for the Court expressed PRE's concerns about noncompliance. The draft September report had initially been presented to the school administration in mid August, 2006. The response of:tvfr. Heller was to exclude from the Court 's 2 September final report the concerns which the PRE eA1Jressed in the draft report. When Mr. Heller learned that the September draft report had been shared with Joshua and ODM, he found no fault with that. (In the past, some draft reports had been shared with ODM and Joshua.) On August 4, 2006, Mr. Heller met with Joshua and ODM for more than an hour regarding concerns raised by Joshua to the effect that there were compliance issues outstanding. The meeting concluded upon l\\tfr. Heller's promise _that he would obtain further information regarding the issues raised by Joshua and ODM and that he would promptly get back ODM and Joshua. The meeting between Joshua and Heller was directed by the Court and coordinated by ODM in the manner contemplated by the Court. Despite his commitment, ]\\,fr. Heiler never met again with Joshua and ODM to further address the concerns presented at that c_ourt directed meeting. The Court subsequently inquired whether Joshua and LRSD were still at \"loggerheads\" to which Joshua replied in the affirmative. Mr. Heller's first acknowledgment of subsequent availability for the followup meeting came on November 1, 2006. See Exhibits 1 and 2. This was after newly elected Board President Dr. Katherine Mitchell requested that Dr. DeJarnette address the status of compliance with the Court's order and after the Board majority had shifted. At that point, Mr. Heller had been identified as an obstructor of the Court's Order and an accomplice of the school administration in seeking to retaliate against Dr. DeJarnette for sharing . her concerns with the Court, ODM, Joshua and the Board. What is before the Court are Joshua's objections to court release of the district because it has not complied with the letter and spirit of the Court's Order regarding program assessments. The sub-issues involve the following in Joshua's belief: 1) whether Mr. Heller deliberately delayed requesting an extension of time in which to comply with the Court's Order after Dr. 3 DeJ arnette made it known that the additional time was needed; 2) whether Dr. DeJ arnette' s proposed termination was retaliatory, i.e., undertaken for either or both punitive reasons and/or to discredit her when she testifies before the Court; and 3) whether the Joshua counsel and monitor acted outside the letter and the spirit of this Court's Order directing cooperation.1 The Court is being called upon to exclude the African American school board members and Dr. DeJamette as witnesses: \"that the Joshua Intervenors be prohibited from calling as witnesses at the January 20, 2007 hearing LRSD officials and personnel with whom Walker or Springer have had ex-parte communications related to LRSD's implementation of the Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy.\" page 9 (7) Joshua contends that this pleading is an effort to preclude Joshua's calling :tvrr. Heller as a witness in the forthcoming proceeding. For the disqualification of IV.Ir. Walker would effectively  moot the issue of whether Mr. Heller complied with the Court's order to cooperate with and support PRE in its implementation efforts. In the supplemental pleading before the Court, facts are urged by :tvrr. Heller which cannot be e~tablished without an evidentiary hearing because they are disputed. Much of the objection regarding attorney client privilege between Heller and DeJarnette has to be more carefully considered. At some point, Dr. Brooks became adversary to Dr. DeJarnette or at least she contends that. Did :tvrr. Heller continue to represent both of them during that adversariness. Mr. Heller also became adversary to Dr. DeJarnette because she 1 . The Order referred to by Judge Wright was entered during the midst of compliance hearings before her which had begun in July, 2001. She was concerned that while the matter was being heard by her there would not be any communication between Joshua counsel and school officials except by informing counsel in advance. That situation ended when those hearings ended. Her proposition as a general rule is understood and has been respected by counsel and Ms. Springer. 4 informed him that the district, in her opinion, was non compliant with the Court's orders. Dr. DeJamette then obtained her own counsel because she apparently was being threatened by Dr. Brooks for setting forth her honest views regarding the status of compliance in her discussions before the school administration and with ODM , Joshua and the Board. She then filed a grievance allegmg that the administration and 1'fr. Heller had taken adverse action against her due to her PRE responsibility to the Court. Undersigned counsel also came to represent Ms. Yvette Dillingham, a member of PRE, who was adversely affected by the school district's reorganization plan which took place in 2005. Did 1ifr. Heller represent her or did 1ifr. Walker represent her? Clearly, the question is not so easily to be determined. At most, it is to be said that N.fr. Heller represented Dr. Brooks and that Dr. Brooks and the Board were directly accountable to the Court. Dr. DeJamette became directly  accountable to the Court because of the specific orders of the Court. Indeed, 1ifr. Heller was also obliged to respect the Court's orders. The only \"party\" including counsel prior to the election of the two African American board members who sought to respect the orders of the Court was Dr. DeJamette. The others sought to obstruct it. . Joshua counsel should not be disqualified for bringing matters to the attention of the Court which are established by papers, public discussion, and exchanges of correspondence. Seldom is the public's legitimate business known only to a limited number of people. This is one of those cases. Clearly, the old Board was not concerned by its actions about effectively addressing the underachievement of African American students nor was LRSD counsel. Nor did LRSD counsel inform either Board of his private actions which involved his previous client, Dr. Ken James, former LRSD Superintendent of Schools and now Commissioner of Education for 5 - Arkansas, regarding negotiations to end magnet school and M to M transfer funding. - - The motion for contempt and to disqualify and its supplement to disqualify Joshua counsel should be dismissed because thereis no evidentiary basis to support either. If it is to be considered on the merits by the Court, an evidentiary hearing is respectfully requested. Isl John W. Walker John W. Walker 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 501-374-4187 (facsimile) Respectfully submitted, Isl Robert Pressman Robert Pressman 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, JVIA 02421 781-862-1955 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the 29th day of December, 2006, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to all counsel of record and mailed to the following persons: Mr. Gene Jones ODM 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 West Third Street Little Rocle, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S . District Courthouse 600 West Capitol, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Isl John W. Walker 6 ;ent 01 / 11 / 2006 at 16:54:14 - from to 5013744187 p3/3 ~ SCHEL H. F1UDr\\i\" {19?:. ; 994) ..'1 N M . .ElSEMAfl, JR., :I.A,  A .. 8UITR~. P.A. .,iRICK S. t.~ SRY, P .. \\. J~ C. CL\\RK, JR.. P.,.i,. T HOMAS?. LEGG'ETT, P.A. JOHN OEWY WA.'t:mN, P .. -\\. PAUL B. S'ENHJ\\M 111. P.A. t r\\RRY \\V. BURKS,? .. '\\. ,-\\ , WYCKLlFF NTS'BET, fR., P .. a\\.. JAMES EOW t\\RD H.'\\RRts, P .. \\. JAMES M. SIMPSON. P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON, P.A. J. SHPR'EJU) aussnr. Ill, P.A. OON . .UO H. BACON, [I.,\\. WILLIAM THOMAS 8AXTt:lt. ?,A. JOS\"E.i'H 8 . HURST. JR .. P.A. ELlZABETR ROBBEN MURRAY, P-~ CHRlSTOPRER HELLER. P.A. LAUlL-\\ ITENSt.\"EY SMini, P.A. ROBt::RTS. SHAF!l\\. P .. s\\, Wllt.lM,( ~l. GRl l-''FIS UI, P,A ~ICHAH S. ~ C ORE. P.i. WALTER M. on m. ?- \" 'K!Vl N' A. CR.ASS, P.A. WlLUAM A. WA.DDiLL.JR., P.A. SCOTT ). L,NCASTE.R. ?_'\\.. R08ERT 'B. 3EACH, JlL. P. A. J. UE 'BROWN, P.A. ).UIES C. BAKER. JR.. P.A. HARR'! A- U GHT. P .. '\\. SCOTT H. TUCKER, ? . .-\\ .. Gl1Y ALTON WADE, ?.A. PRtCE C. OAR'DNER. P .. \\ . TONl,\\ P. JOl-Jts, I' . .\\, OAVtO D. WtLSON, P.A. JEFFltEY H. MOORE, P.A. OAVTO }.(. G'RA.f, Jl .. \\ . CARL..\\ CUNN'tts SJIAlNHOU'R, P.A. JON.\\NN C. CHlLES , P.A. R. CHRlSTOPHER L.\\WSON, P,A. BITTY ). DEMORY. P . .\\. Ll'l'f-OA M. JOHNSON, P.A. JtUO:S W. S\u0026gt;.(tTH, P .. \\. CLIFFORD VI , Pt.UNKlITT, P .. '\\.. DANIEL 1... HEJ\\RlNGTON, P.A.. Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 - FRIDAY ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK ATTORNEYS AT LAW A LJMJTED LIA.BIL!TY PARTNERSHIP www.frldayflrm .com 400 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 2000 LJTTL.E ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3522 TELEPHONE 50.13762011 FAX 501,JH-2147 1  15 NORTH FUTRALL DRIVE, .SUIT'S\" 103 F.l.YETTEVILLE.. ARKAM!5.AS 72703 .. -'111 TELEPMONE 471~eos.2011 FAX  7 t-H5-Z 147 November 1, 2006 J. MICH.UL rlICJ.'..l:NS, P.A. .MAR VlN L CHlLDERS X. COLEM.\"i.N WESTBROOK, JR., P.A. ALUSON ). CORNWEil.. P.A. '-. nl.'EN OWENS SMITH, P.A. JASON'!. HENDREN, P.A. :SRUC? B. TIDW'El.L. P.A. JOSEPH P. MC-~AY. P . .\\. ,\\UXANOR..._ .-\\. lFRhK, :P .A. JAY T. TAY!.OR. P .. , . MARTIN.\\.. K.-\\.n!N, P.A. BRYAN W. DUKE JOSEPH G. ~'lCHOLS 'if.OBERT T. SMm-t R. YAN A .. BOWM..-\\.N TIMOTHY C. EZELL T. MlC'HE'LU .\\TOR. ?.A, JC-'..R.EN S. RAL11'ERT SAKAH b-l. COTTON \\.\"'RtSTEN S. ROWL\\.NOS .\\LAN G. BRYAN UNUSE.\\' MITCH..'\\M LORENCE. KHAY~AM M. :EDDlNGs_ VIA FACSILE and REGULAR lVIAIL Re: Meet and Confer Dear John: JOHN F. Pb15ER1C:1 AM.A'NOA CAPPS ROSE STI.VEN L BROOKS H. WAYNE YOUNC, JR. JAMtE HUFFMAN JONE5 iCIMBIRLY l), r o UNG JASON N, BR.o\\.MLEIT BRlAN C. SMlt'H O. b-UCH.An ~,tOYE'RS S'Ent M. HAIN'ES CRI N!.. CULLUM KRlSTOl\u0026gt;HIR B. KNOX l\u0026lt;.\\.'I'HRYN A, 11'. RKPAT'RlC..: J. ADAM W!U.S U ,U'RA J, .\\SBUl\\Y 0 1 C:OVNSlL WlLLlhM H, SUTTO N, !',.\\ , \\l.'lll..1.1\\M \\.. TERRY WtLLMM l.. P,'\\TTO~. JR. H.T. LARn.LER.E. ?.A. OSCAR E. DA\\-7 S , JR. . .?.A. CRR.lSTOPHER H.t LLER 1.lrrL'E ROCK nL rn 1.Ji'O-U06 FAX S 0 1 ,l  -!5H  bcllu ci;(c,;.nct You now have our Compliance Report and have participated in the evaluation team meetings regarding Read 180, 21st Century and A+. You also have other information and documents from PRE concerning our compliance. I will be happy to meet with you at any time to discuss any compliance concerns you may have. It will be more difficult to anange a meeting and, I believe, beyond the scope of what the Court has required of us, if you continue to insist that LRSD Board Members and PRE staff be present. Please give me a call at your converuence. CJH/bk cc: Dr. Roy Brooks Dr. Karen DeJarnette Margie Power Gene Jones Christopher Heller I PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT I -.. JOHN W. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS :tvir. Chris Heller FRIDAY ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Meet and Confer Dear Chris: - JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAw 1723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FA,'{ (501) 374-4187 Email: jphnwalkeratty@aol.com November 1, 2006 OF COUNSEL ROBERT McHENRY, P.A. DONNA J. McHENRY 8210 HENDERSON ROAD 1rrTLE ROCIC, ARl0u'ISAS 72210 PHONE: (501) 372-3425  FAX (501) 372-3428 Email: mchenryd@swbell.net PRE staff has been accessible in the past when you have not been. why don't you try to arrange a time wheri they are available and share that time with ODM. We will try to accommodate it. It would be better in the late afternoon. I am not available on the following dates: November 3, 8, 13-17, 2006. JWW:js cc: Mr. Gene Jones Ms. Margie Powell Sincerely, ls/John W: Walker PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT ;7.    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1148","title":"Little Rock School District's Revised Compliance Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2006-10-25"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District's Revised Compliance Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1148"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2006 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REVISED COMPLIANCE REPORT For its Revised Compliance Report, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This Compliance Report is filed pursuant to paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy contained in this Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion. The reason for revising the Compliance Report is to correctly reflect the fact that school portfolios, as opposed to the district portfolio, have not been implemented in LRSD. The substantive changes from the initial Compliance Report are found in paragraphs eleven through sixteen. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy. This Page 1 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 30 compliance is documented below, as well as in the eight Quarterly Updates which were filed between December 1, 2004 and September 1, 2006, the evaluations of Compass Learning, Smart/Thrive, Reading Recovery and Year-Round Education which were previously filed, and the evaluations of A+, 21 st Century Community Leaming Centers and READ 180 which are filed with this Compliance Report. 3. The progress of LRSD's efforts to comply with the requirement for an eighth step 2 program evaluation, the Pre-K Literacy evaluation, has been shown in LRSD's Quarterly Updates and status reports to the Court. The final evidence of LRSD's compliance with that requirement will be the evaluation itself, which the evaluator, Dr. Ross, expects to have completed on or before November 15, 2006. 4. LRSD will separately describe below its compliance with each of the requirements of the Compliance Remedy except those which set out the responsibilities of the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 5. The requirements of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy are: A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. These individuals must have experience in: (a) preparing and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations\nand (b) formulating a comprehensive program assessment process that can be used to determine the effectiveness of specific academic programs designed to improve the achievement of African-American Page 2 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 30 students. I expect the director of PRE to have a Ph.D.\nto have extensive experience in designing, preparing and overseeing the preparation of program evaluations\nand to have a good understanding of statistics and regression analysis. I also expect LRSD to hire experienced statisticians and the other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate a first-rate PRE Department. 6. LRSD met the requirements of paragraph A by adding to the PRE team three new professionals who have lrnowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. The qualifications of the seven people who were employed by PRE as of November 1, 2004 are shown at pages 3 through 5 of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. The resumes of PRE Director Dr. Karen DeJamette and statisticians Maurecia Malcolm Robinson, James C. Wohlleb and Dr. Ed Williams are found in Appendix A to the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This highly trained team of professionals has the qualifications required by paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 7. There have been a few changes in personnel since the first Quarterly Update, but PRE has maintained a highly trained team of professionals. Administrative Assistant Irma Shelton took medical leave in May of 2005. The Administrative Assistant position was eliminated on July 1, 2005. Testing Coordinator Yvette Dillingham left PRE in August, 2005. Dr. Ed Williams temporarily assumed her responsibilities until she was replaced in November 2005 Page 3 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 30 by Arthur Olds. Olds' resume can be found in Appendix A to the March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. As reported in the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, Olds sought reassignment to a teaching possession at Dunbar Magnet Middle School on April 14, 2006. Dr. Williams again temporarily assumed the Testing Coordinator responsibilities. LRSD posted the Testing Coordinator position in June, 2006 and interviews were scheduled for August, 2006. See September 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A new testing coordinator, Danyell Cummings was hired October 1, 2006. Her resume is attached as Exhibit A to this Compliance Report. 8. The current PRE staff has all of the qualifications listed in paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD complied with paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 9. The requirements of paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy are: B. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. It may take a decade or more for LRSD to make sufficient progress in improving the academic achievement of African-American students to justify discontinuing the need for specific  2.7 programs. For that reason, the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. Only then will I have the necessary assurance that LRSD intends to continue using that process for as long as it is needed to determine the effectiveness of the various key  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Part of LRSD's proof, at the next compliance hearing, must include evidence that it has devised and implemented a comprehensive Page 4 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 30 program assessment process, which has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. I suggest that LRSD use Dr. Ross to assist in developing this comprehensive program assessment process\nthen be sure that he approves that process before it is finalized and implemented. 10. LRSD has devised and deeply embedded a comprehensive program assessment process in accordance with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in developing the comprehensive program assessment process. By the time of the first Quarterly Update on December 1, 2004, PRE and Dr. Ross had \"developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSD's educational operations.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 6. The final draft of that process is found at Appendix B of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This final draft was furnished to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors more than a month in advance of its consideration by the LRSD Board of Directors. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process was approved by the LRSD Board on December 16, 2004. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process has become deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included Page 5 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 6 of 30 the development of a school district portfolio. As part of the process of the development and implementation of the portfolio, four PRE department members attended an institute for data analysis during the summer of 2005, and a consultant \"visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures and resources.\" Id. 12. LRSD has continued to develop the infrastructure to support its comprehensive assessment process. A district portfolio is an important part of this infrastructure. The portfolio will \"allow PRE staff as well as others to more easily analyze data and intersect various types of data sets to answer research questions about comprehensive school improvement efforts.\" December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 13. As of December 1, 2005, PRE had identified the data to be included in the district portfolio and had designed a draft district portfolio. Id. District administrators and principals were making use of the portfolio and steps were being taken \"to allow a more efficient collection of data related to educational processes.\" Id. Dr. Catterall used data from LRSD's portfolio in his step 2 evaluation of the Year-Round Education program. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 14. The development of the district portfolio is a continual process. As new data becomes available ( e.g. new test results) they are added to the data base. Page 6 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 7 of 30 The infrastructure is in place, and LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolio. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 15. During April of 2006, an expert on school portfolios provided professional development for LRSD principals, administrators, and the PRE staff regarding the creation and use of school portfolios. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD expects to begin the creation of school portfolios during the 2007-08 school year. 16. LRSD has also sought to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process by hiring a consultant, the Janis Group, to help develop a \"data warehouse.\" The Janis Group has \"expertise in storing, integrating, and efficiently accessing data.\" March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. The data warehouse will support frequent updates of the portfolio and allow timely data reports for purposes of planning, research, evaluation and developing policy. The data warehouse will allow reports to be generated by program, classroom, school, grade, or districtwide. Id. 17. There was some debate within LRSD about whether to purchase an internet-based data warehouse from a company called TetraData or to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse using the Business Objects software and the database already available to LRSD. LRSD decided, with some Page 7 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 8 of 30 dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. Business Objects is state of the art software which can be effectively used in the assessment of academic programs. The capabilities of the Business Objects data warehouse, including updating and reporting student data, are shown in the \"Business Objects Reporting Tools\" document attached as Exhibit B to this Compliance Report. 18. The process of developing school and district portfolios, and creating a data warehouse, has revealed the need for LRSD to take steps to insure that the data entered into its database is accurate. The accuracy of the data would be a concern whether the district used the Business Objects system, the TetraData system or some other software system. To improve the accuracy of data reporting within LRSD, LRSD has increased the number of \"error checking routines\" in its computer software. LRSD also has a full time training coordinator whose job it is to train school registrars and other LRSD personnel in the proper entry of student data, to work with those people to identify and correct recurring data entry errors, and to generally assure the accuracy and completeness of student data within the LRSD database. The accuracy of the data in LRSD's database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. 19. Finally, as another part of embedding the comprehensive program Page 8 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 9 of 30 assessment process, PRE has designed \"feasible, ongoing assessments of the four programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations last year.\" June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD also plans to have PRE conduct ongoing assessments of the programs currently being evaluated by Drs. Ross and Catterall. 20. LRSD has devised a comprehensive program assessment process as required by paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. That process has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum program. LRSD has complied with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. 21. The requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy are: C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. Each of these step 2 evaluations must cover one of the key  2. 7 programs, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Thus, over the course of the next two academic school years, LRSD must hire outside consultants to prepare a total of eight (8) formal step 2 evaluations of key  2. 7 programs. During the recent compliance hearing, Dr. Ross made it clear that LRSD must conduct these formal step 2 evaluations of the key  2.7 programs in order to continue to make progress in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. Again, I suggest that LRSD hire Dr. Ross -- to perform the following tasks: (1) identify the four key 2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year\nand (2) prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. If Dr. Ross cannot prepare all eight of the Page 9 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 10 of 30 step 2 evaluations, I recommend that LRSD hire someone that Dr. Ross recommends as possessing the experience and ability necessary to prepare those evaluations. 22. In accordance with paragraph C, LRSD hired Dr. Ross to \"identify the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year,\" and to \"prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible.\" 23. Dr. Ross was provided a copy of the Compliance Remedy and he endorsed the first Quarterly Update \"as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, Appendix C (p. 45). Dr. Ross assumed responsibility for preparing six of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations. Three of those cover the 2004-05 school year and were filed on February 6, 2006. Two others are for the 2005-06 school year and will be filed today. The sixth step 2 evaluation being prepared by Dr. Ross, Pre-K Literacy, has been delayed due to the unavailability of necessary data and is expected to be completed no later than November 15, 2006. 24. Two of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations were prepared by Dr. James Catterall. One covered the 2004-05 school year and was filed on Page 10 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 11 of 30 February 6, 2006. The other will be filed today. 25. PRE, in collaboration with Dr. Ross, selected Reading Recovery, Smart/Thrive, Compass Leaming and Year-Round Education to be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year. December l, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 7-9. Those evaluations have been completed. 26. Dr. Ross initially identified the following four  2.7 programs for step 2 evaluations in the 2005-06 school year: Arkansas A+ School Network\nKnowledgePoints\nPLATO Leaming and Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Development. June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. At the request of the Joshua Intervenors, and with the agreement of Dr. Ross, 21 st Century Community Leaming Centers was substituted for PLATO Leaming as the subject of an evaluation for the 2005- 06 school year. September 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4 and Appendix C, (pp. 19-21 ). KnowledgePoints was also replaced as the subject of evaluation by the READ 180 program because the supplier of KnowledgePoints withdrew its support of the program in Arkansas. December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. 27. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall possess the experience and ability necessary to prepare the eight required step 2 evaluations. Their qualifications are found in Appendix C to the first Quarterly Update (pp. 46-54). They are both familiar with the requirements of the Compliance Remedy and have agreed to Page 11 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 12 of 30 prepare their evaluations in accordance with those requirements. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. 28. The requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy are: D. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations must answer the following essential research question: \"Has the  2.7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district?\" The eight step 2 evaluations may also answer as many other research questions as the designers of each evaluation deem necessary and appropriate. Each of the step 2 evaluations must be organized and written in such a way that it can be readily understood by a lay person. I will allow the outside experts preparing each of these evaluations to decide on the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data that need to be analyzed in preparing each evaluation. PRE must: (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants hired to prepare these step 2 evaluations\nand (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support in preparing these step 2 evaluations. 29. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations answers the essential research question of whether the program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations also answers other important research questions. Each is organized and written so that its findings and recommendations can be readily understood by a lay person. In each case, the outside experts and the evaluation teams determined the evaluation design, Page 12 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 13 of 30 including the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data necessary to the utility of each evaluation. 30. PRE has overseen the preparation of all eight step 2 evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and those associated with them, to support their work and provide any and all requested assistance. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp.6-7\nMarch 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 4\nJune 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 5-6\nSeptember 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 6 and Appendix A. LRSD has substantially complied with the requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy. 31. The requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy are: E. In order to streamline LRSD's record-keeping obligation, I am going to require that each of the eight step 2 evaluations contain, in addition to the traditional information and data, a special section which: ( 1) describes the number of teachers and administrators, at the various grade levels, who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the key  2.7 program being evaluated\n(2) lists each of the recommended program modifications, if any, that were deemed necessary in order to increase the effectiveness of each of the  2. 7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (3) briefly explains how each of the recommended modifications is expected to increase the effectiveness of the  2. 7 program. This requirement is intended to relieve LRSD of any independent record-keeping obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. 32. In accordance with paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy, each of Page 13 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 14 of 30 the eight step 2 evaluations contains a section concerning data collection which describes the number of teachers and administrators at various grade levels who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the program being evaluated. Each of the eight evaluations also contains recommended program modifications and explains how the recommended modifications can be expected to increase the effectiveness of the program. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 4-5. 33. On April 18, 2006, LRSD convened the four evaluation teams which worked on the 2004-05 evaluations to consider the feasibility and the timeframe for implementing the external evaluators' recommendations. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A summary of LRSD's commitments to the modifications recommended by the external evaluators is found in Appendix A (pp. 7-11) to the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. LRSD will follow the same process of reviewing the evaluators' recommended modifications following receipt of the evaluations for the 2005-06 school year. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy. 34. The requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy are: F. As soon as PRE and Dr. Ross identify the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations, PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In Page 14 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 15 of 30 addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval. I expect the Board to approve LRSD's comprehensive program assessment process no later than December 31, 2004. 35. In accordance with paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, PRE notified ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations. See June l, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 8. PRE also provided to ODM and Joshua a final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented to the Board for approval. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 6 and 11. The LRSD Board of - Directors approved the comprehensive program assessment process on December 16, 2004, in advance of the December 31, 2004 deadline. March I, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy. 36. The requirements of paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy are: G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year. These quarterly updates must be delivered to the ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1 of each of those two academic school years. As soon as each of the eight step 2 evaluations has been completed and approved by the Board, LRSD must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua. Page 15 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 16 of 30 37. In accordance with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy, LRSD submitted quarterly written updates to the Court and delivered them to ODM and Joshua on or before December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, December 1, 2005, March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006 and September 1, 2006. Those quarterly written updates reported \"the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations\" prepared during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. The quarterly updates also provided information on the status of compliance with other components of the Compliance Remedy. - 38. As soon as the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were completed and approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD provided them to ODM and Joshua. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on October 16, 2006. The fourth will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on or before November 15, 2006. As soon as the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year are approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD will provide final copies of those evaluations to ODM and Joshua. LRSD has complied with paragraph G of Page 16 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 17 of 30 the Compliance Remedy. 39. The requirements of paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy are: J. The four step program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October l, 2005. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2006. 40. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were filed with the Court on February 6, 2006 in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005- 06 school year will be filed on today in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Dr. Ross requires additional time to complete the Pre-K - Literacy evaluation because of the delayed availability of necessary testing data. LRSD has requested an extension of time for the filing of that step 2 evaluation to and including November 15, 2006, and expects to file that evaluation by that date. LRSD has substantially complied with paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy. 41. The requirements of paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy are: K. On or before October 15, 2006, LRSD must file a Compliance Report documenting its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. If Joshua wishes to challenge LRSD's substantial compliance, they must file objections on or before November 15, 2006. Thereafter, I will schedule a compliance hearing and decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. Page 17 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 18 of 30 42. LRSD is filing this Compliance Report on October 16, 2006 in accordance with paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy and the Court's July 12, 2006 letter to the parties (docket no. 4027). WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the eight Quarterly Updates which have been filed with the Court, and on the basis of the completion of eight step 2 program evaluations by Drs. Ross and Catterall, LRSD prays for an order finding it to be in substantial compliance with the Compliance Remedy contained in the Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion, declaring LRSD to be a unitary school district, and releasing LRSD from all supervision and - monitoring by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) Khayyam M. Eddings (#02008) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 Isl Christopher Heller Page 18 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 19 of 30 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 25, 2006, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar.us sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com i ohnwalkeratty@aol .com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 /s/ Christopher Heller Page 19 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 20 of 30 -----------------~-------------- Career ObJe\\ltlve: Pro!ouionaJ Experimce: 2004-Preseot 1998-Prolont Education: May,2005 Dccombor, 1998 May, 1997 Proteulonally .Related AclJvitla: Danyell Crutchneld Cummlnt1 5 Ben HOi\u0026amp;JI Cove Llttle Rockt ArkaDSU 72210 (501) 407.8497 (501) 447-1737 To utilize proven ac\u0026amp;demic and professiODll experience to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for srowth and an opportunif)' to contribute to 1. prosroslivo cducatiooal onviron:mCllt. High Schools That Wotk Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Engliah Tc~hcr ]. A. Fair Symllll Magnet Hiib School Littlo Rock, Arlcanw 72210 Randy Rutherford, Priocip\u0026amp;I Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supetviuoo, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Maler ofBducation, Secondary EdUC\u0026amp;tio11, University of Arbmu at Little Roca: Bachelor of Arts, .English, Univerdty of Arkansas at Little ~k Actina Assistant Prinolpal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Slakcboldcr Southern Regional \u0026amp;lucation Board Literacy Team mcrnbcr Teacher of the Year Educational Spcclallst Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 21 of 30 ---- _.. -------- . .-.- ---- ----. -.- -- -------. Refueuca: Linda YO\\IJlg Gntnta Coordinator (501) 447.3372 work (501) 225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Blcmentary (501)447-4300 work (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed,D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 wod: {501) 4070817 homo Sharon Cauley, Ed.D A.5sistant Principal J.A. Fair Systems Megnot High School (S-01) 447-1700 ext. 1710 work (501)~66-6216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 22 of 30 ---- ---------------------- Career ObJe~tlve: Pr.Cealonal ~erienco: 2004-Present 1998-PRKnt Edll(:ttlon: May,2005 Dectmbor, 1998 May, 1997 Prufeulcmally Rt1atcd ActMtlu: Dallyell Crutchfield Cummlup 5 Bea Hogan Cove LUtle Rock, Arwuu 7l210 (501) 407--8097 (501) 447-1737 To utilize proven academic and professional cicpcricnce lo obcain a challenging position as 1111 administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contn'butc to a pl'OjTClsaive educational cnvlromncnt. High Schools That Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Syalcrrui Magnet Hlgb School Little ~0k. Arb.mu 72210 Randy Ruthcdord, Principal English Teacher J. A. Fair Syskins Magnet Hi\u0026amp;h School Littlo Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford. Priucipal Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supemsiotl, University of Arkansas at Little Rook Mas1CII\" ofBducatioa. S:onduy Ea.ioation, U'nivonity of Arlcaasu al Uttlc Rook Bachelor of Art\u0026amp;, English, University of Arlcansa.s at Little Rocle Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southcm Regional Bducatloo Board Ltter,cy Team rnomber Teacher of' the Year Bduoatlonal Spcclalist Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 23 of 30 __ ........ ----- llaferences: Linda Young Grants Coordinator {501) 447-3372 work {501) 22S-S439 home JmBrooks Principal David O'Dodd Elc:mcntary (,501) 447-4300 WOJX (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax. Ed,D Student Hearing (501) 4473S82 work (501)407.0817 homo Sharon Cauloy, Bd.D Aasistant Principal J.A. Falr S)'ltClllS Ma,snct High School (SOI) 44M700 \"t. 1710 work (SOI) 666-621_6 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 24 of 30 Bl Platform Little Rock School District Business Objects Reporting Tools Business Objects Enterprise is a scalable, adaptive platform that delivers insight and corporate information to all your end users. With a platform designed to help you confidently deploy and manage your Business Intelligence (BI) implementations, Business Objects provides the Little Rock School District with the extreme insight you need to extend your competitive advantage. The BI Platform provides a set of common services to simplify deployment and management ofBI tools, reports, and applications. The reporting system at the Little Rock School District includes information delivery in subject areas including Student Demographics, Student Performance, Budget and Finance, Employee Attendance, Child Nutrition, Human Resources, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Procurement, and Procurement Warehouse, to name a few. Flexible Services...Orlented Platform By building the Little Rock School District's BI solutions with Business Objects Enterprise, we have the flexibility to deploy a solution for a single infonnation chaJlenge, while being able to simultaneously expand the deployment as our needs evolve. Designed for ScalabiUty and High Performance Business Objects Enterprise is designed for scalability, reliability, fault-tolerance, extensibility, and 24n availability. This platfonn recognizes the importance of diverse global deployments, supports Unicode, and is compliant with Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, illM AfX, HP-UX, and Linux. So you can start with a single BI project on one platform, and easily grow to support an entelJ)rise-wide standardization initiative on multiple platfonns. With Bl content now being delivered via intranet and extranet, BI platform scalability ls a key issue. Business Objects Enterprise has the scalability you need to accommodate increasing numbers of users, process growing volumes of infonnation, and scale on a single machin~r clusters of machines-while maintaining high performance. Proven RellabUlty This platfonn's key attributes-performance, reliability, and scalability-are proven by extensive, real world testing and third-party certification. Enterprise is the only BI platform to achieve Microsoft Windows 2003 Datacenter certification. Business Objects Enterpris~ covered by a 24/7 technical customer support-has demonstrably installed and run on a 32processor system, remained stable through rigorous stress testing, and stayed available after being subject to extensive failover conditions. We also continually conduct extensive benchmarking and perfonnance testing to ensure our platform .,..~~cal~ c,~ 81 :-::~~m-e_e_tt h_e_n_ccd_s_o_f_th_e_Li_tt1_e_R_oc_k_S_ch_oo_l D_is_tn_c_t_to_d_a_y_an_d_t_o_m_o_rr_o_w_. __~ (. I._ _B EXHJ-BIT--\"] Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 25 of 30 Reporting Fundamentals The fundamental requirements of any reporting system are a normalized database and a reporting tool. Data from disparate systems and formats is collected in a centralized database platform and transformed into a consistent, well organized reporting database. Many reports have been created and delivered from this reporting database using Crystal Reports as the reporting tool. Normalized Data This data, securely housed at the Little Rock School District Technology Center, has been normalized to 3rd nonnal form on a Microsoft SQL Server database server. The original database management software is DB2 residing on an IBM AS/400 application server, which houses a majority of the studentbased data. Other student data resides in Microsoft Access or is provided to the CIS department via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Automated processes have been developed and scheduled to update the student data nightly, where required. Processes have also been designed and implemented to update data in key financial, human resources and accounting subject areas. Business Objects provides the industry's leading suite of integrated business intelligence products. The products are categorized into three groups: Reportln2 allows all levels of the Little Rock School District to access, format, and deliver data as meaningful infonnation to large populations of information consumers like teachers and school administrators both inside and outside the organization. This is provided through detailed reports created using Crystal Reports and accessed via a web browser using the Business Objects Enterprise Info View application-  Query aad Analysis tools allow end users to interact with District infonnation and answer ad hoc questions, without advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and structures. This is provided through a product called Web Intelligence or WEBL This allows users to create dynamic reports from their desks with little or no required knowledge of the underlying database schema. Jn-\u0026lt;iepth analysis is performed using OLAP Intelligence, a powerful OnLine Analytic Processing tool that provides detailed, fast, multidimensional data for sophisticated comparative analysis and reporting. Performance Management products help users align with strategy by tracking and analyzing key business and educational metrics and goals via management dashboards, scorecards. and alerting. This is provided through Perfozmance Manager and Dashboard Manager products that present Key Perfonnance Indicators in user-friendly, interactive graphical tools. Crystal Reports A world standard for enterprise reporting, Crystal Reports is an intuitive reporting solution that helps customers rapidly create flexible, feature-rich, high-fidelity reports and tightly integrate them into web and Windows applications. The Crystal Reports enterprise reporting solution consists of: lRSDBITooll l'c,Zo/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 26 of 30  Powerl'ul report design: Report authors can use the visual report designer (with a complete set of layout and design controls), to design highly fonnatted, interactive, and professional-looking reports. And they can design within the leading .NET and Java development tools without having to step out of their chosen development environment.  Flexi'ble application development: Developers can leverage cross-platform support for Java, .NET, and COM development technologies. HTML is generated directly by Crystal Reports, allowing developers to focus on application business logic, rather than tedious, time-intensive hand coding. Separation of application development and report design tasks allow developers to focus on application development, while the report authors can focus on report design.  Report management and delivery: Reports are easily published to the web, for better business decisions in all areas of the Little Rock School District. Reports can be exported and repurposed to the electronic fonnats used by most end users (e.g. PDF and Excel). IT can centralize the management of operational reporting while distributing the report authoring function out to departments of the District that need them. The following themes are an overview of what features are available in Crystal Reports XI:  Powerful data access and report design  Enhanced productivity and maintenance  Report management and delivery Dynamic and Cascading Prompts Report prompts can be based on dynamic values. This means that report designers no longer have to maintain static prompt value lists within individual reports. Instead, they can reuse existing prompts stored in the repository. HTML Preview The iterative report design/view process is streamlined, with a new HTML preview that allows report authors to sec how reports will look when published to the web. Editable RTF Format This new feature is ideal for report export editing. It delivers reports to end users in a new RTF format, so they can easily make their own document modifications. Report Export Configuration The report designer can save report export configuration infonnation within the report itself so that the end user forgoes the time aod trouble of reconfiguring the export each time a report is run. Dependency Checker With the new dependency checker, report authors can quickly find broken Jinks, formula errors. and dependency issues. This greatly reduces the time spent on QA. Business Views Speed Report Design and Maintenance Cycles Crystal Enterprise Business Views helps you better manage reporting across multiple data sources and applications by simplifying data access, change management, and data-level security processes. An l.RSDB/Too/1 Pq,Jo/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 27 of 30 optional service in Crystal Enterprise, Business Views allow you to integrate data from disparate sources, handle promotion/demotion between development and production environments, and control security at both the row and column level. Simplified Data Access Data access is one of the most fundamental, yet difficult aspects of designing a report. Locating the right data, joining tables appropriately, and filtering the data to focus on a specific subject area requires an indepth knowledge of the underlying data structures. The Business View Manager allows you to simplify data access for your report designers by insulating them from the raw data structures. You can build connections to multiple data sources, join tables, alias field names, create calculated fields, and then surface this simplified structure as a Business View in Crystal Enterprise. Your report designers can then connect to Crystal Enterprise and use the Business View as the basis for their report, rather than accessing the data directly and building their own queries. Business Views helps administrators pull data together from disparate sources. Data Connectiqns (created visually or with complex SQL statements) can be integrated into a Data Foundation. Once the Data Fowidation is built, Business Elements (a collection ofrelated fields from the Data Fowidation) can be created and combined into a Business View. The modular architecture of Business Views also allows you to readily re-use various components of one Business View to build other Business Views. A single, broad data foundation can serve as the basis for multiple, specialized Business Views. Used carefully, these capabilities allow you to minimize the number of changes required to introduce new data, fields, or formulas into your system. Granular Data-level Security Many reporting scenarios involve complex security requirements. Each user is entitled to see a slightly different slice of District data, based on their School, Department or level of seniority. Data in the Little Rock School District is commonly segregated by School and Teacher-based infonnation. Business Views allow teachers to view data regarding their students and prevents them form seeing data regarding students that are NOT assigned to them. Rather than creating a number of different reports to meet this need, we can create a single report and use the security features of Business Views to filter data appropriately for each user. Using the Business View Manager, you can set up row- or column-level filters and map these filters to users or user groups stored in your existing LDAP, Active Dirootory, or Windows authentication provider. This security is then consistently applied at the data level, ensuring that any report design based on a Business View will respect the underlying data security. You can then choose to schedule the report to run regularly. Or you can allow users to refresh it on demand. Regardless, Crystal Enterprise can generate a master instance of the report (with all the data included if you run the report under an administrator context) and then filter the report every time a user views it. All exporting, printing, and report modification requests will also return only the data the user is entitled to see. LRSD Bl Toob Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 28 of 30 Change Management and Re-use Maintaining a large set of reports is often more time-consuming and complex than new development. Activities such as making small changes in response to user needs, updating business calculations, changing formatting, and moving your reports between development and production data sources all delay you from addressing new requirements. Business Views includes two key features to help you spend less time on report maintenance. First, you can use Dynamic Data Connections to store connections to multiple instances of the same database (e.g., development, test, and production). By passing a parameter when you're designing (or scheduling) the report, you can select which data source the report runs against. Second, you can store commonly-used functions, text objects, and logos directly in your data fowidation. This allows you to easily roll changes across multiple reports by changing the object once. Business Objects Enterprise Info View Business Objects Info View is a completely redesigned web interface that enables user to navigate, create, and interact with District information. Integrated search and navigation tools allow users to easily find the infonnation they need. Users can also personalize their interactions to simplify consumption of District information. Info View is built to support Java and Microsoft based web servers, to easily fit within you're the Little Rock School District IT infrastructure. Web Intelligence Many organizations find it difficult to access information not contained in standard reports. And requests to IT for new infonnation simply add to the report backlog. Even when ad hoc query capabilities are available, they're typically difficult to use and don't provide your non-technical users with a simple method of exploring infonnation, to really understand the business issue at hand. With Business Objects Web Intelligence, both self-service access to information and data analysis are available in one product, helping your users turn educational analysis into effective decisions. Users can create a query from scratch, format the information retrieved, and analyze it to understand underlying trends and root causes. If the full power of query capabilities is not required, users can simply analyze information in existing reports-fonnatting and exploring them to meet specific needs. OLAP lntelllgence Businen Objects OLAP Intelligence is a powerful and easy-to-use tool that allows you to access and analyze data stored in tbe leading OLAP servers. It uniquely satisfies the analysis requirements of both information analysts (power users) and less sophisticated knowledge workers (business users). With OLAP Intelligence, power users can slice and dice, drill, rank, sort, filter, create calculations on the fly, and perfonn. speed-of-thought data exploration. And business users can interact with pre-built OLAP workbooks that contain highly intuitive, graphical views of educational activity, guided navigation and worktlows, and flexible ad hoc analysis. Its advanced analysis capabilities, shared security, acd relational drill-through allow you to standardize on Business Objects for all of your BI needs. OLAP Intelligence delivers:  Best-of-breed ad hoc OLAP  Managed OLAP authoring and distribution  Integration with the market leading, trusted BI platfonn LRSDBlTooll Pa,, S o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 29 of 30 Best-of-Breed Ad Hoc OLAP The primary driver for implementing an OLAP database is to provide users with fast access to multidimensional data. IT develops focused OLAP cubes to provide users with a structured data environment, optimized for analysis. But in order for users to take advantage of the pre-aggregated data within an OLAP cube, they require an interface that allows them to drill, slice, and dice while leveraging the response times that the predefined OLAP cube environment offers. Speed-of-Thought Analysis OLAP Intelligence provides an intuitive, web-based interface that allows users to select dimensions and members from a query panel as we11 as perfonn similar analysis from integrated Windows, Microsoft Excel, and ActiveX client interfaces. Users can interact with their data and ask spontaneous questions to uncover trends and identify anomalies. And because OLAP Intelligence takes advantage of the power of the OLAP cube, users are guaranteed speed-of-thought response time. Intuitive, Function-Rich Interface The OLAP Intelligence interface is both intuitive and function-rich. Common functions such as ranking, filtering, highlighting, quick calculations, zero suppression, and axis swapping are available with a single click of the mouse. More advanced analyses are only a few mouse clicks away and provide an uncluttered, intuitive user interface that requires minimal training. With OLAP Intelligence, users can also asymmetrically display data and hide specific dimensions that are irrelevant to data exploration. Deep, Open Access to Microsoft, Hyperion, and SAP OLAP Servers With OLAP Intelligence, you get best.of-breed, ad hoc OLAP for today's leading, multidimensional database servers-Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services, Hyperion Essbase, IBM DB2 OLAP, and SAP BW. For examplei native Hyperion Essbase 7.x support for free-fonn calculations and cube actions means that organizations are maximizing their OLAP server investments and taking advantage ofkey enhancements and optimizations. Managed OLAP Authoring and Distribution OLAP Intelligence goes further than most OLAP clients on the market today by not only providing powerful ad hoc analysis, but also delivering a flexible, managed OLAP environment. With OLAP Intelligence, you can easily create sophisticated workbooks that exploit the power of the underlying OLAP server, and enable users to build in predefined navigation paths and workflows. Then you can securely deploy and deliver the workbooks live to business users who don't necessarily fit the powerdata analyst profile. These OLAP workbooks may contain custom buttons and multi-page reports that recipients can view and interact with over the web. Publish Live OLAP Workbooks to Business Users When users view an OLAP Intelligence workbook over the web, it may appear as a dashboard with custom .functionality specific to one area of the business, or as an ad hoc interface that allows them to perform advanced analysis. Because OLAP Intelligence has a flexible design and was created to meet powerful ad hoc and managed anaJysis needs, the deployment possibilities are limitless. Built-In Guided Navigation and Data Exploration UISD Bl Tooh Pq,60/1 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 30 of 30 With OLAP Intelligence you can guide users through the OLAP data navigation and exploration process. For example, a user can highlight a group of cells in a report, click a custom analysis button, and view a new graph that has drilled down on the chosen group, displaying variances as a worksheet and chart. A show trend analysis button could then be made available that displays a new page in the workbook with a year-over-year comparison. Open drill-through capabilities in OLAP Intelligence empower users to drill .from aggregated OLAP data down to relational details. This means that users can navigate and explore summarized information, and drill through and pass context to more detailed Crystal Reports or Business Objects Web Intelligence documents. This contextual drill-through technology provides users with intelligent navigation without the need to understand the complexities of Wlderlying data and metadata structures. LRSDB/Toob Pqlo/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT coUR-rRECEIVED EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OCT 1 7 2006 OFFICE OF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S COMPLIANCE REPORT For its Compliance Report, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This Compliance Report is filed pursuant to paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy contained in this Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy. This compliance is documented below, as well as in the eight Quarterly Updates which were filed between December 1, 2004 and September 1, 2006, the evaluations of Compass Learning, Smart/Thrive, Reading Recovery and Year-Round Education which were previously filed, and the evaluations of A+, 21st Century Community Page 1 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 30 Learning Centers and READ 180 which are filed with this Compliance Report. 3. The progress ofLRSD's efforts to comply with the requirement for an eighth step 2 program evaluation, the Pre-K Literacy evaluation, has been shown in LRSD's Quarterly Updates and status reports to the Court. The final evidence of LRSD's compliance with that requirement will be the evaluation itself, which the evaluator, Dr. Ross, expects to have completed on or before November 15, 2006. 4. LRSD will separately describe below its compliance with each of the requirements of the Compliance Remedy except those which set out the responsibilities of the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 5. The requirements of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy are: A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. These individuals must have experience in: (a) preparing and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations\nand (b) formulating a comprehensive program assessment process that can be used to determine the effectiveness of specific academic programs designed to improve the achievement of African-American students. I expect the director of PRE to have a Ph.D.\nto have extensive experience in designing, preparing and overseeing the preparation of program evaluations\nand to have a good understanding of statistics and regression analysis. I also expect LRSD to hire experienced statisticians and the other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate a first-rate PRE Department. Page 2 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 3 of 30 6. LRSD met the requirements of paragraph A by adding to the PRE team three new professionals who have knowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. The qualifications of the seven people who were employed by PRE as of November 1, 2004 are shown at pages 3 through 5 of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. The resumes of PRE Director Dr. Karen DeJarnette and statisticians Maurecia Malcolm Robinson, James C. Wohlleb and Dr. Ed Williams are found in Appendix A to the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This highly trained team of professionals has the qualifications required by paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 7. There have been a few changes in personnel since the first Quarterly - Update, but PRE has maintained a highly trained team of professionals. Administrative Assistant Irma Shelton took medical leave in May of 2005. The Administrative Assistant position was eliminated on July 1, 2005. Testing Coordinator Yvette Dillingham left PRE in August, 2005. Dr. Ed Williams temporarily assumed her responsibilities until she was replaced in November 2005 by Arthur Olds. Olds' resume can be found in Appendix A to the March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. As reported in the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, Olds sought reassignment to a teaching possession at Dunbar Magnet Middle School on April 14, 2006. Dr. Williams again temporarily assumed the Testing Coordinator Page 3 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 4 of 30 - responsibilities. LRSD posted the Testing Coordinator position in June, 2006 and interviews were scheduled for August, 2006. See September 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A new testing coordinator, Danyell Cummings was hired October 1, 2006. Her resume is attached as Exhibit A to this Compliance Report. 8. The current PRE staff has all of the qualifications listed in paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD complied with paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 9. The requirements of paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy are: B. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. It may take a decade or more for LRSD to make sufficient progress in improving the academic achievement of African-American students to justify discontinuing the need for specific  2.7 programs. For that reason, the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD' s curriculum and instruction program. Only then will I have the necessary assurance that LRSD intends to continue using that process for as long as it is needed to determine the effectiveness of the various key  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Part of LRSD's proof, at the next compliance hearing, must include evidence that it has devised and implemented a comprehensive program assessment process, which has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. I suggest that LRSD use Dr. Ross to assist in developing this comprehensive program assessment process\nthen be sure that he approves that process before it is finalized and implemented. 10. LRSD has devised and deeply embedded a comprehensive program Page 4 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 5 of 30 - assessment process in accordance with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in developing the comprehensive program assessment process. By the time of the first Quarterly Update on December 1, 2004, PRE and Dr. Ross had \"developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSD's educational operations.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 6. The final draft of that process is found at Appendix B of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This final draft was furnished to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors more than a month in advance of its consideration by the LRSD Board of Directors. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 11. The comprehensive program - assessment process was approved by the LRSD Board on December 16, 2004. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process has become deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included the development of school portfolios. \"School portfolios assemble comprehensive data about classrooms, schools, and districts from disparate sources into data bases that are accessible and informative particularly to teachers and administrators as well as to board members, parents, and other stakeholders.\" September 1, 2005 Page 5 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 6 of 30 Quarterly Update, p. 3. School portfolios are useful for formative evaluations of student achievement and educational programs. LRSD began implementing school portfolios during the 2005-06 school year. Id. As part of the process of the development and implementation of portfolios, four PRE department members attended an institute for data analysis during the summer of 2005, and a consultant \"visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures and resources.\" Id. 12. LRSD has continued to develop the infrastructure to support its comprehensive assessment process. School and district data portfolios are an important part of this infrastructure. These portfolios \"allow PRE staff as well as others to more easily analyze data and intersect various types of data sets to answer - research questions about comprehensive school improvement efforts.\" December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. During April of 2006, an expert on school portfolios provided professional development for LRSD principals, administrators, and the PRE staff regarding the creation and use of school portfolios. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 13. As of December 1, 2005, PRE had identified the data to be included in the district portfolio and had designed a draft district portfolio. Id. District administrators and principals were making use of the portfolio and steps were being taken \"to allow a more efficient collection of data related to educational Page 6 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 7 of 30 processes.\" Id. Dr. Catterall used data from LRSD's portfolio in his step 2 evaluation of the Year-Round Education program. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 14. The development of portfolios is a continual process. As new data becomes available (e.g. new test results) they are added to the data base. The infrastructure is in place, and LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolios. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 15. LRSD has also sought to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process by hiring a consultant, the Janis Group, to help develop a \"data warehouse.\" The Janis Group has \"expertise in storing, integrating, and efficiently - accessing data.\" March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. The data warehouse will support frequent updates of the portfolio and allow timely data reports for purposes of planning, research, evaluation and developing policy. Reports can be generated by program, classroom, school, grade, or district-wide. Id. 16. There was some debate within LRSD about whether to purchase an internet-based data warehouse from a company called TetraData or to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse using the Business Objects software and the database already available to LRSD. LRSD decided, with some dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. Page 7 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 8 of 30 - Business Objects is state of the art software which can be effectively used in the assessment of academic programs. The capabilities of the Business Objects data warehouse, including updating and reporting student data, are shown in the \"Business Objects Reporting Tools\" document attached as Exhibit B to this Compliance Report. 17. The process of developing school and district portfolios, and creating a data warehouse, has revealed the need for LRSD to take steps to insure that the data entered into its database is accurate. The accuracy of the data would be a concern whether the district used the Business Objects system, the TetraData system or some other software system. To improve the accuracy of data reporting within LRSD, LRSD has increased the number of \"error checking routines\" in its computer software. LRSD also has a full time training coordinator whose job it is to train school registrars and other LRSD personnel in the proper entry of student data, to work with those people to identify and correct recurring data entry errors, and to generally assure the accuracy and completeness of student data within the LRSD database. The accuracy of the data in LRSD's database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. 18. Finally, as another part of embedding the comprehensive program assessment process, PRE has designed \"feasible, ongoing assessments of the four Page 8 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 9 of 30 - programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations last year.\" June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD also plans to have PRE conduct ongoing assessments of the programs currently being evaluated by Drs. Ross and Catterall. 19. LRSD has devised a comprehensive program assessment process as required by paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. That process has been deeply embedded as a permanent part ofLRSD's curriculum program. LRSD has complied with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. 20. The requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy are: C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four ( 4) fonnal step 2 evaluations. Each of these step 2 evaluations must cover one of the key  2. 7 programs, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Thus, over the course of the next two academic school years, LRSD must hire outside consultants to prepare a total of eight (8) formal step 2 evaluations of key  2.7 programs. During the recent compliance hearing, Dr. Ross made it clear that LRSD must conduct these formal step 2 evaluations of the key  2.7 programs in order to continue to make progress in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. Again, I suggest that LRSD hire Dr. Ross -- to perform the following tasks: (1) identify the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key 2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year\nand (2) prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. If Dr. Ross cannot prepare all eight of the step 2 evaluations, I recommend that LRSD hire someone that Dr. Ross recommends as possessing the experience and ability necessary Page 9 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 0 of 30 - to prepare those evaluations. 21 . In accordance with paragraph C, LRSD hired Dr. Ross to \"identify the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year,\" and to \"prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible.\" 22. Dr. Ross was provided a copy of the Compliance Remedy and he endorsed the first Quarterly Update \"as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, Appendix C (p. 45). Dr. Ross assumed responsibility for preparing six of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations. Three of those cover the 2004-05 school year and were filed on February 6, 2006. Two others are for the 2005-06 school year and will be filed today. The sixth step 2 evaluation being prepared by Dr. Ross, Pre-K Literacy, has been delayed due to the unavailability of necessary data and is expected to be completed no later than November 15, 2006. 23. Two of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations were prepared by Dr. James Catterall. One covered the 2004-05 school year and was filed on February 6, 2006. The other will be filed today. Page 10 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 11 of 30 24. PRE, in collaboration with Dr. Ross, selected Reading Recovery, Smart/Thrive, Compass Leaming and Year-Round Education to be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 7-9. Those evaluations have been completed. 25. Dr. Ross initially identified the following four 2.7 programs for step 2 evaluations in the 2005-06 school year: Arkansas A+ School Network\nKnowledgePoints\nPLATO Leaming and Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Development. June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. At the request of the Joshua Intervenors, and with the agreement of Dr. Ross, 21 st Century Community Leaming Centers was substituted for PLATO Leaming as the subject of an evaluation for the 2005- - 06 school year. September 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4 and Appendix C, (pp. 19-21). KnowledgePoints was also replaced as the subject of evaluation by the READ 180 program because the supplier of KnowledgePoints withdrew its support of the program in Arkansas. December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. 26. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall possess the experience and ability necessary to prepare the eight required step 2 evaluations. Their qualifications are found in Appendix C to the first Quarterly Update (pp. 46-54). They are both familiar with the requirements of the Compliance Remedy and have agreed to prepare their evaluations in accordance with those requirements. LRSD has Page 11 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 12 of 30 - complied with the requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. 27. The requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy are: D. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations must answer the following essential research question: \"Has the  2.7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district?\" The eight step 2 evaluations may also answer as many other research questions as the designers of each evaluation deem necessary and appropriate. Each of the step 2 evaluations must be organized and written in such a way that it can be readily understood by a lay person. I will allow the outside experts preparing each of these evaluations to decide on the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data that need to be analyzed in preparing each evaluation. PRE must: ( 1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants hired to prepare these step 2 evaluations\nand (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support in preparing these step 2 evaluations. 28. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations answers the essential research question of whether the program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations also answers other important research questions. Each is organized and written so that it can be readily understood by a lay person. In each case, the outside experts and the evaluation teams determined the evaluation design, including the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data necessary to the utility of each Page 12 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 13 of 30 - evaluation. 29. PRE has overseen the preparation of all eight step 2 evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and those associated with them, to support their work and provide any and all requested assistance. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp.6-7\nMarch 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 4\nJune 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 5-6\nSeptember 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 6 and Appendix A. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy. 30. The requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy are: E. In order to streamline LRSD's record-keeping obligation, I am going to require that each of the eight step 2 evaluations contain, in addition to the traditional information and data, a special section which: (1) describes the number of teachers and administrators, at the various grade levels, who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the key  2.7 program being evaluated\n(2) lists each of the recommended program modifications, if any, that were deemed necessary in order to increase the effectiveness of each of the  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (3) briefly explains how each of the recommended modifications is expected to increase the effectiveness of the  2.7 program. This requirement is intended to relieve LRSD of any independent record-keeping obligations under  2.7.l of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. 31. In accordance with paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy, each of the eight step 2 evaluations contains a section concerning data collection which Page 13 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 14 of 30 - describes the number of teachers and administrators at various grade levels who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the program being evaluated. Each of the eight evaluations also contains recommended program modifications and explains how the recommended modifications can be expected to increase the effectiveness of the program. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 4-5. 32. On April 18, 2006, LRSD convened the four evaluation teams which worked on the 2004-05 evaluations to consider the feasibility and the timeframe for implementing the external evaluators' recommendations. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A summary of LRSD's commitments to the modifications recommended by the external evaluators is found in Appendix A (pp. 7-11) to the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. LRSD will follow the same process of reviewing the evaluators' recommended modifications following receipt of the evaluations for the 2005-06 school year. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy. 33. The requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy are: F. As soon as PRE and Dr. Ross identify the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations, PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must Page 14 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 15 of 30 provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval. I expect the Board to approve LRSD's comprehensive program assessment process no later than December 31, 2004. 34. In accordance with paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, PRE notified ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update\np. 8. PRE also provided to ODM and Joshua a final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented to the Board for approval. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 6 and 11. The LRSD Board of Directors approved the comprehensive program assessment process on December 16, 2004, in advance of the December 31, 2004 deadline. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy. 35. The requirements of paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy are: G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year. These quarterly updates must be delivered to the ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1 of each of those two academic school years. As soon as each of the eight step 2 evaluations has been completed and approved by the Board, LRSD must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua. 36. In accordance with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy, Page 15 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 16 of 30 LRSD submitted quarterly written updates to the Court and delivered them to ODM and Joshua on or before December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, December 1, 2005, March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006 and September 1, 2006. Those quarterly written updates reported \"the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations\" prepared during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. The quarterly updates also provided information on the status of compliance with other components of the Compliance Remedy. 36. As soon as the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were completed and approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD provided them to ODM and Joshua. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on October 16, 2006. The fourth will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on or before November 15, 2006. As soon as the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year are approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD will provide final copies of those evaluations to ODM and Joshua. LRSD has complied with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy. 37. The requirements of paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy are: Page 16 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 17 of 30 J. The four step program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2005. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2006. 38. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were filed with the Court on February 6, 2006 in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005- 06 school year will be filed on today in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Dr. Ross requires additional time to complete the Pre-K Literacy evaluation because of the delayed availability of necessary testing data. LRSD has requested an extension of time for the filing of that step 2 evaluation to and including November 15, 2006, and expects to file that evaluation by that date. LRSD has substantially complied with paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy. 39. The requirements of paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy are: K. On or before October 15, 2006, LRSD must file a Compliance Report documenting its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. If Joshua wishes to challenge LRSD's substantial compliance, they must file objections on or before November 15, 2006. Thereafter, I will schedule a compliance hearing and decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. 40. LRSD is filing this Compliance Report on October 16, 2006 in accordance with paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy and the Court's July 12, Page 17 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 18 of 30 2006 letter to the parties ( docket no. 4027). WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the eight Quarterly Updates which have been filed with the Court, and on the basis of the completion of eight step 2 program evaluations by Drs. Ross and Catterall, LRSD prays for an order finding it to be in substantial compliance with the Compliance Remedy contained in the Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion, declaring LRSD to be a unitary school district, and releasing LRSD from all supervision and monitoring by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) Khayyam M. Eddings (#02008) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 /s/ Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 16, 2006, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: Page 18 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 19 of 30 mark.hagemeier(@.ag.state.ar.us sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 /s/ Christopher Heller Page 19 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 . P~e 20 of _ 30 .. Career Objective: Prefe1sional Experience: 2004-Present 1998-Present Education: May,2005 December, 1998 May, 1997 ProfessJonaJly Related Activities: DanyeJI Crutchfield Cummlnp S Ben Hogan Cove Little Rocle, Arkansas 72210 (501) 407-8097 (501) 447-1737 To utilize proven academic and professional experience to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contribute to a progressive educational environment. High Schools That Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal English Teacher J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little R(ick, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher oflhe Year Educational Specialist Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 References: Linda Young Grants Coordinator (501) 447-3372 work (501) 225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501) 447-4300 work (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 work (501) 407-0817 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.D Assistant Principal J.A. Fair Systems Magnet High School (501) 447-1700 ext. 1710 work (501) 666-6216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 22 of 30 ---------- .. ---------- .. - - - Career Objective: Profeaional Experience: 2004-Present 1998-Prescnt Education: May,2005 December, 1998 May, 1997 Professionally Related Activities: Danyell Crutchfield Cumminp S Ben Hogan Cove Little Rocle, Arkan11u 72210 (!01) 407-8097 (S0l) 447-1737 To utilize proven academic and professional ~eriencc to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opporhmity to contribute to a progressive educational environment. High Schools That Work Coordinator ]. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal English Teacher J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher of the Year Educational Specialist References: Linda Young Grants Coordinator (501) 447-3372 work (501) 225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501) 447-4300 WOJX (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 work (SOl) 407-08l7 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.D Assistant Principal ].A. Fair Systems Magnet High School (501)447-1700ext. 1710 work {501) 666-6216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 24 of 30 Bl Platform Little Rock School District Business Objects Reporting Tools Business Objects Enterprise is a scalable, adaptive platform that delivers insight and corporate infonnation to all your end users. With a platform designed to help you confidently deploy and manage your Business Intelligence (BI) implementations, Business Objects provides the Little Rock School District with the extreme insight you need to extend your competitive advantage. The BI Platform provides a set of common services to simplify deployment and management of BI tools, reports, and applications. The reporting system at the Little Rock School District includes information delivery in subject areas including Student Demographics, Student Performance, Budget and Finance, Employee Attendance, Child Nutrition, Human Resources, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Procurement, and Procurement Warehouse, to name a few. Flexible Services-Oriented Platform By building the Little Rock School District's BI solutions with Business Objects Enterprise, we have the flexibility to deploy a solution for a single information challenge, while being able to simultaneously expand the deployment as our needs evolve. Designed for Scalabilitv and High Performance Business Objects Enterprise is designed for scalability, reliability, fault-tolerance, extensibility, and 24/7 availability. This platform recognizes the importance of diverse global deployments, supports Unicode, and is compliant with Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, HP-UX, and Linux. So you can start with a single BI project on one platform, and easily grow to support an enterprise-wide standardization initiative on multiple platforms. With BI content now being delivered via intranet and extranet, BI platform scalability is a key issue. Business Objects Enterprise has the scalability you need to accommodate increasing numbers of users, process growing volumes of information, and scale on a single machine-or clusters of machineswhile maintaining high performance. Proven Reliability This platform's key attributes-performance, reliability, and scalability-are proven by extensive, real-world testing and third-party certification. Enterprise is the only BI platform to achieve Microsoft Windows 2003 Datacenter certification. Business Objects Enterprise- covered by a 24/7 technical customer support-has demonstrably installed and run on a 32-processor system, remained stable through rigorous stress testing, and stayed available after being subject to extensive failover conditions. We also continually conduct extensive benchmarking and performance testing to ensure our platform -sc-a-le_s_t_o_m_e_e_t_th_e_n__eed_ s - of_t_h_e_L-itt_l_e_R_o_c_k_S_c_h_oo_l_D_i_s_tn-c_t-to_d_a_y_an_d-to_m_o_rr_o_w_. ---l. .i _ _'B _H.IBIT--J LRSD BI Tools .., ~ ., Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 25 of 30 Reporting Fundamentals The fundamental requirements of any reporting system are a nonnalized database and a reporting tool. Data from disparate systems and formats is collected in a centralized database platform and transformed into a consistent, well organized reporting database. Many reports have been created and delivered from this reporting database using Crystal Reports as the reporting tool. Normalized Data This data, securely housed at the Little Rock School District Technology Center, has been nonnalized to 3rd normal form on a Microsoft SQL Server database server. The original database management software is DB2 residing on an IBM AS/400 application server, whkh houses a majority of the studentbased data. Other student data resides in Microsoft Access or is provided to the CIS department via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Automated processes have been developed and scheduled to update the student data nightly, where required. Processes have also been designed and implemented to update data in key financial, human resources and accounting subject areas. Business Objects provides the industry's leading suite of integrated business intelligence products. The products are categorized into three groups: Reporting allows all levels of the Little Rock School District to access, format, and deliver data as meaningful information to large populations of information consumers like teachers and school administrators both inside and outside the organization. This is provided through detailed reports created using Crystal Reports and accessed via a web browser using the Business Objects Enterprise Info View application. Query and Analysis tools allow end users to interact with District information and answer ad hoc questions, without advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and structures. This is provided through a product called Web Intelligence or WEBI. This allows users to create dynamic reports from their desks with little or no required knowledge of the underlying database schema. In-depth analysis is performed using OLAP Intelligence, a powerful OnLine Analytic Processing tool that provides detailed, fast, multidimensional data for sophisticated comparative analysis and reporting. Performance Management products help users align with strategy by tracking and analyzing key business and educational metrics and goals via management dashboards, scorecards, and alerting. This is provided through Performance Manager and Dashboard Manager products that present Key Performance Indicators in user-friendly, interactive graphical tools. Crystal Reports A world standard for enterprise reporting, Crystal Reports is an intuitive reporting solution that helps customers rapidly create flexible, feature-rich, high-fidelity reports and tightly integrate them into web and Windows applications. The Crystal Reports enterprise reporting solution consists of: LRSD Bl Tools Pagel o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 26 of 30  Powerful report design: Report authors can use the visual report designer (with a complete set of layout and design controls), to design highly formatted, interactive, and professional-looking reports. And they can design within the leading .NET and Java development tools without having to step out of their chosen development environment.  Flexible application development: Developers can leverage cross-platform support for Java, .NET, and COM development technologies. HTML is generated directly by Crystal Reports, allowing developers to focus on application business logic, rather than tedious, time-intensive hand coding. Separation of application development and report design tasks allow developers to focus on application development, while the report authors can focus on report design.  Report management and delivery: Reports are easily published to the web, for better business decisions in all areas of the Little Rock School District. Reports can be exported and repurposed to the electronic formats used by most end users (e.g. PDF and Excel). IT can centralize the management of operational reporting while distributing the report authoring function out to departments of the District that need them. The following themes are an overview of what features are available in Crystal Reports XI:  Powerful data access and report design  Enhanced productivity and maintenance  Report management and delivery Dynamic and Cascading\nPrompts Report prompts can be based on dynamic values. This means that report designers no longer have to maintain static prompt value lists within individual reports. Instead, they can reuse existing prompts stored in the repository. HTML Preview The iterative report design/view process is streamlined, with a new HTML preview that allows report authors to see how reports will look when published to the web. Editable RTF Format This new feature is ideal for report export editing. It delivers reports to end users in a new RTF format, so they can easily make their own document modifications. Report Export Config\nuration The report designer can save report export configuration information within the report itself so that the end user forgoes the time and trouble of reconfiguring the export each time a report is run. Dependencv Checker With the new dependency checker, report authors can quickly find broken links, formula errors, and dependency issues. This greatly reduces the time spent on QA. Business Views Speed Report Desig\nn and Maintenance Cycles Crystal Enterprise Business Views helps you better manage reporting across multiple data sources and applications by simplifying data access, change management, and data-level security processes. An LRSD Bl Tools Page 3 of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 27 of 30 optional service in Crystal Enterprise, Business Views allow you to integrate data from disparate sources, handle promotion/demotion between development and production environments, and control security at both the row and column level. Simplified Data Access Data access is one of the most fundamental, yet difficult aspects of designing a report. Locating the right data, joining tables appropriately, and filtering the data to focus on a specific subject area requires an indepth knowledge of the underlying data structures. The Business View Manager allows you to simplify data access for your report designers by insulating them from the raw data structures. You can build connections to multiple data sources, join tables, alias field names, create calculated fields, and then surface this simplified structure as a Business View in Crystal Enterprise. Your report designers can then connect to Crystal Enterprise and use the Business View as the basis for their report, rather than accessing the data directly and building their own queries. Business Views helps administrators pull data together from disparate sources. Data Connections (created visually or with complex SQL statements) can be integrated into a Data Foundation. Once the Data Foundation is built, Business Elements (a collection ofrelated fields from the Data Foundation) can be created and combined into a Business View. The modular architecture of Business Views also allows you to readily re-use various components of one Business View to build other Business Views. A single, broad data foundation can serve as the basis for multiple, specialized Business Views. Used carefully, these capabilities allow you to minimize the number of changes required to introduce new data, fields, or formulas into your system. Granular Data-level Securitv Many reporting scenarios involve complex security requirements. Each user is entitled to see a slightly different slice of District data, based on their School, Department or level of seniority. Data in the Little Rock School District is commonly segregated by School and Teacher-based information. Business Views allow teachers to view data regarding their students and prevents them form seeing data regarding students that are NOT assigned to them. Rather than creating a number of different reports to meet this need, we can create a single report and use the security features of Business Views to filter data appropriately for each user. Using the Business View Manager, you can set up row- or column-level filters and map these filters to users or user groups stored in your existing LDAP, Active Directory, or Windows authentication provider. This security is then consistently applied at the data level, ensuring that any report design based on a Business View will respect the underlying data security. You can then choose to schedule the report to run regularly. Or you can allow users to refresh it on demand. Regardless, Crystal Enterprise can generate a master instance of the report (with all the data included if you run the report under an administrator context) and then filter the report every time a user views it. All exporting, printing, and report modification requests will also return only the data the user is entitled to see. LRSD Bl Tools Page 4 of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 28 of 30 Change Management and Re-use Maintaining a large set ofreports is often more time-consuming and complex than new development. Activities such as making small changes in response to user needs, updating business calculations, changing formatting, and moving your reports between development and production data sources all delay you from addressing new requirements. Business Views includes two key features to help you spend less time on report maintenance. First, you can use Dynamic Data Connections to store connections to multiple instances of the same database (e.g., development, test, and production). By passing a parameter when you're designing (or scheduling) the report, you can select which data source the report runs against. Second, you can store commonly-used functions, text objects, and logos directly in your data foundation. This aliows you to easily ro11 changes across multiple reports by changing the object once. Business Objects Enterprise Info View Business Objects Info View is a completely redesigned web interface that enables user to navigate, create, and interact with District information. Integrated search and navigation tools allow users to easily find the information they need. Users can also personalize their interactions to simplify consumption of District information. Info View is built to support Java and Microsoft based web servers, to easily fit within you're the Little Rock School District IT infrastructure. Web Intelligence Many organizations find it difficult to access information not contained in standard reports. And requests to IT for new information simply add to the report backlog. Even when ad hoc query capabilities are available, they're typically difficult to use and don't provide your non-technical users with a simple method of exploring information, to really understand the business issue at hand. With Business Objects Web Intelligence, both self-service access to information and data analysis are available in one product, helping your users turn educational analysis into effective decisions. Users can create a query from scratch, format the information retrieved, and analyze it to understand underlying trends and root causes. If the full power of query capabilities is not required, users can simply analyze information in existing reports-formatting and exploring them to meet specific needs. OLAP Intelligence Business Objects OLAP Intelligence is a powerful and easy-to-use tool that allows you to access and analyze data stored in the leading OLAP servers. It uniquely satisfies the analysis requirements of both information analysts (power users) and less sophisticated knowledge workers (business users). With OLAP Intelligence, power users can slice and dice, drill, rank, sort, filter, create calculations on the fly, and perform speed-of-thought data exploration. And business users can interact with pre-built OLAP workbooks that contain highly intuitive, graphical views of educational activity, guided navigation and workflows, and flexible ad hoc analysis. Its advanced analysis capabilities, shared security, and relational drill-through allow you to standardize on Business Objects for all of your BI needs. OLAP Intelligence delivers:  Best-of-breed ad hoc OLAP  Managed OLAP authoring and distribution  Integration with the market leading, trusted BI platform LRSD Bl Tools Page5 of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 29 of 30 Best-of-Breed Ad Hoc OLAP The primary driver for implementing an OLAP database is to provide users with fast access to multidimensional data. IT develops focused OLAP cubes to provide users with a structured data environment, optimized for analysis. But in order for users to talce advantage of the pre-aggregated data within an OLAP cube, they require an interface that allows them to drill, slice, and dice while leveraging the response times that the predefined OLAP cube environment offers. Speed-of-Thought Analysis OLAP Intelligence provides an intuitive, web-based interface that allows users to select dimensions and members from a query panel as well as perform similar analysis from integrated Windows, Microsoft Excel, and ActiveX client interfaces. Users can interact with their data and ask sp,mtaneous questions to uncover trends and identify anomalies. And because OLAP Intelligence talces advantage of the power of the OLAP cube, users are guaranteed speed-of-thought response time. Intuitive, Function-Rich Interface The OLAP Intelligence interface is both intuitive and function-rich. Common functions such as ranking, filtering, highlighting, quick calculations, zero suppression, and axis swapping are available with a single click of the mouse. More advanced analyses are only a few mouse clicks away and provide an uncluttered, intuitive user interface that requires minimal training. With OLAP Intelligence, users can also asymmetrically display data and hide specific dimensions that are irrelevant to data exploration. Deep, Open Access to Microsoft, Hyperion, and SAP OLAP Servers With OLAP Intelligence, you get best-of-breed, ad hoc OLAP for today's leading, multidimensional database servers-Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services, Hyperion Essbase, IBM DB2 OLAP, and SAP BW. For example, native Hyperion Essbase 7.x support for free-form calculations and cube actions means that organizations are maximizing their OLAP server investments and taking advantage of key enhancements and optimizations. Managed OLAP Authoring and Distribution OLAP Intelligence goes further than most OLAP clients on the market today by not only providing powerful ad hoc analysis, but also delivering a flexible, managed OLAP environment. With OLAP Intelligence, you can easily create sophisticated workbooks that exploit the power of the underlying OLAP server, and enable users to build in predefined navigation paths and workflows. Then you can securely deploy and deliver the workbooks live to business users who don't necessarily fit the powerdata analyst profile. These OLAP workbooks may contain custom buttons and multi-page reports that recipients can view and interact with over the web. Publish Live OLAP Workbooks to Business Users When users view an OLAF Intelligence workbook over the web, it may appear as a dashboard with custom functionality specific to one area of the business, or as an ad hoc interface that allows them to perform advanced analysis. Because OLAP Intelligence has a flexible design and was created to meet powerful ad hoc and managed analysis needs, the deployment possibilities are limitless. Built-In Guided Navigation and Data Exploration LRSD Bl Tocls Page 6 o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 30 of 30 With OLAP Intelligence you can guide users through the OLAP data navigation and exploration process. For example, a user can highlight a group of cells in a report, click a custom analysis button, and view a new graph that has drilled down on the chosen group, displaying variances as a worksheet and chart. A show trend analysis button could then be made available that displays a new page in the workbook with a year-over-year comparison. Open drill-through capabilities in OLAP Intelligence empower users to drill from aggregated OLAP data down to relational details. This means that users can navigate and explore summarized infonnation, and drill through and pass context to more detailed Crystal Reports or Business Objects Web Intelligence documents. This contextual drill-through technology provides users with intelligent navigation without the need to understand the complexities of underlying data and metadata structures. LRSD 81 Tools Page 7 o/7\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1208","title":"Little Rock School District's Compliance Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2006-10-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District's Compliance Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1208"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCase 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT coUR-rRECEIVED EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OCT 1 7 2006 OFFICE OF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S COMPLIANCE REPORT For its Compliance Report, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This Compliance Report is filed pursuant to paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy contained in this Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy. This compliance is documented below, as well as in the eight Quarterly Updates which were filed between December 1, 2004 and September 1, 2006, the evaluations of Compass Learning, Smart/Thrive, Reading Recovery and Year-Round Education which were previously filed, and the evaluations of A+, 21 st Century Community Page 1 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 30 - Learning Centers and READ 180 which are filed with this Compliance Report. 3. The progress ofLRSD's efforts to comply with the requirement for an eighth step 2 program evaluation, the Pre-K Literacy evaluation, has been shown in LRSD's Quarterly Updates and status reports to the Court. The final evidence of LRSD's compliance with that requirement will be the evaluation itself, which the evaluator, Dr. Ross, expects to have completed on or before November 15, 2006. 4. LRSD will separately describe below its compliance with each of the requirements of the Compliance Remedy except those which set out the responsibilities of the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 5. The requirements of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy are: A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. These individuals must have experience in: (a) preparing and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations\nand (b) formulating a comprehensive program assessment process that can be used to determine the effectiveness of specific academic programs designed to improve the achievement of African-American students. I expect the director of PRE to have a Ph.D.\nto have extensive experience in designing, preparing and overseeing the preparation of program evaluations\nand to have a good understanding of statistics and regression analysis. I also expect LRSD to hire experienced statisticians and the other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate a first-rate PRE Department. Page 2 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 3 of 30 6. LRSD met the requirements of paragraph A by adding to the PRE team three new professionals who have knowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. The qualifications of the seven people who were employed by PRE as of November 1, 2004 are shown at pages 3 through 5 of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. The resumes of PRE Director Dr. Karen DeJarnette and statisticians Maurecia Malcolm Robinson, James C. Wohlleb and Dr. Ed Williams are found in Appendix A to the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This highly trained team of professionals has the qualifications required by paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 7. There have been a few changes in personnel since the first Quarterly - Update, but PRE has maintained a highly trained team of professionals. Administrative Assistant Irma Shelton took medical leave in May of 2005. The Administrative Assistant position was eliminated on July 1, 2005. Testing Coordinator Yvette Dillingham left PRE in August, 2005. Dr. Ed Williams temporarily assumed her responsibilities until she was replaced in November 2005 by Arthur Olds. Olds' resume can be found in Appendix A to the March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. As reported in the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, Olds sought reassignment to a teaching possession at Dunbar Magnet Middle School on April 14, 2006. Dr. Williams again temporarily assumed the Testing Coordinator Page 3 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 4 of 30 - responsibilities. LRSD posted the Testing Coordinator position in June, 2006 and interviews were scheduled for August, 2006. See September I, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A new testing coordinator, Danyell Cummings was hired October 1, 2006. Her resume is attached as Exhibit A to this Compliance Report. 8. The current PRE staff has all of the qualifications listed in paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD complied with paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 9. The requirements of paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy are: B. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. It may take a decade or more for LRSD to make sufficient progress in improving the academic achievement of African-American students to justify discontinuing the need for specific  2.7 programs. For that reason, the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. Only then will I have the necessary assurance that LRSD intends to continue using that process for as long as it is needed to determine the effectiveness of the various key  2. 7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Part of LRSD's proof, at the next compliance hearing, must include evidence that it has devised and implemented a comprehensive program assessment process, which has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. I suggest that LRSD use Dr. Ross to assist in developing this comprehensive program assessment process\nthen be sure that he approves that process before it is finalized and implemented. 10. LRSD has devised and deeply embedded a comprehensive program Page 4 of L9 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 5 of 30 - assessment process in accordance with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in developing the comprehensive program assessment process. By the time of the first Quarterly Update on December 1, 2004, PRE and Dr. Ross had \"developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSD's educational operations.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 6. The final draft of that process is found at Appendix B of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This final draft was furnished to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors more than a month in advance of its consideration by the LRSD Board of Directors. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process was approved by the LRSD Board on December 16, 2004. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process has become deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included the development of school portfolios. \"School portfolios assemble comprehensive data about classrooms, schools, and districts from disparate sources into data bases that are accessible and informative particularly to teachers and administrators as well as to board members, parents, and other stakeholders.\" September 1, 2005 Page 5 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 6 of 30 - Quarterly Update, p. 3. School portfolios are useful for formative evaluations of student achievement and educational programs. LRSD began implementing school portfolios during the 2005-06 school year. Id. As part of the process of the development and implementation of portfolios, four PRE department members attended an institute for data analysis during the summer of 2005, and a consultant \"visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures and resources.\" Id. 12. LRSD has continued to develop the infrastructure to support its comprehensive assessment process. School and district data portfolios are an important part of this infrastructure. These portfolios \"allow PRE staff as well as others to more easily analyze data and intersect various types of data sets to answer research questions about comprehensive school improvement efforts.\" December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. During April of 2006, an expert on school portfolios provided professional development for LRSD principals, administrators, and the PRE staff regarding the creation and use of school portfolios. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 13. As of December 1, 2005, PRE had identified the data to be included in the district portfolio and had designed a draft district portfolio. Id. District administrators and principals were making use of the portfolio and steps were being taken \"to allow a more efficient collection of data related to educational Page 6 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 7 of 30 - processes.\" Id. Dr. Catterall used data from LRSD's portfolio in his step 2 evaluation of the Year-Round Education program. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 14. The development of portfolios is a continual process. As new data becomes available (e.g. new test results) they are added to the data base. The infrastructure is in place, and LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolios. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 15. LRSD has also sought to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process by hiring a consultant, the Janis Group, to help develop a \"data warehouse.\" The Janis Group has \"expertise in storing, integrating, and efficiently accessing data.\" March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. The data warehouse will support frequent updates of the portfolio and allow timely data reports for purposes of planning, research, evaluation and developing policy. Reports can be generated by program, classroom, school, grade, or district-wide. Id. 16. There was some debate within LRSD about whether to purchase an internet-based data warehouse from a company called TetraData or to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse using the Business Objects software and the database already available to LRSD. LRSD decided, with some dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. Page 7 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 8 of 30 - Business Objects is state of the art software which can be effectively used in the assessment of academic programs. The capabilities of the Business Objects data warehouse, including updating and reporting student data, are shown in the \"Business Objects Reporting Tools\" document attached as Exhibit B to this Compliance Report. 17. The process of developing school and district portfolios, and creating a data warehouse, has revealed the need for LRSD to take steps to insure that the data entered into its database is accurate. The accuracy of the data would be a concern whether the district used the Business Objects system, the TetraData system or some other software system. To improve the accuracy of data reporting within LRSD, LRSD has increased the number of \"error checking routines\" in its computer software. LRSD also has a full time training coordinator whose job it is to train school registrars and other LRSD personnel in the proper entry of student data, to work with those people to identify and correct recurring data entry errors, and to generally assure the accuracy and completeness of student data within the LRSD database. The accuracy of the data in LRSD's database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. 18. Finally, as another part of embedding the comprehensive program assessment process, PRE has designed \"feasible, ongoing assessments of the four Page 8 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 9 of 30 - programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations last year.\" June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD also plans to have PRE conduct ongoing assessments of the programs currently being evaluated by Drs. Ross and Catterall. 19. LRSD has devised a comprehensive program assessment process as required by paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. That process has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum program. LRSD has complied with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. 20. The requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy are: C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four ( 4) formal step 2 evaluations. Each of these step 2 evaluations must cover one of the key 2.7 programs, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Thus, over the course of the next two academic school years, LRSD must hire outside consultants to prepare a total of eight (8) formal step 2 evaluations of key  2.7 programs. During the recent compliance hearing, Dr. Ross made it clear that LRSD must conduct these formal step 2 evaluations of the key  2.7 programs in order to continue to make progress in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. Again, I suggest that LRSD hire Dr. Ross -- to perform the following tasks: (1) identify the four key 2.7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year\nand (2) prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. If Dr. Ross cannot prepare all eight of the step 2 evaluations, I recommend that LRSD hire someone that Dr. Ross recommends as possessing the experience and ability necessary Page 9 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 0 of 30 to prepare those evaluations. 21. In accordance with paragraph C, LRSD hired Dr. Ross to \"identify the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year,\" and to \"prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible.\" 22. Dr. Ross was provided a copy of the Compliance Remedy and he endorsed the first Quarterly Update \"as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, Appendix C (p. 45). Dr. Ross assumed responsibility for preparing six of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations. Three of those cover the 2004-05 school year and were filed on February 6, 2006. Two others are for the 2005-06 school year and will be filed today. The sixth step 2 evaluation being prepared by Dr. Ross, Pre-K Literacy, has been delayed due to the unavailability of necessary data and is expected to be completed no later than November 15, 2006. 23. Two of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations were prepared by Dr. James Catterall. One covered the 2004-05 school year and was filed on February 6, 2006. The other will be filed today. Page 10 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 11 of 30 24. PRE, in collaboration with Dr. Ross, selected Reading Recovery, Smart/Thrive, Compass Learning and Year-Round Education to be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 7-9. Those evaluations have been completed. 25. Dr. Ross initially identified the following four 2.7 programs for step 2 evaluations in the 2005-06 school year: Arkansas A+ School Network\nKnowledgePoints\nPLATO Learning and Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Development. June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. At the request of the Joshua Intervenors, and with the agreement of Dr. Ross, 21 st Century Community Learning Centers was substituted for PLATO Learning as the subject of an evaluation for the 2005- 06 school year. September 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4 and Appendix C, (pp. 19-21). KnowledgePoints was also replaced as the subject of evaluation by the READ 180 program because the supplier of KnowledgePoints withdrew its support of the program in Arkansas. December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. 26. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall possess the experience and ability necessary to prepare the eight required step 2 evaluations. Their qualifications are found in Appendix C to the first Quarterly Update (pp. 46-54). They are both familiar with the requirements of the Compliance Remedy and have agreed to prepare their evaluations in accordance with those requirements. LRSD has Page 11 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 12 of 30 - complied with the requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. 27. The requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy are: D. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations must answer the following essential research question: \"Has the  2.7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented m schools throughout the district?\" The eight step 2 evaluations may also answer as many other research questions as the designers of each evaluation deem necessary and appropriate. Each of the step 2 evaluations must be organized and written in such a way that it can be readily understood by a lay person. I will allow the outside experts preparing each of these evaluations to decide on the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data that need to be analyzed in preparing each evaluation. PRE must: ( 1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants hired to prepare these step 2 evaluations\nand (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support in preparing these step 2 evaluations. 28. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations answers the essential research question of whether the program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations also answers other important research questions. Each is organized and written so that it can be readily understood by a lay person. In each case, the outside experts and the evaluation teams determined the evaluation design, including the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data necessary to the utility of each Page 12 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 13 of 30 evaluation. 29. PRE has overseen the preparation of all eight step 2 evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and those associated with them, to support their work and provide any and all requested assistance. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp.6-7\nMarch 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 4\nJune 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 5-6\nSeptember 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 6 and Appendix A. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy. 30. The requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy are: E. In order to streamline LRSD's record-keeping obligation, I am going to require that each of the eight step 2 evaluations contain, in addition to the traditional information and data, a special section which: (1) describes the number of teachers and administrators, at the various grade levels, who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the key  2.7 program being evaluated\n(2) lists each of the recommended program modifications, if any, that were deemed necessary in order to increase the effectiveness of each of the  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (3) briefly explains how each of the recommended modifications is expected to increase the effectiveness of the  2.7 program. This requirement is intended to relieve LRSD of any independent record-keeping obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. 31. In accordance with paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy, each of the eight step 2 evaluations contains a section concerning data collection which Page 13 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 14 of 30 - describes the number of teachers and administrators at various grade levels who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the program being evaluated. Each of the eight evaluations also contains recommended program modifications and explains how the recommended modifications can be expected to increase the effectiveness of the program. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 4-5. 32. On April 18, 2006, LRSD convened the four evaluation teams which worked on the 2004-05 evaluations to consider the feasibility and the timeframe for implementing the external evaluators' recommendations. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A summary of LRSD's commitments to the modifications recommended by the external evaluators is found in Appendix A (pp. 7-11) to the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. LRSD will follow the same process of reviewing the evaluators' recommended modifications following receipt of the evaluations for the 2005-06 school year. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy. 33. The requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy are: F. As soon as PRE and Dr. Ross identify the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations, PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must Page 14 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 15 of 30 provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval. I expect the Board to approve LRSD's comprehensive program assessment process no later than December 31, 2004. 34. In accordance with paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, PRE notified ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update\np. 8. PRE also provided to ODM and Joshua a final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented to the Board for approval. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 6 and 11. The LRSD Board of Directors approved the comprehensive program assessment process on December 16, 2004, in advance of the December 31, 2004 deadline. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy. 35. The requirements of paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy are: G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year. These quarterly updates must be delivered to the ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1 of each of those two academic school years. As soon as each of the eight step 2 evaluations has been completed and approved by the Board, LRSD must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua. 36. In accordance with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy, Page 15 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 16 of 30 LRSD submitted quarterly written updates to the Court and delivered them to ODM and Joshua on or before December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, December 1, 2005, March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006 and September 1, 2006. Those quarterly written updates reported \"the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations\" prepared during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. The quarterly updates also provided information on the status of compliance with other components of the Compliance Remedy. 36. As soon as the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were completed and approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD provided them to ODM and Joshua. 1bree of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on October 16, 2006. The fourth will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on or before November 15, 2006. As soon as the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year are approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD will provide final copies of those evaluations to ODM and Joshua. LRSD has complied with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy. 37. The requirements of paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy are: Page 16 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 17 of 30 J. The four step program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2005. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2006. 38. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were filed with the Court on February 6, 2006 in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005- 06 school year will be filed on today in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Dr. Ross requires additional time to complete the Pre-K Literacy evaluation because of the delayed availability of necessary testing data. LRSD has requested an extension of time for the filing of that step 2 evaluation to - and including November 15, 2006, and expects to file that evaluation by that date. LR.SD has substantially complied with paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy. 39. The requirements of paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy are: K. On or before October 15, 2006, LRSD must file a Compliance Report documenting its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. If Joshua wishes to challenge LRSD's substantial compliance, they must file objections on or before November 15, 2006. Thereafter, I will schedule a compliance hearing and decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. 40. LRSD is filing this Compliance Report on October 16, 2006 in accordance with paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy and the Court's July 12, Page 17 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 18 of 30 2006 letter to the parties (docket no. 4027). WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the eight Quarterly Updates which have been filed with the Court, and on the basis of the completion of eight step 2 program evaluations by Drs. Ross and Catterall, LRSD prays for an order finding it to be in substantial compliance with the Compliance Remedy contained in the Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion, declaring LRSD to be a unitary school district, and releasing LRSD from all supervision and monitoring by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) Khayyam M. Eddings (#02008) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 /s/ Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 16, 2006, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: Page 18 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 19 of 30 mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar.us si ones(a),mwsgw .com sjones@ilj .com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 /s/ Christopher Heller Page 19 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 .. P~e 20 of,,30 Career Objective: Professional Experience: 2004-Present 1998-Present Educadon: May,2005 December, ! 998 May, 1997 Professionally Related Activities: Danyel) Crutchfield Cummlnp S Ben Hogan Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 (501) 407-8097 (501) 447-1737 To utilize proven academic and professional experience to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contribute to a progressive educational environment. High Schools TI1at Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal English Teacher J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher of the Year Educational Specialist Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Docum-en-t 40-50- -Filed 10/16/2006 ~~~-~ ?.! .~ ( 30 References: Linda Young Grants Coordinator (501) 447-3372 work (501) 225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501) 447-4300 work (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 work (501) 407-0817 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.D Assistant Principal J.A. Fair Systems Magnet High School (501) 447-1700 ext. 1710 work (501) 666-6216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/200~-~~ge 22 o!}0_ Career Objective: Professional Experience: 2004-Present 1998-Present EducatJon: May,2005 December, 1998 May, 1997 Professionally Related Activities: Danyell Crutchfield Cummings 5 Ben Hogan Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 (501) 407-8097 (501) 447-1737 To utilize proven academic and professional e~1jeriencc to obtain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contribute to a progressive educational environment. High Schools TI1at Work Coordinator J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock. Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal English Teacher J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Principal Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and Supervision, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Master of Education, Secondary Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bachelor of Arts, English, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Acting Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of See-0ndary Education Stakeholder Southern Regional Education Board Literacy Team member Teacher of the Year Educational Specialist ' Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 References: ----------- -- ------ Linda Young Grants Coordinator (501) 447-3372 work (501) 225-5439 home Jill Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elementary (501) 447-4300 work (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed.D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 work (501) 407-0817 home Sharon Cauley, Ed.D Assistant Principal ].A. Fair Systems Magnet High School (501) 447-1700 ext. 1710 work (501) 666-{\n216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 24 of 30 Bl Platform Little Rock School District Business Objects Reporting Tools Business Objects Enterprise is a scalable, adaptive platform that delivers insight and corporate infonnation to all your end users. With a platform designed to help you confidently deploy and manage your Business Intelligence (BI) implementations, Business Objects 'provides the Little Rock School District with the extreme insight you need to extend your competitive advantage . . The BI Platform provides a set of common services to simplify deployment and management of BI tools, reports, and applications. The reporting system at the Little Rock School District includes information delivery in subject areas including Student Demographics, Student Performance, Budget and Finance, Employee Attendance, Child Nutrition, Human Resources, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Procurement, and Procurement Warehouse, to name a few. Flexible Services-Oriented Platform By building the Little Rock School District's BI solutions with Business Objects Enterprise, we have the flexibility to deploy a solution for a single information challenge, while being able to simultaneously expand the deployment as our needs evolve. Designed for Scalability and High Performance Business Objects Enterprise is designed for scalability, reliability, fault-tolerance, extensibility, and 24/7 availability. This platforn1 recognizes the importance of diverse global deployments, supports Unicode, and is compliant with Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, IBM A.IX, HP-UX, and Linux. So you can start with a single BI project on one platform, and easily grow to support an enterprise-wide standardization initiative on multiple platforms. With BI content now being delivered via intranet and extranet, BI platform scalability is a key issue. Business Objects Enterprise has the scalability you need to accommodate increasing numbers of users, process growing volumes of infonnation, and scale on a single machine-or clusters of machineswhile maintaining high performance. Proven Reliability This platform's key attributes-performance, reliability, and scalability-are proven by extensive, realworld testing and third-party certification. Enterprise is the only BI platform to achieve Microsoft Windows 2003 Datacenter certification. Business Objects Enterprise-- covered by a 24/7 technical customer support-has demonstrably installed and run on a 32-processor system, remained stable through rigorous stress testing, and stayed available after being subject to extensive failover conditions. We also continually conduct extensive benchmarking and p erfonnance testing to ensure our platform scales to meet the needs of the Little Rock School District today and tomorrow. 'i ----------------~ LRSD Bl Tools if! EXHIBIT B .._ ____ .,, Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 25 of 30 Reporting Fundamentals The fundamental requirements of any reporting system are a normalized database and a reporting tool. Data from disparate systems and formats is collected in a centralized database platform and transformed into a consistent, well organized reporting database. Many reports have been created and delivered from this reporting database using Crystal Reports as the reporting tool. Normalized Data This data, securely housed at the Little Rock School District Technology Center, has been normalized to 3rd normal form on a Microsoft SQL Server database server. The original database management software is DB2 residing on an IBM AS/400 application server, w]ch houses a majority of the studentbased data. Other student data resides in Microsoft Access or is provided to the CIS department via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Automated processes have been developed and scheduled to update the student data nightly, where required. Processes have also been designed and implemented to update data in key financial, human resources and accounting subject areas. Business Objects provides the industry's leading suite of integrated business intelligence products. The products are categorized into three groups: Reporting allows all levels of the Little Rock School District to access, format, and deliver data as meaningful information to large populations of information consumers like teachers and school administrators both inside and outside the organization. This is provided through detailed reports created using Crystal Reports and accessed via a web browser using the Business Objects Enterprise Info View application. Query and Analysis tools allow end users to interact with District information and answer ad hoc questions, without advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and structures. This is provided through a product called Web Intelligence or WEBI. This allows users to create dynamic reports from their desks with little or no required knowledge of the underlying database schema. In-depth analysis is performed using OLAP Intelligence, a powerful OnLine Analytic Processing tool that provides detailed, fast, multidimensional data for sophisticated comparative analysis and reporting. Performance Management products help users align with strategy by tracking and analyzing key business and educational metrics and goals via management dashboards, scorecards, and alerting. This is provided through Performance Manager and Dashboard Manager products that present Key Performance Indicators in user-friendly, interactive graphical tools. Crystal Reports A world standard for enterprise reporting, Crystal Reports is an intuitive reporting solution that helps customers rapidly create flexible, feature-rich, high-fidelity reports and tightly integrate them into web and Windows applications. The Crystal Reports enterprise reporting solution consists of: LRSD Bl Tools Pagel o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 26 of 30  Powerful report design: Report authors can use the visual report designer (with a complete set of layout and design controls), to design highly formatted, interactive, and professional-looking reports. And they can design within the leading .NET and Java development tools without having to step out of their chosen development environment.  Flexible application development: Developers can leverage cross-platform support for Java, .NET, and COM development technologies. HTML is generated directly by Crystal Reports, allowing developers to focus on application business logic, rather than tedious, time-intensive hand coding. Separation of application development and report design tasks allow developers to focus on application development, while the report authors can focus on report design.  Report management and delivery: Reports are easily published to the web, for better business decisions in all areas of the Little Rock School District. Reports can be exported and repurposed to the electronic formats used by most end users (e.g. PDF and Excel). IT ean centralize the management of operational reporting while distributing the report authoring function out to departments of the District that need them. The following themes are an overview of what features are available in Crystal Reports XI:  Powerful data access and report design  Enhanced productivity and maintenance  Report management and delivery Dynamic and Cascading Prompts Report prompts can be based on dynamic values. This means that report designers no longer have to maintain static prompt value lists within individual reports. Instead, they can reuse existing prompts stored in the repository. HTML Preview The iterative report design/view process is streamlined, with a new HTML preview that allows report authors to see how reports will look when published to the web. Editable RTF Format This new feature is ideal for report export editing. It delivers reports to end users in a new RTF format, so they can easily make their own document modifications. Report Export Configuration The report designer can save report export configuration information within the report itself so that the end user forgoes the time and trouble of reconfiguring the export each time a report is run. Dependencv Checker With the new dependency checker, report authors can quickly .find broken links, formula errors, and dependency issues. This greatly reduces the time spent on QA. Business Views Speed Report Design and Maintenance Cycles Crystal Enterprise Business Views helps you better manage reporting across multiple data sources and applications by simplifying data access, change management, and data-level security processes. An LRSD Bf Tools Page3 ofl Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 27 of 30 optional service in Crystal Enterprise, Business Views allow you to integrate data from disparate sources, handle promotion/demotion between development and production environments, and control security at both the row and column level. Simplified Data Access Data access is one of the most fundamental, yet difficult aspects of designing a report. Locating the right data, joining tables appropriately, and filtering the data to focus on a specific subject area requires an indepth knowledge of the underlying data structures. The Business View Manager allows you to simplify data access for your report designers by insulating them from the raw data structures. You can build connections to multiple data sources, join tables, alias field names, create calculated fields, and then surface this simplified structure as a Business View in Crystal Enterprise. Your report designers can then connect to Crystal Enterprise and use the Business View as the basis for their report, rather than accessing the data directly and building their own queries. Business Views helps administrators pull data together from disparate sources. Data Connections (created visually or with complex SQL statements) can be integrated into a Data Foundation. Once the Data Foundation is built, Business Elements (a collection ofrelated fields from the Data Foundation) can be created and combined into a Business View. The modular architecture of Business Views also allows you to readily re-use various components of one Business View to build other Business Views. A single, broad data foundation can serve as the basis for multiple, specialized Business Views. Used carefully, these capabilities allow you to minimize the number of changes required to introduce new data, fields, or formulas into your system. Granular Data-level Security Many reporting scenarios involve complex security requirements. Each user is entitled to see a slightly different slice of District data, based on their School, Department or level of seniority. Data in the Little Rock School District is commonly segregated by School and Teacher-based infonnation. Business Views allow teachers to view data regarding their students and prevents them form seeing data regarding students that are NOT assigned to them. Rather than creating a number of different reports to meet this need, we can create a single report and use the security features of Business Views to filter data appropriately for each user. Using the Business View Manager, you can set up row- or column-level filters and map these filters to users or user groups stored in your existing LDAP, Active Directory, or Windows authentication provider. This security is  then consistently applied at the data level, ensuring that any report design based on a Business View will respect the underlying data security. You can then choose to schedule the report to run regularly. Or you can allow users to refresh it on demand. Regardless, Crystal Enterprise can generate a master instance of the report (with all the data included if you run the report under an administrator context) and then filter the report every time a user views it. All exporting, printing, and report modification requests will also return only the data the user is entitled to see. LRSD Bl Tools Page 4 of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 28 of 30 Change Management and Re-use Maintaining a large set ofreports is often more time-consuming and complex than new development. Activities such as making small changes in response to user needs, updating business calculations, changing formatting, and moving your reports between development and production data sources all delay you from addressing new requirements. Business Views includes two key features to help you spend less time on report maintenance. First, you can use Dynamic Data Connections to store connections to multiple instances of the same database (e.g., development, test, and production). By passing a parameter when you're designing (or scheduling) the report, you can select which data source the report runs against. Second, you can store commonly-used functions, text objects, and logos directly in your data foundation. This allows you to easily roll changes across multiple reports by changing the object once. Business Objects Enterprise Info View Business Objects Info View is a completely redesigned web interface that enables user to navigate, create, and interact with District information. Integrated search and navigation tools allow users to easily find the information they need. Users can also personalize their interactions to simplify consumption of District information. Info View is built to support Java and Microsoft based web servers, to easily fit within you're the Little Rock School District IT infrastructure. Web Intelligence Many organizations find it difficult to access information not contained in standard reports. And requests to IT for new information simply add to the report backlog. Even when ad hoc query capabilities are available, they're typically difficult to use and don't provide your non-technical users with a simple method of exploring information, to really understand the business issue at hand. With Business Objects Web Intelligence, both self-service access to information and data analysis are available in one product, helping your users turn educational analysis into effective decisions. Users can create a query from scratch, format the infonnation retrieved, and analyze it to understand underlying trends and root causes. If the full power of query capabilities is not required, users can simply analyze information in existing reports-formatting and exploring them to meet specific needs. OLAP Intelligence Business Objects OLAP Intelligence is a powerful and easy-to-use tool that allows you to access and analyze data stored in the leading OLAP servers. It uniquely satisfies the analysis requirements of both information analysts (power users) and less sophisticated knowledge workers (business users). With OLAP Intelligence, power users can slice and dice, drill, rank, sort, filter, create calculations on the fly, and perform speed-of-thought data exploration. And business users can interact with pre-built OLAP workbooks that contain highly intuitive, graphical views of educational activity, guided navigation and workflows, and flexible ad hoc analysis. Its advanced analysis capabilities, shared security, and relational drill-through allow you to standardize on Business Objects for all of your BI needs. OLAP Intelligence delivers:  Best-of-breed ad hoc OLAP  Managed OLAP authoring and distribution  Integration with the market leading, trusted BI platform LRSD Bl Tools Page 5 of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 29 of 30 Best-of-Breed Ad Hoc OLAP The primary driver for implementing an OLAP database is to provide users with fast access to multidimensional data. IT develops focused OLAF cubes to provide users with a structured data environment, optimized for analysis. But in order for users to take advantage of the pre-aggregated data within an OLAP cube, they require an interface that allows them to drill, slice, and dice while leveraging the response times that the predefined OLAP cube environment offers. Speed-of-Thought Analysis OLAP Intelligence provides an intuitive, web-based interface that allows users to select dimensions and members from a query panel as well as perform similar analysis from integrated Windows, Microsoft Excel, and ActiveX client interfaces. Users can interact with their data and ask spontaneous questions to uncover trends and identify anomalies. And because OLAP Intelligence takes advantage of the power of the OLAP cube, users are guaranteed speed-of-thought response time. Intuitive, Function-Rich Interface The OLAP Intelligence interface is both intuitive and function-rich. Common functions such as ranking, filtering, highlighting, quick calculations, zero suppression, and axis swapping are available with a single click oftbe mouse. More advanced analyses are only a few mouse clicks away and provide an uncluttered, intuitive user interface that requires minimal training. With OLAP Intelligence, users can also asymmetrically display data and hide specific dimensions that are irrelevant to data exploration. Deep, Open Access to Microsoft, Hyperion, and SAP OLAP Servers With OLAP Intelligence, you get best-of-breed, ad hoc OLAP for today's leading, multidimensional database servers-Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services, Hyperion Essbase, IBM DB2 OLAP, and SAP BW. For example, native Hyperion Essbase 7 .x support for free-form calculations and cube actions means that organizations are maximizing their OLAP server investments and taking advantage of key enhancements and optimizations. Managed OLAP Authoring and Distribution OLAP Intelligence goes further than most OLAP clients on the market today by not only providing powerful ad hoc analysis, but also delivering a flexible, managed OLAP environment. With OLAP Intelligence, you can easily create sophisticated workbooks that exploit the power of the underlying OLAP server, and enable users to build in predefined navigation paths and workflows. Then you can securely deploy and deliver the workbooks live to business users who don't necessarily fit the powerdata analyst profile. These OLAP workbooks may contain custom buttons and multi-page reports that recipients can view and interact with over the web. Publish Live OLAP Workbooks to Business Users When users view an OLAP Intelligence workbook over the web, it may appear as a dashboard with custom functionality specific to one area of the business, or as an ad hoc interface that allows them to perform advanced analysis. Because OLAP Intelligence has a flexible design and was created to meet powerful ad hoc and managed analysis needs, the deployment possibilities are limitless. Built-In Guided Navigation and Data Exploration LRSD Bl Tools Page 6 of l Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4050 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 30 of 30 With OLAP Intelligence you can guide users through the OLAP data navigation and exploration process. For example, a user can highlight a group of cells in a report, click a custom analysis button, and view a new graph that has drilled down on the chosen group, displaying variances as a worksheet and chart. A show trend analysis button could then be made available that displays a new page in the workbook with a year-over-year comparison. Open drill-through capabilities in OLAP Intelligence empower users to dril1 from aggregated OLAP data down to relational details. This means that users can navigate and explore summarized infonnation, and drill through and pass context to more detailed Crystal Reports or Business Objects Web Intelligence documents. This contextual drill-through technology provides users with intelligent navigation without the need to understand the complexities of underlying data and metadata structures. LRSD Bl Tools Page 7 o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2006 mea: QtRBATIUIOmomJIS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REVISED COMPLIANCE REPORT . For its Revised Compliance Report, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. This Compliance Report is filed pursuant to paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy contained in this Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion. The reason for revising the Compliance Report is to correctly reflect the fact that school portfolios, as opposed to the district portfolio, have not been implemented in LRSD. The substantive changes from the initial Compliance Report are found in paragraphs eleven through sixteen. 2. LRSD has substantially complied with the Compliance Remedy. This Page 1 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 30 compliance is documented below, as well as in the eight Quarterly Updates which were filed between December 1, 2004 and September 1, 2006, the evaluations of Compass Leaming, Smart/Thrive, Reading Recovery and Year-Round Education which were previously filed, and the evaluations of A+, 21 st _Century Community Leaming Centers and READ 180 which are filed with this Compliance Report. 3. The progress ofLRSD's efforts to comply with the requirement for an eighth step 2 program evaluation, the Pre-K Literacy evaluation, has been shown in LRSD's Quarterly Updates and status reports to the Court. The final evidence of LRSD's compliance with that requirement will be the evaluation itself, which the evaluator, Dr. Ross, expects to have completed on or before November 15, 2006. 4. LRSD will separately describe below its compliance with each of the requirements of the Compliance Remedy except those which set out the responsibilities of the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 5. The requirements of paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy are: A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. These individuals must have experience in: (a) preparing and overseeing the preparation of formal program evaluations\nand (b) formulating a comprehensive program assessment process that can be used to determine the effectiveness of specific academic programs designed to improve the achievement of African-American Page 2 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 30 students. I expect the director of PRE to have a Ph.D.\nto have extensive experience in designing, preparing and overseeing the preparation of program evaluations\nand to have a good understanding of statistics and regression analysis. I also expect LRSD to hire experienced statisticians and the other appropriate support personnel necessary to operate a first-rate PRE Department. 6. LRSD met the requirements of paragraph A by adding to . the PRE team three new professionals who have knowledge and experience in assessment, evaluation, and statistical analysis. The qualifications of the seven people who were employed by PRE as of November 1, 2004 are shown at pages 3 through 5 of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. The resumes of PRE Director Dr. Karen DeJamette and statisticians Maurecia Malcolm Robinson, James C. Wohlleb and Dr. Ed Williams are found in Appendix A to the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This highly trained team of professionals has the qualifications required by paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 7. There have been a few changes in personnel since the first Quarterly Update, but PRE has maintained a highly trained team of professionals. Administrative Assistant Irma Shelton took medical leave in May of 2005. The Administrative Assistant position was eliminated on July 1, 2005. Testing Coordinator Yvette Dillingham left PRE in August, 2005. Dr. Ed Williams temporarily assumed her responsibilities until she was replaced in November 2005 Page 3 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 30 by Arthur Olds. Olds' resume can be found in Appendix A to the March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. As reported in the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, Olds sought reassignment to a teaching possession at Dunbar Magnet Middle School on April 14, 2006. Dr. Williams again temporarily assumed the Testing Coordinator responsibilities. LRSD posted the Testing Coordinator position in June, 2006 and interviews were scheduled for August, 2006. See September 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A new testing coordinator, Danyell Cummings was hired October 1, 2006. Her resume is attached as Exhibit A to this Compliance Report. 8. The current PRE staff has all of the qualifications listed in paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. LRSD complied with paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy. 9. The requirements of paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy are: B. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process. It may take a decade or more for LRSD to make sufficient progress in improving the academic achievement of African-American students to justify discontinuing the need for specific  2.7 programs. For that reason, the comprehensive program assessment process must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. Only then will I have the necessary assurance that LRSD intends to continue using that process for as long as it is needed to determine the effectiveness of the various key  2. 7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. Part of LRSD's proof, at the next compliance hearing, must include evidence that it has devised and implemented a comprehensive Page 4 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 30 program assessment process, which has been deeply embedded as a pennanent part of its curriculum and instruction program. l suggest that LRSD use Dr. Ross to assist in developing this comprehensive program assessment process\nthen be sure that he approves that process before it is finalized and implemented. 10. LRSD has devised and deeply embedded a comprehensive program assessment process in accordance with paragraph B of the Compliance . Remedy. LRSD used Dr. Ross to assist in developing the comprehensive program assessment process. By the time of the first Quarterly Update on December 1, 2004, PRE and Dr. Ross had \"developed and shared with ODM and the Joshua Intervenors a program assessment process to be deeply embedded in LRSD's educational operations.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 6. The final draft of that process is found at Appendix B of the December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update. This final draft was furnished to ODM and the Joshua Intervenors more than a month in advance of its consideration by the LRSD Board of Directors. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, p. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process was approved by the LRSD Board on December 16, 2004. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 11. The comprehensive program assessment process has become deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum and instruction program. The embedding of the comprehensive program assessment process has included Page 5 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 6 of 30 the development of a school district portfolio. As part of the process of the development and implementation of the portfolio, four PRE department members attended an institute for data analysis during the summer of 2005, and a consultant \"visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures anq resources.\" Id. 12. LRSD has continued to develop the infrastructure to support its comprehensive assessment process. A district portfolio is an important part of this infrastructure. The portfolio will \"allow PRE staff as well as others to more easily analyze data and intersect various types of data sets to answer research questions about comprehensive school improvement efforts.\" December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 13. As of December 1, 2005, PRE had identified the data to be included in the district portfolio and had designed a draft district portfolio. Id. District administrators and principals were making use of the portfolio and steps were being taken \"to allow a more efficient collection of data related to educational processes.\" Id. Dr. Catterall used data from LRSD's portfolio in his step 2 evaluation of the Year-Round Education program. March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 14. The development of the district portfolio is a continual process. As new data becomes available (e.g. new test results) they are added to the data base. Page 6 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 7 of 30 The infrastructure is in place, and LRSD continues to expand and update its portfolio. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. 15. During April of 2006, an expert on school portfolios provided professional development for LRSD principals, adminis.trators, and the PRE staff regarding the creation and use of school portfolios. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD expects to begin the creation of school portfolios during the 2007-08 school year. 16. LRSD has also sought to deeply embed the comprehensive program assessment process by hiring a consultant, the Janis Group, to help develop a \"data warehouse.\" The Janis Group has \"expertise in storing, integrating, and efficiently accessing data.\" March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. The data warehouse will support frequent updates of the portfolio and allow timely data reports for purposes of planning, research, evaluation and developing policy. The data warehouse will allow reports to be generated by program, classroom, school, grade, or districtwide. Id. 17. There was some debate within LRSD about whether to purchase an internet-based data warehouse from a company called TetraData or to continue the in-house design and construction of a data warehouse using the Business Objects software and the database already available to LRSD. LRSD decided, with some Page 7 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 8 of 30 dissent from PRE, to continue to use and improve the Business Objects software. Business Objects is state of the art software which can be effectively used in the assessment of academic programs. The capabilities of the Business Objects data warehouse, including updating and reporting student. data, are shown in the \"Business Objects Reporting Tools\" document attached as Exhibit B to this Compliance Report. 18. The process of developing school and district portfolios, and creating a data warehouse, has revealed the need for LRSD to take steps to insure that the data entered into its database is accurate. The accuracy of the data would be a concern whether the district used the Business Objects system, the TetraData system or some other software system. To improve the accuracy of data reporting within LRSD, LRSD has increased the number of \"error checking routines\" in its computer software. LRSD also has a full time training coordinator whose job it is to train school registrars and other LRSD personnel in the proper entry of student data, to work with those people to identify and correct recurring data entry errors, and to generally assure the accuracy and completeness of student data within the LRSD database. The accuracy of the data in LRSD's database, including its portfolios, continues to improve. 19. Finally, as another part of embedding the comprehensive program - Page 8 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 9 of 30 assessment process, PRE has designed \"feasible, ongoing assessments of the four programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations last year.\" June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD also plans to have PRE conduct ongoing assessments of the programs currently being evaluated by Drs. Ross and Catterall. 20. LRSD has devised a comprehensive program assessment process as required by paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. That process has been deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSD's curriculum program. LRSD has complied with paragraph B of the Compliance Remedy. 21. The requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy are: C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. Each of these step 2 evaluations must cover one of the key 2.7 programs, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Thus, over the course of the next two academic school years, LRSD must hire outside consultants to prepare a total of eight (8) formal step 2 evaluations of key  2.7 programs. During the recent compliance hearing, Dr. Ross made it clear that LRSD must conduct these formal step 2 evaluations of the key  2.7 programs in order to continue to make progress in improving the academic achievement of AfricanAmerican students. Again, I suggest that LRSD hire Dr. Ross -- to perform the following tasks: ( 1) identify the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year\nand (2) prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible. If Dr. Ross cannot prepare all eight of the Page 9 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 10 of 30 step 2 evaluations, I recommend that LRSD hire someone that Dr. Ross recommends as possessing the experience and ability necessary to prepare those evaluations. 22. In accordance with paragraph C, LRSD hired Dr. Ross to \"identify the four key  2.7 programs that should be formally eval~ated during the 2004-05 school year and the four key  2. 7 programs that should be formally evaluated during the 2005-06 school year,\" and to \"prepare as many of the eight step 2 evaluations as possible.\" 23. Dr. Ross was provided a copy of the Compliance Remedy and he endorsed the first Quarterly Update \"as representing an accurate portrayal of accomplishments to date and a viable plan for addressing the requirements of the Remedy.\" December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, Appendix C (p. 45). Dr. Ross assumed responsibility for preparing six of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations. Three of those cover the 2004-05 school year and were filed on February 6, 2006. Two others are for the 2005-06 school year and will be filed today. The sixth step 2 evaluation being prepared by Dr. Ross, Pre-K Literacy, has been delayed due to the unavailability of necessary data and is expected to be completed no later than November 15, 2006. 24. Two of the required eight formal step 2 evaluations were prepared by Dr. James Catterall. One covered the 2004-05 school year and was filed on Page 10 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 11 of 30 February 6, 2006. The other will be filed today. 25. PRE, in collaboration with Dr. Ross, selected Reading Recovery, Smart/Thrive, Compass Leaming and Year-Round Education to be formally evaluated during the 2004-05 school year. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 7-9. Those evaluations have been completed. 26. Dr. Ross initially identified the following four  2.7 programs for step 2 evaluations in the 2005-06 school year: Arkansas A+ School Network\nKnowledgePoints\nPLATO Leaming and Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Development. June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. At the request of the Joshua Intervenors, and with the agreement of Dr. Ross, 21 st Century Community Learning Centers was substituted for PLATO Leaming as the subject of an evaluation for the 2005- 06 school year. September 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4 and Appendix C, (pp. 19-21 ). KnowledgePoints was also replaced as the subject of evaluation by the READ 180 program because the supplier of KnowledgePoints withdrew its support of the program in Arkansas. December 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp. 3-4. 27. Dr. Ross and Dr. Catterall possess the experience and ability necessary to prepare the eight required step 2 evaluations. Their qualifications are found in Appendix C to the first Quarterly Update (pp. 46-54). They are both familiar with the requirements of the Compliance Remedy and have agreed to Page 11 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 12 of 30 prepare their evaluations in accordance with those requirements. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. 28. The requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy are: D. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations must answer the following essential research question: \"Has the  2.7 program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district?\" The eight step 2 evaluations may also answer as many other research questions as the designers of each evaluation deem necessary and appropriate. Each of the step 2 evaluations must be organized and written in such a way that it can be readily understood by a lay person. I will allow the outside experts preparing each of these evaluations to decide on the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data that need to be analyzed in preparing each evaluation. PRE must: (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations\n(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants hired to prepare these step 2 evaluations\nand (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support in preparing these step 2 evaluations. 29. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations answers the essential research question of whether the program being evaluated improved the academic achievement of African-American students, as it has been implemented in schools throughout the district. Each of the eight step 2 evaluations also answers other important research questions. Each is organized and written so that its findings and recommendations can be readily understood by a lay person. In each case, the outside experts and the evaluation teams determined the evaluation design, Page 12 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 13 of 30 including the appropriate number of years of test scores and other data necessary to the utility of each evaluation. 30. PRE has overseen the preparation of all eight step 2 evaluations and worked closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and thos~ associated with them, to support their work and provide any and all requested assistance. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, pp.6-7\nMarch 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 4\nJune 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 5-6\nSeptember 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 6 and Appendix A. LRSD has substantially complied with the requirements of paragraph D of the Compliance Remedy. 31. The requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy are: E. In order to streamline LRSD's record-keeping obligation, I am going to require that each of the eight step 2 evaluations contain, in addition to the traditional information and data, a special section which: (I) describes the number of teachers and administrators, at the various grade levels, who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the key  2.7 program being evaluated\n(2) lists each of the recommended program modifications, if any, that were deemed necessary in order to increase the effectiveness of each of the  2.7 programs in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\nand (3) briefly explains how each of the recommended modifications is expected to increase the effectiveness of the  2. 7 program. This requirement is intended to relieve LRSD of any independent record-keeping obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan and the Compliance Remedy. 32. In accordance with paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy, each of Page 13 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 14 of 30 the eight step 2 evaluations contains a section concerning data collection which describes the number of teachers and administrators at various grade levels who were interviewed or from whom information was received regarding the effectiveness of the program being evaluated. Each of.the ejght evaluations also contains recommended program modifications and explains how the recommended modifications can be expected to increase the effectiveness of the program. See March 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, pp. 4-5. 33. On April 18, 2006, LRSD convened the four evaluation teams which worked on the 2004-05 evaluations to consider the feasibility and the timeframe for implementing the external evaluators' recommendations. June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update, p. 3. A summary of LRSD's commitments to the modifications recommended by the external evaluators is found in Appendix A (pp. 7-11) to the June 1, 2006 Quarterly Update. LRSD will follow the same process of reviewing the evaluators' recommended modifications following receipt of the evaluations for the 2005-06 school year. LRSD has complied with the requirements of paragraph E of the Compliance Remedy. 34. The requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy are: F. As soon as PRE and Dr. Ross identify the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations, PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In Page 14 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 15 of 30 addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval. I expect the Board to approve LRSD's comprehensive program assessment process no later than December 31, 2004. 35. In accordance with paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy, PRE notified ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of the eight  2.7 programs targeted for step 2 evaluations. See June 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 8. PRE also provided to ODM and Joshua a final draft of the comprehensive program assessment process more than thirty days before it was presented to the Board for approval. December 1, 2004 Quarterly Update, pp. 6 and 11. The LRSD Board of - Directors approved the comprehensive program assessment process on December 16, 2004, in advance of the December 31, 2004 deadline. March 1, 2005 Quarterly Update, p. 3. LRSD has met the requirements of paragraph F of the Compliance Remedy. 36. The requirements of paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy are: G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year. These quarterly updates must be delivered to the ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1 of each of those two academic school years. As soon as each of the eight step 2 evaluations has been completed and approved by the Board, LRSD must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua. Page 15 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 16 of 30 37. In accordance with paragraph G of the Compliance Remedy, LRSD submitted quarterly written updates to the Court and delivered them to ODM and Joshua on or before December 1, 2004, March 1, 2005, June 1, 2005, September 1, 2005, December 1, 2005, March 1, 2006, June 1, 2006 and September 1, 2006. Those quarterly written updates reported \"the status of the work being performed on the four step 2 program evaluations\" prepared during the 2004-05 and 2005-06 school years. The quarterly updates also provided information on the status of compliance with other components of the Compliance Remedy. - 38. As soon as the four step 2 evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were completed and approved by the LRSD Board, LRSD provided them to ODM and Joshua. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on October 16, 2006. The fourth will be filed with the Court and provided to ODM and Joshua on or before November 15, 2006. As soon as the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year are approved by the  LRSD Board, LRSD will provide final copies of those evaluations to ODM and Joshua. LRSD has complied with paragraph G of Page 16 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 17 of 30 the Compliance Remedy. 39. The requirements of paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy are: J. The four step program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2005. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005-06 school year must be filed with the Court no later than October 1, 2006.  40. The four step 2 program evaluations for the 2004-05 school year were filed with the Court on February 6, 2006 in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Three of the four step 2 program evaluations for the 2005- 06 school year will be filed on today in accordance with extended deadlines approved by the Court. Dr. Ross requires additional time to complete the Pre-K - Literacy evaluation because of the delayed availability of necessary testing data. LRSD has requested an extension of time for the filing of that step 2 evaluation to and including November 15, 2006, and expects to file that evaluation by that date. LRSD has substantially complied with paragraph J of the Compliance Remedy. 41. The requirements of paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy are: K. On or before October 15, 2006, LRSD must file a Compliance Report documenting its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, as specified in this Compliance Remedy. If Joshua wishes to challenge LRSD's substantial compliance, they must file objections on or before November 15, 2006. Thereafter, I will schedule a compliance hearing and decide whether LRSD has met its obligations under the Compliance Remedy and should be released from all further supervision and monitoring. Page 17 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 18 of 30 42. LRSD is filing this Compliance Report on October 16, 2006 in accordance with paragraph K of the Compliance Remedy and the Court's July 12, 2006 letter to the parties ( docket no. 4027). WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the eight Quarterly Updates which have been filed with the Court, and on the basis of the completion of eight step 2 program evaluations by Drs. Ross and Catterall, LRSD prays for an order finding it to be in substantial compliance with the Compliance Remedy contained in the Court's June 30, 2004 Memorandum Opinion, declaring LRSD to be a unitary school district, and releasing LRSD from all supervision and - monitoring by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) Khayyam M. Eddings (#02008) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 Isl Christopher Heller Page 18 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 19 of 30 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on October 25, 2006, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar.us siones@mwsgw.com sjones@ili.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Isl Christopher Heller Page 19 of 19 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 20 of 30 ---------------------\"-------- Career ObJ~ttvo: Pni!euioaal Experience: 2004-Preseat 1998-Pmont Education: Danyell Crutchne1d CuDUDin,s 5 Ben HOiAJl Con Little Rockt Ar.tamu 72210 (501) 407-Sm (501) 4-47-1737 To utillf.O proven academic and profeseiOJW experience to ob(ain a ch1Uoogi11g positiou u 1n adminillrator that will allow fCt' growth and an opportunity to contribute to 1. prop,ivo cducatiooal onvironmezit. High Schools That Wo(. Coordinator J. A. Fair Systcma Magnet High School Little R.ock, Arb.aw 72210 Randy Ruthrnord. Principal EnsJiahTc~ber J. A. Fair Sy,toim Magnet Hiib School LitlioRQclc,.Arbnsas 72210 Randy Rutherford, Priocip\u0026amp;l May. 2005 Educational Specialist, Educational Administration and SupcmU\u0026gt;D, University of Arlcansas at Little Rock Dccombor, 1993 Muter of Education, Sccondaey Education, University of ArbDsas at Uttlo Rock May, 1997 Bachcl of .Arts, English, Univc:raity of ArlcaDsu at Litt.le ~ Profwlonally Relaud Actlvitia: Actina Assistant Principal Section 504 Coordinator Council of Secondary Education S1Udioldcr Southem Regional Bducali011 Boazd Ut.eracy Team mombcr Teacher oft.be Year Ed~ational Spcc!al!st Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 21 of 30 Refemlca\nLinda Young Grants Cooldinator (501) 447-3372 work (SOl) 225-5439 home Jill Broob Principal David O'Dodd Blcmcntary (501)447-4300 work (SO l) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed,D -Student Heari?lg . (501} 447-3582 work (501) 4070817 homo Sharon Cauley, Ed.D ~istant Principal  J.A. Fair Systems Magnet High Scbcol (501) 447-1700 ext 1710 work (501) 6-66-6216 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 22 of 30 Da11.yell Crutchfield Cummlnp 5 Bea Hogan Cove Little Rock, Arwuu 71210 (501} 407-8097 (501) '47.1737 Caretr ObJe~Uve: Pr.CeatonaJ Experimco: 2004-Present .Ed1tettlon: To utll!zo proven academic and jX'Ofossional experience lo obcain a challenging position as an administrator that will allow for growth and an opportunity to contn1Jutc to a prosn,slive cdul\national onvlromncnt, High Schools That Work Coordinator 1. A. Fair Syatems Magnet High School Little ~ok. Arbnsu 72210 Randy Ruthcrlbtd, Principal English Teach J. A. Fair S)'l~ms Magnet HiiJi School LittloRo\u0026lt;:k,Ar.kallsu 72210 Randy Rutherford, Priucipal May, 2005 Educational Specialist, ducational Administration and SUpcrviaiOl,I, University of Arbnsas at Little Rock D'\"mbcr, 1998 , Master oflldUClltioa, \u0026amp;condaty Education, trniVaity of Arkaasu al Little Rode May, 1997 Bachelor of Arts, English, lroleu.tonally Related ActMtlu: University of Arlcansas at Little Rocle Acting Assistant Principal Section .504 Coordinator Counc:il of Secondary Education Stakcholdct Southom Regional Eduutioo Board Literacy Team JllOl11ber Teacher of the Year Bduoatio.aal Specialist Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 23 of 30 llc!eraic:es: Linda Young Grants Coordinator {501) 447-3372 work (501) 225-5439 home rn1 Brooks Principal David O'Dodd Elcmcnwy (501) 447-4300 woJk (501) 680-3767 home William Broadnax, Ed,D Student Hearing (501) 447-3582 work (501)407-0817 homo Sharon Cauley, B\u0026lt;ID Assiatant Principal J.A. Fair Systeots Ma,snct High Schoo! (S01)447-1700en 1710 worlc (SOI) 666-Ql6 home Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 24 of 30 Bl Platform Little Rock School District Business Objects Reporting Tools Business Objects Enterprise is a scalable, adaptive platfonn that delivers insight and corporate information to all your end users. With a platform designed to help you confidently deploy and manage your Business Intelligence (BI) implementations, Business Objects provides the Little Rock School District with the extreme insight you need to extend your competitive advantage. The BI Platform provides a set of common seIYices to simplify deployment and management of BI tools, reports, and applications. The reporting system at the Little Rock School District includes infoanation delivery in subject areas including Student Demographics, Student Perfonnance, Budget and Finance, Employee Attendance, Child Nutrition, Human Resources, Accounts Payable, Payroll, Procurement, and Procurement Warehouse, to name a few. Flexible Services-Oriented Platform By building the Little Rock School District's BI solutions with Business Objects Enterprise, we have the flexibility to deploy a solution for a single information challenge, while being able to simultaneously expand the deployment as our needs evolve. Designed for Scalability and H!gll Performance Business Objects Enterprise is designed for scalability, reliability, fault-tolerance, extensibility, and 24n availability. This platfonn recognizes the importance of diverse global deployments, supports Unicode, and is compliant with Microsoft Windows, Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, HP-UX, and Linux. So you can start with a single BI project on one platform, and easily grow to support an enterprise--wide standardization initiative on multiple platfonns. With BI content now being delivered via intranet and extranet. BI platform scalability is a key issue. Business Objcx:ts Enterprise has the scalability you need to accommodate increasing numbers of users, process growing volumes of infonnation. and scale on a single machine-or clusters of machines-while maintaining high performance. Proven RellabUlty This platform's key attributes-performance, reliability, and scalability-are proven by extensive, real world testing and third-party certification. Enterprise is the only BI platform to achieve Microsoft Windows 2003 Datacenter certification. Business Objects Enterprise- covered by a 24/7 technical customer support-has demonstrably installed and run on a 32processor system, remained stable through rigorous stress testing, and stayed available after being subject to extensive failover conditions. We also continually conduct extensive benchmarking and perfonnance testing to ensure our platform -~-~-~-,-~-m_ec_t_th_e_n_eed_s_o_f_th_e_Ll__tt1_e_R_o_ck_S_ch_oo_l D-is_tn_c_t t_o_da_y_an_d-to_m_o_rr_o_w_. __ ,.(_i _ ~EXH-IBIT __ ,,] Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 25 of 30 Reporting Fundamentals The fundamental requirements of any reporting system are a normalized database and a reporting tool. Data from disparate systems and formats is collected in a centralized database platform and transformed into a consistent, well organized reporting database. Many reports have been created and delivered from this reporting database using Crystal Reports as the reporting tool. Normalized Data This data, securely housed at the Little Rock School District Technology Center, has been nonnalized to 3rd nonnal form on a Microsoft SQL Server database server. The original database management software is DB2 residing on an IBM AS/400 application server, which houses a majority of tl!,e studentbased data. Other student data resides in Microsoft Access or is provided to the CIS department via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Automated processes have been developed and scheduled to update the student data nightly, where required. Processes have also been designed and implemented to update data in key financial, human resources and accounting subject areas. Business Objects provides the industry's leading suite of integrated business intelligence products. The products are categorized into three groups: Reporting allows all levels of the Little Rock School District to access, format, and deliver data as meaningful infoIU1ation to large populations of information consumers like teachers and school administrators both inside and outside the organization. This is provided through detailed reports created using Crystal Reports and accessed via a web browser using the Business Objects Enterprise Info View application.  Query and Analysis tools allow end users to interact with District infonnation and answer ad hoc questions, without advanced knowledge of the underlying data sources and structures. This is provided through a product called Web Intelligence or WEBI. This allows users to create dynamic reports from their desks with little or no required knowledge of the underlying database schema. In-depth analysis is performed using OLAP Intelligence, a powerful OnLine Analytic Processing tool that provides detailed, fast, multidimensional data for sophisticated comparative analysis and reporting. Performance Management products help users align with strategy by tracking and analyzing key business and educational metrics and goals via management dashboards, scorecards, and alerting. This is provided through Performance Manager and Dashboard Manager products that present Key Performance Indicators in user-friendly, interactive graphical tools. Crystal Reports A world SUIIldard for enterprise reporting, Crystal Reports is an intuitive reporting solution that helps customers rapidly create flexible, feature-rich, high-fidelity reports and tightly integrate them into web and Windows applications. The Crystal Reports enterprise reporting solution consists of: LRSDBITDOIJ l'll#,11o/7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 26 of 30  Powerful report design: Report authors can use the visual report designer (with a complete set of layout and design controls), to design highly fonnatted, interactive, and professional-looking reports. And they can design within the leading .NET and Java development tools without having to step out of their chosen development environment.  Flexil\u0026gt;le application development: Developers can leverage cross-platform support for Java, .NET, and COM development technologies. HTML is generated directly by Crystal Reports, allowing developers to focus on application business logic, rather than tedious, time-intensive hand coding. Separation of application development and rep_ort design tasks allow developers to focus on application development, while the report authors can focus on report design.  Report management and delivery: Reports are easily published to the web, for better business decisions in all areas of the Little Rock School District Reports can be exported and repurposed to the electronic formats used by most end users (e.g. PDF and Excel). IT can centralize the management of operational reporting while distributing the report authoring function out to departments of the District that need them. The following themes are an overview of what featw-es are available in Crystal Reports XI:  Powerful data access and report design  Enhanced productivity and maintenance  Report management and delivery Dynamic a.nd Cascading Prompts Report prompts can be based on dynamic values. This means that report designers no longer have to maintain static prompt value lists within individual reports. Instead, they can reuse existing prompts stored in the repository. HTML Preview The iterative report design/view process is streamlined, with a new IITML preview that allows report authors to see how reports will look when published to the web. Editable RTF Format This new feature is ideal for report export editing. It delivers reports to end users in a new RTF foxmat, so they can easily make their own document modifications. Report Export Cootlguratioo The report designer can save report export configuration infonnation within the report itself so that the end user forgoes the time and trouble of reconfiguring the export each time a. report is nm. Dependency Checker With the new dependency checker, report authors can quickly .find bro.ken links, formula cnors., and dependency issues. This greatly reduces the time spent on QA. Business Views Speed Report Design and Maintenance Cycles Crystal Enterprise Business Views helps you better manage reporting across multiple data sources and applications by simplifying data access, change management, and data-level security processes. An UfSD Bl TooJ1 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 27 of 30 optional service in Crystal Enterprise, Business Views allow you to integrate data from disparate sources, handle promotion/demotion between development and production environments, and control security at both the row and column level. Simplified Data Access Data access is one of the most fundamental, yet difficult aspects of designing a report. Locating the right data, joining tables appropriately, and filtering the data to focus on a specific subject area requires an indepth knowledge of the underlying data structures. The Business View Manager allows you to simplify data access for your report designers by insulating them from the raw data structures. You can build connections to multiple data sources, join tables, alias field names, create calculated fields, and then surface this simplified structure as a Business View in Crystal Entc:rprise. Your report designers can then connect to Crystal Enterprise and use the Business View as the basis for their report, rather than accessing the data directly and building their own queries. Business Views helps administrators pull data together from disparate sources. Data Connections (created visually or with complex SQL statements) can be integrated into a Data Foundation. Once the Data Foundation is built, Business Elements (a collection of related fields from the Data Foundation) can be created and combined into a Business View. The modular architecture of Business Views also allows you to readily re-use various components of one Business View to build other Business Views. A single, broad data foundation can serve as the basis for multiple, specialized Business Views. Used carefully, these capabilities allow you to minimize the number of changes required to introduce new data, fields, or formulas into your system. Granu1ar Data-level Security Many reporting scenarios involve complex security requirements. Each user is entitled to sec a slightly different slice of District data, based on their School, Department or level of seniority. Data in tho Little Rock School District is commonly segregated by School and Teacher-based information. Business Views allow teachers to view data regarding their students and prevents them form seeing data regarding students that are NOT assigned to them. Rather than creating a number of different reports to meet this need, we can create a single report and use the security features of Business Views to filter data appropriately for each user. Using the Business View Manager, you can set up row- or colwnn-level filters azid map these filters to users or U$Cl' groups stored in your existing LDAP, Active Directory, or Windows authentication provider. This security is then consistently applied at the data level, ensuring that any report design based on a Business View will respect the underlying data security. You can th.en choose to schedule the report to run regularly. Or you oan allow users to refresh it on demazid. Regardless, Crystal EntCIJ)rise can generate a master instance of the report (with all the data included if you run the report wider an administrator context) and then filter the report every time a user views it. All exporting, printing, and report modification requests will' also return only the data the user is entitled 10 see. L1ISD Bl Tools Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 28 of 30 Change Management and Re--use Maintaining a large set of reports is often more time-consuming and complex than new development. Activities such as making small changes in response to user needs, updating business calculations, changing fonnatting. and moving your reports between development and production data sources all delay you from addressing new requirements. Business Views includes two key features to help you spend less time on report maintenance. First, you can use Dynamic Data Connections to store connections to multiple instances qfthc same database (e.g., development, test, and production). By passing a parameter when you're designing (or scheduling) the report, you can select which data source the report runs against. Second, you can store COillIIl?nly-used functions, text objects, and logos directly in your data foundation. This allows you to easily roll changes across multiple reports by changing the object once. Business Objects Enterprise Info View Business Objects Info View is a completely redesigned web interface that enables user to navigate, create, and interact with District information. Integrated search and navigation tools allow users to easily find the infonnation they need. Users can also personalize their interactions to simplify consumption of District infonnation. Info View is built to support Java and Microsoft based web servers, to easily fit within you're the Little Rock School District IT infrastructure. Web Intelligence Many organizations find it difficult to access information not contained in standard reports. And requests to IT for new information simply add to the report backlog. Even when ad hoc query capabiJities are available, they're typically difficult to use and don't provide your non-technical users with a simple method of exploring information, to really understand the business issue at hand. With Business Objects Web Intelligence, both self-service access to information and data analysis are available in one product, helping your users turn educational analysis into effective decisions. Users can create a query from scratch, format the information retrieved, and analyze it to understand underlying trends and root causes. If the full power of query capabilities is not required, users can simply analyze infonnation in existing reports-fonnatting and exploring them to meet specific needs. CLAP lntelllgence Business Objects OLAP Intelligence is a powerful and easy-to-use tool that allows you to access and analyze data stored in the leading OLAP servers. It uniquely satisfies the analysis requirements ofboth information analysts (power users) and less sophisticated knowledge workers (business users). With OLAP Intelligence, power users can slice and dice, drill, rank, sort. filter, create calculations on the fly, and perfonn speed-of-thought data exploration. And business users can interact with pre-built OLAP workbooks that contain highly intuitive, graphical views of educational activity, guided navigation and worktlows, and flexible ad hoc analysis. Its advanced analysis capabilities, shared security, aod relational drill-through allow you to standardize on Business Objects for all of your BI needs. OLAP Intelligence delivers:  Best-of-breed ad hoc OLAP  Managed OLAP authoring and distribution  Integration with the market leading, trusted BI platfonn LRSDBfTools Pq,Sofl Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 29 of 30 Best-of-Breed Ad Hoc OLAP The primary driver for implementing an OLAP database is to provide users with fast access to multidimensional data. IT develops focused OLAP cubes to provide users with a structured data environment, optimized for analysis. But in order for users to take advantage of the pre-aggregated data within an OLAP cube, they require an interface that allows them to drill, slice, and dice while leveraging the response times that the predefined OLAP cube environment offers. Speed-of-Thought Analysis OLAP Intelligence provides an intuitive, web-based interface that allows users to select dimensions and members from a query panel as well as perfonn similar analysis from integrated Windows, Microsoft Excel, and ActiveX client interfaces. Users can interact with their data and ask spontaneous questions to uncover trends and identify anomalies. And because OLAP Intelligence takes advantage of the power of the OLAP cube, users are guaranteed speed-of-thought response time. Intuitive, Function-Rich Interface The OLAP Intelligence interface is both intuitive and function-rich. Common functions such as ranking, filtering, highlighting, quick calculations, zero suppression, and axis swapping are available with a single click of the mouse. More advanced analyses are only a few mouse clicks away and provide an uncluttered, intuitive user interface that requires minimal training. With OLAP Intelligence, users can also asymmetrically display data and hide specific dimensions that are irrelevant to data exploration. Deep, Open Access to Microsoft, Hyperion, and SAP OLAP Servers With OLAP Intelligence, you get best-of-breed, ad hoc OLAP for today's leading, multidimensional databa.so servers-Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services, Hyperion Essbase, IDM DB2 OLAP, and SAP BW. For exampl~ native Hyperion Essbase 7.x support for free-fonn calculations and cube actions means that organizations are maximizing their OLAF server investments and taking advantage ofkey enhancements and optimizations. Managed OLAP Authoring and Distribution OLAP Intelligence goes further than most OLAP clients on the market today by not only providing powerful ad hoc analysis, but also delivering a flexible, managed OLAP environment. With OLAP Intelligence, you can easily create sophisticated workbooks that exploit the power of the underlying OLAP scrva, and enable users to build in predefined navigation paths and workflows. Then you can securely deploy and deliver the workbooks live: to business users who don't necessarily fit the powerdata analyst profile. These OLAP work.books may contain custom buttons and multi-page reports that recipients can view and interact with over the web, Publish Live OLAP Workbooks to Business Users When users view an OLAP Intelligence workbook over the web, it may appear as a dashboard with custom functionality specific to one area of the business, or as an ad hoc interface that allows them to perform advanced analysis. Because OLAP Intelligence has a flexible design and was created to meet powerful ad hoc and managed analysis needs, the deployment possibilities are limitless. Built-In Guided Navigation and Data Exploration UISD Bl T* Pq16of7 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4055-1 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 30 of 30 With OLAP Intelligence you can guide users through the OLAP data navigation and exploration process. For example, a user can highlight a group of cells in a report, click a custom analysis button, and view a new graph that has drilled down on the chosen group, displaying variances as a worksheet and chart. A show trend analysis button could then be ma.de available that displays a new page in the workbook with a year-over-year comparison. Open drill-through capabilities in OLAP Intelligence empower users to drill from aggregated OLAP data down to relational details. This means that users can navigate and explore-summarized infonnation, and drill through and pass context to more detailed Crystal Reports or Business Objects Web Intelligence documents. This contextual drill-through technology provides users with intelligent navigation without the need to understand the complexities of underlying data and metadata structures. J.IISD8/Toou Pqa7o/7\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1449","title":"Report: ''Update of the Status of the Pulaski County Special School District's Implementation of Plan 2000,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2006-08-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational innovations","Educational statistics","School buildings","School discipline","School facilities","School improvement programs","School management and organization","Student assistance programs","Student expulsion"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Update of the Status of the Pulaski County Special School District's Implementation of Plan 2000,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1449"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["105 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_841","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2006-07/2006-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/841"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n. , BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA RECEIVED JUL l 7 2006 OFROCFE DESEGREMGAOTKIOITNO RINI ass e North Little Rock School District Thursday, July 20, 2006 5:00 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Marty Moore, President II. INVOCATION, Cecil Gibson, Argenta Academy Instructional Aide III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Dorothy Williams, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS None VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, June 15, 2006 5:00 P.M. (Regular)-Page A- 1 B. Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:30 P.M. (Special) -Page A- 6 C. Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:30 P.M. (Special)-Page A- 9 VTI. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS Page 2 - Board Agenda July 20, 2006 A. Consider Arkansas School Boards Association Membership - K. Kirspel - Page B - 1 B. Consider 2006-2007 Proposed Budget ofExpenditures- K. Kirspel - Page C- 1 C. Consider Budget Workshop Date - K. Kirspel D. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - I 3. Consider bid items - Page R- 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - I IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Thursday, August 17, 2006- 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES June 15, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a regular session on Thursday, June 15, 2006 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. There were no public comments. President Marty Moore called the meeting to order at 5 :00 p.m. Shara Brazear, Communications Specialist, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Absent Dorothy Williams, Member Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS - TV (video) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS None. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the minutes of the May 18, 2006 as printed. John Riley seconded the motion. A-l YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report No Report from Certified Personnel Policies Committee. Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report Glenda Tucker presented their report with nineteen (19) new proposals at this time. Eight (8) of the policies are to add nothing to the policies but to add the CL to designate them as classified policies. They are CFA (was CFB) -Working Hours for Non -Instructional Staff\nCFJ - Payment of Debts\nCFK - Citizenship Rights/Political Activities\nCFR - Tobacco Use By Employees\nCFSB - Employee Substance Abuse\nCGA - Grievance Procedures\nCGB - Solicitations\nand CGD - Directory Information. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the eight (8) new policies for the classified staff with no revisions other than adding the CL used to designated as classified policies: CF A (was CFB) -Working Hours for Non - Instructional Staff\nCFJ - Payment of Debts\nCFK - Citizenship Rights/Political Activities\nCFR - Tobacco Use By Employees\nCFSB - - Employee Substance Abuse\nCGA - Grievance Procedures\nCGB - Solicitations\nand CGD - Directory Information. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Mrs. Tucker also presented eleven (11) new policies that need revising and the addition of CL for classified designation. They are: CDB - Teacher Retirement System- First paragraph - to add the words \"new employees\" and remove the words \"certified personnel, instructional aides, and secretariaVclerical staff' and \"either on a contributory or non contributory basis.\" CDC - Public Employees Retirement System - to add \"new\" and \"Contributory\" and \"Teacher\" deleting the words \"custodial, maintenance, transportation, and cafeteria\" and the phrase \"either contributory or non contributory.\"  CDH - Expense Reimbursement - Third paragraph - to add the word \"administrator\" and delete the words \"assistant superintendent.\" CEBA - CL - Extended Leave Without Pay - Second paragraph - adding the words \"building administrator\" in two places and \"District Personnel Officer\" and deleting the A-2 words \"principal\" and \"Director of Personnel\" and in the third paragraph- adding the - words \"District School\" prior to Board of Education. CEH - Vacations - two typographical errors were corrected. CFMB - Discipline of Employees - only CL will be added to this one. No other changes. CFO - Sign In/Out Procedures - adding the words \"Employees\" at the beginning of .the sentence and \"as directed by their supervisor and as required for proper payroll functions\" at the end of the sentence\nto delete the words \"by initialing the attendance roster upon arrival and departure. The posting of the time or the use of a time clock shall not be a part of this procedure.\" CFP - Annual Survey of Job Preference - to add the word \"Personnel\" in the title between Annual and Survey\nand as the second word in the first and second sentences\nand also as the fourth word in the first sentence of the third paragraph. CFSC - Network Appropriate Use - adding the word \"many\" between provides and employees in the first sentence\nand removing the words \"and students.\" Also this would remove all references to students in this policy. CFT - Personal Communications - adding the words \"employee should\" and removing \"teacher shall\"\nadding the word \"work\" and removing the word \"class\". CGC - Gifts - adding the words \"or vendors\" after staff. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept the eleven (11) new policies for the classified staff with revisions as presented and to add the CL used to designated as classified policies: CDB - Teacher Retirement System\nCDC - Public Employees Retirement System\nCDH - Expense Reimbursement\nCEBA - Extended leave Without Pay\nCEH - Vacations\nCFMB - Discipline of Employees\nCFO - Sign In/Out Procedures\nCFP - Annual Personnel Survey of Job Preference\nCFSC - Network Appropriate Use\nCFT - Personal Communications and CGC - Gifts. Rochelle Redus seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Increase in School Lunch Prices Marsha Satterfield, Food Services Director, presented recommendation to the Board to increase the cost of school lunches for elementary students to $1.50 (increase of 10)\nsecondary students to $1.75 (increase of 25)\nand Adultffeachers (increase of 25). A-3- MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to accept the increases as proposed by Administration. Teresa - Burl seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Contract Renewals for Transportation Employees Danny Reed, Director for Personnel and Special Services, presented the list of transportation employees for contract renewals as printed in the agenda. MOTION John Riley moved to accept Administration's recommendation for contract renewals for transportation employees as printed in the agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Student Insurance Proposals Barry Kincl, Director of Finance, Audit and Purchasing, presented the recommendation to use Dwight Jones Insurance for one year coverage for athlete, spirit groups and all sanctioned AAA activities for $26,000. MOTION Trent Cox moved to accept Administrations' recommendation to use Dwight Jones Insurance for insurance for one year for athletes, spirit groups and all AAA sanctioned activities for $26,000. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Special Board Meeting Date Mr. Kirspel explained the bids for roofing and asbestos removal could not be completed until later this month but all must be filed with the State before June 30, 2006. The Board discussed date options. MOTION Teresa Burl moved to have a special Board meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 in the Board Room. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel requested approval of the consent agenda as printed. A-4 MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the consent agenda as presented. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) INFORMATIONAL ITEM John Haynie, Transportation Director, presented to the Board some options to explore concerning the transportation communication system. He explained that technology needs to be utilized to insure the safety of our students. He requested permission from the Board to research more communication tools for the buses in the district. The Board agreed for him to pursue more information and present to the Board at a later date. PERSONNEL HEARING Mr. Reed stated no personnel hearing at this time. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Rochelle Redus moved to adjourn the meeting. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Riley, and Teague None - (Williams - absent) President Moore declared the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Marty Moore, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-5 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES June 27, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 in the Board Room of the Adrriinistration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Marty Moore called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Marty Moore, President John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Dorothy Williams, Member Absent Trent Cox, Vice President Rochelle Redus, Secretary Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. Academic Transitional Facility Bids Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services, explained the new roofs, roof repairs and asbestos abatement bids for Poplar Street Middle, North Heights Elementary, NLRHS East Campus, Lakewood Elementary, NLRHS West Campus Music Building, NLRHS West Campus Creative Arts Building, NLRHS West Campus Science Building, Rose City Middle, Seventh Street Elementary, Lynch Drive Elementary, Ridgeroad Middle Charter, Amboy Elementary, and Crestwood Elementary with the Transitional Academic Facilities Funding. Mr. Massey expla\nn!!d his previous estimates on the bids were considerably lower than the bids due to prices increases for energy costs and the gulf coast States supply demand for repairing from Hurricane Katrina last year. A-6 MOTION Teresa Burl moved to accept the bids as presented and as listed on pages A -1 through A - 6. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Cox and Redus - absent) 2006 - 2007 Student Handbooks Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs, explained the variety of changes on the elementary, middle school and high school levels with the District Suspension form. In compliance with Arkansas Nutrition Standards Regulations and Act 1220 of 2003, all of the handbooks have wellness section explaining the new guidelines for students. After a discussion, the Board also amended the high school handbook to remove the reference on page 13 to \"Vespers\" under the excluded activities while a student is suspended. Vespers is no longer a school - sponsored activity. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the rev1s1ons to the student handbooks as presented by Administration with the Board's amendment (to remove Vespers). Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Cox and Redus - absent) Employment and Transfer of Personnel Mr. Kirspel presented a new employment and a transfer as printed. MOTION John Riley moved to enter into executive session to discuss personnel recommendations. Teresa Burl seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Cox and Redus - absent) The Board entered into an Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. The Board reconvened in Regular Session at 6:55 p.m. MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept Administration's recommendation as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Cox and Redus- absent) A-7 ADJOURNMENT MOTION Dorothy moved to adjourn the meeting. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Cox and Redus - absent) President Moore declared the meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Marty Moore, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-8 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES July 11, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Marty Moore called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Dorothy Williams, Member Absent Rochelle Redus, Secretary Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nGregg Thompson, Administrative Director for Personnel/Special Services\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. Employment and Transfers of Personnel Mr. Kirspel presented the employment and transfers of personnel. MOTION Teresa Burl moved to enter into an executive session. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Redus - absent) The Board entered into an executive session at 5:32 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 6:00 p.m. A-9 MOTION Dorothy Williams moved to accept the Administration's recommendations for the employment and transfers of personnel. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: ADJOURNMENT MOTION Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None (Redus - absent) Trent Cox moved to adjourn the meeting. Dorothy Williams seconded the motion. YEAS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Redus, Teague and Williams NAYS: None (Riley - absent) President Moore declared the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Marty Moore, President Rochelle Redus, Secretary A-10 Arkansas School Boards Association .Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive  Little Rock, AR 72202-3646 (501) 372-1415  Fax (501) 375-2454  1-800-482-1212  www.arsba.org MEMORANDUM June 23, 2006 TO: All Superintendents, Co-op Directors FROM: Kathy McFetridge, ASBA President \u0026amp; Dan Farley, Executive Director RE: 2006-07 ASBA Membership RECEIVED JUN2 8 2006 ASBA's programs and services are outlined in the enclosed flyer, which has been sent to all members. Membership in the association has never been as important. ASBA is here to serve you, your board, and your school district by providing you with all the help it can to make your work a little bit easier. Our mission is to make the brightest possible future for our children through the education we provide them. Working together as a united force, we can improve our schools and better serve our communities. The ASBA Board of Directors approved the current membership fee schedule at its April 20 meeting. Some districts, if they lost students, may see a decrease in their fees\nothers, who gained students, may see a slight increase. The fees area based on the revenues published in the \"Annual Statistical Report of the Public Schools of Arkansas,\" published by the Arkansas Department of Education. The scale consists of 10 brackets and is printed on the enclosed flyer. We look forward to a successful new year of working together to improve the academic achievement and well-being of Arkansas public school students. B - 1 Arkansas School Boards Association 808 Dr. Martin Luther King Drive Little Rock, AR 72202 Telephone: 1-800-482-1212 Bill To North Little Rock School District Kenneth Kirspel, Superintendent P.O. Box687 North Little Rock, AR 72115 Date Event/Item Description 7/1/2006 Membership 2006-07 ASBA Membership Due Upon Receipt Phone# Fax# E-mail Web Site l-800-482-1212 (501) 375-2454 arsba@arsba.org www.arsba.org B - 2 Invoice Date Invoice No. 6/30/2006 4626 P.O. No.: Event/Item ASBA Membership Qty Cost Amount l 1,867.00 1,867.00 Total $1,867.00 Payments/Credits $0.00 Balance Due $1,867.00 PROPOSED BUDGET OF EXPENDITURES TOGETHER WITH TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007 TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 30,-2008 The Board of Directors of the North Little Rock School District No. 1 of Pulaski County, Arkansas, in compliance with the requirements of Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-622 and Amendment No. 40 and No. 74 of the Constitution of the State of Arkansas has prepared, approved and does hereby make public a proposed budget of expenditures for the district in 2007 - 2008 together with a supporting tax rate. The proposed budget of expenditures includes:  Salary Fund Expenditures Instructional Expense Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Expense Pupil Transportation Expense Other Operating Expense Nonbonded Debt Payment Bonded Debt Payment Building Fund Expense $ 45, 000,000 20,515,000 6,800,000 3,670,000 1,380,000 1. 2. 3. 4, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Dedicated M \u0026amp; 0 (Current Expend/Capital Outlay) 420,000 1,548,000 2,000,000 1,600,000 To provide for the foregoing proposed budget of expenditures, the Board of Directors proposes a total tax rate (state and local) of 40.9 mills on the dollar of the assessed value of taxable property located in this School District. The proposed tax includes the uniform rate of 25.0 mills (the \"Statewide Uniform Rate\") to be collected on all taxable property in the State and remitted to the State Treasurer pursuant to Amendment No. 74 to the Arkansas Constitution to be used solely for maintenance and operation of schools in the State. As provided in Amendment No. 74, the Statewide Uniform Rate replaces a portion of the existing rate of tax levied by this School District and available for maintenance and operation of schools in this District. This total tax levy includes 28. 7 mills for maintenance and operation of school\n2.9 mills for dedicated maintenance and operation Millage (formerly current expenditure/capital outlay) dedicated for the purpose of purchasing school buses, purchasing furniture and equipment to support instructional programs, purchasing computer software, and renovating, repairing and equipping existing facilities\nand 9.3 mills for debt service previously voted as a continuing levy and pledged for retirement of existing bonded indebtedness. Surplus revenues produced each year by debt service Millage may be used by the District for other school purposes. This request represents no increase in the total tax from the previous year. Given this 20th day of July 2006 North Little Rock School District No. 1 of Pulaski County, Arkansas C - 1 Marty Moore Presidl\\t t of Board Rochelle Redus Secretary of Board I North Little Rock School District Local Revenue Current Taxes Pullback Delinquent Taxes Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue Revenue From Intermediate Source !Severance Tax Revenue from State Sources-Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding 0th Unrestr Grants-in-Aid Revenue from State Sources-Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Misc State estate NUE OPERATIONS d eotal Revenu TOTAL REVE Building Fun Capital Outla Food Service Federal Revenue y ATOTALFEDE 9J\"OTALREVE s Unrestricted-PL 874 Title I-B-4 ROTC Satellite Ed Research Erner Impact Aid Pgm Title I Title V-A Innovative Pgm Homeless Assistance Carl Perkins - Vocational Title 11-D Formula Grant Title VI -B Head Start Special Ed Preschool Medicaid Eisenhower Math/Science Title Ill - Eng Lang Acq Title IV-A Safe \u0026amp; Drug Free Comprehensive Sch Health Accountability RAL REVENUE NUE JUNE 2006 2005-2006 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $13,735,000.00 $0.00 $12,078,615.58 $6,530,000.00 $735,280.65 $6,178,911.28 $1,410,000.00 $64,374.78 $1,283,498.74 $150,000.00 $0.00 $311,991.32 $181,000.00 $15,866.64 $195,615.08 $42,000.00 $5,853.28 $68,216.66 $102,500.00 $57,433.23 $121,487.75 $360,000.00 $118,080.44 $899,347.46 $90,000.00 $8,324.64 $82,464.26 $819,990.00 $14,102.19 $108,279.96 $23,420,490.00 $1,019,315.85 $21,328,428.09 $13,000.00! $0.00! $8,004.97! $33,414,099.00 $3,409,249.00 $34,528,908.00 $0.00 $416,691.00 $829,872.00 $9,000.00 $0.00 $1,750.00 $499,745.00 $0.00 $536,057.74 $4,866,499.00 $497,020.00 $4,680,512.00 $2,155,150.00 $0.00 $2,256,650.00 $4,825,000.00 $713,700.45 $6,737,033.84 $1,805,435.00 $5,425.00 $1,284,662.66 $136,000.00 $5,508.77 $48,788.39 $47,710,928.00 $5,047,594.22 $50,904,234.63 $71,144,418.00 $6,066,910.07 $72,240,667.69 $46,000.00 $98,817.41 $239,511.43 $1,523,253.00 $79,209.84 $1,512,090.74 $3,213,000.00 $326,242.10 $3,598,362.86 $2,500.00 $64,717.00 $64,717.00 $65,549.00 $0.00 $0.00 $120,000.00 $9,066.59 $92,639.79 $180,000.00 $0.00 $180,000.00 $0.00 $229,261.00 $313,011.00 $3,175,702.00 $1,408,961.00 $3,175,702.00 $276,426.00 $0.00 $380,906.00 $180,000.00 $0.00 $183,000.00 $202,587.00 $6,127.00 $202,587.00 $58,407.00 $0.00 $58,407.00 $1,871,018.00 $0.00 $2,098,268.00 $705,491.00 $0.00 $494,241.00 $361,000.00 $54,353.54 $473,574.24 $610,000.00 $0.00 $982,010.00 $16,976.00 $16,542.00 $16,542.00 $73,706.00 $0.00 $73,706.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 $65,000.00 $0.00 $19,834.83 $7,964,362.00 $1,789,028.13 $8,854,145.86 $83,891,033.00 $8,360,207.55 $86,444,778.58 0-1 YTD Budget Balance Actual/Bud $1,656,384.42 87.94% $351,088.72 94.62% $126,501.26 91.03% -$161,991.32 207.99% -$14,615.08 108.07% -$26,216.66 162.42% -$18,987.75 118.52% -$539,347.46 249.82% $7,535.74 91.63% $711,710.04 13.21% $2,092,061.91 91.07% $4,995.03! 61.58%! -$1,114,809.00 103.34% -$829,872.00 $7,250.00 19.44% -$36,312.74 107.27% $185,987.00 96.18% -$101,500.00 104.71% -$1,912,033.84 139.63% $520,772.34 71.16% $87,211.61 35.87% -$3, 193,306.63 106.69% -$1,096,249.69 101.54% -$193,511.43 520.68% $11,162.26 99.27% -$385,362.86 111.99% -$62,217.00 2588.68% $65,549.00 0.00% $27,360.21 77.20% $0.00 100.00% -$313,011.00 $0.00 100.00% -$104,480.00 137.80% -$3,000.00 101.67% $0.00 100.00% $0.00 100.00% -$227,250.00 112.15% $211,250.00 70.06% -$112,574.24 131.18% -$372,010.00 160.99% $434.00 97.44% $0.00 100.00% -$45,000.00 $45,165.17 30.52% -$889, 783.86 111.17% -$2,553, 7 45.58 103.04% Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOTAL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof ff ech Services Purchased Property Services Other Purchased Services Supplies and Materials Property Other Objects Other Uses of Funds Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND BUILDING FUND FEDERAL FUND FOOD SERVICE FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES North Little Rock School District JUNE 2006 2005-2006 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $34,874,548.00 $6,672,296.66 $36,954,715.16 $10,107,052.41 $2,016,823.29 $9,728,580.42 $10,422,770.60 $1,435,956.94 $10,300,991.69 $3,857,441.17 $590,622.18 $3,683,491.20 $59,261,812.18 $10,715,699.07 $60,667,778.47 $977,902.19 $96,466.15 $1,093,359.44 $979,384.54 $122,806.91 $948,306.55 $2,537,508.99 $200,604.04 $2,633,381.52 $4,669,020.15 $388,528.65 $4,184,872.52 $274,292.00 $158,752.90 $392,215.11 $1,005,410.84 $3,621.38 $648,288.70 $700,207.00 $0.00 $353,202.73 $11,143,725.71 $970,780.03 $10,253,626.57 $70,405,537.89 $11,686,479.10 $70,921,405.04 $1,599,207.00 $91,525.52 $1,228,772.42 $1,676,206.00 $16,267.00 $16,267.00 $9,635,909.95 $1,819,860.97 $6,605,237.43 $2,942,736.00 $345,578.47 $3,375,426.56 $86,259,596.84 $13,959,711.06 $82,147,108.45 0-2 %Yid Budget Balance Actual/Bud -$2,080,167.16 105.96% $378,471.99 96.26% $121,778.91 98.83% $173,949.97 95.49% -$1,405,966.29 102.37% -$115,457.25 111.81% $31,077.99 96.83% -$95,872.53 103.78% $484,147.63 89.63% -$117,923.11 142.99% $357,122.14 64.48% $347,004.27 50.44% $890,099.14 92.01% -$515,867 .15 100.73% $370,434.58 76.84% $1,659,939.00 0.97% $3,030,672.52 68.55% -$432,690.56 114.70% $4,112,488.39 95.23% Function Category 11 XX Reqular Proqrams-Elem/Sec 12XX Special Education 13XX Workforce Education 15XX Comoensatorv Education 19XX Other Instructional 21XX Support Services-Students 22XX Suport Services-Instruction 23XX SuPPort Services-Administration 24XX Support Services-Sch Admin 25XX Suooort Services-Business 26XX M \u0026amp; 0 Plant Services 27XX Pupil Transportation 28XX Support Services-Central 29XX Other Support Services 31XX Food Services 33XX Community Service Operations 34XX Other Non-Instr Services 43XX Site Improvement Services 44XX Arch/Eng Services 46XX Bldg Acq/Constr Services ?XX Building Improvements 51XX LEA Indebtedness 53XX Payment to other LEA 55XX Indirect CosUAdmin Charqes GRAND TOTAL North Little Rock School District FUNCTION - JUNE 2006 2005-2006 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $27,427,290.72 $5,874,594.88 $29,057,768.43 $9,477,206.00 $1,914,420.13 $9,339,226.95 $2,077,304.00 $256,952.14 $1,750,248.05 $3,857,957.00 $1,065,344.82 $3,197,616.53 $3,200,050.51 $503,779.05 $3,180,613.18 $7,141,053.00 $1,112,614.53 $6,064,280.33 $5,587,492.92 $771,897.13 $4,948,728.89 $1,092,984.39 $81,191.02 $1,033,283.09  $4,337,794.80 $526,815.81 $4,330,008.98 $673,014.00 $49,311.92 $693,056.30 $6,521,692.50 $821,183.27 $6,598,121.37 $4,141,782.00 $314,442.24 $3,458,828.76 $1,494,281.00 $98,213.43 $1,386,114.56 $456,555.00 $35,450.43 $506,222.15 $3,615,511.00 $411,705.50 $4,031,855.69 $71,841.00 $30,444.18 $47,238.31 $68,243.00 $12,394.45 $120,078.09 $0.00 $16,267.00 $21,562.00 $0.00 $0.00 $195,000.00 $45,500.00 $0.00 $1,815.00 $1,676,206.00 $32,850.00 $42,112.00 $1,889,564.00 $29,839.13 $1,018,649.03 $1,270,000.00 $0.00 $1,124,680.76 $136,274.00 $0.00 $0.00 $86,259,596.84 $13,959,711.06 $82,147,108.45 0-3 %Ytd Budget Balance Actual/Bud -$1,630,477.71 105.94% $137,979.05 98.54% $327,,055.95 84.26% $660,340.47 82.88% $19,437.33 99.39% $1,076,772.67 84.92% $638,764.03 88.57% $59,701.30 94.54% $7,785.82 99.82% -$20,042.30 102.98% -$76,428.87 101.17% $682,953.24 83.51% $108,166.44 92.76% -$49,667.15 110.88% -$416,344.69 111.52% $24,602.69 65.75% -$51,835.09 175.96% -$21,562.00 -$195,000.00 $43,685.00 3.99% $1,634,094.00 2.51% $870,914.97 53.91% $145,319.24 88.56% $136,274.00 0.00% $4,112,488.39 95.23% North Little Rock School District SOURCE OF FUNDS  JUNE 2006 ' Current Month Ytd Source of Funds Category Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Actual/Bud 000 Non-categorical $67,849,075.08 $10,406,372.64 $66,526,589.02 $1,322,486.06 98.05% 003 Extended Day Programs $0.00 $2,413.42 $28,037.09 -$28,037.09 020 Alternative-Local $7,047.00 $50.55 $1,388.78 $5,658.22 19.71 ' 045 Summer School $58,375.00 $41,717.44 $68,435.69 -$10,060.69 117.23% 050 Camp Robinson Work Pgm $44,000.00 $1,980.39 $19,966.81 $24,033.19 45.38% 053 GIT Summer Quest $25,350.00 $25,532.18 $25,813.19 -$463.19 101.83% 055 Soft Drink Sales $207,352.31 $28,917.78 $127,029.77 $80,322.54 61.26% 066 Teachers of Tomorrow $0.00 $0.00 $525.00 -$525.00 075 Arkansas Arts Council $0.00 $0.00 $360.00 -$360.00 077 Walton Family Foundation $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 083 Ark Heritage/Wildwood $640.00 $0.00 $640.00 $0.00 100.00% 090 Yale 21st Century $25,ooo.od $3,266.17 $21,259.04 $3,740.96 85.04% 095 ADE Gates Grant $4,283.15 $0.00 $0.00 $4,283.15 0.00% 199 Summer Pre-K Program $0.00 $13,002.79 $13,002.79 -$13,002.79 213 Intensive School Improvement $9,000.00 $0.00 $3,990.36 $5,009.64 44.34% 223 Prof Development Act 59 $521,961.22 $45,255.49 $371,906.29 $150,054.93 71.25% 225 Technology Grant $1,724.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,724.00 0.00% 227 CPEP $71,710.00 $24,242.92 $42,824.81 $28,885.19 59.72% 245 Pathwise Mentoring $63,969.00 $37,670.48 $120,247.64 -$56,278.64 187.98% 250 Act 591 Residential $73,000.00 $9,300.00 $45,950.00 $27,050.00 62.95% 260 Early Childhood Sp Ed $729,627.00 $123,053.66 $757,146.04 -$27,519.04 103.77% 271 GfT Advance Placement $4,000.78 $0.00 $204.00 $3,796.78 5.10% 275 Alternative Leaming Environment $1,290,745.00 $236,719.19 $1,248,746.91 $41,998.09 96.75% 276 English Lang Learners $68,973.00 $7,506.63 $67,057.24 $1,915.76 97.22% 281 NSLA $2,710,070.00 $525,827.04 $2,893,899.17 -$183,829.17 106.78% 340 Workforce Start-up $28,090.00 $0.00 $577.65 $27,512.35 2.06% 365 ABC Preschool $2,198,770.08 $478,450.40 $2,243,853.94 -$45,083.86 102.05% 381 Smart Start Literacy $80,619.00 $4,384.27 $78,898.73 $1,720.27 97.87% - 392 General Facility Funding $564,409.00 $72,887.25 $585,853.26 -$21,444.26 103.80% 398 DHS Preschool Improvement $10,711.27 $2,182.40 $3,550.80 $7,160.47 33.15% 406 Academic Fae lmmed Repair $0.00 $49,117.00 $244,117.00 -$244,117.00 406 lmprv Lit Thru Libraries $0.00 $2,390.05 $61,044.81 -$61,044.81 430 ROTC $120,000.00 $16,995.18 $122,868.49 -$2,868.49 102.39% 441 Title IV-B 21st Century $242,547.76 $34,549.40 $271,087.56 -$28,539.80 111.77% 501 Title I-Reg Comp Ed $4,490,638.39 $638,721.48 $2,223,633.21 $2,267,005.18 49.52% 504 Title I Program Improvement $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 520 Title V-A Innovative Program $344,251.00 $251,091.06 $259,167.98 $85,083.02 75.28% 523 Title I Reading First $234,444.00 $168,142.52 $351,792.59 -$117,348.59 150.05% 530 Homeless-Stewart McKinney $19,209.00 $1,428.82 $12,483.92 $6,725.08 64.99% 535 Title V-B Charter Schools $131,053.54 $400.00 $80,311.64 $50,741.90 61.28% 565 Teacher Quality Enhancement $0.00 $15,317.36 $70,632.51 -$70,632.51 570 Carl Perkins Vocational $196,114.00 $67,751.92 $203,114.73 -$7,000.73 103.57% 595 Title 11-DE d Technology I $61,493.95 $58,071.70 $58,071.70 $3,422.25 94.43% 702 Title VI-B PL 94-142 I $1,780,741.00 $247,131.68 $1,332,208.55 $448,532.45 74.81% 703 Title VI-B Head Start $89,910.00 $15,130.90 $83,118.11 $6,791.89 92.45% 710 Sp Ed Preschool Sec 619 $823,280.00 $136,258.28 $712,194.37 $111,085.63 86.51% 720 Title VI-B Sliver Gr.:: ,t $99,254.00 $0.00 $0.00 $99,254.00 0.00% 750 Medicaid $288,382.00 $19,154.21 $163,702.42 $124,679.58 56.77% 751 Medicaid Sp Ed Preschool $60,000.00 $7,197.99 $47,713.18 $12,286.82 79.52% 756 Title II-A Improve Teaching $534,343.31 $92,394.99 $407,461.83 $126,881.48 76.25% 761 Title Ill Eng Lang Acqui $11,662.00 $0.00 $13,969.72 -$2,307.72 119.79% 781 Title IV-A Drug Ed $73,586.00 $19,653.90 $75,075.95 -$1,489.95 102.02% 785 Comprehensive Sch Health $24,837.40 $28,674.99 -$28,674.99 - 796 Workforce Investment Act $35,000.00 $3,242.13 $26,909.17 $8,090.83 76.88% GRAND TOTAL $86,259,596.84 $13,959,711.06 $82,147,108.45 $4,137,303.39 95.23% 0-4 $80,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 $50,000,000.00 $40,000,000.00 $30,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 NLRSD Actual to Budget Comparison As of June, 2006 Operating Building Capital Outlay Funds 0-5 Federal Food Service !.!Budget LI Expenses NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Board Agenda - July 20, 2006 ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS June Haynie Penny Elliott NAME: Administration, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Effective 7 /14/06 NEW ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Rose City Middle School, Principal Effective 7 /24/06, Category I, Step 10, 252 days NEW ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS Penny Elliott PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Rose City Middle School, Principal EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: BS- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/81 MA - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/90 Nevada-English 7-12, Speech \u0026amp; Drama, School Administrator K-12 Arkansas License pending reciprocity Chaparral High School, Las Vegas, NV - Principal, 2003 - 2006 Orr Middle School, Las Vegas, NV - Principal, 2001 - 2003 Cimarron-Memorial High School, Las Vegas, NV - Asst. Principal 1999-2001 Cimarron-Memorial High School, Las Vegas, NV - Administrative Dean 1997 - 1999 Cimarron-Memorial High School, Las Vegas, NV - English Teacher, 1991 - 1997 Oak Grove High School, North Little Rock, AR - English/ Theatre Teacher 1982 - 1991 Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Ken Kirspel, Superintendent of Schools CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS Kathy Arnold Sara Berryman Lori Brainerd Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Math Specialist Effective 6/14/06 Seventh Street Elementary, Reading Recovery Effective 7 /3/06 NLRHS East Campus, Special Education/Cheer Sponsor Effective 8/1/06 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS CONTINUED Karen Cobb Natalie Cope Rebecca Davis Whitney Fletcher Melanie Gilliam Anita Gray Cathie Huey Cassandra Jones Patrick Kirwin Anna Lowrance Patrick Miller Nancy Moore Jennifer Park Betty Powell Amber Runsick Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Social Studies Effective 8/13/06 Seventh Street Elementary, First Grade Effective 5/30/06 Amboy Elementary, Third Grade Effective 8/12/06 NLRHS East Campus, Clinical Counselor Effective 6/20/06 Amboy Elementary, Second Grade Effective 8/1/06 Indian Hills Elementary, Kindergarten Effective 6/22/06 Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, English Effective 5/30/06 Boone Park Elementary, First Grade Effective 8/7 /06 Lakewood Middle School, English/Social Studies/Math Effective 5/30/06 Redwood Early Childhood Center, Pre-Kindergarten Effective 8/14/06 Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Math Effective 7 /10/06 Poplar Street Middle School, Special Education Effective 5/30/06 NLRHS East Campus, F ACS/Keystone Effective 6/30/06 NLRHS West Campus, French III \u0026amp; IV .38 FTE Effective 5/30/06 Belwood Elementary, Media Specialist .50 FTE Effective 8/1/06 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS AND RETIREMENTS CONTINUED Amanda Symancyk Paul Taylor Amboy/Meadow Park Elementary, Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Facilitator Effective 8/1/06 NLRHS East Campus, Band Director Effective 7/12/06 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES Ruba Abdin From Amboy Elementary, Kindergarten To Amboy Elementary, Pre-Kindergarten Honnye Athanasiou ---- From Argenta Academy, Special Education To Lakewood Middle School, Special Education Michelle Baggett From Lynch Drive Elementary, Kindergarten To Crestwood Elementary, First Grade Mindi Disterdick From Lynch Drive Elementary, Second Grade To Lynch Drive Elementary, Special Education Suzanne Gilliam From Park Hill Elementary, ALE Classroom To Park Hill Elementary, Special Education Resource Nancy Greene From Special Services - Annex, Speech Therapist To Seventh Street Elementary, Speech Therapist Carolyn Hanks From Lynch Drive Elementary, Math Coach To Crestwood Elementary, Fifth Grade Gwen Hammonds From Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Social Studies To NLRHS West Campus, Social Studies Cindy Lann From Indian Hills Elementary, Third Grade To Park Hill Elementary, Math Coach Deanna Mann From Amboy Elementary, Fifth Grade To Amboy Elementary, Math Coach Carrie Manning From Boone Park Elementary, Fifth Grade To Boone Park Elementary, Math Coach Denise Maxam From Amboy Elementary, Pre-Kindergarten To Amboy Elementary, Fifth Grade -P-3 CERTIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES CONTINUED Sara McAlister From Belwood Elementary, Special Education To Lakewood Middle School, Special Education Joy Nichols From Lakewood Middle School, Special Education To Argenta Academy, Special Education Lynda Sisco From NLRHS West Campus, Special Education To Special Services -Annex, Special Education Hearing Impaired Vicki Steadman From North Heights/Boone Park Elementary, Special Education To North Heights Elementary, Literacy Coach Eric Waldorf From North Heights Elementary, Second Grade To North Heights Elementary, Math Coach Joanie Walker From Amboy Elementary, Reading First Coach To Lynch Drive Elementary, Reading First Coach Melanie Wooldridge ---- From Lynch Drive Elementary, Second Grade To Indian Hills Elementary, Second Grade Susan Bruton Amy Buehlig Mindy Carroll Holly Crossman Raymond Girdler Arline Hemphill Hannah Hill NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL Unassigned Elementary Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Special Services Department, Speech Language Pathologist Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 4, 190 days Tri-District Early Childhood, Speech Pathologist Effective 8/7/06, Category IV, Step 1,200 days Lakewood Middle School, PE/Health/ Athletics Effective 7 /31/06, Category I, Step 0, 200 days Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Math Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Lynch Drive Elementary, Kindergarten Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Lynch Drive Elementary, Second Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 2, 190 days P-4 - Matthew How Robin Johnson Araceli Johnston Rachel Jouvenaux Bruce Maddox Porsha Martin Angela McAlpin - Kelly Meyer Julie Mobley Marybeth Norcross Trinina Norris Megan Page Barrett Petty Tanya Phillips Tabitha Radford NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED North Heights Elementary, Fifth Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category, IV, Step 9, 190 days Boone Park Elementary/North Heights Elementary, Special Education Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NLRHS West Campus, Spanish Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 2, 190 days Glenview Elementary, Special Education Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NLRHS West Campus, Secondary Math Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 2, 190 days Meadow Park Elementary, Kindergarten Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Belwood Elementary, Special Education Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 12, 190 days Indian Hills Elementary, Third Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 6, 190 days Lakewood Elementary, Fifth Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 18, 190 days Poplar Street Middle School, Language Arts/Social Studies Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Boone Park Elementary, Fifth Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Amboy Elementary, Third Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 2, 190 days NLRHS East Campus, Math Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days NLRHS East Campus, Criminal Justice Teacher Effective 8/18/06, Category IV, Step 5, 195 days Special Services, Speech Language Pathology Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 2, 190 days P-5 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL CONTINUED Barbara Rhodes NLRHS West Campus, Art Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category VI, Step 21, 190 days Leslie Riddick Unassigned Elementary Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 5, 190 days Randi Riggs Amboy Elementary, Second Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days ' Rhonda Rook Amboy Elementary, Literacy Coach Effective 8/14/06, Category VI, Step 20, 190 days Anna Sanders Meadow Park Elementary, Fifth Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category V, Step 10, 190 days Erica Smith Unassigned Elementary Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 0, 190 days Jessica Spaeth NLRHS West Campus, Spanish Teacher Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 1, 190 days Gena Sparks Poplar Street Middle School, Special Education - Effective 8/14/06, Category I, Step 6, 190 days Gladys Swift Lakewood Middle School, Special Education Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 0, 190 days Lindy Thompson Tri-District Early Childhood, Special Education Effective 8/14/06, Category II, Step 17, 190 days Sophia Vega North Heights Elementary, Second Grade Effective 8/14/06, Category IV, Step 2, 190 days NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION: Susan M. Bruton Unassigned, Elementary Teacher BSE -UALR, Little Rock, AR 5/06 Early Childhood P-4 Redwood Early Childhood Center, North Little Rock, AR 8/05 - 3/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel -P-6 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION AmyBuehlig Special Services Department, Speech Language Pathologist BSE - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/99 MSE- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/02 Speech Language Pathologist P-12 NW AESC Early Childhood Program, Farmington, AR 10/03 - 6/05 Richardson Center, Fayetteville, AR 05/03 - 10-03 Meyer Pediatric Therapy Services, Rogers, AR 5/02 - 5/03 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Mindy E. Carroll Tri-District Early Childhood, Occupational Therapist BS - University of Central Arkansas, 12/03 MS - University of Central Arkansas, 8/05 State of Arkansas, Medical Board, Occupational Therapist ACCESS Schools, Little Rock, AR 8/05 - 8/06 Thelma Jasper, Coordinator Tri-District Early Childhood Program Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of ,Personnel Holly Crossman Lakewood Middle School, PE/Health/ Athletics BA- Lyon College, Batesville, AR 05/03 Non-Traditional Provisional License Pending Non-Traditional Licensure Program Dr. Ginger Wallace, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Raymond Girdler Ridgeroad Middle Charter School, Secondary Math BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/06 Secondary Math 7-12 Vilonia Junior High School, Vilonia, AR 8/04 - 12/04 Conway J-Jigh School East, Conway, AR 1/05 -5/05 June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel -P-7 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION Arline Hemphill Lynch Drive Elementary, Kindergarten BSE - University of Arkansas Little Rock, AR 5/06 Early Childhood Education P-4 Lakewood Elementary, North Little Rock, AR 8/05 -3/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel ' Hannah Hill Lynch Drive Elementary, Second Grade BSE - Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, AL 4/04 License Pending Reciprocity Gadsden City Schools, Gadsden, AL 8/04 - 5/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Matthew How North Heights Elementary, Fifth Grade BA- University of California, Los Angeles, CA 12/97 M.Ed- National University, Los Angeles, CA 01/02 Early Childhood Education P-5\nGrades 5-6 Endorsement\nESL P-8 and ESL 7-12 Chino Valley Unified Schools, Chino, CA 8/03 -6/06 Pasadena Unified Schools, Pasadena, CA 9/02 - 6/03 Chino Hills Christian Schools, Chino Hills, CA 9/98 - 6/02 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Robin Johnson Boone Park/North Heights Elementary, Special Education BSE -Arkansas State University, Beebe, AR 5/06 Early Childhood Education P-4\nALP for Special Education McRae Elementary, McRae, AR 1/06- 5/06 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Araceli Johnston NLRHS West Campus, Spanish University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/93 Spanish P-8 and Spanish 7-12 Academics Plus Charter School, Maumelle, AR 8/04 - 8/06 June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-8 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION Rachel Jouvenaux Glenview Elementary, Special Education BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/06 Initial License Pending Mayflower Elementary, Mayflower, AR 3/06 - 6/06 Ida Burns Elementary, Conway, AR 11/05 - 3/06 Easter Seals Preschool, Little Rock, AR 9/05 - 10/05 Mayflower Elementary, 1/05 -4/05 Cabot Central Elementary, 9/04- 12/04 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Bruce Maddox NLRHS West Campus, Secondary Math BA - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/86 MA- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 3/96 Secondary Math 7-12 Des Arc High School, Des Arc, AR 8/04 - 6/06 June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Porscha Martin Meadow Park Elementary, Kindergarten BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/06 Initial Licensure Pending Florence Mattison International Elementary, Conway, AR 1/06- 5/06 Ida Burns Elementary, Conway, AR 9/05 -12/05 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Angela McAlpin Belwood Elementary, Special Education BSE - University of Arkansas, Monticello, AR 12/03 Early Childhood Education P-4\nALP for Special Education Jacksonville Middle School, Jacksonville, AR 12/03 - 5/05 Mayflower Elementary, Mayflower, AR 08/05 - 05/06 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel -P-9 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION Kelly Meyer Indian Hills Elementary, Third Grade BSE - University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 5/00 License Pending Reciprocity Wilderness Oak Elementary, San Antonio, TX 8/05 - 5/06 Redland Oaks Elementary, San Antonio, TX 8/04 - 5/05 Cody Elementary School, San Antonio, TX 8/00 - 5/04 Sheryll Smith, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Jenna Mobley Amboy Elementary, Kindergarten BSE - Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 8/06 Initial License Pending Fox Meadow Elementary, Jonesboro, AR 1/06-5/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Julie Mobley Lakewood Elementary, Fifth Grade BSE -Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 5/84 MSE -Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 5/97 Elementary 1-6\nMiddle School English 5-8 Piggott School District, Piggott, AR 8/84 - 6/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Marybeth Norcross Poplar Street Middle School, Language Arts/Social Studies BA - University of California, Davis, CA 6/83 Provisional Middle Level Education - Math, English, Science And Social Studies 4-8 Non-Traditional Licensure Program Bill Bowers, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Directo .. n,f Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel -P-10 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION Tranina Norris Boone Park Elementary, Fifth Grade BSE - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/05 Middle Level Education - Math, English, Science, and Social Studies 4-8 Ruth Doyle Intermediate, Conway, AR 8/04-12/05 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Megan Page Amboy Elementary, Third Grade BSE- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 12/03 Early Childhood Education P-4 Lincoln Consolidated School District, Lincoln, AR 8/04 - 6/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Barrett Wade McCoy Petty NLRHS East Campus, Math BA - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/03 Non-Traditional Provisional License Pending Non-Traditional Licensure Program D. Lee Tackett, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Tanya Phillips NLRHS East Campus, Criminal Justice BA- Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 12/98 MA- University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 04/01 Special Education Instructional Specialist P-4, Special Education Instructional Specialist 4-12\nCriminal Justice endorsement pending Little Rock School District, Little Rock, AR 08/05 - 06/06 D. Lee Tackett, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Tabitha Radford Special Services DepartrnPnt, Speech Language Pathologist BS - University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/02 MA - University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, 5/04 Licensed Speech Therapist, ADE License Pending Allied Therapy, Ward, AR 8/04- 7/06 Developmental Therapy, Little Rock, AR 7/04- 12/04 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-11 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Barbara Rhodes NLRHS West Campus, Art BSE - University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/69 MSE - University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/03 Art P-8\nArt 7-12 Pulaski County Special School District, Little Rock, AR 8/77 - 6/06 Oak Grove High School, No. Little Rock, AR 9/70 - 6/72 Glen Junior High, Winston Salem, NC 8/69 - 1/70 June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Leslie Riddick Unassigned Elementary Teacher BSE- Union University, Jackson, TN 5/01 MSE-Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO12/05 License Pending Reciprocity Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Randi Riggs Amboy Elementary, Second Grade BSE- University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 12/05 Early Childhood Education P-4 Magness Creek Elementary, Cabot, AR 8/05 - 12/05 Marguerite Vann Elementary, Conway, AR 1/05 -5/05 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Rhonda Rook Amboy Elementary, Literacy Coach BSE- Southern State College, Magnolia, AR 5/75 MSE- Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 8/78 Elementary Principal K-9\nEarly Childhood Education P-4\nElementary Education K-6\nReading Specialist P-8 Sheridan School District, Sheridan, AR 705 - 6/06 Hope School District, Hope, AR 7 /03 - 6/05 North Little Rock School District, No. Little Rock, AR 7/01-6/03 Dawson Education Services Cooperative, Arkadelphia, AR 7 /99 - 6/00 Arkansas Better Chance Program, Little Roel.:: AR 1/98 - 6/99 William Jefferson Clinton Primary School, Hope, AR 8/95 - 1/98 Edith Brown Elementary School, Hope, AR 8/89 - 9-92 Yerger Middle School, Hope, AR 8/84 - 8/89 McRae Elementary School, McRae, AR 8/77 - 8/84 Fairview Kindergarten, El Dorado, AR 8/75 -8/77 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel -P-12 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: STUDENT TEACHING: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Anna Sanders Meadow Park Elementary, Fifth Grade BA - Hendrix College, Arkadelphia, AR 5/96 M.Ed. - University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 5/99 Elementary Principal K-9\nMiddle School Social Studies 5-8\nElementary 1-6 Our Lady of Good Counsel, Little Rock, AR 8/97 - 6/06 FACT, Inc. El Dorado, AR 8/96-5/97 Rosie Coleman, Principal Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Erica Smith Unassigned Elementary Teacher BSE-Henderson State University, Arkadelphia, AR 5/06 Initial License Pending Smackover Elementary School, Smackover, AR 1/06 - 5/06 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Jessica Spaeth NLRHS West Campus, Spanish BA - University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR 5/05 Spanish P-8\nSpanish 7-12, English/Language Arts 7-12\nESL-P-8 Greenbrier Junior High, Greenbrier, AR 1/05 - 5/05 June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Gena M. Sparks Poplar Street Middle School, Special Education BSE - University of Houston, Houston, TX 6/02 License Pending Reciprocity Evans Middle School, McKinney, TX 8/04-6/06 Winship Elementary, Spring, TX 8/03 - 5/04 Lynn Lucas Middle School, Willis, TX 8/00- 5/03 Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel P-13 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: NAME: PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: EDUCATION: LICENSURE: EXPERIENCE: RECOMMENDATION: Gladys Swift Lakewood Middle School, Special Education BS - University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff, AR 8/76 MA- Webster University, Little Rock, AR 5/93 Health Education 7-12\nSecondary Physical Education 7-12  ALP for Special Education Dr. Ginger Wallace, Principal June Haynie, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Melinda Kaye Thompson Tri-District Early Childhood Program, Special Education BSE - University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 5/82 Elementary 1-6\nSpecial Education Early Childhood Specialist P-4\nSpecial Education Hearing Impaired P-4\nSpecial Education Hearing Impaired 4-12 Allied Therapy, Sherwood, AR 1997 - 2006 Access School, Little Rock, AR 1996 - 1997 Victory Baptist School, Sherwood, AR 1995 - 1996 Hurst, Euless, Bedford Schools, Hurst, TX 1987 - 1988 Williams Academy, Fort Worth, TX 1984 - 1987 A Arkansas School for the Deaf, Little Rock, AR 1982 - 1984  Thelma Jasper, Coordinator Tri-District Early Childhood Program Martha Kay Asti, Director of Special Services Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel Sophia Vega North Heights Elementary, Second Grade BA-Texas Lutheran University, Seguin, TX 12/99 MA- University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 12/04 License Pending Reciprocity John Glenn Elementary, San Antonio, TX 2004 - 2006 Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL TRANSFERS AND CHANGE~ Jeff Martello From Adm. Annex, Computer Technician To Administration, Software Support Specialist Effective 7 /21/06 P-14 NEW PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL PERSONNEL - Cedric Black Administration, Computer Operator Effective 7 /21/06 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS Sharon Conner Indian Hills Elementary, Special Education Aide Effective 6/30/06 Linda Evans NLRHS West Campus, Custodian Effective 6/29/06 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES Elden Baxter From Plant Services, Substitute Custodian To NLRHS West Campus, Custodian Stacy Reed From Amboy Elementary, Lead Custodian To Lakewood Middle School, SAC Aide - NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Rebecca Reeves Lakewood Middle School, Nurse-Bachelor's Effective 8-9-06, Category 403, Step 4, 193 days P-15 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY BIDS FOR APPROVAL BID NUMBER : 06-06-064 BID NAME : Copy Paper (3,000 cases) SOURCE OF FUNDING : District LOCATION: Warehouse Printing Paper Unisource Corporate Express * ** *** **** ***** Did Not Meet Specifications Part of all or No Bid Quality Not Recommended Limited Coverage Recommended $86,700.00 $80,115.00 $72,660.00 ***** S-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT A AES P - ARKANSAS ASSN. OF A AES P - ARKANSAS ASSN. OF A AES P - ARKANSAS ASSN. OF AP EXAMS A PLUS EDUCATION A T \u0026amp; T A T \u0026amp; T A TO Z INHOME TUTORING A TO Z INHOME TUTORING AW PELLER \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES INC AW PELLER \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES INC A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A-PLUS TEACHING SUPPLIES A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC MEA MEA MEA MEA MSBO MTFACS/FACS INSERVICE ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ABERNATHY COMPANY ACADEMIC COMMUNICATION ASSOC. ACADEMIC SUPERSTORE ACCESS SCHOOLS ACCESS SCHOOLS ACI PLASTICS ACT PUBLICATIONS ADEQ ADEQ ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS INC ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. AEA AEA AEA AEA AEA AEA AEA AEA AEA FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT UNION UNION UNION UNION UNION UNION T-- 1 AMOUNT .00 60.00 1,250.00 1,700.00 2,814.00 5,791.70 84.00 4 61. 72 5,910.30 2,700.00 222.85 58.22 1,285.11 503.02 158.12 590.58 34.00 510.00 318.80 75.84 850.00 20.00 200.00 374.81 127.63 353.87 316.80 37.50 276.30 3,900.00 3,600.00 368.67 500.00 150.00 150.00 11,303.45 11,822.90 9,318.02 88. 77 1,317.71 678. 96 189.60 189.60 50.00 2,477.00 2,414.50 2,414.50 1,839.50 1,839.50 CHK. NO. 0 57429 58056 58184 57245 57905 57488 57656 57833 58190 57120 57617 57379 57716 58007 58179 57701 57118 57405 57752 57829 57828 57506 57119 57430 57 616 57275 57257 57838 57145 57845 57434 57521 57148 57441 57773 57795 58039 57189 57878 57598 57747 57813 57081 57397 57609 57738 57782 57805 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. AFRICAN AMERICAN IMAGES 263.07 57224 AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED 36,575.29 57330 AHA PROCESS INCORPOARTED 5,894.44 57564 AIMEE WRIGHT 76.48 57556 ALAN CROWNOVER 167.88 57133 ALAN CROWNOVER 317.93 58193 ALARMCO INCORPORATED 1,569.50 57552 ALEXANDRA PRITCHETT 14.43 57153 ALIGN .00 57072 V ALIGN .00 57083 V ALIGN .00 57108 V ALIGN .00 57116 V ALIGN .00 57388 V ALIGN .00 57403 V ALIGN .00 57420 V ALIGN .00 57428 V ALIGN .00 57585 V ALIGN .00 57594 V ALIGN .00 57601 V ALIGN .00 57614 V ALIGN .00 57719 V ALIGN .00 57730 V ALIGN .00 57743 V ALIGN .00 57750 V ALIGN .00 57764 V ALIGN .00 57774 V ALIGN .00 57786 V ALIGN .00 57797 V ALIGN .00 57809 V ALIGN .00 57814 V ALIGN .00 57822 V ALIGN .00 57827 V ALIGN ~oo 58010 V ALIGN .00 58018 V ALIGN .00 58030 V ALIGN .00 58040 V ALIGN .00 58055 V ALIGN .00 58183 V ALIGN .00 58247 V ALIGN .00 58259 V ALISHA HERRING 110.29 57344 ALL AMERICAN INC. 2,840.00 57620 ALL AMERICAN INC. 2,221.05 57830 ALL AMERICAN INC. 242.92 58186 ALL AMERICAN SPORTSWEAR 1,619.73 57972 ALL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 112. 77 57384 ALL ELECTRIC SUPPLY, INC. 313.14 57717 ALLIED PRINTING AND SUPPLY CO. 2,430.70 57837 - ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTING 2,505.00 57289 T- 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTING ALLIED THERAPY \u0026amp; CONSULTING ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #858 ALLISON CALLAHAN ALLTEL ARENA ALLTEL ARENA ALLTEL MOBILE AMANDA STUCKEY AMANDA SYMANCYK AMBOY ELEM ACTIVITY FUND AMERICAN COMPOSTING INC. AMERICAN COMPOSTING INC. AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES AMSTERDAM PRINTING AMY VOLLMAN ANDRIA SMITH ANITA BELL ANN COWART ANNAN. VAMMEN ANNE PONDER APPLE COMPUTER APPLE COMPUTER INC AR BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE ARKANSAS ALTACARE ARKANSAS ART CENTER ARKANSAS AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS, ARKANSAS BAG \u0026amp; EQUIPMENT CO ARKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEALTH ARKANSAS DEPT. OF LABOR ARKANSAS FLAG \u0026amp; BANNER, INC. T-- 3 AMOUNT 462.00 2,580.00 4,315.78 4,287.44 4.37 147.84 10,925.00 99. 96 233.88 43.14 58.56 38.68 43.42 332.00 2,442.25 606.96 425.00 11,600.00 425.00 9,650.00 9,650.00 6,700.00 6,700.00 192.07 140.87 110 .10 7.80 538.00 40.45 236.70 650.00 1,990.34 1,440.00 267.42 1,918.52 1,972.50 45,045.00 362.50 407.22 689 .13 110. 00 110. 70 319.00 2,865.25 2,712.60 25.00 425.00 75.00 36.44 CHK. NO. 57538 57957 57248 58223 57359 57313 58148 57136 57327 57355 57692 57940 58126 57227 57490 57220 57080 57396 57593 57608 57737 57781 57804 57128 57260 57307 57308 57933 57698 57530 57950 57866 57296 57162 57636 57858 58128 57492 57545 58178 57523 57161 57635 57857 58073 57270 57524 57256 58058 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT ARKANSAS LYMPHEDEMA \u0026amp; THERAPY ARKANSAS PARENTING EDUCATION ARKANSAS SAFE SCHOOLS ASSN. ARKANSAS SPANISH INTERPRETER \u0026amp; ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT ARMATUR EXCHANGE ARROW PLUMBING INC ARTIS LOFTON ASCD ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASCO HARDWARE COMPANY, INC. ASHELY MALLETT ASHLEY HANAN ASHLEY-WOODSON \u0026amp; ASSOC. ASSOCIATION FOR SUPERVISION \u0026amp; BACKGROUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS BAM INSTITUTIONAL SALES BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-FEDERAL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BANK OF THE OZARKS-PAYROLL BARBARA KREMERS BARBARA LEE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARRY KINCL BASICS PLUS BASICS PLUS BECKY WITCHER BEDFORD CAMERA AND VIDEO T- 4 AMOUNT 360.00 30.00 150.00 333.25 744.35 647.00 1,308,019.12 60,002.87 7,024.22 135. 70 1,500.00 306.85 189.00 12,675.56 1,969.87 3,688.20 2.54 38.84 1,997.02 24.95 200.00 2,391.84 98,749.17 478,821.22 25,459.07 414,612.38 413,838.98 310,813.23 322,626.09 26,144.40 313,920.84 1,291,782.36 83,865.67 1,095,567.78 1,095,125.77 842,235.24 940,828.30 87,011.50 248.99 26. 42 503.78 4,594.52 205.47 63.94 70.78 926.05 126.90 147.19 422.54 CHK. NO. 57235 58174 57233 57569 57600 57749 58260 58261 58262 57460 58165 57959 57682 57123 57618 58057 58252 57347 57226 57436 57433 57986 57074 57390 57587 57603 57732 57776 57799 57824 57073 57389 57586 57602 57731 57775 57798 57823 57186 57109 57140 57624 57841 58063 58060 57840 58062 57252 57435 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT BEDFORD CAMERA AND VIDEO BENCHMARK EDUCATION COMPANY BENCHMARK EDUCATION COMPANY BILL DUVALL BILL DUVALL BILL DUVALL BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BILL'S OFFICE FURNITURE BLICK ART MATERIALS BLUE HILL WRECKER SERVICE BMI EDUCATIONAL SERVICES BMI EDUCATIONAL SERVICES BOBBY D PERRY MD BOONE PARK ELEM ACTIVITY FUND BOONE PARK ELEM ACTIVITY FUND BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS BRANDY NESSELRODT BRAYE VALENTINE BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA BUTLER BRENDA PARKER BRIAN HARVEY BRIGHT APPLE BROAD REACH BSW ADVERTISING BUDGET OFFICE FURNITURE BURGE PHOTOGRAPHY INC BUSINESS MACHINES SYSTEMS, INC BYE WAY BOOKS INC CA VINES ARKANSAS 4-H CENTER C.T.A. C.T.A. C.T.A. CABOT FLORISTS CABOT FLORISTS CAMBIUM LEARNING INC CAPITAL ONE BANK SIGNET BANK CARLTON-BATES CO. CARSON DELLOSA PUBLISHING CO CATFISH CITY CATHERINE ALEXANDER CATRICIA HICKMAN CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CCI OF ARKANSAS, INC. CEI T- 5 AMOUNT 153.48 8,337.10 3,032.64 71.12 91. 30 29.91 19. 62 356.33 87.20 2,172.76 253.24 228.90 156.83 4,987.91 168.81 110.01 12.15 1,088.10 3,724.75 99.61 140.00 76.93 30.42 106.24 182.61 968. 75 133. 52 473.96 4,959.37 244.68 103.55 151.31 13,404.25 9,073.35 9,073.35 7,850.70 150.27 39.19 35.37 10.00 551.88 18.07 619.44 236.70 236.70 5,230.75 9,137.08 147.00 207.87 CHK. NO. 57623 57303 57548 57141 57842 58196 57647 57869 57126 57831 57378 57437 57142 57626 57094 57106 57107 57843 58064 57360 57917 57320 57557 57366 57887 57977 58201 57892 57253 57385 58189 58176 58187 57595 57744 57810 57440 5784 6 58076 57101 57147 57277 57498 57535 57529 57570 57982 58156 57216 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND 432.00 57923 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 26.08 57132 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 8,733.27 57836 CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES 21,802.50 57860 CENTRAL ALARM SYSTEMS INC 158.95 57903 CENTRAL ARKANSAS SPORTS 220.53 57102 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. 1,654.16 57532 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. 1,188.10 57953 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES, INC. 287.62 58136 CEZIRAE THOMAS 100.00 57669 CHANNING BETE COMPANY INC 2,608.15 57631 CHANNING BETE COMPANY INC 1,128.78 58067 CHERYL HALL 16.62 57266 CHEYENNE INDUSTRIES 1,086.77 57229 CHILD CARE PROVIDERS FUND 50.00 57941 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 195.87 57150 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 367.98 57442 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 592.52 57630 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 3,350.95 57849 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 943.75 58066 CHILDCRAFT EDUCATION CORP 183.97 58198 CHILDRENS LIBRARY RESOURCES 109.05 57709 CHILDRENS LIBRARY RESOURCES 13.98 57996 CHRISTEN BURKE PITTS 85.56 57788 CHRISTOPHER-GORDON PUBLISHERS 34.95 57487 CINTAS 128.18 57088 CINTAS 38.26 57407 CINTAS 128.18 57423 CINTAS 128.18 57816 CITY CREEK PRESS INC 64.18 57238 CLARION RESORT HOTEL 306.30 57279 CLARION RESORT HOTEL 238.20 57387 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO, INC. 1,002.80 57207 CLARK EXTERMINATING CO, INC. 1,526.00 57654 CLASSROOM DIRECT 376.66 57309 CLASSROOM DIRECT 471.50 57697 CLASSROOM DIRECT 2,296.00 57971 CLAUDIA MORAN 87.91 57350 CLEAN SOLUTIONS 347.00 57994 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 93.20 57290 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 73.55 57541 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 'i4. 80 57689 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 89.59 57962 CLEAR MOUNTAIN 58.15 58143 CLEMENTS \u0026amp; ASSOCIATES/ 16,267.00 57922 COMC ABLES 4,596.21 57861 COMCAST CABLEVISION 100.00 57622 COMCAST CABLEVISION 100.00 58194 - COMMUNICATION PLUS+ 356.50 57517 T- 6 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT COMMUNITY PRODUCTS LLC COMMUNITY PRODUCTS LLC COMPASS LEARNING COMPASS POINT BOOKS COMPUTER PREP CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS COSTUME CORNER COUNCIL FOR PROFESSIONAL CREATIVE DIVERSITY CRESTWOOD ELEM ACTIVITY FUND CROCKETT BUSINESS MACHINES CROCKETT BUSINESS MACHINES CROW BURLINGAME CO CROWN TROPHY CRYSTAL EVANS CRYSTAL WOOD CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC CULLEN \u0026amp; CO PLLC CUMMINS MID SOUTH LLC CWI, PLC D \u0026amp; H DISTRIBUTING D \u0026amp; H DISTRIBUTING DAN RUSSELL DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA CHADWICK DANA MCCOY DANIEL K MACGLOTHIN DANNY REED DANYIAL WILLIAMSON DAPHNE KNIGHTEN DAPHNE KNIGHTEN DARLA EARLES DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS DATEK, INC. DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP DAVID D. COOP T- 7 AMOUNT 937.00 880.00 129,179.95 578.30 2,078.33 152.23 191.25 117. 69 21,986.30 876.06 895.47 3,470.50 867.17 48.58 76. 00 5.99 47.38 305.89 1,464.60 208.36 160.44 32.37 13 .08 125.97 125.97 81. 30 42.86 2,235.00. 17,352.70 2,345.00 140.01 90. 45 91.10 1.15 4.69 160.33 20.00 121.87 594.00 29.14 96. 64 22.62 26,108.68 28.80 157.79 494.32 2,963.00 71. 08 2,963.00 CHK. NO. 5734 6 57991 57974 57504 58112 57768 57791 58034 57272 57525 57945 58130 58230 57885 58108 58069 57295 57677 58124 57526 57646 57531 57181 57408 57721 57754 57539 57463 57124 57619 57968 57155 57447 57787 58248 57361 57086 57687 57483 57286 58233 57182 57615 58185 58006 57084 57404 57421 57751 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT DAVID D. COOP DAWNE CARROLL DEALERS TRUCK EQUIPMENT DEANN ROACH DEBBIE DAVENPORT DEBORAH ANDERSON DEBORAH COKER DEBORAH G DUNSTON DEBRA BUTLER DELI PARTNER'S DELI PARTNER'S DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA EDUCATION DEMCO DEMCO DEMCO DENISE HOUGHTON DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINISTRAT DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX DINAH ALLEN DISCOUNT DICTIONARIES DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DISCOUNT TROPHIES, INC. DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DISCOVER BANK DON ADAMS DONNA STEWART DORCUS HOUSE DOROTHY FARRIS DOYALENE WASSON DREW CAMP EAST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND EAST COAST WHOLESALE INC EAST SIDE ENTREES INC EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS ECOLAB, INC. EDS SUPPLY CO. EDS SUPPLY CO. T- 8 AMOUNT 2,963.00 61. 35 34.40 32.10 14.59 278.99 31.20 1,600.00 2.73 264.30 258.14 54,838.54 43,167.71 33,731.45 55,190.24 661.10 312.00 102.17 429.93 809.36 372,069.31 9.38 11,499.00 31. 01 6,562.16 672. 95 201.81 2,811.11 349.38 229.22 98.00 136.85 98.00 98.00 131.85 120.00 79. 56 62. 40 138.72 361.44 126.05 1,131.0C 131.94 17,232.00 450.00 300.00 891.62 443.33 54.15 CHK. NO. 58019 57300 57881 57351 57581 57219 58154 57577 57269 57249 57927 57112 57767 58033 58255 57920 57446 V 57632 58068 58224 58041 57852 58264 57154 57336 57276 57528 58134 57157 57093 57409 57425 57722 57755 57818 57284 57149 57930 57318 57832 57376 57690 58144 57657 57299 57694 57854 57158 57855 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT EDS SUPPLY CO. EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY OF EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY OF EDUCATORS BOOK DEPOSITORY OF ELAINE OTTO ELAINE WOMACK ELECTRONIC VIDEO SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC VIDEO SYSTEMS ELENA REYES-LOVINS ELIZABETH BROOKS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISION ENTERGY SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTS INC ERIC ARMIN INC. ETA/CUISENAIRE ETA/CUISENAIRE ETA/CUISENAIRE EYE ON EDUCATION EYE ON EDUCATION FAIRY TALE FLORALS FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTER FARRELL-CALHOUN PAINT CO FARRELL-CALHOUN PAINT CO FARRELL-CALHOUN PAINT CO FERRELLGAS FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR, INC FLISS FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES FRAN HARRIS FRAN JACKSON FREY SCIENTIFIC CO. FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY CARE INC FULL COUNSEL PREPARATORY ACAD GALVIN WAITS GARRETT BOOK COMPANY GARY BUNN GEORGE TAYLOR GESCO COMPANYIN C GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHJX GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX T- 9 AMOUNT 191. 61 638.54 107.15 7,235.61 50.00 400.00 701.96 5,504.68 236.70 236.70 389,686.62 292,545.02 228,463.28 377,802.86 25.00 2,014.05 717.81 394.24 5,637.22 352.32 69.90 126.80 353.16 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00 115. 52 241.54 667.47 47.00 616.29 625.00 603 .11 1,013.88 295.64 1,339.94 618.56 52 6. 92 2,015.00 '.:,,456.00 103.96 751.60 79.91 16.38 51.06 552.46 952.99 CHK. NO. 58070 57159 57634 58071 57240 57931 57144 57844 57580 57467 57114 57772 58038 58257 57099 57280 57129 57163 57637 58074 57134 57839 58170 57413 57726 57759 58015 58024 57168 57639 58078 57494 57451 57979 57166 57450 58077 58225 57367 57167 57223 57668 57104 57565 57948 58205 57904 57328 57975 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. GLOBAL DOCUGRAPHIX 842.92 58152 GLORIA SMITH 90.17 58005 GLOVERS TRUCK PARTS \u0026amp; 268.69 57453 GRAINGER 1,162.94 57241 GRAINGER 88.58 57500 GREAT AMERCIAN OPPORTUNITIES 1,688.19 57455 GRETCHEN LAUIPPA 360.00 57341 GWEN FITZPATRICK 11. 44 57862 HAND IN HAND DAY CARE 1,500.00 57613 HANDWRITING WITHOUT TEARS 520.00 57319 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 1,680.77 57357 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 3,928.36 57710 HARCOURT ACHIEVE 2,420.89 58241 HAROLD D STARK 94.38 57373 HAROLD D STARK 40.56 57715 HAROLD NASH 300.00 57050 V HAROLD NASH 100.00 58164 HELPING HAND CHILDRENS 1,711.25 57554 HIGHSMITH INC 2,100.20 57174 HIGHSMITH INC 2,701.84 57458 HIGHSMITH INC 1,173.07 58208 HOBBY LOBBY 684.75 57642 HOBBY LOBBY 187.52 57864 - HOME DEPOT/GECF 431.12 57509 HOME DEPOT/GECF 229.21 57674 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 476.58 57417 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 278. 23 57727 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 278.23 57761 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 278. 23 58016 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 278.23 58026 HOT SPRINGS TECHNOLOGY 440.00 57555 HOT SPRINGS TECHNOLOGY 2,970.00 58149 HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY 561.42 57643 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NLR 2,000.00 57625 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 2,887.21 57335 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 367.41 57702 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 4,097.99 57985 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 421.08 58238 HUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 31. 23 57175 HUM'S HARDWARE \u0026amp; RENTAL 4.59 58081 I TECH AUDIO 907.30 57187 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT 425.00 57414 IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL 2,880.00 57645 IMPACT EDUCATION 10,250.00 58215 IN DYER NEED ENTERPRISES 192.83 57131 INDEPENDENT MUSIC SERVICE, INC 435.00 57 680 INDEPENDENT MUSIC SERVICE, INC 70.00 58227 INFORMATION VAULTING SERVICES 153.40 57454 - INFORMATION VAULTING SERVICES 153.40 58204 T-10 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS ING RETIREMENT PLANS INN OF THE OZARKS INSIGHT MEDIA INSTRUCTIVISION INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL READING ASSN J \u0026amp; B MUSIC SALES, INC. J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY J L HEIN SERVICE INC JS PRINTING J. L. HEIN SERVICE, INC. JACK,LYON,\u0026amp; JONES, P.A. JACK,LYON,\u0026amp; JONES, P.A. JACQUELINE SUMLER JAMES R WILLIAMS JAMES W. WOODARD, JR JAMIE EUBANKS JANET E. THOMAS P.T. JANET FOSTER JANIS MASTERS JANN PHARO JEANNE P WILLIAMS JEFFREY MARTELLO JEFFREY MARTELLO JEFFREY MARTELLO JENNIFER CONNER JENNY OBANNON JERRY DOWDY JERRY DOWDY JERRY DOWDY JERRY DOWDY JERRY MASSEY JERRY MASSEY . T-11 AMOUNT 4 62. 50 3,465.00 300.00 2,950.00 2,950.00 2,502.50 2,502.50 333.76 229.95 496.73 130,704.36 2,496.69 1,387.33 71,954.91 55,151.65 446.16 136.00 136.00 136.00 136. 00 136. 00 61. 00 27.52 2,453.76 49,574.00 240.00 26,583.00 5,943.75 983.50 63.02 538.00 83.62 1,680.00 980.00 273.24 3,330.00 48 .13 67.92 257.58 52.81 173.23 236.70 237.87 36. 00 25.85 52.81 111.89 174.05 152.45 CHK. NO. 57079 57395 57592 57607 57736 57780 57803 57919 57273 58059 57302 57546 57696 57966 58146 58234 57412 57725 57758 58014 58023 57156 58117 57942 58168 57246 57993 57644 58082 57368 57921 57370 57571 57247 57264 57520 57254 58061 57209 57889 58216 57472 57326 57363 57583 57999 58244 57265 58228 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT JIMMIE DOTSON JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE JO-ANN GOLDMAN, TRUSTEE JODY EDRINGTON JODY EDRINGTON JODY EDRINGTON JOE COVEY JOHNS BURGIN JOHN TURNER SCHOOL SUPPLIES JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY JOSH SPILLYARDS JOSTENS JOSTENS-THE GRAD SHOP JOURNEYWORKS PUBLISHING JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN JOYCE CLEVELAND JUDY BROUGHTON JUDY BROUGHTON JUNE HAYNIE JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD JUST FOR KIDS THERAPY SERVICES JUST US KANSAS PAYMENT CENTER KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING CO KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING CO KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING CO KAREN BREWER KAREN COLEMAN KAREN POWELL KARLA WHISNANT KASSANDRA WELLS KATHRYN HALE KATHY VANCE CHAMBERS KATIE VANDIVER KATIE VANDIVER KATIE VANDIVER KATY GEARHART HUNT KAYE LOWE KAYE LOWE T-12 AMOUNT 64.07 281. 37 281.37 281. 37 113. 94 149.04 3,374.51 50.00 2,000.00 134.78 50.35 50.35 50.35 50.35 50.35 128.00 69.04 52.32 1,414.80 592.44 5,781.54 327.23 5,781.54 297.23 5,781.54 1,216.88 236.70 241.80 252.38 280.80 1,770.00 372. 35 46.15 1,124.19 765.54 1,217.19 770.00 236.70 70.04 236.70 20. ~o 7 4. tj2 135. 25 378.70 236.70 538.00 111.07 201.14 50.26 CHK. NO. 57343 57090 57424 57817 57261 57518 57679 57926 57912 57358 57418 57728 57762 58017 58027 57978 57969 57924 58114 57100 57416 57427 57760 57821 58025 58222 57540 57958 58084 57898 57578 57851 57089 57178 57461 57870 57567 57576 57278 57491 58251 577C':_ 57274 57465 57466 57872 57135 57629 57848 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT KAYE LOWE KAYE LOWE KEATHLEY PATTERSON ELECTRIC KEITH FAULKNER KENNETH A. KIRSPEL KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. KERR PAPER \u0026amp; SUPPLY CO. KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS KEVA RODGERS KEVIN MARTIN KEVIN MARTIN KEVIN MARTIN KIM PEARSON KIM PEARSON KIM REYNOLDS KIMBERLY JOHNSTON KIMBERLY STAFFORD KNOWBUDDYR ESOURCES KNOWLEDGE TREE KNOWLEDGE TREE KONE INC KRISTEN MADDOX KRISTIE RATLIFF KRISTIE RATLIFF KRISTIE RATLIFF KROGER #639 KROGER COMPANY/INDIAN HILLS KRONOS KRONOS LAHARPES OFFICE FURNITURE LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS LAKEWOOD ELEM ACTIVITY FUND LAKEWOOD MIDDLE ACTIVITY FUND LAKEWOOD MIDDLE ACTIVITY FUND LANCE BALLARD LARA HUMPHRIES LAURA JENNINGS LAURA WINTERS LEARNING RESOURCES T-13 AMOUNT 24.00 11. 23 500.21 178.75 500.00 443.76 10,919.86 2,816.50 593.17 4,027.36 2,951.39 29,665.37 4,405.13 31.98 36.00 52.81 64.82 145.08 130. 38 33.97 25.00 266.52 1,144.70 188.13 94.36 1,090.00 26.52 49.76 20.70 4.50 167.69 51.08 862.50 262.50 9,047.50 3,173.20 3,528.89 4,826.15 2,516.00 300.74 732.20 137.74- 526. 72 608.45 125.00 77.96 87.13 56.24 182.72 CHK. NO. 58065 58197 57117 57103 57386 57380 58008 58180 57711 57998 58123 58173 58243 57321 57364 58001 58246 57306 57970 57152 57110 58249 58151 57512 57935 57510 57305 57322 57558 58236 57251 57179 57638 58202 58085 57213 57484 57658 57891 58100 58217 57542 57691 57963 57673 57348 57125 57204 57317 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT LEARNING RESOURCES LEE TACKETT LESLIE HUFFMAN LETITIA MARTIN LETITIA MARTIN LETITIA MARTIN LIBRARIANS' BOOK EXPRESS LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LIFE INS OF SOUTHWEST LINDSEY'S BARBECUE LINDSEY'S BARBECUE LISA DOSS LISA DOSS LISA DOSS LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. LONGS ELECTRONICS LONNELL D TIMS LORI PORTER LOWE'S LOWE'S LUNCHBYTE SYSTEM INC LYNCH DRIVE ELEM ACTIVITY LYNDA SISCO LYNN CHADWICK LYNN CHADWICK LYNN CHADWICK LYNN CHADWICK LYNN CHADWICK M J COMMUNICATIONS MACHINE ADVANTAGE MAD SCIENCE OF CENTRAL MAGIC SPRINGS \u0026amp; CRYSTAL FALLS MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE MARCIA CHAPPLE-DEAN MARCIVE, INC . MARCIVE, INC MARDEL #8 MARDEL #8 MARGARET VICKERS MARI INC. T-14 AMOUNT 18.43 462.00 87.67 18.34 234.00 8.98 800.83 316.93 832.83 5,118.34 7,260.52 143.18 581.30 834.06 544.03 11,297.50 607.31 571.84 194.25 236.70 524.20 538.00 134. 41 778.94 749.00 300.00 300.00 287.81 711. 64 310.00 395.91 100.00 145.47 15.99 96.20 408.64 9.38 43.60 1,674.00 616.00 532.00 30,833.33 77.03 54.45 34.68 52. 89 29.10 236.70 158.68 CHK. NO. 58235 57345 57184 57369 57714 58004 57876 57464 58087 57075 57391 57588 57604 57733 57777 57800 57825 57180 58086 57511 57675 57934 57191 58210 57648 57671 57237 57718 58181 57550 57294 57847 57513 57676 57789 57937 58253 57381 58095 58106 57331 57621 57288 57185 57650 57271 57684 57572 57944 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. MARIA TOUCHSTONE 83.23 57314 MARIA TOUCHSTONE 19.89 57553 MARIBEL SIEMS 770.00 57708 MARILYN BURNS EDUCATION ASSOC 790.00 57742 MARJEAN ROWE 146.68 57138 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 162.47 57268 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 94.87 57522 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 111. 03 58229 MARTHA NORTON 1,645.00 57354 MARY A. WILES 164.74 57205 MARY BETH COX 67.39 57310 MARY CAROLYN EAST 61. 55 57374 MARY KATHERINE BENTLEY 128.00 57867 MARY TAYLOR 25.00 58169 MATH SOLUTIONS PUBLICATIONS 1,813.54 58155 MATTHEW SEGO INC 2,888.95 57907 MBEA 1,185.00 57239 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 5,325.00 57340 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 6,255.00 57703 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 4,700.00 57988 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 4,600.00 58161 - MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 1,325.00 58162 MCCLURE LANDSCAPING 1,945.00 58163 MCM 69.88 57267 MELISSA CANNON 300.62 58127 MELISSA DOUGLAS 93.36 57202 MELISSA DOUGLAS 811.17 57479 MELISSA HANCOCK 75.66 57337 METHODIST DAY TREATMENT SCHOOL 33,770.00 58158 METHODIST DAY TREATMENT SCHOOL 2,850.00' 58159 METRO BUILDERS \u0026amp; RESTORATION 519.13 57127 METRO FOODS 13,220.50 57263 MICHAEL BLYTHE 45.65 57850 MICHAEL BLYTHE 134. 86 58199 MICHAEL HEAVNER 5,715.00 57925 MICHAEL MARSH 236.70 57471 MICHELLE BONES 172.49 57172 MICHELLE BONES 445.70 57456 MICHELLE BONES 125.99 58206 MICHELLE KEATON 56.00 57349 MIDAMERICA BOOKS 118. 77 57574 MIKKI EUBANK 1,077.79 57082 MILLENNIUM EDUCATION MUSIC 3,467.00 57633 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY INC 3,060.33 57686 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY INC 6,899.82 58232 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 60.00 57562 - MOUNT ST MARY ACADEMY 200.00 57667 MR. WIZARD STUDIOS 60.90 58120 MRS CLARKS FOOD 1,439.00 57481 T-15 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT MU ALPHA THtTA MU ALPHA THETA MUSIC IN MOTION MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY N.L.R. WINTEMP SUPPLY NAEIR NAEIR NAEIR NANCY C. GREEN NANCY SETZLER NANCY SHEEHAN NANCY STEWART NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS NASC/NASSP NASCO NASCO NASCO NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY NATIONAL HOME CENTER NATIONAL HOME CENTER NATIONAL SCHOOL PRODUCTS NATIONAL SCHOOL PRODUCTS NATIONAL SCHOOL PUBLIC NBI INC NC CHILD SUPPORT CENTRALIZED NFHS NLR WELDING SUPPLY NLRHS WEST CAMPUS NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD TRANSPORTATION DEPT. NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD WAREHOUSE NLRSD WJ.\n:-'EHOUSE NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK NLRSD-BACKGROUND GHECK NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE NLRSD-SELF INSURANCE NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED T-16 AMOUNT 529.60 7.00 80.80 40.00 244.85 34.99 1,118.63 127.60 40.00 432.00 41. 00 75.04 13.63 70.98 339.03 630.47 391.16 12.79 66.00 282.10 282.88 631.20 9,819.39 581. 93 36.28 357.96 133.20 5.95 325.00 1,495.00 137. 00 120.00 10.31 120.00 4,296.18 8,786.82 420.00 703.50 283.50 725.00 2,750.00 2,225.00 257.64 53.80 11,216.79 14,651.43 8,805.34 78,506.13 56,674.16 CHK. NO. 57164 57449 57259 57877 57190 57469 57651 58088 57505 57913 58119 58135 58263 57193 57282 57169 57452 57863 58091 57192 57652 57879 57194 58211 57470 57880 57195 58090 57203 57171 57415 58089 57196 57478 57236 57493 57664 57910 58113 57584 57713 58003 57599 57748 57771 57794 58037 57596 57745 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT NO. LITTLE ROCK EDUCATORS CRED NO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. NO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. NO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. NO. LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. NORTH AMERICAN BOOK NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMASTER NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY COMPA NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH LITTLE ROCK UTILITIES NORTH POINT FORD NORTHSIDE SALES COMPANY NORTHSIDE SALES COMPANY NOVA STAGGS O'REILLY AUTO PARTS OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OCSE OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OLIVIA MARTINEZ G:-1AR BROWN OMAR BROWN OMNI NEW HAVEN HOTEL AT YALE OTTER CREEK INSTITUTE OTTER CREEK INSTITUTE OUR HOUSE OXFORD GRAPHICS PACHECO OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT T-17 AMOUNT 35,040.08 151. 59 394.96 38.56 8,905.25 105.00 273.00 316.25 3,040.20 128.44 .56 316.44 277. 62 10.65 127.90 1,232.52 876.09 733.43 79,585.59 566.91 894.40 376.98 146.46 4.35 2,221.40 2,453.46 1,586.09 1,821.71 1,821.71 1,599.38 991.04 991.04 8,928.41 1,202.29 2,177.01 2,356.68 6,903.98 64. 62 64.62 64. 62 30.00 104.00 132. 00 1,696.80 537.00 179.00 93.60 136.93 16,384.86 CHK. NO. 57811 57197 57473 58092 58212 57551 57198 57199 57474 57105 57115 57419 57763 57796 58028 58258 57200 57448 57859 57468 57477 57653 57377 57568 57085 57406 57422 57720 57753 57815 58011 58020 57258 57515 57678 57938 58125 57095 57426 57819 57503 57183 57871 57243 57362 58175 57929 57188 57706 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 - ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. PACIFIC LEARNING 125.00 58195 PAM HANDLOSER 939.00 57332 PARK HILL FLORIST 51.78 57480 PARK HILL FLORIST 54.50 58214 PAT WONN 122.06 57932 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 77.22 57334 PAULA BRADLEY 236.70 57559 PAULA MCCARTHER 1,620.00 58226 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING 54. 95  57649 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING 69.19 57873 PEARSON EDUCATION 1,576.07 57575 PEARSON EDUCATION 3,891.02 57704 PEARSON EDUCATION 10,507.71 57990 PEARSON EDUCATION 1,122.04 58166 PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICES 2,801.25 57995 PENWORTHY COMPANY 382 .11 58002 PERFECTION LEARNING CORP. 714.08 58110 PERFORMANCE LEARNING INC. 743.35 57915 PERMA-BOUND 614.28 57173 PERMA-BOUND 1,324.21 57457 PERMA-BOUND 4,795.98 57641 PERMA-BOUND 70.74 58080 PERMA-BOUND 2,367.82 58207 PERSONNEL CONCEPTS 117. 85 58239 PETERSON CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK 333.84 57536 PETREVIA BOARDMAN 48.04 57960 PHOENIX LEARNING GROUP 104.45 57954 PILAR MURPHY 28.08 57339 PINNACLE POINTE HOSPITAL 41,120.00 58129 PIONEER DISTRIBUTING CO. 28,820.08 58094 PIONEER VALLEY EDUCATIONAL 566.50 57353 PIONEER VALLEY EDUCATIONAL 946.00 58171 PITTSBURGH PAINTS 433.15 57225 PITTSBURGH PAINTS 4,334.35 58107 PLATO INC 1,500.00 58157 PLAY WITH A PURPOSE 4 01. 35 57244 PLAY WITH A PURPOSE 273.70 58118 PLUMBING WAREHOUSE 2,587.29 57875 POE TRAVEL 614.70 57874 POPEYES CHICKEN 389.93 57234 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 153.70 57533 POSITIVE PRO!:\u0026lt;CrIONS 165.45 58137 PRESTWICK HOUSE INC 154.48 57980 PRIMARY CONCEPTS 3,854.55 57325 PRINT CONNECTIONS PROMOTIONAL 505.76 57573 PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA 2,455.48 57400 PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA 2,192.74 57612 PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA 2,192.74 57741 - PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA 1,352.65 57785 T-18 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT AMOUNT CHK. NO. PRO BENEFITS GROUP/TPA 1,352.65 57808 PRO-ACT INC OBA 307.38 58138 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS 253.00 57365 PROMOTIONS PLUS 1,157.53 57952 PROQUEST INFORMATION AND 79.95 57886 PROVIDIAN NATIONAL BANK 133. 06 57087 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES-RETIREMENT SY 3,725.00 57077 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SY 1,385.28 57590 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SY 936.48 57826 PUBLIC SCHOOL VEHICLE PROGRAM 120.00 57628 PURVIS BEARING SERVICE 27.01 57338 QUALITY PETROLEUM INC 4 04. 64 57459 RADIO SHACK 1,508.39 57210 RADIO SHACK 1,078.24 57655 RADIO SHACK 16.34 58097 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A. 180. 96 57091 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A. 20.00 57092 RAINEY ELECTRONICS 164.20 58098 RAMSEY CHEMICAL \u0026amp; EQUIPMENT 119.88 57301 RAQUELL BARTON 19 .11 57792 REALLY GOOD STUFF INC 143.17 57324 REALLY GOOD STUFF INC 1,124.55 58150 REBECCA GARDNER 236.70 57514 REBECCA R CARR 3,951.29 57304 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 6,032.06 57947 RED DOOR GALLERY 98.10 57890 RED ZONE ATHLETICS 12,542.11 57883 REDWOOD ELEM ACTIVITY FUND 123.57 57964 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 309.05. 57212 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 349.39 57482 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 227.80 58099 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62. 61 57411 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62.61 57724 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62. 61 57757 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62.61 58013 REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU INC 62. 61 58022 RELLIA DILLINGER 76.79 57375 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 645.00 57228 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 587.23 57908 RENAISSANCE LEARNING INC 398.50 58109 RENEE' BONA 12.00 57372 REXEL DAVIES 133 .16 57160 REXEL DAVIES 170.77 58072 RHONDA BANKS 26. 52 57298 RHONDA BROWN 180. 96 57432 RHONDA BROWN 15.60 58188 RICHARD ALEXANDER 620.00 57401 - RICHARD ALEXANDER 490.00 57402 RITA LOVENSTEIN 42.31 57122 T-19 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT RIVENDELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH RIVER CITY JANITORIAL SUPPLY RIVER CITY JANITORIAL SUPPLY RIVER VALLEY HORTICULTURAL RIVERSIDE BOX SUPPLY CO. RIVERSIDE BOX SUPPLY CO. ROBERT COX ROBERT GLOVER ROSE CITY MIDDLE ACTIVITY FUND ROSEMARIE DRAKE SAGEBRUSH CORPORATION SAIED MUSIC CO SAIED MUSIC CO SALLY MARTIN SAMANTHA CURRAN SAMS CLUB DIRECT SAMS CLUB DIRECT SAMS CLUB DIRECT SANDERS SUPPLY SANDERS SUPPLY SARA LOGAN SARA MCALISTER SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO SARGENT-WELCH SCIENTIFIC CO SAX ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SBG-VAA SCANTRON CORPORATION SCHOLARS LEARNING CENTER SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC INC SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING SCHOOL AIDS SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOL SPECIALITY SCHOOLWI DE INC  SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP T-20 AMOUNT 550.00 76.20 145.13 198.97 43.00 958.90 104.00 138. 79 117. 53 1,540.00 9,124.67 77 .17 70.59 98.01 37.17 380.18 120.00 7,700.90 160.18 511. 54 126.36 200.00 20.38 3,239.87 78.80 1,031.00 1,031.00 1,031.00 1,031.00 1,031.00 2,941.66 30,870.00 397.10 3,411.89 340.89 5,006.07 606.08 12,047.35 3,910.90 271.30 1,254.34 559.48 26,406.27 4,103.03 6.98 675.00 675.00 675.00 575.00 CHK. NO. 58102 57549 58147 57206 57485 58101 57232 57902 57292 57462 57311 57695 57965 57137 57139 57208 57888 58096 57356 57579 57534 57218 57946 58131 57659 57398 57610 57739 57783 57806 57211 58122 57352 57992 58240 57214 58103 58218 57342 57896 57215 57660 57895 58219 57627 57399 57611 57740 57784 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP SETH SPEER SEVENTH STREET ELEM ACTIVITY SHANDRIA GORDON SHARA BRAZEAR SHARA BRAZEAR SHARON ELDRED SHARON HAVER SHARON HAVER SHEILA BAKER SHELLY JONES SHERMAN ACQUISITION LIMITED SHERMAN ACQUISITION LIMITED SHERRY RATLIFF SHRED-IT SHRED-IT SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP SKILLS USA/VICA SOCCER PLUS SOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL SERVICE SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT SOUTHERN ICE EQUIPMENT SOUTHWEST SPORTING GOODS CO SPECIAL SHOW 2006 SPLASH FULL SERVICE CARWASH \u0026amp; SPORTSCENE OF ARKANSAS ST. MARY'S SCHOOL ST. PATRICK'S SCHOOL STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STANLEY HARDWARE CO. STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO., INC. STATE BUSINESS SUPPLY STATE BUSINESS SUPPLY STEPHEN WARD STEVE CANADY SUMMIT LEARNING SUNBURST VISUAL MEDIA SUNBURST VISUAL MEDIA SUNBURST VISUAL MEDIA SUPER DUPER INC SUPERIOR SPRING CLUTCH \u0026amp; GEAR SUPREME FIXTURE CO. SUSAN HYDEN SUSAN MAY SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER T-21 AMOUNT 575.00 252.00 60.18 1,180.00 702.09 401.18 202.21 180.68 26.02 25.90 106.37 464.38 113. 60 159.89 146.25 357.50 1,364.90 431.64 12.50 325.08 47.73 274. 94 4,897.78 32.25 739.76 300.00 35. 94 270.59 1,152.00 8,064.00 2 61. 70 122.41 42.87 590.50 95.89 711. 65 800.00 59.52 62.55 5,151.72 383.20 334.88 340.48 629.71 115,142.90 231.50 236.70 11,699.96 22,136.03 CHK. NO. 57807 57853 57293 58167 57537 58139 57371 57497 58115 58177 58200 57096 57820 57250 57315 57973 57170 58079 57046 V 57961 57897 57997 58172 58242 57899 57316 57672 58209 57661 57662 57221 58104 57222 58105 57297 58145 57707 57894 57936 57663 57906 58220 57439 57486 57489 57177 57496 57165 58075 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT SYMTRAX CORPORATION T-SHIRT SHOP TARGET BUSINESS CARD SERVICES TASC TASC TASC TASC TASC TASC TASC TAYLOR M COLUMBUS TEACHER EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION TEACHER'S MEDIA COMPANY TEACHERS DISCOVERY TEACHERS MEDIA COMPANY TEACHERS MEDIA COMPANY TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER TECH-KNOW INDUSTRIES TECH-KNOW INDUSTRIES TECH-KNOW INDUSTRIES TELE TOUCH TEXAS INSTRUMENTS THE BRIDGEWAY THE COLLEGE BOARD THE EDUCATION PEOPLE INC THE FIELD SHOP THE GRAD SHOP THE LIBRARY STORE THE LIBRARY STORE THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE MCGRAW HILL COMPANIES THE NATIONAL BETA CLUB THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY THE PRINTING DEPARTMENT INC THE SPORTSTOP INC. THE TIMES THELMA JASPER THERAPY PROVIDERS, P.A. THOMSON GALE TNT SCHOOL SUPPLIES INC. TODD HUFF TOM SNYDER PRODUCTIONS TOWNSEND PRESS BOOK CENTER TRACEE RAINEY TRANS AMERICAN TIRE COMPANY T-22 AMOUNT 450.00 13.35 361.34 116. 66 11,700.50 116. 66 10,964.61 10,964.61 8,626.75 8,626.75 132.00 300.00 2,100.00 515.68 33.90 682.70 26.93 113 .11 132. 80 7,324.43 1,156.98 1,176.00 105.37 1,300.00 1,350.00 690.00 999.88 84.93 731. 39 144.74 326.02 1,128.82 1,260.21 2,642.68 930.56 1,261.00 2,739.00 901.98 582.74 300.00 9.15 9,866.25 40.90 79.93 236.70 2,120.00 181.22 108.97 4,495.52 CHK. NO. 57981 57955 57230 57076 57392 57589 57605 57734 57778 57801 57865 57323 57560 57856 58160 57130 57834 57683 57943 57712 58000 58245 57431 57884 58133 57989 57566 57685 57987 57383 58009 57287 57688 57956 58141 57516 58203 57984 57901 57909 57939 57681 57121 57146 57443 58083 57151 57176 57143 . ' .... NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT TRANS AMERICAN TIRE COMPANY TRI-STATES VIDEO AND TRI-STATES VIDEO AND TRIARCO ARTS \u0026amp; CRAFTS TRIVIA MARKETING TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TROUTMAN OIL CO.,INC. TURNER DAIRY TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC TWIN CITY PRINTING \u0026amp; LITHO INC TWIN CITY TRAILER SALES AND TYLER H LINDSEY US ABLE LIFE US ABLE LIFE US ABLE LIFE US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE/CANCER US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION US FUEL U S FUEL US POSTAL SERVICE U.S. TOY COMPANY INC. UALR UALR UALR READING RECOVERY UAMS UAMS UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COUNTY UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COUNTY UNITED WAY OF PU~ASKI COUNTY UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERVICES UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERVICES UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS T-23 AMOUNT 1,220.28 382.70 31.18 168.20 328.95 19,708.11 2,584.28 15,703.75 2,367.48 617.61 110. 33 128.00 3,526.15 4,211.60 2,764.70 5,811.16 3,859.42 2,874.36 5,607.30 15,793.28 10,734.86 8,347.20 15,254.32 101.84 204.03 204.03 204.03 204.03 204.03 246.85 129.13 1,581.58 152.50 825.64 825.64 4,800.00 20.00 8,340.80 2,500.00 1,496.85 1,039.70 847.14 550.00 548.05 4,935.92 3,335.15 1,865.10 17,540.00 1,150.00 CHK. NO. 57438 57217 57900 57255 57445 57949 58231 57382 57495 57911 57475 57868 57765 57790 58031 57111 57766 58032 58254 57113 57769 58035 58256 57098 57410 57723 57756 58012 58021 57543 57693 57281 57444 57561 57 699 57893 57097 57666 57 670 57597 57746 57812 58140 57527 57951 58132 57835 58191 58192 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AMERICA UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AMERICA UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AMERICA UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES UTILITY BILLING SERVICES VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VALIC-VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE VANDERBILT CENTER FOR SCIENCE VARSITY SPIRIT FASHIONS VICKI STEADMAN VICKI STEADMAN VIRCO MFG. CORPORATION VIRGINIA WALLACE VIVIAN HARRIS W PAUL BLUME WALCH PUBLISHING WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMARTC OMMUN:CTBYR C WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALMART COMMUNITY BRC WALSWORTH PUBLISHING CO. WANDA HAWKINS WANDA HAWKINS WARD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES WARD'S ASBESTOS REMOVAL INC WARDS NATURAL SCIENCE WATERFUL WONDERBEDS WEEKLY READER WEEKLY READER WEST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND WEST MEMPHIS PAPER COMPANY WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES WHITNEY FLETCHER WILLIAM E THRASHER BOYS \u0026amp; WILLIE JACKSON WORLD ALMANAC EDUCATION WORLD ALMANAC EDUCATION XEROX CORPORATION T-24 AMOUNT 3,360.40 3,847.60 2,499.60 5,915.66 598.30 912.26 787.31 3,034.45 825.00 31,719.63 805.00 27,578.63 27,613.63 18,206.13 18,206.13 50.00 4,200.00 131.12 149.29 149.29 67,251.66 20.51 164.42 1,687.50 2,552.38 3,386.51 5,007.70 1,796.04 1,002.53 1,518.42 1,532.97 29,343.08 129.63 100.00 1,694.42 32,850.00 4,250.02 1,175.02 64.14 817.50 217.22 4,161.75 557.37 24.79 500.00 1. 42 105. 42 239.56 997.25 CHK. NO. 57770 57793 58036 57201 57476 57882 58093 58213 57078 57393 57591 57606 57735 57779 57802 57394 57507 58116 57262 57519 57499 57285 57283 58142 57544 57329 57563 57700 57976 58153 58237 57502 57333 57983 57501 58029 57242 57665 57918 58121 57291 57916 57914 57582 57928 V 58250 58111 58221 57640 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JUNE 2006 ACCOUNT YOLANDA GIBSON YOLANDA GIBSON YOUTH HOME INC ZACH BARBER ZEECRAFT TECH AMOUNT 177. 90 4.20 6,490.00 104.00 52.00 CHK. NO. 57547 57967 57508 57231 57312 CHECK TOTALS FOR JUNE 2006 14,054,081.37 CHECK VOIDS FOR JUNE 2006 1,124.50 T-25 BOARD oF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA, ..#~~~ ~ ~~~..., :,\n, ass North Little Rock School District Thursday, September 21, 2006 5:00 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, September 21, 2006 - 5:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Marty Moore, President II. INVOCATION, Kiara Webb, Lynch Drive Elementary Fifth Grader, daughter of Ms. Kengla Webb III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Darrell Montgomery, Member Dorothy Williams, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS 1. Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear A. Indian Hills Elementary Staff and Parents B. NLRSD Maintenance \u0026amp; Custodial Staff 2. New Partners in Education - S. Brazear A. Kroger - Camp Robinson and Ridgeroad Middle Charter B. Treat Automotive U-Haul and Amboy Elementary 3. Special Recognition - S. Brazear A. NLRHS West Campus students in the Apple Program Page 2 - Board Agenda September 21, 2006 VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, August 17, 2006, 2006 5:00 P.M. (Regular)- Page A- 1 B. Thursday, September 7, 2006 5:30 P.M. (Special) - Page A- 5 VII. ACTION ITEMS - UNFINISHED BUSINESS None VIII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Reorganization of the Board of Education - Chairman ___ _ Page B- 1 B. Consider Designation of the Superintendent as the Ex Officio Financial Secretary - Chairman ____ - Page B - 1 C. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - M. Snider D. Consider Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report- G. Tucker E. Consider Elementary Science Textbook Adoption Committee - K. Lowe -Page C-1 F. Consider Spring 2006 Test Data- L. Martin G. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page R- 1 4. Consider building use requests - Page S - 1 5. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 IX. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS None X. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. B. C. Saturday, September 30, 2006 -9:00 A.M. -Board Workshop at J.W. Nutt Company Thursday, October 19, 2006 -6:30 P.M. -ASBA Region 8 Fall Meeting - Cabot High School Thursday, October 26, 2006- 5:00 P.M. Regular Board Meeting XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES August 17, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a regular session on Thursday, August 17, 2006 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. There were no public comments. President Marty Moore called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Fran Jackson, Director of Student Affairs, gave the invocation. The flag salute followed. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Teresa Burl, Member Absent Dorothy Williams, Member Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\npress\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and NLRHS- TV (video) taped the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communications Specialist, presented Rochelle Redus, outgoing Zone 3 Board member, a plaque and thanked her for her six years of service for the students of North Little Rock. Each Board member expressed their appreciation for her work on the Board. Mary \"Cricket\" Hicks, NLRSD International Baccalaureate Coordinator, introduced three of the seven NLRHS West Campus students who received International Baccalaureate diplomas. Wade Fuqua, Nadia Claassen, and Katy Matthews explained their hours earned for college credit and their great scholarships. The Board congratulated and thanked each of them for choosing North Little Rock School District. A....:I. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the minutes of the July 20, 2006 (Regular) meeting as printed. Teresa Burl seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) Scott Teague moved to accept the minutes of the July 31, 2006 (Special) meeting as printed. Trent Cox seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS Energy Education Reports Jerry Massey, Plant Services Director, explained more information would be coming from Energy Education in November or December to fully explain the savings so far. Board members inquired if the city of North Little Rock would be able to give the district a discount on our electricity. Mr. Massey said he would meet with them to explore the possibility: Health Insurance Revisions (Board Policies COE and COE-CL) Greg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer, presented the proposal to increase the district's portion of insurance payment from $240.62 to $264.78. The district will pay the rate increase of the employees' insurance. This is a change to board policy CDE Insurance Coverage for certified personnel and board policy CDE -CL Insurance Coverage for classified personnel. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the revision to Board Policy COE - Insurance Coverage as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: MOTION Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) Trent Cox moved to accept the revision to Board Policy COE - Insurance Coverage as presented. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) Date for Workshop The Board discussed a mutual best date and decided to have their workshop on Saturday, September 16, 2006 at the J.W. Nutt Brokers office on Crestwood in North Little Rock from 9:00 a.m. to I :00 p.m. Board members were requested to send any topics of interest to Mr. Kirspel for him to prepare the agenda for the workshop. Superintendent's Salary Revision MOTION John Riley moved to enter into an executive session. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) The Board entered into an executive session at 6:00 p.m. The Board reconvened in open session at 8:12 p.m. MOTION John Riley moved to increase Ken Kirspel's salary three and a half per cent (3 %)from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Teresa Burl seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel requested approval of the consent agenda as printed. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the consent agenda as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) INFORMATIONAL ITEM Barry Kincl, Health Advisory Committee Chair, advised the Board the committee was meeting regularly and our district is in compliance completely with Act 1220. Mr. Kine! also stated Kevin Danaher, Director of Athletics, Health and Physical Education will be the new chair of the committee beginning in January 2007. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Teresa Burl moved to adjourn the meeting. John Riley seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley and Teague None (Williams - absent) President Moore declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Marty Moore, President NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent SPECIAL MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES September 7, 2006 The North Little Rock School District Board met in a special session on Thursday, September 7, 2006 in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Marty Moore called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Marty Moore, President Trent Cox, Vice President John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott Teague, Disbursing Officer Teresa Burl, Member Dorothy Williams, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation\nGreg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer\nDr. Angela Olsen, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\nother staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary were also present. Billy Duvall taped (audio) the meeting. Report from Certified Personnel Policies Committee Margie Snider, Certified PPC Chair, stated their committee met and unanimously passed the proposed change to Board Policy COE Insurance Coverage increasing the amount from $240.62 to $264.78. The committee will take a vote of the certified employees. Report from Classified Personnel Policies Committee Glenda Tucker, Classified PPC Chair, stated their committee met and unanimously passed the proposed change to Board Policy COE - CL Insurances Coverage increasing the amount paid by the district from $240.62 to $264.78. The committee will take a vote of the classified employees. A-5 2006 - 2007 School Year Budget Greg Daniels, Chief Financial and Information Services Officer, presented the final budget to A the Board for their approval. Mr. Daniels explained adjustments were made and duplications W removed since the budget was originally presented in the July 31, 2006 budget workshop. Board members asked questions of Mr. Daniels and also thanked him for the clarity of his report. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the 2006 - 2007 School Year Budget as presented. Teresa Burl seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: ADJOURNMENT MOTION Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None Dorothy Williams moved to adjourn the meeting. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Burl, Cox, Moore, Riley, Teague and Williams None President Moore declared the meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Marty Moore, President Act 671 of2003 AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE SIGNATURES REQUIRED FOR DISBURSEMENTS BY SCHOOL DISTRICTS\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. SECTION 1. Arkansas Code  6-13-618 is amended to read as follows: 6-13-618. Organization - Disbursing officer. (a) At the first regular meeting following the annual school election, the board of directors of each school district shall organize by electing: (1) One (1) of their number president\n(2) One (1) of their number vice president\nand (3) A secretary who may, but need not be, a member of the board. (b) (1) The board, by resolution adopted by majority vote, shall designate (1) one of its members who shall serve as the primary board disbursing officer of the district. (2) In addition, the board may designate one (1) or more board members as an alternate board disbursing officer in the absence of the designated primary board disbursing officer. (3) Such resolution must be filed with the county treasurer and the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration. (c) No warrant or check, other than food service or activity funds, shall be valid in absence of the following manual or facsimile signatures: (1) The designated board member serving as disbursing officer for the district, or the designated alternate\nand (2) The superintendent of the school district. SECTION 2. Arkansas Code  6-17-918 is amended to read as follows: 6-17-918. Issuing and countersigning warrants. (a) (1) It shall be the duty of the district superintendent of schools to serve as ex officio financial secretary. (2) All warrants and checks shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of 6-13-618(c) and 6-13-701(e). (b) The district superintendent of schools shall neither issue nor countersign any warrants or checks until he has determined that the warrants have been issued in conformity with  6-20-402, this subchapter, and other laws. B-1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TO: KEN KIRSPEL, SUPERINTENDENT FROM: KA YE LOWE, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION SUBJECT: ELEMENTARY SCIENCE/HEALTH TEXTBOOK ADOPTION COMMITTEE ' DA TE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 Recommendation for the Elementary Science/Health Adoption Committee 2006-2007 Name School Grade Michelle Green Meadow Park Kindergarten Mary Carol Copeland Boone Park First Grade Natalie Akin Seventh Street First Grade Laura Showalter Amboy Second Grade Carrie Glover Indian Hills Second Grade Becky Kimbrough Lakewood Third Grade Steve Orobona Park Hill Third Grade Dawn Stane Belwood Fourth Grade Tammy Reeder Glenview Fourth Grade Matthew How North Heights Fifth Grade Renita Parker Pike View Fifth Grade Wanda Mccranie Crestwood Fifth Grade Allison Wesson Lynch Drive Special Ed Resource Sheryll Smith Indian Hills Principal Mary Lou Ferguson Glenview/North Heights Gifted LaCher Rockins Seventh Street Parent Laura Miller Park Hill Parent Paulette Blevins Administration Science Instructional Specialist C-1 I North Little Rock School District ocal Revenue Current Truces Pullback Delinquent Truces Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Truces Tuition-Summer School/Day Care Interest on Investments Soft Drink Sales Misc Rev From Local Total Local Revenue Revenue From Intermediate Source l Severance True Revenue from State Sources-Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Growth Funding 0th Unrestr Grants-in-Aid Revenue from State Sources-Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M - Non-Instr Pgms Misc State Total Revenu estate NUE OPERATIONS d TOTAL REVE Building Fun Capital Outla Food Service Federal TOTAL REVE y s NUE AUGUST 2006 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $12,510,000.00 $827,475.13 $1,542,304.44 $6,250,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,471,000.00 $25,784.28 $66,924.30 $310,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $185,000.00 $19,715.94 $42,422.38 $62,000.00 $795.00 $2,958.36 $105,000.00 ' $7,298.98 $6,998.98 $900,000.00 $90,739.90 $195,969.49 $79,000.00 $2,170.98 $2,170.98 $84,460.00 $38,067.09 $38,277.09 $21,956,460.00 $1,012,047.30 $1,898,026.02 $10,100.001 $0.00! $2,172.99! $35,477,276.00 $3,225,206.00 $3,225,206.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $534,639.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,903,623.00 $236,247.00 $238,076.00 $2,213,250.00 $534,600.00 $612,132.49 $6,980,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $381,715.00 $1,000.00 $189,207.00 $52,500.00 $12,219.34 $12,219.34 $50,545,003.00 $4,009,272.34 $4,276,840.83 $72,511,563.00 $5,021,319.64 $6, 1 TT ,039.84 $233,000.00 $31,256.35 $56,214.03 $1,550,000.00 $65,122.46 $122,819.55 $3,669,000.00 $65,751.97 $66,362.78 $7,181,864.00 $469,133.97 $469, 133.97 $85,145,427.00 $5,652,584.39 $6,891,570.17 0-1 %YTD Budget Balance Actual/Bud $10,967,695.56 12.33% $6,250,000.00 0.00% $1,404,075.70 4.55% $310,000.00 0.00% $142,577.62 22.93% $59,041.64 4.77% $98,001.02 6.67% $704,030.51 21.77% $76,829.02 2.75% $46,182.91 45.32% $20,058,433.98 8.64% $7,927.01! 21.51%! $32,252,070.00 9.09% $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% $534,639.00 0.00% $4,665,547.00 4.86% $1,601,117.51 27.66% $6,980,000.00 0.00% $192,508.00 49.57% $40,280.66 23.27% $46,268,162.17 8.46% $66,334,523.16 8.52% $176,785.97 24.13% $1,427,180.45 7.92% $3,602,637.22 1.81% $6,712,730.03 6.53% $78,253,856.83 8.09% Expenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOT AL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof/f ech Services Purchased Property Services Other Purchased Services Suoolies and Materials Property Other Objects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND BUILDING FUND FEDERAL FUND FOOD SERVICE FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES North Little Rock School District AUGUST 2006 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-0 Actual $37,526,650.00 $793,810.86 $978,274.82 $9,846,135.00 $73,818.13 $107,791.58 $9,779,440.00 $474,447.93 $843,967.17 $3,975,887.00 $120,808.26 $197,002.16 $61,128,112.00 $1,462,885.18 $2,127,035.73 $1,421,058.00 $31,663.10 $130,012.12 $980,780.60 $65,694.83 $82,108.19 $2,600,000.00 $70,652.84 $456,506.10 $4,250,000.00 $774,797.09 $869,097.15 $2,208,614.00 $696, 123.53 $1,390,809.09 $700,000.00 $4,015.00 $15,744.00 $1,110,370.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,270,822.60 $1,642,946.39 $2,944,276.65 $74,398,934.60 $3,105,831.57 $5,071,312.38 $1,791,824.00 $82,085.10 $402,084.53 $5,530,900.00 $447,346.98 $735,412.23 $7,751,725.93 $125,229.96 $148,125.61 $3,212,423.00 $187,869.02 $222,104.76 $92,685,807.53 $3,948,362.63 $6,579,039.51 0-2 %Yid Budget Balance ActuaVBud $36,548,375.18 2.61% $9,738,343.42 1.09% $8,935,472.83 8.63% $3,778,884.84 4.95% $59,001,076.27 3.48% $1,291,045.88 9.15% $898,672.41 8.37% $2,143,493.90 17.56% $3,380,902.85 20.45% $817,804.91 62.97% $684,256.00 2.25% $1,110,370.00 0.00% $10,326,545.95 22.19% $69,327,622.22 6.82% $1,389,739.47 22.44% $4,795,487.77 13.30% $7,603,600.32 1.91% $2,990,318.24 6.91% $86,106,768.02 7.10% Function Category 11 XX Regular Proqrams-Elem/Sec 12XX Special Education 13XX Workforce Education 15XX Compensatory Education 19XX Other Instructional 21XX Suooort Services-Students 22XX Suport Services-Instruction 23XX Suooort Services-Administration 24XX Supoort Services-Sch Admin 25XX Suooort Services-Business 26XX M \u0026amp; 0 Plant Services 27XX Pupil Transportation 28XX Support Services-Central 29.XX Other Support Services 31XX Food Services 33XX Communitv Service Operations 34XX Other Non-Instr Services 43XX Site Improvement Services 5XX Ed Spec Dev Services 46XX Bldg Acq/Constr Services 47XX Building Improvements 51XX LEA Indebtedness 53XX Payment to other LEA 55.XX Indirect Cost/Admin Charges GRAND TOTAL North Little Rock School District FUNCTION  AUGUST 2006 2006-2007 Current Month Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual $28,584,257.10 $830,197.95 $956,886.72 $9,561,331.69 $79,257.10 $80,815.20 $1,564,621.37 $96,678.60 $100,879.80 $4,340,644.20 $5,628.88 $5,628.88 $3,826,038.74 $65,416.14 $88,287.81 $6,055,139.19 $157,720.40 $190,561.38 $5,365,715.06 $224,819.14 $307,250.98 $1,210,728.13 $62,879.41 $114,585.02 $4,039,640.57 $273,935.77 $347,722.04 $1,428,158.93 $127,625.03 $188,845.21 $6,524,519.03 $458,717.21 $1,094,245.55 $3,547,667.77 $103,273.72 $529,407.26 $945,077.33 $82,836.79 $164,628.85 $436,103.89 $0.00 $0.00 $3,997,597.66 $211,812.66 $251,456.42 $47,274.41 $152.01 $209.68 $123,406.25 $9,307.68 $13,869.18 $938,867.80 $80,378.18 $368,443.43 $470.21 $0.00 $0.00 $12,225.33 $0.00 $0.00 $6,402,208.35 $1,075,571.04 $1,773,161.18 $1,923,825.10 $2,154.92 $2,154.92 $1,692,738.14 $0.00 $0.00 $117,551.26 $0.00 $0.00 $92~685,807 .53 $3,948,362.63 $6,579,039.51 0-3 %Yid Budget Balance ActuaVBud $27,627,370.38 3.35% $9,480,516.49 0.85% $1,463,741.57 6.45% $4,335,015.32 0.13% $3,737,750.93 2.31% $5,864,577.81 3.15% $5,058,464.08 5.73% $1,096,143.11 9.46% $3,691,918.53 8.61% $1,239,313.72 13.22% $5,430,273.48 16.77% $3,018,260.51 14.92% $780,448.48 17.42% $436,103.89 0.00% $3,746,141.24 6.29% $47,064.73 0.44% $109,537.07 11.24% $570,424.37 39.24% $470.21 0.00% $12,225.33 0.00% $4,629,047.17 27.70% $1,921,670.18 0.11% $1 ,692, 738.14 0.00% $117,551.26 0.00% $86,106,768.02 7.10% North little Rock School District SOURCE OF FUNDS  AUCUST 2006 Current Month Ytd Source of Funds Category Budget Actual Y-T-D Actual Budget Balance Actual/Bud 000 Non-categorical $67,861, 196.61 $2,492,919.05 $3,995,695.23 $63,865,501.38 5.89% 213 Intensive School Improvement $1,128.49 $0.00 $0.00 $1,128.49 0.00 223 Prof Development Act 59 $419,005.01 $22,762.28 $71,884.32 $347,120.69 17.16% 225 Technology Grant $1,626.91 $0.00 $0.00 $1,626.91 0.00% 227 CPEP $78,552.45 $300.97 $9,758.96 $68,793.49 12.42% 245 Pathwise Mentoring $85,953.48 $1,076.27 $1,076.27 $84,877.21 1.25% 250 Act 591 Residential $48,901.32 $0.00 $0.00 $48,901.32 0.00% 260 Early Childhood Sp Ed $982,979.62 $32,529.35 $42,914.08 $940,065.54 4.37% 271 G/f Advance Placement $4,523.03 $0.00 $0.00 $4,523.03 0.00% 275 Alternative Learning Environment $1,283,801.76 $17,056.45 $26,782.51 $1,257,019.25 2.09% 276 English Lang Learners $36,309.23 $2,982.01 $2,982.01 $33,327.22 8.21% 281 NSLA $2,303,528.84 $39,067.44 $46,443.60 $2,257,085.24 2.02% 365 ABC Preschool $2,409,866.65 $983.12 $4,991.26 $2,404,875.39 0.21% 381 Smart Start Literacy $74,838.77 $5,994.34 $11,310.20 $63,528.57 15.11% 392 General Facility Funding $571,534.22 $59,648.20 $83,606.88 $487,927.34 14.63% 398 OHS Preschool Improvement $940.41 $0.00 $0.00 $940.41 0.00% 401 Academic Fae lmmed Repair $2,111,549.76 $698,090.73 $1,395,680.87 $715,868.89 66.10% 403 Academic Fae Transitional Pgrn $4,878,659.39 $447,346.98 $735,412.23 $4,143,247.16 15.07% 404 Academic Fae Partnership Pgrn $322,654.70 $0.00 $0.00 $322,654.70 0.00% 406 lmprv Lit Thru Libraries $4,123.22 $774.74 $774.74 $3,348.48 18.79% 430 ROTC $119,009.84 $7,762.46 $7,762.46 $111,247.38 6.52% 441 Title IV-B 21st Century $193,747.24 $10,877.64 $14,826.04 $178,921.20 7.65% 501 Title I-Reg Comp Ed $4,106,564.85 $13,158.56 $20,978.65 $4,085,586.20 0.51% 520 Title V-A Innovative Program $9,404.10 $0.00 $0.00 $9,404.10 0.00% 523 Title I Reading First $294,198.13 $5,336.55 $5,336.55 $288,861.58 1.81% 530 Homeless-Stewart McKinney $34,795.17 $549.23 $4,146.73 $30,648.44 11.92% 535 Title V-B Charter Schools $47,678.79 $4,865.04 $4,865.04 $42,813.75 10.20% 565 Teacher Quality Enhancement . $67,652.16 $0.00 $0.00 $67,652.16 0.00% 570 Cart Perkins Vocational $202,278.45 $2,514.18 $6,715.38 $195,563.07 3.32% 702 Title VI-B PL 94-142 $1,798,865.29 $7,279.01 $7,279.01 $1,791,586.28 0.40% 710 Sp Ed Preschool Sec 619 $879,728.52 $50,013.09 $50,753.18 $828,975.34 5.77% 750 Medicaid $169,627.41 $819.56 $1,619.56 $168,007.85 0.95% 751 Medicaid Sp Ed Preschool $79,934.86 $5,694.49 $5,694.49 $74,240.37 7.12% 754 Javits - G/f Grant $9,404.10 $0.00 $0.00 $9,404.10 0.00% 756 Title II-A Improve Teaching $889,854.57 $12,189.75 $13,978.12 $875,876.45 1.57% 761 Title Ill Eng Lang Acqui $17,658.08 $985.00 $985.00 $16,673.08 5.58% 781 Title IV-A Drug Ed $56,080.41 $0.00 $0.00 $56,080.41 0.00% 785 Comprehensive Sch Health $14,952.53 $2,410.66 $2,410.66 $12,541.87 16.12% 796 Workforce Investment Act $25,861.28 $0.00 $0.00 $25,861.28 0.00% 995 Soft Drink Acct $186,837.85 $2,375.48 $2,375.48 $184,462.37 1.27% GRAND TOTAL $92,685,807.53 $3,948,362.63 $6,579,039.51 $86,106,768.02 7.10% $80,000,000.00 $70,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 NLRSD Actual to Budget Comparison As of August, 2006 Operating Building Capital Outlay Funds 0-5 Federal Food Service  Budget  Expenses Shanda Coleman Christopher Sierra NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Board Agenda - September 21, 2006 NEW ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Lynch Drive Elementary, Assistant Principal Effective 9/22/06, Category I, Step 4, 207 days NLRHS East Campus, Assistant Principal Effective 9/8/06, Category I, Step 3, 207 days NEW ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATION NAME: Shanda Coleman PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT: Lynch Drive Elementary, Assistant Principal\nEDUCATION: BA- Harding University, Searcy, AR 5/03 MA- Harding University, Searcy, AR 6/05 LICENSURE: Standard 5 year- Elementary 106 Initial three year - Building Administrator P-8 EXPERIENCE: Park Avenue Elementary, Assistant Principal, Stuttgart, AR 7/05 -8/06 Clary Elementary, Stuttgart, AR 8/00 - 6/05 RECOMMENDATION: Loretta Hassell, Lynch Drive Elementary Kaye Lowe, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Gregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Personnel NAME:\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_971","title":"'The Status of the North Little Rock School District's Implementation of the Desegregation Plan''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2006-03-13"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","School discipline","School employees","School enrollment","School facilities","School improvement programs","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Gifted persons","School buildings"],"dcterms_title":["'The Status of the North Little Rock School District's Implementation of the Desegregation Plan''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/971"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":2,"next_page":3,"prev_page":1,"total_pages":35,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":12,"total_count":419,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":418},{"value":"StillImage","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":60},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":42},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":23},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":5},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"Arkansas Policy Foundation","hits":2},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":2},{"value":"Quality Education and Management Associates","hits":2},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":419},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":413},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":307},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":287},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":280},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":229},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":204},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":174},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Student assistance programs","hits":139},{"value":"School integration","hits":138}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":417},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":415},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":411},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":405},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Phillips County, 34.42829, -90.84802","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Connecticut, 41.66704, -72.66648","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Maryland, 39.00039, -76.74997","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Michigan, 44.25029, -85.50033","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":415},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Missouri","hits":1},{"value":"Texas","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1995","hits":88},{"value":"1993","hits":74},{"value":"1994","hits":74},{"value":"1996","hits":72},{"value":"1992","hits":64},{"value":"1999","hits":59},{"value":"2001","hits":59},{"value":"1997","hits":58},{"value":"1991","hits":53},{"value":"2003","hits":53},{"value":"2000","hits":52},{"value":"1990","hits":40},{"value":"1998","hits":40},{"value":"2004","hits":40},{"value":"2002","hits":38},{"value":"1989","hits":33},{"value":"2005","hits":31},{"value":"2006","hits":21},{"value":"1986","hits":10},{"value":"1988","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"2007","hits":8},{"value":"2008","hits":8},{"value":"1987","hits":7},{"value":"2010","hits":7},{"value":"1985","hits":6},{"value":"2009","hits":6},{"value":"2011","hits":6},{"value":"1980","hits":5},{"value":"1981","hits":5},{"value":"1982","hits":5},{"value":"1983","hits":5},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"2012","hits":4},{"value":"1950","hits":3},{"value":"1951","hits":3},{"value":"1952","hits":3},{"value":"1953","hits":3},{"value":"1954","hits":3},{"value":"1955","hits":3},{"value":"1956","hits":3},{"value":"1957","hits":3},{"value":"1958","hits":3},{"value":"1959","hits":3},{"value":"1960","hits":3},{"value":"1961","hits":3},{"value":"1962","hits":3},{"value":"1963","hits":3},{"value":"1964","hits":3},{"value":"1965","hits":3},{"value":"1966","hits":3},{"value":"1967","hits":3},{"value":"1968","hits":3},{"value":"1969","hits":3},{"value":"1970","hits":3},{"value":"1971","hits":3},{"value":"1972","hits":3},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"2013","hits":3},{"value":"2014","hits":3},{"value":"2015","hits":2},{"value":"2016","hits":2},{"value":"2017","hits":2},{"value":"2018","hits":2},{"value":"2019","hits":2},{"value":"2020","hits":2},{"value":"2021","hits":2},{"value":"2022","hits":2},{"value":"2023","hits":2},{"value":"2024","hits":2},{"value":"1910","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1910","max":"2024","count":1171,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":244},{"value":"reports","hits":71},{"value":"legal documents","hits":38},{"value":"judicial records","hits":36},{"value":"correspondence","hits":10},{"value":"handbooks","hits":9},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":7},{"value":"budgets","hits":6},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":417},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Photographs Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":418},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}