{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1689","title":"Court filings concerning LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants, and ODM report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1998-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School integration","School enrollment","School improvement programs","School facilities","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants, and ODM report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1689"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["111 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, order; District Court, joint motion of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and Joshua for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, memorandum brief in support of joint motion of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and Joshua for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, two orders; District Court, districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants; District Court, addendum to districts' supplement to past and pending claims against the state defendants; District Court, order; District Court, memorandum opinion and order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''1997-98 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Pulaski County School Districts''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education project management tool  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * * FILED EA U.S. DISTRICT COURT STERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS JAN I 2 1998 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * RECEIVED Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. , * J.i\\i I } 3 1998 Intervenors, * * OFFICE OF KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * DESES.REGATICN MONITORlrJG Intervenors. * ORDER Before the Court is a motion filed by the Pulaski County Special School District - (\"PCSSD\") requesting that this Court grant summary judgment on the issue of the state funding formula. 1 The Arkansas Department of Education (\" ADE\") has responded to the PCSSD's motion.2 After carefully considering the motion and the response, this Court denies the PCSSD's motion for summary judgment on the issue of the state funding formula. Summary judgment is appropriate when \"the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the. affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material- fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.\" Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This Court concludes that there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding the state funding formula. 1 Docket No. 3042. 2 Docket No. 3051. 104 Previously, this Court entered Orders granting summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions, 3 granting summary judgment on the issue of health insurance, and denying summary judgment as to special education and loss funding. 4 Currently, several of these issues are on appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eighth Circuit has yet to rule, and therefore, these issues remain unresolved. These unresolved issues relate to the issues raised by the PCSSD in its current motion for summary judgment pending before this Court. Furthermore, although not of record in this case, recent newspaper reports indicate that certain aspects of the funding formula are still being litigated in Arkansas state court. See Cynthia Howell, Lawyers Seek to Delay Trial in School Funding Suit, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Jan. 8, 1998, at 2B. Because there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute regarding the state funding formula, this Court denies the PCSSD's current motion for summary judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS ff\\._day of January 1998. 3 Docket No. 2930. 4 Docket No. 2968. ~ ~,4t.1 UNITED STA ~ISTRICTJ GE fHfS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCk:ET SHEET IN COUPUANCE ~ RULE 5e ANOOA 7'9(8) FACP ON 1//t;;. ~ . IV  l/l1 :_ 2 MICHAEL E. GANS - Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT \u0026 CUSTOM HOUSE 1114 MARKET STREET ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63101 January 16, 1998 VOICE (314) 539-3600 ABBS (BOO) 652-8671 Is. wustt.edu/Sth.cir RECEIVED Mr. Jim McCormack Clerk U.S. DIS1RICT COURT, EASTERN ARKANSAS Room 402 600 W. Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201-3325 JAN 2 1 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORINQ Re : 96-2047EALR L.R. School Dist. vs. Servicemaster Manag. Dear Clerk: The mandate of this Court is enclosed together with a receipt. Will the clerk of the district court please sign, date and return the receipt to this office. w~~~rt.~ Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court led Enclosure( s) District Court Clerk-Re : Files _x_Enclosed please find : 1 vol. 1R {J)a-J.nor- ~~e_J\\ 'Wt/!(J,,:m,Jj;) ( LETIER FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY) cc: Christopher John Heller Joseph Steven Mowery John C. Everett Samuel Arnold Perroni William Henry Trice III Richard Wilson Roachell John W. Walker Robert Pressman Norman J . Chachkin Philip K. Lyon M. Samuel Jones III Nelwyn Leone Davis Tim C. Humphries Office of Desegregation Monitor Horace Alvin Walker Perlesta Arthur Hollingsworth Kenneth G. Torrence Otis Henr y Storey District Court/Agency Case Number(s) : 82-CV -866 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~Q~t l~Ti:llCT cfJRT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS 1 111 ~ D,S I RI T Ar- '\\, N~\u003clS WESTERN DIVISION JAN 2 1 1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT J,%1~S WM CORMACK, Cl r:-r:i:\u003c B;:: PLAmTIFF O::? C~~ .~ v. LR-C-82-866 RECEIVED PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL JAN 2 3 1998 DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS OFFICE Of KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DESEGREGATION MONITORING INTERVENORS JOINT MOTION OF LRSD AND JOSHUA FOR APPROVAL OF LRSD'S REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Plainti.,ff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") for their Joint Motion For Approval_ of - LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan state: 1. Joshua and LRSD move for tentative and, ultimately, fina l approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (attached hereto as Exhibit A). 2. On September 26, 1997, LRSD submitted and requested approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated  September 18, 1997. Following submission, LRSD and Joshua engaged in extensive negotiations in an effort to develop a revised plan which both parties could support. Those negotiations resulted in LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1998 (\"January 16 Revised Plan\"). On that date, counsel for Joshua confirmed in writing Joshua's agreement to support approval of the January 16 Revised Plan. See Exhibit B. Also on that same date, the LRSD Board of Directors approved the Janua~y 16 Revised Plan and authorized submission of the plan to this Court for approval. 3. LRSD and Joshua stipulate to the following facts in support of this Motion: a. that the record in this case supports modification of LRSD's desegregation obligations; b. that the January 16 Revised Plan is an appropriate modification of LRSD's desegregation obligations; c. that the January 16 Revised Plan is constitutional, workable and fair to Joshua class members; and, d. that, if LRSD substantially complies with its obligations under the January 16 Revised Plan during its term and implements in good faith the programs, policies and procedures related thereto, LRSD will be unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations at the end of the 2000-01 school year. 4. As a part of the compromise and settlement between LRSD and Joshua, Joshua has agreed that they will request that the Court of Appeals for the Eighth circuit hold their two pending appeals in abeyance, and LRSD and Joshua have further agreed that they will attempt to resolve Joshua's past, present and future claims for attorneys' fees and costs by mediation. 5. LRSD and Joshua recognize that their compromise and settlement cannot be approved by this Court without notice to Joshua class members. ~ Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). Accordingly, LRSD and Joshua propose dissemination of the notice attached hereto as Exhibit c. This notice shall be published no less than thirty (30) days before a deadline established by this Court for Joshua 2 class members to submit written objections to approval of the January 16 Revised Plan. LRSD shall bear all costs associated with publication of the notice. LRSD shall cause the notice to be published in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; shall print and distribute copies of the notice to teachers; shall prominently post the notice at all. school; and shall cause the notice to be broadcast over the cable television channel controlled by LRSD. 6. In light of their agreement, LRSD and Joshua respectfully request that the hearing currently scheduled for the week of February 2, 1998 be cancelled.  7. LRSD and Joshua have prepared for the Court's consideration an Order (attached hereto) granting the relief sought in this Motion. WHEREFORE, LRSD and Joshua pray that this Court tentatively approve LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1997, pending the filing of objections filed by Joshua class members; that the notice attached hereto as Exhibit c be published at least thirty (30) days the deadline for Joshua class members to submit written objections; that the hearing currently scheduled for the week of February 2, 1998 be cancelled; and that this Court . finally approve LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan dated January 16, 1997 upon consideration of any objections filed by Joshua class members. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS 3 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE, CLARK First Commercial Bldg., Suite 2000 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 s. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 374-3758 BY: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following pe?jes~ depositing a copy of same in the United states mail on this day of January, 1998. Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 w. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 General 4 SBC'l'IOII 1: Little Rock . School District Revised Desegregation and Education Plan January 16, 1998 Prior Agreements and Orders. 1.1. This Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") with the following exceptions: a. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 2 8 , 1989 (\"Settlement Agreement\"); b. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; c. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; d. The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; and, e. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting or enforcing sections a. through d. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Revised Plan. 1. 2. This Revised Plan does not affect the Joshua Intervenors' (\"Joshua's\") right to enforce the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan with respect to the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") and the North Little ' Rock School District (\"NLRSD\"). 1.3. Although this Revised Plan supersedes the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan, LRSD expects to continue to work cooperatively with PCSSD and NLRSD in the areas addressed by the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. \"i' EXHIBIT I A SBCTXOH 2: Obligations. 2.1. LRSD shall in good faith exercise its best efforts to comply with the Constitution, to remedy the effects of past discrimination by LRSD against African-American students, to ensure , that no person is discriminated against on the basis of race, color or ethnicity in the operation of LRSD and to provide an equal educational opportunity for all students attending LRSD schools. 2.1.1. LRSD shall retain a desegregation and/or education expert approved by Joshua to work with LRSD in the development of the programs, policies and procedures to be implemented in accordance with this Revised Plan and to assist LRSD in devising remedies to problems concerning desegregation or racial discrimination which adversely affect African-American students. 2. 2. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure that LRSD hires, assigns, utilizes and promotes qualified African-Americans in ' a fair and equitable manner. 2.2.1. LRSD shall maintain in place its current policies and practices relating to the recruitment of AfricanAmerican teachers which have allowed LRSD to maintain a teaching staff which is approximately one-third African-American. 2.2.2. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to increase the number of African-American media specialists, guidance counselors, early childhood teachers, primary grade teachers and secondary core subject teachers, including offering incentives for African-American teachers to obtain certification in these areas, and to assign those teachers 2 to the LRSD schools where the greatest disparity exists. 2,2.3. LRSD shall establish a uniform salary schedule for all positions within the district, including a salary range for director and associate and assistant superintendent positions, designed to provide compensation in accordance with qualifications and to minimize complaints of favoritism. 2.2.4. LRSD shall implement a policy for the centralized hiring and assignment of teachers by the LRSD Human Resources Department designed to provide an equitable distribution of teaching resources and to prevent nepotism and preselection by a school principal. 2.2.s. LRSD shall implement a policy of promotion from within which shall include procedures for notifying district employees of open positions. 2.2.6. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that the teaching staffs at all LRSD schools are substantially similar with regard to average years of experience and percentage of teachers with advanced degrees. 2.2.7. LRSD sha,l l negotiate with the Knight Intervenors to establish a procedure for the mandatory reassignment of teachers as necessary to enable LRSD to meet its obligations under Section 2.2 of this Revised Plan. 2.3. LRSD shall implement student assignment programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure the desegregation of LRSD schools to the extent practicable, including but not limited to Sections 3 and 4 of this Revised Plan. 3 2. 4. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination in the referral and placement of students in special education or in other programs designed to meet special student needs. 2. 5. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination with regard to student discipline. 2.5.1. LRSD shall strictly adhere to the policies set forth in the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook to ensure that all students are disciplined in a fair and equitable manner. 2.5.2. LRSD shall purge students' discipline records after the fifth grade and eighth grade of all offenses, except weapons offenses, arson and robbery, unless LRSD finds that to do so would not be in the best interest of the student. 2.5.3. LRSD shall establish the position of \"ombudsman\" the job description for which shall include the following responsibilities: ensuring that students are aware of their rights pursuant to the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook, acting as an advocate on behalf of students involved in the discipline process, investigating parent and student complaints of race-based mistreatment and attempting to achieve equitable solutions. 2.5.4. LRSD shall work with students and their parents to develop behavior modification plans for students who exhibit frequent misbehavior. 2. 6. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures 4 . I designed to promote participation and to ensure that there are no barriers to participation by qualified African-Americans in extracurricular activities, advanced placement courses, honors and enriched courses and the gifted and talented program. 2.6.1. LRSD shall implement a training program during each of the next three years designed to assist teachers and counselors in identifying and encouraging African-American students to participate in honors and enriched courses and advanced placement courses. 2.6.2. LRSD shall implement programs to assist African-American students in being successful in honors and enriched courses and advanced placement courses. LRSD shall provide transportation to students otherwise eligible for transportation to school to allow those students to participate in after-school activities required for participation in an extra-curricular activity. 2. 7. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to improve and remediate the academic achievement of African-American students, including but not limited to Section 5 of this Revised Plan. 2. 7.1. LRSD shall assess the academic programs implemented pursuant to Section 2.7 after each year in order to determine the effectiveness of the academic programs in improving African-American achievement. If this assessment reveals that a program has not and likely will not improve African-American achievement, LRSD shall take appropriate action in the form of ( - 5 either modifying how the program is implemented or replacing the program. 2. 8. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures during each of the next three years designed to promote and encourage parental and community involvement and support in the operation of LRSD and the education of LRSD students. 2. 9. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/ or procedures designed to ensure an equitable allocation and/or reallocation of financial, technological and educational resources to LRSD schools. 2. 9. 1. Within 60 days of the district court's approval of this Revised Plan, LRSD, after consultation with Joshua, will develop a process or standard for assessing the equitable allocation of resources. 2.9.2. Within 180 days of the district court's approval of this Revised Plan, LRSD shall report by school the results of its assessment of the allocation of resources. 2.10. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure the equitable maintenance and repair of LRSD facilities. 2.11. LRSD shall implement programs, procedures designed to ensure that there discrimination in the services. provision of guidance policies and/or is no racial and counseling 2 .11. 1. Guidance counselors shall work with students in an effort to provide for more equity in academic honors, awards and scholarships. 6 2.12. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that every LRSD school provides its students a learning environment free from discrimination. 2 .12. 1. LRSD shall implement a training program through the United States Department of Justice, the Arkansas Department of Education and/or the National Conference of Christians and Jews in prejudice reduction and cultural sensitivity. 2.12.2. LRSD shall implement policies and procedures for investigating the cause of racial disparities in programs and activities and developing remedies where appropriate. 2.13. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure LRSD substantially complies with its obligations  under this Revised Plan. 2.13.1 The LRSD Superintendent shall be responsible for overseeing LRSD's compliance with this Revised Plan in accordance Section 6. SECTION 3: Student Assignments. 3.1. Attendance Zones. While this Revised Plan does not require any sudden or drastic changes to the present student assignment plan, LRSD attendance zones may be redrawn in accordance with the following guidelines: 3.1.1. Satellite Zones. attendance zones where the impact LRSD may eliminate satellite would be to reduce the transportation burden on African-American students; 3. 1. 2. Neighborhood Schools. LRSD may assign students 7 to area1 elementary and junior high/middle schools based on reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zones drawn to create as many truly desegregated schools (from forty to sixty percent African-American) as reasonably practicable, except as provided in Section 3.1.3. below; 3.1.3. Exception. Where a reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zone will result in an elementary or junior high/middle school which is less than twenty percent AfricanAmerican, LRSD reserves the right to either: a. Draw the attendance zone at less than full capacity to allow for the voluntary transfer of African-American students to the school; or, b. Create one or more satellite attendance zones of primarily African-American students. If a satellite zone is established, it shall be of su'f ficient size to ensure substantial desegregation at the school. 3. 1.4. High Schools. LRSD may assign students to area high schools based on attendance zones drawn so that the percentage of African-American students at each high school shall be within plus or minus twenty percentage points from the percentage of African-American students for high schools as a whole and so that, to the extent practicable, a stable and predictable feeder pattern exists from LRSD junior high/middle schools. 3.2. Voluntary student Transfers. Beginning in the 1998-99 1The term \"area\" school shall refer to all LRSD schools except magnet and interdistrict schools. 8 school year, the following guidelines shall govern voluntary student transfers: 3.2.1. Desegregation Transfers. LRSD students whose race constitutes more than sixty percent of the population at their attendance zone school shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school where their race constitutes le~s than forty percent of the student population subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3. 2. 2. Racial Isolation Transfer. LRSD students whose attendance zone school is a one race, African-American school (~ 90% African-American) shall be permitted to transfer to a racially balanced LRSD area school subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.3. Magnet Program Transfer. LRSD students shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school to participate in a designated magnet program subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.4. Employees' ,Child Transfer. LRSD employees who reside in the LRSD may choose to have their children attend the same school or campus at which the employee works, not including Magnet schools, subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3. 2. 5. Special circumstances Transfer. Upon a showing of a special need arising out of circumstances unique to a particular student, a student may, at the sole discretion of LRSD, be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school subject to 9 capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3.2.6. outside students. LRSD schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will improve the racial balance of the district as a whole and of the school to which the student wishes to transfer and subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; and, 3.2.7. Transportation . LRSD shall provide transportation to voluntary transfer students with the following ,. exceptions: (i) employee's child transfers, (ii) special circumstances transfers, and (iii) transfers from outside Pulaski County. 3.3. Magnet Programs. The designated magnet programs at this time are the following: a. Rockefeller Early Childhood Program; b. King High Intensity Learning Program; c. Washington Math Science Program; d. Henderson Health Science Program; e. Dunbar International Studies/Gifted and Talented Program; ,. f. Central International Studies Program; and, g. McClellan Business Communications Program. LRSD reserves the right to modify or discontinue designated magnet programs and to establish new magnet programs. However, LRSD agrees that during the term of this Revised Plan it will not modify 10 or discontinue a magnet program which is successful. 3.4. Middle Schools. LR.SD shall establish a schedule for the orderly conversion of some or'all of its junior high schools to middle schools for grades six, seven and eight and move the ninth grade to high schools. As a part of this conversion, LRSD reserves the right to chan9e the grade level structure at all of its schools, including magnet schools. 3. 5. Ninth Grade Schools. Because of limited capacity at LRSD's high schools, it may be necessary as a part of the orderly conversion to middle schools to establish two or more schools composed entirely of ninth grade students. If so, LRSD shall assign students to the ninth grade schools based on attendance zones drawn so that the percentage of African-American students at each ninth grade school shall be within plus or minus ten percentage points from the district-wide percentage of ninth grade African-American students. 3.6. School Construction/Closing. LRSD shall construct at least two new area elementary schools, one in west Little Rock and one at the site of the former Stephens school. When the new Stephens Elementary opens, it shall receive additional funding as described in Section 5.5 of this Revised Plan and one or more of the schools identified in Section 5.5 will be closed. When a school identified in Section 5.5 is closed, LRSD shall exercise its best efforts to find a community or educational use for the property. Otherwise, LRSD sI+all not seek to close schools in African-American neighborhoods solely because of age or poor 11 maintenance except when a new school will be located in the same general area. 3.7. Modification Standard. During the term of this Revised Plan, LRSD shall not recommend modifications to attendance zones or grade level structure or the construction, enlargement or closing of a schools other than as provided in this Revised Plan unless: 3.7.1. Such action would further the goal of desegregating LRSD or eliminating the vestiges of discrimination to the extent practicable; or, past 3.7.2. The LRSD Board of Directors determines ( i) that the educational benefits expected from such action substantially outweigh any adverse effects of the proposed action, (ii) that no practical alternative to the proposed action exists which will accomplish the educational objective, and (iii) that to the extent practicable measures will be initiated to counteract any adverse affects of the proposed action. 3.8. Racial Balance. This Revised Plan recognizes that the ,. desegregation of LRSD to the extent practicable does not require that every LRSD school be racially balanced. Accordingly, nothing in this Revised Plan shall be construed as requiring a particular racial balance at every LRSD school or as obligating LRSD to recruit students to obtain a particular racial balance in every LRSD school. 3.9. Housing. LRSD and Joshua co:mmi t to promote housing desegregation within segregated neighborhoods. They pledge to work together and use their best efforts to dismantle, and prevent 12  recurrence of, segregated housing patterns. SBC'l'IO 4: Interdistrict schools. LRSD and PCSSD shall operate Interdistrict Schools in accordance with the following: 4.1. PCSSD Interdistrict Schools. PCSSD shall operate Baker Elementary, Clinton Elementary, Crystal Hill Elementary and any new elementary school constructed in Chenal Valley as Interdistrict Schools; 4. 2. LRSD Interdistrict Schools. LRSD shall operate King Elementary, Romine Elementary and Washington Elementary as Interdistrict Schools; 4. 3. Racial Composition. The ideal composition at interdistrict schools shall be as close to 50%-50% as possible with the majority race of the host district remaining the majority race at the Interdistrict School; 4.4. Reserved Seats. PCSSD shall reserve at least 200 seats at Clinton Elementary and up to 399 seats at Crystal Hill Elementary for interdistrict transfer students from LRSD; 4.5. Recruitment. LRSD and PCSSD agree to implement programs at Interdistrict Schools designed to attract interdistrict transfers and to work cooperatively to recruit interdistrict transfers to Interdistrict Schools; 4.6. Outside Students. Interdistrict Schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will assist the Interdistrict School in achieving its ideal racial composition; and, 13 4. 7. Transportation. Transportation shall be provided by the home district for interdistric, t transfers from Pulaski County to Interdistrict Schools. \u0026BCTIOB s: student Achievement. 5.1. Early Childhood Education. LRSD shall implement an early childhood education program which shall include a HIPPY program and a four year-old program with no less than 720 seats. LRSD contemplates that the four yearold classes will remain at their present sites or in the same general location. 5.2. Reading/Language Arts. 5.2.1. Primary Grades. LRSD shall implement at least the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in kindergarten through the third grade: a. Establish as a goal2 that by the completion of the third grade all students will be reading independently and show understanding of words on a page; b. Focus teaching efforts on reading/language arts instruction by teaching science and social studies content through _ reading/language arts and mathematics experiences; c. Promote thematic instruction; 2The identification of specific goals in this Revised Plan is not intended to create an obligation that LRSD shall have fully met the goal by the end of the plan's term. LRSD's failure to obtain any of the goals of this Revised Plan will not be considered a failure to comply with the plan if LRSD followed the strategies described in the plan and the policies, practices and procedures developed in accordance with the plan. 14 d. Identify clear objectives for student mastery of all three reading cueing systems (phonics, semantics and syntax) and of knowing-how-to-learn skills; e. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; f. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts and mathematics instruction; g. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; h. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement in order to help facilitate the academic development of the students; i. Provide pre-kindergarten, kindergarten and first grade learning readiness experiences for students who come to school without such experiences; j. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all students in diverse, mainstreamed classrooms; k. Use the third and/or fourth grade as a transition year from focused reading/language arts and mathematics instruction to a more traditional school day; and, 1. Provide opportunities for students to perform and display their academic training in a public setting. 5. 2. 2. Intermediate Grades. LRSD intends to implement at least the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in grades four through six: 15 ,. ,. a. Adopt as a goal that by completion of the sixth grade all students will master and use daily higher level reading comprehension skills for learning in all subject areas, for making meaning in real life experiences and for personal growth and enjoyment; b. Promote thematic instruction; c. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts, mathematics, science and social studies instruction;  d. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; e. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; f. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement in order to help facilitate the academic development of the students; g. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all  "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1483","title":"\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Standards","Education--Finance","Education--Curricula","School enrollment","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration","Parents","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1483"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["69 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1691","title":"Court filings: District Court, plaintiff Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) answers to the Joshua intervenors' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1997-12-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, plaintiff Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) answers to the Joshua intervenors' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1691"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["155 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. vs. LR-C-82-866 PLAINTIFFS :~~~~I COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICTRECEIVED DEFENDANTS MRS . LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEC ~ 1997 OFFICE OF PLAINTIFF LRSD, s AKiii~Ti MONITORING INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING LRSD'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Plaintiff Little Rock School District ( \"LRSD\") for its Answers to The Joshua Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents states: INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please state the name, title, address and telephone number of each and every individual assisting in the preparation of the answers to these interrogatories. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory requests information which is privileged under the work product doctrine and/or the attorney-client privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the following persons assisted in the preparation of these answers: Dr. Les Carnine, Christopher Heller and John c. Fendley, Jr. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: In 15 instances in paragraphs II. B. through II. P. of the proposed new plan, the words \"LRSD shall implement programs policies and/or procedures\" followed by a particular subject matter appear. Please identify separately for l:lhomollct'd lcy\\lrod'dco-joob.ra  ' . each of these 15 paragraphs all programs, policies and procedures - which you maintain are currently implemented and are intended to be encompassed by the reference in the particular subparagraph of Part II. of the proposed plan. In addition, please specify when the implementation of the particular program, policy or procedure began. Lastly, as to each sub-paragraph, please indicate whether work is underway to develop a particular program, policy or procedure to implement the obligation and, if so, describe generally the nature of the initiative(s) and the anticipated completion date(s). ANSWER: Except as otherwise provided in LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\"), the obligations set forth in Section II were not intended to encompass any particular program, policy and procedure currently being implemented. As stated in Section XI of the Revised Plan, the 1997-98 school year will be a transition year in preparation for implementation of the Revised Plan during the 1998-99 school year. During the transition year, LRSD will be evaluating current programs, policies and procedures and developing new programs, policies and procedures to be implemented in order to meet its obligations under the Revised Plan. Some of this work has already been completed and is contained in the work team reports submitted to the LRSD Board of Directors in August of this year. INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Please explain the reason(s) that the proposed plan does not include in the 15 instances referred to in Interrogatory No. 2, or in any instance, the identification of the l:lh:\u003en-cllcndlcylll'ld'doo-jooh.,.. 2 particular programs, policies and procedures to be implemented. (If LRSD believes that there is identification of a particular standard in one or more instances, please answer as to obligations where you agree that there is no identification of a particular standard or program). ANSWER: The Revised Plan includes specific programs, policies and/or procedures with regard to student assignments (Section III \u0026 IV), African-American academic achievement (Section V), equitable allocation of certified personnel (Section VI) and compliance (Section VII). With regard to the remaining obligations, LRSD believes that, in order for the Revised Plan to be successful, the details related to implementation of the Revised Plan must be subject to modification without district court involvement. LRSD firmly believes that flexibility is essential to instilling in the - qistrict a sense of responsibility and accountability. INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Would the system refuse to support adoption of the revised plan if the plan included the identification of particular programs, policies and/or procedures, or other steps, to implement the \"obligations\" identified in Part II? If so, explain the reason(s) for the system's pos i tion. ANSWER: The Revised Plan does identify particular programs, policies and/or procedures. See Answer to Interrogatory No. 3. INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Do you agree that as written, there would be compliance with the provisions of II.B. through II.P. of the proposed plan if the system implemented, as to the particular sub-paragraph, programs or policies or procedures regarding the r:lhom,lr\u003cndlcyllr\u003e\u003cl'dca-jah.ra 3 particular matter addressed in the paragraph. If the answer is negative, please explain the basis for the answer. ANSWER: Yes. INTERROGATORY NO. 6: As the plan is written, would the court have the authority, in the opinion of the LRSD, to hold a system official (s) (sic] in contempt of court for failure to implement a term of a particular policy of the district, which the LRSD views as encompassed by one of the sub-paragraphs in II.B. through II.P. of the plan, but which is not specified in the plan. If your answer is in the affirmative, please explain the basis for the answer. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory calls for the legal opinion of counsel for LRSD which is privileged under the attorneyclient privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the district court would have authority to enforce the Revised Plan using its contempt power. INTERROGATORY NO. 7: As the plan is written, does any provision of paragraphs II.B. through II.P. of the plan require any action on the part of the LRSD if at a particular school there is substantial racial disparity, atypical in the LRSD system, in the numbers of black students suspended, the numbers of black males placed in special education classes, or the numbers of black students in the gifted and talented program. If the answer is affirmative, please identify the provision(s) which is the basis of the answer. (:\\homolfcndlcyllndldoojooh.,.. 4 ANSWER: Paragraphs G., H. and I. of Section II state LRSD's obligations with regard to special education, student discipline and gifted and talented, respectively. Compliance with these paragraphs would require LRSD to investigate a racial disparity which varies substantially from what would be expected. INTERROGATORY NO. 8: Do you maintain that the .LRSD complies, currently, with each obligation set forth in Part II. of the plan. If not, please describe in detail the area(s) of noncompliance. ANSWER: The obligations set forth in Section II encompass the core obligations from LRSD' s current desegregation plan. LRSD maintains that it has substantially complied with its current desegregation plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 9: With respect to II.B. of the proposed plan, please identify as to each category of positions to which it applies, the proportion black in the relevant labor market and the source of this information, and the proportion black of the work force at present. ANSWER: LRSD intends to rely on federal EEOC statistics for Pulaski County, the State of Arkansas and the nation as a whole to determine the percentage of qualified African-Americans in the relevant labor market. With regard to the proportion of AfricanAmerican teachers and administrators, see Exhibits A, B and C attached. LRSD' s noncertified personnel is 73. 8% African-American. INTERROGATORY NO. 10: With respect to II.C. of the proposed plan, please identify as to each category of positions to which it applies, the meaning of the words \"the pool of candidates eligible f:lhomolfcndlcyllnd'dc.-jc,oh.1W 5 for promotion\", the proportion black in that pool and the source of the information, and the proportion black of the persons employed in the category at present. ANSWER: The \"pool of candidates eligible for promotion\" includes current employees who satisfy all eligibility requirements imposed by law or by the Board for a position. LRSD objects to identifying every position for which every employee is currently eligible for promotion as unduly burdensome. With regard to the percentage of African-Americans currently employed by LRSD, see Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. INTERROGATORY NO. 11: With respect to II.D. of the proposed plan, please identify the positions covered within the term \"certified personnel\" and provide as to each category the number of persons currently employed in the LRSD by race. ANSWER: \"Certified personnel\" are LRSD employees who must possess teaching or administrative certificates issued by the State of Arkansas in order to hold their position. With regard to the percentage of African-Americans currently employed by LRSD, see Answer to Interrogatory No. 9. INTERROGATORY NO. 12: With respect to II.E. of the proposed plan, please identify any category of certified personnel where the LRSD does not have the right to assign personnel for the good of the system and the basis of the limitation. ANSWER: See Articles XV through XVIII of the PN Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit D, and the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act. r:lhomellcndlcyUrld'da-jooh.,a 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I INTERROGATORY NO. 13: With respect to II.H. of the proposed plan, please describe in detail any specific initiative(s) in the LRSD at present, whether involving particular personnel, or standards, designed to guard against black students' receiving discipline for conduct for which white students are not disciplined, black students' receiving discipline for trivial matters, and/or black students' receiving more severe discipline than white students for similar conduct. ANSWER: LRSD expects all of its students, regardless of race or socioeconomic background, to comply with the Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. If a student fails to comply, the student will be disciplined as provided in the Handbook. Discipline information including the race of the student, the race of the administrator, the nature of the offense and the sanction imposed is compiled by the schools and maintained by LRSD. LRSD's Associate Superintendent for Student Discipline reviews this information in an attempt to identify possible racial discrimination. INTERROGATORY NO. 14: With respect to II.I. of the proposed plan, please define, with specificity, the word \"qualified,\" as it applies to each of the three areas discussed in the obligation, namely \"extracurricular activities\", \"advanced placement courses\", and \"gifted and talented\" programs. ANSWER: The phrase \"qualified African-American students\" means African-American students who satisfy the eligibility criteria for an activity or program. For many activities and (:\\hoorcll'endlcyll..dldoo-jolh.ra 7 programs, there are eligibility criteria other than student interest. INTERROGATORY NO. 15: With respect to II.J. of the proposed plan, does LRSD agree that as written the system would be in compliance with this provision if the system continued to implement any two programs with its federal Title I monies to improve the academic achievement of African-American students. If not, lease (sic) explain the basis for the disagreement. ANSWER: No. LRSD must also implement the programs, policies and/or procedures set forth in Section V of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 16: With respect to II.L. of the proposed plan, please define the terms \"equitable allocation,\" \"technological resources,\" and \"educational resources.\" Also, please identify any data source allowing a determination of whether these resources are equitably allocated to LRSD schools at present. ANSWER: The phrase \"equitable allocation\" means to allocate based on need and without bias or favoritism. The term \"technological resources\" means up-to-date computer and information technology. The term \"educational resources'' includes teachers, teacher aides, equipment and supplies. With regard to a data source for determing whether these resources are currently equitably allocated, see the technology work team report, the individual school profiles and the LRSD budget. INTERROGATORY NO. 17: With respect to II.M. of the proposed plan, please define the term \"equitable\" and identify the matters encompassed in the terms \"maintenance and repair.\" In addition, /:lhomo,1/crdlcylltod'doo-jch.,.. 8 please identify any source of data available to ascertain compliance with this obligation on a school-by-school basis. ANSWER: The term \"equitable\" means based on need and without bias or favoritism. The terms \"maintenance and repair\" include the routine upkeep of the building and grounds and the repair or replacement of elements of the building and grounds which are no longer functional. LRSD maintains records which would indicate maintenance requests submitted by schools, the priority assigned to those requests and when and if those requests were acted upon. INTERROGATORY NO. 18: With respect to II.N. of the proposed plan, please identify any specific initiatives currently undertaken in the LRSD to ascertain whether or not guidance or counseling services provided to African-American students involve steering to a restricted range of courses and/or postsecondary educational opportunities. ANSWER: LRSD recognizes that African-American students are underrepresented in upper-level courses and has implemented strategies to address that issue. Specifically with regard to guidance and counseling services, LRSD has requested a National Science Foundation grant to fund training modeled after TESA and EQUALS to assist counselors in motivating African-American students to take the courses necessary to later be successful in upper-level science and math courses. INTERROGATORY NO. 19: With respect to II.O. of the proposed plan, does LRSD maintain that this subparagraph adds anything to r:\"\"'-lfcndley~r,d\\deo-jcoh.ra 9 other obligations of the plan. If so, please describe with specificity what it adds. ANSWER: Yes. The obligations in Section II should be interpreted consistent with Paragraph 0. INTERROGATORY NO. 20: With respect to II. P. of the proposed plan, please set forth the number of persons the LRSD plans to assign on a full-time basis to compliance/monitoring activities and the categories of positions to be staffed. In addition, please describe any steps to insure that the make-up of the staff includes a substantial number of African-American persons and any role which LRSD is willing to give the representative of the Joshua Intervenors in the selection of this staff. ANSWER: These decisions have not yet been made. INTERROGATORY NO. 21: With respect to III. A. 1. of the proposed plan, please identify any document and any existing analysis stored in any other manner projecting school make-up by race if the steps described in this subparagraph are implemented. If any such data does not currently exist, please describe how such a projection could be done with data and resources available to the LRSD. ANSWER: LRSD is currently working with Edulog software to project school make-up under scenarios consistent with Section III of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 22: With respect to III.B. I . -5 of the proposed plan, please: (i) identify all written standards governing these transfers and (ii) describe any unwritten practices governing l:ll,anollcndlcy\\Jnd'du-jooh.,a 10 one or more of these transfers. (iii) In addition, please define the concepts of \"capacity limitations\" and \"reasonable requirement\" identifying any designations of schools capacities to be utilized. (iv) In addition, please explain the language \"a special need arising out of circumstances unique to a particular student\" by reference to the circumstances of youth receiving such transfers in 1997-98 and explain who does and who would decide that the requisite circumstances exist. (v) Lastly, please identify the numbers of students by race utilizing each category of such transfers in 1997-98. ANSWER: (i) No additional standards have been developed beyond what is contain in the Revised Plan. (ii) None. (iii) A school's capacity is a function of the physical plant and the educational programs being implemented at a school . At this time, LRSD is using the school capacity numbers attached hereto as Exhibit E. The \"reasonable requirements\" described in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of Section III.B. relate to procedural requirements which may be imposed by LRSD to ensure that student assignment occurs in a timely and efficient manner. (iv) Special circumstances transfers as described by the Revised Plan are currently handled through an appeals committee composed of five members with individual members selected by the LRSD Board of Directors, the Biracial Committee, the PTA Council r:lhomo\\fendlcyUnod'dc.-jooh.,a 11 and the Little Rock CTA. The committee reviews requests for transfers based on geographic isolation, racial isolation, medical hardship and other extenuating circumstances. This committee was established by the Tri-District plan and has been continued by LRSD under its current plan. (v) Records concerning transfers will be made available upon request at a time and date mutually agreed to by counsel. INTERROGATORY NO. 23: With respect to III. E. of the proposed plan, please identify any potential sites for the school in west Little Rock, including any sites set forth in any study. In addition, please state whether the LRSD envisions the court's approving the site prior to its final approval. ANSWER: No potential site has been identified. Although LRSD anticipates keeping both the court and the parties informed about the site selection process, the site would not have to be approved by the court except as provided in Section IX.B. of the Revised Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 24: With respect to IV.E. of the proposed plan, please describe any existing agreements, standards, and practices relating to cooperative efforts of the LRSD and PCSSD. ANSWER: See Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. INTERROGATORY NO. 25: With respect to V.B. and C. of the proposed plan, please (i) identify the author or authors of the provisions, committees and entities, designating the provision or provisions associated with each such author; ( ii) identify any document(s) providing further explanation of any provision(s) of f:lhomo\\fcndlcyllrod\\doo-jooh.,_ 12 the proposal; (iii) regarding parts B.l.a., B.2.a., and B.3.a., please identify any standards describing the level of competency envisioned in each instance and how it would be assessed; is developing the standards and the general timelines for that effort; and (iv) regarding these three parts of the plan, please state whether LRSD plans to have students satisfy a test requirement prior to moving to the next grade; if the matter is not decided, but such a requirement remains an option, please indicate. ANSWER: See curriculum work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 26: With respect to V.C.4. of the proposed plan, what is the reason for evaluating Algebra I placement procedures and what would be done with the evaluation results. ANSWER: See curriculum work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 27: With respect to V.D. of the proposed plan, please identify any standards for use of the \"additional funding.\" If none currently exist, how would standards be developed and in what time period. Lastly, what is the position of the LRSD regarding the use of some funds to pay area college students to tutor in these schools, during and outside the regular school day, on a one-to-one basis. ANSWER: See incentive school work team report and incentive school individual school plans. LRSD has not taken a position on the use of some funds to pay area college students to tutor in the incentive schools. INTERROGATORY NO. 28 : With respect to V.F. of the proposed plan, please identify any standards for this effort and provide a (:lhonwlfcrdlcyUtwd'-\"jcoh.- 13 definition of the language \"parental and community relations linkage system.\" ANSWER: See community links work team report. INTERROGATORY NO. 29: With respect to V.I. of the proposed plan, please explain why the title and the first paragraph apply to teachers and the next two paragraphs apply to certified personnel. As to V.B., what person or persons would decide when the desegregative impact would be outweighed. ANSWER: All of Section VI applies to certified personnel. The superintendent or his designee would decide when the desegregative impact would be outweighed by the educational benefit from allowing a teacher to remain in his or her present assignment or to transfer to another assignment. INTERROGATORY NO. 3 0: With respect to Part VII. of the proposed plan, please identify all documents alluded to in this part, including but not limited to \"compliance standards and procedures\", and/or further explanatory of the meaning of this part. ANSWER: The compliance standards and procedures have not yet been developed. Section VII is based on the requirements for an effective corporate integrity program under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines 8Al.2. INTERROGATORY NO. 31: What if any impact would the court's approval of the proposed plan, or a modified version, have on the life of the agreement which LRSD maintains was made regarding fee payments to counsel for the Joshua Intervenors after the payment of (:lhomo\\lcrdlcyllnd'da,-jo,11.,_ 14 the amount described in the Settlement Agreement. If the LRSD view is that the agreement would continue in force, please set forth the terms of the agreement on which LRSD relies and explain how the agreement could continue in view of the terms of the agreement asserted by the LRSD. ANSWER: The fee agreement was part of the settlement agreement which is not being modified by the Revised Plan. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Please provide a copy of each document which you have identified in responding to interrogatories numbered 2 through 30. RESPONSE: LRSD will make the documents identified herein available for inspection upon request at a time and date mutually agreed to by counsel. INTERROGATORY NO. 32: Do you consider these interrogatories and req~est for documents as continuing and agree to supplement your answers as required by the Court's order of October 23, 1997? ANSWER: LRSD will comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the orders of the district court. r:\\homolfc..dlcy\\lr,d\\dao-_jool,.ra 15 VERIFICATION STATE OF ARKANSAS) ) ss. COUNTY OF PULASKI) I, Dr. Leslie V. Carnine, state under oath that I am the Superintendent of the Little Rock School District, that the foregoing answers have been prepared from information gathered from personnel and records of the District, that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I am authorized to execute this document on behalf of the District. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BY:~ DR. LESIEV.CARNINE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, a notary public, on this day of December, 1997. r:lhomolfcndl,:yllnodldco-jooh.,.. Christopher J. Heller John C. Fendley, Jr. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3493 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Little Rock School District BY: 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on this 3rd day of December, 1997. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 ~ittle Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 f:'llornolfcndlcyUl'ICl'da-jooll.,.. 17 Elementary Teachers - 1993 , 17 i . 4 t---15--- --25.o ---- -- -1L2% - 18.2% -18.0% 3 Total ---  246 r 434  ...  i .f i IC PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT A Elementary Teachers - 1994 --- -- 18 - --- -- --- . 17 191)% -L5.3% . '---- --  61 . 5 % - -27. 2% - ' 0 Elementary Teachers - 1995 -,_,-----+--.,.,----+---- --------- ------ -- . 0 . 0 Elementary Teachers - 1996 I I ;- -r-- -- 56.3% -- ....... 22. I%- 2 12 4 Elementary Teachers - 1997 3 - -  9 r6   60. o -1 24.2 - 12 : \\  -- 2r- - 46.2% - --1 OA% - Elementary Teachers - 1998 i ! 3 ........... - 51.3% - .. 15.5% -- Secondary Teachers -1993 ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% CENTRAL 21 49 30.0% CLOVERDALE 2 30 6.3% DUNBAR 8 23 25.8% FAIR 7 29 19.4% FOREST HEIGHTS 9 20 31.0% HALL 9 35 20.5% HENDERSON 9 26 25.7% MABELVALE 3 20 13.0% MANNM/S 13 22 37.1% MCCLELLAN 12 24 33.3% PARK.VIEW 9 28 24.3% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 28 12.5% SOUTHWEST 15 15 50.0% 93 Total 125 351 26.3% Secondary Teachers - 1994 ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% CENTRAL 25 48 34.2% CLOVERDALE 5 30 14.3% DUNBAR 8 25 24.2% FAIR 8 28 22.2% FOREST HEIGHTS 9 19 32.1% HALL 10 34 22.7% HENDERSON 8 30 21.1% MABELVALE 6 21 22.2% MANNM/S 13 25 34.2% MCCLELLAN 12 27 30.8% PARKVIEW 11 28 28.2% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 29 12.1% SOUTHWEST 15 15 50.0% 94 Total 138 361 27.6% 40.4% 3.7% -20.0% -.5% -6.8% 4.8% -5.8% -.5% -13.2% 10.9% 7.1% -1.9% -13.8% 23.7% er;- -~=~ ... ;J~mlg,\u0026;? ',~zj~g,~~ 39.0% 6.6% -13.4% -3.4% -5.4% 4.5% -4.9% -6.6% -5.4% 6.6% 3.1% .5% -15.5% 22.3% PLAINTIFF'S 1 EXHIBIT s :5 J Secondary Teachers - 1995 Scn\"o' ~~- '~-~ . - ,._, . ::;;:. , . ..  - .. ---: -  ...,  - ~~ 1:eme..\" r:i-,i ..~... ~ ~ n,_i.c,..a, .i ,,f~ :-.-:..:.P.. ~e,rc\" ent,a_.g e , ' . . -  , ~- , . . . ~.  .-~-- -.: -~:~1:-.-- : .r.:. :':\"'=:\" -.::-  .. :- ! .. -  . ~  . ;- -}~- ;..,,f.,.   _; ,  ~ capj ~ ;~~~~~c.AA,:;::,.:~ ~:...: Y.anance ;. ALTLRN 4 2 66.7% 36.0% CENTRAL 24 42 36.4% 5.7% CLOVERDALE 5 24 17.2% -13.4% DUNBAR 10 20 33.3% 2.6% FAIR 13 23 36.1% 5.4% FOREST HEIGHTS 12 19 38.7% 8.0% HALL 10 34 22.7% -8.0% HENDERSON 10 26 27.8% -2.9% MABELVALE 5 21 19.2% -11.5% MANNM/S 10 26 27.8% -2.9% MCCLELLAN 12 24 33.3% 2.6% PARK.VIEW 10 28 26.3% -4.4% PULASKI HEIGHTS 7 29 19.4% -11.2% SOUIBWEST 15 14 51.7% 21.0% 95 Total 147 332 30.7% Secondary Teachers - 1996 s~il~l~l~fillE1~ ~JH~tt~~,r.:i ~~~pt~~!~: ALT LRN ' 4 2 66.7% 33.1% CENTRAL 23 41 35.9% 2.4% CLOVERDALE 11 20 35.5% 2.0% DUNBAR 15 18 45.5% 11.9% FAIR 15 25 37.5% 4.0% FOREST HEIGHTS 12 20 37.5% 4.0% HALL 10 36 21.7% -11.8% HENDERSON 19 20 48.7% 15.2% MABELVALE 5 22 18.5% -15.0% MANNM/S 12 25 32.4% -1.1% MCCLELLAN 10 32 23.8% -9.7% PARK.VIEW 12 29 29.3% -4.3% PULASKI HEIGHTS 6 32 15.8% -17.7% SOUTHWEST 15 13 53.6% 20.0% 96 Total 169 335 33 .5% Secondary Teachers - 1997  ~=ifl ~\"I- m11me'rc'efiliifff ' ..- .. ~Rercenta e, . CENTRAL 24 44 35.3% .4% CLOVERDALE 12 19 38.7% 3.8% DUNBAR 14 21 40.0% 5.1% FAIR 14 20 41.2% 6.3% FOREST HEIGHTS 11 18 37.9% 3.1% HALL 11 33 25.0% -9.9% HEDERSON 17 19 47.2% 12.4% MABELVALE 5 20 20.0% -14.9% MANNM/S 12 25 32.4% -2.4% MCCLELLAN 13 30 30.2% -4.6% PARK.VIEW 14 28 33.3% -1.5% PULASKI HEIGHTS 4 35 10.3% -24.6% SOUTHWEST 19 10 65.5% 30.6% 97 Total 174 325 34.9% Secondary Teachers - 1998 . :.:f.i~:~~~~17:(f-;~.;BpiJ .~ --~~:n . caira ' ~- ' ~caw an\"'---.; ~ercefftre.~canl ~ :r.ercen~ge.:. ' Sclioolf:f:~,:t~\".. .~ _,; , aniei ~~-~ ~ :.,.-.:~} ~:~~,~J.;: ~- ; --:~~4t.lm.;i -~-~~~- i~~~.~ ;:i;. ~3:~e;;, ALTLRN ' 2 5 28.6% -7.4% CENTRAL 27 48 36:0% .0% CLOVERDALE 13 19 40.6% 4.6% DUNBAR 17 22 43 .6% 7.6% FAIR 11 23 32.4% -3 .6% FOREST HEIGHTS 14 17 45 .2% 9.2% HALL 11 33 25.0% -11.0% HENDERSON 16 19 45 .7% 9.7% MABELVALE 4 21 16.0% -20.0% MANN MIS 15 23 39.5% 3.5% MCCLELLAN 14 29 32.6% -3.4% PARK.VIEW 16 29 35.6% -.4% PULASKI HEIGHTS 6 31 16.2% -19.8% SOUTHWEST 19 10 65.5% 29.5% 98 Total 185 329 36.0% Central Office Administrators - 1993 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 4 2 Departmental Directors 5 12 93 Total 9 15 Central Office Administrators - 1994 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 3 2 Departmental Directors 5 13 94 Total 9 IS Central Office Administrators - 1995 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 3 3 Departmental Directors 6 14 95 Total 10 17 Central Office Administrators - 1996 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 2 3 Departm,ental Directors 5 13 96 Total 8 16 Central Office Administrators - 1997 Superintendent 0 Assistant Superintendent 2 2 Departmental Directors 4 12 97 Total 6 IS 0.0% 66.7% 29.4% 37.5% 100.0% 60.0% 27.8% 37.5% 100.0% 50.0% 30.0% 37.0% 100.0% 40.0% 27.8% 33.3% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 28.6% ~ PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT c,., Central Office Administrators - 1998 Superintendent 0 2 0.0% Assistant Superintendent 2 2 50.0% Departmental Directors 4 10 28.6% 98 Total 6 14 30.0% Principals and Assistant Prlnlclpals -1993 Principals and Assistant Prlnlclpals - 1994 s 8 18 16 52.9% S2 47 S2.So/o Principals and Assistant Priniclpals - 1995 Principals and Assistant Prinlclpals - 1996 r--- -- - ; - :~ . ~:.::-,..1- 11: -11 -~\\:::;:t~: ~~ l~-;''._~::'.i~~i~~;:f.:i!: l L-.ac ~ :-~--~t~(_I~ . - - ~r ~'l.,.t.~~l:~:..!! Elementarv Princioals 17 18 48.6% Elementary Assistant Principals II s 68.8% Secondary Principals 8 6 57.1 o/o Secondary Assistant Principals 20 13 60.6% 96 Total S6 42 53.1 o/o Principals and Assistant Prinicipals - 1997 Secondary Ass 20 16 55.6% 97 Total 57 44 56.4% Principals and Assistant Priniclpals - 1998 11 5 s 9 5 64.3% s 20 16 55 .6% - 98 Total S6 4S 55.4% ARTICLE XV TEACHING ASSIGNMENTS A. The procedure outlined below shall be followed in making teaching assignments: 1. Teaching assignments shall be based upon training, experience, competence, seniority, tenure, and such other factors as would indicate success in the position to be filled. 2. To assure that students are taught by teachers working within their areas of competence, teachers shall not be assigned, except temporarily and for good cause, outside the scope of their teaching certificates of their major or minor field of study. Teachers assigned outside their major or minor fields shall not be penalized on the salary schedule in any way. When requested, the Director of Personnel will make available to the Association a list of teachers assigned outside their major or minor fields.  3. All teaching assignments will be made by the principal or his/her superiors after the following steps are taken: a. Each year all teachers will submit in writing their personal preference for grade level, group and subject assignments, and such preference shall be a factor in making assignments. b. Department Coordinators will be consulted before assignments are made in their departments. 4. Secondary teachers shall not be required to teach more than two (2) subject matter areas with no more than two (2) preparations involved. Basic, regular, and enriched classes shall be considered separate preparations. Exceptions will only be made when it would otherwise be impossible to enroll all students who have registered for a required course. Teachers assigned more than two (2) preparations will be so notified as soon as possible and in no case later than three (3) weeks before the teach ing assignment is to commence. No teacher shall be assigned more than three (3) preparations under any circumstances. 5. Schedules of teachers who are assigned to more than one (I) school shall be arranged so that such teachers shall not be required to engage in an unreasonable amount of interschool travel. 6. The principal shall or should consult with the Building Coordinating Committee in regard to the tentative master schedule for the following year, and all teachers will be given an opportunity to discuss their tentative assignments with the principal if they so request. B. The following procedure shall be used for notifying teachers of their assignments: 1. Returning teachers shall be given written notice of their tentative grade levei, grouping, subject area assignments, building assignments, and room assignments by the end of the current school year. Newly elected teachers shall be given such notic "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1173","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Cloverdale Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","David O. Dodd Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Dunbar Magnet Middle School (Little Rock, Ark.)","J. A. Fair High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fair Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1173"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["97 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nCloverdale Junior High, Dodd Elementary, Dunbar Magnet Junior High, Fair High, Fair Park Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCLOVERDALE JR.HIGH  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR REMDL/COMP READING RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 5 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 10 16 7 22 0 0 18.18 29.09 12.73 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 2 32 5 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 55 00 55 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 40.63 100.00 50.00 00 25.00 100.00 50.00 00 100.00 47.27 47.27 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 10 11 0 4 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 40.00 44.00 00 16.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 75.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 84.00 84.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 20 27 7 26 25.00 33.75 8.75 32.50 0 .00 0 .oo 80 80 % BLACK 58.75 58.75 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 97 69 12 1 5 6 190 87.4% 08 110 85 6 5 1 8 215 90.7% 09 101 91 4 8 7 7 218 88.1% Total 308 245 22 14 13 21 623 88.8% 49.4% 39.3% 3.5% 2.2% 2 .1% 3.4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l - CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ABLES F. 1 4 4 1 9 88.9% ALLEN c. 1 45 43 1 1 4 94 93.6% ANDRESS W. 1 53 42 4 4 1 4 108 88.0% BEEBE S. 1 51 40 2 4 1 4 102 89.2% BENNETT A. 1 53 34 7 1 3 2 100 87.0% BENSON J. 1 49 29 3 1 2 84 92.9% GATELY L. 1 55 27 2 1 4 89 92 .1% BOSTIC K. 1 51 42 2 1 3 99 93.9% BURNETTE D. 1 50 47 2 3 4 4 110 88.2% CHAMBERS A. 1 60 12 6 3 1 82 87.8% CRISWELL D. 1 14 5 2 21 90.5% CROSSNO III J. 1 24 31 4 2 1 62 88.7% CROWDER c. 1 1 1 2 100. 0% DAVIS M. 1 51 42 2 4 3 102 91. 2% DOSS G. 1 19 4 3 1 27 85.2% EARNEST A. 1 44 37 4 2 4 91 89.0% LRSD SECONDARY scHooL els ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l ce CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDDINGTON K. 1 53 46 3 1 1 4 108 91. 7% ENOCH L. 1 2 3 5 100.0% GULLETT-SHELN T. 1 46 26 6 3 2 83 86.7% HAMILTON O. 1 47 35 4 2 4 92 89 .1% HARPER G. 1 51 43 3 5 3 4 109 86.2% HARRIS A. 1 31 64 3 1 5 104 91.3% HARRIS s. 1 1 1 100.0% HEARN A. 1 46 37 3 4 4 94 88.3% HERVEY s. 1 1 6 7 100.0% HOOPER B. 1 52 41 1 3 2 5 104 89.4% HUNTS. 1 54 39 4 1 2 4 104 89.4% JEFFERS M. 1 44 48 1 3 4 3 103 89.3% JONES D. 1 51 55 2 4 5 2 119 89.1% JONES K. 1 so 36 7 1 3 2 99 86.9% JONES x. 1 45 49 3 5 4 4 110 85.5% KINSEY T. 1 32 23 1 2 58 94.8% LRSD - CLOVERDALE SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29 . Schoo1: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black KLAIS N. 1 30 26 2 1 1 4 64 87.5% LABATT T. 1 34 33 4 3 2 76 88.2% LAMB C. 1 71 49 3 3 5 4 135 88.9% LEINBACH s. 1 57 44 2 1 1 4 109 92.7% MCFADDEN c. 1 47 47 5 1 2 4 106 88.7% MEDLOCK J. 1 12 5 2 19 89.5% NESMITH E. 1 48 36 2 2 2 90 93.3% NORMAN C. 1 24 4 1 1 1 31 90.3% PATTERSON D. 1 1 1 100.0% PENNINGTON J. 1 48 42 1 3 4 3 101 89 .1% POORE' P. 1 50 42 5 1 2 4 104 88.5% RALEY B. 1 18 3 1 3 25 84.0% RHODES B. 1 44 55 2 2 4 6 113 87.6% RUSH L. 1 48 48 3 4 3 4 110 87.3% SCOTTS. 1 21 24 2 3 2 2  54 83.3% SHUMATE K. 1 45 47 8 1 1 4 106 86.8% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: e CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te~m: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SLOAN D. 1 49 26 7 2 1 6 91 82.4% STARLING L. 1 57 41 4 4 4 1 111 88.3% STEPHENS L. 1 54 40 8 1 1 5 109 86.2% TAYLOR T. 1 35 11 1 47 97.9% VAN PELTS. 1 16 18 1 2 7 7 51 66. 7% WICKLIFFE A. 1 35 23 1 1 1 61 95.1% WILLIAMS B. 1 61 45 6 3 1 1 117 90.6% YOUNG K. 1 38 38 2 4 4 86 88.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 4 0 0 0 0 10 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 31 9 4 0 1 1 46 87.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 7 3 0 0 0 19 84.2% TOTALS 48 23 7 1 1 1 81 87.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 34 36 3 3 0 1 77 90.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 9 1 2 12 83.3% 08 8 1 1 1 11 81.8% 09 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 10 9 2 2 14 9 82.6% 08 13 7 1 1 2 16 8 83.3% 09 27 9 3 1 1 30 11 87.8% MATH 07 12 7 1 2 14 8 86.4% 08 14 7 1 1 1 15 9 87.5% 09 38 15 3 1 2 41 18 89.8% HISTORY /SOC STUDIES 07 9 9 2 11 9 90.0% 08 26 7 1 1 1 28 8 91.7% 09 18 5 4 1 1 22 7 79.3% SCIENCE 07 22 6 1 1 1 24 7 90.3% 08 19 10 1 2 20 12 90.6% 09 25 9 3 1 1 28 11 87.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 .0% Math 1 1 2 4 50.0% Science 2 3 1 6 83.3% Social Studies 1 4 1 6 16.7% Foreign Language 1 1 2 .0% TOTAL 4 4 6 9 23 34.8% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 42 1 43 97.7% 2 1 3 66. 7% Drill Team 18 18 100. 0% 1 1 100.0% Pride Group 20 3 23 87.0% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 6 1 1 8 75.0% 1 1 .0% Choir 17 34 2 2 55 92.7% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 11 1 12 91. 7% 2 2 .0% Volleyball 17 17 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Monitors .0% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% Beta .0% 2 2 100.0% FBLA 21 36 4 1 3 65 87.7% 2 1 3 66.7% FHA 4 10 2 2 18 77.8% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 15 20 1 2 38 92.1% 1 1 .0% Poetry Club .0% .0% Peer-Facilitator 10 10 2 3 2 2 29 69.0% 1 2 3 100.0% Year Book 10 20 1 1 32 93.8% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Newspaper 10 6 16 100.0% 1 1 .0% Girls Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Boys Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Prin.Council 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% SECME 12 18 3 33 90.9% 1 1 2 50.0% NJHS 10 20 2 32 93.8% 1 2 3 .0% BAND 35 12 47 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Golf .0% .0% Soccer .0% .0% Track(Boys) .0% .0% Track(girls) .0% .0% Teach/Tomorrow .0% .0% TOTAL 207 240 11 23 3 8 492 90.9% 11 10 5 11 37 56.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A Honor Roll 7- 17 23 4 8 2 54 74.1% A/B Honor Ro 7- 58 93 11 16 4 7 189 79.9% C/F StofWk 7- .0% Cadet F/Fli 7 .0% Eagle F/Fli 7 .0% TOTAL 75 116 15 24 6 7 243 78.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Biracial Committ P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% 1 100.0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 4 1 WM WF OM 2 1 OF Total 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS .0% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 10 13 8 19 50 46.0% .0% Stud.Recruit.Com 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Windows .0% .0% TOTAL 10 15 8 20 53 47.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 13 TESA 4 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS 13 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 TOTAL 37 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 21 Behavior Mgmt 15 Coop Discipline 13 TOTAL 64 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Student Asst Prg 19 New Futures Ins. 16 Curriculum/L.A. 8 Curriculum/Math 5 Curr/SocialStud. 4 Curr. Science 7 Voe. Ed. Inserv 5 G/T Inserv. 11 Special Ed. Ins 5 Health Ins. 7 Prag Budg.Docum 1 Data Process Ins 2 TOTAL 90 PAGE 1 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 2 1 1 4 2 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 3 0 4 0 1 12 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 33.33 25.00 00 33.33 00 8.33 12 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 58.33 58.33 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 9 2 18 14.29 25.71 5.71 51.43 0 .oo 1 2.86 TOTAL 35 35 % BLACK 40.00 40.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 5 9 7 2 1 0 24 58.3% SP 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 70.0% 01 14 4 11 4 2 0 35 51.4% 02 14 16 4 5 0 1 40 75.0% 03 12 5 2 3 0 0 22 77.3% 04 10 11 4 7 1 1 34 61.8% 05 13 14 5 10 0 0 42 64.3% 06 6 7 2 4 0 0 19 68.4% Total 81 66 38 35 4 2 226 65.0% 35.8% 29.2% 16.8% 15.5% 1.8% .9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BLUE s. 1 4 4 3 1 1 13 61.5% K HARE v. 1 1 5 4 1 11 54.5% 01 MEEKS J. 1 6 3 6 2 1 18 50.0% 01 MITCHELL v. 1 8 1 5 2 1 17 52.9% 01 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 CHAMBERS S. 1 7 9 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 TAYLOR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RAINES A. 1 7 7 2 3 19 73. 7% 02 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 TAYLOR L. 1 12 5 2 3 22 77.3% 04 DILDAY J. 1 6 6 2 2 1 17 70.6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 FLEMING D. 1 4 5 2 5 1 17 52.9% 05 FRAWLEY E. 1 8 7 1 6 22 68.2% 05 GOLDMON Y. 1 5 7 4 4 20 60.0% 05 TAYLOR M. 1 3 3 100.0% 06 TAYLOR M. 1 2 2 .0% 06 RIDDLE B. 1 6 7 2 4 19 68.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded l 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 3 0 0 11 63.6% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 10 1 2 4 0 0 17 64. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 7 2 7 0 0 22 59 .1% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 2 50.0% 01 3 1 4 75.0% 04 1 1 2 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Beta Club .0% .0% Student Council .0% .0% Hall Monitors 5 4 1 4 1 15 60.0% .0% Fire Marshal ls 2 2 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Safety Patrol 3 2 1 6 50.0% 2 2 3 7 28.6% Basketball 15 3 18 83.3% 14 8 22 63.6% Cheerleaders 15 11 1 27 55.6% 15 7 22 68.2% Tiny Tumblers .0% .0% Peer Tutors 5 8 1 6 20 65.0% 8 9 1 2 20 85.0% Peer Helpers 4 6 3 2 15 66.7% .0% Conflict Manager .0% 3 2 2 4 11 45.5% Ambassadors 9 3 4 8 24 50.0% .0% Announcements 6 8 2 4 20 70.0% 14 11 9 2 36 69.4% Just Say No .0% .0% Flag Monitors 6 2 1 1 10 80.0% 5 1 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 55 48 18 39 1 2 163 63.2% 61 24 30 11 126 67.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's 1- 11 7 13 11 1 1 44 40.9% 3.0 1- 22 26 7 14 1 70 68.6% Citizenship K- 28 17 17 22 2 2 88 51.1% Perfect Att. K- 25 19 8 9 1 62 71.0% Acad. Hall K- .0% TOTAL 86 69 45 56 3 5 264 58.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 1 WM WF 1 2 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 4 1 Black 50.0% 25.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 50.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE P.S.T. Committee Sch. Impv. /COE Discipline Comm. BM 1 1 BF 1 2 WM WF 1 3 4 3 OM OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 3 4 3 OM 2 OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Hos pi tali ty 3 3 .0% 1 2 3 33.3% BCC Committee 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Recruitment 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 1 4 25.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Guidance Comm. TOTAL BM 1 3 BF 9 WM WF 2 4 25 OM OF Total % 5 39 Black 20.0% 30.8% BM 1 5 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 8 1 4 25 1 5 40 Black 20.0% 32.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: School Climate Human Relations TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET-Review K-6 12 21 Integrated Curr. 21 21 1 Autism Workshop 3 1 Math Workshop 21 3 1 TOTAL 54 48 1 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Individual Inst. 7 1 Reading Recovery 1 1 1 K-4 Training 5 2 Shurley Method 15 2 1 1 Multi.Intelligen 15 K-Spec.Needs 2 Reading/Economic 3 Early Literacy 6 1 Social Studies 14 Behavior Mgt. 18 18 6 6 TOTAL 53 55 8 10 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Partners in Educ 2 1 Open Ct. Phonics 21 20 1 TOTAL 23 21 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 9 8 6 15 0 1 39 43.59 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.67 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 13 15 11 21 0 1 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 21.31 24.59 18. 03 34.43 00 1. 64 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 12 0 5 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 22.73 54.55 00 22.73 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 100.00 83.33 100.00 00 00 00 00 100.00 100. 00 77.27 77.27 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M  F M F M F 18 27 11 26 21.69 32.53 13.25 31.33 0 .oo 1 1.20 TOTAL 83 83 % BLACK 54.22 54.22 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 78 86 49 41 9 9 272 60.3% 08 72 82 50 42 6 8 260 59.2% 09 70 59 49 52 8 7 245 52. 7% Total 220 227 148 135 23 24 777 57.5% 28.3% 29.2% 19.0% 17.4% 3.0% 3 .1% LRSD. oeDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Texm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADKINS c. 1 30 37 24 20 4 4 119 56.3% AXE. 1 25 35 27 23 4 3 117 51.3% JOHNSON K. 1 9 11 11 9 2 6 48 41. 7% BANKHEAD c. 1 39 54 21 14 3 4 135 68.9% BELL L. 1 22 31 25 14 3 3 98 54 .1% BLACKWELL w. 1 20 28 31 28 2 4 113 42.5% BROWN L. 1 37 17 8 8 5 75 72. 0% BROWN R. 1 55 53 18 15 4 4 149 72. 5% BURGESS R. 1 69 36 4 8 1 2 120 87.5% CARL D. 1 40 46 17 24 7 3 137 62.8% CARR D. 1 30 40 18 15 5 4 112 62.5% CARTER M. 1 23 25 18 20 5 2 93 51.6% POSITION v. 1 2 2 4 .0% CLAYBORN N. 1 41 46 26 22 2 4 141 61. 7% ROBINSON B. 1 47 49 12 4 1 4 117 82.1% DEAN O. 1 48 13 35 6 7 1 110 55.5% LRSD ce DUNBAR INT. L SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNN R. 1 9 9 1 1 2 1 23 78.3% FLYNN T. 1 29 40 22 8 3 3 105 65.7% FORNEROD. 1 17 24 16 11 1 4 73 56.2% GAINES s. 1 38 35 27 30 6 3 139 52.5% GARNER G. 1 28 30 18 20 3 2 101 57.4% HARTL. 1 33 28 29 25 2 117 52 .1% HENDERSON E. 1 32 25 33 30 4 5 129 44.2% HOEY M. 1 24 36 26 38 5 2 131 45.8% JACKSON G. 1 29 51 4 26 1 7 118 67.8% JONES F. 1 26 29 31 31 2 3 122 45 .1% JONES T. 1 49 50 15 8 2 3 127 78.0% LOGAN A. 1 40 27 34 37 4 4 146 45.9% MCDONALD T. 1 2 2 4 3 1 12 33.3% MCLEROY C. 1 45 37 8 3 3 5 101 81. 2% DAVIS B. 1 24 4 3 31 90.3% MUNDY s. 1 44 24 11 3 4 6 92 73.9% LRSD . ceDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MURRAY L. 1 7 18 44 39 5 5 118 21.2% NEWTON K. 1 32 38 13 12 3 3 101 69.3% OLDS A. 1 28 27 22 12 3 3 95 57.9% OSHIRO N. 1 39 47 28 20 2 136 63.2% PEACE P. 1 21 31 16 23 2 93 55.9% RICHARDSON w. 1 29 32 36 36 5 5 143 42. 7% RODGERS c. 1 55 43 19 10 5 1 133 73. 7% SANDERS s. 1 35 38 20 14 2 6 115 63.5% SHAVERS G. 1 31 9 3 43 93.0% SIMPSON R. 1 43 39 10 5 3 5 105 78 .1% SKOTKO F. 1 18 30 24 20 6 3 101 47.5% SLAYDEN M. 1 7 11 17 15 3 1 54 33.3% SMITH M. 1 33 35 7 3 3 2 83 81.9% SMITH s. 1 31 37 30 25 4 2 129 52. 7% STANLEY R. 1 11 20 21 21 4 4 81 38.3% TERRY P. 1 17 29 32 46 3 2 129 35. 7% LRSD ~DUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black UNDERWOOD J. 1 4 4 6 6 20 40.0% WARREN J. 1 24 24 31 29 8 4 120 40.0% WATSON c. 1 27 27 27 25 3 7 116 46.6% WATSON c. 1 28 25 18 25 3 4 103 51.5% WEBB B. 1 27 39 10 21 3 6 106 62.3% WESTERN J. 1 2 8 4 6 20 50.0% WISES. 1 25 31 33 40 3 2 134 41.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 4 1 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 20 6 5 1 0 0 32 81.3% Speech or Language Impaired 8 1 1 0 0 1 11 81.8% TOTALS 33 8 6 1 0 1 49 83. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 44 62 79 89 8 7 289 36.7% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 4 1 5 100. 0% 08 3 1 4 100.0% 09 4 1 1 1 7 71.4% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 13 3 1 14 3 94.1% 08 6 1 4 10 l 63.6% 09 11 10 3 2 14 12 80.8% MATH 07 5 l 1 6 1 85.7% 08 23 6 9 2 1 33 8 70.7% 09 18 5 2 3 1 21 8 79.3% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 7 5 2 9 5 85.7% 08 21 5 5 3 1 27 8 74.3% 09 14 6 1 1 15 7 90.9% SCIENCE 07 13 3 2 1 16 3 84.2% 08 9 2 2 1 12 2 78.6% 09 12 6 1 2 13 8 85.7% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 1 2 4 50.0% Math 1 2 3 .0% Science 1 1 1 3 66.7% Social Studies 1 3 4 25.0% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 3 2 1 8 14 35. 7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ESL CLUB 11 14 25 .0% 1 1 .0% CHEERLEADER 4 9 13 30.8% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% PEER MEDIATION 6 12 4 11 1 1 35 51. 4% 2 2 .0% VOLLEYBALL 18 9 27 66.7% 1 1 2 .0% LOVE 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 16 26 6 16 64 65.6% 1 1 2 50.0% FUTURE BOBCATS 5 5 5 5 20 50.0% 1 1 .0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 5 4 7 1 18 33.3% 1 1 .0% BETA CLUB 11 19 29 42 2 4 107 28.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 5 14 7 7 33 57.6% 1 1 .0% SPANISH CLUB 4 1 9 14 28.6% 1 1 .0% FOOTBALL 49 7 56 87.5% 3 3 100.0% GIRLS BASKETBALL 24 6 30 80.0% 1 1 2 100.0% GOLF TEAM .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black LATIN CLUB 2 3 10 6 1 2 24 20.8% 1 1 .0% GIRL'S TRACK .0% .0% BOY'S TRACK .0% .0% SOCCER .0% .0% TENNIS .0% .0% FHA 12 22 1 5 40 85.0% 1 1 100.0% ART CLUB 2 10 17 1 2 32 6.3% 1 1 .0% FRENCH CLUB 5 16 7 12 1 41 51.2% 1 1 .0% PROBLEM SOLVING 1 3 6 2 12 8.3% 1 1 .0% NEWSPAPER 4 4 5 6 1 20 40.0% 1 1 .0% RADIO CLUB 1 1 12 5 1 20 10.0% 1 1 2 50.0% YOUNG DEMOCRAT 2 8 20 1 31 6.5% 1 1 .0% ODYSSEY OF MIND 1 6 10 2 19 5.3% 3 3 .0% MOCK TRIAL 1 2 5 8 12.5% 1 1 .0% MATHLETES 1 8 6 2 3 20 5.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 5 14 5 10 1 35 54.3% 2 2 .0% BOYS BASKETBALL 12 2 1 15 80.0% 2 2 100.0% PRIN CABINET .0% 1 1 .0% OUTDOOR ED 8 5 7 3 1 2 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Y-TEENS 17 35 1 53 32 .1% 2 2 .0% FCA 11 10 3 1 1 26 80.8% 1 1 2 50.0% MEN OF DUNBAR 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 176 250 149 276 28 33 912 46.7% 9 6 7 25 47 31. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH HONOR/AWARD HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP REGION CHOIR TOTAL GRADE BM 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 9 BF WM WF OM 10/29/97 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE LIBRARY ADVISARY P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 2 2 WM WF 1 1 6 OM OF Total % 11 3 Black 36.4% 66.7% .0% BM 1 11 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 5 2 18 WM WF 1 4 4 4 37 OM 1 OF Total % 1 11 7 70 Black 45.5% 42.9% 41. 4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % TECHNOLOGY COMM SCHOOL IMPROV CO GT COMMITTEE 3 2 2 1 4 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 10 9 7 Black 40.0% 66.7% 42. 9% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 2 OF Total % Black 1 100.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total SCH RECRUITMENT PUPIL SERVICE MAGNET ADVISORY 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 5 12 5 % Black 40.0% 41. 7% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total 2 2 1 5 % Black 40.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 12 16 12 22 62 % Black 45.2% BM 12 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 28 7 46 4 OF Total 1 94 % Black 42.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 18 2 TESA 29 RACE RELATIONS 11 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 8 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 10 7 EDUC. EQUITY 112 6 TOTAL 188 22 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULT. DIVERSITY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 20 14 6 29 1 94 1 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. DOC. OF DISCIP. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: SEC SC I/MATH G/T WORKSHOP SECME LEARNING STYLES VIOLENCE PROVEN SAP FOR LANG ADVSRY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 10 3 44 26 5 3 86 5 PAGE 1  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 8 5 15 1 2 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 7 18 9 26 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 3 34 8 3 1 1 6 1 2 2 1 63 ll.ll 28.57 14.29 41.27 1.59 3.17 63 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 32.35 62.50 66.67 00 00 16.67 00 50.00 100.00 100.00 39.68 39.68 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 11 12 0 8 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 35.48 38.71 00 25.81 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 7 1 1 3 1 3 6 31 00 31 % BLACK 100.00 62.50 100.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 74.19 74.19 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 18 30 9 34 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.15 31.91 9.57 36.17 1.06 2 .13 94 94 % BLACK 51.06 51.06 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% SP 13 6 4 4 0 0 27 70.4% 10 139 93 29 24 0 2 287 80.8% 11 86 99 13 22 4 0 224 82.6% 12 81 102 16 25 1 1 226 81.0% Total 319 300 62 75 5 3 764 81.0% 41.8% 39.3% 8.1% 9.8% .7% .4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL el s ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: '4t FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black PHILLIPS M. 1 2 2 100.0% ANDERSON s. 1 53 35 8 11 1 1 109 80.7% ARMSTRONG J. 1 44 20 6 3 73 87.7% BEYAH R. 1 25 28 5 7 1 66 80.3% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% BOSTIC M. 1 22 37 4 8 3 74 79.7% BOURLAND M. 1 55 46 7 8 1 1 118 85.6% BRAGG A. 1 42 34 9 5 1 2 93 81. 7% BROADNAX w. 1 19 8 27 100. 0% CALLAWAY E. 1 46 48 2 6 1 103 91. 3% POSITION V. 1 3 3 100.0% CLEVELAND K. 1 60 33 11 5 1 110 84.5% BRAGG A. 1 45 38 5 6 1 95 87.4% COOKUS J. 1 43 41 6 7 2 99 84.8% PHILLIPS C. 1 13 7 3 4 27 74.1% DELAMAR C. 1 1 1 1 3 66.7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: lee FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNKLIN S. 1 48 25 9 12 94 77. 7% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% EARLEYWINE S. 1 33 37 6 11 3 90 77.8% ENDERLIN E. 1 36 25 7 4 1 73 83.6% ESKOLA G. 1 38 41 6 8 93 84.9% FELDMAN N. 1 46 58 7 8 119 87.4% GLASSCO B. 1 22 3 2 2 29 86.2% GRAY V. 1 31 32 7 6 1 77 81.8% GRUMMER w. 1 20 55 7 26 4 112 67.0% HALL L. 1 54 55 6 9 1 125 87.2% HARRIS L. 1 48 22 9 3 1 83 84.3% HARTNESS P. 1 20 10 5 35 85.7% HASTINGS M. 1 52 38 6 9 1 106 84.9% HEAVIN C. 1 20 37 1 10 68 83.8% POSITION v. 1 3 2 5 100.0% HOBBS P. 1 14 27 11 21 73 56.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HULLUM B. 1 49 33 6 6 1 95 86.3% JACKSONS. 1 41 36 6 9 92 83. 7% JACOBS A. 1 57 51 8 10 126 85. 7% JAMELL s. 1 11 7 4 4 26 69.2% JAMES M. 1 31 37 4 8 1 81 84.0% JENNINGS c. 1 17 32 8 15 72 68.1% JOHNSON J. 1 32 22 10 8 1 73 74.0% HARRISON T. 1 36 31 7 5 79 84.8% MACON s. 1 29 80 7 9 125 87.2% MAGEE B. 1 43 44 12 15 1 115 75.7% MAYS S. 1 41 44 4 2 91 93.4% MCAFEE R. 1 29 46 7 13 2 97 77.3% POSITION V. 1 3 5 8 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 100.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 .0% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION V. 1 12 3 15 80.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 .0% POSITION v. 1 9 9 100.0% POSITION V. 1 6 3 9 66. 7% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% MOREY D. 1 8 4 3 4 19 63.2% NAHLEN M. 1 27 29 4 10 70 80.0% PALMER R. 1 46 53 11 8 2 1 121 81.8% PICKERING J. 1 24 46 10 17 97 72.2% RAINS M. 1 42 35 10 7 1 95 81.1% RUTHERFORD P. 1 61 39 14 5 119 84.0% WALKER-RI CHAR L. 1 55 49 9 10 1 124 83.9% SCHMITT K. 1 36 32 9 15 92 73.9% POSITION V. 1 10 10 100.0% LRSD e FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION v. 1 7 22 4 9 42 69.0% STEELE M. 1 5 5 15 5 30 33.3% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% TAYLOR T. 1 21 20 1 1 43 95.3% THOMPSON P. 1 29 33 6 7 75 82.7% WAGE M. 1 54 54 8 10 1 1 128 84.4% WALKER s. 1 15 5 10 30 66.7% WILDER R. 1 30 37 10 11 4 92 72. 8% WILLIAMS M. 1 45 43 5 6 99 88.9% WILLIS L. 1 40 21 7 8 1 2 79 77.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 7 7 1 2 0 0 17 82.4% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 33.3% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Other Health Impaired 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 21 6 6 3 0 0 36 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 5 3 3 0 0 25 76.0% Visually Handicapped 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 47 21 15 11 0 0 94 72.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 65 14 13 1 0 123 77. 2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF 10 11 12 8 8 2 2 1 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total Count Black 13 76.9% 10 100.0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: FAIR HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 66 71 31 26 1 3 198 69.2% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 34 21 4 2 38 23 90.2% 11 12 5 4 1 1 17 6 73.9% 12 7 3 7 3 100.0% MATH 10 34 23 4 3 38 26 89 .1% 11 30 29 4 4 1 35 33 86.8% 12 15 10 1 15 11 96.2% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 28 11 3 2 31 13 88.6% 11 21 9 1 2 22 11 90.9% 12 3 1 1 4 1 80.0% SCIENCE 10 13 7 3 2 16 9 80.0% 11 9 5 2 9 7 87.5% 12 4 3 1 4 4 87.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL: STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM English 3 Math 2 Science 1 3 Social Studies 1 1 Foreign Language 1 TOTAL 2 2 8 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OF Total % Black 3 .0% 2 .0% 4 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 .0% 12 16.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Band 20 18 1 39 97.4% 1 1 100. 0% Baseball 5 21 26 19.2% 1 1 .0% Basketball, Boys 47 1 48 97.9% 2 2 100.0% Basketball, Girl 15 5 20 75 .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CCE 13 13 1 27 96.3% 1 1 100.0% Cheerleaders 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 100.0% Choir 8 37 1 7 53 84.9% 1 1 .0% Beta Club 4 22 3 11 40 65.0% 2 2 .0% Career Awareness 10 26 2 6 44 81.8% 2 2 .0% DECA 9 26 2 3 40 87.5% 1 1 100. 0% Drama Club 10 18 4 8 40 70.0% 1 1 100.0% Drill Team 20 20 100.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 37 51 3 8 3 1 103 85.4% 1 2 1 4 25.0% French Club 5 8 3 3 19 68.4% 1 1 .0% Football 50 2 52 96.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 100.0% Golf 2 4 6 .0% 1 1 .0% WOW Sr \u0026amp; Parents 25 37 8 10 1 81 76.5% 1 1 100.0% Journalism 2 4 7 10 23 26.1% 1 1 .0% Ring Staff-Jr 4 13 3 4 1 25 68.0% 1 1 .0% Ladies' Club 35 5 40 87.5% 3 3 100.0% Mu Alpha Theta 3 8 4 2 17 64.7% 1 1 .0% National Honor 10 19 7 9 1 46 63.0% 2 2 .0% Peer Counseling 9 22 5 9 45 68.9% 1 1 100.0% S.E.C.M.E. 17 22 1 5 45 86. 7% 1 1 100.0% Safety Council 6 5 2 2 15 73.3% 1 1 100.0% SAP 49 41 10 13 113 79.6% 1 1 .0% Spanish Club 7 24 2 17 2 1 53 58.5% 2 2 .0% Student Council 6 15 1 4 26 80.8% 1 1 .0% Teach. Tomorrow 13 1 14 92. 9% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Teens For Christ 1 3 36 40 2.5% 1 1 .0% Tennis 1 1 3 3 1 9 22.2% 1 1 .0% Track, Boys 24 24 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Track, Girls 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Volleyball 13 2 15 86. 7% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 .0% Fell. Chr. Ath. 18 1 1 20 90.0% 1 1 .0% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% 1 1 100.0% COE 2 12 1 6 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% Art Club 5 4 5 3 17 52.9% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 432 574 115 217 8 5 1351 74.5% 12 13 14 17 56 44.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Business Advisor 1 2 1 4 25.0% 1 2 3 3 9 33.3% CCE Advisory 1 1 100.0% 7 2 4 13 69.2% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Clear Sch Purpos 1 5 2 5 13 46.2% Discipline 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% Parent/Comm 1 2 2 5 10 30.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM Student Ach Time on Task Marketing BF 2 3 4 1 WM 1 2 WF 4 5 OM OF Total % 10 11 Black 50.0% 36.4% 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 1 1 4 OF Total % 3 Black .0% .0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 6 22 13 29 OM OF Total % Black 70 40.0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 8 9 8 34 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 12 2 TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS 8 5 HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 10 17 TOTAL 43 24 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 11 9 25 1 69 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 22 26 48 15 15 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Learn Strategies Viol Prevention GT Learn Styles TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 2 3 1 25 31 36 1 37 PAGE 1 FAIR PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 2 7 1 10 0 0 10.00 35.00 5.00 50.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 38.46 00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 45.00 45.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 7 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.75 43.75 00 37.50 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 3 16 00 16 % BLACK 66.67 100.00 100.00 00 00 60.00 66.67 62.50 62.50 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 14 1 16 13.89 38.89 2.78 44.44 0 .oo 0 .oo 36 36 % BLACK 52.78 52.78 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 17 3 3 0 0 38 84.2% P4 5 12 4 12 0 3 36 47.2% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 11 24 4 5 1 0 45 77.8% 02 13 12 2 1 2 1 31 80.6% 03 18 11 4 1 0 0 34 85.3% 04 7 8 3 1 0 0 19 78.9% 05 8 9 2 4 0 0 23 73.9% 06 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% Total 84 107 23 29 5 5 253 75.5% 33.2% 42.3% 9.1% 11.5% 2.0% 2.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POWELL R. 1 1 1 .0% K BROWN R. 1 7 9 1 2 19 84.2% K LEWIS L. 1 7 8 2 1 18 83.3% P4 COTHRAN D. 1 2 6 2 6 2 18 44.4% P4 PUSCH L. 1 3 6 2 6 1 18 50.0% 01 DELOZIER M. 1 6 12 2 1 1 22 81. 8% 01 POWELL R. 1 5 12 2 3 22 77.3% 02 CORBIN B. 1 5 3 1 9 88.9% 02 JAMES C. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RICE O. 1 7 9 2 1 2 21 76.2% 03 CORBIN B. 1 5 4 9 100.0% 03 TURNER M. 1 13 7 4 1 25 80.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 04 05 06 JAMES C. SHERWOOD S. CARTER C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 7 8 3 1 19 78.9% 8 9 2 3 22 77.3% 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 1 2 1 0 1 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 6 2 2 0 2 0 12 66.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 9 4 4 0 0 23 65.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 03 3 BF 2 1 WM WF OM OF Total % 1 Count Black 3 100.0% 2 100.0% 1 . 0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 2 50.0% Fire Marshal ls .0% .0% Student Council .0% 1 1 100.0% Peer Helpers .0% .0% Preschool Helper .0% .0% BASKETBALL 13 2 1 16 81.3% 2 2 100.0% CHEERLEADERS 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100. 0% AMBASSADORS 7 7 3 4 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% RECORDER GROUP 13 13 2 2 1 31 83.9% 1 1 100.0% CAMBIATA SINGERS 4 14 3 4 25 72 .0% .0% TOTAL 47 34 10 12 3 106 76.4% 3 3 2 8 75.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF \"A\"HONOR ROL \"B\"HONOR ROL \"AB\" HONOR CITIZENSHIP STU OF MONTH 4 5 3 TOTAL 4 5 3 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% 1 13 69.2% 1 13 69.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM 1 1 BF 1 WM WF 2 2 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black 33.3% 50.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 4 7 Black 50.0% 42.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Teacher Morale BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Student Handbook Science Fair Field Day BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Halloween Carniv Intl. Bazaar Grant Writing BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Com. PIE BCC BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .oi 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Discipline Student Council Journalism Newsp BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 6 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Pupil Serv. Team Guidance TOTAL BM BF 2 WM WF OM 1 4 OF Total 7 % Black .0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 1 4 2 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black .0% .0% 45.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP. CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Whole Language Multi Curriculum Computer Windows On Scien Reading RECOVERY K-4 CRUSADE TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1 6 7 PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1142","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Forest Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Forest Heights Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Franklin Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fulbright Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1142"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["234 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nForest Park Elementary, Forest Heights Elementary, Franklin Elementary, Fullbright Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nFOREST PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 1 9 0 19 0 0 3.45 31.03 00 65.52 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 29 00 29 % BLACK 100.00 35.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 34.48 34.48 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 33.33 CUSTODIANS 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 66.67 SUPERVISION AIDES 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 6 0 6 0 0 16 62.50 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 25.00 37.50 00 37.50 00 00 16 62.50 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 15 11.11 33.33 0 25 .00 55.56 0 .oo 0 .00 45 45 44.44 44.44 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 12 15 17 11 2 0 57 47.4% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 14 14 18 16 0 0 62 45.2% 02 14 18 23 17 0 1 73 43.8% 03 16 12 17 19 0 0 64 43.8% 04 11 18 16 19 0 1 65 44.6% 05 14 12 11 17 0 1 55 47.3% 06 15 19 11 10 1 0 56 60.7% Total 96 108 113 109 3 3 432 47.2% 22.2% 25.0% 26.2% 25.2% .7% .7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COLLINS c. 1 4 6 7 3 20 50.0% K MOORE C. 1 5 2 5 5 2 19 36.8% K SIGNAIGO c. 1 3 7 5 3 18 55.6% 01 WENGER C. 1 6 5 6 5 22 50.0% 01 WESTBROOK P. 1 3 4 5 6 18 38.9% 01 WHITE-ERWIN P. 1 5 5 7 5 22 45.5% 02 BAUMAN S. 1 5 7 8 5 25 48.0% 02 GWIN L. 1 4 7 8 6 25 44.0% 02 MACHEN J. 1 5 4 7 6 1 23 39.1% 03 GESTAUT H. 1 5 3 5 8 21 38 .1% 03 PENNY J. 1 5 5 6 5 21 47.6% 03 TURNER A. 1 6 4 6 6 22 45.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 CLEMENTS c. 1 5 4 4 7 20 45.0% 04 GIUSTI D. 1 3 8 5 7 23 47.8% 04 MARTIN M. 1 3 6 6 5 1 21 42.9% 04 WESTBROOK P. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TALLEY T. 1 7 5 7 7 1 27 44.4% 05 WILSON G. 1 7 7 4 10 28 50.0% 06 BALLARD J. 1 7 10 6 5 28 60.7% 06 LEMLE N. 1 8 9 5 5 1 28 60.7% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 3 2 3 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 5 4 2 3 0 0 14 64.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 12 20 43 50 0 2 127 25.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 1 1 2 BF WM WF 2 2 2 1 OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 5 80.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 8 8 11 1 33 39.4% 2 2 4 50.0% STU.COUN.OFFICER 1 1 2 3 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% JUST SAY NO 10 10 10 10 1 41 48.8% 2 1 3 66.7% PEER TUTORS 6 6 6 6 2 26 46.2% 1 1 100.0% MOTIVATORS 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 100.0% TOTAL 22 33 26 42 3 1 127 43.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 .0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 8 25.0% VIPS 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 5 10 20 35 42.9% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% TOTAL 6 16 28 50 44.0% 3 7 4 10 24 41. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 22 1 11 TESA 8 RACE RELATIONS 22 1 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 22 1 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 19 1 6 abacus 17 corr.ofeffec.sch 8 corp.lerng. 15 ann.sch.imp pln. 29 desegreg. 9 coe 26 27 9 at risk students 19 wind. on science 20 4 2 classroom mgt. 22 hands on math. 26 6 TOTAL 284 41 50 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 21 16 3 2 10 25 27 2 2 77 27 2 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 22 1 37 1 PAGE 1 FOREST HEIGHTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 5 9 4 13 0 0 31 45.16 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 1 0 3 0 0 5 40.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 3 1 2 0 0 6 50.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MUSIC 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100. 00 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 25.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 9 19 7 26 0 0 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 14.75 31.15 11.48 42.62 00 00 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 7 7 1 10 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 28.00 28.00 4.00 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 7 5 1 1 1 1 2 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 00 28.57 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 100.00 66.67 56.00 56.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 16 26 8 36 18.60 30.23 9.30 41.86 0 .oo 0 .oo 86 86 % BLACK 48.84 48.84 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 9 3 3 1 0 0 16 75.0% 07 77 69 32 34 3 7 222 65.8% 08 67 82 37 20 4 0 210 71.0% 09 83 75 28 26 3 1 216 73 .1% Total 236 229 100 81 10 8 664 70.0% 35.5% 34.5% 15.1% 12.2% 1.5% 1.2% LRSD 0- FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ALLEN F. 1 42 31 11 14 1 4 103 70.9% BAILEY R. 1 48 40 17 17 122 72 .1% BASS M. 1 32 38 21 18 1 3 113 61. 9% BEGGS M. 1 48 36 10 14 3 111 75. 7% BIRGE A. 1 44 34 10 14 2 104 75.0% BRADSHER P. 1 29 29 10 6 74 78.4% BRISCOE III J. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% BROWN A. 1 17 19 15 16 2 5 74 48.6% CARR P. 1 36 31 15 11 1 2 96 69.8% COBBS M. 1 30 15 5 2 1 53 84.9% COLE L. 1 35 41 17 11 1 1 106 71.7% CROMEDY v. 1 35 37 15 10 3 100 72.0% CROSS N. 1 29 34 20 19 1 3 106 59.4% DAVIS 8. 1 17 11 4 3 35 80.0% PETERSON K. 1 17 17 100.0% DUNCAN E. 1 51 32 11 12 3 1 110 75.5% LRSD 0-FOREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29~ School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNLAP D. 1 41 23 18 15 2 1 100 64.0% POSITION v. 1 9 1 10 90.0% FORE L. 1 28 36 16 12 1 93 68.8% GREEN II T. 1 49 57 36 18 1 161 65.8% HAMMAKER c. 1 42 32 11 14 1 4 104 71.2% HOLLOWAY G. 1 34 36 20 18 1 3 112 62.5% JOHNSON v. 1 32 49 9 15 105 77.1% JOHNSON T. 1 31 40 18 7 3 99 71. 7% JONES S. 1 40 44 17 12 1 1 115 73.0% KIDD L. 1 15 4 2 21 90.5% KIRCHNER L. 1 34 42 19 8 3 106 71. 7% BRUCE-LIPKINS E. 1 13 8 3 2 26 80.8% MAGEE M. 1 33 41 19 8 3 104 71.2% MAYS A. 1 36 42 19 7 3 107 72.9% MCCREE G. 1 37 30 11 14 1 4 97 69 .1% MCFADDEN S. 1 42 37 12 10 3 1 105 75.2% LRSD O. OREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MUELLER C. 1 11 18 6 4 39 74.4% NUNIS H. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% PIKE L. 1 31 37 21 18 1 3 111 61. 3% POOLE T. 1 35 40 18 12 1 106 70.8% POTURALSKI E. 1 12 5 1 18 66.7% PRICE L. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% ROBERTS c. 1 40 42 18 11 1 1 113 72.6% RUNDELL M. 1 16 18 10 7 2 53 64.2% SHERBETT K. 1 34 34 11 11 4 94 72. 3% SMITH JR v. 1 280 246 107 80 11 8 732 71. 9% POSITION v. 1 40 43 18 11 1 1 114 72.8% TAYLOR C. 1 23 19 5 3 1 51 82.4% THOMASON M. 1 27 16 8 8 1 60 71. 7% THOMAS M. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% TODD L. 1 19 30 17 16 1 1 84 58.3% WALKER Y. 1 27 40 18 7 3 95 70.5% LRSD 0-FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WILLIAMS K. 1 33 41 18 12 1 105 70.5% WILLIAMS G. 1 31 38 21 18 1 3 112 61. 6% WILLIAMS N. 1 25 10 10 5 5 55 63.6% ZAKRZEWSKI M. 1 43 36 10 14 1 4 108 73 .1% ZIMMERMAN D. 1 43 31 11 14 1 4 104 71. 2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Hearing Impaired 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.0% Mentally Retarded 10 8 2 1 0 0 21 85.7% Multihandicapped 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 19 7 5 0 1 0 32 81. 3% Speech or Language Impaired 12 6 6 4 0 0 28 64.3% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Visually Handicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 44 28 14 6 1 0 93 77.4% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 37 27 26 1 1 122 54.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 6 1 1 8 75.0% 08 2 1 2 5 60.0% 09 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 15 6 2 2 1 18 8 80.8% 08 15 4 2 1 17 5 86.4% 09 5 8 2 7 8 86.7% MATH 07 10 3 10 3 100.0% 08 15 9 1 1 16 10 92.3% 09 16 11 2 1 1 19 12 87 .1% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 21 8 1 1 1 23 9 90.6% 08 13 4 13 4 100.0% 09 15 6 2 1 1 18 7 84.0% SCIENCE 07 19 5 1 1 20 6 92.3% 08 7 2 1 1 8 3 81. 8% 09 26 19 4 1 1 31 20 88.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 35 58 40 38 2 2 175 53 .1% Math 30 34 36 30 4 2 136 47 .1% Science 28 51 41 32 2 1 155 51.0% Social Studies 32 35 28 49 3 1 148 45.3% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 125 178 145 149 11 6 614 49.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FBLA 4 13 3 6 26 65.4% 3 3 .0% FOOTBALL 26 9 35 74.3% 1 2 3 33.3% FRENCH CLUB 5 8 6 8 1 28 46.4% 1 1 .0% FUTURE HOME MK 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% GOLF .0% 1 1 .0% NAT. JR. HONOR 3 7 3 3 1 17 58.8% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILATORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPANISH CLUB 13 17 10 10 1 1 52 57.7% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL .0% 1 1 2 50.0% BASKETBALL ( B) .0% 1 1 2 100.0% BASKETBALL ( G) .0% 2 2 100.0% BETA CLUB 8 22 9 6 3 48 62.5% 2 2 .0% CARE CLUB .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHEERLEADERS 6 5 1 12 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black SOCCER .0% 1 1 100.0% TRACK ( B) 17 17 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TRACK ( G) 22 3 25 88.0% 2 2 100.0% VOLLEYBALL 20 9 1 30 66.7% 1 1 100.0% Y-TEENS 13 8 21 61. 9% 1 1 .0% CHOIR 19 37 5 12 73 76.7% 1 1 100.0% ADV. BAND 7 5 1 1 1 15 80.0% 1 1 100.0% INT. BAND 14 9 3 1 1 28 82 .1% 1 1 100.0% BEG. BAND 20 8 2 4 2 36 77.8% 1 1 100.0% FCLA 15 29 8 12 64 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% CHESS CLUB 4 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 .0% SAP 1 8 11 20 45.0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 156 245 63 102 9 4 579 69.3% 8 15 5 17 45 51. 1% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL-A 0 3 2 3 8 62.5% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 1 2 4 50.0% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 4 2 1 8 12.5% HONOR ROLL-B 09 4 18 5 13 2 42 52.4% HONOR ROLL-B 08 6 26 5 7 3 1 48 66.7% HONOR ROLL-B 07 8 16 17 4 1 46 52.2% TOTAL 22 64 33 29 4 4 156 55.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT PTA VIPS BM 1 BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 2 1 WF 2 1 1 OM 1 OF Total % 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 75.0% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ADMINSTATIVE COM 5 2 1 8 87.5% POTLUCK COMMITT 1 3 2 6 66.7% STEERING COMMIT. 1 3 1 5 10 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE ASSEMBLY COMMITT PUPIL SERVICES S.A.P. BM 1 2 BF 1 3 WM WF 4 2 OM OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 9 2 55.6% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black MENTORS COMMUNICATIONS RECRUITMENT 1 1 5 5 1 100.0% 5 . 0% 6 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TECHNOLOGY COMM. DISCIPLINE SUNSHINE COMM. 3 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 4 5 9 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black TOTAL 16 18 8 33 75 45.3% 2 4 4 10 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 32 TESA 32 45 RACE RELATIONS 29 1 1 HUMAN RELATIONS 32 2 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 25 2 1 EQTY MONITORING 7 SPECIAL ED MODIF 1 22 COE 55 58 MAGNET ARTS SCH 1 1 ATTENDANCE SEC 1 PARAPROF TRNG 1 MASTER SCDL-REG 1 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURTY 1 TOTAL 206 137 7 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 24 CYCLE 1 29 CYCLE 2 15 CYCLE 3 9 COOP. LEARNING 46 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 41 LEARNING STRAT. so MODIF. INSTRUCT. 6 3 3 STUDENTS AT RISK 4 58 TOTAL 174 108 3 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 43 3 CLASSROOM MGMT. 41 4 INTEG. ACAD. CLS 3 SECURITY INSERV AVOID\\FAIL. BEH. TOTAL 84 10 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 2 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURIT 2 2 MIDDLE SCHL LDSP 4 PEER HELP RETREA 2 CAREER ED. PLANG 1 SAP TRAINING 5 2 1 READING RENAISSA 2 ADD INS.-SPEC.ED 6 ANN REVW-SPEC.ED 4 COACHES MEETING 5 FAMILY MATH\u0026amp;SCI 4 GIFTED WORKSHOP 1 ALTERNATIVE EDUC 1 OASIS RENEWAL 6 COACHING CLINIC 2 CHECK IN TRAINNG 1 STANFORD 9 55 57 TITLE I CMPTR 2 FOOTBALL COACHES 3 HEALTH \u0026amp; PHYS ED 2 1 LRNG FNDTNS-DM TURNING POINTS 58 1 TEACHING TIPS 55 LIB. AUTOMATION 1 INFO. BYTE WORD TOTAL 76 206 4 FRANKLIN  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN POSITION B L A C K W H I T E OTHER TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 3 11 0 14 0 0 28 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 50.00 MUSIC 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ART 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 AUXILIARY TEACHER 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 3 18 0 21 0 0 42 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 7.14 42.86 00 50.00 00 00 42 50.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK NURSE SOCIAL WORKER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 18 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 6 31 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 15.38 79.49 2.56 2.56 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 4 1 1 1 23 2 39 00 39 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 95.65 100. 00 94.87 94.87 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 9 49 1 22 11.11 60.49 1.23 27.16 0 .oo 0 .00 81 81 % BLACK 71.60 71.60 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 32 39 2 1 1 0 75 94.7% P4 22 34 6 4 2 3 71 78.9% SP 11 4 2 1 0 0 18 83.3% 01 30 31 0 2 0 2 65 93.8% 02 30 27 1 2 1 0 61 93.4% 03 28 25 1 0 0 0 54 98 .1% 04 23 19 2 0 1 1 46 91. 3% 05 13 19 0 1 0 0 33 97.0% 06 12 24 0 0 0 2 38 94. 7% Total 201 222 14 11 5 8 461 91.8% 43.6% 48.2% 3.0% 2.4% 1.1% 1.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROOKS-TURNER K. 1 6 13 19 100.0% K BUTLER B. 1 8 9 2 19 89.5% K HOLLEY M. 1 9 9 1 19 94.7% K JACKSON s. 1 9 8 1 18 94.4% P4 BUCK J. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% P4 MCNULTY L. 1 4 10 3 1 18 77.8% P4 PARISH P. 1 4 11 1 1 1 18 83.3% P4 WINSTON J. 1 9 6 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 JENKINS T. 1 7 8 1 1 17 88.2% 01 MYRICK A. 1 6 8 1 15 93.3% 01 SIMPSON C. 1 10 7 17 100.0% 01 WATSON M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 ARNETT M. 1 4 8 1 13 92.3% 02 CAMPBELL S. 1 9 3 1 1 1 15 80.0% 02 JENKINS T. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 SNELLING N. 1 9 7 16 100.0% 02 WASHINGTON P. 1 8 8 16 100.0% 03 MULLINS T. 1 8 10 18 100.0% 03 STUBBLEFIELD G. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% 03 WIMBERLY J. 1 13 6 19 100.0% 04 ACOTT M. 1 6 7 1 14 92.9% 04 GADDY E. 1 8 7 1 1 17 88.2% 04 JORDAN D. 1 3 3 100.0% 04 KINARD L. 1 9 5 1 15 93.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 JACKSON JR J. 1 5 9 14 100.0% 05 JORDAN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% 05 MCMURRAY K. 1 8 10 1 19 94.7% 06 DILLARD C. 1 5 13 1 19 94.7% 06 GILES A. 1 7 11 1 19 94.7% 06 JORDAN D. 1 2 3 5 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Mentally Retarded 8 4 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100. 0% Specific Learning Disability 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 9 1 0 0 0 24 95.8% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 26 16 2 0 0 0 44 95.5% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 20 3 1 0 1 34 85.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 4 75.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 2 2 100.0% 06 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ACADEMIC GAMES BROWNIES CUB SCOUTS GIRLS SCOUTS MATH MANIPULATIV SEWING NEEDLEWOR SC !ENCE CLUB TOTAL .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE ADULT SPONSORS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A's 01 6 14 1 1 1 23 87.0% A's 02 4 7 11 100.0% A's 03 3 5 1 9 88.9% A's 04 1 1 100.0% A's 05 .0% A's 06 1 1 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 01 6 3 9 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 02 9 9 18 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 03 7 2 1 10 90.0% A\u0026amp;B 04 2 2 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 05 1 4 5 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 06 3 4 7 100.0% B's 01 1 1 100.0% B's 02 .0% B's 03 2 2 4 100.0% B's 05 1 1 100.0% B's 06 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Improve 01 4 4 100.0% Most Improve 02 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 03 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 04 2 2 100.0% Most Improve 05 1 1 100.0% Most Improve 06 1 1 100.0% Citizenship 01 5 8 1 1 15 86.7% Citizenship 02 9 17 26 100.0% Citizenship 03 9 11 1 1 22 90.9% Citizenship 04 3 3 100.0% Citizenship 05 1 3 2 6 66.7% Citizenship 06 3 6 9 100.0% TOTAL 75 111 5 2 2 2 197 94.4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 1 6 83.3% 1 2 1 4 75.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 2 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% READING COMMITTE 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % FIELD DAY COMMIT PARENT INVOLVEME SCIENCE FAIR 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 1 Black 4 100.0% 8 4 75.0% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 1 1 WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 1 100.0% 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black AUTHOR CONFERENC 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 100.0% SUNSHINE COMMITT 2 1 2 5 40.0% 1 1 100.0% PUBLIC AWARENESS 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BEHAVIOR MANAGEM SPIRIT COMMITTEE VIPS COMMITTEE 3 3 2 1 3 2 4 7 5 6 Black 42.9% 60.0% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 2 OM OF Total % Black .0% 2 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 3 35 3 24 65 58.5% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 20 1 1 24 91. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PARENT COUNC SOP 33 6 MULTIPLE INTELLI 33 22 TEACHING COMPUTE 36 6 GREAT EXPECTATIO 23 10 PHONIC READING 11 ABACUS 33 6 ACCELETR READER 7 SHURLEY METHOD 13 22 COE MATHPULATIVE 26 4 EXTD COMPRENSIVE 33 5 READING LA INSTR 2 THEMATIC UNIT 33 6 OPEN COURT 32 17 13 AETN 21 8 INCENTI SCH PLAN 27 READING STRAGEGI 19 TEAM BULIDING 45 PRINCIPAL INSTIT 1 SOC STUD TEXTBOO 19 READING PROGRAM 19 INTERNATI READIN 4 SUCCESS FOR ALL 45 4 SHURLEY METHOD 21 ACCELERATED READ 22 NEW CENTURY COMP 13 TOTAL 435 185 67 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ACCELERATE READ! TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 7 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CLASSROOM MGMT 33 INST AIDE MGMT 16 CLASSROOM DISCIP 27 10 AT RISK STUDENTS 33 15 TOTAL 60 33 25 16 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 POSTAL SERVICE 2 2 STRESS REDUCTION 29 9 HUMAN RELATIONS 27 12 EXTRAVANGANZA 5 PARENT WORKSHOP 3 2 AS400 2 1 PURCHASING 1 1 HIV \u0026amp; AIDS 1 3 GANG DYNAMICS 1 1 1 1 PROJECT SPIRIT 1 1 GREEN CIRCLE 1 1 CONFLICT 1 1 PARENT INVOLEMEN 31 6 OPEN COURT 34 11 TOTAL 95 52 27 18 FUIBRIGHT   POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 13 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 11 3 20 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 23 2 1 2 2 2 1 35 00 31.43 8.57 57.14 00 2.86 35 % BLACK 00 100.00 30.43 50.00 00 50.00 50.00 00 00 31.43 31.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 10 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 23.81 47.62 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 4 1 1 1 1 6 4 21 00 21 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 00 66.67 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT QUIZ:SSPLST B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 21 3 26 8.93 37.50 5.36 46.43 0 .oo 1 1.79 TOTAL 56 56 % BLACK 46.43 46.43 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 24 14 14 17 0 1 70 54.3% SP 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 25.0% 01 18 24 16 26 1 1 86 48.8% 02 22 7 10 26 1 0 66 43.9% 03 18 10 17 25 1 1 72 38.9% 04 17 19 18 17 0 0 71 50. 7% 05 24 14 9 16 2 0 65 58.5% 06 13 19 16 16 1 0 65 49.2% Total 137 107 103 143 6 3 499 48.9% 27.5% 21.4% 20.6% 28.7% 1.2% .6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COOPER D. 1 5 4 4 4 17 52.9% K FAUSETT L. 1 7 3 3 4 17 58.8% K HURD J. 1 6 5 2 5 18 61.1% K WYATT M. 1 6 2 5 4 1 18 44.4% 01 BUFFORD S, 1 2 2 .0% 01 JONES K. 1 4 7 4 6 1 22 50.0% 01 KAVANAUGH M. 1 4 6 5 7 22 45.5% 01 SIMPSON K. 1 5 5 4 7 21 47.6% 01 WESTLAKE B. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAY P. 1 8 4 4 7 23 52.2% 02 NASH E. 1 8 1 3 9 1 22 40.9% 02 PENN c. 1 6 2 3 10 21 38 .1% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 BUFFORD S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 DAVIS W. 1 5 6 4 8 1 24 45.8% 03 HARRIS s. 1 6 2 7 8 23 34.8% 03 WILSON J. 1 7 2 6 9 1 25 36.0% 04 ROBERTSON s. 1 5 7 6 7 25 48.0% 04 HONORE'-SMITH K. 1 6 7 6 4 23 56.5% 04 WATSON T. 1 6 5 6 6 23 47.8% 05 GADDIE o. 1 10 4 3 5 1 23 60.9% 05 GRINAGE K. 1 7 4 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 SMITH C. 1 1 1 100.0% 05 WILLIAMS I. 1 7 5 3 5 20 60.0% 06 FOOTE C. 1 2 7 6 7 22 40.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 ROBINSONS. SMITH C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 6 5 BF 6 6 WM 5 5 WF 5 4 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 22 21 54.5% 52.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 2 1 0 0 4 25.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 .0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 40.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 2 6 3 0 0 15 40.0% Visually Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 8 3 11 7 0 0 29 37.9% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 19 27 29 2 0 82 29.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 3 100.0% 01 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 2 50.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 4 7 8 10 29 37.9% 1 1 2 .0% Monitors 3 1 4 1 9 44.4% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 7 8 12 11 38 39.5% 2 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR V.I.P.S. 3 1 2 4 6 4 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 1 5 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 6 2 % Black 50.0% 16.7% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Recruitment 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 6 2 Black 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 1 Black 3 100.0% 1 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners 2 7 9 22.2% .0% TOTAL 9 2 18 29 31.0% 2 4 1 9 16 37.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 29 TESA 16 RACE RELATIONS 35 HUMAN RELATIONS 33 CULTURAL RELAT. Parent Cont. 35 TOTAL 113 35 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 9 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Multicult. Guide 26 AR Crusade 7 3 Math Task Ctr 4 Soc Stud Pilot 4 COOP. LEARNING 33 Int. Lang. Arts 34 TOTAL 66 45 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. Disc. Mgt. Pgd. Disc. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 27 33 23 6 83 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Integrating Curr Social Skills Tr TOTAL PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1155","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Badgett Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Hardin Bale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Baseline Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Booker T. Washington Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Brady Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Carver Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Central High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Chicot Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Cloverdale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Students","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1155"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["264 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nBadgett Elementary, Bale Elementary, Baseline Elementary, Booker Elementary, Brady Elementary, Carver Elementary, Central High, Chicot Elementary, Cloverdale Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nPOSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 10 0 9 0 0 5.00 50.00 00 45.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 54.55 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 55.00 55.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 9 0 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 26.67 60.00 00 13 .33 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 15 00 15 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.67 86.67 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 19 0 11 14.29 54.29 .oo 31.43 0 .oo 0 .oo 35 35 % BLACK 68.57 68.57 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 20 4 1 0 0 40 87.5% P4 13 21 0 2 0 0 36 94.4% SP 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 100.0% 01 18 15 0 1 0 0 34 97 .1% 02 17 12 0 2 0 0 31 93.5% 03 12 9 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 04 9 7 3 3 0 0 22 72. 7% 05 10 11 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 06 13 10 0 0 0 0 23 100.0% Total 113 107 7 11 0 0 238 92.4% 47.5% 45.0% 2.9% 4.6% .0% .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K PHILLIPS T. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% K WILLIS C. 1 8 11 1 20 95.0% P4 GADDY G. 1 7 10 17 100.0% P4 TRAYLOR K. 1 6 11 2 19 89.5% 01 BROOKS D. 1 8 6 1 15 93.3% 01 MCGOWAN D. 1 10 8 18 100.0% 02 MCLENNAN A. 1 9 6 2 17 88.2% 02 SINGER P. 1 8 6 14 100.0% 03 CAMPBELL E. 1 12 9 1 22 95.5% 04 HESSELBEIN A. 1 8 7 3 3 21 71.4% 04 PRUITT G. 1 1 1 2 100.0% 05 ALBERT R. 1 10 11 1 22 95.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 05 06 06 PRUITT G. PRUITT G. TRIMBLE 8. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 3 2 13 BF 1 10 WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 23 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% TOTALS 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 3 1 2 0 0 12 75.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 2 8 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100.0% AMBASSADORS 2 8 2 1 13 76.9% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 3 4 1 3 11 63.6% 1 1 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 4 3 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 100.0% LIBRARY MONITORS 2 5 1 8 87.5% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 4 3 2 9 77. 8% 1 1 100.0% FIRE MARSHALLS 2 1 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 19 32 8 10 69 73.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black CITZ OF WEEK K .0% CITZ OF WEEK 1 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 2 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 3 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 4 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 5 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 6 .0% HONOR ROLL K .0% HONOR ROLL 1 .0% - HONOR ROLL 2 .0% HONOR ROLL 3 .0% HONOR ROLL 4 .0% HONOR ROLL 5 .0% HONOR ROLL 6 .0% HONOR ROLL SC .0% PERFT ATTEND K .0% PERFT ATTEND 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 2 3 4 5 6 SC 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% HANDBOOK 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% RECRUITMENT 1 2 3 6 50.0% 2 3 1 6 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 16 18 OM OF Total % Black 35 48.6% BM 3 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 5 7 24 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA PET HUMAN RELATIONS COOP. LEARNING. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 7 9 16 6 45 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CULTURAL RELAT MULTICUL CURR. TOTAL 2 3 5 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 8 CONFLICT MGMT. 5 TOTAL 28 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK TOTAL 6 6 PAGE 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE POSITION BL A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 5 1 11 0 0 17 29.41 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 6 2 22 0 0 30 20.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 20.00 6.67 73.33 00 00 30 20.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 19.05 52.38 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 3 1 1 1 9 2 21 00 21 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 00 88.89 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 4 17 2 28 7.84 33.33 3.92 54.90 0 .00 0 .oo 51 51 % BLACK 41.18 41.18 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 20 5 4 4 0 52 75.0% P4 7 10 6 3 8 2 36 47.2% SP 3 2 1 0 0 0 6 83.3% 01 14 25 6 0 2 2 49 79.6% 02 19 19 4 4 1 1 48 79.2% 03 15 18 3 3 1 1 41 80.5% 04 17 16 4 4 0 0 41 80.5% 05 19 14 8 8 1 2 52 63.5% 06 19 14 1 2 2 0 38 86.8% Total 132 138 38 28 19 8 363 74.4% 36.4% 38.0% 10.5% 7.7% 5.2% 2.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% K HUTTO M. 1 6 6 2 1 2 17 70.6% K LITTELL T. 1 7 7 3 17 82.4% K SEILER D. 1 1 1 100. 0% K SHUTE K. 1 6 6 3 2 17 70.6% P4 GEURIN R. 1 4 5 3 2 3 1 18 50.0% P4 JOHNSON c. 1 3 5 3 1 5 1 18 44 .4% 01 BALENKO M. 1 7 13 3 1 1 25 80.0% 01 BROWN C. 1 7 12 3 1 1 24 79.2% 02 CONLEY F. 1 10 9 1 2 1 1 24 79.2% 02 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 TALLEY H. 1 9 10 3 1 23 82.6% 03 CUNNINGHAM L. 1 8 8 2 2 1 21 76.2% 03 FUNK P. 1 7 10 1 1 1 20 85.0% 03 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 FRANCIS L. 1 10 7 1 2 20 85.0% 04 UNDERWOOD-MOR L. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% 04 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 DOCKERY M. 1 10 6 4 4 1 25 64.0% 05 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TARKINGTON R. 1 9 7 4 3 2 25 64.0% 06 NELSON J. 1 10 8 2 20 90.0% 06 ROSBY K. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 06 SEILER D. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 33.3% Specific Learning Disability 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 8 4 5 4 0 0 21 57.1% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 14 7 10 6 0 0 37 56.8% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 14 12 3 5 1 1 36 72.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 20 16 4 6 1 3 50 72. 0% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Tutors 3 8 1 2 1 1 16 68.8% 1 1 100.0% Conflict Manager 11 4 1 2 18 83.3% 1 1 100.0% Sign-a-Thon 1 1 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 - H 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% HOST \u0026amp; HOSTESSES 11 8 1 4 24 79.2% 1 1 100.0% RECORDER .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 47 39 8 20 2 4 120 71. 7% 6 3 9 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERF ATT pERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's HIGHEST ACA GRADE BM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN SUNSHINE SUNSHINE CITIZENSHI,P GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE MOST IMPR LIFE PRIN AW TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 3 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR G/T BM BF WM WF 1 2 1 1 1 2 OM OF Total 2 3 3 % Black 50.0% 66. 7% .0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 4 1 2 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 8 % Black 50.0% 62.5% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCHOOL IMPROV CO RECRUITMENT COMM DISCIPLINE HEAR! 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 3 3 Black 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 WM WF 1 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 3 5 Black 66.7% 60.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TITLE I PLANNING EMERGENCY CRISIS GREAT EXPECTATIO BM BF WM WF 2 2 2 6 3 5 OM OF Total % Black 8 25.0% 5 40.0% 7 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC BLACK HISTORY PUPIL SERVICE TE BM BF 1 3 2 WM WF 2 1 5 OM OF Total 3 4 7 % Black 33.3% 75.0% 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARTNERS IN EDUC 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 100.0% MEMBERSHIP 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% ROOM MOTHERS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PTA COUNCIL 1 1 100.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% HOSPITALITY 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 100. 0% TOTAL 25 2 35 62 40.3% 4 15 3 8 30 63.3% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 5 5 TESA 9 RACE RELATIONS 5 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 38 5 1 CULTURAL RELAT. 2 AT RISK 16 PRESCHOOL INSERV 22 OPEN COURT 24 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 18 2 14 TOTAL 103 64 17 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 12 CYCLE 1 5 CYCLE 2 2 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 1 1 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 NEW BRIDGE 28 TRAINER OF TRAIN 2 CURR COMPACTING 1 TRI-D GIT 1 ADADE COMP/ENRI 1 NATL FACU INSTIT 3 CRITICAL/CREATI 1 Reading/Spelling 24 TOTAL 62 24 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 5 CLASSROOM MGMT. 20 1 POS CLASS MGMT 14 VIOLENCE PREVEN 1 MANAGER CONFLICT 1 STRESS MANAGEMEN 28 CLASSROOM MODIF 23 PS GRADES 1-6 12 PS SUPPORT STAFF 11 COOP TEAM LEARN 1 SP ED DISCIPLINE 1 PLAYGRD DISC TOTAL 117 1 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 2 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-..97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LEARN DISABIL 26 2 GANGS 26 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 26 LEARNING STYLES 26 SELF ESTEEM/ELE 16 MOTIVATION 28 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 33 3 READING/METRA 15 BEGIN YEAR STAFF 24 24 4 10 FRIST AID 4 1 PS K-12 INSTR A 7 2 ABACUS 27 2 LR-CDA TRAINING 2 G/E SP.EDU 22 INSTRU AIDES 4YR 2 2 INCLUSION (K) 3 SHURLEY 8 TEST DATA 15 New Teacher Trai 2 Marva Collins Se 5 TOTAL 242 116 19 18 BASELINE POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 9 1 8 0 0 18 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 15 2 12 0 0 29 51. 72 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 51.72 6.90 41.38 00 00 29 51. 72  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100. 00 MEDIA CLERK 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SECRETARY 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 1 9 0 0 0 0 10 100.00 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 16 0 3 0 1 23 82.61 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13.04 69.57 00 13 .04 00 4.35 23 82.61  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 3 31 2 15 5.77 59.62 3.85 28.85 0 .oo 1 1. 92 52 52 65.38 65.38   01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 28 0 5 3 1 54 83.3% P4 11 16 4 2 1 1 35 77 .1% SP 2 4 1 0 1 0 8 75.0% 01 25 19 3 4 3 1 55 80.0% 02 16 16 1 2 0 1 36 88.9% 03 17 23 0 5 3 1 49 81.6% 04 14 7 3 2 0 0 26 80.8% 05 17 11 4 2 0 2 36 77.8% 06 15 13 0 1 1 0 30 93.3% Total 134 137 16 23 12 7 329 82.4% 40.7% 41. 6% 4.9% 7.0% 3.6% 2.1%  01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K CLEVENGER s. 1 5 7 12 100.0% K JAMES M. 1 5 5 3 1 1 15 66.7% K LOVE B. 1 3 7 1 l 12 83.3% K SELF E. 1 4 8 1 1 14 85.7% P4 HILL D. 1 6 8 2 1 17 82.4% P4 SMITH M. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% 01 BELIN P. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 01 DEATON B. 1 10 7 2 1 20 85.0% 01 GARNER D. 1 7 5 3 1 1 17 70.6% 01 LAMB A. 1 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 02 BELIN P. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 02 SHARP c. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 THOMAS B. 1 8 9 1 18 94.4% 03 GLASON D. 1 8 12 2 2 1 25 80.0% 03 GRIMM B. 1 9 11 3 1 24 83.3% 04 BELIN P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 HUFFMAN C. 1 14 7 3 2 26 80.8% 05 HOOVER P. 1 8 6 2 1 1 18 77.8% 05 TATUM V. 1 9 5 2 1 1 18 77.8% 06 BOWMAN R. 1 7 6 1 14 92. 9% 06 PEARSON M. 1 8 7 1 16 93.8%  01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Multihandicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 3 0 2 0 0 10 80.0% TOTALS 12 4 0 2 0 0 18 88.9%  01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 4 11 0 1 0 0 16 93.8%  01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 2 3 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 03 1 3 4 100.0% 05 2 2 4 100.0% 06 1 1 .0%  01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Safety Patrol 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Tutors .0% .0% Morning Announce 2 1 3 66. 7% 1 1 100.0% Ambassadors 3 3 1 2 1 10 60.0% 1 1 .0% STOP Club 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Honors Club .0% .0% Just Say No 13 7 3 1 1 25 80.0% .0% Fire Marshals 3 3 6 100.0% .0% Student Council 5 5 2 1 1 1 15 66. 7% 2 2 .0% Drill Team 1 17 1 19 94. 7% 1 1 100.0% Student Represen 17 2 1 20 85.0% 2 2 100.0% Dance Team Rep 7 16 3 2 1 29 79.3% 1 1 100.0% Choir .0% 2 1 3 66.7% TOTAL 40 72 15 19 10 11 167 67 .1% 7 1 5 13 53.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's K 4 2 6 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors K 5 7 12 100.0% All A's ls 2 10 1 13 92.3% A \u0026amp; B Honors ls 8 7 2 1 18 83.3% All A's 2n 2 1 3 66.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors 2n 2 5 2 1 10 70.0% All A's 3r 2 2 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 3r 5 2 2 1 10 70.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 4t 1 5 1 7 85.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors St 3 1 4 75.0% All A's 6t 2 1 3 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 6t 4 2 6 66.7% TOTAL 31 48 3 10 2 94 84.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS 2 2 1 2 2 100.0% 4 50.0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1  11/03/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 3 2 2 3 6 33.3% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Pupil Services BM BF 1 2 3 WM WF 2 2 2 OM OF Total 3 4 5 % Black 33.3% 50.0% 60.0% BM 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 2 OM  2 OF Total 2 2 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC Discipline Sunshine BM BF 2 3 3 WM WF OM 1 1 3 OF Total 3 % Black 66.7% 3 100.0% 7 42.9% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE School Safety STUDENT COUNCIL FIELD DAY BM BF 5 2 4 WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 5 Black 83.3% 66.7% 80.0% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROFESSIONAL GRO STOP COTILLION PROGR BM BF 1 1 2 WM WF 1 3 1 OM OF Total 2 4 3 % Black 50.0% 25.0% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .\u0026gt; 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLACK HISTORY MO COE SCHOOL RECRUITME BM BF 2 1 2 WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total 4 3 3 % Black 50.0% 33.3% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3  6 OF Total 3 % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM TOTAL 39 2 24 OF Total % Black 65 60.0% BM  11/03/97 PAGE 7 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 5 10 17 41. 2% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 20 Curriculum Study Leadership Acad 1 Mastery Learning Multi-C Counsel. Abacus 20 PET 25 WHOLE LANGUAGE 2 COOP LEARNING 15 SAT -8 TEST INTE 20 SDDI 20 COE 20 PATHWAYS TO EXCE 20 AR READING ASSO. 3 TOTAL 76 103  11/03/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 13 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 11/03/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 26 CYCLE 1 17 CYCLE 2 8 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 15 ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULTURAL DIVERS! 1 LEARNING STYLES 4 TOTAL 72  PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97  PAGE 1 Ba)KER -    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 12 1 18 0 0 32 40.63 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 17 6 26 0 0 50 36.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.00 34.00 12.00 52.00 00 00 so 36.00  POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES OTHER LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 6 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.18 68.18 00 13. 64 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7 4 1 2 1 1 5 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 85.71 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 86.36 86.36  POSITION TOTAL PERCENT  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 32 6 29 6.94 44.44 8.33 40.28 0 .OD 0 .oo 72 72 % BLACK 51.39 51.39    01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 22 17 18 1 2 77 50.6% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 20 26 12 13 2 1 74 62.2% 02 16 27 15 21 5 1 85 50.6% 03 23 22 20 17 1 2 85 52.9% 04 22 24 18 21 1 3 89 51. 7% 05 27 21 22 20 1 4 95 50.5% 06 29 20 19 25 2 1 96 51.0% Total 154 162 123 135 13 14 601 52.6% 25.6% 27.0% 20.5% 22.5% 2.2% 2.3%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROWN M. 1 3 7 5 5 20 50.0% K HURST M. 1 4 6 4 4 1 19 52.6% K JEFFRIES v. 1 5 4 4 4 2 19 47.4% K WALLS B. 1 5 5 4 5 19 52.6% 01 FARLEY J. 1 6 5 3 5 19 57.9% 01 HESTIR J. 1 5 7 4 2 1 19 63.2% 01 JONES A. 1 5 6 1 4 1 17 64.7% 01 HARRIS K. 1 4 8 4 2 1 19 63.2% 02 FAIR D. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAVES I. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 HIGDON T. 1 4 6 3 6 2 21 47.6% 02 TAGGART M. 1 4 7 3 5 2 21 52.4%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 ELLINGTON L. l 6 5 5 4 l 21 52.4% 03 FUTRELL C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 22 50.0% 03 HALLUM A. 1 5 6 5 4 1 21 52.4% 03 TUCKER T. 1 6 6 5 4 21 57 .1% 04 AUSTIN C. 1 5 6 5 6 1 23 47.8% 04 ELLINGTON L. 1 1 1 .0% 04 HARDING C. 1 7 5 4 4 1 21 57 .1% 04 HAYDEN D. 1 5 6 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 TAYLOR c. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 HIPPS D. 1 7 6 6 5 1 25 52.0% 05 JOHNSON M. 1 7 5 6 5 1 24 50.0% 05 KELLEY C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 2 24 45.8%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 LEHNHOFF D. 1 7 5 5 5 22 54.5% 06 COLFORD S. 1 7 6 4 7 24 54.2% 06 HARRIS P. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 06 HARRIS K. 1 1 1 .0% 06 NEWCOMB D. 1 8 4 5 6 1 24 50.0% 06 WEIR N. 1 7 5 4 7 1 24 50.0%   01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 5 2 4 1 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 8 3 5 1 0 0 17 64.7%   01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 13 15 31 23 2 4 88 31. 8%   01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 3 1 1 5 80.0% 01 2 1 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 .0% 03 2 1 3 66.7% 04 1 1 100.0%   01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 27 21 14 31 2 2 97 49.5% 1 1 2 50.0% Jazzy Jaguars 18 11 18 14 3 64 45.3% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Helpers 6 10 7 10 1 1 35 45.7% 1 1 2 50.0% BAMBIS 12 12 12 12 48 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council .0% 2 2 .0% Fire Marshal ls 1 2 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DARE 24 28 20 20 2 1 95 54.7% 1 3 4 25.0% TOTAL 89 84 73 89 5 7 347 49.9% 1 6 9 16 43.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF BIRACIAL P.T.A. BOARD MBR Discipline Hear 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 2 2 8 Black 50.0% .0% 50.0% BM 1 2  10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 4 2 2 17 4 25 Black 50.0% 24.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Field Day Parent Involment Reading BM 1 BF 2 1 2 WM WF 3 4 1 OM OF Total 5 6 3 % Black 40.0% 33.3% 66.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 5  2 OF Total 9 % Black .0% .0% 44.4%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Awards/Honors School Spirit Science Fair BM BF 2 1 1 WM 1 WF 2 5 2 OM OF Total % 5 6 3 Black 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 7 3 WM 2 WF OM 4  3 OF Total % 11 5 Black 63.6% 60.0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Behavior Mange. COE BM 1 1 BF WM 4 3 1 1 WF 3 2 2 OM OF Total % 7 4 7 Black 57 .1% 25.0% 57 .1% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 2  4 OF Total % 6 Black .0% 66.7% .0%   01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners In Ed 1 1 2 50.0% .0% School Safety 2 1 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TOTAL 6 22 5 32 65 43 .1% 7 20 7 28 62 43.5%  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 39 TESA 31 HUMAN RELATIONS 47 TEAM BUILDING 50 TOTAL 167  10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 10  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CYCLE 1 23 CYCLE 2 6 CYCLE 3 8 COOP. LEARNING 48 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 TOTAL 89  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. 42 TOTAL 42  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Learning styles 48 Testing 50 TOTAL 98  PAGE 1 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 8 1 18 0 0 00 29.63 3.70 66.67 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 18 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 27 00 27 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 29.63 29.63 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 2 12 1 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 11. 76 70.59 5.88 11. 76 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 2 1 1 5 4 17 00 17 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.35 82.35 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 2 20 2 20 4.55 45.45 4.55 45.45 0 .oo 0 .oo 44 44 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 17 5 10 1 2 54 66.7% P4 4 5 4 4 1 0 18 50.0% SP 6 0 1 1 0 0 8 75.0% 01 26 20 6 8 1 1 62 74.2% 02 21 16 11 10 3 2 63 58. 7% 03 21 15 9 2 1 1 49 73.5% 04 17 8 3 4 6 7 45 55.6% 05 18 9 4 8 3 2 44 61.4% 06 5 10 6 0 4 3 28 53.6% Total 137 100 49 47 20 18 371 63.9% 36.9% 27.0% 13.2% 12.7% 5.4% 4.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DUGAN F. 1 7 6 1 4 1 19 68.4% K JONES P. 1 5 4 4 3 16 56.3% K TOLBERT I. 1 7 7 2 1 1 18 77.8% K WASHINGTON M. 1 1 1 .0% P4 MCCLURKAN E. 1 4 5 4 4 1 18 50.0% 01 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 KOON B. 1 1 1 .0% 01 ROSE s. 1 9 7 2 1 1 20 80.0% 01 SCRUBBS v. 1 8 6 2 4 20 70.0% 01 WASHINGTON M. 1 9 7 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 CROMEDY G. 1 6 5 3 2 2 1 19 57.9% 02 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 HARROD A. 1 8 6 3 5 22 63.6% 02 KOON B. 1 7 4 5 3 1 1 21 52.4% 03 JOHNSON D. 1 13 9 2 1 25 88.0% 03 OLIVERS. 1 8 6 7 2 1 24 58.3% 04 GOVAR M. 1 8 3 2 3 5 21 52.4% 04 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 2 100.0% 04 YOUNGE. 1 9 5 1 1 6 2 24 58.3% 05 HANNAHS B. 1 10 4 2 2 2 20 70.0% 05 HIGHT R. 1 8 5 2 6 1 2 24 54.2% 05 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 06 HANNAHS B. 1 1 1 100.0% 06 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Count Black 06 VARDAMAN T. 1 5 9 6 4 3 27 51. 9% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 2 3 1 0 11 45.5% Visually Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 10 1 3 5 1 0 20 55.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 5 8 2 5 0 25 40.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 2 100.0% 01 2 1 3 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 6 3 4 4 17 52.9% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILITATOR 10 9 2 3 1 3 28 67.9% 1 1 .0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 18 10 7 6 6 5 52 53.8% 1 1 .0% BRADY SCH.CHOIR 9 9 5 6 5 5 39 46.2% 1 1 .0% GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENT 5 5 8 2 5 25 40.0% 1 1 .0% DRILL TEAM 14 4 5 23 60.9% 2 2 100.0% CHAPTER I READIN 36 18 5 3 3 7 72 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHAPTER I MATH 22 18 5 4 5 5 59 67.8% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 10 9 3 2 1 4 29 65.5% 1 1 .0% AMBASSADORS 7 5 4 4 1 1 22 54.5% 1 1 .0% CONFLICT MANAGRS 15 10 3 2 6 1 37 67.6% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 138 110 46 40 33 36 403 61.5% 4 11 15 26.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Imp Aca K- 3 1 1 8 13 30.8% Prine. (A's) 1- 8 9 10 10 8 4 49 34.7% Hon.Rol(A/B) 1- 34 21 13 12 3 14 97 56.7% Citizenship P- 58 37 20 23 11 20 169 56.2% Attendance P- 30 25 12 9 8 17 101 54.5% Most Imp Cit K- 3 6 2 6 2 5 24 37.5% TOTAL 136 99 57 61 32 68 453 51. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MEM 1 1 1 3 6 33.3% 1 2 1 3 7 42.9% VIPS/P.I.E 1 1 2 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO SCH.RECRUIT TEAM BM BF 2 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % 5 Black .0% .0% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TEXTBOOK SELECT BUILDING COORDIN STAFF DEV COMM BM BF 3 2 WM WF 1 1 3 2 OM OF Total % 1 7 4 Black 42.9% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GUIDANCE COMM FIELD DAY MEDIA CONSULTANT BM BF WM WF 3 1 4 4 1 OM OF Total 7 5 1 % Black 42.9% 20.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TALENT SHOW STUDENT COUNCIL PUPIL SERVICES BM BF WM WF 2 3 2 2 4 OM OF Total % 4 2 7 Black 50.0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 1 1 Black 2 50.0% 1 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SUNSHINE COMM DISCIPLINE MANAG GRANT WRITING BM BF WM WF 1 4 1 6 1 1 OM OF Total 7 6 1 % Black 14.3% 66.7% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 7 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black GRADE LEVEL CH 3 4 7 42.9% .0% MULTICULTURAL CM 2 6 8 25.0% .0% TOTAL 2 30 6 49 87 36.8% 2 9 1 9 21 52.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 14 TESA 12 RACE RELATIONS 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 10 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 2 3 PRE SCHOOL INSER 12 15 SCHOOL LAW 12 COE 15 READING STYLES 13 MULTICULT ED 10 6 BRADY MISSION ST 11 EARLY CHILDHOOD 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 128 16 9 4 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING WINNEBAGO COMPUTER PROGRAM LIBRARY IN SERV WINDOWS 95 WORDS 1 WORDS@ POWER POINT 1 POWER POINT 2 TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 10 6 2 12 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 49 9 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 14 CLASSROOM MGMT. 15 POSITIVE DISCIP. 4 SCHOOL LAW 12 SCHOOL WIDE DISC 9 6 6 CLASSROOM MANAG 15 TOTAL 65 4 6 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 14 LEARNING STYLES 20 SELF ESTEEM 8 2 4 PORTOFOLIO ASSES 16 1 INTERGRAT CURRIC 12 ABACUS TRAINING 14 WINDOW ON SCIENC 8 2 PARENT INVOLVE 8 2 SIP 5 1 1 TEACHER EVALUAT 6 1 COMPUTER INSERV 10 9 1 2 MATH MANIULATIV 9 8 ESL/LEP 9 30 1 3 SELF ESTEEM 8 5 WRIT ACROSS CURR 9 REACH INSERVICE 12 SCIENCE HANDS-ON 13 2 AR K-4 CRUSADE 1 POLAROID CAMERA 2 EARLY CDLHD CONV 4 SOC STUD INSERV 25 26 SUCCESS FOR ALL 15 TOTAL 206 103 10 10 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE CURRICULUM SPECIALIST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 23 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 33 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 13 1 30 0 1 46 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.17 28.26 2.17 65.22 00 2.17 46 % BLACK 00 100.00 24.24 50.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 16.00 60.00 00 24.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 5 5 1 2 1 5 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 50.00 00 60.00 83.33 76.00 76.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 28 1 36 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7.04 39.44 1.41 50.70 0 .oo 1. 41 71 71 % BLACK 46.48 46.48 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 9 21 16 10 2 1 59 50.8% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 21 16 19 11 1 1 69 53.6% 02 22 23 26 16 1 2 90 50.0% 03 29 19 19 19 3 1 90 53.3% 04 32 20 25 11 1 5 94 55.3% 05 31 19 25 21 2 2 100 50.0% 06 24 26 20 22 0 2 94 53.2% Total 168 144 150 110 10 14 596 52.3% 28.2% 24.2% 25.2% 18.5% 1. 7% 2.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DANIELS. 1 4 7 5 2 1 1 20 55.0% K DOYNE A. 1 3 7 6 4 20 50.0% K HOOKER M. 1 2 7 5 4 1 19 47.4% 01 GLENN L. 1 7 5 6 4 1 23 52.2% 01 HAMPTON H. l 7 5 7 3 1 23 52.2% 01 SKUBAL E. 1 7 6 6 4 23 56.5% 02 JOSEPH J. 1 6 6 7 4 23 52.2% 02 SMITH-MALLETT G. 1 6 7 6 2 1 22 59.1% 02 MCKENDRY S. 1 5 6 6 6 23 47.8% 02 YARBROUGH L. 1 5 4 7 4 1 1 22 40.9% 03 CARTWRIGHT J. 1 6 5 5 4 2 22 50.0% 03 HURD L. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 MUNNS P. 1 9 5 4 4 22 63.6% 03 PENN P. 1 7 4 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 BUCK v. 1 9 5 6 2 1 23 60.9% 04 HARRISON K. 1 8 5 6 4 1 24 54.2% 04 JESTER J. 1 8 4 6 3 1 2 24 50.0% 04 MUNNS P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 WASHINGTON K. 1 7 5 7 2 1 22 54.5% 05 BLANKENSHIP K. 1 8 4 6 5 1 1 25 48.0% 05 GLENN B. 1 8 4 7 5 1 25 48.0% 05 HARNESS E. 1 8 6 5 5 1 25 56.0% 05 PACE T. 1 7 5 7 6 25 48.0% 06 BYRD D. 1 6 6 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Teacher 06 06 06 FLEMING L. SHIELDS H. THOMAS V. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 6 6 5 6 23 52.2% 6 7 5 5 1 24 54.2% 6 7 5 6 24 54.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPR03 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 87.5% TOTALS 11 1 2 1 0 0 15 80.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 29 20 52 45 3 9 158 31.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 1 3 66.7% 01 1 1 .0% 02 1 1 1 3 33.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE  1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FIRE MARSHALS 2 1 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO 23 27 22 21 1 94 53.2% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 2 3 7 1 14 21. 4% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 4 8 7 9 1 29 41.4% 1 1 2 50.0% AMBASSADORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% MATH OLYMPAID .0% 1 1 .0% SCIENCE CLUB 4 3 3 3 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% NEWS TEAM 4 5 5 4 1 19 47.4% 1 1 .0% ODESSY OF MIND .0% 1 1 .0% THINKING CAP QUI 2 2 3 5 1 2 15 26. 7% 1 1 .0% SUMMER READING 37 36 13 6 92 79.3% 2 1 5 8 25.0% MATH FAIR .0% 1 1 .0% INVENT AMERICA .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCIENCE FAIR .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPACE FAIR .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black CARDINAL CLUB 9 8 6 23 39.1% .0% TOTAL 77 93 65 63 2 5 305 55.7% 10 1 17 28 35.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black COURT. KIDS K .0% COURT. KIDS 1 .0% COURT. KIDS 2 .0% COURT. KIDS 3 .0% COURT. KIDS 4 .0% COURT. KIDS 5 .0% COURT. KIDS 6 .0% A HONOR ROLL lS 9 7 15 10 1 1 43 37.2% A/B HONOR RL lS 8 9 3 1 21 81.0% A HONOR ROLL 2N 5 8 15 12 2 42 31.0% A/B HONOR RL 2N 11 7 1 3 1 1 24 75.0% A HONOR ROLL 3R 6 4 18 7 1 5 41 24.4% A/B HONOR RL 3R 9 7 3 4 23 69.6% A HONOR ROLL 4T 4 6 13 15 2 2 42 23.8% A/B HONOR RL 4T 12 7 10 4 33 57.6% A HONOR ROLL ST .0% A/B HONOR RL ST .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A HONOR ROLL 6T .0% A/B HONOR RO 6T .0% TOTAL 64 55 78 56 7 9 269 44.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 7 12 41. 7% VIPS 1 1 1 1 4 25.0% 2 2 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PUPIL SERV. TEAM LEADERSHIP COE RECRUITMENT TEAM 2 4 2 1 5 10 2 7 15 4 Black 28.6% 26.7% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black .0% 33.3% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % STP CONSULT TEAM BCC HONORS COMMITTEE 5 2 2 1 2 7 2 3 1 13 7 5 Black 38.5% 28.6% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % GIT SCH. COMMITT HEALTH ACTION TM COURT. KIDS 4 2 2 1 6 1 10 3 3 Black 40.0% 66.7% 66.7% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM 4 OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 28 6 41 2 77 36.4% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 5 8 2 18 33 39.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 42 TESA 32 RACE RELATIONS 17 HUMAN RELATIONS 17 CULTURAL RELAT. 12 AT-RISK 25 TOTAL 145 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 3 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 32 11 5 34 2 2 84 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 30 1 CLASSROOM MGMT. 33 GOALS OF MISBEHA 40 5 POSITIVE DISPLIN 40 5 GREEN CIRCLE 4 TOTAL 147 11 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LITERATURE BASED 22 BALANCED WRITING 2 WHOLE LANGUAGE 21 WRITE MORE LEARN 2 MAST/FOSS TRAIN! 20 WRITE GRP WKSP 7 LEARNING STYLES 8 ADD/ADHD 8 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 5 INTEGRATING CURR 29 HAT TRAINING 3 MATH/LANG ART PR 33 DEFIANT CHILD 46 SCHOOL IMPROVEME 48  MULTIPLE INTELLI 49 AETN-CRIT. VIEW! 45 ECOE INTRODUCTIO 40 TEACH SELF DISC! 45 MC RAT 5 3 DISCIPLINE MGMT 8 CMSIMON AWARD 2 EXPANING REACH 2 PATHWAY TO EXCEL 43 G/T IDENTIFICATI 40 LRSD SCIENCE 30 TOTAL 563 3    POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE AUXILIARY TEACHER SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 10 17 11 37 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 POSITIONS 16 31 21 47 0 0 13.91 26.96 18.26 40.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 1 5 75 10 6 2 4 1 3 3 1 2 115 00 115 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 60.00 36.00 80.00 33.33 00 50.00 00 33.33 00 00 50.00 40.87 40.87 NO\\I 4 i997 Qrr\\CE Of DtSEGl\\tGA110N MOtU10RING POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY SECURITY OFFICER SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 14 17 1 8 0 2 SUBTOTAL PERCENT QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 11 13 1 1 7 5 1 42 33.33 40.48 2.38 19.05 00 4.76 42 % BLACK 66.67 72.73 92.31 00 00 42.86 100.00 100.00 73.81 73.81 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 30 48 22 55 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.11 30.57 14.01 35.03 0 .oo 1. 27 157 157 % BLACK 49.68 49.68 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 20 12 0 0 0 1 33 97.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 10 210 246 113 127 8 7 711 64 .1% 11 160 204 122 148 10 5 649 56 .1% 12 104 139 93 100 7 10 453 53.6% Total 494 601 328 375 25 23 1846 59.3% 26.8% 32.6% 17.8% 20.3% 1.4% 1. 2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADAIR G. 1 4 3 1 8 87.5% ATKINS L. 1 41 59 21 15 1 137 73.0% BECKER M. 1 15 38 37 53 1 144 36.8% BLAIR S. 1 5 1 2 8 62.5% BLEVINS P. 1 26 36 23 30 1 1 117 53.0% BOYETTE. 1 26 57 24 32 1 140 59.3% BRACK R. 1 28 72 5 16 2 1 124 80.6% BRANDON E. 1 44 43 12 5 4 108 80.6% BROADNAX-THRA B. 1 52 52 10 10 1 125 83.2% BROOKS S. 1 34 50 20 11 1 1 117 71.8% BROWN J. 1 9 12 37 45 5 5 113 18.6% CALDWELL s. 1 4 12 24 54 3 7 104 15.4% CALLAWAY N. 1 32 33 18 22 2 1 108 60.2% CARR P. 1 37 52 21 18 2 130 68.5% CARUTH P. 1 11 16 26 39 2 3 97 27.8% CHAMBLISS P. 1 12 17 14 38 3 4 88 33.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black CHANDLER J. 1 40 44 12 10 2 108 77.8% COBB J. 1 4 10 35 52 6 9 116 12 .1% COLBURN M. 1 19 46 31 35 2 3 136 47.8% COLE J. 1 15 18 16 38 2 3 92 35.9% COLLINS R. 1 45 49 13 9 2 118 79.7% COONS. 1 39 17 35 45 2 138 40.6% COOPER V. 1 33 41 24 27 3 2 130 56.9% CORTINEZ K. 1 23 34 33 47 2 1 140 40.7% COX B. 1 40 49 21 22 132 67.4% DANIEL B. 1 7 6 44 19 5 7 88 14.8% DAVIS M. 1 48 33 6 6 3 96 84.4% DEITZ s. 1 19 17 24 19 2 8 89 40.4% DIXON s. 1 40 47 16 13 2 2 120 72.5% DONHAM M. 1 13 29 30 42 2 2 118 35.6% DUMAS E. 1 1 1 100. 0% EASTER M. 1 12 24 29 51 2 2 120 30.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDWARDS J. 1 38 42 19 26 1 126 63.5% EVANS K. 1 25 33 18 12 88 65.9% FIELDS W. 1 21 31 7 1 1 61 85.2% FITZPATRICK Jo. 1 44 48 28 30 150 61. 3% FUTRELL B. 1 32 60 10 21 1 124 74.2% GADBERRY s. 1 6 15 37 69 3 4 134 15. 7% GADDY H. 1 25 11 1 1 38 94.7% GATES K. 1 18 36 33 47 3 137 39.4% GAY A. 1 39 45 21 21 4 130 64.6% GRAY J. 1 58 37 10 2 2 1 110 86.4% GUY K. 1 1 1 100.0% HALL-JONES B. 1 28 9 2 39 94.9% HAMMONS K. 1 41 30 8 8 2 89 79.8% HARDIN G. 1 13 18 30 33 4 3 101 30.7% HARGIS A. 1 9 18 36 69 1 2 135 20.0% HARRIS H. 1 44 32 17 29 3 3 128 59.4% LR~D ' SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HOFFMAN M. 1 27 37 21 19 1 3 108 59.3% HOLLADAY K. 1 28 37 24 36 125 52.0% HOWARD R. 1 8 3 11 100.0% HUFFORD G. 1 6 16 36 49 5 6 118 18.6% JAMES B. 1 1 1 100.0% JERNIGAN R. 1 31 47 21 24 1 124 62.9% KALB M. 1 33 33 23 29 1 3 122 54 .1% KEARNEY L. 1 11 11 39 24 3 1 89 24.7% LENIEAR H. 1 34 40 23 25 1 123 60.2% LIGON M. 1 11 16 31 24 1 2 85 31. 8% LOYA s. 1 23 43 20 30 1 117 56.4% MAYS G. 1 33 43 18 26 4 124 61. 3% MCDONALD D. 1 34 33 23 14 2 106 63.2% MCDONALD T. 1 2 12 11 14 39 35.9% MCLENDON J. 1 43 40 25 27 1 1 137 60.6% MCMURRAY v. 1 42 48 20 25 1 136 66.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MEADOWS M. 1 43 44 13 3 2 105 82.9% BARNUM R. l 3 12 3 18 83.3% BERRY D. 1 10 4 3 17 82.4% EACKLES v. 1 6 6 100.0% GRUMMER JR c. 1 7 2 2 2 13 69.2% BURCHETT s. 1 12 12 100.0% PERRY M. 1 11 9 3 23 87.0% SKIPPER J. 1 30 6 3 39 92.3% SODERLING L. 1 38 38 100.0% TENPENNY A. 1 6 14 20 100.0% MCCREE D. 1 3 3 100.0% MILES B. 1 6 3 9 100. 0% PRATHER L. 1 26 2 28 92.9% MILLER B. 1 51 41 12 11 1 1 117 78.6% MILLER R. 1 28 48 24 19 6 125 60.8% MOORE K. 1 32 50 23 27 1 133 61. 7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C'S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MORRIS W. 1 1 1 100.0% NASH L. 1 41 45 15 4 1 106 81.1% NASH D. 1 33 41 27 23 124 59. 7% PAIGE JR w. 1 38 28 31 6 4 107 61.7% PAULS. 1 31 54 21 11 2 119 71. 4% PAXTON v. 1 40 53 12 10 2 117 79.5% PEYTON E. 1 27 39 26 6 98 67.3% PIERCE M. 1 40 45 15 15 1 116 73.3% PIERCE s. 1 49 44 8 7 1 109 85.3% PITTMAN c. 1 7 20 30 61 1 119 22.7% POST J. 1 62 29 2 1 94 96.8% REEDY J. 1 32 51 18 25 2 2 130 63.8% ROBERTSON JR T. 1 26 46 13 2 1 88 81.8% ROBINSON c. 1 17 30 12 5 1 65 72. 3% ROUSSEAU N. 1 3 4 5 3 15 46. 7% RUTLEDGE M. 1 34 52 20 21 2 1 130 66.2% LR$D  SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SCHLESINGER D. 1 35 12 5 4 1 57 82.5% SEWARD D. 1 44 49 15 14 2 1 125 74.4% SHOFNER K. 1 43 44 15 18 1 121 71.9% SIEGEL L. 1 35 48 18 24 3 3 131 63.4% SIEGEL T. 1 3 1 4 .0% SNODGRASS A. 1 44 47 14 6 1 112 81.3% STAFFORD B. 1 27 51 19 24 3 2 126 61. 9% STEADMAN A. 1 14 32 29 44 2 4 125 36.8% TEETER E. 1 52 40 9 14 2 117 78.6% THOMAS A. 1 58 so 13 1 122 88.5% THOMPSON F. 1 56 47 3 2 6 114 90.4% THOMPSON J. 1 19 32 38 49 2 1 141 36.2% THOMPSON L. 1 11 41 32 46 2 4 136 38.2% THREATT c. 1 42 48 20 10 1 121 74.4% VENABLE G. 1 13 67 4 2 1 2 89 89.9% WALKER R. 1 30 49 14 27 2 1 123 64.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WATSON B. 1 8 15 37 54 4 3 121 19.0% WHISTLE V. 1 38 58 17 15 128 75.0% WHITEHORN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% WILDER B. 1 22 37 18 23 2 1 103 57.3% WILLIAMS B. 1 1 1 .0% WILLIAMSON M. 1 22 8 2 32 93.8% WILLIAMS G. 1 20 11 2 33 93.9% WILLIS E. 1 37 34 18 11 100 71.0% WILSON C. 1 37 40 20 28 1 1 127 60.6% WILSON N. 1 34 22 23 40 2 3 124 45.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 11 5 0 0 0 0 16 100.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 35 25 9 4 0 0 73 82.2% Speech or Language Impaired 7 6 0 1 0 0 14 92.9% TOTALS 54 36 10 5 0 0 105 85.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 78 136 119 163 10 6 512 41. 8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 10 22 19 3 1 1 46 89 .1% 11 15 13 4 1 1 34 82.4% 12 3 2 5 100.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 94 151 71 99 5 11 431 56.8% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 51 30 14 9 1 66 39 77 .1% 11 27 11 11 1 38 12 76.0% 12 13 10 2 2 15 12 85.2% MATH 10 41 24 8 2 49 26 86. 7% 11 21 21 8 3 1 30 24 77.8% 12 6 13 2 3 1 8 17 76.0% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 47 30 11 2 1 59 32 84.6% 11 5 6 9 14 6 55.0% 12 13 4 3 3 16 7 73.9% SCIENCE 10 16 16 5 3 1 22 19 78.0% 11 15 14 7 1 22 15 78.4% 12 9 11 2 5 11 16 74 .1% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 20.0% Math 1 1 3 5 40.0% Science 2 2 3 7 28.6% Social Studies 1 1 2 .0% Foreign Language 5 1 6 .0% TOTAL 1 4 3 16 1 25 20.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 53 17 70 75.7% 4 4 .0% Drill Team 26 26 100.0% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 1 7 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Govt 4 14 6 3 2 1 30 60.0% 1 1 .0% TAILS 10 39 2 11 62 79.0% 2 1 3 6 33.3% FCS 1 5 14 45 65 9.2% 1 1 . 0% German Club 7 10 25 13 2 2 59 28.8% 1 1 .0% Young Democrats 3 11 11 39 1 4 69 20.3% 2 2 .0% French Club 5 17 20 32 2 1 77 28.6% 2 2 .0% CCE 5 13 8 1 27 66.7% 1 1 100.0% DECA 4 15 4 23 82.6% 1 1 100.0% FBLA 21 44 5 1 71 91. 5% 3 1 4 75.0% Accpt No Bound 10 22 22 47 6 8 115 27.8% 1 1 2 .0% Rotary Interact .0% 1 1 .0% Ladies Club .0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 41 1 42 97.6% 1 1 100.0% Troubadours 10 23 22 30 2 4 91 36.3% 3 1 3 7 42.9% Beta Club 5 27 50 108 8 9 207 15.5% 2 2 .0% Basketball 27 21 3 3 54 88.9% 2 2 100.0% Volleyball 7 13 20 35.0% 1 1 .0% Baseball .0% 2 2 100.0% Soccer .0% 1 1 .0% Golf .0% 1 1 .0% Tennis .0% 1 1 .0% Track .0% 1 1 .0% Madrigals 7 6 3 16 81. 3% 1 1 100.0% Nat.Honor.Soc. 2 14 21 42 4 4 87 18.4% 2 2 .0% Science Club 1 4 12 31 5 3 56 8.9% 1 1 2 .0% Latin Club 1 4 9 13 1 28 17.9% 1 1 .0% VICA 6 8 7 1 22 63.6% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ASO 8 5 2 15 86.7% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 232 342 251 454 33 38 1350 42.5% 8 13 12 24 1 58 36.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Supt. Honor 4 13 21 1 5 44 9 .1% A Honor Roll 1 9 36 64 7 10 127 7.9% B+ Honor 7 38 38 88 2 7 180 25.0% B Honor Roll 30 57 38 49 4 5 183 47.5% TOTAL 38 108 125 222 14 27 534 27.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT .0% .0% PTSA BOARD 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 6 50.0% GIFTED/TALENTED 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLDGS/GROUNDS HOSPITALITY LIBRARY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 1 WM 1 WF 3 12 5 OM 2 OF Total 6 14 6 % Black 33.3% 14.3% 16.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROJECT GRAD. SENIOR ACTIV. TEACHER APPREC. BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 6 3 6 WM WF 19 12 32 OM 3 OF Total % 25 15 38 Black 24.0% 20.0% 15.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SCHOOL SAFETY HEALTH/WELLNESS AR/DRUG FREE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 4 1 WM WF 3 3 5 OM 4 OF Total 4 7 6 % Black 25.0% 57 .1% 16. 7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BOOSTER CLUB PUBLIC RELATIONS TOTAL BM 2 BF WM WF 3 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 4 10 50.0% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 31 2 108 143 23.1% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 58 TESA 66 COOP. LEARNING 59 LEARN STYLES 3 VARIOUS OTHERS 8 TOTAL 194 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 38 CYCLE 1 9 CYCLE 2 7 CYCLE 3 7 VARIOUS COURSES 13 TOTAL 74 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 38 CLASSROOM MGMT. 61 ALT ASSESSMENT 18 CONFLICT MGMT. 35 VARIOUS COURSES 11 TOTAL 163 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Content Area TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 48 5 48 5 PAGE 1 ffiICXJI'    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 8 2 14 0 0 24 33.33 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 33.33 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 14 3 24 0 0 42 35.71 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.38 33.33 7 .14 57.14 00 00 42 35.71 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 1 0 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 7 0 4 0 2 13 53.85 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 60.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 12 0 3 30 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13. 33 36.67 00 40.00 00 10.00 30 50.00 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 25 3 36 6.94 34.72 4.17 50.00 0 .oo 3 4.17 72 72 41.67 41.67 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 23 16 6 6 3 5 59 66 .1% P4 11 7 10 6 1 1 36 50.0% SP 7 6 4 2 1 0 20 65.0% 01 26 25 10 8 4 2 75 68.0% 02 21 30 7 6 5 5 74 68.9% 03 25 26 8 6 6 1 72 70.8% 04 28 19 8 9 3 0 67 70.1% 05 24 23 5 7 2 1 62 75.8% 06 27 21 11 4 4 3 70 68.6% Total 192 173 69 54 29 18 535 68.2% 35.9% 32.3% 12.9% 10.1% 5.4% 3.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K ZINAMON B. 1 1 1 100.0% K KERR P. 1 8 4 2 2 1 3 20 60.0% K MURPH K. 1 8 6 2 2 1 1 20 70.0% K SABO D. 1 7 6 2 2 1 1 19 68.4% P4 BARRE F. 1 6 4 5 3 18 55.6% P4 MIMS S. 1 5 3 5 3 1 1 18 44.4% 01 DAVIS L. 1 9 9 3 2 1 1 25 72. 0% 01 ELLIS s. 1 7 9 4 4 1 25 64.0% 01 ZINAMON B. 1 1 l 100.0% 01 TEETER P. 1 10 7 3 2 2 1 25 68.0% 02 EANS s. 1 8 9 2 2 1 3 25 68.0% 02 NEAL L. 1 7 9 3 2 2 1 24 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 WELLS J. 1 6 12 2 2 2 1 25 72.0% 03 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 100. 0% 03 HOLLINGSWORTH J. 1 7 9 3 2 3 1 25 64.0% 03 ZINAMON 8. 1 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 03 ROSES. 1 9 9 3 2 2 25 72.0% 03 WILLIAMS F. 1 9 8 2 2 1 22 77.3% 04 BEDOW L. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 04 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 04 ISBELL P. 1 11 5 2 3 21 76.2% 04 SHANKS B. 1 10 5 2 3 3 23 65.2% 04 WILLIAMS E. 1 7 9 4 3 23 69.6% 05 BEDOW L. 1 1 1 100. 0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 BRYANT G. 1 7 9 1 3 20 80.0% 05 GALYEAN N. 1 9 6 1 1 2 1 20 75.0% 05 HARDESTY S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 05 JOHNSON J. 1 8 8 3 3 22 72. 7% 06 BEDOW L. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 06 CHILCOTE M. 1 8 10 4 1 23 78.3% 06 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 .0% 06 MALLETT O. 1 9 5 3 2 2 1 22 63.6% 06 PETTUS I. 1 10 6 4 2 1 2 25 64.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 33.3% Mentally Retarded 3 2 1 1 0 0 7 71. 4% Multihandicapped 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 50.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 9 6 3 1 0 28 64.3% Visually Handicapped 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% TOTALS  19 17 10 8 3 0 57 63.2% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 22 9 7 0 0 47 66.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 1 5 60.0% 01 1 1 2 2 1 7 28.6% 02 1 1 2 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Ambassadors 12 16 4 5 1 38 73.7% 1 l 2 50.0% Cafeteria Monit. 3 1 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council 6 14 5 1 26 76.9% 1 2 1 4 8 37.5% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% Fire Marshall 6 3 2 4 15 60.0% 1 1 .0% Quiz Bowl Team .0% .0% Peer Tutor's 4 8 2 6 1 21 57 .1% 1 1 2 50.0% Broadcast Team 2 2 2 1 1 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Cheerleaders 7 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 .0% Tchr of Tomorrow .0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 34 51 16 20 2 2 125 68.0% 1 7 1 10 1 20 40.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL 59 113 34 39 6 251 68.5% PERFECT ATTE 76 88 29 22 4 219 74.9% TOTAL 135 201 63 61 10 470 71.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 4 1 OM 4 1 OF Total % Black .0% 9 55.6% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Parent Recruit. BM BF 1 2 2 WM 1 WF 2 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 2 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 5 1 5 OM OF Total % Black 12 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 3 6 6 15 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. AUTISM WORKSHOP MATH TASK JOSTENS LG. ARTS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 4 7 10 1 10 5 24 13 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT ESL METHODS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 42 9 43 25 85 34 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 12 12 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SCH. IMPROVE. SCH. EMERGENCY 45 23 SCH. TESTING 23 1 COMPUTER TRAIN TOTAL 68 24 CLOVERDA1E POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 3 14 1 14 0 0 9.38 43.75 3.13 43.75 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 24 2 1 1 1 1 1 32 00 32 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 50.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 53.13 53.13 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 9 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 20.00 60.00 00 20.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 1 1 1 5 4 15 00 15 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 80.00 75.00 80.00 80.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 6 23 1 17 12.77 48.94 2.13 36.17 0 .oo 0 .oo 47 47 % BLACK 61.70 61.70 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 30 35 0 4 1 1 71 91. 5% P4 12 16 4 0 0 3 35 80.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 43 35 2 4 2 3 89 87.6% 02 32 38 3 1 0 1 75 93.3% 03 39 24 2 1 0 1 67 94.0% 04 25 35 1 2 0 0 63 95.2% 05 27 24 3 2 0 0 56 91.1% 06 21 31 1 0 1 0 54 96. 3% Total 229 238 16 14 4 9 510 91. 6% 44.9% 46.7% 3.1% 2. 7% .8% 1.8% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K EPPERSON B. 1 8 6 2 1 17 82.4% K HALLS. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% K MILLER G. 1 7 12 19 100.0% K ROLAX S. 1 8 8 2 18 88.9% P4 BUETTNER s. 1 9 6 1 2 18 83.3% P4 ROGERS C. 1 3 10 3 1 17 76.5% 01 COKELEY G. 1 12 6 1 1 1 1 22 81.8% 01 HENTHORNE M. 1 9 10 1 1 21 90.5% 01 SHUFFIELD K. 1 10 10 1 1 22 90.9% 01 SNOWDEN S. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 WALKERS. 1 11 8 2 1 22 86.4% 01 WINEK. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 SNOWDEN s. 1 12 11 1 24 95.8% 02 VANECKO A. 1 10 14 1 25 96.0% 02 VINSON W. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 WINEK. 1 10 12 2 1 25 88.0% 03 MCCLAIN M. 1 12 8 2 1 23 87.0% 03 TRIPCONY w. 1 12 6 1 19 94. 7% 03 WHITED. 1 15 10 25 100.0% 04 MURDOCK S. 1 10 10 1 2 23 87.0% 04 STUART D. 1 11 11 22 100.0% 04 VINSON w. 1 4 14 18 100.0% 05 BANKS B. 1 15 10 1 2 28 89.3% 05 WILSON S. 1 12 14 2 28 92.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 POSITION V. MILLS R. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 12 9 BF 14 17 WM WF 1 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 27 27 96.3% 96.3% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 7 1 1 0 0 16 87.5% TOTALS 10 10 3 1 0 0 24 83.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 11 19 0 1 0 0 31 96.8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 6 3 1 10 90.0% 01 3 3 1 7 85.7% 02 3 3 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 11 12 1 24 95.8% 2 1 3 66.7% AMBASSADORS 9 12 2 1 24 87.5% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 8 10 4 2 24 75.0% 1 1 2 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 10 11 1 1 1 24 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% STRAIGHT TALK 70 8 1 79 88.6% 3 3 100.0% POP TALK 72 3 2 77 93.5% 3 3 100.0% BASKET BALL 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 100. 0% GIFTED PROGRAM 11 18 4 1 34 85.3% 1 1 .0% M \u0026amp; M CLUB .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 129 135 22 8 2 3 299 88.3% 6 8 4 18 77.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD ALL A's ALL A's \u0026amp; B PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP MOST IMPROVE TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black SUNSHINE 1 5 6 16. 7% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 1 1 OF Total % 4 Black .0% 75.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black HOSPITALITY 1 3 2 6 66.7% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% DISCIPLINE 4 1 4 9 44.4% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STAFF DEVELOPMEN 1 1 3 5 40.0% .0% PARTNER IN EDUC 1 1 2 4 50.0% .0% POSITIVE ATTITUD 1 7 1 9 88.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GRANT WRITING PRIN ROUND TABLE TALENT SHOW BM BF 1 6 3 WM WF 1 2 5 1 OM OF Total % 2 12 5 Black .0% 50.0% 80.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% . 0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE COTILLION BCC CARNIVAL BM BF 1 4 4 1 WM WF 1 1 OM OF Total % Black 4 100.0% 6 2 83.3% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCIENCE FAIR SCHOOL PAPER BIRACIAL 1 2 1 2 2 Black .0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % Black 4 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 6 39 3 35 83 % Black 54.2% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 6 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black 63.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 16 TESA 7 RACE RELATIONS 26 HUMAN RELATIONS 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 14 TOTAL 74 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 7 6 3 3 19 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 1 15 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 1 ABACUS TRAINING 18 PARRNT INVOLVEME 1 TOTAL 20 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 6 2 14 0 0 4.35 26.09 8.70 60.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 12 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 23 00 23 % BLACK 00 33.33 00 00 00 00 25.00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1670","title":"Court filings concerning LRSD approval of revised desegregation and education plan and PCSSD petition for release from federal court supervision","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational planning","Educational law and legislation","School management and organization","School integration","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","School employees"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning LRSD approval of revised desegregation and education plan and PCSSD petition for release from federal court supervision"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1670"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["29 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to Little Rock School District (LRSD) motion for approval of revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, Joshua intervenors' request for a hearing to develop procedures for the consideration of the motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) for the approval of a revised plan; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) petition for release from federal court supervision; Court of Appeals, ruling; Court of Appeals, reply brief of Mrs. Lorene Joshua et al.; District Court, Knight intervenors' response to motion for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) reply to the Joshua intervenors' request for a hearing to develop procedures for the consideration of the motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) for the approval of a revised plan; District Court, two orders; District Court, motion for an extension of time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) petition for release from federal court supervision; District Court, three orders; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, Joshua intervenors' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan  This transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE U ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. O. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL . DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIVED OCT 8 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDA TS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO LRSD MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Knight Intervenors, et al., by and through their attorneys, ROACHELL LAW FIRM. for their Motion, state: 1. They were served with a copy of the Little Rock School District's Motion for Approval of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan on September 29, 1997. 2. Due to several of the leaders of the Knight, et al. Intervenors being out of town, there will be insufficient time to frame a response to its Motion. 3. Knight, et al., Intervenors should be granted an extension of ten (10) days in which to respond to the Motion. WHEREFORE, Knight, et al., Intervenors prays that it be granted an additional ten days or until October 19, 1997, to respond to the Motion for Approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and that they be granted all other relief to which they may be entitled Respectfully submitted, Richard W. Roachell Arkansas Bar No. 78132 ROACHELL LAW FIRM 401 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 504 The Lyon Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 375-5550 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Richard W. Roachell, do hereby certify and state that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid, on October 6, 1997 to the following persons: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Building. Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 2 Mr. Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 M. Samuel Jones ill WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JE::-.iNJNGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard W. Roache!! .,- ----- .. - 'RECEIVED FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT !:ASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS - OCT 9 1997 OCT 7 1997 OfflCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W. McCORMACK, Cl.ERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' REQUEST FOR A HEARING TO DEVELOP PROCEDURES FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION OF THE LRSD FOR THE APPROVAL OF A REVISED PLAN On November 30, 1995, the LRSD filed a motion for an order - dismissing this case retroactively. This court, which had by that time considerable knowledge about the quality of plan implementation efforts in the LRSD, denied the motion on March 11, 1996. This court reasoned in part (at 8): The LRSD has frequently exhibited indifference or outright recalcitrance towards its commitments (although some improvements have been made). Therefore, the Court finds that an order of dismissal should be deferred in order to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement. Even had the LRSD acted in good faith throughout the years, the logistics and complexity of this case are such that this Court's monitoring function would be impaired by entering an order of dismissal at this time. On September 26, 1997, the LRSD filed a brief motion and a short memorandum seeking \"approval of LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan.\" Despite the foregoing ruling, the memorandum, incorporated by reference in the motion (para. 1 - 10), asserts that \"LRSD has now substantially complied with its obligations under the plan for six years.\" AT 1. It also characterizes the new plan as one which \"leaves it to the district's professionals to determine the best means to fulfill each obligation.\" At 4. In brief, officials found to exhibit frequently \"indifference or outright recalcitrance toward (their] commitments\" asset that they are entitled to have the court approve a largely standardless plan. Put another way, LRSD asserts the right to have approved a plan under which a number of unidentified persons define the content of the district's obligations, as they go along. It is apparent that the motion of the LRSD presents - substantial questions, warranting careful consideration. The predicate for this view is not limited to the foregoing general observations about the past performance and the degree of discretion granted by the plan. First. LRSD cites the Supreme Court decision in Rufo v Inmates of Suffolk Co. Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (1992), concerning modification of a consent decree. That decision holds that a party seeking modification of a consent decree \"bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree.\" Id., at 383. It \"may meet it initial burden by showing a significant change either in factual conditions or in law.\" Id., at 384 . In considering factual matter, it is appropriate to evaluate whether a party \"made a 2 reasonable effort to comply with the decree .... \" Id., at 385. Second. Once a party has met its burden of showing a factual or legal matter warranting modification, the court \"should determine whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstances.\" Id., at 391. This can not be said is there is simply an effort \"to rewrite a consent decree so that is conforms to the constitutional floor.\" Id. Third. The Court of Appeals applied Rufo in this case to a proposal concerning the closing of Ish Incentive School. LRSD v PCSSD, 56 F3d 904, 912-15 (8th Cir. 1995). In approving that proposal, the court emphasized with regard to the replacement school for Ish students, \"King will be integrated.\" Id., at 914. In the light of the foregoing factors, including the - standards governing in the case of a request for modification of a consent decree, the Joshua Intervenors seek a hearing to discuss at least the following factors. (1.) An opportunity for intervenors to conduct discovery. The LRSD relies to a considerable extent on assertion. The plan refers to policies (unspecified) in many areas. The meaning of the educational component of the plan is not self-evident. The quality of implementation efforts is relevant under Rufo. The impact of the student assignment proposals on desegregation is significant in view of the appellate ruling in this case cited above. (2.) The need for a report or reports by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the nature and the quality of 3 LRSD implementation in key areas. The LRSD seeks to dilute its obligation to address achievement disparity, as wells racial disparity in other areas. Compare the initial portion of the Interdistrict Plan to the new plan. It is appropriate to request ODM to determine whether the LRSD made an organized effort to eliminate the achievement disparity and other racial disparities to the extent possible, before changing the plan. Rufo addresses the quality of implementation efforts, and cautions against efforts to move to the \"constitutional floor: -- from the provisions to which a party voluntarily agreed. (3.) The possibility of a delay in the consideration of the motion until the court of appeals reviews the denial of a fee award to intervenors' counsel. The parties should be on equal - footing when addressing such fundamental changes in the plans. That is not the case now. (4.) A time period for the intervenors to respond to the motion, whatever the court's reaction to these issues. District court decisions cited by the LRSD do not warrant the relief sought by the District. In the Denver litigation, the court found in 1987 that \"the defendants have made a sincere and strenuous effort to meet the requirements of the October 1985 Order.'' Keyes v School District No. 1, 653 F. Supp. 1536, 1540 (D. Colo. 1987); see also Keyes, 902 F. Supp. 1274, 1286 (D. Colo. 1995) (\"The District has complied in good faith with the Interim Decree entered by this Court in 1987.\"). The court in the Dallas case voted significant improvement in the district's 4 implementation efforts over time. Tasby v. Woolery, 869 F. Supp. 454, 457, 460, 477 (N.D. Tex. 1994). This case does not present a parallel situation. Here, the court has found implementation to be deficient. E.g., Order of March 11, 1996, at 8-9. (5.) The district's request that ODM monitoring continue to be restrained. In intervenor's view, as noted, ODM monitoring should focus on key elements of the current plan and that the ODM monitoring role should be consisitent with the one which the Court of Appeals established. (6.) The actions, advice and recommendations provided by the court or through the ODM to the school district which actions. advice and recommendations have not been otherwise shared with the intervenors. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully move the court to set a hearing for the purpose of developing procedures for the consideration of the motion of the LRSD for the approval of the revised plan. The Intervenors further respectfully request that ODM monitoring be resumed and continued in the interim and in the manner contemplated and directed by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. With respect this requested relief, Joshua also respectfully requests that the court and the ODM disclose any and all information, assistance, advice and counsel which, it or anyone associated with the court, have provided to the Little Rock School District or any of its employees, board members or agents during the past year, during 5 - the time when monitoring was abated. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing pleading was s~ry~ via United States mail to all counsel of record on this ~ day of October, 1997. 6  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF ., V . NO . LR - C - 8 2 - 8 6.it. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL NECEn,m DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. DCi 14 1997 INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT I ET AL. OFFICE OF INTERVENORS DESEGREGATION MONITOR/NG PCSSD PETITION FOR RELEASE FROM FEDERAL COURT SUPERVISION INTRODUCTION The PCSSD believes that it has earned unitary status. It asks this Court co examine the record that has been made, to hold a hearing on those issues, if any, which might be legitimately in controversy, and to ultimately enter its decree declaring that the PCSSD has earned unitary status and release it from further court supervision. In this peticion, the PCSSD will briefly revisit the background of this case, will set forth the controlling law, will examine the determinations of other courts from around the country which have declared other districts to be unitary, and will then apply the facts of this case to the controlling legal principles. BACKGROUND This action was filed on November 30, 1982 by the LRSD against the PCSSD and others. 1 Liability was adjudicated against the PCSSD and others on April 10, 1984 and a consolidation of the three school districts in Pulaski County was ordered. Upon appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (hereafter the Court of Appeals), en bane, affirmed mos~ of the findings of liability of the district court, but reversed the court ordered consolidation and prescribed a different remedy. The Court of Appeals ordered that the boundaries of the LRSD would become those of the city of Little Rock as they then existed. ~he Court of Appeals also ordered the transfer of the Granite Moun~ain community from the LRSD to the PCSSD. As a result of these transfers, the PCSSD lost 36% of its tax base, one-third of its schools, and 25% of its students. In the same opinion, the Court of Appeals ordered all three districts t o develop desegregation plans that would distribute students in a way such that each school would have approximately the same racial balance as each district had as a whole. Significantly, the Court of Appeals specifically held that the remedy it then ordered was a comolete remedy for the constitutional violations of which the PCSSD had been found guilty; specifically those violations relating to annexations and deannexatior.s, segregated housing, school siting, student 1The LRSD supports the PCSSD in its petition for unitary status. assignments, special education, transportation, employment of faculty and administrators, and black participation in school affairs. Thereafter, o~her proceedings occurred, both before the district court and the Court of Appeals, culminating in 1989 in the Settlement Agreement and the agreed upon Desegregation Plan for each school district. While the present PCSSD Plan was not =inalized in all of its particulars until April, 1992, the PCSSD has operated since 1989 under substantially the same plan. Thus, the PCSSD will highlight for the Court its efforts and activities since 1989 which it believes warrant a finding of unitary status. THE APPLICABLE LAW In 1992, the United States Supreme Court discussed the issue of unitary status ~n Freeman v. Pitts, 112 S.Ct. 1430 (1992), explaining that: [A)s we explained last term in Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. , , 111 S.Ct. 630, 636, 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991), the term \"unitary\" is not a precise concept: \"[I)t is a mistake to treat words such as 'dual' and 'unitary' as if they were actually found in the Constitution .... Courts have used the term 'dual' to denote a school system which has engaged in intentional segregation of students by race, and 'unitary' to describe a school system which has been brought into compliance with the command of the Constitution. We are not sure how useful it is to define these terms more precisely, or to create subclasses within them.\" It follows that we must be cautious not to attribute to the term a utility it does not have. The term \"unitary\" does not confine the discretion and authority 3 of the District Court in a way that departs from traditional equitable principles. 112 S.Ct. at 1443-44. The Freeman court further explained that: [l] Proper resolution of any desegregation case turns on a careful assessment of its facts. Green, supra, at 439, 88 S.Ct., at 1694. Here, as in most cases where the issue is the degree of compliance with a school desegregation decree, a critical beginning point is the degree of racial imbalance in the school district, that is to say a comparison of the proportion of majority to minority students in individual schools with the proportions of the races in the district as a whole. This inquiry is fundamental, for under the former de jure regimes racial exclusion was both the means and the end of a policy motivated by disparagement of or hostility towards the disfavored race. In accord with this principle, the District Court began its analysis with an assessment of the current racial mix in the schools throughout DCSS and the explanation for the racial imbalance it found. 112 S.Ct. at 1437. The PCSSD will comply with this requirement, as did the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1996 in the Wilmington case when it af:irmed the district court's declaration of unitary scatus in Coalition to Save Our Children v. State Board of Education of the State of Delaware, et al., 90 F.3d 752 (3rd Cir. 1996) : A critical starting point in identifying vestiges of discrimination is the degree of racial imbalance in the school districts. This inquiry is fundamental, because under the former de jure regime, a racial exclusion was both the means and the end of a policy motivated by disparagement of, and hostility towards, the disfavored race. The Court's 1968 opinion in Green squarely addressed this issue, noting that \"[t]he pattern of separate 'white' and 'Negro' schools ... established under compulsion of state laws is precisely the pattern of segregation to which Brown I and Brown II were particularly addressed.\" Green, 391 U.S. at 435, 88 S.Ct. at 1693. However, the Green Court also made clear that in examining the problem of racial imbalance in 4 our schools, we are to look \"not just to the composition of student bodies ... but to every facet of school operations - - faculty, staff, transportation, extracurricular activities and facilities.\" Id.; see also Swann, 402 U.S. at 18, 91 S.Ct. at 1277 (the Green factors are \"among the most important indicia of segregated system.\") Because compliance with Green factors is a condition precedent to unitary status, we will survey each of those factors here. 90 F.3d at 760. The PCSSD will likewise assess the Green factors especially as each of them is addressed in its Desegregation Plan. The Wilminoton Court also commented upon federal court supervision in general. Addressing the Supreme Court's decision in Jenkins, the Wilminoton Court noted: Given the Court's recent assertion that federal supervision of local school districts \"'was intended as a temporary measure to remedy past discrimination,\"' Jenkins, U.S. , 115 S.Ct. at 2049 (quoting Dowell, 498 U.S. at:247, 111 S.C~. at 637), we underscore that the phrase \"to the extent praccicable\" implies a reasonable limit on the duration of that federal supervision. Indeed, to extend federal court supervision indefinitely is neither practicable, desirable, nor proper. 90 F.3d at 760. The Wilmington Court further explained that: This equitable remedy and, by definition, its jurisprudential legitimacy, were meant to have a limited lifespan. The remedy was designed to serve only as an implement for monitoring and guidance, not as a permanent substitute for state and local school boards, or [**84] indeed, for the state legislature. Thus in our zeal to insure maximum educational opportunities for all Delaware school students, the federal courts must bear in mind that the responsibility for administering the schools ultimately belongs to locally elected officials. Indeed, we must acknowledge that although it has been proper for us to supervise multiple generations of students in the service of unassailable ideals, in the process we have also denied multiple generations of elected officials the freedom to participate fully in representative government. 90 F.3d at 779 5 Additional legal principles and teachings from other cases will be set forth as appropriate infra as particular topics are addressed. THE LAW OF THIS CASE The Court of Appeals, in its 1990 decision, reaffirmed the 1985 en bane court's decision that the previously mandated territorial exchanges were the remedy for all of the interdistrict violations. It explained that: We also held, however, agreeing in this respect with the District Court, that interdistrict violations of the Constitution had occurred, and that an interdistrict remedy was accordingly required. We directed the District Court, on remand, to adjust the boundary between LRSD and PCSSD in two respects: (1 ) by transferring the Granite Mountain area from LRSD to PCSSD; and (2) by expanding LRSD so that the new boundary line becween it and PCSSD would be the city limits of the City of Little Rock, as they then existed. We further held--addressing the question of student attendance within each of the districts--that \"each school district as reconstituted shall be required to revise its attendance zones so that each school will reasonably reflect the racial composition of its district.\" Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, supra, 778 F.2d at 435. Our opinion included a number of other directions with respect to magnet schools, student-attendance arrangements, and other matters. The District Court held that LRSD would automatically expand whenever the city annexed new territory, so that LRSD would always be contiguous with the city as it existed from time to time. We reversed. We held that the remedy contemplated by our en bane opinion was intended to be a complete cure for all interdistrict violations that we had found. The en bane opinion, we said, prescribed \"a full and sufficient correction of wrongs done in the past,\" including all interdistrict violations. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 805 F.2d 815, 816 (8th Circ. 1986) (per curiam) . Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371, 1377 (8th Cir. 1990) 6 It is significant to note that many features of the PCSSD Plan, the Interdistrict Plan, and the Plans of the other school districts were not specifically mandated as remedial devices by the Court of Appeals. For instance, the six interdistrict schools, while subsequently embraced by the Court of Appeals, were never mandated as part of any prescribed remedy. For that matter, the Court of Appeals never specifically mandated that the PCSSD pursue affirmative action in hiring and in staffing its schools and other operations. Indeed, it held in 1985 that the territorial transfer was the remedy for, among other things, violations in the areas of special education, transportation, and employment of faculty and administrators. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Soecial School District, 778 F.2d 404, 434-435 (8th Cir. 1985 ) . To be sure, these topics and others are prominently featured in the Plan. Some are among the Green factors to be discussed later. However, because they were not specifically mandated as part of any remedy, issues arise such as burden of proof as to compliance and will be discussed fully infra. were 1985. THE GREEN FACTORS I. RACIAL BALANCE AND STUDENT ASSIGNMENT The guidelines for racial balance in all three districts initially addressed and laid down by the en bane Court in It explained then that: In constructing a desegregation remedy, a court may not rigidly require a particular racial balance. Pasadena Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 436-38, 96 S.Ct. 2697, 2704-06, 49 L.Ed.2d 599 ((1976); 7 Milliken I, 418 U.S. at 739-40, 94 S.Ct. at 3124-25; Swann, 402 U.S. at 22-25, 91 S.Ct. at 1279-81. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the awareness of the racial composition of a school district or school districts is a useful starting point in developing an effective remedy, and thus the limited use of racial ratios is within the Court's equitable discretion. Swann, 402 U.S. at 25, 91 S.Ct. at 1280. Thus, the Supreme Court has approved a remedy imposed by the district court requiring that all schools in the school district be roughly within the same racial balance. Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449, 455 n. 3, 99 S.Ct. 2941, 2945 n. 3, 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979); Swann, 402 U.S. at 23-25, 91 S.Ct. at 1279-80. Our Court has consequently approved the use of flexible ratios in desegregation remedies on numerous occasions ... In any event, in this case, we have closely tailored the remedy to the violations and we are not requiring a particular racial balance in each district (Citations omitted.) LRSD v. PCSSD, 778 F.2d at 433. The en bane Court then articulated the guideline applicable in this case: 4. After the boundaries between LRSD and PCSSD have been adjusted, each school district as reconstituted shall be required to revise its attendance zones so that each school will reasonably reflect the racial composition of its district. Consistent with earlier district court orders with respect to these schools, school districts may, where necessary, be permitted to depart from this remedial guideline in that school enrollments may over- or underrepresent blacks or whites by as much as one-fourth of the remedial guideline for either race. We see no reason why, on this record, the variance should exceed this level. [Emphasis added.] 778 F.2d at 435. Ultimately, of course, the current PCSSD Plan was examined by the Court of Appeals which approved the student assignment goals agreed to by all of the parties. The Court of Appeals 8 explicitly approved the student assignment goals of the PCSSD and the other parties interpreting them as follows: So far as racial ratios were concerned, the Plan included the following goals: 13. With the exception of Bayou Meto, the goal of the plan shall be to achieve a minimum black student enrollment of 20% by the end of six years in all PCSSD schools .... 14. With the exception of Bayou Meto, it is hoped that the dynamics of the plan will result, by the end of the implementation period, in all PCSSD schools being within the range of plus or minus 25% of the then prevailing district-wide average of blacks by organizational level. However, at a minimum, at the end of the implementation period, no PCSSD school shall have a black enrollment which exceeds the then prevailing black ratio, by organizational level, in the Little Rock School District. LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d at 1378-79. - As will be explained further, the PCSSD believes it has satisfied, for a period of years, the racial balance and student assignment components of its Plan. Before specifically examining the racial balance outcomes in the PCSSD, it is useful to examine the racial balance outcomes that pertain in Freeman v. Pitts, in which a declaration of unitary status was affirmed even upon facts dramatically different than the outcomes found in the PCSSD. As the Supreme Court explained in Freeman: Racial balance is not to be achieved for its own sake. It is to be pursued when racial imbalance has been caused by a constitutional violation. Once the racial imbalance due to the de jure violation has been remedied, the school district is under no duty to remedy imbalance that is caused by demographic factors. Swann, 402 U.S., at 31-32, 91 S.Ct., at 1283-84 9 (\"Neither school authorities nor district courts are constitutionally required to make year-by-year adjustments of the racial composition of student bodies once the affirmative duty to desegregate has been accomplished and racial discrimination through official action is eliminated from the system. This does not mean that federal courts are without power to deal with future problems; but in the absence of a showing that either the school authorities or some other agency of the State has deliberately attempted to fix or alter demographic patterns to affect the racial composition of the schools, further intervention by a district court should not be necessary\"). If the unlawful de jure policy of a school system has been the cause of the racial imbalance in student attendance, that condition must be remedied. The school district bears the burden of showing that any current imbalance is not traceable, in a proximate way, to the prior violation. 112 S.Ct. at 1447. It is instructive to set forth the outcomes of the DeKalb County schools as summarized by the United States Supreme Court. Concerned with racial imbalance in the various schools of the district, respondents presented evidence that during che 1986-1987 school year DCSS had the following features: (1) 47% of the students attending DCSS were black; (2) 50% of the black students attended schools that were over 90% black; (3) 62% of all black students attended schools that had more than 20% more blacks than the systemwide average; (4) 27% of white students attended schools that were more than 90% white; (5) 59% of the white students attended schools that had more than 20% more whites than the systemwide average; (6) of the 22 DCSS high schools, five had student populations that were more than 90% black, while five other schools had student populations that were more than 80% white; and (7) of the 74 elementary schools in DCSS, 18 are over 90% black, while 10 are over 90% white. Id., at 31a. 112 s.ct. ac 1438. Despite these statistical outcomes, the United States Supreme Courc found that the system was unitary with respect to student assignment and racial balance. As we will examine below, the track record of the PCSSD is far superior to that of the 10 schools in DeKalb County, Georgia, is in compliance with any and all tests which may be reasonably applied, and that the PCSSD has demonstrated its entitlement to unitary status. THE PCSSD OUTCOMES District-wide, the racial composition of the PCSSD since 1989 has been as follows: I I 89-90 I I Total I 21,607 I I % Black I 26 I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT EIGHT YEAR ENROLLMENT COMPARISON 90-91 I 91-92 I 92-93 I 93-94 I 94.95 21,597 I 21,062 I 21,633 I 20,426 I 20,417 26 I 27 I 28 I 30 I 31 I 95-96 I 96-97 I 20,534 I 20,295 I 32 I 33 Since 1989, the composition of the District's elementary schools has been as follows: School Adkins Elem Total % Black Arnold Drive Elem Total % Black Baker Elem Total % Black Bates Elem Total % Black Bayou Meto Elem Total % Black Cato Elem Total % Black Clinton Elem Total % Black College Station Elem Total % Black Crystal Hill Elem Total % Black PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT EIGHT YEAR ENROLLMENT COMPARISON' 89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93.94 371 360 352 420 411 40 36 39 36 37 387 411 408 390 348 18 16 14 18 23 294 291 268 283 294 27 30 25 27 25 698 638 737 680 599 47 46 47 45 45 602 596 611 648 649 2 2 2 1 1 656 655 663 650 569 21 24 21 21 22 242 279 310 326 277 40 38 34 33 40 776 746 40 43 94.95 95-96 96-97 397 343 312 39 36 38 375 380 381 25 24 22 304 318 318 24 27 24 550 485 464 53 56 54 639 635 628 1 2 3 523 552 542 23 22 22 661 661 739 49 50 47 316 309 323 43 41 41 791 790 778 45 46 46 21995-1996 School Racial Balance Monitoring Report: LRSD PCSSD Dated January 30, 1996, by Office of Desegregation Monitoring, Docket No. 2614 11 I I I School 89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 Dupree Elem Total 470 414 431 458 428 435 462 438 % Black 20 21 24 23 22 22 26 26 Fuller Elem Total 587 560 529 524 473 431 381 375 % Black 57 56 58 57 63 58 57 59 Harris Elem Total 633 616 605 546 479 331 325 303 % Black 31 32 34 40 47 44 50 53 Jacksonville Elem Total 796 817 844 847 763 759 752 731 % Black 32 28 27 27 31 37 41 42 Landmark Elem Total 563 566 522 518 498 499 484 504 % Black 47 46 44 46 46 43 41 43 Lawson Elem Total 334 345 331 321 304 305 308 294 % Black 19 15 16 14 16 23 19 16 Oak Grove Elem Total 572 573 515 469 438 435 451 421 % Black 12 14 13 24 24 22 23 24 Oakbrooke Elem Total 678 659 629 592 600 449 455 453 % Black 25 21 18 18 21 22 23 24 Pine Forrest Elem Total 625 677 658 518 434 455 498 456 % Black 14 14 15 20 21 19 20 21 Pinewood Elem Total 614 619 631 619 580 549 579 543 % Black 27 27 27 30 31 29 31 35 Robinson Elem Total 450 433 443 420 411 388 387 382 % Black 22 22 23 25 24 22 25 21 Scott Elem Total 203 207 205 191 147 158 136 127 % Black 37 34 34 35 34 32 36 35 Sherwood Elem Total 518 448 443 490 450 459 463 416 % Black 24 24 26 24 26 24 27 25 Sylvan Hills Elem Total 755 802 755 735 685 424 444 422 % Black 18 16 17 18 23 21 25 24 Taylor Elem Total 455 468 423 420 388 409 420 397 % Black 24 28 26 26 "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1671","title":"Court filings: District Court, motion for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-09-26"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education--Standards","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School board members","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, motion for approval of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) revised desegregation and education plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1671"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["43 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"This transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL OFFiCE OF DESEGREGATiOiu t,10.'JITORINJ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS LRSD'S REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD\") states: 1. This court has expressed the view that modifications of LRSD' s Desegregation Plan might be appropriate. The court has properly recognized that the parties themselves must develop and present any proposed modifications, but has provided expert testimony concerning potential areas for modification. The court further assisted the plan modification process by providing LRSD a period of time during which the district could  concentrate its efforts on developing plan modifications to improve education and desegregation within the district. Order, December 27, 1996. LRSD has prepared a modified plan for the purpose of providing improved education and desegregation. LRSD' s Revised Desegregation and :Education Plan is attached as Exhibit A to this motion. 2. LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan was developed in accordance with the plan amendment process. All of the parties to this case received early drafts of the plan and had the opportunity to make suggestions concerning the plan. LRSD amended the plan in response to suggestions made by various parties. In addition, the Joshua Intervenors were specifically asked whether they bad any ideas for improving the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Joshua did not make any suggestions for plan modifications. Although much of the contact soliciting responses from other parties was made by telephone, the correspondence which reflects the distribution of LRSD' s Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and our solicitation of responses from the other parties is attached as Exhibit B to this motion. 3. On September 18, 1997 the LRSD Board of Directors voted unanimously to adopt the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and to present it to the district court for approval. The comments of the board members, attached as Exhibit C, show that they gave serious consideration to the plan and that they understand the important commitment they have made to work for the success of the plan if it is approved by the district court. Representatives of the Little Rock Chamber of Commerce and the Little Rock Alliance for Our Public Schools expressed to the board their strong support for the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 4. The United States Supreme Court has emphasized in the recent cases of Freeman v. Pitts and Missouri y. Jenkins that the district court's end purpose in a desegregation case is not only to remedy the violation to the extent practicable, but also to restore state and local authorities to control of a school system that is operating in compliance with the Constitution. The Revised Desegregation and Education Plan provides a means by which this court can 2 accomplish both the maximum practicable desegregation within LRSD and the restoration of local control to the LRSD Board of Directors and the citizens of Little Rock. 5. LRSD's current desegregation plan was designed to operate for a period of six years. It is too detailed, too complex and too rigid to provide LRSD the greatest possibility for long term desegregation. The primary architects of the old plan are no longer with the district. The Revised Desegregation and Education Plan retains the core desegregation commitments found in the old plan, but is premised on the belief that a solid education program provides the best foundation for long term desegregation. 6. The new plan also provides the flexibility necessary for LRSD to adapt to changing educational and demographic conditions. LRSD has more freedom under the new plan to adjust the means by which it seeks to reach its desegregation and education goals without unnecessary court involvemenL Under the present plan, every detail concerning implementation of the plan is a part of the plan itself and cannot be changed without involving the court. 7. This court previously found that LRSD would benefit from a temporary hiatus from monitoring in order to develop proposed modifications to the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Order, December 27, 1996. LRSD asks the court to continue the temporary hiatus from monitoring during the court's consideration of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 8. As part of the effort to allow the parties to focus on the development of modifications to the LRSD Desegregation Plan, LRSD withdrew its motion for reconsideration of this court's ruling on LRSD's Motion to End Federal Court Jurisdiction. The court granted LRSD a period of time to and including September 30, 1997 within which to refile its motion 3 for reconsideration. LRSD asks that that deadline be extended until a reasonable time following this court's final determination with respect to the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 9. This Motion For Approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation And Education Plan should not be construed as a waiver of the positions expressed in the Motion to E.nd Federal Court Jurisdiction. 10. LRSD's memorandum brief in support of this motion is hereby incorporated by reference. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the accompanying brief, LRSD moves for an order approving its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and, during the pendency of this motion, extending this court's December 27, 1997 Order with respect to monitoring and with respect to LRSD's right to refile its motion to reconsider the court's ruling on LRSD's Motion to End Federal Court Jurisdiction. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Christopher Heller John C. Fendley, Ir. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By:~(?_-~~ ~C. Fendley, Jr. ' Bar No. 92182 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion For Approval of LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 26th day of September, 1997. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 ~e.~fJ C.F~ 5 I. Little Rock School District Revised Desegregation and Education Plan September 18, 1997 Prior A~reements and Orders. This Revised Desegregation and Education Plan shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in Lillie Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") with the following exceptions: A. The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement as revised on September 28, 1989 (\"Settlement Agreement\"); B. The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; C. Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; D. The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; and, E. Orders of the district court and court of appeals interpreting or enforcing paragraphs A. through D. above to the extent not inconsistent with this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. II. Obligations. A. LRSD shall use its expertise and resources to comply with the Constitution and provide an equal educational opportunity for all students attending LRSD schools and to ensu_re that no person is discriminated against on the basis of race, color or ethnicity in the operation of LRSD; B. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures, including but not limited to recruitment practices and reasonable measures to maintain a pool of qualified AfricanAmerican applicants, designed to ensure that LRSD hires qualified African-Americans in EXHIBIT A proportion to their percentage in the relevant labor market; C. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures, including but not limited to reasonable measures to maintain a pool of qualified African-American candidates, designed to ensure that LRSD promotes qualified African-Americans in proportion to their percentage of the pool of candidates eligible for promotion; D. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that to the extent practicable the percentage of African-American certified personnel in each LRSD school is within plus or minus fifteen percentage points from the percentage of AfricanAmerican certified personnel in the district as a whole; E. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure to the extent practicable that the certified personnel at one race, African-American schools (2. 90% African-American) is comparable with the certified personnel at other LRSD schools with regard to years of teaching experience and number of teachers with advanced degrees; F. LRSD shall implement student assignment programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure the desegregation of LRSD schools to the extent practicable; G. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination in the referral and placement of students in special education; H. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination with regard to student discipline; I. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to promote participation and to ensure that there are no barriers to participation by qualified African- 2 Americans in extracurricular activities, advanced placement courses and the gifted and talented program; J. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to improve the academic achievement of African-American students, including but not limited to Section V. of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan; K. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to promote and encourage parental and community involvement and support in the operation of LRSD and the education of LRSD students; L. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure an equitable allocation of financial, technological and educational resources to LRSD schools; M. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure equitable maintenance and repair of LRSD facilities; N. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that there is no racial discrimination in the provision of guidance and counseling services; 0. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure that every LRSD school provides its students a learning environment free from discrimination; and, P. LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure LRSD substantially complies with its obligations under this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. III. Student Assignments. A. Attendance Zones. Before the 1998-99 school year, LRSD attendance zones shall 3 be redrawn in accordance with the following guidelines: 1. Neighborhood Schools. LRSD shall assign students to area1 elementary and junior high/middle schools based on reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zones drawn to create as many truly desegregated schools (from forty to sixty percent AfricanAmerican) as reasonably practicable, except as provided in subparagraph 2. below; 2. Exception. Where a reasonably compact and contiguous attendance zone will result in an elementary or junior high/middle school which is less than twenty percent African-American, LRSD reserves the right to either: a. Draw the attendance zone at less than full capacity to allow for the voluntary transfer of African-American students to the school; or, b. Create one or more satellite attendance zones of primarily African- American students. 3. High Schools. LRSD shall assign students to area high schools based on attendance zones drawn so that the percentage of African-American students at each high school shall be within plus or minus twenty percentage points from the percentage of African-American students for high schools as a whole and so that, to the extent practicable, a stable and predictable feeder pattern exists from LRSD junior high/middle schools. B. Voluntar:y Student Transfers. Beginning in the 1998-99 school year, the following guidelines shall govern voluntary student transfers: 1. Desegregation Transfers. LRSD students whose race constitutes more than 1The term \"area\" school shall refer to all LRSD schools except magnet and interdistrict schools. 4 sixty percent of the population at their attendance zone school shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school where their race constitutes less than forty percent of the student population subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 2. Racial Isolation Transfer. LRSD students whose attendance zone school is a one race, African-American school (2.. 90% African-American) shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 3. Magnet Program Transfer. LRSD students shall be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school to participate in a designated magnet program subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 4. Employees' Child Transfer. LRSD employees who reside in the LRSD may choose to have their children attend the same school or campus at which the employee works, not including Magnet schools, subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 5. Special Circumstances Transfer. Upon a showing of a special need arising out of circumstances unique to a particular student, a student may, at the sole discretion of LRSD, be permitted to transfer to another LRSD area school subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; 6. Outside Students. LRSD schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will improve the racial balance of the district as a whole and of the school to which the student wishes to transfer and subject to capacity limitations and to reasonable requirements established by LRSD; and, 5 7. Transportation. LRSD shall provide transportation to voluntary transfer students with the following exceptions: (i) employee's child transfers, (ii) special circumstances transfers, and (iii) transfers from outside Pulaski County. C. Magnet Programs. The designated magnet programs at this time are the following: 1. Rockefeller Early Childhood Program; 2. King High Intensity Learning Program; 3. Washington Math Science Program; 4. Henderson Health Science Program; 5. Dunbar International Studies/Gifted and Talented Program; 6. Central International Studies Program; and, 7. McClellan Business Communications Program. LRSD reserves the right to modify or discontinue designated magnet programs and to establish new magnet programs. D. Middle Schools. LRSD shall establish a schedule for the orderly conversion of some or all of its junior high schools to middle schools for grades six, seven and eight and move the ninth grade to high schools. As a part of this conversion, LRSD reserves the right to change the grade level structure at all of its schools, including magnet schools. E. School Construction/Closing. LRSD shall construct two new area elementary schools, one in west Little Rock and one at the site of the former Stephens school. When the new Stephens Elementary opens, Garland Elementary School shall be closed. F. Modification Standard; During the term of this Revised Desegregation and 6 Education Plan, LRSD shall not recommend additional modifications to attendance zones or grade level structure or the construction, enlargement or closing of any additional schools unless: 1. Such action would further the goal of desegregating LRSD or eliminating the vestiges of past discrimination to the extent practicable; or, 2. The LRSD Board of Directors determines (i) that the educational benefits expected from such action substantially outweigh any adverse effects of the proposed action, (ii) that no practical alternative to the proposed action exists which will accomplish the educational objective, and (iii) that to the extent practicable measures will be initiated to counteract any adverse affects of the proposed action. G. Racial Balance. This Revised Desegregation and Education Plan recognizes that the desegregation of LRSD to the extent practicable does not require that every LRSD school be racially balanced. Accordingly, nothing in this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan shall be construed as requiring a particular racial balance at every LRSD school or as obligating LRSD to recruit students to obtain a particular racial balance in every LRSD school. IV. lnterdistrict Schools. LRSD and the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") shall operate Interdistrict Schools in accordance with the following: A. PCSSD lnterdistrict Schools. PCSSD shall operate Baker Elementary, Clinton Elementary, Crystal Hill Elementary and any new elementary school constructed in Chenal Valley as Interdistrict Schools; B. LRSD lnterdistrict Schools. LRSD shall operate King Elementary, Romine Elementary and Washington Elementary as lnterdistrict Schools; 7 C. Racial Composition. The ideal composition at interdistrict schools shall be as close to 50%-50% as possible with the majority race of the host district remaining the majority race at the Interdistrict School; D. Reserved Seats. PCSSD shall reserve at least 200 seats at Clinton Elementary and up to 399 seats at Crystal Hill Elementary for interdistrict transfer students from LRSD; E. Recruitment. LRSD and PCSSD agree to implement programs at Interdistrict Schools designed to attract interdistrict transfers and to work cooperatively to recruit interdistrict transfers to Interdistrict Schools; F. Outside Students. Interdistrict Schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will assist the Interdistrict School in achieving its ideal racial composition; and, G. Transportation. Transportation shall be provided by the home district for interdistrict transfers from Pulaski County to Interdistrict Schools. V. Student Achievement. A. Early Childhood Education. LRSD shall implement an early childhood education program which shall include a HIPPY program and a four year-old program with no less than 720 seats. B. Reading/Language Arts. 1. Primary Grades. LRSD shall implement the following strategies to improve academic achievement of students in kindergarten through the third grade: a. Establish as a goal that by the completion of the third grade all students will be reading independently to make accurate meaning out of words on a page; 8 b. Focus teaching efforts on reading/language arts instruction by teaching science and social studies content through reading/language arts and mathematics experiences; c Promote thematic instruction; d. Identify clear objectives for student mastery of all three reading cueing systems (phonics, semantics and syntax) and of knowing-how-to-learn skills; e. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; f. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts and mathematics instruction; g. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; h. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement; 1. Provide pre-kindergarten, kindergarten and first grade learning readiness experiences for students who come to school without such experiences; J. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all students in diverse, mainstreamed classrooms; and, k. Use the third and/or fourth grade as a transition year from focused reading/language arts and mathematics instruction to a more traditional school day. 2. Intermediate Grades. LRSD intends to implement the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in grades four and six: a. Adopt as a goal that by completion of the sixth grade all students 9 will master and use daily higher level reading comprehension skills for learning in all subject areas, for making meaning in real life experiences and for personal growth and enjoyment; b. Promote thematic instruction; c. Establish uninterrupted blocks of time for reading/language arts, mathematics, science and social studies instruction; d. Monitor the appropriateness of teaching/learning materials to achieving curricular objectives and the availability of such materials in all classrooms; e. Monitor student performance using appropriate assessment devices; f. Provide parents/guardians with better information about their child's academic achievement; and, g. Train teachers to manage successful learning for all students in diverse, mainstreamed classroom. 3. Secondary Schools. LRSD intends to implement the following strategies to improve the academic achievement of students in grades six2 through twelve: a. Adopt as a goal that upon graduation all students will read independently to make meaning in all subjects areas every day as necessary to be successful workers, citizens and life-long learners: b. Establish specific reading comprehension learning objectives for the language arts, mathematics, science and social studies curricula; c. Revise the language arts curriculum to include greater emphasis on 2LRSD recognizes that the sixth grade was previously included as an intermediate grade. The sixth grade is also included here since it will be a transition year into middle school. 10 reading for meaning and on expressing comprehension of reading through writing and speaking; d. Expand the use of a second Language Arts class at all secondary grade levels and establish procedures for identifying eligible students and, where practical, assigning students to their regular Language Arts teachers; e. Provide appropriate training to secondary teachers for implementation of these strategies; f. Monitor student progress and achievement using appropriate assessment devices. C. Mathematics. LRSD shall implement the following strategies to improve mathematics instruction: 1. Revise the mathematics curriculum to include a smaller number of concepts at each level, the use of manipulatives and problem solving and critical thinking and train teachers on its implementation; 2. Develop appropriate assessment devices for measuring individual student achievement and the success of the revised curriculum; 3. Provide resources for early intervention with students with mathematical problems and for training teachers on early intervention; and, 4. Revise the mathematics curriculum to increase the number of students successfully completing Algebra I and higher level mathematics courses. D. Funding. LRSD shall continue to provide additional funding to Franklin, Garland, Mitchell, Rightsell and Rockefeller elementary schools in accordance with the current formula as described 11 in August 16, 1995 report of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. E. Alternative Education. LRSD shall provide alternative educational opportunities to the extent practicable for those students unable to succeed in a traditional learning environment. F. Parental and Community Involvement. LRSD shall establish a parental and community relations linkage system to facilitate parental and community involvement in LRSD schools and the operation of LRSD. VI. Teacher Assignments. A. Beginning in the 1998-99 school year and for the term of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, LRSD reserves the right to reassign teachers and/or prohibit teacher transfers as reasonably necessary to ensure: 1. that to the extent practicable the percentage of African-American certified personnel in each LRSD school is within plus or minus fifteen percentage points from the percentage of African-American certified personnel in the district as a whole; and, 2. that to the extent practicable the certified personnel at one race, African- American schools (2.. 90% African-American) is comparable w~th the certified personnel at other LRSD schools with regard to years of teaching experience and number of teachers with advanced degrees. B. Reasonably Necessary. Reassigning and/or prohibiting the transfer of a teacher shall not be reasonably necessary where the desegrative impact would be substantially outweighed by the educational benefits of allowing a teacher to remain in his or her present assignment or to transfer to another assignment. 12 VII. LRSD Compliance Program. LRSD shall implement a desegregation compliance program which shall include the following components: A. Compliance standards and procedures reasonably capable of reducing the prospect of noncompliance; B. Oversight of compliance with such standards and procedures by the Superintendent; C. Communication of compliance standards and procedures to all employees; D. Utilization of monitoring and auditing systems reasonably designed to detect noncompliance; E. Utilization of a reporting system whereby employees can report noncompliance without fear of retribution, including an employee hotline; F. Enforcement of compliance standards and procedures through appropriate disciplinary mechanisms, including the discipline of individuals responsible for the failure to report noncompliance; and, G. After noncompliance has been detected, implementation of all reasonable steps to correct past noncompliance and to prevent further noncompliance, including modification of the compliance program as necessary to prevent and detect further similar noncompliance. VIII. Plan Modification Process. Before filing with the district court a proposed modification of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, LRSD shall follow the procedure set forth below: A. LRSD shall submit to the other parties and to the Office of 13 Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") its proposed modification along with an explanation of the circumstances justifying modification and the educational and financial impact of the proposed modification. B. Comment Period. Along with its notice of the proposed modification, LRSD shall establish a reasonable period of time (no less than ten days) for the parties and ODM to submit comments, recommendations or suggestions related to the proposed modification. C. Recommendation and Response. After the close of the comment period, LRSD shall file with the district court and serve on the parties its recommended modification and, at LRSD's discretion, a response to comments made by the parties and ODM. D. Hearing. Absent good cause shown, no party shall be permitted to raise an issue in opposition to LRSD's recommended modification unless that issue was raised by the party during the comment period. IX. Continuing Jurisdiction. A. General Rule. The district court shall have continuing jurisdiction to address issues regarding compliance with and modifications of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan during its term. Nothing in this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan shall effect the district court's jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement with the exception of the Pooling Agreement. B. Process For Raising Compliance Issues. Before requesting the district court exercise its jurisdiction with regard to a compliance issue, the party seeking to raise the issue shall follow the procedure set forth below: 1. The party shall as soon as reasonably practicable give the LRSD 14 Superintendent or his designee specific written notice which includes the following: a. the paragraph(s) of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan at issue; b. the names of all students involved, if any; c. the names of all LRSD agents or employees involved, if any; d. all facts of which the party is aware relevant to the compliance issue; and, e. a copy all documents in party's possession relevant to the compliance issue. 2. The written notice 1s intended to provide LRSD with all relevant information related to the compliance issue known to the parry so that LRSD can assess its compliance on the same basis the party. 3. LRSD shall conduct a reasonable investigation of the alleged noncompliance and shall provide the party a written response within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice from the party or such later time as agreed. 4. If the party is unsatisfied with LRSD's response, the party shall within 30 days of receipt of LRSD's response submit the compliance issue to ODM or the district court's designee for facilitation of an agreement between the parties. 5. If the compliance issue remains unresolved after good faith attempts at facilitation by ODM or the district court's designee, the party may seek resolution of the issue before the district court. 6. Unless and until ordered to do otherwise by the district court, LRSD shall 15 be free to implement the programs, policies and procedures the party alleges fail to comply with - this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. The term of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan shall be three (3) school years beginning the 1998-99 school year and ending on the last day of classes of the 2000-01 school year. XI. Transition. The 1997-98 school year shall be a transition year in preparation for implementation of this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. During this transition period, LRSD shall implement the May 1992 Desegregation Plan and Interdistrict Desegregation Plan to the extent they are consistent with this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. However, there shall be no ODM monitoring or litigation concerning LRSD's implementation of the May 1992 Desegregation Plan or the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. Rather, ODM shall monitor LRSD's preparation for implementation of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and act as a resource for LRSD in that process. XII. Unitarv Status. At the conclusion of the 2000-01 school year, the district court shall enter an order releasing LRSD from court supervision and finding LRSD unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations provided that LRSD has substantially complied with its obligations set forth in this Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 16 FRIDAY, ELDRED GE \u0026 CLARK 1411SCH(L H. FIIIOAY (11221114} WILLIAM H. IUTTON , , .A . .IAM(S W . WOOIIE IYIION M. EIS(MAN . .lllll . , P'.A . .10 D. IELL. P' .A . A l'ARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDlfALS AND l'ROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW  C . ECHOLS . ,. . A . SA. IUTTllllY , ,. .A . ElllllCl S . UIISEllllY , l\".A . LAllllZEUllllE, P' .A . OSCAII E. OAVl8 , .IA ., , . A . JAMES C . CLAAl , JA .. l\".A . THOMAS, . LEGGETT, l\" .A . JOHN O[W[Y WATSON, P' .A . ,AUL I . IENHAM Ill , l\" .A. LAIIIIY W. IUllll , fl . A . A. WYCI.LIFF NISl[T , Jl't ., fl . A. JAMES EOWAl'IO HA.lllll'IIS, l\" . A . J . l'HILLII\" MALCOM , l\" .A . JAME  M. SIMl'SON, l\" .A . JAMES M. SAXTON , , .A . J . SHErH[l'IO l'IUIIELL Ill , fl . A. DONALD H. IACON . l\" .A . WILLIAM THOMAS IAXT11 . ,. .A . WALTER A . l\"AULSON II , l\" .A . IAIIIIIY E. COl\"LIN , l\" .A . lllllCHAIIO 0 . TAYLOR , P' .A . JOIEl'H I . HURST, Jfl . , fl .A . [LIZAIETH IIOll[N MUflllllAY , , . A . CHfllSTO,HEl't HELLER , , . A . LAUllllA HENSLEY SMtTH , , . A . IIOIUIT I . SHAF[llll , fl .A . WILLIAM M. GIIIFFIN Ill , fl.A. MICHAELS . MOORE , l\" .A . DIANE 9 . MACl.[Y , , .A. WAL TOI M. EIEL Il l , l\" .A . I.EVIN A . CIIASS , l\" . A . WILLIAM A . WADDELL, JII ., l\" .A . John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING \u003c400 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3-413 TELEPHONE 501-378-2011 FAX NO . 501-378-21\u003c47 June 5, 1997 Re: Little Rock School District Work Teams Dear John "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1497","title":"Student handbooks, elementary school, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1997-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Standards","Educational law and legislation","Educational innovations","School attendance","School management and organization","School improvement programs","Student activities","Student assistance programs","School discipline","Student suspension","Parents","Education, Elementary"],"dcterms_title":["Student handbooks, elementary school, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1497"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["handbooks"],"dcterms_extent":["300 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1637","title":"Court filings concerning motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats, motion for taxation of costs, cross-petition for attorneys' fees, and enlargement of time","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-05"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","North Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School employees","School improvement programs","Employee rights"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats, motion for taxation of costs, cross-petition for attorneys' fees, and enlargement of time"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1637"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["86 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, two orders; District Court, notice of appeal; District Court, motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats; District Court, notice of appeal; District Court, motion for taxation of costs; District Court, brief in support of motion for taxation of costs; District Court, order; District Court, opposition of Joshua intervenors to motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats; District Court, motion for reconsideration; District Court, motion for additional enlargement of time; District Court, motion for reconsideration regarding Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (PACT's) motion for taxation for costs and PCSSD's cross-petition for attorneys' fees; District Court, brief in support of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) cross-motion for attorneys' fees; District Court, two orders, District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to Little Rock School District (LRSD), Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) motion for additional enlargement of time  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * * Plaintiff, * * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL., * * Defendant. * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., * * FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAYO o 1997 JAMES '(ii. Mc.fORMACK, CLERK By: '{._~t, /\\ N'\u003ei L':-\u003e _ OEP CL.ERK Intervenor. * MAY 7 \\997 * KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., * OFFICE OF * DESEGREGATION MONITORING Intervenor. * * SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT * SERVICES, A Limited Partnership, * * Intervenor. * ORDER Before the Court is the motion of 111 school districts throughout the State of Arkansas to intervene for the purpose of appealing this Court's Order of April 22, 1997, regarding health insurance matching. The motion is granted. appeal. The applicants may intervene in this case only for the purpose of prosecuting the DATED this {a~ay of May 1997. ~.~~,y UNITEDSTA DICJUDGE fl-IS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN co~ WITH RULE. 5e AND,100 79(a) FACP ON ~ 6-7 IV 1Jt:: 2974 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTIUCT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * * Plaintiff, * * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL., * * Defendant. * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., * * Intervenor. * * KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., * * Intervenor. * * SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT * SERVICES, A Limited Partnership, * * Intervenor. * ORDER f5l~D u s o:sr:.:cr couRr EASTERN DISTR!CT ARKANSAS MAYO 6 1997 JAMOS '/1. McGU~ACK, CLERK By: \\i ' \\.lJ\\ f\\J~ ~ DEP CLERK In November 1996, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") submitted its proposed 1996-97 budget to the Court for approval. The Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\"), the Joshua Intervenors, and the Arkansas Department of Education (\" ADE\") filed objections to the budget. For the reasons that follow, the Court hereby .. approves the budget. 2975 I. The ODM is funded through contributions from the three Pulaski County school districts and the State. The State's share is $200,000.00, which is based on the amount that the State was paying the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative in 1989, the date of the desegregation Settlement Agreement. Each district's share is determined on a per-pupil prorated basis. See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski Counry Special School District No. 1, 716 F. Supp. 1162, 1165 (E.D. Ark. 1989). The 1996-97 budget submitted by the ODM shows a marked increase in the Benefits category, from a budgeted amount of $49,613.00 in 1995-96 to a budgeted amount of $120,109.00 in 1996-97. The ODM states the increase is due to changes in the State's method of handling health insurance premiums and teacher retirement. In the past, the State directly - funded teacher retirement matching and health insurance payments for the State's school districts. Employees of the ODM were included in the list of employees the LRSD sent to the Teacher Retirement System, and the State paid contributions into the Retirement System on behalf of ODM employees. The State also paid 50% of the health insurance. Under the new State funding formula, no school district receives any money fnm the S;:ate that is specifically earmarked for the payment of teacher retirement and health benefits. Rather, Arkansas school districts are required to fund health insurance and teacher retirement out of state equalization funding or local funds. 1 1As applied to the three Pulaski County school districts, the Court recently found that the new funding scheme for teacher retirement and health insurance benefits violates the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the State and the settling districts. See doc. 2930 \u0026 doc. 2967. The ruling on teacher retirement is now on appeal to the Eighth Circuit, and the Court uooerstuxls the ruling on health insurance benefits also will be appealed.  2 The PCSSD objects to the budget, asserting that the State's decision to terminate the payment of teacher retirement and health insurance benefits for ODM employees results in an increased contribution by the PCSSD to the ODM budget. The PCSSD asks the Court to direct the State to increase its base level of support for the ODM to the same level that it supports educational cooperatives. The ADE objects to the ODM's proposed budget, contending that the State is not responsible for paying retirement or health benefits for ODM employees and that ODM employees were and are ineligible to participate in the teacher retirement system. Finally, the Joshua Intervenors object to the ODM budget because they believe the ODM should employ three additional monitors in order to handle and investigate complaints of discriminatory treatment of black students. II. In Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 716 F. Supp. 1162, 1165 (E.D. Ark. 1989), Judge Woods directed the ADE to apply \"the amount previously ordered for the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative\" toward the budget of the Office of the Metropolitan Supervisor (\"OMS\"). The court further authorized the Supervisor to employ a professional staff of up to four people and stated: \"In addition to each district's portion of Mr. Reville' s salary, it should add an amount equal to its portion of fringe benefits (e.g. hospitalization insurance), using the percentage used in calculating fringe benefits for the highest ranking person in that district. This 'fringe benefit' amount will apply toward offsetting the penalty Mr. Reville will suffer by leaving the New York pension program prior to the expiration of his six-year contract in Buffalo.\" .. 3 In December 1990, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals replaced the OMS with the . ODM, see Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990), and in February 1991, this Court found that the State was obligated to continue funding ODM according to its previous obligation. See doc. 1442 (Order filed on February 28, 1991). In July 1991, the Court directed the LRSD, \"in the interest of administrative efficiency,\" to \"provide payroll services to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) for all ODM staff designated by the Desegregation Monitor.\" See doc. 1480. The employees of ODM have been listed as LRSD employees in reports submitted to the Teacher Retirement System for purposes of teacher retirement payments, and the State has been paying contributions into the Retirement System for at least the past five years on behalf of ODM employees. The State now argues that it is not and has never been obligated by order or agreement to pay retirement or health benefits for ODM employees or to permit ODM employees to participate in the teacher retirement system. The State claims that employees of ODM have been participating in the Teacher Retirement System and the State has been paying retirement 3Jld health insurance benefits for them without authorization under State law or an order of this Court. The ADE asks the Court to permit it to end and reverse any unauthorized participation by ODM employees in the Teacher Retirement System and provide guidance as to the disposition of any funds that may have been erroneously paid into the Teacher Retirement System by the State on behalf of \"ineligible\" ODM employees. 4 III. \\ The Court finds that the employees of the ODM are entitled to receive teacher retirement and health benefits as other employees of the three Pulaski County school districts. When Judge Henry Woods recused in this case on July 6, 1990, he stated that if members of the OMS wished to return to their jobs with the school districts from which they came, the school districts must reinstate them. Judge Woods further barred the districts -from retaliating against these employees. See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 740 F. Supp. 632, 633 (E.D.Ark. 1990). This Court reiterated that in an Order dated January 17, 1991. See doc. 1418. Thus, the Court did not intend that the employees of the OMS/ ODM suffer as a result of moving from positions within the school districts to the OMS and its successor, the ODM. In addition, in spite of the State's claim that it did not know that ODM employees were receiving retirement and health benefits funded by the State, there is no indication that the arrangement with the LRSD was hidden from the State. The Court sent counsel for the State a copy of the proposed 1990-91 budget of the OMS and asked for any objections. See doc. 1391. The ADE did not object to tne budgeted amount for berefits. See doc. 1397. When in December 1990 the Eighth Circuit directed the Court to vacate the order creating the OMS and replace it with the ODM, the appeals court stated the office should be staffed by a monitor and such additional personnel as the Court deemed appropriate. See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990). In addition, the Court noted in September 1991 that the Arkansas Legislative Joint Auditing Committee would conduct annual audits of the ODM, and copies of the audit would be available to the parties. 5 See doc. 1510. Previously, the attorneys for the State were present, at this Court's request, for an August 7, 1991 hearing, at which the' Court discussed the ODM's budget and made reference to the audit by the Arkansas Legislative Audit Committee. See doc. 1507 at 10, 19. The Court finds that while the State may not have been aware that the employees of the ODM were being counted as employees of the LRSD for purposes of retirement and health benefits, this arrangement was not improper as a method of securing those benefits for ODM employees. See doc. 1480 (LRSD to provide payroll services to the ODM for all ODM staff designated by the Desegregation Monitor). Nor was the information unavailable to the State as the Legislative Audit was conducting annual audits of the ODM. The Court therefore finds that the objections of the ADE are without merit and will not require any repayment of funds previously applied. The Court, however, rejects the PCSSD's request that the State be required to provide teacher retirement and health benefits to the ODM employees as it does the educational cooperatives. Additionally, the Court finds no authority or suggestion in the record justifying an increase in the State's share of the ODM budget. Therefore, the Court will not order the State to increase its contribution to the ODM: budget. The Cot!.,1 expects the three districts to share the expense of the benefits package for the ODM employees in the same manner that they contribute to the ODM budget. 6 IV. With regard to the objections of the'Joshua Intervenors, the Court does not now intend to direct the ODM to employ additional monitors for the purpose of investigating complaints of discriminatory treatment in the disciplining of black students. Should the ODM determine that additional staff are necessary to carry out its obligations, the ODM may make such request to the Court. V. The Court having carefully reviewed the budget and the objections received thereto, see doc. 2870, 2885, 2886, the Court finds that the proposed 1996-97 budget for ODM should be and hereby is approved in its entirety . . -fl.._ IT IS SO ORDERED this \u0026 day of May 1997. ~l~~~ff UNITED STAT ms CJUDGE 7 MAY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION ? 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. NOTICE OF APPEAL PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Arkansas Department of Education appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the District Court's order, filed April 22, 1997 and entered on the docket sheet on April 23, 1997, granting summary judgment in favor of the Little Rock School District, the North Little Rock School District, and Pulaski County Special School District \"on the issue of state fundLTJ.g of the public school employee insurance program.\" Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General ~  TIMO ~tio19 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 7220 l (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this 6th day of May, 1997, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones III WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, AR 72201-3699 Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 E. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 3 John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Richard Roachell ROACHELL \u0026 STREET 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. THOMPSON \u0026 LLEWELLYN 412 S. 18th Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 RECE~VED PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL litr-id- W-Yen J !.'./.\\)' 8 1997 \u003c/:~,,,,,., OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MDrJliORING MOTION TO RELEASE INCENTIVE SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN SEATS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS For its motion to release incentive school kindergarten seats, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. LRSD encouraged parents who reside in the incentive - school zones to register their children for kindergarten during the registration process. Many black parents have registered their children but those children cannot be assigned because of the number of seats which have been reserved for white students. These are the only parents in the district who are presently unable to receive assignments. 2. The LRSD engaged in vigorous recruitment efforts during the 1996-97 school year as it prepared for registration for the 1997-98 school year. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a partial listing of those recruitment efforts conducted by the district. Additionally, the information contained in the district's quarterly program planning and budget documents status reports and project management tools serve to supplement this listing. 3. Although the recruitment efforts yielded positive results, seats still remain vacant at the kindergarten level in the incentive schools. 4. Taking into consideration the importance of reserving seats for the recruitment of white students, the LRSD made special efforts during the recruitment season to register as many new white students as possible into these programs. The seats that still remain vacant should now be released to black students who can benefit from the educational opportunities which will be provided. 5. Attached to this motion as Exhibit 2 is a copy of the LRSD incentive school kindergarten assignments for the 1997-98 school year as of April 22, 1997. LRSD seeks permission to fill the - vacancies shown on Exhibit 2 with students from the waiting list. 6. LRSD is not seeking to release four-year-old program seats at this time. The district will continue its effort to recruit white parents for the four-year-old program and, to the extent seats remain vacant, will petition the court at a later date for release of those seats. WHEREFORE, the Little Rock School District moves for an order permitting it to release the vacant kindergarten seats at the incentive schools for the 1997-98 school year to students on the waiting list. {:\\bomc\\btll),llne!moe.- Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 B~ Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of Incentive School Kindergarten following by depositing copy of this 8th day of May, 1997. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (:lliomolb1l,yllndlnao.- the foregoing Motion To Release Seats has been served on the same in the United States mail on 3 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 4 - April 21 , 1997 To: ~ancy Acre, Director of Student Assignmen1 From: Bed..-y Rather. Essie Middleton. Parent Recruiters Re: Recruitment efforts for third quaner 96-97 January edition of Little Rock Family Magazine published Public School Issue as a results of our involvement. Jan. 2 Worked with Dawn Jackson in planning neighborhood parent meeting. Jan. 6 Provided packets to Rector Phillips Morse Realtors Jan. 6 Mailed 15,000 Home and School Connection newsletters informing parents of registration. Jan. 6 Mailed registration packets to: I 3 5 Childcare centers 44 Homeowners Associations 210 Special Interest Patrons of Little Rock 88 Ministers Jan. i Gave presentation to HlPPY staff Jan. IO Held registration training meeting with all school secretaries. Jan.. IO Taped promo for Channel 11. \"Always Kids, Educated Choice\" Jan. 13 ?resented aI (?- grade transition evening meeting at Crystal Hill Jan. 13-14 Show and Tell in all schools sponsored and advertised through . .\u003c\\!Hance for Our Public Schools Jan.. 14 Attended PTA Council meeting aI Pulaski Heights Elementary Jan. 14 Presented at Early Childhood meeting Jan_ 14 Presented at evening HIPPY parent group meeting Jan. 16 Sent flyers home with elementary children on registration Jan. 16 Mailed letters to all P-4s on v.-aiting list to encourage kindergarten registration. Jan. 16-17 Posted flyers throughout the city on registration. Jan.. 16 Attended evening parent meeting in private home of Dawn Jack.son. Jan.. 17 An.ended 6~ grade orientation aI Dunbar Jan. 17 Mailed 400 brochur~ to PCSSD on Incentive Schools Jan.. 18 Panicipated in Saturday Mall show Jan. 2 I Registration begins through Jan. 3 L Jan 21 Open House, Elementary magnets Jan. 21 Provided information to Christ Temple Church Jan_ 24 Assist Steve Pintor Realtors Jan. 27 Assist Rainey Realty Jan. 27 Opai House. Incentive and Interdistria Jan. 28 Open House. Elementary Area and Secondary Magnet Jan.. 30 Participate in Arlc:ansas Legislative Day on Education with PTA Jan. 30 Open House, Secondary Area Jan. 31 Assist McNeil Smith Realtors Feb . 3 Evening presentation to network of Exeaitive Women Feb. 4 Presentation to Charlotte John Realty Feb. 4 Report of Biracial Committee Feb . 6 Presentation of Superintendents Student Council al Hall High Feb. 6 Parent Involvement meeting Feb. 7 Work with CARE office Feb. 8 Anend Sarurday, Title l Parent Involvement program Feb IO Open House, Metropolitan Feb IO Chili Supper at Mabelvale Junior High Feb 11 Attend PTA Founders Day luncheon Feb 11 Report 10 Early Childhood board on 4-year--old registration Feb 12 HIPPY board meeting Feb 17 Meet with Southwest Jr. High Recruitment team Feb I 8 Assist in assigning magnet students Feb 19 Attend Kids Count Coalition at Children's Hospital Feb 20 Meet with PCSSD PTA parents Feb'.? 1 Worlc with McKay Realry Feb 24 Meet with Janet Jones Realty Feb 2A Meet ,1,ith ~1LR PTA parents Feb 24 An.end HIPPY Black History Celebration Feb 26 Participate in Parent Involvement Workshop for Secondary Vice Principals Feb 28 Participare in parent Involvement Workshop for Elementary Vice Principals Mar 3 Assist Byer Agent Realtors Mar 4 Mail assignment letters Mar 4 Report to Biracial Committee Mar S -~ ho-well Realtors Mar 9 Desegregation application opened through Mar. 28 Mar 10 Worked with T omado victims in reassignment or transpOrtarion Mar 10.As.sembly for Success Mar 11 Anend PT A Council at mcClellan ~-1ar 1.2.Anend Friends Day at King Mar 13 Assisted Grobmyer Realty Mar 13 Requested labels from PCSSD to assist Hall High with recruitment Mar 18 Presentation to Janet Jones Realty Mar 19 Spent afternoon with Lisa Woodrow. new relocation specialist for RPM Realty :Mar20 Compiled Recruinnent Survey Results \\far 25 HIPPY Parent Appreciation Mar 26 Worked with Barbara Sumpter. new relocation specialist for Entergy Mar 27 Early Childhood Parent Involvement meeting.. Pro\";ded 80 packets for mailouts Pro\\;ded 31 tours to individual families during this guaner December 19, 199-j- To: From: Nancy Acre, Directo\u0026 of Student Assignment .\"'{! J ;,- / ~ ~\"-13,ecky Rather \u0026 ~;,i,t(ddleton, Parent Recruiters Re: Recruitment Report, 2nd Quarter, 96-97 OCTOBER 2 Attend Youth Suicide Planning Meeting 3\u00264 Held Recruitment Workshops for all Principals and individual school recruitment teams. 5 Participate in Youth Suicide Conference 7 Met with LR Fa.1nily Magazine on story ideas for public school issue. 7 Met with Booker recruitment team 8 Attended PTA Council at Rightsell 8 Assisted UALR with maps 8 Assisted with Garland PrA recruitlllent 9 Met with Junior High principals and Dr. Anderson on planning transition meeting 10-11Delivered recruitment packets to schools not attending recruitment workshops 11 Prepared Program Budget Document Report 14 set up dates to meet with HIPPY 15 All school level recruitll1ent plans due 17 Attend Parent Involvement Advisory committee meeting 21 Send PYI to all elementary principals on 6th grade transition meeting 24 Met with Alliance for Our Public Schools 24 Attend Kids Count meeting 24 Mailed 216 letters to churches and homeowners associations about transition meeting 28 Mailed transition meeting letters to all 6th grade parents in the District 28 Delivered 600 transition flyers to PCSSD 28 Met with Eddie Collins and Susie Roberts at PCSSD about meetings on recruitment to incentive schools 31 Attended PUblic Education Forum 31 Met at Henderson about Jr. High meeting 31 Met with HIPPY advisory board NOVEMBER 1 Sent newly developed recruitment survey in tablet form to all schools to have parents fill out and return to parent recruiters. 1 Held meeting with communications on registration 7 Participated in evening meeting with Southwest Little Rocle United for Progress 10 Tour with 15 6th grade parents from Cathedral School at Mann, Dunbar and Pulaski Heights 12 Mailed letter to 6th grade private school letters - - 12 12 13 14 14 15 17 18 18 19 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 2S 25 25 26 27 inviting to transition meeting Attended regional PTA meeting with parents from all school districts Attended PTA Council at Badgett Attended meeting in Pine Bluff on school vouchers Sent flyers home with all 6th graders about meetings Prepare agenda, survey, and last minute details for Sunday meeting Schools first Bi-monthly recruitment survey due Held 6th grade transition meeting attended by approximately 600 parents Assisted with two tours at Cloverdale Jr. High Assisted with two tours at Dunbar Jr. High Meet about registration Mailed 100 evaluations to parents who attended transition meeting Assist at parent meeting on Adolescents Assisted with two tours at Forest Heights Assisted with t~o tours at Henderson Assisted with two tours at Mabelvale Jr. Assisted with two tours at Mann Jr. Met with Alliance for Our Public Schools about registration Assisted with two tours at PHJH Assisted with two tours at Southwest Met with Geyer Springs recruitment team Attended local meeting on charter schools Mailed Thank You notes to transition participants DECEMBER 2 3 4 4 6 6 9 10 11 12 12 13 16 17 17 17 17 18 19 20 Attended meeting with Hall High School parents Parent Open House at PH.JH Met with. principal at Hall High Met with committee on incentive schools Attended 90th birthday party at Rightsell Met with new principal at Mitchell on recruitment Parent open House at Forest Heights Made presentations on registration and legislation at PTA Council at Geyer Springs Attended luncheon for realtors at Forest Heights Attended Legislative meeting Attended Parent Involvement ~eeting Participated in planning meeting for PTA Founders Day Prepare mailouts for ministers, daycares and Housing Authority for registration Mail transition meeting evaluation results to schools Request private school labels for recruitment Met with Connie Whitfield on Rightsell and Mitchell recruitment Make Biracial Cot:llllittee report Attend celebration at Martin Luther King Attend meeting for legislative Advocates for Kids Attend ~eeting with Alliance for Our Public Schools The parent recruiters toured 48 families during the second quarter (Oct.-Dec.) of 96-97. Each family tour includes between one and six schools, depending on the grade level of child and availability of seats. At the special tours for 6th grade parents, the 16 tours at the junior highs ranged from 1 set of parents at one tour to approximately 80 at another. November 25, 1996 To: From: Re: JULY Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment Becky Rather \u0026 Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Recruitment Report, 1st Quarter, 96-97 1-31 Developed ad for Kid's Directory featuring Incentive Schools, CARE, 4-year-old program and registration dates. Ad was distributed trhoughout month of July 2 Met with Suellen Vann a.bout new Incentive School brochures 10 Met with Mable Donaldson for information on Gifted/Talented in schools 10 Mailed letter to all white students on 4-year-oid waiting lists offering available seats 12 Met with Parent Involvement Administrative Team about new District Parent Involvelllent Policy 14 sent memo to communications outlining agreed upon plans for Incentive Schools 17 Presented recruitment plans for the year to Director of Student Assignment 17 Met with Alliance for OUr Public Schools 19 L.~D 96-97 calendars ready for distribution to Realtors, prospective parents, etc. 19 Registration letters and flyers mailed to 156 churches and childcare providers in the city. 22 Attended monthly meeting of Parent Involvement Administrative Team 23 Met with Janet Jones Realty to provide new calendars 24 Work with new principal at Chicot on recruitment for school 24 Met with Pat Price on Parent Involvement workshop 25 Sent OERFs to McClellan and Henderson for recruitlllent efforts 25 Met with Ark. Co!!lIIlunity Fou.ndation 25 Julie Wiedower represented office in Magnet Meeting 29 Mailed calendars to all LRSD households informing them of registration, school opening dates, etc. 29 Participated in Principal Workshop on Parent Involvement 30 Attended Parent Involvement Conference with State Dept. 31 Attended Nuts \u0026 Bolts on Planning 31 Developed new letter to newcomers AUGUST 1 Press releases distributed on registration dates l Hold Secretaries inservice on registration \" - - 1\u00262 3 5 7\u00268 12 13 14 15 23 26 26 27 27 29 JO Distributed registration posters throughout city in grocery stores, housing projects, medical offices, youth centers, Department of Human Services, etc. Meet with McKay Realtors Worked on CARE closing at several schools Registration in Schools Attend Early Childhood meeting Attend PTA Council Workshop at Ro~ine Met with Alliance for our Public Schools Nancy Acre met with ODM, PCSSD, NLR Sent letter to Communications about Incentive brochure Interdistrict schools open houses Magnet elementary schools open houses Area schools open houses Incentive schools open houses Mann, Dunbar, Metro open houses contact Sterling Ingran on extended day information SEPTEMBER 3 3 4 5 9 10 10 12 12 16 17 18 23 23 25 25 26 JO Assist Henderson Pl'A Ju..~ior High open houses Acre met with Bowles, Collins, Acklin, Jackson High school magnets open houses Area high schools open houses PTA Council ueeting Board Room Report to Biracial Co11I111ittee Attend Parent Involvement Administrative Team meeting Assist Henderson in Recruitment Attend Department of Education retreat Talked to Fa1nily Magazine about prOl:lotional stories due day - Gathered lists of names of recruitment team members from each school Worked with Sweeney Realty Review incentive school brochure Held meeting on planning 6th grade orientation Attended Kids Count meeting at Arkansas Children's Hospital Assist McCaskell Realty Attend Amendment One meeting at Governor's mansion The parent recruiters toured 16 families during the first quarter (July-Sept.) of 96-97. Each family tour includes between one and six schools, depending on the grade level of child and availability of seats. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ASSIGNMENTS AT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1997-98 AS OF 4/22/97 ENROLLED WAITING LIST SCHOOL BL W/0 TOTAL VACANCY %BL BL AZ* W/0 CAPACITY Franklin 52 6 58 22 89.7% 33 13 0 80 Garland 23 3 26 14 88.5% 14 2 0 40 Mitchell 20 3 23 17 87.0% 36 13 0 40 Rightsell 20 2 22 18 91.0% 29 13 0 40 Rockefeller 28 26 54 6 52.0% 49 0 0 60 TOTALS 143 40 183 77 78.1 % 161 41 0 260 BL - Black Students W /0 - White and Other Students AZ* - Students who live in the attendance zone *The attendance zone students on the Incentive Schools' wa1tmg list registered during the initial registration period in January. These students were unable to be assigned to their zone schools due to rising P4 students who filled all seats available for black students. These students were the ~ students who registered during January that could run be assigned to their attendance zone school. I' 'V I , FILED U.S. DISTRICT COU\"'l' EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSA8 1,:f\\ I .I. ;_ 1997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT MAY 1 4 1997 CFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT V PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL LR-C-82-866 NOTICE OF APPEAL By: __________ _ OEP CLERK PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS Notice is hereby given that the Intervenors, 111 Arkansas School Districts, listed on Attachment 1, as Defendants in the above case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the District Court's Order entered in this action on April 23, 1997. Respectfully submitted, INTERVENING SCHOOL DISTRICTS, DE.f\"C...NDANTS THOMPSON AND LLEWELLYN, P.A. 412 South 18th Street P. 0. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-818 Telephone: 501-785-2867 Facsimile: 501-782-8046 r. #66040 THE NITED ST A TE DISTRlCT CO RT EASTERN DI TRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISlON i,i,'.\\ Y 1 5 1S97 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT av: -------,o~E\":,\"\";:,_rcLIEE~Ri\u003c PLAI TIFF V. 0. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COU TY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 0. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. ~'Av l : o::n f 'I, J .., lvv, OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING MOTIO FORT AXA TION OF COSTS DEFENDANTS INIERVENORS INIERVENORS ll\\TER.VENORS Knight, et al. , Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, ROA CHELL LAW FIRM, for their Motion for Taxatio "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1646","title":"Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) statement of material and undisputed facts with respect to issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-02-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Pulaski County Special School District","Little Rock School District","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School employees","Employee rights","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) statement of material and undisputed facts with respect to issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1646"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["50 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  .. RECE~VED FILED FEB 181997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT co~\"0AfJ~~~l./,~~,~::,c:A~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FEB '1 0 1997 DESEGREi~~: ~tNITOR!NG WESTERN DMSION JAr..'.[:i W. NICvlJrtMnul'\\, liL~RK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL By: ____ -:;::;;-;:;-;;-;;;;- oEP CLERK FEB 1 ::- 10 OFFiC2 ..,, DESEGREGATIOt~ MONITORJNG DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S RESPONSE TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL AND UNDISPUTED FACTS WITH RESPECT TO ISSUES OF HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING The Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") responds to PCSSD, LRSD and NLRSD's \"Statement of Material and Undisputed Facts\" with respect to issues of health insurance, special education and loss funding as follows: Fact No, 1: State EquaHzation Funding - Act 917 of 1995 changed the method the State uses to distribute aid to school districts. Prior to 1996-97 the Department of Education distributed the majority of state aid as Minimum Foundation Program Aid (MFPA). In addition, the state funded other programs such as Transportation Aid and At-Risk Grants by formulas or based on need. The ' I  State also paid Teacher Retirement Matching and Health Insurance Matching on behalf of school districts. The calculation for MFP A included add-on weights for various categories such as Special Education, Isolated School Districts, Consolidation Incentives, Vocational Education and (sic) Centers, Gifted and Talented Students, and growth and loss funding (Arkansas Budget System, Agency Program Commentary for the 1997-1999 Biennium, (\"ABS\") p. 29). Act 917 now requires State Equalization Funds to be distributed to districts based on the number of students, Average Daily Membership (ADM), equalized by the wealth of the district. The purpose of this funding is to equalize the disparities of property wealth throughout Arkansas (ABS p. 29). ADE's Response: It is undisputed that the Districts have accurately quoted the ABS. However, the statement that the purpose of Equalization Funding is to \"equalize the disparities of property wealth\" between districts is an oversimplification. The formula for calculating Equalization Funding takes into account local assessed property values, miscellaneous funds, the amount of funds available for Equalization Funding, and the number of students in the State and in each district. See generally Sections 4(d), 4(n), 4(s) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-203(4), (14) and (19)). More precisely stated, the purpose of equalization funding is to reduce the disparity of total state and local funds available to school districts for the education of children. 2  I Moreover, the Districts inaccurately state that the quoted passage from ABS comes from the \"Agency Program Commentary\" section. In fact, the quoted passage comes from the section entitled \"Analysis of Budget Request,\" which is drafted by the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, and not ADE. Fact No. 2: Prior to this fiscal year, the _$tate distributed formula aid utilizing weighted average daily memberships (\"W ADM''). ADE's Response: It is undisputed that W ADM was one of several factors used in the calculation of Minimum Foundation Program Aid for school districts prior to fiscal year 1996-97. See generally Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-306 (b) (Michie 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July 1, 1996). Fact No. 3: The previous Arkansas school funding formula (Act 34) used W ADM to determine the amount of money a school district received. The formula added weights to account for the high cost of educating certain students and provided more money for those students. The add-on weights included: special education, gifted and talented, vocational education, isolated district, consolidation incentive funds, growing district, loss funding, and vocational centers. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 8) ADE's Response: It is undisputed that WADM was one of several factors used in the calculation of Minimum Foundation Program Aid for school districts prior to fiscal year 1996-97. See generally Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-306 (b) (Michie 3 - 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July 1, 1996). It is also undisputed that the calculation of W ADM included weights for special education, gifted and talented, vocational education, isolated district, consolidation incentive funds, growth funding, loss funding, and vocational centers. Fact No, 4: It was not clear that the add.-on weights that were assigned were sufficient to meet the needs of the students. For 1994-95, the W ADM was approximately 505,000, of which 435,000 was actual students and 70,000 was addon weights. The percentage of add-ons in districts ranged from 6% to 40%. There were some students who, because of their high need, generated three times the SBER (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 9) (Gooden p. 17). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 5: Any aid distributed for health insurance matching this fiscal year will be distributed on an \"equalized\" ADM basis and will not consider employee costs or numbers of employees. ADE's Response: Disputed. There is no appropriation for \"health insurance matching\" for school district employees in Act 1194 of 1995 for 1996- 97, and there are no identifiable or earmarked \"health insurance matching\" dollars distributed to school districts as state equalization funding. Rather, under Section 14 of Act 1194 of 1995 the responsibility for paying the health insurance contribution rate for eligible employees has now been shifted to school districts 4 throughout the State. A school district may satisfy this obligation in total or in part with moneys received from the State as state equalization funding, and it may satisfy this obligation in part or in whole with local revenue. Moreover, the statutory formula for the distribution of state equalization funding does not \"equalize\" ADM. Rather, the formula \"equalizes\" or \"adjusts\" the amount of money distributed per ADM to each district based upon a district's local wealth. See response to Fact No. 1. Fact No. 6: The State has terminated its payment of health insurance matching for the employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\"). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 7: The responsibility for funding health insurance matching for employees of the ODM has now become the responsibility of the three school districts in Pulaski County and their contributions to the budget of the ODM have been increased accordingly. ADE's Response; Disputed. The obligation for paying for health insurance matching for ODM employees now rests with ODM. The total ODM budget is funded by contributions from the three Districts and the State. Fact No. 8: For 1994-95, $36,315,000 was budgeted for public school employee insurance which was paid (by the State) to Blue Cross Blue Shield for insurance for teachers. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 24(8)). 5 ADE's Response: Disputed. The $36,315,000 budgeted for public school employee insurance was budgeted for the payment of health insurance matching for all eligible employees who elected to participate in the Public School Health Insurance program. The pool of eligible employees included teachers and other eligible \"non-teacher\" school district employees~ Fact No. 9: Public School Employee Insurance - provides for health insurance contributions for employees of the Cooperative Education Service Areas, Vocational Centers and the school operated by the Department of Correction. The priority request of$36,030 in FY98 and $74,222 in FY99 allows for a 6% growth in rates of employees (ABS p. 13). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 10: Public School Employee Insurance - This program pays the health insurance contribution rate established by the State Board of Education for employees of the Cooperative Education Services Areas, Vocational Centers, and the school operated by the Department of Correction (ABS p. 32). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 11: Any aid distributed and thus available for special education costs this fiscal year will be distributed on an \"equalized\" ADM basis and will not consider the costs of educating special education students. (Rossmiller, p. 99) 6 ADE's Response: Disputed. The cited testimony of Dr. Rossmiller concerned the formula for calculation of state equalization funding. While Act 1194 contains appropriations for 1996-97 for, e.g., Special Education Services and Early Childhood Special Education, there is no general \"special education\" appropriation for distibution to school districts, and there are no identifiable or eannarked \"special education\" dollars distributed to school districts as state equalization funding. School districts may fund special education programs in whole or in part with moneys received from the State as state equalization funding, from local revenue, or from federal funds. Moreover, the statutory formula for the distribution of state equalization funding does not \"equalize\" ADM. Rather, the formula \"equalizes\" or \"adjusts\" the amount of money distributed per ADM to each district based upon, among other things, a district's local wealth. See response to Fact No. 1. Fact No, 12: School districts located in urban centers with extensive medical services available can anticipate a high concentration of high cost special education students. (Gooden, p. 17) ADE's Response: Disputed. The Districts have not produced any evidence that they have such a \"high concentration\" of such \"high cost\" students. School districts with small enrollments may have a higher percentage or 7 - concentration of severely disabled students than school districts located in urban areas. Sydoriak Deposition at 62: 17-63 :8. Fact No, 13: At page 14 of the ABS, the ADE has commented in part concerning residential centers that: \"Students are the responsibility of the district where the facility is located.\" ADE's Response: It is undisputed that these Districts have accurately quoted page 14 of the \"ABS.\" However, the statement is not accurate. The District where the facility is located is responsible for the children if it is known at the time of placement that the placement will be for more than 60 days. If it is not known at the time of placement that the placement will be for more than 60 days, the district from which the child originated is responsible for the first 60 days, and the district in which the facility is located is responsible for the child beginning with day 61 of placement. Sydoriak Deposition (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) at 8:22-9:5. Fact No, 14: Residential Centers - This is a special education program to provide reimbursement to school districts for educational costs associated with students in approved residential tre.atment facilities. Prior to 1996- 97, the ABS asserts, the program was funded as an add-on weight through the minimum Foundation Aid program. The 1995-96 reimbursement of approximately 8 $6 million funded 710 beds in 8 approved residential treatment facilities. The Department has budgeted $6,512,000 for FY97 (ABS p. 27). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 15: The priority request of$856,662 in FY98 and $908,062 for FY99 is to provide additional funding for anticipated growth in student placement at approved residential treatment facilities and/or juvenile . detention facilities (ABS p. 27). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 16: For the 1996-97 school year, the special education specialists at the Arkansas Department of Education calculated that an appropriation in excess of $12,000,000 would be necessary to fund the costs for residential education. ADE's Response: Disputed. In May of 1996 the administrator for grants and data management for ADE's Special Education division calculated that approximately $12 million would be necessary for funding of students in residential treatment facilities under the fund distribution method that existed prior to the enactment of Act 917 of 1995. At the time the calculation was made, the individual who made the calculation was unaware that the method of distribution had been changed by Act 917. Sydoriak Deposition at 15:19-17:23. The new fund distribution method, as was the case under the distribution method in effect prior to 9 - the enactment of Act 917, is a pure funding \"pass through\" in which residential treatment facilities do not bill school districts in excess of the amount of state funding provided to the district. The amounts distributed under the prior and new law are therefore, by definition, \"adequate.\" Sydoriak Deposition at 39:11-40:12. Fact No, 17: For the 1995-96 school year, the State reimbursed school districts approximately $57 per child per day for treatment in residential treatment facilities. For this school year, those school districts, including the districts in Pulaski County, have been advised that this per diem reimbursement has been reduced to just over $44 per child per day for the same treatment. ADE's Response: Undisputed. It is also undisputed that no treatment facility, including the facilities located in Pulaski County, is charging any school district in excess of the state's current per diem reimbursement rate. ~ response to Fact No. 16. Fact No, 18: Pursuant to Act 1194, there was no line item appropriation for student growth funding for the previous fiscal year but the line item appropriation for this fiscal year is $29,000,000. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Under the school funding statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1996, student growth funding was not a separate line item appropriation but rather was generated through a ''weight\" as part of Minimum 10 -' . .1 Foundation Program Aid. See Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-302(1) (Michie 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July l, 1996). Fact No, 19: Student Growth - This provides school districts additional funding for first quarter growth in the number of students over the .. previous year's ADM. Prior to 1996-97, student growth was part of the Minimum Foundation Aid calculation (ABS p. 25). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 20: In 1995-96 the state funded growth of approximately 7,400 additional students times the State Base Equalization [sic] (SBER) of $2,754 for a total of $20.3 million. For 1996-97 growth funding is calculated as the Base Local Revenue Per Student (\"BLRPS\") (currently $3,759) times .4 plus $1,500 for a total of $3,003 per student This rate is then multiplied by the increase in the district's ADM for the first quarter over the previous year's ADM. For FY97 the Department has budgeted $22.6 million for Student Growth (ABS p. 25). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 21: Act 917 retained student growth funding as a feature of state aid for districts with expanding enrollments. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Student Growth funding for 1996-97 is provided from available funds in a line-item appropriation within the Public School Fund. See Sections 3(b )and 4(u) of Act 917 of 1995, Ark. Code Ann.  6- 11 - - 20-303(21), 6-2~307(a). All districts with inar.asing ADM, including PCSSD, LRSD and NLRSD, will receive growth funding for the 1996-97 school year. See Declaration of Tristan Greene in Opposition to 1his Motion (\"Greene Declaration\"), 12 and Exh. A Fact No, 22: Subsection (b )( 4) foDd that there were 24,166 students in kindergarten through Grade 12 in the state's largest school district. ADE's Response: As written, this \"f.acf' is unintelligible. Assuming the Districts are referring to Section 2(bX4) of Act 917 of 1995, it is undisputed. Fact No, 23: The state's largest school district is the Little Rock School District. ADE's Response: Assuming this .. fact' refers specifically to a comparison of school districts by the.ir Average Daily Membership, it is undisputed. If this \"fact\" refers to geographic area, it is disputed. FactNo.24: In fiscal year 1995 State funds for public schools totaled approximately $1.2 billion, of which $941 million was distributed through the Minimum Foundation Program Aid Formula (\"MFPA\") and approximately $300 million was distributed outside ofMFPA (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 6) ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 25: School districts received money outside the Act 34 MFPA formula to help offset the costs of transportation. The Act 34 formula took 12  into account the size of a district, the number of students to be transported and the age and size of the buses used. Under the Act 34 formula the state used to disburse transportation funds, some districts received more money than they actually spent on transportation and some districts did not receive enough money to cover their actual costs of transportation. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 28) ADE's Response: The school funding statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1995 contained no formula for distribution of transportation funds. Transportation funds were distributed based upon a formula contained in Rules and Regulations promulgated by the State Board of Education. With the foregoing qualification, Fact No. 25 is undisputed . Fact No, 26: Transportation aid was eliminated under Act 1194 as a separate line item and incorporated into the new school funding formula (ABS, p. 32). ADE's Response: It is unclear what is meant by the term \"incorporated into.\" It is undisputed that Act 1194 contains no specific line-item appropriation for Transportation Aid for 1996-97. It is also undisputed that Act 917 includes \"Transportation Aid\" in the definition of \"Student Needs Funding.\" See Section 4(v) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-303(22)). However, to the extent the Districts claim that there is some identifiable amount of\"Transportation Aid\" being distributed as state equalization funding, the fact is disputed. There are no 13 identifiable or earmarked \"transportation aid\" funds in state equalization funding. School districts may pay their transportation costs in whole or in part with funds received from the State as state equalization funding or in whole or in part with local revenue. See Section 3(a) of Act 917 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-309(a)). Fact No. 27: Page 14 of the ABS_contains a new request by the Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") for $10,000,000 each fiscal year \"to assist districts with high cost transportation.\" This is a \"priority request\" of the Arkansas Department of Education. ADE's Response: Undisputed. ADE has requested an appropriation of $10 million for fiscal years 1997-98 and 1998-99 to assist districts with high transportation costs. The Executive Recommendation, however, is for a total of $10 million dollars for each year to be used for assisting districts with high transportation costs and for funding safety training for school bus drivers and mechanics. So that the Court will not be misled, \"priority request\" is a tenn of art that simply means a request for an appropriation that is in excess of Base Level. All such requests are called \"priority requests\" in the ABS. Fact No, 28: For 1994-95, the State of Arkansas forecasted general revenue at $2,527,765,452, including Education Excellence Trust Funds. Of that amount 48.8%, or $1,233,546,155, was spent on the Public School Fund. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 23). 14 -' -'  . 1 __ .. - .. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 29: The Public School Fund provides the primary state financial assistance to Arkansas public elementary and secondary schools. For FY97, the Public School Fund is projected to receive General Revenue funding of $1,261,159,912. The Educational Excellence Trust Fund forecast for the Public School Fund will provide an additional $142,454,921. For FY97, the Public School Fund will receive approximately 47% of the State's Revenue Stabiliz.ation allocations. With Educational Excellence included, the Public School Fund is scheduled to receive 49% of the State's General Revenues (ABS p. 23). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 30: Money is not the only factor which affects the quality of a student's education. Factors other than money which affect the quality of education include (1) the education level of the family, (2) the socioeconomic level of the community, (3) the curriculum, (4) the teachers, (5) the percentage of money going into the classroom as compared to other costs, such as administration and capital expenditures, and ( 6) the course-taken patterns of the students. The Arkansas school funding formula (Act 34) did not take these factors into account in determining the amount of aid available per student. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 130) 15 ADE's Response: Undisputed. While the formula for calculating MFPA did not take these factors into account for purposes of calculating MFP A, other statutes, funding programs and rules and Regulations of the State Board of Education took into account these factors. Fact No, 31: Neither Act 917 nor ,Act 1194 take into account the factors set forth in paragraph 31. ADE's Response: Disputed. Among other things, the new funding scheme includes teacher salary requirements that can affect the \"percentage of money going into the classroom.\" Moreover, because the distribution of equalization funding takes into account the local wealth of the district, it roughly takes into account the \"socioeconomic status of the community.\" Further, as was the case prior to July 1, 1995, there are other existing statutes and rules and Regulations of the State Board of Education that take into account the listed factors. Fact No, 32: There have been no studies to show how much it costs per pupil to provide a \"general, suitable and efficient\" educational opportunity to Arkansas school children. The amount of money spent on a student's education in Arkansas is directly related to the amount of money available to be spent. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 132) ADE's Response: Undisputed. 16 Fact No, 33: Equality does not necessarily mean equal dollars spent per student because some students have greater needs and require more money to educate. Equality means equal access to programs. Differences in money should depend on the cost and the need. High cost students should receive more money. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 133). ADE's Response: To the extent the third and fourth sentences of this \"fact\" are understood to be reffering to the total amount of state, local and federal funds available to and expended by school districts, it is undisputed. Fact No, 34: As part of Act 917, the three districts in Pulaski county will be required to expend state and local revenue on special education students \"in accordance with existing federal and state laws and department regulations\" and based further upon criteria including a formula derived from a three year average percentage. The three districts in Pulaski County have three year average special education expenditures which are more than double those required by Act 917. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 35: Neither the expenditure requirements of Act 917 for special education nor the distribution of aid that could be utilized for special education factor in the actual education expenditures of these three school districts. ADE's Response: This \"fact\" is unintelligible and is therefore disputed. 17 Fact No. 36: Act 917, at Section 3, established four categories of State funding. The first is State Equalization Funding for students. The last category, Category 4, is Student Needs Funding. Section 3 prohibits funding Category 4 until Categories 1, 2 and 3 are fully funded. ADE's Response: Undisputed. ... . Fact No. 37: During its last session, the Arkansas Legislature appropriated $250,000,000 for students (sic) needs funding. However, Section 29 of Act 1194 authorized the Director of the Department of Education to transfer funds from one category to another. The Director has transferred all $250,000,000 from Category 4 to Category 1. There will be no distribution of student needs funding during 1996-97. ADE's Response: Section 29 of Act 1194 authorizes the Director of ADE to request appropriation transfers and other budget-related adjustments with the approval of the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State and after review by the Arkansas Legislative Council. With that qualification, Fact No. 37 is undisputed. The transfer of $250,000 from Category 4 to Category 1 was done because Category 1 was not fully funded and, pursuant to Section 3(a) of Act 917, the $250,000 appropriated for Student Needs Funding could not have been distributed to school districts at all unless it was moved to Category 1. 18  Fact No. 38: Act 917, at Section 4( v) defines Student Needs Funding to include \"[T]he amount of state financial aid provided to each Local School District from available Special Education funding.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. However, section 3(i) of Act 917 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-309(a)) expressly permits school districts to expend Category 1 funds for \"student needs funding.\" Fact No, 39: There are three ways to identify at-risk children within a district: (I) low test scores, (2) the number of children receiving free or reduced lunches within a district, and (3) the number of households below the poverty level within a district. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 137) ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 40: At page 13, the ABS contains the following commentary by the Arkansas Department of Education: \"State Equalization Aid the priority request of$79,255,218 in FY98 and $157,750,338 in FY99 provides for a 6% increase each fiscal year and for the continuation of $5,203,218 budgeted from FY97 fund balances for potential desegregation cost.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 41: At-Risk Grants and Training - Act 917 of 1995 (The Equitable School Finance Act of 1995) and Act 1194 of 1995 (Appropriation Act for the Public School Fund) eliminated at-risk funding as a separate line item and 19 - combined approximately $30 million into the State Equalization Funding fonnula. The Department is requesting that this be established as a line item once more at $17,100,000 each year (ABS p. 23). ADE's Response: Disputed. While the Districts have accurately quoted page 11 of ABS, the statement is incorrect. There are no identifiable or earmarked \"At-Risk Grants and Training\" dollars distributed as state equalization funding. Fact No. 42: Acts 917 and 1194 for 1995 eliminated all at-risk funding from the Department of Education's budget and shifted approximately $30,000,000 into State equalization aid (ABS p. 11) ADE's Response: Disputed. While the Districts have accurately quoted page 11 of ABS, the statement is incorrect. There are no identifiable or eannarked \"At-Risk Grants and Training\" dollars distributed as state equalization funding. Fact No, 43: Act 1194, at Item 28, reflects a $30,000,000 appropriation for at-risk grants and training for 1995-96, the last year that Act 34 operated. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 44: Page 44 of the ABS reflects actual expenditures for at-risk grants and training in 1995-96 of $29,784,239. ADE's Response: Undisputed. 20 . - Fact No, 45: Act 917 defines at-risk funding as \"Financial aid provided to Local School Districts based upon the number of students with low test scores, the number of children receiving free or reduced price lunches, the number of households below the poverty level, or the number of children with limited English proficiency.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 46: Act 1194 appropriated $34,000,000 for at-risk grants and training for 1995-96. There was no appropriation for this category for 1996- 97. ADE's Response: Disputed. See Section 1, Item (28) of Act 1194 of 1995. Fact No, 47: Grants to School Districts - These payments are made to Missouri for educating students in North Arkansas who can't get to their assigned district because Bull Shoals Lake separates them from their district, and it would require a round trip of more than 35 miles. This program was incorporated into the school funding formula, but the Department is requesting a separate line item of$27,000 for the 1997-99 biennium (ABS p. 34). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 48: In Act 1194, $27,000 was appropriated for \"grants to school districts\" for 1995-96, the last year of operation of Act 34. 21 . . # ' . - -- ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 49: Mr. Charles Dyer is Superintendent of the Alma School District. Mr. Dyer was Superintendent of the Alma School District when Alma v, Dupree was tried. It is Mr. Dyer's understanding that moneys previously distributed as MFP A, transportation funds, teacb\"er retirement payments, and health insurance payments, all as previously made under Act 34, were put into one large pool to be distributed pursuant to Act 917. ADE's Response: It is undisputed that Mr. Dyer testified that this is his \"understanding.\" Mr. Dyer's \"understanding,\" however, is incorrect. Moreover, because Mr. Dyer is not a legislator or a state official his ''understanding\" has no probative value concerning the intent of the Arkansas Legislature, and does not bind or estopp the State. Fact No. 50: It is Mr. Dyer's understanding that together with additional money of approximately $60,000,000, that all of this added up to the appropriation of $1,300,000,000. ADE's Response: It is undisputed that Mr. Dyer testified that this is his ''understanding.\" Mr. Dyer's ''understanding,\" however, is incorrect. Moreover, because Mr. Dyer is not a legislator or a state official his ''understanding\" has no probative value concerning the intent of the Arkansas Legislature, and does not bind or estopp the State. 22 Fact No, 51: It is the sworn testimony of Dr. Bobbie Davis that the total dollars that previously went to public schools under Act 34 were all consolidated into equalization funding under Act 917. (Davis deposition, pp. 6-7). ADE's Response: Disputed. The cited testimony related specifically to transportation aid, and Dr. Davis also testified iliat there are no specifically earmarked or identifiable funds for transportation being distributed as equalization funding. Davis Deposition, pp. 6-7. Fact No, 52: 1996 is accurate. Exhibit \"F\" to the Districts' reply dated December 23, ADE's Response: Disputed. See Greene Declaration,~ 2 and 7 and Exh.A. Fact No, 53: Even though the Newark School District will not receive state equalization funding, it will nevertheless receive State aid in the form of additional base funding so that its expenditures per student will be at the minimum level required by the State. ADE's Response: Disputed. The Newark school district will receive additional base funding for 1996-97 because, due to a \"quirk\" in Act 917, Newark's total state and local revenue per ADM for 1996-97 is less than the minimum state and local revenue per ADM as defined by Act 917. See Section 3(e) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-308). As a result of the 23  enactment of Amendment 74 to the Arkansas Constitution, Newark will receive no additional base funding for 1997-98. See Greene Declaration, ,i 3. Fact No. 54: In terms oflocal wealth, Newark is either the richest or second richest school district in the state. ADE's Response: lfthe Districts are defining \"local wealth\" as base local revenue per student calculated at a millage rate of 25 mills, Fact No. 54 is undisputed. Fact No. 55: Newark votes a millage of23.6 mills. This millage rate does not result in an amount of money per student sufficient to satisfy present state expenditure per student requirements. ADE's Response: Disputed. Newark's millage for purposes of 1996-97 state funding was 19.28 mills, and as a result Newark's total state and local revenue per ADM for 1996-97 was less than the minimum state and local revenue per ADM as defined by Act 917. See Section 3(e) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-308). As a result of the ratification of Amendment 74 to the Arkansas Constitution, however, Newark's maintenance and operation millage has been increased to 25 mills and it will receive no additional base funding for 1997-98. See Greene Declaration, ,i 3. Fact No. 56: The three Districts in Pulaski County all vote millages approximately 20 mills higher than the Newark School District. 24 ADE's Response; Disputed, particularly after the effect of millage rollbacks and Amendment 74 are taken into account. See Greene Declaration,, 4. Fact No, 57: The three Districts in Pulaski County vote millages that are among the highest in the State. Only four other districts exceed the millage rate voted in LRSD-and PCSSD. ADE's Response: Disputed. See Greene Declaration,, 4. Fact No, 58: The Umpire School District has one of the smallest student bodies in t "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1662","title":"Court filings concerning summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding, requiring the ODM Monitoring monitoring, NLRSD motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School, and LRSD 1996-97 second quarter status report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Pulaski County Special School District","North Little Rock School District","Seventh Street Elementary School, (North Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School employees","School facilities","School buildings","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School integration","Teachers","Student assistance programs","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding, requiring the ODM Monitoring monitoring, NLRSD motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School, and LRSD 1996-97 second quarter status report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1662"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["114 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) brief in opposition to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) motion for summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding; District Court, declaration of Tristan Greene in opposition to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and NLRSD's motion for summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding; District Court, motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, brief in support of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School; District Court, memorandum; District Court, memorandum opinion and order; District Court, joint motion to postpone argument; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District?s (PCSSD's) request for extension of time; District Court, reply of the Joshua intervenors to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to Joshua intervenors' motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, alternatively, for the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, order; District Court, judgment; District Court, order; District Court, motion for reconsideration; Court of Appeals, motion to dismiss; Court of Appeals, opposition to motion to dismiss; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD) 1996-97 first quarter status report addendum program planning and budget document for desegregation programs and Little Rock School District (LRSD) 1996-97 second quarter status report program planning and budget document for desegregation programs; District Court, two notices of appeal; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, further motion to enlarge time  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FEB 1 S 1897 FILED - - _JLS....OISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CMURllJ DISTRICT ARKANSAS Qfr1Cf. OF DESEGREGATiON MONITORING EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FEB 1 O 1997 WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK By: PLAINTIFF DEP. CLERK v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. FEB 1 8 1997 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD's MOTIONOc\"EGREGAOFFJIOICtl N~FO NITO . FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUES OF 1.:i 1 1 RING HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING I. INTRODUCTION In their motion, which presumably relates solely to the \"issues\" of health insurance matching, special education and loss funding, the Districts level a broad, scattershot attack directed at Acts 917 and 1194 of 1995. These and other new statutes concerning school finance were designed to comply with a State Court's order that requires a funding system that reduces the disparity between the amount of combined state and local funds available to wealthy and poor school districts for the education of children. No matter how it is accomplished, compliance with the State Court's directive to reduce the disparity of available local and state resources between wealthy and poor districts necessarily requires, in one manner or another, that poor school districts be treated somewhat more advantageously in terms of state aid as compared to wealthy districts like the three districts in Pulaski County. As shown in ADE's response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the \"teacher retirement,\" issue, the State chose to enact a new funding system that ensured that all school districts, including the very poorest, had a minimum level of combined state and local funds for the education of children while, at the same time, leaving the three Pulaski County districts unscathed.1 Nonetheless, in what might be viewed by some as a pure \"money grab,\"2 these Districts now argue that while they are ''winners\" under the new funding statutes (in the sense that their total state aid for this year exceeds their total state aid for 1995-96) they deserve even more state aid for 1996-97 because poorer districts in the State got a larger relative increase in state aid than they did. The Districts press this argument without regard to the fact that the Settlement Agreement clearly contemplates that the State can make generally applicable changes to its funding statutes even if the changes 1 LRSD and NLRSD, in particular, have presented no evidence to indicate that they are receiving less state aid this year as compared to last year. Further, neither LRSD nor NLRSD has even argued that it would have received more total state aid for 1996-97 if the old \"Act 34\" funding scheme were still in place. Even if one were to accept the questionable method of comparison used in Exhibit \"F\" to PCSSD's December 23, 1996 Reply brief, PCSSD can only argue that it received $106,579 less state aid for this year as compared to last year. 2 These districts often complain that other school officials throughout the State view these Districts as \"greedy.\" These districts do little to discourage such a view when, as they have done here, they file motions asking this Court to force the State to (a) reimburse them for more than 100% of their actual teacher retirement costs, (b) provide them with the same percentage increase -in state funding as that received by poorer school districts, (c) reimburse them at a rate of$57 per day for students in residential treatment facilities when the facilities themselves will only bill the Districts $44 per day for such students; and ( d) reinstate \"loss funding\" for them when each of the Districts is eligible for and will receive growth funding for 1996-97. 2 - serves to \"reduce the proportion of State aid to any of the Districts.\" Settlement Agreement,  ILL. The question of whether the Settlement Agre,ernent mandates the absurd result these Districts seek is for another day. For now, this Court must address the Districts' motion for summary judgment. As di~russed below, the motion cannot be granted. I. The Motion Must Be Denied Or, In The Alternative, This Court Must Again Abswn Pending Final Resolution Of The Lake View Case In response to the Districts' initial motions to enforce the Settlement Agreement, in which these Districts clearly argued that the new funding statutes - did not comply with the Lake View Court's 1994 orders, ADE requested that this Court abstain until a final judgment was rendered in Lake View. Thereafter, in a \"Preb.earing Brief' filed November 18, 1996, PCSSD essentially withdrew its state law and/or Lake View compliance claims, saying that the Districts only wished to pursue issues \"separate and distinct from the constitutional and compliance issues raised\" in Lake View. The Districts now appear to have changed their minds; they again ask this Court to intrude upon the Lake View court's jurisdiction and/or evaluate the new funding system under state law. See 1he Districts' Brief in Support of this motion at p. 5: \"[H]ad Judge Imber ruled on the new formula, she would have found the 3 - changes objectionable and neither fair, rational, nor reasonable under the State constitutional rational basis test.\" The Districts' attempt to litigate state law issues in this Court must be summarily rejected. Under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution this Court lacks jurisdiction to fore~ state officials to comply with state law, even if the state law claim is pendent to a federal law claim. Pennhurst State School \u0026 Hosp. v. Halderman, 79 L.Ed.2d 67, 92 (1984). Moreover, even if this Court could exercise some concurrent federal jurisdiction over Lake View compliance issues, ADE renews its request that this Court abstain from considering the Districts' motions pending a final judgment in the Lake View case. II. Summary Judgment Is Inappropriate Because There Are Numerous Disputed Issues Of Material Fact In ruling on the Districts' motions for summary judgment this Court may not resolve disputed factual issues, but rather must simply determine as an initial matter whether any material facts are in dispute. As outlined more fully in ADE's response to the Districts' Separate Statement Of Undisputed Facts, there are numerous issues of material fact in dispute. Accordingly, the Districts' motion must be denied. 4 m. Health Insurance and Special Education For the same reasons the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of teacher retirement must be denied, this motion as it relates to health insurance and special education must also be denied. The Districts have failed to present any admissible evidence showing the effect, if any, that the elimination of the \"weighting\" system for special education funding has had on them, nor have they cited this Court to any provision of the Settlement Agreement that requires the State to maintain some form of''weighting\" system for special education students. Further, the District's newly-raised claim concerning the State's per diem reimbursement rate for children in residential treatment centers must be - dismissed for lack of a justiciable case or controversy. It is undisputed that all of the residential treatment facilities within the Districts have agreed to charge the Districts, at most, the per diem rate of reimbursement established by the State for 1996-97. In short, the State continues to fund 100% of the per diem rate for children in residential treatment centers as it did in 1995-96. Unless and until that situation changes, there is not even arguably a case or controversy for this Court to resolve. IV. Loss Funding The Districts' attempt to resurrect loss funding must fail for three basic reasons. 5 First, loss funding has not been completely eliminated. The new funding scheme has retained a \"loss funding\" feature. Under Act 917, a district's current year's equalization funding is based upon the prior year's ADM, thereby giving any district with declining ADM a one-year period of continued funding to enable it to \"adjust\" to the drop in enrollment. Second, the Districts, who bear the burden of proof, have supplied no evidence whatsoever to support their argument that the elimination of loss funding will cause their students to leave for adjoining school districts. There are many reasons why enrollment might decline in these Districts, reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with \"loss funding\" or \"growth funding;\" and not all students that leave the Pulaski County Districts go on to attend school in the surrounding counties. For example, parents may choose to move their children to private schools within the County when they become fed up with the effects of a teacher strike and a school district's inability to come to terms with its teachers. Enrollment may decline due in part to changing demographics, such as an increase in the average age of a district's inhabitants and a concomitantly lower birth rate. Some students leave when their parents move elsewhere in the State or even out of State to take advantage of lower crime rates or better job opportunities. The Districts' argument that the elimination of loss funding causes them to lose students is not only a non sequitor, it flies in the face of Dr. Don Stewart's 6 - testimony in September of 1994 that parents do not decide to take their students out of PCS SD schools based upon the existence or nonexistence ofloss funding or growth funding for PCSSD or any other district. Third, in a crowning bit of irony, all three of the Pulaski County Districts are eligible for and will receive growth funding for 1996-97. The Districts' argument that the Settlement Agreement requires the \"reinstatement\" ofloss funding under these circumstances is plainly frivolous. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, ADE respectfully requests that the Districts' motion be denied. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General BY:~ TIMO .GR,#95019 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center St., Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for Arkansas Department of Education 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this 10th day of February, 1997 by first-class mail, to the following person(s): M. Samuel Jones III WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 425 W. Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 8 John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. .J. 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Richard Roachell ROACHELL \u0026 STREET 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. TIIO1\\.1PSON \u0026 LLEWELLYN 412 S. 18th Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 FILED FEB 1 8 1997 OFflCE Of DESEGREGATION MONITORING u.s OIHRICT cou~T EA~Tcou \"'C:Tn~T ~ ,,...,  .. ,c:,a.~ INTIIElJNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F-B 1 O 1997 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS t . \" WESTERN DMSION JM~[:; W. MClJUl'\\IVl\"\\JI\\, liL.:.RK. By: ___ --:::01'-::-, ::-:-CL;:;;-ER:;--~ LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS DECLARATION OF TRISTAN GREENE IN OPPOSITION TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUES OF HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING I, Tristan D. Greene. declare as follows: 1. I have been the Assistant to the Assistant Director for Finance and Administration for the Arkansas Department of Education since April of 1995. During the course of my work for ADE, I have become familiar with the laws and regulations conrem.ing the system of public school finance in Arkansas, and, in particular, the operation of and calculation of state aid outcomes under the State's prior school funding statutes and under the school funding statutes enacted by the Arkansas General Assembly during the 1995 legislative session. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are ADE's December 27, 1996 printouts reflecting projected State Aid for LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD for 1996- 97, based on 1995-96 three quarter average ADM and adjusted for growth in the 1  - 1996-97 first quarter. Unless one of these Districts reports (a) a clerical error in its previous year's attendance reports, or (b) an error in its abstract of assessment, or (c) an error in its previous year's miscellaneous funds, or (d) a clerical error in its scheduled bonded debt payment or ( e) an error in its 1996-97 first quarter attendance report, the amounts reflected in the ~ecember 27, 1996 printouts will accurately reflect the amount of regular state aid distributed to the three Districts for 1996-97. Among other things, these printouts show: a. LRSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 247.74, and LRSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 744,183 for 1996-97; b. PCSSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 27.02, and PCSSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 81,165 for 1996-97; and c. NLRSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 140.79, and NLRSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 422,917 for 1996-97. 3. Due to a .. quirk\" in the new funding formula that did not require the Newark School District to raise its millage rate (Section 7(f) of Act 917), the Newark School District will receive approximately $27,000 in Additional Base Funding for 1996-97. However, because Newark's millage has now increased due 2  - to the enactment of Amendment 7 4 to the Arkansas Constitution, and assuming that the operative provisions of Act 917 are not materially altered during the 1997 legislative session, Newark will receive no Additional Base Funding for 1997-98. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a ranking of school districts by total voted millage on taxable real property, which repects such millage rates in effect in each district as of September, 1996. It shows that four districts have higher total voted millages on real property rates than LRSD. However, after the millage rollbacks pursuant to Amendment 59 of the Arkansas Constitution are taken into account, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD will fall in the ranking. 5. Using information supplied by the Child Nutrition section of ADE - and October, 1996 ADM figures, I have prepared a table showing the number of students eligible for free and reduced-price meals in each school district in Arkansas ( as of October, 1996) and the concentration of such students in each district expressed as a percentage of October 1996 ADM. The table is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 6. Using information derived from the 1990 Federal Decennial Census, I have prepared a ranking of school districts by the percentage of households in each district that are below the 1989 poverty level. The ranking is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 3 7. I have reviewed Exhibit \"F' to the Districts' December 23, 1996 Reply Brief. It is incorrect Among other things, on the first page of Exhibit \"F\" the third column purports to show a \"1996-97 M-M adjustment\" of state aid that to my knowledge will not be made by ADE. Moreover, Exhibit F is methodologically unsound in that it purports to be a comparison of revenue PCS SD received from the State or paid by the State on behalf of PCS SD in 1995- 96 and 1996-97, and yet columns 2 and 3 of page l of Exhibit F purports to add a district cost into the equation. On page 2 of Exhibit Fan incorrect \"1995-96 3Q ADM'' figure is listed. 8. In my declaration filed December 13, 1996, I erroneously stated that - the Table Rate used to calculate M-M incentive funding for the three Districts for 1995-96 was: LRSD: $ 977.28; PCSSD: $ 1889.51; and NLRSD: $ 1686.21. While those were the correct Table Rates that were used to calculate ordinary state aid in 1995-96, the Table Rates used to calculate M-M incentive funding were as follows: LRSD: $ 1064.96; PCSSD: $ 1904.18; and NLRSD: $ 1695.42. 9. The photocopied table from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette attached to the Districts' brief does not contain accurate information. Assuming the newspaper accurately reported information that may have been provided by ADE, the table at best reflects 1996-97 state aid estimates made on or before the end of June, 1996. Actual 1996-97 state aid calculations differ. For example: 4 (a) Compare PCSSD's 1995-96 K-12 three quarter average ADM reflected on Exhibit A hereto (20,025.77) with the \"students\" figure for PCSSD in the newspaper table (20,080); (b) Compare the total ofNLRSD's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding, General Facilities Funding, Debt Serv~e Supplement Payment and Growth Facilities funding as reflected on Exhibit A hereto($ 23,784,504) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for NLRSD ($ 23,697,999); (c) Compare the total ofLRSD's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding as reflected on Exhibit A hereto($ 41,530,927) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for LRSD ($41,513,676); and (d) Compare the total of the Lake View School District's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding, General Facilities Funding and Debt Service Supplemental Payment ($ 706,648) as reflected in Lake View's December 27, 1996 printout (attached hereto as Exhibit E) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for Lake View($ 709,486). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of February, 1997, at Little Rock, Arkansas .. 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this 10th day of February, 1997 by first-class mail, to the following person(s): M. Samuel Jones Ill WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Christopher Heller FRIDAY., ELDREDGE\u0026 CLARK 425 W. Capitol, Suite2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 grccndc2.doc John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. -. 1723 Broadway -.. little Rock., AR 72206 Richard Roachell ROACHELL \u0026 STREET 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504  Little Rock, AR 72201 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. THOMPSON \u0026 LLEWELLYN 412 S. 18th Street P.O.Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 /e-~ - ' ~ ~ Timothy G.Qr 6 - (_ STATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-01 COUNTY: PULASKI l. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12. 1ST QTR) 2. REAL PROPERTY AN S 1.185.286.533.00 75% MISC FUNDS $102.158.00 DISTRICT: Little Rock 22,231 .64 ~ 22,47938 . PERSONAL PROPERTY AN $444,714.987.00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AVAILABLE 39.82 3. 4. 5. TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT .6. W7. ( . 8. 9. BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING PER STUDENT 1996-97 ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING \"\" 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. _18. 19. 20. 21. AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL F ACILlTIES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING ISOLA TED AJD CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILlTIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST A TE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 ST ATE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 STA TE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING  EXHIBIT ' ' A UTILITY PROPERTY AN $82.309.700.00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX -0.01259 $ s s s s $ s s s $ $ $ $ $ $ s s $ $ 42.053. 782.00 1.891.62 3.759.72 1.868.10 41.530.927.00 41.530.927.00 4.025.593.00 0.00 744.183.00 0.00 0.00 66.956.758.00 42.275. I I 0.00 4,859.20 3,887.36 0.00 STATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-02 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRlCT: N. Little Rock 1. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12. 1ST QTR) 8.982.18 9..122.97 .. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. - 7. ( 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. REAL PROPERTY AN $301.59).503.00 75% MISC FUNDS $12.655.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY AN SI 00,003.317 .00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AV Al LAB LE 39.37 TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST ATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING PER STUDENT 1996-97 STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL FACILITIES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING JSOLA TED AID CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILITIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST A TE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 STA TE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOTAL LOCAL\u0026 STATE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING UTILITY PROPERTY AN $23.8 I 6.6 79 .00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX 0.55281 s $ s s s $ $ s $ $ s $ $ s s s s s s I 0.435.236.00 1.161.77 3.759.72 2.597.95 .23.335.255.00 .23.335.255.00 .2.261.886.00 173.790.00 4::?2.917.00 190.733.00 84.726.00 16,430.355.00 13.931.962.00 4.424.25 3.887.36 0.00 ST ATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-03 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: Pulaski Co. Spec. 1. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12, JSTQTR) 20,025.77 20,052.79  2. ... .J. 4. 5. 6. .7. (8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. REAL PROPERTY AN $558,008,639.00 75% MISC FUNDS $73.473.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY AN S 190.866. I 69.00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AV AI LAB LE 41.04 TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST A TE EQUALIZA TJON FUNDING PER STUDENT I 996-97 ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL F ACILITJES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING ISOLATED AID CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILITIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST ATE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOTAL LOCAL \u0026 ST ATE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 ST A TE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING UTILITY PROPERTY AN $3 7. 720.003.00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX 0.65422 $ s $ $ $ $ s s s $ s s $ $ s $ s s $ 19.345.045.00 966.01 3.759.72 2.793.71 55.946.194.00 55.946.194.00 5.422.865.00 458.544.00 81.165.00 614.706.00 0.00 31.734.178.00 56.485.903 .00 4,399.39 3.887.36 0.00 . ' \\ 1 HOWARD 2 UNION 3 UNION .t WASHINGTON \u0026 PULASKI 6 PULASKI 7. UNION t 8 DESHA 9 PULASKI 10 FAULKNER \\ 11 UNION 12 UNION 13 COLUMBIA 14 POINSETT 15 SEBASTIAN 16 GRANT 17 MILLER 18 IZARD 19 SEBASTIAN 20 MILLER 21 BOONE 22 FAULKNER - 23 FAULKNER 24 MILLER 25 BOONE 26 JEFFERSON 27 RANDOLPH 28 BAXTER 29 WASHINGTON 30 LONOKE 31 UNION 32 BENTON 33 SALINE 34 JACKSON 35 GARLAND 36 CLARK 37 HOT SPRING 38 SEBASTIAN 39 CRITTENDEN 40 HOT SPRING 41 SEBASTIAN 42 SALINE 43 FAULKNER 44 HOWARD 45 GARLAND 46 MARION 47 CRAWFORD -  48 BENTON 49 SEARCY 50 POPE 51 BENTON 52 BENTON , 33 JEFFERSON RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST UMPIRE 56.40 HUTTIG 34.30 MT HOLLY 44.00 FAYETTEVILLE 17.30 PULASKJ CO SPEC 34.00 LITTLE ROCK 27.80 UNION 21.80 ARKANSAS CITY ~ 35.00 NO LITTLE ROCK 29.40 GUY-PERKINS  6.40 SMACKOVER 24.70 STRONG 25.70 WALKER 8.10 WEINER 36.40 HARTFORD* 22.20 POYEN 36.20 GENOA CENTRAL 20.70 CALICO ROCK 21.00 HACKETT 13.00 TEXARKANA 16.30 OMAHA 24.60 VILONIA 25.90 MT.VERNON/ENOLA 33.00 FOUKE 12.10 LEAD HILL 32.00 WHITEHALL 24.90 BIGGERS-REYNO 28.00 COTTER 37.00 ELKINS 15.90 HUMNOKE 18.00 NORPHLET 10.20 PEA RIDGE 16.10 BAUXITE 26.50 SWIFTON 34.85 LAKESIDE 13.30 ARKADELPHIA 22.60 MAGNET COVE 28.00 FORT SMITH 33.30 EARLE 19.60 GLEN ROSE 20.30 GREENWOOD 14.90 HARMONY GROVE 10.40 CONWAY 14.80 DIERKS 24.60 HOT SPRINGS 8.20 MARION CO 19.60 VAN BUREN 13.60 SILOAM SPRS 16.30 WITTS SPRINGS  6.10 POTTSVILLE 35.70 BENTONVILLE 7.66 ROGERS 17.00 PINE BLUFF 13.10 Page 1 EXHIBIT B 2.00 58.40 19.30 53.60 5.80 49.80 3.00 23.70 44.00 9.90 43.90 1.00 15.10 43.90 0.00 21.20 43.00 1.00 6.50 42.50 3.00 9.50 41.90 3.00 31.60 41.00 16.30 41.00 15.20 40.90 31.90 40.00 3.50 39.90 17.10 39.30 3.00 39.20 18.50 39.20 18.00 39.00 26.00 39.00 3.00 19.60 38.90 2.00 11.50 38.10 12.10 38.00 5.00 38.00 2.00 23.90 38.00 6.00 38.00 12.80 37.70 3.00 6.50 37.50 37.00 1.70 19.40 37.00 19.00 37.00 2.00 24.80 37.00 20.90 37.00 10.30 36.80 1.80 36.65 2.00 21.30 36.60 2.00 11.90 36.50 8.50 36.50 2.50 0.70 36.50 3.00 13.60 36.20 15.80 36.10 21.20 36.10 25.60 36.00 21.20 36.00 2.00 9.40 36.00 27.80 36.00 16.30 35.90 22.30 35.90 1.50 18.00 35.80 3.00 26.70 35.80 35.70 28.00 35.66 1.00 17.30 35.30 I 1.00 21.20 35.30 54 BENTON 55 WASHINGTON 56 WOODRUFF 57 BENTON 58 DALLAS 59 WASHINGTON 60 PIKE 61 WASHINGTON 62 CRAWFORD 63 OUACHITA 64 NEVADA 65 ARKANSAS 66 YELL 67 INDEPENDENCE 68 LONOKE 69 CLEBURNE 70 SALINE 71 POPE 72 PIKE 73 POLK 74 DREW 75 PIKE - 76 CHICOT 77 COLUMBIA 78 GARLAND 79 CLEBURNE 80 CRAIGHEAD 81 INDEPENDENCE 82 POLK 83 OUACHITA 84 UNION 85 WASHINGTON 86 JOHNSON 87 JOHNSON 88 FRANKLIN 89 LOGAN 90 COLUMBIA 91 DREW 92 CLARK 93 YELL 94 LAFAYETTE 95 LINCOLN 96 UNION 97 FAULKNER 98 WASHINGTON 99 POLK 100 HEMPSTEAD - 101 LITTLE R.IVER 102 WASHINGTON 103. JEFFERSON 104 LOGAN 105 YELL 106 FULTot-: RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST DECATUR 19.00 SPRINGDALE 18.20 COTTON PLANT 20.00 GENTRY 18.70 SPARKMAN 33.60 WEST FORK 9.10 CENTERPOINT 6.70 LINCOLN .. 14.70 ALMA 14.20 BEARDEN 7.10 NEVADA CO 4.70 GILLETT 9.00 DARDANELLE 28.10 CUSHMAN* 9.80 LONOKE 13.35 QUITMAN 20.40 PARON 15.60 ATKINS 25.40  DELIGHT 13.36 ACORN 17.40 DREW CENTRAL 26.10 MURFREESBORO 23.90 LAKESIDE 20.80 EMERSON 19.10 LAKE HAMIL TON 32.40 HEBER SPRINGS 11.27 BROOKLAND 17.90 SULPHUR ROCK 14.70 HATFIELD 20.00 CAMDEN/FAIRVIEW 22.50 JUNCTION CITY 16.00 WINSLOW 31.00 CLARKSVILLE * 15.30 OARK* 9.90 PLEASANT VIEW 25.00 BOONEVILLE 17.00 TAYLOR 12.90 MONTICELLO 15.10 GURDON 20.00 OLA 24.50 LEWISVILLE 12.20 GRADY 21.80 PARKERS CHAPEL 26.70 GREENBRIER 21.60 GREENLAND 21.70 WICKES 14.30 SPRING HILL* 17.20 ASHDOWN 7.00 PRAIRIE GROVE 20.50 AL THEIMER UNIFIED 14.60 PARIS* 15.50 PLAINVIEW-ROVER 17.04 SALEM 16.23 Page2 16.20 35.20 16.90 35.10 15.00 35.00 16.30 35.00 1.40 35.00 25.90 35.00 28.30 35.00 3.00 17.30 35.00 20.80 35.00 27.80 34.90 30.20 34.90 25.80 34.80 3.00 3.60 34.70 24.70 34.50 3.00 18.05 34.40 14.00 34.40 3.00 15.70 34.30 8.80 34.20 3.00 17.80 34.16 3.00 13.60 34.00 7.90 34.00 3.00 7.10 34.00 2.00 11.20 34.00 14.80 33.90 1.50 33.90 3.00 19.53 33.80 1.00 14.80 33.70 18.90 33.60 13.40 33.40 3.00 7.70 33.20 17.00 33.00 2.00 33.00 1.40 16.30 33.00 2.00 21.10 33.00 8.00 33.00 16.00 33.00 20.10 33.00 1.00 16.90 33.00 1.00 12.00 33.00 8.50 33.00 3.00 17.60 32.80 11.00 32.80 6.10 32.80 2.00 9.10 32.70 11.00 32.70 1.20 17.20 32.70 3.00 12.50 32.70 25.60 32.60 2.00 10.10 32.60 17.80 32.40 16.90 32.40 15.30 32.34 16.00 32.23 RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST 107 LOGAN SCRANTON* 15.32 16.90 32.22 \\ 108 CRITTENDEN TURRELL 8.67 23.50 32.17 109 MARION YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 15.21 3.00 13.80 32.01 110 MONTGOMERY ODEN 21.60 10.40 32.00 111 CRAWFORD MOUNTAINBURG 19.60 2.00 10.40 32.00 112 HOWARD MINERAL SPRINGS 10.40 2.10 19.50 32.00 113 IZARD IZARD COUNTY 15.00 17.00 32.00 11, NEWTON DEER : 12.20 2.70 17.10 32.00 115 CONWAY NEMOVISTA 7.80 3.00 21.20 32.00 116 IZARD MELBOURNE* 5.80 2.00 24.20 32.00 117 WOODRUFF MCCRORY 32.00 32.00 118 BAXTER NORFORK 14.00 18.00 32.00 119 JOHNSON WESTSIDE 12.00 20.00 32.00 120 LINCOLN STAR CITY 19.20 2.00 10.80 32.00 121 CLEVELAND KINGSLAND 9.90 3.00 19.10 32.00 122 DALLAS CARTHAGE 32.00 32.00 123 CROSS WYNNE 9.90 3.00 19.10 32.00 124 GARLAND FT.LAKE 20.00 3.00 9.00 32.00 125 DESHA DUMAS 31.90 31.90 126 LAWRENCE LYNN 19.00 3.00 9.80 31.80 127 POLK VAN COVE 24.10 2.00 5.70 31.80 128 JEFFERSON WATSON CHAPEL 24.30 3.00 4.50 31.80 - 129 CARROLL EUREKASPR 11.25 0.50 20.00 31.75 130 CROSS CROSS COUNTY 8.90 2.00 20.80 31.70 131 CLEVELAND RISON 8.30 2.00 21.40 31.70 132 WHITE SEARCY 19.90 1.00 10.80 31.70 133 VAN BUREN SHIRLEY 12.00 0.00 19.60 31.60 134 INDEPENDENCE BA TES VILLE * 14.75 1.00 15.80 31.55 135 WASHINGTON FARMINGTON 13.90 17.50 31.40 136 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 25.50 5.90 31.40 137 HEMPSTEAD SARATOGA 10.20 1.42 19.70 31.32 138 PHILLIPS LAKEVIEW 8.30 23.00 31.30 139 BAXTER MT. HOME 16.20 15.10 31.30 140 STONE RURAL SPECIAL 23.20 8.10 31.30 141 CLEBURNE WILBURN 16.90 2.00 12.40 31 .30 142 HEMPSTEAD BLEVINS 12.40 18.90 31.30 143 JEFFERSON OOLLARWAY 11.38 19.90 31.28 144 FRANKLIN OZARK* 13.10 18.10 31.20 145 WHITE BALD KNOB 7.90 23.30 31.20 146 HOWARD NASHVILLE 23.00 0.50 7.70 31.20 147 GARLAND JESSIEVILLE 15.80 15.30 31.10 148 PHILLIPS HELENA W-HELE 9.55 21.50 31.05 149 LONOKE CABOT 9.30 1.00 20.70 31.00 150 GARLAND CUTTER MORNING 14.00 2.00 15.00 31.00 151 CHICOT EUDORA 14.50 3.00 13.50 31.00 152 LONOKE CARLISLE 20.40 2.00 8.60 31.00 153 FRANKLIN CHARLESTON 22.50 1.00 7.50 31.00  154 YELL WESTERN YELL 19.00 1.90 10.10 31.00 155 YELL DANVILLE 11 .00 20.00 31.00 156 LAWRENCE RIVER VALLEY 22.00 2.00 7.00 31.00 157 LONOKE ENGLAND 16.93 3.00 11.00 30.93 158 CRITTENDEN MARION 9.10 21.80 30.90 159 SHARP WILLIFORD* 17.00 3.00 10.90 30.90 Page 3 160 VAN BUREN 161 GARLAND 162 SEVIER 163 ASHLEY 164 INDEPENDENCE 165 MILLER 166 CONWAY 167 RANDOLPH 168 NEWTON 169 SEBASTIAN 170 RANDOLPH 171 CRAIGHEAD 172 POLK 173 SALINE 174 GRANT 175 CRAIGHEAD 176 POINSETT 177 ASHLEY 178 CRAWFORD 179 MADISON 180 CONWAY 181 CHICOT - 182 BOONE 183 CRAIGHEAD -- 184 GREENE 185 OUACHITA 186 WHITE 187 CLAY 188 CRAIGHEAD 189 MISSISSIPPI 190 POPE 191 HEMPSTEAD 192 PRAIRIE 193 PERRY 194 MONROE 195 GREENE 196 WHITE 197 MADISON 198 CLEBURNE 199 LOGAN - 200 CRAWFORD 201 VAN BUREN 202 DALLAS 203 POINSETT 204 GREENE 205 FRANKLIN 206 FAULKNER - "}],"pages":{"current_page":15,"next_page":16,"prev_page":14,"total_pages":35,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":168,"total_count":419,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":418},{"value":"StillImage","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":60},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":42},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":23},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":5},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"Arkansas Policy Foundation","hits":2},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":2},{"value":"Quality Education and Management Associates","hits":2},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":419},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":413},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":307},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":287},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":280},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":229},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":204},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":174},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Student assistance programs","hits":139},{"value":"School integration","hits":138}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":417},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":415},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":411},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":405},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Phillips County, 34.42829, -90.84802","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Connecticut, 41.66704, -72.66648","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Maryland, 39.00039, -76.74997","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Michigan, 44.25029, -85.50033","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":415},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Missouri","hits":1},{"value":"Texas","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1995","hits":88},{"value":"1993","hits":74},{"value":"1994","hits":74},{"value":"1996","hits":72},{"value":"1992","hits":64},{"value":"1999","hits":59},{"value":"2001","hits":59},{"value":"1997","hits":58},{"value":"1991","hits":53},{"value":"2003","hits":53},{"value":"2000","hits":52},{"value":"1990","hits":40},{"value":"1998","hits":40},{"value":"2004","hits":40},{"value":"2002","hits":38},{"value":"1989","hits":33},{"value":"2005","hits":31},{"value":"2006","hits":21},{"value":"1986","hits":10},{"value":"1988","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"2007","hits":8},{"value":"2008","hits":8},{"value":"1987","hits":7},{"value":"2010","hits":7},{"value":"1985","hits":6},{"value":"2009","hits":6},{"value":"2011","hits":6},{"value":"1980","hits":5},{"value":"1981","hits":5},{"value":"1982","hits":5},{"value":"1983","hits":5},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"2012","hits":4},{"value":"1950","hits":3},{"value":"1951","hits":3},{"value":"1952","hits":3},{"value":"1953","hits":3},{"value":"1954","hits":3},{"value":"1955","hits":3},{"value":"1956","hits":3},{"value":"1957","hits":3},{"value":"1958","hits":3},{"value":"1959","hits":3},{"value":"1960","hits":3},{"value":"1961","hits":3},{"value":"1962","hits":3},{"value":"1963","hits":3},{"value":"1964","hits":3},{"value":"1965","hits":3},{"value":"1966","hits":3},{"value":"1967","hits":3},{"value":"1968","hits":3},{"value":"1969","hits":3},{"value":"1970","hits":3},{"value":"1971","hits":3},{"value":"1972","hits":3},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"2013","hits":3},{"value":"2014","hits":3},{"value":"2015","hits":2},{"value":"2016","hits":2},{"value":"2017","hits":2},{"value":"2018","hits":2},{"value":"2019","hits":2},{"value":"2020","hits":2},{"value":"2021","hits":2},{"value":"2022","hits":2},{"value":"2023","hits":2},{"value":"2024","hits":2},{"value":"2025","hits":2},{"value":"2026","hits":2},{"value":"1910","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1910","max":"2026","count":1175,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":237},{"value":"filing","hits":81},{"value":"reports","hits":71},{"value":"correspondence","hits":10},{"value":"handbooks","hits":9},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":7},{"value":"planning","hits":5},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":1},{"value":"booklets","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":417},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Photographs Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":418},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":419}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}