{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1067","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2005-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1067"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["72 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nJA JAN 2 2005 TORING Agenda F NITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting :- n \u0026gt;-c ~ ~ -\u0026lt;O: I: oz ::o\u0026gt; ~~ ::o-,, -c:: ::oz o.....n... .-5 nz )\u0026gt;(J) .......... ::e\n= rm-: :-oc no On l:m mo -c:: ~~ ~ ..... 0~ ::0 =1 ~m z::o n\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; m-fD n n =l ,....mN\noz n\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; ..,.::o m ~ ::0\nJI\ntJ\u0026gt; :\u0026lt; ::0 \u0026gt; qi  0 CD ::0 o-\u0026lt; )\u0026gt;\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; :o:on\ni:O m:I:\ni: 3: CD C:: :m:o~n \u0026lt;J\u0026gt;.).\u0026gt;. 0 z tJ\u0026gt; I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING January 27, 2005 5:30 o.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - M. L. King Elementary School Choir Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: V. A. Remarks from Board Members B. Entry Plan Executive Summary Report to the Board C. Report on Superintendent's Aspiring Principals Institute D. Student Assignment Report E. Budget Update F. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects G. Internal Auditors Report H. Technology Update APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Special Meeting - 12-08-04 Regular Meeting - 12-16-04 Special Meeting - 01-13-05 ,... n )\u0026gt;\"D ~~ -\u0026lt;- 031: oz\no\u0026gt; ~~\no.., -c:\noz ,o-n... ,- 0 nz ,\u0026gt;-en ,- :E\n= ,m- -\nco gg 3C m mo -c:\n:g~ il:l ,- 0 ~\no =I ~m z\no n en m- :\u0026lt;\no ,,.qi  o CD\no o-\u0026lt; ,..cn\noon ~~ 3C 3C ~~\non en\u0026gt;... 0 z en Regular Board Meeting January 27, 2005 Page 2 VI. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember IX. ADJOURNMENT ~ n )\u0026gt; \"'0 ,\n---,~- -e\u0026lt;ll-: oz\n0 )\u0026gt; ~~\n0.., - C:\n0 z o....n... ,- 0 nz ,)\u0026gt;- Cf\u0026gt; ,- ~ := m\"'O h\na 00\ni:~ me -c: c~l:1~,- 0~\n0 =1 ~m z\n0 OCf\u0026gt; m- :\u0026lt;\n0 m )\u0026gt; \"'0  0 a,\n0 o-\u0026lt; )\u0026gt; Cf\u0026gt; ~c=\n~~\ni: 3: ~~\na n Cf\u0026gt; .).\u0026gt;.. 0z Cf\u0026gt; I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. CITIZENS REMARKS C. LR CTA IV. REPORTS / COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: January 27, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Entry Plan Executive Summary Report to the Board of Education BACKGROUND: The Superintendent's Entry Plan: A New Beginning provided a step-by-step guide to the First 100 Days of my Superintendency. The attached executive summary provides a brief overview of progress made in implementing the plan and establishing a means to communicate effectively with LRSD staff and community. RATIONALE: To provide a clear direction for implementation of necessary change as identified by the Board of Directors, teachers, building administrators and others in the community who are supportive of significant progress toward reaching the established goals and improving student achievement in the Little Rock School District. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: I ask the Board to accept the report as presented. In addition, I would ask that you provide feedback for progressing beyond the First 100 Days in order to establish guidelines for future positive Board-Superintendent relationship. PREPARED BY: Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of Schools\n:,o ~ ~ .~ m\n:,o z ,\u0026gt;- \u0026gt; C 0 3 !=' \"....'. C 0 mz ..... \u0026gt; !:l c'i z 31: m ~ !'\" a, C 0 C') m..... C\ng .\u0026gt;.... m =\"' a:,O oo zZ o\"' \"C :-'\n:,o\n:,o om 'm- \"oC .O...\n.:..,.o.. \"' Executive Summary Report to the Board of Education Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. January, 2005 Superintendent's Entry Plan A New Beginning EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUPERINTENDENT'S ENTRY PLAN FIRST 100 DAYS As we begin the 2005 calendar year, I wanted to provide you with an executive summary of the Superintendent's Entry Plan which encompassed my first 100 days as superintendent of the Little Rock School District. Every School Board member had significant involvement in the successful implementation of the Entry Plan, and for that I thank you. As you know, I made a commitment to visit every school in the district during my first 100 days, and I accomplished that goal. I visited some schools as many as ten times, while I visited other schools just once or twice. The school and department site visits allowed me to hear  directly from staff members about their concerns, challenges and hopes for the district. The interaction was very positive, and some employees told me they were surprised to see me, and were pleased to have an opportunity to express their opinions and advice. The breakfast and lunch meetings at four schools and four administrative sites allowed me to visit in person with more than 300 staff members. Additionally, the community forums, neighborhood coffees, and meetings with teachers, ministers, business leaders, PT A Council and Superintendent's Student Cabinet enabled me to hear from another 900 interested citizens. I have compiled the comments and suggestions provided at all of these meetings and will consider them carefully as we continue our efforts to improve our schools. Some of the issues that were repeated most often related to accountability\nstudent achievement\ncurriculum\nleadership stability\nparent and community involvement\nschool choice options\nWest Little Rock school\nstudent discipline and attendance\nequitable funding\nteacher attendance\nclass size\nlack of materials, books and other resources\nneighborhood issues such as boarded-up houses near schools\ncustomer service\nextended year education\nalternative schools\nportable classrooms\nsite-based management\nschool renovation and maintenance needs\ntechnology assistance\nESL resources\nand lack of adequate professional development. Additionally, I asked the Superintendent's Student Cabinet, PTA Council and Teachers of the Year to complete a brief survey. This input was helpful to me and will be incorporated with notes from the public meetings, and taken into consideration during the development of the organizational audit recommendations. The time and energy invested in the Superintendent's Entry Plan has paid greater dividends than I anticipated. Not only did I receive extremely valuable input during the process, but I also came away with a better understanding of the perceptions of parents, employees and community residents toward our schools. I heard overwhelming support and countless endorsements of the work that our teachers are doing in the classroom. I have great respect for our teachers and for their professionalism and dedication to providing the very best for all our students. I learned that there is a broad base of community support for our schools, and that people are willing to help us address our problems and work with us to develop solutions. I trust that you will agree with me that the Entry Plan has been helpful as a communications tool and that the comments we have gathered will guide us toward achieving the goal of increasing student achievement and improving the climate and academic culture of our schools. !=' !!l C: 0 .zm.. . \u0026gt; en en 1z5\ni:: .zm.. . !TI a, C: 0 C\u0026gt; .m... C: \"C 0 ~ m :\"' a, n oo zZ o en \"C ~ :o:0m::0 'm- \"oC n::o\nl-\u0026lt; DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 January 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute BACKGROUND: District data reveals that 26% of the current building principals have between 26-30 years of experience\nanother 26% have 31 years of experience or more, resulting in 52% of the current principals who are eligible to retire. With such possibility of employee retirements ahead, it has become necessary and critical to begin training aspiring principals to fill forthcoming vacancies. To this end, the Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute has been revitalized with significant and improved changes. Efforts have begun to identify candidates who will participate in the Institute over the next year. RATIONALE: The Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute has been specifically designed to prepare, train, and hire individuals who will serve our schools with a paradigm of new leadership. The lnstitute's purpose will be to prepare an in-house cadre of emerging leaders who can provide a seamless transition into building leadership with necessary confidence and skills. Through the Institute, these leaders will acquire extensive knowledge concerning research-based and common sense practices to facilitate school improvement, develop an understanding of building culture and enhance student achievement. FUNDING: The cost for the Institute has been shared between School Services and Title II funds. RECOMMENDATION: A presentation will be made at the January Board meeting in order to share with you the lnstitute's process, intended program, and the identified candidates who will be participating. PREPARED BY: Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent Dr. Lloyd Sain, Coordinator of Leadership Development\ni: .... m C') C:J: -.iz 00 ~8 -\u0026lt; !=' !!l C 0 m .z.. . \u0026gt; ~ C) z\ni: m .z.. . =\" CD C'l oO zZ o en .,,:-\u0026lt;\no\no om '- .,, mo .C.'.). .\n.o.. en The Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute - Board Report \"Transforming Schools Through Instructional Leadership and Preparation\" Prepared by Dr. Lloyd Sain, Coordinator of Leadership Development Submitted to Dr. Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services Steering Committee Members Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent - School Services Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent - Student Discipline Dr. Olivine Roberts, Associate Superintendent - Curriculum Division Frances Jones, Assistant Superintendent - School Services Dr. Deborah Price, Director - Magnet School Assistance Planning Grant Leon Adams, Director of Federal Programs Marion Woods, Coordinator of Staff Development Mr. Dennis Glasgow, Director of Math and Science RATIONALE In addressing proactively the potential turnover and retirement forecast, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) has specifically developed the Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute to meet the supply and demand for identifying, training, and hiring highly qualified building administrators for our schools. District data reveals that our present staff of principals brings 474.5 years of combined experience as building administrators and 1,214 years of combined experience in education. Such impressive years of service and experience suggest that many of our veteran administrators are at the height of their careers and could exit educational administration at any juncture. A closer examination of the administrators' total years of service further reveals the following results with regard to the impact of retirement for the category of building principals (see Table 1): Table 1 Total Years of Service in Education for LRSD Principals Years 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31+ 0 2 2 7 6 8 9 Elementary Middle 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 School High 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 School Total 0 3 2 12 7 13 13 Percentage 0% 6% 4% 24% 14% 26% 26%\n:c .... m C') C: ::c -oz co ?.5 me, -\u0026lt; !=' !!l C: C .zm.. . \u0026gt; ~ czi ll: m .z.. . !TI c:, C: C C) .m... C: \"ti C ?\nm :,, c:,n oO zZ ~~\no\no om ~\"ti mo n\no ~ .... The data strongly reveals that 52% of our present building administrators are reaching or have exceeded the appropriate years of service for retirement, which is recognized in Arkansas as 28 years of service. While this high percentage warns us that this district could face a sudden turnover in school leadership in upcoming years, it also suggests that the district has a high level of committed school administrators who have devoted a significant portion of their lives to the Little Rock School District. Nevertheless, the District must enact a preparation and training program that will begin to train and equip emergent leaders to assume the forthcoming leadership roles in schools. To this end, the Little Rock School District has created the Superintendent's Aspiring Principals' Institute, which will prepare an in-house cadre of emerging leaders who:  will provide a seamless transition into building leadership with the necessary confidence and skills.  will acquire extensive knowledge concerning research-based and common sense practices to facilitate school improvement.  develop an understanding of building culture and enhance student achievement. Initial Selection Process Each interested applicant submitted: o a completed application. o a letter of recommendation from their past or present supervisor. o a 1-2 page narrative that explained their professional goals to aspire as a principal and their accomplishments in their present position. A screening committee composed of central office personnel, current principals, and other professionals with expertise and experience in school leadership reviewed the initial applicants' qualifications and selected the applicants who progressed to Phase II. Second Phase of the Selection Process Of the 63 applicants who initially applied, 32 applicants ., ~re selected to participate in Phase II. Throughout the selection process, a total of four candidates withdrew from the process because of personal or professional reasons. Phase II required the participant to: 1) complete an online, timed profile assessment that highlighted certain leadership aspects. 2) complete an on-site case scenario assessment that measured their abilities to problem-solve a school issue, to write coherently, and to organize their thoughts and ideas under a timed environment. 3) submit two additional reference letters that spotlighted their abilities to be a leader. The Final Phase of the Selection Process From these pieces of data, the third and final round of applicants was chosen for an interview. Twenty-five (25) of the 31 applicants were invited to interview with the Selection Committee. A list of the participants who have met the selection process criteria is included with this report. These educators, who will be our first cadre of emerging leaders to participate in the Aspiring Principals' Institute, will be introduced to the Board at the January 27, 2005 meeting. We anticipate that classes will begin on Saturday, February 51\\ they will meet on two Mondays and one Saturday per month over the next year. The candidates will receive training and on-hands experience with instructional leadership as outlined on the timeline and schedule attached.\nr .... m n C: :c -.::,z co ~5 me, -\u0026lt; !=' ~ C: C .zm.. . \u0026gt; \"\"'' czi 31: .zm.. . !'Tl a, C: 8 !!l C: -.::, ~ m :\"' a,n oo zZ o\"' -.::,~ :o:cm::c \u0026lt;...\"tl mo .n..:..:.c.. \"' SELECTED PARTICIPANTS SUPERINTENDENT'S ASPIRING PRINCIPALS' INSTITUTE CANDIDATES Leticia Miller, Ed.D Ericka Mccarroll. Ed.S Diane Smith Katherine Snyder Nancy Swaty Judge Evans Cynthia Collins Monica Norwood Stephen Ewings M' Shay Callicott Jane M. Sharp, Ed.D Steven Wise Shoutell Richardson Teresa Richardson, EdS Barbara Strickland Alma Dawson CURRENT SCHOOL SITE / POSITION Dunbar - CUR. SPEC. Wilson - LITER. COACH Fulbright - K Washington -ASST. PRIN. McDermott - MEDIA SPECIAL! Mabevale Middle - Asst. Principal Jefferson, GT Spec Rightsell, First Grade Tchr Cloverdale El - 4th TCHR Parkview - T chr Forest Heights - TEACHER J. A. Fair, 7th ASST PRIN Wilson - FOCUS LRNG PR Gibbs - LITERACY COACH Williams - TCHR Reading Spec. - IRC Superintendent's Aspiring Principals Institute Timeline 2004-05 (rev. 12/1/04) DATE ACTIVITY PERSON RESPONSIBLE September 9-10 Meet with Communication Dr. Lloyd Sain Department to devise a Suellen Vann communication rollout plan September 9-14 Develop and complete the Dr. Lloyd Sain brochure for printing Suellen Vann Shea Cochran September 20-23 Review and prepare Dr. Lloyd Sain application, writing prompt, Dr. Linda Watson and rubric October 13-25, 2004 Introduce the Aspiring Dr. Lloyd Sain Principals' Rollout Suellen Vann Advertisement and Application Period October 29, 2004 Final day for applications to be Dr. Lloyd Sain submitted November 15-29, 2004 Review applications to identify Selected Panelist of Reviewers potential candidates for Phase II December 1-2, 2004 Notify and Implement Phase II Dr. L. Sain Location: TBD selection process M. Woods Lionel Ward December 6-9, 2004 Phase II On-site Dr. L. Sain 4:00- 7:00 PM/IRC Demonstration: Profile, Dr. L. Watson Letters, and Writing Dr. Debbie Price Marion Woods December 14-15, 2004 Phase II Scoring: Pick up Selection Committee Packets Dr. L. Sain January 4, 2005 Identify Final Phase candidates Selection Committee l:30P.M. and schedule interviews January 5-6, 2005 Notify Participants of Phase III Dr. L. Sain Progression January 7-21, 2005 Fine tune program needs, Steering Committee faculty, curriculum, etc. January 13-14, 2005 Hold interviews with the Phase Selection Committee III finalists January 18-21, 2005 Notify all Phase III applicants Dr. L. Sain of the final results January 18-28, 2005 Send information packets to Dr. L. Sain the participants/faculty January 27, 2005 Hold SAP! Reception Steering Committee 4:30 P.M. February 5, 2005 Aspiring Principals ' Institute Faculty classes begin\n:c .... ~ c::c \"DZ co \u0026gt;r--\u0026lt; O me, -\u0026lt; !=' !!l C C .zm.. . \u0026gt; V) V) iz5\ni: .zm.. . !\" a, C g .m... C \"D C ~ m :\" a, C') oO zZ ~~\n,:,\n,:, om c.... \"D mo .n..\n..,.\n.,. V) Aspiring Principals' Institute Class Schedule 2005 Primary MODULE TITLE/PRESENTER Faculty DATE TIME LOCATION Module I Understanding Self and Others: Organizational Value System Creating a Visionary Leadership Portfolio Module II Creating a High Performance Leaming Culture Module III LRSD Curriculum Overview Module IV Leadmg Assessment and Instruction Module V Relating Teacher Assignment and Student Work Module VI Using Data to Lead Change Module VII Federal State Statutes \u0026amp; LRSD Board Policies and Administrative Directives Module Fiscal Management and VIII Master Schedules Module IX Building and Leading Effective Team ModuleX Parental Involvement Module XI Providing Focused \u0026amp; Sustained Professional Development Module XII Communicating Effectively in a High-performing School Module Interview Techniques XIII Module Special Education XIV Steering Committee Members Dr. Lloyd Sain, Coordinator, Leadership Development Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent - School Services Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent - Student Discipline Dr. Olivine Roberts, Associate Superintendent - Curriculum Division Frances Jones, Assistant Superintendent - School Services Dr. Deborah Price - Director, Magnet Schools Assistance Planning Grant Leon Adams, Director of Federal Programs Marion Woods, Coordinator of Staff Development Dennis Glasgow, Director of Math and Science In addition to the Steering Committee Members who served as members of the Selection Committee, we also had the participation of our principals who readily understand and recognize the role of today's principal and the needed behaviors and skills to do this job: Frederick Fields, Principal Theresa Ketcher, Principal Ann Blaylock, Principal :,0 m ~ ~ ~ m :,0 z \u0026gt;,... \u0026gt; C: 0 ~\ni: ..... ~ C: :r \"Dz 00 \u0026gt;r- m-\u0026lt; cO, -\u0026lt; !==' !!l C: 0 zm ..... \u0026gt; ~ cz i l!C zm ..... !T1 Dl C: 0 C) ~ C: \"D ~ m :\" Dl n oO zZ o en \"D :--1 :,0:,0 om \u0026lt;m- \"oD .n...:..,..o.. en DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 January 27, 2005 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: January 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Eighty-five percent (85%) of the money from the bond issues approved by the voters in May of 2000 has been spent or obligated for construction and technology upgrades for LRSD school buildings. The list of completed projects contained in my report is a testament to the extent of improvements that have been made to our schools. Possible changes to the architectural drawings for the Forest Heights project may cause some delay in start-up. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary.\n,o m c3 ~ ~ m\n,o z ,\u0026gt;- \u0026gt; C C \n:c -\u0026lt; ~ ex \"tlZ co ~5 me, -\u0026lt; \u0026gt;~  ::c \"tlC ~ ~ fS z z::0 zm ,m- \"0 ' nc:: ::c\n,o c,n \". 'mCJ) ~ CD \u0026gt;c::  CJ) 8~ ZC/l ),,CJ) ::!CJ) om z\n,o Cll\u0026lt; n m CJ) Facility Name Central Fair Park Scott Field Wilson CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project Description I Cost I t:st. compIe11on Date Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Aug-05 Roof ! $245,784 I Mar-05 Track Renovations I $289,056 I Jan-05 HVAC for Cafeteria I $56,000 Feb-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2004-05 Facility Name Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Carver 1 Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Gibbs Addition I $705,670 I Dec-05 Meadowcliff Remodel I $164,150 I Jun-05 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I t:.st. compIe11on Date Booker 1 Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown - Chicot Electrical Upgrade I Unknown Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition I $520,750 I Unknown Fair Park Remodel I $799,000 Unknown Forest Heights Remodel I $1,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel I Unknown Unknown Mitchell I Renovation I $2,212,493 I Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation I $2,494,000 Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC i $640,QQQ I Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Administration Asbestos abatement - I $380,495 Mar-03 Administration Fresh air system - - $55,000 Aug-03 Adm-inis-tration- - Fire alarm $32,350 ~g-03 Administration HVAC I $70,000 I Nov-04 - Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 I Oct-01 I Energy efficient lighting + Alternative Learning Ctr. I $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 - -- - ~244,524 --- Bale Classroom addition/renovation Dec-02 - - -.--- - Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 - - - ~- Bale Partial _i:_oof replacement $269,587 - Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Baseline Renovation $953,520 Aug-04 Booker Gym Roof $48,525 Oct-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Booker Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Booker Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady Addition/renovation $973,621 Nov-04 Brady Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Sep-02 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,072 Aug-02 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver , Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01 Carver Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Dec-04 Central Reflecting Pond $57,561 Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking $174,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System $14,500 - - Aug-03 Central Purchase land for school I Unknown Dec-02 Central Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair I $24,000 Oct-01 Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug-01 Central Front landing tile repair I $22,470 Aug-01 Chicot Drainage $64,700 I Aug-04 Chicot Sound Attenuation $43,134 Jul-04 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting $132,678 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting I $189,743 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $1,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade I $9,200 Oct-04 Dodd i Energy efficient lighting $90,665 I Aug-01 Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 Aug-02 Dunbar Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Nov-04 Facilities Service ' Interior renovation I $84,672 . Mar-01 Facility Services !Fire alarm I $12,QQQ I Aug-03 Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 I Apr-02 Fair Park Energy efficient lighting $90,162 I Aug-OJ_ Fair Park !Asbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 Aug-01 J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 J. A. Fair Tnergy efficient lighting $277,594 1 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras $12,500 Jun-01 J. A. Fair Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 I Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System I I - $14,000 - - Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs I $391 ,871 Aug-03 ----- Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Nov-03 - j. ~~- Forest Park - --- Diagonal parking --- $111 ,742 ,-- Aug-03 Forest Park -- - Energy efficient lighting $119,788 May-01 - Energy efficient lighting -+-- - $134,463 - Fulbright Jun-01 -- + - Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation - $11,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin Renovation $2,511 ,736 Mar-03 Geyer Springs Roof Repair $161,752 Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation $11,770 Jul-01 Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 - Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 2\n:c .... ~ \u0026lt;= ::c -,:,z co \u0026gt;r--\u0026lt; O m c, -\u0026lt; s  '  ::c .,, \u0026lt;= gi~ ~z z:\u0026gt;l zm mCJ\u0026gt; ,-0 n\u0026lt;= ::c:\u0026gt;l c,n ~~ ~ CD \u0026gt;\u0026lt;=  CJ) 8~ ZCJ\u0026gt; \u0026gt;CJ\u0026gt; :::!v, om z:\u0026gt;J v,S n m CJ) Facility Name Hall Hall Hall Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson IRC Jefferson Jefferson Laidlaw Mablevale Elem Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale MS Mabelvale MS Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann McClellan -- McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McDermott McDermott McDermott Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Aug-01 Intercom I Feb-01 Security cameras $10,'6o0 Jun-01 Lockers i $43,854 Dec-04 'Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Jul-01 Roof replacement gym $107,835 May-01 Asbestos abatement Phase I $5QQ,QQQ I Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Aug-02 Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Asbestos abatement $43,639 I Oct-01 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1,630,000 Nov-02 Parking lot $269,588 Jul-01 Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 I Oct-04 Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 I Aug-01 Replace HVAC units I $300,000 Aug-02 Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 Energy efficient lighting $106,598  Dec-02 Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-01 Renovation $6,851,621 Mar-04 Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Apr-04 Asphalt walks I Dec-01 Walkway canopies 1 The total $1.8 million Dec-01 Boiler replacement j is what has been used so far on the Oct-01 Fencing r--- projects listed I Sep-01 , Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. , Aug-01 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 Irrigation System $14,750 Jul-03 Security cameras .i _ $36,300 - Jun-01 Energy efficient lighting I $303,614 May-01 . Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 Intercom .. $46,000 Feb-02 Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-04 1 Fire Alarm Upgrade I $7,?QQ 1 Sep-04 Energy efficient lighting I $79,411 . Feb-01 Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 I Aug-02 - Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 -- Asbestos abatement $253,412  Aug-02 Engergy efficient lighting -+-- $88,297 -- Dec-02 -- ---+---- - Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 -- Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Aug-01 Building Remediation $165,000 Jul-04 Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Asbestos abatement $13,000 Jul-01 HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Energy monitoring system installation $10 ,695 May-01 Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Apr-01 Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Parking lot $138,029 Aug-02 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 27, 2005 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Proiect Descriotion I Cost l Est. Completion Date Parkview !Addition I $2,121,226 I Dec-04 Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 I Jun-02 Parkview I Roof replacement I $273,877 I Sep-01 Parkview Exterior lights I $10,784 I Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls I $301,938 Aug-01 I Parkview Locker replacement I $120,000 I Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I $315,ooo I Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation I $5,290 I Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm I $25,000 I Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1,193,2591 Nov-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation I $3,755,041 I Nov-04 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 T Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition I $111 ,742 Aug-02 Romine  Asbestos abatement $10,000 I Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $3,534,675 I Mar-03 Securityfrransportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Addition $2 ,000,000 I Nov-04 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest New roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest Drainage I street widening __ $_250,000 Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation 0- - $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation -- - $275.~ - Dec-01 -- Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation 1Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 -- - Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry 1 Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 -- Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 -- Dec-04 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting _!74,776 Feb-01 ---+-- - Wakefield Demolition/ Asbestos Abatement - -- $200,000 - Nov-02 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Oct-04 -- -- - Washington Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 --  Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 --- Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 - - . Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Aug-01 - Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 - Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191 ,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation $2 ,106,492 Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Dec-03 -- -- - Williams Energy efficient lighting - $122,719 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Feb-04 --- r Wilson Parking Expansion -- $110,000 Aug-03 - Renovation -- --- - Woodruff $246,419 Aua-02 4\ni: -m\u0026lt; (\") C: ::J: -CZ 00 \u0026gt;r-\u0026lt; O me, -\u0026lt; s \u0026gt;   ::J: ..., C: !B~ ~z z\nJJ zm m\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; ,-0 (\") C: ::J:\nJJ C) (\") ~rn ~ a, \u0026gt;c:  \u0026lt;J\u0026gt; 8~ Z\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; :::!\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; om z\n,:, \u0026lt;J\u0026gt;\u0026lt; n m \u0026lt;J\u0026gt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: January 27, 2005 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker .!X.,' z )\u0026gt; z n ,\u0026gt;....\nJJ m c3 ~ (J) s )\u0026gt;   :x: -.:,c ~~ isz z\n,\n:, zm m\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; ,-0 nC :x:\nJJ Cl n \u0026lt;J\u0026gt;m  (J) ~ a, )\u0026gt; C  (J) g~ Z\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; )\u0026gt; (J) :::! (J) om z\n,, \u0026lt;J\u0026gt;S n m (J) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: January 27, 2005 To: Board of Directors From~ Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - January This is the sixty-third communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, one middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. b) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - January 2005 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Other a) b) c) issues. Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Reviewing Teacher School Supply Fund Records for recommendations. Assisting in travel regulation modifications for submission to the Board. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org.\nz: .... ~ c::::c -oz 00 ?.5 me, -\u0026lt; \u0026gt;,\u0026lt; ::c -0 c:: ~~ igz z\n,:, zm m.-o\"' nc:: ::c\n,:, on ?\u0026gt; rn ~ CXl \u0026gt;c::  V, g~ z V, \u0026gt; V, ::! V, om z\n,:, enn\u0026lt; m V, DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 January 27, 2005 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  The computer replacement cycle begins this month. Over the next few weeks Windows 95 computers will be replaced at 14 schools. Approximately 900 machines will be purchased in this phase of upgrades. For the first time the District will be offering teachers at the schools being upgraded an opportunity to purchase the replaced machines for a nominal fee.  Training for teachers at Parkview in using Edline for parent access to grades began in January.  E-rate filing season opened on December 15 and closes on February 17. We are filing for telecommunications costs, switches, and telephone system maintenance. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services .!E.,l z \u0026gt;z n .:\n-\nI IJ) ,,.~\u0026lt;  :::c .., C: ~f\n~z z\n zm m!Jl r- 0 nc: :::c\n,, G) n ~rn ~ a, \u0026gt; C:  IJ) g~ ZIJl )\u0026gt;,IJ) ::!IJl om z\no IJ)\u0026lt; \u0026lt;'\u0026gt; m IJ) DATE: January 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are consid~r,j intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly Williamfo~ector of Human Resources ~ CD \u0026gt; C:  \u0026lt;J) g~ Z\u0026lt;J\u0026gt;  \u0026lt;J\u0026gt; ::! \u0026lt;J) oz m\no \u0026lt;J)~ m \u0026lt;J) Personnel Changes Page2 January 27, 2005 NAME ---- START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Allan, Ashley Reason: Personal Allen, Sarah Reason: Accepted another position East, Pamela Reason: Accepted another position Hays, Linda Reason: Retirement Izard, Rhonda Reason: Personal McQueen, Kay Reason: Personal Moorehead, Kenneth Reason: None Given Pannell, Erin Reason: Leaving city Roland, Ronald Reason: Certification Expiration Samuels, Lori Reason : Personal Agnew, April Elementary V/ FRANKLIN Speech Pathologists/ BRADY Reading/ EARLY CHILDHOOD Learning Skills/ ACC-METRO Gifted and Talented/ DUNBAR Biology/ CENTRAL Instrumental Music/ PARKVIEW Elementary IV/ WAKEFIELD Electronics/ ACC-METRO Elementary I/ MCDERMOTT New Certified Employees Tutor/ WILSON 8-16-04 12-7-04 8-11-04 1-4-05 9-2-03 12-17-04 1-25-82 1-18-05 8-16-93 1-13-05 8-11-04 1-14-05 8-13-01 1-17-05 8-11-04 1-13-05 8-28-89 1-07-05 8-11-04 1-05-05 1-03-05 6-18 56209.00 TCH925 62-9 46572.00 SPE925 6-21 60020.00 TCH11 6-21 53213.00 TCH925 6-12 49277.00 TCH925 6-08 44655.00 TCH925 1-17 47715.00 TCH925 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 1-10 39283.00 VOC10 1-03 31195.00 TCH925 1-01 30040.00 TCH925 annual 16115.21 prorated Personnel Changes Page 3 January 27, 2005 START DATE/ NAME POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE Brown, Lori Elementary V/ 1-03-05 FRANKLIN Butcher, Angee Elementary Ill/ 1-3-05 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY Smith, Donald Journalism/ 10-19-04 MCCLELLAN Smith, Tunza ESL/ 1-03-05 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE Spaulding, Robert Physics/ 12-14-04 MCCLELLAN Spears, Marsha Elementary I/ 1-3-05 CARVER Certified Promotion NONE Certified Transfer NONE SALARY CLASS 4-13 TCH925 4-18 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-14 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 47284.00 annual 25365.90 prorated 53061 .00 annual 29071 .73 prorated 31195.00 annual 24692.24 prorated 30040.00 annual 16428.13 prorated 48439.00 annual 26994.65 prorated 30617.00 annual 16424.74 prorated .!J,,I z \u0026gt;z C') \u0026gt;r-\no m c3 .\n.\n.o. \"' s \u0026gt;\u0026lt;\n=  C') \u0026gt;r-cO 5!!! !6 ~ z~ ~~ ~~ \"' ~ a, \u0026gt;c::  \"' 8~ ZU\u0026gt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;n ::::!u, oz m\no \"'s C') m \"' Personnel Changes Page4 January 27, 2005 NAME POSITION / SCHOOL START DATE/ SALARY END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Brewington, Kimberly Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-01 Reason: None Given TRANSPORTION 1-13-05 BUSDRV Buford, Kamirah Instructional Aide/ 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: Personal JEFFERSON 12-17-04 INA925 Coakley, Kevin Instructional Aide/ 11-11-04 33-03 Reason: Resigned without CHICOT 12-14-04 INA925 Notice Dedmon, Nancy Custodian/ 7-01-01 31-15 Reason: Retirement CLOVERDALE 1-07-05 CUS12 ELEMENTARY Gibbons, William Maintenance/ 11-9-01  51-10 Reason: Personal Reasons FACILITY SERVICES 12-9-04 MAINT Gregory, Regena Nurse/ 9-20-04 38-03 Reason: None Given STEPHENS 11-30-04 NURSES Hackney, Jon Maintenance/ 11-19-01 49-10 Reason: Termination-No FACILITY SERVICES 12-9-04 MAINT Appeal Pending Hubbard, Myia Instructional Aide/ 10-20-03 33-13 Reason: Personal Reasons WILSON 1-10-05 INA925 Jackson, Lamond Maintenance/ 8-9-99 40-8 Reason: Termination-No FACILITY SERVICES 12-30-04 MAINT Appeal Pending Johnson, Linda Custodian/ 1-19-04 31-03 Reason: Personal Reasons FULBRIGHT 12-22-04 CUS925 Jones, Deborah Care/ 8-30-04 1-06 Reason: None Given CARE 12-18-04 CARE Joseph, Fred Maintenance/ 6-12-89 52-20 Reason: Retirement FACILITY SERVICES 1-14-05 MAINT ANNUAL SALARY 9481.00 14732.00 10934.00 22080.00 34548.00 19020.00 32544.00 14735.00 23436.00 12085.00 7.64 per hour 47976.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 January 27, 2005 .!X.,' z \u0026gt; z START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL n \u0026gt; CLASS SALARY r- NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE\na .m., 0 .\n.a. \"' Marsh, Janice Child Nutrition/ 9-23-04 3-01 9350.00 Reason: Personal Reasons CHILD NUTRITION 1-27-05 FSH550 McDonald, Gladys Care/ 11-20-02 3-06 8.54 s x\n= Reason: None Given CARE 12-18-04 CARE per hour  n \u0026gt; r- .o.. O\"' Mercado, Maria Instructional Aide/ 4-01-04 33-17 16595.00 gz\na C) Reason: Leaving City BRADY 12-15-04 INA925 z~ ~J: ~~ Mullins, Michael Child Nutrition/ 8-23-04 42-01 20184.00 \"' Reason: None Given CHILD NUTRITION 1-04-05 AN12 Osorio, Rosa Custodian/ 11-15-01 31-01 11379.00 Reason: Health Reasons ROMINE 12-6-04 CUS925 Patterson, Gary Instructional Aide/ 2-2-04 33-15 19863.00 Reason: Health Reasons ROCKEFELLER 1-4-05 INA925 Samples, Karen Child Nutrition/ 8-26-91 3-13 9892.00 Reason: Retirement CHILD NUTRITION 1-3-05 FSH550 Scaife, James Custodian/ 11-15-04 34-03 17388.00 Reason: Resignation without FRANKLIN 11-16-04 CUS12 Notice Senter, Amelia Care/ 8-19-04 1-05 7.56 Reason: None Given CARE 12-18-04 CARE per hour Whitfield, Charles Maintenance/ 3-12-01 51-10 34548.00 Reason: Termination-No FACILITY SERVICES 12-9-04 MAINT Appeal Pending Yeargin, Julius Custodian/ 10-9-00 34-10 20796.00 Reason: Leaving City BALE 11-11-04 CUS12 New Non-Certified Employees ~ Allen, Sherion Parent Coordinator/ 12-7-04 50-7 30660.00 a, \u0026gt;c  \"' ALC AN10 annual g~ 17782.80 z \"' \u0026gt; \"' :::! \"' prorated om z::a \"' ns m \"' Personnel Changes Page 6 January 27, 2005 NAME Allmon, Shikara Baggett, Ruth Broadway, Axie Clingham, Warnetta Evans, Kim Glover, Bruce Lasker, Devon Moreland-Adams, Robbie Obi, Talisa START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Instructional Aide/ 1-10-05 MABEL VALE ELEMENTARY Instructional Aide/ 11-29-04 CENTRAL Custodian/ 11-15-04 CENTRAL Child Nutrition/ 11-16-04 CHILD NUTRITION Instructional Aide/ 12-6-04 CHICOT Maintenance/ 12-20-04 FACILITY SERIVES Instructional Aide/ 1-3-05 CHICOT Nurse/ 11-11-04 ALC Custodian/ 12-9-04 SOUTHWEST SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 33-04 11253.00 INA925 annual 5839.39 prorated 33-09 13070.00 INA925 annual 8195.24 prorated 31-01 14532.00 CUS12 annual 8842.88 prorated 3-01 9350.00 FSH550 annual 6333.87 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 9665.40 prorated 49-07 29760.00 MAINT annual 15323.23 prorated 33-16 16109.00 INA925 annual 8794.64 prorated 52-06 6319.20 NURSES annual 4179.89 prorated 31-01 14532.00 CUS12 annual 7915.30 prorated Personnel Changes Page7 January 27, 2005 START DATE/ SALARY NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS Pulliam, Shareka Instructional Aide/ 1-3-05 33-04 JEFFERSON INA925 Williams, Donald Instructional Aide/ 1-3-05 33-06 WILSON INA925 Non-Certified Promotion Clark, Gerald - Promoted from Custodian to Head Custodian Collier, Richard - Promoted from Carpenter Trade to Carpenter Trade Specialist Musgrave, Jimmy - Promoted from HVAC Trade Specialist to HVAC Foreman Phelps, Stephanie - Promoted from Work Order Secretary to Warehouse Specialist Approved leave as recommended by the Superintendent Hayley, Leslie- medical leave without pay (effective 1-3-05) ANNUAL SALARY 8214.69 annual 4484.78 prorated 11946.00 annual 6521 .87 prorated .!X,,l z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt;r- ::0 m \"0 0 .::.0. \"' s x\n::: n \u0026gt;r- oO o\u0026lt;--\"' !5 ~ z~ ~~ ~~ \"' ~ CD \u0026gt;c:  \"' 8* Zf/l  Ul ~om\"' z::o UlS n m \"' DATE: January 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: ~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~ ~ ,Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager .?.\", z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; r-\n:o m c3 ~ V\u0026gt; DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School Assorted office furniture Mr. Gary Stephenson valued at approximately on behalf of State Farm $8,322.44 Insurance Company Central High School $2,000.00 cash to the Mr. Walter C. Coleman baseball team Cloverdale Middle Gift cards, valued at Bank of America School $125.00, and trophies, valued at $95.00, to be used for student rewards and teacher incentives Terry Elementary Piano valued at Ms. Karen Stein, Music School $1,500.00 Specialist at Terry Terry Elementary $958.32 cash to Mr. Robert Jones of School purchase a video the Optimist Club of camera for the Greater Little Rock media center Western Hills Side by side Mr. and Mrs. Richard C. Elementary School refrigerator valued Blaine at $200.00 DATE: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 JANUARY 4, 2005 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ :],(J,{__Cl.,l,,v SUBJECT: DONATION Gary Stephenson, on behalf of State Farm Insurance Company, 22 State Farm Drive, Monroe, Louisiana 71208, generously donated the following items to Little Rock Central High School: 20 desks, 20 file cabinets, 2 work tables, 2 bookcases, 13 conference room tables, and 72 chairs. The value of the furniture is $8,322.44. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. \"-, .. r1 r. .,   ... ~ '\n_ .?.,' z \u0026gt;z ,~... :x, .m., 0 e~n s .x\n= (\") \u0026gt;,... .c_O en gz :x,G'\u0026gt; z:x,\ni::m m~ ~~ en DATE: ATTN: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 12/17/2004 DARRAL PARADIS NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DONATION Walter C. Coleman of 3100 Cole Avenue, Apt. 215, Dallas, Texas 74204, graciously donated $2,000 to our baseball team. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. December 1, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Angela Munns, Principal RE: Donation Please accept the following donations that were given to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. The trophies will be awarded to six grade students who participate in a \"Spelling B\". The gift cards will be given as incentives to teachers who have perfect attendance, raise student test scores, etc. Bank of America Ms. Carol Murray, Vice President Gift Cards $125.00- Trophies $95.00 Donated Subject Dividers (25) ? Total Value $220.00 !.D., z )\u0026gt; z ~.... ~ \"D 0 ~ U) s .x := (\") )\u0026gt; .... oO c... U) gz\n%le, z:x\u0026gt; ll: m m~ :!:i~ U) TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \u0026lt;\u0026lt;Home of the Tcny Tfrrcn\" *  (I 4) (I * (I '3- DATE: December 17. 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: ~ Becky Ramsey. Principal RE: Donation Karen Stein, Music Specialist at Terry Elementary, has generously donated her piano valued at $1,500 to our school . It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. r l r - - ~-1'- r.. 0.... ...'\"\" -t\u0026gt; .. \\.,, TERRY ELEMENTARY S CHOOL ccH01ne of the Terry Tigcd) * (I * (I '1- (I * (I * (I*  DATE: TO: FROM: t3f}__ RE: -- 0.':J 1-4-112 Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Becky Ramsey, Principal Donation Mr. Robert Jones from the Optimist Club of Greater Little Rock, 9900 Vinson Court, Little Rock, AR, 72205, has generously d~nated $958.32 to Terry Elementary on January 4, 2005. The money was used to purchase a new video camera for the media center. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. ~ .. - r 1 ~.,.\n:...,\n. t!_, ~'J -. ' .... -- _ : ..... - - ., - WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL December 8, 2004 To: Darrel Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Scott Morgan, Principal Subject: Donation Mr. and Mrs. Richard C. Blaine have graciously donated a side by side refrigerator valued at $200.00 to the Western Hills Elementary School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. ,. . '. ' 4901 Western Hills  Phone (501) 447-6900  Fax (501) 447 -6901  Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 81 0 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: January 27, 2005 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: December 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the December 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 12/31/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 12/31/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 55,681,497 96.76% 61,436,691 61,324,530 99.82% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 8,793,799 87.07% 12,135,000 5,821,274 47.97% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 225,933 59.46% 485,000 75,378 15.54% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 64,666 32.33% 245,000 169,098 69.02% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 142,937 59.56% 215,000 148,349 69.00% TOTAL 98,607,800 64,908,833 65.83% 106,311,691 67,538,630 63.53% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21,000 11,594 55.21% 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% TOTAL 21,000 11,594 55.21% 22,000 11,183 50.83% REVENUE- STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 24,1 93,699 45.45% 65,082,694 29,621,016 45.51% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 963,624 50.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 2,953,745 45.45% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141,165 1,141,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 3,373,820 40.65% 8,275,000 3,468,815 41.92% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 521,646 37.26% 1,350,000 634,461 47.00% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 271,285 16.20% 2,100,000 470,225 22.39% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 135,094 49.42% 5,542,510 2,593,434 46.79% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,330,714 32.26% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 1,473,688 37.79% 4,575,000 1,659,652 36.28% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 311,832 33.88% 934,380 306,122 32.76% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 193,739 53.82% 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 32,128,752 42.97% 102,522,882 45,160,018 44.05% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 562,662 14.99% 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 97,611,841 55.10% 212,770,581 112,717,987 52.98% REVENUE-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 7,040,060 29.24% 21,531,929 9,541,314 44.31% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 2,368,924 59.22% 4,500,000 2,441,928 54.27% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 9,316,330 27,964,934 6,032,105 21.57% TOTAL 52,765,141 18,725,314 35.49% 53,996,863 18,015,347 33.36% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 116,337,155 50.60% 266,767,444 130,733,335 49.01% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 12/31/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 12/31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 38,826,959 38.56% 117,324,912 44,814,698 38.20% BENEFITS 26,483,772 9,621,831 36.33% 36,185,81 i 12,491,139 34.52% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 8,107,685 41.12% 20,959,918 8,195,818 39.10% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 4,165,135 50.88% 8,725,914 4,060,254 46.53% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 549,257 34.86% 2,760,600 752,520 27.26% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 2,957,578 35.27% 10,770,418 450,883 4.19% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,699,176 38.84% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 68,927,621 38.91% 209,202,382 75,356.147 36.02% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 7,038,023 27.01% 23,853,134 7,615,890 31.93% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 2,157,873 53.95% 5,007,809 1,928,649 38.51% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 8,613,259 34.89% 27,964,934 9,306,807 33.28% TOTAL 54,745,544 17,809,155 32.53% 56,825,877 18,851,346 33.17% TOT AL EXPENSES 231,877,543 86,736,m 37.41% 266,028,259 94,207,493 35.41% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) 29,600,377 739,184 36,525,841 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531,706 6,531,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 4,474,738 1,176,943 3,169,958 OPERATING 9,052,274 37,711,075 10,099,905 43,893,546 TOTAL 10,630,451 42,185,813 11,276,848 47,063,505 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 12-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,519.02 77,519.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,872.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,972.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 11,586.46 80,000.00 48,838.79 8,936.88 33,810.79 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,090,835.40 2,708,744.24 1,104,364.63 2,277,726.53 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541.25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 0.00 0.00 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,569,593.08 618,298.54 113,711.21 6,837,583.33 RENOVATION PROJECTS 12,752,856.34 5,247,940.47 1,528,227.10 5,976,688.77 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 350,547.35 234,696.65 2,127,557.46 SUBTOTAL 28,008,836.80 1,143,377.19 80,000.00 8,974,369.39 2,989,936.47 17,267,908.13 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 181,104.00 626,722.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,773,544.18 (80,000.00) 14,693,544.18 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 390,654.49 5,428,092.44 SUBTOTAL 21 ,555,688.12 571,758.49 (80,000.00) 0.00 0.00 22,047,446.61 GRAND TOTAL ~l! liliD al!li l!li l Zl:i la:i lia 2Jll2 a,:izz ilil! a:i i :ia:i :iali ~z aMaa aili,za I PROJECT I ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 12-31-04 2000-01 ADMINISTRATION 760,526.80 889,772.32 NEW WORK PROJECTS 38,788,412.86 443,467.00 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,862,548.33 2,641,482.13 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 18,922,387.50 791,385.63 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,027,748.84 397,615.34 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.53 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 15,987,365.15 TOTAL 143,493,792.62 5,852,669.42 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 114,896.16 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 15,993,062.06 109,609.73 27,732.73 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 9,012.76 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,887,763.72 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 18,091,992.05 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 765,594.97 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 37,890,054.45 EXPENSE ---- ENCUMBERED THRU 12-31-04 --- - THRU 12-31-04 48,838.79 8,936.88 2,708,744.24 1, 104,364fil - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 618,298.54 113,711.21 5,247,940.47 1,528,227.10 350,547.35 234,696.65 -- - - 8,974,369.39 2,989,936.47 1N3111NHnorov xi S\u0026gt;IHVlll3H 9NIS01:l 11111 ENDING ALLOCATION SUBTOTAL - 12-31-04 726,716.01 33,810.79 36,510,686.33 2,277,726.53 251 ,272:-3 14,541.25 4,862,548.33 0.00 12,084,804.17 6,837,583.33 45,051,060.07 5,976,688.77 10,751,431.51 2,127,557.46 15,987,365.15 110,238,519.35 33,255,273.28 Operating Operating Operating Operating Operating Operating Operating Operating Food Service Activity Fund Fund Total Total Total Bond Account Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Total Deseg Plan Scholarship Total Rockefeller Scholarship Total + + i f t Purchase Date 12-30-04 12-10-04 12-16-04 12-16-04 12-16-04 12-16-04 12-16-04 12-16-04 12-30-04 12-21-04 09-06-04 07-14-04 01-30-04 08-17-04 06-10-04 08-02-04 08-02-04 09-15-04 12-17-04 12-09-04 06-10-04 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31 _,_~04 - Maturity Date TFN 03-15-05 01-14-05 02-01-05 02-15-05 03-01-05 03-15-05 04-01-05 TFN TFN 03-07-05 01-10-05 01-31-05 08-16-05 01-10-05 02-05-05 08-02-05 03-15-05 TFN 06-24-05 01-10-05 - - - Institution I nterest Rate-_ Type _,_ Principal -f---- --- -1-- - -- -+---- -------\u0026lt; 2.100% ~ 15,125,000.00 2.410% CD _ - 4 ,668,206.83 ~10% --+----C-D 5,700,000.00 Bank of A~rica _ Twin City Bank Twin City Bank Twin City Bank Twin City Bank Twin City Bank __ 2.630%- CCDD _ 11 ,000,000.00 2.670% 9,200,000.00 Twin City Bank _ Twin City Bank Bank of America - Bank of America 2.710% 2.730% 2.750% 1.970% 2.040% 1.843% CD 3,500,000.00 - - CD 3,500,000.00 CD 2,60Q,0OO.O0 55,293,2~.83 Repo 920,000.00 920,000.00_ Repo ~--:\n,235,000.00 ---+-~1,235,000.0Q_ Regions CD Metropolitan Bancorp South Twin City Bank Bank of America Twin City Bank Twin City Bank - - 1.930% -,-- CD 400,000.00 - -----:r]oo.934.31 Bank of the Ozarks Bank of America Bank of America Bank of America 1 850% CD ~ 610% - - CD ___ 2,100,2~.72 .J.1.,000,0QQ.00 - 1.670% 2.580% 3.030% 2.210% 2.040% 2.300% - Treasury Bills - CD 5,385,005.84 4,500,000.00 CD 4,500,000.00 CD Repo - 10,366,251.16 2,460,000.00 -- 41,712,436.03 Treasury Bills ,---7,,..8,....4c'-,9_ 9 _4_.0_4-1 _ 78i,994.04 1.670% _ Treasury ~s 252,468.56 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_595","title":"Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs Evaluation Report, 2 copies","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Dreyfus, Jeanne P."],"dc_date":["2005/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs Evaluation Report, 2 copies"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/595"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["81 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nJeanne P. Dreyfus, Ed. D., external evaluator\nLittle Rock School District Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs Evaluation Report 2005 - 2006 Jeanne P. Dreyfus Ed. D. External Evaluatorm m nri The evaluator would like to acknowledge and thank the Little Rock School Districts Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) director and staff for their generous and timely assistance in the collection of a wide array of data for this report. p p p p p p p p p p p p p pH I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAGNET SCHOOLS AND PROGRAM EVALUATION IN IN Over the past twenty years, the Little Rock School District has established a number of full-scale magnet schools and magnet programs in several of its area schools. These schools and programs are intended to promote educational excellence and student diversity. This report summarizes research and evaluation work performed over a fifteen-month period on 17 of these entities. A two part endeavor, Part I, covered in this report, focused on a comprehensive examination of the following schools and programs: IN  Stipulation Magnet Schools (6)- Booker, Carver, Gibbs, and Williams Elementary Schools, Mann Middle School and Parkview High School IN  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools (4) - Cloverdale and Mabelvale Middle Schools, and J.A. Fair and McClellan High Schools IN  Schools with embedded Magnet Programs (7) - King, Rockefeller, Romine and Washington Elementary Schools, Dunbar and Henderson Middle Schools, and Central High School IN Professionally recognized evaluation standards guided the creation and content of the evaluation study, the manner in which data were collected and the reporting methodology. IN IN The evaluator collected a wide array of data on stakeholders perceptions of the schools and programs, students academic achievement and the schools abilities to de-isolate minorities and attract diverse student populations. Throughout the work, there was also an over-arching goal of determining the districts, schools and communitys commitment to the magnet concept and program sustainability. IN This study generated a number of preliminary findings and areas that warrant further study. Part II of the work, which will be conducted during 2006 - 2007, will examine these areas in-depth. IN General Finding and Recommendation IN A major observation that emerged from this study was that, although the community knows the district offers a number of school choices to students and parents, there is no clearly stated, district-level magnet vision and mission statement for the non-stipulation magnet schools and embedded magnet programs. Mission and vision statements are important because they provide clarity and direction to stakeholders and guide program funding, implementation and evaluation. IN IN This finding generated a recommendation that the District decide how (and whether) it is going to utilize its already existing set of magnet schools and programs to promote student diversity and academic achievement. Creating a magnet mission/vision statement would clarify the districts intent and a centralized magnet office would provide the guidance and oversight necessary to sustain the work. IN Academic Achievement IN Part of the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP), the states Benchmark exams measure the degree to which students have mastered subject content standards. The goal for each student is proficiency in all requirements at each grade level. Proficient students demonstrate solid academic performance for the grade tested and are well prepared for the next level of school. (Arkansas Department of Education, 2005 Arkansas School Performance Report. IN2 p In almost every instance across grade and school levels, the six Stipulation Magnet Schools had higher percentages of students who were Proficient and Above in Literacy and Mathematics standards over time than other schools in the study. Students enrolled in the four Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) Schools trailed noticeably in proficiency attainment in the two subject areas, especially mathematics, but the schools have made progress in moving MSAP students out of the Below Basic category, the lowest performance level for these exams. p p The academic achievement of students enrolled in the schools with embedded magnet programs could not be tracked in Year I because the available data are not consistent and appear unreliable. It is anticipated that this problem will be solved in Year II of the study and analysis of magnet students achievement levels in the embedded magnet programs will be available in the Year II report. p p Program Perceptions Data from stakeholders provided insight into their understanding of the magnet schools and programs and their perceptions of their worth. Our data showed that a majority of those sampled believed the children liked school and that the schools were preparing the students for the future. Sampled teachers generally believed that their magnet programs were meeting the academic needs of their African-American students and that their programs were an important reason why students enrolled in their schools. Two-thirds (magnet programs) to three-quarters (stipulation magnets) of parents thought that their childrens learning needs were being met and the majority thought their children were receiving a quality education. p p p However, the data also showed that sampled parents of children in Stipulation Magnet Schools would be less likely than sampled Magnet-program parents to continue sending their children to their schools if they no longer had magnet programs or had altered programs of diminished quality. When asked to elaborate, parents offered explanations like the following: p p  No ... my assumption is that the high standards will decrease.   The magnet program is what makes us go to that school.   The school just wouldn t be the same.  II The data suggest that an expanded investigation into the communitys perceptions of the magnet schools and programs would assist the district in future decisions regarding these entities. Especially important would be inquiries into what parents would do if their magnet schools or programs were altered or eliminated. p Funding p The wide variation in magnet funding of embedded Magnet Programs and the MSAP Schools suggests that the data do not represent actual program expenditures. Some of the 17 schools in the evaluation do not have any money budgeted for their magnet programs. While others, who were depending on grant money, found themselves without the funding they needed when their grants expired. For these reasons, the evaluator suggests that magnet programs with no magnet funding stream be fully funded if their magnet programs have committed leadership and faculties and viable program infrastructures. For those magnet programs with outside funding that has expired, the district should consider planning, funding, and monitoring the future of these magnet programs so that the large investment in place in these schools is not lost. p p p Finally, the district should revisit those programs not independently functioning as magnet programs. A decision should be made to either phase them out or integrate them into other aspects of the schools curricula with funding earmarked to cover the transitions costs needed to complete this process. p p p 1II 3 II TABLE OF CONTENTS II Page II Introduction 1 I. Evaluation Study Design 2 II  Data Availability and Discrepancies (Recommendation - Rec., p. 7) 7 II II. Magnet Schools and Magnet Program Descriptions 8 II  Introduction, Evaluation Questions  Mission Statements, Organizational Chart {Rec., p. 10)  Nature of the Magnet Programs - Descriptions 9 9 11 II  Stipulation Magnet Schools  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools  Embedded Magnet Programs 11 14 18 II II  Program Implementation Levels  Minority Group Isolation  Opportunities to Meet State/District Content Standards  Equitable Program Access  Special Situations - Hall and Rockefeller (Rec., p. 31) 20 22 25 27 29 II III. Academic Achievement - Combined Populations 32 II II  Introduction  Stipulation Magnet Schools  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools  High Schools  Achievement Comparisons Across School Clusters 33 34 35 36 38 II IIIA. Academic Achievement - African-American Students 41 II  Stipulation Magnet Schools  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools  Areas of Progress  Achievement Gap 42 43 44 45 II II II II4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IV. Program Perceptions 48  M H  Introduction, Evaluation Question  Parents (Rec., p. 54)  Students  Teachers  School Program/Administrative Leaders 49 49 54 55 59 HH V. Level of Interest, Support and Involvement 60  Evaluation Question, Volunteer Hours, Outreach Activities  Partnerships, Transportation and Zone Information 61 62 H VI. Program Expenditures (Rec., p. 70) 64 H VII. Other Magnet School and Program Information and Outcomes 71  Student Enrollment  Teacher Education Levels  Magnet Class Requirements  Access Participation and Progress 72 73 75 76 M  Mobility  Advanced Placement Enrollment  Graduation Rates  Achievement and the Economically Disadvantaged 78 VIII. Sustainability Work (Rec., p. 82) 79 IX. Summary - Key Findings and Recommendations 83 Appendix\nParent, Student and Principal Surveys List of Graphs 1. Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distributions  Stipulation Magnet Schools  MSAP Schools 22 23 H TABLE OF CONTENTS nn M 5 II Page II 2. Student Achievement - Combined Population II II  Stipulation Magnet School  Magnet School Assistance Program Schools  High School  High School  Comparisons Across School Clusters 34 35 36 37 38 3. Student Achievement - African-American Students II II  Stipulation Magnet Schools  Magnet School Assistance Program Schools  Areas of Progress - African American - Below Basic  Achievement Gap - Elementary Schools Achievement 42 43 44 45+ II 4. Program Perceptions II II  Parents Ability to Describe Magnet Programs  Importance of Magnet Program  Enrollment Plans if Magnet Discontinued  Students Program Perceptions  Teachers Program Perceptions  Teachers Magnet Staff Development 51 52 53 54 56+ 58 II 5. Funding II n II  Stipulated Magnet Schools - Funding by Source  Stipulated Magnet Schools - Per-pupil Expenditures 66  Stipulated Magnet Schools - Specialists and Classroom Certified Staff  Stipulated Magnet Schools - Magnet Expenditures  MSAP Per-pupil Expenditures  Magnet Programs - Per-pupil Expenditures - Whole Pop.  MSAP and Magnet Programs Expenditures  Expenditures per Square Foot 66 67 67 68 68 69 70 II 6. Other Magnet Schools and Program Information and Outcomes II II  Student Enrollment  Teacher Education Levels  Mobility Rates  Graduation Rates  Economically Disadvantaged 73+ 73+ 76 77 78 II Little Rock School District II6 Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs Evaluation Report 2005-2006 Introduction Over the past twenty years, the Little Rock School District has established a number of full-scale magnet schools and embedded a variety of magnet programs in several of its area schools. These schools and programs follow a long standing tradition of promoting educational excellence and student diversity. This report summarizes research and evaluation work performed over a fifteen-month period on 18 of these entities in the Little Rock School District. A two part endeavor, Part I, summarized here, focused on a comprehensive examination of the schools and programs. The data that the evaluator collected and analyzed yielded a number of preliminary findings and underscored areas of interest that warrant further study. Part 11 of the work, which will be conducted during 2006 - 2007, will examine these areas in-depth. The current narrative describes the magnet schools and programs, documents their effectiveness, and offers recommendations based on preliminary evaluation findings. For reporting purposes, it divides the schools and programs into three clusters - Stipulation Magnet Schools, Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) Schools, and (embedded) Magnet programs. Each of these clusters has common characteristics and structures which will be described and reviewed at length in the sections that follow. The report is organized into nine sections that examine the following topics:  Section I: Evaluation Study Design.  Section II: Magnet Schools and Magnet Program Descriptions  Section III: Academic Achievement - Combined Populations  Stipulation Magnet Schools  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools  Embedded Magnet Programs  Section IIIA: Academic Achievement - African-American Students Section IV: Section V: Section VI\nSection VII: Program Perceptions - Parents, Students, Teachers and Administrators Level of Interest, Support and Involvement Program Expenditures Other Magnet School and Program Information and Outcomes  Student Enrollment  Teacher Education Levels  Magnet Class Requirements and Magnet Seals  Mobility  Advanced Placement Enrollment  Graduation Rates  Achievement and the Economically Disadvantaged  Section VIII: Sustainability Work  Section EX\nSummary - Key Findings and Recommendations In addition to the summary of key findings and recommendations presented in Section IX, section findings and recommendations can be found throughout the body of the report n mm I 7 IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN SECTION I: EVALUATION STUDY DESIGN8 Section I: Evaluation Study Design  The evaluation study was designed to answer a number of questions about student achievement, opportunities for standards-based learning, the de-isolation of African-American students, and levels of magnet support and funding. H Inquiries into these four areas were supplemented by additional questions about: H  the nature of magnet programs and their implementation levels,  program differences, if any, across racial groups,  program perceptions, and  efforts to support and sustain core program components Each section of the report begins with an introduction and the evaluation question or questions addressed in the section. A list of the evaluation questions can also be found in the appendices at the back. The goal of the design was to provide accurate documentation of the magnet schools and programs and an evaluation study that is informative, useful, feasible and considerate of its participants. Professionally recognized evaluation standards guided the creation and content of the design, the manner in which data were collected and the reporting methodology. Study Participants, The evaluator collected a wide array of data across program participants, magnet schools and magnet programs to obtain multiple perspectives on the evaluation questions. An effort was made to identify representative samples and collect data from participants in a timely and efficient manner and to stay within budget. Although every school was not represented across all data collection activities, the evaluator was able to solicit input from 1324 people who had either impacted or been impacted by the schools and programs under study. One of the proposed goals in Year II will be to continue data collection across these groups and to add additional representation that would widen our understanding of the schools and programs. The chart below provides basic details of study participants. Magnet Cluster Stipulation Magnet Schools (6) MSAP Schools (4) Schools w/ Magnet Programs (7) Other Total Study Participants Magnet Schools and Magnet Program Evaluation 2005-2006 No. of Schools Teachers Principals District/ Magnet Leaders Parents Students Class Obs. Survey 6 4 7 18 266 152 230 648 6 4 8 18 4 1 5 10 114 140 254 51 36 51 144 283 111 394 HnM II 9 II II II Data Collection Activities. The research study centered around six data collection activities: (1) school and classroom observations, (2) review and analysis of school report cards, data and standardized test results, (3) collection and review of historical documents related to desegregation and magnet school issues, (4) the administration of student, teacher, parent and principal surveys, (5) district, school and magnet leadership Interviews, and (6) collection and review of student work. These activities and the data collection methods utilized are summarized below. II Data Collection Activities Magnet Schools and Magnet Program Evaluation 2005-2006 II II II II II Activity Observations Site Visits Surveying Review Data/ Documents Interviews Focus Groups (field tested) District Level 16 57 16 School Level Principals/Magnet Coordinators 68 16 54 38 Classroom Level Teachers/Students 144 648/394 119 54/103' 4 5 teachers/19 students Parent 146 108 Other 2 3 6 2 8 II II 1, Site Visits. The evaluator conducted 68 site visits over 38 days across the 18 schools under study. The objectives of the initial visits were to establish contact with the principals and/or the magnet coordinators, share the evaluation goals and data collection plans, answer questions, learn about the school and its program, and do a thorough school walk-through of each school. During subsequent visits, the evaluator had in-depth conversations with principals and magnet leaders about their program challenges and successes. II II These site visits were essential for a number of reasons. They allowed the evaluator to observe the schools culture and climate, the number and types of student work displays in the hallways, school projects such as student gardens, and the number of students transported by buses to and from schools. The visits also provided opportunities to talk formally and informally with teachers, parents and students about their work and their programs. II II During the year, the evaluator also attended a number of school activities such as an evening music performance by students for their families, a faculty meeting. Open House, Principal Leadership Trainings, the Magnet Fair, and the High School Academic Signing Day ceremony at the Clinton Library. II lA. Classroom Observations. During her visits to the schools, the evaluator conducted 122 classroom observations. Initially, these were short five minutes classroom visits. As teachers became comfortable with an observer, the time spent in the classrooms stretched to 30-45 minutes. The evaluator focused on two areas. The first was the classroom learning environment - its organization (large/small student groupings) II ' The evaluator conducted informal, but substantive, interviews with teachers and students about their work. III 10 and teacher-student roles in the learning process. The second was lesson content, whether it was standards-based and had the magnet theme Integrated into what or how the students were learning. 2. Review of School Data and Standardized Test Results. To learn more about the students who attended these schools and programs, their behavior (discipline referral, suspensions), commitment to school (attendance) and academic achievement, the evaluator reviewed a wide variety of standardized-test results and other data. The Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District, 2005, Draft and the School Report Cards were especially valuable. Some examples of additional data the evaluator reviewed follow:  November 2005 Construction Report  Bond Projects  Little Rock School District Detailed Budget, 2005-2006,2003-2004, 2002-2003.  Magnet School Assistance Program Grant Proposal, December 2000  Enrollment Information - Student Choices  Little Rock School District Web Page  Magnet Applications Received During Initial Registration - Non-Black Applicants, First Choice. Entry Level Grade - 2002-2003 through 2006-2007  A History of the Little Rock School District  Little Rock School District, Pre-Kindergarten - Grade 12, Month-by-Month Reading \u0026amp; Mathematics, Curriculum Overview  Little Rock School District Efficiency Matrix, 03/24/06  The Little Rock School District. On the Path of Progress. December, 2005  School Summaries (18), Little Rock School District Web Page 3. Review of Historical Documents. The evaluator also found it helpful to review some of the court cases that impacted LRSDs policies and schools over the years. Some of those reviewed were\n Woods, H., \u0026amp; Deere, B. (1991). Reflections on the Little Rock School Case. Arkansas Law Review, 44(4).  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. Defendants, Mrs. Lorene Joshua, et all. Intervenors. Stipulation for Recommendations Regarding Magnet Schools. 1987  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. Defendants. Order. 1987  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. Defendants. Joint Motion. February 14, 1992  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et. al. Defendants. Memorandum Brief. February 14, 1992  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. Defendants. Order. March 5 , 1992.  Little Rock School District, Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. January 16, 1998  Little Rock School District, Plaintiff V Pulaski County Special School District, No. 1, et al. Defendants, Memorandum Opinion. June 30, 2004. 4. Surveys. The evaluator surveyed a number of stakeholders to learn what those closely involved with the magnet schools and programs thought of them, how much they understood their purpose, and what value they placed on them. The surveys provided information about respondents program knowledge and attitudes and insight into whether stakeholders, such as parents, would continue to enroll their children in a magnet program if it was altered or diminished. Aligned with the content of the evaluation questions, the surveys contained closed-ended (fixed answers) and open-ended questions or writing prompts. The closed-ended questions were more structured and confining, but easier to tally and report. The open-ended I n II 11 II questions elicited lengthy input which was harder to categorize and code, but provided greater depth of content. A brief summary of each survey type follows. II II II II Teacher Survey. Teachers shared their perspectives on the adequacy of their magnet-oriented professional development, how thoroughly they understood their program objectives and if they thought their magnet program was meeting the academic needs of their African-American students. In addition, they answered survey questions on whether the school/program was providing all students with a quality education and if they believed that the magnet program was an important reason why students applied to their schools. The survey contained 17 closed-ended and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions contained statements such as, / believe that our magnet classes and curricula motivate students to leani . Teachers were provided with six choices - Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree - and were asked to choose the one that most closely reflected their beliefs. Open-ended questions were similar to the following, What, if anything, has promoted/impeded full implementation of your magnet program?\". II II Parent Survey. This 15-question parent survey also contained closed-ended and open-ended questions. It asked parents to share their views about whether their children were receiving a quality education, if their childrens learning needs were being met and if the program was preparing the children for the future. In addition, the survey asked parents to describe their childs magnet program, whether it was important that the school had a magnet program, why they enrolled their child, and would they continue to send their child to the school if it no longer had a magnet program. II II Student Survey. Learning about students attitudes towards school and their motivation to achieve was also considered valuable. Adapting work done in the 199Os by Dr. Deborah Stipek (UCLA) and Dr. Heidi Gralinski (UCLA/Harvard University), the evaluator compiled a brief student attitude survey which asked students their views of their classroom environment, use of cognitive approaches that influenced their motivation to learn and their goal orientation. Students provided data on whether they liked school, if they learned in many different ways and if they wanted to learn as much as possible in their magnet classes. II Principal. The principals survey asked respondents for input in five areas - magnet demographics and and activities, what hindered and helped full program implementation, and school level marketing and recruitment activities. Examples of some of the questions or requests were: II II II  Unrelated to expenditures, what are two important core components of your magnet program ? Please explain.  What, if anything, has promoted/impeded full implementation of your magnet program?  Aside from the Magnet Fair, describe two ways you market your program and recruit magnet students..  How many buses deliver magnet students to your school daily?  Besides your attendance zone, how many other zones does your magnet student population represent? II II II II 5. Interviews. Both formal and informal interviews were important data collection activities for this evaluation. The evaluator interviewed all of the magnet principals, the MSAP Program Director and some site-based magnet coordinators and district leaders. Interviews tended to focus on program descriptions, changes that had occurred over time and a history of the challenges and accomplishments that the interviewees had encountered. There were three open-ended interview questions that inquired into (1) program responsibilities and activities, (2) implementation problems and successes experienced and (3) perceived outcomes. Typical questions were, Please, tell me about your program., What are some of your challenges?, What do you see as the main purpose or purposes of the program?, etc. Informal interviews such as talking with a teacher about a project her students were doing, sharing lunch with a II12 n school principal or talking with parents before a dinner honoring school volunteers provided additional input on aspects of the magnet programs and peoples perceptions of their effectiveness. H 6. Review of Student Work. During each school visit, the evaluator reviewed student work samples. The reviews provided answers to two questions: Were student work samples standards-basedproducts and to what extent was the schools magnet theme(s) integrated into student learning and instruction. H Bl Data Availability, Data Discrepancies and Data Analysis Bl Data Availability. A number of district and school site people generously provided data and assistance during the evaluation. There were instances, however, when the evaluator received contradictory sets of data on the same subject or received perplexing data. Most of the time, the person who sent the information satisfactorily explained the problem. When that did not happen, the evaluator, with the help of the Planning, Research and Evaluation staff, verified which data were accurate and which could not be used. Bl Data Discrepancies. Valid data are an absolute necessity for accurate reporting. In the case of magnet enrollment numbers, there are discrepancies in some of the data that were collected for this report. Most occurred with magnet programs that were embedded within the schools under study. The number of tagged magnet students within each school did not always reflect the magnet format of that school. If it was a magnet school format, then all students should have been tagged magnet students\nif it was an embedded magnet program, then only students in that program should have been tagged as magnet students. Bl Bi Bl In addition to the above discrepancies, some data sets the evaluator received from different district departments contradicted one another. This made it difficult to know which data were accurate or if discrepancies were the result of different ways a department organized the data or the result of different data collection schedules or requirements. In the case of the magnet programs and achievement outcomes, until there is a consensus regarding how many magnet students are enrolled in each of the embedded magnet programs and schools, the evaluator cannot track Benchmark achievement for that cohort of students. Bl Bl Data Analysis. The evaluator collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data from a variety of sources for the report. Descriptive statistics - measures of central tendency, frequency distributions, etc. - were deemed most appropriate for the quantitative data\nand, for these, graphs and charts were used to display findings. For the qualitative data  interviews, observations and open-ended survey input  the evaluator interpreted the data and organized the information into coherent categories, identifying themes and patterns. During interpretation, consistencies and differences were noted and any connections and relationships between questions and/or the answers across different groups were charted. Key findings were then presented in narrative form with accompanying charts and graphs. Bl Bl Bl Summary. In the end, the report uses multiple and varied data sets to generate descriptions and analyses of the Districts magnet school and programs. Although, at times, data sets spanned differing numbers of years, all provided longitudinal lenses into the magnet effort. The evaluator believes that the sum of all of the areas examined produced rich descriptions of magnet practices, perceptions and outcomes. Bl Bl Recommendation Create an accurate, centralized database for the Magnet Schools and Programs. Bl Bl Bl13 IN IN IN IN IN SECTION 11: MAGNET SCHOOLS AND PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN Section II: Magnet Schools and Program Descriptions IN IN14 Section II describes the magnet schools and programs studied in this evaluation and summarizes the data collected to answer four evaluation questions pertinent to this task. The questions are\nI. What is the nature and implementation level of the magnet programs at each of the 18 Magnet Schools and Specialty Magnet Programs being evaluated? 2. Are the Stipulation Magnet Schools and the MSAP Schools, in particular, continuing to reduce, eliminate or prevent minority group isolation within their schools? 3. Are all of the Magnet Schools and Programs providing students with the opportunity to meet State and/or District content and performance standards? 4. Are their any program participation differences between minority and non-minority groups within the 18 Schools and Programs? Introduction. In the Little Rock School District, parents who wish to enroll their children in a magnet program have a number of choices from which to choose. This section of the report will examine 16 of the magnet schools and program choices at length and review the remaining two programs as special situations. Magnet Schools and Programs LRSD offers its parents a number of educational choices. Full-scale magnet schools and schools with embedded magnet programs are among the most popular. Each school and program is unique, differing in types of themes, magnitude of implementation, school level, and funding. The evaluator examined 18 of the magnet schools and programs  six Stipulation Magnet Schools, four Magnet Schools Assistance Program full-scale Magnet Schools (MSAP) and seven Magnet Programs embedded in the school curricula of seven area schools. The Stipulation Magnet Schools had their genesis in the Little Rock School District, Plaintijf, vs. Pulaski Count Special School District No. 1, et al. Defendants, Mrs. Lorene Joshua, et al. Intervenors court agreement rendered in 1986. The agreement stipulated that six schools would be converted to full-scale magnet schools and would open their doors as such in the 1987-1988 school year. In 2001, the district converted four existing secondary schools into Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools after receiving a three-year, $7,056,075, MSAP grant from the U.S. Department of Education. The schools opened their doors as full-scale Magnets in 2001-2002. The district created the remaining seven school embedded magnet programs at different times over the last 18 years. The magnet schools and program.s offer a variety of specialized curriculum magnet programs. Magnet leaders selected themes that they hoped would be relevant and engaging and promote academic excellence and student diversity. Mission Statements. Although several magnet schools and embedded magnet programs have mission and/or vision statements of their own, at the district level, there is no similar statements for these entities. The LRSD offers parents and students multiple ways to learn about the schools and programs and how to apply for them, but nothing appears to be centrally available that clearly articulates the special mission of magnets or their goals and visions for the future. Strategic Plan. Mission and vision statements fall under the larger concept of strategic plans. In the document, On the Path of Progress, the district ha.s stated six guiding principles, each with related goals, II 15 II II and incorporated into it the core beliefs of an earlier LRSD Strategic Plan. The document provides guidance on the districts educational expectations and accountability plans. These broad expectations are helpful, but require magnet stakeholders to extract from them whatever they believe applies to their magnet programs. This could lead to multiple interpretations of the purpose the programs serve in the district and the degree to which they should be implemented and evaluated. II II Organizational Chart and Oversight. The district also has an organizational chart which displays the way work is distributed in the Little Rock School District and its reporting relationships. Nothing in the chart indicates how the magnet schools and programs fit in the organizational structure. This makes it difficult for the community and magnet stakeholders to gauge the weight the district gives these entities and to know who is responsible for overseeing and evaluating magnet programs and their outcomes. II II II Some magnet oversight duties fall under the jurisdictions of the Associate Superintendent for Elementary Schools and the Associate Superintendent for Secondary Schools. (The Magnet Review Committee, an outside entity, has exercised oversight for the six Stipulation Magnet Schools since their inception.) Other than general supervision, the evaluator is unaware of any centralized policies (although some procedures are in place) for how magnet programs are chosen, how new programs fit into the larger magnet network, and the extent to which the district periodically reviews and evaluates the MSAP Schools and embedded Magnet Programs to ensure long-term quality and sustainability. II II Summary. Parent access to comprehensive information on the magnet schools and programs plays an important role in determining whether the programs achieve one of their major magnet goals - student diversity. The more knowledgeable parents are, the more they might consider enrolling their children in a magnet program. To that end, the district should consider creating a document that articulates the programs mission and vision and a strategic plan that specifies governing principles and goals. The district might also consider creating a centralized Magnet Office and Director responsible for all of the non-stipulation magnet schools and embedded magnet programs. II Recommendations II 1. Create district-level Mission and Vision Statements and a Strategic Plan for the non-Stipulation Magnet Schools and embedded Magnet Programs. II 2. Create a district level Magnet Director who is responsible for the non-Stipulation Magnet Schools and embedded Magnet Programs. II II II II Nature and Implementation Levels of the Magnet Programs II II16 Several of the questions the evaluation sought to answer focused on understanding what the magnet schools and programs were about. This section of the report looks at the nature and implementation levels of the schools and programs, the attributes that characterize each and answers the following question.  B Evaluation Question 1: What is the nature and implementation level of the magnet programs at each of the 18 Magnet Schools and Specialty Magnet Programs being evaluated? B Nature of the Magnet Programs Work in Year I began with learning about the magnet schools and programs and building a detailed profile of each. These profiles contain basic information on the magnets curriculum theme(s), instructional program(s), and student populations. The report organizes the information under three school clusters - Stipulation Magnet Schools, MSAP Magnet Schools and Schools with embedded Magnet Programs. B Stipulation Magnet Schools Background. The evaluator reviewed six Stipulation Magnet Schools and their programs. Converted to full-scaled magnet in the late 1980s as part of the federal court agreement described earlier, the six schools set out to assist the district in achieving its desegregation goals through the creation of strong and appealing instructional themes that would promote diversity in the schools. The chart below lists the schools, their magnet strands and basic student population information. B Stipulation Magnet Schools and Themes - 2004-2005 School Magnet School Theme African-American Students Percent of Free/Reduced Lunch Students(SES Indicator^) Elementary Schools Booker Carver Gihbs Williams Middle School Mann Arts Magnet Basic Skills/Math-Science International Studies/ Foreign Languages Traditional Magnet Arts and Science 53% 52% 53% 52% 52% 63% 53.% 44% 34% 37% B High School Parkview Arts and Science 51% 22% B Data Source: School Report Card  2005 A brief description of each magnet school follows. 2 B SES = Social Economic Status IndicatorII 17 II IN IN Booker Arts Magnet School. Booker Arts Magnet School offers it 607 students an educational learning environment which couples learning, experiencing and performing the fine arts with the study of a standards-based language arts, mathematics, science and social studies curriculum. Booker Arts Magnet has a special focus on strengthening students reading abilities through the Reading Recovery, ELLA (Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas), Effective Literacy and Accelerated Reader programs. (Parent Letter, March 22, 2005, p. 1.) Its mission is to educate all students to the highest levels of academic performance, while developing divergent thinking and creativity, and fostering positive growth in social behaviors through integration of the curriculum and the fine arts. (Parent Student Handbook. Booker Arts Magnet School Mission Statement. 2005-2006, p. 4) IN IN IN Carvers Math-Science Elementary Magnet School. Carvers Math-Science Magnet School program offers 533 Kindergarten through 5\" grade students a full-range curriculum, with a focus on Science and Math. Reading is also a high priority. The Arkansas Comprehensive Literacy Model leads instruction, complete with a Literacy coach and two reading Recovery teachers. Carver Magnet also offers academic enrichment and each day Carver students attend at least one of ten specialty classes taught by certified specialty teachers in Art, Music, Math lab. Computer Lab, Science Lab, Gifted and Talented, Young Astronauts, Literacy/Research Science and others. (School Home Page, Internet, 05-06) IN IN IN IN Gibbs International Studies and Foreign Languages Magnet School. With a student population of 297 students, Gibbs is the smallest of the K-5 elementary magnet schools in this study. The magnet program at Gibbs specializes in International Studies and Foreign Languages and integrates the strands across all subjects. The goal is to challenge children to achieve high academic standards as they become good citizens of the world. The underlying philosophy of the program is a belief that people and cultures are more alike than different. Students at Gibbs study the family life, beliefs and economic systems of different cultures and learn about the education systems, social controls, technology levels and basic needs of their societies. In geography, they study a variety of simple and complex subjects such as place, location, regional migrations and man/land interaction. Each year, the school chooses an over-arching theme such as Leadership which is incorporated across the childrens studies and is tied to their magnet strands. IN IN Williams Traditional Magnet School. Williams Traditional Magnet Elementary School offers its 460 K-5 students a comprehensive basic skills education in a structured, child-centered, and safe environment. The oldest magnet program in the area, the schools goals are to develop student achievement to the highest level, reduce any achievement gaps that exist between its minorities and non-minority students and provide equitable access to academic and co-curricular activities. The school promotes responsible citizenship, critical thinking and lifelong learning. IN IN Williams Magnet School enhances its standards-based core curriculum program with additional offerings such as a Compass Learning Computer Lab, Accelerated Reader and Math programs. Junior Achievement, Certified P.E., Art and Music Programs, a Gifted/Talented program. Peer Tutors/Ambassadors, and Junior Great Books. (Williams Traditional Magnet Schools, A Choice for Excellence\", Brochure, June, 2004) The school also has a number of extracurricular activities and events that help develop students skills and abilities and a strong parent/community involvement program IN IN IN Horace Mann Arts and Science Magnet Middle School. In addition to a regular middle school curriculum, Mann Magnet Middle school offers its 850 students specialty magnet programs in the arts and sciences. Students whose area of concentration is the arts may select from Art, Band, Choir, Dance and Orchestra, III, and III, Drama and Theatre classes. Art students regularly perform in school and community events. Science magnet students may enroll in Pre-AP or regular Science and Lab Sciences 6, 7 and 8. The magnet students also visit the Coleman Crystal Mines, Huntsville Space Camp, and the Mid-America Science Museum and participate in the annual Science Fair. IN18 Parkview Arts and Science Magnet High School. A Stipulation Magnet High School, Parkview is currently serving 1129 students and offers them a standard academic curriculum and two magnet programs that specialize in the visual and performing arts (68 classes) and the sciences (18 classes). A number of Parkviews teachers also integrate the arts into their students learning and instruction. All students meet state standard graduation requirements while choosing from a wide range of course electives. Students enrolled in the Fine Arts Program select a visual or performing arts emphasis. If art students selects music as their area of emphasis, they may choose from the following classes: Brass Tech, Woodwind Tech, and Percussion Tech\nConcert Band, Beginning Orchestra, Orchestra I, Intermediate Orchestra, Advanced Orchestra, Symphonic Orchestra, Jazz History, Jazz Ensemble, Music Theory/History I, Music Theory II, III, and IV (AP), Music Technology, Composition, and Conducting. The Science Magnet Program combines high tech specialty science courses with a magnet curriculum that prepares students for an undergraduate, pre-professional, or technical major in medicine and health. (School Brochure, 2005-2006). p p p p p p p R Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools (MSAP) RII 19 II II Background. With the award of a federally-funded Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) grant in 2001, the Little Rock School District converted four secondary schools in the Southwest quadrant of the city into full-scale magnet schools - J.A. Fair and McClellan High Schools\nCloverdale and Mabelvale Middle Schools. II II Although there was a mix of Caucasian and African-American families living in Southwest Little Rock at the time, the majority of students attending the four schools were African-Americans. By converting the schools to whole-school magnets with unique programs, the district hoped to attract the area's Caucasian students, many of whom were being home-schooled or were enrolled in private or county schools. The chart below provides information on African-American enrollment and the percent of students on Free/Reduced Lunch, a social-economic indicator. If there are noticeable changes in the data, the area is shaded. II Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools - 2003-2005^ II School Percent of African-American II Middle Schools 2003 Students 2004 2005 Cloverdale 86% 84% 82% II II II II II II II II II Mabelvale High Schools J. A. Fair McClellan 76% 75% 81% 79% 93% 81% 93% 85% 92% Percent of Free/Reduced Lunch Students (SES Indicator) 2003 78% 71% 38% 56% 2004 2005 73% 70% 45% 54% 86% 75% 54% 56% Magnet Schools Assistance Programs have several goals. They seek to promote minority de-isolation in schools, encourage systemic school reform, facilitate opportunities for students to meet state content and performance standards, expedite implementation of innovative educational strategies and encourage extensive career education. The federal grant award of $7,056,075 allowed the district to convert the four Southwest schools to full- scale MSAP Magnet schools. The U.S. Department of Education distributed the money over a three year period and the district portioned out money to the four schools according to the size of the school and the needs of the magnet programs. At the end of the time, not all of the money had been spent so the district requested and received a 4'*' year extension of the work. All of the schools had multiple magnet themes/strands, with the middle schools strands duplicating the themes of their high school counterparts. The display below provides details. School Magnet School Theme School Magnet School Theme II 3 School year 2004-2005 was the fourth and last year of MSAP funding for these four schools. II20 Middle Schools High Schools Cloverdale Engineering, Multimedia and Economics McClellan Engineering, Multimedia and Business Finance Mabelvale Medical Studies, Environmental Science and Information Technology J.A. Fair Environmental Science, Information Science and Systems EiVHirinB and Medical Science School Policies. MSAP schools accepted students of all ability levels and required them to complete the general course work mandated by the district and state as well as choose a specialty in one of their schools magnet strands. Students who enrolled in MSAP schools learned about the magnet strands in required introductory courses during their first year. At the end of Year I, they were asked to select one magnet strand in which to specialize. Upon graduation from Middle School, they could enroll in an MSAP High School which offered studies in their area of specialization. For example, Environmental Science magnet students at Mabelvale Middle School who studied ecosystems, global ecology and environmental practices could move into the more advanced J.A. Fair Environmental Science High School program where they could continue their studies and also participate in an internship in their field.  Of the $7,056,075, about 35%, or two million dollars was earmarked to build science and/or technology labs and secure the equipment and supplies needed to operate them. Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, for example, spent approximately $ 200,000 to set up three labs to support its Mulit-Media, Engineering and Economics magnet themes. These labs were equipped with tables and chairs, laptop and desktop computers, monitors, printers, digital cameras, palm pilots, VCRs, multi-media projectors, smart boards, software, books, materials, etc.  The MSAP budget also allotted as much as $120,000 per school for magnet-related professional development. Some of it supported teacher training in magnet class content such as medical investigations, graphic design, multi-media, environmental science. Other money was dedicated to training in innovative instructional methods such as Project Based Learning, Scientific Inquiry, Thematic Teaching and Inquiry and Curriculum Mapping. Using information found in the schools brochures and on the district website, each school is briefly described below. jl Cloverdale Magnet Middle Level Academy. Established in 1956 as an area school, Cloverdale Magnet Middle School currently offers its 636 students three magnet areas of study - Economic, Engineering and Multimedia. Funded in 2001-2002 through a federally funded Magnet Schools Assistance Program grant, the programs provide students with hands-on learning experiences in three state-of-the-art labs. Students study banking and finance, develop entrepreneurial skills, study graphic design and plan and implement desktop publishing projects. l! Mabelvale Magnet Middle School. Located in Southwest Little Rock, in 2005-2006, Mabelvale provided its 613 6'*', 7* and 8* grade magnet students with a variety of educational programs. Recently completing its fourth year as a Magnet School, Mablevale used its federally funded MSAP grant to create three specialty magnet programs - Environment Science, Medical Studies, and Information Communications Technology. Magnet leaders at the school believe that these programs are not only offering students relevant and engaging learning opportunities, but are preparing them to enter the workforce of tomorrow. H nI 21 II IN Mabelvale uses a block schedule rather than a traditional class schedule. Over a two day period, for example, students take eight classes, four each day for approximately an hour and a half. The longer class periods allow students time to work on magnet projects and study subjects in depth. The school also organizes students in academic teams that work with the same core subject teachers. This creates a more intimate and individualized learning environment for Mabelvale magnet students. IN IN IN IN J.A. Fair Systems Magnet High School. J. A. Fair offers it student body of 1169 students a three-strand magnet program. In addition to the magnet requirements, students complete the state mandated core curriculum. During their freshman year students learn about the magnet strands through two introductory courses. After completing the courses, students must decide which magnet specialization they will follow: Environmental Science, Information Science and Systems Engineering or Medical Science. If they select Environmental Science, they will study problems that affect the health of the earth and work outside and in the Environmental lab. If students choose Information Science and Systems Engineering, they will learn about networks and computer technology and the importance of circuits and switches, microprocessors, fundamentals of networking and technological trends.. (J.A. Fair School Brochure, 2005, p. 5) Students who focus on Medical Science will be actively engaged in hands-on activities in an on-campus interactive Medical Sciences Lab as well as visit local health facilities and laboratories. (Ibid., p. 5j IN IN IN McClellan Magnet High School. With its current enrollment of 864 students, McClellan Magnet High School offers its students three magnet academies - Business Finance, Engineering, and Multimedia. In addition, to assist the transition from middle to senior high school, all freshman become part of the Freshman Academy and have their classes in a school wing of their own. Students in the Business Finance Academy study banking, stocks and bonds, and financial planning. Those in the Engineering Academy participate in the Project Lead the Way program which challenges students to solve a variety of engineering problems using state-of-the art computer labs and specialized engineering equipment and software. The Multimedia students work on creative assignments using sophisticated computer software to help them design and create commercial grade publications and websites. IN MSAP Schools  Impediments to Program Implementation IN IN Interviews with magnet leaders and teachers made it clear that the districts bond-funded school construction projects negatively impacted the start of all but one of the MSAP programs. Since all of the magnet themes utilized laboratories as their base, timely construction of the schools labs was essential for full program implementation. When it was apparent that some labs would not be ready until late in the second or even the third and last year of the grant funded programs, schools had to consider spending money on temporary quarters, thus diluting their funding, or wait until construction was completed. The schools opted to wait. IN IN The construction of J.A. Fairs Magnet Environmental Science Lab and Magnet Medical Science Lab is a good example of the problems the magnets faced. Construction did not begin on the two labs until the beginning of the 3\"* and final funded year of the magnet program. Data from interviews and surveys put the move-in date at nine weeks before the end of the school year. Even then, only the shell was completed\nequipment then had to be installed. During the following extension year, in April, 2005, there was still some construction taking place when the evaluator visited the labs. The area in back of the labs was mostly dirt and renovation was in progress on one of the parking areas. The following chart summarizes information found in a seven page memo entitled November 2005 Construction Report - Bond Projects on the districts website. Upon reviewing the data. It appears that, for a few schools, the labs were only one of several construction projects at the sites and the schedules estimated completion dates refer to entire construction projects. Consequently, lab completion and movein dates may have been earlier. IN LRSD Bond Construction Projects/Grant Funded MSAP Magnet School Programs Years N22 20012004 + Extension Year - 2004  2005 Bond Projects That Have Been Completed Cloverdale Middle School Mabelvale Middle School J. A. Fair High School McClellan High School Type Major Renovation and Addition Renovation 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition Classroom Addition Cost $1,393,822 $6,851,621 $3,155,640 $2,155,622 Estimated Completion Date November, 2002 March, 2004 August, 2004 July, 2004 The comments from surveyed principals and teachers supported the finding that lack of facilities impeded the MSAP Schools ability to implement their magnet programs. A few examples of their input follow: A. During Grant-Supported Years B The Little Rock School District did not begin the construction of our Environmental and Medical Labs until the beginning of the 3'' and final year of the MSAP grant. The labs were ready, (partially) for us to move into 9 (nine) weeks before school was out.\" Lack of getting facilities (until) last year of the grant.  Late construction projects  Equipment (late), Programs (late), one classroom not completed on time.  Timeliness in securing some items through district bid process.  B When Funding Ceased. In surveys and interviews, some respondents mentioned that just as they were getting started, their grant funding expired and the district did not allot any money explicitly for their magnet programs. Any funding for the programs had to come from their general school funds which meant that money that went to the magnet programs was money taken away from something else. As a result, after federal funding ceased, all of the MSAP Magnet programs were downsized to some degree and student access to the programs was impacted. In interviews, the evaluator heard that trained magnet staff had to be cut, one school had gone from six to three magnet teachers (and possibly to one next year), supplies were dwindling, and equipment was in need of repair or being dismantled. Although they are general comments, some of the following survey examples captured the outlook of some.  District has not provided continued monetary support...  Board and Administration have not supported the ongoing program, (and) have caused significant leadership turn over within the program ... Embedded Magnet Programs PIl 23 II II II Background. Like full-scale magnet schools, magnet programs that are embedded in an area schools curriculum encourage student diversity and attempt to offer high quality educational opportunities and educational choices that meet students interests and talents. This section of the report briefly describes the six embedded Magnet Programs evaluated in this study. As background, the chart below provides each schools magnet theme and the number of African-American and Caucasian students tagged by the Department of Computer Information Services as magnet students. IN Some of the information in the chart reflects an unresolved problem with Year I data because schools that are labeled magnet schools appear to have very few magnet students. Embedded Magnet Program Themes and Tagged Magnet Student Numbers - 2004-05  2005-06 IN School Level Magnet Theme IN IN IN IN IN IN Elementary King Romine Washington Middle Dunbar Henderson High School Central Magnet School embedded in School Name Yes No No. of African-Am Students Tagged as Magnet Students 04-05 05-06 No. of Caucasian Students Tagged as Magnet Students 04-05 OS-O6 High Intensity International Studies (Interdistrict School) Computer Science and Basic Skills (Interdistrict School) Basic Skills Math- Science Magnet (Interdistrict School) Gifted/T alented International Studies Health Science Magnet International Studies 10 23 15 16 46 51 154 131 73 229 48 131 167 241 X X 4 8 7 0 0 X X 6 1 1 X X 4 9 IN Data Source: Department of Computer Information Services - Number of Students Tagged as Magnet IN IN Martin Luther King, Jr., Interdistrict Magnet Elementary School. Opened in 1993, Martin Luther King, Jr. Interdistrict Magnet elementary provides its tri-district students with a unique approach to learning. Standards-based thematic units in core subjects help students make natural connection during the learning process, promote interdisciplinary inquiries and require challenging projects. In addition, students participate in a variety of programs and specialty classes. King offers students STAR Math and Reading which are computer based programs that identify and monitor students reading and math levels and reinforce their skills in both areas. Project SOAR, a second program, assists teachers and students in identifying their learning and instruction needs and monitor what is working and what is not. King students may also participate in music, art and physical education classes. All K-2 students participate in a weekly enrichment program and 3\"-5'*' students have a Gifted/Talented program available to them. IN Romine Computer Science and Basic Skills Interdistrict Elementary School. Established in 1963, Romine Interdistrict Elementary School offers its currently enrolled 365 interdistrict students a program that focuses on basic skills and computer science. Romine supports its basic skills emphasis with added features24 like the Arkansas Reading Program, a Gifted mathematics program and use of a computer lab under the direction of a certified technology specialist. The Lab offers students the opportunity to reinforce their reading, math and language arts skills and become accomplished computer users. With the integration of the literacy and math curriculum and additional use of technology into the classrooms, Romine believes it has created an engaging learning environment that will motivate students to become successful learners. H B Booker T. Washington Basic Skills and Math-Science Magnet Interdistict Elementary School. Able to serve approximately 850 students, Booker T. Washington Elementary School was first established in its current facility as an incentive school in 1989. In 1990-1991, it introduced its Basic Skills/Math/Science magnet program and became an Interdistrict Elementary School serving students from all three Pulaski county school districts. To support its Math-Science magnet program, the school established partnerships with the Little Rock Wastewater Utility, Project WET, Arkansas Game and Pish, Project WILD, UALRs Department of Physics and Astronomy, and the Aerospace Education Center. Through these partnerships, students are able to not only learn about science and mathematics in the classroom and their two Math Labs and two Science Labs, but see how what they are learning is applied in science and industry. B   Dunbar Gift and Talented International Studies Middle School. With a current enrollment of 811 students, Dunbar Middle School offers all students a standard middle school curriculum and at least one required foreign language interdisciplinary elective each year. Dunbar also has embedded in its curriculum a Gifted and Talented International Studies magnet program. Students enrolled in the program take accelerated mathematics, science, social studies and English. They have access to more than 25 electives and over 30 activity clubs. Dunbar is also supported by a strong volunteer group that donates 40+ hours per student per year to the school. B B B Henderson Health Science Magnet Middle School, In addition to its regular school curriculum, Henderson Health Science Magnet provides students with the opportunity to learn about health science and potential career opportunities through its magnet program. Magnet students study Basic Anatomy and Physiology, Microscope Use, Diseases  Prevention and Treatments, Disorders of the Human Body, Current Trends in Health Care, Health Careers and Health Care Exploration. (School Brochure, 2005) Students can also job shadow and learn more about the Health Sciences and their practices in their Health Science Club activities. B Central International Studies (IS) High School. Central High School International Studies Magnet Program seeks to prepare its students for participation in a global society. Along with the multi-year study of at least one foreign language. Central High requires that its magnet students take courses in Global Insights, American History, and International Relations/Contemporary Issues. In addition, Centrals magnet students can take elective classes in subjects such as World Geography, World History, Comparative Government, Global Economics, Physical Geology/Environmental Science, Drama, and International Studies. With a working knowledge of history and geography, the schools magnet leaders hope that Centrals I.S. students will be able to relate to people from different cultures, learn to communicate in at least one foreign language, and be capable of analyzing complex global issues. B B B Program Implementation Levels Each of the magnet schools and magnet programs in this study has a unique history, purpose, structure and funding level. These factors make it difficult to compare one school with another. However, in reviewing the data, the evaluator observed implementation trends across the sets of schools/programs (Stipulation B^ B BII 25 II Magnet Schools, MSAP Magnet Schools, and Schools with Magnet Programs). This section of the report summarizes a few of these trends, while later sections supplement the summary. II II There were two areas that provided data on the level to which the schools were implementing their magnet programs. The first was the degree to which magnet class offerings impacted students educational choices. The second was the extent to which the faculty integrated magnet themes across the curriculum. II II 1. Magnet Class Offerings. Observation and interview data indicated that the magnet programs, whether all-school or smaller embedded programs had varying degrees of impact on the schools course offerings. As a group. Stipulation Magnet schools had the strongest instructional impact because they were able to offer more magnet classes than the MSAP schools or schools with embedded magnet programs. For example, students enrolled in Parkviews Arts and Science Magnet School could chose from among 68 visual and performing arts classes if they were specializing in the Arts and 18 specialized science classes if they were enrolled in the Science magnet strand. II II Booker Fine Arts Magnet, a Stipulation Magnet School, offered 30 fine arts classes to its Kindergarten through 5* grade students. Besides their regular curriculum course work kindergarten students, for example, had classes in Creative Movement, Drama, Rhythm Instruments, Violin, Vocal and Visual Arts. Children in third and fourth grades took Creative Movement, Drama, Piano and Vocal or Stringed Instruments, and Visual Arts. In the music area, fifth grade students could choose to enroll for the year in either Band, Choir, Piano or Stringed Instruments. II II II II II Among the remaining schools and programs, the impact on course offerings varied. Central High School, for example, offered its magnet students a number of classes such as: Multicultural Literature, World Geography, Comparative Government and Politics, World Culture, French, Spanish, German, Latin, African/African American History, World History, Global Studies. Before funding ceased the MSAP schools offered its students a number of magnet classes and currently still offer several classes in their magnet strands. Mabelvale Magnet Middle Schools, for example, offered the following magnet classes: 6* Grade - Eco-Journeys (Environmental Science)\nSPRINT! (Seeing Productivity Results in Networking Technologies) (Technology)\nVoyages (Medical/Health) 7'* Grade - Earth Quest (Environmental Science)\nBYTES (Building Your Technology Education Successfully) (Technology)\nMEDICS (Medical Exploration for Developing Informed Choices) (Medical/Health) II Grade ~ Environmental Science (Environmental)\nPRISM (Presenting Research In Specific Media) (Technology)\nM.A.S.H. (Medical Applications for Sustaining Health) (Medical/Health) II II The number of specialized magnet classes embedded program offered varied. In addition to their regular sciences classes, Henderson Health Sciences Magnet students took the following year long classes\n6* Grade - Introduction to the Health Sciences: Cells the Building Blocks of Life, Basic Anatomy \u0026amp; Physiology, and Microscopes II 7\"* Grade - Diseases and Disorders of the Human Body. Diseases, Conditions, and Disorders of Several Systems, Prevention \u0026amp; Treatment. II g\"' Grade - Health Careers and You: History, Current Trends and the Future of Health Care, Legal II M B B B B IBIl26 \u0026amp; Ethical Principals, Health Care Exploration v King Elementary was unique in that it integrated its High Intensity interdisciplinary magnet theme across all subjects and grade levels. Teachers created and used thematic units that incorporated core content subject matter with other subjects such as art, computer graphics and creative writing. 2. Magnet Theme Integration. - During classroom observations, the evaluator tracked the level of magnet theme integration into schools regular curriculum. Although there were indications across a number of schools that theme integration crossed curricula areas, the evaluator observed the most consistent and richest integration of magnet themes across the set of Stipulation Magnet Schools. Since the group consisted of well-established full-scale magnet schools, it was not unusual that their teachers integrated their schools magnet themes school-wide. B The evaluator observed several classes at Booker Arts Magnet School. During the observations, teachers often integrated fine arts into other subjects. The evaluator observed, for example, a Language Arts class where the students had read a story about an artist and were writing summaries of what they had learned about his life and work. At the time of the observation, some students were completing their writing assignment, while others were beginning to work on an illustration of the artist or his work using information they had learned from the story. In another class, first graders had completed their studies of the solar system and had illustrated what they had learn with a drawing of the planets. Their drawings demonstrated that the teacher had asked them to draw the planets in correct order and according to scale. B At Parkview Arts and Science Magnet, the evaluator observed a German class for 20 minutes. The students were in the process or had just completed reading an essay in German about an artist who drew cafe scenes of Germany. The teacher asked the class to write a summary in German of what they had learned about the artist and his drawing and complete the assignment by drawing a similar depiction of life in America. B At the MSAP Schools and schools with embedded Magnet Programs, the evaluator observed varying levels and types of integration. The magnet themes at these schools and programs did not always cross into core curriculum areas, but the teachers of the specialty classes did require that their students use their Literacy and mathematics skills to demonstrate what they had learned. Magnet students designed, wrote and presented oral summaries of their International Studies assignments at Central High School. At Cloverdale Middle School, Information Technology magnet students used technology software to analyze budgets and their mathematics skills to make life decisions in a role-playing assignment. They also used the Internet to research the history of Little Rock and used the word processor to write a summary of their findings. B B B BII 27 II II Minority Group Isolation II II Since their inception, Magnet Schools have played an important role in attracting substantial numbers of students of different racial backgrounds to public schools. With a goal of promoting educational excellence through specialized curriculum programs, magnet schools offer parents and students with special interest and talents a number of educational choices. This study examined ten LRSD magnet schools of choice  six court Stipulation Magnet Schools created in the late 1980s, and four federally funded MSAP Magnet Schools converted from existing schools in 2001. This section examines the status of diversity in these schools. II II Evaluation Question 2: Are the Stipulation Magnet Schools and the MSAP Schools, in particular, continuing to reduce, eliminate or prevent minority group isolation within their schools? II II Stipulation Magnet Schools. Over a recent five year period, the six Stipulation Magnet Schools have maintained a racial/ethnic balance across their student populations. The graph below compares the equally weighted mean percentages of the six Stipulation Schools racial/ethnic distributions in the baseline school year of 2000-2001 to data from school year 2004 - 2005. It also displays the six schools against the district mean percentages for the same two years for additional comparison purposes. II The data are organized under two racial/ethnic groups similar to how the Federal Courts handling the Little Rock School District desegregation case references the groups. In the graph below, the designation, NonAfrican-Americans, refers to Caucasian, Hispanics and Other. II II II II II II 100 c ,2  \u0026lt;A 5 v a c o 4) 0. 80 60 40 20 68% 53% I African American stipulated Magnet Schools Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution Averages 2000-01 vs 2004-05 (Due to rounding, all pecentages did not add up to 100%) 53% I 69% 47% 32% NonAfrican American (2000-2001) African American 48% 31% Non- African American (2004 *- 2005)  Stipulated Schools  District Average 0 I On a school-by-school basis, the six Stipulation Schools maintained stable and balanced racial/ethnic student populations over the most recent five-year period. See chart below for details.28 H H Stipulation Magnet Schools Racial/Ethnic Distributions 2001-02 - 2005-06 School African-American Students Non-African-American Students 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 M   Booker Carver Gibbs Williams Mann Parkview 54% 53.5% 52% 52% 52% 49.5% 53% 53% 51% 51% 52% 50% 55% 54% 52% 52% 50% 51% 54% 52% 53% 52% 50% 51% 54% 54% 53% 51% 50% 50% 46% 46.5% 48% 48% 48% 40.5% 47% 47% 49% 49% 48% 50% 45% 46% 48% 48% 50% 49% 46% 48% 47% 48% 50% 49% 46% 46% 47% 49% 50% 50% Bl Data Sources: Planning, Research and Evaluation Department and Student Registration Magnet School Assistance Program Magnet Schools (MSAP). Over a four-year time period there has been no noticeable change in the MSAP schools racial/ethnic distribution averages. The schools have not reduced, eliminated or prevented minority group isolation within their schools over the last four years. However, although the de-isolation of minorities was a major goal of the MSAP grant, there is evidence that these schools never really were able to fully implement their magnet programs during grant funded years and are now struggling to maintain their magnet programs as full-scale curriculum entities. Bl The graph below compares the equally weighted mean percentages of the four MSAP schools racial/ethnic distributions in school year of 2000-2001 to data from school year 2004 - 2005. It also displays the four schools against the district means for the same two years. The data are organized like the Stipulated Magnet data, with the designation Non-African-Americans defined as Caucasian, Hispanic and Other. BlIl 29 II II II II II II II II II II II II 100 90 80 70 84% w u o eo c 01 o 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 African American Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools (MSAP) Comparison of Racial/Ethnic Distribution Averages 20001-01 vs 2004-05 NonAfrican American (2000 - 2001) 85% i  MSAP Schools I  District Average Africen American I NonAfrican American (2004 - 2005) On a school-by-school basis, the four MSAP Magnet Schools were unable to maintained balanced racial/ethnic student populations over the most recent five-year period. See chart below for details. MSAP Magnet Schools Racial/Ethnic Distributions 2001-02 - 2005-06 School 01-02 African-American Students 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Non-African-American Students 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 Cloverdale Mabelvale J.A. Fair McClellan 88% 79% 79% 91.5% 86% 76% 79% 93% 84% 75% 81% 93% 82% 81% 85% 92% 82% 81% 86% 90% 12% 21% 21% 9.5% 14% 24% 21% 7% 16% 25% 19% 7% 18% 19% 15% 8% 18% 19% 14% 10% Data Source: Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department 30 Opportunity to Meet State and/or District Content and Performance Standards V If students are to achieve high academic levels, they must have access to rigorous standards-based curricula and opportunities to master the standards driving the content and performance level expectations. The evaluator collected data to answer the following evaluation question addressing this issue.  Evaluation Question 3: Are all of the Magnet Schools and Programs providing students with the opportunity to meet State and/or District content and performance standards? The Little Rock School District has begun to create a comprehensive standards-based Pre-K - 12 curriculum program to guide learning and instruction in its schools and classrooms. Centered around four core subjects, English, mathematics, science and social studies, the curriculum will be based on sets of curriculum maps and pacing guides that are currently being developed. These maps will delineate the skills and content teachers will follow and children will be expected to master. The newly defined curriculum will be aligned with state content standards which are currently being revamped by the state. Previously, the Arkansas State Department of Education provided schools with bands of curriculum standards and teachers had to identify the content that was appropriate for their grade levels. The state is now developing grade level content standards that teachers will use to guide their classroom instruction. The display below presents excerpts from preliminary work done on the districts Grade 4 Curriculum Overview and matches it to current state content standards for Grade 4 in Reading. B Comparison of the State Curriculum Framework and Content Standards for Grade 4 with an Excerpt from the LRSDs Grade 4, Month-by-Month Reading Curriculum Overview B State Framework - Strand: Reading. Standard 9 ~ Comprehension Students shall apply a variety of strategies to read and comprehend printed material. Graded - R.9.4.1 Organize prior knowledge and new information to make meaning of the text. Grade 4 - R.9.4.4 Revise mental pictures based on new informat if fl from the text. Little Rock School Distrii Grade Four - Reading / Curriculum Overview/ August A September  Raad for a variety of purposes /  Rrad daily /  Serect materials for reading on independent reading level-base on interest and prior knowlei ie  Form mental pictures with new information  Revise mental pictures with new information. Bl ,1II 31 II II II Classroom Observations. The evaluator conducted 122 classroom observations to collect data on this question. Early observations focused on the types of learning environments the schools had created\nlater and longer observations focused on whether curriculum content was standards-based, the levels of thinking asked of the students, and the role of the teacher and student in the learning process. Although the evaluator saw several lessons across grade levels and schools, there were not enough in-depth observations and data to answer this evaluation question fully. II II What is encouraging, however, is that the data did suggest that observed teachers were focusing on standards-based content, especially teachers in elementary schools. In K-5 classrooms, the evaluator observed students studying core literacy and math content and practicing their writing and computational skills. Many K-5 students were highly engaged in the learning process and activities teachers had organized often tapped students prior knowledge and required them to refine or expand their skill base. However, as the evaluators observations progressed through the grades, the evaluator observed mixed levels of quality and rigor. II II In the upper grades, the problem in some observations was not so much in content and whether it was standards-based, but in instructional pace and clarity of goals. Mixed in with observations of classes that were rigorous and standards-based, the evaluator observed other secondary classes where instructional content was thin. In these classes, it was hard to understand what the lesson was about and what the students were suppose to do and accomplish. II During Year II, additional time will be spent collecting samples of student work that are standards-based and conducting more classroom observations. II II II II II II II II II II32  Equitable Program Access  The question addressing equitable access to magnet programs is central to one of the most important purposes of magnets - the elimination of minority isolation. In the work completed during Year I, there were few indications that magnet program participation differences across racial/ethnic school populations existed in the schools. However, the evaluator was unable to collect enough data to render formal findings across all sixteen magnet programs. Consequently, this area of inquiry will go forward during Year II of the evaluation. The question will remain the same and reads as follows: Bl Bl Question 4: Are their any program participation differences between minority and non-minority groups within the 17 Schools and Programs? Of the data that the evaluator did collect, the history of Dunbars Gifted and Talented (G/T) Magnet program was the most interesting. Historically, Caucasian students outnumbered African-American students in this program. However, recently, Dunbars leadership has made noticeable strides in narrowing the G/T racial/ethnic enrollment gap. Past and current magnet leaders narrowed the gap by identifying and educating all S\"* grade G/T students and parents about Dunbars program. Leadership implemented an aggressive recruited plan. Dunbar administrators and representatives visited district elementary schools and addressed PTA and Town Hall meetings, explaining the program and answering questions about it. All fifth grade GT students were mailed invitations to shadow b* grade Dunbar G/T students for a day\ntheir parents received invitations to tour the school. At the schools Open House, G/T teachers talked with students and parents about the program and a program brochure and video-tape provided useful information to interested families. B Bl Bl Dunbar now has a more equitable enrollment distribution in its G/T program with the newly enrolled, 2005- 2006, sixth grade magnet group evidencing a much different racial distribution than the 8'*' grade group that enrolled as b* graders in 20032004. The chart below displays the positive results'*. Program Level Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Totals African-Am. Count 84 48 21 154 African-Am. Percent 43.5 42.9 24.4 Data Source: LRSD Student Registration 39.3% (average) Other Count 109 64 65 238 Other Percent 56.5 57.1 75.6 60.7% (average) Total 193 112 86 392 Max Capacity Vacancy -193 -112 -86 0^ 0 0 4 The format and information in this chart were provided by the LRSD Student Registration Department. The term Other signifies all racial/ethnic groupings other than African-American children. Caucasian students comprised the largest group of children in this category. Because district departments organize their data differently, the evaluator realizes that the data displayed in this chart has the potential of contradicting data provided by the Department of Computer Information Services that are displayed elsewhere. 5.,, Bl Maximum Capacity numbers are not set for Dunbars Magnet Programs.Il 33 II II Additionally, the G/T program has structures in place to meet varying achievement levels once students are in the program. The school offer three levels of skill-based instruction to magnet students of varying skill levels. In addition, Dunbar offers its G/T magnet students a number of different classes to accommodate differing strengths and interests. Learning how engaging and effective these classes are will be part of the work that takes place in Year II of the evaluation. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II34 Special Situations  The evaluation plan called for the study of 18 magnet schools and schools with embedded magnet programs. The task was to determine how well they functioned, how much they impacted academic achievement and how many students of different racial/ethnic backgrounds they attracted. It became evident early on that two of the 18 presented specials situations - Hall High School and Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet School. The two schools and their unique situations are discussed below. M Bl Hall High School Bl Hall High School was originally included in the list of magnet schools and magnet programs to be studied in this evaluation. However, although it has a University Studies Specialty program, Hall does not have a Magnet program and, at this time, should not be in the evaluation study.  What may have contributed to the belief that the school had a magnet program was the fact that the district applied to the U.S. Department of Education for a federally funded Magnet School Assistance Program (MSAP) grant for Hall. This was a complex, time-consuming undertaking that required district and Board approval, and had it been awarded, the MSAP designation would have made Hall a full-scale Magnet High School and all of its students, magnet students. However, the awards were competitive and the district (and its plan for Hall) was not among those funded that year. In addition, the continuing belief that Hall has a magnet program appears to be supported by the inclusion of its Specialty program in the three-page section of the Districts Website that discusses the magnet choices parents have available to them. B Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet School Background. Much of the data collection earmarked for the magnet schools and programs in the evaluation study did not apply to Rockefellers Early Childhood Magnet School. Rockefellers Magnet School is a stand-alone, fee-based school that serves a different population than the 16 other K-12 schools/programs in the study. The school accepts children as young as six weeks old and the children take no standardized tests, school data such as attendance and mobility are not particularly relevant, and race is no longer a placement factor although it was until the districts assignment component was released from court supervision a few years back. A summary of the program follows. Bl Rockefeller Early Childhood School. Rockefellers Early Childhood (EC) Magnet program is the only program in the district to enroll infants as young as six weeks old. Enrollment is open to children from the age of 6 weeks to four years old and children from all of LRSDs attendance zones may apply. There are six certified Early Childhood teachers and 18 trained Instructional Assistants. In addition to the school nurse, there are also six specialists available for consultations who have expertise in art, computers, music, media, counseling and physical education. The program can accommodate children with some special needs and the staff are trained in CPR and First Aid. At capacity, Rockefeller can enroll 108 students in its Early Childhood magnet. Available seats are organized and distributed in the following manner: Bl  14 seats available for Pl, the group of children six weeks to 2 years of age.  18 seats available for P2, 2 years olds (must be 2 yrs. old before Sept. 15)  36 seats available for P3, 3 years old  40 seats available for P4,4 years old Bl BIl 35 II II The chart below provides enrollment figures for school year 2005-2006. Over-all, the ethnic/racial distribution across the four levels is 63% African-American and 37% Other (Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, Native American or Mixed.) II II II II II II II II II II Program Level PI 6 wks - 2yrs. P2 2 yr. olds P3 3 yr. olds P4 4 yr. olds Totals African-Am. Count 23 26 64 African-Am. Percent 57.1 41.2 69.7 68.4 62.7% (average) Data Source: LRSD Student Registration Other Count 10 10 12 38 Other Percent 42.9 58.8 30.3 31.6 37.3% (average) Total 14 17 33 38 102 Total Capacity 14 18 36 40 108 Vacancy Rockefellers Early Childhood cuniculum program is aligned with the Arkansas Department of Human Services (a) Framework for Quality Care for Infants and Toddlers and (b) A Framework for Quality Care and Education for Children from Three to Five. The Infant/Toddler curriculum focuses on improving listening and speaking skills and vocabulary, the promotion of positive personal and social interactions, learning personal care routines, and experiencing hands-on art activities. The curriculum framework for ages three to five addresses (a) Social/Emotional Development, (b) Creative/Aesthetic Learning, (c) Cognitive/Intellectual Learning, (d) Physical Development and (e) Language. Children learn how to act independently and interact socially, are introduced to math, science, language arts and social studies content, learn about health and nutrition, engage in fine and gross motor skill-building, and have numerous opportunities to express their ideas about various topics and build language skills. 8 7 6 0 1 3 2 6 I I II II The schools EC leaders utilize the Early Childhood Environmental Rating Scales as a springboard for planning and implementing their programs and monitoring program outcomes. These scales were designed to help EC educators create developmentally appropriate learning environments for young children. They were the result of studies and research into the question of how to measure and assess the quality of EC programs and have become an acceptable measurement tool. The Infant/Toddler Environmental Rating Scale (ITERS) targets children 0-2 Vi years and the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) addresses children from ages 2 ^2-5 years. Both scales track a number of areas. The ECERS consist of 43 items organized into seven sub-scales. The sub-scales I  The format and information in this chart were provided by the LRSD Student Registration Department. The term Other signifies all racial/ethnic groupings other than African-American children. The largest group of children within this category were Caucasians. I36 address such program components as: Space and Furnishings, Personal Care Routines, Language- Reasoning, Interactions, Activities, Program Structure, and Parents and Staff.  Full Implementation - Promoted/impeded. The survey that principals completed ask them to write about what had promoted/impeded full implementation of their magnet program. Rockefellers principal cited that its adequate and qualified staff, including certified teachers and a veteran Early Childhood coordinator supported full implementation and program quality. The principal expressed concern about how the 2004 changes in LRSDs student assignment policy has impacted Rockefellers elementary school enrollment and diversity. Rockefeller is no longer allowed to keep students who begin in the EC program through to 5* grade. This has interrupted, what had been in the past, a steady flow of students into its kindergarten class. Now, the only EC children who can attend Rockefeller after the completion of their 4'* year in the EC program are those that live in Rockefellers attendance zone. B M n n Recommendation  Rockefeller Integrate Rockefellers Early Childhood Magnet School with Rockefellers Elementary School so that all children in the Magnet School have the opportunity to attend the Elementary School. n  Il 37 II II SECTION III II II II II II II II II II II II HI II 11 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT - COMBINED POPULATIONS GENERAL FINDINGS Stipulation Magnet Schools. The percentage of Stipulation Magnet School students Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics has steadily increased over time, with recent percentages ranging from high (62%-88% in Literacy) to moderate (43%-76% in mathematics) in the two areas. Although their mathematics percentages were lower than their Literacys, African-American students at the six Stipulation Schools also demonstrated increases in the two mastery levels in both subject areas. Magnet Schools Assistance Program Schools (MSAP) Over a recent three year period, the percentages of MSAP middle school and high school magnet students attaining Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics have increased. However even with the increases, at best, mastery levels for these groups of students were modest, with several mastery percentages still exceptionally low, especially in mathematics (4% -12%). (Across MSAP schools, recent Literacy Proficient and Above ranges were 19%-43%.) Comparison Results. In almost every instance across grade and school levels, the Stipulation Magnet Schools had higher percentages of students who were Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics than other schools in the study. However, it is important to remember that wherever there are data for schools with embedded magnet programs, the graphs display all-school data, not magnet student data. When it is clear how many magnet students there are in these schools, the graphs will be redone to reflect their benchmark results.38 H Section III: Student Achievement - Combined Populations  This section of the report examines achievement data for all students enrolled in the magnet schools and, if possible, the embedded magnet programs in the evaluation study. The information contained here attempts to answer the following question:   Evaluation Question 5: Have the Magnet Schools (Stipulation and MSAP Schools) and Specialty Magnet Programs been effective in improving students academic achievement?  The Little Rock School District uses two types of tests to measure student achievement, criterion-referenced tests (what a student knows) and norm-referenced tests (how a student compares to other students). Recent changes in both aspects of Arkansas testing program, changes in the cut points that govern student subject proficiency placement in its Benchmark exams, and the mandates of No Child Left Behind made tracking student achievement over time a challenge.   Criterion-referenced Tests. In 2005, the Arkansas Department of Education recommended and the State Board of Education approved new benchmark cut scores for its state mandated criterion-referenced Benchmark exams. Cut scores are the points that divide scores on tests into advanced, proficient, basic and below basic performance categories. With the new cut scores, a child whose test score two years ago put his performance at proficient may find that the same score now puts him down one category to basic in the same tested area. Proficiency levels, rather than raw test scores, are what are published for the public. The Arkansas Department of Education suggested cut score changes, in part, to reflect (a) changes in the states English/Language Arts framework which forced the reformatting of the 2005 Literacy exam and (b) to address the addition of Grades 3, 5, and 7 (new grade level tests and cut scores) to the testing schedule. Norm-referenced Tests. An earlier change also made the tracking of the second category of achievement exams, norm-referenced tests, difficult. In the 2003-2004 school year, the state replaced the Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition (SAT9) it had been using with another norm-referenced test, the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS). It is difficult to compare the results of one test with the results of the another as content is never exactly the same, the order and number of questions are different, and the wording and format of the multiple choice selections can vary.  RI A. Arkansas Benchmark Exams. Part of the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability program (ACTAAP), the Benchmark exams are criterion-referenced tests that measure the degree to which students have mastered, for example, the states Math and Literacy content standards. The state goal for each student is proficiency in all requirements at each grade level. Proficient students demonstrate solid academic performance for the grade tested and are well prepared for the next level of school. (Arkansas Department of Education, 2005 Arkansas School Performance Report, p. 3.) Previously administered to 4*, 6th and, 8* grade students, the testing program now includes 3', 5* and 7* grade students. However, since the purpose of this evaluation is to identify trends rather than single-year results, the graphs below display longitudinal data. In addition, the displays do not have the most recent 2005 results for the 4* grade because, for that year, the state changed how it categorized all student levels of proficiency and the change noticeably impacted 4\"' results, making the results for the most recent year moot.Il 39 II Stipulation Magnet Schools II II The percent of Stipulation Magnet School students Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics has shown solid increases over time, with current percentages ranging from high to moderate in the two subject areas.__________________________________________ II Elementary and middle school data are provided below. High School data are on pp. 36-37. II Stipulation Magnet Schools - Combined Population - Literacy II Academic Achievement Stipulated Elementary (4th) and Middle Grade (Sth) Magnet Schools Combined Populations Percent Proficient and Above  Literacy 100 90 86% 88% II II II II II II II II 80 I S c V u 2 Q. C V 2 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ihlllll.i Booker Carver Gibbs Williams Mann  2001  2002  2003  2004 Data Source Literacy/Math: Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District - 2005 - DRAFT Stipulation Magnet Schools - Combined Population - Mathematics Academic Achievement Stipulated Elementary (4th) and Middle Grade (6th) Magnet Schools Combined Populations Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics 100 w O o c \u0026lt;0 90 80 70 60 .\u0026amp; 50 o 40 u 30 76% 20 10 0 I II hll 1.1 Booker Carver Gibbs Williams Mann  2001  2002  2003  200440  Magnet Schools Assistance Program Magnet Schools (MSAP)  Over a three year period, the percentages of MSAP middle school and high school students attaining Proficient and Above performance levels have increased. However, even with the increases, almost all of the percentages were low, with mathematics mastery especially low.  I The following graphs display Literacy and mathematics Benchmark data by Combined Populations. MSAP Schools \"Combined Population - Literacy H Academic Achievement MSAP Magnet Middle Schools and High Schools Combined Population Percent Proficient and Above in Literacy 2003'2005 100  90 o 80 c \u0026lt;0 s o o 70 60 50 40 4) O V o. 30 20 10 33% 29% Cloverdale - 8th 43% Mabelvale - Sth 24% Fair - 11th 1 9% McClellan - 11th  2003  2004  2005 0 n Data Source: School Report CardsMSAP Magnet School - Combined Populations - Mathematics and Algebra I (End-of-Course-EOC) Academic Achievement Combined Population M SAP M iddle Schools (Sth) and High Schools (End-of-Course-EOC) Percent Proficient and Above in M ath (M S) and Algebra I (HS) 2003 -- 2005 100 90 80 o co ae o S c 70 60 50  2003  2004  2005 ce o 40 30 20 10 3% 4% 13% Mabelvale  Sth 19% Fair -EOC 12% 6% Cloverdale  Sth McClellan - EOC 0 I Data Source: School Report Cards 11 41 11 11 Stipulation Magnet High School, MSAP High Schools and High School with Magnet Program 11 11 Since each group in the evaluation only had one or two high schools in it, the academic achievement of each of the high schools will be reported together in this section. As stated earlier, the results from schools with embedded magnet programs such as Central High School will change to reflect only magnet student results, not whole school populations, once the exact number of magnet students is established.. 11 End-of-Course Literacy and Mathematics - Combined Populations - High Schools 11 11 Academic Achievement End-of-Course Data  Algebra I Combined Populations Percent Proficient and Above 2001 - 2005 11 11 11 w \u0026gt; O \"c (Q C 4) *5 c o uV CL 11 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005 11 7%. 29% 1% Parkview Stipulated Fair MSAP 18% 23% 12% 1%l McCellan MSAP Central Program 11 11 American College Test. Students who want to enter a public college or university in Arkansas often are required to take the American College Test (ACT) as part of their application process. A student can score anywhere from 1 to 36 on the English and mathematics tests and is allowed to take the tests more than once. The graph below displays the four high schools average 2004 and 2005 ACT scores for their Combined Populations. The scores of African-American high school students who took the test can be found further on with comparison data from national and state averages for the same two years. 1 42 K H ACT College Entrance Exam - Combined Populations  ACT College Entrance Exam Combined Population Composite Mean Scores 2004 and 2005  30 25 20 o o u (/)  s 15 o E u 10 20.5 20.5 16.5 16.6 16.1 16.4 21.3 22.1  2004  2005 Parkview Stipulated Fair MSAP McClellan MSAP Central Program 5 0 I I I J    n Data Source: LRSD Planning, Research and Evaluation Department1 II 43 II II Academic Achievement - Comparisons Across School Clusters IM In almost every instance across grade and school levels, the Stipulation Magnet Schools had higher percentages of students Proficient and Above in Literacy and Mathematics than other schools in the study. IM Elementary School (4) Comparisons - Literacy and Mathematics IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM IM too so 80 70 60 c O so  40 X 20 10 0 w 43% 31% 2001 2002 100 90 80 \u0026lt; 70 a  60 c S o o 50 40 S 30 20 10 0 Benchmark Achievement Data Stipulation Magnets and Schools wZ Magnet Programs Combined Populations Percetn Proficient and Above - Literacy 2001-2004 81.8% 69.8% 2003 2004  Stipulated Magnets  Schools w/ Magnet Pro-ams Benchmark Achievement Data Stipulated Magnet Schools and Schools w/ Embedded Magnet Programs Combined Populations - 4th Grade Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics 2001 - 2004 41.8% 2001 66.9%  Stipulated Magnets 53.4% 57.8% 45.9% 45.1%  Magnet Programs Only 29.3% 2002 I 2003 2004 44  Middle School (6\"' Grade) Comparisons - Literacy and Mathematics  6th Oade Benchmark Achievement Data All Students - All Ma^iet Fonnats Percent Proficient and Above - Uteracy  100 90 80  c o ^5 o IL 70 80 50 65.9% 49.1' B MSAP Schools 4) U O Q. 40 20 10 ia7% 13.8%^ ze% 2003 27.5% 2001 2002 2004 2005  IVbgiet Prepare Only  Stipiated h/bgaet X 0 !   6th Grade Benchmark Achievement MSAP Schcx\u0026gt;ls, Embedded Magnet Programs, and Stipulation Magnets Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics 100 90 SO c 0) '5 1 Q. 70 60 50 42.7% 0) uo Q. 40 X 20 10 0 1.6% 12.8% 10.9% 2002 2003 2004 11.3%  MSAP Schools  Magnet Programs Only  Stipulated Magnet 2001 2005 II 45 II II II Academic Achievement MSAP Middle Schools and High Schools Combined Population Percent Proficient and Above in MaUi.(MS) and Algebra I (HS) 2003-2005 II II o XI \u0026lt; c (0 100 90 80 70 60 II II II  u o  c o o o CL 50 40 30 20 10 3.4% 4.4% Cloverdale -Sth 13% Mabelvale -Sth 29% 37% 4.5% 19% LRSD - Sth LRSD- EOC 19% 4.5% Fair - EOC 5.9% 12% McClellan -EOC 02003  2004 02005 0 II In Year II of this work, the evaluator intends to expand analysis of magnet student achievement by selecting comparison schools and grade levels that have similar demographics and examine their achievement history. II II II II II II II - Il46   SECTION IIIA ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT  AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS I n GENERAL FINDINGS Stipulation Masnet Schools. Although their mathematics performance percentages were lower than their Literacys\nover time, the percentage of African-American Stipulation Magnet students who achieved mastery levels (Proficient and Above) in the two subject areas increased. In addition, high school students at Parkview Stipulation Magnet scored higher in their ACT Entrance Exams over a two year period than the national and state averages of African- American students who took the ACT exams during the same period. MSAP Schools. The percent of MSAP African-American students attaining Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics also increased over time. In Literacy, the middle school students fared better than the high school students, while the reverse was true in mathematics. However, for the most part, the percentage of students attaining Proficient and Above in both subject areas was low, especially in mathematics. Areas of Prosress. Although the percentage of MSAP students who were Proficient and Above in their Benchmark exams is low, the four MSAP schools have demonstrated progress in moving African-American students out of the Below Basic performance levels in Literacy and math. IIA: Academic Achievement - African-American StudentsIl 47 II II African-American Students. In addition to tracking Benchmark performance levels of all magnet school students, the evaluator also examined the Benchmark rankings of African-American students, since it is important to the district and schools that they serve these students well. II Stipulation Magnet Schools. Although their mathematics performance percentages were lower than their Literacys, over time, the percentage of Stipulation Magnet African-American students who achieved mastery levels {Proficient and Above) in the two subject areas has increased._____________ II Stipulation Magnet Schools - African-American Students - Literacy and Mathematics II Academic Achievement Stipulated Magnet Elementary (4th), Middle Schools (6th), District Levels (4th/6th) African-American Students Percent Proficient and Above in Literacy 2001 - 2004 II II II II II II II II II 100 90 80 73% 77% 79% c nc  oo \u0026amp;c  o 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ilihhl.i53% 374 114 41%  2001  2002  2003  2004 Booker Carver Gibbs Williams District Elem. Mann 19% District Middle Data Source: Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District - 2005 - DRAFT Academic Achievement Stipulated Elementary (4th) and Middle Grade (Sth) Magnet Schools African-American Students Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics 2001-2004 100 do 00 70  2001 a e u 2 60 50 40 30 20 10 44% 44% Booker Carver Gfcbs 58% 34% 49% 1% 31%  2002  2003  2004 Williams Mann  o .o I c  0 0 L I 4  I E II 1 J Data Source: Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District - 2005 - DRAFT 48 H MSAP Schools. The percent of MSAP African-American students attaining Proficient and Above in Literacy and mathematics also increased over time. In Literacy, the middle school students fared better than the high school students, while the reverse was true in math. However, for the most part, the percentage of students attaining Proficient and Above in both subject areas was low, especially so in mathematics.   MSAP Magnet Schools - African-American Students - Literacy and Mathematics  Academic Achievement MSAP Middle Schools and High Schools Percent Proficient and Above -- Literacy African-American Students 2003 - 2004  100  90 80 70 c a c o o \"S 60 50 40 34% 36% 30 28% 22%[ 20 10 Cloverdale Sth Mabelvale 8th 19% 21%  III Fair 11th McClellan 11th  2003  2004  2005 o 0  Data Source: School Report Cards n Academic Achievement African-American Students MSAP Middie Schools (Sth) and High Schools (End-of-Course- EOC) Percent Proficient and Above in Math (MS) and Algebra I (HS) 2003 - 2005 100 90 I I 80 c  c 4) O O 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 2% 5% 8% 15% 12%  2003  2004  2005 I 0% 2% 6% Cloverdale 6th Mabelvale 6th Fair EOC McClellan EOC c o 0 I Data Source: School Report Cards Areas of Progress IIl 49 II II Areas of Progress. Although the percentages of MSAP students who were Proficient and Above in their Benchmark exams are low, the four MSAP schools have demonstrated progress in moving African-American students out of the Below Basic performance levels in Literacy and mathematics. This is the lowest level of performance\nconsequently, the lower the percentage, the more at basic or above. I II MSAP Magnet Schools - African-American Students - Literacy - Below Basic II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 100 90 80 Academic Achievement African-American Students MSAP Middle Schools (Sth) and High Schools (11th) Percent Below Basic - Literacy 2003 - 2005 u in a CD O V m c  u  70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 35% 23% 28% 27% 48% 36% 30% 29%  2003  2004 Cloverdaie 8th Mabelvale 8th Fair 11th McClelan 11th I  2005 Data Source: School Report Cards MSAP Magnet Schools - African-American Students - Mathematics/Algebra I - Below Basic Academic Achievement African-American Students MSAP Middle School (6th) and High School (End-of-Course EOC) Percent Below Basic in Math (MS) and Algebra I (HS) 2003 - 2005 c S 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 84% Cloverdaie 6th 63% 66% 52%  2003  2004  2005 Mabelvale 6th Fair EOC McClellan EOC Data Source: School Report CardsI 50  Achievement Gaps. Although there were achievement gaps between African-American and Caucasian students in Literacy and mathematics, generally, the gaps were consistently larger in math than in Literacy for those enrolled in the Stipulation Magnet schools and the MSAP Schools. This phenomena will be studied in depth in Year II of the work. The graphs below provide a one year example of the problem. (Benchmark data for students in the embedded magnet programs are not displayed here because a complete list of these students is not yet available.)    Elementary School Benchmark Data African-American and Caucasian Students Stipulation Magnet Schools Percent Proficient and Above - Literacy Grade 4 -2004 c g H 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 93% 96% - Illi Booker Carver Gibbs Williams  African-Am  Caucasian Bl Bl M H 0 Data Source: School Report Cards 100 Elementary School Benchmark Data African-American and Caucasian Stipulation Magnet Schools Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics Grade 4 ~ 2004 90 89% 88% 80 70 60 c 0) u 50 40 30 20 10 44% Illi Booker Carver Gibbs Williams  African-Am  Caucasian 0 B Data Source: School Report CardsIl 51 II II Like the elementary schools, middle schools in the study have noticeable minority/non-minority achievement gaps in mathematics . The graph below is a one year example of the general trend. It is important to remember that data for Dunbar represent all African-American and Caucasian students rather than the smaller cohort of magnet students because that data were not available for them at this time. II Middle School Achievement Data African-American and Caucasian Students Percent Proficient and Above - Mathematics Grade 8 - 2004 II 100 90 80 II II II II 70 65% n o\u0026gt; w S y QI 60 50 40 30 20 10 8.8% 7% 40% 45% 21% 10% 3.4%| 9.3%^H  8.6%  African-Arn.  Caucasian Dunbar Magnet Program Henderson Magnet School Cloverdale MSAP School Mabelvale MSAP School Mann Stipulation Magnet 0 J Data Source: School Report Cards II II Other Gap Comparisons. African-American students at Parkview Stipulation Magnet and at Central High School scored higher in their ACT Entrance Exams over a two year period than the national and state averages of African-American students who took the ACT exams during the same period.______ ACT College Entrance Exam - African-American Students and Comparison Data II 1. Parkview High School - Stipulation Magnet Il ACT College Entrance Exam African-Am erican High School Students Mean Composite Scores 2004 and 2005 II II II II 20 19 16 15 National 16.7 16.7 Arkansas 1 8.2 19 Parkview S tip u la ted  2004 1 8  2005 II Data Source: LRSD Planning, Research and Evaluation Department II I I 52 M ii. African-American students at J. A. Fair and McClellan Magnet High Schools did not score as high in their ACT Entrance Exams as their state and national counterparts. M ACT College Entrance Exam African-American High School Students Mean Composite Scores 2004 and 2005  20 I  19 18  2004  2005 17.1 17 I 7 --------- 16.7 16.7 I I 16 16 16.2 15 16.3 National Arkansas Fair MSAP McClellan MSAP  M Data Source: LRSD Planning, Research and Evaluation Department iii. African-American students at Central High School which has an embedded magnet program outperformed their national and state counterparts in the ACT Exam in 2004 and 2005.  ACT College Entrance Exam African-American High School Students Mean Composite Scores 2004 and 2005 20 19 18.2 18  2004 17.1 17.3  2005 ::l U H I 15 National Arkansas Central Program H Data Source: LRSD Planning, Research and Evaluation Department I M II 53 II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II SECTION IV: PROGRAM PERCEPTIONS Section IV: Program Perceptions54  Section IV explores program perceptions and summarizes the data collected to answer the following evaluation question: n Evaluation Question 6: What are the following stakeholders perceptions of Magnet Schools and Magnet Programs (a) levels of implementation, (b) impacts, (c) strengths, and (d) weaknesses: n  parents/suardians  students  teachers  school/program administrators and leaders M RI Parents. Data on parents perceptions of magnet schools and programs contributed to a fuller understanding of the role magnets play in the districts educational blueprint. The evaluation team interviewed or surveyed 229 adult family members who had children in a Stipulation Magnet School or a regular school with a Magnet program. Parents who participated in the interviews were randomly selected\nthose who were surveyed were not. School administrators and teachers selected which classes would receive the parent survey to take home. RI n Interviews and surveys were anonymous. Respondents were not asked or given the option of providing their childrens school, teacher, or family name. However, the evaluation team did know which schools returned surveys and which schools had parents who were interviewed. w u The children of family participants in every school except the middle school were either attending a magnet school or were magnet students in schools with magnet programs. The middle school sample which was randomly selected and anonymous participated in the interviews, but it is not known if any of those interviewed had children in either of the schools two magnet programs. u The chart below provides other details. RI Stipulation Magnet School Sample Carver Gibbs Williams Parkview Schools with Magnet Programs Sample King________________ Washington Dunbar Central Data Collection Method Phone Interview X X X No. of Family Members RI Survey X X X X X 25 30 43 16 Total = 114 45 25 33 37 Total = 140 RI RI RI RI Survey and Phone Interview Protocol. The evaluator used surveys and interviews to collect participants perceptions of the magnet schools and programs. Cost-efficient surveys added breadth to the data 7 RI The individual number of respondents per question varied because every respondent did not answer every question. RI RIIl 55 II II collection\ninterviews added depth. The size of the sample was impacted by other data collection activities in the district and ever-present time constraints. The evaluator chose magnet schools and programs that were well-established and included samples from both elementary and secondary schools. II II The surveys and phone interviews collected information about participants familiarity with their magnet school and/or program, their rationale for choosing a particular magnet format, and their perceptions of its value. The survey contained 15 items\nthe interview protocol, 24. The extra interview questions solicited additional information such as, What is your relationship to the child?, \"Do you have any other children in a magnet school or regular school? and Do you live inside the Attendance Zone?. II Both data collection tools contained closed-ended, (a selection of answer choices were provided), and ppem ended questions (participants were free to answer as they liked). Some questions or requests solicited general information, e.g., Does your child like school?, and others specifically targeted magnets, e.g., Please describe the magnet program at your childs school. Participants also answered other questions such as the following: II II  Are your childs learning needs being met?  Do you believe your child is receiving a quality education?  Is it important to you that your childs school has a magnet program?  Would you continue to have your child attend the school if it no longer had a magnet program? Why? or Why not? II II The survey did not ask for race or ethnicity, but the interview protocol offered it as an option. Of the 105 interviewees who provided the information, 58% were African-American, 27% Caucasian, 3% Asian, 1% Hispanic and 11% Other. The childrens mothers, grandmothers and fathers were the ones most frequently at home and willing to be interviewed. II II Data Analysis and Display. Descriptive statistics were deemed the best fit for the quantitative data the team collected. Charts, graphs and narratives provide an explanation of the findings and accompanying recommendations. The qualitative, open-ended data were reviewed and organized under common themes and discussed in narratives that frequently contain examples of respondents input. (See Appendix for a complete copy of the parent survey.) II Major Findings. The major findings derived from the parent survey and Interview data were: II Sampled parents of children in Stipulation Magnet Schools . ..  could describe their magnet program better than sampled parents of children in regular schools with a magnet program H  placed higher value on their childrens magnet program than did sampled parents of children in schools with a magnet program II II II  would be less likely, than sampled magnet-program parents, to continue sending their children to their Stipulation Magnet School if it no longer had its magnet program or had an altered program of diminished quality Discussion. The data showed that a majority of sampled parents believed their children liked school and that the schools were preparing their children for the future. Two-thirds (magnet programs) to three quarters (Stipulation magnets) of the parents thought that their childrens learning needs were being met and III 56  Ml a solid majority in both groups thought their children were receiving a quality education. However, in three other areas, there were noticeable differences in program perceptions and knowledge between the sampled parent groups. A summary of these differences follows. M First, more sampled parents of Stipulation Magnet children could accurately describe their schools magnet focus than those sampled parents of children enrolled in schools with magnet programs. This was true even among the sample whose children were identified as enrolled in an embedded magnet program . Ml H Second, it was noticeably more important to sampled Stipulation Magnet parents that their school had a magnet program than their counterparts with children enrolled in regular schools with a magnet program. Third, only 29% of sampled Stipulation Magnet parents said that they would continue to send their children to their magnet school if it no longer had a magnet program, while a somewhat higher percentage (41%), but less than a majority, of parents with children enrolled in a school with a magnet program would continue enrollment under similar circumstances. Displays one, two and three contain details.  M 1. Magnet Program Description H Parents' Ability to Describe Magnet Program Stipulated Magnet Schools/Schools with Magnet Program 2005 - 2006 100 90 80 70 S, 60 O) w  50 o A\u0026gt; Q. 40 30 20 10 0 78%   ill Accurate Description Inaccurate Description  Stipulated Magnet Schools N=70  Schools w/ Magnet Program N=83 Ml Ml Ml  In the parents  words . ..  Stipulation Magnets Ml  \"They study a lot of cultures and languages.   It focuses on traditional subjects - math, science, reading, etc. and makes sure that the kids excel in these core subjects.  Ml  Regular School with a Magnet Program Ml  Good school and classroom well equipped.   They do a lot of activities.\" 2. Importance of Magnet Program. Ml Ml MlI 57 II IN In interviews and surveys, parents answered a question about whether it was important to them that their childs school had a magnet program. The data indicated that parents whose children were enrolled in a Stipulation Magnet School felt more strongly about the fact that their childs school had a magnet program than did parents with children enrolled in an area schools embedded magnet program. See display below for details. IN Parents' Perceptions of Magnet Schools and Programs ls it important to you that your child's school has a magnet program?\" 2005 - 2006 IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN 100 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 c I a0\u0026gt;) s, nc a u 94% Yes  Stipulated Magnets N=106  Magnet Programs N=97 2% 25% 12% 4% No Don't Know In the parents words . . .  Stipulation Magnet School  high standards  small classes, good teachers  more intense and meaningful programs   the reputation that Magnet Schools have attained  The education that magnet schools offer is outstanding.   I love the structured, disciplined atmosphere, the top-notch teachers, the focus on learning ..  Regular School with a Magnet Program The program offers more challenges.  The program prepares my child for the future.  Magnet schools offer more opportunities for their students.\" It is a good school.  Good cultural mix.  \"If thats what makes it a good school.  3. Enrollment Plans if Magnet Program Altered or Discontinued 58  Parents also provided input into whether they would continue to have their child attend their school if it no longer had a magnet program. Some of the interviewed parents elaborated upon their answers with the interviewer. The following graph and list of parent comments provide details.  Parents' Perceptions of Magnet Schools and Programs \" Would you continue to have your child attend the school if it no longer had a magnet program ? 2005-2006 I 100 90 80  4\u0026gt; E 8 w eVn ocu u 70 60 SO 40 30 29% 41% 31% 34% 20 10 9% 6% 31% Yes \"Only If Same Quality\" No Don't Know  Stipulated Magnet School N=112  Magnet Pro^ams N=101 c 0 I M a aa In the parents words . . .  Stipulation Magnet Schools Bl No ... my assumption is that the high standards will decrease.\" The magnet program is what makes us go to that school.  The school just wouldn t be the same.  Not if its not a good school.  Bl  Schools with a Magnet Program Bl  As long as he was served well.   No, magnet schools are better.   Quality of education would change.   I wouldnt have my child anywhere else.  Bl Bl Summary. The data from the parent surveys and interviews provided insight into parents understanding of the magnet schools and programs and their perceptions of their worth. Much of the data also suggest that a deeper investigation into magnet parents perceptions and concerns would assist the district in any future decisions that might impact the schools and programs. Consequently, the following recommendations are offered for consideration: Recommendations II 59 II II 1. Increase the sample size to include more magnet parents, schools and programs and narrow the inquiry to areas that could generate high impact outcomes. 2. Investigate the alternatives that magnet parents would consider if their magnet schools or programs were altered or eliminated and what impact these considerations could have. II II II Students. In late Spring, 2006, the evaluator field tested a nine question student survey on the perceptions that students had about their magnet programs. A cross section of 220 elementary and high school magnet students from five schools shared their input on whether that they were receiving a quality education, if they were learning what they needed to know, and if they liked their magnet classes and wanted to learn as much as possible in them. II II Students also described their magnet programs and how, if at all, they thought their classes were preparing them for the following year. The purpose of the field test was to establish a survey format and language level that both young children and older students could understand and answer with ease. The data are preliminary and no definitive findings were generated from this field test. A larger investigation of students perceptions will be part of the Year II evaluation design. II The graph below displays an example of students perceptions in three areas. II Student Perceptions Student Percentages Reflecting Partial or Full Agreement Spring, 2006 II \"I am getting a quality education.\" I want to learn as much as possible in my magnet classes.  \"In my ma^iet classes, I am learning what I need to know.\" II II II II II II II II 0) 0) O) ce c a 2 9 100 90 so 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Quality Education Learn as Muchas Possible  Stipulation Magnets N = 111  Errbedded Magnets N = 109 Learning Wiatl\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eDreyfus, Jeanne P.\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_600","title":"'Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District,'' draft","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Brooks, Roy G."],"dc_date":["2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","Students"],"dcterms_title":["'Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District,'' draft"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/600"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["40 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nDr. Roy G. Brooks, superintendent, Little Rock School District\n2005 Portfolio of Data for the Little Rock School District Demographics Student Achievement Perceptions Processes Dr. Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent IFounded: Enrollment: Grade Levels: Vision: yG. L^rintendeni Little Rock School District Portfolio I/)/?.! 7-7'1 [ks 1853 View of downtown Little Rock from across the Arkansas River 25,868 (2004-2005) Pre-K (6 weeks) through 12 To become the highest achieving urban school district in the nation. Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 2 of 2 Background Demographic Data Achieve! [t Dau Pen ftual Table of Contents page 3 6 125 197 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c L c c c c 1 r o o o o Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 3 of 3 Background The City of Little Rock has a population of 184,000 (July 2004 estimate), 40 percent of whom are African-American and three percent or more Hispanic or Latino. This composition contrasts with the general US population, 12.3 per cent of whom are African-American and 12.5 percent Hispanic or Latino\nbut it is more similar to many cities in the southern US. Historically, African-Americans of Arkai and/d natkhave migrated from rural areas and small towns to cities where education (iKerresources were more available to them. This has contributed to Little Ss larger proportion of African-American citizens than many other cities and rowi The median i the US medii a] igh school (hig t^r degrees ci of Little Rock residents is 34.5 years, less than a year younger than ige, and 85.9 percent of those 25 years or older have graduated from J^an the US figure of 80.4 percent). Those with bachelors or ipose 35.5 percent, compared to 24.4 percent of the US, adults.\nr However, the median household income of $37,572 is less than the US median of hearly $42,000. Cil ui is enjoy benefits of the state governments seat here along with a growing university which includes a law school and an expanding university medical Center. The population supports a prosperous symphony orchestra, ballet and opera, several theater groups, an active art museum, and much popular music. Within a half hours drive one can enjoy boating, fishing, hunting, hiking, and other outdoor recreation. Public education in Little Rock began in 1853 under the City Councils governance and the administration of the City Councils Committee on Schools. This Committee hoped that the event was \"... the commencement of a system which will fully meet the wants of the whole community. It The States constitution provides for adequate education for its children, and the General Assembly (state legislature) grants authority to local districts. In 1869, following the war-time suspension of public education, the citizens of Little Rock established a school district and elected a Board of Directors. Frederick Kramer was its first president. J J T) Ti The LRSD enrollment in 1878-79 was 2,142. In the 1890s, the Districts first African-American teacher, Lottie (Charlotte) E. Stephens, a graduate of Oberlin College, taught history and Latin at Union School, where Jefferson G. Ish was principal and later a math teacher. Union was one of three schools for African- American students and their only high school. ILittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 4 of 4 LRSDs flagship, Little Rock (later named Central) High School opened in 1927. In 1957, it was thrust into global spotlight. After Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which stated that the \"separate but equal\" policy was failing to educate equally African-American students, the Little Rock Board of Education planned to integrate its schools. In September 1957, however, hostile opposition, exploited by Governor Orval Faubus, arose against admitting nine African-American students to C c c c Little Ai^ thie A bui itizenXvi Jtock Central High School. President Eisenhower ordered troops of the U.S. Airborne Division to escort the students into the school and federalized Lansas National Guard. During the summer of 1958, the Governor closed the lublic high schools to prevent further desegregation efforts, and Little Rock's :d against the immediate integration of all of the District's schools. The ligh schots(s\\|osed during the 1958-59 school year. City leaders led a recall of the three segreg^ol ^ened school^ iHp^ision of tl District Court. ist School Board members. In the fall of 1959, the School Board mi rus This Supervision continued !! I! P ' i . .W*. 'toI arf To nnger than that of rfner US district, me right is the ,ittle Rock nine, the African-American students who entered Central High School in the fall of 1957, in front of the school at a commemoration of the event. C C T J C u From 1973 until 1987, elementary schools divided into grades 1 to 3 and grades 4 to 6. Some schools began the program for 4-year-olds, Pre-K, in 1989. The new Rockefeller Elementary, built to replace schools demolished by an expressway in central Little Rock, now has programs for infants (6 weeks old) through grade 8. As the result of its suit against Pulaski County Special School District, North Little Rock School District, and Arkansas Department of Education, LRSD annexed 14 schools from the county in 1987. C c c c c In 2000, voters approved a 5-milI tax increase, which raised more than $115 million for much-needed building improvements and expansions and technology upgrades at all schools and district offices and a dedicated building maintenance fund. In Sentember 2002 the U. S. District Court declared the LRSD comnliant, but it c cLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 5 of 5 ordered program evaluations. In 2004, the Court ordered LRSD to hire a team of professional evaluators who would indefinitely evaluate its programs. The Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department is one of the few in the nations districts that investigates its educational data scientifically in addition to publishing test results. In 2005, it begins formative evaluations with district and school portfolios. a a a a Li ^5 Vi h'S cewers. \u0026lt;1 I Dr. Roy G. Brooks (in class in the photo to the left), became superintendent in 2004 and set the goal for LRSD to become the highest achieving urban school district. Today, LRSD operates 34 elementary schools (Pre-K - 5), eight middle schools (6 - 8), five high schools (9 - 12), a career-technical center, an accelerated learning center and two alternative learning It employs approximately 4,000 people to educate its nearly 26,000 IFudents. More than 55% of teachers hold a master's degree or higher, and many have been honored with state and national awards, including the National Education Association Salute to Excellence in Education Award, the Milken Family Foundation National Educator Award and the NASSP/MetLife Arkansas Principal of the Year Award. Students, who are offered more Advanced Placement (AP) and Pre-AP courses than any others in the state, attend the finest colleges and universities in the nation (Columbia, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, and Yale, to name a few). The LRSD regularly has more National Merit Semifmalists than any other school district in the state. A Li Li J J Li J a a a a Sources'. LRSD archives (School Board minutes, annual reports, employee directories, etc.). Hobby, Selma\n1991 research project about the Little Rock School District. \"Constitutional Writes,\" the official newsletter of Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site. Summer 2003\nvol. 1, issue 1. Arkansas Democrat. Monday, May 7, 1979\np. IB. J 'J C Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 6 of 6 ccc c c cc c LC c ccC C c L ccc c. L LL LL C C C 'D Page 7 of 7 Year 2000-01 Number 25,226 Little Rock School District Portfolio 2001-02 J Demographic Data Little Rock School District Student Enrollment by Year 2000-01 through 2004-05 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 J 'J 25,233 25,331 25,278 25,690 School District Student Enrollment 2000-01 through 2005-06 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 8 of 8 c cc Little Rock School District Student Enrollment Percent by Gender 2000-01 through 2004-05 ccc 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 c Male 50.1 50.1 49.9 50.0 50.2 c Female 49.9 49.9 50.1 50.0 49.8 CC 49.9 2000-01 Enrollment by Gender  Male  Female 50.1 49.9 50.1 50.0 49.8 50.1 49.9 50.0 50.2 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 C C C cc ccccccccccc ccccccc c ccc cccc c Little Rock School District Por^'olio Page 9 of 9 lol District Percent Ethnicity  African- American White Hispanic  Other J J 'i Little Rock School District Portfolio 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 - 20.0 - 10.0 0.0 Page 10 of 10 Little Rock School District Student Enrollment by Percent Ethnicity 2000-2001 through 2004-2005 African-American White Hispanic 2000-01 68.2 27.3 2.9 2001-02 68.7 26.8 2002-03 68.9 2003-04 68.7 ter 1.6 3.2 1.7 25.7 25.1 3.6 4.2 2004-05 68.6 24.3 5.0 1.8 2.0 2.0 Enrollment by Percent Ethnicity  African-American  White Hispanic Other C' c c. C\", c\nc\nCT. C. C, C, c: c: c, c\nc\nc, c, Qr .X: Hz HL 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 c c c c c. c, c c. c. or. c: c\nc: c, c: c c C'Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 11 of 11 I Little Rock School District  Student Enrollment of Pre-K through Grade 6 2000-01 through 2004-05 Year Grade 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Pre-K 924 1,208 1,257 949 1,292 K 1,933 1,937 2,026 2,003 2,016 Grade 1 2,027 1,995 1,979 2,082 2,057 Grade 2 1,958 1,965 1,906 1,968 1,995 Grade 3 1,933 1,916 1,954 1,920 1,898 '3  '4 Grade 4 1,991 1,893 1,869 1,972 1,888 ide 5 2,001 1,976 1,849 1,840 1,950 G, 1,935 1,959 1,946 1,837 1,834 I1 I Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 12 of 12 Grade 7 8 9 10 11 12 Little Rock School District Student Enrollment of Grades 7 through 12 2000-01 through 2004-05 Year 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 1,797 1,719 2,014 1,814 1,623 1,557 1,880 2,012 1,979 1,821 1,765 1,813 1,964 1,877 1,994 2,031 2,091 2,321 1,736 1,774 1,781 1,825 1,601 1,528 1,561 1,558 1,408 1,387 1,331 1,358  c ccc c C C. c: c: c\ncc C. c: 2400 2200  2000  1800 a 1600  1400 1200 1000 - 3 z 800 600 400 200 0 c: c. c\nc. Little Rock School District Student Enrollment of Grade 7 through Grade 12 2000-01 through 2004-05 1 8  2001-02 9 Ruin 10 II 12  2000-01  2002-03  2003-04  200 c\nc c: c: cc c: c: cc c cccc c: c: C' C' c: c: c: c: c. Little Rock School District Por^blio Page 13 of 13 Little Rock School District Enrollment of Cohorts Starting in Grades K through 3 School Years 2001-01 through 2004-05 Advancing grades K through 3 1 through 4 2 through 5 3 through 6 4 through 7 Starting gradcs/years 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 K (Cohort A) 1 (Cohort B) 1,933 2,027 1,958 1,933 1,995 1,965 1,916 1,893 1,906 1,954 1,869 1,849 1,920 1,972 1,840 1,837 1,888 1,950 1,834 1,797 'J 2200  2000 ' 1800 ' IfiOO - 1400  1200 1000 800  600  400  200 - 0 ' Little Rock School District Student Cohorts A to D 2000-01 to 2005-06 ls5' i2 i is i *SSS\u0026gt; SSo, S-, Illi S Cohort A (K)  2(100-01 Cohort B (Grade 1) 2001-02  2002-03 Cohort C (Grade 2) Cohort D (Grade 3)  2(IO3-(\u0026gt;4 12(X\u0026gt;44)5  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 14 of 14 - Little Rock School District Enrollment of Cohorts Starting in Grades 4 through 8 School Years 2001-01 through 2004-05 Advancing grades Starting grades/years K (Cohort E) 1 (Cohort F) (Cohort G) 3 (Cdhort H) C' cc C' C CC K through 3 1 through 4 2 through 5 3 through 6 4 through 7 c\n2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 c 1,991 2,001 1,935 1,797 1,976 1,959 1,880 1,765 1,946 2,012 1,813 2,031 1,979 1,964 2,091 1,781 1,877 2,321 1,825 1,558 cc c: c C' c\nC Little Rock School District Student Cohorts E to H 2000*01 to 2005-06 C' c. 1800 - 1600 -! 1200 I I 3 1000  z 800 600 - 400 - I ' 2000 -I 200 -  0 4 Illi Q c: cc c: c: c: c: c: c: Cohon E (Cirsde 4) Cotx^rt F (Grade 5)  2(X)14)2  2(X)2-O3 Cohort G (Grade 6)  2\u0026lt;NI34)4 Cohon H (Grade 7)  2(X)44)S  c c: c c: c. c. c: c\nc\nc: c: 1 J Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 15 of 15 3 1 1 \"J 1 J i 1 '1 'I Little Rock School District Teachers 2000-01 through 2004-2005 e CuC Ho i\u0026gt; I Z 1,800 1,700 1,600 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 i - 2000-01 2004-05 81% 19% 2000-01 Little Rock School District Gender of Teachers by Percent 2000-01 through 2004-05  Male  Female 81% 82% 81% 81% 19% 18% 19% 19% 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 16 of 16 Bale Little Rock School District Teacher Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) by School 1999-00 through 2004-05 School 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-2004 2004-05 Elementary 18.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.5 Baseline 18.0 16.0 15.0 16.0 16.5 Booker arver (^cot lale DodX\\ Fair Pari Forest Park Franklin Fulbright 27.0 18.0 24.0 27.0 19.0 13.0 13.0 14.5 27.0 21.0 28.0 16.0 24.0 26.0 20.0 12.0 11.0 14.0 22.0 21.0 29.0 17.0 24.4 27.0 20.0 12.0 12.0 15.0 20.0 22.0 29.0 17.0 24.0 27.0 19.0 13.0 11.0 16.0 21.0 23.0 30.0 18.5 26.0 31.0 17.8 17.5 10.5 19.7 22.0 28.5 c c Ccc C, c\nc c. c c. c: c\nc c: c\nc. cc Geyer Springs Jefferson Xing Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek 15.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.5 IS 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 20.0 29.0 18.0 18.0 14.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 28.0 16.0 18.0 14.0 15.0 18.0 20.0 28.0 15.0 18.0 15.0 14.0 19.0 19.0 22.5 c 27.0 28.2 c 14.0 17.0 c 17.0 15.0 13.0 20.5 16.0 10.5 c c c Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine 14.0 14.0 24.0 18.0 14.0 14.0 22.0 20.0 13.0 14.4 21.0 13.0 14.0 24.2 Stephens Terry Wakefield 18.0 24.0 16.0 26.0 Washington Watson 30.0 21.0 Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff Middle School Dunbar Forest Heights Pulaski Heights Southwest Henderson 13.0 21.0 16.5 15.0 52.4 53.0 51.6 48.0 51.0 22.0 18.0 25.0 21.0 13.0 21.0 15.0 14.0 53.9 54.0 50.6 47.5 53.3 22.0 20.0 26.0 23.0 16.0 27.0 21.0 13.0 21.0 15.0 14.0 52.2 55.0 48.6 47.0 53.0 20.0 16.0 26.0 23.0 17.0 27.0 22.0 13.0 21.0 16.0 13.0 51.2 53.0 49.0 47.5 54.0 14.5 13.8 24.0 19.0 26.0 27.5 20.5 30.5 24.0 14.0 23.0 16.5 13.5 51.2 53.0 47.4 47.0 53.1 cc ccC c\nLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 17 of 17 3 1 Little Rock School District Teacher Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) hy School 1999-00 through 2004-05 School \"I -3 'J 'i '1 J Cloverdale Mabelvale Mann High School Central Fair Park cClellan 2000-01 54.0 40.8 58.2 117.5 67.2 89.1 81.6 76.9 0.5 16.5 2001-02 54.0 46.8 59.4 2002-03 51.0 47.2 56.3 2003-2004 54.0 49.3 2004-05 51.1 48.8 59.7 59.6 121.0 64.0 114.5 64.2 93.1 81.3 77.6 17.0 17.5 86.6 71.8 71.6 16.0 14.0 12.5 123.4 70.5 89.6 75.8 73.7 19.0 13.0 135.4 77.5 87.6 70.5 75.4 14.5 20.0 15.0 13.5 '2Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 18 of 18 School Elementary Badgett Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total 1 2 3 4 5 K 42 36 23 20 n 21 21 33 31 27 22 19 63 69 54 47 49 40 c c C' ccc c\nC c: c: c. c: c: c: c: Bale Baseline P Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K p Total 17 0 17 c. Booker 1 2 3 4 5 K Total 186 153 339 c 63 42 51 51 42 249 c. 52 45 49 46 0 45 36 336 52 48 44 38 42 0 53 34 311 89 99 106 90 95 65 544 50 44 35 54 14 55 33 327 47 40 39 38 38 6 39 35 282 77 92 113 113 87 88 570 36 48 40 39 14 58 35 321 45 46 45 41 45 5 40 32 299 93 88 108 116 113 94 612 53 35 43 45 0 62 35 324 47 48 45 41 40 0 41 36 298 103 99 86 116 118 83 605 51 48 34 47 0 60 37 319 44 42 45 38 42 0 41 39 291 95 107 104 94 112 92 604 242 220 201 231 28 280 176 1,627 235 224 218 196 207 11 214 176 1,481 457 485 517 529 525 422 2,935 Brady 1 49 67 53 35 47 251 c: c c cc c: cc c c. c C c C c c\nz: z: I 1 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 19 of 19 Little Rock School District \"J Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 School Grade 2 2000-01 54 2001-02 46 2002-03 60 2003-04 58 2004-05 35 'J J Carver Chicot 1 Cloverdale 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 50 54 56 0 64 18 345 80 91 82 88 93 73 507 76 76 87 71 78 0 84 34 506 70 36 44 55 7 59 18 332 78 85 85 84 89 72 493 83 76 72 73 75 19 73 35 506 74 40 35 44 7 55 18 312 83 78 89 87 80 75 492 70 75 74 67 75 18 79 36 494 61 64 52 51 0 59 18 337 87 89 85 89 79 73 502 76 74 73 75 68 0 81 36 483 65 50 40 45 0 64 38 319 82 80 91 84 87 73 497 76 86 79 71 86 0 79 59 536 74 Total 253 240 225 251 14 301 110 1,645 410 423 432 432 428 366 2,491 381 387 385 357 382 37 396 200 2,525 344 1 1 J 'J 1 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total Dodd 1 2 51 49 64 72 58 35 399 32 32 73 57 50 70 65 36 425 30 34 72 56 52 55 80 35 411 29 34 59 55 ,49 42 n 34 381 35 34 58 42 44 43 59 40 360 34 39 313 259 259 282 339 180 1,976 160 173 Brady 3 4 5 30 26 38 26 23 21 35 18 16 30 39 18 36 41 37 157 147 130 Little Rock School District Portfolio School Fair Park Page 20 of 20 Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade EE K P Total 1 2 3 4 2000-01 0 42 18 218 45 33 29 25 2001-02 8 29 17 188 39 35 24 21 2002-03 10 40 18 200 32 37 38 19 2003-04 0 32 18 206 30 25 27 30 2004-05 0 37 37 261 29 25 15 19 Total 18 180 108 1,073 175 155 133 114 Z'.- c\nc\nc c\nC c C Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Fulbright 5 K p Total 1 2 3 4 5 K p Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K p 1 2 3 4 5 EE K p 16 40 36 224 47 52 42 48 57 40 18 304 71 58 68 71 80 0 61 54 463 67 62 72 68 74 0 72 18 22 37 30 208 47 50 48 47 41 53 18 304 63 47 38 58 61 10 60 50 387 71 71 71 13 78 7 11 18 28 40 35 229 68 43 44 48 50 59 17 329 52 59 46 43 47 13 60 54 374 89 67 12 76 69 6 11 18 23 36 35 206 68 65 45 41 51 57 18 345 66 57 56 48 40 0 63 54 384 84 101 71 1^ 74 0 80 18 26 34 38 186 69 58 55 43 35 60 40 360 67 59 54 46 48 0 55 57 386 88 80 94 IZ 83 0 91 40 115 187 174 1,053 299 268 234 227 234 269 111 1,642 319 280 262 266 276 23 299 269 1,994 399 381 380 3i\u0026gt;9 378 13 391 112 Q. c Ccc c c c ccc ccc cC c\nQ. c. C c: C c\nc: C-C c Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 21 of 21 1 Little Rock School District i Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 School Grade Total 2000-01 433 2001-02 466 2002-03 474 2003-04 502 2004-05 554 Total 2,429 Geyer Springs 1 2 46 48 50 49 38 50 47 41 47 41 228 229 'J J Gibbs 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K Total Jefferson 1 2 3 4 5 EE K 50 50 55 53 34 336 60 44 45 46 46 58 299 76 59 72 58 63 0 59 50 52 48 38 33 320 69 60 45 45 46 39 304 63 72 66 76 51 7 56 47 51 48 40 34 308 45 64 65 47 47 40 308 53 63 69 68 n 7 60 48 53 51 40 34 314 46 45 68 67 48 40 314 63 67 67 69 59 0 60 41 44 47 39 38 297 45 44 45 65 71 41 311 60 60 73 68 66 0 62 236 250 249 210 173 1,575 265 257 268 270 258 218 1,536 315 321 347 339 316 14 297 'J a J P Total 17 404 18 409 18 415 18 403 40 429 111 2,060 King King Mabelvale 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 .. 85 98 91 93 72 85 71 595 50 51 53 66 81 87 86 76 87 82 70 569 35 42 34 37 76 80 83 88 62 96 68 553 38 35 38 35 87 79 . 84 88 86 86 71 581 40 40 37 40 98 90 75 84 87 90 80 604 35 39 33 36 427 434 419 429 394 439 360 2,902 198 207 195 214Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 22 of 22 School McDermott Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 2000-01 59 0 47 18 344 60 67 53 2001-02 55 12 37 18 270 62 63 62 2002-03 41 10 39 18 254 59 62 65 2003-04 35 0 38 18 248 64 64 63 2004-05 40 0 38 36 257 63 65 63 Total 230 22 199 108 1,373 308 321 306 c: c\nc\nc: c\nc\nc: c c: cc cc c Meadowcliff Mitchell 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K 63 49 55 18 365 36 33 36 50 46 51 9 261 42 37 47 47 47 0 37 51 58 54 68 294 66 44 50 51 260 c 50 57 55 56 273 C 18 18 18 40 112 c 372 49 42 39 43 49 40 17 279 42 47 47 46 44 14 39 363 47 50 46 ^7 43 60 28 321 46 42 41 43 48 7 39 368 44 49 50 49 40 60 35 327 41 34 39 44 39 0 40 406 51 44 45 56 53 60 40 349 23 24 20 23 29 0 17 1,874 227 218 216 245 231 271 129 1,537 194 184 194 203 207 21 172 Mitchell P Total 18 275 18 297 18 284 otter Creek 1 2 3 4 5 K P 18 255 19 155 91 1,266 75 70 47 52 50 55 18 69 66 68 54 50 72 17 74 65 69 66 55 80 18 89 60 75 68 64 78 18 81 90 67 71 81 80 39 388 351 326 311 300 365 110 CCc c c c cCCC c c\nc C c C I Little Rock School District Porifolio Page 23 of 23 School \"1 \"a J J 'A '2 'J '31 '2 1 Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Romine Stephens Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 2000-01 367 48 48 42 63 51 58 0 310 41 42 35 40 33 36 34 261 49 57 51 49 54 62 88 410 53 41 48 38 30 0 59 35 304 48 40 46 2001-02 396 44 42 50 40 61 44 0 281 40 35 42 37 39 38 36 267 46 49 49 47 49 55 92 387 53 43 36 40 36 1 41 32 282 74 88 71 2002-03 427 45 41 44 52 42 39 18 281 43 44 41 46 47 40 36 297 64 49 57 45 58 58 95 426 36 42 37 30 37 17 52 36 287 100 74 92 2003-04 452 39 42 48 46 54 38 18 285 47 43 33 46 47 40 35 291 56 51 43 44 44 56 98 392 41 39 ,40 41 28 0 51 36 276 87 97 76 2004-05 509 46 38 44 48 50 40 20 286 41 38 31 35 38 39 40 262 66 71 56 51 51 55 103 453 47 47 35 48 47 0 60 37 321 74 69 85 Total 2,151 222 211 228 249 258 219 56 1,443 212 202 182 204 204 193 181 1,378 281 277 256 236 256 286 476 2,068 230 212 196 197 178 18 263 176 1,470 383 368 370Little Rock School District Portfolio School Page 24 of 24 Terry Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 2000-01 53 48 0 56 35 326 85 68 2001-02 74 73 9 99 52 540 74 83 2002-03 69 84 12 79 54 564 99 72 2003-04 84 65 0 83 54 546 100 86 2004-05 64 69 0 80 58 499 104 97 Total 344 339 21 397 253 2,475 462 406 cc c\nc\ncc c C, c. c. c. c. Wakefield Washington Washington Watson 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K 81 76 87 77. 18 487 58 58 48 53 54 52 17 340 63 77 69 69 84 0 71 53 486 71 82 61 72 54 74 68 82 79 99 18 503 70 59 65 56 56 58 17 381 75 52 61 63 63 13 77 51 455 72 63 81 54 72 77 7^ 65 87 380 71 78 96 18 513 40 55 41 50 50 68 0 304 67 68 53 70 64 16 69 54 461 85 68 73 82 56 79 77 71 97 18 514 78 41 69 55 41 58 0 342 75 61 73 54 71 0 80 51 465 87 73 69 76 77 78 7A 80 96 39 577 71 73 50 79 56 80 40 449 95 79 73 84 71 0 80 80 562 75 7A 61 62 63 80 380 395 460 111 2,594 317 286 273 293 257 316 74 1,816 375 337 329 340 353 29 377 289 2,429 390 360 345 346 322 388 c. c c. ccc cc c cc C c\nc\nc: c: c:  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 25 of 25 School Western Hills 'J -1 Williams Wilson Wilson Woodruff Middle Cloverdale Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K Total 1 2 3 4 5 EE K P Total 1 2 3 4 5 K P Total 6 7 2000-01 36 450 33 46 41 45 44 37 18 264 68 67 84 89 88 58 454 58 43 39 46 43 0 43 16 288 39 38 41 34 35 37 53 277 293 237 2001-02 32 451 42 44 46 37 49 39 18 275 61 67 80 87 91 60 446 42 45 40 34 28 15 31 17 252 43 35 32 42 38 40 35 265 288 2002-03 36 479 49 41 48 50 34 39 18 279 64 63 88 90 95 60 460 37 48 43 35 36 22 40 17 278 48 35 40 34 42 39 35 273 273 282 2003-04 36 496 49 46 43 46 54 40 18 296 68 69 83 88 92 59 459 50 39 39 52 42 0 42 18 282 37 ,40 36 34 33 40 35 255 259 262 2004-05 40 455 42 40 37 47 36 40 20 262 68 68 89 88 89 59 461 41 51 38 33 59 0 43 19 284 37 33 37 28 25 36 39 235 233 241 Total 180 2,331 215 217 215 225 217 195 92 1,376 329 334 424 442 455 296 2,280 228 226 199 200 208 37 199 87 1,384 204 181 186 172 173 192 197 1,305 1,346 1,299 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 26 of 26 School Dunbar Forest Heights Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 8 SM Total 6 7 8 Total 6 2000-01 219 0 749 278 226 239 743 274 2001-02 242 1 808 256 254 226 736 258 2002-03 252 2 809 265 240 221 726 258 2003-04 269 0 790 257 262 234 753 264 2004-05 208 0 682 255 242 249 746 222 Total 1,190 3 3,838 1,311 1,224 1,169 3,704 1,276 c c C C c C' cccc C cc c Henderson Mabelvale Mabelvale 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 248 235 0 757 198 184 178 0 560 196 173 145 0 514 Mann 6 7 8 Total 290 272 279 841 256 247 26 787 219 215 193 42 669 205 185 158 14 562 286 276 266 828 268 257 19 802 218 221 207 30 676 219 234 193 17 663 292 289 269 850 248 268 0 780 186 231 246 0 663 195 240 215 0 650 294 285 289 868 230 235 0 687 235 183 211 0 629 209 191 232 0 632 293 294 286 873 Pulaski Heights 6 7 8 SM Total 224 267 249 0 740 Southwest 6 7 8 SM Total 181 182 163 0 526 225 225 241 9 700 213 170 161 15 559 210 250 226 8 694 207 205 173 23 608 222 225 246 257 0 725 159 191 168 0 518 244 239 0 708 149 165 178 0 492 1,250 1,242 45 3,813 1,056 1,034 1,035 72 3,197 1,024 1,023 943 31 3,021 1,455 1,416 1,389 4,260 1,106 1,232 1,212 17 3,567 909 913 843 38 2,703 CccC c: c: c c: c: c\nc: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c: c\nC' c c: c: c: C  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 27 of 27 School High Central 'J Hall Metro Parkview Parkview Fair McClellan Garland Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 9 10 11 12 ss Total 9 10 11 12 SS Total 9 10 12 Total 9 10 11 12 Total 9 10 11 12 SS Total 9 10 11 12 SS Total 6 7 8 2000-01 1 2001-02 1 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total 593 531 426 509 0 2,059 437 412 319 277 0 1,445 299 293 287 274 1,153 275 212 223 185 0 895 361 294 280 205 0 1,140 1 8 12 626 479 426 401 0 1,932 414 380 340 258 18 1,410 300 282 284 270 1,136 282 246 223 166 24 941 314 289 254 200 16 1,073 9 22 31 656 547 409 387 1 2,000 394 346 319 277 19 1,355 3 4 1 8 300 284 277 269 1,130 310 255 220 164 25 974 324 295 230 194 14 1,057 4 23 15 678 574 504 348 0 2,104 391 364 292 271 0 1,318 0 0 1 1 294 290 284 258 1,126 367 271 213 172 0 1,023 326 248 230 196 0 1,000 1 14 18 743 560 482 413 0 2,198 524 354 333 248 0 1,459 301 280 274 253 1,108 362 305 220 171 0 1,058 297 271 183 174 0 925 13 31 39 3,296 2,691 2,247 2,058 1 10,293 2,160 1,856 1,603 1,331 37 6,987 3 4 2 9 1,494 1,429 1,406 1,324 5,653 1,596 1,289 1,099 858 49 4,891 1,622 1,397 1,177 969 30 5,195 28 98 115 I i Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 28 of 28 School LRSD-R ACC Little Rock School District Enrollment by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Grade 9 10 11 12 SM Total 3 4 5 Total 9 10 11 12 Total 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Total 20 13 6 3 0 63 26 27 35 88 29 59 82 104 274 30 16 8 4 2 122 14 34 33 81 28 44 66 109 247 34 21 6 0 0 103 10 22 67 95 194 32 18 8 3 0 94 3 16 30 82 131 93 45 31 9 0 261 1 10 35 90 136 209 113 59 19 2 643 40 61 68 169 71 151 280 480 982 c ccccc c c C Ccccc c c c\nc c: c: c: c c: c: c: c c. c\nQ~. 1 c\nc: I.. Middle High Districl Elementary Little Rock School District Portfolio Little Rock School District Percentage of Students Qualifying for Free/Reduced Lunch _______________ 2000-01 through 2004-05_______________ Level / Year 2000-01 62% 2001-02 65% 2002-03 66% 2003-04 66% Page 29 of 29 2004-05 67% 54% 57% 60% 58% 63% 27% 51% 33% 54% 34% 56% Free/Reduced Lunch Students 35% 56% 40% 59% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Elementary Middle High District 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 30 of 30 Little Rock School District Student Mobility Number and Percent by School 2000-01 through 2004-05 School Elementary Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park\nJ ForestPgH Fra^iWlrr^ 'Qelier Sprii^ Gi^\\_ Jeffelnon^ King \\ \\ Mabelvale^\\ 2000-01 Number 41 53 20 54 \\39 'WadifcKcliff J ^itch^ffx Otter Cri^ft: Pulaski Hts .. itsell .wkefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff 55\\ 43 41 , 14 20 37 Z59 50 62 36 35 42 22 19 86 72 51 56 72 33 20 48 36 Percent 12.2% 17.0% 3.7% 15.7% 2.4% 19.6% 13.5% 17.9% 20.5% 6.9% \\l .9% \\9V/o 4^/o 5.0% 6.2% 12.2% 16.2% 19.2% 22.5% 9.8% 11.3% 16.1% 5.4% 6.3% 26.4% 14.8% 15.0% 11.5% 16.0% 12.5% 4.4% 16.7% 13.0% 2001-02 Number 34 55 35 59 17 47 73 26 56 19 65 39 26 9 24 33 59 68 33 52 40 34 57 21 19 60 67 44 30 76 44 14 65 34 Percent 10.4% 19.5% 6.1% 17.8% 3.4% 9.3% 17.2% 13.8% 26.9% 6.3% 16.8% 8.4% 8.1% 3.0% 5.9% 5.8% 21.9% 18.3% 11.8% 17.5% 10.1% 12.1% 21.3% 5.4% 6.7% 11.1% 13.3% 11.5% 6.6% 16.9% 16.0% 3.1% 25.8% 12.8% 2002-03 Number 49 57 18 78 14 60 70 35 40 15 43 35 36 3 28 32 36 54 50 35 47 38 37 34 20 57 44 65 21 41 34 9 50 33 Percent 15.3% 19.1% 2.9% 25.0% 2.8% 12.1% 17.0% 17.5% 17.5% 4.6% 11.5% 7.4% 11.7% 1.0% 6.7% 5.8% 14.2% 14.9% 15.6% 12.3% 11.0% 13.5% 12.5% 8.0% 7.0% 10.1% 8.6% 21.4% 4.6% 8.6% 12.2% 2.0% 18.0% 12.1% 2003-04 Number 39 51 29 62 16 70 86 45 31 19 60 32 49 3 18 28 24 49 55 16 58 29 37 40 31 75 65 48 25 76 30 6 45 15 Percent 12.0% 17.1% 4.8% 18.4% 3.2% 14.5% 22.6% 21.8% 15.0% 5.5% 15.6% 6.4% 15.6% 1.0% 4.5% 4.8% 9.7% 13.3% 16.8% 6.3% 12.8% 10.2% 12.7% 10.2% 11.2% 13.7% 12.6% 14.0% 5.4% 15.3% 10.1% 1.3% 16.0% 5.9% 2004-05 Number 46 51 39 75 42 82 57 44 31 18 70 41 44 3 23 40 70 55 34 12 46 35 36 61 58 76 81 61 64 55 30 10 38 28 Percent 14.4% 17.5% 6.5% 23.5% 8.5% 15.3% 15.8% 16.9% 16.7% 5.0% 18.1% 7.4% 14.8% 1.0% 5.4% 6.6% 27.2% 13.5% 9.7% 7.7% 9.0% 12.2% 13.7% 13.5% 18.1% 15.2% 14.0% 13.6% 11.4% 12.1% 11.5% 2.2% 13.4% 11.9% Middle Schools Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Hts Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Hts Southwest High Schools 97 30 99 73 66 14 45 62 13.0% 4.0% 13.1% 13.0% 12.8% 1.7% 6.1% 11.8% 96 25 111 110 93 10 60 95 11.9% 3.4% 14.1% 16.4% 16.5% 1.2% 8.6% 17.0% 103 34 105 101 47 15 84 74 12.7% 4.7% 13.1% 14.9% 7.1% 1.8% 12.1% 12.2% 90 23 73 85 80 14 65 101 11.4% 3.1% 9.4% 12.8% 12.3% 1.6% 9.0% 19.5% 89 37 82 81 82 10 65 92 13.0% 5.0% 11.9% 12.9% 13.0% 1.1% 9.2% 18.7% c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c: c c c: c: c: c\nc: c: c: c: c O'. c: c: c: (T. c\nc: c:Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 31 of 31 Little Rock School District Student Mobility Number and Percent by School 2000-01 through 2004-05 School ACC Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview All Schools I Total 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 201 82 112 140 106 8 73.4% 4.0% 12.5% 9.7% 9.3% 0.7% 112 118 106 174 114 24 45.3% 6.1% 11.3% 12.3% 10.6% 2.1% 85 113 85 188 103 11 43.8% 5.7% 8.7% 13.9% 9.7% 1.0% 141 104 95 171 95 11 107.6% 4.9% 9.3%  13.0% 9.5% 1.0% 89 133 115 158 103 34 65.4% 6.1% 10.9% 10.8% 11.1% 3.1% I I 11.4% I 2,906 I 11.5% I 2,690 | 10,6% | 2,836 | 11.2% | 3,068 | 11.9% | Little Rock School District A^rage Attendance by Year 2000-01 through 2004-05\ncnt present Average Attendance 100% 90% 0%  80% 70% 60% 50%  40% - 30% - 20% 10% 88% 2000-01 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 88% 89% 93% 90% 92% I i I t Little Rock School District Student Attendance by Year 2000-01 to 2004-05 89% 93% 90% 92% III 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Little Rock School District Por^'olio Page 32 of 32 Little Rock School District Average Student Days Present by Grade Level 2000-01 to 2004-05 Grade K 1 2 3 4 8 All School Elementary Booker  Bale Brady Badgett McDermott Carver Baseline Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Gibbs Chicot Western Hills Jefferson Cloverdale Dodd Meadowcliff Mitchell King c c c c 2000- 01 Days Present 2000- 01 Percent Rate 2001- 02 Days Present 2001- 02 Percent Rate 2002- 03 Days Present 2002- 03 Percent Rate 2003- 04 Days Present 2003- 04 Percent Rate 2004- 05 Days Present 2004- 05 Percent Rate c c c 156.05 157.78 158.98 159.53 159.42 160.47 159.30 158.49 159.48 151.72 151.65 153.13 153.60 156.91 87.7% 88.6% 89.3% ^9.6% 89.6% 90.2% \\g9.5% \\^% 85.' 85.2/s// 86.0% 86.3% 88.2% 157.85 157.78 159.55 158.80 159.24 159.48 162.47 161.12 160.87 152.89 152.90 151.60 152.60 157.65 88.7% 88.6% 89.6% 89.2% 89.5% 89.6% 91.3% 90.5% 90.4% 85.9% 85.9% 85.2% 85.7% 88.6% 165.38 166.06 166.57 166.5 166.45 167.14 166.72 166.13 165.75 160.36 160.94 161.67 160.32 164.77 92.9% 93.3% 93.6% 93.5% 93.5% 93.9% 93.7% 93.3% 93.1% 90.1% 90.4% 90.8% 90.1% 92.6% . 160.45 160.51 160.92 160.69 161.66 162.78 162.1 160.88 162.16 154.16 154.88 153.73 153.8 159.33 90.1% 90.2% 90.4% 90.3% 90.8% 91.4% 91.1% 90.4% 91.1% 86.6% 87.0% 86.4% 86.4% 89.5% 162.47 162.51 163.18 164.8 164.61 164.48 165.51 165.54 165.62 163.04 163.25 164.95 164.5 163.9 91.3% 91.3% 91.7% 92.6% 92.5% 92.4% 93.0% 93.0% 93.0% 91.6% 91.7% 92.7% 92.4% 92.1% C c C c c c c c c c c c Little Rock School District Average Student Attendance Rates by School 2000-01 to 2005-06 2000-01 2000-01 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 c c c Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate C c 161.18 158.02 157.48 143.20 158.39 160.19 157.37 149.60 159.99 160.10 163.98 157.42 159.09 160.38 155.77 158.28 157.84 156.45 161.83 93.2% 91.3% 91.0% 82.8% 91.6% 92.6% 91.0% 86.5% 92.5% 92.5% 94.8% 91.0% 92.0% 92.7% 90.0% 91.5% 91.2% 90.4% 93.5% 161.50 159.57 155.62 149.42 156.83 159.19 154.76 150.67 164.19 159.01 163.34 156.92 161.93 160.86 154.43 156.58 161.51 158.87 164.68 93.4% 92.2% 90.0% 86.4% 90.7% 92.0% 89.5% 87.1% 94.9% 91.9% 94.4% 90.7% 93.6% 93.0% 89.3% 90.5% 93.4% 91.8% 95.2% 165.94 164.57 164.34 0 166.86 167.34 164.61 162.90 168.20 166.86 168.68 165.68 167.70 166.46 165.59 166.99 165.35 166.97 169.06 95.9% 95.1% 95.0% 0.0% 96.5% 96.7% 95.2% 94.2% 97.2% 96.5% 97.5% 95.8% 96.9% 96.2% 95.7% 96.5% 95.6% 96.5% 171.24 163.31 154.12 0 158.92 163.59 155.85 154.03 166.08 99.0% 94.4% 89.1% 0.0% 91.9% 94.6% 90.1% 89.0% 96.0% 97.7% 159.40 165.95 159.66 161.55 162.63 153.20 159.67 160.12 159.09 165.67 92.1% 95.9% 92.3% 93.4% 94.0% 88.6% 92.3% 92.6% 92.0% 95.8% 169.53 163.74 157.19 0 157.76 163.71 159.83 152.33 168.20 157.78 167.35 164.50 165.00 165.84 163.17 159.66 165.45 158.95 170.62 98.0% 94.6% 90.9% 0.0% 91.2% 94.6% 92.4% 88.1% 97.2% 91.2% 96.7% 95.1% 95.4% 95.9% 94.3% 92.3% 95.6% 91.9% 98.6% c c C c c c c c c c c c c c ILittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 33 of 33 Little Rock School District Average Student Attendance Rates by School 2000-01 to 2005-06 2000-01 2000-01 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 School Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate LJ Rockefeller 165.06 Geyer Springs Pulaski Hts Rightsell Romine Stephens Washington Williams Wilson Woodruff Mabelvale 158.63 160.18 158.48 156.97 157.85 159.06 164.16 155.19 155.24 154.80 4 Terry Fulbright Otter Creek Wakefield Watson LRSD-R Total 157.48 159.80 159.36 153.64 156.33 150.07 158.43 7^ 95.4% 91.7% 92.6% 91.6% 90.7% 91.2% 91.9% 94.9% 89.7% \\89.7% ' ^5% 92 92 88.8% 90.4% 86.7% 91.6% 165.78 159.74 161.12 155.11 161.79 154.19 159.25 163.85 155.17 157.12 157.16 155.59 159.21 159.26 154.97 155.82 146.72 158.66 95.8% 92.3% 93.1% 89.7% 93.5% 89.1% 92.1% 94.7% 89.7% 90.8% 90.8% 89.9% 92.0% 92.1% 89.6% 90.1% 84.8% 91.7% 166.17 166.09 166.45 165.61 164.57 164.62 165.95 167.82 165.82 165.45 165.67 166.66 167.10 166.38 164.82 165.59 0 166.23 96.1% 96.0% 96.2% 95.7% 95.1% 95.2% 95.9% 97.0% 95.8% 95.6% 95.8% 96.3% 96.6% 96.2% 95.3% 95.7% 0.0% 96.1% 160.40 158.79 165.30 158.63 158.95 159.30 163.16 165.34 158.38 160.03 160.62 161.88 164.00 158.77 152.43 157.08 0 160.99 92.7% 91.8% 95.5% 91.7% 91.9% 92.1% 94.3% 95.6% 91.5% 92.5% 92.8% 93.6% 94.8% 91.8% 88.1% 90.8% 0.0% 93.1% 164.93 160.12 166.20 164.94 164.16 156.39 162.86 168.70 166.01 156.97 159.65 161.33 165.91 165.06 160.50 158.23 0 163.26 95.3% 92.6% 96.1% 95.3% 94.9% 90.4% 94.1% 97.5% 96.0% 90.7% 92.3% 93.3% 95.9% 95.4% 92.8% 91.5% 0.0% 94.4% iddle lOl Mann 161.88 93.6% 164.26 94.9% 167.89 97.0% 164.6 95.1% 165.57 95.7% Dunbar 164.57 95.1% 165.24 95.5% 167.87 97.0% 165.54 95.7% 169.28 97.8% Forest Heights 160.91 93.0% 162.87 94.1% 165.75 95.8% 161.13 93.1% 168.36 97.3% Pulaski Hts 158.72 91.7% 159.20 92.0% 165.78 95.8% 160.08 92.5% 162.41 93.9% Southwest 152.95 88.4% 156.64 90.5% 162.17 93.7% 156.30 90.3% 159.21 92.0% Henderson 158.60 91.7% 160.14 92.6% 165.45 95.6% 162.83 94.1% 167.02 96.5% Cloverdale 155.93 90.1% 163.28 94.4% 168.09 97.2% 160.23 92.6% 168.01 97.1% Mabelvale 157.24 90.9% 159.51 92.2% 166.62 96.3% 163.15 94.3% 167.24 96.7% Garland 108.33 62.6% 118.87 68.7% 129.33 74.8% 114.27 66.1% 111.17 64.3% Total High Schools Central Hall 158.64 154.70 147.55 Metro Parkview Fair McClellan ACC All Schools Total ____0 163.52 156.34 156.42 93.65 152.76 91.7% 89.4% 85.3% 0.0% 94.5% 90.4% 90.4% 54.1% 88.3% 160.81 93.0% 165.70 95.8% 161.20 93.2% 163.60 94.6% 154.85 148.66 ____0 163.55 154.80 158.80 83.74 89.5% 85.9% 0.0% 94.5% 89.5% 91.8% 48.4% 162.90 157.26 52.71 167.95 162.27 164.12 114.19 94.2% 90.9% 30.5% 97.1% 93.8% 94.9% 66.0% 156.48 148.05 46.00 164.94 157.68 155.42 69.36 90.5% 85.6% 26.6% 95.3% 91.1% 89.8% 40.1% 168.29 160.59 0 172.41 168.81 162.14 107.46 97.3% 92.8% 0.0% 99.7% 97.6% 93.7% 62.1% 153.04 88.5% 161.19 93.2% 154.55 89.3% 165.37 95.6%Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 34 of 34 c c School  Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 Ethnicity 2000-01 2000-01 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 Elementary Booker Bale Brady Badgett McDermott Carver Baseline Fair Park Forest Park Forest Park A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Total A-A White Hispanic Other A-A A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic c c c Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate c c 163.96 158.32 155.75 143.63 161.18 158.74 160.95 147.14 105.00 158.02 159.75 150.26 155.14 148.11 157.48 145.31 120.92 47.00 143.20 158.20 158.45 160.05 157.69 158.39 161.53 160.03 109.00 159.03 160.19 159.17 155.79 128.36 157.37 150.70 145.89 159.50 149.60 162.54 158.63 157.50 92.1% 164.34 88.9% 87.5% 80.7% 90.6% 89.2% 90.4% 82.7% 59.0% ,88.8% 89.7% 84.4% 87.2% 83.2% 88.5% 81.6% 157.78 157.77 166.18 161.50 159.66 161.04 154.00 158.25 159.57 157.08 148.22 160.00 163.00 155.62 148.97 67.9% 26.4% 80.4% 88.9% 89.0% 89.9% 88.6% 89.0% 90.7% 89.9% 61.2% 89.3% 90.0% 89.4% 87.5% 72.1% 0.0% 88.4% 84.7% 82.0% 0.0% 89.6% 84.0% 91.3% 89.1% 88.5% 156.20 165.50 149.42 158.91 156.45 144.52 154.69 156.83 162.27 155.33 148.50 164.05 159.19 156.39 143.29 162.67 154.76 150.88 148.79 165.33 150.67 163.57 164.49 164.67 92.3% 88.6% 88.6% 93.4% 90.7% 89.7% 90.5% 86.5% 88.9% 89.6% 88.2% 83.3% 89.9% 91.6% 87.4% 83.7% 87.8% 93.0% 83.9% 89.3% 87.9% 81.2% 86.9% 88.1% 91.2% 87.3% 83.4% 92.2% 89.4% 87.9% 80.5% 91.4% 0.0% 86.9% 84.8% 83.6% 0.0% 92.9% 84.6% 91.9% 92.4% 92.5% 167.86 164.09 155.73 169.33 165.94 166.08 145.85 169.21 162.40 164.57 164.43 162.59 169.50 164.34 167.71 165.24 168.42 167.57 166.86 168.80 165.35 168.22 169.07 167.34 164.86 166.87 155.60 153.50 164.61 162.56 163.77 171.00 166.67 162.90 166.82 168.92 168.00 94.3% 92.2% 87.5% 95.1% 93.2% 93.3% 81.9% 95.1% 91.2% 92.5% 92.4% 91.3% 95.2% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.2% 92.8% 94.6% 94.1% 93.7% 94.8% 92.9% 94.5% 95.0% 94.0% 92.6% 93.7% 87.4% 86.2% 92.5% 91.3% 92.0% 96.1% 93.6% 91.5% 93.7% 94.9% 94.4% 172.95 169.53 164.95 169.67 171.24 163.71 160.94 170.86 103.75 163.31 155.90 140.05 164.31 125.67 154.12 158.55 161.92 146.77 168.11 158.92 165.10 162.69 164.44 149.56 163.59 155.34 154.43 164.78 158.33 155.85 155.21 148.55 168.00 170.25 154.03 162.84 168.15 164.50 97.2% 95.2% 92.7% 95.3% 96.2% 92.0% 90.4% 96.0% 58.3% 91.7% 87.6% 78.7% 92.3% 70.6% 86.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 89.1% 91.0% 82.5% 94.4% 89.3% 92.8% 91.4% 92.4% 84.0% 91.9% 87.3% 86.8% 92.6% 88.9% 87.6% 87.2% 83.5% 94.4% 95.6% 86.5% 91.5% 172.09 166.81 168.79 157.00 169.53 165.15 147.75 167.36 145.33 163.74 159.25 142.83 163.97 170.75 157.19 157.70 155.76 164.28 158.47 157.76 167.03 161.41 129.73 170.59 163.71 159.00 96.7% 93.7% 94.8% 88.2% 95.2% 92.8% 83.0% 94.0% 81.6% c c. c C c c C 94.5% 92.4% 158.36 167.79 162.33 159.83 155.89 139.23 130.00 156.86 152.33 169.31 167.95 172.75 92.0% 89.5% 80.2% 92.1% 95.9% 88.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 88.6% 87.5% 92.3% 89.0% 88.6% 93.8% 90.7% 72.9% 95.8% 92.0% 89.3% 89.0% 94.3% 91.2% 89.8% 87.6% 78.2% 73.0% 88.1% 85.6% 95.1% 94.4% 97.1% C c c c c c c c c c C C c I I , I c c c c c c C*' c* c c c c I I I I I I I I I ILittle Rock School District Por^'olio Page 35 of 35 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present 2000-01 Percent Rate Other Total Franklin A-A White Hispanic Other Total 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 -J 'J Gibbs Chicot Western Hills Jefferson Cloverdale Dodd Meadowcliff Mitchell A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other 151.00 159.99 160.03 162.50 156.25 171.00 160.10 166.24 162.69 145.71 153.50 163.98 158.66 150.49 157.19 163.08 157.42 159.58 156.69 166.08 167.00 159.09 156.68 163.25 154.50 156.83 160.38 155.71 156.62 155.93 155.50 155.77 160.08 155.21 152.08 84.8% 89.9% 89.9% 91.3% 87.8% 96.1% 89.9% 93.4% 91.4% 81.9% 86.2% 92.1% ^94% 84.5% Total A-A White Hispanic Other 158.28 160.03 152.62 144.29 Total A-A White Hispanic 157.84 156.63 152.64 151.00 88.3% 91.6% 88.4% 89.7% 88.0% 93.3% 93.8% 89.4% 88.0% 91.7% 86.8% 88.1% 90.1% 87.5% 88.0% 87.6% 87.4% 87.5% 89.9% 87.2% 85.4% 0.0% 88.9% 89.9% 85.7% 81.1% 0.0% 88.7% 88.0% 85.8% 84.8% Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate 166.43 164.19 158.84 163.60 161.25 169.00 159.01 164.02 162.37 165.56 163.40 163.34 158.47 152.04 153.30 162.40 156.92 162.12 162.38 155.59 164.50 161.93 157.87 163.14 156.67 169.40 160.86 154.60 158.23 150.70 162.33 154.43 156.03 156.59 163.72 155.00 156.58 162.20 158.80 158.50 171.25 161.51 158.72 166.63 149.00 93.5% 92.2% 89.2% 91.9% 90.6% 94.9% 89.3% 92.1% 91.2% 168.00 168.20 93.0% 91.8% 91.8% 89.0% 85.4% 86.1% 91.2% 88.2% 91.1% 91.2% 87.4% 92.4% 91.0% 88.7% 91.7% 88.0% 95.2% 90.4% 86.9% 88.9% 166.82 167.17 170.00 173.00 166.86 169.16 168.30 163.13 170.89 168.68 165.75 163.88 166.28 168.50 165.68 167.85 166.90 168.86 168.00 167.70 164.71 167.75 167.25 169.88 94.4% 94.5% 93.7% 93.9% 95.5% 97.2% 93.7% 95.0% 94.6% 91.6% 96.0% 94.8% 93.1% 92.1% 156.21 166.08 159.42 154.00 0.00 170.33 159.40 87.8% 93.3% 166.31 168.20 84.7% 91.2% 86.8% 87.7% 88.0% 92.0% 87.1% 88.0% 91.1% 89.2% 89.0% 96.2% 90.7% 89.2% 93.6% 83.7% 166.46 165.91 161.13 164.61 167.00 165.59 167.70 166.71 162.27 166.99 167.71 156.73 164.48 171.00 165.35 167.18 168.00 136.00 t 93.4% 94.7% 93.1% 94.3% 93.8% 94.9% 94.4% 94.2% 92.5% 94.2% 94.0% 95.4% 93.5% 93.2% 90.5% 92.5% 93.8% 93.0% 94.2% 93.7% 91.2% 0.0% 93.8% 94.2% 88.1% 92.4% 96.1% 92.9% 93.9% 94.4% 76.4% 167.60 163.28 167.38 171.42 165.95 160.67 153.48 158.65 169.00 159.66 162.26 157.63 165.75 146.00 161.55 161.40 163.38 167.00 169.75 162.63 152.70 144.13 157.53 158.50 153.20 161.53 154.23 166.40 159.67 160.61 153.48 165.12 172.50 160.12 159.27 144.50 173.00 89.6% 86.5% 0.0% 95.7% 89.6% 94.2% 91.7% 94.0% 96.3% 93.2% 90.3% 86.2% 89.1% 94.9% 89.7% 91.2% 88.6% 93.1% 82.0% 90.8% 90.7% 91.8% 93.8% 95.4% 91.4% 85.8% 81.0% 88.5% 89.0% 86.1% 90.7% 86.6% 93.5% 0.0% 89.7% 90.2% 86.2% 92.8% 96.9% 90.0% 89.5% 81.2% 97.2% 159.32 147.44 174.00 34.50 157.78 170.30 162.48 168.75 173.07 167.35 165.04 162.05 165.60 56.50 164.50 166.57 158.53 162.21 153.50 165.00 165.35 166.01 168.00 173.33 165.84 162.47 160.53 166.70 171.00 163.17 161.95 157.50 156.05 159.66 166.85 154.46 170.75 176.50 165.45 160.45 137.60 0.00 93.4% 94.5% 89.5% 82.8% 97.8% 19.4% 88.6% 95.7% 91.3% 94.8% 97.2% 94.0% 92.7% 91.0% 93.0% 31.7% 92.4% 93.6% 89.1% 91.1% 86.2% 92.7% 92.9% 93.3% 94.4% 97.4% 93.2% 91.3% 90.2% 93.7% 96.1% 91.7% 91.0% 88.5% 87.7% 0.0% 89.7% 93.7% 86.8% 95.9% 99.2% 92.9% 90.1% 77.3% 0.0%Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 36 of 36 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present 2000-01 Percent Rate Other Total King A-A White Hispanic Other Total Rockefeller A-A White Hispanic Other Total 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 Geyer Springs A-A White Hispanic Other Total Pulaski Heights A-A White Hispanic Other Total Rightsell A-A White Total Romine A-A 0.00 156.45 162.18 161.89 167.90 153.14 161.83 165.30 164.38 167.50 171.50 165.06 0.0% 87.9% 91.1% 90.9% 94.3% 86.0% 90.9% 92.9% 92.3% 94.1% 96.3% 92.7% 159.91 \u0026lt;89.8% 152.17 143.11 158.63 158.22 163.15 145.00 160.18 158.45 163.00  White Hispanic Other Total Stephens A-A White Hispanic Other Total Washington A-A White Hispanic Other Total Williams A-A W hite Hispanic Other Total c c c c c c Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate c, 158.48 163.42 141.02 148.97 155.57 156.97 158.17 155.67 151.17 152.00 157.85 159.90 156.37 160.47 162.50 159.06 164.64 164.29 76.00 162.04 164.16 0.00 158.87 166.01 162.81 169.79 165.05 164.68 165.23 166.39 167.80 169.57 165.78 160.21 85.5% 80.4% 0.0% 89.1% 88.9% 91.7% 0.0% 81.5% 90.0% 89.0% 91.6% 89.0% 91.8% 79.2% 83.7% 87.4% 88.2% 88.9% 87.5% 84.9% 85.4% 88.7% 89.8% 87.8% 90.2% 91.3% 89.4% 92.5% 92.3% 42.7% 91.0% 92.2% 155.75 161.79 120.00 159.74 158.89 163.01 166.50 168.00 161.12 155.13 152.50 155.11 164.18 154.02 159.69 163.75 161.79 154.10 146.56 164.50 154.00 154.19 162.56 153.95 155.69 159.86 159.25 166.78 161.04 163.00 158.55 163.85 0.0% 89.3% 93.3% 91.5% 95.4% 92.7% 92.5% 92.8% 93.5% 94.3% 95.3% 93.1% 90.0% 87.5% 90.9% 67.4% 89.7% 89.3% 91.6% 93.5% 94.4% 90.5% 87.2% 85.7% 87.1% 92.2% 86.5% 89.7% 92.0% 90.9% 86.6% 82.3% 92.4% 86.5% 86.6% 91.3% 86.5% 87.5% 89.8% 89.5% 93.7% 90.5% 91.6% 89.1% 92.1% 0.00 166.97 169.71 168.11 170.50 170.44 169.06 167.22 166.56 136.37 169.50 166.17 166.50 164.61 161.53 0.00 166.09 166.64 166.08 171.00 168.78 166.45 165.61 0.00 165.61 167.93 162.17 156.90 148.14 164.57 164.72 162.75 163.25 162.00 164.62 167.66 165.30 158.66 164.04 165.95 169.56 166.14 165.50 165.50 167.82 0.0% 93.8% 95.3% 94.4% 95.8% 95.8% 95.0% 93.9% 93.6% 76.6% 95.2% 93.4% 93.5% 92.5% 90.7% 0.0% 93.3% 93.6% 93.3% 96.1% 94.8% 93.5% 93.0% 0.0% 93.0% 94.3% 91.1% 88.1% 83.2% 92.5% 92.5% 0.00 159.09 165.94 165.62 146.25 165.88 165.67 159.26 161.97 168.75 156.00 160.40 158.61 164.55 153.14 0.00 158.79 162.66 168.12 173.50 163.55 165.30 158.61 165.00 158.63 164.43 145.73 154.65 129.25 91.4% 91.7% 91.0% 92.5% 94.2% 92.9% 89.1% 92.2% 93.2% 95.3% 93.3% 93.0% 93.0% 94.3% 158.95 159.59 159.64 148.94 164.33 159.30 165.50 159.86 159.75 155.68 163.16 165.05 165.91 168.00 164.31 165.34 0.0% 89.4% 93.2% 93.0% 82.2% 93.2% 93.1% 89.5% 91.0% 94.8% 87.6% 90.1% 89.1% 92.4% 86.0% 0.0% 89.2% 91.4% 94.4% 97.5% 91.9% 92.9% 89.1% 92.7% 89.1% 92.4% 81.9% 86.9% 72.6% 89.3% 89.7% 89.7% 83.7% 92.3% 89.5% 93.0% 89.8% 89.7% 87.5% 91.7% 92.7% 93.2% 94.4% 92.3% 92.9% 42.00 158.95 169.86 172.43 153.14 171.12 170.62 163.11 169.11 164.13 171.42 164.93 161.33 144.10 156.60 0.00 160.12 167.30 165.59 172.50 156.63 166.20 164.94 0.00 164.94 165.42 157.11 161.13 170.67 164.16 156.79 152.60 142.20 168.00 156.39 162.43 163.59 165.39 164.00 162.86 169.96 167.06 169.63 168.02 168.70 23.6% 89.3% 95.4% 96.9% 86.0% 96.1% 95.9% 91.6% 95.0% 92.2% 96.3% 92.7% 90.6% 81.0% 88.0% 0.0% 90.0% 94.0% 93.0% 96.9% 88.0% 93.4% 92.7% 0.0% 92.7% 92.9% 88.3% 90.5% 95.9% 92.2% 88.1% 85.7% 79.9% 94.4% 87.9% 91.3% 91.9% 92.9% 92.1% 91.5% 95.5% 93.9% 95.3% 94.4% 94.8% c c* C- c. c c\nc. c\nq: c\nc: c: c: c: c: c: c c c c: c: q: c: c: c: C' cLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 37 of 37  Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present 2000-01 Percent Rate 2001-02 Days Present 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate I Wilson A-A White Hispanic Other Total Woodruff A-A White  Hispanic Other Total Mabelvale A-A White Hispanic Other Total Terry A-A White Hispanic Other Total Fulbright A-A White Hispanic Other Total Otter Creek A-A White Hispanic Other Total Wakefield A-A White Hispanic Other Total Watson A-A White Watson Hispanic Other Total LRSD-R A-A White Total Total A-A Elementary While 155.48 148.63 169.00 164.67 155.19 155.59 153.44 144.00 155.50 155.24 155.13 154.40 162.00 \u0026lt;91.0% 121.50 154.80 158.67 155.80 154.48 163.37 157.48 157.49 161.28 166.00 162.88 159.80 159.44 160.38 161.06 131.57 159.36 153.43 148.52 160.07 109.75 153.64 156.63 140.82 159.63 172.00 156.33 149.59 152.85 150.07 158.67 158.52 87.3% 83.5% 94.9% 92.5% 87.2% 87.4% 86.2% 80.9% 87.4% 87.2% 87.2% 86.7% 68.3% 87.0% 89.1% 87.5% 86.8% 91.8% 88.5% 88.5% 90.6% 93.3% 91.5% 89.8% 89.6% 90.1% 90.5% 73.9% 89.5% 86.2% 83.4% 89.9% 61.7% 86.3% 88.0% 79.1% 89.7% 96.6% 87.8% 84.0% 85.9% 84.3% 89.1% 89.1% 154.75 162.91 172.25 143.80 155.17 157.63 160.31 117.00 109.50 157.12 159.02 152.20 153.78 157.16 161.59 154.80 138.32 136.94 155.59 157.05 161.00 138.00 151.00 159.21 160.36 157.52 157.75 166.38 159.26 156.44 130.21 154.57 0.00 154.97 157.03 118.29 161.40 110.00 155.82 149.74 114.71 146.72 158.99 158.54 86.9% 91.5% 96.8% 80.8% 87.2% 88.6% 90.1% 65.7% 61.5% 88.3% 89.3% 85.5% 86.4% 0.0% 88.3% 90.8% 87.0% 77.7% 76.9% 87.4% 88.2% 90.4% 77.5% 84.8% 89.4% 90.1% 88.5% 88.6% 93.5% 89.5% 87.9% 73.2% 86.8% 0.0% 87.1% 88.2% 66.5% 90.7% 61.8% 87.5% 84.1% 64.4% 82.4% 89.3% 89.1% 165.61 168.00 166.33 171.25 165.82 165.68 163.35 0.00 166.50 165.45 166.06 163.52 168.86 172.00 165.67 167.53 165.62 167.16 164.65 166.66 166.27 167.52 169.75 169.10 167.10 166.87 166.14 159.33 164.38 166.38 164.73 168.00 165.00 164.00 164.82 165.86 157.08 164.79 0.00 165.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 166.55 165.86 93.0% 94.4% 93.4% 96.2% 93.2% 93.1% 91.8% 0.0% 93.5% 92.9% 93.3% 91.9% 94.9% 96.6% 93.1% 94.1% 93.0% 93.9% 92.5% 93.6% 93.4% 94.1% 95.4% 95.0% 93.9% 93.7% 93.3% 89.5% 92.3% 93.5% 92.5% 94.4% 92.7% 92.1% 92.6% 93.2% 88.2% 92.6% 0.0% 93.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.6% 93.2% 157.66 163.59 166.45 161.00 158.38 161.51 146.24 0.00 166.00 160.03 161.79 153.23 167.44 164.83 160.62 162.66 160.27 161.58 164.32 161.88 164.91 163.80 155.67 161.42 164.00 158.13 160.62 151.78 162.50 158.77 150.32 167.14 162.60 0.00 152.43 157.12 152.18 158.57 172.00 157.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.61 162.21 88.6% 91.9% 93.5% 90.4% 89.0% 90.7% 82.2% 0.0% 93.3% 89.9% 90.9% 86.1% 94.1% 92.6% 90.2% 91.4% 90.0% 90.8% 92.3% 90.9% 92.6% 92.0% 87.5% 90.7% 92.1% 88.8% 90.2% 85.3% 91.3% 89.2% 84.4% 93.9% 91.3% 0.0% 85.6% 88.3% 85.5% 89.1% 96.6% 88.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.2% 91.1% 165.75 165.77 168.75 175.25 166.01 158.63 142.25 159.00 64.00 156.97 162.49 150.53 151.46 111.33 159.65 163.90 161.20 154.51 150.00 161.33 166.63 166.21 168.33 151.29 165.91 165.86 163.57 169.67 149.89 165.06 160.74 163.29 159.11 0.00 160.50 159.06 135.00 163.20 25.00 158.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 163.45 163.42 93.1% 93.1% 94.8% 98.5% 93.3% 89.1% 79.9% 89.3% 36.0% 88.2% 91.3% 84.6% 85.1% 62.5% 89.7% 92.1% 90.6% 86.8% 84.3% 90.6% 93.6% 93.4% 94.6% 85.0% 93.2% 93.2% 91.9% 95.3% 84.2% 92.7% 90.3% 91.7% 89.4% 0.0% 90.2% 89.4% 75.8% 91.7% 14.0% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.8% 91.8%Little Rock School District Portfolio School Page 38 of 38 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present Hispanic Other Total 154.30 155.83 158.43 Middle School Mann A-A White Hispanic Other Total Dunbar A-A White Hispanic Other Total Forest Heights Pulaski Heights Southwest Henderson Cloverdale Cloverdale Mabelvale Garland A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A W'hite Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A 2000-01 Percent Rate 86.7% 87.5% 89.0% 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 163.92 159.38 165.81 159.17 161.88 164.51 164.26 162.60 c c c c c c Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate 154.88 156.38 158.66 87.0% 87.9% 89.1% 163.22 166.48 166.23 91.7% 93.5% 93.4% 159.94 161.13 160.99 89.9% 90.5% 90.4% 162.49 157.81 163.26 91.3% 88.7% 91.7% c c C 92.1% 89.5% 93.2% 89.4% 90.9% 92.4% 92.3% 91.3% 169.76 ^5^ 164.57 161.25 160.85 146.88 162.50 160.91 155.62 162.67 155.33 167.50 158.72 155.07 138.22 102.77 0.00 152.95 159.61 152.98 163.00 165.56 158.60 157.61 138.15 151.27 169.13 155.93 157.95 155.45 143.58 165.90 157.24 109.93 92.5% 90.6% 90.4% 82.5% 91.3% 90.4% 87.4% 91.4% 87.3% 94.1% 89.2% 87.1% 77.7% 57.7% 0.0% 85.9% 89.7% 85.9% 91.6% 93.0% 89.1% 88.5% 77.6% 85.0% 95.0% 87.6% 88.7% 87.3% 80.7% 93.2% 88.3% 61.8% 164.94 163.23 167.79 165.14 164.26 166.30 164.28 155.77 166.35 165.24 162.72 164.43 160.71 127.13 162.87 156.19 163.39 143.00 154.89 159.20 156.91 155.10 144.28 0.00 156.64 163.02 149.27 162.00 115.38 160.14 163.30 163.22 162.60 170.67 163.28 161.72 150.36 148.83 167.92 159.51 120.10 92.7% 91.7% 94.3% 92.8% 92.3% 93.4% 92.3% 87.5% 93.5% 92.8% 91.4% 92.4% 90.3% 71.4% 91.5% 87.7% 91.8% 80.3% 87.0% 89.4% 88.2% 87.1% 81.1% 0.0% 88.0% 91.6% 83.9% 91.0% 64.8% 90.0% 91.7% 91.7% 91.3% 95.9% 91.7% 90.9% 84.5% 83.6% 94.3% 89.6% 67.5% 167.92 167.53 170.18 170.80 167.89 168.89 166.37 164.52 168.24 167.87 166.08 165.16 171.92 136.50 165.75 164.80 166.97 170.42 171.20 165.78 162.96 142.80 158.88 169.25 162.17 167.08 161.16 155.42 168.21 165.45 168.83 157.49 166.79 171.83 168.09 167.35 163.65 168.42 171.90 166.62 130.16 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 96.0% 94.3% 94.9% 93.5% 92.4% 94.5% 94.3% 93.3% 92.8% 96.6% 76.7% 93.1% 92.6% 93.8% 95.7% 96.2% 93.1% 91.6% 80.2% 89.3% 95.1% 91.1% 93.9% 90.5% 87.3% 94.5% 92.9% 94.8% 88.5% 93.7% 96.5% 94.4% 94.0% 91.9% 94.6% 96.6% 93.6% 73.1% 165.58 163.74 156.33 166.02 164.60 167.70 162.77 164.61 158.91 165.54 162.64 155.81 166.65 167.67 161.13 157.17 164.21 167.67 170.71 160.08 156.74 139.41 149.38 167.25 156.30 163.28 157.10 166.51 161.71 162.83 161.62 138.82 158.08 175.00 160.23 165.66 157.09 149.11 135.17 163.15 114.98 93.0% 92.0% 87.8% 93.3% 92.5% 94.2% 91.4% 92.5% 89.3% 93.0% 91.4% 87.5% 93.6% 94.2% 90.5% 88.3% 92.3% 94.2% 95.9% 89.9% 88.1% 78.3% 83.9% 94.0% 87.8% 91.7% 88.3% 93.5% 90.8% 91.5% 90.8% 78.0% 88.8% 98.3% 90.0% 93.1% 88.3% 83.8% 75.9% 91.7% 64.6% 167.07 163.99 162.97 165.89 165.57 170.64 167.66 165.70 165.56 169.28 168.12 168.45 173.10 174.43 168.36 160.46 165.12 167.50 157.08 162.41 159.16 159.80 157.45 174.25 159.21 168.18 160.43 160.48 177.19 167.02 168.53 161.90 166.20 177.83 168.01 169.14 159.41 156.44 167.24 111.15 93.9% 92.1% 91.6% 93.2% 93.0% 95.9% 94.2% 93.1% 93.0% 95.1% 94.4% 94.6% 97.2% 98.0% 94.6% 90.1% 92.8% 94.1% 88.2% 91.2% 89.4% 89.8% 88.5% 97.9% 89.4% 94.5% 90.1% 90.2% 99.5% 93.8% 94.7% 91.0% 93.4% 99.9% 94.4% 95.0% 89.6% 87.9% 0.0% 94.0% 62.4% c c c c C C c c. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c       Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 39 of 39 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present 2000-01 Percent Rate White Hispanic Other Total Total Middle A-A School White Hispanic Other 59.50 0.00 0.00 108.33 158.57 159.13 151.39 33.4% 0.0% Total 165.36 158.64 0.0% 60.9% 89.1% 89.4% 85.1% 92.9% 89.1% 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 o o Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate 1 110.77 72.50 0.00 118.87 160.87 161.11 157.99 158.30 160.81 62.2% 40.7% 0.0% 66.8% 90.4% 90.5% 88.8% 88.9% 90.3% 89.00 128.75 0.00 129.33 165.90 165.21 163.76 168.27 165.70 50.0% 72.3% 0.0% 72.7% 93.2% 92.8% 92.0% 94.5% 93.1% 106.56 0.00 0.00 114.27 161.49 160.36 160.29 162.68 161.20 59.9% 0.0% 0.0% 64.2% 90.7% 90.1% 90.1% 91.4% 90.6% 107.97 134.00 151.00 111.17 163.39 163.96 164.03 167.36 163.60 60.7% 75.3% 84.8% 62.5% 91.8% 92.1% 92.2% 94.0% 91.9% I t. High Scy^l Central Hall Metro Parkview Fair McClellan McClellan ACC Total High School A-A White 152.55 157.36 85.7% 88.4% Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic 131.81 \u0026lt;74.1% 166.40 154.70 147.87 150.48 131.38 157.85 147.55 0.00 0.00 165.18 161.53 158.43 167.71 163.52 156.04 157.78 150.65 171.17 156.34 157.03 149.28 156.00 162.75 156.42 92.77 94.85 108.13 144.00 93.65 151.95 155.21 138.12 152.51 157.48 93.5% 86.9% 83.1% 84.5% 73.8% 88.7% 82.9% 0.0% 0.0% 92.8% 90.7% 89.0% 94.2% 91.9% 87.7% 88.6% 84.6% 96.2% 87.8% 88.2% 83.9% 87.6% 91.4% 87.9% 52.1% 53.3% 60.7% 80.9% 52.6% 85.4% 87.2% 77.6% 157.77 163.84 154.85 149.87 144.33 147.51 162.25 148.66 0.00 0.00 165.42 161.19 163.83 168.92 163.55 155.05 153.51 151.95 168.67 154.80 159.19 154.69 154.31 0.00 158.80 84.27 86.53 53.00 16.00 83.74 152.60 153.95 148.63 85.7% 88.5% 88.6% 92.0% 87.0% 84.2% 81.1% 82.9% 91.2% 83.5% 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 90.6% 92.0% 94.9% 91.9% 87.1% 86.2% 85.4% 94.8% 87.0% 89.4% 86.9% 86.7% 0.0% 89.2% 47.3% 48.6% 29.8% 9.0% 47.0% 85.7% 86.5% 83.5% 161.76 164.00 162.70 170.98 162.90 158.91 153.77 148.48 166.71 157.26 52.71 52.71 169.92 166.25 158.48 169.33 167.95 164.33 153.12 163.47 170.08 162.27 164.31 159.32 168.94 172.00 164.12 117.34 103.60 73.67 0.00 114.19 161.46 160.86 153.40 90.9% 92.1% 91.4% 96.1% 91.5% 89.3% 86.4% 83.4% 93.7% 88.3% 29.6% 29.6% 95.5% 93.4% 89.0% 95.1% 94.4% 92.3% 86.0% 91.8% 95.6% 91.2% 92.3% 89.5% 94.9% 96.6% 92.2% 65.9% 58.2% 41.4% 0.0% 154.42 158.42 161.86 164.41 156.48 148.30 147.21 146.53 152.52 148.05 46.00 46.00 166.63 162.48 165.01 169.76 164.94 158.38 153.22 161.39 163.38 157.68 155.81 152-51 143.25 167.50 155.42 67.85 86.8% 89.0% 90.9% 92.4% 87.9% 83.3% 82.7% 82.3% 85.7% 83.2% 25.8% 25.8% 93.6% 91.3% 92.7% 95.4% 92.7% 89.0% 86.1% 90.7% 91.8% 88.6% 87.5% 85.7% 80.5% 94.1% 87.3% 38.1% 167.31 169.14 165.97 173.36 168.29 162.04 152.99 161.10 149.44 160.59 0.00 0.00 173.58 171.20 167.52 175.19 172.41 169.59 164.86 165.52 156.28 168.81 162.49 155.87 162.26 172.25 162.14 107.17 94.0% 95.0% 93.2% 97.4% 94.5% 91.0% 85.9% 90.5% 84.0% 90.2% 0.0% 0.0% 97.5% 96.2% 94.1% 98.4% 96.9% 95.3% 92.6% 93.0% 87.8% 94.8% 91.3% 87.6% 91.2% 96.8% 91.1% 60.2% 64.2% 90.7% 90.4% 86.2% 81.50 129.00 0.00 69.36 153.37 157.03 152.69 45.8% 72.5% 0.0% 39.0% 86.2% 88.2% 85.8% 102.50 119.50 144.50 107.46 164.94 166.72 162.51 57.6% 67.1% 81.2% 60.4% 92.7% 93.7% 91.3%Little Rock School District Portfolio School Grad^, K 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 Page 40 of 40 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present 2000-01 Percent Rate 2001-02 2001-02 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 2004-05 Other Total St] ^ace A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total c c c c c Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate 164.79 152.76 92.6% 85.8% 164.01 153.04 92.1% 86.0% 169.59 161.19 95.3% 90.6% 163.85 154.55 92.1% 86.8% 168.05 165.37 94.4% 92.9% c c c c Little Rock School District c ttendance (Days Present) Averages by Grade Level and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2004-05 2000-01 Days 155.82 Percent 87.5% 157.19 \\88.3% 151.93 . 157.04 156.05 158.09 158.13 151.63 153.44 157.78 159.61 158.14 153.19 157.85 158.98 159.45 160.22 157.32 154.64 159.53 159.21 160.63 156.89 151.50 159.42 160.61 159.77 161.05 164.84 160.47 159.70 158.50 152.98 165.78 159.30 ff.2% 87.7% 88.8% 88.8% 85.2% 86.2% 88.6% 89.7% 88.8% 86.1% 88.7% 89.3% 89.6% 90.0% 88.4% 86.9% 89.6% 89.4% 90.2% 88.1% 85.1% 89.6% 90.2% 89.8% 90.5% 92.6% 90.2% 89.7% 89.0% 85.9% 93.1% 89.5% 2001-02 Days 158.06 157.78 156.87 153.68 157.85 158.62 156.34 154.33 154.46 157.78 159.58 160.01 156.76 158.45 159.55 159.04 158.89 152.99 161.00 158.80 159.65 159.22 154.62 152.04 159.24 160.02 158.47 155.44 163.71 159.48 162.79 161.88 160.99 159.83 162.47 Percent 88.8% 88.6% 88.1% 86.3% 88.7% 89.1% 87.8% 86.7% 86.8% 88.6% 89.7% 89.9% 88.1% 89.0% 89.6% 89.3% 89.3% 85.9% 90.4% 89.2% 89.7% 89.4% 86.9% 85.4% 89.5% 89.9% 89.0% 87.3% 92.0% 89.6% 91.5% 90.9% 90.4% 89.8% 91.3% 2002-03 Days 165.63 165.10 164.26 163.89 165.38 166.00 166.19 165.45 167.56 166.06 167.00 165.62 164.44 168.81 166.57 167.18 164.94 164.48 167.72 166.50 166.87 166.37 159.17 166.89 166.45 167.52 166.71 161.81 171.00 167.14 167.00 165.98 165.27 168.53 166.72 Percent 93.1% 92.8% 92.3% 92.1% 92.9% 93.3% 93.4% 92.9% 94.1% 93.3% 93.8% 93.0% 92.4% 94.8% 93.6% 93.9% 92.7% 92.4% 94.2% 93.5% 93.7% 93.5% 89.4% 93.8% 93.5% 94.1% 93.7% 90.9% 96.1% 93.9% 93.8% 93.2% 92.8% 94.7% 93.7% 2003-04 Days 160.05 161.51 159.18 163.18 160.45 160.37 161.68 160.52 153.49 160.51 159.97 163.41 160.40 161.90 160.92 160.00 162.71 159.33 162.51 160.69 161.61 161.45 161.75 165.47 161.66 162.80 163.38 160.28 157.83 162.78 163.22 159.54 157.04 164.94 162.10 Percent 89.9% 90.7% 89.4% 91.7% 90.1% 90.1% 90.8% 90.2% 86.2% 90.2% 89.9% 91.8% 90.1% 91.0% 90.4% 89.9% 91.4% 89.5% 91.3% 90.3% 90.8% 90.7% 90.9% 93.0% 90.8% 91.5% 91.8% 90.0% 88.7% 91.4% 91.7% 89.6% 88.2% 92.7% 91.1% 2004-05 Days 162.28 163.75 162.16 153.63 162.47 163.00 162.86 159.21 154.05 162.51 164.31 161.74 162.64 145.16 163.18 164.87 164.96 160.62 170.91 164.80 165.06 164.22 162.82 160.10 164.61 164.79 162.86 166.95 166.84 164.48 165.85 164.78 163.92 165.62 165.51 Percent 91.2% 92.0% 91.1% 86.3% 91.3% 91.6% 91.5% 89.4% 86.5% 91.3% 92.3% 90.9% 91.4% 81.6% 91.7% 92.6% 92.7% 90.2% 96.0% 92.6% 92.7% 92.3% 91.5% 89.9% 92.5% 92.6% 91.5% 93.8% 93.7% 92.4% 93.2% 92.6% 92.1% 93.0% 93.0% C c: c c: c. c c c: c c c r c c c c c: c: c c: C' c* c c: c ILittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 41 of 41 Grade 7 Little Rock School District Student Attendance (Days Present) Averages by Grade Level and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2004-05 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Race A-A White Hispanic Other Total  8 9 10 11 12 A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total School Elementary Booker Bale Brady Badgett McDermott Carver Baseline Days 158.42 158.91 148.81 166.17 158.49 159.38 160.37 151.55 163.48 159.48 150.23 155.73 145.25 165.32 151.72 150.15 156.25 131.71 168.60 151.65 152.24 156.10 132.90 160.60 153.13 154.32 152.33 141.22 164.98 153.60 Percent 89.0% 89.3% 83.6% 93.4% 89.0% 89.5% 90.1% 85.1% 91.8% 89.6% 84.4% % %% 92.9% 85.2% 84.4% 87.8% 74.0% 94.7% 85.2% 85.5% 87.7% 74.7% 90.2% 86.0% 86.7% 85.6% 79.3% 92.7% 86.3% Days 161.26 160.71 161.37 160.87 161.12 161.12 161.32 149.75 157.84 160.87 151.66 155.75 151.32 165.62 152.89 151.80 154.97 152.00 167.72 152.90 151.78 151.42 140.13 163.97 151.60 152.74 152.79 143.08 156.71 152.60 Percent 90.6% 90.3% 90.7% 90.4% 90.5% 90.5% 90.6% 84.1% 88.7% 90.4% 85.2% 87.5% 85.0% 93.0% 85.9% 85.3% 87.1% 85.4% 94.2% 85.9% 85.3% 85.1% 78.7% 92.1% 85.2% 85.8% 85.8% 80.4% 88.0% 85.7% Days 166.53 165.08 163.63 169.15 166.13 166.20 164.90 161.36 166.98 165.75 160.31 160.24 156.23 170.16 160.36 161.04 161.21 154.11 168.67 160.94 162.15 161.50 146.16 169.78 161.67 160.30 160.21 156.66 169.25 160.32 Percent 93.6% 92.7% 91.9% 95.0% 93.3% 93.4% 92.6% 90.7% 93.8% 93.1% 90.1% 90.0% 87.8% 95.6% 90.1% 90.5% 90.6% 86.6% 94.8% 90.4% 91.1% 90.7% 82.1% 95.4% 90.8% 90.1% 90.0% 88.0% 95.1% 90.1% Days 161.47 159.45 159.16 159.82 160.88 161.79 162.62 165.49 164.13 162.16 152.24 159.05 157.00 163.01 154.16 154.19 156.07 151.54 166.75 154.88 152.70 155.62 152.36 162.00 153.73 152.46 156.70 148.67 162.91 153.80 Percent 90.7% 89.6% 89.4% 89.8% 90.4% 90.9% 91.4% 93.0% 92.2% 91.1% 85.5% 89.4% 88.2% 91.6% 86.6% 86.6% 87.7% 85.1% 93.7% 87.0% 85.8% 87.4% 85.6% 91.0% 86.4% 85.7% 88.0% 83.5% 91.5% 86.4% I Days 166.30 162.69 165.72 170.20 165.54 165.54 166.38 162.88 166.71 165.62 162.11 165.56 163.60 166.51 163.04 162.39 165.54 160.79 170.59 163.25 164.06 166.96 159.35 172.10 164.95 163.32 167.18 165.90 160.25 164.50 Little Rock School District Average Student Attendance Rates by School 2000-01 to 2005-06 2000-01 Days Present Percent Rate 2001-02 Days Present Percent Rate 2002-03 Days Present Percent Rate 2003-04 Days Present Percent Rate Percent 93.4% 91.4% 93.1% 95.6% 93.0% 93.0% 93.5% 91.5% 93.7% 93.0% 91.1% 93.0% 91.9% 93.5% 91.6% 91.2% 93.0% 90.3% 95.8% 91.7% 92.2% 93.8% 89.5% 96.7% 92.7% 91.8% 93.9% 93.2% 90.0% 92.4% 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate 161.18 93.2% 161.50 1 I 158.02 157.48 143.20 158.39 160.19 157.37 91.3% 91.0% 82.8% 91.6% 92.6% 91.0% 159.57 155.62 149.42 156.83 159.19 154.76 93.4% 92.2% 90.0% 86.4% 90.7% 92.0% 89.5% 165.94 164.57 164.34 0 95.9% 95.1% 95.0% 0.0% 171.24 163.31 154.12 166.86 167.34 164.61 96.5% 96.7% 95.2% 0 158.92 163.59 155.85 99.0% 94.4% 89.1% 0.0% 91.9% 94.6% 90.1% 169.53 163.74 157.19 0 157.76 163.71 159.83 98.0% 94.6% 90.9% 0.0% 91.2% 94.6% 92.4%4. Little Rock School District Portfolio School Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Gibbs Chicot Western Hills Jefferson Cioverdaie Dodd Meadowcliff Mitchell JSms______ Rockefeller Geyer Springs Pulaski Heights Rightsell______ Romine Stephens Washington Williams Wilson Woodruff Mabcivaie Terrv Fulbright Otter Creek Page 42 of 42 Little Rock School District Average Student Attendance Rates by School 2000-01 to 2005-06 2000-01 Days Present 149.60 159.99 160.10 163.98 157.42 159.09 160.38 155.77 158.28 157.84 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05  Wakefield Watson LRSD-R Total Elementary Middle School Mann Dunbar Forest Heights Pulaski Heights Southwest Henderson Cioverdaie Mabelvale Garland Total Middle High School c c c Percent Rate 86.5% 92.5% 92.5% 94.8% 91.0% 92.0% 92.7% 90.0% 91.5% \\91.2% 156.45 ^.4% 161.83 165.06 158.63 160.18 158.48 156.97 157.85 159.06 164.16 155.19 155.24 154.80 157.48 159.80 159.36 153.64 156.33 150.07 158.43 161.88 164.57 160.91 158.72 152.95 158.60 155.93 157.24 108.33 158.64 95 91 92.6% 91.6% 90.7% 91.2% 91.9% 94.9% 89.7% 89.7% 89.5% 91.0% 92.4% 92.1% 88.8% 90.4% 86.7% 91.6% 93.6% 95.1% 93.0% 91.7% 88.4% 91.7% 90.1% 90.9% 62.6% 91.7% Days Present 150.67 164.19 159.01 163.34 156.92 161.93 160.86 154.43 156.58 161.51 158.87 164.68 165.78 159.74 161.12 155.11 161.79 154.19 159.25 163.85 155.17 157.12 157.16 155.59 159.21 159.26 154.97 155.82 146.72 158.66 164.26 165.24 162.87 159.20 156.64 160.14 163.28 159.51 118.87 160.81 Percent Rate 87.1% 94.9% 91.9% 94.4% 90.7% 93.6% 93.0% 89.3% 90.5% 93.4% 91.8% 95.2% 95.8% 92.3% 93.1% 89.7% 93.5% 89.1% 92.1% 94.7% 89.7% 90.8% 90.8% 89.9% 92.0% 92.1% 89.6% 90.1% 84.8% 91.7% 94.9% 95.5% 94.1% 92.0% 90.5% 92.6% 94.4% 92.2% 68.7% 93.0% Days Present 162.90 168.20 166.86 168.68 165.68 167.70 166.46 165.59 166.99 165.35 166.97 169.06 166.17 166.09 166.45 165.61 164.57 164.62 165.95 167.82 165.82 165.45 165.67 166.66 167.10 166.38 164.82 165.59 0 166.23 167.89 167.87 165.75 165.78 162.17 165.45 168.09 166.62 129.33 165.70 Percent Rate 94.2% 97.2% 96.5% 97.5% 95.8% 96.9% 96.2% 95.7% 96.5% 95.6% 96.5% 97.7% 96.1% 96.0% 96.2% 95.7% 95.1% 95.2% 95.9% 97.0% 95.8% 95.6% 95.8% 96.3% 96.6% 96.2% 95.3% 95.7% 0.0% 96.1% 97.0% 97.0% 95.8% 95.8% 93.7% 95.6% 97.2% 96.3% 74.8% 95.8% Days Present 154.03 166.08 159.40 165.95 159.66 161.55 162.63 153.20 159.67 160.12 159.09 165.67 160.40 158.79 165.30 158.63 158.95 159.30 163.16 165.34 158.38 160.03 160.62 161.88 164.00 158.77 152.43 157.08 0 160.99 164.60 165.54 161.13 160.08 156.30 162.83 160.23 163.15 114.27 161.20 Percent Rate 89.0% 96.0% 92.1% 95.9% 92.3% 93.4% 94.0% 88.6% 92.3% 92.6% 92.0% 95.8% 92.7% 91.8% 95.5% 91.7% 91.9% 92.1% 94.3% 95.6% 91.5% 92.5% 92.8% 93.6% 94.8% 91.8% 88.1% 90.8% 0.0% 93.1% 95.1% 95.7% 93.1% 92.5% 90.3% 94.1% 92.6% 94.3% 66.1% 93.2% Days Present 152.33 168.20 157.78 167.35 164.50 165.00 165.84 163.17 159.66 165.45 158.95 170.62 164.93 160.12 166.20 164.94 164.16 156.39 162.86 168.70 166.01 156.97 159.65 161.33 165.91 165.06 160.50 158.23 0 163.26 165.57 169.28 168.36 162.41 159.21 167.02 168.01 167.24 111.17 163.60 Percent Rate 88.1% 97.2% 91.2% 96.7% 95.1% 95.4% 95.9% 94.3% 92.3% 95.6% 91.9% 98.6% 95.3% 92.6% 96.1% 95.3% 94.9% 90.4% 94.1% 97.5% 96.0% 90.7% 92.3% 93.3% 95.9% 95.4% 92.8% 91.5% 0.0% 94.4% 95.7% 97.8% 97.3% 93.9% 92.0% 96.5% 97.1% 96.1% 64.3% 94.6% C c c c c c c c C c c c c c r r r c r c C C c c? C c: c* C' c* ILittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 43 of 43 Little Rock School District Average Student Attendance Rates by School 2000-01 to 2005-06 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 School Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Centra] Hall Metro Parkview Fair McClellan ACC Total High School 5^ 154.70 147.55 0 163.52 156.34 156.42 93.65 152.76 .ittle Rock lool ithnicity Elemental^^^ Booker A-A White \u0026lt; Hispanic Other Total Bale A-A White Hispanic Other Total Brady A-A White Hispanic Other Total Badgett Badgett A-A White Hispanic Total McDermott A-A White Hispanic Other A-A Carver A-A While Hispanic Other 89.4% 85.3% 0.0% 94.5% 90.4% 90.4% 54.1% 88.3% 154.85 148.66 0 163.55 154.80 158.80 83.74 153.04 89.5% 85.9% 0.0% 94.5% 89.5% 91.8% 48.4% 88.5% 162.9 157.26 52.71 167.95 162.27 164.12 114.19 161.19 94.2% 90.9% 30.5% 97.1% 93.8% 94.9% 66.0% 93.2% 156.48 148.05 46.00 164.94 157.68 155.42 69.36 154.55 90.5% 85.6% 26.6% 95.3% 91.1% 89.8% 40.1% 89.3% 168.29 160.59 0 172.41 168.81 162.14 107.46 165.37 lol District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 1-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate 97.3% 92.8% 0.0% 99.7% 97.6% 93.7% 62.1% 95.6% 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate 163.96 158.32 155.75 143.63 161.18 158.74 160.95 147.14 105.00 158.02 159.75 150.26 155.14 148.11 157.48 92.1% 88.9% 87.5% 80.7% 90.6% 89.2% 90.4% 82.7% 59.0% 88.8% 89.7% 84.4% 87.2% 83.2% 88.5% 164.34 157.78 157.77 166.18 161.50 159.66 161.04 154.00 158.25 159.57 157.08 148.22 160.00 163.00 155.62 145.31 120.92 47.00 143.20 158.20 158.45 160.05 157.69 158.39 161.53 160.03 109.00 159.03 81.6% 67.9% 26.4% 80.4% 88.9% 89.0% 89.9% 88.6% 89.0% 90.7% 89.9% 61.2% 89.3% 148.97 156.20 165.50 149.42 158.91 156.45 144.52 154.69 156.83 162.27 155.33 148.50 164.05 92.3% 88.6% 88.6% 93.4% 90.7% 89.7% 90.5% 86.5% 88.9% 89.6% 88.2% 83.3% 89.9% 91.6% 87.4% 83.7% 87.8% 93.0% 83.9% 89.3% 87.9% 81.2% 86.9% 88.1% 91.2% 87.3% 83.4% 92.2% 167.86 164.09 155.73 169.33 165.94 166.08 145.85 169.21 162.40 164.57 164.43 162.59 169.50 164.34 167.71 165.24 168.42 167.57 166.86 168.80 165.35 168.22 169.07 94.3% 92.2% 87.5% 95.1% 93.2% 93.3% 81.9% 95.1% 91.2% 92.5% 92.4% 91.3% 95.2% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.2% 92.8% 94.6% 172.95 169.53 164.95 169.67 171.24 163.71 160.94 170.86 103.75 163.31 155.90 140.05 164.31 125.67 154.12 158.55 161.92 146.77 97.2% 95.2% 92.7% 95.3% 96.2% 92.0% 90.4% 96.0% 58.3% 91.7% 87.6% 78.7% 92.3% 70.6% 86.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 89.1% 91.0% 82.5% 172.09 166.81 168.79 157.00 169.53 165.15 147.75 167.36 145.33 163.74 159.25 142.83 163.97 170.75 157.19 157.70 155.76 164.28 94.1% 93.7% 94.8% 92.9% 94.5% 95.0% 168.11 158.92 165.10 162.69 164.44 149.56 94.4% 89.3% 92.8% 91.4% 92.4% 84.0% 158.47 157.76 167.03 161.41 129.73 170.59 96.7% 93.7% 94.8% 88.2% 95.2% 92.8% 83.0% 94.0% 81.6% 92.0% 89.5% 80.2% 92.1% 95.9% 88.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 88.6% 87.5% 92.3% 89.0% 88.6% 93.8% 90.7% 72.9% 95.8% 1Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 44 of 44 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present Percent Rate Total Baseline A-A White Hispanic Other 160.19 159.17 155.79 128.36 90.0% 89.4% Total Fair Park A-A White 157.37 150.70 145.89 Forest Park 2001-02 Days Present Percent Rate 2002-03 Days Present Percent Rate 2003-04 Days Present Percent Rate 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate  Franklin Gibbs Chicot Western Hills Jefferson Cloverdale c c. c: c: c: c: Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other 159.19 156.39 159.50 149.60 162.54 158.63 157.50 151.00 159.99 160.03 162.50 156.25 171.00 160.10 166.24 162.69 145.71 153.50 163.98 158.66 150.49 157.19 163.08 157.42 159.58 156.69 166.08 167.00 159.09 156.68 163.25 154.50 156.83 160.38 155.71 156.62 155.93 155.50 87.5% 72.1% 0.0% 88.4% 84.7% 82.0% 0.0% 89.6% 84.0% 91.3% \u0026lt;89.1% 88.5% 84.8% 89.9% 89.9% 91.3% 87.8% 96.1% 89.9% 93.4% 91.4% 81.9% 86.2% 92.1% 89.1% 84.5% 88.3% 91.6% 88.4% 89.7% 88.0% 143.29 162.67 154.76 150.88 148.79 165.33 150.67 163.57 164.49 164.67 166.43 164.19 158.84 163.60 161.25 169.00 159.01 164.02 162.37 165.56 163.40 163.34 158.47 152.04 153.30 162.40 156.92 162.12 162.38 93.3% 93.8% 89.4% 88.0% 91.7% 86.8% 88.1% 90.1% 87.5% 88.0% 87.6% 87.4% 155.59 164.50 161.93 157.87 163.14 156.67 169.40 160.86 154.60 158.23 150.70 162.33 89.4% 87.9% 80.5% 91.4% 0.0% 86.9% 84.8% 167.34 164.86 83.6% 0.0% 92.9% 84.6% 91.9% 92.4% 92.5% 93.5% 92.2% 89.2% 91.9% 90.6% 94.9% 89.3% 92.1% 91.2% 93.0% 91.8% 91.8% 89.0% 85.4% 86.1% 91.2% 88.2% 91.1% 91.2% 87.4% 92.4% 91.0% 88.7% 91.7% 88.0% 95.2% 90.4% 86.9% 88.9% 84.7% 91.2% 166.87 155.60 153.50 164.61 162.56 163.77 171.00 166.67 162.90 166.82 168.92 168.00 168.00 168.20 166.82 167.17 170.00 173.00 166.86 169.16 168.30 163.13 170.89 168.68 165.75 163.88 166.28 168.50 165.68 167.85 166.90 168.86 168.00 167.70 164.71 167.75 167.25 169.88 166.46 165.91 161.13 164.61 167.00 94.0% 92.6% 93.7% 87.4% 86.2% 92.5% 91.3% 92.0% 96.1% 93.6% 91.5% 93.7% 94.9% 94.4% 94.4% 94.5% 93.7% 93.9% 95.5% 97.2% 93.7% 95.0% 94.6% 91.6% 96.0% 94.8% 93.1% 92.1% 93.4% 94.7% 93.1% 94.3% 93.8% 94.9% 94.4% 94.2% 92.5% 94.2% 94.0% 95.4% 93.5% 93.2% 90.5% 92.5% 93.8% 163.59 155.34 154.43 164.78 158.33 155.85 155.21 148.55 168.00 170.25 154.03 162.84 168.15 164.50 156.21 166.08 159.42 154.00 0.00 170.33 159.40 167.60 163.28 167.38 171.42 165.95 160.67 91.9% 87.3% 86.8% 92.6% 88.9% 87.6% 87.2% 83.5% 94.4% 95.6% 86.5% 91.5% 94.5% 92.4% 87.8% 93.3% 89.6% 86.5% 0.0% 95.7% 89.6% 94.2% 91.7% 94.0% 163.71 159.00 158.36 167.79 162.33 159.83 155.89 139.23 130.00 156.86 152.33 169.31 167.95 172.75 166.31 168.20 159.32 147.44 174.00 34.50 157.78 153.48 158.65 169.00 159.66 162.26 157.63 165.75 146.00 161.55 161.40 163.38 167.00 169.75 162.63 152.70 144.13 157.53 158.50 92.0% 89.3% 89.0% 94.3% 91.2% c: c: c\nc 96.3% 93.2% 90.3% 86.2% 89.1% 94.9% 89.7% 91.2% 88.6% 93.1% 82.0% 90.8% 90.7% 91.8% 93.8% 95.4% 91.4% 85.8% 81.0% 88.5% 89.0% 170.30 162.48 168.75 173.07 167.35 165.04 162.05 165.60 56.50 164.50 166.57 158.53 162.21 153.50 165.00 165.35 166.01 168.00 173.33 165.84 162.47 160.53 166.70 171.00 89.8% 87.6% 78.2% 73.0% 88.1% 85.6% 95.1% 94.4% 97.1% 93.4% 94.5% 89.5% 82.8% 97.8% 19.4% 88.6% 95.7% 91.3% 94.8% 97.2% 94.0% 92.7% 91.0% 93.0% 31.7% 92.4% 93.6% 89.1% 91.1% 86.2% 92.7% 92.9% 93.3% 94.4% 97.4% 93.2% 91.3% 90.2% 93.7% 96.1% c: c\nc\nc c c c c\nc c c c c c c c c c c c C c: C' C Q- c C CLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 45 of 45 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Dodd Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total Meadowcliff A-A White Hispanic Other Total Mitchell A-A White Hispanic Other Total King A-A White Hispanic Other Total Rockefeller A-A White Hispanic Other Total Geyer Springs A-A White Geyer Springs Hispanic Other Total Pulaski Heights A-A White Hispanic Other Total Rightsell A-A White Total Romine A-A White Hispanic Other Total Stephens A-A 155.77 160.08 155.21 152.08 158.28 160.03 152.62 144.29 157.84 156.63 152.64 151.00 0.00 156.45 162.18 161.89 167.90 153.14 161.83 165.30 164.38 167.50 171.50 165.06 159.91 152.17 143.11 158.63 158.22 163.15 145.00 160.18 158.45 163.00 158.48 163.42 141.02 148.97 155.57 156.97 158.17 87.5% 89.9% 87.2% 85.4% 0.0% 88.9% 89.9% 85.7% 81.1% 0.0% 88.7% 88.0% \u0026lt;85.8% 84.8% 0.0% 87.9% 91.1% 90.9% 94.3% 86.0% 90.9% 92.9% 92.3% 94.1% 96.3% 92.7% 89.8% 85.5% 80.4% 0.0% 89.1% 88.9% 91.7% 0.0% 81.5% 90.0% 89.0% 91.6% 89.0% 91.8% 79.2% 83.7% 87.4% 88.2% 88.9% 154.43 156.03 156.59 163.72 155.00 156.58 162.20 158.80 158.50 171.25 161.51 158.72 166.63 149.00 0.00 158.87 166.01 162.81 169.79 165.05 164.68 165.23 166.39 167.80 169.57 165.78 160.21 155.75 161.79 120.00 159.74 158.89 163.01 166.50 168.00 161.12 155.13 152.50 155.11 164.18 154.02 159.69 163.75 161.79 154.10 86.8% 87.7% 88.0% 92.0% 87.1% 88.0% 91.1% 89.2% 89.0% 96.2% 90.7% 89.2% 93.6% 83.7% 0.0% 89.3% 93.3% 91.5% 95.4% 92.7% 92.5% 92.8% 93.5% 94.3% 95.3% 93.1% 90.0% 87.5% 90.9% 67.4% 89.7% 89.3% 91.6% 93.5% 94.4% 90.5% 87.2% 85.7% 87.1% 92.2% 86.5% 89.7% 92.0% 90.9% 86.6% 165.59 167.70 166.71 162.27 166.99 167.71 156.73 164.48 171.00 165.35 167.18 168.00 136.00 0.00 166.97 169.71 168.11 170.50 170.44 169.06 167.22 166.56 136.37 169.50 166.17 166.50 164.61 161.53 0.00 166.09 166.64 166.08 171.00 168.78 166.45 165.61 0.00 165.61 167.93 162.17 156.90 148.14 164.57 164.72 93.0% 94.2% 93.7% 91.2% 0.0% 93.8% 94.2% 88.1% 92.4% 96.1% 92.9% 93.9% 94.4% 76.4% 0.0% 93.8% 95.3% 94.4% 95.8% 95.8% 95.0% 93.9% 93.6% 76.6% 95.2% 93.4% 93.5% 92.5% 90.7% 0.0% 93.3% 93.6% 93.3% 96.1% 94.8% 93.5% 93.0% 0.0% 93.0% 94.3% 91.1% 88.1% 83.2% 92.5% 92.5% 153.20 161.53 154.23 166.40 159.67 160.61 153.48 165.12 172.50 160.12 159.27 144.50 173.00 0.00 159.09 165.94 165.62 146.25 165.88 165.67 159.26 161.97 168.75 156.00 160.40 158.61 164.55 153.14 0.00 158.79 162.66 168.12 173.50 163.55 165.30 158.61 165.00 158.63 164.43 145.73 154.65 129.25 158.95 159.59 86.1% 90.7% 86.6% 93.5% 0.0% 89.7% 90.2% 86.2% 92.8% 96.9% 90.0% 89.5% 81.2% 97.2% 0.0% 89.4% 93.2% 93.0% 82.2% 93.2% 93.1% 89.5% 91.0% 94.8% 87.6% 90.1% 89.1% 92.4% 86.0% 0.0% 89.2% 91.4% 94.4% 97.5% 91.9% 92.9% 89.1% 92.7% 89.1% 92.4% 81.9% 86.9% 72.6% 89.3% 89.7% 163.17 161.95 157.50 156.05 159.66 166.85 154.46 170.75 176.50 165.45 160.45 137.60 0.00 42.00 158.95 169.86 172.43 153.14 171.12 170.62 163.11 169.11 164.13 171.42 164.93 161.33 144.10 156.60 0.00 160.12 167.30 165.59 172.50 156.63 166.20 164.94 0.00 164.94 165.42 157.11 161.13 170.67 164.16 156.79 91.7% 91.0% 88.5% 87.7% 0.0% 89.7% 93.7% 86.8% 95.9% 99.2% 92.9% 90.1% 77.3% 0.0% 23.6% 89.3% 95.4% 96.9% 86.0% 96.1% 95.9% 91.6% 95.0% 92.2% 96.3% 92.7% 90.6% 81.0% 88.0% 0.0% 90.0% 94.0% 93.0% 96.9% 88.0% 93.4% 92.7% 0.0% 92.7% 92.9% 88.3% 90.5% 95.9% 92.2% 88.1% I i I tLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 46 of 46 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 Days Present Percent Rate White Hispanic Other Total Washington A-A 155.67 151.17 152.00 157.85 159.90 87.5% 84.9% 85.4% 88.7% 89.8% White Hispanic Other 156.37 160.47 87.8% 90.2% Total 162.50 159.06 91.3% 89.4% Williams A-A White 2001-02 Days Present 146.56 164.50 154.00 154.19 162.56 153.95 155.69 159.86 159.25 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Hispanic Other Total Wilson A-A White Hispanic Other 164.64 164.29 76.00 162.04 164.16 155.48 148.63 169.00 Total 164.67 155.19 Woodruff A-A White Hispanic Other 155.59 153.44 144.00 Total Mabelvale A-A White 155.50 155.24 155.13 154.40 92.5% 92.3% 42.7% \u0026lt;91.0% 92.2% 87.3% 83.5% 94.9% 92.5% 87.2% 87.4% 86.2% 80.9% 87.4% 87.2% 87.2% 86.7% 166.78 161.04 163.00 158.55 163.85 154.75 162.91 172.25 143.80 155.17 157.63 160.31 117.00 109.50 157.12 159.02 152.20  Mabelvale Hispanic Other Total 162.00 121.50 154.80 Terry A-A White 158.67 155.80 Fulbright Otter Creek Wakefield c c c c c Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate c Hispanic Other 154.48 163.37 91.0% 68.3% 87.0% 89.1% 87.5% 86.8% 91.8% 153.78 157.16 161.59 154.80 138.32 136.94 82.3% 92.4% 86.5% 86.6% 91.3% 86.5% 87.5% 89.8% 89.5% 93.7% 90.5% 91.6% 89.1% 92.1% 86.9% 91.5% 96.8% 80.8% 87.2% 88.6% 90.1% 65.7% 61.5% 88.3% 89.3% 85.5% 86.4% 0.0% 88.3% 90.8% 87.0% 77.7% 76.9% 162.75 163.25 Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A 157.48 157.49 161.28 166.00 162.88 159.80 159.44 160.38 161.06 131.57 159.36 153.43 88.5% 88.5% 90.6% 93.3% 91.5% 89.8% 89.6% 90.1% 90.5% 73.9% 89.5% 86.2% 155.59 157.05 161.00 138.00 151.00 159.21 160.36 157.52 157.75 166.38 159.26 156.44 87.4% 88.2% 90.4% 77.5% 84.8% 89.4% 90.1% 88.5% 88.6% 93.5% 89.5% 87.9% 162.00 164.62 167.66 165.30 158.66 164.04 165.95 169.56 166.14 165.50 165.50 167.82 165.61 168.00 166.33 171.25 165.82 165.68 163.35 0.00 166.50 165.45 166.06 163.52 168.86 172.00 165.67 167.53 165.62 167.16 164.65 166.66 166.27 167.52 169.75 169.10 167.10 166.87 166.14 159.33 164.38 166.38 164.73 91.4% 91.7% 91.0% 92.5% 94.2% 92.9% 89.1% 92.2% 93.2% 95.3% 93.3% 93.0% 93.0% 94.3% 93.0% 94.4% 93.4% 96.2% 93.2% 93.1% 91.8% 0.0% 93.5% 92.9% 93.3% 91.9% 94.9% 96.6% 93.1% 94.1% 93.0% 93.9% 92.5% 93.6% 93.4% 94.1% 95.4% 95.0% 93.9% 93.7% 93.3% 89.5% 92.3% 93.5% 92.5% 159.64 148.94 164.33 159.30 165.50 159.86 159.75 155.68 163.16 165.05 165.91 168.00 164.31 165.34 157.66 163.59 166.45 161.00 158.38 161.51 146.24 0.00 166.00 160.03 161.79 153.23 167.44 164.83 160.62 162.66 160.27 161.58 164.32 161.88 164.91 163.80 155.67 161.42 164.00 158.13 160.62 151.78 162.50 158.77 150.32 89.7% 83.7% 92.3% 89.5% 93.0% 89.8% 89.7% 87.5% 91.7% 92.7% 93.2% 94.4% 92.3% 92.9% 88.6% 91.9% 93.5% 90.4% 89.0% 90.7% 82.2% 0.0% 93.3% 89.9% 90.9% 86.1% 94.1% 92.6% 90.2% 91.4% 90.0% 90.8% 92.3% 90.9% 92.6% 92.0% 87.5% 90.7% 92.1% 88.8% 90.2% 85.3% 91.3% 89.2% 84.4% 152.60 142.20 168.00 156.39 162.43 163.59 165.39 164.00 162.86 169.96 167.06 169.63 168.02 168.70 165.75 165.77 168.75 175.25 166.01 158.63 142.25 159.00 64.00 156.97 162.49 150.53 151.46 111.33 159.65 163.90 161.20 154.51 150.00 161.33 166.63 166.21 168.33 151.29 165.91 165.86 163.57 169.67 149.89 165.06 160.74 85.7% 79.9% 94.4% 87.9% 91.3% 91.9% 92.9% 92.1% 91.5% 95.5% 93.9% 95.3% 94.4% 94.8% 93.1% 93.1% 94.8% 98.5% 93.3% 89.1% 79.9% 89.3% 36.0% 88.2% 91.3% 84.6% 85.1% 62.5% 89.7% 92.1% 90.6% 86.8% 84.3% 90.6% 93.6% 93.4% 94.6% 85.0% 93.2% 93.2% 91.9% 95.3% 84.2% 92.7% 90.3% c c c c c c c c c c c c\nc c: c c c c c c r C c c c c: c Q' or. c cLittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 47 of 47 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate  White 148.52 Hispanic Other 160.07 109.75 Total Watson A-A White Hispanic Other Total LRSD-R A-A White Total Total A-A Elementary School White Hispanic Other Total 153.64 156.63 140.82 159.63 172.00 156.33 149.59 152.85 150.07 158.67 158.52 154.30 155.83 158.43 83.4% 89.9% 130.21 154.57 61.7% 86.3% 88.0% 79.1% 89.7% 96.6% 87.8% 84.0% 85.9% 84.3% \u0026lt;89.1% 89.1% 86.7% 87.5% 89.0% 0.00 154.97 157.03 118.29 161.40 110.00 155.82 149.74 114.71 146.72 158.99 158.54 154.88 156.38 158.66 73.2% 86.8% 0.0% 87.1% 88.2% 66.5% 90.7% 61.8% 87.5% 84.1% 64.4% 82.4% 89.3% 89.1% 87.0% 87.9% 89.1% 168.00 165.00 164.00 164.82 165.86 157.08 164.79 0.00 165.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 166.55 165.86 163.22 166.48 166.23 94.4% 92.7% 92.1% 92.6% 93.2% 88.2% 92.6% 0.0% 93.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.6% 93.2% 91.7% 93.5% 93.4% 167.14 162.60 0.00 152.43 157.12 152.18 158.57 172.00 157.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.61 162.21 159.94 161.13 160.99 93.9% 91.3% 0.0% 85.6% 88.3% 85.5% 89.1% 96.6% 88.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.2% 91.1% 89.9% 90.5% 90.4% 163.29 159.11 0.00 160.50 159.06 135.00 163.20 25.00 158.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 163.45 163.42 162.49 157.81 163.26 91.7% 89.4% 0.0% 90.2% 89.4% 75.8% 91.7% 14.0% 88.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 91.8% 91.8% 91.3% 88.7% 91.7% Lddle School Mann A-A White Hispanic Other Total Dunhar A-A White Dunbar Hispanic Other Total Forest Heights A-A White Hispanic Other Total Pulaski Heights A-A White Hispanic Other Total Southwest A-A White Hispanic Other Total Henderson A-A White 163.92 159.38 165.81 159.17 161.88 164.51 164.26 162.60 169.76 164.57 161.25 160.85 146.88 162.50 160.91 155.62 162.67 155.33 167.50 158.72 155.07 138.22 102.77 0.00 152.95 159.61 152.98 92.1% 89.5% 93.2% 89.4% 90.9% 92.4% 92.3% 91.3% 95.4% 92.5% 90.6% 90.4% 82.5% 91.3% 90.4% 87.4% 91.4% 87.3% 94.1% 89.2% 87.1% 77.7% 57.7% 0.0% 85.9% 89.7% 85.9% 164.94 163.23 167.79 165.14 164.26 166.30 164.28 155.77 166.35 165.24 162.72 164.43 160.71 127.13 162.87 156.19 163.39 143.00 154.89 159.20 156.91 155.10 144.28 0.00 156.64 163.02 149.27 92.7% 91.7% 94.3% 92.8% 92.3% 93.4% 92.3% 87.5% 93.5% 92.8% 91.4% 92.4% 90.3% 71.4% 91.5% 87.7% 91.8% 80.3% 87.0% 89.4% 88.2% 87.1% 81.1% 0.0% 88.0% 91.6% 83.9% 167.92 167.53 170.18 170.80 167.89 168.89 166.37 164.52 168.24 167.87 166.08 165.16 171.92 136.50 165.75 164.80 166.97 170.42 171.20 165.78 162.96 142.80 158.88 169.25 162.17 167.08 161.16 94.3% 94.1% 95.6% 96.0% 94.3% 94.9% 93.5% 92.4% 94.5% 94.3% 93.3% 92.8% 96.6% 76.7% 93.1% 92.6% 93.8% 95.7% 96.2% 93.1% 91.6% 80.2% 89.3% 95.1% 91.1% 93.9% 90.5% 165.58 163.74 156.33 166.02 164.60 167.70 162.77 164.61 158.91 165.54 162.64 155.81 166.65 167.67 161.13 157.17 164.21 167.67 170.71 160.08 156.74 139.41 149.38 167.25 156.30 163.28 157.10 93.0% 92.0% 87.8% 93.3% 92.5% 94.2% 91.4% 92.5% 89.3% 93.0% 91.4% 87.5% 93.6% 94.2% 90.5% 88.3% 92.3% 94.2% 95.9% 89.9% 88.1% 78.3% 83.9% 94.0% 87.8% 91.7% 88.3% 167.07 163.99 162.97 165.89 165.57 170.64 167.66 165.70 165.56 169.28 168.12 168.45 173.10 174.43 168.36 160.46 165.12 167.50 157.08 162.41 159.16 159.80 157.45 174.25 159.21 168.18 160.43 93.9% 92.1% 91.6% 93.2% 93.0% 95.9% 94.2% 93.1% 93.0% 95.1% 94.4% 94.6% 97.2% 98.0% 94.6% 90.1% 92.8% 94.1% 88.2% 91.2% 89.4% 89.8% 88.5% 97.9% 89.4% 94.5% 90.1%Little Rock School District Portfolio School Cloverdale Mabelvale Garland Total Middle School\nh School Central Hall Metro Parkview Fair Page 48 of 48 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 Ethnicity Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Oth(H^ Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A Total A-A White Hispanic Other Total A-A White Hispanic Other 2000-01 Days Present Percent Rate 2001-02 Days Present Percent Rate 2002-03 Days Present Percent Rate 2003-04 Days Present Percent Rate 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate c c c: c c c c 163.00 165.56 158.60 157.61 138.15 151.27 169.13 155.93 157.95 155.45 143.58 165.90 157.24 109.93 59.50 0.00 0.00 108.33 158.57 159.13 151.39 165.36 158.64 152.55 157.36 131.81 166.40 154.70 147.87 150.48 131.38 157.85 147.55 0.00 0.00 165.18 161.53 158.43 167.71 163.52 156.04 157.78 150.65 171.17 91.6% 93.0% 89.1% 88.5% 77.6% 85.0% 95.0% 87.6% 88.7% 162.00 115.38 160.14 163.30 163.22 162.60 170.67 163.28 161.72 91.0% 64.8% 90.0% 91.7% 91.7% 91.3% 95.9% 91.7% 90.9% 155.42 168.21 165.45 168.83 157.49 87.3% 94.5% 166.51 87.3% 80.7% 93.2% \u0026lt;88.3% 61.8% 33.4% 0.0% 0.0% 60.9% 89.1% 89.4% 85.1% 92.9% 89.1% 85.7% 88.4% 74.1% 93.5% 86.9% 83.1% 84.5% 73.8% 88.7% 82.9% 0.0% 0.0% 92.8% 90.7% 89.0% 94.2% 91.9% 87.7% 88.6% 84.6% 96.2% 150.36 148.83 167.92 159.51 120.10 110.77 72.50 0.00 118.87 160.87 161.11 157.99 158.30 160.81 152.51 157.48 157.77 163.84 154.85 149.87 144.33 147.51 162.25 148.66 0.00 0.00 165.42 161.19 163.83 168.92 163.55 155.05 153.51 151.95 168.67 84.5% 83.6% 94.3% 89.6% 67.5% 62.2% 40.7% 0.0% 66.8% 90.4% 90.5% 88.8% 88.9% 90.3% 166.79 171.83 168.09 167.35 163.65 168.42 171.90 166.62 130.16 89.00 128.75 0.00 129.33 165.90 165.21 163.76 168.27 165.70 92.9% 94.8% 88.5% 93.7% 96.5% 94.4% 94.0% 91.9% 94.6% 96.6% 93.6% 73.1% 50.0% 72.3% 0.0% 72.7% 93.2% 92.8% 92.0% 94.5% 93.1% 161.71 162.83 161.62 138.82 158.08 175.00 160.23 165.66 157.09 149.11 135.17 163.15 114.98 106.56 0.00 0.00 114.27 161.49 160.36 160.29 162.68 161.20 93.5% 90.8% 91.5% 90.8% 78.0% 88.8% 98.3% 90.0% 93.1% 88.3% 83.8% 75.9% 91.7% 64.6% 59.9% 0.0% 0.0% 64.2% 90.7% 90.1% 90.1% 91.4% 90.6% 160.48 177.19 167.02 168.53 161.90 166.20 177.83 168.01 169.14 159.41 156.44 167.24 111.15 107.97 134.00 151.00 111.17 163.39 163.96 164.03 167.36 163.60 90.2% 99.5% 93.8% 94.7% 91.0% 93.4% 99.9% 94.4% 95.0% 89.6% 87.9% 0.0% 94.0% 62.4% 60.7% 75.3% 84.8% 62.5% 91.8% 92.1% 92.2% 94.0% 91.9% c. c: c: c. c\nc. c. c\nc c. c. c. c c: c c c c c 85.7% 88.5% 88.6% 92.0% 87.0% 84.2% 81.1% 82.9% 91.2% 83.5% 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 90.6% 92.0% 94.9% 91.9% 87.1% 86.2% 85.4% 94.8% 161.76 164.00 162.70 170.98 162.90 158.91 153.77 148.48 166.71 157.26 52.71 52.71 169.92 166.25 158.48 169.33 167.95 164.33 153.12 163.47 170.08 90.9% 92.1% 91.4% 96.1% 91.5% 89.3% 86.4% 154.42 158.42 161.86 164.41 156.48 148.30 147.21 86.8% 89.0% 90.9% 92.4% 87.9% 83.3% 82.7% 167.31 169.14 165.97 173.36 168.29 162.04 152.99 83.4% 93.7% 88.3% 29.6% 29.6% 95.5% 93.4% 89.0% 95.1% 94.4% 92.3% 86.0% 91.8% 95.6% 146.53 152.52 148.05 46.00 46.00 166.63 162.48 165.01 169.76 164.94 158.38 153.22 161.39 163.38 82.3% 85.7% 83.2% 25.8% 25.8% 93.6% 91.3% 92.7% 95.4% 92.7% 89.0% 86.1% 90.7% 91.8% 161.10 149.44 160.59 0.00 0.00 173.58 171.20 167.52 175.19 172.41 169.59 164.86 165.52 156.28 94.0% 95.0% 93.2% 97.4% 94.5% 91.0% 85.9% 90.5% 84.0% 90.2% 0.0% 0.0% 97.5% 96.2% 94.1% 98.4% 96.9% 95.3% 92.6% 93.0% 87.8% c c c c c c c: c: c: c: c: c: C'  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 49 of 49 Little Rock School District Student Attendance Averages by School and Ethnicity 2000-01 through 2005-06 School Ethnicity 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Days Present Percent Rate Total McClellan A-A 156.34 157.03  White Hispanic Other 149.28 156.00 162.75 87.8% 88.2% 83.9% 87.6% 91.4% 154.80 159.19 154.69 154.31 0.00 87.0% 89.4% 86.9% 86.7% 0.0% 162.27 164.31 159.32 168.94 172.00 91.2% 92.3% Total ACC A-A White Hispanic Other Total Total High School A-A White Hispanic Other Total 156.42 92.77 94.85 108.13 144.00 93.65 151.95 155.21 138.12 164.79 152.76 87.9% 52.1% 53.3% 60.7% 80.9% 52.6% 85.4% \u0026lt;87.2% 77.6% 92.6% 85.8% 158.80 84.27 86.53 53.00 89.2% 47.3% 48.6% 29.8% 16.00 83.74 152.60 153.95 148.63 164.01 153.04 9.0% 47.0% 85.7% 86.5% 83.5% 92.1% 86.0% 164.12 117.34 103.60 73.67 0.00 114.19 161.46 160.86 153.40 169.59 161.19 89.5% 94.9% 96.6% 92.2% 65.9% 58.2% 41.4% 0.0% 64.2% 90.7% 90.4% 86.2% 95.3% 90.6% 157.68 155.81 152.51 143.25 167.50 155.42 67.85 81.50 129.00 0.00 69.36 153.37 157.03 152.69 163.85 154.55 88.6% 87.5% 85.7% 80.5% 94.1% 87.3% 38.1% 45.8% 72.5% 0.0% 39.0% 86.2% 88.2% 85.8% 92.1% 86.8% 168.81 162.49 155.87 162.26 172.25 162.14 107.17 102.50 119.50 144.50 107.46 164.94 166.72 162.51 168.05 165.37 94.8% 91.3% 87.6% 91.2% 96.8% 91.1% 60.2% 57.6% 67.1% 81.2% 60.4% 92.7% 93.7% 91.3% 94.4% 92.9% 1 I 1 ILittle Rock School District Portfolio Page 50 of 50 c  Grade Level Pre-K 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 Little Rock School District Rate of Student Attendance by Grade Level and Lunch Status 2000-01 through 2005-06 Lunch Status Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total Free/Reduced Paid Total 2000-01 Percent Days Present 2001-02 Percent Days Present 2002-03 Percent Days Present 2003-04 Percent Days Absent 2004-05 Percent Days Present 86.6% 87.7% 87.0% 86.9% 89.0% 87.7% 88.2% 89.5% 88.6% 89.1% 89.6% 89.3% 89.2% 90.4% 89.6% 88.8% 91.0% 89.6% 89.3% 91.4% 90.2% 88.5% 90.9% 89.5% 87.5% 90.7% 89.0% 87.7% 91.5% 89.6% 83.2% 86.6% 85.2% 87.7% 90.5% 88.8% 87.8% 90.3% 88.7% 87.9% 90.0% 88.6% 89.1% 90.6% 89.6% 88.1% 91.1% 89.2% 89.1% 90.1% 89.5% 88.3% 92.0% 89.6% 90.3% 92.7% 91.3% 89.6% 91.7% 90.5% 89.2% 91.7% 90.4% 84.9% 86.7% 85.9% 92.4% 88.4% 87.9% 93.5% 92.8% 92.3% 94.1% 92.9% 92.7% 94.5% 93.3% 93.4% 93.9% 93.6% 93.3% 94.1% 93.5% 93.1% 94.3% 93.5% 93.6% 94.5% 93.9% 93.4% 94.2% 93.7% 93.0% 93.9% 93.3% 92.2% 94.3% 93.1% 88.7% 91.1% 90.1% 90.9% 89.4% 88.9% 92.8% 90.1% 89.2% 92.3% 90.2% 88.9% 93.4% 90.4% 89.1% 92.5% 90.3% 90.0% 92.5% 90.8% 90.3% 93.4% 91.5% 90.4% 92.1% 91.1% 89.2% 92.0% 90.4% 89.6% 92.8% 91.1% 84.4% 88.4% 86.6% 93.2% 89.8% 90.3% 93.3% 91.3% 90.4% 93.2% 91.3% 90.7% 93.8% 91.7% 91.6% 94.5% 92.6% 91.7% 94.1% 92.5% 91.5% 94.2% 92.4% 92.1% 94.5% 93.0% 92.6% 93.8% 93.0% 91.9% 94.9% 93.0% 90.3% 92.9% 91.6% c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 10 Paid Total .4Paid Total Paid Total Paid Grade Level Little Rock School District Portfolio Lunch Status Free/Reduced Free/Reduced Free/Reduced Free/Reduced Total 100.0% 80.0% Little Rock School District Rate of Student Attendance by Grade Level and Lunch Status 2000-01 through 2005-06 2000-01 Percent Days Present 2001-02 Percent Days Present 2002-03 Percent Days Present 2003-04 Percent Days Absent Page 51 of51 2004-05 Percent Days Present 83.5% 85.9% 85.2% 85.0% 86.3% 86.0% 87.4% 86.1% 86.3% 87.7% 88.6% 88.2% 84.8% 86.5% 85.9% 85.1% 85.2% 85.2% 88.4% 85.1% 85.7% 88.2% 89.0% 88.6% 89.5% 91.0% 90.4% 91.0% 90.8% 90.8% 92.4% 89.5% 90.1% 92.5% 92.7% 92.6% Attendance by Lunch Status 2000-2001 through 2004-2005 90.0% 85.0% 95.0% ---- Free/Reduced ---- Paid 1 2 3 4 5 Years 86.0% 87.6% 87.0% 85.8% 86.6% 86.4% 87.6% 86.0% 86.4% 88.8% 90.4% 89.5% 89.9% 93.1% 91.7% 91.7% 93.1% 92.7% 93.8% 91.9% 92.4% 91.1% 93.5% 92.1% Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 52 of 52 c: c\nc: c: Little Rock School District c: Number of Student Discipline Referrals by Grade Level 2000-01 through 2004-05 Year c: cc Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Prc-K K 1 4 6 8 9 10 11 5 8 4 7 11 38 50 65 106 131 141 904 853 747 1,052 584 286 58 70 90 119 136 187 914 968 727 788 666 369 61 127 71 148 135 215 959 1,078 878 1,018 666 403 83 107 162 115 185 220 772 976 880 1,229 715 456 105 149 158 212 170 275 786 869 827 1,243 720 412 c c: c c c Q, Q. c 185 144 201 258 250 Total 5,147 5,328 6,043 6,165 6,187 12 c ccc c c c c c cc c. c. c. c. Q-. q: c. c: c: c c* c  Little Rock School District Portfolio c 200.0 o  150.0 w O 100.0 a\u0026gt; ra . tn Page 53 of 53 50.0 0.0 c 200.0 oI 150.0 00 o Discipline Referrals per 100 students Grades 4 through 8 1 2000-01 O 100.0 - U)  a: * X 8 6 5 50.0 0.0 $ -.-4 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Year Discipline Referrals per 100 students Grades 9 through 12 X- X- 11 10 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Year Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 54 of 54 Little Rock School District Rate of Student Discipline Referrals by Grade Level Events per 100 enrolled students cc c: f Grade / Year Pre-K K 1 2 3 5 6 9 10 11 12 Total (A o o  ci) oo W) m \u0026lt;u O' 140.0 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 2000-01 0.5 2.0 2.5 3.3 5.5 6.6 7.0 46.7 47.5 43.5 52.2 32.2 .'7.6 11.9 20.4 2001-02 0.7 3.0 3.5 4.6 6.2 1.2 9.5 46.7 51.5 41.2 39.5 38.4 23.0 10.2 21.1 2002-03 0.3 3.0 6.4 3.7 7.6 7.2 11.6 49.3 53.6 48.4 50.1 37.5 26.4 14.5 23.9 2003-04 0.7 4.1 5.1 8.2 6.0 9.4 12.0 42.0 49.3 44.8 58.8 40.1 29.2 19.4 2004-05 0.9 8.1 7.4 7.7 10.6 9.0 14.6 40.3 47.4 45.4 66.2 31.0 22.6 16.0 c\nc: c: c: c: 24.4 24.1 c c: c c c\nc c c c c c. c c Discipline Referrals per 100 Students Cohorts of Pre-K through 7th grades 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 3rd to 7th 2nd to 6th 1st to Sth K to 4th  Pre-K to 3rd Year c c: c c c c c c, c c c c  c c Little Rock School District Portfolio o 0^ (A re (Ac re o 3 Ia oo Page 55 of 55 300 0 Discipline Referrals per 100 Students Cohorts of 4th through 12th grades 200 150 100 50 250 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Sth to 12th 7th to 11th 6th to 10th 5th to 9th  4th to Sth Year Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 56 of 56 Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 c c: c\nc: c: c\nc\nc: Elementary Badgett c: 0 p K 0 0 c: 1 2 3 4 5 Total Bale P K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total Baseline P K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total Booker K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Brady P K 1 2 3 4 5 Brady EE 1 7 0 0 0 8 0 5 2 0 0 3 5 15 0 4 1 3 0 2 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 7 0 4 4 0 23 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 6 2 5 2 0 4 6 19 2 2 2 1 1 I 0 0 0 1 4 0 14 0 10 0 29 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1 3 2 0 10 1 7 29 0 1 3 2 3 3 8 0 0 2 2 4 1 15 3 27 0 0 1 0 2 1 11 15 0 0 1 1 12 9 23 0 1 1 1 4 1 6 0 5 0 4 5 7 8 29 0 1 1 3 1 2 9 17 0 1 5 1 3 9 19 1 4 1 0 14 3 0 c\nC c\nc c C- C c\nc. c C C c C C c c: c C C c: c C C c c c c c: c: c\nc: 0 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 57 of 57  7) 7) Carver Chicot Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level Total K 1 2 3 4 5 Total p K 1 1 3 4 5 EE Total 2000-01 7 0 0 1 1 1 7 11 0 0 3 2 3 1 0 9 2001-02 I 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Fair Park Forest Park p K 1 2 3 4 5 Total p K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total P K 1 2 3 4 5 Total p 9 2 4 3 8 7 9 33 0 7 3 4 12 15 15 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 1 9 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 8 0 20 2 5 8 14 19 21 69 0 7 11 5 18 15 24 0 80 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 9 0 26 8 3 13 11 10 25 70 0 3 4 22 11 23 34 97 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 8 0 1 2 3 5 3 0 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 23 7 II 14 24 3 30 89 1 15 14 16 16 16 32 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 5 1 4 5 20 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 6 0 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 58 of 58 cc c Little Rock School District c Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 c cc Franklin Fulbright Geyer Springs Grade Level K 1 2 3 4 5 Total p K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total P K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total p 2000-01 0 5 0 0 I 1 7 0 0 0 8 6 1 11 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2001-02 0 3 1 4 1 2 II 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-03 2 2 2 2 12 0 20 0 1 2 2 2 0 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2003-04 1 0 0 5 1 13 0 6 6 6 8 1 4 32 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 6 3 2004-05 0 0 2 2 2 0 6 1 3 5 3 3 1 9 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 c CC CCcc CCC c ccC CC C CC  K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Gibbs K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Jefferson p 1 0 2 10 5 c 10 2 1 9 6 30 1 3 5 9 6 3 27 0 16 2 5 0 10 33 0 0 1 5 15 9 36 0 4 3 2 5 10 26 2 0 2 6 2 2 19 0 9 9 10 15 13 69 0 0 0 3 6 8 17 0 9 1 5 3 10 34 1 0 1 0 3 10 15 0 C QCcc QCCc c C K 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 c CCC 1 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 59 of 59 3 -5 King Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 1 3 4 5 EE Total P K 1 2 3 4 5 Total 2000-01 1 3 8 1 18 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 7 Mabelvale P 2 K 1 1 1 2 6 3 4 4 4 5 (\u0026gt; EE Total 30 McDermott P 0 K 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 4 4 5 0 Total 6 Meadowcliff p 0 K 0 1 2 3 4 5 Total Mitchell P 0 0 1 10 14 25 1 2001-02 r 0 2002-03 1 2003-04 0 2004-05 2 14 2 9 0 29 0 1 2 1 5 0 0 15 0 3 3 3 3 3 17 0 32 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 12 18 I 1 3 4 0 9 1 1 8 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 4 6 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 6 5 3 3 6 1 24 0 2 1 4 8 0 1 1 5 2 1 0 10 0 0 6 1 1 3 6 17 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 8 0 7 1 19 12 3 0 43 I 1 4 0 7 0 1 0 0 7 5 I 15 2 9 0 3 0 9 10 33 0 0 4 3 6 5 8 26 0 7 1 0 4 2 2 21 0 5 1 1 1 K 3 8 3 1 3 2 1 3 3 6 8 2 5Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 60 of 60 c c c Little Rock School District c Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 c c c Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 EE Total Otter Creek Total 15 41 12 15 46 33 20 20 20 13 20 18 15 46 70 C 3 8 6 2 7 c 4 5 P K 1 1 3 4 5 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 5 4 4 3 0 3 6 0 0 1 5 5 1 0 8 5 6 1 6 2 1 0 5 5 9 c c c c c c c c Pulaski 0 0 0 p Heights c 1 0 0 1 0 K 1 1 3 0 1 11 2 0 2 0 3 5 3 0 1 1 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 4  c C c Total 29 Rightsell 19 II Total Rockefeller Total 13 18 Romine 13 19 13 14 26 81 35 13 12 10 10 59 15 22 43 23 16 16 127 c: c: c: c: c: c? c: c- c\n5 0 2 p 0 K 0 1 2 3 4 5 p K 1 1 3 4 5 p K 1 2 3 4 3 1 0 0 3 8 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 4 0 1 3 2 4 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 8 5 0 1 8 1 3 0 0 3 3 0 9 0 1 5 6 4 8 0 9 5 0 0 1 5 1 4 6 0 0 4 6 1 2 2 0 7 0 0 4 0 7 2 c c c c c c c c c C C c c I1  Little Rock School District Por^'olio Page 61 of 61 .1 1 Little Rock School District   Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level  2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 5 1 1 5 9 7 EE 0 2 Total 4 7 17 20 20 Stephens P 0 K 2 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total Terry P K 1 1 3 4 5 Total Wakefield P K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Washington P K 1 2 3 4 5 EE 2 15 15 7 43 \"o 4 4 1 1 1 15 22 0 0 2 0 o 3 1 6 1 0 I 1 5 1 (, Washington Watson Total P K 1 1 3 15 0 q 1 2 2 y 3 9 2 1 5 15 10 \"o 51 T 5 T Io 4 7 4 33 0 o' 0 2 0 1 9 0 0 1 2 2 q 0 7 0 0 4 0 2 2 6 8 15 4 16 1 58 o 4 4 6 9 4 10 37 3 1 0 0 1 6 11 'o' 0 y 0 0 y 4 1 Io 0 2 1 y 0 1 5 8 14 1 27 7 (\u0026gt;9 T 4 9 4 1 8 1 29 0 o 1 1 7 '9 18 0 3 0 5 q 0 5 13 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 18 1 14 6 ()2 1 14 20 14 15 T 17 89 0 1 y 1 1 4 1 20 3 2 4 15 11 10 47 0 1 0 1 I. 0 0 1 6 4Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 62 of 62 Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-0S Western Hills Williams Wilson 5 0 2 2 1 0 Total P K 1 2 3 4 5 Total K 1 1 3 4 5 Total P K 1 2 3 4 5 EE Total 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 4 4 2 6 13 10 44 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 6 14 0 0 4 1 9 2 5 27 0 3 2 1 3 4 13 0 3 0 8 1 9 1 0 22 8 0 2 10 4 5 3 6 30 1 0 0 5 2 2 10 0 1 0 1 1 10 6 0 19 4 0 3 4 2 3 10 5 27 1 2 4 1 0 2 10 0 2 3 1 0 3 2 11 5 0 8 1 3 7 8 4 32 1 5 4 5 3 8 27 0 0 0 1 0 3 6 10  Woodruff p K 1 2 3 4 5 Total LRSD-R 3 LRSD-R 4 5 Total Total P 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 4 22 21 23 66 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 12 19 24 55 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 11 c c C' c c\nc\nc\nc. c: c: c: c. c\nc\nc\nc\nc c C C C c C C c c c c c C Elementary School K 1 2 3 38 58 61 83 105 50 65 106 20 90 119 127 71 148 107 162 115 149 158 212 c c c  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 63 of 63 5     \"5 1 Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 I 2004-05 4 5 EE Total Middle Mann Dunbar Forest Heights Pulaski Heights Southwest Henderson Cloverdale Mabelvale 6 7 8 Total 6 7 8 Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 6 7 8 SM Total 131 141 536 13 42 45 100 128 68 100 296 146 127 108 381 126 137 121 384 91 114 97 302 95 70 64 229 201 204 111 516 98 72 76 246 136 187 6 674 46 75 65 186 112 94 77 283 152 144 107 16 419 111 122 89 3 325 136 91 75 9 311 81 146 81 30 338 129 109 115 I 354 123 142 53 9 327 135 215 8 769 67 107 86 260 no 69 68 247 168 154 102 12 436 107 121 120 4 352 137 132 93 21 383 118 127 102 12 359 129 144 144 2 419 115 157 125 0 397 185 220 879 56 91 100 247 117 101 50 268 133 95 105 333 100 106 122 328 95 no 89 294 92 123 125 340 93 157 136 386 85 167 113 365 170 275 1,080 67 92 236 94 118 78 290 94 79 84 257 68 120 57 245 96 125 120 341 106 no 94 310 104 72 113 289 129 105 126 360Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 64 of 64 Garland Total Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06 Grade Level 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SM Total 6 2000-01 6 19 25 31 21 8 4 114 904 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Middle School 7 8 9 10 11 12 SM Total ACC Hi^l\u0026lt; 9 10 11 12 Total Central 9 10 24 45 65 66 29 16 5 0 250 914 8 1 28 67 38 56 40 9 218 959 26 40 97 31 12 2 209 772 48 78 192 63 47 9 465 786 853 747 31 21 8 4 2,568 3 5 2 1 11 213 64 968 727 66 29 16 5 68 2,793 3 6 4 3 16 174 85  Fair Hall Metro 11 12 SS Total 9 10 11 12 ss Total 9 10 11 12 SS Total 9 4 26 307 124 74 89 30 317 431 222 104 73 830 49 8 316 182 158 53 40 8 441 212 219 150 47 1 629 c c c c c c c c C C c c C C 1,078 878 56 40 9 51 3,071 1 2 11 4 18 270 112 54 35 1 472 183 141 99 17 12 452 311 177 168 75 4 735 0 976 880 97 31 12 2 2,770 0 0 1 5 6 222 141 97 38 498 214 175 81 34 504 333 219 127 104 783 869 827 192 63 47 9 2,793 0 0 1 1 2 222 116 51 51 440 181 147 75 50 453 416 191 134 52 793 C c c C c C c C C c C C c c C C c c c C C C C c c Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 65 of 65 1  Little Rock School District Number of Student Discipline Referrals by School and Grade Level 2000-01 through 2005-06    McClellan Parkview Total High School Grade Level 10 11 12 Total 10 11 12 SS Total 10 11 12 Total 10 II 12 SS Total 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 238 173 52 31 494 12 25 27 20 84 1,021 563 278 181 2,043 118 164 63 30 376 33 34 11 83 722 637 353 139 10 1,861 186 162 47 37 435 11 32 15 33 91 962 626 394 201 20 2,203 338 130 116 48 632 25 19 22 27 93 1,132 684 444 256 2,516 173 161 78 57 469 59 42 26 30 157 1,051 657 365 241 2,314 0 0 0 9 9 9 1 3 5 0 0 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 66 of 66 CCcc Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06 School Elementary Suspension ___IiE___ Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 C Cccc c c 1 0 5 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 5 3 1 0 10 1 1 Short Term 4 0 4 7 12 3 c S 2 6 7 9 9 C K 0 2 3 0 0 c  Total 19 29 23 19 Booker Long Term Total Bale Expulsion Total 13 12 Short Term EE Total 15 20 25 24 23 Long Term C C CC c Q EE Total Expulsion C C C C C 3 1 2 3 4 5 K 1 2 3 4 5 K 1 2 3 4 5 K P 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 3 0 7 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 4 5 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 c Cccc ccc c c cc c Q C c 7)  Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 67 of 67   )  Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06     School Suspension Type___ Grade Level 4 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 EE Total Short Term EE Total 20 17 15 Brady Long Term EE Total Badgett Expulsion EE Total Short Term Total Long Term 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K P 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K P 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 3 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 2 0 5 1 0 1 4 2 1 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 3 0 3 1 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 68 of 68 c Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06 cc School Suspension ___IlEe___ Grade Level 4 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 0 0 cc 5 0 0 K 0 0 c p 0 Total 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Expulsion Total McDermott Carver Short Term Long Term Expulsion Short Term Total Total Total 14 19 18 13 10 10 25 25 II 14 22 25 Total II 33 66 69 82 5 0 0 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 I 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 8 7 9 2 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 2 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 3 3 6 5 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 cccc C C C cccc c cc cc ccccLcCc c CC cccc   Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 69 of 69   3  Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06 School Suspension Type___ Grade Level 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Long Term Total Expulsion '-1 Total Baseline Fair Park Short Term Long Term Expulsion Short Term EE Total EE Total EE Total 10 13    71 \"1 1 3 4 s K 1 2 3 4 5 K 1 2 3 4 5 K P 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 0 9 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 8 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 i 3 3 0 0 1 1c Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 70 of 70 c Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06 cc c School Suspension Type Grade Level 4 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 0 1 2 0 2 ccc c 5 0 6 4 2 3 K 0 0 0 2 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 8 9 4 6 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc cCc c Long Term Expulsion Total Total Forest Park Short Term 12 Total 19 13 Long Term Total c c c c Expulsion c c c c 5 0 0 0 0 0 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K P 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc ccc c C cccc c cc c cc   Little Rock School District Portfolio Page 71 of 71    Little Rock School District Type and Number of Student Suspensions by School and Grade Level 2000-01 to 2005-06  School Suspension ___TjE?___ Grade Level Total 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 i -J Short Term 11 EE 'i Franklin Long Term Expulsion Total EE Total EE Total 27 12 26 24 Gibbs Short Term 15 10 Total 27 36 17 16 15 Long Term Total Expulsion     1 1 3 4 5 K P 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K p 1 2 3 4 5 K 1 2 3 4 S K 1 0 0 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 9 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 2 7 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 5 2 3 5 0 0 1 3 0 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eBrooks, Roy G.\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1063","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School boards","School board members","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1063"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["56 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda C DEC 1 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION 1110NITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting Happy Holidays! 2 0~ .\u0026gt; :mc ,- ,- r- - -1:I: Oz o\u0026gt; :c :c c-\u0026lt; m-.. :c C: -z\n,aO 0 .... ,- 0 r-z (\")(/) \u0026gt; F\nJC \u0026gt;m \"'c3 C:\nJC ~ .... :-\u0026lt;5!? o:c ~m \u0026gt;C') .... 8 Oz z~ \"'o z (/) !D C') 0~ . N ,-m\ncZ n.... \":c' \u0026gt;m f\n:c ::0: (/) :\u0026lt; :c m\n\u0026gt; c3 a,\nc o--\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\"' :ec n- :1:0 m:I: :I: :I: a, C: m~ :c C') (/).\u0026gt;... 0 z (/) I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS December 16, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Rockefeller Show Choir Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: V. A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Discussion: Internal Auditor H. Discussion: Appointment of Staff for Monitoring Legislative Session/ Governmental Affairs Liaison I. Discussion: Port TIF APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting: 11-16-04 ,... c-,-., \u0026gt;.\nmD r- rr- - ....,\ni: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\nDC: -z\nD (\") o ..... r- c5 r- z (\")Cl\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F :\u0026lt; :,::, m\n,,,~ a,\nD 0-4 \u0026gt; en :,::,on ~i ~~ m~\nD (\") en.\u0026gt;.... c5 z (I) Regular Board Meeting December 16, 2004 Page2 VI. CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION A. Quarterly Update with Revised Regulation IL-R B. Elementary Reading/ Language Arts Textbook Adoption C. Proposed Changes to Middle / High School Curriculum Programs VII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Mitchell Elementary School B. Fair Park Elementary School C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Goal Setting/ Process for Superintendent's Evaluation XII. ADJOURNMENT n\"tl \u0026gt;.. -:,.:.m0.. ,.... _ _,\ni: Oz o\u0026gt; El~ m-..\n,:, C: -z ::,:,n ,o....\" i\"5' r-z nu, ~ I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/PERFORMANCE 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. CITIZENS REMARKS C. LR CTA IV. REPORTS/ COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: December 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Please note in this month's report the number of school projects that have been moved from \"Under Construction\" to \"Completed\". The completed projects are at Brady, Dunbar, Parkview, Pulaski Heights and Southwest. You may still see workmen at these schools performing \"Punch List\" items, but students and staff occupy the new and remodeled areas. Our plan is to have an addition to Forest Heights Middle School under construction during the spring of 2005, along with roof replacements for the gymnasium and an older classroom building. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer p z .m.... c_\n\u0026gt;:]Cl) zn ,.. C: r-CJ\u0026gt; ~~ CZ =l I 0\n\u0026gt;:l ,.... c3~\n,:,(\") ..... C: -_-,CvJ\u0026gt;, ..,0 z !\"\" 2 rT :x ,2, r,, C s: C\n, :,, ..... m (\") ::i:: z 0,.. .. 8 -\u0026lt; .C.,: C ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I 1 1:::st. Lompletion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Central Renovation - Interior __ __ ~ $10,200,266 Aug-05 Fair Park Roof ___ _ ___ $245,784 I Jan-05 Henderson I Lockers ________ $43,854 Dec-04 Scott Field Track Renovations ____ I $289,056 I Dec-04 Wakefield I Rebuild I $5,300,000 Dec-04 Wilson 1HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2004-05 I I I !::st. c.\nomplellOn Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver I Media Center Expansion $167,490 I Unknown Forest Heights Remodel 1 $1,547,000 Unknown Gibbs !Addition 1 $705,670 I Jiin-05 Meadowcliff IRemodel _____ I $164,150 . Mar-05 Mitchell !Renovation ___ I $2,212,493 1 Unknown Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED I I I t:Sl. vompletlon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade ___ _ Unknown I Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgr~ _ Unknown I Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition __ $520,750 _ Unknown Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Garland Pulaski Hgts. MS Rightsell Western Hills Woodruff ~model Unknown Unknown Energy monitoring system installation Unkno~ Unknown Renovation - $2,494,000 _j_ _ Unknown I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC - $640,000 Aug-05 Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badgett Badgett Bale Bale Bale Bale Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Brady I I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Fire alarm _ - $32,350 Aug-03 HVAC $70,000 Nov-04 Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Energy efficient lighting _ $82,000 Partial asbestos abatement _ $237,237 Fire alarm _ $18,250 Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 -Energy monitoring system Partial roof replacement HVAC Renovation Gym Roof ADA Rest rooms Energy efficient lighting Energy monitoring system installation Asbestos abatement Flre alarm Addition/renovation Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement + $269,587 $664,587 $953,520 $48,525 $25,000 $170,295 $23,710 $10,900 $34,501 $973,621 $80,593 $345,072 Dec-01 - Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Oct-04 Aug-04 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Nov-04 Sep-02 Auq-02 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01 Carver Parking lot 1 $111,742 1 Aug-03 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area 1 $225,000 Dec-04 Central ,Reflecting Pond $57,561 i Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking 1 $174,000 Aug-03 Cc-e-_n_tr_a_l/-Q_u_i_g,,~le--y\"_ ___~ Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrica_l re__p,__a_ir_ _____ $:c2.::-6=--5=-'-0\",-=0--0=----'------'A---'-u.:...g,,_--0-'---3'--- l Central/Quigley IAthletic Field Improvement $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Irrigation System $14,500 1 Aug-03 Central Purchase land for school I Unknown Dec-02 Central I Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 , Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair , $24,000 i Oct-01 t-:C=--e-_n--t,-r_a.,I.. .________F~ ir_e_A-,-l-ar_m_ S-y'--s-,--t_em_D_e_s_i\ng\"-n_/_ln_s_ta_ll_atio_n_ __,! ___$' --8_0--,'-8_7_6--i-l __ Aug-01 Central Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 Chicot Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Chicot Sound Attenuation $43, 134 Jul-04 1C-_lo_v_e_rd_a_le_E_le_m_._ ___- -l-E-''n--e=-_rg,,.,y__e=f-f ic ::..i..e.::..n:.c.t.:..cl.i..,g,,_'h-'-t'-i'-n.:g\n'---------- ~, ___$_ 1_32,~6_78-+1-- __J_ ul-01 Cloverdale MS IEnergy efficient lighting $189,743 _J_u_l-_0_1 t=C,-l-o_v,..e.,_rd_a_le_M_S_ _____M_ a_,j_o_r_r_eno_v_a_ti_on_\u0026amp;_a_d_d_it_io_n_ ____. ..._ __ $c._1.,,3_9_3.,,_8_2_2_1..._ Nov-02 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade ,____ ___ $:_9,2_0_0--'-_ _ Oct-04 Dodd Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Aug-01 Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile - - _ - $156,299 __ Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC _ $215,5_7_0 __ ~ -02 t=D,--u_n_ba_r ________ Renovation/addition _ $6, 149,0_2_3~-- Nov-04 Facilities Serv_ic_e_ ____ln te_ri_or re_n_ova_t_io_n____ __ _ $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services Fire alarm $12,000 Aug-03 Fair Park I HVAC renovation/fire alarm - _ - ~ 15,956 _ Apr-02 FairPark Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Aug-01 Fair P_a_rk_ _______A_ sbestos abatement-ceiling - $59,310~ Aug-01 J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition ------+E_n_e_rg, y efficient lighting Press box J. A. Fai_r ________ S_e_c-ur-ity - cameras J. A. Fair +Athletic Field Improvement - J. A. Fair Irrigation System ---- J. A. Fair __J3_oof repairs ____ _ Forest Park - Replace window units w/central HVAC Forest Park ___ -=_ ~ Diagonal parking-- Forest Park _ Energy efficient lighting Fulbright Energy efficient lighting Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units Fulbright Parking lot -- Fulbright Roof repairs Franklin Renovation Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs Hall Hall Hall Hall Roof Repair Energy efficient lighting Energy monitoring system installation Major renovation \u0026amp; addition Asbestos abatement Energy efficient lighting Energy efficient lighting $3,155,640 $277,594 $10,784 $12_,500 $38,000 $14,000 $391 ,871 $485,258 $111,742 $119,788 $134,463 $11 ,950 $107,835 $140,000 $200,000 $2,511 ,736 $161 ,752 $76,447 $11 ,770 $8,637,709 $168,222 $42,931 $296,707 Aug-04 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-03 May-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Jun-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aor-01 2 z -m\u0026lt;_c\na en zn )\u0026gt;C r- en \u0026gt;c!o!! CZ =I I 0\n:a ~!2 ocn\n:an -4 C _, en -CJ\u0026gt; ..,0 z :-,, m-\u0026lt; n ::c z 0 8 -\u0026lt; C ~ C ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 1 Aug-01 Hall ' Intercom I I Feb-01 Hall Security cameras $1Q,6QQ I Jun-01 - Henderson Energy efficient lighting $193,679 Jul-01 Henderson _Boot replacement gym $107,835 i May-01 Henderson - I Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 I Aug_:Q_!_ !Asbestos abatement Phase 2 - Henderson $250,000 Aug-02 --- IRC Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 I Oct-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw  Parking lot L $269,588 Jul-01 Mablevale Elem Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Oct-04 Mabelvale Elem. I Energy monitoring system installation -r $12,150 I Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. ___ ~lace HVAC units -+ $300,000 Aug-02 - Mabelvale Elem. - A sbestos Abatement $107,000 I Aug-02 -- Mabelvale Elem.  Energy efficient lighting I $106,598 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-01 Mabelvale MS I Renovation $6,851,621 Mar-04 Mann 1 Partial Replacement --i-- $11,500,000 Apr-04 Mann !Asphalt walks -, Dec-01 Mann The total $1.8 million Dec-01 -- Walkway canopies ----- . is what has been Mann I Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 Mann Fencing -- projects listed __S ~-01 Mann - Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan ~letic Field Improvement - $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System $14,750 Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras _ ~ $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan Energy efficient lighting $303,614 May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 --- - Intercom_ __ 1 McClellan $46,000 Feb-02 -- - $~55,622 C ---- McClellan Classroom Addition Jul-04 --- -- ----- -- McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 . Sep-04 -- - - ~ McDermott Energy efficient lighting ~9,411 Feb-01 Replace roof top HVAC units - - -- ~ - McDermott - - $476,000 Aug-02 ~ Meadowcliff Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 ~ Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 ~ Aug-02 Meadow-cliff - - Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 - Metropolitan Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell Building Remediation $165,000 Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Asbestos abatement $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek -Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD DECEMBER 16, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED l Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Parkview Addition $2,121,226 Dec-04 Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 I Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 I Sep-01 Parkview Exterior lights , $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 Aug-01 Parkview Locker replacement 1 $120,000 Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 : Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 I Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1, 193,259 Nov-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 ' Nov-04 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 , Apr-01 Rockefeller I Energy efficient lighting $137,004 I Mar-01 Rockefeller 'Replace rooftop HVAC $539,175 1 Aug-01 Rockefeller , Parking addition $111,742 Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Apr-02 Romine 1Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 Security/Transportation I Bus cameras I $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest Addition 1 $2,000,000 I Nov-04 Southwest I Asbestos abatement $28, ~ Aug-00 Southwest New roof ---------+- $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting I - $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest Drainage / street widening -- ---+--- ~o.ooo Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installatio_n_-+- $4,830 - - Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm - --,--- $9,0~ - Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation __ $275,000 - Dec-01 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation !Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data - ___ ---,.- Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting --___ .....___ $73,8~ - Feb-01 Terry ____ Driveway \u0026amp; Parking ,____ $83,484 Aug-02 Terry 'Media Center additi~ _-_-_ -_-_-_-_-___ $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield __ Security cameras __ _ _ _.,__ $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield__ Energy efficient lighting __ $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield ___ Demolition/Asbestos Abatement .___ $200,000 _ Nov-02 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Oct-04 Washington ~ ~ Security cameras - $7,900 -_ Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson _ Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson _ Energy efficient lighting _ $106,868 _ _ Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation $2,106,492. Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions _ $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Auq-02 4 z ~5!\na\"' ZC'l \u0026gt;c: r-u, \u0026gt;c:!!o! CZ ~ I\na ~~\na C\") .... C: _.en .-.\",0' z .7..1. m C\") :c z 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: \"C ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker z ~2 ~!!l )\u0026gt;,C:: ,-v, \u0026gt;!!! c::o CZ a\no ,- m :::c C). inc ...,-!!l ~~ CJ) ,- c5 \u0026gt;ig z z ~~\non --,c:: --,CJ\u0026gt; .-.C, Jc\u0026gt;5 z .'..T..i m n :::c z 0,- 8 -\u0026lt; c:: ~ m Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS December 16, 2004 To: Board of Directors (~---- From: ~Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - December This is the sixty-second communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - December 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. f) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. g) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year were: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). A narrative report is attached for Sharefest 2004. d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. z -m\u0026lt;_c z\n,:, nen \u0026gt;c r- en c\u0026gt;!o!? cz ~ I 0 \"' r-m ::c C) . enc .... -~ ~~en \u0026gt;r- zc5 c:\n. 0 z .,,2 oen\n,\n,n ..\nC --\u0026lt;e enn ..., c5 z .'..'.\". m n :r: z 0 8 -\u0026lt; .C, , C ~ m Between fifteen hundred and two thousand Sharefest 2004 volunteers partnered with eleven Little Rock School District schools. We gratefully acknowledge their hard work and assistance in building stronger community ties and providing assistance to the students and staff of the Little Rock School District. At Southwest Middle School volunteers from Fellowship Bible Church - landscaped. front beds with plants and mulch, painted student playground, cleared park area for outdoor classroom and park, installed picnic tables in park area, installed 1600 ceiling tiles in all hallways, four wall murals were painted, painted the parent center, painted inspirational words in gym, provided large amount of school supplies for students. There is an ongoing relationship including tutoring, student sponsorship, mentoring throughout the year. At Otter Creek Elementary volunteers from Geyer Springs First Baptist Church: painted the small student restrooms in the classrooms, painted the lounge and the restrooms in the lounge, built a box to house the sound system in the cafeteria, created 3 sidewalks around the new wing, landscaped - trimmed and added mulch, and built a table that will collapse in the lounge. Volunteers from Hunter United Methodist Church re-landscaped the main flower bed of Romine Elementary School. Second Baptist - John Barrow volunteered at Henderson Middle School. With persons from the PT A and staff they created a new landscape bed in front of the Henderson Memorial, planted new plants all planting beds, re-mulched all flower beds, painted all railings and posts, painted a new crosswalk to the athletic field, painted all of the picnic tables for student and staff use, and re-did the bulletin board in the assistant principal hallway. At the Alternative Center, the front doors in the Main building were painted, all hallway doors in the Main building was painted along with Cubicles in several rooms were painted. The men of St. Mark Baptist Church have committed to come back once a month to do detailed projects for the ALC. Cloverdale Middle School's partner was Second Baptist - John Barrow. They re-painted the large area map of Arkansas on the front parking lot, mulched the landscape beds, improved the drainage in the front of the building to allow water to drain better, and spread three loads of compost onto the low areas in the front of the school. At Franklin Elementary, volunteers from Fellowship Bible Church painted a mural all around the auditorium. The stage was repainted. The teachers lounge was made over (added counter top, new furniture, appliances, pictures, lamps, new curtains, and painted). They added an outdoor classroom on the south side of the building, they painted the outside concrete wall and added the school name and mascot to the wall, they planted trees, created new flower beds, added seating benches around the school outside, built bookshelves for classrooms, mulched areas with wood chips, installed soccer goals in the back of the school, they painted a new entrance mural (the falcon) at the entrance of the building. Fellowship Bible has officially partnered with the Franklin School and the surrounding community. At J.A. Fair Magnet High School volunteers from Geyer Springs First Baptist Church, staff members, and community volunteers build planting beds with landscape timbers, and improved the front part of the school by installing the small bridge, and moving and spreading approximately twelve tons of compost and top soil to create a new plant environment. Dunbar Magnet Middle School's partner was Fellowship Bible Church. The following projects were completed at Dunbar: Thirty-seven (37) plus whiteboards were installed, team names and logos painted in assigned areas, character names and phrases painted, the office was painted, office curtains installed and hung, auditorium seats fixed and oiled, library shelves built, 55 gallon trash cans painted, landscaping projects completed were a) holly bushes pulled, b). hardwood mulch, c) pea gravel, d) bushes planted, e) flowers planted, f) potting soil distributed, the library books were organized and pictures hung up, character education and international banners were hung up, two trophy cases were built and installed, an oak tree was trimmed, and a bobcat mural was painted. Mabelvale Magnet Middle School had as a returning partner Geyer Springs First Baptist Church. The projects undertaken by the volunteers were: building picnic tables (12), painting classroom doors (6), replacing and planting additional shrubbery, pruning the shrubbery at the front of the gymnasium, raking and cleaning existing flower beds, painting the concession area in the gymnasium, building and staining bookcases (18), general cleanup, and hanging three murals created by the art students as a tribute to Mabelvale Magnet Middle School. The Adult Education Center's partner was Fellowship Bible Church. Volunteers from Fellowship painted five classrooms to include bookshelves and trim, the library, hallways, the assistant principal's office, three bathrooms, and the outside doors. Also painted was a beautiful mural at entrance of the auditorium. They refinished the wood banisters on the stairwell, spread gravel on a muddy driveway, put woodchips around Head Start play ground, painted the teachers lounge, installed new blinds in the teachers lounge, replaced furniture in the teachers lounge, put two concrete benches on the campus, and are working on a outside sign for the building. The library is being recarpeted by Facilities to complete the library project. General partners with the ShareFest 2004 project was the City of Little Rock which provided free mulch and compost for the various sites and the Little Rock School District Facilities Department which provided paint, paint supplies, and delivery for the donated mulch and compost from the City of Little Rock, for wood chips from a lumber mill, and topsoi I from a nursery. p z ~2 ~~ \u0026gt; C: r-u, \u0026gt;!!! c:o oz a' ::0 r-m ::c C') . se\nn:c.... ~ ~~ (/) r- c5 \u0026gt;en z 0z \"V 52 QUI\n:on .... C: --1U\"I' -nc5 z :..n.. m (') :z:c 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: \"V ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Installation of the Safari media retrieval system at Wakefield Elementary was completed. Staff attended the initial training sessions during the week of November 29 and immediately began to use the system. Additional training will be scheduled that emphasizes integration of the system into classroom instruction. Training begins January 10 for Watson Elementary.  Training for teachers at Parkview in using Edline for parent access to grades will begin in January. Core district staff will receive training the week of December 13.  E-rate filing season opened on December 15. This year we plan to file for telecommunications services and network electronics.  Mr. Sandy Becker has been working with Cloverdale Middle School to pilot a program to allow students to take home older computers that have been taken off the LRSD network but still have some educational value. He will be available if there are questions about this project. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services z ~5!\n:o rn zn ,. C: l\"'\"(J) ,. !!! c:o oz =I I 0\n:o \"ti !2 om\n:on _, C: _, (J) -..r,n0 z .,,. C: ,\"0_. ', m\n,:, m C) C: ~ 0z\n=\n, DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Quarterly Update Report with Revised Regulation IL-R BACKGROUND: A quarterly written update by the Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department was completed in accordance with the District Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). This report includes an expanded evaluation agenda (revised IL-R), descriptions of four program step-two evaluations to be completed this school year, and resumes of two external evaluators available to conduct the step-two evaluations. RATIONALE: We must broaden our Program Evaluation Agenda and perform step-two evaluations to comply with Judge Wilson's order and to accommodate changes in responsibilities in carrying out evaluation activities. FUNDING: No additional funding requirements. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the Quarterly Update Report and approve the revised regulation ILR. r\u0026gt; n C: n~ C,...:. C: :I: n ::c ?\nG') m \"'\n,,,~ :I:,=. a:, nc: :m:c\"z' rm ,-Cl) mCJ\u0026gt; ,-Cl) mm [I:~ n m DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Adoption BACKGROUND: The Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Selection Committee of the Little Rock School District has completed the textbook selection process as outlined in the Board of Education's Policies and Regulations manual. The committee participated in the District's textbook caravan and other informal meetings, including a one-day study session, to be able to make a quality recommendation to the Board. Textbook samples were also available in the Elementary Schools and at the IRC for review by teachers and principals. RATIONALE: As a result of the process, the committee recommends that the Board authorize purchase of the Houghton-Mifflin Reading Series as the textbook of choice for the Little Rock School District Elementary (K-5) Reading/Language Arts program. The Houghton Mifflin Reading/Language Arts Textbook was selected for, but not limited to, the following reasons:  Quality of literature included in the student anthology  Organization of the instructional materials  Alignment of instruction with the District's Literacy Plan  Alignment of scope and sequence with the Arkansas State Standards and Framework The textbooks will be made available for review by the Board upon the request of the Board. Once the Board has approved the selection, the textbooks will be available for review by the general public in the VIPS office or in Room 1 of the IRC.  fl n C: ~ n C....:. C: 31: n ::r:: ~ C) m \"' ?-\n:i 31: :~ a, nc: m::r::z\"' i= rn men ..... \"' mm ~~ n m ~ .., \"\ni \"[ \"\nt\n, ,n. n ~ It was the textbook committee's charge to intensely study the various reading/language arts textbook samples and to make a quality, informed decision. In all of my years of working with committees, this committee was by far the most professional and most committed to the process to ensure a quality decision. A list of the committee members will be made available upon request. FUNDING: Textbook funding is provided by the District and by the State. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept the recommendation of the Elementary Reading/Language Arts Textbook Selection Committee. PREPARED BY: Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Proposed Changes in the Middle and High School Curriculum Programs for 2005-2006 BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Board Policy IG, Curriculum Development, Adoption, and Review, and Board Policy IGA, Curriculum Program Alignment and Coherence, all curricular revisions are to be approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: In response to the diverse needs of our students as well as our commitment to continuous cultivation of their growth, new courses were developed and current course descriptions and assignment levels were amended. Furthermore, upon review of our Middle and High School Curriculum Programs, it was deduced that courses were being offered year-after-year in which students were not enrolled. Consequently, due to a lack of enrollment or program termination such courses are slated to be deleted. MIDDLE SCHOOL A summary of the proposed middle school curriculum changes for the 2005-2006 school year are as follows: Business Education 1. Delete Exploratory Multimedia - duplication of course numbers 2. Delete Introductory Economics - continued lack of enrollment 3. Delete Real World Economics - continued lack of enrollment 4. Delete International Economics and the World of Business - continued lack of enrollment Career \u0026amp; Technical 5. Add Environmental and Spatial Technology (EAST Lab - 6th graders)\n,,,~ s: := l a, .-,c: ::c (J) mz I= ~ mv, .... (J) mm ~~ ,n,, English 6. Delete 7. Delete 8. Delete Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop 7 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Reading \u0026amp; Writing Workshop 8 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Foreign Languages 9. Delete Exploratory Foreign Language \u0026amp; Culture - grades 7 \u0026amp; 8 (offered only at grade 6) 10. Delete 11. Change 12.Change 13. Change 14. Change Math 15. Delete 16. Delete 17. Delete 18. Delete 19. Delete 20. Delete 21. Delete 22. Delete Science 23. Delete 24. Delete 25. Delete 26. Delete 27. Delete 28. Delete 29. Delete 30. Delete Exploratory German - continued lack of enrollment French I Grade 8 - using high school course number Spanish I Grade 8 - using high school course number German I Grade 8 - using high school course number Latin I Grade 8 - using high school course number Mathematics 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Mathematics 6 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists International Money Grade 7 - continued lack of enrollment International Money Grade 7 \u0026amp; 8 - continued lack of enrollment Mathematics 7 (Alt Prog-double block) - program no longer exists Mathematics 7 - (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Geometry Pre-AP - not offered in middle school any longer Mathematics 8 (Alt Prog)- program no longer exists Science 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Scientific Illustration - continued lack of enrollment Technical Writing - continued lack of enrollment Science 7 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Seminar in Health Science - continued lack of enrollment Health Science I - continued lack of enrollment Seminar in Health Science - continued lack of enrollment Science 8 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Social Studies 31 . Delete Exploring the Teaching Profession - course no longer offered due to lack of enrollment 32. Delete 33. Delete 34. Delete 35. Delete 36. Delete 37. Delete Social Studies 6 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Economics 11 - continued lack of enrollment Amateur Radio - continued lack of enrollment International Economics and the World of Business - lack of enrollment Social Studies 7 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Social Studies 8 (Alt Prog) - program no longer exists Special Education 38. Delete Mathematics 6 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 39. Delete Mathematics 7 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 40. Delete Mathematics 8 Resource Room (two-period block) - lack of enrollment 41 . Add Directed Studies HIGH SCHOOL A summary of the proposed high school curriculum changes for the 2005-2006 school year are as follows: Art 1. Delete Pottery A \u0026amp; Pottery B - they were combined to make Pottery a full year course Business Education 2. Change Financial Planning course description to clarify course content 3. Change International Finance course description to clarify course content 4. Change Web Design and Animation course description to clarify course content 5. Change Securities and Insurance course description to clarify course 6. Delete 7. Delete 8. Delete 9. Change content and change grade levels to be taught Rapid Writing A - continued lack of enrollment Rapid Writing B - continued lack of enrollment Junior Executive Training - continued lack of enrollment Banking \u0026amp; Finance Operations to Banking \u0026amp; Finance Operations/Teller Training Career and Technical Education 10. Change Introduction to Engineering Design course description to clarify course content and change grade levels to be taught 11. Change Computer Integrated Manufacturing course description to clarify course content 12. Change Principles of Engineering course description to clarify course content and change grade levels to be taught 13. Change Economics and the World of Finance change grade levels to be taught 14. Change Introduction to Financial Services course description to clarify course content 15. Add 16. Delete 17. Delete 18. Add 19. Add Engineering (Project Lead the Way) (McClellan only} Introduction to Medical Professions Education - duplication of course number Salesmanship - continued lack of enrollment Engineering Design and Development (EDD) (Project Lead the Way) (McClellan only) Guide to Networks (J. A Fair only) r\u0026gt; C 0 z .... 0 z en .0.,. ,,\n,, 0 ~ 19\n,,,~ ii: ,= I a, nc: ::c!!! mz rremn m en r- en mm ~~ ,c,=.,\n!..l ):\ni \"t ):\n,\n, n,. n ~ English 20. Delete 21 . Delete 22. Delete 23. Delete 24. Delete 25. Delete 26. Delete 27. Delete 28. Delete 29. Delete 30. Delete Drama I International Studies - continued lack of enrollment English II Workshop (double block) - lack of enrollment English II Pre-AP Workshop (double block) - lack of enrollment Journalism II - replaced by Journalism II Newspaper 052404 or Journalism II Yearbook 052402 Journalism Ill - replaced by Journalism Ill Newspaper 053404 or Journalism Ill Yearbook 053402 Journalism IV - replaced by Journalism IV Newspaper 054404 or Journalism IV Yearbook 054402 English IV International Studies AP - continued lack of enrollment English I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English II Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English Ill Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place English IV Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Foreign Languages 31. Delete Spanish II (University Course) - continued lack of enrollment Mathematics 32. Add 33. Delete 34. Delete 35. Delete 36. Delete 37. Delete 38. Delete 39. Delete 40. Delete 41 . Delete Metropolitan 42. Add 43. Delete 44. Delete 45. Delete 46. Delete 47. Delete 48. Delete 49. Delete Music 50. Delete Science 51 . Change 52. Delete Transition to College Mathematics Calculator Applications - ADE failed to approve ACT Preparation: Mathematics - ADE failed to approve ESL Modeling Algebra I - no longer offered Modeling Algebra I Pre-AP - no longer offered ESL Algebra I Pre-AP - no longer offered Algebra II Pre-AP (double block)- no longer offered Algebra I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Algebra II Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Geometry Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place GIS Spatial Projects and Community Exchange (S.P.A.C.E.) Lab (Homeland Security and Economic Development) Machine Tools I - never reached minimum number of students to make class Industrial Technology Education - continued lack of enrollment Exploring Industrial Technology- continued lack of enrollment Residential Construction I - continued lack of enrollment Machine Tools II - never reached minimum number of students to make class Residential Construction II - continued lack of enrollment Residential Construction Ill - continued lack of enrollment Music of the Movies - class never made Physics 11 AP to Physics 11 AP-B Biology I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place 53. Delete 54. Delete Chemistry I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Physics I Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Social Studies 55. Delete Psychology (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack 56. Delete 57. Delete 58. Delete 59. Delete 60. Delete 61. Delete 62. Delete 63. Delete 64. Delete 65. Delete 66. Delete of enrollment Sociology (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Teacher Apprenticeship (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Service Learning (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Introduction to Education (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment Community Resources for Children and Families (TOT), course no longer offered due to continued lack of enrollment World Cultures, course no longer offered due to lack of enrollment Global Studies - continued lack of enrollment Economics - continued lack of enrollment Civics Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place World History Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place US History Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place Special Education 67. Add Directed Studies 68. Delete Reading I RR - continued lack of enrollment 69. Delete Communications IA RR - continued lack of enrollment 70. Delete Read I SC - continued lack of enrollment 71 . Delete Reading II RR - continued lack of enrollment 72. Delete Reading II SC- continued lack of enrollment 73. Delete Reading Ill RR- continued lack of enrollment 74. Delete Reading Ill SC- continued lack of enrollment 75. Delete Reading IV SC - continued lack of enrollment Non-Credit 76. Delete Plato Lab - Plato Lab Program no longer in place FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Instruction would like to recommend that the Board of Education approve these additions, deletions, and modifications to the middle school and high school curriculum programs for 2005-2006. PREPARED BY: Dr. Olivine Roberts p ..., z \u0026gt;z n ~\nr, m ~ ?-~ !I: := l a, nC :c !!? ,m- mz ,- (/) mcn ,- (/) mm ~~ n DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are considered intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources !.:.,I z \u0026gt;z (\") ~\n:r, m ~ ?\u0026lt; !\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ~~ \"llo 5!!! m-\u0026lt; cz , m\n:o :z:m ,\n:! ~ 2!!::o z:,c\nC) u, U\u0026gt;\n,-~\nc := la, nC :z:!!! mrmz r- U\u0026gt; mU\u0026gt; r- U\u0026gt; mm\nI:~ n Personnel Changes Page2 December 16, 2004 NAME START DATE/ SALARY POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Vinson, Willie Consulting Teacher/ 8-13-98 6-07 Reason: Accepted another CLOVERDALE ELEM 12-16-04 TCH925 position New Certified Employees Austin, Robert Chemistry/ 11-08-04 4-10 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Beard, William Social Studies/ 9-15-04 1-01 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Boyd, Debbye General Science/ 10-21-04 2-16 ALC TCH925 Bryant, Sharon Title I/ 10-19-04 6-16 HENDERSON TCH925 Ervin, Nickey Algebra I/ 11-8-04 4-09 J. A. FAIR TCH925 Hooper, Ruth Music/ 11-10-04 2-16 TERRY TCH925 FULBRIGHT Rybard , Aleta English/ 9-27-04 1-04 HENDERSON TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43500.00 43818.00 annual 29668.44 prorated 34575.00 annual 30253.13 prorated 47715.00 annual 35290.70 prorated 53898.00 annual 40423.50 prorated 42662.00 annual 28885.73 prorated 47717.00 annual 31811 .33 prorated 32350.00 annual 26958.33 prorated Personnel Changes Page3 December 16, 2004 NAME Sullivan, Martha Thomas, Homer Turner, Ressie POSITION/ SCHOOL 4 Yr Old/ RIGHTSELL Social Studies/ ALC English/ ALC Certified Promotion NONE Certified Transfer NONE START DATE/ END DATE 11-15-04 10-6-04 11-2-04 SALARY CLASS 1-16 TCH925 6-13 TCH925 2-02 TCH925 Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Burnett, Tarneisha Care/ 9-13-04 2-03 Reason: Resigned without CARE 11-01-04 CARE notice Carter, Noda Instructional Aide/ 4-05-02 33-11 Reason: Resigned without CHICOT 11-10-04 INA925 notice Geisler, Sherry Bookkeeper/ 10-12-98 45-15 Reason : Personal CHILD NUTRITION 12-1-04 AN12 ANNUAL SALARY 46215.00 annual 30087.89 prorated 50434.00 annual 40188.00 prorated 30617.00 annual 21368.11 prorated 7.85 per hour 13875.00 33528.00 fl C 0 ~ 0z tJ\u0026gt; ..0,. ,, ~ ~\n,o !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; r-\n,o m c3 .\n.,.o. ?\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; mn 1::,- -oo r- tJ\u0026gt; 0-\u0026lt; z- m c, m\n,o %m ~~ ~ ~ C, tJ\u0026gt; tJ\u0026gt;\n,,~ I:::= I 0:, nC %!!! mz r- m r- tJ\u0026gt; mtJ\u0026gt; r- tJ\u0026gt; mm I: :\n\u0026lt;,o \u0026lt;'i Personnel Changes Page4 December 16, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY NAME ANNUAL POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY New Non-Certified Employees Blackman, Margie Care/ 10-25-04 1-05 7.56 CARE CARE per hour Brewington, Kimberly Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-01 9481.00 TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual 6338.42 prorated Coakley, Kevin Instructional Aide/ 11-11-04 33-03 5795.02 CHICOT INA925 annual 3915.55 prorated Dickerson, Bobbie Care/ 11-08-04 1-07 7.89 CARE CARE per hour Faulkner, Janet Child Nutrition/ 11-01-04 3-01 9350.00 CHILD NUTRITION FSH550 annual 6786.29 prorated Glover, Jimmie Instructional Aide/ 10-29-04 33-03 10934.00 HENDERSON INA925 annual 7801 .56 prorated Gonzalez, Luis Security Officer/ 11 -1-04 36-16 18491 .00 HALL SOFR9 annual 13,106.26 prorated Hodrick, Marcia Child Nutrition/ 11 -18-04 16-01 14012.00 HALL FSMGRS annual 9193.06 prorated Khabeer, Renette Child Nutrition/ 11 -15-04 3-01 9350.00 ROMINE FSH550 annual 6384.14 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 December 16, 2004 ~ START C DATE/ 0 SALARY ANNUAL z .... NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY 0 z \"' .0. , \"'D ~ Logan. Ira Nurse/ 11-03-04 52-07 32544.00 ~ :,0 FRANKLIN NURSES annual 22543.50 prorated Maxwell, Marilyn Child Nutrition/ 11-09-04 3-01 9350.00 MCDERMOTT FSH550 annual !=' 6585.22 .., z prorated  z 0 \u0026gt; 9481 .00 ,... Montgomery, Timothy Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-01 :,0 m TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual ~ :,0 6338.42 .... prorated Morehead, Maudella Instructional Aide/ 11-22-04 33-03 10934.00 BOOKER INA925 annual ?\u0026lt; !i\u0026lt; 6974.12 mo !I:,... prorated \"\"Do ,-Cl\u0026gt; 0-\u0026lt; z-m Cl 5689.50 m:,o Ogorio, Rosa Custodian/ 11-15-04 31-01 ::cm ~ ~ ROMINE CUS925 annual ~ $i1 3834.23 Cl en \"' prorated Scaife, James Custodian/ 11-8-04 34-04 14532.00 FRANKLIN CUS12 annual 11563.76 prorated\n,,~ Sterley, Pamela Care/ !I: :- 11 -8-04 1-02 7.13 =l a, oC CARE CARE per hour ::c:!!! mz r-m r-cn men ,... \"' mm !I: :,0 Watson, Phyllis Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-04 11450.00  \u0026lt; n TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual 7654.78 prorated White, Donna Bus Driver/ 11-18-04 2-04 11450.00 TRANSPORTATION BUSDRV annual ?' ... 7654.78 :,,\ni prorated :\",',\n:t :, n r n ~ Personnel Changes Page6 December 16, 2004 NAME Tucker, Debbie Tate, Sharrell START DATE/ POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE Reclassification PO Entry/Inventory Control 7-1-04 Specialist/ PURCHASING DEPT. Special Programs 7-1-04 Coordinator/ PURCHASING DEPT. Approved leave as recommended by the Superintendent Nichols, Valerie- medical leave without pay (effective 11-19-04) SALARY ANNUAL CLASS SALARY 48-20 42576.00 AN12 48-20 42576.00 AN12 DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Mitchell Elementary School BACKGROUND: Mitchell Elementary, with a capacity of 283, had only 156 students enrolled on October 1, 2004, with 125 of those students living in the Mitchell attendance zone. Taking into account the fifth grade students who will move on to middle schools, only 114 attendance zone students will be affected by this action. Based on the current enrollment, the instructional cost per pupil is $10,167.55, which is approximately twice the amount spent at other elementary schools in the District. Constructed in 1908, Mitchell is unable to meet current educational standards without extensive and costly repairs and renovations. In January 2004, the Board approved funding for remediation work at Mitchell. Projects have been undertaken with approximately $356,395 spent for asbestos removal and moisture and mold remediation. Additional renovation work would bring the facility up to current codes but not in line with neighboring state-of-the-art schools, and would require additional allocation of resources. RATIONALE: The operation of low enrollment schools has been a concern in the District for several years. In May of 2000 the Board of Directors adopted Policy FBC-Closing of Schools, that allows for the consideration for closure based on factors such as excessive cost of operation due to enrollment and excessive cost of renovation and repair due to the age and physical condition of the facility. Schools in similar situations, such as Stephens, Garland, Badgett and lsh, were closed because of low enrollment coupled with high operational and renovation costs. FUNDING: N/A )\u0026lt; )\u0026lt; ,... =m  )\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m c\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; \u0026lt;... C: 0-\u0026lt; ~~ Zcr 3: rr mer Zcr -\u0026lt;c :z RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation for closing Mitchell Elementary School was provided in detail in the October report to the Board District Operation of Schools with Low Enrollment. Consideration has been given to the decline in enrollment, the capacity to accommodate the current attendance zone students at neighboring schools, and an analysis of per pupil instructional and construction costs. It is not in the best interest of students, nor is it financially prudent, to continue to use Mitchell as an elementary school. The administration recommends that we work with the community to develop other options for utilizing this facility in the future. The recommendation, which will affect students currently assigned to Mitchell Elementary School, would be effective at the beginning of the 2005-06 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 December 16, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Fair Park Elementary School BACKGROUND: Fair Park Elementary, with a capacity of 304 and an October 1, 2004 enrollment of 187, is the second lowest enrollment school in the District. Constructed in 1929, Fair Park has an unusually high instructional cost per pupil at $7,016, with a low utilization factor of 61 %. The bond issue provided funding for projects in the amount of $1.3 million. To date, heating and ventilation systems have been updated, asbestos has been removed, and energy efficient lighting has been installed. The funds remaining from the bond/ millage allocation, approximately $800,000, will remain at Fair Park and be used to convert the facility for use as an Early Childhood Center. RATIONALE: As the second lowest enrollment school in the District, Fair Park Elementary warrants a review of the options available. Board Policy FBC---Closing of Schools, provides for consideration to close a school if certain factors exist, including excessive cost of operation due to enrollment. However, converting the Fair Park facility to an early childhood education center will provide alternate educational use for the facility within a reasonable budget and timeframe. The District could realize an enhanced environment for young children and a better utilization of resources by reconfiguring the use of the Fair Park facility to an early childhood center. Focusing more attention and resources on early intervention for children will not only better prepare them for elementary and secondary grades, but most likely would bring additional students into the District that would carry into the future. We believe the community will support using the facility as an early childhood center. FUNDING: N/A X X ,- = mX  m on \u0026lt;- C: 0--\u0026lt; C: - i: zm er ...., cer 2 RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation for converting Fair Park Elementary School into an Early Childhood Education Center was provided in detail in the October report to the Board District Operation of Schools with Low Enrollment. Consideration has been given to the decline in enrollment, the capacity to accommodate the current attendance zone students at neighboring schools, and an analysis of per pupil instructional and construction costs. The benefits of operating an early childhood education center at that location would provide a better utilization of District resources and an extension of educational services to the community. Based on these facts and dialogue with the educational community, the administration recommends the reconfiguration of Fair Park from a Pre-K - 5 to an early childhood education center. The recommendation, which will affect students currently assigned to Fair Park, would be effective at the beginning of the 2005-06 school year. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services DATE: TO: December 16, 2004 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: 0-{j Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement \\:'1 Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager X X ,- ,= mX  m en ~c:: c0-:-:\u0026lt;- ~~ ~ g: ~~ C 2 DATE: TO: December 16, 2004 Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and approval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: (}(j Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement \\ '1 Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Bale Elementary $1,000.00 cash The Payless Shoe Source School to be placed in Business-School Partnership the school activity Program fund Central High School $300.00 cash to the Mr. Ronald Crawford, in girl's basketball team behalf of the Arkansas Amateur Basketball Foundation Central High School $250.00 cash to the Mr. Rush Harding girl's basketball team Central High School $250.00 cash to the Mr. Robert Lyle art department Central High School $120.00 cash to be Ms. Paula Aultz used for student incentives Otter Creek Elementary $500.00 cash to be Otter Creek Land School applied toward the Company purchase of shirts fo, teachers and staff Romine Elementary $200.00 cash for use Hunter United Methodist School by pupil service team Women's Unit, Hunter toward purchase of United Methodist Church school uniforms and/ or supplies for needy students/families Romine Elementary $100.00 cash to be Crain Chevrolet School placed in activity fund for Romine Day Treatment Program student incentives Department Item Donor Woodruff Elementary $16,000.00 cash to the Arkansas A+ Schools School A+ program for providing Network arts enrichment activities for students, professional development for teachers and art supplies. Funds will also be used for enhancement activities for strings instrument, dance, art and drum !.=.,' ensemble programs and z \u0026gt; to bring artisans to Woodruff nz 5,: to work with staff, parents ,-\na:, and students. m\ng .\na.:., Woodruff Elementary School supplies The Veterans of Foreign School valued at $100.00 Wars of the U.S., Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316 Woodruff Elementary $1,000.00 cash to be Wal-Mart #124 ?\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; mo School applied toward the !I:,- ,--ceon construction of 0- -\u0026lt;Z me, \"Peaceable Place\" m\na:, :cm mediation garden ~ ~ on the grounds ~~ c, en en Woodruff Elementary $1,250.00 cash Wal-Mart #126 School ($500.00 donated as a match for volunteer hours from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart \u0026gt;\u0026lt; employee, Tamela Warren \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ,- =m and $750.00 to be applied  \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m toward the construction on \u0026lt;-C 0-\u0026lt; of \"Peaceable Place\" ~~ mediation garden) ~ g: ~~ \"\"'cz BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATE: November 9, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FROM~arbara Anderson, Principal Bale Elementary RE: Donation The Payless Shoe Source Business-School Partnership Program has generously donated $1000.00 to Bale Elementary School on ovember 9, 2004. The money will be put in the school activity fund. We would like to especially thank Ms. Sherry Young, Training Supervisor with Payless Shoes for making the presentation of the check at Bale's morning assembly. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL 1iltU-dJ,a0 SUBJECT: DONATION Ronald Crawford, in behalf of the Arkansas Amateur Basketball Foundation, graciously donated $300.00 to our girl's basketball team. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; e\u0026gt;mn c...c c0---\u0026lt; ~~w~ mv Zv --\u0026lt;c\nz DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL Y}eu~u SUBJECT: DONATION Rush Harding of 4 Valley Creek View, Little Rock, AR 72223, graciously donated $250.00 to our girl's basketball team. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 NOVEMBER 12, 2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF---~OCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL J /CJ.,,tl!.J.i,{lt,U SUBJECT: DONATION Robert Lyle of 40 River Ridge Circle, Little Rock, AR 72227, graciously donated $250.00 to Little Rock Central High School's art department. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 11/23/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT vj,Y,, SUBJECT: ANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL J}l{t.\nJttf,Lv DO ATIO \\ Paula Aultz of 36 St. Andrews, Little Rock, AR 72212, contributed $120.00 to Little Rock Central High School for student incentives. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work\" Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, Principal Novemberl6,2004 Donation Otter Creek Land Company has donated $500.00 to help purchase shirts for the teachers and staff at Otter Creek Elementary. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,.... = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; e\u0026gt;mn c....c:: 0--\u0026lt; ~~ Zen\ni: rr mer. ~~ :z ROMINE INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL Theme: Computer Science and Basic Skills November 12, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Scull, Principal RE: Donation ~' ~ t' The donor listed below has generously donated $200.00 to be used by our pupil service team toward purchase of school uniforms and/or school supplies for students/families needing assistance: Hunter United Methodist Women Hunter United Methodist Church 330 l Romine Road Little Rock, AR 72204 Contact person { s}: Mable Donaldson, Treasurer It is recommended that this donation be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. H1mter Ullited Mell10dist w0111e11 Hunter united Methodist church November 2, 2004 Dear Ms. Scull: 3301 Romine RMd Little Ri1ck1 Arki111s,1S 7220-J-The United Methodist Women's Unit of Hunter United Methodist Church and Hunter United Methodist Church members have contributed a total of $200.00 to be used by your school counselor to purchase uniforms and school supplies for those students who need the assistance in the purchase of these items. We donate this money in honor of Ms. Jean Piggee. Ms. Piggee is the oldest member of our Women's unit and so we honor her by contributing the enclosed funds for your students. Mrs. Gracie Carter is the coordinator for this project. We had a rummage sale and members donated funds for this project. We plan to have this as an ongoing project as a part of our church's outreach ministry. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mrs. Carter. Yours truly, __ 1}(cJ--fL/ (/\nz)~ Mable Donaldson, Treasurer Hunter United Methodist Women \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,.... = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;m on c....c:: 0--\u0026lt; ~~ ~g: ~~ --\u0026lt;c :z ROMINE INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL Theme: Computer Science and Basic Skills November 30, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Scull, Principal f. '$. .,. SUBJECT: Donation Crain Chevrolet has generously donated $100.00 to Romine Elementary School. This money will be put into the Activity Fund and used for incentives for students in the Romine Day Treatment Program. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Contact Person: Ms. Crystal France Crain Chevrolet 6700 South University Little Rock, AR 72209 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jin 'Eztenefecf :)ear 'Eaucation Schoo[\" To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 17, 2004 Re: Donations Arkansas A+ Schools Network has donated $16,000.00 to the Woodruff Elementary A+ program. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide arts enrichment activities for Woodruff students, professional development for teachers, and art supplies. Funds will also be used to support activities for enhancement of our strings instrument program, dance, art, and drum ensemble programs. These funds will also be used to bring artisans to Woodruff to work with our staff, parents, and students. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Marie A. Parker, Director Arkansas A+ Schools Network College of Education University of Arkansas 311 West Avenue Annex Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 \u0026gt;\u0026lt;,\u0026gt;..\u0026lt;. = m\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  m on c....c c0--\u0026lt; ~ r? :I: V. ~ u: -4 ~ C :z WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jl.n 'E?\u0026lt;__tcncfecf ')ear 'Eaucation ScfiooC) To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 1 O, 2004 Re: Donations The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S., Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316, graciously donated school supplies to Woodruff Elementary, valued at $100.00. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will be given to students in need of supplies. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Adj. Napoleon Tillman Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. Lt. Walter E. Parker Post #1316 2304 Arch Street Little Rock, AR 72206 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 7220 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL '~n fzte.naccf ')ear faucation Schoo[\" To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 9, 2004 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #124 has donated $1000.00 to Woodruff Elementary, to be used to assist in construction Woodruff's \"Peaceable Place\" mediation garden on the grounds. we sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide plants and building materials for our mediation garden. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #124 Jason Manns, Store Manager 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Ms. Bumiegha Combs Assistant Manager Wal-Mart #124 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 \u0026gt;\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt; :- ~ ~  m on '-C 0 --\u0026lt; ~~ Zv, lC IT mv z..., vc 2 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ''Jln 'Ei(tencfecf ']car 'Ecf ucation Scfioof 11 To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: November 1 0, 2003 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #126 has donated a total of $1, 250.00 to Woodruff Elementary. A portion of the funds, $500.00, was contributed as a match for volunteer hours to our school from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart employee Tamela Warren. The remainder of the funds, $750.00, will be used to assist with the construction of Woodruff's \"Peaceable Place\" mediation garden. We sincerely appreciate this donation, and recommend that it be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #126 Renita Thompson, Personnel Manager 700 Chenal Little Rock, AR 72211 Tamela D. Warren 912 Johnson Street Little Rock, AR 7204 3010 West 7th Street  Phone (501) 447-7300  Fax (501) 447-7301  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: December 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: November 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the November 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services X \u0026gt;\u0026lt; := mX  m on \u0026lt;-C 0-\u0026lt; ~~ ~\"' m z -\u0026lt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 11/30/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 11/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 20,927,350 36.37% 61 ,436,691 23,738,299 38.64% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 6,939,208 68.71% 12,135,000 3,879,273 31 .97% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 220,826 58.11% 485,000 66,215 13.65% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 56,591 28.30% 245,000 138,537 56.55% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 118,641 49.43% 215,000 124,843 58.07% TOTAL 98,607,800 28,262,617 28.66% 106,311,691 27,947,166 26.29% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% TOTAL 21,000 11,594 55.21% 22,000 11,183 50.83% REVENUE-STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 19,354,959 36.36% 65,082,694 23,704,408 36.42% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 963,624 50.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 2,362,996 36.36% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141 ,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 2,024,292 24.39% 8,275,000 2,775,052 33.54% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 430,364 30.74% 1,350,000 528,811 39.17% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 93,470 5.58% 2,100,000 95,850 4.56% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 135,094 49.42% 5,542,510 2,593,434 46.79% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 736,844 18.89% 4,575,000 1,244,739 27.21% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 152,263 16.54% 934,380 159,488 17.07% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 24,581,235 32.87% 102,522,882 36,911,656 36.00% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 52,873,965 29.85% 212,770,581 64,878,160 30.49% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 4,554,092 1892% 21,531,929 5,898,962 27.40% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 725,821 18.15% 4,500,000 686,501 15.26% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 3,440,020 27,964,934 4,700,776 16.81% TOTAL 52,765,141 8,719,933 16.53% 53,996,863 11 ,286,239 20.90% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 61 ,593,898 26.79% 266,767,444 76,164,399 28.55% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 11/30/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 11/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 29,777,981 29.58% 117,324,912 34,814,130 29.67% BENEFITS 26,483,772 7,729,211 29.18% 36,185,811 9,790,728 27.06% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 6,769,882 34.33% 20,959,918 6,423,581 30.65% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 4,033,046 49.27% 8,725,914 3,462,370 39.68% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 195,999 12.44% 2,760,600 457,890 16.59% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 331 ,506 3.95% 10,770,418 440,411 4.09% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,699,176 38.84% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 53,536,801 30.22% 209,202,382 59,979,945 28.67% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 5,641,014 21.65% 23,853,134 5,488,675 23.01% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 1,869,745 46.74% 5,007,809 1,520,297 30.36% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 6,278,304 25.43% 27,964,934 7,196,468 25.73% TOTAL 54,745,544 13,789,063 25.19% 56,825,877 14,205,441 25.00% TOT AL EXPENSES 231,877,543 67,325,865 29.04% 266,028,259 74,185,386 27.89% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) (5,731,968) 739,184 1,979,012 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 (1 ,510,550) 1,176,943 1,086,755 OPERATING 9,052,274 8,364,018 10,099,905 11,429,921 TOTAL 10,630,451 6,853,468 11,276,848 12,516,676 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 11-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 34,521.12 50,385.09 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 799,000.00 2,477,070.65 887,411.05 3,523,038.79 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541.25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591.92 575,970.21 233,032.23 6,758,589.48 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 4,437,368.56 2,008,638.40 6,920,708.08 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 238,874.77 238,046.83 2,235,879.86 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 879,000.00 7,763,805.31 3,367,128.51 19,523,999.35 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 181,104.00 626,722.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (879,000.00) 13,264,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 386,399.64 5,423,837.59 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 567,503.64 (879,000.00) 0.00 0.00 20,613,792.33 GRAND TOTAL !l~ ~a !ll Zl l Zl!l llll!l aa QJli2 Z Z Z!l~ al a aZ l~ ~l !l!l i:a!l !l~ Zi: PROJECT ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 11-30-04 2000-01 ADMINISTRATION 753,846.55 889,772.32 NEW WORK PROJECTS 39,585,097.95 443,467.00 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 18,920,386.34 791 ,385.63 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51 ,641 ,607.54 397,615.34 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.53 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 14,557,965.72 TOTAL 143,487,112.37 5,852,669.42 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 I THRU 11-30-04 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 114,896.16 1 34,521 .12 4,589,606.29 11 ,671,442.11 15,993,062.06 2,477,070.65 109,609.73 I 27,732.73 0.00 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 9,012.76 0.00 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,887,763.72 575,970.21 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 I 18,091,992.05 4,437,368.56 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 I 765,594.97 238,874.77 I I 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 37,890,054.45 7,763,805.31 ~ ENDING ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION THRU 11-30-04 SUBTOTAL 11-30-04 I 0.00 t 703,461.46 50,385.09 887,411 .05 36,062,059.16 3,523,038.79 0.00 251,272.93 14,541 .25 0.00 I 4,862,548.33 20,856.80 23~.032.23 l 12,161,796.86 l 6,758,589.48 2,008,638.40 44,720,899.46 6,920,708.08 238,046.83 10,643,109.11 2,235,879.86 14,557,965.72 3,367,128.51 109,405,147.31 34,081,965.07 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER.30, 2004 - Fund Purchase I Maturity I Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date j j I I Operating 11-29-04 TFN Bank of America 1.870% Repo 5,340,000.00 Operating 11-29-04 t 12-01-04 Bank of America 1.880% Treasury Bills 5,499,425.56 t Operating 11-10-04 I 12-10-04 Twin City Bank 2.250% CD 4,659,613.28 Total I 15,499,038.84 Activity Fund 11-23-04 TFN Bank of America 1.790% Repo 1,225,000.00 Total - 1,225,000.00 Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions - 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01 -30-04 j 01-31 -05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 l 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% -Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 f Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 I 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 l 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 11-23-04 TFN Bank of America 1.790% Repo 3,665,000.00 Total 42,917,436.03 - Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 I Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 I 01-10-05 Bank of America I 1.670% Treasury Bills - 252,468.56 Total I 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1428","title":"\"2004-05 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2004-11-23"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["\"2004-05 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1428"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["469 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1070","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1070"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["58 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nC NOV 1 5 2004 Agenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting NOV~/v1g6R 200-4 DOm D !Jl 0 0 =l  N ,-m :,0 z OU\u0026gt; _,:,o \u0026gt;m ~ :,0\n,,\nU\u0026gt; :\u0026lt; :,0 -\u0026gt;m~ CD :,o 0 ..... \u0026gt;U\u0026gt; jg 0 31::0 ml!:: 31::ll:: CDC: ml!: :,on U\u0026gt; .\u0026gt;.. .. iz5 U\u0026gt; I. 11. 111. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING November 16, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Parkview Theater/Dance REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: V. A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting - 10-28-04 Special Meeting - 11-11-04 ,- \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;\"\" \u0026gt;:0 ,\n.-.~_ ... :11:: Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m..,\no C: -z\no (\") o-\u0026lt; F\n(\") (I) \u0026gt; F Regular Board Meeting November 16, 2004 Page 2 VI. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions IX. ADJOURNMENT !Jl (\") ~~ ~~ ~: '\"I U\u0026gt; I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. CITIZENS REMARKS C. LRCTA IV. REPORTS/ COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: November 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: Planning has started on several small construction projects for our schools. The architects are under contract with LRSD, and they are in the process of developing schematic plans and construction cost estimates for the following projects: 1. Media Center expansion at Carver Elementary. 2. Classrooms addition at Gibbs Elementary. 3. Minor renovations of Meadowcliff Elementary. 4. Window replacement at Oakhurst [Adult Education]. 5. Remodeling of Forest Heights Middle. The new Field House at Parkview has been completed and is being utilized by the staff and students. The Contractor has not finished the Parkview project because the punch list [discrepancies], developed by LRSD and the Architect, has not been completed. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer ~ ::r:: \u0026gt;c:: ~! :o Rl ~~ zc:: ,m-\nn,o !\" .z.. m :0 ~ c\u0026gt;:: 0 :::. 0 :0 m tn =...\". IT' C, :r z C,.. ~ -\u0026lt; .C.,: C: )\u0026gt; IT Facility Name Administration Brady Central Central -- Dunbar Fair Park Henderson Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem Pulaski Hgts. MS Scott Field Southwest Wakefield Wilson CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Project Description I Cost I t:st. CompletIon Date .HVAC $70,000 Nov-04 Addition/renovation $973,621 I Nov-04 Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Aug-05 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 I Dec-04  Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Nov-04 Roof $245,784 Jan-05 Lockers $43,854 Dec-04 Addition $2,121 ,226 Dec-04 Renovation $1,193,259 Nov-04 Renovation $3,755,041 I Nov-04 Track Renovations $289,056 Dec-04 Addition $2,000,000 Nov-04 Rebuild $5,300,000 Nov-04 HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 Facilitv Name I Project Description I Cost I t:st. \u0026lt;.,\nompIetion Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Gibbs Addition $705,~ Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel I $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell Renovation I $2,212,493 Unknown Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t:SL l,OmpIeuon Date Booker Electrical Upgrade I Unknown1 Unknown Chicot !Electrical Upgrade ' Unknown Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition I $520,750 I Unknown Fair Park Addition I $799,000 I Unknown Forest Heights Remodel I $1 ,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel I Unknown i Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS 'Energy monitoring system installation I Unknown Unknown Rightsell I Renovation I $2,494,000 Unknown Western Hills I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC I $640,000 Aug-05 Woodruff I Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration 1 Fresh air system I $55,ooo I Aug-03 Administration 1Fire alarm $32,350 I Aug-03 Administration Annex 1 Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 I Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000  Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 ---- Bale . Energy monitoring system Mar-02 -- -- Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 Dec-01 -- - - -- --- Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Facility Name Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Carver Carver Central Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Dodd Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Fulbright ___ Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Franklin Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Renovation $953,520 Aug-04 Gym Roof $48,525 Oct-04 ADA Rest rooms $25,QQQ I Aug-04 Energy efficient lighting $170,295 I Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 I Oct-01 ,Asbestos abatement I $10,900 I Feb-02 Fire alarm I $34,501 I Mar-02 ,Energy efficient lighting $80,593 I Sep-02 Asbestos abatement $345,072 . Aug-02 Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01  Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Reflecting Pond I $57,561 I Sep-04 Student parking $174,ooo I Aug-03 Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Aug-03 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 I Aug-03 'Irrigation System $14,500 Aug-03 Purchase land for school I Unknown I Dec-02 Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Dec-02 1 Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Oct-01 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation -+-- I $80,876 Aug-01\nFront landing tile repair I $22,470 I Aug-01 1Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Sound Attenuation $43,134 I Jul-04 Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 Jul-01 i Energy efficient lighting $189,743 I Jul-01 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Nov-02  Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Oct-04 Energy efficient lighting I $90,665 I Aug-01 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 I Jul-01 Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 I Aug-02 Interior renovation I $84,672 Mar-01 Fire alarm I $12,000 I Aug-03 HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 I Apr-02 Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Asbestos abatement-ceiling I $59,310 T Aug-01 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition I $3.155.640 I Aug-04 Energy efficient lighting I $277,594 I Apr-01 Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 Security cameras I $12,500 I Jun-01 Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 I Jul-03 Irrigation System I $14,ooo I Jul-03 Roof repairs $391 ,871 Aug-03 - Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 I Nov-03 Diagonal parking $111 ,742 Aug-03 ' Energy efficient lighting . $119,788 May-01 Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Jun-01 Energy monitoring system installation I $11,950 Aug-01 Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 - Aug-02 Parking lot I $140,000 Sep-02 Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 - - -- Renovation $2,511,736 Mar-03 Roof Repair $161,752 Jun-04 Energy efficient lighting $76,447  Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation $11,770 Jul-01 2 ~ ::c \u0026gt; C: ~! ::a Rl ~ is z C: m\na r-n !\" z ..... m ,i... \u0026gt; C: C ~\na m U\u0026gt; Facility Name Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson IRC Jefferson Jefferson Laidlaw Mablevale Elem Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale MS Mabelvale MS Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McDermott McDermott McDermott Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description Cost Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Asbestos abatement $168,222 Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Energy efficient lighting $296,707 I Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Intercom Security cameras $10,600 Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Roof replacement gym $107,835 Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 Asbestos abatement $43,639 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1 ,630,000 Parking lot $269,588 Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Replace HVAC units $300,000 Asbestos Abatement I $107,000 Energy efficient lighting $106,598 Renovate bleachers $134,793 Renovation $6,851 ,621 Partial Replacement $11 ,500,000 Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Walkway canopies is what has been Boiler replacement used so far on the Fencing projects listed Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Athletic Field Improvement $38 ,000 Irrigation System $14,750 Security cameras $36,300 Energy efficient lighting $303 ,614 Stadium stands repair $235,000 I Intercom $46,000 Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 Energy efficient lighting $79,411 Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 Fire alarm $16,175 !Asbestos abatement I I $253,412 Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 I Replace cooling tower $37,203 I I Replace shop vent system $20,000 Energy monitoring system installation I $17,145 I Building Remediation I $165,QQQ I\nEnergy efficient lighting I $103,642 Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Asbestos abatement $13,000 I HVAC renovation $237,237 Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 I Energy efficient lighting $81 ,828 I [Asbestos abatement $10 ,000 , Parking lot $138,029 6 classroom addition I $888 ,778 Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Est. Completion Date Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Apr-01 Aug-01 Feb-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 May-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Jul-02 Oct-01 Nov-02 Jul-01 Oct-04 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Dec-00 May-01 Aug-01 Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD NOVEMBER 18, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facilitv Name Project Description Cost Parkview , HVAC controls $210,000 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 I Parkview , Locker replacement $120,000 Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Procurement 'Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 . Procurement ,Fire alarm I $25,000 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground I $17,000 Rightsell 1Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting I $137,004 Rockefeller , Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Rockefeller Parking addition I $111,742 Romine IAsbestos abatement $10,000 I Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 . Security/Transportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Southwest New roof $690,000 Southwest Energy efficient lighting I $168,719 Southwest Drainage I street widening $250,000 I Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation - $4,830 - Student Assignment Fire alarm I ~ 9,000 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 I Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade $11 ,600 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,000 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Western Hills . ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Western Hills  Asbestos abatement $191 ,946 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Williams Parking expansions $183 ,717 Williams I Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 Est. Completion Date Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Aug-03 Dec-02 Apr-01 Mar-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Apr-02 Mar-03 Jun-01 Aug-00 Oct-03 Jan-02 Aug-03 Aug-02 Aug-03 Dec-01 Jun-04 Nov-02 Feb-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Jun-01 Feb-01 Nov-02 Oct-04 Jun-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-04 Aug-04 Aug-02 Dec-01 Jul-01 Mar-04 Dec-03 Jun-01 Feb-04 Aug-03 Auo-02 4 !\" z -I m I \u0026gt; C: C ~\na\n,i -I nm :,: :z C r- ~ -\u0026lt; C: ,\"C,\": rr LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker ~ % . c: ~\nllz ::0 fll ~~ zc: m::o r-n m en !..ll, z  z C') \u0026gt;,... cn =\"' -m\u0026lt; c-, :r z C,.. ~ -\u0026lt; C: \"'C \nIT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: November 16, 2004 To: Board of Directors GP From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - November This is the sixty-first communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - November 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. f) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. g) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year were: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). A narrative report will be sent to the Board on Sharefest 2004. d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-44 7-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. .!.I,' z \u0026gt;z C') ~ (I) DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: Since the last Board meeting the following technology activities took place:  Installation of the Safari media retrieval system at Rockefeller Elementary was completed. Staff attended the initial training sessions during the week of November 8 and immediately began to use the system. Additional training will be scheduled that emphasizes integration of the system into classroom instruction. Training begins at Wakefield the week of November 29.  We are moving forward with plans to offer web access to parents for student grades. This year we will bring up the high schools. Parkview will be the first site to go online. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services !El \"z,T.l z C') \u0026gt; ~ DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are consid~~jd intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly Williamsfoirector of Human Resources !.J.,I z \u0026gt;z C\") ~ \"' Personnel Changes Page 2 November 18, 2004 NAME Powell, Rosie Reason: Retired Smith, James Reason: Deceased Anders, Mika Henry, Lauren Hill, Dorothy Hughes, Alicia Lloyd, Anna Nichols, Susan START DA TE/ SALARY POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Elem V/ 8-20-90 1-15 FAIR PARK 11-5-04 TCH 925 Social Studies/ 8-16-02 2-03 MCCLELLAN 9-1-04 TCH925 New Certified Employees Writing/ 9-15-04 3-06 MABELVALE MIDDLE TCH925 Kindergarten/ 10-4-04 1-01 CARVER K925 Elem II/ 10-4-04 4-18 MEADOWCLIFF TCH925 Elem IV/ 10-6-04 1-09 CHICOT TCH925 Music/ 10-8-04 1-01 DODD TCH925 Oral Communications/ 8-11-04 4-18 CENTRAL TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 45059.oo 32697.oo 28248.75 annual 24717.66 prorated 30040.00 annual 24251 .04 prorated 53061.00 annual 42835.70 prorated 38127.00 annual 30382.45 prorated 30040.00 annual 23625.21 prorated 59969.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 November 18, 2004 NAME Ogren, Kathryn Page, Taranah Robinson, Preston Wise, Steven START DATE/ SALARY POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS 4 Yr Old/ 10-8-04 1-01 ROMINE TCH925 Elem V/ 9-27-04 1-02 ROMINE TCH925 Social Studies/ 8-18-04 6-10 ALC TCH925 Certified Promotion ANNUAL SALARY 30340.00 annual 23625.21 prorated 30617.00 annual 25514.17 prorated 46966.00 annual 45742.93 prorated Promoted from 9.25 mo. teacher to Assistant Principal at J. A. Fair High School Certified Transfer NONE Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Aguilar, Alicia Child Nutrition/ 8-12-03 3-03 9442.00 Reason: Personal PARKVIEW 10-28-04 FSHR2 Dobbins, Tonya Instructional Aide/ 8-31-00 33-14 15179.00 Reason: Returning to school KING 10-15-04 INA925 Holmes, Antjonne Care/ 8-19-04 2-10 8.95 Reason: None Given CARE 10-22-04 CARE per hour Personnel Changes Page4 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION/ SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Humphrey, Deborah Instructional Aide/ 8-13-01 33-17 16595.oo Reason: Accepted Another WILSON 10-25-04 INA925 Position McReynolds, Ashley Care/ 8-19-04 2-05 8.18 Reason: None Given CARE 10-22-04 CARE per hour Privett, Reanetta Instructional Aide/ 8-11-04 33-03 10934.00 Reason: Personal CHICOT 10-20-04 INA925 Sobba, Earle Child Nutrition/ 8-17-04 3-01 9350.00 Reason: Personal J. A. Fair 10-20-04 FSH550 New Non-Certified Employees Baggett, Jeffery Custodian/ 10-4-04 46-7 27216.00 CENTRAL CUS12 annual 19919.80 prorated Bealer, Dechandra Instructional Aide/ 10-11-04 33-9 13070.00 GIBBS INA925 annual 10244.05 prorated Bennett, Georgetta Instructional Aide/ 8-30-04 33-11 13875.00 ALC INA925 annual 12900.00 prorated Chambliss, Ruby Custodian/ 10-6-04 31-1 5689.50 MABELVALE MIDDLE CUS925 annual 4607.26 prorated Chan, Sabrina Instructional Aide/ 10-14-04 33-3 10392.00 TERRY INA925 annual 8392.58 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Chestnut, Andrew Custodian/ 9-27-04 1-01 5689.50 HALL CUS925 annual 4761.86 prorated Davis, Theresa Nurse/ 9-20-04 52-7 32544.00 WESTERN HILLS NURSES annual OTTER CREEK 27967.50 prorated Grafals, Wademar Instructional Aide/ 10-19-04 33-3 10934.00 OTTER CREEK INA925 annual 8215.28 prorated Gray, Aisha Instructional Aide/ 10-18-04 33-3 3280.20 ~ GIBBS INA925 annual ,.m 2482.31 . c= 8~ prorated zm ,_ui -, u, i5 u, zm Guest, Jr., Maurice Instructional Aide/ 10-13-04 33-16 13459.00 u,~ FOREST PARK INA925 annual m u, 10403.44 prorated Hayes, Freddie Custodian/ 9-10-04 31-1 14532.00 MANN CUS12 annual 11563.76 prorated ~ Islam, Neatera Secretary/ 10-4-04 40-1 19020.00 -n z SAFETY AND SECURITY CLK11 annual  z 13919.18 C') ,- prorated u, Jones, Vicky Nurse/ 9-20-04 52-8 33528.00 METRO NURSES annual 28813.13 prorated Mayberry, Anthony Security Officer/ 8-16-04 36-5 15463.00 ~ MANN SOFR9 ?,\u0026lt;. .~- cO .... u, Oz c= G') sl ill ~~ ~$i! u, Personnel Changes Page 6 November 18, 2004 START DATE/ SALARY ANNUAL NAME POSITION / SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY Page, Wilbur District-Wide Security 10-11-04 28-14 20184.oo SAFETY AND SECURITY AN950 annual 15616.04 prorated Pittman, Silster Custodian/ 9-27-04 31-1 5869.50 DUNBAR CUS925 annual 4761 .86 prorated Qaasim, Najiyyah Media Clerk/ 10-21-04 31-6 18872.0Q WAKEFIELD CLK925 annual WILSON 12474.51 prorated Renaud, Randall Technology Specialist/ 9-9-04 4-12 29760.0Q CENTRAL AN11 annual 24078.55 prorated Roberson, Carolyn Trainee/ 10-11-04 2-01 13330.00 CHILD NUTRITION FSMEAL annual 10508.84 prorated Robinson, Dorothy Care/ 10-18-04 1-07 7.89 CARE CARE per hour Staten, Allison Nurse/ 10-4-04 52-8 33528.00 GIBBS NURSES annual 27066.87 prorated Sveum, Rob Instructional Aide/ 10-5-04 33-3 5467.00 PHMS INA925 annual 4403.15 prorated Taylor, Alton Parent Facilitator/ 9-27-04 37-20 30660.00 PUPIL SERVICES AN10 annual 25141.20 prorated Personnel Changes Page 7 November 18, 2004 NAME Tillman, Mary Webb, Brenda White, John POSITION / SCHOOL Instructional Aide/ CARVER Nurse/ WILSON Instructional Aide/ GIBBS START DATE/ SALARY END DATE CLASS 10-14-04 33-9 INA925 9-28-04 52-8 NURSES 10-11-04 33-3 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10145.60 annual 7787.43 prorated 13411 .20 annual 11106.15 prorated 3280.20 annual 2570.97 prorated ~ \u0026gt;. ac:,: g\nzm \u0026gt; VJ .... VJ i5 VJ zm VJ~ m VJ !.D., z \u0026gt;z n ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 18, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and aproval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: \\),Q Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~ Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager .!%.,' z \u0026gt;z 0 ,\u0026gt;- en / DONATIONS School/Department Item Q2nQ! Alternative Learning 400 pairs of pants, Levi Strauss Center valued at $5.00 per pair, for a total of $2,000.00 Bale Elementary $1,000.00 cash John H. Bale, Jr. School to be deposited into activity fund to be used for student incentives Central High School $650.00 cash Robert \u0026amp; Lisa Beach to the baseball team Central High School $4,500.00 grant, in Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Christopher behalf of the Keller Keller Family Endowment, to support school programs Central High School $1,700.00 cash to Mr. Jeff Poe the Baseball Booster Club Central High School $115.00 cash to Miriam Hundley the Troubadour Club J.A. Fair High School Donation of a Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry refrigerator, including Nichols, Nichols' delivery \u0026amp; removal of Appliance Co., Inc. of old one, valued at $260.00, for the girls' locker room J.A. Fair High School Labor and materials, Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry valued at $144.00, for Nichols, Nichols' servicing refrigerator Appliance Co., Inc. in Ms. Steele's room J.A. Fair High School Donation of a computer Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry desk, valued at $50.00, Nichols, Nichols' for Sammie Jamel! Appliance Co., Inc. J.A. Fair High School Labor and materials, Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry valued at $210.00, for Nichols, Nichols' servicing dryer in field Appliance Co., Inc. house School/Department Item Donor J.A. Fair High School Donation of a Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry refrigerator, valued Nichols, Nichols' at $300.00, for Appliance Co., Inc. Ms. Ayers room Forest Park Donation of the Jeff \u0026amp; Melanie Fox Elementary School following terns: painting valued at $1,456.84, file cabinet valued at $153.14, a weed eater valued at $110.00, a safe valued at $600.00, mailbox system valued at $7 42.12 \u0026amp; Pre-K storage valued at $432.69 Franklin Elementary Four (4) new UN#55 Mr. Lawrence Williams School gallon open top Gesco Co., Inc. barrels, valued at $200.00, to be placed on campus Fulbright Elementary Cash donations as Fulbright PT A School follows: $190.14 for purchasing a book cart for 5th grade\n$506.1 O for reimbursement for May, 04 field trip\n$374.85 for speech articles and $341.88 for 5th grade Thesaurus !.,I.I, z \u0026gt; Fulbright Elementary $50.00 cash to the Ms. Jennae Stewart z (\") \u0026gt; School \"Reading Buddies\" I\"'\" (/) program Fulbright Elementary $30.00 cash to the Fox Consulting School \"Reading Buddies\" program Fulbright Elementary $70.00 cash to the Jamie Mitchell ~ School \"Reading Buddies\" ,?..\u0026lt;,.~.. program c:,O \u0026lt;..C/1 Oz Cc\n) Fulbright Elementary $15.00 cash to the Stephanie Hymel ~ ~ ~ f\nSchool \"Reading Buddies\" !i ~ program (/) School/Department Item Donor Fulbright Elementary $700.00 cash for Delta Esther Pipkin, Arkansas School Society Pet Partners Childrens' Hospital Course \u0026amp; Evaluations Fulbright Elementary Materials, valued at Home Depot School $130.00, to help bring Ms. Shuffield's Pre-K loft to OHS guidelines Fulbright Elementary Cornelius Model #530X Kevin \u0026amp; Angela Chase School ice machine, valued at $2,800.00, to be used by staff, students and school nurse Fulbright Elementary Educational \u0026amp; fun Mr. Jim Harvey, CEO, School materials, valued at Central Arkansas Water $750.00, for the new outdoor classroom Fulbright Elementary Books \u0026amp; guides, Mr. Rob Beadel, ADEQ, School valued at $95.80, Environmental Preservation for the new outdoor Division classroom Mann Magnet $2,000.00 cash to Family of the late Middle School purchase a podium James L. Matthis with accommodations for musical attachments. The podium is to be I placed in the James L. Matthis Auditorium. The family requests that Mr. Matthis' name be inscribed on the podium. Otter Creek $200.00 cash to be used Truman Ball \u0026amp; Associates Elementary School to purchase shirts for Realtors teachers and staff Otter Creek $500.00 cash to be used The Women's Club of Elementary School for student recognition in Otter Creek the Accelerated Reader Program Little Rock School $1,000.00 cash for the Lisenne \u0026amp; Winthrop P. District Dunbar Garden Project Rockefeller STUDENT DISCIPLINE Fax:501234-0536 Oct 22 2004 08 :55 P. 02 810 West Markham Little Rock. AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-3580 Lll\\'DA WATSO.N,Ed.D. E-mail: !hula.watson@lrsd.org DATE: TO: October 21 , 2004 Darral Paradis Director of Procurement ASSIST A.NT SUPERINTENDENT STUDENT DISCIPLI~E Fax: (501) 447-3581 FROM: Jodie Carter, Princj~l Alternative Leaming Center Dr. Linda Watsor~ssistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Donation l...evi Strauss has made a contribution of four hundred (400) pairs of pants to the Alternative Learning Center. The pants cost $5.00 per pair. We are grateful to Levi Strauss for this generous donation. It is ecommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. C: Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Michael Thrasher, Administrator ALC Cindy Lewis, Levi Strauss !.D., z \u0026gt;z C') ~ . , ...... ,... .1\n- ... BALE ELEfvlENTARY SCHOOL DATE: October 19, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FROM:\\}jlarbara Anderson, Principal f iale Elementary RE: Donation John H. Bale, Jr., 13101 Chenal Parkway - PO Box 22070, has generously donated $ 1000.00 to Bale Elementary School on October 19, 2004. This money will be put into the Activity Fund and used for incentives for good behavior, completing math activities for the Math Word of the Week and other student activities. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. - ,-,.... \" DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL , ({2~ {A,lj_ftlV SUBJECT: DONATION Robert \u0026amp; Lisa Beach of 17924 Agee Lane, Little Rock, AR 72223, donated $650.00 to the Central High School baseball team. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. RECE]\\!ED .!.l,l z \u0026gt;z C') ~ DATE: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/11/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT /) FROM: ANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL --\n)V:,,tlL/_lLU . ../ SUBJECT: DONATION Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Christopher Keller of 5224 Country Club Boulevard, Little Rock, AR 72207, in behalf of the Keller Family Endowment, donated a $4,500.00 grant to Little Rock Central High School. The purpose of the grant is support for Central High School programs. It is my recommendation that this be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 10/7/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF 1:RRCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL f f~U SUBJECT: DONATION Jeff Poe of 1521 Mountain Drive, Little Rock, AR 72227, very generously donated $1,700.00 to the Little Rock Central High School Baseball Booster Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ., .!E.,l z  z C') ~ Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 DATE: 10/6/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Miriam Hundley of 5123 Edgewood Road, Little Rock, AR 72207, donated $115.00 to the Little Rock Central High Troubadour Club. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. J. A. Fair Magnet High School Science and Technology Systems 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone 501-447-1700. Fax 501-447-1701 To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Cassandra Norman, Principal ef(\"' Re: Donations Date: October 20, 2004 I would like to recommend that the following donations to J. A. Fair Magnet High School be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District: Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry Nichols Nichol's Appliance Co., Inc. 3110 Midland Road Alexander, AR 72002 See attached list of items and services. OCT Z 2 20D4 Thomas \u0026amp; Sherry Nichols Nichols' Appliance Co. Inc. 311 O Midland Rd. Alexander, AR. J.A. Fair High School Aug. 25th , 2004 The following services were donated to J.A. Fair: 1 Refrigerator for the girls locker room. $225.00 delivered \u0026amp; removed old one. $ 35.00 Sep.9,2004 Checked refrigerator in Ms. Steele Room Replaced blower motor and cleaned coil Sep.9,2004 $ 35.00 Labor $ 39.00 Material $ 70.00 Labor Computer desk donated \u0026amp;delivered to Sammie Jamell Value of computer desk $50.00 Oct. 14, 2004 Checked Dryer in Field House Needed new belt Replaced Belt @ Labor Aug 20, 2004 Refrigerator for Ms.Ayers Room Total Donation for 2004 $45.00 Labor $165.00 Parts \u0026amp; Labor $300.00 Value of Refrigerator $964.00 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 10/22/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT THERESA COURTNEY-KETCHER, PRINCIPAL,-( DONATION Jeff and Malanie Fox of 5300 Edgewood Rd., Little Rock, AR 72207, donated the following items, valued at $3,494.90, to Forest Park Elementary School. Painting File Cabinet Weed Eater Safe Mailbox System Pre-K Storage $1,456.84 153.14 110.00 600.00 742.12 432.69 It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .!l.:,l z \u0026gt;z 0 \u0026gt; I'\"' U\u0026gt; To: From: Date: Re: MEMORANDUM Darrell Paradis, Director of Procurement Ethel B. Dunbar[ irincipal Tuesday, November 2, 2004 Donation ************************************************************************* Lawrence Williams of Gesco Co, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas, has donated four new UN#55 gallon open top barrels valued at $200.00 to Franklin Elementary. These barrels will be placed on the campus. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the policies of the LRSD. EBD:mls 1701 S. Harrison  Little Rock, AR 72204  Phone (501) 447-4600 Fax (501) 477-4601 Fulbright Elementary Memo To: From: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement Deborah Mitchell, Principal CC: Date: October 26, 2004 Re: Donations to Fulbright Elementary The Fulbright PTA, 300 Pleasant Valley Drive, Little Rock, Arkansas 72212, has generously donated the following to Fulbright: $190.14 For a Book Cart for 5th Grade\n$506.10 reimbursement for May 2004 field trip\n$374.85 reimbursement Speech articles\n$341.88 reimbursement for 5th grade Thesaurus. Reading Buddies, our canine-assisted literacy intervention program, has received donations from the following persons: Ms. Jennae Stewart, 3814 Wynne St., Little Rock, AR 72204 $50 Fox Consulting, 2603 Wentwood Valley, Dr., Little Rock, AR 72212 $30 Jamie Mitchell, 500 Napa Valley Drive, Little Rock, AR 72211 $70 Stephanie Hymel, 59 Rocky Valley Rd. Little Rock, 72211 $15 Esther Pipkin, Arkansas Childrens Hospital, 800 Marshall St. 72202 $700 donation for Delta Society Pet Partners Course and Evaluations Home Depot, Darren Lomas and Gerald Little, 1261 O Chenal Parkway, Little Rock, AR 72211, donated $130 worth of materials to help bring Ms. Shuffields PreK's loft to OHS guidelines. ECu\\!ED OCT 2 8 200~ It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, OOM~ Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam  Page2 RECEIVED OCT 2 8 2004 ~r-nt   TT i-  .,\n...,. ~ ._1 ..... -.. ..... w.1~ Fulbright Elementary Memo To: From: CC: Date: Re: Darral Paradis, Director Of Procurement Deborah Mitchell, Principal October 28, 2004 Donations to Fulbright Elementary Kevin and Angela Chase, 5 Longlea Cover, Little Rock, AR 72212, has generously donated a Cornelius Model 530 X Ice Machine valued at $2,800 to Fulbright Elementary School. The machine will be available to staff, students, and the nurse. Central Arkansas Water, Jim Harvey, CEO, 221 East Capitol Avenue, PO Box 1789, Little Rock, AR 72203, has contributed educational and fun materials for Fulbright's new outdoor classroom in the amount of $750. Mr. Rob Beadel, ADEQ, Environmental Preservation Division, 8001 National Drive, PO Box 8913, Little Rock, AR 72219-8913, has donated $95.80 in books and guides for the outdoor classroom. It is recommended that these donations be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District board of Directors. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, \u0026amp;lf411,J! n\"~t1tet Deborah Mitchell Principal DM:lam OCi 2 8 2004 !.D., z z\u0026gt; C') ~ October 28,2004 To: Dr. Roy Brooks Superintendent Little Rock School District From:~stelle Matthis and Family of the late James L. Matthis Subject: Donation to Horace Mann Middle School The family of the late James L. Matthis wishes to donate $2000.00 to Mann Middle School to purchase a podium with accommodations for musical attachments to be placed in the James L.Matthis Auditorium .We request that his name be inscribed on the podium. We are deeply appreciative of the many acts of kindness that the Board of Directors, district administrators, staff, students and parents of Mann Middle School have shown to us over an extended period of time. Please feel free to contact me if additional information is needed and/or if additional funds are needed to purchase the podium.You may reach me at 501-682-4240-during the day and 501-664-7324 after work. I RECEIVED MOV 4 2004 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work\" Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, PrincipaliJ ,T. October 20, 2004 Donation Truman Ball and Associates Realtors has donated $200.00 to help purchase shirts for the teachers and staff at Otter Creek Elementary School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVEO OCT 2 Z 2Gu4 / OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: RE: \"Team Work makes the Dream Work'' Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Janis Tucker, Principali :1 . October 20, 2004 Donation The Women's Club of Otter Creek has donated $500.00 for student recognition in the Accelerated Reader Program at Otter Creek Elementary School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED OCT 2 2 2004 16000 Otter Creek Par~way  Phons 5011 ..\n.. 7-5800  Fax (501 1 447-5301  Little Rock, Arkansas 722 .e, PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: November 9, 2004 TO: jBoard of Directors FROM: V Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation Lisenne and Winthrop P. Rockefeller donated a check in the amount of $1,000.00 to the Little Rock School District for the Dunbar Garden Project. The donor's mailing address is: Lisenne and Winthrop P. Rockefeller, P. 0 . Box 3157, Little Rock, AR 72203. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. Thank you. .!.I,' z \u0026gt;z n ~ \"' ~ ?\u0026lt; ~ \u0026gt;,... oO c...V\u0026gt; Oz c: Cl ~ill ifi~ ~~ \"' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: November 16, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: October 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the October 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manage~ Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES ANO CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2003 ANO 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 10/31 /03 COLLECTED 2004/05 10/31 /04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 20,927,350 36.37% 61.436,691 23,738,299 38.64% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 1,040,302 10.30% 12,135,000 1,209,714 9.97% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 209,253 55.07% 485,000 23,723 4.89% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 47,449 23.72% 245,000 105,513 43.07% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 92,899 38.71% 215,000 89,581 41 .67% TOTAL 98,607,800 22,317,253 22.63% 106,311,691 25,166,829 23.67% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 11 ,183 50.83% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 11,183 50.83% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 14,516,219 27.27% 65,082,694 17,787,800 27.33% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,772,247 27.27% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 2,024,292 24.39% 8,275,000 2,081 ,289 25.15% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 385,365 27.53% 1,350,000 308,278 22.84% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 630 0.04% 2,100,000 31 ,050 1.48% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 135,094 49.42% 5,542,510 1.430,540 25.81% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 736,844 18.89% 4,575,000 829,826 18.14% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 152,263 16.54% 934,380 159.488 17.07% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267.486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9.400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 19,604,656 26.22% 102,522,882 27,365,584 26.69% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,155 0.63% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632.430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,155 0.21% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 41,945,848 23.68% 212,770,581 52,551,752 24.70% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 2,939,886 12.21% 21 ,531 ,929 2,623,611 12.18% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 467,668 11 .69% 4,500,000 572,263 12.72% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 3.437 ,595 27,964 ,934 3,312,124 11 .84% TOTAL 52,765,141 6,845,149 12.97% 53,996,863 6,507,998 12.05% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 48,790,996 21.22% 266,767,444 59,059,750 22.14% ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2003 AND 2004 - APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 10/31/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 10/31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 25,532,613 25.36% 117,324,912 25,389,710 21 .64% BENEFITS 26,483,772 6,677,467 25.21% 36,185,811 6,545,838 18.09% pURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 4,572,136 23.19% 20,959,918 4,904,019 23.40% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 3,336,724 40.76% 8,725,914 3,068,675 35.17% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 175,425 11.13% 2,760,600 412,709 14.95% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 315,182 3.76% 10,770,418 429,294 3.99% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,578,079 37.84% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% ~TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 45,187,626 25.51% 209,202,382 45,341,080 21.67% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 4,420,649 16.97% 23,853,134 3,686,901 15.46% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 970,932 24.27% 5,007,809 1,476,865 29.49% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 5,290,907 21.43% 27,964,934 5,151 ,960 18.42% TOTAL 54,745,544 10,682,488 19.51% 56,825,877 10,315,726 18.15% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 55,870,114 24.09% 266,028,259 55,656,806 20.92% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) (7,079,119) 739,184 3,402,943 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 (278,760) 1,176,943 198,229 OPERATING 9,052,274 5,785,077 10,099,905 13,742,378 TOTAL 10,630,451 5,506,317 11,276,848 13,940,607 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31 , 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01 -04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 10-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 34,521.12 50,385.09 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 799,000.00 2,103,385.07 929,024.70 3,855,110.72 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541 .25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591.92 537,160.27 262,272.87 6,768,158.78 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 4,037,938.95 1,957,666.51 7,371 ,109.58 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 238,765.02 237,888.58 2,236,147.86 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 879,000.00 6,951,770.43 3,386,852.66 20,316,310.08 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 181,104.00 626,722.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (879,000.00) 13,264,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 361 ,740.47 5,399,178.42 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 542,844.47 (879,000.00) 0.00 0.00 20,589,133.16 GRAND TOTAL ~l!65HlliZl l !ill!i :.l:.ll !i!i .Q.l!.12 !i l!:i~ !iZ!l~\ni ~ ~II 11:ijl !i!i ~!l l!l!ll ll:i :.lll LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU T-HE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2004 PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LiGHTING PROJECTS 1 I PROJECT ALLOCATIONS THRU 10-31-04 EXPENSE 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 753,846.55 889,772j2 - (485,325.77( 149,597.63 39,585,097]5 443,467.00 - 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 265,814.17 113,930.47 ------:,09,609.73 4,883,405.13 2,641~3 1,832,392.06 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR - - 18,920,386~ 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 379,661.38 3,455,350.67 RENOVATION PROJECTS --~ 51,641,607.54 397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.~3 -4,32520f\"40 - - - 4,500,374.61 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL 1N3WNMnorm, 'Xl S)IM\\IW3M ~NISOl::\u0026gt; 'Ill,\\ 143,487,112.37 5,852,669:42 - 18, 708,823]2 35,822,666.30 - --- - EXPENSE 2003-04 EXPENSE ENCUMBERED THRU 10-31-04 THRU 10-31-04 ~- SUBTOTAL 114,896.16 34,521.12 0.00 703,461.46 15,993,062.06 2,103,385.07 929,024.70 35,729,987.23 27,732.73 0.00 0.00 251,272.93 9,012.76 - 0~00 6.00 4,862,548.33 2,887,763.72 537,160.27 262,272.87 12,152,227.56 18:091,992.05 4,037,938.95 ~ 1,957,666.51 44,270,497.96 765-,59-4.97- - 238,765.02 237,888.58 10,642,841.11 37~,890,-054-.45 6,951,770.43 3,386,852.66 f 08~612,836.58 - ENDING ALLOCATION 10-31-04 50,385.09 3,855,110.72 14,541.25 - 20,856.80 - -- 6,768,158.78 7,371,109.58 _ 2,~36,147.86 14,-557,965.72 - 34,874,275.80 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31 , 2004 Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 10-28-04 TFN Bank of America 1.610% Repo 9,825,000.00 Operating 10-15-04 11 -15-04 Bank of America 1.690% Treasury Bills 6,000,255.24 Operating 10-12-04 11-10-04 Twin City Bank 2.250% CD 4,651,035.55 Total 20,476,290.79 Activity Fund 10-18-04 TFN Bank of America 1.530% Repo 1,160,000.00 Total 1,160,000.00 I Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01 -31 -05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 10-28-04 TFN Bank of America 1.590% Repo 1,350,000.00 Total 43,679,086.09 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01 -10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_213","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration","Little Rock School District","North Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/213"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["128 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nM TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED TO (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 DISTRICT: 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON- DAYS TRANSPORTED ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25528.40 1194. 60 QUARTER NO. 1 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 554.97 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 580.92 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 554.97 580.92 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002050 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON-TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 309.00 AMBOY ELEMENTAR 4 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 13. 00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUARTER NO. 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 6. 72 1 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 6.72 7.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 1 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 53.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 6.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1. 28 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.15 1.28 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 4 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002057 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS EL QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 136.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 2.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 2.96 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 3.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 2.96 3.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 6 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002058 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMEN QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 547.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 11. 90 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 12 .11 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 11.90 12.11 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 7 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002059 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET M QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 1834.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 62.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 39.88 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 41. 24 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 39.88 41.24 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 8 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 4 6. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.00 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 9 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELE QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 179. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 3. 89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 4.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 3.89 4.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 11 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002064 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 41. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 AOT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 0.89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL AOT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 0.89 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 12 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002065 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 32 9. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 7.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.35 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 7.15 7.35 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 13 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002070 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 6495.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 304.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 141.20 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 147. 80 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 141,20 147.80 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 16 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS DAYS IN PRESENT QTR TRANSPORTED 46 46 46 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 8612.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 332.00 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 187.22 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 194. 4 3 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 187.22 194.43 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 17 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002076 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED o.oo 0.00 6677.40 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 414. 60 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 145 .16 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 154.17 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 145.16 154.17 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 18 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD CHART QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 269.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 32.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 5.85 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 6.54 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 5.85 6.54 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 20 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM RECEIVED OCTOBER 1, 2004 NO2V 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS OFFIOCEF OESEGREGOANTIITOOtUR,I NG joo1-C E TRAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 09 II 9 189 225 4 8 0 153 144 744 10 7 7 152 140 7 2 2 0 107 136 560 II 6 14 125 104 2 0 0 0 126 107 484 ---- 12 s 4 92 98 3 4 0 105 103 415 TOT AL FOR: CE TRAL 29 34 558 567 16 14 2 2 491 490 2,203 ,_.. I ~:5 __,,,, J I - ., _/ 1002-HALL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 09 2 2 223 197 20 34 24 22 526 IO 2 3 137 125 22 26 0 22 18 356 II 4 107 133 13 IS 0 0 27 32 334 12 2 97 84 IO II 2 0 17 22 248 TOTAL FOR: HALL 9 12 564 539 65 86 4 90 94 1,464 ,- //C3 177 I ~ ... ~ 1003-MANN M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 06 6 91 59 8 4 0 0 73 SI 293 07 s 7 94 54 5 4 0 0 73 52 294 08 8 s 83 58 6 6 0 59 60 286 - TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS 19 13 268 171 19 14 0 205 163 873\"\" ~a? / (, ~(,,../ .$ joos- p ARK.VIEW GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 7 3 87 64 8 0 71 57 301 IO 4 83 62 6 6 60 56- 280 II 6 3 80 59 5 4 2 0 65 50 274 12 2 6 83 47 6 3 0 0 66 40 253 - TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW 16 16 333 232 25 16 3 2 262 203 1,108..., L5l~ .,, 7 -y\"i::= COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 1 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 006-BOOKER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I Ol 2 0 30 24 2 0 0 15 21 95 02 0 0 26 29 0 0 32 18 107 03 26 29 2 2 0 0 28 15 104 04 23 24 2 2 0 25 16 95 05 0 34 27 2 3 0 0 25 20 l 12 K 0 0 23 28 2 0 0 20 18 92 TOT AL FOR: BOOKER 5 2 162 161 10 9 3 0 145 108 605.. .......- _J\n'.\nf3 d(9 ~53 ~ 1001-ou BARM/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 06 3 7 77 85 9 4 0 0 30 40 255 ------- 07 3 3 81 68 5 9 0 0 25 48 242 08 6 74 68 7 11 0 37 43 250 TOTAL FOR: DUNBAR MIS 12 13 232 221 21 24 0 92 131 747.....- _-fl\n\u0026gt;~ 71 ~\nr~ ~I 7- 008-FAIR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL ---- 09 0 3 157 150 6 6 0 12 27 362 --- - 10 0 0 130 133 2 2 15 21 305 ll 0 102 89 3 2 0 10 12 220 12 0 0 61 75 0 16 12 171 ---- -- TOTAL FOR: FAIR 1 3 450 447 12 15 4 53 72 1,058 ..-- gq',\" /~'5 - ?.~-'o 009 -FORST HTS MIS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL ------ 06 0 84 84 3 4 0 0 20 24 222 - -- 07 0 92 95 2 0 0 15 24 230 ---- --- - -- 08 2 88 90 2 3 0 0 27 23 236 - -- TOTAL FOR: FORST HTS M/S 2 5 264 269 7 8 0 0 62 71 688.....- 53~ ~~ ')7/. - ---------------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 2 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 010 - PUL HTS M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 06 0 62 58 0 0 46 56 225 07 2 67 65 0 0 0 61 47 244 08 0 74 78 0 0 0 40 45 239 TOTAL FOR: PUL HTS MIS 4 203 2101 2 0 147 148 708 ..,...- .fo CJ\nJ,15 65'7~ 011- SOUTHWSTM IS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL: 06 0 0 66 72 2 2 0 0 5 3 150 07 0 82 72 0 0 3 165 08 0 85 89 0 0 0 0 2 178 TOT AL FOR: SOUTHWST MIS 233 233 7 3 0 0 8 7 493 ........- ~i(.p\na- /-5 9~7. 012-MCCLELLA GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL! 09 0 0 126 146 5 2 0 0 7 II 297 10 0 145 107 2 4 0 2 9 271 11 0 0 82 81 4 2 0 0 6 8 183 12 0 0 77 85 0 0 4 4 174 TOTAL FOR: MCCLELLA 0 430 419 12 11 1 0 19 32 925-- j~9 ~5 ~I 2\n).7,. 013- HENDERSNM /S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 95 IOI 6 0 0 15 10 235 ----- 07 3 64 87 12 0 0 9 7 184 - -~---- 08 92 79 9 12 0 7 9 211 TOTAL FOR: HENDERSN MIS s 2 251 267 17 30 1 0 31 26 630 - - --- . - a-lg- ~-s ~1 ___ 8'3-?. 015-CLOVR M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -\nOTAL] 06 0 0 105 84 18 17 0 3 5 233 07 0 94 105 IS 19 0 0 5 2 241 08 0 99 73 12 14 0 0 8 208 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR MIS 298 262 45 50 0 16 a.i 682 - a\"P ~~ 3'\nt?. COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 3 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 016 - MABEL M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL _I - 06 0 0 95 77 4 2 0 0 14 17 209 07 0 0 73 87 4 0 0 9 17 l9l 08 0 0 88 95 2 4 0 0 20 25 234 ------ - TOTAL FOR: MABEL MIS 0 0 256 259 10 7 0 0 43 59 634 - 815 17 /0 c}-1 81~ f 017 - BALE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 14 17 5 0 0 0 4 2 42 02 0 0 23 16 5 4 0 0 2 51 03 0 0 19 20 3 0 0 2 48 04 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 0 34 05 0 0 20 19 0 0 5 47 K 0 29 21 0 0 2 3 60 p 0 0 20 12 I .\nl,. 0 0 I 3 2 37 ..,l-~ TOTAL FOR: BALE 0 138 124 16 12 10 16 319 - _., ..... ~I ------- .?\\ ~~ \"\"\"'  1018-BRADY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! L - --- Ol 0 18 22 0 0 0 4 47 02 0 0 JO 16 2 0 0 4 2 35 03 0 16 22 4 0 0 3 3 50 04 0 0 22 12 3 0 0 0 2 40 05 0 17 19 0 0 0 4 3 45 - -- - ------ K 0 18 29 3 2 0 0 4 7 64 - p 0 0 13 14 o 0 0 0 0 6 n4 37 ~i? - TOTAL FOR: BRADY I 3 114 134 11 7 0 0 23 25 318 i--- ~..\u0026gt;.r8' ~~ -1? 78\"?. - - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 4 of16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 020 - MCDERMOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL 01 2 0 23 15 4 3 0 0 IO 6 63 02 3 24 22 0 4 0 0 6 65 03 3 0 14 23 2 2 0 0 9 IO 63 04 2 26 18 2 4 0 0 7 8 68 05 0 13 14 2 3 0 0 14 4 51 K 2 2 18 16 3 0 0 9 5 56 p 2 0 16 ~'111 0 2-\"/ 0 0 4 c:. 5 40 ~r1. TOTAL FOR: MCDERMOT 14 5 134 119 11 21 0 0 59 43 406 _- ol'53 BJ/ /oc).J ~\n,. 1021 - CARVER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 2 17 28 0 0 16 16 82 02 20 21 2 0 17 16 80 03 4 15 31 2 0 15 21 91 04 0 0 25 18 3 0 0 II 26 84 OS 25 20 3 0 0 13 22 86 K 0 23 17 0 0 0 18 13 73 TOTAL FOR: CARVER 6 7 125 135 6 9 2 2 90 114 496-- ~Ceo s\n,.... d:}Gi .,g~- 1022 - BASELINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 0 II 20 3 2 0 2 3 44 02 0 0 16 21 3 0 0 0 42 -- --- ------ - 03 0 0 20 19 2 0 0 2 45 ---- ----- 04 0 0 12 16 3 2 0 0 3 2 38 --- ----- --- -- - - 05 0 0 16 17 3 0 0 4 42 ---- K 0 0 17 18 4 0 0 0 41 p 0 0 11\n::\u0026gt; 21 \"' 0 0 3 ~ 2 39 _,7. - - TOT AL FOR: BASELINE 2 0 103 132 13 15 0 I 15 10 291 --- _\ni,~.t\n~, ~-s 8Vo COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 5 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1023 - FAIR PRK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF RM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 2 10 II 0 0 0 0 2 4 29 02 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 2 2 25 03 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 16 04 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 OS 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 3 2 26 K 0 II IO 0 0 0 4 7 34 p 2 15 13 0 3 0 0 0 5 .. 2 38 ,. TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 2 5 67 74 1 0 0 20 17 ~  pl/ Cf ~7 ~7- 1024 - FORST PK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTAL] 01 2 8 2 0 0 0 28 27 69 02 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 22 23 58 03 0 6 7 2 0 0 21 18 56 04 2 6 9 0 0 0 6 18 43 05 6 9 0 0 0 0 8 10 35 K 3 0 0 0 26 27 60 p 2\n)... 0 0 .., 0 0 0 18\n18 40 7- TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 5 9 36 35 3 129 141 -361,,,,..- '11 \u0026lt;f\n..O 6170 ~o? 1025 - FRAl~KLIN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TO~A~] 01 0 0 37 30 0 0 0 0 0 68 02 0 26 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 59 03 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 2 0 54 04 0 22 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 05 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 0 48 K 0 26 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 p 0 0 26~-26 0 0 I 0 57 \"' 7,. - TOTAL FOR: FRANKL! 3 0 181 192 0 0 4 5 387 ....-- ,?73 .tr 1 9c.- ~ ------ COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 6 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1027 - GIBBS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 II 14 2 0 0 0 7 II 45 02 0 2 13 10 0 0 0 8 10 44 03 2 15 10 0 2 0 0 4 11 45 04 0 2 20 15 2 0 0 12 13 65 05 3 19 17 2 0 0 17 II 71 K 2 8 12 0 0 0 3 13 40 -- ------- TOT AL FOR: GIBBS 6 8 86 7 5 7 0 0 51 69 310 ....- /(, ~(, /oiO ~7 jo2s - CHICOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF -w~ ~--T~TAL I 01 0 0 23 33 10 5 0 2 2 76 - -- --------- 02 0 0 29 33 5 11 0 0 3 86 ---- 03 0 0 33 27 6 6 0 0 4 79 - -------- -- 04 0 0 24 26 5 8 0 4 3 71 -- - ----- --- 05 0 0 26 37 7 8 0 0 5 86 K 0 0 26 29 IO 6 0 0 2 6 79 p 0 0 29 ..,4 17 8 3 0 0 0 ~2 59 '78il, TOTAL FOR: CHICOT 0 0 190 202 51 47 2 0 20 24 536 V- ~q ..... /00 -# ~~ jo29 - WEST HIL -- - - -- GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM T-~T~~J ----- - 01 0 0 17 15 0 0 0 3 6 42 - ----- - 02 0 0 22 12 0 0 4 0 40 - --- - - 03 0 0 16 12 2 2 0 0 5 0 37 04 0 0 17 16 0 4 0 0 3 7 47 05 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 3 4 36 K 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 4 4 40 p 0 0 9 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 ~? .. -- --- TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL 0 0 107 99 5 7 0 22 21 262 _.- _:\n,\u0026lt;O~ ~ -t.3 7Q  ----- ---- -- ------- -- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 7 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 030 - JEFFRSN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 0 20 19 60 02 0 0 17 II 0 0 0 IS 16 60 03 I 3 18 0 0 0 25 14 73 04 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 21 21 68 OS 0 0 14 12 0 0 0 21 18 66 K 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 22 22 62 p 0 3 6 2 0 o I 0 0 12 22 40 I TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN 2 77 78 3 0 0 0 136 132 429,,.....--\n-5 t,, e\nP41f .:!Jt. /. 1031 - CLOVR EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 21 31 13 7 0 0 74 02 0 0 18 28 s s 0 0 0 2 58 03 0 0 20 13 6 0 0 2 0 42 04 0 0 17 16 2 4 0 0 2 3 44 05 0 0 17 17 4 4 0 0 0 43 K 0 26 20 4 5 0 0 2 59 p 0 0 19- 13 2 4 ,, 0 0 40 ~ TOTAL FOR: CLOVR EL 0 138 138 36 30 0 0 7 10 360 ,__. c\n).7{, \u0026amp;1 /7 77,7. t2-DODD - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 10 11 3 3 0 0 3 4 34 02 0 0 12 8 4 6 0 0 3 6 39 - --- 03 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 4 6 36 04 0 0 7 13 3 5 0 0 5 8 41 05 0 0 9 8 5 2 0 0 10 3 37 K 0 0 6 10 5 3 0 0 4 9 37 p 0 0 10 ...... 12 23 0 0 8 4 r~~ TOTAL FOR: DODD 0 0 62 79 22 21 0 0 37 40 261 _. 1-1// 1/3 '7-, .i 1- -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 8 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1033 - MEADCLIF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 21 17 3 0 0 2 7 51 02 0 0 14 20 2 2 0 0 2 4 44 03 0 17 18 3 0 0 2 3 45 04 0 0 24 22 2 2 0 0 3 3 56 05 0 23 17 3 0 0 4 4 53 K 0 0 17 27 3 0 0 8 4 60 p 0 0 18a=.11 l _\n0 0 I 3 2 40 ?a TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF 134 138 13 13 0 0 22 27 349 _. ~1G1-- ~'! 9 ?t!,, ~4 - MITCHELL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF TOTAL-I 01 0 0 12 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02 0 0 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 24 03 0 0 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 04 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 23 05 0 0 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 p 0 0 5 13 0 0 (' 0 0 20 7- .. TOT AL FOR: MITCHELL 0 0 79 71 0 0 . 0 2 3 156 -\n~P I ~ 9~?- 1035 - M L KING GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 29 33 0 0 0 0 19 16 100 02 3 26 21 0 0 15 22 90 ------ 03 0 0 22 25 0 0 0 0 17 11 75 04 21 31 0 0 15 13 84 05 3 2 29 21 0 0 0 18 13 87 K 0 2 28 31 0 13 14 91 - p 3 16 c:, 30 0 3 8 17 80 .~?. TOTAL FOR: ML KING 10 10 171 192 6 2 4 105 106 607 ....... ~i?\u0026gt;- 6)~ al/ '-o?o COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 9 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS io36 - ROCKFELR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL L __ 01 0 2 22 22 0 0 0 9 10 66 02 0 28 24 2 0 0 7 8 71 03 0 0 21 20 0 0 6 7 56 04 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 11 4 51 05 0 0 22 12 2 0 0 6 8 51 K 0 0 19 22 0 0 0 6 7 55 p 28 31 4 '7 0 0 19 3rl 18 103 ~,-7. TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 4 158 148 6 9 0 64 62 453 ,._... ~ ~ al /~~ t8'I 037 - GEYER SP GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 20 21 2 2 0 0 47 02 0 0 24 14 0 0 0 41 03 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 4 41 04 0 0 27 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 44 05 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 47 K 0 0 17 15 4 0 0 2 40 p 0 0 18 .\ni. . 17 2 0 ~ 0 0 0 2 39 7- TOTALFOR:GEYERSP 0 0 144 119 10 11 0 0 6 9 299 ...- ~\"'a J ~8' .. 038 - P L HT E GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 12 16 0 0 0 9 7 46 - --- 02 0 2 11 8 0 0 0 0 9 8 38 ------- 03 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 0 12 12 44 04 0 14 II 0 0 0 0 12 10 48 05 12 15 0 0 0 0 12 9 50 --- K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 10 15 40 p 5 ~ 0 0 \"I 0 0 8 4 20 ao?. -- - - .. TOTAL FOR: PUL HT E 3 5 68 72 0 0 0 72 65 286 .....- ,10 '7 r~7 r, t COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 10ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1039 - RIG-HTSEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F M WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 0 26 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 02 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 04 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 05 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 K 0 0 23 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 p 0 0 20 \"20 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 .. /.) TOTAL FOR: RIGHTSEL 0 0 141 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 ..,_., ol,(,:V (0 0 /O?- 1040 - ROMINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 19 17 4 0 0 0 6 47 02 0 0 17 16 3 4 0 0 3 4 47 03 0 0 12 12 2 0 0 3 3 35 04 0 0 17 23 2 2 0 2 48 05 0 14 22 3 0 0 3 47 K 0 0 21 24 8 6 0 0 0 60 p 0 14 - 17 4 (, 0 0 0 0 37 u 7- -- TOTAL FOR: ROMINE 114 131 20 321 '- 2~c/ 0 12 15 ~~6 ~7 76A r \\041- STEPHENS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 39 32 0 0 0 74 ----- 02 0 0 30 39 0 0 (I 0 0 0 69 --- - . 03 0 45 32 2 0 0 3 85 ----- 04 0 0 32 30 0 0 0 0 64 05 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 0 69 K 0 0 37 38 0 0 2 80 ------ - --. p 0 0 286\"1 26 0 oo 0 0 0 4 58 '1 2 ----- - -- TOT AL FOR: STEPHENS 0 241 232 5 5 0 0 7 8 499 _.- -11 ~ // /'5 1~?- ---------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 11 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 042 -WASHNGTN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 32 38 5 5 0 0 4 9 95 02 0 24 35 7 2 0 0 3 5 79 03 0 32 27 2 2 0 0 3 6 73 04 3 26 29 4 7 0 0 7 7 84 05 0 22 34 5 2 0 0 4 3 71 K 2 31 30 0 8 6 81 p 0 2 34 rl 33 2 0 0 0 4 5 80 ~ TOTAL FOR: WASHNGTN 6 10 201 226 26 19 0 33 7:) 563 _., .\n/').7 t,~ ?lJo 1043 - WILLIAMS ---- - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 4 19 16 2 0 0 0 13 13 68 02 4 3 19 15 0 0 0 7 19 68 03 3 3 23 25 0 0 0 20 14 89 04 6 6 22 25 0 0 0 15 13 88 05 2 5 29 18 2 0 II 20 89 K 20 9 0 0 0 12 15 59 - -- TOTAL FOR: WlLLIAMS 20 19 132 108 6 2 2 0 78 94 461 ....- ~ 0 -YQ 17~ ~ , - E4-WILso __ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTALj __] 01 0 0 15 22 2 0 0 0 2 0 41 02 0 0 24 22 2 0 0 0 2 51 -- ------- 03 0 0 15 19 0 0 38 . ------ 04 0 2 13 16 0 0 0 0 33 --- 05 0 0 21 32 0 0 3 59 K 0 0 14 24 2 0 0 43 p 0 0 7 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 O 20 l- - . - . ---- TOTAL FOR: WILSO 0 2 109 146 8 4 2 0 6 8 285 - ~5S /~ /7 S: ~ ------------ - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVJCES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 12 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1045 - WOODRUFF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 0 37 02 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 4 3 33 03 0 0 18 15 0 0 0 2 37 04 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 28 OS 0 0 IS 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 K 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 36 p 0 0 15 520 0 0 0 0 0 39 -- .  -~ ....... TOTAL FOR: WOODRUFF 0 0 107 108 0 0 8 10 ~/0 _\ni- 'g- C, ?- 1046 - MABEL EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~ TOTAL I 01 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 5 3 35 02 0 16 17 0 0 0 2 2 39 03 0 0 14 12 0 2 0 0 4 33 04 0 0 21 11 0 0 2 0 36 05 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 3 6 40 K 0 14 13 3 0 0 0 2 38 p 0 0 13 al 18 2 1 :a 0 0 I\n), I 36 .I?. TOTAL FOR: MABEL EL 94 111 8 4 1 0 16 21 257 ,_. ~c5 15 ~1 ~(!) - 1047-TERRY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTALI 01 6 28 34 2 0 0 16 15 103 02 7 3 27 25 7 0 0 0 14 14 97 03 6 24 24 2 4 0 0 16 10 87 04 3 2 18 18 0 3 0 0 13 17 74 05 3 18 20 6 2 0 0 I 5 15 80 K 6 3 24 29 4 2 0 0 14 14 96 p 2 3 12 I 6 0 ' I 0 0 8 /l. 8 40~?.. TOTAL FOR: TERRY 28 19 151 156 21 13 0 0 96 93 577 ...-- ~o1 ~, /?SJ ~\"\nl7. -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 13 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1048 - FULBRIGH GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF W\n~ TOTAL\\ 01 2 14 0 2 2 0 27 37 88 02 0 14 16 2 0 0 0 23 24 80 03 0 4 13 2 0 0 0 37 37 94 04 0 0 12 IO 0 0 18 36 78 05 4 0 14 18 0 0 19 26 83 K 3 15 3 0 0 34 33 91 p 0 3 'l 5 0 1 _\n)- 0 0 13':, 17 40 .., TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH 7 7 65 7 7 5 3 0 171 210 554 ,.......- J.)./ ~1 $' ~ll- \\oso - OTTER CR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~OTALI 01 3 0 15 24 5 3 17 12 81 ----- 02 0 30 25 3 2 0 0 14 15 90 03 0 0 20 27 0 0 0 0 9 12 68 ----- 04 0 0 23 23 3 0 0 0 12 IO 71 05 0 33 21 2 0 0 10 I 3 81 K 0 0 26 25 4 14 8 80 p 0 0 14 \"' 8 1 \" 0 0 10 ,I 6 40 ?- TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 3 2 161 153 14 12 2 2 86 76 511V' _a5 /~~ (,I l \\os1 - W AKEFIEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 23 30 9 7 0 0 0 71 02 0 0 24 32 6 10 0 0 2 0 74 03 0 0 17 26 4 2 0 0 0 50 ---- 04 0 0 32 30 8 7 0 0 2 80 ------ 05 0 0 25 23 3 3 0 0 0 2 56 K 0 0 29 33 6 IO 0 0 2 0 80 - -- -- p 0 0 14 ...,a15 4 7 I I 0 0 0 I) O -~..,\n,? .. ------ - TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 0 0 164 189 40 46 0 0 6 6 451-- ~~3 s\"' I~ 1%1 --- --- ---------- COMPUTER INFORJv!ATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 14 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 052-WATSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F 'M WF WM TOTAL OJ 0 0 28 44 0 0 0 0 2 75 02 0 31 41 0 0 0 0 75 03 0 0 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 04 0 0 25 35 0 0 0 0 62 OS 0 0 32 28 0 0 0 63 K 0 0 35 41 0 0 0 2 80 p 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 I I o 40 ~\n2. - - TOTAL FOR: WATSON 0 I 202 237 4 0 0 6 5 456...,.. -19-q ~ I/ ~?- \\ns-AGE CY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 6 13 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 8 03 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 13 04 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 12 OS 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 9 06 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 JO 07 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 ----- 08 0 0 5 II 0 0 0 0 4 3 23 09 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 2 5 21 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 16 - - -- ------------ 11 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 -- - - --- K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 -------- --- -- TOT AL FOR: AGE CY 2 0 25 47 0 0 0 2 34 38 148 ..... 1~ 3/ 7:\n)..\n. . COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 15 ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENTR EPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1766-ALC GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 07 0 0 7 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 8'~ 08 0 0 117126 0 0 0 0 0 l (_, l 39 ~~?. ~ 09 0 0 22 67 0 0 0 0 3 93 10 0 14 25 0 0 0 3 45 11 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 0 2 31 12 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 TOT AL FOR: ALC 0 70 ~J 0 0 0 5 13 261 178' J/..,\n)..\n}~ '9\n/ 1767-ACC L~ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL\\ j 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 14 16 0 0 0 3 35 12 0 37 37 2 0 0 0 2 11 90 -- TOT AL FOR: ACC LP 0 58 54 4 0 4 1 0 3 ,iJS 1361,1\"\"' I ~ 'R\nl, GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 25,868 - A.\nJ-\"rl \u0026lt;!., ~ 0 \" ,. ~rf{ ..J ~\n1.6 '8'a~/ t13 ~, ~o~J ~~, ,\no .,.l~O \u0026lt;zs\u0026amp;c\n\\9 {.,J./7 ~~ ~,~t,. 17\nl53 1,~10 l,~ 7\n:::. ~ 7 (~) ( (w (1 ?7~ COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 16ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 LRSD ENROLLMENT REPORT W /0 METRO FINAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM 01 27 14 649 729 78 47 8 2 245 273 02 19 22 678 684 67 59 2 2 229 243 03 15 20 620 660 45 50 3 266 234 04 16 21 638 645 46 61 6 2 216 251 05 22 17 662 671 54 51 2 242 236 - 06 10 12 679 635 51 40 2 0 208 208 07 13 15 656 656 37 48 0 0 200 204 08 18 12 699 667 39 50 2 205 2 II 09 20 17 812 856 43 53 4 270 269 10 10 16 672 597 42 40 6 3 209 248 II 16 21 521 503 27 23 3 2 236 215 12 9 14 449 _!34 23 26 193 K 19 17 656 682 63 63 3 4 250 266 p l3 l2 45811~57 28 36 q\n.,, 2 13~~ '.53 GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 (-:f\n)') {D) (wJ i:le ,-,-) g) 1 1)037 ,,,3,\n9~ (771 ----- LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 TOTAL I 2072 2005 1914 1902 1958 1845 1829 1904 2345 1843 1567 1365 2023 [296 7'1- 25,868 (. T /~, 110 lo S' (o ?\no 7\n:\nJ.-- te, 8\"~ l,\n,,l.l )) \\ 707/ ~5 ?\nJ.o l9~ Page 1 of! LEA: 6002050 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 1 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F M BLACK F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 581 81 61 171 241 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 551 101 51 141 241 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 541 101 81 191 141 11 11 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 591 91 81 181 231 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 571 91 81 201 191 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 421 51 41 191 141 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---\n) CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 0 r,: t!- ~--------+~I-+ __ ./+-- ++--2+-- C: +-- o +-- t'?+-- o+-- o+-- o+-----+---- ENRoLLI 3251 511 391 1071 1181 51 '- 41 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ~/5 -% 11./ /_:\nV / C\u0026gt; c\u0026gt; 7\u0026lt;? ~::5 / LEA: 6002053 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BELWOODE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 2 4 I 3 I 1 I 9 I 10 I 11 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 291 61 41 111 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 281 31 41 101 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 241 51 11 61 91 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 23 I 2 I 3 I 5 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 171 21 21 Bl 41 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I O I ~ 0 I 0 I oi O I 0 I ~ O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+----+-----+~---+-----+~----+-----+--2--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1451 211 151 491 551 31 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 5 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONEP ARK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 72 I 2 I 2 I 28 I 331 71 0 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 721 11 01 341 361 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 01 01 361 251 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 561 21 01 211 321 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 571 21 01 271 261 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 671 01 11 331 321 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3861 71 31 1791 1841 91 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- --:R, 1\u0026lt; d .?- _\ni .5(/~ ~ I 0 0 C' 0 ~~I -\nJ,Y-0 ? 5 ,\n?o3 ~o1 I/ 5 c\n..\u0026gt; (!_-. e:-, 0 9~?0 1! _,\n10 /',, LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 7 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: CRESTWOODEL EMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 791 301 201 111 171 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 101 51 51 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 511 161 191 71 91 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 571 221 191 121 31 01 01 01 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 751 281 261 131 71 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 651 241 251 41 81 21 01 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 491 201 151 31 101 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 0 I O I 0 I O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+ r +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- cHoicE I 0 I 0 I {/f 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I (1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-- -+-----~---+-----+m--+-----+-~---+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL1 3761 1401 1241 501 541 41 11 11 01 21 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 121 61 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ' -ne-J\u0026lt; --\n::\nJ g./lo LEA: 6002056 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 9 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 321 2 I 2 I 71 20 I OI OI OI OI OI 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 191 11 31 51 91 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 181 01 01 81 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 291 61 31 121 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 321 21 2 I 15 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 321 21 11 121 161 01 01 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1621 131 111 591 761 11 01 01 01 01 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /7 0 / ? g 0 r C\u0026gt; C, r, f-\"\") /77 /3 /__\n2 ~7 g~ I e:\u0026gt; c) D 0 ._S)._, _.\nA9 /9/ a LEA: 6002057 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 751 281 301 71 81 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 201 91 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 94 I 38 I 33 I 71 141 11 11 0 I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 921 301 331 151 121 01 11 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 821 291 301 81 101 21 11 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 881 311 321 71 151 01 01 11 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 771 311 281 101 51 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01,.,_1~01 Old~ 01 01 l1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+- .I!-----+' --+-----+-----+-----+-- --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- \"b1- ENROLLI 5081 1871 1861 541 641 61 41 21 51 01 0 ~ ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7' CHOICE I 251 141 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002058 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 13 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOEDL EMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 591 161 251 41 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 51 11 41 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 641 161 271 71 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 221 231 61 91 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 691 171 281 121 101 01 21 01 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 561 191 121 91 111 11 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 511 201 141 101 61 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O ll'l1i O I O I O~ 0 I O I J~ 0 I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---r+-----+~----+-----+1----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3611 1101 1291 481 581 61 91 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 71 11 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002059 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OI 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 6801 1161 1101 2011 2141 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~(,01 01,l)lt 01 01 ~ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+~ ---+-----+~----+-----+:\u0026gt; --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 6811 1161 1101 2011 2151 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 17 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 50 I 2 I 4 I 22 I 22 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 551 41 31 251 221 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 551 71 01 23 I 241 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 471 11 41 201 221 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 41 41 281 30! 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 55 I 1 I 5 I 22 I 27 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 Oi 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 330! 191 201 1401 1471 21 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r // c\n. 0 / 0 0 0 LEA: 6002061 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 19 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: MEADOWPA RK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 331 4 I 11 151 131 0 I OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 261 21 11 121 91 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 281 21 31 111 121 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI ~91 31 41 161 251 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 311 31 31 101 131 01 01 11 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 281 21 21 141 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~Q 01 01 (LOOI 01 6 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-- 1-----+l:!.---+-----+J----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /')_,,1- ENROLL! 1951 161 141 781 821 21 11 11 11 01 0 l::,\n, ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARYSC HOOL PAGE: 21 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F I M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 811 13 I 10 I 2 9 I 16 I 6 I 7 I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 761 91 91 171 261 111 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 611 91 31 201 181 31 81 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 611 111 31 201 201 51 21 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 31 131 211 171 61 BJ 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 821 191 71 201 231 71 61 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 8 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ 01 01 OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 4291 641 451 1271 1201 381 351 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ? .:5 7 0 LEA: 6002064 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 23 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! M WHITE BLACK F M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 65! 161 131 141 121 61 21 01 01 11 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 571 121 121 141 151 21 11 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 45! 91 161 111 61 01 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 49! 141 91 101 101 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 551 121 61 171 171 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 501 111 41 141 151 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 0I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- OB ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 'l 0 I 0 I ? 0 I 0 I -? .,/ 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+--v-+-----+t~---+-----+i----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3211 741 601 801 751 181 111 01 01 11 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002065 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 25 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 761 81 121 271 251 01 21 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 851 81 91 391 271 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 681 161 71 241 131 41 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 461 111 71 101 141 11 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 471 71 51 201 141 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 551 51 51 201 211 31 01 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--- -+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I of) 0 I O I ,.f,,,\n0 I O I .\n~O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---\nf-+-----+J----+-----+~~--+-----+-C--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3771 551 451 1401 1141 101 81 31 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 01 31 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 27 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODPR E-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7 9 71 0 0 0 !I -n.,I\u0026lt; ,,,.,. ~,._/ !'ft J .. LEA: 6002069 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL PAGE: 29 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 601 01 01 261 321 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 621 11 01 291 311 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 421 01 01 231 191 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 511 11 01 251 251 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 511 01 01 231 281 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 481 01 01 211 261 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3151 21 01 1481 1611 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- :5?0 G- 0 9 // C C (') 0 C'\u0026gt; :\n\u0026gt;~ ~ 1~7 /7~ -~ } r r\u0026gt; 0 _: ~:)7 .i/ LEA: 6002070 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 31 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOMD IDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Oi 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Oj 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 3751 1211 1121 701 651 21 Si 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 3481 1071 1111 621 641 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l-.\nl----~l~~~l---_-~~l l-.-2-~-~~l~--l---~-l~--lJ--l~ l----~+---- l,7. ENROLL! 7231 2281 2231 1321 1291 Si 61 01 01 01 0 - ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 33 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS PAGE: 34 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7191 1261 1551 2361 1761 121 101 21 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 7111 1381 1531 2171 1771 121 91 41 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---~~~=~~l--v\"\"'~l----~l~1~l----~l~1-~l----~l2~~l----~l----~~,.1,  ENROLLI 1431 I 264 I 308 I 454 I 353 I 241 19 I 6 I 3 I OI 0 ti\" ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 11 21 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002076 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WESTC AMPUS PAGE: 36 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEI I TOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 441 41 11 201 171 01 01 21 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 1091 161 51 511 321 11 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 121 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l---)l----~l?..~~~l----~!tr~~-~l----~l:11\u0026gt;--~l----~l----~fl\"'7, ~~~~~~l-==~=l--===l--=~~l--=~~l--==~l---==l---==l----=CHOICEI 41 01 01 41 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002077 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 37 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F M BLACK F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 131 31 01 81 21 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 1061 101 51 411 491 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 1021 91 41 441 451 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 2221 221 91 941 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002077 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL PAGE: 38 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLL! 31 01 01 31 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I OI OI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I ~ \\ 0 I 0 I J~~ 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I ---------+--v-+-----+~---+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 2251 221 91 971 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 39 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: RIDGEROADC HARTERM IDDLE SCHOO JGRADEI JTOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ JAM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 2311 311 231 881 781 51 51 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 2801 211 251 991 1091 131 111 11 OJ 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+---r-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 001 OJ~\n, 01 01 2:.1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+---./-+-----+1----+-----+9----+-----+7-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 5111 521 481 1871 1871 181 161 21 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y DISTRICT SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi I TOTAL I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M F M BLACK F I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 7641 1321 1261 2161 2431 271 141 21 01 11 3 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 371 161 191 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 7451 1241 1251 2211 2411 191 131 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 6721 1301 1161 2181 1761 101 181 21 11 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 6971 1371 1231 1911 2151 161 131 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 6991 118 I 1131 206 I 225 I 15 I 141 4 I 3 I 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 6541 1181 881 2071 2091 201 101 01 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 6951 1191 1101 2111 2161 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 7121 1621 1401 1991 1921 81 101 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 7301 1371 1401 2051 2181 161 121 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 63681 11771 10811 18741 19351 1491 1191 121 111 51 5 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 501 231 221 31 11 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY DISTRICT COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 2 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi ITOTALI ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M BLACK I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7661 1301 1561 2591 1931 121 101 41 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 820 I 154 I 158 I 268 I 2091 131 131 4 I 11 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 01 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 12 I 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 91101 17361 16771 26741 26221 1951 1531 211 181 71 7 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 581 231 231 91 21 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--jOf-+-----+--rr-+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- -r\np..,. J,) .... ,..,  11 \u0026amp;'b .q l' 7\"' 31P/1 ~ ~ 1:5 C? 0 0 0 1~ Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ~ --1 ~.i/5! - .a / o7,,. 9-v1C::-r ,.. ~ ?(,, ..,~ ,\nrn I\n, '\u0026gt;\u0026lt;' ,\nJ. / I~ 7 7 A~ 7o ******************************************************************************** ~ f NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002050 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 211 41 41 71 61 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt455 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 541 21 21 241 231 21 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002056 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 5 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 171 01 11 81 81 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENBT Y SCHOOL PAGE: 9 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 21 01 11 I 61 01 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 411 41 31 121 81 51 91 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 14 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODP RE-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 2131 71 91 991 871 71 41 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002069 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 01 01 91 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r 0 C') _ .. C2 :a :-c: Set.cc: :-o:. 54 ::02 C:-ysc.a: r:1.:: :\"lag::.e: z:em ?K K School :-oc ocs 3ay::n.:. -1ec:::: c:eme!:tar~ K Sc::.ccl :-::~ K 24 ,8 26 23 ,5 30 19.1 :o ,o :c 35 22 30 3:\n: :s 29 208 :as !.2 :o 54 5 5 35 5) !.S 32 32 32 20 23 :s :a 23 23 :s 29 25 42 32 36 :5 :so 9 :2 - - ~e 1c6 -P'6 -- -I SC 35 s 3- 29 25 26 :a 23 :9 :as - 19 :.3 11 # 1:: 33 24 2G 29 33 ,, ?fr?) :!.\"'3 ,, :2 ~\\ 43 1 p ,~ .\n-l :s 2 C 2 s 5 0 4\n: C.o 0 JS 4:\n: 26 3- ,5 ,6 ./ 235 ..... 52. 2-t \\ :ss 5\nEO ~1 ' :.22 1:5 :cs 1:2 95 9- 95 S:4 -54 61 48 4E 63 59 65 70 -2 63 ...,.... 3 93 24 26 24 33 42 49 48 --, 2E\\v ,-, 66\\ 49 ,H 50 74\\ \u0026lt;, 33\\- K PK K !?K K Sc::cc:. Tot :-c.:. :r:c:.ud.:.ng PK Schee::. '!'c,:.. 'rot :::c~'.lC:.r:g ?K School :'oc . !.3 ,\nacks:mv:::e ::::::.ement.:i.r:1 3 13 11 57 13 10 9 14 aG 78 55 2E 26 24 29 21 25 o'I. 13 10 ::..1 16 205 16 13 23 16 18 12 34 10 6 5 11 7 10 5\" 50 20 21 22 n 15 d-.,Y:20 Sc ::.i. 20 11 83 55 55 sa 158 32 24 20 2- 20 24 13 20 :.12 12 5 :3 ::.a 28 24 14 23 12:\n~I ::..s 20 13 16 79 43 51 14 6 14 :o 8 l\" :..o 14 :\n_7 18 19 !.C 9 101 20 :.s :s 60 EJ () 55 53 71 36 40 56 242 252 735\"\"\" 38 44 JS 34 27 28 242  206 51 52 54 56 3 c 3 .....- 54. :.si : 9 :::\nil 7., -a 54 54 34 79 a- 545 V 526 55 91% 4.5.85% 16 50% ,c 2 5 %- 48 26% ?K K 60 62 :o 3: :2 !.'.) -- 1: !.S 62 JS (l a'i \\\\le oC s 5 5 4 ze a 7 ~5 25 :5 :a 9 31 :. s (I 2: :2 6 0 2\n/t 52 ,a 4c 48 50 50 4C 53 :\nos.,...\ns ,a 43 4- 35 4\" ~as  -5 54 5.\n4'J .\n6\n: ::: :\n:a::ec::: #1- .:\n56'  ,, :s, 20 2:1 V ~~7-- 25.5:\\.,,,,,. 74. 3 S \\ '.7i7~ 1\n- . :4 _., o: : 5 ?:.. K ?!\u0026lt; 22 :s SC~OC..1. Toe. s, :o 30 13 56 36 23 ~1:::- :: .-i.\n..:.z ='='.:-1.\n:..z :. 9 :a 63 50 .\ns ,2 39 2Z3 :a :s 42 :.J 53  59 50 52 \"= ZO\\: V 7- 38 SC\\ 6: SC% oo Jat ...., 69 92 \\ ,,. 95\\ 59 05% 56 95\\ .. __ a:t .,,.., ?K 55 6J 59 20 20 34 23 3C 2: 1 6 :s 45 55 6'J 53 s::: 26 3C :a :9 :.s 96 cs 239 2S 25 20 22 :s 69 2J-t 50 6J :s : 0 {6 _, 26 L, 66 53 62 -J sa s:. 63 55 E: 3-.\n, ...... 259 305 ... CSO V 71 :6.6H -2 ~\u0026lt;\u0026gt;/- :n ::J :~s :. as 5-i2 V 5,C 69 56 63\n7\\ 4- 5: t ?K K ... c!:co_ ':I- - ..... a:. c4 3C 43 30 JS J (I 24 :se 35 35 _6! ,2 :s :s -6 66 49 JS .\n3 89 34 0.3 52 ... 66 0 I 59 o- ES a, 58 15 :s 4 3 2C 69 55 204 )40 062 :_4 S 53 sa 3-:, ? . .:..,:\n::\nsa \u0026amp;ct sa S4\\ 55 ......, 44 40\\ 63 32\\: ,o\nst :s /t'rr\"  tj ! ( ~.f.t, .d-'('ot- 0 I , /4r:?-- A ~,9.J.// --r..,I:. , 32\n: 9\n:3 :E :5 2J 25 :.2 9 #9t/ -::t\ns\n). '5~ ~1\n.,,,1 -1{90~ -t~ ~ 93 !?9 as 96 550 io17? ~I~/ ~7?-. ...y'\ne . ' 286 266 2cz: 259 :ss ?K 455 39:Z 3 94 364 440 29 2.\n:c 0 32 28 3:. 13 :a J' 2 ! 42 5 :352 138~ :320 lG435 :.3449 4l 56% 60 39% 50 95\\ ~ L\\\\I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT October 22, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 ( 501) 490-2000 Attached is the October 1, 2004, enrollment counts for Pulaski County Special School District and the 2004-2005 School Profiles. Guidelines for racial balance for the 2004-2005 school year are: 20-50% at the elementary level and 20-54% at the secondary level. Pre-K enrollment is not included in the elementary racial balance guidelines. Sincerely, Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Dr. Don Henderson, Superintendent of Education Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity and Pupil Services Sam Jones, Attorney PulaskCi ountyS peciaSl chooDl istrict Equity and Pupil Services Date: To: Fax:: Re: - - -- --  .   -  -- --- - - 925 E. Dixon Rd/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-6215 (501) 490- 1352 Fax FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET rJ O( ) Q. rh-- k r J_ /\n2 () 0 l-/ 3'71-0100 Sender: 'r' c.. )e__ .. YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 1 [ PAGE (S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU T MESSAGE: DO NOT RECEIVE AU THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (501) 490-6215. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 925 East Dixon Road/P.o Box 8601 little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith\n(501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecphto foorl. RobinsonH igh School, RobinsonM iddle Schoola nd North , Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increasedt he building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the fsrcohmo o1l 0d5u0ri tnog 1th0e6 0s.u mmer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity Sincerely, Vi\u0026gt; A,,,,_)._,__ B,-,vt~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services Jar.nes Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services SUMMARY OF BUILDING CA?AC!11ES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 200s PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003) l I '  SCHOOL CAPACITY ' RE.COMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOi.. CAPACITY ' I ENROLLMENT\"! (jAN, 7, 2003 SHEET), (A?RIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS ' I I I I JA.CKSONVILLE HIGH (10-12) ' 825 I 1,025 I 1,360 (FOR S-12) 1,127 i I MILLS HIGH ' 908 I 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH ' 626 I 900 I ,.ese I /Of\u0026amp;.0 OAK GROVE HIGH (M2) I 795 I 935 1,130 - I (FOR 9-12) I 537 I ,/ ROSINSON HIGH I :i94 I 556 I\ni:\ne '1 ii) 8.3 D u, , SYLVAN HILLS HIGH I 1,055 998 ! i,120 fDI'\"' I I I ! i MIDDl..E/JR. HIGHS I I ! I I I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 : 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSOIIIVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 1 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 1,030 - ROBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 569 ~r,[) __ SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE I 901 925 I 1,080 ' I I I ,\n,,\nI i:::LEMENTARY I I / I I I ADKINS ' I 216 I 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE I 347 I ~o I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 428 BATES I 612 I aoo I 863 BAYOU METO I 460 I 660 I 697 CATO 367 II 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 I 340 439 CRYSTAL rilLL I 757 I 620 I 870 DUPREE I 310 : 465 498 HARRIS I 175 : 52.5 I 906 JACKSONVILLE 457 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 I n, LAWSON 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE 385 i -476 I 626 I OAl\u0026lt;9RODKE I 309 I 500 553 PINE FORR.=sr ' 505 I 556 554 PINE'NOOD 410 I 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 450 I 544 1scon 108 I 280 I 294 $~:~WOOD I 355 I 460 I 561 SYLVAN HILLS 393 i 456 606 ,, 348 450 j 566 / T/l.Y_QR 570 I 561 _,::.. 10LESON I 342 I ,,r. - I I I ,,, 7 !:\nN?.OL.LMEN\nlN:--ORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUAR~R 2002-Z003 ~ROLLMENT :\u0026gt;A7E.0 MAR'.::rl 2\"\\, 2D03 :\nAGE 02 SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmEs AND ENROLLMENTS ! Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003} ' SCHOOL CAPACl1Y 1 RECOMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOL CAPACJTY !ENROLLMENT\" (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL. 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I I JACKSONVIUE HIGH (1012) 1 826 I 1.025 1.360 (FORS-12) I 1,127 ' I MILLS HIGH 908 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH I 826 I 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712) I 795 935 I 1.130 (FOR S-12) 537 I  I RO6INSON HIGH I 594 556 ! 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1.055 998 I 1,120 I I I MIDDLE/JR. HIGHS I I I I ' I FULLER MJDDLE ! 664 I 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLt\nJR. {6-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 I 1,030 R.OBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 650 SYLV..o.NH ILLS MIDDLE I 901 I 925 I 1.080 I I I I I ELEMENTARY ' I I I I I ADKJNS . I 216 I 370 I 526 ' ARNOLD DRfVE I 347 I 420 I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 I 428 BATES I 612 I 800 I 863 BAYOU METO 460 I 660 l 697 CATO I 367 ! 576 I 800 CLINTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGES i ATION I 212 I 340 I 43S CRYSTA l HILL I 757 I' 820 I 870 DUPREE I 310 I 465 I 498 HARRIS I 175 I 525 I 906 JACKSONVILLE I 467 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 ! 711 LAWSON I 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE I 385 ' 476 I 626 OAKBROOK!:: 309 ! 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 I 556 I 554 PINEWOOD I 410 i 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 ' 450 I 544- SCOTT I 108 I 280 I 294 SKE:RWOOD I 355 I 460 i 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 456 : 606 TAYLOR 348 I 450 I 566 TOLLESON I 342 I 570 ' 561 I I ! I : ITENROL.L.M:=1N I NFO?..M~.noN BASED oN 3RD ouAR-:-ER I \\ 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAR.CH 21, 2003 I fl -r.\n-~ ~~ ~- ~//.4\":J - - /d,\u0026gt;-.J /~ /$0. (5 /7.,/4 -\n:\u0026gt; -0: %: Gf .\n)- ~f Z_  __\ns,A,l{ ) - ~.- \"-1/ ( ,Yf 0- C,,diJ() ~r7 ~0/Y) ~~u /~9~2 ~~ AJJ._l(_~v . ~-=\u0026lt;. 4' //2~-~ /4/S0 -a- ~~ -=5ff2 ?:9--, t-'Abt. tl:.'./t:14 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock,A R 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 (501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecpht ofoorl. Robinson High Schoo/, Robinson Middle School and North  Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increased the building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the school during the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity from 1050 to 1060. Sincerely, (6 ~)_l_- BuvV!~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services James Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services ~'-'!UJ. I y t-'Ut-' J.L ::,t.KV J.\\..,t. n.,:::,::,v t-'LAN DDPT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACTTlES AND ENROLLMENTS Revised May 2. 200~ PULASK1 COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (APRIL 28. 2003) I SCHOOL CAPACITY RECOMMENDl:D 20022003 I INFORMATION SCHOOi. CAPACITY ENROLLMENT\"' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I JACKSONVILLE HIGH {10-12) 825 1,025 1.360 (FOR .9-12) 1,127 MILlSHIGH 908 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712} 795 935 1,130 (FOR 9-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH ~94 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,056 998 1,120 MIDDJ...E/JRH. IGHS FULL.ER MIDDLE I 664  I 945 1.360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8--9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 643 I 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE: I 651 964 1,030 ROBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I I ELEMENTARY I ADKINS ' 216 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 aoo 863 BAYOU METO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 833 T 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE I 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LO.NDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON I 242 325 sn OAK GROVE I 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 556 554 PINEWOOD ' 410 I 523 I o77 ROBINSON I 387 I 450 544 SCOTT I 108 I 280 294 SHERWOOD I 355 I 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 i 456 I 606 450 566 TAYLOR 348 570 561 TOLLESON I 342 I \"ENROLLMENT INFORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ~ROLLMENT DATED tMRCH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 04/04 PAGE 02 _...,...,' ...-. , ...,..., C:.l\u0026gt;!UJ. I 'i l'\"'Ut\"' lL ::it.t-\u0026lt;V 1\\.-t. ,--._\n~.L) P!...AN DDFT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I {APRIL 28. 2003) I '. SCHOOL CAPACl1Y RECOMMENDED 2002-2003 I INFORMATION SCHOOL CAPACITY I ENROLLMENT*' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHE:ETJ I (APRIL 28. 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I JACKSONVILLE HIGH (1012) 1 826 1.025 1.360 (FOR 9-12) 1,127 MILLS HIGH 908 ' 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1.050 OAK GROVE HIGH (7-12) 795 935 1,130 (FOR S-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH 594 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,055 998 1,120 I MIDDLE/JR. HIGrlS I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 I 945 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR.. {8-9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE 651 964 1,030 ~OBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I ELEMENTARY ADKINS  I 216 370 I 526 ' ARNOI..D DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 800 863 BAYOUMETO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 800 CLINTON i 615 833 840 COLLEGE STATION 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LANDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON 242 325 372 OAK GROVE 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST 505 556 554 PINEWOOD I 410 523 677 ROBINSON 387 450 544 SCOTT 108 I 280 294 SKE'.RWOOD 355 i 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 I 456 606 TAYLOR 348 450 566 TOLLESON I 342 570 561 ' ! \"ENROLLMENT !NFORMAnON BASE:D ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAF{CH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 03/04 PAG:: 02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1090","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1090"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["85 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda OCT ? ~UU't OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION foONITORfNG Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting OCTOBER 2004 RECEIVED OCT 2 , 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION r, ONITORING ,... n-,:, .\u0026gt;\n,m:J r- rr..-. :-11: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\n,::, C: -z\n,::,n o-\u0026lt; r- i5 r-z nu, ~ !\"' n ::::\n!='~ r- z\n,::, u, n\n,::, -\u0026lt; m \u0026gt;~ !ll u, I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING October 28, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 111. A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Parkview Madrigals REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners In Education - New Partnerships Franklin Elementary- Ethel Dunbar and Carolyn Gray Fellowship Bible Church - Ray Williams Pulaski Heights Middle School - Dan Whitehorn Arkansas Department of Health - Maria Jones McClellan Magnet High School - Larry Buck and Carol Overton Gifts in Kind - Little Rock - Pamela Boles C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update ,.. n.., .\u0026gt;\nma ,,-- ,_.... :i: Oz o\u0026gt; El~ m..,\na C: -z\nan o,--i\u0026lt;5 r-z C')V, ~ .\u0026gt; ~.., \"'O .C.,:\n..a.. :-'!!! n::a :::im \u0026gt;n .... 8 Oz z=I \"'o z \"' Regular Board Meeting October 28, 2004 Page 2 V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes - Regular Meeting: 09-23-04 - Special Meeting: 10-14-04 SCHOOL SERVICES A. Second Reading: Policy JIH - Student Searches HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property 8. Financial Report CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions EMPLOYEE HEARINGS ADJOURNMENT 0-0 \u0026gt; ,m:, r,..-. r_-\u0026lt; E Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m..,\nx, C: -z\nx,O o-\u0026lt; r- l5 r-z 0 V, ~ ~\n= m-o 1\n:x, og Em me - C: ~~ cS ~\nx,::1 ~m z\nx, 0 V, m- \u0026gt;~ i,, c3 -Co:\n..x.., ~5!? o\nx, :::im \u0026gt;o -\u0026lt;8 Oz Z:::i V, 0 z V, I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/ PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. err ATIONS C. CITIZENS REMARKS 0. LRCTA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Franklin Elementary and Fellowship Bible Church Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health McClellan Magnet High School and Gifts in Kind-Little Rock PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Director !I' !!l C: 0 m ~ \u0026gt; gi ci z !C m .z.. . fl a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m !=' (\") 0z Ill ,X,. ~ X Franklin Elementary School \u0026amp; Fellowship Bible Church Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Fellowship Bible Church will: l. Complete facility and campus projects as prioritized by Franklin Elementary School for ShareFest 2004. 2. Seek to provide at least 30 STEP Encouragers. 3. Provide a teacher appreciation event to support and encourage the faculty and staff. 4. Partner with the PTA to strengthen and encourage increased parental involvement. 5. Provide speakers and support to student recognition events. Franklin Elementary School will: 1. Make available selected student art for display at Fellowship Bible Church. 2. Recognize Fellowship Bible Church as a Partner-in-Education in monthly school newsletters and at school functions. 3. Provide promotion and facility for parent life skills classes. 4. Enlist interested students to correspond with Fellowship selected International Partners. Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Pulaski Heights Middle School will:  Provide artwork for the Arkansas Department of Health employee break room  Provide use of its facility for functions/ceremonies  Participate in the annual Christmas program  Allow its Spanish students to participate in Christmas caroling at the Department Arkansas Department of Health will:  Provide tutors for PHMS' after school program  Allow students enrolled in Career Orientation to job shadow employees  Organize a school supply drive for students that need supplies !I' !!l C: C .~....  g: iz5 I: zm ..... ~ n 0 z V, McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT GIFIS AND KIND will provide on-going:  Supplies for families of McClellan students in need.  Incentives for volunteers promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Incentives for outstanding student performance at the nine weeks for McClellan to motivate students to achieve high standards.  Door-prizes for the PTSA meetings to get parents involved in promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Service-learning/community service opportunities for students to promote student achievement at McClellan. MCCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL will provide:  Free community education multimedia classes for two Gifts in Kind employees (if the class makes).  Inclusion of Gifts in Kind in McClellan's volunteer resource book.  Desktop Publishing services to Gifts in Kind.  Recognition at PTSA meetings for Gifts in Kind.  Recognition in the yearbook for Gifts in Kind.  Multimedia services for Gifts in Kind.  Students for community service/service learning opportunities for McClellan clubs and organizations at Gifts in Kind. 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: BACKGROUND: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools NCLB 2004 Update Junious Babbs The federal \"No Child Left Behind\" (NCLB} Act promotes educational choice by offering parents in low performing schools the opportunity to transfer to another school. LRSD has now completed the third year of implementation for this choice option. Attached report information notes 2004-05 results and provides a three year comparison since the 2002-03 school year. Request to void 6 approved NCLB transfers were received from parents. All request were granted and changes are reflected in the charts below. LRSD NCLB APPLICATION SUMMARY - OCTOBER 2004 APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY SENDING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Bale 1 Baseline 4 Brady 5 Chicot 3 Cloverdale Elem. 5 Fair Park 2 Franklin 4 Kinq 1 Mitchell 1 Rockefeller 5 Stephens 3 Wakefield 3 Washinqton 1 Watson 8 Wilson 5 Woodruff 4 TOTAL 55 :c::\na \u0026gt;- o~ ~~ ~! (/J ..... f\u0026gt; ti! C: C C) !!l C: ~ m m\na (/J !=' n 0 z !!l rn ~ C ::\n0 ~\na m \"C 0 :l APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY RECEIVING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Dodd 6 Geyer Springs 1 Mabe Iva le 5 Meadowcliff 1 Otter Creek 5 Romine 5 Western Hills 5 Forest Park 3 Fulbright 3 Jefferson 4 McDermott 6 Pulaski Heights 6 Rightsell 4 Terry 1 TOTAL 55 Applications Mailed 9-24-04 4364 students eligible for transfer (Bale, Baseline, Brady, Chicot, Cloverdale, Fair Park, Franklin, King, Mitchell, Rockefeller, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington, Watson, Wilson, Woodruff) Applications Received (10-1-04 5:00 p.m.) 69 ( .02%) Applications Approved 61 (88%) 6 Declined 55 Accepted Students report to \"Receiving School\" site on October 25, 2004. \"NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND\" 3 YEAR SUMMARY 2002-03 2003-04 Applications Mailed 3323 7619 Applications Received 202 128 (6%) (1.7%) Applications Approved 135 72 (67%) (56%) 2004-05 4364 69 (1.6%) 61 (88%) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: October 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: The renovation and media additions at Pulaski Heights Middle and Elementary Schools are complete except for a punch list (discrepancies) that has been developed by the architect. Shelving for the media center has been installed, and the books are in place. The classroom and cafeteria additions at Parkview have been completed and are being used by students and staff. The new field house is nearing completion and should soon be in operation, pending installation of the gas line to the facility. The renovation of Scott Field has begun. The renovation is a partnership between LRSD and UALR. When completed in March 2005, UALR will use the track as part of their athletic program. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer .:.n. Pl ::c C: ~ m ~ 1\"::c .., C: m~\n,c z is\n,c zm zu, mo .... C: ~ m Cl) CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I t:st. 1.\nompIet1on Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration HVAC $70,000 Oct-04 Brady ___ Addition/renovation - ~-- $973,6~ _ _Q_ct-04 1-C_e_n_tral _____ --~Renovation - Interior ~ $10,200,266 Aug-05 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area__ _ ~ $225,000 Dec-04 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade ____ $9,200 Oct-04 Dunbar _ R enovation/addition -___ ___ $6,149,023 Nov-04 Henderson MablevaleElem ~ Lockers- ---+--- $43,854 Dec-04 --Fire Alarm Upgrade -- - $12,000 Oct-04 Parkview - Addition _____ ~ $2,121 ,226- Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation -- - - $1 ,193,259- - Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS -- - Renovation -- ___ _._ $3,755,041 Oct-04 Scott Field --~Track Renovations -- --- $289,056 Dec-04 -W-a-ke- fi-1eld- Rebuild - - - -- - $5,300,000 Oct-04 Washington Western Hills ___F1_ re Alarm Upgrade __ _: :::: $11]oa -- Oct-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 I I t:st. 1.\nompIe1Ion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Fair Park Roof _____ $245,784 Jan-05 Gibbs --,._ddition -- _______________ $705,670 Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel __ $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell IRenovation ___ $2,212,493 Aug-05 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows ________ $215,000 Jun-05 Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I I 1:sc. 1..,ompIe11on Project Description Cost Date Chicot Electrical Upgrade ____________U_ n_kn_o_w_n_ ___U_ n_kn_o_w_n, !Electrical Upg~rad-e ---------+, -- Unknown Unknown Booker CI over da Ie Elem_e_n_ta_r~y ---.-A~.d...,d~i.t..i.o,_n_ __________- -,... __.$ .c.5_2_0__,,_7_5_0_ ___A _u,g._-_0-51 Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Forest Heights I Remodel $1,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation I $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 I Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Administration Administration -- !Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration A- n-nex - -~,-E-ne_r_gy_m_o_n-ito- r-in_g_s_y-ste_m_i_n-st_a_lla-t-io_n_--+_ ---~-----M~ay~ 02__, Alternative Learnin_g_c=-t-r_--=Ene_r=gy~m-o-n\"i\"t\"o- r-icn-~g-s~y-st,.e..-m\"\"'i-n\"s\"t'-a,l,l-a...t.,i,.o.._n_-+----$=-1,...5.,,.,.. 1.,..6,,...0.,-,-----cOCc\"\"~t:.o,,-.11 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett ----+-P--ar-ti~a~la_s_b_e-st_os~a~ba- t~e~m-e-nt------+----$23_7~,2- 3-7~----J-u-1--0-1-, Badgett !Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 I Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 Bale I Partial roof replacement $269,587 ' Dec-01 Bale HVAC I $664,587 Aug-01 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I 1Es t. Completion Facility Name Project Descriotion Cost Date Baseline ___ Renovation __ ___ $953,520 Aug-04 Booker Gym Roof ____ $48,525 Oct-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms___ ~ $25,000 ' -- Aug-04 Booker --Energy efficient lighting -- ~ - $170,295 ~ Apr-01 1-B-o_o_k-er______ --rnergy monitoring system installation ~ $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement -~~---- ~ - $10,900 ~ 1-B,--o_o_k-er ________ Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady Energy efficient lighting - ---~ - $8(),593 -- Sep-02 ,-~-~-ai - 1 ~~r---------+-~- ~~~\n0 ~i~i~~~i~\n~~stem installation ---,- $i~~:~~~ -- ~~ 1C-,-a-_rve_r_ _______P_ a_rking lot __-_ -_-- __ ~ $111 ,742 _ Au~ ,C_e_n_tr_al ________R_ efle_cting Pond __ ___ ____ $57,561 _ Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking ___ _ _ $174,000 Aug~ Central/Quig~ --S-tadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 _c- Aug-03 Central/Quigley AthleticFleid Improvement ___ ___ $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System ___ $14,500 Aug-03 Central ~ rchase land for school ______ Unknown Dec-02 Central --r--cR_o_of \u0026amp; exterior renovations 1 $2,000,000 I De~ ,_C_e_n_tr_al --------~C_e_ilin~g~a_n_d wall repair ______ $24,000 Oct:.Q.!_ Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug__:_Q_!_ Cen_t_ra_l _______ _,.F_ro_n_t _la_n_din~g_ti_le_r_e~pai_r _ -----------.-- $22,470 Aug-01 ,_C_h_ic_o_t _______ --+-D_r_a_in_a=g_e______ 1 $64,700___ Aug-04 Chicot ____ ----'--S_ound Attenuation I $43,134 Jul-04 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 ~ Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting ___ , $189,743 ___ Jul::Q_1_ Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition i $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd ~ nergy efficient lighting I $90,665 - Au9.::Ql Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace rooftop HVAC 1 $215,570 Aug~ Facilities Service Interior renovation I $84,672 ' Mar-01 Facility Services jFire alarm I $12,000 -- Aug-03 Fair Park IHVAC renovation/fire alarm I $315,956 Apr-02 f-F-_air_P_ark_____ _ !Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceiling~--- $59,310 , Aug-01 16 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music J. A. Fair room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 J. A. Fair Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras I $12,500 , Jun-01 J. A. Fair 'Athletic Field Improvement $38,0QQ I Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System I $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs I $391,871 Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC I $485,258 Nov-03 -- -- Forest Park Diagonal parking I $111 ,742 Aug-03 -- Forest Park Energy efficient lighting I $119,788 May-01 Fulbright - - -- E nergy efficient lighting I $134,463 ~ Fulbright -  Energy monitoring system installation _[_ $11,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units I $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright - Parking lot - $140,000 - Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs I $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin Renovation I $2,511,736 , Mar-03 Geyer Springs 1 Roof Repair --- I $161,752 Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation I $11 ,770 Jul-01 2 ~\n\u0026gt; :c -.::, C: ms\n:oz is\n:o zm zu, mo r- C: ~ m \"' rn \u0026gt; C: C :::\n0\n:o \"' ~  CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall ~ or renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 -- Hall Asbestos abatement I $168,222 Aug-01 Hall -- ~ rgy efficient lighting L $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 Hall - Infrastructure improvements T- $93,657 __ Aug-01 Hall - Intercom I -Fe-b-01 Hall - - --Security cameras I $10,600 Jun-01 Energy efficient lighting $193,679 --- Henderson I Jul-01 Roof replacement gym - _I_ $107,835  - Henderson May-01 Henderson -- -- ~ sbestos abatement Phase I $500,000~ Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 -- -1-- $250,000 Henderson -- Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement I $43,~ Oct-01 ---- Jefferson- - Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 _l:'arking lot -- ~ $269,588 - Laidlaw -- Jul-01 Energy monitoring system installation --ru-,150 -- Mabelvale Elem. Aug-01 Replace HVAC units -- - - $300,000 - Mabelvale Elem. I Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. -- Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 Energy efficient lighting - - - $106.~ - Mabelvale Elem. I Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers -- $134,793 - Aug-01 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851 ,621 Mar-04 Mann Partial Replacement __ $11 ,500,00-0 - Apr-04 Mann Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Dec-01 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement , used so far on the -- Oct-01 Mann Fencing I projects listed Sep-01 Mann --Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System I $14,750 Jul-03 McClell-an -- - - _ ~ urity cameras - I $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan 1 Energy efficient lighting $303.~ - May-01 -- McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,ooo I Aug-01 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 McClellan Classroom Addition I $2,155,622 Jul-04 McDermott 1 Fire Alarm Upgrade I $7,700 I Sep-04 McDermott 'Energy efficient lighting $79,411 I Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 I Aug-02 -Me-adowcliff 1Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 Aug-02 Meadowcliff - - IEngergy efficient lighting - $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan 1 Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 Metropolitan - Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installatio~ _ $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell -- Building Remediation - $165,000 Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 1 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 -Mitchell Asbestos abatement I $13,000 Jul-01 Oa-khu-rst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek --- Energy monitoring system installation I $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting I $81 ,828 Apr-01 -- Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 I Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 I Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition I $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek I Parking Improvements $142,541 Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Parkview HVAC controls - $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Sep-01 -- ~- - -Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 -- -N-ov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 ~ g-01 + Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 ___Au g-01 --- Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement ~ rgy monitoring system installat~ $5,290 --- Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm + - - $25,000 ~ g-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 -- Rightsell Energy efficient lighting - - - - $84,898 ~ -01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 ~ g-01 Parking addition ___ + Rockefeller $111 ,742 Aug-02 + - Romine Asbestos- a-batem-ent - $10,000 ~ pr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition - $3,534,675 Mar-03 -- Security{fransportation Bus cameras $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Sep-04 - Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest 'New roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest i Drainage / street widening --,----- $250,000 - ~ g-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 Dec-01 Tech Ctr / Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Technology U~grade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry 1 Energy efficient lighting I $73,850 Feb-01 Terry 1 Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry - Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield 1 Energy efficient lighting I $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield I Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 I Nov-02 Washington !Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson I Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 I Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson 1Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson I Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 I Aug-02 Western Hills IADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills 1Asbestos abatement I $191 ,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom I $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 - I Jul-01 Williams Renovation I $2,106,492  Mar-04 W-il-liams - Parking expansions I $183,717 Dec-03 Energy efficient lighting - -- $122,719 - -- Williams I Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion I $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 Aug-02 4 .:n.. Pl :c C: ~ m ~\n,,, :c -0 C: m~\noz ~\no zm zc,, mo ,.... C: ~ m u, !\"' \u0026gt; C: 0 :::\n0\no \"\no' m c3 =l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker .:n.. ~ ::,: C: \"0 C ~ m ~ l\"::i:: \"0 C: m!f\naz is\na zm zu, mo .... C: ill m U\u0026gt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARIZA SAS Date: October 28, 2004 To: Board of Directors From:@Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - October This is the sixtieth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - October 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year are: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org.\n,,, 23\ns ~~ -\u0026lt; ::z: \u0026lt;-0 :_i,:..O.. ..., en lm :,c~ ! (\") cz m en C) ~ l\"'::z: ~i :,c  is~ zm zmcon ,.... C: ~ emn DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: This month the following technology activities took place:  The district was recently notified that E-rate funding appeals were approved by the SLD for 2003-04 funding year. Total approved on appeal was $1.7 million. This is in addition to the already approved amount of $1 .3 million for media retrieval systems in 2003-2004.  Riverdeep math program is now available to Middle and High School students from home via the internet. This application can be accessed from the districts' web page under the \"Parent\" tab.  Technology training classes for teachers are being offered at the Technology Center and have been well attended. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services !Jl -n z \u0026gt;z (\") ! ~\n,,,::c \"DC: m~ ::Oz ~\no zm Z Ul mo ,- C: ~ m U) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: SECOND READING: POLICY JIH - STUDENT SEARCHES BACKGROUND: Attorney Chris Heller provided a report at the September board meeting regarding the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals on our student search procedures. At that time, the Board approved policy JIH on first reading. RATIONALE: The Board of Directors and the LRSD administration have an obligation to provide a safe and secure learning environment for our students. It is therefore necessary for our security staff to conduct constitutionally lawful searches when necessary and appropriate. Legal counsel has recommended implementing a Board policy that will provide for those searches to be conducted for administrative rather than for law enforcement purposes. FUNDING: No additional funding required. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the need for additional research by our attorneys, it is recommended that the Board table action on second reading of policy JIH, Student Searches at this time. After additional review, the policy will be returned for second reading approval and implementation. PREPARED BY: Sadie Mitchell Chris Heller ~ ?\" :r \"0 C: m~\noz lS\no zm zu, mo ,... C: ~ m \u0026lt;n .?.,' z z\u0026gt; n 5,: ~ ~ ?\"~ cer. o~ Zcr. ~er. 6~ z\n:c \u0026lt;n \u0026lt; c,,'.: er. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: JIH STUDENT SEARCHES It is the policy of the Little Rock School District Board of Education to conduct administrative searches of students for the purpose of detecting and deterring the presence of weapons and drugs in schools. In order for the District to implement an effective search policy in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, student searches will be conducted for administrative, rather than law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, to the extent this policy does not conflict with state or federal law, any contraband discovered during an administrative search of a student will subject that student to appropriate Little Rock School District administrative sanctions but will not be reported to law enforcement authorities. Any student found in possession of drugs or any contraband will be given an administrative sanction as outlined in the Little Rock Students Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.CA 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are considf.rJd intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly William7oirector of Human Resources .., z  nz ! Personnel Changes Page2 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees NONE New Certified Employees Baker, Deborah Reading Rec. 9-13-04 1-07 STEPHENS TCH925 Balmaz, Bettye Elem II 9-9-04 5-20 BOOKER TCH925 Binyon, Jonathan English 8-11-04 1-03 PARKVIEW TCH925 Brown, Carleton English 8-11-04 4-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Durham, Karen Special Ed 8-11-04 2-10 PHMS SPE925 England, Patricia English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Forehand, Shirley Math 8-11-04 1-09 MABELVALE MID TCH925 Fuss, Amy American History 8-11-04 1-01 FOREST HGTS. TCH925 Gardenhire, Carroll Special Ed. 8-11-04 4-05 ALT LRNG CNTR SPE925 Green, Sarah English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Horne, Wanda Special Ed. 8-11-04 1-04 HENDERSON SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 37318.00 annual 31681.43 prorated 57276.00 annual 51309.75 prorated 31195.00 34575.00 40785.00 30040.00 38127.00 30040.00 38041 .00 30040.00 32350.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 October 28, 2004 NAME Ledoux, Kim Miller, Kasey Myton, Debra Pritz, Colleen Rizzardi, Marcia Roberts, Melanie Shue, Mary Trammell, Brett Walker, Sharon Warren, Alyson Whaley, Andress POSITION SCHOOL Math JA FAIR Math MANN Counselor PARKVIEW Pre-Algebra PHMS English PARKVIEW English FOREST HGTS. English FOREST HGTS. Spanish CENTRAL Math ALT LRNG CNTR Business Ed PARKVIEW English HALL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 8-11-04 4-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-16-04 4-11 CNL10 8-11-04 2-17 TCH925 8-11 -04 4-08 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-18-04 4-18 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 9-13-04 4-05 TCH925 8-20-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 4-07 TCH925 Certified Promotion ANNUAL SALARY 34575.00 30040.00 50560.00 annual 49277.25 prorated 49217.00 41507.00 30040.00 53061 .00 annual 51679.20 prorated 30040.00 38041 .00 annual 33682.01 prorated 30040.00 annual 29101 .25 40351.00 Sebourn, Karen Promoted from 9.25 mo. teacher to 9.25 mo. librarian position split between Carver and Washington ?\u0026lt; 0 ~ 0 en z C'l\na m ~\no: en 2:5 ~ ?\u0026lt; 0 :c ls~ C\na ~z 31:C'l men .z. . ~ \u0026gt; ~u. o- 0~ z u. ~: 0 IT Z\n,t en\u0026lt; c': IT u. Personnel Changes Page4 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Certified Transfer NONE Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Bealer, Henry Driver Asst. 1-27-98 42-09 Reason: None Given PROCUREMENT 10-28-04 AN12 Bluford, Jacqueline Trainee 9-14-03 2-02 Reason: Terminated CHILD NUTR 9-21-04 FSMEAL Brown, Ann Deseg Monitor 7-26-88 1-01 Reason: Retired DESEGRATION 10-28-04 DESMON Campbell, Paul Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: None Given DODD 9-21-04 INA925 Clark, Tenisha Instr. Aide 4-17-97 33-16 Reason: None Given CLOVERDALE 8-10-04 INA925 Dokes, Joann Child Nutrition 3-10-04 3-01 Reason: None Given MCDERMOTT 8-16-04 FSH550 Foster, Napoleon Bus Driver 8-14-98 3-11 Reason: Health TRANSPORT 9-10-04 BUSDRV Johnson, Lott Security Officer 4-12-04 36-10 Reason: None Given JA FAIR 9-16-04 SOFR9 Jones, Taneadra Care 8-30-04 2-02 Reason: None Given CARE 10-28-04 CARE Mitchell, Tolice Care 8-30-04 1-03 Reason: None Given CARE 10-11-04 CARE Crosby, Darlene Instr. Aide 1-31-91 33-17 Reason: Personal WAKEFIELD 10-01-04 INA925 Payne, Celeste Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: Personal FOREST PARK 9-15-04 INA925 Pitts, Joe Custodian 8-28-01 31-05 Reason: None Given DUNBAR 5-28-04 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 13472.00 119022.00 14735.00 16109.00 9350.00 16390.00 15463.00 7.70 per hour 7.28 per hour 16595.00 14735.00 12821.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 October 28, 2004 NAME Reeves, Sharon Reason: Retired Simpson, Sylvia Reason: None Given Smith, Jimmy Reason: None Given Tidwell, Paula Reason: Personal Ye, Weiwen Reason: Personal Alexander, Betty Anderson, Carroll Baker, Paul Boyd, April Brown, Darrell POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Secretary 4-1-82 51-20 MAINTENANCE 9-13-04 MAINT Custodian 1-26-04 31-03 MABELVALE JR 5-28-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 4-7-03 33-17 ALE 8-10-04 INA925 Custodian 8-18-00 31-07 ROMINE 9-27-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 10-21-98 33-20 GIBBS 11-8-04 INA925 New Non-Certified Em~lo~ees Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 PHMS FSH550 Custodian 9-7-04 31-01 MITCHELL CUS12 Custodian 9-20-04 31-01 MANN CUS925 Nurse 9-13-04 52-08 WOODRUFF NURSES FOREST PARK PUL. HGTS. ELEM. Custodian 10-04-04 31-01 FRANKLIN CUS928 ANNUAL SALARY 46572.00 12085.00 16595.00 13616.00 18149.00 9350.00 annual 8394.89 prorated 14532.00 annual 11749.00 prorated 11379.00 annual 9832.94 prorated 33528.00 annual 28463.87 prorated 11379.00 annual 9338.20 prorated ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 (I) z Cl\n,:, m ~\n:,\u0026lt;\n(I) ~ :,.. ?\u0026lt; C::c ls~ C:::::,:, ~z I: Cl me,, :!:j ~ .\u0026gt; a: ~ c- 0~ z er. ~: o rr Z\n:t Cl\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ?\nrr er. Personnel Changes Page 6 October 28, 2004 NAME Bryant, Caroline Burnett, Tarneisha Cartznes, Jerome Clayton, Bobby Cross, Dunte Curry, Tangela Davis, Arrysen Dorsey, Betty Doss, Jimmy Draper, James Evans, Felicia POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Care 10-18-04 3-17 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-03 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-02 CARE CARE Custodian 9-07-04 31-01 PHMS CUS12 Custodian 8-23-04 31-01 MEADOWCLIFF CUS925 Care 9-17-04 3-08 CARE CARE Care 10-11-04 2-01 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-12-04 33-19 MABELVALE MIDDLE INA925 Maintenance 9-8-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-05 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10.36 per hour 7.38 per hour 7.70 per hour 14532.00 annual 11749.28 prorated 5689.50 annual 5503.97 prorated 8.85 per hour 7.55 per hour 9350.00 annual 8394.00 prorated 17621 .00 annual 17525.75 prorated 19020.00 annual 15216.00 prorated 11600.00 annual 10972.97 prorated Personnel Changes Page7 October 28, 2004 NAME Ewing, Pavia Fields, Samia Foreman, Lakeisha Geeter, Lula Gregory, Regena Hamilton, Ronita Harvell, Lola Hendrix, Christal Higgins, Greogory POSITION SCHOOL Clerical BRADY Instr. Aide CHICOT Child Nutrition HALL Care CARE Nurse STEPHENS Care CARE Child Nutrition PARKVIEW Clerical STEPHENS Maintenance ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-13-04 39-08 CLK10 10-06-04 33-04 INA925 9-01-04 3-01 FSH550 10-11-04 4-01 CARE 9-20-04 38-03 NURSES 9-13-04 1-08 CARE 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 9-13-04 39-04 CLK10 10-04-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 annual 22096.55 prorated 11253.00 annual 9002.40 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 6.25 per hour 19020.00 annual 15651.87 prorated 8.05 per hour 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 20184.00 annual 16306.29 prorated 29760.00 annual 21781.79 prorated :-\u0026lt; n,... 0 U\u0026gt; z Q\n,:, m I ~ U\u0026gt; :!S :,.. ?\u0026lt; O::r:: 5~ C:\n,:, ~z :1:0 mu, .z.. . ~\n,,,,~ V. 8~ z V. ~::: Oz\n:rcr U\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 1\" rr V. Personnel Changes Page 8 October 28, 2004 NAME Holliman, Darren Jackson, Debbie Jackson, Gwendolyn Jackson, Laura Johnson, Mildred Jones, Valerie Madden, Andrea Marsh, Janice Mathis, Taurus POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Maintenance 9-13-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-15-04 33-16 CLOVERDALE ELEM. INA925 Custodian 8-16-04 1-01 J. A. FAIR CUS925 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Care 9-13-04 1-06 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-27-04 7-01 WILLIAMS FSH650 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 WILLIAMS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-21-04 33-16 HENDERSON INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 29760.00 annual 23554.72 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 14019.18 prorated 5689.50 annual 5658.58 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 7.74 per hour 11050.00 annual 9327.15 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 13670.88 prorated Personnel Changes Page9 October 28, 2004 NAME McCoy, Betty McKenzie, Sherman Mitchell, Cecelia Muhammad, Kaye Nash, Niketa Nolly, Carolyn Nounanno, Christain Ollison, Yolanda Peterson, Montez Pondexter, Brack POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 10-05-04 3-01 GEYER SPRINGS FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-16-04 33-16 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Child Nutrition 8-24-04 3-01 J.A. FAIR FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-28-04 33-09 WAKEFIELD INA925 Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-06 ALC INA925 Instr. Aide 8-23-04 33-03 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-01 J. A. FAIR INA925 Care 9-13-04 1-04 CARE INA925 Security Officer 8-16-04 36-16 CENTRAL SOFR9 Instr. Aide 8-17-04 33-9 ALC INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 7691 .13 prorated 16109.00 annual 5847.77 prorated 9350.00 annual 9098.66 prorated 5228.00 annual 4295.44 prorated 11946.00 10934.00 annual 10461 .00 prorated 10295.00 annual 9738.51 prorated 7.41 per hour 18491 .00 13070.00 annual 12787.41 prorated ?\u0026lt; C'\u0026gt; r- 0 (/) z C)\nIll m !\n,,: (/) ?S ~ ?\u0026lt; 0::,: 5!\n! \u0026lt;=\n,o ~z :I: C) mu, .z.. . ~ ,,.a: . C c,, g~ Zc,, ~~ 0 IT z\n,c U\u0026gt;\u0026lt; c': IT c,, Personnel Changes Page 10 October 28, 2004 NAME Reams, Bernard Simpson, Nena Spaight, Linda Stricklen, Lisa Taylor, Lee Thompson, Dian Vanderpool, Milagros William, Adam Williams, Mary Wilson Murray, Judy POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide BASELINE Child Nutrition MCCLELLAN Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Child Nutrition HENDERSON Security Officer MCCLELLAN Custodian CARVER Care CARE Maintenance START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-20-04 33-13 INA925 8-27-04 3-01 FSH550 9-20-04 33-09 INA12 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 8-16-04 36-11 SOFR9 9-27-04 31-01 CUS925 9-20-04 1-06 CARE 9-9-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Care 10-4-04 1-05 CARE CARE Clerical 9-22-04 39-12 BOOKER CLK10 ANNUAL SALARY 14735.00 annual 12584.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8947.85 prorated 16603.00 annual 12858.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 15929.00 5689.50 annual 4761.86 prorated 8.33 per hour 19020.00 annual 15135.06 prorated 7.56 per hour 25632.00 annual 21212.69 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 October 28, 2004 NAME Wilson, Tina Woodley, Stephanie Cooper, Floyd Davis, Johnnie Williams, Ed POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 8-30-04 3-01 WESTERN HILLS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-10-04 33-04 WASHINGTON INA925 Reclassification Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Research Spec. 7 -1-04 64-20 PRE ADC12 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 5964.09 annual 5287.09 prorated 60924.00 60924.00 64668.00 ?\u0026lt; ,(.\"..). 0 (/) z Cl :,0 m I (/) ?S :,.. ?\u0026lt; 0::,:: 5~ C: :,0 ~z :I: Cl mU\u0026gt; z --t DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and aproval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager ?\u0026lt; n g z C) I DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School Desk, chair, HP Tonja, Michael and Pavilion 17\" monitor Chris Hettinger and HP Desktop scanner. Total value of all donated items is $200.00. Central High School $500.00 cash to the Jeanie Brown Swim Team Central High School $80.00 cash toward Bob and Wanda the \"Spirit Banner\" Wimberley Central High School $245.00 cash toward Sol Alman Company the \"Spirit Banner\" Central High School $300.00 cash to the Randal and Jan Hundley Troubadours Club Central High School $250.00 cash toward Rosie Dunham, the completion of the Class of 1943-44 reflecting pool and $250.00 cash to be used as needed Cloverdale Magnet Large sandwich food Burger King/Allied Food Middle School coupons valued at Industries, Inc. approximately $50.00 Cloverdale Magnet Employee of the Ryan's Grill, Buffet and Middle School month food coupons Bakery valued at approximately $50.00 Gibbs Magnet Six (6) computer Nuvell Financial Services Elementary School monitors, valued at $600.00, to be used for student advancement Hall High School Weight and training Mr. Fred Barofsky and equipment, valued at friends in memory of approximately Donnie Dietz, a 1962 $20,000.00, for new graduate from Hall gym and Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to be presented to a Hall student each year .!J.,I z  School/Department Item Donor z (') \u0026gt;,... (/) Martin L. King, Jr. $100.00 cash for Reza Hakkak, parent lnterdistrict Magnet use by counselors Elementary School in purchasing uniforms and school supplies McClellan Magnet $1,000.00 cash to be Mr. Jerome Tidemore, High School distributed equally to Algebra I teacher ~ (') students who scored ,... 0 (/) proficient and advanced z C\u0026gt; on the End of Course\n,:, m Exam ~ :,\n: (/) Pulaski Heights Sound system, valued Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School at $2,765.00, for the and Middle School PT A auditorium Pulaski Heights Services of a full-time Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School art teacher, valued at PTA $21,640.50, for the i!S ~ ?\u0026lt; 2004-05 school year O:z: 5~ C:\n,:, Rightsell Academy $300.00 cash to be J. R. and Mary Sue 2lz ~C\u0026gt; m\u0026lt;n applied toward the Gusewelle ~ school uniform drive Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street DATE: Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/2/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT ~ FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL --(V:, ci-LL(tu. \\__, SUBJECT: DONATION Tonja, Michael \u0026amp; Chris Hettinger of 4 Butterfly Cove, Little Rock, AR 72210, donated the following items, valued at $200.00, to Central High School: 1. Desk 2. Chair 3. HP Pavilion 17\" Monitor 4. HP Desktop Scanner It is my recommendation that these items be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .:  ~ f\":'. t, ....... . l,.-\nDATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/10/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ DO ATION Jeanie Brown of 60 Longlea Court, Little Rock, AR 72212, very generously donated $500.00 to the Little Rock Central High School Swim Team. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. r. :.~ :- r~ 1 ... }~: :,-:. j j f!  I\n1 ~  - .... DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATION Bob \u0026amp; Wanda Wimberley of 6502 Pleasant Place, Little Rock, AR 72205, very graciously donated $80.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIP SUBJECT: DO ATION Sol Alman Company of 1300 East 9th Street, Little Rock, AR 72203, very graciously donated $245.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ n 5 u, z C) :,::, I u, DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/24/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF !)}OCURE~ENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ ~ DO ATIO Randal \u0026amp; Jan Hundley of 5515 Country Club Blvd., Little Rock, AR 72207, graciously contributed $300.00 to the Troubadours Club. It is my recommendation that this contribution be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District.   ~  ~ r -  t-' \\ - - - : - ~ ,.~ f: :t~ t: DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/21/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Rosie Dunham, in behalf of Little Rock High School's class of 1943-1944, graciously contributed $250.00 toward the completion of the reflecting pool and $250.00 to be spent as we desire. Ms. Dunham's address is 3017 N. Grant, Little Rock, AR 72207. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Angela '2tt},,,ncipal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. Jeffery Williams, District Manager Burger King Large Sandwich Allied Food Industries, Inc. Food Coupons 3300 S. University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72204 Approximate Value $50.00 n\n'-:- i~ ?r~ 1~ ~ t . ~ \\,.:- - -  6300 Hinkson Road  Phone /501) 447-2500  Fax /501) 447 -2501  Little Rock. Arkansas CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement a /vl1 From: Angela Munns, Principal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. RYA 'S Grill, Buffet \u0026amp; Bakery 8815 Baseline Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 Employee of the Month Food Coupons Approximate Value $50.00 6300 Hinkson Road  Phone (501) 447-2500  Fax 1501) 447-2501  Little Rock. Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 en z Cl\na I rn GIBBS MAGNET Memo To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement J / From: Felicia Hobbs, Principakft\\ I CC: Dr. Sadie Mitchell Oats 9/28/2004 Ra: Donations Nuvell Financial Services, a loan servicing company in Little Rock, wishes to donate six (6) computer monitors to be used for student advancement in education. The monitors are valued at $100.00 each in which there is a total of $600.00 It is recommended this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. In advance, thank you for your consideration. FH:kt # hall high school 6700 \"H\" Street  (501 } 447-1900  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 To: From: Darral Paradis, Director of Prqcurement Vernon Smith, Jr., Principal V~C[f'RE: Donated Equipment Date: October 5, 2004 Mr. Fred Barofsky and friends are donating equipment for the weight and training room for our new gym in the name of Donnie Dietz who graduated from Hall High School in 1962. Mr. Barofsky and friends attended West Point Military Academy and were football teammates of Mr. Dietz. Mr. Dietz died in Vietnam. Mr. Dietz teammates would like to present the Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to a Hall High School student each year. The following equipment should arrive in the next four to six weeks: The donation will total approximately $20,000.00 dollars. A list of donated equipment is as follows:  Stationary Bike (2)  Bicep Curl  Lat Pull Down (2)  Seated Row Press  Abdominal Press  Leg Press  Seated Leg Curl  Leg Extension  Shoulder Press (2)  Chest Press  Standing Calf Machine  Dual Adjustable Pulley (2)  Ice Machine  Training Table  Training Supplies !.J.,I z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt; ~ MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradise, Director of Procurement J.H, From: Tyrone Harris, Principal Date: September 1, 2004 Re: Donation A parent of Martin Luther King Elementary Magnet School has generously donated $100.00 to our counselors. The money will serve the purpose of assisting in purchasing uniforms and school supplies for our students. The parent is Reza Hakkak of 12680 Rivercrest Dr., Little Rock, AR 72212. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. t{ 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 ' McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA To: Darral Paradis, Director - Procurement and Materials Management From: Larry Buck, Principal ~ McClellan Magnet~ Re: Donation Date: September 7, 2004 Mr. Jerome Tidemore, an Algebra I teacher on staff at McClellan Magnet High School, has generously donated to the students of McClellan $1 ,000.00. This donation will be equally divided between these students who scored proficient and advanced on the End of Course Exam during the Spring 2004 Assessment. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. r~~ ~-: ~ ~= r : r r.~ ~ L ..i :-, '\":\n\n.J : ~. i. l- ~ 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; n 5 u, z C) ::,:, I u, PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Carter, Principal/,~ DATE: September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. and the Pulaski Heights Middle School P.T.A. has generously donated a sound system for the auditorium valued at $2,765.00. Equipment donated is as follows:  Mackie DFX Mixer $380.00  Crown PCC 160 Microphones(3) 900.00  Gemini CDJ -10 CD player 225.00  Crown XL5202 Amplifier 410.00  Yamaha MSP3 Power Monitor 150.00  Miscellaneous wire connections 500.00  Power Master Switch 200.00 It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: Frances Jones Assistant Superintendent 3' 9 North Pine src-f-'  F\"\"'11C 4.i!.--5900  Fax 447-5901  Little Rock. Arkansas 72205 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Lillie Carter, Principal J 4, September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. wishes to donate the service of a full-time art teacher for the 2004-2005 school year. The P.T.A. will pay the art teacher $21,640.50. This includes supplies and materials. It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: f ranees Jones Assistant Superintendent 319 North Pine Su,::co  r  = .1.17-5900  Fa, .1.1--sao  Little Rock Arkansas 72205 RIGHTSELL A CADEMY \"Great Expectations: Believe! Achieve! Succeed!\" TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement r/ Eunice M. Thrasher, Principani \\ Rightsell Academy I\" September 22, 2004 Donation The donor listed below has generously donated $300.00 towards the school uniform drive: J.R. and Mary Sue Gusewelle 13824 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you. /lh 'I 911 W,s! 1 9 Stree:  Phone (501 .:.:--61QO  Fa,: 150 ~.:---::::-  Little Roe\u0026lt; A,rk2'7sas 72205- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: September 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the September 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 09/30/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 09/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 11 ,111,439 19.31% 61,436,691 12,467,263 20.29% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 807,595 8.00% 12,135,000 986,045 8.13% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 198,137 52.14% 485,000 13,590 2.80% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 43,822 21 .91% 245,000 82,243 33.57% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 42,599 17.75% 215,000 48,071 22.36% TOTAL 98,607,800 12,203,593 12.38% 106,311,691 13,597,212 12.79% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% REVENUE  STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 9,677,479 18.18% 65,082,694 11 ,852,204 18.21% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,181,498 18.18% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141 ,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 8,275,000 1,387,526 16.77% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 266,989 19.07% 1,350,000 195,052 14.45% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 2,100,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 68,340 25.00% 5,542,510 1,430,540 25.81% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS  M TO M 3,900,000 368,422 9.45% 4,575,000 414,913 9.07% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 8,417 0.91% 934,380 109,000 11.67% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 12,043,596 16.11% 102,522,882 19,535,799 19.06% REVENUE OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,416 0.65% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,416 0.22% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 24,271,129 13.70% 212,770,581 33,147,071 15.58% REVENUE  OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 2,160,329 8.97% 21 ,531,929 1,972,536 9.16% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 21 ,884 0.55% 4,500,000 57,924 1.29% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,282,885 27,964,934 2,191,329 7.84% TOTAL 52,765,141 4,465,099 8.46% 53,996,863 4,221,789 7.82% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 28,736,225 12.50% 266,767,444 37,368,861 14.01% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 200~ 04 09/30/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 09/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 12,825,743 12.74% 117,324,912 14,828,817 12.64% BENEFITS 26,483,772 3,473,524 13.12% 36,185,811 4,383,568 12.11% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 2,914,009 14.78% 20,959,918 2,682,273 12.80% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 2,284,946 27.91% 8,725,914 1,850,893 21 .21% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 91 ,687 5.82% 2,760,600 283,330 10.26% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 69,173 0.83% 10,770,418 73,741 0.68% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,705,779 38.90% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 26,364,861 14.88% 209,202,382 28,693,456 13.72% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 2,515,820 9.66% 23,853,134 2,332,732 9.78% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 1,235,893 30.90% 5,007,809 1,061 ,880 21 .20% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,491,447 10.09% 27,964,934 2,989,585 10.69% TOTAL 54,745,544 6,243,159 11.40% 56,825,877 6,384,197 11 .23% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 32,608,020 14.06% 266,028,259 35,077,653 13.19% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1 ,954,984) (3 ,871 ,796) 739,184 2,291 ,207 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 1,780,520 1,176,943 1,843,550 OPERATING 9,052,274 6,933,120 10,099,905 10,985,321 TOTAL 10,630,451 8,713,640 11,276,848 12,828,871 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01 -04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 09-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 21 ,393.23 63,512.98 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 1,939,015.99 955,096.57 3,194,407.93 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541 .25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591 .92 401 ,306.82 251 ,312.38 6,914,972.72 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 3,444,763.38 2,449,707.91 7,472,243.75 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 175,433.96 265,415.90 2,271,951 .60 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 80,000.00 5,981 ,913.38 3,921 ,532.76 19,952,487.03 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (80,000.00) 14,063,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 359,962.12 5,397,400.07 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 359,962.12 (80,000.00) 0.00 0.00 21,205,250.81 GRAND TOTAL ~l! ~~ ~Hi Zl l ~!l~ ~\nHI ~l l2.J2l2 li !Ill~ Ill~ ~II ~ l!~l ~~~ Zli ~l ~~!l !l!ll! Ill! PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 I r I PROJECT I ALLOCATIONS THRU 09-30-04 EXPENSE 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 EXPENSE 2003-04 '1 EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ' THRU 09-30-04 1 THRU 09-30-04 1 SUBTOTAL 753,846.55 38,786,097.95 265,814.17 4,883,405.13 18,920,386.34 51,641,607.54 12,878,988.97 15,356,965.72 889,772.32 443,467.00 113,930.47 2,641,482.13 791,385.63 397,615.34 575,016.53 (485,325.77)1 149,597.63 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 109,609.73 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 . 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 j 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 I I . 143,487, 112.37 1 5,852,669.42 ! 18,708,823.32 I 35,822,666.30 I I I I I 114,896.16 15,993,062.06 27,732.73 9,012.76 2,887,763.72 18,091,992.05 765,594.97 I 37,890,054.45 21,393.23 1,939,015.99 0.00 0.00 401,306.82 1 3,444,763.38 175,433.96 I 5,981,913.38 I I I 0.00 690,333.57 955,096.57 35,591,690.02 0.00 I 251,272.93 I 0.00 4,862,548.33 251,312.38 12,005,413.62 2,449,707.91 I 44,169,363.79 I 265,415.90 I 10,607,037.37 I 3,921,532.76 108,177,659.63 I ENDING ALLOCATION 09-30-04 63,512.98 3,194,407.93 14,541.25 20,856.80 6,914,972.72 7,472,243.75 2,271,951 .60 15,356,965.72 35,309,452.75 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.710% Repo 11 ,220,000.00 Operating 09-01-01 10-11-04 Twin City Bank 2.110% CD 4,640,334.89 Total 15,860,334.89 Activity Fund 09-16-04 TFN Bank of America 1.280% Repo 760,000.00 Total 760,000.00 Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11 ,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.540% Repo 2,140,000.00 Total 44,469,086.09 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_974","title":"Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-09-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/974"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["98 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1062","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Curricula","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1062"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["56 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nRJ~9~VED SEP 2 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION f,iONITORlNG Agenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting WATCH FOR CHILDREN September 2004 o-,:, \u0026gt; ::mO ~c: .... 3: Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m.., ::0 C: -z\n:o:,O o-\u0026lt; F\nOCI\u0026gt; \u0026gt; r-r-\ng ~ =Em mO r- C: 0~ 0,- iliJ ~ ::0 Cl) ?= \u0026gt;~ i,,~ C.,,: :..:.0. ~ lG ,=.l .mo :::!8 Oz z =l Cl) \u0026lt;5 z Cl) !D ~ ::0 ' im! ~ ::c '6  Cl) I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERSHIPS C. CITIZENS REMARKS 0. I RCTA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 September 23, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education ~ Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of Schools Partners in Education Program: New partnerships The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnerships: Otter Creek Elementary School and Cingular Wireless Otter Creek Elementary School and Metropolitan National Bank McClellan High School and Metropolitan National Bank Partnership Proposal Cingular Wireless and Otter Creek Elementary Cingular Wireless commits to the following partnership activities:  Send readers on ViPS Reading Day  Collect school supplies for students in need  Provide premiums to be used for student incentives  Participate in the 5th grade job shadowing on Ground Hog Day  Help families in need at Christmas and upon request by counselor/principal  Invite employees to volunteer to mentor students Otter Creek Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for display in lobby  Provide choir to perform at special occasions  Acknowledge Cingular as a Partner in Education  Invite Cingular employees to school events and volunteer recognition events Partnership Proposal Metropolitan National Bank and Otter Creek Elementary Metropolitan National Bank commits to the following partnership activities:  Send readers on ViPS Reading Day  Invite classes to take field trips to the branch to look at operations  Provide premiums to be used for student incentives  Participate in the 5th grade job shadowing on Ground Hog Day  Sponsor events such as Morning Muffins  Invite employees to volunteer to mentor students Otter Creek Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for display in bank lobby  Provide choir to perform on holidays and/or special occasions  Acknowledge Metropolitan National Bank as a Partner in Education  Invite the bank to school events and volunteer recognition events !=' CD C 8 !:!l C \"ti ~ m r\u0026gt; n =l !='mN r-z\no en ,~,.R~l ~ en Partnership Outline McClellan High School and Metropolitan National Bank Metropolitan National Bank's responsibilities: 1. Support Money Smarts Curriculum - This has already been implemented and the bank provided the in-service and the materials to teach this curriculum. 2. Serve on Business Finance Advisory Board 3. Provide guest Speakers 4. Establish/ provide consultation for the operations of mock bank on campus 5. Provide equipment for mock bank 6. In-service teachers concerning operations of mock bank 7. Participate in internship program (Tobe determined) McClellan's responsibilities: 1. Recognize Metropolitan National Bank as a Partner in Education 2. Provide instructor for Money Smarts 3. Conduct advisory board meeting 4. Schedule guest speakers on pertinent finance/banking topics 5. Lead teacher of BFA will coordinate the operations of mock bank 6. Provide facility for mock bank 7. Provide meeting place and teachers for in-service 8. Provide interns (To be determined) I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING September 23, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Administration of the Oath of Office B. Call to Order C. Roll Call 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. President's Welcome to Guests Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners In Education - New Partnerships Otter Creek Elementary School - Janis Tucker Cingular Wireless - Carola Clayton and Metropolitan National Bank - Virgil Miller \u0026amp; Debbie Knight McClellan High School - Steve Geurin \u0026amp; Nancy Leslie Metropolitan National Bank - Virgil Miller \u0026amp; Debbie Knight C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report - Committee Presentation: Jodie Carreiro C. Organizational Audit Leadership Team Presentation: Bob Klempen and Dennis Smith D. Budget Update E. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects F. Internal Auditors Report G. Technology Update ,f\u0026gt;.. C: 0 =I ~ ~ \"Cl ~ m E 6 % !=' ID C: 8 !!l C: ~ m Regular Board Meeting September 23, 2004 Page2 V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Election of Officers B. Minutes: Regular Board Meeting - 08-26-04 VI. CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION A. LRSD - LRCTA Partnership Agreement: National Board Certification Program B. Distance Learning Equipment Grant VII. SCHOOL SERVICES A. Report: Performance Evaluation for School Administrators B. First Reading: Policy JIH - Student Searches* VIII. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes IX. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION: A. Approval of Student Assignment Committee Recommendations X. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Board Disbursing Officers B. Authorization: Contract for Professional Services C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report XI. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions XII. EMPLOYEE HEARING XIII. ADJOURNMENT * For consideration of a suspension of the rules. !=' ID C 8 !!l C ~ m ~n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: September 23, 2004 Board of Directors 1 ~ Mark D. Milhollen, Manager \\~ Financial Services Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Bill Goodman, District Engineer~ September 2004 Construction Report-Bond Projects The new media center serving both Pulaski Heights Middle and Elementary Schools and the new media center at Dunbar Magnet Middle have been completed and are being used by the staff and students even though the shelving for the books has not been installed. I think you will agree with me that the exterior appearance at both locations is much better as well. I have had several patrons call me to tell me this. The latter phases of renovation of Central High are well under way. The project will be completed the summer of 2005. The project has gone very smoothly due to the good working relationship between the school staff, LRSD Facility Services personnel and the contractor. The reflecting pond at Central High School will be completed this month. The National Park Service will hold a dedication ceremony in the near future. Please call me at 447-1146 if you have any questions. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 ' p 1ii :z:c 0  -\u0026lt; C: \"D ~ m fl! !I: z m~ en s -  o r- C: ill~ !20 oc: \u0026gt;~ ~~\noz -\u0026lt; en mz-\n\u0026lt;o\no C: enO -::co::! ~ Facility Name Administration Booker Brady Central Central Central Dodd Dunbar Henderson Mablevale Elem Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem Pulaski Hgts. MS Wakefield Washington Western Hills CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Project Description Cost HVAC $70,000 Gym Roof $48,525 Addition/renovation $973,621 Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Reflecting Pond $57,561 Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Lockers $80,876 Fire Alarm Upgrade $12,000 Addition $2,121,226 Renovation $1 ,193,259 Renovation $3,755,041 Rebuild $5,300,000 Fire Alarm Upgrade $11,600 Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 t:st. compIetIon Date Oct-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Aug-05 Dec-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Nov-04 Dec-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Gibbs Addition $705,670 Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Aug-05 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Jun-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED t::st. (.\nOmpIeuon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition $520,750 Aug-05 Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Forest Heights Remodel $1 ,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Facility Name Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Carver Carver Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quiqlev Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Chicot Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Fulbright Franklin Geyer Springs Gibbs Gibbs CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description Cost Renovation $953,520 ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Asbestos abatement $10,900 Fire alarm $34,501 Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Asbestos abatement $345,072 Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 Parking lot $111 ,742 Student parking $174,000 Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Irrigation System $14,500 Purchase land for school Unknown Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Front landing tile repair $22,470 Drainage $64,700 Sound Attenuation $43,134 Energy efficient lighting $132,678 Energy efficient lighting $189,743 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Replace roof top HVAC $215,570 Interior renovation $84,672 Fire alarm $12,000 HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Asbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Press box $10,784 Security cameras $12,500 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Irrigation System $14,000 Roof repairs $391,871 Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Diagonal parking $111,742 Energy efficient lighting $119,788 Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Energy monitoring system installation $11,950 Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Parking lot $140,000 Roof repairs $200,000 Renovation $2,511,736 Roof Repair $161,752 Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Enerov monitorina svstem installation $11 ,770 Est. Completion Date Aug-04 Aug-04 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Sep-02 Auq-02 May-01 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Dec-02 Dec-02 Oct-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Jul-04 Jul-01 Jul-01 Nov-02 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Mar-01 Aug-03 Apr-02 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-04 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-03 May-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Jun-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 2 !JI !I: z m~ (J) s . -(\") r- C:\n:o\n:o u,\n:o !20 (\") C: ~ ~~\n:oz _. (J) z _. m\n:o\n:o C: (J) (\") :-r::o::! ti. Facility Name Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Hall Henderson Henderson Henderson Henderson IRC Jefferson Jefferson Laidlaw Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale MS Mabelvale MS Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann Mann McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McClellan McDermott McDermott McDermott Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Project Description Cost Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Asbestos abatement $168,222 Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Intercom Security cameras $10,600 Energy efficient lighting $193,679 Roof replacement gym $107,835 Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Asbestos abatement $43,639 Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1,630,000 Parking lot $269,588 Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Replace HVAC units $300,000 Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Energy efficient lighting $106,598 Renovate bleachers $134,793 Renovation $6,851,621 Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Walkway canopies is what has been Boiler replacement used so far on the Fencing projects listed Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Irrigation System $14,750 Security cameras $36,300 Energy efficient lighting $303,614 Stadium stands repair $235,000 Intercom $46,000 Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 Energy efficient lighting $79,411 Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 Fire alarm $16,175 Asbestos abatement $253,412 Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Replace cooling tower $37,203 Replace shop vent system $20,000 Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Building Remediation $165,000 Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Asbestos abatement $13,000 HVAC renovation $237,237 Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 Energy efficient lighting $81,828 Asbestos abatement $10,000 Parking lot $138,029 6 classroom addition $888,778 Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Est. Completion Date Sep-03 Aug-01 Jul-01 Apr-01 Aug-01 Feb-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 May-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Jul-02 Oct-01 Nov-02 Jul-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Dec-02 Aug-01 Mar-04 Apr-04 Dec-01 Dec-01 Oct-01 Sep-01 Aug-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Jun-01 May-01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Jul-04 Sep-04 Feb-01 Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Dec-00 May-01 Aug-01 Jul-04 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost Parkview HV AC controls $210,000 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Rockefeller Parking addition $111,742 Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Securityrrransportation Bus cameras $22,500 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Southwest New roof $690,000 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Southwest Drainage / street widening $250,000 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Est. Completion Date Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 Jun-02 Aug-03 Dec-02 Apr-01 Mar-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Apr-02 Mar-03 Jun-01 Sep-04 Aug-00 Oct-03 Jan-02 Aug-03 Aug-02 Aug-03 Dec-01 Jun-04 Nov-02 Feb-01 Aug-02 Sep-02 Jun-01 Feb-01 Nov-02 Jun-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Auo-04 Aug-02 Dec-01 Jul-01 Mar-04 Dec-03 Jun-01 Feb-04 Aug-03 Auq-02 4 \u0026gt; p .... ~ :c z  -\u0026lt; C..,: ~ m\n,, :\u0026lt; ~~ .... C: o::! zz om -n~ !\nl=1 :!!m m\n:o\n:o Ch Ch !JI 31:: z =i m Ch LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: September 23, 2004 To: Board of Directors  From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - September This is the fifty-ninth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for.staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. !I\u0026gt; :!: z .C... . m (J) s \u0026gt;o\" r-C\n,:,\n,:, u,\n,:, ~g \u0026gt;E ~~\n,:,Z --tU\u0026gt; z--t m\n,:,\n,:,C u,O :::c:::!\no Audit Report - September 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: September 23, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Students in Mann Magnet EAST lab have been recognized in EDTech Magazine for their work on the Life Interrupted Project. They also presented to the Rotary Club on September 1 ih presenting their film Arkansas Forgotten, the Japanese Internment Camps. The film will be entered in the Hot Springs Documentary Film Festival and has already won praise for its professionalism and content.  Most of September activities by technology staff have been routine school start up: making changes for new staff and those who have moved, supporting GradeQuick, and supporting schools with technical and instructional assistance.  Labs and rooms at the new Technology Center have been booked often by a variety of groups in the District. Principals, librarians, preK teachers, paraprofessionals and teachers coming for technology training have all made use of the rooms. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical August 26, 2004 - September 23, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. !l' az: ~ Ch ,...s n r c:\n,:,\n,:, Ch\n,:, En nc: ~E ~~\n,:,Z ~ Ch z~ m\n,:,\n,:, C: cnn :c:::! '6 0 DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 23, 2004 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D., Superintendent of Schools Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent-Curriculum and Instruction LRSD-LRCTA Partnership Agreement-National Board Certification Program to assist schools on School Improvement Status I am happy to announce that the District and the Classroom Teachers Association are collaborating on an initiative to support two teachers from each of the schools on School Improvement Status to seek certification by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. National Board Certification measures a teacher's practice against high and rigorous research-based standards. The process is an extensive series of performance-based assessments that includes teaching portfolios, student work samples, videotapes and thorough analyses of the teacher's classroom teaching and student learning. In addition, teachers must successfully complete a series of written exercises that probe the depth of their subject-matter knowledge. As a result, National Board Certified Teachers have demonstrated that they know their content area, how to teach it, and how to reach all children. The District has 28 schools that are projected to be on School Improvement List for the 2004- 05 school term, although nine of those schools did meet standards last year and can be removed from that list if they again meet standards this year. The Partnership was formed to assist these 28 schools. The Partnership between the District and the Classroom Teachers Association has three goals directed at the schools on School Improvement Status: 1) To improve teacher quality 2) To strengthen the instructional leadership team 3) To improve student achievement in mathematics and literacy We think that this Partnership will be a strong step to assist the lowest performing schools. In addition, the collaboration with the Classroom Teachers Association is a statement that we are all in this together, that responsibility and accountability for student achievement belongs with all employees of the district and, indeed, our community as a whole. A copy of the Partnership Agreement is attached. We ask that you endorse the Partnership. -- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT-LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR LOW PERFORMING SCHOOLS Brief Description: The District is undertaking a joint initiative with the Classroom Teachers Association to assist two teachers in each of the schools on school improvement status to gain National Board Certification. The District recognizes that the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) certification process can improve teacher quality through intensive professional development. An expansive study funded by the U. S. Department of Education shows that students make greater gains when taught by National Board Certified Teachers. A large number of teachers have expressed preliminary interest in this program. Goals: 1. Teacher Quality: To improve teacher quality through participation in a rigorous professional development program that is centered on standards for teaching that represent a consensus among accomplished teachers and other education experts about what accomplished teachers should know and be able to do. 2. Leadership Development: To strengthen the instructional leadership of key teachers in schools on School Improvement Status through service as a trainer of other teachers and parents. 3. Student Achievement: Process: To improve student achievement in math and literacy on the ACTAAP Exams in schools on School Improvement Status. All teachers meeting the NBPTS criteria at each of the schools on School Improvement Status will have an opportunity to apply for the program. Each teacher must complete a form provided by the district to indicate their interest in the program. The \"show of interest\" will require the teacher to respond to a writing prompt about why they want to engage in National Board Certification (limit 125-150 words). The partners will jointly conduct a lottery to select two teachers-one African-American or other minority and one Caucasian-from each school for participation in the program. Each applicant selected will receive a grant of $2300.00 to fund the cost of enrolling in the NBPTS program. If a school does not have two qualified applicants, the slots may be given to a school that is NOT on school improvement. The selected teachers must sign a contract with the LRSD agreeing to remain employed in the same school or another school that is currently on School Improvement Status in LRSD for three years after certification. (The removal of a school from School Improvement Status does not mean that a participating teacher must move to another school that is still on School Improvement Status.) Additionally, the teacher would serve on a professional development committee of the District as a trainer of other teachers and parents. The teacher would agree to offer 6 hours of professional development, consistent with state requirements under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (NCLB), once each semester. The participating teachers will be required to attend support group meetings offered by the District and/or Association during their year(s) of effort to certify and must agree to follow through on the process and offer at minimum two (2) three (3) hour workshops for teachers organized at the Association level per year. One such meeting could occur at the ABA Fall Convention. Other service options for those attempting to certify could include the following: a) Service on a LRSD/LRCT A Ad Hoc Committee appointed by Director of Staff Development or Little Rock School District b) Participation in a summer program ( 4 hours a week) involving at-risk children c) Offering of service as a supplemental provider under federal and state law to Children in their schools for 2 hours a week as a tutor Funding: The total cost of the program depends on how many schools are on Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 School Improvement Status. The District projects that 28 schools will be on school improvement for 2004-05. If each school enrolls two teachers in the NBPTS Program, the total cost would be $128,800. This District agrees to provide up to $94,300 for the program. The Association will assist with the remaining $34,500 by aiding teachers to secure funding from other sources, such as the federal candidate subsidy funding available through the Arkansas Department of Education, the National Education Association, or the Targeted High Needs Initiative (THINI) grant. Evaluation: The evaluation of the partnership will be based on:  the number of participating teachers who receive their National Board Certification from the 2004-05 list of schools on School Improvement Status\n the improvement in student achievement at each the schools on School Improvement Status that have teachers participating in the NBPTS Program\n the teacher and parent training provided by the participating teachers by number of hours of training provided and the evaluation of the training by those being trained. ---- ~\n,:,,\n,, ..,o m::c .\n.. o.,O,.o.. \u0026gt;~ men .... ~ -\u0026gt;om ~ en - Accepted for the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Mrs. Katherine Wright Knight, President Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Accepted for the Little Rock School District Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent Little Rock School District Date Date DATE: TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 September 23, 2004 Board of Education Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services THROUGH: Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent RE: Distance Learning Equipment Grant Background The Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) released the Distance Learning Equipment (OLE) Grant competition for proposals. The purpose of this grant is to provide each public school district with the opportunity to make distance learning available to every student in the state. Grant Focus Area The focus of this grant is to purchase equipment and software necessary to implement distance learning or upgrade existing equipment for more efficient operation of distance learning to assist schools in receiving advanced high school courses, advanced placement courses, enriched course content or academic courses not otherwise available in the school district. The District will partner with the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts in order to meet eligibility requirements. The District recommends that the equipment be placed at McClellan High School. Deadline for submission is October 1, 2004. Fiscal Impact The total one-year award request will be $45,000 which is the maximum amount allowed. Local match is not required. Recommendation The staff requests approval for the submission of this grant. DATE: TO: FROM: Prepared by: SUBJECT: '.54.n IndividualApproach to a World of Knowledge\" September 23, 2004 LRSD Board of Directors Dr. Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent Dr. Sadie Mitchell~sociate Superintendent A Report on the Principals' Evaluation Handbook for School Administrators You were provided a copy of the revised evaluation handbook that will be implemented for assessing the performance of principals and assistant principals for 2004-05 and sequent years. After a long and intensive year of research, discussion, revising , and collaboration, we are happy to introduce to you this evaluation handbook that focuses on six standards in accordance to the Arkansas Department of Education Administrators Licensure Standards and the Educational Leadership Consortium Council Standards. We truly believe this document represents the best thinking, research , standards, and indicators for evaluating the performance of school administrators. Two changes were made to the principals' evaluation document since the agenda meeting on September 9. The document will reflect the following revisions (see attachments): 1) Insert the words \"clean and attractive\" in the expectation for school facilities, Standard 3, Indicator 3, page 29. 2) Insert an expectation that addresses student recruitment as a vehicle for increasing school/district enrollment and diversity in Standard 5, . Indicator 2, page 32. We look forward to sharing with you in a forthcoming report about the revised appraisal system for building administrators. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 !JI (') 0 ~ ~... \u0026gt; !:i\n:c Performance Indicator . The principal demonstrates communication skills with nternal stakeholders (staf and students) in the peration of the school and understands his/her nfluence on this process. . The principal manages he school facility and equipment to ensure a afe, efficient, operation of he school. Below Basic Basic demonstrates little or no demonstrates evidence vidence of informing f informing internal internal stakeholders of takeholders of progress rogress made towards ade towards achieving chieving the vision and e vision and mission o ssion of the school e school lacks ability to discover, displays inconsistent nderstand, and verbalize ctions to discover, ccurately and respond nderstand, and mpathetically to erbalize accurately and erspectives, thoughts, espond empathetically ideas and feelings of o perspectives, thoughts, internal stakeholders ideas and feelings of internal stakeholders little or no evidence exists evidence exists that the at the needs of the school eeds of the school !ant are reported to proper facility are reported to uthorities roper authorities and ecognizes that the  mportance of aintaining a clean, ttractive, safe, and roper conditions of the chool facility is evident 29 Proficient Distinguished demonstrates evidence of evidence exists for maintaining informing internal d managing consistent and takeholders of progress made ollaborative communication owards achieving the vision ith internal stakeholders on d mission of the school and e progress toward chievement of the school's oals, vision, and mission displays actions to discover, displays positive interpersonal derstand, and verbalize ehavior, appropriately ccurately and respond esponds to internal mpathetically to takeholders, and changes erspectives, thoughts, ideas ehavior as needed nd feelings of internal takeholders evidence exists that the needsevidence exists that the needs fthe school facility are fthe school facility are eported to proper authorities eported to proper authorities, d that consistent efforts to onsistent efforts to maintain a aintain a clean, attractive, lean, attractive, safe, and afe, and proper condition of roper condition of the school e school facility are evident. facility are evident, innovative trategies are used to provide a afe and healthy physical nvironment Possible Indicators taff/Student Handbook\nnterim/Conference Records\newsletters\nBulletins\ngendas\nCalendars\nCampus eadership Records\nlassroom Observations\nonors\nReceptions\necision Making\nConsensus uilding\nSchool Climate\nTA\nStudent Council\nommunication summaries uty/Responsibility Schedule\nFire Drill Reports\nornado Drill Reports\nmergency Plans\nClean rounds\nSafe Equipment\nlean Building STANDARD 5.0: ETHICAL LEADERSHIP The principal is an educational leader who has the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Performance Indicator 1. The principal strives to ensure equity among rograms and learning pportunities for staff, tudents, and parents. . The principal demonstrates appreciation or and sensitivity to the iversity among \"ndividuals and specific opulations. Below Basic Basic Proficient Distinguished no or little evidence exists at supports that the evidence exists that the evidence exists that the evidence exists that the leader eader displays a plan but eader has implemented a plan onsistently implements a plan eader has proactive plan ith respect to equity and  consistent with the o provide equity with respect ith input from stakeholders llocation of resources to o resources, allocations, at ensures equity with respect iversity upport the plan taffing, and program o resources and allocations, evelopment taffing, and program little or no evidence exists evidence exists that the evidence exists that the hat the leader has set eader lacks leader has set and models ehavioral standards that inconsistency in setting elate to fairness, mutual e standards that relate espect, treatment of o fairness, mutual  dividuals and seldom espect, and treatment of cknowledges the value of individuals and \"fferent perspectives and ometimes acknowledge pproaches he value of different erspectives and pproaches ehavioral standards that elate to fairness, mutual espect, and treatment of thers and acknowledges ften the value of different erspectives and approaches little or no evidence exists evidence exists that the evidence exists that the at the principal has eader has inconsistently eader has actively recruited ctively recruited to ecruited to maintain a  order to maintain a diverse aintain a diverse iverse school/district chool/district student chool/district student tudent population opulation opulation 32 evelopment, as well as strives o reduce any academic isparity that exists based on ace, gender, and ocioeconomic status evidence exists that the leader as set and modeled behavioral tandards for students and staff nd acknowledges the value of ifferent perspectives and pproaches while offering ppropriate training to those ersons when needed evidence exists that the leader as actively recruited and  creased enrollment in order to aintain a diverse chool/district student opulation Possible Indicators uilding Administrator's elephone Log\norrespondence and E-mail ummaries\nAnecdotal Logs\nesponses to BCC Concerns\nchool Improvement Plan\nlimate surveys\nvisits to lassrooms limate survey\nBuilding dministrator's Telephone og\nCorrespondence and Eail summaries\nAnecdotal ogs\nResponses to BCC oncems\ncentral office eferrals\nrecruitment plan 13NNOSH3d y ')HnOS3H NVWnH \"IIIJ\\ Hlr A~10d :oNIOV3H ... ~ e \"H.UW J.:l'IHJ.NO:\u0026gt; e SH3:ll.:1.:10 ONISHnBSIO v S3:\u0026gt;IAH3S SS3NISOB \"X Date: To: From: For consideration of a Suspension of the Rules LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS September 23, 2004 Board of Education Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Prepared by: Sadie Mitchell, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, School Services Chris Heller, Attorney, Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Re: First Reading: Policy JIH - Student Searches Background: As you will recall, Attorney Chris Heller provided a report at the September agenda meeting regarding the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals on our student search procedures. We have an obligation to provide a safe and secure learning environment and we therefore have an obligation to conduct constitutionally lawful searches when necessary and appropriate. Based on your discussion, Mr. Heller has recommended implementing a Board policy that will provide for those searches to be conducted for administrative rather than for law enforcement purposes. Recommendation: I recommend first reading approval of policy JIH, Student Searches. We will return for second reading at the October board meeting. !D n 0 .z.. . ~ .n.. . \u0026gt; !:i\n:c fl 8 z ~ 0z Ch LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: JIH STUDENT SEARCHES It is the policy of the Little Rock School District Board of Education to conduct administrative searches of students for the purpose of detecting and deterring the presence of weapons and drugs in schools. In order for the District to implement an effective search policy in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, student searches will be conducted for administrative, rather than law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, to the extent this policy does not conflict with state or federal law, any contraband discovered during an administrative search of a student will subject that student to appropriate Little Rock School District administrative sanctions but will not be reported to law enforcement authorities. Any student found in possession of drugs or any contraband will be given an administrative sanction as outlined in the Little Rock Students Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. ,.,,...,,.. DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS September 23, 2004 Board ofEducatio~, i\"i Beverly Williams,~ctor, Human Resources Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with AC.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE schools are considered intern teachers. r, 0 0 z ?\n0 z en Personnel Changes Page 2 September 23, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/ferminations Certified Employees Briggs, Mona English 7-22-94 6-01 Reason: Personal MCCLELLAN 8-19-04 TCH925 Sinor, Harley Elem II 8-11-04 1-01 Reason: None Given BOOKER 9-10-04 TCH925 Woodley, Clarice 4 YR Old 9-1-89 2-17 Reason: Deceased RIGHTSELL 9-13-04 4YR925 Y earber, Susan Elem IV 8-1-02 1-13 Reason: Health TERRY 7-1-04 TCH925 New Certified Employees Allen, Ann Marie Speech 8-11-04 62-12 FOREST HGTS. TCH925 Ashley, Allan ElemV 8-16-04 6-18 FRANKLIN TCH925 Beggs, Melinda English 8-11-04 4-19 CENTRAL TCH925 Bledsoe, Fred Art 8-11-04 1-02 MCCLELLAN TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 60020.00 30040.00 49217.00 42749.00 50928.00 56209.00 annual 55330.73 prorated 28021.51 30617.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 ?- ?\u0026lt; September 23, 2004 cm -enc :e:n: cm:::Z-\nom en en - en POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL z en C\u0026gt;m NAME SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY ~~ :!!O om men ::0 en Brainard, Anne Oral Com 8-11-04 4-01 17287.50 CENTRAL TCH925 Brandon, Eric English 8-11-04 4-07 40351.00 !II 0 ALC TCH925 0 ~ ~ 0 Brown, Stephen Special Ed. 8-30-04 4-01 34575.00 ... \u0026gt; MABELV ALE EL. SPE925 annual !:i\nr 30973.44 prorated Brzezinski, April ElemV 8-11-04 1-06 34661.00 MEADOW CLIFF TCH925 f) C 0 z Cain,Mary Elem Il 8-23-04 1-04 32350.00 ~ 0z WAKEFIELD TCH925 annual en 31002.08 prorated Carter, Arrel Special Ed 8-11-04 1-06 34661.00 ALC SPE925 Casto, Mary English 8-11-04 1-13 42749.00 !=' FOREST HGTS. TCH925 .., z \u0026gt;z 0 Cleek, Phillip English 8-11-04 4-18 53061.00 ,\u0026gt;- MCCELLAN TCH925 ::0 m \"0 0 ~ Cox, Suzette Math 8-11-04 4-08 41507.00 CENTRAL TCH925 Crossley, Demetria Math 8-11-04 1-04 32350.00 CLOVERDALE MID. TCH925 ?- ~x c::: Daniel, Anita Mathll 8-11-04 1-06 34661.00 0  \u0026gt;C MCCLELLAN TCH925 gp:: c-,e mn Z\no 3:s mo ~~ 0 ~ !\"\" Personnel Changes Page 4 September 23, 2004 NAME Dorer, Christopher Duerr, Donna Farris, Alice Finger, Alex Ford, Joy Forehand, Shirley Gangluff, Tracey Gilbert, Kimberly Goodloe, Graham Gordon, Barbara Griffith, Christopher POSITION SCHOOL START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Social Studies 8-11-04 1-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Asst. Prin. 8-17-04 66-20 MCCLELLAN ADC105 Spanish 8-11-04 1-12 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Social Studies 8-11-04 1-01 MANN TCH925 English 8-11-04 1-01 CLOVERDALE MID. TCH925 Math 8-11-04 1-09 MABELV ALE MID. TCH925 Speech 8-11-04 62-12 CHICOT SPE925 Algebra I 8-11-04 2-10 CENTRAL TCH925 Special Ed 8-11-04 4-01 MABELV ALE MID. SPE925 Algebra I 8-11-04 4-13 CENTRAL TCH925 Special Ed 8-11-04 4-01 SOUTHWEST SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 30040.00 72864.00 annual 67312.46 prorated 41593 .00 30040.00 30040.00 38127.00 50928.00 40785.00 34575.00 47284.00 34575.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 ?- ?\u0026lt; September 23, 2004 oCII e-nc en: a,-\nCo: mz e-ne enn POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL Zen G'lm NAME SCHOOL END DATE o\n:o CLASS SALARY -..s :!!n nm\nm:o en en Harrison, Brenda Special Ed 9-2-04 2-16 47717.00 WlLSON SPE925 annual 43740.58 prorated ?I (\") 0 z -I Harrison, Randalyn Special Ed 8-11-04 4-09 42662.00 ~ (\") FOREST HGTS. SPE925 -I \n~z: Heatherly, Karen Math 8-11-04 4-01 34575.00 PHM TCH925 Howse, Marion Counselor 8-11-04 6-21 60020.00 ACC TCH925 f\u0026gt; 0 0 z Hunt,Henry Special Ed. 8-11-04 4-06 39196.00 ?\ni5 MABELV ALE MID. SPE925 z en Jackson, Marlo Special Ed 8-12-04 4-08 41507.00 BASELJNE SPE925 annual 41290.32 prorated Jordan, Carolyn Special Ed. 8-11-04 4-06 39196.00 FAIR SPE925 ~.., z  z Kallhoff, Tammy Spanish 8-11-04 1-01 30040.00 (\") ,\u0026gt;- CLOVERDALE MID. TCH925 ~ \"0 0 ~ Kidd, Harriett Elem IV 8-11-04 1-01 30040.00 BRADY TCH925 King, Carmelita English 8-11-04 4-06 39196.00 FAIR TCH925 .,,. ~\u0026gt;\u0026lt; Lawrence, Ryan Spanish 8-11-04 1-01 C:. 30040.00 0   0 MCCLELLAN TCH925 eenn .3 : c-\ne,mn Z\n:o 3: s mn Zm\n:: en r~r Personnel Changes Page 6 September 23, 2004 NAME Lee, Canaa Linn, Amanda Lockhart, Kelly Logan, Jacob Lowry, Joany Maher, Donna Mays, Romonda McQueen, Kay Miller, Qwyla Mitchell, A vis Nwanne, Grace POSITION SCHOOL Math CENTRAL Art PARK.VIEW Pre-Algebra PHM Am History START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 8-11-04 2-04 TCH925 8-11-04 4-13 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-02 MABELV ALE MID. TCH925 Elem I 8-18-04 1-01 CHICOT TCH925 Band 8-11-04 6-05 MABELV ALE MID. TCH925 HomeEc. 8-11-04 1-04 CLOVERDALE MID. TCHl0 Biology 8-11-04 6-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Special Ed. 8-11-04 1-02 MANN SPE925 Elem I 8-23-04 1-01 STEPHENS TCH925 Math 8-11-04 4-07 CENTRAL TCH295 ANNUAL SALARY 33582.00 47284.00 30040.00 30617.00 30040.00 41189.00 32350.00 37723.00 30617.00 30040.00 annual 27693.13 prorated 40351.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 September 23, 2004 ii\u0026gt;?\u0026lt; cDJ en~ DJ-c: Z\nom C_l)aCI,) POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL Za, C\u0026gt;m NAME SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY -o.\n,\nso :!lo om ma,\no Cl) Parr, Patricia Librarian 8-23-04 4-18 53061.00 STEPHENS LIB950 annual 48915.61 prorated ?I 0 0z Parson, Mary Biology 8-11-04 5-02 36712.00 -t ~ CENTRAL TCH925 -t \u0026gt;\n~r Pearson, William Algebra I 8-11-04 6-20 58520.00 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Phelps, Jeannine Science Specialist 8-16-04 4-19 54561.00 ROCKEFELLER TCH925 annl:lal r\u0026gt; 53708.48 C 0z prorated ~ 0z Cl) Pierce, Lizette Spanish 8-11-04 1-03 31195.00 CENTRAL TCH925 Pride, Cheryl Asst. Prin. 8-16-04 64-18 64668.00 FULBRIGHT ADC105 annual 60048.86 prorated .~,, Richardson, Keith Social Studies 8-11-04 1-05 33506.00 z \u0026gt;z CENTRAL TCH925 0 \u0026gt;,....\no .m,, Robinson, Kenya Elem IV 8-16-04 1-01 30040.00 0 ~ BASELINE TCH925 annual 29570.63 prorated Scheffer, Casey Elem III 8-25-04 1-01 30040.00 ii\u0026gt; CARVER TCH295 annual !!lx 28475.42 C:. 0  \u0026gt;C prorated a,3: Cl) -a, C\u0026gt;m Z\no 3: s mo ~~ 0 r!Sr Personnel Changes Page 8 September 23, 2004 NAME Scroggins, Tami Shertzer, Jerri Shockley, Diana Simmons, Kelly Sierra, Amber Smith, James Snow, Evelyn Stein, Karen Stogner, Alicia Teeling, Margaret POSITION SCHOOL ElemV WASHINGTON Math CENTRAL Consumer KING Special Ed. FORESTS HGTS. Science PARK.VIEW Art CENTRAL Alt. Lm. MABELV ALE MID. Music TERRY German CENTRAL Band START DATE END DATE 8-20-04 8-11-04 8-18-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-17-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 CLOVERDALE MID. SALARY CLASS 1-12 TCH925 1-15 TCH925 2-15 TCH925 1-01 SPE925 4-01 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 1-09 TCH925 4-16 TCH925 1-01 TCH295 1-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 41593.00 annual 40076.59 prorated 45059.00 46561.00 annual 45348.47 prorated 30040.00 34575.00 46215.00 38127.00 53898.00 annual 52775.12 prorated 30040.00 30617.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 September 23, 2004 POSITION NAME SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Thomas, Shauna Music 8-11 -04 FOREST HGTS. Tippen, Latonya PE 8-11-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Wagster, Gregory Special Ed. 8-11-04 MCCLELLAN Walker, Charles Life Science 8-11-04 ALC Washington, Jamie Civics 8-11-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Watkins, Cindy Spanish 8-11-04 DUNBAR Certified Promotion SALARY CLASS 1-11 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 1-08 SPE925 4-07 TCH925 1-15 TCH925 1-17 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 40438.00 32350.00 36972.00 40351.00 45059.00 47715.00 Bennett, Renee Promoted to .50 Teacher/.50 Asst. Principal at Pulaski Heights Middle Powell, Darryl Promoted to .50 Teacher/.50 Asst. Principal at Dunbar Middle School Scalici, Brenda Promoted from 9.50 mo. teacher to 11 mo. teacher position at Stephens Elementary Certified Transfer NONE f\u0026gt; 8 z ~ 0 z en Personnel Changes Page 10 September 23, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignationsfferminations Non-Certified Employees Blake, William Instr. Aide 8-19-98 33-15 Reason: Personal BASELINE 9-3-04 INA925 Blevins, Kirk Labor/Driver 9-6-00 40-08 Reason: None Given FACILITY SERV. 8-27-04 MAINT. Boyd, Misty Care 4-19-04 1-02 Reason: None Given CARE 8-19-04 CARE Brown, Derrick Custodian 3-6-01 31-06 Reason: Resigned CARVER 5-29-04 CUS925 Clegg, Earslean Instr. Aide 3-3-00 1-08 Reason: Health OTTERCREEK 8-18-04 INA185 Coats, Wanda Care 4-29-04 4-01 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE Dove, Phyllis Care 8-23-01 1-06 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE Doyne, Pamela Instr. Aide 8-28-91 33-17 Reason: Personal DODD 9-24-04 INA925 Ervin, Christin Instr. Aide 2-3-04 33-08 Reason: Resigned GIBBS 8-10-04 INA925 Farner, Rita Child Nutrition 8-13-92 10-16 Reason: Retired FAIR 10-29-04 FSMGRS Ghant, Natlyn Care 2-13-04 3-05 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 15637.00 23436.00 7.13  per hr. 13204.00 13875.00 6.25 per hr. 7.74 per hr. 16595.00 12682.00 21350.00 8.38 per hr. Personnel Changes Page 11 ?- ?\u0026lt; September 23, 2004 0 a, -en cen a,-\nc,oZm e-\u0026lt;n\"n' POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL cZ,emn NAME SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY ~~ :!!n nm\nm,o en en Gray, Cleola Bus Driver 2-2-04 3-05 13466.00 Reason: Personal TRANS. 9-8-04 BUSDRV Hall, Michelle Child Nutrition 10-31-03 3-02 9401.00 !II (\") Reason: None Given CHICOT 8-16-04 FSH550 0 z -I ~ Jackson, Felecia Care 9-3-02 3-05 8.38 -I  Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE per hr. ~\nr Jones, Valerie Care 1-29-01 1-06 7.74 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE per hr. Jordan, Christene Care 11-3-03 2-03 7.85 r, 0 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE per hr. 0 z ~ 0 MaJ eed, Nairn Care 8-26-02 1-05 7.56 z en Reason: None Given CARE 8-19-04 CARE per hr. McClendon, Marcus Care 10-25-03 2-03 7.85 Reason: None Given CARE 8-19-04 CARE per hr. Mohammed, Abdullah Custodian 8-5-03 1-01 10626.00 Reason: Leaving City MANN 5-29-04 CUS928 !.=.,' z Moland, Marvin Custodian 8-25-03 1-01 10626.00  z (\") Reason\nHealth BALE 8-31-04 CUS925 ,s.\n..\n.\n,o .m., Moore, Rosa Care 8-27-01 3-05 8.38 0 ~ Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE per hr. Palmer, Tarlisa Care 1-11-99 1-17 9.43 Reason: None Given CARE 8-18-04 CARE per hr. .,,. Scott, Ronnie Instr. Aide 10-1-03 33-13 14735.00 ~\u0026gt;\u0026lt; c Reason: Position Eliminated KING 8-10-04 INA925 0   0 gp:: c-e,mn Z\n,o 3: :S mn Zm\n::en r~r Personnel Changes Page 12 September 23, 2004 NAME Tatum, Frenchie Reason: None Given Terry, Sharmeaka Reason: None Given Tribulak, Ashley Reason: None Given Woods, Norma Reason: None Given Aaron, Adriadne Allen, Natasla Bennett, Valerie Berg, Elizabeth POSITION SCHOOL Care CARE Care CARE Care CARE Care CARE START DATE END DATE 9-25-00 8-18-04 8-14-02 8-18-04 2-9-04 8-1-04 2-5-02 8-18-04 New Non-Certified Employees Instr. Aide 8-17-04 FOREST PARK Custodian 8-31-04 CARVER Child Nutrition 8-25-04 SOUTHWEST Care 8-19-04 CARE SALARY CLASS 1-06 CARE 1-04 CARE 2-02 CARE 3-05 CARE 33-03 INA925 31-01 CUS925 3-01 FSH550 3-17 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 7.74 per hr. 7.41 per hr. 7.70 per hr. 8.38 per hr. 10934.00 annual 10697.59 prorated 5689.50 annual 5318.45 prorated 9350.00 annual 9048.39 prorated 10.36 per hr. Personnel Changes Page 13\nt\u0026gt; ?\u0026lt; September 23, 2004 oD:J - C: 13 ~ :C:,:: ,zm en en -CJ\u0026gt; Zen POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL C'\u0026gt;m ~~ NAME SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY nm:!me!nn\n,:, en Brown, Dewayne Custodian 8-23-04 31-01 5689.50 BALE CUS925 annual 5503.97 !II prorated n 0 .z.. . Brown, Dorothy Instr. Aide 9-7-04 33-13 14735.00 .~... STEPHENS INA925 annual \u0026gt; ~ 12823.43\nr prorated Brown, Shari Child Nutrition 8-26-04 3-01 9350.00 DUNBAR FSH550 annual ~ 8998.12 0 0 prorated z ?\n5z Burns, Lenette Clerical 8-11-04 en 31-12 20184.00 CENTRAL CLK925 Campbell, Paul Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 14735.00 DODD INA925 Carbo, Haywood Custodian 8-23-04 31-01 14532.00 CIITCOT CUS12 annual !=' 12243.98 ..., z \u0026gt; prorated z n \u0026gt; r-\n,:, Deadmon, Capresha Trainee 8-16-04 2-01 13330.00 m.., 0 CIITLD NUTRITION FSMEAL annual ~ 13118.41 prorated DeJ arnette, Karen Administrator 9-20-04 75-15 82116.00 PR\u0026amp;E ADMN12 annual\nt\u0026gt; CJ)_ 63722.02 -tX C:. 0\u0026gt; prorated ),,0 eenn\n.\n: -u, CZ'\n\u0026gt;,m:,\n: s mo Zm\n:\nen ~ !\" Personnel Changes Page 14 September 23, 2004 NAME Dillard-McCray, Jacqueline Dobbins, Malinda Eichelberger, Rita Gem1any, Lisa Randie, Dennis Harris, Vivian Harvell, Lola Hawkins, Tonya Hohnes, Antjonne Jackson, Mary POSITION SCHOOL Trainee START DATE END DATE 8-3-04 CHILD NUTRITION Instr. Aide 8-16-04 FOREST HGTS. Instr. Aide 9-8-04 BOOKER Child Nutrition 8-17-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Security Officer 8-16-04 ROMINE Care 8-30-04 CARE Care 8-19-04 CARE Clerical 8-23-04 FOREST HGTS. Care 8-19-04 CARE Child Nutrition 8-17-04 FAIR SALARY CLASS 2-01 FSMEAL 33-03 INA925 33-08 INA925 3-01 FSH550 36-14 SOFR9 1-07 CARE 3-08 CARE 39-11 CLKlO 2-10 CARE 3-01 FSH550 ANNUAL SALARY 13330.00 10934.00 annual 10756.96 prorated 12682.00 annual 11379.52 prorated 9350.00 17414.00 7.89 per hr. 8.85 per hr. 24876.00 annual 23160.41 prorated 8.95 per hr. 9350.00 Personnel Changes Page 15\n,- ?\u0026lt; September 23, 2004 olll (-1)(C1): ID-C: z\n:om (1)(1) _Cl) z(I) POSITION START DATE SALARY ANNUAL Cl m ~~ NAME SCHOOL END DATE CLASS SALARY :!!O mom(I)\n:o Cl) Johnson, Dorothy Child Nutrition 8-25-04 3-01 9350.00 STEPHENS FSH550 annual 9048.39 !\" prorated 0 0 .z. . Jones, Deborah Care 8-30-04 1-06 7.74 ~ .0. . CARE CARE per hr. \u0026gt; !:i\n,: Jones, Taneadra Care 8-30-04 2-02 7.70 CARE CARE per hr. Kriz, Lori Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-04 11253.00 f\u0026gt; FULBRIGHT INA925 0 0 z ~ Lynch, Christine Child Nutrition 8-17-04 3-01 9350.00 5 z BALE FSH550 Cl) Lynch, Mary Care 8-30-04 1-07 7.89 CARE CARE per hr. McReynolds, Ashley Care 8-19-04 2-05 8.18 CARE CARE per hr. !::l Meaderds, Catherine Child Nutrition 8-17-04 3-01 9350.00 ..., z \u0026gt; BRADY FSH550 z 0 ,\u0026gt;-\n:o Mitchell, Tolice Care 8-30-04 1-03 7.28 .m., 0 CARE CARE per hr. ~ Mullins, Michael Meal Tech 8-23-04 42-01 20184.00 CHILD NUTRITION AN12 annual 17177.87 prorated\n,- Cl)_ --.x C:  Murphy, Demetria Custodian o:,,. 8-13-04 31-01 11379.00 :,,.o Cl)\n: MCCLELLAN CUS928 Cl) - (I) Clm ~~ mo Zm ~(I) ~ tr Personnel Changes Page 16 September 23, 2004 NAME Nanduri, Venna Perry, Tarsha Poole, Gregory Porchia, Kasey Privett, Reanetta Reed, Kelly Senter, Amelia Shavers, Patricia Sims, Katina POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide FOREST HGTS. Instr. Aide HENDERSON Instr. Aide BRADY Instr. Aide SOUTHWEST Instr. Aide CIDCOT Care CARE Care CARE Care CARE Child Nutrition DUNBAR START DATE END DATE 8-12-04 8-12-04 8-18-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-30-04 8-19-04 8-30-04 8-26-04 SALARY CLASS 33-13 INA925 33-13 INA925 33-13 INA925 33-13 INA925 33-03 INA925 3-17 CARE 1-05 CARE 1-05 CARE 3-01 FSH550 ANNUAL SALARY 14735.00 14735.00 annual 14655.35 prorated 14735.00 annual 14336.76 prorated 14735.00 10934.00 10.36 per hr 7.56 per hr 7.56 per hr. 9350.00 annual 8998.12 prorated Personnel Changes Page 17 September 23, 2004 POSITION NAME SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY Smith, Shaun Sobba, Earle Thomas, Tasha Thompson, Leasha Tyler, Linda Zapata, Angelica Black, Donald Jackson-Ayers, Lenora Sanders, Chestine Trainee 8-17-04 CHILD NUTRITION Child Nutrition FAIR Instr. Aide MEADOW CLIFF Bus Driver TRANS. Child Nutrition FOREST HGTS. Child Nutrition CHICOT 8-17-04 8-31-04 8-17-04 8-17-04 8-19-04 Non-Certified Promotion 2-01 FSMEAL 3-01 FSH550 33-13 INA925 3-05 BUSDRV 3-01 FSH550 3-01 FSH550 13330.00 annual 13118.41 prorated 9350.00 14735.00 annual 13619.92 prorated 13466.00 9350.00 9350.00 annual 9249.46 prorated Promoted from Building Engineer to HV AC Trade Specialist at Facility Services Promoted from Instr. Aide to Parent Coor. at Geyer Springs Elementary Promoted from Building Engineer to Custodial Supervisor at Facility Services !l' n .0z.. . ~ \u0026gt; ~\nr ~ C 0z ?\ni5 z Cl) TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: Background LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Board of Directors Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent Administrative Services Student Assignment Committee Assignment Plan Recommendation September 23, 2004 On September 13, 2002, the District Court granted LRSD partial unitary status, finding that the District had substantially complied with the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") in all areas except  2. 7 .1. The Revised Plan incorporated a number of race-based student assignment policies as a part of the District's effort to eliminate the vestiges of its past discrimination. LRSD's being declared unitary changes the analysis with regard to the constitutionality of the LRSD's intra-district race-based student assignment policies and requires a change in the student assignment plan. On December 18, 2003, a student assignment plan was approved for one year (2004-05). It included a weighted random assignment process, utilizing the characteristics of race ( as a factor), achievement test performance and economic status (free-and-reduced lunch). The adopted 2004-05 Little Rock School District Student Assignment Plan recognizes attendance zone school precedence\nhowever, additional attention and focus were developed with the intent to provide both an educational choice option and maintain student diversity (to the extent practicable). Providing students and their families with school choice is a key component of the student assignment plan. School Choice is viewed as a healthy method of encouraging students to take advantage of unique curriculum offerings, special emphasis and program activities. fl C 0z ~ 0 z \"' ~ 0 5 \"z' C)\n:u m I The Board also appointed a school district-wide committee, whose charge was to:  Hold community-wide (LRSD) meetings to obtain additional parent, staff and community input.  Seek additional expert consultation and study.  Advise the Board regarding citizen's views and opinions pertaining to a longrange student assignment plan.  Observe and examine the 2004-05 student assignment process, the new applicant pool and resultant findings. Recommendation It is recommended that the Board of Education adopt the attached Student Assignment Committee recommendation. (Attachment) Final Report Little Rock School District Student Assignment Plan Committee Each member of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District appointed two individuals to serve on the Little Rock School District Student Assignment Plan Committee for Specialty Magnet Schools (Central, Fair, Hall, McClellan, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar, Henderson, Mabelvale Middle, King, Rockefeller Early Childhood, Romine, Washington). The specific \"charge\" given the committee was to:  Observe and examine the 2004-05 student assignment process, new applicant pool and resultant findings\n Seek additional expert consultation and study\n Hold community-wide (LRSD) meetings to obtain additional parent, staff and community input\nand  Advise the LRSD Board of Directors regarding citizen's views and opinions pertaining to a long-range student assignment plan. The Committee members were: Co-Chairs Michael Daugherty, LRSD Board Member Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent - Administrative Services 1. Patty Barker 2. Lisa Black 3. Tom Brock 4. Jody Carreiro 5. Tommy Hodges 6. Duane Jackson 7. Mallory Jewell 8. Freeman McKindra 9. Juan Vasques 10. Alma Viscarra 11. Diane Vibhakar 12. Connie Whitfield 13. Carol Young The Committee met on three occasions (6-2-04 / 6-08-04 / 8-31-04) to discuss the committee charge, review resource material and determine the best process to accomplish the charge. It was determined that three community-wide forums would be held to obtain parent, staff and community input. The dates, locations and attendance, including staff and commit.tee members were as follows: 1. July 20, 2004 - Neighborhood Resource Center - 28 attendees 2. July 29, 2004 - Dee Brown Library- 21 attendees 3. August 10, 04 - LRSD Board Room - 32 attendees !D 0 .0z.. . .~... \u0026gt; ~ ?= fl 0 0z ~ i5 z en ?:S 0 5 en z C\u0026gt;\n:o m ~ ~ en Student Assignment Committee Report Page 2 A similar format was used at each community forum. A brief background of the issue was presented followed by a two-part discussion. Participants were asked to share with the group their experiences with the current student assignment plan. Was it a positive experience and if so what worked best? If the experience was not positive, what did not work? The discussion then focused on the criteria of the current plan and whether or not changes needed to be made. A list of criteria being considered in other school districts was provided. A compilation of these comments can be found in the Community Forum Summary of this report. The Committee met at the conclusion of the community forums to consider the discussions and prepare a recommendation for the board members. That recommendation can be found in the Committee Recommendation section of this report. Community Forum Summa!)' Patron experience with the 2004-2005 plan was generally positive in regard to satisfaction with student placement. Individual instances of dissatisfaction occurred due to the inverse criteria at a particular school working to the detriment of an applicant. It was pointed out that the inverse criteria will vary from school to school and staff explained how those criteria are determined. Overall there was a positive expression of intent to keep both choice and diversity for the specialty magnets and that the current plan provides the best opportunity for both. During each forum there was discussion concerning the reason for the magnet programs. This discussion was generally followed by expressions that every school be desirable. If all neighborhood schools operated at a proficient level of excellence, parents would be more inclined to support their neighborhood school. One of the most impassioned topics of discussion was patron information, understanding and navigation of the placement system. This communication issue, along with several other topics, was not within the charge to the committee. These topics are covered in the Suggestions for Future Consideration part of this report. In each forum, criteria for placement were discussed along with additional attributes that could be considered. It was generally thought that the current system was as fair as possible. Committee Discussion The committee discussed using academic achievement as a direct basis instead of as an inverse basis and giving it heavier weight. It was not adopted and determined to be detrimental to less advantaged students. Incorporating any of the additional academic attributes [GPA, 35% percentile in math and literacy, top 20% of class, 30% (outside zone) by overall score rank order] would only further complicate an already complicated system. Citizenship criteria (attendance criteria, no more than X number of absences, or no more than X number of tardies) were also considered. The inclusion of any would also further complicate the system as well as work to the detriment of a specific group. Student Assignment Committee Report Page 3 English proficiency status, longevity within LRSD, gender and geographic diversity were discussed but not recommended for inclusion in any change. Committee Recommendation After considering the discussions of LRSD parents, staff and the community, the Committee recommends that the current 2004-2005 student assignment plan be retained with no changes at this time, with the exception of attendance zone students retaining priority and Rockefeller Early Childhood program. At Rockefeller, a numbered waiting list will be utilized for Rockefeller Early Childhood program as opposed to a weighted pool providing parents with more definite information on child care placement. Suggestions for Future Consideration ___ _ The recommendation of the Committee responds to the charge given in May of 2004. However, during the community forums and subsequent committee discussions, a pattern emerged regarding some issues related to student placement but which were outside the charge to the Committee. These are presented to the Board with the strongest encouragement for action from this Committee. These concerns and suggestions for consideration/action are: 1. In order to better attract and keep patrons in the District, the assignment process must be easy to navigate.  Make the system more user friendly  Improve communication channels regarding assignment policies  Add/improve sources of assistance when seeking information  Develop a brochure explaining the student assignment process and choice options 2. Study the purpose and effects of specialty magnet programs, including resource allocation and program assessment. 3. Continue to strengthen neighborhood schools. 4. Establish a system for tracking students who do not get their preferred placement. Determine if they remain in the District. 5. Since data and choice demands will vary each year, the Student Assignment process for Specialty Magnet Schools should be reviewed annually to report outcomes. f\u0026gt; 8 z !i iz5 \"' ?:S n 5 \"z' C)\na m I \"' ~n Individual Approach to a World ef Knowledge\" September 23, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: ~ Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Disbursing Officers Act 671 of2003 amended Arkansas Code 6-13-618 and requires the Board of Directors to designate, by resolution adopted by majority vote, one (1) of its members to serve as the primary board disbursing officer of the District and may designate one (1) member as an alternate Board disbursing officer in the absence of the primary Board disbursing officer. It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the attached Resolution designating the Board President as the primary disbursing officer for the Board and the Board Vice-President as the alternate disbursing officer for the Board. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 ' !II 0 0 ~ ! 0 -4 \u0026gt; =i :l: r, C 0\n0z en !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n ~\na m c3 ~ ~ 0 5 ezn G)\na m I en RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DISBURSING OFFICERS FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR 2004-2005 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors shall designate at the first regular meeting following the annual school election one (1) of its members who shall serve as the primary Board disbursing officer as required by Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-618\nand WHEREAS, the Board of Directors may designate one (1) or more Board members as an alternate Board disbursing officer in the absence of the designated primary Board disbursing officer as provided by Ark. Code Ann. 6- 13-618\nNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County designates the President of the Board as the primary disbursing officer of the District and the Vice-President of the Board as the alternate disbursing officer of the District in the absence of the President of the Board. President Vice-President Adopted: Date: To: From: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS September 23, 2004 Board of Education Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Agreement for Contracted Services Background: The Board previously agreed by consensus to move forward with the Superintendent's Entry Plan and the recommended audit of the District's organizational structure. Mr. Robert Klempen and Dr. Dennis Smith will present the preliminary findings of their document review and make recommendations for the Board's consideration. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board authorize the Superintendent to enter into a contract for the services described in the attached contract. f\u0026gt; 0 0z ~ iz5 Ch AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES (this \"Agreement\") is made and entered into as of the 23rd day of September, by and between the LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT (the \"District\") and Robert Klempen and Dennis Smith, (\"Contractors\"). A. The District desires for Contractors to provide the services described in the Statement of Work to be Performed section of this Agreement for the cost set forth in this Agreement and subject to the other terms and provisions of this Agreement. B. Contractors have represented to the District that they have the knowledge and expertise to perform the Services for the price specified in this Agreement. C. The District and Contractors desire to enter into this Agreement to set forth their agreements with respect to the services to be provided by Contractors as well as the compensation to be paid Contractors by the District. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the District and Contractors hereby agree as follows: 1. Statement of Work to be Performed - Purpose: To provide the Superintendent with an independent and objective audit of the school district organization and staffing. The audit will focus on the organization's effectiveness and efficiency by identifying and clarifying problem areas and making recommendations for improving structure and staffing. This work is intended to guide the district in addressing the following issues:  Increasing academic achievement for all students  Achieving compliance with the final court order to gain full unitary status  Improving efficiency and effectiveness withirl the organization  Reducing unnecessary bureaucracy and redundancy  Assessing facility and maintenance \u0026amp; operation needs  Determining opportunities for enhancing community support for the schools 1 Project Services and Deliverable: The services include:  Independent interviews conducted with key district and community leaders, staff and selected student leadership gaining strategic, technical and political insights  Consolidation and analysis of all gathered data  Preparation of written executive report and supporting exhibits  Face-to-face debriefing with Superintendent and other leaders as determined by the Superintendent The deliverable will be:  An executive report will highlight and emphasize organizational strengths, areas of need and recommendations for improvement of the organization's structure and staffing. Project Timing:  On September 23, 2004 the audit team leadership will meet with the Superintendent and School Board\n Data gathering will commence immediately and will be completed by the end of January, 2005\n Data analyzed and draft recommendations prepared by the end of February, 2005\n Executive Report presented to the Superintendent and School Board in March, 2005. Project Personnel: Bob Klempen  President ofK.lempen \u0026amp; Associates, LLC, a Southern California based organization working nationally to improve school organizations through the successful resolution of the most challenging issues facing school leaders today  Has worked as a school administrator in Wisconsin, Florida and California and, in addition, served as an executive in the private sector  Served as the Deputy Superintendent for the Orange County Public Schools-Orlando, Florida and, along with Dennis Smith, led a restructuring effort that transformed a slowmoving bureaucracy into a dynamic, responsive decentralized organization 2 f\u0026gt; C 0\n0z en ?::S 0 5 en z C\u0026gt;\n:o m ~ ~ en Dennis Smith  An educator for 30 years serving as superintendent for the past 18 years in five uniquely different school districts in Florida (Orange County Public Schools in Orlando) and California ... currently as superintendent of the Placentia-Yorba Linda School District  Has established a reputation of focusing on student learning and achievement and has a history of consistent academic gain for students  A leader known to mobilize vast resources available to school districts in reaching board goals and successfully increasing public support and confidence in education ... evidenced by successful school bond measures and Redevelopment Agency engagement  Named one of the top 100 educators in North America Roles \u0026amp; Responsibilities: Bob Klempen will provide leadership to an audit team of independent consultants. fu this capacity, he will cooperate and work with other outside consultants under independent contract with the District, including Dennis Smith. As such, he will work directly with and report to Roy Brooks, Superintendent. Other district leaders may be engaged in a variety of support activities with the knowledge and approval of the Superintendent. Dennis Smith will provide leadership to an audit team of independent consultants. fu this capacity, he will cooperate and work with other outside consultants under independent contract with the District, including Robert Klempen. As such, he will work directly with and report to Roy Brooks, Superintendent. Other district leaders may be engaged in a variety of support activities with the knowledge and approval of the Superintendent. 2. Nature and Scope of Engagement - The District hereby retains Contractors to perform the Services and the District agrees to pay for the Services as provided in Section 4. The Contractors accept the engagement to perform the Services and agree to provide such services to the District, all as set forth herein. Contractors will not subcontract or otherwise engage subcontractors to perform the Services without prior written approval from the District. 3. 31, 2005. Term - The term of this Agreement shall be September 23, 2004 through March 4. Compensation. The total fee for the consultant transitional team Services will be $50,000 payable $27,500 to Robert Klempen and $22,500 to Dennis Smith. Each consultant will invoice the school district separately according to the following schedule: 20% of the their respective fee at the end of October and December, 2004 and February, 2005 with the remaining balance of 40% invoiced at the completion of the project in March, 2005. Travel, lodging, meals and other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses will be billed separately as incurred by each consultant. The total project Services fee will not exceed $50,000 unless the scope of the project is changed in writing by Roy Brooks. When travel expenses are paid by Little Rock School District, the consultants will work exclusively on the LRSD required Services. 3 5. Independent Contractor - Contractors agree that they are independent Contractors in performing the Services. As independent Contractors, Contractor's duties are limited as provided in this Agreement, and they do not have, and agree they will not hold themselves out as having, any authority to represent or obligate the District as an officer, employee or agent. 6. Indemnification and Legal Compliance - The Contractors shall at all times observe and fully comply with any and all Federal, State and local laws, statutes, orders, ordinances and regulations. Contractors agrees to save, hold harmless and to indemnify the District, its agents, employees, officers and board members against any and all liability, losses, claims or costs of whatsoever kind or nature relative to the performance of this Agreement or any occurrence or accident in connection with inadequate design, breach of contract, material failure, default or the performance of any work, services or products supplied pursuant to this Agreement. Further, Contractors shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District, its agents, employees, officers and board members from any lawsuits, causes of action, claims, liabilities and damages, of any kind and nature, including but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of the performance of this Agreement whether attributable in whole or in part to any act, omission or negligence of the District, its agents or employees, including, but not limited to, any and all lawsuits, causes of action, claims, liabilities, and damages which the District, its agents or employees may sustain by reason of any failure of Contractors to indemnify as provided herein\nor any failure by Contractors to otherwise perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement, or by reason of the injury to or death of any person or persons or the damage to, loss of use of or destruction of any property resulting from the work undertaken herein. 7. Conflict oflnterest - Contractors represent and warrant that no director or employee of the District is in any manner interested directly or indirectly in this Agreement or in any of the expected profits which might arise from this Agreement. Contractors further represent and warrant that no attempt has been made to influence or gain favorable advantage by communicating directly or indirectly with any official of the District. 8. Civil Rights Act Compliance\nNo Discrimination- Contractors agree that they will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the Department of Education (34 C.F .R. Part 100) issued pursuant to that title. Contractors further agree that they shall not discriminate against, or segregate, a person or group of persons on account ofrace, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, national origin, ancestry, disability or condition of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related complex in carrying out their duties and obligations pursuant to this Agreement nor shall Contractors or any person claiming under or through Contractors establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation. In the event the District permits subcontracting under this Agreement, Contractors agree to include provisions similar to the foregoing in any subcontracts entered into 4 f' 0 0 ~ 6z Cl) i':S n 5 Cl) z C) RI 51: ~ Cl) between Contractors and any Subcontractor. Contractors assure the District that they will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate the foregoing provisions of this Agreement. Contractors further agree to comply with all other applicable requirements of federal, state and local laws, ordinances or regulations regarding nondiscrimination in employment. 9. Termination - This Agreement may be terminated for cause by either party in the event a representation or warranty set forth herein is untrue in any material respect. This Agreement may also be terminated in the event there is any breach of a material provision of this Agreement which is not cured within ten (10) days following written notice to the defaulting party. Contractor's representations and warranties shall survive any termination of this Agreement. In the event of termination for cause, either party shall have all rights and remedies available under Arkansas law or applicable federal law. The District may also terminate without cause with 30 days written notice to the Contractors. In this case, the District will only be liable for pro-rata amounts and incurred travel due the Contractors through the date of termination. 10. Examination of Contractors Records - The District shall have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of Contractors involving transactions relating to this Agreement at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement as well as for a period of three (3) years following the termination of this Agreement. 11. Miscellaneous - 11.1 Severability - If a court holds any part, term or provision of this Agreement to be unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain the objectionable part, term or provision. 11.2 Headings - The headings which appear in this Agreement have been inserted for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. They are not intended to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of any provision hereof. 11.3 Entire Agreement - This Agreement has been negotiated and prepared by the parties equally and shall not be construed as having been drafted by one party. When fully executed, it shall supercede any and all prior and existing Agreements, either oral or in writing. This Agreement (including any exhibits) contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 11.4 Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals - In the event there is a Request for Qualifications or Request for Proposals attached to this Agreement, such document shall be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 5 11.5 Amendments - Any amendment or modification of this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by the parties to this Agreement. 11.6 Assignment - This Agreement is not assignable by either party without the prior consent of the other party. 11.7 Governing Law and Jurisdiction - The laws of the State of Arkansas shall govern the parties' rights and obligations under this Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement was negotiated in the State of Arkansas and agree that any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in the State of Arkansas. 11.8 Attorneys' Fees and Costs - If any suit or other proceeding is instituted by either party pertaining to this Agreement or the obligations hereunder, the prevailing party, in addition to any other relief the court may award, shall be entitled to its costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. 11.9 Notice - Any notice, consent, request or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when either (i) personally delivered to the intended recipient, or (ii) sent, by certified or registered mail, return-receipt requested, addressed to the intended recipient at the addresses specified below their signatures on the signature page of this Agreement. 6 fl C 0 ! 6z en i!S 0 5 en z C\u0026gt; ::0 m ~ i'\ni IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date set forth above. THE DISTRICT: Little Rock School District By: (print) Name: --------- Title: Superintendent Signature: Address for Notice: 810 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 7 CONTRACTORS: By: (print) Name: _______ _ Title: ---------- Signature: Address for Notice: By: (print) Name: ---------- Title: ---------- Signature: ________ _ Address for Notice: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: September 23, 2004 Board of Education FROM: ~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: School/Department Central High School Cloverdale Middle School Cloverdale Middle School Dodd Elementary School Forest Heights Middle School $200.00 cash to be applied toward the completion of the reflecting pool Framed abstract painting, valued at approximately $500.00, to enhance the Parent Resource Center Crystal lamp, valued at approximately $50.00, to enhance the Parent Resource Center Services, valued at approximately $200.00, for designing school stage $750.00 cash to the athletic department to sponsor five (5) students to the U of A Football Camp Donor Mr. Michael J. Porter Mrs. Dorothy Davis Mrs. Yadhira Maglione Mr. Earnest L. Duckery, Architect, Woods-Carradine Firm Convenience Stores Plus, Inc dba Big Ben Truck Stop Board of Education September 23, 2004 Page 2 School/Department Item Donor Forest Park $1,368.81 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Staff Appreciation Forest Park $1,000.00 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Principal's Discretionary Fund Forest Park $11,894.34 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School art instruction and materials Forest Park $1,668.46 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School computer maintenance Forest Park $1,976.93 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School grounds expense Forest Park $2,000.00 cash for Forest Park Elementary PTA Elementary School Space Camp Forest Park $14,169.18 cash for Forest Park Elementary PTA Elementary School Spanish instruction and materials Forest Park $1,942.07 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Student Recognition/ Accelerated Reader Program Forest Park $937.58 cash for Parent Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Involvement/Field Day Forest Park $539.50 cash for Parent Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Involvement/Fifth Grade Graduation Forest Park $1,189.57 cash for Forest Park Elementary PT A Elementary School Parent Involvement/ Student Recruitment Metropolitan Career 2004 GMC/Chevrolet General Motors Corporation and Technical Center 271 Off-Road Pickup, valued at $15,951.89, for instructional use in the Auto Tech Program Board of Education September 23, 2004 Page 3 School/Department Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School Item $500.00 cash for use in furnishing the new Parkview Field House Donor Pat Carlton It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 DATE: TO: FROM: Fax 501-447-1401 8/30/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT A CY ROUS EAU, PRI CIPAL 1)~ SUBJECT: DO A TIO \\ Mr. Michael J. Porter of 813 Moss Road, Memphis, TN \\ 38117-5204, graciously donated $200.00 to Central High School. His request is the money go toward the completion of the reflecting pool. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL August 20, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Angela Munns RE: Donation Please accept one 3 'x 4' Framed Abstract Painting and one Crystal Lamp donated to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School to enhance our Parent Resource Center. Mrs. Dorothy Davis 46 Maryton Park Cove Little Rock, AR 72204 Mrs. Yadhira Maglione 4419 Old Oak Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Framed Abstract Painting Approximate Value $500.00 Crystal Lamp $50.00 RECEIVED AUG 2 3 2004 6300 Hinkson Road  Phone (501) 44 7-2500  Fax (501) 447-2501  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \"Together - building a better tomorrow, one child at a time\" Date: August 25, 2004 To: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management From: Faith McLaughlin, principal ~ Subject: Donation Mr. Earnest L. Duckery, an architect with the Woods - Carradine Firm has generously donated his expertise for the design of a school stage to David 0. Dodd Elementary School. His services were estimated at $200.00. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordanc3e with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED AUG 2 6 200, PROCURENrt:.'~l 6423 Stagecoach Road  Phone 455-7 430 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 FOREST HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Elouise J. Hudson Principal Date: July 22, 2004 RE: Donation Convenience Stores Plus, INC. DBA Big Ben Truck Stop, 3102 W. 34th St., Suite 3, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, wishes to donate $750.00 to Forest Heights Athletic Department to sponsor 5 students to the University of Arkansas Football Camp. It is recommended this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED JUL 2 6 2004 PROCUREf,,ENT 5901 Evergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-2700  Fax (501) 447-2701  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 ~ :!S\n,,\n= 3: \u0026gt; \"II E!5 o-\u0026lt; c:m\nom z::c 3:~ m\n:o z--\u0026lt; Z C\u0026gt; ~ 0 5 \"z' C\u0026gt;\n:o m ~ ~ \"' FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO. FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: DARRAIDLPARADIS DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT THERESA KETCHER, PRINCIPAL OF FOREST PARK SCHOOL AUGUST 17, 2004 DONATI ONS The Forest Park Elementary PTA has donated $38,686.44 to the school for the following: Staff Appreciation 1,368.81 Principal's Discretionary Fund 1,000.00 Classroom Supplies, Instruction \u0026amp; Maintenance Art Instruction \u0026amp; Materials 11 ,894.34 Computer Maintenance 1,668.46 Grounds Expenses 1976.93 Space Camp 2,000.00 Spanish Instruction \u0026amp; Materials 14,169.18 Student Recognition Accelerated Reader Program 1942.07 Parental Involvement Field Day Fifth Grade Graduation Student Recruitment 937.58 539.50 1,189.57 It is recommended that these donations be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. /pl 1600 Nortr Tyler Street  (501) Phone 447-4500  Fax (501) 447-4501 \" Littie Rock, Arkansas 72207 TO: FROM: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Michael Peter~ncipal Metropolitan Career \u0026amp; Technical Center DATE: August 17, 2004 SUBJECT: DONATIONS Please accept the following vehicles donated to Metropolitans Auto Technical Program. The vehicles will be used as instructional items and will not be licensed or driven: A 2004GMC Chev Pick-Up 271 OffRoad Ext. 4X4 Color-Red Valued: $15,951.89 Donator: General Motor Donations VIN: IGTEK19T34E272070 We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies, and procedures of the Little Rock School District. REC\\VED AUG 1 S 2~M PROCURE.W'it\\\\ll Metropolitan Career-Technical Center 7701ScottHamiltonDrive  LitUeRock,Arkansas 72209  (501)447-1200  Fax(501)447-1201 Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2501 BARROW ROAD Date: To: From: Subject: PHONE (501) 447-2300 FAX (501) 447-2301 August 26, 2004 Darral Paradis, Director LRSD Procurement Department Dr. Linda Brown, Principal --le_ Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School Donation for Parkview Field House Needs LI'ITLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72204 Pat Carlton recently donated $500 for use in furnishing the new Parkview Field House. We, at Parkview, would like to say a very hearty Thank You! Your support is appreciated more than we can express. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED AUG 2 7 2004 PROCUfJ1f }\\{ ,_i ff' b .... \"'' .,....J f DATE: TO: THROUGH: Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 September 23, 2004 Little Rock School District Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, ED. D., Superintendent of Schools PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services~ , Subject , Summary , Objectives , Expected Outcomes , Population/Location , Budget Amount/Source , Manager , Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending August 31, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA , Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board. , Other Agencies Involved None . Expectations of District NI A . Needed Staff NIA , Comments None , Recommendation Approval of the August 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. j LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 08/31 /03 COLLECTED 2004/05 08/31/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 10,520,580 18.28% 61,436,691 11 ,348,516 18.47% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 527,648 5.22% 12,135,000 677,843 5.59% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 28,873 7.60% 485,000 4,443 0.92% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 36,679 18.34% 245,000 62,030 25.32% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 215,000 1,255 0.58% TOTAL 98,607,800 11,113,781 11.27% 106,311,691 12,094,087 11.38% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% REVENUE- STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 4,838,739 9.09% 65,082,694 5,916,608 9.09% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 590,749 9.09% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141,165 REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 8,275,000 693,763 8.38% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 114,835 8.20% 1,350,000 105,026 7.78% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 2,100,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 5,542,510 98,127 1.77% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 4,125,000 INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 4,575,000 ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 934,380 POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 TOTAL 74,776,187 5,221,060 6.98% 102,522,882 7,893,730 7.70% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 1,295,000 TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752.430 0 0.00% 3,914,008 0 0.00% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING ' 177,157,418 16,340,262 9.22% 212,770,581 19,993,461 9.40% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 797,161 3.31% 21 ,531,929 1,786,067 8.29% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 15,800 0.40% 4,500,000 17,299 0.38% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 27,964,934 1,062,586 3.80% TOTAL 52,765,141 812,961 . - 1.54% 53,996,863 2,865,951 5.31% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 17,153,222 7.46% 266,767,444 22,859,412 8.57% I ..---- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2003 AND 2004 ~ APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 08/31/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 08/31/04 EXPENDED E)(PENSES \"sAlARIES 100,684,982 4,497,431 4.47% 117,324,912 5,074,084 4.32% ~FITS 26,483,772 1,407,317 5.31% 36, 185,811 1,642,991 4.54% \"pURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 1,809,458 9.18% 20,959,918 1,628,868 7.77% \"MAfERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 866,525 10.59% 8,725,914 1,211,841 13.89% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 3,435 0.22% 2,760,600 197,315 7.15% QTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 47,886 0.57% 10,770,418 48,474 0.45% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,705,779 38.90% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 13,337,831 7.53% 209,202,382 14,394,406 6.88% -EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 1,131 ,685 4.34% 23,853,134 1,525,088 6.39% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 582,601 14.57% 5,007,809 403,090 8.05% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 709,338 2.87% 27,964,934 873,540 3.12% - TOTAL 54,745,544 2,423,624 4.43% 56,825,877 2,801,718 4.93% - TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 15,761,455 6.80% 266,028,259 17,196,124 6.46% - INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1,954,984) 1,391,766 739,184 5,663,287 - BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531,706 6,531,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 1,947,916 1,176,943 4,070,190 OPERATING 9,052,274 12,029,286 10,099,905 12,130,761 TOTAL 10,630,451 13,977,202 11,276,848 16,200,951 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 08-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 o.oo SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 14,937.21 69,969.00 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 1,499,657.55 1,333,279.66 3,255,583.28 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541.25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591.92 305,914.50 313,896.02 6,947,781 .40 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 2,208,884.56 3,422,127.48 7,735,703.00 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 83,872.80 349,178.27 2,279,750.39 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 80,000.00 4,113,266.62 5,418,481.43 20,324,185.12 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (80,000.00) 14,063,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 279,752.73 5,317,190.68 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 279,752.73 (80,000.00) 0.00 0.00 21,125,041.42 GRAND TOTAL !191i5HWZJ l :123 129 92 2.22 :11Hi l!i!i ~ ~1 5~111911 511 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2004 PROJECT ENDING ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 08-31-04 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 THRU 08-31-04 THRU 08-31-04 SUBTOTAL 08-31-04 ADMINISTRATION 753,846.55 889,772.32 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 114,896.16 14,937.21 0.00 683,877.55 69,969.00 NEW WORK PROJECTS 38,786,097.95 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 15,993,062.06 1,499,657.55 1,333,279.66 35,530,514.67 3,255,583.28 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 109,609.73 27,732.73 0.00 0.00 251,272.93 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 9,012.76 0.00 0.00 4,862,548.33 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR . 18,920,386.34 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,887,763.72 305,914.50 313,896.02 11,972,604.94 6,947,781.40 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,641,607.54 397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 18,091,992.05 2,208,884.56 3,422,127.48 43,905,904.54 7,735,703.00 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 12,878,988.97 575,016.53 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 765,594.97 83,872.80 349,178.27 10,599,238.58 2,279,750.39 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 15,356,965.72 15,356,965.72 TOTAL 143,487,112.37 5,852,669.42 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 37,890,054.45 4,113,266.62 5,418,481.43 107,805,961.54 35,681,150.84 1N3 Nl:lnOrmt 'IIIX LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 2004 - - - Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date - Operating 08-27-04 TFN Bank of America 1.300% Repo _ ~ 8,65~ 0_90.00 Operating 08-30-04 09-15-04 Bank of America 1.380% Treasury Bills 6,400,072.21 Operating 08-02-04 09-01-04 Twin City Bank 2.110% CD 4,632,323.25 Total 19,687,395.46 Food Service 08-16-04 TFN Bank of America 1.290% Repo 1,140,000.00 1,140,000.00 - Activity Fund 08-27-04 TFN Bank of America 1.210% Repo 825,000.00 - Total 825,000.00 Bond Account 03-08-04 09-06-04 Regions 1.050% CD - - 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11 ,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasurv Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 03-15-04 09-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 10,293,800.80 Capital Projects Fund 08-23-04 TFN Bank of America 1.270% Repo 3,365,000.00 Total 45,621,635.73 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 - Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1044","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1044"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["85 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda RECEIVED AUG 2 b 2004 OFFlr.EOF DESEGREG Tl fl ITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting AUGUST2004 ,... C')\"tl \u0026gt;\no ,-m,- .r.-.\n-r::: Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m-n\no C: -z\no C') o-\u0026lt; r-0 r-z C') U\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F r\u0026gt; C') =\u0026lt; !='N ,- zm\no u, n\no -\u0026lt;m \u0026gt;~ ~ u, I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING August 26, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. President's Welcome to Guests 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners In Education - New Partnerships C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Title IX Update V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes n-.i \u0026gt;,,.. ....\".,m._.'. --,!IC Oz o\u0026gt; \"c'-\"\u0026lt;' m..,\n:,:,c -z\n:,:,n o-\u0026lt; rr--0z n\u0026lt;n \u0026gt; F !:D ~ z m \"(J') ::,:: 'o (J) Regular Board Meeting August26,2004 Page2 VI. HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes 8. Back to the Classroom Program VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION: A. Grant Application: Safe \u0026amp; Drug Free Schools \u0026amp; Communities Act VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property 8. Approval of 2004-05 Operating Budget C. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. EMPLOYEE HEARING XI. ADJOURNMENT (\").., ,.,\u0026gt;. .... ..,.\n.m_.c.. ... == Oz o\u0026gt;\nc\nc c-\u0026lt; m..,\nc C -z\nc (\") o-\u0026lt; F\n(\")C/\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F .., ~ (\") 2m:me ,....c (\")~ o,.... ~f\n::1 m ill .?.,'\nz m\nc C/) :,: '5 C/) l. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MA TIERS/ WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERSHIPS C. CITIZENS REMARKS D. LRCTA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 August 26, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education ~ Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent Partners in Education Program: New partnership The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following school and business have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnership: Fair Park Elementary School and Second Presbyterian Church fl a, c:: g !:!l c:: -0 ~ m C a,(\") Oo Zz Cu,\n-c0 .. . o\nc c....m m\n3 n\nc cri-\u0026lt; Suggested Partnership Activities Second Presbyterian Church Will:  Provide volunteers during the reading block  Sponsor a reading festival centered around a noted author  Sponsor field trips connected to reading  Provide prizes for reading achievement  Help recruit Fair Park parents to help with reading  Help with evening reading activities for parents  Provide resource persons to develop programs for parent development  Develop the parent center in a way that will support parents  Support a technology night to develop parents' computer skills  Help with the quiz bowl and 5th grade challenge  Provide incentives for teachers Fair Park Elementary Will:  Designate a contact person for the partnership  Maintain good communication throughout the partnership  Give guidance to the volunteers  Provide feedback to all individuals involved in partnership activities  Provide encouragement to partnership participants TO: FROM: '.54.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" August 26, 2004 Board of Directors Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services~ Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools PREPARED BY: ---'JG Bill Goodman, District Engineer\n:J - SUBJECT: August 2004 Construction Report A fire destroyed most of the Wakefield Elementary School on June 28, 2002. By the first day of school on August 19, 2004, the replacement building had been completed to the point of being occupied by students and staff. The contractor still has some minor work to do that will last through the month of September. The status of other schools that are undergoing major additions and/or renovations includes:  McClellan classroom addition - The project is complete, except minor cleanup, and is being occupied.  Brady addition/renovation - Complete, but the contractor still has minor work to do.  Dunbar media addition/renovation - Complete except for the dressing rooms for the gymnasium and the conversion of the old media center into classrooms. Shelving for the new media center will be delivered in October.  Central renovation - Completion scheduled for the fall of 2005. The work in the gymnasium has been completed except for the dressing rooms.  Pulaski Heights renovation and new media center - Complete except for the shelving in the media center, which will be delivered in October, and the parking lot scheduled for completion in late August.  Mitchell - Staff and governmental agencies are reviewing the final drawings. Please call me at 44 7-1146 if you have any questions. 8 10 \\\\:\n,. larkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 7'.?.201  \\n,-v.. lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-44 -1001 :n ..... m (\") :c C: \"O ~ m ~ ..... :::\ni:\n:\n\u0026gt;\u0026lt; C: \"O 0 ~ m :c:\n,\n,  0  C: !I:~ ~ifi iri f: en .-.-..t. m\n,\n, en r\"' .z.... m\n,\n, z ,\u0026gt;.... \u0026gt; C: 0 :::\n0\n,\n, Facility Name Booker -- Brady Central Central Central Dodd Dunbar Henderson Mablevale Elem Mitchell Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem - ~ Hgts. MS Southwest Wakefield --- ~ington Western Hills CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD AUGUST 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Project Description I Cost I t:st. L\nompIet1on Date Gym Roof $48,525 Sep-04 -- Addition/renovation $973,621 I Sep-04 - Renovation - Interior $10,200,~ Aug-05 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Dec-04 Reflecting Pond $50,000 Sep-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $9,200 Sep-04 - Renovation/addition $6,149,023 Sep-04 Lockers $80,876 I Oct-04 - Fire Alarm Upgrade-- $12,000 Sep-04 _J3uilding Remediation - - $165,000 I Jul-04 Addition I $2,121 ,226 I Sep-04 -- Renovation I $1,193,259 Sep-04 -- ----- Renovation I $3,755,041 Sep-04 Addition I $2,000,000 Sep-04 --- Rebuild I $5,300,000 I Sep-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade I $11,600 Sep-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Sep-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SUMMER/ FALL 2004 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t:st. L\nompIet1on Date Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Aug-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I c:st. L\nOmpIet1on Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Carver Media Center Expansion ~ $167,490 Unknown Electrical Upgrade --- Unknown' -- Chicot Unknown -- -- Cloverdale Elementary Addition -- $520,750 Aug-05 Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown -- Remodel -- $1,547,ooo - ~st Heights Unknown + Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Gibbs --- - - - Ad-diti-on - $705,670-r Unknown -- --- Meadowcliff Remodel $164,150 Unknown -- Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows $215,000 Unknown ~iHgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation .,. -- $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field - Renovate Track .. $200,000 Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC - $640,000 Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown +- Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation ~ May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting - $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm - $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation - $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system - Mar-02 Bale Partial roof replacement - $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 Auo-01 Facility Name Baseline Booker Booker Booker Booker Booker Brady Brady Carver Carver Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigle~ Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central C-hi-cot- Chicot Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd -- -Do-dd - -- Fa-cilit-ies Servi-ce - Facility Services F-air- Park - Fair Park --- F-air -Park -- J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD AUGUST 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Renovation $953,520 Aug-04 !ADA Rest rooms I $25,000 I Aug-04 Energy efficient light\n-\n,g- I $170,295 Apr-01 I Energy monitoring system installation I $23,710 Oct-01 Asbestos abatement I $10,900 I Feb-02 I Fire alarm I $34,501 I Mar-02 Energy efficient lighting I $80,593 I Sep-02 1Asbestos abatement\n$345,072 I Aug-02 Energy monitoring system installation I $14,480 I May-01 1 Parking lot i $111,742 Aug-03 Student parking I $174,000 ' Aug~ Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair I $265,ooo I Aug-03 Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Aug-03 Irrigation System $14,500 Aug-03 Purchase land for school I Unknown1 Dec-02 Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations I $2,000,000 Dec-02 Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Oct-01 Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 I Aug-01 Front landing tile repair $22,470 t Aug-01 Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Sound Attenuation $43,134 Jul-04 Energy efficient lighting $132,61a I Jul-01 --Energy efficient lighting I - $189,743 Jul-01 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1,393,822 Nov-02 Energy efficient lighting $90,665 Aug-01 - Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Jul-01 Replace roof top HVAC - - $215,570 Aug-02 Interior renovati~ $84,672 Mar-01 ----i=fre ala~ _,_ -- -- $12,000 Aug-03 HVAC renovation/fire alarm - $315,956 Apr-02 Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Aug-01 --r-\n- -- --- Asbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 Aug-01 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music --- room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 Energy efficient lighting $211.s94 I Apr-01 Press box $10,784 . Nov-00 -- --- ---Security cameras -- J-. A.- Fair - $12,500 Jun-01 A thletic Field Improvement $38,000 - J. A. Fair - Jul-03 Irrigation System ~ J. A. Fair - - $14,000-- Jul-03 ~ Roof repairs --- J. A. Fair $391 ,871 Aug-03 Forest Park - Replace window units w/central HVAC - -- $485,258 Nov-03 -- - ~ gonal parking -- Forest Park $111 ,742 Aug-03 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting $119,788 - May-01 - - Fulbright -Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Jun-01 Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units ~ $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs - $200,000 Oct-02 ~ Franklin Renovation - $2,511 ,736 - - Mar-03 Geyer Springs Roof Repair $161 ,752 Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting ~ $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Enerqy monitorino svstem installation $11 ,770  Jul-01 2 '.Tl -\u0026lt; ~ :c C \"ti 0 ~ m !\"\" .z... m \"z ' ,\u0026gt;- \u0026gt; C 0 :::\n0 \"' CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD AUGUST 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. completion Date Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 I Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 - - Hall - Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 Hall -- Infrastructure improvements $93,657 Aug-01 Hall - Intercom Feb-01 Hall - Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 Henderson Energy efficient lighting_ $193,679 I Jul-01 Henderson Roof replacement gym $107,835 May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000_L_ Aug-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Aug-02 IRC I Energy efficient lighting_ _\n$109,136 1 Jul-02 Jefferson I Asbestos abatement $43,639 -Oct--01 Jefferson -- ~Ren-ova-tion \u0026amp; fir-e al-arm $1,630,000 I Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot $269.~ Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. ---Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. - Replace HVAC units $300,000 ~ ug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug~02 Mabelvale Elem. - Energy efficient lighting - -- $106,598 - Dec-02 -Ma-be-lvale MS - Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-Q_!_ -- - M-ab-el-vale MS Renovation $6,851 ,621 Mar-04 _ Partial Replacement -- -Man-n --- - -=--$11,500,000 -- Apr-04 Mann _ Asphalt walks The total $1.8 million ..-- __D ec-.Q! t-- -~- -- Mann _Walkway canopies - -- - is what has been  _ Dec-01 M-an-n - -- - ~Boiler replacement __ used so far on the - Oct-01 Mann _ Jencing projects listed f- Sep-01 tvlann - .artial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. - Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System -- $14,7~ Jul-03 McClellan --- -- - Security cameras $36,300 Jun-01 -- M- cClellan Energy efficient lighting - $303,614 - May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 -- Aug-01 McClellan -Intercom -- $46,000 Feb-02 -Mc-Clellan Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade - -- ---- McDermott $7,700 ---Sep-04 __i:nergy efficient lighting -- $79,411 ~ McDermott - - .. -- Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm - - $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement ~ $253,412 - -- Aug-02 Meadowcliff Engergy efficient lighting -- --- - - $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower - $37,203 - Dec-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system - $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation - $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Asbestos abatement - $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst HVAC renovation - $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation - $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting - $81,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot .. $138,029 Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 - - Otter Creek Parking Improvements $142,541 Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD AUGUST 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement I $273,877 Sep-01 Parkview Exterior lights I $10,784 I Nov-00 Parkview I HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls I $301,938 Aug-01 Parkview Locker replacement : $120,000 I Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement 'Energy monitoring system installation I $5,290 I Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm I $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem I Move playground i $17,000 Dec-02 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting I $84,898 Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting-- I $137,004 I Mar-01 Rockefeller 'Replace roof top HVAC I $539,175 I Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition I $111,742 I Aug-02 Romine !Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $3,534,675 Mar-03 SecurityfTransportation Bus cameras I $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement I $28,138 I Aug-00 Southwest New roof I $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest ,Energy efficient lighting I $168,719 ! Jan-02 Southwest Drainage / street widening I $250,000 Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation I $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment ~ealarm I $9,000 I Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation i $275,000 Dec-01 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,ooo : Jun-04 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data I Nov-02 Terry --Energy efficient lighting ---- -- I $73,850 - Feb-01 Terry __ - Driveway \u0026amp; Parking -- I $83,484 Aug-02 Terry Media Center addition I $704,932 I Sep-02 Wakefield ~curity cameras I $8,000 . Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Feb-01 Demolition/Asbestos Abatement --1- $200,000 -- Wakefield Nov-02 Washington --Security cameras I $7,900 Jun-01 Washington - Energy efficient lighting I $165,281 Apr-01 Watson - Energy monitoring system mstallation I $8,530 Jul-01 Watson - - ---Xsbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 - Watson ~ergy efficient lighting I $106,868 Aug-01 -- - Watson Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Aug-02 -- - Watson -Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,~ Aug-02 ADA Rest rooms Western Hills - --1 -- $25,000 Aug-04 W-e-ste-rn- H-ills --- Asbestos abatement I $191,946 Aug-02 Intercom - Western Hills --- -- -~- $7,100 Dec-01 W-es-tern- H-ills - - - Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Renovation -- $2,106,492 - -- William-s - Mar-04 Parking expansions ~ Williams --- - - - - $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122)19 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion ,- - $1,263,876 Feb-04 Parking Expansion ~ Wilson - - $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Aug-02 4 :,, ..... ~ ::c C,,: ~ m ~ \u0026gt;::c  C: ril~ =-\u0026gt;z ~:\u0026lt;I zm ~~ ,- C: ~ m VJ rn .z.... m :\u0026lt;I z ,\u0026gt;- \u0026gt; C: 0 ::\n0 :\u0026lt;I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: August 26, 2004 To: Board of Directors @ From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - August This is the fifty-eighth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. .=..\". 1ll ::c C: \"C C ?\nm ~ .... ::\n:\nx C: \"C C ?\nm :\u0026lt;\na \u0026gt;O  C: i-ll:z:::! ~i \"' ........ m\na \"' !D (\"') a, s\n:?:\nen:,,\nen ....\noO o .... O::c i!::m - Audit Report - August 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child utrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: August 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Installation of Safari Media Retrieval systems is currently underway at Wakefield, Rockefeller, Watson, and Fair Park.  Computers should arrive next week for new computer labs at Forest Park Elementary and Western Hills Elementary. Computers for a lab at Jefferson will be ordered as soon as the electrical and data work has been completed. The only remaining elementary schools without a lab are Pulaski Heights and Terry Elementary.  The plan for replacing Win95 and Win 98 machines will be finalized by October 1 with orders to begin as soon as possible after that.  The EAST lab at Henderson Middle School has been installed. This lab will be part of a national study to evaluate the effectiveness of the EAST initiative. Cloverdale Middle School will also be a part of the study, but this year will be in the control group. They should come online with an EAST lab next year. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical July 22 - August 26, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. :\u0026lt;\nn  0  C: -:!:z::! ~i en-\u0026lt; -\u0026lt; m\nn en ?' n a, !j\nf\nen\n,\nen -\u0026lt;\nn 0 o-. o:x: !C m '54.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. - Superintendent of Schools Prepared by: Sadie Mitchell~D. Associate Superintendent- School Services Johnny Johnson~JAthletic Director Date: August 26, 2004 Subject: Little Rock School District Title IX Report A copy of the Little Rock School District Title IX report has been prepared for your perusal. The information compiled includes the following: a. A copy of the Title IX Regulations b. A list of sports offered at the middle and high schools c. An outline of the Three-Prong Test developed by the office of Civil Rights (OCR). It defines how a school needs to satisfy one of the three prongs in order to comply with Title IX. d. Improvements for the 2004-2005 school year e. Student Participation Report for each school You may contact Johnny Johnson, Athletic Director or Sadie Mitchell for clarification. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 :c:\no \u0026gt;0c !I:::! ~~ iri~ en-.\u0026lt;.... m\no en ?' (\") a, \u0026gt;~ en:\u0026gt;: en-\u0026lt;\noO o ..... o:r 3:m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TITLE IX REPORT THE TITLE IX REGULATIONS (1975) Virtually all educational institutions receive some form of direct or indirect financial support from the Federal government, therefore nearly every university, high school, middle school and elementary school is required to comply with the requirements of Title IX. The original statute, however, did not specifically refer to athletic programs. Based on the intent of Congress as reflected in the debates in both the House of Representatives and the Senate which preceded enactment of the Title IX statute, it was clear that the athletic programs were covered by the mandate of Title IX. Yet it was not until the now-defunct Department of Health, Education and Welfare issued the Final Title IX Regulations, 34 C.F.R. Part 106, signed into law by President Gerald Ford on July 21, 1975, that the application of Title IX to athletic programs was conclusively addressed. Section 106.41 Athletics: (a) General. o person shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied on the benefits of, be treated differently from another person or otherwise be discriminated against in any interscholastic, intercollegiate, club or intramural athletics offered by a recipient, and no recipient shall provide any such athletics separately on such basis. (b) Separate teams. otwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a recipient may operate or sponsor separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport. However, where a recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited, members of the excluded sex must be allowed to tryout for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport. For the purpose of this part, contact sports include boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact. (c) Equal opportunity. A recipient which operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club or intramural athletics shall provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. In detennining whether equal opportunities are available, the Director of the Office of Civil Rights will consider, among other factors: (I) Whether the selection of sports and levels of competition effectively (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (a) accommodate the interests and abilities of members of both sexes The provision of equipment and supplies Scheduling of games and practice time Travel and per diem allowance Opportunity to receive coaching and academic tutoring Assignment and compensation of coaches and tutors Provision of locker rooms, practice and competitive facilities Provision of medical and training facilities and services Provision of housing and dining facilities and services Publicity Unequal aggregate expenditures for members of each sex or unequal expenditures for male and female teams if a recipient operates or sponsors separate teams will not constitute noncompliance with this section, but the Assistant Secretary (HEW) may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex. Adjustment period. A recipient which operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club or intramural athletics at the elementary school level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from the effective date of this regulation. A recipient who operates or sponsors interscholastic, intercollegiate, club or intramural athletics at the secondary or post-secondary level shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from the effective date of this regulation. In the Little Rock School District, the following sports are offered at the high school level: Men Women Football Volleyball Basketball Basketball Baseball Softball (fast pitch) Track Track Cross Country Cross Country Swimming Swimming Golf Golf Tennis Tennis Soccer Soccer ~ \u0026gt;::c  C: ~~\n\u0026gt;:,z ig\n,, zm zm\"O' r- C:\n,, (\") m \"' !l' (\") 00 \u0026gt;~ en:-\nen-\u0026lt; :,:,0 o-. O::c 3:m The middle schools in the Little Rock School District offer the following sports for students: Boys Girls Football Volleyball Basketball Basketball Track Track *Soccer *Soccer *Soccer is a co-ed sport at the middle school level. The past two years, the Athletic Office has offered a golf clinic at First Tee of Arkansas for our middle schools. The Little Rock School District also provides cheerleading, drill teams, and pep squads for young women to participate, but title IX regulations do not recognize these activities as sports and thus their participants cannot be counted when comparing the number of male athletes to female athletes. The Department of Education was assigned the responsibility of overseeing the enforcement of Title IX through its office of Civil Rights (OCR). The OCR developed a \"3-Prong-Test\" to determine if compliance ofTitle IX is being satisfied. A school needs to satisfy only one of these three prongs in order to comply. 1) A school may provide athletic participation opportunities for female students which are substantially proportional to the female percentage of enrollment at the school. 2) A school may demonstrate a history and continuing practice of expanding its sports offering for women in the very recent past. 3) A school may show that it is fully and effectively accommodating the athletic interests and abilities of the women in its student body. Since the enrollment numbers would not be substantially proportional to female participants, the Little Rock School District Athletic Office has chosen prongs two and three to meet Title IX compliance. As stated earlier, the LRSD offers the same number of sports for both men and women (nine). A major component of Title IX compliance deals with the issue as to whether, in an over-all sense, evaluating a school's athletics program as whole, men and women have comparable access to all \"perks\" of athletic participation. In order to measure compliance, the OCR will examine the following eleven areas, represented by the acronym P-L-A-Y-1- -G F-A-I-R. p L A y I N G F A I R Protective athletic equipment and other athletic supplies Locker rooms and practice and competition facilities Allocation of travel and transportation benefits and per-diem allowances Years of experience, quality, compensation, and assignment of coaches Institutional housing and dining facilities and related services Nature of publicity-marketing-media services for athletic programs Game and practice times and scheduling Facilities for access to athletic training benefits and medical services Academic tutoring services for student-athletes Institutional support services for athletic programs Recruiting resources provided to athletic programs Not all eleven areas will be relevant for all educational institutions. Inapplicable for most high schools will be the assessment of gender equity in recruiting resources, academic tutoring for student athletes, and housing/dining facilities for student athletes. The OCR will review only those program areas of the eleven, which apply to a particular school. These components of P-L-A-Y-I- -G F-A-I-R are some of the main areas that the LRSD Athletic Office works on to insure compliance at all middle school and high schools. 2004-2005 School Year Little Rock Central's gym has been renovated. The locker rooms have been completely redone and look fantastic. Under Title IX compliance, the girls' locker rooms are the same as the boys. The athletes participating in volleyball and basketball will benefit greatly from this project. Enclosed in this report are the student participation reports for the school year 2003-2004. Beginning this year, we will be able to generate this report more accurately due to a new computerized eligibility program that was developed by Larry Pickett, the LRSD web design specialist. In addition to generating the student participation report, all athletic eligibility will be generated on the computer. All head coaches in all sports will be orientated on how to use the program. All football and volleyball coaches have already gone through orientation. The high school and middle school principals and athletic coordinators will also have access to this new eligibility program. The Athletic Office for the LRSD will continue to comply with Title IX regulations. Any Title IX concerns will be addressed promptly and thoroughly. It is the goal of the Athletic Office to offer a safe, enjoyable, and educational experience for~ athletes in the LRSD. ~ (') a, \u0026gt;~ cn='cn ..... :,\n,O o-, O::c: 3:m School: Middle Schools Football Activity Grade Level BM BF Cloverdale FB 6 Cloverdale FB 7 17 Cloverdale FB 8 27 Dunbar FB 6 11 Dunbar FB 7 18 Dunbar FB 8 23 F. Heights FB 6 31 F. Heights FB 7 22 F. Heights FB 8 24 Henderson FB 6 19 Henderson FB 7 20 Henderson FB 8 37 M' vale FB 6 16 M' vale FB 7 20 M' vale FB 8 17 Mann FB 6 13 Mann FB 7 21 Mann FB 8 23 P. Heights FB 6 12 P. Heiqhts FB 7 15 P. Heights FB 8 29 S'west FB 6 10 S'west FB 7 10 S'west FB 8 27 Total 0 462 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 1 14 11 5 1 5 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 6 7 10 6 4 12 6 9 114 1 5 OF No. of Participants 0 18 27 25 29 29 37 27 31 20 22 41 19 26 24 23 27 27 24 21 38 10 10 27 582 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year School: Middle Schools Basketball Activity Grade Level BM BF WM WF HM HF OM Cloverdale BB 6 14 7 Cloverdale BB 7 11 10 Cloverdale BB 8 15 10 Dunbar BB 6 13 11 4 Dunbar BB 7 12 11 1 2 1 Dunbar BB 8 11 8 1 1 F. Heights BB 6 25 19 1 1 F' Heights BB 7 15 6 1 1 F. Heights BB 8 9 7 1 1 Henderson BB 6 16 14 1 Henderson BB 7 15 10 Henderson BB 8 16 4 2 M' vale BB 6 26 15 2 1 M' vale BB 7 12 17 1 M' vale BB 8 9 11 Mann BB 6 22 22 4 1 Mann BB 7 18 14 1 Mann BB 8 11 8 1 P. Heights BB 6 5 10 6 2 P. Heights BB 7 10 12 3 1 P. Heights BB 8 12 4 2 S'west BB 6 20 6 S'west BB 7 16 5 S'west BB 8 1 16 Total 0 334 257 29 12 3 OF No. of Participants 21 21 25 28 27 1 22 1 47 23 1 19 31 25 22 44 1 31 20 1 50 33 20 23 26 18 26 21 17 5 640 :\u0026lt;\n:o \u0026gt;O ' C:\ni:: =! ~~ ierni_~, .... m ~\nSi \u0026gt;::c ' C: ~~\noz ~\n:o zm ~~ ,- C: ~ m en ?' (\") a, r\ni'-'\nen:\u0026gt;: en...,\n:oO 0--t O::c\ni::m School: Middle Schools Volleyball Activity Grade Level BM BF Cloverdale VB 6 5 Cloverdale VB 7 4 Cloverdale VB 8 10 Dunbar VB 6 10 Dunbar VB 7 1 Dunbar VB 8 8 F. Heights VB 6 8 F. Heights VB 7 6 F. Heights VB 8 6 Henderson VB 6 21 Henderson VB 7 15 Henderson VB 8 10 M' vale VB 6 M' vale VB 7 10 M' vale VB 8 5 Mann VB 6 10 Mann VB 7 5 Mann VB 8 2 P. Heights VB 6 8 P. Heights VB 7 4 P. Heights VB 8 4 S'west VB 6 S'west VB 7 S'westVB 8 Total 0 152 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 1 1 4 1 7 1 2 1 2 2 3 8 5 5 43 OF No. of Participants 5 5 10 11 1 6 1 9 1 10 13 7 2 23 17 1 11 11 5 12 7 5 16 9 9 0 0 0 6 201 School: Middle Schools Track Activity Grade Level BM BF Cloverdale TK 6 6 Cloverdale TK 7 12 Cloverdale TK 8 6 Dunbar TK 6 12 16 Dunbar TK 7 2 11 DunbarTK 8 12 11 F. Heights TK 6 16 13 F. Heights TK 7 6 8 F. Heights TK 8 12 14 Henderson TK 6 10 9 Henderson TK 7 8 Henderson TK 8 4 M'vale TK 6 15 10 M'vale TK 7 9 6 M'vale TK 8 15 11 Mann TK 6 15 23 Mann TK 7 6 3 Mann TK 8 2 27 P. Heights TK 6 5 8 P. Heights TK 7 5 6 P. Heights TK 8 2 4 S'west TK 6 S'west TK 7 6 1 S'west TK 8 20 Total 0 170 217 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 2 4 2 3 9 4 1 2 1 28 25 1 3 OF 2 2 No. of Participants 6 12 6 32 14 28 31 15 29 20 8 4 28 16 28 46 11 35 25 16 9 0 7 20 446 !l' nc:c r\n~ \"C'l\")-'i\noO o--, 0 :c 3:m Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year School: Middle Schools Cheerleaders Activity Grade Level BM BF WM WF HM HF OM Cloverdale CL 6 Cloverdale CL 7 2 Cloverdale CL 8 9 Dunbar CL 6 Dunbar CL 7 1 1 Dunbar CL 8 7 3 F. Heights CL 6 F. Heiqhts CL 7 2 2 F. Heights CL 8 4 5 Henderson CL 6 Henderson CL 7 Henderson CL 8 M' vale CL 6 M' vale CL 7 4 M' vale CL 8 5 2 Mann CL 6 Mann CL 7 5 1 Mann CL 8 2 4 P. Heights CL 6 P. Heights CL 7 1 4 P. Heights CL 8 7 S'west CL 6 S'west CL 7 2 S'west CL 8 7 Total 0 51 29 OF No. of Participants 2 9 2 10 0 4 9 4 7 6 6 5 7 2 7 80 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year School: Middle Schools Drill Team Activity Grade Level BM BF WM WF HM HF OM Cloverdale OT 6 Cloverdale OT 7 10 Cloverdale OT 8 5 Dunbar OT 6 Dunbar OT 7 7 1 Dunbar OT 8 11 F. Heights OT 6 F. Heights OT 7 7 F. Heights OT 8 13 Henderson OT 6 Henderson OT 7 Henderson OT 8 M'vale OT 6 M'vale OT 7 12 M'vale OT 8 5 Mann OT 6 Mann OT 7 6 1 Mann OT 8 9 3 p. Heights OT 6 P. Heights OT 7 7 P. Heights OT 8 7 1 S'west OT 6 S'west OT 7 S'west OT 8 Total 0 99 6 OF No. of Participants 10 5 0 8 11 7 13 0 0 0 12 5 7 12 7 8 0 0 0 0 105\ns \u0026gt;:c  C: ~ f\n,:,z is\n,:, zm ~~ ,... C: ~ m CJ) !I' (\") a, r\n~ CJ)\n:,\nCJ\u0026gt;-\u0026lt;\n,:,O 0-\u0026lt; 0 :c 3:m School: Middle Schools Soccer Activity Grade Level BM BF Cloverdale S 6 6 Cloverdale S 7 1 Cloverdale S 8 1 Dunbar S 6 3 4 Dunbar S 7 1 1 Dunbar S 8 1 2 F. Heights S 6 7 4 F. Heights S 7 2 F. Heights S 8 2 Henderson S 6 7 2 Henderson S 7 1 3 Henderson S 8 2 M' vale S 6 7 7 M' vale S 7 4 2 M' vale S 8 7 2 Mann S 6 8 5 Mann S 7 4 Mann S 8 5 P. Heights S 6 4 P. HeiQhts S 7 P. Heights S 8 2 S'west S 6 14 10 S'west S 7 4 1 S'west S 8 14 6 Total 0 106 50 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 6 2 5 12 3 6 5 3 4 7 4 3 2 10 3 1 1 1 7 1 5 4 4 1 1 4 3 5 1 1 10 10 1 2 8 10 3 2 15 6 1 11 1 12 3 112 48 27 6 17 OF No. of Participants 12 3 6 28 1 15 1 18 1 24 5 3 18 14 8 1 22 12 10 1 37 12 20 26 12 17 24 5 20 . 371 School: Middle Schools Pep Club Activity Grade Level BM BF Cloverdale PC 6 Cloverdale PC 7 Cloverdale PC 8 Dunbar PC 6 17 Dunbar PC 7 Dunbar PC 8 F. Heights PC 6 11 F. Heights PC 7 15 F. Heights PC 8 5 Henderson PC 6 Henderson PC 7 6 Henderson PC 8 4 M' vale PC 6 2 M' vale PC 7 M' vale PC 8 Mann PC 6 Mann PC 7 Mann PC 8 p . Heights PC 6 p . Heights PC 7 P. Heights PC 8 S'west PC 6 S'west PC 7 9 S'west PC 8 4 Total 0 73 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 2 6 1 2 1 12 OF No. of Participants 0 19 17 16 7 6 4 3 0 0 9 4 85\n,:,,~ C)\n,. ~o z3: -tz \u0026gt;-c \"e n -c m r-\no nS \u0026gt;n -tm 5cn z :c:\no  O  C: 31:::::! ~~\n::~ en -t -I m\no en ~ \u0026gt;::c  C: ~~ ::Oz !3\no zm ~~ r- C:\no n m en !l' n CD s\n:~ ccnn \"- t\noO 0-t O::c 3: m School: High Schools Football Activity Grade Level BM BF Central FB 9 25 Central FB 10 12 Central FB 11 18 Central FB 12 16 Hall FB 9 18 .___ Hall FB 10 13 - Hall FB 11 11 - Hall FB 12 9 J.A Fair FB 9 3 J.A Fair FB 10 20 J.A Fair FB 11 13 J.A Fair FB 12 19 McCI FB 9 22 McCIFB 10 14 McCI FB 11 22 McCI FB 12 17 P'view FB 9 15 P'view FB 10 12 P'view FB 11 8 P'view FB 12 15 Total 302 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 8 1 5 7 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 5 7 1 1 1 45 OF No. of Participants 34 17 25 19 19 15 12 10 3 22 13 19 22 14 22 18 20 19 9 17 349 School: High Schools Basketball Activity Grade Level BM BF Central BB 9 11 7 Central BB 10 9 10 Central BB 11 11 3 Central BB 12 6 3 Hall BB 9 10 9 Hall BB 10 12 9 Hall BB 11 9 2 Hall BB 12 3 4 J.A Fair BB 9 16 16 J.A Fair BB 10 12 12 J.A Fair BB 11 7 3 J.A Fair BB 12 9 5 McCI BB 9 6 8 McCIBB 10 10 4 McCIBB 11 4 1 McCIBB 12 3 5 P'view BB 9 12 14 P'view BB 10 10 4 P'view BB 11 8 8 P'view BB 12 5 3 Total 173 130 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 5 1 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 14 4 2 OF 1 1 2 No. of Participants 25 23 20 11 19 21 11 8 32 24 10 14 14 14 5 8 26 14 17 9 325 !D (\") a, i\n~ en:,,\nen--\u0026lt;\n,:, 0 o ... O:c 3: m School: High Schools Baseball Activity Grade Level BM BF Central BSB 9 2 Central BSB 10 Central BSB 11 2 Central BSB 12 Hall BSB 9 3 Hall BSB 10 7 Hall BSB 11 8 Hall BSB 12 1 J.A Fair BSB 9 5 J.A Fair BSB 10 4 J.A Fair BSB 11 4 J.A Fair BSB 12 8 McCI BSB 9 1 McCIBSB 10 4 McCI BSB 11 3 McCIBSB 12 2 P'view BSB 9 2 P'view BSB 10 2 P'view BSB 11 2 P'view BSB 12 5 Total 65 0 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 6 10 13 1 2 2 5 1 1 1 6 2 4 52 0 OF No. of Participants 8 10 15 1 3 7 8 1 7 6 4 13 2 5 4 2 8 4 6 5 119 School: High Schools Volleyball Activity Grade Level BM BF Central VB 9 2 Central VB 10 3 Central VB 11 5 Central VB 12 Hall VB 9 3 Hall VB 10 5 Hall VB 11 3 Hall VB 12 3 J.A Fair VB 9 5 J.A Fair VB 10 7 J.A Fair VB 11 4 J.A Fair VB 12 3 McCI VB 9 8 McCIVB 10 4 McCI VB 11 McCI VB 12 5 P'viewVB 9 10 P'viewVB 10 3 P'viewVB 11 5 P'viewVB 12 2 Total 80 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 4 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 OF No. of Participants 6 4 8 4 4 6 3 3 6 8 4 3 8 4 0 5 11 3 6 2 0 98 ~ \u0026gt;::c  c\n:g~\noz ~\no zm ~~ ,- C ~ m Cl) ?3 (\") a, \u0026gt;~ Cl)\n,:: en-\u0026lt;\no 0 0--\u0026lt; O::c lC m Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year School: High Schools Cross Country Activity Grade Level BM BF WM WF HM HF OM Central CC 9 1 1 1 1 Central CC 10 2 1 1 1 Central CC 11 1 2 1 1 Central CC 12 1 3 2 1 Hall CC 9 6 Hall CC 10 6 5 1 Hall CC 11 7 2 Hall CC 12 2 1 J.A Fair CC 9 1 J.A Fair CC 10 1 1 J.A Fair CC 11 2 2 1 1 J.A Fair CC 12 1 2 McCI CC 9 9 10 McCI CC 10 3 McCI CC 11 1 4 McCI CC 12 3 2 P'viewCC 9 1 1 P'view CC 10 P'view CC 11 1 P'view CC 12 2 2 Total 42 41 11 5 1 OF No. of Participants 4 5 5 7 6 12 9 3 1 2 6 3 19 3 5 5 2 0 1 4 0 102 School: High Schools Swimming Activity Grade Level BM BF Central SW 9 Central SW 10 Central SW 11 Central SW 12 Hall SW 9 2 Hall SW 10 Hall SW 11 1 Hall SW 12 1 J.A Fair SW 9 J.A Fair SW 10 J.A Fair SW 11 J.A Fair SW 12 McCI SW 9 McCI SW 10 McCI SW 11 McCI SW 12 P'viewSW 9 1 2 P'viewSW 10 3 4 P'viewSW 11 1 2 P'viewSW 12 1 3 Total 8 13 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 8 5 0 OF No. of Participants 0 0 0 0 6 3 4 1 3 4 7 4 4 35 ~ \u0026gt;::c  C: ~~ :,\n,z ig\n,:, zm ~~ ,.... C: ~ m en ~ c-,CD \u0026gt;~ en\n,:: en--\u0026lt; :,\n,Q 0--1 O::c 3: m School: High Schools Track Activity Grade Level BM Central TK 9 1 Central TK 10 6 Central TK 11 6 Central TK 12 6 Hall TK 9 4 Hall TK 10 5 Hall TK 11 4 Hall TK 12 5 J.A FairTK 9 2 J.A FairTK 10 7 J.A Fair TK 11 6 J.A Fair TK 12 7 McCI TK 9 9 McCI TK 10 9 McCITK 11 14 McCI TK 12 7 P'viewTK 9 7 P'viewTK 10 8 P'viewTK 11 6 P'viewTK 12 12 total 131 BF 9 9 7 7 11 7 6 3 3 3 1 3 1 4 9 11 5 2 4 1 106 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 2 7 2 2 3 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 13 14 0 OF No. of Participants 19 19 18 17 15 12 11 8 6 10 7 11 10 13 23 18 12 11 11 13 0 264 School: High Schools Golf Activity Grade Level BM BF Central G 9 1 Central G 10 Central G 11 Central G 12 Hall G 9 Hall G 10 HallG 11 Hall G 12 J.A Fair G 9 J.A Fair G 10 J.A Fair G 11 1 J.A Fair G 12 McCI G 9 McCI G 10 McCIG 11 McCIG 12 P'view G 9 P'view G 10 P'view G 11 P'viewG 12 Total 1 1 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 1 4 3 4 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 18 9 2 OF No. of Participants 2 4 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 4 1 1 4 2 33 :\u0026lt;\no \u0026gt;O  C: 31: :::! ~ ~ rri~ U\u0026gt;-..-..t. m ~ ~ \u0026gt; :c  C: ~~\no z is\no zm ~~ ,... C: ~ m (/) !I' (\") CD i\n:~ u,:\u0026gt;: u,--t\no 0 0--t 0 :c\nc m School: High Schools Tennis Activity Grade Level BM BF Central T 9 Central T 10 1 Central T 11 Central T 12 Hall T 9 Hall T 10 Hall T 11 Hall T 12 J.A Fair T 9 J.A Fair T 10 J.A Fair T 11 1 J.A Fair T 12 1 McCIT 9 McCIT 10 McCIT 11 McCIT 12 P'view T 9 P'view T 10 P'viewT 11 P'viewT 12 Total 1 2 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 3 5 1 3 3 7 4 2 2 1 2 1 2 19 14 0 3 OF No. of Participants 9 2 9 11 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 41 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year School: High Schools Cheerleaders Activity Grade Level BM BF WM WF HM HF OM Central CL 9 3 5 Central CL 10 2 7 Central CL 11 2 7 Central CL 12 1 5 Hall CL 9 Hall CL 10 Hall CL 11 Hall CL 12 J.A Fair CL 9 3 J.A Fair CL 10 6 1 J.A Fair CL 11 6 5 J.A Fair CL 12 5 McCICL 9 4 McCI CL 10 2 McCI CL 11 1 5 McCI CL 12 10 P'view CL 9 3 1 P'view CL 10 6 2 P'view CL 11 5 2 P'view CL 12 8 Total 1 71 0 35 OF No. of Participants 8 9 1 10 1 7 0 0 0 0 3 7 11 5 4 2 6 10 4 8 1 8 8 110\ni,,~ C) ~ ~c z3: ..... z \u0026gt;  \"-ctim\"' ~~ -\u0026gt;,mn iz5 \"' :\u0026lt; ~ \u0026gt;Oc 3:::! ~~ rri~ en.-...,. m ~ ~ \u0026gt;::c c ril~ ~z ~~ zm ~~ ,-c ~ m \"' ?\" n a, !\nl!\n\"':,\u0026lt;\nu,-, ~o 0-, O::c 3:m School: High Schools Drill Team Activity Grade Level BM BF Central OT 9 10 Central OT 10 6 Central OT 11 12 Central OT 12 5 Hall DT 9 3 Hall DT 10 7 Hall DT 11 7 Hall DT 12 4 J.A Fair OT 9 4 J.A Fair OT 10 10 J.A Fair OT 11 3 J.A Fair OT 12 5 McCIOT 9 McCI OT 10 McCI OT 11 McCIOT 12 P'view OT 9 P'view OT 10 P'view OT 11 7 P'view OT 12 13 Total 96 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 1 3 3 1 8 OF No. of Participants 11 9 15 5 3 7 7 5 4 10 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 13 104 School: High Schools Softball Activity Grade Level BM BF Central SB 9 2 Central SB 10 4 Central SB 11 1 Central SB 12 2 Hall SB 9 Hall SB 10 Hall SB 11 Hall SB 12 J.A Fair SB 9 1 J.A Fair SB 10 3 J.A Fair SB 11 3 J.A Fair SB 12 1 McCI SB 9 McCI SB 10 McCI SB 11 McCI SB 12 P'view SB 9 5 P'viewSB 10 3 P'viewSB 11 3 P'view SB 12 3 Total 31 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 16 OF No. of Participants 4 4 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 3 4 3 47 :\u0026lt;  e:  c:: :ii:::! ~~\n1 ~ en_, ..... m i'll ?' (\")a, ~ ~ en\n,:: en_, :x,O o-, O:r\ni::m School: High Schools Soccer Activity Grade Level BM BF Central S 9 Central S 10 1 1 Central S 11 Central S 12 1 Hall S 9 Hall S 10 1 Hall S 11 1 Hall S 12 2 5 J.A Fair S 9 J.A Fair S 10 J.A Fair S 11 J.A Fair S 12 McCIS 9 McCIS 10 McCIS 11 McCIS 12 P'view S 9 P'view S 10 P'view S 11 3 P'view S 12 Total 8 7 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM 15 1 10 8 1 14 14 1 6 3 2 1 5 1 1 2 2 4 2 2 7 4 1 1 2 3 8 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 47 66 12 0 12 OF No. of Participants 16 21 29 10 1 4 3 11 1 12 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 14 10 2 9 8 160 School: High Schools Pep Club Activity Grade Level BM BF Central PC 9 Central PC 10 Central PC 11 Central PC 12 Hall PC 9 Hall PC 10 Hall PC 11 Hall PC 12 J.A Fair PC 9 J.A Fair PC 10 J.A Fair PC 11 J.A Fair PC 12 McCIPC 9 McCIPC 10 McCIPC 11 McCIPC 12 P'view PC 9 P'view PC 10 P'view PC 11 P'view PC 12 Student Participation Report 2003-2004 School Year WM WF HM HF OM OF No. of Participants :c:: ~  C: 31::::! ~ifi rri\n\"'-I -I m ill ~ \u0026gt;::c  C: ril\n::\u0026gt;:lz ~:x, zm ifi~ ,... C: ill m \"' !ll (\") OJ \u0026gt;~ \"':,,\ncn--c :x,O 0--c O::c\ncm DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August 26, 2004 Board of Education rtve\u0026lt;iy Williams, Directoc, Human Resources Roy G. Brooks, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes l It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE schools are considered intern teachers. .r.\u0026gt;, ,z. nz ,\u0026gt;... :,0 m c3 ~ !D n cc i\n~ u,=\u0026gt;\u0026lt; u,--\u0026lt;\noO 0--\u0026lt; O:t:\ni::m Personnel Changes Page 2 August 26 , 2004 NAME Alanazi, Jessica Reason: None Given Black, Veralee Reason: Leaving City Boyd, Julie Reason: Accepted Another Position Bums, Patricia Reason: Accepted Another Position Cardin, Johna POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Life Science 8-7-04 4-03 CLOVERDALE MID.6-23-04 TCH925 Algebra I 8-7-02 1-02 CENTRAL 5-28-04 TCH925 Elem II 8-7-04 1-03 BRADY 7-20-04 TCH925 Librarian 8-19-81 6-21 CARVER 7-29-04 LIB950 English 8-13-98 4-07 Reason: Returning To School PUL. HGTS. MID. 7-7-04 TCH925 Cazort, Benjamin Spanish I 7-17-03 1-04 Reason: Expired HENDERSO 6-1-04 TCHl0 Clemmons, David Economics 8-7-02 4-08 Reason: Leaving City MCCLELLA TCH925 Cooper, Marquis Elem IV 8-12-99 4-06 Reason: Leaving City FRANKLIN 7-16-04 TCH925 Davis, Christie Kindergarten 8-13-01 1-02 Reason: Leaving City WATSO 7-1-04 K925 ANNUAL SALARY 35730.00 30617.00 31195.00 60020.00 40351.00 29409.00 41507.00 39196.00 30617.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 August 26, 2004 NAME Doss, Jimmy Reason: Accepted Another Position Downie, Katherine Reason: Accepted Another Position Earnheart, Stefanie Reason: Accepted Another Position Ford, Janet Reason: Abandonment Fuqua, Chris Reason: Contract Ended George, Kimberly Reason: one Given Guest, Julia Reason: Health Hi ll, Stephanie Reason: Accepted Another Position Hunjan, Trarndeep Reason : Leaving City Johnson, Doyle Reason: Accepted Another Position POSITION SCHOOL Alt. Skills ALC English FOREST HGTS. Economics DUNBAR Special Ed. CE TRAL Math Il MCCLELLAN English PU!. HGTS. MID. Math HENDERSO 4YROLD CHICOT Special Ed. HALL Counselor PARKVIEW START DATE END DATE 3-31 -03 7-7-04 8-13-01 8-4-04 8-12-99 5-28-04 8-13-01 4-7-04 8-7-03 8-4-04 8-7-02 5-28-04 8-21-73 5-28-04 8-7-03 7-16-04 8-7-02 8-1-04 7-29-03 7-1-04 SALARY CLASS 1-02 TCH925 1-07 TCH925 2-05 TCH925 6-13 SPE925 1-05 TCH925 2-10 TCH925 5-20 TCH925 1-02 4YR925 1-07 SPE925 4-19 C TLJ0 ANNUAL SALARY 27056.00 35816.00 31825.00 45847.00 33506.00 40785.00 52205.00 30617.00 35816.00 54561 .00 ~ \u0026gt; c,:, . C: 8~ zm -\u0026lt;\" e'n ozm\"' en~ mc'i en !J:l c,:, C: C C) .m.. .r.\u0026gt;, z )\u0026gt; z n ~\n., m \"ll 0 .\n..., !J:l nc,:, r\n~ er,:\u0026gt;:: en-\u0026lt;\n.,O o ... O:c\nr:: m Personnel Changes Page 4 August 26, 2004 NAME Kelley, Laurie Reason: Accepted Another Position Lancaster, Tami Reason: Not Return Lollies, Princess Reason: Cert. Expired Lovelady, Kelley Reason: Accepted Another Position May, Harold Reason: Returning to School McGill, Tamika Reason: Personal Mills, Lori Reason: Personal Moorehead, Colette Reason: Leaving City Mosby, Jonathan Reason: Leaving City Mosby, Shaily Reason: Leaving City Mothershed, Michelle Reason: Leaving City POSITION SCHOOL Social Studies ALC Science HENDERSON Special Ed. STEPHE s General Music TERRY Algebra I CE TRAL Vocational Business PARKVIEW Instr. Music M G\u0026amp;T TEPHE s Physical Ed. START DATE END DATE 8-20-98 8-9-04 8-7-02 6-1 -04 8- 11 -03 8-8-04 8-13-01 8-17-04 8-7-03 7-31-04 8-1-02 8-4-05 12-1-03 6-1-04 8-1 -01 7-28-04 8-1-00 CLOVERDALE MID. 8-4-04 Economics 8-13-97 HALL 5-28-04 English 8-16-02 CLOVERDALE MID. 7-22-04 SALARY CLASS 1-07 TCH925 4-16 TCH925 1-15 SPE925 1-15 TCH925 6-07 TCH925 4-04 TCH950 1-09 TCH925 4-13 G\u0026amp;T925 3-05 TCH925 4-08 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 35816.00 50750.00 45059.00 45059.00 43500.00 36885.00 38127.00 47284.00 36510.00 41507.00 33506.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 August 26 , 2004 NAME Peoples, Linda Reason: Leaving City Roberson, Robert POSITION SCHOOL Special Ed. START DATE END DATE 8-7-03 MABELV ALE MID. 8-2-04 Special Ed. 8-7-02 Reason: Returning To School FOREST HGTS. 5-28-04 Settle, Adam Alt. Skills 1-8-03 Reason: Personal MCCLELLAN 7-30-04 Steward, Tracie American History 8-7-02 Reason: None Given FOREST HGTS. 7-1-04 Stricker, Kristine Elem I 8-18-93 Reason: Leaving City CHICOT 8-10-04 Vinson, Sylverene Elem II 8-24-87 Reason: Retired CHICOT 7-28-04 Word, Jennifer English 8-7-02 Reason: Personal FOREST HGTS. 7-9-04 Whitlow, Alecia Librarian 8-30-95 Reason: Personal STEPHE s 7-7-04 Wicker, Amanda ElemY 8-7-03 Reason: one Given WILLIAMS 7-22-04 Williams, Debbie ElemY 8-12-99 Reason: Personal FOREST PARK 7-26-04 Williams, Mary Anne Elem IV 8-18-99 Reason: Retired Carver 7-1-04 SALARY CLASS 5-08 SPE925 1-04 SPE925 1-04 TCHl0 1-12 TCH925 4-13 TCH925 4-19 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 4-12 LIB950 1-04 TCH925 1-06 TCH925 4-17 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43067.00 32350.00 32350.00 41593.00 47284.00 54561.00 31195.00 46128.00 32350.00 34661.00 51905.00 ~  CD . C: 8~ zm .....\" V', ozm\"' V, ~ c'i m u, !I' CD C: C G) .m.... .f.'l, z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt;,...\no m ~ ~ !I' n CD r\n: ~ ,,,::,:\nV, ..... :oc-o, O::c\ni:: m Personnel Changes Page 6 August 26 , 2004 NAME Willis, Vora Reason: Leaving City Wood,Javana Reason: Position Eliminated Wren, Beth Reason: None Given Wyatt, Janice Reason: Returning to School Adams, Ashley Adams, Katrina Adkins, Karen Andrews, Ashley Arnold, Tyneshia POSITION SCHOOL Elem I STEPHE s Leaming Skills WATSON Deaf Ed BALE Special Ed. SPECIAL ED. START DATE END DATE 8-1-03 7-13-04 8-12-02 5-28-04 8-7-03 8-10-04 8-20-90 9-30-04 ew Certified Employees 4 Yr Old 8-11-04 ROCKEFELLER Elem IV 8-11-04 GIBBS G\u0026amp;T 8-4-04 STEPHE s Kindergarten 8-11-04 BALE Elem IV 8-2-04 CLOVERDALE EL. SALARY CLASS 1-07 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-03 SPE925 68-13 ADCll 1-01 4YROLD 1-01 TCH925 4-19 G\u0026amp;T925 1-01 K925 1-04 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 35816.00 31195.00 31195.00 62772.00 30040.00 30040.00 54561.00 annual 53992.66 prorated 30040.00 32350.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 August 26 , 2004 NAME Atchley, Carrie Barnard, Lavonja Beachboard, Margaret Bedell, Lisette Beverly, Tanesshia Bradley, Dora Bradshaw, Sarah Brown, Verlyn Bullard, Renitia Burdess, Jamie Camarillo, Diana POSITION SCHOOL 4 Yr Old MABELV ALE EL. ElemV WAKEFIELD Special Ed. FULBRIGHT ElemV WILSON 4 Yr Old FRANKLIN Economic MCCLELLAN Kindergarten FULBRIGHT Tutor FAIR.PARK Multi-Medi START DATE END DATE 8-2-04 8-11 -04 8-11 -04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Elem I 8-11-04 WASHINGTON ElemV 8-11 -04 GIBBS SALARY CLASS 1-01 4YROLD 1-04 TCH925 4-17 SPE925 1-05 TCH925 1-01 4YROLD 4-18 TCH925 1-01 K925 1-10 TCH925 6-09 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30040.00 32350.00 51905.00 33506.00 30040.00 53061.00 30040.00 39283.00 45810.00 30040.00 35152.00 ~ \u0026gt;. cCD g\nzm \u0026gt;v, .... V, ov, zm v,~ mc'i V, !JI CD C 0 C, .m... .f,l, z \u0026gt;z (\") r\u0026gt;\n,:, m -0 0 .\n.,.:., !JI (\") CD s\n::l-\nV,\"' V, ....\n,:,O o--, O::r: 3: m Personnel Changes Page 8 August 26 , 2004 NAME Case, Chanetta Cherepski, Donald Childrers, Jessica Church, Kathleen Clark, John Clark, Michael Clark, Rose Cole, atalie Cook, Charlotte Cook, Jamie Cooley, Tiefa POSITION SCHOOL Librarian ROMINE Technology MCCLELLAN Elem Art FRANKLIN Consulting Teacher MITCHELL Math HENDERSO Civics HALL Elem I WESTERN HILLS Kindergarten DODD Elem IV MCDERMOTT Kindergarten WATSO Elem IV FRANKL START DATE END DATE 8-9-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 1-07 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 6-20 LIB950 6-11 TCHlO 1-03 TCH925 4-13 TCH925 4-07 TCH925 1-07 TCHI0 1-16 TCH925 1-03 K925 4-03 TCH925 1-01 K925 2-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 58520.00 51880.45 31195.00 47284.00 40351.00 38614.13 46215.00 31195.00 35354.00 30040.00 31542.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 August 26, 2004 NAME Copes, Stephanie Crow, Meghann Cunningham Joan Dale, Susan Davis, Dorethea Dyer, Julie Eackles, Kenyetta Ellenburg, Adele Easley, ichola Evans, Erika Fikes, Leslie POSITION SCHOOL Kindergarten CHICOT Elem II ROCKEFELLER ElemV WESTERN HILLS Elem IV CHICOT 4 Yr. Old MCDERMOTT Kindergarten WILSO 4 Yr. Old JEFFERSO Special Ed. MCDERMOTT Special Ed. FOREST HGTS. Career Orien. FOREST HGTS. Elem Ill ROMINE START DATE END DATE 8-11 -04 8-11-04 8-11 -04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 6-14 K925 1-01 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 2-03 TCH925 6-11 4YROLD 1-05 K925 1-03 4YROLD 4-07 SPE925 6-04 SPE925 1-03 TCH950 1-08 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 51587.00 30040.00 32350.00 32697.00 48121.00 33506.00 36195.00 40351.00 40034.00 31357.47 36972.00 ~ \u0026gt; a, . C: 8~ zm \u0026gt;CJ) -\u0026lt;en 0~ Z\n:o en\u0026lt; n m CJ) !XI a, C: 0 G) .m... .0., z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; r-\n:o m \"C 0 .\n.:.o. !XI n a, !\nl:\nen=\"- en-\u0026lt;\n:oO o .... O:c\n:m Personnel Changes Page 10 August 26 , 2004 NAME Flanigan, William Fuller, Karonda Gurley, Tara Griffith, Keysha Hall, Barbara Hannah, Melissa Hanson, Faye Harper, Jerome Harris, Tiffany Harrison, A vonlea Hiddleson, teven POSITION SCHOOL Arkansas History HENDERSON Elem III OTTERCREEK 4 Yr Old STEPHE s Elem III FULBRIGHT Elem IV WOODRUFF Special Ed. MABELV ALE EL. Elem III WATSON Civics HALL Elem I CARVER Kindergarten FRANKL Science FAIR START DATE END DATE 7-21-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-2-04 8-12-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCHl0 4-01 TCH925 1-02 4YROLD 4-07 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 62-11 SPE925 4-02 TCH925 4-04 TCHI0 1-01 TCH925 4-01 K925 1-05 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 37276.17 34575.00 30617.00 40351.00 30040.00 49248.00 35152.00 39766.64 30040.00 34575.00 16753.00 Personnel Changes Page 11 August 26, 2004 NAME Holloway, Ramona Holmes, Jane Howse, Marion Hunt, Ladina Henry, Christopher Iocolano, Susan Isgrig, Sarah Johnson,Martha Jones, Gregory Jones, haron Jones, Vance POSITION SCHOOL Math FAJR ElemV WILLIAMS Counselor METRO Elem II WASHINGTON Elem I BALE Special Ed HALL Elem III ROCKEFELLER Kindergarten MABELV ALE EL. ElemV WILSO Special Ed. FOREST HGTS. Elem III MITCHELL START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11 -04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 4-18 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 6-21 TCH950 1-01 TCH925 4-08 TCH925 4-09 SPE925 1-01 TCH925 6-19 TCH925 4-08 TCH925 4-03 PE925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 53061.00 30040.00 60322.60 30040.00 41507.00 42662.00 30040.00 57364.00 41507.00 35730.00 30040.00 ~ )\u0026gt; a, . C: 8~ zm )\u0026gt; u, ... u, c5~ z\nc Ch\u0026lt; n m u, !JI a, C: 0 I,) ~ !..\",' z  z C') ,\u0026gt;-\nc m \"C 0 .\n.c. !JI C') a, r\n~ u,::\"\u0026lt; u, ...\ncO o ... O::c ~m Personnel Changes Page 12 August 26 , 2004 NAME Keck, Sherry Kesler, Martha Lancaster, Rita Landry, Rebecca Loring, Shana Martin, Lori McClellan, Dale McDaniel, Yvonne McKnight, Molly McRae, Jane McSpadden, Elizabeth POSITION SCHOOL Math GEYER SPRINGS Librarian START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-5-04 CLOVERDALE MID. ElemV 8-11 -04 CARVER Physics 8-11-04 CENTRAL English 8-11-04 MABELV ALE MID. Kindergarten 8-2-04 STEPHE S Counselor 8-2-04 STEPHE S Elem Ill 8-2-04 CLOVERDALE EL. 4 Yr Old 8-1-04 TERRY Librarian 8-5-04 FAIR Elem Il 8-11-04 WAKEFIELD SALARY CLASS 4-10 TCH925 1-07 LIB950 1-12 TCH925 1-15 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 1-03 K925 5-20 C L925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 4YROLD 4-19 UB950 1-03 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43818.00 36748.71 41593.00 45059.00 34575.00 31 195.00 57276.00 30040.00 30040.00 55981.86 31195.00 Personnel Changes Page 13 August 26 , 2004 NAME Melson, Nathan Miller, Rachelle Modica, Melinda Moix, Saddi Morley, Barbara Mote, Claudia Muhammad, Khaleelah Nash, Jennifer eumeier, Cynthia ichols, Karisa orton, hauna POSITION SCHOOL Elem PE ROCKEFELLER ElemV GIBBS Elem II MEADOW CLIFF Elem I FRANKLIN Kindergarten FRANKLIN Elem IV WATSON Elem IV STEPHENS Special Ed. WASHINGTO Elem V MCDERMOTT Life Science START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-11 -04 8-11-04 8-11 -04 8-11 -04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 CLOVERDALE MID. East Lab 8-11 -04 FAIR SALARY CLASS 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-12 TCH925 1-01 K925 1-16 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 1-04 SPE925 1-07 TCH925 5-08 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30040.00 30040.00 30040.00 41593.00 30040.00 46215.00 30617.00 32350.00 35816.00 43067.00 30040.00 ~ ,..a, . C: g~ zm )\u0026gt;\"' -\u0026lt;\"' 0~ z\n,:, \u0026lt;n\u0026lt; n m \"' !\" Dl C: 0 C) m -\u0026lt; .0.., z )\u0026gt; nz ,\u0026gt;-\n,:, m \"C 0\n,:, -\u0026lt; ~ .-, Dl \u0026gt;i!:'\nen=-- \"\n',:-,\u0026lt;O 0-4 O::c 3:m Personnel Changes Page 14 August 26 , 2004 NAME Norwood, Monica Oliver, Karen Olson, Christopher Pam1ell, Erin Pierce, Charlene Pride, Cheryl Putman, Jessica Ragan, Alicia Reed, Martha Remley, Sarah Rodriguez, Angela POSITION SCHOOL Elem I RIGHTSELL Elem IV MABELV ALE EL. Business Ed. FAIR Elem IV WAKEFIELD Elem II WATSO Asst. Principal FULBRIGHT 4 Yr. Old OTTERCREEK Elem III WATSO Kindergarten BRADY 4 Yr Old DODD Kindergarten MEADOW CLIFF START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-16-04 8-11-04 8-12-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 5-11 TCH925 4-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH950 1-01 TCH925 1-10 TCH925 64-18 ADCI05 1-04 4YROLD 1-01 TCH925 1-01 K925 1-02 4YROLD 1-10 K925 ANNUAL SALARY 46533.00 35730.00 30822.00 annual 30196.46 prorated 30040.00 39283.00 64668 .00 32350.00 30040.00 30040.00 30617.00 39283.00 Personnel Changes Page 15 August 26 , 2004 NAME Samuels, Lori Scanlon, Leigh Scardino, Anne Scogin, Anna Carol Scott, Glenda Scott, Margaret Sharlow, Alan Shelton, Julie Simpson, Co1mie Sinor, Harley Smith, Arbradella POSITION SCHOOL Elem I MCDERMOTT Elem ID FOREST PARK ElemV TERRY Elem ID FULBRIGHT Elem IV WILSO Social Studies DUNBAR Physics CENTRAL Kindergarten FULBRIGHT Elem II WILLIAMS Elem II BOOKER Consulting Teacher BRADY START DATE END DATE 8- 11 -04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 1-03 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 6-20 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 4-03 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-02 K925 3-06 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 5-13 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 311 95.00 34575.00 58520.00 31 195 .00 46215.00 35730.00 31 195.00 30617.00 37665.00 30040.00 48843.00 .\u0026gt; \u0026lt;= C)\n,. ~o z3: --\u0026lt;z \u0026gt;-,:,\u0026lt;\"n -,,m ~~ \u0026gt;__C.\"m\u0026gt; 0 \u0026lt;n z ~ \u0026gt;. ca , 8~ zm \u0026gt;\u0026lt;n .... \u0026lt;n c5\u0026lt;n zm \u0026lt;n~ n m \u0026lt;n ?' a, C 0 C) .m... .!\",\u0026gt;, z \u0026gt;z c-, \u0026gt; r-\n,:, .m,, 0 .\n.,.:., ?' c-, a, !\nf'\n\u0026lt;n\"' \u0026lt;n ....\n,:,O o .... O::c 3: m Personnel Changes Page 16 August 26 , 2004 NAME Smith, Michelle D. Smith, Michelle L. Smith, Mickie Smith, Renee Smith, Zachary Snider, Adrienne Snipes, Patricia Stanley, Charles Stephenson, Edward Sutton, Wilma Taggart, Keri POSITION SCHOOL 4 Yr Old FULBRIGHT ElemV RIGHTSELL Elem II MABELV ALE EL. ElemV FAIR PARK Elem II MITCHELL Elem III STEPHE s Computer Spec. ROMINE Music ROMINE Social Studies CLOVERDALE MID. Social Studies MA Elem II CHICOT START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 4YROLD 4-07 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-09 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30040.00 40351.00 30040.00 30617.00 31195.00 30617.00 46215.00 30040.00 38127.00 31195.00 30040.00 Personnel Changes Page 17 August 26 , 2004 NAME Talbert, Monica Talley Dunn, Leshunda Tell, Hatem Terry, Benita Thomas, Billy Thomas, Deborah Tidball, Holly Treat, Heather Turner, Lula Wagster, Gregory Wallace, She1Ta POSITION SCHOOL Elem ill CLOVERDALE EL. Elem IV JEFFERSON Business Ed FAIR ElemV GEYER SPRINGS Special Ed FAIR Elem V GEYER SPRINGS Music RIGHTSELL Elem I CHICOT Kindergarten STEPHE S Special Ed PARKVIEW Elem III MABEL VALE EL. START DATE END DATE 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-5-04 8-16-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 8-11-04 8-2-04 SALARY CLASS 6-10 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH950 4-18 TCH925 6-20 SPE925 1-02 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-15 K925 1-08 SPE925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 46966.00 30040.00 30822.29 53061.00 annual 52231.92 prorated 58520.00 30617.00 30040.00 30040.00 49594.00 36972.00 30040.00 ~ .\u0026gt;ac: , g\nzm \u0026gt;en -\u0026lt; en 0~ Z\n,:, en\u0026lt; c'i m en !J:l a:, C 0 C) .m... .r.\u0026gt;, z \u0026gt; z Cl  I\"'\"\n,:, .m., 0 .\n.,.:., !J:l Cl a:, r\nf!\nen\n,:: en ....\n,:,O o .... O:r: !!: m Personnel Changes Page 18 August 26, 2004 NAME Wallace, Yulonda Watson, Charlotte Watson, Jana West, Joel Whitaker, Cindy White, Ethel Willian1s, Kim Williams, Harriett Williamson, Michael Wilson, Brenda Wilson, Cheryl POSITION SCHOOL ElemV FOREST PARK Business Ed. ALC Business Ed. CENTRAL Oral Com CE TRAL Kindergarten CHICOT Special Ed. FOREST HGTS. ElemN WOODRUFF Elem IT WASHINGTO Instr. Aide CE TRAL pecial Ed. CE TRAL Elem II MABEL VALE EL. START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS 8- 11 -04 1-12 TCH925 8-11-04 6-03 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 K925 8-11-04 4-06 SPE925 8-2-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-03 TCH925 8-11-04 1-03 TCH925 8-11-04 4-01 PE925 8-2-04 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 41593.00 38878.00 30040.00 30040.00 30040.00 39196.00 30040.00 31195.00 31195.00 34575.00 30040.00 NAME Bush, Yolanda Johnson, Marcus Little, Darlene Roberts, Olivine POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE ADDENDUM New Certified Emplovees Algebra II 8-11-04 HALL Band 8-11-04 MANN Special Ed. 8-11-04 MCCLELLAN Assoc. Supt. 9-13-04 CURR/LEARNING SALARY CLASS 1-12 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-18 SPE925 81-18 ADC12 ANNUAL SALARY 41593.00 30040.00 53061.00 107424.00 ~ \u0026gt; a, . C: 8~ zm \u0026gt;CJ) _,CJJ 0~ z\n:c CJJ\u0026lt; c'i m CJ) !D a, C: 0 C) .m.. !D n a, !\n:~ CJ)\n,: CJJ-\u0026lt;\n:cO o-, 0 :c 3:m Personnel Changes Page 19 August 26 , 2004 NAME Witt, Karen Wright, Brandi Wood, Barbara POSITION SCHOOL Special Ed. FRANKLIN Special Ed. BRADY Special Ed. BALE START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 Certified Promotion SALARY CLASS 3-17 SPE925 4-01 SPE925 2-13 SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 50374.00 34575.00 44251.00 Brooks, Jill Promotion from Title I Coordinator to Assistant Principal at Otter Creek Kovach, Lillian Promotion from 9.25 month to 10 month position at IRC Mehlburger, Becky Promotion from Assistant Principal to Interim Principal at Terry Register, Sandra Promotion from Kindergarten Teacher to Interim Assistant Principal at Rockefeller Bone, Toni Promotion from 9.25 month to 11 month position at Special Ed. Supervisor Bailey, Devon Rea on: one Given Booth, Carlette Reason: Leaving ity Resignations/Terminations on-Certified Emplovees Instr. Aide CHICOT Instr. Aide PUL. HGTS. MID. 9-5-96 8-10-04 9-19-91 8-17-04 33-16 INA925 33-17 A925 16109.00 16595.00 Personnel Changes Page 20 August 26 , 2004 NAME Burt, Geraldine Reason: Retired Butler, Barbara POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition FAIR Instr. Aide Reason: Returning To School ROCKEFELLER Brown, Betty Maintenance Reason: Health PUL. HGTS. MID. Brown, Cynthia Instr. Aide Reason: Accepted Another TERRY Position Butm, Lillian Instr. Aide Reason: Retired FOREST PARK Cole, Carolyn Child utrition Reason: Retired FAIR.PARK Curtis, Cindy Instr. Aide Reason: one Given OTTERCREEK Daniel, ita Child utrition Reason: Health FOREST HGTS. Dwyer, Mike Social Worker Reason: Contract Ended PUPILSERV. Eller, David Tech Specialist Reason: Accepted Another CE TRAL Position START DATE END DATE 8-13-86 7-22-04 8-8-96 8-10-04 1-16-02 7-26-04 10-2-97 8-10-04 11-11-91 8-16-04 8-30-76 7-1-04 8-14-96 7-19-04 8-29-03 8-12-04 10-2-01 6-8-04 7-8-03 9-15-04 SALARY CLASS 7-17 FSH650 33-17 INA925 31-06 CUS928 33-17 INA925 1-10 INA185 1-16 FSMEAL 33-16 INA925 3-02 FSH550 37-20 ANI0 47-10 I 1 ANNUAL SALARY 10646.00 16595.00 13204.00 16595.00 14472.00 12312.00 16109.00 9401.00 30660.00 30660.00 \u0026gt;. \u0026lt;= C) ~ ~c, z_ _,3z::: )..\u0026gt;,,r' n ..,,m ~ ~ -\u0026gt;-,nm o rn z ~ .\u0026gt; cID g~ zm \u0026gt;rn -\u0026lt; rn 0~ Z\nc rn \u0026lt; c'i rmn ~ ID C C C) m -\u0026lt; r.,\u0026gt;., z \u0026gt;z n ,\u0026gt;....\nc m \"C 0\n..c.. ~ nlD r\nr-\nrn\n,s rn-\u0026lt;\nc 0 0--, O::c\ni:m .....-,------------------ Personnel Changes Page 21 August 26, 2004 NAME Forte, Reginald Reason: None Given Garcia, Martha Reason: Health Green, Angela Reason: None Given Harris, icholas Reason: Leaving City Hochestetler, Kimberly Reason: Leaving City Holder, Alice Reason: one Given Hughes, Sandra POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide GIBBS Custodian CHICOT Nurse START DATE END DATE 8-23-00 5-27-04 10-29-03 7-16-04 8-7-03 MABELV ALE MID. 8-23-04 Maintenance 12-2-02 FACILITY SERV. 7-26-04 PBX 8-30-99 COMMUNICATION 7-2-04 Instr. Aide 9-13-95 CHICOT 8-5-04 Hippy Aide 11-3-97 Reason: Returning To School HIPPY 8-5-04 Humphrey, Dorothy BUSMO 11-24-97 Reason: Retired TRANS. 5-28-04 Humphrey, Ketra Care 9-2-03 Reason: Terminated CARE 7-23-04 Hurd, Khristi Instr. Aide 8-19-96 Reason: Returning To chool ROMINE 7-26-04 Hyder, Kcyonna Custodian 2-24-04 Reason: Returning to School FOREST PARK 8-2-04 SALARY CLASS 33-15 INA925 1-01 CUS928 52-13 NURSES 40-05 MAINT. 43-13 AN12 33-17 INA925 33-08 HIPY09 1-08 BUSMO 3-06 CARE 33-16 A925 31-03 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 15637.00 10626.00 38928.00 21432.00 29760.00 16595.00 13015.00 12841.00 7.76 per hour 16109.00 12085.00 Personnel Changes Page 22 August 26 , 2004 NAME Iglesias, Zoraida Reason: Accepted Another Position Jackson, Pamela Reason: Accepted Another Position Johnson, ancy Reason: Retired Jones, Jessinca Reason: Accepted Another Position Jones, Mary Reason: one Given Jordan, Marcus Reason: one Given Lenzie, Diann Reason: Returning to School Lightner, Melanie Reason: Returning to School Ma11inez, Deborah Reason: one Given Moore, Antonio POSI TION SCHOOL Instr. Aide WASHINGTON Nurse GIBBS Secretary PARK.VIEW Child utrition PUL. HGTS. MID. Instr. Aide FOREST HGTS. Security Officer MA.BELY ALE EL. Instr. Aide FOREST HGTS. Clerical STEPHE s Instr. Aide BRADY Security Officer Reason: Returning to chool MCCLELL START DATE END DATE 4-20-04 8-10-04 9-6-91 8-2-04 8-10-92 8-1-04 4-9-02 8-5-04 11-21-03 8-10-04 12-7-98 7-1-04 3-8-04 8-11-04 7-17-01 7-30-04 8-23-02 8-2-04 8-11-03 5-27-04 SALARY CLASS 22-17 INA925 52-19 NURSES 38-20 CLKl0 3-03 FSH550 33-17 INA925 36-20 SOFR9 33-14 INA925 38-11 CLKl0 1-02 INA925 36-10 SOFR9 ANNUAL SALARY 16595.00 46572.00 31596.00 8445.00 16595.00 20835.00 15179.00 24144.00 11425.00 15463.00 ~ \u0026gt;o:, . C: 8~ zm -\u0026gt;c\"\"'' 0~ Z\n,c CJ\u0026gt;\u0026lt; c'i m \"' !:D 0:, C: c0: , .m.... f.\u0026gt;,, z \u0026gt;z (\") ,\u0026gt;....\n,c m ~ 0\n,c ..... !:D (\")o:, i\n:~ \"':,:: c,,-C\nco 0-c O::c 3:m Personnel Changes Page 23 August 26 , 2004 NAME Moore, Barbara Reason: Retired Moore, Patsy Reason: Accepted Another Position Moreland, Mary Reason: Accepted Another Position Pen-y,Jimmy Reason: Personal Robertson, Andrew Reason: Personal Scott, Patricia Reason: Accepted Another Position Shirley, James Reason: Health Sliter, Carolyn Reason: Personal mith, Tunza POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide WOODRUFF Instr. Aide JEFFERSON Child Nutrition SOUTHWEST Custodian ROMINE Security Officer HALL Child utrition FOREST PARK Maintenance FAC. SERV. Instr. Aide BALE Instr. Aide Reason: Returning To School GIBBS tewart, Jacqueline Instr. Aide Reason: Position Eliminated BASELI E START DATE END DATE 9-10-79 8-2-04 9-17-90 8-10-04 8-12-03 8-11-04 1-1-84 8-6-04 9-4-90 8-2-04 12-6-99 7-30-04 3-26-0 I 7-21-04 9-25-00 8-9-04 I 0-13-03 5-28-04 10-14-03 SALARY CLASS 33-17 INA925 33-13 INAl85 3-02 FSH550 35-17 CUS12 30-17 A 10 2-06 FSMGRS 51-03 MA T. 22-14 lNA925 33-11 I A925 33-14 6-1-04 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 16595.00 14735.00 9401.00 26412.00 22752.00 14837.00 28032.00 15179.00 13875.00 15179.00 Personnel Changes Page 24 August 26 , 2004 NAME Strong, Catherine Reason: None Given Tinkle, Betty Reason: Retired Trussell, Kimo Reason: None Given Williams, Andrea Reason: Position Eliminated Williams, Yalanda Reason: None Given Bledsoe, Monique Bonds, Roselyn Buford, Kamirah Caldwell, Cathe1ine POSITION SCHOOL Clerical BOOKER Secretary CENTRAL Instr. Aide CHICOT Instr. Aide MEADOWCLIFF Instr. Aide CHICOT START DATE END DATE 12-8-99 8-2-04 8-10-92 7-5-04 1-27-04 8-6-04 1-2-02 6-30-04 1-12-04 8-9-04 SALARY CLASS 38-7 CLKl0 39-20 CLK10 33-17 INA925 1-08 INSTRC 33-17 INA925 New on-Certified Employees Bus Driver 8-17-04 3-03 TRANS. BUSDRV Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-18 WASHINGTO INA925 Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 JEFFERSON INA925 Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 FOREST PARK INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 21432.00 32544.00 16595.00 19520.00 16595.00 12108.00 17094.00 14735.00 14735.00 ~ \u0026gt;a, . C: 8~ zm -\u0026gt;-\u0026lt;\"\"'' 0~ Z\n,c \"'\u0026lt;n m \"' !ll a, C: C C\u0026gt; !!l f..\u0026gt;, z \u0026gt; z (\") r\u0026gt;-\n,c .m., 0 .\n.,.c. !ll (\") a, \u0026gt;f'\n\"tn'-\"-\u0026lt;' ::oo o .... O:i:: 3:m Personnel Changes Page 25 August 26 , 2004 NAME Chandler, Hilton Crawford, John Crutchfield, Tova Daniels, Devera Dotson, Shirley Golston, Shawn Haggans, Monica Hawkins. Dawna Hicks. Felicia POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide CHICOT Maintanence PLANTSERV. Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Instr. Aide ROMINE Instr. Aide BRADY Security Officer START DATE END DATE 8-16-04 7-28-04 7-15-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-16-04 MABELV ALE MID. Care 8-9-04 CARE Instr. Aide 8-11-04 OTTERCREEK Instr. Aide 8-11-04 FORE TPARK SALARY CLASS 33-11 INA925 49-07 MAINT. 33-13 INA12 33-13 INA925 33-05 INA925 36-17 SOFR9 1-02 CARE 33-15 I 'A925 33-0 A925 ANNUAL SALARY 13875.00 annual 13650.00 prorated 29760.00 annual 27353.87 prorated 18718.00 annual 1792 1.49 prorated 14735.00 11600.00 19044.00 7.13 per hour 15637.00 12628.00 Personnel Changes Page 26 August 26 , 2004 NAME Hill, Richard Hubbard, Myia Isbell, Brenda Jefferson, Tammie Jones, Kiril Jordan, Shatonja Justice, Valerie Leaks, Mary Long, Calvin Payne, Celeste Robinson, Monique POSITION SCHOOL Custodian HENDERSON Care CARE Instr. Aide WAKEFIELD Instr. Aide WASHINGTO Instr. Aide MABELV ALE EL. Secretary FORESTHGTS PBX COMM Instr. Aide OTTERCREEK Custodian A X Instr. Aide FOREST PARK Bus Driver TRANS START DATE END DATE 6-22-04 8-9-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 8-9-04 7-28-04 7-21 -04 8-11-04 6-21-04 8-11-04 8-17-04 SALARY CLASS 3-05 CUS12 1-02 CARE 33-13 INA925 33-09 INA925 33-13 INA925 39-06 CLKlO 43-12 AN12 33-13 INA925 31-01 CUS12 33-05 INA925 3-02 BUSDRV ANNUAL SALARY 21432.00 7.13 per hour 14735.00 13070.00 14735.00 21432.00 27286.16 14735.00 7266.00 11600.00 l-1450.00 ~  ID . C: 8~ zm \u0026gt;__e.crn, 0~ Z\n,, CJ)\u0026lt; c=\nm CJ) !I\" ID C: 0 G) .m... .f.l, z \u0026gt; z (\") ,\u0026gt;...\nJl m \"ti 0 .\n.J..l ?' (\") CD \u0026gt;~ v,='- \u0026lt;J\u0026gt;--\u0026lt;\n,,O o .... O::c 3:m Personnel Changes Page 27 August 26 , 2004 NAME Roberson, Shannon Rucker, Elnora Saine, Kenoris Smith, Jason Spring, Michael St. Clair, Tracy Trammell, Rickey Turner, Reva Walker, Whitney Webster, Joyce POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide JEFFERSON Custodian SOUTHWEST Instr. Aide CHICOT Instr. Aide OTTERCREEK Custodian STEPHE S Instr. Aide OTTERCREEK Custodian BRADY Instr. Aide ROMINE Care CARE Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER START DATE END DATE 8-11-04 5-19-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 7-29-04 8-11-04 8-16-04 8-11-04 8-9-04 7-15-04 SALARY CLASS 33-13 INA925 1-01 CUS928 33-17 INA925 33-17 INA925 33-01 CUS12 33-09 INA925 31-03 CUS925 33-09 INA925 4-01 CARE 33-13 Al2 ANNUAL SALARY 14735.00 11379.00 16595.00 16595.00 13078.00 13070.00 6042.50 13070.00 6.25 per hour I 8718.00 annual 17921.49 prorated Personnel Changes Page 28 August 26, 2004 NAME Williams, Monica Wofford, Rhonda Yarbough, Linda Zakaria, Tauhida POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Bus Driver TRANS urse MITCHELL Instr. Aide OTTERCREEK START DATE END DATE 8-16-04 8-17-04 8-11-04 8-11-04 Non-Certified Promotion SALARY CLASS 33-08 INA12 3-02 BUSDRV 52-07 NURSES 33-05 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 16,109.00 annual 14052.53 prorated 11450.00 31357.00 11600.00 Loftis, Regina Promotion from 10 month to 12 month position at Facility Services on-Certified Transfer ONE ~ .c a, g\nzm  u, .... u, i5 gi Z\n:o u, \u0026lt; c'i m u, !%J a, C 0 c\n, !:!l .f,l, z  z (\") \u0026gt;,-\n:o m -0 0 ~ !%J (\") a, r\n~ u,\n,:: en--\u0026lt;\n:oO o .... 0::C 3::m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: August 26, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From: Dr. Roy Brooks Superintendent of Schools Prepared by: Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Back to the Classroom Program Let us not forget where we began - - in the classroom. I have authorized the Human Resources Department to develop the \"Back to the Classroom\" (BTTC) program. District administrators, central office staff, curriculum and instruction staff, and most other departmental staff members will substitute teach for one day in a classroom each semester. This includes both certified and non-certified employees. We've all been there before, we love children (young adults for those secondary folks), and we want to be more visible in our schools. This will give all of us a better understanding of the challenges and opportunities that our classroom teachers face each day. The initial design of the program is as follows:       Every \"BTTC'' participant will substitute for a teacher one day each semester . Human resources will work with principals to prearrange these assignments for known illnesses/ doctors appointments, professional leave, etc. Human Resources will also coordinate a brief training session for staff members who need a refresher course as they travel back in time to their classroom days. All non-certified staff members participating in the \"BTTC\" program will be required to attend this training . Participants will have an opportunity to indicate their preference with regard to elementary, middle or high school levels as well as subject areas. All schools will be served. Schools that are experiencing a more difficult time scheduling substitutes may have more \"BTTC\" participants in their buildings. We will work side by side with teachers thus establishing a closer team/unit and an opportunity to build mutual respect. At approximately $50 per day for a substitute, there will be a saving in the District's substitute budget. (Human Resources and Financial Services will put a pencil to the figures to share with you in the near future.) The details are being developed and they will be shared with you at a later date, but I wanted to share a brief preview of the concept. (Any Board member who wishes to volunteer in the program will be welcomed .) I ask for your approval to continue planning and implementation of the Back to the Classroom Program. !1l t0 C: C G) !!l ?\u0026lt;x m~ 3::,- Co 5!!1 -\u0026lt;Z me, m\n,:, :i:m ~3::\n_,\n:,,\u0026gt;:, z\n:,:: G) CJ) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DATE: August 26, 2004 FROM: Jo Evelyn Elston, Director - Pupil Services Junious Babbs, Assoc. Supt. for Administrative Services THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Grant Application: Safe \u0026amp; Drug Free Schools and Communities Act Summary: The Arkansas Department of Education issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Title IV Community Service Grant Program targeting students who have been long-term suspended or expelled from school. The goal of the grant is to provide suspended and expelled students with meaningful activities during their absence from regular school to help them avoid negative and self-defeating behaviors. The intent of the grant will benefit our students by reducing recidivism and dropout rates of students assigned to Alternative Learning Programs, and will teach students the value of service to others. Goals \u0026amp; Objectives: 1. The 2004-05 suspension/expulsion recidivism rate for long-term suspended and expelled students will decrease by 30% when compared with 2003-04 suspension statistics. 2. The dropout rate for long-term suspended \u0026amp; expelled students will decrease by 40% when compared to 2003-04 statistics. 3. The number of violence-related policy infractions occurring at Alternative Learning sites will decrease by 30% 4. Interpersonal conflicts and violence within the school and community will be reduced by 25%. 5. Students will be provided an opportunity to develop a sense of civic and social responsibility. Maximum Grant Budget: $75,000.00 - no match required. The grant application was submitted by the August 1, 2004 deadline. We request the Board's approval to maintain the grant application submission. ~ )\u0026gt; C \u0026lt;- 0 C: ::c z 3: .zm. . .f..l, z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt; r\nc m ell ~ \u0026gt; \u0026lt;\u0026gt;\u0026lt; m~ 3: r \"O 0 r\"' Qz me, m::c :cm ~ 3:\n_c\n\u0026gt;c Z::\u0026gt;\u0026lt; Cl Cll LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: August 26, 2004 Board of Education FROM: ~al Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: School/Department Chicot Elementary School Little Rock School District $100.00 cash to help defray the cost of a staff celebration in honor of school making A YP for 03-04 school year A cello valued at approximately $500.00 Donor J.A. Riggs Tractor Company Mr. W. Brent Swain It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. ~ \u0026gt; 0 \u0026lt;- 0 c:: ~ 3: m z -I !%' a, c:: 0 c\n, !!l .r.i, z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt;,...\n,J m c3 ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 August 26, 2004 TO: ~ J Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FR~ll'7\":~14-.-Eilanny Fletcher, Director of Fine Arts nnis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Instruction SUBJECT: Donation Mr. W. Brent Swain has generously donated to the Fine Arts Department of the Little Rock School District a cello with an estimated value of $500.00. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. DF/adg RECE VEO AUG 4 2004 TO: Darral Paradis FROM: Jane Harkey, Principal Chicot Elementary School RE: Donation DATE: August 4, 2004 JA Riggs Tractor Company, one of our Partners in Education, of PO Box 1399, LR, Ar, willingly donated $ 100.00 to our school on 8-4-04. This money wiU be used to help defray the cost of a staff celebration luncheon on 8-11-04 in honor of our school making A YP for school year 03-04. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED AUG 4 2004 ~ \u0026gt; C \u0026lt;- 0 C: :x, z 3: zm ..... !X\u0026gt; a:, C: C C) !:!l p..,, z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt;,... :x, m\ng ~ Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 DATE: August 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Roy G. Brooks, ED. D., Superintendent of Schools PREPARED BY:l-1ark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes  Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending July 31, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District NIA  Needed Staff NI A  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the July 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 0731/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 07/31/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 9,574,108 16.64% 61,436,691 10,426,098 16.97% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 308,857 3.06% 12,135,000 427,870 3.53% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 3,923 1.03% 485,000 4,513 0.93% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 19,729 9.86% 245,000 39,877 16.28% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 215,000 TOTAL 98,607,800 9,906,616 10.05% 106,311,691 10,898,358 1025% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 65,082,694 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141,165 REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 8,275,000 VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 1,350,000 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 2,100,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 5,542,510 TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 4,125,000 INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,900,000 4,575,000 ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 934,380 POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 TAP PROGRAM 285,245 382,903 AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 TOTAL 74,776,187 0 0.00% 102,522,882 0 0.00% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 1,295,000 TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 0 0.00% 3,914,008 0 0.00% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 9,912,037 5.60% 212,770,581 10,904,002 5.12% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 19,048 0.08% 21,531,929 1,306,173 6.07% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 8,169 0.20% 4,500,000 9,832 0.22% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 27,964,934 TOTAL 52,765,141 27,217 0.05% 53,996,863 1,316,005 2.44% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 9,939,254 4.32% 266,767,444 12,220,006 4.58% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2003/04 0731/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 07/31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 1,439,812 1.43% 117,324,912 1,590,163 1.36% BENEFITS 26,483,772 692,479 2.61% 36,185,811 757,302 2.09% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 1,454,502 7.38% 20,959,918 1,350,815 6.44% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 366,134 4.47% 8,725,914 856,967 9.82% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 357 0.02% 2,760,600 165,963 6.01% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384 ,567 26,373 0.31% 10,770,418 34,013 0.32% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 12,474,809 TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 3,979,655 2.25% 209,202,382 4,755,223 2.27% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 526,781 2.02% 23,853,134 1,331,300 5.58% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 225,249 5.63% 5,007,809 352,242 7.03% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 113,654 0.46% 27,964,934 799,818 2.86% TOTAL 54,745,544 865,684 1.58% 56,825,877 2,483,360 4.37% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 4,845,339 2.09% 266,028,259 7,238,583 2.72% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1 ,954,984) 5,093,914 739,184 4,981,422 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 2,720,114 1,176,943 2,838,601 OPERATING 9,052,274 14,959,237 10,099,905 12,680,485 TOTAL 10,630,451 17,679,351 11,276,848 15,519,086 I\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1057","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1057"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["80 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda RECEIVED JUL 2. 2004 OFFICE OF DE EGREGATIO l,,ONITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting JULY 2004 :- n-.. .\u0026gt; ::m0 r- rr..-.. 3- : Oz o\u0026gt;\n:o\n:o c-\u0026lt; m..,\n:o C: -z\n:on o-\u0026lt; F~ n\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F ..,\n:o g ~m mC r- C: on,.~... ~~ :l m\n:o (I\u0026gt; !:ti\n:o nm =1:1: ~i Z\u0026lt;J\u0026gt; en..,\n:o 0 :I: I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING July 22, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. President's Welcome to Guests Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Update: Judge Wilson's Ruling and Recommendation for Appeal - Attorney Chris Heller C. Student Assignment Report D. Budget Update E. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects F. Internal Auditors Report G. Technology Update H. School Opening Progress Report V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Action: Eighth Circuit Appeal of Judge Wilson's Ruling of 06-30-04 B. Minutes: Regular Meeting - 06-24-04 C. Personnel Changes o-,:, \u0026gt;\nc ~ ~ ..... 3:: Oz o\u0026gt;\nc\nc c-\u0026lt; m-n\nc c:: -z\nc 0 o--\u0026lt; r-~ r-z 0\"' \u0026gt; F .\n=,, g ~m mC r- c:: 0~ 0 r- ~ ~ ~ m\nc \"' Regular Meeting July 22, 2004 Page2 VI. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Purchase of School Buses B. Memorandum of Understanding: Staffing Issues from June 24, 2004 Board Meeting C. Financial Report VII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Presentation of First Draft Superintendent's Entry Plan: The First 100 Days 2. Dates to Remember 3. Special Functions VIII. ADJOURNMENT o-.. . m:n ,,-- ,_... :C Oz o  :n :n C -\u0026lt; m-.. :n C: -z :n n o-\u0026lt; F\noen ,- ,- .\n.=, :n g ~m mC ,- C: n~ 0,- ~~ =I m :n en ?' :n nm =i 31: ,:::\n~ m\n,: Zen en.., :n 0 31: I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS C. LRCTA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: July 22, 2004 To: From: Re: Board of Education Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools Decision Regarding Judge's Ruling on Compliance Remedy As discussed in the Board's agenda meeting on July 8, 2004, Attorney Chris Heller will be present to review the recent ruling from Judge Wilson and to make recommendations for the Board's consideration. bjg ~ .... mn :c z 0  -\u0026lt; C:\n!I ~ m fl !!l C: C :,:,m mZ ~\n..,..: ,.\",,' C) z ~ m ~ !=' a, C: g !:!l C: ~ m '\n.411 Individual Approach to a W,,.orld of K11011 1/edge\" July 22, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent of Schools PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer fu SUBJECT: July 2004 Construction Report The Architect/Engineer Selection Committee met recently, and architects were chosen for the following projects: Media Center Addition- Carver: Herron \u0026amp; Horton Two (2) Classroom Addition- Fair Park: Woods-Caradine Addition \u0026amp; Remodel- Forest Heights: Borne Firm 5 Classroom Addition-Gibbs: Roark Perkins Perry \u0026amp; Yellvington Remodel-Meadowcliff: Herron \u0026amp; Horton ew Windows-Oakhurst (Adult Education): Herron \u0026amp; Horton The final construction days for this summer are winding down. Several schools have been undergoing major construction projects and are due to be completed before the return of students in August. Baseline Elementary, Wakefield Elementary, McClellan Magnet High, Pulaski Heights Middle and Pulaski Heights Elementary are nearing completion. The architects and contractors for these projects are in the process of doing their final punch lists. Please call me at 44 7-1146 if you have any questions about construction at any of our schools. 810 \\'\\'. t-.larkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  W\\\\'\\.v.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !I' I: z .C..:. emn Facility Name Baseline B-oo-ker- -- Booker - Brady Central Central - Central -- Chicot Chicot Dodd ----- Dunbar J. A. Fair Henderson r-- Mablevale Elem f- - McClellan McDermott -- Mitchell - Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem Pulaski Hgts. M-S-- Southwest Wakefield_ __ - Washington Western Hills Western Hills CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Proiect Description I Cost I t:st. 1,.\nompletion Date Renovation --- $953,520 Aug-04 ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 -- - $48,52_5_ _ G m Roof Sep-04 Addition/renovation $973,62_1_ _ Sep-04 Renovation - Interior $10,200,~ ~ -05 HVAC Renovation - Band Area $225,000 Dec-04 Reflecting Pond $50,000 Sep-04 Drainage $64,700 ~ g-04 Sound Attenuation $43,134 Jul-04 --Fire Alarm Upgrade --- -- $9,200 Aug-04 Renovation/addition $6,149~ __Se p-04 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music_ __ room addition $3,155,640 Jul-04 --Lockers ---- - - $80,~ Aug-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade - - --- $12,000 Aug-04 ~ - Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $7,700 ~ Sep-04 Building Remediation - $165,000 Jul-04 Addition $2,121 ,226 ~ ep-04 Renovation -- $1 ,193,25_9_ _ Aug-04 Renovation $3,755,041 Aug-04 Addition $2,000,000-- ~ g-04 Rebuild $5,300 .~~p-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $11 :600 Sep-04 ADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-Qi Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Sep-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SUMMER/ FALL 2004 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost 1 1::st. c..\nompletIon Date Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Auo-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t:st. 1,.\nompIeuon Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Carver Media Center Expansion I $167,490 Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade I Unknown Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition I $520,750 Aug-05 Fair Park I Addition I $799,ooo I Unknown Forest Heights I Remodel I $1 ,547,000 Unknown Garland ____._ Remodel I Unknown Unknown Gibbs !Addition I $705,670 Unknown Meadowcliff Remodel - I $164,150 Unknown Oakhurst (Adult Education) 1 New Windows I $215,000 Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS  Energy monitoring system installation I Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD JULY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost I 1::st. L\nompIetIon Date Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration -- Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 --- ~ Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation --=- May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr.  Energy efficient lighting _I_ $82,000 ' Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestosabatement --1- $237,2~---Jul=O'f Badgett Fire alarm --- $18,250 Aug-02 Bale , Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system --I Mar-02 Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC ~ -- $664,587 Aug-01 Booker __E.nergy efficient lighting I $170,295 - Apr-01 Booker Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 - -- - Booker Asbestos abatement $10,900 Feb-02 Booker --~ealarm -- $34,501 Mar-02 Brady ~ Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Sep-02 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,072 Aug-02 Carver Energy monitoring ~s~m installation $14,480 Ma_y-_Q_1 Carver , Parking lot $111,742 Aug-03 Central Parking Student parking - $174,000 - Aug-03 Central/Quigley 1Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 --Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement-- $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigle Irrigation System - -~I- $14,500 Aug-03 - Central Purchase land for school Unknown Dec-02 Central ~of \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 I Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair I $24,000 Oct-01 Central I Fire Alarm System Design/Installation I $80,876 Aug-01 Central I Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 -- IE nergy efficient lighting $132,678 Jul-01 Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS I Energy efficient lighting $189,743 I Jul-01 Cloverdale MS M ajor renovation \u0026amp; addition $1,393,822 Nov--02 Dodd Energy efficient lighting $90,665 . Aug-01 Dodd I Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 I Aug~ Facilities Service Interior renovation I $84,672 Mar--01 Facility Services ,Fire alarm $12,000 Aug-03 Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 I Apr-02 Fair Park I Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park , Asbestos abatement-ceiling I $59,310 I Aug:Q!_ J. A. Fair i Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box $10,784  Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras $12,500 I Jun-01 J. A. Fair Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System $14,000 I Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs $391,871 I Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 I Nov-03 Forest Park Diagonal parking $111,742 I Aug-03 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting $119,788 I May-01 Fulbright Energy efficient lighting $134,463  Jun-01 Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation I $11,950 Aug-Ql_ Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 I Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot $140,000 I Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs I $200,000  Oct-02 2 ~ .... ~ ::c z 0 8 -\u0026lt; C: ~ m !D\ni: z .C..:. m CJ\u0026gt; CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JULY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Descriotion I Cost I Est. Completion Date Franklin Renovation $2,511 ,736 Mar-03 Geyer Springs - Roof Repair __$ 161 ,752 ----Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs -- Energy monitoring system installation ... .. $11,770 Jul-01 Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition --- - $8,637,709 ~ 03 Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 Aug-01 --- - - -- - Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 Energy efficient lighting -+ Hall ------- -- $296~ Apr-01 Hall ~ astructure improvements $93,657 _Aug-01 Hall -- - - -- Intercom T Feb-01 - Security cameras - - - $10,600 -- Hall Jun-01 --- - 4 -- -- Henderson _ Energy efficient lighting $193,679 Jul-01 Henderson Roof replacement gym --T $107.~ May-01 Henderson --- -- Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,0~ ~ g-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 --- Henderson -- - $250,000 Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting $109,~ - Jul-02 --- Asbestos abatement -- 4 Jefferson -- - -- $43,6~ Oct-01 T --$1 ,630,000 --- Jefferson ---- Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lo_t _  - $269,588 Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. - Energy monitoring system installation $12:150 Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. - Replace HVAC units -- $300:000 ~ g-02 Asbestos Abatement - - Mabelvale Elem. $107,0~ - Aug-02 Mabe-lva-le E-lem. --Energy efficient lighting-- $106,598 --i5ec-02 Renovate bleachers -- ---T Mabelvale MS $134,793 --Aug-01 Mabelvale MS - -- -- Renovati~ $6,851T21 - Mar-04 --+----- Mann Partial Replacement $11 ,500,000 Apr-04 Mann Asphalt walks -=-h he total $1 .8 mi~ ---Dec-0 0 1 -Ma-nn Walkway canopies -- is what has been Dec- 1 Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 - --- -- Mann __ _fencing projects listed ~ p-01 Mann -- _Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann..:._,_ ~-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement ------ $38,000 Jul-03 $14,7~ - McClellan Irrigation System I Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras I $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan  Energy efficient lighting I $303,~ May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 McClellan Intercom I $46,000 Feb-02 McDermott 1 Energy efficient lighting I $79,411 I Feb-01 McDermott I Replace roof top HVAC units I $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm i $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement I $253,412 Aug-02 Meadowcliff 1 Engergy efficient lighting I $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan I Replace cooling tower I $37,203 I Dec-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system I $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan I Energy monitoring system installation I $17,145 I Aug-01 Mitchell !Energy efficient lighting $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell , Energy monitoring system installation I $16,695 I Jul-01 Mitchell !Asbestos abatement i $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst IHVAC renovation I $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation I $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek I Energy efficient lighting I $81 ,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek ,Asbestos abatement I $10,000 ! Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot I $138,029 I Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition $888,778 I Oci=02 Otter Creek Parking Improvements $142,541 I Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD JULY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Descriotion I Cost I Est. Completion Date Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 -- Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement -~ $273,877 Sep-01 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls -- $301 ,938-- Aug-01 -- - -- Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 I ~ ug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 Jun-02 Procurement ~ alarm-- I - $25,000 I Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting --- $84,898 __Ap r-01 Rockefeller _Jnergyefficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition $111,742 Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 Security!Transportation Bus cameras ---- - I $22,500- Jun-01 Southwest - Asbestos abatement i $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest New roof $690,000 --Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest 1 Drainage I street widening I ~50,000 Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation I $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm I $9,000 Aug-0~ Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Dec-01 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 I ---- Jun-04 Technologi.!Jpg_!ad_e ____ Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data : Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting I - --$73,850 Feb-01 - Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking I - $83,484 Aug-02 Terry Media Center addition I $704,932 Sep~02 Wakefield -- Security cameras I $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting I $74,776 , Feb-01 Wakefield i Demolition/Asbestos Abatement I $200,000 I Nov-02 Washington Security cameras I $7,900 Jun-01 Washington I Energy efficient lighting I $165,281 Apr-01 -Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 Aug-01 Watson I Energy efficient lighting I $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson jAsbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,000 I Aug-02 Western Hills !Asbestos abatement i $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills !Intercom i $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills I Energy efficient lighting I $106,ooo I Jul-01 Williams I Renovation I $2,106,492 . Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions I $183,717 I Dec-03 Williams I Energy efficient lighting $122,719 I Jun-01 Wilson I Renovation/expansion I $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 I Aug-03 Woodruff I Renovation I $246,419 Aua-02 4 :\" z m-\u0026lt; :x,~ m\u0026gt; \"llr- ~~ -\u0026lt; 0 =I 0 :x, CJ) p m-\u0026lt; C') :c z 0  -\u0026lt; C:\ng ~ m \"ll :c :x,' gl!l :x, :c ~8 :x, rm O c3~ :x,z -\u0026lt; z C)\n,,, :\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\na no -\u0026lt; C: i5 =:! .z. zm ?\n~ \"ll::::1 ~m r- :x, CJ) !%' !I:: z C: m-\u0026lt; CJ) Date: June 24, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR.KA SAS To: Board of Directors ~ From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - July This is the fifty-seventh communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. .f,l, m\n,\n, ~ z z m,.... n ::,: ~ C) m V) p ... m n ::,: z 0  -\u0026lt; C: ~ m .,, ::,:\n,\n, . 2!{l\n,\n,::,:\ng\n,\n,,mo c3 ~\n,\n,Z ... z C) -,-,:\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\n,\n, no ..... C: 5::::! z. . zm .~,, i...:.. ~ ..... ,-m\n,\n, V) !l' 3: z .C...:. m V) Audit Report - July 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKA SAS 72201 Date: July 22, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Staff from Instructional Technology and Computer Information Technology have moved to the new Technology Center on the campus of Metropolitan Career and Technical Center.  Technology training for teachers will be held every day the last two weeks in July in the training rooms at the new Technology Center. These classes are funded through the EETT (Enhancing Education Through Technology) grant. All classes are full.  We have received notification from the organization that administers the E-rate program that $1.1 million in program funds have been released to Alltel for our telecommunications costs for 2002-2003. Alltel will then reimburse us this amount. These are funds we applied for in January 2002.  Technicians are spending every day in the schools getting machines ready for the return of teachers and students. All district computers are being checked for the lasted virus protection and system updates. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical June 25, 2004 - July 22, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. f..l, m\n,, V, 0 z z mrn ~ z C) m V, '?\" ...,s c \n,, a, nc ::c VJ \u0026gt;z Vim mv,  V, ~ V, 5 !B 0~ r-m a, VJ C V, m V,\ng~ g~ ~::c V, 0 V, 0\n,, rm O\n-gril\n,,Z -\u0026lt;z C) !D :I: z .C.. . m V, To: From: LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF SCHOOL SERVICES 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITILE ROCK, ARKANSAS Little Rock School District Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D~ Superintendent of Schools Prepared by:'{sadie Mitchell, Ed. D. Associate Superintendent - School Services Subject: Date: School Opening/Closing Committee School Opening Progress Report Thursday, July 22, 2004 The School Services Division, along with all other departments in the district, is working collaboratively to ensure that the schools are prepared to open their doors for our children on Thursday, August 19. A School Opening/Closing Committee comprised of a representative from each department meets every Wednesday at 1 :30 P.M. in the boardroom to discuss critical issues and make decisions regarding school opening. An oral report will be presented so that board members will be well informed about activities being implemented prior to the first day of school. The appropriate staff will be available to answer questions. The following topics will be shared: a) Start-Up Dates and Times b) Summer School c) Student Assignment and Registration d) StaffDevelopment e) Staffing for Certified and Non-Certified Employees t) Status Report on Assistant Principals g) Status of Facilities h) New Four Year Old Classrooms i) Supplies, Materials, Equipment, Books If you have additional questions, please contact Sadie Mitchell at 447-1133. \u0026gt; r\u0026gt; \"0 m\n,\n:, ~ zz ,m... n $\nz C\u0026gt; m u, :.,,s C: .\n,\n, a, n c: :z: U\u0026gt; 1:\nz m~ ' U\u0026gt; ii: u, 5~ o\u0026lt; .... ~ a, u, C: gi u, ?' I: 0 C: !!l ..\u0026gt;..,, z C\u0026gt; ?' I: z .C..:. m u, School Opening Progress Report 2004-2005 Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:30 P.M. Start-Up Dates and Times All building principals are back on contract Assistant principals will return Monday, July 26 Teachers return on August 11 (EYE -August 2) Students return on August 19 (EYE -August 9) Summer School Summer school ends July 22. Summer school for middle school students is held at Forest Heights Middle School. Ms. Regina Ezell is principal. Forest Heights Middle School has an enrollment of 369 students. 285 students received tuition waiver 84 students paid Summer school for high school students is held at Hall High school. Mr. Jerome Farmer is principal. Hall High School had an enrollment of 396 students the first session and 564 the second session. 549 students received tuition waiver 347 students paid Student Assignment and Registration 1. \"Check-In\" dates are scheduled at each school site August 5 th from 10:00 A.M.- 7:00 P.M .. and August 6th from 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. School starts Thursday, August 19th. 2004. 2. Extended Year Elementary Schools (Cloverdale, Mabelvale, Mitchell, Stephens, and Woodruff) will hold \"Check-In\" from 10:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. on July 28 th and 29th . EYE schools' first day of class will be August 9 th  3. New P4 Classes Additional P4 classes have been created as a result of increased state funding for early childhood education. Classes were added at Brady, Chicot, Dodd, Forest Park, Fulbright, Jefferson, Mabelvale, McDermott, Otter Creek, and Terry. Head start Four Year Old classes were converted to LRSD P4 classes at Meadowcliff, Wakefield, and Washington. Approximately 1100 Four Year Olds have been assigned to classes as ofJuly 15th with 150 district-wide vacancies now available. Families with Four Year Olds may continue to register in the Student Registration Office at 501 Sherman. 4. LRSD Student Assignment Committee Three (3) Community Forums are scheduled: Tuesday. July 20th Little Rock Neighborhood Resource Center 3805 W. 12th Street Little Rock, AR 72204 6:00- 7:30 Thursday, July 29h Dee Brown Library 6325 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 6:00- 7:30 Tuesday, August 10th LRSD Board Room 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 6:00- 7:30 r..\u0026gt;, m\n,o en 0 z z m,... n :::c ~ C) m en .,. ..,s C: .\n,o a, nc: :::c en ~mrzn ' en ~en ::cm 8~ r-m a, en C: en m en ?' ii: 0 C: ~ ..\u0026gt;..,, z C) .,. :c \u0026gt;\n,o no .... C: oz::z:! .. m ~.., ~=l ~,... m\n,o en ?' ii: z C...:. rn Staff Development {Attachment A \u0026amp; B) Training for Principals - July 26-29 Quality Foods \u0026amp; Greater Second Baptist Church August 9 - Orientation for new elementary teachers August 10 - Orientation for new secondary teachers Training for Teachers - Building-level staff development on August 11 Special sessions on August 12 - 13 Staffing for Certified and Non-Certified Employees (Attachment C) Assistant Principals Central High School - recommendation coming to the board Fulbright Elementary School - pending Otter Creek Elementary School - pending McClellan High School- interviewing Status Report on Assistant Principals (Attachment D) ( see attachment) Status of Facilities {Attachment E) Trailers to be moved in preparation for additional classrooms: Two doublewide trailers to support adding a PreK, Kindergarten and third grade classroom to Fulbright completed Two doublewide trailers to support adding one second, third and PreK classroom to Terry completed One doublewide trailer to support adding a second and PreK classroom to Chicot One doublewide trailer to support adding a third and PreK classroom to Forest Park One trailer to support eliminating a split class at Dodd completed Wakefield will be moving into the new facility on Friday, July 23. Mitchell will be moving to Badgett Elementary School after Wakefield has vacated the building. New Four Year Old Classrooms (Attachment F) ( see attachment) Supplies, Materials, Equipment, Books Fifth, sixth and ninth-twelfth grade \"health\" books Sixth-twelfth grade \"Family and Consumer Science\" books Computers are being ordered from the technology bond money by Lucy Neal for schools adding teachers. f) .,, m\n,c (J\u0026gt; 0 z z ,m.... n :,: ~ c\n, m (J\u0026gt; .,,. ..,s c:\n'\n,ca, nc:: :,:V\u0026gt; ~% m~ ' (J\u0026gt; ~(J\u0026gt; 5!ll 0~ r-m a, (J) c:: (J\u0026gt; m (J\u0026gt; !I' I: 0 c:: ~ ..\u0026gt;..,, z c\n, !I' I: z c..:.:. m (J\u0026gt; Attachment A Teachers' Professional Development Schedule August 2 through August 14, 2004 On April 15, 2004, a district-wide planning meeting was held with representatives from the School Services Division and the Curriculum and Instruction Division to plan and coordinate efforts for our teachers' professional development opportunities for the pre-school professional development days and for the school year. The representatives diligently worked all day to coordinate a teacher professional development calendar that would maximize the designated professional development days for district and building use, and that would address the needs of teachers in this district. After much discussion, it was decided that the primary emphasis for the preschool professional development would be on strategies and techniques that would facilitate improved student achievement and teaching in the areas of math, literacy, and science. Attached is a calendar that outlines the specific days when professional development will be observed by our teachers in this district for both regular schools and the extended year schools. Little Rock School District 2004-05 Pro/essional Development Dates Type of Professional Development August 2, 2004 A.M.-Campus Level P.M-District Level-Division of Exceptional Children Issues August 3, 2004 Literacy Summit (EY) August 4, 2004 Campus Level (EY) August 9, 2004 New Teacher Orientation (Elementary Teacllers) /RC August 10, 2004 New Teacher Orientation (Secondary Teacl,ers) /RC August 11, 2004 A.M.-Campus Level P.M.-District Level-Teleconference August 12, 2004 District Level * see attacl,ment August 13, 2004 District Level * see attacllment AUf!USt 16, 2004 Campus Level August 17, 2004 Campus Level September 24, 2004 District Level (EYE) Content Specific October 1, 2004 Elementary-District Level Secondary-Campus Level October 11, 2004 Parental Involvement (EYE) Campus Level October 22, 2004 Parental Involvement Campus Level November 4, 2004 AEA/Joint Conference/ District Level \u0026gt; fl \"'0 m\no ~ z z .m.... (\") ~ C') m (J) :..,s C: \no a, (\") C: :r (J) ~z m~ ' (J) ~(J) 5!ll o\u0026lt; ..... ~ a, (J) C: (J) m (J) !Ji :I: 0 C: .~., z C') !Ji :I: z .C..:. m (J) November 5, 2004 AEA/Joint Conference/ District Level March 25, 2005 Campus Level April 15, 2005 Campus Level {EYE) June 29, 2005 Campus Level (EYE)  EYE - Extended Year Schools.  District Level-Professional Development will be provided by the dislrict.  Campus Level-Professional Development will be provided by the local campuses. Principals' Leadership Institute July 26-29, 2004 Attachrent B As the district focuses on six primary standards for effective leadership this year, every effort will be made to connect the district's professional development for principals and assistant principals to the six standards as listed. 1) Instructional Leadership 2) Organizational Leadership 3) Management Leadership 4) Community Leadership 5) Ethical Leadership 6) Environmental Context Leadership The topics that will be addressed at the July Institute were determined at a district-wide planning meeting held on April 15, 2004, where personnel from the Curriculum and Instruction Division and the School Services Division met all day to identify critical topics and needs for both teachers and administrators. The needs for principals were captured in a survey that was administered to principals in order to ascertain their input. The topics that will be addressed throughout the year have been identified by the building leaders as critical to their professional development, instructional competency, and professional growth. Other topics that will be addressed this year are as follows: Motivating the Staff/Faculty to Maximize Performance Using the Palm Pilot to Monitor the Classroom Walk-through Dealing with Difficult People: Leadership Skills and Interoffice Difficulties Data Analysis and Review: A Closer Look at 2004 Benchmark Results Managing and Dealing with the Difficult Parent (Dr. Todd Whitaker) Instructional Strategies Follow-up Session with Dr. Marcia Tate De-escalating Incidents and Difficult Situations Assessing the Professional Growth Plans: Year II Managing and Investigating Incidents and Allegations with Confidence Preparing for the Arbitration and Grievance Hearing What Every Leader Needs to Know: Student Due Process and IDEA No Child Left Behind Update Using the PTAS Rubrics to Score Teaching Performance Understanding the Context for Leadership: My Leadership Style First Things First: Time and Stress Management Leading, Supporting, and Assessing Reading and Writing Practices Managing the High-Dollar School Budget and Financial Resources \u0026gt; .f.\u0026gt;, m :a is zz ,m... n I C) m u, :.,,s c ::a tD nc ::c UJ 1\nz mrn . u, ~ u, :cm 8~ r-m tD UJ C u, m u, !J' I: 0 C .~,, z C) !J' I: z C.. . rn Tentative Principals' Leadership Institute 2004-05 Calendar DATE SESSION CATEGORY FACULTY LOCATION TIME July 23 , 2004 Safety \u0026amp; Management Robert Jones Washington Security and Margo Magnet 8:30- 10: 15 Health Issues Bushmiaer Discussion 10:30- 3:30 on-Title I Instructional Leon Adams Washington (pre-registered Schools and Leadership Lionel Ward Magnet slots of time) ACSIP Computer Labs Training Management July 26, 2004 A Discipline Instructional Dr. Linda Quality Foods Model: Leadership Watson 8:00-4:00 Aggression Replacement Organizational Dr. Sara Training Leadership Salmon, Trainer \u0026amp; Management Consultant Breakfast Served Leadership (7:30 - 8:00 A.M.) July 27, 2004 What Every Instructional Dr. L. Watson GSBC Leader Needs Leadership Barbara 8:30- 12:00 to Know: Due Barnes Process of Organizational Students \u0026amp; Leadership IDEA 1:00-4:00 Latest Changes Environmental GSBC and State Context Updates with Leadership Janinne NCLB Riggs, Breakfast served Arkansas (7:45 - 8:20 A.M.) Dept. of Education July 28, 2004 Understanding Instructional the LRSD Leadership 8:30 - 4:00 Curriculum and Test-Data Breakfast served Review (7:45 - 8:20) July 29, 2004 PN Instructional Agreement: Leadership 8:30 -12:00 Teacher Policy Review and PTAS Organizational Leadership 1:00-4:00 Strategically Management Planning for Leadership the Year with Breakfast served Your School (7 :45 - 8:20) Team Dennis GSBC Glasgow Dr. Ed Williams Beverly GSBC Williams Dr. L. Sain Dr. Sain GSBC Dr. Mitchell Dr. Price Dr. Lacey Mrs. Jones \u0026gt; !\"\u0026gt; \"ti m\n:o ~ zz ,m... n i\nz C'l m V, :.,s c\n:o a, nc ::c V, l'\n2 mm ' V, V, V, nm ::C\n:o 0\u0026lt; oc5 r-m a, V, C V, m V, !JO I: 0 C V, --\u0026lt; ..\u0026gt;,,,, z C'l .,,.~ \u0026gt;\n:o no --\u0026lt;c 5z::z:! .. m ~i \"0::1 ~,... m\n:o V, !JO I: z C -m-\u0026lt; V, AttachrEnt C '54..n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" July 15, 2004 To: Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent for School Services Frnm~everly Williams, Di,ectm ofHuman Resources RE: Vacancies The table below reflects all vacancies in the schools that the Human Resources Department is aware of as of 11 :00 a.m. today. Obviously with most elementary principals just returning from vacation this week, job offers / recommendations are just now being made. The positions below reflect openings that the HR staff has not received recommendations for hire and thus cannot declare the position as filled. I hope this information is of assistance to you. Areas Number of Vacancies Elementary Art 2 Counselor Music 2 Classroom 1-5 20 Kindergarten 2 GIT 1 Literacy Coach 2 Reading 2 Total Elementary 32 Secondary Physical Education English 7 Science 2 Physics Spanish 5 Total Secondary 23 Special Education 23 Nurse 1.5 Security Officer 5 Aide (Instructional/Special Educ.) 24 District Total 53.5 GRAND TOTAL FOR DISTRICT 108.5 There are other positions open as well as for administrators, secretaries, custodians, and maintenance workers. C: HR Staff 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 Attachrent D Assignment of Assistant Principals In an effort to examine how other neighboring or large school districts determine the employment of assistant principals to schools, we conducted research efforts via phone interviews. District representatives were asked to discuss to what extent they comply with state and orth Central Accreditation (NCA) standards in hiring and placing assistant principals in their elementary and secondary schools. Attached are the results of what we learned about how schools determine the employment of assistant principals. You will also find below the state, NCA, and LRSD guidelines for the employment and placement of assistant principals in schools. State Standard  A school with an enrollment exceeding 500 students will employ a full-time principal and at least one of the following: 1)  time assistant principal or 2) instructional supervisor or 3) curriculum specialist North Central Association (NCA)  An elementary or secondary school with over 250 students will employ a full-time principal.  An elementary school with over 800 students shall employ a  time assistant principal.  Middle schools that have over 500 students shall employ a  time assistant principal.  A secondary school that has over 1,000 students shall employ a full-time assistant principal. Little Rock School District  An elementary school with over 500 students will receive a full-time assistant principal. However, some consideration is given to schools with special program needs (i.e., CBI, TAP).  Middle schools traditionally have received two assistant principals regardless of their enrollment size. A middle school that has a population exceeding 700 students will receive an additional half-time assistant principal who is a part-time teacher in the building. However, some consideration is given to schools with environmental or special programming needs in placing additional assistant principals.  For every 350 students, a high school receives an assistant principal. However, some consideration is given to schools with environmental or special programming needs in placing additional assistant principals. \u0026gt; !.,\",' m ~ z z ~ C') ::,: ~ C') m \"' :..,s c  ::ca, nc :,:en \u0026gt;z mm m. u\",' ~\"' :,:m 8~ r-m a,\"' C \"m' \"' !JI I: 0 C ~....,, z C') .,,.~ \u0026gt;::C no -\u0026lt;c oz::z:! .. m ~.,, ~.... !I:! .... ,-m ~ !JI I: z C... . m \"' School Contact Person Standard Current Additional District Compliance Practice on Information on Hiring APs Hirin!:! APs Rogers Dr. Jane Wesson, Used to Present Twelve of School HR Director employ the accountability their 13 District state standard, and demands elementary but the on school schools have a expanding role principals full-time of the principal forced the principal. The caused the district to middle district to place full- schools have 2 abandon. time assistant assistant principals in principals. the buildings. Van Buren Mr. Lonnie Complies with K-6-The The district School Myers, Assistant the state district has basically District Superintendent regulation embraces the hired only. The Teacher additional elementary Advancement personnel that schools only Program and support have a full- encourages teaching and time principal. more faculty learning. support employment At the two than middle schools administrator (500 students), employment. they do have an assistant Junior High - principal. Curriculum Design At the two Coaches were junior high employed to schools (700 support the students), they curriculum have an and assistant instruction principal. efforts. High schools (1,150 students)- The district employs three APs. Fort Smith Dr. Johnny Complies with Of the 19 School Owens, Deputy the state elementary District Superintendent standard but schools, only looks at other 6 schools factors/formula have an AP. (i.e., socio- At the junior economic high (600- factors, ESL 800 students, enrollment), enrollment, \u0026amp; two assistant mobility). We principals. use a formula At the two to determine high schools, the assignment they have of additional three assistant assistant principals. principals. Springdale Mr. Hartzell Uses the state Currently, all School Jones, Deputy standard as a of their District Superintendent .. mm1mum elementary guideline in schools (500- assigning 700 students) assistant have an AP. principals. The two middle schools (close to 1,000 students) have two APs. The three junior highs (700-800 enrollment) have two APs. The one high school (2, 800) has one AP. Each year, the district examines the needs of schools, enrollment, and the resources to determine the assignment of an AP. Other factors such as teacher evaluation, school accountability, safety, special education monitoring and compliance, and NCLB demands warranted an AP in most of their schools regardless of the enrollment. \u0026gt; f) .,, m :a is zz m,.... n ~ C) m en :.,,s c::: \nt,a:J nc::: :z: en \u0026gt;z enm men  en ~ en 6 !B 0~ r-m a, en c::: en m en !I' E 0 c::: e..n.. ..\u0026gt;..,, z C) ~~ \u0026gt;\nic no -\u0026lt;c::: oz:z:! .. m t.,~,~ ~m r-\n,c en !I' E z c..:.::. emn Benton Mr. Dan Jordan, Complies with This year, the one School Assistant state district will District Superintendent of regulations but hire an AP Personnel/Student this past year, for the 4 Services two APs were elementary hired to work schools who half day in two will serve as assigned AP half day elementary and as a schools. The curriculum secondary coordinator schools have 2 for a half day. APs. Pulaski Mrs. Susan Does not At the The district County Alford, comply with elementary believes it Special Administrative the state level, a does better School Assistant regulations school with than the state District because of the an enrollment standard. small between 325- enrollment. 600 gets an AP. Regardless of enrollment, the If it exceeds secondary 600, the schools will school gets an have an AP. additional AP. At the secondary level, they all have one AP. Schools with 500-899 enrollment will have an additional AP. A school that exceeds 900 will get an additional AP. North Mr. Danny Reed, Uses the state No specific Little Rock Administrative andNCA rubric or School Director of standards as written District Personnel/Special the minimum guidelines are Services requirement\nestablished. however, some The district of your smaller places APs schools under based on 500 enrollment special do have AP. program needs, size, and school improvement status. Special program needs and school improvement status may affect the placing of additional assistant principals in some schools. \u0026gt; r, \"0 m\n,c Cl) 0 z z I!! n ::c ~ C) m Cl) :.,s c \n,c CD nc :CC/) \u0026gt;z \"m'm\"'  Cl) ~Cl) :cm 8~ r-m CD Cl) C ~ Cl) !XI\nI: 0 C C_l,) ..\u0026gt;,,,, z C) !XI\nI: z C_ , m Cl) School HIGH SCHOOLS Central Fair Hall McClellan Metro Parkview MIDDLE SCHOOLS Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heiqhts Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Heiqhts Southwest ELEMENTARY Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Geyer Sprinqs Gibbs Jefferson Assistant Principals Little Rock School District Enrollment Present October 1, 2003 2111 2424 1023 1149 1327 1392 1006 1046 1131 1132 791 708 757 799 781 711 663 661 654 647 868 882 725 705 519 529 325 328 298 281 606 633 338 327 501 512 485 477 382 351 205 216 206 181 347 387 384 376 503 560 314 290 314 311 403 423 FTE's 6 3 4 4 0 4 1 3 2.5 2.5 2 2 3 2.5 2 1 1 1 School Enrollment October 1, 2003 King 584 Mabelvale 249 McDermott 371 Meadowcliff 327 Mitchell 255 Otter Creek 452 Pulaski HeiQhts 285 Rightsell 292 Rockefeller 393 Romine 277 Stephens 547 Terry 514 Wakefield 347 Washington 466 Watson 497 Western Hills 296 Williams 461 Wilson 283 Woodruff 257 Present FTE's 611 1 235 385 312 181 524 290 217 462 1 333 475 1 583 1 395 574 1 469 263 465 1 270 202 \u0026gt; r..,, m\n,o Cl) 0z z m r(\") :z: ~ G') m Cl) :.is C: .\n,o CD (\") C: %Cl\u0026gt; \u0026gt;z cnm mcn  Cl) \"\u0026lt;\"'\u0026gt;\"m' :Z:\n,o 0\u0026lt; 0\u0026lt;'5 r- m CDCI\u0026gt; C: Cl) m Cl) ?\u0026gt; :\u0026lt; \u0026gt;::O \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;0 ... C: 5z::z::! .. m .~., I..:. ! ... .... ~ Cl) !D 31: z .C..: m Cl) Attachrent E Directorate of Facility Services, 3601 S Bryant, Little Rock, AR 72204 To: Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Ed. D. Associate Superintendent, School Services From: Douglas Eaton Director, Facility Services Subject: School Update Date: 7/15/04 Attached is an update of significant activities in preparation for the 04-05 SY. For clarification, notes: stating \"no work\" refers to schools with no capital projects, \"general cleaning\" refers to normal custodial preparation, \"gym\" refers to floor refinishing. If you have any questions, please let me know. ls/Doug SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SITE SCHOOL 1 CENTRAL Construction ongoing, 2/3 cent flr, gym complete late summer, start 1st flr S 8 J.A FAIR Construction complete, finishing details, gym flr refinish\n7/15-7/18 2 HALL No construction, general cleaning , gym refinish 7/9-7/10 12 MCCLELLAN Construction onaoing, complete late summer, resurface park lot, early fall, gym floor done 5 PARKVIEW Construction onQoina, comp fall, gym refinish 7/18-7/22, paint bid late fall, resurface park lot 4 METROPOLITAN Construction complete. Doino details, general cleaning MIDDLE SCHOOLS 15 CLOVERDALE No construction, Qeneral cleaninQ 7 DUNBAR Construction ongoinQ, media center comp. late summer, gym done 9 FOREST HEIGHTS No construction, general cleaning, gym refinish 7n-7!8 13 HENDERSON No construction, install lockers early fall, gym done, general cleaning 16 MABELVALE No construction, gym done, general cleaning, movinQ portables, resurface parking lot summer 3 MANN No construction, minor details finish up, general cleaninQ. 10 PULASKI HEIGHTS Construction onaoina, media center comp. late summer, gym done 11 SOUTHWEST Construction onaoina, complete late summer, gym 7/11-7/14 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 19 BADGETT Moving Wakefield staff out/Mitchell in 17 BALE No work general cleaninQ 22 BASELINE Construction ongoing, complete late summer 6 BOOKER Construction replacing gym roof, complete July 04 18 BRADY Construction ongoing, new add complete late summer, room hvac/ceilings ongoing to early fall 21 CARVER no work aeneral cleaning 28 CHICOT Exterior construction complete, insulation complete late summer. Ins portable, fire alarm uDQrade 31 CLOVERDALE No work Qeneral cleanina 32 DODD No work Qeneral cleanina. Install portable, uDQrading fire alarm 23 FAIR PARK No work general cleaning, start design for bond projects 24 FOREST PARK No work general cleaning, installing portable 25 FRANKLIN No work general cleaning 48 FULBRIGHT No work aeneral cleanina, installina portables 26 GARLAND No work aeneral cleanina 37 GEYER SPRINGS No work Qeneral cleaninQ 27 GIBBS No work general cleaning , start design bond project 30 JEFFERSON No work general cleaning 35 KING No work general cleanina 46 MABELVALE No work aeneral cleanina, uparadinQ fire alarm 20 MCDERMOTT No work Qeneral cleaninQ, uDQrading fire alarm 33 MEADOWCLIFF No work Qeneral cleaning, start design bond project 34 MITCHELL Construction ongoing for remediation, complete late summer 50 OTTERCREEK No work general cleaning 38 PULASKI HEIGHTS Construction ongoing, complete late summer, except parking lot. 39 RIGHTSELL No work aeneral cleanina 36 ROCKEFELLER No work aeneral cleanina 40 ROMINE No work Qeneral cleaninQ 47 TERRY No work general cleaning, installing portables 51 WAKEFIELD Construction ongoing, to be open early August 42 WASHINGTON No work general cleaning, upgradina fire alarm 52 WATSON No work aeneral cleanina 29 WESTERN HILLS No work aeneral cleaning, upQrading fire alarm 43 WILLIAMS Finishing construction detail list. Resurface park lot. 44 WILSON No work general cleaning 45 WOODRUFF No work general cleaning 14 ALT LEARNING CTR. No work general cleaning 7/17/2004 SCHOOLS \u0026gt; r, \"ti m\na :g z z m r n $\nz C) m en :.,,s c\na a, n c: ::c en ~z mUl ' en !!l en 5!:l o\u0026lt; rhi a, en C: en m en !Jl !I: 0 C: !!l ..\u0026gt;..,,,, z C) !Jl :i::: z .C...:. m en ATTACHMENT F July 15, 2004 TO: Sadie Mitchell, Ed. D. Associate Superintendent - School Services FR: Krista Underwood - Director - Early Childhood RE: Report on Expansion of the Pre-K Program Please see attached chart for additional information. Schools Approved for Funding by ABCSS (First group of schools shown on the chart) In the seventeen schools which were approved for funding, the district had hoped to open twelve (12) new Pre-K classrooms in the following schools: Baseline (1 new classroom) Brady (1) Chicot (2) Cloverdale (1) Dodd (1) Mabel vale( 1) Stephens (1) Wakefield (1) Washington (2) Wilson (1) On the chart, the number of potential classrooms to be added is shown in column E: # added classrooms. After working with student registration and trying to project the level of interest in the community, of the twelve potentially new classrooms, the district decided to open seven (7) new classrooms in the following schools: Brady, Chicot (1 classroom only), Dodd, Mabelvale, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington (1 only) On the chart, these numbers are shown in column H: # classrooms adding. The district also decided to \"hold\" or delay opening new classrooms in the following schools until there was more assurance we would have students to fill the classrooms: Baseline, Cloverdale, Chicot (1), Washington (1) and Wilson On the chart, these numbers are shown in column I:# classrooms holding. Schools Eligible but Not Approved for ABCSS Funding (Second group of schools on the chart) The district decided to hold opening new classrooms in the non-funded schools except for Meadowcliff and Otter Creek. See justification for Otter Creek below. Schools Not Eligible for ABCSS Funding (Third group of schools on the chart) Because of the level of demand for Pre-K classrooms in these schools (Fulbright, Jefferson, Terry, Otter Creek, McDermott, and Forest Park), the district decided to open one additional classroom ( 6 total) in each of those schools. These schools are shown in the last group of schools listed on the chart. Even though these schools were not eligible for funding, it was the decision of the district to divert district funding that would be the source of funds for the seventeen funded schools to expansion of the Pre-K classrooms in these schools. All of the procedures and activities for opening the 12 new classrooms are currently in motion. \u0026gt; .f.l, m\na en 0 z z ,m.... C'l ::c ~ C\u0026gt; m en :..,:s c \na a, nc ::c en l\nz mUl ' en !!l en :cm 0~ 0\u0026lt;\"5 r-m a, en C gi en !\"' I: 0 C ~ ..\u0026gt;..,, z C\u0026gt; !\"' 3r:: z .C.. . m en School # #Pre # PreK Funding # Kinder K Clsrm added 2004-05 Status clsrms clsrms classes now classrooms adding holding 1 Bale 3 2 0 2 ApproYed 0 0 2 Baseline 2 2 l 3 ApproYed 0 l 3 Brach- 3 1 1 2 AooroYed i 0 4 Chicot 5 2 2 4 ApproYed 1 l 5 CloYerdale 4 2 1 3 AooroYed 0 1 6 Dodd 2 l 1 2 ApproYed 1 0 7 Fair Park 2 2 0 2 AoorO\\ed 0 0 8 Franklin 3 ., 0 3 ApprO\\ed 0 0 9 King 5 4 0 4 ApprO\\ed 0 0 10 MableYale 2 l l 2 ApproYed l 0 11 Mitchell i -t- G G ApproYed G 0 12 Rockefeller 3 4 0 2 AooroYed 0 0 13 Stephens 4 3 1 4 ApprO\\ed l 0 14 Wakefield 3 l 1 2 AooroYed l 0 15 Washington 5 3 2 5 Approyed l 1 16 Watson 4 2 0 2 ApproYed 0 0 17 Wilson 2 l 1 2 AoproYed 0 l 18 Woodmff (ABC) 2 2 0 2 Appro,ed-Renewal 0 0 TOTAL 54 35 12 44 7 5 19 Can-er 4 0 l l Not AooroYed 0 l 20 Gever Sorine:s 3 2 1 3 Not Approved 0 1 21 Meadowcliff 3 l 1 2 Not Appro\\'ed l 0 22 Otter Creek 4 l l 2 Not AooroYed l 0 23 Riuhtsell (ABC) 2 2 0 2 Not AooroYed 0 0 24 Romine (ABC) 3 2 1 3 Not Aooroved 0 1 25 Western Hills 2 1 l 2 Not ApprO\\ed 0 1 TOTAL 21 9 6 15 2 4 26 Booker 5 0 0 0 Non-elig 0 0 27 Forest Park 3 l 1 2 Non-elie: l 0 28 Fulbright 4 l l 2 Non-elig l 0 29 Gibbs 2 0 0 0 Non-elie: 0 0 30 Jefferson 2 l 1 2 Non-elig 1 0 31 McDermott 3 1 1 2 Non-elig 1 0 32 Pulaski Heights 2 1 0 1 Non-elig 0 0 33 Tem 5 1 1 2 Non-elig 1 0 34 Williams 3 0 0 0 Non-elig 0 0 TOTAL 29 6 5 11 5 0 TOTAL 104 50 23 70 14 9 DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKA SAS July 22, 2004 Board of Education ~ Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Roy Brooks, Superintendent of Schools Perso1U1el Changes It is recommended that the following perso1mel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 are considered intern teachers. \u0026gt; :.,,s c  ::a to nc :z: V, i'\nZ m~  V, ~ V, :z:m g~ r-m to u, C V, m V, !:D 31: 0 C ~ ..\u0026gt;..,, z Cl .r.\u0026gt;, z \u0026gt;z n ~ V, ~~ ~p co \u0026lt;- V, ocZ\na Cl z::a\ncm .~.... ~::a\n:,,\nu, -~~----------- Personnel Changes Page 2 July 22 , 2004 NAME Alexander, Reba Reason: Contract Ended Andrews, Ashley Reason: Contract Ended Bartholorne\\\\, Roseleta Reason: Contract Ended Beggs, Melinda Reason: Contract Ended Birtcher, James Reason: Contract Ended Berry, Laura Reason: None Given Blalock, Kellie Reason: Leaving City Bledsoe, Fred Reason: Contract Ended Botner, Janice Reason: Retired Brandt, Nancy Reason: Retired POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Emplovees Cosmetology 9-29-03 1-05 METRO. 6-1-04 TCH950 Elem. Tutor 2-16-04 1-01 BALE 5-28-04 TCH925 Alt. Skills 10-8-03 1-04 ACC 5-28-04 TCH925 English 1-20-04 4- 19 CE TRAL 5-28-04 TCH925 Law Enforcement 9-8-03 1-13 METRO. 5-28-04 TCH925 Special Ed. 8-7-02 5- 15 FRANKLIN 7-2-04 SPE925 Elem II 8-7-03 1-02 GEYER SPRINGS 7-1-04 TCH925 Art 1-20-04 1-01 MCCLELLAN 5-28-04 TCH925 ElemV 8-18-80 4- 19 MCDERMOTT 5-28-04 TCH925 Librarian 8-24-78 6-2 1 WESTERN HILLS 5-28-04 C L950 ANNUAL SALARY 33506.00 30040.00 32350.00 54561.00 42729.00 51154.00 30617.00 30040.00 49737.00 54700.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 July 22 , 2004 NAME Brown, Carleton Reason: Contract Ended Brown, Verlyn Reason: Contract Ended Brown, William Reason: Contract Ended Burgess, Karen Reason: Retired Cain, Mruy Reason: Contract Ended Carter, Arre! Reason: Contract Ended Cherepski, Donald Reason: Contract Ended Christensen, Kevin Reason: Contract Ended Crossley, Demetria Reason: Contract Ended Davis, Lavera Reason: Retired Delozier, Mary Gail Reason: Retired POSITION SCHOOL English CE TRAL Elem. Tutor FAIR.PARK Math CE TRAL Elem Il MEADOW CLIFF ElemV GEYER SPRINGS Special Ed. ALC Leaming Skills MCCLELLAN Economics CE TRAL Math START DATE END DATE 1-20-04 5-28-04 2-23-04 5-28-04 9-10-03 5-28-04 8-21-78 5-28-04 1-20-04 5-28-04 2-9-04 5-28-04 9-24-03 5-28-04 9-29-03 5-28-04 2-13-04 CLOVERDALE MID. 5-28-04 Voe. Bus. 7-30-98 HALL 6-16-04 Elem I 8-21-73 FAIR.PARK 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCH925 1-10 TCH925 2-12 TCH925 3-18 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 1-06 SPE925 6-11 TCHl0 1-02 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 5-20 TCH10 4-19 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 34575.00 35711.00 43095.00 47294.00 32350.00 34661.00 48121.00 30617.00 32350.00 52205.00 49737.00 \u0026gt; :..,s c \no CD C'\u0026gt;C ::c VJ l\nZ mm  VJ !': VJ s~ 0,-m~ CD VJ C VJ m VJ !Jl 31: 0 !:: VJ -\u0026lt; \u0026gt;-n -n z C\u0026gt; 0 -n z \u0026gt;z C'\u0026gt; \u0026gt; r- VJ ~~ :i,_p co o\u0026lt;-\"-' cZ\no C\u0026gt; ~~ ~!f: -\u0026lt;\no\n,,\n\"' Personnel Changes Page 4 July 22, 2004 NAME Dyer, Julie Reason: Contract Ended Fall, Libasse Reason: Contract Ended Farrar, eoma Reason: Contract Ended Ford, Tom Reason: Retired Fornero, Dan Reason: Retired Frasier, Coreen Reason: Retired Gilliam, Jacqueline Reason: Personal Glassco, Belinda Reason: Retired Green, Michelle Reason: Contract Ended Griffin, Kelli Reason: Accepted Another Position Griffin, Valarie Reason: Personal POSITION SCHOOL Elem IV STEPHE s Spanish I CENTRAL Elem Tutor CHICOT ElemV WAKEFIELD Yoe. Data Proc. DUNBAR Elem PE ROCKEFELLER Kindergarten DODD Special Ed. FAIR Elem Tutor BALE Elem I WASHINGTON Elem III MITCHELL START DATE END DATE 1-22-04 6-29-04 1-29-03 5-28-04 2-16-04 5-28-04 8-7-03 5-28-04 7-17-03 5-31-04 8-27-74 5-28-04 8-13-01 5-28-04 8-24-92 5-28-04 2-23-04 5-28-04 8-13-01 7-1-04 8-13-01 6-29-04 SALARY CLASS 1-05 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-13 TCH925 5-20 TCHl0 4-19 TCH925 1-14 K925 5-20 SPE925 1-01 TCH925 2-08 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 33506.00 30617.00 30040.00 42985.00 52205.00 49737.00 39913.00 57276.00 30040.00 38474.00 28359.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 July 22, 2004 NAME Gurley, Tara Reason: Contract Ended Harder, Melanie Reason: Contract Ended HaITison, Kenneth Reason: Contract Ended Hemphill, James Reason: Contract Ended Hines, Thana Reason: Contract Ended Horne, Wanda Reason: Contract Ended Howard-Klein, Risie Reason: Contract Ended Howse, Marion Reason: Contract Ended Jackson, Marlo Reason: Ce1i. Expired James, Charlotte Reason: Retired Jolmson, Marcus Reason: Contract Ended POSITION SCHOOL Kindergarten STEPHE s Phy. Science FAIR Geometry Leaving City Spanish I MCCLELLAN G\u0026amp;T MEADOW CLIFF Special Ed. HENDERSON Chemistry MCCLELAN Alt. Skills ALC ElemV MEADOW CLIFF Elem IV WATSON Instr. Music MANN START DATE END DATE 8-25-03 6-29-04 1-20-04 5-28-04 1-22-04 5-28-04 11-20-03 5-28-04 8-20-03 5-28-04 2-17-04 5-28-04 8-18-95 5-28-04 10-13-03 5-28-04 8-7-03 7-1-04 8-31-70 5-28-04 4-2-04 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 1-02 K925 2-03 TCH925 4-18 TCH925 1-06 TCH925 2-05 G\u0026amp;T925 1-04 SPE925 4-08 TCH925 6-21 TCH925 4-08 TCH925 6-21 TCH925 1-0 I TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30617.00 32697.00 53061.00 34661.00 35008.00 29409.00 37733.00 60020.00 41507.00 54700.00 30040.00 \u0026gt; :,,s c\n,:,a, oc ::c\"' l\n:\n2 mg) ~' \"\"'' :cm 0~ ,0-\u0026lt;'m5 a,\"' C \"m' \"' !I' :I: 0 C\n--\u0026lt; ..\u0026gt;..,, z C) .r.,, z \u0026gt; z 0 ,)\u0026gt;- \"' ~ ~ 0 c\u0026gt;ro- co'-Z\"-'\n,:, C) z\n,:, 3:::m ~~ --\u0026lt;\n,:,\n:,: \"' Personnel Changes Page 6 July 22, 2004 NAME Jones, Katherine Reason: Accepted Another Position Kesler, Martha Reason: Contract Ended King, Can11elita Reason: Contract Ended Kuhn, Scarlett Reason: Contract Ended Lane, Therese Reason: Leaving City Lark, Wilda Reason: Contract Ended Larkowski, Alm Reason: Personal Larry, Betty Reason: Contract Ended Lee, Canaa Reason: Contract Ended Lockhart, Kelly Reason: Contract Ended Logan, Jacob Reason: Contract Ended POSITION SCHOOL Kindergarten MEADOW CLIFF Librarian START DATE END DATE 8-7-03 6-22-04 8-22-03 CLOVERDALE MID.6-7-04 English 2-23-04 FAIR 5-28-04 Elem III 1-26-04 STEPHENS 6-29-04 Elem. IV 8-13-01 GEYER SPRINGS 7-28-04 Math Coach 9-2-03 DODD 5-28-04 Counselor 8-20-90 ROCKEFELLER 5-28-04 Keyboarding 2-5-04 MABELV ALE MID. 5-28-04 Math 10-20-03 CE TRAL 5-28-04 Pre-Algebra 2-16-04 PUL. HGTS. MID. 5-28-04 American History 9-8-03 MABELV ALE MID. 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 K925 1-07 LIB950 4-06 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 1-15 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 4-14 CNL925 4-01 TCH925 2-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30040.00 35816.00 39196.00 33506.00 45059.00 29409.00 44035.00 34575.00 32697.00 30040.00 30617.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 July 22 , 2004 NAME McCarther, Geraldine Reason: Retired McDaniel, Yv01me Reason: Contract Ended McPeake, Karen Reason: Accepted Another Position Maher, Donna Reason: Contract Ended Miller, Qwyla Reason: Contract Ended Moore, Janice Reason: Retired Muhanmiad, Khaleelah Reason: Contract Ended Neumeier, Cynthia Reason: Contract Ended Ogden, Marolyn Reason: Retired Oshea, Christine Reason: Contract Ended Pan-, Patricia Reason: Contract Ended POSITION SCHOOL ElemV MCDERMOTT Elem. Ill START DATE END DATE 8-21-89 5-28-04 1-14-04 CLOVERDALE EL. 6-29-04 Libra1ian 8-10-98 ROMINE 6-9-04 Inst. Music 8-25-03 MABELVALE MID. 5-28-04 Special Ed. 3-2-04 M 5-28-04 Elem II 8-24-87 MABEL VALE EL. 6-29-04 Elem IV 1-14-04 STEPHE s 6-29-04 Elem II 1-5-04 MCDERMOTT 5-28-04 Elem II 8-22-77 WILSON 8-7-04 Elem Tutor 3-25-04 WAKEFIELD 5-28-04 ElemV 2-9-04 FAIR.PARK 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 5-20 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-13 LIB950 6-05 TCH925 1-03 SPE925 2-17 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 1-07 TCH925 6-21 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 4-14 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 52205.00 30040.00 42985.00 41189.00 31195.00 44879.00 30617.00 32560.00 54700.00 31431.00 44035.00 \u0026gt; :.,,s c \nDID n::c c V, ~z mm ' V, l!l V, :cm 0~ O,..\u0026lt;..m\"'i ID v, C V, m V, !I' I: 0 C\n..... ..\u0026gt;..,, z G) 0.., z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; r- V, ~~ ~p co L.. V, ocZ-\nD G) ~~ ~ ~ --t\nD :,:: V, Personnel Changes Page 8 July 22, 2004 NAME Pierce, Lizete Reason: Contract Ended Pugh, Linda Reason: Retired Richardson, Shoutell Reason: Leaving City Robinson, Preston Reason: Contract Ended Scrubbs, Verna POSITION SCHOOL Spanish I CE TRAL Kinderga11en WESTERN HILLS Leaming Skills WILSO Civics HALL Elem ill Reason: Not Returning From BOOKER Leave Sherwood,Sherry Elem III Reason: Retired FAIR PARK Smith, Laura Speech Path Reason: Leaving City MABELV ALE EL. Smith, Michelle Elem II Reason: Contract Ended MCDERMOTT Snider, Adrie1me Elem II Reason: Contract Ended MITCHELL Sutton, Wilma Social Studies Reason: Contract Ended MANN Thom, Ellen Elem IV Reason: Contract Ended RIGHTSELL START DATE END DATE 1-6-04 5-28-04 2-1-80 5-28-04 8-14-95 6-30-04 10-6-03 5-28-04 8-21-89 6-1-04 9-21-87 5-28-04 8-12-99 5-28-04 1-5-04 5-28-04 8-18-03 6-29-03 10-13-03 5-28-04 10-20-03 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 1-03 TCH925 4-19 K925 5-10 TCHII 6-10 TCH925 2-17 TCH925 1-17 TCH925 62-16 SPE925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 3-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 31195.00 49737.00 45377.00 46966.00 44879.00 43513.00 57384.00 27309.00 27309.00 31195.00 30040.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 July 22, 2004 NAME Thomas, Shauna Reason: Contract Ended Treat, Heather Reason: Contract Ended Walker, Charles Reason: Contract Ended Watkins, Cindy Reason: Contract Ended Watson, Charlotte Reason: Contract Ended Watson, Fredonia Reason: Retired West, Angela Reason: Contract Ended White, Susan Reason: Contract Ended Williams, Kay Reason: Retired Wilson, Edna Reason: Retired Wise, Marshalette Reason: Contract Ended POSITION SCHOOL lnst. Music FOREST HEIGHTS Elem I CHICOT Alt. Skills ALC Spanish I DUNBAR Business Ed. ALC 4 Yr. Old ROCKEFELLER Elem I WILSO Economics FAIR Counselor WILSON Gen. Music WAKEFIELD English HENDERSON START DATE END DATE I 0-15-03 5-28-04 2-2-04 5-28-04 1-5-04 5-28-04 1-14-04 5-28-04 3-29-04 5-28-04 8-27-84 5-28-04 10-20-03 5-28-04 9-26-03 5-28-04 1-21-88 5-28-04 8-24-87 8-9-04 1-12-04 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 1-10 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 4-08 TCH928 1-16 TCH925 6-04 TCH925 5-20 4YROLD 5-11 TCH925 4-05 TCH925 6-21 C L925 4-18 TCH925 4-04 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 39283.00 30040.00 41507.00 42013.00 40034.00 52205.00 42302.00 38041.00 54700.00 53061.00 33532.00  :,,s c::\n:ca:, (\")C:: :z: en i\nZ mill ' en !!l en 6~ o\u0026lt; .... ~ a:, en c:: en m en !I\u0026gt; !I: 0 ~ e..n.. ....,, z (\n) .0., z  z (\") \u0026gt;,... en ~~ :,.~ 00 o\u0026lt;- e-n c::Z\n:c(\n) z\n:c\ni:m ~~ --\u0026lt;\n:c\n,: en Personnel Changes Page 10 July 22, 2004 NAME Withers, Aaron Reason: Contract Ended Williams, Frank NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Music ROMINE START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 5-28-04 New Certified Employees Music 8-2-04 MABELV ALE MID. Certified Promotion Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 1-04 TCH925 6-08 TCH925 Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Anglin, Elizabeth Nurse 10-18-71 2-15 Reason: Retired MITCHELL 6-29-04 NURSES Briggs, Bobby Custodian 3-6-00 2-15 Reason: Retired FOREST HEIGHTS 7-1-04 CUS12 Corbin, Marquitta Instr. Aide 7-1-02 1-02 Reason: Returning To School FOREST HEIGHTS 5-11-04 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 29409.00 44655.00 42328.00 42328.00 11425.00 Personnel Changes Page 11 July 22 , 2004 NAME Dwyer,Mike Reason: Contract Ended Fortenberry, Carolyn Reason: None Given Golston, Shawn Reason: Position Eliminated Jennings, Phillip Reason: Leaving City Jones, Shirley Reason: Retired Jordan, Patricia Reason: Retired Hartaway, Amiee Reason: Retired Henderson, Bernice Reason: Retired Hughes, Helen Reason: Retired Perkins, Viola Reason: Retired Moore, Eddie Reason: Retired POSITION SCHOOL Social Worker START DATE END DATE 10-2-01 PUPIL PERSONNEL 6-8-04 Bus Driver 1-29-04 TRANSPORT A TIO 5-19-04 Security Officer 8-11-03 SAFETY SECURITY 7-1-04 Custodian 1-26-01 WILLIAMS 6-3-04 Instr. Aide 8-23-89 WASHINGTO 6-30-04 Instr. Aide 8-28-78 ROCKEFELLER 5-28-04 Child uttition 2-4-98 WILLIAMS 5-28-04 Instr. Aide 8-23-76 ROCKEFELLER 6-30-04 Instr. Aide 9-30-80 MEADOW CLIFF 5-28-04 Child Nutrition 2-19-93 MCDERMOTT 4-21-04 Custodian 7-1-92 PUL. HGTS. MID. 7-2-94 SALARY CLASS 37-20 A 10 2-02 BUSDRV 37-20 A 10 1-03 CUS12 l-10 INA925 l-10 INA925 2-06 FSMGRS 1-10 INA12 1-04 INA185 3-11 FSH550 31-61 CUS12 ANNUAL SALARY 30660.00 12108.00 30660.00 14953.00 14472.00 14472.00 14837.00 18683.00 12513.00 8767.00 22752.00 \u0026gt; :.,,~ C:\nc CD 0 C: :t:m \u0026gt;z mmmm ' m !!l m s~ o\u0026lt; r-i:\\ CD m C: mm m !I' 31: 0 ~ m.... ..\u0026gt;..,, z G) .0., z \u0026gt;z (\") ,\u0026gt;... m ~~ ~p co o\u0026lt;- m- c:Z\nc G) z\nc 3:m ~\n....\nc\n,\nm Personnel Changes Page 12 July 22 , 2004 NAME Siepiola, Amanda Reason: Personal Thomas, Jimmie Reason: Retired Thompson, Lee Reason: Personal Thomas, Deborah Reason: Position Eliminated Tinkle, Betty Reason: Retired Weaver, Nellieann Reason: Position Eliminated Williams, Kimberly POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide MABEL VALE EL. Child Nutrition OTTERCREEK Maintenance FACILITY SERV. Instr. Aide GEYER SPRINGS Secretary CENTRAL Instr. Aide STEPHENS Instr. Aide Reason: Returning To School CHICOT START DATE END DATE 9-3-03 6-29-04 8-3-99 5-28-04 3-15-01 7-1-04 8-7-02 5-29-03 8-10-92 7-5-04 1-14-04 6-29-04 9-8-87 8-1-04 SALARY CLASS 1-10 INA925 2-10 FSMGRS 49-05 MAINT. 1-08 INSTRC 39-20 CLKl0 1-10 INA925 1-10 INA925 New Non-Certified Employees Bonner, Ashley Instr. Aide 6-14-04 1-10 ROCKEFELLER INA12 Smith, Margaret Instr. Aide 6-7-04 1-06 ROCKEFELLER INA12 ANNUAL SALARY 14472.00 15009.00 28032.00 19520.00 32544.00 14472.00 14472.00 18718.00 14047.00 aimual 1075.94 prorated Personnel Changes Page 13 July 22, 2004 NAME ONE ONE POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE on-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY \u0026gt; :.,,s C: .\nJ:J CD (\") C: :z:u, \u0026gt;z \"m'mu, . \"' ~\"' 5!ll .o--\u0026lt;i:i CD u, C: gi \"' !I' :I: 0 C: .~...,, z Cl f.\".), z z\u0026gt; (\") ~ \"' ':54n Individual Approach to a LP'orld of Kno1vledge\" TRANSPORTATIO DEPARTME T July 22, 2004 To: Board of Directors From: ~\\~ It\\ Michael Martello, Director of Transportation Through: ~Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services Roy G. Brooks, Ed. D., Superintendent Subject: Purchase of School Buses The District established a ten-year cycle to update the transportation fleet for special needs students. Presently, we have eleven ( 11) buses that have been in service in excess of ten years. In order to stay on cycle we need to purchase eight (8) buses for the 2004- 2005 school year. Enrollment at the Alternative Leaming Centers (ALC and Garland) is projected to increase by 25% next year, as evidenced by the Board-approved expansion at the June 24 Board meeting. Three of the eight new buses will be used to transport these students. The total cost of these eight buses will be approximately $480,000. It is estimated that if financed over a seven-year period, the District would have an annual payment of about $83,000. Funding for these buses has already been included in the 2004-2005 Draft Budget. It is recommended that the Board approve the purchase and financing of eight (8) buses and authorize the administration to proceed with the procurement process. 810 \\YJ. 1arkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  ,vww.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !:D ~ 0 C: !!l ..\u0026gt;..,, z Cl 0.., z \u0026gt;z (\") ,.... \"' Date: To: From: July 22, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Little Rock School District Board of Directors Dr. Roy G. Brooks, Superintendent of Schools Prepared by: Ms. Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Dr. Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent for Schools Mr. Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services Memorandum of understanding regarding the vote of the Board on staffing issues I June 24, 2004 After a thorough review of the minutes of the Board meeting held on Thursday, June 24, 2004, it was determined that the consensus of the Board was to approve the following staffing positions: Elementary Teachers 12.0 Elementary Teachers - split classroom 5.0 Elementary Consulting Teachers 15.0 Secondary Teachers 23.9 ALC - Garland 9.5 ALC - Apperson 6.0 Total New Positions from the 71.4 Operating Budget 2004-05 A more detailed breakdown of positions by school is attached for the Board's information. The Board approved the proposed increase of nineteen (19) new Pre-K classrooms contingent upon receipt of ABCSS grant funds from the Arkansas Department of Education. As with any classroom positions, these teachers will only be hired if the number of students requires these additional positions. Adjustments with regard to specific schools and grades may be warranted as the student population shifts throughout the District. It is the recommendation of the Superintendent that the elementary consulting teachers be employed after all the regular classrooms are staffed. It is also his recommendation that the positions at the ALC (both Garland and Apperson) be staffed only after evidence that the enrollment at these sites is sufficient to justify the positions. We are asking at this time for the Board to take action to reaffirm the intent of their consensus vote on June 24, 2004. , I ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER JUNE 30, 2004 SITE # of TYPES of POSITIONS POSITIONS APPERSON 4.0 Teachers 2.0 Paraprofessionals Sub Total 6.0 - GARLAND 1.0 Assist. Principal/Director 1.0 Secretary 0.5 PE Teacher 1.0 In-School Suspension Teacher 1.0 Special Education Teacher 1.0 Para-professional 1.0 Violence Prevention/ Case Manager Mental Health professional- Provided by Rivendell 1.0 Social Worker (Title II) 1.0 Professional Development Facilitator (Title II) 1.0 Security Guard Sub Total 9.5 Total 15.5 ELEMENTARY POSITIONS 2004-2005 JUNE 30, 2004 SCHOOL CONSULTING NET 16 (11 new TEACHERS and 5 splits) *BALE I +I *BASELINE 1 0 *BRADY 1 -1 *CLOVERDALE I -1 *DODD I +l *FAIR PARK I -1 ** *FRANKLIN 1 0 *KING 1 +1 *MABELVALE 1 +l *MITCHELL 1 -2 ** *WAKEFIELD 1 +2 *WASHINGTON 1 +3 *WATSON 1 +I *WILSON 1 0 ** *WOODRUFF I 0 ** titt.y\n, ~J'.~~.. .~. ~j,:':~~~~~ff'~~,'i~'.~~,~~:f *CHICOT +I FOREST PARK +I FULBRIGHT +2 JEFFERSON +l MCDERMOTT +I MEADOW CLIFF -I OTTERCREEK +I RIGHTSELL 0 ** ROCKEFELLER +2 ROMINE +2 STEPHENS -1 TERRY +2 WESTERN HILLS 0 TOTAL 15 16 *** * Schools designated in School Improvement ** Schools with a new position to un-split classes *** The board approved 17 positions. After reviewing the enrollment, 1 position was not utilized. I SCHOOL CENTRAL I FAIR 1, PARKVIEW MSAP SCHOOLS McClellan Fair Cloverdale MS Mabelvale MS MCCLELLAN .. TOTAL SECONDARY POSITIONS JUNE 30, 2004 # of POSITIONS TYPES of POSITIONS 14 Art, +l Fam. Consumer Science, + l Health, +l English, +2.5 Communications, + 1.5 Languages Spanish, + 1.5 Math, +l Science, +2 Social Studies, +2.5 5 Science, +2 Business Educ. + l Math, +l Social Studies, + l 2.5 Science, +l Art, +l English, +.5 Journalism,+ .5 German, -.5 7.4 Lead Teachers, +2.48 Lead Teachers,+ 1.64 Lead Teachers,+ 1.64 Lead Teachers, + 1.64 -5.0 Business-2.0, Drama-1.0, Spanish.5, Science-LO, Social Studies-.5 23.9 ' ' DATE: TO: THROUGH: Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 July 22, 2004 Little Rock School District Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, ED. D., Superintendent of Schools PREPARED BY:~ark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes Financial Reports _!)istrict funds are reported for the period ending June 30, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. _. Population/Location_ _ N/ A  Budget Amount/Source N/ A  Manager  Duration Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District N/ A  Needed Staff NIA -------------- ---  Comments None -------------------------  Recommendation Approval of the June 2Q04_fim_a_nci_al re_p,___orts._ ______ We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2004 UNAUDITED APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 06/30/03 COLLECTED 2003/04 06/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 10, 182,575 127.28% 10,100,000 12,168,056 120.48% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 28,783,688 97.90% 29,600,000 30,306,478 102.39% EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 209,598 112.08% 210,000 199,031 94.78% DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 135,184 75.10% REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 371 ,895 109.38% 380,000 412,550 108.57% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 207,933 75.61% 200,000 202,187 101 .09% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 194,094 121.31% 240,000 195,678 81.53% TOTAL 97,432,000 97,609,310 100.18% 98,607,800 99,506,722 100.91% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 20,836 86.82% 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 20,836 86.82% 21 ,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 53,029,424 96.65% 53,226,139 53,226,139 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 7,940,521 104.62% 8,300,000 7,821 ,385 94.23% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 1,478,190 110.31% 1,400,000 1,229,030 87.79% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 1,662,633 97.80% 1,675,000 1,899,809 113.42% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 273,358 100.00% 273,358 273,358 100.00% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 3,835,562 104.08% 3,875,562 4,019,063 103.70% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 3,684,217 112.84% 3,900,000 4,149,129 106.39% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 1,005,814 99.98% 920,337 914,474 99.36% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 534,979 95.44% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 32,737 27.28% TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 285,245 100.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 334,672 51 .49% 360,000 711 ,853 197.74% TOTAL 75,441,106 74,221,007 98.38% 74,776,187 75,064,464 100.39% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 985,531 87.51% 1,350,000 1,175,000 87.04% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 1,600,140 96.14% 1,632,430 1,643,624 100.69% TOTAL 3,410,671 2,585,671 75.81% 3,752,430 2,818,624 75.11% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 174,436,826 98.94% 177,157,418 177,401,405 100.14% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,152,981 21,830,439 86.79% 24,075,790 21,523,290 89.40% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 3,881,457 97.52% 4,000,000 4,390,381 109.76% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 24,163,584 96.40% 24,689,351 23,837,815 96.55% TOTAL 54,198,923 49,875,480 92.02% 52,765,141 49,751,486 94.29% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 224,312,305 97.31% 229,922,559 227,152,891 98.80% - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2004 UNAUDITED - APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2002/03 06/30/03 EXPENDED 2003/04 06/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,865,586 99,232,348 98.38% 100,684,982 102,304,352 101 .61% BENEFITS 24,838,361 25,391,417 102.23% 26,483,772 26,084,319 98.49% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 20,558,728 103.85% 19,719,297 20,524,209 104.08% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 7,546,057 90.40% 8,185,459 8,598,890 105.05% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 1,248,964 77.24% 1,575,580 1,614,472 102.47% OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 7,903,980 92.89% 8,384,567 8,376,496 99.90% DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,086,131 98.93% 12,098,342 12,063,607 99.71% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176, 189,538 173,967,623 98.74% 177,131,999 179,566,345 101.37% - EXPENSES-OTHER -FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 19,917,300 76.17% 26,056,193 21 ,782,709 83.60% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 3,881,457 97.52% 4,000,000 3,900,916 97.52% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 24,163,584 96.40% 24,689,351 23,837,815 96.55% TOTAL 55,194,668 47,962,341 86.90% 54,745,544 49,521,440 90.46% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 221,929,964 95.91% 231,877,543 229,087,785 98.80% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 2,382,340 (1 ,954,984) (1 ,934,895) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 3,558,580 1,578,177 3,788,627 OPERATING 8,675,891 9,026,855 9,052,274 6,861 ,915 TOTAL 9,325,586 12,585,435 10,630,451 10,650,541 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 06-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 (15,326.00) 17,956.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 15,326.00 14,929.88 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501 .92 0.00 0.00 14,929.88 0.00 95,572.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 114,896.16 4,906.21 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 3,467,037.15 15,993,062.06 6,088,520.49 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 27,732.72 14,541 .25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 9,012.76 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 7,686,775.83 2,887,763.72 7,567,591.92 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31 ,306,506.59 152,200.50 19,087,158.22 12,371,548.87 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 1,007,419.97 1,327,599.27 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 11 ,393,013.48 39,127,045.61 0.00 27,395,564.81 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (7,931,454.48) 14,143,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 1,210,220.06 (3,461 ,559.00) 5,037,437.95 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 1,211,220.06 (11 ,393,013.48) 0.00 0.00 20,925,288.69 GRAND TOTAL I!\n!!\\Z l l!Q l!Z l m 2~Q!i 2.J!l2\nll!HlllZHll lLl!2 !111:tlH.i:~ ~!\\ PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL I PROJECT ALLOCATIONS THRU 06-30-04 673,846.55 38,786,097.95 265,814.17 4,883,405.13 18,920.386.34 I 51 ,641,607.54 1 11,735,611.78 I 15,436,965.72 142,343,735.18 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 THRU 06-30-04 THRU 06-30-04 SUBTOTAL 889,772.32 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 114,896.16 0.00 668,940.34 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 15,993,062.06 0.00 32,697,577.46 113,930.47 109,609.73 27,732.72 0.00 251,272.92 2,641,482.13 1 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 9,012.76 0.00 4,862,548.33 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,887,763.72 I 0.00 11,352,794.42 397,615.34 I 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 19,087,158.22 0.00 39,270,058.67 575,016.53 I 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 1,007,419.97 10,408,012.51 5,852,669.42 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 39,127,045.61 0.00 99,511,204.65 ENDING ALLOCATION 06-30-04 4,906.21 6,088,520.49 14,541 .25 20,856.80 7,567,591 .92 12,371,548.87 1,327,599.27 15,436,965.72 42,832,530.53 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 I I I I I j I Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate 1 Type Principal Date Date I I TFN I Operating 06-25-04 Bank of America 0.790% Repo 2,400,000.00 Operating I 06-25-04 07-12-04 Bank of America 1.090% Treasury Bills 9,000,364.93 I I I Operating 06-01-04 07-02-04 Twin City Bank I 1.860% I CD 4,616,785.99 Operating I 06-30-04 I 07-12-04 I Bank of America 1.120% I Treasury Bills 2,099,216.00 Total 18,116,366.92 I I I t I Payroll 05-14-04 I 07-01-04 I Twin City Bank 1.860% CD I 2,400,000.00 Payroll 05-14-04 I 07-15-04 Twin City Bank 1.860% I CD 2,400,000.00 I Payroll 06-07-04 08-02-04 I Twin City Bank 1.640% CD 1,790,000.00 Payroll 06-17-04 08-16-04 Twin City Bank 1.860% CD 1,790,000.00 t I 8,380,000.00 I I Food Service 06-25-04 07-12-04 Bank of America 1.090% Treasury Bills 1,400,278.87 Food Service 06-30-04 07-12-04 Bank of America 1.120% Treasury Bills 499,813.33 I 1,900,092.20 Activity Fund 06-25-04 07-12-04 Bank of America 1.090% Treasury Bills 929,521.31 Total I 929,521 .31 I 03-08-04 09-06-04 I Bond Account Regions 1.050% CD I 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-14-04 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks I 1.400% I CD 5,231,393.21 ' I Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% I CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund I 05-15-03 08-16-04 USBANK 1.420% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund I 06-10-04 I 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% I Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 06-18-04 08-02-04 Bank of the Ozarks 2.450% CD 9,000,000.00 I i Capital Projects Fund I 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund I 03-15-04 09-15-04 I Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 10,293,800.80 I Capital Projects Fund I 06-25-04 TFN Bank of America 0.790% I Repo 1,500,000.00 Total 48,988,028.94 I ' Deseg Plan Scholarship I 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% I Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total I ' I I 779,103.78 I I I I Rockefeller Scholarship I 06-10-04 i 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total I I 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":9,"next_page":10,"prev_page":8,"total_pages":48,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":96,"total_count":567,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":90},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":73},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":53},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":33},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":6},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":5},{"value":"Office of Education and Lead Planning and Desegregation","hits":5},{"value":"Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"William Gordon Associates","hits":3},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":567},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":561},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":400},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":376},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":351},{"value":"School integration","hits":176},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":174},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":173},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":156},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","hits":144}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":566},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":565},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":555},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":486},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Massachusetts, Middlesex County, Cambridge, Harvard University, 42.377, -71.11666","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":566},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":129},{"value":"1995","hits":120},{"value":"1996","hits":107},{"value":"1993","hits":98},{"value":"1997","hits":93},{"value":"1992","hits":85},{"value":"1998","hits":82},{"value":"1999","hits":81},{"value":"2000","hits":78},{"value":"1991","hits":77},{"value":"2001","hits":72},{"value":"2003","hits":62},{"value":"1990","hits":53},{"value":"2002","hits":53},{"value":"2004","hits":50},{"value":"2005","hits":47},{"value":"1989","hits":39},{"value":"2006","hits":31},{"value":"1988","hits":24},{"value":"2010","hits":21},{"value":"2008","hits":19},{"value":"2009","hits":17},{"value":"2007","hits":15},{"value":"2013","hits":15},{"value":"1986","hits":14},{"value":"2012","hits":14},{"value":"1987","hits":13},{"value":"2011","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"1985","hits":8},{"value":"2014","hits":6},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"1980","hits":4},{"value":"1981","hits":4},{"value":"1982","hits":4},{"value":"1983","hits":4},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"1950","hits":2},{"value":"1951","hits":2},{"value":"1952","hits":2},{"value":"1953","hits":2},{"value":"1954","hits":2},{"value":"1955","hits":2},{"value":"1956","hits":2},{"value":"1957","hits":2},{"value":"1958","hits":2},{"value":"1959","hits":2},{"value":"1960","hits":2},{"value":"1961","hits":2},{"value":"1962","hits":2},{"value":"1963","hits":2},{"value":"1964","hits":2},{"value":"1965","hits":2},{"value":"1966","hits":2},{"value":"1967","hits":2},{"value":"1968","hits":2},{"value":"1969","hits":2},{"value":"1970","hits":2},{"value":"1971","hits":2},{"value":"1972","hits":2},{"value":"2015","hits":1},{"value":"2016","hits":1},{"value":"2017","hits":1},{"value":"2018","hits":1},{"value":"2019","hits":1},{"value":"2020","hits":1},{"value":"2021","hits":1},{"value":"2022","hits":1},{"value":"2023","hits":1},{"value":"2024","hits":1},{"value":"2025","hits":1},{"value":"2026","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2026","count":1641,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":282},{"value":"reports","hits":194},{"value":"filing","hits":49},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":34},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16},{"value":"minutes (administrative records)","hits":16},{"value":"correspondence","hits":3},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"printouts","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":566}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":566},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}