{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_214","title":"Little Rock School District (LRSD) Third Quarter Status Report, Volume I, part 4","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1994-05-13"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District (LRSD) Third Quarter Status Report, Volume I, part 4"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/214"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["162 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLRSD PY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq 12 Page: 1 Revision Date: May 11. 1994 Program Name: In-School Suspension Program Code: n Primary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Program Description: This program provides alternatives to out-of-school suspension which allows students (climate) to continue their education. The Alternative Learning Center (ALC) provides the support (academic, educational, and social) necessary to students so that students can return to their regular school settings and function effectively. The student population at ALC consists of \"at risk\" youngsters, those who are at compulsory attendance age and are experiencing difficulties in school because of poor attendance, or other dysfunctional situations which seriously impede the student's ability to succeed. Students are referred to ALC by their home schools. A screening committee comprised of the junior high principals, and the director of ALC has the task of deciding which students can most benefit from the ALCs services. The ALC serves 7th, Sth, and 9th graders. District Goal Support: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. Program Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan References: L 34, L 30-38 FY Program Budget: $850,408.55 1st Qtr Expend: $70,413.69 3rd Qtr Expend: $206,189.31 FTE 25 YTD Expenditures: $471,756.72 2nd Qtr Expend: $195,153.72 4th Qtr Expend: I Related Function Codes: ] 467LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings.) Plan Reference Page HtaR\u0026gt;er L 30 L 30 L 30 L 30 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date (kapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. To ensure an organizational structure bhich provides equal opportunity and access for parents, students and staff. 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to ensure sufficient support for students and staff success and for the i^\u0026gt;leaantatian of the desegregation plan. A. See staffing school personnel list filed. 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial coanittees to aonitor iapleaantation and data. (Report to faculty) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Chairperson has been chosen. B. Parents have been chosen. 1.2 A district-wide biracial coaaiittee will aamitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) 1.3 Establish a reporting systea. 463 (07/01/93) 07/23/93 07/01/93 07/23/93 07/23/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 (06/30/94) 08/25/93 06/30/94 07/23/93 07/23/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 (Principals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Supt.) Principals, Assistant Sl\u0026lt;}ts. Assoc. Sigrt. of Educational Prograas, Assoc. Si\u0026lt;it. for Desegregation Associate Si4\u0026gt;ts., Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. 1 1 (Sufficient program personnel are in place to meet the needs of all students in the program as aieasured by the monitoring instrument) (Satisfactory conpliance with the Education Equity Monitoring Docunent) 1.1 Survey of staff - patrons 1.1 School-level docuaentation of quarterly aeetings (ainutes, rosters) 1.2 Report of the biracial caaaittee 1.2 (Report from the monitoring of the biracial cormittee to the Board) 1.3 Monitoring reports district-wide biracial coaaitteesPage: 3 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Rane: In-School Suapension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader\nDr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings.) Plan Reference Page Huiber L 30 L 30 1. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coag\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. To provide inservice to raise staff auereness/expectations of equity concerns for students. A. B. C. D. 07/01/95 06/30/94 (Local schools. Staff Development, Communications Dept., Staff Development, Academic Support) 2. Results of school climate survey 2. (Random survey results from Staff Development) Human Relations Inservice Teaching the At-Risk Student You Can Teach Them All Evaluated test scores - (Review of progress reports) 2.1 Inservice cycles for existing and new staff including: A. teacher expectations B. working with parents C. at-risk youth D. learning styles ALTERNATIVE LEARMIMG CENTER E. gang inservice F. emergency intervention 469 08/25/93 08/17/93 08/17/93 10/01/93 07/01/93 03/15/94 08/25/93 08/17/93 08/17/93 75X 75X 03/15/94 Appropriate AMociate Sigrts.f and Staff Development 2.1 Roeter of teachers/part i c i pat i ng staff Data-basad i^iroveBRnt in targeted student schools 2.1 (Evaluation of inservice segments by participants)Page: 4 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revisicxi Data: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suapenaian Prograa Code: n Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities For students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings.) Plan Reference Page Hiaber L 30 L 30 1. (cont*d) Objectives Strategies 3. To provide prograam trfiich raise parental awareness of district structure, policy, and programs and ways to access them. 3. (Programs which demonstrate high quality of parent involvement) 3.1 Mini-seminars at PTA meetings and in the coamwiity. 3.1 (Evidence of quality programs presented to parents.) ALTERHATIVE LEARNIWG CEWTER A. Student Intake with Parental Involvement B. Media (Launch of Aquaculture Project) Beginning Date 07/01/93 (07/01/93) 07/01/93 Caiq\u0026gt;letion Date 06/30/94 (75X) 06/30/94 Responsibility (Coninun i ca t i ons Dept., Staff Development, and Academic Support) District staff PTA Council (local and area) Evaluation Criteria 3. Roster of attendance 3.1 Calendar showing programs held 3.1 (Calendar showing roster of participants and evaluation form) 3.1 (Evidence of parent participation\nincrease in number of parents involved in school activities including VIPS, PTA, Parent Forums\nend increase in student achievement data\nand increase in number of students above the NCE on Stanford 8 and Abacus) 4 10Page: 5 Progrm Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Primry Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings.) Plan Reference Page Niaber L 30 L 30 1. (contd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaipletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Media (Radio Program with staff interviews regarding school programs) 4. To monitor school standards to ensure hi^ quality education for all students. 4.1 4.1 A. 07/01/93 75X Review data (List data, achievement, discipline, promotion, retention, increase or decrease of white students, mjnber above and below state reference point to assess strengths, needs, and strategies.) Review grade distribution, ribbon and trophy awards. ALTERNATIVE LEARN IMG CENTER B. 4.2 07/01/93 02/24/94 75X 02/24/94 Enlist New Futures Intervention team from Hoover. 1. Reading Specialist 2. Hath Specialist School Bonitoring visits 471 02/24/94 07/01/93 02/24/94 75X Associate Sipt., Principals, Assistant Starts. Planning, Research, and Evaluation 4.1 Calendars of visits 4.1 (Staff, facilities, climate, administration, organization, and achievement levels) 4.1 Fewer incidents of disruptive behavior. 4.2 Monitoring reports 4.2 (Staff Climate Survey)__________________LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 6 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Haaa: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuriier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 31 2. To provide a climate in each school which is based on the belief and expectation that all children can learn and to provide resources necessary to s(\u0026lt;]port that belief. (Principals, Teachers, Assistant Supts.) 1. Provide education to staff and patrons regarding school culture and positive school climate. 07/01/93 06/30/94 1. Utilization of the school climate survey 1. (Results of school climate survey report) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. You Can Teach Them All 09/14/93 75X B. Teaching The At-Risk Student C. Human Relations D. News and Radio publication, E. Counseling with school nurse F. Counseling with professionals conpliments of Professional Counseling Associates G. Counseling with New Futures Case Managers. L 31 2. (To work with teachers and principals to develop a positive school climate) 1.1 PTA Board and general meetings to have educational cosfionents regarding climate and expectations. 07/01/93 06/30/94 1.1 (LRSD expectations, teacher- designed instrument, clarify what kind of expectations'-achievement, behavior, attendance) 472 District personnel as desivwted by the Associate Si\u0026lt;t. 1.1 Agendas of aeetings Measurable iiqx*oveaents in individual school climates (1.1 Agendas of meetings and evidence of results of school climate survey report)Prograa Saq *: 12 Prograa Naae: Prograa Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Himber L 31 L 31 L 31 L 31 Page: 7 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 In*School Suspension 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison To provide ecfuitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. 2. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coafiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.2 Use of cable Channel 4 to carry brief isessages to staff regarding expectations, working with at-risk and disadvantaged students, and creating positive climate. 1.2 (Clarify performnce expectations, such as behavior emphasis on students falling below) 2. Monitor school climate and resource allocation. 2. (Review of annual school plan) 2.1 Monitor facility, staff morale, student achievement, status of media center books, and materials. ALTERHATIVE LEARWINS CEWTER A. B. C. 0. E. 2.1 2.2 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 75X Progress Reports (Quarterly) Staff meeting and evaluations for assessment of progress and morale (weekly) Staff birthday recognitions with pot luck lunches Female student fashion show with parental attendance Male student talent show with parental attendance (Assess staff morale, student achievement, etc.) Enhance equipaent, si^iplies, and materials in buildings. 473 08/23/93 01/01/94 08/23/93 07/01/93 75X 01/01/94 08/23/93 06/30/94 (Principals, Teachers, Staff Development, Communications Office) Assistant Si^s., Principals, Media Supervisor Assistant Supts., Principals, Media Stpervisor 1.2 (Assessing performance of the school principal) 2.1 Reports of Si^iervisors, Assistant Si^s. 2.2 (Improvement in the climate and environment and kinds of materials that are available)Page: 8 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudaer L 31 L 31 2. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.2 (Provide resources) ALTERNATIVE LEARWIMG CENTER A. B. C. 2.3 2.3 Repeated Work Orders Frequent requests to appropriate support service Installed (1) Science Table Provide staff developsant and intervention plans as needed. (To provide staff development to aieet the instructional needs of principals, teachers, and all levels of staff) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. B. 08/23/93 08/23/93 07/01/93 25X 25X 06/30/94 (Curriculum Supervisors) Assistant Supts., Principals, Media Supervisor, Identified District Staff 2.3 Staff Developamnt rosters 2.3 (Kinds of staff development programs developed for needs) 2.3 Quality of education survey results Project Wild (across the curriculum) PACE Training 3. To work with schools to help them design prograam Uiich aeet the specific needs of their stuxlents. 3. (Assist teachers and principals in the development of individual programs which address learning needs of students) 474 08/17/93 09/27/93 (07/01/93) 08/17/93 09/27/93 06/30/94 (Staff Development) (Associate Supt., Assistant Supts., Curriculum Supvs., Staff Development) 3. (Evidence of implementation of Desegregation Plan and School Improvement Plan)Page: 9 ProgpM Seq *: 12 Reviaion Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naoe: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntatier L 31 L 31 L 31 L 32 2. (cont*d) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.1 Provide resource assistance to school staffs. 3.1 (Provide resources, both hunan and financial, to teachers and principals in the development of educational programs) ALTERMATIVE LEARMIWG CENTER A. 6. 3.2 A. B. 3.3 Educational Prograas (Associate Supt., Principals) 3.1 Coas\u0026gt;letion of prograa design Networking to develop Project Wild and Horticulture Project - Game and Fish Connission Provided School Health Fair with local health care providers. Provide planning time and fonaats to school staffs) Planning time provided by master schedule Schedule modified to add activity schedule Develop school profiles which show coaplete data pictures. Set goals for i^N-oveaant. School Profile information entered on hard copy until district computer network is functional. 4. Establish a program to familiarize parents with school expectations and to build a partnership with them. Parent/student orientation student's entry. 09/23/93 01/04/94 07/01/93 01/04/94 07/01/93 08/30/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 03/09/94 75X SOX 75X 75X 08/30/93 75X 08/23/93 03/09/94 Associate Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;t. for Educational Prograam, Principals, School Principals and Staffs (Planning, Research, and Evaluation\nData Processing) (Asst. Supts., Principals, Media Supv.) 3.2 School profiles and annitored building plans 3.3 (Completed document)Psge: 10 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2. 1994 Prograa Haae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Psge Hudier L 32 2. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Dste Coiq\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.1 Share schools* objectives, discipline policy, standards for testing, placing, and promoting students. 07/01/93 75X Principals, Staffs 4.1 Dcvelopaent of and sharing of school-based objectives, discipline policies, etc. ALTERNATIVE LEARNIWG CENTER A. Part of orientation. 08/23/93 09/30/93 B. Parental conferences during intake, and during behavior nxxiification procedure 08/23/93 75X 4.1 (At the beginning of school, do an annual school letter that shares policies and objectives) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. School newspaper records school activities with regard to awards and special achievements (monthly). L 32 4.2 Involve parents as full partners in planning at schools for students' growth and success. 07/01/93 75X Principals, Staff, PTA Board, Patrons 4.2 Statistical i^irovcaent in student belMvior and achieveaKnt ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Part of orientation. 12/15/93 12/15/93 B. Provide opportunities for parents as resource speakers. 08/23/93 10/26/93 C. Involve parents as participants on school bi-racial convnittee. 0. Involve parents in Chapter I reading conferences. E. Parents are invited to visit at any time 08/23/93 75X 47GPage: 11 Prograa Seq *: 12 Reviaion Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naaa: In*SchooI Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mia*jer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria F. Send parent letters regarding emergency procedures, special programs 08/23/93 75X J 477LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 12 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Program Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mudr L 33 L 33 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. To develop and implcarnnt policies which influence school climate and i^\u0026gt;rove discipline and student attendant Uiile also meeting individual student needs and learning styles. 3. (Design and put into place programs which improve school climate and improve discipline and student attendance while also meeting individual student needs and learning styles) 1. 1. Provide inservice training to district personnel on discipline in a desegregated setting. (Focus on how to use techniques that foster positive student behavior in a desegregated setting) A. B. C. (07/01/93) (06/30/94) Master Teacher Series - You Can Teach Them All Reinforcement - each staff meeting. Review district and school handbook. 1.1 Conduct inservice training on discipline management in all local schools. A. Maintenance in regular staff meetings. 478 08/17/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 08/17/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 (Principals, Parents, Staff Development, Student Hearing Officer) Director of Pupil Services, BuiIding Principals, Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. 1, 1. (Comparative data annual school report for student attendance and student management quarterly reports) (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Rosters of meetings)Page: 13 Prograa Seq *: 12 Reviaion Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograai Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader\nOthello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaipletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 1.1 (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management in all local schools). A. Provide Hentor teacher for new teachers. 1.2 Provide follow-up training for new staff on a regular basis. 1.2 Provide ongoing training for all staff in working with at risk students. (07/01/93) 08/23/93 07/01/93 01/04/94 L 33 2. Provide inservice to district personnel on behavioral styles and learning styles of students with divergent backgromds. 2. (Conduct inservice on an ongoing basis on positive discipline management in all local schools) (07/01/93) (06/30/94) 08/23/93 06/30/94 75X (06/30/94) (Student Hearing Officer) BuiIding Principals, Director of Pi\u0026lt;\u0026gt;il Services (Director of Pupil Services, BuiIding Principals, Asst. Supts., Student Hearing Officer) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that wilt reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.2 (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) 1.1 (Quarterly discipline management reports that will reflect a decrease in behavior referrals and suspensions) A. Utilize school personnel trained in cooperative discipline for mini training sessions. B. Provide for school personnel mini training sessions learning styles (True colors learning styles). 472Page: 14 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: May 2. 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable echjcational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 33 3. (cont'd) 2.1 Provide training for scfwol-based iiqM*oveaent teams (to involve staff and parents ibo will train staff at the school site with annual aaintenance). 2.1 (Provide ongoing training for staff to foster positive student behavior) ALTERHATIVE lEARMIHG CEWTER A. B. C. D. 07/01/93 06/30/94 Associate Stpts., Staff Oevelopaent, Identified Staff (Principals, Teachers, Hearing Officer, Data Processing) 2.1 (Quarterly reports should include positive as well as negative reports which show an increase in the citizenship honor roll in elementary schools. Should show an increase in the nunber of students that acquire \"1's\" and \"2's\" in citizenship at the secondary level) Provide incentive program, ALCAGO * Alternative Learning Center Academic Growth Opportunity. Consensus building session with students \"Uhat Students Wish Teachers Knew\" and \"What Teachers Wish Students Knew\" Intervention group sessions with girls. Group sessions with boys. Develop methods to fund incentive program. 3. Provide a coaaiittee to review attendance and discipline policies and data on an ongoing bMis to ensure equity of policy and policy adainistration. 480 08/23/93 01/01/94 (07/01/93) 75X 75X (06/30/94) (Principals, Teachers, Student Hearing Officer) 3. (Final report of the quarterly reviews)Page: 15 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niater L 33 L 33 3. (cont'd) (X\u0026gt;jectives Strategies Beginning Date Caof\u0026gt;letian Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (Each school is to establish a convnittee to conduct quarterly reviews of attendance and discipline data to assess compliance with the goal of equitable policy and policy acbninistration. Conduct and report results of quarterly reviews.) ALTERNATIVE LEARMIMG CENTER A. Secured services of professional mental health person (weekly). Person completed internship and 07/01/93 09/30/93 left. New Futures Case Managers. 3.1 Coamiittee and scRxamaittee to include principals, staff, patrons, students (on the secondary level) arwt at least one (1) Board meat er to review data and rccoswnd modifications to meet students' needs and district needs. 3.1 (Establish a district-wide conmittee to review the local school committee reports which should include attendance, discipline data interventions by race and gender. The district- wide committee will report the results of the review to the Associate Supt. of Desegregation.) 3.2 Revise student handbooks as needed A. Updated 92-93 Handbook 07/01/93 07/01/93 09/16/93 481 06/30/94 06/30/94 09/16/93 Associate Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts., Principals, Teachers, Director of Pi^il Services (Hearing Officer, Desegregation Facilitator) (Principals, Teachers) 3.1 (Formal report identifying results of analysis of data received from local school connittees about level of compliance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.2 (Student handbooks reflect compliance with current district attendance and discipline policies)Page: 16 Prograai Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: !n-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudwr Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 3.2 (Update student handbooks annually to ensure continued compliance with district attendance and discipline policies) 3.3 The student hearing officer will be responsible for developing and monitoring plans to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions. 07/01/93 06/30/94 (Asst. Supts., Teachers, Parents, Principals, Student Hearing Officer) 3.3 (Analysis of quarterly reports in chart form to determine decrease in reported discipline sanctions) 3.3 (Use evidence of district-wide reports to provide guidance to local schools in formatting plans to reduce disparity of disciplinary actions) Senior High Schools A. One high school reported using the tn* School Suspension Program for guidance. 01/03/94 03/31/94 Area Junior Nigh Schools A. Four area junior high schools docunented the use of district'Wide reports to provide guidance. Ex: Reviewed Quarterly Discipline Report 01/03/94 03/31/94 Junior High Magnet Schools A. Both magnet junior high schools reported using district-wide reports for guidance. Elementary Area Schools 01/03/94 03/31/94 A. Twenty-one area schools report using district-wide reports to provide guidance in formatting plans to reduce disparity of disciplinary actions. 01/03/94 03/31/94 Elementary Magnet Schools 48^Page: 17 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Masa: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niaber L 33 L 34 3. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Five Elementary Magnet Schools report using district-wide reports to provide guidance in formatting plans to reduce disparity of disciplinary actions. Elementary Interdistrict Schools A. Both schools report having a connittee to review information and to submit quarterly reports. 4. 4. 5. 01/03/94 01/03/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 Appoint joint coaHittee with PCSSO and NLRSO. (. . .to establish a uniform attendance and discipline policy.) 4.1 Review attendance and disciplinary policies and consequences. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Parent and student must sign contract regarding student behavior upon entry. Weekly (Monday) reinforcement. Put in place alternatives to suspension across the district with at least one such intervention to be placed at each school. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Leveled Discipline Plans (Level I, Level II, Level III) B. Intervention vis Delta Services Team 07/01/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 483 06/30/94 06/30/94 75X 06/30/94 75X 75X (Associate Supt. for Desegregation) Associate Sifjts., appointed staff three school districts (use Tri-Oistrict Coaponent) (Principals, staff, Asst. Supts.) 4. 5. (Evidence of a uniform discipline policy) 4.1 Review and revision of Tri-Oistrict attendance and disciplinary policies (Review of suspensions report to determine decrease in out-ofschool suspensions at individual schools)Page: 18 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-SchooI Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) C. Intervention via parents, pastors, case workers SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of six high schools identified alternative programs to suspension. B. One of six high schools reported activities in a program designed to reduce suspensions as an alternative to suspension. C. One high school identified an alternative program to suspension. AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Five of the six area junior high schools indicated the use of alternatives to suspensions. B. Two of the six area junior high schools reported the establishment and use of alternatives to suspension. Examples: Detention hall\npeer helpers C. Four junior high schools docunented the placement of alternatives to suspension. Ex: Gentlemen's Club JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET SCHOOLS A. Both magnet schools reported alternative programs to suspension. 08/23/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 75X 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 484Page: 19 ProgroH Seq #: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograai Naae: !n-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuiber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CoHfiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) B. Both magnet schools have in place alternatives to suspension. Examples: Saturday D-Hall and inschool suspension. C. Both magnet junior high schools identified alternative programs to suspension. ELEMEMTARY AREA MAGWET SCHOOLS A. The schools have programs in place. ELEMEMTARY IMTEROISTRICT MASWET SCHOOLS A. Both schools are not reporting interventions this quarter. B. One of the schools reported supplying behavior document reports for certified staff use. One school reported having a discipline plan revision committee. INCENTIVE SCHOOLS A. Five schools have at least one intervention in place as an alternative to suspension. Example: an in-school suspension strategy, role model mentors, counselor interventions ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Twelve schools report having in place alternatives to suspensions. B. Five area schools report having alternatives to suspensions. 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 08/24/93 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 10/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 09/30/93 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 485Page: 20 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goel: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudser L 34 3. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date (Zoiqpletion Date Responsibility evaluation Criteria 5.1 Develop school-based discipline plans to be reviewed at district level and to include suspension alternatives. ALTERNATIVE LEARMIMG CENTER A. Individual Student Contracts B. Institute program for grouping. study carrel, parent conferences, etc. C. Provide for small group, round table, and mentor counseling. SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of six high schools reported completing the development of discipline management plans. B. Two high schools reported the continued development and review of discipline management plans. AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of the six area junior high schools have developed schoolbased discipline plans. B. One of the six area junior high schools has developed school-based discipline plans which include suspension alternatives. C. Three area junior high schools documented evidence of school-based discipline plans, detention hall Ex: Noon'time JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET SCHOOLS 07/01/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 08/24/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 436 06/30/94 75X 75X 75X 09/30/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 10/31/93 03/31/94 Assistant Sipts., Principals, School-based staffs 5.1 (Submission to Asst. Supts. of school plans that identify alternatives to out-of- school suspensions)Page: 21 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-SchooI Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader\nOthello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Minfeer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) A. One magnet junior high school reported completing the development of discipline management plans. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Both magnet junior high schools have developed school-based discipline plans which include suspension alternatives. 10/01/93 10/31/93 C. Both magnet junior high schools reported the coepletion of the development and maintenance of discipline management. 01/03/94 03/31/94 ELEHEHTARY AREA HAGMET SCHOOLS A. Plan in place at two schools. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Two magnet schools report having developed school-based discipline plan. 10/01/93 12/31/93 C. Elementary magnet schools have developed school-based discipline plans which include suspension alternatives and reviewed by the assistant superintendent. 01/03/94 03/31/94 ELEHEHTARY INTERDISTRICT HAGMET SCHOOLS A. Both schools report having implemented a positive discipline plan. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. One school reports including positive discipline practices in everyday learning situations. One school reports the use of their Discipline Plan Revision Comnittee. 10/01/93 12/31/93 C. Both schools report having plans which include suspension alternatives and reviewed by the assistant superintendent. 01/03/94 03/31/94 437Page: 22 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niaber L 34 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) INCENTIVE SCHOOLS A. Five incentive schools submitted annual school plans addressing suspension alternatives. ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. B. 08/24/93 09/30/93 Nine schools report having school- based discipline committees in place. Five area schools report including positive discipline practices in everyday learning situations. Two area schools reported that their discipline committees were charged with the responsibility of finding alternatives to suspension. C. Twenty-one elementary area schools have developed school-based discipline plans which include suspension alternatives and reviewed by the assistant superintendent. 5.2 Effectiveness of these alternatives to be regularly assessed. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Student Progress Reports (Quarterly) 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 07/01/93 08/23/93 438 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 75X 75X (Principals^ Staffs, Schoolbased Conmittees, Assistant Supts., Hearing Officer) 5.2 Existence of alternative plan in each building 5.2. (Submission to Asst. Supts. of school plans that identify alternatives to out-ofschool suspensions\nevidence of decrease in out-of-school suspensions)Page: 23 Progrea Seq *: 12 Revision Dste: May 2, 1994 Prograa Haae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) B. Increase in Level 111 participation (Quarterly) 08/25/93 09/30/93 C. Quarterly review of students via interviews, counseling, reports. 08/25/93 75X D. Review by placement team. SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. One high school reported conducting regular meetings to review discipline alternatives. B. One of the six high schools reported assessment activities relating to alternatives to suspension during the second quarter. C. Five high schools reported conducting meetings regularly to assess discipline alternatives. AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Two of the six schools reported reviewing end assessing the effectiveness of alternatives. C. B. Two of the six area junior high schools documented that alternatives to suspensions are regularly assessed for effectiveness. Example: Adninistrative Team Three area junior high schools employed techniques for assessing the effectiveness of suspension alternatives. Ex: Adninistrative meetings both district and in-house. JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET SCHOOLS 08/25/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 489 75X 09/30/93 10/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94Prograa Seq *: Prograa Naae: Prograa Code: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Nuiber Page: 24 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 In*School Suspension 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) A. One school indicated monitoring was done through discipline quarterly reports. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Both magnet junior high schools assess regularly their alternatives to suspensions. 10/01/93 12/31/93 Examples: B.C.C. meetings and Quarterly Discipline Report C. Both magnet junior high schools reportedly reviewed and assessed the effectiveness of alternatives. ELEMENTARY INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS A. Both schools report having distributed to their staffs positive alternatives to suspension. B. Both schools report the distribution of positive alternatives to suspension to their staffs. INCENTIVE SCHOOLS A. Two schools reported having the committee address effectiveness quarterly. ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Five schools report having distributed to their staff positive alternatives to suspensions. B. Twelve area schools report having distributed positive alternatives to suspension to their staffs. 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 430 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93Page: 25 Progr Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Mane: !n-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader\nDr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal\nTo provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nud9er L 34 L 34 3. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coiiif\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Twenty elementary area schools reports assessing the effectiveness of alternatives to suspensions regularly. Elementary Magnet Schools A. Five elementary magnet schools reports assessing the effectiveness of alternatives to suspensions regularly. Elementary Interdistrict Schools A. Both elementary interdistrict schools reports assessing the effectiveness of alternatives to suspension regularly. 6. Establish a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive system at each school. ALTERNATIVE LEARMIWG CEMTER A. Incentive program in place 6. (. . .as part of the annual school plan which should result in improved attendance and a decrease in disciplinary sanctions.) ALTERMATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Weekly Attitude Rewards 8. Weekly Behavior Rewards C. Weekly Academic Rewards SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of the six schools reported having discipline/attendance incentive programs. 01/03/94 01/03/94 01/03/94 07/01/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 08/24/93 491 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 07/01/93 75X 75X 75X 09/30/93 (Principals, Staffs, School* based Convnittees 6. (Submission of annual school reports to the Asst. Supts. will give evidence of improvement and a decrease in the attendance and disciplinary sanctions)Page: 26 Progran Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: ln*School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Miafcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 8. One of the six high schools reported activities related to an incentive program during the second quarter. C. Two high schools reported the existence of a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive program. Ex: Implementation of Portfolio Assessment Program. AREA JUmOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Four of the six junior high schools have established incentive programs to improve student discipline and attendance. C. 8. One of the six junior high schools has reportedly established disciplinary and attendance incentive systems. Two area junior high schools documented evidence of the establishment of a school'based student discipline and attendance incentive system. Ex: Breakfast of Champions JUNIOR HIGH MAGHET SCHOOLS A. One of the two junior high magnet schools reported having discipline/attendance incentive programs. C. 8. Both of the junior high magnet schools have established discipline and attendance incentive systems. Example: Awards Assemblies Both magnet junior highs have established and use a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive system. Ex: Incentive Day 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 49 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 9Page: 27 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Dste: Kay 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mmfeer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) ELEMENTARY AREA MAGNET SCHOOLS A. All elementary magnet schools have programs in place. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. One magnet school reported having established a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive system. C. All elementary magnet schools have established a school-based incentive system for student discipline and attendance. ELEMENTARY INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS A. One school reports that they examine student records associated with discipline and attendance. One school reports that awards assemblies are ongoing. B. Both schools have established a school-based incentive system for student discipline and attendance. ELEMENTARY INCENTIVE SCHOOLS A. One school reports school-based committee to visit homes. ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Twelve area schools report having established a school-based student discipline and attendance incentive system. B. Twenty elementary area schools have established a school-based incentive system for student discipline and attendance. 10/01/93 01/03/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 493Page: 28 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-SchooL Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nudtter Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf}letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) 6.1 Review research and develop rewards prograai so that recognition and incentives will be individual to the school. 07/01/93 06/30/94 Principals/ Staff, Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts., VIPS, Patrons 6.1 Statistical data to stfiport validity of plan and iafrovearnnt in discipline and behavior 6.1 (The research will be reviewed annually to determine revision needs of school incentive systems) 6.1 (Submission of annual school reports to the Asst. Supts. wi11 show an improvement in discipline and behavior) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. ALCAGO Cards (Incentives) 08/23/93 75X B. Weekly Videotaped Rewards Program 09/09/93 75X C. Planning for 9th Grade Graduation Ceremony 09/20/93 75X 0. Continue Student of the Week recognition. 08/26/93 75X E. Continue ALCAGO point award. 08/23/93 75X F. Living History assenbly featuring Mrs. Edith McClinton, a handicapable senior citizen 03/10/94 03/10/94 G. Crafts sessions H. Group counseling with New Futures Intervention team I. Continuation of radio program SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of the six high schools reported activities related to the development of incentive activities during the second quarter. 10/01/93 12/31/93 434Page: 29 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal\nTo provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) B. Four high schools reported the development of a rewards program. AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of six junior high schools reported the development of rewards and incentives. Examples: Student of the Week, Instruction Awards, Assistant Principal Recognition. B. One of the six junior high schools cited relative incentive strategies for their schools. C. Three area junior high schools reported the development of a rewards program. JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET SCHOOLS A. One of the two junior high magnet schools cited the recognition of outstanding student leaders as a relative incentive strategy for that individual school. B. Both magnet junior high schools reported the continued development and use of rewards and incentives for the third quarter. Ex: Student Recognition Day ELEMENTARY AREA MAGNET SCHOOLS A. Data reviewed at three schools. 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 493Page: 30 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-SchooI Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntwfcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coafiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) B. Three schools report having reached and developed reward programs for recognition and incentives unique to their schools. 10/01/93 12/31/93 C. AU schools report reviewing the literature and developing reward and incentive programs which are individual to the school. ELEMENTARY IMTEROISTRICT MAGMET SCHOOLS A. Both schools report recognition programs individual to their schools B. Both schools report using credible reward programs for the purpose of student motivation and achievement. C. Both schools report reviewing the literature and developing reward and incentive programs which are individual to the school. ELEMENTARY IMCEMTIVE SCHOOLS A. Three incentive schools reported a plan for incentives. ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Eleven schools have established reward/incentive programs for the individual school. 6. Nine area schools report having reached and developed reward programs for recognition and incentives unique to their schools. 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 496Page: 31 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograai Maaa: In-SchooL Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Muifcer L 34 Objectives Strategies Begiming Date CcM^letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) C. Twenty-three schools report reviewing the literature and developing reward and incentive programs which are individual to the school. 7. Provide cocrweling intervention for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance probleas. ALTERNATIVE LEARMIMG CENTER A. Group Counseling provided by Delta Services Team B. Planning for Health Fair (to be held in Deceni\u0026gt;er for Ist semester) C. Planning for Career Day (to be held in the Spring) 0. Planning for Field Day (to be held in May) E. Peer Counseling Program F. Weekly Stress Management Instruction SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Three of the six high schools reported the establishment of student assistance programs. B. Two of the six schools reported providing counseling interventions for students with chronic problems during the second quarter. 01/03/94 07/01/93 08/23/93 09/03/93 09/10/93 09/17/93 09/03/93 09/02/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 437 03/31/94 06/30/94 75X 75X 75X 25X 75X 75X 09/30/93 12/31/93 (Pupil Services Team, Counselors, Parents) 7. (Review of discipline and attendance records will show a decrease in chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems)Page: 32 Prograai Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2. 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mmfeer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) C. Two high schools reported the provision of counseling intervention. Step-up Center Ex: 01/03/94 03/31/94 AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Two of the six schools utilize Case Management Service Teams, Alternative Learning Center and the Student Assistance Team. 06/24/93 09/30/93 B. Two of the six schools reported that counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems were provided. Examples: New Futures and Pi|}il Services Team. 10/01/93 12/31/93 C. For the third quarter, three area junior high schools reported the provision of counseling intervention for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET SCHOOLS A. Both junior high magnet schools provide counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. Example: Student Assistance Program B. Both schools provide counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. Example: Student Assistance Program 01/03/94 10/01/93 10/01/93 498 03/31/94 12/31/93 12/31/93Page: 33 Prograai Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Program Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) C. Counseling intervention for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems was provided the third quarter. Ex: Student Assistance Program 01/03/94 03/31/94 ELEMENTARY IHTERDISTRICT HAGMET SCHOOLS A. One school reports counselor intervention for students in need. 10/01/93 12/31/93 8. Both schools reports providing counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. 01/03/94 03/31/94 ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Three area schools report providing counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. 10/01/93 12/31/93 B. Twenty-two schools reports providing counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. Elementary Magnet Schools A. All magnet schools reports providing counseling interventions for students with chronic disciplinary and/or attendance problems. 7.1 Activate discipline/attendance intervention teams at school. Mandate the piR\u0026gt;il services team to do monitoring and involve the counselor with students who have discipline/attendance problems. 01/03/94 01/03/94 07/01/93 499 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 Principals, Guidance Departments, BuiIding Staffs, School Health Services Coordinator 7.1 Records of comseling intervention 7.1 (Review of discipline and attendance records wilt show a decrease in the chronic discipline and/or attendance proislems) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTERPage: 34 Progm Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Progri Maae: In-SchooI Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) A. Teachers call parents of absent students daily. SEMIOR HIGH SCHOOLS A. Four of the six high schools reported attendance and/or discipline interventions or intervention programs in activity during the second quarter. B. Three high schools utilize periodic counselor/service team meetings. AREA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Four of the six junior high schools utilize periodic counselor/service team meetings. B. Three of the six junior high schools documented the activation of discipline/attendance intervention teams at school. C. Two area junior high schools docunented activities related to discipline/attendance teams. Ex: Use of Steering Committee in monitoring student discipline/attendance JUNIOR HIGH MAGMET SCHOOLS A. One of the two junior high magnet schools report the activation of the Pupil Services Team B. Both magnet junior high schools actively use discipline/attendance intervention teams at school. Ex: SAP Teams and ETM Teams meet and monitor students. 01/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 50 0 75X 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 35 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Haae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntsiter Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. (cont'd) ELEMENTARY AREA HAGWET SCHOOLS A. Teams activated at four schools. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. One school reports having active discipline/attendance teams. C. All magnet schools reports having active discipline/attendance school intervention teams. ELEMENTARY IMTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS A. Both schools employ counseling intervention strategies and involve the Pc^iI Services team on a regular basis. 8. One school reports utilizing building specialists and others to develop appropriate strategies and alternative interventions. C. Both schools reports having active discipline/attendance school intervention teams. INCENTIVE SCHOOLS A. Three incentive schools report having the pupil services team activated to meet with teachers as needed. ELEMENTARY AREA SCHOOLS A. Eleven schools have established discipline/attendance intervention school teams. B. Ten schools report having active discipline/attendance teams. 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 501 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93Page: 36 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nurter L 34 3. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Twenty-one schools reports having active discipline/attendance school intervention teams. 7.2 Involve parents In the teaa process regarding their children throu^ aeetlngs/conferences. 7.2 (. . .about identified attendance and/or disciplinary problems) A. Parental participation documented in Progress Report (Quarterly) 01/03/94 07/01/93 09/02/93 502 03/31/94 06/30/94 75X Principals, Parents, PTA Officers, PTA Cornell, Comselors, Pi\u0026lt;\u0026gt;il Services Teaas, School Health Services 7.2 Records of perents/teaa involveaent 7.2 (. . . will show an increase in the number of parents participating in the team process)LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 37 Prograa Seq *: 12 Reviaion Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 35 4. To provide guidance and comseling service which address students* needs, are st\u0026lt;]portive of strategies and interventions to enhance student success and expectations, and provide cooBssiications to faaiilies of students. 07/01/93 06/30/94 Cotnselors, Principals (Pupil Services Teachers, Parents, Teachers) 1. Guidance services, Arvual Report, and Report Cciqiarison 1. (Reports will show all students needing services will receive them) 1. Infora students of all opportwities available to thea and encourage thea to take advantage of these opportwities. 07/01/93 06/30/94 1. (Identify academic, emotional, social, and physical needs of students.) A. Counselor/nurse/mental health professional 1 (Identify needs of students (elementary) 1. (Secure the needed services utilizing district and community-based resources) B. Networking with business and mental health, and educational convnunities. 07/01/93 75X L 35 1.1 PiA\u0026gt;l1sh a doctaaent annually ahich lists financial aid, vocational and higher education opportmities for all studerrts. 07/01/93 75X Principals, Counselors, Vocational Director (Teachers, Parents) 1.1 (Make available) document(s). 503 1.1 Piiilications of doctaent 1.1 (Disseminate document to students and parents)Page: Prograa Seq *: 12 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Umber L 35 (L 35) L 35 L 35 3S Revision Date: Othello Faison Hay 2, 1994 To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. 4. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.2 Encourage students to take advantage of opportiaiities open to them. 1.3 (Follow up to ensure that referral was appropriate intervention to enhance student success and expectations) 2. Hake parents partners in education of their children by anking information accessible to them and keeping them inforsmd. A. B. 2.1 2.1 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 06/30/94 Hail information regarding school activities. Call parents. Hold a cosHStity educational meeting each year during the spring to inform parents of curricului and student opportunities (to include co- curricular activities) (Identify courses and activities available which will help prepare students for post secondary education and career preparation) 07/01/93 504 06/30/94 (Principals, Teachers, Parents, Students) (Principals, Teachers, Parents (Principals, Teachers, Parents) Principals, Counselors, Director of Guidance, Associate and Assistant Si4\u0026gt;ts. 1.2 Statistical increase in nudier of students, particularly minority students, receiving financial aid and proceeding into post secondary education (1.3 Docunentation will show referrals were appropriate) 2. (Reports will reflect an increase in the number of parents involved as partners in the education of their children) 2.1 Roster of aaetings (2.1 Number of students who graduate and elect advanced training/ education by race and gender)Prograa Seq *: 12 Progrea Naae: In*School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson V Page: 39 Revision Date: Mey 2, 1994 Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuiber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 35 4. (cont'd) A. B. C. Send home monthly newsletter Mail school designed progress reports (Sth week of each 9 week period) Telephone parents to advise special student progress/awards/ pre*suspension conference. 2.2 Provide written information to parents regarding curriculua and student skills. A. Prepare quarterly interim reports. S. Prepare and distribute informative brochures. C. Prepare and maiI report cards quarterly. 3. To make students aware of educational and post educational opportunities 08/30/93 09/25/93 08/30/93 75X 75X 75X (Counselors, Principals, Teachers, Vocational Director, Parents) (2.1 Report will show the targeted number of students who will enroll in upper*level classes and elect to attend post secondary education) 3. Disseminate documents to students and parents A. Make students aware of summer employment opportunities and sunner educational enrichment opportunities. 505Page: 40 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Haaa: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Number L 35 L 35 4. (cont'd) 4. (cant'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.1 A. 3.1 Skills and eaT\u0026gt;loyaent fair to be held annually in conjunction with business coaauiity. Planning for Health Fair (to be held in Dec. for let semester) (. . .and College Night) ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Add GED Program project of Delta Service Corps 4. Create coaawity linkages to assist students in need of special services. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Secure volunteers from Delta Service Corps to work in the program. 506 07/01/93 09/03/93 01/04/94 07/01/93 08/23/93 75X 12/07/93 75X 75X 08/23/93 Vocational Teachers, Comselors, VolKiteers in Schools, PTA (Director of Pupil Services) (Counselors, Principals, Pupil Services Team (Elem), Parents) 3.1 EB|\u0026gt;loyaent Fair Student Attendance 3.1 (Participation rates of parents and students in the LRSD attending the employment fair and Collie Night will be conpiled and compared with previous attendance rates) 4. Report will reflect the nunber of conmunity linkages and their ability to meet the needs of targeted studentsPsge: 41 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: Hay 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mudier L 35 L 35 4. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.1 A. B. Through Ford Collaborative, Neu Futures Initiation, city, courts, ptiilic, and private service providers, provide school linkages with guidance staff for student special needs interventions. Mew Futures Case Management Court Probation Officers Elementary Area Schools A. Twenty-one area schools report developing positive linkages between home and school. Elementary Magnet Schools A. All elementary magnet schools report developing positive linkages between home and school. 5. Create academic intervention strategies on a school basis. 5 (Include academic. . .in the annual school plan) 597 07/01/93 08/25/93 09/02/93 01/03/94 01/03/94 07/01/93 06/30/94 75X 75X 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 (kmnselors, LRSD Heu Futures Liaison, Associate and Assist. Supts., Deputy S^\u0026gt;t. (Principals, Staff, Asst. Supts.) 4.1 Established coamnity linkages 4.1 (Report will reflect the nunber of community linkages and their ability to meet the needs of targeted students) 5. (Annual School Report to include level of successful academic intervention as identified in the annual school improvement plan)Prograa Seq *: 12 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Prograa Goal: Plan Reference Page Niaber B  Secondary Leader: Page: 42 Revision Date: Othello Faison Mey 2, 1994 To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4. (cont'd) 5.1 Each school to put into its annuel plan a desi^ied set of interventions to help increase student academic success\ni.e. Peer Tutoring, Volunteer Tutors. A. Utilize DSC as tutors. B. Institute academic individualized training in language arts, reading, and mathematics via PACE training system. C. Utilize 9th grade students as peer counselors and tutors 508 07/01/93 08/23/93 08/23/93 75X 75X 75X Principals, Staffs of BuiIdings, Assistance froai Educational ProgroBS, Associate and Asst. Supts. 5.1 Annual plan and annual evaluation report coaparison 5.1 (Annual School Report to include level of successful academic intervention as identified in the annual school improvement plan)LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Pase: 43 Progran Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Maae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuiber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Cospletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 37 S. To provide guidance and counseling which makes students aware of their options and to assist students in acquiring habits and attitudes necessary for success in school and in later life. (07/01/93) (06/30/94) (Principals, Counselors, Teachers, Staff Development) 1. Provide minicourses for students in study halls, testing skills, and pre- career skills in a sequenced program beginning in grade four and through high school. 1. (Offer test-taking, study skills, and pre-career skills through the elementary and secondary instructional and guidance programs) A. Provide students with practice taking standardized tests using the Test of Adult Basic Education (matched with the PACE program). 509 07/01/93 11/01/93 06/30/94 33X 1. Data gathered frost ptpit services team 1. (Data gathered by the Pupil Services Team will reflect an increase in the nurber of students passing courses, nunber of students who elect post high school career/educational opportunities, and a decrease in the dropout rate)Page: 44 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niiit\u0026gt;er 1.1 Page 37 5. (cont'd) L 37 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.1 1.2 1.2 Minicourses to be developed in sequence beginning with grade four. Provide teacher staff developamnt in the use of curriculua in these areas. (Offer appropriate staff development to teachers to support teaching of the curriculun) 510 07/01/93 06/30/94 Principals, Classroom Teachers, VIPS, Guidance Comselors, Staff Dvlp. 1.1 Development of ainicourses 1.1 (Data gathered from grade distribution sheet will reflect an increase in nuvber of students who passed the courses and elect post high school career/ educational opportunities and a decrease in the dropout rate) 1.1 (Scope and sequence chart grades 4-12 that includes skills targeted for each level) 07/01/93 06/30/94 Curriculua staff. Staff Developaent Director 1.2 Staff participation in these (comparative nuiRiers) 1.2 (Staff use of acquired skills will be reflected in daily instruction and in the students' academic achievement)Pave: 45 ProgrM Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Rasa: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Htufcer L 37 L 37 5. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. Raise awareness of student of (about) future career options. 2. (Increase student knowledge of future career options.) 2.1 Use of resource volunteers in classes and asseablies beginning in elementary schools to address career options. 511 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 (Curricului) staff. Staff Development Director, Pupil Services) Teachers grades 4-12 (VIPS, Partners in Education, Pupil Services, Counselors) 2. (Decreased drop-out rate, number of students who elect post high school career/educationaI opportunities will increase) 2. (Annual district survey will reflect a percentage increase in the number of students who pass courses, who elect post high school career/education opportunities, and a decease in the dropout rate) 2.1 Roater of voliaiteers, dates 2.1 (Decreased drop-out rate, number of students who elect post high school career and educational opportunities will increase)LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 46 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nimber 6. Page 3S 1.1 Page 38 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coopletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6. To onnitor student class ratios and instructional practices to ensure equal opportmities for all students. 1. Achieve equity in class structure by grade and by stA\u0026gt;ject area. Review master schedule. 1.1 Review class ratios by stdiject, by class, (and) by teacher on a seaaster basis. A. Review master schedule. B. Review findings of biracial conmittee. 512 07/01/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 12/15/93 7SX 75X 75X 75X 75X 75X Principals, Assistant Stpts., Associate Sipts. Principals, Assistant Stilts., Associate St\u0026lt;its. 6. Sufficient prograa personnel are in place to aeet the needs of all students in the prograa as measured by the onnitoring instnjaent. 1. (Principals will be responsible for assigning students to grades and to subject areas in an equitable ratio as defined by the LRSD desegregation plan) (Principals are responsible for making sure that their school's profile reflects equitable educational practices) 1.1 Monitoring of ratios* and student outcoams 1.1 (The school profile should reflect equity by grade structure and by subject area) *Ratioe are not to be construed as quotas. The intent is for all barriers preventing full participation in classes and progrooB to be reanved.Page: 47 Prograai Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograai Haae: In*School Suspension Prograai Code: 27 Priaery Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograai Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuitier 1.2 Page 38 1.3 Page 38 2. Page 38 2.1 Page 38 6. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccnpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.2 Address disparities with intervention activities. A. Use PACE to determine level student is working to individualize instruction. 1.3 Reanve (address) barriers to equitable participation of students. 2. Achieve equity in student instructional practices. A. Review teaching practices by observing 2.1 Review grade distribution by subject, by class, fay teach^ on a seaester basis. 07/01/93 01/04/94 07/01/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 75X SOX 50% 75X SOX (Teachers, Counselors, Principals, Asst. Supts., Associate Supts.) (Teachers, Counselors, Principals, Asst. Supts., Associate Supts (Principals, Teachers, Staff Development) Principals, Assist. Su^s., Assoc. Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. 2. 1.2 (Disparities will decrease in educational programs) (Each school's annual plan will include intervention activities to address disparities) 1.3 (Disparities will decrease in educational programs) (Principals and staff will meet to identify and address barriers existing to equitable participation and will docunent in school profile) (Each school's annual plan will identify an effective staff development program which will assist teachers in appropriate instructional practices that will ensure equity) 2.1 Monitoring of BBSter schedulesPage: 48 Progm Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuitwr Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6. (cont'd) 2.1 (Principals will review each nine weeks in order to address iimtediate problems) 2.1 (Each building principal will require a grade distribution sheet by subject, by class, and by teacher each nine weeks in order to monitor equity. A copy to is be forwarded to the Assistant Superintendent) A. Review lesson plans. 09/28/93 SOX B. Review grade distributions. 10/22/93 SOX C. Review learning and teaching styles. 10/22/93 SOX 2.2 Page 38 3. Page 38 2.2 Address disparities (in educational practices) with intervention activities. 3. Achieve equity in teaching aethods. 07/01/93 SOX 513 (Principals, Teachers, Staff Development) (Principals, Teachers, Staff Development) 3. 2.2 (Each principal will develop a schedule for classroom visits and conferences and correct any identified disparities in instructional practices) (Principals and teachers will develop intervention activities to achieve equity in teaching methods and plans for reducing disparity)Page: 49 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2. 1994 Prograa Naae: In*School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Ntiiter 3.1 Page 38 6. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccxnplction Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.1 Provide inservice assistance to principals and teachers in reference to variant learning styles and effective aathods. 07/01/93 SOX Staff Development, Huaan Resource, Principals, Asst. Signs.. Assoc, sigits. 3.1 Attendance at inservice 3.1 Classrooa visitations 3.1 (Principals will monitor each classroom to observe the instructional activities, tone of conmunication, interaction patterns, and the involvement of learners with the teacher to observe effective teaching methods. Evidence of ifimediate feedback to the teachers will be recorded) A. Provide on-site training for staff. 08/16/93 SOX B. Encourage inservice workshops during AEA convention. 11/03/93 11/05/93 C. Review discipline referrals by teacher 08/23/93 75X 514LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: SO Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2. 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Niadier 7. Psge 39 1. Page 39 1.1 Psge 39 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 7. To provide and ensure opportuiities and encouragement to all students to participate in extracurricular and co- curricular activities and to assess the results of school practices, paying special attention to their iqpact on minority and disadvantaged students. 07/01/73 SOX School team (Principal, Counselor, Specialist, and Teachers) 7. (Each school's profile Mill reflect equitable representation of all students in extracurricular and co- curricular activities) 1. Infora all students and patrons of co- curricular/extracurricular activities available for students and of participation requireaants. A. B. 07/01/93 SOX School Team (Principal, Comselor, Specialist and Teachers) 1. Meet the guidelines related to the extracurricular and co- curricular activities Distribute school handbooks as students are enrolled. Provide opportunities for parental input during assenblies and through conferences. 1.1 Use of aedia and press 515 08/23/93 08/26/93 07/01/93 SOX SOX SOX (Conmun{cations Dept.) Coonwi cat i ons Dept., Principals, Staff, PTA Board, Educational Programs, School-based Director of Extracurricular Activities 1. (Evidence of information supplied to students and school patrons) 1.1 Log of annomceaants, aadia usage, other coaasjnity contactsPage: 51 Prograa Seq f: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Program Naae: In-School Suspension Program Code: 27 Primary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Program Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nintier 1.2 Page 39 1.3 Page 39 7. (cont'd) 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria ALTERWATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. B. C. 1.2 1.3 Coverage by Arkansas Democrat- Gazette coverage for Aquaculture Project launch. Students host Alternative Learning Center weekly radio broadcast over station KA6F. Publish school newsletter for students and parents. Send printed information to parents. Make clear ptA\u0026gt;lic address system announcements to students. 51C 11/03/93 10/06/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 11/03/93 25X SOX SOX Principals and Individual Staff Mp^ra Principals and Individual Staff Me^ra 1.1 (The Communications Dept, and local schools will keep a record of all announcefflents, media usage, and other community contacts in order to increase the community public relations activities) 1.2 (Comparative review of data regarding numbers of applicants and participants by race) (The number of students participating will be compared to the mutter of parents receiving information and will be recorded as baseline data for yearly comparison for evaluation) 1.3 (A log containing data and messages pertaining to curricular and extracurricular announcements will be maintained by the principal/designee)Page: 52 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Or. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nuntier 1.4 Page 39 2. Page 39 2.1 Page 39 7. (cont'd) (^jectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.4 Use coBBKiity agencies such as churches to assist with recruitment. 1.4 (Develop school recruitment plan) 2. Staff recruitment of students to participate. 2.1 Individual staff contacts with students to encourage involvement. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER A. Provide for round table for individual students in need of special counseling. B. Provide for DSC mentoring. C. Keep scrapbook end audio-visual library of all school assemblies. 517 07/01/93 07/01/93 10/26/93 08/23/93 08/26/93 SOX SOX SOX SOX SOX Principals and Individual Staff Meidicrs Principal and individual staff aesijers 2. (Develop and implement the school recruitment plan) 2.1 (Teachers will document the name, race, and sex of students contacted to encourage involvement) 2.1 (Comparative review of data regarding numbers of applicants and participants by race)Pttge: 53 Prograa Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal\nTo provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Nurber 2.2 Page 39 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategics Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. Page 39 3.1 Page 39 4. Page 39 4.1 Page 39 3. 4. 4. 2.2 Staff shall specifically recruit from among students who do not typically participate in particular activities. Increase student participation, particularly minority student participation in cocurricular activities. 3.1 Profile student involvement in each cl(i\u0026gt; and activity. Reanve (identify and address) all barriers to equitable participation of students who wish to participate in extracurricular activities. (Collect data that will identify barriers to students who wish to participate in extracurricular activities) 4.1 Provide a district transportation program for student transportation when necessary to assure equitable participation for students participating in district- sanctioned extracurricular activities. 51b 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 SOX SOX SOX SOX SOX (Principal, Staff, Cornmunications Dept.) (Principal, Staff) Principal, Staff (Principal, Staff) Manager of Support Services, Assoc. S^\u0026gt;t. for Desegregation, Assistant Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;ts. (Director of Transportation) 3. 4. 2.2 (Increase in the nunber of students participating in nontypical programs) (Teachers will document names of parents they contact for assistance in urging their children to participate in particular activities) (An increase of minority participation in co-curricular activities) 3.1 Yearly (annual) analysis of participation data and coafMrative profiles (The school profile will reflect equitable representation of the school population) 4.1 Yearly (annual) analysis of participation data and coafMrative profiles 4.1 (Survey the schools to see how many students will need transportation in order to assure equitable participation)Page: 54 Prograi Seq *: 12 Reviaion Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Naae: In-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Plan Reference Page Mirtwr 4.2 Page 39 5. Page 40 S.1 Page 40 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.2 Provide a program for students' access to equiparnnt/unifonas, etc., needed for participation at minimal cost. 4.2 (LRSD will develop guidelines explaining the procedures in acquiring equipment/uniform needs at minimal cost wilt be available to students) 5. Develop (and use) school profiles (to) provide overview of school success or its iafject on students so that changes and/or interventions can take place as needed. A. Monitor student needs for clothes, glasses, FINS, etc. and make recomnendation through Pupil Services from United Way. 5.1 Profile school fay: a. grade distribution b. attendance c. disciplinary outcoaes d. test scores e. student involvement in school- related activities f. course enrol lamnts/special program enrol laents 519 07/01/93 07/01/93 08/23/93 07/01/93 SOX SOX SOX SOX Principals (Principals and Staff, Monitoring Teams) Principals, Staffs, Assistant Si^ts. 4.2 (Track the utilization of the program in order to determine the number and cost) 5. (An assessment of the data collected for the school profile will be reviewed by the principals and staff at each school to determine degree of student success and if any new procedures or changes need to take place) 5.1 Use of data-based school profiles 5.1 Yearly coafiarative students 5.1 Production of iiqirovcaRnt plans to address disparitiesPage\n55 Progran Seq *: 12 Revision Date: May 2, 1994 Prograa Haae\nIn-School Suspension Prograa Code: 27 Priaary Leader: Dr. Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Othello Faison Prograa Goal: To provide equitable educational opportunities for students experiencing difficulties (attendance and/or disciplinary) in regular school settings. Pion Reference Page Nurber Objectives Strategies ginning Date Corplction Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Page 40 5.3 Page 40 7. (cont'd) 7. (cont'd) 5.2 Data to be disaggregated by race. 07/01/93 SOX (Principals, Pupil Services Team, Teachers) 5.3 Provide for development of and iiqilementation of intervention strategies to atifress disparate situations with specific steps for iiqx*oveBKnt. 07/01/93 SOX (Principals, Pupil Services, Team, Teachers) 520 5.1 (The data based school profiles by grade distribution, attendance, and disciplinary outcomes will be analyzed each nine week period to make recommendations for change where indicated. The data based school profiles by course enrolIment/special program enrollment will be analyzed each semester. The data based school profile by test scores will be analyzed and compared annually) 5.2 Outcoaas evaluation 5.2 (Data in annual school report) (All data submitted in the school's annual report is to be disaggregated by race) 5.3 (Based on the data provided by the schools in the school profile each school team will address and docunent the disparate situations with specific steps for improvement on the identified timeline in 5.1)LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq #: 13 Page: 1 Revision Date: May 7, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: F15 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Description: In addition to the enrichment programs, Dunbar is a full participant in the New Futures for Little Rock Initiative. (The purpose of the New Futures junior high school restructuring initiative is to establish a school climate, culture, and curriculum that is responsive to the developmental needs of early adolescent youth and the particular needs of at-risk students. The scope and content of the program focuses on the development and implementation of (1) school restructuring which engages teachers and administrators in the long-term process of expanding their thinking and engage in basic and fundamental changes around issues that affect how they teach and support all students utilizing the site-based management, (2) developing and implementing middle school practices and programs (3) developing and implementing specific intervention programs and practices for at-risk youth through school improvement which may be based on the Effective Schools Research . This program impacts the total school community including teachers, students, staff, administrators, and parents at each New Futures school. Restructuring Schools: Cloverdale Junior High, Forest Heights Junior High, Pulaski Heights Junior High and Southwest Junior High Schools.) District Qoal Support: (1) Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that alt students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. (2) Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. Program Qoal: Goal I. (To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students.) Goal II. (To promote collaboration/coordination between local schools and other youth serving agencies in the community.) Plan References: L 145 FY Program Budget: $530,400.00 1st Qtr Expend: $114,500.07 3rd Qtr Expend: FTE YTD Expenditures: 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: I Related Function Codes: 521LRSD FY 93 94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19. 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 145 1. Clustering for 7th and Sth grade students to allow students to have teachers in common in the core subject areas providing for an advisor/advisee support system. (Two heterogenous student team (clusters) at each grade level (7-8-9) allows teachers to share a common group of students.) (1. Establish two heterogeneous student teams at each grade level (7-8-9).) 07/01/93 06/30/94 New Futures Liaison, Principals {1. Student team rosters, identifying team names, agendas, and participant evaluations.) A. Two heterogeneous student teams established at each grade level (7-8-9). 07/01/93 08/23/93 New Futures Liaison, Principals B. Interdisciplinary teaching teams established at each grade level (7-8-9). 07/01/93 08/23/93 New Futures Liaison, Principals C. Staff development provided on: Strategic Imperatives of Restructuring. 07/23/93 07/30/93 New Futures Liaison D. Staff development provided to steering committees on: School-Based Decision Making. 09/23/93 10/06/93 New Futures Liaison E. Assistant Principals' collegial support group meeting. 09/15/93 09/15/93 Chairman of collegial group. New Futures Liaison F. Leadership Training provided for all team leaders. 08/09/93 08/09/93 New Futures Liaison G. Training provided on:Designing Knowledge Work for Student Success. 522 08/10/93 08/11/93 New Futures Liaison, Lead TeachersPage: 3 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria H. Training provided for all Learning Foundation staff. 08/12/93 08/13/93 New Futures Liaison i. Workshop for 7th grade Learning Foundations staff. 09/14/93 09/14/93 New Futures Liaison J. Workshop for Sth grade Learning Foundations staff. 09/15/93 09/15/93 New Futures Liaison K. Training provided on: Understanding At-Risk Youth. 08/03/93 08/04/93 New Futures Liaison L. Training provided on: Cooperative Discipline. 08/12/93 08/13/93 New Futures Liaison, Lead Teachers M. Training provided on: Developing and Implementing Peer Mediation Programs. 08/12/93 08/13/93 New Futures Liaison, Lead Teachers N. Conference participation in National Conference on Peer Mediation (2 teachers, 1 assistant principal). 08/14/93 08/18/93 New Futures Liaison 0. Conference participation in UALR Peer Mediation/Conflict Resolution conference (6 teachers). 08/20/93 08/23/93 New Futures Liaison P. Provide staff development and support in establishing advisor/advisee programming. 07/01/93 75% New Futures Liaison, Principals 523Page: 4 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Q. Conference participation in Middle Level Summer Institute (7 teachers/2 assistant principals) in developing advisor/advisee programming. 07/18/93 07/24/93 New Futures Liaison R. Training provided for:Advisor/Advisee programming. 08/12/93 08/13/93 New Futures Liaison, Lead Teachers, Lead Assistant Principals S. Staff development provided to steering committees on: School Based Decision Making. 10/05-06/93 10/06/93 New Futures Liaison T. Staff development provided to principals on: School Based Decision Making. 10/19/93 10/19/93 New Futures Liaison U. Staff development provided to assistant principals on School Based Decision Making. 10/20/93 10/20/93 New Futures Liaison V. Staff development: Making Language Learning Meaningful for Southwest Junior High English teachers. 10/08/93 11/11/93 10/08/93 11/11/93 New Futures Liaison/Supervisor of English W. Staff development: Making Language Learning Meaningful for Cloverdale Junior High English teachers. 524 10/09/93 11/12/93 10/09/93 11/12/93 New Futures Liaison/Supervisor of EnglishPage: 5 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria X. Learning Foundations on site technical assistance (classroom observation/follow up conference): FHJH - Learning Foundation staff PHJH  Learning Foundation staff CLJH - Learning Foundation staff SWJH - Learning Foundation staff 10/13/93 12/02/93 10/14/93 12/03/93 10/15/93 11/08/93 12/01/93 10/13/93 12/02/93 10/14/93 12/03/93 10/15/93 11/08/93 12/01/93 New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison Y. Staff development: Reading Process and Semantic Webbing (5-8:30 p.m.) 10/14/93 10/14/93 New Futures Liaison Z. Staff development provided on: Process Communications Skills to examine personality styles in relation to self-image and human interaction. 10/27-28/93 10/27-28/93 New Futures Liaison AA. Staff development for 7th grade Learning Foundation staff. 11/09/93 11/09/93 New Futures Liaison BB. Staff development for 8th grade Learning Foundations staff. 11/10/93 11/10/93 New Futures Liaison CC. Conference participation and presentations at National Middle School Association annual conference (6 teachers/3 assistant principals). 11 /04-07/93 11/04/-07/93 New Futures Liaison DO. Staff development on: Designing Knowledge Work for Student Success. 12/14-15/93 12/14-15/93 New Futures Liaison 525Page: 6 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria EE. Staff development provided to steering committees on: School Based Decision Making. SWJH CLJH PHJH/FHJH 11/01/93 11/16/93 11/17/93 11/01/93 11/16/93 11/17/93 FF. Staff development provided on: The Writing Process and Collaborative Teaching Strategies. (5:00 - 8:30 p.m.) 11/07/93 11/07/93 New Futures Liaison GG. Assistant Principals' Collegial Support Group meeting. 12/15/93 12/15/93 New Futures Liaison, Chairman of Collegial Group HH. Learning Foundations on site technical assistance (classroom observation/follow-up conference): CLJH - Learning Foundations Staff FHJH - Learning Foundation Staff SWJH  Learning Foundation Staff PHJH - Learning Foundation Staff II. Staff development for 7th grade Learning Foundation staff. JJ. Staff development for Sth grade Learning Foundation staff. KK. Staff development on: Designing Knowledge Work for Student Success. 01/18/94 02/02/94 01/31/94 02/03/94 01/19/94 01/20/94 01/25-26/94 02/22-23/94 52R 01/18/94 01/02/94 01/31/94 02/03/94 01/19/94 01/20/94 01/25-26/94 02/22-23/94 New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures LiaisonPage: 7 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number L 145 2. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria LL. MM. NN. 00. PP. Incentive programs and partnerships with community businesses to encourage and reward achievement, attendance, and good citizenship. (2. A. B. C. Staff development provided on: Process Communications Skills to examine personality styles in relation to self-image and human interaction. Staff development: Making Language Learning Meaningful: Southwest Junior High English teachers. Staff development: Peer Coaching for all Learning Foundations staff. Staff development: Implementation of Peer Coaching program for all Learning Foundations staff. Conference participation: Drugs, Gangs, Violence and Guns: Law Advisory Government Education (4 assistant principals). Assist individual teaching teams in the development and implementation of incentive/innovative programs to recognize academic achievement, improved discipline and improved attendance.) A Young Professionals Club: Pirates, Team, Southwest Junior High. Breakfast club: Wings Team, Pulaski Heights Junior High. Peer Mediation Program: Wings Team, Pulaski Heights Junior High 02/15/94 01/27/94 03/10-11/94 04/05-08/94 03/10/94 07/01/93 08/23/93 08/23/94 08/23/94 527 02/15/94 01/27/94 03/10-11/94 04/05-08/94 03/10/94 75% 75% 75% 75% New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison, Principals (2. Team documentation will reflect program implenentation and numbers of students involved.)Page: 8 Program Seq #: 13 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Linda Young Program Goal: Goal I. To assist local schools in the process of fundamental change and school reform to redesign schools that can provide success for all students. Plan Reference Page Number L 145 L145 L145 3. 4. 5. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Homework Center and Hotline. Early morning tutorials for students needing assistance in study areas. Saturday morning detention for students to help them \"work off\" disciplinary sanctions, to keep them in school, and to provide additional tutorial support. (A Saturday morning detention pilot was operational school year 1988-89. Replaced by comprehensive in-school suspension program.) (3. {4. (5. A. Establish Homework Centers which will be operational through the After School Program. Assist local schools in establishing homework assignment hotline.) Develop and implement After School Programming. Tutoring activity opportunities are offered through the After School Program so that transportation can be provided.) Establish in-school suspension program.) In-school suspension program operational. 528 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 75% 06/30/94 75% New Futures Liaison New Futures Liaison, Principals, Lead Teachers New Futures Liaison, Principals New Futures Liaison, Principals (3. Student participation rosters, implementation of hotline program.) (4. Student participation rosters.) (5. Alternative disciplinary response to suspendable actions.)Program Seq #: 13 Program Name: New Futures Program Code: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 145 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Goal II. To promote collaboration/coordination between local schools and other youth serving agencies in the community. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date 1. Youth Specialists for advocate work with students in helping to meet their needs. (Case Management System is operational.) {1. Work cooperatively with New Futures for Little Rock Youth to establish school-based collaborative social service efforts for at-risk students-case management system.) 07/01/93 06/30/94 A. Case management system operational\nservices being provided. 529 07/01/93 75% Page: 9 Revision Date: April 19, 1994 Linda Young Responsibility New Futures Liaison, Principals New Futures Liaison, Principals Evaluation Criteria (1. Increased number of students receiving needed services reflected in case management data reports.)LRSD FV 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq #: 14 Page: 1 Revision Date: May 7, 1994 Program Name: Academic Incentive Grant/Focused Activities Program Code: 13 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Gremillion, Robertson, Anderson Program Description: The Academic Incentive Grant Program is intended to provide funds to identify and implement strategies based on promising practices to enhance student achievement and reduce the disproportion in academic achievement among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and economic status. Each area school will be able to apply for a total of $75,000 over a three-year period. This amount will be issued to the schools in increments of $25,000 each year, and the carryover of funds will be permitted. Area schools may receive funds to identify and implement strategies based on promising practices to enhance student achievement and reduce the disparities in academic achievement among groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and economic status. Teachers^building administrators and patrons shall participate in the development of the local school proposal. Grant proposals should avoid additional personnel costs to the extent possible. The District will not assume responsibility for continuing costs that occur after the expiration of the funding period. Approval Criteria: A panel wilt review all applications according to the following: (1) A detailed and well-planned proposal\n(21 Appropriate goals and objectives\n(31 Well-documented need: (41 innovativeness\n(5) potential for replicability\n(61 realistic budget\n(7) quality of evaluation\n(81 ability to continue after grant period ends\n(91 documentation of teacher, administrator, and patron involvement during proposal development\nand, (101 use of volunteers and/or collaborative efforts with businesses, outside organizations, etc. Focused Activities - Each area school shall have a fundamentally sound and strong basic education program. Each area school shall also have the option of developing focused activities (which may center around a themel after appropriate community and parental involvement. All focused activities must promote the desegregation objectives ordered by the court. The elementary area schools (non-incentive and non-interdistrictl will receive an annual allocation for implementing the focused activities for the school year. The purpose of the focused activities shall be threefold: (II to promote the school as a \"community of learning\" among parents, staff and students\n(21 to provide enrichment opportunities at the building level\n(31 to ensure equitable opportunities for participation in the elementary area schools. The focused activities of each area school will be integrated into the core curriculum or reflected in the school's environment and dav-to-dav activities. The academic performance of area school students will indicate achievement gained partially as a result of enrichment experiences provided by the core program and enrichment activities. Area school students will participate in ongoing, meaningful enrichment activities that complement and extend the core curricular activities. All area schools will be viewed by the community as providing equitable and excellent educational programs. The Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District agree that the implementation of focused activities (LRSDI and specialty programs (PCSSD) in the district's elementary schools could be a collaborative effort (II in enriching each district's elementary curriculum and (21 in achieving greater racial balance through voluntary interdistrict and intradistrict, transfers, LRSD plans to implement only focused activities in all of its elementary area schools, LRSD accepts that only magnet, incentive and interdistrict schools in Little Rock School District will have specialty themes and LRSD agrees to develop procedures in cooperation with PCSSD to prevent unnecessary duplication of specialty themes within the two districts, LRSD will, in collaboration with PCSSD, publicize the specialty programs and encourage matoritv to minority transfers between the two districts. Once a final decision is made regarding the implementation of specialty programs, additional areas of collaboration between PCSSD and LRSD will be explored, LRSD agrees to address any possible areas of collaboration with NLRSD, should it decide to implement specialty programs. District Goal Support: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. Program Goal: (11 To enrich each district's elementary curriculum to achieve greater racial balance through voluntary interdistrict and intradistrict transfers. (2) The Little Rock School District will establish an Academic Progress Incentive Grant Program, the goals of which will be to (al improve the education of all students and (bl reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. (31 Each non-magnet and non-incentive elementary school will provide focused activities for the total school population including attention to gender, race and socio-economic issues. (41 Each school will be recognized as a community of learning in which all students, staff members, and parents are totally involved and supportive, (51 The focused activities of each non-magnet and non-incentive elementary school will be integrated into the core curriculum or reflected in the school's environment and day-to-day activities, (61 All elementary area school students will participate in ongoing, meaningful enrichment activities that complement and extend the core curricular activities, (71 All elementary area schools will be viewed by the Community as providing equitable and excellent educational programs. Plan References: L 81, 85 FY Program Budget: $352,294.55 Ist Qtr Expend: $26,486.11 3rd Qtr Expend: $43,379.45 FTE YTD Expenditures: $73,725.77 2nd Qtr Expend: $3,860.21 4th Qtr Expend: Related Function Codes:LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Prograa Seq *: 14 Reviaion Date: April 20, 1994 Prograa Haaa: Academic Incentive Grant/Focused Activities Prograa Code: 13 Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Gremillion, Robertson, Anderson Prograa Goal: To enrich each district's elementary curriculum to achieve greater racial balance through voluntary interdistrict and intradistrict transfers. (Focused Activities) Plan Reference Page Nuaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CoBf\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 81 (1.0 To implement focused activities in elementary area schools.) 07/01/93 06/30/94 Asst. Supt. At the end of each school year, the activities coordinator will include focused activities in a district-wide report. 1 report will focus on the following items: This 1. the degree to which each focused activities have been interrelated with the core curriculim\n1.1 Prior to the beginning of each school year, the principal of each elementary area school will appoint from his or her staff an activities coordinator and a school steering committee. A. Districtwide Steering Connittee co- chairmen designated, co-chairmen. Charge given to B. Steering Connittee members identified. C. Established first meeting for Steering Connittee. 1.2 This connittee will develop an activities action plan for the school year, detailing grade level activities, school-wide activities, field trips. resource speakers, ai materials, supplii w: faded lipment. 07/01/93 03/16/94 03/25/94 03/25/94 07/01/93 06/30/94 03/16/94 03/25/94 03/25/94 06/30/94 Asst. Supt. Asst. Supt. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. the mmber of enrichment activities that broadened the students' experience base\nthe amount of parental involvement\nacademic achievement as reflected on standardized tests and yearly grade reports\nthe racial and socioeconomic composition of the student population in each elementary area school\nthe number of voluntary majority to minority transfers\nthe type and amount or enrichment materials/ supplies/purchased by each elementary area school through the focused activities budget\nPage: 3 Prograa Seq *: 14 Revision Date: Prograa Naae: Academic Incentive Grant/Focused Activities April 20, 1994 Prograa Code: 13 Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Gremillion, Robertson, Anderson Prograa Goal: To enrich each district's elementary curriculum to achieve greater racial balance through voluntary interdistrict and intradistrict transfers. (Focused Activities) Plan Reference Page Ntaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Caaf\u0026gt;letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 From this action plan a checklist will be developed by the activities coordinator. This checklist will be used by the activities coordinator, the principal, and the school conmittee to monitor the program throughout the school year. 1.4 The checklist will also be used to assist the activities coordinator in preparing a report each semester to be submitted to the assistant superintendent who will review the reports and identify areas that need to be addressed to expand or revise the activities at each school. 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 Asst. Supt. Asst. Supt. 8. the type and rxinber of staff-deveIopment activities at each elementary school.LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 4 Prograa Secfl: 14 Revision Date: April 20, 1994 Prograa Naae: Academic Incentive Grant/Focused Activities Prograa Code: 13 Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Gremillion, Robertson, Anderson Prograa Goal: To improve the eckjcation of all students and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students in different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. (Academic Incentive Grants) Plan Reference Page Ruaber L 85 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccmpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. To provide means for local area schools to (1) improve the education of all students, and (2) reduce the disparity in achievement among students of different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. 1. (The nuiber of low q achievers will decrease as evidenced by upward quartile movement on the norm referenced test.) A. Funds are budgeted for grants 07/01/93 06/30/94 Conptroller B. Funds are approved for grants 1.0 Identify Grant Review Comnittee. A. Grant Comnittee identified Estelle Matthis, Margaret Gremillion, Russ Mayo, Victor Anderson, Sterling Larry S. Robertson Ingram, 1.1 Develop continuation proposal and progress report format. A. Request for proposal developed 1.2 Distribute continuation proposal and progress report format. 1.3 Conduct grant-writing inservice. 533 07/01/93 07/01/93 10/18/93 07/01/93 10/7/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 10/18/93 06/30/94 10/18/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 Board (Deputy Supt.) Associate Supt. Educat. Programs, and Dir. Planning, Research and Evaluation Asst. Supt., Assoc. Supt. Educ. Programs and Deseg. (Deputy Supt.), Asst. Supt., Dir. Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Dir. Staff Development 1.0 List of comnittee menbers. 1.1 Completed Request for Proposal. 1.2 Completion of distribution (Copy of distribution memo). 1.3 Copy of agenda.Page: 5 Prograa Seq*: 14 Revision Date: April 20, 1994 Prograa Maaa: Academic Incentive Grant/Focused Activities Prograa Code: 13 Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Gremillion, Robertson, Anderson Prograa Goel: To improve the education of all students and to reduce the disparity in achievement among students in different racial, socioeconomic, and gender groups. (Academic Incentive Grants) Plan Reference Page Hiatter Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Grant writing inservice conducted for Area School Principals 1.4 Area schools submit continuation grants to review committee. A. Proposals submitted to review committee 1.5 Make grant awards 10/20/93 07/01/93 10/24/93 07/01/93 10/27/93 06/30/94 12/10/93 06/30/94 Dir. Staff Development Principals Grant Review Conmittee 1.4 Receipt of grant proposal. 1.5 Copy of completed review criteria list of schools receiving grants. I A. All grants were approved. (Schools must submit to the Conmittee by January 31, 1994 all requested revisions including the evaluation criteria) 12/16/93 12/16/93 B. Grants received 1.6 Schools submit progress reports L 85 1.7 Conduct program evaluation. A. Information secured for three- year evaluation. B. Identified for ''fast track evaluation.\" C. Staff provided directions for evaluating programs. 12/06/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 07/01/93 01/31/94 06/30/94 06/30/94 01/15/94 01/15/94 06/30/94 Principals Asst. Supts. 1.6 Review of Quarterly Monitoring Reports. 1.7 Final evaluation report. 5TTLRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq #\n15 Page: 1 Revision Date: May 9. 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis/Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie T. Carter Program Description: The McClellan Community School provides programs and services which expand the use of the facility, making it the center of many activities and much community involvement. The school serves as an anchor for the community, a focal point of intense interest, activity and loyalty. District Goal Support: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operation. Program Goal: (1| To operate and maintain programs that enhance community involvement. (2\u0026gt; To provide an education service to the community. Plan References: L 93. L 94 FY Program Budget: $170,112.24 Ist Qtr Expend: $82,090.64 3rd Qtr Expend: $28,741.36 FTE 2 YTD Expenditures: $149,283.48 2nd Qtr Expend: $82,090.64 4th Qtr Expend: Related Function Code 1 NOTE: The 2 FTE's are included in a separate fund and are not charged against the operating budget. 535LRSD PY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq #: 15 Revision Date: May 9, 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie Carter Program Goal: {!) To operate and maintain program that enhance community. (2) To provide an education service to the community. Plan Reference Page Number L 93. 94 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (1. To enhance the educational format at McClellan through eradication of racial disparities on test scores) (1.1 Develop a short range plan of action to help close the disparity gap between black and white students) A. Community Education and 3 year plan of action. a. Discuss plans for evaluating the Three Year Plan. b. Discuss a survey on evaluating the Three Year Plan. c. Set a meeting to discuss the Three Year Plan in June or July 1994. d. Set up a committee for each area on the Three Year Plan. e. Locate services that relate to areas on the Three Year Plan. f. Create a coalition with services linked or related to the Three Year Plan. g- Create a resource file on services identified in Community Education's Three Year Plan. h. Draft documentation of Community Education mission statements, goals, and objectives. B. Tutoring Program K-8, First Phase a. 42 students were tutored during first phase 536 09/01/93 01/23/93 01/10/94 02/07/94 02/07/94 06/30/94 06/30/94 12/14/94 06/30/94 02/21/94 09/13/93 09/13/93 06/31/94 50% 02/07/94 02/07/94 07/31/94 12/14/94 12/14/94 12/15/94 06/30/94 03/07/94 12/09/93 12/09/93 (Principal CE Director and staff PTSA Council Depts.) (District and school level documentation)Page: 3 Program Seq #: 15 Revision Date: May 9, 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie Carter Program Goal: (1) To operate and maintain program that enhance community. (2) To provide an education service to the community. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria b. Discuss plans for a survey on Tutoring service c. Create a survey for Tutoring Program for each phase d. Locate other tutoring programs in ths states e. Create a survey for students participating in the Tutoring program f. Create a survey for parents with children participating in the tutoring program g. Create a survey for tutors to express their ideas and thoughts about the tutor program. C. McClellan Students as tutors for building self- esteem, First phase. a. 20 McClellan students tutored during the first phase b. Flyers distributed to students who are potential tutors c. Tutoring letters sent to teachers d. Encouraging students to become tutors e. Tutor Coordinator lecture encouraging students to become tutors f. Displayed posters on school campus as a recruitment tool for student tutors g. Tutoring tetters sent to parents h. 17 McClellan students tutored (Jurim second phase. 0 O \u0026lt; le 01/15/94 02/17/94 date 04/05/94 04/05/94 04/05/94 09/15/93 09/15/93 01/10/94 01/10/94 01/07/94 01/10/94 01/10/94 date 01/31/94 06/30/94 06/30/94 07/30/94 07/30/94 07/30/94 12/09/93 12/09/93 02/01/94 02/01/94 02/01/94 02/15/94 02/15/94 05/13/94Page: 4 Program Seq #: 15 Revision Date: May 9, 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie Carter Program Goal: {1) To operate and maintain program that enhance community. (2} To provide an education service to the community. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria i. Students encouraged to tutor during the school year by offering summer paid counselor positions during Community Education's 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp. j. Encouraged McClellan student tutor volunteers to brainstorm funding sources for 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp. a. Student tutor, David Fields, volunteered to write a letter requesting funding from local citizen. b. Tammy Thomas suggested tutors have a fund raising booth at FUNFEST. D. Review 3 year plan a. Planning and discussing the review of the three year plan in May, 1994 b. Plan an orientation for the McClellan Advisory Board in June or July, 1994 c. Revise the Advisory Board Orientation material for Three Year Plan d. Schedule meetings inviting all advisory members to express ideas and concerns on Three Year Plan e. Prepare survey to use at review meetings f. Prepare meeting using quality management format g. Use brainstorming techniques during meeting 538 03/03/94 03/15/94 03/25/94 03/25/94 09/13/93 12/13/93 03/10/94 06/07/94 07/11/94 07/11/94 07/11/94 07/11/94 06/13/94 06/13/94 05/31/94 05/14/94 09/13/93 33% 07/31/94 07/31/94 09/30/94 09/30/94 09/30/94 09/30/94Page: 5 Program Seq #: 15 Revision Date: May 9, 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie Carter Program Goal: (1) To operate and maintain program that enhance community. (2) To provide an education service to the community. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria h. Sign up volunteers toward Three Year Plan committees i. Create a presentation following quality management format on orientation revision. E. Plan strategies of student tutoring network a. Possible donation of a computer network by a local organization b. Discussion about computer network donation Feb. 25, 1994 and March 7, 1994 c. Follow up on computer network donation on March 14, 1994 d. Initiate a computer search on all student tutoring network systems on March 22, 1994 e. Initiate a computer search on tutoring programs for high school students f. Contact state agency on computer network system 9- Discuss forming a network committee focusing on tutoring issues h. Locating and making a list of potential individuals for tutoring netowrk Locate software to help enhance computer program. j- Review software programs for tutoring program 1. Skills Bank 111 for IBM computers 2. Jostens tutoring program 3. GED 2000 539 07/11/94 05/07/94 12/13/93 01/11/94 01/11/94 01/11/94 02/15/94 01/13/94 01/11/94 01/19/94 02/1 5/94 01/14/94 03/01/94 09/30/94 07/31/94 50% 12/20/94 03/07/94 03/14/94 06/30/94 04/01/94 12/20/94 12/20/94 12/20/94 09/30/94 03/24/94Page: 6 Program Seq ft'. 15 Revision Date: May 9. 1994 Program Name: McClellan Community School Program Code: 26 Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Victor Anderson Secondary Leader: Jodie Carter Program Goal: (1) To operate and maintain program that enhance community. (2) To provide an education service to the community. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria k. Due to efficiency, effectivness, cost wise Skills Bank III was written for purchase request waiting for approval F. Recruit students as instructors for Community Education classes a. Community Education Director made presentations in various classrooms for recruitment b. Meetings with Pulaski Vo-Tech Director and Coordinator of Recuritment for Community Education classes c. Continuous meeing on recruitment for fall classes 03/24/94 12/16/93 01/28/94 01/18/94 01/12/94 04/25/94 40% 01/28/94 01/18/94 02/01/94 d. Students with high ACT scores invited to teach and tutor classes 02/21/94 03/03/94 20 McClellan students made higher than 20 on their ACT December, 1993 test 4 of the students scoring high on the ACT made formal presenations at ACT Lock-In G. Have in school\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_587","title":"Principal selection process, Williams Magnet School","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1994-05/1994-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Williams Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School principals","Educational statistics","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Principal selection process, Williams Magnet School"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/587"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["126 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n^ricansasDe: HURSDAY, MAY 5,1994 Magnet panel goes to bat for principal BY DANNY SHAMEER Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The chairman of the committee overseeing Little Rocks magnet schools threatened Wednesday to ask a federal judge to prevent Superintendent Henry Williams from unseating the principal at a magnet school. Bobby Altom, chairman of the Magnet Review Committee, backed off after Williams assured him that he would go before the committee first  as required by a court order. The matter, though, doesnt appear to be over. We are still concerned about whos going to be in our u magnet schools, Altom said. No question about that. .Any time you change leadership or the appearance of leadership at a school, people loyal to that school become concerned. The days developments between the superintendent and the court-created committee unfolded quickly as talk spread about widespread reshuffling of principals across the Little Rock School District. More than a dozen schools could have new faces in the principals office next school g year. Five principals, includin\nDr. Ed Jackson of Williams Magnet Elementary School, got See PRINCIPALS, Page 11A Principals _ Continued from Page 1A letters from the district saying that because the superinten- ' dent was uncertain about their .positions next year, their contracts as principals would not be renewed. Instead, they would be re- hired for the next school year as unassigned. That would leave them employed at their existing salaries, but would allow the district to .either keep them in their cur- . rent posts or move them elsewhere. . Richard Hurley, the districts personnel director, confirmed the five principals names and schools:  Jackson at Williams Magnet .  Walter Marshaleck at Ma- belvale Junior High.  Gayle Bradford at\nCloverdale Junior High.  Levanna Wilson at Bale El-\n ementary.  Charity Smith at Southwest Junior High. : It was the letter to Jackson .that prompted the threat from  Altom to take the matter to fed- eral court. '\nWilliams and Altom said another principal, Donna Davis, who heads Gibbs Magnet Ele-\nmentary School, is resigning and taking early retirement. Davis\ndeclined to comment Wednes- ^day.  Hurley said the superinten- dent is negotiating with another\nprincipal, .Mary Jane Cheatham :at Baseline Elementary, about other jobs in the district. The status of more than a dozen principals may change next year in the 52-school district. The district is under federal court supervision as part of the Pulaski County school desegregation case. The committee was set up to oversee ma^et schools, which offer academic themes to attract more white students into the district.  U.S. District Judge Susan - Webber Wright said in a Nov. 5, 1992, order that the district must consult with the Magnet Review Committee and seek permission from the court before making any staffing changes at the magnet schools. Williams said in an interview Wednesday that he is assessing leadership and trying to find people to fill various slots in the district. No principal works for a school, Williams said. Every principal works for the school district and serves in the district in whatever capacity we need. We dont own the buildings\nwe work in the buildings. Our responsibility is to the district. Katherine Mitchell, a Little Rock School Board member, said she supports Williams decisions to make any changes he deems necessary. She said Williams has spent a lot of time in the districts schools. I think the changes will bring about positive results, Mitchell said. Change for change is one thing, but when youre making changes for reasons, it can be quite productive.FRIDAY, MAY 6.1994 Parents, staff lobby to keep principal : We want stability is one reaction to transfer from Williams Magnet  BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer . About 60 parents and staff .members from Williams Magnet\nElementary School praised\ntheir principal Thursday and asked Superintendent Henry 4Williams to reconsider his de- Icision to move Dr. Ed Jackson elsewhere. d A Parent Richard Kalkbrenner called Williams the flagship -Jschool in Pulaski County. The A ,school has the highest test scores in the area and only a rimThimum of discipline prob- Iletfis, he said. He attributed its Success, in part, to Jackson. \nIn the South we have an ex- ^ pression, Kalkbrenner told the Iriew superintendent. Youve /.[Irobably heard it: If it aint l}roke, dont fix it.  y \u0026lt; Williams met with the par- ients and staff members Thurs- .Iday afternoon at their request. J ' .The Arkansas Democrat- Gazette reported Wednesday Uliat Jackson, principal at Williams the last six years, has been rehired but not yet assigned to any school for the 1994-95 school year. More than a dozen principals in the districts 52 schools are expected to change next year because of retirements and involuntary transfers of principals. Williams did not name a new principal for the school, but said he hoped to make recommendations to the school board by late next week. He said he was awaiting retirement decisions from some people. He also said he hadnt ruled out the possibility of hiring one or more principals from outside the district. Parents and staff told Williams they feared a new principal wouldnt be as strong a disciplinarian or as good an influence on the pupils. Others said they feared an exodus of the current school staff and a period of instability as teachers and a new principal develop a working relationship. Others expressed a sense of betrayal, having selected Williams as their childs school based on the belief that Jackson would be the principal. Not all parents at the meeting Thursday expressed opposition to the change. Jerry Bradley objected to the schools PTA leaders taking a position on the principal and said he felt some racism was involved. The superintendent is black. Jackson and many of his supporters at the meeting are white. Bradley said that while he supported the Williams Magnet School concept, he has had extreme difficulty working with Jackson. Williams tried to assure parents and staff that he would not weaken the magnet school or place someone in the building who would destroy the program. As superintendent, his decisions must be based on what is best for the entire school district, not just one school, he said. The superintendent said he had detected some complacency in district schools and that sometimes when you stir the pot, good things at the bottom come to the top. That remark prompted one mother to say she didnt want the pot stirred. We want stability in the schools. We dont like scrambling, she said. Williams empathized with the parents and told of his own experience after being assigned the principals job at the worst school in Rochester, N.Y. The school led the league in the number of slashed tires, broken windows and Inexperienced teachers, he said. After the school became one of the top 10 in New York, Williams was assigned to an- ,other building against his wishes and those of the students parents. Williams moved to Virginia, ( but the Rochester school remained strong and was later visited by a U.S. president because of its record.C a/- May 16, 1994 Editor Arkansas Democrat Gazette East Capitol \u0026amp; Scott Little Rock, AR 72201 MAY 1 7 1994 Dear Editor: Office of Desegregation Monitoring The gross mishandling of the transfer of principals, especially Dr. Edwin Jackson, in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) for the past month has prompted me to write this letter. I have enclosed the Little Rock School District's 1993 Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) scores that have published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. not (to my knowledge) been The high scores made by students in Williams Magnet School makes a powerful case for keeping Dr. Jackson in the most successful school in the city! In other words, \"If it ain't broke, why fix it? Does it not surprise you that prominent Little Rock citizens. Governor Jim Guy T'ucker, Senator Jim Keet, and Arkansas Democrat Gazette Owner Walter Hussman, do not have their own children enrolled in Little Rock School District?! One can surely not blame them for enrolling their children in private schools with Little Rock School District's extremely low SAT scores as a clear indication of what is not being taught and/or learned in LRSD! If I have the correct information. Dr. Jackson has over 30 years administrative experience in the Little Rock School District, him the most tenured school administrator in the district. This makes He has been acknowledged by his peers in Arkansas and the nation as a National Distinguished Principal. When I had the pleasure of visiting Williams Magnet School I noticed pictures of Dr. Jackson being honored and recognized for his leadership by then governor, President Bill Clinton\nby former Secretaries of Education, Terrell Bell and William Bennett\nand by former First Lady, Nancy Reagan, that can boast these recognitions. I know of no other school administrator Dr. Jackson appears to be the one bright and shining star in the ranks of school administrators in not only this city but the state and nation. Obviously, Superintendent Williams, has complimented him by saying, \"I'm moving my successful principals to schools that desperately need help. \u0026gt;1 I ask you to look at the SAT test scores of the schools on the list who have unassigned principals. I certainly \"did not fall off the last turnip truck out of town.\" Just check the low scores of these schools - Bale, Baseline, Cloverdale, and Mabelvale - with unassigned principals. Dr. Jackson, according to Little Rock School District files, is 62 years old. It has been rumored that he plans to retire at 65. Why would a school district take the most tenured, successful principal in the most successful school and notify him that he would not be recommended for a principal's position in 1994 and that he would be unassigned? I don't know the answer to this guestion because it is so incomprehensable. Please, LRSD Board Members and Patrons, let Supt. Williams know that the community the superintendent' s boss and you have a voice in school district's future. our Sincerely, A Concerned, Taxpaying CitizenFUTURE PRINCIPAL SCHOOL LAST TYPE NAME FIRST NAME ASSIGNED SCHOOL 1993 SAT, COMPLETE BATTERY PR SCORES ..................GRADES-................. 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 71H 8TH 9TH 1 VAC 2 HEINS 3 VAC BALE BASELINE FAIR PARK ELE ELE ELE 4 DAVENPORT fRANKLlH INCENTIVE ELE 5 WARD 6 VAC 7 ZEIGLER 8 VAC 9 DAVIS MABELVALE RCMINE INTERDIST WASHINGTON MAGNET WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE WILSON CHEATHAM HEINS DAVIS DAVENPORT WARD BUCHANAN JACKSON ZEIGLER 10 VAC 11 VAC 12 BUCHANAN 13 VAC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CLOVERDALE FOREST HEIGHTS 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 HENDERSON MAGNET MABELVALE OTTER CREEK TERRY BOOKER MAGNET FOREST PARK MCDERMOTT JEFFERSON CLOVERDALE BADGETT RIGHTSELL CARVER MAGNET GIBBS STEPHENS JR HI BRADFORD JR HI MAPLE JR HI WATTS LAVANNA PR MARY J BARBARA FRANKLIN JULIE LIONEL KAREN ED GWEN GAYLE RICHARD CLELL UNASSIGNED UNASSIGNED BASELINE WILSON ELE ELE FRANKLIN INCENTIVE? ELE MA3ELVALE HENDERSON MAGNET UNASSIGNED WASHINGTON MAGNET ELE JR. HIGH ELE 41 VAC FULBRIGHT WATSON WESTERN HILLS BRADY ISH GARLAND CHICOT WOODRUFF DOOD WAKEFIELD ROCKEFELLER MITCHELL PULASKI HEIGHTS MEAD OUCL IFF GEYER SPRINGS METROPOLITAN 38 28 13 39 27 34 34 33 33 31 25 29 46 12 40 30 44 35 35 54 29 38 55 27 27 34 39 43 31 45 48 29 34 57 42 57 47 48 49 53 49 56 84 83 69 81 73 80 80 43 49 4 7 34 39 JR HI KARSHALECK WALTER ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE UNASSIGNED EXPECT RETIREHT RETIRING UNASSIGNED 30 44 43 36 31 45 42 36 36 43 43 36 ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE VOC DILLAHUNTY OOYLE RETIRING 40 66 60 68 59 66 68 55 51 70 4 7 68 41 44 40 55 67 59 71 79 66 79 62 61 60 75 59 62 50 64 46 72 61 70 65 69 45 74 48 59 44 81 17 33 47 22 29 31 43 65 35 41 31 40 76 72 69 74 64 72 41 71 70 76 61 74 46 22 28 33 25 40 46 54 60 64 58 59 27 31 33 39 42 48 44 53 51 55 46 49 38 31 40 32 33 49 14 45 44 41 56 47 23 48 16 30 32 45 23 23 27 49 31 46 30 40 52 45 42 46 19 16 35 37 41 55 28 20 39 34 37 33 40 42 45 34 31 44 29 24 24 38 34 44 54 47 61 64 46 49 21 47 39 41 46 52 20 26 45 44 34 54Editor Arkansas Democrat Gazette East Capitol \u0026amp; Scott Little Rock, AR 72201 May 16, 1994 MAY 1 7 1994 Dear Editor: Office of Desegregation Monitoring The gross mishandling of the transfer of principals, especially Dr. Edwin Jackson, in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) for the past month has prompted me to write this letter. I have enclosed the Little Rock School District's 1993 Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) scores that have published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. not (to my knowledge) been The high scores made by students in Williams Magnet School makes a powerful case for keeping Dr. Jackson in the most successful school in the city! ain't broke, why fix it?\" In other words, \"If it Does it not surprise you that prominent Little Rock citizens. Governor Jim Guy Tucker, Senator Jim Keet, and Arkansas Democrat Gazette Owner Walter Hussman, do not have their own children enrolled in Little Rock School District?! One can surely not blame them for enrolling their children in private schools with Little Rock School District's extremely low SAT scores as a clear indication of what is not being taught and/or learned in LRSD! If 'I have the correct information. Dr. Jackson has over 30 years administrative experience in the Little Rock School District, him the most tenured school administrator in the district. This makes He has been acknowledged by his peers in Arkansas and the nation as National Distinguished Principal. Magnet School I When I had the pleasure of visiting Williams noticed pictures of Dr. Jackson being honored and recognized for his leadership by then governor. President Bill Clinton\nby former Secretaries of Education, Terrell Bell and William Bennett\nand by former First Lady, Nancy Reagan, that can boast these recognitions. I know of no other school administrator a Dr. Jackson appears to be the one bright and shining star in the ranks of school administrators in not only this city but the state and nation. Obviously, Superintendent Williams, has complimented him by saying. It I'm I moving my successful principals to schools that desperately need help.\" ask you to look at the SAT test scores of the schools on the list who have unassigned principals. out of town.\" I certainly \"did not fall off the last turnip truck Just check the low scores of these schools - Bale, Baseline, Cloverdale, and Mabelvale - with unassigned principals. Dr. Jackson, according to Little Rock School District files, is 62 years old. It has been rumored that he plans to retire at 6S. Why would a school district take the most tenured, successful principal in the most successful school and notify him that he would not be recommended for a principal's position in 1994 and that he would be unassigned? I don't know the answer to this guestion because it is so incomprehensable. Please, LRSD Board Members and Patrons, let Supt. Williams know that the community i^ the superintendent's boss and you have school district's future. voice in our a Sincerely, A Concerned, Taxpaying CitizenFUTURE PRINCIPAL SCHOOL LAST TYPE NAME FIRST NAME ASSIGNED SCHOOL 1995 SAT, COMPLETE BATTERY PR SCORES ..................GRADES.................- 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 71H 8T1I 9TH 1 VAC BALE ELE UI LSON LA VAN NA UNASSIGNED 38 2 HEINS 3 VAC BASELINE FAIR PARK ELE ELE A DAVENPORT FRANKLIN INCENTIVE ELE CHEATHAM HEINS DAVIS 5 WARD 6 VAC Z ZEIGLER MABELVALE ROMINE INTEROIST WASHINGTON MAGNET ELE ELE ELE 8 VAC WILLIAMS MAGNET ELE 9 DAVIS WILSON ELE 10 VAC CLOVERDALE 1 1 VAC FOREST HEIGHTS DAVENPORT WARD BUCHANAN PR MARY J BARBARA FRANKLIN JULIE LIONEL KAREN UNASSIGNED BASELINE WILSON ELE ELE FRANKLIN INCENTIVE? ELE MABELVALE ELE JACKSON ZEIGLER ED GWEN HENDERSON MAGNET UNASSIGNED WASHINGTON MAGNET JR. HIGH ELE 13 27 34 33 48 47 84 80 28 39 34 33 31 29 48 83 43 25 40 29 35 A6 29 12 27 39 A3 34 57 A9 53 69 81 49 47 30 35 38 27 31 42 49 73 34 44 54 55 34 45 57 56 80 39 12 BUCHANAN 13 VAC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 HENDERSON MAGNET MABELVALE JR HI BRADFORD JR HI MAPLE JR HI WATTS GAYLE RICHARD CLELL OTTER CREEK TERRY BOOKER MAGNET FOREST PARK MCDERMOTT JEFFERSON CLOVERDALE BADGETT RIGHTSELL CARVER MAGNET 2A 25 GIBBS STEPHENS 26 27 28 FULBRIGHT WATSON WESTERN HILLS 29 30 31 32 33 BRADY ISH GARLAND CHICOT WOODRUFF JR HI MARSHALECK WALTER ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE UNASSIGNED EXPECT RETIREHT RETIRING UNASSIGNED 30 44 43 36 31 45 42 36 36 43 43 36 ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE 34 35 36 37 38 39 AO 0000 WAKEFIELD ROCKEFELLER MITCHELL PULASKI HEIGHTS MEADOUCLIFF GEYER SPRINGS Al VAC METROPOLITAN ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE ELE VOC DILLAHUNTY OOYLE RETIRING 40 68 41 71 60 46 45 17 43 76 41 46 A6 27 AA 38 14 23 23 30 19 28 40 29 54 21 20 66 55 44 79 75 72 74 33 65 72 71 22 54 31 53 31 45 48 23 40 16 20 42 24 47 47 26 60 68 51 70 40 55 66 79 59 62 61 70 48 59 47 22 35 41 69 74 70 76 28 33 60 64 33 39 51 55 40 32 44 41 16 30 27 49 52 45 35 37 39 34 45 34 24 38 61 64 39 41 45 44 59 47 67 62 50 65 44 29 31 64 61 25 58 42 46 33 56 32 31 42 41 37 31 34 66 68 59 61 64 69 81 31 40 72 74 40 59 48 49 49 47 45 46 46 55 33 44 44 46 49 46 52 34 54* MAY-18-94 THU 14:26 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX-NO. 5013246576 /7A rV/ P. 05 - 20 ^'Vj May 17/ 1994 Hon. Susan Webber Wright United states District Judge 600 West Capitol Ave. Little Rock, AR 72201 ^AY 19 S WSTSi ''? C?-' \u0026gt;-'y. 1334 Dear Judge Wright/ I am writing today. net only as an involved parent of Williams Magnet, but also of the Little Rock School District. As the individual staffing changes. with the final authority in all district I am addressing my concerns to you. I am concerned about the transfer of Dr. Ed Jackson from Williams Magnet to another school. This is a concern shared by what I feel is a majority of the parents, teachers. staff at the school. elementary enrolling because schools. My wife both public and and I investigated our oldest child at Williams. private. prior and many to We Ghose Williams of its discipline, accomplishments, reputation, strict I truly believe that and the presence and influence of Dr. Jackson. his role in the success of Williams Magnet can't be overated. When news of his transfer reached the school. there was an immediate outcry not to do this. The issue was brought to the attention of Dr. Williams, and he met with a group of parents to discuss the change. Dr. Williams prefaced the meeting by explaining that he was moving Dr. Jackson so that his Ke expertise also made could be used to strengthen a weaker school. justify, stand. it perfectly in his opinion, clear that unless we could changing that decision. it would As a business person, decision to try and use Dr. I can understand Dr. Williams another district, school. He is Jacksons abilities to improve not just williams. superintendent of the entire What I do not understand is his seeming indifference, and condescending attitude toward the legitimate at williams. concerns of the parents. teachers and staff If Dr. Williams truly feels that the transfer of Dr. Jackson is in the best interest of the district and you and However, the Magnet Review Committee agree, so be it. how can he make that decision without knowing who the replacement will be? I feel we have a right to know. cont.HAY-19-94 THU 14:27 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO, 5013246576 P, 06 page 2 Hon. Susan Webber Wright It ' decisions would 1 and help their if he would be hesitant to explain justification. more Dr. open about his Williams seemed patents of the the changes in details schools involved have a Part rounds. of the problem are the Some say that this is a rumors that which I believe right to know. are making the Dr. Jackson and some of his superiors. personal problem between Another is that this is an attempt to get Dr. Jackson to retire, thus saving the district his salary which is said to be the highest of any elementary school principal. The most moving Dr. disturbing rumor is that Dr. Williams is friend, a These Jackson in order to replace him with a personal neighbor in fact/ from outside the district. rumors, and Dr. Williams reluctance to either confirm or dispel them, are basic to the conflict. One Williams final thought. as I attended the meeting with Dr. support for keeping Dr. Jackson. I could tell from his opening remarks that the decision was made, with no chance However, of reversal, another Williams decision. so I had decided to remain parent in attendance, quiet. made the statement a supporter of Dr. were trying to keep Dr. Jackson, that he thought we not for his abilities, but to prevent the placement of a black person as principal. He felt it was all racially motived. I then felt compelled to speak, making it clear that I don't care about the race of a principal, only in the education of my children. I can't speak for all the parents and staff there, but I personally was offended and angry. get two children into Williams, I have camped-out to and I'm planning to do the same for my third, all the while living in a predominately white is, elementary district. Race is not the issue. If it then I suggest making assistant Mitchel ths new principal. principal Deborah She is experienced in the Magnet School system,.she knows the Williams Magnet philosophy, and she is respected by the parents. teachers, and staff. We just want some assurance that this change is best interests of the students and not truly in the personal conflicts. I don' t believe this move IS standards, but on petty politics. based on I believe educational it is Dr. Williams flexing his muscles to show the district who's the boss / and he will never appearing weak. chanae     his mind for fear of My wife wrote all of these concerns to the school board, and one member called her at home to let her know she was correct in her nothing that member could do. do. assumptions, but there was There is something you can cont- MAY'-19-94 THU 14:27 SUSAN U WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 07 page 3 Hon. Susan Webber Wright This ia that these important to the district. staff changes/ especially Dr. benefit William's Magnet as well as the district. Please make Jackson's, sure will Don't let a staring contest between administrators/ waiting to see who will blink first/ model schools. to copy/ tear down Williams's Magnet. Make it the not a source of material to patch other Thank you very much for your time. As a taxpayer and a parent/ I believe that it is not only my right but ray duty to question decisions that affect my children. believer in the saying I am a firm and so are my children\"/ decision. \"My heart is in the public schools/ and I want to feel safe in that S incerely/ Kenny Clark 6 Calais Court Little Rock, AR 72211 (501)821-2983July 11, 1994 Magnet Review Committee Donna Grady Creer, Executive Director 1920 North Main North Little Rock, Ark. Dear Ms. Creer, RECEIVE JUL 1 3 1994 Office of Desegregation moi ...a Concerned parents of Williams Magnet School request a meeting of the Magnet Review Committee to address the selection process for the Principal at Will lams Magnet. Parents were represented on the Interview Team and, at the completion of the Principal interviews, submitted the names of the top three candidates. In comparison of these three candidates, the credentials and qualifications for assignment to a Magnet School would not rank Mary Menking at the top of the list. However, she was assigned to Williams Magnet. Concerned parents woiiLd like to know how the selection process was finalized. What criteria were used to select the new Principal? Our concerns as parents are the following about Ms. Menking: *has experience as an area school Principal ONLY. *has very limited familiarity with the Magnet School Program. *is unfamiliar with the philosophy and tradition of Williams Magnet School. *as Principal of Brady Elementary, was accountable for standardized test ranking substantially less than the 80th percentile of Williams Magnet School. *is unfamiliar with the planned expansion process. The assignment of a Principal should be for the benefit of the magnet program. The parents of Williams Magnet need answers as to how this assignment can truly benefit the magnet program. The future of OCR CHILDREN is at stake! Should one interview be the deciding factor for Principal assignment? Concerned parents do not think so! The individual's credentials, track record\", qualifications, character, and overall personnel file should be reviewed. If they were, in this case, we would like to know how Mary Menking was selected over the other two candidates.At a meeting Williams Magnet parents had with Henry Williams two months ago, he \"assured us that a Principal of equal or better caliber would be assigned to Wi 111ams Magnet.\" We ask, as concerned parents, to evaluate the selection process used and determine if the most appropriate individual was chosen. An overall 90% satisfaction in Principal assignment was NOT achieved, as Dr. Williams had previously indicated. Please inform us when a meeting can be scheduled to discuss our concerns, for your support. Thank you Jebnnie Price Williams Magnet School Parents Representative 1412 Nicole Drive North Little Rock, Ark. 72118-2951 771-1654 cc: Judge Susan Webber Wright Aim Brown, Federal Desegregation Monitor Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District Board of Directors\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_204","title":"Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) implementation plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1994-03-15"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) implementation plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/204"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["14 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Introduction ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Implementation Plan Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement Table of Contents Part I A. Benchmarks B. Intervening Events Since the Original Settlement Agreement Part II A. Goals and Objectives Linked to Legal Obligations B. Organization Part III A. Description of Monitoring Operations B. Timelines of Key Activities between March 15, 1994, and June 30, 1995 C. Controlling and Coordinating the Implementation Phase MAR 1 5 1994 Officeo f DesegregatMioonn itoring 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Introduction ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Implementation Plan Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Implementation Plan to the parties and the Court. On Monday, January 3, 1994, ADE Director Gene Wilhoit appointed the ADE's Desegregation Working Team consisting of 12 persons from within the Department and naming Rodger Callahan and Emma Bass as Co- Interim Planners. Several of the Working Team members participated during December in developing the ADE's Development Plan. The Desegregation Working Team membership was revised on January 19, 1994. This Implementation Plan developed by the Team is, as required in the Court's Order, a \"comprehensive and detailed written cyclical implementation plan which will guide AD E's actions in following the steps, outlined in the initial Development Plan, that lead into the ensuing implementation phase. \" In developing the Implement,,tion Plan, the Team concentrated much of its attention to understanding the legal obligations in the Settlement Agreement and the 1989 Monitoring Plan and to considering, in detail, how existing programs at the ADE can be adapted to provide the monitoring operation to meet the legal obligations. The Team is mindful that AD E's legal obligations include monitoring desegregation compensatory education programs, but also encompass the responsibility to assist the Districts in addressing problems identified through the monitoring process. To this end, the Team collaborated with all parties involved to obtain their input on several elements of the Implementation Plan. This document is the product of the Team's work and input received from other interested parties. Special attention should be paid to the sections entitled \"Benchmarks\"\n\"Intervening Events Since the Original Settlement Agreement\"\nand \"Commitment to Principles. tr The Team devoted a considerable amount of time developing the \"Benchmarks\" section. This section identifies those critical educational indicators that have proven or shown great promise of providing guidance to educators in their evaluation of school success and supervised student learning. The section entitled \"Intervening Events Since the Original Settlement Agreement\" identifies those events related to the Settlement Agreement and the established benchmark conditions that have occurred between 1989 and 1994. It then describes these events and the impacts they have on the benchmark conditions and on the ADE and the Districts' abilities and 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I capacities to fulfill their legal obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the 1989 Monitoring Plan. Under the \"Commitment to Principles\" section, the State Board of Education and all ADE sections reaffirm their commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles.  PART I A. BENCHMARKS Student Learning Student learning benchmarks should incorporate clear and challenging academic standards and should describe students' progress in grades K through 12 with longitudina data. Student learning is measured by \"learner outcomes\". While the term was used here in a generic sense, it also relates specifically to new approaches being developed by the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE). \"Arkansas Learner Outcomes: A Vision for Outcomes-Based Education\", published by ADE in October, 1991, lists four \"learner outcomes. 11 They are:  Students will acquire core concepts and abilities from the sciences, the arts, the humanities, mathematics, social studies, language arts, foreign languages, physical/health education, practical living studies, and existing/ emerging technologies.  Students will apply various thinking/problem solving strategies to issues related to ail subject matter fields, to all school-related activities, and to real life situations.  Students will exhibit/ demonstrate attitudes and attributes which will promote mental, physical, and emotional health.  Students will demonstrate good citizenship and function as positive members of the local, national, and world communities. Opportunity to Learn Learning standards define accessibility for learning to all students. These standards could address alignments of curricula, materials and resources in content areas\ncapacity of educators to provide high quality instruction, appropriate assessments and organizational structure of schools. The scheduling of classes and programs may be an example of denying students an opportunity to learn. If access to resources, such as teachers, materials and special programs is scheduled when some students 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cannot participate, those students are being denied the opportunity to learn. \"Developmentally appropriate curriculum\", being made available by Districts, regardless of agl\n:!, is another example of \"opportunities to learn\". Learning Readiness Learning readiness is associated more with preschool and early elementary grade students. That is, getting students ready for entering school\ngetting them ready to learn. Stt,.Jents' normal growth and development prepare them to learn certain concepts at different stages of development. Developmental progress varies individually. Learning readiness means getting the students prepared to learn as they enter preschool and eo.rly grades. Federal programs ciassify these stages in ages up to 8 years. Family, Community, Public Support Family, community and public support include parental involvement in supportive roles and activities, including volunteers in schools\nparents-teachers association\nattendance and support of extracurricular events\nattendance at school-wide meetings\nparticipation in magnet school contracts. Other examples include:  business community support of individual schools such as the \"Adopt a School\" program\n0 public support evidenced through approval of bond issues for local financing of school programs and facilities\n students withdrawing for home schooling programs would be a negative indicator of public support for schools. Success After Graduation from One Level to Another This benchmark was originally intended to be \"success after graduation\" from high school. Team members felt that success from one level to another was also very important and should be considered within this benchmark. Also, students other than college bound students should be assessed for \"success after graduation\" including vocational education students. High school counselors should keep track of all students awarded scholarships. School Improvement Schools prepare school improvement plans as a self study and peer review process\nand school impPovement plans and reports provide data. for monitoring and identify technical assistance neaded by the Districts. School Improvement Plans refer to school districts and sites as systems. 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. INTERVENING EVENTS SINCE THE ORIGIN.AL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The ADE has identified those intervening events related to the Settlement Agreement and the benchmark conditions established in Part I. A. that occurred between 1989 and 1994. The following is a list and description of these intervening events and the impacts they have on the benchmark conditions and on the ADE and the Districts' abilities and capacities to fulfill their legal obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the 1989 Monitoring Plan.  MAT 6 to Stanford 8 ADE changed standardized tests from the MAT 6 to the Stanford 8. The impact is that data are not available from the same instrument for both 1988/1989 and 1992/1993 school years, except through conversion tables. Students in Grade 3 are rio longer administered the Minimum Performance Test (MPT). Also, ADE is in a transition phase on the MPT\nit will not be used after the 1993/1994 school year. In addition, during this transition phase, there is no retention factor for 8th grade students as of the 1992/1993 school year. MPT will be available for 6th and 8th graders in 93/94\n8th grade lVIPT will be based only on one administration for 93/94\nin the past, the 8th grade MPT was based on the third administration and reported data were the result of the 3rd administration. The impact is that the MPT is anothe:\n_n source of info1mation that was available in 1988/1989, but will not be available for the 1994/1995 school year and for the school years in the future.  COE/SITES Since 1989, the Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation ( COE) and a federal program entitled, \"School Improvement Through Effective Schools\" (SITES) have been implemented. The COE is a comprehensive self study\n80% of all school sites are in the process\nthe School Improvement Plans are data driven. COE started with a 1989/90 pilot covering 20% of school sites and these Districts now have 80% of their schools in the process. The impact is that for the first time ever all schools in the state by the end of the 1994-95 school year will be involved in a formal, data-driven school improvement process. Specifically, the three Pulaski County School Districts will be in varying stages of the Extended COE process that emphasizes all aspects of the ADE monitoring responsibilities as outlined in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan.  School Accreditation The annual report for the school accreditation process has been computerized, making data available more quickly. The reports provide a three year computerized history of standards violations\na process for tracking certified staff\nmore data and more readily accessible data\nsome 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I data are available for the 88/89 year\nthree years of d\u0026amp;ta are available for the North Little Rock School Disc . .\"ict (NLRSD) and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCS SD)\nand 4 years of data are available on the Little Rock School District (LRSD). The impact is that through computerized reporting, the ADE can more effectively track improvement in the areas of hiring, standards violations, and document areas of concern.  Equity Equity is one of 19 goal areas for state standards. Districts are being held accountable for meeting equity standards for accreditation. Protected classes of students will have learning needs carefully scrutinized. The impact includes requiring districts to submit improvement plans for each equity goal area in which the learning needs of protected classes of students are not being met . ., Minority Recruitment Initiative The Minority Recruitment Initiative (MRI) puts more pressure on ADE and the districts to do more minority recruitment\nstate law is that if a District has more than 5% minority students, those districts are required to have a minority recruitment plan submitted to ADE. The MRI is one of the districts' obligations that ADE will monitor regardless of the Settlement Agreement.  Court Scrutiny This intervening event recognizes that with increased court scrutiny, the Districts and ADE are under more pressure to adhere to the Settlement Agreement obligations. The Court hearing process has brought the Districts and the ADE under new scrutiny\nthe Districts have modified their plans, gaining exemptions an--- seeking new elements. On January 18, 1991, the District Court converted the Office of Metropolitan Supervisor into the Office of Desegregation ~.1onitoring (ODM), to monitor the parties' compliance with the Settlement plans and to assist the Court and the parties in achieving desegregated public school systems.  Revised Special Educaton Standards The Special Education section of ADE has coordinated the revision an ' publication of a new state plan as reqt::..red by Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1411-1420). This pla!l will be in effect for the fiscal years 1994 (beginning J1\nly 1, 199-\u0026gt;), 1995 ..:,nd 1996. Policies, procedures, certifications and assurances addressed in this document also include references pertaining to preschool grants applications. This section also revised two other documents: Program Standards and Eligibility Criteria for Special Education and Referral, Placement and 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appeal Procedures for Special Education. These regulations implement the policies of the provisions of Arkansas Code Annotated Sections 6-41-202 through 6-41-223 (Repl. 1993)\nand 20 U.S.C. Sections 1400-1485, Public Law (PL) 94-142 as amended, the IDEA\ntraining was presented on these new regulations at the beginning of the 1993-94 school year (August and September). One additional component included in the above standards also addresses students with specific learning disabilities ( SLD). These standards set forth criteria for SLD determination which include the use of regression analysis in determining the existence of a severe discrepancy between ability and achievement. A psychometrically sound definition of \"severe discrepancy\" can be established using regression analysis. Therefore, for purposes of establishing SLD eligibility, the following standard applies: A severe discrepancy is considered to exist between the student's ability and achievement when the level of severity is equal to or greater than two (2) or more standard deviations (SDs) at the fifty percent (50%) or above level or probability as determined by regression and analysis. This process will help to further reduce the overreprescntation of minority students in special education. Another publication was produced in the summer of 1992: Specific LearningDisabilities - An In-Service Training Manual for Regular Classroom Teachers. This was the result of Arkansas Act 338 of 1991 which promotes the goal of teaching students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment - to the maximum extent appropriate, with their non-disabled peers. This training manual was developed to help regular education teachers become more aware of learning disability characteristics, to make appropriate modifications, and to implement more effective teaching strategies. The intent was not to increase the number of students being referred to special education, but to provide programming for such students to be successful in the regular classroom. Training was offered to all special education supervisors and school district regular education representatives in July, 1992. The ADE Special Education section compiles and monitors statewide information on special education students by gender, race, disability, and grade on an annual basis. The analysis of such data provides the basis for districts to closely examine patterns and practices which may contribute to overrepresentation and over-identification of minority students in special education. These findings become the basis of districts' plans (submitted to the ADE) for addressing the identified issues. The district is then in a position to implement practices to overcome faulty prac ices through such things as staff development.  Revised Pre-School Special Education Regulations and Standards Pre-school programs provide early identification of and intervention for students with disabilities. Criteria for identification are developmental in nature, and allow for noncategorical identific ...t.i on when appropriate. In 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I addition to data collected on the childrens' disabilities, data are collected by gender and race. These data are not currently analyzed for overidentification and overrepresentation, as there is no averag8 daily attendance (ADA) or average daily membership (ADM) make-up with which to compare it for 3-5 year olds. A major intent of pre-school programs is the early identification of children with disabilities which may ad ersely affect their learning if interventions are not undertaken to eradicate or lessen the effect of the disability on learning. The impact is that thus far these programs have been highly successful n reducing the need for special education services as children enter kindergarten and first grade. Analysis of transition data shows that for the past two years 62 and 63 percent of students served in these preschool programs have entered school without the ongoing need for special education services. They enter on a \"level playing field\" with other non disabled peers. This has a positive effect on reducing disparities among learners, especially minority students. They also are not stigmatized by being categorized as \"special education\" students.  Reduced Federal Funding for the Districts Federal funding received by the State to be passed on to school districts statewide has been reduced from $67 million to $55 million\na formula determines what portion of the federal funds each district receives.  Statewide Compensatory Education For state Compensatory Education, the funds extracted from our annual $8 million budget to the Districts in fiscal year 1993-94 are as follows: 1992-93 1993-94 $2,020,197.05 $7,998,690.00 The school year programs, exclusive of their summer programs, approved and implemented for the three Pulaski County school districts during 1993-94 are described as follows: 60-01 Little Rock: Literacy Intervention Program Cornerstone Project to teach selected students Reading, Writing and Spelling 60-02 N. Little Rock: Parent/Homework Center Middle School Drop-Out Prevention Program ( Computer lab, tutorial) Turning Point (Assisted Instruction) Reading Recovery 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 60-03 Pulaski County: Computer Lab Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Tutorial The funds assigned during the 1993-94 fiscal year to each of the three school districts previously cited are as follows: Districts 1992-93 1993-94 Totr1ls 60-01 LRSD $0 $527,260.00 $527,260.00 60-02 NLRSD $9,349.01 $225,090.00 $234,439.01 60-03 PCSSD $241. 094 .68 $454,690.00 $695,784.68  Early Childhood/Primary Initiative Act 846 of 1993 provides for the restructuring and strengthening of the educational system to enable all students to perform at their potential in reading, math, and language, and to achieve essential skills in problem solving and thinking by the end of third grade. In order to accomplish these goals, ADE is developing a plan with the following components: (1) preventing academic nroblems through improved readiness programs\n( 2) sustaining progress ~,1 the primary grades through curriculum modifications in content, procedures, and schedule\nand ( 3) collaborating with parents. The impact is that greater emphasis is being placed on the early years of a child's life and the involvement of parents in the schools.  K-3 Summer Supplemental Instruction Program Act 1139 of 1993 provides for Supplemental Summer School Instruction for students in grades K-3 whose performance is below grade level in reading and math. The impact is that all students performing below grade level will have the opportunity to have extended learning experiences with a 12 students to one teacher ratio.  K -3 Staff Development One-week staf development training to support the Early Childhood/Primary Initiative was offered statewide to teachers in the summer of 1993. Enrollment in the K-3 Staff Development Training or the K-4 Crusade is required of summer school teachers. Staff Development Training sessions will continue during the spring of 1994. The impact is that all teachers teaching in summer school must participate in a state developed one week workshop or the K-4 crusade training. This 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I training has been specifically developed to integrate the teaching of reading, math and science.  Statewide Systemic Initiative (SSI) The Statewide Systemic Initiative provides training and materials to Arkansas teachers. Under the SSI, the K-4 Crusade, a joint effort of the ADE and the ADHE, provides two avenues of training for teachers of the Supplemental Summer School. In addition to the K-3 Staff Development described previously, the K-4 provides graduate courses in integrated math, science and reading instruction. The Math Crusade is now providing, and the Science Crusade will provide, beginning in the fall of 1994, training in hands-on math and science instruction for fifth grade through college teachers. In addition to training, materials are provided to teachers in each of the Crusades. Funding is from a National Science Foundation Grant and the State. The goal of tl,e Crusades is to reach every teacher in Arkansas within the next five years.  Multi-cultural Reading and Thinking (McRAT) A two-year staff development program offered to all Arkansas teachers, McRAT is currently in use in over 1000 classrooms in the state. Instruction uses multi-cultural literature as a basis for instruction in four categories of thinking skills. All costs tb districts and teachers are covered by a grant from the ADE. Although participation in the program statewide has been strong, participation of the Districts has been limited. Eight Little Rock and North Little Rock teachers (of a total of 359 statewide) are currently in the first year of training. A limited number of area teachers has previously received McRAT training. Available data document student progress in thinking skills and are available for sub-population. (G/T, race, gender, Chapter 1) . Equity emphasized that, owing to the success and cost-effectiveness of the McRAT Program in addressing both the need for multi-cultural education and providing successful reading instruction for minority students, the ADE should offer McRAT as a resource in meeting the objectives of reducing student achievement disparities in the Pulaski County districts. The impacts are: (1) McRAT increases higher order thinking and writing achievement of all students regardless of achievement levels, gender, race or socio-economic factors. ( 2) Applying thinking skills to the development of multi-cultural concepts across the curriculum increases understanding and appreciation of differences among individuals and groups within our society.  Incentive Schools The seven Little Rock Incentive Schools are elementary school attended predominantly by black children. Those schools have many enhancements, 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I including programs, activities, personnel, equipment and double funding. However, during the 1992-93 school year all schools showed a decrease in enrollment. The impact .:. this intervening event is that the ADE must determine why parents and students eagerly wait in line to attend one of the magnet schools while incentive school enrollment steadily declines. Additionally, the ADE must compare test scores of black students in regular schools, magnet school and incentive school to determine what instructional programs successfully close the disparity gap in academic achievement between black and white students. Part II A. Goals and Objectives Linked to Legal Obligations The ADE has developed goals and objectives aimed at monitoring and evaluating the Districts' progress during the Implementation Phase and at assisting the Districts in designing and developing programs to address effectively the disparities in academic achievement between black and white students in the Districts. The ADE has also specifically identified, described, and defined legal obligations in the Settlement Agreement and the 1989 Mon'toring Plan. Each goal and objective of the Implementation Plan is then linked to the legal obligations. I. Financial Obligations Legal Obligation: The ADE has made financial commitments to the Districts for Magnet Schools, Minority Incentive Payments, Magnet and M-to-M transportation, compensatory education, and in ieu of formula payments. Additionally, the ADE has financial commitments to the LRSD for up to a $20 million loan, to the PCS SD for scheduled payments, to NLRSD for special education payments, to the Magnet Review Committee and to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Finance and Administration Section, the ADE will make timely and accurate payments from the Public School Fund Budget to the three Districts, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), and the Magnet Review Committee. A. Magnet Funding Objective Make magnet payments to the Districts on a monthly basis from August through June of each school year. 1. MFPA Calculation 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Legal Obligation Include each District's magr12t stude:r:.ts in the calcda:.:or. cf that District's table rate, when dete,:mining eac~i District's MFPA. Key Activities a. Through Vivian Roberts of the Loc.-:.l Fisc~1l Services Office, use the previous year's three-quarter 8Verage daily membership to calculate MFPA for the c1.F\nc~,.t school year. b. Through Vivian Rober-ts of the Local Fiscal Ser-v\n.cGs Office, include ali Magnet students in tho residcl1.t District's average daily me:r..bership for calculation. c. Through lvfo.r.geS haw of the Ge::1.erai Financ _ Of'ficc, process and distribute state fvlFPA. 2. Magnet Operational Cho.rge Legal Obligatio\n1 Pay LRSD the Magnet operational ch,,rge for each tucient attending 8 magnet school in the District. Key Activities a. b. c. d. Through 1 'ancy Hall of the Local Fiscal Services Office, determine the number of Magnet students rc,siding in each District and attending a Mag 1.et School. Determination is made from t:1e Quarterly Attendance Reports riled by the Districts. Dete:cmins the Magnet operational char-g8 for che school year from the Court. The Leg2.l. S2rvices Oi'fice reports this information to the Local Fiscal Services Office. Thr-ot 1.gh Nancy Ha:1 of the Loc\u0026amp;l F:.scal Scrviu,s Otfi~c, calculate the state aid due tl-,e Little Rock ::\nc:joGl Di.strict. rTI11ou.gll1Y 1argeS h_a\\l\\lc f tl1e Jer\n_e::-:nFl i11unc'.\"O3 ffi.ce 1 process and distribute magn3~ oper\u0026amp;cional f\\n,.di'.1\nchec ,\n:s. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Majority-to-Minority (M-to-M) Incentive Payments Legal Obligation Pay District M-to-M Incentive payments as described by the August 26, 1986, stipulation agreement. Objective Make M-to-M payments to the three Districts from September through June of each school year. Key Activities a. b. Through Nancy Hall of the Local Fiscal Services Office, calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school District is entitled. Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks to the Districts. C. Magnet Review Committee Expenses Legal Obligation Make annual payments to the Magnet Review Committee Objective Make a payment of $75,000 to the Magnet Review Committee on July 1 oi each year. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute check to the Magnet Review Committee. D. Magnet and M-to-M Transportation Legal Obligations Pay for the actual costs of transporting Magnet and M-to--M students. . Objective Pay the Districts for the actual costs of transporting Magnet and M-to-M students. 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Key Activities a. b. c. d. e. At the beginning of the school year, the Districts submit an estimated budget to Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor. Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, the ADE pays the Districts for the first two-thirds of their proposed budget during the first half of the school year. Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, notifies Susan Ferguson of the General Finance Office to make the first two payments to the Districts representing two-thirds of the proposed budget. Before the final one-third payment is made to the Districts, the Districts present an itemized list of actual expenditures to Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor. Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, verifies the expenditures and reviews the bill with each District's Transportation Coordinator. Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, presents the final bill to the Legal Services Office for review. f. Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, notifies Susan Ferguson of the General Finance Office to pay the Districts for their actual expenditures. g. Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute the transportation aid for Magnet and M-to-M students. Objective: Reduce redundancy in transportation efforts and provide more efficient transportation service to students. Key Activities a. Schedule a meeting with the Interdistrict Transportation Authority to present two proposed alternative plans: Plan 1 Hire an IT A Director that will work with the three Districts on a daily basis to maximize services and costs\nand, Plan 2 Determine if one District would be willmg to be responsible for routing buses for the Magnet and M-to-M Transportation Program. 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b. c. Make a decision on the proposed plans and begin implementation Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleet and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. A Proposed Bus Replacement Rotation Chart is attached as Exhibit A. E. Attorney's Fees Advancement to LRSD (complete) F. LRSD Payments 1. Compensatory Education Legal Obligation Make payments to LRSD for compensatory education and other desegregation expenses. Objective Make the payment to LRSD as established on page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute the checks. 2. In Lieu of Formula Payments Legal Obligation Make additional payments to LRSD in lieu of formula guarantees. Objective Make the payments required on page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute checks. 3. Loan Legal Obligation Provide loans to LRSD of not more than $20,000,000 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Objective Make the loan to LRSD as required by pages 24-27 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activities a. LRSD presents a promissory note in the amount of their loan request to the ADE. b. Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute checks. G. PCS SD Payments 1. Scheduled Payments Legal Obligation Make scheduled payments to PCSSD Objective Make the payments required on page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute checks. 2. In Lieu of Formula Payments Legal Obligation Make additional payments to PCS SD in lieu of formula guarantees. Objective Make the payments required on page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute checks. H. NLRSD Payments 1. Compensatory Education Payments Legal Obligation Make compensatory education payments to NLRSD. 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II. Objective Make the payments required on page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activity Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute checks. 2. Special Education Payments Legal Obligation Make special education payments to NLRSD. Objective Make the payments required on pages 31-35 of the Settlement Agreement. Key Activities a. b. c. NLRSD sends correspondence to the ADE Local Fiscal Services Office indicating the number of children being served in special education in the District. Barry Kincl, Coordinator in the Local Fiscal Services Office, forwards this correspondence to Clent Holly in the Special Education Section for his review. Clent Holly of the Special Education Section reviews the correspondence and verifies the number of students served in special education and the number of students placed in regular education programs. He then recommends payment of a specific amount to the NLRSD to the General Finance and Administration Section. d. Through Marge Shaw of the General Finance Office, process and distribute the check. Staff Development Release Days (complete) III. Prohibition of Punitive Action Legal Obligation: The ADE shall take no punitive action against foe Districts. Goal: On an ongoing basis, as monitored by the Director, the ADE will take no punitive action aganst the Districts. 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Monitoring Compensatory Education Legal Obligation: The ADE shall monitor the implementation of compensatory education programs by the Districts and provide regular written monitoring reports to the parties and the Court. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the School Improvement, Federal Programs, Finance and Administration, Accountability and Equity Sections, the ADE will develop and implement Compensatory Education monitoring instruments and systems and evaluate their effectiveness. Objectives 1. 2. 3. By July, 1994, adapt and install the AD E's COE School Improvement Plan program for use as the monitoring instrument for compensatory education programs developed and funded by the Districts with the desegregation funding by the State. By January, 1995, test and evaluate the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data are appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. By May, 1995, using the Extended COE School Improvement Plan program as the monitoring instrument and system, prepare AD E's first monitoring report. V. Statement of Support for the Plans (complete) VI. A Petition for Election for LRSD will be suppor ed should a millage be required. Legal Obligation: T.b.e State will join LRSD if LRSD petitions the Court to allow it to hold a millage election. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Director and the State Board of Education, the ADE will join LRSD in requesting the Court to allow LRSD to hold a special millage election. Objectives 1. 2. Monitor Court Pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VII. Repeal of Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation Legal Obligation: The ADE shall seek repeal of legislation which impedes desegregation and seeks repeal or modification of regulations impeding desegregation. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Legal Services Office, Accountability, Equity, the State Board of Education, and the Legislature, the ADE will research and list laws that impede desegregation and submit proposals to the Legislature to repeal the laws. The ADE wili ask the State Board of Education to repeal or modify regulations that impede desegregation. Objectives 1. Using acollaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 2. 3. Key Activities a. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations to identify those that appear to impede desegregation. b. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement, that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. By November, 1994, the ADE will submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. By January, 1995, the ADE will submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. VIII. Elimination of State Funding for the Pulaski County Education Service Cooperative (complete) Elimination of State funding for the Pulaski County Education Service Cooperative has occurred. Action is complete for this legal obligation in that the Cooperative has been disbanded and the funding previously allocated to the Cooperative has been redirected to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM). 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IX. X. Commitment to Principles Legal Obligation: The ADE shall remain committed to remediating racial academic achievement disparities for Arkansas students, to have special education and gifted and talented classes which are not racially identifiable, to work cooperatively to promote the desegregation goals of the State and the districts and to insure education excellence. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the State Board of Education and all ADE sections, the ADE will remain committed to the principles outlined in the Settlement Agreement, and ADE will work toward the development and implementation of procedures and programs to see that this will enable the following principles to be met: A. B. c. Remediation of Racial Academic Achievement Disparities Special Education and Gifted and Talented Classes should not be Racially Identifiable Promotion of Desegregation Goals of the State and Educational Excellence Objectives 1. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 2. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 3. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's project management tool, and scrutiny of Remediation results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. Legal Obligation: The ADE will develop and search for programs to remediate achievement disparities between black and white students. 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I XI. Goal: The ADE, on an ongoing basis, through the Extended COE process will assist in searching for programs and processes to assist the Districts in closing the disparity gap in academic achievement between black students and white students. Objectives 1. 2. 3. 4. Beginning in the Fall, 1994, through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education program will be identifi.....d. Beginning in the Fall, 1994, identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstance, of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. Key Activities a. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. b. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. Beginning in the Fall, 1994, solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. Beginning in the Fall, 1994, evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. Test Validation Legal Obligation: The ADE shall conduct periodic reviews of tests used to determine if s tu den ts' race, sex or culture adversely affect their test scores, and if bias is found, ADE shall modify test to eliminate bias. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Accountability Section, the . ADE will conduct periodic reviews of tests used in state to determine if students' race, gender, or culture adversely affect their test scores, modifying said tests if necessary for bias control. 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I .1 I I I I I XII. Objectives 1. Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or other monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. Key Activities a. b. C. d. e. By April, 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representatives of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee. By May, 1994, the bias review committee will research test validation issues and procedures. By July, 1994, the bias review committee will prepare and issue a nrequest for proposals\", soliciting proposals from qualified bias review services or experts. By September, 1994, the bias review committee will receive, review and evaluate proposals, conduct interviews as necessary and recommend a bias review service or expert for the assignment. By December, 1994, the ADE will negotiate and contract with the bias review service or expert and oversee the contractor's activities for evaluating the Stanford 8, and/ or other monitoring instruments. 2. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. In-Service Training Legal Obligation: The ADE shall establish in-service programs to assist in providing training for the staffs of desegregating school districts. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the leadership of the School . Improvement Section, the ADE will establish in-service training programs for staffs of desegregating school districts, increasing progress toward successful implementation of the Agreement. 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Objectives 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Beginning in March, 1994, identify in-service training needs of desegregating districts. Key Activity Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. Beginning in March, 1994, assess whether existing ADE or Educational Service Cooperative in-service training programs address the in-service training needs of desegregating districts, identifying subjects for new, or enhanced in-service training programs. Beginning in March, 1994, develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. Beginning in May, 1994, implement in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. Beginning in September, 1994, evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. XIII. Recruitment of Minority Teachers Legal Obligation: The ADE shall supply new teacher graduate information to the Districts upon notification of foreseeable shortage areas. The ADE shall seek to increase the pool of minority teachers available to the districts nd shall develop annual profiles of teachers by race, specialty, subject area and area of certification. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the teacher licensure unit of the Accountability Section, the ADE will create and maintain a database for identifying the supply of minority teacher education graduates. Objectives 1. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Key Activities 2. 3. a. b. c. d. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of each year, Districts will supply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subject area. Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request information from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minority-teacher graduates. Within 30 days of receiving the data from colleges and universities, the ADE will provide data to the Districts on teacher openings at the colleges and universities and data from colleges and universities on minority graduates. Each November, the ADE will request information from the Districts on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance, including an assessment of the minority teacher candidate database. e. Encourage ADHE to recruit minority students into teacher education and to recruit minority teacher aides into teacher edt cation. By September, 1994, assist Districts' efforts of minority-teacher recruitment at career days of each in-state college and university and at one out-of-state university. The AD E's career day assistance to the Districts will begin in March, 1994, and be provided on a full scale basis by September, 1994. Continue to maintain a database that includes data for all certified teachers in Arkansas, including their race and gender, and provide the data to Districts on a regular basis. XIV. Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates Legal Obligation: The ADE shall work with the Department of Higher Education to reduce any racial disparity that may exist in the distribution of existing scholarships and to secure passage of legislation to financially assist minority students attending Arkansas colleges and universities who commit to become teachers in Arkansas. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Lead Planner, the School Improvement and other sections, the ADE will assist the 24 I I I I I I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I Arkansas Department of Higher Education (ADHE) in identifying and analyzing any racial disparities that may exist in the allocation of scholarships and assist potential minority teacher candidates by assessing legislative programs and, if necessary, making legislative recommendations to improve existing programs. Objectives 1. 2. Beginning in April, 1994, and on an ongoing basis, assist ADHE in identifying, analyzing, addressing and eliminating racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. Key Activities a. b. C, Representatives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together, review ADHE's available data to identify racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. Using its knowledge about public schools, teacher education and certification, and through a collaborative effort with the Districts, ADE will analyze racial disparities in ADHE scholarship allocations. ADE will report its findings, conclusions and recommendations about racial d.isparities in allocating scholarships to ADHE. Working with the Department of Higher Education, ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. The ADE Lead Planner will be responsible and accountable for overseeing ADE's actions under this objective. By November, 1994, and on an ongoing basis, with the Department of Higher Education, assist minority students by evaluating existing laws that are intended to provide scholarship inc1.:\",~ives to minority students pursuing education degrees and proposing amendments to existing legislation, or new legislation, to address shortcomings of existing laws. Key Activities a. Representatives of the ADE and the Department of Higher Education will work together to identify and assess the impact of existing laws that were 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. intended to increase the number of minority graduates with teaching certificates. b. Working within the Executive Branch's policy development and legislation development process, ADE and Higher Education will propose legislative measures for reducing racial disparities in allocating scholarships. Beginning in April, 1994, and on an annual basis, monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the Department of Higher Education\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. XV. Minority Recruitment of ADE Staff Legal Obligation: The ADE will develop and implement a plan to identify jobs and consultant positions within the Department in which minorities are underrepresented and will recruit and employ minority applicants for those positions so as to create a balanced, desegregated staff at all levels. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Director and the State Board of Education, .the ADE will develop and implement an action plan to recruit minorities to the ADE, achieving better minority representation at all levels in the ADE. Objectives 1. Beginning March 15, 1994, administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE Staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education. 2. On an ongoing basis, monitor minority representation at all levels of the ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. XVI. School Construction Legal Obligation: The ADE will develop criteria for site selection of new schools, major school expansion and school closings. The ADE will require that a district applying to it for approval of new construction or major school expansion provide a desegregation impact statement. The ADE will not recommend or approve the site of any school in any county contiguous to Pulaski County if the construction or expansion of the school at the requested 26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I XVII. location of such school will have a substantial negative impact on any District's ability to desegregate. Goal: Within the first year of the Implementation Phase, through the Legal Services Office, Equity Office, and Finance and Administration Section, the ADE will review criteria for site selection of new schools, major school expansion and school closings, and uniformly and consistently recommend uniform standards and a well-defined site evaluation process. Objectives 1. 2. 3. Improve the effectiveness of the ADE's existing rules, regulations, and site evaluation form for assessing the desegregation impacts of school construction between school districts. Key Activity Review existing rules, regulations and site evaluation forms and their application to school construction projects within districts and between districts. Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses impacts on racial balances of individual school sites Within the three districts. Address shortcomings in existing rules, regulations and school improvement forms by developing and proposing changes to the State Board of Education and promulgating new rules and regulations through the State's Administrative Procedures process. Assist Pulaski County Special School District Legal Obligation: The ADE shall use its best efforts to work with appropriate colleges and universities to facilitate a special arrangement which would significantly reduce the cost of a black history program to PCSSD. Goal:. On an ongoing basis, through the Lead Planner and the Accountability Section, the ADE will work cooperatively with the Arkansas Department of Higher Education to reduce the costs of Black History offerings to the PCSSD certified staff. 27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Objectives 1. By March, 1994, determine if the PCSSD wants and needs assistance in lowering the costs of Black History course offerings to its certified staff. 2. By September, 1994, if PCSSD wants assistance, communicate with local colleges and universities to facilitate the Black History course offerings to PCSSD teachers at the lowest cost possible. XVIII. Scattered-Site Housing Legal Obligation: The ADE shall use its best efforts to influence appropriate state agencies to assist PCSSD in its efforts to promote and secure scattered site housing in PCS SD by securing and providing, to the extent feasible, state owned or controlled land suitable for such use. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through the Finance and Administration Section, the ADE will work with other state constitutional officers and state agencies to influence the location of scattered site housing on state-owned land in Pulaski County. Objectives 1. By April, 1994, through Executive Branch communication procedures, the ADE will inquire about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about the availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered-site housing. 2. By June, 1994, if State-owned land within Pulaski County is available for scattered-site housing, the ADE will refer information about the sites to the appropriate state and federal housing agencies. XIX. Standardized Test Selection to Determine LRSD Loan Forgiveness Legal Obligation: The ADE and LRSD shall agree upon a standardized te t to measure LRSD 1s students scores and determine whether the ADE1s loan to LRSD will or will not be forgiven. Goal: Through the Accountability Section, the Legal Services Office, and the Director's Office, the ADE will work with the LRSD to reach agreement on a standardized test to measure the District 1s progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. 28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Objective By April, 1994, meet with and propose to representatives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the District's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. XX. Monitor School Improvement Plt..ns Legal Obligation: The ADE shall monitor school improvement plans to determining progress toward achieving educational equity. Goal: On an ongoing basis, through tne School Improvement, Federal Programs, and Special Education Sections, the ADE will continue to monitor annual school improvement plans to determine progress toward achieving educational equity. Objectives 1. Fully implement the Extended COE School Improvement Plan process in all schools in the three Pulaski County school districts. 2. 3. 4. Conduct the Extended COE School Improvement Plan peer review process in 20% of the schools each year ( every school every 5 years) and provide peer review team recommendations to the schools reviewed. Receive from all schools, annual reports on progress toward meeting recommendations of School Improvement Plans. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. XXI. Data Collection Legal Obligation: The ADE shall collect data to provide information required by the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan Goal: On an ongoing basis, through all sections and offices, the ADE will collect, obtain, and furnish data called for in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. Objective Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. 29 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. Organization Key participants in the initiation and operation of the ADE Desegregation Implementation Plan include the State Board of Education, the ADE Director, the ADE Senior Management Team, the three person Oversight Group, an Implementation Phase Working Group, and the Monitoring Operations Team. In addition, the ADE will request that representatives of the Districts and the Intervenors collaborate in Implementation Phase activities. State Board of Education The role of the State Board of Education (Board) during the Implementation Phase is to make policies on Implementation Phase issues and to provide political leadership among state government agencies, the Legislature and state organizations and associations for implementing those policies. The Board has overall oversight responsibilities to ensure that the ADE is fulfilling its responsibilities and obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. Board Implementation Phase activities encompass receiving and reviewing monthly project management reports and receiving and acting on findings and recommendations addressing Implementation Phase Issues. In addition, Board members may choose to observe directly Implementation Phase activities and monitoring operations to see first hand how the Department is addressing its Implementation Phase responsibilities. Director I Arkansas Department of Education The Director of the Arkansas Department of Education reports to the Governor and to the State Board bf Education. The role of the Director during the Implementation Phase is to provide executive leadership and direction to the Department's Senior Management Team and any other Implementation Phase groups or committees. In addition, the Director will support Implementation Phase activities and operations by building collaborative relationships with other parties affecting the Department's successful and effective execution of the Implementation Plan. The responsibilities of the Director during the Implementation Phase encompass providing administrative leadership and supervision to the Lead Planner and the Department's Senior Management Team. In addition, the Director is responsible for directing and allocating departmental resources in accordance with approved budgets and operating plans necessary for the effective execution of the Implementation Pian. The Director receives, reviews and comments on monthly project management reports and ADE monitoring reports, and makes recommendations on Implementation Plan issues to the State Board of Education, to the Governor, and to the Legislature. ADE Senior Management Team Because execution of the Implementation Plan involves all o the ADE sections and offices, the Department's Senior Managers are key participants in the Implementation Phase. Their responsibilities as 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I individual managers include ensuring that resources within their organizational units are available and committed to fulfilling the Implementation Phase activities described in the Implementation Plan. Their responsibilities as members of the Departments' Senior Management Team involve providing the leadership and direction to assure that working relationships within the Department are conducive to effective execution of the Implementation Plan. ADE Desegregation Oversight Group The ADE Desegregation Oversight Group consists of the Lead Planner, the Desegregation Attorney, and the Internal Auditor. The Desegregation Oversight Group is responsible for coordinating and controlling the Implementation Phase and provides overall staff support to the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group and other groups and committees with Implementation Phase responsibilities. The Desegregation Oversight Group is responsible for preparing and submitting project management reports and ADE monitoring reports. Lead Planner. The Lead Planner is a member of the ADE Senior Management Team and reports directly to the ADE Director. The role of the Lead Planner during the Implementation Phase is to coordinate and control the execution of the Implementation Plan. The Lead Planner's responsibilities during the Implementation Phase encompass overall project management duties, including providing di\" ection for the Desegregation Oversight Group. The Lead Planner will chair the Department's Implementation Phase Working Group, operate the project management tool, prepare project management reports, and coordinate reports, findings and recommendations on Implementation Phase issues to the Director and the State Board of Education. Desegregation Attorney. The Desegregation Attorney functions as a staff attorney in the ADE Legal Services Office. The role of the Desegregation Attorney is to monitor all desegregation case court proceedings, The Desegregation Attorney's responsibilities encompass advising the Lead Planner, the ADE Legal Services Office, and the ADE Director on desegregation legal obligations and issues. Internal Auditor. The Internal Auditor reports to the Lead Planner. The role of the Internal Auditor is to assist the Lead Planner in controlling Implementation Phase activities. The Internal Auditor's responsibilities include conducting examinations and reviews of the ADE's execution of the Implementation Plan and fulfilling its responsibilities under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. ADE Implementation Phase. Working Group (Group). The ADE Implementation Phase Working Group will be chaired by the Lead Planner and will consist of representatives from ADE sections that have direct responsibility for Implementation Phase activities and operations. In addition, the ADE will invite other parties important to the execution of the Implementation Phase Working Group. Initially, the Group will be 31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I responsible for developing and installing the ADE's monitoring instrument and system. Staff support will be provided to the Group by the Lead Planner, Internal Auditor, and Desegregation Attorney. The Group will be scheduled to meet regularly to review actual progress against planned activities, to coordinate Implementation Phase activities within the ADE and to collaborate with ADE, the Districts, and the other parties. The Group will review ADE's monthly project management tool reports and ADE's monitoring reports prior to their being submit ed to the ADE Director, the State Board of Education, and the Court. ADE Monitoring Operations Team (Team). This will be the group within the ADE that will conduct the Department's Implementation Phase Monitoring Operations. Its operating responsibilities are described in the Monitoring Operations section of the Implementation Plan. The ADE will invite representatives of other parties to participate in its monitoring operations and to be included on the Team. Some members of the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group described above will also function as members of the Team. Part III A. Description of Monitoring Operations This section of the Implementation Plan describes ADE's selection of \"Extended COE\" as the Department's monitoring instrument and process for meeting the Department's obligations and responsibilities under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. In addition, this section includes a description of AD E's monitoring operations, a detailed description of how.monitoring, evaluating, and reporting activities will be coordinated with other agencies, and a description of the process and criteria ADE will use to evaluate the effectiveness of its own implementation plan as it unfolds. Selection of monitoring instrument and process During the Development Phase, ADE considered its ongoing monitoring instruments and processes and assessed them for applicability to the Department's obligations and responsibilities under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. Several ADE sections monitor schools and school districts using monitoring instruments and processes required by respective state and federal programs. Some of these monitoring and reporting processes and school improvement efforts include Equity, Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, Special Education, Child Nutrition, Vocational, Restructuring, Diamond School Initiative, Break the Mold Schools, Curriculum Frameworks, performance on norm-referenced tests, state education goals and national education goals. In addition, the Department administers the Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation\" (COE) process which has been installed in Arkansas schools at the rate of 20% per year since 1989-90, which was the pilot year for the program. 32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Through this examination, the Desegregation Working Team determined that none of ADE's in-place, on-going monitoring and school improvement efforts would fulfill the Department's obligations and responsibilities under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. However, the Team determined that of all the Department's existing efforts, the COE process most nearly accomplished the monitoring requirements and obligations described in the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. The COE provides a base, or platform, for developing its monitoring instrument and process for meeting the Department's obligations and responsibilities described in the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plari. The monitoring instrument and process will be referred to as \"Extended COE\". Overview of the Arkansas Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation The Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation ( COE) is a process used by the Arkansas Department of Education to assemble objective data describing schools, to engage everyone involved with each school in the appraisal of existing school program disparities, and to create and execute plans for the resolution of inequities and issues revealed through examination of information. Elements of the Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation 1. Assembly of data 2. 3. a. b. c. Archival (student behavior, tardiness, drop-out, suspension, retention and absenteeism rate\nteacher profiles, subpopulation divisions) data are accumulated. Perceptual (impressions of teachers, students and parents concerning school program) data. Student achievement data Program appraisal The faculty, students and parents analyze information to draw conclusions, especially concerning disparities between subpopulations (by gender, ethnicity, behavioral patterns, etc.) Mobilization A plan is developed by the information analysts to solve problems, reduce disparities, improve curriculum and produce improvements. Exhibit C describes the ADE's current COE process and describes each of the above elements. Monitoring Once every five years, a Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation ( COE) is supervised by a field service specialist who orients all the participants in a school's COE process and meets, as required, with subcommittees and 33 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I individuals delegated to accomplish incidental tasks associated with gathering information, analyzing data, creating problem solving strategies, and executing the steps of the school's five-year improvement plan. In addition, the school prepares one-year and three-year updates to the fiveyear plan which are submitted to the field service specialist as notice of continued activity and progress. Exhibit D describes a schools preparation for a COE visit and what occurs during a COE visit. Exhibit E is a guideline for a school's responses to recommendations made by the visiting team, and the COE analysis instrument provides a broad view of the COE process undertaken by the school. Outcomes The school develops a planning document for a program that is site based (determined by and advocated by participants), data driven (predicated on valid information), research oriented (neffective schooln research shows a number of critical areas--clear school purpose, instructional leadership, high expectations, student achievement, parent and community involvement, school climate, time on task/opportunity to learn--that may lead to more successful results) . Advantages of COE Use as ADE1s Monitoring Instrument and Process 1. COE School Improvement Planning is based on neffective schools researchu that emphasizes learner outcomes. 2. 3. 4. 5. COE School Improvement efforts are school-based. Data collection and analysis are done at the school-site level, closest to the students. The school-based process empowers educators to identify and address disparities in student achievement. A data collection and monitoring framework is in place. COE materials include extensive formats for data collection. Use of COE would not add another data collection burden to teachers and administrators. COE School Improvement Plans identify school-based needs for ADE assistance. In-service training and orientation packages and processes are well developed. Disadvantages of the COE Process for Use as ADE1s Monitoring Instrument and Process 1. As presently constructed, the COE School Improvement leaves target areas _to be addressed to the discretion of the school. If the data analysis is flawed, if data are ignored, o if site-based priorities do not address critical student learning outcomes, the process does not provide ADE access to intervene. In Pulaski County, most schools engaged in the COE process have not incorporated equity issues, or their desegregation plans into their 34 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. 3. 4. COE School Improvement Plans. District representatives explain that schools have viewed the COE and desegregation planning as separate. The AD E's Desegregation Working Team and District representatives agree that the school-based COE School Improvement Plan and school-based desegregation plans must be merged. \"Extended COE\" must require that in their School Improvement Plans, schools collect and analyze equity data and address desegregation issues, including reducing disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. As presently operated, once School Improvement Plans are completed, reviewed, and recommendations made by the COE Site Visitation Committee, the AD E's support system has not been adequate to assist schools in the implementation of their School Improvement Plans. \"Extended COE\" must provide a mechanism to ensure support for implementation of School Improvement Plans. In all areas of Arkansas except Pulaski County, educational services cooperatives are one source of support. The ADE and the Districts must collaborate during the Implementation Phase to restore services and functions once provided by the county's educational service cooperative. As presently operated, the COE process is a cyclical, five-year process. The School Improvement Plan is produced over a period of two to four semesters, the plan is reviewed by a site visitation team and recommendations are made for changes, or enhancements to the Plan. Schools prepare one-year and three-year updates which are submitted to ADE field specialists. \"Extended COE\" must provide data for monitoring reports and plan results must be considered and assessed on an annual basis. As presently constituted, the COE process does not incorporate other ADE school improvement efforts. Therefore, school staffs are beset with several different ADE requirements, monitoring procedures, and uncoordinated site visits. The ADE has a goal, to merge its various and separate school improvement efforts into the \"Extended COE\" process. Proposed COE Adaptations. The following outline lists proposed adaptations to the present !=OE process to establish an \"Extended COE\" process that will meet the Department's obligations and responsibilities under the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan: 1. Review and update the current COE data collection packet to ensure consistency. 35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.  Incorporate or fold in the specific information required through the equity office.  Review software database systems for possible widespread implementation to provide processes for continual data collection/ disaggregation. Review and adjust current time line requirements to ensure consistency.   Adequate staff development time is a necessity at the building level to provide maximum success probability. Appropriate training must be initiated for the ADE staff and the faculties of the school Districts. Maximum possible technical assistance is an absolute necessity. A determination of appropriate training for schools at various stages of school improvement activities is a must. Examples might be: Equity Guidelines Data Collection/Disaggregation High Expectations for All Students Group Processes/Dynamics Brainstorming/Environmental Scan Research Activities Outcome Creation Mission Provide a current educational bibliography as necessary to foster student success.  Establish a computerized database within the ADE to provide assistance to the three school Districts Establish a \"success\" criteria throughout all stages of the school improvement process. Keeping in mind that some schools are in the latter stages of their original process. The monitoring process should meet the criteria as it relates to those schools.  Assure that proper data are collected and analyzed.   Ensure appropriate subpopulations (recognizing disparity) have been identified and activities designed to meet the needs of those specifjc groups. (Incorporate Equity Guidelines.) Provide processes for continual evaluation of data and specific activities. Link the success criteria of school improvement activities to continued school accreditation. 36 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Enfold the various school reports/activities that are currently being reported separately under -the \"umbrella\" of school improvement processes.  Equity  Special Education  Gifted/Talented  Compensatory Education  Federal Programs  Others Review the COE visiting team process to look for improvement areas.    Expanding the time Expanding the team Reviewing the number of visits and where they should occur in the process Review the actual hard copy format of the school improvement plan submitted by the schools.  Include other items such as more data summaries, etc. Review and refine the reaction/acceptance process to visiting team recommendations submitted back to the school.  Research based recommendations  Rationale of school failing to incorporate recommendations  Follow-up by ADE Review target/outcome possibilities for each building.  Should mandates be included?  Are the selected targets, outcomes, and actions reflective of disparities indicated through collected data? To implement the proposed monitoring process, the ADE has committed the following :  Ensure the realignment of staff needed  Hire additional staff who will have oversight responsibilities for the monitoring process  Install technology needed to facilitate the process Development and installation of the \"Extended COE\" monitoring instrument and process! Between March 15, 1994, and July 31, 1994, the AD E's Implementation Phase Working Group, including the Districts and other parties, (see Organization) will refine the proposed COE adaptations described above and develop new training manuals and orientation materials for \"Extended COE.\" Exhibits C, D and E will be modified during this time period to make the necessary adaptations and new instruments will be created to fulfill the AD E's obligations. 37 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Extended COE will be installed into the remaining 2090 of schools in Pulaski County that have not engaged in the COE School Improvement Process. Inservice training on Extended COE will be provided to teachers and administrators of these schools during the summer, 1994, and preparation of the Extended COE School Improvement Plans will commence with the fall semester. For those schools already engaged in the COE School Improvement Process, the adaptations for \"Extended COE\" will be provided and incorporated into existing and ongoing COE School Improvement Plans. In-service training on Extended COE will be provided to teachers and administrators of these schools after training for the initial group. Monitoring operations. ADE monitoring operations will occur at school sites, District offices and at ADE offices. Monitoring operations will be conducted by ADE personnel including the ADE Desegregation Oversight Group (see Organization) and the ADE Monitoring Operations Team. ADE's Monitoring Operations Team will consist of a core group of approximately 15 persons from several different ADE sections who now constitute one of the Department's \"expanded teams\". Team members will participate in the development and installation of Extended COE and will be trained to support its implementation. Extended COE monitoring operations will be guided at the school-site level by ADE Field Specialists, who will also chair the Extended COE site visitation groups. Extended COE site visitation groups will be formed by and scheduled at school sites by the ADE Field Specialists. Members of school site visitation groups will vary depending upon the special - characteristics and needs of each school\nhowever, each school site visitation group will include several members of the ADE Monitoring Operations Team as well as -invited representatives of the Districts, and other parties. A committee of the Desegregation Working Team has, during the Development Phase, compared the data described in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan, with data collected and analyzed through the COE process and provides the following accounting: The following information is specifically in reference to the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. *This information will refer to committee recommendations of how /where the school improvement process will address each area through the Extended COE Process. Reference page 4: 1. Evidence that policies, procedures, rules and regulations are developed and implemented to facilitate desegregation.  Schools will review, on an annual basis, all of these items through the review of archival data. 38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.  3.  4.  5.  6.  ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that plans related to reducing achievement disparity between black and non-black students are progressively successful. Schools will review, on an annual basis, all of these items through archival data. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that student assignments to schools, classes and programs at each organizational level are made without bias. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival and achievement data as relevant to this item. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that staff development days authorized as a result of the Agreement are used to facilitate the desegregation process. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival database on their staff development evaluations. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that travel time to and from schools is not disproportionate among black and non-black students and the percentage of black students transported for desegregation is not significantly greater than the percentage of non-black students transported for desegregation. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival and achievement data based on a cross reference of transportation schedules, school assignments, and achievement data. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process.  Evidence that guidance and counseling is designed to meet the needs of a diverse student population. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival and perceptual data in relation to the minimum required standards, established. criteria for accessibility and the incorporation of specific site plans for their additional obligations. 39 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.  8.  9.  10.  11.  12. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence of internal procedures for ensuring that materials for appraising or counseling students is non-discriminatory. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival data concerning their internal procedures to assure for non-discrimination. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that curricular content and instructional strategies are utilized to meet the diverse needs of the student population served. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival and achievement data. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that personnel is recruited, employed and assigned in a manner to meet the goals of a desegregation school district. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival data which would include a review of district policies concerning recruitment. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that procedures related to extracurricular and cocurricular activities are developed and implemented to identify and eliminate conditions that result in participation that is disproportionate to the student population. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival data on extracurricular and curricular activities. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence of diverse representation on appointed district wide and school-based committees. Schools will review, on an annual basis, archival data that shows represen~ation or_i such committees. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence of efforts to ensure that parent attendance at school functions is not disproportionate to the student population. 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I  13.  14.  Schools will review, on an annual basis, through archival data, the representation at school functions of parental attendance as compared to student population. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence of success related to Majority to Minority transfers. Schools will review, on an annual basis, the archival and achievement data. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Evidence that magnet schools are an effective inter-district remedy for racial balance. Schools will review, on an annual basis, the archival data at building level and compare district wide and county wide data. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process.  Reference page 5 : A. Enrollment/ Attendance  Schools will review on an annual basis through archival data, items 1, 2, and 3. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. B. Test Data  C.  Schools will review on an annual basis through achievement data, items 1 through 5. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Staff Schools will review on an annual basis through archival data, items 1 through 8. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. 41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D.  Policy and Program Information Schools will review on an annual basis archival data to include district and building policies. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. E. Budget Information (New information for Extended COE)  F.  G.  H.  Schools will be required to collect archival data on items 1 through 5, at the building level and compare this county wide. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Student Discipline Schools will review on an annual basis archival and achievement data on students receiving disciplinary actions. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Perceptual Data Schools will conduct surveys to collect perceptual data on the three selected groups--staff, parents, and students. ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. Majority to Minority Transfer Schools will review on an annual basis the archival data . ADE will monitor according to established criteria for the Extended COE Process. The review of applicable data will include cooperative efforts of the involved districts and the Department of Education. Appropriate technical assistance will be provided by the ADE in these efforts. The review of annual data will assist in evaluation of successes generated from school improvement activities directed toward specific outcomes. Assessment of strategy successes and failures will determine if specific actions need to be enhanced, continued as is, or dropped from current activities. These revision activities will become part of the monitoring process with reports generated to appropriate parties and will involve 42 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I those schools who have completed the initial COE process. Processes will include adapting current COE activities to better parallel the \"Extended COE\" Monitoring Process. Monitoring Reports. The May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan requires ADE to submit semiannual monitoring reports initially and establishes July 15 and February 1 (or the nearest workday) each year as scheduled reporting dates. Since the Extended COE process is being developed and installed between March 15, 1994, and July 31, 1994, the ADE will not be prepared to submit a monitoring report on July 15, 1994. The AD E's first full monitoring report will be made on July 15, 1995. However, the ADE will be prepared to make an interim monitoring report on February 1, 1995. The ADE will be submitting monthly project management reports and in those reports will describe the status of monitoring operation and may preview issues being raised through its monitoring process prior to making its interim monitoring report on February 1, 1995, or its full monitoring report on July 15, 1995. Description of the process for evaluating and reporting monitoring results. The ADE Desegregation Oversight Group with the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group are responsible for evaluating and reporting monitoring results. The Oversight Group is responsible for compiling monitoring information from the Extended COE schools and providing reports and recommendations to the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group. As the monitoring process progresses, the ADE will obtain input from interested parties a_s well as technical assistance from outside the Department for evaluating its monitoring results. Description of how monitoring, evaluating, and reporting activities will be coordinated with other agencies. The ADE intends for its monitoring operation to be inclusive of other parties and agencies. Other parties and agencies, including representatives of the Districts and the Intervenors, will be invited to participate in Extended COE site visits and will be invited to serve on the Implementation Phase Working Group and any other ad hoc groups that are organized to address issues related to the Settlement Agreement and the May 31, 1989, Monitoring Plan. Description of the process and criteria ADE will use to evaluate the effectiveness of its own implementation plan as it unfolds. The fundamental principle of the COE process is \"all students will learn\". The benchmarks described in Section One of this Implementation Plan provide an educational framework wherein, \"all students will learn\". Through its implementation plan, the APE will assist schools in reducing disparities in academic achievement between white students and black students by identifying circumstances and conditions that impede learning and by identifying circumstances and conditions that impede learning and by identifying learning resources and programs that succeed. 43 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of ADE's Implementation Plan are tied directly to how well disparities in academic achievement are reduced and whether all students in the Pulaski County schools are learning. The process for evaluating the effectiveness of the ADE Implementation Plan is the monitoring operations process itself. B. Timelines of Key Activities between March 15, 1994, and June 30, 1995 KEY ADE OFFICE BEGINNING ENDING DATE ACTIVITIES DATE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: Use the Local Fiscal Middle of each Last day of previous year's Services, Vivian month, August - each month, three quarter Roberts June August - June average daily membership to calculate MFPA for the current school year Include all Local Fiscal Middle of each Last day of Magnet Services, Vivian month, August - each month, Students in the Roberts June August - June resident District's average daily membership for calculation Process and General Middle of each Last day of distribute State Finance, Marge month, August - each month, MFPA Shaw June August - June Determine the Local Fiscal Middle of each Last day of number of Services, Nancy month, August - each month, Magnet students Hall June August - Jun~ residing in each District and attending a Magnet School 44 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Legal Office reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet operational charge Process and distribute state for Magnet Operational Charge Calculate the amount of M-to- M incentive money to which each school district is entitled I\u0026gt;rocess and distribute M-to- M incentive checks Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to- M transporta,tion budget to ADE Legal Services March 15, 1994 Ongoing, as Office, Sheila ordered by the Freeman Court Local Fiscal Middle of each Last day of Services, Nancy month, August - each month, Hall June August - June General Middle of each Last day of Finance, month, August - each month, Marge Shaw June August - June Local Fiscal Middle of each Last day of Services, Nancy month, August - each month, Hall June August - June General Middle of each Last day of Finance, month each month, Marge Shaw September- June General July 1 of each Ongoing Finance, year Marge Shaw Submitted to September of Ongoing, Reginald Wilson, each year December of Pulaski County each year Program Monitor :45 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator Reginald Wilson presents final bill to Legal Office for review Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay the Districts for their actual expenditures Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two thirds of the Districts' proposed budget Reginald Wilson, After Districts Ongoing Pulaski County submit budget annually Program Monitor General After Districts Ongoing Finance, submit budget annually Marge Shaw 'Reginald Wilson, Annually, as Ongoing, Pulaski County final bills are annually Program Monitor submitted by Districts - Elizabeth Annually Ongoing, Boyter, Legal annually Assistant to the Director Reginald Wilson, Annually Ongoing Pulaski County annually Program Monitor\nSusan Ferguson, General Finance Reginald Wilson, After Districts Ongoing, Pulaski County submit budget annually Program Monitor 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget Schedule a meeting with the ITA to present the ADE's alternative plans Make a decision on the proposed plans and begin implementation Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleet and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to- M Transportation needs Process and distribute transportation aid to the Districts for Magnet and M-to- M transportation General After Districts Ongoing Finance, Marge submit budget annually Shaw Spence Holder, March 15, 1994 March 16, 1994 Transportation Coordinator and Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor Spence Holder, March 15, 1994 March 25, 1994 Transportation Coordinator, Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, Gene Wilhoit, Director Spence Holder, March 15, 1994 Ongoing as Transportation stated in Coordinator, Exhibit A Reginald Wilson, Pulaski County Program Monitor, Gene Wilhoit, Director General Annually Ongoing, Fin\u0026amp;nce, Marge annually Shaw 47 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by page 28 of the Settlement Agreement Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement General 15 days before Payment due Finance, Marge payment due date and ending Shaw date January 1, 1999 General 15 days before Payment due Finance, Marge payment due date and ending Shaw date July 1, 1995 General When requested Ongoing, Finance, Marge by LRSD through June Shaw 30, 1995 General 15 days before Payment due Finance, payment due date and ending Marge Shaw date July 1, 1994 General 15 days before Payment due Finance, Mar\ne payment due date and ending Shaw July 1, 1995 48 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement Review NLRSD's request for additional payments in accordance with pages 31-35 of the Settlement Agreement and recommend payment Process and distribute payments required by pages 31 - 35 of the Settlement Agreement General Finance, Marge Shaw Special Education, Clent Holly General Finance, Marge Shaw II 15 days before July 1 of each payment due school year date through June 30, 1996 As requested by Annually until NLRSD ADE pays NLRSD $1,276,825 or formula expires When Special Ongoing until Education ADE pays requests NLRSD payment $1,276,825 or formula expires 49 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING COMP EN SA-TORY EDUCATION: Begin adapting and installing the ADE's Extended COE School Improvement Plan for use as the monitoring instrument for compensatory education programs developed and funded by the Districts which the desegregation funding by the State Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data are appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students Bob Maddox, April, 1994 July, 1994 James Hester, Bob Kerr, Oversight Auditor, Vicki Gray, Andre Guerrero Bob Maddox, August, 1994 January 15, James Hester, 1995 Bob Kerr, Oversight Auditor, Vicki Gray, Andre Guerrero I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Use the Extended COE School Improvement Plan program as the monitoring instrument and system to prepare ADE's first monitoring report A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED: Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election Lead Planner, February 1995 May 1995 Emma Bass, Bob Shaver, Rodger Callahan, Oliver Dillingham, Sheila Freeman April, 1994 Ongoing Sheila Freeman April, 1994 Ongoing 51 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REPEAL ST A TUT ES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGA-TION: Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation: a. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations to identify those that appear to impede desee:reira tion. b. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement, that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desee:ree:a tion Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those reg-ulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desee:regation Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 November, 1994 Oliver Dillingham Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 November, 1994 Oliver Dillingham Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 November, 1994 Oliver Dillingham Lead Planner, November, 1994 Ongoing Ray Lumpkin, Oliver Dillingham 52 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Submit proposals to the Legisia tu~e for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to deseg-1egation COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES: Through a preamble to the Implemen ation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm i s commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles Through execution of the Implementation Pian, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm ts commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results Gene Wilhoit, January 1995, Ongoh1g State Board of and oagoing Education I Gene Wilhoit, Ma:.ch 15, 1994 O1,going State Boa1d of Education I I State Board of March 15, 1994 Ongoing Education I ' j I 53 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Through regular oversight o~ the Implementat::.oa Phase's project management tool, and scrutiny of results of AD::::'s actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Ac,:reement REMEDIATI01 T: Th::::-ough the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensa to:cy education program will be identified. State Board cf March 15, 1994 Ongoing Education I I i i I I I Lead Planner, Fall, 1994 Ongoing Bob Maddox, James Hester I - 54 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstance of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. a. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensa-::ory education programs. b. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organization such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. Lead Planner, Fall, 1994 Ongoing Bob Maddox, James Hester, Oliver Dillingham I Maxine Lewis April, .:_994 Ongoing Oliver Summer, 1994 Ongoing Dillingham I I 55 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance Lead Planner, Fall, 1994 I Ongoing I Area V Expanded Team I Lead Planner, Fall, 1994 Ongoing Area V K'panded Team 56 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TEST VA LIDA TION: Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or other monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. a. By April 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representative of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee b. By May, 1994, the bias review committee will research test validation  issues anci procedures. !I Rodger Callahan May, 1!384 1 ~:i.rch , 1995 I I 1! Rodger Callahan April, 1994 Ongoing I Rodger Callahan May, 1994 May 30, 1994 Ii i I 57 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I c. By July, 1994, the bias review committee will prepare and issue a nrequest for proposals\", soliciting proposals from qualified bias review services or experts. d. By September 1994, the bias review committee will receive, review and evaluate proposals, conduct interviews as necessary and recommended to the Board of Education a bias review services or expert for the assignment. e. By December 1994, ADE will negotiate and contract with the bias review service or expert and oversee the contractor 1s activities for evaluating the Stanford 8, and/ or other monitoring instruments. - Rodger Cailahan I Jur,e 1, 1994 July 31, 1GS4 I Rodger Callahan Augus: 1, 1994 Sept mber 30, 1994 Rodger Callahan October 1, 1994 December 31, 1994 I' I, JI 58 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. INSERVICE TRAINING: Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. Assess whether existing ADE or Educational Services Cooperative in-service trainir,\nprograms address the n-service training needs of desegregating districts, idenLifyi g subjects for new, or enhanced in-service training prog\nrams. Rodger Callahan March 15, 1995 March 1995 and I ongoing I i I I Betty Gale April 1994 Oagoing Davis, Oliver Dillingham, Mike Crowley, Bob Kerr Betty Gale March 15, 1994 Ongoing Davis, Oliver Dillingham, Bob Kerr, Mike Crowley 59 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. Implement in-service training programs to add ess in-service training needs of desegregating districts. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregadng districts. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS: Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education prog:rams. Betty Gale March 15, 1.994 Ongoing Davis, Oliver Dillingham, Bob Kerr, Mike Crowley I Oliver May 1994 Ongoing Dillingham, Equity Olivc1 September 1994 Ongoing Dillingham, Equi'~y I Ken Vaughn April 1994 ( See dates on individual key activities) 60 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of each year, Districts will s pply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subiect area. b . Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request informaCon from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minority-eacher graduates. c. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. Ken Vaughn May 1994 O .. going, as stated I I Ken Vaughn May 1994 On::\noing, as stated ' I Ken Vaughn Within 30 days Ongoing of receiving data I i 61 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d. Eac:, November, ADE will reqHest information from the Districts on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance, including an assessment of the minority teacher candidate database. e. Meet with and encourage ADHE to recruit minority students into teacher education and to recruit minority teacher aides into teacher educatfon Assist Districts' efforts of minority-teacher recruitment at career days of each in-state college and university and at one out-of-state univE:rsitv Ken Vaughn November 1994 Ongoing, as I stated I I I I State Board of AprH 1994 Ongoing Education, Ecima Bass, Rodger Caliahan, Lead Planner I Ken Vaughn April, 1984 Ful1 Scale by September, 1994, und ongoi..1g I therec.fter 62 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Continue to maintain a database that includes data for all certified teachers in Arkansas, including their race and gender, and provide the data to districts on a regular basis FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES: Assist ADHE in identifying, analyzing, addressing and eliminatng racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. a. Representa-tives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together, review ADHE's available data to identify racial disparities in allocation of scholarships . Ken Vaughn Ongoing Ongoing Lead Planner April, 1994 Ongoing Lead Planner April , 1994 Ongoing I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b . U sirs its knowledge about public schools, teacher education and certifica ion, and through a collaborative effort with the Districts, ADE will analyze racial disparities in ADHE scholarship allocations. ADE will report its findings, conclusions, and recommend-tions about racial disparities in allocating scholarships to ADHE. c. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education ins ti tu tional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. Lead Planner April, 1994 On1\noing I Lead Planner April, 1994 Ongoing I I I I _Jj 64 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I With the ADHE, assist minority students by evaluating existing laws that are intended to provide scholarship incentives to minority students pursuing education degrees and proposing amendments to existing legislation, or new legislation, to address shortcomings of existing- laws. a. Representa-tives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together to identify and assess the impact of existing laws that were intended to increase the number of minority graduates with teaching certificates Lead Planner ! November, 1994 0. going Lead Planner Novembe, 1994 Ongoing 65 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b. Working Lead Planner within the Executive Branch's policy development and legislation development process, ADE and ADHE will propose legislative measures for reducing racial disparities in allocating scholarships. ------ Monitor the Lead Planner allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis November 1994 Ongoing --- ..,.,.,~ .... ...,.__ ____ ~-~---..c- April, 1994 Ongoing 66 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF: Administer the ADE Minor~ty Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (See Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and timelines . ) Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan Gene Wilhoit, March 15, 1994 Ongoing Clemetta Hood, State Board of Education I, Gene Wilhoit, Ongoing Ongoing Clemetta Hood, State Board of Education 67 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SCHOOL CONSTRUC-TION: Improve the effectiveness of the ADE's existing rules, regulations, and site evaluation form for assessing the desegregation impacts of school construction between school districts. a. Review existing rules, regulations and site evaluation forms and their application to school construction projects within districts and between districts Sheila Freeman, / pril, 1994 Ongoing Oliver Dillingham, Barry Kin cl, Danny Lovelady I Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 October, 1994 Oliver Dillingham, Barry Kincl, Danny Lovelady 68 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses impacts on racial balances of individual school sites within the three districts Address shortcomings in existing rules, regulations and school improvement forms by developing and proposing changes to the State Board of Education and promulgating new rules anu regulations through the State's Administrative Procedures process Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 October, 1994 Oliver Dillingham, Danny Lovelady Sheila Freeman, April, 1994 October, 1994 Oliver Dillingham, Bob Shaver I I 69 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ASSIST PCSSD: Determine if the PCSSD wants and needs assistance in lowering the costs of Black History course offerings to its certified staff If PCSSD wants assistance, communicate with local colieges and universities to facilitate the Black History course offerings to PCSSD teachers at the lowest cost possible SCATTERED SITE HOUSING: Through Executive Branch communication procedures, ADE will inquire about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about the availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered-site housing Lead Planner, April, 1994 Ap,.il, 1994 Ken Vaughn Lead Planner, April, 1994 September, Ken Vaughn 1994 Danny Lovelady April, 1994 May, 1994 70 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I If State-owned land within Pulaski County is available for scattered-site housing, the ADE will refer information about the sites to the Uppropriate tate and ederal housing gencies STANDARD-IZED TEST SELECTION TO DETERMINE LRSD LOAN FORGIVENESS: Meet with and propose to representa-tives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the District's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement Danny Lovelady April, 1994 June, 1994 - -- Rodger April, 1994 May, 1994 Callahan, Vicki Gray, Sheila Freeman, Gene Wilhoit I 71 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Fully implement the Extended COE Improvement Plan process in all schools in the three Pulaski County school districts Conduct the Extended COE School Improvement Plan peer review process in 20% of the schools each year (every school every 5 years) and provide peer review team recommend-ations to the schools reviewed Receive from all schools, annual reports on progress toward meeting recommend-ations of School Improvement Plans Follow-up and assist schools that have diificulty realizing their school improvement obiectives Bob Maddox, July 1994 Ongoing James Hester, Bob Kerr, Mike Crowley, Emma Bass Bob Maddox, Ongoing Ongoing James Hester, Bob Kerr, Mike Crowley Bob Maddox, Ongoing Ongoing James f-iester, Mike Crowley, Bob Kerr Expanded Team Ongoing ,:)ngoing Iv.embers (to be iden ti:ied) 72 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATA COLLECTION: Through the Lead Planner April, 1994 Ongoing School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan C. Controlling and Coordinating the Implementation Phase The Lead Planner and the Desegregation Oversight Group are directly responsible for controlling and coordinating the ADE Implementation Phase both within the ADE and between ADE and other parties. Project Management Strategy. The AD E's project management strategy for controlling and coordinating the Implementation Phase in'rnlves:     Communication. The ADE will establish a sm. .. nd basis of understanding, within ADE and between ADE and other parties of Implementation Phase, roles, responsibilities, and tasks at the inception of the Implementation Phase. Collaboration. The ADE will collaborate with other parties and stakeholders throughout the Implementation Phase process and time period. Organization. The ADE will organize itself and provide the resources to develop and install the monitoring instrument, to conduct monitoring operations to address the goals and otJectives of the Implementation Plan, and to respond to Districts 1 requests for assistance during the Implementation Phase. Oversight. The ADE will closely monitor its perfo~ 0 mance dur:i.ng the Implementation Phase, identifying problems and taking corrective action on '-'-timely basis. Evaluation. The ADE will evaluate its effectiveness during the Implementation Phase and take corrective action when and where needed. 73 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Management Tool. The project management tool provides the vehicle for timely and comprehensive monitoring of ADE's performance during the Implementatior. Phase. Project management software has been obtained and installed in ADE's Management Information Systems Section and members of the Implementation Phase Working Group will be trained on use of the software. In summer, 1994, AD E's computer network will be enhanced so that the Implementation ?hase Working Group members can individually update the project management tool from their office compu.  'S and the Lead Planner can compile project management reports off the system on a regular basis, or as needed. Project management reports will be compiled monthly, reviewed with the Implementation Phase Working Group, the Director, and the State Board of Education, and submitted to the Court. Project management reports will provide status information on ADE's progress toward achieving Implementation Plan goals and objectives, as measured by progress within timelines indicated in the Implementation Plan. Each monthly report will describe actual progress against planned activities for the reporting period and \"to date\" during the Implementation Phase. The first project management report will be prepared, reviewed and submitted to the Court at the end of April, 1994. Project management reports will be submitted on a monthly basis throughout the Implementation Period, or until ADE and the Court determine the reporting on another timeframe is more useful. 74 - - ----------------- $36,000.00 l)P..X bJS (estimated) at a 5. 8% ir,te:::-est. ra~:0 40 buses at $1,348,000 financed for 5 yrs. - $27~,413 20 ruses at $ 720,000 f iJ,.anced for 6 yrs. - $1~5, 502 10 ruses at $ 360,000 fjnanced for 6 }'TS. - $ 72\n751. Year I 94-95 95-96 96-97 I 97-93 I 98-99 I I I 99--200) !: 2C00-2()01 I ,'.)1-02 I 02-03 L 03-01 - i Funds spent 272,413 272,413 i ! i i I I 272,413 272,413 I 272,413 I 272,41] I I 145,502 145,502 I 145,502 I ' ! I 145,S02 1-~5, 502 I 1,15, 502 72,751 i 2x 72,751 I :3:x. 72,751 ,',x 72, 75J_ 5x 72,751 6x 72,751 I 6x 72f7:51 i 6:-: 72, 75.l i\ni I I ! Buses Per I I i i i I I I I Year 40 20 10 10 i 10 i I on I I .1...J I lO lO I 1J\n10 I ' I I I i I I Total Cost i I I I Per Year 272,413 417,915 490,666 563,417 ! 636,168 I 708,919 509,257 436,'506 i 4-~ c:::~,. ! 135,506 I .::,e,, ....,..,) ----'- Year 04-05 05-06 06-07 I I 01-oa I aa-09 I 09-10 i 10-:1 I 11-12 I 12-13 I lJ-14 i I Funds sper1t 6x 72,751 6x 72,751 5x 72,751 i I I t I I 6X 72, 751------------------------------------- / I ! ------\u0026gt; I I I --~----+-------+---~---------'------+'----'--'-----'-'----,'- -----+----,-------!------- ! ' i ! I I i I Buses Per Year 10 10 10 10 i I 10 I 10 I , r . \" -V j_\\_/ i :LO 10 j -------+-------+------+-------'-------:i_ ----'------~---- ! I ,, i, Ii ! I i I I I I Total Cost I Per Year 436,506 436,506 436,506 ! l ' lr..j \" -'6 ,:.-)o_b- - JI\" -'.=' .-_ . -., --:,\n:,-~J--o,- /t.\"Jr -\"'(\" 1- ----5  .,,. .-or.. 1\"'5 C::'\"\\6 l,\"'6 \"-'r' I 1 -.::.-o,~v...:,\n1 1_,(:-,::., '...1\\J 1 :..J o\n.) 1 :.Jv it\u0026lt;-' ,_...,_,10 I '-----~------'-----'------''------'------ L.R. N.L.fz. ----------------------- -------------- -------------- 1st year distriL~J~ion 2nd yecir di.stcib\n1tion 3n\nyear distrib.,ticn *Distrib.1tlc:-ns 2.ac': year after 20 12 r 0 l :i I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I. ARKANSASD EPARTMENTO F EDUCATION- GENERALE DUCATIOND IVISION MINORITY RECRUITMENTP LAN INTRODUCTION The following plan has been developed to ensure a work force for the General Education Division of the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE - GED) which represents the diversity of the population and students of Arkansas schools. It is offered to satisfy two mandates: 1. A directive from the State Board of Education made in July, 1993 for the ADE Personnel/Human Resources Office to develop a Minority Recruitment Plan which addresses the following: - increasing the hiring of minorities at all level positions across all sections\n- promoting upward mobility/promotion opportunities for minority employees\n- establishing and reinforcing the expectation that responsible duties are assigned to minority employees\n- increasing the participation of minorities in staff development and leadership roles\n- developing and maintaining a work environment which reflects the diversity of the work force and the students served. EXHIBIT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. The settlement agreement of September, 1989 for the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case in which the ADE agreed to the following: 1) Develop and implement a plan to identify jobs and consultant positions within the Department in which minorities are underrepresented and will recruit and employ minority applicants for those positions so as to create a balanced, desegregated staff at all levels. 2) Set recruitment and hiring practices so as to promote full utilization of minorities and to provide a highly qualified staff to all sections in the Department. The racial composition of each section shall be consistent with goals established by the State Board of Education for increasing minority employment within the agency. The goals identified by the committee are: 1. 2. Recruit and hire minorities to decrease the disparity of minority employees, across classifications and within sections, by 1/3 each fiscal year to reflect the population of students served. Collect and use needs assessment data regarding recruitment, hiring and retention. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. 4. Establish a process which ensures that a work force reflecting the population of students served exists within each section and level of the ADE - GED. Create and promote a positive public image of the ADE - GED as a desirable work place for minorities. II. THE PLANNING PROCESS/RATIONALE The corrnnittee which convened on January 26, 1994, made a conscious decision to direct their proposed plan to a picture of success rather than a problem - orientation approach. This is a result of their agreement that the achievement of an ADE - GED work force which represents the diversity of the students they serve and provides high quality services with corrnnitment and enthusiasm, will resolve the current problems of concern. The following elements were determined to be critical to this picture of successful recruitment and retention of a skilled diverse ADE - GED work force: do more than meet minimum requirements use and reflect/acknowledge skills and expertise of current staff in job descriptions provide oversight for fairness in all employment processes (job description, evaluations) encompass all staff_ (not just Grades 21+) balanced, qiverse workforce built-in accountability system to ensure goal achievement I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i. support system for minority staff quality and equity for all employees provide a multicultural and diverse work environment and climate to reflect diversity of employees provide diversity in visual appearances (media, conferences, speakers) provide active recruitment to reach out to diverse candidates ensure on-going awareness/need to include minorities in positive, valued role effective minority recruitment \"on-the-road\" recruitment identify and hire skilled people with diverse backgrounds provide on-going training/professional development opportunities accessible to all employees (not hand selected) The next steps in the planning of the committee were to identify what is currently in place to support this picture of success, and then to identify the gaps or needs to ensure achieving this picture of success. Also, data were provided to each committee member regarding the race, gender, job classification and salary of the current ADE - GED work force. All of the resulting information was then reviewed to identify problem or goal areas to structure the plan. The committee recognized early in the process that a diverse skilled enthusiastic work force is the best way to recruit new employees to ensure a diverse work force. Therefore, retention is given equal weight to recruitment through the development I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I of a positive work environment and public image for the ADE - GEO. Accountability, especially that of ADE - GED senior management and administrators was seen as essential to achieving and maintaining a diverse work force. Data collection was considered crucial to identifying needs, targeting recruitment pools and making hiring decisions. An ongoing and pervasive projection of a diverse positive image was considered to be critical to attracting a diverse pool of skilled candidates for short and long term purposes. Such a positive image depends on effective dissemination of positive information about the ADE - GED and dissemination of specific hiring needs. The ADE - GED Recruitment Committee must be supported, replenished and changed to include all related stakeholders across levels of job functions. Quality time of at least three days per year must be allocated to reviewing and updating the plan\nand building a collegial teani spirit. Participation on the committee must be considered a top priority, with regular attendance required and contribution expected. The following plan is proposed as a result of this planning process and the synergistic commitment of the current.participants. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I #1 GOAL:  RECRUIT AND HIRE MINORITIES TO DECREASE THE DISPARITY OF MINORITY EMPLOYEES, ACROSS CLASSIFICATIONS AND WITHIN SECTIONS, BY 1/3 EACH FISCAL YEAR, TO REFLECTT HE POPULATIONO F STUDENTSS ERVED. OBJECTIVES/STRATEGIES 1.1 Develop scales for salaries for all grades of employees which are competitive with the three largest school districts. 1.2 Research and plan the dissemination of available positions within the ADE and across school districts. 1.3 Develop recruitment materials which present a diverse work force in a wide variety of ADE - GED work settings and positions, and maximize the use of minority publications to showcase ADE activities and successes. 1.4 Develop a team interview model to be used within and across sections. - #1 GOAL: Recruit and hire minorities to decrease the disparity of minority employees, classifications and within sections, by 1/3 each fiscal year, to reflect the population of students served. Page __J_ of__5_ 1.1 OBJECTIVE/STRATEGY: Develop scales for salaries for all grades of employees which are competitive with the three (3) largest school districts. 1.1. l 1.1. 2 1.1. 3 - ACrIONS Review \u0026amp; analyze salary information from three largest school districts for comparison purposes Recommend a competitive salary plan to Governor's Office, Office of Personnel Management \u0026amp; Legislature. Review \u0026amp; analyze salaries of school districts and the ADE - GED RESOURCES REQUIRED I-local fiscal I services I- 3 school I districts I I III I meeting time clerical support 1- local fiscal I services on an annual basis in order to main- I tain competitive salaries. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - -1- - I I I I I PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE S'l'/\\RT D/\\TE Personnel Mg. 3/1/94 Director Selected Committees Personnel Mg. 5/1/94 Director Selected Committee Personnel Mg. 3/1/94 Director's staff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1- 1 /' --- ... STOP DATE 4/30/94 7/\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1437","title":"Report: \"Incentive School Recruitment Monitoring Report,\" Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1994-03-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: \"Incentive School Recruitment Monitoring Report,\" Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1437"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["74 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1581","title":"Court filings concerning Arkansas Department of Education integration to desegregation cases, school districts finances, Incentive school recruitment, District planning, and legal proceedings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1994-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School enrollment","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","Education and state","School districts"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning Arkansas Department of Education integration to desegregation cases, school districts finances, Incentive school recruitment, District planning, and legal proceedings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1581"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["51 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1537","title":"Court filings concerning Arkansas Department of Education's jurisdiction, Pulaski School Districts funding, and legal proceedings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1994-02-24/1994-02-28"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Education--Finance","School districts","School management and organization","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning Arkansas Department of Education's jurisdiction, Pulaski School Districts funding, and legal proceedings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1537"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["81 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_930","title":"North Little Rock Response to Monitoring Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1994-01-25"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","School integration","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["North Little Rock Response to Monitoring Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/930"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["49 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nJAN 2 1 1994 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS NORTH LITTLE ROCK RESPONSE TO MONITORING REPORT The North Little Rock School District wishes to comment on three aspects of the 1993-94 School Racial Balance Monitoring Report appeared by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and dated January 12, 1994: 1) the calculation of racial balance\n2) the Baring Cross Elementary School\nand 3) the Alternative School. CALCULATION OF RACIAL BALANCE The Monitoring Report indicates at page 5 that, while the NLRSD Plan makes no reference to organizational level, the District nonetheless calculates racial balance for elementary and secondary school separately each year based on the racial composition at each level. Furthermore, in determining the range of acceptable racial balances at NLRSD elementary schools, the Report uses the total elementary population including kindergarten students. The NLRSD believes that its plan does indicate that racial balances are to be calculated by organizational level and, further, that its plan provides for the exclusion of kindergarten students in determining the elementary school population for racial balance purposes. While we understand that kindergarten students may have been included to maintain consistency among the reports of the three districts and including kindergarten students did not change the compliance status of any NLRSD school, we wanted to clarify this matter for future reference. Turning first to the inclusion of kindergarten students, we would direct the Court's attention to pages 7 and 8 of the NLRSD's Desegregation Plan approved by the Court April 29, 1992 (4/29/92 Plan). In the discussion of elementary school racial balance, the Plan repeatedly refers to the elementary population as being approximately 42% black and 58% black. The Plan also indicates that the NLRSD has 4,620 elementary students of whom 2,467 are nonblack and 1,793 are black. In discussing the racial composition of elementary students, the reader is directed to Addendum lA as the source of these numbers. Addendum lA is a table showing the racial composition of the school districts entitled \"North Little Rock Elementary Schools Racial Count As Of October 1, 1985, Excluding Kindergarten Students.\" (Emphasis supplied). Likewise page 8 of the Plan reflects that kindergarten students are not transported for purposes of racial balance. We submit that, when the applicable provisions of the NLRSD Plan are read in their entirety, it is apparent that the Plan contemplates the exclusion of kindergarten students in determining the racial composition and racial balance of the NLRSD elementary schools. It is submitted the same conclusion must be reached with respect to the Plan's anticipation that racial balance would be determined by organizational level. A review of page 8 of the 4/29/92 Plan reflects an application of the 25% standard to the 2. elementary schools. This application is based on the data contained in Addendum lA which is limited to the elementary school population excluding kindergarten students. Thus, we submit it was clearly anticipated that the racial balance of the NLRSD's elementary schools was to be determined by comparison only to the elementary organizational level, excluding kindergarten students, and not to the total population of the school district as a whole. Further support for this conclusion is found in the original North Little Rock Plan which can be found at 2 Joint Designated Record at 81 et~- (2 JDR 81) The same kind of calculations were done for the junior high schools and senior high schools in the original plan, see 2 JDR 87-88, and these calculations were derived from Addendum 1D which reflects separate calculations for the racial composition of the junior and senior high schools. The application of the 25% standard to the junior and senior high schools in the NLRSD is found at 2 JDR 88 and that application is once again based on organizational level. Because the senior high schools had been reorganized into single grade schools and the junior high school assignment zones had been changed, Addendum 1D was deleted from the 4/29/92 Plan since it had been superseded by events. However, we would submit that it is appropriate to look at the original plan in determining whether it contemplated, and still contemplates, the application of racial balance standards based on student populations by organizational level. BARING CROSS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The Monitoring Report indicates at page 5 that the Baring 3 Cross school is out of compliance with the racial balance guidelines. We respectfully disagree. It should be noted that the Court (Judge Woods presiding) found in 1987 that all elementary schools in the NLRSD were in compliance with the 25% racial balance guideline. LRSD v. PCSSD, 659 F.Supp. 363, 367 (E.D. Ark. 1987). This specific finding incorporated into the 4/29/92 Plan. of the Court was likewise A review of Addenda lA and 1D reflects that the Baring Cross Elementary School was 70% black at the elementary level and 77% black at the secondary level when the Court made this finding in 1987. The Court's finding would be seemingly inconsistent with the 25% standard were it not for the footnote referring to Baring Cross contained in both Addenda. These footnotes state, \"Baring Cross was created as an alternative to placing severely handicapped children in state institutions. The only students assigned to this school were those who are profoundly and multiply handicapped.\" 4/29/92 Plan Addendum lA and 2 JDR 95, Addendum 1D. Thus, we submit it was never intended that the 25% racial balance guideline be applied to the Baring Cross Elementary School. There are good reasons for Baring Cross' exclusion. As the footnote indicates, Baring Cross serves only students with profound and multiple handicapping conditions. Parents of students at Baring Cross have the option of placing their children in a regular school if that is their preference. The NLRSD created the school, however, as institutions an alternative to for individuals placement with 4- in state residential severe developmental disabilities. The NLRSD cannot control the racial composition of this population and all students in this population are eligible to attend Baring Cross. It would be inappropriate for the District to assign students away from Baring Cross simply to maintain an artificial level of racial balance. In short, it was never contemplated in the Plan or by the Court that racial balance guidelines appropriate for the assignment of the general student population be applied to the Baring Cross Elementary School. As a result of the Court's earlier ruling and the recognition of the exceptional nature of Baring Cross, we submit that Baring Cross is not out of compliance with the racial balance guidelines, at least to the extent that such a lack of compliance would indicate a violation of the NLRSD's Desegregation Plan. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL The NLRSD's Alternative School was not contemplated by the Desegregation Plan. Section 5 of the Plan does direct the creation of an alternative school to be contained at the North Little Rock Boys Club. However, the Alternative School located at the former Argenta Elementary School is a separate and distinct program. While it can be argued that, since the Plan is silent with respect to the Alternative School the 25% racial balance guidelines would be applicable, it is respectfully submitted, that it would be inappropriate to apply that standard in these circumstances. One of the ten specific segregative acts which the Court found the NLRSD to have committed was that \"a disproportionate number of blacks drop out of school. \" NLRSD 5- Desegregation Plan, 4/29/92 at page 5\nLRSD v. PCSSD, 584 F.Supp. 328, 349, paragraph 102 (E.D. Ark. 1984), and Section 5 of the NLRSD Plan, \"Compensatory Programs Aimed at Dropout Prevention\", was directed at remediating this specific segregative act. While the Alternative School was not required by the NLRSD Plan, the creation of that school reflects an additional effort by the NLRSD beyond its plan requirements to address the problem of the disproportionate dropout rate among black students. Thus, the Alternative School is a solution to a problem, and one would expect the solution to a problem be as disproportionate in its application as the existence of the problem. In other words, to the extent that a disproportionate number of black students drop out of school, one would expect there to be a corresponding disproportionality in the assignment to the Alternative School since it is a program specifically directed at reducing school dropouts. Certainly, the NLRSD could artificially insure that the racial composition of the Alternative School mirrored the racial composition of the District by organizational level. To do so, however, would only result in depriving black students of an alternative educational dropping out of school. its own right. experience intended to keep them from This could be considered segregative in An immediate and compelling example of the harm inherent in such an approach can be found with respect to expelled students. As with dropouts, the Court found that the NLRSD had committed a 6 . segregative act in that blacks were disproportionately expelled from school. However, Section 7 of the Plan, \"Discipline, Expulsions and Suspensions\", which contains the programs required of the NLRSD to remediate this segregative act, does not include the Alternative School as one of those requirements. Nonetheless, the NLRSD in the 1993-94 school year has offered expelled students an alternative educational program as an option to out-of-school expulsion. This has included the Alternative School as well as the educational program administered by the Juvenile Courts. A disproportionate number of students expelled are black, but, instead of being expelled to the \"street,\" the District is presently giving them the option of attending either the Juvenile Court School or the Alternative School. If strict racial balance guidelines were to be applied to the Alternative School, however, the result would be to exclude these students from participation in the Alternative School. We hardly think this is a desirable outcome, and, we respectfully suggest that the 25% racial balance guidelines were not intended to apply to the Alternative School and that to apply them to the Alternative School would, in fact, result in harm and not benefit to black students. January d I, 1994 By: Respectfully Submitted, JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)375-1122 , ~ - CI \"-vt L'-t-.. \\/ S ephen W. Jones,# ATTORNEY FOR NORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT 7- 8083 LITTLE ROCK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE -\nj\n:_,1- I, Stephen W. Jones, hereby certify that I have this _6 ,_ day of January, 1994, sent one copy of the foregoing, via hand delivery, to the following: Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John W. Walker, Esq. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard w. Roachell, Esq. ROACHELL and STREET Attorneys at Law First Federal Plaza 410 w. Capitol Ave., Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 _,. (_) STEPBE~NW' . JONES 8\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1344","title":"Proceedings: ''Hearing on Racial Balance''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1994-01-25"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School board members","School integration","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Hearing on Racial Balance''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1344"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["214 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1431","title":"Report: ''1993-94 School Racial Balance, Monitoring Report,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1994-01-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''1993-94 School Racial Balance, Monitoring Report,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1431"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["174 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1389","title":"Proceedings: ''The Arkansas Department of Education's Development Plan''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1994-01-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School improvement programs","School integration","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''The Arkansas Department of Education's Development Plan''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1389"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["151 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_61","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's semi-annual report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1994/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's semi-annual report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/61"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["285 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nFile of Ann Brown, federal monitor\nCARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / / --------------------------------------------- 1------- ~ w 1 / / / I // ---------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 // / ---------------------------------------- 1- / LL 0.6 , 0 / --------------------------------------- / ffi 0.4 // m , --------------------------------------- ~ 0.2 /// z \u0026gt;--__.n ____ n.___ __ ____,_n 0 ~--- ---- --- -~~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp V) I.O ...... CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Cl) a: w 1.2 1 / / / Kindergarten Teachers _____________________________________________ j _______ _ I // --------------------------------------- -- D9 Years Exp ~ 0.8 // 1-- // LL 0.6 / 0 a: w m ~ ::::\u0026gt; z 0.4 / 0.2 / / / / / / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp \\0 \\-0 CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers ~ w I 1.2 1 / / / o 0.8 , ~ / ------------------------- 1-- ,' LL 0.6 , 0 / a: / w 0.4 , m , ------------------------- ~ ,' ::\u0026gt; 0.2 , z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF  15 Years Exp  14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp -- 10 Years Exp r-.\".... . CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY: ~ UJ I 1.2 1 / / / LRSD Kindergarten Teachers ____________________________________1__ ____________ __ ~ 0.8 ,,' --------------------------------------- 1-- // LL 0.6 / 0 a: UJ m ~ ::\u0026gt; z 0.4 / 0.2 / BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 00 \\,0 - CLOVERDALE ELEMENT ARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 3.5 _____________________________________________ 3- ______ _ ~ 3 ,,' LU --------------------------------------- I ,' o 2.5 , --  9 Years Exp ~ r- 2 / --------------------------------------- 1.L. ,' 0 1.5 , a: LU 1 ,' al .--------------------------------------- ~ / / :::\u0026gt; 0.5 , z ~----------------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp 0\\ \\-0 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers (J) a: 1.2 / _______________________________ j ____________________ _ LU 1 / / / I , ------------------------- ~ 0.8 // ------------------------- 1-- // LL 0 a: 0.6 , 0.4 , 0.2 , / / / () () --------------- () LU m ~ :::\u0026gt; z 0 ~--- -==~ ~-~ ---~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More D30 Years Exp 25 Years Exp 20 Years Exp a15 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ~---~ 0 .r.-.-.-.. GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY: LRSD ~ w I (.) ~ I-LL 0 1.2 1 / 0.8 , 0.6 , / / / / / / / / a: // w 0.4 , m ~ ::) z 0.2 , Kinder arten Teachers -------------------------------------------1------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp __ 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp ...... .r.:.-.-.. en a: LU I ~ I-LL 0 a: LU al ~ GEYERS PRINGS ELEMENTARYL:R SD Kindergarten Teachers /  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp ~ ~~()..,__ ___ ..,_() ___ .y()_ __ -----\u0026gt;,J-()----,1 o I~~==:? --- --- ---\n\u0026gt;/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience N t..... GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY: LRSD ~ w I 2.5 2 / / / ~ ,' uJ 1.5 , ~ LL 0 a: w 1 / / / m , ::E /~ :::::, 0. 5 , z Kindergarten Teachers -------------------------------2-------------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ~ r.-.-.... ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :::) z GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARYL:R SD BM Kindergarten Teachers WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers / Cl) a: I,\u0026lt;) w .r.-.-.-.. I ~  9 Years Exp I- a Years Exp u. 0 7 Years Exp a: 6 Years Exp w m ~ 5 Years Exp z= \u0026gt; (\\ (\\ (\\ (\\ o? - - - - ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience ~ w GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / / ______________________________ j ___________________ _ 1 / / / I // ------------------------ D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp ~ 0.8 ,, , ------------------------ 1-- / LL 0.6 , 0 a: w m 0.4 , 0.2 , / / / / ------------------------ / ------------------------ / t--------------- () () n ~ ::::\u0026gt; z 0 L,/4--- --- .____ ___,=. ==3/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 10 Years Exp \\0 .r.-.-.-.. HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD ~ UJ I ~ I-LL 0 cc UJ m ~ z= \u0026gt; / ('\\ 0 ~ - BM Kindergarten Teachers ('\\ ('\\ ('\\ WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp r. r.-.... HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / / -------------------------------------------- 1------- Cf) a: 1 / / / w // --------------------------------------- I /, ~ 0.8 , ,' ___ ------------ ------------ ______ t-- // IL 0.6 , 0 / -------------------------------------- a: /// ~ 0.4 , ~ / -------------------------------------- / ::J / / z 0.2 / \" \" ('\\ 01/. - - BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp ,__ 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp 00 t--- HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Cl) a: UJ I ~ r- LJ.. 0 a: UJ CD ~ ::::\u0026gt; z Kindergarten Teachers 0 ,._______ __________ ____./ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 35 Years Exp  30 Years Exp 25 Years Exp 20 Years Exp 15 Years Exp 10 Years Exp O'\\ r-- KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: 1.2 ~ LlJ 1 / / / LRSD Kindergarten Teachers / -------------------------------------------- 1 ------- I ---------------------------------------- // ~ 0.8 // ILL 0 a: LlJ m ~ :::\u0026gt; z 0.6 / 0.4 / 0.2 / / / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 0 0.0. ... KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 ~ / 1 / , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - - .1 - - - - - - - LU I / / -- D9 Years Exp ~ 0.8 , I-LL 0.6 , / / / -------------------------- 0 ,--------------------------- / a: / LU 0.4 , cc / -------------------------- ~ ., ::, 0.2 , z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp ..... 0.0. ... KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 2.5 Cl) a: w I / -------------------------------------------2------- 2 / / / () / ------------------------------------- ~ 1.5 / / I-LL / -------------------------------1------ Q a: w m ~ ::J z 1 / 0.5 / / / / ------------------------ / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 16 Years Exp D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp N .0.0. ... MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ ::J z BM LRSD Kindergarten Teachers WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp C\"'\u0026gt; 0-0 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: 1.2 Cl) a: / 1 / w I () / 0.8 / ~ I- / 0.6 -/ LL 0 a: / 0.4 / w ca ~ 0.2  :::\u0026gt; z 0 / / / / LRSD Kindergarten Teachers ---------------------------------------------1------- _  9 Years Exp BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp s:t\" .0.0. ... MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: 0.2 / / / BM LRSD Kindergarten Teachers WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF D15 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp V\") .0.0. ... ~ LU I ~ I-LL 0 a: LU al ~ ::::, z MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARYL:R SD Kinder arten Teachers BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / / - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -1 - - - - - - - 1 / 0.4 / 0.2 / / / / / / / ---------------------------------------- / --------------------------------------- / n n n o I~=== --- --- --- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience - -  9 Years Exp a Years Exp - - 7 Years Exp - - 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp - - t'-- 00 ~~ (J) a: UJ I (.) ~ I-LL 0 a: UJ al ~ :::\u0026gt; z MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY: LRSD 1.2 / / 1 / / / 0.8 / / / 0.6 / / / 0.4 / / / 0.2 / 0 / / Kindergarten Teachers --------------------------------------------1------- ----- 16 Years Exp BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 15 Years Exp  14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 00 0-0 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers / Cl) a: w 0\\ :c 0-0 () 4 Years Exp Lli ~ 3 Years Exp LL 0 2 Years Exp a: 1 Year Exp w m ~ ::\u0026gt; z \" \" \" \" 0~ - - - - ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience ~ LU I ~ t-u.. 0 a: LU m ~ :::\u0026gt; z PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers /  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp () () () () 0~ 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience 0- ' PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / -------------------------------------------1------- / / / ~ w 1 / I / / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - ~ 0.8 // / ---------------------------------------- 1-- / I LL 0.6 1 0 -------------- ------------------------ / iJ: // w 0.4 / m ~ ::J z 0.2 / n n n 0 l~c::.- =====::, .i::::i.~~:i::::t'?' _.. __ _,. .._ __ __, BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Y ec\n\\rs Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ~ w I ~ tu_ 0 a: w m ~ :J z AMBOY ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Kinder arten Teachers BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp AMBOY ELEMENTARY: ~ w 1.2 1 / / / I , o 0.8 ,' tS I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :::\u0026gt; z 0.6 ' 0.4 , 0.2 , NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers / _____________________________________________ j _______ _ --------------------------------------- / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF --  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp (\"') .0.\\ .... 0 AMBOY ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - (/) / / / a: 1 / w 15 Years Exp I / ---------------------------------------- - - / (.) / D14 Years Exp -.::I\" 0.8 / 0\\ ~ - / --------------------------------------- - - 13 Years Exp ~ / / 0.6 / LL 12 Years Exp 0 / ---------------------------------------- - - a: / / 11 Years Exp 0.4 / w al / ---------------------------------------- - - 10 Years Exp ~ / / ::J 0.2 / z () () () - I? - 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More Cl) a: w I 0 ~ t- LL 0 a: w m ~ :::) z CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: 1.2 / / 1 / / / 0.8 / / / 0.6 / 0.4 / 0.2  / 0 NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers ---------------------------------------------1------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp \u0026lt;r) .0.\\ .... U) a: w I () ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :::::\u0026gt; z CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: / o I~ NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers n () () n BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience D9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp \\0 .0.\\ .... CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: 0.6 , 0.4 .  0.2 , NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp t--' CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / -------------------------------------------1------- ~ / / w I 1 ~ 0.8 // I- / LL 0.6 / 0 a: w m ~ ::::\u0026gt; z / 0.4 / 0.2 / / / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 00 0-\\ CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: w m . ~ ::::, z BM NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp 0\\ .0.\\ ... CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 / ---------------------------------------------1-------- / ~ 1 // Iw ,, ---------------------------------------- - D14 Years Exp ~ 0.8 , ~ 0.6 , 0 cc / / w 0.4 , m ----------------------------------------- ~ // :z:: :\u0026gt; 0.2 , BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp - 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 0 0 N LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers / 4 Years Exp ...... 0 N 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp . 1 Year Exp BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ 1- u.. 0 a: w m ~ ::) z NLRSD Kindergarten Teachers / \" \" \" \" 0 ,~----... .e::/1.~!:l:IIC!!!:l:::n::c::i., ____ ..., c=.===-===:71/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience D9 Years Exp E8 Years Exp  7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD .. Kindergarten Teachers ~ 1 : / --------- ----------- - ------------------L----- 16 Years Exp ~ , - ------- --- -------- -- ---- --- ------ -- -- -- 15 Years Exp ~ 0.8 // ~ LL 0.6 , 0 0.4 , ------------------------------------- / / a: w m . / ------------------------------------- ~ ::::, z 0.2 / / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp M 0 N MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD ~ w 1.2 1 / / / I , Kindergarten Teachers ,----------------------------------------------1------- ---~------------------------------------ ~ 0.8 // ------------------------------------------ 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp - 2 Years Exp __ 1 Year Exp r- // LL 0.6 , 0 a: UJ al ~ :::, z 0.4 / 0.2 / 0 / / / / BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience ~ w I 0 ~ I-LL 0 a: w co ~ ::\u0026gt; z MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD 1.2 / / 1 / / / 0.8 -/ / / 0.6 / / / . 0.4 / / / 0.2 / 0 / Kindergarten Teachers ---------------------------------------------1------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF -- D9 Years Exp a Years Exp 7 Years Exp -- 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp Cl) a: LU I 0 LiS I-LL 0 a: LU al ~ :::\u0026gt; z MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD / () o? BM Kindergarten Teachers () () WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More () - WF ~ 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp B11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp \\0 0 N SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD ~ w I 1.2 / 1 / Kindergarten Teachers / -----------------------------------------------1-------- --------------------------------------- / / ~ 0.8 ,', --------------------------------------- ~ ,' LL 0.6 , 0 a: w co ~ :::\u0026gt; z 0.'4. // / 0.2 , / / --------------------------------------- / --------------------------------------- / o~-----------------' BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp r-- 0 N SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD ~ w I 1.2 1 / ~ 0.8 // I- / LL 0.6 , Kindergarten Teachers / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1. - - - - - - - 0 / -------------------------------------- - D9 Years Exp a Years Exp 7 Years Exp -- 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp aw: 0.4 , / m ~ ::) z 0.2 , BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience 00 0 N Cf) a: w I (.) ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :) z SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD / . n 0~ BM Kindergarten Teachers n (1 WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More n WF D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 0 ' 01 ~ UJ I ~ ..... LL 0 a: UJ m ~ :::J z BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kinder arten Teachers 0------------ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp .0. ... N ~ UJ I ~ I-LL 0 cc UJ [Q ~ ::) z BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers ~~------ --- ~--. 0 ------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience- D9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp --N BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers 2.5 ~ /// ---------------------------------------------2------- ~---~ LU 2 , 15 Years Exp I 0 --------------------------------------- ~ 1 .5 //// I-LL 0 a: 1 / / / / --------------------------------------- aLUl ,, --------------------------------------- ~ 0.5 // z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF __ D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp -- 10 Years Exp .N. .. N CJ) a: w I (.) ~ ~ LL 0 a: w m ~ ::J z CATO ELEMENTARY: 1.2 / / 1 / / / 0.8 / / / 0.6 / / / 0.4 / / /. 0.2 / 0 PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers _____________________________________________ 1 ______ _ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp CATO ELEMENT ARY: 1.2 ~ / / PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers _____________________________________________ j ______ _ Iw / --------------------------------------- 1 / _  9 Years Exp ~ 0.8 / tu. 0.6 / 0 --------------------------------------- / a: / w 0.4 / m --------------------------------------- ~ // :::\u0026gt; 0.2 / z -~----------,J----------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp Cl) a: LU I ~ I-LL 0 a: LU m ~ ::::, z DUPREE ELEMENT ARY: 2.5 / / 2 / / / 1.5 / / / 1 / / / 0.5 / 0 / / / PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers ---------------------------------------------2------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp DUPREE ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 ~ / -------------------------------------------1------- UJ I ~ 1 / 0.8 / / / / / 1-- // LL 0.6 / 0 a: UJ 0.4 / / / ------------------------------------- / ------------------------------------- / m / ------------------------------------- ~ // - ::\u0026gt; 0.2 / z \u0026gt;---------~--------- ..:. BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF -- 11124 Years Exp 20 Years Exp 18 Years Exp -- D14 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ...... ~ aen: w I () ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ ::\u0026gt; z FULLER ELEMENT ARY: 1.2 / 1 / / 0.8 / / 0.6 / / 0.4 / / 0.2 / 0 / / / / / PCSSD KindergartenT eachers ____________________________________________ j _______ _ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp FULLER ELEMENTARY: 1.2 ~ w 1 / I ~ 0.8 / I-LL 0.6 , / / / / PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers / --------------------------------------------- 1------- -- D9 Years Exp --------------------------------------- / 0 / --------------------------------------- 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp -- ii6 Years Exp a: / w 0.4 / m ~ ::J z 0.2 , / / BM 5 Years Exp WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience FULLER ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 ~ / ____________________________________________ j _______ _ w 1 / I -------------------------------------- // ~ 0.8 // 1-- // LL 0 a: w co ~ ::::\u0026gt; z 0.6 , 0.4 , 0.2 , / / / / -------------------------------------- / -------------------------------------- / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF . 22 Years Exp 18 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ~ LANDMARK ELEMENT ARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 ~ / --------------------------------------------- 1------- w 1 / / / I / --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 //, --------------------------------------- ~ // LL 0 a: w ca 0.6 , 0.4 , / / ~ / :z:J 0.2 , ______________ ________. 0 ,,_______ __________ __, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp ii2 Years Exp 111 Year Exp tr) N N LANDMARK ELEMENT ARY: ~ LU I ~ t- LL 0 a: LU al ~ ::) z BM PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience D9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp \\0 N N LANDMARK ELEMENTARY: ~ Ll.l I ~ I-LL 0 a: Ll.l m ~ ::, z PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers / () n n () 0 -~--_-___ p_-_-_-_-_ -_ --~~~~~~--- --- -- ----~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 24 Years Exp D22 Years Exp 18 Years Exp ,\n,.1 6 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 10 Years Exp TAYLOR ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers 1.2 ------- -----------------------1--------------------- / / ~ 1 // IU J ,, ------------------------- / ~ 0.8 , r- LL 0.6 / 0 a: / w 0.4 , m ------------------------- ~ // / ~ 0.2 , 0 ,._____ ___________ ____, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 00 ~ ~ w I (_) ~ 1- u. 0 a: w m ~ :::::, z TAYLOR ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Kindergarten Teachers o~-------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp ~' ~ LU I ~ ~ LL 0 a: LU m :E :::\u0026gt; z TAYLOR ELEMENTARY / Kindergarten Teachers n n WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More n \" ~ WF 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11111 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 0 \u0026lt;'\"\u0026gt; N KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS By Race, Gender, and Years of Experience School BM WM BF WF # of Years Experience Carver 3 5 13 13 Cloverdale 2 7 8 30 Geyer Springs 4 11 14 Gibbs 14 Hall 9 King 8 5 16 10 11 Mabelvale 8 17 Meadowcliff 9 16 Pulaski Heights 14 School BM WM BF WF # of Years Experience Amboy 6 14 Central Elem 4 12 16 Crestwood 4 13 Lakewood 16 Meadow Park 4 7 Seventh Street 3 1 5 Baker 11 14 Cato 5 16 10 Crystal Hill 2 6 8 9 Dupree 5 8 24 Fuller Elem 4 6 22 Landmark 3 Taylor 4 The fifth subsection reports the number of F.T.E. librarians by race, gender, school and years of experience for the Cycle V schools for the 1994-95 school year. 231 CJ) a: UJ I 0 u5 ~ LL 0 a: UJ co ~ :J z CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp . 1 Year Exp n n n n 0~ '1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience r.1. nf N (\") N Cl) a: LU I ~ I-LL 0 a: LU m ~ :::) z CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / D9 Years Exp B Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp n n n n 0~ ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience M M N CARVER MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians 1.2 ~ / --------------------------------------------- 1------- w 1 / I I I // --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 // I --------------------------------------- 1-- / LL 0.6 / 0 a: w a:, ~ :::) z 0.4 / 0.2 / I / I / I BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF D35 Years Exp D30 Years Exp -- 25 Years Exp 20 Years Exp 15 Years Exp -- 10 Years Exp CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians 1.2 ~ ---------------------------------------------1------- LU 1 / / / I --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 ,,' --------------------------------------- 1-- // LL 0.6 , 0 ffi 0.4 // al / --------------------------------------- z~ 0.2 ,  _ ________._.__.___ ____ _ BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF - 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / Cl) a: w I D9 Years Exp \\0 ~ a Years Exp C'1 N t- 7 Years Exp LL 0 6 Years Exp a: w 5 Years Exp m ~ z::: :\u0026gt; n n n n 0 ,~ '1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: UJ al ~ LRSD Librarians / , . ~ n n n n z ~~~~=::::-:-:-:--\n--\n-----_-\n:\n:\n-:.---:.---:.---:.\"':.---:.-:.-/- 0 I\u0026lt;.-/_- _____________ ___, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More  30 Years Exp 25 Years Exp 20 Years Exp 15 Years Exp 10 Years Exp t-- M N GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY: LRSD 1.2 ~ UJ 1 / / / / I ,, ~ 0.8 ,' 1-- // LL 0.6 , 0 ffi 0.4 /// Librarians -------------------------------------------1------- ------------------------------------- 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp __ 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp m ------------------------------------- ~ /// :::, 0.2 , z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF 00 M N ~ w I () ~ I-LL 0 a: w ca ~ ::, z GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / D9 Years Exp a Years Exp ? Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp ('\\ ('\\ ('\\ ('\\ 0~ - - - - -\n/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience 0\\ M N GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / Cl) a: UJ I D14 Years Exp 0 'SI\" ~ 13 Years Exp N ~ 12 Years Exp LL 0 11 Years Exp a: UJ 10 Years Exp m ~ :::) z () () () () o I/- / BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More aen: UJ I () ~ ~ LL 0 a: UJ m ~ ::J z GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp () () () () 0~ ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience -\"\u0026lt;t\" N . GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / Cf) a: w I N (.) \"St\" ~  9 Years Exp N I- B Years Exp LL 0 a: 7 Years Exp w ca 6 Years Exp ~ :z:\u0026gt; s Years Exp n n n n 0 V. - - - - o/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience GIBBS MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians 1.2 ~ w I ,,\"' ------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 /, ------------------------------------- ~ , LL 0 a: w 0.6 , 0.4 , / / ------------------------------------- / m , ------------------------------------- ~ , ::, 0.2 , z --------------------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF - D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Librarians / Cl) a: w I () 4 Years Exp ~ \"\u0026lt;t\" 3 Years Exp \"\u0026lt;t\" I- N LL 0 2 Years Exp a: w 1 Year Exp al ~ :::, z n n n n o I/. \"' \"' - - ? BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Librarians / ~ w I D9 Years Exp () B Years Exp ~ V) ? Years Exp '\u0026lt;:t\" ~ N LL 0 6 Years Exp a: w 5 Years Exp al ~ :::\u0026gt; z ('\\ ('\\ n ('\\ al~ - - - - ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Librarians 1.2 / / ------------------------------~--------------------- ~ 1 / LU // ------------------------ I ,  ~ 0.8 , ,' ------------------------ ~ // LL 0.6 / 0 / ------------------------- a: // / ~ 0.4 / ~ / ------------------------ / :::\u0026gt; / / z 0.2 / 0/.A --\"-----\"-- - ~-~~-----:~ n BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 19 Years Exp  18 Years Exp 17 Years Exp 16 Years Exp 15 Years Exp 10 Years Exp KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: / Cl) a: w I 0 ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ::E :::J z 0 l,,/4 LRSD Librarians n n n BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience r-- -.::t- N 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp n '1/ WF KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / (J) a: w I D9 Years Exp 00 s:t\" (.) N ~ B Years Exp I- 7 Years Exp LL 0 6 Years Exp a: w 5 Years Exp ca ~ ::::) z n n n n 0 I,? ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience KING MAGNET ELEMENTARY: / / / 0.4 , LRSD Librarians ------------------------------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More  14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 10 Years Exp MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: .LRSD ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: w al ~ Librarians / z~ n n n n \u0026gt;--- ______________ _,___ _______ ----\no I~--- --- --- ---~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / CJ) t: w I D9 Years Exp ...... () V) Li'j a Years Exp N I- 1117 Years Exp LL 0 6 Years Exp t: w 5 Years Exp m ~ :z:: \u0026gt; () () () n 0 ,~ -\n/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience MABELVALE ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians 1.2 / . / -------------------------------------------1------- ~ UJ 1 / / / I ,' ------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 ,', ----------- ____________________ _____ J- // LL 0.6 , 0 / a: / w 0.4 , m ~ ::::, 0.2 , / / z n n n 0 ~-===== --- --- ,.__ _ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More -- D19 Years Exp 18 Years Exp 17 Years Exp -- 16 Years Exp 15 Years Exp - - '----------' N V) N ~ LU I ~ 1-- u.. 0 a: LU m ~ ::J z MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / () () () () BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians 1.2 ~ / -------------------------------------------- 1------- w 1 / / / I // --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 /, --------------------------------------- 1-- / LL 0.6 , 0 / --------------------------------------- aw: 0.4 , / m ~ ::::\u0026gt; z 0.2 , / / / --------------------------------------- / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF --  9 Years Exp B Years Exp 7 Years Exp -- 6 Years Exp s Years Exp MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / aCl): 16 Years Exp w 15 Years Exp I () V) D14 Years Exp V) ~ N I- 13 Years Exp u. 0 12 Years Exp a: w 11 Years Exp m ~ 10 Years Exp :z:\u0026gt; () () () () I~ 11.in a1 1 11,,111111111 .C:i a: 1 : 1 1 n, 1/ 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More ~ UJ I ~ I-LL 0 a: UJ al ~ ::::\u0026gt; PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp Z n n n n 0 /.----------------~- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience Cl) a: w I () ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ ::::, z PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Librarians / D9 Years Exp a Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp n n n n 0 L,,/4 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience ~ lf) C'l PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD ~ w 1.2 1 / / / I / ~ 0.8 // I- // LL 0.6 / 0 fl: / / w 0.4 / / Librarians --------------------------- ---------------1------- D15 Years Exp  14 Years Exp -- 13 Years Exp m ------------------------------------- 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp -- 10 Years Exp ~ /// :::, 0.2 / z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 00 V) 01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / Cl) a: LJ.J I 0-.. ~ on 4 Years Exp N r- 3 Years Exp LL 0 2 Years Exp a: LJ.J 1 Year Exp m ~ :z:: J n n n n 0~ '1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience AMBOY ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / (f) a: UJ I D9 Years Exp ~ 0 B Years Exp \\0 N t- 7 Years Exp LL 0 6 Years Exp a: UJ 5 Years Exp al ~ ::::\u0026gt; z () () () () 1~1 i !  I ! I I , ~ 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience AMBOY ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians 1.2 --------------------------------------------- 1------- / ~ w 1 / / / ::r: / ~ 0.8 //, --------------------------------------- 1-- // u.. 0.6 , 0 / --------------------------------------- a: // w 0.4 , m ~ // ::::\u0026gt; 0.2 , z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF 15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp -- 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp -- 10 Years Exp CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / CJ) a: LU I 4 Years Exp N (.) \\0 N ~ 3 Years Exp I-LL 2 Years Exp 0 a: 1 Year Exp LU m ~ :) n n n n z 0~ 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / ~ w I D9 Years Exp ~ (\") a Years Exp \\0 N r- 7 Years Exp LL 0 6 Years Exp a: w 5 Years Exp al ~ :::) () () () () z ~1111111111111111!11 mz, ~ 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience CENTRAL ELEMENTARY: ~ w 1.2 1 / / / I , ~ 0.8 ,' J-- ,' LL 0.6 , 0 / ffi 0.4 ,' m , ~ / ::, 0.2 , NLRSD Librarians ---------------------------------- ________1_ ___ _____1 7 Years Exp 16 Years Exp D15 Years Exp -- 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp z ------------------- 12 Years Exp -- 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ NLRSD Librarians / z~ n n n n 0 ~--- --- --- ---~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: Cl) a: LU I ~ I-LL 0 a: LU co ~ NLRSD Librarians / ~ ____n_ __ _ n._____ _ n_ ___ n_ _ 0 ~----- ----- .c::::::zi:::::..::c::::::::c:v .----~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience D9 Years Exp B Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp \\0 \\0 N CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians 1.2 / ---------------------------------------------1------- / ~ 1 // IU J /// --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 / / --------------------------------------- 1- / u.. 0.6 / 0 --------------------------------------- / a: / ~ 0.4 / --------------------------------------- ~ /// 2 0.2 / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF -  19 Years Exp 17 Years Exp 15 Years Exp - 13 Years Exp 11 Years Exp LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / Cl) a: LU I 4 Years Exp 00 ~ '-0 N 3 Years Exp I-LL 2 Years Exp 0 a: 1 Year Exp LU m ~ :z:J n n n n o I~ 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / Cl) a: w I () 0\\ D9 Years Exp \\0 ~ N I- a Years Exp LL 0 7 Years Exp a: mw 6 Years Exp ~ 5 Years Exp :::\u0026gt; z ('\\ ('\\ ('\\ ('\\ al~ - - - ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY: 1.2 / / / 0.4 / NLRSD Librarians ------------------------------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 15 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp - 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp en a: w I () t5 I-LL 0 a: w al ~ ::::, z MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp () () () () 0~ 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience ..... r-- N MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / Cl) a: w I 9 Years Exp N ~ a Years Exp t--- N J- 7 Years Exp u.. 0 ' 6 Years Exp a: w 5 Years Exp al ~ ::::, () () () () z ~!\"Ill! ml I'! ! !!  !I:! !I , ~ 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians 1.2 / -------------------------------1--------------------- / Cl) / / a: 1 / w D15 Years Exp I / ------------------------- --------------- / (_) / 14 Years Exp ~ 0.8 / t-- ~ N / ------------------------- --------------- 13 Years Exp J- / / 0.6 / LL 12 Years Exp 0 / ------------------------- --------------- a: / / 11 Years Exp 0.4 / w m / ------------------------- --------------- 10 Years Exp ~ / / 0.2 / :z:J n () () 0 ,~ -/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More Cf) cc w I ()  ~ r-u.. 0 cc w m ~ :::\u0026gt; z SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp () () () () 0~ '1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience \"\u0026lt;t\" t'-- ('I (J) a: w I () ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :) z SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians /  9 Years Exp B Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp n n n n 0~ 1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience l() t-- N SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Librarians 1.2 ~ / ___________________________________________ j ______ _ ,' 17YearsExp 18 Years Exp UJ 1 / I , ~ 0.8 ,', ------------------------------------- 1-- / / LL 0.6 , 0 a: / w 0.4 , m ~ ,' ::J 0.2 , z --------------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF -- 16 Years Exp D15 Years Exp D14 Years Exp -- 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 10 Years Exp I.O tN ~ UJ I ~ I-LL 0 a: UJ ca ~ BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians / 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp z~ ------n- ------------n- ---- n n 0 ~--- ---- --- ----'1/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience rtN Cl) a: w I 0 ~ I-LL 0 a: w m ~ :J z BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians /  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp n n n n 0~ - - - ~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience 00 r-- N BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians 1.2 ~ / _____________________________________________ j _______ _ w 1 , / / I // --------------------------------------- ~ 0.8 ,/ / --------------------------------------- ~ / LL 0.6 , 0 / --------------------------------------- ffi 0.4 // / m / --------------------------------------- 3 0.2 /// z BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF -- D24 Years Exp 22 Years Exp 18 Years Exp -- 14 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 0\\ r--N CJ) cc: LU JC (.) ~s t-,- LL C) cc: LIU 00 1111:- 1111:::: :) -~'? - CATO ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience WF , 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 0 00 N ::::::\u0026gt; CATO ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience WF D9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp ..... 00 N CATO ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians 1.2 / (I') . - - - -.... - - - - - . --- - - .. .. . - . - - .. .. . .. - . - .. . - . - - - .. - - - . - .. 1 - . - - .... - c,r::~ / 1 D20 Years Exp .-' LL.I -[\" . - - - - .. - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - --.. - - - .. - .. - - .. - . -- - - - - - - - .. .. - 18 Years Exp N ( ''1 / 00 ... 0.8 N c:r LL.I . -- - - --- - - - - -- - - - - - ... --- - -- - - .. - - .... ... - .. - - - - -- - - .. .. - 16 Years Exp ~\" , LL.. 0.6 14 Years Exp ( .,. 111f~ .. -  -- - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - .. .. . ... .. . - .. - - .. - - . - .. c11::: 0.4 12 Years Exp LL.I c..i.:..:.:.i .... - - .. - - - - - - -- -- - -- .. - .. .. - - - - - --.. - - - . .. .. -- - - - - .... - - .. 10 Years Exp / -:::~: 0.2 ::::1 n n n -::,1 ,t., ... ~ '7 0 BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More 0) 11::j:: L.l.J ..L... (M) 111:~t u.J I,,,._ L..l. I ,. .,. ltufil 11::i: L.LJ 11::1:t ::::~~ :::::::\u0026gt; :\n!:: CRYSTAL HILL INTERDISTRICT: PCSSD / n 0 ~ BM Librarians n n () WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience . 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp ~ 00 N CRYSTAL HILL INTERDISTRICT: PCSSD ~ lJ_J I ~ I-LL 0 a: lJ_J al ~ :::, z BM Librarians WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp s::t\" 00 N CRYSTAL HILL INTERDISTRICT: PCSSD Librarians 1.2 / _______________________________ j ____________________ _ ~ 1 / / / IL U //, ------------------------- ~ 0.8 , , ------------------------- 1-- ,' LL 0.6 , 0 a: / / LU 0.4 , m ------------------------- ~ // / ~ 0.2 , BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF D19 Years Exp 17 Years Exp 15 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 11 Years Exp tr) 00 N (() 11:1: l..lJ :::i: ,, ) 1~.~  ,11:5 1..1 i'\"- 1..1_ () 11:1: I. .U ,1:0 11:=\n1H::- ,,,J \"\n:\n,i 11 ... - DUPREE ELEMENTARY: / n () ? BM PCSSD Librarians n n n WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience 4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp \\0 00 N DUPREE ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians / (/) ,c: UJ I (.) t'-- 00 ~ D9 Years Exp N I- 8 Years Exp LL. 0 7 Years Exp a: LU al 6 Years Exp ~ 5 Years Exp :::) z n () n () oV- - - - - o/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience Cf) CC LU I () L5 I-LL 0 ex: LU [0 111- .::: :::) z DUPREE ELEMENTARY: 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 PCSSD Librarians - - - .. - - .. - - - - - - - - - - -- - .. - - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - .. 1-- .. - - - .. - BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF  15 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 12 Years Exp  11 Years Exp - - 10 Years Exp 00 00 N Cl) er: IJ.J J: (.) ~s J-- Lt- C) cc: U.J 00 -=:- ..::~ ::\u0026gt; --, ,e._ FULLER ELEMENTARY: / 0~ PCSSD Librarians () () () n --- ---- ---- ----~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience  4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp 0\\ 00 N co cc:: LL.I -r (.) c3\" Lt.:I ~ .... LL.. () FULLER ELEMENT ARY: PCSSD Librarians 0\"------------------ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience  9 Years Exp 8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp 0 0\\ N FULLER ELEMENTARY: 1.2 1 0.6 ,' U\" LJJ 0.4 n:I1 5\n:..:.:.,., 0.2 .' PCSSD Librarians / - - .. - .. - .......... - - .. -- - - - -- .. - .,_ - .... - - - - .... -- .. .. ... .. .. - - - - - - ...... j ........ -- - - -- - BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF -- D25 Years Exp 19 Years Exp 16 Years Exp -- 13 Years Exp 10 Years Exp LANDMARK ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians 0\"--------------------' BM .WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience  4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp N 0\\ N LANDMARK ELEMENTARY: ~ w I ~ ..... LL 0 a: w al ~ ::) z PCSSD Librarians .-..-- ...- Alll'lll!l!l!E'Bl!l!ll!ll!!3llll!IZEIIV' ..----- .------ 0 ,.___-------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience  9 Years Exp  8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp s Years Exp LANDMARK ELEMENTARY: PCSSD Librarians 1.2 Cl) / -- - -- - - - -- - ,. -- - ,, - -- - -- - - - -- ,, ,. .,. - ,, ,, -- - -- - - -- -- ,. ., - - ,. - -- - -- -1- -- - ., - - ,. ffi 1 _  I ~ 0.8 / I- / u. 0.6 ,/ 0 ffi 0.4 ./ m -------------------------------------------------------- ~ 0.2 - , z --------------- BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More WF --- 18 Years Exp 16 Years Exp 14 Years Exp - 12 Years Exp 10 Years Exp 0) cc LIJ :c () t5 I-- Lt_ C:) Cl~ LU Cll .11:1.:- : :J -\n,, tll.- TAYLOR ELEMENTARY: / n o l,,/4 - BM PCSSD Librarians n- n- n- WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER One to Four Years Experience ~ B4 Years Exp 3 Years Exp 2 Years Exp 1 Year Exp .,... 0\\ N (/) 1:r:: I.LI :I:: Cl ,ud_Jt' .. l.L.. C .. ,, 1:r:: 1.U 1...x..:.1. .\n:!: :::1 :2~: TAYLOR ELEMENTARY: / n 0 V. BM PCSSD Librarians n n n WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Five to Nine Years Experience  9 Years Exp :-..8 Years Exp 7 Years Exp 6 Years Exp 5 Years Exp TAYLOR ELEMENTARY Librarians 1.2 ' . - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- .. -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - - -- - - - - - -1 - -- - - - - - 1 / :cot : U.J 11118Y ears Exp J\"- ~) 0.8 -16 Years Exp :I) r--- u. 0\\ 14 Years Exp C'l f- 0.6 / u._ () 12 Years Exp -- - - -- - -- -- - -. ct: 10 Years Exp U.J 0.4 / .C,.,! .l :,. ee.:. . ::, -=.. -'- 0.2 0------------------ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER Ten Years Experience or More LIBRARIANS By Race, Gender, and Years of Experience School BM WM BF WF # of Years Experience Little Rock School District Carver 1 20 Cloverdale 1 4 Geyer Springs 1 2 Gibbs 1 16 Hall 1 18 King 1 10 Mabelvale 1 19 Meadowcliff 1 7 Pulaski Heights 1 12 North Little Rock School District Amboy 1 11 Central Elem 1 17 Crestwood 1 17 Lakewood 1 17 Meadow Park 1 15 Seventh Street 1 12? Pulaski County Special School District Baker 1 22 Cato 1 18 Crystal Hill 1 11 Dupree 1 10 Fuller Elem 1 19 Landmark 1 18 Taylor 1 18 The sixth subsection provides the number of F.T.E. department heads by race, gender, school and years of experience for the Cycle V schools for the 1994-95 school year. The only Cycle V school with a Department Head is Hall High School. 298 HALL HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Cl) 7 / -------------------------------------------6-------- .-----------, ~ 6 / I rzw :?! \u0026amp;: ~ w C LL 0 a: w al :?! ::, 5 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1 / / / / / / / ---------------------------------- / / / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - / / / z 0\"--------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER 40 Yrs Experience -- 30 Yrs Experience 24 Yrs Experience D23 Yrs Experience D21 Yrs Experience  17 Yrs Experience 14 Yrs Experience  13 Yrs Experience The seventh subsection provides the number of F.T.E. secretaries by race, gender, school and years of experience for Cycle V schools for the 1994-95 school year. 300 Secretaries at Cycle 5 schools by race, gender and years of experience LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 Cycle 5 School Number of Secretaries Race Gender Years of Experience B F 6 Carver Magnet Elementary 2 w F 25 Cloverdale Elementary I w F 10 Geyer Springs Elementary I B F 6 Gibbs Magnet Elementary I w F 6 B F 13 Hall High 3 w F 20 B F 14 B F 20 King Magnet Elementary 2 w F 7 B F 5 Mabelvale Elementary 2 w F 18 MeadowcliffElementary I w F 21 Pulaski Heights Elementary I w F 24 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 Cycle 5 School Number of Secretaries Race Gender Years of Experience w F 17 Amboy Elementary 2 w F 3 w F 19 Central Elementary 2 w F 15 Crestwood Elementary I w F 5 Lakewood Elementary I w F 14 Meadow Park Elementary I w F 5 1.5 w F 21 Seventh Street Elementary (I full-time, I part-time) w F 8 301 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 Cycle 5 School Number of Secretaries Race Gender Yean of Experience w F 20 Baker Interdistrict Elementary 2 w F 23 w F 18 Cato Elementary 2 w F 17 Crystal Hills Interdistrict Magnet w F 19 Elementary 2 w F 2 Dupree Elementary 2 B F 23 w F 2 Fuller Elementary 2 w F 21 w F 19 Landmark Elementary 2 w F 6 w F 23 Taylor Elementary 2 B F 22 w F 7 302 The eighth subsection provides the number of F.T.E. central office positions by job category, race, gender, school and years of experience for the districts for the 1994-95 school year. 303 ....J w zz 2.5 2 / / / / 0 // ~ 1.5 // w Q. LL 0 a: w m ~ 1 / ~ 0.5 , / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Central Office Personnel ------------------2-------------- .. ---- --- -- -- 27 YE~arsI: :r i ! I'~ GD1 8 YE~arsI: :\u0026gt; 1i ,., -------1------------ --1 -----.-.. 12 YE~ar:Is: ~~ ...~. . ...- - ... -' o..___-------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Director of Federal Programs Central Office Personnel 1.2 / / ----~------------------------------------------------------ / / / 1 / .....J w z ----------------------------------------------- z / / 0 0.8 / Cl) Vl 0 a: ----------------------------------------------- 1  33 Years Expj ~ w / 0. / 0.6 / LL 0 ----------------------------------------------- a: / / w 0.4 / m ~ ----------------------------------------------- :::) / / z 0.2 / \"... , \"..., ('\\ \" ~ 0 V BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER 3.5 / 3 / _J UJ z / 2.5 / z 0 Cl) a: / 2 / UJ a. LL / 0 1.5 / a: UJ al / 1 / ~ ::, z / 0.5 / 0 / / / / / / / / / / / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Administration/Other Central Office Personnel // ------------------3 ------------3----------------------- / / / / / / / / / / BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER ~39 Years Exp D32 Years Exp 23 Years Exp 20 Years Exp 18 Years Exp 13 Years Exp 10 Years Exp I.O 0 M 5 / / 1 / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Psychological Examiner Central Office Personnel ---------------------------------------------------4--------- D16 Years Ex1: -- 12 Years ExI. :. r---  11 Years Exp ~ 9 Years Exp 6 Years Exp ----1 ------- O Years Exp 0--------------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER _.J w z z 0 ~ w a.. LL 0 a: w m ~ ::) z 8 7 / 6 / 5 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1 / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Department Chair/Athletic Director Central Office Personnel ,,,, ------------ ---- ------- -- -- -- -- ---7------- -- ---- ---------- -- ---- 22 Years Exp / // -----------------------6----- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ------------------ / ------------------ / ------------------ / D18 Years Exp 17 Years Exp 16 Years Exp 15 Years Exp D12 Years Exp 9 Years Exp 6 Years Exp ---------------4------- 4 Years Exp mo Years Exp 0\"------------------~ BM WM BF WF OM OF RACE AND GENDER ...J LU z 2.5 2 / / / / / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor Special Education Central Office Personnel / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z / --------------------------- / 0 ,' ~ 1.5 // LU D. LL 0 a: LU t0 ~ :::) 1 / z 0.5 / / / / / / / / -------------------1------- / / / - - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - -- OIL----------------__/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER --------- 0 ' a11 Yearr\nl: 1 ! ~  a Years E:.\u0026lt;: .___ ______~. 12 / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor(Other) Central Office Personnel ,,' --------------------------------------------- 10-------  31 Years Exp i:d 10 , 27 Years Exp z z 0 ~ w a. LL 0 a: w m ~ ::, z 8 / 6 / 4 / 2 / / / / / / / / / / / / 3 o~--------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER  23 Years Exp 22 Years Exp D21 Years Exp 19 Years Exp 16 Years Exp 15 Years Exp 6 Years Exp _J w z z 0 ~ w Q. 3.5 3 / 2.5 / 2 / / / / / / / / / / LL ,' 0 / a: w m ~ z= \u0026gt; 1.5 , 1 0.5 , NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Central Office Personnel / / / / / -------------------3-------------------------------------- ------------ 28 Years ExI~ 18 Years \u0026gt;l ~ 17 Years E..r, 15YearsE r. 0\"---------------------' BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER _J w z z 0 Cl) a: w a. LL 0 a: w m ~ :::\u0026gt; z NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Business/Finance Manager Central Office Personnel 1.2 / / ------------------ 1------------------------------------- / / / 1 / ------------ / / / / .. 0.8 / N ------------ / / / / 0.6 / ------------------------------- ~--- - 1 14 Years E~~ M ------------ / / / / 0.4 / ------------ / / / / 0.2 / f'\\ f'\\ f'\\ ~ ~ 0 ._____ __ .--v-lllP' ..--v-lllP'~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER ., 7 / / 6 / / LL // / 0 3 / a: UJ m ~ ::::\u0026gt; z 2 / 1 / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Administration/Other Central Office Personnel -------------------6---------------------------------------  36 Years Exp ElEJ2Y6e ars Exp M- 25 Years Exp M 19 Years Exp -------2------------------------ 16 Years Exp 13 Years Exp -------~--------- a.,_____ ____________ ___, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER _J w z z 0 Cl) a: w 0. LL 0 a: w m :E ::::, z 2.5 / / 2 / / / 1.5 / / / 1 / / / 0.5 / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Psychological Examiner Central Office Personnel / -------------------- 2------------------------------2---------- ------------- I fi!il0 Years Exp ------------- / ------------- 0\"-------------------' BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER ]-~ ~ 1.2 / / / / / 1 / ....J w z / / z / / 0 0.8 / ~ / w / / a.. / 0.6 / LL 0 / a: / / / w 0.4 / m ~ / ::) / / z / 0.2 / 0 1/. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Department Chair/Athletic Director Central Office Personnel ------------------ 1 -------------------------------------- 1 ------------- ,. ------------- I D27 Years Exp] ------------- ------------- n \" \" V BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER V) ...... M --' UJ z z 0 Cl) a: UJ Q. LL 0 a: UJ m ~ :::, z 1.2 / 1 / / 0.8 / / 0.6 / / 0.4 / / 0.2 / / / / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Curr. Supervisor K - 12 Central Office Personnel / ------------------~------------------------------------- / lrn21 Years Exp / / O..___------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER j ~ 3.5 3 / _J LU z z 2.5 / 0 Cl) a: 2 / LU Q. LL 0 1.5 / a: LU m 1 / ::E ::J z 0.5 / 0 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Subject Area Supervisor Central Office Personnel / ------------------------------------------------ 3--------- / / / BM WM BF RACE AND GENDER WF rn19 Years Exp ~ 12 Years Exp 9 Years Exp/ _J w z z 0 (j) a: w 0.. LL 0 a: w al ~ :::\u0026gt; z 1.2 / / 1 / / / 0.8 / / / 0.6 / / / 0.4 / / / 0.2 / / / / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor Special Education Central Office Personnel ---------------------------------- t------------ i -------- rnE11Y8 ears Exp 14 Years Exp o~----------------' BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER 0.0. ... M 3.5 ...J 3 / / / / / zw /// z 2.5 / 0 ~ w 0. 2 / 1 / 0.5 / / / / / / / / / / NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor(Other) Central Office Personnel -------------------------------------------------3--------- m15 Years Exp~ 12 Years Exp 11 Years Exp 0\"--------------------/ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent/Assistant Superintendent Central Office Personnel 6 / ------------------ 5--------------------------------------- _J 5 / LU / / / z // ------------ z // 0 4 , ~ / ------------ LU /, a. 3 // LL 0 a: ~ 2 ~ =\u0026gt; z 1 0 \"-------------------' BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER 27 Years Exp 24 Years Exp ~ 23 Years Exp 21 Years Exp 18 Years Exp _J UJ z z 0 Cl) a: UJ 0.. LL 0 a: UJ m ~ ::, z 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Director of Federal Programs Central Office Personnel / / -------------------1-------------------------------------- / / / / ------------ / / / / / - ------------ / / / / / I lml39 Years Ei~ ~~ ------------ / / / / / / ------------ / / / 0 ,.___ ___________ __, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER _J LU z z 0 en a: LU a. u. 0 a: LU m ~ :::, z 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Administration/Other Central Office Personnel / ----2 ----------------------------------------------------- / ~------. 21 Years Exp / N N 20 Years Exp C'1 / / -------1------------- ~-------------- 1--------  16 Years Exp 15 Years Exp o~----------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER ....J w z z 0 CJ) a: w Q. LL 0 a: w m ~ ::\u0026gt; z 1.2 1 / 0.8 / 0.6 / 0.4 / 0.2 / PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Vocational Administrator Central Office Personnel / / ------------------1------------------------------------- / / / ----------- / / / / / jm20 Years Exp ----------- / / / / ----------- / / / / / / / / / 0---------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER _J w z z 0 Cl) a: w Q. LL 0 a: w m ~ :::\u0026gt; z 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Curr. Supervisor Elementary Central Office Personnel / ------------------------------------------------ 1-------- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 0 --------------~ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER ....I w z z 0 Cl) ~ w Q., LL 01 ~ w m ~ :::\u0026gt; z 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Curr. Supervisor Sec. Central Office Personnel / ----~----------------------------------------------------- / / / ---------------------------------------------~- ----~ I f\nlll]26 Years Exp\\ / / 0\"----------------- BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Curr. Supervisor K - 12 3.5 .....J 3 / / / Central Office Personnel / ----------------------------------------------3-------- / UJ --------------------------------------- z // Z 2.5 , 0 Cl) / / __ ~23 Years Exp a: UJ D... 2 / / / / \\0 22 Years Exp ~ 1 / 0.5 , / / / / / / ------------------1-------------1-----0 \"---------------------J BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER 18 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 10 Years Exp ...Ji w z z 0 Cl) a: w a.. LL 0 a: w m :E :::::\u0026gt; z 10 8 6 4 2 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Subject Area Supervisor Central Office Personnel 9 30 Years Exp / / / / / 29 Years Exp 26 Years Exp / / / rn21 Years Exp / /  20 Years Exp - - 19 Years Exp / / / / /  18 Years Exp 14 Years Exp / / / 11 Years Exp / / 1 10 Years Exp o.._____ ____________ _ BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER r- C\"l ~ _J w z z 0 Cl) a: w a. LL 0 a: w ca ::E :::\u0026gt; z 6 5 4 3 2 1 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor Special Education / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Central Office Personnel --------------------------------------------------5--------- / / / / 25 Years Exp 20 Years Exp ~ 19 Years Exp 13 Years Exp  10 Years Exp ~ 0 ,._____ ____________ ___,, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Supervisor(Other) 6 5 / 1 / / / / / / / Central Office Personnel // ---------------------------------------- -----------5-- -------- ------------------------------------------- / ------------------------------------------- / / / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1-- - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - -- D25 Years Exp - - DJ 17 Yea rs Exp 15 Years Exp 14 Years Exp 12 Years Exp B Years Exp a.._____ _____________ ____, BM WM BF WF RACE AND GENDER School Supt/Asst Supt Dir Fed Progs Adm in/Other Psychological Examiner Dept Chair/ Athletic Dir Supv/Spec Ed Supervisor (Other) Supt/Asst Supt Bus/Fin Mgr Adm in/Other Psy Examiner Dept Chair/ Athletic Dir CENTRAL OFFICE PERSONNEL By Race, Gender, and Years of Experience BM # of Years WM Experience 18 1 1 11 1 21 27 1 15 2 3 2 # of Years Experience 12 18 10 18 39 0 12 15 15 16 23 17 18 28 14 16 19 25 0 27 BF # of Years WF # of Years Experience Experience 9 1 27 33 20 1 13 23 32 0 0 6 1 6 1 9 1 16 1 0 1 4 1 6 1 6 1 9 8 1 12 12 1 15 16 1 17 17 22 11 8 15 1 6 6 15 2 17 19 21 22 2 23 27 31 13 26 36 0 2 0 OF 1 # of Years Experience 18 School Curr Supv Sup Area Supv Supv Spec Ed Supv (Other) SupVAsst Supt Dir Fed Progs Adm in/Other Voe Admin Curr Supv Elem Curr Supv Sec Curr Supv K-12 Subject Area Supv Supv Spec Ed Supv (Other) BM # of Years WM # of Years BF # of Years WF # of Years OF # of Years Experience Experience Experience Experience Experience 1 21 1 9 -------------------------- 1 12 1 19 1 14 1 18 1 11 1 12 1 15 2 23 2 18 21 24 27 39 1 15 16 21 20 1 16 1 20 24 1 26 18 1 10 14 22 23 19 11 1 10 14 18 20 2 21 26 29 1 30 1 10 1 13 1 19 20 25 1 17 1 8 1 12 1 14 1 15 1 25 D. POLICY AND PROGRAM INFORMATION This section of the report indicates the Office of Lead Planning's assessment of policy and program information from the three school districts as stated on page 6 of the Allen letter, Section D. 330 w w.. ... Policy and Program Information Policy LRSD NLRSD PCSSD District has Administrative Chart indicating titles, names, responsibilities and reporting YES YES YES responsibilities. The District has Policies and Regulations for YES NO NO Magnet Schools The District has Policies and Regulations for YES YES YES Compensatory Education Programs. The District has Policies and Regulations for YES YES YES Majority to Minority Transfers. The District has Policies and Regulations for YES YES YES Transportation. The District has student Assignment Policies YES YES YES or Rules and Regulations. CONTINUED ON NEXT CHART w w N Policy and Program Information (Continued) Policy LRSD NLRSD PCSSD The District has Policies, Rules, Regulations and written Administrative Directive Governing: A. Class Assignment YES YES YES B. Testing YES YES YES C. Guidance and Counseling YES YES YES D. Extracurricular Activities YES YES YES E. Student Rights and YES YES YES Responsibilities F. Library Usage YES YES YES G. Student Records YES YES YES The District has made available copies of current negotiated YES YES YES agreements with all employee groups. CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS CHART E. STUDENT DISCIPLINE This section of the report provides student expulsion data for the Cycle V schools for the 1994-95 school year. Since no expulsions greater than 10 days occurred in the Cycle V schools, race, gender, school and teacher information is not relevant. 333 LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 SCHOOL NUMBER OF EXPULSIONS\u0026gt; IO DAYS Carver Magnet Elementary School None Cloverdale Elementary School None Geyer Springs Elementary School None Gibbs Magnet Elementary School None Hall High School None King Magnet Elementary School None Mabelvale Elementary School None Meadowcliff Elementary School None Pulaski Heights Elementary School None NORTH LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 SCHOOL NUMBER OF EXPULSIONS\u0026gt; IO DAYS Amboy Elementary School None Central Elementary School None Crestwood Elementary School None Lakewood Elementary School None Meadow Park Elementary School None Seventh Street Elementary School None PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT - FY 94/95 SCHOOL NUMBER OF EXPULSIONS\u0026gt; l ODA YS Baker lnterdistrict Elementary School None Cato Elementary School None Crystal Hill lnterdistrict Magnet Elementary School None Dupree Elementary School None Fuller Elementary School None Landmark Elementary School None Taylor Elementary School None 334 F. PERCEPTUAL DATA This section of the report indicates the Office of Lead Planning's assessment that all Cycle V schools utilized the results of perceptual surveys in Extended Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation Plans. 335 UITLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Utilized Perceptual Data of ECOE Plan SCHOOL YES NO Carver Magnet Elementary School X Cloverdale Elementary School X Geyer Springs Elementary School X Gibbs Magnet Elementary School X Hall High School X King Magnet Elementary School X Mabelvale Elementary School X Meadowcliff Elementary School X Pulaski Hei2hts Elementary School X NORTII LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Utilized Perceptual Data of ECOE Plan SCHOOL YES NO Amboy Elementary School X Central Elementary School X Crestwood Elementary School X Lakewood Elementary School X Meadow Park Elementary School X Seventh Street Elementary School X PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Utilized Perceptual Data of ECOE Plan SCHOOL YES NO Baker Interdistrict Elementary School X Cato Elementary School X Crystal Hill Interdistrict Magnet Elementary School X Dupree Elementary School X Fuller Elementary School X Landmark Elementary School X Taylor Elementary School X 336\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_834","title":"Budget: ''North Little Rock School District Budget''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1994/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School buildings","School employees","School facilities","Education--Evaluation"],"dcterms_title":["Budget: ''North Little Rock School District Budget''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/834"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["310 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nNORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET 1994-95 N (Q)I ffi/IrIBIJ LI TTTJL~ Iffi(.Q )C CI[ JPTIJJifLfi CC CCIE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET Steve Jones Jack, Lyon, \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. Attorneys At Law June 20, 1994 3400 TCBY Tower, 425 W Capitol Little Rock AR 72201-3472 Dear Steve: JUN 2 0 1994 Officeo f Desegregationlo rntor\n:ig As directed by the June 10, 1994 court order, this document represents the 1994-95 tentative budget for North Little Rock School District. The document contains six sections--Revenue and Expenditures\nExpenditures by Function, Object, and Function/Object for Salary, Operating, and Debt Service Funds\nFive Year Revenue and Expenditure Projection\nBudget Notes\nSalary Schedules\nand Program Analysis. The Revenue and Expenditure section provides graphs for 1994-95 projected revenue and expenditures. The revenue graph shows the amount of local, state, and federal revenue projected for the operating, debt service, capital outlay, and federal funds. The expenditure graph shows the combined expenditures projected for the funds included on the revenue graph and the salary fund. This section also provides detailed revenue for the operating budget and the federal programs. The beginning balance, ending balance, and a summary of expenditures for the operating, capital outlay, building/bond, and federal budgets are also included in this section. The second section provides expenditures by function, object, and function/object for the salary, operating, and debt service funds. The third section of this document provides a five year projection of revenues and expenditures for operating, capitol outlay, buildings, and federal programs. The Budget Notes section provides information regarding local tax revenue reduction, state funding, workers compensation, the need for millage increases, and the loss of desegregation settlement funds. The fifth section of the document contains the end-of-the-year (FY94) salary schedules for administrators, teachers, and classified employees. The program analysis for one new program and one expanded program is included in the final section of the document. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 A final 1994-95 budget document will be produced for board approval and submission to the Arkansas Department of Education and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring once the District's books have been closed for the 1993-94 fiscal year and additional revenue information has been received from the state. Sincerely, Donald Watkins Assistant Superintendent Business Services vs NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET .. 1994-95 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1994-95 ANNUAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Board of Directors, Superintendent and Assistant Superintendents ..................................... l REVENUEA ND EXPENDITURES Revenue Graph ........................................................ 2 Expenditure Graph .................................................... 3 Revenue and Expenditures -- Operating, Capital Outlay, Building/Bond, and Federal Programs ................................ 4 Revenue -- Operating Budget .......................................... 5 Expenditures -- Operating Budget ..................................... 6 Revenue and Expenditures -- Federal Programs ......................... 7 EXPENDITUREFSO R SALARY,O PERATIONASN D DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Expenditures by Function ............................................ .8 Expenditures by Object .............................................. 15 Expenditures by Function/Object ..................................... 21 FIVE-YEARR EVENUEA ND EXPENDITURPER OJECTIONS Revenue Projections -- 1994-1999 .................................... 77 Expenditure Projections -- 1994-1999 ................................ 78 BUDGETN OTES Budget Notes ........................................................ 79 SALARYS CHEDULES Administrators ...................................................... 80 Teachers ............................................................ 81 Classified Employees ................................................ 83 PROGRAAMN ALYSIS Army JROTC Program ...........................\n...................... 86 Reading RecoveryProgram Addition ................................... 91 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION Pat Blackstone, President Prentice Dupins, Vice President Marty Moore, Secretary Lynn Hamilton J. W. Johnson Mable Mitchell Larry Shadid James R Smith, Superintendent Assistant Superintendents Bobby Acklin - Student Affairs Mable Bynum - Desegregation Bobby New - Instruction Donald Watkins - Business Services 1 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE STATE REVENUE $20,567,680 53% 1994-95 LOCAL REVENUE $15,505,500 40% FEDERAL REVENUE $3,025,000 8% TOTAL REVENUE = $39,098,175.00 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES Satar tea 1994-95 Debt Service $1,200,000.00 t nsurance/ Other $221,000.00 Equipment $855,000.00 Supplies $1,565,000.00 Services $2,440,000.00 Tu it ion $1,120,000.00 Benefits $3,465,000.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES = $39,310,000.00 3 OPERA TING BUDGET FUNDS 01, 02, a 04 TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCE EXPENDITURES Salaries Benefits Tuition Services Suoolies Equioment Insurance/Other Debt Service TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE FEDERAL PROGRAMS (06) TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCE EXPENDITURES Salaries Benefits Services Supolies Equipment Other TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY (05) BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE BUILDING (03)/BOND (10) FUNDS BEGINNING BALANCES REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 1990-1995 - 1990-91 - 1991 -92 1992-93 1993-94 ACTUAL - ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED $32,294,537.77 $34,645,116.10 $34,680,190.72 $35,888,462.00 $22 189,901.75 $24 704 357.88 $24 654 619.76 $26 527 859.00 $2,539,762.48 $2,687,251.00 $2,624,924.22 $2,774,990.00 $1,115,205.60 $1,089,105.75 $1,067,374.16 $1,100,000.00 $2,102,210.72 $2,240,998.57 $2,159,022.38 $2,463,635.00 $1,246,073.84 $1,449,719.28 $1,244,849.46 $1,283,387.00 $770,454.71 $486,095.52 $218,292.93 $219,119.00 $393 822.41 $258 826.67 $256 304.01 $277 493.00 $1,169,554.97 $1,194,864.61 $789,841.15 $1 166,700.00 $31,526,986.48 $34,111,219.28 $33,015,228.07 $35 813,183.00 $767,551.29 $533,896.82 $1,664 962.65 $75,279.00 $2,038,196.59 $2,794,034.45 $3,560,377.92 $3,663,986.00 $778,814.49 $1,181,949.19 $1,644,091.99 $2,020,744.00 $245,764.17 $334,085.01 $441,367.07 $575,744.00 $138,083.28 $332,748.29 $472,493.90 $509,001.00 $295 901.95 $282 309.99 $371 965.64 $323 069.00 $243,540.22 $233,377.76 $206,103.77 $121,116.00 $27,448.05 $37,279.48 $42,809.42 $64,278.00 $1,729,552.16 $2,401,747.72 $3,178,831.79 $3,613,952.00 $308,644.43 $392,286.73 $381 ,546. 13 $50,034.00 $161,618.30 $2,014.05 $185,463.82 $34,828.00 $385,514.64 $494,814.65 $391,650.75 $400,000.00 $545 118.89 $311,365.08 $542,286.34 $420,000.00 $2,014.05 $185,463.62 $34,828.03 $14,828.00 $4,174,273.93 $1 396 597.95 $1,027,013.50 $3,277,801.00 $38,792.52 $414,325.83 $4,012 465.94 $235,000.00 $2,816,468.50 $783,910.28 $1,761,678.00 $2,231,025.00 $1 396 597.95 $1 027 013.50 $3 277 801.44 $1 281 776.00 4 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 PROJECTED BUDGETED CHANGE $36,900,753.87 $35,663,828.00 ($1,236,925.87 $26 905 600.00 $26 650 000.00 ($255 600.00 $3,010,900.00 $2,950,000.00 ($60,900.00 $1 116,220.00 $1 120 000.00 $3,780.00 $2,437,250.00 $2,110,000.00 ($327 250.00 $1,574,250.00 $1,275,000.00 ($299,250.00 $244,260.00 $135,000.00 ($109,260.00 $187 850.00 $190 000.00 $2 150.00 $1,188,770.00 $1,200,000.00 $11,230.00 $36 665 100.00 $35 830,000.00 ($1 035 100.00 $235,653.67 $33 828.00 ($201 825.87 $3,663,986.23 $3,251,525.00 ($412,461.23 $2,019,900.00 $1,794,000.00 ($225,900.00 $583,650.00 $515,000.00 ($68,650.00 $463,650.00 $330,000.00 ($133,650.00 $208 250.00 $270 000.00 $61 750.00 $106,100.00 $60,000.00 ($46,100.00 $30,900.00 $31,000.00 $100.00 $3,412,450.00 $3,000,000.00 ($412,450.00 $251 536.23 $251,525.00 ($11.23 $34 828.23 $1,028.00 ($33,800.23 $392 000.00 $670,000.00 $278 000.00 $425 800.00 $660,000.00 $234,200.00 $1,028.23 $11 028.00 $9,999.77 $3,277 801.44 $1,016 776.00 ($2 261,025.44 $170,000.00 $50,000.00 ($120,000.00 $2,431,025.44 $200,000.00 ($2,231,025.44 $1 016 776.00 $866 776.00 l$15o 000.00 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE 1990-1995 OPERA TING BUDGET 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 SAi.AR Y (01 ), OP'l!RA11NG (02), \u0026amp; omrr SHRYICI! (04) ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED BEGINNING BALANCE $576,482.48 $767,551.29 $533,896.92 $1,664,962.00 REVENUE, LOCAL Prooerty Taxes $8 318,915.54 $8 254 539.36 $8 463 731.24 $8 465,000.00 40% Pullback $3,273,349.66 $3,151,431.23 $2,659,432.57 $2,660,000.00 40% Pullback {Accrued) $928,368.16 $1,039,428.11 $1,584,228.23 $1,585,000.00 Delinquent Taxes $693,558.60 $1,236,053.69 $960,646.26 $1,000,000.00 Excess Commissions $30,328.77 $30,189.65 $31,612.84 $30,000.00 land Redemption $117,506.10 $84,695.83 $92,073.43 $75,000.00 Tuition - Summer School $79 943.42 $59 645.00 $66 435.00 $76 500.00 Interest $224,913.67 $58,425.29 $144,538.58 $110,000.00 Pupil Activitv Sales $58,356.00 $53,040.00 $56,816.18 $50,000.00 Rent and Miscellaneous $120 970.79 $130 096.65 $131,122.06 $95,500.00 Deseareaation - Sec. VIII.C - LR $250,425.00 Deseareaation - Sec. VIII.C - PCSSD $83,475.00 Tuition - PCSSD $71 675.46 $120 489.78 $96 047.54 $100 000.00 Cournv General and Severance Tax $35,236.96 $34,981.02 $35,830.83 $32 700.00 TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE $13 953 123.13 $14,253,015.61 $14,322,314.76 $14,613,600.00 REVENUE STATE MFPA $13 847 114.00 $16 296 020.00 $16 096 402.01 $16 361 513.00 State Aooortionment/Workers' Comoensation $28 896.00 $28 934.54 $28 479.49 Transoortation Aid $368,946.00 $588,197.00 $513,002.00 $494,317.00 M-to-M Incentive $532,463.00 $816,988.00 $1,131,696.00 $1 070 000.00 Compensatorv Education $337,951.47 $219,725.48 $251,557.04 $234,439.00 Special Education Suoervisor $65,734.00 $67,150.00 $67,150.00 $67,150.00 Act 591 Residential $11 480.20 $28 867.80 $26 957.82 $25 000.00 Special Education Preschool $93 695.00 $156 202.00 $314 325.00 Vocational Education $54,959.00 $48,934.00 $80,435.96 $24,602.00 ABC Preschool $161,500.00 $274,585.00 $234,116.00 Desearegation - Sec. VIII.B $778 050.00 $389,025.00 $389,025.00 $389,025.00 Deseareaation - Sec. VIII.C $293,239.74 $471 134.13 $455,368.81 $57,075.00 Maanet/M-to-M Transoortation $285 798.36 $327 148.98 $260 337.00 $300 000.00 Other State $46,450.56 $61,616.22 $36,039.95 $28,338.00 Public Law 874 and Other $55,128.00 $33,240.00 $22,762.00 $22,500.00 TOTAL STATE AND UNRESTRICTED FEDERAL REVENUE $16,706,208.33 $19,632,176.15 $19 790,000.06 $19 622,400.00 IU IAL LUl,.\nAL, 1,.\nC)Ofil IT,\n::, 11\\1 C I\\NU UNRESTRICTED FEDERAL REVENUE t.30 659 331.46 t.33 885 191.76 t,34 112 314.84 134.236 000.00 NON-REVENITE RECEIPTS /Sales Insurance Relund Misc.I $100,134.01 $55,135.56 155,264.44 $7,500.00 TRANSFERS TO/FROM OTHER FUNDS $958,589.82 {$62,762.51 1$21,285.48 1$20,000.00 GRAND TOTAL REVENUE.NON-REVENUE, 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 PROJECTED BUDGETED CHANGE $1,664,962.55 $235,653.00 1$1 429,309.55 $8 514 794.30 $8 320 000.00 1$194 794.30 $3,295,781.35 $3,250,000.00 1$45,781 .35 $863,568.65 $1,000,000.00 $136,431.35 $1,203,713.06 $1,150,000.00 {$53,713.06 $30,561.43 $30,000.00 1$561.43 $102,961.29 $100,000.00 ($2,961.29 $76 500.00 $76 500.00 $0.00 $119,291.03 $110,000.00 ($9,291.03 $55,000.00 $50,000.00 ($5,000.00 $129,565.00 $100,000.00 ($29,565.00 $263,862.40 $345,000.00 $61,137.60 $94,620.79 $115,000.00 $20,379.21 $117,254.41 $115 000.00 {$2 254.41 $35,369.94 $34 000.00 {$1,369.94 $14 922,843.85 $14,795,500.00 {$127,343.85 $16 733 932.00 $17 050 000.00 $316 068.00 $141 500.00 $141 500.00 $541,600.00 $500,000.00 ($41,600.00 $1,034,620.00 $1,000,000.00 {$34,620.00 $382,057.00 $480,000.00 $97,943.00 $67,150.00 $67,150.00 $0.00 $41,250.00 $40 000.00 {$1 250.00 $321 255.00 $325 000.00 $3 745.00 $24,602.34 $20,000.00 {$4,602.34 $234,439.01 $240,000.00 $5,560.99 $389,025.00 $389,025.00 $0.00 $57,082.32 $0.00 {$57,082.32 $271 430.00 $275 000.00 $3 570.00 $140,000.00 $40,000.00 {$100,000.00 $25 665.00 $25,000.00 1$665.00 $20,284,107.67 $20,592,675.00 $328,567.33 $35188 951.32 $35,388, 175.00 $2~23. 68 $18,840.00 $10,000.00 7$8,840.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 BALANCES AND I+ OR -l TRANSFERS S32 294 537.77 S34 645 116.10 S34 680 190.72 [J~_l!fil!,462.00)~1!.QQ,75:J.87~$~,863,828.00 .=1l1,236 925.87 s TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCES SALARY FUND EXPENDITURES ADMINISTRATORS TEACHERS SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TUITION TOTAL SALARY FUND EXPENDITURES OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES REGUlAR PROGRAMS SPECIAL EDUCATION VOCATIONAL EDUCATION COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS PUPIL SUPPORT STAFF SUPPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRAL SUPPORT OTHER SUPPORT NON-BOND/NON -PFIOGRAM/COMMUNITY TOTAL OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE FUND EXPENDITURES PRINCIPAL INTEREST FISCAL FEES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES TOTAL SALARY, OPERATING AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 1990-1995 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED ~ $32,294,537. 7r_ $34,645,116.10 $34,680,100.72 $35,888,462.00 $2,274,595.94 $2,434,417.93 $2,389,830.0  $2,520,025.00 S 15,089,059.05 $17,222,527.5 $16,8 2,870.86 $17,8,700.00 $302,785.34 $326,529.22 $341,  15.27 $340,000.00 S 17 ,666,40.33 S 19,003,-47  .69 $19,574,116.17 $20, 70 , 725.00 $594,099.2 $533,289.66 $524,031.13 $525,775.00 $1,115,205.60 $1,089 105.75 $1,067,374.16 $1,100,000.00 $19,375,745.17 $21,605,870.10 $21,165,521.46 S22,330,500.00 $1,153,795.50 $1,519,965.24 $1 627 825. 45 $2,055,863.00 $232,079.61 $269,601.83 $327,404.86 $466,969.00 $312251.38 $245,349.38 $319065.38 $261,023.00 $588,813.72 $1,313 139.75 $782,927.75 $766,024.00 $78,334.88 $83 927.27 $82,727.23 $152,082.00 $495,775.16 $480,144.36 $466,769.73 $623,671.00 $738,318.88 $758 657.78 $795,427.64 $1,024,808.00 $406,405.63 $431,209.66 $449,835.91 $467,100.00 $658,100.37 $635,281.90 $629,584.22 $666,821.00 $5,906,876.04 $5,132,953.90 $5, 160, 194.84 $5,302,290.00 $265,134.68 $205,117.23 $186,702.32 $206,330.00 $135,915.49 $220,468.79 $225,795.84 $239,010.00 $9,885.00 $14,667.48 $5,604.29 $15,000.00 $10,001,686.34 $11,310,484.57 $11,059,865.46 $ I 2,246,991.00 $557,646.62 $637,259.78 $224,285.46 $440,155.00 $610,948.45 $556,636.89 $564,799.49 $724,985.00 $959.90 $967.94 $756.20 $1,560.00 St, 169,554.97 $1,194,864.61 $789,8  1.15 $1,166,700.00 $31 526,986.48 $34,111,219.28 $33,015,228.07 $35,744,191.00 $767,551.29 $533 896.82 $1 664,962.65 $144,271.00 6 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 PROJECTED BUDGETED CHANGE $36,000,753.87 $35,003,828.00 $1,236,925.87 $2,776,450.00 $2,725,450.00 ($51,000.00 $18,046,980.00 $18,124,550.00 $77,570.00 $378,880.00 $375,000.00 ($3,880.00 $21,202,310.00 $21,225,000.00 $22,690.00 $528,050.00 $525,000.00 ($3,050.00 $1,116,220.00 $1,120,000.00 $3,780.00 $22,846,580.00 $22,870,000.00 $23,420.00 $2,467 700.00 $2 165,550.00 ($302,150.00 $4e7,960.00 $394,450.00 ($93,510.00 $258,480.00 $234,960.00 ($23,500.00 $717,030.00 $815,020.00 $97,990.00 $159,170.00 $144,280.00 ($14,800.00 $648, 130.00 $525, 1 10.00 ($123,020.00 $1,091,500.00 $000, 110.00 ($111,300.00 $492830.00 $439,550.00 ($53,280.00 $606 560.00 $5 5,450.00 ($61,110.00 $5,241,300.00 $4,900,750.00 ($3 0,550.00 S 194,360.00 $175,700.00 ($18,660.00 $252,480.00 $224,050.00 ($28,430.00 $12,250.00 $15,000.00 $2,750.00 SI 2,629,750.00 $11,560,000.00 ($1,069,750.00 $474 845.00 $ 85,500.00 $10,655.00 $709,800.00 $710,000.00 $200.00 $4,125.00 $4,500.00 $375.00 $1,188,770.00 $ I ,200,000.00 $11,230.00 $36,665,100.00 $35,630,000.00 ($1,035,100.00 $235,653.87 $33,828.00 ($201,825.87 FEDERAL GRANTS BEGINNING BALANCE_S_ REVENUE EVEN START CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 MEDICAID NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 1990-1995 lllll0-111 111111-112 111112-113 111113-94 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED $11111127 .Ill $21111 1144.43 $3112 2811.73 $381,545.00 $134,430.00 $125,578.00 $122,31M1.00 SI 1811,71111.00 $1 152 3111.00 $1 111111 72.00 $1 661 000.00 $79,1104.00 $102 1134.1111 $73 515.00 $65,593.00 $36,771.00 $44,657.76 $39,11111.78 $41,000.00 SP ED PRESCHOOL !SECTION 8111 ANO ECCi $298,701.44 $354,585.00 $396 140.00 HEAD START so.oo $22 061.00 $48,646.00 $71 325.00 Tlll.E VI-B $300 321.00 $300,1115.00 $3011,238.00 $3111,554.00 Pl.. 811-313 $31 751.00 $27 4011.00 $21 704.00 $18 358.00 ~ HOMELESS ASSISTANCE $21 000.00 $21 875.00 JTPA $48 11111.511 $72 124.111 $114,151.311 $221 ,5117 .00 CARL PERKINS VOCATIONAL AID $87 872.14 $104 21111.00 $134 578.12 $148 411.00 EISENHOWER MATH/SCIENCE $20 777.00 $30 8711.00 $42,740.00 $42 000.00 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION $?3 207.00 $110 0118.00 $112 818.00 $112 II00.00 ASBESTOS HAZARD EMERGENCY $41 1110.00 EXXON ENERGY $53 020.00 $311705.00 $50 000.00 OTHER $0.00 $511040.00 $10 322.00 TOTAL REVENUE $18485e8.70 $2 494 3110.02 $3 1118 OII0. 211 $3 282 441.00 TOTAL EDERAL REVENUE AND BALANCE $2 038 11111.511 $2 794 034.45 $3 580,377.02 $3 1183 11811.00 EXPENDITURES REGULAR PROGRAMS $511 458.18 $311873.72 $32,270.110 $31 1175.00 SPECIAL EDUCATION $2711 7411.311 $347,537.08 $457 ,2111.111 $358 058.00 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION $73 001.04 $134 124.96 $1113,807.83 $222 780.00 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION $952 250.1111 $1 162,323.20 $1 355,723.69 $1 704,518.00 OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS $12 904.52 $11 565.80 $14 738.70 $11,612.00 PUPIL SUPPORT $119 4711.110 $287 414.75 $441,017.06 $621 01111.00 STAFF SUPPORT $145 397.44 $2114,392.34 $420,312.43 $5061107.00 BUSINESS SUPPORT $102 81111.51 $911,801.73 $121 7211.51 $114,041.00 OTHER/CENTRAL SUPPORT $5 793.20 $10 981.110 $28,71111.11 $15 500.00 NON-PROGRAMMED $27 441.05 $311844.41 $41,954.42 $59,11111.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES $13 170.54 $11 887.711 $101,258.83 $20 1711.00 TOTAL FEDERAL PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES $1 7H 552.111 $2 401 747.72 $3178 831.711 $3 1114 052.00 ENDING BALANCE $211111 144.43 $3112 2811.73 $381,545.23 $411 934.00 7 111113-94 11194-115 11194-115 PROJECTED BUDGETED CHANGE $381 2118.00 $251,538.00 ($1211750.00 $122 31111.00 $107,000.00 1$15 31111.00 $1 5113,471.00 $1,1100,000.00 $11 5211.00 $115,5113.00 $113 700.00 $28 107.00 $47 1118.00 $47,000.00 !$1118.00 $3116, 140.00 $400,000.00 $3,8110.00 $71 325.00 $72,000.00 $675.00 $3111554.00 $320,000.00 $4411.00 $18 410.00 $111 500.00 1$1 1110.00 $21 875.00 $21 000.00 1$875.00 $210 000.00 $75,000.00 ($135 000.00 $148 411.00 $147,200.00 ($1 211.00 $42 000.00 $40 000.00 1$2 000.00 $85 230.00 $110 000.00 1$25 230.00 $0.00 $114 831.00 1$84 831.00 $10 322.00 $1100.00 1$11722.00 $3 238 7211.00 $3 000,000.00 1$2311 7211.00 $3 1118 012.00 $3 251 5311.00 1$3811 4711.00 $281175.00 $30 000.00 $1 325.00 $375 1185.00 $350 000.00 !$251185.00 $198 250.00 $170,000.00 1$28 250.00 $1 885 770.00 $1 310,000.00 1$375 770.00 $15 030.00 $5,000.00 1$10 030.00 $543 930.00 $500,000.00 1$43,1130.00 $425 7IIO.OO $500,000.00 $74 210.00 $43 SCIO.DO $110 000.00 $1111140.00 $23,5110.00 $15,000.00 1$8 5IIO.00 $50.000.00 $50 000.00 $0.00 $22,470.00 $10,000.00 1$12 470.00 $3,412 450.00 $3 000 000.00 !$412 450.00 $205 5112.00 $251,538.00 $45 974.00 EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION\nOBJECT\nAND FUNCTION/OBJECT FOR SALARY (01) OPERATING (02) AND DEBT SERVICE (04) FUND FN 01 10 02 10 02 11 01 11 02 11 01 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 -- - - 01 11 1--- 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 01 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 02 11 -- C DESCRIPTION 00 INSTRUCTION 00 INSTRUCTION 05 PRESC-HOOL - - - 1~0- K- IN-D- ER- GAR-TE--N 10 KINDERGARTEN 26 ELEMENTARY - - - ---- 20 ELEMENTARY - - -- 21 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 22 LANGUAGE ARTS -23 MA THE--M--A- TICS 24 SCIENCE ------ 28 READING ------ -- 30 MIDDLE SCHOOL ----- 30 MIDDLE SCHOOL - -- 31 MUSIC - - -- 32 LANGUAGE ARTS 33 MATHEMATICS __ _ 34 SCIENCE 35 SOCIAL STUDIES 36 SPEECH \u0026amp; DRAMA 37 ART 39 PHYS-IC_A_L_E_D_U_C_A-TION 40 HIGH SCHOOL 40 HiGH SCH_O_O__ L 41 MUSIC - -- - - 42 LANGUAGE ARTS 43 MATHEMATICS 44 SCIENCE - 91-92 EXPENSES 16,640,.06.31 - - - 500,554.8Q - - ~1,611_._8 0.00 --- - f------ --- 11,966.44 0.00 -- - 130,099.54 - -- - - - :!_0,427.34 0.00 -- - - - 0.00 0.00 -- - 708.00 0.00 - -- 45,297.80 --- 1,189.60 3,021.43 -- - 1,793.17 - 2,582.32 1,415.44 21.54 -- 863.40 1,254.52 - 0.00 - 72,705.1.! 1_2,323 . !5 872.23 - - - - 1,0Q1.4Q 4,200.43 --- - - -- - 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD - ---- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119,761.99 177,882.00 114,835.09 64.56% 1,125,722.30 1,189,300.00 912,211.53 76.70% 93,805.50 97,790.00 84,256.21 86.16% 4,942,200.72 5,215,600.00 4,524,450.87 86.75% 513,465.65 689,428.00 488,544.96 70.86% 2,451.76 3,900.00 4,285.45 109.88% 21.57 - 0.00 0.00 556.76 0.00 0.00 72.22 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,025,258.66 2,135,000.00 2,042,866.33 95.68% 253,749.33 330,986.00 256,968.63 77.64% 934.71 12,665.00 7,463.48 58.93% 1,197.49 1,375.00 1,139.79 - 82.89% 1,598.93 5,875.00 11,290.73 192.18% 3,633.06 2,398.00 2,303.78 96.07% 716.89 1,475.00 1,056.22 71.61% 81.61 50.00 0.00 0.00% 1,zQz.13 2,580.00 1,363.08 52.83% - - 72- 1- .1- 3 820.00 387.13 47.21% 3,126,!3!..lQ 3,624,100.00 ~. 191,~~z.~~ 88.06% - 329,844.19 4~~.805.00 36_!,41~.55 74.86% - --- 56,440.14 1~.~5Q_.QQ_ 1~.~~1-~1 99.00% --- 1,154.39 1 .~50.00 1,Q~6-?1 82.94% - 7,228.82 1,200.QQ 863.68 71.97% - - ---- 2,811.59 2,500.00 3,045.56 121.82% - - - - ==-=--= 'll'HHlitA ~ @lRtll'llll ll4H'1r'1r!LIlEfi l.(Q)CCIJFKl1 JlfilIT,,,!ICCCC lf!l(Q)@JL~ J1'W ~\nl 1\" Jl WW,11li i,\u0026gt;~P'1l~l Q)l1'1['UJIRZUl1IB,'l f 11~'1lJ~CC'1l'Il(Q)~ ll~'l()l {ID)~'\n)'\n~~)('Jiln~ll[)o/ (( j) Jlj J~ CITllJDlf~(tn1~ C O)~J 2..m.t xenrt 11'WTICC~i!'l2_ - - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of FUND FNC DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD - --- - --- 02 1145 SOCIAL STUDIES 1,002.1~ 917.14 1,200.00 1,387.56 115.63% -- --- - - - 02 1146 SPEECH AND DRAMA 193.49 353.19 800.00 0.00 0.00% ---- f--- 02- 1147- ART 2,928.52 2,854.22 1,900.00 ~687.48 - 141.45% 02 1148 RADIO/TV 1,508.67 2,029.62 0.00 0.00 - - 02 1149 PHYSICAL EDUCATIO N 626.38 587.40 650.00 416.10 64.02% - - - --- - 02 1150 ATHLETICS 16,000.00 922.50 1,000.00 18,183.60 1818.36% 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 02 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 02 1153 COMBINED ATHLETI - 44,760.72 48,525.33 50,600.00 42,277.56 83.55% f- ~!.~~9:ZQ 19,121.21 24,360.00 10,460.90 42.94% - - ------- - cs 3,984.37 8,292.74 1,290.00 16,178.51 1254.15% 02 1154 GIRLS SOFTBALL 0.00 0.00 0.00 376.54 02 1160 STUDENT ACTIVITIE - -- s 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,842.85 02 1161 CHEER- -- - --- - - - ~ -- - --- - -- 4,4~,1.36 2,964.59 9,950.00 11,786.45 118.46% 02 1162 DRILL 02 - 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL --- - ~~923.22 1,875.46 7,115.00 0.00 - 0.00% -- - 3,842.06 89,059.92 240,420.00 84,663.39 35.21% 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 02 1193 MiNf GRANTS - - - ~.976.22 18,601.08 20,400.00 19,298.46 94.60% ~ ---- 4,803.99 4,630.44 5,000.00 4,315.95 86.32% 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER - SCHOOL 2,564.76 29,669.41 64,887.00 27,217.34 41.95% 02 1195 SATURDAY DETENT ION 14.97 5,465.74 6,000.00 5,110.96 85.18% 01 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUC - - - TION 0.00 75,015.07 78,000.00 67,926.22 87.08% --- - - 02 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUC TION 2,164.67 5,786.21 7,700.00 5,016.89 65.15% of 1220 RESOURCE ROOM- 02 1220 RESOURCE ROOM -- - 0.00 1,164,399.94 1,230,000.00 1,293,~61.78 105.17% -- - - 1,649.09 88,209.13 90,750.00 98,407.69 108.44% 02 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 1:15 01- 1240 SPECIAL CLASS 1:10 02 1240 SPECIALCLASS 1:10 01 1250 SPECIAL CLASS,1:6 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS7:6 02 1260 PRIVATE DAY SCHO - 8,525.59 5,832.17 0.00 0.00 -- - f--- --- --- - 0.00 659,049.10 695,300.00 4_1Z,346.~~ 64.34% -- \u0026gt;--- - - 705.99 49,077.48 Q~.830.00 4~.~~Q-~~ 75.70% - - - 0.00 188,Q~5.82 241,700.00 14~.3~~-Z~ 61.81% --- - 5,198.37 28,486.45 81 ,7~0.00 24,43_.75 29.88% -- - ----- -- OL 0.00 2,212.~0 0.-00 0.00 Page: 9 ~ -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of FUND FNCT DESCRIPTION -EXPE-N- SES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD t----- 02 1271 ACT 591 HANDICAPPED, RESI _ 10,024.76 8,629.20 10,000.00 11,066.1 110.67% - 02 1272 ACT 591, NON-HANDICAPPED 18,486.72 17,571.13 15,000.00 30,291.27 201.94% - 01 1280 -PUB---L--IC DAY--- -S--CHOOL - - 0.00 130,713.72 138,100.00 114,482.87 82.90% - 02 1280 PU-BLIC DAY SCHOOL - 0.00 12,889.62 18,550.00 11,478.24 61.88% - 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PROGRA 0.00 0.00 12,425.00 11,992.33 96.52% 02 1290 01 1320 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDICAP - 62,552.27 108,711.27 166,932.00 146,855._~1 87.97% DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION - -- 0.00 80,524.69 85,000.00 79,145.24 93.11% 02 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION - -- - - 4,247.10 10,733.13 11,974.00 9,633.82 80.46% 01 1330 B-USINESS EDUCATION 0.00 366,005.06 386,300.00 359,642\".69- 93.10% --- - - - 02 1330 BUS- IN--E--SS EDUCATION --- -- 48,913.85 68,227.45 56,581.00 62,999.94 111.34% 01 1350 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 0.00 259,903.38 274,500.00 258,396.36 94.13% 02 1350 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 30,599.28 77,329.25 54,689.00 63,813.12 116.68% 01 1352 02 1352 P-RIN--CIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY 0.00 63,137.94 66,700.00 62,027.07 92.99% r-- PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY 33,336.43 33,933.71 6,300.00 5,578.37 88.55% 02 1354 TELEVISION PRODUCTION - 0.00 13,957.82 0.00 0.00 01 1360 HOME EC 0.00 286,119.03 301,900.00 256,288.47 84.89% 02 1360 HOME EC 12,474.25 34,395.05 43,498.00 37,752.71 86.79% 01 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 0.00 48,449.20 51,300.00 49,495.38 96.48% -- 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 3,588.51 9,231.33 7,000.00 5,915.74 84.51% 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 0.00 0.00 5,600.00 4,546.77 81.19% 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 0.00 363,105.62 383,200.00 322,824.37 84.24% 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 13,340.44 71,257.64 - 76,381.00 ~.665.Q! 87.28% 02 1510 02 1520 BASIC SKILLS 0.00 0.00 5,690.00 1,226.04 21.55% -- r--- DROPOUT PREVENTION 16,991.62 19,931.81 20,604.00 12,31~I1 59.77% -- - 02 1522 TRANSITION PROGRAM - 0.00 11,798.37 ~~~0.00 - _!Q,240.~~ 75.02% 02 1525 02 1550 02 1560 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 191,523.81 223,574.19 223,941.00 245,~?~-~:! 109.61% EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC t--- ---- -- 97,049.54 124,898.65 1 _:!.Z,8~4.0Q 94,~11 -~6 80.02% READING- - - --0.00- 0.00- 68,800.00 58,519.64 85.06% - Page: 10 FUND 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02- 01 \"Jl'Hlll~ BCO)]Rs.1I'HIfLi ,II1r\"lr'JL,J_m\u0026amp; @CClt IMlJ]])l.L,]l(C (C]HJ(Q)(Q)JL5 Jl ( h'1JJ l \"Jl ~\u0026lt;JJ11il~l\u0026gt; }li)~P1]io'\\1'].l})T['TfUJIR\u0026lt;JI~B 3l'f fl1'l[J~CC'1I'Il(Q)~ ll\u0026lt;'UY\\1')l)1t/g L~ru1TTt-1lql0cJ'mn ) \u0026gt;0 (li)IP)~lr~1(rfi1m~ @~ 0 J[l) \"~~ ~ll'WilCC~(l@41,p FN C DESCRIPT 15 15 15 65 * 75 * ION MP ED 15 90 OTHER CO -91 COMP -E-D P-A--RENT/HO-MEW--OR-K 15 92 COMP ED ELE EXTEND DAY - - - 15 93 COMP ED TURNING POINT - - --- - - - - 15 94 COMP ED PALS LAB - --- -- -- - - 19 10 GIFTED AN D TALENTED ~19 10 GIFTED AN D TALENTED - - - - -- - 1-9 11 GIT PROJE CT PROMISE . - -- 19 11- GIT -PROJE CT PROMISE 19 12 GIT SUMM ER QUEST - --- - 19 1-3 -GIT- M- ATH EMATI-CS - 19 1-4 GIT SC---I-EN CE -- - 19 90 OTHER IN STRUCTIONAL SERV 19 -- --- 92 MCRAT LA NGUAGE ARTS GRAN -- 20 00 SUPPORT ING SERVICES 270il i SUPPORT ING SERVICES 21 21 21 21 21 --- 00 PUPIL SUP 01 02 * --- 10 ATTEND \u0026amp; 20 GUIDANCE - PORT - - -- SOCIAL WRK SEV /COUNSELING SERV ---- 21 21 21 21 21 20- G-UIDANCE /COUNSELING -SERV 23 APPRAISA L SERVICES 30 HEALTHS 31 JOHNSON 40 PSYCHOL ERVICES - - \u0026amp; JOHNSON GRANT OGICAL SERVICES - ---- - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES -- - ~.17!-~~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 - - -- - ---- ~.~85.54 0.00 0.00 - - ---- 76~.Q32.12 152,333.13 187,120.00 122,250.! -- _118,268.33 115,841.03 101,700.00 76,494.83 - 24,685.40 29,957.18 0.00 499.93 - 43,408.77 42,826.09 44,350.00 35,852.!~ -- - 53,180.16 58,295.09 24,300.00 10,961.74 45,411.36 405,353.20 428,300.00 326,906.18 27,689.4Q 67,758.57 75,500.00 42,402.93 -- - 0.00 10,040.08 0.00 0.00 57.85 2,424.63 11,000.00 7,522.09 -- --- 3,048.70 2,675.74 18,250.00 13,767\u0026amp;! -~00.00 7,149.61 20,803.00 19,714.71 0.00 0.00 21,100.00 0.00 0.00 2,718.68 4,835.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 594.00 0.00 4,934,623.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 1,463,766.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 552.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,392.85 54,612.91 0.00 0.00 - --- 169,523.70 166,860.00 0.00 0.00 ---- 0.00 15,669.53 73,000.00 - 62,Q46.~~ 0.00 843,592.20 890,800.00 __ 800,09Z.8 3,147.51 170,218.18 176,230.00 - 163,64~-~~ _ 36,955.59 - J_4,044.28 __ 11900.00 _!.!_,59~-~! - 89,061.05 - 86,756.63 116,8?0.0Q ~6,50Q.1~ 0.00 0.00 352.00 0.00 -- -- ----- - - - 0.00 167,900.00 164,927.67 -- - - -- - 158,965.0~ Page: 11 --_] % of EXP/BUD 65.33% 75.22% 80.84% 45.11% 76.33% - - 56.16% 68.38% 75.44% 94.77% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% - -- 86.09% 89.82% 92.86% 83.42% 74.05% --- 0.00% 98.23% - - - 1l'H)[M X~ @]RZ'Jr!U1Ll ll'1l'1l'lL1l]~R l@calrtI:F UJiffiJLITra~ ((WJl(IT)(IT)]L,~ n ~ J~\u0026lt;ni\u0026gt;, , n ~ ~q11)~ Ht)XjP%~~kIT JH1cu11RzI1IB:iW 'H l'HYB\u0026lt;U'11'll@JNY ]:i'HH 11LJ1Lt i ,~mil,l1 \\lf' q( f)) ll l ~ (0))1J1(.t'~Ha' illTTllil~ ccp~ i ll\u0026gt;J(t'JllN~r lFY'I!(G\u0026lt;e@1 ,f\\,n - -- 93-94 - 91-92 92-93 93-94 % of FUND FNCT DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD ---- - - - --- - --- 02 2140 PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES 58,42Q.17 ___Q,707.6!! 71,400.00 12,892.27 18.06% -- -- - - - - 01 2150 SPEECH PATH/AUDIOLOGY SER 0.00 387,373.48 4 ! 0,700.00 326,766.~!! 79.56% - - -- - - 02 2150 SPEEC-H PAT-H/AU- DIOLOGY SE-R 26,54~.31 71,168.22 155,817.00 J_46,83~.1Q 94.23% 01 2160 PHYS \u0026amp; OCC THERAPY 0.00 62,688.24 66,!Q0.00 57,867.66 87.55% - ---- - - 02 2160 PHYS- \u0026amp; -OCC T-H-ERAPY 0.00 4,686.25 4,8Q0.00 4,410.z~ 91.89% - - -- 02 2190 OTHER PUPIL SUPPORT SERV 0.00 34,518.96 700.00 3,824.2~ 546.32% - - - -- - - 02 2191 ROCKEFELLER ED RENEWAL 0.00 0.00 _J__,302.00 0.00 0.00% - - - - --- - 02 2193 NATL SCIENCE FOUND GRANT 0.00 0.00 7,500.00 7,514.17 100.19% 02 2194 - - - - - - - AASA A-DVISE GRANT- - 0.00 0.00 1,850.00 0.00 0.00% 01 2210 INSTRUCTION/SUPERVISION 0.00 415,391.85 439,700.00 538,264.35 122.42% 02 2210 INSTRUCTION/SUPERVISION- - - 133,560.57 358,615.51 589,571.00 397,716.82 67.46% 02 2211 INSTRUCTION COE/NCA - 3,972.14 4,112.74 11,000.00 4,754.38 43.22% - 02 2212 -E-LEME-N-TARY INSERV- ICE - - 717.67 - 0.00 --- 0.00 0.00 01 2215 CH I ADM/INSTRUCTION 0.00 . 13,987.57 15,300.00 29,869.36 195.22% 02 2215 CR i ADM/INSTRUCTION 0.00 6,349.67 6,650.00 7,905.37 118.88% 02 2216 CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK 0.00 18,80 1,981.00 277.01 13.98% ----- 02 2217 CELEBRATION OF TEACHING 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,058.82 105.88% 02 2218 INSERVICE-ADE READ GRANT 5,297.80 15,138.45 4,440.00 11,480 . .Q.1 258.56% 02 2219 INSERVICE-ADE/UALR/UCA 10,879.02 3,087.45 11,935.00 1,024.26 8.58% - 01 2220 EDUCATION MEDIA SERVICES 0.00 587,960.59 611,800.00 505,186.75 82.57% 02 2220 EDUCATION MEDIA SERVICES 116,339.47 389,728.15 409,863.00 - 366,246.~~ 89.36% 02 2225 INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER 16,285.37 18,376.87 25,500.00 30,040.47 117.81% - 02 2295 * 0.00 3,432.93 0.00 - -- -- 0.00- 02 2310 01 2320 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 244,669.24 256,980.24 251,500.00 1_!1!, ! ~-17 76.02% SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE - 754.00 84,204.50 ~~.00Q.00 90,Q~~.3~ 101.23% - - - - --- - - --- 02 2320 SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE 5,339.37 64,552.63 68,Q~0.00 1.1,242.~Q 103.37% -- - 01 2321 ASST SUPT INSTRUCTION 0.00 56,890.69 0,200.00 _ _1_, 1Q~-~11 02.01% - - --- ---- - - - --- 02 2321 ASST SUPT INST-RUCT- ION 540.00 28,456.94 30~140.00 31,116.57 103.-24%- Page: 12 - -- ~ - - =--=---- - - -=-===----= 'j['JlllM k Y@JR1'1T1lLllHl '1!''1l'JL,!Rm @ci::m~W ID'lffiILil\u0026lt;D~ er IHl@(Q)ll, Jl ~)~qJ)l C, n ,ef\\, l~)Xifl14~0)ll'1rUJlR3J\u0026amp; Iffilf 1PllJ~CC'1fJI(Q)JNY Jli'HH1 1w~{~~~) ii\\flfuu~ qQl)Jl1 ,9C D)filc_e1r1IDgfid1@m~~D 2 lliXeilNt 1FWficcd@41,)2_ J - - ---- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of FUND FNC DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD 01 2322 ASST SUPT BUSINES - - - - S SERVIC 0.00 55,764.93 58,900.00 60,247.~~ 102.29% -- - 02 2322 ASST SUPT BUSINES S SERVIC 795.00 28,921.34 31,600.00 31,821.22 100.70% 01 2323 ASST SUPT PUPIL SE RVICES 0.00 55,925.22 58,900.00 60,234.46 102.27% - - - -- --- 02 2323 ASST SUPT PUPIL SE 01 2324 ASST SUPT DESEGR RVICES 1,135.83 30,917.11 31,140.00 31,734.27 101.91% ------ EGATION 0.00 52,149.08 55,100.00 56,325.94 102.22% 02 2324 ASST SUPT DESEGR- -- - - - ---- EGATION- -- _ 3,643.07 40,007.65 53,800.00 43,728.43 81.28% 01 2400 PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE 02 2400 PRiNCIPAL'S OFFICE 01 2410 ASST PRINCIPAL'S 0 02 2410 ASST PRINCIPAL'S O - - - -0.00 1,040,705.36 1,058,300.00 1,032,770.~~ 97.59% 43,~96.74 596,111.12 636,369.00 626,313.59 98.42% FFICE 0.00 449,509.91 508,300.00 543,068.1_~_ 106.84% --- - - FFICE 111.29 33,473.10 34,765.00 40,894.37 117.63% 02 2510 BUSINESS SUPPORT 01 2540 M \u0026amp; O OF PLANTIER --- - SERVICES ~986.12 104,622.58 111,100.00 113,736.94 102.37% ViCES 0.00 55,794.93 58,900.00 60,272.50 102.33% 02 2540 M \u0026amp; 0 OF PLANT SER VICES 4,225,030.45 3,873,345.31 1,279,850.00 1,404,537.75 109.74% 02 2541 M \u0026amp; O-CUSfoDIAi SE - RVICES 193,241.49 0.00 1,208,710.00 1,156,872.64 95.71% 02 2543 ASBESTOS REMOVA - - L 24,481.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2544 ENERGY CONSERVA ----- TION 431,614.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2549 M \u0026amp; 0 UTILITIES \u0026amp; IN SUR 0.00 0.00 1,419,500.00 1,331,769.88 93.82% 02 2550 PUPIL TRANSPORTAT 02 2555 MAGNET/M-TO-M TRA - - ION SER 906,532.35 1,121,656.19 1,254,780.00 1,075,466.~~ 85.71% - NSP. - -- 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 29,719.62 01 2570 INTERNAL SERVICES ,_02---2-570 INTERNAL SERVICES -- - 0.00 55,795.01 58,900.00 60,285~~ 102.35% 31,345.30 60,570.76 92,850.00 ~.782.33 122.54% - 02 2571 2,327.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2630 INFORMATION SERV 01 2640 PERSONNEL SERVIC - --- ICES 11,022.95 35,111.12 33,550.00 _ 33,~88.~~ 101.01 % -- ES 0.00 55,794.96 58,900.00 60,285.84 102.35% 02 2640 PERSONNEL SERVIC - - -- ------ --- ES 4,218.19 31,535.66 34,390.00 35,335.68 102.75% I- -- ---- 01 2660 DATA PROCESSING S 02 2660 DATA PROCESSING S ERVICES 0.00 45,833.07 48,500.00 - ~~.~II-~~ 100.16% ERVICES 34,120.95 120,055.54 - 138,390.00 - 138,~55.~~ 100.41% 02 2900 OTHER SUPPORTING SERVICES 0.00 890.00 :hQO~ 5.~~8.6? 583.87% - - - - - -- - Page: 13 FUND FNCT 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 04 04 04 2901 2902 2905 3700 3900 4100 4100 4400 4900 5100 5101 5102 'll 1lllllt1 Xj '@JR{TI'HILll H'lr1lI LJE IRl@\u0026lt;DOJCF UJIB3ILIIC\u0026lt;CU lH.I(Q)@IL Jl\u0026lt; ~\u0026gt;J 1,J, 1W 1\\, l~~\\JP'l~~IDllTI'UJIRllJ:I\u0026amp;B3 1fI'I ~'llJ~CC1fII@~ ll1'Hn 1J1yc~~\nr ~~1Jl'ctllt'~' 1CfJ\u0026gt;l1ll~ \u0026lt;P)J1i)ce]1'1IDtr@fin~nD~2 illJ Ilrt ll'Wlicc@41,D ------- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD CROSSIN-G GUAR- DS 0.00 0.00 57,010.00 54,445.94 95.50% BREAKFAST/LUN-CH AIDES - 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 180,459.20 103.12% VIPS - -- -- - - 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 4,461.46 74.36% NO-N--PUBLIC SCHOOL PUPIL S- - 34.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES 2,968.63 425.33 3,000.00 12,514.39 417.15% PAYMENTS TO OTHERS - 136,593.66 1,067,374.16 1,100,000.00 687,523.34 62.50% PAYMENTS TO OTHERS 952,512.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 3,472.21 0.00 0.00 -PAY-ME- NT T-O--- STATE -- - 11,698.85 5,178.96 12,000.00 12,253.92 102.12% BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 1,139,188.69 711,056.79 1,118,255.00 1,130,326.40 101.08% BONDED INDEBTEDNESS-PCSS 20,721.89 43,619.74 23,350.00 0.00 0.00% ---- BONDED INDEBTEDNESS-LR 34,954.03 35,164.62 35,095.00 0.00 0.00% GR- AND- TOTALS 34,904,530.07 33,015,228.07 36,126,357.00 31,928,393.22 88.38% Page: 14 \"Hl,ll ll ~ n(Ll)1 R tll'H H 1L II1 r1r 1L1I lii m @CCI~I FUJIIBILcIcI cc rm@@ IL~ TIi ll\u0026gt;~ Jl,,r t W\"'1,H t1'lJP)Jl$f'TIO)l(1I'UJIBlIBllB'if~ ( Q)ffi?\u0026gt;JJIBCC1r ll1'Uf\u0026gt;l-lW~'g 5~t'a1fil'.-d1@H)ln' D2 @UD\u0026lt;r)ina11tnim1~@ ~ D~ I.D)!hllr cel.l\"~jicc d@,D(1 , 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 Fund Object DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES 01 00110 REGULAR QE_R_T!_FIC_A_IED 17,066,397 ~~ 16,742,398.94 17,738,600.00 15,511,796:95 02 00110 REGU_LA_CR_ E~TiflCATED ~~08~.24 359,620.58 723,316.00 539,076.29 01 00115 C!=~TlflED AQ!Yl!_N 2,529,94I_.2_ 2~,4_9_0~,3_0_1_ .92_~6,6 _21_265, .00 2,666,665.55 02 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 54,920.88 _ 15,403.00 37,760.00 31,900.82 02 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATE 4,436,627.20 4,433,555.87 4,702,169.00 4,510,777.43 02 00125 NON-CERTIFIED ADMIN - 303,770.74 222,770.10 215,725.00 220,790.96 - ---- -- - --- 01 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 281,727.57 280,000.00 307,072.20 02 - 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS - 257,721.90 2,385.56 63,219.00 200.00 01-00131 AIG_N~Q SU_BS_TIT_U_TE-_S_ 0.00 59,687.70 60,000.00 71,807.90 02 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 68,807.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 J % of EXP/BUD 87.45% 74.53% 101.54% ~.48% 95.93% 102.35% 109.67% 0.32% 119.68% t------,------,--1 02 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 16,517.00 22,268.10 22,500.00 24,835.20 110.38% 01 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ,--~_____,,o--,.o~o 02 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 17,971.35 24,500.38 57,845.00 26,150.59 ,__45-.2-1-0/i--\u0026lt;o 02 0015'1 STIPENDS NON-CERTIFIED - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 450.00 1,300.95 - -----+----'--- 02 00156 STIPENDS-OTHER NON-CER 0.00 0.00 t--------+----1--50.00 0.00 01 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,469,783.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -~~---1------=-+-----,--,--c--c-,-,---,-,--t------ 02 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 20,199.93 1,474,276.85 1,538,210.00 1,423,565.24 289.10% 0.00% 01 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -----i 02 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 384,244.37 346,599.03 368,649.00 353,712.78 02 00212  TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 4,483.00 2,000.38 02 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 44.00 99.52 02 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 848.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.95% 44.62% 226.18% 02 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CER! 91.13 -- 0. 00 t----2-=--.-c-10c--c5c-_o,....,o-+------O-.O-O -=- 0~ 02 00230 #* UNDEFINED ACCOUNT*# 69,128.74 _ 0.00 _0_.0Q 0.00 02 00231 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SY 0.00 _ 6~,632.4~ 67,94Q.00 1----58-,5-8-8.68 -8-6-.2-4-li-10 cf-1 00240 i_NSU_R_A__N__C E -=~ 533,289.66 52~,031.1~ __5 25.?Z~-QQ_ 448,047.60 85.22% ~ -~4Q INSURANCE _ 18,261.50 7,233.85 15,409.00 _ 22,497.18 146.QQ'.\u0026amp; Page: 15 Fund Object 02 00241 01 00250 02 00250 02 00251 01 00260 -- -02 - -00-260 02 00261 \u0026gt;0-1- 00290 02 00310 02 00311 02 0031--2 02 -0031-3 02 00314 1------ 02 00315 02 00316 02 00317 02 00318 02 00319 02 00320 02 00321 - -- 02 00322 02 00323 -02 00324 02 00325 02 00326 02 00327 -02 00328 02 00329 1t'Hlll~ ~@IRi'H'lllI JL,II'Tr1f!.LIIEfi l.@\u0026lt;DOIFC1 1JIB3ILII~\u0026lt;\u0026lt;DD IHI@@IL n ~ n,, Jl~ ,11, J.E)XJf)IaWJD)II\"lfUJIB1.ImE lf @JJIB\u0026lt;D1r ):1'\\[J!')1l))  3)/Zalilffi.lHc)tCJ ' IDil ll~ ~~ ll'ffi}lJ~ C ID~D 2 ITI\u0026gt;Ib:ilJ (r)lf'YTI\u0026lt;Cc tC ID4)1L _ 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES INSURA~CE, NON-CE~T 179,457 -l!!_ 160,878.40 179,120.00 147,615.11 UNEMPLOYMENTCOMPENS __ 8,313.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNEMPLOYMENTCOMPENS -- - 116.46 25,064.50 33,773.00 16,8~._1Q UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CER 7,111.26 7,997.67 9,223.00 3,907.58 - - - - WORKERS COMP 13,663.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 WORKERS COMP 137.35 13,177.96 15,493.00 23,104.34 ---- --- -- '{VORKERS COMP, NON-CER - 3,801.42 3,032.38 4,766.00 5,310.35 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 10,_Q00.00 9,361.00 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SER 243,960.75 227,589.66 196,157.00 170,692.94 CONSOLIDATION LAWSUITS 107,137.00 77,853.85 80,000.00 73,010.70 LEGAL SERVICES 16,233.36 42,489.33 40,000.00 30,620.30 ELECTION SERVICES 4,274.53 9,734.22 9,500.00 8,636.03 DESEGREGATION MONITOR 58,845.98 41,211.61 60,000.00 50,322.00 AUDIT SERVICES 15,500.00 15,700.00 15,950.00 15,950.00 SECURITY SERVICES 44,851.98 43,605.93 44,900.00 43,362.03 MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTE 25,000.00 50,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICL 7,093.98 8,664.68 7,350.00 14,008.71 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDIN 3,160.10 6,025.66 4,800.00 1,700.00 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 0.00 22,795.45 27,187.00 13,923.22 UTITLITY SERVICES-GAS 204,132.95 212,020.84 235,100.00 208,470.80 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECT 826,922.63 764,066.41 779,000.00 724,543.99 UTILTITY SERVICES-WATER 67,914.86 61,988.98 66,800.00 63,665.09 CLEANING SERVICES 1,538.15 275.74 900.00 459.98 REPAIRS/MAINT-BLD/GRNDS 24,577.95 45,546.71 41,000.00 47,412.78 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 94,459.28 103,340.24 99,123.00 82,410.40 \u0026gt;------- REPAIRS/MAINT-BUSNEHICL 21,269.85 12,860.03 10,120.00 25,01..79 500.00 ~- REPAIRS/MAINT-SEC SYSTE 530.67 1,702.13 ___ 2,34~.__!Q WASTE DISPOSAL ---- - - - 60,433.53 - 35,571.8~_ 54,100.00 49.~57.62 Page: 16 % of EXP/BUD 82.41% 49.84% ---- 42.37% -~ 149.13% 111.42% 93.61% 87.02% 91.26% 76.55% 90.91% 83.87% 100.00% 96.57% 0.00% 190.59% 35.42% 51.21% 88.67% 93.01% 95.31% 51.11% 115.64% 83.14% ---- 247.19% 468.42% --- 91.05% -- -- - -- ---- 'll'Hlll~ ).W DJR{\"Jl'llf1! Jl'1f'1f'lLl~!R l@CCJI:fKllJ TIBlLllCC CCHll@@IL, n WWJ l. .J l ~,1\\, l~\ni.'(JP1'H~IDH'1rUJmI\u0026amp;3 lIB'W(' D)JB3Jl!R(C'1r Jti-Hn1 'll2J''~g, c,~ta1Hl'ilu~cr mn r,9@ nj)lt'))rfd1t1firn1~ ~D2 IIDIIDrcre 1rWficc @~D---=,----- _] 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fund Object DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD 02 00331 PUPIL T-RAN-SPO- RTATION ~1!Z81 -~1 78,784.03 184,646.00 48,543.89 --- 26.29% 02 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 22,64~.4~ 16,933.70 40,491.00 19,780.33 48.85% 02 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 16,1~8.1~ 17,993.55 34,935.00 24,985.38 71.52% 02 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 32,482.5Q__ 23,055.00 23,875.00 22,736.06 - 95.23% 02 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 10,227.24 13,495.00 10,311.13 76.41% -11,184.29 ---- 02 00340 REPAIRS-TELEPHONE 573.58 0.00 0.00 --- 02 00341 TELEPHONE 142,818.54 118,770.02 143,739.00 135,225.20 94.08% - - - 02 00342 POSTAGE 29,164.08 18,348.12 38,615.00 36,056.38 93.37% - 1------- ADVERTISING - 02 00350 785.36 1,245.92 1,350.00 2,279.27 168.83% 1-- -- WRECKER SERVICE - -- 02 00355 0.00 1,940.00 2,000.00 2,490.00 124.50% t-- 1-- - ---- -- 02 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 20,894.63 26,086.14 35,149.00 15,484.55 44.05% 02 00361 D-ATA- -PROCESSING --SERVIC 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00% 01 00370 TUITION 0.00 21,988.00 20,000.00 21,047.00 105.24% ---- - 02 00370 TUITION 45,813.98 45,400.33 36,000.00 50,177.88 139.38% -- - 01 00371 TUTION - PCSSD 136,593.66 122,087.84 130,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 00371 TUTION - PCSSD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 00372 TUITION-MAGNET 0.00 923,298.32 950,000.00 666,476.34 - 70.16% 02 00372 TUITION - MAGNET 935,209.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 2,012.61 11,800.00 8,541.86 72.39% 02 00383 FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 0.00 1,158.51 0.00 0.00 M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES -- 02 00385 0.00 2,044.00 10,373.00 0.00 0.00% ---- 02 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVIC 11,698.85 5,178.96 64,980.00 33,844.10 52.08% --- 02 00391 PHOTOGRAPHY 224.57 222.43 300.00 367.28 122.43% TRASH/WASTE SERVICES 0.00 1,094.94 --- 02 00392 0.00 0.00 ----- --- 02 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVIC 0.00 __ __1A10.00 7,800.00 __?,94~.00 37.76% 1--- ARCH/ENG SERVICES - 02 00395 163.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---- 02 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 5,180.97 3,500.00 15,600.QQ_ ~.87~-~Q -18.41% - - 02 00399 NORTH CENTRAL VISITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - -- - -- - - Page: 17 - 1l'llllllt K Y\u0026lt;D)lRtll'lH1L( ,Il1l'1CILJIF3l @CC~ IJ\u0026gt;llJiffilLil\u0026lt;CC CIHl@@l.L,~ ll ~l'i}) Jlu ll illJ/4,H'l,~ 1~1P!~~[1)1[1r'LlJIR3.mJI~B 'lY('Q )lfilJJI\u0026amp;(G11' H~'HJ~kl[2 J~1g ~L~atlltiitH'' @JIj /9 (O)lIJ)(t'.\n]F~lftfilln~ .co1~D~2I I (_e)JI'W'D, @41,1'_ J 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fund Object DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD 02 00401 SUPP~S, TOOLS \u0026amp; SM EQU 0.00 ~.15~ 3,Q00.00 2,997.74 99.92% --- 02 00405 SALES AND USE TAX 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00% --- - ---- 02 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS !! 1 ~.315.~5 549,757.65 625,779.00 581,757.09 92.97% ------ ----- 02 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS _!!i,1Q,65 66,375.02 9,750.00 53,077.17 544.38% - - ---- 02 00412 SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL 32,377.74 55,842.24 45,000.00 40,833.08 90.74% 1-- SUPPLIES PLUMBIN~ - - 02 00413 16,774.47 15,285.59 15,500.00 24,250.60 156.46% SUPPLIES FLOORING - 02 00414 2,597.52 1,648.56 2,500.00 1,407.96 56.32% -- 02 00415 SUPPLIES ROOFING- 18,021.65 9,281.83 10,000.00 9,392.32 93.92% - ----- - 02 00416 SUPPLIES HARDWARE 31,752.01 39,840.67 35,000.00 35,416.03 101.19% - - - ------ - - 02 00417 SUPPLIES PAINTING 17,835.19 36,829.92 35,000.00 29,500.33 84.29% -- - 02 00418 SUPPLIES PUTTY/GLASS 15,981.27 14,914.92 15,000.00 8,051.14 53.67% --- 02 00420 TEXTBOOKS 112,683.72 81,315.32 111,772.00 78,742.67 70.45% 02 00422 STATE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 303,174.00 0.00 0.00% -- 02 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 54,642.11 60,727.36 67,602.00 55,068.41 81.46% 02 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIO 13,329.39 15,223.89 17,799.00 15,145.17 85.09% 02 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 28,450.32 22,101.33 27,487.00 24,821.85 90.30% 02 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 60.00 184.44 307.40% 02 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 32,745.38 50,676.27 54,500.00 103,585.74 190.07% 02 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIAL 388.00 290.22 4,628.00 350.06 7.56% 02 00491 #* UNDEFINED ACCOUNT*# 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00492 BUILDING MATERIALS 33,871.94 51,228.16 45,000.00 59,226.79 131.62% 02 00496 PARTS/SUPPL, VEHICLE BUS 103,539.98 124,954.17 105,000.00 118,786.1Z_ -113.13% 02 00497 PARTS/SUPPL, EQUIP REPAI 27,227.48 40,050.83 45,800.00 47,966.99 104.73% - 02 00499 AWARDS 7,609.89 5,349.38 7,050.00 5,537.78 78.55% 1-- 02 00521 CARPET 2,184.57 2,556.0~ 365.00 954.59 261.53% -- ~ ---- - -- 02 00523 ROOFING 15,870.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- ----- --- -- - - - - 02 00525 BLINDS 0.00 1, 1 I_8.44 0.00 0.00 --- -- - - - 02 00528 WATER FOUNTAINS 0.00 388.21 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - Page: 18 1l'IH[llt k Y@lR\\'1l'HJHL ,IT'1f11'1LIRl\u0026amp;3 .@CClPOUCJ JIBILHCC Cilfl@@IL n ~ n  ll W4l, I\u0026amp;1vr,1a~IDH1r'UJ!ffi.!J\u0026amp;fi,l'ff (Q)IB3JJfRCC1I' H~'LlJkwil~ '33gg ~ 1:a1n~rn')Y@' nJ \u0026gt;\n@ JPe)' ir~1~ihmil$iQ :l~J0 ) IlDIlNt ~ll'Wficc @ 4} D 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fund Object DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXP/BUD 02 00530 IMPROVE. OTHER THAN BLD 1,282.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00532 FENCE - - - -- -0.00 1,749.00 0.00 -- 0.00 - - 02 00533 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - 383.51 8,529.92 1------7-,6-95 __0_0 --+-----8-,9-27 _1_0 _ -1-16-.0-1_/c__,o - - --- - - ---+--------+--------~-- 02 00540 EqUIPMENT _ _ 484,276.44 170,006.45 124,559.00 123,399.24 99.07% 02 00541 FURNITURE 0.00 . 4,706.62 0.00 0.00 02 00549 BAND iNsfRUMENTS --- 0.00 -~2-9-,1-7-8-.2-4+----1-,5-0-0.-0-0_,_ ___ 5_5_3_-8-8-3 -6-.9-30-/c__,o 02 00550 VEHICLES - ____ 0.00 t-----0-.0-0----2-5,000.00 1-----24-,2-6-4-.0-0 97.06% 02 00551 BUSES - - - 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 00552 * 123,742.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1-----1 02 00553 * ------ 312,997._52_ _____ 0._00-+_-_-__ 0_.0_0-l_-___ 0._0_0_ _ 02 00556 #* UNDEFINED ACCOUNT*# 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00570 IMPROVEMENTS - - - 0.00 0.00 +-----0-.0-0-+-------0-.0-0 1------ 02 00571 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS ,~ __ 1,014.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00575 HVAC EQUIPMENT - 24,481.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00610 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --,----,-,--,-I 04 00610 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 637,259.78 224,285.46 440,155.00 446,840.00 101.52% 04 00620 INTEREST 556,636.89 564,799.49 734,985.00 679,385.20 92.44% 02 00630 DUES AND FEES 12,748.50 16,200.75 20,568.00 15,185.50 73.83% 04 00630 DUES AND FEES 967.94 756.20 1,560.00 4,101.20 262.90% 02 00641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 240,914.36 161,730.68 178,350.00 134,373.00 75.34% 02 00642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,465.20 02 00644 VEHICLE INSURANCE 0.00 64,980.00 65,000.00 101,964.00 156.87% 02 00645 ACCIDENTAL INSURANCE FU,__ __ 3_,4_44_._3_7_-_-+ -- 7,_6_85__.___4_6_ __ 0.00 15,196.00 ___ __, 02 00646 ACCIDENTAL DEATH INS 0.00 1,261.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 00650 LEGAL AGREE/JUDGEMENTS 1,562.32 0.00 1,000.00 69.30 - 6.-93_/c_o 02 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 4,446.12 11,575.-00__,__ __ 0.00 - --0.00% 02 00690 OTHER EXPENSES 157.12 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 02 00692 #* UNDEFINED ACCOUNT*# 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - Page: 19 Fund Object 02 00699 ~ -- 1l'HllM X @lRZ1['fHfLl ,JI1r1rn_,,!,Rrn3,. (Q)(CI0rlClJ lIBILilC~CC C!ID@@IL~ Jl$ 9\u0026gt;Jl \" TI,{!, l~1\\JP'l!$~lDil\"lrl1J!fil.JlaIB~' ir @lIBJJIECC\"lr ll~'HJXn w~g ~~ 1ll~1H)'f ~ @Il D~ @]1)Jce,\nirta1an1r@n~~ D O ITDIIDa~ ITWilCC @41\u0026lt; 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 DESCRIPTION EXPENSES EXPENSES BUDGET EXPENSES EXPENDITURE REFUNDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 (85,368.94 - --- -- GR-AN-D TOTALS -- - 34,904,530.07 33,015,228.07 36,126,357.00 31,928,393.22 Page: 20 % of EXP/BUD 88.38% L_ 1r!Hllltf ~@IRZ1l'JH1LI II'TP1r'JLl,RIBZ,@ CCOlP1Cl1 JlIBJLIICCC JH1@@1L~ Il  n n 4 )l:i,)~P1Mf'TID)H1rllJJRZJl1B$3~l' f1' Fl1J~CC'Trli@~ff(O)IffiJJJRCC1f -~'QJB!}Q)g 'v\u0026amp;1TTtu1J~/ cmrn,~ @ J1))c_t'\nJffillli'U~@~jJ_]])Ib)(l'_Il'W4CC~@,{1,D = J - - - - -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fn et Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses - - Budget Expenses Exp/Bud - - 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 15,056,539.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1000 INS - -00120 - TRUCTION REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 98,466.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - -- 02 1000 INST -R-UCTION 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 257,721.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1000 INS -- - TRUCTION 00131 -ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 68,807.32 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 02 1000 INS_ 02 1000 INS TRUCTION 00140 SUBSTITUTES. NON-CERT ~16,517.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRUCTION 0015() STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 5,679.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1000 IN - -- - ~ 34,328.52 -- STRUCTION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1000 IN STRUCTION - 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 34,482.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 -f- -- 01 1000 IN STRUCTION 00240 INSURANCE 432,480.75  0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1000 IN STRUCTION 00240 INSURANCE 10,113.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - t--- 02 1000 IN STRUCTION 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 6,752.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 6,819.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1000 INS TRUCTION 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 1,605.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1000 INS TRUCTION 00260 WORKERS COMP 10,437.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1000 INS TRUCTION 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 408.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 29,179.69 2,910.60 3,306.00 3,240.00 98.00% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 28,630.26 76,589.40 100,114.00 82,601.21 82.51% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2,214.29 222.66 248.00 247.84 99.94% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 2,190.13 5,673.45 8,600.00 6,293.i! 73.18% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL - 00240 INSURANCE 844.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00241 INSURANCE. NON-CERT -~ 2,320.21 5,631.32 8,200.00 3595.32 68-.24% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 12.20 0.00 0.00 --- 0.00 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00-251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 36.63 129.57 150.00 - 65.80 43.87% 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 8.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1105 PR ESCHOOL 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 7.32 26.21 150.00 - 93.48 62.32% -- Page: 21 --- Fun Fnct - 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 02 1105 01 1110 02 1110 01 1110 02 1110 02 1110 02 1110 01 1110 02 1110 01 1110 02 1110 02 1110 02 1110 1flH[lB~ @IR.z\"WITIDL il1f1J'ILIIBR \\@CCOrfCU JlffiILilCC(C IHI@@lL, n  n On ,{I, I\u0026amp;W:fJEWID)Il'JfUJ)RlIJDE',lf JFUJl~CC'lril@Wff(Q)IIBJJJE,(C1J' -~WID)g fil:!Ilfil:ll~_Ilj O @JP)ll'fil111IlIID~ @ ~ D2 IIDilD11 Il'WilCC@ 41D, -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 Fnct Descr Object Object Description_ - Expenses Expenses Budget PRESCHOOL - 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV - - 118.00 751.00 0.00 PRESCHOOL -- 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 6,066.15 289.41 36,112.00 PRESCHOOL 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 90.46 0.00 0.00 PRESCHOOL 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 242.45 28.00 0.00 -- PRESCHOOL 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRESCHOOL - 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRESCHOOL 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - - ~ PRESCHOOL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 6,346.13 11,204.56 5,624.00 -- - PRESCHOOL 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 500.00 PRESCHOOL - 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS -- 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 PRESCHOOL 00521 CARPET -- 0.00 2,556.05 0.00 PRESCHOOL 00530 IMPROVE OTHER THAN BLDS - 1,282.88 0.00 0.00 -PRESCHOOL 00532 FENCE 0.00 1,749.00 0.00 PRESCHOOL 00533 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 0.00 8,529.92 7,695.00 PRESCHOOL 00540 EQUIPMENT 2,024.38 3,470.84 3,755.00 - PRESCHOOL 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 1,928.00 KINDERGARTEN 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 1,092,499.27 1,155,500.00 KINDERGARTEN 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 81,302.96 85,000.00 KINDERGARTEN 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00231 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYST 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 33,223.03 33,800.00 KINDERGARTEN 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN - 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 1,375.59 1,500.00 KINDERGARTEN 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 KINDERGARTEN 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 675.47 1,000.00 --- Page: 22 - 93-94 % of Expenses Exp/Bud 100.00 -- 179.71 0.50% 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00- 0.00 3,717.27 66.10% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 373.29 0.00 0.00 8,927.10 ~*********\"' 3,400.07 90.55% 0.00 0.00% 886,912.09 76.76% 2,539.50 0.00 66,966.57 78.78% 19-4.26 - 0.00 25,299.44 - 74.85% 210.99 -- 0.00 ---- - 853.00 56.87% ---- -- 0.00 - 1,140.92 **********' - - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud - 02 1110 KINDERGARTEN 00261 WORKERS COMP NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q2r - f- 1110 KINDERGARTEN 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 f- - --- KINDERGARTEN 00331 PUPIL TRANSPOR-T-ATION 1,068.67 1,107.05 1,430.00 798.87 55.87% 02 1110 KINDERGARTEN 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 10,802.74 9,344.43 8,860.00 10,583.92 P\"********* 02 1110 KINDERGARTEN 00540 EQUIPMENT 95.03 0.00 0.00 968.18 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 4,614,691.08 4,881,600.00 4,179,512.12 85.62% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00120 -REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 10,487.04 10,900.00 9,572.30 87.82% 01 1120 -ELEMENTARY 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 165,050.60 165,000.00 181,388.50 P\"*********\" -- - 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 24,887.60 25,000.00 37,801.90 htr*********l 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00140 SUBSTITUTES. NON-CERT 0.00 13,452.40 13,500.00 13,551.90 f.lt*********l 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 354,750.65 365,000.00 328,089.49 89.89% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 1,738.52 2,000.00 1,743.18 87.16% 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 137,571.44 140,000.00 119,505.85 85.36% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00241 INSURANCE. NON-CERT 0.00 830.22 840.00 703.40 83.74% 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 6,098.60 7,100.00 4,145.90 58.39% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 47.77 60.00 14.56 24.27% 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 3,025.74 3,025.00 5,685.59 htr********\" 02 1120 00261 0.00 17.55 25.00 25.31 firr********' ELEMENTARY WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 6,242.50 fit-********' 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 125.00 0.00 2,245.50 - 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 0.00 174.08 0.00 - -- -0--.00 --- 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 3,995.51 6,193.80 6,895.00 _4,442.45 64.43% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 160.00 0.00 825.00 0.00 0.00% --- 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 24.34 380.00 168.00 44.21% 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 47,665.92 51,417.18 67,431.00 61,410.31 91.-07% Page: 23 [ 1l\"JH!l~~ (O)JRZ\"H'JHLl[, ll1l\"1l'lltHJt RlCDXClTf\u0026gt;~U JJIBILHCs3CC CHl((D)(D)lL,~ n @ n  n w~q,i,1Jta, \u0026gt;o\"Qr)l~:tTio)H1r'UJJJRBZYl~W1~'~' 3u51 wcc1111@wt@IB3JJiacc,r JF11JWI.OJ~~g 1fll'allr)1\nc u\u0026gt;1no, \u0026lt;D)I_lJ)Q\")lrta1t1film@~~ DJ ill.)~1~1c ..tSlf'WfiC@Q ~D -=----=--- - - - - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of -Fun Fnct Fnct Descr - Object Object Description Expense~!- Expenses Budget ~penses Exp/Bud -02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00420 TEXTBOOKS 76,919.90 61,220.51 75,459.00 54,968.92 72.85% I- - - --- -- 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00422 STATE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 135,270.00 0.00 0.00% - - -- 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00440 PERIOOICALSISUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 163.20 200.00 0.00 0.00% -- I- -- - 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,358.21 3,699.05 350.00 1,740.15 ti':*********\"' -02 1120 ELEMENTARY 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 168.00 - 38.00 22.62% 02 1121 -ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 104.25 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 -02 --- 1121 -ELEMENTARY MUSIC 0033- 2 TRAVEL EXPENSES 223.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 t-- --- I- 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 330.01 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 876.30 900.00 994.66 f\u0026gt;*********' - - 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00342 POSTAGE - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.04 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 11.36 1,575.46 2,000.00 3,281.75 htr********\" 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00420 TEXTBOOKS 9,758.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 - 1,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1122 LANGUAGE ARTS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 21.57 0.00 0.00 - 02 1123 MATHEMATICS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 \"556.76 0.00 0.00 02 1124 SCIENCE 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 72.22 0.00 0.00 02 1128 READING 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 708.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 1,908,435.80 2,018,000.00 1,900,987.95 94.20% 02 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 57,039.52 59,200.00 50,137.84 84.69% 01 1130 MID::\u0026gt;LE SCHOOL 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 49,256.07 45,000.00 66,864.00 htr********\" 01 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 11,620.50 15,000.00 24,185.00 htr*********\"' 02 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT 0.00 6,945.10 7,000.00 8,338.10 f\u0026gt;*********' -01 ,--1--130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00210 -SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------- 0.00 02 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 146,436.69 150,000.00 149,610.39 99.74% 02 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 4,530.44 5,000.00 4,265.16 85.30% - 01 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 55,946.29 55,000.00 50,277.38 91.41 % 02 11_3,_0_ MIDDLE SCHOOL 00241 INSURANCE. NON-CERT 0.00 4,235.14 4,200.00 _3,17.30 83.75%-- Page: 24 [ - -- Fun Fnct 01 1130 02 1130 02 - 1130 01 -1130 02 1130 02 1130 01 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 f--- 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 - 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 1130 02 - 1130- 02 1131 02 1131 02 1131 Fnct Descr - MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL '1rHllll$~ (0)JRZ'1l'!JHLl ,,JI'1l''1l'ILJ.RlltZ @CCIJFt\u0026gt; l(JJIBJLll~CCCC JHl(Q)@LL.~ J1 ~ n\" n W~9\u0026gt;1)-[J$\\).\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\"\\Jf'l~:wlD)H'Jr'UJIJIBRTlltIt'l ~ llJ~(C'TI'H(Q)~ff@LIBJJJECC'1r IFUJ~ID~g ~ \u0026lt;l1llta1H'19@' nD9 \u0026lt;D\n1_p)ctJ1rffi.1rtn @1m~ ~D 2 IIDn~ lf\"Jficc@,{l,D - -- - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 - Object Object Description Expenses - Expenses - Budget 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION -0--.00 2,539.72 3,000.00 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 125.60 150.00 - 93-94 % of Expenses Exp/Bud 0.00 1,761.33. 58.71% - -- 55.74 37.16% MIDDLE SCHOOL - 00260 WORKERS COMP -- - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 1,288.19 1,300.00 2,482.76 **********\" - - 00261 -- MIDDLE SCHOOL WORKERS COMP NON-CERT 0.00 37.43 50.00 75.31 **********\" - ---- --- MIDDLE SCHOOL 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 552.00 27.60% - - f- ---- - MIDDLE SCHOOL 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- -- - -- MIDDLE SCHOOL 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 1,704.77 3,334.12 125.00 230.17 **********\" - - MIDDLE SCHOOL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 2,396.85 f- 1,676.05 2,700.00 493.49 18.28% MIDDLE SCHOOL  00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 206.46 0.00 0.00 270.95 - --- --- - MIDDLE SCHOOL 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 38.00 0.00 1,000.00 475.00 47.50% MIDDLE SCHOOL 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEl 0.00 345.58 450.00 1,001.37 **********,. c-- - -- -- MIDDLE SCHOOL 00342 POSTAGE 1,231.50 1,281.60 3,675.00 1,731.38 47.11% -- - MIDDLE SCHOOL 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 168.55 631.86 1,400.00 106.80 7.63% -- -- MIDDLE SCHOOL 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00% -- -- MIDDLE SCHOOL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 19,561.85 17,712.52 21,030.00 20,132.14 95.73% C-MIDDLE SCHOOL 00420 TEXTBOOKS 12,266.86 2,980.45 5,462.00 6,206.96 **********\"' MIDllLE SCHOOL 00422 STATE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 56,404.00 0.00 0.00% - MIOOLE SCHOOL 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00% MIDDLE SCHOOL 00497 PARTS/SUPPL, EQUIP REPAIR 288.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00521 CARPET 0.00 0.00 365.00 366.45 **********1'1 ------ MIDDLE SCHOOL 00540 EQUIPMENT 7,389.42 2,534.32 7,700.00 5,709.99 74.16% 00541 0.00 0.00 -- -0.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL FURNITURE 0.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL 00630 DUES AND FEES 45.00 75.00 375.00 0.00 0.00% MUSIC 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 0.00% MUSIC 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 45.00 50.00 3,100.00 995.52 32.11% MUSIC 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 784.69 467.50 2,800.00 _1,473.23 52.-62% Page: 25 -Fun Fnct 02 1131 -- - 02 1131 02 1131 02 1131 02 1131 -02 -1131 - -- 02 1131 02 1132 02 1132 02 1132 02 1132 -02- 1132 - I--- 02 1133 02 1133 02 1134 02 1134 02 1134 02 1134 02 1135 02 1135 02 1135 02 1135 02 1136 -02 1136 02 1137 02 1137 02 1139 02 1139 'Jl'lHl1l 'X1 1, lRtH'HHll .JI1l'\"Jl'JL,lJPJZ1 (D)CCIlP~U JJIBlLIICCr'C !Bl@@lL TI~ '])~_TgI) \"T I~ 0 l~.'1J4l l~)o \"0l\")i!,f1lU1H1l'llYlP2rJnLr{'i~'f J t~llYWCC\"II'JI(D)JNYff(D)J.ffi,fJJE,(C\"Jr lr'UJ!T il\u0026gt;J')o ~ ,ll@llt.' (U l Jl 1~ W11(1r\n) l 1fl'fiim~ (D )~JJ IIDIb)(t~ ITWficcq@ 41,D 91-92 92-93 93-94 Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget - - - - MUSIC 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 40.00 0.00 0.00 MUSIC - 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 - 252.00 300.00 MUSIC - 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 MUSIC 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 119.47 165.21 3,575.00 f.-- MUSIC 00499 AWAROS 0.00 0.00 850.00 f-- MUSIC 00540 EQUIPMENT 200.44 0.00 600.00 f--- -- - -- MUSIC 00630 OUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 740.00 ~ LANGUAGE ARTS - 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 f--- -LANGUAGE ARTS 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 40.74 0.00 0.00 \u0026gt;-- LANG-UAGE ARTS 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 144.00 0.00 0.00 LANGUAGE ARTS 00410 -SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 2,836.69 1,197.49 1,341.00 LANGUAGE ARTS - 00450 AUOIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 34.00 MATHEMATICS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS - 1,793.17 1,534.62 5,875.00 MATHEMATICS 00540 EQUIPMENT - 0.00 64.31 0.00 SCIENCE 00331 -PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 SCIENCE 00410 SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 2,250.94 1,179.76 2,398.00 SCIENCE 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 2,453.30 0.00 SCIENCE 00540 - -EQUIPMENT 331.38 0.00 0.00 SOCIAL STUDIES 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOCIAL STUDIES 00410 SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 1,204.55 716.89 375.00 SOCIAL STUDIES 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 SOCIAL STUDIES 00540 EQUIPMENT 210.89 0.00 1,100.00 I-SPEECH \u0026amp; DRAMA 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 SPEECH \u0026amp; DRAMA 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 21.54 81.61 50.00 ____ _] - - 93-94 % of - Expenses Exp/Bud 0.00 168.00 56.00% 0.00 3,316.23 92.76% 249.25 29.32% 791.25 **********,. 470.00 63.51% 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,139.79 85.00% 0.00 0.00% 11,290.73 **********,. 0.00 0.00 2,303.78 96.07% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 ---- 1,056.22 96.02% 0.00 0.00 0.00% -- - --- ART 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ART 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 863.40 1,707.73 2,580.00 1,363.~ 52.83% PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00410 SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 1,153.68 648.52 820.00 - 387.13 47.21% PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 72.61 0.00 --- 0.00 - Page: 26 1[1JH[l@~ ({DJR{1['JHJL! .ll1r'1rJLJma @ccrt Jp)liJJIBIL,II(CCCJB [@CO)]l. Il W J1n J1W W,11l,~ 1-\"0P'lttk1JD\nll1l'llJJRJ{IlBc1'Wil~l'1 l(J:WCC'ITII@:N'#@IffiJIIB,CC'IT k'lLJ~Jl)g \u0026amp;1n1rui~ cmIn)2 @IP1ir~1ttfiM ~DgIID ceIIDa JNfic.cce@41,D __ ] - -~ - - T - - --- -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr . Object _9bject Description Expenses Expenses _ Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 02 - 1139 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00540 EQUIPMENT 100.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1140 00110 0.00 3,246,173.56 -- HIGH SCHOOL REGULAR CERTIFICATED 3,441,100.00 3,046,616.30 88.54% 02 - - 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 30,450.00 29,846.16 98.02% 1140 - - 02 HIGH SCHOOL ,0_0__1_2 0 -REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,851.24 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 67,420.90 70,000.00 58,819.70 84.03% - 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 23,179.60 __ 20,000.00 9,821.00 49.11% 1140 -- 02 HIGH SCHOOL 00140 SUBSTITUTES. NON-CERT 0.00 1,870.60 2,000.00 2,945.20 **********,I 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 6,014.50 0.00 4,373.50 -'-- 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1140 - -- - 02 HIGH SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 246,234.28 252,330.00 232,906.49 92.30% - - 02 1140 HIGH- SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 579.72 600.00 979.11 **********'JI 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00212 SS TAX. STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 334.57 -- 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 89,963.04 90,000.00 73,680.49 81.87% ,0__2_ 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 860.00 703.50 81.80% 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 703.30 - -- 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 4,320.37 5,040.00 2,784.73 55.25% 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP. NON CERT 0.00 26.53 50.00 12.20 24.40% 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 2,250.81 2,270.00 3,943.90 \"'*********\"\" 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 11.60 10.00 7.99 79.90% 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 2,290.50 76.35% 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 1,330.00 132.00 0.00 0.00 -- - --- 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 226.72 33.51 0.00 2,565.14 -- 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 2,180.10 3,149.28 3,200.00 - 1,400.00 43.75% 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 0.00 11,665.95 7,187.00 1,898.80 26.42% 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 1,351.56 8,943.26 6,273.00 1,171.79 18.68% -- - Page: 27 C - 'Jf!HJJB~ CD)lfil\"If!HlLl II\"If'JfILlB m@ccoc IrllYIB3lLIICCC ClHI@@IL~ Il b!1lIl  n b!l),-0l\u0026amp;, IDf'lB~TI'IrUJmIB IB3'i'fI FUJ~CC'IrII@~#(Q)IIBJlIBCC'Ir lFUJ~jJ)~g_ _ fil1Ilfil1Hil''J7l D_~ @~Jr~~ q@~D2 IIDIb:l(t JNfi\u0026lt;D@,(l,D - -- 91-92-- 92-93 93-94 93-94 Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget ~penses - -02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 9,157.28 2,787.94 9,050.00 3,806.98 -02 --1140 HIGH S-CHOOL 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 1,189.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00335 INOISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 709.72 1,000.00 1,489.54 -02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00340 REPAIRS-TELEPHONE 288.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00342 POSTAGE 5,449.28 5,083.81 6,300.00 8,640.66 - -- -02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00360 PRINTING ANO BINDING 2,204.38 1,123.92 900.00 196.61 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00370 TUITION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00394 f----- SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 0.00 1,385.00 1,800.00 2,945.00 -02 --1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 27,305.46 17,885.79 25,235.00 33,02\"4.64 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00420 TEXTBOOKS 11,312.26 12,619.09 0.00 8,088.15 -- 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00422 STATE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 111,500.00 0.00 f--02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00540 EQUIPMENT 9,824.96 2,011.51 14,250.00 5,062.35 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00541 FURNITURE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 00630 DUES AND FEES 886.00 1,005.00 2,500.00 1,282.00 02 -1141 MUSIC 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 651.40 350.00 300.00 0.00 1-- 02 1141 MUSIC 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 191.70 0.00 0.00 274.25 02 1141 MUSIC 00324 CLEANING SERVICES 1,538.15 145.00 900.00 459.98 02 1141 MUSIC 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 6,956.05 4,663.83 3,200.00 2,024.27 02 1141 MUSIC 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 7,464.31 4,864.61 3,100.00 3,473.32 -02 1141 MUSIC 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 225.75 578.45 600.00 -- 66-5- .62 02 1141 MUSIC 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 02 1141 MUSIC 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEt. 0.00 142.80 200.00 - 0.00 02 1141 MUSIC 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \u0026gt;--- ----- 02 1141 MUSIC 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 12,255.87 13,854.30 6,300.00 8,240.30 -- - --- 02 1141 MUSIC 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 25.32 0.00 0.00 - --- 02 1141 MUSIC 00499 AWARDS 1,921.72 1,189.93 1,000.00 198.08 02 1141 -MUSIC 00521 CARPET 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 28 J % of Exp/Bud 42.07% t,lt-*********,. **********\" 21.85% **********ii **********,. 0.00% 35.53% 51.28% 0.00% 51.11% 63.26% **********11 l'A'*********11 t----- 0.00% ,__ t'A'*********' 19.81% -- [ --~ Fun Fnct f- 02 1141 -- - '1('Hlll~ H@lR{1rJHI JLH'1r''1r'll,l\u0026amp;] R{@(a)l{( lPUJTIBJLII~CCCC llll@@JL, n  n r, n WW,1\\,l~ ~P'lll~1)!1))[1('l(JJR{l\\%~ 183Wlf 1'UJ~ca1rn@Wff@]IBJJIBCC1f n~'UJB:TIgID (\" ~1TT\u0026amp;1H~( ('J JTI\u0026gt;I ~ W)J1W)lrta1rtfi1ID@~ ~4 2 ~ltDtt ~f1ccq @,fl,k - -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget MUSIC 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 268.66 600.00 '--- -\u0026gt;-- - - --- 02 1141 MUSIC 00549 BAND INSTRUMENTS 0.00 29,178.24 _1,500.00 '--- - ~ 02 1141 MUSIC 00630 DUES AND FEES 1,119.00 1,179.00 850.00 ---- 02 1142 LANGUAGE ARTS 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1142 LANGU-AGE ARTS - 00333 - INSERVICE REGISTRATION 72.00 0.00 0.00 02 1142 LANGUAGE ARTS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 800.23 1,154.39 1,250.00 - -- 02 114-3 -MATHEMATICS -00410 -SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,004.40 7,228.82 1,200.00 02 1144 SCIENCE 00331 -PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 118.42 0.00 0.00 02 1144 SCIENCE - 00410 -SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,795.01 2,811.59 2,500.00 02 1144 SCIENCE 00540 EQUIPMENT 287.00 0.00 0.00 02 1145 SOCIAL STUDIES 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 02 1145 SOCIAL STUDIES 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,002.18 917.14 1,200.00 -- 02 1146 SPEECH AND DRAMA 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 500.00 02 1146 SPEECH AND DRAMA 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 193.49 353.19 300.00 00410 ~ 02 1147 ART SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,928.52 2,854.22 1,900.00 - 02 1148 RADIOnY 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 547.24 0.00 02 1148 RADIOnY 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,508.67 1,482.38 0.00 02 1149 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1149 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 626.38 587.40 350.00 02 1149 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 300.00 02 1150 ATHLETICS 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 900.00 922.50 1,000.00 02 1150 ATHLETICS 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 15,100.00 0.00 0.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 95.00 0.00 \u0026gt;- 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 7.27 0.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 6,935.03 8,998.33 8,500.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 10,403.36 9,564.39 10,500.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 24,242.13 24,236.24 26,000.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 00499 AWARDS 3,180.20 2,079.83 2,600.00 Page: 29 - - 93-94 % of Expenses Exp/Bud ~95.21 i\"k*********~ 553.88 36.93% 580.00 68.24% 0.00 0.00 1,036.71 82.94% 863.68 71.97% 0.00 3,045.56 11'r*********\" 0.00 0.00 1,387.56 11'r*********' 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 2,687.48 i\"k*********' 0.00 0.00 0.00 416.10 i\"k*********\" - 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 18,183.60 0.00 -- 0.00 7,325.23 86.18% 5,397.85 51.41% 25,512.16 98.12% 2, 17~.37 83.67% [ - - Fun Fnct -- 02 1151 02 1152 02 - 1152 02 - 1152 02 1152 02 1152 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 02 1153 t--02 1154 02 1160 02 1161 02 1161 02 1161 02 1161 02 1161 02 1162 02 1162 02 1162 -02 1163 01 1191 02 1191 1l'lli1lfh~ ((J)JRZ1rlmlk ll1[\"J['J(\u0026amp;JJRR Z(O)CCJfJU:IJ{J( IBTL.JIC(CC~ Hll@(O)]l,,~ TI TI,.T, I~ Wll 11, l~)~P\"lllfilDJll1rHYlRZJJII:B%'irl ~UJ~(C1fJI(O))t\\Jff(Q)lIB,HTRCC'Il' Lt~'lJ)'~O)g (\u0026lt;) ulllfil'H\"~\" co)J 1/I ~ Q)J D(t',)['Mlrtfiun~ @~D-2i ll)~Ib)(t ~\"ficc@~~ -=- - - --- -- -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 Fnc-t Descr - Object Object Description I Expenses Expenses -- Budget ~penses BOYS ATHLETICS - 00540 EQUIPMENT 0,00 3,544,27 _l_,000.00 1,866.95 GIRLS ATHLETICS - - 003-2- 6 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 -GIRLS ATHLETICS - 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 6,348.43 6,678.40 7,500.00 1,725.75 GIRLS ATHLETICS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS -\u0026gt;- 13,218.89 10,278.58 12,560.00 7,992.29 GIRLS ATHLETICS 004-99 AWARDS 1,902.38 1,568,15 1,900,00 742.86 GIRLS ATHLETICS 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 596.08 2,000.00 0.00 -- COMBINED ATHLETICS 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 62.50 0.00 0,00 - - -- - -- -- COMBINED ATHLETICS 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0,00 4.78 0.00 0.00 -- - COMBINED ATHLETICS - 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 COMBINED ATHLETICS 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0,00 500.00 0.00 - - COMBINED ATHLETICS 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 540.00 540,00 540.00 495.00 ----- --- COMBINED ATHLETICS 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 250.00 192.89 -- COMBINED ATHLETICS 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 107.12 COMBINED ATHLETICS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 187,50 COMBINED ATHLETICS 00645 ACCIDENTAL INSURANCE FUND 3,444.37 7,685.46 0.00 15,196.00 -- GIRLS SOFTBALL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 376.54 STUDENT ACTIVITIES 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,842.85 CHEER 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 1,800.00 820.09 CHEER 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0,00 150.00 62.74 -- CHEER 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 875,00 70.37 CHEER 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 654.20 565.10 825.00 130.00 CHFER 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,827.16 2,399.49 6,300.00 10,703.25 -- DRILL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 184.08 903.17 625.00 0.00 -- DRILL 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 105.00 535.99 275.00 0.00 00410 -- DRILL SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,634.14 436.30 6,215.00 0.00 - PEP CLUB 00331 - PUPIL -T-RANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUMMER SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 SUMMER SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 50,587.50 ~1,260.00 50,520.00 Page: 30 J % of Exp/Bud 62.23% 0.00% 23.01% 63.63% 39.10% 0.00% \u0026gt;- 0.00% 91,67% 77.16% - 45.56% 41.83% 8.04% 15.76% ~*********, 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% - - 38.49% -- L ~ -- 91-92 --- - - 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of -Fun Fnc-t Fnct Descr Obje~ Object Description Expenses Expenses -- Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 01 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00115 CERTIFIEO ADMIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I- - -- 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 0.00 8,153.00 14,160.00 11,745.50 82.95% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 3,445.00 8,210.00 4,566.00 55.62% 1-- - -- 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 5,400.00 0.00 0.00% - ~0-2 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS -- 0.00 540.00 1,200.00 620.00 51.67% 01 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \u0026gt;----- - - 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 4,370.30 14,550.00 4,763.04 32.74% 02 1191 -SUMMER SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX NON-CERTIFIED - 0.00 288.66 1,770.00 349.28 19.73% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00212 SS TAX STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 500.00 47.43 9.49% - i----. -- - 01 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -t- -- 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 46.99 4,080.00 1.50 0.04% 02 1191 SUMM-ER SCHOOL 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP. NON CERT 0.00 9.99 603.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 111.61 1,240.00 0.00 0.00% - -- - - ---- -- 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00261 WORKERS COMP. NON-CERT 0.00 6.55 321.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 1,020.00 1,215.00 8,600.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.35 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00370 TUITION 0.00 19,200.00 11,000.00 8,820.00 80.18% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00385 M\u0026amp;OICUSTODIAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,822.06 1,085.32 21,526.00 2,837.22 13.18% 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 360.07 02 1191 DRIVER EDUCATION 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 725.18 455.00 1,000.00 662.67 66.27% 01 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -~ 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 15,120.00 15,840.00 15,841_.00* *********i 01 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 1,124.93 1,210.00 _1,2~84 **********~ 01 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 12.10 20.00 0.00 0.00% -- - --- Page: 31 ~ 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses -- Budget Expe~ Exp/Bud 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 28.73 10.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 0031 s'\nNTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 4,320.00 -- 1,600.00 1,600.00 1,550.00 96.88% 02 -1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00327 '\nPAIRS/MAINT-BUSNEHICLE 7.91 62.51 720.00 32.95 4.58% -- 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 00410 SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 923.13 197.81 0.00 0.00 02 1193 MINIGRANTS 00310 - PROFESSIONAL\u0026amp;TECHSERV 0.00 0.00 350.00 325.00 92.86% 02 1193 MINI GRANTS 00 341-\nLEPHONE ----+ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----+-------+--------+ 02 1193 MINI GRANTS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,295.86 3,717.25 2,446.00 3,418.72 ~*********' ~ 1193 MINI GRANTS -- 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 655.60 537.08 725.00 0.00 0.00% ~ 1193 MINIGRANTS 00450 AUDIOVISUALMATERIALS 75.21 13.19 0.00 0.00 02 1193 MINI GRANTS 00540 EQUIPMENT 777.32 362.92 1,479.00 572.23 38.69% - 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 19,575.00 47,990.00 19,860.00 41.38% Q2 1194 -:c-T~MER SCHOO\nQ 0 11 5 CERTIFIED ADMIN 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00150 STIPENDS-WOR-K-SH-O-PS---+-------f-----'----+---'-----f-----'-- 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00210 -~AL SECURITY TAX ------+--------+--------'-----+----'------+--------'---- 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 2,250.00 4,600.00 2,300.00 50.00% 0.00 74.00 1,100.00 290.00 26.36% 0.00 1,669.59 3,999.00 1,695.20 42.39% 0.00 5.66 12.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00212-\nTAX. S-TI-PE-ND-S-----i--------+--------+--------+----- 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.18 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 243.00 0.00 0.00% ~ 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 0031 0 PROFES-SIO-N-AL_\u0026amp;_T-EC-H-S--E1_-R--_-V-- -,--:---+------,---+0-.--0--0--- -+- 46.00 0.00 0.00 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0.00 329.13 0.00 - -0- .00 02 1194 ACT/PSAT ~UMMER SCHOOL 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES ------+-----:----:-:---+-----,---,--,-+--------+-- 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 50.00 35.07 70.14% 0.00 0.00 232.00 83.81 36.13% -------+-----cc--=--=--f---,,--,--,--,-t----,-----f-- 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00385 M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES 02 1194 ~/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00410 ~PPLIES AN-D-MA-T-ER-IA-LS---f---.,-----,----=--+--~~---t- 0.00 2,044.00 2,373.00 0.00 0.00% 2,564.76 2,464.99 3,317.00 2,931.08 88.37% - 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 237.13 0.00 0.00 --------+-----,--,--,---+-----,-----,---+---- 02 1194 ACT/PSAT SUMMER SCHOOL 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 973.91 - 945.00 0.00 0.00% ---- -- ._0_1__ .,____1 195- SATURDAYD ETENTION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - Page: 32 1l'IHll@\nY \u0026lt;D)JRZ'JILl'Iil1fl f'1rH,1mm @CC]ltI f\u0026gt;UJLIBlLIIC~C flll@@JL n  n  n W,{l, l\u0026amp;1\"0M@'.~~1D)ll1rlLJlfJllJaW\u0026amp;i'If3l ? UJ~CC'TI'II@Nff@JJlRCC'll' lFUJrnDJ~g_ ~ \u0026amp;.1fl(allr\"' @ n J,9 @n\u0026lt;r~1rfa.1C(fi1m@~~ Dg IIDcelb)cr$ WYUCC~@ ,(!,D - == J 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 02 1195 SATUROAYDETENTION 00110 REGULARCERTIFICATED 0.00 4,160.00 --4~00- 3,442.50 76.50% 02 1195 SATURDAY DETENTION 0012{) REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 607. 50 01 1195 SATURDAYDETE-NT-IO_N_ 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1195 SATURDAYDETENTION 00210 ~OCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 316.07 325.00 263.16 80.97% 02 1195 SATURDAYOE~-OQ211  ~TAX, NONCERTIFIED 0.QQ 0.QQ -- 0.QQ 46.44 1----1----+ -------+-------+- --- ------+------ 01 1195 SATURDAY DETENTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 \u0026gt;-- 02 1195 SATURDAYDETENTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENTCOMPENSATION 0.00 7.87 15.00 4.18 27.87% l---+-- 02 1195 SATURDAYDETENTION 00260 WORKERSCOMP 0.00 2.22 10.00 4.77 47.70% I- ----- 02 1195 SATURDAYDETENTION 00261 WORKERSCOMP,NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 f----+---+-- ,- --- - 02 1195 SATUROAYDETENTION 00310 PROFESSIONAL\u0026amp;TECHSERV 0.00 979.58 1,000.00 0.00 0.00% f-0-2--1-1-195 SATURDAYDETENTION -00410 SUPPLIESANDMATERIALS 14.97 _____ o_ _o__ o-+---- 150.00 - 742.20 ********** 01 1210 IT_IN_ERA_NT_INSTRUCTION0 011 0 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0. ocr- -7---2,-3--,2 ----7--,+--1---7. -6_,_3__00__0 0 -+---6-6-,5 -19.6 2 87. 18 lo 01 1210 ITINERANTINSTRUCTION 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1----+---+- 02 1210 ITIN_ERA_N_TINSTRUCTION 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 5,341.07 5,500.00 4,847.98 88.15% 1--,------1--=---=--+ 01 1210 ITINERANTINSTRUCTION 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 1,783.80 1,700.00 1,406.60 82.74% 01 1210 ITINERANTINSTRUCTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENTCOMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1----+---\n- ,__0_2 _,_1_2_1_0--+-1T_INERANINT STRUCTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENTC OMPENSATION 0.00 117.10 150.00 60.91 40.61 % 02 1210 ITINERANTINSTRUCTION 00260 WORKERSCOMP 0.00 39.00 50.00 83.55 **********' 1----t----+- -----+-------l--------+------~1---------1- 02 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 2,164.67 0.00 0.00 1----+------t 02 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION 00335 INDISTRICTTRAVEL 0. 00 289. 04 21000. 00 0.00 24.45 1.22% l----+---t- 01 1220 RESOURCEROOM 00110 REGULARCERTIFICATED 0.00 1,132,640.52 1,198,000.00 1,259,807.871**********' ------11----f- - 01 1220 RESOURCEROOM 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I---+----+ --+-------\u0026lt; 02 1220 RESOURCEROOM 00210 SOCIALSECURITYTAX 0.00 83,872.79 84,500.00 93,258.211**********' 1----+---t- ------+----------1---=---,-\"==-:::---:-::--l---=-=--=-=c-::---=-=--+----=--,:-'-,=-~,--:--f----,--,-----,----,----,I 01 1220 RESOURCEROOM 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 31,759.42 32,000.00 33,753.911**********' 01 1220 RESOURCE ROOM OQ25Q:NEMPLOYMENTCOMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 - - 1----+---+- ,__0_2__+2-12 ._R..E0 S_OU RCE ROOM 00250 UNEMPLOYMENTC OMPENSATION 0.00 1,444.11 ___ 1,7 00.00 1,136.99 66.88% ,__0_2_-+--1_2_2_0-+RESOURCE_R_OO_M_ 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 716.69 800.00 -1,572.40 !\u0026lt;-*********' 02 1220 RESOURCEROOM 00310 PROFESSIONAL\u0026amp;TECHSERV 0.00 0.00 270.00 0.00 0.00% Page: 33 -- - - -- - - -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fn ct Descr - Object Object Description- Exp-e-n- ses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 02 1220 RES OURCE ROOM 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00% -- - 02 1220 RES OURCE ROOM 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- --t-- - 02 1220 RES OURCE ROOM 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1220 RES OURCE ROOM 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,649.09 2,175.54 3,180.00 2,440.09 76.73% 02 1230 SPE CIAL CLASS 115 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 7,836.25 5,391.51 0.00 0.00 02 1230 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 15 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 599.90 412.76 0.00 0.00 02 1230 SPE CIAL CLASS 115 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 82.77 23.78 0.00 0.00 --- 02 1230 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 15 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 6.67 4.12 0.00 0.00 01 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 640,302.24 676,900.00 434,763.94 64.23% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 12,122.73 **********\" 01 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 46,866.20 47,000.00 32,197.26 68.50% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 950.00 927.70 97.65% 01 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 18,746.86 18,400.00 12,583.04 68.39% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 500.00 1,054.95 **********\"' 01 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 815.20 1,000.00 396.59 39.66% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 25.00 10.77 43.08% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 399.54 400.00 505.35 l,ti,*********11 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 25.00 3.90 15.60% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 136.29 161.27 510.00 95.29 18.68% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 569.70 751.40 1,420.00 1,006.01 70.85% 02 1240 SPE CIAL CLASS 1 10 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 83.87 0.00 0.00 01 1250 SPE CIAL CLASS, 1 6 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 183,255.96 235,900.00 145,795.82 61.80% 02 1250 SPE CIAL CLASS. 1 6 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 12,910.56 60,000.00 11,809.81 19.68% 01 1250 SPEC IAL CLASS, 1 6 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 02 1250 SPE CIAL CLASS, 1 6 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 13,725.38 14,000.00 11,010.68 78.65% 02 1250 SPE CIAL CLASS, 1 6 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 987.56 4,700.00 903.44 19.22% -- Page: 34 C 'lfl1Hl' ~@lRZ'TrlHlLI JI'lf'Jl'lLJflR. ZCDXCTOflCU JIBIL,Il~((CC JHl(O)@lL1~ n  n\" n~ ~9),{\\, )''1TIPJ ~~OJ)['J['llJJRZJ~If~il 'yf JFUJWCC'JI'Il@W#CO)J~Jfl\u0026amp;CC'lr Jt?UJ:f'illl)g (ufil!Dfillli'c~l\") )nI1 ~ i_O\n)(.t'\n)f~1trfi~ ~]~ ID)IlDtr ~fi~ct@,-O,D - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud -- - 01 1250 SPECIAL CLASS 1 6 00240 INSURANCE - 0.00 - 4,829.86 5,800.00 3,596.92 62.02% 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 - 00241 INSURANCE NON-CERT 0.00 463.34 2,500.00 380.20 15.21 % 01 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - -- 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 231.86 275.00 128.95 46.89% 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP. NON CERT 0.00 19.42 90.00 10.79 11.99% - ~ 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 6 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 113.57 125.00 178.11 **********, - 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00261 ~RKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 2.76 90.00 14.77 16.41% 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 - 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS 1 6 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 6 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 151.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00410 SUPPLIES ANO MATERIALS 2,753.27 32.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 6 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 236.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 6 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS 388.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS. 1 6 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,529.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 6 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1260 PRIVATE DAY SCHOOL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 2,212.20 0.00 0.00 02 1271 ACT 591 HANDICAPPED, RES 00370 TUITION 10,024.76 8,629.20 10,000.00 11,066.61 **********' 02 1272 ACT 591 NON-HANDICAPPED 00370 TUITION 18,486.72 17,571.13 15,000.00 30,291.27 fir******** 01 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 126,626.49 133,900.00 111,036.62 82.93% 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00% 01 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 9,188.60 9,300.00 8,110.55 87.21% 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 230.00 ---- 0.00 0.00% 01 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 4,087.23 4,200.00 3,44-6.25 82.05% 01 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---0.00 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 161.21 200.00 99.94 49.97% 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00% - -- Page: 35 C 91-92 -- --- 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud I- -f-- - 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 79.29 100.00 142.50 **********' f-- - f-- - I- - ,_0 2_ 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00% I- - 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I- -- 02 1280 -PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 15.00 350.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 137.97 150.00 190.08 **********'1- 02 -- 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 140.00 150.00 185.00 **********1- -- 02 1280 -PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 564.37 600.00 694.71 **********i - 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 2,289.23 2,456.00 1,434.78 58.42% ~ 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \u0026gt;---- 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 23.73 0.00 0.00 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS 0.00 290.22 425.00 350.06 82.37% 02 1280 00540 0.00 0.00 269.00 270.62 **********,, PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL EQUIPMENT 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00% 1-- 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PRO 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 11,400.00 11,122.00 97.56% 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PRO 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 900.00 851.48 94.61% \u0026gt;- 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PRO 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 100.00 7.75 7.75% 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PRO 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 25.00 11.10 44.40% 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDIC 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 56,683.92 98,512.08 150,000.00 133,382.62 88.92% 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDIC 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 4,219.15 7,292.73 11,475.00 10,011.57 87.25% 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDIC 00240 INSURANCE 1,608.00 2,732.94 5,142.00 3,242.64 63.06% -- - 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDIC 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 24.40 124.75 210.00 104.35 49.69% ---- 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDIC 00260 WORKERS COMP 16.80 48.77 105.00 114.43 **********1 01 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 78,562.32 83,000.00 77,597.76 93.49% f- 01 1320 -DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 - --- 0.00 02 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 5,788.66 6,000.00 ,7~8.04 95.80% 01 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 1,962.37 2,000.00 1,547.48 77.37% --- 01 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 00250 -~U NEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Page: 36 Fun 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 01 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 ,rnma ~(D)JR\\'ll'HIlLl H'lr'll'll,.,lJ~R {(D)(CIjf~l UJlffi!LIIC(CCJ H((Q)(D')JL n TI,,T I .ef~l~ i~')' k~O)Jl'JrlUJR1l\u0026amp; JB3JY]t'? llJ~CC'lfll(D)~#(Q)lffiJJJECC'lr _ 1GlL[WJID~g-~ fil1TI\u0026amp;md\u0026gt;' @n vQ W)lJl)lrtB.1frfi~~. 1@~I_m\u0026gt;~~IlD11~'w 'ficc@4liD_ Fnct Fnct Descr 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION Object 0 00250 u 00260 w 00326 R 00334 C 00335 IN 00341 T 00410 s 00430 L 00440 P bject Description NEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ORKERS COMP EPAIRS/MAINT-EOUIP AR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY DISTRICT TRAVEL - ELEPHONE - UPPLIES ANO MATERIALS IBRARY BOOKS ERIOOICALSISUBSCRIPTIONS --- ---- 00450 A UOIOVISUAL MATERIALS 00540 EO UIPMENT 00110 R EGULAR CERTIFICATED - --+--------t-- 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1330 BUSINESS EOUCA TION 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 1350 TRADE ANO INDUSTRIAL 00210 s OCIAL SECURITY ,AX 00210 s 00240 I 00250 u OCIAL SECURITY TAX NSURANCE - NEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 00250 uN EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 00260 WO 00326 R RKERS COMP --- EPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 00334 C AR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 00335 IN DISTRICT TRAVEL 00341 T ELEPHONE 00410 s 00430 L 00440 P UPPLIES ANO MATERIALS IBRARY BOOKS ERIOOICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 00450 A UOIOVISUAL MATERIALS 00540 E 00110 R OUIPMENT EGULAR CERTIFICATED - 91-92 92-93 Expenses Expenses 0.00 .... 104.75 0.00 61.43 0.00 0.00 --- f---- 990.00 990.00 0.00 259.33 0.00 0.00 1-- 545.93 607.49 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 156.66 0.00 0.00 2,711.17 -\u0026gt;-- 2,764.81 0.00 356,120.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,192.32 0.00 9,884.72 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 476.71 0.00 280.92 6,850.99 3,642.76 495.00 495.00 0.00 450.46 0.00 0.00 19,594.50 22,171.87 435.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.36 414.78 21,491.60 14,102.63 0.00 252,779.19 Page: 37 - --- 93-94 93-94 Budget Expens~s --- 125.00 64.82 - 75.00 --- 8-9-.50 200.00 0.00 -- - ---- -- 990.00 900.00 0.00 --- 0.00 324.00 0.00 - 1,960.00 425.75 0.00 0.00 ----- 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,150.00 2,405.71 376,500.00 351,132.76 0.00 0.00 26,600.00 26,110.51 9,800.00 8,509.93 0.00 0.00 600.00 290.88 300.00 403.13 - 3,800.00 2,237.66 . 495.00 450.00 -- 0.00 -- 450.45 324.00 0.00 --- 13,462.00 17,456.10 0.00 0.00 - - --- 50.00 0.00 500.00 ---- 52.70 __J_Q,450. 00 15,548.51 267,400.00 2~2.16_1.22 J % of Exp/Bud -- 51.86% i\n-*********\" 0.00% 90.91% 0.00% 21.72% 0.00% **********' 93.26% 98.16% 86.84% 48.48% l,Tr*********' 58.89% 90.91% 0.00% **********\"' --- 0.00% 10.54% **********\"' 94-.30% ~ -- Fun Fnct 02 1350 01 1350 02 \u0026gt;----- - 1350 I--- - 01 1350 ~- 02 1350 of 1350 02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 -- - -02 1350 02 1350 - 02 1350 -02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 02 1350 01 1352 01 1352 02 1352 01 1352 01 1352 02 1352 02 1352 02 1352 02 1352 1l'Hlll' \\(.()1JP-Z1lLl'J,TllT! 1l'1l'IL,]JRa{ @(Cl~I rllJIB3IL,IICCC CTill@@JL, n w n,, n ~P)~rq~J 1:t\u0026gt;i\u0026lt;IP'Jl:h:t11D)H1t'HYrnJRnZrJJ R::l\\il~J~~c c1rH@~1@mJJracc1r ~'LlJfTIIJJ~g L~ ,1:ltaF)' q((J)TTI~ \u0026lt;D)]1J)r~,irfu1rtfilm~ ~W\u0026gt;~@ IID~~ !!fl~~@/41,D - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 Fnct Descr - Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses - -- --~ TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,449.18 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL - 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 18,822.36 19,000.00 19,641.10 f- TRADE AND INDUSTRIA-L 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 7,124.19 7,100.00 6,235.14 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.96 - - - TRADE AND INDUSTRIA-L 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COM-P-ENSATION - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TRADE AND INDUS-TRIAL 00250 -UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION -- 0.00 339.15 400.00 216.43 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 203.02 200.00 292.98 - ----- - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I- - - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 92.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 3,064.05 1,417.22 1,800.00 1,344.88 -- TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -f- TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00341 TELEPHONE --- 0.00 0.00 1,620.00 0.00 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 18,396.23 12,922.43 15,157.00 15,075.31 - TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 194.90 0.00 0.00 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 14.77 0.00 0.00 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 603.49 0.00 200.00 0.00 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 00540 EQUIPMENT 7,902.61 43,415.40 16,312.00 16,582.28 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 61,563.60 65,100.00 60,865.80 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 4,513.46 4,600.00 4,509.~ PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 1,574.34 1,600.00 - 1,161.27 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 82.06 100.00 50.82 -- PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 48.08 100.00 70.19 ~ -- - PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 -- --- PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLO 00342 POSTAGE 10.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - Page: 38 J % of Exp/Bud r,tr*********' 87.82% 54.11% r,tr*********' 74.72% 0.00% 99.46% 0.00% **********., 93.50% 98.04% 72.58% 50.82% 70.19% 0.00% -- [ --- -- Fun Fnct 02 - 1-3-52 02 1352 02 1352 -02 1352 ,0--2- 1352 02 1354 ~ 02 1354 02 1354 02 1354 02 1354 02 1354 o-r--1360 01 1360 02 1360 01 1360 01 1360 \u0026gt;-- 02 1360 02 1360 02 1360 02 1360 02 1360 '-- - 02 1360 02 1360 ~ 1360 02 1360 02 1360 02 1360 -01 - - 1370 1r'JU1JMl$@ JR.{1CH1LHJ I1r'1l'lLJlaR {@CCOJCf'U JIIBILllCCC CHll@@lL n  n  n W\"l1,) %.\u0026gt;Xlf)8',~DJJl1['UHJt\u0026amp;JR3 'l'f JFUJ~CC'ITII@~ff(\\J)JIBJJIBCC'IT JFllJ~D)g ~~Ea1n~ur)\n'1@ n 1,?@ wxe\n)ffil1rtfi@~ ~D9I D)Ib)u: in1ficc1@/41J) Fnct De scr Obje__gO_b j ect Description OF TECHNOLO 00410 SUPP OF TECHNOLO 00430 LIBRA OF TECHNOLO 00440 PERI OF TECHNOLO 0 04 5 0 AUOI PRINCIPLES LIES ANO MATERIALS - PRINCIPLES RY BOOKS PRINCIPLES ODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS PRINCIPLES OVISUAL MATERIALS PRINCIPLE S OF TECHNOLO 00540 EQUI PMENT TELEVISION PRODUCTION 00326 REPA N PROOUCTION 00342 POST N PROOUCTION 00410 SUPP N PRODUCTION 00440 PERI N PROOUCTION 00450 AUDI N PRODUCTION 00540 EQU IRS/MAINT-EQUIP TELEVISIO TELEVISIO TELEVISIO TELEVISIO TELEVISIO HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOMEEC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC - HOMEEC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC HOME EC CAREER 0 AGE LIES AND MATERIALS OOICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS OVISUAL MATERIALS IPMENT 00110 REGU 00210 soc 00210 SOCI LAR CERTIFICATEO IAL SECURITY TAX -- AL SECURITY TAX --+- -- 00240 INSU RANCE 00250 UNEM 00250 UNEM 00260 WOR PLOYMENT COMPENSATION PLOYMENT COMPENSATION KERS COMP 00326 REPA IRS/MAINT-EQUIP 00331 PUPI L TRANSPORTATION 00334 CAR 00341 TELE ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY PHONE 00410 SUPP LIES AND MATERIALS RY BOOKS OOICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 00430 LIBRA 00440 PERI 00450 AUDI 00540 EQUI OVISUAL MATERIALS PMENT ---+- RIENTATION 00110 REGU LAR CERTIFICATEO -- 91-92 Expenses 2,361.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 30,963.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,104.23 0.00 200.00 0.00 8,750.09 0.00 89.25 1,383.86 946.82 0.00 Page: 39 -- - - 92-93 93-94 93-94 Expenses - Budget Expenses 2,700.56 __ 1,200.00 947.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- --- 104.40 0.00 0.00 -- --- 26,485.15 200.00 0.00 --- -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- 13,957.82 0.00 0.00 278,0~6.20 294,100.00 250,197.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,360.89 20,800.00 18,316.56 8,032.83 7,800.00 6,090.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 369.00 450.00 211.35 213.06 250.00 304.76 1,964.25 2,500.00 1,523.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 200.00 425.00 -- -- 0.00 324.00 0.00 8,705.74 9,274.00 8,720.97 134.90 0.00 0.00 ----- 109.98 250.00 56.00 -- - 400.03 900.00 769.05 ------ 1,937.20 8,550.00 7,425.68 47,372.64 _50,100.00 48,398.68 J % of Exp/Bud 78.96% - - -- 0.-00% 85.07% 88.06% 78.08% 46.97% **********i 60.93% **********i 0.00% 94.04% 22.40% 85.45% 86.85% 96.60% [ -------- -- 'ITJHIIR~ @]R{'IrlliJ lLII'1r'1rlLIEm @ccoc If\u0026gt;llJIIBJLII(CC CIHI@@IL, n  Il C, n 41, fR~IR~Jl'JI'UJ!R{lE, IIBlY' IF'llJ~CC'JI'II@~#@JB3JJIRCC'JI' ~fil1)lta11~D@,r ll ~@ .[P)ll'ffl.ltrfiI~IDC~ID ~N] ])ceilDa ll'Wficcceq@\u0026lt;{l,_D= J - - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 01 ~ - -- - 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATIO-N 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX --- -- 0.00 3,583.26 3,650.00 __ 3,515.00 96.30% 01 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 1,076.56 1,200.00 1,096.70 91.39% 01 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION - 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 62.90 100.00 40.76 40.76% 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 36.70 50.00 57.91 plr*********\" 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,716.69 662.47 1,400.00 _1,653.77 ri'r********11 - - 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 004-30 LIBRARY BOOKS 104.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 110.83 110.83 150.00 251.62 plr*********' 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 656.46 267.38 550.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 4,507.79 700.00 396.68 56.67% 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 1,050.00 896.52 85.38% -- 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00% - - 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 3,800.00 3,650.25 96.06% 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 353,914.23 374,200.00 316,202.92 84.50% 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 2,760.00 8,500.00 5,112.93 60.15% -- 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 6,731.59 15,000.00 ~.633.19 f,rt-*********\" 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY\"TAX 0.00 26,600.78 27,180.00 ~.177.95 88.95% 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATIO~ 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 515.03 1,300.00 _1,73!-~~ l,Tt-********11 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 9,191.39 __ 9,000.00 6,621.45 73.57% 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00241 INSURANCE. NON-CERT 0.00 214.03 900.00 -8-43.96 93.-77% 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 453.36 560.00 266.93 47.67% -- - - Page: 40 - -Fun 02 - 02 t--02 02 0-2 02 02 02 - 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Fnct 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 I- - 1390 --- 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1390 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1520 1520 1520 1520 1520 1rrno~ l:'-1@lRZ1l'1HLl[t H1l'1rJL,lJRl1\u0026lt;,. CDXClflU~J JIBIL,Il(~G(C llll(Q)(Q)JL,\u0026amp;33 n TI O TT ~,\u0026lt;fl,l ~1~~l~~D)H1rUJlRZlft~J .IBW]l'? UJWC.C1rII@Wff(Q)LffiJJIBCC11\" h'UJWIDg) L~o .tlu1lH )\n~ (0) J11~ ,( 0)]1Jxe,)ft'a\\rtlhm~ @ ~ D~ _]])lfi~r ~ficcceq_~D -- -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses -- Budget SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP NON CERT 0.00 47.47 20.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00260 - WORKERS COMP 0.00 287.82 310.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00261 WORKERS COMP NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 20.00 ---- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 3,875.00 1,000.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 167.20 196.68 900.00 \u0026gt;--- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00331 -PUPIL TRANSPORTATION - 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 526.53 0.00 0.00 - - -- -- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 2,475.00 2,475.00 1,980.00 -- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00335 -INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 228.23 500.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 648.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 0.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00410- SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 8,104.82 9,166.28 __ 7,883.00 00430- - SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 100.64 200.00 t----- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 75.60 0.00 0.00 -- SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 472.27 0.00 1,000.00 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,519.02 17,605.73 7,480.00 BASIC SKILLS 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 600.00 BASIC SKILLS 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 500.00 BASIC SKILLS 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 BASIC SKILLS 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 BASIC SKILLS 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 500.00 BASIC SKILLS 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 2,660.00 BASIC SKILLS 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 430.00 DROPOUT PREVENTION 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 11,593.20 11,732.78 12,500.00 - DROPOUT PREVENTION 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 886.75 897.54 950.00 ---- 93-94 Expenses 17.56 387.53 -- 19.83 0.00 - 115.00 0.00 0.00 1,350.00 557.15 0.00 0.00 4,353.14 244.57 0.00 0.00 4,853.74 54.07 0.00 242.25 35.69 37.50 856.53 0.00 10,71 ~J_!!_ 819.37 -- DROPOUT PREVENTION 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- DROPOUT PREVENTION 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 11.71 25.00 9.77 DROPOUT PREVENTION 00260 WORKERS COMP 3.27 7.22 25.00 13.44 -- --- Page: L+l % of Exp/Bud 87.80% ~*********., 99.15% 0.00% 12.78% 0.00% 68.18% r\"***..,..*****., I- 0.00% 55.22% ~*********., 0.00% 64.89% 9.01% 0.00% 3.57% 7.50% 32.20% 0.00% 85.71% 86.25% 39.08% 53.76% [_ - - -Fun- - Fnct \u0026gt;0-2- 1520 t--- 02 1520 t--- 02 1520 \u0026gt;----- 02 1522 02 ~ 02 1522 02 1522 02 - -- 1522 02 1522 11'lH1JB'.,@, JRZ1l'HlHL il1\" l1'JLI!$lP l@CC~J Pl iJlB311llCC(C JH!@(O)Jl, n~ 9\u0026gt;nW n~ wf \\, lli\\~P'H.%~110)Jl1[\"UJ)RlIBZWJ~ JF UJJNYCC'ITll@W#@Il]JlfaCC'IT lFU!f:~m)g \"2l\u0026amp;.1TTf.11Hc'~'m I1?n ( (})liJ)C\u0026gt;-~H'6i111'f@i1m~~ lID~ Il~ @J.FJ'TICCtl@,{_l, n - -- - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget ~enses r- - - - DROPOUT PREVENTIO-N 0033--1 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 3,244.58 6,321.91 5,604.00 -- 0.00 DROPOUT PREVENTION - 0033- 2 TRAVEL EXPENSES 149.20 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 DROPOUT PREVENTION 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,114.62 960.65 1,500.00 759.55 f-- - -- ------ TRANSITION PROGRAM 0011-0 -REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 7,920.00 7,712.:QQ_ TRANSITION PROGR-AM 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 7,524.00 0.00 0.00 TRANSITION PROGRAM 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 580.00 589.81 -- -- TRANSITION PROGRAM 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 575.63 0.00 0.00 -- TRANSITION PROGRA-M 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 1,872.40 1,400.00 0.00 ---\u0026gt;- TRANSITION PROGRAM - 004-1-0 SUPPLIES AND MATERIAL--S 0.00 1,643.20 2,850.00 1,940.73 02 1522 TRANSITION PROGRAM 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 183.14 900.00 0.00 ~ - 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 24,596.16 25,390.08 33,500.00 20,908.06 02 -f-- 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00120 -REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 89,037.56 101,334.48 72,000.00 86,234.01 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 02 - - - 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER - 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00156 STIPENDS-OTHER NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,881.60 1,942.31 3,033.00 1,587.22 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 6,811.41 7,329.94 5,550.00 6,463.20 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00212 SS TAX. STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 68.00 0.00 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.47 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00231 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYST 0.00 361.94 400.00 78.18 -- 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00240 INSURANCE 677.36 475.00 850.00 - 843.96 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 6,387.92 7,612.23 3,540.00 6,131.29 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 12.20 31.97 45.00 22.78 00251 - -- 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 94.69 175.08 100.00 77.53 - 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00260 WORKERS COMP 6.11 16.11 45.00 23.91 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL- 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 22.76 68.25 100.00 113.60 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 43,368.57 61,395.24 56,100.00 _89,356.00 J % of Exp/Bud 0.00% 50.64% 97.35% **********,I - 0.00% 68.10% 0.00% 62.41 % **********,! 0.00% 52.33% **********\" 0.00% 19.55% 99.29% hrt-********,i 50.62% 77.53% 53.13% 11r*********, l1r*********1 Fun 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Fnct 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1525 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1550 1l'lllllE ~@m1t'JH[ lL,J1'rr1l'lL.JlR~ Z@CCJJtf 1IJlB31LllC~C CHll@@JL-,~ n( 9)n  n ,11,) l?.1\"\u0026lt;:iP'l~~IT\u0026gt;Jl1r'llJlRrnZn)r~ U1 llJ~CC'1ril@BJ#@TB~JlTRCC'1r IF\\,Q'f::Jll))g (~ ulTTfilll[)r ~ @n 1~, (i)J[P)(f)lffillftfilffi\nS~ @~ D9I JD~IID~~lN 'ficgq@ 41D, = - Fnct Descr Object Ob ject Description ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00326 REPA IRS/MAINT-EQUIP ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00331 PUPI L TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00332 TRAV EL EXPENSES ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00333 INSE RVICE REGISTRATION ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY - ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00335 INOIS TRICT TRAVEL ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00342 POST AGE ---+ - ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00380 FOO D SERVICES ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00410 SUPP LIES ANO MATERIALS -- ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00420 TEXT BOOKS -- ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00430 LIBRA RY BOOKS -- ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00440 PERI OOICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00540 EOU IPMENT ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 00541 FURN ITURE ---+ EARLY CHILOHOOD EDUC 00110 REG EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC -- - EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC ULAR CERTIFICATED 00120 REG ULAR NON-CERTIFICATED -- 00125 NON -CERTIFIED AOMIN 00150 STIP ENDS-WORKSHOPS 00151 STIPE NOS NON-CERTIFIED 00210 SOCI AL SECURITY TAX 00211 SSTAX . NON-CERTIFIED 00212 SSTAX STIPENDS 00221 TEAC H RETIRE. NON CERT 00241 INSU RANCE. NON-CERT 00251 UNEM PLOY COMP, NON CERT 91-92 Expenses 514.84 230.81 67.20 100.00 -- 0.00 - ---- 0.00 - - 0.00 - 0.00 12,211.35 0.00 86.87 I- 270.64 I- 5,145.76 0.00 -- \u0026gt;- 0.00 ~ 42,894.15 15,257.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,448.56 0.00 0.00 3,094.08 111.87 - -- - - - 92-93 93-94 93-94 - Expense~ Budget Expenses -----\u0026lt;-- -- - 986.43 1,000.00 295.82 229.95 3,000.00 495.48 -- 0.00 3,460.00 0.00 20.00 100.00 1,650.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 -- 67.20 0.00 151.20 - 0.00 0.00 -- 29.00 315.35 0.00 0.00 -- 6,096.78 ~.800.00 11,919.28 4,495.27 5,500.00 8,914.19 0.00 2,500.00 2,957.54 0.00 250.00 339.00 -- 2,420.33 14,000.00 6,540.09 2,810.25 0.00 0.00 399.00 300.00 300.00 75,861.61 62,896.00 62,707.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 30.50 25.00 22.95 5,433.70 5,826.00 4,547.J_Q 0.00 0.00 - 4.59 0.00 2,105.00 0.00 3,037.00 2,950.00 1,096.60 145.08 145.00 49.81 ---l--------+- -- 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00261 WOR KERS COMP, NON-CERT 21.31 39.05 145.00 73.96 - --- 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00310 PROF ESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 550.00 1,450.00 8,425.00 ___1,086.40 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00331 PUPI L TRANSPORTATION 56.67 972.53 1,300.00 127.47 - - J % of Exp/Bud 29.58% 16.52% 0.00% f,rt-*********~ -- 70.95% f,rt-*********l lit*********' f,rt-*********' 46.71% -- ri\"*********' 99.70% 91.80% 78.05% -- 0.00% 37.17% 34.35% - 51.01 % 48.50% 9.81% -- - -- T -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr -- Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 970.08 911.94 1,000.00 1,078.01 r,\\\"*********' - - f- 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 475.00 255.00 500.00 170.50 34.10% f--- -- 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 398.48 330.00 440.00 2,801.06 ~*********' f-- --- ~ 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 1,007.37 500.00 350.00 70.00% -02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00342 POSTAGE - 13.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING - 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 36.55 200.00 191.68 95.84% f- -t- -02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES -- 0.00 0.00 -- -0.00 0.00 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 25,415.61 34,866.57 21,325.00 14,808.97 69.44% 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00411 I- 1-- SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 1,834.28 91.71 % 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 0.00% -02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00540 EQUIPMENT 2,592.37 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 122.75 0.00 0.00 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 5,072.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1560 READING 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 58,500.00 49,306.96 84.29% - 02 1560 READING 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 4,500.00 3,675.06 81.67% 02 1560 READING 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 1,700.00 1,406.43 82.73% 02 1560 READING 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 50.00 28.86 57.72% 02 1560 READING 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 50.00 22.93 45.86% 02 1560 READING 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 241.89 02 1560 READING 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 3,837.51 95.94% 02 1565  00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 2,650.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1565  00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 202.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- 02 1565  00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 318.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 -- -- 1575  00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 4,417.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- ---- 02 1575  00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 337.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1575  00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 530.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Page: 44 L 1r'JH[ll1H, @JRtll nrrIL JI'TI'1C'lL..lJJR \"{_@(CjT~M 1JJB3ILI1\u0026lt;C(C Jlll(O)@)L, n w~ n LnJ ~,wI\\ . 1~1\"(JfJf1ixmQ)H1CUJ1IRmZwJ J~t? UJWCC'TI'II@:N'#@I:IBJrIBccir JFtp':RTIQg) ~rnn~ur)(r( (Q)Jl~ @n J)(t'\n)f~\\lllll!il~ (((Q)Jil).LlD)Il11 NllC.C~@~ JI 93-94 % of - 91-92 - - 92-93 93-94 Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget Expenses Exp/Bud 02 1590 ~THERCOMPEO -00120 REGULARNON-CERTIFICATEO 93,441.84 - 95,820.14 1O0,000.0Q- 82,838.70 82.84% 02 1590 OTHERCOMPEO 00211 SSTAX. NON-CERTIFIEO 7,147.36 _ 7,329.56 __ 8~1_O_O_O_.o_o_ 6,337.23 79.22% Q2 1590 OTHER COMPED 00241- INSURANCE NON-CERT 9,156.65 5,665.85 12,000.00 4,134.51 34.45% --- --- 02 1590 OTHERCOMPED 00251 UNEMPLOYCOMP NONCERT 150.88 199.62 200.00 74.82 37.41% - ------ ---- -------i 02 1590 OTHERCOMPED 00261 WORKERSCOMP,NON-CERT 23.15 61.33 100.00 107.94 **********' 02 159{) OTHERCOMPED-_ 00310 PROFESSIONAL\u0026amp;TECHSERV _ 60,045_35- __ 3_8_,0___03___ 32- +----3,040.00 __ 260.00 8.55% 02 1590 OTHERCOMPED __ 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP __ 0.00 ____ 0_.0_0_-+_ 3,000.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1590 OTHER COMPED 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 42.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1590 OTHERCOMPED 00335 INDISTRICTTRA-VE_L_ -- --- 0.00 361.28 ----30_0 __0__ 0_ -- -0-.0-0-+--0-.-0-0_/c__,o t-0-2-1--15_9_0_,0THERCOMPED - 00390- OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES - 0.00 0.00 52,480.00 +-----2-1-,-5-5-2.684 1.07% t-0-2-+--159Q~THERCOMPED - 0041{) ~UPPLIESANDMATERIALS 218,223.68 4,863.32 8,000.00 6,944.73 86.81% 02 1590 OTHER COMPED 00540 EQUIPMENT _ ~.800.97 !-----~O_.O_O-+- ______ O_.o_o-+- _____ o_.o___o__ , -l w02 - 1591 COMPEDPARENT/HOMEW0OO12O REGULARNONCERTIFICATED 77,470.53 76,315.76 75,000.00 66,321.84 88.43% 159T ~p ED PARENTIHOMEW000211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED -t----5~,-9_0_6_.3 -9-+----5-',-5_7_91-_5.- +---5-',-7-0-0-0.- 0-+ 4,882 fl 8 5.6 6% 02 1591 7oMPEDPARENTIHOMEWO 00241 INSURANCE.NON-CERT - --6-'-,3-6__7_7 __ 4-+----4-'-,o-5___13__ 2-+ 4,000.00 3,691.97 92.30% f-0-2-+-1_5_9_1 ~MP ED PARENTIHOMEwo00251 UNEMPL0Y COMP, NON CERT +- 150. 88 ~-1-8_0_.4_1-+----~-1-7-5-. 0-0-+------'--7-7-. 3-7-l 44. 21 % 02 1591 COMP ED PARENTIHOMEWO 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 59.51 51.00 75.00 84.70 **********' f---+----,--t- ---,-,---,----+---,------t--------l 02 1591 COMPEDPARENT/HOMEW00O331 PUPILTRANSPORTATION 19,398.53 22,017.72 13,750.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1591 COMPEDPARENTIHOMEW00O334 CARALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1591 COMP ED PARENT/HOMEWO 00335 INDIS-TR-ICTTRAVEL O.0 0 180. 08 _____ o_ _o__ o-+------0-.-0-0 02 1591 COMPEDPARENT/HOMEW0OO41O SUPPLIESANDMATERIALS 8,702.79 7,377.09 3,000.00 1,436.18 ----1 47.87% Q2 1591 COMPEDPARENT/HOMEWoOO44O PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 93.90 0.00 0.00 f----1---l 02 1591 COMP ED PARENTIHOMEWO 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 4.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1591 COMPEOPARENT/HOMEWO QQ54Q-~QUIPMENT 207.84 Q.QQ Q.QQ -- Q.QQ f--+----r - - --- 02 1592 COMPEDELEEXTENDDAY 00120 REGULARNON-CERTIFICATED 19,674.81 23,348.66 0.00 464.42 02 1592 COMPEDELEEXTENDDAY 00211 ~STAX.NON-CERTIFIED 1,506.37 1,787.17 -- 0.00 35.51 02 1592 COMPEDELEEXTENDDAY OO251--\n-NEMPLOYCOMP.NONCERT 0.00 23.72 -- 0.00 0.00 02 1592 COMPEDELEEXTENDDAY OO261-~RKERSCOMP.NON-CERT 12.46 13.63 0.00 0.00 ~-~-~ ----- Page: 45 [ ~ -- - -- - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description Expenses Expenses Budget ~xpenses Exp/Bud 02 - 1592 COMP ED ELE EXTENO DAY 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 194.62 99.46 0.00 0.00 02 1592 COMP ED ELE EXTEND DAY 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,297.14 4,684.54 0.00 0.00 02 -- - 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED ~6,186.00 36,186.00 38,000.00 32,188.18 84.71% 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2,688.26 2,726.15 2,900.00 2,449.51 84.47% 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00240 INSURANCE 1,009.35 863.86 850.00 703.30 82.74% 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 12.20 42.80 50.00 29.46 58.92% - 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00260 WORKERS COMP 24.92 23.70 50.00 40.71 81.42% - . - - 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION - 2,642.47 2,044.00 2,000.00 -- 0.00 0.00% 02 1593 -COMP ED TURNING POINT 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES -- - 133.52 '-- 0.00 0.00 -- o.oo 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 133.52 0.00 0.00 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 712.05 806.06 500.00 440.97 88.19% 02 - -- - 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 47,779.27 52,009.46 21,000.00 9,817.68 46.75% 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 3,655.10 3,617.04 1,600.00 732.76 45.80% 02 - 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00240 INSURANCE 1,688.08 1,717.09 850.00 351.80 41.39% 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 24.40 65.74 25.00 10.52 42.08% f-0-- 2 1594 f-- -- **********\" COMP ED PALS LAB 00260 WORKERS COMP 33.31 29.63 25.00 48.98 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00326 REPAIRSIMAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 73.32 400.00 0.00 0.00% -- 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - -- -- 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 00540 -EQUIPMENT 0.00 782.81 0.00 0.00 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 349,719.41 370,200.00 318,466.78 86.03% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN  45,411.36 44,610.96 47,200.00 0.00 0.00% -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 13,628.88 16,000.00 - 0.00 0.00% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00% - - 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 2,862.00 2,289.00 3,000.00 0.00 0.00% - - - --- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED __0_0 155 ._S_T IPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 560.00 - [ 1['JH1IRX -1CO)lRZ\"JJLrH,Jlll1 l\"1f'1Ll.RJa.Z @CClfP1~U JIB31LlK~CIT IJBICOXO)JL,~ n W n  n WW,11ll l,i\"\u0026lt;JlP~ I1}l))l['Jr'UJIRU~~ l IBYr JF11H~CC1rll(Q)~(Q)IIBJIYE.CC1r n~'UJkillDg ~() llta.ll[))(''( @n r~, J1W\nH'~ttfi@~ @~ D~ _ill)~IIDa\u0026amp;_ 3~fi~__l@D4=1 - - --- -- 91-92 92-93 93-94 93-94 % of Fun Fnct Fnct Descr Object Object Description I Expenses Expenses Budget ~penses Exp/Bud -- - 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED - 00210- SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00210- SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 28,868.47 29,150.00 ~422.98 80.35% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED - 00211 SS TAX. NON-CERTIFIED 218.93 1,153.53 1,500.00 -0.00 0.00% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00212 SS TAX. STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 350.00 0.00 0.00% e-- - - -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.85 --- -- f- 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 11,022.83 10,900.00 8,439.40 77.43% f-0-- 2 1910 - -- -- 0.00- - GIFTED AND TALENTED - 00241 -INSURANCE NON-CERT 0.00 907.90 900.00 0.00% 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 502.75 600.00 291.61 48.60% -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP. NON CERT 0.00 20.68 25.00 0.00 0.00% - ~- - -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 250.83 250.00 400.21 ~*********11 1910- - 00261 -- 02 GIFTED AND TALENTED WORKERS COMP. NON-CERT 0.00 10.14 25.00 0.00 0.00% 02 1910 --- GIFTED AND TALENTED 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 3,010.00 3,470.00 3,500.00 455.00 13.00% - 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 1,410.84 2,804.34 2,500.00 917.81 36.71% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 456.31 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00% I- - 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION - 1,502.50 2,175.00 2,200.00 2,120.00 96.36% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONT-HLY 495.00 495.00 495.00 450.00 90.91% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00335 IND/STRICT TRAVEL 0.00 564.55 700.00 225.41 32.20% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 500.00 30.90 6.18% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00342 POSTAGE 127.53 239.71 300.00 255.24 85.08% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 14,105.36 9,765.87 10,280.00 12,615.80 \"\"*********, - 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 200.00 198.14 99.07% 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 430.93 586.92 600.00 391.98 65.33% -- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- ---- 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 00630 DUES AND FEES 3,070.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 lir*********l -- 01 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 10,040.08 0.00 0.00 -- 02 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 0.00% -- -- 02 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 930.00 0.00 _6,975.00 - - Page: 47 L -- Fun Fnct -- 02 1911 - -- 02 1911 - -\u0026gt;---- 01 1911 02 1911 -02 - - 1911 -01 1911 02 1911 02 1911- 02 1911 02 1911 02 1911 02 1911 1l'JH[l~ ~@lRZ'1(H J! JL11'1['1rll--1mllt @ccoc ff'L(J)filJLIICC~ (C]l![@(D)JL,~ n  n \"n W f\\, )~1\"()P'l~A~O)l['1('UYJRlI\\BH'Wi~ W' 'l(J~CC1rn@~ff@IIBJJ1\u0026amp;ca1r JFUJf:ID)g ( fillll uU[)\n' @n }JO @n\u0026gt;)~lffa1rtfillil~ @ ~ llL_ill)Ib)(t ITWficc(Q ),(lD, - - - 91-92 92-93 93-94 - 93-94 Fnct Descr - Object Object Description Expenses Expenses -- Budg~ Expenses GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 272.00 0.00 0.00 -- - GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- --- GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX - -- 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 761.26 0.00 0.00 - GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00211 SS TAX. NON CERTIFIED 0.00 90.48 460.00 533.65 1-- - GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00250 rU-N-EMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 16.06 0.00 0.00 -- GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON C~RT 0.00 1.77 20.00 8.97 -- GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 6.37 0.00 0.00 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.60 20.00 4.47 --- -GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 -f- 02 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 f- \u0026gt;---- - 02 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00342 POSTAGE 18.56 16.82 0.00 0.00 ~ 02 1911 GIT PROJECT PROMISE 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 39.29 329.27 3,000.00 0.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":31,"next_page":32,"prev_page":30,"total_pages":48,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":360,"total_count":567,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":90},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":73},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":53},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":33},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":6},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":5},{"value":"Office of Education and Lead Planning and Desegregation","hits":5},{"value":"Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"William Gordon Associates","hits":3},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":567},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":561},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":400},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":376},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":351},{"value":"School integration","hits":176},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":174},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":173},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":156},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","hits":144}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":566},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":565},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":555},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":486},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Massachusetts, Middlesex County, Cambridge, Harvard University, 42.377, -71.11666","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":566},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":129},{"value":"1995","hits":120},{"value":"1996","hits":107},{"value":"1993","hits":98},{"value":"1997","hits":93},{"value":"1992","hits":85},{"value":"1998","hits":82},{"value":"1999","hits":81},{"value":"2000","hits":78},{"value":"1991","hits":77},{"value":"2001","hits":72},{"value":"2003","hits":62},{"value":"1990","hits":53},{"value":"2002","hits":53},{"value":"2004","hits":50},{"value":"2005","hits":47},{"value":"1989","hits":39},{"value":"2006","hits":31},{"value":"1988","hits":24},{"value":"2010","hits":21},{"value":"2008","hits":19},{"value":"2009","hits":17},{"value":"2007","hits":15},{"value":"2013","hits":15},{"value":"1986","hits":14},{"value":"2012","hits":14},{"value":"1987","hits":13},{"value":"2011","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"1985","hits":8},{"value":"2014","hits":6},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"1980","hits":4},{"value":"1981","hits":4},{"value":"1982","hits":4},{"value":"1983","hits":4},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"1950","hits":2},{"value":"1951","hits":2},{"value":"1952","hits":2},{"value":"1953","hits":2},{"value":"1954","hits":2},{"value":"1955","hits":2},{"value":"1956","hits":2},{"value":"1957","hits":2},{"value":"1958","hits":2},{"value":"1959","hits":2},{"value":"1960","hits":2},{"value":"1961","hits":2},{"value":"1962","hits":2},{"value":"1963","hits":2},{"value":"1964","hits":2},{"value":"1965","hits":2},{"value":"1966","hits":2},{"value":"1967","hits":2},{"value":"1968","hits":2},{"value":"1969","hits":2},{"value":"1970","hits":2},{"value":"1971","hits":2},{"value":"1972","hits":2},{"value":"2015","hits":1},{"value":"2016","hits":1},{"value":"2017","hits":1},{"value":"2018","hits":1},{"value":"2019","hits":1},{"value":"2020","hits":1},{"value":"2021","hits":1},{"value":"2022","hits":1},{"value":"2023","hits":1},{"value":"2024","hits":1},{"value":"2025","hits":1},{"value":"2026","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2026","count":1641,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":282},{"value":"reports","hits":194},{"value":"filing","hits":49},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":34},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16},{"value":"minutes (administrative records)","hits":16},{"value":"correspondence","hits":3},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"printouts","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":566}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":566},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}