{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1436","title":"Report: ''Student Participation in Extracurricular Activities in the Pulaski County Special School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2001-02-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","Student activities","Education--Standards"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Student Participation in Extracurricular Activities in the Pulaski County Special School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1436"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["21 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_903","title":"Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2001/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/903"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["98 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nNORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED SEP- 9 2002 OFFICEOF DEHE6ATIONIOIITORIN6 ANALYSIS Of DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS District Level FRANCICAJ.LJ ACKSON Directoorf StudenAtf fairs Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 7/15/02 16:20:19 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions DISTRICT LEVEL From AUGUST Through JUNE ========================================%======================================= 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ========================================-==---==========--------------======-=== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================================--==-------====-----------------------==---- 09 S. A. C. 1092 55-1% 556 28-0% 266 13-4% 69 3-5% 1983 517 292 175 52 1036 10 HOME SUSP. 385 70-3% 92 16-8% 64 11. 7% 7 1-3% 548 205 71 41 6 323 11 BOYS CLUB 325 61-4% 136 25- 7% 56 10-6% 12 2-3% 529 203 84 47 9 343 12 E. I. C. 162 58-5% 55 19-9% 40 14-4% 20 7-2% 277 101 44 23 10 178 17 EXPULSION 3 27-3% 0 -0% 5 45-5% 3 27-3% 11 3 0 5 3 11 ===---===--------------=================-------=========--------------========== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -==--===========---------==========-------------------------------------====--== -----BM------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU --===---========--==================-----------------------------------========- 09 S. A. C. 1276 55-2% 574 24-8% 354 15-3% 107 4-6% 2311 566 322 205 68 1161 10 HOME susp. 692 66-6% 234 22-5% 92 8-9% 21 2-0% 1039 370 135 68 11 584 11 BOYS CLUB 210 59-0% 83 23-3% 52 14-6% 11 3-1% 356 135 55 39 11 240 12 E I. C. 342 56-8% 164 27-2% 67 11-1% 29 4-8% 602 172 84 46 19 321 17 EXPULSION 1 25-0% 0 -0% 2 50-0% 1 25-0% 4 1 0 2 1 4 =---====-==============-------------------------------------------=======--=-==- COMPARISON -----==---------===========--------------------------------------=======-==-=--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -----==-=-------========-----------------------------------------======-=------- 09 S. A. C. 184 16-8 % 18 3-2 % 88 33-1 % 38 55-1 % 328 49 30 30 16 125 10 HOME SUSP. 307 79.7 % 142 154,3 % 28 43,8 % 14 200.0 % 491 165 64 27 5 261 11 BOYS CLUB 115- 35-4-% 53- 39-0-% 4- 7-1-% 1- 8-3-% 173- 68- 29- 8- 2 103- 12 E. I. C. 180 111.1 % 109 198-2 % 27 67,5 % 9 45-0 % 325 71 40 23 9 143 17 EXPULSION 2- 66-7-% 0 . 0 % 3- 60-0-% 2- 66-7-% 7- 2- 0 3- 2- 7- Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 7/15/02 16:20:19 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions ELEMENTARYK -5 From AUGUST Through JUNE ================================================================================ 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU -----BF------ 11 REF PCT/TOT II STU -----NBM----- 11 REF PCT/TOT II STU -----NBF----- 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU ================================-====---------========-=======-================= 09 S. A. C. 25 48-1% 19 36-5% 6 11-5% 2 3-8% 52 21 13 5 2 41 10 HOME SUSP. 202 70-1% 55 19-1% 28 9-7% 3 1-0% 288 123 42 21 3 189 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 162 58-5% 55 19-9% 40 14-4% 20 7-2% 277 101 44 23 10 178 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --=====---------===============-----------------=====--=-==============--------- 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 ---=======----===========----------------------------------=-=========---======= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II STU II STU II STU II STU ----=====================-----------------------=-------==-============--======= 09 S. A. C. 4 80-0% 1 20-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 5 4 1 0 0 5 10 HOME SUSP- 335 68-5% 105 21-5% 42 8-6% 7 1-4% 489 186 64 28 3 281 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 ,0% 0 ,0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E, I. C. 341 56, 7% 164 27-3% 67 11-1% 29 4-8% 601 171 84 46 19 320 17 EXPULSION 0 ,0% 0 ,0% 0 -0% 0 ,0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =---------=----=------------------------------------------------=====----------- COMPARISON =-------=--===--=-----------------------------------------------=--==----------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- 11 REF PCT(+/-) 11 REF PCT(+/-) 11 REF PCT(+/-) 11 REF PCT(+/-) II STU # STU II STU II STU =-----=--=====--===--------------------------------------------==--===---------- 09 S. A. C. 21- 84,0-% 18- 94-7-% 6- 100,0-% 2- 100,0-% 47- 17- 12- 5- 2- 36- 10 HOME SUSP. 133 65-8 % 50 90,9 % 14 50-0 % 4 133-3 % 201 63 22 7 0 92 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 179 110.s % 109 198,2 % 27 67,5 % 9 45-0 % 324 70 40 23 9 142 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 c't ~ \" Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 7/15/02 16:20:19 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions MIDDLE SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through JUNE =======================--------------------------=============================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT ll REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU ll STU ll STU # STU ================================----========-=================================== 09 S. A. C. 500 54-0% 260 28-1% 131 14-1% 35 3-8% 926 254 136 85 26 501 10 HOME SUSP. 104 74-8% 18 12-9% 16 11-5% 1 -7% 139 35 11 8 1 55 11 BOYS CLUB 175 58-3% 88 29-3% 29 9-7% 8 2-7% 300 99 48 22 5 174 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 2 2 0 0 0 2 =---===========================------------------=====---==---================-- 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 =--======================================-----==============================--== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT ll REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU ll STU # STU ==--=======================================================================-===- 09 S. A. C. 688 55-2% 342 27-4% 182 14-6% 34 2-7% 1246 319 193 108 25 645 10 HOME SUSP. 205 62-9% 94 28-8% 22 6-7% 5 1-5% 326 102 52 17 4 175 11 BOYS CLUB 125 53-9% 66 28-4% 33 14-2% 8 3-4% 232 73 42 26 8 149 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 33-3% 0 -0% 1 33-3% 1 33-3% 3 1 0 1 1 3 --=---======----==============-------------------------=================--====-- COMPARISON ------======--================-----------------------=====================-==--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) ll REF PCT(+/-) ll REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU ll STU ll STU # STU ---=-======-====-====================-=-=----===============================---- 09 S. A. C. 188 37-6 % 82 31-5 % 51 38-9 % 1- 2-9-% 320 65 57 23 1- 144 10 HOME SUSP. 101 97-1 % 76 422-2 % 6 37.5 % 4 400-0 % 187 67 41 9 3 120 11 BOYS CLUB 50- 28-6-% 22- 25-0-% 4 13-8 % 0 . 0 % 68- 26- 6- 4 3 25- 12 E I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 EXPULSION 1- 50-0-% 0 . o % 1 100-0 % 1 100.0 % 1 1- 0 1 1 1 Ref: Date: Time: DIS032 7/15/02 16:20:19 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions HIGH SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through JUNE --------=====-------------------------------------=======================---==== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -----===============------------------------------=-=--=====---================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 567 56-4% 277 27-6% 129 12-8% 32 3-2% 1005 242 143 85 24 494 10 HOME susp. 79 65-3% 19 15- 7% 20 16-5% 3 2-5% 121 47 18 12 2 79 11 BOYS CLUB 150 65-5% 48 21-0% 27 11-8% 4 1-7% 229 104 36 25 4 169 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 11-1% 0 -0% 5 55-6% 3 33-3% 9 1 0 5 3 9 -=-============================================================================- 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -=============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=============================================================================-= 09 S. A. C. 584 55-1% 231 21-8% 172 16-2% 73 6-9% 1060 243 128 98 43 512 10 HOME SUSP. 152 67-9% 35 15-6% 28 12-5% 9 4-0% 224 82 19 23 4 128 11 BOYS CLUB 85 68-5% 17 13- 7% 19 15-3% 3 2-4% 124 62 13 13 3 91 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 100-0% 0 -0% 1 0 0 1 0 1 ----=======-===----=========================================================-=== COMPARISON ----=======-=====--========================================================-==== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU II STU ---=-=======------=======================================================--===-- 09 S. A. C. 17 3.0 % 46- 16-6-% 43 33,3 % 41 128.1 % 55 1 15- 13 19 18 10 HOME SUSP. 73 92-4 % 16 84-2 % 8 40,0 % 6 200.0 % 103 35 1 11 2 49 11 BOYS CLUB 65- 43-3-% 31- 64-6-% 8- 29,6-% 1- 25,0-% 105- 42- 23- 12- 1- 78- 12 E I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 EXPULSION 1- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 4- 80-0-% 3- 100-0-% 8- 1- 0 4- 3- 8- Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:19 School: 012 NORTH Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 11/12 ======-================--=-----=-------------------------------------=========== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ======--=====================--======-----------------------------------=====-== -----BM------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU ===--------------====================--------============------------=========== 09 S. A. C. 142 51-6% 68 24-7% 53 19-3% 12 4-4% 275 87 50 40 9 186 10 HOME SUSP. 3 42-9% 2 28-6% 2 28-6% 0 -0% 7 3 2 2 0 7 11 BOYS CLUB 52 57-1% 19 20-9% 18 19-8% 2 2-2% 91 43 16 17 2 78 12 E. I. c. 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 50-0% 0 -0% 1 50-0% 0 -0% 2 1 0 1 0 2 --====================================---=============-==-------------========== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -========================================================-==------============== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===============-=============================================================== 09 S. A. C. 148 47-9% 80 25-9% 62 20-1% 19 6-1% 309 94 53 43 13 203 10 HOME SUSP- 4 33-3% 2 16-7% 6 50-0% 0 -0% 12 4 2 6 0 12 11 BOYS CLUB 28 62-2% 7 15-6% 9 20-0% 1 2-2% 45 25 6 8 1 40 12 E. I. C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=-=======================================================---=-================= COMPARISON -=--==================================--------=-==========--------===========-== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU --==========================================================================-=== 09 S. A. C. 6 4-2 % 12 17-6 % 9 17-0 % 7 58-3 % 34 7 3 3 4 17 10 HOME SUSP. 1 33.3 % 0 . D % 4 200-0 % 0 . 0 % 5 1 0 4 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 24- 46-2-% 12- 63-2-% 9- 50-0-% 1- 50-0-% 46- 18- 10- 9- 1- 38- 12 E. I. C. 0 . o % 0 D % D . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 1- 100-0-% 0 .o % 2- 1- 0 1- 0 2- Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:20 School: 013 NORTH Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 09/10 =====================================----------==========-----------============ 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 =-----======---=-====================-----------=======-----------------=-===-=- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ======------=========================-----------========------------------===--- 09 S. A. C. 424 58-2% 209 28- 7% 76 10-4% 20 2-7% 729 155 95 46 15 311 10 HOME SUSP- 4 66- 7% 2 33-3% 0 -0% 0 -0% 6 4 2 0 0 6 11 BOYS CLUB 98 71-0% 29 21-0% 9 6-5% 2 1-4% 138 62 20 8 2 92 12 E- I- C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 4 -0% 3 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 4 57-1% 3 42-9% 7 0 0 4 3 7 -========================================================-=====-================ 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -========================================================--=----================ -----BM------ 11 REF PCT /TOT 11 STU -----BF------ 11 REF PCT/TOT 11 STU -----NBM----- 11 REF PCT /TOT 11 STU -----NBF----- 11 REF PCT /TOT 11 STU -=============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 433 57-9% 151 20-2% 110 14-7% 54 7-2% 748 149 76 55 30 310 10 HOME SUSP- 29 76-3% 1 2-6% 8 21-1% 0 -0% 38 24 1 8 0 33 11 BOYS CLUB 57 72-2% 10 12- 7% 10 12-7% 2 2-5% 79 38 7 5 2 52 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 100-0% 0 -0% 1 0 0 1 0 1 -=-===================================---------===========---=================== COMPARISON -=--===========-======================---------============-===============-==== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU --=============--==========================================================-===09 S. A. C. 9 2-1 % 58- 27-8-% 34 44-7 % 34 170-0 % 19 6- 19- 9 15 1- 10 HOME SUSP- 25 625-0 % 1- 50-0-% 8 800-0 % 0 . 0 % 32 20 1- 8 0 27 11 BOYS CLUB 41- 41-8-% 19- 65-5-% 1 11-1 % 0 . 0 % 59- 24- 13- 3- 0 40- 12 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 3- 75-0-% 3- 100-0-% 6- 0 0 3- 3- 6- Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:20 School: 020 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE ARGENTA ACADEMY =---------------====================-----------------------------------===-=--== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 =---========---=--=--===============------------=====-------------------======== -----BM------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU ====---=---=====-===================-------------=====-----------------=====--=- 09 S -A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 172 71-4% 32 13-3% 33 13- 7% 4 1-7% 241 72 24 17 3 116 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E- I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---===========================---=----.------------------------------------=--== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --===================================-----==-===========--===---=-============== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =-============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 224 66- 7% 81 24-1% 20 6-0% 11 3-3% 336 87 33 12 5 137 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -===========----============================================================-=-= COMPARISON -=-====================================--======================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU II STU II STU # STU -=-======----=======================-----------=========-=================-===== 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 D 10 HOME SUSP. 52 30-2 % 49 153-1 % 13- 39-4-% 7 175-0 % 95 15 9 5- 2 21 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % EJ . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 EXPULSION 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:20 School: 024 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL -======================-=----==-======-----------=========----------============ 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=====================================----------==========-------------========= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===========================================================----================ 09 S -A. C. 154 50-8% 97 32-0% 42 13-9% 10 3-3% 303 83 49 26 7 165 10 HOME SUSP. 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 11 BOYS CLUB 112 59-3% 52 27-5% 19 10-1% 6 3-2% 189 57 26 14 3 100 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 2 2 0 0 0 2 -=-=======================================================---------============= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -=-============================================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --=-==========================================================-================= 09 S. A. C. 318 59-2% 123 22-9% 84 15-6% 12 2-2% 537 127 66 46 8 247 10 HOME SUSP. 64 75-3% 13 15-3% 6 7-1% 2 2-4% 85 42 10 6 2 60 11 BOYS CLUB 97 63-4% 39 25-5% 13 8-5% 4 2-6% 153 50 21 9 4 84 12 E.r.c 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---============================================================================= COMPARISON ---============--=============================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =---=========================================================================-=- 09 S A. C. 164 106-5 % 26 26-8 % 42 100.0 % 2 20.0 % 234 44 17 20 1 82 10 HOME SUSP. 63 6300-0 % 13 1300-0 % 6 600-0 % 2 200.0 % 84 41 10 6 2 59 11 BOYS CLUB 15- 13-4-% 13- 25-0-% 6- 31-6-% 2- 33-3-% 36- 7- 5- 5- 1 16- 12 E-I-c. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 EXPULSION 2- 100-0-% 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 2- 2- 0 0 0 2- .II 1, 1: Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:20 School: 025 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE LAKEWOODM IDDLE SCHOOL ===========================================-==================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 =====================================----------==========------------=========== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -========================================================----------============= 09 S. A. C. 117 49-0% 56 23-4% 50 20-9% 16 6-7% 239 59 30 34 11 134 10 HOME susp. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 27 55-1% 17 34. 7% 4 8-2% 1 2-0% 49 19 9 4 1 33 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --===----==------==========================================------=============== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 =-============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 110 45-3% 66 27-2% 53 21-8% 14 5-8% 243 58 39 33 11 141 10 HOME SUSP. 2 66-7% 1 33-3% 0 -0% 0 -0% 3 2 1 0 0 3 11 BOYS CLUB 11 29-7% 14 37-8% 10 27-0% 2 5-4% 37 10 10 9 2 31 12 E. I. C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 33-3% 0 -0% 1 33-3% 1 33-3% 3 1 0 1 1 3 --============================================================================== COMPARISON --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================- 09 S. A. C. 7- 6-0-% 10 17-9 % 3 6-0 % 2- 12-5-% 4 1- 9 1- 0 7 10 HOME SUSP. 2 200.0 % 1 100.0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 3 2 1 0 0 3 11 BOYS CLUB 16- 59-3-% 3- 17-6-% 6 150-0 % 1 100.0 % 12- 9- 1 5 1 2- 12 E-I.c. 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 100.0 % 0 . 0 % 1 100.0 % 1 100.0 % 3 1 0 1 1 3 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 026 ROSE Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL ---=========-===-====================------------=====-==----------------====-=- 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ====---=====================-========------------------------------------------- -----BM------ 11 REF PCT/TOT II STU -----BF------ 11 REF PCT/TOT II STU -----NBM----- 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU -----NBF----- 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU ===-----=======--====================----------======--==-----------------===--- 09 S. A. C. 56 47-9% 44 37-6% 9 7-7% 8 6-8% 117 34 26 9 7 76 10 HOME SUSP. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 17 51-5% 12 36-4% 3 9-1% 1 3-0% 33 10 7 2 1 20 12 E- I- C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =-============================================================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT/TOT II REF PCT /TOT II STU II STU II STU II STU --============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 90 48-4% 70 37-6% 23 12-4% 3 1-6% 186 53 41 15 2 111 10 HOME SUSP- 7 33-3% 10 47-6% 4 19-0% 0 -0% 21 7 10 3 0 20 11 BOYS CLUB 14 40-0% 10 28-6% 9 25- 7% 2 5-7% 35 11 8 7 2 28 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---========================================================================-=-== COMPARISON --===========================================================================--= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCTC+/-) II REF PCTC+/-l II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCTC+/-l II STU II STU II STU II STU --=======================================================================-====-- 09 S. A. C. 34 60,7 % 26 59-1 % 14 155-6 % 5- 62-5-% 69 19 15 6 5- 35 10 HOME SUSP- 7 700-0 % 10 1000.0 % 4 400-0 % 0 . 0 % 21 7 10 3 0 20 11 BOYS CLUB 3- 17-6-% 2- 16-7-% 6 200-0 % 1 100-0 % 2 1 1 5 1 12 8 E.I.c. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 .o % 0 . o % 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 030 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL -================================-====---------================================= 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 174 64-9% 63 23-5% 30 11-2% 1 -4% 268 82 32 18 1 133 10 HOME SUSP. 3 60-0% 1 20-0% 1 20-0% 0 -0% 5 3 1 1 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 19 65-5% 7 24-1% 3 10-3% 0 -0% 29 15 6 2 0 23 12 E. I. c. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ================================================================================ 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 ===============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===========================================================================-=== 09 S. A. C. 173 61-1% 83 29-3% 22 7-8% 5 1-8% 283 88 50 15 4 157 10 HOME susp. 27 49-1% 21 38-2% 6 10-9% 1 1-8% 55 20 16 5 1 42 11 BOYS CLUB 3 42-9% 3 42-9% 1 14-3% 0 -0% 7 3 3 1 0 7 12 E-I-c 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --=========================================================================-==-- COMPARISON ----======================================================================-===-- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU :--==================================================================09 S. A. C. 1- -6-% 20 31-7 % 8- 26-7-% 4 400-0 % 15 6 18 3- 3 24 10 HOME susp. 24 800-0 % 20 2000.0 % 5 500-0 % 1 100.0 % 50 17 15 4 1 11 37 BOYS CLUB 16- 84-2-% 4- 57-1-% 2- 66-7-% 0 . 0 % 22- 12- 3- 1- 0 16- 12 E I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 031 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE AMBOYE LEMENTARYS CHOOL =========================================------================================= 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ======================================----------======--======================== -----BM------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----BF------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBM----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # STU -=====================================----====================================== 09 S. A. C. 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 10 HOME SUSP. 24 52-2% 16 34-8% 5 10-9% 1 2-2% 46 13 11 5 1 30 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=-===============================--=--~---===================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -==============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S. A. C. 4 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 4 4 0 0 0 4 10 HOME SUSP. 78 71-6% 24 22-0% 7 6-4% 0 -0% 109 39 12 4 0 55 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I-c 33 56-9% 14 24-1% 11 19-0% 0 -0% 58 21 11 9 0 41 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---===========================================================================-- COMPARISON ---=====================================================================-----=== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =--====================================================================-=====--- 09 S A. C. 3 300-0 % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 3 3 0 0 0 3 10 HOME SUSP. 54 225-0 % 8 50-0 % 2 40-0 % 1- 100.0-% 63 26 1 1- 1- 25 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 D D 0 0 0 12 E-I.c. 33 . 0 % 14 . 0 % 11- .o % 0 . o % 58 33 14 11 0 41 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 032 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE LAKEWOODEL EMENTARYS CHOOL -=============================================================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -==========================--==---============================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II STU II STU II STU II STU -=============================================================================== 09 S -A. C. 0 - % 0 - % D - % 0 -0% D D D 0 0 D 10 HOME SUSP. 0 -0% 2 66- 7% 1 33-3% 0 - % 3 0 2 1 0 3 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% D -0% 0 -0% D 0 0 D 0 D 12 E. I- C. D -0% 0 - % 0 - % 0 - % D 0 0 0 0 D 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% D 0 D D 0 D --============================================================================== 2 D 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II STU II STU # STU II STU -===========================================================================---= 09 S -A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% D 0 0 0 0 D 10 HOME SUSP. 3 37-5% 5 62-5% D - % 0 -0% 8 2 3 0 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 D 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% D 0 0 0 0 D 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 D ----======================================================================-====- COMPARISON ----=====================================================================-====-- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCTC+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II STU II STU II STU II STU =--=====================================================================-====--- 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . o % D 0 0 0 0 D 10 HOME SUSP- 3 300-0 % 3 150-0 % 1- 100-0-% 0 -0 % 5 2 1 1- 0 2 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % D 0 0 0 0 D 12 E-r.c. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % D -0 % D 0 0 0 D D 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 .o % D .o % D 0 0 0 D D Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 033 BOONE Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE PARK ELEMENTARYS CHOOL -======================-------------------------=============-==-==-============ 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -============================------------------========-=====-=---=-============ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ================================================================================ 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 48 80-0% 11 18-3% 1 1-7% 0 -0% 60 29 7 1 0 37 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. c. 42 84-0% 8 16-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 50 33 6 0 0 39 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---============================================================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================- 09 S. A. c. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME susp. 90 67-2% 35 26-1% 4 3-0% 5 3-7% 134 39 18 2 1 60 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.c 77 63-1% 38 31-1% 1 -8% 6 4-9% 122 44 22 1 4 71 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --=========================================================================-===- COMPARISON --=============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---======================================================================-=----- 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 42 87-5 % 24 218-2 % 3 300-0 % 5 500-0 % 74 10 11 1 1 23 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I.c. 35 . 0 % 30 . 0 % 1 . 0 % 6 . 0 % 72 1 4 1 6 32 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 035 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE SEVENTHS TREET ELEMENTARYS CHOOL -=============================================================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU '# STU -=============================================================================== 09 S -A. C. 11 84-6% 2 15-4% 0 -0% 0 -0% 13 7 2 0 0 9 10 HOME SUSP- 12 57-1% 6 28-6% 3 14-3% 0 -0% 21 9 4 1 0 14 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 44 68-8% 18 28-1% 0 3-1% 0 -0% 64 24 13 2 0 39 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --=====================================-========================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --===========================================================================--- 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 16 94-1% 1 5-9% 0 -0% 0 -0% 17 10 1 0 0 11 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I-C 74 63-2% 37 31-6% 2 1-7% 4 3-4% 117 40 21 2 4 67 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :---==========================================================================-- COMPARISON =--========================================================================-==-- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =--======================================================================-==---- 09 S. A. C. 11- 100-0-% 2- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 13- 7- 2- 0 0 9- 10 HOME SUSP. 4 33.3 % 5- 83-3-% 3- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 4- 1 3- 1- 0 3- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 30 . 0 % 19 . 0 % . 0 % 4 .o % 53 1 1 0 4 28 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . o % D .o % D 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 037 LYNCH Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE DRIVE ELEMENTARYS CHOOL -=======================================-===--================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME susp. 22 84-6% 3 11-5% 1 3-8% 0 -0% 26 16 3 1 0 20 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 8 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 8 8 0 0 0 8 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=-============================================================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 16 72- 7% 2 9-1% 4 18-2% 0 -0% 22 14 2 1 0 17 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E,I.C 10 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 10 7 0 0 0 7 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---======================================================================-====-- COMPARISON =--==========================================================================--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =--==================================================================09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 D % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 D 0 10 HOME SUSP. 6- 27-3-% 1- 33-3-% 3 300-0 % 0 . 0 % 4- 2- 1- 0 0 3- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 2 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 2 0 0 0 0 1- 17 EXPULSION D . 0 % D . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 040 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE MEADOWPA RK ELEMENTARYS CHOOL ======================================---------==============-----=-============ 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -==========-=-================-=-===-------------=---------------------------=-- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===----------------==========================================--================ 09 S. A. C. 3 75-0% 1 25-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 4 3 1 0 0 4 10 HOME susp. 27 77-1% 4 11-4% 3 8-6% 1 2-9% 35 20 3 2 1 26 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=-============================.============= =================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME susp. 51 67-1% 21 27-6% 4 5-3% 0 -0% 76 26 12 3 0 41 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I.c 0 -0% 0 -0% 2 100-0% 0 -0% 2 0 0 2 0 2 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =--==========================================================================-=- COMPARISON :--=========================================================================-=-= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU :--=======================================================================-==--- 09 S. A. C. 3- 100-0-% 1- 100,0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 4- 3- 1- 0 0 4- 10 HOME SUSP. 24 88-9 % 17 425-0 % 1 33.3 % 1- 100-0-% 41 6 9 1 1- 15 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % .2 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 2 17 0 0 2 0 2 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 041 NORTH Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE HEIGHTS ELEMENTARYS CHOOL =======-----==========================-----------=====---=---------------------- 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=======-----==================-======------------------------------------------ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=====================================----=--=============----------------====-- 09 S. A. C. D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 - % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 14 73-7% 1 5-3% 4 21-1% 0 -0% 19 9 1 4 0 14 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I- C. 52 47-3% 15 13-6% 0 26-4% 0 12. 7% 110 26 12 15 6 59 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --============================================================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S.A.C. 0 -0% D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 D 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 15 57. 7% 2 7-7% 9 34-6% 0 - % 26 13 2 7 0 22 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 D 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 110 52-6% 51 24-4% 35 16- 7% 13 6,2% 209 38 14 20 7 79 17 EXPULSION D -0% 0 ,0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 D 0 0 0 =---============================================================================ COMPARISON :----=======================================================================-=-= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU :----=========================================================================== 09 S A. C. 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 10 0 D 0 0 0 HOME SUSP. 1 7-1 % 1 100.0 % 5 125,0 % 0 . 0 % 7 11 4 1 3 0 8 BOYS CLUB 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 E I. C. 58 . 0 % 36 . 0 % 6 . 0 % 1- . D % 99 17 1 2 6 1- 20 EXPULSION 0 . o % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 042 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE CRESTWOODE LEMENTARYS CHOOL -===========================---=-==-==--=-----================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=============================================================================== 09 S. A. c. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 45 81-8% 6 10-9% 4 7-3% 0 -0% 55 20 5 2 0 27 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 D 1 0 D 1 17 EXPULSION D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --============================================================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 .0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 D 0 10 HOME SUSP- 30 83-3% 5 13-9% 0 -0% 1 2-8% 36 17 5 0 1 23 11 BOYS CLUB D -0% D -0% 0 -0% D -0% 0 0 0 0 D 0 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 - % D -0% 0 0 0 0 D 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 - % D -0% 0 - % 0 D 0 0 D 0 ~---========================================================================--=- COMPARISON :---========================================================================-=-- -----BM------ # REF PCT(+/-) # STU -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU :---===========================================================-=-=--====09 S. A. C. 0 . D % D . 0 % D . 0 % D . 0 % 0 0 D D 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 15- 33.3-% 1- 16-7-% 4- 100-0-% 1 100.0 % 19- 11 3- 0 2- 1 4- BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D D % 0 . 0 % 0 12 0 D D 0 0 E I. C. 0 . D % 1- . 0 % D . D % 0 . 0 % 1- 17 D 1- D 0 1- EXPULSION D . D % D D % D . 0 % D .o % 0 D D D 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 043 PARK Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE HILL ELEMENTARYS CHOOL ==---=======---=--====================------------=-----==---------------------- 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=--==============--=-===-=----------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --===-=====-------=================-=------------=========---------------------- 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 2 28-6% 0 -0% 5 71. 4% 0 -0% 7 2 0 4 0 6 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 2 20-0% 4 40-0% 0 30-0% 0 10-0% 10 2 4 2 1 9 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --====================================~========================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 -======--=--==================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S. A. c. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 10 66- 7% 1 6- 7% 4 26-7% 0 -0% 15 6 1 4 0 11 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I.c 6 40-0% 1 6- 7% 7 46-7% 1 6-7% 15 6 1 7 1 15 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :---=========================================================================-== COMPARISON :--=========-=-===============================================================-= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # REF PCTC+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU :--=========----============================================================-=-= 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SUSP. 8 400-0 % 1 100.0 % 1- 20-0-% 0 . 0 % 8 11 4 1 0 0 5 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 E I. C. 4 . 0 % 3- . 0 % 4 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 5 17 2 1- 4 0 6 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 044 PIKE Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE VIEW ELEMENTARYS CHOOL =============================================-===========---------============== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 --===================================----------=======---------------------==--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --=======================================================-------------------=--- 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 6 75-0% 2 25-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 8 6 2 0 0 8 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 14 41-2% 9 26-5% 0 17-6% 0 14. 7% 34 11 8 4 3 26 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --============================================================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 ----=================================-===========================-----========== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME susp. 10 55-6% 6 33-3% 2 11-1% 0 -0% 18 8 5 2 0 15 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I.c 31 53-4% 18 31-0% 5 8-6% 4 6-9% 58 18 11 3 2 34 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ==--=================================-========================================== COMPARISON ::---================================--========================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU II STU # STU ::---=======================================================================-== 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 HOME SUSP. 4 66-7 % 4 200.0 % 2 200.0 % 0 .o % 10 11 2 3 2 0 7 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 E I. C. 17 . 0 % 9 . 0 % 1- . 0 % 1- . o % 24 17 1 1 1- 1- 8 EXPULSION 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 D % 0 . o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 045 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE BELWOODE LEMENTARYS CHOOL =====================================--------=-===============---=============== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=========--==-======================-----------======--=----------------=-==--= -----BM------ 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU -----BF------ 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU -----NBM----- 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU -----NBF----- 11 REF PCT /TOT II STU --=============-=====================-----------===------------------------=---- 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 0 - % D -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I- C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 - % 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 - % 0 - % 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---===========================.================== ============--================= 2 0 D 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II REF PCT /TOT II STU II STU II STU II STU --============================================================================== 09 S -A. C. 0 -0% 0 - % 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 D 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 6 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% D -0% 6 4 D 0 0 4 11 BOYS CLUB 0 - % 0 - % 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 D 0 D 0 0 12 E. I. C 0 -0% 0 - % 0 -0% D -0% 0 0 D 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 - % D - % D -0% D -0% 0 0 D D 0 0 :---==============================-------------================================= COMPARISON :--============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II REF PCT(+/-) II STU II STU II STU II STU =---======================================================================--=-=- 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D . 0 % D . 0 % 0 D 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 6 600-0 % D . 0 % 0 . D % D . o % 6 4 D 0 D 4 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 D % D .o % 0 12 0 0 0 D 0 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 17 0 0 0 D 0 EXPULSION 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 D D D D 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 046 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYS CHOOL ===========---========================----------======-=-=---------------------- 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -===--------------====================-----------=-=---------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --==========--==========================================------------------------ 09 S-A-C. 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 10 HOME SUSP. 1 50-0% 0 -0% 1 50-0% 0 -0% 2 1 0 1 0 2 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---============================================================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 ---============================================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S -A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 9 60-0% 3 20-0% 3 20-0% 0 -0% 15 8 3 2 0 13 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I.c 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~---=========================================================================== COMPARISON ~~--=========================================================================-=- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ~~--=======================================================================--=-= 09 S. A. C. 1- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1- 10 1- 0 0 0 1- HOME SUSP. 8 800-0 % 3 300-0 % 2 200-0 % 0 . 0 % 13 11 7 3 1 0 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 E.I.c. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 EXPULSION 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7/15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 048 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARYS CHOOL --============================================================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -=============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -=============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 9 27-3% 16 48-5% 6 18-2% 2 6-1% 33 9 10 5 2 26 10 HOME SUSP- 1 20-0% 3 60-0% 0 -0% 1 20-0% 5 1 3 0 1 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E- I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -=-============================================================================= 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --=============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================================================-= 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 0 1 0 0 1 10 HOME susp. 1 14-3% 0 -0% 5 71-4% 1 14-3% 7 1 0 3 1 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 1 9-1% 5 45-5% 4 36-4% 1 9-1% 11 1 5 3 1 10 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 :--===============================================,======================= -====- COMPARISON :--============================================================================- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ==-===================================================================~----====- 09 S. A. C. 9- 100-0-% 15- 93-8-% 6- 100-0-% 2- 100-0-% 32- 9- 9- 5- 2- 25- 10 HOME SUSP- 0 . 0 % 3- 100-0-% 5 500-0 % 0 . 0 % 2 11 0 3- 3 0 0 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 E I. C. 1 . 0 % 5 . o % 4 . 0 % 1 . 0 % 11 17 1 5 4 1 10 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 7 /15/02 Time: 16:20:21 School: 049 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE REDWOODPR E-SCHOOL ============================================-=================================== 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 ================================================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =-============================================================================== 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP- 0 -0% 1 100-0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 1 0 1 0 0 1 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 --============================================================================== 2 0 0 1 - 0 2 --============================================================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============================================================================= 09 S. A. C. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E-I-C 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 -0% 0 0 0 0 0 D 17 EXPULSION D -0% 0 -0% D -0% D -0% D 0 0 0 0 D ~--===========================================================================-= COMPARISON ::--==========================================================================-= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ::--=======================================================================-==== 09 S. A. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 10 0 0 0 0 D HOME SUSP- 0 . 0 % 1- 100-0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1- 11 0 1- 0 0 1- BOYS CLUB 0 . o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 12 0 0 0 0 D E.I.c. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % D . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 17 0 0 D 0 0 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % D . 0 % D . o % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Discipline Actions SchooIYear2001-2002 District Level Elementary Middle Schools High Schools 9 Year Comparison North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 09: SAC 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 BM BF NBM NBF D 00-01 1092 556 267 69 01-02 1276 574 354 107 00-01 01-02 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 El 00-01 0 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF 385 92 64 7 692 234 92 21 El 00-01 01-02 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF 325 136 56 12 210 83 52 11 00-01 01-02 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 12: Alt School Susp K-5 BM BF NBM NBF 162 55 40 21 342 164 67 29 EJ 00-01 01-02 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 17: Expulsion BM BF NBM NBF 3 0 5 3 1 0 2 1 00-01 01-02 25 20 15 10 5 0 D 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 09: SAC BM BF NBM NBF 25 19 6 2 4 1 0 0 00-01 001-02 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF 202 55 28 3 335 105 42 7 Lt! 00-01 D 01-02 I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 11: Boys Club 1 _,, 0.9 _v 0 8 _v 0.7 _v 0.6 _v 0.5 _v 0.4 _,, 0.3- 0.2 _,, 0.1 _,, 0 BM BF NBM NBF 00-01 0 0 0 0 01-02 0 0 0 0 00-01 01-02 I 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 00-01 D 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 12: Alt School Susp K-5 BM BF NBM NBF 162 55 40 21 341 164 67 29 [I 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 17: Expulsion 1 _,, 0.9 _v o.a- 0.7 _/ 0.6- o.s- 0.4- 0.3- 0.2- 0.1 _,, 0 BM BF NBM NBF 00-01 0 0 0 0 01-02 0 0 0 0 !P.2100-01 01-02 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 09: SAC BM BF NBM NBF 500 260 131 35 688 342 182 34 00-01 01-02 250 200 150 100 50 0 00-01 00-01 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF 104 18 16 1 205 94 22 5 B20I 0-01 00-01 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF 175 88 29 8 125 66 33 8 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 12: Alt School Susp K-5 1 _,, 0.9 _/ 0.8- 0.7 _/ 0.6 _,, 0.5- 0.4 _/ 0.3 _,, 0.2- 0.1 - 0 J BM BF NBM NBF D 00-01 0 0 0 0 01-02 0 0 0 0 [81 00-01 01-02 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 00-01 D 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 17: Expulsion BM BF NBM NBF 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 B 00-01 01-02 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 D 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 09: SAC BM BF NBM NBF 567 277 130 32 584 231 172 73 [B 00-01 01-02 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF 79 19 20 3 152 35 28 9 @l 00-01 01-02 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF 150 48 27 4 85 17 19 3 [J 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 12: Alt School Susp K-5 1 _/ 0.9-\" 0.8-\" 0.7 _,, 0.6 _,, 0.5-\" 0.4-\" 0.3- 0.2-\" 0.1 _,, 0 , , BM BF NBM NBF 00-01 0 0 0 0 01-02 0 0 0 0 lil 00-01 01-02 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 D 00-01 D 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 17: Expulsion BM BF NBM NBF 1 0 5 3 0 0 1 0 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 9 Year Comparison Action 09: SAC 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 BM BF NBM NBF 93-94 977 529 449 156 94.95 869 460 411 126 95-96 1052 446 410 140 96-97 1264 55 469 142 97-98 1801 862 547 132 98-99 1443 718 458 138 99-00 1468 662 401 139 00-01 1092 556 267 69 1276 574 354 107 El 93-94 94.95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 9 Year Comparison Action 10: Home Suspension 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 BM BF NBM NBF 93-94 231 60 76 22 94-95 236 106 103 20 95-96 162 46 47 3 96-97 591 208 125 17 97-98 511 125 104 13 98-99 566 141 125 22 99-00 406 113 102 18 00-01 385 92 64 7 692 234 92 21 [I 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 9 Year Comparison Action 11: Boys Club 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 BM BF NBM NBF 93-94 119 39 39 9 D 94-95 133 44 31 8 95-96 334 82 72 12 96-97 357 146 85 20 97-98 515 148 112 8 98-99 359 148 88 22 99-00 351 129 90 27 D 00-01 325 136 56 12 210 83 52 11 93-94 D 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 D 00-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 9 Year Comparison Action 12: Alt School Susp K-5 1600 - 1400 1200 - 1000 800- 600 400 - 200 ff u _..-,.. 0- rr ... .JMI BM BF NBM NBF 93-94 168 54 45 8 94-95 178 68 58 5 95-96 1563 492 510 71 96-97 154 30 32 3 97-98 0 0 0 0 98-99 211 106 27 6 99-00 246 63 75 16 00-01 162 55 40 21 01-02 342 164 67 29 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 0()-01 01-02 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 9 Year Comparison Action 17: Expulsion 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 BM BF NBM NBF 93-94 6 4 3 0 D 94-95 7 0 1 0 95-96 2 1 0 2 96-97 3 7 0 0 97-98 6 5 0 0 98-99 7 2 1 1 99-00 3 0 2 0 D 00-01 3 0 5 3 1 0 2 1 93-94 D 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 D 00-01 01-02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_934","title":"North Little Rock School District, 2001-2002 School Profile","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2001/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School employees","School enrollment","School attendance","School improvement programs","Student activities"],"dcterms_title":["North Little Rock School District, 2001-2002 School Profile"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/934"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["449 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nI , NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2001-2002 SCHOOL PROFILE School: Amboy Elementary School Grade: K- 5 Principal: Pam Wilcox Race/Gender: W/F Assistant Principal: Angela Clemmer Race/Gender: 8/F Secretary: Judy Barnett Race/Gender: W/F Secretary: Angie Ward Race/Gender: W/F * Staff Staff Changes SCHOOL,ROFILE Table of Contents * Staff Attendance (Certified) * Staff Attendance (Classified) * School Enrollment Elementary -Se.GeRdttry Special Programs Special Education Four Year Comparison * Class Enrollment (Elementary) * -ot1rse Emulfment (Secondary) Extended Educational Programs School/District lntitiated Honors and Awards Committee/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities .Ig1011t Information_ * Student Attendance (After Nine Weeks) Students Retained -5tlbject Area C911rses Failed (SeG9Rdery) GffldttatieR---lnf6f'fflcltion- -Bropout- Statisties (P, evi9t1~terjAchievement! Assessment Data Staff Development Update (Certified) Staff Development Update (Classified) * Discipline Information (After Nine Weeks) Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation (COE) Survey Results Att11ua\nS chool f.np1ove111euPt fan *INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED BY COMPUTER SERVICES Page 1 2 3 4 5 + 7 8 9 10 44- 12 13 14 15 -4fr 17 18 -~ -26- -2+- 22 23 24 25 26 'lT SCH~L: AMllOEYL EMENTSACRHYO OL FULL Tl ME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS 1 1 2 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 15 2 1 18 B.A. CLASSROOM TEACHER 1 1 SPEC EDUC TEACHERS 2 2 MEDIA SPECIALISTS 1 1 GIT FACILITATORS 1 1 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 1 COUNSELORS 1 1 READING RECOVERY 1 1 H.O.T.S. !TOTAL CERTIFIED 21 TEACHER AIDES 3 1 4 CAMPUS SUPERVISOR 1 CLERICAL STAFF 2 2 SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS 1 1 2 2 CAFETERIA WORKERS 2 2 2 2 COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES 2 4 6 CROSSING GUARDS 1 1 2 INTERVENTION AIDE PARENT COORDINATOR !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 1 scHIL: AMBOEYL EMENTS/\\CflHYO OL S,_F (CHANGES AFTER OCTOBER) FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SPEC EDUC TEACHERS MEDIA SPECIALISTS GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST COUNSELORS !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES CLERICAL STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS CAFETERIA WORKERS COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES 3 3 6 CROSSING GUARDS !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 2 CERTIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 3 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Certified Staff Absences PAGE Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male 3 23 1 Other - Female 1 Other - Male by Race and Sex School 31 AMBOY ELEMENTARY K-6 4.5 10.5 1. 5 7-8 9-10 3 11-12 Other CLASSIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 4 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15: 41: 45 Classified Staff Absences PAGE Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male 5 4 12 by Race and Sex School 31 AMBOY ELEMENTARY K-6 1.0 25.5 2.5 7-8 9-10 4 11-12 Other scHIL: AMllOEYL EMHJTi\\sRcY1 100L GRADE WHITE LEVEL M F # 1 1 BEHAVIORAL ADJ. % 13% 13% # 8 9 KINDERGARTEN % 17% 19% # 5 8 FIRST % 10% 16% # 9 8 SECOND % 17% 15% # 11 7 THIRD % 20% 13% # 11 9 FOURTH % 20% 16% # 15 8 FIFTH % 27% 15% TOTAL # 60 50 GRADES 1 - 5 % 19% 16% ELEM-TARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT TOTAL BLACK TOTAL WHITE M F BLACK 2 6 6 25% 75% 75% 17 16 14 30 36% 34% 30% 64% 13 15 22 37 26% 30% 44% 74% 17 22 13 35 33% 42% 25% 67% 18 20 16 36 33% 36% 29% 65% 20 22 12 34 36% 40% 22% 62% 23 13 18 31 42% 24% 33% 56% 110 114 95 209 34% 35% 30% 65% OTHER TOTAL M F OTHER TOTAL 0 8 0 47 0 50 0 52 1 1 55 2% 2% 1 1 55 2% 2% 1 1 55 2% 2% 3 0 3 322 1% 1% Page 5 TOTAL ENROLLMENT,SPECIAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: AM[lOEYL EMENTS/\\CRHYO OL 2001-20 02 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAMS M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # 2 0 2 9 1 10 12 EARLY SUCCESS % 17% 17% 75% 8% 83% # 2 3 5 9 6 15 20 READING RECOVERY % 10% 15% 25% 45% 30% 75% # 8 7 15 5 6 11 26 QUEST % 31% 27% 58% 19% 23% 42% # 3 0 3 8 6 14 1 1 18 SOAR TO SUCCESS % 17% 17% 44% 33% 78% 6% 6% # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 7 SPECIAL lucATION SCHOOL: MfifJOHYU :'if.Uff..~!:SYi! OOL PLACEMENT WHITE TOTAL BLACK M F WHITE M F RESOURCE ROOM # 1 2 PLACEMENT M.R. % 33% 67% RESOURCE ROOM # 3 1 4 2 3 PLACEMENT L.D. % 30% 10% 40% 20% 30% # SELF-CONTAINED % # 4 5 9 19 5 SPEECH % 12% 15% 26% 56% 15% TRANSITION - BA - # l 1 2 6 SELF-CONTAINED % 13% 13% 25% 75% # RESOURCE ROOM/MH % # 1 1 2 1 RESOURCE ROOM/OHi % 33% 33% 67% 33% # RESOURCE ROOM/504 % # RESOURCE ROOM/SEC % RESOURCE ROOM/ # 1 SPEECH IMPAIRED % PLACEMENT IS DETERMINED BY PRIMARY HANDICAPPING CONDITION There is a District Self-Contained Unit on this campus TOTAL BLACK 3 100% 5 50% 24 71% 6 75% 1 33% 1 100% OTHER M 1 10% 1 3% Yes No (Circle one) F 2001-2002 TOTAL OTHER TOTAL 3 1 10 10% 1 34 3% 8 3 1 Page 8 FOUR YEAR ENROL\"ENT COMPARISON OCTOBER 1 DAT A (USED TO DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE ENROLLMENT RANGES) STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS BLACK AND NON-BLACK INCLUDING KINDERGARTEN EXCLUDING KINDERGARTEN BLACK 209 BLACK 179 WHITE 110 WHITE 93 2001-2002 OTHER 3 2001-2002 OTHER 3 TOTAL 322 TOTAL 275 % BLACK 64.91% % BLACK 65.09% BLACK 230 BLACK 185 WHITE 120 WHITE 109 2000-2001 OTHER 7 2000-2001 OTHER 6 TOTAL 357 TOTAL 300 % BLACK 64.43% % BLACK 61.67% BLACK 231 BLACK 190 WHITE 146 WHITE 129 1999-2000 OTHER 3 1999-2000 OTHER 3 TOTAL 380 TOTAL 322 % BLACK 60.79% % BLACK 59.01% BLACK 218 BLACK 180 WHITE 175 WHITE 154 1998-1999 OTHER 3 1998-1999 OTHER 2 TOTAL 396 TOTAL 336 % BLACK 55.05% % BLACK 53.57% Page 9 sc,\u0026amp;L: AMBOYnr n1rnrnny SCHOOL CLASS EitlJLLMENT (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F LESLIE CLEMENT K 4 F w 2 3 5 6 CHRISTIE JONES K 6 F w 2 3 6 4 JONI WALKER K 7 F w 4 3 5 4 SANDRA DUNCAN 1 8 F w 2 2 4 8 KATHY MASCUILLI 1 2 F w 0 4 6 7 '' JOY PLOSZAY 1 3 F w 3 2 5 7 JILL LAWHON 2 33 F w 3 2 9 4 DEVONA WILEY 2 32 F B 3 3 6 5 I LAURA WILLIAMS 2 31 F w 3 3 7 4 ' TOTAL: 22 25 53 49 0 0 Page 10 SC-OL: liMIJOEYL EP:iENTS/CIRMYO OL CLASS E.OLLMENT (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F LYNN BURTON 3 35 F w 5 0 8 5 LYNDA GARCIA 3 37 F w 3 3 7 4 1 GINA GOPER 3 36 F w 3 4 5 7 RUBA ABDIN 4 19 F 0 3 3 7 5 1 SHERI HAMLIN 4 26 F w 4 2 7 5 CAROL MAYERHOFF 4 21 F w 4 4 8 2 f:1, . COURTNEY DICKENS 5 24 F w 5 2 5 5 1 :'::\"( DEANNA MANN 5 1 F w 4 3 4 7 ~. MARCIA SCOTT 5 25 F B 6 3 4 6 ~: ' NATALIE CASAVECHIA BA 5 F w 1 1 6 ' . :' TOTAL: 38 25 61 46 3 0 Page 10a \"ief: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 1 Jate: 10/15/0i AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time: 15: 53: 19 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot '1A. LLI 1 AR101 2 ART F w 5 6 6 17 :::)LOSZAY 1 AR101 3 ART F w 3 2 5 7 i7 DUNCAN 1 AR101 8 ART F l.J 3 2 4 8 i7 ARiOi ART 6 9 i5 2i 5i ,j!LLIAMS 1 AR201 31 ART F w 3 .-:.) ., 7 4 i7 ,jILEY i AR20i \"?J ART F B 4 ., ...,c.. c.. 6 5 i7 _AWHON i AR201 33 ART F w .\".j ., --, ~ 9 3 i7 AR20i ART iO 7 22 i2 5i 2ASAVECHIA 1 AR301 5 ART F w 1 2 .-:.) ., BURTON i AR30i 35 ART F w 5 9 5 i9 --lPER i AR30i 36 ART F l.J .\".\":\\, 4 4 7 i8 }ARCIA i AR30i 37 ART F w 3 3 6 5 i i8 AR30i ART 12 7 21 17 i 58 :::\nASAVECHI A 1 AR401 5 ART F w 1 3 ..., .. .\nBOIN 1 AR401 19 ART F A 3 3 7 5 1 19 1AYERHOFF 1 AR401 21 ART F l.J 4 4 8 2 18 --!AMLIN i AR401 26 ART F l.J 4 2 6 6 iB AR401 ART ii iO 24 13 1 59 3COTT i P,R50i i ART F B 4 '.j .., 5 7 i9 2ASAVECHIA i AR50i 5 ART F l.J 1 i ~~oi i AR50i 24 ART F B 5 2 5 5 i 18 ::iC i AR50i 25 ART F B 6 3 4 6 19 AR50i ART 15 8 i5 i8 i 57 DEPT TOTALS 54 41 97 81 'j ..., 276 :ASAVECHIA 1 ELt1 5 BA SELF CONT F w 1 1 6 8 ELM BA SELF CONT i i 6 8 DEPT TOTALS 1 1 6 8 1ASCUILLI 1 ENiOl 'c\"'.). ENGLISH F w 5 6 6 17 ::\nLOSZAY i ENiOi 3 ENGLISH F l-l 3 2 5 7 17 :JIJNCAl'J i EN101 8 HiGLISH F l.J 3 2 4 8 i7 EN101 ENGLISH 6 9 15 2i 51 ,JILLIAMS 1 EN201 31 ENGLISH F w 3 3 7 4 17 wILEY 1 EN201 ...,., ..:\u0026gt;c.. ENGLISH F B 4 2 5 5 16 _AWHON 1 EN201 33 ENGLISH F l.J 3 2 9 3 17 EN201 ENGLISH 10 7 21 12 50 :ASAVECHIA 1 EN301 5 ENGLISH F l.J 1 ..., 3 c\u0026lt;. 3URTON i EN301 35 ENGLISH F lJ 5 s 4 18 ---iOPER i EN30i 36 Ei'JGLI5H F w -.-.-.:\n, 4 3 7 i7 }ARCIA i EN30i 37 ENGLISH F l.J 3 3 5 5 1 17 EN30i ENGLISH i2 7 i9 16 1 55 :A-ECHIA 1 EN401 5 ENGLISH F l.J 1 3 4 i:\\BDIN i EN40i i9 ENGLISH F A i 3 7 4 15 Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 2 Date: 10/15/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time: 15:53:19 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M f M f M f Tot MA-HOFF 1 EN401 21 ENGLISH F w 4 3 7 2 16 HAMLIN 1 EN401 26 ENGLISH f w 4 1 6 5 1,:: . EN401 .C:t'l'-:iLJ.::\u0026gt;M 9 8 23 11 51 MANN 1 EN501 1 ENGLISH F w 2 2 -.:. 8 19 CASAVECHIA 1 EN501 5 ENGLISH F w 1 1 DICKENS 1 EN501 24 .C:l'l'-:iLJ.\n:ir, f w 5 C: 4 4 1 16 SCOTT 1 EN501 25 ENGLISH F B 7 4 3 4 18 EN501 ENGLISH 14 8 15 16 1 54 POWELL 1 EN701 71 ENGLISH RES F l,J 2 2 1 1 1 7 WINEBRENNER 1 EN701 72 ENGLISH RES F w 1 3 4 8 EN701 ENGLISH RES 3 2 4 5 1 15 DEPT TOTALS 54 41 97 81 3 -,- c../0 CLEMENT 1 GF, 4 GRADE F, F w .., ...., 3 4 6 16 JONES 1 GK 6 GRADE K F w ~, C. 3 6 4 15 WALKER 1 Gt, 7 GRADE K F w 2 3 7 4 16 G :, GRADE '\\ / 9 17 14 47 DEPT TOTALS / 9 17 14 47 MASCUILLI 1 Gl ., GRADE 01 F w 5 6 6 '-: C. ..... :=\u0026gt;L-AY 1 Gl 3 GRADE 01 f w ..'.I C: 5 7 17 DU. N 1 Gl 8 GRADE 01 f w 3 2 4 8 1 / Gl GRADE 01 6 9 15 ...,. C. J. 51 DEPT TOTALS 6 9 15 ..,, _1.. _ 51 ..JILLIAMS 1 G2 31 GRADE 02 F w 3 3 7 4 17 ...JILEY 1 G2 32 GRADE 02 F B 4 2 6 5 17 _AWHON 1 G2 33 GRADE 02 F w 3 2 9 3 17 G2 GRADE 02 10 7 22 12 51 DEPT TOTALS 10 7 .,..., c.c. 12 51 BURTON 1 G3 35 GRADE 03 F w 5 9 5 19 --iOPER 1 G3 36 GRADE 03 F w 3 4 4 7 18 '\nARCIA 1 G3 37 GRADE 03 F w 3 3 6 5 i 18 G3 GRADE 03 11 i 19 17 1 55 DEPT TOTALS 11 7 19 17 1 55 .\nBOIN 1 G4 19 GRADE 04 F A 3 3 / 5 1 19 \"'iAYERHOFF 1 G4 21 GRADE 04 F w 4 4 8 ., C. 18 --iAMLIN 1 G4 ...,, GRADE 04 F w 4 ~ 6 6 18 c.O C. G4 GRADE 04 11 9 21 13 1 55 DEPT TOTALS . ..1. .. 9 21 13 1 c...c. .,. .. '1A- 1 G5 1 GRADE 05 F w 4 3 5 7 19 JICKENS 1 G5 24 GRADE 05 F w 5 c.'. 5 5 1 i8 Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page, 3 Date: 10/15/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time: 15: 53:20 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot sA .1. . G5 25 GRADE 05 F B 6 3 4 6 19 G5 GRADE 05 15 8 14 18 1 56 DEPT TOTALS 15 8 14 18 1 C. .!.. ~\\,... MASCUILLI 1 HL101 ..., HEALTH F w C. 6 6 . -, c:.. .., .... PLOSZAY 1 HL101 ..., HEALTH F w ..., ..., ~ 2 5 7 .'-..,. DUNCAN 1 HL101 8 HEALTH F w 3 c'. 4 8 17 HUOi HEALTH 6 9 15 21 :, l. WILLIAMS i HI .-,~ ..., 1 HEALTH F w ..., ..., 1-c:..\\._l l ~i ~ ~ / 4 .!. . WILEY 1 HL201 ~c.: HEALTH F B 4 2 6 5 .J. / LAWHON i HL201 ~.~ HEALTH F w ..:\u0026lt; 2 9 3 17 HL201 HEALTH 10 7 ...,,...., c:..z=_ 12 51 CASAVECHIA 1 HL301 C. HEALTH F l,i 1 ,...., ~ z=_ 3 BURTON 1 HL301 35 HEALTH F 1,i 5 9 5 19 HOPER 1 HL301 ..:)C) HEALTH F l,J 3 4 4 7 18 ,\nARCIA 1 HL301 37 HEALTH F w 3 3 6 5 1 18 HL301 HEALTH 12 7 21 17 1 58 CASAVECHIA 1 HL401 5 HEALTH F l,J 1 3 4 ABDIN 1 HL401 19 HEALTH F A 3 3 7 5 i i9 MAYERHOFF 1 HL401 21 HEALTH F l,) 4 4 8 ~, z=_ 18 HA.IN 1 HL401 26 HEALTH F l,J 4 c'. 6 6 18 HL401 HEALTH 11 10 24 13 1 59 SCOTT 1 HL501 1 HEALTH F B 4 3 5 7 19 CASAVECHIA 1 HL501 5 HEALTH F w 1 1 SCOTT 1 HL501 24 HEALTH F B 5 ,...., c:.. 5 5 1 18 SCOTT 1 HL501 25 HEALTH F B C: 3 4 6 19 HL501 HEALTH 15 8 15 18 1 57 DEPT TOTALS 54 41 97 81 3 .-,- c:../Q MASCUILLI 1 HN101 ,,::._. .., HANDWRITING 'IC ' w 5 6 6 17 PLOSZAY 1 HN101 3 HANDWRITING F w ..:\u0026lt; 2 5 7 17 DUNCAN 1 HN101 8 HANDWRITING F l,j 3 2 4 8 17 HN101 HANDWRITING 6 9 15 21 51 WILLIAMS 1 HN201 31 HANDWRITING F w ~ 3 / 4 17 WILEY 1 HN201 32 HAl'WWIRT I NG F B 4 ~, 6 5 1\"7 ,::_ . ' LAWHON 1 HN201 33 HANDWRITING F t,J 3 r\n,::_ 9 3 1- I HN201 HANDWRITING 10 7 22 12 51 CASA\\.'ECHIA 1 HN301 5 HANDWRITING F w 1 ,...., c:.. 3 BURTOt'li 1 HN301 35 HANDWRITING F i,,i 5 9 5 19 HOPER 1 HN301 '-CCll ' HANDl-JIRT I NG F l,J 3 4 4 7 l !:j GARCIA 1 HN301 37 HAt,JDt,JIRT I NG F l,J 3 3 6 5 1 18 HN301 HANDWRITING 12 7 21 17 1 58 CA-ECHIA 1 HN401 5 HANDWRITING F w 1 3 4 ABDIN 1 HN401 19 HANDWRITING F A ..:\u0026lt; 3 7 5 1 19 Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 4 Date: 10/15/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time,: 15:53:20 Teacher -White- -Biack- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Ti tie Sex Race M F M F M F Tot MA-HOFF 1 HN401 21 HANDWRITING F l.J 4 4 8 2 i8 HAML..IN i HN40i 26 HANDl.JIRT I NG F l,i 4 2 6 6 i8 HN40i HANDl.JIRT I NG ii iO 24 i3 i 59 MANN 1 HN501 1 HANDWRITING F w 2 \".--, 7 8 19 CASAVECHIA i HN501 5 HANDWRITING F w i i DIC!Ji.ENS i HN50i 24 HANDWRITING F l.J 5 ., ,::. 4 5 i 17 SCOTT i HN50i 25 HANDl.JIRT I i'iG F B 8 4 3 5 20 HN501 HANDl.JIR T I NG i5 8 15 18 1 57 DEPT TOTAL..S C::,' -'+ 4i 97 81 3 276 MASCUILLI 1 MA101 2 MATH F l.J 5 6 6 17 PLOSZAY 1 MA101 '\"' MATH F l.J 3 2 ~- 7 i7 ~ DUNCAN 1 MA101 B MATH F l.J 3 , ,::. 4 B 17 MA101 MATH 6 9 15 21 51 WILLIAMS i MA201 31 MATH F l.J 3 .--, 7 4 \u0026lt; ..,. ~ L .' \\.JILEY i MA201 -::'\"? MATH F B 4 ., ....,.,_ 6 5 17 \"- LAWHON i MA201 33 MATH F l.J 3 ,::., 9 3 i7 MA201 MATH iO 7 .,., \u0026lt;:..a. 1., ,::. ~-i CASAVECHIA 1 MA301 5 MATH F w 1 ,.., c::.. 3 BURTON i MA30i 35 MATH F w 5 s 4 i8 ~?iR i MA30i 36 MATH F (.,j 3 4 3 7 i7 i MA30i 37 MATH F (.,j ., ., G A ...., ..., 5 5 i i7 MA30i MATH i2 7 19 16 i 55 CASAVECHIA 1 MA401 5 MATH F w . L 3 4 ABDIN i MA40i i9 MATH F A 1 3 7 4 1 16 MAYERH OFF 1 MA40i 21 MATH F l.J '+., 3 8 2 17 HAMLii'i i MA40i 26 MATH F l.J 4 2 6 5 i7 MA401 MATH 9 9 24 ii 1 54 MANN 1 MA501 1 MATH F l.J 4 3 5 7 19 ,:\nASAVECHIA 1 MA501 5 MATH F l.J 1 1 MANN 1 MA501 24 MATH F w 5 .,:.:.:., 5 4 1 17 MANN 1 MA501 25 MATH F l.J 5 3 4 5 17 MA501 MATH 14 8 15 16 1 54 POWELL 1 MA701 71 MATH RES F l.J 1 i 2 2 6 WINEBRENNER 1 MA701 72 MATH RES F w '.\":\\ ::. ~'\"\\ 5 MA70i MATH RES 3 i 2 5 11 DEPT TOTALS 54 4i 97 81 3 276 MASCUILLI i MUiOi 2 MUSIC F w 5 6 6 i7 ?LOSZAY i MUiOi 3 MUSIC F l.J 3 ., ,::. 5 7 i7 DUNCAN 1 MU10i 8 MUSIC F l.J 3 ., 4 8 i7 \u0026lt;=.. MU101 t1USIC 6 9 15 21 51 WI-AMS 1 MU201 31 MUSIC F l.J 3 ,., ...., 7 4 17 WILEY i MU20i .J..\u0026gt;,. _ MUSIC F B 4 .-, 6 5 i7 ,::. Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 5 Date: 10/15/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time: 15: 53:21 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M 'F Tot LA-N 1 MU201 33 MUSIC F w 3 ...., 9 3 17 C. MU201 MUSIC 1 ,:\n7 22 . ...., .1 C. 51 CASAVECHIA 1 MU301 5 MUSIC F w 1 2 3 BURTON 1 MU301 35 MUSIC F w 5 9 5 19 HOPER 1 MU301 36 MUSIC F l,J 3 4 4 7 18 GARCIA 1 MU301 37 MUSIC F w ,_:I 3 6 5 1 18 MU301 MUSIC 12 7 21 17 1 58 CASAVECHIA 1 MU401 ca MUSIC F w 1 'j 4 ,J - ABDit'I! 1 MU401 19 MUSIC F A 3 3 7 5 1 19 MAYERH OFF 1 MU401 c... .l .,. MUSIC F t,\n4 4 8 C~. , 18 HAMLit-.1 1 MU401 26 MUSIC F w 4 ~. C. 6 6 i8 MU401 MUSIC 11 10 24 13 1 59 DICKENS 1 MU501 1 MUSIC F w 4 3 5 7 19 CASAVECHIA 1 MU501 5 MUSIC F w 1 1 DICKENS 1 MU501 24 MUSIC F w 5 ...., 5 5 1 18 C. DICKENS 1 MU501 25 MUSIC F w 6 3 4 6 19 i1U501 MUSIC 15 8 15 18 1 ~r/ DEPT TOTALS 54 41 q-:- . I 81 3 C:./b MASCUILLI 1 PE101 ...., PHYS ED F w 5 6 6 17 C. P~,AY 1 PE101 3 PHYS ED F w 3 ~, 5 -:- 17 C. I D N 1 PE101 8 PHYS ED F l,J 3 2 4 8 1-:- I PE101 PHYS ED 6 9 15 21 51 WILLIAMS 1 PE201 31 PHYS ED F w 3 3 7 4 17 WILEY 1 PE201 32 PHYS ED F B 4 ~. 6 5 17 C. LAWHON 1 PE201 33 PHYS ED F w 3 ~, C. 9 3 17 PE201 PHYS ED 10 7 22 12 51 CASAVECHIA 1 PE301 ca PHYS ED F w 1 .., 3 ,J C. BURTON 1 PE301 35 PHYS ED F w 5 9 5 19 HOPER 1 PE301 36 PHYS ED F l,J 3 4 4 7 18 GARCIA 1 PE301 37 PHYS ED F w ,_:I 3 6 5 1 18 PE301 PHYS ED 12 7 21 17 1 58 CASAVECHIA 1 PE401 5 PHYS ED F t,J 1 3 4 ~ ABDIN 1 PE401 19 PHYS ED F A 3 3 7 5 1 19 MAYERH OFF 1 PE401 21 PHYS ED F w 4 4 8 2 18 HAMLir\\J 1 PE401 ...,. c.O PHYS ED F w 4 2 6 6 18 PE401 PHYS ED 11 10 24 13 1 59 MANN 1 PE501 1 PHYS ED F w 4 3 5 7 19 CASAt.,iECHIA 1 PE501 c~a P HYS ED F w 1 1 MANN 1 PE501 24 PHYS ED F w 5 2 5 5 1 18 MANN 1 PE501 25 PHYS ED F w 6 3 4 6 19 PE501 PHYS ED 15 8 15 18 1 57 - DEPT TOTALS 54 41- ~ 9-:- . J 81 3 276 Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Date: 10/15i01 Time: 15:53:21 Teacher Name AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MA-ILL! PLOSZAY DUNCAN WILLIAMS WILEY LAWHON CASAVECHIA BURTON HOPER GARCIA CASAVECHIA ABDit'll !'lf'ITJ:.t'(MUr- r- HAMLIN MANN CASAVECHIA ~~--NS POWELL WINEBRENNER CourseSec Course Title 1 RE101 1 RE101 1 RE101 RE101 2 READING 3 READING 8 READING READING 1 RE201 31 READING 1 RE201 32 READING 1 RE201 33 READING RE201 READING 1 RE301 5 READING 1 RE301 35 READING 1 RE301 36 READING 1 RE301 37 READING RE301 READING 1 RE401 5 READING 1 RE401 19 READING 1 RE401 21 READING 1 RE401 26 READING RE401 READING 1 RE501 1 READING 1 RE501 5 READING 1 RE501 24 READING 1 RE501 25 READING RE501 READING 1 RE701 71 READING RES 1 RE701 72 READING RES RE701 READING RES DEPT TOTALS CASAVECHIA BURTON HOPER GARCIA C.ASAVECHIA ABDIN !'lf'IY'ct'(MUr- r- HAMLIN SCOTT CASAVECHIA SCOTT SCOTT 1 SC301 1 SC301 1 SC301 1 SC301 SC301 1 SC401 1 SC401 1 SC401 1 SC401 SC401 1 SC501 1 SC501 1 SC501 1 SC501 SC501 DEPT TOTALS 5 SCIENCE 35 SCIENCE 36 SCIB'IJCE 37 SCIENCE SCIENCE 5 SCIENCE 19 SCIENCE 21 SCIENCE 26 SCIENCE SCIENCE 1 SCI.ENC-E 5 SCIENCE 24 SCIENCE c:\n:, SCIENCE SCIENCE Teacher Sex Race F W F W F W F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F w B w w w w l,i 1,J A w w w w w B w w w w w w w A w w B w B B -WhiteM F 5 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 10 1 5 ._j ._j 12 1 4 4 9 .., \"'- 5 14 2 3 3 -, \"'- 2 7 4 3 7 3 3 1 8 .., \"'- .., \"'- 4 8 1 1 2 54 41 1 5 ._j 3 12 3 4 4 11 4 5 6 15 4 3 7 3 4 10 3 2 3 8 38 25 -BlackM F 6 6 5 7 4 8 15 21 7 4 9 4 5 3 20 12 2 9 4 3 7 5 5 19 16 3 7 4 7 c.'. 6 5 23 11 7 8 1 4 4 3 4 15 16 2 4 3 1 5 5 97 81 2 9 4 6 21 3 7 8 6 24 5 4 15 5 7 5 17 5 2 6 13 7 5 6 18 60 48 Page 6 -Other- M F Tot 1 1 1 1 .1. . 1 3 1 1 1 l 1 3 .,. .. .., .' 17 17 =~=..- . 17 15 17 49 3 i8 17 17 55 4 15 16 16 51 .'C.,. .' 1 16 18 54 9 16 276 3 19 18 18 58 4 19 18 18 59 19 1 18 19 57 174 Ref: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 7 Date: 10/15/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Time: 15:53:21 Teacher -White- -Blacl:- -Other- Teacher Name CoLrseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot MA-ILLI 1 SP101 ...., SPELLING F w 5 6 6 17 ~ \"'- PLOSZAY 1 SP 1 ()1 3 SPELLING F w 3 c:: 5 7 17 DUNCAN 1 SP101 8 SPELLING F w ..\nI 2 4 8 17 SP101 SPELLING 6 9 15 21 51 WILLIAMS 1 SP201 31 SPELLING F w 3 3 ...,. I 4 17 WILEY 1 SP201 32 SPELLING F B 4 2 5 5 16 LAWHON 1 SP201 33 ::Jt\"'~LL l l'l\\i F w 3 2 9 ..\nI 17 SP201 SPELLING 10 7 21 12 50 CASAVECHIA 1 SP301 5 SPELLING F w 1 2 3 BURTON 1 SP301 35 SPELLING F w 5 9 4 18 :-iOPER 1 SP301 36 SPELLING F w 3 4 3 7 17 GARCIA 1 SP301 37 SPELLING F w 3 3 5 5 1 17 SP301 SPELLING 12 7 19 16 1 55 CASAVECHIA 1 SP401 5 SPELLING F w 1 3 4 ABDIN 1 SP401 19 SPELLING F A 1 3 7 4 15 MAYERH OFF 1 SP401 21 SPELL It-JG F i,i 4 3 7 \"~'-, 16 riAMLIN 1 SP401 26 SPELLING F w 4 1 6 5 16 SP401 SPELLING 9 8 23 i 1 ~. :, ! :'iMJN 1 SP501 1 SPELLING F w \".'.-.., 2 7 8 19 CASAVECHIA 1 SP501 5 SPELLING F w 1 1 ~~-NS 1 SP501 24 SPELLING F w 5 2 4 4 1 16 ::,\\., 1 SP501 25 SPELLING F B 7 4 3 4 15 SP501 SPELLING 14 8 15 16 1 \"' . --4 POWELL 1 SP701 71 SPELLING RES F w \".'.-.., \".'.-.., 1 1 1 7 wINEI3RENNER 1 SP701 72 SPELLING RES F w 1 3 4 8 SP701 SPELLING RES 3 ..., \"'- 4 5 1 15 DEPT TOTALS 54 41 97 81 3 276 CASAVECHIA 1 SS301 5 soc STUDIES F w 1 ..., \"'- 3 BURTON 1 SS301 35 soc STUDIES F w 5 9 5 19 riOPER 1 SS301 36 soc STUDIES F w ..\nI 4 4 7 18 GARCIA 1 SS301 37 soc STUDIES 'F w 3 3 6 5 1 18 SS301 soc STUDIES 12 7 21 17 1 58 CASAVECHIA 1 SS401 5 soc STUDIES F w 1 3 4 ABDIN 1 SS401 19 soc STUDIES F A 3 3 7 5 1 19 MAYERH OFF 1 SS401 21 soc STUDIES F w 4 4 8 2 18 HAMLIN 1 SS401 ...,, c.O soc STUDIES F w 4 ~, C. 6 6 18 SS401 soc STUDIES 11 10 ....., .,_-4 13 1 59 DICKENS 1 SS501 1 soc STUDIES F w 4 3 5 7 19 CASAVECHIA 1 SS501 5 soc STUDIES F w 1 1 DICKENS 1 SS501 24 soc STUDIES F w 5 ~, c:.. 5 5 1 18 DICKENS 1 SS501 25 soc STUDIES F w 6 3 4 6 19 - SS501 soc STUDIES 15 8 15 18 1 57 DEPT TOTALS 38 25 60 48 .,.:.) , 174 SCHOOL TOTALS 623 469 1107 920 36 3155 SCHOi: AMBOEYL EMENTASRCYH OOL EXTENDED EDUCiONAL PROGRAMS 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAM MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL GOVERNOR'S # SCHOOL % # BOY'S STATE % # GIRL'S STATE % # SUMMER SCHOOL % PRE- # KINDERGARTEN % # KINDERGARTEN % # 5 3 8 5 8 13 21 FIRST % 24% 14% 38% 24% 38% 62% 1 # SECOND % # THIRD % # FOURTH % # FIFTH % # SIXTH % GRADES SEVEN # AND EIGHT % GRADES NINE # THRU TWELVE % QUEST # 2 4 6 I 1 7 SUMMER SCHOOL % 29% 57% 86% 14% 14% 1 Page 12 scHA: l\\rADOEYl[M HJT/\\nYS CHOOL HONORS. AWARDS I List all honors and awards - - - - - be s11ecific I HONORS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 16 I? 28 15 ?3 38 66 REGUL/\\R HONOR ROLL % 24% 18% 42% 23% 35% 58% # R I? 20 7 I~ 22 42 PRINCIPAL'$ IIONOR ROLL % 19% 29% 48% 17% 36% 52% # 25 23 48 39 35 74 122 PERFECT ATTENDANCE % 0.20 19% 39% 32% 29% 61% # 24 36 60 27 55 82 142 BEHAVIOR B/\\SII % 17% 25% 42% 19% 39% 58% # ? 2 2 FLAG MONITORS % 100% 100% # I 2 3 2 I 3 6 FIRE MARSHALL$ % 17% 33% 50% 33% 17% 50% Page 13 SCH!,L: COMMITTEES/PA,NT INVOLVEMENT 2oofioo2 /\\MUOFY.L EMENTSACfllYiO OL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/ PATRONS 0 F F I C E R S WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER TL WHITE BLACK OTHER TL COMMITTEE M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F EQUITY # 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 COMMITTEE % 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% PARENT TEACHER # 1 29 1 4 1 32 65 38 9 2 1 183 4 1 5 ASSOCIATION % 1% 16% 1% 2% 1% 17% 36% 21% 5% 1% 1% 0.80 0.20 # 64 135 11 46 1 4 261 VOLUNTEERS % 25% 52% 4% 18% 0% 2% # 1 28 1 4 1 35 AMBOY BOOS I ERS % 3% 80% 3% 11% 3% # 3 2 5 QUEST CASE S IUDY % 60% 40% # 3 2 5 COMMUNICA 11011S % 60% 40% # 1 28 1 4 1 35 SUNSHINE % 3% 80% 3% 11% 3% # 1 3 1 5 COUNSELOR'S % 20% 60% 20% # % # % # % # % Page 14 SCH.L: i'IMllOHYE MEN111Si1CYI IOOL EXTRACURRl~AR ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY MEMBERSHIP SPONSORS OR WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL CLUB M F M F M F M F M F M F # 7 7 ~ 6 24 I 1 BIG BflOTIIERS/BIG SISTER % 29% 29% 17% 25% 100% # 2 2 1 1 PICI\\LE/CI\\NOY MON 11 ORS % 100% 100% # 2 1 2 5 1 1 BOOI\\STORE MONITORS % 40% 20% 40% 100% # 1 2 4 7 1 1 MEDIii CENTER MONITORS % 14% 29% 57% 100% # 1 3 2 6 1 1 CUSlODIIIN'S HELPERS % 17% 50% 33% 100% # 9 7 3 5 24 1 1 1\\1\\MBOY TV STI\\FF % 38% 29% 13% 21% 100% # 3 4 1 8 I 1 2 BIRl HDIIY /FUN DRIii SERS % 38% 50% 13% 50% 50% # 1 3 2 8 14 1 1 TEIICHER'S HELPERS % 7% 21% 14% 57% 100% # 3 2 2 7 1 1 CONrLICT MANAGERS % 43% 29% 29% 100% # 2 2 4 1 1 HIILL MONITORS % 50% 50% 100% # % # % # % Page 15 2001-2002 STUDENT ATTENDANCE AFTER NINE-WEEKS (ATTACH COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 17 scHftL: AMBOEYL EMENl/\\iSiYC HOOt STUDENTAETAINED 200~002 i WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # KINDERGARTEN % # 1 1 1 FIRST % 100% 100% # SECOND % # THIRD % # FOURTH % # FIFTH % # SIXTH % # SEVENTH % # EIGHT % # NINTH % # TENTH % # ELEVEN % # TWELFTH % Page 18 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT-ASSESSMENT DATA SAT-9 (PLEASE ATTACH MOST RECENT INFORMATION) Page 22 S1i1Nl'OR/J ,IC/1/El'EMENT TESTSl'.RIES, NIN1'll /)/1'/UN I EAl'IIER: *' * * \"' * * * (iRADE: 01 S('ll001: AI\\IBOV El.l~MF:NTAH\\' 'IFSTIJA'IF: 04/16/01 l)lS.IHIC'.I: NOHTII I.ITI LE IHJCI\u0026lt; - Sl'IUN(\n2001 HIIN IM\"IE: 05/08/01 (\nft()\\11' \\VIII'! E HEAIHNC I\\IATIIEl\\1ATH'S LANC:lJA\u0026lt;\nF. 'IUTAI. ~UI\\IBF:H 'I F:STEU 21 Tolal I Wonl Lwo,d l l!rad Tolall'rnhj ~l:ilh ---- Hcatl __ Study_ Read..... Cump .l\\lalh olvc J1ruc_ N11111hIc'r,, ssihlc IO(i J(i ]{) 40 69 44 25 Number I stet! 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Natirnml 11 lividtrnl PR-S orMr.11N1 l'E 45-5 )6-4 49-5 52-5 JJ-4 JR-4 28-4 National l'R S11111111:uy fW - 99 N I) II 60 - 79 N 4 4 40 - 59 N 6 J 20 .I~ N 6 R 0/ - If N 5 80 - 9, \",, 14 10 14 14 0 5 0 60. n \"f, 24 19 24 29 19 24 19 40 - H 1r, 14 14 I\u0026lt;) 24 29 JJ 14 20 - 3! \"f, 29 24 JR 19 29 10 38 Of - H' \"i'i 19 1J 14 14 24 29 29 l'crcenl At -\\bovc the National 5 th PR 4) .18 4R 4R )8 52 19 National N 'E Stati,\ntics Afcm1 47 2 42 5 49.5 SI.I 40 8 43.5 38 U Stfllulm rl .'Je1i\u0026lt;itio11 15.7 17.8 16.7 14.8 16.4 19 I 14.2 Perre11til\u0026lt;~ 1'90 - 901l1 69 4 65.0 (,9? 68 7 59 J 619 57 8 QJ - 15th 58 9 56 8 58.7 63.2 53.3 57.2 4) 9 Me,l11111 - 5011, 44.U )8 0 4).) 48.5 41.4 48.3 )6.) QI - 15th 31.2 28 0 )7.1 35.8 30.2 25.3 22.I l'/0 - /0th 26.0 16.2 27.2 31.1 13.2 9.3 17.7 STANfOklJ 1.EVF.1/fOR~l/lJATTERY: Plll~IARY I/ S / full 1.,nglh NORMS: ~11rin~ 199S National Normc\nLan~ [ __ l 44 21 39-4 10 24 19 10 JR 48 44.4 17.7 66 J 56 0 42.9 27.6 21.4 Spell -- JO 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 I) IOU 10 .u I.I) I.U I.U 1.0 IU .-.. AIJMINISTRATOR'S DATA SUMMARY FOR MlllOY ELE~IENTAl!Y F.NVIIH)N/\\IF.NT, S('IENCE, SO\u0026lt;:rl.S{'lr('F, l'ae.c_L_ HATTl~lt\\' TO'rl.S Rrrort trnrntrd h) RF:AOY RF:POR IS'\"' \\'u1lon 7.l.U for N11rlh I.IU!r Rotl, $,.hnnl Olt!drl S1ANFORIJ ACll/fil fiMfiN1\" ?EST SERIES, N/Nrll EIJl7WN ll'AC'IIFR ..................... tillAl\u0026gt;E: 01 O..:('IIO\u0026lt;JI AI\\IBO\\' F:LEI\\U.:N I Alt\\' IFSI IJAII': 04/16101 lllS IHI(. I: NIJHTII I.JTI l,E HO(\"K - Sl'HIN\u0026lt;.\nZOOI RIIN IJATI': 05/08/111 lill()lJI': Ill.ACK --------- -- l!F.AlllN(\n~IA\"l 111\".~IATIC:S IO l'AL Nl:l\\lfffR 'I F:5'I Ell .14 '1'111:11I W nnllWordj Hracl TnlJ l'rnll~lall, ----- Rc:11.J Study Rcatl Cnm11 __AJa_tJ _Solv ~me_ Numhc, Pos,\nihlc ]()6 .16 JO 40 69 44 25 Number 1 cscd 14 J4 J4 34 34 34 34 I-Jatiom1lIm hvitlual l'R-S orMca,1 NCE JR 4 _U-4 40-5 42-5 21-3 2.1-4 22-3 Nation:,! PR Summary RO . 99 N 2 I 2 (,(} - 79 N 6 4 6 3 2 40 59 N 9 5 IU 5 5 6 20 39 N 7 13 7 7 10 10 (}/ 19 N 10 10 R IR 15 15 80 . 99 \"fi 6 6 'I 9 (,(/ . 79 % IR 12 2(, IR 9 6 6 40 59 1% 26 IS IR 29 15 15 IR 20 - 39 % 21 JR 2(, 21 21 2'l 2') 01 19 % 29 2'1 21 24 5) 44 44 l'e1cc11At l/A 1ovct he Nalit111a5l0 11P R J5 26 50 JR 18 24 12 N:ilillmll Nl' ~ Stalislics ~fem, 4) 4 40 R 4\"8 46.0 33.1 )4.4 ])7 Stn11dmd f).1in1io11 16 4 15 I 17R 16.2 16.6 IR 4 15 0 l'e, rrnrilf'f /'90 - 90rh 6.16 61 5 Ml 663 55 5 56 8 51.2 Q3 - 75rlt 5) 8 4t).4 SR 0 560 43.8 45.5 42 6 Aft,dim, -50//, 4] 9 JS 6 46 I 44.2 30.4 J0.0 30.7 QI - 25rh 29 5 30.2 32 I 32.2 18.9 20.5 20.7 PIO - 10th 22.9 23.0 15 2 24.1 12.9 12.9 1).7 , l'ANFORO LF.VF.L/FORl\\1/0ATTF,RY: PRll\\1/\\HY I/SI Full Lenglh ~ORI\\IS: Sp,.lng 1995 Nalional Normc\nLAN(\nJl,\\(\n1\\ _Lang_LI 44 J4 31-4 II 12 6 IS 12 ]2 35 29 39.4 15.7 59.7 49.8 36.2 23.2 19.2 Spell JO 84-7 (I (I () 0 100 0 0 0 1) 100 70.9 .0 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 .. C~U~IINISTRATUR'S UATA SU~l~I= FOR A~IBOY ELHIF,NTAl!Y ENVIRONMENT, SUENC-F., SO(rl. S('llr(\"F, PaPc I llATl\"El!Y -ror1,s Rrrnrl irnnllrtl h) RF:i\\llY RF:rORlS'., \\'rr,lnn 7.l ll for l'forlh l.llllr R11dt S\u0026lt;\"hnol lJl\u0026lt;hle! S1ANNJRIJ ACIIIEl'liMNT7ESTSR1S, NINT/1 017'/0N 11,AClll'.R, ,. ........... *** GRADE, 02 S('IIOOI., A/\\IBOY F:LF:/\\1ENTARY TFSI' DATE, 04116101 ll1S1 Rll'T: NOHTII Lrn I.F: ROCK-SPHING 2001 RUN UA\"IE, 05108/01 tiROIJI' WlllrF: IU~AUIN{\nl\\1ATIIRl\\1ATICS 1.ANGUA\u0026lt;\nJ\nIOTA!. NI 'I\\IIJElt 1 ES n:u 15 _LL Tni,11Wnrtllll,,.I l lleo\u0026lt;I Tn1nl I rrn1, ~lalh ncatl Stut.1, Vncah _ ComfL ~JatlL -5ulv. ':nc__ N11111hl\\c1rs sihlc I 18 48 JO 41) 74 Numhcr I cstcd 14 14 14 14 13 National lrnlivithrnl l'll-S of Mean Nl'E 68-6 68-6 60-6 73-6 80-7 Nalional I'll S11111111\n11y 80 - 99 N 6 60 - 79 N 40 - 59 N 20 - .19 N (}/ - 19 N (I () 80 - 99 o:\n43 43 2') 36 60 - 79 % 14 14 29 21 40 - 59 % 21 7 21 29 10 .19 % 7 J(, 7 14 0/ - /9 % 14 I) 14 l'crccnt At/AiJove the ',Jntionnl 50(1: PR (,4 64 64 57 .Ja1ionaNl CE Slatistics Afcn11 59.9 60 0 55 2 62.7 Stnmfm d IJ Tiario11 20.6 21.4 22.J 21.7 l'erre111ifcs 1'90 - 90/1, 84.5 87.5 78 9 9).9 ()3 - 15th 75.5 71.1 71.4 77.4 Medim, -50111 55.7 57.4 57.4 53.0 QI - 25th 43.6 )7 8 4),J 46.4 l'/0 - /Vtl, 27.6 32.6 8.7 ]J.4 l'ANFORU LEVEI/FURM/BATTF,RY, l'Rl~IARY 2 / S/ Full 1.englh URMS: Spring 1995 National Norms 7 2 J 0 54 15 23 (J 8 85 67.5 20.3 9).4 83.3 62.5 50.9 34.4 4(, 2R 14 13 71-6 86-7 8 3 I () I 4) 62 7 2) J(, R 14 () 0 8 57 85 61.8 725 20.0 21.8 82.3 96.2 75.5 89.4 51.4 67.9 45.5 57.8 36.I J 1.5 .-... AU~IINISTRATOR'S UATA SUMMARY FOR MlllOY ELEMENTARY l'aoe I ENVIHUNI\\IENT, UATTF:RY SCIENCE, TO'rl.S ___ i~C11N('E 1----1--- ----1---1~--1 Rrrirl -,:,nn1trd hy RF:ADV Rf.PORlS'\"' Vnslon 7.1.lJ for N\u0026lt;\u0026gt;rlh 1,llllt Rnck School Dl1hlfl .HANFORD ACll/1 '1:JIIENr TESr SERIES, NIN1\"ll E/JIHON I E/\\CIIER: **\"'**\"'*\"'*-,..*\"'**\"..., \u0026lt;\n('11001., MIIJUY F.LE~IF.NTAII\\' IJIS I Rll'I, NOlrl'II I.ITl'I.E RUC'I( -SPRING 2001 liROUI' Bl.ACK HEAIJINC: t\nRAIJE, 02 'I I'S I' DATE, 04/16/01 RUN DA IE, 05/08/01 '1ATIIF,~!ATICS 1.ANGll/\\GF. I \u0026lt;HAI. NU~IIJEH TES'I EIJ 40 Tutalj Word lHrad lltrad TotaJ l'roh 1 ~lath I L --------t ncatl --5luU)' __ Yncab C.:1111111-.IJJall _Suh~rnc__ _Lang ___ _ N11111bcPrm\ns,hlc I I 8 48 30 411 74 Number I cslcd 35 ]9 ]5 41) 40 J:11ional lmli, iilual 'll-S of Mean NCI: Jl-4 .12-4 27-4 J.1-4 .10-4 Jation.il l'R Sm11111:1ry 80 - 99 N 2 I 0 J 60 . 79 N 5 7 .l 6 40 - 59 N 6 5 12 2 20 - 39 N II 14 10 16 (// - 19 N II 12 10 1.1 so - 99 % 6 J 8 60 - 79 % 14 18 9 15 40 - 59 % 17 1.1 34 5 20 - 39 % JI 36 29 40 0/ - 19 % JI JI 29 ]] 'crcc111/\\ 1//\\bove the la1innal 50th PR 2] 28 26 2] la!ional N( 'E Stalislics \\/('(Ill .19 8 40.I 31.3 40.7 \\'trmdm d IJc1iatirm l'U 15.2 15.7 l(iJ /'crcc11tile.~ 1'90 - 90th 62.5 59 9 54.2 64.U ()3 - 751!, 48.7 50.6 49.I 46.0 Medi\"\" - 50th ]6.8 35.8 36 8 36 2 rJI - Z5rl, 29.9 28.5 27.2 28.1 /'/0 - JO//, 19 4 21.5 II.I 24.4 I ANFUHIJ LF.VEI./FOR~IIBA\"ITF.RY, PRl'1ARY 2 / S / Full Length ORl\\1S: Spring 1995 National Norms 16 IJ 20 20 40 JU 38 8 19.4 60.8 50 4 36.9 21.2 16 4 46 28 44 40 41) J9 27-4 40-5 29-4 2 4 J 4 9 5 6 7 8 12 9 J 16 II 20 5 IU 8 10 2] 13 15 18 21 JU 23 8 40 28 51 25 35 ]3 ]7 U 44 6 38.1 17 6 21.9 18 9 62.I 64 6 64 6 49.] 55.9 52.7 36.9 43.4 JI I 21.2 28.2 21.6 14.4 17.8 14 J AU~IINISTIUTOll'S UATA SU~IMARY FUR A~IBU\\' EI.E~IENTARY l'al!c I ENVIRONI\\IF.NT, IJATl'F.R\\' SCIENCE, TO-ll\"ALS - --t--S-U_Crl. SClrCli: --- --- ----1---~----1 ......SpclL 30 26 45-.1 6 .1 II 3 12 2] 12 42 12 46 47.3 15.0 66.7 58 2 41.(, 34.7 27.7 RtJHlrl J:frlfnltrl hr REi\\llV RF:ron IS'\"' \\'u~lon 7.2.23 for North Ulllt Rock Sehool U1,1rltl S1ANFORIJ ACIIIF:J'/IMENT 1ESTSF:RIES, NINT/1 l)lrl0N I FA\u0026lt;'f/Fll .................... \u0026lt;.iRAl\u0026gt;F OJ '('11001 /\\l\\1HUY F:I.F.1\\11\u0026lt;:NTAHY I FSI I\u0026gt;/\\ IF 04/16101 lllSIIUl'I- NOR'l 11 1.llTI.F. ll()('K - Sl'IIING 2001 llllN l\u0026gt;AIE, 05108/01 ljfl()lJ!' Wlllrl~ -- --- ---- REAl\u0026gt;ING ~li\\'111 EM/\\TICS 1.AN{\ntlA(\nF, 10 l'AI. NlJMUF,H 'IF.SI F.I\u0026gt; 17 1 .. ,,1J lllra,lj Reatl Total ------- Rcatl Yocah Comp _M_ alit I '../urnhclr' nss,blc 84 JO 54 7(, '\\J11111h1cc rs ltd 17 17 17 17 lational lntlh idua\\ 'R-S ofMc:m NCE 47.5 52-5 45.5 45.5 J\nitional PR S11111111ary 80 - 99 N 2 2 2 4 60 79 N 5 5 5 3 40 - 59 N 2 4 2 2 20 .l9 N 5 4 5 4 Of 19 N J 2 3 4 ,'W - 99 % 12 12 12 24 60 - 79 \"f, 29 29 29 18 40 59 \"f. 12 24 12 12 10 - ]9 \"f, 29 24 29 24 Of 19 % 18 12 18 24 'l'1r.:cnl At/Ahovc the la1in11a5l 01h l'R 47 65 47 41 latiunal NCL Slatislics \\fen11 48 2 51 0 47 6 47.5 'irmulanl /Je1intio11 17.9 16.9 17.8 23.1 l'ene111iles 1'90 - 90th 67.3 67.3 67.7 76 6 QJ - 75th 62 0 59.8 59 4 65 4 Median - 50th 46 6 53 8 45 2 44 7 QI - 151!1 34 5 34 5 35.7 23 5 l'/0 - 10th 21 2 24 7 20.3 15.3 I ANFOllU LF.VF:IJFOlt!\\1/DATrF.ltY: PIU!\\IAR\\' 3 /SI Full 1.~nglh ORMS: S1ring 1995 National Norms Lang l'rolj l\\blh I I Sulv l'roc 46 JI) 48 17 17 17 54.5 37.4 44.5 4 4 2 6 2 2 2 3 4 I I 6 4 7 J 24 24 12 35 12 12 12 18 24 6 6 35 24 41 18 65 41 41 52.0 42 8 46.7 209 25.7 13 8 75.7 75 0 618 65.8 60 8 54 I 543 40 0 43.6 28.3 16 7 34 5 I8.0 78 30 9 - S1u~II Jo 17 38-4 I 4 4 4 4 \u0026lt;, 24 24 24 24 41 43 5 17 I 63 2 564 41 6 28 6 16 3 - --- ---- i\\ll~IINISI lti\\'I OR'S l\u0026gt;i\\Ti\\ SUM~li\\RY 1:oR MlllOY ELF.MF.N l'i\\RY F.NVIH.ONl\\rnrfl. S(H\nNCE, SO]' A. I, SCIE[NCE Sri- Soc tJIC(' Scie_ 411 41) 17 17 44.5 48-S 2 2 2 (, 5 I 5 4 J 4 12 12 12 15 ]\u0026lt;) r, 2'1 24 18 21 :'U 11 46 9 49 o 18 2 17.7 (,7 6 68) 52 7 61 7 44.3 48.2 ]73 3] 2 18 I 20 6 - ____!3.g~ 111\\TI ERY TOTALS l,i1,f. U~ing 1 hnkg lla~i 1 c I C~mpl cning lnr1L Ski, Ja au 110 47 191 278 358 17 17 17 17 17 49.1 48-S 44.5 45.5 46-5 2 3 2 2 2 5 1 5 J J 4 J 2 5 5 ,2, 5 4 3 J ) 4 4 4 12 18 12 12 12 2\u0026lt;) 18 29 18 18 24 18 12 29 29 12 29 24 18 IR 24 18 24 24 24 q 47 51 59 51 49 6 49 I 4(, R 47.6 47 7 17.5 18 I 20 6 16.2 16 2 691 71 2 67 4 67 6 66 I 59 I 57 9 5'16 56 5 56 4 49 4 45.5 48 7 51 4 50.9 32.1) 3(, 6 23 5 30 5 30 2 21 5 2] 7 17 6 24 0 22 4 Rtporl 1rnua1,d ht Rt:All\\' Rt PORI')'\" \\'r,1lon 7.1 H for Norlh I lrtlt RockSchool l)l,1rlct S1ANFORO ACIIIEI 'EM ENT TEST SERIES, NINT/1 E/J/1'/0N IEAC'IIER: ** \u0026lt;.iRADE: 0.1 S('ll()OI.: AI\\IBOY F.LEI\\U-:NTAU.\\I ll'SI l\u0026gt;/\\11' IJ4/16/01 l\u0026gt;IS llll('I: NOIITII I.ITf'I.F. ROCJ\u0026lt; - Sl'IUN(\n21101 RUN l\u0026gt;/\\IF 05/08/111 (iROUI': BL/\\CI( HF./\\IHN\\\nMATIIE~f/\\TICS I.ANGUM\nE 10T/\\L Nll~IIIF.tl TES !'Ell JG 1 orol j I H\u0026lt;atl I n.,,1 Tolal Rcac.J _ \\'ncah Co11111 J\\lath N11111ht1 1'ossihlc 84 JO 54 76 N11111hcrI rslt:tl J(j 36 36 36 Nalio11al lmli\\i1\\ua\\ l'R-S of~ lean N\u0026lt;.\"E .11-4 35-4 32-4 25-4 National I'll Summary 80 - 99 N 2 l 2 2 60 - 79 N 7 4 6 6 40 - 59 N 5 7 6 J 20 - 39 N 9 12 R 9 0/ - /9 N IJ 10 14 16 80 - 99 % 6 8 6 6 60 - 79 % 19 II 17 17 40 - 59 % 14 19 17 8 20 - 39 % 25 33 22 25 QI - 19 % 36 28 39 44 l'c,ccnl AI/Ahovc !he National 50th !'It 28 JJ JI 25 National NCE S!ntistics Meo11 39.6 41 7 4U 4 36.0 Srmulnrd /)cl'iafio11 17.1 17.1 15 8 18.5 f',,rce11tiles 1'90 - 901!, 62 4 64 8 62 8 59 3 ()3 -751!, 51 4 52 5 51 9 49 J Media11 - 50th 35 6 4U.5 37.5 34.9 QI -15th 25.9 29 0 27 8 19.8 J\u0026gt;/0 -10th 21.4 14.8 20 2 I 1.2 \u0026lt;\nTANFORU LF:\\'El,/FORM/BAlTF.RY: rRIMARY 3 / S/ Full Length \"IORl\\1S: Spring 1995 National Norms I l'roh J ~fa4h _Snl\\c ___J'roc La\"~ j I 4(, ]O 4R 36 16 .Hi 26-4 3U-4 27-4 2 J 0 3 5 5 7 4 3 10 10 15 14 14 13 R I) 14 14 19 II 8 28 28 42 39 )9 :lr, JI 31 17 36.7 38 9 37 2 18.2 18.3 13.4 57.9 61.6 57 6 49.3 51 9 41 7 36.4 36 2 35 2 22.5 2).6 29.1 13.4 13 9 21.4 Spell 311 J(, 39-4 \" IJ R 7 u 22 .16 22 19 )6 44 2 14 8 63 6 SH 43 6 34 2 2U.O '-rntr\u0026lt; h,.,,I \"\" tn1u1s1F, r 111 \"'I''' l~hl ~ J'I'\u0026gt;(, h, II,.,.,,,, lnr \\11 lrl11,, r11 -' AIJ~IINIS'I RATOR'S IJATA SUMMA HY FOil MIIIUY F.LF.~TF.N l'AHY ENVIU.UN/\\1EN r, SCIENC'E, SO('l/\\ L SCI EIN('I( Sd- Snr cncc Sele 40 40 J6 .l6 27-4 30-4 () 7 3 15 II 14 0 3 19 22 R 14 42 22 JI 39 25 JJ 37.0 39 0 153 16 6 58 9 58 I 4R 2 54 I 34 I 38 4 24 8 22 5 17.0 16 0 PaPe I BA'TTF.RY TOTALS l.i-.1- U-.in~ 'fhnk~ 1Ja,\nic1011111I cnh1J! Info --5kl\u0026lt; Ball alL 40 47 191 278 35R :u, 36 J(, 36 J6 .1)-4 27-4 24-4 32-4 Jl-4 .l 2 0 I () 7 ~ 6 5 7 I 5 3 7 5 14 7 9 12 II II 17 IR II 13 (, 0 3 0 19 14 17 14 19 J 14 R 19 14 39 19 25 33 JI 3 I 47 SU JI 36 2R 25 19 28 25 4U 8 36 9 3.12 40.0 39 5 16 5 17 3 16 2 13.3 IJ.J (,J 6 64 5 61.0 57.2 57 I 56 8 49.] 44 5 50 9 49 8 38 I 32 7 29 6 4U.5 37 I 2R 6 23 6 23 7 28.7 29 I 20 0 150 IJ.4 226 21 6 Rfpot! ttntnlfrl b) RF.AIIV R ri)RIS'., v,,,l11n l.l.JJ for r,lnrth 1.1111, Rnck '-rbnol llh!olr! SCHOOL AMBOY AMBOY NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPARISON OF GRADE 3 SPRl.1999 TO GRADE 3 SPRING 2000 SCORES ARE IN MEAN ~RCENTILE RANK (PR) YEAR SP 99 SP 00 Total Reading 39 39 Total Math 38 Social Lang Science Science 41 37 35 Basic Btry 43 Comp Btry 42 CLA-IF(G{)\u0026lt;t\"\"\" STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CERTIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 23 Ref, STDF03 MBR, NLRSD0l Staff Development By Topic Location 31 Amboy Elementary e Topic Description WRITING TO PERSUADE FRESH LOOK AT NUMBERS GE'ITING SMARTER SMART STEP ELLA NEW SESSION MEETING THE NEEDS OF ALL STUDENTS CONGITIVE \u0026amp; AFFECTIVE CURRICULUM CLASSROOMM ANAGEMENT Date 7/21/00 7/06/00 7/10/00 7/11/00 7/18/00 7/24/00 8/01/00 8/04/00 21001 21004 21006 21007 21011 21013 21015 21017 21018 21020 21021 21022 21027 21028 21035 21043 21044 21069 MAKE \u0026amp; TAKE JULY 25, 26, 27, \u0026amp; 26, 2000 7 /25/00 SPECIAL ED SPECIAL SHOW SPECIAL ED SPECIAL SHOW PATHWISE MENTORING FRAMEWORFKO R UNDERSTANDINGP OVERTY STRATEGIC PLANNING CHARACTER ED HOT SPRINGS TECHNOLOGYC ONFERENCE PEER LEADERSHIP PLANNING LEVELIZED WORKSHIP-AMBOY AEA 8/04/00 8/03/00 7/24/00 8/04/00 7/07/00 7/21/00 7/31/00 8/30/00 11/03/00 as of 10/16/01 Page [-----ADMINISTRATORS----[-------CERTIFIED-------[------CLASSIFIED-------[ [----MALE--- ---FEMALE-- [----MALE--- ---FEMALE-- [----MALE--- ---FEMALE-- [ B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 DISCIPLINE INFORMATION REFERRALS / ACTIONS TAKEN (PLEASE ATTACH COMPUTER GENERATED INFORMATION) Page 25 Ref, DIS012 CUMULATIVE Disciplinary Referral Summary By Referral Reason FILE YEAR, NLRSD0l Page 10/16/01 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Code Description - - - - - - -TOTAL- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -BLACK- - - - - - - - - -- - -NON-BLACK- - - - - - a.regard for directions of teachers or administrators 02 Disregard for directions of bus drivers, lunch aides, or other authorized school personnel. 03 Disruption and/or interference with the normal and orderly conduct of school \u0026amp; school-sponsored activities. 04 Behavior that involves indecent and/or immoral acts. OS Wagering or any form of gambling. 06 Physical abuse, assault, insult or threatened physical abuse to a school employee. REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 07 Physical abuse, assault, insult, or threatened physical abuse to REF another student or any other individual. OB Possession of a {l)knife, {2)razor, (3)ice pick, (4) explosive, STU REF {S)pistol, {6)rifle, (?)shotgun, (8)pellet gun, (9)mace, (l0)tear gas, STU (ll)pepper spray, or (12) any other object that can be considered a weapon or dangerous instrument. 09 Possession of alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined REF by Arkansas law or School Board Policy\nor using, under the influence, offering for sale or selling alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined by Arkansas law or Board policy. 10 Destruction of or the attempt to destroy school property. STU REF STU 11 Stealing or the attempt to steal school property or the property REF belonging co another individual. -eating or copying the work of another student. 13 Failure to abide by attendance rules. 14 Excessive tardiness to class (Secondary use only). 15 Use of profanity, vulgar language or obscene gestures. 16 Committing extortion, coercion, blackmail or forcing another person to act through the use of force or threat of force. STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 17 Engaging in verbal abuses such as name-calling, ethnic or racial REF slurs, or using derogatory statements to other students, school personnel or other individuals. 18 Hazing. 19 Gang related activities. 20 Sexual harassment. 21 Smoking and/or possession of any tobacco and/or tobacco produce paraphernalia. 22 Possession of any pag~ng device, beeper, mobile/cellular telephone or similar electronic communication device. STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU TOTAL REF STU Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con 64 17. OH 46 19.9H 69 18.40% 35 15.15% 150 40.00% 73 31.60% .26% .43% .00%.00% .26% .43% 49 13.06% 39 16.88% 0 . 00% .00% 2 2 0 0 9 8 2 2 10 9 375 231 .00% .00% 2. 4 0% 3.46% 1.60% 1. 73% .53% . 86% .26% .43\\ .00% .00% 2.40% 3.46% .53% .86% 2. 66% 3.89\\ .00\\ .00\\ .26% .43\\ .00\\ .00% .00\\ .00% .26% . 43% 58 43 64 33 127 62 44 35 0 0 0 7 2 2 10 9 334 209 so 13.33% 35 15.15% 69 18.40% 35 15.15% 134 35. 73% 63 27.27% .26% . 43% .00% .00% .26% 38 10.13% 31 13 .4H 0 . 00% .00% .00% .00% 1. 60% 2.16% .60% 1.73% .53% .86% . 26% . 43% .00% .00% 2. 4 0% . 4 6% .26% .43% 2 .13% 3. 03% .00% .00% .26% . 00% .00% .00% .00% .26% . 4 3% 328 87.46\\ 196 84.84\\ 46 33 64 33 112 53 33 27 7 291 177 14 11 16 10 11 0 0 .73% 4.76% .00% .'00% 4.26% 4.32% . 00%- . 00% .00% .00% .00% .00% 2.93% . 4 6%. 00% .00% .00% .00% .80% 1.29% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00\\ .00% .00% .26% .43% .53% . 86\\ .00% .00% .00% .00% . 00% .00% .00% .00% .00% . 00% 47 12.53% 35 15.15% 12 10 0 15 11 0 0 0 0 0 43 63 Ref, DIS013 Disciplinary Referral Summary By FILE YEAR, NLRSDOl 10/16/01 CUMULATIVE Action Taken AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL -- - - - - -TOTAL- - - - - - - - - -- - - - -BLACK- - - -- - - - -----NON-BLACK------ c.escription Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con = ====================-=======--------------------------==-===-=====----======================================================== 01 Conference with Student ACTIONS 6 1.60% 6 6 1.60% 6 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS s 2 .06% s s 2. 06% s .00% 02 Conference with Parent ACTIONS 7 1.86% 4 7 1 . 86% 4 .00% STUDENTS 7 2 .89% 4 7 2.89% 4 0 .00% 0 03 Conference with Student and Parent ACTIONS 1. 06% 4 3 _ 80% 3 .26% STUDENTS 4 1.65% 4 1.23% . 41% 04 Privileges Denied ACTIONS 75 20. 00% 66 67 17 .86% 59 2.13% 7 STUDENTS 53 21 .90% 46 47 19 . 42% 41 2 . 4 7% 5 OS Behavior Contract ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 06 Detention Hall ACTIONS 78 20 .80% 69 65 17 .33% 57 13 . 4 6% 12 STUDENTS 54 22 .31% 49 42 17 .35% 37 12 4.95% 12 07 Student Will Make Up Time ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 08 Student Placed on Probation ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 09 Student Assignment Class(SAC) ACTIONS .26% 1 .26% .00% 0 STUDENTS .41% . 41% .00% 0 10 Home Suspension ACTIONS 46 12 .26% 39 40 10 .66% 33 1.60% 6 STUDENTS 30 12 .39% 25 24 .91% 19 2.47% 11 Boys/Girls Club Suspension ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 12 Alt School Susp (K-6) ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% -s Suspension ACTIONS 15 4. 00% 15 15 4. 00% 15 0 .00% STUDENTS 13 s .37% 13 13 s .37% 13 .00% 14 Saturday School ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 15 Recommended Expulsion ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 16 Other ACTIONS 10 38 .13% 130 124 33 .OH 113 19 5 .06% 17 STUDENTS 75 30. 99% 69 64 26.44% 59 11 4. 54 % 10 17 Expulsions ACTIONS 0 . 00% 0 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS .00% 0 0 .00% 0 .00\\ 0 TOTAL ACTIONS 375 334 328 87 .46% 291 47 12 .53% 43 STUDENTS 242 216 206 85 .12% 182 36 14 .B7% 34 COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOMES EVALUATION (COE) SURVEY RES UL TS (IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE INSERT AFTER THIS PAGE) Page 26 AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72115-0687 ARKANSAS CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS REPORT Copies to: SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT TEAM VISIT March 20, 2001 Submitted to: James R. Smith, Superintendent Compiled by: Ms. Alice Simelton, School Improvement Supervisor Arkansas Department of Education Mrs. Beverly Kelso, Principal Dr. Dave Westmoreland, M/SIP Unit Leader 2 SCOPE OF THE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING DOCUMENT It is the official intent of the Arkansas Department of Education that this report should be submitted by the chairperson of the Visiting Team directly to the administrators of the school. The subsequent distribution of the report and its availability for public consideration will be at the discretion of those administrators. Neither the chairperson nor the other members of the Visiting Team are authorized to release any information contained in this report without the approval of the school administrators. Information maintained by the Arkansas Department of Education is subject to the laws, policies, and regulations of the State of Arkansas and the United States. Moreover, the team members are not to be held accountable for any injudicious or unauthorized use of this document. School Improvement Visiting Teams ascertain information and provide comments regarding the following: involvement of the school staff and patrons in the school improvement planning process\nthe connection between the school's mission statement and the goals and activities of the plan\nthe specific areas of emphasis in the plan\nthe appropriateness of the plan\nand evidence of continual plan review. The purpose of these teams is to support the development of useful school improvement plans and to advise school planners on the implementation of proposed intervention strategies. Additionally, the Visiting Team will not evaluate individual student performances and will not prescribe a specific company's instructional materials or programs. Any reference to specific instructional materials contained in a Team Report is merely for consideration by the school. AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS March 20, 2001 Ms. Alice Simelton, General Chairperson Mr. Harrell Austin, School Improvement Supervisor Crowley's Ridge Education Cooperative P.O. Box 377 Harrisburg,Arkansas72432 Ms. Kathy Juniel, Teacher Mabelvale Elementary School 9401 Mabelvale Cut-Off Mabel vale, Arkansas 72103 Ms. Felicia Hobbs, Principal Gibbs Magnet Elementary School 1115 West 16th Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Dr. Robert Johns, Professor University of Arkansas at Little Rock 2801 South University Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Ms. Betty Brewer, NCA Representative Reed Elementary North School Caller #8880 Dumas, Arkansas 71639 3 4 On March 20, 2001,an Arkansas Consolidated School Improvement Plan (ACSIP) team visit was conducted at Amboy Elementary School. The information in this report was obtained from observations, the ACSIP, and interviews with the principal, steering committee and faculty. The Visiting Team hopes this report will help the school as the Plan is implemented and updated annually. In addition to certified staff members, Amboy Elementary School involved noninstructional staff members and parents in the ACSIP school improvement process. A parent, a teacher's aide, and the campus supervisor served on the Literacy Committee and a parent and an aide served on the Math Committee. Parents are also involved in several other ways including serving as volunteers in the classroom, the STEP program, Sharefest, and the PTA. Through the STEP program, area churches send mentors to the school for 45 minutes each week to work with high risk students. During Sharefest, 300 individuals from one church held a workday at school to work on the playground, perform building maintenance work, and build bookcases in the classrooms. Children read to parents or care givers each night and parents sign off on the activity. During parent conferences week, the teachers go to satellite communities one day to confer with parents on their turf ( a local church). Over 90% of the parents in the satellite zones attend the conferences. The school also has a PT A that meets quarterly and annual open house day, Parent's Day, and Grandparent's Day. The business community is involved in the school through the Partner's program. American Express and First Star Bank serve the school as business partners. Personnel from these businesses provide tutorial services and serve as judges for school contests. There are obvious connections between the school's mission statement and the goals, interventions, and actions in the ACSIP document. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the entire staff. It was revised slightly to address the changing population of the school. The mission statement focuses on areas such as academic excellence, home and school partnerships, an enriched learning environment, problem solving skills, literacy, and cultural diversity. The entire Plan addressed student academic performance in literacy and mathematics with special emphasis on problem solving skills. The Plan attempts to engage parents through establishing a parental involvement program for one-on-one reading in kindergarten through second grades. The school mission statement comes alive through various activities such as Math Super Stars, Math Whiz, GfT Programs, CHAMPS, Student of the Month, etc. Teachers and other staff extend themselves to the school community by providing additional instructional materials and services to the meet the changing needs of the student population. Within the mission statement, the staff expresses how it welcomes diversity and embraces uniqueness. There is a need to reevaluate this area. Based upon the demographic make-up of the school, including staff, their appears to be a shortage of minority representation. The ACS IP document addresses the content areas of math and literacy. In math, goals are written to improve student performanf_:e in geometry, measurement, and problem solving strategies. This will be accomplished by implementing the Math Superstars program and teacher designed geometry mini-lessons. The geometry textbook will also be supplemented with the Technical Education Research Centers (TERC) curriculum. Problem solving skills will be enhanced by the use of the Benchmark exam released items and open response items in math classes. A twenty-eight student computer lab is being used to individualize math lessons and students are keeping math journals. In literacy, goals are written to improve reading and writing skills across the curriculum. Actions include the establishment ofliteracy corners, a resource book room, and a common planning time for curriculum mapping. Instructional aides will be provided to reinforce Boehm and the Early Prevention of School Failure reading and writing skills to kindergarten students. Staff members are also trained in Reading Recovery, Early Literacy and Learning in Arkansas (ELLA), and Effective Literacy For (ELF) grades two through four. . The Amboy Elementary School ACSIP is built on a data analysis process that included two sources of data, SAT9 and fourth grade Benchmark, with two years of Benchmark data and one year of SAT9 data. The ACSIP model is designed to include three sources of data and a minimum of three years of SAT9 data. Also, the skills addressed by the goals should relate directly to the data skill deficits reflected in the supportive data. The Plan includes interventions and actions of sufficient quantity and quality to have a positive impact on improving student achievement in literacy and math. Several of the strategies, such as Reading Recovery, ELLA, ELF, and curriculum mapping/alignment, have proven through time and research to be 5 successful if properly implemented. The Benchmark statements reveal a desire to improve student performance 3% each year for five years. However, the state will decide the percent of improvement required based on a state adopted formula. The percent will change ea.ch year based on the amount of improvement the previous year. The Visiting Team was impressed with the staffs focus on meeting state standards in math and literacy. This was evident, not only from the ACSIP and staff interviews, but, more importantly, through classroom observation. Although the ACSIP does not document a plan to review data and revise the plan, interviews with the staff revealed their awareness that a plan needed to be in place. The Visiting Team recommends that a committee be appointed to make sure that a proper monitoring system is designed and documented. The Visiting Team expresses appreciation to the administration and staff for their hospitality and helpfulness during the visit. They are to be commended for their desire and efforts to improve the performance of students at Amboy Elementary School. The Visiting Team respectfully submits the following recommendations for consideration: 1. The Visiting Team recommends that the school continue with efforts to train teachers in ELLA and ELF and continue to give students daily opportunities to participate in varied reading and writing activities. 2. The staff is encouraged to follow through with plans to map and align the curriculum. The curriculum should be aligned both horizontally and vertically. It may be helpful to start with math only and address other content areas as time permits. 3. The responsibility for each action should be assigned to only one person if possible. When several people are assigned the responsibility, there is the danger that everyone may wait for someone else to initiate the activity. 4. As the Plan is reviewed and revised, it would be helpful to include the appropriate secondary indicators from the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment, and Accountability Program (ACT AAP). The state will require that the school address any secondary indicators that do not meet the state standards. 5. In order for the ACSIP to be a true consolidated Plan, it is recommended that the Plan include federal program activities, special education plans, gifted and talented programs, equity issues, the technology plan, class reduction funds, and other appropriate initiatives. Also, to satisfy federal program requirements, each intervention should include appropriate research documentation and include actual expenditures. 6. It is important that the interventions include appropriate Plan evaluation actions that allow 6 for evaluation of interventions and actions during the school year rather than having to wait a full year to review SAT9 and Benchmark results. This would give the school data to make decisions about whether to continue an intervention or to \"weed\" the garden. It is better to do a few things well than to give superficial attention to several things. 7. Some of the components listed as actions, such as Reading Recovery, ELLA, ELF, and curriculum mapping/alignment, are significant enough to be developed as interventions with several actions addressing each one. 8. It would be helpful to include the charts and graphs showing the three year history of the Benchmark and SAT9 scores, including the item by item analysis, as a part of the ACSIP document. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2001-2002 SCHOOL PROFILE School: Belwood Elementary Grade: Kindergarten - Fifth Principal: Cynthia Mel tao Race/Gender: W/F Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Secretary: Janelle Oliger Race/Gender: W/F Staff Staff Changes SCHOOL.OFILE Table of Contents Staff Attendance (Certified) * Staff Attendance (Classified) * School Enrollment Elementary Secondary Special Programs Special Education Four Year Comparison * Class Enrollment (Elementary) * Course Enrollment (Secondary) Extended Educational Programs School/District lntitiated Honors and Awards Committee/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities Tryout Information * Student Attendance (After Nine Weeks) Students Retained Subject Area Courses Failed (Secondary) Graduation Information Dropout Statistics (Previous Semester) Achievement/Assessment Data Staff Development Update (Certified) Staff Development Update (Classified) * Discipline Information (After Nine Weeks) Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation (COE) Survey Results Annual School Improvement Plan *INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED BY COMPUTER SERVICES Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Belwood 2001-2002 FULL Tl ME PART Tl ME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS 1 1 CLASSROOM TEACHERS A 1 a SPEC EDUC TEACHERS ? ? 1 I MEDIA SPECIALISTS 1 1 GIT FACILITATORS 1 1 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 1 COUNSELORS 1 1 READING RECOVERY 1 1 H.O.T.S. !TOTAL CERTIFIED J3 5 5 TEACHER AIDES ::l ::l /\nCLERICAL STAFF 1 1 SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS 2 2 CAFETERIA WORKERS \u0026lt; \u0026lt; COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES 1 1 ? CROSSING GUARDS INTERVENTION AIDE PARENT COORDINATOR !TOTAL CLASSIFIED 2 I 1 14 Page 1 Ref: DES00l Staff -45 Belwood Elementary Date: Time: 10/15/01 Based on Base Location 15:40:09 POSITION Administrators Regular Classroom Teachers Special Education Teachers G/T Facilitator Teacher Aides Clerical Staff Custodians Cafeteria Workers Lunch Aides/Crossing Guards Totals ---WHITE--Male Female 0 1 0 8 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 19 ---BLACK--Male Female 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 /'2:' I 2 9 Page 1 ---OTHER--Male Female 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 4 1 6 2 2 3 ....a---. ,...a-r 3:J SCHOOL: Belwood STAFF 2001~2002 (CHANGES AFTER OCTOBER) FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SPEC EDUC TEACHERS MEDIA SPECIALISTS GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST COUNSELORS !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES CLERICAL STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS CAFETERIA WORKERS COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES CROSSING GUARDS !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 2 CERTIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 3 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Certified Staff Absences PAGE by Race and Sex School 45 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY Race / Gender Tot-Emp K-6 7-8 9-10 Black - Female 1 2. 0 Black - Male White - Female 14 25.0 White - Male Other - Female Other Male 3 11-12 Other CLASSIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DAT A) Page 4 - Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Race I Gender Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other Male Classified Staff Absences PAGE 4 by Race and Sex School 45 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY Tot-Emp K-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Other 8 31. 0 2 1. 0 5 9.0 1 PUPIELN R LLNENT BYS CHL LEA~ 60-02-053 CTBER 1, 2001 CURRESCNHTL RSSIGHl1EHTS cmnm: PULASKI DISTRICNTO: RTLHIT TLRTO CKSC HOOOLE:L UOEOLEDM ENTARY GRADSPEA il:K -05 - f.lHITE BLACK HISPANICA SIAH/APIl1 I ND/ALNSA T GRAOTaET AL II F 11 r II r II F i1 F ~ 24 5 2 7 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 Oi 26 6 6 8 5 0 i 0 0 0 0 02 27 3 6 iO 7 0 i 0 0 (i 0 0:j 35 10 \u0026lt;i 10 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 04 24 4 i:, 8 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 30 6 iO 6 6 0 i 0 0 i 0 06 i i 0 (i (i 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHllll1L6 7 35 3'i 49 \u0026lt;iO i 7 0 ii i 0 TllTid.S 4i. 3i: 5Ui: 4.8i: .OX .6i: m\nLUD1E4 3 30 32 42 32 0 i:, ii 0 i 0 GKD!U j 43.4'/. 51.7X 4.2i: .Oi: . 7i: TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN SPECIAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: Belwood 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAMS M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # ssee nPxt. ~CTP Special Ed. % # 14 10 24 1 Q 1 Q \u0026lt;A 1 1 7 \u0026lt;\nA Title I % 21 q l'i n 37.5 29. 29.7 59.4 1.'if 1. 'in 1 1 100 0 Ed/ # 2 2 6 \u0026lt; Q 1 1? Comp. Earlv Succes ,% 16.7 16.7 50.0 25.0 75.0 8.3 8. 3 1000 - # 2 3 5 1 1 7 ? R Gifted Ed. % 25.0 37.5 62.5 12.5 12.5 25.0 100 # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 7 SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL: Belwood PLACEMENT WHITE TOTAL BLACK M F WHITE M F RESOURCE ROOM # 1 PLACEMENT M.R. % 100.0 RESOURCE ROOM # 1 I PLACEMENT LO. % 11 1 11 1 # 2 1 3 4 1 SELF-CONTAINED % # fi 4 10 10 3 SPEECH % 25.0 16.7 41. 7 41.7 12.5 TRANSITION - BA - # SELF-CONTAINED % # RESOURSE ROOM/MH % # 2 2 1 1 RESOURSE ROOM/OHi % so.a so.a 25. I 25.0 # RESOURSE ROOM 504 % # RESOURSE ROOM SE % # % PLACEMENT IS DETERMINED BY PRIMARY HANDICAPPING CONDITION There is a District Self-Contained Unit on this campus 2001-2002 TOTAL OTHER TOTAL BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL 1 100 1 1 11 1 inn 5 8 13 1 1 t24 54.5 4. 1 4. 1 100 4 so.a 100 Yes No (Circle one) Page 8 SCH\u0026amp;: Belwood FOUR YEAR ENROLL-NT COMPARISON OCTOBER 1 DATA (USED TO DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE ENROLLMENT RANGES) STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS BLACK AND NON-BLACK INCLUDING KINDERGARTEN EXCLUDING KINDERGARTEN BLACK 89 BLACK 74 WHITE f\nq WHITE IS? 2001-2002 OTHER a 2001-2002 OTHER ~ TOTAL 11 F,7 0 TOTAL 143 % BLACK \"\" ., % BLACK \u0026lt;\n1 R BLACK 72 BLACK 54 WHITE 70 WHITE 61 20, 00-2001 OTHER A 2000-2001 OTHER ,1 TOTAL 1,1/\n0 TOTAL 11 Q % BLACK LIQ \u0026lt; % BLACK 4'i 4 BLACK -,c, .. BLACK - ' \u0026lt;Sl WHITE f\nf\nWHITE 59 1999-2000 OTHER 2 1999-2000 OTHER 2 TOTAL 1AC 0 TOTAL 11 ?7 % BLACK 53 4 % BLACK so.a BLACK 8\" BLACK 71 WHITE 7n. WHITE ,1 1998-1999 OTHER ? 1998-1999 OTHER 1 TOTAL 1 'iA 0 TOTAL 125 % BLACK % BLACK 2001~2002 0 0 0 0 Page 9 SCHOOL: Belwood CLASS ENROLLMENT 2001-2002 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F -, ., A 1 Jennifer Elms K 06 F w ? ? 4 4 To-- J:i'c1+-nn 1{ na F w -, , ., 1 1 Kelli Dininner 1 14 F w ? -, A -, Tammy Yaqos 1 O'i F w -, C n F, 1 Donna Clifton 2 11 F w .. , A c\n1 Dorie Summons 3 11 F B A 2 c\n4 , Pam Templin 3 10 F w 4 7 R c\n1 Kathy Jackson 4 12 F w .. , n \" \" 1 1 1 Staci Nichols 5 09 F w 1, 2 1 Tisha Long CBI 01 F w 1 1 ? Mary Serbousek CBI 02 F w 1c\n11 4q ,1n ,, 7 - TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 10 ~ e f-: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 1 )ate: 10/15/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL rime: 15: 55: 12 Teacher -t,Jhite- -!Hack- -Other-reach er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot -1 1 AR101 1 ART F w 1 1 3ER DUSEK 1 AR101 2 ART F w 1 1 {AGOS 1 AR101 5 ART F w 2 3 4 3 12 )ININGER 1 AR101 14 ART F w 3 1 3 3 1 11 AR101 ART 6 5 7 6 1 25 _ONG 1 AR201 1 ART F w 1 1 :LIFTON 1 AR20i 13 ART F w 3 6 8 6 i 24 AR201 ART 3 6 9 6 1 25 3ERBOUSEK 1 AR301 ..., ART F w 1 1 C. fEMPLIN 1 AR301 10 ART F w 4 2 5 4 1 16 3UMMONS 1 AR301 11 ART F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 AR301 ART 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSON 1 AR401 . ..., 1 C. ART F w 4 7 8 5 i 25 AR401 ART 4 7 8 5 1 25 _ONG 1 AR501 1- ART F w 1 1 ..., C. \\JICHOLS 1 AR501 9 ART F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 AR501 ART 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 _ONG 1 ELM 1 C B I F w 1 ..., 1 4 C. 3WUSEK 1 ELM 2 C B I F w 1 1 2 4 ELM C B I 2 i 4 1 8 DEPT TOTALS ..., 1 4 1 8 C. _ONG 1 EN101 1 ENGLISH F w 1 1 3ERBOUSB, 1 EN101 2 ENGLISH F w 1 1 YAGOS 1 EN101 5 ENGLISH F w 2 3 4 3 12 DININGER 1 EN101 14 ENGLISH F w 3 1 3 3 1 11 EN101 ENGLISH 6 5 7 6 1 25 _ONG 1 EN201 1 ENGLISH F w 1 1 CLIFTON 1 EN201 13 ENGLISH F t,J 3 6 8 6 1 ..., A c.-4 EN201 ENGLISH 3 6 9 6 1 25 SERBOUSEK 1 EN301 2 ENGLISH F !,J 1 1 TEMPLIN 1 EN301 10 ENGLISH F w 4 ..., 5 4 .i 16 C. SUMMONS 1 EN301 11 ENGLISH F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 EN301 ENGLISH 10 3 10 9 ~, C. 34 JACKSON 1 EN401 12 ENGLISH F l,J 4 7 8 5 1 25 EN401 ENGLISH 4 7 8 5 1 25 LONG 1 EN501 1 ENGLISH F w 1 1 ..., C. NICHOLS 1 EN501 9 ENGLISH F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 - EN501 ENGLISH 6 10 6 6 1 ... 30 DEPT TOTALS ...,0 31 40 32 1 6 139 C. .. ~ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 2 )ate: 10/15/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL rime: 15:55:12 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other-reacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot =-EN 1 GK 4 GRADE K F w 2 2 4 4 12 ::L ::\n1 GK 6 GRADE K F w 3 3 4 1 i 12 GK GRADE K 5 ,, 7 8 1 1 24 C. DEPT TOTALS 5 2 7 B 1 1 24 {AGOS 1 Gl 5 GRADE 01 F w 2 3 4 3 12 HNINGER 1 G1 14 GRADE 01 F w ~ 1 3 3 1 11 Gl GRADE 01 5 4 7 6 1 ,.,~ c.~ DEPT TOTALS 5 4 7 6 1 23 .I. :LIFTON 1 G2 13 GRADE 02 F w 3 6 B 6 1 24 G2 GRADE 02 3 6 8 6 1 24 DEPT TOTALS 3 6 8 6 1 24 fEMPLIN 1 G3 10 GRADE 03 F w 4 2 5 4 i i6 3UMMONS 1 G3 11-- GRADE 03 F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 G3 GRADE 03 10 3 9 9 2 33 DEPT TOTALS 10 3 9 9 2 33 JACKSON 1 G4 12 GRADE 04 F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 G4 GRADE 04 4 7 8 5 i 25 - DEPT TOTALS 4 7 8 5 1 25 \\IICHOLS 1 GS 9 GRADE 05 F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 G5 GRADE 05 6 10 C. 5 1 1 28 ,J DEPT TOTALS 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 _QNG 1 HL101 1 HEALTH F w 1 1 0- 3ERBOUSEK 1 HL101 ,, HEALTH F w 1' 1 C. \\c.) YAGOS 1 HL101 C. HEALTH F w ,., 3 4 3 12 ,J C. DININGER 1 HL101 14 HEALTH F 14 3 1 3 3 1 11 HL101 HEALTH 6 5 7 6 1 25 _ONG 1 HL201 1 HEALTH F w 1 1 CLIFTON 1 HL201 13 HEALTH F w 3 6 8 6 -' 24 HL201 HEALTH 3 6 9 6 1 25 SERB DUSEK 1 HL301 2 HEALTH F w 1 1 TEMPLIN 1 HL301 10 HEALTH F l,J 4 2 5 4 1 16 SUMMONS 1 HL301 11 HEALTH F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 HL301 HEALTH 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSOl\\l 1 HL401 12 HEALTH F w 4 7 B C. l 25 ,J HL401 HEALTH 4 7 8 5 1 25 ~~LS 1 HL501 1 HEALTH F w 1 1 ...., C. 1 HL501 9 HEALTH F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 HL501 HEALTH 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 ~ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page ,.., --~ late: 10/15/0i BELWOOD ELEMENT ARV SCHOOL 1me: 15:55:13 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other,- eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Se:.: Race M F M F M F Tot .oe 1 HN101 1 HANDWRITING F w i 1\nERBOUSEK 1 HN101 2 HANDWRITING F w i 1 'AGOS 1 HN101 5 HANDWRITING F w 2 3 4 -.-.-.:.\n. , 12 iININGER i HN10i 14 HANDWRITING F w 3 i 3 ., ....., i ii HN101 HANDWRITING 6 5 7 6 i 25 _ONG 1 HN201 1 HANDWRITING F w 1 1 '.LIFTON 1 HN201 13 HANDWRITING F w .-.:.) .., 6 8 6 i 24 HN20i HANDWRITING 3 6 9 6 i 25 ,ERBOUSEK 1 HN301 2 HANDWRITING F w 1 1 rEMPLIN 1 HN301 10 HANDWRITING F l.J 4 2 5 4 1 16 3UMMONS 1 HN301 11 HANDl.JRIT I NG F B 6 1 4 5 i 17 HN301 HANDWRITING 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSON 1 HN401 12 HANDWRITING F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 HN401 HANDl.JRIT I NG 4 7 8 5 1 25 _ONG 1 HN501 1HANDWRITING F w 1 1 2 .JICHOLS 1 HN501 9 HANDl.JRIT I NG F l.J 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 HN501 HANDl.JRIT I NG 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 _ONG 1 MA101 1 MATH F l.J 1 1 3E-USEK 1 MA101 2 MATH F (,j 1 i r\"A 1 MA101 5 MATH F w 2 3 4 3 12 )ININGER 1 MA101 14 MATH F w 3 i 3 _-:_l , 1 11 MAiOi MATH 6 5 7 6 i 25 _ONG 1 MA201 1 MATH F w 1 .I. :LIFTON 1 MA201 13 MATH F w 3 6 8 6 1 24 MA201 MATH 3 6 9 6 i 25 3ERBOUSEK 1 MA301 2 MATH F w 1 1 fEMPLIN 1 MA301 10 MATH F w 4 2 5 4 i i6 3UMMONS 1 MA301 11 MATH F B 6 1 4 5 i 17 MA301 MATH 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSON 1 MA401 12 MATH r l.J 4 7 8 5 1 25 MA401 MATH 4 7 8 5 1 25 _ONG 1 MA501 1 MATH F w 1 1 2 \\IICHOLS 1 MA501 9 MATH F l.J 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 MASO! MATH 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 - NG 1 MU101 1 MUSIC F w 1 1 3ERBOUSEK 1 MU101 2 MUSIC F l.J 1 1 YA. 1 MU101 5 MUSIC F L.,J 2 3 4 3 12 DI GER i MUiOi 14 MUSIC F w 3 i 3 3 1 11 MU101 MUSIC 6 5 7 6 1 25 ?ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 4 iate: 10/15/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \"ime: 15: 55: 14 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- each er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot -- 1 MU201 1 MUSIC F w 1 1 :LI ON 1 MU201 13 MUSIC F w 3 6 8 6 1 24 MU201 rJUSIC 3 6 9 6 1 25\nERBOUSEK 1 MU301 ,., MUSIC F w 1 1 C. \"EMPLIN 1 MIJ301 10 MUSIC F w 4 2 5 4 1 16 \u0026gt;UMMONS 1 MU301 11 MUSIC F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 MU301 MUSIC 10 3 10 9 ,., c.. 34 JACKSON 1 MU401 12 MUSIC F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 MU401 MUSIC 4 7 8 5 1 25 .ONG 1 MU501 1 MUSIC F w 1 1 2 HCHOLS 1 MU501 9 MUSIC F l,J 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 MU501 MUSIC 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 .ONG 1 PE101 1- PHYS ED F w 1 1 :\nERB DUSEK 1 PE101 2 PHYS ED F w 1 1 (AGOS 1 PE101 5 PHYS ED F w 2 3 4 3 12 HNINGER 1 PE101 14 PHYS ED F w 3 1 3 3 1 11 PElOl PHYS ED 6 5 7 6 1 25 .ONG 1 PE201 1 PHYS ED F w 1 1 :L.N 1 PE201 13 PHYS ED F w 3 6 8 6 1 24 PE201 PHYS ED 3 6 9 6 1 25 3ERBOUSB-\u0026lt;. 1 PE301 ,., PHYS ED F w 1 C. ... fEMPLIN 1 PE301 10 PHYS ED F w 4 ,., 5 4 1 16 t::.. 3UMMONS 1 PE301 11 PHYS ED F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 PE301 PHYS ED 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSON 1 PE401 12 PHYS ED F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 PE401 PHYS ED 4 7 8 5 .1. . 25 _ONG 1 PE501 1 PHYS ED F w 1 1 ,., C. llICHOLS 1 PE501 9 PHYS ED F w 6 10 5 5 1 .1. . 28 PE501 PHYS ED 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 _ONG 1 RE101 1 READING F w 1 1 3ERBOUSEK 1 RE101 2 READING F w 1 1 rAGOS 1 RE101 5 READING F w 2 3 4 3 12 )ININGER 1 RE101 14 READING F w 3 1 ..:l 3 1 11 RE101 READING 6 5 7 6 l ,':\".l.C.,: C _ONG 1 RE201 1 READING F w .1 . 1 :LIFTON 1 RE201 13 READING F w 3 6 8 6 1 24 3E.USEK RE201 READING 3 6 9 6 1 25 1 RE301 ,., READING F w 1 1 C. !ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 5 iate: 10/15/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: 15:55:14 . Teacher -!,/hi te- -Black- -Other- . eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot E-IN 1 RE301 10 READING F w 4 ..., C. 5 4 1 16 3UMMONS 1 RE301 11 READING F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 RE301 READING 10 3 10 9 ~, C. 34 JACKSON 1 RE401 12 READING F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 RE401 READING 4 7 8 5 1 25 .ONG 1 RE501 1 READING F w 1 1 ..., .I. C. HCHOLS 1 RE501 9 READING F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 RE501 READING 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS ...,0 C. , 31 40 32 1 6 139 ~ERB0USB\u0026lt;. 1 SC301 2 SCIENCE F w 1 1 fEMPLIN 1 SC301 10 SCIENCE F l,J 4 ~, C. 5 4 1 16 3UMMONS 1 SC301 11 SCIENCE F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 SC301 SCIENCE 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACK.SON 1 SC401 12'SCIENCE F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 SC401 SCIENCE 4 7 8 5 1 25 _ONG 1 SC501 1 SCIENCE F w 1 1 ..., C. IICHOLS 1 SC501 9 SCIENCE F w 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 SC501 SCIENCE 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 - DEPT TOTALS 20 20 24 20 1 4 89 _ONG 1 SP101 1 SPELLING F w 1 1 3ERBOUSEK 1 SP101 2 SPELLING F w 1 1 (AG0S 1 SP101 5 SPELLING F l,J ..., c:.. 3 4 3 12 )Il'HNGER 1 SP101 14 SPELLING F w 3 1 3 3 1 11 SPl0l SPELLING 6 5 7 6 1 25 _ONG 1 SP201 1 SPELLING F w 1 1 :LIFTON 1 SP201 13 SPELLING F w 3 6 8 6 1 24 SP201 SPELLING 3 6 9 6 1 25 3ERBOUSEK 1 SP301 2 SPELLING F w 1 1 rEMPLIN 1 SP301 10 SPELLING F !,J 4 2 5 4 1 16 3UMM0NS 1 SP301 11 SPELLING F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 SP301 SPELLING 1 ,J 3 10 9 C: 34 JAO~SON 1 SP401 12 SPELLING C' \" w 4 7 8 5 1 25 SP401 SPELLING 4 7 8 5 1 25 _ONG 1 SP501 1 SPELLING F w 1 .I. C: \\IICHOLS 1 SP501 9 SPELLING F 1,J 6 10 5 5 1 .iI . 28 SP501 SPELLING 6 10 6 6 1 1 30 DEPT TOTALS 29 31 40 32 1 6 139 3E-USEK 1 SS301 ..c.. ., soc STUDIES F w 1 1 fEMPLIN 1 SS301 10 soc STUDIES F w 4 2 5 4 1 16 \u0026lt;ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 6 )ate: 10/15/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL iime: 15:55: 15 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other-ieac her Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot ,U-NS 1 SS301 11 soc STUDIES F B 6 1 4 5 1 17 SS301 soc STUDIES 10 3 10 9 2 34 JACKSON 1 SS401 12 soc STUDIES F w 4 7 8 5 1 25 SS401 soc STUDIES 4 7 8 5 i 25 _ONG 1 SS501 1 soc STUDIES F w 1 1 2 HCHOLS 1 SS501 9 soc STUDIES F l.J 6 10 5 5 1 i 28 SS501 soc STUDIES 6 10 6 6 1 i 30 DEPT TOTALS 20 20 24 20 1 4 89 SCHOOL TOTALS 336 352 456 368 13 69 1594 SCHO. Belwood EXTENDED EDUCA .. AL PROGRAMS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAM MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL GOVERNOR'S # SCHOOL % # BOY'S STATE % # GIRL'S STATE % # SUMMER SCHOOL % PRE- # KINDERGARTEN % # KINDERGARTEN % # , 7 ' ? ? 4 7 FIRST % , ,,, -, ?Q\" ,.,-, a ?Q \" ?Q \" ~., 1 11 f1\" n # SECOND % # THIRD % # FOURTH % # FIFTH % # SIXTH % GRADES SEVEN # AND EIGHT % GRADES NINE # THRU TWELVE % QUEST # -, ,,, \" -, -, -, SUMMER SCHOOL % 1 R ? 'l6 ' o\na o\na 1 a , 1 Q -, ,,., -, ?7 \".I ,nn n Page 12 SCHOOL: Belwood HONORS AND AWARDS I List all honors and awards - - - - - be seecific I HONORS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 7-, lln ,\n-, 7-, -,7 cc ' ,, ., ,, REGULARH ONORR OLL % 19.0 33.0 52.0 19.0 26.5 4'i 'i A 1 7 ..2.....5._ 1nn n # -,a ?,1 lea-, 11 11 _6.4__ ? Q -1..Q.._ 1 -,7 PRINCIPAL'SH ONORR OLL % 28.5 17.5 46.0 22.6 24.1 46.7 -1...,__5__ ____5___,_JJ.l._.. .3._____ inn '.1 # ___ll_ ?n c\n7 _2L_ ?4 ----45....__ ., .,, 7 1 nLI 1G~od Citizen % -:,n o , a ? c\nn 7 ?n? ?\u0026lt; 1 A-, -, -, n ., a C -, nn n # \"\" ?C ,.,a 11,1 7,1 1QQ , Q a -,-,c PERFECT ATTENDANCE % 1 Cl 1 ? ? -, A1 .,, .,, n -,-, n \"\" n -, ') .,, ---2......6_ 1 nn n # -1..]___ 1 7 \u0026lt;LI 1? 7-, 3.5 , ., Boost Students % A .::\n~ ?, ., ?, ., ,If\nF, 1 F. 4 111 c\n,17 a 1 LI II 1 _s__..s__ 1 nn n # 16 8 24 ?7 ' ?'i C:? ? ?A Most Helpful % 20.5 10.2 30.7 34.6 32.1 66.7 2.6 2.6 inn n # 1 7 7 ?LI 1,1 ., ,-, .,, , Most Improved Soci lI. 41.5 17.0 58.5 34.2 7.3 41 'i inn n # .,, c\n0 ?.., 11\" .,,., AQ Mr,~t. Tmnr~ -~-' 11.....,,rlomi .'.i,'I1,., s....._.. .: lJL.A LJA. 1l 48 0 33 3 Rl -, -100 # 7? 7,\n11 l!A an IF.F. 1 c\n.5___ \" \" 1? Math % 22.8 24.0 46.8 28.5 20.9 49.4 1.9 1.9 00 # c-, 4R 1 n1 77 74 1, \"' ? A 1 n ?\u0026lt;:7 Spelling % 20.2 18.3 38.5 29.4 28.2 57 F. .8 ' 1 11 Q 100 # ,1 1F. ?n ?7 ?R lc\nc\n7c\nHandwri tng /K % 5.4 21. 3 26.T 36.0 37.3 73.3 inn # 9 4. 11 4 1 17 ., 1 1?1 Computer Reading % 39.1 17.4 56.5 17.4 13.0 30.4 13. 1 13.1 100 # 7 ,1 11 \" c\nn , _j___ I? 1 Grade 2-Story Writin % 33.3 19. 1 52.4 19.1 23.8 42.9 4.7 4.7 100 # C ? -, -, .,, ~ 1,1 Socia1 Studies % ,,~ n ,.,, n ~n n 21 0 29.0 c\nn n nn # , ? ?n ..,,, '\" 1'7 32 1 f,'i SCIENCE AWARD % .. n C -,n .., .,, .. ? 23 1 ?F. 1 /IQ ? 1 F, 1nn # ENGLISHA WARP % # C? \"' ,n., C C,LI 1nc n 10 I? 1 A READINGA WARD % . 23.9 23.4 47.1 ?1 4 74 A .,, Q ') .,, .,, 1 A C nn Page 13 SCHOOL: Belwood HONORS AND AWARDS List all honors and awards - - - - - be specific HONORS WHITE TOT/IL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # ., \" Q ., A , ., Health % ,.,., ' AC ' en -, ,,., , -, -, .,,, 0 ,nn # , - - \" - - C -, Assignment Notebor k% 14,3 71.4 85-7 14 . ..l_ 14.3 inn Music # i 1 \" 1 , 'i CBI Most Improved % 60.0 20.0 80.0 ?n.n ?n n ,nn CBI Most Improved # 3 2 5 1 1 \" Language Arts % c\nn n .,., ., \"\" ., , \" 7 '\" -, '\"\" CBI Most Improved # 1 1 , Listeninq % 100.0 inn n # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % . # % # % Page 13 SCHOOL: Belwood COMMITTEES/PARENT INVOLVEMENT 2001-2002 E M P L O Y E E S PARENTS/ PATRONS 0 F F I C E R s WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER TL WHITE BLACK OTHER TL COMMITTEE M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F EQUITY # ? 1 1 1 1 1 7 COMMITTEE % 29. ( I4.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 100 PARENT TEACHER # 1 1R 7 14 ?Q r\nlA ? e\nQe\n1 \" ASSOCIATION % 1.0 lQ n ?n 1e\nn 1,n n f\n.0 ,an ?n 'i.O ,mn lLl n Afi.O # 58 m 34 126 3 4 :02 VOLUNTEERS % 11.6 55.2 6.8 25.1 .6 .7 100.0 # 4 1 5 Q.ESt Qlse stu:ly % oo.o\u0026gt; 20.0 11mn # 1 1 4 Rlrtn2rs in F.:tl:B.tic \"% 75.0 25.0 1mn # 4 4 !:ci.al Events % ,mr '\"\"\" Cl\"aracter-Cart:eroo # 4 Tu:dlin\nJ % ,mr !:ci.al Pro:Jrars # 4 4 % ,m.c 1,mn # 1 1 4 \u0026amp;ll1shire % 75.0 25.0 100.0 Ial:els far # 1 ? \" El::lu::Btim % on\" =7 '\"\" KSIP steerin\nJ # ? ? A O:nrntit.e a % :D.0 :D.0 100.0 # % Page 14 SCHOOL: Belwood EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 2001-2002 ACTIVITY MEMBERSHIP SPONSORS OR WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL CLUB M F M F M F M F M F M F # 1 1 1 ., FIRE MARSHALLS % 33.3 33.3 33.3 100.0 # 2 1 1 4 FT..,AG MONITORS % ~-0 25.0 25.0 100.0 BOOKSTORE # 2 1 1 4 MONITORS % ~-0 25.0 25.0 100.0 STUDENT # 2 3 5 4 1 15 2 ? COUNCIL % 13.3 20.0 33.3 '26. 7 6.7 100.0 100.r ,m.n STUDENT # 3 1 1 \"5 COUNCIL OFFICERS % Fl) ?() ?() 1m_n CHM'S # 6 10 5 5 1 1 28 4 4 % 21.4 36.0 17.9 17.9 3.5 3.5 1m.o 1m ,m lm:assad:lrs # 3 5 5 4 1 18 1 1 % 16.7 27.8 27.8 22.2 5.5 100.0 100 11m # 1 1 1 3 Attamn:E Cl:ll1t % .,..,, .,..,, .,..,, I.m:h M:ni.t ars 100.0 M:n:nirg Am::ux:Ers # 1 I 1 2 % ~-0 ~-0 100.0 # 2 1 3 ~~~ % 66.6 33.3 100.0 A=Thl.y 1-e.lfE['S # 1 1 2 % \"\" (\\ ,snr, 100.0 B:xK B3s\u0026lt;et M:ni.toc I# 3 3 % 100.0 100.0 .Eq..ripralt ltnitors # 1 1 2 % ~-0 ~-0 100.0 Page 15 2001-2002 STUDENT ATTENDANCE AFTER NINE-WEEKS (ATTACH COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 17 SCHOOL: Belwood STUDENTS RETAINED 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # KINDERGARTEN % # FIRST % # 1 1 SECOND % 100.0 100.0 # THIRD % # FOURTH % # FIFTH % # SIXTH % # SEVENTH % # E'IGHT % # NINTH % # TENTH % # ELEVEN % # TWELFTH % Page 18 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT-ASSESSMENT DATA SAT-9 (PLEASE ATTACH MOST RECENT INFORMATION) Page 22 A() AP PRIMARY (GR 4) BENCHMARK EXAMINATION ge: 1 MATHEMATICS SCHOOL SUMMARY REPORT: COMBINED POPULATION Athnsas Dtstrtct Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL OISTRICT School Name: BELWOOO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Grade: 04 ComprchusivTee stingA. ssessmcnl LEA N: 60-02 School Number: 053 Date of Test: Aprt 1 2001 \u0026amp;AccounlabihlyP rogram Total Number of Students Tested: 25 Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; .Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Belov Basic (BEL) Basic (BAS) Proftctent (PRO) Advanced (ADV) 154 and below 155-199 200-249 250 and above School District Region _State_ _j~- District _B.!~ 2.1!.!!_ School_ Otstrtct _E.!g!.2!!_ 2.1!1!_ School_ District .J!.!gton State A 11 Students 11 294 4 . .165 13,701 5 121 1,872 6.521 3 88 1. 789 6,653 6 147 2, 101 8, 184 44X 45X 42X 39X 2ox 19X 19X 19X 12X ux 18X 19X 24X 23X 21x 23X Gender Fe11ale 6 162 1. 975 6,466 4 61 937 3,218 1 45 859 3,218 5 70 999 3.970 38X 48X 41X 38X 2sx 18X 20X 19X 6X 13X ,ax 19X 31X 21X 21X 24X hie 5 132 2,186 7,218 1 59 932 3,296 2 43 930 3,432 1 77 1,099 d, 203 56X 42X 42X ox 11X 19X 18X ,ax 22X 14X ,ax 19X 11X 25X 21X 23X Ethntc1ty Asian/Pactftc Islander 0 1 12 73 0 1 12 40 0 1 10 49 0 0 21 80 ox 33X 22X 30X ox 33X 22X 17X ox 33X ,ax 20X ox ox 38X 33X African A11ertcan 7 241 2,286 5,718 2 79 553 1,251 2 42 345 774 0 47 230 500 64X 59X 67X 69X ,ax 19X 16X 15X ,ax ,ox ,ox 9X ox 11X 7X 6X Hispanic 0 5 90 537 0 2 32 217 0 3 28 187 1 3 39 188 ox 38X X 48X ox 15X 17X 19X ox 23X 15X 17X 100X 23X 21X 17X Native A11er1can 0 2 14 98 0 0 8 48 0 0 3 48 0 0 5 46 ox 100X 47X 41X ox ox 27% 20X ox ox ,ox 20X ox ox 17X 19X White 4 44 1,696 7,132 3 38 1,235 4,901 1 42 1,383 5,544 5 96 1,770 7,298 31% 2ox 28% 29X 23X 17X 2ox 2ox ax 19X 23X 22X 38X X 29X 29X Other 0 0 42 72 0 1 19 30 0 0 10 20 0 1 24 40 ox ox x 44X ox SOX 20X 19X ox ox 11X 12X ox 50X 25X 25X Gender/Ethnlc1 ty Fe11ale As Ian/Pac 1f 1 c Is 1 and er 0 1 6 29 0 0 8 23 0 0 3 24 0 0 10 36 ox ,oox 22X 26X ox ox 30X 21X ox ox 11X 21X ox ox 37X nx Afr.1can A11erlcan 4 132 1,087 2. 720 2 40 290 662 1 21 176 402 0 24 122 258 57X 61X 65X 67X 29X 18X 17X 16X ux ,ox 11x ,ox ox 11X 7% 6X Hispanic 0 0 32 266 0 1 17 105 0 1 13 82 1 3 24 99 ox ox 37X X ox 2ox 2ox 19X ox 2ox ,sx ,sx 100X 60X 28X ,ax Native 'A11erlcan 0 0 7 42 0 0 5 29 0 0 1 25 0 0 1 20 ox ox SOX 36X ox ox 36X 25X ox ox 7X 22X ox ox 7X 17X White 2 28 813 3,345 ' 2 19 602 2,371 0 23 656 2.660 4 42 821 3,522 25X 2SX 28X 28X 25X 17X 21X 20X ox 21X 23X 22% SOX 38X 28X 30X Other 0 0 16 31 0 1 10 14 0 0 5 10 0 1 19 26 ox ox 32X 38X ox sox 2ox 17% ox ox ,ox 12% ox SOX 38X 32X Gender/E thn1c1 ty Male Astan/Paciftc Islander 0 0 6 44 0 1 4 17 0 1 7 25 0 0 11 44 ox ox 21X 34X ox SOX ux 13X ox sox 2sx 19X ox ox 39X 34X African A11er-1can 3 109 1,198 2,993 0 38 262 588 1 21 169 372 0 23 107 240 75X 57% 69X 71X ox 20X ,sx ux 25X 11X ,ox 9X ox 12X x X Hispanic 0 5 58 271 0 1 15 112 0 2 15 105 0 0 15 89 ox 63X 56X 47X ox 13X 15X 19X ox 25X ,sx ,ax ox ox ,sx 15X Native A11ertcan 0 2 7 55 0 0 3 19 0 0 2 23 0 0 4 26 ox ,oox X 45X ox ox 19X ,sx ox ox 13X 19X ox ox 25X 21X White 2 16 883 3,785 1 19 633 2,527 1 19 727 2,884 1 54 947 3,770 ox ,sx 28X 29X 20X ,ax 20X 19X 20X 18X 23X 22X 20X sox 30X 29X Other 0 0 25 40 0 0 9 16 0 0 5 10 0 0 5 14 ox ox 57X SOX ox ox 20X 20X ox ox 11X 13X ox ox 11X ,ax A() AP PRIMARY (GR 4) BENCHMARK EXAMINATION LITERACY SCHOOL SUMMARY REPORT: COMBINED POPULATION ge: 2 A1hnu1 Otstrtct Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL CI STRICT School Name: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Grade: 04 CompithcuivcT c11111Agu, cumcnl LEA I: 60-02 School Number: 053 Date of Test: Aprtl 2001 \u0026amp;Acco11n11bihtyP101nm Total Nunt\u0026gt;er of Students Tested: 25 Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; .Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Below Baste (BEL) Baste (BAS) Proftctent (PRO) Advanced (ADV) 178 and be 1 ow 179-199 200-249 250 and above School Q.!strtct _E.!_a~ 2!..!..!.!_ _School Otstrtct -8!1i1!2!L 2!il!!.__ School Otsttl..! -8.!Q!filL ~ _School District ~ton State A 11 Students 9 260 3, pt 10,417 8 212 3,197 11,344 7 170 3,435 12,660 1 8 174 638 36X ox 31X 30X 32X 33X 32% 32% 28X 26X 35X 36X x ,x 2% 2x Gender Fertale 6 124 1. 202 3.895 5 111 1. 538 5,366 4 99 1,924 7. 179 1 4 106 432 JBX 37X 25X 23X ~1X 33X 32X 32X 25X 29X ox 43X 6X tX 2% 3X Illa le 3 136 1,915 6,508 3 100 1,656 5,966 3 71 1,508 5,469 0 4 68 206 33X ux 37X 36% 33X 32X 32X 33X 33X 23X 29X 30X ox ,x 1X 1X Ethnicity Asian/Pact ft c Islander 0 2 7 47 0 1 21 86 0 0 24 100 0 0 3 9 ox 67X 13X 19X ox 33X 38X 36X ox ox x 41X ox ox sx X African A11erlcan 8 210 1,663 4.084 2 128 1,087 2,623 1 68 648 1,502 0 3 16 34 73X s1x x SOX 18X 31X 32X 32X 9X 17% 19X 18X ox ,x ox ox H1span1c 0 7 72 428 0 3 58 386 0 2 56 306 1 1 3 9 ox 54X 3BX 3BX ox 23X 31X 34X ox 15X 30X 27% 100X BX 2X ,x Native A11ertcan 0 2 10 79 0 0 11 87 0 0 9 74 0 0 0 0 ox tOOX 33X 33X ox ox 37X 36X ox ox 30X 31X ox ox ox ox Vhtte 1 38 1,328 5,684 6 78 1,966 8,045 6 100 2,640 10,564 0 4 150 582 BX 17X 22X 23X 46X JSX 32X 32X 46X 45X 43X 42% ox 2X 2X 2X Other 0 0 23 44 0 2 35 60 0 0 35 55 0 0 2 3 ox ox 24X 27X ox 100X 37X 37X ox ox 37X 34X ox ox 2x 2x Gender/Ethntct ty Fenale Asian/Pac 1 ftc Is lander 0 1 3 9 0 0 6 35 0 0 15 62 0 0 3 6 ox ,oox 11X BX ox ox 22X 31X ox ox 56X 55X ox ox 11X sx African A11ertcan 5 103 666 1.634 2 67 593 1,429 0 47 408 960 0 0 8 19 71X 47X ox ox 29X 31X 35X 35X ox 22% 24X 24X ox ox ox ox Hispanic 0 1 23 177 0 1 29 191 0 2 33 181 1 1 1 3 ox 20X 27X 32X ox 20X 34X 35X ox ox 38X 33X 100X 20X ,x 1X Native A11ertcan 0 0 4 32 0 0 6 35 0 0 4 49 0 0 0 0 ox ox 29X 28X ox ox 43X 30X ox ox 29X 42X ox ox ox ox Vhlte 1 18 489 2,006 3 41 880 3,627 4 50 1,431 5,865 0 3 92 400 13X 16X 17X 17X 38X 37X 30X 30X sox 45X 49X X ox 3X 3X 3X Other 0 0 9 18 0 2 15 24 0 0 24 36 0 0 2 3 ox ox 18X 22% ox ,oox 30X 30X ox ox 48X x ox ox X x Gender/Ethntct ty le Astan/Paclftc Islander 0 1 4 38 0 1 15 51 0 0 9 38 0 0 0 3 ox SOX 14X 29X ox 50X 54% 39X ox ox 32X 29X ox ox ox 2X African A11ertcan 3 107 997 2,448 0 60 492 1,189 1 21 239 541 0 3 8 15 75X 56X 57X SBX ox 31X 28X 28X 25X 11X 14X 13X ox 2X ox ox Hispanic 0 6 49 251 0 2 29 195 0 0 23 125 0 0 2 6 ox 75X x x ox 25X 28X 34X ox ox 22X 22% ox ox 2x ,x Nat Ive Al'ler 1 can 0 2 6 47 0 0 5 51 0 0 5 25 0 0 0 0 ox 1oox 38X 38X ox ox 31X 41X ox ox 31X 20X ox ox ox ox Vhlte 0 20 839 3. 676 3 37 1,086 4,415 2 50 1,207 4,693 0 1 58 182 ox 19X 26X 28X 60X 34X 34X 34X 40X 46X 3BX 36X ox 1x 2X tX Other 0 0 13 25 0 0 20 36 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 0 ox ox 30X 31X ox ox 45X 45X ox ox 25X 24X ox ox ox ox AC~AP Arkins.as Comprchcnsi~cT csling, Assessment PRIMARY (GRADE 4) BE~HMARK EXAMINATION SCHOOLROSTIIPREPORT MEAN SCALE SCORES uate or Page: 3 \u0026amp; Acco11n11biliP1y,o gum PROFICIENCY CLASSIFICATION SCALE SCORE District Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA #: 6002 School Name: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Number: 053 Mathefflattcs Literacy Below Baste (BEL) 154 and below 178 and below Baste (BAS) 155-199 179-199 COMBINED POPULATION Mean Scale Score for School /Di strtct/Regton/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 179 171 173 179 LITERACY 187 184 190 191 GENERAL POPULATION Mean Scale Score for School /Di strtct/Regton/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 199 191 186 193 LITERACY 191 192 195 196 I EP STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School/District/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 038 090 085 086 LITERACY 160 150 152 152 LEP STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School /Di stri ct/Regt on/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 000 067 153 142 ' LITERACY 000 140 178 176 HIGHLY MOBILE STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School /Di strict/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 188 118 151 156 LITERACY 193 176 181 182 Proficient (PRO) 200-249 200-249 Advanced (ADV) 250 and above 250 and above STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION TEACHER: ******************** GRADE: 01 SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 DISTRlCT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK - SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GROUP: GENERAL POPULATION Mean Mean Median National SUBTESTS AND Number Raw National Grade lndiv f-LI.lT..JnLT.,dUl.\u0026lt;.l_e ___ __TiPc\u0026lt;et5P..[-lf :ILJ-\u0026lt;~'.a:nr~u: fc+....r\"n1r.l..L' -+Lqlw~-x-..'+. J:K:.:iD._R- +.. \u0026lt;--:- l-------111 Total Reading 19 82.5 63.4 2.1 74-6 Word Study Skills 19 30.8 73.6 3.5 87-7 Word Reading 19 21.3 57.l 1.8 63-6 Reading Comprehension 19 30.4 60.4 1.9 69-6 Total Mathematics 19 54.2 67.4 2.4 80-7 Math: Problem Solving 19 36.0 68.l 2.6 80-7 Math: Procedures 19 18.2 62.4 2.3 72-6 Per ent In ach CONTENT CLUSTERS Number of Below Above ,. ___ Average Aver.age Avcraee Word Study Skills 36 0 42 58 Structural Analysis 12 5 37 58 Phonetic Analysis-Consonants 12 0 26 74 Phonetic Analysis-Vowels 12 0 47 53 Word Reading 30 5 63 32 Reading Comprehension 40 0 68 32 Two-Sentence Stories (Riddles) 5 0 53 47 Short Passages (Cloze) 15 5 53 42 Short Passages w/Questions 20 5 63 32 Recreational 10 21 58 21 Textual 5 II 37 53 Functional 5 5 74 21 Initial Understanding 9 0 79 21 Interpretation II II 53 37 Math: Problem Solving 44 0 37 63 Concepts/Whole No. Cornput. 3 0 47 53 Number Sense and Numeration 12 5 63 32 Geometry and Spatial Sense 5 0 32 68 Measurement 8 0 21 79 Statistics and Probability 5 II 37 53 Fraction and Decimal Concepts 3 0 68 32 Patterns \u0026amp; Relationships 5 II 37 53 Problem-Solving Strategies 3 0 26 74 Math: Procedures 25 5 53 42 Number Facts 8 5 58 37 Computation/Symbolic Notation II 5 58 37 Computation in Context 6 16 32 53 STANFORDLEVEUFORM/BATTERY: PRIMARY 1 / S / Full Length NORMS: Spring 1995 National Norms CONTENT CLUSTERS GROUP REPORT FOR BELWOOD ELEMENTARY National Grade Percentile Bands ,n on 0( Percent In ach Number of Below Above ltomo Aver.age Aven:c Aver.age Report ceaeraccd by READY REPORTS\"' Vuston 7..l..lJ for North Uttle Rock Sc..booOl istrfc:t Scores based oa. normative data copyricht ~ 1996 by Harcourt, lac. All rtcbts reserved. STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION ******************** GRADE: 01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 NORTH LITTLE ROCK-SPRii\"IG 200 RUN DA TE: 05/08/01 GENERAL POPULATION Total Reading 19 Word Study Skills 19 Word Reading 19 Reading Comprehension 19 Total Mathematics 19 Math: Problem Solving 19 Math: Procedures 19 PERFOR.'\\1ANCESTANDARDS 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 32 11 58 53 32 II 37 42 37 16 16 47 63 37 26 53 21 32 21 26 21 NOTES ST ANFORDLEVEUFORM/BA TTERY: PRIMARY 1 / S / Full Length NORMS: Spring 1995 National Norms GROUP REPORT with PERFO~~ANCESTANDARDSFOR BELWOOD ELEMENTARY Performance Standards are content-referenced scores that reflect what students know and should be able to do in given subject areas. The Stanford Performance Standards were determined by expert panels of educators, who judged each test question on the basis of how students at different levels of achievement should perform. These expert judgements yielded four categories or levels of student performance. Level I indicates little or no mastery of fundamental knowledge and skills. Level 2 denotes partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for satisfactory work. At the high school level, this is higher than minimum competency skills. Level 3 represents solid academic performance, indicating that students are prepared for the next grade. At the high school level, this indicates preparedness for democratic citizenship, responsible adulthood, and productive work. Level 4 signifies performance beyond grade level mastery. At the high school level, this shows readiness for rigorous college courses, advanced technical training, or employment requiring advanced academic achievement Report :cura1td by READYR El'ORTS'\"V' a-sioa 7.2.23 for Nortb Little Rock School Dlnrkt Scorc:t based on normadve data copyrlcht C 1996 by Harcourt. lac. All ricbts rac\"cd. STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION TEACHER: ****,.,******* GRADE: 02 SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEME:\"ITARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 DISTRJCT: GROUP: NORTH LITTLE ROCK-SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GENERAL POPULATION Mean Mean Median National SUBTESTS AND Number Raw National Grade lndiv rnrsrc, T-' \"- Nrt.' r_ .. ,. PJL\u0026lt;\nTotal Reading 26 85.0 59.4 3.5 67-6 Word Study Skills 27 34.5 53.3 2.8 56-5 Reading Vocabulary 26 21.8 58.9 3.6 66-6 Reading Comprehension 27 27.7 63.4 4.0 74-6 Total Mathematics 27 60.7 71.8 4.3 85-7 Math: Problem Solving 27 36.6 69.5 4.5 82-7 Math: Procedures 27 24.1 73.3 4.3 87-7 Percent In Each 11 CONTENT CLUSTERS Number of Below Above CONTENT CLUSTERS lfomo Aver2ge Average Avuage Word Study Skills 48 15 52 33 Structural Analysis 12 II 89 0 Phonetic Analysis-Consonants 18 II 48 41 Phonetic Analysis-Vowels 18 33 37 30 Reading Vocabulary 30 12 42 46 Synonyms 18 12 46 42 Context 6 4 38 58 Multiple Meanings 6 19 38 42 Reading Comprehension 40 15 26 59 Recreational 14 15 59 26 Textual 13 II 52 37 Functional 13 7 37 56 Initial Understanding 14 7 33 59 Interpretation 20 7 56 37 Critical Analysis 3 0 67 33 Process Strategies 3 19 59 22 Math: Problem Solving 46 7 33 59 Concepts/Whole No. Comput. 4 22 19 59 Number Sense and Numeration 10 4 30 67 Geometry and Spatial Sense 5 II 41 48 Measurement 10 4 41 56 Statistics and Probability 6 II 56 33 Fraction and Decimal Concepts 3 22 78 0 Panems \u0026amp; Relationships 5 15 44 41 Problem-Solving Strategies 3 4 44 52 Math: Procedures 28 0 44 56 Number Facts 8 4 26 70 Computation/Symbolic Notation 12 11 22 67 Computation in Context 8 7 30 63 STANFORDLEVEUFORM/BA TTERY: PRIMARY 2 / S / Full Length NORMS: Spring 1995 National Norms GROUP REPORT FOR BELWOOD ELEMENTARY National Grade Percentile Bands In \\II ~II 711 Oil Percent In Number of Below homo Averace Aver~e oc ach Above Average Rtport ::cmcratcdb y READY REPORTSTNV usioa 7.l.23 for North UUle Rock School District Scores ba.sffl on aonnadve data copyrtcht Cl 1996 by Han:oun. lnc. All rtchu raentd. STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION TEACHER: .. .. GRADE: 02 SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 NORTH LITTLE ROCK-SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GENERAL POPULATION DISTRICT: GROUP: SUBTESTS AND Number rnr ,, r To,\u0026lt;o,I Tomi Reading Word Study Skills Reading Vocabulary Reading Comprehension To1al Mathematics Math: Problem Solving Math: Procedures 26 27 26 27 27 27 27 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS I .,.1 1 12 15 12 15 4 7 7 Percent in Each I ---' , I ---' ~ 35 38 41 22 23 42 22 52 26 33 26 30 26 ll I- Id 15 22 23 II 37 37 56 NOTES STANFORDLEVEUFORM/BATTERYP:R IMARY2 / S / Full Length NORMS: Spring 1995 National Norms GROUP REPORT with PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR BELWOOD ELEMENTARY Performance S1andards are content-referenced scores that reflect what students know and should be able to do in given subject areas. The S1anford Performance S1andards were detennined by expen panels of educators, who judged each test question on the basis of how students at different levels of achievement should perform. These ex pen judgements yielded four categories or levels of student performance. Level I indicates little or no mastery of fundamen1al knowledge and skills. Level 2 denotes partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamen1al for satisfactory work. At the high school level, this is higher than minimum competency skills. Level 3 represents solid academic performance, indicating that students are prepared for the next grade. At the high school level, this indicates preparedness for democratic citizenship, responsible adulthood, and productive work. Level 4 signifies performance beyond grade level mastery. At the high school level, this shows readiness for rigorous college courses, advanced technical training, or employment requiring advanced academic achievement Report :menlcd by READY REPORTS\"'I Version 7.2.13 for North Uttle Rock School Dlsrrtd Scores based on normative data copyrl:bt O 1996 by Harcourt. lac. All rlchts rnttVM- STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION GROUP REPORT TEACHER: ********* GRADE: 03 FOR SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY - TEST DATE: 04/16/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK - SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GROUP: GENERAL POPULATION Mean Mean Median National National Grade Percentile Bands SUBTESTS AND Number Raw National Grade lndiv TnT,\nf\u0026lt;: Tester! C:rn.o NrJ. J.-' PD_S 11 10 10 'iO 70 go QO Total Reading 16 49.4 43.0 3.4 37-4 Reading Vocabulary 16 18.1 40.8 3.0 33-4 Reading Comprehension 16 31.4 45.7 3.4 42-5 Total Mathematics 16 45.1 43.5 3.4 38-4 Math: Problem Solving 16 28.6 45.I 3.3 41-5 Math: Procedures 16 16.6 45.0 3.4 41-5 Language 16 24.4 45.2 3.3 41-5 Spelling 16 17.8 47.7 3.4 46-5 Science 16 20.5 39.0 2.2 30-4 Social Science 16 18.2 41.8 2.9 35-4 Listening 16 22.4 42.l 3.1 35-4 Using Information 16 23.8 37.5 2.7 28-4 Thinking Skills 16 103.0 41.3 2.9 34-4 Basic Battery 16 159.2 44.5 3.4 40-5 Complete Battery 16 197.9 43.6 3.4 38-4 Percent In ach Percent In ach CONTENT CLUSTERS Number of Below Above CONTENT CLUSTERS Number of Below Above !tom\u0026lt; Average Averge Average JtPm\u0026lt; Average Avenge Avenge Reading Vocabulary 30 31 63 6 Spelling 30 19 69 13 Synonyms 18 38 56 6 Sight Words 5 6 50 44 Context 6 31 56 13 Phonetic Principles 12 19 81 0 Multiple Meanings 6 38 63 0 Structural Principles 8 13 75 13 No Mistake 5 38 31 31 Reading Comprehension 54 31 63 6 Recreational 18 31 50 19 Science 40 38 56 6 Textual 18 38 50 13 Earth \u0026amp; Space Science 12 19 81 0 Functional 18 31 56 13 Physical Science 14 38 56 6 Initial Understanding 14 13 88 0 Life Science 14 63 25 13 Interpretation 24 38 50 13 Science Process Skills 30 56 44 0 Critical Analysis 8 13 69 19 Process Strategies 8 38 56 6 Social Science 40 31 63 6 History 9 25 63 13 Math: Problem Solving 46 19 69 13 Geography 10 38 56 6 Concepts/Whole No. Comput. 4 13 81 6 Civics \u0026amp; Government 8 19 81 0 Number Sense and Numeration 6 38 38 25 Econolnics 8 25 63 13 Geometry and Spatial Sense 6 56 25 19 Culture 5 19 69 13 Measurement 10 38 50 13 Statistics and Probability 6 25 56 19 Listening 40 25 69 6 Fraction and Decimal Concepts 4 13 75 13 Vocabulary 10 19 81 0 Patterns \u0026amp; Relationships 3 13 88 0 Comprehension 30 25 56 19 Estimation 3 13 88 0 Recreational 10 31 56 13 Problem-Solving Strategies 4 25 69 6 Informational 10 38 38 25 Functional 10 31 44 25 Math: Procedures 30 25 69 6 Initial Understanding 12 25 56 19 Number Facts 6 6 81 13 Interpretation 18 31 50 19 Computation/Symbolic Notation 12 19 75 6 Computation in Context 9 38 50 13 Using Information 47 44 56 0 Rounding 3 31 63 6 Thinking Skills 191 31 63 6 Language 48 25 69 6 - Capitalization 6 19 56 25 Punctuation 6 31 56 13 Usage 6 19 56 25 Sentence Structure 10 44 50 6 Content and Organization 10 31 50 19 \"\"\" \u0026lt;\n1,\n11. 1() ,, ,\ng ,\nSTANFORDLEVEUFORM/BA TTERY: PRIMARY 3 / S / Full Length Report genenced by READY REPORTSTM Version 7.l.23 for NORMS: Period 15 1995 National Norms North Little Rock School Dlrtrld Scores based on normtlve data c:apyrlght (0 1996 by Harcourt. Inc. AU rlchts reserved. STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CERTIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 23 Ref, STDF03 MBR, NLRSDOl Staff Development By Topic Location 45 Belwood Elementary ~ Topic Description Date 21004 FRESH LOOK AT NUMBERS 7/06/00 21006 GETTING SMARTER 7/10/00 21015 CONGITIVE \u0026amp; AFFECTIVE CURRICULUM 8/01/00 21020 SPECIAL ED SPECIAL SHOW 8/04/00 21021 SPECIAL ED SPECIAL SHOW 8/03/00 21022 PATHWISE MENTORING 7/24/00 21025 SENSORY INTEGRATION 8/04/00 21026 GETTING STARTED NYNAVOX 7/06/00 21049 SPECIAL ED READING COMMITTEE 8/10/00 21058 EFFECTIVE LITERACY FOLLOW-UP 7/12/00 21065 TEN MINUTE MATH 10/25/00 21092 WRITING ON DEMAND-NOVA 5/10/01 as of 10/16/01 Page I-----ADMINISTRATORS----I-------CERTIFIED-------1------CLASSIFIED-------I 1----MALE--- ---FEMALE--1----MALE--- ---FEMALE--1----MALE--- ---FEMALE--1 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 B w 0 1 1 Belwood Certified Staff Development School \u0026amp; Workplace Safety Expectation for Reading, Math, Social Studies, Science Technology Writing on Demand Reading/Writing Program Teacher Evaluation Smart Start Goals \u0026amp; Strategies COE \u0026amp;ACSIP Flexible Grouping Writer's Workshop Writing Process Writing Prompts and Rubrics Character-Centered Teaching SAT-9 Test Preparation SAT-9 Test Administration Alternative Portfolio Assessment Physical Agent Modalities Training Mathematics CPR Meaningful Mathematics Grant lnservices including - Analysis of Test Scores and Test Items Alignment of Curriculum Curriculum Development Classroom Management Early Literacy Environment Early Prevention of School Failure Training New Teacher Orientation Desegregation Training Effective Literacy Developing a Differentiated Curriculum for GT Reading Strategies That Work STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CLASSIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 24 Belwood Classified Staff Development School \u0026amp; Workplace Safety Expectation for Reading, Math, Social Studies, Science Technology Teacher Evaluation Smart Start Goals \u0026amp; Strategies COE \u0026amp;ACSIP Character-Centered Teaching SA T-9 Test Preparation SAT-9 Test Administration CPR Classroom Management Desegregation Training ,, DISCIPLINE INFORMATION REFERRALS/ ACTIONS TAKEN (PLEASE ATTACH COMPUTER GENERATED INFORMATION) Page 25 Ref, DIS013 Disciplinary Referral Summary By FILE YEAR, NLRSD0l 10/16/01 CUMULATIVE Action Taken BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - - - - - - -TOTAL- - - - - - - - - ---- --BLACK-- - - - - - - -----NON-BLACK------ C-escription===================Total=Pct=Par.Con===Total==Pct=Par=Con===Total=Pct=Par=Con 01 Conference with Student ACTIONS 13 21.31% 13 9 14.75% 4 6.55% 4 STUDENTS 13 25.49% 13 9 17. 64% 9 4 7. 84% 4 02 Conference with Parent ACTIONS 1 1.63% 1 1.63% 1 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 1. 96% l 1.96% 0 .00% 0 03 Conference with Student and Parent ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 04 Privileges Denied ACTIONS 16 26.22% 16 15 24.59% 15 1.63% l STUDENTS 12 23.52% 12 11 21. 56% 11 1 1.96% l 05 Behavior Contract ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00%- 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 06 Detention Hall ACTIONS 10 16.39% 10 7 11 .47% 7 4.91% 3 STUDENTS 8 15.68% 5 9.80% 5 5.88% 3 07 Student Will Make Up Time ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 08 Student Placed on Probation ACTIONS 4 6.55% 4 4.91% 1.63% l STUDENTS 7.84% 4 5. 88% 3 1.96% l 09 Student Assignment Class (SAC) ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00\\ 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 10 Home Suspension ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 . 00% 0 11 Boys/Girls Club Suspension ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% G 0 .00% 0 12 Alt School Susp (K-6) ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 1-S Suspension ACTIONS 1 .63% 1 1. 63% 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS l 1.96% 1 1.96% l .00\\ 0 14 Saturday School ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS .00% 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 15 Recommended Expulsion ACTIONS .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00\\ 16 Other ACTIONS 16 26.22\\- 16 15 24.59% 15 l .63% l STUDENTS 12 23.52% 12 11 21.56% 11 l .96% l 17 Expulsions ACTIONS 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 0 .00% 0 STUDENTS .00% 0 0 .00% 0 .00% TOTAL ACTIONS 61 61 51 83. 60% 51 10 16.39\\- 10 STUDENTS 51 51 41 80. 39% 41 10 19.60% 10 Ref, DIS012 CUMULATIVE Disciplinary Referral Summary By Referral Reason FILE YEAR, NLRSDOl Page 18 10/16/01 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Code Description -------TOTAL---------------BLACK-------------NON-BLACK------ Cl-regard for directions of teachers or administrators. 02 Disregard for directions of bus drivers, lunch aides, or other authorized school personnel. 03 Disruption and/or interference with the normal and orderly conduct of school \u0026amp; school-sponsored activities. 04 Behavior that involves indecent and/or immoral acts. OS Wagering or any form of gambling. 06 Physical abuse, assault, insult or threatened physical abuse to a school employee. REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 07 Physical abuse, assault, insult, or threatened physical abuse to REF another student or any other individual. 08 Possession of a (l)knife, (2)razor, (3)ice pick, (4) explosive, STU REF (S)pistol, (6)rifle, (?)shotgun, (B)pellet gun, (9)mace, (lO)tear gas, STU (ll)pepper spray, or (12) any other object that can be considered a weapon or dangerous instrument. 09 Possession of alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined REF by Arkansas law or School Board PolicY\nor using, under the influence, offering for sale or selling alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined by Arkansas law or Board policy. STU 10 Destruction of or the ~ttempt to destroy school property. REF STU 11 Stealing or the attempt to st~al school property or the property REF belonging to another individual. 1-ating or copying the work of another student. 13 Failure to abide by attendance rules. 14 Excessive tardiness to class (Secondary use only). 15 Use of profanity, vulgar language or obscene gestures. 16 Committing extortion, coercion, blackmail or forcing another person to act through the use of force or threat of force. STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 17 Engaging in verbal abuses such as name-calling, ethnic or racial REF slurs, or using derogatory statements to other students, school personnel or other individuals. 18 Hazing. 19 Gang related activities. 20 Sexual harassment. 21 Smoking and/or possession of any tobacco and/or tobacco product paraphernalia. 22 Possession of any paging device, beeper, mobile/cellular telephone or similar electronic communication device. STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU TOTAL REF STU Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con Total Pct Par Con 13 21.31% 10 21.73%- 2 . 27% 4. 34 % 31 SO.SH 20 43.47% .00% .00% 1.63% 2 2 0 0 61 46 2.17% 3 .27\\ 4.34% 9. 83% 10.BH 1.63% 2.17\\.00% .00% .00% .00% 1.63% 2 .17% .00% .00% 4.91% 6.52% .00% .00% .00% 1.63% 2.17% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% 13 10 2 31 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 46 9 14.75% 13. 04% 2 .27% 4.34% 26 42.62% 15 32.60% .00% .00% 1.63% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 .17% .27% 4. 34% 9.83% 10.86% .00% .00% .00% .00% 1.63% 2.17% . 00%.00% .00% .00% 1.63% 2.17% .00%.00% 3 .27% 4. 34%. 00% .00% . 00%. 00%- 1.63% 2.17\\- 00%. 00% .00% .00% .00% .00%' .00% .00% 51 83.60% 36 78. 2H 6 2 2 26 15 2 6 5 0 0 2 2 0 0 51 36 4 4 6.55% 8.69% .00% .00% 5 8.19% 5 10.86% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% . 00\\. 00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% 1.63% 2.17% .00% .00% .00% . 00%. 00% .00%' .00% .00% . 00%- 10 16.39% 10 21.73% 4 4 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 44 Ref: DIS032S Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Date: 9/10/01 by School :::.: 16:06:11 From AUGUST ::w,ol: 045 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Through JUNE ==------------------------------------------------------------=-=-=-============ 1 9 9 9 - 0 0 ====------------=====-----------------===============-----====================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------======--=================------==================== 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. 11 BOYS CLUB 12 E. I. C. 17 EXPULSION 0 0~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 5 62.5%- 1 12.5%- 5 1 0 0 ~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 05?- 0 0 0 5?- 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 - 0 1 -----BM-----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF-----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0~ 0 0 2 25.0% 2 0 0~ 0 0 1 0~ 0 0 1 100.0% 1 -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0~ 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 05?- 0 0 -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 - ,==~======================================================================== ~.A.C. 0 .0%- 0 .0%- 0 .0% 0 .0%- 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 0 .0%- 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB O .0%- 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C O .0%- 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0%- 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION O .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON ---------------------------------------------=================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 5- 100.0-% 1- 100.0-% 2- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 8- 5- 1- 2- 0 8- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 .0 % 0 . 0 %- 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 ~EXPULSION 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 1- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 1- 0 0 1- 0 1- \" COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOMES EVALUATION (COE) SURVEY RES UL TS (IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE INSERT AFTER THIS PAGE) ANNUAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE INSERT AFTER THIS PAGE) ,, School Improvement Plan Belwood Elementary is in the first year of its new ACSIP Cycle. The staff are in the process of analyzing data, reviewing and revising the mission statement, mapping curriculum, and setting goals for achievement in two priority areas: literacy and mathematics. Benchmarks will be created and interventions developed to bring about increased student achievement in those areas. We continue to practice those Smart Start Goals and Strategies, which have been in place since June, 1999 (attached). - Belwood Elementary School DATA-DRIVEN DECISION MAKING Record and Reflect - March, 1999 Revised - 6121199 NEEDS ANALYSIS Open Response/Writing Math Procedures Language Reading vocabulary Disparity between MB/WM in math anci1eading Problem Solving GOAL SELECTION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. By May 2000, the number of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels on the grade 4 Mathematics Benchmark Exam will increase by 10%. By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on the SA T--9 in the Language area will increase by 6%. By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on the SA T-9 in Reading Vocabulary will increase by 7%. By May 2000, scores of black males will increase in Reading by 10% as measured by state/district-approved standardized tests. By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on the SA T-9 in Problem Solving will increase by 6%. GOALS AND STRATEGIES Goal 1 - By May 2000, the number of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels on the grade 4 Mathematics Benchmark Exam will increase by 6%. Strategy 1 - Provide a Problem of the Day: Utilize problem solving strategies With an open response format Strategy 2 - Utilize flexible grouping based on strengths and weaknesses: math and writing skills Strategy 3 - Set class goals for each performance assessment task in math and if not met students will edit and revise incorrect/incomplete classwork until it is of an acceptable level (involves reteach and reassess) Strategy 4 - Require memorization of number facts along wfth timed drills to increase computation proficiency Strategy 5 - Provide distributive practice daily on previously taught skills .:. Goal 2 - By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on SA T-9 in the Language area wiff increase by 6%. Strategy 1 - Teach writing skiffs from Quick Notes, daily Strategy 2 - Identify and target students for flexible group instruction on specific language skills Strategy 3 - Teach students that written expression is an integral part of communication and editing and revision are vital to the process Strategy 4 - Teach the 4 basic formats of non-fiction writing Strategy 5 - Post editing and revising checklists in each classroom and hold students accountable for application of skiffs previously taught Strategy 6- Teach students how to evaluate their own writing based upon the Arkansas State Writing Rubric Goal 3 - By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on the SA T-9 in Reading Vocabulary wilf increase by 7.%. Strategy 1 - Require the use of new vocabulary in writing activities Strategy 2 - Increase the use of activities relating to words at a/f grade levels Strategy 3 - Establish weekly vocabulary tl3sts Strategy 4 - Engage students in \"word of the weekn activities, daily Strategy 5 - Teach new vocabulary through the use of creative learning games Goal 4 - By May 2000, scores of black males will increase in reading by 10% as measured by state/district-approved standardized tests. Strategy 1 - Increase the use of flexible grouping in literacy at a/f grade levels as indicated by on-going assessment Strategy 2- Teach, model, and post reading strategies in each classroom and hold students accountable for application of what has been taught Strategy 3 - Involve targeted students in a weekly literature club to build interest, time spent reading, reading vocabulary, and comprehension skills Strategy 4 - Assess the availability of high interest/appropriate level reading materials for black males in order to purchase as needed Strategy 5 - Write for a variety of purposes (persuade, enjoy, entertain, inform, record, etc.) with the use of a concrete scoring guide, in response to reading Goal 5 - By May 2000, the number of students scoring average and above average on the SA T-9 in Problem Solving will increase by 6%. Strategy 1 - Teach, model, and post the plan for problem solving at all grade levels Strategy 2 - Administer problem solving performance assessment tasks on a weekly basis Strategy 3 - Analyze the problem of the day and share open responses Strategy 4 - Increase the use of pattern and relationship exercises and require openended responses Strategy 5- Teach and post strategies for problem s_olving 2 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2001-2002 SCHOOL PROFILE School: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY Grade: PRE-K-FIFTH GRADE Principal: MAVIS CHERRY Race/Gender: B/F Assistant Principal: LORETTA HASSLE Race/Gender: W/F Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Secretary: BRENDA HOLT Race/Gender: W/F Secretary: LATONYA CLARK Race/Gender: B/F Staff Staff Changes S CH O O L P '0 FIL E Table of Contents Staff Attendance (Certified) Staff Attendance (Classified) School Enrollment Elementary Secondary Special Programs Special Education Four Year Comparison Class Enrollment (Elementary) Course Enrollment (Secondary) Extended Educational Programs School/District lntitiated Honors and Awards Committee/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities Tryout Information Student Attendance (After Nine Weeks) Students Retained Subject Area Courses Failed (Secondary) Graduation Information Dropout Statistics (Previous Semester) Achievement/Assessment Data Staff Development Update (Certified) Staff Development Update (Classified) Discipline Information (After Nine Weeks) Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation (COE) Survey Results Annual School Improvement Plan *INFORM AT/ON TO BE FURNISHED BY COMPUTER SERVICES Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2001-2002 FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER --WHITE BLACK OTHER ~ M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS 1 1 2 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 19 4 24 SPEC EDUC TEACHERS 1 1 2 1 1 MEDIA SPECIALISTS 1 1 GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST 1 1 COUNSELORS 1 1 READING RECOVERY 2 2 1 1 LITERACY COACH 1 1 MATH COOPERATING 1 1 !TOTAL CERTIFIED 34! TEACHER AIDES 2 1 3 CLERICAL STAFF 1 1 2 SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS 1 2 3 CAFETERIA WORKERS 4 4 COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES 4 4 8 4 4 8 CROSSING GUARDS 2 2 4 INTERVENTION AIDE 1 1 PARENT COORDINATOR 1 1 !TOTAL CLASSIFIED 11 I 21 sl 121 Page 1 SCHOOL: sr.\"= (CHANGES AFTER OCTOBER) FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER Ji]llll WHITE BLACK OTHER ,,,, \" M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SPEC EDUC TEACHERS MEDIA SPECIALISTS GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST COUNSELORS !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES CLERICAL STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS CAFETERIA WORKERS COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES CROSSING GUARDS !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page2 CERTIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page3 Ref: ABS010 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Certified Staff Absences PAGE 3 Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male 8 26 2 by Race and Sex School 33 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY K-6 3.5 34.0 1.0 7-8 9-10 11-12 Other CLASSIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page4 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Race I Gender Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male Classified Staff Absences PAGE 4 by Race and Sex School 33 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY Tot-Emp K-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Other 14 32.0 3 5.0 15 48.5 SCHOOL: GRADE ti WHITE LEVEL ::t:l M F # PRE- K % # 3 3 KINDERGARTEN % 4% 4% # 4 1 FIRST % 5% 1% # 4 3 SECOND % 6% 4% # 2 THIRD % 4% # 5 3 FOURTH % 7% 4% # 1 4 FIFTH % 2% 6% TOTAL # 17 16 GRADES1 -5 % 4% 4% ELEME,ARY SCHOOLE NROLLMENT TOTAL BLACK TOTAL WHITE M F BLACK 0 0 6 28 41 69 8% 36% 53% 90% 5 26 43 69 7% 35% 58% 93% 7 30 33 63 10% 42% 46% 89% 2 28 27 55 4% 49% 47% 96% 8 36 25 61 12% 52% 36% 88% 5 24 37 61 8% 36% 56% 92% 33 172 206 378 8% 42% 50% 91% OTHER TOTAL M F OTHER TOTAL 0 0 1 1 2 77 1% 1% 3% 0 74 1 1 71 1% 1% 0 57 0 69 0 66 1 2 3 414 0% 0% 1% Page 5 TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN SPECIAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: 2001-2002 HD WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAMS ::::::: M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # 0 0 0 6 9 15 0 0 0 15 GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED % 40% 60% 100% # 0 0 0 4 5 9 0 0 0 9 SOAR-TD-SUCCESS % 44% 56% 100% # 0 1 1 6 4 10 0 0 0 11 EARLY SUCCESS % 9% 9% 55% 36% 91% # 2 0 2 16 15 31 1 2 3 36 PRE-Kl NDERGARTEN % 6% 6% 44% 42% 86% 3% 6% 8% # 1 1 9 7 16 17 LAP % 6% 6% 53% 41% 94% # 1 1 2 22 31 53 0 0 0 55 READING RECOVERY % 2% 2% 4% 40% 56% 96% # % # % ,_,i.:i\n# % # % # % l','\"i:!t''i!r, # % ' # % Page 7 SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL: PLACEMENT WHITE TOTAL BLACK M F WHITE M F RESOURCE ROOM # 0 0 0 3 PLACEMENT M.R. % 100% RESOURCE ROOM # 0 0 9 6 PLACEMENT L.D. % 60% 40% # SELF-CONTAINED % # 2 2 4 14 19 SPEECH % 5% 5% 11% 38% 51% TRANSITION - BA - # SELF-CONTAINED % # RESOURSE ROOM/MH % # 0 0 3 5 RESOURSE ROOM/OHi % 38% 63% # RESOURSE ROOM 504 % # RESOURSE ROOM SEO % # % PLACEMENT IS DETERMINED BY PRIMARY HANDICAPPING CONDITION There is a District Self-Contained Unit on this campus 2001-2002 TOTAL OTHER TOTAL-BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL 3 0 0 3 100% 15 0 0 15 100% 33 0 0 37 89% 8 8 100% Yes No (Circle one) Page 8 SCHOOL: FOUR YEAR ENROL!ENT COMPARISON OCTOBER 1 DAT A (USED TO DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE ENROLLMENT RANGES) STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS BLACK AND NON-BLACK INCLUDING KINDERGARTEN EXCLUDING KINDERGARTEN BLACK 374 BLACK 305 WHITE 30 WHITE 25 2001-2002 OTHER 3 2001-2002 OTHER 1 TOTAL 407 TOTAL 331 % BLACK 91.89% % BLACK 92.15% BLACK 372 BLACK 297 WHITE 37 WHITE 28 2000-2001 OTHER 2 2000-2001 OTHER 2 TOTAL 411 TOTAL 327 % BLACK 90.51% % BLACK 90.83% BLACK 396 BLACK 332 WHITE 43 WHITE 34 1999-2000 OTHER 7 1999-2000 OTHER 5 TOTAL 446 TOTAL 371 % BLACK 88.79% % BLACK 89.49% BLACK 393 BLACK 286 WHITE 61 WHITE 43 1998-1999 OTHER 10 1998-1999 OTHER 6 TOTAL 464 TOTAL 335 % BLACK 84.70% % BLACK 85.37% Page9 SCHOOL: TEACHER'S NAME TOTAL: CLASS ENROLLMENT 2001!02 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE Page 10 SCHOOL: TEACHER'S NAME TOTAL: CLASS ENROLLMENT (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) TEACHER GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE 2001-2002 CLASS ENROLLMENT \\ Page 10a ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 1 ate: 10/15/01 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: 15:53:59 Teacher -White- -Black- -Oth?r-eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot I.Y 1 AR101 1 ART F w 2 7 9 18 ORTNER 1 AR101 5 ART F l.J 6 11 17 IBEE 1 AR101 6 ART F L.J 2 4 12 18 ESSLER 1 AR101 7 ART F l.J i 9 8 i8 AR101 ART 4 1 26 40 71 MITH 1 AR201 8 ART F w 2 11 4 i 18 ANNING 1 AR201 9 ART F w 1 6 9 16 ILLIAMS 1 AR20i 10 ART F B 3 i 7 6 17 TOLL 1 AR201 20 ART F l.J 5 13 18 AR201 ART 3 4 29 32 i 69 AVER 1 AR301 21 ART F w 8 10 18 EGNOCHE 1 AR301 22 ART F L.J 2 8 7 i7 LLIS 1 AR301 23 ART F B 10 9 19 AR301 ART 2 26 26 54 ENNETT 1 AR401 25 ART F w 2 1 11 9 '-.-:-J\"'\" ' HAMBERLAIN 1 AR401 26 ART M w 2 15 6 23 ass 1 AR401 27 ART F w 1 1 10 11 23 AR401 ART 5 .,\n:.. 36 26 69 ARRINGTON 1 AR501 30 ART F B 1 12 8 21 OPELAND 1 AR501 31 ART F w 1 1 4 15 ::Z1\n!WR 1 AR501 32 ART F w 2 6 14 22 AR501 ART 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 i 327 IILSEY 1 EN101 1 ENGLISH F w 2 7 9 18 'ORTNER 1 ENiOi 5 ENGLISH F w 6 ii 17 1IBEE 1 EN10i 6 ENGLISH F w 2 4 12 18 .ESSLER 1 EN101 7 ENGLISH F w 1 9 8 18 EN10i ENGLISH 4 1 26 40 71 1MITH 1 EN201 8 ENGLISH F w 2 11 4 1 18 IANNING 1 EN201 9 ENGLISH F w 1 6 9 16 iILLIAMS 1 EN201 10 ENGLISH F B 3 1 7 6 17 ,TOLL 1 EN201 20 ENGLISH F w 5 13 18 EN201 ENGLISH 3 4 29 32 1 69 !AVER 1 EN301 21 ENGLISH F w 8 10 18 1EGNOCHE 1 EN301 22 ENGLISH F w 2 8 7 17 :LLIS 1 EN301 23 ENGLISH F B 10 9 19 EN301 ENGLISH 2 26 26 54 !ENNETT 1 EN401 25 ENGLISH F l.J 2 1 11 9 '~.:-.J.':\"1'\nHAMBERLAIN 1 EN401 26 ENGLISH M w 2 15 6 23\noss 1 EN401 27 ENGLISH F w 1 1 10 11 23 EN401 ENGLISH 5 2 36 26 69 lA-INGTON 1 EN501 30 ENGLISH F B 1 12 8 21\nOPELAND i EN50i 31 ENGLISH F w i i 4 15 .-\n.\nC..L ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 2 ate: 10/15/01 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: 15: 54:00 Teacher -l.Jhite- -Black- -Other-eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot I!IR 1 EN501 32 ENGLISH F w 2 6 14 22 EN501 ENGLISH 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 UFFIE 1 GJ 29 GRADE PRE-K F w 2 16 15 1 2 36 GJ GRADE PRE-K 2 16 15 1 2 36 DEPT TOTALS 2 16 15 1 2 36 IERCE 1 GK 2 GRADE K F l.J 1 1 6 6 14 ATTLES 1 GK 3 GRADE K F B 5 9 1 15 OTTRELL 1 GK 4 GRADE K F w 1 6 8 1 16 OUTHWELL 1 GK 48 GRADE K F w 1 6 9 16 10USE 1 GK 49 GRADE K F w 1 5 9 15 GK GRADE K 3 2 28 41 1 i 76 DEPT TOTALS 3 ,, 28 41 1 1 76 c:. IILSEY 1 G1 1 GRADE 01 F w 2 7 9 18 'ORTNER 1 G1 5 GRADE 01 F w 6 11 17 1IBEE 1 G1 6 GRADE 01 F w ., 4 12 18 C. .ESSLER 1 G1 7 GRADE 01 F w 1 9 8 18 G1 GRADE 01 4 1 26 40 71 - DEPT TOTALS 4 1 26 40 71 ,MITH 1 G2 8 GRADE 02 F w 2 11 4. 1 18 !ANNING 1 G2 9 GRADE 02 F l.J 1 6 9 16 I ILL IAMS 1 G2 10 GRADE 02 F B 3 1 7 6 17 .TOLL 1 G2 20 GRADE 02 F w 5 13 18 G2 GRADE 02 3 4 29 32 i 69 DEPT TOTALS 3 4 29 32 1 69 JAVER 1 G3 21 GRADE 03 F w 8 10 18 iEGNOCHE 1 G3 22 GRADE 03 F l.J c.:.. 8 7 17 :LLIS 1 G3 23 GRADE 03 F B 10 9 19 G3 GRADE 03 2 26 26 54 DEPT TOTALS ,, c:. 26 26 54 !ENNETT 1 G4 25 GRADE 04 F w 2 1 11 9 23 :HAMBERLAIN 1 G4 26 GRADE 04 M l.J 2 15 6 23 \\oss 1 G4 27 GRADE 04 F l.J 1 1 10 11 23 G4 GRADE 04 5 2 36 26 69 DEPT TOTALS 5 2 36 26 69 .JARRINGTON 1 G5 30 GRADE 05 F B 1 12 8 21 :.AND 1 G5 31 GRADE 05 F l.J 1 1 4 15 21 11 R 1 G5 32 GRADE 05 F w 2 6 14 22 G5 GRADE 05 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 1 4 22 37 64 ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 3 ate: 10/15/01 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: 15:54:01 Teacher -1,Jh i te- -Black- -Other-eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot I~Y 1 HL101 1 HEALTH F w ..., C. 7 9 18 ORTNER 1 HL101 5 HEALTH F w 6 11 17 IBEE 1 HL101 6 HEALTH F w ~, C. 4 12 18 ESSLER 1 HL101 7 HEALTH F w 1 9 8 18 HL101 HEALTH 4 1 26 40 71 MITH 1 HL201 8 HEALTH F w 2 11 4 1 18 ANNING 1 HL201 9 HEALTH F w 1 6 9 16 ILLIAMS 1 HL201 10 HEALTH F B 3 1 7 6 17 TOLL 1 HL201 20 HEALTH F w 5 13 18 HL201 HEALTH 3 4 29 32 1 69 AVER 1 HL301 21 HEALTH F w 8 10 18 EGNOCHE 1 HL301 22 HEALTH F w 2 8 7 17 LLIS 1 HL301 23 HEALTH F B 10 9 19 HL301 HEALTH 2 26 ...,, c..(:) 54 ENNETT 1 HL401 25 HEALTH F l,J 2 1 11 9 23 HAMBERLAIN 1 HL401 26 HEALTH M w 2 15 6 23 oss 1 HL401 27 HEALTH F !,J 1 1 10 11 -,~ ,:.,.j HL401 HEALTH 5 2 36 26 69 !ARRINGTON 1 HL501 30 HEALTH F B 1 12 8 21 OPELAND 1 HL501 31 HEALTH F w 1 1 4 15 21 II.R 1 HL501 32 HEALTH F !,J 2 6 14 -,~, ,:\n..,:-_ HL501 HEALTH 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 IILSEY 1 HN101 1 HANDWRITING F w 2 7 9 18 ORTNER 1 HN101 5 HANDWRITING F w 6 11 17 1IBEE 1 HN101 6 HANDWRITING F w 2 4 12 18 .ESSLER 1 HN101 7 HANDWRITING F w 1 9 8 18 HN101 HANDWRITING 4 1 26 40 71 iMITH 1 HN201 8 HANDWRITING F w 2 11 4 .'. . 18 IANNING 1 HN201 9 HANDWRITING F w 1 6 9 16 JILLI AMS 1 HN201 10 HANDWRITING F B 3 1 7 6 17 \u0026gt;TOLL 1 HN201 20 HANDWRITING F w 5 13 18 HN201 HANDWRITING 3 4 29 32 1 69 !AVER 1 HN301 21 HANDWRITING F w 8 10 18 IEGNOCHE 1 HN301 22 HANDWRITING F w 2 8 7 17 :LLIS 1 HN301 23 HANDWRITING F B 10 9 19 HN301 HANDWRITING 2 26 26 54 !ENNETT 1 HN401 25 HANDWRITING F w 2 1 11 9 23 :HAMBERLAIN 1 HN401 26 HANDWRITING M w 2 15 6 23 lOSS 1 HN401 27 HANDWRITING F w 1 1 10 11 23 HN401 HANDWRITING 5 2 36 26 69 iA-NGTON 1 HN501 30 HANDWRITING F B .'. . 12 8 21 :OPELAND 1 HN501 31 HANDWRITING F w 1 1 4 15 21 ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 4 ate: 10/15/01 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: i5:54:0i Teacher -i.Jhite- -Black- -Other-eacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot iI.R 1 HN501 32 HANDWRITING F w 2 6 14 \"\"'-'\"~' HN50i HANDWRITING i 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 IILSEY 1 MA101 1 MATH F w 2 7 9 18 'ORTNER 1 MA10i 5 MATH F i-.i 6 ii 17 IBEE i MAiOi 6 MATH F w 2 4 i2 i8 .ESSLER 1 MA101 7 MATH F w 1 9 8 18 MA101 MATH 4 1 26 40 71 ,MITH 1 MA201 8 MATH F w 2 11 4 1 18 !ANNING 1 MA201 9 MATH F l.J 1 6 9 16 II LL IAMS 1 MA201 10 MATH F B 3 1 7 6 17 ,TOLL 1 MA201 20 MATH F w 5 13 18 MA201 MATH 3 4 29 32 1 69 !AVER 1 MA301 21 MATH F w 8 10 18 -EGNOCHE 1 MA301 22 MATH F l.J 2 8 7 17 :LLIS 1 MA301 23 MATH F B 10 9 19 MA301 MATH 2 26 26 54 :ENNETT 1 MA401 25 MATH F w 2 1 11 9 ',:\",.'-\":, HAMBERLAIN 1 MA401 26 MATH M w 2 15 6 23 1 MA401 27 MATH F w 1 1 10 11 23 MA401 MATH 5 2 36 26 69 !ARRINGTON 1 MA501 30 MATH F B 1 12 8 21 :OPELAND 1 MA501 31 MATH F w 1 1 4 15 21 iILLER i MA501 32 MATH F l.J 2 6 14 22 MA501 MATH 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 IILSEY 1 MU101 1 MUSIC F w 2 7 9 18 \"ORTNER 1 MU101 5 MUSIC F w 6 11 17 \u0026gt;IBEE 1 MU101 6 MUSIC F w 2 4 12 18 ,ESSLER 1 MU101 7 MUSIC F l.J 1 9 8 18 MU101 MUSIC 4 1 26 40 71 \\MITH 1 MU201 8 MUSIC F w 2 11 4 1 18 !ANNING 1 MU201 9 MUSIC F l.J 1 6 9 16 IILLIAMS 1 MU201 10 MUSIC F B 3 1 7 6 a --, J. I ,TOLL 1 MU201 20 MUSIC F w 5 13 18 MU201 MUSIC 3 4 29 32 i 69 lAVER 1 MU301 21 MUSIC F w 8 10 18 iEGNOCHE i MU30i 22 MUSIC F w ., \"'- 8 7 17 :LLIS i MU30i 23 MUSIC F B iO 9 19 MU30i MUSIC 2 26 26 54 IE.TT 1 MU401 25 MUSIC F l.J 2 1 11 9 23 '.HAMBERLAIN i MU401 26 MUSIC M w 2 i5 6 .,.~3 ~-..I ~ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page C~. Date: 10/15/01 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL\n1me: 15: 54:02 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- Teacher Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot ~ 1 MU401 27 MUSIC- F w 1 1 10 11 23 MU401 MUSIC 5 2 36 26 69 -!ARRINGTON 1 MU501 30 MUSIC F B 1 12 8 21 :::PELAND 1 MU501 31 MUSIC F w 1 1 4 15 21 1ILLER 1 MU501 32 MUSIC F 1,J 2 6 14 22 MU501 MUSIC 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 ,.J!LSEY 1 PE101 1 PHYS ED F w c.... ., 7 9 18\n-ORTNER 1 PE101 5 PHYS ED F 1,J 6 11 17 )IBEE 1 PE101 6 PHYS ED F w c.... ., 4 12 18 ~ESSLER 1 PE101 7 PHYS ED F w 1 9 8 18 PE101 PHYS ED 4 1 26 40 71 3MITH 1 PE201 8 PHYS ED F w 2 11 4 it 18 1ANNING 1 PE201 9 PHYS ED F w 1 6 9 16 ,.JILLIAMS 1 PE201 10 PHYS ED F B 3 1 7 6 17 3TOLL 1 PE201 20 PHYS ED F w 5 13 18 PE201 PHYS ED 3 4 29 32 l t.:,.9 -iAVER 1 PE301 21 PHYS ED F w 8 10 18 3EGNOCHE 1 PE301 22 PHYS ED F w 2 8 7 17 ~-s 1 PE301 23 PHYS ED F B 10 9 19 PE301 PHYS ED 2 26 26 ~A 3ENNETT 1 PE401 25 PHYS ED F w 2 1 11 9 23 :HAMBERLAIN 1 PE401 26 PHYS ED M w 2 15 6 23 \u0026lt;.OSS 1 PE401 27 PHYS ED F w 1 1 10 11 23 PE401 PHYS ED 5 ..., c.. 36 26 69 -iARRINGTON 1 PE501 30 PHYS ED F B 1 12 8 21 :OPELAND 1 PE501 31 PHYS ED F w 1 1 4 15 21 1ILLER 1 PE501 32 PHYS ED F w 2 6 14 ,-,.,..., r..c.. PE501 PHYS ED 1 4 22 37 64 DEPT TOTALS 13 13 139 161 1 327 .JILSEY 1 RE101 1 READING F 1,J 2 7 9 18 =- RTNER 1 RE101 5 READING F w 6 11 17 )IBEE 1 RE101 6 READING F w 2 4 12 18 ',ESSLER 1 RE101 7 READING F w i1 9 8 18 RE101 READING 4 1 ...,. c..o 40 71 :\u0026gt;MITH 1 RE201 8 READING F w 2 11 4 1 18 1ANNING 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_958","title":"North Little Rock School District, 2001-2002 School Profile","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2001/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School attendance","School employees","School enrollment","School improvement programs","Student activities","Students"],"dcterms_title":["North Little Rock School District, 2001-2002 School Profile"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/958"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["14 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n SCHOOL PROFILE Table of Contents * Staff Staff Changes Staff Attendance (Certified) Staff Attendance (Classified) School Enrollment Elementary Secondary Special Programs Special Education Four Year Comparison Class Enrollment (Elementary) Course Enrollment (Secondary) Extended Educational Programs School/District lntitiated Honors and Awards Committee/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities Tryout Information Student Attendance (After Nine Weeks) Students Retained Subject Area Courses Failed (Secondary) Graduation Information Dropout Statistics (Previous Semester) Achievement/Assessment Data Staff Development Update (Certified) Staff Development Update (Classified) Discipline Information (After Nine Weeks) Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation (COE) Survey Results Annual School Improvement Plan *INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED BY COMPUTER SERVICES Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY STAFF 2001-2002 FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER - WHITE BLACK OTHER - M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS 1 1 2 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 20 4 1 26 SPEC EDUC TEACHERS 1 1 2 MEDIA SPECIALISTS 1 1 G /T FACILITATORS 1 1 1 1 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 1 COUNSELORS 1 1 1 1 READING RECOVERY 1 1 1 1 H.O.T.S. !TOTAL CERTIFIED 11 26! TEACHER AIDES 3 3 CLERICAL STAFF 1 1 2 SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS 1 2 3 CAFETERIA WORKERS 2 3 5 COMPENSATORY AIDES 1 1 LUNCH AIDES ? 1 1 1 5 CROSSING GUARDS 1 1 2 INTERVENTION AIDE 1 1 PARENT COORDINATOR !TOTAL CLASSIFIED B! Page 1 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY STAFF 2001-2002 (CHANGES AFTER OCTOBER) FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER ~ WHITE BLACK OTHER ~ M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SPEC EDUC TEACHERS MEDIA SPECIALISTS GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST COUNSELORS !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES CLERICAL STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS CAFETERIA WORKERS COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES CROSSING GUARDS !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 2 CERTIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 3 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Certified Staff Absences PAGE Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female 5 25 White - Male 1 Other - Female Other - Male 3 by Race and Sex School 41 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM K-6 4.0 49.5 4.5 7-8 9-10 3 11-12 Other CLASSIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 4 - Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Race I Gender Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male Classified Staff Absences PAGE 4 by Race and Sex School 41 NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM Tot-Emp K-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 Other 10 33.0 5 17.0 8 8.5 2 2.0 SCHOOLN: ORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY ELEMENT ARY 2001-2002 SCHOOLE NROLLMENT GRADE WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL LEVEL M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # 0 0 0 0 PRE-K % # 12 6 18 17 18 35 10 7 17 70 KINDERGARTEN % 17% 9% 26% 24% 26% 50% 14% 10% 24% # 6 10 16 26 24 50 6 7 13 79 FIRST % 8% 13% 20% 33% 30% 63% 8% 9% 16% # 16 11 27 19 18 37 12 7 19 83 SECOND % 19% 13% 33% 23% 22% 45% 14% 8% 23% # 10 12 22 18 31 49 7 5 12 83 THIRD % 12% 14% 27% 22% 37% 59% 8% 6% 14% # 13 18 31 28 25 53 6 2 9 93 FOURTH % 14% 19% 33% 30% 27% 57% 8% 2% 10% # 1n 1q 29 ?n in 50 8 6 14 93 FIFTH % 22% 10% 31% 22% 32% 54% 9% 6% 15% TOTAL # 55 60 125 111 128 239 I 39 28 67 421. GRADES1 - 5 % 13.06% 14.25% 29.69% 26.37% 30.40%, 56. 77%,! 9.26% 1 6 .65% . 15.91 Page 5 SCH OOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARYSECONDARYS CHOOL E NROLLMENT 2001-2002 GRADE WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL 0 TH ER TOTAL L E V E L M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER # SIX % # SEVEN % # EIGHT % TOTAL # ENROLLMENT % G RADE I WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL 0 THE R TOTAL ~ L E V E L M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # NINE % # TEN % # ELEVEN % # TWELVE % TOTAL # ENROLLMENT % Page 6 TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN SPECIAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY WHITE PROGRAMS M # 11 % 37% # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % F 3 10% TOTAL WHITE 14 47% BLACK M F 4 fl 13% 27% TOTAL BLACK 1? 40% OTHER M 1 3, F ln'l: TOTAL OTHER 4 11'!: 2001-2002 TOTAL Page 7 SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY PLACEMENT WHITE TOTAL BLACK M F WHITE M F RESOURCE ROOM # 1 1 2 3 PLACEMENT M.R. % 17% 17% 33% 50% RESOURCE ROOM # 3 2 5 10 1 PLACEMENT L.D. % 19% 13% 31% 63% 6% # SELF-CONTAINED % # 2 1 3 13 7 SPEECH % 8% 4% 13% 54% 29% TRANSITION - BA - # SELF-CONTAINED % # RESOURSE ROOM/MH % # ? 11. I', ? ? RESOURSE ROOM/OHi % 18% 36% 55% 18% 1R% # RESOURSE ROOM 504 % # RESOURSE ROOM SE % # % PLACEMENTIS DETERMINEDB Y PRIMARYH ANDICAPPINGC ONDITION There is a District Self-Contained Unit on this campus TOTAL BLACK 5 R'.l% 11 AQ'l! 20 83% A 11',ql OTHER M F 1 4% 1 9% Yes e (Circle one) 2001-2002 TOTAL OTHER TOTAL 6 ' -\nt, __\n,. ,, ln 1 ?II. 4% - 1 11 9% , ... - \" ,_ ........ - . . - Page 8 SCH~L: NORTl:Hl EIGHTSE LEM. FOUR YEAR ENROL!ENT COMPARISON OCTOBER 1 DAT A (USED TO DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE ENROLLMENT RANGES) STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS BLACI\u0026lt; AND NON-BLACK INCLUDING KINDEI\\GARTEN EXCLUDING KINDERGARTEN BLACK 274 WHITE 133 2001-2002 OTHER 8~ TOTAL 491 0 % BLACK 55.80' BLACK 223 WHITE 167 2000-2001 OTHER 58 BLACK 239 WHITE 115 2001-2002 OTHER JjJ__ TOTAL 421 0 % BLACI\u0026lt; 57% BLACK 183 WHITE 143 2000-2001 OTHER 50 TOTAL 448 0 % BLACK 49.78' BLACK 236 WHITE 192 '1999-2000 OTHER 53 TOTAL 481 0 % BLACK 49 nf\n' BLACK 241 WHITE 205 1998-1999 OTHER 4f\nTOTAL 492 0 % BLACK 48. 98' TOTAL 376 0 % BLACK 48.67% BLACK 209 WHITE 152 1999-2000 OTHER 41 TOTAL 402 0 % BLACK 51. 99% BLACK 206 WHITE 169 1'l90-1999 OTHER '38 TOTAL 413 0 % BLACK 49.88% - 2001-2002 Page~ ,. SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY CLASS ENROLL MENT 2001-2002 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F MARIBEL VARGAS K 17 F H 4 PAIGE WRIGHT K 14 F w 3 CARLI NE THOMAS K 16 F w LULA TURNER K 15 F B CORRIE WEBB 8 F w AMY BURKS 9 F w KARI COOLEY. 1 11 F w LESLIE JOSHUA 1 0 F SHEILA WILLIAMS 2 5 F w AMY WI LlIAMS 2 6 F w PILAR WOODY 2 26 F w 0 TOTAL: Page 10 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY CLASS ENROLL MENT 2001-2002 (ELEMENT ARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F \\ ff ,,,,, ERIC WALDORF 2 7 M w 6 3 6 5 1 \u0026gt; \\. \u0026lt; y ,.,.,. ,.,~ LJi.JilllliLl Kil-1 GRISSOM 3 33 F w 3 2 5 8 3 1 '\u0026lt;I\u0026gt;ti \u0026lt;\u0026gt; ~ ~ ~ KIM REEVES 3 25 F w 1 3 3 7 5 1 ' u :: )[',\n,\n,\n,\n:\n, '\ni,C TRACYM CCONNAUGHHAY 3 32 F w 4 4 4 8 ,,,,0, 0 ., ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, \"' DANYIAL KI LGROE 3 24 F w 2 3 5 8 0 4 / ,\n,/:,,:/: ,::/ \"'\"' ,,.,,., - CONNIE O'DELL 4 21 F w 4 4 6 7 3 0 \u0026lt;Ell// TERRI DOMBROSKI 4 23 F w 3 4 8 7 2 0 :)\\,,,,. l'''\\F?i 'HY'\" RACHELT HURMAN 4 22 F w 4 'I 7 5 1 2 \u0026lt;\u0026lt;::I:H \u0026gt;\u0026lt;\u0026gt; JENNI FER NEWTON 4 1n F w 3 fi 7 _ :, /\\ :''''\"' - ,,,, JUDY BINGHAM 5 28 F w 4 6 ,,,,,, ,.,,,,,,, - CASEY YOUNG 5 20 F w 3 3 8 11 3 0 '\\t:::n: ~ \"''''\"'''''\" TOTAL: Page 10a SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY CLASS ENROLLMENT 2001-2002 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F STACY SMITH 5 19 F B 1 f\nf\nQ 1 1 TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 10a SCHOOL : NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARCY OURSE OFFERINGS AND LEVELS (SECONDARY SCHOOLS ONLY) s T u D E N T s WHITE TL BLACK TL OTHER TL WHITE Grade Course l M F M F M F '\"'/ M F # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: % Please use the following indicators: 1. Adv. Placement\n2. Honor9/Gifted\n3. Regular\n4. Spec. Educ. Resource Example: English 10/2 = English, tenth grade/honors/gifted T E A C TL BLACK M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H E TL :\n::\n:::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001-2002 Ouolicate as need ed R s OTHER TL M F 0 0 Page 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCtiO.ORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY EXTENDED EDUCATI.L PROGRAMS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAM MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL GOVERNOR'S # SCHOOL % # BOY'S STATE % # GIRL'S STATE % ,. # SUMMER SCHOOL % \\.c, ' . PRE- # KINDERGARTEN % # KINDERGARTEN % # 1 1 2 4 6 6 3 9 16 FIRST % 6% 6% 13% 25% 38% 38% 19% 56% 1 # SECOND % .,. # THIRD % , . # FOURTH % ,. # FIFTH % ' # SIXTH % GRADES SEVEN # AND EIGHT % GRADES NINE # THRUTWELVE % .. QUEST # j ,:'. 5 0 4 4 9 SUMMER SCHOOL % 33% 22% 56% 44% 1 Page 12 scHIL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY HONORS AND AWARDS 2001-2002 I List all honors and awards - - - - - be seecific I HONORS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # REGULAR HONOR ROLL % # 17 15 32 13 21 34 4 2 6 72 PRINCIPAL'S HONOR ROLL % 53% 47% 44% 38% 62% 47% 67% '1'1'1: 8% # 12 19 31 14 26 40 4 6 10 81 ABC HONOR ROLL % 39% 61% 38'.l: 35% /\nl\n'l/ 4Q'.l: 40'.l: i\nn 1?'.l: # 25 18 43 44 49 93 15 10 25 161 PERFECT ATTENDANCE % 58% 42% 27'.l: 47'.l: \"1'.l: \u0026lt;\nQSI nO'l: lln'll ln' # ALL A'S ON SPELLING TEST % # 100% ON UNIT ENGLISH EX. % # 1ST GRADE HELPERS % # GREAT BEHAVIOR % # MOST IMPROVED READING % # POPCORN MONITORS % # FLAG MONITORS % # TOP BANANA AWARDS % # FIR MARSHALLS % # 30 35 65 40 71 111 21 27 48 224 CITIZENSHIP AWARD % 46% 54% 29% 36% 64% 50% 44% 56% 21% # SCIENCE AWARD % # ENGLISH AWARD % # READING AWARD % Page 13 HONORS A.AWARDS I List all honors and awards - - - - - be seecific I HONORS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # REGULAR HONOR ROLL % # PRINCIPAL'S HONOR ROLL % # ABC HONOR ROLL % # PERFECT ATTENDANCE % # ALL A'S ON SPELLING TEST % # 100% ON UNIT ENGLISH EX. % # 1ST GRADE HELPERS % # GREAT BEHAVIOR % # MOST IMPROVED READING % # POPCORN MONITORS % # FLAG MONITORS % # TOP BANANA AWARDS % # FIR MARSHALLS % # CITIZENSHIP AWARD % # SCIENCE AWARD % # ENGLISH AWARD % # READING AWARD % Page 13a SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEM. COMMITTEES/PARENT IN VOLVEMENT 2001-2002 EMPLOYEES PARENTS/ PATRONS 0 F F I C E R s WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER TL WHITE BLACK OTHER TL :OMMITTEE M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F ~UITY # 4 1 5 COMMITTEE % Ano/. ?M'. \\RENT TEACHER # 1 ?1 n 7 ? ?? \u0026lt;\n? 1\u0026lt;\n4? 4 14 lA? 6 1 7 ASSOCIATION % 1% 13% 4% 1% 12% 29% 8% 23% 2% 8% 0.86 0 14 ~t:C clttQC~~tl1_ # JLUNTEERS % '. .1 ' ~, # % ~ i r -- # % ~-1 .. .,~ # % # % # % .. # % \" # % ' # % # % Page 14 11/07/2001 14:25 581- 771-8818 NLRSD:PERSCNtLC JFFI Ref: VIPS1 10/11/01. 6.45,14 VIPS BY SCHOOL BY RACE/GENDER Date: -Time: SCHOOL: 41 ~~ WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAft, M F M F M F ' SCHOOL 130:i 218 539 J.43 386 8 9 PAGE 01 HOURS 4,115.50 SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 2001-2002 ACTIVITY MEMBERSHIP SPONSORS OR WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL CLUB M F M F M F M F M F M F # 4 2 3 2 1 1 FIRE MARSHALLS % 36% 18% 27% 18% 50% 50% # FT.,AG MONITORS % ,,.:. BOOKSTORE # 1 2 1 1 MONITORS % 25% 50% 25% 100% ... ,. STUDENT # COUNCIL % ,_, STUDENT # COUNCIL OFFICERS %\n# 2 3 1 LIBRARY MONITORS % 33% 50% 17% # 1 1 ? 1 1 OFF! CE MONITORS % 17% 17% 33% 17% 17% # 1 2 1 KJNC:l'RGARTFN Mf1NTTO~ % 25% 50% 25% - # % # % # % . # % # % Page 15 SCHOOL : NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARYE XTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITES 2001-200 2 OFFICERS / LEADERSHIP WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL ACTIVITY OR CLUB M F M F M F # STUDENT COUNCIL % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 15a SCHOOL: NORTHE IGHTSE LEMENTARY SPIRIT GROUP T RYOUTS 2001-200 2 (SECONDARY SCHOOLS ONLY) WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL TOTAL JUDGES OTHER TOTAL ACTIVITY/ CLUB M F M F M F WM WF BM BF M F # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % TOTAL: # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Page 16 2001-2002 STUDENT ATTENDANCE AFTER NINE-WEEKS (ATTACH COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 17 SCHOOL: N ORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY STUDENTS RETA INED 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # Kl N DERGARTEN % ' ,, . ' # FIRST % j, # SECOND % '\n# THIRD % .~_\n: -~.!'-,: .\n/ # FOURTH % \ni\n,\n1~ # 1 1 FIFTH % 100% 100% t1 f -:,- # SIXTH % J ~-' r1 # SEVENTH % ~ , ' ., # EIGHT % # NINTH % # TENTH % ' , # ELEVEN % # TWELFTH % Page 18 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARYS UBJECT AREA COUR SES FAILED 2001-2002 (SECONDARY) I WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL COURSES MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % Page 19 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY GRADUATION INFOR MATION 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL . . YEAR MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 20 SCHOOL: NORTHH EIGHTSE LEMENTARY DROPOUT STATI STICS 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL -:,,,\n,\n,\n, GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % Page 21 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT -ASSESSMENT DATA SAT-9 (PLEASE ATTACH MOST RECENT INFORMATION) Page 22 - ST.4.'V FORD ACHIEVDfEST TEST SERIES, l'.\nf.\\TH ED!T!O.Y TE.'.CHER:\n\\ORTH HEIGHTS ELE:11 GRADE: 01 SCHOOL: DISTRJCT: !\\ORTH UTILE ROCK - SPRI:\\G 200 TEST D.-\\T E: 04/16/01 RU!\\ DA TE: 05/08/01 GROL'P: GE'iERAL POPl\"L..\\ TIO:\\ l,('.'1 :\nI Mean I _\\!~an j '.\\ledian I'. \\ational: SUBTESTS ASD :\\umber Raw l!\\atlonall, Grade lndiv i -rn-r., \u0026lt;\" T ... \" ~ \"l\nrl' I'm,\n,. PIL~ I Total Reading 64 80.3 61.6 , , __ j 71-6 I. .! Word Study Skills 6.: 27.4 614 2.5 71-6 Word Reading 65 22.i 60.4 2.2 69-6 Reading Comprehension 65 29.9 60.i ~-2 69-6 Total Mathematics 65 47.0 54.5 2.0 5S-5 Math: Problem Solving 65 30.6 53.6 2.0 57-5 Math\nProcedures 65 16.4 55.0 2.0 59-5 Percent In ach I\n!1 CONTENT CLUSTERS\n\\um,,b_ er_ of Oc:low Above CONTENT CLUSTERS ,\\q,ri:c Avc:ra,:c A,c:r11c\n' Word Study Skills 36 6 53 41 Structural Analysis 12 3 58 39 Phonetic Analysis-Consonants 12 14 42 44 Phonetic Analysis-Vowels 12 14 47 39 Word Reading 30 8 51 42 Reading Comprehension 40 6 55 38 Two-Sentence Stories (Rjddles) 5 5 43 52 Short Passages (Clozc) 15 8 51 42 Short Passages w/Questions 20 18 45 37 Recreational 10 17 57 26 Textual 5 15 51 34 Functional 5 29 42 29 Initial Understanding 9 12 55 32 Interpretation II 18 46 35 Math: Problem Solving 44 23 49 28 Concepts/Whole No. Comput. 3 2 72 26 Number Sense and Numeration 12 12 55 32 Geometry and Spatial Sense 5 18 45 37 Measurement 8 32 35 32 Sti.tistics and Probability 5 28 22 51 Fraction and Decimal Concepts 3 0 77 23 Pattcms \u0026amp; Relationships 5 22 51 28 Problem-Solving Strategies 3 17 65 18 Math: Procedures 25 1-l 51 35 Number Facts 8 II 62 28 Computation/Symbolic Notation II 22 46 32 Computation in Context 6 1 s I 51 31 I I I I i I i I I I I I I S_TA.\"ffORDLEVEI.JFOR.\\1/BA TTERY: PRI'.\\URY l / S / Full Length :'\\OR.\\IS: Spring 1995 '.'ialional :'\\arms I\nI i ! I i GROUP REPORT FOR :\\\"ORTH HEIGHTS ELL\\! '.\\ational Grade Percentile Bands tn ln ~n ~n on , oc Percent In Elch Number of llc:low Abo-v, lt,-.mc, Avc:rat\nC: ,\\vc:nc c: Ac:uu I I I i I ! i I Report :cnerarcd by READY RPORTST V~A 7..l..ll for :'lion.h Little Rod Sdlool Oismd .)cores baud on aormauvc dau cop:i,r1i::btC 1996 b~ lbrcoun. l.nc. All n:hu reserved. STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION ! TEACHER: .......................... GR.A.DE: 01 SCHOOL: l'o'ORTH HEIGHTS ELD! TEST D . .\\TE: 04/16/01 DISTRICT: GROUP: NORTH LITTLE ROCK- SPRl:'\\G 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GE..'iERAL POPUL.\\ TIO:'\\ SUBTESTS AND Total R.eadin g 64 3 Word Srudy Skills 64 2 Word Reading 65 8 Reading Comprehension 65 3 Total Mathematics 65 6 Math: Problem Solving 65 8 Ma th.: Procedures 65 5 G() Percent in Each . , I . 38 34 33 -31 29 38 42 23 45 40 35 46 52 25 fl:, p I 25 34 25 32 9 II 18 P. I GROUP REPORT with PERFOR.'\\1A .N. \"CES TA. \\.l )A.RDS FOR :--\nORTH HEIGHTS ELE.'\\1 Performance Standards are content-referenced scores that reflect what studentS know and should be able to do in given subject areas. { The Stanford Performance Standards were determined by expert panels of educators, who judged C.'.lcbte st question on the basis of bow students at different levels of achievement should perform. These expert judgements yielded four categories or levels of student performance. Level l indicates little or no mastery of fundamental knowledge and skills. Level 2 denotes partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for satisfactory work. At the high school level, this is higher than minimum competency skills. Level 3 represents solid academic performance, indicating that students are prepared for the next grade. At the high school level, this indicates preparedness for democratic citizenship, responsible adulthood, and productive work. Level 4 signifies performance beyond gr.ide level mastery. At the high school level, this shows readiness for rigorous college courses, advanced technical training, or employment requiring advanced academic achievement. NOT ES ST A.'iFORDLEVEUFOR\\1/BA TTERY: PRl:'11..\\RY I/SI Full Len!'lh :'\\OR,tS: Spring 1995 :'\\ational :'\\orms ~ Repon :cnc.nttd b~ READY R.EPOR'fS'TV'Mcn ioa 7-l-23 for :'-onh Urtlc Rock School District Scores based on nonnuive dau cop~Ti:ht .C 1996 by Harcourt. Lac. All ri:hu rcscnrd. ~. TF.AC'I IEll: SCIIOUI.: DISTRICT: - - STANFORD AC/1/EVEMENT TEST SERIES, N/NT/1 EDITION NOllTII IU:IGIITS F.LEJ\\I GRADE: 01 TEST DATE: 04/16/01 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 --- ADJ\\IINISTRATOll'S l\u0026gt;ATA SIJI\\IJ\\IAllY FOil NORTII IIEIGlllS ELF.1\\1 GllO\\JI': NOllTII LITTLE HOCK - sr1UNG 2001 l\nENEIUL l'Ul'IJLATION l'a\u0026amp;j I I I I I I I I I - llEAUING l\\1ATIIEI\\IATICS LANGUAGE ENVIRONJ\\IENT, \\ IIATTF.RY TOT,\\L Nlll\\~~m TESTEll \\ _. soc AL SCIENCE I 1 bh SCIENCE, TO l'ALS ~---------1-llca Tola Vluolnl ! Wort! Reamtl Total rr,uoub: L.JLJlJ\\.l.aUth\"- --lf----'----''----lf----lf----i,----'----''----1--- ______________ _ N11111hlc'rn ssihlc I 106 36 30 401 69 44 25 N11111hc1rc stc,1 M 64 65 65 65 65 65 Na1io11al1 Hlivi,\\11al I 696 I rR-S of Mean Nl\"E 716 716 696 585 57.5 59.5 Na11111iIa'll S11111111a1y HO . 99 N 24 26 21 22 17 14 16 60 79 N 14 12 20 13 15 17 20 40 59 N 13 14 II 15 II 14 9 20 . 19 N II 9 9 11 13 10 131 I I I Ill - /9 N 2 3 4 4 9 10 7 I I'- so . 99 0/ 38 41 32 )4 26 22 25 ,., Ml 79 ,., 22 19 31 20 2) 26 JI ,., 40 59 ,,,.,, 20 22 17 23 17 22 14 111 39 1)f, 17 14 14 17 20 15 20 ()/ . /9 'J,i, ) 5 6 6 14 15 II l'c1cc111A t/Ahovc the I 60 I Na11011a5l1 1thI 'll (,\u0026lt;, (,9 72 60 62 58 Natinnal NC\"IS'. talistics Mc1111 (,I.(, 61.4 60.4 60.7 54.5 53.6 55.0 S1n11d,m/lJ c.-i11tw11 I').\\ I 9.3 18.6 20.5 18.9 19.6 18.8 l'c,-re111Ucs 1'90 90th ')1.lJ 87.5 84.5 90.7 79.1 78.7 77.2 (!J 75th 71.5 71.5 70.4 73.6 67.5 65.\\ 66.5 A/c,/11111 50th (,\\.7 59.1 59.9 57.9 54.3 53.8 54.1 (!I 15th 4(,.5 46.1 45.6 43.7 38.9 38.8 37.5 /'/0 . /()(/, 38.8 35.1 36.7 35.4 27.3 26.4 27.7 Il i}~i-~,\\ ~ -.S T-A-~-_-F L__OE__RVD_E __UM _/F~BO~AR-T T_E_R_Y_:_P_R_1_1\\_1A_-_-R__Y_-_1_--/ -S/_F_u_.l.l.1_.l. A_._J_._._n___g t_h ~ __ _1, ___ 1-. _________ L1t,por1--,-nJff-,~-,-R-EiA_P_V_R_E_r_OLRTl\"-.--v.-n-,--,.-1.-u-1...Jw Lt:\u0026lt;'.:NORMS1Srrln11995N1tlon1INonn1 . ' ,'!'\n. ' ,,, : .,., llrtu111o11o\u0026lt;S\u0026lt;NIDlolrid ! 'IEI\\CIIER: S('IIOOI.: OISTRllT: til(OlJI': ~ STANFORD AC/1/EVE/IIENT TEST ~ERIES, NINTII EDITION# .................... NOHTII IIEIGIITS ELEl\\1 NOHTII I.ITTI.E HOCK - SPRING 2001 GENERAL l'Ol'lJLATION GRADE: 02 TEST DATE: 0~116101 RUN DATE: 05108101 -- r------- - ---1. AOI\\IINISTltATOH'S l\u0026gt;ATA Slll\\11\\11\\HY FOil NOlffll llEIGIITS El.El\\! .. - ,----- l'a c I HEADING I\\IATIIEI\\IATICS LANGUAGE ENVIRONI\\IENT, ________,_\n,\n1:::1:k, T,o,, '\"\" \"\"\" soc'~:,'\nc~lNc-e- -,------,----,--- -- 1 OT,\\I. NlJl\\lllEH TESTED 66 IIATTEltY TOTALS N11111hle'or ssihle N11111bTcre sted National Individual l'R-S of Mean Nl'E National I'll S11111111ary RO - 99 60 - 79 40 - 59 20 - 39 0/ - IV Ii(/ - 99 Ml 79 40 - 59 2/J - 39 (If - /9 Pi::1cc11/1\\1 /Ahovl! 1hc National 511th I'll National N\u0026lt; 'E Sialistics Me1111 S11111d1/1 Jrde vi11tio11 l'crcc111i/cs !'YO QJ Median QI /'/() 118 (,2 48-5 N 5 N 20 N 13 N I(, N 8 .,, 8 ~r, , 32 11, ,u 21 ,,,.,, 2(, % 13 50 48.9 14.8 - Y//tl, 64.5 - 751!, 59.9 501!, 49.3 ]5/1, 37.8 I/Jti, 27.9 48 65 48-5 9 12 9 30 5 14 18 14 46 8 40 49.0 16.1 70.4 60.9 43.0 36.6 32.4 30 40 62 65 41-5 54-5 2 13 15 15 22 14 13 17 10 6 3 20 24 23 35 22 21 26 16 9 45 58 45.5 52.3 16.4 16.3 62.5 75.1 55.4 60.8 47.4 51.4 37.4 38.2 22.I 31.5 74 65 50-5 13 17 II 10 14 20 26 17 15 22 52 50.2 20.4 76.2 64.4 50.9 34.3 19.5 STANFORD I.EVEIJFUH/\\1/IJATJ'EHY: PRIMARY 2 / S / Full Length NOltMS: Spring 1995 National Norms 46 65 46-5 10 18 10 13 14 15 28 15 20 22 49 47.9 20.0 71.9 60.I 48.7 32.4 20.1 28 65 58-5 21 13 10 14 7 321 20 15 22 II 57 54.4 20.8 75.8 66.9 54.3 36.6 28.2 I I Srorn buf\"d on onn11hr data top)Tlthl C\u0026gt; 1996 by lhr1ur1, lac. All rlc:ht, rr-Kntd. I I I .. -. Rrpor1 crntnlrd by Rf:AllV Ht:rotns, Vr\"lon 7.!.U ror North UUlt Roc-lt School lJl1trfC1 TEACHER: SCHOOL: DISTRICT: GROUP: STAS FORD ACHIEVE:\\fE.\\'T TJ::..S I .SJ::.Kll::.S, /\\/,, I t1 t:.u, uu., ................ ,.. ................ ,r .. ,......... GR--\\DE: OZ 'iORTH HEIGHTS ELE\\I ITST DAE 04/l 610 I 'iORTH LITTLE ROCK-SPR!'iG 200 RC~ D.-\\TE: 05108/01 GE'iERAL POPl:LA TIO:\\ I :',lean l :',lean l\n\\ledian /'iational liBTESTS A:\\'D :\\umber!' Raw l:\\ational!' Grade \\ lndh\nI ...,-ri:- JC.. . ,.. oo_c TnT.\u0026lt;f\u0026lt;' TP\u0026lt;-' \"---- Total Reading 62 I 73.2 48.9 I 2.8 4S-5 I 2.4 4S-5 .T Word Srudy Skills 65 32.1 49.0 Reading Vocabulary 62 IS.O 45.5 2.i 41-5 ! :1 Reading Comprehension 65 22.9 52.3 2.9 54-5 : Total Mathematics 65 49.9 502 2.9 50-5 Math: Problem Solving 65 29.5 47.9 2.7 46-5 Math: Procedures 65 20.4 54.4 3.1 58-5 Percent In Each I I I, ' CONTENT CLUSTERS Number of lldow Above CONTENT CLUSTERS ltn.,...,.. ,\\\\cr i:c Anntt ,\\vcrai:t' ' ord Study Skills 48 15 69 15 ctura! Analysis 12 12 88 0 onetic Analysis-Consonants 18 17 60 23 Phonetic Analysis-Vowels 18 34 55 II Rending Vocabulary JO 19 74 6 Synonyms 18 15 73 13 Context 6 24 53 23 Multiple Meanings 6 24 69 6 Reading Comprehension 40 15 63 22 . Recreational 14 17 58 25 Textual 13 II 72 17 Functional 13 15 60 25 Initial Understanding 14 17 51 32 Interpretation 20 9 77 14 Critical Analysis 3 18 65 17 . Pn:x:css Strategies J II 63 26 Math: Problem Solving 46 28 54 18 Concepts/Whole No. Comput. 4 25 63 12 Number Sense and Numeration 10 17 48 35 Geometry and Spatial Sense 5 23 65 12 Measurement 10 28 48 25 Statistics and Probability 6 20 68 12 Fraction and Decimal Concepts 3 17 83 0 Patterns \u0026amp; Relationships 5 26 57 17 Problem-Solving Strategies J 12 62 26 Math: Procedures 28 18 49 ,, j_ Number Facts 8 12 54 ,, j~ Computation/Svrnbolic ~ot.:Jtion 12 11 49 29 Computation id Context -- 8 14 51 35 I S_TA.'\\fORDLE\\'EUFOR.\\1/BA TIER\\': PRJ:\\1.-\\RY ! IS i Full Length :'iCR\\IS: Spring 1995 :'iational :\\orms i GROCP REPORT FOR :\\ORTH HEIGHTS ELDI 'iational Grade Percentile Bands 1n 10 ~o 70 Qn I QQ Percent In \"ach Number of Below Above It- Avcr cc A,,.crcc Av,rac I I i I I i I J I. I I ! Rcpon :cncr2ttii b~:R ADY RPORTST\"\"\\' crsio 7.2.ll (w :\",onh Little Rack Schoo1 OlJUict Scores bas~ on normative data cop~Ti:ht t: 199ti b~-ibrcourt. Inc. All ri:hu rescrHd. TEACHER: SCi-!00!...: DfSTRJCT: GROUP: Taul Reading .,)J...-t.,I'VI\\U.\"I\\..JllL' L..\"L..1J lLJI _,~,_~,_....,..,, .... ..... ..,.,,...,,. ......... w ........................ ,., GK...:..D~. o: '\\ORTHHEIGHTSELOI -:-c:s-:-0:.:-\u0026gt;:-:: OJ1ooi '\\ORTH LITTLE ROCh:-SPRJ'.\\G :!00 R.:..:D-- ..\n: -.-:-:: 05108\n01 GE:,iER-'.L POPl\"LA TIO:\\ PERFOR\\IA:\\CE ST.-'.:\\DARDS J 62 IS ' 5~ 29 GROUP REPORT with PERFOR.\\L.\u0026gt;,.:\\CE ST . .\\..'\\DARDS FOR '\\ORTH HEIGHTS ELDI Word S rudy Skills 65 s Reading Vocabulary 62 19 Reading Comprehension 65 25 Taul Mathematics 65 ,, Math: Problem Solving 65 60 '' 52 42 35 IS 31 37 25 2 11 0 5 6 6 18 Performance Standards are content-referenced scores that reflect what srudems know and should be able IO do in g\nven subject areas. Tne Stanford Performance Standards were determined by expen ( panels of educators, who judged each test question oo the basis of how srudents at differenI levels ofachievemein should perform. These ex pen judgements yielded four categories or levels of srudem performance. Math: Procedures 65 ,- -\" ... .. 34 NOTES Level I indicates linle or no mastery of fundamental knowledge and skills. Level 2 denotes partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are fundamental for satisfactory work. Al the high school level, this is higher than minimum competency skills. Level 3 represents solid academic performance, indicating that students are prepared for the next grade. Al the high school level, this indicates preparedness for democratic citizenship, responsible adullhood, and productive work. Level 4 signifies performance beyond grade level mastery. Al the high school level, this shows readiness for rigorous college courses. advanced technical training, or employment requiring advanced academic achievement. I ~TA.'\\F~RDLEYEUF\u0026lt;?~\\L'BA TTERY: PRl'\u0026gt;I...\\RY _, S, Full Length OR)!S. Spring 1995 :\\auonal :\\arms Rrport :rnrruro b~ REA.DY RPOR\"fyM \\\"rn:100 -:..:.:.fJor :--\nonb Lietlr Roclt School Oumct .5coru 02ud oo normatnr dau coprn~ht C 19ao b~ H2rcour1. Inc. A.JI nthu rcsrnrd. I - - - STANFORD ACHIEVDIENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION TEACHER: ******************** GRADE: 03 SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 DISTRJCT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK- SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GROUP: GENERAL POPULATION Mean Mean Median National SUBTESTS AND Number Raw National Gnde lndiv TnT.H\u0026lt;. T .. \u0026lt;tP\u0026lt;l CM- Nr-i. r ... , .. PD.C Total Reading 68 49.0 43.3 }.2 37-4 Reading Vocabulary 68 18.4 42.3 3.1 36-4 { Reading Comprehension 68 30.6 45.2 3.2 41-5. Total Mathematics 68 49.3 50.0 3.9 50-5 Math: Problem Solving 68 30.4 50.2 3.8 50-5 Math: Procedures 68 18.9 52.I 4.0 54-5 Language 68 25.2 46.9 3.2 44-5 Spelling 68 18.6 51.2 3.8 52-5 Science 68 206 39.5 2.5 31-4 Social Science 68 17.8 40.4 2.8 32-4 Listening 68 23.1 44.7 3.3 40-5 Using Information 68 24.8 40.3 2.6 32-4 Thinking Skills 68 104.0 42.6 2.9 36-4 Basic Battery 68 165.3 47.5 3.5 45-5 Complete Battery 68 203.6 45.8 3.3 42-5 Percent In ach CONTENT CLUSTERS Number or Bdow Above CONTENT CLUSTERS It- Ann gc Avcragc Avcrai:c Reading Vocabubry 30 31 59 10 Spelling Synonyms 18 28 59 13 Sight Words Context 6 34 54 12 Phonetic Principles Multiple Meanings 6 29 59 12 Structural Principles No Mistake Reading Comprehension 54 26 57 16 Recreational 18 19 66 15 Science Textual 18 34 46 21 Earth \u0026amp; Space Science Functional 18 38 47 15 Physical Science Initial Understanding 14 26 57 16 Life Science Interpretation . 24 22 57 21 Science Process Skills Critical Analysis 8 22 71 7 Process Strategies 8 34 60 6 Social Science History Math: Problem Solving 46 24 56 21 Geography Concepts/Whole No. Comput. 4 IO 81 9 Civics \u0026amp; Government Number Sense and Numeration 6 25 41 34 Economics Geurnetry and Spatial Sense 6 22 53 25 Culture Measurement IO 31 41 28 Statistics and Probability 6 19 56 25 Listening Fraction and Decimal Concepts 4 7 76 16 Vocabulary Patterns \u0026amp; Relationships 3 13 87 0 Comprehension Estimation 3 18 71 12 Recreational Problem-Solving Strategies 4 41 49 10 Informational Functional Math: Procedures 30 15 62 24 Initial Understanding Number Facts 6 15 44 41 Interpretation Computation/Symbolic Notation 12 19 51 29 Computation in Context 9 29 51 19 Using Information Rounding 3 16 65 19 Thinking Skills Language 48 29 54 i 16 Capitalization 6 32 431 25 I Punctuation 6 37 3gl 25 ! Usage 6 18 561 26 I Sentence S trucrure 10 31 57 ! 12 Content and Organization 10 I 28 57 i 15 Ch,,., c,1,.\n11. in ?O ~QI J? STANFORDLEVEUFOR.\\1/BATTERY: PRIMARY 3/S/ Full Length :-IOR\n'\\1S: Period 15 1995 National Norms GROUP REPORT FOR NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY National Grade Percentile Bands 1f\\ QO n, Per, ent In ~ach Number or Below Above It- Avcrac c Avtr l t Annur.- 30 19 59 2t. 5 12 60 28 - 12 12 69 19 8 19 56 25 5 26 40 34 40 40 50 IO 12 28 66 6 14 47 43 10 14 34 53 13 30 53 38 9 40 34 56 10 9 40 46 15 IO 28 65 7 8 26 62 12 8 35 56 9 5 35 49 16 40 29 51 19 IO 28 53 19 30 38 43 19 IO 38 50 12 10 31 47 22 10 40 37 24 12 38 44 18 18 40 44 16 47 44 43 13 191 40 49 12 y Report :e11cntt'd by READY R.EPOR'TS\"' Va-JMN7I .l.l:3 f ~ ortb Utt!e. Rock Sdlool Dtsrrict Scora b\u0026amp;kd o an:nadvc data copyncbt O 1996 by Hucoun. la.c.. Ail ri:hu rtse\"rnd. ei i STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, NINTH EDITION TEACHER: '.\"\"\".:HOOL: ******************** GRADE: 03 i\\ORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY TEST DATE: 04/16/01 DISTRICT: GROUP: NORTH UTILE ROCK- SPRING 200 RUN DATE: 05/08/01 GENERAL POPULATION SUBTESTS AND rnr~,,, Number Te\u0026lt;tPrl Total Reading Reading Vocabulary Reading Comprehension Total Mathematics Math: Problem Solving Math: Procedures Language Spelling Science Social Science Listening Using Information Thinking Skills Basic Battery Complete Battery 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 PERFOR.i\"LANCE STA.'1/OARDS I ovol 1 34 25 37 24 25 15 37 19 40 34 25 NA NA NA NA t8 Percent in Each I ovol 2 f ouol l I f ovol 4 40 35 37 44 38 46 38 44 44 51 51 NA NA NA NA 18 29 22 29 29 31 18 24 12 13 18 NA NA NA NA p 9 ro '4 3 7 9 7 13 4 I 6 NA NA NA NA p NOTES STA.i'I/FORDLEVEUFORM/BAITERY: PRIMARY 3 / S / Full Length NOR.i\\1S: Period 15 1995 National Norms GROUP REPORT with PERFOR.!~ANCESTANDARDSFOR NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY Performance Standards are content-referenced scores that reflect what students know and should be able to do in given subject areas. The Stanford Performance Standards were determined by expert panels of educators, who judged each test question on the basis of how students at different levels of achievement should perform. These expert judgements yielded four categories or levels of student performance. Level I indicates little or no mastery of fundamental knowledge and skills. :\n''? Level 2 denotes partial mastery of the knowledge and skills that are _.x, fundamental for satisfactory work. At the high school level, this is . higher than minimum competency skills. '--'.\\~ Level 3 represents solid academic performance, indicating that students are prepared for the next grade. At the high school level, this indicates preparedness for democratic citizenship, responsible adulthood, and productive work. Level 4 signifies performance beyond grade level mastery. At the high school level, this shows readiness for rigorous college courses, advanced technical training, or employment requiring advanced ,. academic achievement. :.,-..-c.1,. Rcpon e\ncncrated by RE.ADY REPORTS\"' Vtnloa 7..1.%3.\nNorth Uttle Rod\u0026lt; Sd,ool Diolrid .::~-l~ Scores baxd on normadvc d.au copyrie\nbc 'ti 1996 by H.ara\u0026gt;urt. lnc:. All rigbu reser\ncd. \\:~it~ TEAC'IIER: SCIIOOI.: IJISIIWT: \u0026lt;.illOUI': STANFORD ACIIIEVEMENT TEST SERIES, /l'll\\'T/1 EDITION .................... NOl!TII IIEIGIITS ELEMENTARY NOltTll 1.r!TI.F. ltOCK-SPRING 2001 GENEltAI. l'Ol'ULATION GRADE: OJ 1 EST DA TE: 04116/0 I RUN IJA IE: 0~/08/01 REAIJING ~IATIIE~IA-1 ICS LANGUAGE TutI I I~ ~I:~ ~..~~.~ . TOTAi. NUMIIEH TESTEIJ 68 Total 1 Pilioh ~lath ---1lt.:11I 1\\1,.11, _s, IC,_ Number l'ussil,lc 84 30 54 76 46 30 Nun1bcrT ested 68 68 68 68 68 68 National lndividu\n:al l'R-S of Mean NCE 37-4 36-4 41-5 50-5 50-5 54-5 National l'R Summary 80 - 99 N 9 7 10 13 10 16 60 79 N 8 4 8 17 16 16 40 - 59 N 7 18 9 10 15 9 10. 3Y N 27 22 28 15 16 18 0/ 19 N 17 17 13 13 II 9 80 - 99 % .. 13 10 15 19 15 24 60 79 % 12 6 12 25 24 24 40 - 59 % 10 26 13 15 22 13 10 J9 % 40 32 41 22 24 26 0/ 19 % 25 25 19 19 16 13 Percent At/Almvc the National 50lh l'R ( -~8) 31 29 eJ.' 53 54 National NCE S1atist1cs Menn 43.3 42.3 45.2 50.0 50.2 52. I Stn11d(lrdD eviation 17.9 19.2 17.1 19.2 19.7 19.I Percentiles P90 - 901l1 71.6 62.9 70.5 74.5 74.7 72 4 QJ 75th 55.2 52.8 55 5 64.6 62.4 64 7 Mcdit111 -50rh 40.9 39.3 423 50 4 49.6 52.6 QI - 25th 32.0 29.6 33.7 35.5 35.6 38.1 /'/0 - /Otl, 20.6 16.2 24.2 23.4 24.5 20.8 SrANF(lltU LF,VF.IJlOR~l/0,\\17 F.RY: PRIMARY 31 S / Fu0 L,ngth NORM~: Pcrioll 15 1995 National Norms ~-I l 48 68 44-5 9 13 II 20 15 13 19 16 29 22 I 40 ) 46.9 17.8 74 I 58.5 44.0 328 25.3 _sP\"\" JO 68 52-5 13 12 20 13 10 19 18 29 19 15 (2!, I 512 18.9 743 62.4 48.8 36.9 28.4 !-tflrrJ b1\u0026lt;td on n1111n1lht d111 rop.1996b) llarC'ourt, l11t. All rl1thl1 rtltntd, ADMINISTllATOlt'S l\u0026gt;ATA SIIM~IAltY FOIi NOltTJI JIF.IGII IS EI.F.~lF.NTAltV - - - ENVIRONMENT, SCIENCE, soclAL s:T::: Sci- Soc I.le\n(- Uc.Ing I hnkJ! n.c. :ic_ 1-tning Info_ Skis 40 40 411 47 191 68 68 \u0026lt;,X \u0026lt;,X loX 31-4 32-4 40-5 12-4 _\\(i.,\\ 5 7 Ill ,, X 6 \u0026lt;, ,, ,, X II 7 1,, Ill Ill 21 28 I.I 17 211 25 20 IX 2,, 22 7 10 \" 'I 12 9 9 11 11 11 16 10 24 15 II 31 41 22 25 2') 37 29 2,, JX .12 21 24 34 28 2(, 39.5 40.4 44 7 40.J 42.fi 17.2 17.1 19.4 18.2 18.4 64.2 64 6 69.6 (1.~.9 (1')'i 46.6 47.7 55.5 505 _, I 4 38.2 39.0 431 37 4 41 I 26.3 28.7 27 8 25 5 )(12 20.5 16.2 21 7 19.5 IR.fi ----- Page I 11/ITl\"EltY TOTALS U:ic.ic I Cum11I UalL Ball nx l~X hS h/-1 \"~ c\n12-5 X 8 12 8 IX 21 l'I 20 II II 12 12 18 12 U, 11 28 29 I(, 16 4J 38 47 5 45.8 15 6 15.5 (ii) 9 (,8.J ,7 4 54.6 47 2 46.I J(, 9 J5.I 26 7 750 THREE YEAR COMPARISON OF MEAN PERCENTILE RANK NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL - GRADE 5 50 .,----------------------------------------, 45-1---------~~--------------------~~------1 40 -1---------1 30 25 20 - 15-- 10 __ 5 0 \\\"\"\" \"'\" FALL 1999 FALL 2000 Reading Mean PR 24 33 37 Mathematics Mean PR 26 29 45 Language Mean PR 30 33 41 Science Mean PR 22 30 29 Social Science Mean PR 21 36 34 Basic Complete Battery Battery Mean PR Mean PR 29 28 34 35 45 43 EJFALL 199!1 ll!IFALL 1999 FALL 2000 ( vi,)\u0026lt; LI PRIMARY( GR~ 4) BENCHMARKE XAMINATION e: 1 MAT HE MAT ICS SCHOOLS UMMARYR EPORT:G ENERALP OPULATION A,hnsu D1strtct Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL OISTRICT School Name: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Grade: 04 C'omrrchcnsiTvc slingA, ucnmcnl LEA K: 60-02 School Number: 063 Date of Test: Aprt I 2001 \u0026amp;Accountabilily Pro111m Total Number of Students Tested: 56 Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Nu,.ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Below Bask (BEL) Buie (BAS) Proficient (PRO) Advanced ( AUV) 154 and below 155-199 200-249 250 and above School_ District Region State School District Region State _ _ School District -Ba!on_ State _School_ District _Region __ State __ All Students 20 184 2,933 9,345 13 106 1,633 5. 567 12 85 I, 620 5,957 11 140 1. 967 7,644 36X 36X 36X 33X 23X 21X 20X 20X 21X 17X 2ox 21X 2ox 27X 24X 27X Gender Fe11a le 11 '12 I, 494 4,756 10 57 845 2.806 44 793 2,958 J 68 953 3,746 3X ,ox 37X 33X 31X 20X 21X 2ox 2sx 16X 19X 21X 9X 24X 23X 26X Male 9 72 1,438 4,582 3 48 785 2,754 4 41 827 2,997 72 I ,011 J, 887 38X 31X 35X 32X 13X 21x 19X 19X 17X ,ex 20X 21X 33X 31X 25% 27% Ethnicity Aslan/Pac1f1c Jslander 0 ' 11 29 0 ' 25 0 ' 39 0 0 16 67 ox 33X 26X 18X ox 33X 19X 16X ox 33X 19X 24X ox ox 37X '2X Afr lean A11er ican 13 153 I. 718 4,413 7 70 504 I, 149 7 \" 327 725 4 43 220 477 42X SOX 62X 6SX 23X 23X ,ex 17X 23X 13X 12X 11x 13X 14X BX 7X lllspan1c 3 3 38 177 ' 2 21 123 J 3 21 118 ' J JO 132 38X 27% 3SX 32X 13X ,ex 19X 22X 3BX 27X 19X 21X 13X 27X 27% ,,x Nat 1 ve A11er 1can 0 0 12 59 0 0 7 41 0 0 3 41 0 0 4 39 ox ox 46X 33X ox ox 27% 23X ox ox 12X 23X ox ox ,sx 22X White 4 27 1,106 4 .581 s 32 1,068 4,178 2 40 1,241 4,987 6 93 I, 662 6,863 24X 14X 22x 22x 29X 17X 21X 20X 12X 21x 24X 24X 3SX X 33X 33X Other 0 0 33 47 0 ' 14 23 0 0 10 19 0 ' 23 36 ox ox 41X 38X ox sox 18X x ox ox 13X ,sx ox SOX 29X 29X Gender/E thn I c 1 ty Fe11a le A t.n/Pctf'1c llnd,. 0 ' ,. 0 0 0 .. 0 0 , ,o 0 0 \" ox ,oox 24X 19X ox ox 24X 19X ox ox ,,x 2SX ox ox 38X 38X African A11erlcan 94 873 2. 225 7 39 274 615 5 21 170 384 2 22 120 252 36X S3X 61X 64X 32X 22X 19X ,ex 23X 12X 12X 11X 9X 13X BX 7X lllspanlc 0 0 18 93 ' ' 9 54 ' ' 9 51 ' 3 18 70 ox ox 33X 3SX 33X 20X 17X 20X 33X 20X 17X 19X 33X 60X 33X 26X Native A11er1can 0 0 7 27 0 0 4 24 0 0 ' 21 0 0 ' 17 ox ox s,x 30X ox ox 31X 27X ox ox BX 24X ox ox BX 19X Whl ta 3 17 571 2. 355 2 16 541 2.077 2 22 600 2,457 0 '2 786 3,343 43X ,ex 23X 23X 29X 16X 22X 20X 29X 23X 24X 24X ox 43X 31X 33X Other 0 0 10 18 0 ' 11 0 0 s 10 0 ' 18 24 ox ox 24X 29X ox SOX 20X 17X ox ox 12X 16X ox SOX 44X 38% Gender/E thn 1c I ty Male As 1an/Pac 1 f 1c 1 s I and er 0 0 6 14 0 ' J 10 0 ' 5 19 0 0 36 ox ox 27X 18X ox SOX 14X 13X ox sox 23X 24X ox ox 36X 46X African A11erlcan 5 59 844 2. 183 0 JO 229 533 2 20 157 34' 2 21 99 223 56X 45X 64X 67X ox 23X 17X 16X 22X 15X 12X ,ox 22X 16X 7X 7X lllspan1c 3 3 20 84 0 ' 12 69 2 2 12 67 0 0 12 62 60X sox 36X 30X ox 17X 21X 24X ox 33X 21X 2,x ox ox 21X 22X Nat Ive A11erlcan 0 0 s 31 0 0 J 17 0 0 2 20 0 0 J 22 ox ox 38X 34X ox ox 23X 19X ox ox ,sx 22X ox ox 23X 24X Whl te ' 10 535 2. 225 3 16 527 2,098 0 18 641 2,530 6 51 874 3,514 ,ox 11X 21X 21X 30X 17X 2ox 2ox ox 19X 2SX 24X 60X s,x 34X 34X Other 0 0 23 29 0 0 6 \" 0 0 s 9 0 0 s 12 ox ox S9X 47X ox ox ,sx 19X ox ox 13X ,sx ox ox 13X 19X Migrant 0 0 3 110 0 0 J 64 0 0 3 41 0 0 2 45 ox ox 27X 42% ox ox 27X 25X ox ox 27% 16X ox ox 18X 17% Al~AP A1kan\\U C'omprchcnsiYTt nting, Assessment \u0026amp;.Accoun11bili1yP1ugram PRIMARY (GR. 4) BENCHMARK EXAMINATION LITERACY SCHOOL SUMMARY REPORT: GENERAL POPULATION Dlstr-tct Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LEA K: 60-02 Total Number of Students Tested: 56 School Name: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Schoo 1 Number: 063 Grade: 04 Date of Test: l\\prtl 2001 Nun.ber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Below Bask (BEL) 178 and below Nunber \u0026amp; Percentage of Students Basic (BAS) 179-199 Nu11ber \u0026amp; Percent\nage of Students Proficient (PRO) Nu111ber \u0026amp; Percentage or Studnnt5 Advanced (ADV) All Students Gender Fe11a le flllale Ethnic tty As 1an/Pac 1 f 1 c Is I and er African A11erlcan Hispanic Native A11er I can 'l'hi te Other Gender /E thn 1c i ty Fe11ale '\" 1 11/Pae 1 r 1 b l t aneu,r African Araerlcan Hispanic Nat Ive A11er I can Whl te Other Gender /E thn le I ty lilale As I an/Pac 1 ft c 1 s I ander African A11erlcan Hispanic Native A11ertcan White Other Migrant _School_ District Region _Slate_ 13 23X 6 19X 7 29X 0 ox 5 16X 4 SOX 0 ox 4 24X 0 ox 0 ox 4 18X 1 JJX 0 ox 1 1,x 0 ox 0 ox 1 11X 3 60X 0 ox 3 JOX 0 ox 0 ox 146 I. 928 6, 162 28% 24% 22x 77 27X 69 JOX 2 67% 121 39X 5 45X 0 ox 18 9X 0 ox 1 100% 69 39X 1 20X 0 ox 6 6X 0 ox 1 SOX 52 ,ox 4 67X 0 ox 12 13X 0 ox 0 ox 795 19X 1,132 28X 6 14X 1. 142 41X 25 23X 8 31X 724 14X 17 21X 10' X 489 34X 11 20X 4 31X 282 11x 4 ,ox 4 18X 653 49X 14 25X 4 31X 442 17% 13 JJX 2 18X 2. 458 17X 3,700 26X 11 7X 2,814 42X 113 21X 45 25X 3,080 15X 22 18X ' 4X 1,219 JSX 40 15X 20 22X I, 161 11x 7 11X 8 ,ox I. 653 sox 73 26X 25 28X I, 918 19X 15 24X 81 31X _School_ District _Region_ State 25 ,sx 15 47X 10 42X 0 ox 17 ssx 3 38X 0 ox 5 29X 0 ox 0 ox 11 SOX 1 JJX 0 ox 3 43X 0 ox 0 ox 6 67X 2 40X 0 ox 2 20X 0 ox 0 ox 194 2 .831 9,930 38X JSX JSX 103 37X 90 39X 1 JJX 118 38X 3 27X 0 ox 70 36X 2 100% 0 ox 62 JSX 1 20X 0 ox 38 39X 2 1oox 1 sox 55 42% 2 JJX 0 ox 32 34X 0 ox 0 ox 1,374 34X 1,454 36X 18 42X 990 36X 39 35X 10 38% I. 726 34X 29 36X 29X 5'6 38X 18 JJX 5 38% 777 31X 13 32X 12 ssx 442 JJX 21 38X 5 38X 949 37X 16 41X 4 36X 4,702 JJX s.in 37X 63 39X 2,422 36X 217 39X 71 39% 7,058 34X 50 ,ox \" 30X 1,317 38X 105 39X 27 JOX 3,187 31X 19 JOX 39 49X 1.100 34X 112 40X 43 48% 3,868 37X 31 SOX 103 ,ox 200-249 _School_ District _Region_ State _ 17 JOX 11 34X 6 25X 0 ox 8 26X 1 13X 0 ox 8 47X 0 ox 0 ox 7 32X 1 JJX 0 ox 3 43X 0 ox_ 0 ox 1 11X 0 ox 0 ox 5 SOX 0 ox 0 ox 167 3.230 11,800 32% 40% 41% 97 JSX 70 30X 0 ox 65 21X 2 18X 0 ox 100 s,x 0 ox 0 ox 45 26X 2 ,ox 0 ox so 52X 0 ox 0 ox 20 15X 0 ox 0 ox 50 sax 0 ox 0 ox 1,813 44X 1,414 35X 17 ,ox 621 22X 43 39X 8 31X 2. 486 49X 32 ,ox 11 52X 394 27X 24 x 4 31X 1,349 54X 22 54X 6 27X 226 17X 19 34X 4 31X I, 135 x 10 26X 5 45X 6,682 47X 5, 106 36X 78 x 1,434 21X 212 39X 64 36X 9,904 48X 50 ,ox .. 60X 921 26X 120 ,sx 42 47X 5,491 s,x 34 s,x 29 37X 512 16X 92 33X 22 24X 4,407 43X 16 26X 72 28X 250 and above _ School_ Ulstr let _Region __ State __ 1 ,x 0 ox I ,x 0 ox 1 3% 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 1 11X 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 8 2X 4 IX 4 2% 0 ox 3 1X 1 x 0 ox ,'x 0 ox 0 ox 0 ox 1 20X 0 ox 3 ,x 0 ox 0 ox 3 2% 0 ox 0 ox 1 1x 0 ox 0 ox 164 2% 103 ax 61 2X 2 sx 16 1X 3 3X 0 ox 1'1 JX 2 JX ,o' x 8 1x 1 2X 0 ox 90 ,x 2 sx 0 ox 8 IX 2 ,x 0 ox 51 2X 0 ox 0 ox 621 ,r, '\" 3X 197 IX 8 sx 34 IX 8 1X 0 ox 567 3X 3 ,x 6X 19 1X 3 1X 0 ox 393 x 3 sx 3 x 15 ox 5 2X 0 ox 174 2X 0 ox 4 2X STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CERTIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 23 ,: , STDFOl /\u0026lt;\n\u0026lt; , NL.itSOO l suu. I!...,..l.opmen~ By n,pic ocation J'.\u0026lt; 'opic Topic 08soription Da.te :oo:i. ~lTIMC 1'0 1'l!Sl1l\\DZ 7/\n/.l/00 1004 FRESH LOOII. AT NUMill-lll-'3 7/0G/00 ::coo, G!!'l.\"l'ING SMAR.Tl!R 7 /10/00 :oo7 SMART S~$:i' 7/ll/On 1:00, nn,\u0026lt;O TO wean ~==s= 7/11/00\n:010 INTRO TO I'O'NEfl ronn 7/13/00 ,l.Oll ELL.\\ llEW Sgs:110Jf 7/18/00 !1015 C0!1!T!W \u0026amp; AFn!:C'I'rvF: CU11p!,CUJ.. U M 8/0l/00 ,'l.0'1.\"l =~ ~ Q/OA/00 Hl1l8 MJ\u0026lt;l!'i\u0026lt;T~ J!ILY 1li, 2,, 27, Ii. 28,2000 7/25/00 11021 SPECI.AL ED SPECIAL Sli01f a/0:1/00 ~1027 FIU\\KS~ l'OR UHDEIISl\"AIIDilllo WVSl'T't 9/04/00 1:036 EOUCAerOltS IN lllD(JS'l'lll' 7/07/00 Zl048 QUICK NOTSS TRAM MTGS K-2 a/Ol/00 21057 CaRJ\\DUXl'Eco m.sl!-CRSL 7305 8/01/00 H0$8 QFp\nCT!W un.= l\"OLLOW-UP 1/12/00 :10~, SP .N!..\"11 T!.l~ OR.Ili:NTATION S/14/00 21061 NP.W Tf'..AC!Ula Ill=VJ:CE ~/J.4/00 210G2 SPECIAL Ell IN5eRVlCC8 6/07/00 21069 Al!A ll./03/Q\u0026lt;\n) l107l GROIIIllG .IO\\l'HEMATICAL IDl!AS KINt\u0026gt;i.:J\u0026lt;!?.Al!TllN 11/3.J/00 :107~ BFLIT\u0026amp;l\\AC'i 't~ ~DIG 1/1-\"l/ln. J:il\u0026gt;91 .l!LLA FOLLOli'-IIP a/10/00\n:\n1t MAK!! 1'ND Tllll 3/23/01 :is\n:, Il\u0026lt;TI\u0026lt;O TO WORD PRDCESSDIG MICROSOFT WOIUl 7 /11/00 21530 INTRODUCTION TO llll.\"NDOWS 95/9S 7/11/00 11i\n34 WORD PII.OOSSING FART i 7/13/00\n)1535 INl'II.ODUCTIO!II TO .POWER ronrr 7il3/00 as ot 10/l.6/0l. I-----ADMDIISTRATOIZS----I-------CilRTIFillD-------1------CLASSIFIE0---- 1 j----MJ\\Lll--- ---FBMALS-- j ----MJ\\LB--- ---FDW-S--j----MAU--- ---n'!-11,LE-- I a W O B W O B W O B W O 3 W O R W 0 l 2 l J l l l ~ 1 .. l l 1 l 1 l. l 2 l .l 2 2 t l 1 1 l 1 1 11/12/01 11:53 TX/RX N0.4991 P.002 - STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CLASSIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 24 DISCIPLINE INFORMATION REFERRALS/ ACTIONS TAKEN (PLEASE ATTACH COMPUTER GENERATED INFORMATION) Page 25 CUMULATIVE .t\\t:.Lt::::J...1..0...L nca.::,vu NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Code Description 01 Disregard for directions of teachers or administrators. o\u0026amp;.sregard for directions of bus drivers, lunch aides, or other ~uthorized school personnel. 03 Disruption and/or interference with the normal and orderly conduct of school \u0026amp; school-sponsored activities. 04 Behavior that involves indecent and/or immoral acts. 05 Wagering or any form of gambling. REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 06 Physical abuse, assault, insult or threatened physical abuse to REF a school employee. STU 07 Physical abuse, assault, insult, or threatened physical abuse to REF another student or any other individual. STU 08 Possession of a (l)knife, (2)razor, (3)ice pick, (4) explosive, REF (5)pistol, (6)rifle, (?)shotgun, (8)pellet gun, (9)mace, (lO)tear gas, STU (ll)pepper spray, or (12) any other object that can be considered a weapon or dangerous instrument. 09 Possession of alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined REF by Arkansas law or School Board Policy\nor using, under the STU influence, offering for sale or selling alcoholic beverages or any narcotic drug as defined by Arkansas law or Board policy. 10 Destruction of or the attempt to destroy school property. REF 11 Stealing or the attempt to steal school property or the property belonging to another individual. 12 Cheating or copying the work of another student. l~ilure to abide by attendance rules. 14 Excessive tardiness to class (Secondary use only). 15 Use of profanity, vulgar language or obscene gestures. STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU REF STU 16 Committing extortion, coercion, blackmail or forcing another REF person to act through the use of force or threat of force. STU 17 Engaging in verbal abuses such as name-calling, ethnic or racial REF slurs, or using derogatory statements to other students, school STU personnel or other individuals. 18 Hazing. REF STU 19 Gang related activities. REF STU 20 Sexual harassment. REF 21 Smoking and/or possession of any tobacco and/or tobacco product paraphernalia. STU REF STU 22 Possession of any paging device, beeper, mobile/cellular REF telephone or similar electronic communication device. STU TOTAL REF STU -------TOTAL------------ Total Pct Par Con Tot 26 19.25% 19 22.35% 11 8.14% 10 11. 76% 89 65.92% 47 55.29% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 6 4.44% 6 7.05% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 1 . 74% 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 85 1.17% .74% 1.17% .74% 1.17% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% .00% 16 12 7 6 44 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 45 1 Ref: DIS013 CUMULATIVE NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARYS CHOOL Code Description O-onference with Student 02 Conference with Parent 03 Conference with Student and Parent 04 Privileges Denied 05 Behavior Contract 06 Detention Hall 07 Student Will Make Up Time 08 Student Placed on Probation 09 Student Assignment Class(SAC) 10 Home Suspension 11 Boys/Girls Club Suspension 12 Alt School Susp (K-6) 13 Bus Suspension lesaturday School 15 Recommended Expulsion 16 Other 17 Expulsions Disciplinary Referral Summary By FILE YE ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS ACTIONS STUDENTS TOTAL ACTIONS STUDENTS Action Taken -------TOTAL-------- -------BLACK---- Total Pct Par Con 26 19.25% 23 21.10% 9 6.66% 7 6. 42% 7 5.18% 6 5.50% 20 14.81% 14 12.84% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 11 8.14% 11 10. 09% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 6 4.44% 6 5.50% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 25 18.51% 19 17.43% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 31 22.96% 23 21.10% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 135 109 11 11 8 6 l 1 13 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 17 0 0 68 59 Total Pct ::\u0026gt;ar 22 16.29% 19 17.43% 8 5.92% 6 5.50% 3 2.22% 3 2.75% 16 11. 85% 11 10.09% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 8 5.92% 8 7.33% 0 . 00% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 3 2.22% 3 2.75% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 20 14.81% 14 12.84% 0 .00% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 23 17.03% 17 15. 59% 0 . 00% 0 . 00% 103 76.29% 81 74.31% COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOMES EVALUATION (COE) SURVEY RESULTS (IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE INSERT AFTER THIS PAGE) Page 26 ANNUAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE INSERT AFTER THIS PAGE) Page 27 Carline Thomas Schedule 2001/2002 7:35-10:15 Language Block (The following are approximate times within the Language block. The time and the activities will change with the days of the week and the needs of the students.) 7:40-8:00 8:00-9:15 9:15-10:00 10:00-10:15 10:15-10:30 10:30-10:50 10:50-11:10 11 :10-11 :45 11:45-12:45 12:45-1:15 1 :15-1 :30 1:30-1:45 1:45-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 Familiar Reading/Journals Attendance/Practice Activities Shared Reading/SharedNocabulary development Writing/Modeled Writing/Individual Writing Activities/ HandwritingNVord Activities/EPSF and BOEHM Skills/ Phonics Activities/Calendar/Read Alouds/Cooking Activities/LEA/Book Activities/ Art Group Work/Story Writing/Journals/Shared Writing/ Interactive Writing/Literacy Comers/ Assessments Read Aloud/Books on Tapes/Music/Poetry Get Ready for Lunch Lunch Recess Familiar reading/ Shared Reading \u0026amp; Writing/Accomplish unfinished work/Art/Author's chair Math Science/Health/Social Studies Read Alouds Snacks Recess and/or Music \u0026amp; Movement Get Ready to go Home Dismiss Bus students Dismiss Daycare students Walk other students outside to dismiss. Library: Monday 11 :45-12:25 PE: Monday and Friday 12:30- 1 :00 Counselor: Every other Wednesday 11 :30- 12:00 ESL-Touchstone Monday and Wednesday 1: 00- 1:30 e Mrs. Tumers'Class Schedule 7:35 Table activity (phonic review,EPSF,Boehm and skills previously learned) Familiar Reading 8:do ABC Phonic Song/Letter March Handwriting Practice Morning News 8:30 Calendar/Weather/ Word Wall Activities Morning Movement(songs, finger plays) Shared Reading (story elements, CAP concepts) Whole Group Table Activity (to develop listening skills and following directions) Shared Writing Phonic Skills Center Activities 10:30 Transition Activities For Lunch 10:40 Lunch/Recess 11 :20 Recess Transition ( quiet time, bathroom, water, finish center work, familiar reading) 12:00 1: 15 1:45 2:00 2:15 2:20 2:25 Teacher Read Aloud Art Activity/Music Math Snack/Unit Study Second Recess/Group Games Dismissal Procedures/ Discuss Today's Leaming Bus Students Dismissed Daycare riders go to cafeteria/Car riders go to pourch End of our day - 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:30 8:30-10:15 Schedule - iv1anoe1 Ya i=,ia-' Seatwork / familiar reading/ previous day's unfinished work. (roll and lunch count taken at this time) Calendar * months / day / year * abc chart * sight words * sentence of the day * Math Their Way skills * Reading Groups ( call groups - 1 at a time) Groups: triangle, square, rectangle, circle * shared reading and writing * guided reading and writing * interactive reading * language centers * BOEHM / EPSF skills 10:15 - 10:25 Get ready for lunch * restroom * wash hands (line students up alphabetically) 10:25 - 11 :05 Lunch (Pick up children at the top of the hill.) 11 :05 - 11 :20 Quite time * water * familiar reading * restroom * unfmished work * music 11:20 - 12:00 Math skills - Math Their Way Concepts and centers 12:00 - 12:35 Letter of the week (practice) 12:35 - 1 :00 Writing - journals 1:00 - 1:35 Unit study/ art/ music 1:35 - 2:00 Snack/ recess/ abc skills (Recess only if you have time) 2:00 2:15 2:20 2:25 Prepare for home Dismiss bus students Send daycare to cafeteria and walk others outside. Dismiss all ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P. _ Jvl~ ~ ~ /:00-1:30 l.Rec. Cev,+er-w ~-\\-h Mrs. ~crma.Q.J) ~ ~ - W~- q:30- /D:IJ5 7:358':15 8':158':45 8':45 9:30 9:30 10:15 I 0: 1 5 1 0:3 0 10:3011:IB 11:15 11:20 11:30 11:30 11:50 11:50 I 2:00 I 2:00 1:00 Monda!J I 2:00 I 2:25 12:30 l:10 1:15 1:45 1:45 2:00 1:00 1:30 1:30 1:40 1:40 2:00 Z:00 2:15 Z:Z0 2:25 Kindergarten Mrs. Paige Wright MorningW ork SkillP ractice,R eview, FamiliarR eadingM, athT ubbing Calendar Evel'IDJ ay Counts Math Silver-Burdett-GiCnunr riculum SharedR eadingA BCC hart,L iteratureP, oetry,S haredW riting Finish Work Clean up Prepare for lunch Use restroom, wash hands Line up in ABC order LUN~ Pick up on playground Restroom Water QuietT ime fmishw ork.r ead quietly,h eads down, Musica ppreciation Listeningto differents tyles of music Read Aloud LiteracyH our Poetry,P honemicA warenessP, honics, Lettero f the Week,C onceptsA boutP rint, Writing 'LiteracyG roups,G uidedR eading, InteractiveW riting LiteracyH our LIBRARY LiteracyH our Snack As students are ready Tuesda!J E vel'JoJ ther week I 2:00 I 2:30COUNSELOR 12:30 I :3 0 LiteracyH our 1:30 1:45 Snack I :4 5 2:0 0 FreeC hoiceo r 2nd Recess IntegratedT hematicA ctivities SocialS tudies,M usicS, cienceA, rt Snackr une DevelopmentaCle nters/FreeC hoiceO R 2nd Recess Cleanu p Preparet o go home Reviewd ay on the carpet, pass out folders, notes, rewards, etc. Bus Bell Bus students go to front hall DaycareB ell Daycares tudentsg ot o cafeteria,a nd neighborhoosdt udentsw ait on front porch Final Bell MRS. A. BURKS FIRST GRADE ROOM9 Morning Schedule 7:35 Children enter, pick up morning work off of reading table 7:40 Line up for bathroom, water fountain 7:50 Finish morning work 8:00 Pledge and announcements 8: 10 Clean table and move to rug for calendar time 8: 15 Calendar time 8:30 Shared Reading 8:45 Spelling 9:10 Move to groups (centers. table work. reading rug, reading table) 9:15-9:35 Group l 9:35-9:55 Group 2 9:55-10:15 Group 3 10:15-10:35 Group 4 10:35 Handwriting or journal writing 10:40 Bathroom/Wash hands : 0:47 Line up in ABC order for lunch (exception-sack lunches first) 10:50 Arrive at lunchroom 11 :30 Pick up children at top of playground ( outside Kindergarten wing) Return through doors nearest office. Stop at water fountains by second grade, then bathrooms, and wash bands 11 :45 Read Aloud Afternoon Schedule Moriday ~d W~~esday -~ 12:00 Computer Lab 12:37 12:40 1:30 2:00 2:15 2:20 :~:25 Tuesday: 12:00 12:30 1: 10 1 :30 2:00 2:15 2:20 2:25 Line up, return to class Math/Every other Wednesday the coW1Selor comes from 12:50 to 1 :20 Writer's Workshop/or Math if the counselor has come at 12:50 Clean-up, move to rug to read books Bus riders dismissed Daycare riders dismissed All children dismissed PE with Miss Webb Library Return to room. read n~w books Math Clean-up, move to rug to read books Bus riders dismissed Daycare riders dismissed All children dismissed 12:00 PE with Miss Webb 12:30 Math 1:30 Art 2:00 Clean-up, move to rug to read books 2:15 f3us riders dismissed 2:20 Daycare riders dismissed 2:25 All children dismissed Et:ri~ay -~ .~. ,.:a~~I 12:00 Math - 1:00 Writer's Workshop 1:30 Music 2:00 Clean-up, move to rug to read books 2:15 Bus riders dismissed 2:20 Daycare riders dismissed 2:25 All children dismissed Miss Cooley's Class Schedule 7:35-7:50 Welcome, Unpack, Familiar Reading 7:50-8 Bathroom 8:00-8:20 Calendar 8:20-8:45 Morning Journals 8:45-9:00 Spelling 9:00-9:15 Handwriting 9:15-10:45 Guided Reading 10:50-11:00 Bathroom and Wash hands 11:00-11:40 Lunch and Recess 11:40-11:50 Bathroom, wash hands, water 11:50-12:20 Read Aloud and Afternoon Activities Activities Monday- Counseling 11:50-12:20 (every other) Tuesday and Thursday - Computer 12-12:37 Wednesday - Library 12:30-1:10 and P.E. 1:30-2 Friday - P.E. 12-12:30 and Music 1:30-2 12:20-1:10 Math 1:10-2 Shared Reading and Writers Workshop 2:00-2:15 Familiar Reading, Packing, and Dismissal 2:15 Buses 2:20 Daycare 2:25 Walkers/Car Riders Miss Joshua's Schedule 7:35-7:55 Familar reading 7: 5 5-8 :05 Bathroom/W aterbreak 8:10-8:40 Spelling 8:40-9:05 Shared reading, ABC charts, and poems 9:05-10:40 LANGUAGE ARTS BLOCK Guided Reading (MWF)/ Assisted Write (Tues./Th) Literacy Comers 10:40-10:50 Bathroom/wash hands prepare for lunch 10:55-11:35 Lunch/recess 11 :40-11 :50 Bathroom/water break 11:50-12:00 Read Aloud 12:00-12:10 Calendar,everyday counts (Fri. P.E. 12:00-12:30) 12:10-1:00 Math (Tues.ffhur. Computer Lab 12:40-1:17) (Mon. Counselor 12:30-1 :00) (Wed. Art 12:30-1:00) 1 :00- 1 : 40 Writer's Workshop (Mon. Library 1 : 15-1: 5 5) (Wed. P.E. 1:30-2:00) (Fri. Music 1 :30-2:00) 1 :40-2:00 Unit Study 2:00 Reflections 2: 15 Dismissal MS.C. WEBB FIRST GRADE - ROOMS CLASS SCHEDULE 7:35-8:00 Familiar Reading (Roll-7:55) 8:00-8:05 Announcements 8:05-8:15 Bathroom 8: 15-8:30 Shared Reading 8:30-8:50 Spelling 8:50-9:00 Explain Seatwork 9:00-9:25 Group 1 9:25-9:50 Group 2 9:50-10:15 Group 3 10:15-10:30 Group 4 10:30-10:40 Bathroom/Line up for lunch 10:45-11 :25 Lunch/Recess 11:25-11:45 Come in from playground/Bathroom 11:45-11:55 Read Aloud 11:55-12:55 Calendar/Math - 12:55-1 :30 Unit Work 1:30-2:10 Writer's Workshop MR. E. WALDORF SECOND GRADE - ROOM7 7:35 - 8:00 Sha:rpen-2 Pencils, Morning Work, Read, Lunch \u0026amp; Attendance 8:00 - 8:15 Everyday Counts Math after announcements 8: 15 - 8:25 Bathroom and drink 8:25 - 8:30 Explanation of Corners and Seat Work 8:30 - 9:00 Reading Group 1 to reading, Reading Group 2 se:uwork. Reading Group 3 to Corners 9:00 - 9:30 Reading Group 1 to Corners, Reading Group 2 to reading. Reading Group 3 seatwork 9:30 - 10:00 Reading Group l se:uwork, Reading Group : to comers. Reading Group 3 to reading l 0:00 - 11 :00 :Vlondays \u0026amp; Wednesdays: Tuesdays: Thursdays \u0026amp; Fridays: lO 00 - 1037 Computer - '0:37 - l 100 D E...\\.R. 10 ! 5 - l0:55 Liorarv l0.00 - 10: 15 DE A .. R. : O 15 - l l 00 \\.\\i rire,'s Wor~shop 11:00 - L2:00 Sarhrocm.. 11::a - t::00 L:r:c:1 \u0026amp; '.Zc.:~~s 12:00 - 12: 15 Bathroom \u0026amp; Drink 12:15-1:00 Math 1:00 - 1:30 Science, Social Studies, or Health 1:30 - 2:00 Writer's Workshop or Art 2:00 - 2: 15 Prepare for going home 2:15 - 2:25 2: 15 - Bus riders dismissed\n2:20 - Daycare dismissed\n2:25 - Walkers/Car Riders Dismissed P.E. and Music P.E. -Thursdays 12:30 - 1:00\nFridays 1:00 - 1:30 Music - Tuesdays 1:30 - 2:00 Mrs. A. Williams' Class Schedule - 7:35-8:00 Sharpen 3 pencils Bathroom D.E.A.R./Bell Work Roll Call 8:00-8:30 Spelling Shared Reading 8:30-10:00 Guided Reading Group I 8:30-9:00 Group 2 9:00-9:30 Group 3 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:30 Social Studies 10:30-11 :00 Science/Health 11 :00-11: 15 Wash Hands Line Up For Lunch - 11:15-11:55 Lunch Recess 11:55-12:15 Drink Bathroom Shared Reading 12:15-1:00 Math Calendar 1:00-2:00 Writer's Workshop 2:00-2:15 Writing: Personal Journals Get ready for home 2:15 Bus Leave 2:20 Daycare Leave - 2:25 Car/Walkers Leave 3:05 Teachers Leave S. \\/ViUiarns 2nd Grade r.u. .i\na ss C,. ,.\nr -h.e5d ' - V i~ u le W!LLL C sc::s:.ux..::::::.sz. ~ WWW Roll Cali. Lunch Count, fv1orn.in.,a, V\\/ork 8:45-9:15 SoeHina ...!. . ',J\n. H C'~r! ,n r, '-'.Jl\"t..-t '-\"' 11 ~ ::f 10:45-11 :05 \\\n\\J,_\nJ,\n__ ~ ' t i V\\flil.lil~ - rt:1~:,vlictl ,\n0Uf\ni8\ni i ,ii: ... ~-~--- .......... ..,, ,...~' ., c_-: ~~\n: .. ~ i L \"t. .. l\n..., 1 !!:: . ~ ,} ~..\nC f--\\ r'\" .,, t ,-.,. I ' ~J (\n(\nta i ,~- ~:.i c: ~\n-l :s Computer Lai:i I '\\ I I ~ a r1 ( l '1~ tJJ a . Counselor .P.i.-.. l\\,1usic Thur. 1 :00 - i :30 -~ ...... !\"'\"\" ..............\n.. :.--,.. - '\n\\ ..\nf \n\n,, ,, ,.,.., '\n-.._ Pilar Woody's 2nd grade schedule 2001-2002 7:35-8:00 Greet students. Math Writing Journal 8:00-8:40 Social Studies* 8:40-8:55 Bathroom 8:55-9:05 Morning Calender (everyday counts) 9:05-9: 15 Shared Read.mg 9: 15-9:30 Spelling 9:30-11: 15 Read.mg Groups ( centers) 11: 15-11:05 Bathroom/lunch/recess 12:05-12:25 Bathroom/water 12 :25-1: 10 ::VIath ::!O-l::30 Writer's ~Ncrkshc!J .. 30-:2:0:5 Language 2:05-2:25 Review Day, pass out papers. pacl\u0026lt;u p, ge! :-eaciyIO 60. * Activity Schedule Monday- 8:00-8:37 Computer 12:00-12:30 P.E. Tuesday- 8:00-8:40 Library Wednesday- 8:00-8:37 Computer Thursday- 1:00-1:30 Music (in Nlrs. S. William's room) Friday- 10:30-11:00 P.E. - 7:35-8:00 8:00-8:30 8:30-9:00 9:00-9:30 9:30-11 :00 11 :00-11 :30 11 :30-11 :45 11 :55-12:35 12:40-1:30 1:30-2:10 2:15 2:20 2:25 COUSELING MEDIA MISS GRISSOM THIRD GRADE ROOM33 PROBLEM OF THE DAY SOCIAL STUDIES SPELLING WRITING READING LANGUAGE READ ALOUD LUNCH AND RECESS MATH SCIENCE BUS STUDENTS LEAVE DAYCARE STUDENTS LEAVE DISMISS ALL OTHERS 9:25-9:55 EVERY OTHER MONDAY 9:30-10:10 WEDNESDAY COMPUTER LAB 9:20-9:57 TUES. \u0026amp; THURS. P.E. MONDAY 1:30-2:00 \u0026amp; THURSDAY 1:00-1:30 Kilgore's Third Grade Schedule Monday 7:35-8:05 morningjouroal 8:05-8:15 calendar 8:15-9:15 reading 9:20-10:00 computer lab 10:00-11 :00 writing workshop 11 :00-11 :40 spelling and language 11 :45-12:25 lunch/recess 12:35-1:20 math 1 :20-1 :30 homework folder 1 :30-2:00 P.E. 2:00-2:25 DEAR Wednesday 7:35-8:05 morning journal 8:05-8:15 calendar 8:15-9:15 reading 9:20-10:00 computer lab l 0:00-10:50 science or social studies 10:50-11 :30 spelling and language 11 :30-11 :45 DEAR 11:45-12:25 lunch/recess 12:40-1 :10 counselor or music 1 : 10-1 :25 writing 1:25-2:10 math 2:10-2:25 homework folder Tuesday and Friday 7:35-8:05 morningjoumal 8:05-8:15 calendar 8:15-9:15 reading 9:15-10:15 writing workshop 10:15-11:00 spelling and language 11:00-11:45 art or DEAR 11 :45-12:25 lunch/recess 12:35-1 :25 science or social studies 1 :25-2: 10 math 2:10-2:25 homework folder Thursday 7 :3 5-8 :05 morning journal 8:05-8:15 calendar 8:15-9:00 reading 9:00-9:30 spelling and language 9:30-10: 10 library 10: 10-11 :00 writing workshop 11 :00-11 :40 science or social studies 11:45-12:25 lunch/recess 12:25-1 :00 DEAR and homework folder 1:00-1:30 P.E. 1:30-2:15 math 7:30 7:30-7:40 7:it0-8:20 8:20-8:40 8:40-9:00 9:00-9:30 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:10 10:10-11:00 11:00-11:40 11:40-12:40 12:40-12:55 12:55-1:25 1:25-2:10 2:10-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 PE Art Music Schedule 2001-2002 Ms. McConnaughhay 3rd Grade Pick Up Students From Cafeteria Restroom Attendance / Lunch Count / Problem of the Day / Everyday Counts Spelling Handwriting Language Science Restroom Break Reading Writing (Soar to Success and Reading Groups) Prepare for Lunch/ Lunch 11:50-12:10 / Recess 12:10-12:30 / Restroom Break 12:30- 12:40 Read a Chapter Book Social Studies Math Prepare To go Home Dismiss Bus Riders Dismiss Daycare Dismiss Car Riders and Walkers Tuesday 12:30-1:00 / Thursday 11:00-11:30 Integrated With Other Subjects Thursday 1:40-2:10 (if Counseling that week) Friday 12:55-1:25 (if no Counseling that week) Computer Lab- Friday 9:20-10:45 Library- Tuesday 9:30-10:10 Counseling- Alternate Fridays 12:45-1:15 Reeves' Third Grade Schedule Monday/Wednesday 7:35-8:05 morningjournal 8:05-8:15 calendar/P.O.D. 8:15-9:15 reading 9:15-10:00 spelling/language 10:00-10:40 writing workshop 10:40-11: 17 computer lab 11:17-11:30 wash for lunch 11 :30-11 :40 DEAR 11:40-12:20 lunch/recess 12:30-1:30 math 1 :30-2:00 science or social studies 2:00-2:25 homework folder/six stars sharpen pencils Tuesday 7:35-8:05 morning journal 8:05-8: 15 calendar/P.O.D. 8: 15-9: 15 reading 9: 15-10: 15 spelling/language/writing 10:15-11:00 science or social studies 11 :00- 11 :40 library 11 :40-12:20 lunch/recess 12:30-1:00 P.E. 1:00-1 :55 math 1 :55-2:05 homework folders 2:05- 2:25 D.E.A.R./ sharpen pencils Thursday 7:35-8:05 momingjournal 8:05-8: 15 calendar/P.O.D. 8:15-9:15 reading 9: 15-10:00 spelling/language 10:00-10:45 writing 10:45-11 :00 D.E.A.R. 11:00-11:30 P.E. 11:40-12:20 lunch/recess 12:30-1:30 math 1:30-2:00 science or social studies 2:00-2:25 homework folder/ six stars, pencils sharpen Friday 7:35-8:05 morningjournal 8:05-8: 15 calendar/P.O.D. 8:15-9:15 reading 9: 15-10:00 spelling/language 10:00-10:30 writing 10:40-11:00 counselor or music 11 :00-11 :40 science or social studies 11:40-12:20 lunch/recess 12:20-12:45 D.E.A.R. 12:45-1:30 math I :30-2:00 art 2:00-2:25 D.E.A.R. e Dombroski Class Schedule 7:35-8:30 AssignmenfNotebook Journal (Problem of the day) 8:30-9:00 Spelling 9:00-9:30 English 9':30-10:45 Reading/Writing 10:45-11:45 Math 11:45-12:10 Science/Social Studies/Health/Bathrooms 12:10-12:50 Lunch/Recess 12:50-1:00 Bathroom/Read to students 1 :00-1 :30 Social Studies/Science/Health 1 :30-2 :00 PE/ Art/Music 2:00-2:25 D.E.A.R./Clean room 2:15 Bus 2 :20 Daycare 2:25 Neighborhood COUNSELOR COMPUTERS MEDIA REC CENTER Every other Wednesday Friday Thursday Wednesday Friday (NO SUBSTITUTES at REC CENTER) 8:05-8:35 8:00-9:15 8:00-8:40 1:00-1:30 1 :30-2:00 7:35-8:00 8:00-9:00 9:30-10:00 10:00-10: 15 10:15-11:00 11:00-11:55 12:00-12:20 12:20-12:40 12:40 12:40-1:10 1:10 1:20-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 10:15-10:55 12:20-2:00 1:30-2:00 11 :00-11 :30 MRS. J. NEWTON 2001-2002 FOURTH GRADE ROOM30 Attendance, lunch count, homework turn in, students are working on practice worksheets and to copy days work in assignment notebook Math/Ms. Fieg (Math Specialist) comes in to work with students in math Reading Bathroom break/students snack time Continue reading Writing/Language Lunch Recess Pick students up from recess/D-hall Spelling Practice, DEAR or I read to students Restroom break Science, Social Studies, or Character Word of the Month Get ready to go home Dismiss bus students Dismiss daycare students Dismiss walkers/riders Library - Monday Computer Lab - Friday P.E. Monday P.E. Friday MRS. C. O'DELL FOURTH GRADE 2001-2002 ROOM21 7:35-8:30 LUNCH COUNT, ASSIGNMENT BOOK, JOURNAL-SOCIAL STIJDIES, MA TH OR FREE WRITING 8:30-8:55 CHECK MATH OR SOCIAL STUDIES JOURNAL 8:55-9:45 MATH- FIEG AND MYSELF 9:45-10:15 SPELLING 10:00 RESTROOM BREAK 10:15-11:30 READING/WR1TING ACTIVITIES 11:30-12:00 ENGLISH 12:00-12:10 PREPARE FOR LUNCH 12:15-12:55 LUNCH AND RECESS 12:55-1 :05 RESTROOM BREAK 1 :05-1 :20 D.E.A.R. OR TEACHER READS 1 :20-2:05 SOCIAL STIJDIES, SCIENCE OR HEAL TH 2:05-2: 15 CLEAN ROOM 2:15 DISMISS BUS STUDENTS 2:20 DISMISS DAY CARE STIJDENTS 2:20 TEACHER WALKS NEIGHBORHOOD STUDENTS TO GATE 2:25 DISMISS NEIGHBORHOOD STIJDENTS 2:25-3:05 PLANNING TIME 11 :20-11 :50 COUNSELOR - EVERY OTHER THURSDAY 10:15-10:55 LIBRARY-EVERY THURSDAY 11 :30-11 :57 COMPUTER LAB-EVERY MONDAY AND WEDNESDAY 1:00-1:30 P.E.-WEDNESDAY 1 :30-2:00 P.E.-FRIDA Y 1:00-1:20 ART OR MUSIC-FRIDAY -- MRS. R THURMAN FOURTH GRADE ROOM23 -J:\nrl::-:,.,\n::_,---------,-\n-M\n--:o~nd--\n-ay:---------------,-\n:TV\n-\n:-ES\n:-D\n:-A-:-:\nY-------------,~W~c:\n:dn:,::,,:o:::v-------------~ 7:35-8 Mon\"ng \\V,,..ic Copy spcll,ng hsT 1n ass19nmenr notcboak. Moth worksheet, 1-k1ndwr,t1ng worksheet. Calendar moth, Problem of the day, Wr-1t1ng JOlTnOI. Po.ss out popus. arrendancc S1'1cken', behavior ST1cker-s, check ho~worl( Pc1n out papen. Progress r-ept Homework chcr-r I 8:00-8:40 (8-9:25 Latr,:.n-r~,:) (8-9 B,vron-Marh) 8:45-9:10 READING (9-9.-20 Byron----campurer) 9:20-9:40 WRITING (9:30-/0:55 Bvran \u0026amp; 3ronaonr~ ot.rce} 9:50-i0:40 MaTh {J0-10:dO lav-en-comour~. 1 (10:30-//:/5 M,r,am-C5l) !0:4C-ll:OO L.!i'=i\u0026lt;A TVRE UNI'.'\" 12:05-12:45 12:45-1:40 Social Studies 1:40-2 LANGUAGE (J:05-J:40 Brandon-resot.rce) 2-2\n15 ACTIVITY (l:40-2:/5 Lat.ren-rt!:SOU\"'Ce) 2:!5-2:25 DISMISSAL Rcadu,9 {9-9:/5 Turor1ng-Mrs. J.lutcmmon} 8-8:05 Activate background knowlcd9C 8:05-8:10 JO\u0026lt;rnol 8:10-8:20 vocabulary 8:20--8:30 workbook 8:30-8:35 pre.view and predict 8:35--8:50 read the S1'ory 8:50--8:55 rcflecr 8:55-9:05 summary together 9:05-9:15 end of selection test 9:50-W problem of The: dav 10-10:10 Ten minure maTh 10:10-10:30 lesson 10:30-10:40 proc~ice: worksne:er Sc:e:rce Language 11:40-11:50 lesson 11:50-12 practice LUNCH/RECESS Soc10l Stud,es (12:45-2:15 \u0026lt;:\n=r: Bru. Laa, \u0026amp; Chr,sr,an) 12:45-12:50 graphic organizer 12:50-1:10 lesson 1:10-1:20 workshec:T 1:20-1:30 ger re.adv To go home take: home: folder Take rlome: a\"19nmenr noTebaak To be s1gne~ pack backpacks 1:30-2:!5 P. E. 2: 15 bus r,den- picked up 2:20 dav care picked up ,.\n,s:: ~-:1\u0026lt;,o ,,.:r --d~ 'lnd 41ofker\"1t\"o - ..e 'encz CHECX Tgkc Home Fojdcr Asl:'9!?!\"lcnT Note.book Cor.,purer: moth Reading 8:45-8:55 vocabulary rcv,cw 8:55-9:05 workbook 9:05-9:15 vocooulorv qurz Wr,r1ng Wor-ksnop 9:15-9:25 1nrroduce. prompT 9:25-Y:35 analvze promoT I I l1brarv 8:40-9:!0 counsclo- -everv orher week {9-9:30 :-uror,11!'-~ \u0026gt;-lurcnmson) Wr1Tr\"9 Wcrl(snop 9:10-9:40 respono -: -,e\n::romor 9:40-9:~C ,?QIT I f1,1peo: f wr1nr19,\n:~reqorre.s. ~ua1e.nce I 9:35-9:50 pre-wrrTe 9:50-10 problem of :-he :iov 10-JO:lO ten mmufe. moth 10:!0-IC:30 lesson 10:30-!0:40 proc~rce wor-.:snec .5c:e.ncz: I1:10-!J:30 lesson 11:30-11:40 sk,11 IJ:40-!l:50 wor1\u0026lt;0ook toqe.thcr 11:50-12 concept wort\u0026lt;book pa9e LUNCH/RECESS Soc,al Srud,e.s 12:45-12:50 graphic organizer 12:50-1:10 lesson 1:10-1:20 worksiiceT 1:20-1:30 sk,ll lc.sson 1:30-1:40 skill worksheer Longuo9e J:40-1:50 lesson J:50-2 practice ART 2:!5 bus rider~ p1ckea up 2:20 dav care\n:uckca up 2:2~ T'Jl\u0026lt;C c~ r,der-s: 'Jnd ...,o,ke--,-: , rhe 'fl!nce I ' 9:50-10 ~:ote:m of -e: ::av I 10-10:10 en minute -or:, I i0:!0-tC:.\nC lesson I !0:30-IO:.!C oracc-e ..,c,..'\u0026lt;sne:e:r il:!C-!I:2C o?SSOn 11:30-11:-'C s1e11f 11:50-12 c:nce:or wor,\n::oK pa9e: ! I LUNCH/RE\".:55 12:45-12:50 g-aph,c :r:~1zer 12:50-1:JO lesson 1:10-1:20 wCr'lCShce:r 1:30-1:40 sKril workr,---\nLanguage 1:40-1:50 lesson Music 2: 15 bus ricers p1cKc: _:\n2:20 :1ov c:::r'! :,,eke::: .::. 2:2~ ?1,ke ,:7 --:aers ~i: ..,.-:::JkerT\"So' ~tie\nence: I -1 I . { :,, Thu-sdav Fr1dov Notes M\"'\n\"9 Worl\u0026lt;, Copy spelling assignment notebook, Math ..sheet, ~ndwr,ting worksheet, jndar moth, Problem of the day, r,ring JOl.Tnal. Pass out papers. dance sT1ckers, behavior e.rs, check homework 8:00-'3:40 Computer: reading odd dotes Reading (8-9:25 La1rt:n-re..so1.ra) Language even dotes r 8-8:10 skill review {8-9 Byron-Morh) \\. 8:10-8:20 skill practice 8:20-8:45 benchmark re1ease/ hoftstic assessment 8:45-9 re.view multiple choice. ~uest1ons 9-9:15 review open response 8:45-9:10 Reading READING \\ 8:45-9 introduce skdl {9-9:,?0 Byron-compurer) 9-9:15 workbook skill page together 9:20-9:40 (9:/5-/0:25 Qlll!sr: Lodi, Brt:r \u0026amp; Chr1sr1on WRITING {9:30-/0:55 Byron \u0026amp; Brondon-rt: soi.ra} : 9:50-i0:40 Moth 9:50-10 pr-oblem of the dav 9:50- 10 problem of the dav (/0-10:dO Lo1.ren-compurer) 10-10:10 ten mrnute math 10-10:10 ren m1nu-re rnorh {/0:30-/ /:/5 M1r1om-ESL) 10:10-10:30 lesson 10:10-10:30 lesson 10:30-10:40 prac-r,ce workshee-r 10:30-10:40 pracnce worksneet 10:40-11:00 LITERATURE UNIT -c1ence Science {ll-/1:?0 QU#!sr: Ladt. Brt:r. \u0026amp; Chr,sflan) 11-11:30 P E I l l- I I: IO octtvIty ! 11:10-11:30 lesson 11:30-1140 skill I Science I 11:40-tl:50 workbook together 11:50-!2 concept workbook page 11:30-1 !:40 Vocooulorv quiz I IJ:40-i2 Chapter review :2:G:-:245 LUNCH/RECESS LUNCH/RECESS : 12:45-l:40 Social Studies Social Studies Social Studies (IC:40-2 -:omour~r-~,vr:in. . 12:45-12:50 graphic orgomzer Newron) 12:50-1:10 lesson 12:45-12:50 graphic organrzer 1:10-1:20 worksheet 12:50-1:10 lesson i 1:20-1:30 skill lesson \\:l0-1:20 worksheet 1:30-1:40 skill worksheet 1:20-1:30 sktU lesson 1:30-1:40 skill worksheet 1:40-2 Language Language c.ANGUAGE 1:40-1:50 lesson 1:40-1:50 lesson (J:05-/:40 Brandan-resolr'Ce) 1:50-2 prac-rIce J:50-2 practice 2-2:15 Acr1vrry Character Ed D. E. A.R. (!:40-2:15 La,ren-resovce) Drop Everything and Read I I -~AL 2:15 bus riders picked up 2:15 bus riders picked up 2:20 day care picked up 2:20 dav care picked up 2:25 take car riders and walkers to the fence 2:25 Take car riders and walkers TO the fence Bingham Class Schedule 2001 - 2002 Fifth Grade, Room 28 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 7:35 - 8:00 ASSIGN. BOOKS 7:35 - 8:00 ASSIGN. BOOKS 7:35 - 8:00 ASSIGN. BOOK 7:35 - 8:00 ASSIGN. BOOK 7:35 - 8:00 ASSIGN. BOOK 8:00 - 9:10 MATH 8:00 - 9:10 MATH 8:00 - 9:10 MATH 8:00 - 9:10 MATH 8:00 - 9:10 MATH 9:10 - 9:40 SPNOC 9:10 - 9:40 SPNOC 9:10 - 9:40 .SPNOC 9:10 - 9:40 SPNOC 9:10 - 9:30 SPNOC TEST 9:40 - 9:50 BREAK 9:40 - 9:50 BREAK 9:40 - 9:50 BREAK 9:40 - 9:50 BREAK 9:30 - 9:40 BREAK 9:50 - 10 :50 READING 9:50 - 10 :50 READING 9:50 - 10 :50 READING 9:50 - 10 :50 READING 9:40 - 10:40 READING 10:50 - 11 :00 LA 10:50 - 11 :00 LA 10:50-11:00 LA 10:50 - 11 :00 LA 10:40 - 10:50 LA 11 :00 - 12:00 WRITING 11 :00 - 11 :20 WRITING 11 :00 - 11 :40 WRITING 11 :00 - 11 :20 WRITING 10:50 - 11 :50 WRITING 12:00 - 12:30 ENGLISH 11 :20 - 12:00 COMP LAB 11 :45 - 12:25 LIBRARY 11 :20 - 12:00 COMP LAB 11 :50 - 12:30 ART/MUSIC 12:00- 12:30 WRITING 12:00 - 12:30 WRITING 12:35 -1:15 LUNCH 12:35-1:15 LUNCH 12:35-1:15 LUNCH 12:35-1:15 LUNCH 12:35-1:15 LUNCH 1:20-2:10 SOC ST 1:20-2:10 SCIENCE 1 :20 - 2:10 SOC ST 1:20-2:10 PE 1 :20 - 2: 10 SCIENCE EVERY OTHER MONDAY OCT., JAN. \u0026amp; APR. 11 :00 - 11 :20 WRITING 8:00 - 8:50 MATH 11 :20 - 11 :50 COUNSELOR 8:50 - 9:10 SPNOC TEST 11 :50 - 12:30 WRITING 9:10 - 9:50 ART/MUSIC 9:30 - 9:40 BREAK 9:50 - 10:45 READING 10:50 - 11 :30 COMP LAB 11 :30 - 12:30 WRITING MONDAY 7,:35-8:00 8:45-9:25 9:25-10:00 10:00-10: 15 10:15-11:00 11 :00-12: 15 12:15-1:05 1 :05-1: 10 1: 10-2:00 2:00-215 2:15 2:20 2:25 TUESDAY 7:35-8:00 8:00-8:40 8:40-9:17 9:17-10:00 10:00-10:15 10:15-11:00 11 :00-11 :40 11 :40-12:25 12:25-1:05 1:05-1 :30 1:30-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 MS. C. YOUNG 2001-2002 FIFTH GRADE ROOM20 PROBLEM OF THE DAY SCIENCE - **8:15-9:15 COUNSELOR SOCIAL STUDIES SNACK/JOURNAL MUSIC SPELLING LUNCH/RECESS RES1ROOM MATH DEAR DISMISS BUS STUDENTS DISMISS DAYCARE STUDENTS DISMISS WALKERS/RIDERS PROBLEM OF THE DAY READING (WHOLE GROUP) COMPUTER LAB* SOCIAL STUDIES SNACK JOURNAL SCIENCE READING (SMALL GROUP) LANGUAGE LUNCH/RECESS MATH P.E.* DEAR DISMISS BUS STUDENTS DISMISS DAYCARE STUDENTS DISMISS WALKERS/RIDERS *CHECK WITH MS. SMITH ABOUT P.E. - SUB. CAN NOTT AKE STUDENTS TO THE REC. ALONE. SUB. MUST STAY WITH CLASS FOR P.E. WEDNESDAY 7:35-8:00 8:00-8:45 8:45-9:25 9:25-10:00 10:00-10: 15 10:15-11:00 11 :00-11 :45 11 :45-12:25 12:25-1 :05 1:05-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 THURSDAY 7:35-8:00 8:00-8:40 8:40-9:17 9:17-10:00 10:00-10:15 10:15-10:55 10:55-11:55 11:55-12:25 1:05-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 FRIDAY 7:35-8:00 8:00-8:40 8:40-9:20 9:20-10:00 10:00-10:15 10:15-11:00 11 :00-11 :30 PROBLEM OF THE DAY SPELLING LIBRARY SCIENCE SNACK/JOURNAL SOCIAL STUDIES READING LANGUAGE LUNCH/RECESS MATH DEAR DISMISS BUS STUDENTS DISMISS DAYCARE STUDENTS DISMISS WALKERS/RIDERS PROBLEM OF THE DAY SCIENCE COMPUTER LAB SOCIAL STUDIES SNACK/JOURNAL READING LANGUAGE SPELLING PRE-TEST (PLEASE CHECK \u0026amp; RETURN KEEP lO0'S, THEY CAN EXCHANGE \u0026amp; CHECK) MATH DEAR DISMISS BUS STUDENTS DISMISS DAYCARE STUDENTS DISMISS WALKERS/RIDERS PROBLEM OF THE DAY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES ART/MUSIC -CHECK PLAN BOOK JOURNAL/SNACK LANGUAGE SPELLING TEST 11:30-12:00 12:00-12:25 12:25-1:05 1:05-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:20 2:25 P.E. * DEAR LUNCH/RECESS MATH READ \u0026amp; HA VE STUDENTS PASS OUT WEEKS PAPERS DISMISS BUS STUDENTS DISMISS DAYCARE STUDENTS DISMISS WALKERS/RIDERS *CHECK WITH MS. SMITH ABOUT P.E. - SUB. CAN NOT TAKE STUDENTS TO THE REC. ALONE. SUB. MUST STAY WITH CLASS FOR P.E. - Mrs. Smith Schedule 2001-2002 MONDAY \u0026amp; FRIDAY 7:45-8:00 Take Attendance 8:00-8:20 Problem of the Day 8:20-8:50 Spelling 8:50-9:10 Bathroom Break 9:10-9:55 Reading 9:55-10:25 Language Arts 10:25-10:50 Writing 10:50-11:20 Social Studies 11:20-12:10 Math 12:10-12:25 Bathroom Break 12:30-1:10 Lunch/Recess 1:10-1:20 Bathroom Break 1:20-1:50 Science/Heal ff!. 1:50-2:15 DEAR 2:15- Bus Students 2:20 Daycare/Walkers/Car Riders Mrs. Smith Schedule - 2001-200-2 TUESDAY \u0026amp; WEDNESDAY 7:45-8:00 Take Attendance 8:00-8:20 Problem of the Day 8:20-8:50 Spelling 8:50-9:10 Batl1r0Qm Break 9:10-9:55 Reading 9:55-10:25 Language Arts 10:25-10:50 Social Studies/Science 10:40-11:17 Computer Lab/Counselor - 11:17-12:05 Matll- 12:05-12:20 Bathroom Break 12:30-1:10 Lunc/1/Recess 1:15-1:25 Bathroom Break 1:25-2:00 PE/ART/MUSIC 2:15 B.us students 2:20 Daycare/Car riders/Walkers- 2:15- Bus Students 2:20 Daycare/Walkers/Car Riders - Mrs. Smith Schedule - 2001-2002 THURSDAY 7:45-8:00 Take Attendance 8:00-8:20 Problem of the Day 8:20-8:50 Spelling 8:50-9:10 Bathroom Break 9:10-9:55 Reading 9:55-10:25 Language Arts 10:25-10:50 Social Studies/Science 10:40-11:17 Computer Lab/Counselor 11:17-12:05 Math 12:05-12:20 Bathroom Break 12:30-1:10 Lunch/Recess 1:15-1:25 Bathroom Break 1:25-2:00 Science/Health 2:15 Bus students 2:20 Daycare/Car riders/Walkers 2:15- Bus Students 2:20 Daycare/Walkers/Car Riders 7:35-7:45 7:45-10:45 10:45-11 :00 11 :00-12:00 12:00-12:50 12:50-1:15 1 :15-2:00 12:45-1:30 1 :30-2:00 2:00-2:15 2:15 2:35-3:05 Schedule Jennifer Beranek Prep. for Model Classes In Joshua or Cooley's Room Reflection Log Lunch/Planning Time Work with a small group not in model class for professional growth. Reflection Log, Prepare for Writers Workshop Writers Workshop Monday Cooley Tuesday Joshua Wednesday Joshua Thursday Cooley Friday Webb or Burks Friday Organize and inventory books and materials in book room for K-3 teachers. Reflection log Duty Planning except on Wednesday. Literacy Team meetings on Wednesday. SCHEDULE for Barbara Culpepper 7:45 - 8:30 - First grade literacy group 8:30 - 9:10 - Second grade booster group 9:10 - 10:00 - Reading Recovery 10:00 - 10:20 - Travel to North Heights 10:20 - 11:05 - Reading Recovery 11:05 - 11:45 - Lunch 11 :45 - 12 :20 - Reading Recovery 12:20 - 12:55 - Reading Recovery 12:55 - 1:30 - Reading Recovery 1:30 - 2:05 - First grade literacy group 7:35-8:00 MRS. C. FIEG 2000-2001 MTL ROOM29 PLANNING FOURTH GRADE TIME SLOTS 8:00-8:50 8:55-9:45 9:50-10:40 10:45-11 :35 11 :35-12:35 NEWTON O'DELL THURMAN DOMBROSKI LUNCH/PLANNING - TIIlRD GRADE TIME SLOTS 12:35-1:20 1:25-2:10 GRISSOM - FIRST SEMESTER REEVES - SECOND SEMESTER MCCONNAUGHHAY - FIRST SEMESTER KILGORE - SECOND SEMESTER MRS. C. HUTCIDNSON TUTORING ROOM#12 MONDAY \u0026amp; WEDNESDAY 9:00-9:30 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:30 11 :00-11 :30 THURMAN DOMBROSKI O'DELL NEWTON TUESDAY \u0026amp; THURSDAY 8:00-8:30 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:30 BINGHAM YOUNG SMITH MRS. C. HUTCHINSON COMPUTER LAB 2001-2002 ROOM 12 N MONDAY AND WEDENESDA Y 8:00-8:37 WOODY 8:40-9:17 S.WILLIAMS 9:20-9:57 KILGORE 10:00-10:37 WALDORF 10:40-11:17 REEVES 11 :20-11 :57 O'DELL 12:00-12:37 BURKS 12:40-1: 17 WEBB PLANNING TIME BUS DUTY MRS. C. HUTCHINSON COMPUTER LAB 2001-2002 ROOM 12 TUESDAY AND THURSDAY 8:00-8:37 THURMAN 8:40-9:17 YOUNG 9:20-9:57 GRISSOM 10:00-10:37 A. WILLIAMS 10:40-11:17 SMITH 11 :20-11 :57 BINGHAM 12:00-12:37 COOLEY 12:40-1:17 JOSHUA PLANNING TIME BUS DUTY 8:00-8:25 8:25-8:50 8:50-9: 15 9:20-9:45 9:45-10:10 10:10-10:45 10:50-11 :30 11 :35-12:40 12:40-1: 10 1:10-1:35 1:35-2:00 MRS. C. HUTCHINSON COMPUTER LAB 2001-2002 ROOM 12 DOMBROSKI - READING DOMBROSKI - MA TH DOMBROSKI - LANGUAGE MCCONNAUGID-IA Y - READING MCCONNAUGID-IAY-MATH MCCONNAUGID-IAY-LANUAGE 5TH GRADE (ALTERNATE) SMITH - SEPT., DEC., MAR. BINGHAM - OCT., JAN., APR. YOUNG - NOV., FEB., MAY LUNCH \u0026amp; PLANNING TIME NEWTON - READING NEWTON - MATH NEWTON - LANGUAGE READING RECOVERY/EARLY LITERACY SCHEDULE - JORGENSON 8:00- 8:50 Group 1 8:50- 9:40 Group 2 9:40-10:30 Group 3 10:30 - 11 :00 Reading Recovery 11 :00 - 11 :40_ Lunch 11:40-12:15 Reading Recovery 12:15-12:50 Reading Recovery 12:50-1:25 Reading Recovery 1 :25 - 2:10 Reading Recovery 2:15 Hall Duty 8:00-9:30 9:30-11 :00 11 :00-12:25 12:25-1:05 l :05-1 :40 1 :40-2: 15 MRS.D.LEE 2001-2002 RESOURCE ROOl\\1127 READING-LA.i'-l\"GUAGAER TS READING-LANGUAGE ARTS READING-LA.i\"\"TGUAGAER TS LUNCH i\\tfATH ivlATH 7:00 - 7:30 7:30 - 8:00 8:00 - 12:20 12:20 - 1:00 1:00 - 2: 15 2:15 - 3:05 MRS. D. SETTLES ROOM2 INTERVENTION CAFETERIA DUTY HALL DUTY INTERVENTION/TUTORING LUNCH INTERVENTION/TUTORING BUS DUTY 8:00-9:25 9:30-10:55 11 :00-12 :25 12:25-1 :05 1 :05-1 :40 1 :40-2: 15 MRS. V. STEADMAN 2001-2002 RESOURCE ROOMl READING GROUP 1 READING GROUP 2 READING GROUP 3 LUNCH MATH GROUP 1 MATHGROUP2 I 8:00-8:15 8:15-8:55 9:00-9:40 9:45-10:25 10:30-11:15 11:30-12:15 12:30-1:10 1:15-1:45 1:50-2:15 2:15 MRS. M. TOUCHSTONE ESL 2001-2002 ROOM29 SPANISH WORD OF THE DAY GROUP I/FIRST GRADE - MON. \u0026amp; WED. GROUP 2/FIRST GRADE - TUES \u0026amp; THURS. FIRST GRADE TUTORING - FRI. GROUP I/SECOND GRADE - TUES \u0026amp; THURS. GROUP 2/SECOND GRADE - MON. \u0026amp; WED. SECOND GRADE TUTORING - FRI. GROUP 1/fHIRD GRADE - MON. \u0026amp; WED. GROUP 2/fHIRD GRADE - TUES. \u0026amp; TffiJRS. TIDRD GRADE TUTORING - FRI. LEVEL I FIFTH GRADE - MON., WED., \u0026amp; FRI. FIFTH GRADE TUTORING - TUES. \u0026amp; THURS. LUNCH KINDERGARTEN -MON.-THURS. SWOD - FIR.DAY PARENT CONT ACT - MON., WED., \u0026amp; FRI. TRANSLATIONS - TUES. \u0026amp; THURS. ESL BUS DUTY I 8:00-8:30 8:30-9:00 9:00-9:30 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:30 10:30-11 :00 MS. P. SHOEMAKER SPEECH 2001-2002 ROOM3 GROUP 1 GROUP2 GROUP3 GROUP4 GROUP 5/MEDICAID GROUP 6 ON TIJESDA Y AND THURSDAY I 7:40 - 3:00 8:00 - 8:30 9:00 - 9:30 9: 30 - 10:00 10:00 - 10: 30 10:30 - 10:45 10:45 - 11:25 11: 30 - 12 :00 12:00 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 1: 30 - 2: 15 2: 15 MRS. M. WILLARD ROOMS 1 7 , 16 , 15\nAND 14 TITLE I AIDE . HELP SETTLE IN CHILDREN AND WHERE NEEDED WRIGHT VARGAS. THOMAS TURNER LAP READING HELP GET READY FOR LUNCH LUNCH TURNER THOMAS VARGAS WRIGHT PLANNING TIME BUS DUTY DAILY I 7:35 - 12:20 12:20 - 1:00 1:00 - 2:00 2:15 - 3:05 MRS. C. WOODS TITLE I AIDE LYNCHD RIVE/LUNCH/TRAVEL INTERVENTION EARLY SUCCESS GROUPS BUS DUTY I tvlARY WALKER/LINDA CHANCELLOR COUNSELORS ROOM4 2001 -2002 GRADES K-2 (FIRST WEEK CLASSES) WILL tvIEET ON THE FOLLOWING WEEKS: SEPT. 3 DEC. 10 APR. 1 SEPT. 17 JA.i'-l\"1. APR. 15 OCT. 1 JA.i'-l\"1.4 APR. 29 OCT. 15 JA.i'-l\"2.8 i\\tIAY 13 OCT. 29 FEB. 11 NOV. 12 FEB. 25 NOV. 26 MAR. 11 GRADES 3-5 (SECOND WEEK CLASSES) WlLL MEET ON THE FOLLOWING WEEKS: SEPT. 10 DEC. 17 APR. 3 SEPT. 24 JA.i'-T7. APR. 22 OCT. 8 J_-\\.:-1:1 , :vL-\\Y 6 OCT. 22 FEB.4 1'vL-Y\\. .20 NOV.5 FEB. 18 NOV. 19 MAR.4 DEC.3 1'1AR. 18 YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED WHEN CLASSES MUST BE CA.i'-l\"CELLED DUE TO TESTING, ILLNESS OR COUNSELING EMERGENCIES. I M. Walker Counseling Schedule 8-24-0 l North Heights Elementary School FIRST WEEK SCHEDULE/ Lower Grades MONDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:40 8:40 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 I 0:05 - l 0:35 10:35 - I 1:00 11:05-11:45 11 :50 - 12:20 12:30 - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 l :35 - 2:05 2:05 - 2:15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 TTJESDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:40 8:40 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:50 10:50 - 11 :30 11:30 - 11 :55 12:00 - 12:30 12:40-1:10 1:10 - 1:30 I :35 - 2:05 2:05 - 2:15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Observations/ Parent Conferences Planning Time Student Needs Assistance/ Individual Counseling A. WILLIA.iv!S' CLASS - SECOND GRADE Individual Counseling Lunch Time COOLEY'S CLASS - FIRST GRADE JOSHUA'S CLASS - FIRST GRADE Individual Counseling Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R. Other Couneling Duties Teacher Consultations/ Parent Conferences Bookstore Duty Parent Conferences/ Individual Counseling Observations/ Phone Outreach Planning Time Student Needs Assistance:' Individual Counseling Lunch Individual Counseling WRlGHTS CLASS - KINDERGARTEN TURNER'S CLASS - KINDERGARTEN Individual Counseling Small Group Counse!ing D.E.A.R.. Front Hall Duty Staff Meeting WEDNESDAY [Mrs. Walker] [Ms. Chancellor] 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:45 8:45 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:50 10:50 - 11:30 I I :35 - 12:05 12: 10 - 12:45 12:50 - 1:20 I :30 - 2:05 2:05 - 2:15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Parent Converences/ Observations Phone Outreach/ Individual Counseling Planning Time Individual Counseling Lunch WEBB'S CLASS - FIRST GRADE Individual Counseling BURK'S CLASS - FlRST GRADE Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R.. Other Counseling Duties Parent Conferences/ Teacher Consultations 9:20 - 9:50 11:20 - 11:50 2001-2002 VARGAS' CLASS - KIND. THOMAS' CLASS - KIND. I FIRST WEEK SCHEDULE CONTINUED THURSDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:40 8:40 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:40 10:40 - 11:20 11 :20 - 11 :50 11:50 - 1:30 1:35 - 2:05 2:05-2:15 '.:: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 FRlDAY 7:35 - 8:00 3:05 - 8:35 3:45-9:15 9:20 - 10:00 10:05 - 10:35 10:35-11:15 11:15-11:55 12:00 - 12:40 12:40 - l :20 1:20 - 2:05 2:00 - 2: 15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Parent Conferences/ Individual Counseling Observations/ Phone Outreach Planning Time Individual Counseling Lunch Student Needs Assistance Individual Counseling Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R. Front hall duty Parent Conferences/ Teach er Consultations Bookstore Duty WOODY'S CLASS - SECOND GRADE S. WILLIAMS' CLASS - SECOND GRADE Observations/ Individual Counseling WA LDOR..,\n-,SC LASS - SECOND GRADE Planning Time Lunch Home Visits/ Phone Outreach Individual Counseling Student Recognition/ Individual Counseling D.E.A.R. Other counseling duties Parent conferences/ Teacher Consultations I M Walker Counseling Schedule 8-24-01 North Heights Elementary School 2001 - 2002 SECOND WEEK SCHEDULE MONDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:05 - 8:35 8:45 - 9:15 9:25 - 9:55 10:10 - 10:30 10:30- 11:10 11 :20 - 11 :50 11 :50 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:30 1:35 - 2:05 2:00 - 2:15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 TUESDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:40 8:40 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:40 10:40- 11:00 11:00 - 11:40 11:40- 12:40 12:40 - 1:30 I :35 - 2:05 2:05 - 2:15 2:15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Parent Conferences/ Observations YOUNG'S CLASS - FIFTH GRADE GRISSOMS CLASS - THIRD GRADE Student Needs Assistance/ Individual Counseling Lunch BINGHAM'S CLASS - FIITH GRADE Planning Time Individual Counseling Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R. Other counseling duties Parent conferences/ Teacher Consultations Bookstore Duty Parent Conferences/ Individual Counseling Observations/ Phone Outreach Planning Time Individual Counseling Student Needs Assistance Lunch Home Visits/ Individual Counseling Individual Counseling Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R. Front Hall Duty Staff Meeting WEDNESDAY (Mrs. Walker] [Ms. Chancellor] 7:35 - 8:00 8:05 - 9: 15 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:35 10:40 - 11:10 11:10-11:50 12:55 - 12:35 12:40 - 1:10 1:10-1:30 l :35 - 2:05 2:05 - 2:15 2: 15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Observations/ Ind. Counseling Planning Time Individual Counseling 8:05 - 8:35 8:50 - 9:20 SMIIBS CLASS - FITTH GRADE Lunch Planning Time KILGORE'S CLASS - THIRD GRADE Individual Counseling Small Group Counseling D.E.A.R. Other Counseling Duties Parent Conferences/ Teacher Consultations DOMBROSKI'S CLASS - FOURTH GR. THURMAN'S CLASS- FOURTH GR. I SECOND WEEK SCHEDULE CONTINUED THURSDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:40 8:40 - 9:20 9:20 - 10:00 10:00 - 10:35 10:40-11:10 11:20 - 11:50 11 :55 - 12:35 12:35 - 1:30 1:35 - 2:05 2:05-2:15 2:15 - 2:30 2:30 - 3:05 FRIDAY 7:35 - 8:00 8:00 - 8:30 8:30- 9:10 9:10 - 9:40 9:40 - 10:35 10:40 - 11:10 11:15 - 11:55 12:00 - 12:40 12:45 - 1:15 1:20 - 2:00 2:00-2:15 2: 15 - 3:05 Bookstore Duty Parent Conferences/ Individual Counseling Planning Time Phone Outreach/ Observations Individual Counseling NEWTON'S CLASS - FOURTH GRADE O'DELL'S CLASS - FOURTH GRADE Lunch individual Counseling Small Group Counseling O.E.A.R. Front hall duty Parent Conferences/ Teacher Consultations Bookstore Duty CHAMPS Planning Time Student Needs Assistance Individual Counseling REEVES' CLASS-THIRD GRADE Lunch Home Visits/ Phone Outreach MCCONNAUGHHA Y'S CLASS - THIRD GRADE Student Recognition/ Individual Counseling 0.E.A.R. Teacher Consultation - Quest Schedule. North Heights/ Amboy /Glenview 2001-2002 Monday-North Heights 7:35-8:00 8: 00-9: 15 9:20-10:35 10:40-12:00 12:00-12:40 12:45-2:15 2:15-3:05 Hall Duty/Planning Group Study-Third Grade Group Study-First/Second Grades Group Study-Fourth Grade Lunch Group Study-Fourth Grade Bus Duty/Hall Duty/Planning Time Tuesday-Amboy /NORTH HEIGHTS 7:35-8:00 8:00-9:15 9: 15-10: 30 10:30-11:00 11:00-12:15 12:15-12:55 1:00-2:15 2:15-3:05 Hall Duty/Planning Math Olympiad/Fifth Grade Math Olympiad/Fourth Grade Close/Travel to North Heights Group Study-Fifth Grade Lunch Whole Group-Third Grade Bus Duty/Hall Duty/Planning Time Wednesday-North Heights 7:35-8:00 8:00-9:15 9:20-10:30 10:35-12:00 12:00-12:40 12:40-1:45 1:45-2:15 2:15-3:05 Hall Duty/Planning Math Olympiad-Fourth Grade Problem Solving-Third Grade Math Olympiad-Fifth Grade Lunch Problem Solving-First/Second Independent Study/Production Bus Duty/Hall Duty/Planning Time Thursday-Glenview\nNORTH HEIGHTS 7:35-8:00 8:00-9: 15 9:15-10:00 10:00-10:30 10:30-11:00 11\\:00-12:20 12:20-1:00 1:00-2:15 2:15-3:05 Planning Math Olympiad-Fifth Grade Problem Solving-Fourth Grade Independent Study/Production Close and travel to North Heights Math Olympiad-Fourth Grade Lunch Independent Study/Production Bus Duty/Hall Duty/Planning Friday-North Heights 7:35-8:00 8:00-9:10 9:15-10:25 10:25-11:45 11:45-12:25 12:25-2:15 Hall Duty/Planning Whole Group- First/Second Grade Whole Group-Fourth Grade Whole Group-Fifth Grade Lunch Planning/Due Process Alternate Friday afternoons at Amboy, Glenview, and North Heights. Day Monday Tuesd:1y \\Vednesday Thursday Friday FINAL COPY Rec Center PE Schedules 2000 - 2001 Time 12:00 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 1:30 - 2:00 12:00 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:00 l.::00 - 1:30 1:30 - 2:00 12:00 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 1:30 - 2:00 10:30-11:00 11:00 - 11:30 11 :.30 - 12:D0 L::.3.J - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 1 :30 - 2:00 10:30 - 11:00 11:00-11:30 11:30 - 12:00 12:00 - 12:30 12:30 - 1:00 1:00 - 1:30 1:30 - 2:00 ThonrnsNargas Thurman/Newton Kilgo1e/Grissom Burks/Webb Reeves/McConnaughhay Smith/Young Wright/Thomas O'Dell/Dombroski Cooley/Joshua Reeves/lYicConn:1 ugh h::y Turner/Wrigln ..... ~ ~ . J1.J .. . \\..\n1 ,, :\n.Ju .--\\. \\V\nJli:1ms,\"\\V:1ido!: KilgoreiGrissom Binglwm Woody/S. Williams Thurman/Newton Smith/Young Cooley/Joshua ThomasNargas A. Williams/Waldorf O'Dell/Dombroski 9-14-01 See .Jann Pham if there is a conflict with the Rec Center time scheduled for your class. Reminder: This is an organized P.E. time. Please be sure that when two classes are - scheduled that both teachers are present. - MEDIA CEN-iR SCHEDULE 2001 - 2002 - TJMB ____ _MON._ 'lUES. WED. \"1 IIURS. FRI. 7:35-7:55 l'REB FLOW !'REH Pl.OW 1'1\\Flil'J,OW l'P HE FLOW !'REI! !'LOW 8:00-8:40 .. WOODY TIIURMAN ll' \u0026gt;MDROSKI ## 8:45-9:25 .. S. WILLIAMS Y\u0026lt;HJNc\n## 9:30-L0:l0 VARGAS MCCUNNAUGIIII A Y c\n1\\ISSOM Y ILGORE ## 10.LH0:55 NEWTON WJ\\LDORI' A. WJI.I.IA~ts n llELL ## ll:00-ll:40 LUNCH REEVES 1.UNCI\\ t.\u0026lt;\u0026lt;NCH LUNCH ll:45-li:25 THOMAS LUNCH nlMGIJAM 5111TH ## 12:30-l:l0 WRIGHT BURKS U\u0026gt;OLFY MONITOR MEETING l:l 5-1 :55 JOSHUA WEDO '1111\\NER ## OTHER MEDIA DUTIES #t/COMPUTllR Oil RESEARCH SIGN-UP TIMES OFFICE PHONE: (501) 771-8180 ., JVmdt ~ 8~ fJJchcd ~================================================'= I 4901 NORTH ALLEN STAFFL ISTING- 2001-2002 JENNIFEBRE RANEK JUDYB INGHAM SCIPIO BROWN AMYB URKS LINDAC HANCELLOR KARI COOLEY BARBARCAU LPEPPER TERRI DOMBROSKI MARLYO UF ERGUSON MARTHFAE/ JELL CATRENFAIE G KIM GRISSOM CARMHAE SS CONNIHEU TCHINSON LIZ JORGENSON LESLIEJ OSHUA DANYIAKLIL GORE DEEDRLAE E TRACMY CCONNAUGHHAY ELIZABETMHC NULLY MARGARMEOTN K JENNIFENR EWTON CONNI0E1 DELL JANNP HARO KIM REEVES DORISS ETTLES PATTYSH OEMAKER STACYSM ITH DANSAN OWDEN VICKI STEADMAN LISA TERRY CARLINTEH OMAS RACHETLH URMAN MARIATO UCHSTONE LULAT URNER MARIBEVLA RGAS ERIC WALDORF MARWY ALKER CORRIWE EBB MARTHWAIL LARD AMYW ILLIAMS SHEILAW ILLIAMS CELESTWI OODS PILARW OODY PAIGEW RIGHT CASEY OUNG NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72118 LITERACCYO ACH FIFTH GRADE CAMPUSSU PERVISOR FIRST GRADE COUNSELOR FIRST GRADE READINRGE COVERY FOURTGHR ADE G/T NURSE MATSHP ECIALIST THIRDG RADE SECRETARY COMPUTLEARB M GR. READINRGE COVERY FIRST GRADE THIRDG RADE RESOURCE THIRDG RADE TUTOR MEDIASP ECIALIST FOURTGHR ADE FOURTGHR ADE ASSISTANPTR INCIPAL THIRDG RADE INTERVENTION SPEECH FIFTH GRADE PRINCIPAL RESOURCE SECRETARY KINDERGARTEN FOURTGHR ADE ESL KINDERGARTEN KINDERGARTEN SECONGDR ADE COUNSELOR FIRST GRADE TITLE I SECONGDR ADE SECONGDR ADE TITLE I SECONGDR ADE KINDERGARTEN FIFTH GRADE ROOM#2 9 ROOM#2 8 OFFICE ROOM#9 ROOM#4 ROOM#1 1 ROOM#3 1 ROOM#2 2 ROOM#1 8 OFFICE ROOM#2 9 ROOM#3 3 OFFICE ROOM#1 2 ROOM#3 1 ROOM#1 0 ROOM#2 4 ROOM#2 7 ROOM#3 2 ROOM#2 4 MEDIAC ENTER ROOM#3 0 ROOM#2 1 OFFICE ROOM#2 5 ROOM#2 ROOM#3 ROOM#1 9 OFFICE ROOM#1 OFFICE ROOM#1 6 ROOM#2 3 ROOM#2 9 ROOM#1 5 ROOM#1 7 ROOM#7 ROOM#4 ROOM#8 STAGE ROOM#6 ROOM#5 STAGE ROOM#2 6 ROOM#1 4 ROOM#2 0 .. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2001-2002 SCHOOL PROFILE School: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Grade: K-5 Principal: CAROL A THORNTON Race/Gender: B/F Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Assistant Principal: Race/Gender: Secretary: SANDRA WOOD Race/Gender: W/F SCHOOL PROFILE Table of Contents * Staff Staff Changes * Staff Attendance (Certified) * Staff Attendance (Classified) * School Enrollment Elementary Secondary Special Programs Special Education Four Year Comparison * Class Enrollment (Elementary) * Course Enrollment (Secondary) Extended Educational Programs School/District lntitiated Honors and Awards Committee/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities Tryout Information * Student Attendance (After Nine Weeks) Students Retained Subject Area Courses Failed (Secondary) Graduation Information Dropout Statistics (Previous Semester) Achievement/Assessment Data Staff Development Update (Certified) Staff Development Update (Classified) * Discipline Information (After Nine Weeks) Comprehensive Outcome Evaluation (COE) Survey Results Annual School Improvement Plan *INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED BY COMPUTER SERVICES Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SCHOOL: STAFF 2001-2002 FULL Tl ME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS 1 1 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 12 1 1 14 SPEC EDUC TEACHERS 3 3 MEDIA SPECIALISTS 1 1 GIT FACILITATORS 1 1 SPEECH THERAPIST 2 2 COUNSELORS 1 1 READING RECOVERY 1 1 H.O.T.S. !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES 2 3 5 CLERICAL STAFF 1 1 SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS 1 1 2 CAFETERIA WORKERS 1 1 2 COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES 3 2 5 CROSSING GUARDS 1 1 INTERVENTION AIDE PARENT COORDINATOR !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 1 Ref: DES00l Staff -43 Park Hill Elementary Page 1 Date: 10/15/01 Based on Base Location -Time: 15:40:09 ---WHITE--- ---BLACK--- ---OTHER--- POSITION Male Female Male Female Male Female Administrators 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Regular Classroom Teachers 0 11 0 1 0 1 13 Special Education Teachers 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Media Specialists 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Counselors 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Teacher Aides 0 2 0 3 0 0 5 Clerical Staff 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Custodians 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 Cafeteria Workers 0 3 0 1 0 0 4 Lunch Aides/Crossing Guards 0 2 1 4 0 0 7 Totals 0 23 2 12 0 1 38 SCHOOL: STAFF 2001-2002 (CHANGES AFTER OCTOBER) FULL TIME PART TIME POSITION WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER M F M F M F TOTAL M F M F M F TOTAL ADMINISTRATORS CLASSROOM TEACHERS SPEC EDUC TEACHERS MEDIA SPECIALISTS GIT FACILITATORS SPEECH THERAPIST COUNSELORS !TOTAL CERTIFIED TEACHER AIDES CLERICAL STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS CUSTODIANS CAFETERIA WORKERS COMPENSATORY AIDES LUNCH AIDES CROSSING GUARDS !TOTAL CLASSIFIED Page 2 CERTIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 3 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Certified Staff Absences PAGE Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male 3 15 l by Race and Sex School 43 PARK HILL ELEM K-6 14.5 7.5 l.0 7-8 9-10 3 11-12 Other CLASSIFIED STAFF ABSENCES (ATTACH A COPY OF COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 4 Ref: ABS0l0 Date: 10/15/01 Time: 15:41:45 Classified Staff Absences PAGE Race / Gender Tot-Emp Black - Female Black - Male White - Female White - Male Other - Female Other - Male 9 2 8 by Race and Sex School 43 PARK HILL ELEM K-6 28.5 1.0 36.5 7-8 9-10 4 11-12 Other SCHOOL: ELEMENTARY 2001-12 SCHOOLE NROLLMENT GRADE TT WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL LEVEL ):): M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # 0 0 0 0 PRE- K % # 18 8 26 8 12 20 0 46 KINDERGARTEN % 39% 17% 57% 17% 26% 43% # 5 4 9 10 11 21 1 1 31 FIRST % 16% 13% 29% 32% 35% 68% 3% 3% # 7 8 15 8 12 20 1 1 36 SECOND % 19% 22% 42% 22% 33% 56% 3% 3% # 9 7 16 9 10 19 2 2 37 THIRD % 24% 19% 43% 24% 27% 51% 5% 5% # 12 9 21 19 11 30 1 2 3 54 FOURTH % 22% 17% 39% 35% 20% 56% 2% 4% 6% # 8 11 19 8 10 18 1 1 38 FIFTH % 21% 29% 50% 21% 26% 47% 3% 3% TOTAL # 59 47 106 62 66 128 4 4 8 242 GRADES1 -5 % 24% 19% 44% 26% 27% 53% 2% 2% 3% Page 5 \u0026lt; e .P: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 1 )ate: 10/15/01 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL iime: 15: 54: 54 Teacher -l,ih i te- -Black- -Other- :each er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot m4ts 1 AR101 5 ART F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 AR101 6 ART F w 3 2 5 6 16 1ELVIN 1 AR101 18 ART F w 1 2 1 4 AR101 ART 6 4 9 12 31 ,MITH 1 AR201 7 ART F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 :OLCLASURE 1 AR201 8 ART F w 4 3 7 4 18 iELVIN 1 AR201 18 ART F w i 1 AR20i ART 8 8 ii 10 i 38 :.EEDY 1 AR301 9 ART F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 3ULLIVAN 1 AR301 10 ART F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 AR301 ART 8 10 8 8 2 36 1EPPER 1 AR401 13 ART F l.J 4 4 7 8 1 24\nILL I AM 1 AR401 14 ART F w 1 4 5 ~RAMBLE-IVORY i AR401 15 ART F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 AR401 ART 12 10 18 12 1 i 54 HLLIAM 1 AR501 14 ART F w 1 3 4 : OK 1 AR501 19 ART F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 AR501 20 ART F w 4 6 2 5 17 AR501 ART 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 /I-AM 1 ELM 14 BA SELF CONT F l,I 2 -, I 9 1ELVIN 1 ELM 18 BA SELF CONT F w 5 2 1 8 ELM BA SELF CONT 7 9 1 17 DEPT TOTALS 7 9 1 17 l RRAS 1 EN101 5 ENGLISH F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 EN101 6 ENGLISH F w 3 2 5 6 16 1ELVIN 1 EN101 18 ENGLISH F l.J i 2 i 4 EN101 ENGLISH 6 4 9 12 31 ,MITH 1 EN201 7 ENGLISH F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 : LC LASURE 1 EN201 8 ENGLISH F w 3 3 7 4 17 1ELVIN 1 EN201 18 ENGLISH F w 1 1 EN201 ENGLISH 7 8 11 10 1 37 :.EEDY 1 EN301 9 ENGLISH F w 4 6 2 5 1 18 ,ULLIVAN 1 EN301 10 ENGLISH F l.J 4 4 5 3 1 17 EN301 ENGLISH 8 10 7 8 2 35 1EPPER 1 EN401 13 ENGLISH F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 HLLIAM 1 EN401 14 ENGLISH F w 1 4 5 -RAMBLE-IVORY 1 EN401 15 ENGLISH F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 EN401 ENGLISH 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 H-AM 1 EN501 14 ENGLISH F w 1 3 4 : DK 1 EN501 19 ENGLISH F w 2 3 3 4 1 13 :ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 2 iate: 10/ 15/01 PAR~\u0026lt;. HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ime: 15:54: 54 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- e,er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot IE 1 EN501 20 ENGLISH F w 3 5 2 5 15 EN501 ENGLISH 6 8 8 9 1 32 IUGAS 1 EN701 71 ENGLISH RES F w 3 4 1 1 9 EN701 ENGLISH RES 3 4 1 1 9 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 IONES 1 m, 3 GRADE ~, F w 5 3 4 6 18 iELCH 1 GK 4 GRADE K F w 5 4 4 5 18 iORRAS 1 GK 5 GRADE K F H 2 1 1 4 GK GRADE K 12 8 8 12 40 DEPT TOTALS 12 8 8 12 40 IORRAS 1 Gl 5 GRADE 01 F H 2 2 2 5 11 \u0026gt;AVID 1 Gl 6 GRADE 01 F !,J 3 2 5 6 16 Gl GRADE 01 5 4 7 11 .,, c.., DEPT TOTALS 5 4 7 11 r\"')--J c../ 1MITH 1 G2 7 GRADE 02 F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 : LCLASURE 1 G2 8 GRADE 02 F i,J 4 3 7 4 18 G2 GRADE 02 7 8 11 10 1 37 - DEPT TOTALS 7 8 11 10 1 37 ,EEDY 1 G3 9 GRADE 03 F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 ,ULLIVAN 1 G3 10 GRADE 03 F !,J 4 4 5 3 1 17 G3 GRADE 03 8 10 8 8 2 36 DEPT TOTALS 8 10 8 8 2 36 'EPPER 1 G4 13 GRADE 04 F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 rRAMBLE-IVORY 1 G4 15 GRADE 04 F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 G4 GRADE 04 11 10 14 12 1 1 49 DEPT TOTALS 11 10 14 12 1 .1 49 : OK 1 GS 19 GRADE 05 F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 G5 20 GRADE 05 F w 4 6 2 5 17 G5 GRADE 05 7 12 5 10 1 35 ~ DEPT TOTALS 7 12 5 10 1 35 ~ iORRAS 1 HL101 5 HEALTH F H c..., 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 HL101 6 HEALTH F w 3 2 5 6 16 1ELVIN 1 HL101 18 HEALTH F w 1 2 1 4 HL101 HEALTH 6 4 9 12 31\n~,~ASURE 1 HL201 7 HEALTH F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 1 HL201 8 HEALTH F !,J 4 3 7 4 18 1ELVIN 1 HL201 18 HEALTH F !,J 1 1 HL201 HEALTH 8 8 11 10 1 38 lef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 3 iate: 10/15/01 PARl, HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \"ime: 15: 54:54 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- e-er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot .E y 1 HL301 9 HEALTH F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 1ULLIVAN 1 HL301 10 HEALTH F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 HL301 HEALTH 8 10 8 8 2 36 'EPPER 1 HL401 13 HEALTH F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 :ILL I AM 1 HL401 14 HEALTH F w 1 4 5 \"RAMBLE-IVORY 1 HL401 15 HEALTH F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 HL401 HEALTH 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 :ILL I AM 1 HL501 14 HEALTH F w 1 3 4 DOK 1 HL501 19 HEALTH F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 ,EAL 1 HL501 20 HEALTH F w 4 6 2 5 17 HL501 HEALTH 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 IORRAS 1 HN101 5 HANDWRITING F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 HN101 6 HANDWRITING F w 3 ..., c.. 5 6 16 !ELVIN 1 HN101 18 HANDWRITING F w 1 2 1 4 HN101 HANDWRITING 6 4 9 12 31 iMITH 1 HN201 7 HANDWRITING F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 : LC LASURE 1 HN201 8 HANDWRITING F w 4 3 7 4 18 !ELVIN 1 HN201 18 HANDWRITING F w 1 1 - HN201 HANDWRITING 8 8 11 10 1 38\nEEDY 1 HN301 9 HANDWRITING F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 iULLIVAN 1 HN301 10 HANDWRITING F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 HN301 HANDWRITING 8 10 8 8 ..., c.. 36 \u0026gt;EPPER 1 HN401 13 HANDWRITING F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 i!LLIAM 1 HN401 14 HANDWRITING F w 1 4 5 \"RAMBLE-IVORY 1 HN401 15 HANDWRITING F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 HN401 HANDWRITING 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 iILLIAM 1 HN501 14 HANDWRITING F w 1 3 4\n OK 1 HN501 19 HANDWRITING F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 HN501 20 HANDWRITING F w 4 6 2 5 17 HN501 HANDWRITING 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 iORRAS 1 MA101 5 MATH F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 MA101 6 MATH F w 3 2 5 5 15 1ELVIN 1 MA101 18 MATH F w 1 2 1 4 MA101 MATH 6 4 9 11 30 )MITH 1 MA201 7 MATH F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 : LC LASURE 1 MA201 8 MATH F w 4 3 7 4 18 1ELVIN 1 MA201 18 MATH F w 1 1 - MA201 MATH 8 8 11 10 1 38 (EEDY 1 MA301 9 MATH F w 4 6 ..., ,:.. 5 1 18 tef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 4 )ate: 10/15/01 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \"ime: 15:54: 55 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- eier Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot\nu IVAN 1 MA301 10 MATH F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 MA301 MATH 8 10 7 8 2 35 1EPPER 1 MA401 13 MATH F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 i!LLIAM 1 MA401 14 MATH F w 1 4 5 \"RAMBLE-IVORY 1 MA401 15 MATH F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 t1A401 MATH 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 iILLIAM 1 MA501 14 MATH F w 1 3 4 : K 1 MA501 19 MATH F 1,J 2 4 3 4 1 14 )EAL 1 MA501 20 MATH F w 3 6 2 5 16 MA501 MATH 6 10 8 9 1 34 )UGAS 1 MA701 71 MATH RES F w 2 2 1 2 7 MA701 MATH RES 2 2 1 2 7 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 iORRAS 1 MU101 5 MUSIC F H ..., 2 2 5 11 C. iAVID 1 MU101 6 MUSIC F w 3 2 5 6 16 1ELVIN 1 MU101 18 MUSIC F w 1 2 1 4 MU101 MUSIC 6 4 9 12 31 3MITH 1 MU201 7 MUSIC F w 3 5 4 6 .1 . 19 :.ASURE 1 MU201 8 MUSIC F w 4 3 7 4 18 1 N 1 MU201 18 MUSIC F w 1 1 MU201 MUSIC 8 8 11 10 1 . 38 (EEDY 1 MU301 9 MUSIC F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 3ULLIVAN 1 MU301 10 MUSIC F 1,J 4 4 5 3 1 17 MU301 MUSIC 8 10 8 8 2 36 'EPPER 1 MU401 13 MUSIC F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 i!LLIAM 1 MU401 14 MUSIC F w 1 4 5 rRAMBLE-IVORY 1 MU401 15 MUSIC F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 MU401 MUSIC 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 iILLIAM 1 MU501 14 MUSIC F w 1 3 4 : OK 1 MU501 19 MUSIC F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 MU501 20 MUSIC F w 4 6 2 5 17 MU501 MUSIC 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 i RRAS 1 PE101 5 PHYS ED F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 PE101 6 PHYS ED F w 3 2 5 6 16 1ELVIN 1 PE101 18 PHYS ED F w 1 2 1 4 PE101 PHYS ED 6 4 9 12 31 3MITH 1 PE201 7 PHYS ED F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 :.ASURE 1 PE201 8 PHYS ED F w 4 3 7 4 18 1 IN 1 PE201 18 PHYS ED F w 1 1 PE201 PHYS ED 8 8 11 10 1 38 ?ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 5 )ate: lOil 5/01 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL \"ime: 15:54:55 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other- e-er Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot\nE y 1 PE301 9 PHYS ED F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 1ULLIVAN 1 PE301 10 PHYS ED F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 PE301 PHYS ED 8 10 8 8 2 36 \u0026gt;EPPER 1 PE401 13 PHYS ED F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 iILLIAM 1 PE401 14 PHYS ED F w 1 4 5 \"RAMBLE-IVORY 1 PE401 15 PHYS ED F B 7 6 7 4 l 25 PE401 PHYS ED 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 /ILLIAM 1 PE501 14 PHYS ED F w 1 3 4 :OK 1 PE501 19 PHYS ED F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 PE501 20 PHYS ED F w 4 6 2 5 17 PE501 PHYS ED 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 iDRRAS 1 RE101 5 READING F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 RE101 6 READING F w 3 2 5 5 15 1ELVIN 1 RE101 18 READING F w 1 2 1 4 RE101 READING 6 4 9 11 30 iMITH 1 RE201 7 READING F w 4 5 5 6 1 21 : LC LASURE 1 RE201 8 READING F w 4 3 6 4 17 1ELVIN 1 RE201 18 READING F w 1 1 - RE201 READING 9 8 11 10 1 39 \\EEDY 1 RE301 9 READING F w 3 6 1 5 1 16 iULLIVAN 1 RE301 10 READING F w 3 4 5 3 1 t ,.(:} RE301 READING 6 10 6 8 2 32 'EPPER 1 RE401 13 READING F w 4 4 -,, 8 1 24 nLLIAM 1 RE401 14 READING F w 1 4 5 \"RAMBLE-IVORY 1 RE401 15 READING F B 7 5 7 4 1 24 RE401 READING 12 9 18 12 1 1 53 HLLIAM 1 RE501 14 READING F w 1 3 4 :OK 1 RE501 19 READING F w 2 3 3 4 1 13 )EAL 1 RE501 20 READING F w 3 6 2 5 16 RE501 READING 6 9 8 9 1 33 )UGAS 1 RE701 71 READING RES F w 3 4 ..., 2 11 .L C. RE701 READING RES 3 4 2 2 11 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 198 \\EEDY 1 SC301 9 SCIENCE F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 iULLIVAN 1 SC301 10 SCIENCE F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 SC301 SCIENCE 8 10 8 8 2 36 \u0026gt;EPPER 1 SC401 13 SCIENCE F w 4 4 7 8 1 24 il.AM 1 SC401 14 SCIENCE F w 1 4 5 \"R LE-IVORY 1 SC401 15 SCIENCE F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 SC401 SCIENCE 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 ~ef: SCH611D CLASS ENROLLMENT Page 6 )ate: 10/15/01 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL rime: 15:54:56 Teacher -White- -Black- -Other-re, her Name CourseSec Course Title Sex Race M F M F M F Tot iI IAM 1 SC501 14 SCIENCE F w 1 3 4 )EAL 1 SC501 19 SCIENCE F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 )EAL 1 SC501 20 SCIENCE F w 4 6 2 5 17 SC501 SCIENCE 8 12 8 10 1 39 DEPT TOTALS 28 32 34 30 3 2 129 DRRAS 1 SP101 5 SPELLING F H 2 2 2 5 11 )AVID 1 SP101 6 SPELLING F w 3 2 5 5 15 1ELVIN 1 SP101 18 SPELLING F w 1 2 1 4 SP101 SPELLING 6 4 9 11 30 3MITH 1 SP201 7 SPELLING F w 3 5 4 6 1 19 : LC LASURE 1 SP201 8 SPELLING F w 4 3 7 4 18 1ELVIN 1 SP201 18 SPELLING F l,l 1 1 SP201 SPELLING 8 8 11 10 1 38 ~EEDY 1 SP301 9 SPELLING F w 4 6 2 5 1 18 3ULLIVAN 1 SP301 10 SPELLING F l,l 4 4 5 3 1 17 SP301 SPELLING 8 10 7 B 2 35 \u0026gt;EPPER 1 SP401 13 SPELLING F l,J 4 4 7 8 1 24 HLLIAM 1 SP401 14 SPELLING F w 1 4 5 rRAMBLE-IVORY 1 SP401 15 SPELLING F B 7 5 7 4 1 24 - SP401 SPELLING 12 9 18 12 1 1 53 HLLIAM 1 SP501 14 SPELLING F w 1 3 4 : OK 1 SP501 19 SPELLING F w 2 3 3 4 1 13 )EAL 1 SP501 20 SPELLING F w 3 6 2 5 16 SP501 SPELLING 6 9 8 9 1 33 )UGAS 1 SP701 71 SPELLING RES F w 2 4 1 2 9 SF701 SPELLING RES 2 4 1 2 9 DEPT TOTALS 42 44 54 52 3 3 i98 C.EEDY 1 SS301 9 soc STUDIES F w 4 6 3 5 1 19 5ULLIVAN 1 SS301 10 soc STUDIES F w 4 4 5 3 1 17 SS301 soc STUDIES 8 10 8 8 2 36 \u0026gt;EPPER 1 SS401 13 soc STUDIES F w 4 4 7 B 1 24 iILLIAM 1 SS401 14 soc STUDIES F w 1 4 5 rRAMBLE-IVORY 1 SS401 15 soc STUDIES F B 7 6 7 4 1 25 88401 soc STUDIES 12 10 18 12 1 1 54 iILLIAM 1 SS501 14 soc STUDIES F w 1 3 4 : OK 1 88501 19 soc STUDIES F w 3 6 3 5 1 18 :OK 1 SS501 20 soc STUDIES F w 4 6 2 5 17 SS501 soc STUDIES 8 12 8 10 1 39 - DEPT TOTALS 28 32 34 30 3 2 129 SCHOOL TOTALS 491 512 616 592 36 34 2281 PUPIELH RuLLlBiEYHS CTH iluL W1 1\\60-02-064 Ut:IUllt.K 1, :lUUl CURRESNCHT OAOSLS IGHNEHTS ITV: PULASKI DISTRICNTO: RTLHIT TLREO CKSC HOOPAL:R HKI LLE LEnENTARY GRAOSPEA ifi:\u0026lt; -05 !!HITE BLACK HISPA!IICA Silil!/PAI NI! IO/AL!!SA T GRADTOE TAL Ii F 11 F t! r t! r ti F I\u0026lt; 43 15 8 8 12 0 0 ii 0 0 ii 01 31 6 4 9 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 38 8 8 11 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 03 36 8 10 8 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 04 55 13 10 18 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 05 37 7 11 8 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 SCHOO2'L10 57 51 62 64 3 3 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 45.0X S2.5X 2.5Z .OX .OX EXCLU19D7E 42 43 54 52 3 3 0 0 0 0 GRlD\u0026lt;/j 43.i X 53.8X 3.0X .OX .OX SCHOOL: SECONDARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 2001-2002 G RADE WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL 0 TH ER TOTAL L E V E L M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # SIX % # SEVEN % # EIGHT % TOTAL # ENROLLMENT % G RADE WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL 0 T H E R TOTAL L E V E L M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # NINE % # TEN % # ELEVEN % # TWELVE % TOTAL # ENROLLMENT % Page 6 TOTAL ENROLLMENT IN SPECIAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL -\"'\"'\"\" PROGRAMS M F WHITE M F BLACK M F OTHER TOTAL # 7 11 18 5 10 15 1 1 34 CHAMPS % 21% 32% 53% 15% 29% 44% 3% 3% # 11 8 19 15 11 26 1 2 3 48 K-KIDS CLUB % 23% 17% 40% 31% 23% 54% 2% 4% 6% # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 7 SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL: PLACEMENT WHITE TOTAL BLACK M F WHITE M F RESOURCE ROOM # 2 PLACEMENT M.R. % 100% RESOURCE ROOM # 3 3 6 1 1 PLACEMENT L.D. % 33% 33% 67% 11% 11% # 5 5 1 1 SELF-CONTAINED % 63% 63% 13% 13% # 3 2 5 7 6 SPEECH % 17% 11% 28% 39% 33% TRANSITION - BA - # 2 2 7 SELF-CONTAINED % 22% 22% 78% # RESOURSE ROOM/MH % # 2 2 1 1 RESOURSE ROOM/OHi % 50% 50% 25% 25% # RESOURSE ROOM 504 % # RESOURSE ROOM SEO % # 1 I Jli.sua1'Yl1\"Y.Yi1 fYliYPt1 % PLACEMNT IS ~ETERMINED BY PRIMARY HANDICAPPING CONDITION There is a District Self-Contained Unit on this campus TOTAL BLACK 2 100% 2 22% 2 25% 13 72% 7 78% 2 50% OTHER M 1 11% 1 13% Yes No (Circle one) F 2001-2002 TOTAL llilll[! OTHER TOTAL 2 ,,,rm 1 9 11% ,. 1 8 13% 18 '\" Iii! 11 .,. 9 '\"' 4 I 'f ,2 I lill II! Page 8 SCHOOL: FOUR YEAR ENROLLMENT COMPARISON OCTOBER 1 DAT A (USED TO DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE ENROLLMENT RANGES) STUDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS BLACK AND NON-BLACK INCLUDING KINDERGARTEN EXCLUDING KINDERGARTEN BLACK 135 BLACK 114 WHITE 87 WHITE 78 2000-2001 OTHER 9 2000-2001 OTHER 8 TOTAL 231 TOTAL 200 % BLACK 58.44% % BLACK 57.00% BLACK 157 BLACK 131 WHITE 108 WHITE 95 1999-2000 OTHER 12 1999-2000 OTHER 12 TOTAL 277 TOTAL 238 % BLACK 56.68% % BLACK 55.04% BLACK 138 BLACK 120 WHITE 121 WHITE 103 1998-1999 OTHER 10 1998-1999 OTHER 7 TOTAL 269 TOTAL 230 % BLACK 51.30% % BLACK 52.17% BLACK 121 BLACK 105 WHITE 11, WHITE 96 1997-1998 OTHER : 1997-1998 OTHER 4 TOTAL 245 TOTAL 205 % BLACK 49.393/c % BLACK 51.22% 2001-2002 Page 9 SCHOOL: CLASS ENROLLMENT (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) ~ CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M F M F M F ill SANDY JONES K 3 F w 5 3 4 6 k\n'\n//\\\n:' n,:rr /:\n: ::\n\\i\\ )@ ,: /'\n:\n:\n._\\ DEANNA WELCH K 4 F w 5 4 4 5 JENNIFER DAVID 1 6 F w 2 2 8 5 lff,,i/. t\u0026gt; ,., : ,\n/'''''' + '\u0026lt;:' ,,,, PAIGE HORRAS K-1 5 F H I~ ~ ~ F ~ AMANDA COLCLASURE 2 8 w 4 3 7 4 ,?Hf?,,,\n'/)// '''\u0026lt;,\u0026gt;? ,,\n,\n,,,,,\n,,,,,.\n:: ,,.,,,,.,,.,.,,.,.,,. SAMMYE SMITH 2 7 F w 2 5 5 6 .,..,. .. , ...,..., .,.. . ~ BRANDI KEEDY 3 9 F w 5 4 3 6 )\\/\n,,,/' \\\n'HY ,,,\"'\\} \u0026lt;\u0026gt; :::.' ::-:,::,,.: :::,::: -,\n::r:ntn AMY SULLIVAN 3 10 F w 4 3 6 4 1 KAYCE PEPPER 4 13 F w 4 4 7 +:::'t:::\n'\nii/\nY i:\"t ,:.:,., ,.,,, :,_.,.,.,.,.,.,. '\\,8,\n=\n:\n,\n:\n,\n:\n:\nLORENE TRAMBLE 4 15 F B 7 5 8 3 2 m KRISTIN COOK 5 19 F w 3 5 3 5\n,,,,\n::::,} .. ,.,., ,.,.,. ,.,.,.,.,.,.',\".', ._,., ,:, ,.,, TOTAL: 41 38 55 52 4 0 Page 10 SCHOOL: CLASS ENROLLMENT 2001-2002 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ONLY) CLASS ENROLLMENT TEACHER'S TEACHER WHITE BLACK OTHER NAME GRADE ROOM GENDER RACE M~M F M F ~ ~ DIANNA DEAL 5 20 F w 4 6 2 5 SUZANNE GILLIAM 14 F w 2 7 \"\" BRENDA MELVIN K-2 18 F w 5 1 1 1 '\"\"'''\"''''''''' /:\\,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\n,,1,, ,,\n,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:: \"\" ,.,.,.,.,,. ,.,,,,,,,\n,\n,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,\n/HIHn!HI '\"\" TOTAL: 11 6 10 6 1 0 Page 10a SCHOOL: COURSE OFFERINGS AND LEVELS (SECONDARY SCHOOLS ONLY) s T u D E N T s WHITE TL BLACK TL OTHER TL WHITE Grade Course M F M F M F M F # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: % Please use the following indicators: 1. Adv. Placement: 2. Honors/Gifted\n3. Regular\n4. Spec. Educ. Resource Example: English 10/2 = English, tenth grade/honors/gifted 2001-2002 Duplicate as needed T E A C H E R s TL BLACK TL OTHER TL M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 11 EXTENDED EDUC.AL PROGRAMS h/:1 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROGRAM HUI MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL GOVERNOR'S # SCHOOL % # BOY'S STATE % # GIRL'S STATE % ,,,,, # 1 1 3 2 5 6 SUMMER SCHOOL % 17% 17% 50% 33% 83% '\" \" ,, 1 PRE- # KINDERGARTEN % # KINDERGARTEN % \"\"\" # FIRST % # SECOND % # THIRD % '\"\"\" # FOURTH % I # FIFTH % # SIXTH % GRADES SEVEN # AND EIGHT % GRADES NINE # THRU TWELVE % QUEST # 1 1 2 1 1 3 SUMMER SCHOOL % 33% 33% 67% 33% 33% 1 Page 12 SUMMER QUEST 2001 School Last Name First Name Race Gender Grade No Shows Scholarshio Park Hill Burge Courtnie w F 5 xx No Conley Kavsha B F Ka Yes MCCray Lauren w F 3 Reduced McDonald Lawanna B F 2 XX Yes Norwood Michael w M 3 No ATTENDED NO SHOW WM 1 BM 0 WM 0 BM 1 WF 1 BF 1 WF 1 BF 0 TOTAL 3 TOTAL 2 SCHLORSHIPS 2 SCHLORSHIPS 1 REDUCED 1 School #Students #Scholarships #No Shows #Scholarships Amboy 7 2 5 2 Belwood 11 8 3 2 Boone Park 5 4 3 1 Crestwood 18 2 3 0 Glenview 2 0 4 2 Indian Hills 27 4 1 0 Lakewood 6 0 3 2 Lynch Drive 6 6 5 3 Meadow Park 0 0 1 1 North Heights 9 4 1 0 Park Hill 3 2 1 Reduced 2 1 Pike View 17 6 0 0 Seventh St. 3 1 4 0 Lakewood M. 2 0 0 0 Poplar St. M. 13 3 0 0 LC. 5 0 0 0 Carver 4 0 0 0 St. Joseph 1 0 0 0 Totals 139 42 35 14 HONORS A~AWARDS List all honors and awards - - - - - be s~ific HONORS ~ ' WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL 22 30 52 24 31 55 2 4 6 113 REGULAR HONOR ROLL % 19% 27% 46% 21% 27% 49% 2% 4% 5% # 19 21 40 28 24 52 2 2 4 96 PRINCIPAL'S HONOR ROLL % 20% 22% 42% 29% 25% 54% 2% 2% 4% # ABC HONOR ROLL % # 8 12 20 11 19 30 3 1 4 54 PERFECT ATTENDANCE % 0.15 22% 37% 20% 35% 56% 6% 2% 7% # ALL A'S ON SPELLING TEST % # 100% ON UNIT ENGLISH EX. % # 1ST GRADE HELPERS % # 23 34 57 28 30 58 3 4 7 122 GREAT BEHAVIOR % 19% 28% 47% 23% 25% 48% 2% 3% 6% # 7 4 11 6 5 11 1 1 23 MOST IMPROVED READING % 30% 17% 48% 26% 22% 48% 4% 4% # POPCORN MONITORS % # 2 2 2 2 4 FLAG MONITORS % 50% 50% 50% 50% # TOP BANANA AWARDS % # FIR MARSHALLS % # CITIZENSHIP AWARD % # SCIENCE AWARD % # 6 6 12 3 2 5 17 ENGLISH AWARD % 35% 35% 71% 18% 12% 29% # READING AWARD % I h ,.,:,,,1,1\"'''!' :ii:' Page 13 HONORS AN~WARDS I List all honors and awards - - - - - be seecific I HONORS WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL AND AWARDS MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # REGULAR HONOR ROLL % # PRINCIPAL'S HONOR ROLL % # ABC HONOR ROLL % # PERFECT ATTENDANCE % # ALL A'S ON SPELLING TEST % # 100% ON UNIT ENGLISH EX. % # 1ST GRADE HELPERS % # GREAT BEHAVIOR % # MOST IMPROVED READING % # POPCORN MONITORS % # FLAG MONITORS % # TOP BANANA AWARDS % # FIR MARSHALLS % # CITIZENSHIP AWARD % # SCIENCE AWARD % # ENGLISH AWARD % # READING AWARD % Page 13a SCHOOL: COMMITTEES/PARENT INVOLVEMENT 2001-12 I E M PLOYEES PARENTS / PATRONS HH\u0026lt; 0 F F I C E R S WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER TL WHITE BLACK OTHER :OMMITTEE . M F M F M F M F M F M F U\u0026lt;\u0026lt; M F M F M F :!UITY # COMMITTEE % ~RENT TEACHER # 20 1 6 1 50 85 25 44 2 6 240 7 1 ASSOCIATION % 8% 0% 3% 0% 21% 35% 10% 18% 1% 3% 0.88 0.13 # OLUNTEERS % # 1 1 1 1 4 E:SEG. MOIHTORHIG % 25% 25% 25% 25% # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 14 Ref: VIPSl Date: 10/11/01 Time: 8:45:14 VIPS BY SCHOOL BY RACE/GENDER - SCHOOL: 43 TOTAL SCHOOL 529 To: Principals WHITE BLACK M F M F 94 253 42 140 From: Date: Debbie Rozzel~ Volunteer Coordinator October 11, 2001 Re: VIPS numbers for Desegregation Reports OTHER M F 0 0 HOURS 1,968.50 You'll find the VIPS information for your desegregation reports above. Thank you for your patience. If you have any questions call me. SCHOOL: COMMITTEES/PARENT INVOLVEMENT 2001-2002 E M P L O Y E E S PARENTS/ PATRONS 0 F F I C E R S WHITE BLACK OTHER WHITE BLACK OTHER TL WHITE BLACK OTHER TL COMMITTEE M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F EQUITY # COMMITTEE % PARENT TEACHER # ASSOCIATION % # VOLUNTEERS % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 14a SCHOOL: EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 2001-2002 ACTIVITY MEMBERSHIP t\u0026lt;?Ht SPONSORS ~ OR WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL CLUB M F M F M F ,: ,::_. M F M F M F ,,c:-,,,,,,,,,,\"'H # FIRE MARSHALLS % # FLAG MONITORS % BOOKSTORE # 2 2 1 1 6 MONITORS % 33% 33% 17% 17% STUDENT # COUNCIL % STUDENT # COUNCIL OFFICERS % # 1 1 2 4 ANNOUNCEMENTM ONITORS % 25% 25% 50% # 1 1 2 ATTENDANCE MONITOR % 50% 50% # 1 1 2 LUNCH MONITORS % 50% 50% # % # % # % # % # % Page 15 SCHOOL: EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITES 2001-2002 OFFICERS / LEADERSHIP WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL ACTIVITY OR CLUB M F M F M F # STUDENT COUNCIL % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 15a SCHOOL: SPIRIT GROUP TRYOUTS 2001-2002 (SECONDARY SCHOOLS ONLY) WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL TOTAL JUDGES OTHER TOTAL ~CTIVITY / CLUB M F M F M F WM WF BM BF M F # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 0 % TOTAL: # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Page 16 2001-2002 STUDENT ATTENDANCE AFTER NINE-WEEKS (ATTACH COMPUTER SERVICES GENERATED DATA) Page 17 SCHOOL: STUDENTS RETAINED 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # KINDERGARTEN % # FIRST % # SECOND % # THIRD % # FOURTH % # FIFTH % # SIXTH % # SEVENTH % # EIGHT % # NINTH % # TENTH % # ELEVEN % # TWELFTH % Page 18 SCHOOL: SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 2001-2002 (SECONDARY) WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL COURSES MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % # 0 % Page 19 SCHOOL: GRADUATION INFORMATION 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL YEAR MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Page 20 SCHOOL: DROPOUT STATISTICS 2001-2002 WHITE TOTAL BLACK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL GRADE MALE FEMALE WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER TOTAL # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % # 0 0 0 0 % r Page 21 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT-ASSESSMENT DATA SAT-9 (PLEASE ATTACH MOST RECENT INFORMATION) Page 22 Arhnsu ComprehensivTee stingA, ssessment PRIMARY (GRADE 4) BEN~MARK EXAMINATION SCHOOLROSTEl9EPORT MEAN SCALE SCORES Page: 3 \u0026amp; Atcounlability Progiam PROFICIENCY CLASSIFICATION SCALE SCORE Below Basic (BEL) Basic Proficient Dtstrtct Name: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT (BAS) (PRO) LEA #: 6002 School Name: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Number: 064 Mathematics Literacy 154 and below 178 and below 155- 199 200-249 179-199 200-249 COMBINED POPULATION Mean Scale Score for School /Dt strict/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 161 171 173 177 LITERACY 175 184 190 189 GENERAL POPULATION Mean Scale Score for School/District/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 211 191 186 191 LITERACY 191 192 195 195 I EP STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School/District/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 054 090 085 086 LITERACY 139 150 152 152 LEP STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School/District/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 000 067 153 142 LITERACY 000 140 178 176 HIGHLY MOB! LE STUDENTS Mean Scale Score for School/District/Region/State SCHOOL DISTRICT REGION STATE MATHEMATICS 099 118 151 156 LITERACY 171 176 181 182 Advanced (ADV) 2 50 and above 250 and above THREE YEAR COMPARISON OF MEAN PERCENTILE RANI{ PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - GRADE 5 70 ~--------------------------------------- 60 .,_ _________________ _ 40 0 Reading Mathematics Language Science Social Basic Complete Mean PR Mean PR Mean PR Mean PR Science Battery Battery Mean PR Mean PR Mean PR [!]FALL 1998 27 24 24 29 26 26 26 l!!IF ALL 1999 47 40 46 62 43 45 46 FALL 2000 45 36 43 50 35 41 41 l!JFALL 1998 rJFALL 1999 FALL 2000 STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CERTIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 23 Park Hill Elementary Staff Development Workshops 2001-2002 School Year SAT-9/ BENCHMARK MATH WORKSHOP ACSIP WORKSHOP READING STRATEGIES ACSIP PROCESS ACSIP DATA COLLECTION WRITERS WORKSHOP- GRADES 1-2-3 ADHD LEARNING DISABILITIES READING STRATEGIES THAT WORK EPSF TRAINING SESSION MATH WORKSHOP- C.G.I. ELLA SMART START SMART STEP McRAT SCIENCE WORKSHOP WRITING WORKSHOP GRADE-5 OPEN COURT READING - SPECIAL ED. AUTISM WORKSHOP MAGIC IN THE CLASSROOM COUNSELOR'S WORKSHOP COUNSELOR'S WORKSHOP IN THE MOOD FOR WRITING THE BRAIN G. T. WORKSHOP WORD 2000/ POWER POINT LITERACY TASK CARDS READING RECOVERY SEMINAR EFFECTIVE LITERACY CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT NEW TEACHER ORIENTATION GATES GATHERING-TECHNOLOGY 8-20-01 8-20-01 8-21-01 8-21-01 9-26-01 10-1-01 6-12-01 7-27-01 8-21-01 10-1-01 6-20-22-01 7-10-11-01 7-10-11-01 8-6-9-01 8-21-01 10-1-01 8-21-01 10-1-01 8-13-01 8-10-01 10-1-01 10-1-01 10-1-01 10-1-01 10-1-01 8-21-01 8-15-01 6-26-29-01 8-6-7-01 8-17-01 6-25-28-01 STAFF DEVELOPMENT UPDATE FOR CLASSIFIED STAFF (OFFERINGS SINCE LAST SCHOOL PROFILE) Page 24 Staff Development Workshops - Classified Personnel CPR TRAINING SAT-9/BENCHMARKMATH ACSIP PROCESS ACSIP WORKSHOP DATA COLLECTION - ACSIP OPEN COURT READING AUTISM WORKSHOP TECHNOLOGY WORD 2000/ POWER POINT 8-2001 8-20-01 8-21-01 8-20-01 9-26-01 8-21-01 10-1-01 8-21--01 10-1-01 DISCIPLINE INFORMATION REFERRALS/ ACTIONS TAKEN (PLEASE ATTACH COMPUTER GENERATED INFORMATION) Page 25 Ref: DIS032S Date: 9/10/01 1iiliie: 16:06:11 ~ol: 043 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL -------------------. ------------------------------------------------------------ l 9 9 9 - 0 0 ==-----==------------------------------------------============================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ------------------------------------------------------------------==------------ 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. ll BOYS CLUB 12 E. I. C. 17 EXPULSION 0 0~ 0 0 0 g, 0 0 Og, 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 20 54.1% 10 27.0% 7 18.9% 0 0~ 0 13 9 6 0 0 Og, 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 - 0 l -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT #SW #Sru #Sru #Sru 0 0 37 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 =================\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_973","title":"Reports: Enrollment, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2001/2011"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Reports: Enrollment, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/973"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["16 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_233","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2000-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Little Rock School District","School attendance","North Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/233"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["62 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n11/20/2000 11:43 5013242079 M TOM STUDEl\u0026lt;T QUARTERLY ATI'FNDANCE REPORT FY 2000/01 LRSDF INANCIALS ERV (FOR CALCULATING \u0026gt;m, ADA. A.ND ADM OF M TO M SOI~ STIJCllm'S n: Gll.l\\.OES K-U) LEA: 6001000 COUNTY, PUUSKl DIS:rRICT, Little Rock School District QUARTER NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 DAYS DAYS DAYS PJU!SEN't n: PRESENT NON- DA.YS A.OT ADA QTR l'!VWSPORTED TRANSPORTED ABSENT 2/1 2+3/1 II0!:1-RESXDEltt s=s 1\\1.:Q.IV?\nD TO (BY M TO M 't'RANSFJ.R.) 77 91 LITTLE ROCT. 42 0 0 0.00 0.00 7702 NORTH ,-ITTLI! ROCK 42 0 5S l3 o.oo ]..28 7703 PU\"!ASKI CO SPECIAL 42 0 15677 1154 Q.Oo 36~-Be 1 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 1.58 3,1. 74 TOTAL l\\DT, Al:lA, AND ADM OF l'I TO 11 RECEIVED, 0,00 366.16 3~3.n STtlDEN'tS El,IQIJ!LE TO l!E COUNTliD AS 'nUINSl/ORTED WCL\\IOE M81D~ 8tu0El'ITS RESIO~NG TWO llO\\ln: !'!IL$ OR l'IORE FP.OM T!!ElR RESPCTIVE ASSIGNED SO!OOLS PAGE: l PAGE 01 \u0026gt;:--. p- 4 M TOM STUDENTQ UARTERLAYT TENDANCREE POR? ., FY 2000/0l I FOR CJU.CULATINAGll T, ADA, AND AOM OF M TO M SCHOOLS TODE!rrS IN ORADes K-12 J LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-R~SIOENTS TUDENTSR ECErvso TO (BY M TO M TMNSF'ER} 7701 LITTr.E ROCK 7702 NORTH tlTTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS lN QI'R 44 DISTRIC'r: N. Little Rock School 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED a 0 J DA~S PRESENT NON- '!'RANSPORTED 777 0 4 DAYS ABSENT 78 0 DistrictQUAR'J'ER NO. 1 5 ADT 2/1 o.oo o.oo 6 ADA 2+3/1 17 ,66 7 ~DH 2+3+4/1 19. 3 44 0 11837 437 o.oo 'l'OTAL A\", Al\u0026gt;A, AND ADM OP M TO M RECEIVED, ~ . 00 286 . 6 6 298 . 37 SR'El'USPDE..C,.TS IVELEAI GSSIBIGLNE ETDOS C8EH OCOOLUSN TEO AS TRANSPO!!TEIDlf CLODER SStDEHTs ,:tlDENTS !IBSIDING\" '10 ROOTM ILtS OR MORB FROM THEIR 0,00 269,00 o.oo 278.94 l CS) I.D ~ U1 U1 CS) ..... --J .--.J. .. CD CS) CS) ..... CS) ........ l.e.s.\u0026gt;.. I I ,NOV-27-M00O 0N8 :08A M Melissa M to M as follows: NI.R to PULASKI LR to PULASKI Doug ADM -- 187.9 ADM--1122.5 FAXN O. P. 01 MAGNET STUDENI'. QUl\\RTERLY /,TTENDIINCE REPORT rt 2000/01 (FOR CALCULATING ADT. ADA\n,'ND A1lM OF ~GNE?: SCHOOL STI/DENTS IN Gl!ADES K-12) LEA: 6001000 COUNTY: PUI:.:.SKl DISTRICT, Lictle Rock School District QU?.RT.:R NO. l 2 3 4 5 6 DAYS DAYS DlYS PRESENT Il'l PRESENT NON DAYS = AilA QTll T!WisPOitTED 'l'.R.Mf8P0Rt:Bt\u0026gt; ll!ISBlr.r 2/1 2+3/J. 7601 Lil'TLE I\\OCI( STIJDENTS SE!ll' TO ?601 Unt.E ROCK 11AQNT SC!IOOLS 3 65406 32633 3819 1~21. 05 2279.95 7602 NORTH LITTLE ROCK S't1JDEl'l'I'S SENT TO 7601 LlTn, ROCK ~ONtl' SC!lOOl-$ 4.3 78 20-!97 873 l.Bl 479. 50 7603 Ptll.ASKI CO SP!iClAL STUDENTS SENT TO ,isoi LI'UI.11' ltOClt MA~ 8CllOOL9 u 7' -t0i55 15U l.B ~2. 6S TOTAL MlT, ADA, AND AllH OF STUDE1'1TS ATIEl'OINli MAGNET SCHOOLS: 111.24.71 3701-10 l'\"'A\\Jt:. t:J.I. l 7 ADM 2+h-t/1 23'S. 77 98. 751 ine.ss 3846 .11 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE 'IO BE COUNTED AS Tl!ANSPORI'ED INCLUDER liSIDENT STUDENTS RESI.llUI~ TWO ROUTS NILES OR NORE FROM. l 'l!EIR RESPECTIVE A.SSI\u0026lt;3NEP SCHOOLS CF- STUDENT REGISTRATION OFFICE LITTL~ ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN ST. LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 PHONE: 324-2272 FAX: 324-2281 FAX COVER SHEET To: p~ . . Fax Number: 3 7 1.--oI O 0 From:__..,)d.._.QM._....t ,.\\. {A__ ___ _ Oam:._ . 1_ 1 _-/-\\_f_-O_O_ # Pages Including Cover Sheet . C . . LRSD SCMDGCOL I.Jt~BTYSS C'HOOL 2000/l0/02 PAGE iOOL:0 3\u0026amp; ROCKfELi..ERIN CENTIV.S EC HOOL iass Black Black Ttal White White fo tal Ot.~e!' Other fot-.1 Tc-tal Bl\n.c:k l-lhi ti? Cth\nir Min ~~ !'\\.,)I '/. Mar. !'lale F~le Black Male Feliiale White Male Female Othe\nCuu~t Perce~t ?v.-cent Percer.t !Hark Blac~ Capaci tY 22 17 3'1. 11 12 ~,, i:: .. 2 ~\" 65 60.0Y. ~ 3S.4!4 4.6~ .(lt .% BO '1 2 3 5 3 3 6 (1 12 41.? * 50.Q 5.3% 50.0 50.0 12 12 C' 3 9 5 6 2 3 18 SO.O 33.3'/. 16.7 5(:,0Y, 50.0'/. 18 '3 8 3 16 4 5 9 2 3 28 57 .1 l 32.1 10.n 50.(lt:. 50.01. 36 \u0026gt;4 l~ b i'i 6 10 16 1 2 37 51.41t 4'.3.2'/. 5.4 50.0 so.ox 36 1P (l 0 (J l 0 ,~ ..-,. 0 i .(1)\niOO.Ol: .O .or. .O 0 :l 17 p\n34 8 4 12 l 3 4 50 68.0l( * 24.0Y. e.O'/. .0'4 O\" 60 4' . ~ ):.\n. 13 20 33 9 14 23 0 l 1 57 57.9Y. 'f 40:4 1.8 .O ~oi 6(l 13 i8 16 34 9 8 lb 1 0 1 -, :i. 66,? * 3l.4Y. 2.0Y. .c~ .oi 60 !4 11 13 29 13 5 18 2 0 2 49 59.2% * '.36.7'/. 4.!Y. .O ,0',{ 60 t5 i.o 19 38 b 9 15 2 55 69. l * '2.7.31! 3.6Y. .o~ .O 1,0 ,tal 129 127 25b 'l '75 145 13 'f 22 483 bu.SY. 34.~ 5,2Y. 482 ~~~c)0 8 It 1:/ @3 l~G_d:5 t 7)\n5g 001 CENTRAL .001 l~~~~~~~ l~1\n~~ j~~NTRAL . w:~\n,,-,,---..::: 002 'HALL 002 HALL wr~\nOctober 2, 2000 Enrollment - Little Rock School District ... 1~8 o 104: 107 138 ~ ~r~ ~r 11\nr \n1~ ~\n\nr 1\n~: } ) ~ o 101 99 160' w\n1[ w\nr\n:\n w~\n~\n~: w\n~\n:\n1 172: \n: w\nw~ 0. 47: w\n: 442. ::r\n:: w\n: w\nw\no w\nw\nw :\n: 002 r~:.~ :l ~\n116: w~l w\nw~ w~r w:\ni w.:\nww\nr 09.~ :~~~~ w. ::\n:\n.. ........ w\n~f 103: w\n11 8 w~f w~r\n1\nr 2781 ~\n1 \n:r 114\\ ~~~~r 72% 3 T 3: 81 I w7..oww.2 1 4wwo . 3:: 83.. ...45N. 003 MANN M/S 6 ... .. ~~\nwl~~~~ ~\n:\n1 WW\n: W\nr W\n W\n1 w\n W~ WW~} ~:: W\nWW\n~i W \n1 WW\n~\n80i\n11 w\nr\nr ~I\nr\n:rw 452. :003 ~A~~ M'~. wr\nr :3?.l w~\n:w 53% 005 {P.I\\R.l:\u0026lt;Y.11:\n: \\'\\I 005 : PARKVIEW 005 IPARKVIEW w\n PARKVIEW 006 }BOOKER ~~~ : BOOKER t '006 BOOKER ....... .. 1~ ~~\n BOOKER w N t w\n~~\nl\nw. 11\nww~ nw\nw:\nw\nw ~r\n~ I w:\nl\nr 87.. ~1 w\nw\nl w~ w~t w~\n1 w~\nw~r 76: ~~ w\nr w~r 1 \n1 w\n1 WW\n: w ~\n:: w~\n w\nr w~r ~r w~f w\nr ----==------:r 1: 31\n23' 0 1 19: ~\n\n1\n~r-~~1r\n1 ~r 31 33: ~\nr)\n1\nr ~I\n~ 2 ol ~~ 16= 2r 1l ~r ~ .w\n:1 o w\ni ~~\n\nr- ~ w\n\nr ~1 w\n~r w\n~ 22\nr o 11 w\nr 303 007 iDUNBAR w\n91. ~\nr w\nw\n1 \n\n: ww\n007 I DUNBAR w r\nw~I :: ~\nr 72 w:: WW\nr\nt\n: :\nw\n: .007 l~:~\nWI~ \n1:.I w\n\n1 w\nr -~r\nr w:: :\n: w\n w\n:1 008 r\n:\nw~r o\n~ 118\nw:\nw\n\n:1 w\nw\n~\n008 l\n:\n w~l --~ 86 w ~~I\n\nw ~tN ~\nr\nr 215: \n~: w\n1 \nr 1r ~ w~ 12:\niw 224 w I .... ::::\n~ . ..] !.\\ .. 2.. ~ .::::~\n:r:\n:\n.r.i. .v ~\n\nr ~\n1 1, 82 981 3.. 2 o w~i 53I 35 w\n: w.\nr 1 : w\nw~: 42. \nr w\n::1 008 FAIR 008 1\n:\n. 009 i FORST HT 6 545:: 56% .... ...- .-,-.....j\n-,-,- \"\"\n3\"r :~J ,.% 2}=jjf:.O% 77 \nr 1\n! w~ 34 w :~!\n~~1~-.d 244 o. 1: ~~:\n~\n\nr 1 J ~r ) 009 :\n~~~~ :\nw l\n ~I 009 \n~RST HT l\n~ WJ \nJ6?f o : ) , 35 63 2.2.!\\ . 0 3 67 78. 0 1 0 o: 58 6i 269 \nf 1I ..\n1 77 oi \n1~ I~ \n~ :I 46\n~~: :\n~\u0026gt;! ~~~ :\nPUL HT J\n01q ]~uLHT J 1~ 318! 10\nj:56% 011 isoUTHWST l~ ~I ~I 831 83:: ~r 3 ~ Oi 6 } 011 1\n~~~::\n~o! \noi\n1 95( \n\n~~:: 71 \n011 r\n~UTHWST w r~ ~1 N ~1 n 1 73\nr \n \no. ~r 7 \n~:~r\n1 11 ~\n\nr 92% 012 .MCCLELLA : o ~r175( 16) :rN\nI\nw\n1 11} \n r 012 ::~~:~~: :\n~1 ~r ~\n:= ::i \n0 \nw~ ~:r\n . ... ...1 .1 . ... .. 4.....9.. .,,,,,., .,.=:.,:.,,. ..\n~\n1 :\n:~:r:\n ~o = 1\n~:\n\nT\nr \n\n\n\n012 i~\n:\n:~r\n:\n\n::.\n~.::i::i:\n~ :\n:~i 89 :: 4\n~:\n\n1 4 205{ 1041t .... ~9 19 91% P.1} .. H~N9..B~:~ 1~ 1: 0. w\n ::\nl w\n w~ wr 17 \nr w r 013 HENDERSN 7 ~J~ 1 \n~~~) \nr\n~r 12 1\nr 186' 1 M J ~1 11\n::i 65' :r~ ~ r~ :\nJ\n~r\nr 435} ~~\nr 28( ~~~11 77% 2 ~I ~\nr 129 ~r 11\n)\n~: ~r\n~ w r 015 'CLOVRJR ~y ~1~~~\n~I~ ~) ~: \n1~ 238' .,. w l 015 ]~:~~\n:\n0 N\n:\n: \n ~1\n1 ~ ~\n\n11.~\nl 52. 55\n~\n186% ~:\n ~~~~~~~ ~r65 97:\n1 \nr\n: \n1 \nrw\nr 198: r w 016 :~~~~~~~ ~r\n\nr\n:r\n1\n1'\n~\nr\n~ .: :::::::::::::: 5 ::::: 1 :::: 1 J,,::::::::: ,016 1::\n~~~\nww~I w\nr w\n:: ~r\n\n: w\nr w\n:: J\n:i :\n!\nJw 17 79% 017 'BALE o: 251 \n: w\nl w~l w\n~ ww: ww\n \n: 017 .BALE w~i 18' \n1\nr\n~ 8}ww\nw\nI 017 (BALE ww~I ~ \n\nr ~l ww:1 w\n w :\n1 017 I~\n::~ w w~I w\n\nr 20! ~: \nw\no: WW\n: \nr 49:. 017 .ElA.LE: ::5 \nr 18' \n: w\nw\nr\nr ~1 ww\n1 WW: ::::::::::.:..:..:..:..:.1.:.. :.:.1.\n: ::: \n :\n:~: ..~: \n o 11: oi -~- .. -\n 015 } CLOVR JR HENDERSN 338 76% 018 I~RADY ,. 1 w ~l\n~ 17 . 1 \nr ~r\nr \nr 018 r~~:~\n~ ~ ii ~\n1l 7\nr 1 ~ .~ ~1 1\n018 ~~:~~N \n 1=: 1 17. 231\n ~ ~r 0. 5 } 50 018 ~~\n~\nl:: J ~l 1 1~: ....? .P.,). ~\nr ~\nr ~l 54 018 B RADY 5 1: 0 17: 201\n~?\n) ~~( =. ...... ... .. .. . . 1..,., ..,.., . , .. = =,,.. . -. - . . . .- . . - . ,.,,--,-,,--,,:\\.--.,,-- '018 W.==.\n:\nW : w 0 WW ~f\n W~r\nW ~\n:\nW\n: ~ \u0026lt; ~-r - --...- ----.--.{-.-- --\n:,i\n--:-:'---:'.----c4----o\n...\n_._o..\n:_.... =..-!.~ WW~: W ~'f\u0026gt;W W::::~\n~+{p\n~\nr 66:: 20 W ~~~r 75% 019 .BADGETT 19 0 0 w\n. ~ :r 019 r~:\n~~\n~ w ~ WW~ w~:\n~r \nr \nr W~ 0 ~ ~:\nr ii ::~J ~3% } 020 : MCDERMOT~-\" - - o: ~\n1~~RVER\n~: \nr -~: \n.....\n~ \\ 021 icARVER r\n\nI ~r\n1 1\n~ t~ \n1r ~1 ~1~~r 021 icARVER N r~ 1. )I\n~:\n~T)\nr\no 1:\nr ~\nr 021 :~\n\n~~~ c 1 i ~r\n~ \n:\n: ~ w~r 0 ~i\n:\n. .\n.: r 90 ~~~ ~ARVER l~ ~: ~\nr~\n:~ 11~r r\no{ 20I 1\n, \n: ,\n-~~----- ,-..--------.\u0026lt;.....------- -~\n.- WW\n: WW\n022 .BASELINE \n1 3: ~\n 022 :BASELINE , r\n0} 0'\n:1\n:- ~1\n' \n' ~t 3} : '' : 022 : BASELINE \n-~ ~1\n~1\n:\n\u0026lt;..1\nr \n1 0 \n ...\n ::\n1\n.~C\n~a\n:. .a :\n1\n.~. \n1\n ~I 1: \n\nr 022 ~ASELINE .,\n.. 9. O{ 0 11\n\nO, )i \n 42' 'o\n2\n2:\n: .1_:B\nA~:S\n.E\nL~l\nN\nE\n::.::0 :. :~:: ::~.p1~6 c '\nl 2:. ~1 4\n1\n:,\n\"'38 ~ , ~ -~~- 34: 259 \n.,1:\n.:~\n.\n\n~ \\ o --~ \n} \n~! o:\n\na 7i 3 45t\n1\nAIRP .RK \n .. ~: --~ \n1\n:- ~\nw ~r N\nr \nr \n\nFAIRPRK \n.. ~rO:\n~1\n~\n-~\nr:~r\nr 023 ... :\n:\n: : a .. ~ \n:.\n \n:.\n\n ~l \n:\nr \nI 023 FAIRP RK ~ a~ \n~ ~l r ) ) ~ ........ ... .... ..t\n. . 3 16 ::\n:::::~:~f}: \nJ\nl o' :.:.:.. ... 2 024 :FORST PK 1 10 024 \n~~\n~\n \na: -~ \n-~\n-r~ - -~\nr -~:\n:,\n024 FORST PK .. G , ~l 6 \n,\n ~\n --~ \n: N ~: 024 :\n~~ST PK 4 ... ~, \nr \n~ 1~: 0 0 \n~i 14. \n 024 :FORST PK l\nQ.\nr\nr ~ ~\nr\n\nr \n024 FORST PK ~.2.1. O FORST PK 025 :FRANKLIN w\nr \n\nr ~1\n...: 31 ) 1 1 ar . . 40.' . t:~=t --.l:.....---\"\"------ .... t_~~:\nt: . \\' 2 0 71 ( 025 :FRANKLIN } :: '025 f,~J\\.t--lf\u0026lt;.Llt--1 027 ~IB~S 027 'GIBBS 027:G IBBS w\n oiw w1~2l. w:\n:~ w\nr ~rw ~110 WW~ 027 GIBBS w : ][ ~: w~w:\n~l\nI\n Q Q: ~: 6} w:w: 027i-~\n~BS 1~ 1 i ~ \nt 1~: 1 1 r\nr ~ 8 :'. :::.':::- , 1 , ...:. . .. ,{: ~=--- 028 }CHICOT 028 kHICOT ... f~. ~\nCHICOT w w\n~\n1~:\n~~\nw : 028 ~:\n~~\nw\nlwEsT HIL 029 wr:\n~\n: w\n029 w:\n:\n:\n: r\nw 029 w::\n:\n:\n~ w : 030 LEFFRSN 1 030 .JEFFRSN 1~ ~:\n 1:1 v\nr :JEF\n~SN \n~- ~141 1:r ) ,l ~ oi\n~1J 030 iJEFFRSN \"\"C ~1 2:\n~:\n~ 0 ~ ) )\n~ \n~ ~ ~ 030 iJEFFRSNW i\nw ~l w~w1\nr~ww~w\n~rwJw\n~r\\w\nw 030 c~\n~w : : w~r~ I\n:r ~w\nWW~ --~: 14 ::\n:.:::I: 031 ::\n:\n:\n\n~ 1 al oi 34 30' o w~: w\nr 031w\n:\n:\nw\n: l\nw ~r 1: 26.\n:~ Tw\nrr ai ~iww~Tww~ 0311\n:\n:\n: WW\nw~rw ~wT\nw\n:wT ~w\nr ~rw ~\niTww w~r 53% 7 ,....,.C.L..O..V..R. E.L. . .::-\n~.~~-\n,:~.- 032 ioooo 1 ~\nwr~QDD wl\nwww\n1\n1\n:1 2' 1 w~.w~ww~w\n' \nr 9.3.?r~~~~ W\nW\n1 a,\n:\n:\nW\nW~.......~ 1'\n 032 I~ODD w [ oi w\n:\n~} 9:\nw.\n.o : ~wr\nr WW: WW\n: 032 toooo 15 w\nl \nr\niw\n: :w\nw\nl ~rw ~r5 w\n:w w\nr\nWI~~~~ w :\nw\n! 15 w\nw\nr ~ WW~\nw :\n1:\n:w t:21! . :...2,. ....7:\n\n 033 fMEADCLIF 1 0 10\n~\nr\n. ~).~\n .:\nr\n~ iMEADCLIF r\n~t 0\n~r\n) \n\nr 0. ~\n1 ~\n p~~.: ~:~\n~\n~ w\n~ o 1~: 1). ) ) ~ o ~ ~r\nr 033 :~:~~:\n~ t ~w~l\n~ 1~: 11 1r} 0 ~\n 51{ 033 w1:\n:~~w:\nw:w ~wr ~\nr\n:w\n~w ~ r\nr\nww\nT WW\n w\nw :iw. 033 MEADCLIF : ww ~~w1w\nwi\nw~w WW\n: 7 034'M ITCHELL ==fJ- ... .-w-..o...- w.-l,.\n-. .-.~w-\nw1 --\nw\n w~ 1\nw-I\n.w~-\n.-, WW\nWW\nr\n: wr:\n:~:w:\nal ~w:\nw\nw:\nw\n w\nw ww~\n:lw ~ l ~\n1: :\n:~G::w o ~:w\n:\n):\n! o ..w\n r\n. 1: ww:\n: wr:\n:~w:: : 0. o 24. 0 w\n w\nw 0 . 0. w\nr [\n MITCHELL w~ w ~ ~\n1 22\n1 0\no, \n1 ww\nl 0~1 w1:\n~:~::: w Q. d\n\nw:=\nQ Q. Q: 034 JMITCHELL\n,'-''' ......:.:---'''''--,,,....-,~- 035 .ML KING -.-..-::.-,,,--,,-,,-,, .... - 035 M ~ ~.l.~G .035 ML KING 036 R OCKFELR (\n~\nw ~~ :\n~:~ :. ...,...- ,.:...... ---r--.........----.--....... 037 GEYER SP ..................................... ot--1.t' ~ /) .. ~-~--...i.~. \\ w\nl 1 89% 96% ............I. 33 5974 54% ::.:,=,V'\"-'-~'-\"' 037 =GEYER SP ~ ....:.\n1 ~r ~\n: wit\n\n: ~ ~.. ... }\n~- 037 .GEYER SP ......\n0 Q w\n. 26. ~ } 0 ......~..\\. . 2. 1 ...\n.~. r 037 ....~.\n: ....... ~1\n: 15 .....\nr\nr .\n. ... a -~ .. ~l : \n~. .... ... 037 ~~~~~ ~~ ,\n ~: oi\nx 23 ...... ~ ......\n. ........ ..\n ','.'','.'~i' ,'.'','.'\n......:\nr 037 !~\n\n: \n~: ..\n.... ..\n. ... ..~..l. 1 038 P~~~~ E ... :: ....,, 038 iPUL HT E 2 ., , .......... - . 038 P ULHTE r~ 038 .PUL HT E 1: ..... 038 .PUL HT E 5 038 ~~: :\n~ l:\n.,.-.-.'.'.', ..,-,,---,_,,,,, .. .,,._..,_,. .., : ..,..--.,.-..- -.-.. . _. _ ._._..,._....._ .,_.. _. _ ....,, ,:..:.,,----,:._.. .. ---~-'-'''-:-:\"\"'''~-- 039 RIGHTS EL 039 : RIGHTS EL 039 RIGHTSEL :--,----- 039 RIGHTSEL :---,---- .039 j RIGHTSEL 9~9 :.~.IS3.HT~~L 'o39 RIGHTSEL '040 ......\n~:\n~\n q49 }R\u0026lt;?rv.i1r:-:,1c 040 .ROMINE 040 1R(?l',lllt-llc\n\u0026lt;t() ~OMINE 041 041 21 20 0 0 0 0. 0 0 41. a: 25\n: w\n1\nQ: 0 \nr ','.':\ni ....\n.: ...\n.\n. .....\nr\no o ......~... . .....\n.....\n~:..... ...~..\n1 ....\n.: .....\nr\n -~ ~r ~ ...\n.. 1. ...:r.. .w.1...,....6',.'. ..' al .....Q..... ...... o.......... 0' .w,.'w. OW r3. . 4.. } ..\n.r. .\n..\n.. ..a 1 1... . ....\n.: ... .,..o .... .. . . ::.---.----\n- .-.--::- V .-.-..--..-.\\ ........... -.-c q: o o o. o ....\n.\n1 ....\n.\nr ~. .....\n ....\n. ..........\ni \n: -~r \n~: \n~\n2 \n.....~. \n..... :r \n: ...\n.\n. ~1 ....\n. ...\n.. at ...\n..\nr 042 r:ASHNGTN O 9 5r 042 .WASHNGTN wl\n2' ','.'\n:\n\n'1,'. '\nw\n: ','.'\n: ','.'','.'~i \n~: w\nr 042 ..... r::\n:~~l\n~ ~ 1:\nr ..\n.~.. . .\n. ....w ...\nr\n . .~.....\n.. .:.~. . :\n~A~~~~T.~ ]\n...... ~r~.I 24. 15. 3\n1 oi 0 .......\nw\n.w 71' 65% \\ 10~42 :\n1 W A:S~HNG\nT~N ~\n~ J\n.\n.:\n.: ::~\n:\n.\n.:\n::::~]-:: ~\n,..._--',._...-,- 043 WILLIAMS 043 1:\n:~\n~\n043 ::\n:~\n~\n043 .WILLIAMS 9: 1~ ~~1 \n: !.\n.:1: : :ri.~I \n.:,__ __.. .. ::=+ 1vy1g1AMS .... \n,: 1 .. S?~ ...,...... t ...-........ .............................. . ........... . ............... 24}. ~ 0 ) ~\n111\nr ~a: ~~~-~---~\nr: 14.J ~ 044 Iw1LSON 11 ~1~ r\n1 31 f 1 1 ~ ~t M~/\nr ~~ ~::\n~~~~- 2 .... ~ or\n)\n~1)~r\n~3 1r ~\n: 044 .WILSON ~ 1 i O 1\n23'. ) 1 } ~ 2 1 39 044 w1:\n~\n~~ tw ~:ww~} 1\n:w\n~: w\nlw~~ w~ww\n w:l 044 I:\n~\n~~ w l\nw . ~t ~ w\n~t 21 \n w\nr ~f\nI w~r\nr 43: .::....w.\nV 'w). O. .Kp.... \n w. I\n w~. .w. w0 0 . :.:\n1 i1 3 1 J:.,\n' 4-\n_ ,\n\n_~\n_-~- {]Sr} _0L ..\n:.w~ .,... . 3 16 r~\n57 045 :WOODRUFF 1 o w~r 1~ 1~\n0 o 0 \nr~ ~r ~r \n: 1\n~\n~\n~ \n~ 1 ~ \n~..:.. 1 .1.\n\n \n \n:~\n ~~. 045 wooDRUFF wl\n0. ~..\n~r 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3. ~r ~1l WW j 045 1:~~~r~: :\nw ~ WW~ w\n~J 16 w\nr w~ w\nw\nw s w\nr w\n:: w . J\n: IwooDRUFF r\nw~i w ~ w\n\nr w\n: w\nr w\nr\nr\n: w\ni WW\nw w\n: I 045 tvyqq[)~lJff 1:w o 17 w\nr w~ w\n w\n0 w.\nr\nl WW OODRUF .w,.2.~1.~.2.W wo1l wwow..7. 0. ww1 r w/4wt\u0026gt;. . .6J.. w 2 ... .....w ..s.. . , ?..~~(O, 9.1.~ ~\n~\n~,w r~ o w~ w\n~f 1s ~ g\n ~t 1 ~( 50 046 .MABEL EL 1\n 0. 0 25.\n1: ) 0\n .w~\n \n~1r 046 .MABEL EL ~ ~r\n: w~ ~:\n\nr ) ~~ (\nM ~l \n~r 046 .MABEL EL ~ +~ ~\n~\n~ ~l 1r ) ~\u0026lt; 1~i ~r ~~\n046 .MABEL EL \n. ~ ~r 2~\n~ ) 1 ) ~ J )\nr ~: .MABEL EL wl: w~ ~11\n.....~... ..w~ \nr\nw 3 w :\n~ ........ ......................... ww ww. .w w w 9 . 10.t~ ~~ i~~~~~~~ .. P ... q' .w4\u0026gt; s o\no: 3. 6 1a Q47 .TERRY 1 17 20 3 o 0 25 1~r 047 r\n~ ~r 5. W\nW\nW\nr\nl w\n W\n WW~ 12 W~:r ~:\nw 1\n~RRY w\n\nr ww~I \nt ...\n~ \n ~! w\nr\n~~\nr\nERRY w : \n w~r\n\n~) \nr\nw\n\n20' ~\nr 044 .WILSON 89% ~-\n-11\nj~\nj\n. ) 215 1 \nt::::\nJ 46% .\u0026gt; 048 1~~~~~1~~ :1 1 1: ~ ~\nr ~~r 1~r .~\n\n1\n::\n\n:\n\n1\nr\n:\n\n\n\nr~: 17} :\nr 62 048 F~~~~l~H 1\n\n:\n\n1\n~ \n\n,\nr~ \n,r :\nr \nr 9~ 1\n::\n\n\nL: \n:\n\n\nr- -~\n~::\nr -~\nr 048 1\n::\n: w\nw\n!. :\n1\n:\n\n\nr\nr w :t\nr :\nr\n~: w 0~ :]\n~~\n~ : W \n: 1 .1 WM\n1\n:\na:\n\n72 'O_~.. .. J'ULBRIGH o , m -18....\n.~\n.-.':-:- ~~\n:~~~~~~ 20, \n-~ ~\n: \n\nr\nr ~\ni'~\n\n~CR.. 1~\n: 1 ... .\n \n~ \n 1~l 1\n1 \n~ P~.P. O TTER c~ 3 o: 10 1~\nr\n ~r\n:\n~ 10 M :\n: 050 .OTT~~CR :. oi ~r\n1 ! \nr 1 ....\nr o ::\nJ ~~r .52 050 .OTTER CR r~ ~:~ 1~ ~.} )\n1f 16\n1r 52. 050 1~\n~\n~\nl\n\n- ~l.\n::::: 0 0 0 ]..'\n.::t:: :: 12\nr\n1:\n:::::::::::::~.~J~~i-::::,. .\n:::tc.\n:r~\n:r:\n 051 ~AKEFIEL 1 o 20\n! )' 3 o oI 1, 6 59 051 ~~~~F'.1~.~\n w\n1\n: w\n\n1\nw\nr\n. w \nr 051 :~AKEFIEL w L 0. 22! 18: w.\nw :\n\n1\n1\nr ~\n=WAKEFIEL r: \n w\n1\n \nr 2! w\nw 53! 051 lWAKEFIEL w\noi 1 f 24 22)\n\nl \n 0 ,\n:r .. o ......... .5... ...A.:..W.. 1..F.. . 1. K...E. ..E. .L\n. , ~ ~ 25. \nr\n \n, ~ o.\n \n :1: .......... ..Y)...... .P. .. ......:. J: .s ...o . .. ...: .:. ) :. , .(iL 051 cWAKEFIEL ~/.~ 1[~ .\n:~~\n: ~J\no .. .9.'. J[ ~\n:::\n~~ 1 o o 30 38 ~ ~I()L ... 2 ... ?.. 1L 71 052 :WATSON r\n -~: '~I 38 :\nr o 1 r ~r o: 0 1 r\nr g~?..::\n~~ ~ -~ \n1-~ ~\n1:-:- ~\nr o: ::\n\n: 61 052 1:\n~ ~~ : o ~r ~~}\n~:\n= 2 ~r O o'\n052 :WATSON \nof ~:: .. -~1: ~1: 1 1 ~ ~: O=\n ~:r .052 :\n~~~ 1\n~ r~ :\n~\n~ 1.=\n~r\n: ~ L J'i/ ...,::: 725 .ALT AGCY 725 I ::\n:~~\n725 725 'A=L:-T- A,G CY ................ J2.5. A~TA.\u0026lt; 3-~Y.J\nTotal Elem Total Middle Total High Total Sec Total District ALT AGCY Grand Total 97 99 4377 4356 208 232 12 11 33 38 1828 1985 64 81 5 8 46 47 2422 2367 82 73 4 5 79 85 4250 4352 146 154 9 13 176 184 8627 8708 354 386 21 24 0 0 32 50 0 0 0 0 176 184 8659 8758 354 386 21 24 81 1728 1714 739 721 68% 69% 1033 978 1051i41as 2011 1251 \nos1f6 8% 1772 1699 12s5siaso2 fa471 F~i 12559: 68% 3500 3413 j~jsjf17.jj~]i~1:j 1145 253~\nr68 % 22 28 132}82 j5o fo 132 62% 3522 3441 25525 h 1411 I 6963 (1145 25525 68 % \u0026amp;7i!3 ~#,\n,, (,~~ /~8~1 l_, (f,_:~c-~ .~. 1\n,.,c.?J-P3. + Jo ~/ ~ a?\nSf-f._,1V-f\"P, ~ 74,3-- _i,(,,3- C:te~ /a:?,8 \"Ja-, ~ :, JY~P~ Cl . f_L~l-'(~~J-~~ ~~7~ \\ --\nI l'i~~ e,913 //-,S ~)\n$73 ,\u0026lt;t F\"e// -iL PJ-P~ ..\n,. ~D ~I ? ~\u0026amp;' 17t~t ~I 9\n-y' ~I$)- ,=\n\u0026gt;5,-l\u0026amp;I v'1o W( Q)I BT IBI ILIITTILJEI B( O)CI[C IPlUifIfLi I IC C~ CC1 BI COI)L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET December 12, 2000 Memo To: Melissa Guildin, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: ,dj'Zt Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: Requested Information This memo is in response to your recent request concerning school building capacities and plans for facility improvements or construction. We are enclosing a copy of school building capacities and a memo from Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services, explaining the plans for facility improvements and construction. AN EQlJAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER [Z--~ ltL~~l From_:. .J~ez::.:.,__ __ _ Return D Keepo rT ossu JI' 1P oet-ll\"7688CC!M19 93 P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 North Little Rock School District School Building Capacities 2000-2001 Buildiag Qag\nu.i~ Buildiag ~agai:.i~ ~ Witb e~utable WiU]QUet Qttable Amboy 406 - Belwood 188 Boone Park 473 Crestvvood 318 Glenview 229 Indian Hills 426 Lakewood 254 Lynch Drive 506 Meadow Park 205 .-i,ee,~ North Heights 509 Park Hill 282 -ffl7I' Piv\"' 11\n,, 372 ( Redwood J /~ - ::,evemn :::,creet 429 Lakewood Middle 598 - Poplar Street Middle ' 814 Ridgeroad Middle 641 Rose City Middle 457 Argenta Academy 175 NLRHS-East Campus 1299 NLRHS-West Campus 1300 12/15/2000 14:54 501-324-2281 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: FROM: Mrs. Melissa Gulden Junious Babbs 1 SUBJECT: Building Capacities DATE: December 15, 2000 LR SD SRO PAGE 01/02 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 324-2272 E-Mail: jcbabbs@stuasn.lrsd,kl2.ar. us Please note attached information regarding your request for '00-01 building capacities. Sony for delay in this response. Adopted attendance zone boundary changes ('99-00) and the school transition piece, resulting in realignment / redistribution of grade levels between elementary, middle and high schools have resulted in numbers being altered. These factors include school or program modifications, renovation, portable addition / removal and/ or utilization rate that is factored. Recent approval of the May 9th Special School Millage Election has prompted additional monies in recommended repairs, renovations and additions that will result in future adjustments and revision. Exact tiroelines are now being established to project scheduled work over the ne,rt three to five years. I hope t.o keep your informed throughout the process and ask if questions come up, please feel free to give me a call. ______________________________ _. 12/15/2000 14:54 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 02/02 Little Roc:k Schoo/ Dlatrict 2000.2001 Cspac/tles 2000-2001 Cepecitles SCHOOL Caoacl~ Genta/HS 2200 Fa/rHS 1200 Hal/HS 1300 includes portables McC/ell/lHn S 1440 includes annex P~ II~ HS 1200 Sub-Total 7340 750 DunbsMr iddle 780 FClffl$Ht eightMs iddle 780 HendersOMfild dle 960 M8belvBMleid dle 600 MllMM/ddle 900 Pu/sskHi el{ll1l1M1 iddle 750 SouttMreMs1ld dle 750 FllirPri 304 ForwPtlrli 400 F1anidin 532 Fu/bright 491 Geyer~ngs 358 Gibb$ 321 Jefferson 471 King 715 McDennott 453 MHdowc:liff 358 Mltch6/I 283 Otter Cr8ek 415 PulaskHi e/a/71s 350 Riams911 296 Rockefeller 481 P1 - 5th Grade t-::Rc--om-lne:-------+--.a=t3 :[:\n:\n:,.-.-,ce-/:d---_------++--_--=\n--19~\n:,\n~tJ:: e:\"\n~les Washington 678 WesternH ills 320 WilliBms 4.90 WIISOII 340 Wooctuff 314 12/151CO ( fiLE:D U. S. OISTrtl:\nT COURT OCT 15 1987 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . . EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS C~L[RK WESTERN DIVISION By:~ -r----------,,_..,..:..,.., \"\"\"'r:'\",\"1= - ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al DEFENDANTS ORDER Pursuant to the oral order issued from the bench on October 9, 1987, it is hereby adjudged that Aubrey Mccutcheon serve as master in this case in order to insure compliance with the mandate of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The conditions requiring this appointment are set out below. The filling of magnet school seats continues to be unsettled. I have previously approved making the racial ratio for the magnets more flexible, that is, permitting a black percentage of 50-55% rather than exactly 50%. The Little Rock School District (LRSD), in accordance with recorrrnendations of the Citizens' Comnittee, will use magnet vacancies to improve racial balance in the nine schools which are outside the balance guidelines set by the Court of Appeals. The LRSD has asked that these transfers to magnets be effective November 9, 1987. I have no objection to the November 9 date. I would ask that the master be imnediately apprised of the effect of the student transfers. . . '\n,\",. .,...,.. . . ~ \\, \" --~---~-~.- _ _J ( Measures other than the use of magnet seats must be explored ( in 6rder to deal with the schools whose black student populations exceed that which is permitted under the mandate. The Citizens' Corrrnittee has reconmended that the LRSD's entire student assignment plan be refined, changed, or discarded. This appears to be the most pressing assignment for the Master. The destablizing effect of yet another \"new\" student assignment plan suggests to me that the 1988-89 student assignment plan may indeed be this school district's last bite at the apple of quality desegregated public schools. In short, the student assignment plan must be workable both in design and imp l emen tat i_on. Accordingly, I have appointed Aubrey Mccutcheon to serve as Master to assure compliance with the mandate of the Court of Appeals. Mr. Mccutcheon has played a key role in truly successful desegregation plans, that is, plans which improve schools in both quality and racial balance. I am convinced that such a plan is possible in Little Rock, Arkansas and I am confident that Aubrey McCutcheon's guidance as Master will make the difference in devising and implementing that plan. Mr. Mccutcheon has served (and currently is serving) as an attorney for school districts under federal desegregation orders. He has served as a deputy superintendent of a large metropolitan school district in the midst of a desegregation plan. He is an experienced educator and desegregation lawyer who is familiar with what works for children as opposed to what works - 2 - ' . ,,.- .. ( ( in theory only. The Master appointed herein shall be invested with the full range of powers allowable under Rule 53, Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS SO ORDERED this -7-day of October, 1987. - 3 - N0V-21-T00U E0 3:46P M FAXN O. c- SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AUGUST 18, 2000 HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL CAPACITY Jacksonville 1025 Mills 780 North Pulaski 900 Oak Grove Jr./Sr. 935 Robinson 506 Sylvan Hills 998 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SCHOOb CAPAC[[Y Fuller Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High Northwood Junior Robinson (2rooms devided)'( Alpha Academy ~ Sylvan Hills ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL CAPACIIY Adkins 370 Arnold Drive 420 Baker 330 Bates 800 Bayou Meto 660 Cato 576 Clinton 833 College Station 340 Crystal Hill 820 Dupree 465 fulfer -5 Harris 525 Jacksonville 785 Landmark 568 Lawson 325 Oak Grove 476 Oakbrooke 500 Pine Forest 556 Pinewood 523 Robinson 450 Scott 280 Sherwood 460 Sylvan Hills 456 Murrell Taylor 450 ?~\u0026lt;if Tolleson 570 I?-, I P. 02 7-, qo~ NOV-21-T0U0 E0 3:46P M FAXN O. P. 01 ... j ' Pulaski County Special School District Date: f I }/1'1 loD I ' Time: -------- To:~C 7~o~ From: ~b~-~i---04 1:-.\n._[J_fJ FAX COVER Number of Pages: (including cover sheet) cQ P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-86D1 925 East Dixon Rd. (501) 490-2000 http://pcssdweb.k12.ar.us LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 57 01 55 02 62 03 58 04 61 05 66 SCHOOL 359 TOTALS EXCLUDE 302 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: WHITE BLACK M F M F 5 6 20 25 9 8 23 15 9 9 18 23 13 9 20 14 13 13 161119 13 ,,1.e 9 21\n}: 21 62 54 118 117 32.3% 65.5% 57 48 98 92 34.8% 62.9% GRADE SPAN: HISPANIC ASIAN/PI M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 t,57-- 2. 2% .0% 4 3 0 0 2.3% .0% OCT2 3 'lOOO OfflCEOt WEGREG1O'1N\\0\\lNO R\\NG AMBOY ELEMENTARY K-05 AM IND/ALS NAT M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% LEA #60-02-058 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 44 01 42 02 42 03 41 04 47 05 45 SCHOOL 261 TOTALS EXCLUDE 217 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F M F M F 18 10 7 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 13 10 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 13 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 9 7 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 11 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ~? 10 11 :'?) 14 0 1, 0 0 0 0 0 75\\ 60 56\\?-: 67 1 0 1 1 0 0 51. 7% 47 .1% ~11, . 4% .8% .0% 57 50 49 60 0 0 0 1 0 0 49.3% 50.2% .0% .5% .0% ~-------------- -- -- -- ---- PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-054 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F :\n- 13.,, 11711 J 34 0 2 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 84 6 3 32 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 70 3 3 28 35 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 65 4 2 28 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 68 4 3 37 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 73 0 )l 8 26 ~39 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 51 0 1 25}..o 24 1 j- 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 445 17 22 189 214 2 1 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 8.8% 90. 6%- f/'l- . 7 %- . 0 %- . 0 %- EXCLUDE 327 11 17 144 153 1 1 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 8. 6%- 90. 8%- . 6 %- . 0 %- . 0 %- ~---------- ----- - PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-069 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 54 1 1 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 53 2 0 17 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 68 3 3 35 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 50 6 4 22 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 43 2 3 15 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 47 6 ?P 2 17,22 0 l) 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 315 20 13 132 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 10.5% 89.5% 1f)1 .0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 261 19 12 106 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 11.9% 88.1% .0% .0% .0% LEA #60-02-060 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 01 02 03 04 05 59 65 74 71 59 53 SCHOOL 381 TOTALS EXCLUDE 322 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE M F 8 5 7 7 15 8 9 11 2 6 4 i~ 7 45 44 23.4% 37 39 23.6% BLACK M F 29 16 20 31 26 25 23 26 25 :,26 23~1) 19 146 143 75.9% 117 127 75.8% HISPANIC M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 ~ , ~ 1t..,1, . 8% 1 1 .6% ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,- 0 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-061 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 23 4 3 7 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 01 24 6 3 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 34 7 3 11 11 0 0 0 0 1 1 03 28 3 6 9 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 04 33 2 2 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 41 2 ~{p 5 16 JD 16 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 SCHOOL 183 24 22 681 62 1 1 1 1 2 1 TOTALS 25.1% 71.0% 117, 1.1% 1.1% 1.6% EXCLUDE 160 20 19 61 55 1 1 0 1 1 1 GRD K/J 24.4% 72.5% 1.3% .6% 1.3% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-063 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 73 13 11 22 20 4 3 0 0 0 0 01 71 20 10 16 13 5 5 0 1 1 0 02 75 10 16 19 21 8 1 0 0 0 0 03 83 16 18 19 24 4 1 0 0 1 0 04 81 17 10 16 25 7 6 0 0 0 0 05 64 9#~12 19 b11 91.P 4 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 447 85 77 111~114 ~ 37 20 0 1 2 0 TOTALS 36.2% 50.3% J\" 12.8% .2% .4% EXCLUDE 374 72 66 89 94 33 17 0 1 2 0 GRD K/J 36.9% 48.9% 13. 4% .3% .5% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-055 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 54 20 15 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 61 18 16 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 60 21 20 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 52 17 13 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 51 17 18 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 45 11 0 '/16 9 ,\\ 9 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 323 104, 98 60 \\ 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 62.5% 37.5% J11\" . 0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 269 84 83 52 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 62.1% 37.9% 0~ 0 .0% .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-064 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 32 4 6 8 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 01 29 6 6 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 36 7 6 10 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 03 46 8 10 14 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 04 35 4 8 11 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 48 11'611.0. t. ue,'~13 0 '3 1 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 226 40 46 67 65 ~~1-4 3 0 0 0 1 TOTALS 38.1% 58.4% 3.1% .0% .4% EXCLUDE 194 36 40 59 53 3 3 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 39.2% 57.7% 3.1% .0% .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-065 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 61. 01 62 02 59 03 51 04 63 05 64 SCHOOL 360 TOTALS EXCLUDE 299 GRD K/J 11 9 18 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 1. 9 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 11 14 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 1.1 27 A 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 10 ,i 16 24? 14 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 64\\ 64 122 102 t.~1-3 2 1. 0 1 1. 35.6% 62.2% 1.4% . 3% .6% 53 55 1.04 80 2 2 1 0 1 1 36.1% 61.5% 1. 3% .3% .7% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-053 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 27 5 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 23 3 7 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 33 14 4 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 03 22 4 8 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 27 5 10 3 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 13 4 1 3 ~5 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 06 1 1 ,tO 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 146 36 34 36 36 ~91 1 3 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 47.9% 49.3% 2. 7% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 119 31 30 26 28 1 3 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 51.3% 45.4% 3.4% Og,. 0 .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-056 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 17 1 2 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 21 0 3 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 31 4 3 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 25 3 2 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 31 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 31 3 'J,.'?2J 13f/'13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 156 11 12 77 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 14.7% 85.3% \u0026lt;-p7 .0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 139 10 10 69 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 14.4% 85.6% .0% .0% .0% LEA #60-02-057 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 68 21 24 11 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 01 71 27 22 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 72 24 26 9 11 0 0 1 l 0 0 03 64 21 23 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 71 18 26 10 15 1 0 0 0 l 0 05 59 18~:\\ 17 ll~ 10 0 ,o 0 0 2 0 l SCHOOL 405 129 138 58 70 2 0 3 3 1 l TOTALS 65.9% 31.6% p?o .5% 1.5% .5% EXCLUDE 337 108 114 47 60 2 0 1 3 l 1 GRD K/J 65.9% 31.8% .6% 1. 2% .6% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 130 K 16 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS EXCLUDE 0 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD PRE-SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F '8'17 M F M F ,o ,,~ -4 4 6 58 58 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1\\ 1 7 19\\ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 65 66 2 2 0 0 0 0 7.5% 89. 7% ~o7 2.7% .0% .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% .0% .0% O!l- 0 O!l- 0 ELEMENTARY WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M \u0026gt;\\DF'\\ M f6F M F M F M F h ).,ti\u0026gt; 1\\~ ELEM 4153 716 691 1305 1323 60 36 6 6 6 4 WITH K 33.9% 63.3% t,'1' 2.3% .3% .2% ELEM 3320 595 583 1021 1026 48 31 2 6 5 3 W/0 K/J 35.5% 61.7% 2.4% .2% .2% LEA #60-02-076 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLRHS-WEST CAMPUS GRADE SPAN: 11-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 09 23 3 1 7 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 120 19 11 50 35 3 2 0 0 0 0 11 588 153 145 120 149 5 8 1 4 1 2 12 514 137 133 103 129 2 5 1 4 0 0 SCHOOL 1245 312 290 280 322 12 16 2 8 1 2 TOTALS 48.4% 48.4% 2.2% .8% 2 9- 0 l,() 'Y l.toY \u0026gt;l \\ Ji'67,. LEA #60-02-075 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLRHS-EAST CAMPUS GRADE SPAN: 09-10 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 09 669 158 165 162 167 5 8 2 2 0 0 10 687 156 159 165 197 6 3 0 l 0 0 SCHOOL 1356 314 324 327 364 ll ll 2 3 0 0 TOTALS 47.1% 51.0% 1.6% .4% .0% ,.,~~ \u0026lt;,I\\ ~1 jlt\" LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 13 07 6 08 27 09 57 10 40 11 17 12 11 SCHOOL 171 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F M F M F 1 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 28 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 26 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 9 92 44 0 1 0 0 0 0 19.9% 79.5% .6% .0% .0% ~4 ,i4 ie1 LEA #60-02- COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 2 10 6 11 16 12 4 SCHOOL 28 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SHORTER NOW GRADE SPAN: 7-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 53.6% 42.9% 3.6% .0% .0% /? f?' _\n/?.1. 1 NAT LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 267 08 245 SCHOOL 512 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 42 37 90 89 6 2 0 0 0 1 40 47 80 70 3 4 1 0 0 0 82 84 170 159 9 6 1 0 0 1 32.4% 64.3% 2.9% .2% 2 !!,, a ,i~ .??-9 ,1 \u0026amp;~7 NAT LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 259 08 216 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 83 92 46 35 2 1 0 0 0 0 69 61 43 42 0 0 0 0 0 1 SCHOOL 475 152 153 89 77 2 1 0 0 0 1 .2% TOTALS 64.2% 34.9% .6% .0% Jo? ,tt4 1 jl/??o NAT LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 1 07 124 08 122 09 5 10 1 SCHOOL 253 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 42 50 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 24 48 36 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 39 94 87 1 3 0 0 0 0 26.9% 71.5% 1.6% .0% .0% (qi ,~, 1 ~~o NAT LEA #60-02-059 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR ST MIDDLE GRADE SPAN: 06 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 06 643 125 116 209 179 7 5 1 1 0 0 SCHOOL 643 125 116 209 179 7 5 1 1 0 0 TOTALS 37.5% 60.3% 1.9% .3% .0% ~4\\ :,i~ ,\u0026gt;/ ~o7 SECONDARY WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M F M F M F M F M F SEC 4683 1043 1026 1269 1236 43 43 6 12 l 4 44.2% 53.5% 1.8% . 4% .1% ,?,ol, ~\n?.~r\u0026gt;? 109 ~~7 I ---------- DISTRICT WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M F M F M F M F M F 8836 1759 1717 2574 2559 103 79 12 18 7 8 39.3% 58.1% 2.1% 3 g. 0 . 2% W/0 8003 1638 1609 2290 2262 91 74 8 18 6 7 GRD J/K 40.6% 56.9% 2.1% .3% .2% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY GRADE , LEA #60-02-000 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK GRADE SPAN: PK-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M ~ F M F M F 4 #\" 8 71 ,~ 176 '70(1 J 164 3 2 0 0 0 0 K 669 117 100 213 221 9 3 4 0 1 1 01 647 124 105 194 209 7 6 0 1 1 0 02 711 138 117 216 218 11 6 1 2 1 1 03 659 124 127 205 188 9 5 0 0 1 0 04 675 107 126 201 220 9 8 1 0 2 1 05 627 101 108 205 191 12 6 0 3 0 1 06 658 127 117 219 181 7 5 1 1 0 0 07 656 143 143 180 176 9 4 0 0 0 1 08 610 127 134 187 151 3 6 1 0 0 1 09 756 173 172 201 190 7 9 2 2 0 0 10 854 180 173 242 243 9 6 I 0 1 0 0 11 621 157 153 129 160 6 8 1 4 1 2 12 529 137 134 111 135 2 5 1 4 0 0 EX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8836 1759 1717 2574 2559 103 79 12 18 7 8 :.4'71., ,.,?\"\u0026gt; 1?~1 ~1\" -~f /9 I~ I \u0026lt;g,io~ ~1~/ \u0026lt;:9/~d c\n\u0026gt;\nlt, 'i-/4 LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 57 01 55 02 62 03 58 04 61 05 66 SCHOOL 359 TOTALS GRADES 3 02 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOO GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK e E\\\\JE 12 45 17 38 QC1 2 i 1\\1\\1\\1 21 41 Go~f\\~~:o tt\\10\\\\\\\\\\G 24 34 Ot~tlti~ 26 35 24 42 124 235 34.5% 65.5% 112 190 37.1% 62.9% LEA #60-02-058 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 44 01 42 02 42 03 41 04 47 05 45 SCHOOL 261 TOTALS GRADES 217 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 30 14 23 19 21 21 20 21 24 23 20 25 138 123 52.9% 47.1% 108 109 49.8% 50.2% LEA #60-02-054 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 34 K 84 01 70 02 65 03 68 04 73 05 51 SCHOOL 445 TOTALS GRADES 327 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 31 9 75 7 63 6 59 7 61 8 65 2 49 42 403 9.4% 90.6% 30 297 9.2% 90.8% LEA #60-02-069 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 54 01 53 02 68 03 50 04 43 05 47 SCHOOL 315 TOTALS GRADES 261 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEMENT GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 2 52 2 51 6 62 10 40 5 38 8 39 33 282 10.5% 89.5% 31 230 11.9% 88.1% LEA #60-02-060 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 59 01 65 02 74 03 71 04 59 05 53 SCHOOL 381 TOTALS GRADES 322 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 14 45 14 51 23 51 22 49 8 51 11 42 92 289 24.1% 75.9% 78 244 24.2% 75.8% LEA #60-02-061 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 23 01 24 02 34 03 28 04 33 05 41 SCHOOL 183 TOTALS GRADES 160 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 9 14 9 15 12 22 10 18 4 29 9 32 53 130 29.0% 71.0% 44 116 27.5% 72. 5% LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 73 01 71 02 75 03 83 04 81 05 64 SCHOOL 447 TOTALS GRADES 374 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTA GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 31 42 42 29 35 40 40 43 40 41 34 30 222 225 49.7% 50.3% 191 183 51.1% 48.9% LEA #60-02-055 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 54 01 61 02 60 03 52 04 51 05 45 SCHOOL 323 TOTALS GRADES 269 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 35 19 34 27 41 19 30 22 35 16 27 18 202 121 62.5% 37.5% 167 102 62.1% 37.9% LEA #60-02-064 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 32 01 29 02 36 03 46 04 35 05 48 SCHOOL 226 TOTALS GRADES 194 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 12 20 12 17 15 21 20 26 13 22 22 26 94 132 41.6% 58.4% 82 112 42.3% 57.7% LEA #60-02-065 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 61 01 62 02 59 03 51 04 63 05 64 SCHOOL 360 TOTALS GRADES 299 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 21 40 20 42 18 41 22 29 29 34 26 38 136 224 37.8% 62.2% 115 184 38.5% 61.5% LEA #60-02-053 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 27 01 23 02 33 03 22 04 27 05 13 06 1 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS GRADES 119 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 9 18 11 12 20 13 12 10 16 11 5 8 1 0 74 72 50.7% 49.3% 65 54 54.6% 45.4% LEA #60-02-056 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 17 01 21 02 31 03 25 04 31 05 31 SCHOOL 156 TOTALS GRADES 139 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 14 3 18 7 24 5 20 0 31 5 26 23 133 14.7% 85.3% 20 119 14.4% 85.6% LEA #60-02-057 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 68 01 71 02 72 03 64 04 71 05 59 SCHOOL 405 TOTALS GRADES 337 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTAR GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 47 21 50 21 52 20 44 20 46 25 38 21 277 128 68.4% 31.6% 230 107 68.2% 31.8% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 130 K 16 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS GRADES 0 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD PRE-SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 14 116 1 15 15 131 10.3% 89.7% 0 0 .0% .0% ELEMENTARY NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS ELEM 4153 1525 2628 WITH K 36.7% 63.3% ELEM 3320 1273 2047 01-05 38.3% 61.7% LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 23 10 120 11 588 12 514 SCHOOL 1245 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 11-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 7 16 35 85 319 269 282 232 643 602 51.6% 48.4% LEA #60-02-075 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 10 669 687 SCHOOL 1356 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 09-10 NON-BLACK 340 325 665 49.0% BLACK 329 362 691 51.0% LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 13 07 6 08 27 09 57 10 40 11 17 12 11 SCHOOL 171 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 12 2 4 8 19 16 41 5 35 2 15 1 10 35 136 20.5% 79.5% LEA #60-02- COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 2 10 6 11 16 12 4 SCHOOL 28 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA-SHORTER NOW GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 1 4 2 11 5 0 4 16 12 57.1% 42.9% LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 267 08 245 SCHOOL 512 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 88 95 183 35. 7% BLACK 179 150 329 64.3% LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 259 08 216 SCHOOL 475 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 178 131 309 65.1% BLACK 81 85 166 34.9% LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 1 07 124 08 122 09 5 10 1 SCHOOL 253 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 0 32 92 38 84 1 4 0 1 72 181 28.5% 71.5% LEA #60-02-059 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 643 SCHOOL 643 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLES NON-BLACK 255 255 39.7% BLACK 388 388 60.3% GRADE SPAN: 06 .__ _________ - ----- SECONDARY TOTALS SEC 4683 NON-BLACK 2178 46.5% '---------------- BLACK 2505 53.5% DISTRICT NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS 8836 3703 5133 41.9% 58.1% W/O 8003 3451 4552 GR K\u0026amp;J 43.1% 56.9% M(D)JETIBIL IITTIL~ JE(D)CClfFil:1 IJiffiILIICCC CIBI@@IL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES October 20, 2000 Ms. Melissa Guldin Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Suite 501 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guldin: 2700 POPLAR STREET RECE\\\"E QC,' 2~. 2000 Ofr\\COtr lllQ OtStG\\\\t~\\\\OII0\\\\\\ \\\\10W Enclosed please find the October 1, 2000 report from the North Little Rock School District. Please call me if you have any questions. Francical J. Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Enclosures AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P.O. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O, P. 03 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL IAd~ins Elem~ntary J PK .. 0 4 8 8 0 0 20 K 10 8 12 16 0 1 47 1 12 9 11 8 1 0 41 2 13 8 9 12 1 0 43 3 8 12 10 7 0 0 37 4 14 13 13 7 0 0 47 5 12 7 8 4 0 0 31 School Totat 69 61 , 71 62 2 1 2661 leaker lnterdistrict.. , K 17 19 2 2 0 0 40 1 25 13 3 4 0 0 45 2 23 19 3 4 0 0 49 3 26 19 2 1 0 0 48 4 16 12 5 4 0 0 37 5 16 19 5 7 0 0 47 6 23 22 3 5 0 0 53 School Total 146 123 23 27 0 0 319! Crystal Hill Magnet . PK 15 9 13 16 1 0 54 K 25 30 19 24 0 0 98 1 32 22 29 21 0 0 104 2 28 18 28 20 0 0 94 3 29 24 19 22 0 0 94 4 34 20 23 33 0 0 110 5 27 28 30 21 3 0 109 6 :25 30 21 15 1 1 93 chool total 215 1B1 182 172 5 1 756] . Bayou Melo Elemetita!l'. K 46 27 0 1 2 0 76 1 35 45 1 0 1 0 82 2 33 43 1 1 0 1 79 3 38 45 1 0 1 3 88 4 41 35 2 0 1 0 79 5 38 42 3 2 1 2 88 6 32 29 0 3 0 0 64 , ~chool Total 263,' 266 8 ,7 6 6. 5561 Page 1 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 04 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOL/GRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Clinton Magnet School . 1 PK 21 18 12 17 0 4 72 K 21 22 24 13 1 0 81 1 21 21 22 21 6 3 94 2 17 31 25 29 2 0 104 3 18 27 16 25 2 1 89 4 29 24 27 32 0 0 112 5 20 20 20 25 4 0 89 6 21 16 19 25 2 2 85 School Total 168 : 179 165 187 17, 10 7261 Dupree Elementa~ : I K 26 15 5 6 0 0 52 1 12 18 9 8 1 2 50 2 11 17 7 8 3 3 49 3 29 17 11 8 0 2 67 4 10 23 7 6 4 0 50 5 13 18 7 8 1 1 48 School Total -101 108 46 44,' g 8 3161 C: .Harris Elementary ] K 6 2 6 5 0 0 19 1 7 2 8 10 1 0 28 2 11 6 14 4 0 1 36 3 4 5 8 12 0 0 29 4 9 8 14 14 2 1 48 5 8 5 15 7 1 0 36 6 7 9 8 10 0 1 35 School Total 52 37 73 62 4 3 231f Jacksonville Elementary K 30 23 30 23 0 0 106 1 26 23 20 25 0 0 94 2 16 17 22 31 1 1 8S 3 23 21 31 24 0 0 99 4 16 21 28 19 0 1 85 5 22 19 25 24 0 0 90 School Total ~33 . 124 156 146 1 2 5621 Pago 2 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 05 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL . Landmark Elementary PK 8 8 5 9 0 0 30 K 11 7 10 10 0 1 39 1 18 10 13 10 1 0 52 2 15 11 9 9 1 0 45 3 15 21 10 16 0 1 63 4 17 15 14 18 1 1 66 6 18 19 14 12 1 1. 65 6 15 18 15 12 0 0 60 C School Total 117 109 90 96' 4 4 420! Lawso.n Element.ary :1 K 20 16 5 4 0 0 45 1 17 14 0 1 0 0 32 2 11 10 4 4 0 0 29 3 22 13 3 4 0 0 42 4 15 14 4 3 0 0 36 5 21 18 7 4 0 0 50 6 14 11 1 2 0 0 28 School Total 120 96 24 22 0 0 262! Tolleson Elementary K 26 18 5 8 2 1 60 1 24 21 4 8 1 1 59 2 20 20 9 8 5 3 65 3 21 23 8 9 0 1 62 4 22 16 7 6 3 3 57 5 22 15 11 4 1 2 55 6 14 24 10 4 2 1 55 SchQoi Total 149 137 54 47 14 12 .. 1.3! Oak Grove Elementary : I PK* 22 30 12 5 2 0 71 K 20 15 6 5 0 0 46 1 16 21 5 5 2 1 50 2 15 18 3 8 1 0 45 3 15 21 5 7 1 0 49 4 28 16 7 7 0 0 58 5 18 22 8 6 1 0 55 6 16 20 4 6 3 0 49 :, , School Total 150 163 50 I D 10 1 4231 Page 3of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 06 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Robinson Elementary., K 21 14 5 4 0 2 46 1 22 16 4 3 0 0 45 2 26 15 8 5 0 0 54 3 24 16 4 11 0 0 55 4 30 20 7 8 0 0 65 5 21 14 8 9 1 0 53 6 33 21 14 12 0 1 81 [ School Total 177. 116 50 52 1 31 399 Scott ~lementary School ] K 12 8 2 2 0 0 24 1 12 8 1 7 0 0 28 2 7 4 3 4 0 0 18 3 3 7 5 3 0 0 18 4 5 7 2 5 0 0 19 5 4 2 1 4 0 0 11 6 8 7 7 2 0 0 24 School Total 51 43 21 27, 0 0 1421 Sherwood Elernemtary, ] K 24 11 9 6 1 1 52 1 15 17 7 12 0 0 51 2 16 22 10 6 0 0 54 3 24 17 11 10 0 0 62 4 15 18 7 9 0 0 49 5 15 17 10 12 1 1 56 6 17 14 17 4 0 0 52 SchoolTo~I 126 116 71 5.9 2 2 3761 I\n: S~lvan HIiis Elementary K 18 21 6 10 0 3 58 1 16 15 5 4 0 0 40 2 13 15 9 12 0 0 49 3 23 19 6 16 1 0 65 4 29 20 16 9 1 0 75 5 31 25 9 10 0 1 76 6 23 14 17 15 1 2 72 SchoolTotal 15~ 129 68 'ii 3 6 ~51 Page 4 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 07 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Jacksonville Middle School .1 6 93 100 75 65 2 1 336 7 92 107 59 72 2 3 33, School Total 185 207, 134 137\" 4 4 511.1 Jacksonville Jr High 8 107 97 77 67 0 1 349 9 103 95 76 80 0 0 354 School Total 210 192 . 1~3 147, 0 1 1-031 Fuller Jr ~if!h School. 7 56 56 64 53 0 2 231 8 75 57 57 50 1 1 241 9 75 64 66 55 2 1 263 'Sct,ool Total ,206 177 187 .158 3 4 7351 Sylvan Hills Jr ttigh. 7 113 81 61 54 5 1 315 8 104 73 51 61 4 3 296 9 98 98 56 46 0 2 302 School Total 315 .252 1'70 , 161 9 6 9131 C Jacksonville Sr High 10 105 102 56 52 2 2 319 11 100 98 47 61 0 7 313 12 77 69 42 48 2 1 239 School Total 28~ 269 . 145 , 161.' 4 10. 871) Mills niveralty High .. I 10 39 42 36 37 31 29 214 11 69 44 37 39 6 2 197 12 62 49 32 35 2 0 180 School Total 170 135 105. 111 '3$. 31 5911 Page 5 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 08 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM Wf BM BF OM OF TOTAL c:Oak Grove Jr/Sr High . I 7 45 51 13 27 0 0 136 8 61 41 21 20 2 0 145 9 70 60 19 26 3 1 179 10 63 56 17 21 2 2 161 11 50 54 18 10 1 1 134 12 38 34 7 13 1 0 93 C School Total 327 296 95 117 9 4 8481 [- ~obim\non Sr. Hi!ih 10 88 58 25 14 2 0 187 11 54 41 26 20 0 2 143 12 43 48 16 12 0 0 119 School Total 185 147 67 46 2 2 449J Sylvan Hills Sr High 10 111 96 33 44 0 0 284 11 97 83 39 32 0 0 251 12 64 62 21 30 0 0 177 Schoo 1 I Total 272 241 93 1Q6 0 C) r121 Catq Elementary K 28 21 9 8 0 0 66 1 34 26 5 9 2 3 79 2 20 22 8 12 1 2 65 3 37 17 10 12 2 1 79 4 27 23 11 7 1 1 70 5 27 25 12 7 0 0 71 6 28 27 14 12 0 0 81 [ : School Total 201 1,61 . 69 67 '. i 7 5111 Pinewood Elementary : ] K 32 19 15 10 3 0 79 1 18 18 15 11 2 0 64 2 27 17 11 14 0 0 69 3 24 23 8 14 0 2 71 4 18 18 15 19 3 0 73 5 15 20 14 13 0 0 62 'School Total 134 115 78 '81 8 2 4181 Page 6of 10 Date: 11109/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P, 09 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL college Station Elementary I K 5 2 1 2 0 0 10 1 2 0 6 4 0 0 12 2 2 1 5 5 0 0 13 3 12 5 9 17 0 1 44 4 17 8 9 12 1 1 48 5 16 21 5 6 2 1 51 6 13 21 8 5 1 1 49 School Total 67 58 43 51 4 4 221I ( Nort\" Pulaski 1:iigh 1 10 100 75 50 43 6 6 280 11 81 66 30 30 6 4 217 12 61 58 22 22 4 4 171 School Total 242 199 102 95 16 14\n668! Arnold Drive Elementa~ J K 35 23 7 10 2 1 78 1 32 24 4 6 3 5 74 2 27 23 12 4 1 2 69 3 21 20 9 8 3 3 64 4 27 14 8 6 1 4 60 s 9 15 6 8 3 2 43 6 24 9 9 7 2 1 52 School Total H5 128 55 49 15 18 4401 L Oakbrooke Elementary K 11 16 4 7 0 0 38 1 16 16 7 11 0 0 50 2 20 12 13 10 0 0 55 3 15 23 7 8 2 0 55 4 16 12 3 9 0 0 40 5 24 18 13 14 0 0 69 6 19 22 7 7 0 0 55 School Total 121 119 54 .66 2 i5 3s21 Northwooc\nJtr High 7 90 77 29 37 3 2 238 8 93 83 50 38 6 3 273 9 121 90 24 33 4 8 280 School Total ,304 250 '1Q3 108 n 13 .7911 Page 7 of 10 Date: 11/09(2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :31A M FAXN O. P. 10 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Murrell'.Taylor Elementary . :1 K 17 18 9 10 0 1 55 1 14 17 9 9 0 0 49 2 19 12 14 15 0 0 60 3 20 18 20 4 0 0 62 4 19 13 14 7 0 0 53 5 23 22 13 15 0 1 74 C School Total 112 100 ,79 60 O 2 3531 [ f:'ine For~st Elementari K 22 20 10 6 0 1 59 1 23 24 2 7 1 1 58 2 26 11 9 3 0 1 50 3 36 30 5 6 0 4 81 4 26 26 5 6 2 0 65 5 32 31 14 7 2 1 87 6 32 19 11 5 4 2 73 . _ School Total 197 1'61 56 40 9 10 4731 Robinson Jr High 7 67 54 35 18 0 1 175 8 58 54 21 28 0 1 162 9 46 54 26 16 0 1 143 School Total 1-71 162 82 62 0 3 48ol Bates Elementary PK* 14 11 22 13 0 0 60 K 25 22 13 28 0 0 88 1 23 25 29 19 0 0 96 2 18 20 20 19 1 1 79 3 25 19 24 29 2 0 99 4 21 32 27 32 1 0 113 5 24 23 38 34 0 0 119 6 31 17 28 25 0 0 101 . Sct,ool Tot.ii 181 169 201 199 4 1 ' 7551 Page 8 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :31A M FAXN O. P. 11 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL [ TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLL~INT I : Grade Total: PK\" 80 :so 72 68 ,,3 4 3071 K 508 397 214 220 11 12 1,362 1 472 425 219 223 22 16 1,377 2 434 392 256 247 17 15 1,361 3 512 462 242 273 14 19 1,522 4 501 428 275 278 21 12 1,515 5 476 465 296 263 22 13 1,535 6 488 450 288 241 18 13 1,498 Grade Totals: K 6 3,391 3,01~ 1,79Q 1\n745_ 125 100 10,1101 ~ - - Eiamenta-fotai-\n. - - 3Jrr-. jjiu. -im -LID-. ~.ur-3. ~. TliJii~ ------ __ 'I_ _______ ----~- -- ___ _.. -- -----~--- ---- - 7 464 427 264 263 10 9 1,437 8 503 406 279 266 13 9 1,476 9 533 466 282 260 10 13 1,564 [ Grade Totals: 7 9 1,500 1,2~9 825. 789 33 31 4,41-,1 10 515 432 221 216 44 40 1,468 11 458 389 202 197 13 17 1,276 12 353 327 150 168 9 5 1,012 'Grade Totals: 10 -12 1,326 1,148 573 '581 66 62: '3,7561 1 - - -secondiryToT-aiS- . - ~-Im. uia- Ui.b-:.-.- u. - i 3 -i2'13i ---~---~---~---~-----~-------~-~--------------- - - -orstriciTotaT- s... .. - ... -. - f4- - -. -~- -m --iii- -- ., I. - - - - .. - - - - - - -~. - - .. --~..\n.. - - -- - - - ~I Page 10 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 02 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 13, 2000 Ann Brown.Marshall Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown-Marshall: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Ro~k. Arkansas 72216-8601 .. (501) 490-2000 Atlached is the October 1, 2000 enrollment counts for Pulaski County Special School District. The following schools are outside the racial balance guidelines: Adkjns Elementary - 52% Bak.er Elementary - 15% Bates Elementary - 54% Harris Elementary- 61 % Jacksonville Elementary- 54% Landmark Elementary - 45% Lawson Elementary - 19% Fuller Jr. High 47% Sincerely, Karl Brown Assistant Superintendent Equity and Pupil Services ac c Houston Yuille Sam Jones John Walker NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 01 Pulaski County Special School District Date: \\ \\-\\ 5- 'D D Time: 9'. is o...m FAX COVER To: ____,__\\\\.i..:,:.~:)_._o~c-=\nc\n=\n.\n.....,~..o_\u0026lt;...:.._.v:':.:\n_::l_.~-_-_,_ _ _ Number of Pages: (including cover sheet) -\"-- Message: _____________ _ P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 722168601 925 East Dixon Rd. (501) 4902000 http:l/pcssdweb.k12.ar.us\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1027","title":"\"Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two Year Comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), Department of Planning Research and Evaluation,\" Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-09-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Student assistance programs","School improvement programs","Educational statistics","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["\"Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two Year Comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), Department of Planning Research and Evaluation,\" Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1027"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["131 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nArkansas Aviation Historical Society banquet programs (1992), Legal documents, correspondence, newspaper clippings, notes\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nS /J// . mwd /Ill ~ Exhibit No. 67: Ll230-90 Program Evaluation for Lyceum Scholars Program at Philander Smith College. 12:02 PM I I Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two year comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS) September 22, 2000 Dr. Ed R. Williams Little Rock School District (LRSD) Department of Planning Research and Evaluation 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 501-324-2125 Draft Summary Performance and achievement data, plus year-end survey data from students, parents, staff, and building principals for the Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS) Program at Philander Smith were collected and analyzed for SY 1998-1999 and 1999-2000. The LSHS program is a computer-based instructional learning environment using PLATO software. Program goals are to improve student achievement, grade level perfonnance, and attendance via an alternative learning environment (ALE). Student perfonnance data indicates a reduction in school absenteeism, but an increase in days suspended. Student achievement data is mixed. LSHS students, as measured by the PLATO software, are performing at grade level. Also, LSHS students outperform the LRSD average scores in math Achievement Level Test (ALT) scores. However, these students are below the LRSD average in reading and language usage ALT scores. SYl 999-2000 survey results indicate that student satisfaction increased over the SYI 998-1999 results. However, students, parents, and staff continue to be dissatisfied with food service. Also, both students and parents would like more classroom time and less time on PLATO. Students and parents are also dissatisfied with the morning bus arrival times. Staff would like more support in instructional delivery. Principals of feeder schools would like more data and information about the program and LSHS staff should provide LSHS information to all LRSD principals. It is recommended for SY2000-2001 that the meal situation be resolved, that a ibnasltarnucceti obne ael sstaubplpioshrte. d between classroom and PLATO time, and that teachers receive more 12:02 PM 2 Draft Introduction The Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), grades 9 and 10, is one of three ALE programs in the LRSD. The other two programs are at Pennick Boys club, a middle level program, and Camp Pfeifer, an elementary program. The LSHS is designed for students with a high potential for success yet for several reasons are not progressing satisfactorily in the regular school setting. Students appropriate for the LSHS demonstrate excessive absences and need individualized teaching and instruction. The LSHS is designed to provide a success-oriented environment for students who would not nonnally obtain success. The LSHS offers a small class setting with an emphasis on core subjects. The curriculum is computer-based using PLATO software. Using this software, students can accelerate to a higher-grade level. The LSHS program is designed for completion of the entire secondary ocur rrreitcuurlnu mto. thAet rtehgeu claorm apslseigtinoend o sfc ehaocohl. academic year, a student may reapply to remain at LSHS LSHS admission requirements are 1. completing an application, 2. volunteering and remaining at LSHS a full year, 3. ahsasviignnge da srecchoomolm, endation from the Principal or Vice-Principal at the student's 4. having no long-tenn suspensions, and 5. being reviewed by a screening committee. Purpose The purpose of this evaluation is to 1. report and compare participation, perfonnance, and perception data on students in the LSHS SY1998-1999 and SY1999-2000\n2. ddaettae\nr manind e the relationship between PLATO assessment scores and other achievement 3. review results and propose recommendations. Methodology The following data will be compared: Participation data Race Gender Performance data 12:02 PM 3 Draft Average number of days suspended Average number of days absent Currant grade and grade gains of all students and of students who had attended an ALE the previous year, as measured by the PLATO computer software in: Language Math Reading Average Achievement Level Test (ALT) scores in math, reading, and language usage Correlation matrix using ALT scores and current level of PLATO assessment Perception data Survey results of students, parents, teachers, and administrators Results Participation Data SY1998-1999. Thirteen (13) students participated in the program, with eight students participating the full year, and five srudents participating less than a full school year. Demographic data for the students are 77% male and 23% female, and 77% Black and 23% White. Eight students completed the survey. SY1999-2000. Twelve (12) students participated in the program. Ten of the twelve srudents had attended an ALE the previous year, 6 at Pennick and 4 at LSHS. Eight students completed the survey. Demographic data for students completing the survey are five males (62.5%) and three females (37.5%), and 57% African-American, 29% White, and 14% Other. Five of the students had been at an ALE the previous year. Performance Data Suspension and Absenteeism Data for LSHS Students SY1998-1999 Average days suspended from LSHS SY1999-2000 2.07 .58 Average days absent from LSHS 3.92 5.83 increaseWd.h ile the average number of days suspended has decreased, the average days absent has 12:02 PM 4 Draft Average Grade Level Gain for LSHS Students SY1998-1999 Program -SY1999-2000 Program Change Program Program Change entry exit entry exit Language Arts 3.51 7.7 +4.19 3.22 9.7 +6.48 Reading 4.49 8.08 +3.59 4.05 9.05 +5 Math 4.96 6.67 +1.71 5.29 9 +3.71 Students during SY1999-2000 had greater grade gains than students during SY1998-1999. Average Grade Level for Students who had attended an ALE for Two Years Average Average Change: Average Change: score: score: Spring to score: Fall to Spring Fall Fall Spring Spring 1999 1999 2000 Language Arts 6.71 2.45 -4.26 9.57 +7.12 Math 6.63 4.73 -1.9 8.92 +4.19 Reading 7.4 3.81 -3.59 8.95 +5.15 There was a sharp decline from spring of 1999 to fall of 1999 scores as measured by the PLATO software. However, gains during SY1999-2000 (Fall to Spring) resulted in average scores at least one and a half grade levels above the end of SY1998-1999 results. Average ALT Scores ALE Student ALT Average Score Middle District Average ALT Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Level Math Level 3u, Grade Math 210 202 21 6 213 216 218 SY1999-2000 (N = 3) 9u Grade 218 208 215 213 221 223 SY1999-2000 (N = 4) Both grade levels were below the District average in reading and language, and gth grade students were below in math. Ninth grade students were above the District average in math. However, the District average was based on 30 students. 9th grade students typically take the Algebra I test 12:02 PM 5 Draft LSHS Student Scores Compared to their Assigned School: Southwest Middle School ALE Student ALT Average Score Middle Southwest Average ALT Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Leve] (N =2) (N = 1) Level Math Math (N = 2) 8u' Grade 210 202 216 209 2 12 215 SY1999-2000 (N= 3) Students at LSHS did as well in math and language as students in their assigned school. LSHS Student Scores Compared to their Assigned School: Central, Fair, and HaJl ALE Student ALT Average Score Assigned School Average ALT Middle Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Level (N=4) (N=4) Level Math (N = 4) Math 9\"' Grade 218 208 215 240 223 224 SYI 999-2000 (N = 4) sScthuodoeln.t s at LSHS did not do as well in math, reading, and language as students in their assigned Correlation Matrix: ALT scores to Current PLATO Level at the End of SY 1999-2000 Math ALT Reading Language PLATO PLATO PLATO ALT ALT Math Reading Language Math ALT 1.00 .919* .854 .057 -.053 .277 Reading 1.00 .949 .353 .139 .173 ALT Language ALT .207 -.231 -.050 PLATO - 1.00 .885* .847* Math PLATO Reading .721 * PLATO , ~'''}~~~! Language 1.00 ~ .01 level 12:02 PM 'I 6 Draft The number of students used in this analysis was low (N = 12), which makes interpretation difficult. Data from the other two ALE programs could improve the power of the correlation design. However, while there is a significant relationship among subject scores within ALT and sPuLbAjeTcOt s creosrueslt.s , there is no significant relationship between ALT subject scores and PLATO Perception Data Program evaluation surveys were distributed to students, parents, and teachers who participated in LSHS. Surveys were also sent to school principals from whence students last attended. Survey participants were asked to respond either very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied to statements concerning: 1. application process, 2. facilities, 3. student services, 4. interactions with personnel, 5. instructional program, 6. transportation, 7. administrative support, 8. staff and student/parent interactions, and 9. food service. Additional questions were asked of the participants concerning: 1. plans after high school, 2. plans for next year, 3. would the participant recommend the program to others, 4. overall satisfaction with the program, and 5. need for program expansion. iSmpparcoev wemase naltsso. available for comments by participants concerning program changes or SY 1998-1999 student results. Students were dissatisfied with the following: 1. Student Services Health services 2. Instructional Program English instruction Social studies instruction Homework 12:02 PM 7 Draft 3. Food Service Meals provided by LRSD Meals in student center Students were satisfied with the remaining statements. Responding to the question concerning overall program satisfaction, 37.5% (N = 3) were very satisfied, 50% (N = 4) were satisfied, and 13% (N =I) were dissatisfied. Concerning plans after high school, 25% (N = 2) plan to enroll in a four-year college, 25% (N = 2) to enroll in a two-year college, 13% (N =1) to enroll in a technical training program, 25% (N = 2) were undecided, and 13% (N = 1) did not respond. Student comments are in Appendix A. SY1999-2000 student results. Students were dissatisfied with: restrooms, orientation, meals provide by LRSD, meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College, and morning bus arrival. Students were satisfied with the remaining statements. Responding to the question concerning overall program satisfaction, 37.5% (N = 3) were very satisfied, and 62.5% (N = 5) were satisfied. Concerning plans after high school, 50% (N = 4) plan to enroll in a four-year college, 13% (N = 1) to enroll in a two-year college, 25% (N = 2) were undecided, and 13% (N= 1) did Ano).t respond. Students would like less time on PLATO and more classroom time (see Appendix SYI 998-1999 parent results. Three parents responded to the survey. Parents were very satisfied with their child's persona] academic progress and were satisfied with most of the statements. Parents were dissatisfied with: classroom environment, field trips, health services, meals in the student center, meals provided by LRSD, staff providing nurture and support to students, and social studies instruction. Half of the responding parents had volunteered at the school and wished for their child to return to the LSHS program next year. Most parents, 67%, were satisfied with the overall program and half of the responding parents would recommend the LSHS program to others. Parents were concerned about the quality of the food and interaction of students with teachers. Parent comments are in Appendix C. 12:02 PM 8 Draft dissatisfSieYd1 w99it9h-:2 000 parent results. Ten parents responded to the survey. Parents were meals provided by LRSD, meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College, and morning bus arrival. Parents were satisfied with the remaining statements. Less than half ( 40%) of the responding parents had volunteered at the school. 70% wished for their child to return to the LSHS program next year. All of the parents were satisfied with the overall program and 90% of parents would recommend the LSHS program to others. Parents would like to see less time using PLATO and more classroom time (see Appendix B). SYl 998-1999 staff results. Staff (N= 2) were both satisfied with: student selection process, qualifications of staff, relationships with college personnel, mentoring/counseling, expectations for student behavior, support for disciplinary actions, service of Lyceum students in the student center, bus arrival and departure times, parent/staff interactions, and classrooms. Both of the staff were dissatisfied with: support in instructional tutoring, administration of food service, distribution of LRSD prepared meals, delivery ofLRSD prepared meals, and janitorial services. One of the staff recommend that the program continue next year and that the program be expanded to add another grade level. Also, half of the responding teachers/staff wished to return to the program next year. Recommendations for staff development and program change include Athpep neeneddi xf oCr . college level classes, security, and staff selection. Additional comments are in SY1999-2000 staff results. Staff (N = 3) were dissatisfied with support in instructional delivery, meals provided by the LRSD, and meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College. 12:02 PM \\ 9 Draft Staff were satisfied with the remaining statements. All of the staff recommended that the program continue, recommended that another grade level be added, wish to return to the program next year, and were satisfied with the program. Staff would like more space and teachers (see Appendix C). SY 1998-I 999 principal results. Principals (N ~ 2) did not have any recommendations for change and were satisfied with most of the statements. However, they were very satisfied with the qualifications of staff, computer-assisted instruction, and instructional methodology. SY 1999-2000 principal results. Principals (N== 3) were satisfied with all the Dst)a.t ements. Principals would like more data and infonnation about the program (see Appendix Discussion While suspensions were down from S YJ 998-1999 to SY l 999-2000, the average number of days absent was higher. PLATO gains and current levels for S YI 999-2000 are higher than the S YJ 998-I 999 results. However, these increased gains barely offset the sharp decrease in PLATO levels from spring to fall. Student's OUlperfonned the LRSD average in math ALT scores, but are below the LRSD average in reading and math. LSHS eighth grade students performed better in math and language, but 9 grade students performed below in math, reading, and language as compared to their assigned school peers on ALT scores. Due to a low sample size, it is difficult to interpret the relationship between ALT scores and PLATO levels. Students, parents, and teachern continue to register theIT dissatisfaction with the food service. Students and parents are also dissatisfied with the morning bus arrival. Staff would like more instructional LsuSpHpSo.r t and improved janitorial services. Principals would like more data and information about 12:02 PM IO Draft Recommendations 1. Resolve the dissatisfaction with the food service. 2. Improve the absenteeism rate. 3. Provide teachers with instructional support. 4. Determine and commit to a balance between PLATO and classroom time. 5. Resolve the dissatisfaction by students and parents with AM bus arrival. 6. Inform principals about the results of LSHS. 12:02PM Draft Appendix A Student Comments: S1998-1999 Better food next year. For the food to change \u0026amp; we have better lunches Student Comments: SY1999-2000 Less PLATO, more class time (This comment was made on fou,- surveys J Lunches 12:02 PM 12 Draft Appendix B Parent Comments: SY1998-1999 Have vou volunteered at school this year? II 'dw orautlhde nr onto mt. ind volunteering to end the Lyceum High School. As for any other reason Recommended changes: oTuhtasti dthe et hree mclaaisnsirnogo mstu. dents attending the Lyceum High School have a privilege to eat Recommended program changes: Just one teacher we has a problem with my daughter said she picked at her all the time. This teacher should have tried to find out why my daughter was feeling the way she was. And try to talk to her on her level (teen-ager), than just calling her a problem child. It atargkuesm tewnota ttoiv he.a ve a argument. My daughter \u0026amp; the teacher sounds like there both are wThhaetr et hhee pbreinlocnipgasl. would follow through on promises an my child to attend regular school The lunches that they are fed are terrible. Parent Comments: SY1999-2000 Less PLATO and more class time. (This comment was made on five surveys) 12:02PM 13 Draft 13 Appendix C Staff Comments: SY1998-1999 Recommendations for staff development: Let us take classes that count on the college level. Some of us just came out of college and can work a computer better than those who do staff development. Recommended program chanizes: eed security guard. Administrator on site everyday for program. Better selection, the process of selecting certifled teachers. For people over the program to visit more often and talk with the children. More visits among the Advisory Committee. Staff Comments: SY1999-2000 I would like to see more class space in the future. I haven't been teaching in the program long enough to make any recommendations. eed security officers and additional teachers. 12:02 PM ...I 14 Draft 14 12:02 PM Appendix D None Principal Conunents: SYI998-1999 Principal Comments: SYJ999-2000 You might consider providing us with more data about the program. You might consider yseeanrd. ing a representative to a faculty meeting for a short presentation early in the school 15 Draft 15 PROGRAM EVALUATION Philander Smith College/ LRSD Lyceum Scholars High School 1999 - 2000 This evaluation report is divided into two sections. Section I presents the results of four surveys that were completed by the following individuals: A. Students in the Lyceum Program B. Parents of Lyceum students C. Lyceum staff members D. LRSD administrators with students emolled in the Lyceum program Section II is a statistical analysis of student academic progress for the year and a report comparing student attendance and suspensions before entrance to the program and this year. KEY FINDINGS 1. The number of individuals completing each of the evaluation surveys were: Student Survey - 8 Parent Survey - 10 Staff Survey - 3 Administrative Survey - 3 2. 100% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with the Application Process. 3. Only 50% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with the Restroom Facilities. 4. 100% of the students were satisfied or very satisfied with the Student Services offered. 5. Students regarded their Interactions with College Personnel as very favorable. 6. The Instructional Program received high marks from the students. 7. 100% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with Staff/Student Interactions/Communications. 8. 100% of the students were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the Meals Provided by LRSD. 9. 62.5% of the students were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied by the Meals in the Student Center. 10. 100% of the students were satisfied or very satisfied with the Overall Program. 11. With the exception of the survey item dealing with Meals Provided by LRSD, all of the parent responses were either satisfied or very satisfied. 12. The Staff Survey reflected complete satisfaction with the program. 13. LRSD school administrators were also highly complimentary of the program. 14. Lyceum students showed an 85% reduction in school absences, and a 30% reduction in the number of suspensions, when compared to their pre-Lyceum assignments. 15. Lyceum students recorded the following average grade level increases over the course of this school year: Language Arts - 6.48 Math- 3.71 Reading-5 Valid PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM STUDENT SURVEY 1999 - 2000 GRADE Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 9.00 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 10.00 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Gender Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Male 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Female 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Race Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent African American 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Caucasian 2 25.0 28.6 85.7 Other 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Age Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 14.00 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 15.00 3 37.5 37.5 50.0 16.00 2 25.0 25.0 75.0 17.00 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 School attended prior to the Lyceum Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 8.00 1 12.5 16.7 16.7 725.00 5 62.5 83.3 100.0 Total 6 75.0 100.0 Missing System 2 25.0 Total 8 100.0 Written Application Fonns Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 85.7 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Personal Interview Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 37 .5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Notification of Acceptance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 4 50 .0 57.1 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Classrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Restrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 50.0 Dissatisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 . 42.9 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 85.7 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Media Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 28.6 28.6 Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 85.7 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Computer Lab Access Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 7 87.5 87.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 62.5 Dissatisfied 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 4 50 .0 50.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25 .0 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Faculty Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Support Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50 .0 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Security Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 ~00.0 100.0 Administration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Classroom Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Instructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Textbooks Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Computer-aided Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 English Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Math Instruction Cumulative FreQuencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Science Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Social Studies Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Communications Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisf:ed 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Personal Academic Success Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12..5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Individual Attention to Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Number of Courses Available Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Group Work Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Projects Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 75.0 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Grading Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Field Trips Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Homework Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 7 87.5 87.5 87.5 Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Responds in a Caring and Helpful Manner Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Provides Nurturance and Support to Students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Has High Expectations for My Academic Success Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Has High Expectations for My Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 15.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 My Teacher Respect Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 so.a 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatsified 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Support Staff Respect Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Meals Provided by LRSD Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Very Dissatisfied 7 87.5 87.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Meals in Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 37.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 50.0 Very Dissatisfied 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrivals A.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrivals P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Safety Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum Program to a friend? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 7 87.5 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 If the Lyceum Program is available to you for the 2000-01 school year, what are your plans? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Continued Enrollment 6 75.0 85.7 85. 7 Undecided 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 What are your plans after graduation from high school? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Enroll in Four 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Year College Enroll in Two 1 12.5 14.3 71.4 Year College. Undecided 2 25.0 28.6 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM PARENT SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Gender Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Male 1 10.0 10.0 1-0.0 Female 9 90.0 90.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Race Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid African-America 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Caucasian 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 School Last Attended Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 1.00 1 10.0 12.5 12.5 8.00 2 20.0 25.0 37.5 725.00 5 so.a 62.5 100.0 Total 8 80.0 100.0 Missing System 2 20.0 Total 10 100.0 Relationship to Student Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Parent 10 100.0 100.0 100.0 My Child's Grade Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 9.00 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 10.00 4 - 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Student Referral Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 90.0 22.00 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Written Application Forms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Personal Interview Cumulative Freauency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Notification of Acceptance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 - Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 6 60.0 66.7 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Freauency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 44.4 Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 22.2 22.2 Satisfied 7 70.0 77.8 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 55.6 Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Faculty Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Support Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 55.6 Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Security Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 6 60.0 66.7 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Administration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 22.2 22.2 Satisfied 7 70.0 77.8 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Classroom Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Instructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 50.0 62.5 100.0 Total 8 80.0 100.0 Missing System 2 20.0 Total 10 100.0 Textbooks Cumulative FreQuency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Computer-aided Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 English Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Math Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Science Instruction Cumulative Freouencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Social Studies Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Communications Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Your Child's Personal Academic Progress Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Individual Attention to Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Number of Courses Available Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Group Work Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Classroom Environment Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Grading Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Field Trips Cumulative .Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Homework Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Parent/Teacher Conferences Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Responsiveness of Teachers to Student Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Nurturance and Support Provided students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied . 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Staff Respects Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Staff Responds in a Caring and Helpful Manner Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Meals Provided by LRSD Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 10.0 10.0 10.0 Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 30.0 Dissatisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Very Dissatisfied 2 20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Meals in Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 90.0 Very Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival A.M. Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 2 20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 ( Bus Safety Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Have you volunteered at school this year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 No 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Do you wish for your son/daughter to return to the Lyceum ALE Program for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 7 70.0 70.0 70.0 No 3 30.0 30.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum ALE Program to others? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 9 90.0 90.0 90.0 No 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied - 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Valid Valid Valid Missing Total Valid Valid Valid , PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD ~ YCEUM STAFF SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Student Selection Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Curriculum Offered Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Expected Outcomes Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 100.0 100.0 System 2 66.7 3 100.0 Selection of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Qualifications of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Teaching Perfonnance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Relationships with College Personnel Cumulative FFequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Preparation/Planning Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 l ' Support in Instructional Delivery Cumulative Freouency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 lntructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Program Evaluation Design Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Professional Evaluation Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33 .3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Expectations for Student Behavior Cumulative Freouencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Management of Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Support for Disciplinary Actions Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Administration of Food Service Program Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatsified 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Delivery of LRSD Prepared Meals Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Very Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Distribution of LRSD Prepared Meals Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Service of Lyceum Students in the Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival Times A.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival Times P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 From Ale Administrator Cumulative (_ Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From LRSD Administrator Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Lyceum Advisory Committee Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Parent/Staff Interactions Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Parent Involvement Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Parental Support Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Summer Teacher Training Cumulative Frequencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Behavior Management Training Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Ongoing Staff Development Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Plato Training Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Classrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Dissatisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Library Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Computer Lab Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Janitorial Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Comfortability Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Do you recommend that the Lyceum Program continue for the 2000-01 school year? Cwnulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Do you recommend that the Lyceum Program expand to another grade level for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Do you wish to return to the Lyceum Program for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 . ,, . Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM ADMINISTRATIVE SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Student Referral Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Opportunities for Acceleration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Student Parent Contact Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Selection of Students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Cuniculum Offered Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Verv Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Expected Outcomes Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Verv Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Selection of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Qualifications of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Relationships with Program Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Expectations for Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Management of Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From ALE Administrator Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent . Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From LRSD Administrator Cumulative Freouency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Student/Parent Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Computer Assisted Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent ( Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Instructional Methodology Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum Program to other students? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Davi1, John 3110/00 9 .33 9 56 Davis, Lrt,ona 11/11W9 10 2.2 10.57 Lacy, Aneuah 6/24199 9 2.2 9 56 LanOI, aulanll 6/24199 9 3 8.11 Lockhart, Ray 812 1911 8 2 . 7.57 Mayfield, Branlaha 2122/00 10 7.1 11 McCoy, Nicole 8124199 9 28 7.85 Parl\u0026lt;\u0026amp;1, April 6/2.WS 10 2.8 11 Simpson, Palrlcl\u0026lt; 6/2 1911 9 2.2 g Simpson, Shelly 812m 10 2.2 9 . 4 Slanlay, JamH 6/2,wg 9 H 911 Vian,, Rataal 6/2.WS 9 2 6 79 Program Evaluation Philander Smith College/LRSD Lyceum Academic Report 5.22 B.37 7.36 6.11 5.17 39 5.35 64 7 . 2 7 . 2 6.71 8.79 1999 - 2000 Plato Fastrack Assessment Pre/Post 6.5 7.87 5.6 9.5 2.56 8,75 52 6 83 2 56 3.83 6 57 825 5.6 8.21 57 10.22 9.25 5.7 917 5 2 76 Bl Compiled - 4128/00 1.37 3.8 7.18 3.73 1.28 2.86 2.71 . 52 4 25 3.47 5 37 . 85 9.2 . 35 2.73 10 7.27 2.73 9.2 6.47 2 38 8.93 6.56 2.09 2 08 0 45 10 55 3.7 7.8 4.1 7.4 10.77 3.37 7.67 10. 1 2 . 7 3.6 10.82 7.22 3.7 10.23 6.53 2.09 6.07 5 86 Davis, John 9 3/10/00 Davis, L one 10 11/10/99 Lac , Aneesah 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 Ma , Brenisha 10 2/22/00 Mc Nicole 9 8/24/99 Par ii 10 8/24/99 Sim atrick 9 8/24/99 Sim hell 10 9/2/99 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 '-- Program Evaluation Philander Smith College/LRSD Lyceum Attendance \u0026amp; Sanctions 14 3 -11 9 1 -8 35 3 -32 29 13 -16 6 0 -6 45 5 -40 14 3 -11 51 24 -27 68 2 -66 43 7 -36 33 4 -29 97 5 -92\n,,} ..... Compiled- 4/28/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 +1 1 I 0 0 1 +1 0 0 0 I 0 -1 1 0 -1 I l 0 5 2 -3 \" .~, '\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1512","title":"Testing: Stanford Achievement Test, comparative data, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2000-09/2001-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School integration","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Testing: Stanford Achievement Test, comparative data, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1512"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["158 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1190","title":"Little Rock School District (LRSD) Assessment Notebook, Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2000-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","Students","Education--Standards"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District (LRSD) Assessment Notebook, Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1190"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["214 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\ns\np.~ ~nnln,gr B~~q, :, L,_. ft.n d,.~y ijlU at i On \\A,M9 lL .\\.iAP.O TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 July 26, 2001 Board of Education ?~l-1-6( eflu_J)N'l}. -~ fxw: ~~~/ cru I ~s~ J FROM: . .) ~/\\Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent for Instruction THROUGH: Dr. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to the Assessment Program The Board of Education approved the current assessment program in August 1999. Attached for the Board's information is a matrix that outlines the tests administered in 2000-01, dates, grade levels, and definitions. In addition to the tests listed on the matrix, we also have others, such as the Language Assessment Scale used to identify limited-English proficient students\ndiagnostic and screening tests used to . identify students for special education\nthe ASVAB at the high school to identify vocational aptitudes\nAdvanced Placement tests for students in grades 10-12\nthe SAT in grades 11-12 who need it for college admission or scholarships\ncredit by examination at the end of the year for credit recovery\nplacement examinations for entry or re-entry of home schooled students\ntests that teachers administer as a part of their instructional program\nand so forth. After many discussions evaluating this program during 2000-01, including feedback from parents, students, principals, teachers, counselors, and curriculum and assessment staff, we have determined the need to revise the program. We request the Board's approval of the following amendments to our program: 1. Eliminate the fall administration of the Achievement Level Tests (AL Ts) in reading, language, mathematics, and science for grades 3-11-except for students new to the District. Rationale: We learn very little valuable information from the fall scores that we do not already know from the spring scores received a few months earlier. Eliminating these tests would save considerable staff time at both the District and school levels-in planning, administering the tests, scanning the answer documents, running reports, distributing reports, interpreting and analyzing the reports, etc. We would save money in licensing fees, scan sheets, delivery costs of materials to and from schools, paper to Board of Education - Memo July 26, 2001 Page Two run the reports for students/parents, schools, and central office, etc. Perhaps most importantly, we would save at least a week of instructional time for virtually all students since schools tend to shut down instruction when any grade level is being tested. By continuing to test in the fall the new students to the District, we would then have diagnostic information for all students, and we would be able to have necessary data for SAIPs (Student Academic Improvement Plans) and to compute a growth score for all students. 2. Eliminate all AL Ts in grades 10-11 at the high school level. Rationale: Using the AL Ts at the high school level in any meaningful way has presented several problems. Perhaps the one that is most important is that high school students have few courses in common at any grade level since many of them repeat courses, take advantage of choices they have (e.g., taking either Algebra II or Statistics to satisfy graduation requirements), and/or intentionally delay some courses (e.g., a science or social studies course) in order to take Career Focus courses or electives in which they have interests. In other words, the grades 10-11 AL Ts are not necessarily aligned with the courses that the students are taking. It is, therefore, difficult to interpret the scores since we are not always clear about which courses the students have actually completed. Another high school issue is that they already take so many other tests, and the AL Ts are so unimportant to them that they lack motivation to do well. Students take both the SA T9 and PLAN in grade 10, and almost all of them take either the end-of-course Algebra I or Geometry test required by the state. In grade 11 by the time they receive their ALT scores, they have already taken all the required state endof- course/level tests, their last SAT9, PLAN, the PSAT, and, perhaps, either the ACT or SAT. The grade 10-11 ALT scores, therefore, are not going to be significantly informative to anyone. 3. Eliminate the mathematics and science AL Ts at grade 9 (leaving only the reading and language AL Ts at this grade level). Rationale: Again, the issue is alignment. Once students start taking Algebra I the mathematics ALT is not helpful. The ALT science test at grade 9 is not well aligned with Active Physics and Physics I Pre-AP at this grade level either since so few students in the nation even take a physics course. We can make the case with the National Science Foundation that our criterion-referenced tests (CRTs) for mathematics and science are better measurements for program evaluation and the diagnosis of individual student needs than the AL Ts. Board of Education - Memo July 26, 2001 Page Three 4. Eliminate the mathematics ALT for students in grades 7-8 who are enrolled in Algebra I or higher-level mathematics. Rationale: The ALT is not a good test for students after they begin Algebra I. 5. Eliminate the criterion-referenced tests in English language arts administered at the end of the second and third quarters, grades 3-8. (The CRTs used at the end of mathematics modules in grades 3-8 and the end-of-unit tests used in grades 3-8 in science will continue since they are an important part of the evaluation plan submitted to the National Science Foundation.) Rationale: Staff at both the District and school levels have recommended that the energy and money spent on the current CRTs in language arts would be better used in providing quality professional development for teachers in how to write their own assessments and how to use rubrics (scoring guides) in assessing student performance. The data gathered from language arts CRTs have not been helpful at the . District or school levels in assessing program effectiveness since the instruction in this area is highly individualized. The content (what students read, as opposed to skills emphasized) and sequence of lessons also varies from classroom to classroom. The value of the assessment results is at the teacher level\nthe assessment instrument, therefore, will likely be of higher value if designed by the teachers, particularly if they have been trained. Other issues in the language arts is the cost in time of scoring openended responses and the related delay in getting results back to the schools. 6. Begin the grade 9 Civics/United States History assessment in spring 2002. Rationale: The SA T9 battery includes a social studies assessment in grades 5, 7, and 10, but these tests are not necessarily aligned with the Arkansas curriculum frameworks for social studies, nor the District's grade-level and course benchmarks. The social studies staff recommend that we add this assessment so that we measure students' understanding of key concepts in United States government, civics, and history. This test can also prepare students to take the up-coming State end-of-course test in United States History, as well as provide the school and the District with diagnostic information in this subject area and evaluation data for the program. Our initial plans were to begin this assessment in spring 2001 . We made a decision to delay it due to the illness of the Director of Social Studies and due to a need to align our item bank with other important social studies assessments, such as the assessment used by the National Assessment of Educational Progress. BAL/adg Attachments I I I I i l District Assessments: The Assessment Program for 2000-01 Grade TEST K I 1 2 LRSD Observallo11 Survey Sepl. \u0026amp; Sepl. \u0026amp; Sep!. \u0026amp; bohoviorAI obss,vstion of lllmcr skms April April April LRSD Achi0ver11enl Level Tes! (ALT) Rssdt,rg, LsnguafJ Arts, Alef/o, \u0026amp; Scislfco I LRSD 1st O\\lerler CRT, October 1 LRSD 2nd Quarter CRT, Januarv LRSD Jrd Quarter CRT, March End or Module - Malh End of Uni! - Science End or Level Social Sludle~ Tesl April 3 4 5 I 6 7 8 Sepl \u0026amp; Aorll Seo! \u0026amp; Aorll Seol \u0026amp; Aoril Seol.\u0026amp; Aoril Sep! \u0026amp; April Seol \u0026amp; Aorll Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Language Language Language Language Language Langtia_ge Ms Arts Aris Aris Aris Aris Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Language Language Language Language Language Language Aris Aris.: Arts Aris Aris .Aris As Modules are As Modules are tis Modu'.es are As Modules As Modules /Is Modules compleled compleled corppl11led are compleled are compleled are compleled As Units are As Unlls aro \" AsUnll'iare NJ Unll:s are As Unlls an, completed compleled COOlpluled compleled co111pleled 9 Seo! \u0026amp; Aorll Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geomelry, Trigmiomelrv Algeb1 a 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, T rlgonornelrv May 10 Sep! \u0026amp; April Sep! \u0026amp; April Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, I Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geon1elry, Geomelry, Trlgonomelrv Trigonometry Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Algebra t \u0026amp; 2, Geomelry, Geomelry, Triaonomelrv Trigonometry 12 Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geornelry, Trigonometry Algeb1a l \u0026amp; 2,1 Geometry, . , Trlaonomelr-v \\~~l .. 'll:.11%\nate?~Elr.J... ~ IUllttr. ~--~- .Uti(WJ.\n.~FH~.ni'\":m\"'~JI ~'.J!li.:r~~~,:t:_~..,l ~ .- f:~ .S!f:. ~nn1jfr7-$. =~Jl.l:!: . ... ,,f!ii::,11' i.:S::::l:::a:::le::..:B=-e=n:::c::l.::.1m:.:a=:r:::k::..:: ::M.::,iO::.:r..:\u0026amp;:...:L::::::ra=cr_....:..._ _- l------l---~1-------1-------+---'A-'\\o\"-r'-ll-'._+-~---1--.c....A,p:'- ri'-l -+-----1----,-A\n-p_ri_l -1--~--- , :2(1 - ....~\n~r' . End or Course Algebra_ I May May Mav Mav Mav May End or Course Geomeltv Mav May Mav May Mav End or Course Lileracv Mav '-~,.... lf(i'~\"\"Ji.llj:r~f:\n(\u0026gt;\n...., .~'.'\"''~ 'i111i-'. ~a1i1):\\1'J,.\":P.1~'l\n.:\"ilj._, ,,_ ' l-t-\\: ' , - ' .' $A T-9: Nomr Rfsrencsd ToI Seplember Seplember Seplember PLAN Oct \u0026amp; Nov EXPLORE Oct - FelJ. PSAT NAEP lrandomlv selecled schools 1 February February Ocl (plaGIIGB} .October February 7118/00 Revised DRAFT 1. t I I - Glossary of Terms LRSD Observation Survey is an assessment instrument developed by Marie Clay to assess K-2 students in letter identification, word identification, concepts about print (CAPS)\nwriting vocabulary, and dictation. The Developmental Reading Assessment is also used-as part of this assessment. LRSD Achievement Level Tests (AL Ts) are tests consisting of multiple levels. 111e ALT measures student progress in mastering the skills of Mathematics, Reading, Language, and Science. The District administers the ALT to students in grades 2-11. LllSD Crileria referenced test are administered in math, science, social studies and language arts to measure student progress in mastering the district's curriculum. End-of -Course Algebra )/Geometry are *criterion-Teferenced state assessments administered to eligible students** at the end of course to measure application of core knowledge and skills in the content areas. End-of-Comse Literacy is a criterion-referenced state assessment administered to eleventh grade studenls to measure application of core knowledge and skills in the content area. State Benchmark E:ums are criterion-referenced assessments designed to measure how well students are learning the state's academic standards in Mathematics and Literacy (reading and writing). The Primary, Intennediate, and Middle Level Benc~ark Exams are administered to students in grade~ 4, 6, and 8, respectively. Stanford Achievement Test Ninth Edition (SAT 9) is a norm-referenced assessment designed to test broad concepts in specific subject areas. Nomi-referenced tests are initially administered lo a national sample of students in order to develop testing \"norms\" or normative results thal will be used in comparing local stndenl performance. As such, norm-referenced testing fostrument9 provide important information on how students in Arkansas perform when compared to nnlional sample group results. The state mandates norm-referenced testing of students in grades 5, 7, and JO. PLAN academic tests are designed to measure student attainment of the knowledge and skills acquired through the early years of high school, specifically among tenth giade students in the fall term. There are four PLAN academic tests: English, Mathematics, Reading and Science Reasoning. PLAN is the second part of the ACT assessment program. EXPLORE serves as the first step in an integrated series of American College Test (ACn assessment programs designed to enhance eighth grade students' preparation for careers, vocational training, or higher education. EXPLORE is made up primarily of four academic achievement tests: English, Mathematics, Reading, and Science Reasoning. Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) assesses knowledge and skills developed through years of study in a wide range of courses as well as through experiences outside the class1oom. The PSAT measures critical reading skills, verbal reasoning, math problem-solving skills, and writing skills. Juniors take the test to prepare for college admission tests. Test results provide valuable feedback about academic skills and can be used to identify students for honors classes. This is the qualifying test for the National Merit Program. National Assessment of Educnlional Progress (NAEP) is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what st11dents in the United Stales know and can do in various academic subjects. NAEP is authorized by Congress and directed by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). The NAEP assessments are administered to rep1esentative samples of students at the national and state levels in grades 4, 8, and 12. *Criterion rcrerenced examinulions are based on the A1kansas Cu1Ticulum Framewo1ks and designed to measure student accomplishment of the conlent standai ds therein. ** All students who llave completed the course of study. District Assessments: The Assessment Program for 2000-01 Grade K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LRSD Observation Survey Sept. \u0026amp; Sept. \u0026amp; Sept. \u0026amp; behavioral obse,vstion of literacy skiffs April April April LRSD Achievement Level Test (ALT) Reading, Language Arls, Math, \u0026amp; Science April Sept \u0026amp; April Sept \u0026amp; April Sept \u0026amp; April Sept \u0026amp; April Sept \u0026amp; April Sept \u0026amp; April LRSD 1st Quarter CRT. October Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Language Language Language Language Language Language LRSD 2nd Quarter CRT, January Arts Arts Arts Arts Arts Arts Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Reading \u0026amp; Language Language Language Language Language Language LRSD 3rd Quarter CRT, March Arts Arts Arts Arts Arts Arts As Modules are As Modules are As Modules are As Modules As Modules As Modules End of Module - Math compleled compleled completed are completed are completed are completed As Units are As Units are As Units are As Units are As Units are End of Unit - Science completed completed completed completed completed End of Level Social Studies Test State Benchmark: Math \u0026amp; Literacy April April April End of Course Algebra I May May End of Course Geometry May End of Course Literacy SAT-9: Norm Referenced Test September September PLAN EXPLORE Oct - Feb PSAT NAEP (randomly selected schools) February February 7/18/00 Revised DRAFT 9 Sept \u0026amp; April Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry May May 10 Sept \u0026amp;April Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometrv May May September Oct \u0026amp; Nov 11 Sept \u0026amp;April Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometrv Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry May May Oct (practice) .. October 12 Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry Algebra 1 \u0026amp; 2, Geometry, Trigonometry - -:-, ~ ,- ... :1-'' \u0026gt; May May February SAS Co EN-S ING, ASSESSMENT,~ PROGRAM Arkansas Department of Education Ray Simon, Director June 1999 Revised June 2000 INTRODUCTION The Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP), a comprehensive system encompassing high academic standards, professional development, student assessment, and accountability for schools and students, has the following purposes: To improve student learning and classroom instruction\n To provide public accountability by establishing expected achievement levels and reporting on student achievement\n To provide program evaluation data\nand To assist policymakers in decision-making. Based on principles of rigor, clarity, and fairness, ACTAAP makes student achievement of the academic standards the shared priority of all public schools, school districts, education service cooperatives, and the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE). It will result in improved teaching and learning. It will identify successful schools and programs and encourage replication of those successes. It will encourage individual schools and school districts to reflect on their practices, take corrective actions, and receive support from state agencies. Finally, it will fulfill the requirements of various Arkansas statutes, including Act 999 of 1999, which mandates \"that all students in the public schools of this state demonstrate grade-level academic proficiency through the application of knowledge and skills in the core academic subjects consistent with state curriculum frameworks, performance standards, and assessments.\" ACADEMIC STANDARDS The first component, a set of clear, challenging academic standards, defines what students should know and be able to do in the basic academic core. Arkansas' academic standards are delineated in ten state curriculum framework documents. Written by Arkansas classroom teachers, the curriculum frameworks are revised on a State Board of Education adopted schedule to ensure that state learning expectations will prepare students to succeed in increasingly more demanding post secondary education and in an ever more competitive job market. As part of Smart Start and Smart Step, and as a support and supplement to the curriculum frameworks, K-8 Benchmark documents in Language Arts and Mathematics have been created. These documents are examples of how a school district might implement the curriculum frameworks by grade level. The K-8 Curriculum Model documents also contain suggested instructional strategies, classroom assessments, and a K-3 grade-level skills checklist. Other supportive curriculum documents built around the academic standards are under development. 2 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The second component, professional development, is a coordinated set of planned, research-based best practice, learning activities for teachers and administrators which are standards-based and continuous. It shall be tied with school improvement planning and with licensure renewal requirements. Thirty approved professional development hours annually will be required for each certified employee in the school district. Beginning in January 2002, thirty approved professional development hours annually over a five-year period shall be required to renew a teacher or administrator license. To be eligible, professional development activities must produce teaching and administrative knowledge and skills designed to improve students' academic performance. Such activities may include approved conferences, workshops, institutes, individual learning, mentoring, peer coaching, study groups, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification, distance learning, internships, and college/university coursework. Approved professional development activities shall relate to the twelve areas adopted by the State Board of Education: content (Grades K-12)\ninstructional strategies\nassessment\nadvocacy/leadership\nsystemic change process\nstandards, frameworks, and curriculum alignment\nsupervision\nmentoring/coaching\ninstructional technology\nprinciples of learning/developmental stages\ncognitive research\nand building a collaborative learning community. All approved professional development activities, whether individual or school wide, shall be based on the improvement of student achievement on statemandated criterion-referenced examinations and other related indicators as defined by ACTAAP . 3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT The third component is a student assessment program, which includes both criterionreferenced and norm-referenced tests in the academic core. Criterion-referenced tests are customized around the academic standards in the Arkansas Curriculum Frameworks and are developed by committees of Arkansas teachers. These criterion-referenced tests are administered to establish the level of student achievement of the state academic standards and to compare the level of student achievement with the expected performance levels set by the State Board of Education. 1 orm-referenced tests provide information to compare the performance of Arkansas students against the performance of a sample of students from across the country (norming/standardization group). Because norm-referenced tests are not built exclusively around Arkansas' academic standards and because their purpose is to group students based on their performance relative to the norming group, they can best be used for assisting in broad program evaluation and in individual student diagnosis. Norm-referenced test data will not be a primary statemandated indicator within the accountability component, but will be reported annually on the School Performance Report. State-Mandated Assessments The results of all assessments should be used during the school improvement planning process to help the school focus on the Arkansas academic standards and the need to increase proficient student performance around those standards. State-mandated assessments shall be as follows: Assessments Grade Level Month Administered Criterion-Referenced Primary Benchmark Grade 4 April Intermediate Benchmark Grade 6 April Middle Level Benchmark Grade 8 April End-of-Course - Algebra I When Completed January/May End-of-Course - Geometry When Completed January/May End-of-Course - Literacv Grade 11 Januarv/Aoril Norm-Referenced Grades 5 7 and 1 O Seotember The Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams, as well as the End-ofCourse Exams, will be given late in the school year to allow maximum instructional time for covering the academic standards. Special provisions will be made for an alternate administration in January for those secondary students on a block scheduling system. The Literacy End-of-Course Exam will be given to students in Grade 11 to allow time for additional remediation, at the school's option, before graduation. These exams are tailored to Arkansas' curriculum standards, and their performance levels are absolute and held constant over time. The results of the End-of-Course Exams shall become a part of each student's transcript or permanent record. 4 An academic improvement plan means a plan which details supplemental and/or intervention and .~remedial instruction in deficient academic areas. One shall be developed for each student not performing at the proficient level in every portion of the criterion-referenced examinations. The norm-referenced tests will be given in early fall of the school year in order to provide teachers with immediate and initial performance assessment data on students currently enrolled or newly enrolled in classes and content areas. The performance of Arkansas students taking the norm-referenced tests in the fall will be compared to the performance of a norming group who took the same tests during the same period in the fall, thus ensuring the reliability, validity and fairness of comparison. Score reports will be returned early in the school year for classroom teachers to use the testing information to address the individual student learning needs, and to modify the instructional program, teaching strategies, and/or classroom assessments as needed. Instruction then can focus fully on the Arkansas academic standards throughout the year and on increasing proficient student performance around those standards. Schools may request a waiver from the fall to a spring testing date. Such waivers will only be granted after a written plan is presented to the ADE and the school agrees to the guidelines as established. The timing of such requests must also fall within the deadlines as established by the testing company. As another part of the student assessment program for Grades K-4, schools shall select performance assessments or screening/diagnostic tools to assess primary grade students. Any student in Grades K-4 failing to perform at the proficient level in reading and writing literacy or mathematics shall be evaluated as early as possible within each of the Grades K-4 academic years. Those students shall be evaluated by personnel with expertise in reading and writing literacy or mathematics who shall develop and implement an academic improvement plan, using ADE sanctioned early intervention strategies for Grades K-1 students and remediation strategies for Grades 2-4 students. These strategies should assist the students in achieving the expected standard. Schools serving Grades 5-12 shall establish a plan to assess whether children are performing at the proficient level in order to help assure eventual success on every portion of the Intermediate, Middle Level, and End-of-Course Benchmark Exams. For accountability purposes, no points will be assigned for the results of these performance assessments or screening/diagnostic tools. Act 855 of 1999 mandates that students in Grades K-3 not performing at grade level during the regular school year shall participate in an ADE approved remediation program or a summer school remediation program to be eligible for promotion to the next grade. Those schools electing not to offer a summer school program shall offer an ADE approved remediation program during the regular school year to students in Grades K-3 not performing at grade level. 5 Optional Assessments There are other assessments which are optional for student and school participation. These include the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), college entrance examinations (e.g., ACT and SAT), Advanced Placement testing, PLAN, EXPLORE, and others. Some of these may be included as indicators on the School Performance Report or in the annual school report to the public. ote: Although AEP is optional for individual school districts, state participation is mandated by Act 999 of 1999 . 6 ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS '\",,I,. . Accountability is a comprehensive, focused process designed to improve student learning. It is a shared responsibility of the state, school, district, public officials, educators, parents, and students. The ACTAAP accountability model focuses on each individual school and is constructed around a three-tiered system that includes statewide indicators, individual school improvement indicators, and a locally-generated school accountability narrative. Once appropriate time has elapsed to evaluate trends and improvement expectations in a sufficient number of indicators and a statistically-defensible point assignment system can be developed, points for each of the statewide and individual school improvement indicators will be given. This point system will form the basis for rewards and sanctions. These three tiers allow for meaningful and appropriate state and local involvement to implement accountability within clearly articulated parameters. ACTAAP encourages proactive corrections by individual schools and their local districts through the development and application of strategies using the school improvement process as a planning instrument. Performance Levels The primary goal of the accountability system is to assure that all students achieve grade-level performance. In this system, grade-level performance is defined as performing at the proficient or advanced level on state-mandated criterion-referenced tests. Four performance levels have been established for these exams: advanced, proficient, basic and below basic. The only tests for which scaled scores defining these levels have been set are the Primary Benchmark and Middle Level Benchmark Exams. Similar scales will be established by the State Board of Education as additional tests are completed and data become available. Definitions of Performance Levels Advanced students demonstrate superior performance well beyond proficient grade-level performance. They can apply Arkansas' established reading, writing, and mathematics skills to solve complex problems and complete demanding tasks on their own. They can make insightful connections between abstract and concrete ideas and provide wellsupported explanations and arguments. Proficient students demonstrate solid academic performance for the grade tested and are well-prepared for the next level of schooling. They can use Arkansas' established reading, writing, and mathematics skills and knowledge to solve problems and complete tasks on their own. Students can tie ideas together and explain the ways their ideas are connected. 7 Basic students demonstrate a need for some additional assistance, commitment, or study to reach the proficient level. They show substantial skills in reading, writing, and mathematics\nhowever, they only partially demonstrate the abilities to apply these skills. Below Basic students fail to show sufficient mastering of skills in reading, writing, and mathematics to attain the basic level. Performance Levels for the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Examinations Performance Scaled Score Ranges for Scaled Score Ranges for Level Performance Levels for Performance Levels for Literacy Mathematics Primary Middle Level Primary Middle Level Advanced 250 and above 250 and above 250 and above 250 and above Proficient 200-249 200-249 200-249 200-249 Basic 155-199 149-199 179-199 164-199 Below Basic 154 and below 148 and below 178 and below 163 and below c Performance is subject to adjustment on a periodic basis due to .statistical scaling and variability in the test.) 8 Public Reporting Each public school in Arkansas will have a School Performance Report that will be created through the combined efforts of the local school, school district, and the ADE. The School Performance Report will provide parents and the public with data upon which to evaluate their schools and provide benchmarks for measuring school improvement. Although results from the school's performance on the three-tiered system will be the primary focus of the School Performance Report, other indicators may be included as determined by law or State Board of Education rules and regulations. Although the same standards of student performance will be expected from all students, assessment data will be analyzed and reported separately for three student classifications: special education, limited English proficient, and high mobility. The purposes for tracking performance of these student groups are to focus on narrowing any achievement gap between them and their peers and to ensure that the progress of all student populations is annually and systematically monitored. For purposes of this reporting, the following definitions apply: Disaggregated Reporting General population students are those participating in the mandatory criterionreferenced and norm-referenced assessments that are not classified as special education, limited English proficient, or highly mobile. Combined population students include all those participating in the mandatory criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments regardless of classification . Special education students are those determined to be eligible for special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and who have an individualized education program (IEP). The student's IEP must stipulate that the student may participate in the mandatory criterionreferenced and norm-referenced assessments either with or without accommodations. Beginning July 1, 2000, those unable to participate with or without accommodations will be assessed through the Alternate Assessment program. Beginning with the kindergarten class of 2000-2001, the scores of all students classified as special education students participating in the mandatory criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments with or without accommodations shall be aggregated ( combined) with those of the general population students according to the following calendar: 2004 - 05 Primary Benchmark 2005 - 06 Fifth Grade orm-Referenced 2006 - 07 Intermediate Benchmark 2007 - 08 Seventh Grade Norm-Referenced 2008 - 09 Middle Level Benchmark 2008 - 09 End of Course (where applicable) 2010- 11 Tenth Grade Norm-Referenced 2011 - 12 End of Course Literacy 9 Limited,. English proficient students are those having a language background other than English and whose proficiency in English is such that the probability of academic success in an English-only classroom is below that of native English language students. The district's Language Assessment Committee must have determined that the students may participate in the mandatory criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments either with or without accommodations. Beginning July 1, 2000, those unable to participate with or without accommodations will be assessed through the Alternate Assessment program. High mobility students are those who, at the time of spring testing, were not enrolled in the current school district on October 1 of the current school year or who, at the time of fall testing, were not enrolled in the current school district on October I of the previous school year. Beginning with the 1999-2000 mandatory assessments, results will be reported separately for the following categories of students: General Population Special Education Students Limited English Proficient Students High Mobility Students Combined Population Beginning with the 2000-01 mandatory assessments, the number of students not tested through either the mandatory criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments or Alternate Assessment program will be reported by school. Schools should make every effort to assure that all students are tested. Annual School Report to the Public: Each year, each school will prepare a report to the parents and community. This report will include a narrative description (such as prepared under Tier III indicators) that will highlight the school's improvement plan and indicate progress made in implementing the performance indicators within that plan. Arkansas School Information Site (AS-IS): The ADE plans to make school accountability data available statewide through the Department's World Wide Web - as-is.org. This Web site will display school data based on student performance and other selected indicators. Annual ADE Report to the Legislature: The ADE shall report to the members of the House and Senate Interim Committees on Education on the progress of ACTAAP. The report shall be due on September!, 1999 and annually thereafter. 10 School Improvement Planning As part of the state's accreditation process, each school is required to engage in the development and implementation of a school improvement plan based on priorities indicated by student assessment and other pertinent data. This plan is designed to ensure that all students demonstrate proficiency on all portions of the state-mandated criterionreferenced exams. The initial step in the planning model is a structured process that leads to disaggregation of student achievement and other student data. The study of this data helps schools identify areas within the curriculum where student performance does not meet expectation. Schools prioritize the needs areas, then develop performance-based benchmarks that can be tracked during the implementation phase of the plan. Schools then identify intervention and remediation strategies that, if effectively implemented, will move students toward meeting the established benchmarks. Finally, schools develop an action plan that assigns tasks, identifies resources (including the source of funds), and projects evaluation strategies that will signal movement toward meeting the performance standards. The process requires that the intervention and remediation be research-based and linked to proven practices. Rewards Rewards will be based on a system structured to recognize schools that demonstrate and maintain high performance over time and to recognize schools that demonstrate growth on both the state-mandated and school-selected indicators. Rewards also can be used to highlight individual schools so that their practices can be adapted in other schools and districts across the state. Each year the ADE will recognize individual schools that demonstrate exceptional performance in two categories: Performance Awards - Absolute levels of student achievement and other indicators. Growth Trend and Improvement A wards - Recognized growth trends and improvement in student achievement and other indicators. All award categories, which could include cash payments to individual schools, will be phased in over time and will be implemented as the indicator performance levels are established through the standard setting process. The focus of any cash awards must be to enhance the capability of the school to better serve its students. Awarded funds shall be used to expand programs, provide additional materials and supplies, support technology, provide bonuses to staff, or make possible other enhancements that serve the needs of the school or children. 11 Sanctions Sanctions are applied for the purpose of improving teaching and learning, not for punishing schools or the people in them. Intervention from the state is not meant to be a permanent solution to unacceptable student achievement, but a way to help local schools improve student performance. It is expected that individual schools and districts will monitor their own progress and take corrective steps to improve student achievement prior to intervention from the state. To avoid sanctions, each school is expected to achieve annually a minimum percentage of its total possible points given for the accountability indicators described within the threetiered system. Failure to do so will result in the following designations: High Priority Status - first year. Alert Status - second year. Low Performing Status - third year. Academic Distress Phase I Status - fourth year. To be considered for removal from any sanctioned designation leading up to, but not including, Academic Distress Phase I, a school must attain the minimum percentage of its total possible points for two consecutive years. Once classified as Academic Distress Phase I, a school must comply with rules and regulations to be promulgated by the ADE in order to be removed from this category. Failure to do so will result in the school's designation as Academic Distress Phase II and/or Academic Distress Phase III . The ADE reserves the right, for any school in any of the designations above, to mandate a specified intensive intervention plan which could include, but not be lin1ited to, specific one-year goals in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. This plan could also include a mandated summer school program for students perfoffiling below grade level. Current rules and regulations governing schools in Academic Distress will remain in effect until the ACTAAP system described here is fully operational. 12 Accountabilitv Indicators Definitions of the non-academic (learning environment) indicators are provided later in this document. Tier I Indicators, all state-mandated, are based on performance goals and apply to every school in the state, where appropriate, by grade level configuration. They are as follows: Indicator Goal (Definition) Grade Level(s) Performance 100% of a school's students shall perform at or 41 \", 61 \", and 81 \" on State- above the \"proficient\" level in reading and writing Mandated literacy. Criterion- Referenced 100% of a school's students shall perform at or Tests above the \"proficient\" level in mathematics. Performance 100% of a school's secondary students shall on State- perform at or above the \"proficient\" level in Mandated Algebra I. Criterion- Secondary Referenced 100% of a school's secondary students shall Tests perform at or above the \"proficient\" level in Geometry. 100% of a school's secondary students shall perform at or above the \"proficient\" level in Literacy. School Drop At least 99% of secondary students will remain in 7'\" through 121 \" Out school to complete the 12th grade. Average Average daily attendance rate will be at least 95%. Kindergarten Daily through 12th Attendance Classes 100% ofa school's classes will be taught by an Kindergarten Taught by an appropriately licensed teacher. through 12th Appropriate! y Licensed Teacher Professional 100% of a school's certified staff will complete at Kindergarten Development least 30 hours of approved professional through 12th development annually. School Schools will be free of drugs, weapons, and Kindergarten Safety violent acts. through 12th Note: For purposes of assigning points for criterion-referenced tests under the Tier I accountability component, only the performance of general population students shall be measured. 13 Tier II Indicators are based on trend and improvement goals on state-mandated criterion-referenced tests and on school-selected indicators. Any \"Other School Selected .. Indicators\" must have prior approval of the ADE. Trend goals will be established for different cohorts of students using cross-sectional data from the same indicator (e.g. Primary Benchmark Exam). Statistical techniques will be developed, by averaging multiple years of data, to minimize the inherent volatility associated with the natural variation in performance of these different groups. This means that if a school is continuing to improve, the trend will be a consistent indicator that fewer students are below proficient, with the effect of \"off-year\" or \"good-year\" performance minimized. Improvement goals will be established for the same cohort of students using a longitudinal database. As students progress from grade to grade, data will be maintained and constantly updated. Tier II - State-Mandated Indicators Indicator Goal (Definition) Grade Level(s) Performance on The percent of students performing at or above 4th , 6t\\ and 8th State-Mandated the \"proficient\" level in reading and writing Criterion- literacy on the criterion-referenced tests will Referenced meet or exceed the trend and improvement Tests goals each year. -- - -- ---- -- - -- ---- -- --- -- --- - -- The percent of students performing at or above the \"proficient\" level in mathematics on the criterion-referenced tests will meet or exceed the trend and improvement goals each year. Performance on The percent of secondary students performing Secondary State-Mandated at or above the \"proficient\" level in Algebra I Criterion- will meet or exceed the trend goal each year. Referenced Tests The percent of secondary students performing at or above the \"proficient\" level in Geometry will meet or exceed the trend goal each year. The percent of secondary students performing at or above the \"proficient\" level in Literacy will meet or exceed the trend goal each year. Note: For purposes of assigning points for state-mandated criterion-referenced tests under the Tier II accountability component, the performance of each of the student categories - general population, special education students, limited English proficient students, and high mobility students - shall be measured. 14 Tier II - School-Selected Indicators (Schools select any 5) Indicator Goal Grade Level(s) School Drop Secondary schools will improve the percentage Secondary Out of students who stay in school to complete the 12th grade. Average Daily Schools will improve their average daily All Levels Attendance attendance rate. Classes Taught Schools will improve the percent of classes All Levels byan taught by an appropriately licensed teacher. Appropriately Licensed Teacher Professional Schools will increase the percent of certified All Levels Development staff who complete 60 or more hours of approved professional development annually. School Safety Schools will be free of drugs, weapons, and All Levels violent acts. Other School Schools will select trend or improvement goals All Levels Selected directed to student achievement in specific Indicators sub-populations or sub-test areas. These must have prior approval of ADE. Trend and Improvement Goals on State-Mandated Criterion-Referenced Tests On average, each school's trend goal for annual rate of reduction in the number of students below proficient will be determined by dividing the total percent of students below the proficient level by 10. To help establish improvement goals, each cohort of students will be monitored, beginning with the 1999 Primary Benchmark Exam, and a longitudinal database developed. As students progress from grade to grade, data will be maintained and constantly updated. This information will allow for the assessment of performance changes relative to initial performance and will assist in the development of expected improvement models. Test analysis and methodical planning to reach these goals will be facilitated and guided by the state school evaluation process. Trend and Improvement Goals on School-Sclcctcd Indicators The school, with approval of the ADE, selects five additional indicators to complete Tier II. These additional indicators can be selected from among school drop out, average daily attendance, teacher licensure, school safety, or professional development as defined in Tier I\nOR, a school may identify trend or improvement goals directed to student achievement in specific sub-populations or sub-test areas related to the criterion- 15 referenced or norm-referenced tests. Guidelines will be developed for use in selecting minimum numbers of students for sub-population study in order to preclude identification of individual students. In order to protect the integrity of the accountability system, the ADE must also approve the trend and improvement goals selected by the school. If a school elects to include results of its norm-referenced tests within its Tier II indicators, points will be assigned even though no points are given for these exams in Tier I. Note: The Professional Development indicator is set at a minimum level of 60 hours in order to encourage schools to offer more than the state-required minimum of 30 hours. Thus, schools will be rewarded for encouraging additional professional development opportunities for its teachers and administrators. Once selected, Tier II indicators will remain until they have been substantially attained or alternate indicators approved by the ADE. The following are examples of indicators based on sub-populations: The gap between the scale score in mathematics on the Primary Benchmark Exam for African-American students and white students will be decreased by 10% each year. Title I eligible students will improve 5 percentile points in reading comprehension each year on the fifth grade norm-referenced test. Voluntary Reporting of Off-Grade Data The ADE strongly encourages, and will provide assistance toward, voluntary implementation by local schools of an expansion of the process of measuring improvement goals by utilizing data for a longitudinal study of students' performance on off-grade tests. Participating schools may include results from off-grade testing as Tier II indicators, if so desired. Tier III Indicators Tier III is a narrative developed by the staff of each school. This annual narrative of approximately 500 words generally describes data sources ( e.g., criterion-referenced tests, norm-referenced tests, etc.) used to address state and local performance indicators. The narrative also describes progress that the school has made in formulating the plan and in successfully implementing the trend and performance indicators within the school improvement process. This narrative, which shall be sent to the ADE during the spring of each year, will be incorporated in the School Performance Report that will be disseminated to the public. No points will be assigned for the narrative. 16 Sample School Narrative For the last three years, scores on the Primary Benchmark Exam's reading test have exceeded the district's average. Each child from kindergarten through fifth grade receives an hour and a half of developmental reading instruction per day. Emphasis is also placed on the implementation of activities as outlined in the School Improvement Plan. Independent reading of books by primary and intermediate grade level students has been a priority - a goal was set for each student. This year 85% of the fourth grade students met or exceeded their goal compared to 70% last year. Students are being taught writing skills using many different approaches including computer word processing. The writing and scoring process is designed to help students improve writing scores on the Benchmark Exams. The computer-student ratio is 1:4. Children have access to the Internet and the school has a homepage on the Web. In mathematics over the past five years, fifth grade students scored below the district goal of 50% above the national average on the SAT-9. This year, a staff focus group supported by a Title I supplemental grant, recommended a teacher accountability math pacing chart. It included chapter test scores, a consistent five-day math homework policy, in-service for staff and parents, a student test awareness program, homework room and a Math Intervention Assistance program. All recommendations were implemented with the approval of the school council. In May, an in-service continued to provide staff with training on computer software and accessing the Internet for mathematical teaching materials and techniques. Parent involvement (via parent-teacher conferences) increased by 40% this year. Parents participated in developing instructional materials for use at home to reinforce skills, learning instructional uses of the computer, donated time to serve as individual tutors for students during the school day and assisted with holiday events for the students. Definitions of Non-Academic (Learning Environment) Indicators School Dropout means the percentage of students who leave school for any of the following reasons as defined in the Statewide Information System (SIS) database: incarcerated, failing grades, suspended or expelled, lack of interest, conflict with school, economic hardship, pregnancy/marriage, peer conflict, Jack of attendance, alcohol/drugs, other. A code will be used for GED participation but will not count as a dropout for ACT AAP purposes. A student will be considered a dropout for the previous year if he/she has a Dropout/Withdrawal date between October 1 of the previous school year and October 1 of the current school year and has not re-entered. The percentage completing will be calculated by dividing the number not dropping out by the previous year's October 1 enrollment. Average Daily Attendance means the total number of days attended by students divided by the number of days actually taught by the school. The number includes those students who attend school outside of the resident district on a tuition agreement between the two respective districts. 17 Appropriately Licensed Teacher means that a teacher has the appropriate license and/or approval to teach., the respective class. The teacher is teaching a class that would not .cause the school to have a citation in the accreditation process. For the purpose of this calculation, the teacher would fill one of the job assignments as defined in the SIS database. (These are instructional positions, not administrative or supervisory job classifications.) The percentage of classes taught by an appropriately licensed teacher will be determined by dividing the number of classes taught by appropriately licensed teachers by the total number of classes taught. Professional Development is as defined in the component definition earlier. School Safety means a percentage safety index determined by dividing the number of violent incidences involving students by the current year three-quarter average daily membership of the school and subtracting from 100%. A safety infraction committed by a student includes any of the following as defined in the SIS database: drugs, alcohol, student assault, staff assault, knife, handgun, rifle, shotgun, explosive, club, and gang. Schools reporting user-defined infractions should request confirmation from the ADE as to their inclusion in this indicator. Each reported incident will be factored into the calculation\ntherefore, there is no difference between one student being reported four times and four students being reported once . 18 Calendar for Data Collection and Point Assignment Svstem -~ .,\n-~ _..,.~ Since the determination of rewards and sanctions will be based on points assigned to the Tier I and Tier II indicators, it is extremely important that such a system be fair and statistically and legally defensible. It is also necessary to allow appropriate tin1e for sufficient data to be gathered that will permit an accurate measurement of trends and improvement expectations in a sufficient number of indicators. Once the assignment of points is initiated, the ADE, through a contract with the University of Arkansas' Office of Research, Measurement and Evaluation (ORME), will be responsible for all calculations and rankings. The local school should not need additional personnel or resources to respond to the requirements of ACTAAP. The following calendar outlines the Baseline Year, or the first year in which official data for each Tier I indicator will be collected. 1998- 99 1999 - 00 2000- 01 2001 - 02 Primary Benchmark Middle Level Benchmark School Dropout Average Daily Attendance Classes Taught by an Appropriately Licensed Teacher Professional Development School Safety None Intermediate Benchmark End-of-Course Algebra I End-of-Course Geometry End-of-Course Literacy The Baseline Year for trend goals with each Tier II indicator will be two years following that indicator's introduction in Tier I. The Baseline Year for improvement goals will vary, depending on when the same cohort of students reaches the next appropriate, measurable indicator. Even though baseline data accumulation was begun with the 1998-99 year, actual points for rewards and sanctions will not be assigned until 2001-02, and then only for those indicators for which sufficient data has been gathered. The complete accountability point system will become fully operational, with all indicators, in 2003-04. Note: In order to meet federal mandates, a temporary system will be developed to identify those schools designated for school improvement. Beginning in 2000-2001 and continuing until the ACTAAP accountability system is fully operational, a school will be designated in school improvement under the following condition: Seventy-five percent or more of the students perform below proficient on either the literacy (reading and writing) or the mathematics section of the Benchmark Exam for the designated grade or grades represented by the school. 19 Observation Survey DRA Kindergarten Results by Middle School Feeder Pattern Percent Readiness--LRSD Average: 72% Basel 51 King .64 Bale 59 Brady Gibbs 89 Chicot 56 Badgett 22 Bal Chicot 56 Mitch 91 Brady 77 Dodd 87 Willia 89 Dodd 87 F.Park 68 Frank Clover 56 Right 92 Fair P. 56 McDer 95 Booker 81 Mabelv 61 Jeff 90 Geye~ 85 Wakef 47 Steph 41 F.Park 68 Romie 67 Carver 81 Meado 77 King 64 Mead6 77 Watson 56 -Wash 81 Frank 64 Terry 92 Otter 90 PH 83 Stepb 41 Woodr 69 Fulb 95 W.Hills 15 Rocke 76 Wakef 47 McDer 95 Wilson 67 Wash 81 W.Hilis 75 Steph 41 Woodr 69 Wilson 67 DRA Grade 1 Results by Middle School Feeder Pattern Percent Readiness-LRSD Average: 54 % CMS DMMS FHMS HMS Mann MMS PHMS SMS Basel 30 King 57 Bale 67 Brady 35 Gibbs 66 Chicot 27 Badgett 06 Bale 67 Chicot 27 Mitch 25 Brady 35 Dodd 58 Willia 84 Dodd 58 F.Park 70 Frank 58 Clover 28 Right 36 Fair P. 63 McDer 80 Booker 69 Mabelv 51 Jeff 69 Geyer 47 Wakef 22 Steph 24 F.Park 70 Romine 60 Carver 76 Meado 70 King 57 Meado 70 Watson 25 Wash 36 Frank 58 Terry 47 ' Otter 68 PH 50 Steph 24 Woodr 84 Fulb 61 W.Hills 81 Rocke 76 Wakef 22 ~ McDer 80 Wilson 83 Wash 36 W.Hills 81 - - Steph 24 Woodr 84 Wilson 83 CMS DMMS Basel 47 King 81 - Chicot 39 Mitch 49 Clover 58 Right 95 Wakef 40 Steph 31 ., Watson 54 Wash 63 Woodr 78 ,- DRA Grade 2 Results by Middle School Feeder Pattern Percent Readiness-LRSD Average: 68% FHMS HMS Mann MMS Bale 72 Brady 71 Gibbs 81 Chicot 39 Brady 71 Dodd 52 Willia 90 Dodd 52 Fair P. 63 Mci\u0026gt;er 67 . Booker 80 M\nabelv 43 F.Park 90 Romine 69 . Carver 82 Meado 58 Frank 81 Terry 81 Ofter 87 Fulb 79 W.Hills 90 McDer 67 Wilson 60 - Steph 31 PHMS SMS Badgett 12 Bale 72 F.Park 90 Frank( \u0026lt; 81 Jeff 71 Geyer 73 King 81 Meado 58 PH 45 St~ph '. 3'1 Rocke 71 Wakef. -40 Wash 63 W.llills 90 Woodr 78 Wilson 60 6/15/00 Districtwide Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.06 N 246 White Male Mean 2.53 N 227 Total Mean 2.81 N 473 Female Mean 1.16 N 593 Black Male Mean 0.89 N 613 Total Mean 1.02 N 1206 Female Mean 1.90 N 68 other Male Mean 2.00 N 52 Total Mean 1.94 N 120 Female Mean 1.73 N 907 Total Male Mean 1.37 N 892 Total Mean 1.55 N 1799 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - Districtwide by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 8,20 +5.14 7.52 26.36 +18.84 245 240 246 6.35 +3.82 6.35 24.48 +18.13 227 222 225 7.31 6.96 25.46 +18.50 472 +4.51 462 471 3.76 +2.60 4.81 18.30 +13.48 605 613 634 2.61 +1.72 3.65 14.43 +10.79 625 573 584 3.18 +2.16 4.25 16.44 +12.20 1230 1186 1218 5.93 +4.03 5.94 16.67 +10.73 70 49 57 5.77 +3.77 6.12 22.78 +16.66 52 50 51 5.86 +3.92 6.03 19.56 +13.53 122 99 108 5.11 +3.38 5.59 20.31 +14.72 920 902 937 3.73 +2.36 4.50 17.56 +13.05 904 845 860 4.43 +2.88 5.07 18.99 +13.93 1824 1747 1797 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment ,, Chanae 25.79 36.77 +10.98 231 226 24.57 36.29 +11.72 231 233 25.18 36.53 I +11.35 462 459 19.68 29.48 +9.80 601 605 16.05 26.44 +10.39 604 604 17.86 27.96 +10.10 1205 1209 19.59 29.49 +9.89 37 45 22.38 29.68 +7.30 55 62 21 .26 29.60 +8.34 92 107 21 .30 31.36 +10.06 869 876 18.66 29.22 +10.56 890 899 19.96 30.27 ,, +10.31 1759 1775 * An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient In first grade. Sagments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. \"** An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. OS2000-Camlna K_/hn,_2 6119100 Districtwide Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.06 N 246 White Male Mean 2.53 N 227 Total Mean 2.81 N 473 Female Mean 1.16 N 593 Black Male Mean 0.89 N 613 Total Mean 1.02 N 1206 Female Mean 1.90 N 68 Other Male Mean 2.00 N 52 Total Mean 1.94 N 120 Female Mean 1.73 N 907 Total Male Mean 1.37 N 892 Total Mean 1.55 N 1799 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chancie Assessment Assessment Chancie 8.20 +5.14 7.52 26.36 +18.84 245 240 246 6.35 +3.82 6.35 24.48 +18.13 227 222 225 7.31 +4.51 6.96 25.46 +18.50 472 462 471 3.76 +2.60 4.81 18.30 +13.48 605 613 634 2.61 +1.72 3.65 14.43 +10.79 625 573 584 3.18 +2.16 4.25 16.45 +12.20 1230 1186 1218 5.93 +4.03 5.94 16.67 +10.73 70 49 57 5.77 +3.77 6.12 22.78 +16.66 52 50 51 5.86 +3.92 6.03 19.56 +13.53 122 99 108 5.11 +3.38 5.59 20.31 +14.72 920 902 937 3.73 +2.36 4.50 17.56 +13.05 904 845 860 4.43 +2.88 5.07 19.00 +13.93 1824 1747 1797 Second Grade Fall ***Spring A,nount of Assessment Assessment Chancie 25.79 36.77 +10.98 231 226 24.57 36.29 +11.72 231 233 25.18 36.53 +11.35 462 459 19.68 29.48 +9.80 601 605 16.05 26.44 +10.39 604 604 17.86 27.96 +10.10 1205 1209 19.59 29.49 +9.89 37 45 22.38 29.68 +7.30 55 62 21.26 29.60 +8.34 92 107 21.30 31.36 +10.06 869 876 18.66 29.22 +10.56 890 899 19.96 30.27 +10.31 1759 1775 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high!!ghted in bold. ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2oootables 6/19100 Badgett Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.00 N 3 White Male Mean N Total Mean 3.00 N 3 Female Mean 0.38 N 16 Black Male Mean 0.43 N 14 Total Mean 0.40 N 30 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.79 N 19 Total Male Mean 0.43 N 14 Total Mean 0.64 N 33 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 3.33 +0.33 2.00 3 1 3.33 +0.33 2.00 3 1 1.13 +0.75 1.56 6.93 +5.38 16 18 15 0.92 +0.49 1.00 5.22 +4.22 12 9 9 1.04 +0.64 1.37 6.29 +4.92 28 27 24 ' I :, 1.47 +0.68 1.58 6.93 +5.35 19 19 15 0.92 +0.49 1.00 5.22 +4.22 12 9 9 1.26 +0.62 1.39 6.29 +4.90 31 28 24 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 8.00 40.00 +32.00 1 1 1.00 1.00 0 1 1 , 4.50 20.50 +16.00 2 2 1.44 3.00 +1.56 9 8 1.95 10.55 +8.60 19 20 1.79 8.39 +6.61 28 28 2.10 7.11 +5.01 10 9 1.90 10.10 +8.20 20 21 1.97 9.20 +7.23 30 30 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of /he population no/ testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school ZOOOlables 6/19/00 Bale Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.50 N 2 White Male Mean 0.00 N 2 Total Mean 0.25 N 4 Female Mean 2.19 N 21 Black Male Mean 0.13 N 15 Total Mean 1.33 N 36 Female Mean 0.80 N 5 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 1 Total Mean 0.67 N 6 Female Mean 1.82 N 28 Total Male Mean 0.11 N 18 Total Mean 1.15 N 46 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 3.50 +3.00 8.40 25.57 +17.17 2 5 7 1.00 +1.00 4.00 14.00 +10.00 2 2 2 2.25 +2.00 7.14 23.00 +15.86 4 7 9 5.77 +3.58 9.13 22.53 +13.40 22 15 15 0.60 +0.47 9.25 21.33 +12.08 15 12 12 3.68 +2.34 9.19 22.00 +12.81 37 27 27 4.20 +3.40 1.50 8.00 +6.50 5 2 2 2.00 +2.00 6.75 20.00 +13.25 1 4 5 3.83 5.00 16.57 I +3.17 +11.57 6 6 7 5.34 +3.52 8.27 22.21 +13.94 29 22 24 0.72 +0.61 8.11 20.21 +12.10 18 18 19 3.57 +2.42 8.20 21.33 +13.13 47 40 43 \"' Second Grade ~ Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 18.50 33.50 +15.00 4 4 20.00 44.00 +24.00 2 2 19.00 37.00 +18.00 6 6 15.69 25.53 +9.84 16 17 14.93 28.00 +13.07 15 17 15.32 26.76 +11.44 31 34 C .... 16.25 27.05 +10.80 20 21 ~ 15.53 29.68 +14.15 17 19 15.92 28.30 +12.38 37 40 An average level of 2 or more Is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Elfa by school 2000tables 5119100 Little Rock School District Baseline Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.00 N 2 White Male Mean 0.50 N 2 Total Mean 0.75 N 4 Female Mean 0.37 N 19 Black Male Mean 0.13 N 16 Total Mean 0.26 N 35 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.43 N 21 Total Male Mean 0.17 N 18 Total Mean 0.31 N 39 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanc:ie Assessment Assessment Chanc:ie 3.00 +2.00 2 3.00 +2.50 3.00 27.00 +24.00 2 4 2 3.00 +2.25 3.00 27.00 +24.00 4 4 2 1.89 +1.53 4.90 18.33 +13.43 19 20 18 1.43 +1 .30 2.91 9.10 +6.18 14 23 21 1.70 +1.44 3.84 13.36 +9.52 33 43 39 4.00 .. 1 4.00 ' 1 2.00 +1.57 4.90 18.33 +13.43 21 ' 20 18 1.63 +1.46 2.96 10.65 +7.69 16 28 23 1.84 +1.53 3.77 14.02 +10.25 37 48 41 Second Grade ~ Fall ***Spring ~rnount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 20.67 31.33 +10,67 3 3 16.00 20.00 +4.00 2 2 18.80 26.80 +8.00 5 5 16.83 24.69 +7.86 12 13 15.77 23.00 +7.23 13 13 16.28 23.85 +7.57 25 26 38.00 44.00 +6.00 1 1 38.00 44.00 +6.00 1 1 18.88 27.00 +8.13 16 17 15.80 22.60 +6.80 15 15 17.39 24.94 +7.55 31 32 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high!:ghted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ha by school 2000tables 6/19/00 Booker Grade Gender Fall Race Assessment Female Mean 2.12 N 17 White Male Mean 1.42 N 12 Total Mean 1.83 N 29 Female Mean 1.58 N 19 Black Male Mean 1.76 N 21 Total Mean 1.68 N 40 Female Mean 4.00 N 3 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 2 Total Mean 2.40 N 5 Female Mean 2.00 N 39 Total Male Mean 1.54 N 35 Total Mean 1.78 N 74 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Charn:1e 6.06 +3.94 6.61 24.83 +18.22 17 23 23 2.83 +1.42 4.92 23.25 +18.33 12 12 12 4.72 ' +2.90 6.03 24.29 +18.26 29 35 35 3.95 +2.37 3.71 19.05 +15.33 19 21 21 4.10 +2.33 2.43 16.38 +13.95 21 23 21 4.03 +2.35 3.05 17.71 +14.67 40 44 42 11.67 +7.67 2.75 21.00 +18.25 3 4 4 1.00 +1.00 2 7.40 +5.00 2.75 21.00 +18.25 5 4 4 5.46 +3.46 502 21.98 +16.96 39 - 48 48 3.49 +1.94 3.29 18.88 +15.59 35 35 33 4.53 +2.74 4.29 20.72 +16.43 74 83 81 Second Grade\n. Fall ***Spring A)'nount of Assessment Assessment Change 29.33 37.42 +8.08 24 24 25.12 31.88 +6.76 17 16 27.59 35.20 +7.61 41 40 22.36 32.64 +10.28 25 25 16.78 27.67 +10.89 18 18 20.02 30.56 +10.53 43 43 24.00 30.00 +6.00 2 2 44.00 44.00 0 1 1 30.67 34.67 +4.00 3 3 25.71 34.78 +9.08 51 51 21.47 30.06 +8.58 36 35 23.95 32.86 +8.91 87 86 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are hig~'.ighted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6/19/00 Brady Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.00 N 5 White Male Mean 0.67 N 3 Total Mean 0.88 N 8 Female Mean 0.89 N 9 Black Male Mean 0.53 N 17 Total Mean 0.65 N 26 Female Mean 0.67 N 3 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 0.67 N 3 Female Mean 0.88 N 17 Total Male Mean 0.55 N 20 Total Mean 0.70 N 37 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment ChanC1e Assessment Assessment - Chanae 5.40 +4.40 8.00 14.29 +6.29 5 7 7 4.00 +3.33 8.00 20.00 +12.00 2 3 3 5.00 +4.13 8.00 16.00 +8.00 7 10 10 3.86 +2.97 5.47 12.44 +6.97 7 17 16 3.50 +2.97 5.24 13.00 +7.76 16 21 19 3.61 +2.95 5.34 12.74 +7.40 23 38 35 2.50 +1.83 5.50 13.50 +8.00 2 4 4 6.00 14.33 +8.33 3 3 2.50 +1.83 5.71 13.86 +8.14 2 7 7 4.21 +3.33 6.11 13.07 +6.97 14 28 27 3.56 +3.01 5.63 14.00 +8.37 18 27 25 3.84 +3.14 5.87 13.52 +7.65 32 55 52 Second Grade .,. Fall *\"**Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment ChanC1e 18.00 29.33 +11.33 3 3 18.00 30.00 +12.00 1 1 18.00 29.50 +11.50 4 4 19.13 29.29 +10.16 16 14 17.74 26.00 +8.26 23 21 18.31 27.31 +9.01 39 35 16.00 28.00 +12.00 1 1 16.00 28.00 +12.00 1 1 18.95 29.29 +10.35 19 17 17.68 26.26 +8.58 25 23 18.23 27.55 +9.32 44 40 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing al a proficient level are high(ighled in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 Carver Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 8.38 N 13 White Male Mean 8.00 N 18 Total Mean 8.16 N 31 Female Mean 4.05 N 19 Black Male Mean 1.50 N 20 Total Mean 2.74 N 39 Female Mean 2.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 9.25 N 4 Total Mean 7.80 N 5 Female Mean 5.70 N 33 Total Male Mean 5.02 N 42 Total Mean 5.32 N 75 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment ChanQe Assessment Assessment ChanQe 11.46 +3.08 8.57 28.00 +19.43 13 7 7 11.83 +3.83 6.35 26.10 +19.75 18 20 20 11.68 +3.52 6.93 26.59 +19.67 31 27 27 5.95 +1.89 4.87 20.87 +16.00 19 15 15 3.20 +1.70 2.79 16.95 +14.16 20 19 19 4.54 +1.79 3.71 18.68 +14.97 39 34 34 4.00 +2.00 8.00 30.00 +22.00 1 1 1 12.50 +3.25 4.67 31.33 +26.67 4 3 3 10.80 +3.00 5.50 31.00 +25.50 5 4 4 8.06 ' +2.36 6.13 23.43 +17.30 33 23 23 7.79 +2.76 4.62 22.33 +17.71 42 -- 42 42 7.91 +2.59 5.15 22.72 +17.57 75 65 65 Second Grade ' Fall ***Spring A(Tlount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 24.83 40.50 +15.67 12 12 26.10 38.63 +12.53 20 19 25.63 39.35 +13.73 32 31 19.29 31 .85 +12.57 28 27 17.44 31.00 +13.56 18 18 18.57 31.51 +12.95 46 45 16.00 32.00 +16.00 2 2 25.50 36.00 +10.50 4 4 22.33 34.67 +12,33 6 6 20.71 34.39 +13.68 42 41 22.33 35.02 +12.69 42 41 21.52 34.71 +13.18 84 82 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 Little Rock School District Chicot Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 4 White Male Mean 4.29 N 7 Total Mean 2.73 N 11 Female Mean 0.64 N 25 Black Male Mean 0.41 N 22 Total Mean 0.53 N 47 Female Mean 0.57 N 7 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 7 Total Mean 0.29 N 14 Female Mean 0.56 N 36 Total Male Mean 1.08 N 36 Total Mean 0.82 N 72 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Change 1.75 +1.75 1.75 16.75 +15.00 4 4 4 4.29 0 1.00 10.17 +9.17 7 5 6 3.36 +0.64 1.33 12.80 +11.47 11 9 10 2.35 +1.71 1.88 14.52 +12.65 26 24 23 1.39 +0.98 1.75 7.91 +6.16 23 20 22 1.90 +1.37 1.82 11 .29 +9.47 49 44 45 1.57 +1.00 2.00 13.11 +11.11 7 3 9 0.86 +0.86 1.00 2.60 +1.60 7 4 5 1.21 +0.93 1.43 9.36 +7.93 14 7 14 2.14 +1.58 1.87 14.42 +12.55 37 31 36 1.84 +0.75 1.52 7.52 +6.00 37 29 33 1.99 +1.17 1.70 11.12 +9.42 74 60 69 Second Grade ,. Fall ***Spring A,nount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 19.00 37.00 +18.00 2 2 17.00 31.00 +14.00 2 2 18.00 34.00 +16.00 4 4 16.05 26.35 +10.30 21 20 11.57 25.26 +13.70 23 19 13.70 25.82 +12.12 44 39 6.40 5 16.00 17.33 +1.33 2 9 16.00 13.43 -2.57 2 14 16.30 23.44 +7.14 23 27 12.30 23.27 +10.97 27 30 14.14 23.35 +9.21 50 57 An average level of 2 or more Is considered proficient m kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient m second grade. EJfa by school 2000tables 6119/00 Cloverdale Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.00 N 1 White Male Mean 0.00 N 2 Total Mean 0.33 N 3 Female Mean 0.52 N 23 Black Male Mean 0.17 N 23 Total Mean 0.35 N 46 Female Mean 0.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 2 Mean 0.00 Total N 3 Female Mean 0.52 N 25 Total Male Mean 0.15 N 27 Total Mean 0.33 N 52 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 4.00 +3.00 1 6.00 +6.00 4.00 8.00 +4.00 2 1 1 5.33 +5.00 4.00 8.00 +4.00 3 1 1 2.05 +1.53 7.00 13.68 +6.68 21 29 28 1.48 +1.30 4.83 10.10 +5.27 23 29 30 1.75 +1.40 5.91 11.83 +5.91 44 58 58 2.00 +2.00 3.00 6.00 +3.00 1 1 1 1.00 +1.00 6.50 20.25 +13.75 2 4 4 1.33 5.80 17.40 . +1.33 +11.60 3 5 5 2.13 +1.61 6.87 13.41 +6.55 23 30 29 1.78 +1.63 5.00 11.20 +6.20 27 34 35 1.94 +1.61 5.88 12.20 +6.33 50 64 64 Second Grade ' ' Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 29.00 20.00 -9.00 2 1 3.00 4.00 +1.00 1 1 20.33 12.00 -8.33 3 2 27.52 31 .30 +3.79 27 23 26.75 25.68 -1.07 24 19 27.16 28.76 +1.61 51 42 - 44.00 44.00 0 1 1 44.00 44.00 0 1 1 27.62 30.83 +3.21 29 24 26.50 25.52 -0.98 26 21 27.09 28.36 +1.26 55 45 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. \" An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high(ghted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tab/es 5119100 Little Rock School District Dodd Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.64 N 11 White Male Mean 0.50 N 8 Total Mean 0.58 N 19 Female Mean 1.00 N 9 Black Male Mean 0.25 N 8 Total Mean 0.65 N 17 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.80 N 20 Total Male Mean 0.38 N 16 Total Mean 0.61 N 36 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Change 6.80 +6.16 1.33 16.67 +15.33 10 3 3 4.89 +4.39 11.00 23.00 +12.00 9 4 4 5.89 +5.32 6.86 20.29 +13.43 19 7 7 10.67 +9.67 2.14 19.29 +17.14 9 7 7 2.75 +2.50 3.00 19.43 +16.43 8 7 7 6.94 +6.29 2.57 19.36 +16.79 17 14 14 18.00 30.00 +12.00 1 1 18.00 30.00 +12.00 1 1 8.63 +7.83 3.36 19.55 +16.18 19 11 11 3.88 +3.51 5.91 20.73 +14.82 17 11 11 6.39 +5.78 4.64 20.14 +15.50 36 22 22 Second Grade Fall ***Spring AfllOUnt of Assessment Assessment ChanQe 10.00 25.20 +15.20 5 5 10.00 25.20 +15.20 5 5 25.00 16.25 -8.75 6 8 15.25 28.50 +13.25 4 4 21 .10 20.33 -0.77 10 12 14.00 1 14.00 1 25.00 16.25 -8.75 6 8 12.50 26.67 +14.17 10 .9 17.19 21 .76 +4.58 . 16 17 An average level of 2 or more 1s considered proficient m kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high(ighted in bold. \" An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Etta by school 2000tables 6119/00 Little Rock School District Fair Park Grade Gender Fall Race Assessment Female Mean 2.12 N 17 White Male Mean 1.42 N 12 Total Mean 1.83 N 29 Female Mean 1.58 N 19 Black Male Mean 1.76 N 21 Total Mean 1.68 N 40 Female Mean 4.00 N 3 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 2 Total Mean 2.40 N 5 Female Mean 2.00 N 39 Total Male Mean 1.54 N 35 Total Mean 1.78 N 74 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Change 6.06 +3.94 6.61 24.83 +18.22 17 23 23 2.83 +1.42 4.92 23.25 +18.33 12 12 12 4.72 +2.90 6.03 24.29 +18.26 29 35 35 3.95 +2.37 3.71 19.05 +15.33 19 21 21 4.10 +2.33 2.43 16.38 +13.95 21 23 21 4.03 +2.35 3.05 17.71 +14.67 40 44 42 11.67 +7.67 2.75 21.00 +18.25 3 4 4 1.00 +1.00 2 7.40 +5.00 2.75 21.00 +18.25 5 4 4 5.46 +3.46 5.02 21.98 +16.96 39 48 48 3.49 +1.94 3.29 18.88 +15.59 35 35 33 4.53 +2.74 4.29 20.72 +16.43 74 83 81 Second Grade ,. Fall ***Spring Ajnount of Assessment Assessment Change 29.33 37.42 +8.08 24 24 25.12 31.88 +6.76 17 16 27.59 35.20 +7.61 41 40 22.36 32.64 +10.28 25 25 16.78 27.67 +10.89 18 18 20.02 30.56 +10.53 43 43 24.00 30.00 +6.00 2 2 44.00 44.00 0 1 1 30.67 34.67 +4.00 3 3 25.71 34.78 +9.08 51 51 21.47 30.06 +8.58 36 35 23.95 32.86 +8.91 87 86 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high~ighted in bold . .. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 Little Rock School District Forest Park Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 4.55 N 11 White Male Mean 3.08 N 12 Total Mean 3.78 N 23 Female Mean 1.89 N 9 Black Male Mean 0.00 N 13 Total Mean 0.77 N 22 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 3.35 N 20 Total Male Mean 1.48 N 25 Total Mean 2.31 N 45 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Cham:ie Assessment Assessment ChanQe 8.82 +4.27 8.75 27.70 +18.95 11 20 20 7.25 +4.17 13.80 31.13 +17.33 12 15 15 8.00 +4.22 10.91 29.17 +18.26 23 35 35 3.22 +1.33 6.00 21.60 +15.60 9 5 5 0.50 +0.50 4.20 15.60 +11.40 12 10 10 1.67 +0.89 4.80 17.60 +12.80 21 15 15 6.30 +2.95 8.20 26.48 +18.28 20 25 25 3.88 +2.40 9.96 24.92 +14.96 24 25 25 4.98 +2.67 9.08 25.70 +16.62 44 50 50 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring ~mount of Assessment Assessment ChanQe 18.55 39.09 +20.55 11 11 18.29 36.29 +18.00 14 14 18.40 37.52 +19.12 25 25 18.40 34.80 +16.40 5 5 11.83 25.33 +13.50 12 12 13.76 28.12 +14.35 17 17 20.00 42.00 +22.00 2 2 20.00 42.00 +22.00 2 2 18.67 38.22 +19.56 18 18 15.31 31.23 +15.92 26 26 16.68 34.09 +17.41 44 44 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000fables 6119/00 Franklin Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 2 White Male Mean 1.00 N 1 Total Mean 0.33 N 3 Female Mean 0.43 N 23 Black Male Mean 0.15 N 41 Total Mean 0.25 N 64 Female Mean 1.50 N 2 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 1.50 N 2 Female Mean 0.48 N 27 Total Male Mean 0.17 N 42 Total Mean 0.29 N 69 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 2.00 +2.00 14.00 44.00 +30.00 2 1 1 3.00 +2.00 1 2.33 +2.00 14.00 44.00 +30.00 3 1 1 2.65 +2.22 6.23 24.38 +18.14 23 30 32 2.05 +1.90 5.96 18.82 +12.86 41 26 28 2.27 +2.02 6.11 21.78 +15.68 64 56 60 3.50 +2.00 3.00 26.00 +23.00 2 1 1 3.50 +2.00 3.00 26.00 +23.00 2 1 1 2.67 +2.19 6.38 25.00 +18.63 27 32 34 2.07 +1 .90 5.96 18.82 +12.86 42 26 28 2.30 +2.01 6.19 22.21 +16.02 69 58 62 Second Grade . Fall ... Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Change 19.15 35.35 +16.21 34 34 12.93 32.73 +19.80 30 30 16.23 34.13 +17.89 64 64 19.15 35.35 +16.21 34 34 12.93 32.73 +19.80 30 30 16.23 34.13 +17.89 64 64 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high~ighted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 5119100 Little Rock School District Fulbright Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 5.33 N 12 White Male Mean 2.70 N 23 Total Mean 3.60 N 35 Female Mean 2.25 N 4 Black Male Mean 5.31 N 13 Total Mean 4.59 N 17 Female Mean N Other Male Mean 3.00 N 1 Total Mean 3.00 N 1 Female Mean 4.56 N 16 Total Male Mean 3.62 N 37 Total Mean 3.91 N 53 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 18.67 +13.33 9.86 25.43 +15.57 12 14 14 6.91 +4.21 2.12 25.27 +23.15 22 17 15 11 .06 +7.46 5.61 25.34 +19.73 34 31 29 5.40 +3.15 2.27 15.40 +13.13 5 11 10 7.62 ' +2.31 3.18 17.64 +14.45 13 11 11 7.00 +2.41 2.73 16.57 +13.84 18 22 21 12.00 +9.00 5.00 38.00 +33.00 1 1 1 12.00 +9.00 5.00 38.00 +33.00 1 1 1 14.76 +10.20 6.52 21.25 +14.73 17 25 24 7.31 +3.68 2.62 22.63 +20.01 36 29 27 9.70 +5.79 4.43 21.98 +17.55 53 54 51 Second Grade ' Fall ***Spring Amount of ,\u0026lt; Assessment Assessment Change 34.93 40.40 +5.47 15 15 36.00 43.33 +7.33 12 12 35.41 41.70 +6.30 27 27 25.91 33.60 +7.69 11 10 34.00 36.83 +2.83 11 12 29.95 35.36 +5.41 22 22 44.00 44.00 0 2 2 44.00 44.00 0 1 1 44.00 44.00 0 3 3 32.04 38.15 +6.11 28 27 35.42 40.24 +4.82 24 25 33.60 39.15 +5.56 52 52 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. - An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Bia by school 2000ta\"'8s 6119/00 Garland Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean N White Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.69 N 16 Black Male Mean 2.29 N 28 Total Mean 1.70 N 44 Female Mean N Other Male Mean 1.00 N 1 Total Mean 1.00 N 1 Female Mean 0.69 N 16 Total Male Mean 2.24 N 29 Total Mean 1.69 N 45 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae ~ 1.47 +0.78 2.53 11.47 +8.94 17 17 17 1.41 -0.87 2.27 9.92 +7.64 29 11 12 1.43 -0.27 2.43 10.83 +8.40. 46 28 29 3.00 12.00 +9.00 1 1 0.00 -1.00 2.33 10.00 +7.67 1 3 3 0.00 .. 2.50 10.50 1 -1.00 4 4 +8.00 1.47 +0.78 2.56 11.50 +8.94 17 18 18 1.37 -0.87 2.29 9.93 +7.65 30 14 15 1.40 -0.28 2.44 10.79 +8.35 47 32 33 Second Grade . Fall ***Spring .Amount of Assessment Assessment ChanQe 2.00 1 2.00 1 13.18 17.64 +4.45 22 22 12.70 20.37 +7.67 20 19 12.95 18.90 +5.95 42 41 ,, 13.18 17.64 +4.45 22 22 12.70 19.45 +6.75 20 20 12.95 18.50 +5.55 42 42 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school zoootables 6/19100 Little Rock School District Geyer Springs Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.00 N 1 White Male Mean 5.00 N 2 Total Mean 4.33 N 3 Female Mean 0.90 N 20 Black Male Mean 0.80 N 20 Total Mean 0.85 N 40 Female Mean 0.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 1 Total Mean 0.00 N 2 Female Mean 0.95 N 22 Total Male Mean 1.13 N 23 Total Mean 1.04 N 45 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 6.00 +3.00 5.80 30.40 +24.60 1 5 5 15.00 +10.00 0.75 17.00 -f-16.25 2 4 4 12.00 +7.67 3.56 24.44 +20.89 3 9 9 2.35 +1.45 2.60 20.15 +17.55 20 20 20 2.70 +1.90 2.36 14.08 +11.72 20 14 13 2.53 +1.68 2.50 17.76 +15.26 40 34 33 2.00 +2.00 1 1.00 +1.00 1.25 11.75 +10.50 1 4 4 1.50 +1.50 1.25 11 .75 +10.50 2 4 4 2.50 +1.55 3.24 22.20 +18.96 22 25 25 3.70 +2.57 1.86 14.19 +12.33 23 22 21 3.11 +2.07 2.60 18.54 +15.95 45 47 46 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring Ajnount of Assessment Assessment Chan!'.le 20.00 37.33 +17.33 3 3 19.33 30.67 +11.33 3 3 19.67 34.00 +14.33 6 6 19.17 33.50 +14.33 12 12 14.50 25.80 +11.30 20 20 16.25 28.69 +12.44 32 32 20.00 40.00 +20.00 1 1 20.00 40.00 +20.00 1 1 19.33 34.27 +14.93 15 15 15.33 2T.00 +11.67 24 24 16.87 29.79 +12.92 39 39 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000lables 6/19100 Gibbs Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 4 White Male Mean 0.00 N 3 Total Mean 0.00 N 7 Female Mean 0.00 N 4 Black Male Mean 0.00 N 6 Total Mean 0.00 N 10 Female Mean 0.00 N 2 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 0.00 N 2 Female Mean 0.00 N 10 Total Male Mean 0.00 N 9 Total Mean 0.00 N 19 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chance Assessment Assessment Chance 6.33 +6.33 11.25 27.57 +16.32 6 4 7 10.00 +10.00 6.89 28.10 +21.21 6 9 10 8.17 +8.17 8.23 27.88 +19.65 12 13 17 5.88 +5.88 3.50 17.56 +14.06 8 6 9 4.58 +4.58 2.75 14.43 +11.68 12 8 14 5.10 +5.10 3.07 15.65 +12.58 20 14 23 8.67 +8.67 4.00 18.00 +14.00 3 1 2 24.00 1 8.67 +8.67 4.00 20.00 +16.00 3 1 3 6.53 +6.53 6.36 21.50 +15.14 17 11 18 6.39 +6.39 4.94 20.28 +15.34 18 17 25 6.46 +6.46 5.50 20.79 +15.29 35 28 43 Second Grade\nFall ***Spring\nynount of Assessment Assessment Chance 22.60 32.89 +10.29 10 9 20.89 37.56 +16.67 9 9 21.79 35.22 +13.43 19 18 13.40 28.40 +15.00 10 10 13.45 25.45 +12.00 11 11 13.43 26.86 +13.43 21 21 18.00 30.00 +12.00 1 1 18.00 30.00 +12.00 1 1 18.00 30.53 +12.53 20 19 16.86 30.86 +14.00 21 21 17.41 30.70 +13.29 41 40 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high(ghted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Elfa by school 2000tables 6/19/00 Jefferson Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 5.45 N 20 White Male Mean 4.07 N 14 Total Mean 4.88 N 34 Female Mean 2.00 N 12 Black Male Mean 1.88 N 8 Total Mean 1.95 N 20 Female Mean 8.00 N 2 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 8.00 N 2 Female Mean 4.38 N 34 Total Male Mean 3.27 N 22 Total Mean 3.95 N 56 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Chanae 12.70 +7.25 6.82 36.36 +29.55 20 11 11 11.93 +7.86 5.81 28.00 +22.19 14 21 21 12.38 +7.50 6.16 30.88 +24.72 34 32 32 4.92 +2.92 5.62 21.38 +15.77 12 13 13 3.25 +1.38 1.57 11.57 +10.00 8 7 7 4.25 +2.30 4.20 17.95 +13.75 20 20 20 24.00 +16.00 2 24.00 +16.00 2 10.62 +6.24 6.17 28.25 +22.08 34 24 24 8.77 +5.50 4.75 23.89 +19.14 22 28 28 9.89 +5.95 5.40 25.90 +20.50 56 52 52 Second Grade\n.. Fall ***Spring A)nount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 32.67 38.32 +5.65 24 19 30.38 35.90 +5.52 21 20 31.60 37.08 +5.48 45 39 22.57 25.64 +3.07 14 14 22.50 29.64 +7.14 12 11 22.54 27.40 +4.86 26 25 27.00 20.00 -7.00 2 1 27.00 20.00 -7.00 2 1 28.95 32.94 +3.99 38 33 27.49 33.25 +5.76 35 32 28.25 33.09 +4.85 73 65 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the populalion not testing at a proficienl level are high.li ghted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more ,s considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119/00 King Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.71 N 17 White Male Mean 0.36 N 14 Total Mean 1.10 N 31 Female Mean 0.76 N 25 Black Male Mean 0.55 N 20 Total Mean 0.67 N 45 Female Mean 1.50 N 4 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 3 Total Mean 0.86 N 7 Female Mean 1.17 N 46 Total Male Mean 0.43 N 37 Total Mean 0.84 N 83 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall -spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 5.71 +4.00 7.24 23.28 +16.04 17 25 25 3.38 +3.03 6.67 25.31 +18.64 13 12 13 4.70 +3.60 7.05 23.97 +16.92 30 37 38 4.19 +3.43 5.00 23.21 +18.21 26 24 24 2.29 +1.74 3.09 13.14 +10.06 21 35 35 3.34 +2.67 3.86 17.24 +13.37 47 59 59 3.67 +2.17 10.67 17.00 +6.33 6 3 4 5.00 +5.00 9.33 42.67 +33.33 3 3 3 4.11 +3.25 10.00 28.00 +18.00 9 6 7 4.65 +3.48 6.40 22.77 +16.37 49 52 53 2.89 +2.46 4.32 17.98 +13.66 37 50 51 3.90 +3.05 5.38 20.42 +15.04 86 102 104 Second Grade ' Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment chanae 21.18 40.09 +18.91 22 22 20.50 39.53 +19.03 16 17 20.89 39.85 +18.95 38 39 16.85 33.04 +16.19 26 27 13.46 33.69 +20.23 28 26 15.09 33.36 +18.27 54 53 20.00 49.50 +29.50 1 2 20.00 49.50 +29.50 1 2 18.86 36.73 +17.87 49 51 16.02 36.00 +19.98 44 43 17.52 36.39 +18.88 93 94 An average level of 2 or more Is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high(ghted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6/19/00 Mabelvale Elem Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.50 N 8 White Male Mean 2.29 N 7 Total Mean 1.87 N 15 Female Mean 0.82 N 17 Black Male Mean 0.50 N 20 Total Mean 0.65 N 37 Female Mean 0.00 N 1 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 0.00 N 1 Female Mean 1.00 N 26 Total Male Mean 0.96 N 27 Total Mean 0.98 N 53 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 6.13 +4.63 3.00 41 .00 +38.00 8 2 2 4.14 +1.86 1.17 16.17 +15.00 7 6 6 5.20 +3.33 1.63 22.38 +20.75 15 8 8 2.47 +1.65 3.45 21 .04 +17.59 17 22 24 2.05 +1.55 1.77 18.65 +16.88 20 22 23 2.24 +1 .59 2.61 19.87 +17.26 37 44 47 3.00 +3.00 1 3.00 +3.00 1 3.62 +2.62 3.42 22.58 +19.16 26 24 26 2.59 +1 .63 1.64 18.14 +16.50 27 28 29 3.09 +2.11 2.46 20.24 +17.77 53 52 55 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring AJ11ount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 11 .14 24.86 +13.71 7 7 11.00 39.00 +28.00 5 7 11 .08 31 .93 +20.85 12 14 8.23 22.15 +13.92 13 13 8.30 19.60 +11 .30 20 20 8.27 20.61 +12.33 33 33 15.00 41 .00 +26.00 2 2 15.00 41 .00 +26.00 2 2 9.77 24.73 +14.95 22 22 8.84 24.63 +15.79 25 27 9.28 24.67 +15.40 47 49 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. .. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high.l.ig hted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 McDermott Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.07 N 14 White Male Mean 0.62 N 13 Total Mean 0.85 N 27 Female Mean 0.00 N 9 Black Male Mean 0.00 N 9 Total Mean 0.00 N 18 Female Mean 0.50 N 6 Other Male Mean 1.00 N 4 Total Mean 0.70 N 10 Female Mean 0.62 N 29 Total Male Mean 0.46 N 26 Total Mean 0.55 N 55 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Chance 9.29 +8.21 3.45 21.36 +17.91 14 11 11 4.15 +3.54 8.67 31.78 +23.11 13 9 9 6.81 +5.96 5.80 26.05 +20.25 27 20 20 4.67 +4.67 2.53 23.65 +21.12 9 17 17 2.56 +2.56 2.55 21 .20 +18.65 9 11 10 3.61 +3.61 2.54 22.74 +20.21 18 28 27 5.17 +4.67 4.75 18.75 +14.00 6 4 4 10.50 +9.50 3.00 26.00 +23.00 4 2 2 7.30 ' +6.60 4.17 21.17 +17.00 10 I 6 6 7.00 +6.38 3.13 22.25 +19.13 29 32 32 4.58 +4.12 5.09 26.19 +21 .10 26 22 21 5.85 +5.31 3.93 23.81 +19.89 55 54 53 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring PiiJlount of Assessment Assessment Chance 27.00 37.20 +10.20 10 10 26.00 40.94 +14.94 17 17 26.37 39.56 +13.19 27 27 18.94 30.87 +11.93 32 31 16.06 25.62 +9.56 17 21 17.94 28.75 +10.81 49 52 12.00 30.00 +18.00 2 2 3.33 18.00 +14.67 3 3 6.80 22.80 +16.00 5 5 20.45 32.30 +11.85 44 43 19.59 31.41 +11 .82 37 41 20.06 31.87 +11.81 81 84 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highl..i ghted in bold . An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school ZOOOtables 6119100 Little Rock School District Meadowcliff Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.00 N 3 White Male Mean 0.00 N 5 Total Mean 0.38 N 8 Female Mean 2.23 N 13 Black Male Mean 0.11 N 9 Totnl Mean 1.36 N 22 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 2.00 N 16 Total Male Mean 0.07 N 14 Total Mean 1.10 N 30 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Chanae 4.00 +3.00 3.50 31.60 +28.10 3 4 5 1.75 +1.75 1.33 14.33 +13.00 4 3 3 2.71 +2.34 2.57 25.13 +22.55 7 7 8 6.57 +4.34 2.31 20.50 +18.19 14 16 16 2.22 +2.11 2.25 16.93 +14.68 9 12 14 4.87 +3.51 2.29 18.83 +16.55 23 28 30 2.00 16.00 +14.00 1 1 2.00 16.00 +14.00 1 1 6.12 +4.12 2.52 22.82 +20.29 17 21 22 2.08 +2.01 2.07 16.47 +14.40 13 15 17 4.37 +3.27 2.33 20.05 +17.72 30 36 39 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring A,nount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 16.67 24.67 +8.00 3 3 15.33 22.00 +6.67 3 3 16.00 23.33 +7.33 6 6 17.54 25.93 +8.39 13 14 13.77 22.33 +8.56 13 15 15.65 24.07 +8.42 26 29 2.00 10.00 +8.00 1 1 2.00 10.00 +8.00 1 1 17.38 25.71 +8.33 16 17 13.35 21.63 +8.28 17 19 15.30 23.56 +8.25 33 36 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are hightghted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tabJes 6119/00 Mitchell Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.00 N 1 White Male Mean N Total Mean 1.00 N 1 Female Mean 1.37 N 19 Black Male Mean 0.90 N 10 Total Mean 1.21 N 29 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 1.35 N 20 Total Male Mean 0.90 N 10 Total Mean 1.20 N 30 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall spring Amount of Assessment Cham:1e Assessment Assessment ChanQe 3.00 +2.00 0.00 1.00 +1.00 1 1 1 3.00 +2.00 0.00 1.00 +1.00 1 1 1 3.53 +2.16 3.67 12.36 +8.69 19 15 14 3.00 +2.10 6.71 13.19 +6.48 10 17 16 3.34 +2.14 5.28 12.80 +7.52 29 I 32 30 ' 3.50 +2.15 3.44 11.60 +8.16 20 16 15 3.00 +2.10 6.71 13.19 +6.48 10 17 16 3.33 +2.13 5.12 12.42 +7.30 30 33 31 Second Grade , Fall spring Amount of Assessment Assessment ChanQe 19.60 23.14 +3.54 15 14 19.82 24.82 +5.00 17 17 19.72 24.06 +4.35 32 31 40.00 44.00 +4.00 1 1 22.00 25.00 +3.00 2 2 28.00 31.33 +3.33 3 3 20.88 24.53 +3.66 16 15 20.05 24.84 +4.79 19 19 20.43 24.71 +4.28 35 34 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high/ighted in bold. 0 An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Elfa by school 2000tables 6119100 Otter Creek Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 1.52 N 21 White Male Mean 2.27 N 11 Total Mean 1.78 N 32 Female Mean 1.53 N 19 Black Male Mean 1.00 N 15 Total Mean 1.29 N 34 Female Mean 1.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 1.25 N 4 Total Mean 1.20 N 5 Female Mean 1.51 N 41 Total Male Mean 1.50 N 30 Total Mean 1.51 N 71 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Change Assessment Assessment Change 6.00 +4.48 5.12 28.56 +23.44 21 17 18 5.18 +2.91 4.54 21.50 +16.96 11 13 14 5.72 +3.94 4.87 25.47 +20.60 32 30 32 5.16 +3.63 3.21 17.80 +14.59 19 14 15 3.13 +2.13 1.55 15.18 +13.64 15 11 11 4.26 +2.97 2.48 16.69 +14.21 34 25 26 4.00 +3.00 1 1.75 +0.50 6.50 44.00 +37.50 4 2 2 2.20 +1.00 6.50 44.00 +37.50 5 2 2 5.56 +4.05 4.26 23.67 +19.41 41 31 33 3.70 +2.20 3.42 20.59 +17.17 30 26 27 4.77 +3.27 3.88 22.28 +18.41 71 57 60 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring AJllount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 26.36 31.82 +5.45 11 11 32.00 42.00 +10.00 5 7 28.13 35.78 +7.65 16 18 26.00 35.43 +9.43 6 7 11.88 25.56 +13.68 8 9 17.93 29.88 +11.95 14 16 3.00 28.00 +25.00 1 1 3.00 28.00 +25.00 1 1 26.24 33.22 +6.99 17 18 18.43 32.47 +14.04 14 17 22.71 32.86 +10.15 31 35 An average level of 2 or more ,s considered proficient in kindergarten. An everage level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by schOol 2000tables 6/19/00 Pulaski Hgts Elem Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 5.00 N 12 White Male Mean 3.60 N 5 Total Mean 4.59 N 17 Female Mean 0.67 N 15 Black Male Mean 2.71 N 7 Total Mean 1.32 N 22 Female Mean N Other Male Mean 1.00 N 1 Total Mean 1.00 N 1 Female Mean 2.59 N 27 Total Male Mean 2.92 N 13 Total Mean 2.70 N 40 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Cham:ie Assessment Assessment ChanQe 11.75 +6.75 15.13 26.00 +10.88 12 8 8 6.20 +2.60 8.56 19.50 +10.94 5 16 16 10.12 +5.53 10.75 21.67 +10.92 17 24 24 2.29 +1.62 3.00 14.70 +11.70 14 10 10 6.14 +3.43 1.58 9.67 +8.08 7 12 12 3.57 +2.25 2.23 11.95 +9.73 21 22 22 6.00 20.00 +14.00 1 1 3.00 +2.00 1 3.00 +2.00 6.00 20.00 +14.00 1 1 1 6.65 +4.06 8.26 19.74 +11.47 26 19 19 5.92 +3.00 5.57 15.29 +9.71 13 28 28 6.41 +3.71 6.66 17.09 +10.43 39 47 47 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Afnount of Assessment Assessment ChanQe 18.73 27.40 +8.67 11 10 26.86 36.00 +9.14 7 7 21.89 30.94 +9.05 18 17 14.25 24.29 +10.04 8 7 14.00 19.00 +5.00 7 8 14.13 21.47 +7.33 15 15 18.00 40.00 +22.00 1 1 18.00 40.00 +22.00 1 1 16.84 26.12 +9.28 19 17 20.27 27.75 +7.48 15 16 18.35 26.91 +8.56 34 33 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. \" An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. ' ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 5119100 Little Rock School District Rightsell Grade Gender Fall Race Assessment Female Mean 2.00 N 1 White Male Mean N Total Mean 2.00 N 1 Female Mean 2.62 N 21 Black Male Mean 2.40 N 15 Total Mean 2.53 N 36 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Mean Total N Female Mean 2.59 N 22 Total Male Mean 2.40 N 15 Total Mean 2.51 N 37 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment ChanQe Assessment Assessment Change 10.00 +8.00 1 10.00 +8.00 1 5.05 +2.43 7.35 14.70 +7.35 21 23 23 4.40 +2.00 5.81 12.93 +7.12 15 16 15 4.78 +2.25 6.72 14.00 +7.28 36 39 38 6.00 2 6.00 2 5.27 +2.68 7.24 14.70 +7.46 22 25 23 4.40 +2.00 5.81 12.93 +7.12 15 16 15 4.92 +2.41 6.68 14.00 +7.32 37 41 38 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chance 28.96 36.88 +7.92 25 25 32.36 40.83 +8.47 11 12 30.00 38.16 +8.16 36 37 . .. 28.96 36.88 +7.92 25 25 32.36 40.83 +8.47 11 12 30.00 38.16 +8.16 36 37 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average /eve/ of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119/00 Rockefeller Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.50 N 8 White Male Mean 1.83 N 6 Total Mean 2.79 N 14 Female Mean 1.00 N 23 Black Male Mean 0.40 N 20 Total Mean 0.72 N 43 Female Mean 4.75 N 4 Other Male Mean 3.33 N 3 Total Mean 4.14 N 7 Female Mean 2.00 N 35 Total Male Mean 1.00 N 29 Total Mean 1.55 N 64 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 10.50 +7.00 5.63 26.50 +20.88 8 16 16 3.67 +1.83 4.83 27.14 +22.31 6 6 7 7.57 +4.79 5.41 26.70 +21.29 14 22 23 3.30 +2.30 6.05 20.30 +14.25 23 21 20 1.90 +1.50 3.50 17.29 +13.79 20 14 14 2.65 +1.93 5.03 19.06 +14.03 43 35 34 7.25 +2.50 4.00 18.00 +14.00 4 1 1 8.67 +5.33 3 7.86 +3.71 4.00 18.00 +14.00 7 1 1 5.40 +3.40 5.82 22.92 +17.10 35 38 37 2.97 +1.97 3.90 20.57 +16.67 29 20 21 4.30 +2.75 5.16 22.07 +16.91 64 58 58 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Alnountof Assessment Assessment Chanae 44.00 44.00 0 6 6 26.75 31.75 +5.00 8 8 34.14 37.00 +2.86 14 14 18.55 24.15 +5.60 20 20 18.06 26.56 +8.50 18 18 18.32 25.29 +6.97 38 38 39.00 44.00 +5.00 2 2 39.00 44.00 +5.00 2 2 24.42 28.73 +4.31 26 26 22.04 29.29 +7.25 28 28 23.19 29.02 +5.83 54 54 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are high._ lighted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school ioootabJes 5119100 Little Rock School District Romine Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.50 N 2 White Male Mean 0.00 N 4 Total Mean 0.17 N 6 Female Mean 1.00 N 13 Black Male Mean 0.00 N 18 Total Mean 0.42 N 31 Female Mean 0.00 N 4 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 4 Total Mean 0.00 N 8 Female Mean 0.74 N 19 Total Male Mean 0.00 N 26 Total Mean 0.31 N 45 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 5.50 +5.00 2 1.40 +1.40 11.25 21.00 +9.75 5 4 4 2.57 +2.40 11.25 21.00 +9.75 7 4 4 3.44 +2.44 11.43 19.74 +8.30 16 23 23 3.09 +3.09 7.36 14.09 +6.73 22 11 11 3.24 +2.82 10.12 17.91 +7.79 38 34 34 1.50 +1.50 5.25 9.50 +4.25 4 4 4 1.75 +1.75 6.67 27.00 +20.33 4 3 2 1.63 +1.63 5.86 15.33 +9.48 8 7 6 3.27 +2.54 10.52 18.22 +7.70 22 27 27 2.65 +2.65 8.11 17.24 +9.12 31 18 17 2.91 +2.59 9.56 17.84 +8.29 53 ' 45 44 Second Grade a Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 44.00 44.00 0 2 2 37.33 44.00 +6.67 3 2 40.00 44.00 +4.00 5 4 31.20 37.88 +6.68 15 16 23.75 30.78 +7.03 24 23 26.62 33.69 +7.08 39 39 23.71 31.71 +8.00 7 7 27.09 36.00 +8.91 11 10 25.78 34.24 +8.46 18 17 30.08 36.64 +6.56 24 25 25.79 33.03 +7.24 38 35 27.45 34.53 +7.08 62 60 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000fables 6119/00 Little Rock School District Terry Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.88 N 25 White Male Mean 4.50 N 18 Total Mean 4.14 N 43 Female Mean 2.24 N 17 Black Male Mean 1.39 N 23 Total Mean 1.75 N 40 Female Mean 1.80 N 5 Other Male Mean 6.50 N 4 Total Mean 3.89 N 9 Female Mean 3.06 N 47 Total Male Mean 3.09 N 45 Total Mean 3.08 N 92 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Cham1e Assessment Assessment Chanqe 7,80 +3.92 5.07 26,86 +21.79 25 14 14 10.67 +6.17 3.92 22.94 +19.01 18 13 16 9.00 +4.86 4.52 24.77 +20.25 43 27 30 6.35 +4.12 3.10 15.30 +12.20 17 20 20 4.91 +3.52 0.95 7.76 +6,81 23 20 21 5.53 +3.78 2.03 11.44 +9.41 40 40 41 5.00 +3.20 0.00 4.00 +4.00 5 1 1 19.00 +12.50 11.33 36,00 +24.67 4 3 3 11.22 +7,33 8.50 28.00 +19.50 9 4 4 6.98 +3.91 3.80 19.60 +15.80 47 35 35 8.47 +5.38 2.89 15.95 +13.06 45 36 40 7.71 +4,63 3.34 17,65 +14.32 92 71 75 Second Grade - Fall ***Spring A,mountof Assessment Assessment Chanqe 20.63 37,64 +17.01 8 11 20.81 30.82 +10.01 16 17 20,75 33,50 +12.75 24 28 24.15 37.20 +13.05 13 20 16.12 28.45 +12.34 17 22 19.60 32,62 +13.02 30 42 15.50 38.40 +22.90 4 5 22.50 29.43 +6,93 4 7 19.00 33,17 +14.17 8 12 21.64 37.50 +15.86 25 36 18.84 29.48 +10.64 37 46 19.97 33.00 +13,03 62 82 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by Schoof 2000tables 6119/00 Wakefield Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Mean Female N White Mean 0.00 Male N 2 Total Mean 0.00 N 2 Female Mean 0.33 N 21 Black Male Mean 0.09 N 22 Total Mean 0.21 N 43 Female Mean 0.00 N 4 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 3 Total Mean 0.00 N 7 Female Mean 0.28 N 25 Total Male Mean 0.07 N 27 Total Mean 0.17 N 52 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae . 0.00 10.00 1 1 +10.00 0.00 . 1.00 2.00 0 +1.00 2 1 1 0.00 0 0.50 6.00 +5.50 2 2 2 1.86 +1 .52 1.59 12.91 +11 .32 21 17 34 0.95 +0.86 1.29 9.74 +8.45 22 17 23 1.40 +1.19 1.44 11.63 +10.19 43 34 57 1.00 +1 .00 0.75 10.83 +10.08 4 4 6 1.00 +1 .00 3 1.00 +1.00 0.75 10.83 +10.08 7 4 6 1.72 +1.44 1.36 12.54 +11 .17 25 22 41 0.89 +0.81 1.28 9.42 +8.14 27 18 24 1.29 +1.12 1.33 11 .38 +10.06 52 40 65 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 10.27 20.52 +10.25 22 21 9.95 19.68 +9.73 20 19 10.12 20.13 +10.01 42 40 1.00 7.00 +6.00 2 2 7.00 28.00 +21 .00 4 4 5.00 21 .00 +16.00 6 6 9.50 19.35 +9.85 24 23 9.46 21 .13 +11 .67 24 23 9.48 20.24 +10.76 48 46 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school zoootables 6119/00 Washington Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.14 N 7 White Male Mean 1.88 N 8 Total Mean 2.47 N 15 Female Mean 1.11 N 19 Black Male Mean 0.92 N 25 Total Mean 1.00 N 44 Female Mean 2.25 N 4 Other Male Mean 3.00 N 5 Total Mean 2.67 N 9 Female Mean 1.73 N 30 Total Male Mean 1.39 N 38 Total Mean 1.54 N 68 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment '\" Chanae 11.75 +8.61 6.67 21.33 +14.67 4 3 3 7.38 +5.50 5.33 26.00 +20.67 8 6 6 8.83 +6.37 5.78 24.44 +18.67 12 9 9 5.05 +3.95 5.11 14.89 +9.78 19 18 18 3.64 +2.72 2.21 10.61 +8.40 25 19 18 4.25 +3.25 3.62 12.75 +9.13 44 37 36 8.25 +6.00 8.38 23.75 +15.38 4 8 8 8.00 +5.00 4.14 22.29 +18.14 5 7 7 8.11 +5.44 6.40 23.07 +16.67 9 15 15 6.52 +4.79 6.17 18.00 +11.83 27 29 29 5.00 +3.61 3.22 16.23 +13.01 38 32 31 5.63 +4.09 4.62 17.08 +12.46 65 T 61 60 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 30.33 40.67 +10.33 6 6 21.17 38.00 +16.83 6 6 25.75 39.33 +13.58 12 12 20.85 28.55 +7.70 20 20 13.70 22.11 +8.41 27 27 16.74 24.85 +8.11 47 47 12.40 21.60 +9.20 5 5 23.11 29.33 +6.22 9 9 19.29 26.57 +7.29 14 14 21 .32 29.77 +8.45 31 31 16.79 25.93 +9.14 42 42 18.71 27.56 +8.85 73 73 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade . Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , ... An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 Watson Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 1 White Male Mean N Total Mean 0.00 N 1 Female Mean 0.41 N 37 Black Male Mean 1.09 N 35 Total Mean 0.74 N 72 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.39 N 38 Total Male Mean 1.09 N 35 Total Mean 0.73 N 73 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 0.00 0 1 5.00 1 0.00 0 5.00 1 1 2.37 +1 .96 5.88 17.03 +11.16 38 24 29 2.29 +1.20 3.20 8.67 +5.47 38 35 36 2.33 +1.59 4.29 12.40 +8.11 76 59 65 2.31 +1.91 5.88 17.03 +11 .16 39 24 29 2.29 +1.20 3.25 8.67 +5.42 38 36 36 2.30 +1 .57 4.30 12.40 +8.10 77 60 65 Second Grade ~ Fall ***Spring Ajnount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 18.50 34.00 +15.50 4 4 18.50 34.00 +15.50 4 4 18.47 27.76 +9.29 32 33 14.12 22.60 +8.48 26 25 16.52 25.53 +9.02 58 58 30.00 40.00 +10.00 1 1 30.00 40.00 +10.00 1 1 18.82 28.12 +9.30 33 34 14.70 24.17 +9.47 30 29 16.86 26.30 +9.44 63 63 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not tesung al a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Bia by school 2000tabJes 6119/00 Western Hills Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.50 N 2 White Male Mean 0.40 N 5 Total Mean 0.43 N 7 Female Mean 0.67 N 9 Black Male Mean 0.62 N 13 Total Mean 0.64 N 22 Female Mean 4.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 0.00 N 1 Total Mean 2.00 N 2 Female Mean 0.92 N 12 Total Male Mean 0.53 N 19 Total Mean 0.68 N 31 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 3.00 +2.50 6.50 28.86 +22.36 2 6 7 2.40 +2.00 2.67 16.67 +14.00 5 3 3 2.57 +2.14 5.22 25.20 +19.98 7 9 10 4.11 +3.44 4.29 22.24 +17.94 9 17 17 2.15 +1.54 3.60 20.47 +16.87 13 15 15 2.95 +2.32 3.97 21.41 +17.44 22 32 32 28.00 +24.00 1 3.00 +3.00 14.00 28.00 +14.00 1 1 1 15.50 +13.50 14.00 28.00 +14.00 2 1 1 5.92 +5.00 4.87 24.17 +19.30 12 23 24 2.26 +1.74 4.00 20.26 +16.26 19 19 19 3.68 +3.00 4.48 22.44 +17.97 31 42 43 Second Grade ' Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 23.00 44.00 +21.00 4 4 20.00 42.50 +22.50 4 4 21.50 43.25 +21.75 8 8 20.55 39.40 +18.85 11 10 18.13 36.25 +18.13 16 16 19.11 37.46 +18.35 27 26 20.00 44.00 +24.00 1 1 20.00 44.00 +24.00 1 1 21.13 40.93 +19.81 16 15 18.50 37.50 +19.00 20 20 19.67 38.97 +19.30 36 35 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. , An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Efla by school 2000tables 6119100 Williams Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 3.88 N 8 White Male Mean 1.50 N 12 Total Mean 2.45 N 20 Female Mean 1.56 N 18 Black Male Mean 0.50 N 8 Total Mean 1.23 N 26 Female Mean 5.83 N 6 Other Male Mean N Total Mean 5.83 N 6 Female Mean 2.94 N 32 Total Male Mean 1.10 N 20 Total Mean 2.23 N 52 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 8.13 +4.25 14.53 29.88 +15.35 8 17 17 5.00 +3.50 14.30 34.80 +20.50 12 10 10 6.25 +3.80 14.44 31.70 +17.26 20 27 27 5.11 +3.56 7.00 28.83 +21.83 18 12 12 3.00 +2.50 9.65 27.21 +17.56 8 20 19 4.46 +3.23 8.66 27.84 +19.18 26 32 31 11.50 +5.67 44.00 44.00 0 6 1 1 34.00 44.00 +10.00 1 1 11.50 +5.67 39.00 44.00 +5.00 6 2 2 7.06 +4.13 12.50 29.93 +17.43 32 30 30 4.20 +3.10 11.94 30.30 +18.36 20 31 30 5.96 +3.73 12.21 30.12 +17.90 52 61 60 Second Grade , Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Cham1e 28.40 37.33 +8.93 15 15 31.80 40.42 +8.62 20 19 30.34 39.06 +8.72 35 34 27.82 37.41 +9.59 17 17 23.29 36.62 +13.33 14 13 25.77 37.07 +11.29 31 30 28.09 37.38 +9.28 32 32 28.29 38.88 +10.58 34 32 28.20 38.13 +9.93 66 64 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are hig~'.ighted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 2000tables 6119100 Wilson Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 2 White Male Mean 1.00 N 2 Total Mean 0.50 N 4 Female Mean 0.75 N 16 Black Male Mean 1.07 N 29 Total Mean 0.96 N 45 Female Mean 0.00 N 1 Other Male Mean 2.00 N 1 Total Mean 1.00 N 2 Female Mean 0.63 N 19 Total Male Mean 1.09 N 32 Total Mean 0.92 N 51 Little Rock School District SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 1.00 +1.00 2.00 23.33 +21.33 2 3 3 0.00 -1.00 1 0.67 +0.17 2.00 23.33 +21.33 3 3 3 4.35 +3.60 2.21 20.00 +17.79 17 14 14 2.67 +1.60 2.78 23.11 +20.33 30 18 18 3.28 +2.32 2.53 21.75 +19.22 47 32 32 0.00 0 1 3.00 +1.00 1 1.50 .. 2 +0.50 3.80 +3.17 2.18 20.59 +18.41 20 17 17 2.59 I 2.78 23.11 +1.50 +20.33 32 ' 18 18 3.06 ' 2.49 21.89 +2.14 +19.40 52 35 35 Second Grade ., Fall ***Spring A,nount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 25.00 42.00 +17.00 2 2 25.00 42.00 +17.00 2 2 17.13 26.56 +9.42 15 18 15.17 25.21 +10.04 24 24 15.92 25.79 +9.86 39 42 4.00 1 32.00 39.00 +7.00 2 2 32.00 27.33 2 3 -4.67 18.06 26.95 +8.89 17 21 16.46 26.27 +9.81 26 26 17.09 26.57 +9.48 43 47 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are hig~'.ighted in bold. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ella by school 20001ab/es 6119/00 Little Rock School District Woodruff Grade Race Gender Fall Assessment Female Mean 0.00 N 1 White Male Mean 1.00 N 3 Total Mean 0.75 N 4 Female Mean 0.90 N 20 Black Male Mean 1.07 N 15 Total Mean 0.97 N 35 Female Mean N Other Male Mean N Total Mean N Female Mean 0.86 N 21 Total Male Mean 1.06 N 18 Total Mean 0.95 N 39 SY1999-2000 Observation Survey K, 1, and 2 Fall to Spring Change - By School by Grade Developmental Reading Assessment Kindergarten First Grade *Spring Amount of Fall **Spring Amount of Assessment Chanae Assessment Assessment Chanae 1.00 +1.00 19.00 34.00 +15.00 1 4 3 3.00 +2.00 4.00 18.00 +14.00 3 1 1 2.50 +1 .75 16.00 30.00 +14.00 4 5 4 2.05 +1 .15 8.14 22.86 +14.73 20 22 22 2.07 +1 .00 7.10 23.40 +16.30 15 10 10 2.06 +1 .09 7.81 23.03 +15.22 35 32 32 18.00 34.00 +16.00 1 1 18.00 34.00 +16.00 1 1 2.00 +1.14 9.81 24.20 +14.39 21 26 25 2.22 +1 .17 7.75 23.83 +16.08 18 12 12 2. 10 +1 .15 9. 16 24.08 +14.92 39 38 37 Second Grade Fall ***Spring Amount of Assessment Assessment Chanae 29.00 31.50 +2.50 4 4 27.00 36.00 +9.00 4 4 28.00 33.75 +5.75 8 8 28.48 37.10 +8.62 21 20 20.50 27.43 +6.93 14 14 25.29 33.12 +7.83 35 34 3.00 6.00 +3.00 1 1 3.00 6.00 +3.00 1 1 27.58 34.96 +7.38 26 25 21.94 29.33 +7.39 18 18 25.27 32.60 +7.33 44 43 An average level of 2 or more is considered proficient in kindergarten. Segments of the population not testing at a proficient level are highlighted in bold. An average level of 16 or more is considered proficient in first grade. An average level of 24 or more is considered proficient in second grade. Ena by school 2000tables SAT-9 BADGETT Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade* Subtest Precentile Percentile 1996- 1991- 1998- 1~~~- 1996- 1991- 1998- 1999- 1997 1998 Diff. 1999 2000 Diff. 1997 1998 Diff. 1999 2000 Diff. 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 ' 3 Total Reading 14 30 16 17 -13 27 86 59 15 -71 Total Math 9 20 11 16 -4 32 45 13 1 -44 Total Language 15 20 5 18 -2 31 61 30 6 -55 Complete Battery 14 26 12 18 -8 29 64 35 12 -52 5 Total Reading 7 13 6 18 11 7 64 29 -35 41 5 71 21 14 17 14 Total Math 6 13 7 13 7 6 51 40 ,11 40 5 35 23 14 18 15 Total Language 12 14 2 20 11 9 41 53 12 32 3 29 23 16 17 , 13 Complete Battery 10 18 8 21 13 8 47 44 -3 37 6 31 21 20 16 12 BALE Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade* Subtest Percentile Percentile 1~~6- 1~~,- 1~~0- 1~~~- 19~6- 1~~,- ~~o- 1999- 1997 1998 Diff. 1999 2000 Diff. 1997 1998 Diff. 1999 2000 Piff, 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 3 Total Reading 35 27 -8 28 1 57 16 -41 46 30 Total Math 27 17 -10 20 3 43 29 -14 40 11 Total Language 27 21 -6 26 5 43 23 -20 36 13 Complete Battery 33 24 -9 26 2 53 25 -28 43 18 5 Total Reading 21 29 8 22 19 3 25 47 22 29 76 47 37 35 35 23 Total Math 15 27 12 42 14 28 23 43 20 45 24 21 37 31 35 16 Total Language 23 34 11 31 19 12 39 53 14 30 76 46 37 41 35 24 Complete Battery 27 33 6 32 18 14 41 53 12 39 53 14 37 40 35 21 BASELINE Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade* Subtest Percentile Percentile 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- Diff. 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 Diff. 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 3 Total Reading 18 24 6 26 2 32 45 13 59 14 Total Math 19 15 -4 29 14 28 20 -8 35 15 Total Language 13 20 7 31 11 28 41 13 61 20 Complete Battery 20 22 2 29 7 32 43 11 46 3 5 Total Reading 27 14 -13 22 16 6 95 31 -64 31 35 -4 25 15 16 31 Total Math 20 16 -4 14 13 1 83 16 -67 22 23 -1 25 16 19 31 Total Language 37 18 -19 26 21 5 76 14 -62 28 57 -29 25 18 19 31 Complete Battery 27 16 -11 26 18 8 84 26 -58 34 39 -5 25 18 16 31 BOOKER Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade* Subtest Percentile Percentile 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- Diff. 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- Diff. 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 3 Total Reading 26 26 0 35 50 58 8 43 Total Math 23 19 -4 28 41 44 3 44 Total Language 34 24 -10 32 52 57 5 36 Complete Battery 30 27 -3 34 49 57 8 43 5 Total Reading 33 21 -12 39 28 1t 65 60 -5 55 63 -8 91 40 87 78 Total Math 32 17 -15 25 21 4 53 35 -18 33 45 -12 91 26 90 78 Total language 44 31 -13 44 41 3 67 60 -7 55 70 -15 91 45 90 t 77 Complete Battery 38 26 -12 38 32 6 62 53 -9 51 60 -9 91 39 87 \\ 77 BRADY Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade* Subtest Percentile Percentile 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- Diff. 1996- 1997- Diff. 1998- 1999- .Diff. 1997-1998 1998-1999 1997 1998 1999 2000 1997 1998 1999 2000 1996-1997 1999-2000 3 Total Reading 27 26 -1 30 60 35 -25 56 Total Math 34 25 -9 20 65 51 -14 47 Total Language 32 28 -4 26 65 41 -24 48 Complete Battery 32 27 -5 30 63 45 -18 55 5 Total Reading 27 20 -7 23 19 -4 76 33 -43 41 42 1 24 25 41 37 Total Math 18 13 -5 17 14 -3 50 24 -26 15 14 -1 24 16 40 39 Total Language 43 19 -24 21 21 0 64 31 -33 41 37 -4 24 24 40 39 Complete Battery 31 20 -11 23 20 -3 63 36 -27 39 28 -11 24 25 40 37 CARVER Black Students White Students Number Tested Grade Subtest Percentile Percentile 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 1996- 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1401","title":"Report: ''Achievement Disparity Between the Races in the North Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2000-07-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Achievement Disparity Between the Races in the North Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1401"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["30 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1396","title":"Report: Disciplinary Sanctions in the Pulaski County Special School District, Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2000-06-14"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: Disciplinary Sanctions in the Pulaski County Special School District, Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1396"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["73 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1706","title":"Court filings: District Court, two orders; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2000-05"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","School integration","Magnet schools","Education and state","School districts","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","Educational statistics","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, two orders; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1706"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["filing"],"dcterms_extent":["129 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAY 12 2000 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. I, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. * * * * * * * * ORDER No. LR-C-82-866 ED MAY 1 5 2000 OftlCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") filed a motion seeking approval of a revised monitoring plan [ docket no. 3327]. The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") responded in opposition [docket nos. 3340 \u0026 3334], and ADE replied [docket no. 3350]. After careful consideration, the Court determines ADE's motion should be denied. I. The parties' settlement agreement, Part ill.A., in pertinent part, states: The State shall be required (as a non-party) to monitor, through the ADE, the implementation of compensatory education programs by the Districts. . . . Monitoring by the State shall be independent of that of the other parties. It is being done to ensure that the state will have a continuing role in satisfactorily remediating achievement disparities. Any recommendations made by ADE shall not form the basis of any additional funding responsibilities of the State. A State plan for monitoring implementation of compensatory education will be submitted to the parties within 60 days following the execution of the settlement agreement. In 1989, Mr. H. William Allen, on behalf of ADE, submitted the monitoring plan referenced in Part ill.A above. Since then, the parties have referred to the monitoring plan as the \"Allen Letter.\" ADE moves this Court to replace the Allen Letter with a revised monitoring plan, entitled the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan (\"DMAP\"). II. Regarding the State's obligations under the Allen Letter, this Court stated: This plan goes beyond monitoring compensatory education in the three Pulaski County school districts and includes many more areas which ADE promised to extensively monitor and evaluate, including magnet schools, M-to-M transfers, and magnet school transportation. Likewise, the settlement agreement includes other obligations undertaken by ADE in addition to its financial agreement with the parties and, in its monitoring plan, ADE reaffirmed its commitment to undertake extensive monitoring that would fulfill those obligations. ADE never changed its monitoring plan or moved to change the settlement agreement. Therefore, the obligations contained in these two documents [the settlement agreement and monitoring plan] are the obligations to which ADE has committed. 1 Thus the Allen letter contains substantive terms of a consent decree, which relate to the vindication of constitutional rights. Disputed modifications of such terms are governed by a stricter standard than agreed-to modifications. See Appeal of Little Rock Sch. Dist., 949 F.2d 253, 258 (1991). When parties to a consent decree oppose modification, the moving party must show that (1) a significant change in fact or law warrants revision and (2) the proposed modification is tailored to resolve the problems created by the change in circumstances. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 112 S.Ct. 748, 765 (1992). ADE makes four points in support ofDMAP. First, ADE notes that since 1989, the 1 Docket no. 2045, page 2. 2 I I I I I - Court has withdrawn supervision over various portions of the Districts' desegregation plans, and LRSD and PCSSD have revised their plans. While changes in the Districts' desegregation plans may warrant revision of the Allen Letter, ADE fails to explain how it has addressed those changes with the proposed revised monitoring plan. Second, ADE maintains its revisions are needed because \"one of the major reasons the State agreed to extensively monitor the Districts was that the Districts were scheduled to receive millions of dollars ... for 'compensatory education' programs ... [and] those additional funds are no longer being provided to the Districts.\"2 ADE does not specify how DMAP responds to the cessation of state funding for compensatory education. Furthermore, the Court can find no provisions contained in the Allen Letter delineating specific monitoring and reporting obligations related solely to compensatory education funding.3 Third, ADE states that when the State submitted the Allen Letter, the Eighth Circuit had yet to establish the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\"),4 but ADE fails to explain how the proposed plan is tailored to resolve any issues related to ODM monitoring. 2 Docket no. 3328, page 2. 3 The Allen Letter states: The primary focus of the process shall be a continuous assessment of the remedial effectiveness of programs supported partially or fully by special state funding resulting from Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al., No. LR-C-82-866. The programs and services receiving special funding include: 1. Compensatory Education 2. Magnet Schools 3. Magnet School Transportation 4. Majority to Minority Transfers 4 ADE does not contend that ODM monitoring supplants ADE's monitoring obligations. 3 Fourth, ADE emphasizes that the parties have expressed a need for more focused monitoring and assistance from ADE than called for in the Allen Letter and that ADE consulted the parties and ODM in developing the revised monitoring plan. However, two parties, LRSD and Joshua, oppose approval of the revised plan. The Court acknowledges that changed circumstances may warrant revision of ADE's monitoring plan but finds that ADE has failed to demonstrate that DMAP is tailored to address the changed circumstances. Consequently, the Court must deny ADE's motion. m. Joshua opposes approval ofDMAP on grounds the plan is vaguely worded. Additionally, Joshua asserts the proposed plan would duplicate reporting functions already carried out by ODM and the Districts5 and contends ADE should assist the Districts in a \"hands on manner.\"6 According to LRSD, ADE's current monitoring reports consist of reformatted data, originally provided to ADE by LRSD. The District argues that ODM provides sufficient, independent monitoring, rendering ADE's monitoring and reporting activities superfluous. LRSD understands the original objectives of ADE monitoring to be (1) ensuring fiscal accountability to the tax payers of Arkansas (in light of the State's obligation to fund compensatory education programs) and (2) involving the State in improving achievement disparities. Because State funding for compensatory education has ceased, LRSD contends State's role \"should shift from one of monitoring to one of active participation in the district's 5 The Court notes that Part ill.A of the settlement agreement states, \"Monitoring by the State shall be independent of that of the other parties.\" 6 Docket no. 3334. 4 efforts to eliminate the achievement disparity.\"7 LRSD concludes this Court should require a meeting between ADE and LRSD for the purpose ofreaching an agreement regarding the State's role in eliminating achievement disparities. Additionally, LRSD proposes that the Court modify the parties' settlement agreement to increase the financial obligations of the State. Specifically, LRSD requests the State pay for the cost of ODM for the current year and future years and provide the Districts additional resources in the form of personnel or funding equivalent to resources ADE planned to devote to DMAP. This Court remains mindful that \"we are dealing with a settlement\"8 and disagrees that the absence of state funding for compensatory education should shift the State's monitoring role to one of active participation in eliminating achievement disparities. As previously explained, the Allen Letter \"goes beyond monitoring compensatory education ... and includes many more areas which ADE promised to extensively monitor and evaluate, including magnet schools, Mto- M transfers, and magnet school transportation.\"9 Nor does the Court find that increasing the State's financial obligations will resolve problems related to the State's monitoring obligations. A consent decree is a final judgment that may be reopened only to the extent that equity requires, and this Court finds that the record before the Court does not justify increasing the State's financial obligations. See Rufo, 112 S.Ct. 7 Docket 3340, 16. 8 Little Rock School Dist. v. Pulaski County Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371, 1390 (8th Cir. 1990). 9 Id. 5 - at 764 (\"Once a court has determined that changed circumstances warrant a modification in a consent decree, the focus should be on whether the proposed modification is tailored to resolve the problems created by the change in circumstances. A court should do no more, for a consent decree is a final judgment that may be reopened only to the extent that equity requires.\"). As for requiring ADE to negotiate with LRSD, this Court strongly encourages the parties to proceed diligently with negotiations regarding ADE's monitoring obligations, but declines ordering such negotiations at this time. If the parties are unable to reach an agreementregarding the State's monitoring role, upon proper motion, the Court will hold hearings on the matter and take action necessary to ensure the State's monitoring obligations are carried out efficiently and effectively. IV. For the reasons stated, it is hereby ordered that ADE' s motion for approval of a revised monitoring plan be DENIED [docket no. 3327]. IT IS so ORDERED nns J)l)A Y OF MAY, 2000 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT rH1S OOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COUPS. ,E Wl:?;1 RULE 5e ANn 79(~ FRCP ON (,h/JQ !Y '- - 6 MAY 18 2000 tlfiCEOF 9f-5E6RE6Allll IIJ!l10RIII IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTI.,E ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KATIIERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * ORDER FILED EAsTMRsriio1sTR1cr COURT DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAY 16 2000 The Court has received the proposed 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 budgets for the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. The budgets and a cover letter are attached to this Order for the parties' review. Parties have to and including fifteen days from entry of this Order to file objections regarding the proposed budgets. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS _/L~ AY OF MAY, 2000 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT rH1S OOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN_ COUPLWiE WITH RULE 58 AH~a) FRCP , ON 5=:- J '7- o-v ev ________ .!!:L . Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor April 20, 2000 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376~200 Fax (501) 371--0100 ODM budgets for two years, 1999-00 and 2000-01, are attached for the parties' review and your approval. Because one of the school districts did not furnish us a final October 1 student enrollment count (upon which we base the apportionment of charges to the districts) until last month, we are issuing the current-year budget late in the year. By accompanying it with next year's budget as well, we begin a new practice that will enable us to issue our annual budgets in advance of the new fiscal year . From now on, we will propose our budget for the upcoming year before the close of the current fiscal year, using an estimated total for revenue and expenditures, along with the current-year enrollment numbers (which we use as the basis for the portion each district contributes to the ODM budget). Then, when we know actual revenues and expenditures and the new October 1 enrollment numbers, we will adjust each district's contribution accordingly. The format of the budgets follows that of previous budget documents, including annotation to explain revenue calculations; budget category definitions; and budget allocations and anticipated expenditures by category for 1999-00 and 2000-01 . Note that the 1999-00 budget is only 1. 7 6% higher than that of the previous year, and that the 2000-01 budget is a 2.53% increase over that of the previous year. Salary increases for ODM staff are 3.29% per year, which is the prevailing annual experience step increase on the salary scales of the three local districts. We have continued to contain our expenditures such that they are below the projected annual budget at year's end. As is our practice, we credit that difference proportionately to each of the school districts according to their pro-rated contributions to our budget, a return that averages over 12%. If you or the parties should need any additional information, I will be happy to provide it. Sincerely yours, . ~~ Ann S. Brown Enc. OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING: BUDGETS FOR 1999-00 AND 2000-01 REVENUE State of Arkansas LRSD Credit* NLRSD Credit* PCSSD Credit* Interest 1998-99 BUDGET 200,000.00 219,128.14 37,714.98 81 ,227.78 13,929.95 169,293.99 30,344.16 0.00 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 219,128.14 232,137.33 232,137.33 244,131.66 37,714.98 36,967.69 36,967.69 34,175.51 81 ,227.78 82,836.58 82,836.58 87,116.67 13,929.95 13,191.66 13,191.66 12,195.29 169,293.99 172,300.09 172,300.09 181 ,202.67 30,344.16 27,438.65 27,438.65 25,366.20 8,788.39 0.00 5,407.00 0.00 !zje~jtz~~i 1 :: z:i: ;,ijz-- t;,1: :.-1.-.-.,:-:;!:;:::::::t:::::t i;,ee : i ij1n1;19 Every budget cycle, ODM credits each district a pro rata proportion of the unspent amount of the previous year's budget. We apply this amount toward the curr~nt budget allocation. See annotated budget. EXPENDITURES 1998-99 1998-99 1999-00 1999-00 2000-01 BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATED BUDGET Communications 9,180.00 9,157.28 10,000.00 9,832.00 10,000.00 Dues and Fees 3,300.00 3,320.67 3,850.00 3,827.00 4,000.00 Equipment 6,339.00 6,337.94 3,000.00 1,905.00 3,000.00 Food Services 200.00 93.17 200.00 133.00 200.00 Management Services 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 Periodicals 400.00 334.97 450.00 436.00 450.00 Printing and Binding 6,000.00 4,625.75 6,000.00 4,606.00 6,000.00 Prof. and Tech. Services 26,497.00 6,207.50 26,497.00 1,847.00 26,497.00 Rent 50,917.00 50,916.67 51,935.00 51,935.00 52,890.00 Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 720.37 1,200.00 627.00 1,000.00 Resource Library 500.00 28.40 250.00 0.00 200.00 Salaries 492,614.00 474,173.79 508,159.00 482,159.00 523,937.00 Benefits 125,122.00 103,788.82 124,431.00 116,009.96 127,114.00 Staff Development 1,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,025.00 1,000.00 Supplies 7,750.00 7,713.27 7,750.00 7,729.00 7,750.00 Travel 18,000.00 14,090.83 18,000.00 15,825.00 18,000.00 Insurance 820.00 820.00 650.00 646.00 650.00 LRSD ANNOTATED ODM BUDGETS FOR 1999-00 AND 2000-01 REVENUE The Court's Interim Order of June 27, 1989 required that: ... [T]he amount previously ordered for the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative (Co-op) [$200,000.00] shall be applied toward the budget of the office of the Metropolitan Supervisor ... The balance of the budget will be apportioned among the school districts on a per pupil basis ... Eighth Circuit Order of December 12, 1990: ... [T]he office previously known as the Office of the Metropolitan Supervisor will be reconstituted as the Office of Desegregation Monitoring... 10/1/99 o/o of Total 1999-00 Enrollment Enrollment Budget Allocation 1998-99 Credit (Budget not spent) 1999-00 Budget Payment 2000-01 Budget Allocation 25,116 47.64 269,105.02 36,967.69 232,137.33 278,307.16 1999-00 Estimated Credit* (Budget not spent) 34,175.51 NLRSD 8,960 17.00 96,028.24 13,191 .66 82,836.58 99,311.96 12,195.29 2000-01 Estimated Budget Payment* 244,131.66 87,116.67 PCSSD 18,638 35.36 199,738.74 27,438.65 172,300.09 206,568.88 25,366.20 181,202.67 State of AR N/A NIA 200,000.00 NIA 200,000.00 200,000.00 NIA 200,000.00 - ::::i::i:1~w11i;::::::::i::::::i11~l~i1:1 :111111:.11: 1JFt,1iij;,i:i1 ::iiji~iii;qg:: :z~1i11:.1g} ::::::i1~iifi :11,iil1~11 *Because the 2000-01 budget has been prepared before the close of the 1999-00 fiscal year, we have estimated the 1999-00 credits to the districts and the 2000-01 payments due from the districts. After the close of the current fiscal year, we will notify each district of the exact amount due for their share of ODM's 2000-01 budget, incorporating each district's exact credit. Also, adjustments in the apportioned payments for each district in 2000-01 will be made to correspond with the October 1, 2000 enrollment count. Descnbed below is the step-by-step process, reflected in the charts above, that we used to determine each district's contnbution to ODM's budgets: 1. The State of Arkansas' contribution ($200,000.00) is subtracted from ODM's total budget. 2. Based on the previous year's October 1 enrollment, the districts are charged their pro rata share of ODM's budget (minus the state's contnbution). 3. Each district is credited with its pro rata share (or estimated share) of ODM's unspent budget for the previous year. 4. Each district contnbutes that sum to ODM's budget or, if the credit has been estimated, each district will be notified at the close of the current fiscal year of the exact amount due for their share ofODM's budget. EXPENDITURES Note: Definitions of expense categories are based on the Arkansas School Financial Accounting Manual. Communications: Services provided by persons or businesses to assist in transmitting and receiving messages or information. This category includes telephone services as well as postage machine rental and postage. 1998-99 Budget 9,180.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures The budget increase accommodates the rising costs of postage and basic services for various communications, such as telephone and internet. Dues and Fees: Expenditures or assessment for membership in professional or other organizations or associations or payments to a paying agent for services provided, such as conference registration fees. 1998-99 Budget 3,300.00 1998-99 Expenditures 3,320.67 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 3,827.00 The budget increase gives more staff members the opportunity to participate in regional and national conferences. Equipment: Expenditures for the initial, additionai and replacement items or equipment, such as furniture and machinery. 1998-99 Budget 6,339.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures During 1999-00, we will replace a laser printer, color printer, scanner, and printing server and hub; during 2000-01, we will upgrade two computers. Food Services: Expenditures for food or preparation and serving of food, which may include catering. 1998-99 Budget 200.00 1998-99 Expenditures 93.17 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 133.00 Management Services: Services performed by persons qualified to assist management either in the broad policy area or in general operations. This category includes consultants, individually or as a team, to assist the chief executive in conference or through systematic studies. 1998-99 Budget 1,500.00 1998-99 Expenditures 0.00 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 0.00 Periodicals: Expenditures for periodicals and newspapers for general use. A periodical is any publication appearing at regular intervals ofless than a year and continuing for an indefinite period. 1998-99 Budget 400.00 1998-99 Expenditures 334.97 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 436.00 Printing and Binding: Expenditures for job printing and binding, usually according to specifications. This includes the design and printing of forms as well as printing and binding publications. 1998-99 Budget 6,000.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures We are able to contain the cost of this budget category by doing most printing inhouse. Professional and Technical Services: Services which by their nature can be performed only by persons with specialized skills and knowledge. 1998-99 Budget 26,497.00 1998-99 Expenditures 6,207.50 Mansas Financial Services Temporary help/specialized services 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 23,497.00 3,000.00 26,497.00 To date, ODM has not needed Arkansas Financial Services (AFS) to complete the terms of a previous agreement. However, because services ultimately may be required, we are electing to maintain the AFS agreement and, thus, have budgeted an allotment for AFS. Rent: Expenditures for leasing or renting land and buildings for both temporary and long-range use. 1998-99 Budget 50,917.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures Per our lease agreement, the 1999-2000 and 2000-0 l budgets reflect a 2% per year increase in rent. Repairs and Maintenance: Expenditures for repairs and maintenance services which restore equipment to its original state or are a part of a routine preventive maintenance program. This includes service contracts and contractual agreements covering the maintenance and operation of equipment and equipment systems. 1998-99 Budget 1,500.00 1998-99 Expenditures 720.37 1999-00 Estimated [!ti\u0026 IJ i.i~Jii Expenditures 627.00 Resource Libr~ry: Expenditures for regular or incidental purchases of library books available for general use. 1998-99 Budget 500.00 1998-99 Expenditures 28.40 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures Salaries: Salaries are the amounts paid to employees who are considered to be in positions of a permanent or temporary nature. 1998-99 Budget 492,614.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures Salary changes between 1998-99 and 1999-00, as well as between 1999-00 and 2000-01 , reflect a 3.29% increase, which is comparable to the annual step increase in the three Pulaski County school districts. Salaries: Name of Employaa 1998-99 Salary 1999-00 Salary 2000-01 Salary Ann Brown 104,164.00 107,591 .00' 111 ,131 .00 Melissa Guldin 2 48,533.00 50,130.00 51 ,779.00 Gene Jones 3 50,858.00 52,724.00 54,373.00 Norman Marshall 60,666.00 62,662.00 64,724.00 MaroiePowell 60,666.00 62,662.00 64,724.00 Horace Smith 60,666.00 62,662.00 64,724.00 Research Associate4 26,000.00 26,000.00 26,000.00 Pollv Ramer 45,537.00 47,035.00 48,582.00 Linda Brvant 25,252.00 26,083.00 26,941 .00 Jackie Banks5 10,272.00 10,610.00 10,959.00 Ill ;;, ::: 1I::::Illlilt1il I tt:iiroaasttM @ iitti s2a~ Jon 1Ann Brown's last salary increase was in 1993-94. 2Melissa Guldin works 4/5 time. 3Gene Jones works 4/5 time. Mr. Jones elected to receive payment for annual insurance premiums in lieu of the insurance benefits; his salary reflects that decision. 4Position not filled. 5Jackie Banks works 3/5 time . Benefits: Benefits are the amounts paid in behalf of employees and not included in the gross salary, but are over and above. Such payments are fringe benefit payments. 1998-99 Budget 125,122.00 1998-99 Expenditures 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 116,009.96 Below is a breakdown by category of each emoloyee's 1999-00 budgeted fringe benefits: Name Travel Social Retire- Hospital- Life Dental Hospital Allowance Security ment lzatlon Ins. Indemnity Brown 1,800.00 6,310.57 13,126.92 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Guldin 1,200.00 3,926.75 6,159.60 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Jones 960.00 4,106.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Marshall 1,200.00 4,885.44 7,663.44 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Powell 1,200.00 4,885.44 7,663.44 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Smith 1,200.00 4,885.44 7,663.44 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Research 600.00 2,034.90 3,192.00 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 Ramer 0.00 3,598.18 5,644.20 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 0.00 1,995.35 3,129.96 2,233.60 27.60 192.54 60.96 Banks 0.00 811 .67 1,273.20 2,233.60 27.60 192.54 60.96 Short Total Term Benefits 62.88 23,831.63 62.88 13,880.49 0.00 5,066.83 62.88 16,343.02 62.88 16,343.02 62.88 16,343.02 62.88 8,421 .04 62.88 11,836.52 62.88 7,702.89 62.88 4,662.45 ,,, :::::::::::::: ::1aB:I I wii~il :ooij1i;m Muir :ati3afoiE i::::::::::::::::::::,:::,:-:-:- :,:,:,:,:=?:::=,}?:,:,:::,:}:,;;:,;;:/: --:-::::::::: ::rn: oo.g112 Below is a breakdown by category of each employee's 2000-01 budgeted fringe benefits: Name Travel Social Retire- Hospital- Life Dental Hospital Short Total Allowance Security ment lzatlon Ins. Indemnity Term Benefits Brown 1,800.00 6,361 .90 13,551.72 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 24,307.76 Guldin 1,200.00 4,052.89 6,357.48 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 14,204.51 Jones 960.00 4,232.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,192.97 Marshall 1,200.00 5,043.19 7,910.88 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 16,748.21 Powell 1,200.00 5,043.19 7,910.88 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 16,748.21 Smith 1,200.00 5,043.19 7,910.88 2 233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 16,748.21 Research 600.00 2,034.90 3,192.00 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 8,421 .04 Ramer 0.00 3,716.52 5,829.84 2,233.60 44.16 192.54 60.96 62.88 12,140.50 Bryant 0.00 2,060.99 3,232.92 2,233.60 27.60 192.54 60.96 62.88 7,871 .49 0.00 838.36 1 315.08 2,233.60 27.60 192.54 60.96 62.88 4,731 .02 Staff Development: Services performed by persons qualified to assist in enhancing the quality of the operation. 1998-99 Budget 1,000.00 1998-99 Expenditures 500.00 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 1,025.00 Supplies: Expenditures for all supplies for the operation, including freight and cartage. Amounts paid for material items of an expendable nature that are consumed, worn out, or deteriorated in use or items that lose their identity through fabrication or incorporation into different or more complex units or substances. 1998-99 Budget 7,750.00 1998-99 Expenditures 7,713.27 1999-00 Estimated 1!:ii~-~~Ufgiltf/:] Expenditures 7,729.00 Travel: Expenditures for transportation, meals, hotel, and other expenses associated with traveling or business. Payments for per diem in lieu of reimbursements for subsistence (room and board) also are charged here. 1998-99 Budget 18,000.00 1998-99 Expenditures 14,090.83 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 15,825.00 Insurance: Expenditures for all types of insurance coverage such as property, liability, fidelity, as well as the costs of judgments. 1998-99 Budget 820.00 1998-99 Expenditures 820.00 1999-00 Estimated Expenditures 646.00 RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / E~ASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JUN 2 2000 Off\\GEOf t\u0026GRfGAllON MONITORING WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. NOTICE OF FILING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of AD E's Project Management Tool for May, 2000 . ' _j\\ffr/ . :~/ .-.:~. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorney eral 323 Center Street, uite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KA THERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each morith, August - June. 2. Actual as of May 31, 2000 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "}],"pages":{"current_page":15,"next_page":16,"prev_page":14,"total_pages":48,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":168,"total_count":567,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":90},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":73},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":53},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":33},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":6},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":5},{"value":"Office of Education and Lead Planning and Desegregation","hits":5},{"value":"Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"William Gordon Associates","hits":3},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":567},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":561},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":400},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":376},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":351},{"value":"School integration","hits":176},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":174},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":173},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":156},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","hits":144}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":566},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":565},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":555},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":486},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Massachusetts, Middlesex County, Cambridge, Harvard University, 42.377, -71.11666","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":566},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":129},{"value":"1995","hits":120},{"value":"1996","hits":107},{"value":"1993","hits":98},{"value":"1997","hits":93},{"value":"1992","hits":85},{"value":"1998","hits":82},{"value":"1999","hits":81},{"value":"2000","hits":78},{"value":"1991","hits":77},{"value":"2001","hits":72},{"value":"2003","hits":62},{"value":"1990","hits":53},{"value":"2002","hits":53},{"value":"2004","hits":50},{"value":"2005","hits":47},{"value":"1989","hits":39},{"value":"2006","hits":31},{"value":"1988","hits":24},{"value":"2010","hits":21},{"value":"2008","hits":19},{"value":"2009","hits":17},{"value":"2007","hits":15},{"value":"2013","hits":15},{"value":"1986","hits":14},{"value":"2012","hits":14},{"value":"1987","hits":13},{"value":"2011","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"1985","hits":8},{"value":"2014","hits":6},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"1980","hits":4},{"value":"1981","hits":4},{"value":"1982","hits":4},{"value":"1983","hits":4},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"1950","hits":2},{"value":"1951","hits":2},{"value":"1952","hits":2},{"value":"1953","hits":2},{"value":"1954","hits":2},{"value":"1955","hits":2},{"value":"1956","hits":2},{"value":"1957","hits":2},{"value":"1958","hits":2},{"value":"1959","hits":2},{"value":"1960","hits":2},{"value":"1961","hits":2},{"value":"1962","hits":2},{"value":"1963","hits":2},{"value":"1964","hits":2},{"value":"1965","hits":2},{"value":"1966","hits":2},{"value":"1967","hits":2},{"value":"1968","hits":2},{"value":"1969","hits":2},{"value":"1970","hits":2},{"value":"1971","hits":2},{"value":"1972","hits":2},{"value":"2015","hits":1},{"value":"2016","hits":1},{"value":"2017","hits":1},{"value":"2018","hits":1},{"value":"2019","hits":1},{"value":"2020","hits":1},{"value":"2021","hits":1},{"value":"2022","hits":1},{"value":"2023","hits":1},{"value":"2024","hits":1},{"value":"2025","hits":1},{"value":"2026","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2026","count":1641,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":282},{"value":"reports","hits":194},{"value":"filing","hits":49},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":34},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16},{"value":"minutes (administrative records)","hits":16},{"value":"correspondence","hits":3},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"printouts","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":566}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":566},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}