{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1411","title":"Report: ''The Status of the North Little Rock School District Implementation of its Desegregation Plan,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2004-06-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School buildings","School facilities","School employees","School enrollment","School discipline","School integration","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Student suspension"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''The Status of the North Little Rock School District Implementation of its Desegregation Plan,'' Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1411"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["116 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1061","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-06"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1061"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["74 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda RECEIVED JUN 2 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION f,iONITORlNG Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting ENJOY A JAFE \u0026amp; HAPPY JUMMER! JUNE 2004 Ann Marshall, Federal Monitor OFFICE OF DESEG. MO ITORING n~ \u0026gt;.\nmti ,,-- ,_-- 1E Oz o\u0026gt; ~ 31 m..,\nti C: -z\ngn o--1 ,,-- iz5 n\"' ~,- IX\n,c n IT =l 31: ,::.~ m~ zu (/) \"T e :I I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests REGULAR MEETING June 24, 2004 5:30 p.m. 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: IV. V. A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Special Meeting - 05-19-04 Regular Meeting - 05-20-04 Special Meeting - June 8, 2004 Special Meeting - June 10, 2004 Special Meeting - June 11, 2004 B. Board Meeting Oates, 2004-05 School Year C. Personnel Changes Bargaining Rights of LRSD Paraprofessionals \u0026amp; Custodians Hiring of Additional Teaching Staff :- (\")\"ti ,.,\u0026gt;. .....\n.,.m,.:_..,. ... :!I: Oz o\u0026gt;\n,:,\ntJ C-\u0026lt; m..,\n,:, C: -z\n,:,n 0-1 ,....5 l\"'\"Z (\")(/) \u0026gt; F .\n=,, g ~mme ,.... C: (\")~ o,.... ~~ :::: m ~ Regular Board Meeting June 24, 2004 Page2 VI. CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION: A. Program Evaluation Agenda for 2004-05 B. Contract for Technology Services C. Federal Grant Submission: Mentoring Programs VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Proposed Budget for Annual School Election B. Memorandum of Understanding: Protection of Historic Resources \u0026amp; Cultural Landscape C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions IX. STUDENT DISCIPLINARY ACTION X. ADJOURNMENT n-,:, \u0026gt;,... ... ...\nm._D.. - ii: Oz o\u0026gt;\nD ~ ~ ...\n,\n, C: -z\n,\n,n o\"\"' i= ~ n v, ~ PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MA TIERS/ WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATlbNS ti. KtMAKI\\.:, tKUM CITIZENS C. LRCIA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Junious Babbs OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 447-2955 E-Mail: junious.babbs@lrsd.org PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Julie Wiedower, Director of Student Registration Requested Data DATE: June 24, 2004 In response to Student Registration Office (SRO) related questions in the June 10th agenda meeting, the following information is provided. Mrs. Wiedower will be present to provide appropriate updates and answer questions. 1. High School Enrollment Figures Central Hall Fair McClellan Parkview 04-05 Students Assigned 2402 1375 1147 1041 1121 as of June 15, 2004 03-04 Students Assigned 2197 1345 1082 1139 1161 as ofJunel7, 2003 03-04 Students Enrolled 2111 1327 1023 1006 1131 as of October 1, 2003 2. 2004-05 Central High Enrollment ~ !Othgr 11 thgr ~ New M to M students from PCSSD 33 4 0 New students to LRSD 61 6 18 3 :..n.. m C') :z:c 0 r- 8 -\u0026lt; RI c3 ~ f' CD C 8 !:!l .C,, 0 ~ m p CD 0 ozoz .O,, !.! l jg RI l\nc3 .C.'.). .\n.D.. u,_ !\" z.... m ~ ,\"f!.:. C 0 :::. 0\nD 3. 2004-05 Specialty Magnet Programs Enrollment Magnet Students School Magnet Program From Outside Name of School Population Population Attendance Zone B NB T B NB T B NB T CENTRAL 1251 1141 2392 256 286 542 205 244 449 HALL 1028 342 1370 57 55 112 26 35 61 FAIR* 922 206 1128 79 47 +126 56 38 94 McCLELLAN* 946 87 1033 22 7 +29 5 2 7 DUNBAR 490 316 806 95 260 +355 47 200 247 HENDERSON 519 135 654 113 56 169 53 34 87 CLOVERDALE * 589 117 706 13 II +24 0 3 3 MABELVALE * 485 149 634 63 51 +114 24 23 47 KING 342 266 608 43 182 225 WASHINGTON 388 157 545 41 108 149 ROMINE 234 91 325 27 53 80  All Specialty Magnet Schools have an established attendance zone (az).  After assignment of az students, magnet seats are then made available as space allows. *Entire school population participates in magnet courses (MSAP Grant). + Students magnet program application '54n Individual Approach to a World ef Knowledge\" DATE: June 24, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman ~ SUBJECT: June 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects Several future construction projects have been added to this month's report. The Director of Facility Services is in the process of negotiating contracts with architects. The future projects are: Media Center expansion at Carver Addition to Fair Park Remodel at Forest Heights Addition to Gibbs Remodel at Meadowcliff There are several school projects that are supposed be finished by the time school starts. As always, it will be frantic. We are keeping our fingers crossed that there will be a limited amount of inconvenience to the students and staff. Please call me at 447-1146 if you have any questions. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.1rsd.k12.ar.us 501 -324-2000  fa,-x: 501 -324-2032 :..\"..' ~ :z:c 0  -\u0026lt;\no m  .r,\u0026gt;, m\no ~z z ,m... (\") ::c ~ C) m Cl\u0026gt; !\" .z... m ~ ,\u0026gt;... \u0026gt; C 0 :::\n0\no CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JUNE 24, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I I t:st. t,\nompIetIon Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Baseline Renovation ______ _________ $953,520 1 Jul-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms ________ ~ $25,000 Aug-04 ,_B_o_o_ke_r_ __ _____---+ _R_o_o_f_ ___________ $48,525 Aug-04 Brady Addition/renovation___ ____ $973,621 Aug-04 Central Renovation - Interior $1Q,20Q,266 Aug-05 -C-en- tral --------HVACRenovation - Band Area ____ $225,000 1 Dec-04 Central Reflecting Pond - $50,000 Aug-04 Chicot 'Drainage ___ ----~- $64,700 1 Aug-04 Chicot I Sound Attenuation --------,.- $43,134 Aug-04 _D_od_dFire Alarm Upgrade--=- ___ ____,__ $9,200 . Aug-04 1 D_u_n_ba_r _______ __,Ren_o_va_tion/addition $6,149,023 Dec-04 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music J. A. Fair room addition ____ ____ $3,155,640 Jul-04 Geyer Spr-in_g_s-----+R- oo_f_R_e_p_a-ir- $161 ,752 - ---A-ug-04 Henderson ____ lGckers -- - --~ $80,876 Aug-04 Mablevale Elem - Fire Alarm Upgrade ____ $12,00Occ--=.-=_-=_-=_-=_:=:=:=A:=u~g--0-4 McClellan Classroom Addition-- $2,155,622 Jul-04 McDermott - Fire Alarm Upgrade - ~~~~--=---- $7,700- Aug-04 Mitchell Building Remediation __-= ._-:_- $165,000 Jul-04 Otter Creek Icooling Tower I $50,000 Jul-04 Parkview Addition - - - __ _,__ $2,12'f:'226 Aug-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem _--Renovatio~ --------~-_ $1 ,193,259~-_- _-_-_A~u~g-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 ~ g-04 Southwest -- Addition - - - $2,000,000 ~ g-04 Tech Ctr / Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II - - $3,679,000 Jun-04 Wakefield _-_~---_ ~Rebuild ---- $5,300,000 ----J-u-1-04 Washington lfire Alarm Upgraae- ~- $11]60 ~ _ Aug-04 Western Hills --ADA Rest rooms - -- $25,000 _ A~ g-04 Western Hills -- Fire Alarm Upgrade -- $8,400 Auq-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SUMMER/ FALL 2004 I I I t:st. 1.,\nompIet1on Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Mitchell Renovation $2,212,493 Auq-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED I I I Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker ___ Electrical Upgrade _ Unknown Unknown Carver __ Media Center Expansion _ __ _ $167,490 Unknown Chicot : Electrical Upgrade Unknow\n-- Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition _____ t- $520,750~ Aug-05 Fair Park - Addition _ _ __ -= _ $799,000 __ Unknown Forest Heights _ Remodel _ ~ $1 ,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel . Unknow\n::_ Unknown Gibbs =-~~~~- ~ dition -=_=-- -- __ - $705,670  Unknown Meadowcliff Remodel ___ $164,150 Unknown Pulaski Hgts~ - - Energy monitoring system installation - Unknown Unknown Rightsell _____ Renovation ::- $2,494,00_0__ Aug-06 Scott Field ____ Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; 1::!VAC _-, - $640,000 - Aug-05 Woodruff Parkinq addition $193,777~ Unknown CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD JUNE 24, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description Cost Administration IAsbestos abatement __ $380,495 __ M_ar_-0_3 :~~:~:::~:::~~ I ~~~s:I=~~s~yst_em____ ___ _ __ :\n:~~~ :~~:~\nAdministration Annex Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation -- ___ $_1_5~, 1_60 ____ Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett JFire alarm - - -- $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation _ ___ $2,244 ,524 _ _ Dec-02 Bal_e _____ ~ nergymonitoring system Mar-02 Bale -Partial roof replacement $269,5~ Dec-01 Bale HVAC -- $664,587 Aug-01 Book~ Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Book~ --- -7Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker l Asbestos abatement -- --+ - --$10,900 Feb-02 Book_er __ Fire alarm - ' $34 ,50_1~-- Mar-02 Brad Energy efficient lighting -T- - $80,593 Sep-02 Bradc\"-y ______ ~ Asbestos abatement $345,072 Aug-02 Carver I Energy monito- r-in_g_s-ys-te- m- in-stallation ----'$_14-',~480--'-___ May-01 Carver Parkinglot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Central Parkin=g ___ --'-S=-tudent pa~rk_in~g_______ $174,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair 7 $265,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement -~----$-3-8~,0-0_0_ Aug-03 Central/Quigley I rrigation System $14,500 1 Aug-03 Central P urchase land for school Unknown Dec-02 Central Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Dec-02 Central - Ceiling and wall repair 1 - - $24-,0-00-- Oct-01 Central 'Fire Alarm System -D-e-si-g-n/-ln-s-ta_ll_a_tio_n ______ $_8_0~,8-76_ Aug-01 Central 1Front landing tile repair -- $22,470 - Aug-01 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient ligh_tin~g__ $132,678 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting $189,~ Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd - Energy efficient lighting +- $90.~ Aug-01 Dodd - Asbestos abatement-ceiiing!ile $156,~ - Jul-01 Dodd Replace rooftop HVAC $215_,_570 Aug-02 Facilities Service Interior renovation -r- $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services Fire alarm ---- ,. $12,000 - Aug-03 Fair Park -HVAC r-e-n-ov-a-ti-on/fire alarm $ 315,956~ Apr-02 Fair Park --Energy efficient lig~ ---..-- ~ 2 Aug-01 Fair Park ______. ..,.A.,. sbestos abatement-ceiling $59,310 Aug-01 J. A. Fair Energy efficien_t_lig-ht-in_g_~------ $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box $10,7~ Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security ca~m~e,-ras____ $12,500 - JJ~:~\nJ. A. Fair Athletic Field lmprovem_ ent__ _____ $38,000 Jul-0 J. A. Fair Irrigation System $14_,_ooo 3 J. A. Fair Roof repairs t- $391 ,871 Aug-03 Forest Park _ __ _ Replace windowunits w/central HVAC----,... $485,258 Nov-03 Forest Park Diagonal parking $111 ,742 Aug-03 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting ,. - $119,788 May-01 Fulbright Energy efficient lighting $134,463 ~ Jun-01 Fulbright Energy monitoring_s_y~st~em_i-nstallation __l -- $11 ,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace rooftop HVAC units $107,83~ Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbri ht I Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 2 !\"' ,::, m\n,o !S z z ,m-n ::c  z C) m \"' !Tl z_, m I  C: 0 :::. 0\n,o CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JUNE 24, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I l l Est. Completion Facility Name Proiect Descriotion Cost Date Franklin Renovation $2,511,736 Mar-03 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447-- Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring systerninstaliation\n----$11,770 - Jul-01 Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition __ $8,637,709 - Sep-03 Hall !Asbestos abatement I $168,222_,__ Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting -i--- $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707=-~---- Apr-01 Hall I infrastructure improvements 1 - $93~657 Aug-01 Hall Intercom _______ Feb-01 Hall Security cameras -1-- $10,600 - Jun~01 Henderson Energy efficient lighting i ---r-, 93,679- --Juf:o1 Henderson Roof replacement gym___ i $107,835 ___ May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I _ __ $500,000 Aug-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 _ _ _ $250,oo_c - - Aug-02 IRC Energy efficientllgi,Ting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement -----= ~ - $43,639 ~. -- Qci-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot_________ $269,588 ~-- Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. 'Energy monitoring system installation ,.. - $12,150-= _ Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units -- I - $300,000 Au.9.-02 Mabelvale Elem. TAsbestos Abatement I $107,000 - - Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting - $$1 1 0 34 6.,5 7 99 8 3 _:__ ~:~:~2 Mabelvale MS --Renovate bleachers ___-:= _-:=_-:=_-=-._ 1 Mabelvale MS - Renovation -- -.. $6,851,621- Mar-04 Man!!__ - -- 'Partia!Replacement __ ~ __ $11 ,500,000-=-- Apr-04 Mann -- - - _Asphalt walks -- -- - The total $1 .8 million Dec-01 Man~ _ Walkway canopies ____ __ _ iswhathasbeen Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 M~-- _ _:=_ - -\nFencing -~~~~- ___-:= _-:=_-:=_ __ projects listed - - Sep-01 Mann______ Part@!_Q_emolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan_____ __6thletic Field Improvement ---\"- _ $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System __ + _ $14,750_ Jul-03 McClel~ _ Security cameras -~- - $36,300 ____ Jun-01 McClellan Energy efficient lighting _ $303,614 May-01 McClellan --- Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 McClellan __ -_-__ --Intercom ---------=--=----=--- - $46,000-- Feb-02 McDermott _ __ _Ene!ID'. efficient lighting_ - $79,411~ - Feb-01 McDermott__ __ Replace rooftop HVAC units __ _ -+---- $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm __ __ _ - $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 Aug-02 Meadowcliff - - - - Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitar, Replace cooling tower -- - ~7,203- Dec-00 Metropolitan _ _ -Replace shop vent system_ + $20,000 - May-01 Metropolit~ Energy monitoring system installation +- _ $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting - $10f642 Apr-01 Mitchell -= _ ~ Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 - - Jul-01 Mitchell _2sbestos abatement __ $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurs_t__ HVAC renovation $237,237 _ Aug-01 Otter Creek _ _ Energy monitoring system installation _ $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek __ _ - Energy efficient lighting $81,~ Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement _ __!:10,00.Q_j_ Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot ___ __ $138,029 Aug-02 Otter Creek ____ 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek Parkinqlmprovements -- -- - $142,541 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JUNE 24, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I I Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview I Roof replacement $273,877 J__ ~-01 Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview I HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301,938 =- Aug-01 Parkview 'Locker replacement I $120,000 Aug-0__!_ Parkview Energy efficient lighting 1 $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 : Jun-02 Procurement I Fire alarm I $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground I $17,000 Dec-02 ~ghtsell __ ....,..,Energy efficient lighting 1 $84,898 _ A~-01 Rockefeller I Energy e~ghting -- I $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller I Replace rooftop HVAC - $539,175 Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition ~-----~----_-_ ----$111)42--,- - - Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement I $10,000-- ~r-02 Romine -- Major renovation \u0026amp; addition ---- $3,534,675 - Mar-03 Security/Transportation Bus earner~ ---- - ~ -- $22,500 - Jun-01 Southwest jAsbestos abatement I $28,138___ Aug-00 Southwest New roof I $690,ooo - Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,71~ Jan-02 Southwest Drainage / street widening I --$25Q,OOO .L. Aug-03 Student Assignment ~ nergy monitoring system installation I $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment --Firealarm ' $9,000 --- Aug-03 Tech Center ptiase-, --+-Renovation -----,---=- --1-- $275,000 Dec-01 Technology Upgrade ---iu\"pgrade phone system \u0026amp; da-ta-- I Nov-02 Terry - ~ Energy efflCientlighting-- 1 $73,850 - Feb-01 Terry -- - Driveway \u0026amp; Parking ! $83,484 -r---- Aug-02 Ter- -- - --rMeciiaeenter addition-- I $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield - - Security cameras _____ _,__ __ $8,000-r- Jun-01 Wakefield -- -- Energy efficient lighting $74,776 -, - - Feb-01 Wakefield -- ~ ----i-DemOlition/Asbestos Abatement ___ $200,000 Nov-02 Washington Security cameras -- --- .,. $7,900 -- Jun-01 Washington - - Energy efficient lighting -- ----1--- $165)81- -=- Apr-01 Watson _._Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson - - Asbestos abatement -+ -- $182,241 - Aug-01 Watson -=- --Energy efficient lighting ___ -- $106,868 _ Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Wais~ ---- ~ ajar renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,_000 Aug-02 Western Hills Asbestos abatement -- -- -- $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills -- --,Intercom ----.___ $7,100 - Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting - _ $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation -----t--- $2,106,492 Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions -----.....- $183,717' - Dec-03 Williams -- Energy efficient lighting ---+-~~~$122,719 -,--- Jun-01 Wilson - -- -Renovation/expansion $1 ,263,876 _ Feb-04 Wilson-- --- Parking Expansion ___ $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff - Renovation - $246,419 Auo-02 4 .r.\u0026gt;, m\nJD is zz m,.... n :z: ~ Cl m \"' fT1 .z.... m\nJD z \u0026gt;,.... \u0026gt; C: C ::. 0\nJD Date: June 24, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS To: Board of Directors From:@Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - June This is the fifty-sixth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two middle schools and two elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. .:n.. Pl ::c z 0 8 -\u0026lt;\nD m i3 ::!:l .r.\u0026gt;, m\nD ~z z ,m- C') ::c \u0026gt;z C) m \"' Audit Report - June 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator ofUnited Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: June 24, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Both Computer Information Services and Instructional Technology departments are preparing for the move to the new LRSD Technology Center within the next few weeks.  The number of secondary language arts classrooms that utilize Read 180 software from Scholastic is expanding to five more sites. When the expansion is completed, there will be classrooms at 10 of the 13 secondary schools that use this software to help students learn language arts skills.  Staff from Computer Information Services is performing summer maintenance at all sites to ensure that all machines have the latest updates and service packs. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical May 20, 2004 - June 24, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: June 24, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Both Computer Information Services and Instructional Technology departments are preparing for the move to the new LRSD Technology Center within the next few weeks.  The number of secondary language arts classrooms that utilize Read 180 software from Scholastic is expanding to five more sites. When the expansion is completed, there will be classrooms at 10 of the 13 secondary schools that use this software to help students learn language arts skills.  Staff from Computer Information Services is performing summer maintenance at all sites to ensure that all machines have the latest updates and service packs. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical May 20, 2004 - June 24, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 (501) 324-2012 Date: June 24, 2004 To: From: Re: Board of Directors Morris L. Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent Board Meeting Dates, 2004-05 School Year The proposed schedule of meeting dates for the 2004-2005 school year is presented for your review and approval. By Board policy, the second and fourth Thursday of each month are designated as regular meeting dates. The exceptions occur in November and December to avoid conflict with the holidays. The administration recommends approval of the following schedule: MONTH AGE DAMEETI G REGULAR MEETING July 07-08-04 07-22-04 August 08-12-04 08-26-04 September 09-09-04 09-23-04 October 10-14-04 10-28-04 November 11-11-04 11-18-04 December 12-09-04 12-16-04 January 01-13-05 01-27-05 February 02-10-05 02-24-05 March 03-10-05 03-24-05 April 04-14-05 04-28-05 May 05-12-05 05-26-05 June 06-09-05 06-23-05 Em n .z... .. , Om 2!,!C zm C..,,)..~.. ::0 C) 8~ ~z E..,. en .,.. ~:!! z Ca,  c ,- en !llz :cm gi:: ,.... gi m\n:o !ii~ ..,.m c5 en z p .., m ::0 lS zz I!) n ::c ~ C) m en DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS June 24, 2004 Board of Education \\ fj1Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with AC.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for ail teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. !mI: n .z.... ., ., Om i!,!C zm c,~ -o,\n: o C, 8~ ~z !I: .... rn ::a, 15. ::!I: ::0 -C rn  \"\"n Om\n:oz l'i--t rn~\nJr- Personnel Changes Page 2 June 24, 2004 NAME Allison, Misty Reason: None Given Alverson, Raymond Reason: Retired Armstrong, J runes Reason: Retired Balenko, Mary Reason: Retired Batt, Ann Reason: Retired Brezee, Scott Reason: None Given Caruth, Phyllis Reason: Retired Davis, Kenneth Reason: Retired Davis, Waverly Reason: Retired Dugan, Frances Reason: Retired POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Emplovees Elem I 8-7-02 1-02 BOOKER 6-8-04 TCH925 Librarian 8-23-76 4-19 CENTRAL 6-1-04 LIB950 Science 8-16-94 4-13 FAIR 5-28-04 TCH925 Reading 8-20-79 5-20 BALE 5-28-04 CED925 Elem II 8-12-99 6-12 WASHINGTON 5-28-04 TCH925 Phyical Ed. 7-17-03 4-01 MCCLELLAN 5-28-04 TCHl0 Trigonometry 8-23-76 6-21 CENTRAL 5-28-04 TCH925 Special Ed 1-16-01 4-19 SPECIAL ED. 5-28-04 SPE925 Elem ill 8-15-94 1-17 FULBRIGHT 5-18-04 TCH925 Kindergarten 2-27-78 6-21 BRADY 6-1-04 K925 ANNUAL SALARY 27834.00 49737.00 42985.00 52205.00 44797.00 31431.00 54700.00 49737.00 43513 .00 54700.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 June 24, 2004 NAME Faulkner, Elizabeth Reason: Retired Foster, Nancy Reason: Retired Guest, Julia Reason: Health Grossman, Elizabeth Reason: Accepted Another Position Hall, Shirley Reason: Retired Hennessey, Jennifer Reason: Accepted Another Position Higginbotham, Patricia Reason: Retired Holcomb, Irene Reason: Retired Hornsby, Courtney Reason: Personal Isely, Randee Reason: Accepted Another Position POSITION SCHOOL Reading CHICOT Math PUl. HGTS. MID. Math HENDERSON English FAIR Elem I CLOVERDALE Psy. Examiner HENDERSO Math PUL. HGTS. MID. Economics MANN Oral Comm. CENTRAL Special Ed. START DATE END DATE 8-7-02 5-28-04 8-20-90 5-28-04 8-21-73 5-28-04 8-7-03 5-28-04 8-23-68 6-29-04 8-20-01 6-30-04 8-10-81 5-28-04 11-7-83 5-28-04 8-13-97 5-28-04 12-17-01 MABELV ALE MID. 7-1-04 SALARY CLASS 4-13 CED925 4-18 TCH925 5-20 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 6-21 TCH925 61-11 ADC105 6-21 TCH925 2-17 TCH925 3-07 TCH925 1-03 SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 42985.00 48237.00 52205.00 27309.00 54700.00 43608.00 54700.00 44879.00 35291.00 28359.00 !I: mn z.... .. , Om 2!!C zm ~C) .~- ,0 C) 8~ ~z :1:\"\"' C/) .,,. ~\na z C: to \u0026gt;c: ,- C/) ~z ::i::m 8~ ,- Kl m\n,o i\n~ nm gt/) z ~::i::c-:o ::i::!I: ::i::O -C: C/). O\"m'n '\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; z.... gi~ m .,,. ~s\n,o . 8n ~ls :I: ,0 m\u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; \u0026lt; C: ~ l:: . !I: \u0026gt;go C)_ mz ZC/\u0026gt; ,c.-.-. \u0026lt; Personnel Changes Page 4 June 24, 2004 NAME Lawson, Karon Reason: Leaving City Levin, Barbara Reason: Retired McDougal, Mark Reason: Accepted Another Position McGinness, Alana Reason: Accepted Another Position Mims,Mary Reason: Personal Mosby, Jimmy Reason: Retired O'Keefe, Lucille Reason: Retired Pritz, Colleen Reason: Leaving City Redmond, Rhonda Reason: Accepted Another Position Robinson, Susie Reason: Retired POSITION SCHOOL Art FRANKLIN Math MANN East Lab FAlR Business Ed. MCCLELLAN English DUNBAR Asst. Principal CE TRAL ElemN OTTERCREEK Pre-Algebra PUL. HGTS. MID. ElemN BALE ElemV GIBBS START DATE END DATE 8-12-96 5-28-04 8-23-76 5-28-04 8-9-00 5-28-04 8-2-00 5-28-04 8-18-92 5-28-04 8-24-73 6-8-04 8-24-87 5-28-04 8-22-88 5-28-04 8-7-03 5-28-04 8-20-90 5-28-04 SALARY CLASS 4-10 TCH925 4-19 TCH925 2-04 TCH925 5-05 TCH950 1-10 TCH925 66-20 ADC105 4-19 TCH925 2-16 TCH925 4-07 TCH925 4-19 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 39834.00 49737.00 30775.00 36000.00 35711.00 66240.00 49737.00 43379.00 36683.00 49737.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 June 24, 2004 NAME Schiffer, Amanda Reason: Leaving City Scrubbs, Verna Reason: Did not return from Leave Sharlow, Alan POSITION SCHOOL Elem III WASHINGTON Elem III BOOKER Music START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 5-28-04 8-21-89 6-1-04 8-7-02 Reason: Returning to School CENTRAL 5-28-04 Sneed, Mary Special Ed. 8-13-98 Reason: Accepted Another FOREST HGTS. 6-1-04 Position Watson, Billy Math 8-23-71 Reason: Retired CENTRAL 7-1-04 Watson, Gladystine Career Coor. 8-25-69 Reason: Retired HALL 7-1-04 Wood, Paula Spec. Ed. Supv. 8-19-91 Reason: Accepted Another SPECIAL ED. 6-30-04 Position New Certified EmJ?IOl'.ees Certified Promotion SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCH925 1-17 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 5-06 SPE925 6-21 TCH925 6-21 VOC105 68-12 ADCll ANNUAL SALARY 31431.00 44879.00 27834.00 37051.00 53213.00 54700.00 55380.00 !: m.z... .n. ., Om -\nmoo ~$? -,:,,-\no Cl 8 $? $? z !: .... \"' .,. ~~ z C: a,  C: ,- \"' !!lz :rm 8 gi ,- gi m\no ~~ ~~ 0z :r a, ci~ :r 0 = \"'.C : --\u0026lt;n Om ~z n--\u0026lt; \"'~ ~,- Personnel Changes Page 6 June 24, 2004 NAME NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Bosley, Michael Custodian 9-5-80 1-11 Reason: Personal CLOVERDALE EL. 6-24-04 CUS12 Briggs, Bobby Custodian 9-7-76 1-11 Reason: Retired FOREST HGTS. 7-1-04 CUS12 Carpenter, Michael Care 11-17-03 1-02 Reason: None Given CARE 5-1-04 CARE Cadman, Suzanne Clerical 12-7-81 44-20 Reason: Retired Ilv1C 6-30-04 CLK12 Cranford, Rose Nurse 10-15-01 1-09 Reason: Retired FRANKLIN 5-28-04 NURSES Croswell, Carolyn Instr. Aide 8-20-98 1-06 Reason: Retired BOOKER 5-30-04 INA185 Frizzell, Jennifer Instr. Aide 2-28-04 1-07 Reason: Personal ROCKEFELLER 6-2-04 INA12 Germany, Lisa Child Nutrition 1-8-04 3-01 Reason: Personal CLOVERDALE MID.4-26-04 FSH550 ANNUAL SALARY 19385.00 19385.00 6.48 34344.00 34661.00 13166.00 17418.00 8364.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 June 24, 2004 NAME Grimmett, Bonnie Reason: Retired Holder, Alice Reason: None Given Jones, Jessinca Reason: None Given Land, Kitty Reason: None Given Modeste, Leon Reason: None Given Morgan, April Reason: Personal Peters, Novella Reason: None Given Poe, Lachunda Reason: Abandonment Reyes, Norma Reason: Abandonment Rodgers, Sylvia Reason: Abandonment Smith, Vernon Reason: Personal POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide CARVER Care CARE Care CARE P.O. Specialist PROCUREMENT Instr. Aide BRADY Child Nutrition WILLIAMS Care CARE Child Nutrition HALL Child Nutrition DUNBAR Child Nutrition SOUTHWEST Maintenance FACILITY SERV. START DATE END DATE 8-27-90 5-28-04 8-20-97 5-28-04 11-25-02 5-28-04 8-10-87 6-30-04 8-5-02 5-28-04 8-29-97 5-27-04 4-10-96 5-28-04 1-15-03 4-29-04 4-4-03 4-2-04 8-20-03 4-19-04 5-2-88 6-11-04 SALARY CLASS 1-10 INA925 2-12 CARE 1-03 CARE 46-20 AN12 1-10 INA925 3-07 FSH550 1-07 CARE 3-02 FSH550 3-01 FSH550 3-01 FSH550 57-20 ADN12 ANNUAL SALARY 14472.00 8.42 6.62 40116.00 14472.00 8606.00 7.17 8404.00 8364.00 8364.00 50628:00 !I:: m.z... .n. , Om -\n:moo .i.!,5,.~..\n:o C\u0026gt; 8~ !:!:i er, .,.. ~~ z  C: a, \u0026gt;,... cer:, ~z :,:m 8g: ,- gi m\n:o r-:5 mn ~~ 0 z :,: a, c\n~ :,::0 :!: C: er, ' -\u0026lt;n Om 2!!z (\")-\u0026lt; er,~\nj r- .,..\n\":o\".S On C\u0026gt; C: ~\n:o !l::\n:o m~ ~ ~ .\nI: \u0026gt;\" mC\u0026gt; -z z er, o-\u0026lt; \u0026gt;\" Personnel Changes Page 8 June 24, 2004 NAME Stewart, Marcus Reason: None Given Wal ton, Coretta Reason: Accepted Another Position Weston, Ophelia Reason: Personal Woods, Teresa Reason: Abandonment Akins, James Benton, Jimmie Coats, Wanda Compton, Jerry POSITION SCHOOL Care CARE Child Nutrition FAJR Clerical FOREST HGTS. Child Nutrition HALL START DATE END DATE 9-29-03 4-1-04 2-14-03 5-12-04 8-18-92 5-24-04 11-3-03 4-29-04 SALARY CLASS 1-02 CARE 3-01 FSH550 39-12 CLK10 3-01 FSH550 ew Non-Certified Employees Custodian 5-6-04 1-01 BRADY CUS925 Custodian 5-3-04 1-05 BASELINE CUS928 Care 4-29-04 4-01 CARE CARE Custodian 5-24-04 54-12 FACILITY SERV. ADN12 ANNUAL SALARY 6.48 8364.00 23304.00 8364.00 5313.00 annual 519.75 prorated 12363.00 annual 1343.00 prorated 6.25 36456.00 annual 3937.25 prorated Personnel Changes Page 9 June 24, 2004 NAME Fairmon, Toney Foote, William Fresh, Andrea Hayman, Tera McGee, Effie Mohammed, Abdullah POSITION SCHOOL Custodian SOUTHWEST Custodian PARK.VIEW Parent Coor. SOUTHWEST Media Clerk MANN Custodain CENTRAL Custodian MANN START DATE END DATE 5-12-04 5-13-04 5-3-04 5-3-04 5-4-04 5-10-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS12 1-01 CUS928 50-02 SOWRK 31-07 CLK925 1-01 CUS12 1-01 CUS928 ANNUAL SALARY 13784.00 annual 2052.94 prorated 10,626.00 annual 750.75 prorated 24012.00 annual 2501.25 prorated 15804.00 annual 420.32 prorated 13784.00 annual 2287.56 prorated 10626.00 annual 924.00 prorated !IC mn .z... .. , Om\nice -m .~.,,~...\n,c Cl 8~ ~z ii: .... CJ) .,,. ~~ z  C: a, \u0026gt;c: r-u, !!lz :cm 8g: ,...~ m\n,c r-s ~C') -\u0026lt;m 6(/) z :ca, i5 ~ :co :!: C: CJ). -\u0026lt;n Om\n!:!z C')-t CJ)~\njr- .,,. -\n,ca.s On Cl c: ~\n,c i:\n,c m~\nj\n:r- ,... C: . i: \u0026gt; po mCl -z ZCJ\u0026gt; c-t \u0026gt; \" Personnel Changes Page 10 June 241 2004 '..:4n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" NAME Palmer, Gladys POSITION SCHOOL Custodian CENTRAL START DATE END DATE 3-21-04 Reclassification SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS928 ANNUAL SALARY 10626.00 annual 2425.50 prorated Browning, Benita Bookkeeper Financial Services From Grade 55 to Grade 57 NONE NONE Non-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer 810 WI. Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" June 24, 2004 To: LRSD Board of Directors From: Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent ~ Prepared by~ Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Bargaining Rights ofLRSD Paraprofessionals and Custodians The Administration and LRCT A have agreed to the attached conditions with regard to the bargaining rights of the LRSD Paraprofessionals and Custodians effective June 18, 2004. 810 \\\\'. 1arkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  w,vw.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-44~-1001 31: mz.... .o. , Om 2!!0 zm ,C,\u0026gt; ~,....\n,o C\u0026gt; 8~ ~z :1:\"\"' (J) :C CD c:5 :c 31: :cO -C:: (J). --\u0026lt;o Om\nDz 0--\u0026lt; !S ~ m AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LRCTA AND THE LRSD ADMINISTRATION REGARDING THE BARGAINING RIGHTS OF LRSD PARAPROFESSIONALS AND CUSTODIANS June 18, 2004 The Administration and the Association agree to the following approach to dealing with the current crisis surrounding the bargaining rights of the Little Rock School District paraprofessionals and custodians: 1. Both groups will receive, for the 04-05 school year, the 10% raise and the negotiated increase in the District's share of the insurance coverage. 2. The Association, acknowledging that a number of factors have resulted in both paraprofessionals and custodians falling short of the number necessary for the CTA to represent a majority of the employees in each group, agrees to forgo bargaining for the 2004- 05 school year. 3. The Administration will initiate two changes to the current agreement. These changes constitute the removal of the building engineers from the custodial bargaining unit and the placement of the paraprofessionals and the custodians on the LRSD Master Salary Schedule. 4. While no longer bound by the negotiated agreements covering the paraprofessionals and custodians, the Administration, whenever possible, with comply with the general spirit of the employment and working conditions outlined in those agreements until July 1, 2005. 5. Employee disputes will be handled in a manner consistent with Arkansas State Law 6-17-208 and the LRSD employee Handbook. 6. If the Association meets the verification terms outlined in the Recognition clause of the Paraprofessional contract by January 15 of 2005, the Administration will immediately honor the terms and conditions of that contact. 7. If the Association meets the verification terms outlined in the Recognition clause of the Custodial contract by January 15 of 2005, the Administration will immediately honor the terms and conditions of that contact. Katherine Wright LRCT A President // 0 ~ / /~91 Jc Grainger Ledbetter LRCT A Executive Director Dr. Morris Holmes LRSD Superintendent u~ BeverlyJliams Human Resources Director - ---- ([  -......~~, '.:An Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" June 24, 2004 To: LRSD Board of Directors From: Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared byf tfeverly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Hiring of Additional Teaching Staff The Division of School Services has requested the addition of forty-three and four tenths ( 43.4) new teaching staff members, plus the potential of an additional nineteen (19) new pre-K classrooms. 12 Elementary ( From allocations) 5 Elementary (To undo split classrooms) 26.4 Secondary ( Program needs at five different secondary schools) 19 Approximate number of Pre-K Early Childhood (Grant proposal from the state with regard to additional funding of early childhood progran1s. The District will proceed with only the number of classrooms funded by the grant.) 62.4 Total - Potential new teaching positions School Services, Student Registration, and the Human Resources Department will continue to monitor the student enrollments, grant awards, and programs to implement those positions necessary for a successful 2004-05 school year. The administration is recommending approval to proceed with the hiring and staffing of these positions prior to the approval of the Little Rock School District budget for 2004- 05. 810 \\'( i\\Iarkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72.201  \\\\\"-vw.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 Im: n .z... .. , Om ,!!O zm C) ~ \"1:lr\n, o C) 8~ ~z I: .... \"' .,,. \u0026gt;s ~:- c: CD ,\u0026gt;.. ..C.,,: !/lz ::i:m 8g: .... ~ m\n,o J\n~ ngemn z % CD c:5  % I: %0 \"- ' C.: .... n Om\n,oz 0 .... ~~ m TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 SOUTH PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 June 24, 2004 Board of Directors Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Dr. Ed Williams, Statistician Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Program Evaluation Agenda for 2004-05 Short Summary-The Board is asked to approve the continued program evaluations for the broad areas of Elementary Literacy (K-5), Secondary Literacy (6-12), Elementary Mathematics (K-5), and Secondary Mathematics (6-12). The evaluation format for these programs will be standardized to the extent possible so that all of these programs can be evaluated on an annual basis with an added section each year that incorporates the latest student assessment data. In addition English as a Second Language (K-12) and the Pre-Kindergarten Program are proposed to complete the Program Evaluation Agenda for 2004-05. The primary research question will be, \"Was the program effective in improving the achievement of African-American students?\" (or Limited English Proficient students in the case of the ESL Evaluation). Individual components of the broad programs will be included in the program evaluations when feasible. Budget for external program evaluators and a Director of Planning, Research, and Evaluation and an Evaluation Specialist are proposed in the 2004-05 budget. Objectives- to improve the education for all students, with a focus on African-American students, by evaluating selected programs (and their components when feasible) each year to determine their impact on student achievement. Expected Outcomes- Programs will be maintained, adjusted, or eliminated based on the findings of program evaluations over a sufficient period of time to determine the effectiveness of the program. Population- District staff and teachers will be involved in the evaluations, in addition to an external evaluator(s). Budget Amount/Source of Budget- Staff members' time and materials are included as a part of the regular operating budget for the Math/Science and Literacy Departments. External  ~onsultants will be contracted to help develop the evaluation design, write the reports, and ensure impartial findings and recommendations. A budget of $50,000 is included in the proposed PRE !mI: n .z... ., , Om ,!!C zm C.,\u0026gt;,, .~...\n:o C\u0026gt; 8~ ~z :I: .... CJ\u0026gt; fl 8 z ~ cz5 CJ\u0026gt; TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 SOUTH PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 June 24, 2004 Board of Directors Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Dr. Ed Williams, Statistician Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Program Evaluation Agenda for 2004-05 Short Summary-The Board is asked to approve the continued program evaluations for the broad areas of Elementary Literacy (K-5), Secondary Literacy ( 6-12), Elementary Mathematics (K-5), and Secondary Mathematics (6-12). The evaluation format for these programs will be standardized to the extent possible so that all of these programs can be evaluated on an annual basis with an added section each year that incorporates the latest student assessment data. In addition English as a Second Language (K-12) and the Pre-Kindergarten Program are proposed to complete the Program Evaluation Agenda for 2004-05. The primary research question will be, \"Was the program effective in improving the achievement of African-American students?\" (or Limited English Proficient students in the case of the ESL Evaluation). Individual components of the broad programs will be included in the program evaluations when feasible. Budget for external program evaluators and a Director of Planning, Research, and Evaluation and an Evaluation Specialist are proposed in the 2004-05 budget. Objectives- to improve the education for all students, with a focus on African-American students, by evaluating selected programs (and their components when feasible) each year to determine their impact on student achievement. Expected Outcomes- Programs will be maintained, adjusted, or eliminated based on the findings of program evaluations over a sufficient period of time to determine the effectiveness of the program. Population- District staff and teachers will be involved in the evaluations, in addition to an external evaluator(s). Budget Amount/Source of Budget- Staff members' time and materials are included as a part of the regular operating budget for the Math/Science and Literacy Departments. External  ~onsultants will be contracted to help develop the evaluation design, write the reports, and ensure impartial findings and recommendations. A budget of$50,000 is included in the proposed PRE !D n 0 z U\u0026gt; .... ~~ n-\u0026lt; m=:i U\u0026gt; ~ :zc 0 8 -\u0026lt; ii: zm.... .n. , Om ,!!O zm .G,,,)..~..\n,:, G) 8~ ~z :1: .... U\u0026gt; :ca, G'i . :c !I: :c 0 - C: ~n Om\n,:,z c\"\u0026gt;-\u0026lt; !S ~ m p 8 z ~ 0z U\u0026gt; budget and an increase of $50,000 is sought to bring the total to $100,000. Future program evaluations will require the continued assistance of external consultant(s) along with greater internal capacity to conduct program evaluations. Two additional staff members with program evaluation expertise will be needed. The two positions will be a Director of the Department and an Evaluation Specialist. $183,475 is included in the proposed 2004-05 budget for salary and fringes for these two positions. Manager-Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Instruction Duration-The formal program evaluations of the elementary literacy program, secondary literacy program, and elementary and secondary mathematics (and science) program began during the 2002-03 school year and was continued in the Board's Evaluation Agenda for 2003- 04 school year. Additional assessment data will be available during 2004-05 as the Benchmark Exams expand to included grades 3-8. The reports to the Board on the 2003-04 evaluations will be provided this October. Continued evaluations of literacy and mathematics will continue for the next few years as additional data is gathered. The Little Rock Reading First Project was also on the Board's Evaluation Agenda for 2003-04 and that report should be available this fall. The LRSD Reading First Project will continue, at a minimum, for the three years of the grant period and will be included as a component within the elementary literacy program evaluation, starting with the proposed 2004-05 Program Evaluation Agenda. Reports on the programs identified for evaluation on the Board's 2004-05 Agenda will be finished and reports made in the fall of 2005. Long Range/Continuation-all program evaluations are used as a benchmark for program planning in future years. The formal literacy and mathematics evaluations will be recommended for continuation each year into the foreseeable future. The ESL and Pre-K evaluations will conclude at the end of the 2004-05 school year but may be continued if desired by the Board. Other Agencies Involved-The Arkansas Department of Education is involved in the LRSD Reading First component of the elementary literacy program evaluation. The Division of Child Care, which is part of the Department of Human Services, will be involved in using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) to externally assess the Pre-K classrooms. ECERS will be used as a component of the Pre-K Program Evaluation. Expectations of Staff-Staff members from literacy, math, and English as a Second Language will serve on the evaluation teams for these program evaluations. Program evaluation is embedded in the job expectations of staff\nconsequently, this is an ongoing commitment for our staff. Needed Staff-External Program Evaluator(s) will be contracted to assist with the evaluations. Future program evaluations will require the continued assistance of external consultant(s), and the employment of two additional staff members with program evaluation expertise. The two positions will be a Director of the Department and an Evaluation Specialist. Comments-the program evaluation agenda as proposed includes the core curricular areas of literacy and math. Literacy and math are currently part of the high stakes testing programs required by NCLB. ESL is an area that was under supervision by the Office of Civil Rights until the district was released this past year. Continued evaluation of the program is recommended because LEP students are a sub-group under \"No Child Left Behind\" and because a new assessment was initiated this spring (Maculaitis Assessment of Competencies or MAC II) along with portfolio assessment. Pre-Kindergarten expansion is currently a major emphasis for LRSD. Evaluation of our structure for Pre-K expansion is important to guiding the development of the Pre-K Program in the future. Recommendations-we recommend approval of the six programs for program evaluation during the 2004-05 school year. !II (\") 0z 1/) ..... m~ ~!::l hl~ 1/) (\") :z:c 0 8 -\u0026lt; ~ mz n ..... .., Om iz!!mC C) ~ \"ti .....\n,a C) 8~ ~z ~ ..... 1/) % ID c:\n %~ ::cO - C: II)  ..... (\") Om\n,oz c')-, !S ~ m p 8 z ?\ncz5 1/) Action Plan Timeline for Board Approved Evaluation Agenda: School 2004-2005 Month Action May2004 Program evaluations for SY2004-2005 determined. June Board approves SY2004-2005 evaluation agenda. Staff teams assigned for each evaluation. July RFP for external consultant(s) developed and advertised. Benchmark and End-of-Course exam data arrives. August Contract for external consultant finalized. Completed staff teams meet to begin the evaluation process per IL-R September Protocol developed to determine level of implementation for programs. Staff teams begin preliminary analysis of achievement data. October Staff teams trained on implementation protocol. Begin collecting implementation data. Preliminary analysis of achievement data completed November - January 2005 Staff teams meet monthly to monitor adherence to IL-R February Implementation data completed. March Analysis of all data completed. April Draft reports completed. May Evaluation for SY2004-2005 reports finalized. Programs for SY2005-2006 evaluation determined. June SY2004-2005 reports presented to Board. Evaluation agenda for SY 2005-2006 approved by the Board. Staff teams assigned for each SY2005-2006 evaluation. External RFP External consultants are to provide planning support, interpretation, and technical writing of research results for one or all of the following program evaluations: 1. Elementary Literacy (K-5) 2. Secondary Literacy (6-12) 3. Elementary Mathematics (K-5) 4. Secondary Mathematics ( 6-12) 5. English as a Second Language (ESL) 6. Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K) Essential duties include the following: 0 Provide research planning support 0 Analyze and interpret achievement and other statistical data  Compile and write evaluation reports. 0 Implement the assigned portions of the Little Rock School District's (LRSD) program evaluation regulations Education and experience A minimum of at least a program emphasis (a terminal degree is preferred), or a record of working in the field of the aforementioned programs. Evidence of knowledge and experience in technical writing and research within the areas of Elementary and Secondary Mathematics and/or Literacy, English as a Second Language, and PreKindergarten. Description of Work Over an 11-month time period, August 2004 - June 2005, the external consultant will work with LRSD staff teams to plan and implement the District's Board approved evaluation agenda. The external consultant will meet a least monthly with the staff teams to establish research questions, determine the data needed and how to gather the data, and to analyze and interpret the data. In addition, the external consultant will be the lead writer of the evaluation reports, submit these reports to the staff teams and other District personnel for peer review, and complete the final reports.\ns:: mz.... .n. , Om j!!O zm .G.,',\u0026gt;...~.\n,o G'\u0026gt; 8~ ~z\ns:: .... u, ::,:: a, ci. ::,:: :I: ::,::0 - C: !!le-, Om \"0'-zt u,~\n:\njr-f\u0026gt; 8 z ~ cz5 u, Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 DATE: TO: June 24, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director of Technology and Media Services THROUGH: Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Contract for Technology Services Subject Recommendation for Contract for Technology Services for 2004-2005 Summary Due to the increasing complexity of the E-Rate process, the fact that the District is now in the appeal process for most 2003-2004 applications, and the fact that we are funded for 8 additional schools with media retrieval systems, there is a need for technical assistance with these projects. Staff is recommending a contract with Sharon Dowdy for $78,000 plus travel for the 2004-2005 school year for services related to these projects. Objectives To provide expertise in acquiring funds available from the federal E-Rate program To provide expertise in the appeal process for funds that have been denied. To manage the installation of media retrieval systems in 8 LRSD schools Expected Outcomes To continue to implement the approved technology plan Budget Amount Source of Budget Manager Duration Long Range/Continuation Comments $78,000 + travel Dedicated millage technology funds Lucy Neal July 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005 N/A The District formerly had contracts with A TS\u0026amp;R and with EDS for technology services. During the 2003-2004 school year the District contracted with EDS for the amount of $146,000. Sharon Dowdy, formerly with EDS, was project manager for the EDS contract from 2000-2004. She is now available to contract directly with the District. A Scope of Work is provided in a separate document. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve a contrc~ct with Sharon Dowdy in the amount of $78,000 + travel for technology services for the 2004-2005 school year. Im: n z.... .. , Om 2!!C zm C) ~ -0 ,\nx, C) 8~ ~z I: .... U\u0026gt; ::ca, i5 . ::c I: :-:\u0026lt;cO= U\u0026gt;  \"\"'n Om :nz c5 .... !S ~ m E-rate Technology Services Scope of Work Sharon Dowdy, Consultant 2004-2005  Advise on types ofE-rate filings that would benefit LRSD  Prepare all E-rate applications and submit to LRSD for review  Research and prepare documentation related to E-rate applications  Organize documentation for all E-rate related applications  Research and prepare correspondence related to E-rate Program Integrity and Selective Review requests  Research and prepare appeal documents  Do background research on FCC rules and orders related to E-rate Media Retrieval Projects  Act as project manager for implementation of Safari system at 8 new sites  Plan and facilitate regular meetings with project personnel including both LRSD staff and vendor team  Create implementation timelines for each site working with vendor and LRSD construction managers  Assist in preparation of materials lists and purchase orders for the systems  Walk schools with vendor and LRSD construction managers to determine locations and technical needs of head end rooms  Communicate with principals on all aspects of project implementation  Coordinate implementation schedule with vendor and LRSD construction managers  Monitor progress of implementation schedule and notify LRSD of any problems  Manage budget for project  Work with vendor on content of training sessions  Coordinate training schedule with principals and staff  Monitor training sessions Other  Develop technology-related RFP's in conjunction with LRSD Procurement staff  Assist in evaluation of technology-related RFP's  Participate in Technology Committee meetings  Update LRSD Technology Plan as needed When travel expenses are paid by Little Rock School District, the consultant will work exclusively on LRSD projects. Date: To: From: Prepared by: Subject: Summary: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 June 24, 2004 Board of Education Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Linda Austin, Director, Planning and Development Debbie Milam, Director, Volunteers in Public Schools Federal grant submission: Mentoring Programs The District proposes to submit a Mentoring Program grant application to implement a school-based mentoring program for children with greatest needs in the 4th through 8th grades. The government defines greatest need as those students who: (i) are at risk of educational failure or dropping out of school, (ii) are involved in criminal, delinquent, or gang activities\nor (iii) lack strong, positive role models. The program is designed to assist these children in receiving support and guidance from a mentor\nimprove academic performance\nimprove interpersonal relationships between the children and their peers\nreduce the dropout rate\nand reduce juvenile delinquency and involvement in gangs. The deadline for application is July rth. The grant period is September 2004- August 2007 Objectives: The LRSD Mentoring Program proposal includes three objectives: 1) The percentage of student/mentor matches that are sustained for a period of twelve months will increase: 0% by 2005\n25% by 2006\nand 50% by 2007. 2) The percentage of mentored students who demonstrate improvement in core academic subjects as measured by grade point average after 12 months will increase: 5% by 2005\n15% by 2006\nand 30% by 2007. 3) The percentage of mentored students who have unexcused absences from school will decrease: 10% by 2005\n.30% by 2006\nand 40% by 2007. Budget amount: $600,000\nno match required ~ 0 r- 0 \"z' C\u0026gt; :x, m ! \"\"'' ::C ID G'i ' ::c:I: ::r:O !- !lC. : on :x,m 0~ ens\\?\nl r-p 8 z ?\n0z \"' ., '.\n4.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" June 24, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED B~ark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services SUBJECT: Proposed Budget for Annual School Election In order to satisfy various legal requirements concerning school elections, budget publication, and school tax rates, the Board of Directors must approve a proposed budget for the 2005-2006 school year together with a rate of tax levy sufficient to provide such funds. The requirement for publication of the budget shall be discharged by the board of directors of each school district by publication of its budget one (1) time ... not less than sixty (60) days before the annual school election. (Ark. Code Ann.  6-13-622) It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the proposed budget of expenditures and tax levy for 2005-2006 as attached for publication in accordance with State law. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 !.=.,' z z\u0026gt; n\n!! en ~ ,n- 0 en z C\u0026gt; Rl ~\no\nen ?\u0026lt; ~c:: 0 :,,.m n......z.... ~o z~ z~ \u0026gt; ~ % a, i:'i. :z::IC :z:O -C:: e..n..,n Om \"\u0026lt;'5'..z.., gi ~ m p g z ~\nen PROPOSED BUDGET OF EXPENDITURES TOGETHER WITH TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2005, TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 30, 2006 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District No. 60-01 of Pulaski County, Arkansas in compliance with the requirements of Amendments No. 40 and No. 74 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas and of Arkansas Code Ann.  6- 13-622 (1993 Rep!.) has prepared, approved, and hereby makes public the proposed budget of expenditures together with a supporting tax rate as follows: 1. Salary Fund Expenditures 2. Instructional Expense 3. Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Expense 4. Pupil Transportation Expense 5. Other Operating Expense 6. Non-bonded Debt Payment 7. Bonded Debt Payment 8. Building Fund Expense 9. Dedicated Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation $ 94,516,380.00 $ 24,885,682.00 $ 14,325,390.00 $ 13,842,581.00 $ 35,563,661.00 $ 675,000.00 $ 12,439,607.00 $ 10,000,000.00 $ 4,500,000.00 The total tax levy proposed includes 32.0 mills for the maintenance and operation of schools, 12.4 mills for debt service previously voted as a continuing levy pledged for the retirement of existing bonded indebtedness, and 2.0 mills for current expenditures/dedicated maintenance and operation expenditures. Surplus revenues produced each year by debt service millage may be used by the District for other purposes. The total proposed rate includes the uniform rate of tax to be collected on all taxable property in the State and remitted to the State Treasurer pursuant to Amendment No. 74 to the Arkansas Constitution to be used solely for maintenance and operation of schools in this District. The proposed rate includes no increases. Given this 24th day of June, 2004. Little Rock School District No. 60-01 of Pulaski County Tony Rose, President Micheal Daugherty, Secretary H:ICFHUGHE\\ElectJon\\Elect1onBudget2004.doc '.\n4n Individual Approach to a World ef Knowledge\" DATE: June 24th . 2004 TO: ~[Directors FROM: ~~irector ofFacility Services THROUGH~ Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding, Protection of Historic Resources and Cultural Landscape The Little Rock School District is proud to report that it has become a signatory to an agreement between various agencies with the intended purpose of a mutual understanding of the importance of historic resources and the cultural landscape within and surrounding Little Rock Central High School Historic site, and to mutually commit to strive for the long-term protection of said resources. The U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service, The Little Rock School District, City of Little Rock, and the Central High Neighborhood, Inc agreed to the Memorandum of Understanding. This agreement, coordinated by Mr. Mike Madel!, Superintendent Central High National Historic Site, is the result of mutual caring and respect for the National Site, surrounding neighborhood and the desire for cooperation in the preservation and development of this portion of the City of Little Rock. 810 W. 1arkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 ?\u0026lt; u...., C: 0 :,..m .o....z... ~o Zi1j ,z~.. ~ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Agreement Number 87310040001 Page 1 of 6 PROTECTION OF HISTORIC RESOURCES AND CULTURAL LANDSCAPE Memorandum of Understanding Between The United States Department of the Interior National Park Service, City of Little Rock, Little Rock School District, and the Central High Neighborhood, Inc. This Agreement is entered into by and between the National Park Service (NPS), United States Department of the Interior, acting through the Superintendent of Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site, the City of Little Rock (\"the city\"), acting through the Mayor, the Little Rock School District (LRSD), acting through the Superintendent of Schools, and the Central High Neighborhood, Incorporated (CHNI), acting through its President. ARTICLE I - OBJECTIVES The objectives of this Agreement are to affirm a mutual understanding of the importance of historic resources and the cultural landscape within and surrounding Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site, and to mutually commit to strive for the long-term protection of said resources and landscape. ARTICLE II - BACKGROUND Little Rock Central High School is listed on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A (because of its association with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of American history) and Criterion G (because it achieved significance within the previous 50 years). In 1982 the Secretary of the Interior designated the school as a national historic landmark. The period of significance for the High School, as is listed on the National Register of Historic Places nomination form, is 1954-1959. In 1998, President Clinton signed Public Law 105-356, designating the school and certain adjacent properties as Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site (hereinafter \"the historic site\"). The purpose of the historic site, as specified in the law, is \" ... to preserve, protect, and interpret for the benefit, education, and inspiration of present and future generations, Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, and its role in the integration of public schools and the development of the Civil Rights movement in the United States.\" Section 2.(b) of the law further states, \"Nothing in this Act shall affect the authority of the Little Rock School District to administer Little Rock Central High School nor shall this Act affect the authorities of the City of Little Rock in the neighborhood surrounding the school.\" A National Park Service Cultural Landscape Inventory completed in 1999 determined that the School's cultural landscape also is nationally significant under National Register of Historic Places Criteria A (because of its association with events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of American history) and Criteria C (distinctive characteristics of a period and possesses high artistic values). Agreement Number G7310040001 Page 2 of 6 This historic site is managed under a NPS General Management Plan (GMP), which was approved on July 30, 2002. Pursuant to Public Law 105-356, the GMP sets forth a management framework that ensures the administration of the historic site does not interfere with the continuing use of Central High School as an educational institution. Among many other principles, the GMP states: 1. \"The [NPS] will work cooperatively with the Little Rock School District to develop a preservation plan/policy for the building and grounds of the entire 21-acre school campus that is amenable to the school district.\" 2. \"The [NPS] will work with city agencies to develop preservation strategies for protecting the documented architectural and cultural landscape values of the high school's surrounding neighborhood.\" 3. \"Partnerships will be established with the Central High Neighborhood Association to assist with development of neighborhood preservation initiatives.\" The city, the LRSD, and the CHNI all are on record as supporting the GMP. This Agreement will serve as the initial step towards achieving the principles stated above. ARTICLE Ill-AUTHORITY The authority for this Agreement is 16 U.S. C. 1-3. ARTICLE IV - STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT The parties to this Agreement recognize that Central High School is an active educational institution that must be maintained and adapted to continue to serve the community. Similarly, the parties recognize that the neighborhoods surrounding the historic site are living communities that also must be maintained and allowed to adapt to remain viable. Th~ parties acknowledge that visitation to the historic site will continue to grow. This increased use, Which is projected to reach more than 56,000 annual visits by 2007, has potential to impact public infrastructure in the neighborhoods surrounding Central High School, possibly necessitating repairs or improvements to the infrastructure. T.he parties affirm that Central High School and the surrounding cultural landscape are nationally sign1f1cant resources deserving of special protection measures. Given the above facts, the parties agree that the historic character and features of the high school and the cultural landscape of the school campus and surrounding neighborhood must be preserved and, Wh~n practical, restored to reflect the appearance of the school and the landscape during its historic Period of significance (1954-1959). The parties further acknowledge that most property in the surrounding neighborhoods is privately owned. Under current zoning the city can encourage, but not compel , private property owners to adhere to this goal. For the purposes of this agreement, the cultural la_ndscape shall be defined as the school campus and all areas within one block of the National Historic Site (as depicted in green on the attached map). ?\u0026lt; ~ C: C \u0026gt;m o....z.. ~~ n\ni2 z \u0026gt; ~ ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; l:: 0 C: ~ :I: m z.. . fl g z ~ 0z \"' ARTICLE V - STATEMENT OF WORK A. All Parties will: Agreement Number G7310040001 Page 3 of 6 1. Strive to maintain and/or restore a high level of historic integrity for Central High School, the school campus, and the surrounding cultural landscape that reflect the resources' period of historical significance (1954-1959). 2. Strive to identify innovative solutions to challenges associated with increased tourism and neighborhood revitalization (such as traffic flow, public transportation, parking, and pedestrian safety) that help promote the attractiveness of the neighborhoods surrounding the historic site as a place to live, work, and recreate. 3. In planning any project that might alter the historic integrity of Central High School, the school campus, or the surrounding cultural landscape, provide early opportunity for all other parties that are signatories to this Agreement to review and offer input about the project. 4. Participate in a semi-annual meeting to update other parties on the current status of projects (planned or in progress) that could affect the historic integrity of the school or the cultural landscape. 5. Participate in other meetings that might be called, as necessary or desirable, to discuss projects that merit additional discussion or that begin to emerge between semi-annual meetings. 6. Participate in development of cultural landscape management guidelines which will provide more specific guidance to all parties on key features of the school, the campus, and the neighborhood that should be preserved or restored. 7. In developing the cultural landscape management guidelines, strive to optimize consistency with the guidelines and requirements set forth in the Centennial Neighborhoods Design Overlay District (CNDOD), provided that the CNDOD guidelines and regulations, (a) are approved by the city, and (b) do not encourage or require measures that would be inconsistent with the preservation or restoration of the cultural landscape to its period of historic significance. 8. Work together to identify programs and funding sources to assist private property owners in their efforts to preserve and restore homes and businesses in a fashion that will be consistent with the cultural landscape's period of significance\nwork to disseminate information about such programs to homeowners and business people. B. The National Park Service will: 1. Serve as lead agency and provide principal staff (or contractor) for development of cultural landscape management guidelines as funding becomes available. Ensure that request for NPS funding of the guidelines is assigned a high park priority ranking. 2. Provide technical assistance on historic preservation and restoration techniques that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 3. Coordinate involvement, as necessary, between the parties and the Arkansas State Historic Preservation Officer and the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation. Agreement Number G7310040001 Page 4 of 6 4. Provide any necessary clerical or logistical support that may be necessary to facilitate the semiannual meetings discussed in Article V, Section A.1 (including recording and distribution of meeting minutes). 5. Provide a summary of input received from other parties on NPS projects, including a summary of unresolved issues (if any), to NPS decision makers (including, as appropriate, the Superintendent of the historic site, the Regional Director of the NPS Midwest Region, and/or the NPS Design Advisory Board). C. The City of Little Rock will: 1. Host one of the semi-annual meetings discussed in Article V, Section A.1 . 2. Provide a summary of input received from other parties on NPS projects, including a summary of unresolved issues (if any), to City decision makers (including, as appropriate, the City Board of Directors or the Planning Commission). 3. Encourage private property owners within the cultural landscape to voluntarily maintain or restore their homes to reflect an appearance consistent with the period of significance for the landscape (1954-1959). D. The Little Rock School District will: 1. Host one of the semi-annual meetings discussed in Article V, Section A.1 . 2. Provide a summary of input received from other parties on NPS projects, including a summary of unresolved issues (if any), to District decision makers (including , as appropriate, Central High School administrators or the Board of Education). E. The Central High Neighborhood Association will: 1. Assist in ensuring that neighborhood residents are aware of and engaged, as appropriate, in matters that the parties to this Agreement are considering. 2. Provide a summary of input received from other parties on NPS projects, including a summary of unresolved issues (if any), to Association decision makers (including, as appropriate, Association officers or the Board of Directors). 3. Participate actively in planning and review activities related to the historic site and cultural landscape. ARTICLE Vi - TERM OF AGREEMENT ~his _Agreement will be effective for a period of five years from the date of final signature, unless it is errninated earlier by one of the parties pursuant to Article VIII that follows. ARTICLE VII - KEY OFFICIALS A. Key official are essential to ensure maximum coordination and communication between the parties and for the work being performed. They are: 1. For the NPS Superintendent Little Rock Central High School Nat. Hist. Site 700 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3527 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 E-mail: michael_madell@nps.gov Telephone: (501) 374-3067 Facsimile: (501) 301-7762 2. For the City City Manager City of Little Rock 500 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 E-mail: bmoore@littlerock.state.ar.us Telephone: (501) 371-4510 Facsimile: (501) 371-4498 3. For the LRSD Agreement Number G7310040001 Page 5 of 6 Director of Facility Services Little Rock School District 3601 South Bryant Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 E-mail: douglas.eaton@lrsd.org Telephone: (501) 447-5281 Facsimile: (501) 447-5251 4. For the CHNI President Central High Neighborhood Association 1514 South Schiller Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Telephone: (501) 375-1829 B. Communications - All parties will copy all other parties on any communication regarding this agreement. C. Changes in Key Officials - Any permanent change in key officials will be made only by modification to this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII - MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. This Agreement may be modified only by a written instrument executed by the parties. B. Any party may terminate this Agreement by providing the other parties with thirty (30) days advance written notice. In the event that one party provides the other parties with notice of its intention to terminate, the parties will meet promptly to discuss the reasons for the notice. ARTICLE IX- STANDARD CLAUSE - CIVIL RIGHTS During the performance of this Agreement, the participants will not discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin , or disability. ARTICLE X - SIGNATURES Agreement Number 87310040001 Page 6 of 6 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below. FOR THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE: Signature: Name: R. Michael Madell Title: Superintendent Date: FOR THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK: Signature: Name: Bruce T. Moore Title: City Manager Date: FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT: Signature: Name: Dr. Morris Holmes Title: Interim Superintendent Date: FOR THE CENTRAL HIGH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: Signature: Name: Ethel Ambrose Title: President Date: ?\u0026lt; ~ C: .o\u0026gt;..m.zC.. ~~ 0\n!i z \u0026gt; ~ ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; C \u0026lt;- 0 C: ~ ~ ~ _J LJUUULJLJ - \" - Boundary of National Historic Site --- Boundary of National Historic Landmark W utt1r, Rocf Cemra, '\"i1qr, Schoo1 1' ::,01~oe-s LJ.-uc bbJrc Q: \\/1s1cn .. -E:nle f1v1a9r-to11F ,v,ooi ::,e~!IC'2 Station, {\n) vac,rn ,_o ~ ,.:\nomrnemoranve Garoer {I, Qu191e1 3tad1urr   Sf.te r~rr.a1p , u tie nm:k ~entra~ High scnoob Nationa, Historic SitB United States Department of the Interior  National Park Service DSC  037  20007  AUG 2001 DATE: TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 June 24, 2004 Board of Education FROM: /j(arral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: School!De12artment Item Donor Brady Elementary A check in the amount Bank of the Ozarks School of$1,000.00 to purchase trophies and ribbons for the Science Fair Awards Program Central High School $300.00 cash to be Marilyn Marshall applied toward a scholarship to benefit Meleknur Asian Central High School Services, valued at Mike and Che Dolan $2,228.22, to the of Pro Pies of AR Central High Jazz Band Cloverdale Magnet Coke products, valued The Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Middle School at $500.00, to provide refreshments at parent and faculty meetings, special programs and student activities Cloverdale Magnet $450.00 cash for 11 sixth Wal-Mart/Baseline ($400.00) Middle School grade honor roll students, Ida Pettus\" Kid Smart ($50.00) all with perfect attendance and good behavior, to begin savings accounts for college ~ C') r- 0 !z!? C\u0026gt; i UI ?\u0026lt; U--I, C: 0 n\u0026gt;mz _,--, c5 0 z~ '6 r- z ),,\n,:, -\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; ),, 0 \u0026lt;- 0 C: ~ :I:: mz --, Board of Education June 24, 2004 Page 2 School/Department Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Fair Park Elementary School Forest Heights Middle School Geyer Springs Elementary School Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Middle School Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Middle School Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Middle School HP Computer System and printer, Canon scanner and a computer desk, valued at $1,000.00 Teaching materials, art supplies and children's books, valued at $700.00, to be used by young teachers starting their careers $500.00 cash to FHMS Athletic Department to sponsor five (5) students to the U of A Football Camp A \"Children of Promise Foundation Scholarship Fund\" which will guarantee ten 5th grade students a scholarship in the amount of$1,000.00 each. Donation of $10,000 will be made each year thereafter. $2,550.00 cash toward the purchase and lighting of the Henderson School Marque $100.00 cash to be applied toward the purchase and lighting of the Henderson School Marque $250.00 cash to be applied toward the purchase and lighting of the Henderson School Marque Ms. Alice Wickliffe, sixth-grade teacher at CMMS Ms. Sherry Sherwood Convenience Stores Plus, Inc. dba Big Ben Truck Stop BPI/Waste Services of AR in conjunction with the Geyer Springs Neighborhood Association and Geyer Springs Elementary School Henderson PTSA Pennbrook/Cloverhill Property Owners' Association City of LR through Westbrook Neighborhood Association Board of Education June 24, 2004 Page 3 !=' Schoo I/Department Item Donor .., z \u0026gt;z 0 Henderson Health $3,256.00 cash to be Combined School-Wide ,~... en Sciences Magnet Middle applied toward the and PT A Fundraiser School purchase and lighting of the Henderson School Marque Henderson Health $1,000.00 cash to be Match for Foundation Grant for Sciences Magnet Middle applied toward the Student Incentives/Combined ~ School purchase and lighting School-Wide \u0026amp; PT A Fundraiser ,0. .. of the Henderson e0n School Marque z C)\n,o m Henderson Health Second Baptist Church/John Barrow ~ Mulch, valued at $230.00,\n,o\n,,: en Sciences Magnet Middle for the Henderson School Road School Marque Henderson Health Landscape plants and United Way's Day of Caring Sciences Magnet Middle materials, valued at ?\u0026lt; en School approximately $150.00, ..... C 0 for the Henderson School :,,.m o......z.... Marque i5 0 z~ :\nMabelvale Magnet ,... Portrait package, valued Wayne Smith Photography z \u0026gt; Middle School at $450.00, donated during\n,o -\u0026lt; the dedication of the \"Carl Martin Library\" at MMMS Mabelvale Magnet Two (2) name plates MMMS Builder's Club Middle School engraved with \"Carl Martin Library\", valued at $78.64 ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; 0 Mabelvale Magnet Refreshments, valued Mabelvale United Methodist c.... 0 C Middle School at $150.00, for the Church ~ :I: Carl Martin Library mz ..... dedication at MMMS Mabelvale Magnet Gift certificate, valued Wal-Mart Supercenter/Baseline Middle School at $25.00, for refreshments for the Carl Martin Library dedication at MMMS Mabelvale Magnet Desk, valued at $50.00, Richard Thompson of Tom James Middle School to the Carl Martin Library ofLR atMMMS Board of Education June 24, 2004 Page 4 School/Department Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Williams Traditional Magnet School Williams Traditional Magnet School Mahlon Martin Professional Library Equipment and labor (two hours), valued at $400.00, for moving columns for the Carl Martin Library at MMMS Books, valued at $100.00, to the Carl Martin Library atMMMS Carnegie columns (priceless) to the Carl Martin Library at MMMS $13,200.00 cash to be distributed as follows: Staff Appreciation: $2,112.00 Classroom Supplies: $6,663.00\nStudent Recognition: $3,950.00 Parental Involvement: $475.00 A \"Drug Free\" banner, valued at $300.00, to the counseling program Five (5) Olympus digital cameras and bags, two (2) each HP Photosmart digital cameras, Olympus deluxe digital imaging kits and picture cards, valued at $2,200.00 Lando Patton Wrecking, Inc. Mollie Martin Wiseman Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Carl Martin Williams Traditional Magnet School PTA Mr. Randy Wilson of Oxford Screen Printing, Inc. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MEMORANDUM Date: June 2, 2004 To: Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: lik v Ada Keown Principal Subject: Donation The Bank of the Ozarks, one of our Partners in Education, has made a contribution in the form of a check numbered 10254 7 and dated May 17, 2004. They have made this contribution in the amount of $1,000.00 to our school for the following:  Trophies and ribbons for our Science Fair Awards Program We are grateful to the Bank of the Ozarks for this generous donation. The donor's mailing address is: Bank of the Ozarks Chenal Parkway \u0026amp; West Markham Little Rock, AR 72211 It is recommended that this cash donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. ,- 1 I Attachment RECEIVED JUN 4 200~. P~ - --~.1\nfNT \"'t:: \\ft ,es: t,1a''7,.~ S 'E-\"''  Phone 150 \\ .1.:,.3900  Fax (501) ,:j7.3901  Little Roel-\n, Arka-is2.s 72205 Litt{e 'Rock Centra{ Jf113fi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Litt[e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 'Pfione 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: 5/10/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: ANCY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL7 }:_~/t~l/4--(__ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Marilyn Marshall of 42 Eagles est Court, Little Rock, AR 72210 graciously contributed $300.00 toward a scholarship to benefit Meleknur Aslan. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED MAY 11 200~ PROCURE rli t rJ T ittfe 'Rock Centra{ JfifJFi Sclioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 'Phone 501-447-1400 ]\"ax 501-447-1401 DATE: MAY 11, 2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATION Mike \u0026amp; Che Dolan of Pro Pies of Arkansas, 8122 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, AR 72227 very generously contributed $2,228.22 in kind services to the Central High Jazz Band. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. ... \"~~ '-,~~~ .. ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; C ls C: s1 I: m z... . CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL To: From: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement Angela M~~ Principal Dates: May 12, 2004 Re: Donation The Coca-Cola Bottling Company donated $500.00 in Coke Products to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School for the 2003-2004 school years. The products were used to supply refreshments at parent meetings, faculty meetings, special programs and student activities. Business Coca-Cola Bottling Company 7000 Hwy I-30 Little Rock, AR 72209 Donation value $500.00 6300 Hinkson Road  Ptione (50') 4.!7-2500  Fax /50 1 ) 447-250-  Little Rock Arkansas 722c9 CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement I ,+ /J\\._ From: Angela Munns, Principal Date: May 10, 2004 Re: Donations A donation of $450.00 was given to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. The donated money was given to eleven 6th grade students to begin saving accounts for college. The students who earned and received the awards had perfect attendance, good behavior and made the honor roll each 9 weeks. Business Wal-Mart Shopping Center 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Ida Pettus' Kid Smart Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Donation $400.00 $50.00 6\"~ 00 H inkson Road  Pnone 1501) 447-250 o  F ax (501) 447  2~i\no ,  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL : Mr. Darral ParadiS-Dir. Of Procurment OM: Ms. Angela Mh~Principal Cloverdale Magnet Middle School DATE: May 28, 2004 RE: Donation from teacher to school Ms. Alice Wickliffe, a 6th grade teacher here, would like to donate a computer system for school use. It consists of the following equipment: 1. Hewlett Packard Monitor SIN THTBE 19703 MIN PI267 A 2. Hewlett Packard CPU SIN MX03 703160 System Num. P1372A 3. Hewlett Packard Printer SIN Mx:0801270 MIN 61 0CL 4. Canon Scanner SIN CZJ107273 MINN650OU 5. Computer desk 6. All necessary cords for connection This has a value of $1,000.000. Please submit this to the Board for approval. Thank you. Ms. Alice Wickliffe 5530 Arthur Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118 6300 Hinkson Road  Phone (501) 447-2500  Fax (501) 447-2501  RECEfs:,1 MAY 2 8 L'.U04 PROCURE fvh:fuT Little Rock. Arkansas 72 209 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis Procurement Dept. I d3 From: Samuel Branch, Principal Fair Park Elementary Date: May 19, 2004 Re: Donation Ms. Sherry Sherwood is donating teaching materials, art supplies, and children's books, valued at $700.00 to Fair Park to be used by young teachers starting their careers. I am recommending the District accept this donation. RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2004 PROCURE rli EfJ T Little Rock Arkansas 72205 ~ C..\".) 0 en z C\"l\n,c m fi\n,c :,\u0026lt;\nen ?\u0026lt; )\u0026gt; ~ 0 c:: sl :I:: m .z.. .. FOREST HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL To: From: Date: RE: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement Elouise J. Hudson 7f' jr' Principal May 27, 2004 Donation Convenience Stores Plus, INC. DBA Big Ben Truck Stop, 3102 W. 34th St., Suite 3, Pine Bluff, AR 71601 , wishes to donate $500.00 to Forest Heights Athletic Department to sponsor 5 students to the University of Arkansas Football Camp. It is recommended this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. ...   ., t\"\":i ,. '  r- ,_ i ! ~  ~ .. -\n. .... 5901 Evergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-2700  Fax (501) 447-2701  Little Rock, Arkansas 72 205 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management From: ~a Hall, Principal @ Geyer Springs Elem. School Date: May 111\\ 2004 Re: Donation BFI, our school's Partner,.. In- Education, working with the Geyer Springs Neighborhood Association, and our school, has graciously and generously set up a \"Children of Promise Foundation Scholarship Fund\", which will guarantee 10 of our students currently in the 5th grade a scholarship. Each student will receive $1000, to be placed in a trust in his or her name, at Metropolitan Bank. BFI will donate a grand total of$10,000, each year for another group of (ten) 5th grade students thereafter, for the purpose of a savings for their education. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. BFI Waste Services of Little Rock Dale Stevener General Manager 1911 West 65th Little Rock, AR 72209 5240 Mabelvale Pike I \" ! /' 1 ,- ~ ._ ,t I J. -.I ... ._, Phone (501) 447-4800 Little Rock. Arkansas 72209 !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n ~ u, ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; C g ~ :I: m .z... . HENDERSON HEALTH SCIENCES MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Marvin Burton, Principal - Henderson Magnet Middle School Date: 5/27/2004 Re: Donation Please accept the following donations to Henderson Middle School. Henderson Magnet Middle received the following donations toward the purchase and lighting of the Henderson Magnet Middle School Marque. Henderson Magnet Middle School PTSA Pennbrook / Cloverhill Property Owners Associaiton City of Little Rock thru Westbrook eighborhood Association Combined School Wide and PTA Fundraiser Match for Foundation Grant for Student Incentives Combined School Wide and PT A Fundraiser Second Baptist - John Barrow (purchased mulch) $2,550.00 100.00 250.00 3,256.00 $6,156.00 1,000.00 230.00 United Way's Day of Caring (landscape plants \u0026amp; materials) Approx. 150.00 Overall Total $7,536.00 RECEIVED 401 Barrow Road  Phone (501) Ll.47-2800  Fax (501) 447-2801  Little Rock. Arkansas iJ MABELVALE M~~m Mmrn m~m To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Ann Blaylocl.\u0026gt;Principal Date: May 20, 2004 Re: Donation Please accept the following donations, which were made during the dedication of the \"Carl Martin Library\" at Mabelvale Magnet Middle School. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Wayne Smith Photography, 8300 Stagecoach Road, L.R., AR 72210 $450.00 Portrait Package-Includes sitting, proofs, \u0026amp; portrait Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Builders Club, 10811 Mabelvale West Road, Mabelvale, AR 72103 Purchased 2 name plates-(1 bronze/1 aluminum) Engraved-Carl Martin Library Value - $78.64 Mabelvale United Methodist Church - (UMW)- 10500 Woodman, Mabelvale, AR 72103 Donated refreshments for dedication - Value $150.00 Wal-Mart Supercenter, 8801 Baseline Rd, Little Rock, AR 72209 Provided gift certificate for refreshments - Value $25.00 Richard Thompson, Tom James of Little Rock, 14 Office Park, Ste. 101, L.R. AR 72211 Donation of Desk-Valued at $50.00 Lando Patton Wrecking, Inc., 8222 Stagecoach Rd., L.R., AR 72210 Moving of columns- 2 hrs. (Equipment \u0026amp; workmen) $400.00 Mollie Martin Wiseman, 5708 C Street, Little Rock, AR 72205 Book Donation - $100.00 Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Carl Martin, 10610 Baseline Road, Little Rock, AR 72209 Donation of \"Carnegie columns\" - priceless REC E i VE D MAY 2 1 200, PROC.U~~~?JT ~ ,n- 0 \"z' C, ~ I \"' ?\u0026lt; \u0026gt; ~ C: ~ !IC m .z.. . WILLIAMS RADITIO 'AL MAGNET SCHOOL A CHOICE FOR EXCELLENCE June 1, 2004 TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: JNV,, Mary Menking, Principal SUBJECT: Donations The Williams Traditional Magnet School PTA has graciously donated $13,200.00 to our school for the following: Staff Appreciation Classroom Supplies Student Recognition Parental Involvement 2,112.00 6,663.00 3,950.00 475.00 Mr. Randy Wilson, Oxford Screen Printing, Inc., 7900 Asher Avenue, Little Rock, Ar. 72204 donated a Drug Free Banner in the amount of $300.00 to our school's counseling program. It is recommended that these donations be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. ECEIVED JUN 4 2004 PRG\"UD,.., ,. - ~ n t L /\nL . .. ~ 7'.:\u0026gt;C' Everg'eer. Stree!  P\"one (50  4..:7.,100  Fax (50 ) 44,--~01  L tie Rock Arkansas 72207 To: From: Through: Subject: Mahlon Martin Professional Library Professional Development Department Instructional Resource Center 3001 South Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 447-3345 May 20, 2004 Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement ~o .Anna Harris, Media Secretary n\\ifn Woods, Coordinator of Professional Development Donation to the Mahlon Martin Professional Library Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (LRCTA) very graciously donated 5 Olympus and 2 hp photosmart digital cameras, 2 Olympus deluxe digital imaging kits, 2 Olympus picture cards, and 5 digital camera bags valued at $2,200.00 to the Mahlon Martin Professional Library. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. r 1 RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2004 .!=.,' ,z.. z 0 i\n: ~ ?\u0026lt; ~ C: ~ :I: m .z.. . DATE: TO: THROUGH: Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 June 24, 2004 Little Rock School District Board of Directors Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY:~Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes  Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending May 31, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District NI A  Needed Staff NIA  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the May 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2003 AND 2004 - APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 05/31/03 COLLECTED 2003/04 05/31/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 9,875,297 123.44% 10,100,000 11 ,812,732 116.96% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 17,610,502 59.90% 29,600,000 17,3 11 ,912 58.49% EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 209,598 112.08% 210,000 199,031 94.78% DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 135,184 75.10% REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 313,397 92.18% 380,000 284,958 74.99% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 190,439 69.25% 200,000 190,480 95.24% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 193,394 120.87% 240,000 195,578 81.49% TOTAL 97,432,000 86,052,153 88.32% 98,607,800 86,017,433 87.23% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 20,836 86.82% 21,000 11 ,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 20,836 86.82% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 48,781,766 88.91% 53,226,139 48,387,399 90.91% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 7,265,757 95.73% 8,300,000 7,127,622 85.87% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 1,272,587 94.97% 1,400,000 1,210,036 86.43% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 1,250,666 73.57% 1,675,000 1,385,206 82.70% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 273,358 100.00% 273,358 273,358 100.00% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 2,453,084 66.57% 3,875,562 2,487,683 64.19% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TOM 3,265,000 3,436,977 105.27% 3,900,000 3,722,338 95.44% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 620,758 61.70% 920,337 693,365 75.34% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 534,979 95.44% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 285,245 100.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 283,224 43.57% 360,000 349,855 97.18% TOTAL 75,441,106 66,582,056 88.26% 74,776,187 66,457,086 88.87% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 226,443 20.11% 1,350,000 220,518 16.33% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 1,109,625 66.67% 1,632,430 1,088,287 66.67% TOTAL 3,410,671 1,336,068 39.17% 3,752,430 1,308,804 34.88% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 153,991,115 87.34% 177,157,418 153,794,918 86.81% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,152,981 17,121,861 68.07% 24,075,790 17,265,045 71.71% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 3,183,037 79.98% 4,000,000 3,567,745 89.19% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 19,472,465 77.68% 24,689,351 18,649,440 75.54% TOTAL 54,198,923 39,777,363 73.39% 52,765,141 39,482,229 74.83% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 193,768,477 84.06% 229,922,559 193,277,147 84.06% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED 2002/03 05/31/03 EXPENDED 2003/04 05/31/04 EXPENSES SALARIES 100,865,586 87,129,343 86.38% 100,684,982 88,478,756 BENEFITS 24,838,361 22,050,704 88.78% 26,483,772 23,191 ,165 PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 17,012,549 85.94% 19,719,297 17,344,990 MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 6,545,663 78.42% 8,185,459 7,677,235 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 1,037,938 64.19% 1,575,580 1,153,149 OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 5,662,958 66.56% 8,384,567 5,633,897 DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,213,572 99.97% 12,098,342 12,191 ,763 TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176,189,538 151,652,727 86.07% 177,131,999 155,670,954 EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 15,093,286 57.72% 26,056,193 17,310,162 DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 3,284,313 82.52% 4,000,000 3,592,622 MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 20,018,609 79.86% 24,689,351 20,563,641 TOTAL 55,194,668 38,396,208 69.57% 54,745,544 41,466,425 TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 190,048,935 82.14% 231,877,543 197,137,379 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 3,719,541 (1 ,954,984) (3,860,233) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 3,026,595 1,578,177 1,574,384 OPERATING 8,675,891 10,896,039 9,052,274 7,150,819 TOTAL 9,325,586 13,922,634 10,630,451 8,725,203 % EXPENDED 87.88% 87.57% 87.96% 93.79% 73.19% 67.19% 100.77% 87.88% 66.43% 89.82% 83.29% 75.74% 85.02% ?\u0026lt; !!l C: C :,,,m .o.....z.... i5C Zjil ~ z \u0026gt; ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 05-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 (15,326.00) 17,956.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 15,326.00 15,325.88 0.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,325.88 95,176.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 97,962.91 9,782.50 12,056.96 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 1,794,877.15 14,870,559.04 3,402,258.40 2,136,605.11 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 27,732.72 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 8,679.00 21,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 5,176,217.33 2,635,818.36 493,635.36 4,815,343.42 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 158,459.00 17,647,102.58 5,519,415.76 8,298,447.25 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 1,007,370.04 224,021 .96 1,103,627.24 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 7,216,553.48 36,295,224.65 9,649,113.98 16,401 ,811.79 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (3,754,994.48) 18,319,604.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 1,175,653.56 (3,461 ,559.00) 5,002,871 .45 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 1,176,653.56 (7,216,553.48) 0.00 0.00 25,067, 182.19 GRAND TOTAL  ~!z 1ac az l lZ :i\n! :i 2.l!.12\ni ~a:i ~2! :i a ~!\nll! a !l :i~ lZC,0. PROJECT ALLOCATIONS PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 05-31-04 I ADMINISTRATION 673,846.55 NEW WORK PROJECTS 37,113,937.95 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 I MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 16,409,827.84 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,647,866.04 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 11,735,611.78 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 19,613,425.72 TOTAL 142,343,735.18 lN3WNMnorov x LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2004 EXPENSE 2000-01 889,772.32 1 443,467.00 113,930.47 2,641,482.13 1 791,385.63 397,615.34 575,016.53 I I 5,852,669.42 I I I EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED 2001-02 2002-03 i THRU 05.31.04 I THRU 05-31-04 1 (485,325.77) I 149,597.63 1 97,962.91 I 9,782.50 I 4,589,606.29 11 ,671,442.11 14,870,559.04 3,402,258.40 109,609.73 27,732.72 0.00 1,832,392.06 I 379,661 .38 1 8,679.00 I 0.00 4,218,294.40 I 3,455,350.67 2,635,818.36 493,635.36 1 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 17,647,102.58 5,519,415.76 I 4,325,201 .40 4,500,374.61 1,007,370.04 1 224,021.96 I 18,708,823.32 I I 35,822,666.30 36,295,224.65 1 9,649,113.98 I NOUOV AMVNlldl::\u0026gt;SIO lN30nlS \"Xl S\u0026gt;IMVW3M ~NISOlO 'IIIA ENDING ALLOCATION SUBTOTAL 05-31-04 661,789.59 12,056.96 34,977,332.84 2,136,605.11 251,272.92 14,541 .25 4,862,214.57 1 21,190.56 11,594,484.42 I 4,815,343.42 43,349,418.79 I 8,298,447.25 10,631,984.54 I 1,103,627.24 I I 19,613,425.72 106,328,497.67 36,015,237.51 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2004 I I  l Interest Rate I Fund I Purchase Maturity I Institution Type I Principal Date Date Operating I 05-28-04 TFN I Bank of America 0.830% Repo 8,400,000.00 Operating I 05-28-04 I 06-01-04 Bank of America 0.830% Treasury Bills 7,200,169.88 Operating 05-14-04 06-01-04 Twin City Bank 1.860% CD 4,612,566.63 Total I 20,212,736.51 I I l I Food Service 05-28-04 TFN Bank of America 0.780% Repo 690,000.00 l 690,000.00 I I I Activity Fund 05-25-04 I TFN Bank of America 0.790% Repo 1,000,000.00 Total I 1,000,000.00 ' I Bond Account 03-08-04 09-06-04 Regions I 1.050% I CD 400,000.00 l Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-14-04 Metropolitan I 1.930% I I CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-16-04 I Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 5,231,393.21 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 I 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD I 2,100,244.72 ' I Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 I 08-16-04 I USBANK 1.420% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 06-10-04 Bank of America 0.910% I Treasury Bills I 5,365,126.36 Capital Projects Fund I 05-14-04 06-18-04 I Twin City Bank 1.430% CD 9,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund I 03-15-04 09-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks I 1.400% CD 10,293,800.80  I I Capital Projects Fund 05-28-04 TFN I Bank of America 0.850% I Repo 4,315,000.00 I I Total I I I I I 51,783,149.46 ' I Deseg Plan Scholarship 12-05-03 06-15-04 I Bank of America I 1.020% I Treasury Bills 668,325.28 Total I I 668,325.28 ' I Rockefeller Scholarship I 01-15-04 06-10-04 I Bank of America 0.910% Treasury Bills 252,059.89 I Total 252,059.89 ' Risk Management Loss Fund I 05-17-04 I TFN I Bank of America 0.250% Repo 400,000.00 I 400,000.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1048","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-05"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1048"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["173 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nRECEIVED MAY 1 1' 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Agenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting CONGRATULATIONS GRADUATES May2004 :- C').., \ntl i=C ..... !I: Oz o\u0026gt;\nc\nc c-\u0026lt; m-n\nc C: -z\nc C') 0 ..... ,.... l5 r-z C')(I) \u0026gt; ~ ..,\nc g ~m mC ,.... C: C')~ o,.... ~~ =l m\nc \"' \u0026gt;. ~.,, \"'O .C.:, _X :-'I!, nx =l rr \u0026gt; C\": g8 z1!: en-c z u !l j\na :z !=' C') ..... \u0026gt; - I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING *May 20, 2004* 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Baseline Elementary School, represented by Eleanor Cox \u0026amp; Shara Hampton McDonald's - Geyer Springs \u0026amp; Baseline Stores, represented by Kristen Nosier C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update * Rescheduled from May 27 to allow for high school graduations. C') \"0 ),,:,C . m ~c .... :1: Oz o\u0026gt; :,c:,C m0--\u0026lt;.,\na C: -z\nan o---\u0026lt; rr--cz5 C')\"' ,,\u0026gt;...... -- Proposed Agenda for May 20, 2004 Page 2 V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes Regular Meeting - 04-22-04 Special Meeting- 05-13-04 B. Personnel Changes C. Rehire of Staff Members D. Contract Negotiations VI. CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION: A. Federal Grant: Smaller Learning Communities B. Federal Grant: Community Technology Center C. State Grant: 21 st Century Community Learning Center D. State Grant: Enhancing Education Through Technology Grant E. State Grant: Arkansas Better Chance for School Success F. Adoption of Health Textbooks G. Adoption of Family \u0026amp; Consumer Science Textbooks and Industrial Technology Education Textbooks VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: A. Act 1220 - Recommendation for Compliance B. CARE Program Tuition Increase C. Student Handbook Revisions, 2004-05 VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. ADJOURNMENT (')\"ti \u0026gt;. ~m ~c .... :i::: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ om--\u0026lt;., ~c -z ~(') ,o---c\u0026lt;5 r-z C') u, \u0026gt; := PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME Ill. REPOl\u0026lt;lli/Kt:\u0026lt;.:OONIIIUN:. A. SUPT. CITATIONS 0 . t'M.l'\\lllCf\\.\nJ 111 ~uvvn 1,..., ,. D. CTA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 May 20, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education o/ Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Partners in Education Program: New partnership.~ The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following school and business have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnership: Baseline Elementary School and McDonald's-Geyer Springs and Baseline stores !I' ~ C: 0 m .C,,: .z.. . O:,,. ?\n!:l mc5 z I: zm... . ~ a, C: 8 .m.. .C,,: ~... m a, 0z 0., , .~.. .nm.. . C/) BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3623 Baseline Rd. Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Partnership Agreement between Baseline Elementary and McDonald's Restaurant - Geyer Springs \u0026amp; Baseline Stores McDonald's Restaurant agrees to do the following: Present an assembly with Ronald McDonald during Red Ribbon Week (2004 - October 291h or other date during the week of October 25) Furnish one or more readers for VIPS reading day (2 nd Tuesday in November) Purchase uniforms Mentor two students Provide an opportunity for one or more intermediate students to job shadow at McDonald's (sometime during the month of February) Furnish a Career Day speaker Provide an opportunity for small group field trips to McDonald's for intermediate students Furnish flyers and coupons for a Baseline family night at McDonald's Geyer Springs location 3 or 4 times a year Participate in Baseline's community service project Sponsor a family for Christmas Sponsor a child by providing uniforms and school supplies Baseline Elementary agrees to do the following: Choir and/or drill team will perform for McDonald's during the holidays or other special events as arranged Collaborate with McDonald's on a float or banner for the Southwest Christmas Parade (usually the Saturday after Thanksgiving) Furnish a calendar of school events and invite McDonald's personnel to appropriate events Provide appropriate tokens of appreciation for partnership LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Junious Babbs OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 447-2955 E-Mail: junious.babbs@lrsd.org THROUGH: SUBJECT: Dr. Morris Holmes, Superintendent Student Assignment Update DATE: May 20, 2004 Student Assignment Committee Update The first session of the Student Assignment Committee has been set to convene in the LRSD Board Room, 810 W. Markham, on Wednesday, June 2, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. Ms. Patty Barker's name has been added to the committee. Appropriate information has been provided. Periodic updates will be given to keep you up on where things are. Mr. Daugherty, Co-Chair, may address additional updates and/or response to questions. Brown 50th Anniversary May 17, 2004 marked the 50th Anniversary of Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka. (A ruling by the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court that outlawed school segregation in the United States). This ruling is of significant importance and has had lasting implications in Arkansas and the Little Rock School District. LRSD presently detects strength, taking pride in our diversity and embracing a broad range of opportunity. As we acknowledge this anniversary and enter the '04-05 school year, we will take time to reflect on historical and present issues that result from this event. Additional information may be accessed via the LRSD website ( w\\\\'\\\\. lrsd.org). Pre-K 4 Year-Old Program Expansion Application is being made to the Arkansas Department of Education for Arkansas Better Chance for School Success (ABCSS). The district is seeking funding for approximately sixty-six (66) PreK classrooms for 4-year-olds. We await notification in early-mid summer to initiate 2004-05 student application and assignment. :..n.. m C') :z:c 0 8 -\u0026lt; :,\n, m i3 :: r\u0026gt; a, C 8 .m... C.. , .~... m ~ a, C oc z: O\u0026lt; ..,: :,\n,of C... m, C..'.). . en : r' )\u0026gt; C: !: C \"Cl \"\"\"t C \" ,,,. \\J, '~c. I -::::..,: j . , \\ ~1/ '.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: May 20, 2004 Board of Directors Donald M. Stewk\ninancial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Bill Goodman ~~ May 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects Please note the number of projects that are under construction. All are scheduled for completion by the start of the 2004-05 school year. The only exceptions are the interior renovation of Central High School and the renovation/addition to Dunbar Middle School. The Central project will be completed before the start of the 2005-06 school year. The Dunbar project is scheduled for completion late this fall. The contract for partial asbestos abatement and the microbial remediation at Mitchell has been awarded. The contractor has sixty (60) days to complete this work. Once completed, the remodeling work for Mitchell will begin. Please call me at 447-1146 if you have any questions. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us S01-124-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 :.n.. p:: :,:: z 0,. . 8 -\u0026lt; ::0 m ~ ~ ~ ::0 m :,:: ~ .0. , ~,..., .., !T )\u0026gt; C !: C\n, Cl\n, \"\"t C\n, Facility Name Baseline Booker Brady Central Dunbar J. A. Fair Geyer Springs Henderson McClellan Mitchell Parkview Pulaski Hgts. Elem Pulaski Hgts. MS Southwest CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MAY20, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I Project Description Cost I t::st. completron Date Renovation $953,520 Jul-04 Roof $48,525 Aug-04 Addition/renovation $973,621 Aug-04 . Renovation - Interior $10,200,266 Aug-05 Renovation/addition I $6,149,023 Dec-04 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music I room addition I $3,155,640 May-04 Roof Repair $161 ,752 Aug-Qi Lockers $80,876 Aug-04 1 Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-04 I Building Remediation $165,000 I Jul-04 Addition $2,121,226 . Jun-04 Renovation I $1,193,259 Aug-04 Renovation $3,755,041 Aug-04 I Addition I $2,000,000 Aug-04 Tech Ctr / Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 I Jul-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SUMMER2004 Facility Name I Project Description Cost I Est. completJon Date Booker ADA Rest rooms I TBD Au!tQi Central I Reflecting Pond $50,000 Aug-04 Central IHVAC Renovation - Band Area I $225,ooo I Au!tQi Chicot 1Drainage $64,700 Aug-04 Chicot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm $53,919 Aug-04 Mitchell !Renovation $2,212,493 Aug-05 Western Hills ADA Rest rooms $15,~ Auq-04 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Proiect Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown I Unknown Carver I Media Center Expansion I Unknown , Unknown Chicot Electrical Upgrade I Unknown ! Unknown Cloverdale Elementary Addition Unknown Unknown Dodd 1Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown Fair Park Addition Unknown Unknown Forest Heights Remodel $1,400,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Gibbs Addition Unknown Unknown Mablevale Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD , Unknown Meadowcliff Remodel I -- --- - - -U-nknown Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS ~gy monitoring system installation . Unknown Unknown Rightsell -- - Renovation -- $2,494,000 ~ ug-06 Washington - Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC -- . $640,0~ -- - Western Hills ~ g-05 ------ -- ----- Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown - Parkinq addition-- ---- - $193,777 - Woodruff Unknown CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MAY20, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I t::st. completion Date Administration Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Administration Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation I I May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. 'Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 I Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 Bale Partial roof replacement $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Booker 'Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Booker Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement --- $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady Energy efficient lighting $80,593 . Sep-02 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,072 I Aug-02 Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 I May-01 Carver 1 Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Central Parking Student parking $174,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 I Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Irrigation System $14,500 Aug-03 Central Purchase land for school Unknown Dec-02 Central I Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair $24,000 Oct-01 Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug-01 Central Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting I $189,743 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $1,393,822 I Nov-02 Dodd Energy efficient lighting I $90,665 Aug-01 Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 I Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 I Aug-02 Facilities Service I Interior renovation i $84,672  Mar-01 Facility Services Fire alarm I $12,000 l Aug-03 Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm I $315,956 I Apr-02 Fair Park Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park - Asbestos abatement-ceiling ! $59,310 __ Aug-01 J. A. Fair - --- Energy efficient lighting I $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box _,___ - $10,784 Nov-00 - - -- - - J. -A. F-air- - - Security cameras $12,500 Jun-01 - --\nc\n:thletic Field Improvement - $38,000 - J-. A-. F-air --- ---- Jul-03 J-. A. Fair - Irrigation System $14,000 Jul-03 Roofrepa~ --- J. A. Fair $391 ,871 I - __ ~ug-03 -Forest Pa-rk -- -- Replace window units w/central HVAC I $485,258 Nov-03 Forest Park Diagonal parking --$111 ,742 Aug-03 -- Forest Park - -- Energy efficient lighting $119,788 May-01 'Energy efficient lighting - Fulbright__ _ $134,463 Jun-01 Fulbright --Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,950 - - Aug-01 Fulbright ___ - . Replace roof top HVAC units -- -- $107,835 Aug-0~ Fulbright -- - Parking lot ---- $140,000 - ~-02 FulbriQht Roof repairs $200,000 Oct-02 2 :..\".. ~ :zc 0  -\u0026lt;\n,:, m c3 .\n,.:.,. !l \"t \"\n, (/ C :, \"rn r :, G ' f)\n,:, m :c ~ .0. , ..~..,, !T :,, C: !: C\n, (/\n, \"\"t C ::' CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MAY20, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Franklin . Renovation $2,511 ,736 Mar-03 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation ~ $11,770 Jul-01 Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 - Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 I Aug-01 Hall Intercom Feb-01 Hall Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 Henderson Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Jul-01 Henderson Roof replacement gym $107,835 May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 Aug-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Aug-02 IRC 1 Energy efficient lighting $109,136 --J-ul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 Oct-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot $269,588 Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units i $300,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,QQQ I Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting I $106,598 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 Aug-01 Mabelvale MS Renovation I $6,851,621 Mar-04 Mann , Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Apr-04 Mann !Asphalt walks\nThe total $1.8 million - Dec-01 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 Mann Fencing , projects listed Sep-01 Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System $14,750 I Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras I $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan Energy efficient lighting I $303,614 I May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 McDermott I Energy efficient lighting $79,411 Feb-01 McDermott I Replace roof top HVAC units I $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm I -- $16,175 . Jul-01 -Me-adowcliff Asbestos abatement - $253,412 ~g-02 -Me-adowcliff . Eng~gy efficient lighting $88,297 - Dec-02 Metropolitan __ - - Replace cooling tower - $37,203 - --De-c-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system - $20,000 - ~y-01 Metro~olitan Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 - Aug-01 Mitchell - - -- ~rgy efficient lighting $103,642 - - ~r-01 Mitchell ___ Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 --- - - Mitchell Asbestos abatement $13,000 Jul-01 -- -- -- ----- --- --- Oakhurst HVAC renovation $237,237 ALJ_g-01 Otter Creek --- -- -energy monitoring system installation ~695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy~fficient lighting - - - $81,828 . Apr-01 - Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 - -- --- -- - - -Ott-er Creek -- Parking lot - - $138,029 - ~g-02 Otter Cree-k - 6 classroom addition $888,778 Oct-02 - - --- - Otter Creek Parkinq Improvements $142,541 Auq-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MAY 20, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement ' $273,877 Sep-01 Parkview 'Exterior lights $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls I $301,938 Aug-01 Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 I Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 I Dec-02 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 I Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition $111,742 Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 I Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 SecurityfTransportation , Bus cameras I $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest New roof I $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest Drainage I street widening $250,000  Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 I Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 I Dec-01 Technology Upgrade . Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 Terrv Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 I Aug-02 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Nov-02 Washington Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 I Jul-01 Williams Renovation i $2,106,492 - Mar-04 Williams Parking expansions\n- $183,717 -De-c-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1,263,876 ~ Feb-04 -- - - Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff - Renovation ' $246,419 Aug-02 4 =\" -\u0026lt; Ill :z:c 0 r 8 -\u0026lt;\n,c m ~ ~ 9..,' n\ni (/ C :, :, ,n. ~ a G ' !\"\u0026gt;\n,c m ::c ~ 0.. , en \u0026gt;..,.,, !T )\u0026gt; C !: C\ni (/\ni .n., C ~ Date: May 20, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS To: Board of Directors From: ~andy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - May This is the fifty-fifth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. f) :,0 m % ~ 0.. , ~ .)...\u0026gt;,, Audit Report - May 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: May 20, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  On May 3 professional development sessions were held at all schools to provide training to staff in the integration of technology into the curriculum. Teacher trainers at each school provided the training after coming to the IRC for training from Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Comments from principals and teachers have been very positive with requests to provide similar sessions in the future.  Since the last Board meeting we have received notification on our E-rate applications for this year: o Our 2003-2004 applications for WAN lease, telephone service, electronics and cabling were all not funded. The reason given is that our documentation did not prove that price was the primary factor in selecting the vendor. We will appeal this decision. Some of these same applications have been funded in the past. o The E-rate web site this week posted a commitment to fund media retrieval systems in the amount of $1.3 million for 8 LRSD schools. Those schools are Brady, Fair Park, Franklin, Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller, Wakefield, and Watson.  Henderson Middle School has been approved to get an EAST lab next year. This brings the LRSD total of EAST labs up to 10. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical April 22 - May 20, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. ?' ,: n\nI'. \"C :a :a n,. C' ~ G ' p\n,o m ::c ~ 0.. , ~..,,,, DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS May 20, 2004 Board of Education Beverly Williams,~ector, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. !ll n 0 ii: .if.,.: ~ ::i:: n .mz. . m\no ~ C) !l $! lri .z..Z... C: ~ n h Personnel Changes Page 2 May 20, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignationsfferminations Certified Employees Woods-Cobbs, Sha Rhonda Elem I 8-7-03 Reason: Personal FRANKLIN 4-28-04 Moore, Kenneth Reason: Tennination Means, Barbara NONE NONE Asst. Principal HALL 7-22-96 4-8-04 New Certified Employees Title I SOUTHWEST 3-29-04 Certified Promotion Certified Transfer 2-02 TCH925 66-15 ADC105 6-18 TCHl 1 ANNUAL SALARY 29199.00 57060.00 51099.00 annual 15436.16 prorated Personnel Changes Page 3 May 20, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Emplovees Blount, Sandra 0cc. Therapist 2-14-00 60-12 Reason: None Given SPECIAL ED. 3-29-04 AN925 Bunton, Deborah Child utrition 8-12-03 3-01 Reason: None Given HENDERSON 3-2-04 FSH550 Cobbs, Larry Bus Driver 8-17-87 3-11 Reason: Retired TRANS. 2-12-04 BUSDRV Davis, Reshaunda Custodian 9-26-95 1-01 Reason: Health HALL 4-12-04 CUS925 Enlow, Robert Child Nutrition 4-11-03 3-01 Reason: Accepted Another BRADY 4-19-04 FSH550 Position Folsom, Barbara Instr. Aide 9-18-95 1-03 Reason: Retired GEYER SPRINGS 8-7-03 INA925 Henry, Carl Security Officer 4-20-01 30-19 Reason: Accepted Another MCCLELLAN 4-23-04 ANl0 Position Hill, Richard Custodian 1-9-01 3-05 Reason: None Given HENDERSON 4-22-04 CUS12 Houchins, Aliscia Secretary 8-1-00 42-07 Reason: Personal FACILITY SERV. 5-14-04 CLK!2 ANNUAL SALARY 43608.00 8364.00 14954.00 10626.00 8364.00 11970.00 21948.00 18909.00 21948.00 !I' n 0 I: .ii.=. nm ::,: n zm ..... m\no f\u0026gt; ~ C, !l ~i\ni .z...Z.... C:\no -\u0026lt; ,n-n !\"\u0026gt;\no m ::,::\nii m 0.. , .C.l.) ..)..\u0026gt;,, Personnel Changes Page 4 May 20, 2004 NAME Lopez, Juan Reason: Leaving City Lynch, Christine Reason: Accepted Another Position Lynch, James Reason: Retired Lyons, Peggy Reason: Accepted Another Position Parker, Raushanah Reason: None Given Sistrunk, Daphne Reason: None Given Smith, Marika Reason: Personal Smith, Tresa Reason: one Given Alexander, Keith POSITION SCHOOL Custodian SOUTHWEST Custodian BRADY Maintenance FACILITY SERV. Instr. Aide FAIR.PARK Child Nutrition GEYER SPRINGS Child Nutrition MCCLELLAN Instr. Aide STEPHENS Adult Ed. ADULT ED. START DATE END DATE 8-11-03 4-2-04 5-5-03 4-22-04 7-30-90 6-1-04 1-20-04 4-16-04 11-3-03 4-5-04 11-10-03 4-5-04 8-25-03 4-28-04 2-19-90 4-8-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS12 1-01 CUS925 49-19 MAINT. 1-10 INA925 3-01 FSH4 3-01 FSH550 1-10 INA925 31-20 A 925 New Non-Certified Emplovees Instr. Aide 4-1-04 1-10 SOUTHWEST INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 13784.00 10626.00 38700.00 14472.00 5917.00 8364.00 14472.00 23304.00 14472.00 annual 3129.08 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 May 20, 2004 NAME Bailey, Ada Boyd, Misty Carter, Charles Floyd, Robert Forte, James Henderson, Keily Iglesias, ZOraida POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide FAIR.PARK Care CARE Labor/Driver FACILITY SERV. Bus Driver TRANS. Instr. Aide SOUTHWEST Care CARE Instr. Aide WASHINGTO START DATE END DATE 5-4-04 4-19-04 4-9-04 4-2-04 4-9-04 4-19-04 4-20-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 INA925 1-02 CARE 40-03 MAINT. 3-04 BUSDRV 1-10 INA925 1-02 CARE 1-10 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10881.00 annual 1117.51 prorated 6.48 per hr. 18343.00 annual 4294.21 prorated 11621.00 annual 2480.89 prorated 14472.00 annual 2659.72 prorated 6.48 per hr. 14472.00 am1ual 2112.13 prorated !II 0 0 :I: .!.I.C. m 0 :c 0 .mz.. . m\n,o ~ ~ C) !l z~Z~ ........ C\n,o -\u0026lt; 0,.. .. 0 ~\n,o m :c\n.\nm .0. , \"...'. ..\u0026gt;..,, Personnel Changes Page 6 May 20, 2004 NAME Johnson, Lott Lanum, Robert McClelland, Bernard Meek, Kimberly Menhart, Gloria Palmer, Jerry POSITION SCHOOL Security Officer FAIR Custodian MCDERMOTT Custodian WOODRUFF Instr. Aide FULBRIGHT Instr. Aide FULBRIGHT Custodian SOUTHWEST START DATE END DATE 4-12-04 4-12-04 3-24-04 4-21-04 4-12-04 4-5-04 SALARY CLASS 36-10 SOFR9 1-01 CUS928 1-01 CUS12 1-01 INA925 1-07 INA925 1-01 CUS12 ANNUAL SALARY 14050.00 annual 2470.33 prorated 10626.00 annual 1963.50 prorated 13784.00 annual 3929.91 prorated 9466.47 annual 1330.42 prorated 7150.76 annual 1004.97 prorated 14849.00 annual 9605.00 prorated Personnel Changes Page 7 May 20, 2004 NAME Saler, Maria Scarver, Rachel Williams, Denita NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition HALL Custodian FAIR Security Officer METRO START DATE END DATE 4-6-04 4-12-04 4-22-04 Non-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 3-09 FSH550 1-01 CUS925 36-11 SOFR9 ANNUAL SALARY 8686.00 annual 1756.19 prorated 5313 .00 annual 981.75 prorated 14473.00 annual 1908.53 prorated !Jl n 0 E .~... nm ::z: n .mz.. . m \"' r\u0026gt; ~ C\u0026gt; !l ~/\nl .z...Z.... C: \"-\u0026lt;' n,... . n r\u0026gt; \"m' ::z: ~ 0.. , ~....,, '54.n Individual Approach to a World efKno1v/edge\" DATE: May 20, 2004 TO: FROM: Board of Education ~ Ms. Beverly Williams, Director-Human Resources THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Re: Rehire of staff members It is recommended that all certified teachers, except those in intern positions, or those funded with grant funds which end prior to June 30, 2005, be rehired effective May 20, 2004, for the 2004-05 school year. It is recommended that all other Little Rock School District employees be rehired effective May 20, 2004 for the 2004-05 school year, except those in positions funded with grant funds which end prior to June 30, 2005. Any employee who is recommended by the Superintendent for non-renewal or termination pursuant to the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act or the Arkansas Fair Hearing Act is not recommended for rehire for the 2004-05 school year, unless through the grievance process and/or their board hearing the non-renewal or termination recommendation is not upheld. 810 \\Y/ Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-44 7-1000  fax: 501-44 7-1001\ns \u0026gt;n  C: \",-'\noo gg ~E ZI: -\u0026lt; po z ~ !II n 0 I: ~ -\u0026lt; Ill ::z: n zm -m\u0026lt;\no '~n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" May 20, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From:  .~orris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Prepared by:('f-severly Williams, Director of Human Resources Re: Contract egotiations It is recommended that the following contract revisions be approved as were negotiated with the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association. These changes are for the 2004-05 school year and are addendums to the previously negotiated agreements. Transportation- Bus Drivers, Aides, and Monitors Security Officer 810 \\X'. 1arkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !ZI 0 0 :I: .~.. p:: ::z: 0 m .z. . m ,ID != n n !Tl \u0026gt; a, 0 V, V, C) ~..... LRSD Board of Directors and the LRCTA Bus Drivers, Aides, and Monitors Negotiated Agreement for the 2004-05 School year 1) Salary: a. 10% for the 2004-05 school year b. There is no guarantee in this package that additional funds allocated to LRSD because of Act 59 and/or changes in the Lakeview Court Settlement will be added to the teacher salary schedule. c. The two top out stipends mentioned on page 46 of the 2000-2003 agreement will be applied for the term of this agreement. 2) Article 21 Employee Benefits (Insurance): 1. Up to $260 for the 2004-05 school year. 2. Employees currently receiving the $550 in lieu of health insurance will not receive the stipend for the 2004-05 school year. They will be given an opportunity to enroll in a health insurance program during open enrollment in the fall. 3) The language offered by the board proposals on April 16, 2004, relative to Articles 9, 12, 13,14, 19 and pay codes must be agreed to with the following changes: Article 9, Section J (9) or failure Article 9, Section J, Note: Drivers who are convicted of a DWI or who have three moving violations on their driving records are no longer eligible to drive a LRSD School Bus. Such drivers will be reassigned to a LRSD vacant position for which they are qualified and will be compensated at the corresponding grade/step for the new position. If there are no vacant positions or no vacant positions for which they are qualified, then they will be terminated from the Little Rock School District. If a driver commits a third at-fault accident and that at-fault charge is subsequently overturned within three (3) months of the infraction, the driver will be restored to his/her original position. Drivers who have an at-fault accident overturned, within three (3) months and submit proof of this to the District, will have the at-fault status for the accident removed from their personnel file. A1ticle 13, new Section G on LRCTA proposal April 19, 2004 Article 14, Section A, Change future summer employment to summer employment for the next two years 4) Article 14 E (3), Change On or around to By October 1 of each year, (Unless an emergency prevents the Administration from compiling the necessary information.) all routes will be open for bidding. Article 19 E, add the following to the last sentence, except attendance incentive pay. Pay code Changes: 113 to $7.00 400 to $6.00 401 A to $3.50 INS 1 to $10.00 per hour Superintendent Cabinet will be $40.00 5) Current Contract Language will be in effect for articles 1, 2, 8, and 11 !I' n 0 IC .~.. m n % n .zm. . m \"' ~ n n !'\" c\u0026gt;c n \"\"'' C) .z~.. For Board Approval April 16, 2004 Board Proposal #2 ARTICLE 9. DISCIPLINE/nJST CAUSE A. No employee shall be disciplined (including warnings, reprimands, suspensions, reductions in rank, discharge, lay-off, terminations or other actions that would adversely affect the employee) without just and sufficient cause. B. The specific grounds forming the basis for disciplinary action will be made available to the employee and the Association upon request. C. An employee shall be entitled to have present a representative of the Association during any disciplinary action except oral warnings. When a request for such representation is made, no action shall be taken with respect to the employee until such representative of the Association is present provided that the Association representative must be available within twenty-four (24) hours of notice of the impending action. Further, in the event that a disciplinary action is proposed, the employee shall be advised of the right to representation under this provision of the Agreement prior to the action being taken. In the event an employee voluntarily waives their right to representation he/she shall be asked to sign a form stating such intent. D. The employer agrees to follow a policy of progressive discipline which normally includes one (I) written warning, one (I) written reprimand, suspension without pay, and discharge with exception of certain offenses stated in Section J which are grounds for immediate termination or provide for a specified penalty. Any disciplinary action taken against an employee shall be appropriate to the behavior which precipitates said action. Suspension without pay will normally be for 3 to I 0 working days. E. Employees who are terminated shall be given all accrued wages no later than the next payday. F. Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period of six (6) months may be discharged for any cause that is not arbitrary or capricious. 19 G. H. Employees who have not completed the initial probationary period of six (6) months shall not have access to the Grievance Procedure for disciplinary action or discharge. All employees are expected to conform to reasonable standards of performance and conduct. I. There are occasions when persons, because of the nature of their misconduct, may be suspended and recommended for immediate termination. J. Following are examples of serious offenses for which an employee will be recommended for immediate termination. These offenses may include, but are not limited to: I. Conviction, at a trial court level, of any felony or misdemeanor which is manifestly inconsistent with the safe and efficient operation or reputation of the school or department. 2. Fighting, threatening or attempting to do bodily injury to an employee or student. Bodily injury means physical pain, illness or any impairment of physical condition. 3. 4. Carrying weapons. A weapon is any object that could cause injury to another person or is not required to be in the possession of that employee in the normal course of his/her job. Stealing or misappropriation of property of the School District or the employees of the Little Rock School District. 5. Malicious mischief, the abuse, misuse or deliberate destruction or damaging of property, tools or equipment of the Little Rock School District or other employees of the LRSD. 6. Altering, tampering or falsification of time cards, \"sign-in out\" rosters or other reporting documents relative to attendance, promptness or departure. 7. Drinking alcoholic beverages on the job or during the duty day\nor the possession of, or introduction of, any alcoholic beverages on LRSD prope1iy at any time. This also includes reporting to work while under the influence of alcohol. 8. Use of non-presc1ibed narcotics, and/or the use, possession, or transmitting on LRSD vehicles or premises of drugs or substances capable of modifying mood and/or behavior. 20 !I' n 0 I: .~.. Ill :c n .mz. . m ::0 ~ IT IT !'\" \u0026gt; \"n' \"\"'' C) z~ ..... 9. Insubordination, including refusal or failure to perform work assigned and/or refusal to obey orders of supervisors. 10. Disorderly, disruptive or immoral conduct on LRSD vehicles or premises. 11. The making of or publishing of false, vicious or malicious statements concerning a supervisor or other employee of the Little Rock School District. 12. Falsification of personnel or other official school or insurance records, or making false statements when applying for employment. 13. Falsifying or refusing to give testimony concerning accidents involving school vehicles and/or incidents which are being investigated. 14. Failure to observe or purposefully disregard school district and department policy or procedure. 15. Use of District facilities, personnel, or equipment for non-District purposes. ote: Drivers who are convicted of a DWI or who have three moving violations on their driving record are no longer eligible to drive a Little Rock School District school bus. Additionally, drivers charged with three at fault accidents are no longer eligible to drive a Little Rock School District school bus. Such drivers will be considered for reassignment to other LRSD vacant positions for which they are qualified and will be appropriately compensated at the corresponding grade/step for the new position. However, drivers in this circumstance may request a position as a bus monitor if there are available positions. The decision to allow the driver this option rests 1,1,rith the Director of Transportation aHd will be based OH the driver's seHiority, overall job performaHce, and atteHdaHce. 21 For Board Approval Date: April 13, 2004 Board Proposal #2 ARTICLE 12. EMPLOYEE EVALUATION A. Each employee, upon employment or at the beginning of the school year, whichever is later, shall be apprised in specific terms of his/her responsibilities, which shall be consistent with the District adopted job description. Employees will be informed of the specific criterion upon which they will be evaluated and who is responsible to evaluate the employee. Each employee shall be given a copy of the evaluation form. The evaluator shall distribute this material, including an explanation. Evaluators shall be administrative personnel of the District. Employees shall be evaluated by their immediate supervisor. The immediate supervisor will be identified at the time of bidding or when permanent assignments are made. Other observations shall be made in writing at the time of observation. Evaluation criteria shall be based upon the specific skills outlined in District approved job descriptions. Evaluation criteria shall not require the employee to give unreasonable service or loyalty to any individual or to tolerate or endure abusive behavior or dangerous or threatening circumstances. (The evaluatiofl iHstrumeHt shall deHote Good, Fair, Needs Improvemeflt, Needs RetrainiHg for each criteriofl and o,rerall performance and shall have appropriate space for explaHatory commeHts.) B. It shall be the District's responsibility to assist employees in becoming oriented to the District and to improve their work performance through direct observation of the employee. The appropriate supervisor/administrator shall provide written summaries of these observations, together with any recommendations the administrator may have for the employee. All employees shall be evaluated at least once a year with 20 day probation for performance. C. Any employee who disagrees with an observation or recommendation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the observation in question. Any overall unsatisfactory rating, observation or recommendation which adversely affects the employee's standing may be grieved through the grievance procedure. D. All administrators/supervisors involved in performance evaluation shall be fully and properly trained in the techniques and criteria to be used in the evaluation process. Administrators/supervisors involved in evaluation shall be knowledgeable of the job 24 !D (\") 0\ni: !I: Pl ::,: (\") .mz.. . m\no rn \u0026gt; a, (\") u, u, C) ~ .z.. . area of the employee. No evaluation shall unduly interfere with the employee's carrying through his/her job assignment. E. In the event termination or non-renewal of the employee's contract is recommended, the employee and the Association shall be furnished a copy of such recommendation by certified mail or receipted hand-delivery with a statement of the reasons on which it is based. F. If an employee who has completed the required probationary period receives a notice pursuant to Section E above and Act 631 of 1991 desires a hearing, that employee is entitled to appeal the action under the Grievance Procedure (Article V). In such cases, the employee shall initiate the grievance at Level Two. 25 For Board Approval Date: April 13, 2004 Board Proposal #2 ARTICLE 13. EMPLOYMENTPROCEDURES A. Employees in the bargaining unit will serve in one of the following job classifications: B. 1. Full-Time Substitute Special Education Driver. A driver who has been selected to Substitute for any driver, monitor or aide position which is either unassigned or temporarily vacant due to employee absence. Must possess a Commercial Driver's License. When two or more persons who bid for a Full-Time Substitute Special Education Driver position are relatively equal in qualifications as determined in accordance with written, job-related, selection criteria (performance and attendance), seniority will govern. 2. 3. 4. Special Education Driver. A driver who has been selected to operate a special education vehicle in support of students with special needs. Must possess a Commercial Driver's License. When two or more persons who bid for a Special Education Driver position are relatively equal in qualifications as determined in accordance with written, job-related, selection criteria (performance and attendance), seniority will govern. Special Education Driver's Aide. An employee who has been selected, based upon demonstrated ability and/or the recommendation of dispatch and supervisory personnel, to assist the Special Education Driver in maintaining equipment, discipline, control, and comfort for students assigned to special education vehicles. The aide must possess the same driver's certification as school bus drivers and must maintain driving proficiency to allow for assignment as a driver when required. Slniority is not thl primary consicilration in Slllction for this position. (This position is bling phasld out through attrition. to bl rnplacld by Splcial Education Bus Monitors). Special Education Bus Monitor. An employee selected to provide assistance to students loading, unloading, and riding on special education buses. Employee must meet qualifications listed in the approved job description. 5. The District will no longer hire bus monitors, however, all bus monitors presently employed for the 2003-04 school year will be grand fathered into that position. The position will then be eliminated as the positions are vacated. Seniority shall be defined as the length of service within the District as a member of the bargaining unit. Accumulation of seniority shall begin on the employee's first working day. A holiday shall be counted as the first working day in applicable situations. In the 26 !JI (\") 0 I: .i.i.:. ~ ::c n m .z.. . m\n,o !'Tl \u0026gt; a, enn u, C) z~ ..... event that more than one individual employee has the same starting date of work, position on seniority list shall be determined by drawing lots. C. Probationary employees shall have no seniority until completion of the probationary period at which time their seniority shall revert to their first day of work. D. The employer shall prepare, maintain and post the seniority list. The initial seniority list shall be prepared and posted conspicuously in the Drivers' lounge with revisions and updates prepared and posted thereafter. A copy of the seniority list and subsequent revisions shall be furnished to the Association. E. Seniority shall be lost by an employee upon termination, resignation, retirement or transfer to a non-bargaining unit position unless they return to the District within three (3) years. Seniority shall not be lost by an employee who is returning to a bargaining position from a supervisory position. If an employee is on unpaid leave for more than 30 consecutive days then seniority will be deducted beginning on the first day of the leave. F. An employee who is resigning shall give two weeks notice. G. Each employee will be made available a copy of his/her job description upon hire. If the employee is transferred or the job description changed, the employee will be made available a copy of the appropriate description at that time. In case of a change, the incumbent employee will be provided orientation and training in the new responsibilities. The Board will provide CTA a copy of all job descriptions in the unit and will provide updated descriptions when revisions are made. The Board will provide a listing of all employees in the unit by job title. If LRSD requests the Director of Transportation to temporarily employ drivers to work outside their normal round of duties, said drivers shall be employed on the basis of seniority and qualifications. H. All employees must obtain a TB skin test or large chest X-ray consistent with Health Department regulations. I. A withholding tax form shall be executed at the time of employment. J. The Board will not subcontract work customarily performed by its employees: (I) unless adequate existing equipment and/or facilities are not available to perform the work when it is needed, or (2) unless the Board does not have employees covered by this contract in sufficient number and/or skill to perform such work, or (3) unless it is deemed necessary to transfer or subcontract such work because of other demands on such equipment and other facilities to do other work which is to be performed. 27 K. Drivers on leave will only be allowed to bid on routes if their estimated return to work day is less than thirty (30) days after the first day of route bidding. L. Drivers on leave who fail to return to work within the thirty (30) days of the first day of route bidding must forfeit the route and the route will be reposted for bidding. M. Drivers absent in excess of forty-five (45) consecutive days will forfeit their routes, which will be reposted for bidding. 28 !I' n 0 !IC .~... ~ ::z: n .zm.. . m\n:o rn \u0026gt; 0:, n en en C) ~ .z.. . For Board Approval Date: April 16, 2004 Board Proposal #3 ARTICLE 14. HOURS OF WORK MID OVER+IME A. The normal work year for school-term employees shall be that number of student days mandated by the State Department of Education. However when summer employment is available, it shall be posted for (7) days. Hiring for summer positions shall be based on-seniority, good work attendance, and job performance. Drivers/ aides who accept summer employment and who do not complete the assignment obligation will not be considered for summer employment for the next two (2) years. Exceptions will be made for emergency and/or extreme medical conditions. B. Regular pay shall be paid on early dismissal days and drivers will work adjusted schedules as required to meet needs of students transported. Drivers shall receive regular pay for time worked on emergency days. C. When inclement weather forces the closing of any work sites, all local radio and television stations, including KLRE, shall be notified so that announcements may be made no later than 6:00 a.m., if possible. D. Reporting Time. All OOef6 transportation employees will be required to report to work in the morning not later than thirty minutes before the first scheduled stop on the first run or 6:00 AM whichever comes later. All OOef6 transportation employees are required to report not less than 30 minutes before too their first scheduled afternoon pickup time. Additionally, all transportation employees must report 30 minutes before their noon run. E. Assignment/re-assignment Of Bus Routes. The following procedures will be followed in assignment and re-assignment of bus routes. 1. At the beginning of the school year all returning drivers will be assigned, to the extent possible, to the route which most closely resembles the route the driver drove at the end of the previous school year. 2. New (first year) drivers will be assigned open routes based upon the director' s/supervisors' assessment of aptitude. These assignments will be made following the initial assignments ofreturning drivers and after the conclusion of the bid process. 28 3. On or ru:ound By October 1 of each year, (Unless an emergency prevents the Administration from compiling the necessary information.) all routes will be open for bidding. Employees will be afforded an opportunity to ''bid\" on-RmS routes of their choice. For this purpose a route will be considered to be a combination of morning/afternoon school runs assigned to an individual bus to make most effective use of limited vehicular resources. The assignment of runs routes will be based on driver seniority. This will be the only time during the school year that all routes will be open for bidding. Scheduled bidding times will be established by management and strictly followed. Each driver will be allowed fifteen (15) minutes to bid. Those drivers who cannot be present may authorize a unit member or management to bid for them if their proxy is given in writing. Those who exceed their time or fail to show will be placed at the bottom of the list. A seniority list will be posted at least three (3) days prior to the bidding with all parties given an opportunity to correct any errors. The tentative route list-s book for bidding will be posted during the same period. Any necessary changes to the routes after posting and before bidding will be posted and highlighted. Also, no changes will be accepted one (1) work day before bidding starts. All changes prior to that day will be posted prior to the start of bidding. After bidding begins, students will be added to the appropriate runs as required. 4. Following assignment of this route no further bidding will be made. A driver will be assigned to drive the remaining open route. This cut-off of bidding is necessary to retain stability of operations and preclude a domino effect of all routes. 5. It is possible that the nature of the route originally bid could be changed significantly during the course of the school year. The determination of when a route falls into this category will be made by the director based upon the recommendations of the supervisors and dispatchers. lt is also possible that additional routes could be added during the school year or that routes become vacant due to resignation or termination of the driver. 6. If the events of the preceding paragraph occur, the route will be posted for bids for two working days prior to assignment. No bids will be accepted beyond 5 :00 p.m. of the second working day following posting of the routes. Drivers who bid on and accept routes made available under the circumstances related in the preceding paragraph will not be allowed to bid on any 29 !I' C') 0 I: .~.. m C') % C') .mz. . m ::0 r\"' \u0026gt; a, C') \"\"'' C, ~ .z. . additional routes for another thirty (30) days. If the bidding process causes another route to become vacant, the administration may appoint a driver to fill the vacancy until all routes are bid the following October. 7. Full-time Substitute positions are not subject to the above procedures. All Fulltime Substitute positions will, however, be posted for two working days to allow drivers to indicate their interest in the position. 8. All routes will be paired with two runs. If for any reason a second run is deleted or the route is put up for bid without a second run, management reserves the right to add one at any time during the year. Additionally, for any route that can not be paired drivers will be asked to do an additional run during the time frame they would normally have a second run and there will be no additional compensation. The procedures outlined in this policy statement are intended to insure equity and consistency in assignments within the Transportation Department. Changes in assignments outside of the bidding process will be made only for reasonable cause. The Superintendent shall have the right, at his/her discretion, to make administrative changes in assignments. Such assignments shall have precedence over all other assignments. F. Training requirements for bus driver personnel are a condition of employment. We are obligated by law to train personnel in matters of safety and performance. Therefore it is incumbent upon the District to provide this opportunity to all unit personnel. Prior to the opening of school, on panmt conference days, and t@acher work days and throughout the school year the District will provide thirty hours of paid mandatory in-service. Personnel may take additional training during the year. The District will pay $25.00 per @ach tlH=ee how= s0ssion or~ $10.00 per hour up to a total of 45 hours per year per employee for staff development. 30 For Board Approval Date: April 13, 2004 Board Proposal # 2 ARTICLE 19. LEAVES A. B. 1. Attendance Incentive - An attendance incentive will be given to all drivers, aides, and monitors who have perfect attendance. If a driver, aide, or monitor is required to serve jury duty or is Ofl military lsa.vs, these absences will not count against the employee. There will be three separate periods established for achieving perfect attendance. The employee shall not miss any days for sick leave, military leave, be on leave without pay, or be off the payroll for any reason to qualify for the perfect attendance incentive. ($200, $200, $200, $200) 1. The first incentive period will begin the first day of contract and end ovember 30. The incentive of $200 will be paid on the supplemental 2. 3. payroll in December. The second incentive period will begin December 1 and end February 28 (29). The incentive of $200 will be paid on the supplemental payroll in March. The third incentive period will begin March 1 and end the last day of school. The incentive of $200 will be paid on the supplemental payroll in June. 4. An additional $200 incentive will be paid if the employee bas \"perfect attendance\" for the entire year. 5. An incentive of $100 for missing only day aoo or $75 for missing only 1 day will also be paid psr paid per period. Sick Leave Accumulation of sick leave shall begin with the first month of employment, or the first day of the school year, whichever is applicable and shall accrue at the rate of one day per month. 2. If the employee resigns or leaves his/her employment position before the end of the school term, the Little Rock school District may deduct from his/her last pay check full compensation for any days of sick leave taken in excess of the days earned. 35 !II 0 0 :I: .ii.=.. ~ :,: 0 .mz.. . m\no fl !T1 \u0026gt; ~ V\u0026gt; V\u0026gt; C\u0026gt; .~... 3. An employee is entitled to sick leave days only for reason of personal illness or illness or death in his/her immediate family. Immediate family shall be considered to include father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, husband, wife, grandparents, grandchildren, sister-in- law, brother-in-law, mother-inlaw, father-in-law, aunt, uncle, and other persons living in the same household. 4. A record of sick leave used and accumulated must be maintained by the District. Sick leave that is unused during any school year shall be carried forward until 175 days have been accumulated. 5. An employee who qualifies for sick leave may use any amount up to his/her total number of accumulated days. 6. Accumulated days of sick leave that are used may be restored up to 175 days in the same manner that they were first accumulated. +. The Superintendent of Schools may advance three days sick leave to ntw.' employees upon the employee's v,'Fitten request and the recommendation ofth@ supervisor or department head. 7. In cases where an employee frequently claims sick leave for personal illness, or upon an absence of five (5) days or more due to personal illness, the District may require a doctor's certificate verifying the illness. 8. Two sick leave days may be used for personal reasons. C. Leave Without Pay Leave of absence, without pay, may be granted by the Director of Human Resources to an employee upon written request and recommendation of the Director of Transportation under the terms stated below: 1. For personal illness, if it can be shown that rest and recuperation will contribute to the welfare of the employee. 2. Request for leave of absence must be submitted by the employee to the supervisor or department head at least two weeks prior to the beginning of the leave, except in case of emergency. 3. Failure to notify the supervisor or department head of intention to resume work, or failure to report for duty at the expiration of a leave of absence or extension granted, or failure to ask for additional leave of absence in case of protracted absence shall be considered a resignation. 36 4. Employees who are on leave without pay do not accrue seniority while on leave. D. E. F. G. Military Leave Military leave will be granted, without loss of status and art1mdance incsntive, but with no pay, according to the provisions of the Military Leave Act. Jury Service and other Related Appearances Any employee called for jury duty, or who is subpoenaed to testify during work hours in any judicial or administrative matter related to district business, including requested attendance during an arbitration fact-finding proceeding shall be paid his/her full compensation for such time with no loss of any leaves, seniority, or Joss of any other benefits. When subpoenaed in non-District related business, the leave will be without pay, but will be considered as an eKcused abs@c@ 1Nith no loss of any other benefit except the attendance incentive pay. Maternity Leave The District will grant an unpaid leave of absence for maternity leave. The leave will commence upon the request of the employee and her physician. Accumulated sick leave days can be used in the maternity leave at the discretion of the employee as disability as defined by the employee's physician. The employee will be allowed to return to work upon release from her physician. Emergency Leave An unpaid leave for health or other emergency reasons may be granted by the Director of Human Resources upon written request. This leave may be extended with the approval of the Director of Human Resources for a specific period oftime. H. Bereavement Leave Employees may use sick leave days for leave connected with the death of members of the immediate family. Immediate family shall be considered to include father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, husband, wife, grandparents, grandchildren, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, mother-in-Jaw, father-in-law, aunt, uncle, and other persons living in the same household. I. Union Leave The Union will be allowed to use up to six (6) unpaid leave days per year. Not more than two (2) such days may be used at any time. The Union president shall authorize to the Director of Transportation the names of those persons to be granted such leave. 37 !II 0 0 E .~.. ~ % 0 .mz. . m\n,a C) !l $! ~ z....Z.... C: ~ 0 h !\" \u0026gt; CJ 0 \"\"'' C) $! .z.. . J. On-The-Job-Injury Any employee suffering an on-the-job-injury shall be paid his/her full compensation for such time with no loss of any leaves, seniority, or loss of any other benefits, subject to the regulations of the State of Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission to the limit that the payment of Workers' Compensation and other accrued leaves do not exceed 100% of the employee's regular salary. K. Absenteeism Because unwarranted absenteeism wastes the District's money, and works a hardship on employees who maintain good attendance records, the administration will follow a policy of progressive discipline for absences and tardiness. An employee who is absent from his/her position for five (5) consecutive days without notifying the Director of Transportation shall be considered as abandoning his/her position. L. Family Medical Leave Qualified Bus Drivers/aides/monitors may take up to twelve (12) weeks of unpaid leave under the terms of the Family and Medical Leave Act except immediate family. (See Article XIX, Section H for definition.) After the leave has been approved the Bus Driver/Aide/Monitor will receive full normal health care coverage for up to twelve (12) weeks of the leave. When the maximum of twelve (12) weeks has expired the language in any other provisions of this contract shall apply. 38 Date: To: From: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 May 20, 2004 Board of Education Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by: Linda Austin, Director of Planning and Development Subject Federal grant submission: Smaller Learning Communities Summary The District submitted a Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) proposal to the U. S. Department of Education on April 29, 2004. The proposal includes two LRSD high schools, Central and J. A. Fair. Objectives The LRSD SLC proposal includes three broad objectives: 1) to restructure the target schools into smaller learning communities based on students' career and academic interests to create a more personalize and supportive school environment\n2) to improve overall academic achievement in reading and mathematics for all students and narrow the achievement gap that exists between minority and non-minority students\nand 3) to enhance teacher capacity to incorporate researchbased instructional strategies into their daily teaching practices that engage students in learning through targeted, ongoing professional development and capacity building activities. Budget amount $749,928 Duration September 2004 - August 2007 !JI n 0 lll: .ii.=. m n ::c n m .z. . m\n:o !TI \u0026gt; a:, n V\u0026gt; V\u0026gt; C\u0026gt; ~ z.. . Date: To: From: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MAKRHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 May 20, 2004 Board of Education Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by: Linda Austin, Director of Planning and Development Subject Federal grant submission: Community Technology Center Summary The District proposes to submit a Community Technology Center grant application in partnership with EAST, Inc. to expand the newly established Central High 9th grade technology center Objectives The LRSD CTC proposal includes three broad objectives: 1) to expand access to information technology and related training for disadvantaged residents of the Central High community Budget Match Duration 2) to provide extended instructional services through after school, Saturday and summer programming 3) to enhance teacher capacity to incorporate technology-based instructional strategies into teaching practices through professional development $500,000 In-kind match is required September 2004 - August 2005 ~.... s 8 :,r\n\u0026gt; 8 ~ 0z (J) !\"' \u0026gt; a, (\") (J) (J) C\u0026gt; ~ .z.. . Date: To: From: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MAKRHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 May 20, 2004 Board of Education Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by: Linda Austin, Director of Planning and Development Subject State grant submission: 21 st Century Community Learning Center Summary The District proposes to submit a 21 st Century Community Learning Center (CCLC) grant application to create a community learning center at Mabelvale Magnet Middle School. Purpose Budget Duration The LRSD Mabelvale 21 st CCLC proposal will include extended learning opportunities that will operate after school, before school, on Saturdays, and during the summer. These programs will include intensive academic enrichment opportunities along with other high interest activities designed to complement the students' regular academic program. $150,000 - Year One $390,000 - Year Two through Year Five $540,000 - Total Request September 2004- July 2009 .p.. s a:, 8 ::\u0026gt;\u0026lt;  8 '.!l 0z \"' !TI  a:, (\") \"\"'' C\u0026gt; .z~.. Department of Instructional Technology 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 May 20, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: EETT Grant A tri-district grant proposal was submitted to Arkansas Department of Education for an EETT (Enhancing Education Through Technology) Grant on May 13, 2004. This grant is a partnership grant submitted by the three districts in Pulaski County. It will provide mobile Alphasmart labs to four middle schools in each of the three districts to support literacy, mathematics and science instruction. It will also provide professional development in how to use the mobile labs for teachers in the schools involved. LRSD schools selected are Cloverdale Middle School, Henderson Middle School, Mabelvale Middle School and Southwest Middle School. The total amount requested from the grant is $300,000. LRSD share of the funds is $100,000. No matching funds are required. We are asking the Board's approval to maintain the submission of this grant. p -4 8 a, 8 :,,:: \u0026gt; 8 ~ 0z \"' -4 a, C:. ~~ o\n:o zm zn\noJl\n:o C\u0026gt; ~~ m!I:: !\" \u0026gt; a, n \"\"'' C\u0026gt; ~ z -4 TO: FROM: ',_!_,,# !.~ ,,,~ 'H - l' fj ~ , ' ~~ '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" May 20, 2004 Board of Directors Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood /Elementary Literacy THROUGH: Mr. Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent SUBJECT: Arkansas Better Chance for School Success (ABCSS) Grant Proposal Summary -- The Early Childhood Department requests approval to submit an application to the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education, for new and continued funding of developmentally appropriate early childhood programs for the three and four ( 4) year old children who reside in the district. Objectives -- The overall goal of the LRSD ABCSS program is to expand the opportunity for quality early childhood education experiences for the three- and four-year-old children in the district who are educationally deprived. Expected Outcomes -- Having access to nurturing, supportive educational experiences will prepare preschool children to enter kindergarten with the necessary cognitive, physical, social and emotional, and early language and literacy skills for success in school. The outcomes of the project will be measured through an online assessment system required by the project. Population -- Three and four year old children who reside in the district and who meet specific criteria established by the ABCSS program. Source of Budget/Budget Amount -- The Arkansas Department of Human Services has announced the availability of funds to assist in providing early childhood programs which identify and assist educationally-deprived children, ages three (3) and (4) years, as specified in the Arkansas Better Chance Program for School Success, Act 49 of 2004. This proposal will allow the District to make application in a competitive process for approximately $5.5 million in continuous funding from the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Early Childhood Education. The funds will support centerbased early childhood education opportunities for the four-year-old children in the district and home-based (HIPPY) educational opportunities for the three year old children in the district. 810 \\'\\'. t- 1arkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 p -, g a, 8\n,,\n\u0026gt; 8 ::!l 0z u, -, a, C: . -n ::!\u0026gt; O\n:a zm z\ng g ~~ m!I: ~ -u,, C: 0 :m:amz :S -, u, ::c a~ Zo u, a, Manager -- Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy Duration -- ABCSS funding is renewed annually upon submission of the grant continuation application. Long Range -- Continuation of and expansion of early childhood services offered in the District. Other Agencies Involved -- none Needed Staff -- Based upon the amount of funding provided and the level of the expansion of the preschool program, the District will potentially need 1) one clerical position to complete, submit, and maintain the required quarterly reports and other miscellaneous information and 2) one coordinator's position to manage the implementation of the expansion of the early childhood program. Comments -- The District decided to make application for every school which met the eligibility criteria even though some schools fell in the category of lowest priority for funding. Recommendation -- We recommend approval of the request to submit this proposal to the Arkansas Department of Human Services. ARKANSAS BETTER CHANCE FOR SCHOOL SUCCESS (ABCSS) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PROPOSAL  Site Information  Program Abstract May 14, 2004 0 ~ C: C\n,om mz S--\u0026lt; (l)::C 6~ ZC (I) a, ARKANSAS BETTER CHANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION COVER SHEET 2004-2005 NAME OF DISTRICT/AGENCY Little Rock School District ADDRESS -81-0 W-. -Ma-rkh-am- ---- CITY _L_t_'ttl_e_Rock---'-'--'----- ZIP CODE COUNTY _P_u_ la_ ski_ ___ CONGRESSIONALDISTRICT -\"-2 _ TIN# 716014717 MAIN OFFICE CONT ACT PERSON(S): Krista Underwood 1ELEPHONE NO. E-MAIL ADDRESS _5~0c.\n:l_-44\n...\n...\n..7--=-3\n.:32::.:\n5_ _____ FAX NO. Krista. underwoodcaUrsd. org THREE AND FOUR YEAR OLD CHILDREN 501-447-7619 72201 CENTER-BASED PROGRAM MODEL (178 days minimum) HOME-BASED (Full Program year) TOTAL NUMBER OF ABC CHILDREN TO BE SERVED TOTAL NUMBER OF NON-ABC CHILDREN TO BE SERVED (acrou the district) List all sites that will serve ABC Children CENTER-BASED HOME-BASED 1202 95 150 0 ABC Site No.of No. of No. of Counties Program School Districts No. of Name ABC Non-ABC ABC Will Program Will Serve ABC Children Children Class- Serve Days of rooms Ooeration HIPPY 95 0 n/a Pulaski LRSD 178 Bale 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 Baseline 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 Brady 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 Carver 20 0 1 Pulaski LRSD 178 Chicot 80 0 4 Pulaski LRSD 178 Cloverdale 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 Dodd 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 Fair Park 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 Franklin 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 Fulbright 20 20 l Pulaski LRSD 178 Geyer Springs 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 King 80 0 4 Pulaski LRSD 178 Mabelvale 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 Meadowcliff 60 0 3 Pulaski LRSD 178 Otter Creek 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 Rightsell 10 0 1 Pulaski LRSD 178 Program Begin \u0026amp; End Dates August 19, 2004 - May 23, 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3. 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004- June 3 2005 August l 9, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004- Tnn3 ~fin\u0026lt; August 19, 2004 - June 3, 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3. 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004 - Tnn 3 ~M\u0026lt; August 19, 2004 - June 3. 2005 August 19, 2004 - June3. 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3. 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3 2005 August 19, 2004 - June 3. 2005 Rockefeller 40 60 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004 - Jtme 'l '\u0026gt;llll\u0026lt; Romine 30 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004- June 3 2005 Stephens 80 0 4 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004 - '--1 '\u0026gt;llll\u0026lt; Wakefield 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004 - June3 2005 Washington 100 0 5 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004 - Tun1 ?MS Watson 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004- June3 2005 Western Hills 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004 - T,- 1 ?1\\1\\( Wilson 40 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004- June3 2005 Woodruff 22 0 2 Pulaski LRSD 178 August 19, 2004- Tun 1 ?/lll( TOTAL 1297 0 62 PROGRAM'S FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING \u0026amp; ENDING DATES: July 1 _2004=.June 30.,2005 Is your program audited by Legislative Audit? Yes If not, a copy of your audit is required each year. If your program is a joint application, list all agencies involved I certify that the infonnation in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE ~ ~ DMSION OF CHILD CARE \u0026amp; EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF BUMAN SERVICES P.O. BOX 1437, SWT S-160 LIITLE ROCK, AR 72203 501-682-9699 =\" :r  m 8~ \"-D,: z..:. 5z-g-, 0 \"...' C: 0 ::Om mz S\"\"' u,:,:: 0~ ~55 ! .p.. s a, 8 :,,\n 8 =!l zi5 \"' Program Abstract Little Rock School District Arkansas Better Chance for School Success PROGRAM ABSTRACT I. Over all Program Goals and Objectives The overall goal of the LRSD ABCSS program is to develop and expand the early childhood education opportunities for the three- and four-year old children in the district who are educationally deprived either through the center-based or home-based (HIPPY) setting. Having access to nurturing, supportive educational experiences will prepare the children to enter kindergarten with the necessary cognitive, physical, social and emotional, and early language and literacy skills for success in school. Center-based Program Goals The District goals for the center-based programs will be achieved through the following program objectives: 1) Development of teachers' capacity to deliver research-based developmentally appropriate instruction to enhance all areas of a child's development\n2) Development of teachers' capacity to deliver research-based developmentally appropriate literacy instruction in the areas of oral language development, phonological awareness, print awareness, and alphabet knowledge\n3) Provision of both English and Spanish materials/supplies to provide a print-rich environment\n4) Utilization of screening assessments or other appropriate measures to determine whether children are developing the language, cognitive, and early literacy skills they need for later academic success\n5) Utilization of assessment data for program evaluation\n6) Inclusion of the Preschool program in the District's Literacy plan to ensure alignment of programming from Preschool to Grade 5 and easy transition from Preschool to Kindergarten\n7) Opportunity for parental engagement in children's early learning\n.... a, C:. :::\n~ i5::o zm z\n:g no ::0 C) ~~ m:r:: r, u...,. C: C ::om mz S-\u0026lt; u,::,: i5 ~ ZC u, a, 8) Activities to ensure children's smooth transition to elementary school programs\nand 9) Dedication of a portion of the Office of Early Childhood staff time to monitoring implementation of the ABCSS program in selected schools. The objectives for each school's preschool program are included with the site information. HIPPY Program Goals and Objectives The Little Rock School District HIPPY program operates with two major sets of goals and objectives: 1) Child-focused Goals\n2) Parent-focused Goals. The child focused goals include two years of educational experiences with emphasis on language development, sensory and perceptual discrimination skills and problem solving. The parent focused goals include, self-esteem, parent as educator skills, problem solving skills, advocacy for child's educational needs, and transition from home to school. II. Type of Program and Curriculum Used Center-based Program Using the state's Early Childhood Framework as a basis, the Little Rock School District's center-based four-year-old-program uses a curriculum that was developed by a task force composed of specialists, teachers, instructional aides, and parents. The curriculum is based on the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the (International Reading Association) IRA standards for programming for the preschool child. The District curriculum provides instruction that is sensitive to the developmental changes in growth and learning that occurs according to the child's strengths, interests, needs, and experiences. The program offered in all sites across the district offers a learning environment that is safe, yet provides challenging and achievable opportunities. Play is recognized as an important vehicle for the social, emotional and cognitive development of children and a reflection of their development. The curriculum is sensitive to the cultural and ethnic heritage of children and provides for interaction with students from various backgrounds in diverse settings to respect and value each other. In addition, the LRSD preschool program accepts and mainstreams special needs children in their classrooms and all facilities are handicapped accessible. The district provides services through the Tri-district Early Intervention Program. HIPPY Program The LSRD's home-based program (HIPPY) serves the specific purpose of maximizing efforts for trained District personnel to work in a cooperative, collaborative manner with parents to effectively intervene in the lives of three- and four-year-old HIPPY participants to improve learning. The program is coordinated with and under the supervision of the Little Rock School District Early Childhood Education Program which allows alignment of programming with the District's preschool center based program. The collaborative effort also provides the needed resources, such as support staff, opportunities for professional development and instructional materials for HIPPY children that are provided to the center-based teachers and children. Ill. Teacher qualifications Little Rock School District currently employs certified personnel licensed in early childhood or elementary education to teach in every preschool classroom. In addition, all teachers' aides and Home-Based Educators in the district are required to have a Child Development Associate's (CDA) certification. The District ensures that the practice of hiring highly qualified personnel will continue as the expansion of the preschool program is implemented. IV. Number of students to be served The number of students projected to be served by LRSD ABCSS center-based program is 1202 four ( 4) year olds. The number of students projected to be served by the LRSD home-based (HIPPY) program is 95, with the majority of the children being the age of three (3). 3 ~ a, C-~:,n.. . o\n,c zm z\ng no\n,c Cl ~ ~ m\nI: r\u0026gt; ~ C: 0\n,cm ms~z en ::c 0~ ZO en a, V. History of program operation Center-based Program Little Rock School District received its first Arkansas Better Chance (ABC) grant in 1991 and opened three preschool classrooms. The District received funding for 78 children through ABC in six classrooms in three schools in the district (Woodruff, Romine, Rightsell). Since that time the District has shown continued commitment to providing preschool opportunities by expanding the preschool program into every school, except the four Magnet schools. Unfortunately, although the District has committed significant funding for preschool, the funding has not been sufficient to allow placement for every child. Every year the Little Rock School District may have as many as 500 children on a waiting list for placement into its 4-year old program. HIPPY Program The HIPPY program has been in operation in the Little Rock School District since 1986 and is one of the four oldest in the state. Prior to this year, even though the HIPPY program was under the supervision of the LRSD Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy Department, the base office was housed in other locations. Last July 2003, the base office was relocated to the LRSD Instructional Resource Center which also houses the Early Childhood Department. The Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy has been more involved in overseeing the maintenance and operation of the program and the Coordinator works part time as a literacy specialist in the Department, allowing more collaboration and alignment between the two programs related to job performance, resources, and professional development. VI. License status/Quality Approval/ Accreditation status All of the existing Little Rock School District preschools are licensed by DHS and have obtained Quality Approval/ Accreditation. During the 2003-04 school year, the average ECERs rating for all programs in the district was 6.9, with many sites receiving a perfect rating of 7.0. A letter from 4 the Division of Childcare and Early Childhood Education (DCECE) indicating the license and quality approval status of the preschool programs across the district is provided in Appendix A. In addition, the review of the HIPPY program by the state resulted in an exemplary report with the program garnering 93% on the Validation Instrument. It is the intent of the District to continue the exemplary efforts made by program staff to work toward an even stronger validation rating. The district ensures that qualified personnel will be employed in the preschool programs and the same rigor of quality currently offered in the District will be maintained in all sites funded through ABCSS. The District utilizes a personnel evaluation system that monitors any employee whose certification is deficient. After a designated amount of time, any employee who has not met the licensing requirements is removed from the position. VII. Justification of need Justification for funding the LRSD preschool center-based and home-based program is based on four issues: high poverty, low achievement, a history of high quality preschool programming and local interest. High Poverty. According to the 1989 census, approximately 24% of the children 5 years and younger who live in Little Rock live below the poverty level. Family composition is related to income and poverty--youth with two parent families generally have greater incomes than youth from families with only one parent. About 3 out of 10 families in Little Rock are single-parent families-about 2 out of 10 of those are white families and 5 out of 10 are African American families. About 22% of Little Rock's children live in poverty, but for African American youth the poverty rate climbs to 37%. The district's total African-American population is approximately 69% and many of the schools for which the district is making application have an African-American population of 65-95%. In addition, the district Hispanic population increases every year with the enrollment currently at approximately 3%. 5 _, CD -cn .... \u0026gt; o\n:o zm z~ no\n:o C\u0026gt; ~~ m!I: !\"' !!l C 0\nom mz :-5-t en ::c 0~ ZO en a, In the Little Rock area, high quality preschool programming would diminish the disparity in achievement that exists between high poverty and low poverty children. Low achievement. Nineteen (19) of the District's elementary schools are in school improvement because oflow performance on the state's Benchmark Exam in math or literacy. The District's student performance on the State's Criterion Reference Test (CRT) has improved every year, but still continues to be less than satisfactory. High Quality Programming. Recognizing the value of preschool education to the later success of children in poverty, LRSD has dedicated district funds to implement preschool programs in all elementary schools except the four Magnet schools. Every year the District's preschool programs have achieved quality status, and DCCECE can be assured that LRSD will continue to provide the high quality preschool programming that is currently being offered on a limited basis. High Interest. The high quality preschool programs offered by LRSD has resulted in numerous requests for placement. At any given time during the year, there are as many as 500 students waiting placement in the District's preschool program .. Limited Local Resources. For the past several years, the district has offered preschool programming to more than 1000 preschool children (approximately 53 classrooms of four-year-olds and HIPPY) with funding that is little more than the level of district match funding that will be required of the ABCSS FY2004-05 grant. The District is anticipating increasing the number of children served in both the center-based and home-based programs to 1429 (approximately 20 new classrooms), including the children to be served through the continuation grant. Even though the district has diligently dedicated local funds to preschool programs for several years, the funding has not been sufficient to provide preschool placement for all children and with the level of implementation that the District desires. In addition, NCLB has required the District to redirect funds 6 to providing additional services for students in Grades K-12, therefore, impacting the amount of District funding that is available for preschool expansion. VIII. Status of Elementary Schools Regarding Percent (%) of Children Proficient in Math and Literacy on 4th Grade Benchmark Exam Little Rock School District will be requesting funding for the following schools with the highest priority for funding (3 or 2): Bale, Baseline, Brady, Chicot, Cloverdale, Dodd, Fair Park, Franklin, King, Mabelvale, Rockefeller, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington, Watson, Wilson, and Woodruff. In the schools with a priority ranking of 3 or 2, the average percent of students performing on below proficient on the 2002 and 2003 administration of the Primary Benchmark Exam in literacy was 54% and math was 68%, with averages ranging from 77% and 83% below proficiency, respectively in literacy and math, to 33% and 53% respectively. A table of the assessment data is attached. (See Appendix B.) IX. School Improvement Status Of the 25 schools for which the district is making application, sixteen (16) are in school improvement and include the following: Bale (Year 2), Baseline, Brady, Chicot (Year 3), Cloverdale, Dodd, Fair Park, Franklin, King, Mabelvale, Rockefeller, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington, Watson, and Wilson. x. Academic Distress Status: not applicable XI. Percentage of children in the school area receiving free and reduced lunches. In the schools for which the District is making application, the average percent of children who qualify for free and reduced lunch is approximately 75% with the range being from a high of 95% to a low of 21 %. Schools receiving a priority ranking of 2 or 3 for funding have an average poverty level of approximately 82%. Appendix C provides a table of the free and reduced lunch percentages for each school for which the District is making application. 7 -\u0026lt;IJl C:. :::\n~ o\nn zm z\ng no\nn C) ~ ~ m:I: 0 !!l C: C\nnm mz S-\u0026lt; (1)% 0~ Zc (I) a, XII. Number of children currently enrolled in kindergarten in the elementary school The number of kindergarten children enrolled in the elementary schools for which the district is making application is 1480. The total number of Kindergarten children in the District is 2010. XIII. Description of Daily Schedule Center-based Program In compliance with the Arkansas Better Chance Schools and the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, the daily schedule of the LRSD provides a balance of structured and unstructured activities which focus on active learning and time for discovery through play as well as opportunities for small and large group interactions. Schedules reflect a substantial portion of the day in which children are involved in free choice center activities while participating daily for an additional hour in outdoor play. It is the goal of the Little Rock School District to establish consistent routines allowing for smooth transitions between daily events in order to meet individual needs of children. HIPPY Program Homebased Educators who reside in target neighborhoods are trained to teach the HIPPY curriculum to parents of three and four year old children. Each Homebased Educator is assigned 27 families and visits each family's home every week for one hour to instruct parents in the use of the learning material. Parents are required to attend a monthly group meeting where they meet with their Homebased Educator one and one half hours to review curriculum, look at the materials covered in the previous weeks and discuss individual progress. Parents who attend group meetings are exempt from a home visit on that particular week. XIV. Match/Integration of Funding Sources The Little Rock School District ensures that the required district match funding (40%) will be provided to support implementation of a high quality preschool program in all schools and in the HIPPY program. District funds will be allocated and used in the following ways: 8 Title I funds will be used in ABCSS schools to: Purchase classroom materials Provide professional development opportunities District operating funds will be used in ABCSS schools to: Purchase classroom materials Employ personnel to supervise and provide technical assistance Provide costs of maintenance and operation Provide office supplies and copier expenses Provide costs of the online assessment required of the project Library Media Funds will be used in ABCSS schools to: Purchase books to support classroom libraries Purchase materials for shared reading LRSD Division of Curriculum and Instruction will use district funds to employ personnel to assist in the folloPwroivnigd:e follow-up professional development in the form of modeling and technical assistance to support implementation of Pre-ELLA and Early Childhood Benchmark Training. Provide monitoring of the implementation of Pre-ELLA training Provide technical assistance for state monitoring for Quality Assurance Assist and monitor the administration of the required assessments Analyze data to assist Pre K teachers and principals in instructional decision making and in program evaluation 9 !.-.\u0026gt;.. s a, 8 ::.. \u0026gt; 8 :-s 0z VI .... a, C: . ~~ 0\na zm z~ no\na C) ~~ m:11: ~ ~ C: C :am mz s-\u0026lt; V, ::c 0~ ZC v, CD LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 SOUTH PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 May 20, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Rene' Carson, Middle Level Science Specialist Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Adoption of Health Textbooks Short Summary - The Board is asked to approve the selection of new health books for the 2004-05 scheol year. Objectives - 1) to replace the existing textbook used in the high school, which is approximately 10 years old, with a current and very appealing health textbook, 2) to add a grade appropriate textbook for the sixth grade health program, 3) to add a health focus with an appropriate textbook in the fifth grade program. Expected Outcomes - The health program of the district will be improved and strengthened by the replacement of the textbook used in the high schools. Since the change to the middle school concept, there has not been an appropriate health book for the sixth grade health program. The previous book was used in the eighth grade program. The new textbook is developmentally appropriate for our sixth grade students. Health will be added to the science curriculum in the fifth grade. Instruction about the body systems will be an added as part of the fifth grade curriculum so our students will be better prepared for the Benchmark Science Exam to be given in 2006-07. Population - Health is offered as a senior high elective for a half unit of credit. Students may choose health as an elective in grades 9-12. In middle school, health is offered in sixth grade as a companion to physical education. The students receive a semester of health instruction and a semester of physical education. Health has not been offered in elementary school for the last several years as a separate course. The science curriculum does not cover the body systems, and adding health to the existing science curriculum will strengthen our students' understanding of their bodies. Budget Amount/Source of Budget - Each high school will need approximate 350 health textbooks. Each middle school will need 2 class sets for the sixth grade classes. Each elementary school will need a class set of books for each fifth grade classroom. ~.... E a, 8 ::.. \u0026gt; 8 :!l 0z fJ) 0 ~ C: 0\n,:,m mz S-\u0026lt; U,::C 0~ Zo U\u0026gt;a, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 SOUTH PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 May 20, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Rene' Carson, Middle Level Science Specialist Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Adoption of Health Textbooks Short Summary - The Board is asked to approve the selection of new health books for the 2004-05 scheol year. Objectives - l) to replace the existing textbook used in the high school, which is approximately 10 years old, with a current and very appealing health textbook, 2) to add a grade appropriate textbook for the sixth grade health program, 3) to add a health focus with an appropriate textbook in the fifth grade program. Expected Outcomes- The health program of the district will be improved and strengthened by the replacement of the textbook used in the high schools. Since the change to the middle school concept, there has not been an appropriate health book for the sixth grade health program. The previous book was used in the eighth grade program. The new textbook is developmentally appropriate for our sixth grade students. Health will be added to the science curriculum in the fifth grade. Instruction about the body systems will be an added as part of the fifth grade curriculum so our students will be better prepared for the Benchmark Science Exam to be given in 2006-07. Population - Health is offered as a senior high elective for a half unit of credit. Students may choose health as an elective in grades 9-12. In middle school, health is offered in sixth grade as a companion to physical education. The students receive a semester of health instruction and a semester of physical education. Health has not been offered in elementary school for the last several years as a separate course. The science curriculum does not cover the body systems, and adding health to the existing science curriculum will strengthen our students' understanding of their bodies. Budget Amount/Source of Budget- Each high school will need approximate 350 health textbooks. Each middle school will need 2 class sets for the sixth grade classes. Each elementary school will need a class set of books for each fifth grade classroom. ~.... s Ill 8\n,\n: \u0026gt; 8 ~ 0z U) -c\u0026lt;:: :I ll ~~ o\n:o zm z\ng no\n:oG'l ~~ m 31: !\"' !!l C 0\n:om mz s--\u0026lt; U)::,: 0~ ZO U) a, Manager - Rene' Carson, Middle Level Science Specialist Duration - These textbooks will be used until the next health adoption in the state textbook cycle. Long Range/Continuation - NI A Other Agencies Involved - NI A Expectation of District - The district should expect quality health instruction from the teachers of the health program. The textbook for the program will be an excellent resource for the teachers and will provide up-to-date information for our students. Needed Staff - NIA Comments - The health and wellness of our students has been on the news more this year than in previous years. Legislation was passed that required the Body Mass Index of students be taken and sent home to help educate the parents about the needs and current state of their children's health. Obesity in our children is an increasing problem and should be addressed in our health and physical education curriculum. An outstanding health education program is an essential element of our District's curriculum. Recommendations - Fifth Grade- Your Health. Harcourt, 2003 Edition Sixth Grade - Teen Health, Course I, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, Red, 2003 Edition Senior High Health Program - Health, Glencoe/McGraw Hill, 2003 Edition Committees Fifth and Sixth Grade Health Debbie Hipps - Booker Arts Magnet Irish Williams - Fulbright Elementary Donna Corrothers - Otter Creek Elementary Karen Koepple - Henderson Middle School Damian Patterson - Pulaski Heights Middle School Andrew Logan - Dunbar Magnet School Marvin Burton - Principal, Henderson Middle School Sue Strickland - Board Representative Senior High Health Committee JoAnne McLendon - Central High School Darryl Seward - Central High School Barbara Mathis - Parkview Magnet School John Daniel - Hall High School Dr. Linda Brown - Principal, Parkview Magnet School Larry Berkeley - Board Representative Rene' Carson - Ex-officio member Sharrell Tate - Ex-officio member To: From: Through: Subject: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION 7701 SCOTT HAMILTON DRIVE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72209 May 20, 2004 Board of Directors Carol Green, Director, Career-Technical Education Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Textbook Adoption Recommendation Family and Consumer Science Industrial Technology Education Short Summary - The Board is asked to approve the textbooks recommended for adoption in the areas of Family Consumer Science grades 7-12 and Industrial Technology Education grades 7-9. Objectives - To adopt textbooks as recommended for the adoption period of 2005-2010 Expected Outcomes - Students will have access to the most recent published textbooks and supplemental materials. Population - All Little Rock School District students enrolled in Family and Consumer Science courses and Industrial Technology courses. Budget Amount/Source of Budget - Little Rock School District and magnet schools textbook budgets Manager(s) - Carol Green, Director, Career-Technical Education Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Sharrell Tate, Textbook Coordinator Duration - This adoption is proposed for the period of July, 2004 - June, 2010 Committee Members - Maureen Pierce, Teacher, Central High Shannah Ellender, Teacher, Central High Evelyn Callaway, Teacher, J .A. Fair Kat Sherbett, Teacher, J.A. Fair Liz Lucker, Teacher, Hall High JoAnn Arrington, Teacher, Hall High Gertie Jackson, Teacher, Dunbar Middle Annithia Harris, Teacher, Cloverdale Middle Pat Carr, Teacher, Forest Heights Middle Michelle Vire, Teacher, Mabelvale Middle !.J.\u0026gt;, z \u0026gt;z n\ni! UI 0 ~ C: 0\ncm mz S--\u0026lt; UI :X: 5~ Zo UI Cl Brenda Byrd, Teacher, Pulaski Heights Middle Joyce Asberry, Teacher, Southwest Middle Ex-Officio Members - Carol Green, Director Dr. Katherine Mitchell, Board of Director Sharrell Tate, Textbook Coordinator Long Range/Continuation - Textbook adoptions are submitted during the state adoption period. Other Agencies Involved - N/ A Expectations of Staff - Teachers are expected to utilize textbook in instructional delivery as required per curriculum frameworks and Arkansas Department of Workforce Education standards. Needed Staff - NI A Comments - Textbooks were reviewed by the review team composed of all Family and Consumer Science middle and high school teachers. Teachers also attended the State Textbook Caravan on March 11 th, to review textbooks and discuss textbook information with vendors. The CareerTechnical Education Director, as well as Little Rock District Textbook Coordinator attended the caravan. Textbooks were evaluated on several criteria including state standards, gender bias, multiculturalism, format, technological content, supplementary materials, etc. Recommendations - We recommend the following textbooks for adoption. High School Course Clothing Foods \u0026amp; Nutrition Housing and Design Child Development Parenting Textbook Clothing: Fashion, Fabrics \u0026amp; Construction  2003 Guide to Good Food  2004 Homes: Today and Tomorrow  2002 The Developing Child  2003 Parents and Their Children  2004 Changes and Choices  2000 Consumer Education and Economics  2004 Human Relations Managing Resources Childcare Guidance \u0026amp; Management Services Child and Adult Care Professionals  2004 Nutrition and Wellness Nutrition and Wellness  2004 Family Dynamics Families Today  2004 Family \u0026amp; Consumer Sci. Creative Living  2004 Family \u0026amp; Work Connections-Building Life Skills 2004 Industrial Technology Edu. Technology: Today and Tomorrow  2004 Middle School Family \u0026amp; Consumer Science Discovering Life Skills  2004 Exploring Industrial Technology Introduction To Technology  2003 Grade Level 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 9-12 7-8 7-8 TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT HEALTH SERVICES May 20, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Margo Bushmiaer, Coordinator of Health Services THROUGH: Jo Evelyn Elston, Director, Pupil Services Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent, Administrative Services Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary Schools SUBJECT: Recommendation for Compliance with Act 1220 (2003) Act 1220 is legislation to improve the health of children. Act 1220 defines responsibilities of the Department of Education and the school districts. One component of this law is: Beginning with the 2004-2005 school year, every school district shall: Convene a school nutrition and physical activity advisory committee that shall include members from school district governing boards, school administrators, food service personnel, teacher organizations, parents, students, and professional groups such as nurses and community members. (A) School District Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee The School District Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee shall be structured in a way as to ensure age-appropriate recommendations that correlate to the current grade configuration of the school district 1. This shall be done utilizing at least one of the following options: a. Require each school to establish a School Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee. b. Require subcommittees to be established representing the appropriate age and grade configuration for that school district. c. Require that membership on district committee includes representatives from each appropriate grade level group ( elementary school, middle school, junior high, senior high). .!J.:,l z z\u0026gt; 0 ~ \"' )( ?\u0026lt; ~o ~5 o!!? C: z\no C\u0026gt; z\no Em m:11: Z\u0026gt; ...\no ::0: \"' -\u0026lt;al C:. :::\n~ o\n,:, zm z\ng no\n,:, C\u0026gt; ~~ m I: r\u0026gt; !!l C: 0\n,:,m :ms .z.... u,:,: 5~ ZO \"' cc 2. At a minimum the District Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee will: a. Annually, assess the school nutntton environment of each school campus beginning in school year 2004-2005 utilizing at a minimum the following modules of the School Health Index for Physical Activity, Healthy Eating and a Tobacco-Free Lifestyle available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/SHI/index.htm Module 1: School Health Policies and Environment Module 2: Health Education Module 3: Physical education and other Physical Activity Programs Module 4: Nutrition Services Module 8: Family and Community Involvement The School Health Index is a self-assessment and planning tool that will enable schools to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the school's nutrition and health environment, policies and programs. b. Assure that the School Health Index assessment is included in individual school improvement plans. Schools will document and report improvement in weaknesses noted in their annual School Improvement Plan reports to the District Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee. c. A~sist the school in implementation of Child Nutrition Standards to provide increased healthier options for all foods and beverage sold or served on the school campus. These include all foods and beverages other than those offered as part of reimbursable meals, including vending machines, snack bars, fund-raisers, school stores, class parties and other venues that compete with healthy school meals. d. Maintain and update annually, a list of recommended locally available healthier options for food and beverage sales venues. e. Review and make recommendations to the local school board regarding all food and beverage contracts. f. Maintain a list of non-food and healthy food alternatives for fund raisers. g. The District Committee will assess current physical activity within the school and the community by utilizing standards defined by the National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE). h. The District Committee will develop strategies to meet physical activity standards in the school and community by utilizing standards as defined by the National Association for Sport and Physical Education. 1. Assure that the physical activity standards are included in the school improvement plans. J. Schools will document and report improvement in weaknesses noted in the annual School Improvement Plan report to the District Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisory Committee and the Arkansas Child Health Advisory Committee. I am recommending that the attached committee roster be approved and charged with the responsibilities of compliance with Act 1220 as defined in the legislation. !.J.:1, z \u0026gt;z n ~ \"' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT May 17, 2004 2004 Nutrition I Physical Activity Advisory Committee NAME LOCATION Bushmiaer, Mar20 Coordinator, Health Services Barksdale, Diane Principal, Carver Blaine, Barbara Counselor, Western Hills Brown, Sandra RN, Baptist Health - Community Outreach Buck, Larry Principal, McClellan Burton, Marvin Principal, Henderson Ed2erson, Pat Parent and Student in Colle2e of Public Health Elston, Jo Evelyn Director, Pupil Services Favela, Zaul 11 t \" Grade Student, McClellan High Frasier, Coreen PE Teacher, Rockefeller Gan2oso, Ace 11th Grade Student, Parkview Ma2net Goolsby, Susan ACH Nutritionist/ Parent Kin2 \u0026amp; Mann Green, Sheila Tobacco Prevention Coordinator, Pupil Services Hayman, Kimberly Nurse: Baseline, Geyer Sprin2s, Wakefield Henderson, Julie UALR, Share America, Health Services/ Parent - PHMS Hynes, Stephanie Walker Supervisor, Child Nutrition/ Parent - Mann Islam, Arie Secretary, Athletics/ Parent - McClellan \u0026amp; Cloverdale Middle Kelley, Carla Nurse, Henderson Kni2ht, Katherine Wri2ht Teacher Rep Lacey, Marian Dr. Assistant Superintendent, Administration McCoy, Morlin Director, Child Nutrition Merritt, Re2inald Safe \u0026amp; Dru2 Free Schools Coordinator, Pupil Services Mitchell, Katherine Dr. LRSD Board of Directors Robinson, Tiffany 10th Grade Student, J.A. Fair Hieb Sco2in, Annette Assistant Director, Athletics Shindler, Lindsey 10th Grade Student, Central Hi2h Smith, Paula Romine Parent Wheeler, Gary Dr. Pediatrician, UAMS, ACH /Parent-Central High Williams, Keenan 11th Grade Student, Hall Hi2h LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CARE PROGRAM DATE: MAY 10, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: ...~. artha Rogers,~RE Program Supervisor Jo Evelyn Elsto , irector Pupil Services Junius Babbs, Associate Superintendent THROUGH: Morris Holmes, Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: CARE Program Tuition Fee Increase The CARE Program is a self-supporting before and after school child care program currently provided at twenty two LRSD elementary schools. Care income comes directly from parent tuition, and The Department of Human Services Childcare Vouchers or other programs that provide childcare tuition assistance to parents CARE is seeking approval to raise tuition fees by $15.00 per month or 13.64% for a maximum of $125.00 per month as compared to the current $110.00 per month. In the event that a raise is approved for the 2004/2005 school year, this increase would cover the 2.875% raise plus a 10% raise, three additional school days and one additional staff development day that have been added to the 2004/2005 school calendar. If a lesser raise were approved, CARE would increase tuition fees according to that percentage. The revenue generated by the tuition rate increase would offset the payroll increase. Your approval will allow the CARE Program time to be prepared when the raises are determined. This will help us prepare, print, and mail registration brochures mid-July and flyers and handbooks would be ready for August registration. ~ \u0026gt; a, . C: c!!! oz zm ~~ c5 kl z::o en S n m en .!1.1, z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt; ~ en EXPLANATION OF 13.64% INCREASE IN PAYROLL 200412005 Current CARE Rates Registration fee Before \u0026amp; After School Full day CARE $25 per year $110.00 per month $12.00 per day Proposed CARE Tuition Rate Increase (Other fees would remain the same) Registration fee Before \u0026amp; After School Full day CARE $25.00 per year $125.00 per month $12.00 per day Drop-in $8.00 per day Drop-in $8.00 per day With a !3.64% rate increase, the daily rate would increase from $5.75 to $6.32 per day, an increase of .57 per day. As compared to other child care programs, CARE registration and tuition rates are and have historically been one of the most reasonable in the area. Current Childcare Rates for Local Childcare Centers ( Based on average registration and weekly rates) Registration fee Before \u0026amp; After School Full day CARE Drop-in From $25 to $100 per year $40.00 - 50.00 per week $15.00 - $17.00 $160 - 200.00 per month The Department of Human Services Daily Rate Cap for Before \u0026amp; After School Averaged over 9 months Registration fee Before \u0026amp; After School Full day CARE Drop-in Pre-K OHS does not Pay registration $219.00 per month $17.00 per day School Age OHS does not Pay registration $151.33 per month $15.20 per day The Department of Human Services daily rate cap for before and after school child care is $11.05 per day or $219.00 per month for preschool and $7.65 per day or $151 .33 per month for school age children. Increase in Payroll Estimated Through June 2004. Administrative payroll (includes fringe benefits and FICA) 12.875% Increase CARE Aides payroll (Includes fringe benefits and FICA) 12.875% Increase Three additional school days One additional staff development day 2004-2005 Total CARE payroll increase for 2004/2005 13.64% Tuition Fee Increase in revenue $314,500 X 12.875% $ 40,492 $478,657 X 12.875% $ 61,627 $ 8,550 $ 4,200 $ 12,750 $114,869 $127,534 Increasing tuition $15.00 per month would generate $1271534 in additional revenue and therefore offset the payroll increase of $114. 869. A lesser percentage would be used based on the actual raise if less than 10%. We request Board approval of this recommendation as submitted. \u0026gt;CD . C: 0!! oz zm ~~ ~ Kl Z\na:, en:s 0 m en !..I,' z \u0026gt;z 0 ,\u0026gt;.. en r\u0026gt; ~ C: 0\na:,m mz :s .... en::c o\u0026gt; zZ enO OJ 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-3580 E-mail: linda.watson@lrsd.org TO: Board of Education FROM: Linda Watson, Ed. D. LINDA WATSON, Ed. D. ASSIST ANT SUPERINTENDENT STUDENT DISCIPLINE Fax: (501) 447-3581 SUBJECT: 2004 - 2005 Student Handbook Revisions The attached represents the recommendations for the revision of the 2004 - 2005 Student Handbook. The old information is presented in regular type and the new or recommended revisions are presented in bold type. The information that is being deleted is presented with a strike through. The administration is recommending the approval of the revisions. DRAFT 2004-2005 STUDENT HANDBOOK REVISIONS SAFE AND UNSAFE SCHOOLS Pursuant to the requirements of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation, the following information is to be provided to parents: Safe Schools Safe schools are those where students, staff members and visitors feel safe and welcome and have the opportunity to learn, teach, work, and engage in activities without being threatened, intimidated, bullied, harassed, or made the victim of crime. Such schools provide an environment in which students are challenged academically, respected and supported socially and emotionally by peers and staff, held accountable for their actions, and able to work without fear. Perhaps, most importantly, a safe school is one where students are connected and feel a part of the school. This broad definition of a safe school extends the concept of safety beyond the realm of physical well-being to include the related areas of social climate and order. Unsafe Schools For the purpose of NCLB, the definition of a persistently dangerous public school implies a pattern of unsafe behaviors as demonstrated over time, not just a single event. The committee recommended a period of two consecutive years, during which the following are evidenced, establishes the condition of \"persistently unsafe.\" A school would be considered persistently dangerous if the following conditions are observed: 1. For each year during the past two consecutive years, the school has had a federal or state gun-free school violation as allowed by the USC and/or Arkansas Criminal Code Annotated, or at least one violent criminal offense has been committed on school property (Violent criminal offense means homicide, rape, robbery and/or aggravated assault), and 2. For each year during the past two consecutive years, the school has experienced expulsions for drugs, alcohol, weapons or violence that exceeds 3% of the total school population as reported on October 1st of each year. NOTE: If a school is designated as an unsafe school, students will have an opportunity to transfer to another school where there is space. STUDENT CONDUCT CODE- ELEMENTARY STUDENTS Rule 10: Failure to Follow Bus Rules and Regulations All school rules and regulations governing student behavior apply to conduct on the school bus and at bus stops. If a student misbehaves on a bus or at a bus stop, he/she will receive a disciplinary sanction as it is outlined in the Student Handbook. NOT PERMITTED  Eating and drinking on the bus  Smoking  SoufQi11g or iighti11g  Playing radios, tape players or band instruments 0 Yelling at anyone on the bus or outside the bus  Throwing paper or any object on the floor of the bus or outside the window  Putting hands, arms or head out windows  Tampering with any of the bus safety devices  Defacing any part of a bus OTE: THE OFFENDER WILL PAY FOR DAMAGE TO A 'Y Bl S EQUIPMENT. EXCEPTION TO MINIMUM PENAL TIES l. A otulio11t , he poooeoooo light@ro, light@r Auili0 a11cl.'er Acu,ooablo pPoli1t0t0, 8tfl@lrn0, uo@o a11, tobaeeo proliuet, or uo00 aR, illiigal clrugo on a b1to, r: ho ph, oieall, or , o,eall, abuo@o a \\mo 1fri, e,, er eommito an aet of , anlialiom eauoing liamag@ to a bus shall not b@ p@Ffflitt@li to Filie a 00hool euo in tho Littlo Roelt Eohool Qi0tfi@t f@r a mi1tim1tm ofniR@ @@Its. ln aliditien, th@ paronti'guarliian ofa ohtlient 11he damagoo a oehool bus ::ill bo ,equi,od to r@imburo@ the Qiotriet for tho ooot ofrnpai,ing tho damag@ bof@r0 th@ traRopertation p,i, il@go io rootornli. m tho o, ont ef a ooeond eff@no@ of an, on@ eftho aeov0, a owdont r: ill bi! doniod tranopertation f@r tho romaind@r of tho oehool term. ~ 1. As a last resort, the Transportation Department may discontinue a bus route when a large number of students who ride the bus refuse to obey the regulations. If it becomes necessary for school personnel to consider eliminating a bus route because of continued misconduct by students, except in extreme circumstances, parents will be contacted by letter or telephone to inform them of the situation. A meeting with parents/guardians and school personnel will be arranged to discuss the circumstances and to consider possible solutions. 2. All regulations and sanctions pertaining to student behavior and safety that apply during the school day are applicable to students while they are riding buses to and from school. ~M\u0026gt; (\n: ( 'untinurcl rni1 htha iur nn tht 1 t'h11nl hu 1,\" ill rt tt# inn lo,,, oftran,,fHlrhttion pri ilegt!!,-. Wfl-t~~M==t-h-~ rtctnattKlt1r o+=Utl' '1t'mt 1,1t1r ur t.rhoul _:'t:UJ', '\\ote: Repeated \\'iolations of Category I Olfrmes \"ill result in the student being charged under Ruic :? I -\\. Category :?. !D .., z \u0026gt;z n \u0026gt;..... en \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; ~n EO o!!! c:Z :,\n,C., Z:,\n, :il:m m\ni: Z\u0026gt; \"\"\":,\n, ~ en STUDENT CONDUCT CODE - MIDDLE AND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Rule 8: Smoking or Use of Smokeless Tobacco Smoking or possession of matches, lighters, lighter fluids and/or tobacco products of any kind on school district property, at school-related activity or on the school bus is prohibited. (Arkansas Code 5-78-101-102) First Offense: Enrollment in, and completion of, a smoking education program. Enrollment documentation is required. ~ Two days in-school suspension for failure to complete the program. Second Offense: Enrollment in, and completion of, a smoking education program. Enrollment documentation is required.~ Four days in-school suspension and probation. ote: A student found in possession of matches, lighters, lighter fluids and/or flammable products on school buses will be required to attend a student/ parent/ administrator conference within 24 hours of the incident. Rule 10: Failure to Follow Bus Rules and Regulations All school rules and regulations governing student behavior apply to conduct on the school bus and at bus stops. If a student misbehaves on a bus or at a bus stop, he/she will receive a disciplinary sanction as it is outlined in the Stude11t Ha11dbook. NOT PERMITTED  Eating and drinking on the bus  Smoking  S euftling 8F HgffliRg  Playing radios, tape players or band instruments  Yelling at anyone on the bus or outside the bus  Throwing paper or any object on the floor of bus or outside the window  Putting hands, arms or head out windows  Tampering with any of the bus safety devices  Defacing any part of a bus\n\\OTE: THE OFFE:\\DER WILL PA\\' FOR DA\\lAGE TO A \"i\\' B\\'S EQl'IP\\IE:\\T. These rules are set to ensure that the students riding a bus m the Little Rock School District are transported as safely as possible and are, at the same time, provided a pleasant trip to their destination. STUDENT CONDUCT CODE - MIDDLE SCHOOL AND SENIOR ffiGH STUDENTS EXCEPTIO TO MINIMUM PENALTIES 1. A otuti@nt urho poooooooo lightoro, lighter th1itio enti/or flemmeblo p1'0tiueto, omolrno, uooo ens tobee88 protiuet, or uooo ens illogel srugo one buo, who phyoieelly or\n1erbelly e@uoeo e l\n,uo dri, er, or BOR'lfmto en eet of , entielioM eeuoing tiemege to e buo ohell not b@ pem1itteti to fitie e oehool buo in the Jsittle Roelt School Qiotriet fore rninimurn of nine .,.Hilo. ht eetiition, tho pe,ene\u0026lt;~ereien efe otuti0nt II ho tiemegoo e oehool buo\n1ill be ,011uiroti to ,eimi\niu,oo d~o QiotJ:iet for tho GOot offepeiring tho eemogo b0fo,o the tJ:enoportetion privilege io rcoto!'oti. 1H tho o  llnt ofe ouonti off@no@ of ens on11 ofth11 ebovo, e otutient ill I\n,@ eonieti trenoportetion for tho romeintio, oftho o@hool toflfA . .!.. 1. As a last resort, the Transportation Department may discontinue a bus route when a large number of students who ride the bus refuse to obey the regulations. If it becomes necessary for school personnel to consider eliminating a bus route because of continued misconduct by students, except in extreme circumstances, parents will be contacted by letter or telephone to inform them of the situation. A meeting with parents/guardians and school personnel will be arranged to discuss the circumstances and to consider possible solutions.\n. 2. All regulations and sanctions pertaining to student behavior and safety that apply during the school day are applicable to students while they are riding buses to and from school. 1,l,'AIU'ING: \u0026lt;?ontinu@d ntisbelta\\'ior on the o@ltool lrno will result in a loos of transportation pri\\ilogoo, temporarily or for tlte renteinder of tlte seme,\nter or u@ltool year. ote: Repeated violations of Category I Offenses will result in the student being charged under Rule 218, Category 2. !..I,I z  zn\ni! \"' \u0026gt;\u0026lt; ?\u0026lt; ~n ~5 o!!! C: z\na C) Z\na 31::m m31:: Z)\u0026gt; ....\na\n,i\n\"' STUDENT CONDUCT CODE - MIDDLE AND SENIOR IDGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Rule 14: Gambling Playing a game of chance for something of value will not be tolerated. All funds that are not claimed will be confiscated and deposited in school's Activity Fund. First Offense: Suspension: 3-5 days and probation (regular schedule schools) Suspension: 4-6 days and probation (block schedule schools) Second Offense: Long-term suspension recommendation Rule 26A. Possession/Use of Paging Devices ~tltlfltlP!i), Cellular Phones and/or Other Electronic Communication Devices The use or possession of a beeper or other electronic communication device (CD, MP3, DVD) on a school campus, a school bus or at a school-related activity, during the regular school day, is prohibited, except when they are required for medical reasons. Medical documentation must be on file with the student's administrator and school nurse. (Arkansas Codes 6-17-113 and 6-18-502) First Offense: Warning, confiscation of the device and parent conference. Second Offense: Suspension: 5 days and probation (regular schedule schools) Suspension: 6 days and probation (block schedule schools) Third Offense: Long-term suspension recommendation Rule 39: Extortion/Robbery Obtaining or attempting to obtain money or property from an individual by force or threat of force is prohibited. (Arkansas Code 6-18-502 and 6-17-113) DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS/PROCEDURES Student/Parent Reinstatement Conference When a student is being short-term suspended, a conference should be held with the parent/guardian and the student to seek resolution of the misconduct and to consider the reinstatement requirements. The parent/guardian and administrator should agree on a mutually satisfactory time for the conference. If the parent/guardian does not request a conference by the end of the suspension, the appropriate administrator shall initiate contact. The building administrator may select an alternative means for a reinstatement conference if the parent/guardian is unable to attend. Students who have been in an alternative, residential- or day-treatment, and other educational faclllty must be reinstated by the Student Hearing Office. .!l.:,J z z\u0026gt; n ~ UJ )( ?\u0026lt;\n,..n ~o co!!z?\n,\n, C) z\n,\n,\nl:m m\n1: Z\u0026gt; -\u0026lt;\n,\n, =\"' UJ POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ANTI-BULL YING Consequences for Violation of This Policy By Students in Grades 6-12 First Offense: The student or students who are the\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1041","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-04"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1041"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["141 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nDNIHOllNOW N011~93H93S30 :!0331:l:JO ~ooz I z ~dv 03A 03~ Agenda RECEIVED OFFICE OF DESEGREGATIO ONITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting / APR 2 2 04 ci:FICE OF DESEGREGATI ITO. I G I\n.,. April 2004 n-.. .,\u0026gt;. .. \",m..'. ,... - .... :I: Oz o\u0026gt; \"C'-\"\u0026lt;' m-..\n,:,c: -z\n,:,n o,...\" i\"5' r-z nm \u0026gt; F .., \"0 ' n :em me ,... C: on,.~.. ffiJ :l m ill !X\u0026gt; i n \"\"'' ,... \"..,' \"n'\"o' - 3: \u0026gt;n :::. p::\nzm \"' \u0026lt;\n,c \u0026gt;,,.  ~ c:,\n,c o \u0026gt; I! \"c' c... 31:3: ml!: 31: c c:,\nz rn r \".,,'\"_ c\nz Cl I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING April 22, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Update: OCR Compliance Review - Final Report V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes B. Personnel Changes VI. SCHOOL SERVICES: A. 2004 Summer Educational Programs n -c ,\u0026gt;.. .. .,\nm.o.. ,.... _ _, 3C Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\no C: -z\non 0 _, ,.... c5 r-z \u0026gt;n \"' F :a:, \u0026gt;m i:nc3 C~: _:a,:, 111 n\no :::\nm ,.n :::!8 Oz Z:::\n\"'o z \"' !X' i n. ::\no,,: U) r- ..,\no\no no _, 3C \u0026gt;n :::\n,::\nm z U) Regular Board Meeting April 22, 2004 Page2 VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Regulation: GBEA-R - Conflict of Interest B. Dedication of Right of Way: Parkview Magnet High School C. Donations of Property D. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions IX. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS X. ADJOURNMENT (\")\"D .\u0026gt;\nJmtl ,- rr...-.. :-1: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\nJ0 C: -z\n,oC\"\u0026gt; 0 ..... ,- c5 r-z (\")U\u0026gt; \u0026gt; F \"D g :m1:mo ,- C: (\") $! 0,- ,i\n~ ::1 m\nJ0 \"'\nJ0 \u0026gt;m  \"D cno C:\nJ0 ~ ..... -1!! (\")\nJO =q:q ~8 Oz z =l \"'\n\"' ?'\nJ0 m ~ (\")\nJO .\n,c ,- .\".',\nJtl\n,o C\"\u0026gt;O .... !I: \u0026gt;n =\u0026lt; p:\n~ \"' I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS C. LRCTA IV . Kt.l'\\JKll\u0026gt;/\\.UNIN\\UN~AIIUN:\u0026gt; A. BOARD MEMBERS '54.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: April 22, 2004 Board of Directors (il ~ Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Off~ Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Bill Goodman~ April 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects The construction projects at Mabel vale Magnet Middle, Mann Magnet Middle and Williams Magnet Elementary have been completed and the staff and students have moved into the additions and remodeled rooms. However, some work is ongoing mainly to address construction deficiencies (\"punch lists\" items) that are a part of all construction projects. I hope you have an opportunity to visit all or some of these schools. You will be pleased with the results. An architectural firm has been selected for the remodeling of the original buildings at Forest Heights Middle School that were constructed in 1956. One objective is to improve the appearance of the school from Evergreen Street. As this project develops, I will keep you informed of the details of this objective. Please call me at 447-1146 if you have any questions. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501 -324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 .!J,:,I m\n,\n, ~ zz ,m-n ~z Cl m rn !\" \u0026gt; C C :::. 0\n,\n, rn i!ll c3 ~ .:.\". Pl :c C\ng ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD APRIL 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Facilitv Name Project Description I Est. Comple11on Cost Date Baseline Renovation $953,520 , Jul-04 Brady Addition/renovation I $973,621 7 Aug-04 Central Renovation - Interior I $10,200,2661 Aug-05 Dunbar Renovation/addition I $6,149,0237 Dec-04 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music ' J. A. Fair jroom a dd1\".ll on $ 3,155,640 May-04 McClellan Classroom Addition I $2,155,622 , Jul-04 Parkview Addition $2,121,226 I Jun-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1,193,259 ' Aug-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 Aug-04 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 I Aug-04 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 ' Jul-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SPRING/ SUMMER 2004 I Est. compTel1on Facilitv Name Proiect Descriotion Cost Date Booker Roof $48,525 Aug-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms TBD _ Aug-04 Central Reflecting Pond $50,000 Aug-04 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area I $225,000\nAug-04 Chicot Drainage I $64,700 1 Aug-04 Chicot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm $53,919 1 Aug-04 Geyer Springs Roof Repair : $161,752 Aug-04 Henderson Lockers $80,876 A~ Mitchell Building Remediation $165,000 May-04 Mitchell ______ !Renovation I $2,212,493 Aug-05 VVestern Hills ADA Rest rooms $15,000 ~4 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name Proiect Descriotion 1---c,B_o_o.,k...er_ ______- +E~lec~tric_a_l_U,pgrad_e_ ____ Booker Roof Booker ADA Rest rooms Carver Media Center Expansion Chicot Electrical Upgrade Chicot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm Cloverdale Ecl.e.::.:m..c:.ce:.:n..c.t.:a.=1.:r.Ly.__ __,..cA...:.d:::cd:.:i..tci.o.:'-n_ ______ Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade Fair Park !Addition Forest Heights Remodel I I I -r I I l Garland _-=_-=_-=_-=__- Remodel ---------- Geyer Springs Roof Repair Gibbs Addition Henderson Mablevale McDermott Meadowcliff Pulaski Hgts. MS Rightsell Washington Western Hills Western H-ills- -- Western Hills Woodruff --COC-kers Fire Alarm Upgrade Fire Aiarmupgrade Addition Energy monitoring system installation Renovation Fire Alarm Upgrade Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC Fire Alarm Upgrade ADA Rest rooms Parkino addition Cost I Est. Completion Date Unknown $48,525 TBD Unknown Unknown $53,919 Unknown TBD Unknown ' $1,400,000 Unknown $161,752 Unknown $80,876 TBD TBD Unknown Unkn~ $2,494,000 TBD $640-:000-- TBD TBD $193 ,777 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Aug-06 Unknown . Aug-05 Unknown Unknown Unknown .!.\",' m\n-, z~ z ,m.. n :c \u0026gt;z C) m u, rn \u0026gt; C 0 ::::\n0\n-, u, .~., 0 ~ :\"' ..... m n :c C ~ ~ m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD APRIL 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description Cost I t::st. c.\nomple11on Date Administration I Asbestos abatement $380,495 I Mar-03 Administration I Fresh air system I $55,ooo I Aug-03 Administration I Fire alarm I $32,350 Aug-03 Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation I Mav-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy monitoring system installation I $15,160 I Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. I Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 I Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale i Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale I Energy monitoring system I Mar-02 Bale I Partial roof replacement I $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 l Aug-01 Booker Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Booker I Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady  Energy efficient lighting $80,593 Sep-02 Brady I Asbestos abatement I $345,072  Aug-02 Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 I Mav-01 Carver Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Central Parking I Student parking $174.000. I Aug-03 Central/Quigley \\Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 I Aug-03 Central/Quigley I Irrigation System $14,500 Aug~03 Central Purchase land for school I Unknown Dec-02 --- r- $2,000,000 - Central Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations Dec-02 --- Central Ceiling and wall repair I $24,000 ---- -Oc-t-0-1 Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation I $80,876 Aug-Q_1_ -- --rront landing tile repair --- Central - $22,470 __ Aug-01 ~ rgy efficient lighting -- Cloverdale Elem. $132,678 Jul-01 -- ---- Energy efficient ligh~ --- -- $189,743 -- Cloverdale MS Jul-01 --- --- - --- Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd -- Energy efficient lighting -r - - $90,665 __ Aug.:Q_1_ Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile __ $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd ~ lace roof top HVAC T $215,570 --Aug-02 Facilities Service Interior renovation --- - I $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services _ Fire alarm -- $12,000 __ Aug-03 HVAC renovation/fire alarm - Fair Park - $315,956 Apr-02 Fair Park -- - Energy efficient lighting $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceiling -- - $59,310 Aug-01 J. A. Fair ----- ~ rgy efficient lighting -- - $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair - Press box -- - $10J84 Nov-00 - ~ urity cameras - J. A. Fair - - $12,500 Jun-01 ~ hletic Field Improvement $38,000 - J. A. Fair Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System - $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs - $39(871 Aug-03 Forest Park R eplace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Nov-03 Forest Park Diagonal parking - $111 ,742 Aug-03 Forest Park E- nergy efficient lighting - $119,788 May-01 Fulbright Energy efficient lighting $134,463 Jun-01 Fulbright Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,950 Aug-01 - - Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright - - ~ king lot -- ~ $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbright ~ of repairs $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin Renovation $2,511 ,736 Mar-03 Gibbs - Energy efficient lighting - $76,447 Apr-01 -+- Gibbs Energy monitorina svstem installation $11 ,770 Jul-01 2 .fD., m\n,\n, is zz ,m- (\") ~ C) m U\u0026gt; !\"' \u0026gt; C: C =i 0\n,\n, U\u0026gt; ~ ~ ~ :\" --\u0026lt; m (\") :i:: C: ~ ?. m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD APRIL 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement , $168,222 i Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting I $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting I $296,707 I Apr-01 Hall Infrastructure improvements I $93,657 Aug-01 Hall I Intercom I I Feb-01 Hall Security cameras ! $10,600 ' Jun-01 Henderson Energy efficient lighting : $193,679 i Jul-01 Henderson Roof replacement gym I $107,835 May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 I Aug-01 Henderson  Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 1 Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 Oct-01 Jefferson I Renovation \u0026amp; fire- al~a-rm_ __ -- ~ $1,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot ------~$26_9~,58_8 _____ J_u_l--o--'1 Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-0t Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units $300,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting $106,598 1 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS ,Renovate bleachers $134,793 . Aug-01 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851,621 ' Mar-04 Mann Partial Replacement $11,500,000 Apr-04 1-M_a_n_n_ _______.\n..A._sc.p1._hal_t w_alks _________- 1 The total $1 _8 million I Dec-01 ,--M_a_n_n_ _______- --,W_a_lk_w_a~1y_c_a_n_op~iies_ _______ __, is what has been ,__ __D_e c_-_0_,1 Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the Oct-01 Mann ~F_e_n_c_in~g ___________ -\u0026lt; projects listed I----- Sep-01 Mann Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan I Irrigation System $14,750 Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras $36,300 McClellan Energy efficient lighting $303,614 McClellan I Stadium stands repair $235,000 McClellan Intercom $46,000 McDermott I Energy efficient lighting $79,411 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 Meadowcliff Fire alarm ------ $16,175 Meadowcliff Meadowcliff Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Mitchell Mitchell Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Parkview Parkview Parkview Parkview Parkview Parkview --------- Asbestos abatement _ $253,412 Engergy efficient lighting ___ ~ _ $88,297 Replace cooling tower $37,203 Replace shop vent system - $20,000 - Energy monitoring s stem installation $17,145 ~ efficient lighting -- : $103,642 Energy monitoring system installation . $16,695 Asbestos abatement $13,000 - HVAC renovation Energy monitoring system installation Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement Parking lot 6 classroom addition Parking Improvements ~controls -- Roof replacement Exterior lights HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls Locker replacement Enerav efficient liahtina $237,237 $10,695 $81,828 $10,000 $138,029 $888,778 $142,541 $210,000 _ $273,877 $10,784 $301,938 $120,000 $315,000 Jun-01 Ma -01 Aug-01 Feb-02 Feb-01 Aug-02 Jul-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Dec-00 May-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 May-01 Apr-01 Aug-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Aug-03 Jun-02 Sep-01 Nov-00 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jun-01 3 !XI ~ m\n:c ~ zz ,m... C') :c \u0026gt;z G) m (/) !\" \u0026gt; C: 0 =. 0\n:c (/) ~ ~ 0 :!l CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD APRIL 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Proiect Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Procurement Enen:iy monitoring system installation $5,290 Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm $25,ooo l Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground I $17,ooo I Dec-02 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting $84,898 Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting I $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace rooftop HVAC I $539,1751 Aua-01 Rockefeller Parking addition $111,742 I Aug-02 Romine Asbestos abatement $10,000 Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 I Mar-03 Security/Transportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 I Aua-00 Southwest New roof I $690,000 I Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest I Drainage I street widening I $250,000 I Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation I $4,830 T Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aua-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 I Dec-01 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry . Media Center addition $704,932 ---Seo-02 Wakefield Security cameras $a,ooo I Jun-01 Wakefield I Energy efficient lighting $74,776 T Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Nov-02 Washington 1Security cameras $7,900 I Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 - Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868  Aug-01 Watson 1Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills 1Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Mar-04 - Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting --- $122,719 - Jun-01 Wilson IR enovation/expansion $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion $110,000 ~ I - Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Aua-02 4 .!J.,I m :a:, fS z z m rn ! C) m u, !\" \u0026gt; C: 0 =l 0 :a:, u, ~ c3 :!!l Date: April 22, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS To: Board of Directors From: @sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - April This is the fifty-fourth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. .!J,,I m\no ~z z .m... (\") z~ Cl m rn :n .... ~ :c C.. , 0 ?!\nm Audit Report - April 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise.  Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-44 7-1115 . My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. .!D., m\n,:, is zz ,m- C'l :z: \u0026gt;z c\n, m u, :n .... m C'l :z: C ~ ~ m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: April 22, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  May 3, 2004 is a District sponsored professional development day. All sessions on this day will be centered on technology training for teachers. The primary focus will be integrating technology into the curriculum. A few sessions of basic training will be provided for those teachers who need it.  LRSD Technology Center will be completed this summer. Staff from Instructional Technology and from Computer Information Services will be moving out to the new center which is located on the campus of Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. Technology training rooms and a distance learning center will be available for LRSD teachers. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA IA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical March 26 - April 22, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. .~., m\no ~z z .m.... (\") ~z C) m U\u0026gt; Date: To: From: Through: Subject: April 5, 2004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Board of Education Karen E. Broadnax, ESL Supervisor Morris L. Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent Update on the final report on Compliance Review 06995008 conducted by the Office for Civil Rights. Summary: A review of the district's progress reports was submitted to the Little Rock School District on March 18, 2004. The review addressed specific actions taken by the Little Rock School District to ensure the provision of equal educational opportunities and services to national origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient. The report received by the district provided specific details in each on of the compliance areas that OCR has determined that the Little Rock School District has satisfactorily fulfilled the terms specified in the Commitment to Resolve. Objective: To provide an update on the progress to date that the Little Rock School District has made in meeting the terms of the Commitment to Resolve - Compliance Review 06995008. Expected Outcomes: NIA Population: National origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient. :\u0026lt;:\n,o \u0026gt;0  C: 1-::z::! Zm ~I: en~ m\n,o en !JI \"0 m\n,o ~ z z m rn ::c z\u0026gt; C\u0026gt; m en ESL Report to Board April 22, 2004 Page 2 Budget A.mount/Budget Source: ESL Department Manager: Karen E. Broadnax, Supervisor, ESL Department Long range: Continuation of the Little Rock School District ESL Program Other Agencies Involved: NIA Expectations of District: Continuation of the services provided to_national origin language-minority students, who are limited English proficient, to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C.  2000d, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C.  794, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II), 42 U.S.C.  12131-12161, and their implementing regulations. Needed Staff: NIA Comments: None Recommendation: We request that the Board of Education accept this report. !JI \"0 m\n,c ~ zz ,m- C') ~ z C) rn\n,,\n:\n\"'~ C: C') 31::,: ~8\n,c ,- \"0\"' jg m C)\n,c ~~ 31:m en\"' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS SOUTHERN DIVISION , DALLAS OFFICE MAR 1 8 2004 Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Dr. Holmes: Ref: 06995008 The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Southern Division, Dallas Office, has completed a review of the progress reports, which were submitted to OCR by the Little Rock School District (LRSD), Little Rock, Arkansas, to address the specific actions taken by the LRSD to ensure the provision of equal educational opportunities and services to national origin language-minority students who are limited English proficient (LEP). The LRSD voluntarily submitted a Commitment to Resolve (CTR), which was accepted by OCR on September 30, 1999, to ensure compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C.  2000d, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 29 U.S.C.  794, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Title II), 42 U.S.C.  12131- 12161, and their implementing regulations. In the progress reports, the LRSD provided OCR with documentation pertinent to the implementation of the CTR. Based on a review of the progress reports and additional information gathered during the on-site monitoring visits conducted by OCR on December 10- 11, 2002, and March 11-13, 2003, OCR has determined that the LRSD has satisfactorily fulfilled the terms specified in the CTR. Provided below, by commitment provision, is an explanation of how OCR reached this determination: Identification of Students With a Primary Home Language Other Than English The progress reports revealed that, at the beginning of the 1999-2000 school year, the LRSD administered a Home Language Survey (HLS) to all students to identify those students who have a primary (first-learned) or home language (language influence) that is other than English (PHLOTE). In addition, the information revealed that the LRSD directed staff (i.e., principals, counselors, registrars, and secretaries) at every school site and at the Student Assignment Center to secure a completed HLS for all students upon initial emollment. Further, the LRSD developed a procedure that allows for other methods of identifying 1999 BRYAN STREET. SUITE 2600, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 -6810 www.cd.gov Our nusswn IS to ensure equal access to educanon and to promote educarwnal exceUeru:e throughout the nanon. !JI \"D m\n,:, ~ z zm,.. . n ~ z Gl m \u0026lt;J\u0026gt; Page 2 - Dr. Morris Holmes. Interim Superintendent PHLOTE students based on teacher referral, counselor recommendation, and interviews with parents. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Assessment of PHLOTE Students A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed and implemented procedures for assessing PHLOTE students in all four English language proficiency areas (i.e., speaking, reading, writing, and comprehension) to determine which students are LEP. The information reviewed revealed that the LRSD assessed and/or reassessed all PHLOTE students by administering an assessment instrument (i.e., Language Assessment Scales). The information further revealed that the LRSD provided training to all LRSD staff responsible for administering the assessment instrument to ensure proper test administration and interpretation of test scores. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Placement of LEP Students and Ensuring Appropriate Services The progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed and implemented a policy requiring the district to provide alternative language program (ALP) services to LEP students through a research-based English-as-a-Second Language (ESL) program. Information reviewed revealed that PHLOTE students who score at a level 1, 2, and 3 on the Language Assessment Scales (LAS) are identified as LEP and are placed in the ESL program after obtaining consent from the parent/guardian of the student. The information showed that PHLOTE students who score at a level 4, and 5 on the LAS are considered fluent in the English language and are identified as non-LEP and, as a result, are placed in the regular education program. A review of information revealed that the Language Proficiency Assessment Committee (LPAC), which is comprised of at least one or more ESL teachers, a counselor, and a campus administrator, is responsible for making placement decisions. The information revealed that the LRSD provided training to LP AC members as follows: 1) OCR, state, and LRSD laws, policies, and regulations governing LEP programs and services\n2) interpretation of language proficiency assessments\n3) laws and rules governing confidentiality of records\nand 4) procedures for identification, placement, and exiting students from the ALP. The LPAC is responsible for ensuring that the parents of LEP students placed in the ALP receive an explanation of the benefits of the ALP in a language they can understand. The information indicated that the LRSD ensures the delivery of language support services to LEP students whose parents have refused placement in the ALP by providing training to regular education teachers in ESL methodologies and instructional strategies, parental involvement, tutoring, summer school, and by monitoring the academic progress of such students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. .!I.,I m ~ zz ,m.. n ::c \u0026gt;z G) m U\u0026gt; Page 3 - Dr. Morris Holmes. Interim Superintendent Selected Alternative Language Services Model The progress reports revealed that the LRSD selected a research-based English-as-a-SecondLanguage (ESL) program to address the affective, linguistic, and cognitive needs of LEP students at all grade levels. The information showed that the goal of the ESL program is to enable LEP students to master English language skills (i.e., reading, writing, speaking, and listening) and content area concepts and skills so that students are able to participate meaningfully in the regular education program. A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRSD established the same curriculum standards and grade-level/course benchmarks for all students, including LEP students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Staffing and Staff Development The progress reports revealed that the LRSD developed procedures to ensure that the district has appropriate staff to implement the ALP. The information in the progress reports showed that the LRSD made significant progress with respect to the number of teachers who obtained an ESL endorsement through the Arkansas Department of Education's \"ESL Endorsement Program.\" In addition, the information revealed that the LRSD has developed an \"ESL Training Program\" to provide continuous training opportunities for all personnel (e.g., principals, regular education, special education, gifted and talented, etc.) responsible for delivering instruction to LEP students. Specifically, the LRSD provides training to staff on how to adapt the instructional strategies, materials, pacing, and assessments for the delivery of instruction to LEP students. Further, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD designed an appraisal instrument to assess the performance of teachers who deliver ALP services to LEP students. OCR reviewed documentation pertaining to the training provided to administrators on the use of the evaluation instrument and on observation techniques to enable them to identify ESL methodologies. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Materials The LRSD developed procedures to ensure that materials and equipment are appropriate for the implementation of the ALP. The progress report revealed that the LRSD surveyed ALP staff to determine whether there was a need for additional materials and equipment. The information showed that the LRSD provided teachers with materials and equipment, which are appropriate to the curriculum, and comparable in quality, availability, and grade level to the materials provided for the instruction of non-LEP students. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. .!D., m ~\"' z z ,m.... 0 $: z C) m \"' Page 4 - Dr. Morris Holmes. Interim Superintendent Reclassification and Exit The progress reports revealed that the LRSD established and implemented procedures for the exiting, monitoring, and reclassification of LEP students. The information indicated that the criteria employed by the LRSD is based on objective criteria using the LAS test scores in reading, writing, speaking, and comprehension plus other criteria to determine whether students will be able to participate meaningfully in the regular education program. A review of the information showed that a LEP student must score a \"3/4\" or a \"3/5\" or at the Fully English Proficient Level on the LAS post-test prior to exiting the ALP. The information revealed that the LPAC monitors the academic progress of LEP students who exit the ALP for a period of two years to ensure academic success in the regular education program. Specifically, the LPAC ensures that exited students are successfully participating in the regular education program by reviewing the following: I) grades in all core subject areas\n2) teacher observations\n3) counselor comments\nand 4) assessment results. When the LPAC determines that a student needs to re-enter the ESL program, the student is placed back into the ALP after obtaining approval from the parent of the student. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Parental Notice The LRSD developed procedures for providing notice to the parents of PHLOTE students of school activities in a language they can understand. The progress reports revealed that the schools maintain a list of all PHLOTE students whose parents are limited English proficient and require communication in another language. OCR reviewed the documents which have been translated by the LRSD, to include but not limited to the following: Home Language Survey, Notice of School Placement, Notice of ESL Program Services, Notice of Testing Exemption, Exit Letter to Parents, K-8 Curriculum Standards and Grade-Level/Course Benchmarks, Student Rights and Responsibilities Handbooks, Summer School Applications, Parent Involvement Conference Notices, and the LRSD's Parent/Student Handbook. In addition, the information showed that bilingual staff at the schools translated newsletters, notices, letters, and flyers into other languages. Further, the LRSD advertises information in local publications in Spanish. The information showed that the LRSD disseminated a list of translators/interpreters to the school sites. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Special Education The progress reports showed that the LRSD revised its policies and procedures pertaining to the process for referring, identifying, evaluating, and placing LEP students with disabilities. The progress reports revealed that ALP staff and Special Education Department staff share information to ensurethat LEP students with disabilities receive special education and alternative language services concurrently. A review of the progress reports revealed that the !J' \"D m :\u0026lt;I ~ zz ,m... C') $: z C) m UJ ?\"~ UJ C: UJ !ICC') iml::g:c :\u0026lt;1,\" D UJ ~~ C) \u0026lt; ~ r\n~rn Page 5 - Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent LRSD provided training to special education staff (i.e., speech pathologists, resource teachers, and psychological examiners) in ESL methodologies to ensure the proper delivery of both ALP and special education services. Further, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD provides information to parents in a language they can understand pertaining to their rights and procedural safeguards by utilizing an interpreter or by providing information that has been translated into a language they can understand. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Special Opportunity Programs The progress reports revealed that the LRSD implemented procedures to ensure that LEP students are afforded an equal opportunity to participate in the Gifted and Talented (GT) program at the elementary level and in Pre-Advanced Placement and Advanced Placement courses at the secondary level. The information reviewed revealed that the LRSD provided information about the GT program to parents in their native language. In addition, the progress reports revealed that the LRSD staff administered a nonverbal assessment instrument (i.e., Torrance Thinking Creatively) to test LEP students who had been referred for placement in the GT program. The progress reports further revealed that the LRSD provided cultural sensitivity training, training in identifying the characteristics of language minority gifted students, and ESL instructional strategies to LRSD staff. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Program Evaluation and Modification A review of the progress reports revealed that the LRD has adopted procedures to conduct an annual longitudinal performance evaluation of the ALP and make modifications to the ALP based on the results as required by the results of the program evaluation. The information showed that the LRSD evaluated its ALP on an annual basis in which it reviewed the following: 1) curriculum service delivery\n2) materials and resources\n3) staffing and staff development\n4) student academic progress\n5) longitudinal data comparing LEP students to non-LEP students. and LEP students in the program to LEP students not in the program wiL'li respect to academic achievement, attendance, drop-out rate, graduation rate, retention rate, gifted and talented program placement, and special education program placement of LEP, and students who have exited the ALP, and LEP students not served in the ALP. The information showed that the LRSD made the necessary program modifications and improvements as required by the results of each program evaluation. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR and complied with the OCR reporting requirements. Maintenance of Records for LEP Students The progress reports revealed that the LRSD apprised all staff of the importance of maintaining accurate records regarding the implementation of the ALP and documenting actions pertaining to students participating and exiting the ALP. A review of student records .~., m\n,o fS z z ,m... (\") z~ C) m u, Page 6- Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent Maintenance of Records for LEP Students The progress reports revealed that the LRSD apprised all staff of the importance of maintaining accurate records regarding the implementation of the ALP and documenting actions pertaining to students participating and exiting the ALP. A review of student records revealed that the LRSD maintains, at a minimum, the following documentation in student cumulative folders: Home Language Survey, LAS assessment data\ncommunications with parents in a language they can understand\nplacement decisions\nreport cards\nmodifications\ndecisions to exit student\nand decisions for students to reenter the ALP. Based on a review of the information, OCR has determined that the LRSD has fulfilled the terms under this provision of the CTR andcomplied with the OCR reporting requirements. After analyzing the above information provided by the LRSD, OCR has determined that the LRSD has met all oft..'ic commitn1ents as specified in the CTR. Therefore, OCR is closing this compliance review contingent upon the LRSD's continued implementation of the terms delineated in the September 30, 1999. While no further progress reports are required, OCR understands that the LRSD will continue to conduct qualitative and quantitative program evaluations in accordance with its civil rights responsibilities. OCR is available to provide technical assistance to the LRSD and will work with you and LRSD staff to ensure continued compliance with the regulatory requirements under Title VI, Section 504, and Title IL Under the Freedom of Information Act, it may be necessary to release this document and related correspondence and records upon request. In the event that OCR receives such a request, it will seek to protect, to the extent provided by law, personally identifiable information which, if released, could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. We appreciate your cooperation and that of your staff, especially the assistance provided by Ms. Karen Broadnax, ESL Supervisor. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. John F. Stephens at 214/880-2464 or Ms. Maria H. Gonzalez at 214/880-4918. Sincerely, n / tr_(1, r_ / Tayl~ugust, b~ Office for Civil Rights Southern Division, Dallas Office C: Ms. Karen E. Broadnax, ESL Supervisor .~., m :,0 ~z z ,m... (\") ~ C\u0026gt; m (/) DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR.KANSAS April 22, 2004 Board of Education ~everly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with AC.A 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. p g z ~ c5 z U\u0026gt; Personnel Changes Page 2 April 22, 2004 NAME Coleman, Lucy Reason: Leaving City Hill, Peggy Reason: None Given Jones, Gregory Reason: Accepted Another Position Moore, Kenneth Reason: Terminated Bledsoe, Fred Johnson, Marcus POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignationsrf erminations Certified Employees Speech Pathology 9-18-00 62-08 FOREST HGTS. 4-1-04 SPE925 Elem IV 8-1-02 1-04 STEPHENS 3-17-04 TCH925 ElemV 8-13-98 4-07 FOREST PARK 3-26-04 TCH925 Asst. Principal 7-22-96 66-15 HALL 4-8-04 ADC105 New Certified Employees Art 1-20-04 1-01 MCCLELLAN TCH925 Band 4-2-04 1-01 MANN TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 41088.00 29409.00 36683.00 57060.00 27309.00 annual 5831.61 prorated 27309.00 annual 5831.61 prorated f) C 0 z ~ cz5 u, ~ .., z )\u0026gt; z n ,\u0026gt;- u,\ns,,~ u, CU\u0026gt; 1:n 1:::C mg\n,o ,- ~u, elm G)\n,o ~~ 1:m u, u, .)\u0026gt; :\u0026lt;: G) C\" a, er ~~\n', o,%,- mer G) Cf Ccr ~~ or z: IT \" ?'\n,o 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ m ::E Personnel Changes Page 3 April 22, 2004 NAME Oshea, Christine Tell, Hatem Williams, Norma NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Tutor WAKEFIELD Business Ed. FAIR Alt. Skills FOREST HGTS. START DATE END DATE 3-25-04 2-23-04 9-29-94 Certified Promotion Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH950 6-16 ANNUAL SALARY 31431.00 annual 7694.05 prorated 27309.00 annual 9387.47 prorated 48998.00 TCH925 r\u0026gt; g z ?\ncz5 en !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z C') ,\u0026gt;.... en\ni,,~ en C en :i:n :i:::C mg\no,.... .,, en i3 !B C) \u0026lt; ~\u0026lt;'5 :i:m en en ,. ,t\n == C),... CJl ct ~. ~ ~ ~~ Cl Cl CCI E~ oz'\"r' rr \" Personnel Changes Page 4 April 22, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Akins, William Custodian 4-5-02 1-02 Reason: Personal MCDERMOTT 3-19-04 CUS928 Beard, Roberta Instr. Aide 1-20-04 1-10 Reason: Accepted Another FAIR.PARK 4-5-04 INA925 Position Booth, Jesse Security Officer 8-11-03 36-16 Reason: None Given FAIR 3-12-04 SOFR9 Brown, Robert Custodian 12-7-00 1-04 Reason: None Given STEPHENS 3-12-04 CUS12 Clegg, Earslean Care 4-1-02 1-08 Reason: None Given CARE 3-31-04 CARE Hawkins, Dawna Instr. Aide 8-31-99 1-07 Reason: Accepted Another OTTERCREEK 3-19-04 INA925 Position Hawkins, Derrick lnstr. Aide 1-26-04 1-10 Reason: one Given KING 3-11-04 INA925 Jackson, Brenda Child utrition 2-22-99 1-01 Reason: None Given CHILD NUTRITION 3-3-04 FSMEAL Jenkins, Clebum Custodian 3-24-03 54-05 Reason: None Given FACILITY SERV. 3-19-04 AD 12 ANNUAL SALARY 11046.00 14472.00 16802.00 15526.00 7.32 13492.00 14472.00 10527.00 29580.00 r, 8 z ?\ncz5 \"' !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z (\"') .\u0026gt;.... \"'\n,-\n \"'\n,, C: (\"') :l::c ~8 .\n.o, ..,..,..\ngo\nmo ~~\ni::m \"'\"' ,. \u0026lt;\n, f' 1%1 ct ~~  % ~~ Gl Cl C: Cl ~~ oz \"r' rT Cl !\"' ~ 0 .~., ~ I Personnel Changes Page 5 April 22, 2004 NAME Johnson, Tammy Reason: Accepted Another Position POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition WATSON START DATE END DATE 11-30-03 4-2-04 Moore, Pamela Care 3-10-98 Reason: Returning To School CARE 2-27-04 Reed, Audrey Reason: None Given Tidwell, Darrell Reason: None Given Bus Driver TRANS. 10-13-03 3-1-04 Child Nutrition 2-2-04 CHILD NUTRITION 2-18-04 SALARY CLASS 3-01 FSH550 1-05 CARE 3-02 BUSDRV 1-01 FSH4 New Non-Certified Emplovees Brown, Suzanne 4YROLD Aide 3-22-04 BALE Clark, Phyllis Child Nutrition 3-10-04 CHILD NUTRITION Davis, Calvin Custodian 3-8-04 CLOVERDALE MID. 1-10 INA925 3-01 FSH550 1-01 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 8364.00 6.88 10409.00 4314.00 14472.00 annual 3754.90 prorated 8364.00 annual 2330.95 prorated 5313.00 annual 1530.37 prorated r\u0026gt; 8 z ?\niz5 U\u0026gt; !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z C') ,\u0026gt;.... U\u0026gt;\nii,~ U\u0026gt; C: U\u0026gt; :1:n ,1:% mg\n,c,,.... .,, U\u0026gt;\n,om O\n,c, C) \u0026lt; ~(\"\n:1:m U\u0026gt; U\u0026gt; \u0026gt;\u0026lt; C\u0026gt; 1=' ID ct ~ ~ 2 ~~ C) Cl C: Cl ~~ o\" z'r IT \" !X'\n,c, 6 ,.~,., \"~' ~ Personnel Changes Page 6 April 22, 2004 NAME Dokes, Joann Ekeanyanwu, Jennifer Garcia, Maria Johnson,Ricky Kiefer, Eugene Lyons, Bernard McCoy-Robinson, Sandra POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition MCDERMOTT Instr. Aide DODD ESL CURR./LEARNING Security Officer HALL Custodian JEFFERSO Custodian TERRY Child utrition CE TRAL START DATE END DATE 3-10-04 3-8-04 3-22-04 3-30-04 3-17-04 3-2-04 2-23-04 SALARY CLASS 3-01 FSH550 1-10 INA925 1-07 INA12 36-11 SOFR9 1-02 CUS12 1-01 CUS12 3-01 FSH550 ANNUAL SALARY 8364.00 annual 2330.95 prorated 14472.00 annual 4146.03 prorated 17418.00 annual 5114.22 prorated 14473.00 annual 3260.40 prorated 14355.00 annual 4337.04 prorated 13784.00 annual 4809.74 prorated 8364.00 annual 2879.41 prorated ~ g z .\u0026gt;... ~ z u, !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n ,... u,\n,,,~ u, Cu,\ni:: n 31:::C ,m, ,g... .., u, ~lB G)\u0026lt; ~ \u0026lt;\"I 31:m u, u, \u0026gt;~\n, ?' a,ct r-\n~~ ~,,. gi (J ~~ oz\"\",r,'. (J ,!X,' 6 .~., \u0026gt;,, ~ m ::E Personnel Changes Page 7 April 22, 2004 NAME McNeary, Alma Mercado, Maria Scott, Frank Smith, Jimmy Watson, Stacie Young, Ilisa POSITION SCHOOL Nurses TERRY Instr. Aide BRADY Custodian DUNBAR Instr. Aide ALC Instr. Aide DODD Child utrition BALE START DATE END DATE 3-3-04 4-01-04 3-22-04 4-7-04 3-8-04 3-8-04 SALARY CLASS 1-07 NURSES 1-10 INA925 1-01 CUS925 1-10 INA925 1-02 INA925 3-01 FSH550 ANNUAL SALARY 16280.00 annual 4917.92 prorated 14472.00 annual 3129.08 prorated 5313.00 annual 1386.00 prorated 14472.00 annual 2816.27 prorated 11425.00 annual 3273.11 prorated 8364.00 annual 2422.36 prorated fl g z ?\ncz5 \"' !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z C') ,\u0026gt;- \"'\n,,,~ \"C': \"' ll: C') ll: :i:: mg\no ,- .,,\"' ::Om 8::o ~ri ll:m en\"'\n\u0026gt;\n,\"~' a, 0: ~-~~ ~If g~ ti s~ o\" %~ ti ?' 6 .~,, )\u0026gt;\nD ~ ~ Personnel Changes Page 8 April 22, 2004 NAME NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Non-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY !\"\u0026gt; g z ~ cz5 U\u0026gt; TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 SOUTH PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 April 22, 2004 Board of Directors FROM: Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: Summer Educational Programs Short Summary-The Board is asked to approve three categories of summer educational programs for our students. These three are summer enrichment opportunities for children (grades pre-K-12), credit recovery summer school, and the compilation and advertisement of a menu of educational opportunities for children in the Greater Little Rock area for summer 2004. Objectives-To provide greater opportunities for students to participate in educational programs during the summer that provide experiences that will:  increase students' academic knowledge, skills, and confidence.  build on prior student learning and give students a head start for the Fall 2004 school term,  provide enrichment opportunities (for all students) or credit recovery (secondary students). Expected Outcomes-Student will have access to a variety of challenging educational programs during the summer. Our school facilities will be utilized more effectively during the summer months for the benefit of students. Population-All Little Rock School District students have the potential to participate in a summer educational program. Budget Amount/Source of Budget-The budget projections for the programs are as follows:  The budget for Summer Enrichment Programs will be determined based on the number of quality proposals submitted to us at our request or in response to an RFP\nhowever, a ceiling of $150,000 is requested to fund approximately 12,000 student-days of summer enrichment.  The budget for the Credit Recovery Summer School for secondary students is $293,060 for approximately 760 students.  The cost of advertising a menu of summer programs in the city that might interest our . students and their families will be nominal. f\u0026gt; g z .\u0026gt;.. \u0026lt;5 z U\u0026gt; !.=,,' z \u0026gt;z (\") ~ U\u0026gt; Manager-Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Instruction and Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools Duration-The current proposal is for June, July, and August, 2004. Long Range/Continuation-Greater coordination and scale-up of summer programs and after school programs will occur in the near future. A staff position will be established or reassigned to provide direction to the identification, development, coordination and oversight of all after school and summer enrichment programs. Staff members have been participating in discussions with the City of Little Rock around the issue of afterschool initiatives. Mr. W. J. Monagle with the City has been spearheading this effort. Other Agencies Involved-Hopefully, the entire community will be involved. Certainly, many city agencies, institutions of higher education, museums, art and music centers, churches, and existing organizations for boys and girls will be involved in this effort. Expectations of Staff-A staff person will be assigned primary responsibility for this effort. Many staff members are already involved in portions of summer and after school programs\nhowever, the effort is fragmented. We plan to pull all the existing programs as well as new programs under one \"umbrella.\" Expanding educational opportunities for students is an ongoing commitment for our staff. Needed Staff-One new staff position, working in Pupil Services, has been requested for the 2004-05 budget year. Many other existing staff positions have a stake in this effort and will be involved. Teachers will be hired to teach credit recovery summer school courses based on the student enrollment. Comments-We cannot afford for our students to lose significant ground in the summer. Involving students in educational summertime activities can help improve students' achievement during the traditional school year. Recommendations-We recommend approval of the three initiatives for summer educational programs. Detailed budgets will be developed as more information becomes available. Three initiatives are proposed for summertime and/or after school implementation:  Summer Enrichment Programs  Credit Recovery Summer School for Secondary Students  Menu of summer educational opportunities for students and families Summer Enrichment Programs The district solicited proposals for summer enrichment opportunities for students from Philander Smith College and The Princeton Review. Also, the district issued an RFP for summer enrichment programs that is open to the public as well as to schools and teachers. r\u0026gt; C 0 z ~ ~z en ?\u0026lt; :c ~s\no= z~ C'\u0026gt;,\"' 0 ?\u0026lt; ~ \u0026gt;C'\u0026gt; c\n,o '-m g~ ~\"'~\"' m z... . RFP-Following is the \"teaser\" for the RFP for Summer Enrichment Programs. This was emailed to all schools for posting and was advertised in the newspaper. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP24-019 SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAMS The Little Rock School District (LRSD) is requesting proposals from qualified individuals/companies who wish to provide high quality summer instruction for students in our schools. The providers must be external educational entities\nhowever, this does not preclude schools and/or teachers from individually or collaboratively acting as informal external educational entities for this summer enrichment initiative. LRSD requires that these services be provided by individuals or groups that can demonstrate high-quality, performance based instruction founded on a research-based program of studies and successful instructional strategies supported by data. Summer Enrichment Program providers must complete an application based on this request for proposals. It is expected that proposed programs will include underserved students as a high priority and that instruction will concentrate on expanding, enriching, extending, and/or strengthening students' academic skills, knowledge, and confidence. Although the proposed programs are not limited to the areas of reading and math, reinforcement and application of reading and/or math skills should be incorporated into the programs in order to help students achieve Arkansas' standards, as demonstrated by improved performance on the Benchmark and end of course exams. Copies of the RFP and Application are available from Darral Paradis, at Darral.Paradis@lrsd.org or phone number (501) 447-2262. Proposals must be received no later than 2:00 p.m., Thursday, April 22, 2004 at the LRSD Procurement Office, 1800 East Sixth Street, Little Rock, AR 72202. The District reserves the right to reject any or all responses and waive any irregularities or formalities in proposals received. The District reserves the right to negotiate with the apparent acceptable Offerers. Awards will be based on those considerations that are in the best interest of the District and will be made to the responsive, responsible offerer whose proposal is judged to be the most effective and economical for the purpose intended, according to the requirements stated in the Request for Proposal. BY: Darral Paradis CPPB, C.P.M. I Director of Procurement The amount of funding for Summer Enrichment Programs will be contingent on the number of quality proposals\nhowever, an amount of $150,000 is requested as a ceiling. This amount could ~ C 0 z ~ cz5 u, ~ .., z \u0026gt;z n\ne u, fund up to 12,000 student days of summer enrichment experiences. A tuition charge will be considered to defray part of the cost. Credit Recovery Summer School for Secondary Students In compliance with Arkansas Statute 6-16-702, districts offering summer school for the purpose of remediating student failures must provide the program free of charge to enrolled students who are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. The majority of our students would be eligible for full tuition. For the 2003-04 school year, the LRSD had 5,243 students on the free lunch program and 753 on the reduced-price lunch program. Our legal advisers have examined the law and consulted with ADE, seeking clarity and any possible consideration for leniency. They found no relief for the district. A committee of administrators was formed to discuss the options for the district- to discontinue summer school or to have summer school. Issues in Favor of Continuing Summer School  Parents expect the district to provide some option for grade recovery. Historically, we have provided summer school for students who have failed courses, allowing them the opportunity to retake failed courses in order to advance to the next grade and/or to graduate.  The majority of students enrolled in summer school receive free or reduced-price lunch and would be denied another opportunity to recover skills.  Without summer school, there would be an increased number of students retained in the regular classrooms, adding to an already-crowded situation. Concern Cost to district for tuition-free summer school for identified students, estimated at $288,060 for staff salaries and $5,000 for transportation for middle school students (stops throughout the city). Detailed costs will be available later. Recommendation Because of the compelling need to continue to remove barriers for our low-performing students, we recommend that the district explore and allocate funds for summer school. f\u0026gt; 0 0 z ~ cz5 U\u0026gt; ~ .., z \u0026gt;z 0 \u0026gt;,.... U\u0026gt; Menu of Summer Progams in the City for Students and Families The following is a survey that is being used to compile a menu of surrimer educational programs around the city for summer 2004. The menu will be made widely available to parents and students SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM SURVEY The Little Rock School District (LRSD) recognizes the great value of children of school age having educational summertime activities. The district would like to assist parents and their children in finding appropriate enrichment activities during the summer. - If your organization is having a program for children this summer, please complete the survey. If you know of individuals or people who we might contact to get information about possible summer programs, please let us know who they are. LRSD will compile a list of summer programs and make that information available to parents and children. Thank you very much. Organization Summer Activity Times/Dates Age Children Served Contact/Phone I know ofperson(s)/organization who may be offering a summer program for school-age children. The name of someone to contact about this is: Name Phone Number e-mai I address My name and phone number are: My Name My Phone Number e-mail address RETURN THIS INFORMATION TO: Dr. Mona Briggs Little Rock School District Garland Building 3615 West 25th Street Little Rock, AR 72204 Phone: 447-2070 mona.bnggs@lrsd.org Many parents/guardians are interested in summer activities for their children. The compiled_ list will be available on the LRSD Website and also in a printed format available to hand or mail to interested parents. ~ 0 0 z ~ cz5 (I\u0026gt; !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z n ~ (I\u0026gt; Memorandum Date: April 22, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Education Through: _ ~~- Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools ~~:\u0026gt;~~~!~~}t Stewart, Chief Financial Officer ~73/Williarns, Director of Human Resources Prepared By:~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management Subject District Regulation GBEA-R. Reference AR statute 6-24-101:119 (Act 1599 of 2001). Board Policy GBEA and the corresponding Administrative Directive dated May 1, 2004 are attached for your reference. Summary: The statute above precludes a school District employee from contracting with the public educational entity employing him or her if the employee has knowledge that he or she is directly interested in the contract. The Administration believes it necessary to have a Regulation in place to summarize the statute and to guide the Board and Administration in possible exceptions. Manager(s): Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management Recommendation We request the Board of Education review and approve Regulation GBEA-R as attached. f\u0026gt; g z ?. cz5 (J) !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z (\") ~ (J) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBEA - R CONFLICT OF INTEREST - Employees selling to the District The LRSD contracts for goods and services in confonnance with statutory ethics laws and, in addition, in a manner that will avoid any conflict of interest or the appearance thereof. Accordingly, the Board will approve employees as District vendors under the statutory exception provisions only when it is clearly in the best interest of the District. General Prohibitions and Guidelines for Statutory Exceptions: In general, except as provided below, it is a breach of statutory ethical standards for an employee to contract with the District if the employee has knowledge that he or she is directly interested in the contract. The Board by exception may under unusual and limited circumstances approve an employee's business as a District vendor if the Board determines that the potential vendor relationship is in the best interest of the District. In such cases, the Board will document the approval by written resolution after fully disclosing the reasons justifying the potential vendor relationship in an open meeting in confonnance with AR law. Following are the guidelines for these exceptions: I. No exceptions will be allowed for District Administrators (defined as Director-level and above) who are directly or indirectly interested in a contract since these individuals are in District-wide decision making positions. In addition, any employee on a District Administrative salary schedule is prohibited from conducting business with family members. 2. District Administrator's family members who have a financial interest in a business as defined by AR law may contract with the District only after appearing before the Board of Directors explaining why their particular vendor circumstance should be considered unusual and limited. In the event the Board by resolution approves the business as a District vendor, the District may contract with the family member's company for transactions of any amount for a fiscal year provided the services/commodities are procured on a competitive basis and where the family member company's offer is the lowest received. However, the ADE must first have approved the District resolution before any contract will be valid or enforceable. 3. Under no circumstances will it be authorized for the District to do business with an employee when the employee regardless of their salary schedule placement or position has the ability to set the specifications for purchase and choose and/or recommend the vendor. 4. Non-Administrative employees (defined as any employee below Director-level) who are directly interested in a contract may conduct business with the District only after appearing before the Board of Directors explaining why their particular vendor circumstance should be considered unusual and limited. In the event the Board by resolution approves the employee as a District vendor, the District may contract with the employee's company: Adopted: a. for transactions totaling up to $5,000 for a fiscal year provided the services/commodities are procured on a competitive basis and where the employee company's offer is the lowest received or\nb. for transactions expected to exceed $5,000 for a fiscal year provided the services/commodities are procured on a competitive basis and where the employee company's offer is the lowest received. However, the ADE must first have approved the District resolution before any contract will be valid or enforceable or\nc. where competitive quoting/bidding is not practical regardless of dollar amount due to the nature of the service or commodity (sole source) provided the ADE has first approved the District resolution in those cases expected to exceed $5,000. Legal Reference: A.CA 6-24-101:119 Attachments: Conflict of Interest General Disclosure Statements for Board Members, Administrators, and Non-Administrators f\u0026gt; g z ?\ncz5 (/) .!,=.,' z \u0026gt;z (\") ~ (/) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: GBEA STAFF ETHICS/CONFLICT OF INTEREST Employees of the Board will not engage in any activity that conflicts, or raises a reasonable question of conflict, with their duties in the District. Staff Gifts and Solicitations No employee of the Little Rock School District will accept any gratuity or favor from any supplier, contractor, or person performing personal services for the Little Rock School District. Further, the same policy will apply to any person, partnership, company or any other entity which may be expected to perform such services, or offer bids or prices for any supplies, construction, or maintenance work to be performed for the District. Advertising of Products or Services by District Employees No employee of the Little Rock School District will use District facilities, school time, or the school or District name for any form of private advertising for products or services. ~Jepotism In order that there is no conflict of interest in the supervision and evaluation of employees, at no time may any administrator directly be responsible for the supervision and/or evaluation of any employee directly related to him or her. Adopted: November 18, 1999 Cross Reference: Board of Education Policy BCB f\u0026gt; 8 z ?\nc5 z en LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE: Effective: May 1, 2004 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE (AR Code 6-24-101:119) All District employees will be required to complete and have a current \"Conflict of Interest\" disclosure form (see attached: form for Administrators - any employee on an administrative salary schedule and Non-Administrators - any employee not on an administrative salary schedule) on file with the District's Human Resources Department. Forms are available from the Human Resources Department. New employees to the District will be required to complete the appropriate form and forward to Human Resources before beginning work with the District. The Human Resources Department will be responsible for coordinating its completion for all new employees. Existing employees who have not previously completed the form or who have had a change in disclosure status will be required to request a form and complete/return it to the Human Resources Department. The Procurement Department will maintain and publish an annual list of employees and their affiliated companies with whom the District may not conduct business resulting from an analysis/review of the submitted disclosure forms and in keeping with Arkansas Law. Disclosure (form attached) required by law from Board Members will be coordinated by the Superintendent's Office. f\u0026gt; g z ?\ni5 z U\u0026gt; CONFLICT OF INTEREST GENERAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FOR BOARD MEMBERS) All LRSD Board Members have an affirmative obligation under AR statute 6-24-101: 119 to disclose relationships they may have with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are performed. Disclosure must be made by completing the form below. The form must be completed and submitted to the Superintendent's Office. Ignoring this requirement or knowingly failing to comply with the provisions of this statute could result in the filing of criminal felony charges. GENERAL DISCLOSURE Board Member Name: ___________________________ _ Personal Mailing Address: City: ______________ State: __ _ Zip: ___ _ Phone: Please check either YES or NO below: I am declaring a Vendor Conflict of Interest Relationship _ YES or NO If you checked YES above, please complete the following: Company Name: Mailing Address: City: ______________ State: __ _ Zip: ___ _ Work Telephone: Complete below and check all that apply: __ I OR a family member own more than five (5) percent of the company above. __ I OR a family member hold a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management with the company above\nor __ I OR a family member am an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where my compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the  LRSD. Board Member Printed Name Board Member Signature Date Submitted .!=.,' z \u0026gt;z 0 ,\u0026gt;- \"' Dear Board Member: CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION LETTER Board Member Except as noted below (See Exceptions) a school District is prohibited from entering into a contract with a Board Member who has a direct OR indirect interest in the contract. Arkansas Law 6-24-101: I I 9 requires full open disclosure before a Board Member may sell, lease, provide services or enter into a .Q!l!@! with the District where he/she is a Board Member if the Board Member has knowledge that he or she is directlv OR indirectlv interested in the contract. \"Contract\" means any transaction or agreement for the purchase, lease, transfer, or use of real property or personal property and personal or professional services, including but not limited to, motor vehicles, equipment, commodities, materials, services, computers or other electronics, construction, capital improvements, deposits and investments. \"Directly Interested\" means receiving compensation or other benefits personally or to a business or other entity in which the individual has a financial interest. \"Indirectly Interested\" means receiving compensation or other benefits personally, for a family member, or for a business or other entity in which the individual or a familv member has a financial interest. \"Family Member\" means an individual's spouse\nchildren of the individual or spouse\na child's spouse\nparents of the individual or spouse\nbrothers and sisters of the individual\nanyone living or residing in the same residence with the individual or spouse\nor anyone acting or serving as an agent of the individual \"Financial Interest\" in a business or other entity means: (i) Ownership of more than a five percent (5%) interest\n(ii) Holding a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management\nor (iii) Being an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where the individual's compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the public educational entity. Financial interest does not include the ownership of stock or other equity holdings in any publicly held company. THEREFORE, all LRSD Board Members have an affirmative obligation under this statute to disclose relationships with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are performed. The form on the back allows for this disclosure. All Board Members are to complete this form and forward to the Superintendent's Office. Failure to fully disclose could result in criminal felony charges being brought against the Board Member. The entire AR Code including this law may be viewed at www.arkle!!.state.ar.us under research resources. EXCEPTJONS: I. A Board Member or his/her family member, after proper disclosure, may be allowed to conduct business with the District employing him/her if the transaction is approved at an open board meeting. Any Board Member direct]) or indirectly interested in the proposed contract shall leave the meeting until the voting on the issue is concluded. and the absent member shall not be counted as having voted. In some cases apprornl by the Director of the AR Depanment of Education may also be required . ., This statute does not appl) to most ordinar) employment contracts. including contracts of extra duties such as bus dri,er. club sponsorships. and officiating ball games. , 'either does it apply to reimbursements paid for proper work-related expenses. 0~ BACK CONFLICT OF INTEREST GENERAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FOR ADMINISTRATORS) All LRSD employees have an affirmative obligation under AR statute 6-24-101: 119 to disclose relationships they may have with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are performed. Disclosure must be made by completing the form below. The form must be completed and submitted to the Human Resources Department. Ignoring this requirement or knowingly failing to comply with the provisions of this statute could result in the filing of criminal felony charges. GENERAL DISCLOSURE Employee Name: Personal Mailing Address: City: _____________ State: Zip: ___ _ LRSD Location: _____________ LRSD Phone: ____ _ Please check either YES or NO below: I am declaring a Vendor Conflict of Interest Relationship _ YES or NO If you checked YES above, please complete the following: Company Name: Mailing Address: City: _____________ State: __ _ Zip: ___ _ Work Telephone: Complete below and check all that apply: __ I OR a family member own more than five (5) percent of the company above. __ I OR a family member hold a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management with the company above\nor __ I OR a family member am an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where my compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the LRSD. Employee Printed Tame Employee Signature Date Submitted r\u0026gt; g z ~ iz5 en ~..,, z )\u0026gt; z C') \u0026gt;,- en Dear Employee: EMPLOYEE CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION LETTER Administrator (Any Employee on an Administrative Salary Schedule) Except as noted below (See Exceptions) a school District is prohibited from entering into a contract with administrator employees who have a direct OR indirect interest in the contract. Arkansas Law 6-24-101: 119 requires full open disclosure before a school District administrator employee may sell, lease, provide services or enter into a~ with the school District where he/she is employed if the employee has knowledge that he or she is directlv OR indirectlv interested in the contract. \"Contract\" means any transaction or agreement for the purchase, lease, transfer, or use of real property or personal property and personal or professional services, including but not limited to, motor vehicles, equipment, commodities, materials, services, computers or other electronics, construction, capital improvements, deposits and investments. \"Directly Interested\" means receiving compensation or other benefits personally or to a business or other entity in which the individual has a financial interest. \"Indirectly Interested\" means receiving compensation or other benefits personally, for a family member, or for a business or other entity in which the individual or a farnilv member has a financial interest. \"Family Member\" means an individual's spouse\nchildren of the individual or spouse\na child's spouse\nparents of the individual or spouse\nbrothers and sisters of the individual\nanyone living or residing in the same residence with the individual or spouse\nor anyone acting or serving as an agent of the individual \"Financial Interest\" in a business or other entity means: (i) Ownership of more than a five percent (5%) interest\n(ii) Holding a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management\nor (iii) Being an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where the individual's compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the public educational entity. Financial interest does not include the ownership of stock or other equity holdings in any publicly held company. THEREFORE, all LRSD administrator employees have an affirmative obligation under this statute to disclose relationships with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are performed. The form on the back allows for this disclosure. All administrator employees are to complete this form and forward to the Human Resources Department. Failure to fully disclose could result in criminal felony charges being brought against the employee. The entire AR Code including this law may be viewed at www.arkleg.state.ar.us under research resources EXCEPTIO 'S: I. A District employee or his/her famil~ member. after proper disclosure. ma) be allowed to conduct business with the District employing him/her if the transaction is approved at an open board meeting. In some cases approval b~ the Director of the AR Department of Education may also be required. 2. This statute does not appl) to most ordinal') employment conrracts. including contracts of extra duties such as bus driver, club sponsorships. and officiating ball games. either does it apply to re1mburst111ents paid for proper \\\\Ork-related expenses. OJ\\ BACK ~ 8 z .\u0026gt;.. i5 z \"' .~., z \u0026gt;z (\") ,\u0026gt;- \"' CONFLICT OF INTEREST GENERAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FOR NON-ADMINISTRATOR EMPLOYEES) All LRSD employees have an affirmative obligation under AR statute 6-24-101: 119 to disclose relationships they may have with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are perfom1ed. Disclosure must be made by completing the form below. The form must be completed and submitted to the Human Resources Department. Ignoring this requirement or knowingly failing to comply with the provisions of this statute could result in the filing of criminal felony charges. GENERAL DISCLOSURE Employee Name: Personal Mailing Address: City: ______________ State: __ _ Zip: ___ _ LRSD Location: -------------- LRSD Phone: ------ Please check either YES or NO below: I am declaring a Vendor Conflict of Interest Relationship_ YES or NO If you checked YES above, please complete the following: Company ame: Mailing Address: City: ______________ State: __ _ Zip: ___ _ Work Telephone: Complete below and check all that apply: __ I own more than five (5) percent of the company above. __ I hold a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management with the company above\nor __ I am an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where my compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the LRSD. Employee Printed Name Employee Signature Date Submitted r\u0026gt; 8 z ~ cz5 Cl\u0026gt; Dear Employee: EMPLOYEE CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION LETTER Non-Administr-.i-tor (All employees NOT on an Administrative Pay Schdule) Except as noted below (See Exceptions) a school District is prohibited from entering into a contract with non-administrator employees who have a direct interest in the contract. Arkansas Law 6-24-101 : 119 requires full open disclosure before a school District nonadministrator employee may sell, lease, provide services or enter into a contract with the school District where he/she is employed if the employee has knowledge that he or she is directly interested in the contract. \"Contract\" means any transaction or agreement for the purchase, lease, transfer, or use of real property or personal property and personal or professional services, including but not limited to, motor vehicles, equipment, commodities, materials, services, computers or other electronics, construction , capital improvements, deposits and investments. \"Directly Interested\" means receiving compensation or other benefits personally or to a business or other entity in which the individual has a financial interest. \"Financial Interest\" in a business or other entity means: (i) Ownership of more than a five percent (5%) interest\n(ii) Holding a position as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or other top level management\nor (iii) Being an employee, agent, independent contractor, or other arrangement where the individual's compensation is based in whole or in part on transactions with the public educational entity. Financial interest does not include the ownership of stock or other equity holdings in any publicly held company. THEREFORE, all LRSD non-administrator employees have an affirmative obligation under this statute to disclose relationships with vendors before the District enters into a potential contract or before services are performed. The form on the back allows for this disclosure. All nonadministrator employees are to complete this form and forward to the Human Resources Department. Failure to fully disclose could result in criminal felony charges being brought against the employee. The entire AR Code including this law may be viewed at www.arkleg.state.ar.us under research resources. EXCEPTIONS: 1. A District employee, after proper disclosure, may be allowed to conduct business with the District employing him/her if the transaction is approved at an open board meeting . In some cases approval by the Director of the AR Department of Education may also be requ ired . 2. Thi s statute does not apply to most ordinary employment contracts, including contracts of extra duties such as bus driver, club sponsorships , and officiating ball games. Neither does it apply to reimbursements paid for proper work-related expenses. ON BACK '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" April 22, TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: Short Summary: Objectives: Expected Outcome: Population/Location: ittle Rock School District Board of Directors ~torofFacilityServices ~ ~  . Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial 0~ Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Request for Dedication of Right of Way: Parkview High School Request to dedicate to the City of Little Rock rightof- way on 26th Street near Parkview High School To fulfill the requirement of a Conditional Use Permit To go forward with construction at Parkview High School Budget Amount/Source of Budget: Parkview High School, Barrow Road and 26th St. area NIA Manager: Duration: Long Range/Continuation: Other Agencies Involved : Expectations of District: Needed Staff: Comments: F-.ecommendations: Director of Facility Services Permanent NIA City of Little Rock Fulfillment of the requirements of a conditional use permit. NIA See Below Approval by Board The Conditional Use Permit that allows the Little Rock School District to go forward with the planned construction at Parkview High School, requires that the District deed to the City of Little Rock the right of way on 26th Street, which borders the east side of our campus. This right-of-way dedication will not detract from the operation of the school and will eventually improve the streets in the neighborhood. It is recommended that the Administration be allowed to proceed with this right-of-wa) dedication. DE:cg 810 \\\\ '. i\\Iarkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-44\"\"-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 r\u0026gt; C 0 z ?\nc5 z Cl) !.=.,' z \u0026gt;z C\"\u0026gt; ~ Cl) DEDICATION DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That (Company or Partnership Name), an Arkansas (Type of Corporation or Partnership!, GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations to it in hand paid by the CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, GRANTEE, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby dedicate, grant and convey, without warranty whatsoever, unto the said GRANTEE, for the purposes of the installing, operating and maintaining public roadways, public utilities, storm drainage and for other public purposes, all its right, title , interest and estate in and to the following-described land shown on the \"Right-of-Way Dedication Exhibit\" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said GRANTEE, and unto its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has caused this Deed to be executed on this __ day of ________ , 2004. ST A TE OF ARKANSAS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PULASKI ) By: (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name \u0026amp; Title) (Name of Corporation or Partnership) Acknowledgment On this day personally appeared before the undersigned, a Notary Public within and for the County and State aforesaid, duly qualified, commissioned and acting, the within named (Authorized Signature), to me personally well known , who stated that he was the (Title) of (Name of Company or Partnership). an Arkansas (Type of Corporation or Partnership), and stated and acknowledged that he was duly authorized in that capacity to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and behalf of said (Name of Company) and further sated and acknowledged that he had so signed executed and delivered said foregoing instrument for the consideration and purposes therein mentioned and set forth . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this __ day of ______ , 2004. Notary Public My Commission Expires: (SE AL) H:\\Public\\RMB\\Fonns\\ROWdeed.doc f\u0026gt; 0 0 z ~ \u0026lt;z5 u, RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION EXHIBIT 3/16/04 BARROW ROAD 19 w---- 11 \"{__ N 53'26'55\" W I 5  : 52.31 ' I 20 : I I Right-of-Way Dedication Description Port of the SW SI'/, Section 11, T-1-N, R-13-W, City Of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point that is 50 foot west and 25 foot north of the NE corner of Lot 1, Sondon Addition as filed for record in plot book 4, page 295\nthence N 88\"26'31\" W along the existing right-of-way line of 26th Street, a distance of 593.22 feet\nthence N 53'26'55\" W along said existing right-of-way line, a distance of 52.31 feet\nthence S 88'23'31\" E, a distance of 636.13 feet\nthence S 01'40'03\" W, a distance of 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.423 Acres (18,440 sq. ft.) more or less. 200 - --+' ,JJ \\!\u0026gt; I w I W1 I: III ~~i=, ,,,,l I I I z J_ _JI ,I ~ --- -- i ~ LONGCOY STREET ~ 1\nz ----T-- ~I ~ Cl) 19 I I 20 - -~+-'.: \",\n,_., U) N lo co z I I ___ l_ __ ! I I I I I /w r\"\n_ l\"1 I~ ' \u0026lt;O I I Vl TATUM STRE~. I I --------=t-25 -~S 014003 W I 30.00' I II P.0.8. 100 0 100 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 ,, 1 oo 200 .!'.::,\u0026gt;, z,.. z C\"\u0026gt; ~ \"' ....... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: April 22, 2004 Board of Education FROM: ~al Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: School/Department Central High School Central High School Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Cloverdale Magnet Middle School $848.00 check for bus expenses for 9th grade students to attend the production of Romeo and Juliet The novel, \"Bleachers\" by John Grisham, to each member of the Tiger Football Team. The total value of donation is $1,603.49. Burger coupons, valued approximately $500.00, to be used as student incentives Donor Leslie Golden and Susan Nichols of Arkansas Repertory Theatre Kevin Crass of Friday, Eldredge and Clark Law Firm McDonald's RC Enterprise, Inc. A framed oil painting Mr. Carey Hilburn of Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, valued at approximately $350.00, to be hung in front office of school Board of Education April 22, 2004 Page 2 School/Department Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Seven (7) \"teaching computer tables\" and a portable AV computer station for the technology center of new library. The total value of donation is $1,400.00. Assorted office furniture and a Canon typewriter, valued at approximately $100.00, to be used where needed Two (2) Mark 100 AT Metal/Weapon Detection Systems with an extra control module, valued at approximately $7,500.00 Donor Fidelity Information Services, Inc. through Ms. Becky Bowling Mr. Mark Ross of Ross \u0026amp; Ross, PA Little Rock National Airport It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. ittCe 'Rock Centra{ J-{ifJfi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutli 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 'Pfione 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2003 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ SUBJECT: DONATION Leslie Golden and Susan Nichols of the Arkansas Repertory Theatre at 601 Main Street, P. 0. Box 110, Little Rock, AR 72203 very generously donated a check in the amount of $848.00 to Little Rock Central High School. The donation covered bus expenses for our 9th grade students to attend the production of Romeo \u0026amp; Juliet. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Littfe 'Roci Centra{ JffeFi Scfioo{ 1500 Soutli Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 'Pfione 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2003 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ ~~ SUBJECT: DONATION Kevin Crass of Friday, Eldredge, \u0026amp; Clark, 400 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2000, Little Rock, AR 72201, very generously donated the novel, \"Bleachers\" by John Grisham to each member of the Tiger Football Team. The total gift amount was $1,603.49. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted m accordance \\.vitl1 tl1e policies of the Little Rock School District . .. - . 0 \\,.  ._ t I ..... CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Angela Munns, Principal Date: March 22, 2004 RE: Donation Please accept the following donations to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School to be used as student incentives. Business McDonalds RCN Enterprise, Inc. 17200 Chenal Parkway, Ste 300 Little Rock, AR 72223 Donation/Approximate Value $500.00 (burger coupons) Also, please accept the donation of 1 Framed Oil Painting of Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, painted and donation by Mr. Carey Hilburn. The painting will be hung in the front office of the school. Mr. Carey Hilburn 1103 West Main Street Atkins, AR 72823 Donation/Approximate Value $350.00 Framed Oil Painting To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From~nn Blaylock, Principal Date: February 24, 2004 Re: Donation Please accept the donation of seven \"teaching computer tables\" and a portable AV computer station valued at a total of $1,400.00 from Fidelity Information Services, Inc. These tables were donated to our Media Center and our computer lab through Ms. Becky Bowling. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: April 1, 2004 TO: Board of Education FROM: ~arral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation Mr. Mark Ross, Ross \u0026amp; Ross, PA, P. 0. Box 538, LR, AR 72203 donated assorted office furniture and equipment to the Little Rock School District to be used where needed. Items donated include a computer table, round table, typewriter stand and a Canon S-68S typewriter. The donor estimates the total value of the donated items at approximately $100.00. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you . PROCUREMENT \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1800 East 6th Street  Little Rock, AR 72202  (501) 447-2260  Fax: (501) 447-2261 DATE: April 1, 2004 TO: Board of Education FROM: ~al Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donation The Little Rock National Airport donated two (2) Mark 100 AT Metal/Weapon Detection Systems with control modules, valued at approximately $3,000.00 each, and one (1) extra control module, valued at approximately $1,500.00, to the Little Rock School District. The total estimated value of this donation is $7,500.00. . Donor's mailing address is: Little Rock National Airport, Attn: Mr. Joseph Sargent, Electronics Manager, Adams Field, One Airport Drive, LR, AR 72202-4489. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank you . Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 DATE: April 22, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: 4'1ark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending March 31 , 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. - ----------  Population/Location N/ A  Budget Amount/Source N/ A  Manager Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services  Duration NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None ---------- --------  Expectations of District N/ A  Needed Staff N/ A  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the March 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 03/31/03 COLLECTED 2003/04 03/31/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 8,936,338 111.70% 10,100,000 10,644,676 105.39% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 29,600,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 205,072 109.66% 210,000 199,031 94.78% DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 135,184 75.10% REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 287,973 84.70% 380,000 254,808 67.05% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 150,103 54.58% 200,000 155,316 77.66% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 183,777 114.86% 240,000 189,155 78.81% TOTAL 97,432,000 67,422,790 69.20% 98,607,800 67,465,729 68.42% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 17,215 71 .73% 21,000 11,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 17,215 71.73% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 40,257,1 19 73.37% 53,226,139 39,125,356 73.51% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 5,241,465 69.06% 8,300,000 4,723,348 56.91% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 903,646 67.44% 1,400,000 993,438 70.96% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 757,851 44.58% 1,675,000 969,461 57.88% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 205,407 75.14% 273,358 202,301 74.01% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 2,453,084 66.57% 3,875,562 2,487,683 64.19% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 2,212,482 67.76% 3,900,000 2,312,167 59.29% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 583,296 57.98% 920,337 548,023 59.55% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 534,979 95.44% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 285,245 100.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 84,923 13.07% 360,000 236,541 65.71% TOTAL 75,441,106 53,643,152 71.11% 74,776,187 52,418,542 70.10% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 200,754 17.83% 1,350,000 180,868 13.40% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 554,813 33.33% 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% TOTAL 3,410,671 755,567 22.15% 3,752,430 725,012 19.32% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 121,838,724 69.11% 177,157,418 120,620,877 68.09% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,152,981 11,634,200 46.25% 24,075,790 15,366,005 63.82% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,082,476 52.32% 4,000,000 2,449,984 61.25% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 11,601,757 46.28% 24,689,351 11,600,006 46.98% TOTAL 54,198,923 25,318,433 46.71% 52,765,141 29,415,996 55.75% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 147,157,156 63.84% 229,922,559 150,036,873 65.26% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2002/03 03/31/03 EXPENDED 2003/04 03/31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,865,586 64,090,483 63.54% 100,684,982 63,436,899 63.01% BENEFITS 24,838,361 16,098,491 64.81% 26,483,772 16,510,443 62.34% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 13,340,573 67.39% 19,719,297 13,466,132 68.29% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 5,434,989 65.11% 8,185,459 6,610,040 80.75% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 927,565 57.36% 1,575,580 805,976 51.15% OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 2,932,072 34.46% 8,384,567 2,991 ,574 35.68% DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,213,572 99.97% 12,098,342 12,191 ,763 100.77% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176, 189,538 115,037,745 65.29% 177,131,999 116,012,827 65.50% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 11,442,759 43.76% 26,056,193 12,143,681 46.61% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,113,349 53.10% 4,000,000 2,771 ,767 69.29% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 14,296,955 57.04% 24,689,351 14,261,356 57.76% TOTAL 55,194,668 27,853,063 50.46% 54,745,544 29,176,804 53.30% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 142,890,808 61 .75% 231,877,543 145,189,631 62.61% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 4,266,347 (1 ,954,984) 4,847,240 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 (889,191) 1,578,177 3,797,771 OPERATING 8,675,891 15,358,630 9,052,274 13,634,905 TOTAL 9,325,586 14,469,439 10,630,451 17,432,676 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 03-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 33,282.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,501.92 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 76,602.53 43,199.84 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 1,551,750.15 12,158,026.39 5,255,441 .36 2,752,827.80 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 2,732.72 25,000.00 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 8,679.00 21 ,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 5,000,218.33 2,466,563.49 135,978.32 5, 166,256.33 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 158,459.00 14,368,511.04 7,659,055.84 9,437,398.71 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 934,239.80 224,051.20 1,176,728.24 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 6,797,427.48 30,015,354.97 13,299,526.72 18,612,142.73 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (3,335,868.48) 18,738,730.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 997,581 .12 (3,461,559.00) 4,824,799.01 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 998,581 .12 (6,797,427.48) 0.00 0.00 25,308,235.75 GRAND TOTAL  a~z Jg l!Z ~~a ~Ul l~ 12.lW Jg gJ:i J:i~ l!Z Ja\nm:i:.iH:.i ~ gag ag ~g PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL PROJECT ALLOCATIONS THRU 03-31-04 673,846.55 36,870,810.95 265,814.17 4,883,405.13 16,233,828.84 51,647,866.04 I 11,735,611.78 20,032,551.72 142,343,735.18 I I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED I THRU 03-31-04 1 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 THRU 03-31-04 1 SUBTOTAL (485,325.77) 1 I l I I 889,772.32 149,597.63 I 76,602.53 I o.oo I 630,646.71 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11 ,671,442.11 12,158,026.39 5,255,441 .36 I 34,117,983.15 I 113,930.47 109,609.73 I 2,732.72 25,000.00 251,272.92 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 I 8,679.00 0.00 I 4,862,214.57 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 I 3.455,350.67 I 2,466,563.49 1 135,978.32 11,067,572.51 397,615.34 I 4,119,045.21 I 15,666,239.90 14,368,511 .04 7,659,055.84 42,210,467.33 575,016.53 4,325,201.40 I 4.500.374.61 I 934,239.00 I 224,051.20 j 10,558,883.54 I 5,852,669.42 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 30,015,354.97\nI 13,299,526.72 I 103,699,040.73 I I I ENDING ALLOCATION 03-31-04 43,199.84 2,752,827.80 14,541 .25 21,190.56 5,166,256.33 9,437,398.71 1,176,728.24 20,032,551.72 38,644,694.45 Operating Operating Operating Food Service Activity Fund Fund Total Total Bond Account Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund ~apital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Total Deseg Plan Scholarship Total Rockefeller Scholarship Total Risk Management Loss Fund Purchase Date 03-31-04 ofo1-04 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND F_9R THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 Maturity Date TFN 04-01-04 Institution Interest Rate =-Type - __ Principal - - --- Bank of America 0.890% Repo - - Twin City ~an~ 1 -~~0% _ _ -CD 10,000,000.00 4,600,000.00 03-15-04 04-15-04 Twin City Ba~ 1.350% CD - - 7,500,000.00 22,100,000.00 03-16-04 TFN Bank of America 6.790% _ :._ RepO- 1,000:00o_ _oo . 03-16-04 03/08/04 01-16-04 01-16-04 01-30-04 11-18-03 05-15-03 - 01-16-04 05-15-03 12-01-03 03-15-04 - 03/29/04 12-05-03 01-15-04 03-16-04 _ J_,000,000.00 TFN Bank of America o.Tiio\n~ - 1,200,000.00 09-06-04 - Regions - --~ 1.050% CD - - 400,000.00 07-14-04 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934~1 07-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD - 5,231,3~~}f 01-31-05 _ Bancorp South ----1.850/o __ .=--co _ __b!QQ_,2j4.72 - 04-15-04 BankoftheOzarks - 1.300% CD - 6,000,000.00 08-16::04 USBANK 1.420% --CD - 11,000,000.00 06-10-04 sank of Ameri~~ o.910% -~Treasury Bills 5,365,126.36 05-14-04 Bank of the Ozarks - 1.360% CD 9,000,000.00 -_ 05-03-04~-=_1- Bank or the Ozarks 1:_?~%- _ --co- 3.060,648.33 0g: 15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD--- 10,293,800.80 TFN- Bank otAmerica ~30% -- Repo - 4,420,000.00 -\u0026gt;- --- - --- _ -- --- ---~.872,14~\"G3- 06-15-04 --- Bank of America --1-.0-20/~ _T-r-e-as_u_ry Bills _,_ _66_ 8~,_32_5_.2_8___, -___ 66~,325.28 06-10-04 1-- -- TFN Bank of America 0.250% 400,000.00 400,000.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1140","title":"Little Rock School District Compliance Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-03-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Compliance Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1140"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["72 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nIN' THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERIN\"E KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED MAR 1 : 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAIN'TIFF DEFENDANTS IN'TER VENO RS IN'TER VENO RS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE REPORT Plaintiff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Compliance Report states: 1. On September 13, 2002, the District Court issued its Order finding that the LRSD had substantially complied with all areas of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\"), with the exception of Revised Plan  2. 7.1. The Court's Order set forth a detailed Compliance Remedy as to Revised Plan 2.7.1. 2. On October 10, 2002, the LRSD 's Board of Directors (\"Board\") adopted a Compliance Plan designed to meet the requirements of the Court's Compliance Remedy. The LRSD filed the Compliance Plan with the Court on March 14, 2003, as Exhibit A to Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Program Evaluations Required By Paragraph C of the Court's Compliance Remedy. 3. Joshua initially raised concerns about the Board-approved Compliance Plan. The LRSD addressed these concerns in an October 25, 2002 letter to counsel for Joshua, attached hereto Page 1 of 6 as Exhibit A. Joshua invoked the \"Process for Raising Compliance Issues\" set for in Revised Plan  8.2, and the Joshua and the LRSD met with Ms. Ann Marshall to facilitate an agreement. The last meeting was February 28, 2003. At that meeting, the LRSD agreed to provide Joshua several documents. The last of these was mailed to Joshua on March 6, 2003. The parties never reached any agreement related to Joshua's concerns about the Board-approved Compliance Plan. Joshua waived any objections to the Board-approved Compliance Plan by failing to present them to the Court as required by Paragraph \"D\" of the Compliance Remedy. 4. The Board-approved Compliance Plan interpreted Paragraphs \"A\" and \"B\" of the Compliance Remedy as requiring the LRSD to: (1) continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003-04\n(2) develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\n(3) maintain written records of ( a) the criteria used to evaluate each program, (b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs, and (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process\nand ( 4) prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program. See Compliance Plan, p. 3. 5. Continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003- 04. Page 2 of 6 To meet this requirement, the LRSD implemented the 2002-03 Board-approved assessment --- -e .,tM it,~ \"? plan. ~W,\u0026lt;1 Pl/AM 6. Develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to 2. 7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. The Board adopted regulation IL-Rl when it approved the Compliance Plan. Regulation ILRl set forth the written procedures for evaluating the 2.7 programs. 7. Maintain written records of(a) the criteria used to evaluate each program\n(b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process. Regulation IL-Rl outlined the criteria to be used to evaluate each program. As to the results of annual student assessments, the LRSD continues to maintain a computer database with the results of annual students assessments administered pursuant to the Board-approved assessmen1. plan. Exhibit B attached hereto identified the members of each team. Exhibits C, D and E document informal modifications of the mathematics, elementary literacy and secondary literacy programs, respectively. 8. Prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to 2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program. The LRSD contracted with Dr. Steve Ross, an expert approved by Joshua, to prepare comprehensive evaluations of the District's elementary and secondary literacy programs. These evaluations, combined in a single report, were completed and approved by the Board in November of2003 and are attached hereto as Exhibit F. Dr. Don Wold, a program evaluator funded through Page 3 of 6 a National Science Foundation (\"NSF\") grant\nDennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\nand Vanessa Cleaver, Director of the NSF Grant, authored the comprehensive mathematics and science evaluation. The comprehensive mathematics and science evaluation was completed and approved by the Board in December 2003 and is attached hereto as Exhibit G. 9. The LRSD substantially complied with the Revised Plan and the Court's Compliance \u0026lt;f' Remedy by implementation of the Board-approved Compliance Plan. 10. By letter dated January 12, 2004, copies of the comprehensive evaluations were provided to counsel for the Joshua Intervenors, and counsel was asked to advise the District of any \"questions or concerns\" about these evaluations. In a fax dated March 8, 2004, counsel for the Joshua Intervenors wrote: I have reviewed your evaluations and find that they are grossly inadequate and incomplete. In addition to that I am still awaiting the evaluations of the other remaining programs which were contemplated by our agreement. Because we have already invoked the process required by the court, I am putting ODM on notice of our position. The LRSD denies that it agreed to prepare evaluations other than those described in the Board- ti' approved Compliance Plan. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits the program evaluations as required by paragraphs \"A\" and \"B\" of the Court's Compliance Remedy. The LRSD prays that the Court find that the LRSD has substantially complied with Revised Plan  2. 7.1, as specified in the Compliance Remedy\nthat the LRSD is unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations\nand that it be released from all further supervision and monitoring of its desegregation efforts. Respectfully Submitted, Page 4 of 6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376- Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on March 12, 2004: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Page 6 of 6 HElSCHEL H. fl.JOA Y (1'22-1\"4) WIWAM tL SlJTTON, P.A. BYI.OH M.. EISEMAN. JL, P.A. JOE D. BELL P.A. JAMES A. BUTT1.Y, P.A. fl.EDERJCX S. URSEllY, P.A OSCAl. E. DAVIS. JL. P.A. JAMES C. CLAll. JL, P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P.A. JOHN D!Wl!Y WATSON, P.A. PAUL 8 . BENHAM Ill, P.A. LAJ.J.Y 'W. BUllS, P.A. A. WYCll.lFP NISBET, Jl.., P.A. JAMES EDWAJ:D HAIJUS, P.A J. PtoWP MALCOM. P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON, P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON, P.A. J. SHEPHEU\u0026gt; lUSSE.LL Ill. P.A DONALD H. BACON, P.A. WIWAM THOMAS BAXTEIL P.A. 1.JCHAI.D D. TAYLOa.. P.A. JOSEPH B. KUUT. JI.., P.A. ELIZABETH ROBBEH MUllAY, P.A. CHR.ISTOPHER HELLEl. P.A. LAUR.A HENSLEY SMITH. P.A. ROBEI.T S. SHAFER. P.A. WIU.IAM M. GltJFFIN Ill. P.A. MICHAELS. MOOl.E. P.A. DIANE S. MACXEY, , .A. WAL TEI. M. EBEL Ill, P.A UVIN A. CRASS, P.A. WlLLIA.M A. WADDELL JL, P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTEl. P.A. I.OBEI.T 8. BEActl JL, P.A. J. UE Bl.OWN, P.A. JAMES C. BAK.ER.. JL. P.A. H.AllY A. LIGHT. P.A SCOTT H. TUCl.ER. P.A. GUY ALTON WADE. P.A. Pl.ICE C. GAkDNER. P.A. TONIA P. JONfS, P.A DAVID D. lr'IUON. P.A. JEFPJl.EY H. MOOR.I., P.A. DAVID M. Gll.A.F, P.A. ( By Hand Delivery ) Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm Plaza West Building 415 N. McKinley, Suite 465 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 FRIDAY ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK ATTORNEYS AT LAW A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP www.frldayfirm.com 2000 REGIONS CENTER  00 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201-3 93 TELEPHONE 501-376-2011 FAX 501-376-21  7 3425 NORTH FUTRALL DRIVE. SUITE 103 FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS 72703..4811 TELEPHONE 470.-HS..2011 FAX 479--ISV52147 2011 HORTH FIFTH STREET BLYTHEVILLE. ARKANSAS 72315 TELEPHONE 170.-782 211H FAX 170,-7822911 October 25, 2002 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Bank of America Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ( By Hand Delivery) Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 722Ql RE: Compliance Remedy Dear Counsel and Ms. Marshall: CAJ..LA GUNNELS SPAINHOUR. P.A. JOHN' C. FENDLEY. Jl.., P.A. JONANN ELIZABETH CONIGLIO. P.A. R. CHUSTOPKER LAWSON, P.A FR.AH C. HICKMAN. P.A BETIY J. DEMORY, P.A. LYNDA M. JOHNSON. P.A. JAMES W. SMJTtl P.A. CUfl'OllD W. PLUNKETT, P.A DANIELL. KEIJUNGTON, P.A MARVIN L CHILDEJ..s [.. COLEMAN' WESTBR.OOK.. JR.. ALLISON J. COkHWEU EUEN M. OWENS JASON 8 . HfMDR.EN BRUCE B TIDWELL MICH.A.EL E. r..A.JJaY KEU Y MUR..PKY MCQUEEN JOSEPH P. MCXA Y AU:XANDllA A. In.AH JAY T. TAYLOR M.UTIN A. LUTEN Mr. Steve Jones BRYAN W. DUX.E JOSEPH G NlCHOU ROBUT T. SMITH RY AN A. BOWMAN TIMOTifY C. UEU. T. MICHELU ATOk KAIEN S. HALBERT SAlAH M. COTTON PHJLIP 8. MONTGOMERY lklSTEN S l.JGGINS Al.AH G. BRY A\u0026gt;I LINDSEY MITCHAM SLOAN lHAYYAM M. !J\u0026gt;DJNGS JOtof F. PEISlllCH AMANDA CA.PPS lOSE Bl.ANDON J. HAU..ISOH o, C'OUNll.l B.S. a.All WJWAM L TEllY WlWAM L PATTON, JR. K. T. LAllUl.E. P.A. JOlffi C. EOfOU. P .A A.D MCAWSTEl JOHN C. FENDLEY, JR. LITTLE ROCK TEL so1 .. no-nn FAX 501 .. 24-lSJ.41 fendleyClec.net Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Dennis Hanson Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 In our letter dated October 11, 2002, we asked the parties to specifically identify in writing any perceived deficiency in the Board-approved Compliance Plan on or before Monday, October 21, 2002. No responses were received on or before that date. However, Mr. Pressman called on October 21, 2002, and advised that Joshua would rely on the comments contained in Mr. Walker's October 10, 2002, facsimile. On October 24, 2002, additional comments were received from Mr. Walker. All of Mr. Walker's comments will be addressed in turn. i.. EXHIBIT I A All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page2 October 10, 2002 Facsimile 1. More consideration is needed of the programs to be identified as \"implementat[ ed] pursuant to Section 2.7 ... \", which are to be subjected to \"comprehensive program evaluation ... \" Your document at page 7 identifies three areas. We note the absence of specific reference and detail regarding interventions/ \"scaffolding\" - areas of vital importance given the achievement patterns of African-American students. We note also that the LRSD compliance report cited many more programs as designed to fulfill Section 2.7. Mr. Pressman clarified this concern during our October 21, 2002 telephone conversation. Mr. Pressman explained that Joshua was concerned that interventions designed to assist low achieving students, for example SAIPs, were not being fully implemented and wanted some assurance that the comprehensive program evaluations would assess implementation of these programs. LRSD RESPONSE: On October 24, 2002, the Board approved the Division of Instruction's \"Plan to Support Low-Performing Schools,\" a copy of which is enclosed for your review. Under that plan, the LRSD will conduct curriculum, instruction and classroom management audits at low performing schools. Data gathered through these audits and other monitoring under the plan may be used by a program evaluation team to identify possible causes of poor performance, including poor implementation of interventions such as SAIPs. The LRSD lacks the resources to implement this plan at every school. Approximately 10 schools will receive the full compliment of services outlined in the plan. Those 10 schools will be identified based on the priority system set forth in the plan. 2. In a discussion prior to his testimony in the hearing [before] Judge Wilson, we understood Dr. Ross to indicate that the existing evaluation of the PreK-2 literacy program was not adequate. The notation on page 4 of your document of the changed use of the Observation Survey and the DRA relates to part of the concerns he expressed. This undermines the LRSD argument (page 11) that the existing evaluation, upon Board approval, will satisfy a part of the Court's remedy. LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this statement, Joshua objects to the LRSD considering the PreK-2 literacy evaluation to have been completed pursuant to Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. Attached are the comments received by the LRSD from Dr. Ross related to that evaluation. As can be seen, Dr. Ross did not advise the LRSD that the evaluation was \"inadequate.\" Moreover, it does not make sense for the LRSD to expend resources to have this evaluation \"completed\" by an outside expert while it also prepares a new, comprehensive evaluation of the same program with the assistance of an outside expert. All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page3 3. The LRSD discussion about satisfying the court's order regarding the evaluations mentioned at page 148 of the compliance report does not seem to talce account of the material provided, which describes an adequate evaluation. LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this statement, Joshua objects to the LRSD not completing the evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report in a manner consistent with IL-RI. As the LRSD understands Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy, the / District Court simply wants the LRSD to do what it said it did and complete the evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. That is what the LRSD intends to do. It is true that those evaluations, even after being completed, may not be model program evaluations as envisioned by IL-Rl. The LRSD decided, however, that the most prudent use of its limited resources would be to focus on the new, comprehensive evaluations of programs designed to improve African-American achievement. 4. We question the period of implementation of a remedy which the court has identified and, therefore, the LRSD schedule. LRSD RESPONSE: The LRSD is willing to agree that any agreement between the LRSD and Joshua related to implementation of the Compliance Remedy will not prejudice Joshua's appeal of the District Court's September 13, 2002, Memorandum Opinion. October 24, 2002 Facsimile 1. In using historical student assignment results, attention should be given to the quality of the data. In the past, LRSD has used results on the [D]RA and the Observation Survey in ways not consistent with the purposes of those instruments. In adpition, because teachers provided scores for their own students, the past use made of the data was in conflict with the district's recognition in the newly enacted Regulation IL-RI that \"Conflict of Interest\" must be avoided. LRSD RESPONSE: Paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy requires the LRSD to use all available data in its evaluations. It will be the responsibility of the evaluation team to weigh the reliability and validity of the available data. The Arkansas Department of Education and national organizations \\ with expertise in early literacy recommend the use of the DRA and Observation Surveys. The J primary purpose of those assessments is to determine whether students are learning the essential components of the reading curriculum. As to the integrity of the data from those assessments, the LRSD monitored student scores year-to-year to discourage teachers from inflating scores in an effort to show improvement. Moreover, the ultimate success of the LRSD's early literacy program will I - All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page4 be judged by performance on the State's Benchmark examinations, rather than the DRA and Observation Surveys. 2. We are concerned about the manner in which the regulation describes the \"team\" process for preparing evaluations, again in the context of\"conflict of interest.\" In order to insure that \"conflict of interest\" is avoided, the \"external consultant\" needs to write the report and control the -context of the analysis. Paragraphs 3, 5 and 6 of the \"Program Evaluation Procedures\" do not guarantee that the external expert will have these roles. Of course, if reports were prepared in the manner which we describe, there would be no bar to LRSD staff preparing comments to the Board with a differing interpretation of the evaluation results. LRSD RESPONSE: The LRSD rejects the implication that LRSD personnel cannot be trusted to write an honest program evaluation. The LRSD's commitment to improving student achievement is second to none. To fulfill that commitment, it is in the LRSD's best interest to effectively evaluate its Ero grams. The success of the programs and program evaluations will ulhmately be measured by the State's Benchmark evaluations. All evaluation team members will be actively involved in the evaluation process and are expected to provide a check against the self-interest of any one team member. The evaluation team will decide who writes the report based on the expertise of team members. The outside expert will be asked to take to the Superintendent any concerns about the evaluation not being addressed by the evaluation team. The outside expert will also be asked to be present when the evaluation is presented to the Board so that the Board can be advised of any concerns the outside expert may have about the final evaluation. 3. We continue to be concerned about the global, general manner in which the content of planned evaluations is described (page 7 of the document, first paragraph). For example, the Board has adopted a policy and two regulations dealing with remediation for students whose performance is below par. Studying the actual implementation of these standards (in all or a representative sample of schools) is of vital importance to the Intervenor class because class members are so much more likely than other students to exhibit unsatisfactory performance on the Benchmark and Stanford Achievement Tests. A satisfactory description by the School Board of the evaluations which it requires the staff to undertake should make clear that the actual implementation of remediation activities in district schools is to receive careful consideration. This is surely an important contextual factor (see \"Accuracy Standards,\" para. 2). LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this comment, it is a restatement of the first number paragraph in Mr. Walker's October 10, 2002 facsimile, and the LRSD hereby incorporates its response thereto. All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page 5 4. We understand from the Plan that the LRSD plans evaluations of programs deemed to be particularly directed to achievement of African-American students for the indefinite term, not simply for the period necessary to satisfy the court. We would like to receive the Board's assurance that this is the case. LRSD RESPONSE: The Board's approval ofIL-Rl was not limited to the term of the Compliance Remedy, and at this time, the Board anticipates continuing to evaluate programs pursuant to Policy IL after the term of the Compliance Remedy. Conclusion The LRSD hopes that it has been able to address all of Joshua's concerns. If any party has any questions about the LRSD's responses to Joshua's comments, we ask that those be submitted in writing, and the LRSD will promptly provide a written response. If Joshua continues to have concerns about the LRSD's Compliance Plan, Joshua should consider this the LRSD's written response to alleged noncompliance in accordance with Revised Plan 8. Pursuant to Revised Plan 8.2.4, Joshua has 15 days ofreceipt of this letter to submit the issue to ODM for facilitation of an agreement. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, cc: Dr. Ken James (via hand-delivery) PROGRAM EVALUATION TEAMS Elementarv Literacy Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy-Team Leader Pat Busbea, Literacy Specialist Judy Teeter, Literacy Specialist Judy Milam,\nLiteracy Specialist Melinda Crone, Literacy Specialist Ann Freeman, Literacy Specialist Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator Secondary Literacy Suzi Davis-Director of Secondary English, Team Leader Sarah Schutte, Middle School Literacy Specialist Dr. Karen Broadnax, Supervisor of ESL Eunice Smith, Supervisor, Special Education Dr. Mona Briggs, Safe Schools Grant Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator Mathematics and Science Vanessa Cleaver-Team Leader Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Marcelline Carr Beth Clifford Annita Paul Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Don Wold, NSF Program Evaluator Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator ..  EXHIBIT I B Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Elementary Mathematics 2001-02  An item analysis of 4th Grade Benchmark Data for 2000-01 reveals that students perform lowest on the geometry strand. (Note-The State Math Framework and NCTM National Standards for Mathematics contain 5 strands: number sense, geometry, probability and statistics, algebra, and measurement.) The analysis of data from the Benchmark Exam consisted of identifying the strand of each item, ranking the items from highest to lowest, and looking for trends in the data.  Program modifications made based on the low performance on geometry items was:  Train teachers to do item analyses for their own schools.  Work with teachers to discern reasons why students struggled with the specific geometry items (the released items were available for review).  Develop strategies for increasing the focus on geometry in the elementary mathematics curriculum.  School by school analysis of 4th Grade Benchmark Data for 2000-01 (and prior years) revealed different levels of achievement by schools that were demographically similar. Classroom observations in these schools by elementary\\ math/science lead teachers confirmed that the level of implementation of the . ) elementary mathematics curriculum was different from school to school. Schools with a higher level of implementation were having higher student achievement than schools who were not implementing the curriculum at that high level.  A program modification made based on uneven achievement at similar schools was to have principals identify a lead person in their schools to receive intensive and sustained training to serve as a \"coach\" for other teachers (See list of Math Support Personnel for LRSD).  Sara Hogg, UALR Mathematics Specialist, was utilizec'1 to provide monthly \"coaches\" training so that additional implementation support would be available at each school. A variety of types of training has been provided by Ms. Hogg, much of it directed at greater knowledge of strategies for implementing our elementary mathematics curriculum.  Another program modification made as a result of uneven achievement among schools was to begin a process of changing the way professional development for teachers is structured. In the past most professional development for elementary mathematics has been district-led (e.g., all third grade teachers go to a district-led training on the 3rd grade mathematics curriculum). The modification has been to shift more focus on site-based professional development. The \"Lesson Study' and \"Study Group\" approach was begun with elementary mathematics teachers to allow them more responsibility and accountability for their own training needs. ) 2002-03   The same item analysis was completed for 2001-02 4th grade Benchmark Data . Results of this analysis showed that students had gained in the area of geometry . The lowest strands were probability and statistics, measurement, and algebra. Staff and teachers reviewed the LRSD elementary mathematics curriculum to determine if there was a correlation between extend to strand coverage in the curriculum and student performance on those strands on the Benchmark Exam. The curriculum analysis revealed that there were some gaps in the curriculum that likely resulted in low performance on certain items on the exam.    Staff and teachers worked over the summer of 2003 use the Benchmark data to determine the \"big ideas\" or concepts students need to have a deep understanding about in grades K-5. Using several years worth of data, grade level teams of teachers in grades 1-4 (see list of teachers who worked on curriculum revision) ( revised the mathematics standards and benchmarks according to the five strands listed in NCTM Standards and the State Framework. Kindergarten and fifth grade will do similar work during the summer of 2004. Curriculum resources in grades 1-4 were aligned to those standards assessed most frequently on the exam. Supplemental curriculum resources were identified from several sources for use to broaden the scope of the curriculum at certain grade levels. Internet resources, Marilyn Burns and Associates materials, and other materials were identified and compiled into a notebook for use by teachers.  Benchmark results show that district students generally perform less well on the open-response test items compared to the multiple choice items.  Program modifications based on this data were:  Developed packets of open-response items for teachers to use with students.  Trained teachers to score open-response items using a rubric.  Developed and administered District-developed end-of-quarter or end-ofsemester exams that included open-response items.  4 th grade Literacy and Mathematics Benchmark Results over a period of three years caused some schools to be given \"School Improvement\" status by the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE). Schools in which the total population or one or more sub-populations (white, African-American, Hispanic, Limited English Proficient, Low Socioeconomic Status, and Special Education) did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress as defined by ADE were sanctioned with Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 School Improvement Status.  A thorough and detailed School Support Audit was done for schools in Year 2 or Year 3 School Improvement. (An attachment explains the school audit process). The schools that were audited were Fair Park, Baseline, Mabelvale Elementary, Wakefield, and Southwest Middle School).  A variety of program modifications were made in schools on School) Improvement as a result of the audit findings.  One major common finding from the audits was that effective questions strategies were not being routinely used in the audited schools. The modification made was to bring in an expert on questioning strategies (Dr. Lee Hannel-author of Highly Effective Questioning: Developing the Seven Steps of Critical Thinking) to 1 ead a workshop for all LRSD principals. 2003-04  All grade level teachers were trained in the use of these new curriculwn resources that were developed by the math staff and teachers during the August, 2003, preschool conference.  Item analyses of the 4th Grade Benchmark Exam showed that the statistics and probability strand was the lowest area for students.  A program modification made was to strengthen concept development in ( probability by added a replacement unit on probability from Marilyn Burns' s materials. Twenty-six primary teachers and coaches and twenty-five intermediate teachers and coaches participated in full-day training on the Marilyn Burns materials.  Three elementary schools on School Improvement Status collaborate to bring in Dr. Hannel to provide training for all teachers in the schools.  Dr. Hannel provided full day training for all elementary principals. (  21 of 24 principals responded that they were interested in having the questioning strategies training for all faculty in their schools.  Additional schools received School Support Audits-Chicot, Bale, Mitchell.  Program Modifications made by selected schools were to hire math coaches to assist with professional development and training related to implementation of the elementary mathematics curriculum. r Uneven achievement among schools was evident in the results of the 2002-03 4th Grade Benchmark Exam.  A Program Modification strategy used was to hire Dr. Linda Griffith to check the alignment of the mathematics curriculum, grades K-8, to the State Framework. The results ofthis alignment will include recommendations for improving the alignment in the curriculum. , Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Secondary Mathematics 2001-02  Item analyses of 6th , 8th , Algebra L and Geometry Benchmark Data for 2001-02  Continued District-wide end-of-quarter tests for Algebra I - Pre-Calculus  District-wide end-of-module tests for grades 6-8  TI-83 plus calculator training provided for all secondary math teachers  Full implementation of high quality standards-based instruction/materials in math for all students in grades K-12  District leveraged support of professional development for all math teachers by providing funds to pay substitute teachers and stipends for teachers receiYing trninill-g.s -  Lead teachers continued to provide technical assistance inside and outside the classroom by conducting professional development workshops and classroom observations\n Continued partnership with University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR) to develop and offer graduate courses based on the needs of the District. The r.l 1 ~ following course was developed and offered during the 2001-02 SY: \\l.Y o Strategies for Teaching Geometry  Developed and distributed pacing guides for secondary mathematics and courses to address the issue of student mobility within the District  High school mathematics courses (Algebra I - Precalculus) were revised to reflect a closer alignment with the national and state standards and frameworks\n The SMART (Summer Mathematics Advanced Readiness Training) program is an academic student support program for students who will be enrolled in Algebra I the upcoming fall semester. Project THRIVE, the follow-up component of SMART, is a Saturday academy for students currently enrolled in Algebra I. sV These programs are aligned with the State Goals for Algebra I. Algebra I EOC (.,.,IJJVK.l--t results of students who participate in these programs are compared with the overall District results o SMART /Project THRIVE served more than 200 students in Algebra  The agendas for horizontal team meetings (each grade/subject level 6th gradeCalculus) are developed around the results of the benchmark exams. Teachers concentrate on areas of wealmess for students and work on modifications in instructional strategies to improve those areas. In addition, trends and patterns are studied to measure the impact of instructional practices in the classroom.  Implemented instruction in Algebra I through Riverdeep software in all high schools 7 2002-03  Changed format of pre-school conference meeting to involve more teachers doing presentations on standards-based activities\n Purchased Texas Instruments APPs Suite for Algebra I for all middle and high J schools\n Provided training from College Board Pacesetter for Algebra I - Pre-calculus teachers - over 80% of secondary math teachers were trained  Continued District-wide end-of-.s!1arteLtest..for 6th grade - Calculus\n Continued to provide prof'essTo\"nal development for all secondary math teachers on topics including: o Riverdeep Interactive Software o TI-83 plus calculators o UALR Graduate Courses  Strategies for Teaching Algebra  Integrating the Graphing Calculator  Revised and enacted procedures for ensuring that students who are Limited English Proficient (LEP) achieve the curriculum content standards and benchmarks established by the State of Arkansas and LRSD\n Continued to implement high-quality standards-based instruction for grades 6-12 mathematics\n Continued to hold monthly vertical team meetings for secondary math teachers/ vlt,\n..,  Held horizontal team meetings (one per semester) for each secondary math course\n2003-04  Classroom sets of graphing calculators provided for all Algebra I - Calculus teachers\n Offered UALR graduate course on Using Handheld Technology to Enhance the t1n-vti,,...-/ Mathematics Classroom - used the TI-Navigator system\n Continued vertical and horizontal team meetings including 6th -8th  Workshop by Dr. Linda Griffith for calculus teachers on integrating calculator to teach calculus\n Continued end-of-quarter tests\n 6 th -8 th grade curriculum revised to reflect a closer alignment with the national and state standards and frameworks\nMarcelline Carr and Vanessa Cleaver FY 2002-03 Actions of the LRSD Elementary Literacy Department related to Literacy Program Evaluation The LRSD Elementary Literacy Department continued to provide professional development (ELLA, EFFECTIVE LITERACY, Reading Recovery) to all LRSD schools to support implementation of the LRSD Pre-K-3 Literacy Plan. The Elementary Literacy Department examined the Spring 2002 CRT Literacy data to identify the schools most in need of assistance in the area ofliteracy with particular attention to the academic achievement of African American students and their needs. The data indicated that the writing rogram was the weak comRone_!_lt oft~ literacy instructional prQg[am. The Elementary Literacy Department provided staff development related to writing instruction, and the writing programs in schools were modified to include \"best practices.\" The Spring 2003 CRT Literacy data from several schools reflected the schools' efforts to improve their students' academic achievement in writing. The District used the assessment data to also provide the low performing schools with the opportunity to participate in the LRSD Reading First Project. The project, which is federally funded, provides significant funding to schools to implement research-based instructional strategies. -T-w-el-ve schools chose to participate in the pniiect to begin.in the fall of 2003 . The project requires the sc oo s to o ow an assessment schedule related to program improvement. Because of lack of movement in student achievement in literacy, three schools on school improvement decided to move from the Success for All program to the research-based instruction recommended in Reading First. FY 2003-04 August - December 2003 Response to the Literacy Program Evaluation The Elementary Literacy Department reviewed the literacy program evaluation report developed by Dr. Ross and developed a plan to continue program evaluation in the future which included the following:  Continue the use of focus groups for each of the professional development programs (ELLA, Effective Literacy, Reading Recovery, Literacy Coaches, Success for All) and develop a table of the most and least effective elements. The information from the focus groups will then be used to modify the District's professional development plan.  ( Compare student data from the CRT and District assessments in each school to compare the academic achievement of African-American students with others as related to the instructional program and provide specific professional development based on the identified needs of the students. ...  EXHIBIT ID The staff also reviewed the section of the report related to the most effective and least effective elements of each staff development offered by the District. The following actions were taken to address the weaknesses of the professional development:  Provided additional guided reading materials to all schools to support small group instruction to ensure equitable instruction for all students.  Provided a diverse collection of books to low performing schools to ensure that a variety of texts is available for independent reading.  Modified the testing schedule ( except in Reading Excellence and Reading First schools) to accommodate the need for a more streamlined assessment plan. Literacy Achievement Data Review Dr. Ed Williams met with the Elementary Literacy Department regarding the 2003 Primary Literacy Benchmark Exam with attention to the academic achievement of African American students as compared to other students. Schools most in need were identified and assigned to specific Literacy Specialists who had the task of reviewing the testing data more closely with the assigned schools. The Elementary Literacy Department employed the services of a consultant to discuss with the Literacy Specialists the most effective approach to use with the schools in examinin their data and using it to make ro am modifications or changes. After the consultant's visit, the staff developed a p an or working with the schools. Assistance provided to the schools was varied based on the needs of the school but included inservice on the Primary Benchmark Exam and data analysis. In some schools, the principal and staff had already examined the data and outside assistance was not requested. Results of the data review confirmed that the professional development provided by the Elementary Literacy Department should include heavy emphasis on content ar~a reading.a.nd...writing. In addition to the professional de~being o ere on an ongoing basis to teachers grades 2-4, the Elementary Literacy Department and the Social Studies Department began working collaboratively to provide the training, resources, and materials for 5th grade teachers to integrate reading and social studies instruction. Three training sessions were held in January 2004 to model for teachers how to integrate the two areas. LRSD Reading First Project Schools The Reading First Project Schools have been visited several times during the year (2003-04) by the LSRD Reading First Coordinator, District Literacy Specialists, and the ADE Reading First Technical Assistant. The purpose of the visits is to provide assistance and to monitor the instructional program of the schools. Monitoring was done using a structured observation protocol and assistance was provided to schools in various ways such as the following:  Classroom demonstrations  Classroom observations with post observation conference  Colleague visits to exemplary classrooms  Sessions for problem-solving various aspects of the instructional program L 3 The Reading First Literacy Coaches and classroom teachers administered assessments in addition to those required by the district. In the fall of 2003 kindergarten students were given tl:Je DIBELS letter identification\nfirst grade students were given the letter identification and phoneme segmentation tests\nand the second and third grade students were given the oral reading fluency test. The coaches and classroom teachers used this information to determine students in need of intervention, .and intervention plans were developed for each school. Progress monitoring was conducted on those students considered at risk or some risk in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and to make needed changes. In January 2004 kindergarten students were given the DIBELS letter identification and phoneme segmentation\nfirst grade students were given the DIBELS phoneme segmentation and oral reading~ -, fluency test\nand second and third grade students were given the DIBELS oral reading fluency test. IV\"/ The Developmental Spelling test was also administered to K-3 students in January 2004. / The Literacy Coaches entered all of the LSRD Reading First schools' data and intervention plans into the Arkansas Reading First Data Bank. Pat Busbea and Renee Dawson, Reading First Technical Assistants monitored the data input and the development and implementation of the intervention plans. Because the Reading First Schools are predominantly African American, particular attention is being given to how the students are responding to the intervention and technical assistance is provided to schools when the data indicates it is needed. Professional Development Specialized Training Based on examination of CRT, DRA and Observation Survey data, as well as teacher observation, it was determined that support and services were needed in the following areas of literacy in the lowperforming schools: phonemic awareness/phonics, spelling, oral language, and reading comprehension. Both local and nationally recognized experts in these areas of literacy were contracted to provide l/,W-,e,1.w -\"\"\" professional development to teachers of PreK through Grade 5. ~ Ongoing Professional Development Ongoing professional development in literacy instruction is made available to all PreK - Grade 5 teachers. This professional development, a component of the State Smart Start Initiative, includes: Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) for grades K-2 Effective Literacy for grades 2-4 The LRSD Effective Literacy 5 for grade 5 Pre Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (PreELLA) Pre-Kindergarten. Benchmark Preparation In response to requests from principals of the identified schools, District literacy specialists provided State Benchmark Exam preparation training to the teachers of grades 3-5 focused on the areas of \"Writing On Demand\" and \"Constructed Response\". I 11 Technical Assistance Technical Assistance in Literacy was provided to classroom teachers at the Elementary Schools identified for School Improvement. The focus and the intensity of the assistance were based on the particular needs of each teacher related to instruction during the 2  hour Literacy Block - Reading Workshop, Writing Workshop and Word Study. Reading Specialists visited each classroom in need of assistance to meet with the teacher. The specialist and teacher identified the specific needs from the following areas: Physical Setting/Context for Instruction Explicit Phonics/Spelling/Word Study Literature Circles/Literature Discussion Groups Guided Reading Instruction Shared Reading Shared Writing Strategy-Based Mini Lessons Literacy Corners Teacher Read Aloud Writing Workshop Reading Workshop Independent Reading Benchmark Prep The specialists then addressed the areas identified, including: setting up Literacy Corners, rearranging classrooms, organizing and categorizing reading materials, teaching students in both whole and small group, modeling instructional approaches, demonstrating the use of materials, assessing students and developing instructional plans. Professional books, independent reading books and sets of books for guided reading, as well as organizational materials and center supplies are also provided. 4 C ao.c 1--y:,s Approximately 20 of the schools have employed literacy coaches to help support and accelerate change in literacy instruction to improve the achievement of all students in the area ofliteracy. !y 2001-2002 Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Secondary Literacy 1. Teachers attended after school meetings with director to examine data and conduct analysis of scores of ACTAAP tests. 2. English faculty of each school spent a day together with English director and building principal in session devoted to best practices for improvement ofliteracy program. January - March 2002. 3. All building assistant principals at middle school were inserviced by director in literacy program in order to provide for more consistent supervision and coordination by including all administrators in literacy program. 4. Monthly collaboration sessions were held at all middle schools, taking turns hosting, with dedicated topics related to modifying literacy program and practices. 5. Recognizing that secondary teachers have never been trained in the teaching of reading, Dee Bench, consultant from Denver Coalition of Business and Education was employed to lead staff development during summer of '02 for teachers to modify reading strategies and instruction. Four weeks of training took place with achers (approximate! 75 all four core subjects in attendance. This summer inservice was a modification to include all cross curricular teachers in literacy program. 2002-2003 I. Teachers met with director to assist in production of curriculum for writing in order to be able to consistently deliver quality program elements. Evaluation of current practice and -focus on op.timuro results _were goals. Spring - Summer '02. New Writing Curriculum was put into use 02-03. Teachers were inserviced school by school during preschool work days on use of new curriculum. Committee of teachers for curriculum development: Brenda Bankston, Mabelvale Middle School Barbara Brandon, Southwest Middle School Lisa Lewis, Pulaski Heights Middle School Sarah Schutte, Cloverdale Middle School Alison Hargis, Central High School Dr. Rhonda Fowler, Central High School Emily Lewis, Parkview High School Carol Carter, Hall High School Peggy Thompson, Fair High School Sandra Nichols, McClellan High School Karen Shofner, McClellan High School 2. Director met with building principals during early morning sessions to introduce new curriculum for purposes of effectively evaluating classroom mstruction and to provide basis for collaborative program evaluation. Fall '02. 3. Analysis of data from all tests and sessions with individual schools to modify areas of emphasis according to areas of need. It was discovered that our students do well on the ...  EXHIBIT l E. mechanics and usage areas..whi)e the writing in content areas i eaker. Strategies were developed to practice and teach these skills. 4. Practice kits were developed by the English office and distributed to every middle school teacher for use in modification ofliteracy program in terms oftest preparation. 5. Consultation with outside expert in reading comprehension for older readers to evaluate next steps and current status oflowest achieving students. Summer '02- '03. (Need for literacy coaches in high school was determined and, as a result, three are now in place at three lowest performing high schools , based on ACT AAP.) 6. Teachers met during summer 2003 to evaluate and modify urriculum producing an amending docwnent. Survey given to all English teachers prior to meeting and results discussed and useful for changes made. Committee to revise English Curriculwn: Wes Zeigler, Southwest Middle School Lisa Lewis, Pulaski Heights Middle School Billie Wallace, Parkview High School Beverly Maddox, Henderson Middle School Peggy Thompson, Fair High School Louisa Rook, Cloverdale Middle School Carol Carter, Hall High School Joan Bender, ALC Jennifer Moore, Forest Heights Middle School Alison Hargis, Central High School Cherry Robinson, McClellan High School 7. ESL Supervisor and director met to discuss and evaluate materials as they relate to program's effectiveness for ESL and low-level learners. Materials were purchased for these students as a result. Summer '03. 8. Consultant from Denver Coalition returned for one week of further training in reading instruction strategies for secondary students. 2003-2004 1. Based on being placed on School Improvement list, Associate Superintendent and director met to discuss literacy program at low performing middle school and to write plan for improvement following detailed audit. 2. Director has met with middle school principals and high school principals separately to discuss progress and evaluate future steps for increasing effectiveness of program and greater achievement oflower-achieving students .. September '03. 3. Personnel involved with audit of middle school met with building principal and vice principal to evaluate literacy program and discuss focus for improving student achievement through literacy program. 4. Bi-Monthly meetings to evaluate programs and problems and collaborate on strategies for improvement held with director and high school literacy coaches. Five meetings held, August - October '03. 5. Session was held for disaggregating data - school by school and teacher by teacher - for recent performances on SAT 9 and ACT AAP to evaluate successes and areas and students and teachers needing improvement for high schools. August - September '03. 6. Meeting with department chairs and director to disaggregate data for middle school to evaluate successes and denote areas needing improvement in program. Sept. '03. }  SREB consultant meeting with literacy coaches to evaluate effectiveness oftest ( _ preparation strategies and plan for improvements. Sept. '03. 8. In response to data, sessions have been held at most schools with some or all of faculty in open-ended responses. Teachers have made many modifications to classroom instru~ion based on the experiential sessions involving reading, writing, and scoring with a rubric. 9. Implem~tation ofreading intervention for lowest performing ninth and eighth graders at three high schools and two middle schools began. One middle school uses same intervention for sixth and seventh as well. 10. Information and evaluation session held February 04 for all building principals and key administrators on reading intervention with proposals for expansion of program in 04-05. 11. All middle schools have committed to a day long inservice for their English teachers to review workshop structure for literacy program. April - May 04. On-going f' 1. ~r and Middle School Specialist meet often to discuss and evaluate progress, problems, and to set trainings, meetings, and interventions to correct and further progress. Attention to both lowest achievers and highest achievers is focus of discussions. Calendars are aligned and coordinated at these meetings. 2. Director and Middle School Specialist meet after school visits to evaluate implementation of literacy program strategies and content and to determine plans for improvement, especially as it relates to lower-achieving students. Weekly, at least. 3. Director communicates often and as requested to address individual problems in buildings with principals and teachers. 4. Middle School Specialist works intensely with new teachers to improve implementation of curriculum and literacy program. 5. Continue to provide training in preparing teachers in ACT AAP open-ended responses. 6. Middle School Specialist working closely with social studies department in providing literacy best practice training to assist in reading in social studies content.\n7. Participation in faculty meetings by director and specialist to modify program implementation across curriculum. ~-.. 8. Increase efforts to provide literacy coaches in all secondary schools. 9. Create, distribute and compile data from a survey evaluating the effectiveness of the literacy coaches. (In May 04 set date for survey June 04) I 0. Develop an action plan for providing specific inservices for hi gh school English teachers Spring 2004. 11 . Department Chairs meet monthly to discuss hurdles, issues, celebrations, and to communicate openly about the literacy programs. These meetings are separate for middle school and high school. These meetings serve as a means of communicating curriculum items, special events, new developments, and reminders to all English teachers from the district office as well as collaboration. Secondary Literacy Evaluation Team January 16, 2004 Suzi Davis, Chair Program Modifications as a Result of Analysis of the CREP Report  Continue to provide training to whole faculties in ACT AAP open-ended responses and rubric scoring. January, February, March, 2004  continue cross-curricular unit development and training in workshops  Communicate with principals on the need for intense support for the literacy program. January, 2004 ~ . Increase efforts to provide literacy coaches for all secondary schools / Create, distribute and compile data from a survey evaluating the effectiveness of the literacy coaches. A date will be set in May for a June meeting to discuss the results of this survey.  All eight middle schools have committed to a day long inservice for their English teachers to review the Read/Write Workshop structure. During this inservice, plans will be made for collaborations among schools for next year. April, 2004 ( Develop an action plan for providing specific inservices for high school English teachers. Spring 2004 Jl/4 i ct -t IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED MAR 1 1: 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE REPORT Plaintiff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Compliance Report states: 1. On September 13, 2002, the District Court issued its Order finding that the LRSD had substantially complied with all areas of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\"), with the exception of Revised Plan  2.7 .1. The Court's Order set forth a detailed Compliance Remedy as to Revised Plan  2. 7 .1 . 2. On October 10, 2002, the LRSD's Board of Directors (\"Board\") adopted a Compliance Plan designed to meet the requirements of the Court's Compliance Remedy. The LRSD filed the Compliance Plan with the Court on March 14, 2003, as Exhibit A to Plaintiffs Notice of Filing Program Evaluations Required By Paragraph C of the Court's Compliance Remedy. 3. Joshua initially raised concerns about the Board-approved Compliance Plan. The LRSD addressed these concerns in an October 25, 2002 letter to counsel for Joshua, attached hereto Page 1 of 6 as Exhibit A. Joshua invoked the \"Process for Raising Compliance Issues\" set for in Revised Plan  8.2, and the Joshua and the LRSD met with Ms. Ann Marshall to facilitate an agreement. The last meeting was February 28, 2003. At that meeting, the LRSD agreed to provide Joshua several documents. The last of these was mailed to Joshua on March 6, 2003. The parties never reached any agreement related to Joshua's concerns about the Board-approved Compliance Plan. Joshua waived any objections to the Board-approved Compliance Plan by failing to present them to the Court as required by Paragraph \"D\" of the Compliance Remedy. 4. The Board-approved Compliance Plan interpreted Paragraphs \"A\" and \"B\" of the Compliance Remedy as requiring the LRSD to: (1) continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003-04\n(2) develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students\n(3) maintain written records of(a) the criteria used to evaluate each program, (b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs, and (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process\nand ( 4) prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to Revised Plan  2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program. See Compliance Plan, p. 3. 5. Continue to administer student assessments through the first semester of 2003- 04. Page 2 of 6 plan. To meet this requirement, the LRSD implemented the 2002-03 Board-approved assessment 6. Develop written procedures for evaluating the programs implemented pursuant to 2. 7 to determine their effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students. The Board adopted regulation IL-Rl when it approved the Compliance Plan. Regulation ILRl set forth the written procedures for evaluating the  2. 7 programs. 7. Maintain written records of (a) the criteria used to evaluate each program\n(b) the results of the annual student assessments, including whether an informal program evaluation resulted in program modifications or the elimination of any programs\nand (c) the names of the administrators who were involved with the evaluation of each program, as well as at least a grade level description of any teachers who were involved in the evaluation process. Regulation IL-Rl outlined the criteria to be used to evaluate each program. As to the results of annual student assessments, the LRSD continues to maintain a computer database with the results of annual students assessments administered pursuant to the Board-approved assessment plan. Exhibit B attached hereto identified the members of each team. Exhibits C, D and E document informal modifications of the mathematics, elementary literacy and secondary literacy programs, respectively. 8. Prepare a comprehensive program evaluation of each academic program implemented pursuant to 2.7 to determine its effectiveness in improving the academic achievement of African-American students and to decide whether to modify or replace the program. The LRSD contracted with Dr. Steve Ross, an expert approved by Joshua, to prepare comprehensive evaluations of the District's elementary and secondary literacy programs. These evaluations, combined in a single report, were completed and approved by the Board in November of2003 and are attached hereto as Exhibit F. Dr. Don Wold, a program evaluator funded through Page 3 of 6 a National Science Foundation (\"NSF\") grant\nDennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction\nand Vanessa Cleaver, Director of the NSF Grant, authored the comprehensive mathematics and science evaluation. The comprehensive mathematics and science evaluation was completed and approved by the Board in December 2003 and is attached hereto as Exhibit G. 9. The LRSD substantially complied with the Revised Plan and the Court's Compliance Remedy by implementation of the Board-approved Compliance Plan. 10. By letter dated January 12, 2004, copies of the comprehensive evaluations were provided to counsel for the Joshua Intervenors, and counsel was asked to advise the District of any \"questions or concerns\" about these evaluations. In a fax dated March 8, 2004, counsel for the Joshua Intervenors wrote: I have reviewed your evaluations and find that they are grossly inadequate and incomplete. In addition to that I am still awaiting the evaluations of the other remaining programs which were contemplated by our agreement. Because we have already invoked the process required by the court, I am putting ODM on notice of our position. The LRSD denies that it agreed to prepare evaluations other than those described in the Boardapproved Compliance Plan. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits the program evaluations as required by paragraphs \"A\" and \"B\" of the Court's Compliance Remedy. The LRSD prays that the Court find that the LRSD has substantially complied with Revised Plan  2. 7.1, as specified in the Compliance Remedy\nthat the LRSD is unitary with regard to all aspects of school operations\nand that it be released from all further supervision and monitoring of its desegregation efforts. Respectfully Submitted, Page 4 of 6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376- Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on March 12, 2004: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol A venue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street , Little Rock, AR 72201 Page 6 of 6 HEJlSCHEL H. FklDAY (1,22-1\"') WILLIAM H. SlTTTON. P.A. BYRON M. EISEMAN, JR.., P.A. JOE D. BELL P.A. JAMES A. BlTTTI.Y, P.A. PREDERJCX. S. UISEltY, P.A. OSCAI. E. DAVIS. Jk., P.A. JAMES C. CLARI.. JR.., P.A. THOMAS P. LEGOETT. P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON, P.A. PAUL 8 . BENHAM Ill, P.A. LADY W. BUU.S, P.A. A. WYCK.LIPF NISBET, JIL, P.A. JAMES EDWAJlD HAll.lS, P.A. J. PHIWP MALCOM, P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON, P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON, P.A. J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL Ill , P.A. DONALD H. BACON, P.A. WILL.JAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A. aJOLUD D. TAYLOI.. P.A. JOSEPH 8 . HUIST, JI. .. , P.A. ELIZABETH ROBBEN MUllAY, P.A. CHRJSTOPHER HELLEIL P.A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH. P.A. ROBERTS. SHAFER. P.A. WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN Ill. P.A. MICHAELS. MOOllE, P.A. DIANE S. MACXEY. P.A. WALTER M. EBEL Ill. P.A. UVIN A. CR.ASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WADDELL JL, P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER. P.A. I.OBERT B. BEACH. Jlt., P.A. J. LEE BROWN. P.A. JAMES C. BAKER. JR., P.A. H.ARJlY A. LIGHT. P.A. SCOTT H. TUCK.ER. P.A. GUY ALTON WADE. P.A. PRICE C. GAkDNER.. P.A. TONIA P. JONES. P.A. DAVID D. WILSON, P.A. JEFfR.EY H. MOORE. P.A. DAVID M. GR.AF, P.A. ( By Hand Delivery ) Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm Plaza West Building 415 N. McKinley, Suite 465 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 FRIDAY ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK ATTORNEYS AT LAW A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP www .frldayfirm.com 2000 REGIONS CENTER 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 501-376-2011 FAX 501-376-2147 3425 NORTH FUTRALL DRIVE, SUITE 103 FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72703\u0026lt;'811 TELEPHONE 479-GUS.2011 FAX \"79-GU52147 208 NORTH FIFTH STREET BLYTHEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72315 TELEPHONE 870.782 28U8 FAX 870-.782 2918 October 25, 2002 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Bank of America Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 ( By Hand Delivery) Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Compliance Remedy Dear Counsel and Ms. Marshall: CAJlL.A GUNNELS SPAINHOUR. P.A. JOHN C. FENDLEY, Jlt... P.A. JONANN ELIZABETH CONIGLIO, P.A. It.. CHRJSTOPHER LAWSON. P.A. FR.AN C. HICKMAN, P.A. BETTY J. DEMORY, P.A. LYNDA M. JOHNSON, P.A. JAMES W. SMITH. P.A. CLIFFORD W. PLUNKETT. P.A. DANIELL. HER.JUNGTON, P.A. MAI.VIN L CHILDERS K. COLEMAN WESTBROOl... JR. ALLISON J. CORNWELL ELLEN M. OWENS JASON 8 . HENDREN BRUCE 8 . TIDWELL MICKA.ELE. ~EY KELLY MURPHY MCQUEEN JOSEPH P. MCOY ALEXANDRA A. lf'll.AH JAY T. TAYLOR MAJlTIN A. ~TEN Mr. Steve Jones BRYAN W. DUE.E JOSEPH G. NICHOLS ROBEJ.T T. SMITH RY AN A. BOWMAN TIMOTIIY C. EZELL T. MICHELLE ATOR UJ..EN S. KALBERT SARAH M. COTTON PHlUP B. MONTGOMERY I.RJSTEN S. l.JGGJNS Al...A}r,I G. BIYAN LINDSEY MITCHAM SLOAN I.HA YY AM M. E.DDl'NGS JOKN f . PEISEJUCH AMANDA CAPPS ROSE BJ.ANDON J. HAR.JUSON orcowsv.. B.S. a.All WJWAM L TEllY WlWAM L PATTON, JR. H. T. LAIZELE..l.E. P.A. JOHN C. EOtOLS, P.A. A.D. MCAUJSTU. JOHN C. FENDLEY, JR. LITTLE ROCK TEL 501J70.U2J FAX S012'4SS41 fenclltyQfec.net Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Dennis Hanson Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 In our letter dated October 11, 2002, we asked the parties to specifically identify in writing any perceived deficiency in the Board-approved Compliance Plan on or before Monday, October 21, 2002. No responses were received on or before that date. However, Mr. Pressman called on October 21, 2002, and advised that Joshua would rely on the comments contained in Mr. Walker's October 10, 2002, facsimile. On October 24, 2002, additional comments were received from Mr. Walker. All of Mr. Walker's comments will be addressed in turn. EXHIBIT A ' All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page2 October 10, 2002 Facsimile 1. More consideration is needed of the programs to be identified as \"implementat[ ed] pursuant to Section 2.7 ... \", which are to be subjected to \"comprehensive program evaluation ... \" Your document at page 7 identifies three areas. We note the absence of specific reference and detail regarding interventions/ \"scaffolding\" - areas of vital importance given the achievement patterns of African-American students. We note also that the LRSD compliance report cited many more programs as designed to fulfill Section 2. 7. Mr. Pressman clarified this concern during our October 21, 2002 telephone conversation. Mr. Pressman explained that Joshua was concerned that interventions designed to assist low achieving students, for example SAIPs, were not being fully implemented and wanted some assurance that the comprehensive program evaluations would assess implementation of these programs. LRSD RESPONSE: On October 24, 2002, the Board approved the Division oflnstruction's \"Plan to Support Low-Performing Schools,\" a copy of which is enclosed for your review. Under that plan, the LRSD will conduct curriculum, instruction and classroom management audits at low performing schools. Data gathered through these audits and other monitoring under the plan may be used by a program evaluation team to identify possible causes of poor performance, including poor implementation of interventions such as SAIPs. The LRSD lacks the resources to implement this plan at every school. Approximately 10 schools will receive the full compliment of services outlined in the plan. Those 10 schools will be identified based on the priority system set forth in the plan. 2. In a discussion prior to his testimony in the hearing [before] Judge Wilson, we understood Dr. Ross to indicate that the existing evaluation of the PreK-2 literacy program was not adequate. The notation on page 4 of your document of the changed use of the Observation Survey and the DRA relates to part of the concerns he expressed. This undermines the LRSD argument (page 11) that the existing evaluation, upon Board approval, will satisfy a part of the Court's remedy. LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this statement, Joshua objects to the LRSD considering the PreK-2 literacy evaluation to have been completed pursuant to Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy. Attached are the comments received by the LRSD from Dr. Ross related to that evaluation. As can be seen, Dr. Ross did not advise the LRSD that the evaluation was \"inadequate.\" Moreover, it does not make sense for the LRSD to expend resources to have this evaluation \"completed\" by an outside expert while it also prepares a new, comprehensive evaluation of the same program with the assistance of an outside expert. All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page3 3. The LRSD discussion about satisfying the court's order regarding the evaluations mentioned at page 148 of the compliance report does not seem to take account of the material provided, which describes an adequate evaluation. LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this statement, Joshua objects to the LRSD not completing the evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report in a manner consistent with IL-Rl. As the LRSD understands Paragraph C of the Compliance Remedy, the District Court simply wants the LRSD to do what it said it did and complete the evaluations identified on page 148 of the Final Compliance Report. That is what the LRSD intends to do. It is true that those evaluations, even after being completed, may not be model program evaluations as envisioned by IL-Rl. The LRSD decided, however, that the most prudent use of its limited resources would be to focus on the new, comprehensive evaluations of programs designed to improve African-American achievement. 4. We question the period of implementation of a remedy which the court has identified and, therefore, the LRSD schedule. LRSD RESPONSE: The LRSD is willing to agree that any agreement between the LRSD and Joshua related to implementation of the Compliance Remedy will not prejudice Joshua's appeal of the District Court's September 13, 2002, Memorandum Opinion. October 24, 2002 Facsimile 1. In using historical student assignment results, attention should be given to the quality of the data. In the past, LRSD has used results on the [D]RA and the Observation Survey in ways not consistent with the purposes of those instruments. In addition, because teachers provided scores for their own students, the past use made of the data was in conflict with the district's recognition in the newly enacted Regulation IL-RI that \"Conflict of Interest\" must be avoided. LRSD RESPONSE: Paragraph A of the Compliance Remedy requires the LRSD to use all available data in its evaluations. It will be the responsibility of the evaluation team to weigh the reliability and validity of the available data. The Arkansas Department of Education and national organizations with expertise in early literacy recommend the use of the DRA and Observation Surveys. The primary purpose of those assessments is to determine whether students are learning the essential components of the reading curriculum. As to the integrity of the data from those assessments, the LRSD monitored student scores year-to-year to discourage teachers from inflating scores in an effort to show improvement. Moreover, the ultimate success of the LRSD's early literacy program will All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page4 be judged by performance on the State's Benchmark examinations, rather than the DRA and Observation SUIVeys. 2. We are concerned about the manner in which the regulation describes the \"team\" process for preparing evaluations, again in the context of\"conflict of interest.\" In order to insure that \"conflict of interest\" is avoided, the \"external consultant\" needs to write the report and control the -context of the analysis. Paragraphs 3, 5 and 6 of the ''Program Evaluation Procedures\" do not guarantee that the external expert will have these roles. Of course, if reports were prepared in the manner which we describe, there would be no bar to LRSD staff preparing comments to the Board with a differing interpretation of the evaluation results. LRSD RESPONSE: The LRSD rejects the implication that LRSD personnel cannot be trusted to write an honest program evaluation. The LRSD's commitment to improving student achievement is second to none. To fulfill that commitment, it is in the LRSD's best interest to effectively evaluate its programs. The success of the programs and program evaluations will ultimately be measured by the State's Benchmark evaluations. All evaluation team members will be actively involved in the evaluation process and are expected to provide a check against the self-interest of any one team member. The evaluation team will decide who writes the report based on the expertise of team members. The outside expert will be asked to take to the Superintendent any concerns about the evaluation not being addressed by the evaluation team. The outside expert will also be asked to be present when the evaluation is presented to the Board so that the Board can be advised of any concerns the outside expert may have about the final evaluation. 3. We continue to be concerned about the global, general manner in which the content of planned evaluations is described (page 7 of the document, first paragraph). For example, the Board has adopted a policy and two regulations dealing with remediation for students whose performance is below par. Studying the actual implementation of these standards (in all or a representative sample of schools) is of vital importance to the Intervenor class because class members are so much more likely than other students to exhibit unsatisfactory performance on the Benchmark and Stanford Achievement Tests. A satisfactory description by the School Board of the evaluations which it requires the staff to undertake should make clear that the actual implementation of remediation activities in district schools is to receive careful consideration. This is surely an important contextual factor (see \"Accuracy Standards,\" para. 2). LRSD RESPONSE: As the LRSD understands this comment, it is a restatement of the first number paragraph in Mr. Walker's October 10, 2002 facsimile, and the LRSD hereby incorporates its response thereto. All Counsel and Ms. Marshall October 25, 2002 Page 5 4. We understand from the Plan that the LRSD plans evaluations of programs deemed to be particularly directed to achievement of African-American students for the indefinite term, not simply for the period necessary to satisfy the court. We would like to receive the Board's assurance that this is the case. LRSD RESPONSE: The Board's approval ofIL-Rl was not limited to the term of the Compliance Remedy, and at this time, the Board anticipates continuing to evaluate programs pursuant to Policy IL after the term of the Compliance Remedy. Conclusion The LRSD hopes that it has been able to address all of Joshua's concerns. If any party has any questions about the LRSD's responses to Joshua's comments, we ask that those be submitted in writing, and the LRSD will promptly provide a written response. If Joshua continues to have concerns about the LRSD's Compliance Plan, Joshua should consider this the LRSD's written response to alleged noncompliance in accordance with Revised Plan 8. Pursuant to Revised Plan 8.2.4, Joshua has 15 days ofreceipt of this letter to submit the issue to ODM for facilitation of an agreement. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, cc: Dr. Ken James (via hand-delivery) PROGRAM EVALUATION TEAMS Elementary Literacy Krista Underwood, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy-Team Leader Pat Busbea, Literacy Specialist Judy Teeter, Literacy Specialist Judy Milam,, Literacy Specialist Melinda Crone, Literacy Specialist Ann Freeman, Literacy Specialist Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator Secondary Literacy Suzi Davis-Director of Secondary English, Team Leader Sarah Schutte, Middle School Literacy Specialist Dr. Karen Broadnax, Supervisor of ESL Eunice Smith, Supervisor, Special Education Dr. Mona Briggs, Safe Schools Grant Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator Mathematics and Science Vanessa Cleaver-Team Leader Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Marcelline Carr Beth Clifford Annita Paul Dr. Ed Williams, statistician Ken Savage (technician) Dr. Don Wold, NSF Program Evaluator Dr. Steve Ross, External Program Evaluator ..  EXHIBIT I B Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Elementary Mathematics 2001-02  An item analysis of 4th Grade Benchmark Data for 2000-01 reveals that students perform lowest on the geometry strand. (Note-The State Math Framework and NCTM National Standards for Mathematics contain 5 strands: number sense, geometry, probability and statistics, algebra, and measurement.) The analysis of data from the Benchmark Exam consisted of identifying the strand of each item, ranking the items from highest to lowest, and looking for trends in the data.  Program modifications made based on the low performance on geometry items was:  Train teachers to do item analyses for their own schools.  Work with teachers to discern reasons why students struggled with the specific geometry items (the released items were available for review).  Develop strategies for increasing the focus on geometry in the elementary mathematics curriculum.  School by school analysis of 4th Grade Benchmark Data for 2000-01 (and prior years) revealed different levels of achievement by schools that were demographically similar. Classroom observations in these schools by elementary math/science lead teachers confirmed that the level of implementation of the elementary mathematics curriculum was different from school to school. Schools with a higher level of implementation were having higher student achievement than schools who were not implementing the curriculum at that high level.  A program modification made based on uneven achievement at similar schools was to have principals identify a lead person in their schools to receive intensive and sustained training to serve as a \"coach\" for other teachers (See list of Math Support Personnel for LRSD).  Sara Hogg, UALR Mathematics Specialist, was utilized to provide monthly \"coaches\" training so that additional implementation support would be available at each school. A variety of types of training has been provided by Ms. Hogg, much of it directed at greater knowledge of strategies for implementing our elementary mathematics curriculum.  Another program modification made ac\na result of uneven achievement among schools was to begin a process of changing the way professional development for teachers is structured. In the past most professional development for elementary mathematics has been district-led (e.g., all third grade teachers go to a district-led training on the 3rd grade mathematics curriculum). The modification has been to shift more focus on site-based professional development. The \"Lesson Study\" and \"Study Group\" approach was begun with elementary mathematics teachers to allow them more responsibility and accountability for their own training needs. ~ EXHIBIT l~ 2002-03      The same item analysis was completed for 2001-02 4th grade Benchmark Data . Results ofthis analysis showed that students had gained in the area of geometry . The lowest strands were probability and statistics, measurement, and algebra. Staff and teachers reviewed the LRSD elementary mathematics curriculum to determine if there was a correlation between extend to strand coverage in the curriculum and student performance on those strands on the Benchmark Exam. The curriculum analysis revealed that there were some gaps in the curriculum that likely resulted in low performance on certain items on the exam. Staff and teachers worked over the summer of 2003 use the Benchmark data to determine the \"big ideas\" or concepts students need to have a deep understanding about in grades K-5. Using several years worth of data, grade level teams of teachers in grades 1-4 (see list of teachers who worked on curriculum revision) revised the mathematics standards and benchmarks according to the five strands listed in NCTM Standards and the State Framework. Kindergarten and fifth grade will do similar work during the summer of 2004. Curriculum resources in grades 1-4 were aligned to those standards assessed most frequently on the exam. Supplemental curriculum resources were identified from several sources for use to broaden the scope of the curriculum at certain grade levels. Internet resources, Marilyn Burns and Associates materials, and other materials were identified and compiled into a notebook for use by teachers.  Bench.mark results show that district students generally perform less well on the open-response test items compared to the multiple choice items.  Program modifications based on this data were:  Developed packets of open-response items for teachers to use with students.  Trained teachers to score open-response items using a rubric.  Developed and administered District-developed end-of-quarter or end-ofsemester exams that included open-response items.  4th grade Literacy and Mathematics Benchmark Results over a period of three years caused some schools to be given \"School Improvement\" status by the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE). Schools in which the total population or one or more sub-populations (white, African-American, Hispanic, Limited English Proficient, Low Socioeconomic Status, and Special Education) did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress as defined by ADE were sanctioned with Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3 School Improvement Status.  A thorough and detailed School Support Audit was done for schools in Year 2 or Year 3 School Improvement. (An attachment explains the school audit process). The schools that were audited were Fair Park, Baseline, Mabelvale Elementary, Wakefield, and Southwest Middle School).  A variety of program modifications were made in schools on School Improvement as a result of the audit findings.  One major common finding from the audits was that effective questions strategies were not being routinely used in the audited schools. The modification made was to bring in an expert on questioning strategies (Dr. Lee Hannel- author of Highly Effective Questioning: Developing the Seven Steps of Critical Thinking) to lead a workshop for all LRSD principals. 2003-04  All grade level teachers were trained in the use of these new curriculum resources that were developed by the math staff and teachers during the August, 2003, preschool conference.  Item analyses of the 4th Grade Benchmark Exam showed that the statistics and probability strand was the lowest area for students.  A program modification made was to strengthen concept development in probability by added a replacement unit on probability from Marilyn Burns's materials. Twenty-six primary teachers and coaches and twenty-five intermediate teachers and coaches participated in full-day training on the Marilyn Burns materials.  Three elementary schools on School Improvement Status collaborate to bring in Dr. Hannel to provide training for all teachers in the schools.  Dr. Hannel provided full day training for all elementary principals.  21 of 24 principals responded that they were interested in having the questioning strategies training for all faculty in their schools.  Additional schools received School Support Audits-Chicot, Bale, Mitchell.  Program Modifications made by selected schools were to hire math coaches to assist with professional development and training related to implementation of the elementary mathematics curriculum.  Uneven achievement among schools was evident in the results of the 2002-03 4th Grade Benchmark Exam.  A Program Modification strategy used was to hire Dr. Linda Griffith to check the alignment of the mathematics curriculum, grades K-8, to the State Framework. The results of this alignment will include recommendations for improving the alignment in the curriculum. Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Secondary Mathematics 2001-02  Item analyses of 61\\ 8th , Algebra I, and Geometry Benchmark Data for 2001-02  Continued District-wide end-of-quarter tests for Algebra I - Pre-Calculus  District-wide end-of-module tests for grades 6-8  TI-83 plus calculator training provided for all secondary math teachers  Full implementation of high quality standards-based instruction/materials in math for all students in grades K-12  District leveraged support of professional development for all math teachers by providing funds to pay substitute teachers and stipends for teachers receiving trainings  Lead teachers continued to provide technical assistance inside and outside the classroom by conducting professional development workshops and classroom observations\n Continued partnership with University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR) to develop and offer graduate courses based on the needs of the District. The following course was developed and offered during the 2001-02 SY: o Strategies for Teaching Geometry  Developed and distributed pacing guides for secondary mathematics and courses to address the issue of student mobility within the District  High school mathematics courses (Algebra I - Precalculus) were revised to reflect a closer alignment with the national and state standards and frameworks\n The SMART (Summer Mathematics Advanced Readiness Training) program is an academic student support program for students who will be enrolled in Algebra I the upcoming fall semester. Project THRIVE, the follow-up component of SMART, is a Saturday academy for students currently enrolled in Algebra I. These programs are aligned with the State Goals for Algebra I. Algebra I EOC results of students who participate in these programs are compared with the overall District results o SMART /Project THRIVE served more than 200 students in Algebra  The agendas for horizontal team meetings ( each grade/subject level 6th grade - Calculus) are developed around the results of the benchmark exams. Teachers concentrate on areas of weakness for students and work on modifications in instructional strategies to improve those areas. In addition, trends and patterns are studied to measure the impact of instructional practices in the classroom.  Implemented instruction in Algebra I through Riverdeep software in all high schools 2002-03  Changed format of pre-school conference meeting to involve more teachers doing presentations on standards-based activities\n Purchased Texas Instruments APPs Suite for Algebra I for all middle and high schools\n Provided training from College Board Pacesetter for Algebra I - Pre-calculus teachers - over 80% of secondary math teachers were trained  Continued District-wide end-of-quarter test for 6th grade - Calculus\n Continued to provide professional development for all secondary math teachers on topics including: o Riverdeep Interactive Software o TI-83 plus calculators o UALR Graduate Courses  Strategies for Teaching Algebra  Integrating the Graphing Calculator  Revised and enacted procedures for ensuring that students who are Limited English Proficient (LEP) achieve the curriculum content standards and benchmarks established by the State of Arkansas and LRSD\n Continued to implement high-quality standards-based instruction for grades 6-12 mathematics\n Continued to hold monthly vertical team meetings for secondary math teachers  Held horizontal team meetings ( one per semester) for each secondary math course\n2003-04  Classroom sets of graphing calculators provided for all Algebra I - Calculus teachers\n Offered UALR graduate course on Using Handheld Technology to Enhance the Mathematics Classroom - used the TI-Navigator system\n Continued vertical and horizontal team meetings including 6th -8th  Workshop by Dr. Linda Griffith for calculus teachers on integrating calculator to teach calculus\n Continued end-of-quarter tests\n 6th -8th grade curriculum revised to reflect a closer alignment with the national and state standards and frameworks\nMarcelline Carr and Vanessa Cleaver FY 2002-03 Actions of the LRSD Elementary Literacy Department related to Literacy Program Evaluation The LRSD Elementary Literacy Department continued to provide professional development (ELLA, EFFECTIVE LITERACY, Reading Recovery) to all LRSD schools to support implementation of the LRSD Pre-K-3 Literacy Plan. The Elementary Literacy Department examined the Spring 2002 CRT Literacy data to identify the schools most in need of assistance in the area ofliteracy with particular attention to the academic achievement of African American students and their needs. The data indicated that the writing program was the weak component of the literacy instructional program. The Elementary Literacy Department provided staff development related to writing instruction, and the writing programs in schools were modified to include \"best practices.\" The Spring 2003 CRT Literacy data from several schools reflected the schools' efforts to improve their students' academic achievement in writing. The District used the assessment data to also provide the low performing schools with the opportunity to participate in the LRSD Reading First Project. The project, which is federally funded, provides significant funding to schools to implement research-based instructional strategies. Twelve schools chose to participate in the project to begin in the fall of 2003 . The project requires the schools to follow an assessment schedule related to program improvement. Because of lack of movement in student achievement in literacy, three schools on school improvement decided to move from the Success for All program to the research-based instruction recommended in Reading First. FY 2003-04 August - December 2003 Response to the Literacy Program Evaluation The Elementary Literacy Department reviewed the literacy program evaluation report developed by Dr. Ross and developed a plan to continue program evaluation in the future which included the following:  Continue the use of focus groups for each of the professional development programs (ELLA, Effective Literacy, Reading Recovery, Literacy Coaches, Success for All) and develop a table of the most and least effective elements. The information from the focus groups will then be used to modify the District's professional development plan.  Compare student data from the CRT and District assessments in each school to compare the academic achievement of African-American students with others as related to the instructional program and provide specific professional development based on the identified needs of the students. ..  EXHIBIT ID The staff also reviewed the section of the report related to the most effective and least effective elements of each staff development offered by the District. The following actions were taken to address the weaknesses of the professional development:  Provided additional guided reading materials to all schools to support small group instruction to ensure equitable instruction for all students.  Provided a diverse collection of books to low performing schools to ensure that a variety of texts is available for independent reading.  Modified the testing schedule ( except in Reading Excellence and Reading First schools) to accommodate the need for a more streamlined assessment plan. Literacy Achievement Data Review Dr. Ed Williams met with the Elementary Literacy Department regarding the 2003 Primary Literacy Benchmark Exam with attention to the academic achievement of African American students as compared to other students. Schools most in need were identified and assigned to specific Literacy Specialists who had the task of reviewing the testing data more closely with the assigned schools. The Elementary Literacy Department employed the services of a consultant to discuss with the Literacy Specialists the most effective approach to use with the schools in examining their data and using it to make program modifications or changes. After the consultant's visit, the staff developed a plan for working with the schools. Assistance provided to the schools was varied based on the needs of the school but included inservice on the Primary Benchmark Exam and data analysis. In some schools, the principal and staff had already examined the data and outside assistance was not requested. Results of the data review confirmed that the professional development provided by the Elementary Literacy Department should include heavy emphasis on content area reading and writing. In addition to the professional development being offered on an ongoing basis to teachers grades 2-4, the Elementary Literacy Department and the Social Studies Department began working collaboratively to provide the training, resources, and materials for 5th grade teachers to integrate reading and social studies instruction. Three training sessions were held in January 2004 to model for teachers how to integrate the two areas. LRSD Reading First Project Schools The Reading First Project Schools have been visited several times during the year (2003-04) by the LSRD Reading First Coordinator, District Literacy Specialists, and the ADE Reading First Technical Assistant. The purpose of the visits is to provide assistance and to monitor the instructional program of the schools. Monitoring was done using a structured observation protocol and assistance was provided to schools in various ways such as the following:  Classroom demonstrations  Classroom observations with post observation conference  Colleague visits to exemplary classrooms  Sessions for problem-solving various aspects of the instructional program L 3 The Reading First Literacy Coaches and classroom teachers administered assessments in addition to those required by the district. In the fall of 2003 kindergarten students were given the DIBELS letter identification\nfirst grade students were given the letter identification and phoneme segmentation tests\nand the second and third grade students were given the oral reading fluency test. The coaches and classroom teachers used this information to determine students in need of intervention, and intervention plans were developed for each school. Progress monitoring was conducted on those students considered at risk or some risk in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and to make needed changes. In January 2004 kindergarten students were given the DIBELS letter identification and phoneme segmentation\nfirst grade students were given the DIBELS phoneme segmentation and oral reading fluency test\nand second and third grade students were given the DIBELS oral reading fluency test. The Developmental Spelling test was also administered to K-3 students in January 2004. The Literacy Coaches entered all of the LSRD Reading First schools' data and intervention plans into the Arkansas Reading First Data Bank. Pat Busbea and Renee Dawson, Reading First Technical Assistants monitored the data input and the development and implementation of the intervention plans. Because the Reading First Schools are predominantly African American, particular attention is being given to how the students are responding to the intervention and technical assistance is provided to schools wh\u0026lt;\nn the data indicates it is needed. Professional Development Specialized Training Based on examination of CRT, DRA and Observation Survey data, as well as teacher observation, it was determined that support and services were needed in the following areas of literacy in the lowperforming schools: phonemic awareness/phonics, spelling, oral language, and reading comprehension. Both local and nationally recognized experts in these areas of literacy were contracted to provide professional development to teachers of PreK through Grade 5. Ongoing Professional Development Ongoing professional development in literacy instruction is made available to all PreK - Grade 5 teachers. This professional development, a component of the State Smart Start Initiative, includes: Early Literacy Leaming in Arkansas (ELLA) for grades K-2 Effective Literacy for grades 2-4 The LRSD Effective Literacy 5 for grade 5 Pre Early Literacy Leaming in Arkansas (PreELLA) Pre-Kindergarten. Benchmark Preparation In response to requests from principals of the identified schools, District literacy specialists provided State Benchmark Exam preparation training to the teachers of grades 3-5 focused on the areas of \"Writing On Demand\" and \"Constructed Response\". Technical Assistance Technical Assistance in Literacy was provided to classroom teachers at the Elementary Schools identified for School Improvement. The focus and the intensity of the assistance were based on the particular needs of each teacher related to instruction during the 2  hour Literacy Block - Reading Workshop, Writing Workshop and Word Study. Reading Specialists visited each classroom in need of assistance to meet with the teacher. The specialist and teacher identified the specific needs from the following areas: Physical Setting/Context for Instruction Explicit Phonics/Spelling/Word Study Literature Circles/Literature Discussion Groups Guided Reading Instruction Shared Reading Shared Writing Strategy-Based Mini Lessons Literacy Comers Teacher Read Aloud Writing Workshop Reading Workshop Independent Reading Benchmark Prep The specialists then addressed the areas identified, including: setting up Literacy Comers, rearranging classrooms, organizing and categorizing reading materials, teaching students in both whole and small group, modeling instructional approaches, demonstrating the use of materials, assessing students and developing instructional plans. Professional books, independent reading books and sets of books for guided reading, as well as organizational materials and center supplies are also provided. Approximately 20 of the schools have employed literacy coaches to help support and accelerate change in literacy instruction to improve the achievement of all students in the area of literacy. 4 2001-2002 Program Modifications Based on Informal Program Evaluation Secondary Literacy 1. Teachers attended after school meetings with director to examine data and conduct analysis of scores of ACT AAP tests. 2. English faculty of each school spent a day together with English director and building principal in session devoted to best practices for improvement ofliteracy program. January - March 2002. 3. All building assistant principals at middle school were inserviced by director in literacy program in order to provide for more consistent supervision and coordination by including all administrators in literacy program. 4. Monthly collaboration sessions were held at all middle schools, talcing turns hosting, with dedicated topics related to modifying literacy program and practices. 5. Recognizing that secondary teachers have never been trained in the teaching of reading, Dee Bench, consultant from Denver Coalition of Business and Education was employed to lead staff development during summer of '02 for teachers to modify reading strategies and instruction. Four weeks of training took place with teachers (approximately 75) from all four core subjects in attendance. This summer inservice was a modification to include all cross curricular teachers in literacy program. 2002-2003 1. Teachers met with director to assist in production of curriculum for writing in order to be able to consistently deliver quality program elements. Evaluation of current practice and focus on optimum results were goals. Spring - Summer '02. New Writing Curriculum was put into use 02-03. Teachers were inserviced school by school during preschool work days on use of new curriculum. Committee of teachers for curriculum development: Brenda Bankston, Mabelvale Middle School Barbara Brandon, Southwest Middle School Lisa Lewis, Pulaski Heights Middle School Sarah Schutte, Cloverdale Middle School Alison Hargis, Central High School Dr. Rhonda Fowler, Central High School Emily Lewis, Parkview High School Carol Carter, Hall High School Peggy Thompson, Fair High School Sandra Nichols, McClellan High School Karen Shofner, McClellan High School 2. Director met with building principals during early morning sessions to introduce new curriculum for purposes of effectively evaluating classroom instruction and to provide basis for collaborative program evaluation. Fall '02. 3. Analysis of data from all tests and sessions with individual schools to modify areas of emphasis according to areas of need. It was discovered that our students do well on the ~  EXHIBIT f f_ mechanics and usage areas while the writing in content areas is weaker. Strategies were developed to practice and teach these skills. 4. Practice kits were developed by the English office and distributed to every middle school teacher for use in modification of literacy program in terms of test preparation. 5. Consultation with outside expert in reading comprehension for older readers to evaluate next steps and current status oflowest achieving students. Summer '02- '03. (Need for literacy coaches in high school was determined and, as a result, three are now in place at three lowest performing high schools, based on ACTAAP.) 6. Teachers met during summer 2003 to evaluate and modify urriculum producing an amending document. Survey given to all English teachers prior to meeting and results discussed and useful for changes made. Committee to revise English Curriculum: Wes Zeigler, Southwest Middle School Lisa Lewis, Pulaski Heights Middle School Billie Wallace, Parkview High School Beverly Maddox, Henderson Middle School Peggy Thompson, Fair High School Louisa Rook, Cloverdale Middle School Carol Carter, Hall High School Joan Bender, ALC Jennifer Moore, Forest Heights Middle School Alison Hargis, Central High School Cherry Robinson, McClellan High School 7. ESL Supervisor and director met to discuss and evaluate materials as they relate to program's effectiveness for ESL and low-level learners. Materials were purchased for these students as a result. Summer '03. 8. Consultant from Denver Coalition returned for one week of further training in reading instruction strategies for secondary students. 2003-2004 1. Based on being placed on School Improvement list, Associate Superintendent and director met to discuss literacy program at low performing middle school and to write plan for improvement following detailed audit. 2. Director has met with middle school principals and high school principals separately to discuss progress and evaluate future steps for increasing effectiveness of program and greater achievement of lower-achieving students.. September '03. 3. Personnel involved with audit of middle school met with building principal and vice principal to evaluate literacy program and discuss focus for improving student achievement through literacy program. 4. Bi-Monthly meetings to evaluate programs and problems and collaborate on strategies for improvement held with director and high school literacy coaches. Five meetings held, August - October '03. 5. Session was held for disaggregating data - school by school and teacher by teacher - for recent performances on SAT 9 and ACT AAP to evaluate successes and areas and students and teachers needing improvement for high schools. August - September '03 . 6. Meeting with department chairs and director to disaggregate data for middle school to evaluate successes and denote areas needing improvement in program. Sept. '03. 7. SREB consultant meeting with literacy coaches to evaluate effectiveness oftest preparation strategies and plan for improvements. Sept. '03. 8. In response to data, sessions have been held at most schools with some or all of faculty in open-ended responses. Teachers have made many modifications to classroom instruction based on the experiential sessions involving reading, writing, and scoring with a rubric. 9. Implem~tation of reading intervention for lowest performing ninth and eighth graders at three high schools and two middle schools began. One middle school uses same intervention for sixth and seventh as well. 10. Information and evaluation session held February 04 for all building principals and key administrators on reading intervention with proposals for expansion of program in 04-05. 11. All middle schools have committed to a day long inservice for their English teachers to review workshop structure for literacy program. April- May 04. On-going 1. Director and Middle School Specialist meet often to discuss and evaluate progress, problems, and to set trainings, meetings, and interventions to correct and further progress. Attention to both lowest achievers and highest achievers is focus of discussions. Calendars are aligned and coordinated at these meetings. 2. Director and Middle School Specialist meet after school visits to evaluate implementation of literacy program strategies and content and to determine plans for improvement, especially as it relates to lower-achieving students. Weekly, at least. 3. Director communicates often and as requested to address individual problems in buildings with principals and teachers. 4. Middle School Specialist works intensely with new teachers to improve implementation of curriculum and literacy program. 5. Continue to provide training in preparing teachers in ACTAAP open-ended responses. 6. Middle School Specialist working closely with social studies department in providing literacy best practice training to assist in reading in social studies content. 7. Participation in faculty meetings by director and specialist to modify program implementation across curriculum. 8. Increase efforts to provide literacy coaches in all secondary schools. 9. Create, distribute and compile data from a survey evaluating the effectiveness of the literacy coaches. (In May 04 set date for survey June 04) 10. Develop an action plan for providing specific inservices for high school English teachers Spring 2004. 11 . Department Chairs meet monthly to discuss hurdles, issues, celebrations, and to communicate openly about the literacy programs. These meetings are separate for middle school and high school. These meetings serve as a means of communicating curriculum items, special events, new developments, and reminders to all English teachers from the district office as well as collaboration. Secondary Literacy Evaluation Team January 16, 2004 Suzi Davis, Chair Prograqi Modifications as a Result of Analysis of the CREP Report  Continue to provide training to whole faculties in ACT AAP open-ended responses and rubric scoring. January, February, March, 2004  Continue cross-curricular unit development and training in workshops  Communicate with principals on the need for intense support for the literacy program. January,2004  Increase efforts to provide literacy coaches for all secondary schools  Create, distribute and compile data from a survey evaluating the effectiveness of the literacy coaches. A date will be set in May for a June meeting to discuss the results of this survey.  All eight middle schools have committed to a day long inservice for their English teachers to review the Read/Write Workshop structure. During this inservice, plans will be made for collaborations among schools for next year. April, 2004  Develop an action plan for providing specific inservices for high school English teachers. Spring 2004 CREP Center for Research in Educational Por~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITERACY PROGRAM EVALUATION Steven M. Ross John Nunnery Lana Smith Aaron McDonald Allan Sterb1nsky Center for Research In Educational Policy Un1vers1ty of Memphis 325 Browning Hall Memphis, TN 38152 Toll Free: 1-866-670-6147 November 2003 ~  EXHIBIT I E Little Rock School District Literacy Program Evaluation Executive Summary The present report provides the results from a study of the different literacy programs used in the Little Rock School District (LRSD). After expending substantial effort and resources to improve the reacting ability of students in the district, administrators at LRSD wanted to examine the effectiveness of the clifferent programs used within the district for literacy instruction. To facilitate this examination, the Center for Research in Educational Policy (CREP) at The University of Memphis was employed to provide an independent, third party evaluation. The evaluation methodology and data analysis were oriented around the following research questions: 1. What are teacher perceptions of and reactions to the different literacy programs? 2. After controlling for gender, eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch, and prior achievement, clid African American students exhibit similar levels of academic achievement as other students? 3. What proportion of the variance in 2003 literacy achievement was uniquely attributable to whether students were African American? 4. What was the trend in the achievement of African American students on the Literacy Benchmark examination from 2001 to 2003? 5. Were differences in achievement gains between African American students and other students similar at different grade levels and for clifferent test instruments? 6. Was there a relationship between the literacy program implemented at the elementary schools, school composition variables (i.e., school poverty and percentage of African American students enrolled), and the achievement of African American students? Method The evaluation design was based on both quantitative student achievement data as well as qualitative data from K-12 faculty members who are responsible for literacy instruction. The primary data sources were (a) a questionnaire completed by teachers, (b) focus groups conducted with faculty members representing different literacy programs in the district, and (c) student achievement data including the Literacy Benchmark scale score, SAT-9 Reading subscale score, and the SAT-9 Language subscale score. During the 2002-2003 school year, two CREP researchers conducted seven focus groups at the Neighborhood Resource Center using a structured interview guide. Each focus group was approximately one-hour in duration. Teachers signed a permission form to be interviewed and were given assurance that their comments would be confidential and anonymous. The sessions were audiotape-recorded and supplemented with the researchers' hand-written notes. The Literacy Program Teacher Questionnaires were printed and shipped to LRSD personnel. The district staff members clisseminated the questionnaires to the individual schools along with instructions for completing and returning the forms to the district. After the district staff received the completed forms, they were sent to CREP for analysis. Similarly, district Pagel of 47 personnel assembled the student achievement data into an electronic format. The data files were then sent to CREP researchers for analysis. The focus group and surveys were analyzed thematically and descriptively, respectively. A synthesis was then developed to highlight findings by literacy program and grade level (e.g., elementary and secondary) as provided by the district. The achievement methodology and analysis is discussed in the achievement section below. Results Teacher Focus Groups and Literacy Program Teacher Questionnaire A synthesis of themes and related findings from the seven focus groups and teacher questionnaire is provided in \"bulleted\" format for a concise overview. The reader is encouraged to examine the full report for detailed findings. Most Effective Program Elements (Elementary)  Professional development (PD) when received  New materials  Emergent literacy/readiness skills for Kindergarten  Positive impact on student writing  Literacy Coaches (in RR program)  Providing instruction at students' level Most Effective Program Elements (Secondary)  Positive Impact on student writing  Paired reading (instructional strategy)  Portfolios and interactive journals Least Effective Program Elements (Elementary)  Inconsistent implementation across and within schools  Texts not aligned with SAT-9  Some leveled texts and vocabulary are not appropriate  Transient student population is problematic  Parent/community involvement is not at desired levels Least Effective Program Elements (Secondary)  Gaps in training that is offered to teachers  Lack of consistency in literacy instruction and programs (across and within schools)  Lack of teacher support from non-literacy subject areas  Parent/community involvement is not at desired levels Teacher support for the Programs (Elementary)  Level of support varies across schools (and within schools) Page 2 of 47  Support for ELLA and Effective Literacy is high because the\n- fit well with what teachers were already doing or moving toward anyway  SFA is most polarized (love or hate the program) Teacher support (Secondary)  Generally positive attitudes, but not much support from non-literacy teachers District support (Elementary)  Lack of consistency for teachers to attend training (substitutes\navailability of training)  District provides materials, but could also use teacher aides in the classroom District support (Secondary)  Literacy coaches would be beneficial  Need to use district time set aside for inservices to plan a more comprehensive literacy approach Professional Development (Elementary)  Quality of professional development received has been mixed, but teachers are generally positive  Literacy Coach (providing leadership and training) has been beneficial  General consensus that there is a lack of ongoing training (or opportunity to attend recommended/mandated number of days) Professional Development (Secondary)  Quality of professional development received has been mixed  Would like more training  Teachers do not see training sessions as tying together. Not sure what \"big picture\" literacy plan is Classroom Changes (Elementary)  Positive impact on Kindergarten students  More emphasis on student writing  Students are learning reading strategies  There has been some return to traditional instructional practices Classroom Changes (Secondary)  More cooperative learning (with mixed results)  Special Education teachers assist students in classes (instead of pullout program) Impact on Students (Elementary)  Learned better cooperation skills  Increased confidence in reading  Students are learning reading strategies Page 3 of 47 Impact on Students (Secondary)  There is some increased motivation to read  Assessments and leveled readers are creating more success and confidence for students  Students are writing more often Impact on Teachers (Elementary)  Negative impact on time and stamina  Additional instructional strategies and materials have been beneficial  Increased sharing of ideas Impact on Teachers (Secondary)  Increased sharing of strategies  Focus on bringing lower performing students to proficiency level  High school teachers had lower levels of agreement on all survey items (comparatively) Student Achievement Data The primary purpose of research focus was to examine the achievement of African American students in reading and language arts in the Little Rock School District. The five achievement oriented research questions (#2 - #5 above) were used to guide the methodology and analyses. Methodology Subjects of the study included all students enrolled in grades 3 to 11 in the Little Rock School District during the 2002-2003 school year for whom 2003 Literacy Benchmark or 2003 SAT-9 scores were available. This included a total of 11,934 students, of whom 23.4% were Caucasian, 68.2% were African-American, and 48.5% were certified as eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. Three measures were used to assess literacy: the Literacy Benchmark scale score (Grades 4, 6, and 8), and the SAT-9 Reading subscale score, and SAT-9 Language subscale score (both Grades 5, 7, and 10). Analyses District-wide achievement effects. The basic analytic model used to gauge district-wide achievement effects was a 2 (free lunch status) X 2 (gender) X 2 (African-American, nonAfrican American) analysis of variance (ANOVA). This basic model was adapted to each grade level to reflect: (a) the availability of achievement data from the prior year, in which case a 2 X 2 X 2 analysis of covariance (ANCOV A) was used\n(b) the specific 2003 outcome data that were available at each grade level (either Literacy Benchmark scores or SAT9 scores)\nand (c) the number of outcome variables. School composition and program effects. For elementary schools, information was available regarding specific literacy programs being implemented in the schools. For 5th grade, a two level hierarchical linear model (HLM) was performed to examine relationships between Page 4 of 47 school composition factors (aggregate poverty, mean achievement at pretest. and percentage African American enrollment), school literacy programs, and student achievement. Longitudinal cohort performance on Benchmark Examinations. For fourth and eighth grades, three consecutive years of Literacy Benchmark Performance Level data were available. The percentage of African American students scoring in Below Basic, Basic, Proficient. and Advanced categories was computed for each year from 2001 to 2003 to provide a basis for examining overall trends in performance across time. Elementary Level Results Below, conclusions and results based on analyses performed on fourth and fifth grade data are presented by research question. After controlling for gender, eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch, and prior achievement, did African American students exhibit similar levels of academic achievement as other students?  African American students had substantially lower absolute performance than did other students.  The academic gains on literacy tests were lower for African American students than for other students. What proportion of the variance in 2003 literacy achievement was uniquely attributable to whether students were African American?  Although there was a significant relationship between African American status and student achievement, the proportion of variance in academic performance attributable to African American status was very low-4.6% for fourth grade, and 5.7% for fifth grade. What was the trend in the achievement of African American students on the Literacy Benchmark examination from 2001 to 2003?  The performance of African American fourth grade students on the Benchmark Literacy examination improved dramatically between 2001 and 2003, with nearly half performing at a \"Below Basic\" level in 2001, compared to only one-fifth in 2003. Was there a relationship between the literacy program implemented at the school, school composition variables, and the achievement of African American students?  No significant relationship was observed between the type of literacy program implemented and the achievement of African American students.  The percentage of African American students enrolled in a school did not predict overall achievement or the achievement of African American students.  School poverty, as measured by the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, had a negative effect on the achievement gains of students. Page 5 of 47 Secondary Level Results The secondary conclusions and results by research question are as follows: After controlling for gender, eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch, and prior achievement. did African American students exhibit similar levels of academic achievement as other students?  The absolute level of achievement of African American students was substantially lower than that of other students of similar gender and free lunch eligibility status.  Generally, the gains in academic achievement of African American students were similar to those of other students in grades 6 to 11. What proportion of the variance in 2003 literacy achievement was uniquely attributable to whether students were African American?  When data on prior achievement were available, the proportion of variance in 2003 achievement attributable to African American status was quite low at the secondary level, ranging from 0% to 5%. What was the trend in the achievement of African American students on the Literacy Benchmark examination from 2001 to 2003?  The performance of African American 8th graders on the Literacy Benchmark exam improved substantially and consistently between 2001 and 2003, with the percentage scoring \"Below Basic\" dropping from 48.5% to 34.5%, and the percentage scoring \"Proficient\" increasing from 14.9% to 23.9%. Were differences in achievement gains between African American students and other students similar at different grade levels and for different test instruments?  From the 5th to the 8th grade cohort, the achievement gains of African American students became more similar to those of other students, and for some subgroups surpassed those of other students in 8th grade.  The gap in achievement gains was greater on the SAT9 than on the Literacy Benchmark examination. Presumably, the Literacy Benchmark examination is more closely aligned to the mandated curriculum than is the SAT9, which is intentionally designed to be insensitive to curricular differences. Summary and Conclusions The Little Rock School District is commended for the emphasis given to increasing literacy in all schools in the district and not just those in the lowest performing strata. The state and local initiatives in literacy for early learners, including ELLA and Effective Literacy, are well grounded in current research of best practice. In addition, the Reading Recovery and Success for All models are among the best researched and proven programs in the nation for lower-performing students. Impressions from interviews and survey data, however, are that Page 6 of 47 these programs are often perceived as separate and discrete entities instead of integral to a district comprehensive literacy program. Teachers describe themselves or their schools as \"doing\" ELLA or Success for All and only the certified tutors 'doing\"' Reading Recovery. Middle and high school teachers' comments seemed to indicate that they also did not perceive themselves as being involved in a literacy plan beyond the traditional roles they have had as English teachers. Thus, it is recommended that the district's plan, or \"big picture\" of literacy, be developed and presented to teachers in a format that communicates how each program. school. grade level, and teacher contributes to and accomplishes literacy goals. The professional development in basic literacy has been well received and represents an enormous accomplishment for the district. Management and delivery of the professional development, however, needs to be made more consistent and available to teachers. The primary concerns voiced by teachers were scheduling problems, inadequate space and availability of training for the numbers of teachers needing to be trained, retraining for teachers who change grade levels, training for new teachers, and obtaining qualified substitutes for teachers while they attend training. The impressions of professional development communicated by upper grade teachers and those who were not implementing special \"programs\" were that professional development has been minimal, targeted to current \"hot\" topics (e.g., portfolios), and inconsistent in quality. Teachers' perceptions of the impact of literacy programs were extremely mixed. Writing and composition were literacy areas that all teachers agreed had been emphasized and improved in their schools and classrooms as a consequence of literacy initiatives in the district. Some of the positive comments relative to ELLA had more to do with the materials teachers had received as a part of the training than the new ideas they had been provided. During the focus groups, the most impressive level of agreement that teachers voiced was by teachers who had Reading Recovery teachers as Literacy Coaches in their schools. The concept of highly trained Literacy Coaches being placed in and available to all elementary schools is a national issue presently and it is recommended that the district find ways to support this concept not only in elementary schools with large at-risk populations, but in all schools in the district. Regarding student achievement, substantial differences exist in the overall achievement of African American students and other students in LRSD. However, the differences in academic gains tend to be smaller at higher grade levels. The three-year trend in Literacy Benchmark scores shows substantial, sustained improvement in the academic achievement of African American students between 2001 and 2003. African American status of the student, as well as the percentage of African American students enrolled in a school, explain only small amounts of variance in student outcomes compared to prior achievement. No\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1064","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1064"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["639 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda RECEIVED MAR 2 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting MARCH2004 \"D (/J! --,m c::c cc:: ~ ~ ..... r-ril J ~:l O,,,,m,, J~ Z=E Om m r-n 0 I: m \u0026gt;~  \"D \"c:':0,,, \"D ..... :\"'!(! n:,\n, =Im \u0026gt;n :::!8 Oz ~~ z \"' I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING March 25, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Baseline Elementary Choir Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: IV. A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Baseline Elementary School - Eleanor Cox Southwest Produce - Kay Moore Metropolitan Careet \u0026amp; Technical Center - Mike Peterson Pulaski Technical College - Larry Lewallen Williams Traditional Magnet School - Mary Menking \u0026amp; Anne Pattillo AARP - Maria Diaz C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. First Tee Golf \u0026amp; Life Skills Program - Tony Hourston E. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update n-,:, ,). l.,.\n,m:..0. ,..._ -, 31: Oz o\u0026gt; e:~ m-,,\n:o C: -z\non o,...- c\u0026lt;5 r-z nu, \u0026gt; F= n a,\n.,:.. m\u0026gt; ~~\nom ,..\n:o u, u,\nz om :1:C C: nn =I\u0026gt; ,:\n-\u0026lt; mi5 zz u, Regular Board Meeting March 25, 2004 Page2 V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes Regular Meeting - 02-26-04 Special Meeting - 03-11-04 B. Personnel Changes C. Ratification of PN Agreement* D. Salary Adjustments, 2003-04 school year* E. Student Calendar - 2004-05* VI. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: A. Submission of 2004 Carol M. White P. E. Program Proposal VII. SCHOOL SERVICES: A. Naming of Facilities - - Mabelvale Magnet Middle School VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report/ Annual Audit Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XI. ADJOURNMENT * Requires Suspension of the Rules I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME STUDENT PERFORMANCE 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS D. FIRSTTEE PRESENTATION E. LR CTA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 March 25, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education ~J Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Partners in Education Program: New partnerships The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnerships: Baseline Elementary School and Southwest Produce Metropolitan Career - Technical Center and Pulaski Technical College Williams Traditional Magnet School and AARP ~ .n..\"..' a, C: C: 0 g!\nll m\"\"' ....  C:\"' ~!!5  Z -\u0026lt;Ii: mm .z.. . !=' n 0 z !!l ::a C: n... . lz5 ::a m ~ !'\"  C: 0 :::\n0 ill ~ ~ ~ BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Partnership Agreement between Baseline Elementary and Soutwest Produce Southwest Produce is willing to: Make food/ice donations for special events Make food donations to help needy families, if needed Sponsor one or more students for Job Shadowing Kay Moore will mentor a female student and will visit with said student at least once a month at Baseline Be willing for students to make a fieldtrip to the store in the line of academic study or career education Participate in our annual community service project by donating or getting food items at cost Display student work in the business Baseline Elementary is willing to: Provide a calendar of events and invite employees to appropriate school functions Provide appropriate tokens of appreciation for partnership Help with a special project, such as a clean-up day or other 3623 Baseline Road  Phone (501) 447-3700 Fax (501) 447-3701  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Partnership Between Pulaski Technical College and Metropolitan Career and Technical Center Metropolitan Career and Technical Center will: 1. Recognize Pulaski Technical College as a partner in education under the Career Links articulation agreement an advertise this agreement on the Schools website under the Metropolitan sub link and in the monthly newsletter distributed to parents and students throughout the district. 2. Recognize Pulaski Technical College as a Partner In Education at the next Little Rock School Board meeting. 3. Display the plaque received at the Little Rock School Board meeting recognizing the partnership with Pulaski Technical College in the Central office at Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. 4. Metropolitan Career and Technical Center will identify qualified students who meet the the requirements outlined in the Career Links agreement and recommend the for this program. 5. Arrange field trips for students and/or parents to tour Pulaski Technical College coordinated through the Tech/Prep Coordinator. 6. Provide a display for Pulaski Technical College to recruit potential students and parents to review during Open House, Parent or Advisory Board Day and Job Fair. Pulaski Technical College will: 1. Provide a representative to serve on the Advisory Council to Metropolitan Career and Technical Center's various programs in order to provide guidance and strategic planning support regarding the enhancement of the school's curriculum, recruitment policies and the marketing of programs. 2. Provide technical credit toward a degree area for students at Metropolitan Career and Technical Center who meet the career links qualifications. 3. Provide an opportunity for field trips and visiting the campus. 4. Provide assistance with the annual Skills USA Competition in Hot Springs 5. Provide assistance with Open House at Metropolitan Career and Technical center. !=' (') 0 z !!l\na ~... cz5 fl:l ~ !'T1 \u0026gt; C: C ~ ill\na m c8 ~ WILLIAMS TRADITIONAL MAGNET SCHOOL A CHOICE FOR EXCELLENCE AARP Arkansas and Williams Traditional Magnet School Partnership Establishment The AARP Foundation leads positive social change to help people 50 and over age with independence, dignity and purpose. The Arkansas State Office and Information Center are both located in Little Rock. All AARP chapters are non-government, non-partisan, non-profit community service organizations that are open to all local AARP members. The AARP offers many programs, services, and many other subjects of interest to their members and their families. There are numerous employees who have a wide range of interests, talents, experiences, and ideas, and possibly will be willing to share these for the benefit of students at Williams Magnet School. Williams Traditional Magnet School is a tri-district magnet school operating in Pulaski County as a part of the LRSD. There is a staff of approximately 40 and a student enrollment of approximately 460. Despite all of the help afforded by the three school districts whose children attend, the school is always in need of additional resources in connection with the education provided to students. The staff at Williams Magnet School completed a school needs assessment to determine needed services and resources for the 2003-04 school year. The Partnership Council will use this information to match resources and needs throughout the school year. Activities will be coordinated through the AARP team leader and the Williams Magnet School team leader. The Partnership Council will attend an initial conference, and will then meet as the need arises to assess the effectiveness of the Partnership. Communication will be open and constant. *Proposed plan of activities for the 2003-04 school year: AARP Grandparent's Day Activities Student incentives/awards for Grandparent's Day Grandparent seminars/classes Provide educational resources Assembly guests Wjljiams Magnet School Student/reacher participation in AARP programs Promote ongoing recognition and appreciation Send monthly newsletters Art work Participate in contests Choir performance 7301 Evergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-7100  Fax (501) 447-7101 Little Rock , Arkansas 72207 DATE: TO: FROM: '.\n4.n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" March 25, 2004 Board of Directors Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Office~ Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman,\nj\nSUBJECT: March 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects Please note that I am showing that the construction projects at Mabelvale Magnet Middle, Mann Magnet Middle and Williams Magnet Elementary are still under construction. In reality, these projects are complete except for some details that have not been completed. As an example, the area north of the replacement school at Mann is free of the portable classrooms and a parking lot is now under construction. Work on landscaping, drainage and drives at Mabelvale are nearing completion. There is still some odds and ends type work at Williams. All three (3) projects should be completed by the April 22nd Board meeting. The work for asbestos abatement and microbial remediation of Mitchell Elementary will be bid on April ?1h. When a contract is awarded, the contractor will have 60 calendar days from the time the Notice To Proceed is issued to complete the work. The drawings for renovating the building will be completed this summer. If you have any questions, please call me at 447-1146. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 !..J.,' m\n%J ~ zz m rn ~ i!5 m en !.\".,' z ~ ~ m mE .z... . :-r, ..... mn ::c C: iB m~ CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MARCH 25, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Facility Name I Proiect Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Baseline Renovation $953,520 Jul-04 Brady Addition/renovation --- ~ 73,62_1 __ Aug-04 Central Renovation - Interior -- $10,200,266 - AJ:!_g-05 --- -- ~nbar Renovation/addition $6,149,023-- -- Dec-04 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music J. A. Fair room addition $3,155,640 May-04 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851.~- - Mar-04 I-Partial Replacement -- ----,- Mann $11 ,500,000 May-04 McClellan Classroom Addition ~. 155,62_2 __ Jul-04 Parkview -- Addition $2,121,226 - Jun-04 f- - --- Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1 ,193,259 Aug_:_Qi ~ski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,0-41 ___ Aug-04 Southwest Addition t $2,000,00-0 -- Aug-04 Tech Ctr/ Metro Renovation - Addition/Renovation - Phase II I $3,679,000 __ Jun-04 Wakefield Rebuild --- ---- $5,300,000 Jul-04 -- -- -- Williams Renovation $2,106,4~ Mar-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - SPRING / SUMMER W04 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I !::st. L\nompIeuon Date Central Reflecting Pond 50000 38203 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area - --\n-- $225,000 ~ ug-04 Mitchell Building Remediation --- $165,000 - May-04 ~ -- --+--- Mitchell Renovation $2,377,493 Auo-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Proiect Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Booker Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown -- ~ 8,525 _ Booker Roof Unknown - --- Booker ADA Rest rooms TBD Unknown - Carver Media Center Expansion Unknown -Un-kn-own Chicot Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown -- -Chi-cot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm ___J13, 134--+-- Unknown --- -- --- floverdale Elementary Addition Unknown U-nk-no-wn Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD 1 -- Unkn-own Fair Park Addition Unknown Unknown - --- Remodel - $1,400,000 - Forest Heights Unknown --- --- GarJand Remodel Unknown Unknown ~yer Springs Roof Repair $161 ,752 Unknown -- --- Gibbs Addition Unknown Unknown -- - --- --- Henderson Lockers $80,876 Unknown Mablevale Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD-- Unknown McDermott Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown --- - --- -- Meadowcliff Addition Unknown Unknown -- Pulaski Hgts._MS _ Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Renovation -- - Rightsell -- -- -- --- $2,494,00Q_ 38930 ~hington Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,0~ Aug-05 Western Hills Fire Alarm Upgrade --- TBD Unknown - TB~ --- Western Hills ADA Rest rooms Un-kno-wn Woodruff Parkinq addition $193,777 Unknown CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD MARCH 25, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I t::st. 1,.\nompIe11on Date Administration Asbestos abatement - $380,495 Mar-03 Administration Fresh air system_ $55,000 Aug-03 -- - Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 - Administration Annex Energy monitoring system installation May-02 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy monitoring system installation $15,1 60 Oct-01 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting -- I ~2,000 Dec-01 Badgett Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Badgett Fire alarm I $18,250 Aug-02 --- Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system I Mar-02 Bale Partial roof replacement ' $269,587 Dec-01 Bale HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Booker Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Booker Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement -- -- -- $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 I Mar-02 Brady Energy efficient lighting $80,5[3 Sep-02 Brady Asbestos abatement $345,072 Aug-02 Carver Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01 Carver Parking lot $111 ,742 Aug-03 Central Parking Student parking $174,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System $14,500 Aug-03 Central  Purchase land for school Unknown Dec-02 Central Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 I Dec-02 Central Ceiling and wall repair $24,ooo I Oct-01 Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug-01 Central Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 ---- -- Clove-rda-le- El-em. -- Energy efficient lighting $132,678 Jul-01 $189,743 I -- Cloverdale MS ~rgy efficient lighting Jul-01 Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd Energy efficient lighting $90,665 I Aug-01 Dodd 1 Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace roof top HVAC I $215,570 I Aug-02 Facilities Service Interior renovation $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services Fire alarm I $12,000 I Aug-03 Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 I Apr-02 - I Fair Park - Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park .Asbestos abatement-ceiling I $59,310 Aug-01 J. A. Fair -- Energy efficient lighting I $277,594 Apr-01 -J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 -J. A-. Fair - Security cameras I $12,500 Jun-01 J. A. Fair Athletic Field Improvement I $38,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System I $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs I $391,871 Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC ! $485,258 I Nov-03 Forest Park Diagonal parking I $111,742 Aug-03 Forest Park - 'Energy efficient lighting I $119,788 I May-01 Fulbright - Energy efficient lighting I $134,463 Jun-01 Fulbrig_b,!_ ~ergy monitoring system installation I $11,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot I $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs I $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin i Renovation I $2,511,736 Mar-03 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation : $11,770 Jul-01 2 '.Tl .... m n % C: ~ m !JI ~ m\n,:, is z z ,m... n ~ z G) m en CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MARCH 25, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facilitv Name I I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date 1-H..,.a.-cll_ ________ __.._M,...a~j_or_r_e_nov.,.a._ti_on_\u0026amp;_a_ddition $8,637,709 Sep-03 ,_H_a_ll ________ A_s_b_e_st_os abatement $168,222 Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting__ -----,- $42,931 Jul-01 1-H_a_ll ________ Energy efficient lighting _ _ $296,707 Apr-01 1-H..,.a.-cll_ ________l_n fra_s_tr_u_cture improvements $93,657 Aug-01 Hall Intercom ----,------==-~------ _ F_eb-_01 Hall Security cameras ____ $10,600 Jun-01 ,_H_e_n_d_e_r-s~o~n~~~~~~~~~~~~-=-E~n~e-=r-gy~e- f-fi1cientlighting __-_ -_- _:-_ $193,6_7_9__ Jul-01 Henderson Roof replacement gym $107,835 May-01 1-c.H.,.e._n_d,-ers_on _____+ -A- s~b-e-st'-0-'--s' -abatement Phase I $500\n0~ Aug-01 Henderson - -- Asbestos abatement Phase2 $250,00-_0+_ --~-g--~0-2 , IRC Energy efficient lighting ___ ___ $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement ____ $43,639 Oct-01 Jefferson ==--Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm -- ___ $1]30~0-00___ Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot ___ $269,588 Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. - - Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 ~g-01 Mabelvale Elem. Replace HVAC units --- ~00,0~(J...0.,___ Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement _____ --+-- $107,000 Aug-02 'Energy efficient lighting___ ---,-- $106,598 - ~02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,7~ Aug-01 1_-a_~n_n_ _______~ A--sJ\np:_\nh-a'---l_t w.ac.lk_ -s'--- ___ -----The total $1_ 8 million f--- Dec-01 Mann _Walkway canopies ---.jis what has been Dec-01 Mann  Boiler replacement used so far on the __ Oct-01 Mann Fencing projects listed __ Sep-01 Mann _ Partial demolition/portable classroo~ completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 _Ju_l-_0_3 _McClellan __ Irrigation System $14,750  Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras $36,30_0===-=---J-un_-_0_1, McClellan __ Energy efficient lighting ____ $303,614 May-01 McClella_n_ - _ Stadium stands repair ___ _ -~- $235,000 Aug-01 McClellan Intercom __ $46,0_0_0__ Feb-02 McDermott __ Energy efficient lighting --- , $79~.4,...1.,..1,,.-+--_ Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units I $476,000 Aug-02 Meadow_c_liff------+~F-ire-'---a--,l.a..-rm---'---'----------\"----'--.$.,..1-6~,-1-7--5-----J--u~I--0-1I -----------+------- -------------~------- Meadowcliff Meado_w_c.l,,i.f-f -- Metroe9I~ Metropol~ Metropolitan Mitchell --- -- Mitchell --- Mitchell Oakhurst Asbestos abatement ! $253,412 Aug-02 Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Replace cooling tower -----~ $37,203 Dec-00 Replace shop vent system __ ~0.000 May-01 Energy monitoring system installation $17,145 Aug-01 Energy efficient lighting -- ---,- - $103,642 1 Apr-01 Energy monitoring system installation __ $16.~ Jul-01 ! Asbestos abatement $13,000 Jul-01 HVAC renovation , $237,2ll._L Aug-01 ,_O_tte_r C_re_e_k___ _ __ Energy monitoring system installation $10,6_9_5__ May-01 Otter Creek ---~E_nergy efficient lighting 1 $81,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement 1 $10,000 Aug-02 Otter Creek --- ~Parking lot I $138,029 . Aug-02 _Otte_r Creek ____ 6 classroom addition 1 $888,778 __ O_c_t-_0_2 IP arking Improvements I __$c -c1,_4-2-~,5..4..,~1_ ___A_ ,.u.~g~-0,--3,-1 HVAC controls I $210,000 Jun-02 Otter Creek Parkview Parkview Roof replacement I $273,877 Sep-01 Parkview 1Exteriorlights 1 $10,784 Nov-00 Parkview ---\nHVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls -~- $301,938 Aug-01 Locker replacement ____ $12_0,~000~--- Aug-01 Energy efficient lighting , - ~15,000 Jun-01 Parkview Parkview 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD MARCH 25, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Proiect Descriotion I Cost I Est. Completion Date Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move plat ground $17,000 Dec-02 Rightsell Energy efficient lighting I $84,898 Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting i $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC I $539,175 Aug-01 Rockefeller Parking addition I $111 ,742 Aug-02 Romine Ast\n\u0026gt;estos abatement I $10,000 Apr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $3,534,675 Mar-03 Security/Transportation Bus cameras I $22,500 -- Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement I $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest New roof I $690,000 -- Oct-03 Southwe-st -- Energy efficient lighting --- $168,719 Jan-02 -- Southwest - Drainage / street widening $250,000 Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation I ~ 4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment ~ alarm-- --- ~ --$- 9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Dec-01 - Technology Upgrade I Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry 'Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 Terry I Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Security cameras I $8,000  Jun-01 Wakefield - -- Energy efficient lighting $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Nov-02 Washington - -- Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $182,241 Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 Aug-01 Watson Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson - Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 Aug-02 Western Hills Asbestos abatement $191,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 Jul-01 Williams -- 'Parking expansions I $183,717 Dec-03 Williams - Energy efficient lighting $122,719 Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion I $1,263,876 Feb-04 -Wilson - Parking Expansion $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation $246,419 Auo-02 4 .?.,' m ~ !S z z ,m.. n $\nz C) m \"' 0.., z ~ ill m 31: zm ..... !'\" \u0026gt; C 0 ~ ~ \"' ill c8 ::!l :,-, ..... Ill :::c .C. , ~ m Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR.KANSAS March 25, 2004 To: Board of Directors @ From: Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - March This is the fifty-third communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and ewspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff. !II \"0 m\no is z z m rn $= z C) m \"' fl \"0 z ~ ~ m\ni:: m z -\u0026lt; Audit Report - March 2004 Page 2 of2 Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This infom1ation is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Participating in planning for Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-44 7-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: March 25, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  Technology training projects are continuing. UALR Cyberteacher summer program applicants have been selected and will participate for 6 weeks in June and July. District-wide professional development for teachers will take place on May 3 and will emphasize technology integration.  E-rate applications for 2004-2005 were all filed on or before the deadline of February 4. LRSD filed for approximately $1. 7 million in discounts on telecommunications services, LAN electronics, and video systems. We currently have outstanding applications for 3 different years for which we have received no notification. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins - Technical February 26, 2004 - March 25, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. !J:l \"ti m\n,::, is z z ,m... (\") ~ z c\n, m U\u0026gt; !\"' \"ti z ~ ~ m ~ zm ..... !=' ~ s\n:\n,::, -\u0026lt;  l: C: 5!l ~ zm ..... U\u0026gt; !\" 5!l C: C zm ..... (\") j!: zm ~ DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS March 25, 2004 Board of Education ~everly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. r.,\u0026gt;, z ~ ~ m\ns:: .zm.. . !\" ~ = C mz... . n .\u0026gt;.... mz ~\nc Personnel Changes Page 2 March 25, 2004 NAME Cheatham, Mary Jane Reason: Retired Wold, Donald Reason: Contract Ended Andrews, Ashley Beggs, Melinda Brown, Carleton Brown, V erlyn POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Math II 8-21-73 6-21 SOUTHWEST 3-3-04 TCH925 1-6-03 66-13 CURR/INSTR. 3-1-04 ADN12 New Certified Emplovees Elem ill 2-16-04 1-01 BALE TCH925 English 1-20-04 4-19 CENTRAL TCH925 English 1-20-04 4-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Tutor 1-10 1-10 FAJRPARK TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 54700.00 52248.00 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 25554.23 annual 11845.45 prorated 30553.00 annual 14162.59 prorated 34714.00 annual 11752.14 prorated Personnel Changes Page 3 March 25, 2004 NAME Cain, Mary Carter, Arrel Crossley, Demetria Dyer, Julie Farrar, Neoma Green, Michele Harder, Melanie POSITION SCHOOL ElemV GEYER SPRINGS Spec. Ed. ALC Math TCH925 Elem IV STEPHENS Elem III CHICOT Elem IV BALE Physical Science FAIR START DATE END DATE 1-20-04 2-9-04 2-13-04 1-22-04 2-16-04 2-23-04 1-20-04 SALARY CLASS 1-04 TCH925 1-06 SPE925 1-04 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 2-03 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 28588.00 annual 13251.73 prorated 30630.00 annual 11964.84 prorated 29409.00 annual 10875.20 prorated 29609.00 annual 13416.58 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 26546.00 annual 8986.93 prorated 14447.00 annual 6696.79 prorated \u0026gt; ~~ \u0026gt;' !\n~ Z::c ~..,,,8.... !JI: en 31::m 31::\na:I en~ Cm a, en ~ ~ r\u0026gt; \"D z \u0026gt; C)\na:, m m\nI: .zm.. . !=' en \u0026gt; \u0026gt;\na:, -\u0026lt; \u0026gt; ~ C: e..n.. m31:: z... . en 'e.\".n.. C: C .mz.. . (\") ,\u0026gt;.... mz ~\na:, Personnel Changes Page 4 March 25, 2004 NAME Harrison, Kenneth Home, Wanda King, Carmelita Kuhn, Scarlett Larry,Betty Lockhart, Kelly POSITION SCHOOL Geometry HALL Special Ed HENDERSON English FAIR Elem ill STEPHENS Typing START DATE END DATE 1-22-04 2-17-04 2-23-04 1-26-04 2-5-04 MABELV ALE MID. Algebra 2-16-04 PUL. HGTS. MID. SALARY CLASS 4-18 TCH925 1-04 SPE925 4-06 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 46889.00 annual 21246.53 prorated 28588.00 annual 10273.81 prorated 35633.00 annual 12063.25 prorated 29609.00 annual 14033.43 prorated 19095.62 annual 7658.14 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 March 25, 2004 NAME McDaniel, Yvonne Miller, Owyla Muhammad, Khaleelah Neumeier, Cynthia Olivares, Lizete Parr, Patricia Smith, Michelle POSITION SCHOOL Elem ill CLOVERDALE EL. Special Ed MANN Elem IV STEPHENS Elem II MCDERMOTT Spanish CENTRAL ElemV FAIR.PARK Elem II MCDERMOT START DATE END DATE 1-14-04 3-2-04 1-14-04 1-5-04 1-6-04 2-9-04 1-5-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 TCH925 1-03 SPE925 1-02 TCH925 1-07 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 4-14 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 26546.00 annual 12719.96 prorated 28359.00 annual 8714.48 prorated 27056.00 annual 13809.83 prorated 31651.00 annual 16320.05 prorated 27567.00 annual 14070.66 prorated 42805.00 annual 16720.70 prorated 26546.00 annual 13687.78 prorated  ~~  ' !\n~ Z::,: ~8 'TII'\"\" !I:\"'\n1:m ~~ Cm CD v, ~ !.,\",' z  C) ~ m !I: mz --\n!=' ~ s\n:\na -\u0026lt;  0 \u0026lt;- C: \"--'\n!I: mz --\n\"' rn \"--'\nC: 0 mz --\n0 ,.... m z 0 \na Personnel Changes Page 6 March 25, 2004 NAME Treat, Heather Watkins, Cindy Williams, Frank Wise, Marshalette Withers, Aaron ONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Elem I CHICOT Spanish DUNBAR Music START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 1-14-04 1-20-04 MABELV ALE EL. English 1-12-04 HENDERSON Music 1-5-04 ROMINE Certified Promotion Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 1-01 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 6-08 TCH925 4-04 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 26546.00 annual 11060.83 prorated 40839.00 annual 19568.69 prorated 39461.00 annual 19524.97 prorated 32595.00 annual 15957.57 prorated 28588.00 annual 14398.52 prorated Personnel Changes Page 7 March 25, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignationsfferminations Non-Certified Em(?lovees Bradford, Ollie Instr. Aide 8-24-81 1-10 Reason: Retired BALE 3-1-04 INA925 Carter, Danny Instr. Aide 2-10-97 2-01 Reason: None Given WASHINGTON 3-12-04 INA925 Graham, Linda Child Nutrition 1-7-04 3-01 Reason: Personal BALE 2-16-04 FSH550 Holloway, Jack Labor Driver 5-25-01 40-04 Reason: None Given FACILITY SERV. 3-9-04 MAINT. Holmes, Gloria Care 12-23-02 3-07 Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 CARE Homer, Bobbie Instr. Aide 9-7-93 1-04 Reaspn: Deceased BALE 2-25-04 INA185 Johnson, Eloyce Care 9-3-02 1-07 Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 CARE Lambert, Danielle Care 10-6-03 2-01 Reason: None Given CARE 2-13-04 CARE Lee, Charlotte Care 5-1-00 1-11 Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 CARE Miles, Janet Care 9-9-02 3-07 Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 14067.00 15916.00 8130.00 18384.00 7.68 12163.00 6.97 6.97 7.53 7.68 \u0026gt; ~~ \u0026gt;\" ~~ Z::c ~..,,8.. 31: en 31:m ~~ Cm CD en ~\nc -\u0026lt; p z\"0 \u0026gt; C)\nc m m :I: zm --\u0026lt; ~ en \u0026gt; \u0026gt;\nc -\u0026lt; \u0026gt; c0. .. C: en --\u0026lt; 31: zm e--n\u0026lt; !\" en --\u0026lt; C: 0 zm --\u0026lt; n ,\u0026gt;.... mz C \u0026gt;\nc Personnel Changes Page 8 March 25, 2004 NAME Ray, Dwight Reason: Personal Ricks, Anjanette Reason: None Given Ridgel, Richard Reason: None Given Simmons, Lakisha Reason: None Given Smittie, Carol Reason: None Given Todd, Freeman Reason: None Given Warren, Alfred Reason: None Given Watson, Izora Reason: None Given White, Gloria Reason: Deceased Whittington, Sherkeyer Reason: None Given Williams, Henrietta Reason: None Given POSITION SCHOOL Custodian FOREST PARK Care CARE Custodian None Given Care CARE Care CARE Care CARE Instr. Aide STEPHENS Child Nutrition MANN Child Nutrition START DATE END DATE 9-6-04 1-30-04 3-17-03 1-21-04 1-6-03 1-15-04 10-6-03 1-20-04 12-8-03 1-20-04 11-17-03 2-2-04 9-10-03 2-27-04 8-12-03 2-23-04 8-19-03 CHILD NUTRITION 2-23-04 Care 12-2-02 CARE 1-21-04 Custodian 12-15-97 BASELINE 2-24-04 SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS925 1-05 CARE 1-02 CUS12 1-03 CARE 1-14 CARE 1-03 CARE 1-04 INA925 3-01 FSH550 2-01 FSMEAL 3-17 CARE 1-07 CUS!2 ANNUAL SALARY 10329.00 6.68 13955.00 6.43 7.93 6.43 12163.00 8130.00 11593.00 9.15 16736.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 March 25, 2004 NAME Williams, Carla Reason: None Given Wilson, Carolyn Reason: Personal Belcher, Aretha Carlock, Phillip Davis, Reshaunda Frizzell, Jennifer Gardner, Gayle POSITION SCHOOL Care CARE Instr. Aide PUL. HGTS. MID. START DATE END DATE 9-2-03 1-20-04 8-31-87 2-18-04 SALARY CLASS 2-05 CARE 1-05 INA185 New Non-Certified Employees Clerical 3-3-04 39-12 SOUTHWEST CLKl0 Instr. Aide 2-18-04 1-06 MABELV ALE MID. INA925 Custodian 2-26-04 1-01 HALL CUS925 Instr. Aide 2-28-04 1-07 ROCKEFELLER INA12 Media Clerical 3-3-04 31-16 PARKVIEW CLK925 ANNUAL SALARY 7.22 12481.00 23304.00 annual 7117.48 prorated 12798.00 annual 4565.77 prorated 5313.00 annual 1732.50 prorated 16931.00 annual 6051.93 prorated 20676.00 annual 6378.77 prorated \u0026gt; ~~ \u0026gt;  !\n!ll Z::i:: .~....8... !11:en 31:m 31:::C en~ Cm CD en ~ ~ f..l, z ~ :m:c m I: zm ..... !::\u0026gt; ~ s\n: ::c -\u0026lt; \u0026gt; c0.. .. C: e...n.. ll: mz ..... en !'\" .e..n.. C: 0 mz ..... n ,\u0026gt;... mz 0 :\u0026gt;:c Personnel Changes Page 10 March 25, 2004 NAME Germany, Lisa Howard, Vince Hyder, Keyonna Johnson, Loma Lenzie, Diann Nichols, Sherrie POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Custodian 2-26-04 HALL Custodian 2-24-04 FOREST PARK Clerical 3-9-04 FAIR Instr. Aide 3-8-04 FOREST HGTS. Instr. Aide 2-23-04 MITCHELL SALARY CLASS 3-01 FSH550 1-01 CUS925 1-01 CUS925 44-11 CLK12 1-06 INA925 1-05 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 8130.00 annual 3465.25 prorated 5313.00 annual 1732.50 prorated 5164.50 annual 1740.21 prorated 26256.00 annual 9049.94 prorated 13166.00 annual 3771.88 prorated 12481.00 annual 4790.01 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 March 25, 2004 NAME McIntosh, Felicia Patterson, Gary Peaster, Pearlie Swagerty, Gail POSITION SCHOOL Secretary FEDERAL PROG. Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Child Nutrition BASELINE Child Nutrition FULBRIGHT START DATE END DATE 3-15-04 2-2-04 1-30-04 2-9-04 Non-Certified Promotion SALARY CLASS 49-09 AN12 1-07 INA12 7-01 FSH650 3-01 FSH550 Lucas, Chester Regular Security to District Wide Security Robertson, Andrew Regular Security to School Based Supervisor Non-Certified Transfer NONE ANNUAL SALARY 28716.00 annual 9042.48 prorated 16931.00 annual 7348.77 prorated 9606.00 annual 4146.85 prorated 8130.00 annual 3243.11 prorated .,_ z~ - '= ~ Z::c .~.,,8.. S:\u0026lt;n s:m s:\na \"'~ Cm ID \u0026lt;n ~ f) .., z ~ ~ m ms: z --\n~ \"\u0026gt;' \na -\u0026lt; \u0026gt; c~:: \"--'\ns: zm --\n\"' !\" ~c:: C zm --\n(\"') ~ mz ~ :x, '..1/:l.n Individual Approach to a World ef Knowledge\" March 25, 2004 To: LRSD Board of Directors From: Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by:trieverly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Ratification of Professional egotiated Agreement between the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and the LRSD Board of Directors On Friday, March 12, 2004, all components of the Negotiations were concluded as the Executive Director ofLRCTA and the ChiefNegotiator for the LRSD Board of Directors signed the attached tentative agreement. Several other articles were also signed off on with regard to language. I will be glad to answer any questions with regard to negotiations at the special board meeting. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !'\" ~ C C m z --\u0026lt; n ,\u0026gt;... mz ~\n,:, Tentative Agreement Signed with LRCTA and the Board on 3-12-04 1) Salary: a. 2.875% for the 2003-04 school year retroactive to the first of the contract. b. 10% for the 2004-05 school year c. There is no guarantee in this package that additional funds allocated to LRSD because of Act 59 and/or changes in the Lakeview Court Settlement will be added to the teacher salary schedule. 2) Article 10: a) Insurance: 1. $253 for the 2003-04 school year for the remaining pay periods in the year. 2. Up to $260 for the 2004-05 school year. 3. Employees currently receiving the $550 in lieu :\u0026gt;fhealth insurance will not receive the stipend for the 2004-05 school year. They will be given an opportunity to enroll in a health insurance program during open enrollment in the fall. 3) Attendance Incentive: (professional leave and personal leave days are not part of this agreement.) Employees on sabbatical leave, educational leave, leave without pay or taken off payroll for any reason do not qualify for the perfect attendance bonus money outlined in the package proposal ($300, $300, $700). l. Employees who use none of their sick leave days during the first semester will receive a $300 stipend at the end of that semester. 2. Employees who use none of their sick days during the second semester will receive a $300 stipend at the end of that semester. 3. Employees who use none of their sick days during the entire school year will receive an additional perfect attendance stipend of $700. (Total of$1300 for one year of perfect attendance.) 4) Effective for the 2004-05 school year, teachers awarded National Board Certification will receive an annual stipend of$3000. 5) The language tentatively agreed to on March 12, 2004, on Articles 4, 6, 9 and 21 must be agreed to. 6) Two workdays and two record days will be used for staff development. Two record days will be  day in length. 7) Current Contract Language will be used with regard to period pay. ~n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" March 25, 2004 To: LRSD Board of Directors From: Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by:~everly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Salary Adjustments for all other Employee Groups for 2003-04 The Administration is making the following recommendations for all other employee groups for the 2003-04 school year: A) B) The same salary raise as negotiated for teachers of 2.875% for 2003-04 retroactive to July I, 2003 The same insurance benefit of $253 per month on health insurance for the 2003- 04 school year beginning with the April I, 2004, pay period. C) All employees currently receiving the $550 in lieu of health insurance will not receive the stipend for the 2004-05 school year. They will be given an opportunity to enroll in a health insurance program during open enrollment in the fall. The Administration will be making recommendations with regard to future negotiations and salaries for the 2004-05 school year for all remaining employee groups at a later date. 810 \\'(/ Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001\n,\u0026gt;s \"Cl . m\u0026gt; C) 0 ~~ .z..,i Zen \"tlm \"0'\"~'\ngm en en ~ \u0026gt; ,~.\n.: i !,\n~ Z\n:c .~., 8,- !sI:: men se:n\"\u0026lt;' ,- \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt; -m a:, en ~ !..J,l z ~ C') ,\u0026gt;- en z\u0026gt; z C ~ \u0026gt; C C =l !\" !':l C 0 .zm.. . C') ,\u0026gt;.... zm ~ \"' '54n Individual Approach to a World efKnowledge\" March 25, 2004 To: LRSD Board of Directors From: .  ir. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Prepared by:~everly Williams, Director of Human Resources RE: Calendar for 2004-05 The attached calendar for the 2004-05 school year is recommended for your approval. I will be glad to answer any questions regarding the calendar at the special board meeting. 810 W farkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 .!%.,1 z ~ n ,\u0026gt;.... en \u0026gt;z z C: ,\u0026gt;.... ~ C :::. MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY '05 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE Legend M T 2 3 I 2 3 4 I I 2 3 * [] WV LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT CALENDAR 2004-2005 w TH F M T w TH F M T w I 2 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 SD SD SD SD SD WD 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 H I 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 SD 1 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 SD SD 3 4 5 8 9 10 II 12 15 16 17 I 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 [87] -R H 5 6 7 10 II 12 13 14 17 18 19 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 II 14 15 16 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 II 14 15 16 sv I 4 5 6 7 8 II 12 13 4 5 6 9 10 II 12 13 16 17 18 [1781 # R I 2 3 T 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 1st Day Students H Holiday End Quarter SD Staff Development TH 15 1*9 16 14 18 16 20 17 17 14 19 16 Winter Vacation R Reoord Days (one-half day) F M 16 19 20 23 17 20 15 18 19 22 WV 17 20 21 24 PC 18 21 18 21 15 18 20 23 17 20 sv Spring Vacation TCD Total Contract Days (9.25 teachers) PC Parent Conference WD Non-student Work Day ST DA' Student Days # Last Day Students T w 20 21 24 25 21 22 19 20 H 23 24 WV WV 21 22 25 26 22 23 22 23 19 20 24 25 21 22 For Board Approval # 2 ST TH F M T w TH F DAY :-, I) TCD 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 26 27 30 31 9 0 I 5 15 PC 23 24 27 28 29 30 20 1 1 0 21 [43] SD 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 19 0 0 2 21 H H 25 26 29 30 17 3 0 2 19 WV H WV WV WV WV WV 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 13 10 0 0 13 27 28 31 19 I 0.5 0 19.5 24 25 28 19 0 I 0 20 [134] SD sv sv sv SV 24 25 28 29 30 31 18 4 0 I 19 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 20 I 0 0 20 H 26 27 30 31 21 I 0 0 21 23 24 27 28 29 30 3 0 0.5 0 3.5 TOTALS 178 21 4 10 192 STUDENTS DO NOT ATTEND ON THE DAYS SHADED ABOVE I 1st Quarter = 43 student days 2nd Quarter = 44 student days 3rd Quarter = 4 7 student days 4th Quarter= 44 student days TOTAL = 178 STUDENT DAYS Student Galendar2004-05 4th Oran 3/22/2004 Date: To: From: Prepared By: Subject: Summary: Objectives: Population: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS March 25, 2004 Board of Education Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Margo Bushmiaer, Coordinator of Health Services \u0026amp; Chair of District Coordinated School Health Committee Mary Paal, Director of Safe Schools/Healthy Students Grant Annette Scogin, Assistant Director of Athletics Submission of 2004 Carol M. White Physical Education Program Proposal The U. S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, has published the draft guidelines for the 2004 application for grants under the Carol M. White Physical Education Program (PEP). We are currently in the process of preparing for submission of a Physical Education Program proposal and seek Board support and approval. The focus of this grant will be to expand and improve the physical education program in Little Rock School District elementary schools by: 1. hiring a Coordinator of Elementary Physical Education to assure implementation of the Arkansas Department of Education Physical Education Standards. 2. providing equipment to enable students to participate actively in physical education activities\nand 3. provide staff and teacher training and education in order to make progress toward meeting State Standards for physical education. 4. implement the \"Nifty Nutrition Education\" program with elementary students. All students and staff in Elementary Schools. Duration: Three-year period: July 2004 - June 2007 Projected Request: $ 627,000.00 over the three-year period .?.,l z \u0026gt;z C')\n,\n\nVI \u0026gt;z z C: ,\u0026gt;- ~ C =I March 25, 2004 Page2 Other Agencies: Arkansas Parks and Recreation Extension Services of Arkansas University of Arkansas at Little Rock University of Central Arkansas Recommendations: We recommend approval for submission of the 2004 PEP proposal\nprovide support by adoption of the PEP resolution Attachments: None TO: FROM: SUBJECT: '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" March 25, 2004 Board of Directors Morris L Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent aming of Facilities - Mabelvale Magnet Middle School The faculty, staff, parents, and students of Mabelvale Magnet Middle School have submitted a request to name the library in honor of Mr. Carl Martin, a lifetime resident of Mabelvale who serves as the local historian for Mabelvale students. The request and supporting documents are submitted in accordance with Policy FF: aming of Facilities. The administration recommends approval. 810 \\'C l\\Iarkham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 .!J.,l z \u0026gt;z 0 ,\u0026gt;- \"' \u0026gt;z z C: \u0026gt;,- ~ C =I Adopted: May 27, 1999 Cross Reference: Naming and Renaming Facilities Form NAMING AND RENAMING FACILITIES Mabe/vale Magnet Middle School I propose that the 10811 Mabe/vale West Roa~ Mabe/vale/ AR 72103 be named the \"Carl Martin Librarv// I. Biographical Data: Carl Martin, a lifetime resident of Mabelvale, has served as the local historian for Mabelvale students. His great-grandparents settled this area in 1826 when they bought 1,300 acres of land. (See attached Biographical Data) II. The Nominee's significant contribution is his donation of \"local history\" to Mabelvale students. As a 93-year member of this community, Mr. Martin is well-known and very respected by the people of the community. He loves our students and enjoys sharing his \"stories\" with them. He has worked for many years to preserve the history of the Little Rock area. He plans to donate two columns from the old Little Rock Carnegie Library to our school. (See attached Significant Contribution) 111. I believe the facility should be named for this person because of the Martin families ties to the community and to the school. Carl Martin has spent a lifetime dedicated to the preservation of the history of the \"Mabelvale Community\". (Date) This form should be submitted by persons nominating names for new facilities to the LRSD Board of Education for consideration according to Board policy FF. 4 Background History on \"The Martin Projecr' During the 2001-2002 school year, our Builders Club met to discuss various service projects for our club. At this same time, Ms. Kathey Farley was looking for a project for the East Lab to research. Locating and recording data from an area cemetery was a project that intrigued Ms. Farley. After brainstorming with many teachers, Ms. Farley contacted Joyce Swinney, a teacher and longtime area resident, who told her about Mr. Clif Morehart, the caretaker of the Martin Cemetery. As Mr. Morehart visited our school to tutor reading students for Ms. Beckie Jones's English classes, we were able to visit with him frequently about Mabelvale's history. Ms. Farley asked Mr. Morehart to speak to her East Lab classes about the cemetery and the community. We shared information with Ms. Farley about a research project on Mabelvale that we had completed with some classes several years ago. As Ms. Pam Wallace and I worked on an Arkansas Heritage \"Living History\" grant, the pieces started falling into place. We decided to work with Ms. Farley's East Classes on a special project to interview Mr. Carl Martin, whose family had lived in this area for over 150 years. Ms. Farley's East Lab students and the Builders Club students could work on a living history project. However, the project was \"too large\" for our time constraints. Even though we didn't get the Arkansas Heritage grant, Ms. Wallace and I felt that the \"living history\" project was important. Mrs. Farley's East students took pictures and started transcribing the interviews. Throughout the year, we visited Mr. Martin, got to know his wife, Lorene, and fell in love with both of them. Our students were amazing-they were so interested in learning about Mr. Martin's rooster, the Little Rock City Jail keys, and the Andrew Carnegie columns. We learned about the town of Mabelvale, and even about the red clay that the school is built on. It didn't matter what topic we asked about, Mr. Martin had an answer. He was versed on everything. He loved our kids, and they felt it. After each visit, he always hugged them as if he had known :tiem forever. Some of our sixth graders visited Mr. Martin, and the next year they started asking us if they could go back to see him. On September 25, 2003, representatives of the Builder's Club presented a plaque to Mr. Martin to thank him for his years of service to Mabelvale schools. When we gave him the plaque, he was very touched. We were also very touched and amazed at what an impression this project has had on our students. After spending the past three school years on this project, we knew that it was only fitting to honor our local historian with a unique gift since our school sits in the middle of the Martin\" homestead. The community of Mabelvale has a \"rich heritage\" and closeness. To honor the Martin Family and this community, we are requesting permission to name the Mabe/vale Magnet Middle School Library the \"Carl Martin Library\". When the new library is finished, we plan to have an Open House to dedicate the facility as the Carl Martin Library. We will have a portrait of Mr. Martin to display in an area of the library with other items collected from the community. Mr. Martin has agreed to donate two columns from the old Carnegie Library to our school. We plan to have a plaque placed on them to tell of their historical significance to the state. We will invite the community to the Open House and dedication of the Library. We will ask our Partners-In-Education to assist us with the celebration. .!%.,' z ~ 0 ,\u0026gt;- ,e,n. zz ,C,.: ,- ~ C =I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: March 25, 2004 Board of Education FROM: ~Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: Schoo I/Department Booker Arts Magnet Elementary School J.A. Fair Magnet High School Forest Park Elementary School Forest Park Elementary School Forest Park Elementary School Item G.E refrigerator, valued at $200.00, for use in the teacher's lounge 156 backboards, valued at $1,000.00, for use by students in all-school science fair Mr. Jeffrey Carson Mr. David Rainey of SmurfitStone Container Corporation New iron fencing at east, Forest Park PT A north and part of the west playground perimeters valued at $19,850.00 Stonework surrounding Forest Park PT A both play equipment areas at east and west sides valued at $17,867.00 Multipondo play Forest Park PT A equipment and installation valued at $2,798.35 !.X.,I z \u0026gt; ~ ,\u0026gt;.... \"' \u0026gt;z z C: -,:. \u0026gt; C: C =i Board of Education March 25, 2004 Page2 School/Department Gibbs Elementary Magnet School Jefferson Elementary School Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School Rightsell Academy Item Donor $2,500.00 check to be Ms. Susan M. Wixon applied toward the installation of a sprinkler system Six (6) DVD players Jefferson PTA and one (1) DVDNCR combo player. The estimated value of all donated items is $775.00. Four (4) iMac computers Mr. Patrick R. Carrington w/separate components, four (4) Epson color printers and miscellaneous computer supplies to Parkview's Journalism Department. The total value of all donated items is $3,035 .00. 15 Dell P2/300 computers Acxiom Corporation w/separate components. The estimated value of all donated items is $1,000.00. It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. To: From: Subject: Date: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Cheryl A. Carson, Principal, Booker Arts Magnet School Donation of Property March 2, 2004 Jeffrey Carson wishes to donate a G.E. refrigerator, model number TBX18TAZGRWH, for use in the Teacher's Lounge at Booker Arts Magnet School. The refrigerator is valued at $200.00. Mr. Carson's address is 4115 Ridge Road, North Little Rock, AR, 72116. I respectfully request that this donation be accepted in accordance with Little Rock School District policy. .!.I,I z ~ n \u0026gt; ~ \u0026gt;z z C .\u0026gt;.... \u0026gt; C C ::::\nTO: FROM: DATE: RE: J. A. Fair Magnet High School Science \u0026amp; Technology Systems 13420 David O. Dodd Roaa Little Rock, Arkansas 72210 Telephone (501) 447-1700 Fax (501) 447-1701 Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement e:\\\\_,. Cassandra Norman, Principal February 5, 2004 Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Davin Rainey, Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., P. 0 . Box 4790, Little Rock, Arkansas 72214, has generously donated 156 backboards with a value of $1 ,000 for use by our students in our all school science fair. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. A School of the Little Rock School District TO: \u0026lt;'1rf ,FROM: vv-DATE: RE: Darral Paradis, Director Theresa Ketcher, Principal of Forest Park School February 5, 2004 Donations These donations have been made to Forest Park School. See attachment It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. /pl .!J.,I z ~ n \u0026gt; ~ \u0026gt;z z C ,\u0026gt;- \u0026gt; C C =l December 1, 2003 Theresa Ketcher, Principal Forest Park Elementary 16 N. Tyler Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Mrs. Ketcher, The Forest Park PT A is pleased to list the following items donated for playground improvements during the 2002-2003 school year: New iron fencing at east, north and part of the west playground perimeters valued at $19,850.00. Stonework surrounding both play equipment areas at east and west sides, $17,867.00. Multipondo play equipment and installation, $2798.35. The precast caps installed on the stonework surrounds were donated by Arkansas Precast and are valued at $22,000.00. (This donation was approved in the Feb. 2003 Board meeting.) Forest Park continues to provide a great learning environment and we appreciate the opportunity to contribute to our school in this way. Sincerely, / /21,\n// t\n.~ /\nV ----- e.. l ('0f/, '\" L Ellen Yearyl,Past Prtsident, PT A (2002-2003) GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: I \\ T E 12 \\ .\\ T I O \\ .\\ I. HDI [6 Mr. Darrall Paradis, Director of Procurement Jfl'Felicia Hobbs, Principal February 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Donation Ms Susan M. Wixon very graciously donated a check in the amount of$2,500.00 to Gibbs Magnet School. The donation goes toward the installation of a sprinkler system here at Gibbs. We sincerely appreciate this donation. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. FH:kt ' .. 11 15 West 1 6'\" Street Phone 447-4900  Little Rock . Arkansas 72202 /.~ /'' ,~1'.\\,  ,.,, \\ JEFFERSON E LEMENTARY SCHOOL February 27, 2004 To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement and Materials Management From: f.f Roberta Mannon, Principal Jefferson Elementary School Subject: Donation The following donation has been made to Jefferson Elementary School: Six DVD players and one DVDNCR combo player - total value approximately $775.00. The Jefferson PTA donated these items. Mailing address for the PTA is Jefferson School. It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with LRSD Board policies. 2600 N. McKinley Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 - Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2501 BARROW ROAD Date: To: From: Subject: PHONE 228-3000 February 10, 2004 Darral Paradis, Director LRSD Procurement Department Dr. Linda Brown, Principal '/fr Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School Computer Equipment Donation Ll'ITLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72204 Mr. Patrick R. Carrington recently donated several items of computer equipment to Parkview' s Journalism Department. Please reference the attached list. We, at Parkview, would like to say a very hearty Thank You to Mr.Carrigan! Your support is appreciated more than we can express. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .. ,!l,:l z \u0026gt;z 0 ,... u,\n:\nzz C: ,\u0026gt;... \u0026gt; C: C =l DONATION(S) TO PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL Judith Murray Class: Journalism _________ _ January 22, 2004 from Patrick R. Carrington/ 26 Talais Drive/ LR/ Ar./ 72223 501.821.0114 MacOvation, Inc. 1 . ) iMac ( completely functional) (iMac A) Revision A-233 mHz / Serial # XA8464N5EUL / RAM 128 MB 4 GB HD/ Video Mem 6MB / Backside L2 cache 512K internal modem v.90 56K MacOS10.3.2 (Panther) / MacOS9.2.2 Microsoft Office for MacOS9 AND MacOSX (Word, Powerpoint, Excel) Wordperfect (MacOS9) by Corel MaclinkPlusDeluxe VALUE: $550 2.) Plastic riser platform for iMac: Revision A VALUE: $ 35 3.) Computer Skins: iMac \u0026amp; Keyboard Designer Covers X3 VALUE: $12 X 5 = $60 4.) iMac (ethernet disabled by lightening strike) (iMac B) Revision C-350 mHz / Serial # YMO35ASV-JWQ-ff09 / RAM 640 MB 7 GB HD/ Video Mem 6MB / Backside L2 cache 512K internal modem v.90 56K MacOS10.3.2 (Panther) / MacOS9.2.2 Microsoft Office for MacOS9 AND MacOSX (Word, Powerpoint, Excel) Wordperfect (MacOS9) by Corel I MaclinkPlusDeluxe Stuffit Expander 8.0.2 VALUE: $650 5.) Epson Color 740i Printer Serial # BUY1389723 Includes USB cable \u0026amp; printer cartridges VALUE: $120 6.) iMac (completely functional) (iMac C) Revision C-350 mHz / Serial # YM0320Z9JWQ / RAM 640 MB 7 GB HD/ Video Mem 6MB / Backside L2 cache 512K internal modem v.90 56K MacOS10.3.2 (Panther) / MacOS9.2.2 Microsoft Office for MacOS9 AND MacOSX 0fvord, Powerpoint, Excel) Wordperfect (MacOS9) by Corel MaclinkPlusDeluxe VALUE: $650 7.) Epson Black Printer Cartridge for Epson 7 40 S020189 VALUE: $25 8.) Epson Color Photo 850 Printer w/ new black ink cartridge. Serial# AZN1123175 Model P930-A VALUE: $150 9.) Epson Color Stylus 820 Printer Serial# EKEK038614 Model P330-A VALUE: $125 1 O.) Epson 740i Stylus Color Printer Serial# BUY1137914 VALUE: $120 11.) iMac (completely functional) (iMac D) Revision A-233 mHz /Serial# XA834FJUDFN / RAM 288 MB 4 GB HD/ Video Mem 6MB / Backside L2 cache 512K internal modem v.90 56K MacOS10.3.2 (Panther) / MacOS9.2.2 Microsoft Office for MacOS9 AND MacOSX (Word, Powerpoint, Excel) Wordperfect (MacOS9) by Corel MaclinkPlusDeluxe VALUE: $550 Total Value of Donation: $3,035.00 !..II, z ~ C'l \u0026gt; ~ \u0026gt;z z C \u0026gt;,.... \u0026gt; C 0 =I TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Eunice M. Thrasher, Principal  i Rightsell Academy February 17, 2004 Donation The donor listed below has generously donated 15-P2-300 Dell workstations and 15 \"13\" monitors. The estimated value is $1000.00. Acxiom 301 Industrial Blvd Conway, AR 72032 Contact Person: Jerry Adams (501) 342-2480 It is recommended that this donation be approved with thanks in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you for you consideration. Date: To: From: Through: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS March 25, 2004 Board of Education Mark Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services Don Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Ed. D. Interim Superintendent Annual Audit Report You have received under separate cover a copy of the annual audit of the District's financial condition as prepared by Thomas \u0026amp; Thomas, Certified Public Accountants. As required by Arkansas law, the board must take action to approve the audit prior to submission to the state. The administration recommends approval of the audit at this time. bjg Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fu: (501) 447-1158 DATE: March 25, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY,Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes  Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending February 29, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District NI A  Needed Staff NI A  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the February 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. -- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2003 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004 -- APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 02/28/03 COLLECTED 2003/04 02/29/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57 ,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681 ,497 96.76% ~DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 8,432,483 105.41% 10,100,000 10,264,896 101 .63% 4 0% PULLBACK 29,400,000 29,600,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 205,072 109.66% 210,000 ~DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 235,596 69.29% 380,000 239,896 63.13% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 119,016 43.28% 200,000 106,666 53.33% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 175,342 109.59% 240,000 178,086 74.20% TOTAL 97,432,000 66,827,036 68.59% 98,607,800 66,6TT,103 67.62% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 17,215 71 .73% 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 17,215 71.73% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE - STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 35,239,580 64.23% 53,226,139 34,286,616 64.42% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 4,566,701 60.17% 8,300,000 4,048,584 48.78% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 833,381 62.19% 1,400,000 828,403 59.17% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 757,851 44.58% 1,675,000 821,175 49.03% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 205,407 75.14% 273,358 202,301 74.01% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 2,453,084 66.57% 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 1,804,317 55.26% 3,900,000 1,842,110 47.23% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 377,991 37.57% 920,337 403,283 43.82% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 267,486 47.72% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 285,245 100.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 64,573 9.93% 360,000 236,541 65.71% TOTAL 75,441,106 47,246,763 62.63% 74,776,187 44,465,585 59.46% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 175,922 15.62% 1,350,000 135,093 10.01% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 554,813 33.33% 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% TOTAL 3,410,671 730,735 21.42% 3,752,430 679,236 18.10% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 114,821,750 65.13% 177,157,418 111,833,518 63.13% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,152,981 10,731 ,261 42.66% 24,075,790 12,036,503 49.99% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,082,476 52.32% 4,000,000 2,427,292 60.68% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 10,408,214 41 .52% 24,689,351 10,464,842 42.39% TOTAL 54,198,923 23,221,951 42.85% 52,765,141 24,928,637 47.24% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 138,043,700 59.89% 229,922,559 136,762,155 59.48% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2003 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2002/03 02/28/03 EXPENDED 2003/04 02/29/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,865,586 59,903,522 59.39% 100,684,982 55,047,173 54.67% BENEFITS 24,838,361 15,085,593 60.74% 26,483,772 14,377,965 54.29% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 11,960,581 60.42% 19,719,297 11,745,812 59.57% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 4,756,586 56.98% 8,185,459 5,873,557 71 .76% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 860,152 53.19% 1,575,580 707,894 44.93% OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 2,918,81 1 34.30% 8,384,567 2,982,417 35.57% DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,213,572 99.97% 12,098,342 12,191,763 100.77% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176,189,538 107,698,817 61.13% 177,131,999 102,926,581 58.11% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,1 48,726 10,208,019 39.04% 26,056,193 10,284,905 39.47% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 1,976,084 49.65% 4,000,000 2,563,705 64.09% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 13,302,996 53.07% 24,689,351 12,438,947 50.38% TOTAL 55,194,668 25,487,100 46.18% 54,745,544 25,287,557 46.19% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 133,185,917 57.56% 231,877,543 128,214,138 55.29% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 4,857,782 (1,954,984) 8,548,016 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; DED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 (619,709) 1,578,177 3,199,660 OPERATING 8,675,891 15,680,583 9,052,274 17,933,792 TOTAL 9,325,586 15,060,875 10,630,451 21,133,452 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2004 pROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 02-29-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 33,282.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501 .92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,501.92 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 68,753.26 51,049.11 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 246,791 .00 10,880,842.34 6,516,266.11 1,464,227.95 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 7,963.49 25,000.00 9,310.48 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 7,679.00 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 2,108,630.36 2,381,883.52 408,932.43 2,086,394.22 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 166,300.00 13,032,781 .41 8,695,556.31 9,744,468.87 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 949,213.61 59.53 1,385,746.10 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 2,608,721.36 27,329,116.63 15,645,814.38 14,763,387.29 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (2,608,721.36} 19,465,877.87 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 917,779.02 8,206,555.91 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 918,779.02 (2,608,721.36} 0.00 0.00 29,417,139.77 GRAND TOTAL  ~~z laa ~z ~la zz~ a2 ~ ~z a~~ mi a l:i ~:i aa aa ~m 11~a~a PROJECT ALLOCATIONS PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 02-29-04 1 ADMINISTRATION 673,846.55 NEW WORK PROJECTS 35,565,851 .80 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 13,342,240.87 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51 ,655,707.04 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 11 ,735,611 .78 UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 20,759,698.84 I TOTAL I 138,882,176.18\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2004 EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE I 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 THRU 02-29-04 889,772.32 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 68,753.26 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11 ,671 ,442.11 10,880,842.34 113,930.47 109,609.73 7,963.49 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661.38 I 7,679.oo I 791 ,385.63\n4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,381 ,883.52 I 397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 13,032,781.41 I 575,016.53 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 949,213.61 I 5,852,669.42 I 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 27,329,116.63 I I ENDING ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION THRU 02-29-04 SUBTOTAL 02-29-04 0.00 622,797.44 51 ,049.11 6,516,266.11 34,101 ,623.85 1,464,227.95 25,000.00 256,503.69 9,310.48 0.00 4,861 ,214.57 22,190.56 408,932.43 : 11 ,255,846.65 2,086,394.22 8,695,556.31 41 ,911 ,238.17 9,744,468.87 59.53 10,349,865.68 1,385,746. 10 20,759,698.84 I 15,645,814.38 I 103,359,090.05 I 35,523,086.13 Mnorov Ix , s~~l~l/3H x S)fH\\IW3M ~NISOl:\u0026gt; 'XI Fund Operating Operating Operating Operating Total Food Service Activity Fund Total Bond Account Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Total Deseg Plan Scholarship Total Rockefeller Scholarship Total Risk Management Loss Fund I ' Purchase ' Date 02-26-04 ' 01-15-04 ' 02-13-04 ' I 12-19-03 I 02-19-04 I 02-17-04 I I I 09-08-03 01-16-04 01-16-04 01-30-04 11-18-03 05-15-03 01-16-04 05-15-03 12-01-03 09-15-03 02-23-04 12-05-03 01-15-04 02-17-04 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT I SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2004 I I I Maturity l I Institution I interest Rate j Type Principal I I I Date ' I I TFN Bank of America ' 0.810% Repo I 5,585,000.00 I 03-15-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,004 ,986.08 I ' ' 03-15-04 Twin City Bank l 1.350% CD 5,010,334.44 I 03-01-04 Twin City Bank 1.400% CD I 9,600,000.00 I 25,200,320.52 I I I I TFN Bank of America 0.720% Repo 945,000.00 I I I I I 945,000.00 I TFN I Bank of America I 0.780% Repo I 1,200,000.00 I I I I I 1,200,000.00 i I ' 03-08-04 I Regions I 1.094% CD I 400,000.00 I 07-14-04 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 I I 07-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 5,231,393.21 01-31-05 ' Bancorp South 1.850% CD I I I 2,100,244.72 04-15-04 I Bank of the Ozarks I 1.300% I CD I 6,000,000.00 08-16-04 USBANK 1.420% I CD 11,000,000.00 06-10-04 Bank of America I 0.910% I Treasury Bills 5,365,126.36 05-14-04 I Bank of the Ozarks 1.360% CD I 9,000,000.00 05-03-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD I 3,060,648.33 03-15-04 ' Bank of the Ozarks 1.430% CD 10,221,001.82 TFN Bank of America 0.810% Repo I 7,000,000.00 I 60,379,348.75 I 06-15-04 Bank of America 1.020% Treasury Bills 668,325.28 I I I 668,325.28 i I I 06-10-04 Bank of America 0.910% I Treasury Bills 252,059.89 I 252,059.89 TFN I Bank of America 0.250% Repo 400,000.00 I ' 400,000.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1091","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1091"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["86 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nI. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL C :=z i:i: w ~ c::, I- \u0026gt; c::::, LLCz\u0026gt; C'-1 =::s ~ -  LL1::z: -~ w \" ~ c::, C\\1 ::~ 0 == ~ co LL.I LU a: ~ w ~ ~ a: (fl LU c:a  ?---1 ~ C) ~ C ~ ~CJ) ~ ~ ~ Q.) ~ ~  \"\".'1 ~ II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS WELCOME 9() S ~ Q.) ~ .... ~ ~ ~ Q.) -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. PUBLIC ED FOUNDATION REPORT  \\ ' ' . \\ \\ \\ \\ I . ' \\ '. \\  . \\ \\ \\' ' . \\ \\ . \\. \\ .. . ., .\u0026lt;.\\\\ \\ .. \\ .. . . D. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS E. LRCTA/F.JOSHUA ~ ~ ~ Q: ~ I le I. 11. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests REGULAR MEETING February 12, 2004 5:30 p.m. 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners in Education - New Partnerships Bale Elementary School - Twin City Bank - Baseline Elementary School - Southwest Produce - Williams Magnet School - AARP-C. Public Education Foundation of Little Rock - John A. Riggs, IV D. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) E. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association F. Joshua lntervenors IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Demonstration Regular Board Meeting February 26, 2004 Page2 V. VI. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Regular Meeting - 01-22-04 Special Meeting - 02-12-04 B. Extension of PN Agreement C. Personnel Changes SCHOOL SERVICES: A. Naming of Facilities: Mann Magnet Middle School Auditorium B. Resolution to 4G: Attendance Rubric C. School Improvement Report: An Overview VII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Land Sale - Forest Heights Middle School B. Lease: Miles Memorial Church C. Resolution Authorizing Refinance/Consolidation of Outstanding Debt D. Construction Budget Revision - Mitchell and Rightsell E. Donations of Property F. Financial Report VIII. CLOSING REMARKS: IX. X. Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions EMPLOYEE HEARINGS ADJOURNMENT I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL U. PROCEDURAL MATTERS WELCOME Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. PARTNERS IN EDUCATION C. PUBLIC ED FOUNDATION REPORT 0. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS E. LRCTA/F.JOSHUA To: From: Through: Subject: Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 February 26, 2004 Board of Education Debbie Milam, Director, ViPS/Partners in Education)~ Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Partners in Education Program: New partnerships The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. We recommend that the Board approve the following partnerships: Bale Elementary School and Twin City Bank-University Branch Baseline Elementary School and Southwest Produce Williams Traditional Magnet School and AARP Partnership Proposal Twin City Bank- University Branch and Bale Elementary School Twin City Bank- University Branch commits to the following partnership activities:  Sponsor Red Ribbon Week  Count change collected through fundraisers  Arrange for Penny, Nick and Buck to make appearances at school functions  Recruit employees to read to students and listen to students read  Job shadowing  Provide speakers for topics such as economics, saving money, etc.  Provide refreshments for staff functions Bale Elementary commits to the following partnership activities:  Provide artwork for display in bank lobby  Provide choir to perform on holidays and special occasions-grand opening  Acknowledged Twin City Bank - University Branch as a Partner in Education  Invite the bank to school events  Work with the bank on community service projects BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Partnership Agreement between Baseline Elementary and Soutwest Produce Southwest Produce is willing to: Make food/ice donations for special events Make food donations to help needy families, if needed Sponsor one or more students for Job Shadowing Kay Moore will mentor a female student and will visit with said student at least once a month at Baseline Be willing for students to make a fieldtrip to the store in the line of academic study or career education Participate in our annual community service project by donating or getting food items at cost Display student work in the business Baseline Elementary is willing to: Provide a calendar of events and invite employees to appropriate school functions Provide appropriate tokens of appreciation for partnership Help with a special project, such as a clean-up day or other 3623 Baseline Road  Phone (501) 447-3700  Fax (501) 447-3701 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 !\" \u0026gt; C: C ~ ::0 en fll c3 ~ WILLIAMS TRADITIONAL MAGNET SCHOOL A CHOICE FOR EXCELLENCE AARP Arkansas and Williams Traditional Magnet School Partnership Establishment The AARP Foundation leads positive social change to help people 50 and over age with independence, dignity and purpose. The Arkansas State Office and Information Center are both located in Little Rock. All AARP chapters are non-government, non-partisan, non-profit community service organizations that are open to all local AARP members. The AARP offers many programs, services, and many other subjects of interest to their members and their families. There are numerous employees who have a wide range of interests, talents, experiences, and ideas, and possibly will be willing to share these for the benefit of students at Williams Magnet School. Williams Traditional Magnet School is a tri-district magnet school operating in Pulaski County as a part of the LR.SD. There is a staff of approximately 40 and a student enrollment of approximately 460. Despite all of the help afforded by the three school districts whose children attend, the school is always in need of additional resources in connection with the education provided to students. The staff at Williams Magnet School completed a school needs assessment to determine needed services and resources for the 2003-04 school year. The Partnership Council will use this information to match resources and needs throughout the school year. Activities will be coordinated through the AARP team leader and the Williams Magnet School team leader. The Partnership Council will attend an initial conference, and will then meet as the need arises to assess the effectiveness of the Partnership. Communication will be open and constant. *Proposed plan of activities for the 2003-04 school year: AARP Grandparent's Day Activities Student incentives/awards for Grandparent's Day Grandparent seminars/classes Provide educational resources Assembly guests 7301 E:vergreen Street  Phone (501) 447-7100 Williams Magnet School Student/Teacher participation in AARP programs Promote ongoing recognition and appreciation Send monthly newsletters Art work Participate in contests Choir performance Fax (501) 447-7101  Little Rock , Arl\u0026lt;ansas 72207 '.54.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" DATE: TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: February 26, 2004 Board of Directors ~nald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Bill Goodman~ February 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects The remodeling of Central High School is being performed in construction phases. Portable classrooms have permitted construction to be done during normal working hours in the areas of the building that are vacated by staff and students. This method and the cooperation of Central' s staff have allowed the contractor to accelerate the construction schedule. The completion date has been changed to the summer of 2005 as opposed to the original completion date of December 2005. All of the portable classrooms at Mann Magnet Middle School were sold at a public auction earlier this month. All of the portable classrooms will be removed by the end of this month. This will allow the contractor to build the new parking lot north of the replacement school. All construction will be completed by May 1st . The above is all good news. The bad news is that the construction of the new media center at Dunbar Magnet Middle School has had several unexpected delays. Instead of being ready for occupancy this summer, it will be completed in December 2004. If you have any questions, please call me at 447-1146. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.1rsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 rn  c:: C ~ 6l ~ ~ .'..\". mn ::c C ~ z ~ ! \u0026lt;z5 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Baseline Renovation $953,520 Jul-O4 Brady Addition/renovation $973,621 Aug_:Qi Central Renovation  Interior $10,200,266 Aug-O5 Dunbar Renovation/addition $6,161 ,950 Dec-O4 J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 May-O4 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851,621 Mar-O4 Mann Partial Replacement $11 ,500,000 May-O4 McClellan Classroom Addition $2,155,622 Jul-O4 Parkview Addition $2,121 ,226 Jun-O4 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation $1 ,193,259 . Aug-O4 Pulaski Hgts. MS Renovation $3,755,041 Aug-O4 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Aug-O4 Tech Ctr I Metro Renovation 'Addition/Renovation Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-O4 Wakefield Rebuild $5,300,000 Jul-O4 Williams Renovation $2,106,492 Mar-O4 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2004 Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I tst. Completion Date Mitchell Renovation $750,000 I Aug-O5 Rightsell I Renovation $660,000 Aug-O6 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. completion Date Booke-r --- Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown --Roof-- --- ----- -Boo-ker -- $48,525 I Unknown ADA Rest rooms -- Booker TBD Unknown Carver Media Center Expansion Unknown Unknown Chicot -- Electrical Upgrade Unknown Unknown Chicot Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm $50,783 Un-known Cloverdale Elementary Addition Unknown Unknown Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown Fair Park 1Additior, Unknown I Unknown Forest Heights _ !Remodel $1,400,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown 1 Unknown Geyer Springs Roof Repair $161 ,752 . Unknown Gibbs - Addition Unknown Unknown - --- Henderson Lockers $80,876 Unknown -- -Mab-levale- -- Fire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown McD-ermot-t --Fire Alarm Upgrade TB~ Unknown Meadowcliff --- Addition Unknown  Unknown -- --- Pulask_!_!igts. MS_ - - ~ rgy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Washington Fire Alarm Upgrade -- T~ Unknown --- Western Hills Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 Unknown -- Western Hills _ __ire Alarm Upgrade TBD Unknown - - Western Hills ADA Rest rooms TBD Unknown Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badg._ett ______ _ Badgett Bale Project Description Asbestos abatement Fresh airs stem Fire alarm Energy monitoring system installation Energy monitoring system installation Energy efficient lighting Partial asbestos abatement Fire alarm Classroom addition/renovation E nergy monitoring system Partial roof replacement HVAC Bale Bale Bale Booker --------'- ------- Booker Energy efficient lighting . Energy monitoring system installation Booker A sbestos abatement Booker Brady Brady Carver -------- -- -- Fire alarm  Energy efficient lighting --------Asbestos abatement - -- ------ Carver ----- Central Parking Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central/Quigley Central Central Central Central Central Cloverdale Elem. Cloverdale MS Cloverdale MS Dodd Dodd Dodd Facilities Service Facility Services Fair Park- -- - Fair Park Fair Park J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair J. A. Fair Forest Park Forest Park Forest Park __ _ fulbright Fulbright Fulbright --===-Fulbright Fulbrigh.!_ __ _ Franklin Gibbs GibbS - - - - - - Energy monitoring system installation Parking lot S tudent parking Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair A thletic Field lmprovemen-t - Irrigation System P urchase land for school Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations -Ceiling and wall repair -Fire Alarm System De- s-ig-n-/1-ns- tallation -,-FroniTanding tile repair - Energy efficient lighting  Energy efficient lighting _ Major renovation \u0026amp; addition Energy efficient lighting - Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile ~ Replace roof top HVAC J nterior renovation Fire alarm . HVAC renovation/fire alarm ~Energy efficient lighting Asbestos abatement-ceiling _Energy efficient lighting Press box Security cameras Athletic Field Improvement I rrigation System Roof repair_s __ _ Replace window units w\"lcentral HVAC Diagonal parking __ _ 1Energy efficient lighting Energyefficient lighting 7EnergyITlonitorfi,g._s_y~st\"- e-m_i_n-stallation - Re lace roof top HVAC units Parking lot ______ _ Roof repairs R enovation Energy efficient lig,h_tin~g,__ _ Energ monitoring s stem installation --~$=3-8:..0::.!,.4.:.c9::..5:c,-___M ar-03 $55,000 Aug-03 $32,350 ~g-03 May-02 ~ t-01 Dec-01 $15,160 $82,000 $237,237 $18,250 $2,244,524 - Jul-01 $269,587 ---.-. --$664,587- -=----$170,295 $23,710 -- $10,900 $34,501 ----$80,5~ + $345,072 - - $14,4~ .._ - $111~742 $174,000 $265,000 $38,000 $1~ 500 Unknown $2,000,000 .,_ $24,000 $80,876- $22,470 - $132,678 $189,743 $1 ,393,822 $90,665~ $156,299- $215:570 $84,672 $12,00~ $315,956 $90,162~ $59,310 $277,594 $10,784 - $12,500 $38,000- $14,000 $391 ,871 $485,258 ~ 11 ,7~ --- ~ 788- $134.463 $11,950 $107,835 $140,000 - $200,000 $2,511 ,7~ - $76,447- $11 ,770 Aug-02 Dec-02 Mar-02 Dec-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Sep-02 Aug-02 May-01 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Aug-03 Dec-02 Dec-02 Oct-01 Aug-01 Aug-01 Jul-01 Jul-01 Nov-02 Aug-01 Jul-01 Aug-02 Mar-01 Aug-03 Apr-02 Aug-01 Aug-01 Apr-01 Nov-00 Jun-01 Jul-03 Jul-03 Aug-03 Nov-03 Aug-03 ~y-01 Jun-01 Aug-0_!_ Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Mar-03 Apr-01 Jul-01 2 f\u0026gt; ril ,0 ~ z m rn ::z:: ~ Cl m \"' :n .... ~ ::z:: C m ~ ~ ! 15 z CONSTRUCTIONREPORTTOTHEBOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I I Est. Completion Proiect Description Cost Date Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement I $168,2221 Aug-01 Hall I Energy efficient lighting I $42,931 Jul-01 Hall I Energy efficient lighting I $296,707 Apr-01 Hall Infrastructure improvements I $93,657 Aug-01 Hall Intercom I Feb-01 Hall Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 i--H:-..,..e._n--d-,,e....rs_o_n ______ ,,E,,...n_e,..r..g,.,_y,'-ef_fi1ci_en_t_l~ig_ht~ing'---------'--'---$-'--1-9'-3'..,,6_7_9_ ____J_ u_l-01---1 Henderson Roof replacement gy,~m_ ______, ___$_ 107~,8_35 ____M_ ay~-_0.1,.. Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I $500,000 1 Aug-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase 2 $250,000 Aug-02 IRC IEnergy efficient lighting $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement $43,639 Oct-01 Jefferson Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw Parking lot $269,588 1 Jul-01 Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation $12,150 Aug-01 Mabelvale Elem. 'Replace HVAC units $300,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement $107,000 ' Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Energy efficient lighting --'$-_1.0:..6_,,.5.:..9.:..8\n_\n,_ ___D_ e_c-,..0..-21 Mabelvale MS-------,R- e-n-o'\"v''a-t_e_b_le_a_c_h\"e\"\"r_s_,,___ ________- _ -__$ 1_3_4~,7 _9_3_ ___A_ u~g~-01_, ~ann Asphalt walks 'The total $1_ 8 million If---___D, ,...ec_-c0c1----1 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler repla_c_e_m_e_n_t _______ __, used so far on the l~ ___ O_c_t-01_. Mann Fencing projects listed 1f---___ Se_,p_-01---1 ,-Ma-nn- --- Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000  Jul-03 1 M_c_C_le_lla_n=-~----____ l_rr~ig~a_tio_n_ System $14,750 Jul-03 McClellan Security cameras $36,300 1 Jun-01 _M_c_Cle_lla_n _______ E_n_ergy efficient lighting $303,614 May-01 McClellan Stadium stands repair $~23_5_,,,0....0,...0._ ___- A=cu-=g--:0:-=1-1 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 I_M_c_D_e_rm_ ott _____. ...,,E__n_ergy efficient lighting 1 $79,411 1 Feb-01 McD_erm6tt Replace roof top HVAC units , $476,000 Aug-02 Meadowcliff Fire alarm ! $16,175 1 Jul-01 Meadowcliff ______A_ s_b_e-st_o_s_a-bat_em_e-n-t -------1~---$--2'-5-3-'-\",4--1.2.:.._,__ __A_ u_g_-0--21 Mead_ow_c_liff - ----,-E-n-ge_r_g_y_effi-1c-ie_nt l-ig-h-ti-ng------~,----$-88-',-29_7_ I ----D-e=c--0-21 Metropolit~ I Replace cooling tower i $37,203 ' Dec-00 Metropolitan Replace shop vent system I $20,000 May-01 1 _M_e_tr_o_politan_ ______E_ n_e_r,g=y monitoring system installation ____$_1 7_,,_145_ ____A_ u=g-_0_1, Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 I Apr-01 ~itchell __-_ 'Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Oakhurst Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek Otter Creek- Otter Creek ~~~t~:n~~:::~ent $~!\n:~-~-~----A-Ju~_I:~- ~-\u0026lt; Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 __ _ Energy ~ ff~ient lighting ---=-~_ ____$8_ 1_,,82_8__ Apr-01 - -----A-sb-es=tos- a-ba-te-m-en-t ------------,--$1,0~,000- -----A~ug-0~2 Parking lot $138,029 1 Aug-02 --- - -----~6 c-las-sr-oom- -add-itio-n -----------~$88-8,-778- 1- ---O-ct\u0026lt;-02 Otter Creek , Parking Improvements 1 $142,541 1 Aug-03 Parkview HVAC controls $210,000 I Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 1 Sep-01 Parkview Parkview Exterior lights , $10,784 1 Nov-00 HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 Aug-0'1 Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 , Aug-01 Parkview 1 Energy efficient liohting $315,000 Jun-01 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD FEBRUARY 26, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facilitv Name I Proiect Descriotion I Cost I Est. Completion Date Procurement Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 I Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm I $25,000 Aug-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem I Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 Rightsell I Energy efficient lighting $84,898 I Apr-01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof too HVAC $539,175 I Aug-01 Rockefeller I Parking addition $111,742 I Aug-02 Romine I Asbestos abatement $10,000 . Apr-02 Romine 'Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 Mar-03 SecurityfTransportation Bus cameras $22,500 I Jun-01 Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest INew roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 I Jan-02 Southwest Drainage I street widening I $250,000 I Aug-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 Dec-01 Technology Upgrade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry Energy efficient lighting $73,850 Feb-01 Terry I Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry 1 Media Center addition I $704,932 I Sep-02 Wakefield I Security cameras I $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield Energy efficient lighting $74,776 I Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement I $200,000 Nov-02 Washington 1 Security cameras I $7,900 I Jun-01 Washington I Energy efficient lighting I I $165,281 Apr-01 Watson Energy monitoring system installation I $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson ,Asbestos abatement I $10,000 Aug-02 Watson I Major renovation \u0026amp; addition I $800,000 - Aug-02 Western Hills IAsbestos abatement I $191 ,946 I Aug-02 Western Hills I Intercom I $1,100 I Dec-01 Western Hills 1 Energy efficient lighting $106,000 I Jul-01 Williams Parking expansions $183,717 Dec-03 Williams Energy efficient lighting $122,719 . Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 I Aug-02 4 !I' -a z I ii: m .z.. . r\u0026gt; ril ~ z z m h ::c ~ Cl m en .=..\". m ('\") ::c C m ~ z !!l ! lz5 Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February 26, 2004 To: Board of Directors From~andy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - February This is the fifty-second communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with one high school, two middle schools and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. !II \",zt. i c\n') ::,c, m m ii: m :!:i r, ~ ~ z m h ::c ~ c\n') m CII Audit Report - February 2004 Page 2 of 2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Participating in planning for Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. '54n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" Date: February 26, 2004 To: Board of Education F rorn: ( Beverly Williams, Director ofH uman Resources Through: Morris L. Holmes, Ed.D. Interim Superintendent Re: Agreement regarding extension of the PN contract for all employee groups Attached is an agreement, which was reached on January 27, 2004, between the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association and the District with regard to an extension of the present written negotiated Agreements. On going negotiations will continue. I am requesting the Board approval. 810 W/. Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.org 501-447-1000  fax: 501-447-1001 !\"\u0026gt; -a m ~ z m h ::c ~ C') m en\n,,, :s ~~ !\n::c ~8 o.., ren ..,m \u0026gt;\no n-:nS ~ m en .!.l.l Cl \u0026gt; ,,. :z ~ :z ,C,.: LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION January 27, 2004 AGREEMENT BETWEEN LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION I. The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association agree to extend their written negotiated agreements for the following employee groups: Teachers\nBus Drivers, Aides, and Monitors\nCustodians: Security Officers\nand Paraprofessionals. II. This extension is effective from January 30, 2004 until March 7, 2004 for all Agreements. All provisions and benefits of the contracts will remain in full force and automatically continue. On going negotiations will continue. ~?fit Grainger Ledbetter Chief Negotiator, LRCTA Date: ~/_- --\"-P_,_2----=--!)::.....i'----- 1500 West 4th Street Li ttle Roel~, AR 72201  5011372-3519 1-\\=.A/l'f=.1-. Affiliate DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February 26, 2004 Board of Education Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed-in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. !D Personnel Changes Page 2 February 26, 2004 NAME Igwe, Carrie Reason: Leaving City Forenro, Dan Reason: Retired Purifoy, Jimmy Reason: Deceased Thompson, Peggy Reason: Retired Wamble, Faustine Reason: Retired Andrews, Ashley Beggs, Melinda POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees Spec. Ed 9-2-86 2-17 MABELV ALE EL. 2-4-04 SPE925 Computer Tech 8-19-03 5-20 DUNBAR 5-31-04 TCHlO General Music 11-13-78 6-21 WATSON 12-18-03 TCH925 English 8-27-74 6-21 FAIR 2-13-04 TCH925 Elem IV 8-16-93 5-18 WILLIAMS 1-2-04 TCH925 . New Certified Employees Elem III 2-16-04 1-01 BALE TCH925 English 1-20-04 4-19 CENTRAL TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 43667.00 50788.00 53213.00 53213.00 48267.00 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 25554.23 annual 11845.45 prorated Personnel Changes Page 3 February 26, 2004 NAME Brown, Carleton Cain, Mary Carter, Arre! Charles, Glenroy Dyer, Julie Farrar, Neoma Harder, Melanie POSITION SCHOOL English CENTRAL ElemV GEYER SPRINGS Spec. Ed. ALC Algebra I FAIR Elem IV STEPHENS Elem ill CHICOT Physical Science FAIR START DATE END DATE 1-20-04 1-20-04 2-9-04 1-20-04 1-22-04 2-16-04 1-20-04 SALARY CLASS 4-01 TCH925 1-04 TCH925 1-06 SPE925 6-13 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 2-03 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 30553.00 annual 14162.59 prorated 28588.00 annual 13251.73 prorated 30630.00 annual 11964.84 prorated 44566.00 annual 20658.20 prorated 29609.00 annual 13416.58 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 14447.00 annual 6696.79 prorated\ni m C\nii-!!? ~~ cr(l !~ m u, !II ,... ~ u, m \u0026gt; C) ~ m I:: .mz.. .\n,,:s ~ ~ l!.::r:: ~8 0,... .., u, ..,m ~ ~ -n 3~ m u, .!Z.! Cl ~\nz ,C.: z c-: IT Personnel Changes Page 4 February 26, 2004 NAME Harrison, Kenneth Kuhn, Scarlett Larry,Betty Lockhart, Kelly McDaniel, Yvonne Muhammad, Khaleelah POSITION SCHOOL Geometry HALL Elem III STEPHENS Typing MABELV ALE MID. Algebra PUL. HGTS. MID. Elem III CLOVERDALE EL. Elem IV STEPHENS START DATE END DATE 1-22-04 1-26-04 2-5-04 2-16-04 1-14-04 1-14-04 SALARY CLASS 4-18 TCH925 1-05 TCH925 4-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-02 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 46889.00 annual 21246.53 prorated 29609.00 annual 14033.43 prorated 19095.62 annual 7658.14 prorated 26546.00 annual 9678.23 prorated 26546.00 annual 12719.96 prorated 27056.00 annual 13809.83 prorated Personnel Changes Page 5 February 26, 2004 NAME eumeier, Cynthia Olivares, Lizete Smith, Michelle Treat, Heather Watkins, Cindy Williams, Frank Wise, Marshalette POSITION SCHOOL Elem Il MCDERMOTT Spanish CENTRAL Elem Il MCDERMOT Elem I CHICOT Spanish DUNBAR Music START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 1-6-04 1-5-04 2-2-04 1-14-04 1-20-04 MABELV ALE EL. English 1-12-04 HENDERSON SALARY CLASS 1-07 TCH925 1-03 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-01 TCH925 1-16 TCH925 6-08 TCH925 4-04 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 31651.00 annual 16320.05 prorated 27567.00 annual 14070.66 prorated 26546.00 annual 13687.78 prorated 26546.00 annual 11060.83 prorated 40839.00 annual 19568.69 prorated 39461.00 annual 19524.97 prorated 32595.00 annual 15957.57 prorated ~ a, C:\n\u0026gt; S!? ~~ cgi !~ m (I) !I' ~ (I) m \u0026gt; C, i!ll m :I: .mz. . ~:s ~~ !. :z: ~8 or- -.,u, ..,m \u0026gt;\na !:? ~ m m (I) !.l.l Cl ?\n: z C,. z C': rr Personnel Changes Page 6 February 26, 2004 NAME Hobbs, Anthony NONE POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Certified Promotion Day Coor. ROMINE 1-5-04 Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS ADC105 61-17 Resignationsfferminations Non-Certified Employees Alexander, Deborah Care 8-26-97 CARE Reason: None Given CARE 1-21-04 3-17 Anderson, Leamon Child Nut. 11-13-03 FSH4 Reason: Accepted Another CHILD NUT. 1-30-04 1-01 Position Austin, Sharon Instr. Aide 8-21-00 1NA925 Reason: None Given FAJRPARK 1-5-04 1-03 Barnes, Connie Child Nut. 9-29-03 FSH550 Reason: Personal FULBRIGHT 1-21-04 3-01 ANNUAL SALARY 50712.00 annual 28166.95 prorated 9.15 per hr 7121.00 11635.00 8130.00 Personnel Changes Page 7 February 26, 2004 NAME Bates, Betty Reason: Retired Boykin, Lalicia Reason: None Given Britton, Erica POSITION SCHOOL Secretary FAIR Custodian HALL Instr. Aide Reason: Returning to School GIBBS Burton, Jennifer Care Reason: None Given CARE Canady, Aquanetta Care Reason: None Given CARE Clegg, Shirleta Care Reason: None Given CARE Davis, Eleanor Care Reason: None Given CARE Doyne, Pamela Care Reason: None Given CARE Fairchild, Hattie Child Nutrition Reason: None Given WILLIAMS Fisher, Lisa Secretary Reason: Personal SOUTHWEST Goodman, Phyllis Care Reason: None Given , CARE START DATE END DATE 6-15-87 2-27-04 7-29-99 1-30-04 9-9-03 2-3-04 1-18-00 1-21-04 9-9-02 1-21-04 1-22-02 1-21-04 8-18-03 1-21-04 2-4-02 1-21-04 8-26-91 12-1-03 9-29-03 2-5-04 10-25-03 1-20-04 SALARY CLASS 44-20 CLK12 1-01 CUS925 1-03 INA925 1-05 CARE 3-07 CARE 4-01 CARE 1-03 CARE 3-03 CARE 5-13 FSH6 39-12 CLKlO 1-07 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 33396.00 10329.00 11635.00 6.68 7.68 6.25 6.43 7.12 9274.00 22656.00 6.97 ~ a, C: il\"Sz!? ~e 0~ !~ m en !ZI ,... ~ en m \u0026gt; C\u0026gt; Rl m I:: mz - il\"s ~~ l!!!\n::c zo C\u0026gt;O 0 ,- .., en ..,m \u0026gt;\no C') :S\n=~ :3 en m en .!Z.I Cl ~\n: z C )\u0026gt; z rrr. Personnel Changes Page 8 February 26, 2004 NAME Handy, Rosilyn Reason: None Given Harris, Fayette Reason: None Given Harvell, Lola Reason: None Given Hussian, Lateesha Reason: None Given Johnson, J arnes Reason: Terminated Johnson, Nikol POSITION SCHOOL Care CARE Child Nutrition CENTRAL Care CARE Custodian DUNBAR Instr. Aide ALC Instr. Aide START DATE END DATE 9-10-01 1-21-04 10-2-03 2-26-04 9-29-03 1-20-04 8-21-79 1-5-04 8-14-03 2-12-04 1-13-00 Reason: Returning To School MITCHELL 1-16-04 Jones, Ruthie Child Nutrition 8-4-97 Reason: Health OTTERCREEK 12-18-03 Kennedy, Jarvis Custodian 8-8-03 Reason: None Given CENTRAL 2-2-04 Knight, Cynthia Child Nutrition 1-16-03 Reason: Accepted Another CLOVERDALE MID.1-8-04 Position Lee, Roy Custodian 4-22-91 Reason: Retired TERRY 12-5-03 Martin, Fred Custodian 8-13-01 Reason: Health MEADOW CLIFF 1-30-04 SALARY CLASS 1-05 CARE 3-01 FSH550 3-08 CARE 1-03 CUS925 1-10 INA925 1-07 INA185 1-06 FSH5 1-01 CUS928 3-02 FSH550 1-11 CUS928 1-11 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 6.68 8130.00 7.82 11201.00 14067.00 13115.00 7532.00 10329.00 8158.00 14461.00 14461.00 Personnel Changes Page 9 February 26, 2004 NAME Turner, Lois Reason: Accepted Another Position Washington, Sydney Reason: None Given Williams, Angela Reason: Personal Williams, Charlotte Reason: Health Young, Cylde POSITION SCHOOL Child Nutrition CENTRAL Child Nutrition START DATE END DATE 8-12-03 1-30-04 4-1-03 CHILD NUTRITION 12-9-03 Instr. Aide 11-4-03 ROMINE 12-31-03 Child Nutrition 9-22-03 HALL 12-15-03 Custodian 3-18-02 Reason: Returning to School MCDERMOTT  12-3-03 SALARY CLASS 3-12 FSH550 2-01 FSMEAL 1-10 INA925 3-01 FSH550 1-02 CUS12 New Non-Certified Employees Beard, Roberta Instr. Aide 1-20-04 1-10 FAIR PARK INA925 Blackmon, Ronald Security Officer 2-2-04 36-14 ALC SOFR9 Ervin, Christin Instr. Aide 2-3-04 1-01 GIBBS INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 8470.00 11593.00 14067.00 8130.00 13955.00 14067.00 annual 6615.29 prorated 15390.00 annual 6426.59 prorated 7086.59 annual 2949.55 prorated ~ a, C: ii\" 2z? ~i:! c~ ~ :0 m~ emn !I' ,.. ! en m \u0026gt; C, Fil m :mI: .z..\n,,:s ~~ !\n::c ~8 o.., re-n ..,m \u0026gt; :0 n:S r=~ ::! en emn !ll  Gl ~\n: z ,C. zr. rr Personnel Changes Page 10 February 26, 2004 NAME Finch, Felicia Fortenberry, Carolyn Ghant, atlyn Graham, Linda Gray, Cleola Hawkins, Derrick Higgins, Melissa POSITION SCHOOL Trainee CHILD NUT. Bus Driver TRANS. Care CA.RE Child Nutrition BALE Bus Driver TRANS. Instr. Aide KING Instr. Aides FRANKLIN START DATE END DATE 1-5-04 2-2-04 2-13-04 1-7-04 2-2-04 1-26-04 2-9-04 SALARY CLASS 2-01 FSMEAL 3-01 BUSDRV 3-05 CARE 3-01 FSH550 2-02 BUSDRV 1-10 INA925 1-10 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 11593.00 annual 6108.14 prorated 9540.00 annual 4073.26 prorated 7.40 8130.00 annual 4220.49 prorated 8956.00 annual 3823.91 prorated 14067.00 annual 6311.14 prorated 14067.00 annual 5550.76 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 February 26, 2004 NAME Hooks, Marichal Johnson, Linda Johnson, Stephanie Jones, Mary Lyons,Peggy Mondy, Lisa Myers, Dale POSITION SCHOOL Bus Driver TRANS. Custodian FULBRIGHT Child Nutrition OTTERCREEK Child Nutrition CLOVERDALE EL. Instr. Aide FAIR.PARK Security Officer CENTRAL Custodian WILLIAMS START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 1-19-04 1-28-04 12-1-03 1-20-04 2-6-04 1-21-04 SALARY CLASS 3-04 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-07 FSH550 3-01 FSH550 1-10 1NA925 36-10 SOFR9 1-01 CUS12 ANNUAL SALARY 11296.00 annual 4823.01 prorated 5164.50 annual 2441.91 prorated 8312.00 annual 3679.08 prorated 8130.00 annual 5020.16 prorated 14067.00 annual 6615.29 prorated 13657.00 annual 5402.77 prorated 13399.00 annual 6271.87 prorated ~ a, C:  en z ~~ C kl ~~ m~ m en !I' ,- e~n m i ~ m I:: .mz..\ni-s ~~ l!,\n::c ~8 0 ,- -.,en ..,m -~n~ 3 g: m en !Zl  Cl ~\n: z C: \"zr. M' Personnel Changes Page 12 February 26, 2004 NAME Relford, Yolanda Simpson, Sylvia Terry, Shirley Tidwell, Darrell Tribulak, Ashley Trussell, Kimo Turner, James POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide WASHINGTON Custodian START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 1-26-04 MABELV ALE MID. Bus Driver 2-2-04 TRANS. Child Nutrition 2-2-04 CHILDNUTR. Care 2-9-04 CARE Instr. Aide 1-27-04 CHICOT Security Officer 1-8-04 WOODRUFF SALARY CLASS 1-10 INA925 1-01 CUS925 3-02 BUSDRV 1-01 FSH4 2-02 CARE 1-10 INA925 36-11  SOFR9 ANNUAL SALARY 14067.00 annual 5930.95 prorated 5164.50 annual 2329.64 prorated 10118.00 annual 4320.04 prorated 7121.00 annual 2986.23 prorated 6.80 14067.00 annual 6235.10 prorated 14065.00 annual 7032.50 prorated Personnel Changes Page 13 February 26, 2004 NAME Urias, Oscar Weaver, Nellieann Williams, Wanda Williams, Yalanda NONE NONE POSITION SCHOOL Custodian START DATE END DATE 2-2-04 CLOVERDALE MID. Instr. Aide 1-14-04 STEPHE S Bus Driver 2-2-04 TRANS. Instr. Aide 1-12-04 CHICOT Non-Certified Promotion Non-Certified Transfer SALARY CLASS 1-01 CUS12 1-10 INA925 3-02 BUSDRV 1-10 INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 13399.00 annual 6815.74 prorated 14067.00 annual 7451.71 prorated 10188.00 annual 4320.04 prorated 14067.00 annual 6995.48 prorated\ni a, C: ?-Sz!? ~\ncgi ~~ m~ m UI !D ,... !j'\n! UI m \u0026gt; C) ~ m :I: .mz.. . ?\"s ~~ !\n:c ~8 0,... -,, UI ..,m ~~ rn m UI ,,. 2 ~ c,,-.: Personnel Changes Page 14 February 26, 2004 NAME Moore, Erica Moore, Cristen POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE Sabbatical Leave SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY Date of Hire 8-17-00 Length of Sabbatical 1 year (2004-2005) Date of Hire 8-12-99 Length of Sabbatical 1 year (2004-2005) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: February 26, 2004 To: Board of Education From: Morris L. Holmes, Ed. 0. Interim Superintendent Re: Naming of Facilities: Mann Magnet Middle School The faculty, staff, parents and students of Mann Magnet Middle School have submitted a request to name the school auditorium in honor of Mr. James L. Matthis. The request and supporting documents are submitted in accordance with Policy FF: Naming of Facilities. The administration recommends approval. bjg r\u0026gt; ill ~a -t- -1: ~~ ::a~ ~~ !i\nm C:\n,,se z ~~ C kl !~ m en IT z C ~ C': IT NAMING AND RENAMING F ACLITIES I propose that the Horace Mann Magnet Middle School Auditorium (Designation of building and/or other location) 1000 East Roosevelt Rd., Little Rock, AR 72206 (Address) Be named for James L. Matthis I. Biographical Data: Attached II. The Nominee's significant contribution is: Attached III. I believe the facility should be named for this person because: Attached (Signature) (Date) This form should be submitted by person nominating names for new facilities to the LRSD Board of Education for consideration according to Board policy FF. I. II. Biographical Data: Mr. James L. Matthis was born on January 23, 1939 in Jefferson, Texas. He received his early education in the Macedonia Schools in Jefferson, Texas. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Wiley College Marshall, Texas, and his Masters Degree from the University of Central Arkansas Conway, Arkansas. Additional course work was complete at UCA. Prior to beginning an exceptional professional career, he was a member of the Army Reserve and was stationed at Fort Smith, Arkansas. The Nominee's significant contribution is: Mr. Matthis began his professional career as a high school music teacher in Augusta, Arkansas. He shared his gifts in the education profession for forty years. He devoted the last thirty-six years of service in the Little Rock Public Schools beginning as a vocational coordinator at Horace Mann High School, Administrator-Opportunity Gateway School, ESAU Coordinator-Federal Programs and Assistant Principal-Mann Magnet Middle School. III. I believe the facility should be named for this person because: We the staff at Mann Magnet believe that the Mann Auditorium should be named James Matthis Auditorium for various reasons. Mr. Matthis taught music. The auditorium was part of the original Horace Mann r\u0026gt; ill\ngg\nor- -\u0026lt;- -o-\n=g ~o\n~ ~ ID C:\n\u0026gt;S!? z ii cf(l !~ m \"' IT z ~ r. IT High School during his tenure as a teacher. He was responsible for the smooth operation of the auditorium. He watched thousands of students walk across the stage. Mr. Matthis' most cherished responsibilities focused on helping students to become good scholars and citizens, supporting administrators, teachers, and support staff in accomplishing their assigned responsibilities and assisting parents in helping their students in school. For these reasons, we believe Mann's Auditorium should be named in honor of Mr. Matthis. TO: Board of Education SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 447-1130 FROM: Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services Dr. Lloyd Sain, Coordinator of Leadership Development THROUGH: Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent DATE: February 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Resolution to 4G: Attendance Rubric The District and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association {LRCTA) have completed their task as requested by the Board in proposing an alternative to the on-going discussion with Domain 4, item 4G (attendance and punctuality). On February 1th, we submitted for your review our recommendation and now solicit your direction on this matter. !='\nK:c, :::.o nz ::c U\u0026gt; m~\n'\"c' ~c: \"i!! ins C) z ~~ PJ8 ~m LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: February 26, 2004 To: From: Through: Board of Education Sadie Mitchell,~ciate Superintendent-School Services Lloyd Sain, Coordinator - Leadership Development Morris L. Holmes, Ed. D. Interim Superintendent Re: A School Improvement Report: An Overview of the Schools and Their School Improvement Progress, Grants, and Initiatives The above named report is being provided under separate cover. We will be available to review the findings and respond to any questions you might have. Please feel free to contact us if we can provide any additional information. bjg !\" 8 ~ lz5 en !=' ll:n ::.o nz ::c en m-1 rr--\"C': ,\".\", C..'). i5 0 :CZ -I a, enc: ~8 r-m MEMORANDUM I FACILITY SERVICES DIRECTORATE DATE: TO: SUBJ: February 9, 2004 Dr. Morris, L. Homes, Interim Superintendent r. Do Stewart, Chief Financial Officer ~ton, Director of Facility Services nformation: Land Sale - Forest Heights Middle School The Little Rock School District has received a viable offer from a company known as Mangan Properties, LLC, of Little Rock, for the purchase of the property immediately west of Forest Heights Middle School for the sum of $200,000. This $200,000 figure includes the Little Rock School District's realtor's fee of 9%. The property was professionally appraised in December of 2003 at $188,000. It is the intention of Mangan Properties to construct a dental office at this location that will present a single-story office building with associated parking. The building will tie-in well with the neighborhood and the adjoining buildings, and I believe that it will make an excellent neighbor to our school property and not interfere with the operations of the school. The details of the sale of the property are such that there will be a vision screen from the school looking toward this property. The Offer and Acceptance that you signed has been forwarded to Rector Phillips Morse for notification to Mangan Properties. DE:cg !\" 8 ~ iz5 en !=' !I:(\") =I 0 nz % en m--1 r-\n:c r- C: go(\")\n:c__, i\n~ ~~ mo r- C) r- m FOREST HEIGHTS PROPERTY March 24, 1983  J RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas, herein called \"District,\" is the owner of the following described lands located in the City of Little Rock, Arkansas: and\nA tract of land located in the NW SW Section 31, T-2-N, R-12-W, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point on the South right-of-way line of Evergreen Drive, (formerly \"K\" Street), 30 ft. South of the centerline and 70 ft. East of the West line of said Section 31\nthence S 8g(ll6'10\"E along said South right-of-way line 275.0 ft. to a point\nthence South along a line, parallel with said West line of said Section 31, 450.06 ft. to a point\nthence NS916'10\"W and parallel with the South rightof- way line of Evergreen Drive, 295.0 ft. to a point on the East right-of-way line of North University Avenue, said point being 50 ft. East of the West line of said Section 31\nthence North along said East right-of-way line and 50 ft. East of and parallel with the West line of said Section 31, 230 ft. to a point\nthence East and continuing along said East rightof- way line, 5.0 ft. to a point\nthence North and continuing along said East right-of-way line, 55.0 ft. East and parallel with the West line of said Section 31, 205.0 ft. to a point\nthence Northeasterly along the arc of a 14.81 ft. (Deed 15.0 ft.) radius curve to the right, having a chord bearing and distance of N4521 '55\"E, 21.08 ft. to the point of beginning containing 131,609 sq. ft. or 3.0213 Acres more or less. WHEREAS, said lands are hereby found to be surpl~s to the needs of the District, and are accordingly no longer needed for school purposes and should be abandoned and sold\nand WHEREAS, in order to convey merchantable title to said lands free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, it is necessary to secure releases of said lands from the liens of several mortgages or deeds of ti-ust securing bonds issued by the District, and it will be necessary in order to secure such releases that the District place the proceeds of the sale in the Building Fund of the District to be used exclusively for either repairs or new construction of buildings and other facilities for school purposes . of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas: l. That the administration take the necessary measures to offer for sale the above described surplus lands which are no longer needed for school purposes. 2. That no offer be accepted except by resolution of this Board convened in a legal meeting. 3. That the proceeds, if any, from the sale of said lands be placed in the Building Fund of the District and will be used exclusively for either repairs or new construction of buildings and other facilities for school purposes. 4. That a certified copy of this Resolution be delivered to the several trustees of the mortgages and deeds of trust presently encumbering the above described property, this Board requesting that upon receipt of such certified Resolution said corporate trustees forthwith release, in recordable form, the above described lands from each of the separate mortgages and deeds of trust aforesaid, as same are applicable to each corporate trustee. ADOPTED: March 24, 1983 STATE OF ARKANSAS) ) ss COUNTY OF PULASKI) Subscribed and sworn to before me My Commission Expires 7/1/83 this 24th day of March, 1983. . c\n?:t,,na, )t' ~,,,., ,~ J Notary Pu ic - 8 z ~ lz5 Cl) :.n., z ~ 0 ,\n,Cl) ~n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" TO: Board of Education THROUGH: Dr. Morris L. Holmes I Superintendent of Schools FROM: SUBJECT: ease: Miles Memorial Church Title/Subject: Short Summary: Objectives: Expected Outcomes: Population/Location: Budget Amount/Source of Budget: Manager: Duration: Long Range/Continuation: Other Agencies Involved: Expectations of the District: Needed Staff: Comments: Recommendations: Attachment: Copy of proposed lease Request for leasing action. The Miles Memorial Christian Methodist Episcopal Church has requested to lease the parkin~ lot at the Procurement Office, 1800 East 61 St. Not applicable Not applicable Office/Procurement Office, 1800 East 6th St. Not applicable Doug Eaton, Director of Facility Services One year beginning March 2004 and ending February 2005 Not applicable Miles Memorial CME Church Not applicable Not applicable The Miles Memorial CME Church, recently constructed across from Procurement, has requested the use of our parking lot during non-working hours to support their functions until their parking lot can be constructed. Their parking lot is expected to be completed within one year. It is recommended that this leasing action be approved. The Little Rock School District has entered into similar leases to support nonprofit organizations in our community. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 8 ! lz5 Cl) !=' :l:n =l 0 nz :Z:CII mr --\n\u0026lt;o r c: gon\no .... i5\n~~ fgo rr mC\u0026gt; LEASE AGREEMENT Lease made this ____ day of __________ _ , by and between Little Rock School District, as Lessor, and Miles Memorial CME Church of Little Rock, Arkansas, as Lessee. WINESSETH Lessor hereby leases to Lessee the entire premises described as follows : SEE EXHIBIT A A TT ACHED HERETO, m the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, for the term of one year beginning on ______________ , at yearly rental of twelve dollars ($12.00) payable in equal monthly installments, or a lump sum, at the office of the Lessor. This lease may be extended from year to year on the same terms and conditions by express agreement of the Lessor and the Lessee. CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, AND OTHER PROVISIONS I. In the event that the said premises shall be or become unsafe for the continuation of the Lessee's use thereof, or if Lessee be prevented by any present or future law or ordinance and/or by the authorities having jurisdiction in the premises from continuing use of said premises, this lease shall terminate at the option of the Lessee on sixty (60) days' notice, in writing, to the Lessor by registered mail addressed to the Lessor at the place of address listed herein or such other address as the Lessor may hereafter in writing specify\nand the Lessor agrees, thereupon, to return to the Lessee any rent paid in advance for the unexpired term. II. Lessor represents and warrants to be the owner of the premises described above and to have the authority to make this lease. III. Lessor reserves the right to terminate this lease by giving thirty (30) days' notice in writing by registered mail to Lessee. IV. The Lessee shall take good care of the leased premises and be responsible for any repairs necessitated by any act or negligence of the Lessee or the agents, employees, or visitors of the Lessee. V. The Lessee shall not do, or permit to be done, anything in or about the leased premises that interferes with the rights of other tenants of the Lessor or that conflicts with State or Municipal law or regulations of the Fire Department or Board of Health that creates a nuisance or that is dangerous to persons or property. VI. The Lessee shall not do, or permit to be done, anything in or about the leased premises that increases the fire hazard or that causes the premises to become uninsurable or results in increased rates for fire or extended insurance coverage. VII. The Lessee shall be allowed to make alterations or improvements to the leased premises with the prior written consent of Lessor. Such alternations shall be at the expense of the Lessee, subject to the other provisions of this lease, and shall become a part of the premises. The Lessor shall have the right to retain the premises as improved at the termination of said lease. VIII. Upon termination of this lease, the Lessee shall surrender possession of the leased premises to the Lessor in a condition as good as it was when the Lessee took possession, ordinary wear and tear, damage by fire, casualty, and the elements excepted. IX. This lease shall not be assigned or any part of the leased premises sublet to any agency, organization, entity or individual without prior written approval of the Lessor. Lessor retains the right to review the specific sublet documents, including terms, conditions, and financial agreements, before granting approval to sublet any or all of the premises covered under this lease. X. The Lessee shall hold the Lessor harmless from liability against all damages or injury to persons or property arising during the term of this lease and caused by any act or negligence of the Lessee or the agents, employees, or visitors of the Lessee. XI. No sign, picture, advertisement, or notice shall be affixed to any part of the leased premises except as approved by the Lessor\nand the Lessor may remove the same, if objectionable, with written notice to the Lessee and the removal to be at the Lessee's expense. Upon termination of this lease, the Lessee shall remove any such sign, picture, advertisement, or notice affixed to the leased premises and restore the place it occupied to the condition existing at the time of commencement of this lease. XII. This lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. It shall be governed by the laws of the State of Arkansas and is severable for interpretation purposes. 2 !\" 8 z s z U\u0026gt; XIII. The Lessor reserves the right to have first preference for the use of the leased premises. The Lessor and Lessee will work together to avoid conflicts in the use of the leased premises. The leased premises will be used by the Lessee for Sunday services only. Permission for uses of the leased premises by the Lessee at times other than as specified in this paragraph will be requested from the Lessor prior to their use. XIV. By entering into this agreement, the Lessor does not obligate itself, in any way, to meet any financial or contractual obligations by the Lessee in securing necessary permits for enhancement or modifications to the Lessee's property nor is the Lessor obligated to modify the leased premises to meet any conditions as expressed in any permits secured by the Lessee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this lease on the day and year first above mentioned. LESSOR: LESSEE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 By: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Miles Memorial CME Church By: Title: 3 Exhibit \"A\" The leased premises are described as the west parking lot bordering Bender Street at the Little Rock School District's Procurement and Materials Management Supply Center at1800 East 6th Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4 8 z ~ iz5 en !=' l:o =I 0 oz :mc ..e.n, ,-,a ,... C: jloO :ID .... c:c' izo .... a, emnco: ,... C) r-m Memorandum Date: February 26, 2004 To: Little Rock School District Board of Directors From: ~arral Paradis, Director of Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management Through: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools ~ald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Subject Request for Resolution authorizing the refinance/consolidation of the District's outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt. Summary: The District has the following outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt agreements in place: Company City First Bank Community Bank Community Bank Crews \u0026amp; Assoc. Stephens Inc. Yearly Due Date 10/15 1/05 1/15 1/15 1/15 Payment $70,177.36 $55,499.47 $47,054.75 $66,852.10 $65,568.10 Amount Outstanding $140,354.72 $166,498.41 $141,164.25 $267,408.40 $327,840.50 Interest Rate 5% 6.14% 6.45% 5.23% 4.5% The Procurement department issued an RFP (request for proposals) to consolidate and refinance the debt above to take advantage of current lower interest rates. Bank of America offered the best overall rate - 2.97%. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark has reviewed the master lease that consolidates the above agreements and prepared the attached resolution for your approval. Objective: To streamline paperwork and take advantage of savings from current lower interest rates by consolidating/refinancing debt. Expected Outcomes: Savings to the District of Approximately $52,000. New consolidated payment will be made on January 15 of each year. NO time extension was made to the term of original debt other than to coordinate this date. g ~ z \"' Board of Directors February 26, 2004 Page 2 Population/Location: IA Budget Amount/Source of Budget: Transportation Department - All of these funds were used to purchase school buses. The annual payments are being made from the LRSD Transportation Department budget. Manager: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management Duration: Last payment will be January 15, 2009. Long Range: NIA Other Agencies Involved: LRSD Transportation Department Expectations of District: NIA Needed Staff: NIA Comments: None Recommendation We request the Board of Education approve the resolution for the refinance/consolidation of the district's outstanding lease-purchase and post-dated warrant debt as detailed above. 2 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Little Rock School District (the \"District\") desires to consolidate/refinance various leases/existing debt related to the District's lease/purchase of various items of equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations\nand WHEREAS, the District desires to accomplish the consolidation/refinance by entering into a Master Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors that Don Stewart, as Chief Financial Officer of the District, is authorized, on behalf of the District, to enter into, execute, and deliver that certain Master Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement (the \"Agreement\") with Banc of America Leasing \u0026amp; Capital, LLC, related to the District's lease and/or acquisition of certain equipment utilized by the District in its day-to-day operations (the general form of which Agreement is attached to the Resolution). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands as the Little Rock School District Board of Directors on this ___ day of February, 2004. !\" 8 ! cz5 en Date: To: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT February 26, 2004 Little Rock School District Board of Directors Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Subject: Construction Budget Revision- Mitchell and Rightsell Based on Facility Services and Dr. Stewarts' analysis regarding the scope of work needed at Mitchell and Rightsell, the recommendation is that the Board approve sufficient funds, making up the budget shortfalls in the amonts of $1.54 million for Mitchell and $1 .78 million for Rightsell. The Board received a report at the last board agenda meeting that sufficient funds are available in the Bond Funds. /dge cc: Dr. Don Stewart Chief Financial Officer 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 447-1002 !\" 8 ! iz5 en Attachment: Related Information: - For the 2004-05 school year the projected enrollments from Student Assignment are: Mitchell: 228 Rightsell: 243 - For the beginning of the 2004-05 school year, the plan is to locate the Mitchell student body at the Badgett Elementary School site. - Mr. Eaton has speculated that Mitchell could be available for occupancy by the end of the Winter Holiday season, 2004. '.54.n Individual Approach to a World if Knowledge\" DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent ~M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer PREPARED B~uglas C. Eaton, Director, Facility Services SUBJECT: Construction Budget Revision - Mitchell and Rightsell Attached are Executive Summaries and Scopes of Work for the Mitchell and Rightsell Renovation Projects. The purpose of these documents is to assist the Board in determining if the District will proceed with these projects. As noted in the Executive Summaries, the budget shortfall for the Mitchell project is $1.54 million and for Rightsell the shortfall is $1.78 million. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 '\" i cz5 (II Mitchell Elementary School Executive Summary I. Purpose: The purpose of this summary is to provide information regarding a decision as to whether sufficient funding will be made available to repair Mitchell Elementary School. II. Problem: The problem before us is to decide whether Mitchell Elementary School should receive sufficient funding in order to enhance its overall appearance and structural integrity to the point where it can continue as an elementary school. ill. Facts bearing on the problem:  Age and Condition: Mitchell Elementary School is essentially a wood-frame building with a brick structural veneer and a plaster interior. It has wooden floors that have been overlaid with another layer of tile, and in many areas with carpeting. The building does not meet the current codes\nyet, in many areas, it is not deficient. It was designed for an operating capacity of 258 students plus academic and support staff. It sits on a lot of less than three acres in size and has a small parking lot and play area. It was expanded in the 1980s with the addition of three extra classrooms. Projects were completed in the 1970s and 80s that added air conditioning, upgraded code-deficient areas, such as plumbing and electric, and most recently has had energy-efficient lighting installed. The Building is structurally sound, yet it is beginning to show deterioration in a number of areas. In 1995 surveys were done for all buildings in the Little Rock School District. Needed renovations and repairs included substantial replacements of every building system, which when completed would still render the building inadequate for an elementary school of the 1990s. Beginning in 1998 the Little Rock School District began an initiative to re-summarize the needs of its facilities. The needs, at that time, totaled $950,000 and centered around environmental needs, structural needs, technology and electrical upgrades, ADA compliance, restroom renovations, and changes to the administrative and academic space. Specifically\nroof and structural repairs, waterproofing the facility, mold remediation,\" interior and exterior renovations of classrooms and administrative space, landscaping, bringing the building within ADA compliance, adding a classroom, and adding a heating-ventilation fresh-air return system, and making electrical upgrades to support all the aforementioned, plus technology that is required in our facilities.  Financial Considerations: The Little Rock School District has allocated $950,000 for any and all work to be accomplished at Mitchell Elementary School. As may be seen by the attached enclosure, this is not a sufficient level of funding due to all the work that is necessary to bring this facility inline so that a reasonable life can be expected for this capital investment. The funding shortfall is estimated at $1.54 million dollars.  Attendance Considerations: At this point in time it is anticipated that Mitchell could be impacted by the districts new attendance zone plan. Students presently attending Mitchell will be given the opportunity of choice which will allow them to attend schools in their attendance zone. A decrease in student population at this school would warrant an examinatjon of the per pupil cost for facility rehabilitation. IV. Courses of Action:  Re-examining the role of Mitchell Elementary school as an educational facility in LRSD: The possible decrease of student population coupled with the cost of repairs warrants a look at whether investing in Mitchell Elementary school is cost effective.  Reduce the scope of work to minimum essential: Decreasing the scope of work to accomplish minimum essential necessary to maintain the facility. This is predicated on a reduced occupancy.  Redefine the scope of work for non school facility: Should the facility cease to remain as a school, a reduced scope of work could be accomplished to maintain the facility and convert it to another LRSD purpose.  Do not accomplish the repairs: This course of action is only an option if LRSD decides not to retain the facility. And then, some expense will be incurred to preserve the facility for either retention or disposal. !\" 8 ! \u0026lt;z'5 en Scope of Work Mitchell Elementary School Mitchell Elementary School: a. Roof and Gutter replacement An examination needs to be made of the surface of all roofs of Mitchell Elementary School and the substructure of the roof along with the gutters and downspouts to determine extent of repairs necessary to ensure a safe and dry facility. Including within this should be an examination of the re-insulation of the attic space. b. Heating-Ventilation Unit Replacement It has been determined that the units in the building, installed in the late 1970s, have far outlived their usefulness. We desire that the scope of work include replacement of the air-handling units. We wish to retain much of the original system outside the building as well as the heating system and boiler inside the building. It is simply the air-handling units that we would like exchanged. c. A Fresh-Air System We would like an investigation and a scope of work to be done to provide a fresh-air system to all occupied space in the facility that will meet current ASHRE standards. It is our desire that this freshair system run independently of any heating or air-conditioning system. d. An Electrical Upgrade to Support Technology and any added Airconditioning or Fresh-air Systems The electrical upgrade to support technology will require us to delineate outlets in each classroom, but an estimated number of five to six per classroom will be needed. e. Interior Water Damage Those portions of the building that have been damaged due to infiltration of water from the exterior surface or from leaky pipes need to be repaired in the most efficient manner. g. Excessive Wear Due to Age Those areas of the building that have shown excessive wear or damage due to age and have caused plumbing leaks will be repaired as economically as possible. h. Administrative Renovation: It is our desire to modify the main lobby area to expand the administrative complex to provide for a new office for the principal and secretary. 1. ADA: We would like to try to adapt Mitchell Elementary School with a lift-system that allows students to get between the first and second floor. J. Waterproofing: We would like, upon the completion of all work at Mitchell Elementary School, for a waterproof coating to be applied to the exterior brick surface. k. Landscaping: We would like the rip-rap favade around the two sides of the school where it is presently located filled in with concrete to provide a permanent surface from the sidewalk up to the ground level of the school, eliminating all grass and growth in this area. 1. We would like the asphalt behind Mitchell Elementary School removed at the upper level and replaced with sod. m. Classroom addition: We would like a one-classroom addition ranging in size from 750 to 800 square feet. This would be a standard classroom with no water or restroom facilities. It would have cabinetry on one wall, at least a 12-foot-long chalkboard with 4-foot bulletin-board extensions on each end. There would be a coat rack, carpeted flooring, and wiring connected to the building's existing intercom and data systems. 2 !\" Rightsell Elementary School Executive Summary I. Purpose: The purpose of this summary is to provide information regarding a decision as to whether sufficient funding will be made available to repair Rightsell Elementary School. II. Problem: The problem before us is to decide whether Rightsell Elementary School should receive sufficient funding in order to enhance its overall appearance and structural integrity to the point where it can continue as an elementary school. ill. Facts bearing on the problem:  Age and Condition: Rightsell Elementary School is essentially a wood-frame building with a brick structural veneer and a plaster interior. It has wooden floors that have been overlaid with another layer of tile, and in many areas with carpeting. The building does not meet the current codes\nyet, in many areas, it is not deficient. It was designed for an operating capacity of 258 students plus academic and support staff. It sits on a lot of less than three acres in size and has a small parking lot and play area. It was expanded in the 1990s with the addition of one extra classroom. Projects were completed in the 1970s and 80s that added air conditioning, upgraded code-deficient areas, such as plumbing and electric, and most recently has had energy-efficient lighting installed. The Building is structurally sound, yet it is beginning to show deterioration in a number of areas. In 1995 surveys were done for all buildings in the Little Rock School District. Needed renovations and repairs included substantial replacements of every building system, which when completed would still render the building inadequate for an elementary school of the 1990s. Beginning in 1998 the Little Rock School District began an initiative to re-summarize the needs of its facilities. The needs, at that time, totaled $800,000 and centered around environmental needs, structural needs, technology and electrical upgrades, ADA compliance, restroom renovations, and changes to the administrative and academic space. Specifically\nroof and structural repairs, waterproofing the facility, mold remediation, landscaping, bringing the building within ADA compliance, adding a classroom, and adding a heating-ventilation fresh-air return system, and making electrical upgrades to support all the aforementio'ned, plus technology that is required in our facilities.  Financial Considerations: The Little Rock School District has allocated $800,000 for any and all work to be accomplished at Rightsell Elementary School. As may be seen by the attached enclosure, this is-not a sufficient level of funding due to all the work that is necessary to bring this facility inline so that a reasonable life can be expected for this capital investment. The funding shortfall is estimated at $1.78 million dollars.  Attendance Considerations: As of this writing is anticipated that Rightsell could be impacted by the districts new attendance zone plan. Students presently attending Rightsell will be given the opportunity of choice, which will allow them to attend schools in their attendance zone. A decrease in student population at this school would warrant an examination of the per pupil cost for facility rehabilitation IV. Courses of Action:  Re-examining the role of Rightsell Elementary school as an educational facility in LRSD: The possible decrease of student population coupled with the cost of repairs warrants a look at whether investing in Rightsell Elementary school is cost effective.  Reduce the scope of work to minimum essential: Decreasing the scope of work to accomplish minimum essential necessary to maintain the facility. This is predicated on a reduced occupancy.  Redefine the scope of work for non school facility: Should the facility cease to remain as a school, a reduced scope of work could be accomplished to maintain the facility and convert it to another LRSD purpose.  Do not accomplish the repairs: This course of action is only an option if LRSD decides not to retain the facility. And then, some expense will be incurred to preserve the facility for either retention or disposal. 8 ~ a z UI School: Scope of Work Rightsell Elementary School Rightsell Elementary School: a. The Fresh-Air Unit The fresh-air unit will be as specified on Mitchell, above. b. Electrical Upgrade The electrical upgrade will be as specified on Mitchell, above. c. Remediation ofHV AC Closets In this particular case, it was determined that the heatingventilation closets are going to have to be completely gutted and all fungi remediated to ensure a safe atmosphere. This, of course, will include the replacement of these units, in kind. d. HV AC Unit Replacement HV AC unit replacement will be as specified on Mitchell, above. It is our intent to save as much of the main system that provides heat to the building as possible and concentrate on the replacement of the air-handling units installed in the building in the late 1970s. e. Resealing of the Basement Walls I would like consideration given to excavating the entire building down to the footers to expose all basement walls and have these walls resealed to prevent water-infiltration. f. Interior Drainage Determine the extent of the interior drainage to determine whether the interior storm-water drainage-system can be abandoned and included within the design of \"g\" stated below. g. Determine the scope and cost for a gutter and downspout system to divert water from internal drains to an exterior drain system. 3 Included within this should be the necessary gutters and downspouts and the ceiling of the roof. Consideration should also be given to an analysis and replacement of the flat-roof portion of the school. h. Interior Repairs Those portions of the building that have been damaged because of water penetration shall be repaired in the most economical manner. 1. ADA: We would like a lift-system installed to enable students with disabilities to transverse the first and second floors. J. Classroom Addition: We would like one 750 to 800 square-foot classroom, with no water or restroom facilities, added to the facility. It would have built-in shelving or cabinetry on one side, black or dry-erase boards on one end, carpeted flooring, energy-efficient lighting, coat rack and shelves on one wall, and would be connected to the District's data and intercom system. k. Asbestos removal: To be removed commensurate with renovation work needed. Board report.doc 4 !\" 8 z ~ lz5 C/) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Junious Babbs SUBJECT: Mitchell and Rightsell Five (5) Year Projections DATE: February 12, 2004 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 447-2955 E-Mail: junious.babbs@lrsd.org In response to the request for Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary School five (5) year projections, the following information is being provided: Mitchell and Rightsell Elementary Five Year Plan This document is a projection of student numbers for two (2) Little Rock School District elementary schools over the period 2003-04 through 2008-09. Projections are based on a set of assumptions and conditions as they exist in February 2004. Assumptions and Conditions Projections completed for the schools were compiled by \"rolling up\" students currently- attending an elementary school and identifying future students using the average number of kindergarten students who have registered in each attendance zone for the school over the past four ( 4) years. In a case where the demographic in a school zone has changed due to unusual growth or other factors, an adjustment to the average figure would be used for the projection. The numbers for the \"roll up\" students assume an equal mobility rate across the district. As some students in the schools leave a school due to address changes, others will enter at a fairly equal rate. School projections include P4 classes in existence as of February 2004. Growth Assumptions about growth do not include a forecast of substantial numbers of students who do not currently attend LRSD returning to district schools. While that is a desirable condition, there is no data on which to base a projection regarding that occurrence. There are some schools where the projection based on the four-year average of kindergarten enrollment appears to be inconsistent with the recent history of enrollment growth in the school. In this case the projection was adjusted downward due to conditions in the particular school zone. Examples of schools where reductions occurred include both Mitchell and Rightsell, where students from outside the school attendance zone are now allowed to return to their attendance zone school. An additional variable not yet available (i.e. NCLB school choice opportunity) to enter or exit will be determined during a designated period of the school year. It will be important to note that P4 numbers may increase pending recent legislative action. School Enrollment Numbers Over the Past Five (5) Years School 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 Average Mitchell 247 278 298 284 255 272 Ri!!htsell 269 264 268 298 292 278 !\" 8 ~ z Cl) :n ~ z \u0026gt;z ,0. ,Cl) PROJECTION WORKSHEET SCHOOL: Rightsell Elementary School Capacity: 296 GRADE 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 K 40 33 33 33 33 33 1 47 40 33 33 33 33 2 43 47 40 33 33 33 3 33 43 47 40 33 33 4 46 33 43 47 40 33 5 47 46 33 43 47 40 P4 36 36 36 36 36 36 TOTAL 292 278 265 265 255 241 Attending -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 Choice Schools Return to -25 -20 -12 -8 -6 Attendance Zone TOTAL 292 243 235 243 237 225 PROJECTION WORKSHEET SCHOOL: Mitchell Elementary School Capacity: 283 GRADE 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 K 40 36 36 36 36 36 1 41 40 36 36 36 36 2 34 41 40 36 36 36 3 39 34 41 40 36 36 4 44 39 34 41 40 36 5 39 44 39 34 41 40 P4 18 18 18 18 18 18 TOTAL 255 252 244 241 243 238 Attending -11 -10 -8 -7 -6 Choice Schools Return to -13 -13 -13 -13 -13 Attendance Zone TOTAL 255 228 221 220 223 219 2008 and Beyond Revisited stipulation magnet agreements (2008) among the State of Arkansas and the three (3) participating school districts (Little Rock School District, North Little Rock School District, and Pulaski County Special School District) will have significant impact. Pending results may display variation in student enrollment numbers in each LRSD school. cc: Dr. Morris Holmes LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Board of Education FROM: ~al Pru-adis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: Schoo 1/DeQartment Item Donor Bale Elementary School One (1) Sylvania VCR/ Mr. Brian Minchew, DVD player, valued at parent of Bale student $100.00, and 9 Magna Doodle Deluxe Boards, valued at $15.00 each, to the special education self-contained classroom Central High School $300.00 cash to the Mr. Rush Harding, III Lady Panther basketball team Central High School $500.00 cash to the Mr. Ronald Crawford Lady Panther basketball team J.A. Fair Magnet Four ( 4) sections Mr. Woody Rigdon of High School of 6' concrete pipe, Hanson Pipe \u0026amp; Products, Inc. valued at $200.00, for use in outdoor classroom J.A. Fair Magnet Delivery services, Mr. Gary Gaul of High School . valued at $150.00, DUIT Construction Company of four (4) sections of concrete pipe for use in outdoor classroom ~ :i  :! 2 Gi ~ ?' \u0026gt; ~ c\n1: Irr :! Board of Education February 26, 2004 Page 2 School/Department J.A. Fair Magnet High School Martin Luther King, Jr. Interdistrict Magnet Elementary School Martin Luther King, Jr. lnterdistrict Magnet Elementary School Metropolitan Career and Technical Center Pulaski Heights Middle School Woodruff Elementary School 200 tons of rock fines, valued at $500.00, to be used on outdoor trails and greenhouse floor Mr. Haskell Dickinson of Granite Mountain Quarries A Hewlett-Packard copier, M.L. King PT A valued at $130.00, to the Health Services Department . at King $1,500.00 cash to be used Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Duane Jackson for student incentives and and Ms. Genevieve Jackson classroom \u0026amp; instructional materials for Pre-Kand kindergarten curriculum. Funds are to be distributed as follows:  to Ms. Julia Lloyd's class and  to Ms. Shacuna Jones' class. Paints, primers, sealers, reducers, thinners, fillers, tools, tapes, sand paper, polish pad, etc., valued at $21,675.30, to the Paint \u0026amp; Body Program $10,000.00 cash to the instructional program at Pulaski Heights to be allocated as follows: $4,000.00 for the library (1/2 for upper level AR books)\n$1,000.00 each for 7th grade English books, gth grade English books, gth grade science classes, Foreign Language Dept., \u0026amp; the Special Ed Dept. $500.00 each for Math Counts and the Quiz Bowl. Mr. Perry Gravitt, President Hackman Paint \u0026amp; Supply Co., Inc. Winthrop \u0026amp; Lisenne Rockefeller School supplies and uniforms valued at $350.00 Dassault Falcon Jet Corp. Board of Education February 26, 2004 Page 3 School/Department LRSD Athletic Dept. Mahlon Martin Professional Library 124 metal gym lockers, valued at $11,560.00, installed at Forest Heights Middle School \u0026amp; 14 large mirrors, valued at $3,500.00, to be placed in the weight room at Quigley Stadium Educational books valued at $3,500.00 Donor Mr. David Ensminger Arkansas Democrat-Gazette It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Manage From/I\u0026lt; Barbara Anderson, Principal of Bale Elementary School Date: January 15, 2004 Subject: Donation Mr. Brian Minchew, a parent of a student at Bale, wishes to donate a Sylvani1 VCR/DVD player valued at $100.00 to the special education self-contained classroom at Bale. Along with this, 9 Magna Doodle Deluxe Boards, one for each child, will be donated. They are valued at $15.00 each. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the pol\\ of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. LittCe 'Rock Centra( J-fif3li Sclioo( 1500 Soutfi Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, .'Arkansas 72202 Pfione 501-447-1400 ]\"ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 1/9/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL crf!_,~ SUBJECT: DONATION Rush Harding, III, of 4 Valley Creek View, Little Rock, AR 72223, very graciously donated $300 to our Lady Panther basketball team. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED Jfo.N r. c ittCe 'Rock Centra{ J-fffJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutli Park Street Litt[e 'Rock, .Jlrkansas 72202 Phone 501-447-1400 ]'ax 501-447-1401 DATE: 1/9/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DONATION Ronald Crawford graciously donated $500 to our Lady Panther basketball team. Mr. Crawford's address 1s as follows: P. 0. Box 13688 Maumelle, AR 72113. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science * Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering * Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Ci~\\ C~dra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Woody Rigdon, Hanson Pipe and Products, Incorporated, 1300 Bond Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, has generously donated four sections of six foot concrete pipe with a value of $200.00 for use in the J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School outdoor classroom. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. RECEIVED A School of the Little Rock School District TO: FROM: DATE: RE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science  Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering  Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement (l\n\\L Cassandra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Gary Gaul, DUIT Construction Company, 16915 High 1-30, Benton, AR, 72015, has generously provided delivery of four sections of concrete pipe for use in the J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School outdoor classroom. Delivery services for this pipe have value of $150.00. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. A School of the Little Rock School District TO: FROM: DATE: J. A. FAIR MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 13420 David 0. Dodd Road Little Rock, AR 72210 Phone: 501-447-1700 Fax: 501-447-1701 Environmental Science * Information Science \u0026amp; Systems Engineering * Medical Science Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement t~sandra Norman, Principal January 6, 2004 RE: Donation to J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School Mr. Haskell Dickinson, Granite Mountain Quarries, has generously donated 200 tons of rock fines with a value of$500.00 to be used on the outdoor trails and the greenhouse floor of J. A. Fair Systems Magnet High School. It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. Thank you for your consideration. A School of the Little Rock School District MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradise, Director of Procurement bi'~, From: Tyrone Harris, Principal Date: January 5, 2004 Re: Donation The M.L.King PTA, 905 M. L. King Jr. Drive, Little Rock, AR 72202 has generously donated a Hewlett Packard copier for the Health Services Department at King valued at $130.00 It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. I I 1 t .. ' . i 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: TJi Harris, Principal Date: January 5, 2004 Re: Monetary Donation Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Duane and Genevieve Jackson of 16801 Davis Cup Lane in Little Rock, AR 72209 have made a generous donation of $1500.00 to split between Julia Lloyd and Shacuna Jones. It is Mrs. Jackson's wish that the donation be used to purchase student incentives, classroom and instructional materials to support the pre-kindergarten and kindergarten curriculum. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. Thank You 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Michael Peterso~rincipal Donation January 7, 2004 Please accept this generous donation given to Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. Mr. Perry Gravitt, President of Hackman Paint and Supply Co., Inc. of Little Rock, AR, has given Metropolitan's Paint and Body Program $21 ,675.30 worth of paints, primers, sealers, reducers, thinners, fillers, tools, tapes, sand paper, polish pad, etc. These materials will be used for training our students. We recommend that this generous donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. cc: Dr. Marion Lacey, Associate Superintendent Metropolitan Career-Technical Center 7701 Scott Hamilton Drive  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209  (501) 447-1200  Fax (501) 447-1201 PULASKI HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL \"r/)tt,.wi119 r/)anllte, r/)Pide\" Date: January 6, 2004 To: From: Darr~aradis, Director of Procurement 1,W Dr. aniel Whitehorn, PHMS Principal Subject: Donation Winthrop and Lisenne Rockefeller of 3518 Hill Rd. Little Rock, AR 72205, have very graciously donated $10,000.00 to the instructional program of Pulaski Heights Middle School. They have requested that the money be allocated in the following manner: $1,000.00 for 8th grade English books, $1,000.00 for 7th grade English books, $1,000.00 for the Foreign Language Department, $4,000.00 for our library (one-half of this amount is to be spent on upper level AR books), $1,000.00 for the Special Education Department, $1,000.00 for 8th grade science classes, $500.00 for Math Counts, and $500.00 for Quiz Bowl. It is recommended that this very generous donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. ~  ~~ :' ::y~ i ~\n401 North Pine Street  Phone (501) 447-3200  Fax (501) 447-3201  L.ittle Rock , Arkansas 72205 To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: January 15, 2004 Re: Donations Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, P.O. Box 967, Little Rock, AR 72203, has generously donated school supplies and uniforms valued at $350.00 to Woodruff Elementary School. We sincerely appreciate this donation on behalf of the children of Woodruff. School counselor, Shirley Davi~, distributed the school supplies and uniforms to children who needed assistance. We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. RECEIVED LRSD ATHLETICS Fax:501-324-2119 Jan 4 2003 13:58 P.02 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Iii . ATHLETIC DIRECTOR-SECONDARY SCHOOLS II\\ January 5, 2004 To: . Darral Paradis, Director LRSD Procurement Department From: n I.JJ Johnny Johnson, CAA r ~7 Athletic Director LRSD Subject: Lockers and Mirrors Donation David Ensminger recently donated 124 metal gym lockers valued at $11,560 to the Little Rock School District which were installed at Forest Heights Middle School. Mr. Ensminger also donated 14 large mirrors valued at $3, 500 which will be placed in the weight room at Quigley Stadium. It is reconunended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the LRSD. 3615 West 25th Street*Little Rock, AR 72204*(501)447-2060 To: From: Subject: '.\n4n Individual Approach to a World efKnowledge\" Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management tf]lkJQrion E. Woods, Coordinator of Professional Development Donation of Books for the Mahlon Martin Professional Library Arkansas Democrat-Gazette donated educational books to the Mahlon Martin Professional Library. The value of the donation is $3,500.00. The contact information is as follows: Cynthia Howell Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 121 E. Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 DATE: February 26, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY,Mark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending January 31, 2004. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial conditi9n. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved None  Expectations of District NIA  Needed Staff NIA  Comments None  Recommendation Approval of the January 2004 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, ~PENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 01/31 /03 COLLECTED 2003/04 01/31 /04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681 ,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 7,923,699 99.05% 10,100,000 9,516,878 94.23% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 29,600,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 205,072 109.66% 210,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 174,515 45.33% 180,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 337,232 249.80% 150,000 206,062 137.37% MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 223,326 65.68% 380,000 231,195 60.84% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 90,653 32.96% 200,000 77,339 38.67% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 156,386 97.74% 240,000 166,872 69.53% TOTAL 97,432,000 66,258,663 68.01% 98,607,800 65,879,843 66.81% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 17,215 71 .73% 21 ,000 11 ,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 17,215 71.73% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE- STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 30,219,479 55.08% 53,226,139 29,447,876 55.33% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 3,891 ,937 51 .28% 8,300,000 3,373,820 40.65% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 644,552 48.10% 1,400,000 621 ,053 44.36% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 346,684 20.39% 1,675,000 271 ,285 16.20% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 205,407 75.14% 273,358 202,301 74.01% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 1,226,542 33.28% 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 1,396,152 42.76% 3,900,000 1,473,688 37.79% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 335,976 33.40% 920,337 368,337 40.02% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 658,607 100.00% 560,545 267,486 47.72% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 285,271 100.00% 285,245 142,623 50.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 57,386 8.83% 360,000 193,739 53.82% TOTAL 75,441,106 39,267,993 52.05% 74,776,187 37,606,049 50.29% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 13,857 1.23% 1,350,000 141,308 10.47% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 554,813 33.33% 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% TOTAL 3,410,671 568,670 16.67% 3,752,430 685,451 18.27% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,777 106, 112,540 60.19% 177,157,418 104,182,938 58.81% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25, 152,981 7,262,743 28.87% 24,075,790 10,010,008 41 .58% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,082,476 52.32% 4,000,000 2,398,316 59.96% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 9,210,250 36.74% 24,689,351 9,322,338 37.76% TOTAL 54,198,923 18,555,469 34.24% 52,765,141 21,730,662 41.18% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 124,668,008 54.08% 229,922,559 125,913,600 54.76% - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 AND 2004 - APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 2002/03 01 /31 /03 EXPENDED 2003/04 01 /31/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES -SALARIES 100,865,586 51 ,391 ,118 50.95% 100,684,982 46,716,574 46.40% BENEFITS 24,838,361 12,739,832 51 .29% 26,483,772 12,288,907 46.40% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 9,845,498 49.74% 19,719,297 9,320,130 47.26% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 4,087,172 48.97% 8,185,459 5,169,777 63.16% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 781 ,770 48.35% 1,575,580 630,412 40.01% OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 2,903,848 34.13% 8,384,567 2,968,136 35.40% DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 12,213,572 99.97% 12,098,342 12,191 ,763 100.77% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176,189,538 93,962,810 53.33% 177,131,999 89,285,698 50.41% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 7,478,349 28.60% 26,056,193 8,419,292 32.31% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 1,723,548 43.31% 4,000,000 2,306,955 57.67% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 11,415,683 45.54% 24,689,351 10,577,444 42.84% TOTAL 55,194,668 20,617,580 37.35% 54,745,544 21,303,691 38.91% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 114,580,390 49.52% 231,877,543 110,589,388 47.69% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 10,087,617 (1 ,954,984) 15,324,211 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 (416,671) 1,578,177 3,985,551 OPERATING 8,675,891 20,707,381 9,052,274 23,924,095 TOTAL 9,325,586 20,290,710 10,630,451 27,909,647 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 01-31-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 33,282.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,501.92 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 62,375.74 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 246,791.00 10,141,400.20 7,434,812.30 1,285, 123.90 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 2,650.68 39,623.29 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 7,679.00 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 2,108,630.36 2,265,578.88 514,549.29 2,097,082.00 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 166,300.00 11,338,379.23 9,779,114.60 10,355,312.76 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 945,917.47 3,353.37 1,385,748.40 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 2,608,721.36 24,763,981.20 17,731,829.56 15,242,507.54 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (2,608,721.36) 19,465,877.87 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 893,210.83 8,181,987.72 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 894,210.83 (2,608,721.36) 0.00 0.00 29,392,571.58 GRAND TOTAL II ~!lZ lllD llZ llll!l ~lD II\n! ~ ~!l Z\n! ~Ill ~g lZnl !l~ll li !l!lZ!lli m D!l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY - THRU THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004 -- - - PROJECT ENDING f------- ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 01-31-04 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 THRU 01-31-04 THRU 01-31-04 SUBTOTAL 01-31-04 - -- - - ADMINISTRATION 673,846.55 889,772.32 (485,325.77) 149,597.63 62,375.74 0.00 616,419.92 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS 35,565,851.80 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 10,141,400.20 7,434,812.30 34,280,727.90 1,285,123.90 SECURITY PROJECTS 265,814.17 113,930.47 109,609.73 2,650.68 0.00 226,190.88 39,623.29 - LIGHTING PROJECTS 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 7,679.00 0.00 4,861,214.57 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 13,342,240.87 ~ 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,265,578.88 514,549.29 11,245, 158.87 2,097,082.00 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,655,707.04 --397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 11,338,379.23- 9,779,114.60 41,300,394.28 10,355,312.76 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 11,735,611.7-8 - 575,016.53 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 945,917.47 3,353.37 10,349,863.38 1,385,748.40 - - - - -~-- - UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 20,759,698.84 20,759,698.84 -- - - - - ~ TOTAL 138,882,176.18 5,852,669.42 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 24,763,981 .20 17,731,829.56 102,879,969.80 36,002,206.38 -- - - - - ~ - - - - - - f- - - c- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - I l,l~Ul,\u0026amp;nnl\"nW y I ~t\\Ul1.n,r.:au \"VI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND --- --- - FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31 , 2004 I Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 01 -30-04 TFN Bank of America 0.850% Repo 2,735,000.00 Operating 01 -15-04 03-15-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,004,986.08 Operating 12-19-03 02-02-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% - CD 9,500,000.00 Operating 12-19-03 02-13-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,000,000.00 Operating 12-19-03 03-01-04 Twin City Bank 1.400% CD 9,600,000.00 Total - 31 ,839,986.08 - - Food Service 01 -27-04 TFN Bank of America 0.720% Repo 810,000.00 810,000.00 - Activity Fund 01-16-04 TFN Bank of America 0.780% Repo 1,200,000.00 Total 1,200,000.00 - - Bond Account 09-08-03 03-08-04 Regions 1.094% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01 -16-04 07-14-04 Metropolitan 1.930% - - CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 07-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.400% CD 5,231 ,393.21 Capital Projects Fund 10-15-03 02-13-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 5,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31005 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 - Capital Projects Fund 11-18-03 04-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.300% CD 6,000,000.00 - Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 08-16-04 USBANK 1.420% CD 11,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 01-16-04 06-10-04 Bank of America 0.910% _ Treasury Bills 5,365,126.36 Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 05-14-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.360% CD 9,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 12-01-03 05-03-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 3,060,648.33 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-03 03-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.430% CD 10,221 ,001 .82 Capital Projects Fund 01-26-04 TFN Bank of America 0.810% Repo 5,740,000.00 Total 64,119,348.75 Deseg Plan Scholarship 12-05-03 06-15-04 Bank of America 1.020% - Treasury Bills 668,325.28 Total - 668,325.28 Rockefeller Scholarship 01-15-04 . 06-10-04 Bank of America --- 0.910% - T reasury Bills 252,059.89 Total 252,059.89 - Risk Management Loss Fund 01 -30-04 TFN Bank of America 0.250% Repo 400,000.00 400,000.00\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_241","title":"Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part one","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Educational planning","School buildings"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities, part one"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/241"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["112 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n2004-05 TaskF orceto J oinCt ommitteoen E ducationFaalc ilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www.arkansaslacililies.com Arkansas School Administrators: During the summer of 2004, a team of architects and engineers assessed every school in Arkansas. This assessment was a extensive effort involving nearly 1,200 schools, 6,000 buildings and more than 84 million square feet of space. The intent of the assessment was to identify the condition of school facilities in Arkansas and to determine their adequacy. The following report includes the assessment data and summarizes deficiencies for each facility. This study required the efforts of more than 300 people and includes over a million points of data entry. Each school was pre-assessed to identify buildings and review the scope of the assessment. Next the assessment team visited each and every building, completing pre-printed forms related to building condition. Those forms were then entered into a database that held all the condition data. This data was used to prepare each school report. The purpose of distributing this report is to gather district input on the assessment data and improve upon accuracy. Revisions will be incorporated into the database and revised reports will be developed. While these reports have been through several rounds of quality assurance and review, it is possible that some of the infonnation could include misinterpretation on the part of the assessment team. It is important that each school district report via e-mail to the Task Force project coordinator any major discrepancies within the report. Thank you for taking the time to assist in this effort. It is the intention of the Task Force to evolve the assessment into a permanent database for school facilities in the state. School facilities are continually changing. For example, a deficiency identified in July may have been repaired in September\nthe use of buildings may change\nas buildings age, new problems develop\nand new schools are always being built. We need your input to continue to improve the database and assist the legislature in identifying funding mechanisms that will assist the districts in upgrading their facilities. Contained within the report are two types of data. Factual data includes items such as age, size, and school enrollment. Subjective data is based on the professional opinion of the planners, architects, and engineers involved in the assessment. Much of the subjective infonnation contained in these reports is based on a set of assumptions necessary to ensure a consistent approach. These assumptions can be found in the draft Arkansas School Facilities Manual and are based on state and national indexes. Key assumptions used in developing the reports include: I. The condition of the building is based on a point in time, approximately July 2004. Changes or improvements since that time have not been included. 2. The use of the building is based on the 2003-2004 school year. 3. All buildings will be brought up to proposed building system standards. 4. Current state guidelines for student/teacher ratios were maintained. 5. Cost estimates are in 2004 dollars and were based on an average cost-per-square-foot to construct a particular school type. Cost estimates were also adjusted for the location of the facifil\u0026gt;: within the state. Repair estimates use the nationally recognized RS Means Facilities Cost Data to estimate repair costs at the time of assessment. 6. The enrollment and use of buildings to calculate educational suitability cost were based the 2003- 2004 school year. 7. The space requirements for school facilities were based on the space guidelines in the draft Arkansas School Facility manual. 8. The number of current school buildings and school districts would remain the same. Consideration for any future consolidation was not included. 9. Alternative uses of facilities for the purpose of generating income, reducing operating expenses, or reducing capital expenditures were not estimated or incorporated. 10. Additional space for growing districts was accounted for, but no credit was taken for declining districts. TaskF orcteo J oinCt ommitteoen E ducationFaalc ilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www . .1rk.1ns.Jsf:1cilities~com 11. Additional square footage for schools that do not meet proposed educational suitability standards was added, but no credit was taken for schools that exceeded space standards. 12. Temporary/portable buildings were not included in total available square footage. 13. School buildings used for educational purposes where evaluated on a comprehensive level, while administrative and athletic buildings that are not used for academic purposes were evaluated on a summary level. The deficiencies listed on the attached sheets were based on: 1. Assessors' identification of items needing repair or replacement. 2. Assessors' identification of systems exceeding their life expectancies. It should be noted that even if a system has exceeded its life expectancy it still may be in working condition\nhowever, life cycle models would suggest these systems require repair or replacement in the near future. Since this report envelops several years of potential implementation efforts, these costs have been included. The cost ofrepairing or replacing systems was based on RS Means Facilities Cost Data. RS Means is a nationally recognized company that collects construction costs across the country and categorizes them by division and major class for all types of school construction. The company averages these costs to a national standard and provides regional adjustment factors to apply the cost locally. With repair or replacement of any system, there is a wide variety of solutions that will impact the cost. However, for budgeting purposes, the assessment team identified the most logical correction and a cost estimate was developed for budgeting purposes. A facility assessment should not be confused with a building repair or renovation program. The focus of the assessment was to determine adequacy of school facilities and an order of magnitude estimate to correct inadequacy. This information can be helpful in determining a repair or renovation program but additional master planning at the building and school level is necessary. For example, if a building needs a new roof, lighting, and an addition, there are several options concerning which type of roof is best for that location, as well as how that roof will be replaced in conjunction with lighting retrofits and phasing of new construction. When it comes to interior lighting, once lighting is replaced, it is not uncommon to replace the ceiling and may also be cost effective to update the electrical service in a building even if the assessment did not call for replacement at this time. If a building needs an addition, analysis will be required to determine the most appropriate design solution. There may be a need for additional classrooms, but the existing building may have an undersized library. Therefore, it may make the most sense to convert the existing library to classrooms and build a new library/media center. All of these decisions impact cost. An assessment is not a building program or master plan. An assessment provides the basic information regarding existing deficiencies and lifecycle data which can be used to compare the relative condition from one school to another. An assessment is needed in developing a master plan but in itself does not denote such. In conclusion, this report is an assessment to identify school facility inadequacy and an order of magnitude estimate of the cost to correct these inadequacies. It will be used by the state legislature to determine funding formulas and mechanisms for addressing these education inadequacy issues. Thank you again for your review of these reports. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the project coordinators listed on the following page, or simply log on to www.arkansasfacilitics.com to submit comments electronically. 2 Region TaskF orceto JointC ommitteoen EducationaFla cilities 4100 Richards Road North Little Rock, AR 72117 Phone: 501-371-1543 Fax: 501-683-0517 www.arkansasfacilities.com 1 \u0026amp; 4 [N. West, Ozarks, N. Central, N. East, Crolwy's Ridge, Great Rivers] Brett Kingrey 501-371-1572 2 \u0026amp; 3 [Western, Arch Ford, DeQueen/Mena, S. West, S. Central] Aliza Jones 501-371-1571 5 [Pulaski, Wilbur D. Mills] Drew Coppock 501-371-1522 6 [Dawson, Arkansas River, South East] Stan Leek 501-371-7727 Task Force to Joint Committee on Educational Facilities Scott Copas, Chairman 3 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site 111, Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Site El I HVAC Deficiency Sidewalk requires replacement Fence/Gate (Chain Link) requires replacement I'ra,1ii\n~: ~ ~ulirm r01:1Ia ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant AP - ~le ~e\u0026amp; b~n bU !1 I !fi - ell m:itfi I , lilCIIT111n ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not full com liant Playfield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement Playfield Equip (Pre-K to 1st) requires re lacement School has insufficient football/soccer fields. School has insufficient baseball fields. Computer room lacks independent AC. Electrical Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parking \u0026amp; Road is missin and is needed Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Specialties School lacks a dedicated computer equipment S ec\n1111,11 Specialties School's PBX is undersized. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02775-002 02820-003 0 QZ 59541 59543 (,13:,\"\"\n!13 337830 340889\n- I 337832 340890 02880-009 59528 02880-012 59530 EA-007 107457 EA-008 108361 JS?fll~ EA-025 110713 16520-001 59544 EA-033 113254 EA-024 110088 11 ii Ii tl EA-030 112098 Qty UOM Priority 1,000 SF 100 LF LS LS LS LS 3 Ea. 10 Ea. Ea. Ea. LEa. 6 Ea. Ea. 150 SF Ea. 2 2 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ l 4 $ 2 $ $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4,853 2,167 ii 5,850 2,106 ::di I 702 3,510 114,817 237,650 34,649 32,188 II\\ 13,636 10,063 20,411 24,660 ~fiil 17,550 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated l:stimsl:ll Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated fbi Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Es lrn3l!!d Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 1 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School SubTotal by Building 22 $ Building: Administrative Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Roofing Elastomeric Membrane Roofing requires 07530-003 59434 3,100 SF 2 $ 'E:~ I l~W-9ft!~~f\u0026amp;.~~4~~1iftJlf~lfffl Exterior Interior I 1 ,1 Interior Interior il'IL'!!:rie,, Interior Interior ln1eno1 Interior Interior lnlerior HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing PIIJ ng Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 322085 1 LS 2 $ Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is $ needed  V ei:il\nnl Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement otl\u0026lt;I tc et requrl'B! -Pi.,aew nl Panic Device requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant Aoi:i- RClcrr11:lfrnqJ1utie~l 0 9 ~ llil lr,I 1cgm ii ngf ! ~ gorn ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Custom Cabinet requires replacement C1u11 li?!flo,pH !filulre1! re,ila1:S'1ile\u0026lt;1t Classroom ventilation inadequate End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement E,,d\n:if f._.,fatF su~ela encl c'lUl,rac:r aqulre rellilaml!nl='nt ADA- Lavatoryis notf ullyc ompliant 08710-001 59438 ~lS 09130-003 59436 09510-003 59437 - 4J1l 59440 321690 -JB9i 321694 06410-003 59441 DI! -0:)3 .IM 15830-001 59431 15700-902 310401 15100-907 299488 15100-908 299494 ll DD .D!I 8~ 335268 2 Ea. ,oo ~ 84 SF 100 SF 2 Ea. 8 4 3,090 3,090 3,090 LS IS LS LF LI\" Room SF SF SF Ea LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 549,024 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 28,127 Estimated u~ E:.s. d 1,446 Estimated 10,986 Estimated I 1 Lil ralj\nd 201 Estimated 342 Estimated .a Es~tna!Ecl 1,776 Estimated 116 Estimated ~ Eslimel!tl 347 Estimated 4,249 Estimated \"'f.! E!i1 40,655 Estimated 27,829 Estimated 3,333 Estimated 7,231 Estimated 11':Q!i E3Il,mued 116 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 2 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Administrative Floor# Room# System Electrical El :...ri\"\"C:.il Electrical Electrical Deficiency GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed tlFI I:'! i 1111111,1 r\"I L Ic  ~d End of life: Electrical Service requires replacement End of Life: Lighting Fixtures require replacement T11i\nh I~ Cl~  ~  C!l1 W1 - \" 11 r!lfl uire, r!!!lliaei!n11B11t Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed = \u0026amp;f\n!t~ HmrtlqlrPbe rr1115islan, r~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed r :Sat e Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant im\u0026gt;!!f ~ req = re,-lar. Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communications require replacement Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Roofing ~i'i I r!IJ Roofing Roofing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement iing requI= rt!!]lscement. Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 16140-001 59423 1 1 ~ 001 5~2\". 16400-901 299489 16500-900 299491 i 67ll'9D 299MQ 13910-001 59425 13910-004 59426 :ti! lu-lJ \" J 13910-022 59429 13910-025 59430 l:ffl!lll!.Sll1 :~~c:.o 13850-900 299493 321696 lOISS- 11130-901 299496 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 59555 01:i {1-0IB -g,~1\n07510-003 59376 07510-003 59412 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. 3,090 SF 2,080 SF  9 .'\nr- 4 Ea. 3 Ea. 4 Ea. 8 Ea. 1,~ll 3,090 SF 1 LS 3,090 SF 36 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 3 $ $ Qty UOM Priority 2,058 SF 2 $ -ill I ' 4,760 SF 2 $ 4.760 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 271 n1 13,104 8,097 1,114 783 I I. 1,109 2,630 .,Jl!ll!- 4,357 57 OCIE 3,469 205,802 Estimated EstimsieG Estimated Estimated \u0026amp;.,-f,- Estimated Estimated E!lrima d Estimated Estimated im\ni Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 16,331 37,772 37,772 Estimated E 11111~ Estimated Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 3 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Aluminum Window (Awning) requires replacement 08520-003 59554 1,025 SF 2 $ 58,083 Estimated Exterior ADA-Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 335254 1 LS 2 $ 6,781 Estimated ~e!!ID Exterior Exterior {l!ri'vr Exterior Exterior Ill! Exterior Exterior Eueri' Structural Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 SI .. [J I r \"' I ttili,gJ r~u[rei, [(!f)laCOl't-l I ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ADA End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant I ,,r,:i eslarn. re1JlrM r!!lllallS\u0026gt;m!n Soffit requires replacement  ll'iC! ~ I' COn:lploiil'I ADA - Stairs are not fully compliant Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed A I \" r I ,, I!!] mis.\u0026amp; f11,la (l,!lj  Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 1,eede ,u ll [)r:u:1Q cie - l1e111i\ni!Hi~!p . nel!ded Ceramic Tile requires replacement ntJ I AcousticaSl uspensionre quiresr eplacement tlll I lJ-OOli! 593'11 321681 08110-006 59375\nt~:l,9 08100-900 299487 332045 .\n,941\u0026gt;1 07460-001 59482 07 460-002 59483 ,\n2 _!l 335260 08710-001 59563 OS ,Q-001 51.1!1 08710-001 08710-001 59381 59417 09310-002 59556 09648-003 59557 09130-003 59559 6 6 1 w~ 600 275 8 -\n_ 130 475 8,515 Eii LS 2 $ Ea. 2 $ l!..S -. Door 2 $ LS 2 $ SF 2 $ SF 2 $ _.\nLS 2 $ Ea. $ ~\" Ea. $ Ea. $ E SF 2 $ SF 2 $ SF 2 $ ,0 EE,jm3j 1,932 Estimated 11,014 Estimated Esbm..i= 20,656 Estimated 1,920 Estimated IIS!'i E,\nimeL 11 2,980 Estimated 2,485 Estimated :'.'I i,-~d 5$1 2,340 Estimated 43,945 Estimated I0,,.m.l l:.!iilrnBlsd 5,493 Estimated 5,493 Estimated o. E'!c al'!?d 1,738 Estimated 5,225 Estimated 20,345 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Bern. School 3090 Page 4 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 09510-003 59560 fir!~~1~j~~:'~ft~~r!e~A~~ ff,,JftJe!i~Jl'\u0026amp;'t~tktgftt~i~1~::~ab-i~iip~,tt~\n',~ Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 59565 Interior In, -~r Interior Interior Interior Interior tl\\T ,D Interior Interior lnranor Interior Interior I ter1or Interior Interior 1111rl Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Handrail/Railing is missing and is needed M~--A C1Jmf!Yilnl I le llilJel 1ocm9 all!! n t II~ ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not full com liant VCT flooring requires replacement Lock/Latchset requires replacement ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant AliJI -1\\c.ce!'.s.all\\!l 'lllel-1D fJiil/alSra r,a \"1.illy edttlp1t,i l Ceramic Tile requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement Al'.IA-fiioomd ime :.Ian 1.8~ este ~ 11k: lill!!J fMl'fl ls. not fLlW'jl lllf1111phar11 ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant ..,\"\"\"'mltT s re~ r s r 111 :i:im~ VCT flooring requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 05520-001 59572 ~Olill 335257 335259 09658-009 59351 08710-012 59356 ~ ~ 321683 332022 ..,B~tl27 09310-002 59377 09658-009 59378 '.12\\5 1:l~ 321687 322078 ~!i1 Oil 5141 09658-009 59414 332051 Qty 8,515 ~ 8 10 2,885 8 96 3.730, 9G 2.511 1 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status SF 2 $ 29,072 Estimated I ,11 111I1i f Ea. 2 $ 7,104 Estimated LF 2 $ 234 Estimated LS i ,J\n!7 EsiIIITTBIO LS 2 $ 543 Estimated LS 2 $ 3,391 Estimated SF 2 $ 14.304 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 4,905 Estimated Ea 2 1.TrE'i c:a~ LS 2 $ 3,090 Estimated LS 2 $ 154 Estimated LSi 4!1.1 ~ mall!!l\nj SF 2 $ 1\n283 Estimated SF 2 $ 18,493 Estimated LS ::! .P77 E~\" 'il~ LS 2 $ 461 Estimated LS 2 $ 153 Estimated $i' '\nI $ 1-\ni Em. ,:j SF 2 $ 12,450 Estimated LS 2 $ 153 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 5 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cyde Status In' r Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 332063 LS 2 $ 461 Estimated compliant Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement 09130-003 59485 300 SF 2 $ 717 Estimated I t\"'fl Oeiln-9 11!':l!eJ, . rt,fll- 119:ilO ):f .'j[l T .u s- 2 in m11mi11 Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 59491 8 Ea. 2 $ 4,905 Estimated Interior Panic Device requires replacement 08710-015 59493 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,776 Estimated lril , r lo Jl2fill2 l..s .:! ~1 Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 332071 LS 2 $ 170 Estimated Interior ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 332077 LS 2 $ 1,061 Estimated room is not full com liant 405 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197761 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 406 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197762 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 01 11\\111 011 i loo I E 'lh~ a,i,1~1!-iiii 1 Jnfl \u0026amp;.4l\nJ H~ IUJJ -='lmalE:: 501 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201820 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 202 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179023 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated (1~ IPll!!!I 31\n.,-o  m rloo, acits ii P~flr1 -, \"1.111 ~I,  l.l(tl G!~I '\" 1,, l.='d 404 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197763 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 401 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197764 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated \" Ii ~t CJa\u0026amp;\u0026amp;mom doo~ la~ lhe, !,J ,1 . ., ~ - fmMoJ 503 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201822 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 504 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179020 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated t,(llf 1,,1r1 ,-r -a~r!I -1::t1aa1Nare_ E.A-Oilfl ,~ J. E..c\n:1nm11ed 402 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 179022 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated 402 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 197765 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E@. Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 6 of 18  State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01120/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59562 24  Ea. 3 $ 17,050 Estimated Interior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 59353 840 SF 3 $ 2,469 Estimated ~~j~iJ~{\n~Jt~f~ill~\u0026amp;~~W411~-~lii!~,~t~l11~lt~lf~i'1fi8~~4f4- Interior Paint/Coating requires replacement 09910-002 59379 5,636 SF 3 $ 4,814 Estimated Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59380 12 Ea. 3 $ 8,525 Estimated i-1 110!' r. r I I u nea Interior Interior lrt\\ fl Interior Interior rnfE'-ior Interior Interior HVAC HVAC IV HVAC HVAC HVAC A.P.P.L.E @, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Paint/Coating requires replacement Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement u C\"ab ei: ran ,- rn~a~m Countertop requires replacement Countertop needs minor repairs Cu m C.ilhin l or\nUli\"' 1.\np1a1:E411rml Custom Cabinet requires replacement Countertop requires replacement Exhaust Fan - Restroom 4800 CFm 2 H.P. is missing and is needed Classroom ventilation inadequate lail n F-!Qtrs1c l.!pla rn,in! End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split D/X Unit requires re lacement End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement 09910-002 08210-007 06415-003 06415-002 +1, !J{IO~ 06410-003 06415-003 I 18JMIDI! 15830-002 15830-001 15800-900 15700-902 15800-900 t, 59416 5,498 59489 8 ~ 59568 14 59382 16 !iQ ~ . - 59495 8 59497 8 ~J~' .. 59574 2 59575 3 5~ ,..mi 299463 4,127 310398 4,127 299472 4,109 9F\nill!lil SF 3 $ 4,696 Estimated Ea. 3 $ 5,684 Estimated IF .,,. . 7 l:\n,111\n,L,,ij LF 4 $ 654 Estimated LF 4 $ 758 Estimated LT _ _I __ .imB.llE!i:I LF 4 $ 4,249 Estimated LF 4 $ 374 Estimated E: il,1 6!ilimalc I Ea. 2 $ 7,618 Estimated Room 2 $ 30,525 Estimated  ~Tl 2.T ~ 11TH tt SF 2 $ 20,032 Estimated SF 2 $ 37,168 Estimated SF 2 $ 19,944 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 7 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units- Split DIX 15700-902 310399 il~tMfJtiiii\nii,iiji11EJZi~~If~ll:11l~1~19i HVAC End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires 15800-900 299480 replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units- Split D/X 15700-902 310400 HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing fllnl! Plumbing Plumbing 111111b1, Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Unit uires re lacement End of Life: Controls - DDC requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit uires re lacement End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement  End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement E ~ fl.ifi Ji: l.:r - Ip !l S:):~ , yl,g1 Ill ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Grall 891 is rne\nng. an IF n End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System requires replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System uires replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Sanitary Sewer requires replacement 15900-902 15700-902 15400-900 15100-908 $,\\\\ 15400-900 15100-907 299500 310402 299456 299457 J.9 ~ 321679 322072 _j :l.5!1 299464 299466 332033 15100-907 299474 322082 15100-908 299484 Qty UOM 4,109 SF Rs:!EJm 4,102 SF 4,102 SF 4,537 SF 4,537 SF 26 Ea. 14,489 SF . ' ~ LS LS ~ 15 Ea. 4,127 SF LS 4,109 SF LS 4,102 SF Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 \"$ 37,006 Estimated c ,t\u0026gt;b~ Ifft 1, 2 $ 19,910 Estimated 2 $ 36,943 Estimated 2 $ 9,007 Estimated 2 $ 40,861 Estimated 2 $ 31,900 Estimated 2 $ 33,907 Estimated IL,1!31 In, 2 $ 4,882 Estimated 2 $ 543 Estimated ~ 2 $ 18,404 Estimated 2 $ 4,452 Estimated 2 $ 154 Estimated 2 $ 4,433 Estimated 2 $ 153 Estimated 2 $ 9,599 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 8 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 403 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. l'I~ Cilasaror:,m t: lll/1 \"'3QII number ~i~~ 406 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 501 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. I~ I? \"'1llli111 :ilk:!:. Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed l!C l::jl r\nA R~t=t, 1  -1 and ~:.n. ecll~cl Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed ji,\n.11 G~I ~rJlln.t~ ,., !!!Salga \u0026amp; nEEdEii Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed l:ieqrjc 0f llacii ,a rn1 ~ntJ a - II rl Electrical GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed Electrical End of Life: Electrical Seivice requires replacement Electrical Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD  10820-004 59479 15400-900 299498 335270 EA-064 257410 - 'II,. ,., 1 EA-064 257412 EA-064 257413 5!!.-llE' :C51\\I 16140-001 59577 16140-001 59579 ~ 4ft U(ll ~9.13ii1'1 16140-001 59362 16140-001 59384 ~r, 4,Jl, tlf11 !il!!J 16140-001 59404 16140-001 59406 i!i1~D, i'iQ.1,7~ 16140-001 59472 16520-007 59578 16400-901 299462 16520-007 59361 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 Ea. 2 $ 669 Estimated 13 Ea. 2 $ 15,950 Estimated LS 2 $ 170 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated l:ia. \u0026amp;7!! Eli 1ml Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ti E ~rttii~d 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated '\n31 Eslim~rl. 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated ~ Er\n: -\n2 Ea. $ 271 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated E3:. 71 [ii\n,ii ll 4 Ea. $ 542 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated 14,489 SF 2 $ 1,897 Estimated 2 Ea. 2 $ 1,032 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 9 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Electrical Electrical Deficiency Exterior Light - Walkway is missing and is needed Electrical Electrical Med~ C Elacini::aJ End of Life: Electrical Service requires replacement Exterior Light - Walkway is missing and is needed Room i\nai\n11151.1~11c1t 1 103 lll:l 102 102 10 101 104 1\n14. 201 201 :a 202 301 - 1 302 302 Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide Telephones require replacement Technology Room has insufficient dataports. l ed-lBDI 1 Ro11m Bells ll!!IE!llhOOI! n11,. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology I 11!'11!\\Q:,\u0026gt; Room lacks telephone wiring. nitt 111ll ffi~emd 21ai00rtsc, Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. E011!Wl109''1R' ocm~ !El~ on wir,1,g, Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. I ., limil~~ Rvom 111e n5utf nt Qaf.apPrl.s. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T ' hi I'll '~ I I llm I  ,.,,, fjhQll'lt n~g. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16520-004 59386 16400-901 2994 73 16400-901 16520-004 v.,..n1e 299481 59471 n~ 16700-900 299453 EA-022 129888 E-IYR 162\u0026amp; EA-022 129889 EA--027 I: 162526 U'.ll!lg!J EA-027 162523 EA-022 129887 EA- ' 7 tti:2:M EA--022 129895 EA-027 166848 M, 1 .9gg5 EA-027 166849 EA-022 129891 1oi\nin$ EA-022 129892 EA-027 152406 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. 4,109 SF 4,102 SF 3 Ea. Eil. 14,489 SF 3 Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. E~ Ea. 3 Ea. l:\n1 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 -4 $ $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ :4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,528 13,104 13,104 3,673 Oil 7,137 542 l!iT 542 167 7 i 167 542 Hi1 542 167 167 542 16? 361 167 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ,1,r,11 1ti.:d Estimated Estimated ~ITitJ ' Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E:s'J!1al.i!d Estimated Estimated I 1111I1 I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 10 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20(2005 Deficiency Code AssesslO Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 303 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152407 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 304 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129894 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ~ an l.52!l\u0026lt;O\u0026lt;l 1er ~~Ima.I 203 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129897 3 Ea .. 4 $ 542 Estimated 203 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 166850 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated llil er:hnt! Qg~ R-ottri h r\"'5Uffig~ !11~ al~~ - 0~ -,-ge~r, E, 4 m 204 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 166847 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 403 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152399 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated ~ T!!ehf\\'lll.:. \".!m ~ tmJ, 1 ,I I !!I' JJU 1T Im, ti 406 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129883 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 406 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152397 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated :o,\noona 'I Rmirn ll in I I l dia, ptl\\19, A I lit!!-' .. 501 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170280 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 202 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129900 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,ma Tl!lci1111 ~ ~\nI 1 - pt1011'1Nei1 ng. -1!1:_li' 70'Ul1 7~7 E$g~li!llj 404 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129884 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 404 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152402 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated D1 11 ci1 t.ii,ll},\u0026gt;' nt c:leleoort~, ~ IYl' 1'9llE!!: .I. 2 Estimm d 401 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152403 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 503 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129901 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Ull -edi!nDI ~:r Rrn\nim ~, Md 1, ph II win , l:.A~7 11'112~ E\n.. 117 504 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129902 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 504 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170283 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 4u_ T __ na - _y l~mm hBS In, ffii\nI r ! lllp , ~ T2BIIW ~lli l5!si L:11 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 11 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 402 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Media Cer Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. ~ l!' \u0026amp; Sef~ Eia~rn,yP .:a fir! l!!t1\u0026lt;:.yu !j , t! r1169tf1aDf'd\n,s n~e Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed  Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 11 ~r,31, ..:. 1?1 Dl:\nW3e/\u0026lt;11~ rll J) lrtg .tnd ~ 11_ _ 0,!'fj Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires \"' laici!mi!!,I Fl~ \u0026amp; Slif11 El:i-J- ,r p - ,, I 9einq' Ll1J~i ~ m Ir ,d l!t fl j Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed ,., 5:.al-ly 113 dett ie mf:ssin\nmli Iii , I! _ I Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement t r,, g S3fety 8'o :af Lie: Sncwncy:\n11JII l'J!Pl~c,.e-, n Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed !l liiar.ot~ 11 n/51 111~1 11d1 1111ae~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed I , \" .i tety E ::1o l Life F11\u0026lt;A1la rm mqUI/CS\" rillK\u0026gt;ernenr Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Security System requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-027 152398 EA-027 152401 ,:w u,, , BG 13910-019 59581 13910-022 59582 L 5!l[l liS ~ 13850-900 299454 13850-901 299461 l!lll 511383 13910-004 59364 13910-019 59365 s_ 1m 13910-025 59367 13850-900 299468 _ tu 13910-001 59388 13910-004 59389 u 10. . ~ - 90 13910-022 59391 13910-025 59392 Ii! 'ilt 7f\n, 13850-901 299477 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3 F..::.. I 7 ll5illlflilii!a 8 Ea. $ 2,967 Estimated 6 Ea. $ 1,664 Estimated ~., a faii111 14,489 SF $ 20,431 Estimated 14,489 SF $ 27,607 Estimated E~ 1,,M 4 Ea. $ 1,044 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,484 Estimated ' m Eslfmulnd 4 Ea. $ 1,315 Estimated 4,127 SF $ 5,820 Estimated ~ ...::f 7 , E\u0026lt;slimalt!rl 4 Ea. $ 1,114 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,044 Estimated ,\\ Ba .. 11l1!Jl 1h I 11 ' 4 Ea. $ 1,109 Estimated 4 Ea. $ 1,315 Estimated IIJ E\nfrnal d 4,109 SF $ 7,829 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 12 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority 13910-001 59407 4 Ea. 1 ~tt~!~Kt,a~\u0026amp;Jk~IE4.tJ~--~-tiJli-~1~$'9~l4 I II Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 59409 Ea. Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fir II SIi V Fj,,I  1( f 1 !'ii!41 (~ S:r-i,temr e11UI r I 111 Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed ,i I~ I LJISI lalion iJ. m i\n1n0 iloml I Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alarm requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safe.ly End cl Lilt!' ::i:~d.1'111~ Em~Wi-.ae fqll~ n Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Food Service Line is not fully compliant ~:rl'Ni i Specialties Specialties .Speciii\nll,s~ Specialties Specialties Jlr'\"IA S !!,\nii!!CIIISI.S-1 11 I fl! ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Afli!i.-Grao ll ra WI 111J\u0026amp;11 ,111a m 11m1 ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement Specialties Stage Curtain requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 L1i,1 er Llfi: Puo _aA C, -I mun~n- re 13850-900 5\\1--91]1 13910-001 13910-019 13910-025 13850-900 lit !'itt-!'01 lm.111:rJ 10430-003 11063-003 II [.I-IQ~ 299483 'i!~ ~ 59473 59474 W.il'!i 59476 299497 :ise !.:!1 321675 321677 .Jl' '75. 332016 335262 m 335266 321697 \"!.158: 59570 59571\n!. 51 4 4,102 SF '{] ~I 4 Ea. 4 Ea. \"' 4 Ea. 4,537 SF ~~7 9' 11 LS LS LS LS LS LS 10 Ea. 725 SF ' lill -31, 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 a Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status $ 1, 114 Estimated ~I caltl1llil~ $ 1,109 Estimated $ 5,784 Estimated ~, frf I ti $ 1,114 Estimated $ 1,484 Estimated 1100 E5till19J $ 1,315 Estimated $ 6,398 Estimated ll,5115 \"' lm.11,d $ 2,925 Estimated $ 2,925 Estimated --~ kn 12d $ 271 Estimated $ 77 Estimated 7  11111 r, $ 77 Estimated $ 85 Estimated $ 719 Estimated $ 6,956 Estimated .. ,:urr E'alif!l d 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 13 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 0112()(2()()5 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost life Cycle Status Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 . 59358 4 Ea. 3 $ 5,008 Estimated Specialties End of life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 299467 4,127 SF 3 $ 4,633 Estimated Specialties End of life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 299482 4,102 SF 3 $ 4,605 Estimated Communications require replacement Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 59498 6 Ea. 3 $ 7,511 Estimated IQ~ iSi,er::. I -~ ~ jfOO l~U E!!ii Kl 103 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229559 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240767 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated sto 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 125011 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 102 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213101 2 Ea. 4 $\" 1,905 Estimated 1D? S?SC11Bllies Room ha!\nne1i~ I, E_ll,-05[j 22.9!ili8 = ~ :1:,1vo ,,1,,,.\" 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240768 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283811 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated !l1 S~mcia.,i Fl\nicm lilw -.s _\n,,1 !!!~ Defft II Oil, i/lii Ea s 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213103 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 101 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229556 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 . Estimated Ill iipedallies Room lil~E\npjJ--p l'I' lllill\"l! EA-0ou 2-40765.l ~SC !isl r11,1iII mgs, 101 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283810 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 104 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213102 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated I) - - l!ie!= EM:15.5 n 57 -. 1D 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240766 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 14 of 18 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code Assessl0 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 104 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283809 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated rr,f~~\\ $pB~S:,i121!' Roorrr.,\nis\nr1sufii n, EAJ..~ ~\\3[19,l a. 1,'!116 c'!:tJm tea 201 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229550 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 201 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 242211 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated sto e. 202 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213092 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 202 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229548 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated Aolll cli!ii -sprnpr1alE amaunl1af I\" a\\-115!'1, \"2 21112 I'_ - ~E 202 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283802 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 301 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213099 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated  l ~flC!CG)ll1!lli f'i~,, Ill~ fl!wBJ,t i'.:Jcl.1:ioaid-arEB f1'F ~ ~ ~, EsLrm!et! 301 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240000 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 301 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283807 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated P.oam JI~ t1!tliffll::f$nWl U g \u0026lt;!Ill\u0026gt;. EA~ 2.L30Ba - 302 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229552 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 302 Specialties EA-058 240001 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 303 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213097 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 303 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229553 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 0~ ,5'peela I~ Rooml3C P?Tll~!'II m 111 ,II ,,,l11, EA-I.I _.-0002 ~.:'\n!. lrt l11d !iiQr.lql!L 303 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283808 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated 304 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213096 3 Ea. 4 $ 2.858 Estimated 0.0 ~a11c\nh mxm1, 11 !xis Bi 6 ~~- :! - 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 15 of 18 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 01/20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 304 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 240003 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 304 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283806 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated Speciallmli IClert 'l'ffltl ~ [1fj 2 l'!!J95 i\n- fl5ll ~ - 203 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229551 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 203 . Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-05B 242213 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated st 204 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213093 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 204 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229549 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated - , r:jlil ll!!l R~ l\ndlls .iirpn311 i:uiey~n af t!!f~n Ei =-1:, ,! ,l ,_ Est\nt\ntorage, 204 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 283804 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 403 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213089 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 403 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 2399B1 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 403 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-0B5 2B3797 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 15 S !iciBfiiBE HEllilITT ii n\u0026amp;U .rr\"\"'1bl'g.a,-aa \\ I I~ 9\\l 53 I a e-.\" 111r1 405 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229543 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 405 Specialties EA-058 239982 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated 406 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213091 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 406 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229542 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated {/Ii l)ecia]tie 6 ,_,1tJ3 E:Um 406 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-OBS 283798 20 SF Surf 4 $ 23B Estimated 501 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213105 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 6003 - Horner Adkins Elem. School 3090 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 16 of 1B State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficie11cy Deficiency Listing 01/'2012005 Deficie11cyC ode AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 501 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amou11ot f teacher EA-058 240337 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 202 202 404 404 401 01 503 Specialties Room has i11sufficie1w1tr iti11ga rea. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amou11ot f teacher storage. Specialties Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. pec1 be!IE appmprisl~ a,oolm c, I~ Specialties Specialties S dulll_ Specialties Bli11dsa re missi11go r i11p oor co11ditio11. Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. oorr, ~ p~~- , 11tJ.11r1.1lf1le sch r i!ll!O!!l!l~ Room has i11sufficie1t1atc kboard area. 503 Specialties 504 Specialties Room has insufficie11ta ckboard area. 504 Specialties 402 Specialties Room has insufficient writi11ga rea. 402 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. t\nec..al~B!, Roa..i 1-dl.s il~r QP I now ,t 04 !aimi\"! '5rdlilijlf!, Cafeteria Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. Cafeteria Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor conditio11. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-053 213104 EA-058 240338 EA-055 229545 - s '~!11':1,1 EA-085 283796 EA-055 229546 E~ 2l'i'ion EA-055_ 229563 EA-058 240339 EA-055 229562 EA-058 241826 EA-053 213088 EA-055 229547 ~!ffi ~- EA-020 118582 EA-085 283800 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated Estimated 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 1E\n,, ll !I 5-. ma r.d 20 SF Surf 4 $ 238 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated E, 4 1, Esmm,l:!!d Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,736 Estimated Ea 4 ,,Hi! l!!J\nI I I' Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 824 SF Surf 4 $ 9,788 Estimated 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 17 of 18 State of Arkansas 3090 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Campus: 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Deficiency Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Media Cer Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. i'l?J f l_i:4 pp!Qp IC ,.--71 in \"l ,,111~ I A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-053 213087 EA-055 229541 jl!il\u0026lt;ir!' SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM 2 Ea. 2 Ea. E:s 329 387 Priority 4 $ 4 $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated II, I E I l I 1,853,905 2,608,731 6003 - Homer Adkins Elem. School 3090 Page 18 of 18 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/2Al2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site Asphalt requires replacement 02740-002 59065 10,000 SF 2 $ 16,936 Estimated Site Sidewalk requires replacement 02775-002 59072 4,725 SF 2 $ 22,931 Estimated SI~ Ml\" J\\l\n:,\n~lbllB:ni1J!n1f1l' llrn 1:1artcinurg. aw.ilt\n. ll5'7U::l L:c :r,650 I I I I ID tiullu.n9 e,e twit~ !I' ~run~ JeJ1l Site ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 331434 LS 2 $ 2,106 Estimated Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 331527 LS 2 $ 702 Estimated compliant Site Playfield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement 02880-009 59067 4 Ea. 4 $ 153,089 Estimated Site 02880-012 59070 4 Ea. 4 $ 95,060 . Estimated Site School has insufficient football/soccer fields. EA-007 107479 Ea. 4 $ 34,649 Estimated Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA-008 108386 Ea. 4 $ 32,188 Estimated lt i.iln!\nff!r ..001 L:!\u0026amp;i'li 4 I ~r:J l:!slim2E_ Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 337874 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVAC Computer room lacks independent AC. EA-025 110739 Ea. 4 $ 13,636 Estimated foi\nlnllill ~ -al - rD'11iataJ f9r\nb,r,~ 'Ii. ll.Jru!.~1 \u0026amp;!I. , :11 1,,.,,t l Specialties Computer room lacks appropriate furniture. EA-026 111310 Ea. 4 $ 363 Estimated Specialties School's PBX is undersized. EA-030 112126 Ea. 4 $ 17,550 Estimated Sp I ~~ s iilllP~prr,i\"bz Wil'tifl1~1 El\n-Da I t\n,, b I Ill! I SubTotal by Building 18 $ 448,121 Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Sheet Metal Roofing requires replacement 07610-003 59078 31,080 SF 2 $ 254,935 Estimated 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01124/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing End of Life: Roofing System1 - 4-Ply Built-Up 07500-900 341650 1,902 SF 2 $ 16,770 Estimated Exterior Aluminum Window (Sliding) requires replacement 08520-017 59076 681 SF 2 $ 38,044 Estimated Exterior Aluminum Windows (Fixed Casement) requires 08520-018 59077 38 SF 2 $ 2,123 Estimated lacement Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is 08710-001 59091 2 Ea. $ 10,986 Estimated needed Interior VCT flooring requires replacement 09658-009 59079 26,912 SF 2 $ 133,430 Estimated 1-1, or V\\l::O~re.i- i,A gn T~i.JlmE reolaca.,ient o~,::so m fi~i.l:l \"25,'\ni27 - -,-1!: \u0026amp;\n:st)),1I .till Interior Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement 09510-003 59085 26,627 SF 2 $ 90,909 Estimated Interior Lock/Latchset requires replacement 08710-012 59093 48 Ea. 2 $ 29,428 Estimated 1, AfJ/1,,- I! 1\"1.w1I II r111~a 11na ~S!IJ,1J \"=' - ,Z'~ ~mat_rl Interior f,,JJA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet 335982 LS 2 $ 7,640 Estimated room is not fully compliant Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 335984 LS 2 $ 3,668 Estimated compliant 16 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199902 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 018 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199903 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated  l'.l l11fl!f10r C qgm do- faciis aAJ)roariaie re EA ffl!ll0i1 E,1.. 2 l!I 019 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199905 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 017 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199906 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated l)t3 111 .-01 il~-n.1m1 doer la,~ appro,Iin e h\nrf~ 1 @1,-D/~O ,gg~. l:a.. 1. . !!f 003 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 . 201508 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 005 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201509 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 001 I11!.!!tlar apfJI II ~ ~ !ail L) 1ii1 4a 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E @, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 2 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 0112412005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 009 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201511 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 101 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201512 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated :: I t.l~or iJl==m aoOI' t,,1i: af!Frn l!ltt, .,. J:A..[I .i.016'3 ea. 39 Ecr,,1111l,d 008 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199898 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 01 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 201507 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ill IMI r!Dr \"'\\ua,oornll l l:i  Hl51iJ.!l!'l ~:m Esilmsied 12 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199900 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 014 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 199901 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ol '\" arl::v :J an, 11 I II~ ~llilruprl Ill ,1w-11 -mm 1999t.17 Ea. ,! 5 4 - i=J.{1,11,t1!t 1 Interior Carpet requires replacement 09680-003 59081 2,568 SF 3 $ 7,548 Estimated Interior Wall Covering requires replacement 09720-003 59087 11,668 SF 3 $ 24,300 Estimated lnb~rfo, P.a1llllr.. Ir, /fi rfll! 005119-[IOO ~:lllllll I [J !,~ a Interior Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 08210-007 59090 50 Ea. 3 $ 35,521 Estimated Interior Custom Cabinet requires replacement 06410-003 59094 30 LF 4 $ 15,935 Estimated l~rl\" !Mi' 15-IID:I ~- IIG Ml Li- I fl 12:1\"\"1 HVAC Furnace requires replacement 15530-003 59103 10 Ea. 2 $ 29,320 Estimated HVAC Classroom ventilation inadequate 15830-001 59107 14 Room 2 $ 141,952 Estimated VN= EJ~~rk - 1--~ I sulalic!,f~1 ,ms IJ0.!155 ,32.6 Sf\" ~ I HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window 15700-900 310537 400 SF 2 $ 1,153 Estimated Units require replacement HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top 15700-901 310538 12,828 SF 2 $ 198,885 Estimated Units require replacement Plumbing Grab Bar is missing and is needed 10820-004 59113 8 Ea. 2 $ 2,677 Estimated Plumbing End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require 15400-900 300450 62 Ea. 2 $ 76,069 Estimated replacement 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 3 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24120115 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Plumbing ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant 333553 LS 2 $ 1,223 Estimated Plumbing ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant 335988 LS 2 $ 11,003 Estimated 01 I F'I - lritJ oom\n1i::l!!5\"p rr~aiar l:111~ EA iS/l11\n.5 L I~ I I I~ I 011 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257428 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,356 Estimated 16 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257422 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ti ~ Pt1mlll _ gn, 1~1:l,i fh I Ulr. TJU~r cF 1511\" ~~ .$74\\ll E\n,  II 1-,,111\\E11J 020 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257424 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 019 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257425 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated H lumbM!g l:::!iE!~rlJtltnl~ s lh=!r \u0026gt;llqu,ud nllmtl ~\"\"' li i l:3U111.0em 013 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257427 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 003. Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257415 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 007 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 257417 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 009 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257418 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 11:\u0026lt;,1 Plwn:,ing Jllo!!Eroon1.,\nCl\\J.s l'BIJUll\"ej umb r .:lfsr\nfn' E e- :.i:rn~fJ 102 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257420 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated 008 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. EA-064 257421 Ea. 4 $ 678 Estimated ~ ~I GF'1~ ~ 11111 ~ al I H.l I\u0026amp; - E:: Sstlhtakl!cl Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires 16400-901 300456 32,652 SF 2 $ 4,274 Estimated replacement Technology End of Life: Telephones - School Wide 16700-900 300454 32,652 SF 3 $ 16,083 Estimated Telephones uire re acement 011 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152639 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 16 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129908 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page4 of 8 State of Arkansas 3137 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 018 018 I 0 020 . 019 fl 017 017 1\n\\ 013 003 ,g~ 005 007 00!.I 101 102 ,n2 008 01 n 010 12 System Deficiency Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. T-eah I~,~ kf)fln\\ II 11,11 aia1'\" r Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T :h'll!I~ f\u0026lt;!Klm alll!, elepll 11[1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Tm -ooDl~'f Floomfui9 m~u I ~r d.11.Ji,:,rr Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. I l t\"1,i~ fwgrn ho. !m\nU - n , lBIB,ig_rtE Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. recrmo Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Te..hnolc r Ruortr locls t!!l~t, - 11111: . Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. ,i,til,\n,g~ fwgrn hi3.5 in!\nIJfiii,lsrn =a oru: Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \"\"\"'\"b, 1 lwtim _al\njq\nI\nI h\"'ll rl A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-022 129909 EA-027 152644 El ~a:_ !1.9\"1a EA-027 152645 EA-022 129911 E-Au 1:W II EA-022 129912 EA-027 152641 - ttJ2 1~i~ EA-027 152638 EA-027 152656 EA- 'I 1~ l EA-027 152657 EA-027 152652 1~ EA-027 152654 EA-022 129904  r 1.\u0026amp;'l~ EA-027 152650 EA-027 152655 :z\n~m\n:s EA-027 152646 EA-022 129906 Qty UOM Priority 2 2 Ea. Ea. BL Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. E\n._ Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 - 4 4 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ .::. $ $ Deficiency Listing 01124/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 361 Estimated 167 Estimated 1,1 ~- ta,i 167 Estimated 181 Estimated 1:/ EaI!maied 361 Estimated 167 Estimated\nl E n\nr,j rt 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 167 Estimated 11:IT ~3411n I ti 167 Estimated 361 Estimated \"l'iir Fo 1ltna, ti 167 Estimated 167 Estimated -1~ l lrrt ti 167 Estimated 542 Estimated ~,!lil'lal!!_d 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 Page 5 of 8 - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 014 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 129907 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 014 Technology Room lacks t~lephone wiring. EA-027 152648 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 11 1:,m1.1\n,JegR C! i~r, ,. a . l'!lll illll Eoi lrrraiu11 015 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152642 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Media Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152651 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Stlire1)1l !laill!\u0026lt;P!1:i\"e ..E. :meijjet1i.: h ~ml= ,fl_glln,tiS - fl~ n I ,7' 11,i 1rl llmd'!'d Fire \u0026amp; Safety Horn/Strobe is missing and is needed 13910-019 59119 12 Ea. $ 4,451 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 59121 Ea. $ 277 Estimated 11 ~Ir S1 g~ D !1Ji\nklrl1,m 1,-. nt11 n\"  ~rl ~ ills 5'a1 Ill 1::3 3m 3'tim31B!! Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery 16500-901 300452 6 Ea. $ 2,415 Estimated Lighting System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335986 LS 2 $ 611 Estimated jl T II I lll ~\u0026amp;ml~ SM7 a,J Ea. - - ::.I : Specialties Exterior Signage requires replacement 10430-003 59098 4 Ea. 3 $ 288 Estimated Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - 11130-901 300453 32,652 SF 3 $ 36,658 Estimated Communications require re lacement 011 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230299 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 011 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253263 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated sto e. 16 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253256 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 018 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213680 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 1il ~\"' j~ t !In\\ I 1raf I'll r E, \"\"'12!' ~ !:!I - 111~1i i 020 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213679 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 020 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230297 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page6 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 01/24/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 019 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213678 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 019 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230296 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated lj!, Ho rn 10lol\"~ ep13rDpna13.\nmau r !Ji tE,Bcne, Ui\nw 26\"3Z!i9 BL ,\n11\n1 5sllmiil9d s.l,t,t\"l\\Je 017 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213677 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 017 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230294 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 017 Sp:,r:,gllli!!s- !\nA-~ J\n160 ci :I l B1Jr11.ti\nt!!.1 013 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213676 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 013 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230298 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated v-ig piae.,151~ Roa, li!!\n,1/,1:i1 ppl'llpil\nit\n\u0026gt;\niiml gkJ11oLf hlacilEc Ell,-~ 1M '4:1~ ._g(,i'j In,\n~lt!~!Ji!!,. 003 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213685 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 003 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230301 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 1)1,- fop! Illes. Ro11ml eelo\u0026amp;a p?fap I 1111c 11mal l! \" E :c- 2Gll~li\nz,a, ~maied ~\u0026amp; 005 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213684 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 005 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230295 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated ltl:i ,,11 rt IJffl 12 9 eppfopru:itl\nl'l'ICIU i ~1 bll--\n0-!i! 258248- f t:.2. ' 0 i.::d Elarageo\" 1 007 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230291 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 007 Specialties EA-058 253247 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated 009 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253248 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 1 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213683 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated u s,, I ' ~m has i~sliffii:11~ 1B~1:1,v ~raia E1cD6!! mac Ei~ 1.802 mii d 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 7 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3137 6003-Arnold Drive Elementary School 01124/2005 Campus: 6003 - Arnold Drive Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253249 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213682 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated U- ..e11 fl\nom h1i1l5n su 1c1e 'IJdi!ca,it ~ .csr\n'2!10292 ti It E::,sU! ~rl 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253250 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated storage. 008 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213681 Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated a. e~,~ Room I, I, YI f'I.Jiol n'I 1'114 EA-U-E ~0\".!!l!l ~ E\ne. ,]1,ij: 1\n51:lma~ 008 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253251 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated storage. 01 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253244 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated 5'1\n:,,age QUI ndiMli9\u0026amp; RnamJaw P'1\u0026lt;!'PnT i!i 1\u0026lt;\u0026gt;u,e, l1 ~ . 1l: im!'E - fill E~tma1ed ge, 12 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230302 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 12 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 253254 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated i'peo:, \"-~ 53~ I,,. E:sllma~d ~' 015 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230303 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 015 Specialties EA-058 253261 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,453 Estimated Media Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213674 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated Media Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230289 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated ',11\n!01 flagi'n laciai apj]OCP,rTE.18i!IDl!Unll D ~r. ~~ :32 Ea 1-=,~11 E:'.iUmaf d ::ii g ' ---- --- SubTotal by Building 159 $ 1,599,161 Grand Total by Campus 177 $ 2,047,282 6003 -Arnold Drive Elementary School 3137 A.P.P.l.E Cl, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 8 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 01'20/2005 Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Site ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks 331407 LS 2 $ 5,850 Estimated to building are not fully compliant Sile ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant 340891 LS 2 $ 2,106 Estimated flllfi, n 1\nire, Ef.bim1lml ~ Site ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not fully 331414 LS 2 $ 702 Estimated compliant Site ADA  Access to playgroundso r athleticf ieldsIs 3\"0892 LS 2 $ 3,510 Estimated notfu com ant Site School lacks marquee or marquee in poor EA-001 105277 Ea. 4 $ 11,635 Estimated condition. Site School lacks dedicated K playground/equipment. EA-004 106665 Ea. 4 $ 24,309 Estimated Sile l) I w 1\n:urr~nl ToP.!b !,i\\iel:la\nr I![ I au '1 fi E\n.. 4 d Site School has insufficient baseball fields. EA--008 108362 Ea. 4 $ 32,188 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 337834 LS 2 $ 1,404 Estimated HVA C m1 UfilJJI eA-112.! D'l E'II, I Ellll,,l!d Electrical School site lacks appropriate lighting. EA-041 106188 Ea. 2 $ 2,437 Estimated Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. EA-033 113255 Ea. $ 20,411 Estimated 5pecfaltl1!5 ch V 21NF, I-1wu Estlm Jti Specialties Elementary S\u0026lt;:1100laI cks appropriate waylinding EA-088 114556 Ea. 4 $ 14,327 Estimated IYIJ(em. SubTotal by Bulldlng 16 $ 204,955 Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Roofing Gutters/Downspouts are missing and are needed 07710-002 52036 125 LF 2 $ 753 Estimated ~ll\"I IL 111~1 ~~ow4Awnm1il~ uirl!S re,:11, .filll18 00 1I ,- - E~tm1 II Exterior Soffit requires replacement 07460--001 52017 950 SF 2 $ 4,718 Estimated 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 1 of 4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Exterior ~m Exterior Exterior 1[1 Exterior Structural I larlia1 Interior Interior I t rl Interior Interior In 1  Interior Interior lniennr Interior Interior \\rne l3f Interior Interior lni!! 'at Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency End of Life: Exterior Doors require replacement ~ Siding requires replacement Soffit requires replacement II ~ r~U _ f\u0026gt;!I~ 1 fll ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant ADA - Stairs are not fully compliant tt CIQgr - -l'ldii:\n,p ~ mlr.5m!J n~deo Ceramic nIe requires replacement VCT flooring requires replacement /\\il!iUSllc.il Cei!illl!J -q Lock/latchset requires replacement End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement DA .I\\ 111,lIt !U .L 'banll am 1J!! 1 V , ~ illtfll ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not fully compliant ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant mill,~ std]F .j , aJ)).111:Q rli! r.l!fW!l'! ADA - Door Hardware Is not fully compliant Carpet requires replacement Pe l1Co.1n g rnq!lrt!lr~\nlilri!lfflllll'M Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement Custom Cabinet requires replacement Cw,Jnm Cabim!l rl?ll Ir pi\n, n,e'1! Countertop requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 08100-900 299504 3 II 07 460-005 52031 07460-001 52032 OT-\u0026lt;tll 0~ -li2Dl:l 321706 321709 oa71lU!01 ~\ni.o:z:7 09310-002 52022 09658-009 52023 Qa tlHMl!I ffl2S 08710-012 52028 09600-903 299507 llt''HIO 322098 335272 ,m111\\J ~ 321708 09680-003 52024 Q ~ - 08210-007 52037 06410-003 52029 1H 06415-003 52039 Qty UOM Priority 14 Door I ' 2,500 350 Vift SF SF LS LS E.a. 375 SF 350 SF 1 !it\\! Sr 45 Ea. 571 SF LS LS LS 2,000 SF 3 Ea. 600 LF c\n8 LF 2 $ 2 2 2 $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01'20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 48,197 ,-4 r 9,544 1,738 '.36D 674 2,340 ID.HO 5,013 1,735 !i,1 27,589 7,634 H.8 8,047 644 ' !i 54 5,879 ,6.1 2,132 318,708 374 Estimated e_r,. II Estimated Estimated EE !illiil Estimated Estimated E\"~llm1e1 Estimated Estimated Eillmil Ei-11 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated F Uni Pil Estimated Estimated E.\u0026lt;1trn Estimated Estimated !\n_q.,IJllaiJ!d Estimated 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page 2 of4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room fl. System HVAC lilll'I HVAC HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing IU[TI!b l'llJ Plumbing Plumbing ~IH,.Ii Deficiency Classroom ventilation inadequate jil i:e111, 11 End of life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Roof Top Units re ire lacement End of Life: Ductwork - Inside Insulation requires replacement End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX Unit ~11, , Eml of rn , D11111 1!1 l:Jll 1J1!,ail\n!~I 111 End of life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant L', 01 r, r._a m I .,.\nr11tee I  l!lfl Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Securtty System requires replacement Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Fire Alann requires replacement - Sala!'!}' E!ili:dI f llfec Eraetg,em\ny,L 'W)lifl\\j - 1 1 h~ I I ry  g J3 SJ FEm raqu p 1 1,1 Specialties End of Life: Closed-Circuit TV System requires replacement Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant B~li1UI /1, uri I I'll I r I ~ill'I,', u11 1~\"1 A.P.P.LE@, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 15830-001 52041 1~1100-UII , !HJ5[]11 15700-902 310403 15700-901 310404 15600-900 299513 15700-902 310405 I I 15400-900 299506 321701 ~2097 15400-900 299512 335276 lidl.'I OB [I 13650-901 299502 13650-900 299506 13700-900 299503 321703 ,, I j Qty UOM Pr1ortty 16 Room 2 $ 6,875 SF 2,291 SF 1,440 SF 1,440 SF 91 Ea. LS 3 Ea. LS 34,389 SF 34,369 SF fl Ea. 34,369 SF LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 $ 2 $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 162,212 I tt If, 61,917 35,520 6,989 12,969 111,650 515 I I 3,661 466 .1111 65,523 46,492 ill 92,279 257 ,11!: Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated l:'!il!mal Estimated Estimated B(j,rl Estimated Estimated ltm~ Estimated Estimated EsllRIGlai.:i 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page 3 of4 State of Arkansas 3092 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Campus: 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor # Room  System Deficiency Specialties ADA- Food Service Line is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Stage accessibility is not fully compliant ei r ' rnJiiliPBl'Sri rall1ill\"1lt rep \"~lli Iii Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communications require replacement Specialties End of Life: Public Address and Intercom - Communicationresq uirer eplacement A.P .P .LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty 332093 335274 I 01 ) 1:1 =, 11130-901 299505 34,389 11130-901 299514 1,440 SubTotal by Building 62 Grand Total by Campus 68 UOM Priority LS 2 $ LS 2 $ - SF 3 $ SF 3 $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,925 Estimated 14,040 Estimated I ,w l\nfllf1111l-1 38,608 Estimated 1,617 Estimated 1,514,440 1,719,394 6003 - Baker lnterdistrict Elem. Sch. 3092 Page4 of 4 State of Arkansas 3146 6003 - Bates Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bates Elementary School Building: Floor# Room# System Deficiency Site K playground has inappropriate impact material. Site Playground lacks appropriate impact surface. :-1: _ 011,I !! In ,rjjJ ei,tmol L u~~G i.j- Site School has insufficient baseball fields. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. ~ I JII (cc f0Dm I!:  ~ p pm::!: 'furn 111, Specialties School lacks appropriate central PA equipment. A.P.P.LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-005 106762 EA-013 108958 = IJ B EA-008 108390 EA-033 113278 le' 11 EA-036 114311 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority Ea. 2 $ 4 Ea. 2 $ Ea. 4 $ Ea. $ Ea. 4 $ 7 $ 7 $ Deficiency Listing 01/200006 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2,467 Estimated 9,867 Estimated Eatlmul 32,188 Estimated 20,411 Estimated I llm!atell 101,796 Estimated 201,739 201,739 6003- Bates Elementary School 3146 Page 1 of 1 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site It Site Site Site Site le, Site Site Site Site HVAC Electrical Deficiency Sidewalk requires replacement Traffic Sign is missing and is needed Tml1 - ... n 11hMI f ,1,, \"'' I ADA - Accessible routes from parxlng or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Handicap parxing spaces ere not fully compliant ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is 1101 I llv oomplitlr ~ i 1 6 II IJ~Bllfl[i!t l!Di41J,Obe I ill! I I Playlield Equip (2nd to 5th) requires replacement School lacks marquee or marquee In poor -1 1111, mlll School has Insufficient baseball fields. Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. A A~wle Cloon.11a,ap\nncl T!d Jv 111111 1 Computer room lacks independent AC. Exterior Light - Light Pole - Parlcing \u0026amp; Road is mlssin and Is needed Specialties School lacks an appropriate suNeillance system. Specialties School's PBX is undersized. A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02775-002 69123 02690-001 69113 IJ f,Ofl I\\ , 340696 337635 331423 331427 , . 02880-009 69116 EA-001 105278 EA-008 106364 EA-031 112667 ,r EA-025 110716 16520-001 69126 EA-033  113256 EA-030 112100 SubTotal by Building Qty UOM Priority 2,000 SF 2 $ 4 Ea. 2 $ E.c LS LS I LS LS 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. LF Ea. 4 Ea. 20 Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2 $ $ 4 $ $ Deficiency Listing 01/2W2005 Repair Cost life Cycle Status 9,706 660 \"' 5,650 2,106 3,510 3,510 I' 114,817 11,635 32,166 19,750 I, I 13,636 6,788 20.411 17,550 321,096 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated BUrniloled Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated EilifmalE!d Estimated Estimated 11!1 I cl Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 1 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: 1st Grade Wing Floor# Room # System Deficiency ?j11},~\nii~~r~f:[if~faf~Jfi:~~itWtl~lili~Jtij.cih~ Interior Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed 125 u 127 128 Interior lftl Interior Interior ln_1_t I Interior HVAC Elrolcii1 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 1!19:! 111 Ill Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 129 Cl!Juib 111d ocI 1111 1 I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom ventilation inadequate GFl Ro.t!FJl dt I ,1 ~ 129 Electrical Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. 125 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. ~ ITTli! i!:l\\E jSBJI IIIlll !lit I 126 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 126 Room lacks telephone wiring. mh 127 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. 128 T echnotogy Room has insufficient dataports. Ill f h1 IDIJI' W!Ir 129 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. 129 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. f I S~I  ,Slnd '!lJ I 1111tri_g1 '1/11 125 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 125 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 08710--001 69399 EA-040 182390 1Jll!il 1 EA-040 182392 EA--040 182388 -~- I! ~ EA-040 182389 15830--001 69406 ,ll !1\\1} EA-084 267481 EA-022 142721 ,6 EA-022 142722 EA-027 152409 . 1 I ff EA-027 152410 EA--022 142724 E'A:-0~7 51 1 EA-022 142771 EA-027 152412 (i.ll EA-053 213131 EA-055 229590 Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status t\n~]mlii~,~j.~~ijji\nJ\n~~1[lc~' Ea. $ 5,493 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 8L l=!it11m11aii Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 100 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated 4 Room 2 $ 40,655 Estimated ?'I lnmii Ea. 4 $ 399 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated E\n.. 1_, EaIm j 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Ee E:11.!1 \"II Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated E.z 1 , Esil 11,i.l 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated u. ~I I 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated i:,,,.\n..~. ..~. m~~~~~\"l,~-rn:.-\"=T.r~ .... ~~.\nq:=.,,, 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 2 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: 1st Grade Wing Floor# Room # System Deficiency 125 Specialties Blinds are missing or In poor condition. 126 Specialties Room has insufficient tack.board area. I I I{ I Milqllge, 127 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 127 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 12? S~im R-o ll1era11a- 128 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 128 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. ::!I! s i!!GlaJ!m e-mm1 llICJ\\s~.PP pn.1118 8\"1 U~T Dfl01!!~tJ\n,r iilaf~ 129 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 129 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Building: Elementary or Primary Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-085 283819 EA-055 229591 D 48ffl EA-053 213130 EA-055 229592 ,i,(l EA-053 213129 EA-055 229593 EA-tJlffi Q! Si!11 EA-055 229594 EA-058 246812 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Listing 01/2Q.l2005 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 24 SF Surf 4 $ 285 Estimated 1 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated ~ ~lu,IJ!!il. 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated ~ -- 131Ed Ea. 4 $ 953 Estimated 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated ~ I  ~Ill it Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 36 $ 114,008 Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status    i .:. .J\\\n)~,::~t''.tt:Jf\nijj~J\n.:\"~!0~Q~iljl~:~_~#9.il4{,i~'~~t[~\n:11J~.f~tlf~~li1@:::i[c~1:f\n~:\ni ~'(1~fA$,l(:t'\n'::'ii\n*ti\\\n~:g1:i:@::r:~1-~1t:~., .~\ntiI'1i,.Exterior Aluminum Window (Awning) requires replacement 08520-003 69177 240 SF 2 $ 13,600 Estimated Exterior ~ior Interior Interior 11 , or A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EIFS needs minor repairs /\\Cl ri1i  I Doorti'il~ ~,e Plll !!!lly Auto Door Open - Handicap is missing and is needed Ceramic Tile requires replacement 07240-002 69181 Im 08710-001 69210 09310-002 69197 FJii'Ull 400 SF 2 $ 2 Ea. 1,425 SF 2 $ 2,451 1,1 10,986 19,050 Estimated I 1 lad Estimated Estimated IIMI 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 3 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority 115 I ' 116 116 Ill 109 110 1 It 111 111 Interior Interior Interior Interior I r, Interior Interior l Eff,]f Interior Interior l!illU Interior Interior ln!u  t Interior Interior Acoustical Suspension requires replacement Acoustical Ceiling requires replacement Oi.llJ ICh Panic Device requires replacement ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant I o ~r151(\nn , I U  ttr,, I m I lly mm~IIBrt\" ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Ol!D ~p Jll1~ !l -, I a,e. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,roamdk ll!l!i ~N' Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. 1plfl1) 14!1,1 1 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. 09130-003 69206 09510-003 69207 l!. I Ill II 08710--015 69212 322102\n!! I07 322110 EA-039 176782 E'A.-ilD ~112I, EA--039 176783 EA-040 202110 EA-11 i! 1IITTfil EA-040 202103 EA--039 176777 U ~II HI EA-039 176778 EA--040 2021 05 21,475 SF 21,475 SF i 7 Ea. LS .s LS Ea. \"\"\n1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 1i~\n~x~?~~~\n~~~-r:~~i~~%@~:~r~J-~~~~~~~~~:~~~1~1e~1,~lP.'1t~~~g~~~~~i:\n!~~ , E 1 112 Interior Classroomdoorlacksappropriatehardware. EA-040 202106 1 Ea. 117 118 118 1 II Interior 1111II ~ Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. d!!)Of I Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I :1 , m 11aM 11 !Ilia prop IE 111 111 I, EA-039 0..t\u0026gt; I EA-039 EA--040 t/lJ,4 0 176784 ~,,1, 176785 202112 ' ~ Ea. Ea. Ea. ~ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20l2006 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 51,309 73,319 I ' 6,216 827 I ' 4,965 190 190 439 439 190 if II 190 439 I rl 439 190 4.1 190 439 111:i Estimated Estimated Es lma1e,I Estimated Estimated I I 11.0 eJ!I Estimated Estimated fl1T1nled Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 1=~11m 11!!1 Estimated Estimated Esilmi\nl'etl Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated I 11111 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 4 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 119 120 121 121 122 123 124 124 101 103 I ' 104 104 11~c 105 105 11 106 107 II) 108 System Interior Interior I~ ul r Interior Interior 1H Interior Interior h1u rim Interior Interior 111 Interior Interior u-,, Interior Interior 11, 11[1 Interior Interior ltl II Interior Interior lhf or Interior A.P .P .LE , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. r.:\nJ\nissf 0111~ llf)F I ~mp I 1 I Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. l~\"I I LIJjL t\n,i, ll\u0026lt;i!Jt,:.I, Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. .J I ,I '\"Ill anode - li!IJ!)flllJllBlil Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. IIJflJQIJI 01 ta Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. m, p cprj , lllflll ClassfOOm door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,:::Jaam11111 a 1 ~- li I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Lnaunom doc liiJJ:9i,\nc.!'II !'' !)Iii I 1, 1 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Deficiency Code AssesslO  EA-040 201890 EA-039 t I EA--039 EA-040 'rP EA-040 EA--039 II EA--039 EA--040 -os EA--040 EA-039 ,41,l EA-039 EA--040 E/\\fl EA--039 EA--040 ~ 9 EA-040 EA-039 EA-039 176787 HI 1 176788 201892 T ~ 201893 176790 'I ' 176791 201895 -,1- 202096 176769 - ..!tl!I 176770 202098 l71fl'1i 176772 202099 202100 176774 mi lJ 176775 Qty UOM Priority Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. 2 8 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. '2,. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. '=,31. Ea. Ea. E3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Deficiency Listing 01na2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 439 Estimated 190 \\ll 190 439 11m 439 190 190 439 I l 439 190 JI Ill 190 439 1 \" 190 439 100 439 190 190 Estimated Bo.lim\ni11W Estimated Estimated t:llllmated Estimated Estimated Eisll11 1, ~ Estimated Estimated 111111 Estimated Estimated I,, Estimated Estimated n,m~!j, Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Ee-1 i..ir LI Estimated 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 5 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room # System 108 113 114 Interior 11 b .. m, Interior Interior I I I ltlf Interior Interior Interior HVAC I II/ . HVAC HVAC HVAC Plumbing 1111 111ll Plumbing Plumbing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I.lit.a 1 nm .ioE IJ,~ lras,111rnmlls ~/llm, ,.a11 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. I.J __\ni 1111 _DOI p11mr,, ~ 11 , , lw'11 Paint/Coaling requires replacement Wood Door (Single Hung) requires replacement ,\n.,q l.:i -- r-,,JJ~ fl ~1,1i1!11~il Countertop requires replacement Furnace requires replacement flVI LI I 0~ M:f tn. \\14 , ,epl llEllllffll Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 5 Ton requires replacement Evaporative Condenser -Air Cool 10 Ton requires re lacement Ductwork requires replacement Classroom ventilation inadequate ~1ill1 I rl Ut1ih Qlllr r.cil , n End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Window Units require replacement End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement E:11 \" ~ cmes, M-11 squlree repli!.17:!n,em ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant ADA - Lavatory is not fully compliant Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 202102 ! rL It EA-040 202107 EA-039 176781 _L 0~ 09910-002 69208 08210-007 69209 U ..a M 06415-003 69214 15530-003 69216 15660-006 69220 15660-009 69221 15810-002 69239 15830-001 69240 11'.1,!fl'I 15700-900 310410 15400-900 299526 1ill llllf i\" 322113 335278 Qty UOM Priority Ea. :: Ea. Ea. 4,360 SF 81 Ea. J 225 LF 10 Ea. E,\na Ea. 4 Ea. 32,000 SF 22 Room -1,,., 0 1,200 SF 86 Ea. Ill LS LS 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 $ 4 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01 /2lll2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 439 1111 439 190 .\\ 3,724 57,544 J\ni 10,506 29,320 I I 7,536 34,534 154,814 222,990 , 3,460 105,515 14,896 1,656 Estimated E~Hm~1au Estimated Estimated [ Iii JiJ ti Estimated Estimated 11,11 j1 ' Estimated Estimated EUlm Ir Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Esi,mul LI Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 6 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 115 116 11 109 110 112 118 Ill 120 121 System Plumbing Plumbing l11rll ttg Plumbing Plumbing 11111 t, JI Plumbing Plumbing 11  1nl1 Plumbing Plumbing F11UI11iJIHII Deficiency Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Room lacks private toilets. Cl1t!is11i , Lok r11 ,.q um 1 11j  Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. -l3ssl!Ujl!f1 I ' Ired m,.m~m t ltUt Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 1111100 I 1h11, Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. Classroom law the required number of sinks. ,\nI I __ 123 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 124 Plumbing Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. !i~J!f:(ii\n'/1{,f~~~i:t ulfl I r 111 111 115 115 I t11 116 109 j Electrical Electrical i3actris.il GFI Receptacle is missing and Is needed GFI Receptacle is missing and is needed Ell 114g 1 ~. 111 ~II M I JTiJ Ii\\'! I II I ~ l Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \u0026gt;It Al ll!tks j !!JJf,011C 11 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-064 EA-063 EA-064 EA-064 E,WJ EA-064 EA-064 EA-064 EA-064 I , I 261087 256456 1nl11 !I 261079 261080 IWI 261083 261092 261094 261095 I EA-064 261097 EA--064 261 099 11.172 16140-001 69241 16140--001 69244 ' i~ ~ EA--022 142749 EA-027 170456 E i\nl%i\nEA--027 170457 EA-022 142738 7 ,fi\\l Qty UOM Priority Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. E3 2 Ea. 6 Ea. 3 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ - Deficiency Listing 01'20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 678 4,915 678 678 678 678 ,1' 678 678 678 678 ii1 271 814 ,011~ 542 167 167 542 '\" Estimated Estimated -11111111 I Estimated Estimated 6!11m I 1! Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 11 ,,., 11 Estimated Estimated E,\nlfl1lil !!ti Estimated Estimated t=I II rl Estimated Estimated Esllnt\u0026lt;M Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 7 of 14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01/200005 Campus: 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 110 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142739 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 110 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170451 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I , , jf):'.tI:t\n~t\nltf:~~~ lrI I 11 I p\nu, ~2 b!A111a 111 Technology Room lacks telephone wilfng. EA-027 170452 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 112 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142742 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,1, U !loitl (j,le,:1, nE WII\n11 ~ I, E l'l\"I 117 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142755 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 117 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170458 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I ITI ~hl'ID!I~ :l , Ol'I c...i.n\"i!f tl 119 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142757 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 119 Technology EA-027 170460 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated IIW T.a1n ,y 11 II\" 120 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170461 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 121 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142760 Ea. 4 $ 161 Estimated i 1 T~ttll1\u0026gt;Ulu 1 m .. I ,\n!\\~ Ii, fl  n!I 'NII' (UL 11.'r ~lf al 122 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142762 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 122 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170463 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated -y rltll ii 1  17 ~t!i iiie 123 Technology Room lacks telephone wilfng. EA-027 170464 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 124 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142765 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated I rm!.\\! ~~ t7U \u0026amp;ii ~ If E:1tmnled 101 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142728 2 Ea. 4 $ 361 Estimated 101 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170442 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated J\nf 11!Ch'10 l!.Y flrrzorn ttes lnsu E Ee. 51111 103 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170443 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 8 of 14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01fl0'2005 Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 104 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170444 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated l'Jll' ! ,rnI I I I a a,::,oM!!!i' -0 lill.7~1 . .' . ~f I I 102 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170445 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 105 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170446 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated I I Ill.'? !gphona1 WI ll!JI, e,, __ 12.7 70~,7 1 ,, ,I 107 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142737 3 Ea. 4 s 542 Estimated 107 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170448 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 1111! T .. 1]\"1111 00m1nki\ni!pllO!le 1111, 11~ \"I I,, Bi i~,11\"11 113 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142744 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated 113 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170454 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 11 TectmnlQl!Jil' ftoo~ ll!ll!l Ulr~dlll \u0026gt; j,df. I - 2 _!l 114 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 170455 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Battery Pack Emergency Light is missing and is 13910-001 69245 6 Ea. $ 1,671 Estimated needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Pull Station is missing and is needed 13910-022 69249 2 Ea. $ 555 Estimated Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed 13910-025 69252 40 Ea. $ 13,151 Estimated 1\n,1.. 1111, fl I~ ,~r: i]{!C2'.l.6[i\n:11J - Hal U 11111 11' f L:ic - '  Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant 335280 LS 2 $ 827 Estimated Specialties Toilet Compartment requires replacement 10155-003 69215 32 Ea. 3 $ 40,061 Estimated 11 IQ llllff111 ht l\\li1ttl1- I I EA- v 151 ,- lme\\~cl 115 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229573 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 115 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246412 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 51cir:,Jtj' qpedallleEi Room has lfi::iEJllW Iii ,g atl.lili igwjfl3 ~, '',, 1, I I 13511nl,e 116 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229574 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,170 Estimated 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 9 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 116 111 109 109 System Deficiency Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher ,\\o:ra ,,\u0026amp;J..,\n,jl E lifoom tm ~ 1/!.,\\iMI I II Hl,UI II Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. ~i~].i~{lit~t~t~~!fi]ffiJJf~~-~--I ~n'.m!~a !~fi l 11 O Specialties Room has insufficient tack board area. 110 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher liill I 111 111 112 112 117 117 11 118 118 ii I 119 119 $\\'iB(Aal E hi ! Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher\nl'Ql\n!I !\n~ Illes Rcmm rn1e  i\nufr.- 11t,1ij I Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher Specialties Specialties Specialties Specialties ,l\"lr ~f' Room has insufficient tackboard area. Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher .Jlli .r,1 i1ff11 fl!I Room has insufficient tackboard area. I ui  , 111 11 II,, 1 ii wnllng arss, Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 246413 EM~ I Tl EA-055 229578 EA--058 246406 ~- _\\.l' t EA-055 229575 EA-058 246407 l EA--055 229576 EA--058 246408 I fl EA--055 229577 EA--058 246409 EA-055 EA-058 -ll!i , EA-055 EA--058 L rn 229572 246414 l!I !1 229565 246415 EA-055 229570 EA--058 246416 Qty UOM Priority 5 Ea. 4 $ 5 Ea. 7 Ea. Es 5 Ea. 8 Ea. 5 Ea. 8 Ea. EL 5 Ea. 7 Ea. 3 5 3 6 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Eai 3 Ea. 5 Ea. 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 4 4 4 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cyde Status 2.422 .100 2,170 3,391 I I 2,170 3,875 I flt:!i 2,170 3,875 ' 11, 2,170 3,391 1,302 2,422 1,302 2,906 1,302 2,422 Estimated 1,,, I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Jma.uW Estimated Estimated E l!ll'-!ci Estimated Estimated I Ullf~i Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E!l 1111!tB Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 10 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room f. System Deficiency 120 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 120 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto 121 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 121 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto 122 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 122 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher 123 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 123 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. 1- sa .. c1~11~1 I I 123 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. 124 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 1 (I ~1 ~- 124 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 101 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. 1111 I 1141 101 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. 1 103 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. s'llt111 11m1 I+ , ,111 1 a~ n,,u M1!1H1I ~c~ A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Listing 01l20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status EA-055 229568 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-056 246417 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated ted EA-055 229569 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-058 246418 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-055 229571 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated EA-056 247828 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213108 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated EA-055 229567 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 11m E E!.111! IAII EA-065 283814 24 SF Surf 4 $ 285 Estimated EA-053 213107 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated E. ~5 :1.2\nmz ind EA-058 247830 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213123 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated I . lli ' E-=_ EA-058 246398 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated EA-053 213126 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated - ~ ~, E,,\nr1m, 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 3094 Page 11 of14 - - - State of Arkansas Deficiency Listing 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School 01/2W2005 Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code Assessl0 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 103 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246399 7 Ea. 4 $ 3,391 Estimated storage. 1,0.4 Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213127 3 Ea. 4 $ 2,858 Estimated -5pec!J\nJt RoOIII II I fll f1 1\u0026gt;1511-, llm 1~ 104 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246400 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. 102 Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. EA-020 125764 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 1L -\nro,1111 = nDtn Jlll! Ins llleJa nl 1\n,nnt 11 ' 8 II~ - ~ E\u0026amp;1,n1 I ,,l 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229587 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246401 8 Ea. 4 $ 3,875 Estimated StOI' 105 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229579 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 105 Specialties EA-058 246402 6 Ea. 4 $ 2,906 Estimated ,LIil 106 Specialties Room has insufficient tack.board area. EA-055 229583 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 106 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246403 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated sto e. 107 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229585 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 107 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246404 4 Ea. 4 $ 1,938 Estimated s e. 108 Specialties Room has Insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 229580 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 108 Specialties EA-058 246405 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated 113 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 246410 Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated storage. 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 12 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Bavou Meto Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 114 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher .,.. 111, MC Specialties Room lacks access to video distribution. MC Specialties Room lacks a fixed TV. all - iiii 101 ih In.! Ill '111 MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. MC Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-058 246411 II I ,1i7'1l' EA-020 125763 EA-045 203945 E _,.1 0~ EA-055 229564 EA-085 283816 SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD Deficiency Listing Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 4 $ 484 Estimated 111 - !Mad 1 Ea. 4 $ 369 Estimated 2 Ea. 4 $ 3.833 Estimated ltl~ I llni I 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated 240 SF Surf 4 $ 2,851 Estimated 225 $ 1,836,276 Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Exterior Siding requires replacement 07460-005 69335 800 SF 2 $ 3,054 Estimated Exterior ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant 321715 LS 2 $ 674 Estimated lnlL llll \" f ,I li~ll11LI 1H 19JflD ~ Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully 322116 LS 2 $ 161 Estimated compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 335282 LS 2 $ 54 Estimated 111 4111~ 1 J,11 n~i1m 10 tll .. Ill ' LI!\u0026gt; !:.sUT l i _rfll CDl!lploant P3A Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176794 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated P3B Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 176792 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated IW1 LIi r~ l I -,r~n\n.ii u 1 l II llfl _J _, 111lill!J HVAC End of life: Controls - DOC requires replacement 15900-902 299528 1,440 SF 2 s 2,859 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310411 1,440 SF 2 $ 12,969 Estimated Unit requires replacement 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page 13 of 14 State of Arkansas 3094 6003 - Bayou Meto Elementary School Campus: 6003- Bayou Meto Elementarv School Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # P3B P3A PJB P3B P3A P3A I ,U PJB P3B System Electrical Electrical Electrical Technology r - ~a~ Technology Technology ~ Deficiency GFI Receptacle Is missing and is needed Exterior Light - Wall Mount is missing and is needed  ... m1 , - IIRll rr1 - 11 r,,\nrl II nfm lfij) Room lacks controls to partially dim lights. Room has insufficient dataports. ,., ', , Room has insufficient dataports. Room lacks telephone wiring. B l'IB\"~ ii Ei ~ 1111 na.\nds~ Fire \u0026amp; Safety Exit Sign is missing and is needed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Hom/Strobe Is missing and is needed I 111I1I ,,! fy 111 1111 19-1111-Dln!l.tas nn ead'ed Fire \u0026amp; Safety Smoke Detector is missing and is needed Specialties ADA - Grab Bars are not fully compliant II l'l '11 h lliliUffi i'!FI tr1E\n!fr,:l\ni a. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. hi 11 l!,lt i.-,. IS res. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 16140-001 69356 16520-007 69358 EA-084 EA-022 EA 12.7 ITT 7 - 267480 142725 no~ EA-022 142726 EA-027 167039 I, 11,111! lili~- ~ 13910-004 69363 13910-019 69364 l:.Wm-411 13910-025 69367 335286 Ii/-  ~I M EA-058 248429 EA-085 283817 5 222,lj EA-058 248430 EA-085 283818 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. t=a 3 Ea. Ea. 2 Ea. 2 Ea. E\nm Ea. LS L 2 4 4 4- 4 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 3 Ea. 4 $ 20 SF Surf 4 $ Ea. 4 $ 20 SF Surf 4 $ 33 314 $ $ Deficiency Listing Ol/2CY.l005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 271 516 3 399 542 542 167 522 742 329 27 1,453 238 484 238 70,067 2,341,446 Estimated Estimated I 1,, H~ Estimated Estimated 1,5\\ilfle: ~ Estimated Estimated {:!, O! Estimated Estimated 11111l Estimated Estimated ~, li!II Estimated Estimated I I Estimated Estimated 6003 - Bayou Melo Elementary School 3094 Page 14 of 14 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Site Site Site Site Site Site Site Exterior Electrical Deficiency ADA - Accessible routes from parking or sidewalks to building are not fully compliant ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant AJ.J'_-'.lA ~ t,le r11..i e!i t!al!,,,een tru,ldl~J d r cilitle,3ar e ~.atr u r.ornllanl ADA - Handicap parking spaces are not JIIIIY compliant - ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully co t Playfield Equip (Pre-K to 1st) needs minor repairs The school has insufficient parking. -Sehl: _I I1ai\nin31dffic:i Bus drop-off area does not have a canopy. ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant uim,IEr mo 13d 111,i fl ,, I I 1 School site lacks appropriate lighting. Specialties School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. - j!E'Gl2.llie! Si::Jm :!e p- ls !1ml~1 I i:l Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Roofing Roofing !IINJ Roofing A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Built-Up Bituminous Roofing requires replacement Gutters/Downspouts need minor repairs \u0026amp;,d ol L~: RQ fr P 15w t-U\" reo\niu~e-nipra..,m 1 End of Life: Roofing System1 - Single Ply requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 02880--011 331413 340929 337869 68733 EA-002 105704 U O 2 EA-031 112675 331418 ~ 111111i EA-041 106207 EA-033 113270 FA,,lllo 1n-,n SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 07510-003 68749 07710-003 68750 , ~SD 94-U 07500-904 341649 Qty UOM Priority LS LS LS LS Ea. 1,750 SF 15 la,a LF LS Ea. Ea. Ea 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2 $ 2 $ $ $ Qty UOM Priority 47,800 SF 100 LF 2,280 SF 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2,340 936 jj 702 3,510 11,698 2,636 19,750 585 2,437 20,411 - I 132,190 Estimated Estimated 11,mb,~ Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated llm t..d Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 379,306 999 9,672 Estimated Estimated Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 1 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 4-2 103 SIP SIP I I 101 2-1 2-2 2-3 System Exterior Interior I, I ~I Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior Interior 11'14 Interior Interior I I ,ir Interior Interior In Interior Interior A.P.P.L.E, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Steel Door (Single Hung) requires replacement 5\\'~l!l'!'IB ~UI , H!L t l!'nl ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant End of Life: Ceramic Tile requires replacement I= 'Cl L! : 031\"'1Q~, ~  II o TIie:\nfl311Lli\"ll 4\"QP!iriCi!mtHil End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended TIies require re lacement ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant ADA - Room dimension to create accessible toilet room is not full com liant Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. ~ .apl)rapiiela /1e~tL Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Dltl ,ft '' l  PJlJ13iPfli1hlee ~!ll!3n, Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. -'1~~?'1~~ liQrd al! Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Cl~ fi'.I m II\"' II ~ r 11 l 1 w.:sre. Deficiency Code AssesslD 08110-006 687 48 lll!!i!!~ anilr., 322119 09600-903 300363 08200-900 300369 09500-900 300373 EA-040 EA-039 11-!ll EA-039 EA-040 I ~  322654 333520 182523 177124 1!!i'lii.li 177119 182524 EA-040 182519 EA-039 177120 0 EA-040 182526 EA-040 182527 ~,-0 1'!!25 Qty UOM Priority 2 Ea. s-=- LS 612 SF 11\\(1 ~1: 60 Door 47,874 SF LS LS Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01120/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,671 THl 9,366 8,182 36,785 163,450 1,873 11,708 439 190 lB 190 439 \\\\ _\n439 190 439 439 Estimated lrrn1l'i!d Estimated Estimated le, Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E ltnifiir Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated E!.111 tJ!jl:d 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page2 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 1-1 1-2 System Interior Interior Deficiency Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 182529 EA-040 182530 !1li~r!~}lif\n.Q1~~JiitfI=!J~efl(-Jt'.(~lrS'-I-Jffl?i1r'[\nf/{\nf,Y 1-4 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182532 K-1 K-2 K-3 K-4 5-1 5-3 5-4 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-3 \\-1 3-4 Interior Ii I  r Interior Interior inleri Interior Interior I ,Bier Interior Interior 1111Br1r Interior Interior 1\"'1.E!r Interior Interior Interior Interior !~8\",o~ Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Dia~ m 0011\" I Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. C Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Gl=rrmrti r.lwCIII s- pptop - l,e tJl-Vl9r' Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. ,-1 \"'ll\\lam !lb r IRl!4 ll'le ~!ll\"raplie~ ~ !1fJ~ n~ Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. GI nn  itflu, I   p ~p 31e rrl , Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. I '!\u0026gt;BIii i1u .. , la~ lh!! uF!IIJI fl:! ~ltiarr P:3fle!. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Cl =, 'f tin,,, J i 11, .!!!pprnplif= 1Ja11l Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177121 ~~ B2.e7!9 EA-040 182534 EA-039 177116 EA--':IJ\\D I _ 1: EA-040 182536 EA-039 177117 EA--039 177118 EA-040 182538 1171 I! EA-040 182539 EA-039 177114 EA-ll-,lc, a D EA-039 177115 EA-040 182543 II i ll 11/J EA--040 182544 EA--039 177111 E !i EA-039 177112 Qty UOM Ea. Ea. ~o Ea. Ea. E\nEa. Ea. E\n, Ea. Ea. I! Ea. Ea. 'i':a-, Ea. Ea. E\nEa. Ea. Ea. Ea. ~-- Ea. Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated - -I~~ EE 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated ~I E!s!lITTa rl 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated !!al E51.1'1Tul 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated ~ l:sl1n ii ,,~ 2 $ 190 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated ~ It I 11 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated\n11111,1,, 2 $ 190 Estimated 2 $ 439 Estimated If( Estfrmne11 2 $ 439 Estimated 2 $ 190 Estimated E,111111 ,rl 2 $ 190 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 3 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency 3-4 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-040 182546 1 w,1~,i i'.~Wljl~~,~a1~t~?~ ~t~~~-~J\n!~~J.,~,~~P,i,ff,1~t:~~ii4'-:~-':~, ~1AA~m9l ,a~~ 102 Interior Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. EA-040 182520 MP-1 101 J2 4-1 4-1 Interior lri/AL HVAC HVAC JI\\C HVAC HVAC Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Plumbing Electrical Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. E\u0026amp;naw\nt f1 n - ~a.ro\u0026amp; 8Q,\nl'1 rtn 11 m !f:E.11~,i mt,, ~ n i,t1 Make-up air inadequate Ductwork requires replacement 111\u0026gt;111 11:Jr1m ,, lit End of Life: Controls - DOC requires replacement I' iJl]fb To(!: Ill End of Life: Faucets and Fixtures require replacement End of Life: Domestic Water Piping System re uires re lacement ADA - Drink Fountains are not fully compliant Classroom lacks the required number of sinks. 11oi1 ,11 mu ~ ml/ End of Life: Lighting Fixtures require replacement Electrical End of Life: Electrical Service requires lli!i\n.,ac.,menl 1110 -~ E'IT ~r r-e: sii\nWr T~leia l!E uire f1!I lar.11mi,[ Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA--040 182541 Jaa o s~ 15810-001 68755 15810-002 68756 .!i il-OOi 15900-902 300361 15900-900 300371 15400-900 300359 15100-907 300365 333526 EA-064 261058 l! f\\ . 16500-900 300362 16400-901 300370 EA--022 142640 EA--027 152616 Qty -, 50,034 50,034 25,017 25,017 85 50,034 2 13,237 50,034 !Hf,{~ Deficiency Listing 01/2Qi2005 UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated =3 I, -::1a:1 Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated Ea. 2 $ 439 Estimated EslJmal:s-d SF 2 $ 115,433 Estimated SF 2 $ 242,062 Estimated Flm11 1 \" Eal1 ~ SF 2 $ 49,664 Estimated SF 2 $ 49,664 Estimated i\n: - 1r- - - Ea. 2 $ 104,288 Estimated SF 2 $ 53,977 Estimated LS 2 $ 16,860 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 1,356 Estimated = 1 I I SF 2 $ 51,526 Estimated SF 2 $ 6,550 Estimated :!! , E\n~E:!1 Ea. 4 $ 181 Estimated Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page4 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/200S Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 4-2 Teehnology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 152617 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated 103 Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142631 3 Ea. )n 1111 ~QY EP,-017 1/nll, I SIP R-1 101 101 2-2 2-3 1-1 1-2 1- 1-4 K-1 K-3 K-4 ~1 5-2 5-3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T3!:ihocl ~ R Ill~ al~no Yp 11tl Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. dn ~~ ~.a= 1~i.11ilr. ,I ti , 1J1\u0026amp; Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Tr I f y Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. lJI ltxl Teehnology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. ui _ ~ on, i\ni~ 1ns11ffi\u0026lt;\n,i,,'n lai:t Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. T~chnci'- ,\n, 11 111'3 i J l,j\n.tar, r Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Tec\nhn~lcigv R ft! I 1!. In iJtl fll oa\\.i A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-027 152618 EA-022 142683 u EA-022 142629 EA-027 152619 I~ :!a i ii1l:~ EA-022 142649 EA-022 142650 E,J!..[l l'ci'6fj1 EA-022 142652 EA-022 142653 \" 1'42654 EA-022 EA-022 \"!\n:.,.022. EA-022 EA-022 EA-022 EA-022 ,-~ 142657 142667 1~ 142671 142672 1 i57r, 142676 142677 7i Ea. 3 Ea. l:a. 3 Ea. Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 Ea. 3 3 2 2 2 I: Ea. Ea. Eo1 Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated !Al 4 $ 167 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated ~ lltqaJ,\nQ. 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 167 Estimated -= u.1111 11,l 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated e!Jif 111 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 542 Estimated t-!Umaetl 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 181 Estimated 4 '7 \"ii ::~- 4 $ 542 Estimated 4 $ 361 Estimated ~rnet:c!rl 4 $ 361 Estimated 4 $ 361 Estimated E91i,-iee 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 5 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementary School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# 3-1 3-2 System Deficiency Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-022 142716 EA-022 142717 :~ft~Jiitt!~~-~t~~liiiil~tt,ilft\"frl~S~l1~\u0026amp;i~mJ 3-4 102 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142719 MP-1 4-1 4-1 l 4-2 4-2 ,,-2: 103 R-1 101 2-1 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. \\l'I' , \"\" li!!t 12/enl1omr wlrtng. Technology Room has insufficient dataports. Fire \u0026amp; Safety End of Life: Emergency Lighting - Standby Battery Specialties ADA - Counter Height is not fully compliant Specialties ADA - Food Seivice Line is not fully compliant ~~I~~ rl :S.\ngn--~ i!i mi:!1.Slnag f1lli E n ci Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. .s a~,iiop!ia e am,ml I C,-- .II~ Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. PfTII Bi.fl\n: - proflria1a illlDLl,.1~ ri r 111111 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher sto e. Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher storage. Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 EA-022 142630 FA I' 6:'W EA-022 142682 16500-901 300366 333522 333524 l!l,II Cl-001 fJBT.52 EA-053 213601 EA-055 230198 EA-053 213602 EA-055 230197 r= -O!ill' 2~ -20!ii EA-058 246203 EA-058 246206 EA-058 24 7794 EA-085 284026 Qty 3 3 3 2 29 2 2 .: 2 2 3 UOM Ea. Ea. l::a- Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. LS LS Eal Ea. Ea. Ea Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. Ea. 24 SF Surf Priority 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 11 4 $ $ 2 $ 2 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 542 Estimated 542 Estimated E.sum3l_d 542 Estimated 361 Estimated 1Jri,1 ~I 181 Estimated 11,672 Estimated 1,170 Estimated 1,170 Estimated 1- mall!.ti. 1,905 Estimated 868 Estimated E'.\nbrr 953 Estimated 868 Estimated - q f\nSil'me eel 484 Estimated 969 Estimated 1,453 Estimated 285 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 6 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 1 102 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230195 3 Ea. 4 $ 1,302 Estimated 102 Specialties Room lacks appropriate amount of teacher EA-058 247795 5 Ea. 4 $ 2,422 Estimated storage. I ~111121\u0026amp;liK:~ls.%{ NJ,. I ~. MC Specialties Room has insufficient writing area. EA-053 213600 2 Ea. 4 $ 1,905 Estimated MC Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230194 2 Ea. 4 $ 868 Estimated SubTotal by Building 128 $ 2,761,542 Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room# System Deficiency Deficiency Code AssesslD Qty UOM Priority Repair Cost Life Cycle Status Interior End of Life: Door Hardware requires replacement 08200-900 300374 1 Door 2 $ 613 Estimated Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant 333528 LS 2 $ 27 Estimated 1 ,1 11JI D 1345 lm:\n,a rupois woeI n penal, EA ijilS: ~ n ~ I 1 1 I: 1111Sret:I P4 Interior Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. EA-039 177122 Ea. 2 $ 190 Estimated HVAC End of Life: Cooling Packaged Units - Split DIX 15700-902 310527 720 SF 2 $ 6,484 Estimated Unit uires replacement P3 Technology Room lacks telephone wiring. EA-027 159114 Ea. 4 $ 167 Estimated P4 Technology Room has insufficient dataports. EA-022 142596 3 Ea. 4 $ 542 Estimated ,~ T I li:!\u0026gt;\n!rr I h:t,l\\o.is wma\n11017 Ea. ~ 'liT llj I Specialties Exterior Signage is missing and is needed 10430-001 68898 3 Ea. 3 $ 150 Estimated P3 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. EA-055 230200 Ea. 4 $ 434 Estimated 3 '-plld I ni l~i.k flP _m,i IITI,Quf\\101, E,l-:Jll51l 2\u0026gt;tn~ .!l~ 15\n- a\n[?: 111 a P3 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. EA-085 284029 8 SF Surf 4 $ 95 Estimated 6003 - Cato Elementary School 3129 A.P.P.L.E@, Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Page7 of 8 State of Arkansas 3129 6003 - Cato Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Cato Elementarv School Building: Title 1 Bldg Floor# Room # System Deficiency P4 Specialties Room has insufficient tackboard area. P4 Specialties Blinds are missing or in poor condition. A.P.P.l.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD EA-055 230199 EA-085 284028 SubTotal by Building Grand Total by Campus Qty UOM Priority Ea. 4 $ 8 SF Surf 4 $ 17 s 160 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 434 Estimated ' 11111,,i1 95 Estimated 12,336 2,906,069 6003- Cato Elementary School 3129 Page 8 of 8 State of Arkansas 3095 6003 - Clinton Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Clinton Elementarv School Building: Floor# Room# System Sile Site 111:1 Site Site 1~ Site Sile Site Site 511 Exterior HVAC Ela::irical Electrical Specialties Sp~lli.s Deficiency Asphalt requires replacement Concrete requires replacement - e.wsii1!' 1'qUirelEn !'PI !111 Asphalt Coating is missing and is needed Fence/Gate (Chain Link) requires replacement P,D - ~sflb ,ou !'r!.111a1 iny uMal~ lo ulkiing I ~ co n illnt ADA - Existing curb ramps are not fully compliant ADA - Accessible routes between buildings and i~cll ii,.\n~-.. ,,i,I [LIU 1211flp1,anr ADA - I nru,\n-, kl\" ~5 ..!J!! Ml II ~]i,!ltl. ADA - Access to playgrounds or athletic fields is not fully compliant School has insufficient football/soccer fields. Scl1ool '1es1nliU~ 11 ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant Computer room lacks independent AC. u: r W!:!1I h Pcile - P.arli\nl -~Ing n' ~ ., School site lacks appropriate lighting. School lacks an appropriate surveillance system. Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Deficiency Site Concrete requires replacement A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Deficiency Code AssesslD 02740-002 63471 02750-002 58325 )277 i-OOl!. - 7 5 02785-001 63472 02820-003 63476 Oll9a 331429 340899 331435 EA-007 107461 \u0026gt;U 10!33~ 331309 EA-025 110717 :im-OOi ~7 EA-041 106190 EA-033 113257 11:110. SubTotal by Building Deficiency Code AssesslD 02750-002 104582 Qty UOM Priority 11,000 SF 2,000 SF .:'F 93,000 SF 15 LF 18 L6 LS LS LS Ea. E:3 LS Ea. Ea. Ea. 2 2 C 2 2 :l 2 2 2 2 4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2 $ 4 $ 2 $ $ $ Qty UOM Priority 2,000 SF 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 18,629 10,831 ~ 3:\n!!! 138,189 325 ' B 117 468 111 117 34,649 \" 117 13,636 ' !IJ 2,437 20,411 !,Sil 305,916 Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated I:,. Ir !!!I Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated ~ 'rml!!tl Estimated Estimated ~111,1.\nI Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 10,831 Estimated 6003 - Clinton Elementary School 3095 Page 1 of 13 State of Arkansas 3095 6003 - Clinton Elementary School Campus: 6003 - Clinton Elementarv School Building: Elementary or Primary Floor# Room# System Exterior In Ii Interior Deficiency ADA - Accessible Doorways are not fully compliant ra,s firs lila :\nr~ ,n.~l!a umrm!!!:dU' VCT flooring requires replacement Deficiency Code AssesslD 332113 ~~1fI 09658-009 63481 Interior End of Life: Ceilings - Suspended Tiles require 09500-900 299532 Qty UOM Priority LS f', 4,528 SF 152,930 SF 2 $ 2 $ 2 $ replacement IB-ira .... .,._\n~-: ..~:._ . .~ . :_ , \"\n:11~,~-J!ll'flllt Interior ADA - Accessible toilet rooms are not fully compliant Interior ADA - Door Hardware is not fully compliant \u0026lt;I l111!La 'll'r ~om 1j. 1 I t~ n\\i!!-=! 11~rop11sV.!l!eii cn n 36 Interior 35 Interior 'ii I 11!\u0026gt;11Clf 33 Interior 33 Interior IH l11L~r1~ 01 Interior 30 Interior lnh1 I 32 Interior 32 Interior :11  ,1 ,t,o 29 Interior 12 Interior a 11111I1 03 Interior A.P.P.L.E , Magellan K12 Inc. 2004 Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Cl' u I !I app1opnala he Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Ola- ~Clll'l d  ~ill 1he. p~r1iilE Yis on -n!!L Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. li\"Jtr!Jm JJCJQler! aks. app1:,op (  o't Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. l'OOlll ~Gt - , lt1a aflllr,\nip11~r \\ Ii Classroom door lacks appropriate hardware. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. Classroom door lacks the appropriate vision panel. ~ EA-040 EA-039 A.I! EA-039 EA-040 r,.l)\nl~ EA-040 EA-039 E.6--0il) EA-039 EA-040 E\\A-038 EA-040 EA-039 cA4J D EA-039 322118 1 LS 2 $ 332119 LS 2 $ 79 t) ~\n182409 Ea. 2 $ 179035 Ea. 2 $ 1 e:r.1 E:: 1 . 179036 Ea. 2 $ 182405 Ea. 2 $ f,~06il ,~ 182428 Ea. 2 $ 179038 Ea. 2 $  _-\\I'll Ea 179039 Ea. 2 $ 182406 Ea. 2 $ rnm12 ~ \"' 182401 Ea. 2 $ 179033 Ea. 2 $ ,e!!!~\" ' 179060 Ea. 2 $ Deficiency Listing 01/20/2005 Repair Cost Life Cycle Status 3,798 Estimated\n,~17 1\n3tlrrta12d 22,450 Estimated 522,130 Estimated 759 Estimated 3B0 Estimated 1/4 ~- 439 Estimated 190 Estimated ~ ~ 1M 190 Estimated 439 Estimated so P-:11 1a~-i:f 439 Estimated 190 Estimated  0 I I ' 190 Estimated 439 Estimated IJI) - r-,:\n1?:1 439 Estimated 190 Estimated ]11110111 190 Estimated 6003 - Clinton Elementar\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_983","title":"Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/983"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["116 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nNORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED JAN 2 0 2006 A1VA LYS Is DESEGREG~'~NNi'~ITi ORING OF DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS District Level FRANCICAL J. JACKSO Director of Student Affairs North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Discipline Actions I School Year 2004-2005 District Level Elementary Middle Schools High Schools 9 Year Comparison Ref: DIS032 Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 4 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions DISTRICT LEVEL From AUGUST Through MAY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ========================-===---=--=-------=-========-=--======================== 09 S.A.C. 1961 55.2% 979 27.5% 394 11.1% 220 6.2% 3554 681 430 201 137 1449 10 HOME SUSP. 469 66.1% 157 22.1% 66 9.3% 18 2.5% 710 272 96 39 14 421 11 BOYS CLUB 316 58.7% 155 28.8% 51 9.5% 16 3.0% 538 187 96 39 11 333 12 E. I.C. 195 66.3% 70 23.8% 18 6.1% 11 3.7% 294 103 46 14 7 170 17 EXPULSION 2 50.0% 0 .0% 2 50.0% 0 .0% 4 2 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===============================================-------------------------------== 09 S.A.C. 1560 52.3% 860 28.8% 390 13 .1% 172 5.8% 2982 626 421 211 117 1375 10 HOME SUSP. 753 61. 2% 325 26.4% 110 8.9% 43 3.5% 1231 438 200 72 30 740 11 BOYS CLUB 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 4 3 1 0 0 4 12 E. I.C. 110 72. 4% 30 19.7% 11 7.2% 1 .7% 152 70 17 9 1 97 17 EXPULSION 11 52.4% 0 .0% 9 42.9% 1 4.8% 21 11 0 9 1 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------= COMPARISON ====------------------------------------------------------------------------==== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =-----------------------------------------------------------------------=======- 09 S.A.C. 401- 20.4-% 119- 12.2-% 4- 1.0-% 48- 21.8-% 572- 55- 9- 10 20- 74- 10 HOME SUSP. 284 60.6 % 168 107.0 % 44 66.7 % 25 138. 9 % 521 166 104 33 16 319 11 BOYS CLUB 313- 99.1-% 154- 99.4-% 51- 100.0-% 16- 100.0-% 534- 184- 95- 39- 11- 329- 12 E. I.C. 85- 43.6-% 40- 57.1-% 7- 38.9-% 10- 90.9-% 142- 33- 29- 5- 6- 73- 17 EXPULSION 9 450.0 % 0 .0 % 7 350.0 % 1 100.0 % 17 9 0 7 1 17 l l I I I I I Ref: DIS032 Date: 8/09/05 Time : 7 : 3 4 : 21 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions ELEMENTARY K-5 From AUGUST Through MAY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 Og_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 9-  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 228 65.1% 83 23.7% 33 9.4% 6 1. 7% 350 145 51 20 5 221 11 BOYS CLUB 0 Og_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 Og_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 194 66.2% 70 23.9% 18 6.1% 11 3.8% 293 102 46 14 7 169 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 Og_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 Og_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 0 g_  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 224 69.3% 52 16.1% 34 10.5% 13 4. 0% 323 129 34 20 6 189 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 Og_  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 110 72.4% 30 19.7% 11 7.2% 1 7 g_  0 152 70 17 9 1 97 17 EXPULSION 1 100.0% 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 Og_  0 1 1 0 0 0 1 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---=============-----------------------------------------------------------==--= 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 4- 1.8-% 31- 37.3-% 1 3.0 % 7 116. 7 % 27- 16- 17- 0 1 32- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 84- 43.3-% 40- 57.1-% 7- 38.9-% 10- 90.9-% 141- 32- 29- 5- 6- 72- 17 EXPULSION 1 100.0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 1 1 0 0 0 1 I l J 1 Ref: DIS032 Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions MIDDLE SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through MAY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 1199 55.6% 613 28.4% 218 10.1% 125 5.8% 2155 397 250 100 71 818 10 HOME SUSP. 50 58.1% 23 26. 7% 6 7.0% 7 8.1% 86 35 14 5 6 60 11 BOYS CLUB 246 59.3% 125 30.1% 33 8.0% 11 2.7% 415 131 71 22 7 231 12 E. I. C. 1 100.0% 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 1 1 0 0 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 0 g_  0 0 Og_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ========================================================-=-------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 839 52.0% 434 26.9% 254 15.8% 85 5.3% 1612 328 224 131 54 737 10 HOME SUSP. 199 53.4% llO 29.5% 52 13. 9% 12 3.2% 373 122 74 29 8 233 ll BOYS CLUB 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0 g_  0 0 .0% 4 3 1 0 0 4 12 E. I. C. 0 0 g_  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 5 55.6% 0 .0% 4 44.4% 0 0 g_  0 9 5 0 4 0 9 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ----=====---------------------------------------------------------------------== 09 S.A.C. 360- 30.0-% 179- 29.2-% 36 16.5 % 40- 32.0-% 543- 69- ' 26- 31 17- 81- 10 HOME SUSP. 149 298.0 % 87 378.3 % 46 766.7 % 5 71. 4 % 287 87 60 24 2 173 ll BOYS CLUB 243- 98.8-% 124- 99.2-% 33- 100.0-% ll- 100.0-% 4ll- 128- 70- 22- 7- 227- 12 E. I.C. 1- 100.0-% 0 .0 % 0 . 0 \"% 0 . 0 % 1- 1- 0 0 0 1- 17 EXPULSION 5 500.0 % 0 .0 % 4 400.0 % 0 . 0 % 9 5 0 4 0 9 I I I I I Ref: DIS032 Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. 11 BOYS CLUB 12 E. I.C. 17 EXPULSION Analysis of Disciplinary Actions HIGH SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through MAY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU 762 54.5% 284 191 69.7% 92 70 56.9% 56 0 .0% 0 2 50.0% 2 -----BF------ # REF PCT /TOT # STU 366 26.2% 180 51 18.6% 31 30 24.4% 25 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 17 6 12.6% 101 27 9.9% 14 18 14.6% 17 0 .0% 0 2 50.0% 2 -----NSF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 95 6.8% 66 5 1.8% 3 5 4.1% 4 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 1399 631 274 140 123 102 0 0 4 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------==== 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU ~ STU # STU # STU -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 721 52.6% 426 31. 1% 136 9.9% 87 6.4% 1370 298 197 80 63 638 10 HOME SUSP. 327 61.5% 163 30.6% 24 4.5% 18 3.4% 532 185 92 23 16 316 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 6 50.0% 0 .0% 5 41. 7% 1 8.3% 12 6 0 5 1 12 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------= 09 S.A.C. 41- 5.4-% 60 16.4 % 40- 22.7-% 8- 8.4-% 2 9- 14 17 21- 3- 7 10 HOME SUSP. 136 71. 2 % 112 219.6 % 3- 11. 1-% 13 260.0 % 258 93 61 9 13 17 6 11 BOYS CLUB 70- 100.0-% 30- 100.0-% 18- 100.0-% 5- 100.0-% 123- 56- 25- 17- 4- 102- 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 4 200.0 % 0 .0 % 3 150.0 % 1 100.0 % 8 4 0 3 1 8 I I I I I J Ref: Date: Time: DIS032S 11/11/05 6:51:45 School: 031 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ------===========-=--=--------------------==-========----====--=--============== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 20 58.8% 11 32.4% 2 5.9% 1 2.9% 34 16 5 2 1 24 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 8 66.7% 3 25.0% 0 .0% 0 8.3% 12 6 3 0 1 10 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 19 67. 9% 1 3.6% 3 10.7% 5 17.9% 28 7 1 2 2 12 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # REF PCT(+/-} # STU # STU # STU # STU ------------------------------------------------------------------------------== 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 1- 5.0-% 10- 90.9-% 1 50.0 % 4 400.0 % 6- 9- 4- 0 1 12- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 8- .0 % 3- . 0 % 0 .0 % 1- . 0 % 12- 1- 1- 0 1- 10- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 032 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ==========-==========--=-----------------------------==---------------========== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 1 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ----==============--------------------------------==-==========-------------==== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 0 .0% 7 3 1 2 0 6 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---==========--------------------------==================-------------------==== COMPARISON -----======-------------------------================------------------------==== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 3 300.0 % 1 100. 0 % 2 200.0 % 0 . 0 % 6 2 1 2 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 033 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. 11 BOYS CLUB 12 E. I.C. 17 EXPULSION Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM-----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 g_  0 0 27 79.4% 16 0 0 g_  0 0 49 84.5% 15 0 09-  0 0 -----BF-----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 g_  0 0 7 20.6% 4 0 0 g_  0 0 9 15.5% 3 0 0 g_  0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 9-  0 0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 09-  0 0 0 .0% 0 -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 9-  0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 Os,.  0 0 0 0 g_  0 0 -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 0 34 20 0 0 58 18 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 Os,.  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 5 1 0 0 6 11 BOYS CLUB 0 Os,.  0 0 .0% 0 Os,.  0 0 Os,.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 30 76.9% 9 23.1% 0 .0% 0 Os,.  0 39 17 2 0 0 19 17 EXPULSION 0 09-  0 0 Os,.  0 0 .0% 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 20- 74.1-% 6- 85.7-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 26- 11- 3- 0 0 14- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 19- .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 19- 0 0 0 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 035 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 05!-  0 0 05!-  0 0 0 Se  0 0 05!-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 53 79.1% 14 20.9% 0 0 Se  0 0 05!-  0 67 34 9 0 0 43 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 05!-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 72 74.2% 25 25.8% 0 .0% 0 05!-  0 97 40 17 0 0 57 17 EXPULSION 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================--------=========================-------------------------== 09 S.A.C. 0 0 Se  0 0 05!-  0 0 .0% 0 0 Se  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 67 84.8% 12 15.2% 0 0 Se  0 0 .0% 79 42 10 0 0 52 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 Se  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 54 80.6% 13 19.4% 0 .0% 0 0 5l-  0 67 34 9 0 0 43 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =====-==-=--=========--------------=============-----------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 14 26.4 % 2- 14.3-% 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 12 8 1 0 0 9 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 18- .0 % 12- .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 30- 0 0 0 0 14- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Ref: Date: Time: DIS032S 11/11/05 6:51:45 School: 037 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 21 77.8% 5 18.5% 0 .0% 1 3. 7% 27 13 3 0 1 17 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 23 50.0% 18 39.1% 0 .0% 0 10.9% 46 13 11 0 2 26 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ----===========-----------------===========================----------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 4 40.0% 6 60.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 10 4 4 0 0 8 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 10 71. 4% 3 21. 4 % 1 7.1% 0 .0% 14 7 2 1 0 10 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -=============--------------------=================-=-------------------======== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -----=======----------------------------=======-----------------------------==-- 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 17- 81. 0-% 1 20.0 % 0 .0 % 1- 100.0-% 17- 9- 1 0 1- 9- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 13- . 0 % 15- . 0 % 1 .0 % 5- . 0 % 32- 1- 1- 1 5- 16- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 040 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------=--=------------------------------------=-============================--- 09 S.A.C. 0 0 9-  0 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 38 44.7% 26 30.6% 18 21. 2% 3 3.5% 85 23 14 6 2 45 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 0 16.7% 0 09-  0 6 1 2 1 0 4 17 EXPULSION 0 09-  0 0 0 9-  0 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------= 09 S.A.C. 0 09-  0 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 55 64.7% 23 27.1% 2 2.4% 5 5.9% 85 23 11 2 1 37 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 9-  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 9-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 9-  0 0 0 9-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 0 9-  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU 09 S.A.C. 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 17 44.7 % 3- 11. 5-% 16- 88.9-% 2 66.7 % 0 0 3- 4- 1- 8- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 1- . 0 % 4- .0 % 1- . 0 % 0 . 0 % 6- 1- 1- 1- 0 4- 17 EXPULSION 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I Ref: OIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 041 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 Og.  0 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 4 50.0% 0 Og.  0 4 50.0% 0 Og.  0 8 2 0 3 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 18 72.0% 2 8.0% 0 20.0% 0 .0% 25 12 2 5 0 19 17 EXPULSION 0 0 g.  0 0 Og.  0 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =========================================================--------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 0 0 g.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 2 20.0% 0 .0% 8 80.0% 0 .0% 10 2 0 3 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 Og.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 0 g.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 4 30.8% 3 23.1% 5 38.5% 1 7.7% 13 4 3 3 1 11 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON ================---------------------===========-----------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. 11 BOYS CLUB 12 E.I.C. 17 EXPULSION -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU 0 0 2- 0 0 0 14- 1- 0 0 0 g.  0 50.0-% .0 % .0 % .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 .0 % .0 % .0 % .0 % .0 % 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 % 100.0 % .0 % .0 % .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 .0 % .0 % .o % .0 % .0 % 0 0 2 0 0 0 12- 8- 0 0 I I I I I J J J J J Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 042 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ---------------------------------------------------------------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 15 93.8% 0 Og.  0 1 6.3% 0 0 g.  0 16 9 0 1 0 10 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 g.  0 0 0 9-  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 0 9-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ----------------------------------==============-------=====-----------------=== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 19 61.3% 1 3.2% 11 35.5% 0 Og.  0 31 15 1 7 0 23 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 9-  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 9-  0 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 0 g.  0 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----------------------------------=======-=====------------------------------== COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---------------------------------------------------------------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 4 26.7 % 1 100.0 % 10 1000.0 % 0 . 0 % 15 6 1 6 0 13 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I ] l Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 043 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 09-  0 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 1 10.0% 9 90.0% 0 Og_  0 0 .0% 10 1 7 0 0 8 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 0 g_  0 1 100.0% 0 0 g_  0 0 0 9-  0 1 0 1 0 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----Bf------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REf PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---------==------------------=-==========================------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 09-  0 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 09-  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 20 62.5% 4 12.5% 6 18.8% 2 6.3% 32 11 3 3 2 19 11 BOYS CLUB 0 09-  0 0 .0% 0 0 g_  0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 0 O!l-  0 1 0 0 1 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 O!l-  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------------====------==----------------------------=-== COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBf----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ----------------------------------------------------------------------------==== 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 19 1900.0 % 5- 55.6-% 6 600.0 % 2 200.0 % 22 10 4- 3 2 11 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 1- . 0 % 1 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 1- 1 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 I I I I I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 044 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 4 2 1 0 0 3 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 13 59.1% 7 31. 8% 0 9.1% 0 0 9-  0 22 10 6 2 0 18 17 EXPULSION 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ------------------------------------------------------------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 8 100.0% 0 .0% 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 8 7 0 0 0 7 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 g.  0 0 0 9-  0 0 .0% 0 Og.  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 3 75.0% 0 .0% 1 25.0% 0 0 g.  0 4 1 0 1 0 2 17 EXPULSION 0 0 g.  0 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ----------------------------------------------------------------------------==== 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 5 166.7 % 1- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 4 5 1- 0 0 4 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 10- . 0 % 7- . 0 % 1- .0 % 0 . 0 % 18- 1- 1- 1- 0 16- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I J ) Ref: DIS032S 11/11/05 6:51:45 045 Date: Time: School: 09 S.A.C. 10 HOME SUSP. 11 BOYS CLUB 12 E. I.C. 17 EXPULSION Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 .0% 0 6 60.0% 3 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 .0% 0 4 40.0% 3 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -==================--------==================================-=------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 7 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 7 5 0 0 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ======================-=-=-=============================-------------------===== COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------= 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 1 16.7 % 4- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 3- 2 3- 0 0 1- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 046 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU ===================================-=-=========--------------------------======= 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 31 75.6% 5 12.2% 5 12.2% 0 .0% 41 23 5 5 0 33 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 1 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =====================================================--------------------------= 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 .0% 0 .0% 8 5 1 0 0 6 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =====================================================------=-======---------==== COMPARISON =====================================================---------------------====== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ===================================================--------------------========= 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 24- 77.4-% 4- 80.0-% 5- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 33- 18- 4- 5- 0 27- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C. 1- . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 1- 1- 0 0 0 1- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 048 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT /TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU =======================================================----------------=--====== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 8 61.5% 1 7.7% 3 23.1% 1 7.7% 13 4 1 3 1 9 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 9 36.0% 1 4.0% 0 40.0% 0 20.0% 25 6 1 6 4 17 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===================================================--------------------------== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 7 70.0% 0 .0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 10 4 0 1 1 6 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C 9 64.3% 2 14.3% 3 21.4% 0 .0% 14 7 1 3 0 11 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 =====================================--=--==========-----------------------===== COMPARISON =====================================================-------------------======== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU --============================================-----------------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 1- 12.5-% 1- 100.0-% 1- 33.3-% 0 . 0 % 3- 0 1- 2- 0 3- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 1 . 0 % 7- .0 % 5- . 0 % 11- 0 1 7- 5- 6- 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 024 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY RIDGEROAD MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 681 56.7% 341 28.4% 107 8.9% 73 6.1% 1202 156 106 34 34 330 10 HOME SUSP. 38 62.3% 16 26.2% 3 4.9% 4 6.6% 61 25 9 3 3 40 11 BOYS CLUB 81 70.4% 24 20.9% 8 7.0% 2 1. 7% 115 38 12 4 1 55 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 337 54.5% 193 31.2% 67 10.8% 21 3.4% 618 124 86 32 15 257 10 HOME SUSP. 52 57.8% 27 30.0% 10 11.1% 1 1.1% 90 37 15 6 1 59 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 0 .0% 0 . 0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 5 83.3% 0 .0% 1 16. 7% 0 .0% 6 5 0 1 0 6 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 344- 50.5-% 148- 43.4-% 40- 37.4-% 52- 71.2-% 584- 32- 20- 2- 19- 73- 10 HOME SUSP. 14 36.8 % 11 68.8 % 7 233.3 % 3- 75.0-% 29 12 6 3 2- 19 11 BOYS CLUB 81- 100.0-% 24- 100.0-% 8- 100.0-% 2- 100.0-% 115- 38- 12- 4- 1- 55- 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 5 500.0 % 0 .0 % 1 100.0 % 0 .0 % 6 5 0 1 0 6 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 025 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL --------------------------------==============================-----------======= 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- If REF PCT/TOT If REF PCT/TOT If REF PCT/TOT If REF PCT/TOT If STU If STU If STU If STU ---------------------------------------------------------------------------=-=== 09 S.A.C. 163 46. 7% 92 26. 4% 60 17.2% 34 9. 7% 349 68 45 38 25 176 10 HOME SUSP. 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 6 1 1 1 3 6 11 BOYS CLUB 32 47.8% 18 26.9% 10 14.9% 7 10.4% 67 22 12 8 4 46 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------=------------======= 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -------=------------=-=-=======================-==============-=------========== -----BM-----lf REF PCT/TOT If STU -----BF------ lf REF PCT /TOT If STU -----NBM----lf REF PCT/TOT If STU -----NBF----lf REF PCT/TOT If STU ----------------------------------========-=-------------------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 127 39. 4 % 61 18.9% 103 32.0% 31 9.6% 322 57 35 59 25 176 10 HOME SUSP. 29 35.8% 19 23.5% 31 38.3% 2 2.5% 81 21 14 15 2 52 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 100.0% 0 .0% 3 0 0 3 0 3 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=== COMPARISON -----------------------------------============-------------------------====--== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- lf REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) If REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) If STU If STU If STU If STU -------=------------------------------=--=-----------------------------====--==- 09 S.A.C. 36- 22.1-% 31- 33.7-% 43 71. 7 % 3- 8.8-% 27- 11- 10- 21 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 28 2800.0 % 18 1800.0 % 30 3000.0 % 1- 33.3-% 75 20 13 14 1- 46 11 BOYS CLUB 32- 100.0-% 18- 100.0-% 10- 100.0-% 7- 100.0-% 67- 22- 12- 8- 4- 4 6- 12 E. I.C. 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 3 300.0 % 0 .o % 3 0 0 3 0 3 I I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 026 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 57 55.9% 41 40.2% 3 2.9% 1 1.0% 102 38 27 2 1 68 10 HOME SUSP. 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 4 1 0 0 5 11 BOYS CLUB 23 39.0% 35 59.3% 1 1. 7% 0 .0% 59 16 24 1 0 41 12 E. I. C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===========================================================---------------===== 09 S.A.C. 105 59.7% 35 19.9% 26 14.8% 10 5. 7% 176 44 22 10 4 80 10 HOME SUSP. 42 50.6% 35 42.2% 4 4.8% 2 2.4% 83 25 26 4 2 57 11 BOYS CLUB 3 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 3 3 0 0 0 3 12 E.I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 ===================-----=--=========================-----------------------===== COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -================--------------=================-------------------------======- 09 S.A.C. 48 84.2 % 6- 14.6-% 23 766.7 % 9 900.0 % 74 6 5- 8 3 12 10 HOME SUSP. 38 950.0 % 34 3400.0 % 4 400.0 % 2 200.0 % 78 21 25 4 2 52 11 BOYS CLUB 20- 87.0-% 35- 100.0-% 1- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 56- 13- 24- 1- 0 38- 12 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 .o % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 027 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY ROSE CITY MIDDLE LEVEL ACADEMY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 22 75.9% 4 13.8% 3 10.3% 0 .0% 29 15 3 1 0 19 10 HOME SUSP. 7 50.0% 5 35. 7% 2 14.3% 0 .0% 14 5 3 1 0 9 11 BOYS CLUB 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 5 2 3 0 0 5 12 E. I.C. 1 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 1 0 0 0 1 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===============================================================-----------====== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 . 0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON ======================---==========================---------------------=-====== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU --===============-==-----------================-------------------------=======- 09 S.A.C. 22- 100.0-% 4- 100.0-% 3- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 29- 15- 3- 1- 0 19- 10 HOME SUSP. 7- 100.0-% 5- 100.0-% 2- 100.0-% 0 . 0 % 14- 5- 3- 1- 0 9- 11 BOYS CLUB 2- 100.0-% 3- 100.0-% 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 5- 2- 3- 0 0 5- 12 E. I.C. 1- . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 1- 1- 0 0 0 1- 17 EXPULSION 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time : 6 : 51 : 4 5 School: 030 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --------------------------------------------------------------------------====== 09 S.A.C. 276 58.4% 135 28.5% 45 9.5% 17 3.6% 473 128 72 25 12 237 10 HOME SUSP. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 b 0 0 0 11 BOYS CLUB 108 63.9% 45 26.6% 14 8.3% 2 1. 2% 169 54 21 9 2 86 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ---------------------============================================-------======== 09 S.A.C. 270 54.3% 146 29. 4 % 58 11. 7% 23 4.6% 4 97 113 84 31 12 240 10 HOME SUSP. 76 65.0% 27 23.1% 7 6.0% 7 6.0% 117 40 18 4 3 65 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 1 100.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 0 1 0 0 1 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPARISON ------------------------------------------------------------------------------== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ----------------------------------------==-------------------------------======= 09 S.A.C. 6- 2.2-% 11 8.1 % 13 28.9 % 6 35.3 % 24 15- 12 6 0 3 10 HOME SUSP. 76 7600.0 % 27 2700.0 % 7 700.0 % 7 700.0 % 117 40 18 4 3 65 11 BOYS CLUB 108- 100.0-% 44- 97.8-% 14- 100.0-% 2- 100.0-% 168- 54- 20- 9- 2- 85- 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 012 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 11/12 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 200 53.6% 66 17.7% 65 17.4% 42 11. 3% 373 99 53 46 27 225 10 HOME SUSP. 10 66.7% 0 .0% 4 26.7% 1 6. 7% 15 9 0 4 1 14 11 BOYS CLUB 15 51. 7% 5 17.2% 8 27.6% 1 3.4% 29 15 5 8 1 29 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -===========================================================-=--------------==== 09 S.A.C. 142 42.5% 101 30.2% 67 20.1% 24 7.2% 334 88 69 41 17 215 10 HOME SUSP. 59 60.8% 21 21. 6% 6 6.2% 11 11. 3% 97 52 18 6 10 86 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I. C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 1 100.0% 1 0 0 0 1 1 ==========================================================---------------======= COMPARISON =====================================================----------------------===== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---============------------------=============-----------------------------===== 09 S.A.C. 58- 29.0-% 35 53.0 % 2 3.1 % 18- 42.9-% 39- 11- 16 5- 10- 10- 10 HOME SUSP. 49 490.0 % 21 2100.0 % 2 50.0 % 10 1000.0 % 82 43 18 2 9 72 11 BOYS CLUB 15- 100.0-% 5- 100.0-% 8- 100.0-% 1- 100.0-% 29- 15- 5- 8- 1- 2 9- 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 1 100.0 % 1 0 0 0 1 1 Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 013 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 09/10 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 562 54.8% 300 29.2% 111 10.8% 53 5.2% 1026 185 127 55 39 406 10 HOME SUSP. 67 65.0% 26 25.2% 10 9.7% 0 Og_  0 103 37 13 6 0 56 11 BOYS CLUB 55 58.5% 25 26.6% 10 10.6% 4 4.3% 94 41 20 9 3 73 12 E. I.C. 0 Og_  0 0 Og.  0 2 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2 50.0% 0 0 g_  0 2 50.0% 0 0 g_  0 4 2 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU --===================================================-=----------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 579 55.9% 324 31. 3% 69 6. 7% 63 6.1% 1035 210 127 39 46 422 10 HOME SUSP. 167 56.2% 106 35. 7% 17 5.7% 7 2.4% 297 94 57 16 6 173 11 BOYS CLUB 0 0 g_  0 0 0 g_  0 0 Og.  0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 Og_  0 0 .0% 0 Og_  0 0 0 0 0 0 (j 17 EXPULSION 6 54.5% 0 Og_  0 5 45.5% 0 0 g.  0 11 6 0 5 0 11 COMPARISON -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------------------------------------------------------=== 09 S.A.C. 17 3.0 % 24 8.0 % 42- 37.8-% 10 18.9 % 9 25 0 16- 7 16 10 HOME SUSP. 100 149.3 % 80 307.7 % 7 70.0 % 7 700.0 % 194 57 44 10 6 117 11 BOYS CLUB 55- 100.0-% 25- 100.0-% 10- 100.0-% 4- 100.0-% 94- 41- 20- 9- 3- 73- 12 E. I. C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % o 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 4 200.0 % 0 . 0 % 3 150.0 % 0 . 0 % 7 4 0 3 0 7 I I Ref: DIS032S Date: 11/11/05 Time: 6:51:45 School: 020 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through MAY ARGENTA ACADEMY 2 0 0 3 - 0 4 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU -----NSF----- # REF PCT/TOT # STU --------------------------------------------=----=-==--====-==================== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 114 73.1% 25 16.0% 13 8.3% 4 2.6% 156 51 18 6 2 77 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 ------------=-=-===-============================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------=-============================================-------======== 09 S.A.C. 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 102 71. 3% 40 28.0% 1 .7% 0 .0% 143 46 23 1 0 70 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------------------------====================------------------------===== COMPARISON ----=========---------------========-----------=======-=----------------===---== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ---------------------------------=============--------------------------====---= 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 12- 10.5-% 15 60.0 % 12- 92. 3-% 4- 100.0-% 13- 5- 5 5- 2- 7- 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0 % 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E. I.C. 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 . 0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .o % 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Discipline Actions Schoo1Year2004-2005 I District Level Elementary Middle Schools High Schools I 9 Year Comparison J IJ IJ IJ IJ I J I J I J I I I I I J I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 09: SAC 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 BM BF NBM NBF  \"03-04 1961 979 394 220  \"04-05 1560 860 390 172  '03-04  '04-05 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 469 157 66 18 004-05 753 325 111 43  03-04 04-05 I J I I 1 I I I l I J I J I J I I I I I I I I 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 316 155 51 16 04-05 3 1 0 0  03-04  04-05 I J IJ I I J I I I J I I 1 I I I I I I I I l I 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 12: E. I. C. K-5 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 195 70 18 11 04-05 110 30 11 1  03-04 04-05 11 I I I I I 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions District Level Action 17: Expulsion BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 2 0 2 0 004-05 11 0 9 1  03-04 D 04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 09: SAC 1 _/ 0.9-v 0.8- o. 7 _,, o.\u0026amp;-v 0.5-v 0.4-  0.3 _,, 0.2_v 0.1 _v 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 0 0 0 0 C!I 04-05 0 0 0 0  03-04  04-05 I I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 10: Home Suspension ___,,....,...~~i\"I--'-\"'.\",\"..-.,_.- .. .. ~=~ -  - 250 200 150 100 50 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 228 83 33 6 GJ 04-05 224 52 34 13  03-04  04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 11: Boys Club ~- ~-~~~ 1 _/ 0.9_v o.a-o. 7 _,, 0.6-  o.s-v 0  4-V 0.3-\" 0.2-  0.1 _v 0  03-04 El 04-05 BM BF 0 0 0 0 NBM 0 0 NBF 0 0  03-04 D 04-05 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 12: E. I. C. K-5 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 194 70 18 11 04-05 110 30 11 1  03-04 04-05 L I I I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Elementary K-5 Action 17: Expulsion -  ~-~-~ 1 _/ 0.9-/ o.a-v 0.7-v 0.6- 0.5_/ 0.4-/ 0.3-v 0.2- 0.1 _/ 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 0 0 0 0  04-05 0 0 0 0  03-04 D 04-05 I - l North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 09: SAC 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 1199 614 218 125  04-05 839 434 254 85  03-04 CJ 04-05 J I J I J I J I J 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 10: Home Suspension BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 50 23 6 7 04-05 199 110 53 12  03-04 04-05 I  I l I l I l I l I J I I I 1 250 200 150 100 50 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 246 125 33 11 004-05 3 1 0 0  03-04 D 04-05 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 12: E. I. C. K-5 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 1 0 0 0 D 04-05 0 0 0 0  03-04 04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions Middle Schools Action 17: Expulsion 5-\" - 4.5 _v 4-V - ......... 3.5-\" 3- 2  5 _LI 2-v ~ 1.5 _v . .)\n',.,\n1 - , : '\\ 0.5 _/ - . 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 0 0 0 0  04-05 5 0 4 0  03-04 D 04-05 I J I I I I J I I I I 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 09: SAC BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 762 366 176 95 04-05 721 426 136 87  03-04 D 04-05 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 10: Home Suspension . . - - ... BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 191 52 27 5 04-05 327 163 24 18  03-04 04-05 ] I J I J I J I J I J I J I J I J I 1 I I I I I I 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 11: Boys Club BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 70 30 18 5 004-05 0 0 0 0  03-04 D 04-05 I I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 12: E. I. C. K-5 1 _/ 0.9-v 0.8 _v 0.7 _v 0.6- 0.5 _v 0.4-v 0.3-v 0.2- 0.1-\" 0 BM BF NBM NBF  03-04 0 0 0 0 D 04-05 0 0 0 0  03-04 04-05 6 5 4 3 2 1 0  03-04 04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions High Schools Action 17: Expulsion BM BF NBM NBF 2 0 2 0 6 0 5 1  03-04  04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 10 Year Comparison Action 09: SAC 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 BM BF NBM NBF  95-98 1052 446 410 140  98-97 1264 55 469 142  97-98 1801 862 547 132  98-99 1443 718 458 138  99-00 1468 662 401 139 00-01 1092 556 267 69  01-02 1276 574 354 107 D 02-03 1903 1050 512 172  03-04 1961 980 394 220  '04-05 1560 860 390 172  95-96  96-97  97-98  98-99  99-00 D 00-01  01-02 D 02-03  03-04  '04-05 I .l I -i I -l I l IJ I J I J I IJ I I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 10 Year Comparison Action 10: Home Suspension 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 BM BF NBM NBF  95-96 162 46 47 3  96-97 591 208 125 17  97-98 511 125 104 13  98-99 566 141 125 22  99-00 406 113 102 18  00-01 385 92 64 7  01-02 692 234 92 21  02-03 522 193 63 13  03-04 469 157 66 18 753 325 111 43  95-96  96-97  97-98  98-99  99-00  00-01  01-02  02-03  03-04  '04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 10 Year Comparison Action 11: Boys Club 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 BM BF NBM NBF  95-96 334 82 72 12  96-97 357 146 85 20  97-98 515 148 112 8  98-99 359 148 88 22  99-00 351 129 90 27  00-01 325 136 56 12  01-02 210 83 52 11 D 02-03 244 86 83 25  03-04 316 155 51 16  '04-05 3 1 0 0  95-96  96-97  97-98  98-99  99-00 D 00-01  01-02 D 02-03  03-04  '04-05 North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 10 Year Comparison Action 12: E. I. C. K-5 1600- 1400 1200 1000- 800- 600 400 200- \u0026gt;- ol ~ Mi. ~ I ---- BM BF NBM NBF  95-96 1563 492 510 71  96-97 154 30 32 3  97-98 0 0 0 0  98-99 211 106 27 6  99-00 246 63 75 16 El 00-01 162 55 40 21  01-02 342 164 67 29 D 02-03 252 97 52 11  03-04 195 70 18 11  '04-05 110 30 11 1  95-96  96-97  97-98  98-99  99-00 rn 00-01  01-02 D 02-03  03-04  '04-05 I I I North Little Rock Public Schools Analysis of Disciplinary Actions 10 Year Comparison Action 17: Expulsion 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 BM BF NBM NBF  95-96 2 1 0 2  96-97 3 7 0 0  97-98 6 5 0 0  98-99 7 2 1 1  99-00 3 0 2 0  00-01 3 0 5 3  01-02 1 0 2 1 D 02-03 2 0 2 0  03-04 2 0 2 0  95-96  96-97  97-98  98-99  99-00  00-01  01-02  02-03  03-04  '04-05\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1015","title":"\"Evaluation of SMART/THRIVE in the Little Rock School District, Research Report,\" , 2004-2005","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational innovations","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Evaluation of SMART/THRIVE in the Little Rock School District, Research Report,\" , 2004-2005"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1015"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["37 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nIncludes attached notice of filing with the United States District Court on December 27, 2005\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1086","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1086"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["88 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nRECEIVED JAN 2 1 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Agenda Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting Thank you, Dr. Martin Luther King January 2004 I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING January 22, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance- M. L. King Elementary School 111. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) C. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association D. Joshua lntervenors IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update G. Update: Division of Exceptional Children V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes: Special Meeting - 12-11-03 Regular Meeting - 12-18-03 B. Personnel Changes ,... n-.:i ,\na- -,~- r- - -4:I: Oz o  el~ m..,\n:a C: -z\n:an o'\"\" F~ (\")\"' ~ Regular Board Meeting January 22, 2004 Page2 VI. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION: A. Second Reading: Revision of Policy IKF - General Education Graduation Requirements VII. SCHOOL SERVICES: A. Magnet Schools Assistance Program Update B. 2004 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant Proposal VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property B. Financial Report IX. CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions X. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS XI. ADJOURNMENT ,... O'\"O ,.\u0026gt;,. ..:...,:m._0.. - ii: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ ::0 C: -z\non o-\u0026lt; F\nOU\u0026gt; ~ ~\n= mr-:-:oo gg iml:me -c: ~~ ~~ ~::l -mo:m:o ::0 u, i ,0. .. I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL 11. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS WELCOME/ STUDENT PERFORMANCL A. SUPT. CITATIONS B. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS C. LR CTA / D. JOSHUA INTEVENORS IV. REPORTS/ COMMUNICATIONS A. BOARD MEMBERS DATE: TO: FROM: '.\n4.n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge\" January 22, 2004 Board of Directors ~Id M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: ~11 Goodman SUBJECT: January 2004 Construction Report- Bond Projects The move into the new forty-four (44) classroom building at Mann Magnet Middle School was completed on time. Except for a few problems, it went well and classes were held for the first time on January 5th . Pulaski County Special School District has purchased five (5) of the portable classroom trailers. The remainder will be sold through an auction on February 3rd . The buyers will have until February 27th to move the portable classroom trailers from the site. The move into the new administration and media areas at Mabelvale Middle School has been completed. This construction project is almost complete except for the completion of remodeling two (2) classrooms and dealing with some site drainage issues. The planning process continues for projects at schools that have had little or no work done up to now. The development of scopes of work and the selection of architects and engineers will be completed soon. If you have any questions, please call me at 447-1146. 810 W Markham  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  www.lrsd.k12.ar.us 501-324-2000  fax: 501-324-2032 !II \"O m ~ zz rm CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I 1csrComplet1on Facilitv Name Project Description Cost Date .,B,,._ase_li_ne _______ ___,R__eno.:...v...a.c_ti-o-=n-_ _____________ $953,5~ Jul-04 Brady,______ Addition/renovation $973,621 Jun-04 Central Renovation_-_ln_ter~ _-_-_-_-_-___ $10,200,266 Dec-05 _Dun_ba_r _______ ..._R_e_n_o_v_at_io_n_/a_d_d_iti_on____ $6,161,950 , Aug-04 J. A. Fair 6 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music room addition $3,155,640 Feb-04 Mabelvale MS ~ R_e_n_o_v-at-io_n _____ ----- $6,851,621 De-c--0-3 I Partial Rep,_lac_e_m_e_n_t ______ ~::_-~-$11,500,000 Dec-03 Classroom Addition $2, 155,62_2__ Jul-04 Mann McClellan Parkvi~ - Addition-- ~ $2,121 ,226 Jun-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem ____ Renovation _ _ __ _ _ $ ( 193,25fr Aug-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS .Rencivatfon _ ~ $3,755,041 Aug-04 Southwest ---Addition ~ $2,000,000 Aug-04 Tech C- t-r / M_et-ro_R_e-novation 'Addition/Renovation - Phase II $2,7251000 Jun-04 Wa\"kefield ~ ebuild ---- $5,300,000 Jul-04 Williams Renovation - - - - - $2, 106,49_2 _ ---Jun-04 Wilson _____ _._Renovation/expansion - $1,263,876-- Dec-03 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - WINTER/ SPRING 2003-04 I I I Est. Comp1et1on Facilitv Name Proiect Descriotion Cost Date Mitchell __ Renovation $750,000 Aug-04 Rightsell Renovation $660,0~ Auq-04 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED I I 1 Est. Completion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Booker Electrical Upgrade __ ___ Unknown Unk Booker Roof $48,525 Unk Carver Chicot Chicot Cloverdaie Elementary Fair Park Forest Heights Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Henderson Meadowcliff Pulaski Hgts. MS Western Hills Woodruff - - Media Center Expansion - - Unknown Sound Attenuation \u0026amp; Fire Alarm --- $50,783 - Electrical Upgrade - - Unknown- Addition Unknown~ Addition - Unknown Remodel Unknown Remodel - - Unknown Roof Repair - Unknown - Addition - Unknown Lockers - - $75,000 Addition - Unknown Energy monitoring system installation _ Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC ~ Unknown Parkinq addition $193,777 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name Administration Administration Administration Administration Annex Alternative Learning Ctr. Alternative Learning Ctr. Badgett Badqett I l l csI. --Complet1on Project Description Cost Date Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system .. $55,000 Aug-03 Fire alarm $32,350- Aug-03 Energy monitoring system installation .,. _ May-02 Energy monitoring system installation $15,160 Oct-01 Energy efficient lighting _ $82,000- Dec-01 Partial asbestos abatement $237,237 Jul-01 Fire alarm - ~ $18,2~ Auq-02 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Bale Classroom addition/renovation I $2,244,524 I Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system I Mar-02 Bale I Partial roof replacement $269,587  Dec-01 Bale ,HVAC $664,587 Aug-01 Booker Energy efficient lighting $170,295 Apr-01 Booker I Energy monitoring system installation $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement $10,900 Feb-02 Booker Fire alarm $34,501 I Mar-02 Brady I Energy efficient lighting I $80,593 Sep-02 Brady 1Asbestos abatement $345,072 I Aug-02 Carver I Energy monitoring system installation $14,480 May-01 Carver Parking lot ! $111 ,742 I Aug-03 Central Parking Student parking I $174,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Stadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair I $265,000 1 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System $14,500 I Aug-03 Central Purchase land for school I Unknown - ~ ec-02 - -- Central Roof \u0026amp; exterior renovations $2,000,000 I Dec-02 Central 1Ceiling and wall repair I $24,ooo I Oct-01 Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation I - $80,876 Aug-01 Central !Front landing tile repair $22,470 Aug-01 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting $132,678 Jul-01 Cloverdale MS -- Energy efficient lighting $189,74~ Jul-01 Cloverdale MS- - -- -- _ Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd Energy efficien!.J.!ghting - + --- -- --- $90,665 Aug-01 Dodd - - Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile - $156,299 --Jul-01 --- - Dodd Replace rciof top HVAC $215,570 ~ g-02 Facilities Servi~ Interior renovation $84,672 Mar-01 Facility Services - - Fire alarm -- - --- 7 1Z:ooo Aug-03 - - --,.- Fair Park HVAC renovation/fire alarm $315,956 Apr-02 -- ~ gy efficient lighting - .. $90,162 - Fair Park Aug-01 ---~ Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceili~ $59,310 Aug-01 - ... - J. A. Fair EnergL efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 -- -- -+- - J. A. Fair Press box $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair - Security cameras -- ' $12,500 Jun-01 J. A. Fair ... $38,000 -- Athletic Field Improvement Jul-03 --+-- J. A. Fair Irrigation System $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs $391 ,871 Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC $485,258 Nov-03 Forest Park _piagonal parking $111 ,742 Aug-03 Forest Park Energy efficient lighting - - $119,788 May-01 Fulbright Energy efficient lighting ~ - $134,463 Jun-01 Fulbright - Energy monitoring system installation $1 { 950 +- Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units $107,835 - Aug-02 Fulbright Parking lot + $140,000 Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repair-s -- -+ $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin R enovation - $2,511 ,736 - Mar-03 Gibbs Energy efficien.!..!!_ghting $76,447 + - -- Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation $11 ,770 Jul-01 2 !II ~ ::0 z~ z ,m.. :n -I Pl % C:\ng ?i m CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Proiect Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 I Sep-03 Hall Asbestos abatement $168,222 Aug-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $42,931 Jul-01 Hall I Energy efficient lighting I $296,707 Apr-01 Hall Infrastructure improvements $93,657 I Aug-01 Hall !Intercom Feb-01 Hall 1 Security cameras $10,600 Jun-01 Henderson I Energy efficient lighting I $193,679 Jul-01 Henderson 'Roof replacement gym $107,835 I May-01 Henderson Asbestos abatement Phase I I $500,000 Aug-01 Henderson  Asbestos abatement Phase 2 I $250,ooo I Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 - I Jul-02 Jefferson - Asbestos abatement ! $43,639 I Oct-01 Jefferson I Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm I $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 Laidlaw - Parking lot -I $269,588 Jul-01 --- Mabelvale Elem. Energy monitoring system installation I $12,150 Aug-01 Mabelvale E-lem-. - Replace HVAC units I $300,000 Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. Asbestos Abatement I $107,000  Aug-02 -- - Mabelvale Elem. . Energy efficient lighting I $106,598 Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers $134,793 I Aug-01 -- Mann -- I Asphalt walks ! Dec-01 The total $1 .8 million Mann Walkway canopies is what has been I - - - -- Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement used so far on the --Oct-01 - Mann Fencing projects listed _ Sep-01 Mann - . Partial demolition/portable classrooms ~ completed for Mann. Aug-01 - M- cClellan ~ Athletic Field lmprovem~ $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan _J_rrigation Syst~ $14,750 Jul-03 - - ~-- McClellan Security cameras $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan Energy efficient lighting -- $303,614 - May-01 - McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,000 Aug-01 McClellan - -- -- - $4(000 - Intercom Feb-02 McDermott Energy efficient lighting-- -- - $79,411 Feb-01 McDermott - Replace roof top HVAC uni~ - $476,000 Aug-02 ~ Meadowcliff Fire alarm $16, 175-,---- Jul-01 -- --+- Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement - $253,412 Aug-02 T Meadowcliff Engergy efficient lighting $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 ~ - Metropolitan Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installation + $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting - $103,642 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 Mitchell Asbestos abatement - - $13,000 Jul-01 Oakhurst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 + Otter Creek Energy monitoring system installation $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting +-- -- $81 ,828 Apr-01 Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 - Parking lot - -- $138,029 - Otter Creek Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition -- $888,778 Oct-02  Otter Creek Parking Improvements . - $142,541 . Aug-03 $210,ooo - Parkview HVAC controls Jun-02 Parkvie-w Roof replacement $273,877- Sep-01 ~ Parkview - Exterior lights $10,784 Nov-00 HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls -+-- $301 ,938 -- Parkview Aug-01 Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 Aug-01 Parkview Energy efficient lighting I- $315,000 Jun-01 3 Facility Name Procurement Procurement Pulaski Hgts. Elem Rightsell Rockefeller Rockefeller Rockefeller Romine Romine Security/Transportation Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD JANUARY 22, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I Project Description I Cost Est. Completion Date !Energy monitoring system installation $5,290 I Jun-02 I Fire alarm ' $25,000 Aug-03 !Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 I Energy efficient lighting -~$_84,_8_98-+ ____ A~p_r-_0_,1 I Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 !Replace rooftop HVAC $539,175 Aug-01 I Parking addition $111,742 Aug-02 !Asbestos abatement $10,000 Apr-02 Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $3,534,675 ____M ar-03... .. . Bus cameras $22,500 Jun-01 I Asbestos abatement I $28, 138 Aug-00 New roof $690,000 ' Oct-03 !Energy efficient lighting ___ ..___ $168,719 Jan-02 I Drainage/ street widenrr,g- 1 $250,000 Aug-03 t:S::-:-t-ud-:-e-n-:t--A:-s-s,ig-_nm_e_n_t ---r.:Ecn--e-rg-y=m- on-ci,t,.o..-ri:n-_g_s-ystem installation $4,830-+----A,...u~g~-.0,.2. ~ Student Assignment I Fire alarm 1 $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation $275,000 ' Dec-01 Technology Upgrade 1 upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data ---l--'_ __N ov_-02... .. Terry , Energy efficient lighting $73,850 I Feb-01 Terry Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry__ __ Media Center addition $704,932_ ___S e~1p. 02... .. Wakefield 1security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield _-=_-=_-_-_-_ Energy efficient lighting _ -r- $7-4~, 7- 7-6~ 1 ---Feb-01 Wakefield Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 Nov-02 Washington - Security cameras -- + --$7,900 - Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting -- + ~65,281~-- Apr-01 Watson ---~E_n_e-rg=y~monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement -r- ~82,241 __ ~_:Q!_ Watson Watson Watso_n __ Western Hills Western Hills Western Hills Williams Williams Wilson Woodruff - __ E_n_ergy efficient lighting _ _ ~- _ $106,868 Aug-01 Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 _ =-~Major renovation \u0026amp; addition --- -l-- ~00,000 Aug-02 Asbestos abatement - $191,946~ Aug-02 Intercom - - _______ - $7,100~- Dec-01 Energy efficient lighting - +- $106,000 - Jul-01 Parking expansions _ $183,717 Dec-03 Energy efficient lighting _ _ ~ $122,719 _ Jun-01 Parking Expansion ~ - $110,000 Aug-03 -Renovation $246,419 Auq-02 4 !\" z... m\n,o\n,o ~~\n10  ... C: 0 ::\n0 ~ .:.n. ~ ::c C: ~ ~ m Date: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS January 22, 2004 To: Board of Directors From:@Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - January This is the fifty-first communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two middle school and one elementary school to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology Training a) Monitoring technology plans to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of uts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. !II ~ :\no is z z .m- .:.n. ~ :c C:\ng ?. m Audit Report - January 2004 Page 2 of 2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) a) b) c) d) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. Monitoring payroll for compliance with board direction and internal controls. Reviewing leave accountability system. Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. Assisted with ShareFest 2003, Saturday, November 1, 2003. Report online at lrsd.org Participating in planning for Day of Caring (April 17, 2004). Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Date: January 22, 2003 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors FROM: Lucy Neal, Director Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director Computer Information Services THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent Title/Subject Summary Objectives Expected Outcomes Population/Location Budget Amount Managers Duration Long Range/Continuation Technology Report  EETT grant funded online courses begin this week with 134 LRSD teachers, 46 NLRSD teachers, 70 PCSSD teachers, and 34 non-public teachers participating.  AETN and ADE have purchased rights to video clips that are correlated to Arkansas Frameworks. These clips are delivered over the Internet to all schools. We are currently testing the product on our network to determine the best way to implement without using too much bandwidth.  E-rate applications for 2004-2005 will be filed on or before the deadline of February 4. This year we will file for wide area network, local telephone service, long distance service, cellular phone service, phone system maintenance, LAN electronics, and television systems for schools with a high percentage of students who are eligible for free and reduced lunch.  To meet E-rate requirements, the state is requiring that each district revisit the approved technology plan in order to confirm that every project for which e-rate funds have been applied is thoroughly covered in the original technology plan. We are just beginning to evaluate our plan in light of the new requirements. Any addendum that we might submit is due March 5, 2004. To provide an update to the Board of Directors on the status of technology projects To continue to implement the approved technology plan NIA NIA Lucy Neal - Instructional John Ruffins-Technical December 18, 2003 - January 22, 2004 Technology Plan is approved from 2003-2006. DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS January 22, 2004 Board of Education J Beverly Williams, Director, Human Resources Dr. Morris Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Personnel Changes It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.C.A. 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 18, 2003 are considered intern teachers. ~ :S-f!l 1:::i:: ~8 -ore: (/) -om 0\no ?\n?i mm (/) Personnel Changes Page 2 January 22, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignations/ferminations Certified Employees Hawkins, Matthew Spanish 8-14-95 Reason: Leaving City DUNBAR 1-16-04 Heffern, Susan Kindergarten 10-25-99 Reason: Personal STEPHENS 12-19-03 Nichols, Karisa Alt. Skills 1-3-96 Reason: Returning to School ACC 1-5-04 Nichols, Karita Physical Science 8-19-98 Reason: Returning to School ALC 1-4-03 Walker, Charles NONE New Certified Employees General Science ALC 1-5-04 Certified Promotion Certified Transfer 4-09 TCH925 1-05 K925 4-07 TCH925 4-07 TCH925 4-07 TCH925 ANNUAL SALARY 37700.00 29609.00 35658.00 35658.00 35658.00 annual 18386.16 prorated Chase, Diann from Day Treatment at Romine to Psyc. Specialist in Division of Exceptional Children Personnel Changes Page 3 January 22, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE END DATE SALARY CLASS Resignationsfferminations Non-Certified Employees Bryant, Byron Custodian 10-24-01 1-02 Reason: Abandonment WILLIAMS 12-3-03 CUS12 Floyd, Stephen Custodian 8-27-03 1-01 Reason: Accepted Another SOUTHWEST 12-9-03 CUS928 Position Griffin, Robert Jr. Instr. Aide 9-2-03 1-10 Reason: Personal STEPHENS 1-4-03 INA925 Hall, Janet Bus Driver 9-10-01 3-05 Reason: Personal TRANS. 1-5-04 BUSDRV Mayweather, Louise Aide 8-26-91 1-10 Reason: Retired BOOKER 1-4-04 INA185 McTyer, Donald Security 8-22-94 30-14 Reason: Deceased HALL 1-10-04 ANl0 Millage, John Custodian 3-7-02 1-02 Reason: Leaving City CLOVERDALE EL. 12-17-03 CUS12 Rudkin, Pamela Secretary 12-12-00 31-20 Reason: Personal PARK.VIEW 1-8-04 CLK925 ANNUAL SALARY 13955.00 10329.00 14067.00 11899.00 14067.00 20712.00 13955.00 22656.00 .!J.,l z \u0026gt;z 0 ~ ti\u0026gt; ~ \u0026gt;o . C: ,~-~o c5c: -\u0026lt;:::\nu~ ~z ti\u0026gt; ti\u0026gt; oil zc: ti\u0026gt; .0.. . 0 z ~ \u0026gt;otn 1:::i:: .~,, 8,- C-,:, mti\u0026gt; ~~ mm ti\u0026gt; !Jl !I: ti\u0026gt; \u0026gt;.,, C) ~ ..z.,. ,.\nu 0 c3 ti\u0026gt; -,::. Personnel Changes Page 4 January 22, 2004 NAME Williams, Sarah Reason: Retired Bryant, Rodney MAglione, Yadina Smittie, Carol POSITION SCHOOL Custodian HALL START DATE END DATE 3-10-80 1-30-04 SALARY CLASS 1-08 CUS925 New Non-Certified Employees Instr. Aide CHICOT 1-5-04 Media Clerk 1-5-04 CLOVERDALE MID Care CARE 12-8-03 on-Certified Promotion 1-10 INA925 31-06 CLK925 1-14 CARE ANNUAL SALARY 13296.00 14067.00 annual 7375.67 prorated 14916.00 annual 7854.70 prorated 7.93 per hr. Carter, John 9.50 month district wide security to 12 month district wide security officer Non-Certified Transfer NONE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS Date: January 22, 2004 To: Board of Education From: Through: Dennis Glasgow, Interim Associate Superintendent of Instruction Morris L. Holmes, Ed. D. Interim Superintendent Re: Second Reading: Revision of Policy IKF - General Graduation Requirements Arkansas Act 1748 of 2001 required students in grades K- 9 to meet a physical training requirement of no less than 20 minutes of physical activity three (3) times a week for all students who are physically fit and able to participate. Since that time, Act 1729 of 2003 was approved to change the grade grange from K - 9 to K - 8. Since the K - 9 grade span was written into the Board policy and regulations, revisions are required to bring our policy and regulations into compliance with state law. The policy was approved on first reading at the December 2003 meeting of the Board. The regulations were reviewed at that time. Policy IKF is presented at this time for second reading approval. bjg .!.I,' z \u0026gt;z 0 ~ ~ \u0026gt;eon !IC :c ~8 .,, r-e:.,, .,,m ~~ mm.,, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IKF GENERAL EDUCATION GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS The Little Rock School District Board of Education believes that students should graduate from high school possessing the skills, knowledge, and attitudes needed for responsible citizenship, life-long learning, and productive employment in our modern economy. Programs for post-secondary preparation will be available to equip students for the advanced training that will be needed for the work of the 21 st century. The Little Rock School District will be responsible for providing the educational opportunities and experiences that will enable our students to take full advantage of post-secondary education and employment opportunities available to them after graduation. Diploma-Earning Options A student may earn a diploma from a Little Rock School District high school in one of four ways. Each has different requirements and different numbers of required units of credit. 1. Diploma from any of the five high schools for completion of the required 24 units for the classes of 2002 and 2003\nor the required 26 units for the class of 2004 and after. 2. Diploma from any of the five high schools for completion of the Little Rock Scholars curriculum of 27 units for the class of 2003\nor 28 units, including at least eight Pre-Advanced Placement or Advanced Placement courses, for the class of 2004 and after. Hall High School students may take University Studies courses as substitutes for Pre-Advanced Placement and/or Advanced Placement courses. 3. Diploma earned at the Accelerated Learning Center for completion of the 21 units required by the State of Arkansas. 4. Diploma with waived or altered requirements established by an Individual Education Program (IEP) team for a student identified with disabilities. Even though the graduation requirements may be changed by the Board of Education during the time a student is enrolled in high school, the requirements established for a student's graduation class (assuming graduation in four years of high school) are those he/she must meet, even though he/she may require more than four years to earn the necessary number of units. Units of credit will generally be earned in grades nine through twelve, except that one unit of Algebra I (or higher-level mathematics) and Level I (or higher level) of foreign language may be earned in grade eight. High school courses taken before grade eight will not satisfy a unit of credit toward graduation. (See policy IKEC for list of creditearning options.) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IKF (continued) Transfer Students All transfer students must meet the graduation requirements of the Little Rock School District in order to receive a diploma. The LRSD high school will accept transfer credits and grades for students who previously attended Arkansas .high schools that are accredited by the Arkansas Department of Education or out-of-state high schools that are accredited by their state department of education and/or a regional accreditation organization such as the North Central Association of Schools and Colleges. Additionally, students who transfer into a Little Rock School District high school from a home school must attend at least two semesters in order to receive a high school diploma (see IKED and IKED-R). Former home school students must attend at least four semesters in order to be eligible for rank-in-class (see IKC-R). Foreign Exchange students who complete the senior year in good standing may, at the discretion of the principal, participate in the graduation ceremony. Senior-Year Enrollment Requirements Students participating in dual-credit courses with local colleges/universities during their senior year must be enrolled in high school courses at least half time for their senior year (four units of credit) or full-time during the fall semester in order to receive a diploma from a Little Rock School District high school. This enrollment standard is required regardless of how many credits a student may need to satisfy graduation requirements. (See IKEC-R1 for regulations governing dual-credit enrollments.) Magnet Program Seal Students who participate in the District's high school magnet programs may meet the magnet curriculum requirements through completion of the designated Career Focus courses established for each magnet. In order to receive a Magnet Seal, magnet students must complete fill the requirements of the magnet program. Students transferring into a magnet program after the freshman year may earn a diploma from that high school, but they will not earn the Magnet Seal. Arkansas Scholars Seal A special Arkansas Scholars seal will be affixed to the diploma and transcript of a student who meets the following standards established by the Arkansas Scholars program: 1. Earn a grade of \"C\" or above in all courses. 2. Achieve a 95 percent or better attendance record for each of the four years of high school. 2 lo\u0026lt; n 0 \"z' C) ~ i \"' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IKF (continued) 3. Complete high school in eight consecutive semesters. 4. Complete successfully at least three units in science, three units in mathematics, three units of social studies, and four units in English. Honors Diploma Seal A special Honors Seal will be affixed to the diploma and transcript of a student who meets the following standards: 1. Completes the units required for the Little Rock Scholars curriculum, which includes and goes beyond the requirements of the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board for unconditional admission to any public twoyear or four-year institution of higher education in Arkansas and which includes, but goes beyond, the requirements for eligibility for the Arkansas Challenge Scholarship. The Little Rock Scholars curriculum also reflects the admission requirements of the most competitive universities in the United States of America. 2. Successfully completes a minimum of eight Pre-Advanced Placement or Advanced Placement courses over a four-year period. Hall High School students may take University Studies courses as substitutes for PreAdvanced Placement and/or Advanced Placement courses. Other approved dual-credit courses offered to LRSD students in collaboration with area colleges/ universities may also be substituted for the Pre-AP or AP requirement. 3. Earns a grade-point-average of at least 3.5. Students designated for valedictory or salutatory recognition must have completed the Little Rock Scholars curriculum. Recognition of Graduates Each high school may design its own traditions to commend and celebrate the achievements of the following sets of graduates: 1. the valedictorian and salutatorian\n2. students earning an overall average of 3.5 or above\n3. students earning Magnet Program, Arkansas Scholars, Little Rock Scholars, and/or Honors Diploma Seals\n4. members of the National Honor Society or similar honors organization\n5. scholarship recipients\n6. students with perfect attendance throughout high school\nand 7. students whose other achievements are worthy of special recognition. 3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: IKF (continued) Participation in Graduation Ceremony In order to be a participant in the graduation ceremony, the student must be within one unit of completing the graduation requirements and must have paid the tuition for the one-half or one unit to be taken in summer school (or, alternately, in another approved credit-earning program). All high school students and their parents will be informed in writing of this expectation when course lists and graduation requirements are published for the spring registration process. Principals will make a determination of potential graduates at the end of the junior year and each quarter of the students' senior year and inform students and their parents immediately if it is determined that the student is in danger of not graduating. Such students will be advised of all the appropriate credit-earning options, including, but not limited to, evening high school, summer school, correspondence courses, online courses, credit-by-examination, and placement at the Accelerated Learning Center. Award of Diploma The award of the high school diploma will not be made until all graduation requirements are met. Specific Course Requirements The following table specifies the required courses for graduation for each curriculum area. Revised: Adopted: July 22, 1999 4 High School Graduation Requirements Little Rock School District Required, Classes of 2002 and 2003 English-4 units English I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English Ill (ESL, Regular, PreAP, or AP)\nand English IV (ESL, Regular, or AP). Oral Communications-1 unit Communications I or Debate I Mathematics-3 units Algebra I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand Algebra II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP) or Statistics (ESL, Regular, or AP)\nand Concepts of Geometry (ESL or Regular) or Geometry (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) Science-3 units Physics I (ESL or Regular) or Physics I Pre-AP\nand Biology I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand Chemistry I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) Required, Classes of 2004 and After English-4 units English I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English Ill (ESL, Regular, PreAP, or AP)\nand English IV (ESL, Regular, or AP). Oral Communications-1/2 unit Communications IA (1/2 unit) English Language Arts-1/2 unit One-half unit from any English, Journalism, or Communications course. Modern Grammar (1/2) is strongly recommended. Mathematics--3 units Algebra I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand Algebra II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP) or Statistics (ESL, Regular, or AP)\nand Geometry (ESL, Regular, or PreAP) Statistics (ESL, Regular, or AP) will no longer substitute for Algebra II for the Class of 2007. Effective for the Class of 2007, four (4) units of mathematics are required in qrades 9-12. Science--3 units Physics I (ESL or Regular) or Physics I Pre-AP\nand Biology I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand Chemistry I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) 5 Required, ACC Students English-4 units English I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand English Ill (ESL, Regular, PreAP, or AP)\nand English IV (ESL, Regular, or AP). Oral Communications-1/2 unit Communications IA--one-half unit Mathematics-3 units Algebra I (ESL, Regular, or PreAP)\nand Algebra II (ESL, Regular, or PreAP) or Statistics (ESL, Regular, or AP)\nand Concepts of Geometry (ESL or Regular) or Geometry (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) Science-3 units Physical Science or or Physics I\nand Biology I\nand One additional unit Required, Classes of 2002 and Required, Class of 2004 and Required, ACC Students 2003 After Social Studies-3 units Social Studies--3 units Social Studies-3 units Civics (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) Civics (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) Civics (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) or United States Government or United States Government or United States Government (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand World History (ESL, Regular, World History (ESL, Regular, World History (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP or AP)\nand Pre-AP,or AP)\nand Pre-AP, or AP)\nand United States History (ESL, United States History (ESL, United States History (ESL, Reoular, or AP) Regular, Pre-AP, or AP) Regular, or AP) Physical Education-1/2 unit Physical Education-1/2 unit Physical Education-1/2 unit Physical Education IA Physical Education IA Phvsical Education IA Health and Safety-1/2 unit Health and Safety-1/2 unit Health and Safety-1/2 unit Health and Safety Health and Safety Health and Safety Fine Arts-1 unit Fine Arts-1 unit Fine Arts-1/2 unit One unit from art, dance, drama, One unit from art, dance, drama, or music or music Technology-1 unit Technology--1 unit None One unit from any of the One unit from any of the aooroved technoloov courses. aooroved technolooy courses. Career Focus-3 units Career Focus-3 units Career Focus-3 units Three units from any of the At least three units from any of Three units from any of the approved Career Focus the approved Career Focus approved Career Focus oroorams. oroorams. oroorams. Electives--4 units Electives-6 units (5 units, Electives-3 units effective for Class of 2007) A fourth year of both science and social studies is encouraged, as are at least two units of foreign lanouaoe. Total-24 units Total-26 units Total-21 units Although not required to do so, students graduating m 2004 through 2006 are encouraged to complete the requirements for the Class of 2007, especially the four units of mathematics in grades 9-12. 6 Little Rock Scholars Curriculum The Board of Education recommends that students elect the challenge of a more rigorous graduation plan than the minimum requirements, including at least eight Pre-Advanced Placement or Advanced Placement courses (or University Studies courses at Hall High or approved dual-credit courses). Little Rock Scholars, Class of 2003 Little Rock Scholars, Class of 2004 and After English--4 units English--4 units English I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand English I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand English II (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand English II (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand English Ill (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP, or AP)\nand English Ill (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP, or AP)\nand EnQlish IV (ESL, ReQular, or AP). Encilish IV (ESL, Reciular, or AP). Oral Communications-1 unit Oral Communications-1/2 unit Communications I Communications IA English Language Arts-1/2 unit Any one-half unit from English, Communications, or Journalism. Modern Grammar is strongly encouraQed. Mathematics--4 units Mathematics--4 units (in grades 9-12, class of Algebra I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand 20071 Algebra II (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) or Statistics (ESL, Algebra I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand Regular, or AP)\nand Algebra II (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand Concepts of Geometry (ESL or Regular) or Geometry (ESL, Geometry (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand One or more additional units of advanced One additional unit of advanced mathematics. mathematics for the completion of four units in grades 9-12. Science--4 units Science--4 units Active Physics (ESL or Regular) or Physics I Pre-AP\nand Active Physics (ESL or Regular) or Physics I Pre-AP\nBiology I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand and Chemistry I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand Biology I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand One additional unit Chemistry I (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand One additional unit Social Studies--4 units Social Studies--4 units Civics (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) or United States Civics (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP) or United States Government (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand Government (ESL, Regular, or Pre-AP)\nand World History (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP or AP)\nand World History (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP, or AP)\nand United States History (ESL, Regular, or AP)\nand United States History (ESL, Regular, Pre-AP, or AP)\nOne additional unit and One additional unit Foreign Language-2 units Foreign Language-2 units Two units of any one foreiQn lanQuaQe Two units of any one foreiQn lanQuaQe Physical Education-1/2 unit Physical Education-1/2 unit Physical Education IA Phvsical Education IA Health and Safety-1/2 unit Health and Safety-1/2 unit Health and Safetv Health and Safetv Fine Arts-1 unit Fine Arts-1 unit One unit from art, dance, drama, or music One unit from art, dance, drama, or music Technology-2 units Technology-1 unit* Two units from any of the approved technology courses. One unit from any of the approved technology courses. Career Focus--4 units Career Focus-3 units* Four units from any of the approved Career Focus Three units from any of the approved Career Focus oroarams. proQrams. Electives-0 units Electives-3 units Total-27 units Total-28 units *Students graduating m 2004 through 2006 are encouraged to take four units of mathematics m grades 9-12, although they are not required to do so since their plan only specified three units of mathematics. If they do choose to take the Class of 2007 plan, they may also reduce the requirements in Technology and Career Focus and have three electives instead of one. 7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DATE: TO: January 16, 2004 Board of Education FROM: Dr. Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: Dr. Debbie Price - Director of MSAP SUBJECT: Magnet Schools Assistance Program Report The Magnet Schools Assistance Program is in Year 3, the final year of the grant. The four schools involved are: Mabelvale Magnet Middle School, Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, J. A. Fair Magnet High School and McClellan Magnet High School. In each of these schools every child is in the magnet program and this grant has enabled these schools to implement programs both to attract new students, but also to provide an innovative program of study for the students in the attendance zone. The magnet programs for each school are: Mabelvale Magnet Middle School Medical Science Environmental Science Technology Technology Cloverdale Magnet Middle School School Engineering Economics Multimedia J. A. Fair Magnet High School Medical Science Environmental Science Systems Engineering and McClellan Magnet High Engineering Business and Finance Multimedia The report will be provided under separate cover. s ~\n= a, Cc: 0 C/1 Zz !:\nm i5 \u0026amp;l ~ i\u0026lt;l ~ m en ~ ?'\u0026lt; \u0026gt;::c ~,\n! 0::,::, C\ni::,Z ZC\u0026gt; :mI: \"' .z.. Date: To: From: Prepared By: Subject: Summary: Objectives: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS January 22, 2004 Board of Education Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools Linda Austin, Director of Planning and Development Submission of 2004 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant (MSAP) proposal The U.S. Department of Education has recently published the draft guidelines for the 2004 application for grants under the Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP). We are currently in the process of preparing for submission of a magnet schools assistance program proposal and seek Board support and approval. Attached are two documents required in the MSAP application process: 1) Voluntary Plan and 2) Board Resolution. The following schools are included in the proposal: J.A. Fair High, McClellan High, Hall High, Mabelvale Middle and Henderson Middle. The anticipated due date is March 5, 2004. 1) To eliminate, reduce or prevent minority group isolation 2) To develop and implement projects that will assist in achieving systemic reforms and providing all students the opportunity to meet challenging State academic content standards an_d student academic achievement 3) To develop and design innovative educational methods and practices that promote diversity and increase choices in public secondary schools and public educational programs 4) To provide courses of instruction that will substantially strengthen the knowledge of academic subjects and the grasp of tangible and marketable vocational, technological and professional skills of students attending the schools 5) To improve the capacity of the district, including through professional development, to continue operating these magnet schools is terminated 6) To ensure high quality education that will enable the students to succeed academically and continue with postsecondary education or productive employment ~?\u0026lt; \u0026gt;:r: E~ g,!!\noz z C) J::U\u0026gt; m .z... . Population: Duration: Total school student population at the targeted secondary schools (Fair, McClellan, Hall, Mabelvale and Henderson) Three-year period: July 2004 - June 2007 Projected Request: $7,500,000 over the three-year period Other Agencies: Participating schools have established numerous community and business partnerships to support their magnet programs. Recommendations: We recommend approval for submission of the 2004 MSAP proposal\nprovide support by adoption of the MSAP resolution. Attachments: Voluntary Plan MSAP Board Resolution LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT VOLUNTARY PLAN January 2004 The Little Rock School District (LRSD) plan meets the statutory requirements of Title VI of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, which authorizes the Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP). This plan approved by the Little Rock School District Board of Education in January 2004 will be submitted to the U.S. Department of Education for consideration in conjunction with the District's application for MSAP funding. Under this plan, dependent upon funding from the MSAP, the LRSD will support five magnet schools during the 2004-2007 MSAP funding cycle. One LRSD high school, Hall High School, will be redesigned as a school-wide magnet program. In addition, four existing magnet schools will be significantly revised to promote increased levels of student diversity and maximize students' access to innovative and rigorous coursework and programs: J. A. Fair Magnet High School, McClellan Magnet High School, Mabelvale Magnet Middle School and Henderson Magnet Middle School. These magnet schools will carry out the six objectives of the Magnet Schools Assistance Program. They will: 1) eliminate, reduce, or prevent minority group isolation\n2) develop and implement projects that will assist in achieving systemic reforms and providing all students the opportunity to meet challenging State academic content standards and student academic achievement\n3) develop and design innovative educational methods and practices that promote diversity and increase choices in public secondary schools and public educational programs\n4) provide courses of instruction that will substantially strengthen the knowledge of academic subjects and the grasp of tangible and marketable vocational, technological and professional skills of students attending the schools\n5) improve the capacity of the district, including through professional development, to continue operating these magnet schools at a high performance level after Federal funding for the magnet schools is terminated\n6) and ensure that all students enrolled in the magnet school programs have equitable access to high quality education that will enable the students to succeed academically and continue with postsecondary education or productive employment. Little Rock School District's 2004-2007 Voluntary Plan Strategies The linchpin of the District's voluntary plan strategy is to attract the significant numbers of non-minority students already residing in the Little Rock School District attendance zone -- who are currently attending non-public schools, being home schooled or attending public schools outside the LRSD District -- back into the district's federally funded magnet middle and high schools. All five of the federally funded magnet schools will be attendance zone specialty magnets. The federally funded magnet school programs serve every student enrolled in the school by virtue of their neighborhood attendance zone assignment. These schools are also available to students seeking school options or choices outside of their attendance zone schools: students from the neighboring Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) as ~?\u0026lt; \u0026gt;:r:: ~~ g,!! ::oz ZG'l !CU) .zm.. . majority-to-minority (M-to-M) transfer students.1 The PCSSD continues to operate under an active desegregation court ordered plan that stipulates the M-to-M transfer process with the LRSD. The two-pronged strategy that the LRSD plans to use to achieve its ambitious voluntary plan goals and objectives is as follows:  Innovative, standards-based curriculum design and implementation, to include the development and school-wide infusion of the instructional themes, supported and complemented by an array of thematically focused high interest magnet courses, related professional development and parent involvement initiatives, and collaborations with outside partners  Aggressive and targeted outreach and recruitment campaigns designed to attract a more diverse student body than is currently attending these schools. The LRSD schools are comprised of 73 percent minorities (Black, Hispanics, others (including American Indians and Asians) and 27 percent non-minorities (White). In contrast, the Little Rock community is comprised of a much larger percentage of nonminority residents (65 percent) and a much smaller percentage of minority residents (35 percent) than the LRSD. LRSD Students Attending Non-Public Schools. Research was also conducted on the non-public (private and parochial) schools in the area encompassed by the LRSD. There are 26 non-public schools located within the boundaries of the LRSD (parochial and non-denominational). According to the 2000 census data, these schools enroll a total of 6,405 of the city's 13,223 total white student population. As a whole, Little Rock private schools have added 135 students each year since 1970, according to the Census Bureau.2 The Arkansas Democrat Gazette reported on October 26, 2003, that since the census was taken, the LRSD lost almost 600 more white students. Among the 250 largest U.S. cities, Little Rock now ranks 9th with the largest proportions of their white students in private schools (48%).3 The 2000 Census data reveal that among blacks, 4 percent attend private schools. Substantial numbers of parents are electing not to take advantage of the public education system, and are instead incurring the expense of a private school education for their children. By choosing a private school education for their children, many nonminority families in the Little Rock community have segregated their children from the predominantly minority and relatively poor students attending the public schools. 1 The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986 provides agreement between the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District for voluntary majority-to-minority interdistrict transfers. 2 Arkansas Democrat Gazette, Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3 Source: 2000 Census Compliance with Civil Rights Requirements The Little Rock School District assures the United States Department of Education and the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) that the District's Voluntary Plan and the accompanying MSAP proposal complies with requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in that its use of race in the selection of students to attend its five magnet schools is \"narrowly tailored.\" The following section specifies how the Voluntary Plan -- and the Little Rock School District Magnet Schools Assistance Program overall -- is responsive to the five considerations established by the Office for Civil Rights. Whether the district tried or seriously considered race-neutral alternatives and determined that those measures have not been or would not be similarly effective, before resorting to race-conscious action The Little Rock School District MSAP initiative includes zoned attendance specialty magnets (J.A. Fair High, McClellan High, Hall High, Henderson Middle and Mabelvale Middle). The student admissions process for these magnet schools is designed to recognize attendance zone school precedence and to provide educational choice options that maintain student diversity to the extent practicable as stated in the LRSD Board of Education policy, School Choice - NEPN: JCA (see attachment). Zoned attendance magnets have clearly delineated attendance zones from which they draw their student populations, such that race is not used at all as a criterion in admissions. Every student residing within the attendance zone is admitted to the school should they so choose to enroll. The linchpin of the strategy in the case of zoned attendance magnets is to design, conduct, and monitor a targeted and aggressive outreach and recruitment effort to attract the populations of students needed to achieve the school-specific enrollment goals. This outreach and recruitment strategy is described in great depth in the Plan of Operation, and again in the Quality of Project Design section. Providing students with choice is a key component of the plan. School choice is viewed as a healthy method of providing opportunity for students to take advantage of unique curriculum offerings, special emphasis and program activities. The attendance specialty magnet schools are available to students seeking school options or choices outside of their attendance zone schools. Students from the neighboring district of Pulaski County may participate in these specialty magnets as M-to-M transfer students. If the number of out of zone applicants exceeds the number of seats available, a weighted random assignment process will be used to identify those students who will be assigned. Criteria indicators considered in the weighted random process include the student's race, achievement test performance and economic status (free and reduced lunch). A computerized lottery will identify the student population of these specialty magnet schools' attendance zones and then increase the likelihood that students of opposite attributes will be selected thereby diversifying the school's population. The selection process will be random. Academic examinations are not used in the selection of students for the specialty magnet programs. The scope and flexibility of the use of race, including whether it is subject to a waiver There are several aspects of the LRSD student assignment process that demonstrate its flexibility. First, because in our District we believe that from time to time students face situations beyond their control, Appeals Committee transfers are considered for \"Medical Hardship or Extenuating Circumstances.\" An appeals committee composed of five volunteers meet monthly to consider any requests submitted. The members serve staggered 3-year terms. The committee is composed of parents, teachers, or community representatives. Second, staff preference transfers are provided to children of LRSD employees who reside in the LRSD. Children of LRSD employees will be permitted to transfer to the school in which the employee is assigned. These assignments are based on space availability. Third, Act 624/1105 transfers provides students of any person who is a public school employee in one district and a resident of another school district the opportunity to be enrolled in and to attend school in the district in which the parent is an employee. The manner in which race is used, that is, whether race determines eligibility for a program or whether race is just one factor in the decision making process We have established earlier that in the case of our zoned attendance magnets, race is only one criterion for admission in the weighted lottery process. The duration of the use of race and whether it is subject to periodic review The Little Rock School District assures the Office for Civil Rights that it will formally review, on a periodic basis, any steps it may take which involve the use of race to determine whether the use of race is still needed, or should be modified. The degree and type of burden imposed on students of other races As noted above, the LRSD MSAP magnet initiative has designated five sites as federal magnet schools for the 2004 - 2007 program cycle, representing a broad array of program options and educational levels. In the event that a magnet school becomes significantly over-enrolled, parents may exercise the school choice options for other specialty magnet schools, stipulation/original magnet schools, or other attendance zone schools. Procedures are established that enable students to make application to enroll in a school outside of their designated attendance zone. Parents and students are informed of available options. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, improving the academic achievement of all students and maintaining an equitable, nondiscriminatory learning environment will forever be the core of the Little Rock School District's mission\nand WHEREAS, despite past efforts, there remain schools within the District where minority group enrollment exceeds 75%, thus constituting minority group isolation\nand WHEREAS, school choice is viewed as a healthy method of providing opportunity for students to take advantage of unique curriculum offerings, special emphasis and program activities\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools expand educational choices, provide meaningful courses of study to which students can relate and set high expectations for all students for further education and the world of work\nand WHEREAS, magnet schools enhance parental and community involvement and encourage the use of community resources, thus improving the effectiveness of education in our District\nand NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Little Rock School District Board of Education endorses and approves the Voluntary Plan for submission with the LRSD 2004 MSAP proposal to the U. S. Department of Education. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands on behalf of the Little Rock School District Board of Education on this 22nd day of January, 2004. Michael Daugherty, Secretary Tony Rose, President ~?\u0026lt;  ::c er\n: g2!! ::oz z Cl 31: (I) zm.. . LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: TO: January 22, 2004 Board of Education FROM: ~l Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. THROUGH: Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property Attached are requests to donate property to the Little Rock School District as follows: School/Department Central High School Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Wilson Elementary School Woodruff Elementary School Item $500.00 cash to be applied toward the completion of the reflecting pool $240.00 gift card Food coupons in the amount of $200.00 $400.00 cash to be used to purchase supplies for students in need $100.00 cash as a match for volunteer hours from Woodruff parent, Tamela Warren, who is also a Wal-Mart employee. Funds will be used to provide \"good conduct\" incentives for students. Donor Central High School \"Class of 1993\" Wal-Mart Super Center Burger King Elite, Inc. Wal-Mart #126 ~ n 5 \"z' C\u0026gt; i \"' Board of Education January 22, 2004 Page 2 School/Department Little Rock School District Copy of the book \"The Search for the Smell of Christmas\" to each student in 23 of the District's elementary schools. The estimated value of this donation (7,010 books @ $14.95) is $104,800.00. Aromatique, Inc. It is recommended that these donation requests be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board. LittCe 'lwck Centra{ J-fffJli Sclioo{ 1500 Soutfi 'Park Street Litt{e 'Rock, ..'A.rkansas 72202 'Phone 501-447-1400 :fax 501-447-1401 December 5, 2003 To: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Nancy Rousseau, Principal {'V Re: Donation to Little Rock Central High School The Class of 1993 very graciously donated $500 to Central High School. Their desire is that the donation goes toward the completion of the reflecting pool, with the understanding that the school will have a bench erected along the pool with a plaque stating \"Donated by the Class of 1993.\" It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. 0c. c , -. ,,..,., . . l.  0 _, .... i, Date: To: From: Through: Subject: School/Department December 15, 2003 Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. Angela Munns, Principal Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Dorothy Davis, Title 1 Liaison Donation of Gift Cards Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Gift Card ($240.00) Wal-Mart Super Center 8801 Baseline Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Jason Mans, Store Manager .... I L\"\" : a- t .    -,.,l. ,,, Date: To: From: Through: Subject: School/Department December 15, 2003 Darr al Paradis, Director of Procurement and Materials Mgmt. Angela Munns, Principal Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Dorothy Davis, Title 1 Liaison Donation of Food Coupons Donor Cloverdale Magnet Middle School Food Coupons ($200.00) Burger King Allied Food Industries, Inc. 3300 So. University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72204 Jeffery Williams, District Manager r.. , ,.., , ~ ,n- 0 \"z' c\n, i \"' ~ ?\u0026lt;  ::c ~~ O\n:o C:- ::oz zc\n, 3m1: \"' ~ WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL '\"F,zceffence ancl 'Equity in 'Ecfocation\" DATE: November 20, 2003 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement Dept. FROM: Beverly Jones, Principal of Wilson School SUBJECT: Donation Elite, Inc. of P.O.Box 4922, Little Rock, AR 72204, graciously donated $400.00 to Wilson Elementary to be used to buy supplies for students in need. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. 4015 Stannus Road  Phone (501) 447-7200  Fax (501) 447-7201  Little Rock. Arkansas 72204 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (~n 'E?(tenaea :fear 'Eaucation Schoo{' To: Mr. Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement From: Janice M. Wilson, Principal Date: December 8, 2003 Re: Donations Wal-Mart #126 has donated $100.00 to Woodruff Elementary, as a match for volunteer hours to our school from Woodruff parent and Wal-Mart employee Tamela Warren. We sincerely appreciate this donation, which will provide \"good conduct\" incentives for our students We recommend that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. Wal-Mart #126 Renita Thompson, Personnel Manager 700 Chenal Little Rock, AR 72211 Tamela D. Warren 912 Johnson Street Little Rock, AR 7204 - ..\n'.\":- r,:~:. C-..- L  1,-\u0026lt;0'- ~ .. ,f L~ .... . ~.:!\n'\\\n.\n-i:-: .... _~ ... ~~_.\"'~,~,\n,:-a .. _ t (..\nj -  ' ~ ~t ... : ... ::,.\n301 0 West 7th Street  Phone 671 -6270  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 ~?\u0026lt; \u0026gt;:c ~~ O\n,o C:\n, oz zc\n, 3: en .zm.. . Little Rock School District Department of Instructional Technology 3001 S. Pulaski Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 December 15, 2003 TO: Darral Paradis, Director, Procurement and Materials Management FROM: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services SUBJECT: Donation of Books Aromatique, Inc. of Heber Springs donated a copy of the book The Search for the Smell of Christmas to each student in 23 elementary schools. The value of the donation is $104,800. The contact information is as follows : Patti and Dick Upton Aromatique, Inc. P.O. Box 6000 Heber Springs, AR 72543 It is recommended that this donation be accepted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Little Rock School District. \\ ::~. :::~ ... , .-::- ~ ........ , .. .. ,...,.. . -_\n~. , ... --.~ ~ . -~~~._. - .... ~ ,: ... : ,\\ ....... i  Little Rock School District Financial Services 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 447-1086 Fax: (501) 447-1158 DATE: January 22, 2004 TO: Little Rock School District Board of Directors THROUGH: Donald M. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer Morris L. Holmes, Interim Superintendent PREPARED BY: ~ark D. Milhollen, Manager, Financial Services  Subject  Summary  Objectives  Expected Outcomes  Population/Location  Budget Amount/Source  Manager  Duration Financial Reports District funds are reported for the period ending December 31 , 2003. To report the District's financial status monthly to the Board of Directors. The Board members will be informed of the District's current financial condition. NIA NIA Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services NIA  Long Range/Continuation Financial reports will be submitted monthly to the Board.  Other Agencies Involved one  Expectations of District N/ A  Needed Staff IA  Comments None ------------ ------  Recommendation Approval of the December 2003 financial reports. We recommend that the Board approve the financial reports as submitted. \\ ~?\u0026lt; \u0026gt;::r:: ~~ g2!! ::oz ZC'l\ni:\"' .zm.. . LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2003 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2002/03 12/31/02 COLLECTED 2003/04 12/31/03 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 58,550,000 57,147,781 97.61% 57,547,800 55,681,497 96.76% DELINQUENT TAXES 8,000,000 7,108,960 88.86% 10,100,000 8,793,799 87.07% 40% PULLBACK 29,400,000 29,600,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 187,000 210,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 385,000 180,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 135,000 220,757 163.52% 150,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 340,000 219,948 64.69% 380,000 225,933 59.46% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 275,000 68,627 24.96% 200,000 64,666 32.33% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 160,000 136,431 85.27% 240,000 142,937 59.56% TOTAL 97,432,000 64,902,502 66.61% 98,607,800 64,908,833 65.83% REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 24,000 11,170 46.54% 21,000 11,594 55.21% TOTAL 24,000 11,170 46.54% 21,000 11,594 55.21% REVENUE-STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 54,867,630 25,092,813 45.73% 53,226,139 24,193,699 45.45% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 7,590,000 3,891,937 51 .28% 8,300,000 3,373,820 40.65% VOCATIONAL 1,340,000 512,285 38.23% 1,400,000 521,646 37.26% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,700,000 320 0.02% 1,675,000 271,285 16.20% EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 136,486 49.93% 273,358 135,094 49.42% TRANSPORTATION 3,685,226 1,226,542 33.28% 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M 3,265,000 1,396,152 42.76% 3,900,000 1,473,688 37.79% ADULT EDUCATION 1,006,014 273,287 27.17% 920,337 311 ,832 33.88% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 658,607 329,297 50.00% 560,545 267,486 47.72% EARLY LITERACY LEARNING 120,000 TAP PROGRAM 285,271 142,636 50.00% 285,245 142,623 50.00% AT RISK FUNDING 650,000 57,386 8.83% 360,000 193,739 53.82% TOTAL 75,441,106 33,059,140 43.82% 74,776,187 32,128,752 42.97% REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 620,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,126,233 13,857 1.23% 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,664,438 554,813 1,632,430 544,143 33.33% TOTAL 3,410,671 568,670 16.67% 3,752,430 562,662 14.99% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 176,307,m 98,541,483 55.89% 177,157,418 97,611,841 55.10% REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 25,152,981 6,212,729 24.70% 24,075,790 7,040,060 29.24% DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 2,073,471 52.10% 4,000,000 2,368,924 59.22% MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 9,202,775 36.71% 24,689,351 9,316,330 37.73% TOTAL 54,198,923 17,488,975 32.27% 52,765,141 18,725,314 35.49% TOTAL REVENUE 230,506,700 116,030,457 50.34% 229,922,559 116,337,155 50.60% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2003 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED 2002/03 12/31/02 EXPENDED 2003/04 12/31/03 EXPENSES SALARIES 100,865,586 38,613,023 38.28% 100,684,982 38,826,959 BENEFITS 24,838,361 9,597,788 38.64% 26,483,772 9,621,831 PURCHASED SERVICES 19,795,774 8,031 ,646 40.57% 19,719,297 8,107,685 MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,347,098 3,485,453 41.76% 8,1 85,459 4,165,135 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,616,991 486,437 30.08% 1,575,580 549,257 OTHER OBJECTS 8,508,680 2,892,930 34.00% 8,384,567 2,957,578 DEBT SERVICE 12,217,048 4,880,555 39.95% 12,098,342 4,699,176 TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 176,189,538 67,987,831 38.59% 177,131,999 68,927,621 EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,148,726 5,908,341 22.60% 26,056,193 7,038,023 DEDICATED M\u0026amp; 0 3,980,000 1,082,832 27.21% 4,000,000 2,157,873 MAGNET SCHOOLS 25,065,942 8,567,693 34.18% 24,689,351 8,613,259 TOTAL 55,194,668 15,558,866 28.19% 54,745,544 17,809,156 TOTAL EXPENSES 231,384,206 83,546,697 36.11% 231,877,543 86,736,777 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (877,506) 32,483,759 (1 ,954,984) 29,600,377 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 1,645,440 1,645,440 3,558,580 3,558,580 OPERATING 8,557,652 8,557,652 9,026,855 9,026,855 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M\u0026amp; 0 649,695 3,575,548 1,578,177 4,474,738 OPERATING 8,675,891 39,111 ,304 9,052,274 37,711 ,075 TOTAL 9,325,586 42,686,852 10,630,451 42,185,813 - % EXPENDED 38.56% 36.33% 41.12% 50.88% 34.86% 35.27% 38.84% 38.91% 27.01% 53.95% 34.89% 32.53% 37.41% ~?\u0026lt; ,. :c E~ g2:!\noz Z Cl :I: \u0026lt;J\u0026gt; zm ..... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01-03 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 2003-04 12-31-03 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 33,282.90 33,282.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 110,501.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110,501 .92 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 32,802.37 87,000.00 62,375.74 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS 18,614,545.40 190,056.00 9,130,717.54 8,409,848.55 1,264,035.31 SECURITY PROJECTS 42,273.97 2,153.87 511 .33 39,608.77 LIGHTING PROJECTS 29,869.56 7,679.00 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 2,768,579.81 1,520,796.00 2,199,600.26 532,441 .69 1,557,333.86 RENOVATION PROJECTS 31,306,506.59 166,300.00 10,725,369.02 10,332,104.46 10,415,333.11 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 2,335,019.24 939,378.26 9,913.56 1,385,727.42 SUBTOTAL 55,129,596.94 0.00 1,964, 152.00 23,067,273.69 19,284,819.59 14,741,655.66 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 444,618.31 1,000.00 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 22,074,599.23 (1 ,964,152.00) 20,110,447.23 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 7,288,776.89 590,584.17 7,879,361 .06 SUBTOTAL 31,107,082.11 591 ,584.17 (1 ,964,152.00) 0.00 0.00 29,734,514.28 GRAND TOTAL llli\ni~z lll!l l!Z ~Ill ~~ lZ Q.l2!l i~ !lliZ in fill ll! i~,llll! ~I! :li ~llli liZl llli I Fund j Purchase Date t L Operating 07-19-03 Operating 12-30-03 Operating 12-19-03 Operating 12-19-03 Operating 12-19-03 Operating 12-19-03 Total Food Service 12-22-03 Activity Fund 12-19-03 Total Bond Account 09-08-03 Capital Projects Fund 01-17-03 Capital Projects Fund 01-17-03 Capital Projects Fund 10-15-03 Capital Projects Fund 01 -29-03 Capital Projects Fund 01-17-03 Capital Projects Fund 11 -18-03 Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 Capital Projects Fund 01-22-03 Capital Projects Fund 05-15-03 Capital Projects Fund 12-01-03 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-03 Capital Projects Fund 12-19-03 Total Deseg Plan Scholarship 12-05-03 Total Rockefeller Scholarship 06-24-03 Total Risk Management loss Fund 12-16-03 lN3WN~morov Ix SONIMV3H x LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 - - - - - - l - - - -- Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal I - - Date - - - - -  -- - -- 01 -19-04 Regions 0.945% Money Market - 20,000.00 I TFN Bank of America 0.820% Repo 17,725,000.00 01-15-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,000,000.00 02-02-04 I Twin City Bank 1.350% co 9,500,000.00 I 02-13-04 Twin City Bank 1.350% CD 5,000,000.00 03-01-04 Twin City Bank 1.400% CD 9,600,000.00 __ 46,845,000.00  - i - TFN Bank of America 0.710% Repo 910,000.00 i!._0,000.00 -- TFN Bank of America 0.780% Repo 1,280,000.00 f- - - 1,280,00.Q,00  - - - 03-08-04 Regions 1.094% CD 400,000.00 01-16-04 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 01-16-04 Bank of the Ozarks 2.250% CD 5,116,598.09 02-13-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 5,000,000.00 01-29-04 Bancorp South 2.000% CD 2,058,896.90 01-16-04 Superior 2.250% CD 2,500,000.00 04-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.300% CD 6,000,000.00 08-16-04 USBANK 1.420% - CD 11,000,000.00 01-16-04 Bank of America 1.240% Treasury Bills 5,299,646.43 05-14-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.360% CD 9,000,000.00 05-03-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.250% CD 3,060,648.33 03-15-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.430% CD 10,221,001 .82 TFN Bank of America 0.780% Repo 4,840,000.00 - _ 65,497,725.88 - 06-15-04 Bank of America 1.020% Treasury Bills 668,325.28 668,325.28 - -- 01-15-04 Bank of America 0.760% Treasury Bills 250,909.40 I 250,909.40 - - - - TFN f Bank of America 0.780% Repo 500,000.00 500,000.00 S\u0026gt;tMVW3M ONIS01:\u0026gt; \"XI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 I PROJECT I ENDING ALLOCATIONS EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ALLOCATION PROJECT CATEGORIES THRU 12-31-03 2000-01 2001-02 I 2002-03 THRU 12-31-03 THRU 12-31-03 SUBTOTAL 12-31-03 . I I ADMINISTRATION 673,846.55 889,772.32 I (485,325.77)1 149,597.63 62,375.74 0.00 616,419.92 57,426.63 NEW WORK PROJECTS i 35,509. 116.80 I 443,467.00 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 9,130,717.54 8,409,848.55 34,245,081.49 1,264,035.31 SECURITY PROJECTS ' 265,814.17 113,930.47 109,609.73 2,153.87 511.33 226,205.40 39,608.77 LIGHTING PROJECTS ' 4,883,405.13 2,641,482.13 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 7,679.00 0.00 4,861,214.57 22,190.56 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 12,754,406.51 791,385.63 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 2,199,600.26 532,441 .69 11 ,197,072.65 1,557,333.86 RENOVATION PROJECTS 51,655,707.04 397,615.34 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 10,725,369.02 10,332,104.46 41,240,373.93 10,415,333.11 - TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 11 ,735,611.78 575,016.53 I 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 939,378.26 9,913.56 10,349,884.36 1,385,727.42 I - UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS 21,404,268.20 I 21,404,268.20 TOTAL 138,882,116.18 I 5,852.669.42 I 18,708,823.32 35,822,666.30 23,067,273.69 19,284,819.59 102,736,252.32 36,145,923.86 r I . - j I -  f 1 - - - - - 1 - .. - -\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1440","title":"\"2003-04 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2003-12-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School improvement programs","School integration","School management and organization","Magnet schools"],"dcterms_title":["\"2003-04 Enrollment and Racial Balance in the Little Rock School District and Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1440"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["24 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":10,"next_page":11,"prev_page":9,"total_pages":48,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":108,"total_count":567,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":90},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":73},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":53},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":33},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":6},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":5},{"value":"Office of Education and Lead Planning and Desegregation","hits":5},{"value":"Center for Research in Educational Policy, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee","hits":3},{"value":"Ross, Steven M.","hits":3},{"value":"William Gordon Associates","hits":3},{"value":"Area School Advisory Committee","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":567},{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":561},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":400},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":376},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":351},{"value":"School integration","hits":176},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":174},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":173},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":156},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":151},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","hits":144}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":566},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":565},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":555},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":486},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1},{"value":"United States, Massachusetts, Middlesex County, Cambridge, Harvard University, 42.377, -71.11666","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":566},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":129},{"value":"1995","hits":120},{"value":"1996","hits":107},{"value":"1993","hits":98},{"value":"1997","hits":93},{"value":"1992","hits":85},{"value":"1998","hits":82},{"value":"1999","hits":81},{"value":"2000","hits":78},{"value":"1991","hits":77},{"value":"2001","hits":72},{"value":"2003","hits":62},{"value":"1990","hits":53},{"value":"2002","hits":53},{"value":"2004","hits":50},{"value":"2005","hits":47},{"value":"1989","hits":39},{"value":"2006","hits":31},{"value":"1988","hits":24},{"value":"2010","hits":21},{"value":"2008","hits":19},{"value":"2009","hits":17},{"value":"2007","hits":15},{"value":"2013","hits":15},{"value":"1986","hits":14},{"value":"2012","hits":14},{"value":"1987","hits":13},{"value":"2011","hits":9},{"value":"1984","hits":8},{"value":"1985","hits":8},{"value":"2014","hits":6},{"value":"1974","hits":4},{"value":"1975","hits":4},{"value":"1976","hits":4},{"value":"1977","hits":4},{"value":"1978","hits":4},{"value":"1979","hits":4},{"value":"1980","hits":4},{"value":"1981","hits":4},{"value":"1982","hits":4},{"value":"1983","hits":4},{"value":"1973","hits":3},{"value":"1950","hits":2},{"value":"1951","hits":2},{"value":"1952","hits":2},{"value":"1953","hits":2},{"value":"1954","hits":2},{"value":"1955","hits":2},{"value":"1956","hits":2},{"value":"1957","hits":2},{"value":"1958","hits":2},{"value":"1959","hits":2},{"value":"1960","hits":2},{"value":"1961","hits":2},{"value":"1962","hits":2},{"value":"1963","hits":2},{"value":"1964","hits":2},{"value":"1965","hits":2},{"value":"1966","hits":2},{"value":"1967","hits":2},{"value":"1968","hits":2},{"value":"1969","hits":2},{"value":"1970","hits":2},{"value":"1971","hits":2},{"value":"1972","hits":2},{"value":"2015","hits":1},{"value":"2016","hits":1},{"value":"2017","hits":1},{"value":"2018","hits":1},{"value":"2019","hits":1},{"value":"2020","hits":1},{"value":"2021","hits":1},{"value":"2022","hits":1},{"value":"2023","hits":1},{"value":"2024","hits":1},{"value":"2025","hits":1},{"value":"2026","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2026","count":1641,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":282},{"value":"reports","hits":194},{"value":"filing","hits":49},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":34},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16},{"value":"minutes (administrative records)","hits":16},{"value":"correspondence","hits":3},{"value":"books","hits":2},{"value":"newspaper clippings","hits":2},{"value":"printouts","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":566}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":566},{"value":"Collection","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":567}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}