{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1302","title":"Parent Committee: Pulaski County Special School District, in-service training","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","School employees","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Parent Committee: Pulaski County Special School District, in-service training"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1302"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["125 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1266","title":"Parent Committee: Pulaski County Special School District, interdistrict schools","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","Schools","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Parent Committee: Pulaski County Special School District, interdistrict schools"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1266"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["63 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1243","title":"Parent Committee recommendations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School employees","School facilities","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Parent Committee recommendations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1243"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["214 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1274","title":"Parent Committee recommendations","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational planning","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Parent Committee recommendations"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1274"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["162 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_985","title":"Personnel Directory, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/1990"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School administrators","School employees","School management and organization","School principals","School board members","School superintendents","Teachers"],"dcterms_title":["Personnel Directory, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/985"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["42 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nPersonnel Directory North Little Rock School District 1989-90 ----------------- NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent 1989 - 1990 SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, ArkQnsas BOARD OF EDUCATION J. W. Johnson, President (September, 1991) Shiloh Baptist Church, NLR Dixie Hdrrison, Vice Presideut (September, 1990) Swink \u0026amp; Company, Inc., LR Mable Mitchell, Secretary (September, 1992) East End Community Center, LR Prentice Dupins, Member (September, 1991) Sylvan Hills High Scnoul Lynn Hdffiilton, Member (September, 1991) Arkdnsds Demucrctt, LR Vicki Stephens, Member (September, 1990) CC Jones Produce Trucking, NLR Murry Witcher, Member (September, 1990) AP\u0026amp;L, LR 2401 Lakeview Road 72116 One Shady Valley Court 72116 5006 Glenview Blvd. 72117 2623 Li11coln Avenue 72114 4103 Arlingt0n 72116 45 Dove Creek Circle 72116 2013 Cedar Creek 72116 TOTAL NUMBER OF SCHOOLS IN DISTRICT Secondary: Senior Highs----------- 2 Junior Highs----------- 4 Elementdry ------------------ 17 Handicapped Center---------- 1 Skills Centtr --------------- 1 25 TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL IN DISTRICT Certified------------------ 681 Classified----------------- 509 TOTAL PERSONNEL------------ 1190 771-4506 753-1461 945-2431 7'76 '} I/ 945-4570 758-2209 835-4705 835-0009 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES AND SCHOOLS (Addresses/Telephone Numbers) Superintendent's Office---------- 2700 Poplar Street --- 758-1760 Smith, James ........ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 71- 61 0 0 Superintendent of Schools Bolling, Scharmel ...................... 771-6128 Coordinator-Informational Services Albright, Bettye ....................... 771-6100 Secretary/Board Mdtters Bynum, Mdble ............................ 771-6101 Ass't Superintendent-Persunnel Wooldridge, Avis ....................... 771-6102 Secretary/Personnel Collins, Sandra ........................ 771-2000 Secretdry Anderson, Donna ........................ 758-1760 Receptionist/Substitute Teachers Office of Instructional Services - 2700 Poplar Street --- 758-1760 Mou.ce, John ............................ 771-6111 Ass't Supecintendetlt-Instruction Linebdrger, Jo ......................... 771-6112 Secretary Crawford, Esther ....................... 771-6113 Di.cector-Elementdry Education Smith, Virginia ........................ 771-6115 Secretary Brown, Jane ............................ 771-6114 Director-Secundary Education Wastioi1, Doyalene ...................... 771-6120 Secretary Ballard, Bill .......................... 771-6138 Coucdinator-Instructiunal Services Barnett, Michelle ...................... 771-6133 Secretdry Martin, Letitia ........................ 771-6145 Cuordinator-Instructional Computers Staggs, Novd ........................... 771-6141 Coordiiia t.or-Ldnguage Arts McCauley, Glorid ....................... 771-6140 Sec.ctt\u0026lt;..:.ry Kincl, Ann ............................. 771-6135 Supervisor-Gifted/Talented/VIPS Gilkey, Barbara ........................ 771-6188 PAC/Social Worker McMillen, Mdrtha ....................... 771-6188 Homebound Teacher Hdr.cis, Cathy .......................... 771-6188 Homebound Teacher Richbourg, Mdry ....................... . Secretary Williams, Sharon ...................... . Facilitator-Drug/Alcohol Program Whitney, Kaye ......................... . Secretary 771-6194 771-6143 771-6218 Wdlker, Jess ............................ 771-6146 Coordinator-Mathemdtics Wise, Eugene ............................ 771-6127 Supervisor-Vocdtional Education Mills, Dean ............................. 771-6137 Secretary Matthews, Annette ...................... 771-6131 Vocational Evaluator Naylor, Janet .......................... 771-6131 Paraprofessional Phaup, Steve ........................... 771-6124 Director-Specidl Services Stokes, Phyllis ........................ 771-6123 Secretc1ry Smith, Glorid .......................... 771-6142 Supervisor-Special Education Dillinger, Rellid ...................... 771-6191 Supervisor-Specidl Educatiun Hudsoi1, Nell ........................... 771-6126 Secretdry Chdmbers, Dec1ne ........................ 771-6196 Secrt=tc1ry Moore, Nancy ........................... 771-6130 Psy...\nhologist CdITlp, Drew ............................. 771-6166 Psychological Examiner Spencer, Debordh ....................... 771-6189 Psychologicdl Examiw,:!r Woodard, Jdmes ......................... 771-6190 Psychological Examiner Im\ntructiunal Materials Cer1t.-,r dt Administrcttive Annex 22i1d and Popldr --------------------------------- 771-6199 Stewctrt, Jo ............................ 771-6198 Coordinator-Instructionc1l Mdterials, Mullen, Nell ........................... 771-6199 Secretury Boardman, Petrevia ..................... 771-6119 Secretctry Smith, Bi 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7 1-619 5 Electronics Technicidn Duvall, Billy .......................... 771-6195 Electronics Technicidn Dalton, Lewis .......................... 771-6199 Driver-Clerk Student Affairs------------- 2700 Popldr Street-------- 758-1760 Acklin, Bobby .......................... 771-6109 Ass't Superintendent-Student Affairs Juckett, Sandrct ........................ 771-6110 Secretary Stovall, Paul .......................... 372-6703 Supervisor-Trc1nsportcttion Dupriest, Johnnie ...................... 372-6703 Secretary Business Office------------------ 2700 Poplar Street --- 758-1760 Brown, Charles ......................... 771-6104 Ass't Superintendent-Business Services Watson, Mildred ........................ 771-6105 Secretary Daniels, Greg .......................... 771-6116 Director-Computer Services Holloway, Jim ............. ~-~ ........... 771-6117 Computer Programmer Morris, Nancy .......................... 771-6118 Secretary Mitchell, Ruby ......................... 771-6121 Head Bookkeeper Green, JuAnn ........................... 771-6122 Bookkeeper Black, Mikki ........................... 771-6129 Bookkeeper Williams, Theresa ...................... 771-6121 Bookkeeper Ward, Doyne ............................ 771-6107 Director-Purchasing Ness, Margaret ......................... 771-6108 Secretary William6, Tonya ........................ 771-6106 Production Clerk Athletic Department--------------- Stadium-------------- 771-6132 Goss, Gary, ............................ 771-6177 Directur-Athletics Coble, Ruby ............................ 771-6132 Secreta.i::y Maintenance Department------------ 2600 Poplar Street --- 771-6175 Massay, Jerry .......................... 771-6168 DirectoL-School Plant Services Cruwnuve.c, Alan ........................ 771-6179 Supe~vis0r-Scho0l Plant Services Stune, Georgia Ann ..................... 771-6175 Secretary McMunn, Kim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 71- 6176 Secretary School Food Services------------- 2400 Poplar Street---- 771-6170 Pearson, Jdffies ......................... 771-6171 Director-School Food Services Mabry, Vicky ........................... 771-6172 Coordinatur-Nutritiun Wirges, Elizabeth ...................... 771-6170 Secretary Ray, Kathy ............................. 771-6173 Head Clerk NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Secondary - 7 NORTHEAST High School ..... 2400 Lakeview Road Thompaon, Gregg, Principa~, 1412 Cornflower Wiseman, Ginny, Assistant Principal Jones, Charles, Administrative Assistant Gates, Judi, Secretary OLE MAIN High School ...... 22nd/Main .............. , Morris, James, Principal, 112 Oakridge Cove, Harper, Benny, Assistant Principal Wise, Willie B., Administrative Assistant Daniels, Peggy, Secretary LAKEWOODJu nior High ...... 2300 Lakeview Road Dyer, Jim, Principal, 2212 Cedar Creek Smith, Grant, Administrtative Assistant Lively, Bobbye, Secretary RIDGEROAD Junior High ...... 4601 Ridge Road ........ . Arthur Tucker, Principal, 1705 Jr. Deputy Rd., LR. Danaher, Kevin, Assistant Principal Vinson, Janet, Secretary ROSE CITY Junior High ....... 5500 Lynch Drive ....... . Kirspel, Ken, Principal, 5904 North Hills Blvd. Chun, Calvin, Administrative Assistant Jones, Kay, Secretary CENTRAL Junior High ....... 23rd/Poplar ............ . Morledge, Kdthy, Principal, 1707 Crestwood Road Warren, Shedrick, Assistallt Principal Willbanks, Mike, Assistant Principal Burrow, ShirlP.y, Secretary SKILLS CENTER ............. 22nd/Poplar ........... . Hawkins, Russell, Principdl, 2000 Schiller, LR Sartin, Lou Ann, Secretary Elementary - 17 753-5503 834-4829 771-6150 851-7565 753-5181 835-4833 753-6031 224-7289 945-1446 835-3369 771-6180 771-1901 771-6178 374-1869 AMBOY Elementary .......... 2400 W. 58th .......... 753-4381 Ford, Jane, Principal, 26 Coronado Circle 835-5591 BarnP.tt, Judy, Secretary ARGENTA Elementary ........ 13th/Main ............. 374-6943 Coomes, Pat, 259 Valley Club Circle, LR 227-8234 Hudson, Betty, Secretary BELWOOD Elementdry ........ 3902 Virginia Lane .... 753-5579 Jackson, Susie, 6407 Sherry Drive, LR 664-1729 Burns, Valda Jean, Secretary BOONE PARK Elementary ..... 14th/Crutcher ......... 374-8630 Siegel, Pat, Principal, 1712 War Eagle 834-2982 Snowden, Dana, Assistant Principal Oliger, Janelle, Secretary CRESTWOOD Elementary ...... 1901 Crestwood Dr. Wilson, Linda, Principal, 5708 Dublin Street McGohan, Carolyn, Secretary 758-0181 771-1951 GLENVIEW Elementary ....... 4841 Edmond ........... 945-3467 Allen, Harold, Principal, 412 West 22nd 758-6512 Rebsarnen, Pat, Secretary INDIAN HILLS Elementary ... 6800 Indian Hills Dr .. 835-5622 Smith, John, Principal, 909 Heather Circle, Conway327-2225 Begley, Vi, Secretary LAKEWOODE lementary ....... 1800 Fairway Ave ....... 753-3409 Power, Portia, Principal, 17 East Lake Dr. 771-2395 Holloway, Marion, Secretary LYNCH DRIVE Elementary ~ 5800 Alpha Street 945-3549 Hill, Dorisene, Principal, 2401 South Monroe, LR 664-2647 Magness, Shirley, Secretary MEADOWP ARK Elementdry .... 2300 Eureka Gardens Zeigler, James, Principal, 1517 Pulaski, LR Sartin, Mylindd, Secretary 945-7612 374-3517 NORTH HEIGHTS Eleme11tary .. 4901 No. Allen ........ 753-2120 Jackson, Fran, Principal, 2108 Whyte Drive 945-2240 Harper, Catherine, Secretary PARK HILL Elementary ....... 3801 JFK Blvd., ...... 753-9310 Murray, Betty, Principal, 5624 Applewood Rd. 753-4081 Wood, Sandy, Secr~tary PIKE VIEW Elementary ....... 441 McCain Blvd ...... 753-3639 Crites, Diane, Principdl, 5101 N. Hills Blvd. 758-8738 Thibault, Betty, SecrP.tary PINE Elementary ............ 19th/Pine ............ 753-9255 Lowe, Kaye, Principal, 6605 Allwood 753-0439 Zakrzewski, Mary, Se.crP.tary REDWOOD Elementary ......... 4th/Redwood .......... 945-2185 Chancellor, Linda, Principdl, 1801 Reservior Rd. 227-5026 Dokes, Vickie, Secrecdry ROSE CITY Elementary ....... Earle \u0026amp; School Sts. Harvey, Katherine, Principal, 7104 Talmage, LR Wise, Nancy, Secretary 945-1962 568-2063 SEVENTH ST. Elementary ..... 7th/Beech ............ 372-4660 Paul, Marbha, Principal, 59 Kings Park, LR 227-4055 TiptuH, Jedn, Secretary BARING CROSS CENTER ........ 10th/Parker .......... 374-1286 Kellar, Johnny, Principal, Box 186, Wooster 335-7105 Washburn, Mable, Secretary ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL ......... NLR Boys' Club ........ 374-0309 Wetherington, Jim, Director NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION AMBOY NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 1989 - 1990 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF PERSONNEL ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ABRAHAM, FRED L. JR. 4419 BARROW LITTLE ROCK AR ROOFER ZIP 72204 WAREHOUSE ACKLIN, ANETTE 753-3573 422 W. 21ST PLACE CHAPTER I AIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK ACKLIN, BOBBY J. 329-9838 RT. 6, BOX 476 ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPT.-STUDENT ACLIN, CAROL ANN 758-4802 1717 BERESFORD ARGENTA ADAMS, DON A. 771-4490 OLE MAIN ADAMS, JBSSIE L. FIFTH YEAR 4505 PIKE AVE CUSTODIAN CONWAY AR AFFAIRS 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-1004 1717 BEECH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE WORKER ALBRIGHT, BETTYE JO 753-4659 4513 OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, SUPERINTENDENT ALEXANDER, RICHARD C. 835-8207 6005 GLENHAVEN PL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN BASKETBALL COACH, HEALTH, ATHLETICS ALEXANDER, TULSA M. 945-9146 5907 E. 43RD ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE WORKER ALFORD, LEO RT . 11 , BOX 2 4 8 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL CROSSING GUARD ALLEN, CAROLYN H. 834-5351 508 N. BEVERLY SHERWOOD AR 72116 AMBOY THIRD YEAR ALLEN, DINAH M. 835-1968 7709 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS SIXTH YEAR ALLEN, EVA M. 18 JANA DR CONWAY AR 72032 PINE ALLEN, HAROLD 758-6512 GLENVIEW MEDIA SPECIALIST (*36/45) BLAKELY 412 W 22ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 1 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP ALLEN, SHIRLEY 376-6578 OLE MAIN ALLEN, SYLVIA 758-6512 CENTRAL ALLGEYER, DAVID 1624 SCHAER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER JO 412 W 22ND ST ENGLISH C. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 758-6173 CENTRAL 5901 J.F.K. ART PATRICK BLVD APT 3221 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMES, ALAN 753-4955 RIDGEROAD AMICK, KAREN Y. 771-2782 CRESTWOOD AMIS, GLEN PAUL 816 WEST 'D' 4909 LAKEVIEW RD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 888-4177 NORTHEAST ANDERS, CLEOPHUS 2915 DIXON RD #17 LITTLE ROCK AR PHYSICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCE *13/12 72206 888-4608 2506 LINDA KAY DR WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER ANDERSON, DONNA S. LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 758-0235 3116 N. MAGNOLIA ADMN. OFFICE RECEPTIONIST/SUBSTITUTE ANDERSON, SHARON A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 TEACHERS 834-1552 1609 SARATOGA CRESTWOOD FOURTH YEAR ANDREWS, MARYE. 758-6274 4009 ORANGE NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE WORKER ARMAN, MARY K. 945-0530 412 MEADOWP ARK MEADOWP ARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE ARMSTRONG, KAREN 771-4525 622 E. 19TH, APT 53 PINE CROSSING GUARD ARNOLD, MICHAEL 834-2855 105 ANN AVE. WAREHOUSE ELECTRICIAN ARNOLD, MITCHELL Y. 843-8042 RT. 5, BOX 49 WAREHOUSE LEAD ELECTRICIAN ASHBERRY, H, FAYE 753-7061 1700 W, 44TH AMBOY CHAPTER I AIDE ASHCRAFT, JOYCE D. 835-4171 6505 CORSICA DR INDIAN HILLS SIXTH YEAR ASHLEY, KATHY M. 771-4994 #4 CANYON CT. CRESTWOOD MR/LO RESOURCE 2 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOODA R 72116 CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT ASHMORE, REGINALD L. 371-0564 803 WALNUT BUS DRIVER ASKEW, NATHANIEL L. 371-0851 1523 W. 22ND ST BARING CROSS SELF CONTAINED MR ATKINSON, LARRY M. 11701 MARA LYNN #261 CENTRAL BAND DIRECTOR, GEN. AYCOCK, NANETTE P. 255-4640 BOX 474 ROSE CITY ELEM THIRD/FOURTH YEARS AYERS, BEATRICE 945-3731 P.O. BOX 531 RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN BABB, DENNIS D. 982-4179 1408 TAMARA PARK HEAD MECHANIC BABB, JULIE D. 982-4179 1408 TAMARA PARK BUS DRIVER BACCUS, GLORIA BELL 945-9483 1000 F STREET ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE WORKER BACKUS, BERNICE Y. 758-4568 314 W. 19TH ST. PINE FOOD SERVICE WORKER BADGETT, SUSAN R. 227-5683 8101 CANTRELL #1904 SEVENTH STREET SECOND YEAR BAGSHAW, EDITH A. 882-6583 RT. 2, BOX 50-A INDIAN HILLS SECOND/THIRD YEAR BAHIL, ELIZABETH ANN 758-2485 17 EMERALD CR ROSE CITY JR MEDIA SPECIALIST BAILEY, PAULETTE 835-7104 5805 EAGLE CREEK RD NORTHEAST ENGLISH IIR, IIIR, BAILEY, REBECCA S. 758-3620 6008 FOXBORO DRIVE BELWOOD SECOND YEAR BAKER, SHARON D. 753-6873 3902 SUSAN CIRCLE PIKE VIEW BAKER, SHEILA M. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 LITTLE ROCK AR MUSIC 72211 HAZEN AR 72064 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 BEEBE AR 72012 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLISH IIB NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 879-2459 RT 8, BOX 970 PINE BLUFF AR 71601 OLE MAIN OCC ENGLISH 10, 11, RESOURCE BAKER, TONYA R. 374-1397 1504 W. 13TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER 3 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP BALCH, BEVERLY A. 851-7935 OLE MAIN BALLARD, BILLY 834-0582 100 CEDAR LN., TRL #5 FOOD SERVICE WORKER D. ADMN. OFFICE BALLARD, FREIDA 6 PUTTER COVE COORDINATOR,INSTR. 753-3397 C. 2605 SHILL CT SECOND YEAR L. PIKE VIEW BARFIELD, DORIS 988-2361 RT. 3, BOX 202BBB SKILLS CENTER CUSTODIAN BARNES, ANGELA D. 225-1505 9309 CARNAHAN NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN BARNES, REGINALD E. 753-7703 809 VALERIE ST. ROSE CITY JR COACH, PB BARNETT, JUDY K. 753-5869 804 SILVER HILL AMBOY SECRETARY BARNETT, LOU ANN 834-3417 8313 TOLTEC COVE INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN BARNETT, MICHELLE S. 758-7316 223 EAST 'B' AVE ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY BARNETT, PATRICIA B. 835-1766 6713 PONTIAC LAKEWOODJ R BARR, SHIRLEY M. 753-5367 11 MCKEE CIRCLE RIDGEROAD NURSE BASSA, MARJORIE M. 888-7220 15022 SARA DRIVE BELWOOD FOURTH YEAR BATES, ANITA M. RD. 758-4616 3720 1/2 N SYCAMORE OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN BATTLES, AUTREANA M. 945-4230 RT. 4, BOX 136 D BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN BATTLES, PAMELA R. 945-7409 5303 CHIQUITO RD. BUS DRIVER BATTLES, REVA T. 329-5573 1028 DAVIS NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM COUNSELOR BAUMAN, ERNESTINE 374-1124 1311 W. 8TH ST. BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE WORKER 4 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOOD AR SERVICES 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP BEACH, SUE M. 753-7792 NORTHEAST 4822 ARLINGTON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLISH III, ENGLISH III CB BEARD, WILLIAM C. 758-3637 2203 COORS DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN SPANISH I BEASLEY, PENELOPE P. 663-2650 3822 W. CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 RIDGEROAD HOME ECONOMICS/CO BEAVERS, ESTHER L. 835-2667 6004 WOODVIEWS OUTH SHERWOODA R 72116 CENTRAL SE READING,SCIENCE,MATH,ENGLISH,GEOGRAPHY BEGLEY, VIOLET W. 834-1222 #2 BIG HORN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS SECRETARY BELEW, REBECCA J. 985-2941 102 FOX DELL CR. JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 ROSE CITY JR TMR BELL, ANITA J. 945-9449 2702 E. WASHINGTON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 RIDGEROAD AM HIST, COUNSELOR BENIGHT, PATRICIA A. 771-2616 310 EAST \"A\" NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SKILLS CENTER SPECIAL EDUCATION BENNETT, LINDA S. 834-1212 218 ALANBROOK AVE SHERWOOD AR 72116 PIKE VIEW GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE *44/32/45 BENNETT, SUE 758-0328 4512 VALLEY BROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST GUDIANCE COUNSELOR BENSON, PRISCILLA L. 834-8589 8209 TALL OAKS SHERWOOD AR 72116 NORTHEAST THEATRE TECH I,II BERRYHILL, BARBARA 758-7940 605 W. SCENIC Jl3 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 REDWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BEVILL, EDDIE C. 835-2371 6708 PONTIAC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FOURTH YEAR BIBLES, DANNA I. 945-3167 908 GREENDALE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE WORKER BIDDY, SUZANNE LYNN 758-1457 1812 WATERSIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN G/T FACILITATOR, ENG II, CHEERLEADERS BILBERRY, JUDY A. 455-1626 38 PLANTATION ACRES DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72210 RIDGEROAD EXP BUSINESS EDUCATION BILLINGS, JAMES M. 327-8993 3 CONCORD CONWAY AR 72032 OLE MAIN JOURNALISM, COMM 5 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP BISHOP, ROSIE 758-8767 CAFE. OFFICE BISHOP, ROY G 372-3770 LAKEWOODJ R BITTLE, DIEDRA L. 758-7717 LAKEWOODJR BIZZELL, LINDA 8'l5-7511 L .. CH DRIVE BLACK, HAZELL. 4902 N. SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE 2216 W LONG 17TH AMERICAN HISTORY E. 2112 MIDDLETON DR. EARTH SCIENCE s. 707 AUTUMNBROOKCR MR/LO RESOURCE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 376-9758 BLDG #4, APT 35, SHORTER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I AIDE BLACK, MICHEELA J. 753-5542 221 TEXAS AVE. ADMN. OFFICE BOOKKEEPER BLACK.WELL, MARY N. 835-0458 1227 COOLHURST SEVENTH STREET FIFTH YEAR BLEDSOE, SUE A. 771-4997 5904 N. ALLEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NORTHEAST COMPUTER SCIENCE/PROG. I, II, ALG. BOARDMAN, PETREVIA A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 75P 5196 4518 CRESTLINE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADM1  OFFICE SECRETARY-INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/TEXTBOOKS BOLLING, SCHARMEL R. 661-9226 424 N. PIERCE #35 LITTLE ROCK AR ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR-INFO. SERVICES 72205 BONA, S. RENEE 758-0376 REDWOOD BONNER, CHERI R. 3519 N. CYPRESS KINDERGARTEN 758-1800 4801 LAKEVIEW ROAD CENTRAL SOCIAL STUDIES BORDERS, MYRTLE L. 945-4216 6505 FARMSTEAD LYNCH DRIVE CROSSING GUARD BORDERS, MYRTLE L. 945-4216 6505 FARMSTEAD LYNCH DRIVE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BOWERS, BILLY A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 565-6741 6813 FAIRFIELD DR. LITTLE ROCK AR OLE MAIN FOOTBALL COACH, P.E., SAC 72209 BOWERS, SHIRLEY I. 565-6741 6813 FAIRFIELD DR RIDGEROAD ENGLISH SE LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 BOYD, MICHAEL L. 376-7746 1505 MARION, APT A PINE CUSTODIAN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 6 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BRADFORD, ANNE E. CITY ZIP 221-0913 1502 GREEN MOUNTAIN D#l27 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ROSE CITY JR ENGLISH 8, ENGLISH I BRADFORD, PATRICIA R. 753-5286 4205 DUNKELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PARK HILL SECOND YEAR BRADLEY, MARIE 771-1302 529 MELANIE LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY JR BRADLEY, PAULAS. 327-5680 RT. 2, BOX 31-A FIRST YEAR BRADSHAW, DONNA G. 945-4738 614 MILLS CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NORTHEAST TEACHER AIDE-SPECIAL ED BRAGG, RUTH ANN 753-6020 5400 SUMMERTREE CT, SD#23 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PINE SELF CONTAINED MR BRANCH, BOBBY J. 835-3614 73 SPRING GROVE DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2116 ROSE CITY JR EARTH SCIENCE BFANCH, GLENN D. 73 SPRING GROVE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN RESOURCE MATH 10, occ MATE 11 BRANCH, SUSAN I. 4006 WOODDALED R. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72209 PIKE VIEW FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS BRANNON, WILLIAM 0. 771-1538 4201 REDDING LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CRESTWOOD CUSTODIAN BRANT, PAULETTE 753-9190 3525 LAKEVIEW RD NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NORTHEAST WORLD GEOGRAPHY, AM HISTORY, SPANISH BRAY, CHERYL PANDORA 945-9434 13 SANDLEFOOT COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM MEDIA CLERK *47/46 BREEDING, BRANT E. 835-6574 207 HILLWOOD SHERWOOD AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR MATH 8, PRE-ALG 8, 9, ALG I BREEDING, BRIAN K. 666-8507 6415 WEST 3RD, #1 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 RIDGEROAD VOCAL MUSIC BRENTS, HELEN A. 753-4261 5016 PARKER BUS DRIVER BREWER, BARBARA 945-5934 #5 KNIGHT DRIVE ROSE CITY JR FOOD SERVICE WORKER BREWER, JESSIE L. 945-9221 5225 SO. WOODLAND OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN 7 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BREWER, RONALD R. 771-4266 409 MELAINE LAKEWOODE LEM CUSTODIAN BRIGGS, MAE KATHERINE 372-7258 307 E. 7TH APT 2 GLENVIEW SPEECH THERAPIST BRIGHT, WANDA L. 753-1716 916 W 51ST SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I AIDE BRIGHTOP, JOY L. 794-1747 RT 1, BOX 780 OLE MAIN BIOLOGY BRITT, ELAINE 945-2297 R. BROOKS, DONNA S. 6312 1/2 E. 45TH BUS AIDE CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BENTON AR 72015 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 835-8646 16 SALLISAW CT INDIAN HILLS ORTHOPEDICALLY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 HANDICAPPED AIDE BROOKS, GWENDOLYNB . 835-0460 75 CREEKWOOD OLE MAIN DRAMA I,II, JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 TECH THEATRE I, II SPEECH COMM. BROUGHTON, JUDY A. 982-0328 1010 FIRST ST, APT. L-12 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LYNCH DRIVE SIXTH YEAR BROWN, BRENDA K. 945-5080 1100 \"F\" ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE WORKER BROWN, CANDY B. 945-1370 400 N. PALM, APT. 46 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BROWN, CHARLES L. 835-7873 11 LANCE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPERINTENDENT-BUSINESS SERVICES BROWN, CHRISTINE 771-0154 2206 COORS LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BROWN, ELLEN J. 771-1202 3505 DUNKELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL GIRLS P.E. BROWN, JEFFREY D. 562-4076 23 ROLLING LANE LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 LAKEWOODJ R BOYS' P.E./ATHLETICS BROWN, MARY JANE 834-3818 127 LAGRUE DR ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR-SECONDARY BROWN, PATRICIA M. 758-5860 590 SILVERWOOD TRAIL BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN BROWN, PAUL W. 835-2311 117 ALMOND COVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 EDUCATION NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN AM. HISTORY, ATHLETICS 8 - NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT BROWN, RONNIE D. 103 MAY AVE NORTHEAST OCC MATH BROWN, SHARI L. 562-4076 23 ROLLING LANE LAKEWOODJ R BROWN, WILLIAM WAREHOUSE BROWN, WILLIAM D. WAREHOUSE BROWNING, JOHN 375-6710 INDIAN HILLS BRUCE, SHIRLEY 126 JUSTIN GENERAL LABOR R. 518 WILLOW ST. CUSTODIAN J. 315 ALANBROOK NORTHEAST MEDIA CLERK BRUMMETT, NETTIE S. 758-4635 5805 WALNUT RIDGEROAD CIVICS/HISTORY BRYANT, J. RONALD 753-6028 4201 HAZELWOOD CENTRAL BAND DIRECTOR BRYANT, RUTH M. 676-3403 RT. 2, BOX 191-A CRESTWOOD SECOND/THIRD YEARS BUCK, LEE ANNETTE 835-8266 107 RED RIVER AMBOY MEDIA SPECIALIST BUCKNER, ZANE V. 835-9747 1705 WEWOKAD R INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE BULL, CHARLOTTE S. 835-6677 15 THRUSH RIVER CR. CENTRAL RESOURCE BUNCH, PAULA J. 771-1312 412 ROCK CITY INDIAN HILLS BURGESS, CATHY R. ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR 758-0472 1127 W. SCENIC DR. LAKEWOODE LEM THIRD/FOURTH YEAR BURKE, FAITH C. 753-8672 LAKEWOODJR BURL, GREGORY E. 4100 ROYAL OAK READING, ENGLISH SE ZIP SHERWOOD AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLAND AR 72046 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 758-4674 1505 W. 55TH OLE MAIN HEAD FOOTBALL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 COACH, RESOURCE MATH BURNS, VALDA JEAN 758-5803 1121 WATERSIDE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BELWOOD SECRETARY 9 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION BURRALL, SHARON 753-3485 ROSE CITY JR BURRIS, KATHY A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT s. 4916 PIKE AVENUE CHORAL MUSIC (.50) CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 753-7296 5901 JFK BLVD, APT. 4003 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD COACH, SCIENCE BURROW, SHIRLEY ANN 758-9136 5215 GLENMERE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL SECRETARY BURTON, BETTY JEAN 945-9446 919 'I' STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER BURTON, CORNELIUS L. 945-3675 905 'I' ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 WAREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR BUTLER, BRENDA SUE 568-5254 5400 SOUTHBORO DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 INDIAN HILLS MR/LD RESOURCE BUTLER, DEBRA L. 834-3863 127 SPRINGOAK DR SHERWOOD AR 72116 RIDGEROAD MATH SE, SCIENCE SE, RESOURCE BUTTS, CAROL A. 988-1595 RT. 4, BOX 279 LYNCH DRIVE FIRST/SECOND YEARS BYNUM, DEEDRA L. 945-7530 6216 EAST 47TH NORTH HEIGHTS MR/LD RESOURCE BYNUM, MABLE W. 945-7530 6216 E 47TH CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE BYRD, ROXIE LEE 945-7865 ASST. SUPT.-PERSONNEL ADMN. OFFICE CALDWELL, DEBRA 758-3549 419 GLYNN LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CUSTODIAN M. 600 WEST 35TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE WORKER CALDWELL, VALERIE D. 225-5434 12410 TIMBER BEND DR CENTRAL SPECIAL EDUCATION CALVER, GAYLE A. 227-4593 12824 MORRISON RD. CENTRAL SCIENCE CAMERON, ANITA K. 753-5466 134 SHERIDAN NORTHEAST CCE COORDINATOR CAMMACK, LOUISE W. 834-7858 P.O. BOX 4456 NORTHEAST AMERICAN HISTORY, CAMMACK, SUZY P. 834-7858 P.O. BOX 4456 BELWOOD KINDERGARTEN 10 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMERICAN GOVT/ECON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 - NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION CAMP, DREW C. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 663-4706 710 N. PALM CITY ADMN. OFFICE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINER CAMPBELL, MURIELENE 753-2618 3501 FLORA CAFE. OFFICE CLERK, FOOD SERVICES CAMPBELL, SANDRA K. 753-7705 3600 ROYAL OAK DR NORTHEAST NURSE CANON, LINDA D. 372-3652 1315 W. 10TH PARK HILL LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CARPENTER, BARBARA 758-9854 509 LIBBY LANE NORTH HEIGHTS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CARR, KENNETH N. 557-2342 P.O. BOX 9192 WAREHOUSE CUSTODIAL FOREMAN CARR, REBECCA R. 834-5402 6004 ELK RIVER ARGENTA SPEECH THERAPIST *39/33 D. ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72119 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CARROLL, JOAN 835-2829 NORTHEAST CARTER, KAREN M. 113 TAYLOR ROAD JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 HOME EC II, INT. REL/PARENTING, FOODS 375-3360 BLDG, #4, APT CARTER, PEARLIE 945-0030 BUS DRIVER M. P.O. BOX 3542 FOOD SERVICE 40 SHORTER PIKE VIEW WORKER CASEY, JACK A. 758-7746 CENTRAL 1013 W. 48TH, APT B BOY'S P.E., ATHLETICS CASEY, RITA K. 758-1761 5621 WESTVIEW BOONE PARK FIRST YEAR CASTEEL, HELEN M. 354-4033 301 SO. CHESTNUT OLE MAIN ALGEBRA I, MATH II CASTEEL, MELISSA K. 742-3603 289 MORROWC HURCH RD. NORTH HEIGHTS FIFTH YEAR CAUSEY, SUSAN J. 666-6375 1711 S. CLEVELAND ROSE CITY ELEM SPEECH THERAPIST CHADWICK, DANA G. 3801 LAKESHORE DR NORTHEAST COUNSELOR CHAMBERS, DEANE 835-3886 716 W KIEHL ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY 11 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MORRILTON AR 72110 SEARCY AR 72143 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CHAMBERS, ROBBI S. 758-9616 4207 LOCHRIDGE RD LYNCH DRIVE SECOND YEAR CHANCELLOR, LINDA J. CITY 227-5026 1801 RESERVOIR RD #309 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL CHANDLER, BEULAH #7 SILVER CITY COURTS BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CHANDLER, LOU ANN 753-5679 5901 JFK, #4225 CENTRAL GIRLS' P.E., ATHLETICS CHANDLER, RUTH L. 375-5654 1009 HIGH SEVENTH STREET SECOND YEAR CHAPMAN, DEBRA K. 753-8577 126 LEE ST AMBOY LUNCH PERIOD AIDE CHAPMAN, NORA L. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-9252 4416 PIKE AVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOOD ELEM FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER CHAPPELL, KAREN L. 224-8761 240L PEAR ORCHARD DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 CRESTWOOD GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE*42(.6) 36(.2) CHISM, HOBERT L. 374-4687 1705 MARION ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER CHRISTIAN, ROSE B. 758-9489 4101 ROYAL OAK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL MATH CHUN, CALVIN S. 753-7541 4505 HAZELWOODR D NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT CLARK, ANGELIA C. 758-2483 15 THERESA DRIVE NO. LITTLE ROCK, 72118 INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE WORKER CLARK, CHRISTY A. 224-1270 801 S RODNEY PARM APT 26G LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 CRESTWOOD FIRST/SECOND YEAR CLARK, DENISE W. 834-8941 8416 EASY STREET SHERWOOD AR 72116 ARGENTA SECOND YEAR CLARK, EDITH M. 753-3169 2605 W. 58TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER CLARK, SHERRYL. 758-8652 431 MCCAIN BLVD, NPV131D NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN CLARKE, PATRICIA A. 945-1613 20 KNIGHT DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY JR FOOD SERVICE WORKER 12 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CLEMANS, KATHRYN A. 835-5244 1813 OSCEOLA SEVENTH STREET THIRD/FOURTH YEARS CLEMONS, PEGGY J. 753-5206 #77 KINGS RIVER RD NORTHEAST GEOM, ALG I CLINTON, CARA L. 778-1812 1721 THOMAS RD. RIDGEROAD SPECIAL EDUCATION CLINTON, RUTH L. 753-0501 422 W 52ND RIDGEROAD MEDIA SPECIALIST COBLE, RUBY J 758-0066 5705 DIVISION ATHLETIC OFFICE SECRETARY COKER, SARAH K. 758-5212 5901 J.F.K. BLVD #204 NORTH HEIGHTS SIXTH YEAR COLEMAN, ROSIE A. 378-0503 1859 SOUTH PULASKI ROSE CITY ELEM MR/LD RESOURCE COLEMAN, YVONNE 945-6001 704 PARKDALE ROSE CITY JR CUSTODlAN COLLIE, JACKIE L. 988-2303 RT 2, BOX 250 K WAREHOUSE CARPENTER COLLIE, MICHAEL D. 835-3126 9109 SYLVAN HILLS HWY CITY WAREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR FOREMAN COLLIE, SUSAN R. 835-6448 2301 OZARK DR BOONE PARK CHAPTER I AIDE COLLIER, JONNIE ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BENTON, AR 72015 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 227-5795 2903 DORSET LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 OLE MAIN CCE COORDINATOR, SPECIAL ED RESOURCE COLLIER, TAMMY L. 835-5510 2505 OZARK AMBOY FIRST/SECOND YEARS COLLINS, MILDRED V. 375-2509 1004 1/2 E. 17TH PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE WORKER COLLINS, SANDRA K. 758-5564 1205 LAKESHORE PL ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY CONDRAY, GLYNNA 753-5370 6204 EASTRIDGE ROSE CITY JR BUSINESS, HISTORY 8 COOK, CYNTHIA LOU 835-03 71 3 MEADOWP ARK FOX GROVE FOURTH YEAR 13 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS CITY ZIP ASSIGNMENT COOK, TINA D. 851-2025 BOONE PARK 6 ROCKLEDGE PLACE MAUMELLE, AR 72118 SECOND/THIRD YEAR COOKSEY, EDITH F. 758-1208 APT. 13, EASTGATE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER COOKSEY, RUBY J. 945-7773 PROTHO FOOD R. MANOR APT. #24 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CAFE. OFFICE COOKSEY, TAMMIE 758-8134 SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUE PINE R. COOMES, PAT A. 227-8234 ARGENTA COOPER, SUSAN 753-4262 LAKEWOOD JR COPELAND, ELTON #22 EASTGATE FOOD SERVICE WORKER 259 VALLEY CLUB CR PRINCIPAL 3833 LOCHRIDGE RD MATH 8, ALGEBRA I H C 835-0069 RT 3, BOX 118BB WAREHOUSE GENERAL LABOR COPELAND, JAIRUS L. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2212 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 10 CARDINAL VALLEY DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST CORNWELL, DEBRA BOYS' P.E. I, II, ATHLETICS 851-3969 55 STONELEDGE DR NORTHEAST RESOURCE MATH, MAUMELLE, AR RESOURCE ENGLISH,DRILL TEAM 72118 CORROTHERS, DONNA M. 945-5018 5107 GLENVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 INDIAN HILLS SECOND YEAR COUSINS, ELIZABETH H. 664-1393 200 N. MONROE LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 BOONE PARK SECOND YEAR COWART, ANN MARIE 59 KINGS RIVER RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN AMERICAN HISTORY, WORLD PROBLEMS COX, MARY BETH 834-4824 NORTHEAST 1720 OKMULGEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLISH II, III, DRILL TEAM COY, EARLINE E. 945-4343 139 SAUNDERS DR. BUS DRIVER CRAWFORD, ESTHER C. 758-2090 5901 J.F.K., APT. 2322 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARY CRESSWELL, RAYMOND D. 776-0827 704 HEIGHTS ROAD WAREHOUSE ROOFER FOREMAN CREWS, VERNELLE 835-9636 GLENVIEW 1411 SILVER CREEK DR FIRST/SECOND YEARS 14 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 EDUCATION BENTON AR 72015 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 - NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP CRITES, DIANE 758-8738 5101 NORTH HILLS BLVD. PRINCIPAL 4105 W. 10TH ST. FOOD SERVICE WORKER PIKE VIEW CROSS, JOYCE D. 663-3816 BOONE PARK CROSS, LYNDA JEAN 982-8819 PIKE VIEW 110 PINEHURST COVE THIRD/FOURTH YEAR D. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 CROWNOVER, ALAN 945-2560 WAREHOUSE P.O. BOX 3172 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SUPERVISIOR OF PLANT SERVICES CRUMBY, JEAN A. CENTRAL CRYMES, MARILYN 835-3887 NORTHEAST CURRY, JERRY R. 21 SOMERSET DR GIRLS' CHOIR, FRENCH, H. 7009 FLINTROCK RD ENGLISH II R, ENGLISH 843-7811 27 SUMMIT WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE PLUMBER DACE, JUDY F. 327-1011 49 DACE PL. LAKEWOODJR CAREER ORIENTATION DAILEY, WILLIAM 372-3690 P.O. BOX 2004 BUS DRIVER DALE JOANN 758-0842 824 W. 51ST BOONE PARK SECOND YEAR DALTON, LEWIS 0. 374-7482 P. 0. BOX 1621 ADMN. OFFICE DRIVER-CLERK DANAHER, KEVIN H. 771-0335 901 E. 53RD PL RIDGEROAD ASST. PRINCIPAL DANIELS, CHERYL G. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 GEN. MUSIC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 III B, ENGLISH II B CABOT AR 72023 CONWAY, AR 72032 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 835-0695 102 SUGAR MAPLE SHERWOOD AR 72116 NORTHEAST TMR, ARTS, CRAFTS DANIELS, GREGORY N. 227-6018 910 GREEN MTN. DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR COMPUTER SERVICES DANIELS, PEGGY 753-8143 819 W 42ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN SECRETARY DANIELS, STEPHEN E. 835-0695 102 SUGAR MAPLE SHERWOOD, AR 72116 NORTHEAST HEALTH, ATHLETICS DARBY, RANDA E. 834-3318 P. 0. BOX 4267 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR COUNSELOR 15 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION DARLING, MARY B. 753-1246 CENTRAL DAVIDSON, JERRY 945-3376 NORTHEAST DAVIS, BETTIE L. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 4912 LOCHRIDGE RD. CITY MATH D. 118 BLENDEN DR. FOOD SERVICE WORKER 753-8592 508 WISTERIA DR. BOONE PARK FIRST YEAR J. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 DAVIS, BRENDA 661-0305 1801 LEWIS LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 CAFE. OFFICE DAVIS, DANNA 224-0549 CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE DAVIS, GARY LEE 834-8386 NORTHEAST DAVIS, GLORIA D. #5 DEL RAY READING 505 BURNTWOODC T. HEALTH, BB 372-4262 1001 EAST 11TH INDIAN HILLS CROSSING GUARD DAVIS, JUDY F. 758-0651 LAKEWOODE LEM DAVIS, LEON B. 5400 N. WALNUT SECOND/THIRD YEAR 753-8592 P.O. BOX 9033 CENTRAL SOCIAL STUDIES DAVIS, MONICA D. LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 835-2904 130 WHITEWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN PHYSICAL SCIENCE, BIOLOGY, DRUG COORDINATOR DAVIS, ONEADER 945-5235 2509 LANSBROOK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SUBSTITUTE BUS DRIVER DAVIS, ROBIN R. 945-0964 4017 JACKSONVILLE HWY BOONE PARK DAVIS, ROY L. 676-3883 NORTHEAST DAY, PATRICIA A. FIRST YEAR RT. 2, BOX 153A CUSTODIAN 753-0838 #84 EASTGATE TERRACE REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE WORKER DEAL, DIANNA J. 771-4565 4705 WEST STREET GLENVIEW THIRD/FOURTH YEAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 DELK, CECILY A. 758-3390 3729 LOCHLANE NORTH LITTLE ROCK 72116 OLE MAIN SPEECH II,III,IV,DEBATE I,II,COMM.,STUDY HALL DELONEY, HAZEL B. 945-9561 2104 HUNTER RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOODJR CIVICS 16 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT DENNIS, JAMESETTA 455-3015 2206 FAIR PARK BOONE PARK COMPUTER LAB AIDE DENT, BETTY ANN 851-2620 LAKEWOODJ R DERDEN, ROBERT 20 PINE FOREST DRIVE EXP. BUSINESS 9 835-5821 RIDGEROAD c. 12 SALLISAW DR BAND DIRECTOR DERRICK, ANITA E. 753-2261 209 W. MILITARY DR INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN/FIRST DERRICK, BETTY L. 375-1777 1234 W. 8TH ST BARING CROSS FOOD SERVICE WORKER DETTOR, OLIVETTE C. 224-7148 19 WAGON WHEEL CT CENTRAL READING SE DICKERSON, TINA R. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 372-3754 800 BEECH, BLD SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE DIFFY, DEBRA K. 4, APT #34 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 WORKER 758-3449 5206 PIKE AVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PINE SECOND YEAR DILLARD, LOUIS S. 945-7814 1412 JAMES ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER DILLARD, SHERMON 758-5901 3900 MCCAIN PK,BLD#8, 242 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSE WORKER, FOOD SERVICES DILLINGER, RELLIA A. 225-6147 13121 MORRISON RD. LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR - SPECIAL EDUCATION DILLON, DARLENE 753-5212 201 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 INDIAN HILLS CHAPTER I AIDE DINGLER, DIANE J. 753-7014 5109 STRATFORD RD NORTH HEIGHTS SIXTH YEAR DIPIETRO, LOUISE M. 758-3884 5815 GREENHURST LAKEWOODE LEM FIRST YEAR DIRDEN, ROSE LEE 224-5728 216 BARTON SEVENTH STREET MR/LD RESOURCE DISON, MANUEL JR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 1521 EAST 2ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE DISON, MANUEL SR. 945-3220 2301 E. 2ND ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PARK HILL CROSSING GUARD 17 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT DISON, PEGGY J. 945-3220 2301 E. 2ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE WORKER DIXON, ANNIE P. 945-5234 #14 ESTELL LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER DIXON, GENEVA M. 945-4046 3422 EUREKA GARDEN ROSE CITY ELEM CHAPTER I AIDE 47 DOCKERY, DENNISE 945-0008 RT. 2, BOX 37 ROSE CITY JR FOOD SERVICE WORKER DOERR, PHYLLIS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ENGLAND AR 72046 5503 PARKER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DOKES, JO ANN 945-0978 215 S. LAUREL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE DOKES, VICKIE L. 835-2954 1111 BRICE AVE - D NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 REDWOOD SECRETARY DONAHUE, ANITA 753-4943 RT. 11, BOX 299AA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER DONCER, REBECCA J. 758-9619 512 HIGH HILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEARS DOREY, WILLIAM L. 834-1586 32 KOKO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 WAREHOUSE LEAD HEATING \u0026amp; AC DOSS, LISA B. 834-1082 NORTHEAST DOUGLASS, MAURI RT. 2, BOX 443B JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 BAND ASSISTANT, STUDY HALL T. 834-2043 BOONE PARK DOWNING, EULIN 1721 OKMULGEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE*33(.4) 43(.4) 49(.2) C. 982-2266 OLE MAIN DOYLE, TERRY LYN RT 1, BOX 103 AUTO SHOP I,II 834-4650 4801 N. HILLS BLVD,APT6B DREHER, BILLIE ANN 835-6007 1718 WEWOKA LAKEWOODJ R ART 8/9 DRINKWATER, LEANN 753-5679 5901 JFK #4225 ROSE CITY ELEM KINDERGARTEN DUDLEY, BARBARA L. 835-6757 100 OVERCUP RIDGEROAD MATH 8, P. ALGEBRA 8 18 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION DUGAS, MARTHA 835-0126 PARK HILL DUKE, STEPHEN 470-0720 L. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 9004 PATRICIA LYNN MR/LD RESOURCE RT. 6, BOX 347 CITY LANE SHERWOODA R CONWAY AR RIDGEROAD AM HIST *24/20, GEOGRAPHY DULANEY, ALMA L. 663-3630 4704 GRAND AVE LITTLE ROCK AR SEVENTH STREET FIFTH YEAR DUNCAN, KEVIN 771-0440 2400 MCCAIN BLVD, #1027 NO LITTLE ROCK PINE FOURTH YEAR DUNCAN, WILLIE A. 758-6701 1415 w. 20TH, APT. #1 NO LITTLE ROCK CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE WORKER DUNN, SHERRY M. 758-2693 6404 ALLWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK PARK HILL MEDIA SPECIALIST*43/39 DUNN, SHERYL A. ZIP 72116 72032 72204 AR 72116 AR 72114 AR 72118 304 LONGFIELD SHERWOODA R 72116 OLE MAIN AM GOV/tCONOMICS/AM. HIST., WORLD PROBLEMS DUPRIEST, JOHNNIE A. 834-7901 1304 W. KIEHL SHERWOODA R 72116 SECRETARY DURAN, KATHY L. 224-7149 1400 OLD FORGE DR. #502 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ROSE CITY JR PHYSICAL SCIENCE, GT FACILITATOR DUVALL, BILLY C. 758-8621 145 AUBURN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN DYER, JIM 835-4833 2212 CEDAR CREEK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODJR PRINCIPAL EARNHART, BETTY N. 753-1838 901 W 50TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ARGENTA CHAPTER I AIDE EAST, MARY CAROLYN 224-1589 89 KINGSPARK ROAD LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 SEVENTH STREET GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE*35(.6) 39(.2) 37(.2) EDGE, DORAL. 753-1378 RIDGEROAD 5700 S612 SUMMERTREE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ENGLISH/EIGHTH \u0026amp; NINTH READING EDMONDS, JUNE M. 227-0830 2914 CHARTER OAK LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 PIKE VIEW THIRD YEAR EDMONDS, WILLARD J. 982-1959 428 NO. OAK JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 LAKEWOODJR CUSTODIAN EDOGUN, PATRICIA S. P.O. BOX 5964 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72119 REDWOOD CROSSING GUARD 19 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT EDRINGTON, JODY L. 227-8411 CRESTWOOD EDWARDS, OZMA M. 320B NEBLING RD KINDERGARTEN 834-8738 3614 CATO RD. LAKEWOODE LEM FOOD SERVICE EGGENSPERGER. TAMI G. 835-4377 107 WHITEWOOD AMBOY KINDERGARTEN EGNER, PAMELA G. WORKER CENTRAL ROUTE 10, BOX 646 ENGLISH SE ELDRED, SHARON L. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 PINE BLUFF AR 71602 221-1641 4710 SAM PECK RD APT 1116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 BOONE PARK MR/LD RESOURCE ELLIOTT, LINDA KAY 835-6925 704 GROSVENOR SHERWOOD, AR 72116 MEADOW PARK FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS EMMERLING, LINDA L. 470-0533 P.O. BOX 466 MAYFLOWERA R 72106 PINE FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER ERVIN, MARGARET A. 753-6302 17 FOX DEN CT. SEVENTH STREET KINDERGARTEN ESTES, CANDACE K. 663-5458 6923 HAWTHORNE PIKE VIEW THIRD YEAR EVANS MARY B 224-1042 LYNCH DRIVE EVANS, COURTNAY 851-4353 PINE 8516 LA BETTE FIFTH/SIXTH A. 200 MILLWOOD, FIFTH YEAR EVANS, DEBORAH R. 834-4242 2002 EAST LEE DR YEARS APT. 424 SEVENTH STREET FIFTH \u0026amp; SIXTH YEAR EVANS, MICHELLE W. 758-8150 5121 GREENWAY AMBOY FIRST YEAR EWART, KAY T. 753-0846 NORTHEAST 37 OAK TREE CIRCLE GEOMETRY R,B FALLIS, CHERYLL. 758-4162 501 LINDENHURST OLE MAIN ALGEBRA II, CALCULUS FARZLEY, FRANCES F. 758-7011 4516 AUSTIN DRIVE RIDGEROAD ENGLISH 8 FAULK, MARTHA J. 771-0494 4008 MT VERNON LAKEWOODJR B.A. AIDE 20 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION FENDLEY, SUSAN 753-6581 LAKEWOOD JR FEWELL, MARTHA 771-1275 CENTRAL ADDREss ASSIGNMENT c. 4509 CRESTLINE DRIVE GIFTED - ENGLISH 8 J. 1913 MILL CREEK NURSE CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 FLAKE, R. LARRY 753-3058 NORTHEAST 4909 SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BIOLOGY, SCIENCE/MANKIND FLEMING, ALICE A. 758-1912 2209 MIDDLETON LAKEWOODJ R AMERICAN HISTORY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 8, ENGLISH 8 FLORES, HESTER M. 758-4033 2216 LANSBROOK DR, #57 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 FOOTS, THELMA 945-5148 REDWOOD FORD, LOIS L. 753-4873 AMBOY BUS DRIVER 801 'E' ST, DIXIE ADD CUSTODIAN 705 SHAMROCK CROSSING GUARD FORD, MARTHA J. 835-5591 26 CORONADO PRINCIPAL SMITH AMBOY FORD, MIRIAM 375-0544 MEADOW PARK FORTNER, SUE 753-8926 RIDGEROAD 2400 GAINES FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS FOSSUM, KIM K. 225-7191 REDWOOD 6612 GREENBANK 13500 ROCK CREEK, SIXTH YEAR FOWLER, MATTHEW 0. RT. 9, BOX 556 WAREHOUSE ROOFER FOWLKES, ELIZABETH A. 758-0703 4001 ORANGE ST ROSE CITY ELEM FIRST YEAR FRANKLIN, ROOSEVELT D. 945-5361 1003 G. ST INDIAN HILLS CUSTODIAN FRANKS, MARGUERITE 753-0415 2901 DONAGHEY NORTHEAST SECRETARY FRAZIER, BRENDA J. 945-0791 #10 GOODWIN CIRCLE 610A MEADOW PARK FOOD SERVICE WORKER FRELIGH, TAMMY L. 835-4318 120A W. WOODRUFF GLENVIEW QUEST/TEACHER 21 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 BENTON AR 72015 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION FROST, PATRICIA 945-3686 REDWOOD FULLER, LINDA S. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT A. 6616 FARMSTEAD RD. FOOD SERVICE WORKER 753-4639 4004 GLENMERE OLE MAIN GUIDANCE COUNSELOR FULTON, ELIZABETH H. 663-9380 6600 HAWTHORNE NORTHEAST BIOLOGY, PHY/ECOL FURLOUGH, LORETTA J. 455-6251 9920 GODWIN DR BOONE PARK SIXTH YEAR FUSELIER, ANITA K. 835-8722 110 MARKHAVEN LAKEWOOD ELEM SECOND YEAR GAMBLE, NORA JEAN 376-2847 3123 ARCH REDWOOD FOURTH/FIFTH YEAR GARDNER, CHARLENE CITY #21 EASTGATE TERRACE APT PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE WORKER GARRETT, CAROLYN FAE 329-2329 1301 COLLIER DR LYNCH DRIVE RESOURCE GARRETT, GERALDINE 375-3959 1801 VANCE RIDGEROAD HOME ECONOMICS I, II GARRETT, RACHELL. 376-1390 1406 W. 9TH BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE GARRETT, RACHELL. 376-1390 1406 W. 9TH BOONE PARK CROSSING GUARD GARRETT, SARAH M. 470-0982 RT. 1, BOX 91M BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE GARRISON, JANET 221-1874 4 REGAL CT ROSE CITY JR BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT GARRISON, STEVEN D. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72207 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 SHERWOOD AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CONWAY AR 72032 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MAYFLOWERA R 72106 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 758-8028 605 WESTFIELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY JR IND. ARTS 8-9, CAREER ORIENTATION GARVIN, WILLIAM E. 982-2661 P.O. BOX 1135 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 OLE MAIN ENGLISH IV, STUDENT COUNCIL GARY, RAYMOND 945-2850 2506 E. 2ND MECHANIC HELPER GATES, CARROLL L. 372-4340 1316 W. 11TH PINE CUSTODIAN 22 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION GATES, JUDIE A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT fl NEAL PLACE NORTHEAST SECRETARY GATES, JUDY F. 835-1682 7618 TOMAHAWKD R INDIAN HILLS FIRST YEAR GATEWOOD, ADA LEE 376-8863 2501 BATTERY REDWOOD SECOND YEAR GEORGE, GAIL SUZANNE CITY 455-4964 13600 OTTER CR PKWY #234 BOONE PARK SPEECH THERAPIST GIBBS, BETTY A. 945-5844 MEADOWP ARK GILBERT, RHONDA 758-8301 PINE GILKEY, BARBARA 562-4162 ADMN. OFFICE GILLISON, SARA 666-8540 NORTH HEIGHTS GIMBLET, ELAINE 753-0840 RIDGEROAD 22 ESTELL LANE CHAPTER I AIDE F. 1708 N OLIVE CHAPTER I AIDE J. P.O. BOX 164316 HIPPY/PAC COORDINATOR F. 2501 RIVERFRONT F201 FIRST YEAR M. 4800 N CYPRESS CIVICS 9 GIRKIN, CARLA M. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 663-7285 6 POINT O' WOODS LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LAKEWOODJ R PHYSICAL SCIENCE/EARTH SCIENCE GLADWIN, MARLA JO 771-0315 224 DOOLEY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR *44(.90) 46(.10) GLASS, THELMA J. 771-0359 5618 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER GLOVER, DEBRA C. 758-7991 13 BLACKSTONE CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 AMBOY GLOVER, JAMES c. 1700 WESTPARK #230 LITTLE ROCK ARK 72204 CENTRAL GLOVER, WELDON 327-1527 REDWOOD GLOVER, WILLIAM BAND DIRECTOR, GEN. MUSIC 1118 DONAGHEY CUSTODIAN R. 5318 WOOD ST WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER GLOVER, WILLIAM R. WAREHOUSE 23 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION GOLDSBY, OPAL J. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 753-3261 412 W 21ST ARGENTA THIRD YEAR GORE, KIM 835-0311 8301 MERRIWOOD CT AMBOY FIRST YEAR GOSS, FRANCENE S. 753-4173 3101 OLIVE CENTRAL GOSS, GARY F. ENGLISH, ART 753-4173 3101 OLIVE CITY ATHLETIC OFFICE DIRECTOR OF ATHLETICS GOVAN, MATTIE O. 945-7185 5011 N. WOODLANDD R. GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE WORKER GRANDERSON, JANET L. 108 CEDARWOOD LAKEWOODJ R GRANDY, BRENDA K. BAND DIRECTOR AMBOY #84 SHORTtR GARDENS APTS FOOD SERVICE WORKER s. 121 INDIAN TRAIL ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 GRAVETTE, RICK 225-5941 NORTHEAST GRAY, CYNTHIA ART I, II, III, FINE ARTS, STUDY HALL I. LAKEWOODJR GRAY, JIMMIED. 1319 WRIGHT AVE, APT 214 CUSTODIAN 835-1364 1200 DYSON DR. NORTHEAST PSYCHOLOGY, ENGLISH GRAYSTON, LARHONDA J. 329-7357 RT. 3, BOX 766 CENTRAL COUNSELOR GREEN, JO ANN 771-0581 6513 ROLLING HILLS DR ADMN. OFFICE ASSISTANT BOOKKEEPER GREEN, KAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 SHERWOOD AR 72116 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 835-0210 7300 COMANCHE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS CHAPTER I AIDE GREEN, LUTHER 945-0402 1509 BEN STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 INDIAN HILLS CUSTODIAN GREEN, NANCY C. 753-8435 5716 N. CEDAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 REDWOOD SPEECH THERAPIST *49/42 GREENWAY, PATRINA #54 SOUTHLAND CT. MAUMELLE AR 72118 NORTHEAST FRENCH, AMERICAN HISTORY GRIFFITH, STEPHANIE 834-1750 112 ROBINGLEN SHERWOOD AR 72116 REDWOOD KINDERGARTEN 24 -- NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT GRISSOM, KIMBERLY D. 758-2779 5901 JFK APT 4002 PARK HILL FIRST YEAR GUNDAKER, LINDA A. 843-9143 RT. 1, BOX 102A REDWOOD THIRD/FOURTH YEAR GUNNELS, CAROLYN J. 835-2805 6318 IROQUIS DR. INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HALL, CHERYLL. 225-4782 INDIAN HILLS HALL, DONNA K. 7901 HARMON DR SPEECH THERAPIST CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AUSTIN, AR 72007 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 834-0328 LAKEWOODJR HALL, RICHARD D. 124 ALMONDC OVE SHERWOODA R 72116 ENGLISH 8, COMMUNICATIONS9 ,AT RISK YOUTHC OORD 834-0328 124 ALMOND COVE SHERWOOD, AR 72116 NORTHEAST CHORAL MUSIC DIRECTOR HAMILTON, ANNIE W. 372-2769 823 PINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 OLE MAIN BUS. LAW, RECORD KEEPING, KEY BOARDING HAMILTON, SHANNON E. 225-0466 911 N SHACKLEFORD RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LAKEWOODJR GUIDANCE COUNSELOR HAMLIN, SHERI L. 834-4469 111 MAYFAIR COVE SHERWOODA R 72116 MEADOWP ARK SECOND YEAR HAMMETT, DIANE E. 758-1854 119 EAST A STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 REDWOOD FIFTH YEAR HAMPTON, CYNTHIA 664-2832 1305 SOUTH CLEVELAND LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NORTHEAST BUSINESS LAW, JET, ENTREPRENEURSHIP HAMPTON, JACQUELINE A. 376-2253 3123 GAINES STREET LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 GLENVIEW MEDIA SPECIALIST*46/47 HAMPTON, NORA LEE 375-7523 1714 S BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 CENTRAL COUNSELOR HARDCASTLE, MARGARET L. 758-2718 209 LATONA LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS HARDER, MARILYN J. 758-5987 3705 W. MCCAIN PARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CRESTWOOD FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER HARDIN, JUDY A. 945-1867 2300 EAST SECOND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HARDISON, DEBORAH J. 834-0813 33 CORONADO NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL SE READING,SCIENCE,MATH,ENGLISH,GEOGRAPHY 25 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION R. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP HARDY, REGINA 834-3915 MEADOWP ARK HARPER, BENNY R. 6705 PONTIAC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR*40(.80) 30(.10) 47(.10) 753-3957 6205 N ALLEN OLE MAIN ASST PRINCIPAL HARPER, CATHERINE 834-0789 19 THRUSH RIVER NORTH HEIGHTS SECRETARY HARRELL, CHARLES W., JR 835-2086 RT 3, BOX 60 ROSE CITY ELEM CUSTODIAN HARRINGTON, DOROTHY J. 663-5992 2107 S. TAYLOR BOONE PARK FIFTH YEAR HARRIS, ALICIA K. 663-7969 7501 ILLINOIS PINE FIRST/SECOND HARRIS, CHARLES JR. 835-4801 300 BEVERLY WAREHOUSE WAREHOUSE MAN HARRIS, CHARLES S. JR. WAREHOUSE HARRIS, KATHY L. 945-4062 709 BLOSSOM YEAR ROSE CITY ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HARRIS, LILTON C. 376-4631 720 N. PINE ST BUS DRIVER HARRIS, NINA C. 753-2923 4536 SOMERS AVE ADMN. OFFICE HOMEBOUNDT EACHER HARRIS, PATRICIA W. 664-4593 5121 W. 23RD CENTRAL ENGLISH HARRIS, TITUS 707 CEDAR ST. SEVENTH STREET CROSSING GUARD HARRISON, BRENDA F. 753-2646 P.O. BOX 3182 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE WORKER HARRISON, JOHN L. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2207 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 771-2835 615 W. 33RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 OLE MAIN OCCAM HIST, OCC MATH, RESOURCE AM HIST HART, LUELLEN S. 888-7333 21 CONNIEWOOD LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 OLE MAIN CHEMISTRY, SCI \u0026amp; MANKIND HARTL, ELSA MARIE 262-2566 RT. 2 BOX 333 HOT SPRINGS AR 71901 PIKE VIEW MEDIA SPECIALIST 26 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT HARTWICK, BARBARA J, 771-0451 1611 GROVE HILL BELWOOD THIRD YEAR HARVELL, LINDA M. 771-0953 3801 FOX HILL PIKE VIEW FIFTH YEAR CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 HARVEY, EVA M. 375-1921 LYNCH DRIVE HATLEY, SANDRA 1120 E. 2ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER M. 758-8491 ROSE CITY JR HAVER, GARY L. 5300 SUMMERTREE, APT SC22 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 COACH, HEALTH, GIRLS P.E. 753-4187 19 OAK TREE CR OLE MAIN DE COORDINATOR HAVLIN, PATRICIA K. 329-5875 32 CHERYL DR CENTRAL MATH, PRE-ALGEBRA HAWKINS, RUSSELL D. 374-1869 2000 SCHILLER SKILLS CENTER PRINCIPAL HAWKINS, WILLENE 372-5680 1704 WEST LONG 17TH BOONE PARK CUSTODIAN HAYDEN, MARY G. 758-1622 109 DELMAR MEADOWP ARK SECOND/THIRD YEARS HAYNIE, VICKIE L. 771-2129 RT. 6, BOX 169D CRESTWOOD CHAPTER I AIDE HAYS, MARK A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CONWAYA R 72032 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 568-4499 4301 VINSON RD. LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 RIDGEROAD P.E. HAZELWOOD, LINDA I. 753-3158 5901 JFK BLVD. #102 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD PE, GIRLS COACH, CHEERLEADERS HAZELWOOD, PATTY G. 753-3158 5901 JFK BLVD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR (*35 ,90/33 .10) HEATHCOCK, REBECCA SUE 851-2154 7 YUKON COVE MAUMELLE AR 72118 LAKEWOODE LEM SPEECH THERAPIST (,50) RESOURCE (,50) HENDERSON-PRICE, PATRICIA 753-7073 319 W. 21ST N. LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 PINE CHAPTER I AIDE HENDERSON, DONNA MARIE 758-2583 431 MCCAIN, HIGHCLIFF C32 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD P.E., PEP CLUB HENDERSON, SUSAN M. 945-7567 801 GREENLEA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 AMBOY FOOD SERVICE WORKER 27 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION HENRY, JIM D. 753-7604 HENSLEY, PAMELA 327-0299 ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 5313 N. LOCUST BUS DRIVER J. 36 FRANCES DR ROSE CITY JR ART HENSON, GUYANA 758-2309 LAKEWOOD ELEM HENSON, SANDRA K. L. 5600 ALTA VISTA CHAPTER I AIDE 851-2060 5 TREVINO DR. CITY CENTRAL ENGLISH-GIT FACILITATOR HIBBARD, JANICE SUE 753-1080 1925 TOPF RD BOONE PARK SIXTH YEAR HIBBLEN, DORIS S. 835-5976 2609 OZARK DR ROSE CITY JR CIVICS (5/7) HICKMAN, CHRISTINE 945-2709 5013 N WOODLAND GLENVIEW CHAPTER I AIDE ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK 72118 MAUMELLE, AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 HICKS, MARYE. 753-3946 NORTHEAST HIGDON, TAMMY D. 1613 CIRCLEDALE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 G/T FACILITATOR, ENGLISH II H 225-2992 13500 ROCK CREEK ARGENTA SECOND YEAR HILL, DORISENE W. 664-2647 2401 S. MONROE LYNCH DRIVE HILLIAN, CARLA 882-3753 ARGENTA HODGE, LORETTA PRINCIPAL s. RT. 2, BOX 31 FIRST YEAR PARKWAY 374-7915 2004 EAST 2ND STREET REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE WORKER HODGES, MARILYN 518 CHERRY HILL CLERK, FOOD SERVICES LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 BEEBE AR 72012 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 3800 MELLENE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER CAFE. OFFICE HOGAN, BETTY 758-9772 NORTHEAST HOGAN, KATHLEEN 666-0678 301 KINGSROW #310 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 AMBOY KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEARS HOGGARD, SARA J. 565-4462 8701 I-30 APT. 244 OLE MAIN MATH II, GEOMETRY HOHN, WILMA A. 835-5717 OLE MAIN 2111 SEMINOLE CLERK 28 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT HOKE, CHARLOTTE R. 758-4131 510 WEST \"M\" ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MEADOW PARK MR/LO RESOURCE HOLLAND, ANITA z. 835-7591 27 SINGLE OAK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY ELEM KINDERGARTEN HOLLEY, MARSHA D. 201 1/2 PARKVIEW NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 GLENVIEW KINDERGARTEN HOLLISTER, MARTHA 372-5268 250 MELROSE CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HOLLOWAY, JIMMY R. 835-0245 24 ALOHA CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COMPUTER PROGRAMMER-OPERATOR HOLLOWAY, MARION 753-6006 1420 w. 36TH ST SECRETARY v. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOOD ELEM HOLMES, DARLENE 758-4463 REDWOOD 1017 NICOLE CHAPTER I DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 COMPUTER LAB AIDE HOLT, BRENDA S. 679-3034 BOX 61 SKILLS CENTER SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE HOLT, FRANKIE Y. 834-0197 #5 CUSTER PLACE SEVENTH STREET MEDIA SPECIALIST HOMAN, ROSETTA M. 835-4256 8904 WILHITE LANE ARGENTA KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR HOPKINS, MYRNA GAIL 758-0526 4107 LOCKRIDGE NORTHEAST JOURNALISM, ENGLISH II HORNE, JAMES 945-5879 203 TIE PLANT LN ROSE CITY ELEM CROSSING GUARD HORTON, DEBORAH J. 835-1439 23 WINDSTONE DRIVE LAKEWOODE LEM ELEMENTARYC OUNSELOR HORTON, SHELIA F. 375-3644 607 CORNING NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER HOST, SHEILA D. 851-2610 118-A FIRESTONE CAFE. OFFICE CLERK, FOOD SERVICES HOUSER, RICHARD WAREHOUSE HOUSER, RICHARD C. 945-5748 31 NEAL PL WAREHOUSE ROOFER 29 GUY AR 72061 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT HOUSTON, LINDA L. 851-3257 HEMLOCK CTS . , 133 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER HOWARD, HARVEY B. 835-7183 1205 KOEHLER SHERWOOD AR 72116 CENTRAL BOYS P.E., ATHLETICS HOWARD, LENORA SUE 835-7183 1205 KOEHLER SHERWOOD AR 72116 REDWOOD SECOND/THIRD YEARS HOWELL, NANNETTE LEE 470-0339 RT 2, BOX 1510 MAYFLOWER AR 72106 RIDGEROAD READING 8-9/ENGLISH HOYER, JEAN E. 758-3704 5201 FAIRWAY #7 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PARK HILL COUNSELOR*37(.50) 43 (. 50) HUDDLESTON, JEFFREY R. 758-6281 2410 NORTH BERKLEY LAKEWOOD JR ENGLISH I, ART HUDSON, BETTY 753-4865 #32 GREYCOURT CR ARGENTA SECRETARY HUDSON, NELL C. 835-1949 7208 PONTIAC DR ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY HUDSON, TOMMY W. 778-9316 RT 8, BOX 204 OLE MAIN MACH TOOL TECH. I, II, HUGHES, LOUISE E. 753-5135 115 W. 19TH ST. RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE WORKER HULST, JANEANNE C. 371-0265 1218 PARKER LAKEWOOD ELEM KINDERGARTEN HUNTER, CAROL F. 771-0882 5901 JFK BLVD, #1621 GLENVIEW KINDERGARTEN HUNTER, CAROLYN 945-3920 724 GRAHAM ST. LYNCH DRIVE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE HUNTER, CHRISTIE A. 753-8656 349 GOSHEN AMBOY SPEECH THERAPIST HUTCHINSON, CONNIE T. 835-5483 307 N DEVON NORTH HEIGHTS CHAPTER I AIDE HUTSON, RENEE D. 225-3495 315 SHADOW RIDGE DR REDWOOD KINDERGARTEN HYDE, BETTYE L. 455-3166 13300 MEYER ROAD MEADOWP ARK CHAPTER I AIDE 30 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BENTON AR 72015 EXPLOR. MACH TOOL TECH. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 MABELVALE AR 72103 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION INGALLS, ASHLEY 753-3993 AMBOY ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT A. 25 SUGAR CREEK BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT INGRAM, ELAINE K. 227-5754 19 WOOD HILL DR. CITY MEADOW PARK SPEECH THERAPIST *40/37 ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 INGRAM, RONALD 666-1076 NORTHEAST 6511 STERLING DR BASKETBALL COACH, NELL LITTLE ROCK AR WORLD PROBLEMS 72204 IRVING, WANDA 945-1655 RIDGEROAD 308 CHERYL FOOD SERVICE HEAD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 WORKER ISAAC, MARTHA A. 834-1126 302 SHADOW OAKS BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN JACKSON, ALINE G. 753-4577 120 W. 52 ND STREET NORTH HEIGHTS SECOND YEAR JACKSON, BETH L. 834-0008 507 A, OAKDALE ROAD BOONE PARK MR/LO RESOURCE JACKSON, CLAUDIA 758-7156 2106 FENDLEY DR BELWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JACKSON, CLEMENT LEE 372-4832 916 CONCORD SUBSTITUTE-BUS DRIVER JACKSON, FRANCICAL 945-2240 2108 WHYTE DR NORTH HEIGHTS PRINCIPAL JACKSON, JANE B. 753-4307 36 DESOTO CIRCLE RIDGEROAD EARTH SCIENCE JACKSON, KATHRYN L. 758-0453 4408 ARLINGTON INDIAN HILLS FOURTH/FIFTH YEAR JACKSON, LORETTA P. 945-0042 4813 ATKINS GLENVIEW FOOD SERVICE JACKSON, SHAWANA K. 900 W. 23RD ROSE CITY JR JACKSON, SUSIE B. CUSTODIAN 664-1729 6407 SHERRY DR WORKER BELWOOD ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL JACKSON, TINA C. 982-3522 601 LEHMAN PIKE VIEW DEAF EDUCATION JACOBS, DOROTHY J. 375-8838 BLDG.#14, APT192,SHORTER NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER 31 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT JENKINS, LYNDA G. CITY 945-9204 RT. 4, BOX 115 JAMISON BUS DRIVER JERROD, ERMA 706 WALNUT MEADOWP ARK FOURTH YEAR JOHNSON, BEVERLY A. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 375-3315 800 BEECH, BLD#8, APT120 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD FOOD SERVICE WORKER JOHNSON, BUFORD L. 753-4682 1605 W. SCENIC, APT. G-11 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSE WORKER-FOOD SERVICE JOHNSON, FRED L. 679-3971 ROUTE 1, BOX 318 GREENBRIER AR 72058 OLE MAIN TRIG., ADV. MATH, INT. ALG. JOHNSON, IDELIA 945-1842 CRESTWOOD JOHNSON, JANNIE 945-4219 204 S. PALM FOOD SERVICE WORKER v. 2112 HUNTER RD. NORTH HEIGHTS JOHNSON, JOYCE M. FOOD SERVICE WORKER 375-2244 1305 VINE STREET INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE WORKER JOHNSON, KARLA A. 223-9164 7604 OHIO #5 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR JOHNSON, MARTHA 945-5268 618 MILLS ST. SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JOHNSON, MARY LOUISE 374-4723 1027 E. 11TH ST. LAKEWOODE LEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE JOHNSON, MILDRED J. 945-7229 4408 WAYNE ST NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER JOHNSON, NADINE 945-9629 GLENVIEW JOHNSON, OZETTA 758-6872 LAKEWOODJ R JOHNSON, ROBERT 945-9629 GLENVIEW JOHNSON, TERI L. 5113 N. WOODLAND LUNCH PERIOD AIDE #8 GREY CT. COVE ENGLISH 8, ENGLISH 9 L. 5113 N. WOODLAND LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 945-5268 409 PROTHO AMBOY FOOD SERVICE WORKER JOHNSTON, CARL 985-1290 CENTRAL B. 2915 DIXON RD, LOT 15 CUSTODIAN 32 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT JOHNSTON, CATHY L. 753-3855 4800 GREENWAY DR. PIKE VIEW KINDERGARTEN JOLLY, PATRICIA H. 835-1286 1707 WAR EAGLE NORTH HEIGHTS FIRST YEAR JONES, BARBARA D. 835-6786 805 AUTUMNBROOK ARGENTA THIRD YEAR JONES, CHARLES L. 758-2856 6217 NORTH ALLEN NORTHEAST ADMN. ASST. CIR JONES, ELLEN M. 835-2935 LAKEWOODJ R JONES, FAITH R. 758-2856 6713 PONDEROSA COMMUNICATIONS 8, 9 6217 N. ALLEN CITY ROSE CITY JR JONES, JEROME 961-1404 COMPUTER LAB MANAGER NORTH HEIGHTS JONES, KATHY D. 945-0559 BELWOOD RT. 1, BOX 245-1 CUSTODIAN 604 GORDON FOOD SERVICE WORKER JONES, MARGUERITE ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SCOTT AR 72142 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 753-8046 1704 HAZEL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ARGENTA FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER JONES, MARY T. 375-1345 2124 WOLFE LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 BOONE PARK FOURTH YEAR JONES, RICKEY E. 834-7204 126 KING PINE RD SHERWOOD AR 72116 LAKEWOODJ R EXP IND TECH ED 8, 9 JONES, SANDRA A. 753-6555 6009 BUCKLES DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL FIRST/SECOND YEAR JONES, SANDRA K. 753-2854 521 WISTERIA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY JR SECRETARY JONES, TAMMY L. 758-1799 2401 LAKEVIEW RD. T-8 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BOONE PARK KINDERGARTEN JORDAN, GENEVA 372-3633 1102 EAST 13TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BARING CROSS SELF CONTAINED MR JORDAN, KATHRYNE A. 945-5858 4604 E. PUCKETT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 AMBOY BA AIDE JORDAN, MARIE T. 834-3709 1633 SARATOGA DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PINE SELF-CONTAINED MR AIDE 33 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT JORGENSON, LIZBETH A. 758-5290 821 SILVER HILL RD. NORTH HEIGHTS SECOND YEAR JOSHUA, WILLIE E. JR. 771-4979 RT 6, BOX 228 BUS DRIVER JOYCE, SANDRA M. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 753-6206 5310 CHANDLER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN MEDIA CLERK JUCKETT, SANDRA K. 835-6965 1801 E. LEE SHERWOOD, AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-ASST. SUPT. FOR STUDENT AFFAIRS KAISER, PATRICIA A. 835-6701 #6 CUSTER PLACE SHERWOODA R 72116 ROSE CITY JR TMR, MR RESOURCE, LD KAUFMAN, DAVID L. 753-0784 4521 NORTH CYPRESS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST AMERICAN HISTORY B, WORLD PROBLEMS KEEL, SHARON E. 945-7350 29 NEAL PLACE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOODE LEM MEDIA CLERK 42/32 KELLAR, JOHNNY S. 335-7105 P.O. BOX 186 WOOSTER, AR 72181 BARING CROSS ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL KELLEY, DARLENE W. 945-5178 #12 GOODWIN CR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 AMBOY SECOND YEAR KELLEY, NANCY L. 771-4471 3808 LAKEWOODV ALLEY DR PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR KELLUM, LEO JR. 945-5538 307 CLOVER RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN KELLY, REECE D. 568-4515 8701 I-30, APT 197 BUS DRIVER KELLY, SHIRLEY K. 982-2089 24 PRESTON CT PARK HILL FOURTH YEAR KELSO, BEVERLY A. 4120 ROYAL OAK DRIVE LAKEWOODE LEM FIFTH/SIXTH YEAR KENNEDY, DINAH L. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2209 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 753-2548 6304 ALLWOOD NORTHEAST CONSUMER MATH, NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ALGEBRA II, TRIGONOMETRY KENNEDY, ROGER LEE 376-9724 1717 W. 16TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LAKEWOODJR CUSTODIAN KEOUGH, KATHERINE N. 753-0542 3131 RIDGEROAD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BELWOOD FIFTH YEAR 34 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT KETCHER, RENETTA G. CITY ZIP 753-7882 36 HERITAGE PARK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD SECRETARY .50 KIEKLAK, RONALD J. 758-6092 4613 DAWSON DRIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST PSYCHOLOGY, AM HISTORY H KILLGORE, SHEILA K. 834-8002 9101 WOODBINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN BIOLOGY, COACH KIMBRELL, SHARRON J. 753-4911 5521 CRESCENT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 RIDGEROAD PRE-ALG., GEN. MATH, GEOMETRY KINCL, ANN B. 758-0888 3108 CLEBURNE PLACE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR-GIFTED/TALENTED \u0026amp; VIPS KINCL, CAROLYN L. 835-6001 917 COULTER SHERWOODA R 72116 OLE MAIN SECRETARY KIRBY, CYNTHIA D. 851-1584 15 LUPINE RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN BIOLOGY KIRBY, MARJORIE H. 753-7089 4007 HILLSIDE DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN CONS ED, FOODS/IND LIV, SAC KIRKWOOD, CATHY S. 945-7824 1124 HEALY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CENTRAL SECRETARY KIRSPEL, KENNETH A. 835-3369 5904 NORTH HILLS BLVD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR PRI IPAL KLINGEBIEL, VICKI LYN 569-6922 2211 MOSS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER KNIGHT, RENA 835-8553 NORTHEAST KOCKE, SHARON L 988-2241 512 RICKY RACCOON DR JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 AMERICAN HISTORY, WORLD HISTORY AMBOY KOENIG, JO ELLEN 122 KANSAS FOURTH YEAR JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 771-2087 3900 MCCAIN PARK DR #105 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BARING CROSS SELF-CONTAINED MR KOETTEL, PATTI A. 834-2475 11 PATTY LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET KINDERGARTEN KOONE, BARBARA 753-7413 723 WEST 'A' NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE THIRD/FOURTH YEARS KRAFT, ROSEMARY 835-2848 7 WAR EAGLE COURT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 35 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT KUBAIKO, BARBARA A. CITY ZIP 758-1971 120 E. 23RD STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER KULLANDER, KIM 223-8667 NORTHEAST 38 MORRISON CT. LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 ALGEBRA I, CALCULUS (.50) LAIR, SABRE L. 374-9526 520 W. 16TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ARGENTA CROSSING GUARD LAMAR, DIANNA G. 372-0531 800 BEECH, APT 122, BLD 9 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER LANES, QUILLA M. 945-1603 2618 E. SECOND ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 OLE MAIN COUNSELOR LANGFORD, SALLIE F. 834-8088 6905 FLINTROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST SPEECH, DEBATE LANGRELL, GWENNETH K. 835-5521 7824 POWELL SHERWOOD AR 72116 ARGENTA CHAPTER I AIDE LANKFORD, DENISE K. 945-1291 #14 NEAL PLACE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PIKE VIEW FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER LAREY, JILL A. 771-4069 6401 GREENBANK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CRESTWOOD MEDIA SPECIALIST *42/32 LARRY, EDWIN L. 945-3624 5208 SO. WOODLAND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 RIDGEROAD CUSTODIAN LARSON, PAT A. 835-0889 6517 CHIPPEWA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS LASTER, GREGORY 945-5789 RIDGEROAD LATTA, VIRGINIA 758-3182 INDIAN HILLS LATTING, CARL A. L. 2114 EDMONDS ST. CUSTODIAN R. 4417 ORANGE THIRD/FOURTH YEARS 888-3259 #15 LENORA LANE CENTRAL BOYS P.E./ATHLETICS LATTING, LOIS 888-3259 AMBOY LAUGHINGHOUSE, 834-3083 RIDGEROAD J. LAWHON, JILL M. 15 LENORA LANE FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS TERRY J. 8213 OAKRIDGE ace ENGLISH, RESOURCE 455-0016 12021 BLACK WALNUT CR AMBOY SECOND YEAR 36 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 SHERWOOD AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT LAWRENCE, GEORGIA L. 945-1072 #32 HEMLOCK CT. ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE WORKER LEA, MADGE L. 945-7960 4401 E. BROADWAY ROSE CITY ELEM CUSTODIAN LEE, DEBORAH A. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 1519 W. 15TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER LEE, GLORIA A. 375-9944 1922 W. SHORT 17TH CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER LEE, HELENE. 835-6229 PIKE VIEW LEE, PHILIP E. 1206 KOEHLER CHAPTER I AIDE 835-8110 811 KOEHLER RD CENTRAL SCIE~CE LEMOINE, BURTON A. 753-2058 5004 STRATFORD RD. LEWIS, FRANCIS 835-7287 CENTRAL LEWIS, LINDA S. 945-5464 MEADOWP ARK LEWIS, NAVEDA D. BUS DRIVER 6308 CHIPPEWA GIRLS P.E.,/ATHLETICS 119 BLENDEN FOOD SERVICE WORKER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOOD AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 753-6276 704 EAST MILITARY NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 LAKEWOODE LEM BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT AIDE LtWIS, REBECCA S. 562-5643 63 BELMONT DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NORTHEAST SPEECH THERAPIST *13/24 LILES, CAROLE G 758-7724 4421 GREENWAY DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS THIRD YEAR LILLY, CAROLYN SUE 758-7132 RT 11, BOX 289K NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY ELEM FOURTH YEAR LINEBARGER, JO EVELYN 753-3207 45 DESOTO C~ NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, ASST. SUPT.-INSTRUCTION LIPSMEYER, L. LOUENE 663-6816 312 NO. WOODROWST . LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 ARGENTA SIXTH YEAR LITTLE, DARLENE C. 568-9420 5702 TRENTON LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 OLE MAIN JOURNALISM, ENGLISH II, SPEC. ED. LIVELY, BOBBYE 758-3716 2821 DELMAR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODJ R SECRETARY 37 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT L. CITY LOCKWOOD, LEAH 843-3524 PIKE VIEW LOFTON, DWIGHT 758-6955 #29 SPRING VALLEY ROAD CHAPTER I AIDE A. ROSE CITY JR LONDON, CYNTHIA 676-3174 CENTRAL LONG, GAYEL. 758-7384 NORTH HEIGHTS LONG, MARY P. 945-0674 ROSE CITY JR LOOMIS, NANCY L. 5901 J.F.K. APT. 721 CIVICS, ATHLETICS c. 113 WILSON, APT. B SPEECH THERAPIST 3516 N. OLIVE ST SPEECH THERAPIST 2313 LANSBROOK READING 8, 9 834-3270 502 AUTUMNBROOKC R. PARK HILL CHAPTER I AIDE *46/43 LOPEZ, CHARLENE L. 758-3497 5513 GRANBY RD REDWOOD MR/LD RESOURCE ZIP CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LONOKE AR 72086 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LOVE, CAROLYN 758-0500 AMBOY LOVELADY, DAN 4401 SCHAER ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 WAREHOUSE LOWE, KAYE 753-0439 PINE LUCAS, REVA 945-2802 LYNCH DRIVE LUCAS, REVA 945-2802 REDWOOD LUTHY, FRED A. 753-0104 NORTHEAST LYBARGER, CINDY 753-4124 PIKE VIEW LYMAN, JOYCE 227-9127 CENTRAL MABRY, VICKY R. FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER 6605 ALLWOOD PRINCIPAL 2603 E. WASHINGTON CROSSING GUARD 2603 E. WASHINGTON LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 4008 MELLENE HEAD CUSTODIAN L. 5416 BELL POINT LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 41 FOREST CR. SCIENCE 753-1153 P.O. BOX 4196 ADMN. OFFICE NUTRITION COORDINATOR MACE, PAULAS. 851-7430 9020 CONWAY HWY LYNCH DRIVE SELF CONTAINED MR 38 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRES'S ASSIGNMENT MACKLIN, DIANA LYNN 268-8382 RT. 1, BOX 68B PIKE VIEW FIFTH YEAR MAGNESS, SHIRLEY V. 945-1950 2 WRIGHT CR LYNCH DRIVE SECRETARY MAHER, JIMMY D. 470-0376 WAREHOUSE MALONE, FRANCES 224-7732 RT. 1, BOX 106-D GENERAL LABOR N. 3306 BOYD REDWOOD MANN, PAMELA 758-3442 SELF CONTAINED MR ROSE 210 W. 51ST ST. BUS DRIVER MANZ, ALEXANDER A. 568-6901 5911 TIMBERSIDE OLE MAIN MARLIN, CAROLYN GERMAN 945-4860 503 WATER ROSE CITY ELEM THIRD YEAR MARSHALL, LEONARD E. RD. 376-8306 800 BEECH ST, APT #45 SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE WORKER MARSHALL, NANCY L. 835-6031 100 BEACONSFIELD AMBOY MR/LO RESOURCE MARSHALL, SHIRLEY A. 664-9476 5223 W. 31ST STREET CENTRAL READING SE MARTIN, BETTY F. 753-1467 1108 NELBROOK CITY ARGENTA MEDIA CLERK (*39/43) MARTIN, BRENDA K, 982-2991 26 WRIGHT CIRCLE MEADOWP ARK MEDIA SPECIALIST MARTIN, CALVIN J, 758-2602 809 W. 33RD ROSE CITY JR CUSTODIAN MARTIN, CARVIN 945-1312 NORTHEAST 5223 SO WOODLAND CUSTODIAN MARTIN, DARLENE 374-3038 1820 WEST 16TH BUS DRIVER MARTIN, DEBORAH 945-1312 5223 SO. WOODLAND NORTHEAST CUSTODIAN MARTIN, DIANN 372-4593 P.O. BOX 9012 BUS AIDE 39 ZIP MCRAE AR 72102 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MAYFLOWER, AR 72106 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOOD, R 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72119 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT MARTIN, JAMES JR. 945-1312 GLENVIEW MARTIN, LAVONNE 5223 SO. WOODLAND CUSTODIAN CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 RT. 11, BOX 289Y NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN ENGLISH III, SPANISH II, III MARTIN, LETITIA R. 834-1469 7907 PINTO TRAIL SHERWOOD AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER COORDINATOR MARTIN, MICHELLE V. 945-0092 2307 E. 2ND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SEVENTH STREET FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER MARTIN, SARA J. 753-5188 3104 DONAGHEY DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FIFTH YEAR MARTIN, TELELA J. 945-0730 101 WALTON CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE WORKER MARTIN, TERI LEA 834-2800 2500 SEMINOLE TR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE THIRD YEAR MARTINDALE, ANN 945-7442 712 ELLEN DR LYNCH DRIVE FIRST YEAR MASCUILLI, SAM JOSEPH 221-1262 15 RED MAPLE CT NORTHEAST PSYCHOLOGY MASHBURN, CHARLES A. 664-0733 124 WOODROW CENTRAL GEOGRAPHY MASSEY, BILLIE JUNE 753-7727 4501 LAKEVIEW RD NORTHEAST GUIDANCE SECRETARY MASSEY, JERRY WAREHOUSE MASSEY, JERRY D. 758-5990 7817 NORTH HILLS BLVD. ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR, SCHOOL PLANT MASTERSON, OSCAR E. 843-2212 RT. 4, BOX 169B WAREHOUSE HEATING \u0026amp; A/C MATTHEWS, ANNETTE 851-3159 13 OAK FOREST LOOP ADMN. OFFICE VOCATIONAL EVALUATOR MATTHEWS, BETTIANNE H. 851-2567 #15 LONE PINE PINE SIXTH YEAR MATTOCKS, JUANITA 116 PULASKI ST. SEVENTH STREET CUSTODIAN 40 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SERVICES CABOT AR 72023 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MATTOX, MARGIE ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 771-0358 4716 BUNKER HILL DR SEVENTH STREET FIRST YEAR MAXAM, DENISE G. 835-5089 6904 INCAS MEADOWP ARK KINDERGARTEN MAXWELL, JACKIE 753-3091 4710 GLENMERE RD. MEADOWP ARK THIRD YEAR MAXWELL, JIMMY L. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 834-3463 6328 HOPI NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BOONE PARK MEDIA MAXWELL, SARAC. 834-3463 6328 HOPI NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SKILLS CENTER SPECIAL EDUCATION MAY, FAYE LOUISE 835-3052 6301 IROQUOIS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER MCADAMS, CAROL ANN 227-5254 17 MISTY COURT LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NORTHEAST DRAMA I, II, COMM MCAFEE, MARJORIE E. 225-7491 47 KINGSBRIDGE WAY LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 OLE MAIN GEOMETRY, MATH I, II MCCANN, CONNIE S. 851-3772 50 OPHELIA DR MAUMELLE, AR 72118 RIDGEROAD ART 8 - 9 MCCASTER, ROSIE L. 834-3252 RT. 4, BOX 30 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PINE FOOD SERVICE WORKER MCCAULEY, GLORIA L. 753-3737 4904 N VINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY MCCLAIN, VIVIAN D. 455-1881 5410 TIMBERLAND DRIVE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE MCCLINTON, JANE P. 835-1586 7905 BEECHFIELD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW SECOND YEAR MCCOLLOUGH, MARY 835-5487 #12 CHINOOK CR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST ACCOUNTING I, RECORD KEEPING, KEYBOARDING MCCOLLUM, ANN S. 758-2434 4521 AUSTIN DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST GUIDANCE COUNSELOR MCCONNELL, AVA 945-2735 509 ELLEN DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY JR MCCORD, AUBREY 753-8761 NORTH HEIGHTS FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER I. 1020 W. 45TH CUSTODIAN 41 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MCCOY, DARRELL 843-3280 OLE MAIN MCCOY, JOHN J. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT G. RT. 1 BOX 400 DRAFTING WAREHOUSE MCCULLOUGH, 945-0677 RT . 1 , BOX 12 7 GENERAL LABOR MILDRED 304 N. PALM STREET MCDANIEL, RACHEL M. 758-6712 4105 MONTICELLO REDWOOD FIRST/SECOND YEARS MCDONALD, PATRICIA A. 835-3793 6316 BLACKHAWKDR CITY ZIP AUSTIN AR 72007 MAYFLOWERA R 72106 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR COMPUTER LAB MANAGER MCDONALD, PATRICIA S. 753-4263 3004 MARTINEAU CENTRAL MEDIA SPECIALIST MCDOWELL, LAURAL. 835-0151 8 KONAWA CT. CENTRAL HEALTH MCDOWELL, MYRTILLA 753-6499 431 MCCAIN VV N14 INDIAN HILLS LUNCH PERIOD AID MCDOWELL, MYRTILLA M. 753-6499 431 MCCAIN VV-N14 INDIAN HILLS CUSTODIAN MCDOWELL, ROYS. 374-4602 722 SHERMAN RIDGEROAD COMM 9(HC), COMM 8 MCGEE, SHIRLEY R. 753-2241 5124 CHANDLER PIKE VIEW CHAPTER I AIDE/ 44 MCGHEE, LAURA T. 758-6468 #5 VALERIE COURT CENTRAL GEOGRAPHY MCGINLEY, DONNAS K. 851-3978 #6 CLEMATIS OLE MAIN CHILD DEVELOPMENT, MCGINNIS, CAROLYN SUE 843-8299 13 JORDAN BOONE PARK FOURTH YEAR 3 72 4 LOCHRIDGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OHE, SAC CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MCGLOTHIN, DENA 758-0795 LAKEWOODJ R MCGOHAN, CAROLYN ENGLISH, COMMUNICATIONS 753-1969 4415 ORANGE ST CRESTWOOD SECRETARY MCGUIRE, BESSIE 945-0386 ARGENTA RT. 4, BOX 486C LUNCH AIDE 42 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT MCGUIRE, LUVENIA ARGENTA MCKAIG, ANN C. 753-7381 RT. 4, BOX 486C LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 2517 FRANKLIN B.A. AIDE MCMILLEN, MARTHA B. 679-4844 RT. 2, BOX 1121 ADMN. OFFICE HOMEBOUNDT EACHER MCMILLION, KATHRYN L. 753-8972 100 ARIZONA AVE. REDWOOD CHAPTER I AIDE MCMUNN, KIMBERLY D. 888-6006 #8 GREEN ACRES DR. ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY MCMURRY, JAMES A. JR. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 GREENBRIER, AR 72058 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 MABELVALE, AR 72103 835-7624 132 VERONA CIRCLE SHERWOOD AR 72116 NORTHEAST MKTG. ED. I,II, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MARKETING MCMURRY, NANCY 835-7624 NORTHEAST MCNEESE, DIANA L. R. 132 VERONA CIRCLE MEDIA SPECIALIST 771-1443 3907 N. MAPLE PIKE VIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE MCPHERSON, DAVID M. 327-2302 845 CENTER ST, APT B BARING CROSS SELF CONTAINED MR MCPHERSON, JOYCE I. 945-7772 423 PARKDALE LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE WORKER MEABON, LEVERTA 945-5144 GLENVIEW MELTON, CYNTHIA 758-9659 AMBOY MENARD, THELMA P.O. BOX 3003 CHAPTER I AIDE SUE 5 FOXBORO C MR-LD RESvURCE 758-7948 602 W 22ND CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER MEURER, ANDREA J. 664-5945 5118 R ST. ARGENTA RESOURCE SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTL ROCK AR 72118 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 MICHAEL, KAY C. 221-1577 MEADOW PARK MICKLES, LINDA 758-5126 7820 W. CAPITOL, APT 610 LITTLE ROCK AR FIRST YEAR 72205 CAFE. OFFICE MILLER, MARY C. 753-7429 PIKE VIEW F. #88 EASTGATE TERRACE APT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE 6501 RUSTIC LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 43 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MILLER, NANCY B. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 835-4039 105 N BEVERLY GLENVIEW SECOND MILLER, PATRICIA L. CITY 455-3761 6821 HONEYSUCKLE LN #6 ROSE CITY JR TEACHER AIDE MILLER, SANDRA D. 753-6780 6301 CAMP ROBINSON #121C BELWOOD MR RESOURCE (*45/39) MILLICAN, CAROLYN R. 329-5875 #32 CHERYL DR CENTRAL MATH/SCIENCE SE MILLS, DEAN W. 758-0584 3805 ORANGE ST ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY MISEE, TOMMY H. 327-0747 #11 MILLPOND DR WAREHOUSE LEAD PLUMBER MITCHELL, DEBORAH A. 753-2886 3906 HILLSIDE DR NORTHEAST CHAPTER I AIDE MITCHELL, MARGARET ANN 753-3937 801 W. 55TH NORTH HEIGHTS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE MITCHELL, RUBY F. 753-4863 6109 GREEN BANK RD ADMN. OFFICE HEAD BOOKKEEPER MOMPHREY, BETTY J. 2910 E. 2ND ST. ARGENTA FOOD SERVICE WORKER MONTGOMERY, HESTER 562-1591 P.O. BOX 9331 BUS DRIVER MONTGOMERY, 753-6009 REDWOOD NANCY A. MOODY, BONNIE G. 4505 DAWSON FIRST YEAR 676-6307 RT. 3, BOX 478 RIDGEROAD PHYS. SCIENCE MOODY, SHERLENE 961-1728 RT. 1, BOX 14 7 A-16 ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR CONWAY AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR CONWAY AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR LONOKE AR NO LITTLE ROCK AR MEADOW PARK FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER MOORE, CARL 758-4896 222 EAST E. ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR OLE MAIN AMERICAN HISTORY, PSYCHOLOGY MOORE, DOROTHY J. 851-6250 112 DIAMOND POINTE MAUMELLE AR AMBOY SECOND/THIRD YEAR MOORE, JOHN H. 834-5006 5705 NORTH HILLS BLVD NO LITTLE ROCK AR ADMN. OFFICE ASST. SUPT.-INSTRUCTION 44 72116 72204 72118 72032 72118 72032 7 2118 72118 72118 72114 72119 72116 72086 72117 72116 72118 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION MOORE, KAY A. 758-0474 BOONE PARK MOORE, LORAINE 374-9919 CRESTWOOD MOORE, MARGARET 851-1217 CENTRAL MOORE, MARY E . 834-5006 CENTRAL MOORE, NANCY H. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 6509 ALLWOOD THIRD/FOURTH YEARS J. 816 CEDAR FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS L. #7 PAR DR. SCIENCE 5705 NORTH HILLS BLVD READING CITY 753-6675 4809 NO. HICKORY, APT. 6 ADMN. OFFICE PSYCHOLOGIST MORGAN, ANNIE M. 661-1761 66 FLAG RD LAKEWOOD ELEM THIRD YEAR MORLEDGE, KATHY 771-1901 1707 CRESTWOOD CENTRAL SECONDARY PRINCIPAL MORRIS, JAMES C. 851-7565 112 OAKRIDGE COVE OLE MAIN PRINCIPAL MORRIS, JOHNNY LEE 771-4670 1405 W. 39TH BUS MECHANIC MORRIS, KAREN A. 225-5437 801 s. RODNEY PARHAM BOONE PARK FIRST/KINDERGARTEN MORRIS, LAURA P. 562-8074 4115 WALKER AMBOY FOOD SERVICE WORKER MORRIS, NANCY E. 888-2789 RT 9, BOX 203 #140 ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, COMPUTER SERVICES MORRIS, PATSY S. 758-3551 1809 MILLCREEK RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD GEN MATH, ALG I MORRISON, CHARLES W 835-5214 108 CALLAWAY SHERWOOD AR 72116 WAREHOUSE LEAD CARPENTER MORROW, NORMA J. 753-4546 2221 CRESTWOOD RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY SIXTH YEAR MULLEN, NELL R. 945-9169 603 WATER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, MEDIA SERVICES MURDAUGH, DOTTIE A. 835-4193 6609 CURRY CT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEARS 45 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP MURRAY, MARYE. 753-4081 5624 APPLEWOOD DRIVE PRINCIPAL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PARK HILL MUSE, JANICE M. 835-4535 7924 CLAREMONT SHERWOOD AR NORTH HEIGHTS MYERS, DOROTHY I. MEDIA CLERK/OFFICE *44/41 565-1248 P.O. BOX 9634 LITTLE ROCK, AR ROSE CITY JR SELF CONTAINED MR NAGEL, HAMIYET 988-5461 NORTHEAST NARKINSKY, JOHN 835-1122 NORTHEAST NAYLOR, JANET S. RT. 3, BOX 216A,#6 JACKSONVILLE AR BIOLOGY, PHY SCIENCE c. 500 BURNTWOOD SHERWOOD AR FOOTBALL COACH, PRE-ALGEBRA 72116 72219 72076 72116 835-1883 6401 PAWNEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE VOCATIONAL PARA-PROFESSIONAL NEAL, ANNETTE M. 945-1613 62 KNIGHT DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LYNCH DRIVE FOOD SERVICE WORKER NEESE, MARCELLA M. 945-9443 324 EMILY ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOODE LEM FOOD SERVICE WORKER NELSON, NORMAL. 868-5494 RT 5 BOX 577-B LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 LYNCH DRIVE FIFTH YEAR NELSON, S. RENEE 758-5480 3801 S. MCCAIN PARK APT S NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA, ALGEBRA I NELSON, SHIRLEY A. 758-3413 1916 CRUTCHER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER NESS, MARGARET A. 835-6291 5716 WOODRIDGE LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY NEUMEIER, SHANON KAY 851-1861 32 VICTORIA MAUMELLE, AR 72118 GLENVIEW SIXTH YEAR NICHOALDS, DELLA M. 758-9072 P.O. BOX 1328 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 CENTRAL SAC MANAGER NICHOLS, JOYCE J. 661-1916 1801 GEORGIA #2 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 PIKE VIEW RESOURCE NICHOLS, REATHA P. 753-7998 1904 POPLAR ST, APT #B NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 OLE MAIN FOOD SERVICE WORKER NIESTADT, SAUNDRA K. 268-7066 1511 RIVER AVE SEARCY AR 72143 MEADOWP ARK FIRST YEAR 46 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION NOAH, JUDY G. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 834-2909 108 ROBIN GLEN ROSE CITY JR ENGLISH SE NOBLETT, BARBARA J. 961-9469 402 DORTCH LOOP CITY BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE NOLAND, JOHN M. 834-3503 2011 AZTEC DR, APT 1407 ROSE CITY JR COMMUNICATIONS 8,9 NORMAN, KATHRYN M. RT . 4 , BOX 9 5-C NORTH HEIGHTS KINDERGARTEN NORMAN, VIRGINIA L. 835-1355 2604 SEMINOLE TR PINE KINDERGARTEN M. ZIP SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CABOT AR 72023 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 #6 SHARONDALE COVE MAUMELLE AR NORRIS, BETTY 851-3140 LAKEWOODJ R O'DELL, CONNI J. 72118 PRE-ALG, MATH 8, ALGEBRA 1 676-2911 REMINGTON RUN, NORTH HEIGHTS FOURTH YEAR O'DELL, DAVID WAREHOUSE O'DELL, DAVID W. BOX 301-10 LONOKE AR 72086 676-2911 REMINGTON RT3, BOX 301-10 LONOKE AR 72086 WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER OBERLE, SANDRA J. 835-0561 30 JACKSON OAKS PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR ODOM, ARTHUR L. 851-6308 5901 EVERETT RIDGEROAD PHY. SCIENCE ODOM, FELICIE P. 758-4531 6608 GREEN BANK RD ROSE CITY ELEM FIRST/SECOND OGDEN, CLARENCE LEE JR. WAREHOUSE OGDEN, JOY FAYE 843-4917 ARGENTA OKEH, OKEZIE N. 1723 POPLAR CUSTODIAN 41 BRIARWOOD CUSTODIAN YEARS 568-8160 6016 SENATE DR B LAKEWOODE LEM CUSTODIAN OLIGER, JANELLE 753-8898 5709 MARION BOONE PARK SECRETARY OTWELL, DEBRA A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CABOT AR 72023 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 771-4981 5208 WALNUT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN KEYBOARDING, COE, SHORTHAND I 47 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP PAPINEAU, DEBORAH A. 851-7124 fl OAK FOREST LANE BOONE PARK SECOND YEAR PARKER, BRENDA A. 2000 PARKWAY VLGE, #518 CUSTODIAN SUE MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK PARKER, BRENDA 835-9655 INDIAN HILLS #48 TENNYSON CT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PHYSICAL THERAPIST 48/30 PARKER, ELIZABETH 771-2882 4919 OAKLAWND R CRESTWOOD SIXTH YEAR PARKER, GLENDA G. 227-6207 #6 BAYWOODC T SEVENTH STREET SPEECH THERAPIST PARKER, RENITA G. 565-7543 6804 ASHER AVE., APT. 62 PIKE VIEW SIXTH YEAR PARTRIDGE, PATRICIA J. 771-2041 4528 VALLEY BROOK OLE MAIN KEYBOARD I PATTERSON, SCOTT C. 843-2309 RT. 2, BOX 287-A BOONE PARK FIFTH YEAR PAUL, MARSHA Y. 227-4055 #59 KINGS PARK SEVENTH STREET PRINCIPAL PEACOCK, MARY K. 835-7763 1704 OKMULGEE SEVENTH STREET LUNCH PERIOD AIDE PEARSALL, VALERIE 664-8909 6401 KENWOOD RD PARK HILL SPEECH THERAPIST E. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AUSTIN AR 72007 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 PEARSON, JAMES 835-4711 ADMN. OFFICE PEARSON, PATSY 7608 TOMAHAWKD R NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FOOD SERVICES 835-4711 7608 TOMAHAWKD R NORTHEAST COE, WORD PROCESSING, PECK, CASSANDRA M. 945-1852 11 SYDNEY RD ROSE CITY ELEM FIFTH YEAR PEDERSON, SHIRLEY 320 W. 14TH ARGENTA PEDERSON, SHIRLEY CROSSING GUARD 374-8554 320 WEST 14TH ARGENTA LUNCH PERIOD AIDE PERDUE, STEVEN E. 835-9735 6200 PONTIAC RIDGEROAD AMERICAN HISTORY 8 48 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 KEYBOARDING NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDREss ASSIGNMENT PERKINS, MARLA C. 513 GLYNN LANE SELF CONTAINED MR CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BARING CROSS PERRY, SUE 753-3372 116 MONTANA DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN ENGLISH II, CREAT WRIT I, II, STUDY HALL PETEN, KELVIN 945-0619 2104 EDMONDS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN PETIT, JEAN 842-2846 217 SO. HINCKLEY ENGLAND AR 72046 OLE MAIN GUIDANCE SECRETARY PETROSS, JULIE A. 753-2892 4419 ORANGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE PETTUS, OTIS L. 221-3689 3117 ELAM LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE HELPER PFLUGHAUPT, MARY J. 835-5162 15 CARDINAL VALLEY DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 CENTRAL .MATH PHARO, M. JANN 771-4116 3666P, MCCAIN PARK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 BOONE PARK MR/LD RESOURCE PHAUP, STEPHEN 753-1517 6 DESOTO CR N LITTLE ROCK, AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR - SPECIAL SERVICES PHAUP, VALERIE B. 753-1517 6 DESOTO CR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE MEDIA SPECIALIST PHELPS, LARRY G. 565-9595 5011 GREENFIELD DR LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 WAREHOUSE ENERGY SPECIALIST PHILLIPS, BOBBIE LU 327-2460 1403 BEAN ST. CONWAY AR 72032 PINE RESOURCE PHILLIPS, TAMMY L. 888-6944 13221 ADAMS DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 SUBSTITUTE BUS DRIVER PICKETT, JAMES R. 758-8648 5109 RANDLOPH RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN COACH, BOYS PE I,II,III, SAC PIERCE, CAROLYN J. 753-7744 3405 MCCORD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD MEDIA CLERK/GUIDANCE CLERK PIERCE, JUDY K. 834-1582 7409 EAGLE POINT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS FIRST YEAR PIERSON, JUDY B. 225-2519 12311 SHAWNEE FOREST DR. LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 BARING CROSS CCE COORDINATOR 49 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION PIKER, ALETHA ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 753-0856 5913 GRANBY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CENTRAL GUIDANCE CLERK PINKERTON, K. MARK 753-7548 108 LINDERHURST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY JR COACH, EARTH SCIENCE, BOYS P.E. PITTMAN, WANDA W. 771-0785 3305 NO. OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS MR/LO RESOURCE PLOSZAY, JANE 753-0338 725 W. \"A\" NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SEVENTH STREET THIRD YEAR PONDER, ANNE S. 753-4982 #5 MCKEE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST MATH, ALG I, II, INT. ALG. POOL, CHERYLL. 843-8646 RT. 1 BOX 466 AUSTI AR 72007 BELWOOD SIXTH YEAR PORTER, NANCY JO 851-4501 7 POMEGRANATED R. AMBOY COMPUTER LAB AIDE PORTER, NATALIE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 758-4294 2313 LANSBROOK OLE MAIN POWELL, ELVIN L. ENGLISH II, III NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 375-9332 112 MELROSE CR OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 POWER, MARY M. 834-8552 OLE MAIN 603 PEMBROKE SHERWOODA R 72116 POWER, PORTIA L. WORD PROCESSING, COMPUTER ACCOUNTING I,II 771-2395 #17 EAST LAKE DR LAKEWOODE LEM PRINCIPAL POWER, VALENCIA K. 758-5834 6408 GREEN BANK INDIAN HILLS FIFTH YEAR PRATT, SANDRA M. 945-7170 216 CHERLY STREET NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER PRICE, ALBERT P. LYNCH DRIVE PRIEST, CHARLES 758-6002 CENTRAL PROWELL, JIMMIE 568-8119 3930 LOCHRIDGE CUSTODIAN L. P.O. BOX 1654 CUSTODIAN s. 6824 CAROLINA DR SKILLS CENTER SPECIAL EDUCATION PURIFOY, FONDA L. 374-8184 1312 NANNETTE ST BELWOOD CHAPTER I AIDE 50 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO. LITTLE ROCK, 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 7211 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION PURTLE, DAMARIS 758-9910 OLE MAIN QUARRY, CINDY A. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT K. 3607 AVONDALE MEDIA SPECIALIST CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 215 ELMRIDGE LAKEWOODJR COACH/COUNSELOR, LITTLE ROCK AR P. E., SAC 72211 QUATTLEBAUM, JUDITH ANN 225-2474 26 KINGSBRIDGE WAY ROSE CITY JR ENGLISH I RAGLAND, KATHY A. 758-8953 5925 VALERIE DR AMBOY MEDIA/OFFICE CLERK RAMEY, KATHRYN R. 753-7974 2704 DONAGHEY DR LAKEWOODJ R ALGEBRA I, GEOMETRY RAMSEY, LEE 753-2361 PARK HILL 3801 ORANGE CUSTODIAN RAPIER, KERRY DALE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72212 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 221-0902 14312 RIDGEWOOD DR LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2211 RIDGEROAD HISTORY, HEALTH 8, CIVICS RASUL-LLAH, BETTY 945-2073 5106 S. WOODLAND BUS DRIVER RATLIFF, SHERRY ANN 835-0383 103 CORONADO CENTRAL SOCIAL STUDIES RAYE, EARNEST 945-1256 217 S. LAUREL BUS DRIVER REAVES, BIRLEATHER 374-3977 422 W 32ND NORTH HEIGHTS FOURTH YEAR REAVES, ROGER 0. 753-1735 2 LENWOOD CT LAKEWOODJ R CIVICS REBSAMEN, PATRICIA A. 753-6208 5008 RANDOLPH GLENVIEW SECRETARY REDDEN, CLARA L. 664-5630 2005 S HARRISON GLENVIEW FIRST YEAR REEVES, MELISSA M. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 758-6836 209 TIMBERLINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LYNCH DRIVE SELF CONTAINED MR AIDE RESTER, KATHY R. 851-7044 #1 FOREST DALE DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSE CLERK, FOOD SERVICE REYNOLDS, SUZZETTE 5208 SYCAMORE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN ART I, II, III DRILL TEAM 51 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT A. 4806 SCHAER CITY RHOADES, PATSY 758-0878 BARING CROSS RHODES, LORA B. SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE 758-3804 GLENVIEW 5901 JFK BLVD #4005 FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS RICE, BERTHA 945-3912 ROSE CITY JR RICHBOURG, MARY 835-3956 ADMN. OFFICE RICKS, OTHA DEAN P.O. BOX 3485 FOOD SERVICE SUE 118 VERNONA CR SECRETARY 758-9583 216 E. REED RD WORKER OLE MAIN HEAD CUSTODIAL RIDGEWAY, KATHERINE E. 835-9798 109 MAY STREET AMBOY FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS RIGSBY, A. WILENE 753-4073 4306 IDLEWILD RIDGEROAD EARTH SCIENCE RITCHIE, SUZANNE E. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 758-5408 3420 N OLIVE RIDGEROAD COMM. 9, COMM. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 8, ENGLISH ROBBINS, DON JAMES 834-8349 103 SHADY GROVE SHERWOOD AR 72116 OLE MAIN AM. HIST, WORLD GEOG. ROBBINS, JON 753-7117 3806 POPE NO LITTLE ROCK A 72116 NORTHEAST CHEMISTRY, CHEMISTRY H ROBERTSON, ARLEAN M 375-2698 803 E. 13TH ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTHEAST RESOURCE, RESOURCE BIOLOGY ROBERTSON, JANE. 835-4890 2705 OZARK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS SIXTH YEAR ROBERTSON, PATSY 753-7279 5009 RANDOLPH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOOD ROBERTSON, 758-6266 JR HOME EC. I, PL SKILLS 8 VICTORIA E. OLE MAIN 124 COLLEGE PARK CR FOOD SERVICE WORKER ROBIE, PATRICIA A. 945-1296 2708 GRIBBLE ARGENTA FOOD SERVICE WORKER ROBINSON, ARTHUR LEE JR. 375-6837 609 HICKORY REDWOOD SIXTH YEAR ROBINSON, BEVERLY KAY 945-1118 5011 GLENVIEW BLVD. PARK HILL KINDERGARTEN/FIRST 52 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT ROBINSON, IDA LEE 945-3417 5214 SOUTH WOODLAND BUS DRIVER ROBINSON, JOYCE L. 758-4763 19 THERESA DR LAKEWOODE LEM CHAPTER I AIDE ROBINSON, MARY F. CITY 2500 WILLOW ST, APT #1202 FOOD SERVICE WORKER B. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK ROBINSON, ROSE 945-2830 400 N. PALM, #70 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CAFE. OFFICE RODGERS, ANNETTE FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE 753-4856 908 E 57TH PL ARGENTA FOURTH YEAR RODGERS, BEVERLY G. 835-6640 7016 FLINTROCK LAKEWOODE LEM FOURTH/FIFTH YEAR RODGERS, LEONA M. 758-1593 444 MCCAIN BLVD. PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE WORKER ROGERS, MALA J. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 255-3337 P.O. BOX 436 HAZEN AR 72064 NORTHEAST ENGLISH III HONORS, ENG. III CB, ENGLISH IIIB ROGERS, ROBIN M. 945-0568 2217 E. WASHINGTON AVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER ROLAND, MONTINE 753-2670 3507 FLORA BELWOOD FOOD SERVICE WORKER ROMES, LINDA J. 758-5478 622 E. 19TH, APT 111 PINE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE ROSE, CAROL ANN 834-1645 7216 FLINTROCK PARK HILL THIRD YEAR ROWE, JOHN D AMBOY ROWLAN,D MARY 834-6015 PIKE VIEW RUDKIN, BERT ARGENTA RUDKIN, BERT 771-0326 ARGENTA RUNSICK, DANA 835-7512 BELWOOD 512 WILLOW CUSTODIAN E. 6425 PONTIAC 110 PARKVIEW DR. CROSSING GUARD 110 PARKVIEW DR LUNCH PERIOD AIDE L. 105A ALMOND COVE FIRST YEAR 53 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION RYAN, JACKIE ADDREss ASSIGNMENT 835-9118 906 COULTER AVE OLE MAIN ENGLISH IV SALLIS, ROSEANNE 835-0476 20 OAKBROOK OLE MAIN PE, COACH, HEALTH SALTMARSH, JEANIE M. 834-0598 117 LAGRUE CITY CRESTWOOD KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR SANDEFUR, RANDY H. ZIP SHERWOOD AR 72116 SHERWOOD, AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 758-5381 4122 BURKS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN ASST. COACH, HEALTH, BASEBALL SARTIN, LOU ANN 945-1575 SKILLS CENTER SARTIN, MALYNDA 945-9315 Mf:ADOW PARK SATTERFIELD, PAM 13 QUILLEN SECRETARY C. 9 SANDLEFOOT SECRETARY 758-6935 5801 LOCUST COVE PIKE VIEW LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SCHILB, CYNTHIA B. 834-7450 2221 E. MARYLAND CENTRAL READING SCHNARR, LORETTA K. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 771-1680 RT. 11, BOX 249C SKILLS CENTER SPECIAL EDUCATION NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 (RESOURCE) SCHOLL, JANG. 835-9771 NORTHEAST SCHULTZ, MARY 982-5259 OLE MAIN 7005 INCAS SPANISH I, II LEE 1300 MILITARY ROAD SPEECH THERAPY *12/25 SCOGGINS, IRA T. 945-3605 5100 S. WOODLANDD R OLE MAIN CCE COORDINATOR, SAC SCOGINS, ELLENS. 961-9335 RT. 1, BOX 135B MEADOWP ARK SIXTH YEAR SCOTT, CURTIS EDWARD 661-9877 P. 0. BOX 1284 CENTRAL MATH SCOTT, JERALINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ENGLAND AR 72046 LITTLE ROCK AR 72203 835-5200 7016 JACKSONVILLE HWY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SCOTT, LOIS M. 851-4704 P.O. BOX 932 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 BARING CROSS MEDIA SPECIALIST BARING CROSS/SKILLS CENTER SCOTT, MARCIA T. 535-4894 407 E. 16TH PINE BLUFF, AR 71601 AMBOY FIFTH YEAR 54 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT SCOTT, MARILYN M. 664-0896 2215 BLACKWOOD CITY RIDGEROAD ENGLISH I, ENGLISH 8 SCROGGINS, EULA 374-4724 1421 W. 12TH BOONE PARK CUSTODIAN SEIDL, CATHERINE 821-2238 151 WHISPERING PINE RD INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN SELF, LINDA A. 834-0266 #7 ARBOR OAKS DR NORTH HEIGHTS FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS SERIO, SHARON 868-4217 4425 BEAR TREE DR ARGENTA ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR SETZLER, NANCY J. 834-0543 1409 WEWOKA PINE THIRD YEAR SHADDOX, ALTA 753-7880 5721 N CEDAR NORTH HEIGHTS MEDIA SPECIALIST SHADDOX, LINDA ANN ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72210 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 329-2827 831 NUTTER CHAPEL RD,C-24 CONWAY AR 72032 BOONE PARK FOURTH YEAR SHADLE, ANNE P. 835-8864 8700 MERRYMEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 REDWOOD MEDIA SPECIALIST SHAUNFIELD, SUSAN A. 835-5477 1605 WEWOKA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE 31(.60) 41(.40) SHEEHAN, NANCY 666-2177 4812 CLUB RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 CENTRAL ENGLISH SHEPPARD, KATHY E. 374-3820 112 SO. SPRUCE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER SHERROD, HARRIETT 834-7253 6205 PAWNEE DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PINE KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR SHIELDS, MADIE LEE 375-3360 BLDG 6, APT 43 SHT GDNS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS AIDE SHOEMAKER, PATRICIA A. 868-5620 #9 MAYWOODM ANOR LITTLE ROCK AR 72212 PIKE VIEW SPEECH THERAPIST SHORT, ANNA F. 945-7617 APT. 63, PROTHO MANOR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NORTHEAST CUSTODIAN SHUFFIELD, MARY E. 758-4797 2405 N. BERKLEY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BELWOOD MEDIA CLERK (*45/36) 55 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION SIAS, SHARON D. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 945-0030 P.O. BOX 3452 CITY NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER SIEGEL, PATRICIAN. 834-2982 1712 WAR EAGLE BOONE PARK PRINCIPAL SIFFORD, DEBORAH K. 771-4124 5901 JFK #3201 LAKEWOODE LEM KINDERGARTEN/FIRST SIMMONS, SUE H. 753-3959 44 DESOTO CRESTWOOD FIFTH YEAR SIMON, CHIRSTY L. 2035 TOPF ROAD REDWOOD THIRD YEAR SIMS, REATHA M. 374-3097 1208 E. 17TH PINE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE SISCO, CAROL G. 834-7543 108 FORK RIVER RD SEVENTH STREET FOURTH YEAR SISK, IVAN 945-0150 ROSE CITY JR SLATON, PHYLLIS 565-4014 PIKE VIEW SLATTON, THOMAS 333-2792 ROSE CITY JR SMITH, ANDREW T. 316 CHERYL CUSTODIAN R. #4 GLENMERE DR MR/LD RESOURCE w. WILSON LAT, #20 EARTH SCIENCE, 945-7911 128 1/2 DAVIS ST. SEVENTH STREET CUSTODIAN SMITH, ANITA J. 666-1042 ARGENTA SMITH, BILLY J. 122 S. WOODROW KINDERGARTEN SAC YEARS ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 ROLAND AR 72135 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 753-2439 203 SHAMROCK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN SMITH, BILLY RAY 758-9769 2001 ORANGE ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SMITH, CAROLYNM . 753-7439 NORTHEAST SMITH, CRYSTAL 771-1167 P.O. BOX 4022 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 KEYBOARDING/KEYBOARDINGA PPLICATION I L. PARK HILL SMITH, DEBBIE A. 5300 SUMMERTREE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 374-5195 810 ORANGE ST. BUS DRIVER 56 NO LTITLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION SMITH, DEBRA K. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 374-6538 110 NO. BEECH BUS DRIVER SMITH, E. GRANT 753-7050 5201 FAIRWAY, #12 CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LAKEWOODJ R ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SMITH, FRANK J. 945-7567 801 GREENLEA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 MEADOW PARK CUSTODIAN SMITH, GLORIA A. 753-4940 801 VALERIE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SUPV. SPEC. ED. SMITH, HAZEL BOYD 372-2385 1855 IZARD LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 ROSE CITY JR AM HISTORY 8 704 ELLEN DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 CUSTODIAN SMITH, JAMES H. 945-7809 MEADOW PARK SMITH, JAMES R. 835-3036 6315 NAVAJO TRAIL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SMITH, JOHN A. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS 327-2225 INDIAN HILLS SMITH, KATHY H. 227-4346 NORTHEAST SMITH, MARY ANN 909 HEATHER CR ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL CONWAY AR 72032 6 COACHLIGHT DRIVE LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ENG. IV(H), ENG. IV CB, ENG. IV B 374-6866 RIDGEROAD SMITH, NORMA F. 945-0484 ARGENTA SMITH, PATRICIA 835-3429 PIKE VIEW 108 E 14TH FOOD SERVICE WORKER 323 N. CHERRY FOOD SERVICE WORKER A. 2905 SALLISAW DR SECOND YEAR SMITH, PATRICIA M. 771-0847 5701 WALNUT SEVENTH STREET KINDERGARTEN SMITH, PEGGY A. 835-3036 PIKE VIEW SMITH, SHEILA A. 6315 NAVAJO TRAIL FOURTH YEAR 1004 CHEPSTOW LANE NORTHEAST PHYSICAL EDUCATION SMITH, SHERYLL D. 851-4896 RT. 9, BOX 217 GLENVIEW FOURTH/FIFTH YEARS SMITH, VIRGINIA L. 753-2439 203 SHAMROCK ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-DIRECTOR 57 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR I, ATHLETICS 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION SNEED, BETTY M. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY 329-9230 31 KENSINGTON DRIVE CONWAY AR OLE MAIN AMERICAN HISTORY, WORLD HISTORY A. ZIP 72032 SNIDER, MARGIE 835-7507 LAKEWOODJ R SNIDER, MARILYN 758-6829 40 JACKSON OAKS PHYSICAL SCIENCE D. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 1604 W. 55TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 INDIAN HILLS KINDERGARTEN SNOWDEN, DANA K. 666-7196 2420 RIVERFRONT #166 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 BOONE PARK VICE PRINCIPAL SOURS, LAURA B. 4408 ROGERS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM CROSSING GUARD SOUTHERLAND, DORIS J. 945-7299 4126 BAUCUM NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PARK HILL CUSTODIAN SPENCER, DEBORAH M. 821-2316 23701 KANIS RD LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 ADMN. OFFICE PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINER SPRADLIN, ROY H. 565-3211 5318A SOUTHBORO CT LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 OLE MAIN ALG.II/TRIG., COMP.SCI/FROG SPRUIELL, EUVELLE 378-0814 1417 W. 12TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 AMBOY CUSTODIAN STACEY, QUINZELLA 945-0779 101 HEMLOCK CT. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 REDWOOD LUNCH PERIOD AIDE STAFFORD, KIMBERLY S. 771-2854 917 NICOLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SEVENTH STREET FIRST YEAR STAGGS, NOVA N. 835-9191 7817 OAKRIDGE SHERWOOD AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR OF LANGUAGE ARTS STANDLEY, MILDRED M. 851-2549 22 SUNSET TRAIL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 OLE MAIN ENGLISH III, IV STARK, BARBARA J. 834-4425 #7 GREER RD. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MEADOW PARK BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT AIDE STARK, HAROLD D 753-4374 1701 SKYLINE DRIVE #214 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST COORDINATED CAREER EDUCATION STEADMAN, VICKI L. 758-5774 1517 CRESTWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTH HEIGHTS SECOND/THIRD YEAR STEPHENSON, NANCY J. 834-2046 8900 BROCKINGTON #84 SHERWOOD AR 72116 PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER 58 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT STEWART, CHARLOTTE R. 375-2031 f82 HEMLOCK STEWART, JOG. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 753-1674 904 SKYLINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR - MEDIA SERVICES STEWART, STEPHANIE L. 945-0516 6714 MEDFORD LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE WORKER STEWART, TAMMY R. 376-4177 1612 MAGNOLIA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PIKE VIEW CUSTODIAN STEWART, WALTER EUGENE 374-0024 5191/2 OLIVE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL CUSTODIAN STINSON, MARGARETE. 376-2573 1316 NANNETTE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK SECRETARY STOKES, PHYLLIS B. 758-9630 5704 SORENSON, APT. C NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY,SPECIAL EDUCATION STOLL, SANDRA S. 771-0577 3404 BUNKER HILL NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS THIRD YEAR STONE, GEORGIA ANN 835-5277 2201 SEMINOLE TRAIL ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY STORY, ARCLISTA J. 666-1059 6218 BRENTWOOD ROSE CITY ELEM SIXTH YEAR STOUT, JACQUELYNE Y. 372-3872 1008 E. 6TH ST OLE MAIN FOOD SERVICE WORKER STOVALL, PAUL B. 771-4895 4908 STRATFORD SPVR. TRANSPORTATION STRAWN, JEAN M. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 945-3687 100 GARNER RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 INDIAN HILLS ORTHOPEDICALLY HANDICAPPED AIDE STRINGHAM, CORALIE B. 753-0159 4 ROUND HILL RD. 26756 72116 PARK HILL FOURTH/FIFTH YEAR SULLIVAN, BRENDAL. 771-0294 6616 ALLWOOD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTHEAST ALGEBRA II, PRE-CALCULUS SULLIVAN, LINDA L. 376-0675 924 E. WASHINGTON NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE WORKER SUMLER, JACQUELINE W. 796-8503 RT. 2, BOX 253S VILONIA AR 72173 BARING CROSS OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST *30/48 59 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT SWEEDEN, PATRICIA E. 664-3976 818 NORTH FILLMORE GLENVIEW THIRD YEAR SWITZER, 771-2783 CRESTWOOD NANNIE SWITZER, NANNIE 771-2783 CRESTWOOD TABOR, SUSAN 4924 CANDLEWICK CROSSING GUARD R. 4924 CANDLEWICK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 753-2922 4005 BUNKER HILL SEVENTH STREET SIXTH YEAR TACKETT, DANA L. CITY ZIP LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 223-8840 9102 BAILEY RD LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 LAKEWOODJ R EARTH SCIENCE,VOLLEYBALL/TRACK COACH TALLEY, ALLAM. 376-4348 OLE MAIN TALLEY, JOHNNY 664-6173 NORTHEAST TATE, JOHN P. 758-9751 CENTRAL TAYLOR, CHESTER 1523 W 15TH FOOD SERVICE WORKER JR. 5 HUGHES CT HEAD TRACK COACH, SAC 2109 ORANGE SCIENCE 945-0425 110 EMILY ST. BUS DRIVER TAYLOR, DOROTHY A. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 758-8381 609 PAULA DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NORTH HEIGHTS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE TAYLOR, EARNESTINE 945-0425 207 1/2 EMILY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER TAYLOR, ELLA L. 945-9266 4609 BOYER NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ROSE CITY ELEM FOOD SERVICE HEAD WORKER TAYLOR, EVELYN Y. 375-6837 609 HICKORY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER TAYLOR, GWENDOLYNF . 771-4001 2502 S. BERKLEY DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BUS DRIVER TAYLOR, MARY C. 758-2335 4524 PURNELL DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 RIDGEROAD GUIDANCE COUNSELOR TEAGUE, JENNIFER L. 834-4227 8404 EASY ST. SHERWOOD AR 72116 RIDGEROAD MATH B, GEN MATH, PRE ALGEBRA TERRY, JOYCE M. 758-9176 701 W. 18TH, APT. 47 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PARK HILL LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 60 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION THIBAULT, BETTY 753-8317 PIKE VIEW THOMAS, BRYAN K. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT JO 400 LATONA LANE SECRETARY 945-1650 4501 HAYWOOD ROSE CITY JR BAND DIRECTOR, SAC THOMAS, EARNESTINE G. CITY 758-2488 431 MCCAIN RDCREST S-21 INDIAN HILLS FOOD SERVICE WORKER THOMAS, LORETTA C. 835-8965 601 PEMBROKE NORTH HEIGHTS FIRST/SECOND YEAR THOMAS, MARY DEE 988-5028 RT. 2, BOX 333C OLE MAIN OCC BIOLOGY, RESOURCE THOMAS, PHYLLIS R. 753-0555 1105 W. 36TH ST. NORTHEAST THOMPSON, DONNA 490-1379 FOOD SERVICE WORKER J. 26 PLANTATION DR. ROSE CITY JR FOOD SERVICE WORKER THOMPSON, EDWARD 376-9403 1811 MARSHALL GLENVIEW CUSTODIAN THOMPSON, GEORGE E. 327-1658 1926 SCOTT ST OLE MAIN ELECTRONICS I, II THOMPSON, GREGORY J. 834-4829 1412 CORNFLOWER NORTHEAST PRINCIPAL THOMPSON, MARTHA R. 821-3379 1801 MAIN CENTRAL ENGLISH THOMPSON, MARY NELL 835-2360 2608 SEMINOLE TRAIL NORTHEAST GUIDANCE SECRETARY THOMPSON, SANDRA GALE 834-5134 7420 TOLTEC AMBOY FOURTH YEAR THOMPSON, THEO 663-1655 1922 JOHNSON CRESTWOOD CUSTODIAN THORNE, BILLIE J. 753-1933 4310 SYCAMORE NORTH HEIGHTS CROSSING GUARD THORNE, BILLIE JEAN 753-1933 4310 SYCAMORE NORTH HEIGHTS LUNCH PERIOD AIDE THORNTON, MARY K. 945-5553 6516 MEDFORD LN MEADOWP ARK LUNCH PERIOD AIDE 61 ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 SHERWOOD AR 72116 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 CONWAY AR 72032 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT THORNTON, MARY K. MEADOWP ARK THORNTON, NANCY 758-0493 INDIAN HILLS THRASHER, TERRY 397-5583 ARGENTA TIDMORE, JEROME 663-3504 ROSE CITY JR TILLER, LISA A. 834-8589 6516 MEDFORD CROSSING GUARD L. 5116 ARLINGTON SECOND YEAR E. 26425 HENSLEY LOOP CUSTODIAN K. 2604 FAIR PARK MATH 8, PRE-ALGEBRA 8209 TALL OAKS NORTHEAST COMM, SPEECH I TILLEY, CAROL A. 758-1198 4618 MARION RIDGEROAD FOOD SERVICE WORKER TINSLEY, FLORENCE JANE 758-6882 5502 GREEN VALLEY CENTRAL HEALTH TIPTON, JEAN CITY 945-0405 3507 E. WASHINGTON #48 SEVENTH STREET SECRETARY TOLIVER, BETTY MAE 945-1504 #1 GOODWIN CIRCLE BUS DRIVER TOLIVER, KARON L. 771-6175 806 BUTTERCUP PIKE VIEW CUSTODIAN TONEY, CONNIE M. 562-1124 5612 OLD HICKORY RD ROSE CITY JR ENGLISH 8, ENGLISH I TOOMBS CAROL A. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 HENSLEY AR 72065 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 SHERWOODA R 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72ll8 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72ll4 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72ll 7 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 771-0988 P.O. BOX 1492 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72115 OLE MAIN RESOURCE BIOLOGY, DUE PROCESS TUCKER, ARTHUR 224-7289 1705 JR. DEPUTY ROAD LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 RIDGEROAD PRINCIPAL TUCKER, BETTY J. 834-4703 109 REDWING JACKSONVILLE AR LAKEWOODJR MEDIA/GUIDANCE CLERK, COMPUTERL AB AIDE TUCKER, JAMES M. 834-5061 109 KING PINE RD SHERWOODA R NORTHEAST RES HISTORY,BASKETBALL COACH,OCC ENGLISH TUCKER, TAMMY 834-5061 NORTHEAST TUCKER, WILLIE M. 109 KING PINE RD BIOLOGY, CHEERLEADERS TROY SHERWOODA R 72076 72116 72116 945-9311 8000 EAST 46TH ASSISTANT MECHANIC NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 62 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT TURNER, ANTHONY R. 945-6030 120 BUCKEYE BELWOOD CUSTODIAN TURNER, L.C. JR 834-1040 WAREHOUSE TURNER, LONNIE 961-9706 WAREHOUSE TURNER, MARY F. 8615 NORTHGATE DR MAINTENANCE HELPER D. RT 1, BOX 242 GENERAL LABOR 834-1040 8615 NORTHGATE SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I AIDE (35) TURNER, PATSY J. 376-1735 1111 E. 11TH ST PINE LUNCH PERIOD AIDE TURPIN, PA!vlALA ANN 224-2225 11222 KANIS LAKEWOODJ R MATH SE, RESOURCE TWEEDLE, KATHERINE 778-6932 1811 CHITWOOD CITY ROSE CITY ELEM ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL TYNE, BARBARA J. 835-1823 104 FORK RIVER RD PARK HILL SIXTH YEAR UEKMAN, LAVERNE P. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SHERWOOD AR 72120 SCOTT AR 72142 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LITTLE ROCK AR 72211 BENTON AR 72015 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 753-4052 801 W. 44TH ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CAFE. OFFICE FOOD SERVICE WORKER-SUBSTITUTE UNDERWOOD, LYNNE R. 945-5521 115 MEADOWP ARK LAKEWOODE LEM LUNCH PERIOD AIDE VANPELT, MAUDIE E. 945-1797 116 WALTON CR BARING CROSS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE VEASLEY, JOHN L. 375-1030 604 EAST 16TH APT. A BUS DRIVER VEATCH, JAMES C. 372-2640 2216 S. MAIN BUS DRIVER VERDELL, PHYLLIS G. 834-8985 #14 JOHNNY LANE BARING CROSS TEACHER AIDE VINCENT, WARREN 945-2048 NORTHEAST VINCENT, WILLIE 945-2048 OLE MAIN VINSON, JANET R. 5008 GLENVIEW CUSTODIAN H. 5008 GLENVIEW GRAPHIC ART 753-6967 5316 CHANDLER RIDGEROAD SECRETARY BLDG. I, II 63 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 SHERWOOD AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY ZIP LOCATION ASSIGNMENT WAGLEY, BILLY J. JR. 945-6904 2100 EUREKA GDN RD NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NORTHEAST BAND, STUDY HALL, FINE ARTS WALKER, BARBARA N. 753-8986 4424 CENTRAL DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2118 LYNCH DRIVE CHAPTER I AIDE WALKER, ELDORIS 835-6587 RT 4, BOX 270 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 INDIAN HILLS THIRD YEAR WALKER, JESS G. 835-7498 20 PATTY LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE COORDINATOR OF MATHEMATICS WALKER, JILL ANNETTE 771-4759 3690 J MCCAIN PARK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ROSE CITY ELEM SECOND YEAR WALKER, JONI L. 753-3822 524 GREEN OAK DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 LYNCH DRIVE KINDERGARTEN WALKER, SARA RUTH 835-7498 20 PATTY LANE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 7 2116 INDIAN HILLS FIRST YEAR WALLACE, DAVID J. 753-4942 708 VALERIE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LAKEWOOD JR BASKETBALL COACH, HEALTH WALLACE, FLOYD E. 945-9568 P.O. BOX 9012 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72119 BUS DRIVER WALLACE, JUDY JO 835-8091 24 SHEILA DR. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY THIRD YEAR WALLER, JOHN c. JR. 374-8817 717 N. VINE ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER WALLER, LORI 375-9733 813 N. MAPLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL COMPUTER LAB AIDE WALLER, OTEVEE 374-8817 717 N. VINE NO LITT-LE ROCK, A 72114 LAKEWOOD JR BEHAVIORAL ADJUSTMENT WALLER, TEDRELL D. 374-8817 717 NORTH VINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER WALTERS, MARK A. 758-4638 2401 LAKEVIEW APT 3 BLDGI NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 OLE MAIN BAND WALTON, HELEN M. 945-2249 130 BURFORD ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 LAKEWOOD ELEM FOOD SERVICE WORKER WAMSLEY, MONA LEE 835-9264 6003 S. WOODVIEW DR SHERWOOD AR 72116 BUS DRIVER 64 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION WARD, DOYNE R. ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 835-5718 6508 OSAGE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE DIRECTOR OF PURCHASING WARD, JOSEPHS. 771-1779 NORTHEAST 3900 MCCAIN PARK #149 B-8 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 GERMAN I, II WARD, KIMBERLEY A. 501 NAPA VALLEY RD. #403 LITTLE ROCK AR LYNCH DRIVE SECOND/THIRD YEAR WARD, KIMBERLY J. 568-7150 35 ROSEMONT LITTLE ROCK AR ROSE CITY JR PHYS SCIENCE, EARTH SCIENCE, IMPACT WARD, MILDRED B. 72211 72204 753-5034 2705 DONAGHEY NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST ENG IV, CRTV. WRTNG., ENG. IV CB, ENG IV B WARD, SHIRLEY A. 758-2155 2007 BROKEN ARROW DR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ROSE CITY JR TEACHER AIDE WARD, STEPHEN 778-3616 WAREHOUSE WARD, VANESSA L. 109 3RD. ROOFER 223-9336 801 S RODNEY PARHAM 3-C LAKEWOODE LEM WARD, VIRGINIA M. 565-4925 5701 DREHER LN, APT. 51 ROSE CITY JR RESOURCE WARE, AMANDAA BBOTT BENTON AR 72015 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 834-1216 122 WHITEWOOD SHERWOODA R 72116 INDIAN HILLS GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE WARE, EULETA J. 945-4063 4813 IRA NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 ARGENTA KINDERGARTEN WARE, EVA M. 945-4662 P.O. BOX 3537 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 BUS DRIVER WARNER, CATHERINE W. 666-9391 2007 NORTH ARTHUR LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 AMBOY WARREN, CAROLYN L. 758-8221 417 W 24TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ROSE CITY JR HOME EC 8-9, CAREER ORIENTATION WARREN, JANET RAE 753-5635 620 SKYLINE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 AMBOY KINDERGARTEN/FIRST YEAR WARREN, SHEDRICK JR. 758-8221 417 W 24TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CENTRAL ASST. PRINCIPAL WASHBURN, MABEL O. 758-7353 17 CLIFFWOOD CR NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 BARING CROSS SECRETARY 65 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION WASSON, DOYALENE ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT CITY ZIP 758-3460 32 SIERRA CT. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY-DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION WATKINS, PEGGY 374-5138 1607 W. 16TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 BUS DRIVER WATSON, ESTHER M. 1318 VAN ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PIKE VIEW FIRST YEAR WATSON, FREDALE J. 568-2309 8223 SCOTT HAMILTON E-13 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 BOONE PARK FOOD SERVICE WORKER WATSON, GRETCHEN B. 753-7810 4517 AUSTIN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST INT. ALGEBRA, TRIG./A. MATH WATSON, MILDRED 753-8598 2410 WILSHIRE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY, ASST. SUPT.-BUSINESS AFFAIFS WATTS, ROY KATHERYN 372-2855 #18 DETROIT LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 RIDGEROAD ENGLISH 8 WAYNE, PAMELA M. 372-0027 321 ELM ROSE CITY JR WEBB, LIND.E.R K. B.A. AIDE CENTRAL RT . 2 , BOX 3 2 5 P CUSTODIAN WEBB, ROBERT J. RT. 2, BOX 325P CENTRAL HEAD CUSTODIAN WEEKS, EVELYN D. 375-2684 1424 NANNETTE CENTRAL FOOD SERVICE WORKER WEGHORST, MADELINE L. 771-1685 1608 CIRCLEDALE RD INDIAN HILLS MR/LD RESOURCE WELCH, B. DEANNA 835-1343 7225 GERONIMO PARK HILL KINDERGARTEN WELLS, MARIANNE 758-5187 4801 HAMPTON RD. MEADOW PARK KINDERGARTEN WENZEL, ELENORA 835-2925 511 E DEVON NORTHEAST FOOD SERVICE WORKER WESTERMAN, REBECCA S. 851-4173 6 NIMROD COVE PIKE VIEW KINDERGARTEN WETHERINGTON, EMOGENE F. 758-1074 5500 WALNUT OLE MAIN ENGLISH III, STUDY HALL 66 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 MAUMELLE AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT WHALEN, YVONNE W. 758-0718 4511 HAZELWOOD RIDGEROAD AMERICAN HISTORY WHITE, BILLIE 753-7088 LAKEWOODJ R WHITE, DANA 0. 835-0627 BARING CROSS WHITE, MICHAEL JO 4100 MONTICELLO DR MEDIA SPECIALIST 911 E WOODRUFF SELF CONTAINED MR c. CITY ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 753-2817 OLE MAIN 2123 N MAPLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 CHOR.MUSIC, CONCRT CHOIR, voe JAZZ, BA WHITE, NANCY J. 835-8846 5817 NORTH HILLS NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS MEDIA SPECIALIST WHITE, WILMA J. 374-2440 1002 E. 11TH NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 PINE SELF-CONTAINED MR AIDE WHITEHEAD, JACQUI P. 771-4650 5021 OAKLAWN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 PIKE VIEW FOURTH YEAR WHITEHURST, DEBORAH P. 758-4438 4013 MAPLE NO LITTLE ROCK, A 72118 BOONE PARK FIFTH/SIXTH YEARS WHITESIDE, CAROLYN R. 758-8646 25 EMERALD CIRCLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 PIKE VIEW KINDERGARTEN WHITNEY, KAYE M. 835-7893 44 SHOSHONI DR ADMN. OFFICE SECRETARY WHITTEN, WILLIAM H. 663-3931 114 MAPLE BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY COUNSELOR WIGGINS, PHYLLIS A. 758-5302 4512 CRESTLINE DR OLE MAIN GEOMETRY, ALG., PASCAL WIGGS, JACKIE L. 758-7777 3806 N. MAPLE CRESTWOOD THIRD YEAR WILKERSON, MICHAELE. 834-4434 8703 INDIANHEAD LAKEWOODE LEM SIXTH YEAR WILKINS, LOLETHA M. 374-9140 2700 STATE ST. PINE SELF CONTAINED MR WILKINS, SHIELA K. 127 JOINER CRESTWOOD FOOD SERVICE WORKER WILKINSON, CHRISTINA L. 843-2746 i30 FAIRWAY DR BOONE PARK CHAPTER I AIDE 67 SHERWOODA R 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72205 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 SHERWOODA R 72116 LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 JACKSONVILLE AR 72076 CABOT AR 72023 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION WILLARD, MARTHA ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 758-5338 5206 SYCAMORE NORTH HEIGHTS CHAPTER I AIDE WILLBANKS, MICHAEL ALLEN 329-7532 2104 BROADVIEW CENTRAL ASST. PRINICPAL WILLIAMS, ANTHONY D. 945-5994 2305 AMBERLY DR. LYNCH DRIVE CUSTODIAN WILLIAMS, BENNIE 945-6018 1003 DST. DIXIE ADD. CITY CAFE. OFFICE WAREHOUSE WORKER, FOOD WILLIAMS, BERNICE P. 945-7403 926 'G' ST SEVENTH STREET CUSTODIAN WILLIAMS, BETTYE M. ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 CONWAY AR 72032 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 SERVICES NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 224-7063 3401 DORSET DRIVE LITTLE ROCK AR 72204 NORTHEAST HOME ECONOMICS I, II ,HOUS./CLOTH. CH DVLP/HOUS WILLIAMS, DOROTHY J. 945-0696 1825 BEN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 OLE MAIN ENGLISH II WILLIAMS, DOROTHY M. 945-5827 2616 LANSBROOK LN NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 SKILLS CENTER SELF CONTAINED AIDE WILLIAMS, JULIE ANN 834-5171 #1 SHELBY RD #603 SHERWOOD AR 72116 ROSE CITY JR MEDIA/GUIDANCE CLERK WILLIAMS, LUCY J. 945-7895 RT. 1, #10 TOLOBORT LOOP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 WILLIAMS, NORMA K. 374-8625 712 PINE STREET NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 LAKEWOODJ R WILLIAMS, PAMELA S. 945-1189 5200 S. WOODLAND NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 PARK HILL FOOD SERVICE WORKER WILLIAMS, SHARON JO 225-5557 2507 GUNPOWDER LITTLE ROCK AR 72207 ADMN. OFFICE DRUG/ALCHOL FACILITATOR WILLIAMS, THERESA L. 834-8276 8815 WOODBINE #502 SHERWOOD AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE BOOKKEEPER WILLIAMS, THOMAS L. 2712 E. 2ND ST. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN WILLIAMS, TONYA L. 375-2837 917 CAMPUS ST NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 ADMN. OFFICE PRODUCTION CLERK WILLIS, LINDA K. 834-2205 2404 SEMINOLE NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS OFFICE/MEDIA CLERK 68 NAME TELEPHONE LOCATION ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT 908 W 52ND ST CITY WILSON, GARY L. 753-4795 RIDGEROAD WILSON, LINDA 771-1951 CRESTWOOD WILSON, MAVIS ART, G/T FACILITATOR 455-2900 MEADOWP ARK WILSON, RANDY 834-6236 WAREHOUSE H. v. o. WILSON, VIVAL J. 5708 DUBLIN PRINCIPAL 16114 OTTER CREEK PKWAY BEHAVIOR ADJUSTMENT 8900 BROCKINGTON, LOT 31 MAINTENANCE HELPER 676-5406 RT. 3, BOX 39 MEADOWP ARK FOOD SERVICE WORKER WIMBERLY, GERALD 758-7948 600 1/2 W. 22ND ST. OLE MAIN CUSTODIAN WIRGES, ELIZABETH 372-3628 1215 DIVISION CAFE. OFFICE SECRETARY WIRGES, MARK J. 372-3628 1215 DIVISION WAREHOUSE HEATING \u0026amp; AC MAINT ZIP NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72118 LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 SHERWOOD AR 72116 LONOKE AR 72086 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 WISE, EUGENE E. 835-3689 1909 PONDEROSA CT NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 ADMN. OFFICE SUPERVISOR, VOCATIONAL EDCCATION WISE, LINDA G. 945-0158 6620 PIONEER SEVENTH STREET CHAPTER I AIDE WISE, NANCY 758-8463 1714 W 19TH ROSE CITY ELEM SECRETARY WISE, WILLIE B. NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72117 NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72114 376-1227 2301 IZARD LITTLE ROCK AR 72206 OLE MAIN ADMINSTRATIVE ASSISTANT WISEMAN, GINNY L. 834-0929 1211 SILVER CREEK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 NORTHEAST ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL WITCHER, MARY R. 835-0009 2013 CEDAR CREEK NO LITTLE ROCK AR 72116 INDIAN HILLS OR\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_667","title":"Principal selection process","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","School principals","Parents"],"dcterms_title":["Principal selection process"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/667"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["70 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District July 25, 1989 TO\nFROM: Mr. Gene Reville, Metropolitan Supervisor Angela Sewall, Associate Supt. for School Improvement THROUGH: (^3^Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent of Schools RE: PRINCIPAL SELECTION I. Vacating The Incentive Schools Although the recommendations of Special Master McCutcheon matched those of the school district in terms of vacating all incentive school positions for 1989-90\nthe absence of a court approval of those recommendations caused serious concern on the part of district administrators. It was the concensus of the staff that vacating teacher positions during the summer without prior explanation and without knowledge of their availability for application, interviews etc. would be counterproductive. It was also proposed by the district that regional/national interviews be done for \u0026lt; these positions. Achievement of this objective would be difficult, if not impossible, during the summer as the pool of persons who would be likely applicants may not receive information relative to available positions. Consequently, a recommendation was made through James Jennings to you to vacate only principal positions. Approval was given. Principal positions at the Incentive Schools were vacated after a meeting was held to inform them of the process. II. Advertised Positions Vacated positions and the principalship at the new Washington School were advertised within the contract- directed 15 day period. Regional advertising took place as well and included: Memphis, Tenn Dallas, TX Tulsa, OK Fort Smith, AR Ft. Worth, TX Oklahoma City, OK Arkadelphia, AR All Arkansas Colleges and Universities 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361III. Interview Persons Interviews were set to be held immediately after the application deadline as beginning July 5, 1989. It was the intent of the District administration as expressed in the Desegregation plan (and as has been practiced on occasion in the past) to involve the patrons and staff of in the inter- view process. involved in the interviews: Accordingly, the following persons were Administrative Team on Each Committee James Jennings Rachel Myers Richard Maple Associate Supt. - Desegregation Assistant Supt. Director - Human Resources Stephens School BCC: Mamie Wilkins PTA: Wanda Jones BI-R: Doretha Grimes Rev. A. Louis Vaughn Garland School BCC: Chris Gonterman PTA: Sandra Love BI-R: Kay Jordan Rightsell School BCC: Sue M. Palmer-Walker PTA: Evelyn Layne BI-R: Ann West Rockefeller School BCC: EC: Coreen Frazier Willie Fisher BI-R: Hafeeza Majeed PTA: Louis Trice Ish School BCC: PTA: Beverly Hines Robin Collins BI-R: Juanita Washington Washington School B. J. McCoy Joyce Meeks Doris Robinson GardnerPrior to every interview, Mr. Richard Maple, Director of Human Resources, explained that parental and staff input was earnestly sought and was valued. He then explained, however, that these recommendations might not represent the final decision which would be made by the District administration. Upon completion of this interview process, Mr. Maple tallied the results and presented them to the executive staff for review. These are attached. The administrative staff considered each and every recommendation carefully. Predicated on this review, and after consulting with the Superintendent, several persons were called back for further interviews with the staff and then with the Superintendent and Deputy Superintendent. Predicated on all of this input, review of records and of needs within the District as well as at the specific schools, recommendations were made for principalships and candidates were so notified. Subsequently, patrons and staff from Dunbar Jr. High, Cloverdale Elementary, and Washington Elementary were invited to \"meet the principal. II to build a collaborative vision of the school and its needs and goals. It is to be noted that in the preponderance of situations, the committees' recommendations and those of the parent/staff interview team do coincide, follows: Selection of principals are as 1. WASHINGTON - Bobbie Goodwin Ms. Goodwin is returning from medical leave as a principal. In my judgment, she will do a very good job at Washington. The parent committee functioned here the same as it did in the other schools, but in surveying all the candidates, my opinion - as I stated to you - is that Ms. Goodwin should be the principal. Karen Buchanan, the parents' first choice. has spent only one year at Brady and should return there where she has good parent support and has made good progress in developing a more cohesive, productive staff than existed previously. 2. ISH - Lonnie Dean Ms. Dean was the parents' first choice. 3. STEPHENS - Stan Strauss Mr. Strauss is presently the principal at Stephens and was the first choice of two of the four parents and the second choice of the other two. He has provided good leadership in a whole language approach to reading at his school. 4. MITCHELL - Donita Hudspeth Ms. Hudspeth was the parents' first choice.5. ROCKEFELLER - Ann Mangan Ms. Mangan will be provided assistance from Lillie Carter in the assistant principal's role to assist with the development of the Early Childhood unit. 6. RIGHTSELL - Kay Loss Ms. Loss was the parents' first choice. 7. GARLAND - Cheryl Simmons Ms. Simmons was everyone's first choice.APPLICANTS Karen Buchanan Eleanor Cox Lonnie Dean Bettv Mosby Billy Whitmire Barbara Davis Jeff Carr INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR p: u \u0026gt; OS u H 2 co oo c rd c c co cu I 33 29 21 23 16 13 0 Principal - Washington j-i 0) w rd O Q p Q 33 20 21 0 0 0 0 o CJ CQ eg, I co cu CJ o co 0) 0) x: o co PS \u0026lt;u Ct X) I Pd 40 28 40 21 10 11 15 0 - Not Present for Interview 0 - Did Not Rank 0 0 0 23 21 23 0 32 29 25 28 13 0 16 36 36 34 0 0 0 0 34 32 32 19 0~ 0 0 208 174 173 114 59 43 31 34.6 29.0 28.8 22.8 14.7 8.6 6.2APPLICANTS Lonnie Dean Eleanor Cox Angelo Coppola Franklin Davis INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR Principal - Ish Cd H p: Cd M \u0026gt; 05 Cd H 2 co tu C H a p 0) \u0026gt; \u0026lt;u aa 33 31 16 20 to c o o c o Pi c o PC c cd co p OJ S c co  \u0026lt;u s \u0026lt;u Cb x) 'g 35 33 26 17 36 25 18 19 37 38 27 25 35 35 24 12 176 162 111 93 35.2 32.4 22.20 18.6APPLICANTS Stan Strauss Eleanor Cox INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR a: 3s UJ \u0026gt; OS LU H 2 V) 0) E H o \u0026lt;u s w 0) c o co XI C CO c H H \u0026lt;u rd I tzj tu s (U -6 PS QJ \u0026amp; :S H co  O hJ PS 38 38 24 31 37 31 36 32 35 37 29 Ellean Cleveland Bill Smith 27 30 Principal - Stephens 199 205 33.1 34.1 22 26 22 24 20 30 20 25 35 26 146 161 24.3 26.8APPLICANTS blary Burrough Donita Hudspeth Bill Smith Deborah F-lcAfee INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR Cd H S Cd M \u0026gt; b\nCd H 2 l-l C3 o B o 5 17 36 24 16 Principal - Mitchell co 5 o o s 27 36 29 29 Q) ts nJ I 17 38 29 20 \u0026lt;U 0) O ta cd 0 36 n 15 \u0026lt;u T) m X o Cd 23 31 23 23 84 177 135 103 21.0 35.4 26.4 20.0 0 - Not Present for Interview iAPPLICANTS Eleanor Cox Angelo Coppola Ann Mangan, INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR Principal - Rockefeller c td H 3 UJ n \u0026gt; CS bJ E- 2 p cu co txj rd 43 ~i^ 28 0) N \u0026lt;0 (ju C \u0026lt;u (U O o 39 44 (U N 0) \u0026lt;U \u0026lt;4-1 CO 17 8 7 0) o rd w a .3 35 30 36 co CU 0) 'o CCJ 37 30 30 cu :S 'S I H 21 26 36 208 164 181 34.6 21.2, 30.1 1APPLICANTS Kay Loss riary Burroughs Cynthia McGrew Diane Rynders INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR \u0026lt;3\nH 3: U} M \u0026gt; 05 S 0) a w p 0) 13 I w CP QJ  CO CO C w Q) 'O CO OJ (X .s o H 05 Principal - Rightsell 22. 21 15 24 la. 15 14 39 12 24 34 16. 16 33 35 23 11 26 161 97 81 119 32.2 19.4 16.2 23.8APPLICANTS Lillie Carter Cheryl Simmons Ellean Cleveland Ri 11 Smi th INTERVIEW TALLY FORM FOR Principal - Garland ui S U] w \u0026gt; DC w 2 q I QJ C O o w H 6 Q nJ X) q co tZ)  co XI q CO \u0026lt;U OJ X o co pd CU a \"S co x cj 21 IQ IZ 28 25. 3a. 21 33 21 ZQ 21 31 30 26 131 26.20 32 23 11 21 20 26 184 111 151 36.8 22.20 30.20Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 Date: May 5, 1994 To: Hank Williams From: n Brown Subject: Information on potential principal moves Yesterday, I asked Polly Ramer to contact you for a list of the principal changes you are contemplating. I realize both the tentative and sensitive nature of this information, so I assure you that I will neither release nor discuss the names on your list until such time as you make them public yourself. Im weary of the rumors and will appreciate having solid information from you. Thanks very much. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JUL 1 9 1994 May 26, 1994 Office of Desefirejaiion Mofstoffng TO: FROM: Forest Height Jr. High School Principal Interview .Committee Members Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent SUBJECT: Principal Interviews Thank you for accepting our invitation to participate in the selection process for the principal of Forest Heights Jr. High School for the 1994-95 school year. The interviews will be held in the Little Rock School District Board Room, 810 West Markham Street, on June 8, 1994, from 1 to 4 p.m. Your assistance and cooperation are appreciated.Magnet Review Committee Questions 1. What is your understanding of the process used by the LRSD to select principals for the original magnet schools? 2. In a June 27, 1994 letter to the court, the MRC concluded that \"LRSD has followed the staff selection process according to the procedures previously presented to the MRC with reference to original magnet school principal positions. This included the opportunity for parental involvement.\" Did the LRSD convey these staff selection procedures to the MRC in writing? Describe the process used by the MRC to determine that the LRSD has followed \"previously presented\" staffing procedures. On what basis did the MRC conclude that the LRSD had provided the opportunity for parental involvement? 3. Specifically, what action will the MRC take to ensure that the LRSD consults it on staffing issues in the original magnet schools? 4. The courts November 5,1992 order states that \"In the future, the LRSD must consult the MRC and must seek Court permission prior to making any staffing changes in the magnet schools.\" \u0026amp; What do you interpret \"consult the MRC\" to mean in practice?Magnet Review Committee Questions 1. What is your understanding of the process used by the LRSD to select principals for the original magnet schools? 2. In a June 27,1994 letter to the court, the MRC concluded that \"LRSD has followed the staff selection process according to the procedures previously presented to the MRC with reference to original magnet school principal positions. This included the opportunity for parental involvement.\" Did the LRSD convey these staff selection procedures to the MRC in writing? Describe the process used by the MRC to determine that the LRSD has followed \"previously presented\" staffing procedures. On what basis did the MRC conclude that the LRSD had provided the opportunity for parental involvement? 3. Specifically, what action will the MRC take to ensure that the LRSD consults if on staffing issues in the original magnet schools? 4. The courts November 5, 1992 order states that 'In the future, the LRSD must consult the MRC and must seek Court permission prior to making any staffing changes in the magnet schools.\"Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 June 30, 1994 Hand Delivered Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 801 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Hank: As you know, during this weeks budget hearings judge Wright directed ODM to look into the process the district used to fill principal positions. She asked us to pay particular attention to the role parents and the Magnet Review Committee played in that selection process. We will use our customary monitoring procedures, that is, reviewing documentation and interviewing various individuals. Also, before we file our report with the Court, we will give you and others who furnish us information an opportunity to review our findings. In order to proceed with our monitoring, we need certain documents and other information from the district. Please forward the information on e attached list by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994. Thank you for your assistance. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours. Ann S. Brown Enc. Provide the following information to ODM by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. A list of all LRSD schools which had principal vacancies for the 1994-95 school year. A list of those schools whose principal was hired in consultation with an interview committee, and a list of those schools whose principal was hired without consultation with an interview committee. The list of interview committee members, and any observers of the interview process, for each school. Each list is to name all parents, teachers, and administrators who served on the committee and include their race, gender, phone number, and address. Also indicate the position and grade level taught (where applicable) of school staff, title of  administrators, and the home school district of parents. Copy of written criteria used to select interview team members (teachers, parents, administrators, or others). Copy of written communications or instructions given to the interview team. (If no written communications exist, please document and date any verbal communications or instructions). Copy of LRSD policies and procedures for hiring principals. job description(s) for each principal (magnet, incentive, area, secondary). Job posting for each principal opening. Copy of criteria used to screen applicants for each principals position prior to interviews\ninclude name of person(s) responsible for the screening. Copies of any patron letters to LRSD officials regarding the hiring process. Summary of the timeframe within which the process took place (include dates of job postings, application deadlines, interview dates, and the like). For those vacancies filled with the assistance of an interview committee, provide the names of the applicant pool presented to the committee, the top three choices of the committee, and the applicant recommended by the superintendent.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 June 30, 1994 Hand Delivered Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 801 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Hank: As you know, during this weeks budget hearings judge Wright directed ODM to look into the process the district used to fill principal positions. She asked us to pay particular attention to the role parents and the Magnet Review Committee played in that selection process. We will use our customary monitoring procedures, that is, reviewing documentation and interviewing various individuals. Also, before we file our report with the Court, we will give you and others who furnish us information an opportunity to review our findings. In order to proceed with our monitoring, we need certain documents and other information from the district. Please forward the information on the attached list by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994. Thank you for your assistance. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours. Ann S. Brown Enc. Provide the following information to ODM by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. A list of all LRSD schools which had principal vacancies for the 1994-95 school year. A list of those schools whose principal was hired in consultation with an interview committee, and a list of those schools whose principal was hired without consultation with an interview committee. The list of interview committee members, and any observers of the interview process, for each school. Each list is to name all parents, teachers, and administrators who served on the committee and include their race, gender, phone number, and address. Also indicate the position and grade level taught (where applicable) of school staff, title of ' administrators, and the home school district of parents. Copy of written criteria used to select interview team members (teachers, parents, administrators, or others). Copy of written communications or instructions given to the interview team. (If no written communications exist, please document and date any verbal communications or instructions). Copy of LRSD policies and procedures for hiring principals. job description(s) for each principal (magnet, incentive, area, secondary). job posting for each principal opening. Copy of criteria used to screen applicants for each principals position prior to interviews\ninclude name of person(s) responsible for the screening. Copies of any patron letters to LRSD officials regarding the hiring process. Summary of the timeframe within which the process took place (include dates of job postings, application deadlines, interview dates, and the like). For those vacancies filled with the assistance of an interview committee, provide the names of the applicant pool presented to the committee, the top three choices of the committee, and the applicant recommended by the superintendent.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 June 30, 1994 Hand Delivered Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 801 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Hank: As you know, during this weeks budget hearings judge Wright directed ODM to look into the process the district used to fill principal positions. She asked us to pay particular attention to the role parents and the Magnet Review Committee played in that selection process. We will use our customaiy monitoring procedures, that is, reviewing documentation and interviewing various individuals. Also, before we file our report with the Court, we will give you and others who furnish us information an opportunity to review our findings. In order to proceed with our monitoring, we need certain documents and other information from the district. Please forward the information on the attached list by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994. Thank you for your assistance. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours. Ann S. Brown Enc. Provide the following information to ODM by 5:00 p.m., July 7, 1994: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. A list of all LRSD schools which had principal vacancies for the 1994-95 school year. A list of those schools whose principal was hired in consultation with an interview committee, and a list of those schools whose principal was hired without consultation with an interview committee. The list of interview committee members, and any observers of the interview process, for each school. Each list is to name all parents, teachers, and administrators who served on the committee and include their race, gender, phone number, and address. Also indicate the position and grade level taught (where applicable) of school staff, title of -administrators, and the home school district of parents. Copy of written criteria used to select interview team members (teachers, parents, administrators, or others). Copy of written communications or instructions given to the interview team. (If no written communications exist, please document and date any verbal communications or instructions). Copy of LRSD policies and procedures for hiring principals. job description(s) for each principal (magnet, incentive, area, secondary). Job posting for each principal opening. Copy of criteria used to screen applicants for each principals position prior to interviews\ninclude name of person(s) responsible for the screening. Copies of any patron letters to LRSD officials regarding the hiring process. Summary of the timeframe within which the process took place (include dates of job postings, application deadlines, interview dates, and the like). For those vacancies filled with the assistance of an interview committee, provide the names of the applicant pool presented to the committee, the top three choices of the committee, and the applicant recommended by the superintendent.LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Kame DATA COLLECTION______________________________ Request info from LRSD on process Analyze response/material from LRSD________ Request clarlfication/addltional info fro TEAM INQUIRY______________________________ Develop team interview process Plan for Joshua Involvement Develop interview team questionnaire Approve interview team questionnaire Prepare master list of team members _____Make assignments for team calling______ Write initial call script________________ Write letter for team Interviews _____Make initial calls to team members Make master Interview list Mail team member letters Conduct team interviews Compile team interview information 7^ MRC INQUIRY Determine content of MRC letter Send letter to MRC on role Response back from MRC on role Schedule MRC member interviews Develop MRC member questionnaire Conduct MRC member interviews Compile MRC Interview results Prepare MRC role information ADMIN INQUIRY Develop admin inquiry process________ Schedule admin interviews Develop admin questionnaire Approve admin questionnaire__________ Conduct admin interviews Compile admin interview information FEEDBACK SESSION_________________________ Determine feedback session date/agenda Determine feedback participants Write feedback invitations Logistics for feedback session Mall feedback invitations _____Conduct feedback session_______________ _____Incorporate feedback changes_____________ REPORT PREPARATION Determine report Corraat Durati 12d Id 6d 6d 20d Id lid 5d Id 2d 2d Id 2d 3d 4d 3d 5d 8d 16d 2d 2d ______7^ 4d 6d 3d 7d 8d 16d 2d 7d 2d Id 6d lOd 13d Id ______W Id 12d Id Id 2d 22d lid Scheduled Start 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 __________6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/1/94 7/8/94 7/12/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 __________7Z14Z94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 7/19/94 7/27/94 7/27/94 7/26/94 __________7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 7/20/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 ____________8/1/94 8/1/94 _____________8/1/94 8/1/94 _____________8/1/94 _____________8/2/94 8/16/94 8/16/94 ___________7/20/94 7/20/94 Scheduled Finish 7/16/94 6/30/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 ___________7/27/94 6/30/94 7/14/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/15/94 7/18/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/27/94 ______________ T/15/94 7/22/94 7/21/94 7/26/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 8/4/94 ____________8/4/94 ____________ ____________1/22/3^ 7/19/94 7/20/94 1/29/9^ ___________8n7/?4 8/1/94 _____________8/1/94 8/1/94 ____________8/16/94 _____________B/2/94 8/16/94 8/17/94 ___________8/19/94 8/4/94 % Complete 64% 100% 0% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 0% 0% 0% ________05^ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% __________ 0% ___________0^ 0% 0% ___________0^ 0% ________0% 0% ___________0^ 0% __________q%_ __________M 0% 0% ________0% 0% Predecessor 2 2 6 6 8 6 10 9 9 13,11,12 14 14 16,14 17 20 21 21 22,21 24,23 25 22 2 29___ 29,3 31 30__ 33 36____ 37,36 36____ 38____ 39,40 41 18,34,26^27 Resource Initials HS MG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO AB PR PR AB MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB________ PR PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR,AB MG,MP,AB,BMOO AB AB RS, PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS HS,MG,MP__________ HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB AB__________________ H5,MG,MP__________ HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS HS____________ HS____________ PR____________ PR____________ HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB HS,AB,PR 3:42 pm Page 1 7/15/94 Qi^r\u0026gt;yrKit2x^ il)LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Nane Prepare report draft Edit report draft_______ Print report_____________ Print final report File report with Court OTHER_______________________________ Budget hearing preparations Budget hearings_____________________ ODM retreat Prepare for LRSD budget hearing Budget hearing______________________ Durati 5d 2d Id Id Od 20d 7d 3d 3d 7d Id Scheduled Start 8/4/94 8/12/94 8/15/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 8/1/94 8/3/94 8/12/94 Scheduled Finish 8/10/94 8/15/94 8/15/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 8/12/94 7/26/94 7/29/94 8/3/94 8/11/94 8/12/94 % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% OS 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Predecessor 44 42 48 51 52 54 3:42 pm Page 2 Resource Initials HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR PR AB BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,M6,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR BMOO,AB,BMOR BMOO,AD,BMOR,PR 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 2 5 6 7 8 3 4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 17 18 23 31 50 51 24 32 43 44 33 34 27 25 26 52 35 36 37 Name DATA COLLECTION Request info from LRSD on process TEAM INQUIRY__________________________________ Develop team interview process Plan for Joshua involvement Develop interview team questionnaire Analyze response/material from LRSD________ Request clarificatlon/additlonal info fro Approve interview team questionnaire Prepare master list of team members________ Make assignments for team calling__________ Write initial call script Write letter for team interviews Make initial calls to team members Make master Interview list Mall team member letters MRC INQUIRY Determine content of MRC letter Send letter to MRC on role Response back from MRC on role ADMIN INQUIRY__________________________ Develop admin Inquiry process Schedule admin interviews Conduct team interviews COTpile team interview information Schedule MRC member interviews Develop admin questionnaire OTHER Budget hearing preparations_______ Develop MRC member questionnaire Approve admin questionnaire REPORT PREPARATION 36 39 Determine report format Conduct admin Interviews Compile admin interview information Prepare MRC role information_____________ Conduct MRC member interviews____________ Compile MRC interview results Budget hearings______________________________ FEEDBACK SESSION_________________________ Determine feedback session date/agenda Determine feedback participants_________ Write feedback invitations Logistics for feedback session Durati 12d Id 20d Id lid 5d 6d 6d Id 2d 2d Id 2d 3d 4d 3d 1d 2d 2d 7d 16d 2d 7d 5d 8d 4d 2d 20d 7d 6d Id 22d lid 6d lOd 8d 3d 7d 3d 13d Id Id Id 12d Scheduled Start 5/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/1/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 7/12/94 7/13/94 7/13/94, 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/19/94 7/20/94 __________7/20/94 7/20/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 7/26/94 7/27/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 Scheduled Finish 7/15/94 6/30/94 7/27/94 6/30/94 7/14/94 7/7/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/8/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/15/94 7/18/94 7/15/94 8/4/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 8/4/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 7/27/94 ____________7/21/94 ____________7/19/94 ___________8/12/94 7/26/94 7/26/94 7/20/94 ___________8/19/94 8/4/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 8/4/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 7/29/94 ___________8/17/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 _____________8/1/94 8/16/94 % Complete 54% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 0% 0% ________05^ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ______q% 0% ___________ 0% ______q% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ___________0% 0% ________0% 0% 0% ______q% 0% Predecessor Resource Initials HS 3:46 pm Page 1 6 6 2 2 8 6 10 9 9 13,11,12 14 14 20 21 2 29 16,14 17 21 29,3 22,21 31 18,34,26,27 30 33 22 24,23 25___________ 51 36 37,36 36 HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO,Afl HS,MG,MP,BMOO M6,MP,BMOO,AB,HS MG,MP,BMOO,AB AB PR PR AB MP,BM00 MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR PR MG,MP,AB,BMOO AB AB MG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,Afi HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR,AB HS,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,Afi BMOO,Afi,BMOR HS,MG,MP,AB Afi HS,AB,PR HS,M6,MP HS,MG,MP,BM00,AB HS,MO,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB_____________ HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR HS HS HS PR 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 53 40 54 45 46 55 47 41 42 48 49 Name ODM retreat Mail feedback invitations Prepare for LRSD budget hearing Prepare report draft________ _____Edit report draft__________________ Budget hearing______________________ Print report________________________ Conduct feedback session Incorporate feedback changes Print final report_________________ File report with Court Duratl 3d Id 7d 5d 2d Id Id Id 2d Id Od Scheduled Start 8/1/94 8/2/94 8/3/94 8/4/94 8/12/94 8/12/94 8/15/94 8/16/94 8/16/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 Scheduled Finish 8/3/94 8/2/94 8/11/94 8/10/94 8/15/94 8/12/94 8/15/94 8/16/94 8/17/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Predecessor 38 52 44 54 39,40 41 42 48 Resource Initials HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR PR BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MF,BMOO,PR,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB_________________ PR AB 3:46 pm Page 2 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 Name DATA COLLECTION 6 HH July 3 s|s|m|t|w|t|f]~s July 10 s|m|t|w|t|f|s July 17 s|m|t|w|t|f|s July 24 s|m|t|w|t|f|s S July 31 Auqu I M I T I W I T I F I S ~S I M I T I W 2 Request info from LRSD on process I 3 Analyze response/material from LRSD 4 Request clarlficatlon/additional info fro 5 TEAM INQUIRY 6 Develop team interview process I 7 Plan for Joshua involvement 8 Develop Interview team questionnaire 9 Approve interview team questionnaire I 10 Prepare master list of team members 11 Make assignments for team calling 12 Write initial call script I 13 Write letter for team Interviews 14 Make initial calls to team members 15 Make master Interview list 16 Mall team member letters 17 Conduct team interviews V//////////A 18 Compile team interview Information 19 MRC INQUIRY 20 Determine content of MRC letter 21 Send letter to MRC on role 22 Response back from MRC on role 23 Schedule MRC member interviews 24 Develop MRC member questionnaire 25 Conduct MRC member interviews Project: LRSD Parent Involvemen Date: 7/15/94 Critical Noncrltical 3:49 pm Progress Summary Milestone Rolled Up Page 1 7/15/946 LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 26 Name Compile MRC interview results T IH s s 27 Prepare MRC role information 1 28 ADMIN INQUIRY 29 Develop admin inquiry process 30 Schedule admin interviews 31 Develop admin questionnaire I 32 Approve admin questionnaire 33 Conduct admin interviews 34 Compile admin interview information 35 FEEDBACK SESSION 36 Determine feedback session date/agenda 37 Determine feedback participants 36 Write feedback invitations 39 Logistics for feedback session 40 Mall feedback invitations 41 Conduct feedback session 42 Incorporate feedback changes 43 REPORT PREPARATION 44 Determine report format 45 Prepare report draft 46 Edit report draft 47 Print report ! 48 Print final report 49 File report with Court 60 OTHER Project: LRSD Parent Involvemen Date: 7/15/94 Critical Noncritical 3:49 pm July 3 July 10 July 17 |m|t|w|t|f|s T[m|t|w|t|f|s T|m|t|w|t|f| Progress Milestone s s i I Page 2 July 24 I M I T I W I T I F I s s July 31 I M I T I W I T I F I s s Augu I M I T I W r* 0 ! 0 0 0 Summary Rolled Up 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 51 52 53 54 55 Name Budget hearing preparations Budget hearings ODM retreat Prepare for LRSD budget hearing Budget hearing Project: LRSD Parent Involvenen Date: 7/15/94 Critical Noncrltlcal 3:49 pro 6 lEI s July 3 s|m|t|w|t|f|s Progress Milestone s July 10 |m|t|w|t|f|s s Page 3 July 17 July 24 |m|t|w|t|f|s s[m(t|w|t|f| Summary Rolled Up s s July 31 [m|t|w|t|f|s s Augu JmJtjV 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT t7 1 F 1 s I s |m 1 August 14 T W August 21 |t|f|s s|m|tw|t|f| S S August 28 T W Md s S September 4 I M I T I W I T I F I s s September 11 September 18 I M I T [ W I T I F I S ~3 I M I T I W I T I F I s s September 25 October 2 |m[t|w|t|f[s s|m|t|w|t|f| s s Oc Project: LRSD Parent Involvemen Date: 7/15/94 Critical Progress 3:49 pm Noncritical Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 4 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT t7 UH s I s August 14 I M I T V]t I F I s s August 21 I M I T W [ T I F I s s August 28 T W I T I F I S s September 4 I M I T I W I T I F I s September 11 8|m|t|w|t|f| s September 18 s|m[t|w|t|f| s s i I I September 25 October 2 |m|t|w|t|f|3~s|m|t|w|t|f|s S I M I Oc T 0 i i 0 ! I i Project: LRSD Parent Involvemen Date: 7/15/94 Critical Noncritical 3:49 pm Progress Summary Milestone Rolled Up Page 5 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT t7 T I F I s S I M August 14 I T I W I T |TJ s s August 21 I M I T VJt I F I s s August 28 I MITJwITIF I s s September 4 I M I T I W I T I F I S S September 11 I M I T I W I T I F I S S September 18 I M [ T I W I T I F I s S September 2S October 2 I M I T [ W 1 T I F I S ~s|m1t|w|t1f| S S Oc 3 Project: LRSD Parent Involvemen Date\n7/15/94 Critical Noncritical 3:49 pm Progress Sutnnary Milestone Rolled Up Page 6 7/15/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Name DATA COLLECTION______________________________ Request info from LRSD on process__________ Analyze response/material from LRSD________ Request clarification/additional info fro TEAM INQUIRY Develop team interview process Plan for Joshua involvement Develop Interview team questionnaire Approve interview team questionnaire Prepare master list of team members Make assignments for team calling Write initial call script_________ Write letter for team Interviews Make initial calls to team members Make master interview list Mall team member letters Conduct team interviews Summarize team interviews by school Summarize/ note trends Pull together summaries MRC INQUIRY Determine content of MRC letter Send letter to MRC on role Response back from MRC on role Schedule MRC member interviews Develop MRC member questionnaire Conduct MRC member interviews Compile MRC interview results Prepare MRC role information ADMIN INQUIRY Develop admin inquiry process Schedule admin Interviews Develop admin questionnaire Approve admin questionnaire__________ Conduct admin interviews Compile admin interview information FEEDBACK SESSION Determine feedback session date/agenda Determine feedback participants Write feedback invitations Logistics for feedback session Mall feedback invitations Conduct feedback session Incorporate feedback changes Durati 12d Id 6d 6d 22d Id lid 5d Id 2d 2d Id 2d 3d 4d 3d 5d 8d 3d Id 16d 2d 2d 7d 4d 3d 7d 8d 16d 2d 7d 2d Id 6d lOd 13d Id Id Id 12d Id Id 2d Scheduled Start 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/8/94 7/6/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/1/94 7/8/94 7/12/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/18/94 7/21/94 7/27/94 7/29/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/16/94 7/19/94 7/27/94 7/27/94 7/26/94 7/14/64 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/16/94 7/20/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 6/2/94 8/16/94 8/16/94 Scheduled Finish 7/15/94 6/30/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/29/94 6/30/94 7/14/94 7/7/94 7/8/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/15/94 7/18/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/27/94 7/29/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/21/94 7/27/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 \"8/17^ - ffZ4/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/19/94 7/20/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 8/J7/S4 X. 8/1/94 8/16/94 8/16/94 8/17/94 % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 62% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% IQO^ 0% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% oV 0% 0% 0% Predecessor 2 2 6 6 8 6 10 9 9 13,11,12 14 14 16,14 17 18 19 22 23 23 24,23 26,25 27 24 2 31 31,3 33 32 35 38 39,38 38 40 41,42 43 Resource Initials HS NG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO AB PR PR AB MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP HS,NG,NP MG,MP,AB,BMOO AB AB HS,PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB AB HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS HS HS PR PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,NG,MP,AB 5:01 pm Page 1 7/29/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Name REPORT PREPARATION Determine report format Prepare report draft Edit report draft Print report Print final report______ File report with Court *********NOTE OTHER________________________________ Budget hearing preparations Transcript review for directives Court Order directives Budget hearings______________________ ODM retreat Prepare for LRSD budget hearing Budget hearing Durati 22d lid 5d 2d Id Id Od 20d 7d 3d 2d 3d 3d 7d Id Scheduled Start 7/20/94 7/20/94 8/4/94 ___________ 8/15/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/20/94 7/21/94 7/27/94 8/1/94 8/3/94 8/12/94 Scheduled Finish 8/19/94 8/4/94 8/10/94 8/15/94 8/15794 8/18/94 8/19/94 8/12/84 7/26/94 7/24/94 7/24/94 7/29/94 8/3/94 8/11/94 8/12/94 5:01 pm Page 2 % Complete 0% 0% _0% 0% 0% 0% 58% 100% 100% 100% 100% ?co% 0% 0% Predecessor 18,36,28,29 46 44 50 55 56 58 Resource Initials HS,AB,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR_____________________ PR AB BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,BMOR PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR BMOO,ABxBMOR BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR 7/29/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 2 6 6 7 8 3 4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 30 31 32 17 25 33 62 53 26 34 46 46 54 18 55 35 36 29 19 27 28 56 20 37 Name DATA COLLECTION______________________________ Request info from LRSD on process TEAM INQUIRY__________________________________ Develop team interview process_________ _____Plan for Joshua involvement__________________ Develop interview team questionnaire Analyze response/material from LRSD Request clarlficatlon/additional info fro Approve interview team questionnaire Prepare master list of team members Make assignments for team calling Write initial call script_____________________ Write letter for team interviews Make initial calls to team members Make master interview list Mail team member letters MRC INQUIRY Determine content of MRC letter Send letter to MRC on role Response back from MRC on role ADMIN INQUIRY_____________________ Develop admin inquiry process Schedule admin interviews Conduct team interviews Schedule MRC member interviews Develop admin questionnaire OTHER________________________________ Budget hearing preparations Develop MRC member questionnaire Approve admin questionnaire REPORT PREPARATION Determine report format *********note Transcript review for directives Summarize team interviews by school Court Order directives Conduct admin interviews Compile admin interview information Prepare MRC role information_________ Summarize/ note trends Conduct MRC member interviews Compile MRC interview results________ Budget hearings__________________________ Pull together summaries FEEDBACK SESSION Durati 12d Id 22d Id lid 5d 6d 6d Id 2d 2d Id 2d 3d 4d 3d 16d 2d 2d 7d 16d 2d 7d 5d 4d 2d 20d 7d 6d Id 22d lid 3d 6d 2d 6d lOd 8d 3d 3d 7d 3d Id 13d Scheduled Start 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/1/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 7/12/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 __________7/18/94 7/18/94 7/19/94 7/20/94 7/20/94 7/20/94 7/20/94 7/21/94 7/21/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 7/26/94 7/27/94 7/27/94 7/27/94 7/27/94 7/29/94 8/1/94 Scheduled Finish ___________7/1S/94 6/30/94 7/29/94 6/30/94 7/14/94 7/7/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/8/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/15/94 7/18/94 7/15/94 ____________8/4/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 8/4/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/22/94 7/21/94 7/19/94 ___________8/12/94 7/26/94 7/27/94 7/20/94 8/19/94 8/4/94 7/24/94 7/27/94 7/24/94 7/29/94 8/4/94 8/4/94 7/29/94 ____________7/29/94 8/4/94 7/29/94 7/29/94 8/17/94 % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 62% 100% 100% 100% _______80^ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 68% 100% 100% 100% ________0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 90% 50% 0% ________100% ________10^ 0% 100% 100% 0% Predecessor Resource Initials HS 5:07 pm Page 1 6 6 2 2 8 6 10 9 9 13,11,12 14 14 22 23 2 31 16,14 23 31,3 24,23 33 18,36,28,29 17 32 35 24 18____ 26,25 27____ 55 19 HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB,HS MG,MP,BMOO,AB AB PR PR AB MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,Afi PR PR MG,MP,AB,BMOO AB AB MG,MP,BMOO,Afi,HS HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,AB HS,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,AB AB HS,AB,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,BMOR HS,MG,MP PR HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB_______ HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP_________________ HS,MG,MP,AB_____________ HS,MG,MP,AB_____________ HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP 7/29/94LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 38 39 40 41 57 42 58 47 48 59 49 43 44 50 51 Name Determine feedback session date/agenda Determine feedback participants Write feedback invitations Logistics for feedback session ODM retreat Mall feedback invitations Prepare for LRSD budget hearing Prepare report draft Edit report draft_____________________ _____Budget hearing_______________________________ Print report_________________________________ Conduct feedback session Incorporate feedback changes Print final report File report with Court Durati Id Id Id 12d 3d Id 7d 5d 2d Id Id Id 2d Id Od Scheduled Start 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/2/94 8/3/94 8/4/94 8/12/94 8/12/94 8/15/94 8/16/94 8/16/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 Scheduled Finish 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 ____________6/16/94 8/3/94 8/2/94 0/11/94 0/10/94 8/15/94 8/12/94 8/15/94 8/16/94 8/17/94 8/18/94 8/19/94 % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Predecessor 36 39/38 38 40 56 46 58 41/42 43 44 50 Resource Initials HS HS HS PR____________________________ HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR PR BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR PR HS,MG,MP,AB HS,MG,MP,AB PR AB 5:07 pm Page 2 7/29/941 Timeline for Monitorii^ Project on Parent Involvement in Hiring LRSD Principals June 30 Write letter to Hank Williams requesting information regarding hiring process July 1- 7 Begin to develop questionnaire for interviews Write letter to MRC regarding their role Contact LRSD administrators to set interview times during the third week in July July? Receive information requested from LRSD July 8-12 Review data and finalize questionnaire items July 13-15 ODM Retreat July 18-25 Conduct interviews July 25 Mail out invitations to the feedback session July 26 Last-minute court preparation July 27 Attend hearing on budget August 1-5 Compile information, write report, and edit lite August 8 Feedback session for all those interviewed August 9 Incorporate changes prompted by feedback session August 11 File report with the court LRSD PARENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Name Request info from LRSD on process Develop team interview process___________________ Develop interview team questionnaire____________ Approve interview team questionnaire Plan for Joshua Involvement Determine content of MRC letter Send letter to MRC on role Response back from MRC on role____________________ Prepare MRC role Information Request clarlfication/additional info from LR Analyze response/material from LRSD Develop admin Inquiry process Develop admin questionnaire Approve admin questionnaire Schedule admin interviews Conduct admin Interviews Prepare master list of tniw li Make assignments for team calling Write initial call script_________________ Write letter for team Interviews Make initial calls to team members Make master interview list Mall team member letters Conduct team Interviews Compile team Interview information Compile admin interview information Determine feedback session date/agenda Determine feedback participants Write feedback invitations Mall feedback Invitations Logistics for feedback session__________ Budget hearing preparations______________ Budget hearings ODM retreat P^^re report draft Prepare for LRSD budget hearing_________ Budget hearing Edit report draft___________________________ Print report__________________________________ Conduct feedback session Incorporate feedback changes_____________ Print final report__________________________ File report with Court Duratl Id Id 5d Id lid 2d 2d lid 7d 6d 6d 2d 2d Id 7d 6d 2d 2d Id 2d 3d 4d 3d 5d 8d lid Id Id Id Id Id 7d 3d 3d 4d 7d Id 2d Id Id 3d 2d Od Scheduled Start 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/1/94 7/8/94 6/30/94 7/14/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 8/2/94 7/8/94 7/8/94 7/14/94 7/18/94 7/20/94 7/14/94 7/22/94 7/12/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/13/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/22/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/1/94 8/2/94 8/1/94 7/18/94 Scheduled Finish 7/27/94 8/1/94 8/5/94 8/3/94 8/12/94 8/11/94 8/15/94 8/16/94 ^/t7 -8/4^4 6/30/94 6/30/94 7/7/94  7/8/94 7/14/94  7/15/94 7/15/94 J\"* 8/10/94 7/15/94 ' 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/19/94 7/20/94 7/22/94 7/29/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/13/94 7/14/94 7/15/94 7/18/94 7/15/94 7/22/94 7/27/94 8/5/94 8/1/94  8/1/94 8/1/94 8/2/94 8/1/94 7/26/94 7/29/94 8/3/94 8/10/94 8/11/94 8/12/94 87^^2794 8/15/94 8/16/94 y//7 tw4 8/18/94 - 8/20/^ ^7 % Complete 100% 100% 100% looV 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Predecessor 2 3 6 7 8 1 1 1 12 13 14 15 4 17 4 4 20 21 21 23 24 16 27 28 29 27 32 25,26,9,11 33 36 37 38 39,31,30 40 41 42 Page 1 Resource Initials HS HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB MG,MP,AB MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB MG,MP,BMOO,AB MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB AB HS,MG,MP HS,MG,MP,BMOO PR PR AB MP,BMOO MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS HS HS PR PR BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,PR BMOO,AB,BMOR BMOO,AB,BMOR,PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR HS,MG,MP,BMOO HS,MG,MP,BMOO,AB PR ABDate: July 1, 1994 To: Horace From: tn Subjected Parent involvement and MRC role in principal selections Here are some of the questions that occurred to me as 1 was talking with folks who had been members of interview committees. They arent necessarily worded very well nor are they in any particular order\n1 just tried to capture the thought. 1. Who recruited you to be a member of the interview committee? X2. When were you recruited? 3. What was your understanding of your role as a committee member? Who explained that role to you? When? Did you receive a written role description? From whom? When? Did you receive an oral description of your role? From whom? When? V\" 4. What is your understanding of the criteria that were used to select committee members? Who was responsible for recruiting the committee members? 6. The LRSD has listed the folloAving people as members of your committee: Do you agree that these were your fellow committee members? If not, please indicate the nature of your disagreement. Where all committee members present during the interview? 7. How many interview sessions did you hold? When? Approximately how long did each session last? If more than one session was held, why? 1. What written instructions to the committee, principal job descriptions, rating criteria, interview questions, or other information did you receive prior to the interview session? How far in advance of the interview session did you receive this information? 9. What oral instructions to the committee, principal job descriptions, rating criteria, interview questions, or other information did you receive prior to the interview session? How far in advance of the interview session did you receive this information? 10. Did you or any other member(s) spend time composing questions to use during the interview? How much time did you devote to this activity? V, 11. Did members of your committee meet before the interview session to review your roles, go over the interview process, or otherwise discuss the upcoming interviews? If so, how many members met? For how long? How far in advance of the interview session? What topics did you discuss?12. Who served as the chairperson of your interview committee? What is your understanding of how that person was selected or assigned to that role? 13. Who explained to the committee what the next step(s) would be after the interviews were completed? When were the next steps explained? Briefly describe what you understood those steps to be. To what extent did those steps occur? When? 14. What was your understanding of the timeframe for the interview process and principal selection? 15. What was your understanding of who would make the final selection of the principal? 16. What was your understanding of the weight the committees input would be given in final selection of the principal? 17. Briefly describe the interview process as you experienced it when the committee interviewed the candidates. 18. To what extent did you and your fellow committee members reach a consensus on your choices for your top candidates? 19. Do what extent were your expectations fulfilled regarding the interview and principal selection process? If your expectations were not met, explain. 20. At any time during the interview or selection process did you or your committee talk with the superintendent or his representative about the selection process or its outcome? Explain. 21. Did the committee chairperson or someone else provide a means for committee members to give feedback on their involvement as a committee volunteer? A means to give suggestions on ways to improve the process? Who provided that means? What feedback or suggestions did you give? 22. Overall, approximately how much time did you spend in all activities relative to your role as an interview committee member? 23. 24. 25. Did you feel that your time as an interview volunteer was well spent? Why or why not? How willing would you be to serve as an interview committee member in the future? How did the LRSD communicate its appreciate to you for serving as an interview committee volunteer?7/1 /^y Timeline for Monitoring Project on Parent Involvement in Hiring LRSD Principals June 30 Write letter to Hank Williams requesting information regarding hiring process July 1- 7 Begin to develop questionnaire for interviews Write letter to MRC regarding their role Contact LRSD administrators to set interview times during the third week in July July? Receive information requested from LRSD July 8-12 Review data and finalize questionnaire items July 13-15 ODM Retreat July 18-25 Conduct interviews J uly 25 Mail out invitations to the feedback session July 26 Last-minute court preparation July 27 Attend hearing on budget August 1-5 Compile information, write report, and edit lite August 8 Feedback session for all those interviewed August 9 Incorporate changes prompted by feedback session August 11 File report with the court -5?- 1^ Lutle Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT July 7, 1994 RECElV-0 JUL 7 1994 Office CI Desegregaticn f,fc .f.ng Mrs. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ann: In keeping with your request of July 30, 1994, I have enclosed documents and other information in connection with the principal selections/transfers for the 1994-95 school year. If other information is needed, please let me know. Sincerely, 6^^ Henry . Williams Superintendent of Schools HPW:nr 810 West Markham street  Little Rock, Aritansas 72201  (501)824-2000 INFORMATION REQUESTED BY ODM REGARDING PRINCIPAL SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE 1994-95 SCHOOL YEAR: 1. A list of all LRSD schools which had principal vacancies for the 1994-95 school year: J. A. Fair High School Forest Heights Junior High School Henderson Junior High School Pulaski Heights Jr. High School (to be filled) Alternative Learning Center Carver Magnet School (to be filled) Gibbs Magnet School 2. A list of those schools whose principal was hired in consultation with an interview committee, and a list of those schools whose principal was hired without consultation with an interview committee: Schools Interviewed by a Team: J. A. Fair Cloverdale Jr. High Forest Heights Jr. High Southwest Junior High Carver Magnet School (To be determined) Gibbs Magnet Mitchell Incentive School Rightsell Incentive School Franklin Incentive School Williams Magnet School Principals placed without Interview Team: Mabelvale Junior High School Henderson Junior High School Baseline Elementary School Fair Park Elementary School Mabelvale Elementary School Alternative Learning Center To be filled: RECEIVED Pulaski Heights Jr. High Bale Elementary Brady Elementary Carver Magnet School JUL 7 1994 Office of Desegregaiicri wonitoring 3. Listing of Interview Teams PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW TEAMS June, 1994 SCHOOL NAME POSITION RECEIVED JUL 1 1994 Office of Desegregation RACE SEX CARVER June 6: 1:00-4:30 Dexter Doyne Vai Henry Donna Thrower Linda Ammel Teata Pace Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Dennis Glasgow Parent (PCSSD) Parent (NLRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Counselor) Teacher (Gr. 5) Asst. Superintendent Asst. Superintendent Curr. Supervisor- Science B W B W B W B W M M F F F F M M GIBBS June 7: 9:00-noon Willie Jones Zachary Polett Easter Tucker Vicki Gonterman Wilhemina Lewellen Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Marie McNeal Ann Cushion Dodie Angulo Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Gr. 1) Teacher (Specialist) Asst Superintendent Asst Superintendent Curr. Supervisor - Social Studies Observer (Parent) Observer (Parent) B W B W B W B B W W WILLIAMS June?: 1:30-5:00 Brenda Casey Richard Kalkbrenner Charles Moore Ella Mobley Ann Washington Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Mable Donaldson Sterling Ingram Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (NLRSD) Teacher (Gr. 1) Teacher (Specialist) Asst Superintendent Asst. Superintendent Curr. Supervisor - Gifted/Talented Associate to the Deputy Supt B W B B y/ W B B B M M F F F F M F F M F M M F F F M F MSCHOOL NAME POSITION RACE SEX CLOVERDALE JR. June 8: 8:30-noon Monica Ellis Mildred Walker Rose Williams Sara Gaines Samuel Hunt Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Shyrel Rose Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Math) Teacher (Soc.St) Assoc. Supt. Deputy Supt Supervisor - Special Ed. W B B W B W B B F F F F M M F F FOREST HEIGHTS JR. June 8: 1:00-4:00 Doris Hendrix Shirley Lamkin Melissa Moody Denise Kornegay Glenn Holloway Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Dennis Glasgow Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (English) Teacher (Math) Assoc. Supt Deputy Supt Curr. Supervisor - Science B B W W B W B W F F F F M M F M SOUTHWEST JR. June 9: 1:30-4:30 Paulette Blevins Debbie Elder Ron Sterling Bettie Williford Sherrie Lack Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Alice Stovall Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Soc.St) Teacher (English) Assoc. Supt. Deputy Supt Curr. Supervisor Reading W W B B W W B W F F M F F M F FSCHOOL NAME POSITION RACE SEX J. A. FAIR HIGH June 6: 2:00-5:00 Barbara Gilkey James Keown Patsy Reese Ruthie Hiett Robert Palmer Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Gene Parker Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Soc.SL) Teacher (Soc.SL) Assoc. SupL Deputy Supt Curr. Supervisor - English B B W W B W B W F M F F M M F MPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW TEAMS JUNE 1994 SCHOOL INTERVIEW DATE/TIME FRANKLIN June 8: 9:00 -12:00 NAME POSITION RACE SEX MITCHELL June 8: 1:30 - 4:30 RIGHTSELL June 9: 9:00 -12:00 Sherry Fields Louise Carpenter Karen Carter Almeda Giles Carolyn Gray Sandra McIntosh Sterling Ingram Larry Robertson Kirke Herman Donna Bennett Mildred Walker Mary Ann Hansen Deloris Iverson Teresa Lockhart Sterling Ingram Margaret Gremillion Kirke Herman Sherry Pripusich Rosalyn Zeigler Jacque Kesler Tommy Dodson Stacy Blacknail Delois Sykes Sterling Ingram Margaret Gremillion Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Kgtn) Teacher (Gr.6) Teacher (Gr,6) Teacher (Rdg.) Parent (LRSD) Admin. Admin. Joshua Rep. Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Gr. 5) Teacher (Music) Teacher (Aide) Parent (LRSD) Admin. Admin. Joshua Rep. Parent (LRSD) Teacher (Gr. 1) Teacher (Gr. 5) Parent (Menifee) Teacher (Spec.) Joshua Rep. Admin. Admin. W W W B yN B B B B W B W B B B yN B W B W B B B B W F F F F F F M M M F F F F F M F M F F F M F F M FName Iton No. 3 of OEM Request PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW TEAMS June, 1994 Position Address Telephone CARVER Dexter Doyne Vai Henry Donna Thrower Linda Ammel Teata Pace Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Dennis Glasgow Parent Parent Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator P. O. Box 166, College Station 401 West 4th, NLR 5427 Thrush Road 2105 Dorchester 25027 Highway 365 North, NLR Little Rock School District tl It II It 490-1255 374-5115 565-3012 225-9438 851-0434 324-2006 324-2007 324-0518 FRANKLIN Sherry Fields Sandra McIntosh Karen Carter Almeda Giles Carolyn Gray Sterling Ingram Larry Robertson Kirke Herman Parent (did not show) Parent Teacher Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Joshua Rep. 5824 West 14th Street 19118 Denny Road 1770 Barrow Road No. 96 1607 Shumate Little Rock School District It II 1723 Broadway (Walker Law Firm) 821-2113 221-2779 227-5928 324-2124 324-2007 374-3758 MITCHELL Donna Bennett Teresa Lockhart Mildred Walker Mary Ann Hanson Delores Iverson Sterling Ingram Margaret Gremillion Kirke Herman Parent 1719 Charlotte Circle Parent (did not show) Teacher Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Joshua Rep. P.O. Box 524 (72053) 2108 State 1811 Schiller Little Rock School District 490-1009 374-7054 II It 1723 Broadway (Walker Law Firm) 324-2124 324-2006 374-3758RIGHTSELL Sherry Pripusich Tommy Dodson Rosalyn Zeigler Jacque Kesler Stacy Blacknall Sterling Ingram Margaret Gremillion Delois Sykes Parent (did not show) Parent Teacher Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Joshua Rep. #1 Dodson Drive, Menifee 1517 Pulaski 47 LeFever Lane #2A Chimney Rock Little Rock School District II II 1723 Broadway (Walker Law Firm) 374-3517 664-8650 888-4628 324-2124 324-2006 374-3758 GIBBS Willie Jones Zachary Polett Easter Tucker Vicki Gonterman Wilhemina Lewellan Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Marie McNeal Parent Parent Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator 614 North Taylor 9510 Vanderbilt P.O. Box 502, Alexander 1922 Wolfe Little Rock School District It It It It 664-9259 227-9870 847-3485 372-5612 324-2006 324-2007 324-0514 WILLIAMS Brenda Casey Richard Kalkbrenner Charles Moore Ella Mobley Ann Washington Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Sterling Ingram Mable Donaldson Parent Parent Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator Administrator 4617 Eastwood Road 1716 Beechwood 222 Apple Valley Drive, NLR 11283 Southridge Drive 11919 Pleasantree Drive Little Rock School District It It It It It 663-1678 834-7216 227-6496 225-5254 324-2006 324-2007 324-2124 324-2197 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH Monica Ellis Mildred Walker Rose Williams Sara Gaines Samuel Hunt Dr. Russ Mayo Estelle Matths Sheiyl Rose Parent (did not show) Parent (did not show) Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator 5813 Baseline, No. 253 7900 Bumelle Drive P.O. Box 517, Augusta Little Rock School District It It It II 568-4567 565-5813 347-2031 324-2271 324-2010 324-2188FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH Doris Hendrix Shirley Lamkin Melissa Moody Denise Kornegay Glenn Holloway Dr. Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Dennis Glasgow Parent (did not show) Parent 1806 South Monroe Parent (did not show) Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator 11 Riata Court 2109 Romine Little Rock School District M II It It 663-6588 565-0893 324-2271 324-2010 324-0518 J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Barbara Gilkey James Keown Patsy Reese Ruthie Hiett Robert Pahner Dr. Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Gene Parker Parent Parent Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator 10513 Diamond Drive 12 Willow Oak Court #9 Wildberry Place #9 Lisa Court #9 Coral Court Little Rock School District II tl 11 It 562-4162 373-6471 455-3584 224-1041 225-2435 324-2271 324-2010 324-0513 SOUTHWEST Paulette Blevins Debbie Elder Ron Sterling Bettie Williford Sherrie Lack Dr. Russ Mayo Estelle Matthis Alice Stovall Parent Parent Parent Teacher Teacher Administrator Administrator Administrator 5912 Pecan Lake 31 Rosemont 10001 Yellow Pine Lane 8425 Labette Drive 19 Lawrence Road, Greenbrier Little Rock School District 568-9262 565-1907 455-1785 225-3485 It tl II tl 324-2271 324-2010 324-05264. Criteria Used to Select Interview Team Members (Teachers, Parents, Administrators) Review the vacancy lists (positions to be filled) RECEIVED Discuss the identified needs of the designated school(s) JUL 7 1994 Discuss the desired characteristics of the instructional leader needed for each site Office of Desegrsgaiion ill' Identify the composition of the interview team (number, categories, etc.) Contact the PTA president(s) of designated school(s). President is requested to submit three (3) names of parents to serve on the interview team. (Attention is to be given to the race/gender of the parents selected.) Central office administrators identify and select district personnel to serve on interview team(s): Assistant superintendents (school(s) supervised) Other central office representative with overall knowledge of district and designated position (curriculum supervisors) Teachers - designated school(s) (informed teachers who appear to be objective and perceptive of schools needs) Incentive Schools - staffing committees are used in lieu of interview teams. Staffing committees were expanded to be more inclusive racially. Principals of affected schools were contacted to provide additional parent names. Race and gender are addressed and adjustments are made if the interview teams are not inclusive racially. Written notification listing date/time/place for interview is sent to members of the interview teams.5. Verbal Communication/Instruction to Interview Teams RSCSiVSD ..rai JUL 7 1994 Office ci DssegregaSon Ucnhonng INTERVIEW PROTOCOL Prior to the consideration and selection of Interview Committees for the 1994-95 principalships at various schools in the district, a meeting was held on May 31, 1994, to discuss the interview protocol to be used. It was agreed between the participants that although there was no written procedure or policy, there has been a well-known long-standing past practice of interview protocol. The above-mentioned interview protocol was to be used for selection of the 1994-95 principalships. It was further agreed that this protocol would be documented and incorporated into the Personnel section of the Policy and Procedures Manual. Attending the meeting were Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent\nMr. Brady Gadberry, Director of Labor Relations\nand Dr. Richard Hurley, Director of Human Resources.k LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. {\n\u0026amp; iSj EPS CODE: SELECTION OF APPLICANTS SCHOOL PRINCIPALS er: '1 SI GCAB Persons desiring employment as a School Principal shall file an application in writing (Resume, letter of intent, or vitae are acceptable for the initial contact. District application forms will then be provided for applicants not currently employed with Little Rock School District.) District administration officials will screen the applicants for acceptability. Taken into consideration certification, experience, education, performance reviews, and references. The Deputy Superintendent and/or the are Assistant Superintendent(s) will prepare a list of interview questions to be used in the interview process. The Human Resources Director will review the questions for appropriateness regarding legal issues (ie: E.E.O., Affirmative Action, Americans with Disability Act, etc.) An interview committee will be selected/appointed, follows: Three Two Three as 1. 2. 3. (3) (2) (3) Parents/Patrons Teachers Administration Representatives Note:l Note:2 Note:3 The Parent/Patrons representatives will be selected by a process: designated by the PTA president of the of the affected school. The teacher(s) representatives shall be from the affected school and appointed by the Administration. The Deputy Superintendent appropriate staff - Assistant (in consultation with Supeirvisors, and Principals) Superintendents, Administration representatives. may designate the *NOTE: The committee's composition shall be balanced, as nearly as possible, by race and gender.'ilj /a A n. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE\nGCAB 6. The interview committee shall meet to interview and recommend candidates. The interview committee will be provided folders containing the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) An interview schedule The approved interview questions An approved candidate rating form The applicant's application materials 7. The interview committee shall interview the applicants and complete the ratings sheet. The committee, through consensus, will agree upon and submit a recommendation of the top three (3) candidates to the Superintendent. (Note: Although the applicants are rated, the ratings are only for use in reaching consensus and need not be the sole basis for selecting the recommended candidates.) 8. The Superintendent shall review the recommendations of the Interview Committee and select the applicant to be submitted for Board approval. The Superintendent may at his/her option, reject each of the three (3) applicants and require that the committee reconvene to determine new recommendations. 9. Once the Superintendent has selected an acceptable applicant, he/she will submit that individual's name to the Board of Directors for approval. If the applicant is currently serving as a Principal, the Superintendent may reassign the Principal and advise the Board of the lateral transfer. 10. When approved, the candidate shall receive a contract which details his information. salary. pay grade, and other pertinent Item No. 6 of OEM Reouest: 5k ^'3 PTSTJ R -Sw st   a t2=ca '*^\u0026gt;7 BT ,7S7!!B IV i ( LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: GCDA NOMINATION BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS JUL 7 5994 Oifics cf Dsss\nirsuHiion ,Mcri\nic,\u0026lt;ng All certified employees of the Board of Directors, except the Superintendent, shall be selected upon nomination by the Superintendent of Schools. ------- - person nominated by the Superintendent of Schools be rejected by the Board of Directors, it shall be the duty of the Superintendent of Schools to make another nomination. SUPERINTENDENT'S RESPONSIBILITY IN NOMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES Should a It shall be the duty of the Superintendent of Schools to see that persons nominated for employment to the Board of Directors shall meet all qualifications established by law and by the Board of Directors for the type of position for which the nomination is made. TIME OF CONTRACT CONSIDERATION The timing of the election of all certified administrators shall be on schedule in accordance with state law. Adopted: May 27, 1982 \u0026lt; a it.', si: \u0026gt;LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: GCD VACANCIES AND PROMOTIONS Vacancies and promotions shall be handled in accordance with the Professional Negotiations Agreements between the Board of Directors and the Classroom Teachers Association or the Principals' Round Table, whichever is appropriate. Adopted: March 25, 1982 Cross Reference: CTA PN Agreement PRT PN Agreement ? A#7 - Job Descriptions #8 - Job posting RECEIVED PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEAS^|POS\n May 10, 1994 Office of Desegregation Monitoring The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following positions for the 1994-95 school year: POSITIONS\nPrincipals - Six (6) Positions - (1) Williams Magnet (1) Gibbs Magnet (1) Carver Magnet (1) Mitchell Incentive (1) Franklin Incentive (1) Rightsell Incentive QUALIFICATIONS\n1. At least five (5) years experience as a teacher and/or administrator. 2. A master's degree or higher, with eligibility for Arkansas certification as an elementary principal. 3. Evidence of strong organizational skills. 4. Knowledge of curriculum development and successful teaching methods. 5. Demonstrates the conviction that all students can learn  and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 6. Evidence of strong experience in dealing with student problems. 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement. 8. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. NOTE\nAPPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW, BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. Assumes responsibility for the management and monitoring of his/her school, and serves as a chief advisor to the appropriate assigned Associate/Assistant Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration, budget, and program implementation in his/her school. 2. Works with staff and patrons to determine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school.Principals BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: (Continued) 3. Implements the process whereby school-level educational programs needs are identified. Informs the appropriate Associate/Assistant Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. 4. Serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the appropriate Associate/Assistant Superintendent. 5. Oversees the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. Works with supervisory and building staff to make the necessary program changes. 7. Assumes responsibility for conducting the performance evaluation of all personnel assigned to his/her building. 8. Assumes responsibility for all record keeping and other administrative tasks. EVALUATION\nPerformance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with the provisions of the Board's policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIP\nRepoirts to the Deputy Superintendent. $ SALARY AND TERMS\n37-0003 Salary Schedule - An Eleven (11) Month Contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance, and Benefits APPLICATION DEADLINE\nMay 19, 1994, or any time later until satisfactory applicants are recommended and approved. SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INOUITY TO\nDr. Richard E. Hurley Director of itftiian Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201Principals NOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.) fm PLEASE POST 'A LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL.DI STRICT' 810 WEST MARKHAM-^STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 May 10, ^994. sGE^VED PLEASE POSjgJI 7 1994 Office of Dessgregaficn Mcni }. The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1994-95 school year\nPOSITION\nPrincipal - J.A. Fair High School QUALIFICATIONS\n1. At least five (5) years experience as a teacher and/or administrator. 2. A master's degree or higher, with eligibility for an approved Deficiency Removal Plan for Arkansas Certification as a Secondary Principal. 3. Evidence of strong organizational skills. 4. Knowledge of curriculum development and successful teaching methods. 5. Demonstrates the conviction that all students can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 6. Evidence of strong experience in dealing with student problems. ! 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement. 8. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. note\nAPPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW, BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. Assumes responsibility for management of his/her school, and serves as chief advisor to the Deputy Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration and program implementation in that school. 2. serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the Deputy Superintendent.Principal BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n(Continued) 3. Implements the process whereby school-level educational program needs are identified. Alerts the Deputy Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. 4. Works with staff and patrons to determine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school. 5. Oversees the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. Seeks the necessary consultative and logistical support to assure effective educational program implementation. 7. Monitors program implementation in his/her school. 8. Works with supervisory and building staff to make the necessary program changes. 9. Assumes responsibility for conducting the performance evaluation of the personnel assigned to his/her building. 10. Assumes responsibility for encouraging and involving community, staff, and where appropriate, students in decision making about educational program development and implementation at the building level. 11. Assumes responsibility for all record keeping and other administrative tasks. ! ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS\nReports to the Deputy Superintendent SALARY AND TERMS\nADMCER-06 - $43,548 - $65,676 - A Twelve (12) Month Position, plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package EVALUATION\nPerformance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Board's policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS\nMay 19, 1994, or any time later until satisfactory applicants are recommended and approved.Principal SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO\nDr. Richard E. Hurley Human Resources Department Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. 'the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices. s^SD PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 JUL 7 1594 PLEASE POST May 10, 1994 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following positions for the 1994-95 school year\nPOSITIONS\nPrincipals - (1) Forest Hgts. Jr. (1) Cloverdale Jr. (1) Mabelvale Jr. (1) Southwest Jr. QUALIFICATIONS\n1. At least five (5) years experience as a teacher and/or administrator. 2. 3. A master's degree or higher, with eligibility for an approved Deficiency Removal Plan for Arkansas Certification as a Secondary Principal. Evidence of strong organizational skills. 4. Knowledge of curriculum development and successful teaching methods. 5. Demonstrates the conviction that all students can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 6. Evidence of strong experience with parent and staff problems. ! 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement. 8. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. NOTE\nAPPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EDIVENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Assumes responsibility for management of his/her school, and serves as chief advisor to the Deputy Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration and program implementation in that school. 2. Serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the Deputy Superintendent.Principals BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: (Continued) 3. 4. 5. Implements the process whereby school-level educational program needs are identified. Alerts the Deputy Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. Works with staff and patrons to deteirmine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school. Oversees the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. 7. 8. Seeks the necessary consultative and logistical support to assure effective educational program implementation. Monitors program implementation in his/her school. Works with supervisory and building staff to make the necessary program changes. 9. 10. 11. Assumes responsibility for conducting the performance evaluation of the personnel assigned to his/her building. Assumes responsibility for encouraging and involving community, staff, and where appropriate, students in decision making about educational program development and implementation at the building level. Assumes responsibility for all record keeping and other administrative tasks. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS\nReports to the Deputy Superintendent SALARY AND TERMS: ADMCER-06- $43,548 - $65,676 - A Twelve (12) Month Position, plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package. EVALUATION\nPerformance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Board's policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS\nMay 19, 1994, or any time later until satisfactory applicants are recommended and approved.Principals SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO\nDr. Richard E. Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITIONS MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.t PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET JUL 7 1994 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 7220T s Ci June 1, 1994 i / i i/,4, I The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following positions for the 1994-95 school year\nPOSITIONS\nPrincipals - Junior High Schools QUALIFICATIONS\n1. At least five (5) years experience as a teacher and/or administrator. 2. A master's degree or higher, with eligibility for an approved Deficiency Removal Plan for Arkansas Certification as a Secondary Principal. 3. Evidence of strong organizational skills. 4. Knowledge of curriculum development and successful teaching methods. 5. Demonstrates the conviction that all students can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 6. Evidence of strong experience with parent and staff problems. 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement. 3. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. NOTE\nAPPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EDIVENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. Assumes responsibility for management of his/her school, and serves as chief advisor to the Deputy Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration and program implementation in that school. 2. Serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the Deputy Superintendent.Principals BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: (Continued) 3. Implements the process whereby school-level educational program needs are identified. Alerts the Deputy Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. 4. Works with staff and patrons to determine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school. 5. Oversees the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. Seeks the necessary consultative and logistical support to assure effective educational program implementation. 7. Monitors program implementation in his/her school. 8. Works with supervisory and building staff to make the necessary program changes. 9. Assumes responsibility for conducting the perfoirmance evaluation of the personnel assigned to his/her building. 10. Assumes responsibility for encouraging and involving community, staff, and where appropriate, students in decision making about educational program development and implementation at the building level. 11. Assumes responsibility for all record keeping and other administrative tasks. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS\nReports to the Deputy Superintendent SALARY AND TERMS\nADMCER-06- $43,548 - $65,676 - A Twelve (12) Month Position, plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package. EVALUATION\nPerformance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Board's policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS\nJune 10, 1994, or any time later until satisfactory applicants are recommended and approved.Principals SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: Dr. Richard E. Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITIONS MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.u a J -.3 0 JUN ' PLEASE POST 94 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 JUL 7 1994 PLEASE POST Orfice cf DesegregaSon :on!t' June 21, 1994 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1994-95 school year\nPOSITION\nPrincipal - Pulaski Heights Junior High School QUALIFICATIONS: 1. At least five (5) years experience as a teacher and/or administrator. 2. A master's degree or higher, with eligibility for an approved Deficiency Removal Plan for Arkansas Certification as a Secondary Principal. 3. Evidence of strong organizational skills. 4. Knowledge of curriculum development and successful teaching methods. 5. Demonstrates the conviction that all students can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 6. Evidence of strong experience with parent and staff problems. 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement. 8. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. note\nAPPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EDIVENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW, BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. Assumes responsibility for management of his/her school, and serves as chief advisor to the Deputy Superintendent on matters pertaining to administration and program implementation in that school. 2. Serves on such advisory groups and task forces as assigned by the Deputy Superintendent.Principal BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: (Continued) 3. Implements the process whereby school-level educational program needs are identified. Alerts the Deputy Superintendent regarding needed logistical and consultative support in order to accomplish this task. 4. Works with staff and patrons to determine educational program priorities and goals for his/her school. 5. Oversees the development of educational programs and the plan for implementing them on the school level. 6. Seeks the necessary consultative and logistical support to assure effective educational program implementation. 7. Monitors program implementation in his/her school. 8. Works with supervisory and building staff to make the necessary program changes. 9. Assumes responsibility for conducting the performance evaluation of the personnel assigned to his/her building. 10. Assumes responsibility for encouraging and involving community, staff, and where appropriate, students in decision making about educational program development and implementation at the building level. 11. Assumes responsibility for all record keeping and other administrative tasks. ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: Reports to the Deputy Superintendent SALARY AND TERMS: ADMCER-06- $43,548 - $65,676 - A Twelve (12) Month Position, plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package. EVALUATION: Performance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Board's policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS: June 30, 1994, or any time later until satisfactory applicants are recommended and approved.Principal SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO\nDr. Richard E. Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITIONS MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices. s9. Criteria Used to Screen Applicants A. Date/time/place selected to review applicants files. B. Applications are secured from Human Resources. C. Applications are reviewed to verify  Credentials (certification, experience, performance reviews, references, additional training, etc.)  All applications, except one, from assistant principals, principals, and/or specialists with supervisory/technical experience were included in the pool. Given the districts need for experienced leadership, teachers with no administrative experience were excluded. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. JUL 7 J994 3 Most applicants requesting specific schools were scheduled for those interviews. Discussion and review of applications took place over a period of several weeks. Applicants were scheduled to appear before specific interview teams. Attention was given to race and gender, also. Interview schedules were compiled and reviewed by staff. Interview schedules/applications were shared with the Superintendent Interview schedules were finalized for notification of applicants. Applicants were notified of date/time/place that they were to appear before the various interview teams. (Personal telephone calls were made to applicants by administrative assistants for the deputy and assistant superintendents.)Persons responsible for screening applicants: Name Margaret Gremillion Sterling Ingram Estelle Matthis Larry Robertson Position Assistant Superintendent Special Assistant to Deputy Supt Deputy Superintendent Assistant SuperintendentIton #10 from ODK request\nE? 7P1 ?! 0 PARENT GIBBS ELEMENTARY - TEACHER ASSOCIATION JUL 7 1994 RECEIVF!^'^' DssegrC'jation Monjc'\n:? JUN 17 1994 SUPPR OFFiGr June 17, 1994 Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent Little Rock School District HAND DElilVERED 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Principal Selection Process for Gibbs Magnet School Dear Dr. Williams: Again, on behalf of the Committee, I would like to thank you for your time in discussing the selection process with us. think we can all agree that an important component to this I successful functioning of not only an individual school such as Gibbs but of the entire school district is the meaningful and significant involvement of parents and teachers in the decision-making process. As parents and teachers, we observe. on a daily basis, how our schools operate and, therefore. can offer relevant input in the selection of a principal for our school. At the conclusion of our meeting, you indicated that you would review the process and procedures which have taken place to date. You agreed to advise the committee whether or not you would permit us to interview additional candidates for the principal's position. Recognizing that you will be involved in other activities through the end of this week, we ask that you notify us by 2:00 p.m., Monday, June 20, 1994. Although I believe we made it quite apparent during the course of our meeting, I would like to reiterate that our primary concern is with the validity of the procedure by which the next principal of Gibbs is to be determined. Although it has been stated by the administration that this particular procedure had n worked\" in prior applications, it has been our experience that the process in this instance is inherently and fatally flawed.Dr. Henry P. Williams June 17, 1994 Page Two When we initially learned that there would be a vacancy, the Gibbs PTA met and determined that we would like to be involved in the selection process. Subsequently, we undertook efforts to determine what the process would be and what we, the parents and faculty of Gibbs, needed to do in order to become a part of the process. At no time were we ever given specific or accurate information regarding the process and procedures to be employed in the selection of a new principal nor were we told what our role would be. Estelle Matthis, Upon the recommendation of Deputy Superintendent we met and selected a committee to represent Gibbs and drafted communications to the school district requesting involvement in the process. We also requested information regarding the names of applicants for the position but were not provided that information until third party filed freedom of information request. a Upon obtaining this information, the committee met and on June 4, 1994, submitted a list of names of candidates that we wished to interview, a list of questions to be posed to the applicants, and after learning by word of mouth some aspects of the selection procedure, a list of proposed procedures that we wished to be included. This letter was hand delivered to both your office and that of Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent by a member of the Gibbs Committee. However, it is apparent that neither you nor any administration representative on the selection committee ever saw this communique prior to the June 7, 1994 interview session. On June 7, 1994, the parents and faculty of Gibbs posed several questions to the administrative representatives on the selection committee. We asked how the five interviewees were selected and were told that all five had been selected based on their expressed interest in the Gibbs position. by you that that was \"misinformation\". We are now told It was not until the interview session that we were informed as to what the procedure for selection of the principal would be. Both before the interview process and at the conclusion of the interviews. inquired of the administrative representatives whether, we in the event that we were not satisfied with any of the applicants interviewed, could we interview additional applicants. In response to our inquiries, we were told that the answer to our inquiry was unknown but were later told that, yes, if we could not come to a consensus on the applicants to be recommended to you, the process would remain open and we would be able toDr. Henry P. Williams June 17, 1994 Page Three interview additional candidates. During the course of our meeting of June 15, you indicated that your representatives \"misinformed\". were The parent and faculty members of the selection committee also expressed serious reservations about the utilization of the evaluation forms. Our concerns were the lack of prior input into the questions to be posed to the applicants as well as the use the forms would serve in the selection process. We were assured that it would not simply be a matter of tabulating the scores and then selecting the top three candidates based simple mathematics. on There was substantial reluctance on the part of the faculty and parent members of the committee to fill out the forms until we gained assurances from the administration that those forms would not be used as set forth above. At the conclusion of the interview process, the consensus was that we had not interviewed a candidate that we could recommend to the administration for the Gibbs principal position. After lengthy discussions, the group agreed not to submit any names to the administration and that we would request the opportunity to interview additional candidates. Administration representatives insisted that the forms be filled out and that was done only after again receiving assurances that the forms not be used and the scores tabulated to arrive at three candidates based on the highest scores obtained. told that the only reason to fill out those forms was to We were document the fact that the committee had interviewed the five applicants. Additionally, several members of the committee expressly stated that any recommendation to the administration would not be based solely on the evaluation forms as those forms did not accurately reflect an individual's choices. As a general matter, it is difficult to understand how a principal can be selected based solely on a thirty minute interview. Dr. Williams, based on the foregoing, we simply ask that you provide us with an opportunity to interview additional candidates and complete what we believe is an incomplete process. I am, under separate cover, sending a copy of this letter to the individual members of the Little Rock School Board as well as to Judge Susan Webber Wright and Donna Creer of the Magnet Review Committee.1 Dr. Henry P. Williams June 17, 1994 Page Four We look forward to your response. Sincerely, Gibbs Parent-Teacher Principal Selection Committee BY: Easter Tucker Willie Jones Zach Polett Dodie Angulo Ann Cashion Wilhelmina Lewellen Vicki Gonterman ^fred^. Angulo, jt. AFAjr/jc cc: Dr. Katherine Mitchell Shorter College 604 Locust Street North Little Rock, AR 72114 T. Kevin O'Malley Ark. Board of Review Tower Building, Suite 700 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dorsey Jackson 1400 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John A. Riggs, IV J. A. Riggs Tractor Co. P.O. Box 1399 Little Rock, AR 72203Linda Pondexter Fuller Jr. High P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, AR 72216 Patricia Gee 8409 Dowan Drive Little Rock, AR 72209 Oma jacovelli 6622 Gold Court Little Rock, AR 72209 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright U.S. District Judge P.O. Box 3316 Little Rock, AR 72203 Donna Creer Magnet Review Committee 1920 N. Main North Little Rock, AR 72114 3860d11. Summary of the Time Frame Within Which the Process Took Place (include dates of job postings, application deadlines, interview dates, and the like) Position Date of Job Posting Application Deadline Interview Dates Principals of: May 10, 1994 May 19, 1994 Carver Franklin Gibbs Mitchell RightseU Williams June 6, 1994 June 8, 1994 June 7, 1994 June 8, 1994 June 9, 1994 June 7, 1994 Principal: J. A. Fair May 10, 1994 May 19, 1994 June 6, 1994 Principals of: May 10, 1994 May 19, 1994 Cloverdale Forest Heights Southwest June 8, 1994 June 8, 1994 June 9, 1994 JUL 7 1994 Oitice of Cesegrog\n!2i in Monaciing12. Names of Applicants recommended by the Superintendent: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL J. A. Fair High School William Broadnax Cloverdale Junior High Casandra Norman Mason Southwest Junior High School Johnny Neely Forest Heights Jr. High School Dewayne Benage Rightsell Incentive School Sharon Brooks Mitchell Incentive School Faith Donavan Gibbs Magnet School Ed Jackson (.Reassigned) Williams Magnet School Meiry Menking (Reassigned) SCE5VED JUL 1 1994 Oitice of Dssegresafcn MonitoringItem No. 12 of ODM Request LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 JUNE 23, 1994 TO: FROM: D Board of Directors 1. rley, Direjctor of Human Resources THROUGH: Dr. Henry jams? Superintende SUBJECT: Personnel Changes I recommend the approval of the following new staff at the indicated classifications. positions, salaries, and NAME POSITION SCHOOL EFFECT DATE SALARY CLASS* SUAKV William Broadnax Principal J.A. Fair H.S. 7-1-94 ADM12 06-09 EDUOl C.A. 52,865 2,000 900 Cassandra Norman-Mason Principal Cloverdale Jr.High 7-1-94 ADM12 05-09 EDUOl C.A. 48,645 1,500 900 Johnny Neely Principal Southwest Jr. High 7-1-94 ADM12 05-14 EDUOl C.A. 54,469 1,500 900 NAME POSITION SCHOOL EFFECT DATE SALARY CLASS* SMAKY Duane Benage Principal 7-1-94 Forest Hgts. Jr. High ADM12 05-17 EDUOl C.A. 57,962 1,500 900 Sharon Brooks Principal Rightsell Elem. 7-1-94 ADMCER 05-14 EDUOl C.A. 50,669 1,500 900 Faith Donovan Principal MitcheU Elem. 7-1-94 ADMCER 05-09 EDUOl C.A. 45,251 1,500 900 DOES NOT INCLUDE A STEP-INCREASE FOR 1994-95.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 JUNE 23, 1994 TO\nBoard of Directors FROM: Dr, Rii Di^ctor of Human Resources THROUGH: Dr. Henry SUBJECT: Ilia 7t ident Administrative Transfers p The following reassignments of individuals have been completed and are presented for your information. NAME FROM TO Sharon Davis Rightsell Elem. Romine Elem. Lionel Ward Romine Elem. Mabelvale Elem. Julie Davenport Mabelvale Elem. Franklin Elem. Franklin Davis Franklin Elem. Wilson Elem. Gwen Ziegler Wilson Elem. Washington Elem. Karen Buchanan Washington Elem. Henderson Jr. High Dr. Samuel Branch Mitchell Elem. Fair Park Elem. Barbara Means Fair Park Elem. Baseline Elem. Mary Menking Brady Elem. Williams Elem. Ed Jackson Williams Elem. Gibbs Elem. Gayle Bradford Cloverdale Jr. High Mabelvale Jr. High Walter Marshalak Mabelvale Jr. Ehgh Alter. Learning CenterNAME FROM TO Linda Watson Student Hearing Officer J.A. Fair Asst. Principal Othello Faison Alter. Learning Center Coordinator Fed. Program/Grants Leon Adams Fed. Programs/Grants Arts, Music \u0026amp; Technology Mary Jane Cheatham Baseline Elem. Transportation Lavanna Wilson Bale Elem. Hippy /Early ChildhoodItem No. 12 of ODM request: LITRE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS June 10, 1994 TO: Henry P. Williams, Superintendent FROM: LAEsteUe Matthis, Deputy Superintendent ^('''Russ Mayo, Associate Superintendent SUBJECT: Recommendations for Secondary Principals The following applicants were interviewed and the interview team ranked them for consideration in the following order. your SCHOOL NAME RANK J. A. Fair William Broadnax (B/M) Sammy Felton (B/M) Gayle Bradford (W/F) 1st 2nd 3rd Cloverdale Cassandra Mason (B/F) William Broadnax (B/M) 1st 2nd Forest Heights Dewayne Benage (W/M) William Smith (B/M) Johnny Neely (W/M) 1st 2nd 3rd Southwest Johnny Neely (W/M) Cassandra Mason (B/F) Jim Mosby (B/M) 1st 2nd 3rd These decisions represent group consensus. Rating sheets are provided for your review. I am available to discuss, if you deem it necessary.Little Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 June 8, 1994 TO\nFROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Margaret Gremil^^^i^'^sistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Carver Magnet School Principalship Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with the names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Carver interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Diane Barksdale 2. Barbara Anderson *3. Beverly Jones Deborah Black Mitchell /laj Attachment *TieLittle Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 June 8, 1994 TO: FROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Margaret Gremihi^^^sistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Gibbs Magnet School Principalship Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with the names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Gibbs interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Dr. Ed Jackson 2. Barbara Anderson 3. Faith Donovan /laj AttachmentLittle Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 June 8, 1994 TO\nFROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Margaret Gremilli^!^\nf\\kssistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Williams Magnet School Prinripakhip Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with the names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Williams interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Sharon Brooks 2. Dr. Ed Jackson 3. Mary Menking /laj AttachmentLittle Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 June 9, 1994 TO: FROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Larry S. Robertson, Assistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Franklin School Principalship Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with the names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Franldin interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Ada Keown 2. Dr. J. J. Lacey, Jr. 3. JuUe Davenport /laj AttachmentLittle Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 June 8, 1994 TO: FROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Margaret Gremillion, Assistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Mitchell School Principalship Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with e names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Mitchell interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Sharon Brooks 2. Dr. J. J. Lacey, Jr. 3. Faith Donovan /laj AttachmentLittle Rock School District Office of the Assistant Superintendents 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Jxine 9, 1994 TO: FROM: Mrs. Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent Margaret Grerml^i^Sj^i^ssistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Final Candidates for the Rightsell School Principalship Please find attached an applicant tally sheet with the names of the applicant and his/her ratings given by the Rightsell interview team. The three applicants rated highest by the group are: 1. Sharon Brooks 2. Ada Keown 3. Barbara Anderson /laj AttachmentI tan No. 12 - Names of Applicant Pool presented to the ccnmittee: PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Monday, June 6, 1994 - JTArpAlR 2:00 - 2:30 p.ni. - Cassandra Norman-Mason 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Vernon Smith 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - Gayle Bradford 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - William E. Broadnax 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. - Sammy Felton 4:30 - 5:00 p.m. - Linda Watson 5:00 - 5:30 p.m. - William SmithPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Wednesday, June 8, 1994 - CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 8:30 - 9:00 a.nL 9:00 - 9:30 a.ni. 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. 10:00 - 10:30 a.m. 10:30 - 11:00 a.m. - Cassandra Norman-Mason - Linda G. Brown - Florence LePore - William E, Broadnax - WUliam SmithPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Monday, June 6, 1994 CARVER 1:00 - 1:30 p.in. - Jackie Dedmon 1:30 - 2:00. p.m. - Beverly Jones 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. - Barbara Anderson 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Deborah Black Mitchell 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - Dr. J. J. Lacey, Jr. 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - Diane BarksdalePRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Tuesday, June 7, 1994 - GIBBS 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. 10:00 - 10:30 a.m. 10:30 - 11:00 a.m. 11:00 - 11:30 a.m. - Stan Strauss - Faith Donovan - Ada Keown - Barbara Anderson - Ed JacksonPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Tuesday, June 7, 1994 - WILLIAMS MAGNET 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. - Stan Strauss 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. - Faith Donovan 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Mary Menking 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - Barbara Anderson 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - Deborah Black Mitchell 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. - Sharon Brooks 4:30 - 5:00 p.m. - Ed JacksonPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Wednesday, June 8, 1994 - FOREST HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH 1:00 - 1:30 p.m. - Patricia McMurray (1:30 - 2:00 p.m.) - Dewayne Benage 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. - Daniel Whitehorn 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. - Johnny M. Neeley 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Gayle Bradford 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - William Smith 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - James WashingtonPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Thursday, June 9, 1994 - SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH 1:00 - 1:30 p.m. - Daniel Whitehorn 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. - Angela Munns 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. - Mavis Green 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Florence LePore 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - Jim Mosby 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - Cassandra Norman-Mason 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. - Johimy Neely 4:30 - 5:00 p.m. - James WashingtonPRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Wednesday, June 8, 1994 - FRANKtIK 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. - Julie Davenport 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. - Ada Keown - Barbara Anderson 10:00 - 10:30 ajiL 10:30 - 11:00 a.m. - Tab Phillips 11:30 - 12:00 noon - Helen Thomas 12:00 - 12:30 p.m. - Dr. J. J. Lacey, Jr.PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Wednesday, June 8,1994 - ^ITCHELL 1:30 - 2:00 p.m. - Faith Donovan 2:00 - 2:30 p.m. - Sharon Brooks 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. - Jeff Carr 3:00 - 3:30 p.m. - Deborah Black Mitchell 3:30 - 4:00 p.m. - Dr. J. J. Lacey, Jr.PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULE JUNE 1994 Thursday, June 9, 1994 - RIGHTSELL 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. 10:00 - 10:30 a.m. 10:30 - 11:00 a.m. 11:00 - 11:30 a.m. - Ada Keown - Sharon Brooks - Barbara Anderson - Faith Donovan 11:30 - 12:00 noon - Charity Smith 12:00 - 12:30 p.m. - Beverly JonesOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376.6200 Fax (SOI) 371.0100 July 15, 1994 Dr. Bobby Altom Pulaski County Special School District 925 Dixon Road Uttle Rock, AR 72206 Dear Bobby: As you know. Judge Wright has directed ODM to look into the process the little Rock School District used to fill principal positions for the 1994-95 school year. She asked us to pay particular attention to the role parents and the Magnet Reviev/ Committee played in that selection process. We will use our customary monitoring procedures, that is, reviewing documentation and interviewing various individuals, including the MRC members. ?\\lso, before we file our report with the Court, we will give you and others who furnish us information an opportunity to review our findings. In order to proceed with our monitoring, we need certain documents and other information from the MRC, much of which relates to the content of your June 27, 1994 letter to the Court. Please forward the information on the attached list by 5:00 p.m., July 22,1994. In the near future, well be contacting you and the other MRC members to arrange a time for short interviews. Thank you for your assistance. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely yours. Enc. Provide the following information to ODM by 5:00 p.m., July 22, 1994: 1. The date(s) the MRC reviewed the procedures the LRSD used in recommending staffing assignments for magnet school principal vacancies, (ref: June 27, 1994 letter to the Court) 2. 3. 4. A list of the MRC members who participated in each review session. The minutes of all review sessions. A copy of the procedures which were \"previously presented to the MRC with reference to original magnet school principal positions\"\nindicate the date the MRC received these procedures\nindicate the date they were disseminated to each Committee member, (ref: June 27, 1994 letter to e Court) 5. The date(s) and names of the MRC members who participated in identifying the \"appropriate action\" the MRC has determined it will take to ensure that the LRSD administration fulfills its obligation to follow the Courts Order for future staffing changes in the original magnet schools. Provide minutes of that meeting, (ref: June 27, 1994 letter to the Court) 6. The minutes from all other MRC meetings in which the principal selection process was considered in any way. Indicate those who were present at those meetings. 7. The date(s) and copies of correspondence through which the MRC learned of each impending principal vacancy in a magnet school for the 1994-95 school year. 8. For each of the following, a copy of the written information, e date that information was committed to writing, and the date it was disseminated to all Committee members: a. The written procedures that guide the MRC in relation to selection principals of the magnet schools. b. The written MRC policy or guidelines about using interview committees in selecting magnet school principals. c. The written annual timeline the MRC follows in relation to principal selections. d. Any written guidelines, suggestions, or criteria the MRC may have established regarding principal qualifications, characteristics, experience, or other criteria especially as it relates to the individual theme, programmatic emphasis, or other unique aspect of the individual magnet school community at each of the magnet schools. 9. Copies of any patron or staff letters the MRC has received regarding the most recent principal selection process.r 1 TQ 10 C UI *\"\"*1  X LU O (n (fi LU S OF rROf*! / CODE\n^Bn il\u0026lt;l mMlI SXTEHStON^ u. A ii jPCTURNED cZl, 1 H W1 J^AtL BACK I I A\u0026lt; Wl call AGAIM ' AMPAD NO. 23-176-400 SETS B i SIGN 4\n/'  IV -.tl.H .I 1.1,',' PHONED !^ANT^ Wvou O WAS w NO. 23-376-200 SETS ^1 f s I'-r IS lig II I?? i^ v / [T I c I I A h- nt f /J 0 ^c\u0026gt; Tfrom the class room of JbdttD^ JJL 15, R'?'/. 'J Ji unAI V\u0026gt;\u0026lt;- 6L^teL, . ) Ozark Folk Center Old Time Print Shop LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JUL 1 9 1994 May 26, 1994 Office of Desfe^esaSiOft M\u0026amp;frfWfng TO: FROM: Forest Height Jr. High School Principal Interview Committee Members X ' IH C Estelle Matthis, Deputy Superintendent SUBJECT: Principal Interviews Thank you for accepting our invitation to participate in the selection process for the principal of Forest Heights Jr. High School for the 1994-95 school year. The interviews will be held in the Little Rock School District Board Room, 810 West Markham Street, on June 8, 1994, from 1 to 4 p.m. Your assistance and cooperation are appreciated.raw Cfiris \u0026amp; Denise Kornegay 11 0(iata Court Littk Kpcii, AIK 72209 - r~- IT9S (992 \u0026lt;(/ / PM ft) \u0026gt; 18 Jl'L 'V /S3A 29l-^ (* Date: July 21, 1994 From: Melissa To: Bill MEMORANDUM Subject: Tasking Updates Horace is inundated with tasks, so 1 agreed to compile the updates for the tasking. Please substitute the following three items for old #18: Summarize interviews by school 7/21-7/ 27,20% complete, MP, HS, MG Summarize/note trends 7/27-7/29, 0%, MP. MG, HS Pull together summaries 7/27, 0%, MP, MG, HS Also add: Transcript review for directives 7/20-7/24, 20%, MP, MG, HS, BMOO, BMOR Court Order directives 7/21-7/24, PR Ive also updated the % complete in several catergories. I based my percentages on my estimate for the close of work 7/21/94.e. Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376.6200 Fax (501) 371.0100 Date: August 1, 1994 To: Bobby Altom From: in Brown Subject Administrative racial balance at Gibbs Thanks so much for taking the time to call me from your conference meeting this morning. 1 will be away from the office in planning sessions until Wednesday afternoon, so I did not want to wait until then to bring my concern about Gibbs to your attention. Attached is the excerpt from Judge Wrights November 2, 1992 order that I referred to this morning. It deals with the racial balance of the principal and assistant principal at Gibbs, an issue which was raised before the Court when the district appointed Linda White as assistant principal. As you recall, that appointment meant that the two top administrators at Gibbs were both white. Last Thursday, Dr. Williams announced that he had appointed Dr. Maijorie Bassa, who is black, as the new Gibbs principal. Because the schools assistant principal is also black, the appointment has created tlie same predicament which we faced two years ago. I understand that, in the recent re-interviews at Gibbs, the interview committees top candidate was white. If that is indeed the case, the LRSD apparently could have selected a white principal, resulting in a racially balanced administrative team at Gibbs. The district has apparently acted in disregard of the Courts 1992 order. Please immediately bring this matter to the attention of Dr. Williams so he may move quickly to address it. In resolving this dilemma, I believe it would counter to the best interests of the school for the district to replace Gibbs assistance principal with a white just to attain racial balance\nsuch a move would leave the school with two new top administrators, instead of only one. Im particularly distressed that this situation has arisen right on the heels of the recent unpleasantness regarding the selection of magnet school principals. Once again, I must question the extent to which the LRSD consulted with the MRC about appointing a new magnet principal. The MRC is well aware of the Courts orders regarding racial balance at the magnet schools\nif the LRSD had consulted the MRC about this most recent principal selection, the Committee surely would have reminded the LRSD to act in accordance with Court directives and the spirit of the desegregation plans. Thank you for attending to this matter. 111 be in touch with you soon. Project Update\nInquiry Into LRSD Principal Hiring Process August 18,1994 Surveys Parent, administrator, and Magnet Review Committee surveys have all been completed. We were able to successfully survey 65% (13 of 20) of all parents, 70% (16 of 23) of teachers, 82% (9 of 11) administrators, and all seven members of the Magnet Review Committee. Writing Process All individual parent, administrator, and MRC interviews were summarized and information categorized according to topics. For example, responses to the parent survey question \"How were you selected to be a member of the interview committee?\" were summarized and placed under the topic \"Committee Selection Process\". Hopefully, weve been able to provide a composite of responses which accurately reflects the overall essence of the individual responses. The staff edited the draft copy of the report which will be used for todays feedback sessions mainly for clarity and format. Organization Although ODM will file a single report with the Court, each part of the report - Parent Responses, Administrators Responses, and the Role of the MRC, does stand alone. The ODM Summary of Findings and Recommendations will be the section of the report which will pull all of the information together. That section still must be written. Feedback Sessions ODM will conduct feedback sessions today for parents and teachers, LRSD administrators, and MRC. The schedule is as follows: Magnet Review Committee - 10:00 am at the ODM office LRSD Administrators - 2:00 pm at the ODM office Parents and Teachers - 5:30 pm at the Little Rock Main Library, Sth and Louisiana The purpose of the sessions is to allow the participants in the surveys an opportunity to read the report draft and determine whether it is both accurate and still closely reflects in some way their individual perspectives. We must make sure that the parent/teacher session does not degenerate into a gripe session about the district or the ultimate choices made at their individual schools. We must also make sure that participants in each session realize that we are not there to gather further data for the report. We are already dealing with a specific \"universe\" of information - the responses they provided during the individual interviews. It is important that we inform each group from the start that we will take note of their comments, but that does not mean that an addition or deletion to the report will be made. We will go back to the original surveys to judge the validity of any recommendations. Feedback Session Agenda Welcome, Purpose, and Introductions (Ann) Review of Survey Process and Compilation of Responses (Horace) Explanation of the Feedback Session Process (Margie) Reading/Comment (small groups or individuals - monitors circulate) Participants may leave after they have read and given feedback Project Schedule August 18 - Feedback Sessions August 19 - Verify and incorporate feedback session changes/Staff meeting re: ODM conclusions and recommendations August 22-23 - Edit report draft August 25 - Print final report August 26 - File report with the CourtF.Y.I. I I Date: B^^nn Bill \u0026gt;- S 13^ Bob Horace l^rgie Melissa :^i Polly  If Return to: Linda ILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CORRECTED GCDA REGULATION TO BE INSERTED IN AGENDA FOR AUGUST 25, 1994 EPS CODE: GCDA - Regulation SELECTION OF APPLICANTS SCHOOL PRINCIPALS Persons desiring employment as a School Principal shall file an application in writing (Resxune, letter of intent, or vitae initial contact. Li___i___ xOxws will then be provided for applicants not currently employed with Little Rock School District.) xOxiuS District application District administration officials will for acceptability. Taken into certification. and references. Deffuty screen the applicants Taken into consideration an experience, education, performance reviews. are The Deputy Superintendent and/or the Assistant Superintendent(s) will prepare a list of interview questions, which may include suggestions from parents and committee members, to be used in the interview process. Superintendent the The Human Resources Director will review the questions for appropriateness regarding legal issues (ie\nE.E.C Affirmative Action, Americans with Disability Act, E.E.O., etc.) interview committee will be selected/appointed. as Three Two Three (3) (2) (3) Parents/Patrons Teachers Administration Representatives Mote:1 Note:2 Note:3 1. 2. The Parent/Patrons representatives will be selected by a process: designated by the PTA president of the of the affected school. a process: 3. The teacher(s) representatives shall be from the affected school and appointed by the Administration. The Superintendent (in consultation with appropriate staff - Assistant Deputy (in Supervisors, and Principals) r Administration representatives. Superintendents, may designate the *NOTE: The committee's composition shall be balanced, as nearly as possible, by race and gender.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE\nGCDA Regulation 6. The interview committee shall meet to inteirview and recommend candidates. The interview committee will be provided folders containing the following: 1) An interview schedule 2) 3) 4) The approved interview questions An approved candidate rating form The applicant's application materials 7. The interview committee shall interview xixc xnvexyxew committee shall interview the applicants and complete the ratings sheet. The committee, through consensus, will agree upon and sxibmit a recommendation of the top three (3) candidates to the Superintendent. Although the applicants are rated, the ratings are only for use in reaching consensus and need not be the sole basis for selecting the recommended candidates.) (Note: 8. The Superintendent shall review the recommendations of the Interview Committee and select the applicant to be submitted for Board approval. The Superintendent may at his/her option, reject each of the three (3) applicants and require that the committee reconvene to determine new recommendations. 9. Once the Superintendent has selected an acceptable applicant, he/she will submit that individual's name to the Board of D^^sctors for approval. If the applicant is currently serving  PJ^incipal, the Superintendent may reassign the Principal and advise the Board of the lateral transfer. 10. salary. approved, the candidate shall receive a contract which details his salary, pay grade, and other pertinent information.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 Date: September 6, 1994 To: Parents and School Staff From: .nn Brown. Monitor Subject: ODM Report on Involvement in the Principal Selection Process Enclosed is your copy of the report we were able to compile because of your help. This document was filed today with the Court and is now a part of the official case record. All of us at ODM are very grateful to you for the time you spent with us, answering questions and sharing your experiences and perspectives as a member of an mter\\'iew committee. Your sincere interest in finding the best principals for the schools was very apparent, and we thank you for having volunteered to help the Little Rock School District continually improve its service to children. If you have questions or comments on any aspect of this report, please do not hesitare to call me or any other ODM staff member at 376-6200. We are always interested in your thoughts. Thank you very much for your help.Magnet Review Committee 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Donna Grady Creer Executive Director (501) 75H-0IG6 May 5, 1995 UY 3 r.. i555 Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Williams: During the 1994-95 school year, the Magnet Review Committee (MRC) discussed at several of its meetings the staffing procedure for principals of the original magnet schools. This was done in an effort to devise a method or methods by which the MRC and the Little Rock School District (LRSD) could ensure that the requirements of Judge Wright's Court Order dated November 5, 1992 are met. That Order states, \"In the future, the LRSD must consult the MRC and must seek Court permission prior to making any staffing changes in the magnet schools.\" To this end, the MRC and LRSD agreed to include on the MRC's regular meeting agenda a recurrent item. \"LRSD Personnel Update.\" In addition, you and the LRSD representative to the MRC worked diligently with the full body of the MRC to address several issues affecting magnet school staffing. The MRC's participation in the make-up, selection, and role of the interview team received considerable discussion. The issue of the MRC's involvement in the principal selection process was formally addressed by the MRC during its April 25, 1995 meeting. The MRC unanimously agreed by formal motion and vote to request that Donna Grady Creer, MRC Executive Director, become a non-voting/ex-officio member of the team(s) interviewing individual candidates for the position of magnet school principal. The MRC believes that honoring this request would be an important component of the collaborative effort of the LRSD and the MRC to select principals for the original magnet schools. The request satisfies two key considerations. First, the LRSD continues to have responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the magnet schools. Second, the MRC is able to support the integrity of the selection process through an active consultative role. Th\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_942","title":"Recruitment and salary schedule, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/2010"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","North Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational statistics","Education--Finance","School employees","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Recruitment and salary schedule, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/942"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["98 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1475","title":"\"Review of Law and Social Change,\" New York University","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","United States, New York, Erie County, Buffalo, 42.88645, -78.87837"],"dcterms_creator":["New York University"],"dc_date":["1989/1990"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Evaluation","Education","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School boards","School improvement programs","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["\"Review of Law and Social Change,\" New York University"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1475"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["26 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_698","title":"Settlement plan","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/1995"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","Student assistance programs","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Settlement plan"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/698"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["160 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nService Master Management Services, an Illinois company hired to supervise Little Rock School District's maintenance and custodial staff.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1989 SETTLEMENT PLAN \u0026amp; MAY SUBMISSION BRIEF summaryLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SETTLEMENT PLAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION (Pages 5-26) BACKGROUND \u0026amp; PHILOSOPHY Statistics show that children who are provided with early childhood education have greater opportunities which enable them to succeed in the future. While the enrollment for early education programs continues to increase, there are many families who do not have access to affordable and accessible early childhood education. In order to combat this problem the LRSD proposes to expand existing and develop new early childhood education programs. The LRSD's plan is comprised of the following programs: HIPPY  I  ) ' .r . J - Aids train mothers to teach their four and five year old children through home-based curriculum /\u0026gt; - LRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD will collaborate and coordinate implementation II ,A' - HIPPY \u0026amp; Four Year Old Program will collaborate with regard to parental involvement and teacher training i r EVALUATION - Early Prevention School Failure Model conducted on participants at Kindergarten (pre and post tests) - Standardized achievement test at the end of the 3rd grade MAY SUBMISSION - Addition of \"similar model\" for evaluation at kindergarten - Deletion of \"pre and post tests\" and replaces with \"as they enter and exit kindergarten\" TIMELINES - HIPPY is a year round program - The following should be in place: - 14 Aids Selected and Trained - Families Recruited and TrainedHIPPY MAY SUBMISSION - Addition \"the LRSD's HIPPY Program depends on external funding. ... cannot be continued at present levels without continued receipt of JTPA and Chapter 2 funds.\" CONTACT: Miarian Shead at 324-2266 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM - High Scope Curriculum which emphasizes active learning - High Scope Curriculum complements HIPPY Curriculum MAY SUBMISSION - Addition to curriculum of \"or similar curriculum.\" - LRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD will collaborate on parental involvement, inservice and training for teachers EVALUATION - Inservice evaluation will be summarized - Test data will be analyzed MAY SUBMISSION - Deletes \"test data\" and replaces with \"student assignment data\" TIMELINES - Program implemented in 3 incentive schools in 1988-89 school year - Program implemented in other incentive schools in 1989-90 school year - Program to be implemented in all elementary schools by 1993-94 school year NOTE WORDING IN PLAN BUT DELETED IN MAY SUBMISSION: \"Scope of this program may be altered, affected and/or enhanced by the proposed assignment and construction proposals made in this plan.\"MAY SUBMISSION - Deleted program to be implemented in other incentive schools by by the 1989-90 school year and replaced with \"By the 1991-92 school year the program will be implemented in the schools listed below: Badgett Frankl in Garland * Ish Mitchell * Rightsell * Rockefeller * Romine Stephens * Washington Woodruff\" * Incentive Schools - Deleted \"all schools in the district will implement the four year old Program by 1993-94 school year and replaced with \"A long range implementation plan will be developed for additional four year old program...as a means to meet the needs of disadvantaged students and desegregate schools that are difficult to desegregate. The long range plan will address demographic, instructional, structural needs.\" \u0026lt; ! NOTE: Stay Order requires plan to be submitted by September 30, 1991 CONTACT: Pat Price at 324-2015 CITY WIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION The purposes of the city wide early education is to provide: - Parenting education to mothers and fathers, family health care and nutritional guidance - Quality child-care arrangements for poor parents stressing social development and school readiness - Quality preschool program for disadvantaged three to five year old chiIdren The plan then goes onto discuss components of quality programing, including MAY SUBMISSION Deletes this entire section of the plan and rewrites this section in its enti rety. Of particular concern is the deletion of the components of quality programing and the insertion of a description of the Head Start, Model Cities and LRSD programs. The stipulation dated.7/2/91 rationalizes the deletion of same staffing patterns, teacher qualifications, and the same comprehensive services because \"the plan is in conflict with some of the practices and policies of the Headstart and Model Cities programs.\" The May Plan inserts areas for cooperation between the three programs including parent involvement, staff development, student referrals, and information on student assignment process for kindergarten. In addition, the program purposes are kept in tact, except the May Plan deletes \"family health care and nutritional guidance.\" Finally, the May Plan deleted all the timelines for implementation of city wide comprehensive early childhood program for LR and did not insert any new timelines. TIMELINES - By September 1990 the initial phase of program should be implemented. - By September 1993 LRSD \u0026amp; other agencies should have implemented a comprehensive and consistent early childhood education program for children in LR. - By October 1993 80% of disadvantaged eligible students should be enrolled in early childhood education programs. - By September 1994 pre-screening data at the beginning of the school year will indicate a 75% reduction in the number of children identified as moderate to high risk. ROCKEFELLER EARLY CHILDHOOD MAGNET (MAY SUBMISSION ONLY) - Early childhood education for children ages six weeks to four years old / - Early Childhood Education Demonstration Magnet between LRSD and area colleges to: - train college students in early education - pilot innovative educational approaches for young children - provide assistance in planning and implementation - Three year old student may continue into the four year old program - Siblings of children in program receive preference for Rockefeller assignmentROCKEFELLER EARLY CHILDHOOD MAGNET - Explore year-round program for children from infancy to sixth grade NOTE: Did Not Find Any Timeline Sheets For Early Childhood Magnet! SPECIAL PROGRAMS (Pages 27-39) JTPA SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM -Six week program JTPA eligible students who work either part or full time Students are tested to determine if remediation is needed in math and/or reading, if needed remediation is provided - Increase the number of student participants NO CONTROL OVER THIS - FEDS! - Allow \"any student\" (non-eligible JTPA students) to participate in remediation who needs assistance ! MAY SUBMISSION - Deletes \"any student\" and provides remediation only for JTPA certified/eligible students - Counseling Staff increased by two (1 male \u0026amp; 1 female) and psychologist contracted to help students with serious problems - College students or college bound seniors who shall be hired as as instructional aids - Clerical aids to be added to the program I EVALUATION - Pre \u0026amp; Post Test of Adult Basic Education MAY SUBMISSION - Deleted evaluation mechanism and did not replace TIMELINES - By 1993-94 school year \"increase to 350 students who will show significant grow gains as a result of their participation.\" NOTE: PROGRAM CURRENTLY SERVING 300-350 STUDENTS LRSD NO CONTROL OVER INCREASE -FEDS CONTROL! HOW MEASURE?? - NO SPECIFIC TIMELINES! JTPA ASSET PROGRAM - Peer tutoring by JTPA certified students who work under the supervision of certified teachers n NOTE: ,+z p LRSD IS NOT DOING THIS PROGRAM WITH JTPA \u0026amp; WAS NOT DOING THIS PROGRAM IN DECEMBER OF 1990 WHEN THEY REPRESENTED TO THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT THAT THEY WERE!!! EVALUATION - Compare students receiving tutoring assistance with other students in areas of standardized test results, academic performance based on nine week grade reports, absentee records, drop-outs, follow-up reports and parental reinforcement activities NOTE: NO TIMELINE FOR EVALUATION - WHO? WHEN? TIMELINES - By 1988-89 school year program to be implemented in 4 junior high schools and revise program to include non-certified JTPA student tutors - By 1993-94 school year program available to all \"at risk junior high populations and high school students at accessible sites, students will show improvement, tutors will increase their opportunities for future employment MAY SUBMISSION Inserts \"Programs and individual components will be continued only if JTPA funding is available.\" - Deletes all timeline sheets but leaves the narrative NEW FUTURES HOMEWORK CENTERS \u0026amp; HOMEWORK TELEPHONE HOTLINE - Homework Centers in selected junior high schools - Homework Hotline in areas of English, math, science and social studies MAY SUBMISSION - Deleted Homework Hotline TIMELINE - Begin implementation 1988-89 school year (funded by business community)SCHOOL OPERATIONS (Pages 39-63) - Division of Schools will be responsible for monitoring and implementing the following aspects of LRSD's desegregation plan: - Organizational structure - Discipline - Guidance/Counseling - Internal integration - Extracurricular activities - Evaluation/Testing - Staffing - Planning/Implementation - Specific goals and timelines follow MAY SUBMISSION - Deletes Division of schools and the above aspects of the deseg plan Inserts \"LRSD Office of Desegregation\" will be responsible for moni tori ng - Revision of goals and timelines PROGRAM FOR ACCELERATED LEARNING/PALS (Pages 64-77) - Remediation for students grades K-12, with emphasis in reading and math at the elementary level \u0026amp; English, reading, science, social studies and math at the secondary level - Technology assisted instruction (computers, VCR's etc...) - Goal for student to attend computer lab for at least 70 minutes a week (35 minutes in reading and math) with assistance from a non-certified instructional aid - Develop a profile on elementary students that identifies their strengths and weaknesses \u0026amp; develop an improvement plan with parents which provides timelines for performance/achievement to be assessed - Provide a transitional program for secondary students who need assistance to function effectively in the regular classroom \u0026amp; develop a profile, etc., (see above) - Utilize multi-cultural, interdisciplinary, language-based, individualized instruction MAY SUBMISSION - Deletes PAL program and inserts remediation programs - Merges plan goals for elementary and secondary students \u0026amp; inserts that schools will remediate in areas in which the student has failed - Deletes remediation for reading, social studies and science!!EVALUATION - Improvement Plan, parents are provided with written information on their child's progress in meeting the performance goals of their plan - Evaluation Design and Checklist already developed TIMELINES - Implementation to begin in Fall 1988 - Cannot read timetables!! GIFTED EDUCATION (Pages 78-83) - Subject based instruction for grades K-12 based on ADE's standards - Collaboration with district in areas of curriculum, staff development and research and administration - Placement based on superior intellectual and creative ability ... \"neither criterion shall be used if the result is disparate impact upon either racial group within the district.\" - Special attention to identify and place students from low and middle socio-economic levels MAY SUBMISSION - Deletes subject based \u0026amp; inserts services - Adds attention to identify and place \"minority children I ' (A TIMELINES - Research administration of program to begin November 1988 - Investigate tri-district model for socio-economically deprived students to begin November 1990 - Cannot read other timelines! MULTI-ETHNIC CURRICULUM (Pages 84-99) - Integrate in subject areas, materials, libraries, bulletin boards, assemblies, etc...AN EVENT OR A THING NOT A PROCESS! - Collaboration for three districts in developing and implementing curriculum, studies fai rs, in-service training and access to higher educational TIMELINES FOR MULTI-ETHNIC CURRICULUM - By September 1989 ready for pre-school - grade 6 - By September 1990 ready for grades 7-12 - By September 1991 Review/Revision cycle for pre-school serve as a model for all three districts 12 to EVALUATION - Each building principal responsible - Section on multi-ethnic curriculum added to monitoring checklist MAY SUBMISSION - Deletion \"ethnic\" replaced with \"cultural\" - Added Speaker's Bureau to develop and promoted a better understanding of multi-cultural education in schools and community - Deleted timeline for curriculum to be ready for pre-school - grade 6 - Revised timeline for curriculum to be ready for grades 7-12 from 1990 to 1993 - Deleted monitoring checklist CONTENT AREA PROGRAMS (Pages 101 -108) - Ensure equality and excellence in curriculum \u0026amp; programs in the following: - Instructional methodology - Teacher/student interaction - Muiti-cultural materials - Textbooks w/ no race or gender bias - Organization instruction - Special activities Inservice - Staffing - Objective non-discriminatory criteria for student placement in advanced classed TIMELINES - Implement and incorporate organizational equity practices by Fall 89 \u0026amp; 90 MAY SUBMISSION - This section is revised and merged with multi-cultural curriculumFOCUSED ACTIVITIES K-6 (Pages 108-115) - Elementary schools to have a sound \u0026amp; strong education program with developed focused activities utilizing parent and community involvement - Elementary Academies (non-incentive \u0026amp; non-interdistrict) will receive an annual allocation for implementing focused activity for year which should focus on: 1) Promoting the school as a \"community of learning\" among parents, staff and students 2) Provide enrichment opportunities at the building level 3) Ensure equitable opportunities for participation - Collaboration with PCSSD in implementation of focused activities, curriculum and achieving greater racial balance \u0026amp; agreement that only magnets and incentive schools will have themes TIMELINES - By 1994 academy elementary schools will all have focused activities which will be integrated into the core curriculum, parental, staff and student involvement, academic performance at or above grade level for each student EVALUATION - Principals will appoint an activities coordinator and steering committee to develop and implement and evaluate planned activities - End of school year coordinator will include focused activities in a district wide report MAY SUBMISSION - Deletion of \"academies\" and insert \"area schools\" \u0026amp; deleted \"K-6\" - Deletion of themes for \"incentive\" and insert \"interdistrict\" schools - Addition of Academic Progress Incentive Grant Program whereby each area school will be able to apply for $75k over a 3 yr period to improve academic achievement of all students by reducing academic achievement di sparity - Deleted all timeline sheet and target date of 1994 in narrative - Deleted that academic performance of every student will be at or above grade levelPARKVIEWMAGNET SCHOOL (Pages 116-125) - Fine Arts Magnet and propose to phase in over a 3 yr period a science and math magnet for students graduating from Mann - Contains specific course offerings and new courses - Staff development (curriculum and inservice) - Parental involvement (sign contract) - Space needed for a research writing lab MAY SUBMISSION - Deleted specifics of the 3 year phase in of the science and math magnet - Deleted Russian language course (FAMOUS KNOWN BY ALL LOCAL PAPERS!) - Deleted staff development and lab facilities McClellan community school (may submission only) - Develop as a center to meet the needs of the community - During 1990-91 school year a bi racial planning committee began to worked with consultants to determine how to best utilize the school - Committee will report their progress and recommendations to the LRSD \u0026amp; ODM RECRUITMENT OF PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS (Pages 125-126) - PTA's and parent recruiters will form strategies to recruit private school students back to the public schools - Efforts to be coordinated with Magnet Review Committee MAY SUBMISSION - Deleted coordination with Magnet Committee and inserted that the district will assess the effectiveness of recruitment on an annual basis and discuss with parties before seeking court approved alternative strategies FEDERAL PROGRAMS (Page 127) - LRSD will work with SDE to seek federal funding MAY SUBMISSION - Deletion of working with SDE, LRSD will identify and applyFecruary 22, 1991 RICIIVID FEB 25 1991 Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 'J. S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dear Judge Wright\nIn reading the opinion of the Eight.h Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the LRSD Case, I noticed that on page 28 it states that \"Moreover, the state agreed to lend LRSD up to 520,000,000 over the next ten years, the loans to be forgiven if by December 21, 2000, the existing gap in achievement between black and white pupila in LRSD has been reduced to 10 per cent. \u0026gt;1 Prevision Six on page 25 of the Pulaski County School Desegregation Casa Settlement Agreement of March 1989, stipulates that \"if at any time between the date of this agreement and December 31, 2000 the composite scores of LRSD black students (excluding special education students) on a standardized test agreed upon by the State and the LRSD are 90% or greater of the composite scores of LRSD white students (excluding special education students), the escrowed funds will be paid to LRSD and any outstanding loans will be forgiven. II There is a difference between these two statements. As an example, if the composite score of white students is at the 70th Percentile, according to the Eighth circuit statement, black students would have to score at the 60th Percentile in order the loan to be forgiven. According to the Settlement Agreement, sy would have to score at the 63rd Percentile because ^0% of iS 62. Did rhe ighth Circuit change the stated requirement of the Settlement Agreement? LRSD senior administrators are using the 1C figure instead of the \"90% of\" it is. of course, to their advantage. Settlement requirement because Which is correct? Since the State of Arkansas and the other school districts in this state have a stake in the 520,000,000, I think it would be equitable if 8 Settlement Agreement provisions are strictly enforced by the Court. Your cooperation in making a public statement regarding this ts'\ne will be greatly appreciated. .are. A Axton co: Dr. - con Elliot Arka.-.eas Department of Education1 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AJl-. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. f\nle9 U.S. DiSTrfcr ccvnT I I\nkaxsas 91 JUL25 PM Us 33 CAaL E, i' 1 CLERK ipSTiEE. vir. LLtr I DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS STIPULATION REGARDING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND INTERDISTRICT PLAN MODIFICATIONS The undersigned parties agree and stipulate as follows: The Little Rock School District Proposed Desegregation Plan (May 1991 Plan) was filed in the District Court on May 1, 1991, with the agreement of all of the parties. except on a few specific points, the Knight Intervenors. 1 The May 1991 Plan contains certain changes from the Little Rock School District Proposed Desegregation Plan which was submitted to the District Court in January and March of 1989 (1989 Plans or settlement plans). Some of those proposed changes are described in the Memorandum and Order of the District Court filed June 21, 1991. An explanation of the changes noted by the District Court in that Order was provided in a Stipulation of Facts filed July 2, 1991. See LRCTA Objections filed 5/1/91 and Amended 5/3/91. be noted that the LRCTA Objections are directed toward LRSD's implementation of the 1989 settlement plana and not to differences It must between the settlement plans and the May 1991 plan. *5^ G BiI 2. 9 In a Memorandum and Order filed July 15, 1991, the District Court noted other differences between the settlement plans and the plan agreed to by the parties and submitted to the District Court on May 1, 1991, and refused to reconsider its Order of June I 21 rejecting the May 1991 Plan, The District Court said, however. that \"the merits of transitional revisions will be considered more fully at a hearing subsequent to the parties' compliance with the terms of the June 21 Order\". Memorandum and Order filed July 15, 1991, The purpose of this Stipulation is to provide in advance of that hearing an explanation of the differences between the settlement plans and the May 1991 Plan and to show the basis of the parties' agreement to those changes. The differences which were expanded in the July 2, 1991 Stipulation of Facts will not be repeated here. The parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan to use the term \"norm-referenced tests\" rather than \"standardized tests\" to clarify the difference among norm-referenced. criterion-referenced and minimum performance tests. since all of these tests are standardized. (p.l) .- 3 . 13 . 4. The parties added to the settlement plans a requirement for a management information system to be developed by LRSD which will have the capability to compare in later years students who participated in the four-year-old program to those who did not (p.l4) for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the four- ^Page references are to the May 1991 Plan unless otherwise noted. LUSO/liMi^iMnd 2old-program. 5. The Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet Program was incorporated in the May 1991 Plan from the Tri-District Plan (pp.25-27) because the parties believe that:(1) the high quality early childhood program will attract white students to Rockefeller who will elect to continue their education at Rockefeller and thereby enhance the desegregation effort there\n(2) its location near an interstate highway makes Rockefeller an ideal magnet site because of its accessibility to students throughout the county\nand (3) the early childhood program can help children from the Rockefeller attendance zone by enhancing their educational program in a desegregated setting. 6. The parties added a requirement to use the information generated by LRSD's monitoring of the four-year-old program nc less frequently than annually to improve that program (p.34). 7. The parties agreed to minor changes in the Summer Learning Program (pp.39-41) to reflect that fact that the Sxxmmer Learning Program was at the time the settlement plans were written and is now fully funded by the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) . The. enrollment requirements are governed by federal regulations. I The JTPA program cannot admit or serve non-certified participants\". The settlement plans were therefore amended to eliminate the word \"non-certified\" (p.4O). All participants must meet JTPA eligibility requirements. 8. The Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) (p.41) is no longer used for the Summer Learning Program. The TABE provides 3information related to student growth in terms of grade equivalent and is designed to assess adult education. A more appropriate measure of student growth was needed. Therefore, with JTPA approval, the Metropolitan Achievement Tests - Sixth Edition (MAT- 6) was substituted for the TABE. The May 1991 Plan eunends the settlement plans accordingly. Use of the MAT-6 enables the LRSD to ( use the same procedure for identifying students who need remediation during the summer as is used during the regular school year. 9. The parties added a requirement that the LRSD Student Hearing Officer will be responsible for developing and monitoring plans to reduce the disparity of disciplinary actions (p.50-51). This requirement strengthens the settlement plans with respect to the issue of disparate discipline and places a responsibility for reducing the disparity of disciplinary actions with the person most involved with student discipline and in the best position to\"reduce the disparity. 10. The parties added a requirement {p.63) that LRSD remove any barriers to equitable participation of all students in all classes. 11. The parties strengthened the provisions of the settlement plans which protect against excessive pullouts and possible resegregation in academic support programs (p.75-76) by requiring written approval of the parent or guardian before students may be placed in academic support programs and specifically requiring that \"pullouts' will be a last resort and will be kept at \"a minimal 4level\". 12. The parties added a specific process by which improvement plans will be developed for students participating in academic support programs (p.78-79). 13 . The parties broadened the scope of students who will be eligible to participate in LRSD's Gifted Education Program (p.88) by requiring \"above average intellectual ability and creative ability\" rather than \"superior intellectual and creative ability\". 14 , The parties also revised the language describing the LRSD Gifted Program to reflect changes in the delivery of services to identified students which were approved by the LRSD Board of Directors and the Arkansas Department of Education in 1989. (p.87) ( These changes resulted from LRSD's desegregation efforts during the 1983-89 school year to develop an equitable selection process for the Gifted and Talented Program. 15. The parties added a specific requirement (p.ll3) for the purchase of science and math materials to facilitate a \"hands-on approach to those subjects and a requirement to provide in-service training to staff regarding the use of those materials. 16. The settlement plans were changed to incorporate from the Tri-District Plan the requirement that LRSD establish an Academic Progress Incentive Grant Program (pp. 127-30). 17. The notation in the settlement plans that \"in 1989-90 an additional science teacher and a part-time Technical Writing teacher will be needed\" was deleted because of LRSD's present ability to provide the courses described in the May 1991 Plan 5( 9 9 (including Technical Writing/Applied Statistics) with existing staff. 18 . The parties changed the listed prerequisites for physics at Parkview Science/Mathematics Magnet School {p.l46) to conform to LRSD's current prerequisites. The prerequisites listed in the settlement plans served to unnecessarily exclude a number of ( tudents from participation in this magnet school program. 19 . The McClellan Community School Program (p.148-49) was taken from the Tri-District Plan and included in the May 1991 Plan because of the success of that program. 20. The parties added a number of specific requirements to strengthen the LRSD Library/Media Program (p.167-63), including requirements for a school-wide reading motivation activity each year, the correlation of library instruction to classroom instruction, the requirement that library media specialists provide training for building staff in the use of materials and equipment. and the requirement that library media specialists perform an annual evaluation of the adequacy of multicultural materials in the library collection. 21. Because funding is now provided in LRSD for indirect special education services. the erstwhile problem \"funding for indirect services\" was deleted from the list of \"areas of need\" (p.l72) in the LRSD special education section of the settlement plans. 22 . The parties agreed to strengthen the LRSD Staff Development Program (p.191-92) to include a list of specific staff 6 1auhy'iSU:p LXSO/befdtftria( ( development requirements, including the participation in staff development planning of community resource persons and all district personnel responsible for delivering training, and a requirement that LRSD deal decisively with the issue of racism and involve all staff, students and parents in a comprehensive prejudice reduction program. The settlement plans required the LRSD Data Processing Division to support school based and central office based functions by providing dropout statistics, test scores. attendance data. disciplinary data and student assignment data (p.204-05). In the May 1991 Plan the parties provided the additional requirement that the data processing office provide \"Student Achievement Data (to include the capacity to monitor test scores, grade distribution and other identified achievement data by race, gender, grade, subject, school and district wide)\" (p.2O5). The settlement plans established secondary attendance zones for each incentive school (p.220-21). Students in the secondary attendance zone of an incentive school had the option to fill vacancies in that incentive school after grandfathered and primary attendance zone students were assigned (p. 221). This provision was eliminated by the parties in the May 19 91 Plan because it would reduce the pool of white students eligible to transfer to each incentive school. The elimination of the 23 . 24 . secondary attendance zone allows any white student in Little Rock School District to enroll in any incentive school. The secondary attendance zones would also have allowed West Little Rock black 7( ' 9 students to transfer to incentive schools to the detriment of primary attendance zone black students who might attempt to enroll at a later date and find no space available. 25 . The parties agreed in the settlement plans to reserve in .each incentive school a certain number of seats in each prekindergarten and kindergarten class for black and white students (c. 221) . In order to avoid having pre-kindergarten and kindergarten seats go unused while eligible neighborhood black students are bused to more distant schools, the parties have included in the May 1991 Plan language which will allow such students to fill the seats reserved for white students which, even after recruitment, would otherwise remain vacant. r 26. In order to maximize desegregation at all grade levels. the parties added to the settlement plans specific authorization for desegregation transfers by LRSD students to elementary area schools that are difficult to desegregate (p. 222). 27. In order to help harmonize procedxires among the three Pulaski County school districts and to benefit LRSD employees and their children, the parties agreed to add to the settlement plans a provision to allow enrollment of the children of LRSD employees at the schools where the employees work (p. 223-24). This provision does not apply to magnet schools and is subject to desegregation requirements and the capacity limits of the particular school. 28. The LRSD Student Assignment Handbook which would have I been used for the 1989-90 school year was included in the 8( ' settlsment plans (p. 226, 233-48). That handbook includes a timeline and procedures which are now obsolete. For that reason, and because the student assignment handbook is a procedural document which is subject to change each year, the parties did not include that document in the May 1991 Plan. 29. The parties described Dunbar Junior High School in the settlement plans as a computer science/music school and set forth the specific programs and course offerings which would be available at Dunbar (p. 226-23, 230-36). By force of a 1989 district court ( order, which the parties did not seek to stay pending appeal. Dunbar has operated for the past two years as an international studies/gifted and talented magnet. The parties have expressed in the May 1991 Plan (p. 228-29) their agreement that Dunbar should continue to operate as an international studies/gifted and talented magnet because the benefits of implementing the program described in the settlement plans are outweighed by the detriments of the disruption which would be required to return to that program. 30. An international studies magnet program was established at Central High School by the terms of the Tri-District Plan. The parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan (p. 228) to continue this program. 31. Washington Elementary School was a racially identifiable black school during the 1989-90 school year and is described in the settlement plans as an interdistrict school. Under the terms of the Tri-District Plan, Washington was opened for the 1990-91 school year as a racially balanced (57% black) magnet school. The parties 9( 9 have agreed that the magnet program at Washington has been successful and therefore included Washington as a magnet school in the May 1991 Plan (p. 229). 32. LRSD agreed in the settlement plans to build two new interdistrict elementary schools (p. 258) . The first school was to have the capacity of 600 students. No capacity requirement for the second school was included in the plans. The parties have agreed in the May 1991 Plan to increase the capacity of the first LRSD interdistrict school, which the parties now agree will be nampH Martin Luther King Interdistrict School, to 696 students (p. 258). The language of the settlement plans expressing the possibility that Rockefeller may become an interdistrict school (p. ( 260) was deleted in accordance with the agreement described above that Rockefeller will remain an early childhood magnet and an incentive school. 34. The language of the settlement plans regarding computer laboratories in incentive schools, which required a minimum of 24 stations in each classroom (p. 267), was changed to reflect the fact that the minimum required number of stations is 25 and to clarify the intention of the parties that there will be one computer laboratory at each incentive school, not in each classroom. 35. The settlement plans restricted participation in the incentive school mentoring program to intermediate age students in grades four through six. The parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan to expand the mentoring program to include all students (p. 271). 10I 36. 9 The parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan to improve the incentive school component of the settlement plans by requiring an annual review of the incentive school curriculum and an annual inservice for incentive school staff members regarding any revisions in the incentive school curriculum (p. 288). 37. Thc parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan to strengthen the provision for Homework Centers in the incentive schools by saying that Homework Centers \"will\", rather than \"should\", be in place at each incentive school and by expanding the Homework Center program from a minimum of two days per week to a minimum of three days per week (p. 296). 38. The parties deleted the superfluous modifier \"certified . before \"instructional aides\" (P- 296) because there 13 no certification program for instructional aides and the parties do not intend to limit employment as an instructional aide to those who are certified as teachers. 39. The settlement plans did not contain a program to provide financial assistance to instructional aides so that they may pursue education degrees and provide a pool of potential teachers for LRSD. Such a program was added in the May 1991 Plan (p. 297-98) . 40. The requirement that \"Explorer Post Access/Membership\" be available to incentive school students (p. 300) was deleted in the May 1991 Plan because elementary students do not meet the age requirements for Explorer Post membership. 41. Washington school, as noted above, was an incentive I school in the settlement plans, was changed to a magnet school in 11( the Tri-District Plan, and was proposed for continuation as magnet school in the May 1991 Flan. To ensure that students in the a Washington attendance zone will retain some of the benefits to which they would have been entitled had Washington become an interdistrict school, the parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan that ( such students \"will have access to extended day activities, extended year activities and the scholarship program.\" (p. 303). 42. The settlement plans required that student evaluators in the incentive school assess the educational climate at each school twice a year (p. 306). The parties have determined in the May 1991 Plan that such evaluations need be performed only once each year. but that the group of evaluators should be expanded to include teachers and parents as well as students. 43. The parties have agreed in the May 1991 Plan to expand the Saturday program.^ at incentive schools to include physical education activities (p. 308) . 44. The parties have agreed to add representatives of the Joshua Intervenors to the incentive school staffing committee (p. 322) . 45. The requirement that an instructional specialist be hired to provide assistance to new teachers and others with special instructional needs (p. 328) was changed to reflect the fact that the LRSD Instructional Resource Center staff is of sufficient size to provide such assistance and that such assistance will also be provided by curriculum supervisors and the incentive schools coordinator. LIlSQ/liMMdMrkl 1246. In order to clarify and strengthen the provisions of the incentive schools staffing section of the settlement plans, the parties have included language in he May 1991 Plan which establishes committee composed of teachers, principals, administrators and parents to review the incentive school program and recommend change: for the 1991-92 school year, to pay teachers a stipend for their work on the committee, to share the coTn-mi-h-t-PP'g report with the parties. to require incentive school teachers to report to work five days early (except for Franklin school teachers) for in-service, to pay stipends to those teachers for this work, and to require Franklin school teachers to'report to work ten days early for in-service and to pay stipends to Franklin -teacher for this work (p. 329} . The 1991-92 school year is the (' firs year in which Franklin will operate as an incentive school. 47. The parties have-agreed to add to the setrlement plans a requirement that LRSD collect and review data on the needs and interests of its student population, particularly targeting at-risk students, including such information as \"number per grade level. race/gender makeup, academic achievement needs/interests. disciplinary needs, health needs. social interaction- needs. and attendance and tardiness records (p. 335). 48. The parties have agreed to broaden the scope of any parenting education classes by eliminating the language that such classes are only \"for mothers\" (p. 344) . 49. The parties have agreed to expand the scope of math and science workshops to include parents as well as students (p. 353). 13I 9 9 50. The  parties have agreed that coiamittee of administrators, parents and teachers should work o develop a a school improvement plan at each incentive school rather than simply establish school policies and procedures (p. 356). 51. The parties have agreed to expand the scope of parent recruitment for the incentive school program by requiring information sessions at churches throughout the entire community, rather than just the black community (p. 35S) . 52. The May 1991 Plan does not contain the requirement of the settlement plans that LRSD hire two parent recruiters (p. 360) because those two parent recruiters were hired in 1989, 53 . The parties have agreed to strengthen the monitoring provision of the settlement plans by including in the May 1991 Plan .resent for educational equity monitoring in all schools in LRSD by the Planning, Research and Evaluation staff with assistance from local bi-racial committees and including a requirement for quarterly evaluations of the incentive schools by the districtwide bi-racial committee and a requirement for semi-annual reports to the superintendent concerning such issues as separation of races in chool programs, achievement disparity, curriculum. staff development, extracurricular activities and student discipline (p. 371-72) . 54. The May 1991 Plan reflects the parties' agreement to strengthen the settlement plans with respect to the consultant/monitor by requiring quarterly visits to schools in PCSSD and NLRSD as well as LRSD (p. 374) . LUSO/lBMidMU-A 14r  55. The May 1991 Flan does not contain the description of the LRSD's computerized transportation system found in the settlement plans because the settlement plans described only what had been done in 1983-89 and what would be done in 1989-90. Everything described in the settlement plans has been completed (p. 376-77). 56. The settlement plans contained an LRSD data processing schedule for the 1989-90 school year (p. 379-80). This data processing schedule was not included in the May 1991 Plan because it is obsolete, it adds nothing of substance to the desegregation plan, and the data processing schedule will change from year to year. 57. The interdistrict school component of the settlement ( plans restricted participation in interdistrict schools to LRSD black students and PCSSD white students. The parties have agreed in the May 1991 Plan to expand the interdistrict school program to authorize NLRSD black students to transfer to Crystal Hill Interdistrict school if space is available after the transfer of LRSD black students to that school (p. 255). 58. The parties agreed in the May 1991 Plan to strengthen the summer school component of the interdistrict plan by requiring the cooperative summer school planning among the three districts \"will\" be conducted \"each year\" rather than \"should\" be \"scheduled for early 1989\" (p. 416). The parties also agreed to expand plans for tuition-free summer programs to those students \"in danger of\" grade retention rather than just those students already \"recommended\" for grade retention (p. 417). 15I 59. e e In the May 1991 Plan, the parties agreed to add to the settlement plans as an objective the establishment of a uniform records transfer policy and the requirement to appoint a committee to develop procedure and time lines for records transfer (p. 437) . The parties also agreed to add as an objective uniformity among the districts in reporting test results and analyzing disparities (p. 440) . 60. The settlement plans said that the directors or coordinators of counseling services for the three districts should meet monthly to share concerns and to plan for joint activities (p. 469) . xn he May 1991 Plan, that language is strengthened to require that those people \"will\" meet monthly. 61. In the May 1991 Plan, the parties agreed to add to the settlement plans an entire section on public relations (p. 476-39) which is taken from the Tri-District Plan. 62. The settlement plans contained a requirement that Russian be taught at Parkview Science Magnet School (p. 138). Following the rejection of the settlement plans by the district court. Russian courses were established at both the Central High School nternational Studies Magnet and the Dunbar Junior High School International Studies/Gifted and Talented Magnet. The parties have therefore expressed their agreement in the May 1991 Plan that there is no benefit to be gained by establishing a competing program at Parkview. 63 . The settlement plans were drafted during the Fall of 1988 and plans for each of the three school districts were submitted to 16( 9 9 the district court in January, 1989, Minor revisions to the LRSD Plan dealing primarily with the issue of grandfathering of student assignments required a resuhmission of Volume II of the LRSD Plan to the district court on March 23, 1989. The Interdistrict Plan was submitted to the district court in February of 1989. Two and cne-half years have passed since the settlement plans were drafted. Many of the dates by which the parties were supposed to implement various aspects of the plan have already passed\nother deadlines are new impossible to meet. The parties have therefore agreed in the May 1991 Plan to change many of the dates in the settlement plans so that implementation can proceed on a reasonable schedule as it would have done had the plans been approved in 1989. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Breadway Little Rock, AR 72201 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 . BY\n^ohn Walker Christopher Hei*\nr WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Little Rock, AR 72201 Said Jone^ BY:_________ Ste'^ Jones C\\ 6/ MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL, P.A. 1014 West Third Little Rock, AR 72201 BY\n_________________ Richard Roachell (. 17 ( f 9 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Stipulation has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 19th day of July 1991: Ms. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 ( Christopher Hei bthyVSUp UtSO/lstM^iMna 18 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 EAST MARKHAM, SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 October 28, 1991 Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ruth: As you are aware, the District Court is obligated to monitor the use of settlement monies and does so through the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. ODM must be able to provide the Court with information which (1) accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the districts legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obhgations. For the past several weeks, my associate. Bob Morgan, has been working closely with your Manager of Support Services, Jim Ivey, and also with our financial consultants, the Arkansas Financial Group, to develop a system for adequately and fairly monitoring desegregation finances. During the course of this process it has become apparent that the settlement monies are being spent at a rate which wiU exhaust them long before the plan commitments and their scheduled fulfillment have been reahzed. Budgeting and fiscal management to ensure full implementation of the desegregation plan needs to be such that the district can answer the following questions: 1. 2. 3. What are the district guidelines for identifying expenditures as desegregation costs? What process is used to project the desegregation budget? How do these costs conespond to the specific provisions of the desegregation plan, i.e., what is the correlation between the settlement monies and specific desegregation objectives?Page Two October 28, 1991 4. If a cost item is determined to be both a desegregation and nondesegregation item (staff development might be a fair example), what criteria determines the apportionment of cost to the desegregation budget (Code 13) and the \"regular\" budget? 5. Who makes the decisions about which cost items are budgeted in Code 13? 6. Who makes the decisions about which costs are actually debited to Code 13? 7. What criteria determine how budgeting and debiting decisions are made? 8. What checks are buUt into the accounting/bookkeeping system to prevent arbitrary debiting of cost items to one budget category or another? 9. What are the districts spending priorities and how have they been determined? 10. What is the districts plan and corresponding timeline for reaching the 90% achievement goal for black students, thereby attaining forgiveness of state loans the district otherwise must repay? 11. What steps is the district taking to prevent a funding shortfall that will inhibit carrying out the desegregation plan to its fuU extent? Within the next ten days. Bob and I want to meet with you to discuss the answers to these . questions. We are aware of the enormity of the districts planning, budgeting, and accounting tasks\nif we can be of any assistance as the above information is gathered, please dont hesitate to let me know. Very truly yours, Ann S. Brown Federal Monitor cc: Judge Susan Weber WrightOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 EAST MARKHAM, SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 October 28, 1991 Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ruth: As you are aware, the District Court is obhgated to monitor the use of settlement monies and does so through the Office of Desegregation Monitorin\ng- ODM must be able to provide the Court with information which (1) accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the districts legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation obligations. For the past several weeks, my associate. Bob Morgan, has been working closely with your Manager of Support Services, Jim Ivey, and also with our financial consultants, the Arkansas Financial Group, to develop a system for adequately and fairly monitoring desegregation finances. During the course of this process it has become apparent that the settlement monies are being spent at a rate which will exhaust them long before the plan commitments and their scheduled fulfillment have been realized. Budgeting and fiscal management to ensure full implementation of the desegregation plan needs to be such that the district can answer the following questions: 1. What are the district guidelines for identifying expenditures as desegregation costs? 2. What process is used to project the desegregation budget? 3. How do these costs correspond to the specific provisions of the desegregation plan, i.e., what is the correlation between the settlement monies and specific desegregation objectives?Page Two October 28, 1991 4. If a cost item is determined to be both a desegregation and nondesegregation item (staff development might be a fair example), what criteria determines the apportionment of cost to the desegregation budget (Code 13) and the \"regular\" budget? 5. Who makes the decisions about which cost items are budgeted in Code 13? 6. Who makes the decisions about which costs are actually debited to Code 13? 7. What criteria determine how budgeting and debiting decisions are made? 8. What checks are built into the accounting/bookkeeping system to prevent arbitrary debiting of cost items to one budget category or another? 9. What are the districts spending priorities and how have they been determined? 10. What is the districts plan and corresponding timeline for reaching the 90% achievement goal for black students, thereby attaining forgiveness of state loans the district otherwise must repay? 11. What steps is the district taking to prevent a funding shortfall that will inhibit carrying out the desegregation plan to its fuU extent? Within the next ten days, Bob and I want to meet with you to discuss the answers to these questions. We are aware of the enormity of the districts planning, budgeting, and accounting tasks\nif we can be of any assistance as the above information is gathered, please dont hesitate to let me know. Very truly yours. Ann S. Brown Federal Monitor cc: Judge Susan Weber Wright\"n 4 3 Little Rock School District December 12, 1991 T J? DEC 1 3 1991 Mr. Bob Morgan Office of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Building, Suite 510 Ciiics o! Os\nic*i Hioring 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 4 W Dear Bob: Attached are our responses to the questions posed in Ann Brown's letter to Dr. Steele on October 28. I believe you will find them to be essentially the same as our previous verbal responses. , Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, T: Tony Wood Deputy Superintendent TW/ch 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361LRSD ANSWERS TO ODM QUESTIONS (Reference 10/28/91 Ann Brown letter to Dr. Steele) Question 1. What are the district guidelines for identifying expenditures as desegregation costs? Answer: Desegregation is one of the basic objectives of the District. Almost everything we do is directed to some degree to this goal. It is not possible therefore, and we have not attempted to identify all the cost associated with it. Our approach has been to identify personnel and materials that are required for the specific programs mandated by the Desegregation Plan, to set up budget accounts for those expenses, and charge to them as the programs are implemented. This approach may result in our charging less than possible to desegregation, but it should allow us to account for the settlement funds. It has never been the view of the LRSD that the settlement funds would cover the total cost of desegregation. Using the funds for court-mandated programs will allow us to use the money and to be able to show that it was used for proper purposes. For the purposes of showing that settlement funds are properly spent, budget/expense accounts are established for the specific programs in the Desegregation Plan. Expenses associated with those programs are charged to those accounts. Question 2. What process is used to project the desegregation budget? Answer: Building principals, department directors, and others responsible for various functions in the LRSD are designated as budget managers. Each spring the budget managers submit requests for each of the budget account codes assigned to them. If an individual has responsibility for a program mandated by the Desegregation Plan, he or she will have account codes for that. These budgets are approved by the Deputy Superintendent, Associate Superintendents, Assistant Superintendents (where appropriate). Manager of Support Services, and the Controller. All of these codes will show a fund code of 13. If a Desegregation Plan program requires office supplies, for example, there will be an amount coded in the budget for expenses of that description that are related to the desegregation program.QDM Response Page 2 Question 3. How do these costs correspond to the specific provisions of the desegregation plan, i.e., what is the correlation between the settlement monies and specific desegregation objectives? Answer: The costs can be tied to programs that are specified in the Desegregation Plan. This will not be obvious from accounting reports but can be done through discussion with budget managers and the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. Question 4. If a cost item is determined to be both a desegregation and nondesegregation item (staff development might be a fair example), what criteria determines the apportionment of cost to the desegregation budget (Code 13) and the \"regular\" budget? Answer: If, at budget time, it is determined that an individual will divide time between Desegregation Plan mandated programs and other activities, appropriate portions of that persons cost will be budgeted to the fund source codes. That persons cost will be automatically charged as budgeted through the year. For non-personnel costs, most of the expenses that can be charged to desegregation programs are easily identified, such as PAL computers and four-year- old program equipment. We have the capability to apportion costs, if needed. Question 5. Who makes the decisions about which cost items are budgeted in Code 13? Answer: The budget managers make this decision with review by the Deputy Superintendent, Associate Superintendents, the Manager of Support Services, and the Controller.QDM Response Page 3 Question 6. Who makes the decisions about which costs are actually debited to Code 13? Answer: The budget managers either make this decision or review monthly expense listings to make sure it is properly done. The Associate Superintendent for Desegregation also reviews all Fund 13 expenses monthly. Since many Desegregation Plan projects are the responsibility of the Associate Superintendent for Educational Programs, she also closely reviews these expenses on a monthly basis. Further, our computer system will not allow a budget account to be overdrawn. To transfer additional money into an account from another account requires approval of the Manager of Support Services. These processes are the same as those used to control all LRSD expenses including those that must meet certain state regulations. practices are sound. Independent audits show that LRSD accounting Question 7. What criteria determine how budgeting and debiting decisions are made? Answer: The accounts are clearly named so there is little confusion. The budget managers code the expenses. Question 8. What checks are built into the accounting/bookkeeping system to prevent arbitrary debiting of cost items to one budget category or another? Answer: The procedures described above with the monthly reviews described are intended to catch any improper coding. If an expense is improperly coded to a valid account that has sufficient funds, manual reviews like those described above are the only possible ways to detect it. As stated above, these are the same procedures used throughout our system, and independent audits have consistently found our procedures to be sound.ODM Response Page 4 Question 9. What are the district's spending priorities and how have they been determined? Answer: The district must implement the programs mandated by the Desegregation Plan, must meet state education standards, must meet debt service commitments, and must make the capital improvements committed to voters in millage elections. All salary expenses are under contracts. There is little to prioritize. As Desegregation Plan programs are implemented and their effectiveness is determined, we can petition the court and the other parties to allow us to discontinue or modify those that are not effective. Until we reach that point, we can do little to prioritize our costs. Question 10. What is the districts plan and corresponding timeline for reaching the 90% achievement goal for black students, thereby attaining forgiveness of state loans the district otherwise must repay? Answer: The LRSD will implement the plan called \"No More Excuses: A Plan to Increase Learning for All Students in the Little Rock School District.\" This plan, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on March 28, 1991, provides the framework for attaining the 90% achievement goal for black students (see attachment). Question 11. What steps is the district taking to prevent a funding shortfall that will inhibit carrying out the desegregation plan to its full extent? Answer: As stated in response #9 above, LRSD will measure effectiveness and attempt to remove ineffective programs in the plan. We will address overall funding problems through reducing programs that we can reduce, better management practices and, if necessary, a request for increased millages. F:odminto2.wpdNO MORE EXCUSES: A PLAN TO INCREASE LEARNING FOR ALL STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT The purpose of this report is twofold: first, to identify and discuss problems and issues which the Little Rock School District must address if we are to substantially improve the level of learning in our schools\nand second, to outline a plan to empower all our students to be successful learners. BACKGROUND import te ichc cur co: What students are learning in our schools is the most it issue School Board members, administrators, and must ccnsi C  omunity. as decisions are made about education in The elimination of academic achievement disparities between black and white students, the enrollment in upper level courses, appropriate remediation for the students who are not learning, the use of school assignments, ibraries, homework minimum grade point requirements for graduation, the number and quality of reading assignments, multi-cultural education. \"tracking,\" higher order thinking skills, and many other issues are all related to this central question: How can we get students to learn what we think they should know and how can we be sure they are learning as much and as well as they can? Last fall the administration was asked to consider a proposal to require a 2.0 grade point average as a requirement for graduation and to subm consideration by Decemiber. : a re: The a rt to t. inistra' ncc subm ua\ntec rcr ts report December 3 and recommended that the 2.0 req-uirement be phased in starting with certain minimum requirements for the 1991-92 school year and implemented fully by 1994-95. The recommendation was presented to the Board at the December meeting and tabled for further consideration at a later meeting. Tn January, 1991, the Little Rock School District received riculum Audit conducted in September 1990 by a team of administrators and professors from the National Academy of School Executives. This audit was authorized by the Board when it adopted the budget in August 1990. The audit found that the District's curriculum is disjointed, uncoordinated, and inappropriately sequenced. It found that district-wide curricui im objectives do not exist, grading practices are 1 ent, promotion criteria are unclear. assessment is not ted to the curriculum, and curriculum guides lack internal ency. In short, even though the Little Rock School  isurict is performing \"reasonably well\" according to the Curriculum Audit, much work needs to be done to improve curriculum design, content, delivery, sequence, and assessment of student learning.Following the December Board meeting, three public hearings were held to give District patrons an opportunity to express their views regarding the proposed 2.0 requirement. were evident during these hearings. Two opinions The first was that people were generally in favor of the schools setting higher learning expectations for students. The second opinion was that schools are responsible for seeing to it that students receive every possible opportunity to develop their intellectual abilities to the fullest extent and that this responsibility is not being met in all cases. Concern was also expressed for the student with identified learning deficits who might not ever be able to achieve the requirement of a 2.0 g.p.a. Since the public hearings, a survey was sent to teachers and principals requesting their opinions concerning the 2.0 g.p.a. requirement. The results showed support for the 2.0 but mos thought it should be phased in. The District's Biracial Advisory Committee took the position that the effectiveness of the current remedial and compensatory programs should be assessed before the Board decides to implement the 2.0 g.p.a. requirement. PROBLEMS AND ISSUES The problem of low student achievement in the Little Rock School District is not unique in our community. In a report entitled Accelerating Academic Achievement: A Summary of Findings from 20 Years of NAEP [National Assessment of Educational Progress, September 1990] the following points are made: 1. \"Most of the data in this report show th our present education performance is low and not improving. II 2. \"Research shows that student academic perforaance is likely to be greater when pupils work hard, when parents are actively involved in their children's education, and when teachers and school administrators incorporate research tested improvements in the classroom. Yet, this report ....shows that these things are not typically happening.\" 3. \"Time devoted to some subject areas is limited... It 4 . Homework is often minimal or non-exisment. II 25. \"Most classroom work is dominated by passive learning activities that feature teacher and textbook-presented information despite research findings indicating that these techniques are not the most effective. It 6. II Although parents are our children's first and most effective teachers, large proportions of students are not reading outside of school, are spending excessive hours watching television, and are spending little time on homework. If 7. II Students can read at a surface level, getting the gist of material, but they do not read analytically or perform well on challenging reading assignments. II 3 . \"Small proportions of students write well enough to accomplish the purposes of different writing tasks\nmost do not communicate effectively. II 9. \"Students' grasp of the four basic a thmetic operations and beginning problem solving is far from universal in elementary and junior high school... II 10. \"Only small proportions of students appear to develop specialized knowledge needed to address science-based problems and the pattern of falling behind begins in elementary school. It 11. \"Students are familiar with events that have shaped American history, but they do not appear to understand the significance and connection of these events.\" 12. II In recent assessments, more students appear to be gaining basic skills, yet fewer are demonstrating a erase of higher-level application of these skills II 13 . \"Despite progress in narrowing the gaps, the differences in performance between white students and their minority counterparts remain unacceptably large.\" 14. \"La enr sci e proportions of students....are not lied \"ce c challengine mathematics and urseworx. II 315. II Across the last 20 years, little seems to have changed in the way students are taught. Despite much research suggesting better alternatives, classrooms still appear to be dominated by textbooks, teacher lectures, and short answer activity sheets.\" Other findings from the NAEP report are also highly disturbing: 31 percent of the 12th graders in 1988 read five or fewer pages per day from all. textbooks in both homework and school. 52 percent of the 12th graders in 1988 said they never or rarelv borrow books from the school or public library. 97 percent of the 4th graders reported that they completed workbooks or skill sheet assignments on what they read\nonly 45 percent said they talked in pairs or groups abou' their reading. More than 30 percent of the eighth and twelfth graders reported never talking to someone at home about things they read. Nearly three-fourths of the eighth graders had teachers who reported spending an hour or less on writing instruction and assistance each week or les\n15 minutes per cav. At grade 12, half the students assessed in 1988 reported that they had written two or fewer papers as part of any school assignment in the six weeks before the assessment. Only 14 percent of the Sth graders and 9 percen' of the seniors reported weekly writing assignments of three or more pages. At grade 3, 49 percent of the teachers reported spending one to two hours a week teaching science. In 1986, one quarter of the assessed were no enrolled eleventh graders in a math course and ley. Mat: anorher one quarter were taking lower 1 math courses such as General emetics, ?re-algebra. or Algebra I. 4Slightly more than half said they were not taking any type of science course. More than two-thirds of the high school seniors typically do an hour or less of homework each day. Only 29 percent had two or more hours of homework each day. presented. These findings are by no means all that the NAEP Report Many others are equally distressing. The inescapable conclusion is that students, for the most part, do not learn nearly what they are able to learn. for several reasons: This appears to be the case (1) they are taught in ways that have been proven ineffective over and over by well-documented research\n(2) the curriculum is content-deficient, and (3) expectations from both parents and educators are set at an unacceptably low level. While these findings are based on nationwide research, they are no atypical of what we find locally and should give us cause for e concern. In fact, the grade distribution. level of expectations, a large amount of test scores. \"seatwork\" in our classrooms, and the limited use of libraries are among the indicators in our own District that support these findings. As we examine our schools in relation to the NAEP report and decide whether to impose a minimum requirement for graduation, we must reflect upon events that have greatly affected our ability to deliver quality education to our students. 1983, we have been in court almost continuously. Since January, During that period, no less than four desegregation plans have been written. Weeks were spent in 1938 and 1989 negotiating a settlement with the State to bring an end to the desegregation litigation. District has experienced significant changes in The boundaries. Board governance. and adm ti its geocraph As was DO ted out in the Curriculum Audit, the District has had five different superintendents since 1982. The issues we have dealt with and the rapidity of the changes which have occurred in the District have contributed in varying degrees to weakening many of our internal processes and organizational procedures. We have seen job roles become less clearly defined, lines of authority eroded, and employees not held accountable for their work. The result  as was vividly and painfully described in the Curriculum Audit  is a district in which \"Learning is not likely to get any better, and it could continue to get worse unless administrative direction. expertise. provided in the educational programs of the Li and interventi n are srrict.\" le Rock School In fulfill (p.l4)\ny opinion. two things are necessary before we can he responsibilities we have as a school district toward 5our patrons and students. reviewed, revised. First, Board policies must be and in some cases improved. Coherent, consistent regulations, directives, and procedures must be developed where needed to support the enactment of these policies. Then all employees must be held accountable for carrying out Board policies and adhering to regulations, directives, and procedures developed to support them. Second, as the Audit pointed out, the curriculum must be reviewed, revised as necessary, developed in an appropriate scope and sequence, and capable of supporting carefully written educational objectives. In my opinion, we cannot afford to take three to five years to complete this redesign of our curriculum. It must be started now. Core areas of the curriculum (reading. language arts, math, science, social studies and fine arts) must be appropriately scoped and sequenced in time for use during the 1992-93 school year. This will require enormous work by a cadre or teac. ers and administrators, and it may very well require the expertise of curriculum designers who can work with our staff in putting our entire curriculum together in the proper scope. sequence, and format, K-12. reorganization of the central office admi It most certainly will require istration and an allocation of sufficient resources in order to accomplish this major goal. Not until these things are done can we move forward as a district to address in a meaningful way the evaluation of effective teaching and building management, assessment of student learning, overall school success, and the effectiveness of central office leadership. In_my opinion, it would be unfair to place the full burden of improvement in student learning on the students and the parents. It is our responsibility to take appropriate and immediate action to remove all barriers to improved performance and at the same time raise expectations for student achievement. RECOMMENDED PLAN OF ACTION TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS OF INCREASED LEARNING FOR ALL STUDENTS I am recommending the following: 1. A review and adoption of revised Board policies in Curriculum and Instruction by the Little Rock School Board at a work session to be held before the end of the current school year, preferably during the month of April. All other Board policies will be reviewed. revised as necessary, and adopted by September, 1991. A decision by the Board at this work session as to the educational outcomes we want our students to have whe.n they leave our schools. 63 . A decision at the work session regarding the priority the Board wishes to assign to the thirteen recommendations of the Curriculum Audit. 4 . An acknowledgement by the Board that the proper way for the schools to address dispar ies in academic achievement is first to have a written curriculum that is comprehensive, relevant, challenging, and properly scoped and sequenced in grades K-12 and then to teach the curriculum effectively to all students, setting forth clear expectations and using strategies that have been proven successful for student learning. 5. Authorization by the Board to design and develop a curriculum specifically for Little Rock School District students which incorporates the characteristics in recommendation number four. 6. Authorization by the Board to develop a comprehensive grade level assessment program to determine the extent to which our students are mastering the curriculum. 7. A revision of the District's grading policies to make them more consistent from school to school and from classroom to classroom. It should be clear that grades are to be assigned on the basis of mastery of specific curriculum content. 8. Periodic reports to the Board, preferably each semester, showing the distribution of student grades at the secondary level. These reports will indicate courses in which students have the greatest difficulty and will track the progress of individual students on a random basis from grade to grade. An ongoing review of the District's remedial a compensatory programs by the Biracial Advisory .d Committee with recommendations for changes presented to the Board yearly for the next three years. 10. The implementation of an Instructional Management System by the 1992-93 school year that will enable us to track the progress of individual students and provide corrective prescriptions to improve learning. 11. The immediate reorganization of the central office administration to provide concentrated effort in curriculum development and appropriate supervision of schools. To that end, the Associate Superintendent will devote her time primarily to curriculum design and development and staff development. The job roles of the curriculum supervisors will be redefined to include 7more programmatic responsibility for the delivery of the curriculum. A third administrator will be assigned to provide supervision to the schools as an assistant superintendent. The assistant superintendents will report to the Deputy Superintendent. 12. 13 . 14 . 16. The development and implementation of a leadership academy and training program for current and prospective principals, assistant principals, and central office administrators. The development and implementation of a teacher mentoring program as a key component of the District's staff development. The revision of the District's overall staff development program to provide greater concentration in the delivery of key components ro our personnel. Special emphasis will be given to effective teaching strategies and use of current technologies for teaching and learning. 15 . Development of school-based parent training programs in every school em.phasizing parent workshops and other sessions held at schools and other locations which emphasize the following: Discipline strategies and order in the home Time management for children and parents Planning and monitoring home study Building self-esteem for parents and children Communication within the home and with the school Substance abuse prevention Nutrition and health Development of an Early Childhood Education curriculum that includes components from successful programs in our District (e.g. HIPPY) and other districts. Assuming that the administration is directed to implement these recommendations and following documentation through systematic and comprehensive assessment that significant progress is being made, the Little Rock School Board should reconsider the timeframe for implementation of a 2.0 g.p.a. requirement for graduation after the end of the 1992-93 school year. The decision as to whether the requirement should be implemented and when, should be based upon the Board's analysis of how effectively the above recommendations are being followed. 8TIMELINES Proposed timelines for reconsideration of the 2.0 requirement is outlined for your consideration and approval: 1. Reports to the Board and community documenting progress made in achieving each of the sixteen recommendations in the \"Plan to Increase Learning for All Students.'    * * August 1991 January 1992 April 1992 July 1992 * November 1992 February 1993 May 1993 August 1993 and ongoing s to the Board an community regarding grade oisr bution and test scores for the Little Rock stude * * * * * July 1991 February 1992 July 1992 February 1993 July 1993 and ongoing Reports to the Board from the Biracial Advisory Committee concerning the District's remedial and compensatory programs. Should the Committee wish to make recommendations for changes, they will be included in these reports. August 1991 * June 1992 * * * 2 . 3 . * * * January 1993 June 1993 and ongoing twice yearly. 4. Reconsideration of the recommendation to implement a 2.0 g.p.a. requirement for graduation from the Little Rock School District. * August, 1993 MONITORING AND EVALUATION Through the use of the reports outlined above, the Little Rock School District Board of Directors will have access to the data it needs to decide whether to implement a 2.0 g.p.a. graduation requirement. It is recommended that this year's as a seventh graders be used as the base population from which to crack an increase in students' ability to achieve a 2.0. If by the end of the 1992-93 seventh graders have demonstrated a 10 percent increase each year in the number of students achieving a 9C average, then it may be reasonable to assume that the 2.0 g.p.a. could be fairly required of the 1995-96 graduating class. This would extend by only one year the original time frame as described in the December report. Reports tracking the District's progress in achieving the recommendations in the report and student progress in achieving a 2.0 will be supplied to the parties in the desegregation case and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring with the view that what is learned in this process will be helpful both to educators and the community at large. Ruth S. Steele, Superintendent March 28, 1991 10INTERDISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN This plan was formulated by committees composed of representatives for the parties. The committees were: Student Assignments Programs/Academics Community and Board Relations School Operations The Student Assignment committee had oversight responsibilities for all others. LRSD, PCSSD, NLRSD, and Joshua all worked on this plan. The plan states, \"Tlie NLRSD, however has agreed to participate in those programs and efforts where the NLRSD is specifically identified by name but only to the extent that the language is specifically related to the NLRSD. The mention of the NLRSD by name in one sentence or paragraph does not imply that the NLRSD is included in preceding or succeeding sentences or paragraphs. Terms such as multidistrict the districts, etc. do not include the NLRSD unless the NLRSD so chooses.\" This plans stated objectives are to develop and implement a comprehensive desegregation plan for school districts in Pulaski County, with all schools (students and faculty) racially balanced as outlined in \"previous applicable court orders\", except as otherwise noted in this plan. INTERDISTRICT SCHOOLS There will be Interdistrict Schools with ratios of 60-40% of either race with the \"ideal goal\" to be 50-50. The responsibility for managing each Interdistrict School lies primarily with the host district. Six Interdistrict Schools will be established in the near term: Baker Harris Romine Stephens Crystal Hill Area King 1989-90 1989-90 1989-90 1990-91 1990-91 1992-93 Facilities considered for construction or establishment in the ftiture may include schools in or near Chenal Valley and the Scipio A. Jones site. The Interdistrict Schools shall be populated primarily by black students from the LRSD and by white students from PCSSD OR beyond Pulaski County. PCSSD and LRSD will engage in early, rigorous and sustained recruitment efforts designed to maximize participation in all Interdistrict Schools.\"2 INCENTIVE SCHOOLS These schools are to be established for at least six years to accommodate that number of black students who, by attending these schools, make it possible to achieve a student population in the remaining Little Rock schools of 55% black and 45% white (with a variance of 5%). Recruitment may increase the percentage of white students to 60% (page 4). The Incentive Schools shall be: Franklin, Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rightsell, Stephens, and Washington*. Desegregation of the Incentive Schools is to take place in phases. One phase is recruitment of white students. The other portion is to reserve seats in each incoming kindergarten class for the enrollment of white students. \"Funding for the Incentive Schools shall be set at two times the level for the Elementary Academies to ensure that the children who are in racially-isolated settings are provided meaningful opportunities for desegregated experiences/activities. To meet that goal, the parties shall utilize the services of a consultant who has demonstrated experience in developing and successfully implementing such programs in a majority black educational setting.\" MAGNET SCHOOLS , The parties pledge to continue to operate the six present Magnet Schools with a balance of 50- 55% black. Magnets are open to students in all three districts. It further states that each districts black/white ratio goal shall conform to its plan. FURTHER SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION All construction shall be subject to the courts prior approval and shall support desegregation. TRANSPORTATION Children shall be provided transportation to schools (including its programs and activities). Transportation is provided to children who live two or more miles from school. Bus rides shall not exceed 45 minutes unless a student has voluntarily chosen an assignment with the longer bus ride. OTHER AREAS - Aim to have equal facilities. Funds for schools in lower SOCIOECONOMIC areas shall be \"at least\" equal to those in more affluent areas. - Students from outside Pulaski County may select a Pulaski County school if such selection benefits desegregation. - Racial ratios of each districts faculty shall be consistent with applicable law.. * Washington was a magnet in the Tri-District Plan. A new school was constructed and it still serves as Basic Skills/Math and Science Magnet.3 ACHIEVEMENT DISPARITIES Parties set as a high priority the elimination of achievement disparities between black and white students. The degree of disparity shall be judged by student performance on standardized tests. The ADE with the district shall evaluate all programs and personnel for effectiveness in this area. If racial disparities exist in programs and activities at any school, \"they shall be identified, analyzed for cause, and shared with the appropriate monitoring authorities\". Special attention shall be given to racial disparities in: special education, honors, GT, advanced placement, extracurricular activities, expulsions and suspensions, reward and punishment systems. A year-end determination of each districts effectiveness in implementing desegregation shall be conducted by the parties subject to the courts review. \"The parties monitors shall be provided reasonable access to records and facilities, provided the requests for access are not disruptive, unreasonable, or intrusive.\" This plan takes \"positive steps\" to ensure that community \"involvement is substantive and ongoing. The parties also establish a joint committee to review curriculum and programs.\" (page 10). INTERDISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN (page 11) Magnet schools and M to M transfers are seen as \"building blocks\" of student assignment and transfer plans. Great mention is made of themes for Interdistrict Schools, and it is stressed that their selection involves parents/patrons. Interdistrict Schools to be established are: Baker Baker is to have an extended day program. This program does exist. It has not become an Interdistrict School yet and in the current appeal, efforts are made to prevent it from ever becoming one. PCSSD attorneys state that it has become balanced by M to M transfers. They suggest that the 200 seats that were to be at Baker for black LRSD students move to Crystal Hill when it is built. Harris Despite the fact that this plan states that Harris has the immediate capacity for 2(M) LRSD black students, Harris has not become an Interdistrict School. Again, appeals are being made to remove it as an interdistrict school, and to assign the proposed 200 LRSD seats to an unspecified \"new school\".4 Romine Romine is an Interdistrict School, and James Jennings states in his report of 8/22/91 to the LRSD Board of Directors that recruitment of white students from western PCSSD is underway. He also states that Pulaski County is informing their students on magnet waiting lists about open seats at Romine. A recruitment committee \"will be formed\" of staff members and parents to recruit throughout the year. Evidently the school year will begin before the committee forms. Romine added a 4-year-old class in 1991-92. Such a program is required, under this plan, as is a theme which was to be selected as of February 24, 1989. Stephens A new Interdistrict Stephens was to be constructed by the 1990-19 school year or, \"as soon as reasonably practical\". It is to be located near the 1-630 corridor. Current plans announced in the Gazette call for an opening date in Fall 1992 with the school to be constructed at 14th and Marshall on the site of old West Side Junior High, after it is razed. Stephens Interdistrict School will have an early childhood program. Black students will be assigned from the old Stephens attendance area (near 18th and Pine/Cedar). Plans are to attract white students from PCSSD and the children of state government workers. Crystal Hill An Interdistrict School is to be located near 1-430 and Maumelle Blvd. Some PCSSD whites may receive mandatory assignments to this school from the Oak Grove and Pine Forest attendance areas. Black students are to be recruited from the Romine area and/or attendance zones. King This is a new school to be constructed as a \"downtown Interdistrict School by the 1992-93 school year or as soon as reasonably practical\". A Montessori (modified?) theme is to be explored by a committee with representatives from each party. A report/recommendation regarding this will go to the Court by February 1990. OTHER STUFF - Interdistrict magnets are open to children from outside Pulaski County. - Consider a cooperatively-operated alternative school in North Little Rock. - By the end of 1990-91, it will be determined if an interdisciplinary school can be constructed in the Chenal Valley area and remain in compliance with desegregation requirements. - M to M transfers occur only when they enhance desegregation programs.5 PETITION TO MODIFY NLR DESEGREGATION PLAN Racial Composition of NLR Secondary Schools On 9/1/88 the Court approved a request to reorganize secondary schools. Ole Main will house grades 11 and 12. Northeast will have grades 9 and 10. Lakewood, Ridge Road, and Rose City will house grades 7 and 8. The North Little Rock magnet review committee has targeted white students at Lakewood for recruitment to Mann Magnet and LRSD black students to Lakewood as M to M transfers. The parties agree to make no mandatory reassignment of students to alter racial composition of secondary schools before 1990-91 provided no school is more than 5 points outside permissible levels (on page 20, the plan states that racial composition of each school is within 25% of the school district as a whole). To aid desegregation, black students from Ridge Road, Rose City, and Central Junior High (which no longer operates as a junior high) will be recruited for Oak Grove in PCSSD. Other transfers between NLR and Oak Grove may be allowed (page 23). SOMPA SOMPA (System of MultiPluralistic Assessment) has been dropped as an instrument for student evaluation for GT. The Torrence test for creative positives has been adopted instead. The NLRSD has implemented DISTAR peer tutoring and computer-assisted instruction as recommended in the Cantalician(?) Study. Other elements recommended in the study - Adaptive Learning Environment Model (ALEM) and Exemplary Center for Reading Instruction (ECRI)  have been adapted and combined with other programs (see page 24). Early Prevention of School Failure (EPSF) has been substituted for the Dallas Preschool Screening Test. All kindergarten children participate in the EPSF screening upon kindergarten entry. SUMMER SCHOOL Summer school programs are for both remediation and enrichment. LRSD will have a free summer program for \"a select\" number of students with achievement deficiencies in reading and math. The total number served is estimated to be 500 students grade 1-12. Summer Learning Program (Sth grade remediation) This is for students who fail the MPT. It operates six weeks during the summer in the areas of: reading, English/language arts, math, science and social studies. Students work only in areas of \"identified need\". The may work in one area for six weeks, or in two areas with three weeks spent on each area.6 JTPA Literacy Students (ages 14-21) in Summer Youth Employment Program must be assessed in reading and math, and provided remediation. Extended Year Services There are also provisions for year-round services for some handicapped children if it seems that too much skills regression can occur in the summer. Collaboration All three districts are supposed to collaborate on summer school offerings to provide information and options for students (page 32). A tuition-free summer program for primary children \"is being formulated\" as an early intervention strategy. Expected outcomes By the summer of 1993, it is anticipated that a comprehensive, equitable, county-wide summer program will be offered for students in Pulaski County. Evaluation and Monitoring Summer school enrollment will be evaluated/monitored according to grade level, gender, subject area, and race. Progress/failure will be monitored according to grade level, gender, subject area, and race. Clinical supervision will be provided for teachers. 1 Summer school staff members will complete a questionnaire at the end of each summer.78 SPECIAL EDUCATION (p. 58) The plan states that action should be taken to reduce the number of minority children in special education classes. The percentage of children assigned to such classes should be reflective of the percentage in the school population, and should be comparable to appropriate statistics of handicapped students. There are currently some collaborative efforts between the parties. Based on these successes, it is recommended in this plan that the parties work together on: I. Programs for the low-incidence handicapping conditions a. Visually impaired b. Hearing impaired c. Multi-handicapped d. Seriously emotionally disturbed 2. Staff development A. Central office staff b. Prlncipals/other school staff c. Teachers 3. Multi-district assessment committee a. establish consistent screening process b. establish evaluation instruments to be used c. establish consistent eligibility criteria for MR and SLD 4. Establish process and coordination in area of recruitment of minority teachers and support staff. 5. Establish multi-district system (forms and formats) for documenting due process procedures. Guidance and Counseling Program Cooperative Efforts (p. 83) In order to better serve minority students, the directors or coordinators of counseling for all three school districts should meet monthly to plan for areas of cooperation. To facilitate identification of all children requiring remediation, a joint testing program based on the MAT-6 will be considered. Joint test purchasing, scoring, and reporting are possibilities. A biracial multidistrict monitoring team of parents, teachers, administrators, etc., will monitor test preparation and testing conditions. Teachers will receive training in test interpretation to identify at-risk and gifted children. A system of timely transfers of records between the three districts will be developed. PARENT/COMMUNITY (See attached)well as developing new additional programs designed to facilitate substantive Involvement and cooperation of parents/citizens in the districts. The proposed plan, which will be implemented in the fall of 1989 and be an ongoing process, will include: A. Develop parent involvement/support activities which facilitate the teaching-learning process: 1. Establish Parents in Learning Program, a a community-supported effort to involve parents in the learning process which would utilize such programs as APPLE, \"Just Say No,\" and HIPPY\n2. Provide workshops for parents on such topics as discipline, learning aids, study skills. academic tutoring, etc.\n3. Parents and staff work cooperatively to develop 4. strategies to encourage positive home learning\nEach school will establish a teacher/parent committee to design and implement school-based ties\nactivi- 5. Promote multi-ethnic in-school parent/teacher mittees\ncom- 6. Develop and expand the parent volunteer programs: a. Encourage all parents to become an active member of a parent involvement program\nb. Recruit prospective committee members from diversified communities including retired teachers and community leaders\n86 01803B. utilize parents in marketing educational programs and benefits that will result from desegregation: 1. Develop a resource list of parents who are willing to be contacted to talk with potential patrons\n2. Establish parent recruitment teams in each school to encourage families to enroll in the public schools\n3 . Seek positive media coverage featuring parents from all multiethnic backgrounds: a. Work through local parent/teacher organiza- tions to encourage positive media coverage\nI C. b. c. Designate a contact person at each local school to report to an established information center\nProduce video presentations of area schools for use by real estate offices, utility panies euid day care centers\ncom- Encourage community-wide multi-ethnic citizen/parent/ teacher/student committees for input into planning and decis ion-making: Establish building, district and multi-district 1. level committees which are racially, geographically and socio-economically representative to provide input and feedback on the operations of the schools and the districts\n87 01804  D. Work, with the Chamber of Commerce Committee on Education on its advocacy for public school activities: 1. 2. 3 . Expand the school/business partnerships\nHave a multi-district event to honor business part- ners in public schools\nEncourage the Chamber to continue existing such as the teacher programs appreciation rally and the Excellence in Education Awards for educators and students. Special needs will be addressed in each school district's desegregation plan Participation and programs are contingent on additional staffing and funds in PCSSD 8S 0180509Z.T0 Ct *  MH C ! Ml -x t  n. yiu  2 s  c hPah s s nt f\u0026lt; I 8 5 2 t r  c Ui{ IK H I ? t J kr I t i ih! iin n f ! ? I 8 ,1 11 3 u 3 RX = c s t? I ii 8 1 i t s I 3 s 3 {I ? ! t o 0  t 0 XT I ' u u u b b b I L L L L L L L. r r s ( * e t r s sWWW CHRISTOPHER HELLER FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS AiraiNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BLTLDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 Telephone (501) 376-2011 Fix No. (501) 376-2147 Dinxt No. 370-1506 MEMORANDUM TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DR. MAC BERND, SUPERINTENDENT DATE: EEBRUARY 22, 1993 I am writing to provide you a report about the significant developments in this case since the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved our desegregation plans and settlement agreement and to advise you about matters which are pending before the District Court. In its order approving the settlement plans and settlement agreement submitted by the parties, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that\" [i]t may be necessary, in order to make a smooth transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances.\" Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (8th Cir. 1990). All three school districts proposed modifications to the settlement plans. The District Court issued a forty-four page order on May 1, 1992 approving some of the proposed modifications and rejecting others. The four desegregation plans presently in effect (one for each of the three school districts and the interdistrict desegregation plan) have been revised to include the modifications authorized by the May 1, 1992 order. The following documents define the desegregation obligations of the Little Rock School District and the other parties to this case, and are available to each of you at the Administration Building if you do not have a personal copy: 1. Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement - March, 1989 (as revised September 28, 1989)2. 3. 4. 5. The orders Desegregation Plan - Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 (there was an order filed on June 1, 1992 which corrects four typographical errors found in the bound volume) Desegregation Plan - Pulaski County Special School District - April 29, 1992 Desegregation Plan - North Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan - April 29, 1992 which have been issued by the District Court since the publication of the desegregation plans have been mailed to each of you. A complete collection of court orders is maintained at the Administration Building. Jerry Malone (370-1553) and I (370-1506) are always available to answer any questions or concerns you may have about this case or about our district's implementation of our desegregation plan. The most pressing issues now before the Court concern the structure of the Little Rock School District's budget and the implementation of its desegregation plan. In October 1991, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring informed the Little Rock School District that it must be able to provide the Court with information which: \"(1) Accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation allegations, It On January 21, 1992, the District Court found that \"the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites\" and ordered the Little Rock School District to \"submit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan\" together with a long range budget projection and a long range revenue projection. On May 1, 1992 the District Court ordered the Little Rock School District to submit a revised budget. The Little Rock School District filed on June 1, 1992 a document titled \"LRSD Projected Revenue and Expense - 1992/93 -- 1996/97\". The Little Rock School District revised its budget projections based upon then current information and supplied the revised budget projections to the District Court on July 31, 1992. The Little Rock School District also filed a special status report which contained the budget proposal for the 1992-93 school year which had been approved by the Board. Following an August 3, 1992 hearing to discuss the Little Rock School District budget, the District Court issued an order on August 4 approving the proposed reductions except the elimination of a seventh period at McClellan Community High School. The 2Court also notified the Little Rock School District that it would require that music teacher positions in the seventh period at Henderson Junior High School be restored for the 1993-94 academy year. The Court promised that a more detailed order which would explain the Court's reasoning would follow. The detailed order was filed on December 30, 1992. The December order explained that the budget reductions made for the 1992-93 school year \"will all be monitored closely and may have to be restored if the Court determines the cuts are having a negative impact on the district's desegregation efforts\". The Court required the Little Rock School District to submit any future proposed budget changes to the Court and directed the Little Rock School District not to implement any changes prior to the Court's approval. The Court provided some insight into how future budget reduction proposals will be reviewed. For example, the Court expressed concern \"about the district's decisions to tamper with popular programs like gifted and talented, music, magnet features, and eliminating staff at schools that are successful (such as the established magnets) and those schools trying to be successful (such as the incentive schools and the new magnets, McClellan and Henderson).\" The Court also expressed concern about the impact of budget proposals on teacher morale and reductions which put the Little Rock School District at risk of non-compliance with State standards or statutes. The District Court also entered an order on November 5 concerning the impact of the 1992-93 budget reductions upon the magnet schools. The Court directed Little Rock School District to reinstate certain positions of the magnet schools and to present to the Court prior to pre-registration any changes in the magnet schools contemplated for the 1993-94 school year. Following the Board's decision on January 28, 1993 not to pursue a grant application to fund an Aerospace Technology School, the District Court notified the Little Rock School District that the hearing scheduled for February 1, 1993 to consider the Aerospace grant would instead be directed toward \"other issues of concern to the Court\". At that hearing, the Court expressed concern about the Little Rock School District's commitment to complying with its desegregation plan. The Court was particularly concerned that our budget make it difficult to discern budget priorities and to monitor spending on implementation of the desegregation plan. , The Court emphasized the need for good faith compliance with the desegregation plan in order for the Little Rock School District to eventually be released from District Court supervision and also emphasized that the Little Rock School District should make clear to the community that the desegregation plan is something to which we are committed. The result of the hearing is that the District Court will take a more active role in directing and monitoring the budget process and that the Little Rock School District will be required to hire one additional person to work on the budget. I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and you are all welcome to review it once it has been prepared, all previous hearings if anyone would like to review them). 3 (I have transcripts of almost a -9 e There will be a hearing at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, March 19, 1993 to review the effects of the Little Rock School District 1992-93 budget cuts which were addressed by the District Court in its December 30, 1992 order. The has Court asked me to remind you of its continuing concern about the Little Rock School District's budget process and to encourage you to attend the March 19, 1993 hearing. It would be helpful to review in advance of the hearing the budget cuts adopted by the Board this summer, together with the District Court's August 4 and December 30, 1992 orders concerning those cuts. I will continue to forward all orders to Dr. Bernd as soon as I receive them for immediate distribution to the Board. I will also provide periodic written reports to the Board concerning the legal proceedings in this case. 4CHRISTOPHER HELLER FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK A PARINEMHI? OF nrorVIDUAIJ AND FROFcSSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL 3LTLDING 400 WEST CAPITOL little ROCC, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 Telephone (501) 376-2011 Fk No. (501) 376-2147 Dirset No. 370-1506 MEMORANDUM TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DR. MAC BERND, SUPERINTENDENT DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1993 I am writing to provide you a repon about the significant developments in this case since the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved our desegregation plans and settlement agreement and to advise you about matters which are pending before the District Court. In its order approving the settlement plans and settlement agreement submitted by the parties, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that\" [i]t may be necessary, in order to make a smooth transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (Sth Cir. 1990). All three school districts proposed modifications to the settlement plans. The District Court issued a forty-four page order on May 1, 1992 approving some of the proposed modifications and rejecting others. The four desegregation plans presently in effect (one for each of the three school districts and the interdistrict desegregation plan) have been revised to include the modifications authorized by the May 1, 1992 order. The following documents define the desegregation obligations of the Little Rock School District and the other parties to this case, and are available to each of you at the Administration Building if you do not have a personal copy: 1. Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement - March, 1989 (as revised September 28, 1989)1. 3. 4. 5. The orders Desegregation Plan - Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 (there was an order filed on June 1, 1992 which corrects four typographical errors found in the bound volume) Desegregation Plan - Pulaski County Special School District - April 29, 1992 Desegregation Plan - North Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan - April 29, 1992 which have been issued by the District Coun since the publication of the desegregation plans have been mailed to each of you. A complete collection of court orders is maintained at the Administration Building. Jerry Malone (370-1553) and I (370-1506) are always available to answer any questions or concerns you may have about this case or about our district's implementation of our desegregation plan. The most pressing issues now before the Court concern the structure of the Little Rock School District's budget and the implementation of its desegregation plan. In October 1991, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring informed the Little Rock School District that it must be able to provide the Court with information which\n\"(1) Accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation allegations. II On January 21, 1992, the District Court found that \"the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites\" and ordered the Little Rock School District to \"submit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan\" together with a long range budget projection and a long range revenue projection. On May 1, 1992 the District Court ordered the Little Rock School District to submit a revised budget. The Little Rock School District filed on June 1, 1992 a document titled \"LRSD Projected Revenue and Expense - 1992/93 - 1996/97\". The Little Rock School District revised its budget projections based upon then current information and supplied the revised budget projections to the District Court on July 31, 1992. The Little Rock School District also filed a special status report which contained the budget proposal for the 1992-93 school year which had been approved by the Board. Following an August 3, 1992 hearing to discuss the Little Rock School District budget, the District Court issued an order on August 4 approving the proposed reductions except the elimination of a seventh period at McClellan Community High School. The 2Court als^otified the Little Rock School District that it would require that music teacher positionsf^he seventh period at Henderson Junior High School be restored for the 1993-94 academy year. The Court promised that a more detailed order which would explain the Court's reasoning would follow. The detailed order was filed on December 30, 1992. The December order explained that the budget reductions made for the 1992-93 school year \"will all be monitored closely and may have to be restored if the Court determines the cuts are having a negative impact on the district's desegregation efforts\". The Court required the Little Rock School District to submit any future proposed budget changes to the Court and directed the Little Rock School District not to implement any changes prior to the Court's approval. The Court provided some insight into how future budget reduction proposals will be reviewed. For example, the Court expressed concern \"about the district's decisions to tamper with popular programs like gifted and talented, music, magnet features, and eliminating staff at schools that are successful (such as the established magnets) and those schools trying to be successful (such as the incentive schools and the new magnets, McClellan and Henderson).\" The Court also expressed concern about the impact of budget proposals on teacher morale and reductions which put the Little Rock School District at risk of non-compliance with State standards or statutes. The District Court also entered an order on November 5 concerning the impact of the 1992-93 budget reductions upon the magnet schools. The Court directed Little Rock School District to reinstate certain positions of the magnet schools and to present to the Court prior to pre-registration any changes in the magnet schools contemplated for the 1993-94 school year. Following the Board's decision on January 28, 1993 not to pursue a grant application to fund an Aerospace Technology School, the District Court notified the Little Rock School District that the hearing scheduled for February 1, 1993 to consider the Aerospace grant would instead be directed toward \"other issues of concern to the Court\". At that hearing, the Court expressed concern about the Little Rock School District's commitment to complying with its desegregation plan. The Court was particularly concerned that our budget make it difficult to discern budget priorities and to monitor spending on implementation of the desegregation plan. The Court emphasized the need for good faith compliance with the desegregation plan in order for the Little Rock School District to eventually be released from District Court supervision and also emphasized that the Little Rock School District should make clear to the community that the desegregation plan is something to which we are committed, The result of the hearing is that the District Court will take a more active role in directing and monitoring the budget process and that the Little Rock School District will be required to hire one additional person to work on the budget. I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and you are all welcome to review it once it has been prepared, all previous hearings if anyone would like to review em). (I have transcripts of almost 3There will be a hearing at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, March 19, 1993 to review the effects of the Little Rock School District 1992-93 budget cuts which were addressed by the District Court in its December 30, 1992 order. The has Court asked me to remind you of its continuing concern about the Little Rock School District's budget process and to encourage you to attend the March 19, 1993 hearing. It would be helpful to review in advance of the hearing the budget cuts adopted by the Board this summer, together with the District Court's August 4 and December 30, 1992 orders concerning those cuts. I will continue to forward all orders to Dr. Bernd as soon as I receive them for immeriiare distribution to the Board. I will also provide periodic written reports to the Board concerning e legal proceedings in this case. 4S5 a-' A, Little Rock School District issa u VED June 1, 1993 JUN 2 1993 CKics of Cesegre^ :icn Wouiionng Mr. Donald M. Stewart, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent of Business Affairs Pulaski County Special School District 1500 Dixon Road P. 0. Box 8601 Little Rock, AR 72216 Dear Mr. Stewart: This letter is to inform you that a meeting should be scheduled to discuss the implementation of the pooling of Majority-to-Minority funds as required by the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. I would suggest that we meet sometime during the week of June 7. Please call Carol Hughett at 324-2009 to schedule an appointment. Sincerely, Ga: Ma: E ones hager of Resources and School Support cc: Bobby G. Lester Billy Bowles Mac Bernd Ann Brown Sam Jones Chris Heller Bob Morgan 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361TJ i i o ? (S B o 3 s o 3 a 3 Q. ?   a -4 I?? a* B (Ji i o S O It G3  3 a\n1 8 1 o s 8 V il yt O g c Q. co CQ 9 9 sr \" fii vt \u0026lt; o 3 % o to a. tt 9 3 9 I s 3 3* 9  3 9 9 9 3 a - 3 3 3  s. 9 B S s 3 51 2 S 3 a ? 3 O S a -n  \u0026amp; 5- 2 3 O 3 B  ii. S. B TJ \u0026amp; 1  5  9 U 3 B O 9 3 9 o  S co 3 M o \u0026gt; c 6 3 S  - m 03 c (O 9 \u0026lt; \u0026lt; Z* Z* W 9 9 O O 9 3 9 S rp 5 S 3 a- 9 9 3 CO I-- 4k Ki r  Oi Ki   00 K3   O Ki  Ki K4   03 00 bo o o c 5 9 1 ^2 Oi 'ui cn 9 cn S QI yi SS KJ Gi co UI 82 2 hi o (0 8 OO UI o Gi o C3 b N) CO \u0026lt;5 S S O o 2 ? w B B  \u0026lt; m (n St X  B 3 3 9 9 3 9 o a 7* 7* 2  B B CD CD F 0 rt   I S-S-OOr- \u0026gt; g* S S 3 S 3 3 2 3 B B B S S 3 O 9 9 a? 3 9 9 .3 3 9 ** ** in s ? 9 s  ? 2 I S cn tn S = o Q 2 2 \u0026lt; 0 0 0 9 9 3 11 3 3 5! 3 3 9 9 2 c N) s o 3 8 3 3 2 c 9 O B 0) 'g) 00 u u fe K3 UI UI S p p p  s s s s O) 03 O) K3 Oi I 01 O\u0026gt; 0\u0026gt; K\u0026gt; flO p 00 b\u0026gt; b CD 01 M O\u0026gt; 1 I  2. 9 s m m 9 2. 3 3 2 2. a a 3 S S  c c 2 = -o 1* 9 90 CD CD  3. 3 W \u0026lt;- 5- B S 5 ? 3 3 3 .^, s 11  S s  g ? s Ti Vi C tt 3 3 9 C 0 B ? tn 3 \u0026lt; 3 9  Tn O 3 S. 9 5  \u0026gt;n *3 2. 3 ?  3 2. 3  * \"Si a w s 9 8 3  3. \u0026lt; c 3 w s. bT 9 U) 0 Ki -sj -J co UI cn 111 UI .U M 00 *03 'tn 'o s s O) UI OO co 4k N3 'kJ S3 3 B 5 T3 B  3 9 3 o o o 3 IS II Q. O CD A S \u0026amp; C a (I 2 St 3 o 2 3 3 c 3 a cn I cn  2 3 B SL 00 s N3 8  N3 UI O K3 -* 0) O) K) O M 00 S?!*2 *Q 'a O '-tJ b '-M Q U M N O S O A A 9 O A O O) yi o w a p p UI M N3 00 co \u0026lt;9 UI Ki UI cn Q cn c\u0026lt;i O Ci Gi \"si 'oo 'tn tn 5 00 O Ki Ki 4K -* -\u0026gt;4 O 03 'cn 'tn 'jK '\u0026lt;D 6 00 Ki o cn o cn 8 y i 8 o Oi cn A Gi CD 00 00  N M -k N N3 -k O OO K3 o 2 'ui b) ui - 0\u0026gt; 2 UI O\u0026gt; M a bo UI 2 co (O tn 4k 00 t\u0026gt;3 *ui '.u *oo Cj3 cn co 'o '-\"J 'co $ Oi -u *4 -k Ki CJI co 8 03 Q) S s 9 n \u0026lt;n ti le CO n 0 3- (D Q. C (D O oo 2 '6 Ki oo 'co K3 03 1 00 s M 03 o N3 UI CO C*) *00 Ki \u0026lt;O 'co M M S M S M W CD p CO Ki S S UI Ui cn o\u0026gt; UI co M CO 'oo 00 O 03 O CO co UI C^ Ci o UI co Ki co 'oo UI cn Ki K\u0026gt; 't3 *03 _ 00 00 o M lU C*i si co *4 S'cn Ki .U 00 cn ci b 2 ss Ki K .K 'Oi s UI N3 K3 03 'co 'q 00 UI cn *\u0026gt;4 w s 00 co lU 00 lU UI b 03 K3 00 St o UI M 00 N3 s g':i \u0026gt;4 O UI N3 g co 2 O 3 m 3 co \u0026lt; 2 0 fi) 3 (D 3 (O hJ  \u0026lt;O S CO  to co!' A) 8 2  6 \u0026lt; O 2 8 co w $ 9 tt 5 o 9 tt IO fo 2 2 \u0026lt; 00 9 B $ 9 -n c 3 a 0 O :o co o 2\u0026gt; CO 1*3PCSSD PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT June 9, 1993 JUN 1 1 1993 Office o( Deseycijaficn bicniiofirto Mr. Gary Jones Manager of Resources and School Support Little Rock School District 810 West Markham 1500 Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock. Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Jones: As per our conversation this morning, attached is a work sheet which shows the the 1992-93 school year of implementing the language in the Settlement Agreement regarding pooling of M-to-M funds received for students attending interdistrict schools. effect during The work sheet does not include pre-kindergarten students attending those schools. II\"f it -i-s ultimately decided that funds are to be received for those students, this calculation needs to be revisited and any necessary adjustment made at that time. The attached work sheet indicates that a check from you in the amount of $167,220 will tentatively settle this matter for 1992-93 until a decision students. is made on the funding of pre-kindergarten Please let me know if I can supply additional information. Sincerely, . Donald M. Stewart, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent - Business Affairs bay Enc. 1 cc: Bobby G. Lester Mac Bernd Billy Bowles Ann Brown i/ Chris Heller Sam Jones Bob Morgan \u0026lt;*\u0026gt; s o \u0026lt;o o cn _i co o o 03 O\u0026gt; gctc Ss I O 55  LU S H t O I Q S (73 5 UL o OS O Q -Z. CO O o o 0. Q_ co 05 CO cm' c Lli oi  cn oi CM m Q cn co o z I z Q \u0026lt; 0. cn Q Z  LL cn cn O O (jy cn O \u0026lt; 0. LL 2 Q Ul _i O o 0. \u0026lt; H o LU I E^ 01 Z' Qi z\n I LU I 2 Q \u0026lt; I d co CM O cm' 05 co I co CO 051 tn _ /\\ I co co co o o co CM in co CO ee^ o o co co CM O CM cm' 05 CM CM (n cn O o cn cn O \u0026lt; a. LX. 2 CM in co CM in co CO co O CM CM co o CM CO o o o_ o o CM fA- co o CO o o m co  CE I z o G CM CO W- o 05 o' CM CO CO O o' GO e)* cn z LU 2 LU Q LU o O CL \u0026lt; 1- o LU I- \u0026lt; c o z Q Z D LL 2 Q \u0026lt; I d m CO CM CM_ oo' CO CM co co co 05 CO CM O CM m co\" in CL (n \u0026lt; t- O 1- o 05 o GO CM (A LU \u0026lt; a: LU 0 \u0026lt; CC LU \u0026gt; \u0026lt; CO 05 CM to (A co o s o o co co \u0026lt;z\u0026gt; G CO o o in co 05 CO ee\u0026gt; LO LO co' LO co o (A O z o 5  z Q cn c o H (2 LU I o\" co cn O X LU 13 tn z LU 2 \u0026amp; cn O Z O Q Q Z Q tn a: o (3 LU 5 o q' cn cn CJ 0. Cu 3 a I-  O I 2 I o T 2 Z 1 2 I o T 2 LU I- Z \u0026lt; Q tn tn tn 0 \u0026lt; H o Q W (n o 0. Q \u0026lt; CL W Q Z  LL. z o I 2 I o T 2 z I 2 I o T 2 \u0026lt; H o I- Q CO QC Q LU -I o o \u0026lt; o Q LU LU o LU Z I- Z LU Q D W * \u0026gt; z CL CO 2 Q \u0026lt; I d co CM I ijC 0 LU Q \u0026lt; q: ci o o co co co co co CO o in co cn _j O O z o (73 O cc H- W Q CC LU H Z 2 Q \u0026lt; I d m O 5 05 CM co CO co cn _i o o z o cz) H O Z 00 Q cn o CL Q tn tz -1 O) \u0026lt; t- O Q W (f) a (L CM r- 1 ic: cn LU Q \u0026lt; 0 0 co 2 UJ i d 2 LU _l LU CE LU it\n\u0026lt; m \u0026lt; O t- Q w cn o 0. Q cr LU z Q (/) E 2 LU _1 LU LU Z 2 O X \u0026lt; o Q W 0^^803 ri JSSSf' /I'-- e-,-/ Little Rock School District n June 1, 1993 JUN 2 1993 Cfiics of Cesegregsycn Woi oring Mr. Donald M. Stewart, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent of Business Affairs Pulaski County Special School District 1500 Dixon Road P. O. Box 8601 Little Rock, AR 72216 Dear Mr. Stewart: This letter is to inform you that a meeting should be scheduled to discuss the implementation of the pooling of Majority-to-Minority funds as required by the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. I would suggest that we meet sometime during the week of June 7. Please call Carol Hughett'at 324-2009 to schedule an appointment. Sincerely, Ga: Ma: ones hager of Resources and School Support cc: Bobby G. Lester Billy Bowles Mac Bernd Ann Brown Sam Jones Chris Heller Bob Morgan 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 EIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. IjR-C-32-865 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS, LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS IN..SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL l.ntroduction The settlement agreement in this case requires that the case smissed with prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD. settlement agreement was approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and by this court, but the required order of dismissal was overlooked and has not been entered. In accordance with the I-'' terms of the settlement agreement, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD are entitled to an order of dismissal. The \"RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE LRSD,\" which was appi^oved by this court and the court of appeals as Attachment B to the settlement agreement, contains the following requirement\n It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, PqoX Schgoj District -  ______ ASllftQi_Distrigt Np.Le et al. No. LR-C-82-866 and cases Western Division, entitled Xj_gulaski County Special consolidated therein and their predecessors {includincr. but not limited to. Cooper v. Aaron. Norwood Tucker v iJOOlgl P,i?trict) (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed Kail vi AVdiad with 3. so  11 \u0026lt;=. Ot ' 1 iprejudice as to the LRSD and the former and current members of board education named in the Litigation. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans.\" its of in Pulaski County Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2. The settlement agreement also requires that this case be dismissed with respect to PCSSD and NLRSD. Settlement Agreement, Attachment C, p. 2 and Attachment D, p. 2. The settlement agreement contains the following \"Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua And The Districts\": \"Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans.\" Settlement Agreement, p. 19. This litigation ended with the approval of the settlement agreement except that this court has retained jurisdiction. in 900 accordance with the agreement. to resolve issues related to implementation of the desegregation plans and enforcement of the settlement agreement. been entered. Arqrumant An order cf dismissal, however, has not yet The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved the parties' settlement agreement on December 12, 1990. LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371 (Sth Cir. 1990) . The court of appeals directed the district court, on remand, \"to approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them.\" I^. at 1394. Kl.d hV) AVGIMJ On January 18, 1991, this court 01 :il 96 OS/I I 2 \u0026amp;ordered that \"[tjhe parties' settlement agreement is hereby approved as written by them.\" According to the terms of the settlement agreement set forth above, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD were entitled to an order of dismissal with prejudice upon this court's approval of the settlement agreement. The order required by the settlement agreement will not affect this court's authority, as described in the settlement agreement, to retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the desegregation plans and to conduct proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement or the desegregation plans. The question of whether a certain component of the settlement agreement should be implemented ha arisen once before. In LRSD V. PCSSD. 971 F.2d 160 (Sth Cir. 1992) , the court of appeals confronted the issue of whether the district court was required to extend certain millages in accordance with Item M of the settlement agreement. The district court had \"thought it 'unwise to infer from the court of appeals' approval of the settlement agreement that [the district court was] required to extend the omitted millages,\" Id. at 164. The Eighth Circuit said: \" (\"What the district court failed to recognize is that we directed it to 'approve the parties' settlement agreement ag.__written by them.\" \"[A]s written by them,\" the settlement agreement included Item M, which corrected the problem of the omitted millages The extension of the omitted millages is therefore settled as the law of the case.\" Li. at 165 (citations omitted, emphasis in original). 3  iOO haiH vj Avaiaa S6 Ot 11 11 : i IOne of the reasons the district court had given for declining o implement Item M was that even though the court of appeals had approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, it had not specifically mentioned Item M in its opinion. Xd. at 164. The court of appeals made it clear that the parties were entitled\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_720","title":"Staffing","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","School employees","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Staffing"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/720"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["34 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nUA8T NAME |Banr [Wilkins [Butts [Foti Jones Bailey [Romontio iSurrough Clark [McMahan ^Bell Hilburn I, Keller jPelen Aukes [Moore Meier Talley farther 'Sykes iPace Evans [McKniflht [Frasier Batson [Person [Mangan carter jLowe Sarver McGuire Warren Guppy Roe iZollar ROCKEFELLER STAFF 89 - 90 FIRST NAME RACE SEX GRADE FULL TIME iMyrtle [Margaret iValencia Beth Lucia Angela Nina 'Mary Ann [Sarah jMariiou Priss r iKarfa [Dana .Pat k/ickie jFrancile Judy [Carolyn Kitty I Delois [Katie T Rebecha Lillie ,Doreen Ann t----------- Pam jAnn Lillie Martha Doris Steve jcindy [Georgia IMary Kay T iMargaret COUNT: W J F [Teacher-Infants \n------------------------------------------r I W I F |Teacher-3 Yr. Qins 1.00 B F Teacher- 4 YrOldi 1.00 1 00 I i I F [Teacher-4 Yr. GIdl 1.00 i 1 ~\n------------------1-------- ! W I F Teacher- 4 Yr Old: W t-B T 1.00 [ F Kindergarten t W ' F Kindergarten W__: F [1st Grade ! W F .1 st Grade i I W j F\nist Grade w t ! w I ! F iand Grade F find Grade I W j F jSrti Grade B F 3rd Grade  W I F 4th Grade I T I s I i F 4th Grade I i 1.00 I 1.00 1 I T 1.00 1.00 1.00 i 1,00 1.00 t - 1,00 i 1.00 1.00 w B 1 I I i I I 1,00 L |Sth Grade j 1.00 j I F iSth Grade I W ! F ^th Grade 1.00 J I 1.C0 B F leth Gra^ I, I a I F Gpec. Ed t T J- W W W w B W B W W w w w w I w 36 F lArt F [Music F [P. E. F Chap. 1 Math ! 1.00 i  1.00 ! 1 00 I I 1.00 i 1.00 1 F Chap. 1 Reading j F [Principal F [Asst. Principal F [Counselor F [Media Spec. M [speech Therapist F [Nurse F kSifled/Talented I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1,00 ! 1.00 j 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.50 \"1 F jcomputer Spec. [ 1.00 F iFamity Life Spec. I 0.25 4LRSD EMPLOYEE COUNT 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 Certified Non-certified TOTAL 1,972 1,359 3,331 2,048 1,465 3,513 2,043 1,651 3,694 2,056 1,859 3,915LRSD teacher statistics 1-20-9L Democrat SCHOOL AVG. EXPERIENCE AVQ. WHITE BLACK AGE TEACHERS TEACHERS HIGH SCHOOL I other' RACES' Central Hall Mann Metro Parkview 12 9  \u0026gt;11:. 13 43 \u0026lt;-\u0026lt;\u0026gt;42. \u0026lt;' 42 \u0026gt;\n\u0026gt;.:45\u0026lt;\" 44 71 53 36 26 42 33 22 22 4 20 1 1 ! JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Dunbar Fair. \\ Forest Heights Pulaski Heights Soutnwest McClellan Henderson Alternative Cloverdale Mabelvale 7 9 10 7 \u0026lt;5 10 1 3 42 '\u0026lt;\u0026lt;v4d/:\u0026lt;'' 41 \u0026lt;'41- 39 40 40 .34 38 39 21 45 35 41 25 51 35 4 42 33 ELEMENTARY Booker Bale Brady Badgett McDermott Carver \u0026gt; Baseline Fair Park-  Forest Park Franklin  - Garland Gibbs \u0026gt; \u0026gt; \u0026gt; Western Hills - Jefferson Cloverdale Dodd \u0026gt; Meadowcliff Mitchell Rockefeller- Geyer Springs Pulaski Heights Rightsell Romine Stephens  \u0026lt; \u0026gt; Washington : Williams Wilson Woodruff Mabelvale Terry Fulbright Ish Otter Creek Wakefield Watson________ SOURCE: LRSD 7 9 1 4 13 \u0026gt;  3' 5 11 8 8 1 10 10 3 3 10 8 6 4 6 11 9 8 3 9 10 5 3 9 9 9 5 4 _5_ 40 -\u0026lt;41 \u0026lt;\n39 41 41. 35 37 \u0026lt;\u0026gt;'43 \u0026lt; 38 39 39 42 42 42 39 41 43 41 41 37 39 41 40 40 34 39 43 41 38 39 44 43 40 41 _aa___ ..... .. . 31.... : 14 22 12 24 30 15 10 13 26 15 19 14 24 11 16 18 10 21 10 18 10 13 13 ' 42 25 - :18 \u0026lt; 26 24 , W\u0026gt;23... .  ''^'''' '\"9\"  16 16 __2i_ 20 17 22 12 24 17 21 3 13 12 t 2 16 10 7 7 9 7 12 11 9 6 15 8 14 24 11 16 18 10 21 10 18 10 13 13 42 25 : 18 9 26 24 9 16 16 24 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\n : 5 J MICHAEL STOREY / Arkansas DemocratLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 February 6, 1992 TO: Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney FROM: James Jennings, Associate Superintendent for Desegregation Monitoring and Community Services SUBJECT: Pupil/Teacher Ratios The North Central Accreditation Standards state the following concerning the ratio of pupils to teachers: 24.02 Pupli/Professional Staff Ratio. The ratio of pupils to teachers and other professional staff members shall not exceed 20 to 1. In computing the ratio, the school may include the instructional responsibilities of all professional staff assigned to the building plus the time devoted to instruction by other professional personnel. The attachment to this memo provides the pupil/teacher ratio for each elementary school in the Little Rock School District. NCA provisions listed above are used to compute pupil/teacher The ratios. The staffing information is taken directly from the NCA rts developed at the beginning of the school year. The icliowing certificated positions are included in the staffing counts: - Prekindergarten teachers - Kindergarten teachers - Grade level teachers - Special subject area teachers - Building principal - Assistant principal - Guidance counselor - Media specialist/librarianLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY PUPIL/TEACHER RATIOS School 1-31-92 Enrollment Staffing Count P/T Ratio Badgett Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Hgts. Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff 222 361 332 630 413 606 518 388 309 327 410 497 534 275 258 349 198 483 509 511 432 321 363 357 296 401 362 237 526 474 840 470 334 499 396 231 19 29 24 45 30 43 37 25 23 25 24 37 2 27 20 31 23 31 35 32 26 25 22 22 27 30 27 26 29 31 50 31 21 34 27 17 11.68 12.44 13.83 14.00 13.77 14.09 14.00 15.52 13.43 13.08 17.08 13.43 16.69 10.19 12.90 11.26 8.61 15.58 14.54 15.97 16.61 12.84 16.50 16.22 10.96 13.36 13.40 9.11 18.13 15.29 16.80 15.16 15.90 14.68 14.67 13.59 IA Little Rock School District November 20, 1992 RECEIVED Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation and Monitoring Heritage West Building NOV 2 5 1992 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Ann: Thank you for inviting me to the meeting in your office to discuss matters related to the desegregation plan. Per our discussion, this letter is submitted to provide an update on the Staffing Committee for Incentive Schools that is required in the desegregation plan. At the inception of the Incentive Schools, the purpose of the staffing committee was to determine the staffing needs at each school and then develop criteria for principal and staff selection based on a needs assessment. An interview team was to have been selected from members of the staffing committee to interview and make recommendations to the principals. It is my understanding that although an interview team was established and recommendations were made by this committee, the contracted agreement actually dictated which teachers were placed in the schools. Therefore, at this time, Ms. Arma Hart will assist me in instituting a new staffing committee that will determine the present staffing needs at each of the schools and develop criteria for principal and staff selection needed in the future. Each principal has submitted names of patrons and staff personnel to serve on this committee. In the future, when positions become vacant, the interview team will be involved in the hiring process and will make recommendations to the principals, goal of this administration to have quality staff in the It is a Incentive Schools who are committed to the goals of the program. A District-wide Staffing Committee for Incentive Schools meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 9, 1992, from 5:30 to 7:00 p.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building. If you need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Janet Bernard Associate Superintendent cc: Marie Parker 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 {rrsw 3 a 'Is t J D APR 2 S 1553 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET Office of Desogregation ! .'io\ni! Big LITTLE ROCK AR 72201 April 28, 1993 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Mac Bernd, Superintendent  SUBJ: Recommendations Concerning Certified Staff Reemployment for 1993-94 School Year The following attachments are submitted for your consideration: 1, Section 1 is a list of certified personnel who have stated that they wish to resign or retire at the end of their current contract. 2. Section 2 is a list of intern teachers who are not being recommended for reemployment at this time. These individuals will be eligible to apply for announced vacancies for the 1993- 94 school year. 3. Section 3 is a list of certified personnel who are recommended for reemployment with conditions pending recertification. 4. Section 4 is a list of certified personnel who are recommended for reemployment with conditions pending course deficiency removal. 5. Section 5 is a list of certified personnel whose positions are funded with federal monies who are recommended for reemployment with the following conditions: Provided that if federal financial assistance for the position in which you are assigned is not forthcoming pursuant to pending applications, or such assistance as is granted for such position is less that the amount applied for as well as staffing needs, then the Board of Education may non-renew, terainate contract. or modify thisPage 2 6. Section 6 is a list of vocational teachers who do not have enough students enrolled in their classes to justify their continued employment. They are recommended for reemployment with the following condition: If a sufficient number of students fail to enroll in your progreun, the Board of Directors shall have the right to non-renew, terminate or modify your contract. It is futher recommended that contracts be renewed for certified personnel who have not been sent notification of a recommendation for non-renewal or termination and who have indicated that they wish to return to the District in 1993- 94. Final assignments will be made in accordance to staffing needs and in compliance with negotiated agreements.NAME Anderson, Jean Johnson, Nicole Raney, Sarah Scott, Susan Sprinkle, Marie Taylor, Debra White, Lynda Wooley, Angela Brewer, Rosemary Brown, Martha Calvin, Francella Davis, Carolyn Dietz, Joan Elders, Oliver Glaze, Diana Hooks, Naomi Hrishikesan, Ruth Loss, George Loss, Kathleen SECTION 1 RESIGNATIONS/RETIREES 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 POSITION SCHOOL Resignations French Gibbs Third Grade Kindergarten First Grade Fifth Grade Computer Tech Asst Principal First Grade Retirees Social Studies Media Specialist Special Education Math Home Economics Coach Principal Librarian Social Studies Coach Principal Wilson Brady Baseline Dodd Cloverdale Jr Gibbs Jefferson Hall Meadowcliff Jefferson Otter Creek/Chicot Central Hall Watson Forest Parkview Southwest Pulaski Hgts ElemRESIGNATIONS/RETIREES (Cont'd) (Section 1) NAME POSITION SCHOOL Muldrew, Jerome Palmer-Walker, Sue Rogers, Sue Tadlock, Mary Williams, Myrna Zimmerman, Earl Retirees Soc Stud Coord Fifth Grade Librarian Specialist Second Grade Director Central Rightsell Dodd Planning \u0026amp; Evaluation Meadowcliff Staff DevelopmentNAME Adams, Pamela Andrews, Sharon Battershell, Mary Divings, Mary Bradberry, Alice Buckelew, Mackie Burgess, Melissa Charles, Kimberly Clemons, Elizabeth Collins, Julie Cookus, Jerry Crommett, Joe Fleming, Brenda Ford, Roger Gates, Kathy Guinn, Hubert Hardin, Cassandra Hively, Lynn Holmes, Margaret Howard, Dianne SECTION 2 INTERN TEACHERS 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 POSITION SCHOOL Fifth Grade Math Specialist Chemistry Reading Spec Math Special Ed English Reading Art Math Asst English Math Asst First Grade Second Grade Math Asst. Fifth Grade Kindergarten Math Asst First Grade Third Grade Watson Carver McClellan Washington Franklin Forest Heights Central Southwest Woodruff Dunbar Pulaski Hgts Jr Mabelvale Jr Fair Park Ish Central Gibbs Garland Henderson Jefferson TerryINTERN TEACHERS (Cont'd) (Section 2) NAME POSITION SCHOOL Jackson, Mona Third Grade Fulbright Jackson, Vernita Special Ed Dodd Kennedy, Cynthia Math Asst Pulaski Hgts Jr Kunowski, Diane Math Asst Southwest Logan, Andrew Physical Ed Dunbar Marsh, Edward Math Central McBride, Barbara Speech Bale Merry, Susan Lrng Fnd Pulaski Hgts Jr Naylor, Sandra Fifth Grade Garland Nunn, Berthena Theme Specialist Franklin Parker, Charlotte Vocational Health Metropolitan Rhodes, Billy Sixth Grade Washington Robinson, David Band Director McClellan Saylor, Neville Special Ed Woodruff Seale, Carolyn Fourth Grade Terry Shepherd, Paula English Pulaski Hgts Jr Slayton, Pamela Civics McClellan Sproles, Tonya Second Grade Washington Taylor, Monica First Grade Garland Taylor, Travis Band Director Central Thomas, Nehemiah Social Studies Alt Lrng Center Thrasher, Eunice Speech Ish/Otter CreekINTERN TEACHERS (Cont'd) (Section 2) NAME POSITION SCHOOL Walters, Alice Kindergarten Pulaski Hgts Elem Webb, Thomas Math Cloverdale Jr All other certified personnel who were hired as intern teachers and who might have been omitted from this list due to oversight are also not recommended for reemployment at this time.NAME Condition: SECTION 3 CONDITIONAL LIST PENDING RECERTIFICATION 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 SCHOOL Completion of renewal of teacher's certificate valid for the 1993-94 school year. Alexander, Cora Henderson Bass, Mattie Central Bateman, Frances Gibbs Battershell, Mary McClellan Berman, Linda M. Woodruff Bernard, Janet Administration Brandt, Nancy Western Hills Capoot, Michael Cloverdale Jr Chambers, Anthony Cloverdale Jr Coon, Sue Central Crenshaw, Ora Ish Falls, Jacqueli Southwest Farlow, Amelia Parkview Fowler, Millicent Wakefield Hanley, Georgette Pulaski Hgts Elem Hartman, Kristi Geyer Springs Hicks, Carla Wilson CONDITIONAL LISTCONDITIONAL LIST (Section 3) NAME SCHOOL Hunter, Thelma Forest Heights James, Brenda Central Jones, Jack Cloverdale Jr Kennedy, Malinda Pulaski Hgts Jr Knight, Burl Pulaski Hgts Jr Langston, Pamela Mann Loya, Samuel Central Lusk, Jennifer Parkview Mahnken, Susan McDermott Malone, Dorothy Stephens McClendon, Joanne Central Morey, Donna Fair Parker, Marie Student Assignment Pleasant, Carwin Booker Richardson, Donald Pulaski Hgts Jr Roy, Portia Stephens Schult, Shala Shehane, Margaret Science/Envir Ed IRC Fair Shelton, Sherrie Mabelvale Elem Slayton, Pamela McClellan Smith, Harry Mann Snowden, Sherrie FairCONDITIONAL LIST (Section 3) NAME SCHOOL Talburt, Rebecca Southwest Taylor, Dianne Forest Heights Thrasher, Beverly Central Value, Terri Badgett Volsen, David Parkview Walker-Wheeler, Lisa Henderson Washington, Anne Williams Watson, Fredonia Rockefeller Wetherington, Edna Adult Education Wilder, Robert Fair Williams, Cynthia Henderson Williams, Gary Henderson Williams, Joyce Parkview Williams, Leslie Central Williams, Myrna MeadowcliffNAME SECTION 4 CONDITIONAL PENDING COURSE DEFICIENCY REMOVAL 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 POSITION SCHOOL Condition: Completion of valid courses. Acre, Glendon Counselor Dunbar Arick, Joyce Marketing Education Central Bailey, Angela Counselor Cloverdale Elem. Bailey, Jack Physical Education Chicot Banks, Rickey Elementary Garland Bettis, Paula Elementary Carver Brooks, Sharon Asst. Principal Washington Buehling, Cynthia Elementary Western Hills Burchett, Carletta Chapter I Reading Stephens Cannon, Sharron G/T Mabelvale Jr. Castell, Tony Special Education SW/Pul Hgts Jr Chambers, Anthony Coaching Cloverdale Jr. Clark, Nancy Career Orientation Mabelvale Jr. Colburn, Melissa Curr Spec/G\u0026amp;T McClellan Coleman, Jon Elementary Washington Collier, Cleophis General Science Henderson Collins, Peggy Kindergarten Pulaski Hgts Elem Copeland, Jacquelyn Elementary Cloverdale Elem. Cox, Angela Life Science MannCONDITIONAL DEPENDING COURSE DEFICIENCIES (Section 4) NAME POSITION SCHOOL Crobsy, Susan Elementary Franklin Ezell, Regina Elementary Washington Faubel, Virginia General Coop. Ed. Parkview Flanigan, Laura Mathematics Dunbar Gallant, Jennifer Health Pulaski Hgts Jr. Goodnight, Shirley V. Home Economics Pulaski Hgts Jr. Goodwin, Katherine Elementary Meadowcliff Grayson, Kayren Elementary Gibbs Hansen, Mary Ann Physical Education Mitchell Hogg, Jacqueline Geography Pulaski Hgts Jr. Hunt, Marietta Kindergarten Forest Park Hunter, Thelma Reading McClellan Ingram, Jennifer Geometry/Algebra McClellan Jacobs, Mary Health Henderson Jefferson, Cynthia Elementary Western Hills Kidd, Cleortius Coaching Mann Kinder, James Art Booker King, Jeri General Coop. Ed. McClellan Lincoln, Robert Physical Science Mann Little, Valerie Geography McClellan Lloyd, Emily Instrumental Music Mann Lloyd, Julia Kindergarten Cloverdale Elem. Malone, Dorothy Elementary Stephens Malone, Hosea General Science HallCONDITIONAL PENDING COURSE DEFICIENCY REMOVAL (Section 4) NAME POSITION SCHOOL McFadden, Charles Reading Cloverdale Jr. McSwain, Joyce Algebra Mann Middlebrooks, Susan G/T Southwest Moseley, Fran Arkansas History Cloverdale Jr. Mosley, Brenda Economics McClellan Nesmith, Estella Elementary Carver Norrell, Sherry Chapter I Reading Meadowcliff Norton, Gary Coaching Mann Pearson, Boyce Elementary Ish Peek, Peggy Special Education Geyer Springs Purifoy, Jimmy Instructional Music Stephens Redwood, Yolanda Kindergarten Ish Remley, O.C. Coaching Mann Rhodes, Billy Elementary Washington Robinson, John Asst. Principal Mabelvale Jr. Routen, Irma Elementary Woodruff Samons, Kathryn Spanish Cloverdale Jr. Shelton, Gail Special Education Rightsell Sims, Shirley Kindergarten Cloverdale Elem. Smith, Harry Health Mann Stiedle, Joyce G/T Henderson Toran, Steve Elementary ChicotCONDITIONAL PENDING COURSE DEFICIENCY REMOVAL (Section 4) NAME POSITION SCHOOL Turner, Diane G/T Mann Van Pelt, Sharon Chapter I Reading Cloverdale Elem Walker-Wheeler, Lisa Instrumental Music Henderson Wallace, Rodney Elementary Pulaski Hgts Elem Washington, Ruby Mathematics Henderson Wilson, Tammi Elementary Otter Creek Zies, Mary Physical Education WilliamsSECTION 5 FEDERAL PROGRAMS 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 NAME NAME Chapter I Reading Teachers Elementary School Averitt, Ann Mahnken, Susan Balenko, Mary Mazzanti, Hariette Betton, Ira Miller, Emma Bivings, Mary Norrell, Sherry Burchett, Carlette Odgen, Marilyn Burgin, John Person, Pam Charles, Kathleen Preslar, Kathryn Couch, Martha Rowe, Margo Davis, Dorothy Runion, Dianne Dumas, Josephine Schoemaker, Edna Finkbeiner, Debbie Schwartz, Cathy Gershner, Vicki Sebourn, Karen Ghant, Janet Shells, Geneva Gray, Lou Ann Smith, Bill Hall, Carolyn Spencer, Lynda Hays, Linda Steelman, Carolyn Hester, Susan Throneberry, Barbara Hodoway, Helen Washington, Juanita Keown, Ada Yeager, Judith Maddox, CindyFEDERAL PROGRAMS (Cont'd) (Section 5) NAME NAME Chapter I Mathmatics Teachers Elementary School Adams, Janet Kovach, Lillian Baker, Susie Lewis, Janice Beard, Elmer McGee, Suzanne Beard, Susan McDonald, Mary Bradberry, Alice Nagel, Diana Bryant, Carolyn Page, Nell Craig, Deborah Powell, Edith Daneshmandi, Kathryn Schwerin, Ruth Davis, Yvonne Snowden, Sallie Fair, Dixie Stiles, Donna Fowler, Earlene Tarkington, Susan Hall, Gracie Thompson, Sandra Hicks, Barbara Watson, Ann Jacuzzi, Marilyn Williams, Peggy James, Rita Wroten, Myrthene Jones, Docia Kodell, ValerieFEDERAL PROGRAMS (Cont'd) (Section 5) NAME NAME Chapter I Reading Teachers Secondary Schools Bass, Mattie Magee, Mildred Berman, Linda McKinney, Rebecca Carter, Mary Robinson, Susie Cobbs, Mary Chapter I Math Teachers Secondary Schools Cheatham, Guy Hively, Lynn Collins, Julie Kennedy, Cynthia Crommett, Joe McMurray, Victor Davis, Phylesia Pike, Perry Barnes, Emma Gerald, Nellie Guppy, Georgia Jones, Mary Compensatory Reading Teachers Secondary Schools Southerland, Terry Tarbot, Melinda Taylor, Dianne Thurman, Suzanne McCanell, Ethelene Van Pelt, Sharon Moore, Susanne Wickcliffe, Alice North, Morisetta Williams, Nanette Singh, DonnaFEDERAL PROGRAMS (Section 5) NAME NAME Math Teachers Dunbar, Kathy Richardson, Donald Knowiski, Diane Uketui, Ike Nichols, Robert Conditional Carl Perkins Funding Ferguson, Joseph Raymond, Diane Vocational Evaluator Vocational Counselor Swihart, Barbara Data Entry Clerk Vinsant, Marie Tech Prep Coordinator Watson, Clyde Vocational EvaluatorNAME SECTION 6 CONDITIONAL PENDING METROPOLITAN ENROLLMENT 1993-94 School Year April 28, 1993 POSITION Berry, Darrell TV Production Beyah, Rosie Word Processing Carter, Earl Auto Body Collie, Steve Printing Eackles, Victor Auto Technology Evans, Rick Printing Fornero, Dan Computer Programming Fortson, Gwyn Welding Gay, Bob Radio Broadcasting Grummer, Carl Drafting Harris, Bill Electronics Havens, Don Air/Heating Hines, Scottie Cosmetology Kirkpatrick, Terry Printing Parker, Charlotte Health Perry, Mitchell Printing Purdy, Ray Computer Roberts, L. B. Auto Technology Skipper, J. C. Auto Body Soderling, Linda Cosmetology Stroud, Royce Res Construction Thurman, Suzanne Commercial Food.X. RECE5VSP I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MAY 1 0 '993 Baseline Elementary School 3623 Baseline Road Phone 570-4150 Olfice of Desegregation Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Monitoring April 27, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS, I The faculty and staff of Baseline Elementary wish to issue a strong protest against the proposal to eliminate the computer lab attendant at our school. Baseline is an open-space, area school with special needs. of the instructional curriculum will be greatly diminished by the removal of this aide. the effectiveness We feel Baseline, as an open area school, already receives less funding than many district schools, and consequently has fewer available resources. The computer lab has been a great asset in attracting Southwest Little Rock residents to our school, which was designated The elimination of our computer attendant will destroy the effectiveness of one of our most productive and visible assets. a computer school. Our computer program is not a \"pull'-out\" program. Equity in education is evidenced in our computer lab where each student is working on his/her appropriate level toward a spec'i\"fic academic goal. We, as a staff, ask that you consider the special needs of our students. Even with teacher training, the students will not receive the same benefits I they have been receiving from our extremely well-planned, well-executed  computer program if our lab- atten-d---a--n--t is -r-e-m---o--v--e--d-. Our teachers and our lab attendant have a special, very productive working relationship that should not be sacrificed. Such a sacrifice would be counter-productive to achieving Sincerely, /Jn the district academic objectives at Baseline. ry- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET ---- 72201 little rock, ARKANSAS PT,KASE POST please post! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 23, 1993 All Employees Mac Bernd, Superintendent of Schools BUDGET reduction recommendations As you know, the District's faster rate than its revenues. . ways to curb our expenses and bring them i annual expenditures are growing at a we are looking for For that reason, --------- - line with our revenues. would like to invite you If you have ideas I ----- cut our expenditures. . would very much appreciate having your send it through the !------ consider your suggestions may carefully of Directors. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. to ways we can to make suggestions j that might be helpful, i thoughts in writing. You I will very as You school mail to my office. and share them PACK UP THE ABACUS SYSTEM AND SEND IT BACK Do not bipy additional computers There are sell them with the Board for the reading remedial specialists currently 17 older computers in our building that are never used^ Shorten the work day of the supervision aides (assigned to playground and lunch duty) and/or decrease the number of aides assigned per school Instead of cutting the hours of the media clerks, allow them to spend 2-5 hours doing clerical work in the school office instead of hiring additional personnel to work in school offices Shorten the calendar year for administrative staff Sell Che IRC building and landApril 28, 1993 Dr. Mac Bernd, Superintendent Little Rock Public Schools Izard \u0026amp; Markham Little Rock, Ar Dear Dr. Bernd: 72201 In response to your memo reguesting cuts, I would like to offer the following: First of all positions. suggestions for budget , do NOT cut the computer lab attendant These employees perform invaluable services to our students and teachers. in the efforts to meet educational needs and objectives. No amount of computer training provided by the district will equip the teachers to be able to use the computer labs at optimal efficacy. ---- These lab attendants even more providing for the have special training and. important, gj?.p.e,r.i.h.d.e, in using the labs^ special needs of individual students, monitoring the progress of students, and responding to teacher requests These Tandy computer important, ejSEexlD.S.e , regarding student needs and progress. , labs have an excellent service record and the Josten's , as implemented by our highly necessary lab programs, implementea oy nigny xau attendants, are meeting the needs of individual students. To eliminate the position of the computer lab attendants will render our computer programs ridiculously ineffective. To eliminate the computer lab attendants and turn around and buy ten new computers, complete with the necessary in-school software and training, to be used in the reading wiring, labs, seems preposterously counterproductive and wasteful. Where is some common sense? If you want to make some cuts at the building level, the instructional aide that provides P.E. Thit look at This is a non- Since certified person providing release time for teachers. teachers are already writing the lesson plans for P.E., the lesson than they they could much more readily teach the P.E. can perform the computer Let the lab attendant continue to do some of the release lab attendant functions. computer time as they have this year, also do some. and the music teachers will No further cuts should be made concerning the library clerks. programs They too provide invaluable services. Library are already diminished because of this year's requirement for librarians to provide release time, and librarians increasing are hampered in their efforts to meet the ever- library needs of students and teachers. as expanded by the new curriculum. clerks will further diminish the The hours cut from the services that the LHC can provide t o students and teachers. I'm sure addtiona] cuts Page 1in administration would be far less likely to impact on meeting the needs of students and teachers. Furthermore, why are you even considering adding new positions, assistant principals and social workers and others? be true that these are NEEDED and/or WANTED such as It may but budget matters should dictate that if you cant afford it, you cant have it. Therefore it follows, that you have to continue to do without and until you can afford it. These suggestions and comments are respectfully and sincerely submitted.  Page 2April 28, 1993 Dr. Mac Bernd, Superintendent Little Rock Public Schools Izard at Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Bernd\nThis letter is in reference to your memo soliciting ideas to make budget cuts for the 1993-94 school year.  I would like to suggest the following\nInvestigate whether or not the Abacus System can be disassembled and returned, at least in part. The only part of the system that is being used on a regular basis is in the secretary's office for keeping track of students enrolled, absences, etc. The part of the system that was purchased for teachers' use is complicated to use, does not save time and effort as was promised, and does not yet, after an entire year, have even a small percent of the test objectives in the system. objectives were loaded, totally a waste of time. With onlycone computer per school, even if the standing in line to use the computer is Why not hire one person, if the system , to generate the tests and send them to the buildings in school mail\"? must be used This is what the IRC used to do with the math I believe if you poll objective tests, and it worked just fine. the teachers, you will find that the majority feel that the district wasted a lot of tax-payer money on the Abacus System. A lot of revenue could be recovered by sending back the majority of the system. Secondly, if you must cut something from our schools, take PE teachers, rather than computer lab attendants. The computer lab attendants have special training and experience in using the computer labs to enhance student academic performance that it will take the teachers years to achieve. lab will be greatly diminished for years to come. The effectiveness of computer However, teaching PE, as done in the elementary schools, can readily be done by the classroom teachers. The teachers are responsible for writing the PE plans already anyway, so teaching the objectives they write would not be that much more difficult. Do not purchase the ten new computers for each school. We don't need them. All elementary schools have 30 computers in the labs and maximum class size is 27. be a waste of money. Purchasing ten new computers would Cut administration some more. There are still too many administrative positions. eliminated. Responsibilities could be combined and excess positionsFILED u n. onfRCT COURT EASTERI district ARKANSAS HU) -16 IMS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .. CARL R. BRENTS, CLERK EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Cy: OEP- CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS The Joshua MOTION FOR FURTHER RELIEF Intervenors respectfully move the Court for appropriate further relief. The desegregation plan contemplates that the school district will follow all state laws and regulations of the Department of Education and that the district would not waste its resources by employing persons for administrative positions requiring State Department certification who are uncertified. The Court's budgeting concerns also contemplate that the district will not continue to waste its resources. Employment of unqualified persons in major administrative positions has been roundly condemned in this case. The Court may recall that at one time the then business manager of the district, Vance Jones, acted as superintendent. He was not certified. The district faced the loss of accreditation by his presence. He was removed. The Court is faced with a similar situation in the case of the incumbent associate superintendent of the Little Rock Public Schools. Appropriate and further relief is necessary to protect the interests of the Joshua Intervenors. For cause, the JoshuaIntervenors respectfully show the Court as follows: 1. Arkansas Code Ann.  6-17-915 provides: [The ex officio financial secretary of each school district in the state shall file on or before October 1 of each year a list of all personnel, certified and noncertified, employed by the district for the current year setting forth the annual salary of each and such other information as the State Board of Education may prescribe.] 2. Arkansas Code Ann.  6-17-919 provides: [(a) All warrants issued in teachers' salaries are void unless: payment of 3. (1) The teacher has a valid teachers' certificate filed in the county supervisor's office\n(2) The teacher has been employed by a valid written contract\nand (3) Copies of such contract are on file in the office of the county treasurer and the county supervisor. (b) The county supervisor or the district superintendent of schools and his surety shall be liable for any warrants which he countersigns in payment of teachers' salaries unless and until there is a valid teachers' certificate and contract for the teacher on file in the county supervisor's office. (c) The county treasurer and his surety shall be liable teachers' for all warrants in payment of salaries which he pays unless and until there is a valid contract in file in his office.] Arkansas Code Ann.  6-17-920 provides: (a) It shall be the duty of the county supervisor, when the teachers' contracts are filed with him as required by  6-13-620 and 6-17-919, to examine such contracts. (b) If the county supervisor finds that any board of directors has entered into contracts with teachers which total less than the amount earmarked by  6-17-905, 6-17-907, and 6-17- 908 or with a teacher who has not recorded with him a valid teachers' shall immediately notify certificate, the board he of directors in writing to correct the contract 2or contracts to conform to the legal requirements. (c) If the board does not make contracts in accordance with  6-17-905, 6-17-907, 6-17 908, 6-17-910 - 6-17-913, 6-17-918, 6-17-919, and other legal requirements, the county supervisor shall notify the county treasurer that the contracts are invalid. (d) It shall then be the duty of the county treasurer to refuse payment of warrants issued upon the contracts, and he and his sureties shall be liable for failure to do so\n(e) Moreover, the county supervisor and his surety shall be liable for any warrants which he countersigns which are inconsistent with the provisions of this section. 4. The Joshua Intervenors have an interest in insuring that the rules of law and regulations of the State of Arkansas be followed with respect to (a) school certification of Little Rock School District administrative employees and (b) whether the Little Rock School District is violating any rule or law in paying or promising to pay any uncertified or uncertifiable person for performing administrative duties. The Joshua interests are. therefore. in seeing that the financial resources of the Little Rock School District are devoted to meeting the educational needs of black children and other similarly situated children in the manner provided by law. 5. On or about August 1, 1992, the Defendant Board of Education of the Little Rock School District employed Janet L. Bernard as Associate Superintendent of its schools at an annual salary of $65,000. In addition to that amount, she was to be paid on the benefit schedule provided for district administrative employees. She was also awarded a car allowance of $1,200 per year. 36. The Defendant School Districts employment of Bernard contemplated that she would promptly obtain appropriate certification from the State Department of Education. This is a necessary contemplation of the position of Associate Superintendent of Schools in that the position ultimately supervises virtually all certified positions within the Little Rock School District. 7. Through March 10, 1993, Defendant Bernard had taken no steps to obtain either provisional or permanent certification from the State Department of Education. Moreover, Defendant Bernd, through that date had taken no steps to require Defendant Bernard to meet the educational certification requirements of the State of Arkansas. 8. The State Department of Education requires that all teachers and school administrators possess appropriate educational certification as a condition of employment for the position of teacher or administrator of matters which have educational policy import. Defendant Bernard does has not applied for and thus does not possess appropriate certification. Moreover, she has neither obtained or sought to obtain provisional certification. 9. Defendant's Bernd and the Little Rock School District are aware of the deficiencies of Defendant Bernard, and of the requirements of law cited herein, yet these defendants continue to pay Defendant Bernard. Such pay continuation is in willful and deliberate violation of law and of school district policy. Furthermore, it is in violation of the budgeting requirements of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 4Arkansas. 10. On or about October 1, 1993, the School Defendants sought to comply with the provisions of A.C.A.  6-17-915 by filing a list of certified employees. They, however, knowingly and willfully omitted the name of Janet L. Bernard. 11. Defendant Bernd is either aware or should be that Bernard's failure to obtain certification requires that the State Department of Education cite the district as being in violation of state law and, further, to either place the district on probation or to have the district lose its accreditation. 12. Defendants Bernd and Bernard have sought to avoid loss of certification for the district by the lack of qualification described, supra, by simply being silent about it. 13. The Pulaski County Treasurer continues to honor Little Rock School District warrants for Defendant Bernard despite Bernard's obvious failure to meet the provisions of A.C.A.  6-17- 919(a)(1). 14. The educational interests and needs of the Joshua Intervenors and the class whom they represent are being diminished by the defendants' faiulre to adhere to law, thus, enabling an unqualified admininistrator to administer Little Rock Public Schools. Such lack of qualification is also a reason for the school district's failure to meet the United States District Court's budgeting expectations. 16. Defendant Bernd is \"liable for any warrants which he [has countersigned] in payment of \"Defendant Bernard's salary and 5benefits\" unless and until there is a valid contract for Defendant Bernard in Defendant Bernd's office. A.C.A.  6-17-919. 17. The Joshua Intervenors have no effective recourse other than this action for further relief and for restitution. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors pray that Defendant Bernd be personally required to repay the funds which he has allowed to be unlawfully paid to Defendant Bernard\nand that the Court further find that the school district has violated the desegregation plan by its mismanagement of funds and by its assignment of unqualified personnel, as a matter of law, to administer the school district. The Joshua Intervenors also pray that the defendants be enjoined from making arrangements to continue paying Defendant Bernard from a fund other than the salary fund while she is without appropriate certification. The Joshua Intervenors further pray that the Court determine that Defendant Bernard is not certifiable under Arkansas law for the position of secondary school administrator in that she does not have sixty (60) hours above the masters degree in school administration or a masters degree plus thirty (30) hours in school administration. John W. Walker Respectfully submitted, JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this day of March, 1993. Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 A John 'W. Walker c:Irsd.mot 7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 JUN 2 5 1993 June 24, 1993 Oiiice of Desegrsgation Momtcnng TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. M. (Mac) Bernd, Superintendent of SchoolsClJ SUBJECT: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS POSITION I reconunend that Ms. Jeanette Wagner be appointed Director of Communications effective July 1, 1993 on the Administrative Non- Certified Salary Schedule at 04-7, which is a salary of $40,080.00 for the 1992-93 school year.HALL HIGH SCHOOL 6700 \"H\" STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205 Victor Anderson, Principal (501) 671-6200 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mrs. Estelle Mathis, Superintendent vl^Victor Anderson, Principal Hall High School : Staffing of the Secondary Schools July 26, 1993 At your request I have been reviewing the master schedules of the secondary schools since July 7. The process has been to check the number of course requests for individual courses and to authorize the number of sections of those courses for the master schedules. Small courses (enrollment under fifteen) have been eliminated in most cases, unless the course was a graduation requirement, was a magnet area of concentration, or was the only option available to students. Each small class that was authorized was evaluated on its need for meeting the curricular needs of students. In a few cases a small class was authorized because the elimination of the course from the master schedule would not have resulted in any personnel savings through transfer of the individual in question. In those cases it was felt that it was more appropriate to allow the students needs to be served than to cancel the class and have the staff member do supervision or a duty assignment. After the sections were authorized, surplus individuals were identified and transferred to schools where vacancies had been created due to resignations or transfers. FoUowing the placement of surplused personnel, vacancies were filled through transfers and by hiring new personnel. These steps in the process were coordinated with the Director of Human Resources and the principals. The net changes in full time equivalents in each building were calculated. The data were provided to the Director of Financial Accounting and the Director of Human Resources. Position control forms for the addition of new positions, elimination of positions, transfers, and new employment have been submitted by the principals. After review and verification of need from position control documents, authorized position changes will be approved.1 : O o o \"S Cr: s r r , Maria Parker AssoaSuci. Oesegretaocn 'Student AseigninanI r 1 Jeanelle Wagner I CoTmunicalioro ] \"~l ToBeAnnxnced AssoixSuol. School Oparat Rudolph Howard Hearing OHcer BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Estelle Matihls interim Superintendent T i I Qrady Qadberry I labor Relatione I Little nek School District Org tional Structure JULY 1993 Q 4 Arma Hort Oaeagragallcr FadlMalor Debbie Milam Voltmtaar* In Puttie Schocia Martha Rodgai Soloro- a After tn ler-i School 0AR6'- rI Qedw Rather -Parent Recruitmen'. Coordln^or Caiherina 6l\u0026lt;T Parent Coadinclof { Alice Stovall Reading 1 E EAstseslao Ma^atil^h.b CurrtcUum I I To Bo Announced HumonRaaources 1 To Be Announced MatmRascuces and Sand Support I I ] *Fino Arts Carol Green VocalronoJ Marte Millhollon ControHar Gone Parttar J Leon Adama 3 (Maroaral CrorrittiDr Aset. Supt., Elem. leSwota r I J [Lony S. Aobertcon I Aeet. Sept., Elam. J 14S^oale I [To So. inouncad Asst. Supt.i Sao. 13 Sdioola I- La^UMaAda/ Principote Principaia D T bt Pilnclpab Teoctiara Toachon Teoohen Foreign LangLtago Donnie Glasgow Setenco Dianne Wood Malhematlcs r ineaiwlw j S^coto Repomibaily of Appfoprfaia Aaioclate Supeitaleodei.i 4r ' 1. u Linda Young New Fulurea AtWatIca Olholte Falaon Allematlvo Laamrng ^Inslrudtonal Technology Phyeical Educaiton ! i.0on Aoama ' Pedoral Prugrejna' I Gmria { Dr.PoRy.Kohlar Excedionel Chibran Doug Eoipn Focilitlos Sanrices CharSa Neal Procursment Bred Montgomery Transporlalion 4 Jo Evelyn Elston Drug Education Merlo A- McNenJ Social Studies 4___ |_Poonita Hudspeth Pai Price EaiV ChlUftood ] { Pauletto Martin Adult Education 1 Lucy Lyon I LIbwry Sarvlcoa \"'Sltt!' Development 4 Jodda BDyMn r^ood Ssrvicaa Bill Bamhouss securityyRtsk Monaaemant Dave KIngaalla WonneUonSenicei 11 i  07'20'93 16:07 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst @001 DATE: TO: FROM\nSENDER'S FEONS^\nSUET ECT: little rock school district 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 FAX (501} 324-2032 ^^3 f f. SPECLAL INSTRUCTIONS: s 1 J i. Number of Pages (include Speed Dial .__ cover page Fax Phone Numl^er J? 'C)/ I F-- 1 - 2 -1 . J rBoard Of Directors I Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I To Be AnmurKsd Special Asalstant to Supt Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Dr. Russ Mayo Aaaoc. Superlmendeni lor Oes^regaten sterling Ingram lodas for IrwtnKtlon to ths Deputy Suptrintendi nt Jeenette Wagner Communications 'Student Assignment ] lihtfarst CrMDlWon Lany S. Robeitsen 1 Asst Elem. i- Astt Supt Eleni. ISSehooto KSchoote Dr. Victor .Indwaor AcBng AasL Sup., See, IS Se hook Alice Stovall Reading Arma Hart Desegregation Facilitator DebP MSam Votunteere m PutslicSdiod Bedw Rather Parent Recrvnmani Coordinator { Parent Involvement Brad Montgomery Tranaportaiion Principals Teadie rs [ Principals Piincipais Teachers Teachers Inceraive Schools Linda Yourtg New Futures 'Athletics Othedo Faison AKemativs teaming Caiw ] *Rcsponsibi]ity of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Gene Parlter Lar^uage Arts/ Foreign Language Dennis Glasgow { To Be Announced Mathematics { Marie A. McNeal Social Studies E Or. Unda Watson Hearing Officer ] ] Catherine Gil Parent Invofvementl E 'Fine Alts 'Instiudional Technology 'Physical Educational Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price Early Childhood 4: I Donita Hudspeth I Staff Develojxnent Little Rock School District Organizational Structure December 2,1993 DRAFT #4 Mrk MIhollen Acting Uaieger for Support Services To Be Announced! Planning,'Research and Evaluation Carol Green Ananeial Services Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty.Kohler btc^ion^ Chimn Pauiefte Martin Adult Education Doug Eaton FadWes Services Jadde Bo0dn Food Services Charlie Neal Procurement [ 5 I Dave Kingsell Informson Senneas lla Busness Systems ][ I Student Systems ] Brady Gadberry Labor Relations To Be Announced Human Resources 4 Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services ] BiK Bamhouse Security/Risk ManaoementBoard Of Directors I Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I To Be AnnouiKsd Special Aufttam to Supt Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Dr. Rum Mayo Asaoc. Superlmandent for Oaaag regal Ion Steiling Ingram AaaocMa lor Instruction to the Deputy Suparintandari Jeenene Wagner Communicatlona Student Assignment Margam GremlUlon LanyS. Robaitaon 1 Aaat Sept. Elem. -t- AaaL SipL Etom. 16 SctMOls KScltoola Arma Hart Desegregation Facilitator DeOtow Milam Votunteers in Public SdTOOi Bectn Rather Parent Recrunmeni Coordinaior { Parent Invotvement Prindpais Taachers Principals Teachers lincertive Schoote 4:Brad Montgomery Transportation ] *Responsibility of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Little Rock School District Organizational Structure December 2,1993 DRAFT #4 Mark Mlhollan Acting ManagerforSupport Sanricas [To Be Announced! Planning, Research I and Evaluation I [ I Dave Kingsella IntonnaSon SarvKW I J Business Systems Studer* System 3 D(. Victor Andoraor Acting AscL SupL. Sk. 13 Schools Alice Stovall Reading { Fino Arts Carol Green VocaionBi Education Principais Linda Young New Futures Athlelics Othello Faison ARenMrve Learning Centar Gene Parker Lat^uage Arts/ Foreign Language Dennis Glasgow To Be Announced Mathematics {Marie A. McNeal Social Studies {Dr. UnPa Watson Hearing Officer Instructionai Technology Physical Educational do Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price Early Childhood ] Catherine Gl\u0026gt; IParenl lnvoivement| Oonita Hudspeth I Staff DevelapirTwnl Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Exceptional Chi\u0026amp;ron Exc Pauietle Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Ubrary Sendees Rnancaal Sorvicos Doug Eaton FadMies Services Jadde Boyldn Food Services Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Charlie Neal Procurement BII Bamhouse Seeunty/Risk Martaoement To Be Annourtced Human Resources e: !(! . * !|f TRANSACTION REPORT P.Ol JUL-20-93 TUE 16:56 I I\n' D' START SENDER RX TNE PAGES TYPE NOTE I X f iXXXXXXXX ' JUL-20 16:54 501 324 2032 j3\" VE OK X X X X X X X X  U^xt,fmUi-AIOXXXX*'* \"*   .XIXXOJKIX^Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 {501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: January 12, 1994 To: Hank Williams From: n Brown Subject: LRSD Communication Assistant Position 1 wrote you on December 3, 1993 regarding the status of the unfilled Communications Assistant position, but still have not received an answer to my letters inquiries. 1 will appreciate your early response to the questions 1 posed last month in my letter: By what date can the Court expect the Communication Assistants position to be filled? Also, will this position be part-time or will it be full-time? Thank you very much. LRSD SUPTS OFFICE 143 P01 JAN 19 94 17: 13 Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT January 19, 1994 Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ann: Dr. Mayo has been given my approval to fill the position of Communication Assistant. has concluded his interviews, It is my hope, that after he filled. the position will be I understand that he has narrowed his choices, and that filling this position is a priority. sincerely, Henry P. Williams Superintendent of Schools /bjf 810 West Maricham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 824-2000 Rscsn/en November 1, 1994 '5 1994 Oiiice 3i De. Katherine P. Mitchell, Ph.D. 1605 Welch Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72206  Dear Dr. Mitchell: I am writing asking that you work for and vote for the continuation of hiring registered nurses to provide health care to our school children. Many of our students receive no health care other than what is provided at their school site. Registered nurses are qualified to provide professional assessments, emergency care and referrals, health education. and the all important mental health care. are not qualified to act in such an independent role. Licensed practical nurses In my consultation with the Little Rock School District, I have become aware of countless cases where elementary, junior and senior high students as well as faculty members have not only received excellent health care and mental health/suicide prevention/intervention but are alive today as a result of the professional assessment, quick response and committment of the school nurses of the LRSD. district should be proud! They are certainly a group of xdiich the As our society becomes more complicated, so do the lives of our students and faculty and so do the health problems demanding professional nurses in our schools. Let's not sell our kids short. Please continue your support of our registered school nurses and giving our students the quality health care they deserve. Thank you very much. * Sincerely Mary Paal, M.S.N..,R.N. ,c. Certified Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse cc: Linda Poindexter Dr. Henry WilliamsCA c? cAocAHCAacAann CsHisCZsOQCCsflsWsCS|* gZ5qg^cflK\u0026gt;g c z e 10 n Cfl CA c 0 s \u0026lt; c r M ro CA t-3 S M t-t O O O Z Z S 5fl I -fl n 1-3 O P3 n h-i 30 cn \u0026gt;o0 z (Tl UI o\u0026gt; o o o o o (7 s o o CT\\ a\\ w o o5 CM \u0026gt;H n  W CA ou h3 H o X CA a O' UI o M Co o *4  O \u0026gt; W W W o Cfl CA o w PO wo O OOMO OMI-l-OOOh-W ooooooooo OOtUOHMMOO OOOOOOOOO Ok-iMOOOOOO O Cft 00 o O h- O o o o o OO'tUOOOOOO 'jmoooooo 'fl o CA A w  CA s CMA h3 H oK \\ cs 5S r o g Cm w fl a Cfl O 3S H5 w fl Z  t* tr I I co I g \u0026lt;\u0026gt; I n I z I I 5 \u0026gt; H _ c'fyl Z ?d n es se lU 8 w n sgf D s O *9  N CA CA fl CA h3 ITE-, r, ?^z, -Atiimwiww.-r(S^mssmS^.^wsasssj^^ APR 1 3 1995 Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Office Of DescyftQSiiOd ivicniioriiio April 13, 1995 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Building 201 East Markham, #510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: In John Walkers parting remarks in court Monday, he suggested that we were moving toward segregated staffs and were out of compliance with the racial balance of two of the districts departments\nthe student assignment office and information services. Since his allegations were not refuted in court, I want to offer the following information as evidence of how carefully we are balancing the administrative services of the district. STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE 1993-94 1994-95 POSITION B W TOTAL B W TOTAL Student Assignment Coordinator Information Management Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parent Recruiter 2 2 1 1 2 Student Assignment Assistant Secretary 4 1 5 3 2 5 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 4 6 10 5 5 10 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 824-2000 Ann Brown April 14, 1995 Page 2 INFORMATION SERVICES 1993-94 1994-95 POSITION B W TOTAL B W TOTAL Manager - Systems Development Manager - Computer Operations Computer Electronics Technician Computer Operator Programmer Analyst Systems Analyst Training Coordinator Secretary 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 6 6 12 7 5 12 If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Henry P. Williams Superintendent of Schools e 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET To: From: Subject: LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS July 28, 1993 72201 Mr. Sterling Ingram, Director - Planning, Research and Evaluation Mr. Mark Milhollen, Controller Mr. Brady Gadberry, Director - Human Resources Ms. Rita White, Administrative Assistant Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent 1993-94 LRSD Staffing Process On Wednesday, July 21, 1993, we met for the purpose of implementing a process to staff the elementary schools for the 1993-94 school As directed by the Board of Directors, year. our goal was to achieve staffing efficiency to the extent possible without sacrificing the District's ability to provide high quality desegregated educational programs. Accordingly, it was agreed that a collaborative effort on the part of the persons responsible for various components of the total process would have the greatest likelihood of success. We utilized the following data and information: 1. Actual pre-registration enrollment data for 1993-94 as of July 21, 1993, for LRSD elementary schools (area schools. magnet schools and incentive schools) . This information was contained in a computer run received from the student assignment office. 2 . 1993-94 building capacities indicating the number of classes at each grade level for 1992-93. This information projected the number of classes needed at each grade level for 1993-94 based on the assumption that all currently assigned students (except 92-93 sixth graders) would remain and advance. This information was, likewise, received from the student assignment office and compiled on individual memos from the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation to each building principal. A request was made that each principal correct or adjust the list before returning it to the Student Assignment Office.Ingram, Gadberry, Milhollen and White July 23, Page 2 1993 3. Human Resource's list of existing staffing, reguest for transfers and vacancies by school. This included: position control:alpha report as of June 21, (a) 1993, showing all positions and employees\n(b) position control site report as of June 8, 1993, showing positions and employee names by school\nand, (c) 1993 transfer requests as well as a booklet containing vacancies in the District by school. 4 . 1993-94 Payroll Budget as of May 5, 1993, listing number of kindergarten and grades 1-6 certified positions budgeted for each school. To fulfill our mandate to \"staff lean,\" building capacity forms on a school-by-school basis. we reviewed the 1993-94 We noted the number of classes needed at each grade level during the 1992-93 school year. We compared that with the number of classes requested at each grade level for the 1993-94 school year. After determining the number of students actually enrolled in the particular grade as of this staffing process, we attempted to determine whether the number of classes was reasonable available data. in light of all currently Keep in mind. in making such determinations, considerations such as applicable state standards (i.e.. important maximum class size by grade level) desegregation plan requirements (i.e., maximum individual classroom enrollments at Incentive Schools of 18 in four-year-old classes\n20 in kindergarten, 23 in grade 1-3\nand 25 in grades 1-6, etc.) and other applicable guiding principles, (i.e., use of cross-grade grouping where possible to do so within applicable class-size limitations, considered and observed. etc. ) had to be Those requests which appeared to be reasonable based on the available information were honored. out-of-line with either the available Those which appeared to be developments were adjusted accordingly. data ( However, or anticipated such was done with the understanding that adjustments and refinements would have to be made as more complete data can be made available. By using cross grade grouping in the area schools, we attempted to maximize staff efficiency by minimizing the numbers of instances where class size did not come close to the standard applicable to the particular grade level. There was not a need to make use of cross grade grouping at magnet schools as there are enough students registered and on the waiting lists to maximize utilization of staff. Further, we are currently investigating whether the same would be permissible for incentive schools.HI  \u0026gt;. o 3^ Mt^*\u0026gt;i**iI^Xk'\u0026gt;*\u0026amp;W\u0026gt;'. RECE!'\"\"'' OCT 2 1 1995 FILED u S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OCT 2 5 Office of Desegregation Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUM  -noMurir n FRK EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS^^ McCORMACK. CLER WESTERN DIVISION By:------------ clerk By: t I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 ! I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE WRIGHT KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS MOTION The Joshua Intervenors respectfully request the Court to set forth in detail the continuing obligations of the Little Rock School defendants under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation. The problem arises from the following set of circumstances and facts. At several of the hearings before the Court, the Joshua Intervenors have objected to certain staff and faculty assignment practices of the Little Rock School District which the Joshua Intervenors contend are racial in effect. Most recently. the Joshua Intervenors repeated their criticism of exclusion or absence of staff of African American descent in the early childhood programs (infants through third grade) at Rockefeller Incentive school and at the supervisory staff level of the Little School District desegregation office (where the entire staff of seven or eight persons is white). These criticisms were first intended and submitted as constructive areas for dialogue. Then, when no changes were instituted, they were presented as areas forI direct and rather prompt action. They were also submitted as items for further inquiry or study as the district seeks to implement the plan in good faith. The parties have met with Ms. Ann Brown, ODM Director, almost weekly since on or about July 17, 1995 in an effort to reduce the areas of their disagreement and to find ways to improve the implementation of the desegregation plan. During these meetings, the above stated problems have again arisen. The positions of the two primary litigant parties are as follows: (1) Joshua contends that faculty and staff desegregation. properly defined, includes inclusion and placement of staff of both races in such way as not to allow the appearance, inference or complaint that some jobs are being intended for one race or the other, or that schools programs, programs, activities or grade levels are so intended. It includes inclusion throughout the administrative corps so that African Americans participate in leadership positions in all areas, providing open evidence to the community of the operation of a racially nondiscriminatory school system. Joshua further contends that the \"root and branch\" requirement of law requires elimination of exclusion and segregation as \"vestiges\" of discrimination. (2) The school administration contends that it is not obliged to provide a racially diverse staff in the early childhood program, at least at Rockefeller, or in the seven or eight positions of authority within the school desegregation department of the district headed by Dr. Russ Mayo. For the administration, if the plan does not specifically state a thing.Rm it is not required. The parties therefore have a material disagreement, the resolution of which is essential if the desegregation plan is to be implemented in a meaningful manner. The Court's action is therefore respectfully sought. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully move the Court for an order which either defines or interprets the obligations of the Little Rock School District with respect to faculty and staff. In the alternative, depending upon the administration's reply to this motion, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully pray for an immediate evidentiary hearing on the subject at which time the school superintendent and school desegregation assistant superintendent would be called upon to explain their faculty and staff implementation procedures. If the Little Rock School District positions are correctly stated above, then the Joshua Intervenors pray that the Court adopt the ODM findings and order the Little Rock defendants to implement the remedies recommended by ODM. * Respectfully submitted. John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 By: 72206 uniMi CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing was forwarded U.S. mail postage prepaid to all counsel of record on this day of October, 1995. Jo: Walker ! RR\" * OCT 2 7 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OCT 2 5 1995 JAMES w. McCormack, clerk By:____________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION D=P CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE WRIGHT KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION REGARDING FACULTY AND STAFF ASSIGNMENT PRACTICES One need look no further than one of the precedesors of this litigation to find that it has been settled for thirty years that desegregating faculty and staff in all schools, programs and offices is an essential ingredient of the transition to a racially nondiscriminatory school system. In Clark v Board of Education of Little Rock School District. 369 F2d 661, 669 (Sth Cir. 1966), the Court wrote\nwe agree that faculty segregation encourages pupil segregation and is detrimental in achieving a constitutionally required non-racially operated school system. It is clear that the Board may not continue to operate a segregated teaching staff. Bradley v School Board of City of Richmond. 382 U.S. 103... (1965)\nSmith v Board of Education of Morrilton School District. 32 No. 32, 365, Fed 2d, 770 (Sth Cir. 1966)\nKemp v Beasley, supra. also clear that the time for delay is past. It is The desegregation of the teaching staff should have begun many years ago. At this point, the Board is going to have to take excelled and positive action to end discriminatory practices in staff assignment and recruitment.I See also Green v County School Board. 391 U.S. 430, 435 (1968) (including \"existing policy and practice with regard to faculty [and] staff...[as] among the most indicia of a segregated system\"). The Supreme Court again addressed the issue of faculty and staff desegregation in 1971 in Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1. The Court reiterated the above quoted language from Green (id. at 18), and approved generally the requirement of thoroughgoing desegregation throughout every component of the faculty. 1 The Supreme Court in Swann reiterated that district courts possess broad equitable authority in the remedial phase of a school desegregation case. Swann. 402 U.S. at 15. Therefore, courts directed that a particular adminstrative position be I filled by a black person in order to further the goal of evidencing the transition to a unitary school system. See Smith V St. Tawwanv Parrish School Board. 489 F2d 415 (5th Cir. 1971) (assistant principal)\nDavis v School District of City of Pontiac. 487 F2d 890 (6th cir. 1973) (assistant superintendent). In the light of the foregoing history, the amended plan for the Little Rock School District is replete with provisions supporting the relief sought by Joshua Intervenors in the 1 See also United States v Jefferson County Board of Education. 380 F2d 385, 394 (5th Cir. 1967) (en banc) (\"forbidding discrimination in the hiring, assignment and promotion \"of teachers and other professional staff members\" and requiring that the defendants... take steps to assign and reassign teachers and other professional staff members to eliminate the effects of the dual school system\".) (subsequent history omptted).accompanying motion regarding the inclusion of black faculty and staff in every facet of the school system. Among other things, it is clear that the Court has authority to direct the Little Rock defendants to desegregate the staff of the internal monitoring office forthwith  and that authority should be exercised. See Smith and Davis. supra. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR By: Certificate of Service 72206 I do hereby state that the for to all counsel of record on this mail. igoing memorandum was forward day of October, 1995 via U.S. n W. Walker 2 See \"Desegregation Plan, Little Rock School District (April 29, 1992), at 1, first paragraph\nE.\nlast paragraph\nat 2 last \"bullet\" on page\nat 3 last paragraph at 191 C.\nat 192 A. 3. Moreover, defendants evidence their awareness of the requirements which Joshua Intervenors find it necessary to reiterate by including in each quarterly monitoring report assignment figures by race for staff at each school and in their administrative corps. r\u0026gt;Cf CC. TO: FROM: 4* DATE: SUBJECT: Little Rock School District Ann Brown, Federal Monitor RECE OCT 2 7 1993 Office of Desegregaiion M. Brady Gadberry, Director of Human Resources October 26, 1993 Number of LRSD Employees n Enclosed you will find the information you requested from me in your October 18, 1993 memo. This information was gathered from the data in the Position Control System. useful. I hope that you find it /ra 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361w o \u0026lt; 0\u0026lt; Em 3 tJ z X EM U N X o u X Em O so so rs PM U I \u0026gt;4 CD X PO tn so U o4 w 2 u U Em Q PO (A Os X J m PM X \"x. O o X w gg gg w EM X X u 3 X n CD OS co m PM r* os EM O X H X O \u0026lt;4 8 X u w X M Em UI Cm g (A Q H X EM X W O b g (fl Q H EM X H U z o z (A H M s w 8 C. Jcrf^^ 3 J .'3 5\n.-.u 0\n3 ' JOaJ.^T ' ArtrA.MSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOV 6 1995 '-'AiVicS n By: fr, Ujf A f neo f^, OP CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ORDER On motion of the defendants Little Rock School District without objection of the Joshua Intervenors, and for good cause shown to the court, defendants' Motion for Extension of Time is granted. The time within which defendants must respond to the complaint is extended to and including November 13, 1995. , /ha- STATES DISTRICT JI UNITED STATES DI JUDGE DATE: rWIS DOCUME^'T ENTcHED ON DOCKET SHEET IN CaVFLlAMCEiViTH RULE53 ANiWR79{a) FRCP CN BY tT' 2 5 5 9IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership Filed U S 013' iCTCCURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS MAR 1 1 1996 JAMES By\n1996 -J' MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 3\\ Wl 'M cQQR\\MAICbK, MClIRrK V OEP CLERK PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Before the Court are a number of motions (listed in the order filed) which the Court now addresses: (1) motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD) to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan [doc.#2481]\n(2) motion of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for partial unitary status [doc.#2483]\n(3) motion of the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of Joshua [doc.#2506]\n(4) motion of PCSSD to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520]\n(5) motion of Joshua for the Court to set forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544]\n(6) motion of PCSSD for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#2546]\n(7) motion of LRSD for an Order dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD, and the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\") [doc.#2573]\n(8) motion of Joshua for reconsideration of the Court's Order of December 11, 1995, and for completion of the hearing [doc,#2594]\nand (9) motion of PCSSD regarding the replacement of portable buildings with permanent construction. dated October 25, 1995 [doc.#2612], I. The Court first addresses PCSSD's motion to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan [doc.#2481] and LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483]. The PCSSD states that it has substantially complied with plan pxQvisions regarding library media services, staff development and counseling services, while the LRSD states that it has substantially complied with LRSD plan provisions regarding Home Instructional Program for Preschool Youngsters (\"HIPPY\"), Rockefeller Early Childhood Program, Parkview Science Magnet Program, and Job Training Partnership Act/Summer Learning Program (\"JTPA\"). Both the PCSSD and the LRSD argue that the Court should withdraw supervision from these areas of the respective plans. The PCSSD's and LRSD's motions were both filed on August 23, 1995. On February 9, 1996, the parties entered into a Stipulation whereby it was agreed that the PCSSD, LRSD, and NLRSD should be released from court supervision and monitoring in certain discrete areas of the desegregation plans. The parties further stated that they are in the process of assessing what additional areas of the desegregation plans are ripe for release from Court supervision and monitoring and to identify what areas of the desegregation plans -2-remain deficient in terms of compliance. The additional hearings that were scheduled to address the motions to withdraw were cancelled at the parties' request as a result of the Stipulation. In light of the Stipulation and subsequent cancellation of the hearings, the Court finds that both the PCSSD's motion to withdraw [doc.#2481] and the LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483] have both been superseded by the Stipulation. Accordingly, these motions are denied as moot. II. On August 31, 1995, Joshua filed a motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506]. In its motion Joshua argues that (1) the LRSD had not discussed the proposed management services contract with the Joshua Intervenors, (2) the proposed management contract has potential adverse racial effect and impact, (3) the proposed management contract has not been let for bids and is not a part of the program. research and evaluation instrximent for the next five years. (4) the proposed management contract has potential adverse monetary effects upon financial resources of the district and has the potential for adversely affecting the ability of the school district to meet its a desegregation obligations, and (5) the proposed management contract was not negotiated at arms' length and was designed to provide special favor to some unknown person in the school district. -3-The Court held a hearing on Joshua's motion on Saturday, October 28, 1995, and again on Friday, December 8, 1995. At the hearing on December 8th, counsel for Joshua tendered into evidence a document entitled \"Settlement,\" which Joshua maintains constitutes a settlement offer by LRSD that was accepted by Joshua with respect to the ServiceMaster contract. Joshua claims that this constitutes an offer by LRSD to settle the matter with Joshua by having the Court enter an Order enjoining the LRSD from entering into the ServiceMaster agreement and terminating the district's liability pursuant to Paragraph 14.12 of the contract. The LRSD, however, contends that this document was not intended as an offer to settle, in that it is stamped II Draft tl and is not signed by any party or the attorney for any party. On December 11, 1995, this Court issued an Order in which it ruled as follows: This Court declines to rule on whether 'settlement' constitutes this a binding agreement on the district or on whether the board of directors delegated Mr. Malone the authority to enter into it with Joshua. The Court finds that even if Mr. Malone had the authority and even if it was an offer to settle which Joshua accepted, settlement. public This policy 'settlement' prohibits this type of purports to create a situation in which this Court, by agreement of Joshua and LRSD, would by court order declare the agreement to be non-binding on the part of LRSD and would relieve LRSD of any liability. Indeed, Paragraph 14.12 of the ServiceMaster contract provides an \"escape clause\" for LRSD should this Court terminate or ServiceMaster agreement. modify the It provides that LRSD shall have no obligation to appeal decisions affecting the contract. Therefore, it implies that LRSD will in good faith abide by the teras of the contract and will not contract with Joshua or anyone else to procure a court order allowing it to escape liability. It would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a -4-contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party. This Court finds that ServiceMaster and LRSD did not intend that this clause would permit Little Rock to escape liability without a ruling on the merits. Therefore, the Court holds that this purported settlement cannot be enforced against ServiceMaster. Order, at 5-6 [doc.#2586]. On December 22, 1995, Joshua filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order of December 11, 1995, and for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594]. Joshua states they have not completed their presentation in support of their initial motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract, and they argue the Court has not ruled on the substantive grounds which it has set forth in its motion. The Court has considered the matter and remains convinced that its interpretation of the contract was correct and that it would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party. See Order, at 6. Joshua cites Union Nat. Bank v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n, 860 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1988) , in support of its motion. The Court finds Joshua's reliance on Union Nat. Bank to be misplaced, however, as that case involved a termination clause between the parties to the contract, see id. 860 F.2d at 849, while the case at Bar involves a purported settlement between contracting party and a third a party allowing the contracting party to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the non-settling -5-party. Union Nat. Bank is thus distinguishable and provides no support for Joshua's motion for reconsideration. In any case, even if Joshua is correct that such a unilateral escape from contractual obligations would be permissible under Arkansas law, the parties in this case intended that the contract would be performed in good faith unless this Court issued an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability pursuant to f 14,12 of the contract. The Court has not and will not at this time issue such an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability under the contract. Accordingly, the Court denies that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for reconsideration of the Court's December 11, 1995, Order. With respect to that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for completion of the hearing, the Court finds that this aspect of the motion should be and hereby is denied as moot. The Court notes that the December Sth hearing was not completed because Joshua specifically requested that the matter be continued so that it could file an interlocutory appeal of the Court's Order. Tr. at 92, 97. Indeed, Joshua stated that such an appeal would \"resolve a lot of matters.\" Tr. at 90. It was only after Joshua concluded that the Order was not appealable that Joshua now asks that the hearing be completed. However, because the Court's docket is full. the Court is unable to schedule the matter for a hearing in the immediate future. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, and because the Court in any case denies Joshua's motion for reconsideration, the Court concludes that Joshua's motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following -6-bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506] should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. Joshua may refile the motion to the extent they wish to pursue the matter after reviewing today's order. Should Joshua refile the motion, the Court will schedule the matter for a hearing. III. On September 14, 1995, the PCSSD filed a motion to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520]. PCSSD seeks to clarify those parts of the plan and programs that are or were calculated to further desegregate the southeast sector schools within the PCSSD, i.e., the Talented and Gifted Program within the southeast sector. the Fine Arts Program at Landmark, the Specialty Program at Bates Elementary, and Harris Elementary. The Court has considered the motion and finds that it should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. Joshua has not filed a response to the motion even though they would appear to be significantly affected by the matters contained therein. In any case. the status of this motion is questionable given the subsequent motions of PCSSD regarding potential school closings and new construction that would affect the schools in the southeast sector and elsewhere. Should PCSSD refile this motion, Joshua is expected to file a timely response stating their position on the matter. -7-IV. The LRSD moves for an Order dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to the LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD as of January 18, 1991, except to the extent the Court retains jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the plans and to conduct proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement or the terms of the plans [doc.#2573]. The Court finds that the motion for an order of dismissal should be and hereby is denied. Let there be no mistake that, with the entry of the settlement agreement, the claims involved in this ongoing litigation were dismissed. at least as technical matter. The Court finds. however, that no useful purpose would be served by entering an order of dismissal at this time. The Court of Appeals has instructed this Court \"to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion. to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement, and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require. II Little Rock School a List. V. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (Sth Cir. 1990) . The LRSD has frequently exhibited indifference or outright recalcitrance towards its commitments and has been slow to implement many aspects of its agreements (although some improvements have been made) . Therefore, the Court finds that an order of dismissal should be deferred in order to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement. Even had the LRSD acted in good faith throughout the years. the logistics and -8-complexity of this case are such that this Court's monitoring function would be impaired by entering an order of dismissal at this time. V. On October 25, 1995, Joshua filed a motion asking the Court to set forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544]. Joshua objects to certain staff and faculty assignment practices of the LRSD and contends that the parties have a material disagreement. Joshua seeks an Order which either defines or interprets the obligations of the LRSD with respect to faculty and staff. The Court has considered Joshua's motion and finds that it should be and hereby is denied without prejudice. The obligations of the LRSD regarding faculty and staff are clearly set forth in both the LRSD Plan and the Interdistrict Plan and need not be repeated here. Moreover, the parties have agreed in their Stipulation that they are in the process of assessing what additional areas of the desegregation plans are ripe for release from Court supervision and monitoring and to identify what areas of the desegregation plans remain deficient in terms of compliance. Should the parties be unable to reach agreement regarding faculty and staff desegregation, Joshua may refile its motion. -9-VI. On October 26, 1995, PCSSD filed a motion for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#2546]. In its motion, PCSSD asks for permission to begin construction on one permanent classroom at Jacksonville Elementary, four permanent classrooms at Bayou Meto, seven permanent classrooms at Landmark Elementary, and three permanent classrooms at Pine Forest Elementary. On January 29, 1996, PCSSD filed a subsequent motion regarding the replacement of portable buildings with permanent construction dated October 25, 1995 [doc.#2612]. This latter motion supplements and essentially supersedes the previous motion filed on October 26, 1995. In its supplemental motion, PCSSD seeks permission to begin construction on two permanent classrooms at Cato Elementary, two classrooms at Arnold Drive Elementary, four permanent classrooms at Bayou Meto, seven permanent classrooms at Landmark Elementary, and three permanent classrooms at Pine Forest Elementary. The Court has carefully considered the matter and concludes that PCSSD's request is consistent with the district's long-range plans for replacement of portable buildings. The construction will not increase the capacity of the aforementioned schools, with the exception of Pine Forest Elementary.' Accordingly, the motions for an Order regarding portable buildings are hereby granted. 1 On September 15, 1995, the Court approved a motion granting the PCSSD permission to add a kindergarten class to improve racial balance at Pine Forest Elementary. The district has represented to the Court that one of the permanent classrooms would reflect the additional capacity resulting from the new kindergarten class. -10-VII. In sum, the Court denies as moot PCSSD's motion to withdraw [doc.#2481], denies as moot LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483], denies that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for reconsideration of the Court's December 11, 1995 Order [doc.#2594], denies as moot that portion of Joshua's motion which asks for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594], denies without prejudice Joshua's motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506], denies without prejudice PCSSD's motion to clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan [doc.#2520], denies LRSD's motion for an Order of dismissal [doc.#2573], denies without prejudice Joshua's motion for an Order setting forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation [doc.#2544], and grants PCSSD's motions for an Order regarding portable buildings [doc.#'s 2546 \u0026amp; 2612]. 'A IT IS SO ORDERED this ay of March 1996. mis DOCLi.Mt.NT ent: :d on docket sheet in COMPUANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON BY -11- C  C/= LRSD ADMIN. BULDING Fax:1-501-324-2032 Apr 26 96 8:41 F-. 02/02 LrrrLE Rock School District LRSD Administrator Accepts Fosiiion April 26. W96 For more information Suellen Vann, .524-202.0 Tire Little Rock School Districts budget director has announced his resignation. Fred Smith. Manager of Support Services, has accepted a position uith Laidlaw Transit In addition r bis financial .and budgetaD' responsibilities, Snuih also .d sen'ices, purchasing, transportation, facilities, and safety and security for tl, RSD. I welcome the opportunity to return to the private sector, and 1 look torward to ling to be involve. th the transportation of children of the Little Rock Sc!io(.\u0026gt;i Dnnict in my nosmon wi',!i i \"  said Mr. SmitL -Mr Smith has made improvements in our budget preparation and reporting 'du'es'. said Dr Henr/ Williar''- OSD nerintendent, and I wish him well in his \u0026gt;11. '.v's District Dire ir of Opeialions for Tennessee and  effective May 15 99ti. :tle Sock, .Lrkaii^ias 721101  (50.1)334 2000 . r I. 810 Wf.,\nV a.rlii.. Ill Street 03*-26- 98 21:47 301 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI -- ODM 002'008 Little Rock School District For Release\nafter 8:00 p m. March 26,1998 For more information: SueUen Vann, 324-2020 Superintendent Fills Administrative Posts The Little Rock School Dishict (LRSD) superintendent has appointed four top-level administrators. Tonight the LRSD Board of Education approved the appointments recommended by Dr. Les Camine. The four positions and appointees are\n Associate Superintendent for Administrative Sendees - Junious Babbs, Jr. Associate Superintendent for Instruction - Dr. Bonnie Lesley Associate Superintendent for Operations - Dr. Victor Anderson Director of Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation - Dr. Katherine Lease \"These appointments will help us as we work with principals and other staff to improve our schools,\" Dr. Camine said, Each of these individuals brings a great deal of experience and expertise to the position, and I look forward to working with each of them as we enhance the quality of education we provide our students.' Camine explained that these are replac nent positions, not new positions, although there may be some change in responsibilities if the new Revised Desegregation and Education Plan which has been submitted to the federal court is approved. Camine added that there might be some consolidation of responsibilities and reorganization of central administrative functions later this year. (more 810 Wssf Msrkhatn Street Little Rock, .Arkansas 7220 1  (501)324-2000 03-26 98 21'. 48 0501 324 2023 LRSD C05IMUNICATI 0D3I @003-006 LRSD Administrative Appointments Page 2 of 5 Babbs position as Associate Superintendent for Administrative Services includes responsibility for desegregation functions of the district as well as other areas which will be designated following the courts action on the Revised Plan, according to Camine. Babbs Cjirently serves as principal of Parkview Arts \u0026amp; Science Magnet fligh School, a position he has held since 1985. Prior to that, he served as a biology instructor at Central High (1973-79), administrative assistant at Hah High (1979-80), assistant principal at Central (1980-83), and principal at Pulaski Heights Junior High (1983-85). Babbs earned a Bachelor of Science from Henderson State University in 1973 and a Master of Science in Education Iron! Henderson State University in 1975. Lesley will serve as the districts leader of curriculum in her role as Associate Superintendent for Instruction. I am confident that Dr. Lesley will provide us strong leadership as we evaluate our curriculum and recommend strengthening our academic program, Carnine noted. Lesley serves as the .Associate Superintendent and Chief of Staff of the Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools. She previously held the position of Associate State Superintendent for Standards and Curriculum for the Delaware Department of Public Instruction\nAssistant Superintendent for Curriculum Support Services in the Austin, Texas Independent School District\nand Deputy Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction in the Waco, Texas Independent School District (more)03 26 99 21\n49 301 324 2023 LRSD COMMVNICATI ODM @004/006 LRSD Administrative .Appointments Page 3 of 5 Lesley earned e Bachelor of Arts in 1962 from the University of North Texas, the Master of Arts in 1968 from West Texas State University\nand the Doctor of Education degree in 1989 from Baylor University. In assuming the position of Associate Superintendent for Operations, Anderson will lead business and planning functions of the district Dr. Andersons background as Assistant Superintendent responsible for secondary schools and as a building principal will help us significantly as we plan for the next several years, Carnine said. .Anderson, who .has served as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools since 1995, joined the LRSD in 1970. He served as English instructor at Horace Mann High School (1970-71) and at Parkview High School (1971-74) and as Dean of Students at Dunbar Junior High (197-U77). Following a sabbatical to obtain his doctorate, .-Anderson served as assistant principal at Horace Mann Junior High (1978-80) and at Forest Heights Junior High (1980-83). He was principal at Forest Heights Junior High (1983-87) and at Horace Mann Arts \u0026amp; Science Magnet Junior High (1987-88). .Anderson served as .Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation from 1988 until 1990, when he became principal at Hall High School. .Anderson earned a Bachelor of Arts from Hendrix College in 1970\na Master of Science in English/Educaiion from th.e University of Central .Arkansas in 1974\nand a Doctor of Pliilosophy in Educational Administration frr- George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University in 1978.03 26 '98 21:49 oOl 324 2023 LRSD COMMVXICATI ODM @005-'006 LRSD .Administrative Appointments Page 4 of 5 As Director of the Department of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Lease will supenise the districts planning and assessment functions. Dr. Lease brings to our district a diverse background in secondary education and counseling which will help us as we review' our assessment tools and provide assistance to our teachers and curriculum specialists, Carnine said. Lease presently serves as Director of Secondary Education in the Fayetteville School District. Prior to that, she had sert'ed as an assistant principal, counselor and teacher in Hot Springs, and served as chairperson of the Guidance and Counseling Department of the Texarkana, .-Arkansas School District, Lease taught at Parkview High School from 1973 until 1975 and served as a counselor at Pulaski Heights Middle School in 1975. .Lease earned a Bachelor of Science in Education in 1971 and Master of Education in 1972 from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville. She received a Doctor of Education from the University' of Arkansas at Little Rock. Salaries have not been set for the positions, but Carnine said they would be within the advertised salary ranges. He anticipates the appointees will assume their new roles by this summer. Vacancies created by Babbs and Andersons appointments will be advertised immediately, and the superintendent will empanel selection committees to review and recommend candidates. .Additionally, the title of .Assistant Superintendent Sadie Mitchell has changed to Associate Superintendent for School Services. Mitchell oversees the district's elementary (more)' 03* 26. 98 21:30 501 324 2023 LRSD CCMMVXICATI ODM  006 006 LRSD Administrative Appointments Page 5 of 5 schools. Another Assistant Superintendent position, which also supervises elementary schools, will be advertised\nMargaret Gremillion who retired this year- formerly occupied the positioc.JIJ N - O 5 - ? WED o ? : o 1 F . 0 1 Southujcst Office Supplies j Semes * Conveaie: 4723 Bise Line Rond  L\ni  SefscaoQ R.C'Cic AR , 2209 (501)562-6621 FAX (501)562-2466 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: ^1 -4\u0026gt; TIME: z4/X FAX # CALIuED: TO: FROM: : 4 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET\nT IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING TRA2JSMI2SI0N, PLEASE CALL (501)562-6621 REMARKS: 7J 1.1 H - O 5 - ? WED Q ? : O 1 P . 13 D Witnessing the submission of the reorganization plan to the School Boatd last Thursday night was one of the most iiTesponsible actions of the superintendent that has been done lately. Not suipiisingly, he tried to persuade the Board to approve the plan without a great deal of discussion or explanation. Tliis plan is a major play by two, maybe tluee players. The players include Dr. Williams, Brady Gadbeny, and perhaps Linda Young. None of these people actually know what the staff of the curriculum depaitments have done or attempted to do in our schools. Dr. Williams seldom goes to the IRC to discuss issues dealing with rhe curriculum, or has .Brady Gadbeny made it Iris objective to find out what goes on in the schools. Is he even qualified? Does being principal of a junior liigh make him an expert in curriculum'? Does being a Labor Relations Director make him an expert'? I don't think so. Yer, he has placed himself as Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum. 1 wonder what he knows about the National or State Frameworks for Math, Science. Social Studies, 'English, or Reading. Wliat does he know about integrating the curriculum and making it applicable for our students today? Since his illness has often sidelined him for long periods of time, I wonder what he knows about these topics or what goes on in our schools. Linda Young has been made a Director. 'What exactly does her duties as a Director of New Futures include? The Special Assistant to the Superintendent will be placed under her jurisdiction to do what duties'? Tills seems to be a lofty title for someone who was laired as a liaison for a special gi'aiic program only nine years ago. Does planning a reception tor the superintendent and solicting funds for the party deserve being named a director' .Serving on committees and advising the superintendent seems to go a long way. Does working in four' junior high schools and organizing the teaming approach for these junior high schools deserve the title of a Director? Someone seems to think so. When does dedication to schools and qualification for the job count? How has she worked with the curriculum people in reorganinzing the schools? Communication with most of the supervisors has been very limited. Gene Parker has seemed to be the only supervisor who has worked with her. 'Where does he nt into the structure? Word has it that he may resign since he was not placed in a liigh position. Sour grapes??? He is allowed to \"do ids work at home\" since the stress of the District bothers him. Ooooo, nice perks for someone who seems so tempermental at times. How cooperative a player is he? Whose team is he playing for? He often doesnt show for meetings at the time set by the group and wants the time changed for his convenience. disjomtedness. This seemed to an area of It seems as if responsibilities for the curriculum, the central theme of our schools, is getting left out of the whole plan. No one from the upper level of the administration has made it their task to find out what is going on in the trenches. Margaret Gremillion, Sadie Mitchell, and Vic Anderson are in the schools almost everyday. Ask them how much the curriculum staff works in the schools\nask the principals who haved asked for assistance. A comment which was included in the narrative of the business case states that 'the efforts of the present structure of the curriculum is disjointed. It I wonder how any one would know that as a fact. How much commumcation has been done with all the instructional supervisors or the specialists who are in the schools on a daily basis? What discussion has /J IJ N - O 5 WED O 2 taken place with the principals who requested assistance or the teachers who have been helped? Sta,ft development has been orchestrared by the various curriculum departments. This inservice has been the best in the state. No other school district in this state has specialists who can deliver inservice like the teachers in our district are receiving. Other districts must rely on coop stalT or other paid consultants. Our needs as the larcest and most integrated District in the state are special. Did any of the upper level staff see, hear, or participate in this training? No, I dont tliink so. Tliis staff development was done with a dedicated staff that planned and conducted the inservice with the iiishest level of professionalism. Teachers were provided with instruction, supplies, and guidance. Where else in this State could this much preparation be done and instruction be delivered? Planning was done jointly and cooperatively. AU areas of the curriculum were involved. Dividing the instructional staff up will be detrimental to continued joint planning. Will the current assistant superintendents continue to oversee the everyday operation of their schools, as well meet with the curriculum teams assigned to tliein, plan curriculum inservice, and advise building level administrators? Nothing was explained in the plan as to how or who would supervise, advise, or oversee the teams other than just saying they would operate under an assistant superintendent. Would the curriculum department still remain intact or would these teams by split up and placed in different areas? How can, or will, joint planning take place' Who will be placed on these teams? What personnel will be cut or moved? Nothing has been explained. Does the \"appointed\" assistant superintendent in charge of curriculum know about the strategies that have been implemented in our schools? Not since Dennis Glasgow worked as \"acting\" assistant superintendent for curriculum has the instructional staff felt as if they were a part of the school district. Issues were discussed openly, decisions were made jointly, no secrets were discussed behind closed doors, and efforts were made to do the best tilings for the students and the school district. I guess Maybe this is why Dr. Williams removed Mr. Glasgow from this position. Integrity and honesty apparently count for nothing in the eyes of our superintendent. I guess qualifications aren't worth much either, since Mr. Glasgow has the credentials needed to fulfill the position of an assistant superintendent for curriculum. I hope the Board takes a long and hard look at the reorganizaiional structure that Dr. Williams is proposing. If his contract is bought out by the Board, his structure should not be put in place for someone else to reorganize. Confusion and a feeling of being unsettled would exist again in our District. Should the superintendent and/or Board have some discussion with the staff and other people who will be affected by this plan? This District has some 25,000 students that wiU be affected by this reorganization. Is this the best tiling for our District? It seems that cutting some of the top administration would address cutting the Special Assistant to the Superintendent and some of the Director level positions. Most of the instructional staff are teachers, working at the same .salary level of the teachers in the district. Moving the instructional staff as a curriculum team under an assistant superintendent does cut cost. Many people do not realize that most of the people S'..T u N -05 WED O ? O 3 at the IRC are not on admirostratton level contracts. These people work longer hours than most classroom teachers and are paid as a teacher, The Board asked the superintedent to make cuts^ as tar away from the students as possible, but making certain people directors and retaining special assistants does cut away from the students. Our students beneht from the specialists going into the classrooms because they set special programs, and their teacheis get on the job training in the latest techniques in teaching strategies. Check into the creditiais of the specialists in our District. Most of them are award winning teachers, on the state and national level, who have continued their special training to enrich their education and provide better service for our students and our District. It seems as if the superintendent must have somethin: to hide since he wanted this plan approved so quickly. What is his underlying message? Does he ___ ____ special\" people placed in \"special\" places before he leaves? Most of the Board doesn't seem surprised at this action. Is this another one of his actions which may prove deadly to our Distnct? Does he even care? How much has he cared about our District since he want some of liis came here? Lip service doesn't show concern. The fact that this will be discussed and possibly voted on at a luncheon meeting next Thursday frightens most teachers. This should be done at a regular session. He says he has done what he was .hired to do, get us out of coun. He hasnt done that. He is riding on the coat rails of the people m the trenches who have worked with our students for many years. Who has done the ultimate work in the schools? Surely he doesn't think he has. How most teachers. many days has he spent in the schools since he was hired compared to the number of days he has spent looking fc. another job? Making token visits to a school does not help one understand what is being done on a day to day basis. Let him teach in a junior high ciass for a week, see the new strategies used in an elementary classroom, or do a hands-on activitv in a iiieh school class. He needs to understand that it has taken many people and many years to get out of coun. Tills District needs a leader who cares about all facets of leaining, visits with the st^, takes a true interest in the community, is not afraid to listen and understand, not one who acts 30 arrogant and oblivious to the needs of the entire communi tv. .3 tor Verbiage doesn't become action unless the person is truly dedicated to making this school distria the best in the State. Our students and teachers deserve the best! had the best that someone has to offer! We all wish that weJOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY LITTIDROCKARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (SOI) 374-375S FAX (501)374-4187 lOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER /K KIMBERLY R. DICKSON [DELIVERED BY FAX 324-2146 \u0026amp; U.S. MAIL] December 12, 1996 E\u0026gt;r. Don Roberts Interim Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Dr. Roberts\nI do not know whether I will be able to work with you as contemplated as long as Victor Anderson, Gail Bradford and Brady Gadberry are in positions of policy and continue to manifest attitudes negative to blade students. This is a concern which I have expressed to you before and it is of serious proportion. For the moment I am going to keep an open mind, but I ask you to examine their practices from a historic perspective as well as on an ongoing basis within the context of our monitoring reports. My views are particularly important as far as Mr. Gadberry and Mr. Anderson are concerned because I believe that they will be eventual superintendent contenders. raised. I will be happy to visit with you and them as well to explore these concerns which I have Thank you for your attention to this matter. :rel \u0026gt;hn W. Walker JWW:lp cc: Ms. Ann Brown Mr. Chris Heller Mr. Brady Gadberry Mr. Victor Anderson Ms. Gail Bradford 30  d 00I0IZ2 01  a  d a3~,nBn  fl nhof upaa 06:11 9661/31/3: '\u0026gt;4 3HN W. WALKER ALPH WASHINGTON ARK BURNETTE USTIN PORTER, JR. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVED litC 1 5 1397 December 12, 1997 Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright United States District Judge OFHCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LR-C-82-866 LRSD V PCSSD Dear Judge Wright: Enclosed please find the job postings by the Little Rock School District for four positions: for Desegregation, Support Services and Instruction and Director of Planning, Research and Development. I am writing to request that you allow the Office of Desegregation Monitoring to review and study the impact of the salary structure set forth in the i.e. $70-90,000.00 plus car allowance and benefits with Associate Superintendents postings, i.c v-w --- i---_-------- position being open ended defined as negotiable. one There is We have previously had extensive budget hearings. budget that allows payment of $100,000.00 or more including benefits to any group of employees. I believe that allowing the District to make these changes without court approval will have a tendency to have an adverse impact upon the ability of the District to meet, not only its desegregation obligations, but its other obligations as well. The effect will be magnified because the concept of equal pay will mean that scores of administrators may be able to make legitimate claims for upward pay adjustments. This will include principals and other persons at the Director no level. Dr. Leslie Carnine, the new superintendent, may not be aware of the budget concerns of the Court or the history of pay to The Court is reminded that there administrators in the District. has been no showing of a dearth of qualified applicants for administrative positions and thus, that huge payment is required to attract necessary staff. The salaries are grossly out of line for this district in comparison to other districts in the State except the possibility of the Pulaski County Special School District where we have raised similar concerns regarding pay inflation for administrators, many of whom are unnecessary. Dr. Carnine's principal advisor appears to be Mr. BradyPage 2 - Letter to Juge Wright December 12, 1997 Gadberry who has expressed chagrin at being paid less money than Dr. Richard Hurley, the Personnel Director. You will recall that Dr. Henry Williams brought Dr. Hurley aboard and paid him far more than anybody else without adherence to the salary schedule in existence. That put him ahead of his supervisor, Mr. By allowing advertisement at these ranges of pay, a number of people like Mr. Gadberry will be able to make claims Gadberry. for pay adjustments. This, in turn, will generate, I believe. more contention from the teachers and the grossly unpaid services workers, most of whom are black. Because of the broad implications and the possible far reaching effect of the pay initiatives, I respectfully request that you allow ODM to review this matter and to make a prompt report to the Court before the February 1, 1998 deadline. remind the Court that such increases also will necessarily result May I in substantial budget adjustments for ODM staff, if the concept of comparability to administrative positions in the LRSD is carried forward and if the Court ends jurisdiction any time soon. For those monitors will be entitled to Associate Superintendent level pay as well. This is not a anti-Dr. Camine letter. I expect that the teachers organization will express grave reservations regarding the source of additional revenues having been told that the District is on the verge of being broke in the recent negotiations. Thank you for your attention to this request. incerely. i John W. Walker JWW:js cc: Dr. Mr. Ms. Leslie Camine Chris Heller Ann Brown i i PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST December 9, 1997 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1997-98 school year: POSITION: Associate Superintendent for Desegregation QUALICATIONS: 1. Minimum of a Masters Degree. 2. At least five (5) years experience in a management capacity. 3. Must possess or be able to obtain an Arkansas Administrators Certificate. 4. Successful experience as an administrator in a multi-cultural setting or urban setting. 5. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality and equity in student learning and school organization. 6. Demonstrates the conviction that all children can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. 7. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement in decision-making and communication. 8. Demonstrated knowledge of how to apply the concept of high expectations to school organizational patterns. 9. Extensive experience in organizing staff development programs with a focus on Effective Schools research. NOTE\nAPPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. REPORTS TO\nSuperintendent of Schools'J- JOB GOAL: To assist the Superintendent in the task of the implementation of all aspects of the desegregation plan so that organizational and learning equity are achieved in the Little Rock School District. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITrES\n1. Assists with the technical implementation of the Districts desegregation plan. 2. Assumes the responsibility of developmental planning in the areas of long-range student assignment policies, magnet school development, increasing student learning in incentive schools, program placement, and equal educational opportunity planning and proposal development. 3. Assumes the responsibility of monitoring and evaluating the Districts desegregation plan with the authority to make written requests for changes in the central office or building practices which give evidence of impending implementation as well as the spirit of the desegregation plan. 4. Assumes the responsibility for the coordination of central office departments in the implementation of various policies, procedures, and practices relating to school desegregation. 5. Maintains contact with State and federal officials so as to keep abreast of statutes, regulations, court decisions, and legal options which pertain to the desegregation of the schools. 6. Assists school principals to develop a site-based decision-making process based on the Eflfective School research. This decision-making process will place high emphasis on teacher participation. 7. Assists school principals and teachers to continually improve learning quality and equity through the application of research-based instructional supervisory techniques. 8. Attends the Board of Directors meetings and prepares such reports for the Board as the Superintendent may request. 9. Other duties as assigned by the Superintendent. SALARY AND TERMS: $70,000 - $90,000 - commensurate with experience, plus benefits package, a twelve (12) month position, plus car allowance.APPLICATION DEADLINE\nFebruary 1, 1998 - starting date negotiable NOTE\nAll interested applicants must include a letter detailing how/why they feel they should be considered for the position. EVALUATION: Performance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Boards policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: Dr. Richard E. Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Superintendent of Schools. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST  December 9, 1997 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1997-98 school year: POSITION: Associate Superintendent for Instruction QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Minimum of a Masters Degree. 2. At least five (5) years experience in a management capacity. 3. Must possess or be able to obtain an Arkansas Administrators Certificate. 4. Successful experience, in an urban setting, as a principal and/or administrator with instructional program implementation responsibilities. 5. Evidence of successful experience with parent and staff involvement in decision making. 6. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. NOTE: APPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. REPORTS TO: Superintendent of Schools SUPERVISES: Staff as may be designated by the Superintendent JOB GOAL: To assist the Superintendent in the task of providing leadership, support, and direction in the area of instruction by providing building principals with a vehicle to more effectively utilize the division of instruction to improve teaching and learning.To supervise, on a constant, ongoing basis, the translation of the Districts educational .. f! philosophy, goals, and objectives into active terms that directly benefit each individual student. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. Attends Board of Directors meetings, as necessary, and prepares such reports for the Board as the Superintendent may request. 2. Serves as the chief advisor to the Superintendent pertaining to instruction. 3. Monitors instruction K-12. 4. Works with Educational Programs staff and principals to determine educational priorities and goals for the District and schools. 5. Provides leadership and support to Assistant Superintendents for School Operations and to principals so that they can conduct effective building level needs assessments. 6. Assumes responsibility for conducting the personnel evaluation of personnel as may be assigned by the Superintendent. 7. Assumes responsibility for assisting the Assistant Superintendents for School Operations, Educational Programs staff and principals to encourage and involve community, staff and students, when appropriate, in decision making related to educational programs and instruction. 8. Other duties as assigned by the Superintendent. SALARY AND TERMS: $70,000 - $90,000 - commensurate with experience, plus benefits package, a twelve (12) month position, plus car allowance. APPLICATION DEADLINE\nFebruary 1, 1998 - starting date negotiable NOTE\nAll interested applicants must include a letter detailing how/why they feel they should be considered for the position. EVALUATION: Performance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Boards policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel.SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: Dr. Richard E, Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM .STR PET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST  1 5 December 9, 1997 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1997-98 school year\nPOSITION\nAssociate Superintendent for Support Services QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Minimum of a Masters Degree. 2. At least five (5) years experience in a management capacity. 3. Must possess or be able to obtain an Arkansas Administrators Certificate. 4. In-depth knowledge and experience with financial, budgeting, computer, and data processing systems and applications are essential. Evidence, through positive past accomplishments, is required to demonstrate the high level of analytical, problemsolving, and decision-making skills needed for this position. 5. A strong commitment to quality desegregated public education must be shown along with a foil understanding of the relationships required between student, parent, staff, and administration to be a highly motivated, successful school district. 6. Demonstrated ability to effectively communicate, both orally and in writing, is essential. NOTE: APPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. REPORTS TO: Superintendent of SchoolsJOB GOAL: Serves as Chief Financial Officer and Business Manager responsible for the implementation and coordination of all District financial services including budgeting, forecasting, and accounting. Provides leadership in developing, implementing, and monitoring support services and programs for the District in areas such as building construction, maintenance and operations, purchasing, accounting controls, warehousing, food services, safety and security, and risk management. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. 2. 3. 4. As Chief Financial Officer, administers all financial services for the District. Includes direction of all accounting, payroll, budgeting, forecasting, and tracking activities\ndisbursement, accountability and investment of funds\nverification of bank accounts\ndevelopment of issuance of financial reports. Manages the process whereby support services and programs needs are developed, modified, implemented, and monitored to achieve desired results, cost objectives, and District goals\nInvolves\n(A) maintaining all physical plant facilities, including the coordination of new construction, renovation, repair, and custodial services to insure that high standards of workmanship, cleanliness, and safety, are maintained in a cost-efficient manner\n(B) controlling the procurement of supplies and equipment required for operation of the District, initiation contracts and purchase orders, securing bids and quotations, insuring quality of vendors products, managing inventory levels and coordinating central warehouse operation\n(C) planning, policy formulation, and implementation of food service requirements to meet District, State, and Federal guidelines by managing financial transactions, administering lunch and breakfast programs, controlling food service equipment and coordinating the purchasing, storage distribution and accounting of food and related supplies at the various units\n(D) administering a self-insurance loss program to ensure a high level of cost efficiency while maintaining a low loss ratio\n(E) implementing and maintaining security and safety programs to provide a high standard of security and safety throughout the District. Serves as advisor to administrators in the resolution of grievances based on terms and conditions of existing collective bargaining agreements. Attends Board of Directors meetings, prepares reports and presentations to the Board as requested by the Superintendent.5. Serves as chief financial and support services advisory to Superintendent, and serves as liaison with all professional staff, students, and the community on matters relating to financial and support services. SALARY AND TERMS\n$70,000 - $90,000 - commensurate with experience, plus benefits package, a twelve (12) month position, plus car allowance. EVALUATION\nPerformance of this job will be evaluated annually in accordance with provisions of the Boards policy on Evaluation of Administrative Personnel. APPLICATION DEADLINE\nFebruary 1, 1998 - starting date negotiable NOTE\nAll interested applicants must include a letter detailing how/why they feel they should be considered for this position. SEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: Dr. Richard E. Hurley Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 NOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED The Little Rock School District is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Equity concerns may be addressed to the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, or disability in its educational programs, activities or employment practices.PLEASE POST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM. STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST December 9, 1997 The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1997-98 school year: POSITION: Director - Planning, Research and Evaluation QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Minimum of a Masters Degree. 2. At least five (5) years experience in a management capacity. 3. Must possess or be able to obtain an Arkansas Administrators Certificate. 4. Experience in research, testing, and program evaluation. 5. Evidence of successful experience in developing and implementing monitoring and evaluation of educational programs. 6. A commitment to parent and staff involvement in decision making. 7. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. 8. Ability to administer programs and supervise professional staff. NOTE: APPLICANTS MUST BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. REPORTS TO: Superintendent of Schools SUPERVISES: Planning and Evaluation Specialists and assigned clerical and secretarial support personnel assigned to the department.JOB GOAL\nTo assist the Superintendent in providing the Board of Directors with pertinent evaluation data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. To manage the process whereby the Board identifies, on a yearly basis, the programs and services which have priority for evaluation. 2. To supervise the development of an evaluation design for each of the programs and services which have received priority for monitoring and evaluation. 3. To supervise the implementation of planning and evaluation designs which have been approved by the school district. 4. To provide technical assistance in the compilation and statistical analysis of data that will enable the district to utilize such evaluation results in the development, improvement, and/or elimination of programs. 5. To assume responsibility for coordinating the process for selecting outside planners and evaluators when they are needed. 6. 7. 8. To supervise the design and implementation of a district-wide testing program. Serves on such patron and staff committees as the Superintendent may direct. Assumes the responsibility for developing such reports as necessary to keep patrons and staff better informed about programs and services, and to facilitate their participation in planning and decision making. 9. 10. Assumes the respo\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_755","title":"Staffing","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","School employees","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Staffing"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/755"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["206 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL received DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL NOV J 3 1995 INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Office Of Desegregation INTERVENORS Moniicnng RESPONSE TO ~JOSHUA MOTION... . REGARDING FACULTY AND STAFF DESEGREGATION For its response. the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. LRSD is in compliance with its desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation. Joshua seeks to impose upon LRSD requirements which are not found in the LRSD desegregation plan. Joshua is entitled only to enforce the terms of the LRSD plan. The court must reject Joshua's efforts to impose upon LRSD obligations which are not contained in its desegregation plan. In exchange for the \"commitments set forth in the Plans 2. and the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement, II Joshua agreed to release all claims against LRSD and to dismiss this litigation. The district court retains authority to monitor the implementation of the desegregation plan and the Settlement Agreement, but not to impose additional obligations on Iaihy\\LRSD-Fac. Reathe parties. The relief requested by Joshua goes well beyond the requirements of LRSD's desegregation plan and should be rejected by the court. 3. The LRSD has long been unitary with respect to its faculty and staff. Vestiges of discrimination have been eliminated to the extent practicable. Unless Joshua can prove that new constitutional violations have occurred concerning faculty and staff within LRSD, the court is without authority to impose additional remedies. WHEREFORE, for the reason set forth above and in the accompanying brief, Joshua's \"Motion\" concerning faculty and staff desegregation within LRSD should be denied. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Christopher Heller John C. Fendley By: Christopher Hellerf Bar No. 81083 kaihyUlSD-Fac.Rai 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Response to Joshua Motion Regarding Faculty and Staff Desegregation has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 13th day of November, 1995: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller liuhyXLKSO-Fac.Ra 3IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL RECEIViO DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL NOV 1 3 1995 INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Office of Desegregation Mom wring INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM BRIEF IN RESPORSg TO THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MOTION REGARDING FACULTY AND STAFF ASSIGN P PRACTICES I. Introduction. In their Motion, the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua) complain that the staff of the early childhood program at Rockefeller Elementary and of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") Student Assignment Office do not include a sufficient number of African- Americans. Apparently referring to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring's (\"ODM\") September 15, 1995 \"Status Report on Staffing, Joshua prays that this Court adopt \"the ODM findings\" H and \"implement the remedies recommended by ODM.\"' Joshua's Motion, p. 3. In effect, Joshua is asking this Court to require that every 1 LRSD does not intend to suggest that it opposes the recommendations set forth in ODM's September 15, 1995 monitoring report. LRSD's position is that although LRSD may choose to accept those recommendations. desegregation plan recommendations. and the recommendations are not part of its it cannot be ordered to accept the louhyM-RSD-Fac.Nllschool, grade level and administrative department within LRSD meet some unspecified racial quota. The LRSD Desegregation Plan contains no such requirement. To impose such a requirement on LRSD would constitute a modification it the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Because Joshua cannot establish changed circumstances justifying modification, Joshua's motion should be denied. See Crumpton v. Bridgeport Educ. Ass'n, 993 F.2d 1023, 1028 (2nd Cir. 1993). Likewise, there is no constitutional requirement that every grade level and administrative office of LRSD have some quota of African-Americans. See Quarles v. Oxford Municipal Separate School Dist^, 868 F.2d 750, 756 (5th Cir. 1989)(\"[S]tudents do not have a 'constitutional right to attend a school with a teaching staff of any particular racial composition. t II ), quoting Oliver v. Kalamazoo Bd. of Educ.. 706 F.2d 757, 762 (6th Cir. 1983). Because LRSD has fulfilled its constitutional obligations with regard to faculty and staff, this Court lacks the authority to order additional remedies in that area. See Pasadena City Bd. of Educ. v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 436-37 (1976). II. Background. In 1971 the district court in Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, 328 F.Supp. 1205, 1211 (E.D. Ark. 1971), held that LRSD had fulfilled its obligation to desegregate its faculty and staff. For more than two decades. LRSD has aggressively recruited qualified African-American teachers and administrators. As part of 1973 agreement in Clark which a k\u0026gt;lhy\\LRSD-F\u0026gt;c.NI3 2resulted in a seven year moratorium on litigation, the parties stipulated that: \"The Little Rock School District is an equal opportunity employer and its goal has been and continues to be, through normal attrition and consistent with the hiring of qualified individuals, to achieve total administrative and teaching staff ratio of one-third black personnel.\" Exhibit A, Stipulation filed July 6, 1973. In 1982, the district a court in Clark concluded, \"[T]he Little Rock School District has operated in compliance with court decrees for nine years as a completely unitary desegregated school system . fl Exhibit B, Memorandum and Order filed July 9, 1982, P- 16. The court specifically found that LRSD had complied with the court's orders regarding faculty and staff. See Exhibit B, p. 13. The district court in Clark rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the proportion of African-American faculty and staff should mirror the proportion of African-American students in LRSD stating, \"The Court concurs with Dr. Lacey's view that the available labor market more appropriately determines the racial composition of the faculty and staff than does the ratio of students. II Exhibit B, p. 13. According to Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\"), African-Americans constitute less than 10% of the relevant labor market. See Exhibit C. LRSD has had at least triple that percentage for more than 20 years. See Clark v. Bd. of Educ. of the Little Rock School Dist., 465 F. 2d 1044, 1048 (Sth Cir. 1972)(\"The record shows that the faculty of the Little Rock School District consists of 70 percent white and 30 percent black k*tfay\\LRSD-Fac.N 13 3teachers.\"). Currently, 35 Q. 'o of LRSD certified personnel are African-American. See Exhibit D. LRSD's superintendent is African-American, and three of seven board members, including the board's president, are African-American. LRSD's history of exceeding the legal requirements relating to faculty and staff explains why the LRSD Desegregation Plan contains no specific obligations in this area. with the exception of staffing at incentive schools. Moreover, LRSD's outstanding record with regard to faculty and staff is evidence of LRSD's good faith commitment to a constitutional course of action. See Freeman v. Pitts, 306 U.S. 467, 491-92 (1992). III. The LRSD Desegregation Plan. The LRSD Desegregation Plan provides: The superintendent and school board must examine the racial makeup of all categories of employees including the administrative, teaching and support staff so that future recruitment and placement of persons to fill positions will be done on an equitable basis. LRSD Desegregation Plan, p. 2. As ODM has recognized, \"The LRSD plan . . . makes only a philosophical commitment to 'equity' in staffing and reviewing staffing patterns.\" ODM Monitoring Report, September 15, 1995, p. 9. The LRSD Desegregation Plan does not define equity.^ For the purpose of interpretation and enforcement. consent decrees are to be construed as contracts. U.S. V. City of Fort ^See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 660 F.Supp. 637, 642 (E.D.Ark. 1987)(\"'Equity' is simply not a synonym for desegregation.\"). k\u0026gt;ihy\\LRSD-Fc.NI3 4Smith. 760 F.2d 231, 233-34 (Sth Cir. 1985). Accordingly, words used in the LRSD Desegregation Plan should be given their \"plain. ordinary meaning. II See Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Milburn. 269 Ark. 384, 386, 601 S.W.2d 841, 842 (1980). Webster's Dictionary defines \"equity\" as \"freedom from bias or favoritism.\" Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1986). Therefore, LRSD's obligation with regard to faculty and staff is to hire and assign faculty and staff in a nondiscriminatory manner. LRSD has complied in good faith with its obligation to hire and assign faculty and staff in a nondiscriminatory manner. does not allege that LRSD has discriminated with regard hiring and assignment of African-American faculty and Joshua to the staff. Rather, Joshua complains that LRSD has failed to take affirmative steps to ensure that the early childhood program at Rockefeller Elementary and the LRSD Student Assignment Office include an unspecified quota of African-Americans. Because the LRSD Desegregation Plan contains no such requirement, Joshua's motion must be denied. See Crumpton. 993 F.2d at 1028. IV. Remedial Authority of District Court. Joshua argues that this Court has \"equitable authority\" to grant them the relief they seek. This argument fails for two reasons. First, Joshua has agreed that the LRSD Desegregation Plan is their complete and final remedy for the past discrimination of Webster's Dictionary defines \"equitable It as II having or exhibiting equity : dealing fairly and equally with all concerned.\" Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1986). kBtfay\\LRSD-Fc.N13 5LRSD. The creation by this Court of new obligations beyond the plan would constitute a modification of the plan which would require proof of changed circumstances. See Crumpton, 993 F.2d at 1028. Second, because LRSD is unitary with regard to faculty and staff, this Court is divested of authority to order any additional remedies relating to this aspect of school operations. See Pasadena City Bd. of Educ. v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 436 (1976). Each of these reasons for denying Joshua's motion will be discussed in detail below. A. Modification of a Consent Decree. As a part of the September 1989 settlement of this case. Joshua agreed that the LRSD Desegregation Plan would be the complete and final remedy for all past acts of discrimination by LRSD. See Exhibit E, Release of All Claims Against the LRSD. Joshua agreed to the dismissal with prejudice of this case and all consolidated cases involving LRSD, with the exception that this Court retained jurisdiction \"to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans. II Exhibit E, Release. The Settlement Agreement further provides: \"Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the Districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans.\" Exhibit E, Settlement Agreement, p. 19. Like LRSD, Joshua is bound by the terms of the LRSD Desegregation Plan and the September 1989 settlement agreement, and this Court has no authority to expand the lathyVLRSD-Fac.NlS 6obligations of LRSD over its objections. See Crumpton. 993 F.2d at 1028\nsee also U.S. V. Overton, 834 F.2d 1171, 1173 (Sth Cir. 1987) . In Crumpton. SUpra, the defendants in school desegregation case filed a motion asking the district court to \"clarify\" a consent decree to make clear that the defendants were to give an absolute preference to minorities when laying off teachers. The district court granted the defendants motion and approved of the preference in favor of minority teachers. The teachers' association appealed contending that the preference constituted an impermissible modification of the consent decree. The first issue for the court of appeals was \"whether the clarification was in fact a modification.\" Crumpton. 993 F.2d at 1028. In resolving this issue, the court first recognized that: While a consent decree is a judicial pronouncement, it is principally an agreement between the parties and as such should be construed like a contract. contract, the scope of consent decree [LJike a \"must be discerned within its four corners. II United States v. Armour \u0026amp; Co.. 402 U.S. 673, 682, 91 S.Ct. 1752, 1757, 29 L.Ed.2d 256 (1971), and, hence, a court construing such a document is \"not entitled to expand or contract the agreement of the parties as set forth in the consent decree.\" 1985). Berger v. Heckler. 771 F.2d 1556, 1568 (2d Cir. a a Id. Applying these principles, the court of appeals found that the \"clarification\" was in reality a modification because the consent decree made no mention of layoffs. Id., at 1029. In remanding the case for determination as to whether modification was a permissible. the court noted that \"one party to a consent decree cannot unilaterally rewrite the agreement over another party's objections, in order to pursue a course of action favored by it ... katfay\\UtSD-Fftc.N13 7where the course of action IS not authorized by the consent decree.\" Id., at 1030. As in Crumpton, Joshua requests that this Court 'define[] or interpret[] II the LRSD Desegregation Plan to require that LRSD maintain an unspecified quota of African-Americans within every area of its faculty and staff. There is no requirement in the LRSD Desegregation Plan that every administrative department and every grade level have some quota of African-Americans, and nothing within the four corners of the plan can reasonably be interpreted to create such a requirement. Therefore, Joshua's request for an interpretation is in reality of request for a modification. In Rufo V. Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail. 502 U.S. 367 (1992), the Supreme Court set forth the standard for modification of consent decrees: [A] party seeking modification of a consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree. moving party meets this standard. the court If the should consider whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance. Id., at 393. Joshua does not allege changed circumstances which justify modification of the LRSD Desegregation Plan, and as a result, Joshua's motion must be denied. B. LRSD Is Unitary With Regard to Faculty and Staff. Once segregated by law, LRSD is obligated to eliminate the vestiges of discrimination to the extent practicable. Bd. of Educ. V. Dowell. 498 U.S. 237, 250 (1991). LRSD has met that obligation with regard to faculty and staff, and consequently, this Court kalhy\\LRSD-Fac.NI3 8lacks the authority to order additional remedies in that area. See Spangler. 427 U.S. at 436-37. 1. Eliminating the Vestiges of Discrimination. The requirement to eliminate the vestiges of discrimination with regard to faculty and staff is three-fold. First, a school district must assign faculty and staff so that the racial composition of the faculty and staff of each school is substantially the same as the racial composition of the faculty and staff in the district as a whole. Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School Dist., 419 F.2d 1211, 1218 (Sth Cir. 1970). In 1971 the district court in Clark, 328 F.Supp. at 1211, held that LRSD had fulfilled its obligation to desegregate its faculty and staff. Second, following the initial reassignment of faculty and staff, a school district must hire, fire and assign faculty and staff in a nondiscriminatory manner. See, e.g., United States v. Desoto Parish School Bd., 574 F.2d 804, 819 (Sth Cir. 1978). Since at least 1971, LRSD has hired, fired and assigned faculty and staff in a nondiscriminatory manner. This fact distinguishes the cases cited by Joshua in support of its Motion. The orders in Davis v. School Dist. of the City of Pontiac. 487 F.2d 890 (6th Cir. 1973), and Smith v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd., 448 F.2d 414 (5th Cir. 1971), requiring that a particular position be filled by an African-American were part of a comprehensive remedy which included desegregation of the faculty and staff. Because the faculty and staff of LRSD has been desegregated since 1971, these cases are inapposite to the case at hand. Compare Cunico v. Pueblo School Dist. No. 60, 917 F.2d 431, 437 (10th Cir. 1990). 4 louhyUJtSD-Fac.Nn 9There is no requirement that a school district maintain the racial composition of the faculty and staff of each school at the district wide ratio. The Fifth Circuit noted in Desoto Parish, SU pra, that \"Singleton does not require that such ratios be maintained permanently\nrather, it contemplates an initial reassignment so the racial ratio at every school reflects the systemwide ratio, followed by the utilization of nona discriminatory hiring, firing, and assignment policy thereafter.\" Desoto Parish School Bd. , 574 F.2d at 819. That no such requirement exists is demonstrated by recent cases granting school districts unitary status. See Coalition to Save Our Children v. State Bd. of Educ., ___ F.Supp. ___ ___ , slip opin. p. 49 (D.Del. 1995)(granting unitary status where \"[ajpproximately 80% of the schools in the 4 districts have fallen within a [plus or minus] 10% variance each year. With the exception of 1981, over 9 0% have fallen within a [plus or minus] 15% variance.\")\nStell v. Bd. of Educ.. 860 F.Supp. 1563, 1584 (S.D. Ga. 1994) (granting unitary status where 80% of schools in the district fell within a plus or minus 10% variance and 98% fell within a plus or minus 15% variance)\nand, Tasbv v. Woolerv, 869 F.Supp. 454, 470 (N.D.Tex. 1994)(granting unitary status where 97 of 191 schools fell outside a plus or minus 15% variance). Finally, a school district must make a sustained, good faith effort to recruit African-Americans so that the proportion of African-Americans on its faculty and staff approximates the proportion of African-Americans in the relevant labor market. See kBQQr\\LJ\u0026lt;SD-Fc.N13 10United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149, (1987)(relevant labor market)\nOliver. 706 F.2d at 763 (6th Cir. 1983)(\"The record indicates 'the type of sustained good faith effort to recruit minority faculty members so as to remedy the effects of any past discriminatory practices.' [citation omitted] This is all the remedy to which the Kalamazoo students were entitled.\"). See also Fort Bend Independent School Dist. v. City of Stafford, 651 F.2d 1133, 1140 (5th Cir. 1981). For over two decades, LRSD has aggressively recruited African-Americans for faculty and staff positions. These efforts have resulted in the proportion of African-American faculty and staff of LRSD far exceeding the relevant labor market. For the 1995-96 school year, 35% of LRSD's certified personnel are African-American compared with 10% in the 5 relevant labor market. See Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, F.Supp. , slip opin. P- 44 , (D. Colo. 1995)(granting unitary status where \"the District has achieved minority faculty percentages that far exceed those that exist in the available labor pool\"). Therefore, LRSD has desegregated its faculty and staff\nhired. fired and assigned faculty and staff in a nondiscriminatory manner for over 20 years\nand recruited and retained African-Americans faculty and staff members well in excess of their proportion of the The parties recently met and agreed that the relevant labor market is certified personnel in Arkansas. The racial composition of the certified personnel in Arkansas was provided by the ADE. Although invited to participate, counsel for Joshua did not to do so. kallv\\LRSD-F*c.NI3 11relevant labor market. In other words, LRSD has eliminated to the vestiges of discrimination with regard to faculty and staff to the extent practicable and is unitary with regard to this aspect of school operations. 2 . Equitable Authority of a District Court. Because LRSD is unitary with regard to faculty and staff, there is no constitutional violation for this Court to remedy and no basis for this Court's exercise of its II equitable authority. II A district court's equitable authority \"may be exercised only on the basis of a constitutional violation\" and the \"nature of the violation determines the scope of the remedy.\" Swann v. Charlotte- Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 16 (1971). Once constitutional violation has been remedied. a district court's equitable authority ends. See Spangler. 427 U.S. at 436-37\na Authur V. Nyguist, ___ F.Supp. ___ ___, 1995 Westlaw 646372, p. 1 (W.D.N.Y 1995)(\"In supervising a desegregation case. a district court's authority is limited: 'A remedy is justifiable only insofar as it advances the ultimate objective of alleviating the initial constitutional violation'\"). It is irrelevant that LRSD has not yet requested unitary status with regard to faculty and staff. See Hull v. Quitman County Bd. of Educ.. 1 F.3d 1450, 1454 (5th The LRSD Desegregation Plan is a six year plan. and the September 1989 settlement agreement releases LRSD from an further desegregation obligations at the end of those six years. Exhibit E. Thus, the September 1989 See settlement agreement contemplates that LRSD will be completely unitary after the six years of implementation of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Overton. 834 F.2d at 1173. See Ialliy\\LRS[\u0026gt;-Fc.N13 12cir. 1993) (district court may decline to order additional remedies where a school district is unitary despite the fact that school district has not requested unitary status). IV. Conclusion. Therefore, Joshua's Motion must be denied for two reasons. First, to grant Joshua's Motion would constitute a modification of the LRSD desegregation plan, and Joshua fails to allege changed circumstances which would make modification permissible. See Rufo, 502 U.S. at 393. Second, LRSD has fulfilled its constitutional obligation in desegregating its faculty and staff. and consequently, this Court lacks authority to order additional remedies with regard to that aspect of LRSD. Accordingly, LRSD prays that Joshua's Motion be denied. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Christopher Heller John C. Fendley, Jr. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 kalhyVLRSD-Fac.NB By: 13 Christopher Hei Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 13th day of November, 1995: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 kthyUJlSD-FK:.N13 c\n^istopher Heller\u0026lt; 14IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEJVED DELORES CLARK, et al.. Plaintiffs, Vs. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., ) ) ' Defendants. ) STIPULATION NOV I 3 1995 Office of Desegregafion Moriiicnng No. LR-64-C-155 3 DEFENDANTS f EXHIBIT f A Plaintiffs and defendants hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendants shall implement and administer for the 1973-74 school year and thereafter the student and faculty assignment procedures set forth in their Report about December 22, 1972 and in their Motions filed in this case on or about May 9, 1973. However, although the parties to this litigation believe that the ratio of black to white students in the district has now stabilized, if at the end of the 1974-75 school year, the overall proportion of black students then attending the primary schools in the western area of the city equals or exceeds two-thirds of the total student enrollment at such facilities, then the defendants will at that time re-evaluate the student assignment procedures and the grade structure presently in use for the purpose of formulating a procedure which would achieve the most equitable and efficient method of desegregation under the circumstances then existing. 2. Assignments of pupils to kindergarten facilities will be made on the basis of geographic attendance zones designed to assign such students to the facility which is generally closest to their residence. A kindergarten student may however elect to exercise a majority to minority transfer pursuant to which he or she may transfer from a facility in which his or her race is in the majority to a facility in which his or her race is a minority. A kindergarten student may also elect to attend a kindergarten facility located at a school where such student's brother or sister Is assigned to an elementary grade and insuch event, the kindergarten child will be eligible for transportation to the same extent as his or her brother or sister. 3. If permissible under applicable state and federal law, and if funding can be obtained, the defendants will, on an experimental basis. establish in 1973-74 a kindergarten program at selected eastern school facilities to serve four year old children residing in the vicinity of such kindergarten facilities. 4. The Little Rock School District is an equal opportunity employer and its goal has been and continues to be, through normal attrition and consistent with the hiring of qualified individuals, to achieve a total administrative and teaching staff ratio of one-third black personnel. 5. The defendants are opposed to, and do not employ, the concept of \"tracking\" of students. For purposes of this Stipulation, the term \"tracking\" refers to the labeling of students according to ability and on that basis permanently assigning them to a course of study to be followed throughout their secondary education. The defendants do however endorse and utilize the concept of \"achievement grouping\" in the elementary schools, and to a limited extent, in the secondary schools. Any achievement grouping in elementary schools will be carried out in the framework of presently existing heterogeneous student groupings. 6. The parties shall establish a bi-racial advisory committee composed of an equal number of black and white persons to aid the district' In resolving desegregation problems. The parties will determine the exact function, scope and composition of the committee at some date prior to the beginning of the 1973-74 school term. 7. For at least two years from June 28, 1973 or for as long as the defendants adhere to the commitments contained in this Stipulation, the plaintiffs and their counsel commit that they will Initiate no further legal proceedings concerning matters covered Page 2I by the terms of this Stipulation or the issues raised by the Report and Motions mentioned in Paragraph 1, and the objections to them heretofore made by plaintiffs, and further agree to assist the defendants in the defense of any litigation, initiated by others, which would tend to impair or hamper the successful operation of the desegregation program described herein. Plaintiffs and their counsel further commit to cooperate with the Board of Directors and administrative staff of the school district in promoting the successful operation of the district's educational program for the maximum educational advantage of all students in the district. Executed this day of June, 1973 by counsel of record for the parties, it being expressly understood that this Stipulation will be void and of no effect until ratified by the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. JOHN W. WALKER Attorney for Plaintiffs ''ROBERT V. LIGHTS Attorney for Defendants The foregoing Stipulation was ratified by a vote of the majority of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District in its regular meeting on June 28, 1973 . ATTESTlT^ - . ( 1,. Secretary President Page 3 received NOV 1 3 1995 FILED U.8i OISTRCT COURT eastern district ARKANSAS M 91982 Otiioe 01 Desegregation MOnilwin^N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS - - WESTERN DIVISION Ci Byu R. S, CLERK DEP. CLERK DELORES CLARK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS VS. NO. LR 64 C 155 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District has petitioned the Court for approval of a revised elementary school student assignment plan, the \"Partial K-6 Plan\".^ The plan is referred to as In 1973, after years of litigation. 2 the plaintiffs and the school district reached a mutually satisfactory agreement involving a number of issues, including a student assignment plan, and a moratorium was declared with respect to further litigation. Beginning in the school year 1973-74, the elementary schools were essentially desegregated. Because the eastern parts of the district are essentially black residential areas and western parts of the district are essentially white residential areas, it has been necessary to employ extensive bussing to achieve school desegregation. Over the years, there has been a steady trend of increasing black enrollment and decreasing white enrollment in the elementary schools. The trend is present, although less pronounced, in the upper grades. 1. DX 20. 2. The original desegregation case against the Little Rock School District was filed in 1956. was The pending case, which in 1964. simply a continuation of the original litigation, was filed j DEFENDANTS I EXHIBITThe following chart 3 illustrates the trend which has been established and maintained since 1971: Little Rock Public Schools, Grades 1-12 Change in Student Enrollment, Fall 1971 to Fall 1981 Year Number of Whites Number of Blacks Decline in Whites Percent Decli In Whites 1971 13,413 9,814 1,256 b. 1972 11,926 9,909 1,487 11.1% 1973 10,999 10,096 927 7.8% 1974 10,303 10,246 696 6.3% 1975 9,760 10,730 543 5.3% 1976 9,320 10,991 440 4.5% 1977 8,708 11,089 612 6.6% 1978 7,979 11,142 729 8.4% 1979 7,454 11,517 525 6.6% 1980 6,806 11,780 648 8.7% 1981 6,291 11,813 515 7^5%' The trend is generally explained by a number of demographic factors, such as population shifts by whites to the suburbs, increase in black population in the district, differences in birth rates, and, to some extent, the element of \"white 4 flight\". As previously mentioned, the increasing disparity in the ratio between black and white students attending the district is most pronounced at the elementary school level. 5 The following chart illustrates that trend. 3. DX 19, page 17. 4. DX 19, pages 12-28\ntestimony of Dr. Dewitt Davis. 3 . Composite from Exhibits 2 through 13. 2Little Rock Public Schools, Grades 1-6 Change in Student Enrollment, Fall 1971 to Fall 1981 Year Number of V/hites Number of Blacks Decline in Whites Percent Declir in Whites 1971 7,283 5,712 1972 6,497 5,933 786 10.8% 1973 5,700 5,822 797 12.3% 1974 5,012 5,805 688 12.1% 1975 4,560 5,864 452 9.1% 1976 4,374 5,928 186 4.1% 1977 4,066 6,022 308 7.1% 1978 3,871 6,218 195 4.8% 1979 3,459 6,637 412 10.7% 1980 3,152 6,661 307 8.9% 1981 2,501 6,953 651 20.8% During the 1977-78 school year. it became apparent that the student assignment plan implemented in earlier years was not accomplishing the desegregation goals established by the district. 7 The district took the initiative in correcting the problem. A \"Reorganization Committee\" was formed which studied various proposals and, as a product of that work. the district adopted a reorganization of the student assignment plan which was implemented in the 1978-79 school year. 6. The Court was given two sets of figures for student enrollment in the 1979-1980 school year. This chart is basea on the figures contained in Defendant's Exhibit 12. 7. Testimony of Dr. Leonard Thalmueller. 3Under the 1978-79 reorganization plan, the first three grades were designated primary grades and grades four through six were designated as intermediate grades. At that time blacks accounted for 63% of the students in grades one through six. One of the goals of reorganization was to maintain a black-white attendance ratio at each school which was within a ten percent variation from the district average at the elementary school level. 8 For example, as a result of the 1978-79 reorganization plan. Forest Park School had the lowest percentage of black students at 53% and Garland and Mitchell Schools had the highest percent at 70%. By 1980-81 the declining white enrollment, particularly in the primary grades, again resulted in significant deviations in the black-white ratio at a number of schools. For example. at Williams School, which is located in a predominently white residential area, only 8 white children enrolled in the first grade for the 1981-82 school year while 117 black children enrolled. There were seven schools, grades one through six, which had black enrollment of 80% or more. one in excess of 86%. Although the School District has been conscious of the trend of decreasing white enrollment and taken some measures to curtail the erosion. 9 nothing has significantly affected the trend. All of the persuasive evidence indicates the school district will have an enrollment which is essentially all black, particularly in the elementary grades, within the next few years. 8. Testimony of Dr. Thalmueller. 9. The administration has done an admirable job of offering quality education. Considerable effort has been directed toward providing curricula calculated to attract whites who have left the district's schools because of a oelief that the district was not offering quality education. These efforts include honors classes, ability grouping. emphasis on improvement in basic skills, etc. Addi- tionally, the administration has worked with the civic community and volunteer groups in efforts to encourage support for public schools and improvement in the quality of education provided. 4Faced with a significantly reduced white enrollment the primary grades and a vocal protest by white parents in against white racial insolation in some of the primary classes, the School Board adopted a \"65-35\" classroom assignment plan in the fall of 1981. The plan was a hurriedly conceivea stopgap measure to appease white parents of primary age children. The plan required that white children be assigned to home room classes with other whites until the percentage reached 35% in each class. The plan had the effect, of course, of creating some all black classes. The plan was disapproved by this Court following an evidentiary hearing in September, 1981. In the fall of 1981, the Little Rock School Board faced a host of problems which prompted reconsideration of the school attendance plan. For example, a significant disparity had developed in the black-white ratio of attendance at the various elementary schools and there was reason to believe the ratio would increase. Some of the black parents complained that their children were being bussed across the city to attend all black classes. Additionally, the last two milleage increase proposals had been defeated by the electorate and the district is faced with severe financial problems and an eroding financial base. The overall declining enrollment in the district and financial considerations dictated the closing of some school buildings. The Board took several steps in response to the problems. A \"Patrons Reorganization Committee^ was appointed to receive and review various proposals for pupil assignment plans and determine the feasibility of implementing the proposals. The Committee was asked to conduct public hearings 10. The committee was a twenty member committee composeu of 10 blacks and 10 whites, 10 who were males and 10 females. 5in various parts of the city in order to get as much input from the public as possible. The Board arranged for a study of the district's desegregation efforts by the Technical Assistance Center of Stephen F. Austin State University. This \"Desegregation Assistance Team\" submitted a report of its findings and conclusions to the Board in December, 1981. 11 The Biracial Committee, which is an advisory com- mittee formed as a result of the agreement in 1973, was asked to review the various plans and proposals for changes in the attendance plan. The administrative staff was assigned the task of compiling information and lending support assistance to committees. The Board also investigated the possibility of seeking an interdistrict remedy through legal proceedings against the adjacent County School District and has hired a law firm to pursue that remedy. Some 15 proposed plans or concepts for elementary pupil assignment were submitted to the Board, Patrons Committee and Biracial Committee for consideration. The plans were reduced to three, and finally \"Partial K-6 Plan\" was adopted by the Board after a number of minor modifications. The Board apparently views Partial K-6 as a temporary plan which provides the best chance for maintaining an integrated school system pending a decision in the interdistrict remedy suit. Partial K-6 Plan produces a number of results the Board views as preferable over the present plan. 1. The plan eliminates the primary-intermediate grouping, (or 3-3) plan (or has the same effect by pairing schools). Apparently one of the recurring complaints about the present plan is that students are moved from school to school too frequently. 11. DX 19. 6and their classmates change every three years. K-6 permits elementary age children to attend the same school or at least attend with the same schoolmates for six years, thereby fostering a sense of security, continuity and stability. 2. Partial K-6 permits the organization of nine neighborhood schools. 3. Approximately 1,000 fewer students will be bussed under Partial K-6. The number of bus routes will be reduced from 104 to 72 with an estimated immediate savings of $132,000. Furthermore, the number of school opening and closing times can be reduced. 4. Two elementary school buildings will be closed under partial K-6. 5. Partial K-6 employs the concept of a magnet school with a curricula attractive to some parents who are concerned about the quality of education. 6. The number of schools with a black ratio of 80% or more will be reduced from seven to four. Plaintiffs oppose the plan for several reasons. The \"objections to petition\" will be discussed in the order raised in plaintiffs' response to the Board's petition. 1. The \"plaintiffs object to additional black school closings\". This objection revolves around the part of Partial K-b which proposes that Booker Junior High School be changed to an elementary school. Although it is asserted that Booker will be \"closed\", such is not the case. 7Because of declining enrollments in junior high school, the Board concluded that one junior high facility was not needed. Booker had the fewest number of students ana reassignment of its students to other schools caused the least disruption. Thus, Booker was selected for conversion to an elementary school. Under the final plan, the schools which will be closed are Jefferson and King. Jefferson is in a white neighborhood and King is in a black neighborhood. The Board commissioned an evaluation of school physical plants and a report was submitted to the Board (the Leggett report) which indicatea that the cost of refurbishing and repairing King Elementary would be $1,500,000. On the basis of that estimate. King was selected for closing. Plaintiffs' argument that converting Booker to an ele- mentary school causes a \"burden\" on blacks is puzzling, is the claim that such a move is calculated \"to further as relieve white stufendts (sic) of educational presence in the Black community.\" First, if there is a burden on black junior high students, there is a corresponding buraen on white elementary students who will be transported to Booker. Second, the black neighborhood will certainly have the \"presence\" of those white elementary age students who attend Booker. Third, while black junior high students may be transported from the Booker neighborhood to other areas. black elementary age children will be relieved of that burden. It would seem that bussing older children is preferable to transporting elementary age children. With respect to the general allegations that school closings have, over the years, had the effect of relieving the \"propo-rtionate burden\" upon white children and enhancing it for black children, such is simply not supported by the evidence. First, all site selection for construction has 8been the subject of court approval. (Testimony of Lacey). Second, plaintiffs failed to produce any evidence tnat a school has been \"closed or downgraded\" because of improper consideration. Third, if there has been a \"disproportionate burden\" caused by transportation of students, it has fallen on white students, not black, and such will continue as the case under Partial K-6. (Testimony of Thalmueller and Lacey). The only bases for this objection are conclusory allegations which are not supported by persuasive evidence. 2. \"Plaintiffs object to the efforts to develop four 'segregated' or 'racially' identifiable\" schools. Under Partial K-6, four elementary schools will have a black enrollment of 90% or more. These schools are located in black residential areas. The black enrollment in the eighteen remaining elementary schools will range from 60% to 77%. Currently, the average black elementary enrollment in the district is 76%. Plaintiffs contend that creating four schools which have a black enrollment in excess of 90% is simply an effort to establish segregated schools and, that if allowed, \"there will be no prohibition upon the defendants in establishing them for white school children\". Plaintiffs further argue that by simply \"adjusting\" the attendance zones of the present plan a racial balance can be maintained in each school. The Board's decision to depart from the present plan was prompted by a number of factors. First, the present plan is not working. Although attendance zones can be drawn based upon school age census in the zone, predictions as to the number of students who actually enroll in school from that zone cannot be made with any degree of accuracy. Predictions as to enrollment by grade from a zone are even more troublesome. A good example of the problem is the 9situation last school year at Williams Elementary where b white children and 117 black children enrolled in the first grade. The problem of maintaining a racial balance at each school is compounded by the declining white enrollment at the elementary age level. In 1981-82, only 2,501 white elementary age students enrolled. This was a decline of 651 from the previous year. Obviously, if the trend continues. and there is no reason to believe otherwise, in a matter of two or three years there will be no \"critical mass\" of white students in any elementary school for the purpose of meaningful integration. Under the present plan, seven schools have a black enrollment of 80% or more. The Board's conclusion that \"meaningful integration\" did not exist at those schools is apparently supported by a majority of authorities on the subject of desegregation. Those authorities think that in order to have meaningful integration, 20% of the students must be of the second race. 12 Given the difficulties in predicting enrollment and the sharp decline each year in white enrollment, there is no reason to believe that a simple \"adjustment\" in attendance zones will reduce the number of schools with a black enrollment in excess of 80%. 3. Plaintiffs argue that Partial K-6 is \"reimposition\" of the concept of separate but equal. This argument would have some persuasiveness if there was any realistic hope of stabilizing the ratio of blacks and whites enrolled in elementary schools. Such stabilization plus a reasonable degree of predictability as to enrollment 12. DX 19, pages 7, 8. Testimony of Orfield, page 28. 10by grades from an attendance zone may permit the maintenance of a \"balanced ratio\" at each school. Unfortunately, such is not the case. Partial K-6 is simply recognition of the fact that a substantial number of black students are now being bussed across the district to attend classes which are essentially all black. Although maintaining a \"balanced ratio\" at each school IS a worthy goal of any desegregation plan, it is not the sole criterion. Most importantly, the four elementary schools in question are not part of a separate school system for blacks. Attendance is determined by neighborhood, not by race. Fur- thermore, under a modification to the plan, black students are given the opportunity of transferring from those four schools to other schools in the district. 4. Plaintiffs make a number of general objections to the plan which will be discussed collectively. Plaintiffs contend the plan violates a part of the moratorium agreement which required that the primary grades would be located in the black community when the black enrollment reached 65%. lished by the evidence. No such agreement has been estabFurthermore, if there was such an agreement, it has not been enforced because black enrollment in the primary grades has been in excess of 65% for several years. In any event, any informal agreement between the Parties reached in 1973 cannot reasonably be applied to dictate the terras of an attendance plan in 1982.- - so as During the evidentiary hearing plaintiffs contended that the facilities at the four essentially all black schools would be \"overcrowded\". Defendants' witnesses denied the 11allegation and contend that guidelines in the plan are calculated to insure quality education at the four schools. The Court is unwilling at this point to predict failure or the Board's stated goals of insuring quality education at the four schools. If any disparity develops in the facilities or the quality of education offered at the four schools, the plaintiffs can always file a motion seeking correction of the disparity. Plaintiffs contend the Partial K-6 plan is actually the same as the \"65-35\" plan offered by the Board and rejected by this Court in September, 1981. The argument is made that Partial K-6 effectively segregates by placing blacks in separate school buildings instead of separate classes, which was the effect of the 65-35 plan. There is little parallel between the two plans. The 65-35 plan was an ill-conceived reaction to vocal white parents who were alarmed about racial insolation in the primary grades. The partial K-6 plan is the product of a reorganization project which utilized the Patrons Committee, Biracial Committee and administrative staff in an effort to seek community involvement in a student attendance plan. Moreover, the factors influencing the adoption of the plan are legitimate considerations for any student assignment plan. The only weight which can be given the 65-35 plan in any evaluation of Partial K6 is on the issue of the Board's motive. The Court concludes that the Board is not motivatea by a desire to resegregate the schools in adopting.Partial K-6. Finally, plaintiffs contend that the district has not achieved unitary status in that \"vestiges of discrimination\" have not been totally eliminated. Particularly, plaintiffs claim that discrimination persists in the \"faculty, staff. programs, activities, discipline and site selection policies and practices of the district\". Since this same argument 12has come up at the last three hearings, the Court will address it although resolution is not essential'to the issue at hand. The claim is asserted that administrative and faculty positions are filled in a discriminatory manner. The issue regarding the recent employment of_a white superintenaent over plaintiffs' objections was decided following our evidentiary hearing in February, 1982, and need not be reviewed again. The question of faculty and administrative staffing has been monitored for years by Dr. J.J. Lacey, a black who is Special Assistant to the Superintendent for Desegregation in the district. Dr. Lacey knows and understands the require- ments of the Clark decrees and, without reviewing the details, the Court accepts Dr. Lacey's testimony that the district has been, and is, in compliance with those guidelines. Plaintiffs suggested, during the evidentiary hearings, that the black-white faculty and staff ratio should coincide with the ratio of black to white students. The Court concurs with Dr. Lacey's view that the available labor market more appropriately determines the racial composition of the faculty and staff than does the ratio of students. Plaintiffs claim all the \"heads of departments\" are white. This is not a fact but, in any event, the supervisor of all the academic department heads is Dr. Benjamin Williams, a black. The argument is made that currently there are no black principals of any of the three high schools, white principals and one position is vacant. There are two A black woman 1 J was recommended by Dr. Masem for the vacant position, but she was not hired by the Board. Plaintiffs also argue that 13. Dr. Paul Masem was Superintendent of the District for a little over three years and the Board voted to replai him. Dr. Masem's departure was not an amicable one am ce and he harbors some bitterness toward the District. 13Dr. Ruth Patterson was denied a position because of racial reasons and that racial considerations influencea personnel decisions involving William Thrasher and Paul Margrow. These arguments are supported solely by conclusions ana opinions of the witnesses. In any event, the opinions ana conclusions from such witnesses as Dr. Patterson, who can hardly be characterized as a disinterested witness, are not persuasive evidence that the district pursues discriminatory personnel practices. 14 Plaintiffs point to the fact that whites predominate in the honors courses, advanced academic courses and language courses as a \"vestige\" of discrimination. While it is true that whites predominate in those courses, there is absolutely no evidence that such enrollment is the product of any discriminatory policy or practice pursued by the Board. To the contrary, advanced academic courses and language courses are \"open\" to anybody who elects to take the courses. 15 There is no evidence that the honors program is administered in anything other than an objective fashion. According to br. Benjamin Williams, the administration has been conscious of the disproportionate numbers of whites in these programs as well as the fact that blacks are represented in disproportionate numbers in the basic courses. If there was any explanation grounded in racially discriminatory practices. surely those reasons would have been produced. Reference was made to disciplinary action and.the claim that blacks are disciplined in disproportionate numbers to 14. Dr. Patterson has a lawsuit pending against the district asserting her claims that she has been subjected to discriminatory treatment. 15. Testimony of Dr. Williams. 14whites. Dr. Lacey monitors the discipline situation and says that he makes \"every effort\" to see that discriminatory practices play no part in disciplinary procedures. Plaintiffs produced no evidence that any practice or policy regarding discipline was discriminatory or applied in a discriminatory manner. The suggestion has been made that one vestige of discrimination is the fact that whites are represented in disproportionate numbers on the cheerleader squads. A reference is also made to discrimination in \"extracurricular activities\". There is no evidence before the Court as to how cheerleaders are selected, the composition of the cheerleader squads or even a description of the policy or practice adopted by the district which is supposed to discriminate against black students. The Court has no idea what other extracurricular activities\" are involved in the allegation. Site selection for school closing and construction is alleged as a vestige of discrimination. That allegation has been discussed in preceding sections. Plaintiffs point to the fact that the Board has only one black member. 16 Plaintiffs claim the \"at large\" election procedure discriminates against blacks and that under Arkansas law the Board has the power to change the procedure so that members will be elected by wards. The Board's failure to ao so is asserted as further evidence of official discrimina- tion. Although plaintiffs' attorney assured the Court at trial that an Arkansas statute exists which confers that power upon the Board, he has been unable to furnisli the citation to the statute and the Court cannot find any sucn procedure in the Arkansas Code. In any event, the Board 16. T.E. Patterson, a black, had been a Board member for at least 10 years. In 1981, B.G. Williams, a black, ran against Patterson and defeated him. 15can hardly be criticized for failing to employ a proceaure which is nonexistent. Plaintiffs are critical of the Board for failing to take affirmative measures to halt the trend of increasing black enrollment in the district and stop the decreasing white enrollment. Specifically, plaintiffs' attorney re- peatedly asked witnesses if the Board had taken any steps to \"de-annex\" black residential areas from the district. Changes in district boundaries require, under Arkansas law, concurrence of the electorate in the affected districts. Arlc. Stat. 8 0-404, et seq. Unilateral action taken by the Little Rock School Board is ineffective. The surrounding Pulaski County District has publicly announced that it has no interest in merging with the Little Rock District. Aside from the legal impediments, it would seem that \"de-annexing\" black residential areas in order to deliberately get blacks out of the district is unprecedented and, undoubtedly constitutional. unIn summary, the Court finds no evidence of vestiges of discrimination in the district policies or practices. The Court adopts the opinion of Dr. Orfield and the Austin Study Group that the district has done an admirable job in the task of desegregation. Doubtless, there will always be allegations of racial discrimination when any school decision is reviewed in an adversary setting, particularly when there is an integrated enrollment of almost 18,000 pupils and 1,250 teachers and administrators operating under court order. Nevertheless, the Little Rock School District has operated in compliance with court decrees for nine years as a completely unitary desegregated school system and isolated complaints of discrimination without persuasive specific evidence to the contrary do not detract from that recora. 16Conclusions of Law The only serious question in this case is whether that portion of Partial K-6 which produces four elementary scaools with black enrollment in excess of 90% is unconstitutional. Although racial balance in each school is one method which may be used for dismantling dual school systems, there can be no serious claim that \"racial balance\" in the public schools is constitutionally mandated. Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 740-741 (1974)\nSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 22-25\nand Pasadena City Bd. of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424, 434. Furthermore, a small number of one-race, or virtually one-race, schools within a district is not in and of itself the mark of a system that still practices segregation by law. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education, supra at 26. This is particularly true where, as here. the one race schools are the product of demographics over which the Board has no control. Pasadena City Bd. of Education, supra at 436. As a tool for accomplishing desegregation of elementary grades, the present plan has, perhaps, outlived its usefulness. The dual system has long since been eliminated and the Board should be permitted to consider factors other than balance\" in structuring an elementary attendance pl \"racial an. Neighborhood schools, a magnet school, financial considerations, and the desirable are legitimate factors which the educational benefits of : aspects of a K through 6 grouping 1 may be considered when weighing one attendance plan against another. Given the declining value of the present plan for desegregation purposes, the Board is certainly entitlea to adopt an attendance plan which meets constitutional standards and permits the district to achieve other educational goals. 17Under the circumstances of this case, Partial K-6 Plan is a constitutionally sound plan which may be implemented by the Little Rock School District. Dated this day of July, 1982, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 13 16 17 18 18 20 21 22 23 24 26 28 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 39 36 37 33 39 DRAFT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATION DATA (AUGUST 17,199S) CEHTIRi ARTK-M i Jki wHrre BLACK STATE ION AREA UAI g 302 BUSINUa eOUCATIOM BNOUiH joumiAuui arcecM pmmcm ap ANISH HEALTH RHYSJCAL eOUCATlON COAOtlHS mOUSTRIAL ANTS MATHEMATICS VOCAL MUSIC K-1\u0026gt; INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC K-1E GUIDANCE ELEMCNTARV GUIDANCE SECONOARY SOCIAL STUDIES OAT TRACE K-aaMENTARY 1.4 SLEMENTARV SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY SPEa GIFTED AND TALENTED ADULT ED. RSADING MEDIA SPECIALIST HOME ECONOMICS GENERAL SCIENCE BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY PHYSICS PHYSICAL SCIENCE SPECIAL EOUCATlON SPEECH PATHOLOGIST ADMINISTRATOR ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL SECONDARY PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION AREAS (ABOVE) ALL CERTIFICATION AREAS 21 640 59 129 48 73 1091 2983 1227 292 1187 298 544 127 441 2802 960 63 1137 61 79 86 31 88 1 1388 1021 297 178 391 173 29 1132 586 1512 20938 33921 FEMALE MALE 840 1514 4030 176 433 347 444 668 1182 373 4 1673 315 481 962 938 2476 34 7241 14449 329 880 232 1080 1479 1195 1333 1108 238 81 283 1293 742 234 1137 307 50877 82782 12 42 0 10 8 2 95 256 74 47 134 31 58 8 43 194 26 7 ^77 2 12 a 3 0 144 94 29 3 61 20 3 83 79 167 1976 3142 FEM AL ?\u0026lt;r TOTAL 1117 231 330 3 SO 36 13 52 103 2 2 120 58 SO 114 111 248 __8 438 1825 18 50 62 89 118 150 143 120 37 5 71 161 42 29 180 88 5308 8608 2013 5082 243 M2 439 S34 1886 4529 1708 306 2888 1203 1113 1201 1538 6721 448 7748 17588 411 1023 371 1168 1888 1346 3011 2343 681 277 811 1647 816 1478 1992 2074 79200 123454 S DEFENDANTS EXHIBIT % BLACK 1iO% - 84% 34% 84% 10.0% 24% 7.8% 3.01i 16.1% 84% 7.4%' 8.7% 104%' 104% 7.7% 7.2% 5.7% 11.4K 5.1% 54% 194% 9.2% 7.2% 11.1% 9.7% 9.1% 10.1% 24% 164% 11.0% 54% 7.6%l 13.8% 123\u0026lt; 9.1 9.1 WOV I 3 Office of Desegregation Monitoringf 5 receive LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FACULTY \u0026amp; STAFF 1995-96 AZOV 1 J Office of ^esegregaticn Monii SCHOOL PERCENTAGE BLACK STUDENTS PERCENTAGE BLACK CERTIFIED POSITIONS VARIANCE PERCENTAGE BLACK SUPPORT POSITIONS nk^ VARIANCE Central High School Fair High School Hall High School McClellan Community High School Parkview High School Metropolitan Vocational High School Cloverdale Junior High School Dunbar Junior High School Forest Heights Junior High School Henderson Junior High School MabeIvale Junior High School Mann Junior High School f:\\home\\fl oa(w\\lrsd2.cha 63.62% 72.74% 67.57% 80.91% 51.65% Not Available 87.29% 60.56% 76.70% 78.21% 74.27% 53.81% 37.96% 41.43% 30.99% 29.87% 32.84% 21.74% 45.28% 51.92% 39.06% 50.70% 28.85% 40.00% \u0026lt; 6.23% 9.70% .74%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 1.86%\u0026gt; 1.11% \u0026lt; 9.99%\u0026gt; 6.45% 13.09% .23% 11.87% \u0026lt; 9.98%\u0026gt; 1.17% 73.81% 72.41% 66.67% 65.71% 59.26% 80.00% 88.89% 81.82% 52.00% 71.43% 52.38% 70.83% 5.02% 3.62% \u0026lt; 2.12%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 3.08%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 9.53%\u0026gt; 11.21% 18.18% 11.81% \u0026lt;18.01%\u0026gt; 1.42% \u0026lt;17.63%\u0026gt; . 82% 3 DEFENDANTS f EXHIBIT I .SCHOOL PERCENTAGE BLACK STUDENTS PERCENTAGE BLACK CERTIFIED POSITIONS VARIANCE PERCENTAGE BLACK SUPPORT POSITIONS VARIANCE Forest Park Elementary School Franklin Elementary School Fulbright Elementary School Garland Elementary School Geyer Springs Elementary Gibbs Elementary School Jefferson Elementary School M. L. King Elementary School Mabelvale Elementary McDermott Elementary School Meadowcliff Elementary School Mitchell Elementary School f:\\home\\lloaiw\\lrsd2.cha 47.71% 92.75% 48.85% 91.50% 74.17% 54.61% 43.08% 55.04% 68.71% 53.13% 76.18% 98.34% 31.03% 46.34% 27.78% 61.54% 45.83% 26.67% 19.44% 37.21% 27.27% 24.24% 18.52% 44.44% 3 \u0026lt; 3.83%\u0026gt; 11.48% \u0026lt; 7.08%\u0026gt; 27.00% 10.97% \u0026lt; 8.19%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;15.42%\u0026gt; 2.35% \u0026lt; 7.59%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;10.62%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;16.34%\u0026gt; 9.58% 64.29% 91.43% 69.57% 82.14% 64.71% 81.25% 81.82% 52.38% 68.75% 55.56% 88.89% \u0026lt; 7.31%\u0026gt; 19.83% \u0026lt; 2.03%\u0026gt; 10.54% \u0026lt; 6.89%\u0026gt; 9.65% \u0026lt; 4.93%\u0026gt; 10.22% \u0026lt;19.22%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 2.85%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;16.04%\u0026gt; 17.29%% SCHOOL PERCENTAGE BLACK STUDENTS PERCENTAGE BLACK CERTIFIED POSITIONS VARIANCE PERCENTAGE BLACK SUPPORT POSITIONS VARIANCE Pulaski Heights Junior High School Southwest Junior High School Badgett Elementary School Bale Elementary School Baseline Elementary School Booker Elementary School Brady Elementary School Carver Elementary School Chicot Elementary School Cloverdale Elementary School Dodd Elementary School Fair Park Elementary School f:\\hofnc'.f1oa(w\\lrsd2.cha 56.35% 80.87% 78.92% 70.85% 75.47% 53.19% 63.57% 51.52% 78.85% 85.16% 58.97% 'll .62^^ 21.88% 48.98% 42.11% 29.63% 44.00% 38.00% 25.00% 26.09% 33.33% 53.33% 32.00% 50.00% 2 \u0026lt;16.95%\u0026gt; 10.15% 7.25% \u0026lt; 5.23%\u0026gt; 9.40% 3.14% \u0026lt; 9.86%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 8.77%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 1.53%\u0026gt; 18.47% \u0026lt; 2.86%\u0026gt; 15.14% 73.68% Not Available 75.00% 68.42% 75.00% 93.75% 89.47% 62.50% 46.67% 73.33% 64.71% 71.43% 3.67% Not Available 3.40% \u0026lt; 3.18%\u0026gt; 3.40% 22.15% 17.87% \u0026lt; 9.10%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;24.93%\u0026gt; 1.73% \u0026lt; 6.89%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; .17%\u0026gt;SCHOOL PERCENTAGE BLACK STUDENTS PERCENTAGE BLACK CERTIFIED POSITIONS VARIANCE PERCENTAGE BLACK SUPPORT POSITIONS VARIANCE Otter Creek Elementary School Pulaski Heights Elementary School Rightsell Elementary School Rockefeller Elementary School Romine Elementary School Terry Elementary School Wakefield Elementary School Washington Elementary School Watson Elementary School Western Hills Elementary School Williams Elementary School Wilson Elementary School f:\\home\\floatw\\lrsd2.cha 41.95% 46.27% 95.54% 64.87% 71.76% 44.44% 85.41% 64.75% 80.00% 65.82% 51.10% 77.69% 20.83% 26.92% 56.00% 18.42% 39.29% 30.30% 58.62% 42.86% 26.67% 36.36% 27.03% 32.14% 4 \u0026lt;14.03%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 7.94%\u0026gt; 21.14% \u0026lt;16.44%\u0026gt; 4.43% \u0026lt; 4.56%\u0026gt; 23.76% 8.00% \u0026lt; 8.19%\u0026gt; 1.50% \u0026lt; 7.83%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 2.72%\u0026gt; 63.64% 84.62% 95.24% 82.35% 76.19% 57.89% 66.67% 86.11% 75.00% 46.67% 60.00% 68.42% \u0026lt; 7.96%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 3.02%\u0026gt; 23.64% 10.75% 4.59% \u0026lt;13.71%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 4.93%\u0026gt; 14.51% 3.40% \u0026lt;24.93%\u0026gt; \u0026lt;11.60%\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 3.18%\u0026gt;SCHOOL PERCENTAGE BLACK STUDENTS PERCENTAGE BLACK CERTIFIED POSITIONS VARIANCE PERCENTAGE BLACK SUPPORT POSITIONS VARIANCE Woodruff Elementary School Alternative Learning Center (Junior High) Total All High Schools Total All Junior High Schools Total All Elementary- Schools Total LRSD NOTES: (1) (2) (3) (4) f:\\home\\floatw\\lrsd2.cha 66.93% 41.67% 66.75% 69.55% 64.83% 66.28% 38.89% 55.56% 31.73% 38.83% 34.86% 35.16% 4.03% 16.73% 50.00% 80.00% 68.79% 70.01% 71.60% 70.91% \u0026lt;21.60%\u0026gt; 9.99% Percentage of black students will be based on Little Rock School District tenth day enrollment count 1995-96. Percentage of black certified positions and support positions will be based on Little Rock School District staffing/school personnel as of 10-13-95. Certified principal, positions classroom include teachers, principal, vocational assistant teachers, counselors, media specialists, resource/teacher, speech therapists, music, art, and P.E. Support positions include attendance clerk, cafeteria workers, custodians, media clerk, registrar, secretary, nurse, security instructional aides, and supervision aides. officer, 5RECEfVEO NOV I 3 J995 Office of Deseflregation l^onitcrin^ PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT March, 1989 (As Revised September 28, 1989) 2 defendants I exhibitPULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT March, 1989 (As Revised September 28, 1989)PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DESEGREGATION CASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. General Provisions 2 III. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Magnet Funding Calculation .............. Magnet Surplus Credit.................... Magnet Operational Charge................ Restrictions on Funding Magnet Schools . . Continuation of Existing Funding ........ Compensatory Education, Early Childhood Education and other Statewide Programs . . Conditions to Settlement ................ Act 34 Exemption ......................... Staff Development........................ Recognition of Autonomy.................. District Budgets ......................... Prohibition of Punitive Action .......... Rededicated Millages .................... Limit of Liability ....................... Majority to Minority Provisions.......... Consent Order............................. 2 2 3 4 4 6 6 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 12 State's Role in the Desegregation Process . . 13 A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. . L. M. Monitoring Compensatory Education........ Statement of Support for the Plans .... Petition for Election..................... Statutes and Regulations Affecting Desegregation............................. Elimination of the Pulaski County Education Service Cooperative....................... Commitment to Principles ................. Remediation of Disparities in Academic Achievement............................... Test Validation........................... In-Service Training....................... Recruitment of Minority Teachers ........ Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates ............................... Minority Recruitment for ADE Staff .... School Construction...................... 13 13 14 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 18 11IV. Dismissal of Litigation 18 A. B. C. Dismissal of the State with Prejudice and Release................................... Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua and the Districts......................... Reserved Issue ........................... 18 19 19 V. Attorneys Fees 20 VI. The LRSD Settlement 22 VII. A. B. Payment Schedule and Terms Loan Provisions.......... The PCSSD Settlement A. B. C. D. Financial Settlement 1. Magnet Payments . 2. Other Payments. . Staff Development. . Food Services. . . . Housing............ VIII. The NLRSD Settlement A. B. C. D. Magnet Payments....................... Compensatory Education Payments. . . . Additional Payments................... Description of Additional Compensatory Education Programs .................. IX, Execution ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Release of Claims Release of Claims State LRSD Release of Claims' - PCSSD Release of Claims NLRSD 111 22 24 27 27 28 28 29 30 30 30 30 31 31 36 36I. Introduction The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") Desegregation Plan (January 31, 1989) , the Pulaski County Special School District No. 1 (\"PCSSD\") Permanent Desegregation Plan (October 3, 1988, as supplemented February 15, 1989) , the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\") Desegregation Plan of March and October, 1986 (as amended or modified through February 15, 1989 or by operation of this settlement agreement) and the Interdistrict Desegregation P2an (February 15, 1989) (the \"Plans\") hold excellent promise for achieving unitary school systems in these three districts which are free from the vestiges of racial discrimination. Continued litigation regarding funding and other issues may make more difficult and further delay effective implementation of the constitutional obligations of the State of Arkansas and the three Pulaski County school districts (the \"Districts\"). This settlement of the issues concerning the Districts, the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\"), the Knight Intervenors (\"Knight\") and the State of Arkansas in Little Rock School District vs. Pulaski County Special School District, et al, No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (\"this Litigation\") is in the best interest of the students, patrons and staffs of the Districts and the people of the State. 1The superintendents of the Districts support the settlement and it has received the unanimous approval of their respective boards of directors. The business community as represented by the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce also supports the settlement and the Plans. That group has pledged the strong support of its membership to help the Districts achieve many of the goals of the Plans. The black plaintiff intervenors (\"Joshua\"), the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., the Little Rock and North Little Rock chapters of the NAACP and the Greater Little Rock Christian Ministerial Alliance pledge their support to the Plans and this settlement. The settlement is also supported by Knight (LRCTA, PACT, NLRCTA and the AEA) . The Arkansas State Board of Education, the Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") and the Governor of Arkansas support the settlement. 1-AII. General Provisions A. Magnet Funding Calculation Each Districts magnet students will be included in the calculation of that District's table rate in determining State aid to be paid under the MFPA formula or any future funding formula. B. Magnet Surplus Credit Any cash surplus remaining in the magnet school fund for given fiscal year after all expenses and receivables for that fiscal year have been accounted for (including payment to the host District for administrative costs) will be returned to the a a Districts and ADE as follows: (1) NLRSD will receive the difference between its table rate and $1,550 multiplied by its average daily membership in the magnet schools for the fiscal year to the extent surplus funds are available\n(2) If additional surplus funds exist following the payment to NLRSD, PCSSD will receive the difference between its table rate and $1,550 multiplied by its average daily membership in the magnet schools for the fiscal year, to the extent surplus funds are available\n(3) If additional surplus funds exist following the payments to NLRSD and PCSSD, 2LRSD will receive the difference between its table rate and $1,550 multiplied by its average daily membership in the magnet schools for the fiscal year, to the extent surplus funds are available. (4) If additional surplus funds remain following the payments to NLRSD, PCSSD and LRSD, the ADE will be refunded its magnet operation payments to the extent such funds are available. This provision will remain in effect for seven years beginning with the 1988-89 school year. The payment to the host District for administration of the magnet schools for the 1988-89 school year will be 3.09% of the magnet school fund. In future years. the payment to the host District for the administration of magnet schools will be the same percentage of the magnet fund as the state-determined percentage of the host District's budget attributable to administrative costs. C. Magnet Operational Charge The current per pupil operational charge for magnet students ($3,100) will remain in force until changed by the Magnet Review Committee, or in the event the Magnet Review Committee is restructured or eliminated, then by agreement of the parties, subject to the review of the district court in any event. 3The parties will review the operational charge on an annual basis but will not increase the charge solely for the purpose of creating a surplus. Calculations in paragraphs II.B., VII.A.1. and VIII.A assume a $3,100 operational charge. D. Restrictions on Funding Magnet Schools The State will have no further obligation to contribute any additional funds to magnet schools other than under paragraph II E. below. The Districts' obligation to contribute funds to magnet schools shall be limited to their paying their portion of the costs of the six existing magnet schools pursuant to the Court's order of February 27, 1987. Any reference to the six existing magnet schools in this settlement shall mean, for funding purposes, up to their present seating capacities. Those seating capacities are as follows: Carver 613 E. Williams Gibbs Booker Mann Parkview 515 351 660 935 991 Continuation of Existing Funding In addition to any payment described elsewhere in this agreement, the State will continue to pay the following costs: 4(1) The States portion of magnet school operational costs for the six existing magnet schools (Gibbs, Booker, Carver, Parkview, Mann and Williams) using the formula employed by the State during the 1987-88 school year modified by the inclusion of the number of students from each District attending magnet schools in the calculation of that (2) District's table rate for distribution of MFPA\nMajority to minority student transfer incentive payments to the host and home Districts as described in the August 26, 1986 M to M stipulation\n(3) The State's share of Magnet Review Committee expenses as currently allocated\n(4) Transportation to the six existing (5) magnet schools\nTransportation of majority to minority transfer students between the Districts as described in the August 26, 1986 M to M stipulation\nand (6) The State's share of any and all programs for which the Districts now receive State funding. 5The funds paid by the State under this agreement are not intended to supplant any existing or future funding which is ordinarily the responsibility of the State of Arkansas. F. Compensatory Education, Early Childhood Education and other Statewide Programs The settlement payments described in this agreement are exclusive of any funds for compensatory education, early childhood development or other programs that may otherwise be due LRSD (or any successor district or districts to which students residing in territory now within LRSD may be assigned or for the benefit of such students if the State or any other entity becomes responsible for their education), PCSSD or NLRSD under present and future school assistance programs established or administered by the State. The State will not exclude the Districts from any compensatory education, early childhood development. or other funding programs or discriminate against them in the development of such programs or distribution of funds under any funding programs. G. Conditions to Settlement This settlement is conditioned upon approval by the Districts' boards of directors (already done) and the State Board of Education (already done), the certification of the classes and class representatives by the court (already done), the 6execution of the releases attached hereto as Attachments A, B, C and D, the dismissal of the State from this Litigation with prejudice consistent with the terms of Attachment A, the approval of the terms of the settlement by the court and the enactment of legislation prior to August 15, 1989 either (1) making provision for the funding of the Settlement or (2) authorizing the Arkansas State Board of Education (State Board) to enter into a consent order which directs the State Board to make the payments which would fund the obligations of the State under the Settlement (already done). As used in this agreement, \"final approval\" means after all these conditions have been satisfied. If final approval of this settlement agreement is not obtained. no statement in the agreement may be used for or against any party as an admission of liability or intent. H. Act 34 Exemption No sums received by the Districts pursuant to this settlement shall be regarded as included within the definitions of total local resources, net local resources, gross current revenue. or miscellaneous funds pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. Section 6-20-301, et seq. or pursuant to any amendments to those sections which may hereinafter be enacted. 7All funds received by the Districts pursuant to this agreement, including any interest or earnings thereon, will be exempt from Sections 8 and 11 of Act 34 of 1983 (A.C.A. Sections 6-20-307 and 6-20-319) as amended or as may be amended, with the following exceptions: (1) For the 1989-90 and later school years, all MFPA funds received by the Districts, as calculated in accordance with A.C.A. 6-20-302 (1987 Supp.), including the portion of that calculation represented by the Districts' magnet students, will not be exempt\nand (2) the funds received by the Districts for any compensatory education. early childhood education. and other statewide programs contemplated by paragraph II.F. will be exempt only if the funds are exempt in all other districts in the State, and if so, those funds which are exempt cannot be counted by the Districts as expenditures satisfying Act requirement that 70% of net 34' s current revenue be used to pay certified personnel. I. Staff Development To facilitate the Plans, the ADE authorizes each District up to four \"release days\" per year for the 1989-90 and 1990-91 school years. Those would be divided as two release days per semester. Further, two such release days. one per semester. shall be provided for the 1991-92 school year. 8These \"release days\" will have the effect of shortening by four days in each of the first two years and two days in the last year, the student contact/instructional days contained within the Districts' school calendars. The parties recognize that any detriment which might result from the reduction of contact days will be outweighed by the benefits derived from the staff development training (which will include all appropriate desegregation training and specialized training in strategies designed to reduce the level of achievement disparity between black and white students) and the increased efficiency and competence of the trained teachers. It is further understood and agreed that these release days shall be in addition to any staff development days currently required or which might be required in the future by ADE or other State authority. J. Recognition of Autonomy The State, Joshua and LRSD recognize that PCSSD and NLRSD are independent, sovereign desegregating school districts operating pursuant to court orders and agreements and that this agreement is both necessary and desirable to facilitate their desegregation activities as well as their cooperative desegregation activities with the LRSD and others. 9K. District Budgets The Districts may utilize the receipt of funds paid pursuant to this settlement to balance previous years budgets and if this is done. neither the previous years deficit nor such fund usage will be regarded as a violation of State law. L. Prohibition of Punitive Action The State shall take no action (including the enactment of legislation) for the purpose of retaliating against the Districts (including retaliatory failure to increase State aid and retaliatory reduction in State aid) because of this Litigation or this settlement. The State will enact no legislation which has a substantial adverse impact on the ability of the Districts to desegregate. Fair and rational adjustments to the funding formula which have general applicability but which reduce the proportion of State aid to any of the Districts shall not be considered to have an adverse impact on the desegregation of the Districts. M. Rededicated Millages The court ordered on December 29, 1986 (reinstated Jan. 7, 1987) the rededication of certain millages of the Districts. It was the intent of the Districts and the court that all millages due to expire before the year 2007 be rededicated. The motion seeking the extension, however, failed to list 10all of the millages and consequently not all of the millages sought to be rededicated have actually been rededicated. The parties agree that the courts order of December 29, 1986 (reinstated January 7, 1987) should be corrected to include all millages of the Districts which would otherwise expire before or during the year 2007. Pursuant to this settlement, a corrected order has been submitted to the court for approval following final approval of the settlement. Upon approval, the order will be delivered to the responsible county officials. N. Limit of Liability The State's financial liability under this Settlement beyond that set forth in II.E. and II.F. shall be limited to $129,750,000 to be paid as set forth in Sections V, VI, VII and VIII herein. 0. Majority to Minority Provisions (1) In any application for aid pursuant to Section 6 of Act 24 of the 1989 Regular Session of the Arlcansas General Assembly, the receiving district for M to M students may include in such application any M to M students it hosts who are eligible for participation pursuant to Section 6(A) of said Act. (2) The State will continue to ma)ce payments under the August 26, 1986 M to M stipulation so that the host district receives its average cost of 11educating a student for each M to M transfer student enrolled in the host district. (3) When at least one Interdistrict School is operating in LRSD and in PCSSD, all M to M payments generated by Interdistrict School students paid by the State to LRSD and PCSSD (including payments to each district as sending district and receiving district), except transportation payments, will be pooled for the education of all Interdistrict School students. The instructional budgets of the Interdistrict Schools will be equalized. This provision does not change each districts obligation to construct and maintain the Interdistrict Schools within its boundaries. The State payments for M to M students not enrolled in Interdistrict Schools will continue in accordance with paragraph (2) above. (4) Beginning the first year an Interdistrict School is operating in LRSD and PCSSD, PCSSD will contribute $200,000 per year for five years to the pool of funds to be used by both districts to operate Interdistrict Schools. P. Consent Order The parties consent to the entry of an order containing the requirements of Act 1 of 1989, Second Extraordinary Session, to the extent it is not inconsistent with this settlement. 12III. State's Role in the Desegregation Process A. Monitoring Compensatory Education The State shall be required (as a non-party) to monitor. through the ADE, the implementation of compensatory education programs by the Districts. If necessary as a last resort, ADE may petition the court for modification or changes in such programs being implemented by the Districts (but not for a reduction in the agreed level of State funding). If such petitions are filed. the undersigned parties will not object based upon lac)c of standing. ADE shall provide regular written monitoring reports to the parties and the court. Monitoring by the State shall be independent of that of the other parties. It is being done to ensure that the State will have a continuing role in satisfactorily remediating achievement disparities. Any recommendations made by ADE shall not form the basis of any additional funding responsibilities of the State. A State plan for monitoring implementation of compensatory education will be submitted to the parties within 60 days following execution of the settlement agreement. B. Statement of Support for the Plans The State, Districts and Joshua will provide to the court a statement of full support for the Plans 13upon final approval of the settlement. This statement of support will not be construed to burden the State with additional funding obligations beyond those existing at the time of the execution of this agreement except those specifically set forth in this agreement. C. Petition for Election The State will join LRSD if LRSD petitions the court to allow it to hold a millage election. D. Statutes and Regulations Affecting Desegregation The ADE will research and list laws that impede desegregation and submit legislation to repeal such laws to the General Assembly as soon as practicable. ADE will not knowingly promulgate or retain any regulations which impede desegregation. and the other parties will notify ADE of any regulations which they believe would have such an effect. If any regulation is demonstrated to have such an effect, the regulation will be modified or repealed or an exemptioA will be provided. The Districts, Knight and Joshua will assist the ADE in identifying existing and proposed statutes and regulations that impede desegregation.  E. Elimination of State Funding for the Pulaski County Education Service Cooperative State funding for the Pulaski County Education Service has ceased and the funds were reallocated 14to the Metropolitan Supervisor by order of the Court. Should these funds no longer be required by the Metropolitan Supervisor, they will be used to assist the ADE in securing the services of trained consultants to develop effective compensatory, remedial education programs designed to eliminate achievement disparities between black and white students and for other purposes intended to enhance desegregation. F. Commitment to Principles The State remains committed to the following principles: a. There should be remediation of the a racial academic achievement disparities for Arkansas students. b. Special education classes and gifted and talented classes should not be racially identifiable. c. The ADE and the Districts should work cooperatively to promote the desegregation goals of the State and the Districts and to ensure educational excellence in the public schools in Pulaski County and throughout the State. G. Remediation of Disparities in Academic Achievement The ADE, with the assistance of the Court's desegregation expert(s), will develop and will search 15 ifor programs to remediate achievement disparities between black and white students. If necessary to develop such programs, the ADE will employ appropriately trained and experienced consultants in the field of remediation of racial achievement disparities and/or hire as staff members persons with such training and experience. The remediation of racial achievement disparities shall remain a high priority with the ADE. H. Test Validation ADE will conduct periodic reviews of tests used in the States testing program to determine if students race. sex, or culture adversely affect their test scores. If bias is found in any test. that test will not be used unless modified to eliminate the bias. I. In-Service Training ADE will establish in-service programs to assist in providing training for the staffs of desegregating school districts. Such programs will first be made available to the Districts. J. Recruitment of Minority Teachers The Districts will annually supply ADE information identifying the subject areas in which they have actual or foreseeable shortages of minority teachers. The ADE will then obtain from higher education sources information by race on new teacher 16graduates in those subject areas and make such information available to the Districts. ADE will seek to increase the pool of minority teachers available to the Districts and to other districts in the state through recruitment efforts both in and out of state, and at the same time shall develop annual profiles of teachers available by race, specialty. subject area and area of certification. K. Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates The ADE will work with the Arkansas Department of Higher Education to reduce any racial disparity that may exist in the distribution of existing scholarships and to secure passage of legislation to financially assist minority students attending Arkansas colleges and universities who commit to become teachers in Arkansas, including scholarships for freshmen and sophomores who are committed to pursuing a teacher-training program and juniors and seniors who have been accepted in teacher education programs. L. Minority Recruitment for ADE Staff The ADE will develop and implement a plan to identify jobs and consultant positions within the Department in which minorities are underrepresented and will recruit and employ minority applicants for those positions so as to create balanced. a desegregated staff at all levels. 17M. School Construction The ADE will develop criteria for site selection of new schools. major school expansion and school closings. ADE will require that a district applying to it for approval of new construction or major school expansion provide desegregation impact a statement setting forth evidence that the proposed improvements do not have a segregative effect. ADE will not recommend or approve the site of any school in any county contiguous to Pulaski County if the construction or expansion of the school at the requested location of such school will have a substantial negative impact on any District's ability to desegregate. IV. Dismissal of Litigation A. Dismissal of the State with Prejudice and Release The State conditions this settlement upon its dismissal from this Litigation with prejudice in accordance with the terms of Attachment A. The settlement is also conditioned upon the full execution of and compliance with the terms of the release of all claims against the State affixed hereto as Attachment A. The settlement of the State's liability, while contingent on the district court's approval, is not contingent upon court approval of any District's plan or finding of 18 aunitary status for any District. Further, the settlement is contingent upon a determination by the district court that the settlement is binding on the classes of all current, past and future LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD black students. their parents and next friends. As part of this settlement. the parties stipulate that the Joshua Intervenors are proper class representatives under and otherwise meet the requirements of Rule 23(a) and {b)2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and support their approval. The settlement is also conditioned upon the full execution of the releases of the Districts attached as Attachments B, C and D. The parties pledge to diligently pursue acceptance of the settlement by the court. B. Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua and the Districts D Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised. in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the Districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans. C. Reserved Issue / J The Districts and Joshua contend that ADE has the authority to regulate private schools and should exercise that authority to insure that private 19schools comply with the same educational standards that are applicable to public schools. ADE is not persuaded that it is vested with such authority. The parties therefore agree that the issue of State regulation of private schools is not settled by this agreement and may be presented to the court for resolution at a future date. As this settlement provides for the dismissal with prejudice of the State as a party to this Litigation, the ADE agrees to make a special appearance following such dismissal for the sole purpose of responding to a motion filed by any of the Districts or Joshua seeking the resolution of the single question of its legal authority to regulate private schools and require them to comply with certain educational standards. A finding that the ADE has such authority shall not be used by any party as the basis for any State liability for the period prior to such finding. V. Attorneys' Fees LRSD agrees to make no additional claims for attorneys' fees and to hold the State, PCSSD and NLRSD harmless for all pending LRSD claims for attorneys' fees against the State, PCSSD and NLRSD. If necessary to enforce the hold harmless agreement, the State will be entitled to deduct the amount of any payment for LRSD attorneys' fees made after the execution 20of this agreement from any payment due from the State to LRSD under this agreement more than five months after the attorneys' fees payment is made. The State, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD will pay attorneys' fees and costs to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF). The fees will be paid upon terms set forth below for the work performed in this Litigation and other litigation which preceded this Litigation beginning with Aaron v. Cooper, Graves v. Board of Education and their progeny. The payment to LDF is on behalf of, and for the work of, all attorneys who have worked with LDF on behalf of the interests of black children in the Districts, to desegregate schools therein. over the duration of the Litigation. The amount is exclusive of the payments heretofore made by any of the parties. The State's portion of the fee will be $750,000 (Seven Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars)\nthe LRSD's portion shall be $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars)\nthe PCSSD's portion shall be $300,000 (Three Hundred Thousand Dollars)\nand NLRSD's portion shall be $100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars), which shall include settlement of fees for the voting rights action also pending in this court of which settlement on the merits is contemplated shortly. All such payments shall be due and payable on final approval except for the payments due from the PCSSD and NLRSD. The PCSSD payment shall mature six years from the date of final approval of the settlement. The NLRSD shall make two payments each in the amount of $50,000 (Fifty Thousand Dollars) no later than 10 days of final approval of 21the settlement and July 1, 1990, respectively. The State will advance LRSDs share of the fees and reduce total payments due LRSD under this agreement by that amount. The amounts will be deducted in the final years of payment to LRSD. The parties are satisfied that over the thirty-three years of this Litigation, Joshua and its predecessor parties, all of whom have been represented by attorneys for the LDF have expended time and incurred costs for which they have not been compensated. The parties are also satisfied, upon a review of their own time records and costs in this Litigation over the last five years, that the payment is fair and reasonable and consistent with the payments made over that period of time to counsel for the other parties. The parties also agree for purposes of this settlement that Joshua is a prevailing party for purposes of relief. VI. The LRSD Settlement A. Payment Schedule and Terms The State will make the following payments to the LRSD (or any successor district or districts to which the territory now within LRSD may be assigned or for the benefit of the students in such territory if the State or any other entity becomes responsible for the education) on or before the dates indicated\n22(1\u0026gt; Payments for compensatory education programs and other desegregation expenses will be as follows: Within 10 days of Final Approval $4,475,000 January 1, 1990 3,475,000 July 1, 1990 4,609,250 January 1, 1991 3,609,250 July 1, 1991 4,747,528 January 1, 1992 3,747,528 July 1, 1992 4,889,954 January 1, 1993 3,889,954 July 1, 1993 5,036,652 January 1, 1994 4,036,652 July 1, 1994 4,057,460 January 1, 1995 3,057,460 July 1, 1995 2,985,131 January 1, 1996 1,985,131 July 1, 1996 1,844,811 January 1, 1997 / 844,811 -V July 1, 1997 1,266,770 January 1, 1998 266,770 I I July 1, 1998 152,387 I January 1, 1999 152,387 $59,129,886 23 (2) The State will make additional payments to LRSD totaling $13,870,114 over a seven year period as set forth below: Within 10 days of Final Approval $2,000,000 7/1/90 $2,000,000 7/1/91 $2,000,000 7/1/92 $2,000,000 7/1/93 $2,000,000 7/1/94 - $2,000,000 7/1/95 $1,870,114 These payments are cash equivalent payments in lieu of formula guarantees for LRSD provided for in an earlier signed version of this settlement. B. Loan Provisions In addition to the above-mentioned payments, the State agrees to provide loans to LRSD (or any successor district or districts to which the territory now within LRSD may be assigned or for the benefit of the students in such territory if the State or any other entity becomes responsible for their education) between July 1 , 1989 and July 1, 1999 in cumulative amount of not more than a $20,000,000.00 on the following terms: (1) Each loan will be amortized over a 20-year period to be paid in full to an escrow account established by the parties as described below with 20 24equal annual payments of principal beginning seven years following the execution of the loan\n(2) No more than $6,000,000 will be loaned in any biennium and no loan will be made before July 1, 1989\n(3) Each loan will bear interest beginning seven years following the execution of the loan at the rate of three percent (3%) per annum. such interest to be paid annually at the time of the annual principal payments to an escrow account established by the parties as described below\n(4) The proceeds of the loans shall be made payable to a trust governed by a trust committee consisting of the Director of the Department of Education (or designee), the LRSD Superintendent (or designee) and a designee of Joshua. The loan proceeds shall be used for desegregation purposes including, but not limited to, school construction or renovation, salaries of instructional personnel, purchase of instructional equipment and supplies, program development and implementation costs. 25consultants' fees and and staff development training of LRSD principals and teachers to promote desegregation. The loan proceeds will not be utilized directly or indirectly as a vehicle for generating income for LRSD through higher interest rates\n(5) The loan(s) will be secured by a first lien in favor of the State on existing. extended or new millages (whichever the State chooses) , such first lien to be assured by an opinion letter to the benefit of the State from LRSD's bond counsel\n(6) LRSD and the State will establish a joint escrow account into which all principal and interest due on loans made under this agreement will be paid. If at any time between the date of this agreement and December 31, 2000 the composite scores of LRSD black students (excluding special education students) on a standardized test agreed upon by the State and LRSD are 90% or greater of the composite scores of LRSD white students (excluding special education students) , the escrowed funds will be 26paid to LRSD and any outstanding loans will be forgiven. If the 90% goal is not reached by December 31, 2000, the escrow funds will be paid to the State and any outstanding loans will continue to be repaid according to the schedule set forth in this agreement. The intent of this subsection is that LRSD will receive twenty million dollars plus any accrued interest if its goal of increasing student achievement as described in this subsection is reached and that the State will be repaid in full amount of all loans plus interest if LRSD does not reach its goal. VII. The PCSSD Settlement A. Financial Settlement PCSSD and Joshua have asserted claims and potential claims against the State on behalf of PCSSD students relating to miscalculation of MFPA, the State's role in the Granite Mountain transfer and compensatory education needs. The following provisions are made to settle all such claims and any others which have been or could have been made by PCSSD or Joshua against the State on behalf of PCSSD students. 271. Magnet Payments The ADE shall, beginning with the 1989-90 school year, make payments of school aid for PCSSD magnet students directly to PCSSD which shall in turn reimburse LRSD at the rate of $1,550 per PCSSD magnet school student being educated in LRSD magnet schools less any magnet surplus credit available under paragraph II.B. herein. The State may. at its option, continue the direct payment to the LRSD of the remaining $1,550 of magnet school operational costs for PCSSD magnet students or may make such aid payments for PCSSD magnet students directly to PCSSD. If the latter option is selected, then PCSSD shall make total payments to LRSD of $3,100 per year for each PCSSD magnet student or the appropriate pro rata share of said $3,100 if such students are magnet students for less than the full school year less any magnet surplus credit available under II.B. herein. 2. Other Payments (a) The State shall make the following six scheduled payments to PCSSD: Within 10 days of Final Approval $3,000,000 07/01/90 $3,000,000 07/01/91 $2,500,000 07/01/92 $2,500,000 07/01/93 $2,500,000 07/01/94 $2,500,000 28as (b) The State shall make the following payments cash equivalents in lieu of the Temporary Formula and the transportation aid adjustment set out in an earlier signed version of this settlement\nWithin 10 days of Final Approval $1,000,000 B. 7/1/90 7/1/91 7/1/92 7/1/93 7/1/94 7/1/95 Staff Development $1,500,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 PCSSD is exploring the utility of a program under which all certified staff would experience three college hours of course work in Black History or other similar course offering. PCSSD IS exploring and evaluating this concept to facilitate its efforts to reduce the achievement disparity between black and white students. ADE and PCSSD recognize and understand that such a program, if it required PCSSD to fully fund presently prevailing college tuition charges, would be prohibitively expensive. ADE pledges to use its best efforts to work with appropriate Arkansas colleges and universities to facilitate a special arrangement which would significantly reduce the cost of such a program to PCSSD and 29make it financially possible to implement. ADE assxunes no additional financial responsibility pursuant to this commitment. C. Food Services LRSD agrees to contract with PCSSD for any food products which LRSD can obtain from PCSSD at the same or lower cost than LRSD can obtain the same quality products from other vendors. D. Housing ADE agrees to use its best efforts to influence appropriate state agencies to assist PCSSD in its efforts to promote and secure scattered site housing in the PCSSD by securing and providing, to the extent feasible, state owned or controlled land suitable for such use. VIII. The NLRSD Settlement NLRSD and Joshua have asserted claims and potential claims against the State on behalf of NLRSD students relating to miscalculation of MFPA and to compensatory education needs. The following provisions are made to settle all such claims and any others which have been or could have been made by NLRSD or Joshua against the State on behalf of NLRSD students. A. Magnet Payments The ADE shall, beginning with the 1989-90 school year, make payments of school aid for NLRSD magnet students directly to NLRSD which shall in turn 30reimburse LRSD at the rate of $1,550 per NLRSD magnet school student being educated in LRSD magnet schools less any magnet surplus credit available under paragraph II.B. herein. The State may, at its option, continue the direct payment to the LRSD of the remaining $1,550 of magnet school operational costs for NLRSD magnet students or may make such aid payments for NLRSD magnet students directly to NLRSD. If the latter option is selected, then NLRSD shall make total payments to the LRSD of $3,100 per year per each NLRSD magnet student or the appropriate pro-rata share of said $3,100 if such students are magnet students for less than the full school year less any magnet surplus credit available under paragraph II.B. herein. B, Compensatory Education Payments Beginning with the 1989-90 school year and continuing through the 1995-96 school year, the State will, on July 1 of each year, pay NLRSD $389,025 (a total of $2,723,175 for the seven year period). C. Additional Payments As additional compensatory education assistance. beginning with the 1990-91 school year and continuing through the 1996-97 school year. the NLRSD will receive payments to support the reduction of the percentage of the total black student population that 31is in its special education program. The formula for such payments is as follows: (1) The first step is to determine a Base Year, or starting point. to which placements in further years will be compared. The October 1, 1987 general enrollment data and the December, 1987 special education count will be used to establish this base and calculations pursuant to this formula will be based on those counts in future years. On October 1, 1987, the NLRSD had 4083 black students, including those attending magnet schools. (Total Black Population \"TBP\") and 805 black students were in special education, including those attending magnet schools, (Blacks in Special Education \"BSE\") in December, 1987. Thus, 19.72% of the District's total black population was in special education (\"Black Placement Rate\"). (2) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) below and solely for determining the amount of these formula payments, the NLRSD will receive the State Base Equalization Rate (SBER) multiplied by the special education weights for the difference between the number of black students actually in special education and the number that would have been in special education if there had been no reduction in the BPR since the Base Year. Because of delayed year financing, the student counts will be taken in school 32years 1989-90 through 1995-96 but payments for those counts will be made in 1990-91 through 1996-97 using the payment year's SBER. By way of illustration. if the TBP in 1989-90 is 4212, applying the BPR for the Base Year would result in .1972 X 4212, or 830.6, black students in special education. If the actual number is 772, the District would be entitled to payment for the special education weights (average .714 per student) for 58.6 students. which would result in 41.8 weights. (3) Since the District cannot control placement decisions in other districts, for purposes of this formula black students who transfer into the NLRSD already placed in special education by their original school district will be excluded from the count of TBP and BSE for their first year of enrollment in the NLRSD to the extent that those incoming transfers exceed black students in special education who transfer from the NLRSD to other districts. For example, if 52 black special education students transfer into the NLRSD between the 1988-89 and 1989-90 school years while only 37 transfer out. 15 black students would be excluded from the TBP and BSE in 1989-90 for the purpose of this formula. Thus, the NLRSD would be counted as only having 4197 TBP instead of 4212 and 757 BSE instead of 772 and would be paid for the special education weights associated 33with the difference between 827.6 and 757 BSE, i.e., 70.6. (4) As further support for the reduction of black students placed in special education and solely for the purpose of determining the amount of the payments, the NLRSD will be entitled to payment for the special education weights associated with the difference between the number of students removed from special education in the NLRSD and placed in the regular program in the NLRSD and those moved from the regular NLRSD program and placed in special education in the NLRSD. For example, if between 1988-89 and 1989-90 the District removed 83 black students from special education and placed 64 in special education. the District would be paid for the special education weights for an additional 19 students, which would result in 13.6 weights. (5) A list of names (and identification numbers. if available) of the special education students referred to in paragraph ,3 and 4 above. will be provided to the Arkansas Department of Education, before any payment is made under these provisions. (6) Because of delayed year financing, the operation of this formula will not result in any additional funds until 1990-91. Presently, the SBER IS $1,944.55 and. assuming $74.00 per year 34 aincrease, it would be $2,018 in 1990-91. Using the above examples, this would generate $129,757. (7) The District may continue to receive payments under this formula only through the 1996-97 school year (inclusive) but in no event will the District receive more than $2,344,055 cumulatively through the operation of this formula. The limit of the State's obligation under this formula IS $1,276,825. If the eimount of the payments exceeds $1,276,825, LRSD and PCSSD agree to pay those excess amounts up to the point that either (a) the over-all payments to NLRSD under this formula reach $2,344,055 or (b) the expiration of the formula, whichever comes first. (8) Any payments required of LRSD and PCSSD under paragraph (7) will be shared on the basis of 75% for LRSD and 25% for PCSSD. (9) If, when the formula expires, the formula has generated less than $1,276,825, the State will pay the difference between what it has paid and $1,276,825 to LRSD and PCSSD on the basis of 75% to LRSD and 25% to PCSSD. (10) Any payments made pursuant to this formula will be separate from the District's usual MFPA payments. 35D. Description of Additional Compensatory Education Programs Within fifteen days of the final approval of this settlement, the NLRSD will develop a description of the compensatory education programs to be developed with the additional compensatory education funds made available through this settlement and will petition the court to amend NLRSD's Plan accordingly. The State, Joshua, and the Districts will support the NLRSD in this effort. IX. Execution A. This Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement of March, 1989, is executed as revised by counsel with authority of their clients this 28th day of September, 1989. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTR: By(r Christopher Helle, One of Its Attorneys PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO._1 By:_ M.^^amue jOne of I 1 Jones . / ts Attorneys 36 * * * NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRIC By: StepW^n W. Jones One of Its Attorneys * ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Z}  By: H. William Allen One of Its Attorneys JOSHUA INTERVENORS By: C6hn W. Walker One of Their Attorneys KNIGHT HT ^TERVENORS By: Pau^J. Ward One'^of Their Attorneys 31 /Shn M- WalkiPKRELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE For and in consideration of its payments and commitments set forth in the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement to which this release is attached (hereafter, \"the Consideration\"), the undersigned parties do hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the State of Arkansas, its constitutional officers, elected officials, appointees, employees, agencies, departments, their predecessors and successors including, but not limited to, the Arkansas State Board of Education and its members (hereafter collectively referred to as \"the Released Parties\") of and from any and all actions, causes of action, claims and demands which the undersigned now have or may hereafter have arising out of or in any way related to any acts or omissions of any and every kind to the date of the execution of this release by the released parties which in any way relate to racial discrimination or segregation in public education in the three school districts in Pulaski County, Arkansas or to the violation of constitutional or other rights of school children based on race or color in the three school districts in Pulaski County, Arkansas. It is understood and agreed that the Consideration is valuable and is given in full and final compromise of disputed claims and that the giving of the Consideration is not to be construed as an admission of any liability on the part of any of the Released Parties beyond ATTACHMENT A2 the liability found to date by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and that the terms of this release are contractual and not a mere recital. It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District vs. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al. No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed with prejudice as to the Arkansas State Board of Education and the former and current members of that board named in the Litigation. We have read this release and had it explained to us by our attorneys who have signed as witnesses hereto and we understand that the above referenced payments or commitments are in full and final compromise of any and all claims and causes of action. We understand that in the event all parties for which there is a signature blank below do not sign this release, the release is effective and binding on those parties that do sign. EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 200 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 By:_____________________ Christopher Heller One of its Attorneys LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT By______________________________ President, Board of Directors3 EXECUTED THIS day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 By:____________________ M. Samuel Jones One of its Attorneys By______________________________ President, Board of Directors EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: JACK LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, AR 72201 By:____________________ Stephen W. Jones One of its Attorneys NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT By______________________________ President, Board of Directors EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: (NAACP) LEGAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS By____________________ Norman J. Chachkin One of its Attorneys By__________________________ LRSD Class Representative By.____________________________ President, Little Rock, Arkansas Branch of the NAACP and JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. By_____ NLRSD Class Representative 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 and President of the North Little Rock, Arkansas Branch of the NAACP By__________________ John W. Walker One of its Attorneys By___________________________ PCSSD Class Representative4 * * EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL 1014 W. Third Little Rock, AR By____________________ Richard W. Roachell One of its Attorneys KNIGHT INTERVENORS 72201 By____________________ LRCTA Representative By___________________ PACT Representative By_____________________ NLRCTA RepresentativeRELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE LRSD For and in consideration of its relinquishment of claims and commitments set forth in the Plans and the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement to which this release IS attached (hereafter, \"the Consideration\"), the undersigned parties do hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the LRSD, its directors, administrators, appointees. employees, agencies, departments, their predecessors and successors (hereafter collectively referred to as \"the Released Parties\") of and from any and all actions, causes of action, claims and demands which the undersigned now have or may hereafter have arising out of or in any way related to any acts or omissions of any and every kind to the date of the execution of this release by the released parties which in any way relate to racial discrimination. segregation in public education, or to violations of other constitutional or statutory rights of school children, based on race or color. in the three school districts in Pulaski County, Arkansas. It is understood and agreed that the Consideration is valuable and is given in full and final compromise of disputed claims and that the giving of the Consideration IS not to be construed as an admission of any liability on the part of any of the Released Parties beyond the liability found to date by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and ATTACHMENT B 2 that the terms of this release are contractual and not a mere recital. It is further understood and agreed that thelitigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District vs. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al, No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (including, but not limited to. Cooper V. Aaron, Norwood V. Tucker and Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District) (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed with prejudice as to the LRSD and the former and current members of its board named in the Litigation. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the Court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans. We have read this release and had it explained to us by our attorneys who have signed as witnesses hereto and we understand that the above referenced relinquishment of claims and commitments are in full and final compromise of any and all claims and causes of action. We understand that in the event all parties for which there is a signature blank below do not sign this release, the release is effective and binding on those parties that do sign.3 EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: ALLEN LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 1200 Worthen Bank Bldg. ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Little Rock, AR 72201 By_____________________________ Chairman, Board of Directors By:____________________ H. William Allen One of its Attorneys EXECUTED THIS day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 Little Rock, AR 72201 By:_____________________ M. Samuel Jones One of its Attorneys By______________________________ President, Board of Directors EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: * WITNESSED AND APPROVED: JACK LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, AR 72201 By____________________ Stephen W. Jones One of its Attorneys By______________________________ President, Board of Directors * * EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: (NAACP) LEGAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS By____________________ Norman J. Chachkin One of its Attorneys By__________________________ LRSD Class Representative and By_____________________________ President, Little Rock, Arkansas Branch of the NAACP/ 4 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 By____________________ John W. Walker One of its Attorneys By_____________________________ NLRSD Class Representative and President of the North Little Rock, Arkansas Branch of the NAACP By___________________________ PCSSD Class Representative EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL KNIGHT INTERVENORS 1014 W. Third Little Rock, AR 72201 By___________._________ LRCTA Representative By____________________ Richard W. Roachell One of its Attorneys By___________________ PACT Representative * By_____________________ NLRCTA RepresentativeRELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE PCSSD For and in consideration of its relinquishment of claims and commitments set forth in the Plans and the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement to which this release is attached (hereafter, \"the Consideration\"), the undersigned parties do hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the PCSSD, its directors, administrators, appointees, employees, agencies, departments, their predecessors and successors (hereafter collectively referred to as \"the Released Parties\") of and from any and all actions. causes of action, claims and demands which the undersigned now have or may hereafter have arising out of or in any way related to any acts or omissions of any and every kind to the date of the execution of this release by the released parties which in any way relate to racial discrimination, segregation in public education, or to violations of other constitutional or statutory rights of school children. based on race or color. in the three school districts in Pulaski County, Arkansas. It is understood and agreed that the Consideration is valuable and is given in full and final compromise of disputed claims and that the giving of the Consideration is not to be construed as an admission of any liability on the part of any of the Released Parties beyond the liability found to date by the United States District Court for the Eastern ATTACHMENT C2 District of Arkansas and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and that the terms of this release are contractual and not a mere recital. It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District vs. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al, No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (including, but not limited to. Zinnamon v. Pulaski County School District, LR-C-68-154) (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed with prejudice as to the PCSSD and the former and current members of its board named in the Litigation. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the Court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation of the Plans. We have read this release and had it explained to us by our attorneys who have signed as witnesses hereto and we understand that the above referenced relinquishment of claims and commitments are in full and final compromise of any and all claims and causes of action. We understand that in the event all parties for which there is a signature blank below do not sign this release, the release is effective and binding on those parties that do sign.3 EXECUTED this day of , 1989 by: WITNESSED AND APPROVED: FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 By:____________________ Christopher Heller\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_790","title":"Summer school","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989/2004"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","School superintendents","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["Summer school"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/790"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["55 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nAssociate for Instruction to the Deputy superintendent REPORTS to\nDeputy Superintendent JOB goal\nTo assist the Deputy Superintendent in the task of providing leadership, support, and direction in the area of instruction by providing building principals with a vehicle to more effectively utilize the division of instruction to improve teaching and learning. This will be accomplished at the direction of the Deputy Superintendent through staff development, school improvement, inservice education, safety and security, development of programs, and allocation of resources. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES\n1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Attends Board of Directors' meetings, as necessary, and prepares such reports for the Board as the Deputy Superintendent may request. Serves as the chief advisor to the Deputy Superintendent pertaining to instruction. Serves as a member of the Superintendent's Cabinet. Monitors instruction K-12. Works with Educational Programs staff and principals to determine educational program priorities and goals for the district and schools. Provides leadership and support to assistant supertindents for schools operations and to principals so that they can conduct effective building level needs assessments. Assumes responsibility for conducting the personnel evaluation of personnel as may be assigned by the Deputy Superintendent. Assumes responsibility for assisting the Assistant Superintendents for school Operations, Educational Programs staff and principals to encourage and involve community, staff and students, when appropriate, in decision making related to educational programs and instruction.PU^E POST .JTTI.K KOCK SCHOOL DISTRlCi 810 WE.9T MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PI .EASE POM April 6, 1989 rhG Little Rock School District is ing position for the 1989-90 now accepting applications for the fol I school year\now - POSITION: Deputy Superintendent QUALIFICATIONS: Minimum of a master's degree\ndoctorate preferred. 1. 2. tion from the State of Arkansas. certificate m school adnlnlstra- 3. High personal and professional integrity. 4. Successful setting. experience as an administrator in an integrated urban 5. Strong management credentials in the area of finance operations, and long range planning.  personnel, 6. Demonstrates an administrative style which is flexible preceptive of the views of others. rrexioie ) open, and 7. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality integrated education. REPORTS TO\nSuperintendent JOB GOAL\n( __________   ^dtlCStlOnsl phi 10 S OOhv 205]? u J. 3 that directly benefl? each indiyiduil on a constant, ongoing basis, the translation of the dis- SALARY\nAnnual twelve (12) month contract comms responsibilities plus benefits package. commensurate with experience and EVALUATION: Performance of this position will be evaluated orovi o -47 t\"yannually in accordance Personnel?  policy on Evaluation with the of Administrative DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS: Apr I I 21, 1989Pago Two (2) Deputy Superintendent SEND LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO: Harold Webb Associates Attention: 525 Winnetka Avenue Suite 1 Houston Conley (Little Rock) Winnetka, Ill. 60090 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: qualifications, application setting forth in detail personal interest in the position, experience, reasons for and most significant accomplishments as a school administrator. Send current resume and a list of four personal references who can be contacted including names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers. Request that your university credentials be sent to Harold Webb Associates. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYERLittle Rock School District January 7, 1992 a sOSl Ml J7=5n n Mrs. Ann Brown, Desegregation Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 JAN 1 5 OuiCu Cl 'ioi'idcnng Dear Mrs. Brown: The Board of Directors will Superintendent of Schools to succeed Dr. soon begin searching for Cl Ruth Steele, who new has announced her plans to retire at the end of this school year. The nationwide search will be conducted by co-consultants, Jan Cummings, president of C-Net\nand Susan Jernigan of Sockwell \u0026amp; Anderson. Ms. Cummings and Ms. Sockwell will be in Little Rock on January 17 and 18 to gather information about the school district and the type of individual the community wants the Board to employ. To that end, the co-consultants and Board members have scheduled private meetings with groups closely associated with the school district to receive information concerning the qualifications, both personal and professional, superintendent of schools. that the community desires in a You and your staff are cordially invited to attend a meeting with the co-consultants and Board members on Saturday, January 18 at 1p.m. to share your thoughts. This meeting will be conducted in the Board Room of the Administration Building at 810 West Markham Street. This will be an informal, roundtable discussion, so please feel free to dress casually. Sincerely, O. G. Jacovelli, President J Board of Directors J- 810 West Marhham Street Little Roch, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000May 5, 1992 Ms. Pat Gee Arkansas State Highway Dept. 10324 Interstate 30 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Ms. Gee: As taxpayers in the Little Rock School District, we feel that now is the time for the Little Rock School Board to deal effectively with the needs of the district as well as being sensitive to the needs of the majority of the patrons of the district. The Board must hire an African American Superintendent. It is because of the current high rate of failure for African American students in the Little Rock School District that we support the hiring of an African American Superintendent. There are many factors which have resulted in this very high statistic. Realizing that all of the blame does not belong to the schools, the schools must share some of the responsibility for this problem. There have not been programs or directed curriculum which have dealt with the problems of our children effectively. The fact that the district is 68% African American is a most prevalent statistic which should be considered in the hiring of a Superintendent. We need a Superintendent who can relate to the majority complexion of the district, as well as addressing the most urgent needs of our educational system. At this time, the hiring of a Superintendent who can alleviate our problems and bring our district into focus is most imperative. You must consider the most urgent needs of the district, as well as doing what is best to bring the majority on equal standards as the minority. For too long, the School Board has addressed the needs of the minority and neglected the needs of the majority. The solution for a district such as ours demands special cons ideration. You must consider the fact that African-Americans represent the majority of students in the Little Rock School District, and black patrons and students should be given special consideration in light of the years of neglect. Very truly yours.1. 2 . 3 . 4. 5. 6. 7. Patron's List 9 10, 11V 12 . 13. 14 . 15. 16. ( 17. 18 . 19 . 20. 21. 22 . 23 . 24 . 25. - H2 /z I i 1 I  '. iRECEIVED MAR 1 1993 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTER DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Office of Desegregation Monitoring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C- PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. Wed U.S.OISTHICTCOURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS DEPENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. - \\ -co:\nJ 7 J INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. :7r3, CLERK INTERVENORS Ey:. D.-.CL\nMOTION TO REQUIRE THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DEFINE THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT AND TO DETERMINE WHETHER PAYMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE OR PROMISED BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS TO SAID CONTRACT The Joshua Intervenors respectfully move the Court to require the Little Rock School District to set forth the terms and conditions of the employment contract between it and Superintendent Cloyde \"Mac\" Bernd. Although that contract is a public matter, the public records regarding same are uncertain. The Joshua Intervenors also request that the Little Rock School District disclose whether it has entered into an contractual arrangement or other arrangement with any group of private citizens to supplement the pay of Mr. Cloyde \"Mac\" Bernd. Joshua is concerned that where private money is paid to public officials without there being public accountability, the public officials may be subject to undue influence of their private benefactors. In this case, the private benefactors, on information and belief. are a group of wealthy citizens from the business sector of the community which is historically all white, but is now tokenly integrated by the presence of black businessman. The School District has a a /7\u0026lt;^/the community and to do the bidi opposition to the more legitimat school children. The Joshua i because the school district, in superintendent's position, did nc $50,000.00 supplement to the pay private group. This factor may h 6 in Lty ist\nhe a by .on of the school board's first cht ird members Jacovelli and one other-of a person of African American descent who rejected the position. The Joshua Intervenors contend that there was a different offer made to that person than to the Superintendent Bernd and that this constitutes a further act of discrimination in addition to being without appropriate legal authority by the school board. WHEREFORE, premises considered. the Joshua Intervenors respectfully request the court to have the school district of Little Rock set forth the terms of the offers made to Superintendent Bernd and to applicant Williams from Syracuse, New York for the position of Superintendent\nto advise whether the district entered into a private arrangement with the group known as \"Fifty for the Future\" to supplement the pay of any person employed by the Little Rock School District and the terms and writings thereof\nand to determine the extent to which payments have been made by Fifty for the Future to Cloyde \"Mac\" Bernd, or on his behalf. Respectfully submitted. the community and to do the bidding of those interests often in opposition to the more legitimate interests and needs of minority school children. The Joshua interest is also being manifest because the school district, in soliciting applications for the superintendent's position, did not disclose that there would be a $50,000.00 supplement to the pay of the superintendent selected by private group. This factor may have been decisive in the decision of the school board's first choice-without the votes of board members Jacovelli and one other-of a person of African American descent who rejected the position. The Joshua Intervenors contend that there was a different offer made to that person than to the Superintendent Bernd and that this constitutes a further act of discrimination in addition to being without appropriate legal authority by the school board. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully request the court to have the school district of Little Rock set forth the terms of the offers made to Superintendent Bernd and to applicant Williams from Syracuse, New York for the position of Superintendent\nto advise whether the district entered into a private arrangement with the group known as \"Fifty for the Future K to supplement the pay of any person employed by the Little Rock School District and the terms and writings thereof\nand to determine the extent to which payments have been made by Fifty for the Future to Cloyde \"Mac\" Bernd, or on his behalf. Respectfully submitted.By: JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (5 w. 72206 Walker, Bar No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to all counsel,,sn thi February, 1993. n W. Walker11 RCEjVED D MAY 2 5 1993 Office of Desegregation Mcnitcnng IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 2 1 1993 Ci,Ml \u0026gt;X LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER There are pending before the Court numerous motions filed by the Joshua Intervenors. Some of the motions have been responded to\nothers have not. In reviewing the motions, it appears to the Court that the motion for hearing on the PCSSD's proposed -i  reorganization filed May 20, 1992 [Doc. #1597] and the motion for extension of time to submit statement of costs and fees filed August 17, 1992 [Doc. #1657] are moot. It also seems, considering the motion. response, and subsequent monitoring report on the North Little Rock High School cheerleaders and drill team, that the issue of the cheerleaders and drill team at the NLR High School-West Campus filed July 20, 1992 [Doc. #1637] has been resolved and that motion is moot. The Joshua motion for extension of time to respond filed August #1655] is also moot. 13, 1992 [Doc. It further appears to the Court, in light of the fact that no response or further pleadings have been filed, that the following motions are moot and are denied as such: 1. Motion to intervene and for preliminary injunction 4 concerning the selection of cheerleaders at Pulaski Heights Junior High School filed June 24, #1622]\n1992 [Doc. 2. Motion for Defendants PCSSD and NLRSD to make adjustments in their school lines to comply with one man - one vote principles of 14th amendment and Voting Rights Act filed August 17, 1992 [Doc. #1658]\nresponses filed August 28, 1992 [Doc. #1665 \u0026amp; #1666]\n3. Motion to compel the LRSD to consult with Joshua and other parties prior to making desegregation plan alterations which require court approval filed February 2, 1993 [Doc. #1745]\n4. Motion to require the LRSD to define the terms and conditions of the superintendent's contract and to determine whether payments have been made or promised by private individuals to said contract filed February 26, 1993 [Doc. #1764]\nMotion for further relief regarding employment of unqualified persons in major administrative positions filed March 16, 1993 [Doc. #1777]\n5. Also before the Court is a motion by the LRSD for an extension of time to file its plan for the construction of the Stephens Interdistrict School filed September 3, 1992 [Doc. #1673]. That motion is moot because the LRSD filed the Stephens School plan on September 8, 1992. The Clerk is directed to remove the above motions from the pending motions report. The Court has stated in the past that it expects the parties to confer in good faith on issues in dispute and to consult the monitor in an attempt to resolve their differences without the intervention of the Court. While many of the motions brought before the Court in this case involve issues requiring Court approval, others concern disputes that could be resolved by a good -2-faith effort at communication and cooperation. In the future, the Court will require that those motions contain a statement that the parties have conferred in good faith and that the issue cannot be resolved without the intervention of the Court. In addition, the Court expects the parties to comply with Local Rule 20 concerning the filing of briefs in support of motions. SO ORDERED this day of May, 1993. UNITED JUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET 9HffiT M COMFUIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON -3-e Dear Mrs. Ann Brown: June 25, 1993 JUL 1 1993 Ofiice of Dessgregation Wo: i.g I have worked as a volunteer in the LRSD for many years. I have a son at Central High School and two children who are graduates of Central. My two graduates have been admitted and are attending very prestigious colleges with academic scholarships due to the quality education they received in the LRSD. I am deeply concerned with the fate of our district and the selection of top administrators for superintendent and associate superintendent. Many other patrons are concerned about the stability of the LRSD which seems to be getting worse instead of better. I sat with a group of parents this past weekend who discussed growing concerns about moving their children to private schools if competent educationally centered leaders are not selected to run the LRSD. The discussion began focusing on the lack of knowledge of the present Superintendent in knowing the background of people in the present administration who are secretly pushing to be recommended as interim superintendent. These concerns originated from several patrons of Forest Park Elementary School as well as myself, who were asked to support the recommendation of Forest Park's former principal as interim superintendent or associate superintendent to the school board. Arma Hart. This past principal is For those of us who know Ms. Hart's self serving nature, we were outraged to know that she is being secretly considered for one of the top administrative positions. We became aware of this woman's manipulative techniques when she used some influential patrons to promote her personal agendas while disregarding the true education needs of our children. In various social settings she has reminded people of how the best qualified person was not chosen for the Desegregation Monitoring Office. She indicated how friendships and the desire to keep the power in certain circles kept her from being selected for the Desegregation Monitor's position. She has said the LRSD would definitely be forced to comply with the desegregation plan if a competent and qualified person was in charge, continues to unrelentlesSly push for power by supplying inaccurate information to uninformed people in strategic She positions that will promote her agendas. She pretends to support causes that these people believe in, in order to gain their confidence and support. Mrs. Hart has, again, seized the opportunity to take advantage of the disarray in the top administrative vacancies in the district to promote her own agenda of gaining power without regard for the needs of our children.  Mrs. Brown, there are people who have found Mrs. Hart difficult to work with and are fearful of this woman's unrelenting push for power to gain control. Even concerns have been voiced from certain Pulaski County administrators about remaining top administrators left in our district as possible candidates that they hope will not be placed as interim Superintendent, Mrs. Hart's name led the list. We are hoping that someone who was familiar with Mrs. Hart's professional background would listen and act upon this information before Mrs. Hart's name is recommended publicly. If her name is mentioned publicly, that obnoxious John Walker would find another means to discredit our district publicly with another discrimination accusation. This action would cause more disarray and more tax paying patrons may choose to leave our district. cc: Mr. Riggs Mrs. GeeRECE-' CONTINGENCY COMMITTEE REPORT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY 18, 1996 r ti'irid JUL 1  5 ' - - - d Office a Deaeflregasion Monitc\n. Rett Tucker and Roosevelt Brown, Co-chairmen Debbie Glasgow, Marian Lacey, Betty Mitchell, Skip Rutherford, John Walker Members of the School Board and citizens of Little Rock, my name is Rett Tucker and I am Co-chairman of the Contingency Committee approved by this Board earlier this year. Other members, who are present, include Co-chairman Dr. Roosevelt Brown, PTA Council President Debbie Glasgow, Mann Principal Marian Lacey, CTA President Betty Mitchell, fomier school board president Skip Rutherford and attorney John Walker. On behalf of Dr. Brown, let me begin by thanking the Board for putting your confidence and trust in us. We also want to thank thQ committee members for their dedication and hard work. We met numerous times in the spring and put together the framework of a contingency plan in the event it was needed. We have had almost perfect attendance at every meeting. We took this assignment very seriously. We considered it an honor and an opportunity to participate in this very important process. We resolved from the beginning that we would put our differences aside and work toward consensus. When we were notified Sunday that Dr. Williams was going to Kansas City, we were prepared. To finalize our recommendations, we have met every day this week and now come before you with a recommended plan of action. 1This plan comes to you with our unanimous support. In fact, I must say that our committee-with strong wills, strong personalities, strong views and all the diversity we prize in Little Rocknever once had a split vote and never met an issue that we didnt resolve in a civil and thoughtful way. I have been part of many committees both personally and professionally, but this one has represented the best and most gratifying experience Ive ever had. Lets clarify first what we did not do. Although there has been a great deal of speculation, we did not consider the selection of a permanent Superintendent. That was not our assignment. We do believe, however, that this is a very important decision in its own risht because it comes at such a critical time. We focused on the short-term, although we define short-term as one to two years. Tonight, we have two major recommendations. Our first deals with getting through the next several days and weeks. In this regard, we congratulate Dr. Williams on his new position and wish him well. We thank him for his leadership and his service. This is a tough job. We recognize that and appreciate all he has done. Although Dr. Williams will remain on the payroll until September 1, we know that he will be spending a great deal of his time, his talent and his energy-as he should-on Kansas City and the future. 2While he will still be a very valuable resource for this school district, we propose-from tomorrow through August 14, the formation of a five-person management team which would report directly to the Board. This team would operate in the same spirit that our Contingency Committee has operated: successfiilly addressing a short-term assignment. We spent a great deal of time and thought on the membership of this team. We looked for people with experience, with dedication and who had the energy to take on extra assignments. We recommend the following individuals: Dr. Victor Anderson would serve as the daily operations officer.' He bitings a wealth of experience as a principal, an administrator and, more importantly. as a person who is recognized as both a consensus builder and a team player. He would be in charge of day to day administration. Joining him on the team will be Sadie Mitchell, a former teacher, a former principal, and now an administrator, who has worked very closely with the elementary schools. Also, Jodie Carter, the principal of McClellan High School, who from first hand experience understands both the challenges and the opportunities of our senior high schools. Sadie will be in charge of all elementary schools and Jodie will have the responsibility for the senior high schools. The two other members come from our Contingency Committee. Let me add that neither sought a position on the team. In fact, both had to be drafted. 3Marian Lacey is the principal of Mann Junior High School. She is a principals principal and was such a positive voice on our committee. Marian knows the junior highs and her outstanding record at Mann speaks for itself. She will focus on all aspects of the junior high schools. Skip Rutherford, the only non-educator on the team, understands the school board better than most. He served on the Board from 1987 to 1991, as its president in 1989 and 1990 and coordinated two victorious millage campaigns. He will supervise communication and student assignments and will serve without pay. All of these members will continue to perform their current responsibilities. Marian Lacey will still be the principal at Mann and Jodie Carter will still be the principal at McClellan. Skip Rutherford will still work at Cranford Johnson Robinson Woods. Vic Anderson and Sadie Mitchell will still be district administrators. All of them, however, for the good of the district, will work on the management team which means extra duty and long hours for each of them. Please note that all four educators are or have been successful principals and the non-educator is a former school board member and president The team is experienced. It needs to be because much will be happening over the next four weeks-including the opening and beginning of school. We simply cant put this district on hold for that time period. This professional team addresses that issue. 4The second part of our recommendation relates to the position of Interim Superintendent. We considered many people and possibilities. We listened to board members and to interested citizens. We wanted to recommend someone who could provide effective, steady, experienced leadership\nsomeone with local tics who understands Little Rock, Arkansas and state school funding\nsomeone who could help this district and the Board in its search for a permanent Superintendent. We believe we have found that person. Tonight, we unanimously recommend to you. Dr. Don Robens-the former Director of the Arkansas Department of Education and the former Assistant Superintendent of the Little Rock School District.-Dr. Roberts is an Arkansas native and was educated at Henderson State and the University of Arkansas. He served as State Education Director during the administrations of both Governor Bill Clinton and Governor Erank White. He has been a successful Superintendent in three urban school districts. We recommend him to you as Interim Superintendent for a minimum of one year and a maximum of two. This will give you the time, the breathing room and the opportunity to find the best Superintendent possible. As we know from experience, finding a Superintendent is not always a quick process. Dr. Roberts can and will help you in the search. He is 61 years old and retired in 1994 after seven years as Superintendent of the Eort Worth School District. This is a district with 72,000 students and 9,000 employees. Since that time, he has been doing consulting work with school districts across the country. 5He loves Little Rock, loves Arkansas, knows Little Rock and knows Arkansas. We sought him out for this position. He has always been dedicated to high quality desegregated education and seeks to build cooperation across racial lines. He is known as a person who keeps his word and works in good faith. He is an educator, an administrator and, we believe, a healer. He did not seek the job. We went after him. Dr. Roberts can be here tomorrow to meet with you individually and as a group. He can be in Little Rock and on the job no later than Ausust 15. I We also recommend the following\nWhen Dr. Roberts arrives on August 15, the management team will become an advisory team to him. Dr. Roberts would, of course, take over the day to day operations, but we envision the advisory team helping him on both a regular and as-needed basis. Their assistance in this transition will be invaluable. As I noted earlier, we believe Dr. Roberts should be given a one- year contract with the possibility of another year if needed. He has indicated he is not interested in the full-time Superintendents position, but, again, that subject is a matter for the Board to discuss at the appropriate time. We believe his compensation package should be comparable to that of Dr. Williams. 6Dr. Roberts said it is extremely important to him that the citys leadership, the business community and other groups come together in support of the public schools. We've seen a sreat deal of that happening already and tonight we have with us Mayor Dailey, other elected officials, city leaders, school patrons, parents and interested citizens who are here in support of quality desegregated public education in our city. As chairman of the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce, I can pledge to Dr. Roberts, the board, and the management team, the Chambers continued support. The next two Chamber Chairmen, Doug Buford and Janet Jones, are here to back me up. Finally, and this is very important\nto provide tfiis district with stability as it works its way through some difficult problems and prepares for the 21st century, our colleague and fellow committee member John Walker, has agreed-in good faith-to a two-year moratorium on initiating any new legal action against the school district related to the settlement agreement. Dr. Roberts expressed reservations to our committee about accepting a position in a district embroiled in litigation and controversy. This offer was made by Mr. Walker to Dr. Roberts because of Dr. Roberts past record in the Little Rock School District and the State Department of Education. This means that the Board, Dr. Roberts and the employees in the District, for the first time in almost 40 years, can concentrate totally and fully on educating our children and on implementing and, if necessary, modifying the current desegregation plan and getting out of court. 7These are our recommendations. We believe they serve as a sound and reasonable short-term plan. We also believe they serve as a new beginning for the district and a bridge to the future. It is amazing what we can accomplish when we work together. Madame President and members of the Board, the Contingency Committee respectfully requests your approval of these recommendations. Havina discharaed our duties and responsibilities, we have concluded our assignment and will disband as a committee following tonights meeting. We thank you for this opportunity to serve our school district and our citv. Dr. Brown and I as well as members of the committee available to answer any questions you might haye. are now Thank you. C:\\wpwin6 l\\wpdocsUucker\\SupenntendeRL78 8@002 002 810 \\Sest Nlu-rkbiitn Stv I Ic Kock, .\"8'3 2.i '9\" 14:41 .ini ,324 202\n* I.RSD COM'li XrCATl fWM 602 004 'nBain4|aais^ fditKaUtU^ imOKn^ Little Kock School District .iJTTLE ROCK TO BEGIN SEARCH LOR PERMAuNENT SOPER INTET^ENT March 2.5. 19.97 boi Immediate Release tor more information Snellen Vann, 324-.2ri2(j The Littie Rock School District will begin its search for a permanent superhiteQaent m the next few weeks, according to Dr. Don Roberts, interim suoennteadent. who will assist the school board in the search process. \"Wtien I rerarned to Littie R.ock as interim superintendent in August, I pledged to help better position the district so that it could recruit ar, outstanding permanent superintendent and to assist in that recruiting effort.\" Dr. Roberts said. \"I am now centident Uttls ftoc.k can and will attract several quality applicants, and I will work very closely with the boai'd until the new' superintendent is on tlie job and is famihar with the .districts operation\n\"We knew Dr. Roberts would be here in a hill-time role for an interim rime,\" sai.d John PJggs. president of the school board 'But whai a terrific leader and eo.mmunicator he ha.s beer.\" i'liiore) 810 West Markham Street Little Kock. Arkansas 72201  (.50.1)32.4-2000   (W 97 4:42 .-lO) 324 2023 I.RSD COM'II \\ 1 CATf ODV Ei003 004 LR.SD Superintendent Search Rage 2 of 3 \"He has unified our boar d, strengthened our district and uplifted our community.\" Riggs said. \"He will now assist us in locating his pennanent successc\u0026gt;r and will continue to work With us on a consulung basis. In many ways, this may be the best of both worlds. Both Dr. Roberts and JRiggs said the riming was right to begin the search tor a permanent superintendent. If we wait any longer,\" Riggs said, \"the good candidates will be signing contracts elsewhere,'' \"We hope to have the new superintendent in place this summer so that ne or she will nave .several months as superintendent-designate to work with Dr. Roberts If Riggs adaed. \"It the search goes weii. a.s vze e.xpect, Dr. Roberts will step down as superintendent sometime before the end iif the year.\" Rett J ucker, immediate pant chakman ot the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce who co-chaired the district's contingency committee which recommended Dr. Roberts interim appointment, said, \"Ilie transidon is working exactly as we had hoped. Ur. Roberts has done a superb job, and I am grateful he will continue to help the Little Rock School District mov fonvard.\" Riggs said he has asked school board members Dr. Kaiherine Mitchell and Larry Beridey to wo: with Dr. Roberts in coordinating an.d recomn-iending the superintendent selection process. Riggs .-iaid he anticipated the district retainiiig a national search firm. (more) 0.3, 25 97 14-43 SC.l 324 2023 I RS!) f'iniMi \\rc4Ti ODM 1^004^ 004 LRSD Supeimnendent Searci? Hage J cif 3 L'nder Dr. Roberts leadership, the .Little .Rock School District was granted a nine molitli monncnum from federal court monitoring. The district, folio wing Dr. Roberts recomrr.endauon. has established school and community work team.s to m.3ke recoromeiidalions m the areas of student assigEment\neumculum, school revitalization\ndiscipline and alternative education\nleader.sh.ip and staff development, technology\nincentive schools and classroom-coramiinip.' links Dr. Roberts has committed to as ist foe district through rhe nine month process of recommending change.s in the district destgieganon pian to the coimt. \"While foere is always work to os 'lone and improvement to be made in education, Dr. Roberts saio, ['m ver\n- proud that the Little Rock Schoo) District continues to ourpertorm other urban dislricts and to set the pace in Arkansas when, it comes to National Merit and National Achievement Semifjnali.5ts as well as numerous other .academic and athletic competitions. Dr. Roberts sard he and his family would continue to 1 iI'e in the central Arkansas area and mat he would be available to the school district on an as-needed basis in the liiture.11 S\"'' T EY: 4- 7-9' : lb ISAM :.jA RiCGS LiTTLE RXK- -3013710100\n# 2/ 2 April 3, 1997 rMaiiic Addresji Cits. State .Zip \u0026gt; ht. Luue Rock Sciiool D.islrict Board of Directoi's is beginning the search for a new supermuinderu As pa/ t of the seiechon process, the Board is forming a C\n(izefis ' d'u.soiy foimmttee. T OU have lieen nonunated to serve as a member on the Citizens Advisory \u0026lt;. oi!Hnntee, The charge of Viis cominittee is to generate a list of qualifies and characteristics that the cominittee feels are essentia) for potential superintendent eandidates The work of the committee will be completed in one 3-bour meeting. i he comraitwc will meet Rom 6:00 p.rri. to 9\n00 p,n. on Tuesiiay, April 15*''' in (he i.V oai j Room of die .Administration Biuiding, 81.0 West Markham A lijrdat dinner Vv'.t! '\u0026gt;0 fved i 5 JO p.in Drvss Wi! be casual t he Board of Directors hopes you are w'iliing and able to pailicipate in this important meeting. Please caU-Swi^G*ifffir. at 32420 i2 to confimi your pdrt)Cip\u0026lt;U)on tAS soon as possible , i \\ -f i i'hanks lor yon oonynued support of oar public schools. Siiiccrely .ii.!bi! Riggs. iV, President ERS1..\u0026gt; Board of Directorsco nj 1T. 0 a !.iTTLE ROCKSCHOOI. DISTRICT Advisory Committee for Superintendents Search J Revised 4/9/97 April, 1997 o '9 NAME i ! Humphrey, .loa I .Innes, Doris Ui i j Joyce, Linda Hi^iinendy, Rarh Kiirrus, Baker GENDER Male Pcmalc Female Frraak Female I U) Q' j Massey, Don na I\nMuse, Itohn I i iatierson, Paula I Male Feniah Male ifACE y Klack While lllaek White While White Blaek OlwiANiZATION ALR - Vive Chanectior HoiKhwest Neighborhood Assoc -f I .Idhu Barrnw Neighbvrbnnd ! I Assoe, City Hoard Parent/Ccaeiier (arent/Aliiance New Party.laren t r. ' Smith, Benny .1 Female -----j. Whitt Black Male Black .New Party Parent [Pa renlZrarenfTforTubJic Schools i ( 'xr V-/a -r/Ij eer. AdvUoiy (.'omjuittce Superintendents' Search pauc 2 'l erQ, Andy T ISI 'AJ Cl J^^kcr, Diane Li' u. Malt Female Wilde i White Buford, Doug Tucker, Rett Williams, lluris \u0026lt;\u0026gt;*Mncy, Kevin Anthony. Leta ( harks. Dale Wd.svn. Do\nMoore, Delia T Male Male r, i Female ! Male Female Male Mak i Female White White Black ' White Kiack Black Blaek Black l i Nayies, Dorothy Female Block I hALR-Dcpt. 'if Fiaunre and Ecology I'strcnls for PuWk Schools I-R Charitbcr f^niberZAlliance FTA tjouneil Palx^nt ' leadership Riiitmitable _____developers ____^D^ted Way/Slrategie New Futures f Charlt 1 Male Black I ! liowen, Ver neH L Brock, 1'oni j_Fcniale White White Stephens Scbooi ____J Frm\u0026lt;^al-St^E(I^an Schooi Parent/ Geyer Springs First Baptist _____ .. 4_'Cf- Crj cf' Ct b? Advison- Cnmntittce Superintendents Search April, 1997 page 3 T T U' U'l ir PoreeH. Nolan ! Delon s f' ! Howard, Kiidnlnh -X j Marshall, Pam j Gibson. Don Rt-,, jVleRejio', a. Faeinta OUman, Flea nor Mitchcd, Bey p/aaWe Fee I ftregory, Brenda X\"i Co.idman-CiiaiidJer f /tdriene Male Female Male j ]'Van:i]k* Femafu Feniale Fcniak J Frniak __ j\nFeinjue _________[Mate Fetnak- ____j retr ! Female ! Whiiit Kiack Bfark Black j Black j Black Wck I Black ____\nWhite ___Black I Widu Bhirk Biack _ Grandparent i*TA/larkvie5v Principals fo)u,ii(tablc _____Mtdtown/yrKkJiw SchwiJ Ministcdal AJIiann \u0026lt; Airtra? High Srhcol Student \u0026lt;Tz\\ \u0026lt;1.1 GT7I __________J CTA I I 1 1 I ---------------------- 1 -------1 ) ____i j Fxec. Dir. I.K Housing /Parent Authorifj' ____I PareiiUjivfllyemcBt Crtiinatr Jtz Cl Advisiu-y C'nnupittee Superintendents Search April, 1997 page 4 Revised 4/9/97 j Ambrose, Ethel I PFemaic I'Whiu\" u\n Ood.sont Tommy Armstead, VIeki : Leopoufos, rhuddeus '^^loiiRson. Mozeila i HamiUnti, Wilijam (Uii!) i Nauiifn, Lon Eilic!  Marlin, Bitty R^'\u0026lt;*sevrt?, Dr. i Williams, SJacy CaratliRc, Btibra I ' Benjamin, Wieke, Dr cz_z Mak- Fem.Tile j Mak j i Female }  Mak I Femak Female Male pMalc I i I Kemak : Eeuhik I Black I Black 7\"'wi!)tn _\nBbek Biaik I Black TCoalition nl Little Rock j Ncithborhoods Tp^-nt^ightsvll Pritsident- LRaIXH* I SEwJcnVParkview Majiuet ' ' 'j Stephens S'cighlHirknnd Associalini^ j Prcshlenl  I I eaclier/Parkvicw Magnet f'*'* t Vicw/S(iff Station  Black j I I Blai-k h White ! White i Association^ l\u0026lt;esi\u0026lt;knt N/VACP .Arts \u0026amp; Htiinanities/Slrakgic 1 J 1 1 H i H ___J05 2i 97 11:10 Q50I 324 2023 I.kSD COM'irXICATI - . OOM Soo? 002 Little Rock School District Special Board Committee Meeting For Immediate Release May 21,1997 For more information: Snellen Vann, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors v,TJl meet as a committee at 4:30 p.rn. on Thursday, May 22, 1997. The Board will receive infi-irmaTinn from Hazard, Young, Attea \u0026amp; Associates, the firm which is assisting in the search to fill the supermtendents position. The meeting will be foEowed by the regular monthly Board meeting at 6:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. 7Tr^ 1 06 03. 97 10:17 501 324 2023 I.RSD COMMCMCATI -\u0026gt; ODM @002'002 Little Rock School District Special Board Meetings For Immediate Release June 3, 1997 For more information: Suellen Vann, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors will hold special meetings this week to conduct interviews with candidates for the position of superintendent. .Tne meetings are scheduled are: Tuesday, June 3, 1997 5:00 p.m. Board Room LRSD Administration Building 810 West Markham Wednesday, June 4, 1997 5:00 p.m. Board Room Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce 101 South Spring Street Thursday, June 5,1997 5:00 p.m. Board Room Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce 101 South Spring Street Friday, June 6, 1997 5:00 p.m. Board Room Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce 101 South Spring Street The meetings will be conducted in executive session. fj 11 jj }f ii n Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT St^.- RECEIVED JUN - 1997 RECEIVED June 5, 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORIMQ JUN 5 - 1997 OfflCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Little Rock School District Board of Directors is hosting three informal receptions to provide an opportunity for you to meet the three finalists for the position of superintendent of schools. These receptions are open to the public, but especially to members of the Advisory Committee for the Superintendents Search who developed the criteria for the selection process. The receptions will be held:  In the Administration Building Board Room 810 West Markham Street June 9, 11 and 13 (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday,)  5:00 - 6:00 p.m. \\Ne look forward to seeing you there! 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 824-2000 BJJuDI Fa'/: 1 ?d-2932 Jun 9 9^ \u0026gt; I P. 02/02 Little Rock School District Rtccptions for Superiatendent Candidates Rescheduled For liLmediate Release June \u0026lt;, 1997 For more infonnation. S'uellen Vann. 324-2020 Receptions tor the three finalists for the position, of supenntendent of the Little Rock Schcol fiJistrict (LRSD) have been postponed . i he revised schedule tor the candidate lecev-tions is' Wednesday, June 1 . 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. Kenneth James Thursday . Jtme 12, .S.OO - 6:00 p.m. Jimmy Scales Friday. June 13. 5\n()0  6-00 p.m. Leslie Carnine J he receptions will he neld in tne Board Room of the LRSD .Administration Budding. 810 West Markham. The public is invited to meet the finalists during this time. The monthly Board agenda meeting which was to be helo. on June 12 lias ocen piistponed tinti! Thuisday, Jvme 19. at 5'00 p.m. Sio West Markham Street Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 * (501)324-2000 LRSD SORT'S OFFICE 414 FOO TON :o \u0026lt; \u0026gt; ? s * J h- 1 I J s*\" ' : 1 Lhtle Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 12,1997 Mr. John Walker, Attorney 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: This is to advise that the finalists for the position of Superintendent of Schools were provided with a copy of the Desegregation Plan by Federal Express prior io their arrival in Little Rock. if we can provide additional information, piease advise. Sincerely, // Don R. Roberts Superintendent of Schools cc: John Riggs, iV 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 3iil-2000OR-^0 97 10:38 501 324 2023 I.RSD COM'irXTCATJ ()T)M 002/002 Little Kock School District Speciai Board Meeting For iramediate Retcase Jiuie I 1997 For more information\nSuellen Vann, .124-202{l dhe L ittle Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors wi ll hold a special meeting at 6\n00 p.m. Sunday, June 22, 1997. The special meeting wil.' be held to discuss cantiiiiates ..dr the position of superintendent. Ine meenngs will be held in the Administration Building, 810 West Markham. MEDIA NOTE\noir.ce this is a personnel issue, the Beard wil! conduct much of the meeting in executive .session. 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock. Arkansas 72201  ntc 4-2000 Little Rock School District Superintendents Since 1982 Ed Kelley June 1982 to July 1987 Van Jones July to October 1987 (interim) George Cannon October to November 1987 (interim) November 1987 to July 1989 Ruth Steele July 1989 to June 1992 Mac Bernd July 1992 to July 1993 Estelle Matthis July to October 1993 (interim) Hank Williams October 1993 to July 1996 Don Roberts August 1996 to August 1997 (interim) Leslie Carnine August 1997JOHN W. Walker, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JHN W. WALKER -ALPH WASHINGTON\naRK BURNETTE USTIN PORTER, JR. RECEIVED ^tc 1 5 1397 December 12, 1997 Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright United States District Judge OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LR-C-82-866 LRSD V PCSSD Dear Judge Wright: Enclosed please find the job postings by the Little Rock School District for four positions: Associate Superintendents for Desegregation, Support Services and Instruction and Director of Planning, Research and Development. I am writing to request that you allow the Office of Desegregation Monitoring to review and study the impact of the salary structure set forth in the postings, i.e. $70-90,000.00 plus car allowance and benefits with one position being open ended defined as negotiable. We have previously had extensive budget hearings. There is budget that allows payment of $100,000.00 or more including benefits to any group of employees. I believe that allowing the District to make these changes without court approval will have no tendency to have an adverse impact upon the ability of the District to meet, not only its desegregation obligations, but its other obligations as well. The effect will be magnified because the concept of equal pay will mean that scores of administrators may be able to make legitimate claims for upward pay adjustments. This will include principals and other persons at the Director level. a Dr. Leslie Carnine, the new superintendent, may not be aware of the budget concerns of the Court or the history of pay to administrators in the District. The Court is reminded that there has been no showing of a dearth of qualified applicants for administrative positions and thus, that huge payment is required to attract necessary staff. The salaries are grossly out of line for this district in comparison to other districts in the State except the possibility of the Pulaski County Special School District where we have raised similar concerns regarding pay inflation for administrators, many of whom are unnecessary. Dr. Carmine's principal advisor appears to be Mr. Brady Lexington Herald-Leader | 04/23/2003 | Let's hope James is as good as they say Page 1 of3 REAL Otm Click here to visit other RealCities sites New! Browse and Search Adt from The Herald-Lea ly fv.1 a\u0026lt;kc Great Grandparents Grandparents Your Parents  Who are your ancestor\nI \"YaurFamilv Name  '^i Seat V \u0026lt;:?!?: I I j' (:) r I iolS:DiLjK\\a^. I Our Local Channels + . News j Business j Sports j Entertainment v Living Search Back to Home \u0026gt; News \u0026gt; I Help I Contact Us I Site Index I Archives I Place an Ad I Newspape Wednesday, Apr 23, 2003 Shopping \u0026gt; Search the Archives News Breaking News Columnists Local Nation Obituaries Photos Politics Weather Weird News World Our Site Tools Weather Lexington Jackson, Breathitt County Louisville (Standiford) Local Events go + 54+34 + 51+38 + 58*38 Yellow Pages Discussion Boards Maps \u0026amp; Directions Subscribe to The Lexington Herald- Leader Have The Lexington Herald-Leader delivered to your home everyday  Subscribe today CATCH FREE LEGENDS Posted on Wed, Apr. 23, 2003 Local Find a Joi an Aparti a Home, Let's hope James is as good as they say By Cheryl Truman HERALD-LEADER COLUMNIST After a search most notable for what it didn't offer the public  an opportunity to meet the candidates  Fayette County's school board made the safest pick of the bunch: a middle-aged white male, fluent in the language of management-speak and team-building. You might have thought the board would have gone for candidate Joyce Bales, who is nationally recognized for narrowing the achievement gap. The board could have finally broken the race barrier in the superintendent's office with either of two other candidates. But it didn't. It picked an apparently nice guy with a clean record and an acquaintance with Kentucky Education Commissioner Gene Wilhoit. The board says Little Rock Superintendent Ken James is the best. We'll have to take board members' word for it, since nobody got to meet either James or the others, all but one of whom were identified by the newspaper. Board chair Kathy Lousignont said that Lexington citizens were ready to take the search \"to the next level\"  secrecy  which she contends was necessary to get the best candidate. Board member Angie Tedder opined that only the Herald-Leader was offended by the search being conducted behind closed doors. They're wrong. The public may cut the board a little slack about its search style as long as it delivers a genius superintendent who will deliver immediate, dramatic results that make everybody happy. But no superintendent is perfect, and the board has set up James to take a potentially dangerous fall. Come spring 2004, Lexington citizens may well doubt the board's judgment about James, and James may http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/local/5694508.htm V w. BKEAK Updated V 23, 2003  Mounta Named 11:53 Pr  Mounta Named 11:53 pr  Russia: MHtion I - 11:39  Malays! Rejects 11:33 Pr  U.N. In to Retui 11:12 pr 4/23/2003 Lexington Herald-Leader | 04/23/2003 | Let's hope James is as good as they say TICKETS Page 2 of 3 wonder why he left Little Rock. Enter to win 2 free tickets to any Lexington Legends home game.  Enter Legends contest % For the sake of the schools, I hope James is the best. And for the sake of that $195,000 a year he's getting, I hope his superiority and brilliance assert themselves within a few weeks of when he starts work. Because of the exclusionary way he was selected and the inflated salary he's making while the rest of the school system battles for pocket change, a performance that's only competent just won't cut it. Because if James takes a wrong step  if he cuts the wrong program, closes the wrong school, refuses to build the right school in the right place - the impact will be like walking into a propeller. And the school board, which is so immensely satisfied with itself just now, will take a public relations hit that will make the messy Robin Fankhauser resignation look like a garden party. Reach Chery! Truman at (859) 231-3202 or 1-800-950-6397 Ext. 3202, or ctruman @herald-!eader. com. RELATED LINKS  More School news  B email this | print this | license this | reprint this Re you by ui in 8i First N LastN State jChoo Email PHOTOS \u0026lt;  more pt FRi http://www.kentucky.coin/mld/kentucky/news/local/5694508.htm 4/23/2003 DATE: 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone\nFax\n(501) 447-1030 (501) 447-1161 5 [Z ^Iq3__________ TO: FROM: Suellen Vann, Director of Communications SUBJECT: Spe\u0026lt;^ I fy}ec'l^i MESSAGE: /he bJI Il k^[J) /b\u0026lt;f o r\u0026gt; 1 S j\u0026gt;oie cr(~ 4^ te C2T\u0026gt;n~^ g- 03 Cyy\\ S\n'Tly^ Pages (including cover) To Fax # An Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge 06/02/2003 16:55 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS (i: PAGE 01/01 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 For Immediate Release June 2, 2003 For more information\nTony Rose Board Vice President 569-8122 School Board Narrows Superintendent Candidate List The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District has narrowed the list of candidates for the position of Superintendent to six, according to Board Vice President Tony Rose. The six, in alphabetical order, are: Donald Carlisle - Miller Place, New York Jack Clemmons, - Lubbock, Texas Mary Guinn - Gary, Indiana Joan Kozlovsky - Pylesville, Maryland Stan Mims - New York, New York T. C. Wallace, Jr. - Macombe, Michigan During the next week, the Board will continue to gather information on the six candidates. Rose, who is leading the Superintendent search, said the Board will begin to arrange interviews next week, ### 06/12/2003 17:49 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/01 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 For Immediate Release June 12, 2003 For more information: Julie Davis, 447-1025 School Board Names Interim Superintendent The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District has named an Interim Superintendent of Schools. Dr. Donald M. Stewart was named to lead the district while the Board continues its search for a permanent replacement for Dr. T. Kenneth James who accepted the superintendent position in Lexington, Kentucky. Stewart has served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Little Rock School District for three and one-half years. Prior to that period, Stewart was Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs for the Pulaski County Special School District and for the North Little Rock School District. Stewart has worked for the Arkansag Department of Education and has served as Superintendent of Schools in Gentry, Arkansas and in Norfork, Arkansas. Stewart began his career as a fifth grade teacher in the Fort Smith Public Schools. He holds both the Arkansas Administrator Certificate and Teacher Certificate. In 1976, Stewart earned the Doctor of Education Degree from the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville. Additionally, he earned the Educational Specialist Degree and the Master of Education Degree from the University of Arkansas. He also holds the Bachelor of Science in Education Degree from Arkansas State University. ### Media Note\nDr. Stewart will be out of town on Friday, June 13\ntherefore, if you wish to interview Dr. Stewart, you may contact him the week of June 16 through his assistant at 447-1011. 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 For Immediate Release May 21, 2004 For more information\nSuellen Vann, 447-1030 School Board Sets Superintendent Candidate Interviews The Little Rock School District Board of Directors has selected five candidates to interview for the position of Superintendent of Schools. The itinerary for each candidate will be as follows: Public reception Interview with Board Dinner with Board 5:00 p.m, 6:00 p.m. Board Room, LRSD Administration Building SupeimJmdartsCcifaenceRDoni,LRSDAdiiiin.Bldg. FoUowinginlerview Undetermined location TourwithBoard member Nexlmcming Sites throughout the city The dates for the interviews will be June 1, 2, 3,4, and 7. The five candidates selected for interview for the position of Superintendent of Schools arc: Roy C. Benavides Roy Gregory Brooks Libby S. Gardner Stan Lamar Mims Jim V. Scales Odessa, Texas Sorrento, Florida Pflugerville, Texas Grayslake, Illinois Dallas, Texas The specific date when each candidate will be interviewed has not been finalized.06/01/2004 17:30 501-447-1161 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS RASE 01/01 -Rn -------- 1^/ /^r/ ISgf 310 ^^est Markh Little Rock, AR Direct Phone: m I (501) 447-1030 (501) 4474025 rwx XZ*' DATE: June 1, 2004 TO: Central Arkansas Media Cynthia Howell, Arkansas Democrat'Gazette FROM: Suellen Vann, Director of Communications SUBJECT: Special School Board Meeting MESSAGE: The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, June 8, at 5 p.m. The meeting will be held in response to a petition by Concerned Citizens United (CCU) requesting that the Board hold a special meeting for the purpose of discussing the appointment of Dr. Morris Holmes as the permanent Superintendent of Schools. Dr. Holmes currently serves as Interim Superintendent of Schools. In announcing the special meeting, School Board President Tony Rose said that the CCU will have 45 minutes in which to present to the Board, followed by seven minutes for each of the Board members to provide remarks. The meeting will be held in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. # Pages (including ccner) 1 To Fax # An Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge06/01/2004 11:05 501-447-1161 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE DATE: 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Direct Phone: Communications Office- (501) 447-1030 (501) 447-1025 TO: FROM: June 1, 2004 Central Arkansas Media Cynthia Howell, Arkansas Democrat-Gazeite Suellen Vann, Director of Communications SUBJECT: Press Conference MESSAGE: Tony Rose, president of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors, will hold a press conference at 3\n45 p.m. today to respond to the Concerned Citizens United petition for a special meeting of the Board. The press conference will be held in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. # Pages (including cover) 1 To Fax # An Individual Approacli to a World of Knowledge 1_I\\OV rwuc. 01/ Oi //V\" ___ West Markham 1^1 S Liftle R.ock, AR 722QI For Immediate Release June 2, 2004 For more infonnation: Qi iaT1o^ vuxix, /lUJV Superintendent Candidate Withdraws from Consideration Dr. Roy Benavides of Odessa, Texas has withdrawn his name from consideration for the position of Little Rock School District Superintendent of Schools. Therefore, the reception and interview scheduled with Dr. Benavides for Friday, June 4, have been cancelled. ftrrff06/11/2004 11:51 501-447-1161 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/01 810 West Markham Linle Rock, AR 72201 Direct Phone\nCommunications Office: (501) 447-1030 (501) 447-1025 DATE: June 11, 2004 TO: Central Arkansas Media Cynthia Howell, Arkansas DemGcrat-Gazetie FROM: Suellen Vann. Director of Communications SUBJECT: Special School Board Meeting MESSAGE: The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors Uld a special meeting th., Friday, Junt 11,, discus, candidate, for the position of Superir,tcndct of Schools. The meeting wiU begin at 5,00 p.m. in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 WeM Markham. * Pages (including cover) 1 To Fax # An Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge RECEIVED AUG 1 2000 OFRCEOF DESEGBEGATOOOfflTORiNG NARRATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT'S 1999-2000 PERFORMANCE GOALS July 2000 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Date: July 11. 2000 To\nMembers of the School Board Re\nNarrative Evaluation of the Superintendents 1999-2000 Performance Goals The 1999-2000 District Performance Priorities were an ambitious plan to provide foundational support for the changes that have been recently implemented in the Little Rock School District. Those changes are a direct result of the LRSD Strategic Plan and Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. Based on those two plans, of which the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan is an outgrowth of the Districts Strategic Plan, the District is on course to (1) have increased success rate for all students, and (2) be declared unitary by the Federal Court. We have established a priority to insure that a compliance plan for the Revised Desegregation and Education plan is in place and functioning. II. We are continuing efforts to provide technology and support its utilization by teachers and students. III. A cornerstone process of Campus Leadership is the Districts accountability plan that will become operable during the 1999- 2000 school year. IV. The Instructional Division has established a series of implementation goals to ensure the comprehensive standards- based system for the Little Rock School District. V. The operations component has established a variety of goals to support the overall mission of the District.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 2 Goal I. The Superintendent will provide facilitator and coordination support to achieve the goals as outlined in the District Performance Priorities for 1999-2000 school year. Evaluation: The Critical Performance Priorities report/evaluation, given to you under separate cover, was a very ambitious undertaking for the 1999-2000 school term. We are reminded that many of the goals are multi-year issues. However, we are very pleased with the progress that has been achieved. I salute the staff, particularly the lead individuals on each of the sub-goals, fortheir leadership. I was particularly pleased with the response that was generated by three special publications.  First, the first Annual Report to the Community in several years was produced and published as a newspaper supplement to the Arkansas Democrat - Gazette. The date of issue was September 1999.  Second, we developed a report on Plan Talk which was well received by the authors at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. The original report was controversial and the response / report by the District went a long way in establishing a professional basis for progress among the academic community. That report was completed in January 2000.  Finally, the compliance report to the community was produced and mailed to households in Little Rock in April 2000. The report was titled Good News from Good Schools and was an executive summary of the compliance report that was filed with the federal court in March 2000. The report, though not required, was complimented by all parties as a precursor to the report that is required to be filed in March 2001. We have noted to you that we are preparing the results or the impact of the Critical Performance Priorities. We have called this the Annual Report. In the near future this will become known as the District Report Card. Based on the trend analysis that we publicize on a quarterly basis, the District had a tremendous year in almost all categories. The report will be given to you under separate cover.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 3 Goal II. The Superintendent will provide necessary technical support and guidance for District Accountability to become operational during the 1999-2000 School year. Evaluation: A. Quality Initiative: The District obtained the first level and is working toward The Arkansas Quality Award. We have filed an application to move to the next level and a group of examiners will be here in late August to review the application and the progress of the District. Based on the change that has occurred, and the progress of the District in obtaining positive student results, we believe we will be moving to the next level. This is a comprehensive evaluation process and I have outlined generally the review areas. The following areas are reviewed: 1. Leadership a. Senior Leadership Direction b. Organizational Performance Review 2. Public Responsibility and Citizenship a. Responsibility to the Public b. Support of Key Communities 3. Strategic Planning a. Strategy Development Process b. Strategic Objectives c. Strategy deployment, action plan development \u0026amp; deployment 4. Customer and Market Focus a. Customer Relationships b. Customer Satisfaction Determination1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 4 5. Information and Analysis Analysis of Organizational Performance 6. Human Resource Focus a. Work Systems b. Employee Training and Development c. Employee Well-Being and Satisfaction 1. Work Environment 2. Employee Support Environment 7. Process Management a. Design Process b. Production and Delivery Process 8. Business Results a. Customer Focused Results b. Financial and Market Results c. Human Resource Results d. Supplier and Partnership Results Note: The District became the first school District in the State to be recognized for quality practices and we anticipate being recognized again for additional achievement in October 2000. B. Campus Leadership Handbook The Campus Leadership plan has already become a very important part of the Districts development. The utilization of the Campus Leadership Team as an important part of the development of the millage program gave the team credibility in a very real way.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 5 The participatory decision-making or site-based decision-making model that is being utilized will become stronger and more effective with time and training. As a reminder, we previously indicated that normal implementation of a site-based decision-making model is five years. This is the second year of implementation. The teams will play a very important role in their own restructuring and the implementation of technology and renovation plans for their particular facilities. The Leadership Handbook is an outline for achieving a quality school program with ample input and quality checks to ensure not only continuous improvement but also the bottom line of improved achievement for all children. (You have copies of the handbook and we are currently updating for distribution to principals and team members in July. The Cluster Coordinating Committees agreed on several edits and additions for the 2000- 2001-school term. c. Incentives and Sanctions (Campus Leadership Handbook pages 46-54 and Arkansas Comprehensive Testing. Assessment and Accountability Program pages 11 \u0026amp; 12) I have attached the section from the Campus Leadership Handbook for your information. I also recommend to you that the Incentive Plan that was approved by a 4-3 margin at the May regular meeting by the Board be reconsidered. It is vitally important that there be a super majority in consensus on the plan for Little Rock. There are two very important facets to accountability - - rewards and sanctions. Rewards and/or incentives are there for celebration and motivation. They must be based on a non-competitive plan, whereby you do not pit campus against campus. As I listened to the discussion, it was obvious that not enough time had been given for the Board to become familiar with the philosophy or why this plan is an important aspect of the accountability system for Little Rock. Essentially, it is part of a positive strategy for Little Rock to cope with the State Accountability Plan. What you saw was the initial phase and the other quality indicators will be added as the State Accountability Plan is implemented. We have emphasized the State Accountability Plan, but I also want you to know that we have coordinated this incentive plan with all of the other accountability features of the Districts Strategic Plan, the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, and a variety of federal initiatives such as IDEA /Title I. If you have reviewed the information in the Campus Leadership Handbook, you will note that the sanctions are tied to the State Plan. Hopefully, you will also note that the District is being much more proactive in providing1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 6 assistance and calling for change than is the State. As you know, the District has a significant number of schools with well below average student achievement. It is without a doubt the most important challenge this District will face over the next several years. Lack of progress would certainly negatively impact the strides the District has made over the last three years. Many, if not all, of the Critical Performance Priorities have been directed at making improvements in the core program, which translate into achievement improvements for all of the District students. What you should be able to discern is that the Accountability Plan which is being proposed by the state has been interwoven into the Campus Leadership strategy, of which the basic structure is in place in the District. There will be modifications and additions as the State Plan comes into being. Also, as has been previously stated, it is consistent with the Districts Strategic Plan and the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. Goal III. The Superintendent will provide the necessary leadership to continue the trend for: Evaluation: A. Improved academic performance We will be reporting areas that are familiar and in some instances new areas of assessment. 1. SAT 9 Growth Data: As previously reported to you, the growth rate for District students is similar to that of students nationally. The average percentile for District students is below the state and national averages. We do, however, have a number of students who do exceptionally well and, on the other hand, we have a significant percentage of students who score in the lowest quartile. As you see and review the results of K-2 Developmental Reading Assessment / No. 2, they are exceptionally promising and will have an impact on the SAT 9 averages in the near future. Based on previous improvement initiatives, you will see a change in that data during the A* and 5* years of the change process. We are currently in the 2\"'^ year of the emphasis on the core academics with ELLA and the new math programming.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 7 2. K-2 Developmental Reading Assessment: This may be the most important news the District has received in several years. The attached chart indicates strong growth in each of the primary grades. The chart also indicates the gap being reduced for the racial identities. The focus that has been achieved on staff development and monitoring is only at the 70% level and over the next couple of years we should approach 90% with the faculty. (Some may debate the percentages, but I am much more conservative on the effects of staff development within the first year of implementation.) It is very important for us to maintain the focus. Normally, it takes five years from this point to reach the average norm for accelerated achievement. As a final note, as you read the numbers it emphasizes even more that remediation is singularly the wrong concept. What we must be about is providing enrichment exercises that allow children to develop a vocabulary that is based on that enrichment. And finally, a reminder that we must stay the course and resist the temptation to modify or change programs. At least not for the next five years! 3. 4 Grade State Benchmark Assessment-ACTAAP: The District strategy has been to emphasize elementary / primary staff development and curriculum. The results, which were just noted to you in No. 2, are for the first full year under the new program. As I noted to you, we are not 100%... and as you review the data it suggests that real improvements have been made. We must caution however, that trends are not necessarily based on one year, but we can say it was a watershed event. Preliminary results from the District criterion assessment data suggest that we will have double-digit gains in the 4 grade ACTAAP / reading and mathematics. I have looked at several indicators that are normally very predictive and they all point to that result. If that becomes reality, it will be the first major positive academic event recorded since the-mid 198Os. We expect the official results to be here in early August. If you will remember, we expended significant effort installing the new Northwest Evaluation/Achievement level assessment program last year. All of us were concerned because even though there was tremendous involvement (numbers of teachers), it did push everyone close to overload. The process gives us a reliable and valid view of what is happening with the student. That level of predictability will provide the District with untold opportunities not only to fine tune instruction, but also to level up the curriculum as the improvement trend is established.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 8 4. Enrollment in Upper Division Classes, AP Enrollment and Successful Completion: Again, a success story like the Developmental Reading - - a watershed event. We had significant overall growth in numbers, but what was especially important was the number of African-Americans who not only enrolled, but who also were successful in the upper division classes. The total enrollment in AP Classes rose to 1,791 from 1,435 in the 1997-98 academic year, which translates to a 25% INCREASE. African American enrollment increased to 695 from 471 in the 1997-98 academic year, which translates to a 48% INCREASE. We do not necessarily predict that these numbers will continue to increase so dramatically\nit would be our assertion that they will plateau until the middle and elementary school programming produces an increase in numbers. What we do predict is that this will have a very positive effect on the college qualifying scores of the ACT and the SAT. There is an extremely high correlation between classes taken and scores on the ACT and SAT and success in post-secondary education. Please note that we had an additional 135 students in 8 sections of the UALR / Hall High University Studies program. We would note that 93% were successful and that African Americans made up 57% of the class participants. Since the Hall numbers could have been added to the college equivalency AP, the increase is even more spectacular. The total number of students participating in the college equivalency programs INCREASED 34% and African American student participation INCREASED 64%. We would also remind you that we had significant increases in upper division math and science classes, which parallel those college equivalency numbers. If you look at all upper division math and science classes we experienced a 20.6% INCREASE in students. 5. Enrollment in Algebra I \u0026amp; II and Biology: As you know, research has overwhelmingly confirmed that algebra has been described as a gatekeeper course because it has a high correlation with success in many of the other core academic programs. Algebra is required for high school graduation in Arkansas and the student will have to pass the new end-of-course benchmark test. There will also be an end of course biology test as part of the state accountability plan.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 9 What we do have is the number of students who move on to take Algebra II successfully. In 1997-98 there were 386 students and in 1999-2000 there were 533 or a 38% INCREASE. Biology is the twin of algebra as a gatekeeper and it, along with the new 9*\" grade physics program, will expand many more opportunities for students to complete a much more rigorous science curriculum. It should be noted that biology and Pre-AP biology had significant increases in enrollment. Biology INCREASED 29% over 1997-98 and the Pre-AP biology INCREASED 7%. 6. Duke University Talent Search Data: The Duke Talent Search Program is an important barometer for the academic student. As we work to improve the general education for all of our students, it is equally important not to forget the students who excel academically. In 1998-99 we had 12 students who were honored by the Duke Talent Search. This year we had 27 students who were chosen to participate in the state recognition ceremonies. The District had approximately 100 students who qualified to take the SAT or ACT in an effort to qualify for the State and National recognition. The initial qualifying standard for a student is to score at or above the 95*^ percentile on the SAT 9 or similar norm referenced test. As an additional thought, of which you may or may not be aware, there is a high predictive correlation on the number of National Merit Finalists which may be produced based on the Duke Talent Search identification program. We have had excellent numbers and it should be a stated objective to increase these numbers and especially to have additional minority students identified. B. Improved learning climate as shovi/n by: 1. Expulsion Data: The numbers continue to look good, if not great. As you know, we went from 119 to one last year, and this year three expulsions. But as you know, the three are currently enrolled in the Juvenile Justice Center and actually remain in an instructional program. We continue to think we will be able to maintain the low numbers in the future.1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 10 2. Reportable Offences: Suspensions The numbers continue to drop and that decline should continue. I will say that the Middle School initiative was an important ingredient in that decline. Numbers are important and, noting that, we had 6,247 suspensions in 1997-98, and dropped to 4,926 this year. What is more positive is that all the long-term suspensions are continuing their education at the Alternative Learning Center. Long term suspension numbers also have decreased by 29% since 1997-98. Secondly, we have also a decrease in the percentage of children who were engaged in negative behavior, from about 6% to slightly less than 2% of students receiving a reportable sanction. We are moving aggressively to develop more alternatives for special needs students and for middle school students. This effort will also drop these numbers significantly. What is the goal and what is the reasonable expectation? Slightly less than 1% appears reasonable for suspensions. What is vitally important is that these numbers not be a reflection of misbehavior not being addressed. We will be doing more numerous quality checks with staff and parents to maintain the credibility of the information. 3. Student ParticipationCo-curricular Activities: The area of student participation has been devastated by budgetary woes in the past. Research has been overwhelming regarding students who participate in the co-curricular areas of the arts and athletics - - they have fewer academic and citizenship problems. There are ways to increase participation, and we have been on a mission to improve the overall quality of the programming. I know you understand that learning climate issues are very complex and this is yet another way of creating a more positive learning climate. We do not have good numbers for fine arts participation, but an analysis of the class enrollments indicate a significant increase in interest. We must recognize that part of the change is due to the new middle school programming and the 9 grade move to the high schools. We have 8,077 students participating in a fine arts program. In some instances, much like athletics, a student may be participating in one to three activities or classes. Most students, however, are engaged in no more than two. As mentioned, we have the data on athletic participation for both boys and girls. As you would suspect, some of the increase of the past year would be because of our move to middle school. However, though it1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 11 does explain some of the gain, the analysis by grade indicates significantly more participation by both boys and girls. The only grade level that was somewhat flat, was the 12*^ grade, and we would expect that for athletics. The participant INCREASE was 43%, which is excellent. In 1997-98 we had 3,497 young people participating in secondary athletic activities. The number of participants INCREASED to 5,002 in 1999- 2000. We also saw the initiation of an activities advisory committee of parents, sponsors, and students. As has been previously stated, many of the activities are woefully under-funded and we all recognize we must solve some of the equity problems before we can fully realize the potential of co-curricular programs and activities. We believe that with the assistance of the activities advisory committee we can start to see positive improvement in the program over the next several years. We will be recommending a Director of Fine Arts be appointed. 4. Average Daily Attendance\nAn excellent barometer for learning climate is the attendance of students. We believe that attendance of teachers is also a major issue, but this particular item is specific to student attendance. Research has confirmed what most teachers already know - - those who miss a lot of school have lower academic achievement. There are a lot of reasons for non-attendance, but a primary reason is the lack of interest and the relevancy of instruction as perceived by the student. If you review successful schools research, it becomes quite obvious that their average daily attendance is also above average. You cant teach children who are not there. In 1997-98 the Districts percentage of attendance on a daily basis was 92.35%. In 1998-99 it had inched up to 92.44% which, though appearing small, was fairly significant because the number of days multiplied by the number of students is very significant. However, we are pleased to report that we INCREASED to 94.09% in 1999-2000. The goal is to be at 96%, which appears reasonable, but will still be very difficult to achieve. This is another indicator that the learning climate is becoming more normal. 5. Parent support and involvement: The model which the District is utilizing makes community / parental support a major component. If you will remember, there are six components to the model, and the involvement factor is a key ingredient to quality schools and improved student achievement. As1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 12 we entered the school year the strategy employed was to increase the amount of involvement in the following ways: a. Include parents and community members on the campus leadership teams and as a part of the school decision-making model. As previously noted, they played a key role in creating the basis for the millage campaign. In the future they will have a much larger role in the school improvement process. b. The second strategy employed was to capitalize on the vitality of the VIPS and PIE programs by increasing the amount of volunteer and mentoring time at the individual schools. Debbie Milam and the advisory board have been key to increasing the activities which bring the public into the schools. Note the increase in the community volunteer hours in the schools. The numbers have increased from 187,881 hours in 1997-98 to 255,937 in 1999-2000. This is a 36% INCREASE in community volunteer hours. c. The third strategy was to increase the involvement and participation of the PTA. The membership growth and revitalization of a number of the campus units has created a new level of excitement and participation at the school level. It was very exciting to see the State PTA recognize Little Rock in almost every category for exemplary performance. The District received 38% of all awards at the State Level. Membership INCREASED by 36% and we are establishing a goal to pass 20,000 members for 2000-2001. d. The fourth strategy was to develop a new organizational structure for parental participation and involvement. Bonnie Lesley has done an excellent job of bringing together the various groups and this new plan creates the possibility of substantive growth in involvement. As a side note, the prevailing research recognizes that teachers are the most satisfied where parent participation and support are strong. And without belaboring the point, student achievement is also maximized by that same participation and support. 6. Reduction in the dropout rate: This priority is a major quality issue. As you know, the District experienced a higher than average dropout rate for a significant number of years. In 1997, the District started the ACC Program at Metropolitan to assist with the non-traditional student who was in1999-2000 Performance Goals July 2000 Page 13 danger of dropping out The average number served in 1997 was 100. In 1998, the program was expanded and the evening high school program was consolidated with the ACC Program. The average number served rose to 200. In 1999, the program was expanded again at Metropolitan and a site-based program utilizing PLATO software was initiated at all high schools except Parkview, which is a traditional magnet high school. The average number served again increased, to approximately 400. We anticipate that the program will continue to expand in the year 2000 with the option of serving overaged sophomores. Currently, the program at Metro is open to students needing to make up credits who are either 11* or 12*^ grade in age. Evaluation: In 1997-98, the reported dropout rate was 8.7%, or 926 students who left school. That rate is equivalent to slightly less than 40% who started O* grade, but did not finish. The figure improved to 6.8% in 1998-99 with the utilization of the alternative programs mentioned above or 689 students. The estimate for 1999-2000 is 4.46% or 550 students, which is a considerable improvement. Since the final rate is not established until school has started, it may drop to the 4% level primarily by returning students. We will make a push to recover several of these students. The goal for 2000-2001 is to be in the 3.4% range, or less than 400 students. As a final note, the drop out improvement is estimated to have generated $1,7 million in state monies. The dollars generated easily pay for the operation of the ACC and ALC. We have placed two alternative programs on probation for the coming year. Both have suffered from small enrollments and the challenge will be to increase their enrollment and the student achievement levels. We are recommending that this be a critical performance priority.APPENDIX I GOAL I : Critical Performance Priorities End of Year Report 1999-2000 Provided under separate cover.APPENDIX II GOAL II : Campus Leadership Handbook Pages: 1. 46-54 2. 11-12I I 1 I i Rewards for Schools The District shall develop a system to reward (a) Quality Schools - schools absolutely meeting all the performance indicators established by the Arkansas Department of Education and (b) Improving Schools - schools demonstrating improvement, meeting a preponderance of the trend and/or improvement goals established by the Arkansas Department of Education and LRSD. The following points are established for each indicator. They will be added to determine a schools total score. 0 1 2 3 Declined in performance from previous year or semester Maintained last years performance and/or improved but did not meet trend/improvement goal Met trend/improvement goal Exceeded trend/improvement goal A definition ofpreponderance and the number of minimum points required for rewards will be established. Quality Schools and Improving Schools Quality Schools and Improving Schools may be recognized and rewarded in the following ways, as determined by the Superintendent: 3. A presentation will be made to the Board of Education on the schools achievements involving both staff and parents, a press release commending the schools performance will be issued, and schools will be featured in District publications, on cable television, and on the web page. b. The school may be designated as a mentor school and granted resources to provide technical assistance and support to another school in the District identified for improvement. { 3 s c. As appropriate, the District will support a schools application for state and national recognition in the national Blue Ribbon School program. d. The District will collaborate with the community to identify other possible recognitions of the schools progress and achievement. e. Schools will receive a grant to encourage and facilitate further improvement. The amount of the grant will be determined by annual budget appropriations. Awarded funds will be used for innovative programs, to provide additional materials and supplies, to support technology enhancements, to improve meaningful parent involvement, and/or for professional development of the staff. f. Each school will receive a banner/flag that celebrates its success. 5Rewards for Staff and Students Each Quality and each Improving School is encouraged to design, in collaboration with parents and the community, celebrations of success and recognition for contributing teachers, teacher teams, other staff, and parent/community volunteers, as well as students who meet the performance goals. Sanctions According to ADE and the State Board of Education, sanctions in the ACTAAP system are applied for the purpose of improving teaching and learning, not for punishing schools or the people in them. The LRSD supports this view. Each Arkansas school is expected to achieve annually a minimum percentage of its total possible points assigned for the performance indicators in the ACTAAP system for accountability. Failure to do so will result in the following designations, as determined by the Arkansas Department of Education: First year: Second year: Third year: Fourth year: Fifth year: Sixth year: High Priority Status Alert Status Low Performing Status Academic Distress Phase I Status Academic Distress Phase II Status Academic Distress Phase III Status To be eligible for removal of any sanction designation, leading up to, but not including. Academic Distress Phase I, a school must attain the minimum percentage of its total possible points for two consecutive years.  Once classified as Academic Distress Phase I, a school must comply with the rules and regulations to be promulgated by the ADE in order to be removed from this category. Failure to do so will result in the designation of Academic Distress Phase II, and so forth. The District will not identify schools for sanctions. Rather, the District will ensure the following levels of technical assistance and/or corrective actions for schools identified for improvement by the Arkansas Department of Education. In other words, the District will form a partnership with each school in need of improvement and will assist and support that school in its improvement efforts. To that end, the District has reorganized staff in the Division of Instruction to form a multidisciplinary School Improvement department. A common mission for all Division of Instruction teams will be to help schools help students achieve the challenging standards established by the Arkansas Department of Education and the LRSD and as measured by the various performance, trend, and improvement indicators. The assignment of a Broker for each school is another level of support. 47 I ii I ) The following technical assistance and support services are established for schools requiring improvements\nTechnical Assistance and Support for Schools Identified for Improvement Year/Status/ Definition LRSD Assistance/Support Assigned Responsibility YEAR ONE: WARNED The first year that an LRSD school fails to meet its performance, trend, and/or improvement goals. The Superintendent will ensure that staff are designated to: 1. Inform the principal, the central office broker, the Campus Leadership Team, the Cabinet, and the Board of Education of the designation of the school and its implications. Testing and Program Evaluation Team 2. Provide appropriate levels of technical assistance to the school as it develops and implements its School Improvement Plan so that it addresses specific elements of student performance problems and includes waivers of any policies or regulations that impede the ability of the school to education its students. Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team 3. Conduct a School Improvement Audit to determine the extent to which the Campus Leadership Plan is being implemented at the school. Technical Assistance Team 4. Require the recommendations from the School Improvement Audit to be addressed in the following year's School Improvement Plan, if not possible to do so immediately. 5. Monitor regularly and conduct formative evaluations of the implementation of the School Improvement Plan, reviewing with the principal and the Campus Leadership Team formative data and making suggestions for modifications and adjustments to the implementation plan. 6. Provide the principal, the broker, members of the Campus Leadership Team, and other appropriate staff opportunities to participate in professional development activities that should lead to school improvement. i I i Associate Superintendent for School Services Associate Superintendent for School Services Professional Development Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team\nAssociate Superintendent for School Services 48I YearZStatusZ Definition LRSD AssistanceZSupport Assigned Responsibility YEAR TWO: HIGH PRIORITY STATUS The Superintendent will ensure that staff are designated to: A school identified by ADE that for two consecutive years fails to meet the performance, trend, and/or improvement goals. 1. Inform the principal, the central office broker, the Campus Leadership Team, the Cabinet, and the Board of Education of the designation of the school and its implications. 2. Provide appropriate levels of technical assistance to the school as it develops and implements its School Improvement Plan so that it addresses specific elements of student performance problems and includes waives of any policies or regulations that impede the ability of the school to educate its students. 3. Conduct a comprehensive Curriculum Audit to determine the extent to which the school is implementing the District curriculum and the quality of its interventions for students not meeting the standards. 4. Require that the recommendations from the Curriculum Audit be addressed in the following years School Improvement Plan, if impossible to do so immediately. Possibly mandate the implementation of specific actions, professional development, or programs to address needs identified in the Curriculum Audit and/or the analysis of disaggregated student performance data. 5. The District shall take corrective action during the High Priority Status Year through one or more of the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) Decrease the decision-making authority of the Campus Leadership Team. (b) Require participation in remedial training or professional development, and then implementating the necessary changes. Reflect the school's low performance in the evaluation of the principal, as well as teachers and other staff who contributed to the low performance of the school. Replace the school principal. Testing and Program Evaluation Team Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team Curriculum/ Instruction Team\nPlanning and Development Team Associate Superintendent for School Services Associate Superintendent for School Services 49 i3 Year/Status/ Definition LRSD Assistance/Support Assigned Responsibility :i Year Three: Alert Status The Superintendent will ensure that staff are designated to: s I i t 1 J \u0026gt;{ - .3 A school identified by ADE that for three consecutive years fails to meet the performance, trend, and/or improvement goals. 1. 2. 3. Inform the principal, the Campus Leadership Team, the Cabinet, and the Board of Education of the designation and its implications. Conduct follow-up or monitoring of implementation of School Improvement and Curriculum Audit recommendations. Mandate appropriate specific actions, professional . development, and/or programs to address student needs. 4. Continue to provide appropriate technical assistance as the school develops and implements its School Improvement Plan. 5. The District shall take corrective action during the Alert Status Year through one or more of the following: (a) Decrease the decision-making authority of the Campus Leadership Team\n(b) Require participation in remedial training or professional development and then implementing the necessary changes\n(c) (Reflect the schools low performance in the evaluation of the principal, as well as teachers and other staff who contributed to the low performance of the school. (d) Reconstitute the school staff by replacing the principal and up to 50 percent of the teachers and other staff, as appropriate. Testing and Program Evaluation Team Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team Associate Superintendent for School Services Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team Associate Superintendent for School Services 50Year/Status/ Definition LRSD Assistance/Support Assigned Responsibility Year Four: Low Performing Status A school identified by ADE that for four consecutive years fails to meet its performance, trend, and/or improvement goals. The Superintendent will ensure that staff are designated to apply one or more of the following sanctions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Revoke the authority of the school to design its School Improvement Plan. Require participation in remedial training or professional development and then implementing the necessary changes. Reflect the low performance of the school in the performance evaluations of responsible staff, including the principal, as well as teachers and other staff who contributed to the low performance. Conduct follow-up audits to determine the extent to which the school has effectively implemented the recommendations of the School Improvement Audit and the Curriculum Audit conducted in years one and two. Reconstitute the school staff by replacing the principal and up to 50 percent of the teachers and other staff, as appropriate. Associate Superintendent for School Services Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team Associate Superintendent for School Services 51Year/Status/ Definition LRSD Assistance/Support Assigned Responsibility YEAR FIVE: ACADEMIC DISTRESS PHASE I STATUS The Superintendent will ensure that staff are designated to apply one or more of the following sanctions: A school identified by ADE that for five consecutive years fails to meet its performance, trend, and/or improvement goals. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Revoke the authority of the school to design its School Improvement Plan. Require participation in remedial training or professional development and then implementing the necessary changes. Reflect the low performance of the school in the performance evaluations of responsible staff, including the principal, as well as teachers and other staff who contributed to the low performance. Conduct follow-up audits to determine the extent to which the school has effectively implemented the recommendations of the School Improvement Audit and the Curriculum Audit conducted in years one and two. Reconstitute the school staff by replacing the principal and up to 50 percent of the teachers and other staff, as appropriate. Sanctions for Central Office Associate Superintendent for School Services Technical Assistance Team\nCurriculum/ Instruction Team Associate Superintendent for School Services Effective Year Two, upon the Superintendents recommendation, the performance evaluations of central office staff designated to provide leadership in human resources, teaching and learning, school improvement, school services, administrative services, and technology, including members of the Superintendents Cabinet, shall also reflect the schools low performance if it can be determined that they shared responsibility, through their decisions or actions, or lack thereof, for the low achievement of schools identified for sanctions. Sanctions for the Superintendent will be determined by the Board of Education. 52School Role When Identified for Sanctions Each school identified for sanctions shall\na. b. c. d. e. f. In consultation with central staff and the Campus Leadership Team develop or revise a School Improvement Plan in ways that have the greatest likelihood of improving the performance of all children in meeting the expected improvement goals outlined in ACTAAP and the Quality Index. Align all the schools systems and resources behind the effective implementation of the plan. Submit the plan in a timely manner to school and District-level staff for review, feedback, and approval. Implement the plan, conducting self-monitoring on a frequent basis to determine success and then making appropriate adjustments. Consult frequently with District-level staff assigned to support the school and to provide technical assistance. Improve the skills of its staff by providing effective professional development activities. At least ten percent of the Title 1 funds (if received) shall be committed over a two-year period to professional development\nor the school must otherwise demonstrate that it is effectively carrying out professional development activities from other funding sources. Decisions about how to use the professional development funds shall be made by teachers, principals, and other school staff in that school during the first year a school is identified for sanctions. Definitions School Improvement Audit^This audit will include a review of the meeting minutes of the Campus Leadership Team, the participation level of CLT members, quality of the School Improvement Plan, use of disaggregated data for decision-making, action research projects underway, sense of collective responsibility, quality of professional development, etc. If the school receives Title 1 funds, the audit will include determinations of the extent to which the school is in compliance with federal regulations and expectations. The audit team will be composed of staff from both the central office and campus levels. A written report will be compiled by the audit team and then approved by the Assistant Superintendent for School Improvement and the Associate Superintendent for School Services. It shall be provided orally and in writing to the Assistant Superintendent for School Services, the principal, the broker, and the Campus Leadership Team. Copies will be provided to the Superintendent, the Cabinet, and other appropriate central office staff who need to be involved in the school's improvement efforts. 53J Curriculum AuditThe comprehensive curriculum audit will include a review of the schools master schedule, its curriculum maps, its ACSIP plans and processes, observations of classrooms, the extent to which the District curriculum is being implemented, the professional development experiences of the staff, the quality and use of instructional materials, learning climate, academic guidance, etc. The audit will include interviews with most staff and representative numbers of students and parents. The curriculum audit team will be composed of both central office and campus-level staff. A written report will be compiled by the audit team, approved by the Associate Superintendent for Teaching and Learning and provided orally and in writing to the Associate Superintendent for School Services, the Assistant Superintendent for School Services, the principal, the broker, and the Campus Leadership Team. Copies will be provided to the Superintendent, the Cabinet, and other appropriate central office staff who need to be involved in the schools improvement efforts. 6 I  2 54Campus Leadership Team Calendar The calendar is approximate of the activities that you consider as you work together to create a more effective school. The asterisk (*) denotes where a form or additional information exists to accomplish the task or confirm the activity. January Campus Leadership Team has initial meeting* a. b. c. d. Introduction to the process orientation activities for new members team expectations planning process reviewed Review and interim evaluation of campus plan activities. Consideration of modification to current year campus plan and submit to designated individual for review. Discuss plans for update of needs assessment. February Campus Leadership Teams work with developing skills in problem solving and consensus building, conflict resolution and communication. Request specific type of technical assistance. March Monitor and adjust campus plan  Draft action plan due to Assistant Superintendent Begin process of working with the campus community to address perceived needs of campus for following year April Discuss and start evaluation of Campus Leadership Teams problem solving process and team effectiveness. Start Evaluation of current year campus plan and establish timelines for completion of evaluation and communication with stakeholders. Create strategy and set in motion the collection of published research and data collection requirements for discussion and analysis by Campus Leadership Team in preparation for next years campus plan. May Evaluate assessment results Campus Leadership develops and communicates draft of focus areas based on assessment results. 11June July August September October November December Submit evaluation of campus plan (There is a recognition that current year results of ACT / SAT would not be available or certain other current year results. The incentive plan will indicate those particular areas and that the previous years results will be utilized in those cases.) District-wide Campus Leadership Team Meetings Campus Leadership Team refines initial draft of campus goals and further starts development of action plans on determined focus areas. District wide Campus Leadership Team Meetings by Cluster Opening of School Campus Leadership Team meetings with faculty on Campus. Share recommend goals for current year and draft of action plans. Confirm goals. Designate problem solving and action teams for accomplishment of goals Communication with all stakeholders the goals of the campus*. Prepare final action plans and submit to Superintendent and Board for final approval. Acceptance or modification required goals and action plans. Hold public meeting and share results of previous years campus goals and action plans Inform public and staff of opportunities to serve on the Campus Leadership Teamshare Leadership Team membership expectations. Receive nominations for membership on the Campus Leadership Team for each membership category*. Current Leadership Team checks on implementation of action plans. Problem solving teams Election of Leadership Team members* Collection of data to ascertain effectiveness of action plans and problem solving teams Initiate mid year report of progress * Appointment of members to the Leadership Team* 12APPENDIX III GOAL III : K-2 Developmental Reading AssessmentK-2 Developmental Reading Assessment Scores, 1999-2000 2 = Proficient LRSD Average = 4.43 16 = Proficient LRSD Average = 19.06 24 = Proficient LRSD Average = 30.18 Kindergarten Badgett_____ Wakefield Garland Baseline Chicot Cloverdale Woodruff Franklin Watson Romine Wilson Mabelvale Geyer Springs Mitchell Bale Western Hills Fair Park Brady_______ King________ Rockefeller Meadowcliff Booker Otter Creek Rightsell_____ Forest Park Washington McDermott Williams Dodd Pulaski H. Gibbs Terry________ Carver Fulbright Jefferson 1.26 1.29 1.40 1.84 1.99 2.10 2.10 2.30 2.30 2.91 3.06 3.09 3.11 3.33 3.57 3.68 3.75 3.84 3.90 4.30 4.37 4.53 4.77 4.92 4.98 5.63 5.85 5.96 6.39 6.41 6.46 7.71 7.91 9.70 9.89 Grade 1 Badgett_____ Garland Chicot Wakefield Cloverdale Watson Mitchell Brady Rightsell Baseline Washington Pulaski H. Romine Terry_______ Geyer Springs Meadowcliff Dodd Mabelvale King_______ Booker Gibbs Bale Wilson Fulbright Otter Creek Rockefeller Franklin Western Hills Carver Fair Park McDermott Woodruff Forest Park Jefferson Williams 6.29 10.79 11.28 11.38 12.20 12.40 12.42 13.52 14.00 14.18 17.08 17.09 17.44 17.65 18.54 20.05 20.14 20.24 20.42 20.72 20.79 21.33 21.89 21.98 22.05 22.07 22.21 22.44 22.72 22.73 23.81 24.08 25.70 25.90 30.12 Grade 2 Badgett Garland Wakefield Dodd Chicot Meadowcliff Mabelvale Mitchell Baseline Watson Pulaski H. Wilson Washington Brady______ Bale Cloverdale Fair Park Rockefeller Geyer Springs Gibbs_______ McDermott Woodruff Otter Creek Booker_____ Terry_______ Jefferson Forest Park Franklin_____ Romine_____ Carver______ King________ Williams Rightsell Western Hills Fulbright 8.14 18.50 20.24 22.78 23.35 23.56 24.67 24.71 24.94 26.30 26.55 26.57 27.56 27.55 28.30 28.36 28.97 29.02 29.79 30.70 31.00 32.60 32.86 32.92 33.00 33.20 34.09 34.13 34.18 34.71 36.39 38.13 38.16 38.97 39.1506/09/2003 09:00 501-324-2023 _^LRSD COMMUNICATIONS\n! /LZZy 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Direct Phone: Communications Office: (501) 447'1030 (501) 447-1025 ^Ot DATE: June 9, 2003 TO: Central Arkansas Media Cynthia Howell, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette FROM: Suellen Vann, Director of Communications SUBJECT: Special School Board Meeting MESSAGE: The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors will hold a special meeting Monday, June 9, to consider candidates for the position of Superintendent of Schools. The meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. # Pages (including cover) 1 To Fax # An Individual Approach to a World of KnowledgeI\n'?! \\\\ 810 West Markham Little R^ock, AR 72201 For Immediate Release May 26, 2004 For more information: Suellen Vann, 447-1030 School Board Finalizes Superintendent Candidate Interviews The Little Rock School District Board of Directors has selected five candidates to interview for the position of Superintendent of Schools. The itinerary for each candidate will be as follows: Public reception Interview with Board Dinner with Board 5:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Board Room, LRSD Administration Buildmg Supeintendasts ConfasneeRoom, LRSD Admin. B Idg. Following interview Undetermined location Tour with Boaiu member Nectmoming Sites teou^ut the city The dates for the interviews will be June 1-7. The five candidates selected for interview for the position of Superintendent of Schools are: June 1 June 2 Roy Gregoiy Brooks Jim V, Scales June 3 June 4 June 7 Libby S. Gardner Roy C. Benavides Stan Lamar Mims Sorrento, Florida Dallas, Texas Pflugerville, Texas Odessa, Texas Grayslake, Illinois fffj ft ftfi ff\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":76,"next_page":77,"prev_page":75,"total_pages":366,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":900,"total_count":4389,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"worksheets","hits":2},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":4127},{"value":"StillImage","hits":387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":246},{"value":"Federal Bureau of Investigation","hits":186},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":112},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":106},{"value":"Scholarship, Education and Defense Fund for Racial Equality","hits":75},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":66},{"value":"United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation","hits":57},{"value":"Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","hits":52},{"value":"Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party","hits":50},{"value":"Huckaby, Elizabeth","hits":41}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":824},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":615},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":575},{"value":"Birmingham (Ala.)--Officials and employees--Biography","hits":567},{"value":"Birmingham (Ala.)--Politics and government--20th century","hits":567},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Alabama--Birmingham","hits":567},{"value":"Politicians--Alabama--Birmingham","hits":567},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":507},{"value":"African Americans--Arkansas","hits":455},{"value":"Civil rights--Arkansas","hits":454},{"value":"Race discrimination--Arkansas","hits":454}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":259},{"value":"Huckaby, Elizabeth","hits":89},{"value":"Simpson, John Milton Bryan, 1903-1987","hits":89},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":79},{"value":"Davis, L. O.","hits":78},{"value":"Hayling, Robert Bagner","hits":74},{"value":"Bryant, Farris, 1914-2002","hits":52},{"value":"Phillips, Vel, 1924-2018","hits":42},{"value":"Stuart, Virgil","hits":39},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":35}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":566},{"value":"Simpson, John Milton Bryan, 1903-1987","hits":89},{"value":"Davis, L. O.","hits":78},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":77},{"value":"Hayling, Robert Bagner","hits":74},{"value":"Bryant, Farris, 1914-2002","hits":52},{"value":"Phillips, Vel, 1924-2018","hits":42},{"value":"Stuart, Virgil","hits":39},{"value":"Ashmore, Harry S.","hits":34},{"value":"Brown, Robert R. (Robert Raymond), 1910-1994","hits":30},{"value":"Heiskell, John Netherland, 1872-1972","hits":30}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":246},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":167},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":77},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":7},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":5},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":3},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":2},{"value":"Integration of Clemson University","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1644},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1603},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1212},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1145},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Jefferson County, Birmingham, 33.52066, -86.80249","hits":567},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":439},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":409},{"value":"United States, Florida, 28.75054, -82.5001","hits":373},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Dunbar High School, 34.73231, -92.28654","hits":206},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Central High School, 34.73683, -92.29895","hits":189},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, Forrest County, Hattiesburg, 31.32712, -89.29034","hits":86}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1727},{"value":"Alabama","hits":573},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":569},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":503},{"value":"Florida","hits":410},{"value":"Wisconsin","hits":84},{"value":"Georgia","hits":74},{"value":"New York","hits":42},{"value":"Missouri","hits":17},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":9},{"value":"Virginia","hits":9}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1964","hits":955},{"value":"1963","hits":662},{"value":"1965","hits":511},{"value":"1962","hits":470},{"value":"1957","hits":460},{"value":"1960","hits":454},{"value":"1966","hits":442},{"value":"1961","hits":439},{"value":"1967","hits":438},{"value":"1995","hits":428},{"value":"1959","hits":418},{"value":"1994","hits":409},{"value":"1958","hits":399},{"value":"1996","hits":398},{"value":"1993","hits":384},{"value":"1969","hits":381},{"value":"1968","hits":357},{"value":"1991","hits":357},{"value":"1992","hits":357},{"value":"1997","hits":346},{"value":"1999","hits":346},{"value":"2000","hits":332},{"value":"1998","hits":330},{"value":"2001","hits":324},{"value":"1970","hits":317},{"value":"1990","hits":309},{"value":"1971","hits":293},{"value":"2002","hits":293},{"value":"2003","hits":280},{"value":"1956","hits":276},{"value":"1989","hits":276},{"value":"1972","hits":266},{"value":"2004","hits":260},{"value":"1955","hits":257},{"value":"2005","hits":235},{"value":"1954","hits":228},{"value":"1981","hits":224},{"value":"1974","hits":219},{"value":"1987","hits":214},{"value":"1988","hits":213},{"value":"1975","hits":203},{"value":"1984","hits":202},{"value":"1973","hits":201},{"value":"1986","hits":201},{"value":"1985","hits":200},{"value":"2006","hits":199},{"value":"1982","hits":196},{"value":"1983","hits":196},{"value":"1977","hits":195},{"value":"1980","hits":195},{"value":"1979","hits":193},{"value":"1976","hits":187},{"value":"1978","hits":187},{"value":"2007","hits":187},{"value":"1952","hits":156},{"value":"2010","hits":155},{"value":"1951","hits":154},{"value":"1953","hits":154},{"value":"2009","hits":152},{"value":"2008","hits":151},{"value":"2011","hits":151},{"value":"1950","hits":146},{"value":"2012","hits":142},{"value":"1948","hits":140},{"value":"2013","hits":140},{"value":"2014","hits":139},{"value":"1947","hits":137},{"value":"1945","hits":135},{"value":"1944","hits":133},{"value":"1946","hits":132},{"value":"1949","hits":131},{"value":"1943","hits":127},{"value":"1942","hits":121},{"value":"1940","hits":120},{"value":"1936","hits":119},{"value":"1937","hits":119},{"value":"1939","hits":119},{"value":"1934","hits":118},{"value":"1932","hits":117},{"value":"1935","hits":117},{"value":"1941","hits":117},{"value":"1933","hits":116},{"value":"1938","hits":116},{"value":"1930","hits":114},{"value":"1924","hits":111},{"value":"1931","hits":111},{"value":"1929","hits":97},{"value":"1921","hits":95},{"value":"1928","hits":91},{"value":"1922","hits":90},{"value":"1923","hits":90},{"value":"1926","hits":90},{"value":"1927","hits":90},{"value":"1909","hits":89},{"value":"1925","hits":89},{"value":"1908","hits":88},{"value":"1911","hits":88},{"value":"1912","hits":88},{"value":"1907","hits":87},{"value":"1910","hits":87}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1061","max":"2034","count":27001,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4389},{"value":"correspondence","hits":288},{"value":"notes (documents)","hits":97},{"value":"lists (document genres)","hits":89},{"value":"memorandums","hits":84},{"value":"postcards","hits":56},{"value":"programs (documents)","hits":46},{"value":"reports","hits":39},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":38},{"value":"pamphlets","hits":38},{"value":"essays","hits":37}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1926},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":1168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":656},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":604},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":33},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":830},{"value":"Historical Manuscripts and Photographs","hits":764},{"value":"Theophilus Eugene ‘Bull’ Connor Papers, 1959-1963","hits":566},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":454},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","hits":447},{"value":"Civil Rights Library of St. Augustine","hits":372},{"value":"James T. McCain papers, 1957-1972","hits":257},{"value":"New insights in the American civil rights movement: South Carolina Council on Human Relations records","hits":249},{"value":"Judy Richardson Papers 1963-2014","hits":92},{"value":"March on Milwaukee: Civil Rights History Project","hits":85},{"value":"Faith Holsaert Papers 1950-2011","hits":45}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1279},{"value":"University of Southern Mississippi. Libraries","hits":765},{"value":"Birmingham Public Library (Ala.)","hits":567},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":549},{"value":"University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Libraries","hits":454},{"value":"Proctor Library","hits":372},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":321},{"value":"Duke University. Library","hits":137},{"value":"Golda Meir Library. Special Collections","hits":85},{"value":"Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Library Alliance","hits":50},{"value":"Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library","hits":49}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":4376},{"value":"Collection","hits":13}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":4383},{"value":"true","hits":6}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}