{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_264","title":"Recommendations for Little Rock School District, Campus Leadership initiative and Campus Incentives","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998/2001"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School management and organization","Teachers","School administrators"],"dcterms_title":["Recommendations for Little Rock School District, Campus Leadership initiative and Campus Incentives"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/264"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["223 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nI Leadership Team Expectations I I Leadership team members are expected to: make a commitment to improve outcomes for all students make team goals a higher priority than personal goals share information, perceptions and feedback openly confront important issues directly make objective judgements based on facts display leadership in ways which contribute to the teams success respond constructively to other team members collaborate effectively with other team members demonstrate a unified commitment to team goals and strategies understand consensus building identify and communicate statement of purpose for campus leadership identify and implement strategies to attain goals identify needs for adequate time, ongoing development and support (training) communicate team goals and strategies to staff, students, administration, school board, parents, and communityOperations Division - Financial Priorities November Cluster Meetings Operations Division has developed the following Financial Priorities for the 1998-99 school year: 1. Complete and implement the recommendations from the Management Audit. 2. List, fund, and begin renovation and repair projects in all district facilities. 3. Design, fund and construct Stephens and new west Little Rock schools. Timeline extends into year 2000 for these projects. 4. Develop plans for occupation of Garland and Mitchell buildings after construction and opening of Stephens school. 5. Develop plans for the possible relocation of administrative office space. 6. Complete and implement plans for the transportation of students for the 1999-2000 school year to comply with the new student assignment zones and the middle school conversion. 7. Develop and implement safety and security building and program modifications for the 1999-2000 school year. 8. Provide funding, procurement, and installation of technology projects in ail district facilities as outlined in the districts technology plan. Time line extends into year 2000. 9. Develop, administer, and implement Quality Index for Operations Division departments.RECEIVED Draft' APR 2 0 1988 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CAMPUS LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE AND CAMPUS INCENTIVES A proposed District plan by the Campus Based Administrators and Teachers Submitted to the Board of Education April 20, 1998 Draft:0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview Summary of Campus Leadership System Components Policy Consideration Administration Policy Board of Directors Policy Wavier Incentive Plan Incentive Plan Parameter Technical Assistance Decision Making Parameter Background Information and Question and Answers - Campus Leadership Plan Response FormRecommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Overview This is proposed in response to the Little Rock School District Strategic Plan, which called for a broad-based effort to move to a campus based leadership system. The effort was begun three years ago, but administrative changes delayed the development of a plan to promote participatory decision making in the district, particularly at the campus level. The intent was to assist the district in the development of district and campus plans that will result in improved student performance. The expected result of participatory decision making is improved student performance through\na. effective campus and district planning for the purpose of improved student performance\nb. improved community involvement in the school improvement process\nc. clearly established accountability parameters for student performance\nd. raised staff productivity and satisfaction\ne. improved communication and information flow\nf. consensus-based, effective decisions\ng- long-range commitment to implementation\nh. increased flexibility at the campus level in allocation of resources\nI. coordination of program components.Reconunendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus The proposed campus based leadership system is intended to drive fundamental changes in classroom teaching by helping the campuses and district focus on improved student achievement. The six basic components of campus-based leadership are: 1. 2. 3. Commitment to improved student achievement for all students. Improved student achievement will be based on established local goals for student performance. A system of incentives for student performance will be established, which will include multiple and alternative performance measures. Collaborative structure and process. Policies and procedures guide the establishment of district and campus level decision making to ensure representative collaboration of principals, teachers, other staff, parents, business partners, and community members. Decentralization Parameters The specific areas for implementation with respect to goal setting, classroom instruction, and campus organization are included. Deregulation avenues are provided to waive local policies and state regulations if they inhibit improved student performance. 4. Statement of Purpose of Participatory Decision-Making. The uniqueness of each campus related to its needs, and its decision making capacity to address those needs, are acknowledged in district policy and demonstrated through actual practice. 5. Adequate time, ongoing staff development and technical support. Sufficient time is allotted to allow for the development of skills and attitudes that will ensure effective campus based decision making. 6. Procedures for planning and evaluating student achievement goals and decision making process. Organizational and management procedures are established to guide the progress of participatory decision making in the district and on the individual campus. An evaluation process is developed and used to assess locally established performance goals and the effectiveness of committee and campus decision-making and further the impact of decision making on student performance.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus We acknowledge that planning and implementing these components of campus based decision making will require a re-conceptualization of the roles and responsibilities of board members, central office administrators, campus principals, teachers, support staff, parents, business partners, and community representatives. This strategy for school and instructional improvement with a strong incentive initiative will only succeed if it is carefully planned with relevant input from the stakeholders. The proposed campus leadership system is based on the concept of continuous improvement. Every campus can improve. Every campus is expected to show academic growth. Every school will benefit by reaching achievable standards. Summary of Campus Leadership System Components The basic components are: 1. 2. 3. 4. Board and administrative policy, which support a system of participatory decision making at the campus and district level. Identification of quality indicators and an incentive plan, which promotes increases in student performance. Staff development plans and technical assistance, which will support the implementation of the campus leadership system. The assistance will support the planning and technical support for continuous improvement at the campus and district level. Clear guidelines for participatory decision making. The parameters for decision making give guidance to the level and type of decision which is made at Federal/State/District levels, those which are better made at the campus/classroom level, and finally those which are collaborative.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Policy Considerations The following is the recommended policy for implementation of the Campus Leadership Plan and participatory decision making: The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District believes that a fundamental responsibility of the school system is to support the sustained improvement of the schools. Site-based decision making provides each school with a framework to attain the Districts mission. Shared decision-making allows representation of administration, staff, students, parents, and patrons to provide more efficient use of time and energy. This facilitates a quality environment for students, a productive working environment for staff members, and increased opportunity for community involvement in our schools. To effect this belief, each school shall establish a campus team to improve performance of all student populations. This team will assist in the development and evaluation of campus goals and objectives through planning, budgeting, curriculum development, staff development, and staffing needs. Through consensus based decisions, the campus teams will support the Districts commitment to the sustained improvement of n schools. Administrative Policy Student achievement is the primary focus of the Little Rock School District. Each campus accepts the responsibility and challenge to provide equitable educational opportunities that ensure every student is successful. Therefore, each Little Rock School District campus is committed to establishing a campus team that will work collaboratively with the principal in the decision-making process to enhance student achievement. Membership. The membership for each campus team shall consist of\nCAMPUS TEAM MATRIX RECOMMENDED NUMBER OF POSITIONS 1 5-10 1 2 1 1 1 1 _______Principal_______ Certified Teachers Central Office Parent Business ______Community______ Non-certified School Staff Student POSITION TITLE Chairman Elected Invited/Appointed Appointed Appointed Appointed_____ Elected or appointed Elected or appointed MEMBERSHIP Required Required Required Required Required Required Optional Optional Note: Classroom teachers must be at least 60% of the faculty/staff/central office component.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Nomination: The principal shall publish procedures to be utilized for the nomination and election of representatives to the campus team. The principal shall post the election procedure regulations and policy a minimum of ten days prior to the called election. The prescribed form must be used with elected representatives to the campus team. The form indicates their willingness to serve and shall be kept on file in the principals office. Election: The consent of each nominee shall be obtained before the persons name may appear on the secret ballot. Election of the campus team shall be completed by November 1. Election Procedures: The election of representatives to the campus team will be made by secret ballot. On the date of the election, ballots will be distributed to all eligible voters. The ballot will contain the names of all nominees according to their respective grouping and instructions on how each nominee may be chosen by voters. The principal and designated staff members will tabulate completed ballots. Term: Elected representatives shall serve staggered two-year terms. In the first election, 50% of the elected membership will serve a one-year term. Appointed representatives are not subject to term limitations, but rotation of appointed representatives is encouraged unless there are no other volunteers willing to participate. Vacancy: If a vacancy occurs among the elected representatives, nominations shall be solicited and an election held for the vacant position in the same manner as the annual election. If a vacancy occurs within 5 months of the end of a term, the principal may, but is not required to, fill the vacancy - elected or appointed. Appointed Members: The principal has discretionary privilege to appoint the parents, business leaders, community members, non-certified staff, and students. Appointed members have all the rights and responsibilities as elected members. Thirty days prior to the appointments in November, the principal shall communicate the process of receiving nominations or recommendations. If a vacancy occurs among the appointed representatives, another person will be selected to fill the vacant position. Meetings: The principal shall serve as chairman of the campus team, set its agenda, and shall schedule at least four (4) meetings per year. The agenda and minutes of the meetings will be posted and filed.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Board of Directors Policy Waivers The Little Rock School District believes that the District or a campus team may apply for a waiver of a requirement or prohibition imposed by law or rule. The waiver must be in written form following the procedures designated by the Board. A waiver must include:  Identification of the statutory requirements for which a waiver is requested.  Description of why the waiver is needed and the goals that would be achieved if granted. a Descriptions of the measurement process that will be used if the waiver is granted and program is implemented.  Description of how the interested parties were notified of the waiver request. a Descriptions of federal, state, and district requirements to be waived. Restrictions: The district or campus team may not receive an exemption or waiver from requirements imposed by federal law or rule such as Goals 2000, Educate America Act, Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA), and School to Work Opportunities Act, or from a requirement or prohibition imposed by state law. Waiver Application: A waiver request application form may be obtained by the principal from the Associate Superintendent of Instruction. The principal is to enlist the review of the campus team and obtain consensus before the waiver is processed. The completed waiver must be submitted to the superintendent for review and processing. Requirements for a waiver by the state must follow regulations as described in the Submission and Approval section. A waiver application to be acted upon for the next academic year must be submitted to the District by , to the state by , and to the federal government by Submission and Approval: The application shall be submitted to the superintendent no later than the semester before the campus intends to take action. The superintendent will inform the principal of the action taken within thirty days. A waiver requiring the Arkansas Department of Education or the Arkansas State Board of Education action must be acted upon by the District Board before forwarding to the Arkansas Department of Education. District Board action should be consistent with state and federal guidelines.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Incentive Plan The Cluster representatives recommend the following as the initial quality index for the Little Rock School District. Campus and district performance on the indicators shall be compared to established standards. The degree of change from one school year to the next on each indicator shall be considered. The indicators shall include: a. The results of assessment instruments aggregated by grade level and subject area b. Dropout rates c. Student attendance rates d. The percentage of students who have unconditional enrollment to an Arkansas institution of higher education e. The results of the American College Test (ACT) f. The percentage of graduating seniors who take the American College Test (ACT) g- Customer Service Index h. School Climate Index I. Any other indicator the LRSD Board adopts Performance on the indicators shall be based on information that is disaggregated with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic status. Performance shall be compared to state and local growth standards and comparable improvement. Comparable improvement is derived by measuring individual campuses and the District against a profile developed from a total urban data base that exhibits substantial equivalence of the characteristics of students served by the campus or District, including past academic performances, socio-economic status and ethnicity.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Incentive Plan Parameters a. The award must be a group effort as opposed to individual. b. The award must be based on multiple criteria, with emphasis on increasing student achievement for all students. c. The award must be non-competitive in that every group that meets the designated criteria qualifies for the award. d. The plan should promote teamwork and collaboration. e. The criteria should have measurable results that are attainable and cannot be easily manipulated. f. Guidelines should be easily understood. g. The incentive program plan will be an exposition of Total Quality Schools philosophy. h. Rewards shall be of significant value to the division and campus. The proposed accountability system is intended to drive fundamental change in classroom teaching by helping schools focus on improved student achievement. The system is designed to encourage and support school improvement by:  Clearly establishing the Districts Goals for schools and students\na Creating an easy way to communicate to schools and the public how well a school is performing\na Recognizing and rewarding schools fortheir effectiveness in demonstrating growth in student achievement: and  Focusing attention, energy, and resources on those schools that need help improving student achievement.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Technical Assistance The basic framework for staff development and technical assistance will be Total Quality Schools. The training components are categorized under four headings and sequences. 1. POLICIES/PARAMETERS, TEAMING, INCENTIVE AWARDS, AND TOTAL QUALITY SCHOOLS TOOLS Policy/Parameters would be taught in a joint session that would be more informational and less interactive. We would anticipate that this would be provided to the campus principals and district administrators in the summer of 1998. There would an informational session presented to the campus staff prior to the election of the campus teams in the fall of 1998. Further informational and training sessions would be scheduled and modified as needed after the initial evaluation had been completed. 2. TEAMING The areas to be reviewed and skills acquired would be empowerment, change process, consensus building, conflict resolution, needs assessment, data analysis, and the hows and whys of how teams produce high performance among students and staff. Training would be offered at multiple times based on the appointment and election of new team members. Initial training would be during the winter of 1998-99. 3. INCENTIVE PROGRAM The incentive program rewards campuses and divisions of the school district for improvement in the quality indicators. Note the listing of the indicators in the third component in this section. The session will deal with specific strategies that may be utilized to increase performance of the campus. The training will be first developed with campus and district staff and customized to be presented during the summer of 1999 to campus teams at the Cluster Meetings. Cluster meetings will be scheduled at the end of July for the campus teams to offer specific training based on the campus teams needs assessment. 4. TOTAL QUALITY SCHOOLS Training is envisioned to be provided to all staff of the school district based on four specific components. Little Rock School District bases the Quality Schooling Process on the beliefs that:Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus  Continuous improvement is the goal for which every campus and division strives.  Continuous training and education for all personnel must be provided.  Customer satisfaction is gained by conformance to customer requirements. a Decisions must be data driven. The training vtfould be developed initially with the district administrators and partnered with area businesses that had adopted the total quality precepts. We envision that the training would start with administrators and teams in the summer of 1999. Staff of the school district would begin in the fall of 1999 and continue through the next two years. Decision Making Parameters EXAMPLE - SBDM MATRIX: FUNCTION Curriculum Curriculum Resources DISTRICT/STATE Standards-based objectives on content \u0026amp; skills. Scope \u0026amp; sequence. Pre-K- 12, assessment framework, instructional strategies from research, thematic integration and project activities. Support and facilitate campus plans based on available resources COLLABORATION Monitor curriculum according to the following  Implementation  District resources  Assessment processes  Transitions among campuses and between levels  Action research on instructional strategies Define district and campus responsibilities for materials, resources and budget allocations. CAMPUS Recommend staff to develop curriculum. Recommend new programs and/or extensions of existing programs Use curriculum framework within which classroom teachers decide the following information:  Use of optional components  Use of enrichment objectives  Design of lesson plan content and activities  Use of assessments within district parameters (district, classroom \u0026amp; state)  Modification of curriculum for special needs students  Strategies for instructional delivery within district parameters Organize resources at campus for accessibility to staff and programs. Determine resources for campus plan involving district personnel as needed. ACCOUNTABILITYRecommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Background Information and Question and Answers - Campus Leadership Plan 1. 2. 3. Why was the Campus Leadership system created? The Little Rock School District strategic plan was developed by a combination of staff and community, it was determined that site leadership was a reform movement which should be implemented. The plan is very inclusive based on the membership of not only staff, but parents, community members and business partners. The incentive plan is a positive form of campus accountability which places the emphasis on the group rather than individual. It is believed that rewarding improved student performance and empowering staff at the campuses will result in improved student performance. The overall plan is consistent with rewarding improvement based on the Total Quality precepts. Who developed the incentive system? The original philosophical basis of the plan was developed by Cluster A. The steering committee for the complete plan endorsed the recommended plan. A list of the schools and individuals is located on the last page of this monograph. What are the underlying beliefs of the proposed plan for participatory decision making? On the first page of this document there are listed the expected results of moving to a campus leadership plan for the purpose of increased student performance. As such, there is also a strong belief that continuous improvement and total quality performance are major aspects behind the plan. 4. How have participatory decision making systems and incentive systems improved student achievement in other districts? School districts in Tennessee, Kentucky, Maryland and Texas have all reported positive gains in student achievement. These states all have statewide plans and they are encouraged to add local incentives. There are other examples but we concentrated on these four states.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. There are several terms used to describe the campus decision making process. What are the differences? The term Campus Leadership is utilized by the Arkansas Leadership Academy to describe the empowerment process. The Arkansas Leadership Academy was established by the Arkansas Legislature. The terms of sitebased decision making, participatory decision making and campus leadership may be utilized interchangeably. The final document will utilize one term, exclusively. How was the membership of the campus team decided? There was a search of the literature regarding the composition of campus teams in various states. The committee felt that this would be the initial proposal but it could be made smaller or larger based on the evaluation after the implementation years. The committee wanted to be as inclusive as possible. How will the staff and the public be kept informed about this improvement initiative? The school district will report the degree of implementation annually as part of the District Report Card. Particular emphasis will be placed on improvement of the factors identified on the Quality Indicator Index. Campuses will make a similar report based on their individual initiatives and their specific report card. The results of the incentive plan and awards for progress will be reported annually at the beginning of the school year. How wiii the District measure growth? The District will be looking at the specific quality education indicators to measure a schools performance for incentive awards. The emphasis will be on improvement in student performance. We will look at the growth which occurred during the academic year. A student must be enrolled as of October 1 to be calculated in the growth index. Will special education students be part of the assessment? Yes, but we have not developed all the rules regarding required growth. We anticipate the special education students will be added the 2\"^ year of the plan.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Why are students not being considered part of the plan who are enrolled prior to October 1? Several of the district schools have extremely high mobility rates and many times we are testing students who have not been part of the Little Rock instructional program. The students will be tested, but will not be part of the accountability measure which qualifies the campus for an incentive award. What tests will be used to assess student achievement gains? The district will utilize the state norm referenced test as one of the measures. We also will utilize criterion reference assessments, which will indicate mastery of the basic and grade level skills. What are Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs)? Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs) are tests designed by textbook publishers and others to measure the degree in which a student has met previously established standards. The level of expectation is based on the grade level and by academic core subject. What are Norm Referenced Tests (NRTs)? Norm Referenced Tests compare the performance of Little Rock students to the performance of students nationally. The Stanford 9 is currently being used by the State for this purpose. Why are dropout rates and student attendance being included in the formula? Dropout rates and student attendance were selected, because of the consistent and accurate manner in which they are collected for each school. Although campuses do not have total control over these factors, data from research studies show that dropout rates decrease and attendance rates increase when appropriate classroom instruction and supportive school environment address the diverse needs of students. What other measures will be utilized? Arkansas has a very low college attendance rate. The emphasis on the ACT and college preparatory program will assist more of the districts young people to qualify for college entrance. This will also assist in preparing more of the district's students to qualify for higher level jobs in the future.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Why was School Climate and Customer Service indexes used? A positive school climate is directly related to the quality and amount of learning that takes place on the campus. We all are customers to some degree of the public education institution. Having knovi/ledge of the perceptions of the customers and particularly those who employ the districts students can be an excellent school improvement strategy. How can schools appeal decisions pertaining to their growth? An appeals process will be established that will enable campuses to appeal various issues to the Superintendent. Issues that could serve as the basis of the appeal might be: missing the award by a fraction\nschool grade-level reconfiguration\nhaving an extremely small number of students in a category, etc. Will schools be expected to demonstrate improvement? Each school will be expected to show growth. Schools whose achievement is below that of the expected norm will be placed on Warned Status and offered technical assistance. If improvement is not forthcoming the school will be placed on Probationary Status. Technical assistance with full evaluation of the school will be accomplished to assist the campus. Recognized educators will also be asked to consult with the campus staff. What happens if student achievement is still below expected norms and with little or no growth in student achievement? The school will be a candidate for reconstitution. Who will set the norms for expected improvement? A committee of teachers, parents, administrators and technical experts will establish reasonable standards for each of the areas identified by the Quality Indicator Index. Expected growth will also be calculated by identifying and quantifying the difference between where a school is currently with the expected standard for each area. The Board of Directors will have final authority to establish the standard and expected growth rate. Is the development of the campus leadership plan and the incentive plan finalized? This is a draft report and we anticipate additions and corrections to the current plan. The response form will be utilized to gain additional input prior to recommending the plan to the Board of Directors for approval. The plan calls for an in-depth evaluation to be completed after the 2*^ year of operation.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus Response Form Name: School (Name is not required) Gender: Male___Female_ Race: White Black__Hispanic__Asian Native American__Other___ Please indicate the primary group to which you belong or wish to be identified. Teacher___Other School Employee___Parent Student Business Representative___Community Citizen____ Note\nyou may give comments in the area below each question. Please be specific. 1. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means the quality of education is very poor and 5 means the quality of education is excellent, how would you rate the quality of education in Little Rock Schools? Very Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent Comments/Altematives (Please print) 2. Do you agree or disagree that the proposed plan for campus leadership/participatory decision making will encourage improvement in student achievement within the Little Rock School District? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print)Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus 3. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended Quality indicators will fairly measure learning occurring in the school district? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree 4. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended incentives will encourage improvement in student achievement in our schools? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree 5. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended corrective action will help schools improve? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree 6. Do you agree or disagree that every school should be expected to shovi/ continual growth? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) AgreeRecommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative and Campus 7. Do you agree or disagree that clear parameters for campus decision making should be part of the participatory decision making plan? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Cominents/Altematives (Please print) Agree 8. Do you agree or disagree that high priority should be given to the technical assistance and communication? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree 9. And finally, what one comment concerning the proposed campus leadership / participatory decision making plan \u0026amp; proposed incentive system would you make? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree Thank you for responding. Please return by May 8. 1998, to: Little Rock School District ATTN: Superintendents Office 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201Central Dunbar Henderson School Pulaski Heights Jr. Badgett Bale Forest Park Jefferson Mitchell Pulaski Heights ADMINISTRATION School Fair Mabelvale Jr. Southwest Booker Magnet Garland King Mabelvale Meadowcliff Otter Creek Wilson ADMINISTRATION CLUSTER A/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Rudolph Howard Betsy Hall-Jones Linda Brown Julie Western James Washington Principal/Staff Representative Mona Briggs Wayne Knight Mary Golston Janice Gunderman Barbara Anderson Lisa Cunningham Virginia Ashley Janet Ghant Frances Cawthon Lucy Rhodes Lillie Scull Margaret Regnier Lillie Carter LauraBeth Arnold Marion Woods Patty Kohler Victor Anderson CLUSTER B/ACCOUNTABILITY William Broadnax Rosie Beyah Jim Fullerton/Pat Boykins Dorothy Jones Walter Marshaleck Principal/Staff Representative Cheryl Carson Vivian Dooley Lionel Ward Wanda Keith Tyrone Harris Ann Gregory Tab Phillips Marilyn Jacuzzi Jerry Worm Betsy Pruss Carolyn Teeter Janis Tucker Beverly Jones Susan West Sadie Mitchell Lucy Lyon Catherine Gill Gene Parker Dennis Glasgow Paulette MartinHall Forest Heights Brady Carver Magnet Fair Park Franklin Fulbright McDermott Romine Williams Magnet School ADMINISTRATION McClellan Cloverdale Jr. Chicot Cloverdale Eiem. Geyer Springs Rightsell Rockefeller Wakefield Washington Watson CLUSTER C/POLICIES Gayle Bradford Dennis Brant Vernon Smith Vincent Dodson Ada Keown Susanne Gamble Dianne Barksdale Linda Ammel Samuel Branch Ethel Dunbar Sheryl Jackson Mac Huffman Thelma Watson Mike Oliver Terese Klaus Sharon Davis Dianne Langley Mary Menking Nancy Morton Sadie Mitchell Marie McNeal Leon Adams Linda Young Principal/Staff Representative CLUSTER D/PARAMETERS (Business, Resources, Discipline) School ADMINISTRATION Jodie Carter Loretta Davenport Cassandra Norman Jack Jones Jane Harkey Barbara Williams Frederick Fields Tammi Dockett-Wilson Susan Beard Evelyn Stubblefield Sharon Brooks Delwin Smith Anne Mangan Dana Keller Mary Jane Cheatham Gail Washington Karen Buchanan Rose Barnes Theresa Courtney Kristen Laughlin Mable Donaldson Gene Parker Pat Price Brady Gadberry Linda Watson Dick Hurley Principal/Staff RepresentativeParkview Metropolitan ALC Mann Magnet Baseline Dodd Gibbs Magnet Terry Western Hills Woodruff School ADMINISTRATION CLUSTER E/PARAMETERS (Instruction) Principal/Staff Representative Junious Babbs Marcelline Can- Mike Peterson (did not attend 1 meeting) Johnny Neeley Tracey Montgomery Marian Lacey Bonnie Bumpers Eleanor Cox Cathy Koehler Faith Donovan Barbara Kennedy Felicia Hobbs Ann Hurd Nancy Mitchell Gwen Ziegler Margo Rowe Scott Morgan Ruth Schwerin Pat Higginbotham Linda Berman Victor Anderson Carol Green Patty Kohler Marion Shead-Jackson Dennis Glasgow Mark MilhollenLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE CAMPUS LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE NAME Mary Menking Junious Babbs Marion lacey Carol Green Patty Kohler Sadie Mitchell Mark Milhollen Gail Shelton Phillip Burch Doris Williams Patty Scherer Charles Foote Mary Zakrzewski Dennis Brant Betsy Hale-Jones Wayne Knight Willie Hinton ORGANIZATION LRSD_______________ Williams_____________ Parkview____________ Mann_______________ Central Office________ Central Office________ Central Office________ Central Office________ Rockefeller/Rightsell PIE PTA________________ Forest Park__________ Fulbright____________ Forest Heights Hall_________________ Central______________ Pulaski Heights Jr. High City of Little Rock TITLE Board Member Principal Principal Principal Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Business Office Speech Therapist Advisory Committee President Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher Teacher DirectorLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: CAMPUS LEADERSHIP The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District believes that a fundamental responsibility of the school system is to support the sustained improvement of the schools. Site-based decision making provides each school with a framework to attain the Districts mission. Shared decision-making allows representation of administration, staff, students, parents, and patrons to provide more efficient use of time and energy. This facilitates a quality environment for students, a productive working environment for staff members, and increased opportunity for community involvement in our schools. To effect this belief, it is the policy of the Board of Education of the LRSD, that each school shall establish a campus leadership team to improve performance of all student populations. This team will assist in the development and evaluation of campus goals and objectives through planning, budgeting, curriculum development, staff development, and staffing needs. Through consensus based decisions, the campus teams will support the Districts commitment to the sustained improvement of schools.RE BED JUN 5- 1998 Little Rock School District 5 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MOMITORIMQ OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 4,1998 Dear Patron: The enclosed Campus Leadership Plan is the Districts attempt to develop a comprehensive strategy to promote improved student performance through a decentralized approach to decision making. We are utilizing the term Campus Leadership because of initiatives of the Arkansas Leadership Academy to promote shared decision making and empowering communities for improved student performance. The attached document is divided into five sections with a response form, which we hope you will complete and return by June 20\",1998. The first section, pages 1-8, provides an overview and basic policy for decentralized decision making. The plan has been developed by teachers, principals, and other administrators. The origin of the initiative was called for by the Little Rock School District Strategic Plan in 1995-96. The steering committee which edited their work also consisted of parents and community representatives. Campus Leadership Teams will be developed in the fall of 1998. The second section , pages 9-13, includes a rough draft of an incentive and accountability plan. We would anticipate that this portion of the plan would be completed during the fall of 1998. The Quality Index parallels the Arkansas Campus and District Report Card. The third section, pages 14-15, is an outline of the technical assistance which is envisioned to be a major communication and development program of the school district. If the process is to be a dynamic and growing program, the training and technical assistance must remain a major priority. The fourth section, pages 16-30, is the initial attempt to define the parameters for decision making and to provide for collaboration between the District and the individual campuses. This is noted as the initial effort\nas we become more familiar with the process, this particular section of the document will be refined every two years. The fifth section, pages 31-35, are several of the most often asked questions about the Campus Leadership Plan. If you have additional questions, Patty Kohler (324-2190) and Sadie Mitchell (324-2007) have been with this initiative from the inception with the Little Rock Strategic Plan. And finally, there is a short response form which we would appreciate your completing and returning by June 20, 1998. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Leaie V, irflTne Supe^tendent of Schools 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 824-2000  ' RECEIVED JUN 5 iggg OFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING VKaft:#4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CAMPUS LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE AND CAMPUS INCENTIVES A proposed District plan by the Campus Based Administrators and Teachers Submitted to the Board of Education April 20, 1998TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview Campus Leadership System Summary of Campus Leadership Plan Components Board of Education Policy Consideration Campus Leadership Team Administrative Policy Planning and Decision Making Process Board of Education Policy Waivers Quality Index Incentive Plan Parameters Value Added Quality Index Technical Assistance PDM Matrix: Staff Development (Cluster D) PDM Matrix: (Cluster E) Background Information \u0026amp; Questions \u0026amp; Answers - Campus Leadership Plan Response Form PAGE 1 2 3 4 ' 4 6 8 9 10 11 14 16 21 31 36Overview This is proposed in response to the Little Rock School District Strategic Plan, which called for a broad-based effort to move to a campus based leadership system. The effort was begun three years ago, but administrative changes delayed the development of a plan to promote campus leadership in the District, particularly at the campus level. The intent was to assist the District in the development of District and campus plans that will result in improved student performance. The expected result of campus leadership is improved student performance through: a. effective campus and District planning for the purpose of improved student performance\nb. improved community involvement in the school improvement process\nc. clearly established accountability parameters for student performance\nd. raised staff productivity and satisfaction\ne. improved communication and information flow\nf. consensus-based, effective decisions\ng. long-range commitment to implementation\nh. increased flexibility at the campus level in allocation of resources\nI. coordination of program components.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 2 Campus Leadership System The proposed campus based leadership system is intended to drive fundamental changes in classroom teaching by helping the campuses and District focus on improved student achievement. The six basic components of campus-based leadership are: 1. Commitment to improved student achievement for all students. Improved student achievement will be based on established local goals for student performance. A system of incentives for student performance will be established, which will include multiple and alternative performance measures. 2. Collaborative structure and process. Policies and procedures guide the establishment of District and campus leadership to ensure representative collaboration of principals, teachers, other staff, parents, business partners, and community members. 3. Decentralization Parameters The specific areas for implementation with respect to goal setting, classroom instruction, and campus organization are included. Deregulation avenues are provided to waive local policies and state regulations if they inhibit improved student performance. 4. Statement of Purpose of Campus Leadership. The uniqueness of each campus related to its needs, and its decision making capacity to address those needs, are acknowledged in District policy and demonstrated through actual practice. 5. Adequate time, ongoing staff development and technical support. Sufficient time is allotted to allow for the development of skills and attitudes that will ensure effective campus leadership. 6. Procedures for planning and evaluating student achievement goals and decision making process.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 3 Organizational and management procedures are established to guide the progress of campus leadership in the District and on the individual campus. An evaluation process is developed and used to assess locally established performance goals and the effectiveness of committee and campus leadership and further the impact of decision making on student performance. We acknowledge that planning and implementing these components of campus leadership will require a re-conceptualization of the roles and responsibilities of board members, central office administrators, campus principals, teachers, support staff, parents, business partners, and community representatives. This strategy for school and instructional improvement with a strong incentive initiative will only succeed if it is carefully planned with relevant input from the stakeholders. The proposed campus leadership system is based on the concept of continuous improvement. Every campus can improve. Every campus is expected to show academic growth. Every school will benefit by reaching achievable standards. Summary of Campus Leadership Plan Components The plan components are: 1. 2. 3. 4. Board and administrative policy, which support a system of campus leadership at the campus and District level. Identification of quality indicators and an incentive plan, which promotes increases in student performance. Staff development plans and technical assistance, which will support the implementation of the campus leadership system. The assistance will support the planning and technical support for continuous improvement at the campus and District level. Clear guidelines for campus leadership. The parameters for decision making give guidance to the level and type of decision which is made at Federai/State/District levels, those which are better made at the campus/classroom level, and finally those which are collaborative.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 4 Board of Education Policy Consideration The following is the recommended policy for implementation of the Campus Leadership Plan and campus leadership: The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District believes that a fundamental responsibility of the school system is to support the sustained improvement of the schools. Site-based decision making provides each school with a framework to attain the Districts mission. Shared decision-making allows representation of administration, staff, students, parents, and patrons to provide more efficient use of time and energy. This facilitates a quality environment for students, a productive working environment for staff members, and increased opportunity for community involvement in our schools. To effect this belief, it is the policy of the Board of Education of the LRSD, that each school shall establish a campus leadership team to improve performance of all student populations. This team will assist in the development and evaluation of campus goals and objectives through planning, budgeting, curriculum development, staff development, and staffing needs. Through consensus based decisions, the campus teams will support the Districts commitment to the sustained improvement of schools. Campus Leadership Team Administrative Policy Student achievement is the primary focus of the Little Rock School District. Each campus accepts the responsibility and challenge to provide equitable educational opportunities that ensure every student is successful. Therefore, each Little Rock School District campus is committed to establishing a campus leadership team that will work collaboratively with the principal in the decision-making process to enhance student achievement. Membership: The membership for each campus team shall consist of\nCAMPUS TEAM MATRIX RECOMMENDED NUMBER OF POSITIONS 1 5-10 1 2 1 _1_ 1 1 _______Principal_______ Certified Teachers Central Office Parent Business ______Community______ Non-certified School Staff Student POSITION TITLE Chairman Elected Invited/Appointed Appointed Appointed _____Appointed_____ Elected or appointed Elected or appointed MEMBERSHIP Required Required Required Required Required Required Optional Optional Note: Classroom teachers must be at least 60% of the faculty/staff/central office component.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 5 Nomination: The principal shall publish procedures to be utilized for the nomination and election of representatives to the campus team. The principal shall post the election procedure regulations and policy a minimum of ten days prior to the called election. The prescribed form must be used with elected representatives to the campus team. The form indicates their willingness to serve and shall be kept on file in the principals office. Election: The consent of each nominee shall be obtained before the persons name may appear on the secret ballot. Election of the campus team shall be completed by November 1. Election Procedures: The election of representatives to the campus team will be made by secret ballot. On the date of the election, ballots will be distributed to all eligible voters. The ballot will contain the names of all nominees according to their respective grouping and instructions on how each nominee may be chosen by voters. The principal and designated staff members will tabulate completed ballots. Term: Elected representatives shall serve staggered two-year terms. In the first election, 50% of the elected membership will serve a one-year term. Elected representatives may serve two consecutive terms. Appointed representatives are not subject to term limitations, but rotation of appointed representatives is encouraged unless there are no other volunteers willing to participate. Vacancy: If a vacancy occurs among the elected representatives, nominations shall be solicited and an election held for the vacant position in the same manner as the annual election. If a vacancy occurs within 5 months of the end of a term, the principal may, but is not required to, fill the vacancy - elected or appointed. Appointed Members: The principal has discretionary privilege to appoint the parents, business leaders, community members, non-certified staff, and students. Appointed members have ail the rights and responsibilities as elected members. Thirty days prior to the appointments in November, the principal shall communicate the process of receiving nominations or recommendations. If a vacancy occurs among the appointed representatives, another person will be selected to fill the vacant position. Definitions: For the purposes of establishing the composition of campus teams: 1. 2. 3. A person who stands in parental relation to a student is considered a parent. A parent who is an employee of the District is not considered a representative of community members on the committee. Community members must reside in the District and must be at least 18 years of age.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 6 Meetings: The principal shall serve as chairman of the campus leadership team, set its agenda, and shall schedule at least four (4) meetings per year. The agenda and minutes of the meetings will be posted and filed. On an annual basis, each principal with the assistance of the campus leadership team shall review and revise the campus improvement plan (COE) for the purpose of improving student performance. The Board shall also ensure that an administrative policy is provided to clearly define the respective roles and responsibilities of the superintendent, central office staff, principals, teachers, and campus team members in the areas of: a. b. c. d. e. f. planning budgeting curriculum staffing patterns staff development school organization Planning and Decision Making Process Decision Making: In accordance with Board policy the campus team shall be involved in decisions in the areas of planning, budgeting, curriculum, staffing patterns, staff development and school organization, and serve in an advisory capacity to the principal. Procedures: Each campus shall maintain current policies and procedures to ensure that effective planning and site-based decision making occur at each campus to direct and support the improvement of student performance for all students. Process: The Board shall establish a procedure under which meetings are held regularly by campus teams that include representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled in the District, and community members. Campus teams shall include business representatives, without regard to whether a business representative resides in the District or whether the business the person represents is located in the District. Pian: Each school year the principal of each school campus, with the assistance of the campus team, shall develop, review and revise the campus improvement plan for the purpose of improving student performance for all student populations with respect to the academic quality indicators and any other appropriate performance measures for special populations.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 7 Staff Development: The campus team must approve the portions of the campus plan addressing campus staff development needs. Consultation by Principal: The principal shall regularly consult the campus team in the planning operation, supervision and evaluation of the campus education program. Public Meeting: The campus team shall hold at least one public meeting per year. The required meeting shall be held after receipt of the campus evaluation to discuss the performance on the performance objectives. District policy and campus procedures must be established to ensure that systematic communications measures are in place to periodically obtain broad-based community, parent, and staffing input, and to provide information to those persons regarding the recommendations of the campus team. Campus Level Plan: Each Campus Improvement Plan (COE) must: 1. Assess the academic achievement for each student in the school using the academic quality system. 2. Set the campus performance objectives based on the academic quality indicator system, including objectives for special needs populations. 3. Identify how the campus goals will be met for each student. 4. Determine the resources needed to implement the plan. 5. Identify the staff needed to implement the plan. 6. Set time lines for reaching the goals. 7. Measure progress toward the performance objectives periodically to ensure that the plan is resulting in academic achievement. 8. Include an annual report with results to be shared with the team, staff, parents and the appropriate assistant superintendent.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 8 Board of Education Policy Waivers The Board of Education of the Little Rock School District believes that the District or a campus leadership team should have the option of applying for a waiver of a requirement or prohibition imposed by law or rule. It is the policy of the Board of Education of the LRSD to support the waiver process for local schools to seek relief from requirements or prohibition imposed by law or rule. The waiver must be in written form following the procedures outlined below.  Identification of the statutory requirements for which a waiver is requested.  Description of why the waiver is needed and the goals that would be achieved if granted. a Descriptions of the measurement process that will be used if the waiver is granted and program is implemented. a Description of how the interested parties were notified of the waiver request.  Descriptions of federal, state, and District requirements to be waived. Restrictions: The District or campus team may not receive an exemption or waiver from requirements imposed by federal law or rule such as Goals 2000, Educate America Act, Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA), and School to Work Opportunities Act, or from a requirement or prohibition imposed by state law. Waiver Application: A waiver request application form may be obtained by the principal from the Associate Superintendent of Instruction. The principal is to enlist the review of the campus team and obtain consensus before the waiver is processed. The completed waiver must be submitted to the superintendent for review and processing. Requirements for a waiver by the state must follow regulations as described in the Submission and Approval section. A waiver application to be acted upon for the next academic year must be submitted to the District by , to the state by , and to the federal government by Submission and Approval: The application shall be submitted to the superintendent no later than the semester before the campus intends to take action. The superintendent will inform the principal of the action taken within thirty days. A waiver requiring the Arkansas Department of Education or the Arkansas State Board of Education action must be acted upon by the District Board before forwarding to the Arkansas Department of Education. District Board action should be consistent with state and federal guidelines.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 9 Quality Index The committee members recommend that the Little Rock School District adopt a value-added quality index as the tool for managing a campus-based incentive plan. The value added quality index shall be comprised of specific indicators and corresponding measurements that collectively guide each school and the District toward a comnion goal of improving student achievement in accordance with specified standards. Adopting a standardized value added index would allow each campus to determine a reasonable and appropriate starting point for achieving the District goal, which will be defined as a growth standard. Based on where that starting point lies on the goals rubric, each campus will aim to achieve annual benchmarks so that appropriate and realistic progress is made toward achieving the District growth standards. The rubric will identify both an annual growth goal (AGG) which will serve as the benchmark and what constitutes minimum acceptable grovrth (MAG). The AGG and the MAG will provide the parameters for awarding incentives based on the total points accrued by each school after all indicators have been reviewed via the quantifiable results of each applicable measurement. The indicators shall include: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Student achievement Dropout rates Student attendance Teacher attendance Customer service School climate Any additional indicator adopted by the LRSD Board. The results of the individual measurements that provide information about indicator performance shall be disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. Measurement results will also be subjected to a weighted scale that takes into account the degree to which student mobility has impacted the measurement results on each campus. Consideration of mobility impact and other disaggregated data will ensure equitable distribution of incentives within a management system that is fair to all schools. The proposed value added quality index shall include a definition for each indicator and the corresponding measurements organized on a matrix that identifies grade level applicability and possible AGG and MAG incentive points.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 10 A school goals rubric divided into baseline quartiles with annual benchmarks and a growth standard shall also be included for each indicator. Total Annual Growth Goal and Minimum Acceptable Growth incentive points will determine each schools incentive eligibility on an overall incentive point scale. It is recommended that qualified statisticians assign incentive points to all AGG and MAG categories and that they design the rubric and incentive point scales to ensure the accuracy and validity of the proposed system. Incentive Plan Parameters a. b. c. d. The award must be a group effort as opposed to individual. The award must be based on multiple criteria, with emphasis on increasing student achievement for all students. The award must be non-competitive in that every group that meets the designated criteria qualifies for the award. The pian should promote teamwork and collaboration. e. The criteria should have measurable results that are attainable and f. g- h. cannot be easily manipulated. Guidelines should be easily understood. The incentive program plan will be an exposition of Total Quality Schools philosophy. Rewards shall be of significant value to the division and campus. The proposed accountability system is intended to drive fundamental change in classroom teaching by helping schools focus on improved student achievement. The system is designed to encourage and support school improvement by: a Clearly establishing the Districts Goals for schools and students\n Creating an easy way to communicate to schools and the public how well a school is performing\na Recognizing and rewarding schools for their effectiveness in demonstrating growth in student achievement\nand a Focusing attention, energy, and resources on those schools that need help improving student achievement.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 11 LRSD VALUE ADDED QUALITY INDEX The index that follows has been designed to visually illustrate the accountability process\nand, therefore, serves as a living index, subject to periodic review and modification. It will be analyzed by qualified statisticians to ensure fairness and validity before being implemented. INDICATOR Student Achievement ________________________________ DEFINmON___________________________________ Academic success as measured by standardized test scores, number of students selecting high level academic courses and advanced placement course, grade distributions, and grade point average (gpa). Farh of the following measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline data are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubric below. School goals are based on annual benchmarks under each baseline category. Incentive awards are based on minimum/maximum point scale below._____________________________________ ________________MEASUREMENTS_______________ 1. % of students scoring at readiness or above on EPSF posttest (includes high school kindergarten classes)______ 2. % of students in math and/or reading scoring on or above grade level as measured by first grade reading/math inventory posttest, fourth quarter District CRTs, and SAT-9 at grades 3, 5, 7, 8, and 10_________________ 3. % of total senior class taking the ACT prior to graduation__________________________________ 4. % of total senior class taking the ACT with a composite score of 21 or higher_______________________________ 5. % of students enrolled in higher level courses earning a semester grade of C\" or above______________________ K-6 7-9 10-12 INCENTIVE POINTS* X X X X X X X X 6. % of total student population enrolled in AP classes X 7. % of students scoring a 3 or better on AP exams______ 8. % of student population successfully completing college core courses and eligible for unconditional college admission________________________________________ X X STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: SCHOOL GOALS RUBRIC 1998-2001 CURRENT BASELINE 3-YEAR GROWTH STANDARD BENCHMARKS* 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001_ 0 - 24% 25 - 49% 50-74% 20% 15% 10% 75 - 99% NonAdmatn growth rtgaired mag 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% agg 6.6% 6.6% 6.6% mag 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% agg 5% 5% 5% mag 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% JSS_ 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% * minimum acceptable growth = mag\nannual growth goal = agg INDICATOR Drop Out Rate ______________________________ DEFINITION_____________________________________ Percentage of students dropping out in Grades 7-12 from October of one school year through October of the next school vear Each of the following measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline data are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubnc below. School goals are based on annual benchmarks under each baseline cateeorx' Incentive awards are based on minimum/maximum point scale below.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 12 MEASUREMENTS K-6 7-9 X 10-12 X INCENTIVE POINTS* Annual Dropout Report X X Annual October 1 Enrollment Report DROP OUT RATE: SCHOOL GOALS RUBRIC 1998-2001 CURRENT DROPOUT RATE 3-YEAR GROWTH _______STANDARD_______ BENCHMARKS* 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001_______ 6 - 10% 2 - 5% 1% NonAibmuB - growth retmh-ed mag .65 .65 .65 agg 1.3 1.3 1.3 mag. .50 .50 .50 agg 1.0 1.0 1.0 INDICATOR Student Attendance _____________________________________DEFINITION____________ Student Average Daily Attendance divided by Average Daily Membership Each of the following measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline data are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubric below. School goals are based on annual benchmarks under each baseline category. Incentive awards are based on minimum/maximum point scale below._____________________________________ ________________MEASUREMENTS____________ Annual average of the four quarterly reports or annual report K-6 7-9 10-12 INCENTIVE POINTS* STUDENT ATTENDANCE: SCHOOL GOALS RUBRIC 1998-2001 CURRENT STUDENT ATTENDANCE RATE 3-YEAR GROWTH STANDARD BENCHMARKS* 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001__ 86 - 90% 91 -94% 95 - 100% 5% 1% NGiB^qrani' growth reqatrtd mag 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 mag .16 .16 .16 .33 .33 .33 X X X INDICATOR Teacher Attendance DEFINITION *Teacher Average Daily Attendance divided by 'Average Daily Membership *Teacher = anyone paid on the teacher salary schedule **Avera^e Daily Membership = total number of teachers during a 9.25 month teacher contract Each of the followmg measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline data are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubric below. School goals are based on annual benchmarks under each baseline category. Incentive awards are based on minimum/ma.ximum point scale below.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 13 ________________MEASUREMENTS________________ Teacher Attendance Report to be developed by Information Services and distributed quarterly K-6 7-9 I 10-12 INCENTIVE POINTS* TEACHER ATTENDANCE: SCHOOL GOALS RUBRIC 1998-2001 CURRENT TEACHER ATTENDANCE RATE 3-YEAR GROWTH STANDARD BENCHMARKS* 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 88 - 92% 93 - 96% 97 - 100% 5% 1% mag .08 .08 .08 1.6 1.6 1.6 mag .16 .16 .16 agg .33 .33 .33 Nd ratnimBm growth rettahrtd X X X INDICATOR Customer Service DEFINITION Percentage of satisfactory responses for the business community in the Little Rock area. Each of the following measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline dau are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubric below. School goals are based on annual benchmarks under each baseline category. Incentive awards are based on minimum/maximum point scale below._____________________________________ _______________MEASUREMENTS Customer Service Surveys (will be designed)__________________ K-6 7-9 10-12 INCENTIVE POINTS* CUSTOMER SERVICE: SCHOOL GOALS RUBRIC 1998-2001 % OF SATISFACTORY RESPONSES 3-YEAR GROWTH STANDARD BENCHMARKS* 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 25 -49% 50 - 74% 75 - 99% 15% 10% Namtainam - growth rtqaired mag 2.5 2.5 2.5 agg 5.0 5.0 5.0 mag 1.65 1.65 1.65 ags. 3.3 3.3 3.3 X X X INDICATOR School Climate _____________________________________DEFINITION___________________________ School climate Is the perceptions, *behavior and motivations which effect academic success. *Expecied behavior is out of school suspension tree in accordance with the LRSD Policy. Each of the following measurement results is evaluated based on current baseline in individual schools. Baseline data are categorized by percentage quartiles on rubric below. School goals arc based on annual benchmarks under each baseline catceorv. Incentive awards are based on minimum/maximum point scale below._____________________________________ MEASUREMENTS COE Survey________________________________ Annually Measured by Quarterly Discipline Report VIPs Report________________________________ K-6 X X X --9 I 10-12 X X X X .X INCENTIVE POINTS*Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 14 Technical Assistance The basic framework for staff development and technical assistance will be Total Quality Schools. The training components are categorized under four headings and sequences. 1. POLICIES/PARAMETERS, TEAMING, INCENTIVE AWARDS, AND TOTAL QUALITY SCHOOLS TOOLS Policy/Parameters would be taught in a joint session that would be more informational and less interactive. We would anticipate that this would be provided to the campus principals and District administrators in the summer of 1998. There would an informational session presented to the campus staff prior to the election of the campus teams in the fall of 1998. Further informational and training sessions would be scheduled and modified as needed after the initial evaluation had been completed. 2. TEAMING The areas to be reviewed and skills acquired would be empowerment, change process, consensus building, conflict resolution, needs assessment, data analysis, and the hows and whys of how teams produce high performance among students and staff. Training would be offered at multiple times based on the appointment and election of new team members. Initial training would be during the winter of 1998-99. 3. INCENTIVE PROGRAM The incentive program rewards campuses and divisions of the school district for improvement based on quality indicators. Note the listing of the indicators in achievement gains in the third component in this section. The session will deal with specific strategies that may be utilized to increase campus performance. The training will be first developed with campus and District staff and customized to be presented during the summer of 1999 to campus teams at the Cluster Meetings. Cluster meetings will be scheduled at the end of July for the campus teams to offer specific training based on the campus teams needs assessment.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 15 4. TOTAL QUALITY SCHOOLS Training will be provided to all staff of the school district based on four specific components. Little Rock School District bases the Quality Schooling Process on the beliefs that:  Continuous improvement is the goal for which every campus and division strives.  Continuous training and education for all personnel must be provided.  Customer satisfaction is gained by conformance to customer requirements.  Decisions must be data driven. The training would be developed initially with the District administrators and partnered with area businesses that adopted the total quality precepts. We envision that the training would start with administrators and teams in the summer of 1999. Staff of the school district would begin in the fall of 1999 and continue through the next two years. FIRST YEAR - PLAN SECOND YEAR - DO Where are we going? How are we going to get there? Who will be trained? What do we want to accomplish? Organize teams Building teams Training the teams Sound Research Professional reading/collection Basic Education Stages of change Total Staff inservices Understanding and building consensus Quality check for success More technical assistance Compile notebooks________________ TQS Foundation for Leaders/teams Quality training Cadre of teams in each building Retreat for teams Data Driven Training for board members THIRD YEAR - STUDY FOURTH YEAR - ACT Study the results See if the theory works To fully implement the improvement Recommendations for continuous improvement Ongoing evaluationPDM Matrix - Cluster D Sub Group I o n 73 fC o o Stair Development OQ 5  3 - I ft 3 Bl o. 3-  FUNCTION District Staff Development DISTRICT  Communicate federal, state, and district guidelines to all campuses  Allocate resources  Provide training for professional, paraprofcssional, and substitute staff  Desegregation mandates  Quality Control  Communicate and plan calendar in a timely maimer  Ongoing staff development for ESP  Provide national staff development handbooks for all campuses COLLABORATION  Identify appropriate times for content area training for new teachers  Ongoing staff training  Permanently assigned substitutes assigned to same building to acconunodate campus needs for the school year  A. M. staff development monthly  Training and handbook provided for substitutes and new teachers CAMPUS  Waiver for staff development days for new campus programs ACCOUNTABILITY o c*. 3 s S- 3 = . I/l Z. U) ii d I 3 o fO s \u0026lt; o Campus Staff Development * increase communication throughout district among administrators/lcaders/ teachers  Quality control  Campus staff development plan will correlate with COE/SIP/Tcchnology planPDM Matrix - Cluster D Sub Group II -o n New Teacher Induction \u0026amp; Staffing FUNCTION New Teacher Acclimation DISTRICT Provide staff development to new teachers on LRSD curriculum. Allocate resources. Inform campus administrators of mentor and induction year requirements and concepts. COLLABORATION Plan implementation monitoring and evaluation. Confirm mentor teachers. Provide training and guidelines for mentor teachers. CAMPUS Instruct new teachers in all campus policies and procedures. ACCOUNTABILITY SlatTing Provide a qualified pool of applicants. Develop a date-specific timeline to ensure all staff are hired and in place in a timely manner. IJirc a pool of applicants Io be placed in openings as they occur. Benefits and salary administration. Fulfillment of legal and contractual requirements. Determine appropriate starring needs for program implementation, i.e., new hires, additional staff, and reconfiguration of teacher to pupil ratio in the primary grades. Identify need based on course offerings and student enrollment. Interview and recommend from qualified pool. Assign teachers in their area of certification. o o 'S 3 b ZiH I (fQ 8.8- c?. 2:5 n S O n I I * n o 3 a (APDM Matrix - Cluster I) Sub Group ill \"o n ire o 3 a FUNCTION Schedule Sl Calendar (District and Campus) DISTRICT/STATE Communicate State/District requirements and negotiate parameters. Schedule \u0026amp; Calendar Special Programs \u0026amp; Grouping COLLABORATION Compare and make sure calendars are compatible. CAMPUS Determine internal scheduling of staff and apply for district/state waiver of class or program requirements. ACCOUNTABILITY 73 o n o I ta CL CL CD 9 S' 3 (/) 3 5 C. on S a n I o c (A o' Q  \u0026lt; O (Z) Special Academic Programs (AP, G/T, Spec. Ed., ESL, Title I, Early Childhood) Interpret and communicate mandates (federal, state, local policy) and recommend policy revisions. Agree upon waivers that will enhance student achievement. Initiate waiver and policy revisions in collaboration with campus team. Grouping (Organizational) Interpret and communicate district guidelines/ philosophy. Agree upon any exceptions to District guidelines and philosophy. Utilize flexible iinplcmcnialion of grouping with guidelines.PDM Matrix - Cluster D \"X3 n Sub Group IV (kJ OQ a I a VO M Discipline rb o o I 2 m 3 p ex ex P FUNCTION DISCIPLINE DISTRICT/STATE Review Federal/Stale Mandates COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY rt C. ^.2 3 Eslablish sludenl discipline policies and regulalions wilti slandardized componenis Review handbook revision and make recommendations Discuss and develop plan for disciplinary concerns Develop school-wide discipline plans Dcvclo|)/|)ost chissrooiii rules o 2. li I 1 3 o ra 2 o (A Cominiinicale policies Io DisIrici adminislralors Communicate policies Io patrons Coiniiiiiiiicnle policies Io slalT Teach and implement SRRH Io students Develop and implemenl Iraining for cerliricd/non- certifled stafT (i.e. sccurily, bus drivers, supervision aides, and subsliliile teachers I.RSD SlalT Dcvelopnicnl On-silc sl.-ifT dcvclopincitl Monilor and ensure compliance of policies Monilor and ensure compliance of policies Monilor and ensure compliance of policies Review and submit quarterly disciplinary dataFUNCTION PISTRICT/STATE Provide resources Io implement district-wide disciplinary plan A Alternatives Io suspensions B Student Assistance Program C. In-school Suspension D. Alternative Classrooms E. Alternative Learning Environments Provide Tinancial support for proactive school plans COLLABORATION Discuss and develop positive alternative learning solutions Io behavior problems Provide appropriate curriculum for specific needs relating to behavior problems District collaboration with campuses Io develop business partnerships CAMPUS Adhere Io established LRSD guidelines for administering disciplinary sanctions Tcacli/iiiiplciucnt behavior iiiodificalion and condicl management Develop proactive plan which provides incenlives/rewards for good behavior ACCOUNTABILITY T3 n (w S o M fT p o C! o p \u0026lt; D 1 g s' a o s TO a o o I rt 3 ex o g o' r* \u0026lt;/) O n (/tFUNCTION niSTRICT/STATE ( lIKItIClII.IIM Adopt curriculum to include the following components.  Standards- based objectives  K-12 scope and sequence  Assessment and Instruction framework to reflect national standards and best practices from research (hands-on science, ntath manipulatives and tlicmatlc instruction) PDM MATRIX - CLUSTER E COLLABORATION Serve on district committee to develop:  Standards- based objectives  K-12 scope and sequence  Assessment and Instruction framework Monitor curriculum In the following areas: * Implementatio n District resources Assessment processes Transitions among campuses and between levels Conduct action research on Instructional strategies and programs (Collect and analyze data and make decisions based on II at the building level CAMPUS accountability \"0 n BI UQ  Recommend stalT to develop curriculum. Recommend new programs and/or extensions of existing programs. Use curriculum framework within which classroom teacher decide the following Information:  Use of optional components  Use of enrichment objectives  Design of lesson plan content and activities  Use of assessments within district framework. \u0026gt; Modiflcallon of curriculum for special needs students  Strategies for Instructional delivery within district Damework. a p ex n a 5 Q n o I re 3 s o' 3 [n o IS n ft I a c \u0026lt;/\u0026gt; S' a 3 \u0026lt; (/\u0026gt; DFUNCTION niSTRIC'r/STA'I'E COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY T3 n Curriculum Re.murces Support and facilitate campus plans based on available resources. Define district and campus responsibilities fur materials, resources, and budget allocations. Organize resources at campus for accesslblllly to staff and programs. Delertnine and use resources for campus plan, Involving district personnel as needed. p (fQ a c I T3 a o I 2 P Cl. CL P a s 3- 3 a   3 S S. CZ5 S a JS- O I a g S' n n 3 n (/)FUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY -0 n CD P  n 5 a bJ c n n o I Initruellonal Equity EstabliBh an equity fund. Review assesinient data and move resourcea/ataff to asalat where needed. Create plan to minimize atK-io-eeononilcea that effect achievement. r- 2 n 3 Ca (X ex 3. h: g -b o 3  C. t/l Cl I o U 5* o n 3  . \u0026lt; A (/\u0026gt;FUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS accountability Data Ctdicclion Collect relevant data for diagnostic use for the campus and district.  Student Achievement  Drop out rales  Student attendance data  Teacher attendance data  Customer service Index  School Climate index Provide comparative data oh students, teachers, and Schools. Review/redefine district and campus goals to meet guidelines for data collection. Collect and analyze relevant diagnostics for: Utilization of data to support Individual Improvement plan. Develop plan to collect/revlew data on regular basis rather than annually. Provide current research information. Provide Staff Development on data collection. Individual students School District Planning, Research and Evaluation will work with Individual schools In data collection. Identify multiple data lources. Create time and climate that Is teacher friendly for collection. n p p W 3 ? r-  p 3. o 3- 3^ I I fl I *0 g 3 n a 3 70 a n o I a 3 O. P o 3 (/) o t/1 D n UiFUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITV Data Use \u0026lt;6 Analysis Provide (ethnical aupport. Develop communication plan for campus \u0026amp; district. Involve total stalT lit data analysis and Inform students, parents, and constituents. Use data analysis to drive decision-making for teachers, students, and parents. Use diagnostic tools to evaluate student placement. n o ! pj p ~ 5 rt -3 T3 hi c \u0026lt;T) 3 P 3.  C?. 1 2 S- =\u0026gt; K. Ui S. (n a a \"s S' ?a s. t/l 5 D o I a s' o n 3 n UiFUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY Textbooks Coordinate process and adopt textbooks using approved list. Maintain budget for adopted materials. Create and maintain budget for supplemental materials to be distributed among all schools. Request waivers. Make recommendations for stalling textbook committees. Use multiple committees for: revlew/evaluation of textbooks assure cluster representation Maintain inventory. Consider supplemental resources where appropriate. T3 O .g o! O\\ (/\u0026gt; p o. o - 5' S' \u0026lt; a n I 3* O n 3 \u0026lt; a IZ) X n o o I (Ti CL o  o' XI t/i oFUNCTION Homework DISTRICT/STATE Provide support and resources for campus plan. COLLABORATION Use collected data as the basis for planning. Structure technical assistance and/or availahlc resources to promote continuous Improvement on each campus In student achievement. CAMPUS Structure work of staff and resources to assess Individual and categorical levels of Improvement. Emphasis Is on student achievement. ACCOUNTABILITY Tj n p (W n NJ I T3 C a o o I a 3 P ex O. P CD 2. 2. 2 3' 3 Ei. w a _ 3 5' f\" n I I S' o n 3 \u0026lt;5 t/iFUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY T3 n Grading Develop and follow district policy on grading. Establish district committees to recommend policy, guidelines, evaluation, data (lollccliort, report card!, etc. Interpret and maintain p\u0026lt;dicy at Ilie campus. p R oo on  n o I r~ n n 3 Provide for llexible conference limes Io keep parents abreast of student performance. Eiplore to Include explicit data on atudents' progress.  Review feasibility of mailing Interim reports. The mailing should be to the students that are academically distressed.  Ask parent Io give 3 stamps at the beginning of the program year for mailing purposes Develop a procedure on disiribullon and collection of Interim reports and report cards. StudenO return signed Interim reports. P O- P. P o S. ST. S 2 p' s. co Q n I a U s' o Q 3 \u0026lt;5 (/\u0026gt; aFUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY 7? P UQ c M3 w I n o o I Accountaliilily/Student Achievement Provide support and resources for campus plan. Use collected data as the basis for planning. Structure technical assistance and/or available resources to promote continuous Improvement on each campus In student achievement. Structure work of staff and resources to assess individual and categorical levels of improvement. Emphasis Is on student achievement. r 2 P ex O. P o ff. 2 3- 3 3. VI a - _ o' 3 \"S c- S' ?o S. CZl 5  n I a c tA 3* o O  a (AFUNCTION DISTRICT/STATE COLLABORATION CAMPUS ACCOUNTABILITY Waivers Request waivers from Arkansas Department of Education and/or applicable governmental entity. Consider campus requests for waivers. Assist in evaluation of waiver if and when waiver Is approved. Initiate and Justify requests for waivers which must pnivldc strategies that support evidence of student achievement. o n u (0 a I o O i5 /O a o o I 2 n 3 Q. a. p II I S' n \u0026lt;9 3 n CARecommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 31 Background Information and Question and Answers - Campus Leadership Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. Why was the Campus Leadership system created? The Little Rock School District strategic plan was developed by a combination of staff and community. It was determined that site leadership was a reform movement which should be implemented. The plan is very inclusive based on the membership of not only staff, but parents, community members and business partners. The incentive plan is a positive form of campus accountability which places the emphasis on the group rather than individual. It is believed that rewarding improved student performance and empowering staff at the campuses will result in improved student performance. The overall plan is consistent with rewarding improvement based on the Total Quality precepts. Who developed the incentive system? The original philosophical basis of the plan was developed by Cluster B. The steering committee for the complete plan endorsed the recommended plan. A list of the schools and individuals is located on the last page of this monograph. What are the underlying beliefs of the proposed plan for campus leadership? On the first page of this document there are listed the expected results of moving to a campus leadership plan for the purpose of increased student performance. As such, there is also a strong belief that continuous improvement and total quality performance are major aspects behind the plan. How have campus leadership systems and incentive systems improved student achievement in other districts? School districts in Tennessee, Kentucky, Maryland and Texas have all reported positive gains in student achievement. These states all have statewide plans and they are encouraged to add local incentives. There are other examples but we concentrated on these four states.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 32 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. There are several terms used to describe the campus decision making process. What are the differences? The term Campus Leadership is utilized by the Arkansas Leadership Academy to describe the empowerment process. The Arkansas Leadership Academy was established by the Arkansas Legislature. The terms of sitebased decision making, participatory decision making and campus leadership may be utilized interchangeably. The final document will utilize one term, Campus Leadership. How was the membership of the campus team decided? There was a search of the literature regarding the composition of campus teams in various states. The committee felt that this would be the initial proposal but it could be made smaller or larger based on the evaluation after the implementation years. The committee wanted to be as inclusive as possible. How will the staff and the public be kept informed about this improvement initiative? The school district will report the degree of implementation annually as part of the District Report Card. Particular emphasis will be placed on improvement of the factors identified on the Quality Indicator Index. Campuses will make a similar report based on their individual initiatives and their specific report card. The results of the incentive plan and awards for progress will be reported annually at the beginning of the school year. How will the District measure growth? The District will be looking at the specific quality education indicators to measure a schools performance for incentive awards. The emphasis will be on improvement in student performance. We will look at the growth which occurred during the academic year. A student must be enrolled as of October 1 to be calculated in the growth index. Will special education students be part of the assessment? Yes, but we have not developed all the rules regarding required growth. We anticipate the special education students will be added the 2*** year of the plan.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 33 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Why is the District considering mobility when measuring the growth of students: Research of student mobility maintains that: a) changing schools has a negative effect on an individual students learning\nand b) highly mobile student populations adversely affect overall school and District performance. As both the nation and the states address issues such as school choice, curriculum reform, and accountability systems for schools and districts, the impact of student mobility must be taken into account. Why are students not being considered part of the plan who are enrolled prior to October 1? Several of the District schools have extremely high mobility rates and many times we are testing students who have not been part of the Little Rock instructional program. The students will be tested, but will not be part of the accountability measure which qualifies the campus for an incentive award. What tests will be used to assess student achievement gains? The District will utilize the state norm referenced test as one of the measures. We also will utilize criterion reference assessments, which will indicate mastery of the basic and grade level skills. What are Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs)? Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs) are tests designed by textbook publishers and others to measure the degree in which a student has met previously established standards. The level of expectation is based on the grade level and by academic core subject. What are Norm Referenced Tests (NRTs)? Norm Referenced Tests compare the performance of Little Rock students to the performance of students nationally. The Stanford 9 is currently being used by the State for this purpose.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 34 15. 16. 17. 18. Why are dropout rates and student attendance being included in the formula? Dropout rates and student attendance were selected, because of the consistent and accurate manner in which they are collected for each school. Although campuses do not have total control over these factors, data from research studies show that dropout rates decrease and attendance rates increase when appropriate classroom instruction and supportive school environment address the diverse needs of students. What other measures will be utilized? Arkansas has a very low college attendance rate. The emphasis on the ACT and college preparatory program will assist more of the Districts young people to qualify for college entrance. This will also assist in preparing more of the Districts students to qualify for higher level jobs in the future. Why was School Climate and Customer Service indexes used? A positive school climate is directly related to the quality and amount of learning that takes place on the campus. We ail are customers to some degree of the public education institution. Having knowledge of the perceptions of the customers and particularly those who employ the Districts students can be an excellent school improvement strategy. Who are the customers or stakeholders? Essentially, everyone who is in any way connected with the school organization is a customer. Students and their parents are the most obvious customers, but they are not the only customers. A student is the customer of the education system, the individual school and individual teachers. The teachers, as well as all other staff members, and even volunteers are also customers. For example, a third grade teacher is the customer of a second grade teacher, or junior level courses and instructors are customers of prerequisite sophomore level courses and instructors. As well, a middle school is the customer of an elementary school and a high school is a customer of a middle school, just as business and community are customers of the entire school system.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 35 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. How can schools appeal decisions pertaining to their growth? An appeals process will be established that will enable campuses to appeal various issues to the Superintendent. Issues that could serve as the basis of the appeal might be: missing the award by a fraction\nschool grade-level reconfiguration\nhaving an extremely small number of students in a category, etc. Will schools be expected to demonstrate improvement? Each school will be expected to show growth. Schools whose achievement is below that of the expected norm will be placed on Warned Status and offered technical assistance. If improvement is not forthcoming the school will be placed on Probationary Status. Technical assistance with full evaluation of the school will be accomplished to assist the campus. Recognized educators will also be asked to consult with the campus staff. What happens if student achievement is still below expected norms and with little or no growth in student achievement? The school will be a candidate for reconstitution. Who will set the norms for expected improvement? A committee of teachers, parents, administrators and technical experts will establish reasonable standards for each of the areas identified by the Quality Indicator Index. Expected growth will also be calculated by identifying and quantifying the difference between where a school is currently with the expected standard for each area. The Board of Directors will have final authority to establish the standard and expected growth rate. Is the development of the campus leadership plan and the incentive plan finalized? This is a draft report and we anticipate additions and corrections to the current plan. The response form will be utilized to gain additional input prior to recommending the plan to the Board of Directors for approval. The plan calls for an in-depth evaluation to be completed after the 3\"* year of operation. When will the incentives be available for distribution to the schools? The first incentives will be distributed to schools during the 1999-2000 school year.Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 36 Campus Leadership Response Form Name: Gender. Male___Female^ School Race: White (Name is not required) Black__Hispanic__Asian___Native American__Other___ Please indicate the primary group to which you belong or wish to be identified. Teacher___Other School Employee___Parent Student Business Representative___Community Citizen____ Note\nyou may give comments in the area below each question. Please be specific. 1. Using a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means the quality of education is very poor and 5 means the quality of education is excellent, how would you rate the quality of education in Little Rock Schools? Very Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent Comments/Altematives (Please print) 2. Do you agree or disagree that the proposed plan for campus leadership/participatory decision making will encourage improvement in student achievement within the Little Rock School District? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print)Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 37 3. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended Quality indicators will fairly measure learning occurring in the school district? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Aeree Comments/Altematives (Please print) 4. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended incentives will encourage improvement in student achievement in our schools? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print) 5. Do you agree or disagree that the recommended corrective action will help schools improve? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print) 6. Do you agree or disagree that every school should be expected to show continual growth? Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print)1 Recommendations for LRSD Campus Leadership Initiative/Campus Incentives Page 38 7. Do you agree or disagree that clear parameters for campus decision making should be part of the campus leadership plan? Disagree 4 5 2 1 J Comments/Altematives (Please print) Agree 8. Do you agree or disagree that high priority should be given to the technical assistance and communication? Disagree 4 5 2 1 3 Agree Comments/Altematives (Please print) 9. What one comment concerning the proposed campus leadership / participatory decision making plan \u0026amp; proposed incentive system would you make? Thank you for responding. Please return by June 20,1998, to: Little Rock School District ATTN\nSuperintendents Office 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201dr RECF Little Rock School District September 29, 1998 OCT 2 1998 OFFICE OF desegregation monitoring MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Mrs. Anne Brown, Desegration Monitoring Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services SUBJECT: Campus Leadership Thank you and your staff for all you have done to help the Little Rock School District move toward the 21* Century. Your support is appreciated and needed at such a critical time in the Districts progress. In my new position. Associate Superintendent of School Services, I am responsible for the implementation of the Campus Leadership Initiative. The School Services Department is also chairing the following clusters: Cluster Cluster C Cluster E _________Title Quality Index - Attendance \u0026amp; At-Risk Campus Leadership - Planning and Campus Goals Time/Date November 17, 1998 1:30 - 3:30 p.m. November 18, 1998 1:30-3:30 p.m. We would be most appreciative if you could provide technical assistance from your staff on each committee. The next round of cluster meetings will start in November. If you will submit names to me prior to the meeting, I will personally contact each one of them. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Cc: Brady Gadberry, Special Assistant to the Superintendent Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation 810 West Markham street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)824-2000 J Little Rock School District November 16, 1998 Administrative Directive TO: All Principals FROM: SUBJECT: '^^Victor Anderson, Associate Superintendent, Operations C^Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent, School Services Documentation of Involvement of Campus Leadership Team and School Community in the Development of New Work Project Lists During the November cluster meetings, principals will receive a memo from the Director of Facility Services requesting that schools review and revise lists of existing requests for new work for the school facility. This revised list will become the basis for projects for a millage campaign next fall. Review the existing lists carefully and delete any requests that are no longer desires. Add any requests for additions, modifications, or renovations to the school. These lists will not include requests for repairs. Those items that cannot be funded in the current fiscal year will be developed into another list at the Facility Services Department and will also be added to the list of projects for the millage campaign. The involvement of the Campus Leadership Team and representatives from your school community are critical to this task. Involve both groups in the discussions of which projects are to be included in the project list. Provide documentation to the Operations Division of the names of the individuals and their positions who participate in the decisions of which projects are to be included on the revised new work list. Be certain to include representatives from your PTA and from other support groups or organizations within your school community. If there is an active neighborhood association in your area, a representative from that group is also recommended for participation. At the high school level, student representatives are appropriate for participation. Return the revised new work lists to Mr. Eaton on or before December 14, 1998. Send the documentation of the participants in the project decisions to the Operations Division on the same date. Attachment C: Doug Eaton Frances Cawthon Marian Lacey 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 * / MEMORANDUM FACILITY SERVICES DIRECTORATE DATE: November 13,1998 TO: II Pnncip^l^nd Building Managers FROM: lOI IS . Eaton, Director of Facility Services SUBJ: New Work Lists Attached to this memorandum is a current listing of the new work projects that our records indicate we have received from your site. You are requested to review this listing, delete any items that you feel are no longer needed at the school, and submit work orders for any new work that you desire to be considered in new work planning sessions for possible funding the latter part of this year. New work consists of additions, modifications, or renovations to facilities that do not exist at this time, submitted at this time. Items needing repair or maintenance are not to be Please review your academic program to ensure that the facilities that you have meet the needs of your program now and in the future. These are the type projects that we are trying to identify as new work. Consideration should also be given support facilities such as driveways, parking lots, and play areas. You are requested to forward any new work requests to Facility Services by December 14, 1998. DCE/apl/newwork3Cl- received JUL 1 9 2000 OFRCEOF desegregation MOffiTORIHG LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Campus Leadership Institute 2000 Sessions I \u0026amp; II, July 24-28, 2000 *List of Participants School: MITCHELL Name of Participant Address (include city/zip) Phone Number Position (Principal, Teacher, Parent, Broker, Business Partner, etc.) Mr. Darian Smith Ms. Alice Bradberry Ms. Patricia Brooks Ms. Kimberly Potter Ms. Veta Flanagan Mr. Rickey Jackson Ms. Connie Whitfield Ms. Sue Walls 3909 Cobb Little Rock, Ar 72204 2106 Raintree, Bryant Ar. 72022 1701 Westpark Dr. Apt 21 Little Rock, Ar 72204______________________________ 15 Lendl Loop Little Rock, 72207 6305 Longwood Rd., Little Rock, 72207 3434 S. Battery Little Rock, 72206 3023 S. Battery, Little Rock, 72206 3300 Foxcroft Little Rock, 72227 *Maximum number on team including principal - 8 565-3961 847-6018 663-2431 614-6656 614-6656 374-2130 372-0693 224-7266 Principal Teacher Counselor Teacher Teacher Parent Community Broker01/03/2001 16: 05 5016716207 HALL HIGH PAGE 02 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 6700 H STREET little ROCK, AR 72205 VERNON SMITH, JR. PRINCIPAL (501) 671-6200 PHONE (501) 671-6207 FAX January 3,2001 Dear Mrs. Powell, T an exceUent job with our Campus Leadership Team. I realize that this  was not part of you regular duties, and you acceded this task on such short notice. Your service is greatly appreciated by the Campus Leadership Team and I am truly thankful for your assistance. me. Sincerely, Vernon Smith, Jr.MITCHELL ACADEMY RECEIVED 2000-2001  JUL 19 ZWO tXREE'QF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED BY DARIAN L. SMITHIntervention: Great Expectations of Arkansas Actions L Staff will attend the Great Expectations Summer Institute Person(s) Responsible Principal Staff Timeline July 2000 Resources x-i\nJ)i^trict {Budget Title 1 I APIG/Other BudgeG Budget J Parent Workshop/Conferences for students having behavioral difficulties The Family Support Team will meet weekly to identify students that need additional assistance. Institute a Friday Club Day to involve students in extra-curricular activities Implement the Getting Along piece of Success For All Staff will have a quarterly retreat/celebration gathering Principal Counselor Family Support Team Success For All Facilitator Principal Counselor Principal SFA Facilitator Principal Program Committee On-going On-going Bi-monthly August 2000 On-going Great Expectations Handbook GE Offices Parenting videos Speakers Success For All materials Staff SFA materialsSchool: Mitchell Academy School Improvement Plan Year: 2000-2001 Priority 3: Improve the overall climate of the school. Supporting Data: School Climate Survey Goal(s): . Reduce the number of send homes and out-of-school suspensions to 5 /o. Build better staff cohesiveness. One-Year Benchmark(s): In 1998-99 Mitchell Academy had a send home and out-of-school suspension rate of 8.1%. We shall reduce our suspension rate to 5%.Intervention: Hiring a Curriculum Specialist 'Actions i Personas) r Responsible Timeline Resources Develop a series of parent workshops to teach parents how to assist their children with schoolwork. Curriculum Specialist Counselor Family Support Team September 2000 February 2001 April 2001 V I  i -  i IRC Staff Current Research Videos District: Budget 1 Title 1 vfiudgct 1.-----L. $500 Provide students opportunities to respond to open-ended questions. Classroom teachers August 2000 - June 2001 TERC materials IRC Staff ACTAAP released items APIG/Othcr Budget  Implement the use of a daily math problem. Design schoolwide incentives for improvement. Monitor and make adjustments in the plan as necessary to ensure improvement before the April Benchmark examinations Conduct summative evaluation of the plans implementation, make adjustments for following year. Classroom teacher September 2000 - May 2001 IRC Staff Workbook Campus Leadership Team Principal Cuniculum Specialist Classroom teachers August 2000 Ongoing $500 i Campus Leadership Team June 2001School: Mitchell Academy School Improvement Plan Year: 2000-2001 Priority 2: Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics 83%ofthTfourth grade students scored at the below basic level on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. 130/0 of the fourth grade students scored at the basic level on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. 7% of the fifth grade students scored at or above the 50th percentile on the SAT9. HXm of the students will perform at or above the proficient level on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. 90% of the students will perform at or above the proficient level in Mathematics each semester on the District adopted CRTs. 65% of the students will perform at or above the 50th percentile in Mathematics on the SAT9. One-Year Benchmark(s): 1999-2000 Mitchell Academy shall improve 10 points so that at least In 14% of the students (4% - 1998-99 performance + 10% - required improvement - 14%) at or having 7 students out of a possible 43 students score at ZX proficiXf1X1 on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. This Benchmark will be achieved by or above the proficient level. In 2000-2001 Mitchell Academy shall improve 7 points so that at least required improvement = 14%) at or above the 50th percentUe on the SAT9. of a possible 46 students score at or above the 50th percentile on the SAT9. 14% of the students (7%- 2000-2001 performance + 7% -\nThis Benchmark will be achieved by having 7 students outBenchmark examinations. Conduct summative evaluation of the plans implementation, make adjustments for following year. Campus Leadership Team June 2001Intervention: Success For All Actions\nAssign tutors to the bottom 30% of first grade students. f Person (s) y Responsible  Principal SFA facilitator SFA tutor I Timeline  V\". Resources  t District  \u0026lt; J Budget Budget ,\niAPIG/Ofher I Biidgef\u0026gt; September 2000 - June 2001 SFA placement exam data Provide tutoring for an additional 100 students. Principal SFA facilitator Classroom teachers October 2000 - May 2001 VIPs Young Lawyers Association Develop a series of parent workshops to teach parents how to assist their children with schoolwork. Counselor Family Support Team SFA facilitator September 2000 February 2000 April 2000 IRC Staff Videos SFA Assessment $500 Implement cooperative learning strategies to encourage a linkage between teacher-directed instruction and child-centered learning. _____ Principal SFA facilitator August 2000 - June 2001 SFA Assessment Early Learning Manual Self-Assessment Checklist Enhance the implementation of the Success For All reading program through staff development_______ Principal SFA facilitator Ongoing IRC Staff Title 1 Provide students opportunities to be assessed on a bi-weekly basis using open-ended questions. Design schoolwide incentives for improvement. Monitor and make adjustments in the plan as necessary to ensure improvement before the April Classroom teachers August 2000 - June 2001 ACTAAP released items Campus Leadership Team August 2000 $500 Principal Classroom teachers OngoingSchool: Mitchell Academy School Improvement Plan Year: 2000-2001 Priority 1: Improve Student Achievement in Reading Supporting Data: tUp hplnw basic level on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. 52% of the fourth grade students scored at the below basic levei on uiv gia 35% of the fourth grade students scored at the basic level on the grade 4 Benchnrark Exam. 4% of the fifth grade students scored at or above the 50th percentile on the SAT9. Goal(s): 100% of the students will perform at or above the proficient level on the grade 4 Benchmark Exam. the District adopted CRTs. 90% of the students a perform at or above the profieient\" level in reading each semester on 65% of the students will perform at or above the 50th percentile in reading on the SAT9. One-Year Benchmark(s): p., students fl3% . 1998 -99 performance + 9% - having 10 students out of a possible 43 students score at or above the proficient level. having 'rXX of a possible 46 students score at or above the 50th percentlie.Arkansas Democrat .^(fjazclk  MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1998 LR student achievement plan put forth \u0026gt; BY CYNTHIA HOWELL   ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE\n-The Little Rock School Board will vote this week on a proposal to establish teams of staff, parents and community members to help improve student achievement. -ff adopted by the board, the tvvo-paragraph policy will be the first step in an effort to make schools more independent. Besides the campus leadership teams, the idea includes:  Training for staff and parents.  Quality indicators to evaluate J schools. Board  Continued from Page 18 administrators, principals teachers later in the month.  Rewards to schools where students progress beyond minimum levels,  Corrective measures if a school doesnt meet expectations. The Campus Leadership Initiative is similar to site-based management or shared decision-making plans, that have become a relatively common element of school reform across the country. We have never really made such a drastic change like this, Assistant Superintendent Sadie Mitchell said last week. Its important that people fully understand what our goal is, and that is to increase student achievemenL Teachers and parents will have a greater role in the success or failure of a school as a result of the initiative, Mitchell said. At the same time, central office administrators and principals will have to adjust to changes in their roles in tlie operation of a school. The School Board will vote for the first time on the formation of the leadership teams at its meeting 6 p.in. Thursday. [The teams] will assist in the development and evaluation of campus goals and objectives through planning, budgeting, curriculum development, staff development and staffing needs. the proposed policy says. Tlmough consensus-based decisions, the campus teams will support the districts commitment to the sustained improvement of schools. If the policy is approved on its first reading, the board would likely vote on the proposal a second time in July, which would make the policy official and enable the district to begin training about 200 See BOARD,Page 38 and The summer training will focus on team building, how to reach consensus. how to assess a schools needs and an introductory session on a system for efficient and effective operations. Each school should have a campus leadership team in place by Nov. 1, according to the proposed leadership initiative developed by administrators and teachers during the past several months. the recommendations of their teams. \"If they dont, what we will get is ineffective teams whose members wont want to work together and will consider this just anotlier case where the top is going to do what they want anyway, Mitchell said. That is not what we want. Its OK for parents and the community to be involved in schools, she added. A lot of times they can see the quality we are aspiring for much better than we can. Each team, which will meet at least four times a year. It will focus on the schools improvement plan. revising it if necessary and deciding how to accomplish its objectives, Each school will be evaluated based on indicators that include stu- dent achievement. attendance. dropouts. teacher attendance, customer sendee and school climate. Each school will be assigned points for progress made in each categoiy and rewarded if progress is sufficient. The School Board is being asked to include $225,000 in the 1998-99 budget for the incentive rewards. Mitchell said. The point system will be developed with the help of outside consultants, she added. Still to be decided is what will happen to schools that dont make acceptable progress. Mitchell said. The Campus Leadership Initia- Mitchell said. The work of the team  five, or site-based decision making, will likely include deciding what was first envisioned for Little Rock staff training and other resources in 1995 by a committee that helped are needed, setting time lines to develop the districts five-year reach goals and even obtaining strategic plan for operation, waivers from district and state regu- That strategic plan and the eflations if those regulations hinder forts to design a site-based manage- c u._.---1- ment plan were set aside for more For example, Mitchell said, a than a year because of a change in team might decide it w'ould be best superintendents and a concentra- to reduce the number of faculty po- tion on revising the school districts sitions by one or two and use sav- desegregation plan. , ings to purchase materials for an af- dents and noncertified staff members ter-school program for students The initiative, which is much broader and more detailed than the proposed policy to be considered this week, will be submitted for school board approval later this year. Five to 10 certified teachers will ef- be elMted by the school staff to serve the school from reaching its goals, on the leadership team at each ~ ............................. school The principal, who will be the team chairman, will appoint two parents, a business representative and a community member to the team. Stu- Mitchell said work resumed on also may become team members, ei- ther by election or appointment One Or a team may e.xpress concerns to a principal about the job performance central office administrator will of a staff member, ICtchell said, serve on the team to provide training the site-based management plan earlier this year with encouragement fi-om Superintendent Les Carand to serve as the schools liaison to the administration. Team members will serve two-year terms. The team will actually be an ad- Those kinds of things will come up, and they will be discussed.\" Mitchell said. Ultimately, it will be nine, who was out of his office this week and couldnt be reached for comment on the proposed policy. ------- Virtually eveiy principal and up to the principal to carry through teacher representatives from each , . , , ,\nWith the teacher, but I think there school assisted with the develop- visoty body to the school pnncipal. will be a little more fire power be- ment of the leadership initiative but Mitchell said the principals will hind the principal with a team and plans for staff and parent train- be strongly encouraged to consider pushing him on. ing, Mitchell saidArkansas Democrat W(?\u0026gt;azcllc  THURSDAY, JULY 29. 1999 LR school teams meet to set achievement goals Parents, teachers and staff gang up on problems BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DrMCXTRAT-CAZErni schools went through the same exercises. Charged with improving student achievement at their schools, XU uciwccil Uia-teacher and parent members of cussions on aligning curriculum the Little Rock School Districts - The atmosphere Wednesday was lightliearted. In between disand student tests and on coping with different personality types, -- --------------------- educators and community mem-getner to set and meet school bers snacked on salsa, chips and goals.---------------------------------------------watermelon. new campus leadership teams are learning this week how to work to- On Wednesday, more than 200 They watched skits performed district employees, community by administrators and vied for members and parents who form door prizes of School District cof-the core of their school teams fee mugs and restaurant gift cer-gathered at the Greater Second tificates. They watched skits performed B a*p1t isrt Churc--h-- i-n-- -S-o--u-t-h--w---eBsty L Fitrtlieday, each school team Kock for the session that wont should have the skills and materi-conclude until Friday afternoon, als necessary to train the rest of Earlier this week, another group their teams and the school staff of 180 from district elementary See GOALS, Page 2B 3. Zl i\n. Arkansas Damocral-Gazelle/STEPHEN B. THORNTON Hall High ScIimI A^istant Principal Judy Zink (left) and tteeaacchheerrss aanrxdl pprriinncciippaallss VWVeeddnneessddaayy aafftteerrnnoooonn iinn LLiilllliiee RRoocckk,. leacher Joan Best (right) place a paper collage of hands in During an opening exercise, team members wrote personal the center of their table during a Iraining session for parents, teaching attributes and then combined them symbolically. Goals.  Continued Irom Page IB members who arent here, said Sadie Mitchell, associate superintendent for school services. \"And, each team will have established at least one example of a goal for tlieir school. Tliey will have identified the tasks that would go along with the goal, the staff members who are responsible for tlie tasks and they will have set time Jines for the (asks, and a budget.\" Mitchell cited team work done by Dodd Elementary School earlier this week as an example of the kinds of work all the teams will do. The Dodd team agreed that one of its goals for the year should focus on improving reading skills among students. To do tliat, the number of employees who have been trained in the states literacy program for elementary students should be increased by five. Victor Anderson, the districts associate superintendent for operations, told tlie crowd that in a school year in which middle schools are being established to replace junior highs and ninth-graders arc moving into the high schools, it will be the new campus leadership teams that will bring about the greatest degree of change in the day-to-day operations of the schools. The campus leadership plan is the districts effort to decentralize school management. The teams were formed in Noventber 1998 either through princi* pal appointment or through election. The teams advise the scliool principal on issues such as student achievement, curriculum, budgeting, use of staff and staff training. Each school will be responsible for meeting state and district accountability slandaixls that focus on student achievement, graduation rales and attendance, among /r is II teamwork issue. You can organize for success.   Les Camiiic other indicators. Schools that make progress toward the goals will be rewarded, while those that dont face state sanctions. The campus teams range in size from about 10 to as many as 22 at Central High, the districts largest school. The teams have met periodically since their formation but the Iraining sessions (his week are intended to help them focus on the issues that are must important for improving student achievement. Bonnie Ixcsiic, associate superintendent for instruction, told the group Wednesday that \"if you teach the kids the tested curriculum, they will do better. Leslie said it is important that the teams set and strive for goals that mailer. She warned that campus leadership teams have not always been successful, according to research, because some teams never gel beyond discussing park-teaching attributes and then combined them symbolically. ing problems or the color of paint to be used in tlie teacher's lounge. The kids' math scores wont improve that way,\" she said. Instead, the focus must be on curriculum. teacher training, instructional strategics and assessing student achievement, she said. Les Gamine, the district's superintendent, also addressed the (cams Wednesday, describing for them many of the districts accomplishments in 1998-99. Those included an increase in the number of students successfully completing upper-level math courses, a dramatic reduction in the number of students who wore expelled or suspended, a decline in the student drop-out rale, an increase in participation in athletics, and increases in parent and community involvement in the schools as re-flccted in volunteer hours. The state and district accountability standards will require further hnprovemcnls, he said. \"Youve got to plan for that gi'owlh.\" Gamine .said. It is eveiy- Ixxlys re.sjK)n.sibility. It is a teamwork issue. You can organize for success. Ive already shown you tliat the ball is rolling in your favor.\" This past year was a fabulous year and all the indicators for this coming year, which starts Aug. 24, point to an absolutely phenomenal year, he said. Everything is working for us if we can only grab it,\" he said. \"We've waited a long time in this district to rise back up on top. The job is a big one but weve got it going our way.\"\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_768","title":"School lunch program","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","Student assistance programs","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["School lunch program"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/768"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["162 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1,1998 For more information: Zeomee Herts, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District today announces its policy for providing free and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has acopy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party. The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a welfare agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annual 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10,465 14,105 17,745 21385 25,025 28,665 32305 35545 Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual ...873 1,176 1,479 1,783 2,086 2389 2,693 2,996 2(K 272 342 412 482 552 622 692 1, 2, 3. 4. 5, 6 7 8 14,893 20,073 25353 30,433 35,613 40,793 45,973 51,153 Monthly Weekly 1342 1,673 2,105 2,537 2,968 3,400 3,832 4363 287 387 486 586 685 785 885 984 For each additional household member add\nFor each additional household member add: +3,640 +304 +70 +5,180 +432 +100 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfast application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (more)07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 31,1998 Page 2 of 3 food stamp office that a child is a member of a household currently receiving food stamps. School officials will notify households of their eligibility and that the households must notify die school when tliey no longer receive food stamps Households who are notified of their eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notified oftheir eligibility by September 3,1998. AppHcation fonns are being distributed by the school with a letter informing households of the availability of free and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principal s office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the application and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on the application will be used for the purpose of determining eligibility and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any time during the school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss the decision with the determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report (more)07/31/1998 11:17 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 31,1998 Page 3 of 3 increases in household income of over $50.00 per month or $600 per year or decreases in household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if the household size increases, the household should contact the school, Such changes may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. In the operation of the child feeding programs, no child will be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.Irsd.kl2.ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1,1999 For more information: Zeomee Herts, 324-2020 The Little Rock School District today announces its policy for providing free and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has acopy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party. The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a wetfrre agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annua] 1 2 3 45 6 8 10,712 14378 18,044 21,710 25376 29,042 32,708 36374 Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual ...893 1,199 13(M 1,810 2,115 2,421 2,726 3,032 206 277 347 418 488 559 629 700 1. 2. 34 5. 6. 7 8. 15344 20,461 25,678 30395 36,112 41329 46346 51,763 Monthly Weddy 1371 1,706 2,140 2375 3,010 3,445 3,879 4314 294 394 494 595 695 795 896 996 For each additional household member add: For each additional household member add: +3,666 +306.... ... +71 +5^17 M35., +101 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfest application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (mce) 07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 30,1999 Page 2 of 3 food stamp oflBcelhat a child is a member of a household currently receiving food stands. School officials will notify households of their eligibility and that the households must notify the school when they no longer receive food stamps. Households who are notified of fiieir eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notifiedoftheir eligibility by Sqjtcmber 3,1999. Af^cahon fims are being distributed by the school with a letter infbnning households ofdie availability office and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principals office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the ^rplication and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on die application will be used for the purpose of determining eli^bili^ and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any time during the school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss foe decision with foe determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report (more)07/29/1999 13:30 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals July 30,1999 Page 3 of 3 increases in household income of over $50,00 per month or $600 per year or decreases in household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if the household size increases, the household should contact the school. Such chaises may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. In the operation of the child feeding programs, no child will be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, national origin, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, write immediately to the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 01/03 COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT 810 We,st Markham Street  Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 324-2020  FAX (501) 324-2023 www.lrsd.kl2-ar.us District Issues Information for Free and Reduced Price Meals FOR RELEASE AUGUST 1, 2001 For more information: Suellen Vann, 324-2020 The Little Rock School Di strict today announces its poUcy for providing fiee and reduced price meals for children served under the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. Each school and/or the central office has a copy of the policy, which may be reviewed by any interested party- The household size and income criteria identified below will be used to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits. Children from households whose income is at or below the levels shown are eligible for free or reduced price meals. Children who are members of food stamp households are automatically eligible for free meals. Foster children who are the legal responsibility of a welfare agency or court may also be eligible for benefits regardless of the income of the household with whom they reside. Eligibility for the foster child is based on the childs income. FREE MEALS REDUCED PRICE MEALS Household Size Annual 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, 7 8 11,167 ,. 15,093 ,. 19,019 , 22545, 26,871 , 30,797. 34,723. 38,649 . Monthly Weekly Household Size Annual .. 931. 1558. 1585 1,913 2540 2567 2,894 3521 215 291 366 442 517 593 668 744 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 678 15,892. 21,479, 27,066. 32,653 38240 43,827 .49,414 ,55,001 Monthly Weekly 1325 1,790. 2256 2.722 3.187 3653 4.118 4584 .306 ..414 ., 521 .,628 .,736 ..843 ..951 1,058 For each additional household member add\n+3526 +328 +76 For each additional household member add\n+5587 +466 +108 Households that receive food stamps do not have to complete a school lunch or breakfast application. School officials will determine eligibility for free meals based on documentation obtained directly from the (more) 08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PAGE 02/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals August 1, 2001 Page 2 of 3 food stamp office that a child is a member of a household currently recei ving food stamps. School officials will notify households of thcircli gibili ty and that the households must notify the school when they no longer receive food stamps. Households who are notified of their eligibility but who do not want their children to receive free meals must contact the school. Food stamp households should complete an application if they are not notified of their eligibility by September 4,2001. Application forms are being distributed by the school with a letter informing households of the availability of free and reduced price meals for their children. Applications are also available at the principals office in each school. To apply for free or reduced price meals, households must fill out the application and return it to the school. Applications may be submitted at any time during the school year. The information households provide on the application wi 11 be used for the purpose of determining eligibility and verification of data. Applications may be verified at any rime during the .school year by school officials. For school officials to determine eligibility for free and reduced price benefits, households receiving food stamps should only list their childs name and food stamp case number, and an adult household member must sign the application. Households who do not list a food stamp case number must list the names of all household members, the amount and source of the income received by each household member, and the social security number of the adult household member who signs the application. If the adult household member does not have a social security number, the adult household member must indicate that a social security number is not available. The application must be signed by an adult household member. Under the provisions of the free and reduced price policy, the Director of Child Nutrition and the principal of each school will review applications and determine eligibility. Parents or guardians dissatisfied with the ruling of the official may wish to discuss the decision with the determining official on an informal basis. Parents wishing to make a formal appeal for a hearing on the decision may make a request either orally or in writing to: Mrs. Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-2162 Households that list a food stamp case number must report when the household no longer receives these benefits. Other households approved for benefits based on income information must report increases in household income of over $50.00 per month or $600.00 per year or decreases in (more)08/01/2001 11:34 501-324-2023 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS PACE 03/03 LRSD Free/Reduced Price Meals August 1,2001 Page 3 of 3 household size. Also, if a household member becomes unemployed or if ihe household size increases, the household should contact the school. Such changes may make the children of the household eligible for benefits if the households income falls at or below the levels shown. \"In accordance with Federal law and U.S- Department of Argriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on rhe basis of race, color, national orgin, .tex, age, or disability. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.\" JI II /IFree/Reduced Lunch Study 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Enrollment Total F/R % of Enroll '' Black Enroll Black F/R H % of BlackE Non-B Enroll Non-B F/R # % of Non-B 25,231 12,013 48% 16,380 10,172 62% 8,851 1,841 21% \u0026lt;\u0026lt; 24,922 12,352 - 50% 16,564 10,609 64% 8,358 1,743 \u0026gt; 21% ' 24,986 12,644 51% 16,727 10,882 65% 8,259 1,762 - ' 21% 24,886 12,614 51% 16,664 10,825 65% 8,222 1,789 22% 25,070 13,335 53% 16,933 11,507 68% 8.137 1,828 22% 25,190 13,612 54%' 17,097 11,692 68% ,\u0026gt; 8,093 1,920 24%/ 25,525 13,789 - ' 54%y 17,417 11,864 . 68% X 8,108 1,925 \u0026gt; 24% Notes: Row 1 includes tor each school year the total October 1 enrollment. Row 2 includes the total number of students ehgible for free/reduced lunch. Row 3 includes the number of eligible free/reduced lunch students (row 2) divided by the total enrollment (row 1)the percent of the total enrollment that were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program bv rear. Row 4 includes the total number of black students enrolled for each school year, as of October 1. Row 5 includes the number of black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 6 includes the number of black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program (row 3) divided by the total black enrollment (row 4)the percent of the total black enrollment who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 7 includes the total number of non-black students enrolled for each school vear. Row 8 includes the number of non-black students who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Row 9 includes the number of non-black students eligible for the free/reduced lunch program (row 8) divided by tlie total black enrollment for each year (row 7)the percent of the total enrollment of non-black students who were eligible for the free/reduced lunch program for each year. Break-out of Non-Blacks 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 White Hispanic Amer. Ind. Asian Other Total Non-B 1513 125 30 47 126 1841 1413 159 20 70 81 1743 1341 237 44 66 74 1762 1254 I 1258 301 43 66 125 1789 362 22 78 108 1828 1213 437 30 94 146 1920 1109 514 22 106 174 1925April 2 6. 2 0 0 2 i\nLR school lunches to rise by 25 cents ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The price of all meals served to students and adults in the Little Rock School District will increase 25 cents starting next August. The Little Rock School Board approved the new pricing plan Thursday. Elementary school lunches for students will increase for the first time in four years, from $L25 to $1.50. Lunches in ^e middle and high schools will go from $1.50 to $1.75 for students. All adult lunches will go from $2 to $2.25. i-'i--'-X\nJune 24, 2 0 0 5 LR School Board approves increase for student meals ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The price of a school lunch in the Little Rock School District will increase by 50 cents this coming school year, and breakfast prices will increase by 25 cents. The Little Rock School Board approved the increases Thursday on the recommendation of district staff who cited costs  including a 10 percent increase in labor costs this past year  as the reason for the price change. The districts Child Nutrition Department is self -supporting. The last increase in meal prices occurred in the 2002-03 school year. Student lunches will increase to $2 per student at the elementary schools in the 2005- 06 school year and $2.25 at the middle and high schools. Adult lunches will be $2.75. Breakfasts served to both elementary and secondary school students will be $1, and the cost to adults will be $L25. The price increases are expected to generate an additional $340,000 for the school district For the 2004-2005 school year, the district worked with a budget of about $277 million. The School Board for the Pulaski County Special School District earlier this month similarly approved a price increase for school lunches for the 2005- 506 school year from 1.50 to $L75 for students and from $2.50 to $2.75 for adults. Mike Harvey, director of student nutrition in that district, cited increases in the cost of milk and other foods, particularly beef, as well as increased fuel costs as reasons for the price changes. Harvey also cited Act 1220 of 2003, the student nutrition and physical activity act, that resulted in restrictions to the a la carte sales in the cafeterias, costing the district about $100,000. The county district last raised lunch prices in 1998-99. The new increase is expected to generate $250,000 in new income.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1483","title":"\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Standards","Education--Finance","Education--Curricula","School enrollment","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration","Parents","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["\"Strategic Plan (1998 Update), District Information,'' Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1483"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["69 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_721","title":"SWAT visits","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998/1999"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["SWAT visits"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/721"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["224 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nODM 1998 SWAT VISIT SCHEDULE SWAT VISIT TEAMS Team A - Margie and Gene Team B - Melissa and Horace North Little Rock School District Friday, August 21, 1998 Team A Team B 9:00 - 10:30 11:00-12:30 1:30-3:30 Amboy Elementary Lakewood Middle NLR High, East Campus Boone Park Elementary Lakewood Middle NLR High, East Campus Little Rock School District Tuesday - Thursday, August 25, 26, 27, 1998 Team A Team B Tuesday, Aug. 25 9:00-10:30 11:00- 12:30 1:30-3:00 Booker Elementary Wakefield Elementary Hall High Washington Elementary Rightsell Elementary Hall High Wednesday, Aug. 26 9:00 - 10:30 11:00- 12:30 Forest Heights Jr. Bale Elementary Mabelvale Jr. Otter Creek Elementary Pulaski County Special School District Tuesday - Thursday, September 1, 2,3,1998 Team A Team B Tuesday, Sept. 1 9:00-10:30 11:00- 12:30 Mills High Fuller Jr. Mills High Bates Elementary Wednesday, Sept. 2 9:00-10:30 11:00- 12:30 1:30-3:00 Clinton Elementary Harris Elementary Jacksonville Elementary Robinson Jr. Crystal Hill Elementary Oakbrook ElementarySWAT Revisit Schedule Melissa Wednesday, December 2 Bale Hall Robinson Jr. Thursday, December 3 Cloverdale El. Wakefield Bates Mills I Friday, December 4 Boone Park Lakewood Jr. Monday, December 7 Jacksonville El. OakbrookeMemo To: From: Staff Polly Subject: LRSD Meeting Date: August 19, 1998 The LRSD Tea Party is set for 9:30 a m. on Wednesday, September 2. Dr. Gamine, Dr. Bonnie Lesley, and Dr. Katherine Lease will be the ones from LRSD that attend. We have blocked a two- hour timeframe for this meeting. When Ann returns to work, we will discuss and finalize the agenda and plan the details of the meeting. The SWAT visits that were scheduled on September 2 will be done on Monday, August 31. Also, remember that the SWAT visits scheduled for Friday, August 21, have been rescheduled to Monday, August 24..K Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 CP^ September 21, 1998 Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: As I explained when we met on August 31, each fall as the school year gets underway, ODM monitors briefly and informally visit a few schools in all three districts. The observations we make at that time are in the same vein as those of parents, students, and staff as they enter the building to start the new year. That's why we pay attention to the aspects of a school that are most likely to initially impress those entering it, such as the condition of the grounds, building upkeep and cleanliness, displays and furnishings, student and staff conduct, and so forth. This year we dropped in on ten LRSD schools during the first full week of classes\nBale, Booker, Cloverdale, Otter Creek, Rightsell, Wakefield, and Washington Elementaries\nForest Heights and Mabelvale Junior Highs\nand Hall High School. A list of our observations about each school is attached. As I told you last month, overall we were favorably impressed with the condition of the buildings and the many fine preparations for the opening of school that we saw. We intend for these comments to give you, your administrators, and the principals of these buildings the benefit of our impressions. Therefore, as has been our custom, we will not publish or file these observations at this time, although we might eventually factor them into some aspect of a report. I hope the enclosed information is helpful. Please dont hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely yours, S. Brown Enc. cc: Sadie Mitchell Building principalsBale Elementary School We were pleased to note that: An attractive circle drive, decorated with shrubs and trees, led to the entryway. The playground offered shaded areas with appropriate climbing equipment and a basketball court. Despite long years of use, the corridors glistened from floor to ceiling. The small entryway and foyer were warmly and attractively furnished with benches, murals, student photographs, and decorative plants. A large display featuring color photographs of every student dominated one wall in the main area. Almost every wall in the corridors had a freshly painted mural with a multicultural or child- oriented theme. A large aquarium in the central corridor was very interesting. Cafeteria furnishings were clean and in good repair. Figurines added a warm touch to the shelf above the cafeteria serving line. A Welcome Students banner and other colorful banners hung from the metal rafters of the cafeteria, brightening the room considerably. Ceiling fans in the cafeteria helped air flow on the extremely hot day. Wet mats were in place in the kitchen area. The stage floor was clean and waxed. A curtain made from bed sheets and decorated with stars helped hide the cluttered stage. The media center was clean and inviting. The girls restroom was handicapped accessible and free of graffiti. The one boys restroom was well supplied and appeared to be clean, although smelly. The urinals and commodes were functional. We also noted some areas needing attention:  Four portable buildings housed music, speech, gifted and talented. Title I, and two small sixth grade classes.  Much of the playground was barren, rocky, and in need of sod.  The pavement for the basketball court was old and cracked.  The air quality in the corridors was stultifying.  Maneuverability in the kitchen was limited because of the small facility.  The kitchen restroom had no ventilation of any kind.  Serious tile damage in the kitchen area posed a safety hazard.  The cafeteria was cluttered with several boxes, pieces of furniture, and a freezer that lined the rooms walls.  Furniture and boxes containing clothes and other miscellaneous items were strewn about the stage.  The media center was far too small to effectively house a media program, but the media specialist was doing the best possible under the circumstances.  The stationary shelves in the media center allowed little opportunity for developing reading centers or interesting displays. The materials collection was packed into the shelving, leaving little room to develop the collection.  Faucets in a girls restroom were operational, but water pressure was poor.  In the girls restroom, one stall door was broken and all stalls lacked interior locks.  Some litter was scattered on the floor in the girls restroom, and the facility lacked paper towels.  Some students reported roaches in the girls restroom.  The boys restroom had a foul odor.Booker Magnet School We were pleased to note that:  The U.S. flag was properly displayed on the flagpole at the entrance to the school.  The schools mission statement was prominently displayed in several locations throughout the building.  The interior hallways and the office were filled with bright, colorful displays that enhanced the appearance of the school and announced Bookers Arts theme to any and all visitors. The hall walls were enlivened by a series of colorful murals painted by the schools art specialist. Artwork was also present in an area overlooking the gymnasium.  Evidence of the schools art theme was present throughout the building: a display near the front entrance celebrated the Artist of the Week, Vincent Van Gogh\nthe hallways were adorned with student artwork\nand each pod of classrooms and the individual hallways were named after famous artists and performers.  School rules (e g., pertaining to the cafeteria or playground) were posted and expressed as expectations rather than rules.  Floors throughout the building were clean and shiny.  Lockers had been painted an attractive, neutral color and were in good condition.  Most of the fountains throughout the building were clean and operating with adequate pressure.  The cafeteria, which had fully operating interior lighting and large banks of windows, was light and airy.  The cafeteria floors, tables, and seating were clean and in good condition.  The kitchen had adequate work space.  Two kitchen fire extinguishers were easily accessible in the event of an emergency.  The media center was large and attractive.  The floors in the boys restrooms were in good condition and clean. The basins, toilets, and urinals were functioning normally.  The boys restrooms were supplied with toilet paper and soap. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The exterior of the school had an unkempt appearance\na planter in front of the flagpole was weed-choked and unsightly\nthe schools entry was devoid of plantings that could enhance the appearance of the building.  The interior courtyards were unsightly: while the courtyard grass had been mowed, little had been done to beautify the area\npiles of grass clippings, broken limbs, and some discarded items filled the courtyards.  The girls restroom near the cafeteria was a mess: rolls of toilet paper were strewn on the floor\nthe entry area was very dark and cluttered with stored cleaning supplies and equipment. Further, the room did not have a handicapped accessible stall or soap dispensers, although a single bar of soap lay on a small shelf below one of the mirrors.  The boys restrooms were dimly lit, smelled excessively of urine, and lacked paper towels.Cloverdale Elementary School We were pleased to note that:  The campus was very attractive and the lawns had been mowed recently.  Healthy mature trees and shrubs accented the entry courtyard.  The breezeways connecting the various sections of the school were very clean.  The courtyard was neatly mowed and the shrubbery trimmed.  A covered sidewalk provided access from the main building to the schools one portable classroom.  The school was almost litter free.  The office, which was very neat and uncluttered, had attractive, color-coordinated bulletin boards that brightened the area.  Children were very orderly as they walked to the cafeteria for lunch.  The cafeteria was quite clean, considering that we visited mid-way through the lunch period.  Cafeteria floors were clean and shiny.  Attractive displays and bulletin boards decorated the media center.  The media center carpeting was clean and in good condition.  The girls restroom was clean and supplied with paper products.  The boys restroom was supplied with both toilet paper and paper towels, and the floor was clean and in good repair.  Posted in the boys restroom were signed Bathroom Pledges by which the signatories committed to practice proper restroom behavior and encourage others to do likewise. We also noted some areas needing attention:  No flag was flying from the pole in front of the school.  The exterior trim paint was quite worn in some areas.  Much of the paint on metal surfaces (such as hand rails) had worn off.  The play area for four-year-olds was small and had only one climbing structure.  A section of bleachers, which faces the junior high practice field, sat on the main playground, creating a potentially dangerous area for the younger children who are naturally attracted to climbing.  Many classroom windows were dirty or covered with tape residue.  We noted a small amount of litter near the cafeteria.  Outside the main office, a large stack of boxed supplies detracted from the otherwise neat appearance of the entry.  The cafeteria was colorless and lacked any decoration, resulting in a banen, institutional look.  The school apparently did not allow children to converse during their lunch time as adults constantly chided children for talking. While none of the reprimanded children were being overly loud, nearly all the adults spoke loudly to the children. One lunchroom supervisor was especially harsh with the preschool class by instructing them to put your head down and close your mouth.  Some of the ceiling tiles in the media center showed signs of water damage.  The globes on display in the media center were out of date.Otter Creek Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The campus was mowed and litter free. Floors throughout the building were clean and shiny. While little student work was on display, the halls featured a variety of attractive teacher-made bulletin boards. The cafeteria was clean and spacious, and all tables and seating were spotless and in good repair. The large media center was neat, clean, attractive, and appeared ready for student use. An attractive bulletin board in the media center illustrated the awards children could earn with points awarded for their good behavior. The furnishings and carpet in the media center were in good condition. The girls restroom in the main hall was clean and odor free. In the boys restroom, all plumbing was functioning normally, and the common basin area had paper towels. We also noted some areas needing attention:  No flag was flying.  A downspout near the main entry was causing a great deal of erosion.  Some classrooms lacked identifying room numbers.  Several areas of the hall ceilings were water stained and warped.  A grouping of large wooden cabinets, which appeared to be used to store materials for the afterschool CARE program, cluttered the hall near the cafeteria.  The girls restroom in the main hall lacked soap and had some floor tiles that were damaged or missing.f Rightsell Elementary Incentive School fVe were pleased to note that:  The exterior of the school was very attractive\nthe buildings dark red trim was in excellent condition.  The campus was neat and litter free.  The interior halls were bright and welcoming.  A striking mural enhanced a wall near the office, and colorful displays abounded.  The interior paint was in good condition, and the carpets were clean.  The schools Parent Center was fully furnished and in use during our visit.  The cafeteria floors were waxed, clean, and shiny, and the tables and seats were clean and in good condition.  The cafeteria and other areas of the building were decorated with inspirational posters and banners (such as Believe, Achieve, Succeed)  The media center was neat, clean, well stocked, and attractively appointed.  The boys restrooms contained paper towels and toilet paper, and all fixtures were functioning. We also noted some areas needing attention:  No flag was flying from the flagpole.  The play area assigned to four-year-olds was very small and featured only one piece of climbing equipment.  An odor, which seemed to emanate from the workroom, caused the basement area to smell very foul.  The basement area had a severe leak that left the carpet soggy and malodorous.  The classroom adjoining the basement area had wet spots along the adjoining wall.  While fully supplied, the girls restroom in the basement had an unpleasant odor (as did the entire basement).  Some baseboards in the girls restroom were damaged or missing.  The linoleum flooring was ripped in the boys restroom on the second floor.Wakefield Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The playground offered good equipment for younger children and lots of shade trees. Several picnic tables had been recently added to a pleasant shaded area. The floors were clean and highly polished. A large display board, featuring color photographs of each class, dominated the entryway. The 4-6 building had several colorful wall murals. Large, brightly colored paper banners, identifying rooms and specialty areas, hung along the corridors. The cafeteria was clean and the furnishings were in good repair. Ceiling fans improved air circulation in the cafeteria. A beautiful, wood-beamed ceiling accentuated by decorative dropped lighting gave the cafeteria a very homey appearance. Cafeteria workers set the tables with eating utensils for the kindergarten students. The girls restrooms had adequate supplies of paper products, and all the stall doors had locks. The boys restrooms were supplied with paper products and soap, and the floors and tile work were clean. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The windows, which form much of the exterior walls, have aged shabbily.  The asphalt covering one of the two basketball courts was broken and dangerous.  A seriously eroded area between two buildings created an eyesore and a hazard for children.  The concrete walk in front of the 4-6 building was badly damaged.  Ventilation in the corridors was nonexistent.  Two double fountains were inoperable, one because it lacked knobs and the other because water pressure was too poor to create any flow.  A large panel was missing from the display case, leaving unsightly globs of mud-colored adhesive.  The 4-6 building was not handicapped accessible.  Several desks with attached chairs were lined up against one corridor wall.  The wooden blinds attached to the cafeterias serving window were badly broken and could not be closed after lunch. As a result, according to a cafeteria worker, students would sometimes crawl through the opening and get into the kitchen area.  The dishwasher was leaking and creating a safety hazard\nthe kitchen had no wet mats.  The stage floor was scratched and chipped.  Several pieces of classroom furniture and work equipment, such as a paper roll stand, were on the stage.  The media center was small and appeared to have been converted from a classroom.  Shelving and equipment was crowded into every nook and cranny in the media center, but the specialist had arranged enough seating to accommodate a full class.  The carpet in the media center had two tom ragged seams across the entire room.  Although litter-free, one girls restroom was marred by graffiti on the stall walls. Another girls restroom was clean, but contained several pieces of litter.  One girls restroom had a small piece of soap, and the other had none.  In the girls restrooms, sinks were badly chipped and stained, one ceiling panel was missing and others were chipped and gouged, the stalls contained no disposals for feminine hygiene products, the floor under one sink was wet (possibly from a leak), several floor tiles were missing, and the cinder block walls in one of the restrooms were damaged badly.  One boys restroom had an unpleasant odor.Washington Magnet Interdistrict Elementary School We were pleased to note that:  The playground included well-made climbing structures, two paved basketball courts, and good grassy areas.  A paved drive traversed the entire length of the back lawn, allowing furniture to be moved easily in and out of classrooms.  The corridors reflected the buildings recent construction and were clean and attractive throughout.  Natural light coming from sky lights located near the entryways created a pleasant atmosphere.  The hallways were clean and the floors were spotless.  Colorful display boards featured several different themes (such as the environment, math in art, and map reading) that served to educate the viewer.  Each classroom area had tack strips attached to the concrete block walls, providing an easy way to display student work. Lots of student work was visible, including art displays and test papers.  Specialty rooms (such as art and Student Improvement Program for Success [SIPS]), were distinguished by colorful banners hanging outside the door.  The cafeteria was clean and the furnishings were in good repair.  Mats were in front of the doors leading from the kitchen to the outside.  The kitchen area was very well ventilated and air conditioned.  The large room housing the media center included lots of attractive book shelves.  A large storage room adjacent to the media centers entry provided adequate storage for audio visual equipment.  The girls restrooms had plenty of paper products and handicapped accessible stalls that included two handrails.  One of the girls restrooms had a dispenser for feminine hygiene products.  The hand washing station located between the boys and girls restrooms had plenty of soap.  The boys restrooms were well supplied and functional. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The flagpole was bare.  The playground lacked adequate shade.  Some exit doors were not secure.  The drop-in ceiling tile showed water damage from a leaky roof.  Carts and boxes cluttered the aisles in the kitchen, creating a safety hazard.  The kitchen contained no wet mats.  The stage curtain was tom and faded, and the carpet covering the stage was worn, stained, and wrinkled.  Multiple carpet stains in the media center detracted from the beauty of the room and its furnishings.  In the girls restrooms, locks were broken on some stalls, and the disposals for feminine hygiene products were missing bottoms, making them unusable.  In some of the girls restrooms, lighting was very poor, a ceiling panel was missing and others were water-stained, and one handicapped accessible stall had a very sharp turn, making it difficult to maneuver in a wheelchair.  Two girls restrooms contained litter on the floors and in the sinks, and one restroom had no identifying sign on the door.  The boys restroom near the front entry was messy from recent use.Forest Heights Junior High School We were pleased to note that:  The exterior of the building was well tended and despite a very dry, hot summer, the ground plantings were in good condition.  The shaded courtyard where students gathered to sit at picnic tables and on benches was litter free.  The entryway and all corridor floors were polished to a high shine.  Waste baskets were placed at intervals along each corridor, and no litter was evident anywhere on the campus.  Concrete walls were attractive and lockers were in like-new condition.  Some exterior doors in the older building were decorated with colorful murals.  Stairways were well lit and wide enough for heavy traffic.  The buildings and classrooms were very quiet.  Fire extinguishers were highly visible and plentiful.  The cafeteria was spotless and the tables were in good repair.  Wide aisles in the kitchen facilitated traffic flow.  The gymnasium was old but well maintained and had handicapped seating available in the bleacher area.  The basketball court sparkled, and the locker rooms were clean and neat.  The media centers special lighting over the checkout desk and magazine section greeted visitors with a dramatic effect, almost like sunlight. The room had well-kept carpeting, educational displays, attractive furnishings, an eye-catching materials collection, and a computer work station that was on-line to the Internet.  The girls restrooms were exceptionally clean with no litter or graffiti\nthe sinks and faucets (including those in the older buildings) were in excellent condition\nthey had plenty of paper products available\nthe stall doors looked new\nand each restroom was handicapped accessible.  The boys restrooms in the main building were spic-and-span, well supplied, and furnished with mirrors that glistened. The boys restrooms in the older sections of the building were similarly clean, despite their age. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The raised planting beds were overgrown with weeds.  The older areas of the campus had serious soil and concrete erosion.  The courtyard where students gathered was banen from heavy traffic.  One stairwell window had a horizontal crack that ran the entire length of the casement.  The cinder block wall at the entrance to the cafeteria was badly soiled and stained, creating a very unsightly and unappealing appearance.  In the cafeteria, the stools were in poor condition and the ceiling tile was seriously water damaged.  In the kitchen, the wet areas lacked mats\nseveral floor tiles were chipped, cracked, or broken\nan oven was broken\nand a wheel was missing from a large milk cart, causing it to tip to one side.  The temperature in the gymnasium was near 100.  Some girls restrooms lacked soap and disposals for feminine hygiene products.  The ceiling in one girls restroom that was located in an older building was badly peeled and insulation was pulled from one section of a heating vent pipe.  One restroom had no identifying sign.Mabelvale Junior High School We were pleased to note that:  The campus was immaculate. Lawns surrounding the school and in the courtyard were neatly mowed, and the entry was accented by a planting bed filled with perennials and a blooming crape myrtle.  Breezeways featured plenty of lined trash cans, and the campus was litter free.  Both the state and national flags were properly displayed on the pole in front of the school.  The school secretary was very friendly and welcoming, and the principal was very helpful and exhibited a pleasant demeanor with both students and adults.  Class change was orderly and plenty of adults were present.  The lockers were in good condition and free of graffiti.  In the cafeteria, the tables and seating were clean and in good condition, the floors were waxed and clean, the ceiling tiles were in good repair, and all flourescent lights were functioning properly.  The cafeteria was a comfortable temperature despite the 100 outside temperature.  The kitchens temperature was moderated by several fans, including a large window-mounted fan.  Kitchen lighting was adequate, and both a sprinkler system and a hand-held fire extinguisher were present.  The library had recently been recarpeted with a neutral-colored carpet that was attractive and coordinated well with the existing furnishings and decor.  The gymnasium was very warm, but some relief was provided by a large fan and open doors.  Both the gymnasium floor and bleachers were in good condition.  The girls restroom we visited was bright, clean, odor free, and fully supplied, but it lacked soap dispensers, although bar soap was available.  All toilets, urinals, and basins were functioning properly in the boys restrooms, and all the floors were in good repair, clean, and free of litter.  The boys restrooms were stocked with paper products and were well ventilated to keep down heat and odor. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The campus included several portable classrooms, most of which were unsightly.  While all other parts of the school were connected by covered walkways, students had to walk unprotected to all the portable buildings.  The water fountain near the restrooms on the second level was not operable.  Sections of floor tile were missing at the both the entrance and exit to the cafeteria.  Possibly due to its recent renovation, the library did not appear ready for students to use.Hall High School We were pleased to note that:  The litter-fi-ee campus, which had been recently mowed, included a variety of blooming annuals, as well as shrubs and trees. Attractive picnic tables and benches were scattered around the courtyard areas.  In keeping with Halls role as an LRSD Newcomers Center for non-English speaking students, signs in the front foyer welcomed visitors in several languages. The Newcomers Center is conveniently located, and bulletin boards with multilingual themes are present in the corridors.  The front doors were spotless and looked as if they had just been painted.  The entry hall featured a well-maintained planter filled with tropical plants.  Staff members and security officers were present throughout the campus.  Security personnel were very respectful, firiendly, and helpful to both visitors and students.  The halls contained a variety of bright banners and bulletin boards, and one corridor included an excellent display featuring Native American art. A Cleanliness is Contagious sign encouraged students to join efforts to keep the building clean.  Floors throughout the building were clean and shiny.  All fountains were functioning with adequate water pressure.  Hallway intersections were labeled with arrows and numbers to help students find their way.  Cafeteria floors were polished and free of debris despite the lunch crowd being present. Furnishings were in good repair and clean, and several colorful wall murals brightened the room.  The serving personnel were very efficient and courteous.  The kitchen area was spacious, allowing easy movement during food preparation and serving times.  The design of the media center was attractive and provided opportunities for developing reading and specialty centers. Computer work stations were scattered around the large room. The carpeting and furniture were well maintained.  All aspects of the gymnasium featured the schools colors, from the walls to the bleachers.  An attractive mural of Native Americans on horseback, symbolic of the schools mascot (the Warriors) adorned part of one gymnasium wall.  The gyms playing surface was shiny and in excellent condition, and the bleachers were functional, free of graffiti, and in good repair.  The restroom in the girls locker room was clean and supplied with paper products.  The entire area in the boys locker room was immaculate. The restroom was supplied with paper products and all plumbing was functioning normally. The dressing area contained well-maintained lockers in the school colors.  The girls restrooms were very well lit and had colorful, well-maintained floor tiles, good ventilation and pleasant air quality, and plenty of soap and paper products.  The girls restroom in the math building was clean, odor-free, and fully supplied with paper products.  Boys restrooms were clean and well supplied. We also noted some areas needing attention:  No flags were displayed on the flagpole located on the east side of the building.  A large pile of discarded furniture was stacked behind the kitchen, apparently awaiting removal.  The ceiling tiles in the area adjacent to the cafeteria were water stained and warped.Hall High School Page 2 Some exterior doors were not secured. A wall in an alcove by the cafeteria had a diagonal crack approximately two feet long. Ceiling tiles in the 400 corridor had been vandalized. A large alcove by the serving area contained several pieces of equipment and supplies, creating a very unsightly view from the eating area. The ceiling plaster over the serving lines was peeling, creating a health hazard. In the kitchen, door plates were protruding in two entryways, several floor tiles were missing, and no wet mats were accessible. The bottom windows in the kitchen lacked screens\ntherefore, they could not be opened to improve air flow. In the girls locker room, several of the lockers were damaged and a strong pungent odor evident, even though no PE classes were being held on the day we examined the facility. The restroom in the boys locker room lacked stalls and soap. was  The girls restrooms contained some litter and graffiti. None of the stall doors had locks, and some stall doors had no exterior handles.  One of the girls restrooms was not handicapped accessible.  The girls restroom in the math building lacked soap, and the restroom in the girls locker room lacked a dispenser for feminine hygiene products.  One of the girls restrooms had wall tiles that contained several holes as a result of missing plumbing fixtures. In another, one side of a heating unit had broken away from the wall, making the unit appear to be slipping down the wall.  Two of the boys restrooms had been damaged to the extent that toilet seats and a stall door were missing.Date: November 24, 1998 To: Melissa From,!' Ann Re: Follow Up on SWAT Monitoring I need you to do a follow-up on some of the schools that were the subject of our first-of-the-year swats in August. I want to know the extent to which the schools have corrected the problems we noted early in the school year. Im particularly interested in the schools listed below, because they seemed to be the ones with the most problems that could be corrected without major undertakings (such as enlarging the media center, for example). If you have others you want to investigate, thats fine. You dont have to monitor the whole school\npay particular attention to the areas that the team rated as needing attention to determine whether or not improvements have been made. That list can serve as your monitoring guide, although you might also see other things that you want to comment on. Depending on what you uncover (really good or really bad), well discuss whether to write up your findings in some sort of follow-up communication to the superintendents. Regardless, let me have your written findings in a list format that follows that of the SWATs. Unless you get some unexpected action on your enrollment figures to put you back on that report, plan on giving me this information by December 11. Thanks very much. LRSD PCSSD NLRSD Bale Elementary Cloverdale Elementary Wakefield Elementary Hall High Bates Elementary Jacksonville Elementary Oakbrooke Elementary Robinson Junior High Mills High Boone Park Elementary Lakewood Middle SchoolDate: December 10, 1998 To: From Melissa Re: Swat Follow-up Thanks for your good work on the Swat follow up. Looks like the schools and districts made many improvements, but also a significant number of detractions remain. Im appalled by some of the indefensible adult behavior you noted, especially at Bates, environments. What despicable role models! Talk about negative learning I think we should send this information out. It shows that were keeping our eyes open, and it will alert the schools and superintendent to areas that need attention. Hopefully, the comments on adult behavior will get some action. I idly made some editing notes as I read your findings, although I know you werent writing a document for publication. Please make all needed changes and compose a draft letter that I can send to the superintendents with copies to the principals. Thanks very much. Memo To: Ann From: ( Melissa Subject: Follow-up to Swat Visits Date: December 10, 1998 Attached are copies of my findings regarding the schools due for follow-up visits. As you asked, this format mirrors the original. If we decide to send the information to the schools, I think that the format might need to be revised somewhat. Let me know what you think. Thanks!Bale Elementary School We were pleased to note that: Thecate and National flags were flying. The asphalt in the parking lot had been repaired. The exterior was neat, attractive, and litter-ffee. The interior of the school was clean and filled with attractive holiday decorations. An appealing display featuring a Christmas tree, wrapped presents, and toys brightened the spacious entry area. A large floor mat personalized with the school name also brightened the entry. The floors were clean and shiny, and the staff had clearly made the most of an older, rather plain building. The formerly cluttered areas of the stage and cafeteria had been cleared and now appeared neat and tidy. Students and staff were polite, friendly, and very orderly. We also noted some areas needing attention: While locks had been added to the stall doors in the girls restroom, the fittings were not properly aligned and the doors would not lock. Water pressure in the girls restroom was still poor. The boys restroom still had a very strong urine odor.Cloverdale Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The oflBce and the surrounding area were neat and uncluttered. An attractive bulletin board enhanced the appearance of the outer office. Most of the windowsjooked as if they had been washed since our last visit, but some tape residueandpaint gplash^ remained. Staff members wereln^dly to visitors. No flag was flying, but our follow-up visit took place on a rainy day when it would have been inappropriate to displayZL  We also noted some areas needing improvement: The front of the school was quite littered. No change had been made in the unadorned, institutional cafeteria. Throughout the school, we heard adults shouting at students who were going to and from lunch. In the cafeteria the adults routinely spoke very sharply to the children. These same adults would the^speak very pleasantly to other staff members or visitors. Conditions in the media center were unchanged. Although the space was neat and attractively decorated, the only globes were out of date. Playground conditions were unchanged.Wakefield Elementary School We were pleased to note that: Staff members were fiiendly and welcoming. Workers were in the process of removing the large quantity of recently fallen leaves that covered the grounds. What had formerly been unsightly, damaged display case had been replaced with a new, large bulletin board. New lettering proclaiming the school name had been applied to the exterior of the building. The broken dishwasher in the kitchen had been repaired. The stage floor was clean and usable^ but some furniture and paper rolls were stored around the perimeter. We also noted some areas that needed attention: The flag pole did not display either the state or national flag. The front walk and other areas of the campus were littered. The concrete slabs that anchor some of the basketball goals protruded several inches above the surrounding terrain. These rough concrete slabs pose both a tripping hazard and danger to anyone who might fall or be knocked down in that area. The broken wooden blinds in the cafeteria still had not been fixed. Nearly all of the problems noted with the facility in August still remain. The principal indicated that she had sent in work orders for each of the items mentioned in our earlier summary.Hall High School We were pleased to note that: Flags were flying in front of the school. A member of the security staff was stationed at the main entrance, monitoring the parking lot. All exterior doors, except the main entry were properly secured. The office staff were very friendly and welcoming. Staff and students throughout the school were fnendly and helpful. The overall impression of the school was very positive. The grounds were neat, and the interior was clean with shiny floors. The large pile of discarded furniture outside the cafeteria had been removed, and the area was spotless. The cluttered alcove near the cafeteria serving area had been cleared and the entire area looked neat. The peeling paint over the serving line had been scraped and workers had applied some type of opaque primer over the spots. We also noted some areas needing attention: The kitchen still lacked window screens. No repairs had been made to the damaged kitchen floor. The girls locker room was odor-fiee and relatively neat, but it suffered from some vandalism. Two of the five restroom stalls were missing doors, and one of the commodes was missing its seat. Restrooms throughout the school were clean, odor-free, and supplied with soap and paper towels. When we visited late in the day, some of the stalls lacked toilet paper. While the restrooms were not disreputable, many were showing their age. Few of the restroom stalls had locks.Bates Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The broken birdbath had been removed from the front lawn. Both the state and the national flags were flying. , -7 The exterior of the school was enhanced by large, healthy holly trees.  The office staff was fnendly and welcoming even though they were also involved in hosting a COE visit from ADE. More student work was on display than the last time we visited. We also noted some areas needing attention: Students were running and shouting in the hall after leaving the cafeteria. Conditions in the cafeteria had not changed since our earlier visits. One boys restroom lacked any type of identifying sign. Odor in several restrooms was still strong. The handicapped stall in one restroom was locked. We noted one teacher who was being terribly verbally abusive to her first grade students. The children had been running in the hall and two of the group were involved in some horseplay. The teacher screamed at the top of her lungs at the entire group. She yelled at the entire class in a loud and abusive voice and finally took two children to the office to call their parents. When she left for the office, she left the remainder of the children unattended. A monitor remained in the room with the class for about ten minutes until a group of older student helpers arrived.Jacksonville Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The grounds were neat and attractive. The entire school was very clean and attractively decorated with an international holiday theme. The stage was set for an upcoming play. The storage area behind the stage contained a variety of furniture and other items, neatly stored. While stall doors still lacked locks, the girls restrooms were clean, free of odor and litter, and supplied. Staff and students were very fnendly and welcoming toward visitors. We also noted some areas needing attention: Conditions in the kitchen were unchanged from our previous visit. The principal said that they have wet mats, but the mats were not visible because they were taken out and washed each day after lunch. The principal also indicated that she had the Fire Marshal return to the school, and that he assured her that the kitchen met their safety standards. A work order had been turned in regarding the garbage disposal, but it was not yet repaired.Oakbrooke Elementary School We were pleased to note that: The grounds were neat and free of debris. The school was attractively decorated with seasonal displays of student work. The gym area of the former Woodland Hills building was much neater than when we visited in August. The flaking paint in the hall had been scraped and repainted. Floor mats at each entry ensured that the floors remained clean and dry on a rainy day. While a portion of the third grade hall was still being used for storage and photocopying, the work area was quite neat. No flag was flying, but our follow-up visit took place on a rainy day when it would not have been appropriate to raise the flag. A new, large wall map had been added to the media center. We also noted some areas needing attention: One of the restrooms still lacked any identifying sign. While a new map had been purchased for the media center, the large globe displayed near it was out of date. Handrails were quite rusty. The mismatched floor tiles still marred an otherwise clean and shiny floor.Robinson Junior High School We were pleased to note that: The office door had been repainted The fallen tree and other organic debris noted in August had been removed. Qldtlhe courtyards were in the process of being raked. The principal and office staff were fnendly and welcoming. We also noted some areas needing attention: None of the other items noted as needing attention in the August report had been addressed. All the other deficiencies remained in virtually unchanged condition. As the principal notec^ many of the items on our list would require an investment by the PCSSD. One no-cost item was also ignored# -nee again, no flags were flying.Mills High School We were pleased to note that:  The public spaces appeared generally neat and attractive.  Work had obviously been done on the restrooms. The walls had been repainted as had the graffiti covered stall partitions. Girls restrooms were odor-free and supplied, but many stalls lacked a toilet paper dispenser.  The new computers in the media center were now available for Internet access.  Students were very fnendly, and students dining in the cafeteria were very well-behaved. The atmosphere in the cafeteria was relaxed and pleasant. After students concluded their meals, they engaged in a variety of activities including guitar playing, dominoes, and card games. Several staff members were on duty in the area. We also noted some areas that needed attention:  Other than some improvement to the restrooms, we noted little improvement in the deficiencies noted in the August report.  The kitchen floor remained in very poor condition. More tiles were missing than noted at the beginning of the school year. Kitchen staff reported that a worker tripped and fell in early October.  The areas around the dumpster continued to be littered and unsightly.  The unofficial smoking area located outside the auditorium^as a blight with discarded chairs, an old mop, and assorted other broken and rusting furnishings.  The faulty locking device on the folding bleachers has not been repaired.  While the new computers in the media center are no online with the Internet, they are not fully operational. Students cannot print from these terminals or use them for any task other than Internet access. The new file server has not yet been installed, and this limits the capability of the entire system of computers in the media center. Student demand for computer time far outweighs the available equipment.Boone Park Elementary School We were pleased to note that: \u0026gt; * t y if 3 The exterior of the school looked neat and attractive and was free of litter. The hallways were clean, bright, and well-lit. The entire interior of the building had recently been repainted in a cream and blue color scheme. The fresh, cream-colored hall walls really brightened the interior spaces. All classrooms had been labeled with both the teachers name and the room number. Students were quiet and orderly in the halls and the cafeteria. Restrooms were clean and supplied with the basics, except paper towels. Teachers stood just outside the restroom doors distributing paper towels to the children. The broken window in the auditorium door had been repaired. We also noted some areas that needed attention: e No flags were flying from the flag pole. Exit lights in the cafeteria remained unlit. V The wall-mounted cork strips in the halls were damaged and unsightly in some spots.Lakewood Middle School We -were pleased to note that: c The flags were properly displayed from the pole in front of the building. All exterior doors, except one, were locked. ' The entire campus was neat and free of litter. ' The interior of the school was neat, litter-free, and attractively decorated with student art and seasonal touches. ' Installation of the new elevator had been completed. The elevator blended beautifully with the existing building and looked as if it could have been original. Stairwells were uncluttered. Repairs to the girls restroom near the office had been completed. ' All restrooms were neat, supplied, and well-lit. We also noted some areas needing attention: ' While the school is very attractive and well-kept, it is about due for interior repainting. Many spots such as hand rails have worn, chipped paint.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United Stales District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 January 7, 1999 Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: As you know, at the beginning of each school year, ODM monitors make brief, informal visits to some schools in all three Pulaski County school districts. In September, I sent you the summaries of our visits to LRSD schools. In December we paid brief, unannounced, follow-up visits to a few of those same schools. We selected for follow-up those schools that had a number of deficiencies which the district could address without major building modifications. During the December visits, our monitoring concentrated on those areas we had noted as needing attention at the beginning of the school year. We also made note of any improvements we observed. We hope that the enclosed comments give you and your staff the benefit of our impressions. As has been our custom, we will not publish or file these observations at this time, although we might eventually include them in some aspect of a formal report. Please don t hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. cc: Building principalsBale Elementary School IVe were pleased to note that:  The state and national flags were flying.  The asphalt in the parking lot, which had been riddled with potholes, had been repaired.  The exterior was neat, attractive, and litter-free.  The interior of the school was clean and filled with attractive holiday decorations.  An appealing display featuring a Christmas tree, wrapped presents, and toys brightened the spacious entry area.  A large floor mat personalized with the school name also brightened the entry.  The clean and shiny floors, a wealth of attractive displays, and brightly decorated classrooms indicated that the staff had made the most of an older, rather plain building.  The formerly cluttered areas of the stage and cafeteria had been cleared and now appeared neat and tidy.  Staff and students were polite, friendly, and very orderly. We also noted some areas that still had not been addressed:  While locks had been added to the stall doors in the girls restroom in the main hall, the fittings were not properly aligned and the doors would not lock.  Water pressure in the girls restroom was still poor.  The boys restroom still had a very strong urine odor. Cloverdale Elementary School IVe were pleased to note that:  The office and the surrounding area were neat and uncluttered. An attractive bulletin board enhanced the appearance of the outer office.  Most of the windows looked as if they had been washed since our last visit, but some tape residue and paint splashes remained.  Staff members were friendly to visitors.  No flag was flying, but our follow-up visit took place on a rainy day when it would have been inappropriate to display a flag. We also noted some areas that still had not been addressed:  The front of the school was quite littered.  No change had been made in the unadorned, institutional-looking cafeteria.  Throughout the school, we heard adults shouting at students who were going to and from lunch. In the cafeteria the adults routinely spoke very sharply to the children. These same adults would then speak very pleasantly to other staff members or visitors.  Although the space was neat and attractively decorated, ceiling tiles in the media center had not been replaced. The only globes were out of date.  Playground conditions were unchanged: play equipment for the four-year-olds was still limited, and bleachers still occupied one section of the larger play area.Wakefield Elementary School We M ere pleased to note that:  Staff members were friendly and welcoming.  Workers were in the process of removing the large quantity of recently fallen leaves that covered the grounds.  What had formerly been an unsightly, damaged display case had been replaced with a new, large bulletin board.  New lettering proclaiming the school name had been applied to the exterior of the building.  The broken dishwasher in the kitchen had been repaired.  The stage floor was clean and usable, but some furniture and paper rolls were stored around the perimeter. We also noted some areas that still had not been addressed:  The flag pole did not display either the state or national flag.  The front walk and other areas of the campus were littered.  The concrete slabs that anchor some of the basketball goals protruded several inches above the surrounding terrain. These rough concrete poses both a tripping hazard and danger to anyone who might fall or be knocked down in that area.  The broken wooden blinds in the cafeteria still had not been fixed.  Nearly all of the problems noted with the facility in August still remain: weathered walkways, the general disrepair and lack of handicapped access to the building serving grades 4-6, run-down restrooms, inoperable water fountains, and the like. The principal indicated that she had sent in work orders for each of the items noted in our earlier summary.Hall High School IVe were pleased to note that:  Both the state and national flags were flying in front of the school.  A member of the security staff was stationed at the main entrance, monitoring the parking lot.  All exterior doors, except the main entry, were properly secured.  The office staff were very friendly and welcoming.  Staff and students throughout the school were friendly and helpful.  Our overall impression of the school was very positive. The grounds were neat, and the interior was clean with shiny floors.  The large pile of discarded furniture outside the cafeteria had been removed, and the area was spotless.  The cluttered alcove near the cafeteria serving area had been cleared and the entire area looked neat.  The peeling paint over the serving line had been scraped and workers had applied some type of opaque primer over the spots. We also noted some areas that still had not been addressed:  The kitchen still lacked window screens.  No repairs had been made to the damaged kitchen floor.  The girls locker room was odor-free and relatively neat, but it suffered from some vandalism. Two of the five restroom stalls were missing doors, and one of the commodes was missing its seat.  Restrooms throughout the school were clean, odor-free, and supplied with soap and paper towels. When we visited late in the day, some of the stalls lacked toilet paper. While the restrooms were not disreputable, many were showing their age.  Few of the restroom stalls had locks.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1502","title":"Testing: Benchmark Examination comparison, Little Rock School District, Primary, Grade 4","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1998/2000"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","Little Rock School District","Students","School management and organization","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Testing: Benchmark Examination comparison, Little Rock School District, Primary, Grade 4"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1502"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["18 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1517","title":"Testing: Test of Academic Skills, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1998/1999"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","School management and organization","School integration","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Testing: Test of Academic Skills, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1517"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["57 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_31","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-11/1997-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project management"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/31"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["287 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant.\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION IVED ov 2 6 1997 OlflCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for November, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General -\n__~ /, ~ TIMO'i1-tva. ~ER#95019 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education , IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL RECEIVE NOV 2 S 1997 OFFiCE OF DESffl ~,~ITORING DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Sa_sed on the 1mormation=availa61e at Octooer'31, 19'97, ~ ADE i\nal~ulated for FY 97(98, subject to_periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 At October 1997, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY '97/98 were as follows: LRSD - $11,470,002 NLRSD- $6,618,198 pc~sD -J1p, 111,014 !The allotments of State Equalization Funding calculated for FY 97/98 at October 31, 1997, subject to periodic 2 c\nljustments, were _as follows: LRSD - $42,056,681 NLRSD- $24,266,733 PCSSD- $55,410,722 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 3~1, 1997 (or FY 97 /9~, suofect io periodic apj1cJstments. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 IJ bistributions'fo'r Fy ~7{98\"\"at b.d8Deri 3'1\n199'7 !~talea, $2,~55,317. otment calculated at October 1997for FY 97/98 was $9,002,821, '4 'OY~'1i. .............. ~~x:ic-................... = .,.,...,._ bjecJ to. p~ri.odic agjuslments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 t\nalculated f r FY 97/98, _subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. J . 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distributions for FY 97/98 at October 31, 1997 were: LRSD - $709,626 ~LRSD - $283,222 PCSSD - $1,164,468 The allotments calculated for FY 97 /98 at October 31, 1997, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $3,548,125 NLRSD-$1,416,112 PCSSD - $5,822,342 Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 97/98 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance was notified to pay the first onethird payments for FY 97/98 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function. L. ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance made the first one-third payments to the Districts for their FY 97/98 transportation budget. At October 1997, the following had be~n paid for fY 97/98: LRSO - $1,019,861.33 NLRSD- $141,696.00 PCSSD- $536,541.00 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. s I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD- 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2 ,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD- 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD- 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1 . Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The LRSD received $3,000,000 in June 1997. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $15,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 8 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. 9 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of program. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Quantitative and qualitative indicators were displayed with specific information provided on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to 11 Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) As of June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. Copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available for the Districts to review on July 10, 1997 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The purpose of the review was to provide the Districts an opportunity to review the report prior to submitting it to the Court. Desegregation monitoring staff members were available to answer questions. Representatives from each district participated. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for 55 educators from the Districts was held September 10, 1997. Monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits were discussed. As of October 1997, 10 of the Cycle 2 announced monitoring visits were completed, and 36 technical assistance visits were conducted. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff. Deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues were discussed regarding the completion of the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announcecl monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. 11 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 12 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1 . Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 8. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 13 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91- 67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 14 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. lri~Octobef1{:f97, lne Ojstricts were requested to advise:the-ADE, in ~rJting, noJater than, N9vember_ 1, 1997 of any f'!ew lawJhat might i-mm- pede~their desegregation efforts. As of, November 12, 1997, no :0. :)(},. .\n'Y \" \\\" :,, ~ritten',,,responses were received from the Districts. t The ADE ~. % ,_'\u0026lt;\"\"',M \"\"\" -\n: -,\n'\n,\"'  '' d ~ \":\nJ_   fOnCIY,,des th.,.at \u0026amp;!he D1stncts do ,not'feel that,apy1newjpw negatively illlpacts th.~Jr d~~g[~gation efforts. 15 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 16 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. 17 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test val idation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. 18 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the PMT and its executive summary at the July 14, 1997 board meeting. Additionally, copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary were also provided to board members. The State Board of Education received copies of the PMT and its executive summary at the August 11, 1997 board meeting. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and to direction regarding the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review in accordance with the requirements contained in the ADE monitoring documents. In October 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. Additionally, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. 19 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) 20 VI. REMEDIATION A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. 21 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Team lists and materials for two-day visits were prepared, and written reports of two-day team visits were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed for completeness and included in the July monitoring report. The twoday peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of compensatory program. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for the 96/97 school year. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter and to include the race, gender, and years of experience of the teacher. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed with training schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. 22 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In October 1996, all schools in the Districts identified their technical assistance needs by utilizing their school improvement plans. Technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. The announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. In March and April 1997, 76 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. As of May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated central office staff concerning school improvement planning, and a workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. In August 1997, technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year. 23 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In October 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. The field service representatives provided technical assistance to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. l_n November 1997, technic\naf r~view')5'f1the EC0E process were f:onaucted_by the field servi~ r~preenJ~iio~opjunction wi!h the ~nnounc~d' rn.onitoring visits. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. 24 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) _ 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In August 1995, a new ERIC disc arrived, and an updated search was conducted. These articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 25 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I Mid-Winter Conference. The theme of the conference centered around the Improving America's Schools Act which emphasizes creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. 26 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children which facilitated the ADE in identifying and obtaining technical assistance resources. The focus of the conference was Excellence Without Excuse - Educating All Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference in order to identify and obtain technical assistance resources for use in desegregation efforts. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowennent and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997 which identified technical assistance resources available to the Districts. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi in their continuing efforts of identifying resources for providing technical assistance. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June 1997, field service staff attended a SAT-9 testing workshop to facilitate their efforts of identifying resources for providing technical assistance to the Districts. 27 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In July 1997, the field service specialists participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In a continuing effort to identify and provide technical assistance resources to the Districts, Field Service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference in August 1997. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Leaming in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. The ELLA program provides staff development to classroom teachers with an emphasis on grades K-3. The Schools of the 21st Century program emphasizes a coordination of efforts and resources within the community to prepare children in their early years for school. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. In an effort to obtain resources for technical assistance, the Lead Planner, the Equity Coordinator, the Reading Specialist, and the Assistant Director for Accountability attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 28 VII. TEST VALIDATION A. Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or other monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date March, 1995 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On March 29, 1995, letters were sent to four national experts about conducting a test bias validation of the Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition, Form K (SAT-8). Dr. Paul Williams, Deputy Director of Educational Testing Service (ETS), contacted the ADE in April of 1995 concerning the proposal for validating the SAT-8 test. The ADE requested that Dr. Williams conduct a validity study of test items used in the SAT-8. Dr. Williams submitted a final proposal for his services. The ADE Bias Review Test Committee met Friday, July 7, 1995, and approved Dr. William's contract proposal. The final contract was forwarded to Dr. Williams for his signature. The contract was signed in August 1995, thereby, completing this goal. B. By April 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representatives of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Complete. ADE established a Bias Review Committee in April 1994. In accordance with the Implementation Plan, representatives from the Districts and the parties were invited to attend and participate in this and all meetings of the Bias Review Committee. 29 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. 1. Projected Ending Date March 1995 and ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Dr. Paul Williams met with the staff of the Psychological Corporation to review their methods and procedures. In August 1995, he met with the staff at Georgia State University to review the statistical methods that would be used in the analysis. Dr. Williams reported difficulty with the bias-review study in receiving the names of the bias panel and the complete SAT-8 data set from the Psychological Corporation . Dr. Williams submitted an invoice totaling $8,961 for Task I activities of the SAT-8 validity study for partial fulfillment of the test validation study. On December 6, 1995, a contract extension for Dr. Williams was reviewed by the Legislative Council. In January 1996, he indicated that he was in the final stages of the test validation, and the ADE was presented a draft report in March 1996. In May 1996, Dr. Williams stated that the wrong data sets were sent to him by the Psychological Corporation resulting in Task 3 having to be redone. A new draft of the final report was received by the ADE in July 1996. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team for their review. On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that they had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The ADE Director indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the ADE Director, the ADE Assistant Director for Technical Services, and the ADE Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. 30 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) Test validation procedures by the expert have been completed. A recommendation was drafted proposing the use of the SAT-8 by the ADE as the validated test for monitoring. The ADE is presently working to arrange a meeting with the Administration of the LRSD to discuss the test validation study. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow the ADE to move forward in this matter. In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. 31 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING A. Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. B. Develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. C. Implement in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 32 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In April 1995, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee were provided an overview of the Scott Alternative Learning Center's operation and met with students and staff. In May 1995, the Districts were in the process of self-assessment and planning for fall staff development. The Districts worked on staff development to be incorporated into their fall 95/96 preschool calendars. The uniqueness of each district's needs and their schools was considered in the planning by utilizing the results of needs assessment instruments. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 13, 1995 to plan for an ADE administered Classroom Management grant. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 19, 1995 to finalize the Classroom Management grant proposal. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 24, 1995 to discuss program and staff development evaluation models that might be available to the Districts. On November 15, 1995, the ADE met with an ODM representative to discuss the progress the ADE had made in attaining the objectives outlined in the Implementation Plan with regard to inservice training. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 21, 1995 to discuss upcoming training events and various NLR programs that focus on non-academic needs. A new program consisting of placing a graduate student of social work, a field supervisor, and a OHS worker in the district at no cost to the district was discussed. Additionally, NLR provided an overview of their program for credit deficient students. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 19, 1995 to discuss information dealing with ways to broaden the perspective of multicultural education. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 17, 1996 to discuss proposed changes in the standards regarding media centers and NLRSD's staff development strategic planning committee. The committee reviewed a video on diversity produced by the Arkansas Elementary Principals Association. 33 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 21, 1996 to discuss the implications of budget cuts on staff development programs and PCSSD's request for unitary status for their staff development program. The committee also discussed the need for computer literacy, technology training, and acquisition of hardware and software by the Districts. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 27, 1996 to discuss available resources concerning sexual harassment. ADE regulations in relation to staff members attending professional association conferences as well as the district staff development and potential sites for training seminars were also discussed. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 30, 1996 to discuss the reconfiguring of Jacksonville Junior High, PCSSD professional development schedules, and APSCN on-line timelines. A tour of the Washington Magnet school was also conducted. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee received a demonstration of UALR's Baum Decision Support Center's capabilities regarding consensus and planning on May 29, 1996. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee did not meet during September, October, and November 1996 because of scheduling conflicts and the extended medical leave of the ADE liaison. On December 18, 1996, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met to discuss the linkage between the Implementation Plan, staff development, and student achievement. On January 21, 1997, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met and discussed sharing middle school strategies and the Districts' training catalogs. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 25, 1997 to discuss their current staff development programs and an overview of the relationship of their current programs with their desegregation plans. 34 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 26, 1997 to observe the Great Expectations Program, a program designed to instill confidence and self-esteem in students at Bale Elementary, one of five schools in the LRSD participating in the program. The principal and mentor teachers provided information on the components and philosophy of the program, and students demonstrated selected components. The PCSSD may adopt the program for selected schools in their district. The committee was provided with an update of pertinent information on resources available to the Districts. The committee decided that the ADE liaison to the committee would gather documentation of completed staff development directly from the Districts, instead of the Districts providing this information at the committee meetings. New information on teacher licensure and rules and regulations was shared with the Tri-District Staff Development Committee at their April 1997 meeting. A report was presented to the committee on information from the Arkansas Council for Social Studies about an October 1997 meeting on integrated curriculum. The Districts will provide principal retreats this summer as a part of their staff development. The PCSSD will sponsor a renowned speaker on strategies to serve at risk youth in August 1997 in which the committee is invited to attend. The LRSD shared survey results from a pilot administration to four teachers in each district. The survey found the sample to be strong in content but lacking in context and process. Plans to address these needs will be developed. In another survey to certified and noncertified LRSD staff, stress management was the major concern. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on May 14, 1997 to participate in a teleconference with the five 1996 awardees of the National Awards Program for Model for Professional Development. The PCSSD shared their summer and fall staff development catalog with the members. The committee will reconvene in the fall of the 97/98 school year. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee is scheduled to meet on September 30, 1997 to discuss collaborative actions for FY 97/98. 35 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 30, 1997 to discuss their staff development for the 1997 /1998 school year. The PCSSD had a pre-school in-service for the faculty, and the LRSD conducted a Principals Academy with an expert on the math and science initiative which lasted several days. The NLRSD is providing staff development by satellite. 'fheTn-bistncfStaff~Develo-pmenf'committee met on October 28, ~ ~ - 1997. The LRSD and NLRSD shared some of their staff development course offerings with the c::pmmittee, and the PCSSD discussed ways of optimizing opportunities for staff development with specific ~mptiasiS..QIJ Jhejun.iQ[JJlgb,~q_hoq_l co_nflict reQlytion training. In November 1997, the Lead Planner provided technical assistance to the certified staff of Central High School regarding data disaggregation, test score analysis and ways to improve student achievement. 36 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS A. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 1. Projected Ending Dates (See dates on individual key activities) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A staff member of the ADE's certification department attended all of the college career days in FY 94/95 in Arkansas and one out-of-state. In FY 95/96, ADE certification staff members attended career and job fairs at the following colleges and universities: Philander Smith College\nUAM\nHSU\nATU\nUCA\nASU\nUA-Pine Bluff\nUA-Fayetteville\nHarding University\nSAU\nand Jackson State. ADE certification staff met with representatives from the Districts to ensure they were aware that ADE personnel were available to provide assistance in recruitment and certification of minority teacher candidates. A job fair was conducted at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff on December 4, 1996. The Districts were advised of the ADE's availability for providing assistance in recruitment and certification. In February 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Henderson State University, Arkansas Tech University, and University of Central Arkansas to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Harding University, UA-Fayetteville, UA-Pine Bluff, and ASU in April 1997 to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. From April 16, 1997 through May 6, 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Philander Smith College and SAU to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. Additionally, ADE staff attended an out-of-state teacher job fair at Jackson State University at Jackson, Mississippi. Recruitment activities were suspended for the summer, but they wi ll resume in the later part of September for FY 97/98. On September 25, 1997, the ADE's Professional Licensure Supervisor attended a career day job fair at Philander Smith College to provide support to the Districts in recruiting teachers. 37 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) A. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) B. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of each year, Districts will supply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subject area. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Letters were sent in May, August, and December 1995 to the Districts requesting information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject areas. In May and November 1996, the Human Resources offices of the Districts were requested to provide information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject area. On February 4, 1997, the ADE again requested that the Districts provide information to ADE regarding teacher shortages. During February 1997, the NLRSD and the PCSSD responded to the ADE regarding teacher shortages. NLRSD teacher shortages are expected in the areas of Special Education, Mathematics, the Sciences, Foreign Language, and English as a Second Language. PCSSD teacher shortages are anticipated in the areas of Foreign Language, Mathematics, the Sciences, and Gifted and Talented Education. On May 20, 1997, information was requested from the Districts regarding teacher shortages. Follow-up letters were sent to the Districts on July 11, 1997 requesting information on teacher shortages that was initially requested in May. 38 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) C. Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request information from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minorityteacher graduates. D. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In May and December 1995, letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas requesting information on minority teacher graduates. Letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas in May and November 1996 requesting information on minority teacher graduates. On May 20, 1997, letters were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs requesting minority teacher graduate information. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In June 1995 and January 1996, ADE sent the information received from Arkansas colleges and universities on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. In July 1996 and January 1997, ADE sent the information received from Deans and Certifying Officers on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. On February 3, 1997, a list of minority teacher graduates from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville was forwarded to the Districts. The information on these graduates was received after the initial list was compiled. The addition of these graduates was sent to the Districts as an addendum to the list of graduates compiled on January 16, 1997. 39 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) D. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The ADE provided the Districts with the Minority Teacher Graduate Report which was compiled from the minority teacher graduate information received from Arkansas colleges and universities in July 1997. E. Each November, ADE will request information from the Districts on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance, including an assessment of the minority teacher candidates' database. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On November 30, 1994, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of the ADE's minority recruitment assistance. Follow-up letters were sent on March 17, 1995 since no responses had been received. Additional follow-up letters were sent to the Districts in August 1995 because the ADE had received no responses from the Districts. A planning and evaluation meeting was scheduled on January 11, 1996 with representatives from the Districts. The Districts did not attend the meeting. In February 1997, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance. The NLRSD and the PCSSD submitted favorable evaluations concerning the effectiveness of the ADE's recruitment assistance efforts. The ADE did not received any information from the LRSD regarding this matter. 40 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES A. Assist ADHE in identifying, analyzing, addressing and eliminating racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. B. Representatives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together, review ADHE's available data to identify racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. Using its knowledge about public schools, teacher education and certification, and through a collaborative effort with the Districts, ADE will analyze racial disparities in ADHE scholarship allocations. ADE will report its findings, conclusions, and recommendations about racial disparities in allocating scholarships to ADHE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X. D. of this report. D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In April 1995, ADE met with representatives of ADHE concerning identification and analysis of possible disparities in scholarship allocations. In June 1995, a collaborative effort was made between the ADE and ADHE to enhance the rate at which minorities were applying for the 1995 teacher scholarships with special emphasis on the areas of science, math, and foreign language through a direct mail program. In July 1995, representatives from the ADE and the Districts met to review the scholarship applications. The Implementation Committee on Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates discussed ways to increase minority awareness of the scholarships available for minority teacher applicants. The committee agreed to meet quarterly to identify, analyze, and address elfminating racial disparities in scholarships. The committee met in December 1995 to discuss the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year. The committee meets on a continuous basis to review scholarship distributions and discuss ways of improving the pool of applicants for minority teacher scholarships as detailed further in Section X. E. of this report. E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 During the May 1995 Legislative session, Acts 188, 189 and 259 regarding scholarships were passed. A meeting to monitor and analyze the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year was held on December 15, 1995. 42 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The committee met on June 7, 1996 to review the scholarship applications for minority teacher candidates for the 96/97 school year. Representatives from the ADHE stated that the ADHE expected to have the resources to fund: 56 scholarships under the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n100 scholarships under the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 13 scholarships under the Minority Masters Fellows Program. The committee also discussed ways of increasing the scholarship applicant pools, and a recommendation was made to make scholarships available to parttime students. In September 1996, a proposal was submitted to the Assistant to the Director for Legislative Services recommending the Legislature offer minority teacher scholarships to part-time students. The committee met on October 23, 1996 to review the scholarships awarded for the 96/97 school year. The following scholarships were funded: 60 scholarships totaling $144,266 for the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n20 scholarships totaling $107,500 for the Minority Masters Fellows Program\n109 scholarships totaling $505,093 for the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 258 students in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Grant Program received scholarships totaling $374,000. In March 1997, information on minority teacher scholarships and how to apply was provided to the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities. The Districts were informed of ADHE's scholarship promotional efforts and legislative updates. The next meeting of the committee will be in September 1997. On April 8, 1997, notifications were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities on the Minority Teacher Scholars Program reminding them that the deadline for receiving applications was June 1, 1997. This information was also provided to the Districts. The Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee will meet on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. 43 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee met on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. The ADHE Assistant Coordinator for Student Financial Aid provided a comprehensive presentation on scholarships awarded for the 97 /98 school year. There were 235 scholarships awarded in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Scholarship program totaling $344,988. The Emergency Secondary Education Loan program awarded 52 scholarships for a total of $119,370. There were 83 scholarships for $403,520 awarded in the Minority Teachers Scholars program. The Minority Masters Fellows program awarded 20 scholarships for a total of $73,750. The ADHE representative indicated that during the 1997 regular legislative session legislation was passed to allow hispanics and asians to participate in the minority scholarship programs. It was stated that the average GPA for minority teacher scholarship recipients had increased to 3.13, and that the dollars awarded in the Minority Masters Fellows program were down from last year because most of the recipients were part-time students. The committee discussed numerous avenues that might be utilized to inform minority applicants of scholarships available. Communication with the faculty of Arl\u0026lt;ansas colleges and universities regarding the availability of scholarships was discussed as a way of infom,ing teaching students of possible resources available to them. The next quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee will be February 19, 1998. 44 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific objectives and timelines). 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The Minority Recruitment Committee met on Friday, April 14, 1995. New committee members were assigned tasks and goals to increase the effectiveness of the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the Minority Recruitment Committee meeting on May 18, 1995, the committee was divided into four working sub-teams to update the annual plan. Each team focused on one of the four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan and monitored specific task completions. From June to October 1995, subcommittees met and worked on monitoring the progress of the ADE in accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Minority Recruitment Plan. In September 1995, the ADE reached an agreement with the Arkansas Statewide Systemic Initiative (ASSI) for conducting an audit of the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee reviewed the recommendations and comments for updating the plan at the November 1995 meeting and reviewed the final draft at the December meeting. The ASSl's audit findings were presented to the committee on January 16, 1996. It was determined during the initial review that the files were incomplete to the extent that an accurate audit was not possible. The auditor met with the committee in March 1996 to review the additional documentation in the files. The auditor prepared the final report in April 1996 indicating that of the 89 actions contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan, 74 of the items had been completed, nine were in progress, and six had not been started. The audit stated that of the 22 items in Goal 1, 15 were completed , one was in progress, and six had not been started. Goal 2 contained 14 items, 13 of which were completed and one in progress. Goal 3 consisted of 30 items with 29 items completed and one in progress. Goal 4 consisted of 23 items with 17 items completed and six in progress. 45 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and timelines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Minority Recruitment Committee met on June 6, 1996 to discuss updates and revisions addressed in the audit and the new racial/gender report on Grades 21 and above. Since the completion of the audit, Goals 2.3.4 and 3.3.8 were completed, and a list of recommendations for retention activities was written. Also, a random sample of ADE employees was asked to fill out questionnaires, but only a limited number were returned. In August 1996, the Minority Recruitment Committee met and discussed the actions necessary to complete Goals 1 and 4 contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the September 1996 meeting, the committee was updated on the progress of all four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee heard an analysis of application and hiring practices and discussed the relevance of the data. Suggestions made by the State Board of Education regarding the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet were discussed at the February 1996 meeting of the Minority Recruitment Committee. Goal 1 of the Minority Recruitment Plan will be completed when the employee tracking sheet is finalized. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on March 14, 1997 and March 27, 1997 to discuss the draft Revised Minority Recruitment Plan and progress toward completing Goal 4. The committee passed a motion to omit Section 1.1 from Goal 1 of the draft revised plan. Additionally, the committee suggested that communication be made an integral part of each goal of the revised plan. The committee discussed the need for professional training programs, incentives for educational opportunities, and upward mobility for all staff within the ADE. In an effort to complete Goal 4, a representative from the ADE communication section presented development costs for media materials to the committee. Additionally, a representative from the ADE MIS section discussed the possibility of using the network to disseminate information to employees. It was suggested that the committee continue to receive assistance from MIS on the orientation video. 46 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and timelines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued} In an effort to represent all sections within the ADE, the committee recommended that representatives from the ADE communication and MIS sections be added as members to the committee. Currently, neither section is represented on the committee. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on April 18, 1997 to discuss the need to revise the action steps for each of the committee's four goals. The committee decided to schedule a two-day retreat in an effort to review all goals and actions. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on May 19, 1997 to discuss the agenda for the annual retreat and revisions to the action plan emphasizing recruitment and retention at all grade levels. A two-day annual retreat was held on June 18-19, 1997 at the Teacher Retirement Building. The retreat facilitated the revision of the Minority Recruitment Committee's action plan for their four goals. Dr. Gary Chamberlain, UALR faculty member, served as the facilitator. The revised plan was distributed to the Minority Recruitment Committee at their July 18, 1997 meeting for final approval before it is submitted to the administrative team and the State Board of Education. The Minority Recruitment Committee meeting scheduled for September 12, 1997 was rescheduled for September 30, 1997 due to members scheduling conflicts. The meeting will be reported in the November PMT. !the Minorily'7Recruitmen Committee met wifh fhe ADE Deputy pirector i~ November 1997 to provide him w~IJ..@-copy of th~ revised plan and fe,_~iye_his i11pJ.Jt .Qn the plan. B. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 47 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) 8. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 As of August 1995, the ADE had hired or transferred 38 employees in Grades 21 and above in the General Education Division. This group was composed of 11 black females, 5 black males, 16 white females, 4 white males, 1 other female, and 1 other male. The racial composition of the these employees was 52.6 percent non-minority and 47.4 percent minority. As of October 1995, there were 161 filled positions in the GED in Grades 21 and above. There were 27 minorities or 22.9 percent in Grades 21 and above. An analysis on Goal 1 regarding application and hiring practices was presented at the September 1996 meeting. Samples of graphs and tables for presenting the data were distributed at the meeting. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on December 13, 1996 to discuss the latest draft of the ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The committee recommended various format changes including the addition of a table of contents and an executive summary. The committee met on January 17, 1997 to continue the discussion on the draft ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum agreed with all but three of the committee's recommendations for the employee tracking sheet. He requested that the committee continue discussions on this matter. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on February 14, 1997 to discuss the status of the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The employee tracking sheet will enable the committee to monitor the recruitment and retention of minority employees by unit and section at every grade level and monitor minority representation at all grade levels within the ADE. The committee also discussed the lack of minority employees in some areas and the loss of several minority employees. There were also discussions regarding the possibility of revising the new Minority Recruitment Plan that has been submitted to the ADE administrative team. 48 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) B. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The committee received information on Arkansas pupil enrollment by race at their March 14, 1997 meeting. Arkansas enrollment figures for October 1, 1996 revealed that 73. 7% of all students are white, 23.4% are black, 1.8% are hispanic, 0.7% are asian, and 0.4% are native american. In an effort to assess the effectiveness of the action steps for each goal, agenda items are being developed for the committee's June retreat. The committee recommended that invitations be sent to Senator Beebe, Julie Cullen, Gene Wilhoit, and all State Board members. At the May 1997 Minority Recruitment Committee meeting, the committee discussed reviewing the most recent quarterly hiring and retention report and revisions to the action plan at the annual retreat. Discussions during the July retreat focused on the current plan, the original purpose of the plan, and necessary changes with input provided by committee members and speakers from the Arkansas Department of Higher Education, Employment Securities, and the ADE. 49 XII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION A. Improve the effectiveness of the ADE's existing rules, regulations, and site evaluation form for assessing the desegregation impacts of school construction between school districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XII.C. of this report. B. Review existing rules, regulations and site evaluation forms and their application to school construction projects within districts and between districts. 1. Projected Ending Date October 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for th is item is detailed under Section XII.C. of this report. C. Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses the impacts on racial balances of individual school sites within the three districts. 1. Projected Ending Date October 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 ADE's School Site Selection Committee met on April 21, 1995 to revise the proposed rules and regulations. The proposed rules and regulations were presented to the State Board of Education on May 8, 1995. The Board voted to table the decision on public comment until the proposed rules and regulations were reviewed by the Attorney General's Office. The Attorney General's Office reviewed the revised school construction draft and provided a letter of approval. 50 XII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION (Continued) C. Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses the impacts on racial balances of individual school sites within the three districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On June 12, 1995, the State Board of Education voted to place the revised School Site Approval rules and regulations for public comment. The hearing was held on June 19, 1995 in the ADE Auditorium, and a copy of the revised draft was sent to all school districts in an ADE Director's Memo. Proposed rules and regulations underwent a third revision and were presented to the Board in July 1995 with a request for final approval. The revised rules and regulations were approved by the State Board of Education on July 10, 1995. On August 3, 1995, the proposed School Site Approval rules and regulations were reviewed by the Legislative Council. Due to questions raised by the staff attorney for the Legislative Council, the council voted to defer review until their next meeting so that additional information could be obtained to resolve the questioned items. The proposed School Site Approval rules and regulations were reviewed by the Legislative Council on September 7, 1995 and went into effect on September 8, 1995. Goal completed. No additional reporting required. 51 XIII. ASSIST PCSSD A. Detennine if the PCSSD wants and needs assistance in lowering the cost of Black History course offerings to its certified staff. 8. 1. Projected Ending Date April, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A letter was mailed to the desegregation director of the PCSSD on March 16, 1995 regarding offering assistance in facilitating a special arrangement with colleges and universities for reducing the cost of a black history course offering to the PCSSD certified staff. In a letter dated April 3, 1995, the PCSSD responded that their staff development director was working with UALR to develop the black history course offerings. No additional assistance was requested of the ADE. Goal completed as of June 1995. If PCSSD wants assistance, communicate with local colleges and universities to facilitate the Black History course offerings to PCSSD teachers at the lower costs possible. 1. Projected Ending Date September 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 UALR informed the ADE that they had contacted PCSSD regarding their willingness to provide non-credit black history studies for the PCSSD. UALR indicated that as of November 11, 1994 they had received no response from the PCSSD. Two universities offered assistance in providing teachers in the PCSSD a black history course. The ADE had not received requests for any assistance with the facilitation of a black history course in the PCSSD as of February 27, 1995. On April 3, 1995, the PCSSD informed ADE that its staff development director was working with UALR to develop the black history course offering. No additional assistance was requested of the ADE. 52 XIV. SCATTERED SITE HOUSING A. Through Executive Branch communication procedures, ADE will inquire about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about the availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered-site housing. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The ADE had previously inquired about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered site housing. All materials were distributed to the appropriate district representatives. There has been no contact with the PCSSD on Scattered Site Housing since July 1995. Goal completed. No additional reporting required. 53 xv. STANDARDIZED TEST SELECTION TO DETERMINE LRSD LOAN FORGIVENESS A Meet with and propose to the representatives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the District's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. 1 . Projected Ending Date May 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On April 21, 1995, a letter was sent to the LRSD Superintendent suggesting meeting dates to discuss the variables which affect student achievement. On May 1, 1995, the ADE Director was advised of the need to discuss the selection of the SAT-8 to measure the LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness threshold of the Settlement Agreement. On May 21, 1995, the ADE staff discussed the status of the selection of the test relevant to the ADE's Implementation Plan. The Variables Committee, a subcommittee of the Test Selection Committee, received evaluations on the relationship of the various types of scores that could be used on the SA T-8 Test. The Variables Committee recommended using the state-adopted norm referenced test to determine the achievement levels of black and white students. Based on the evaluations, they indicated that scaled scores or raw scores would appear to be the better metrics to use for this purpose. The recommendation from the Variables Committee was submitted to the Test Selection Committee and the ADE Director on July 28, 1995. Until the test validation has been completed, no additional progress can occur on this objective. For the progress being made on the test validation process see Section VII. of this report. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team. Additionally, the LRSD Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation was provided a copy of the test validation report. 54 XV. STANDARDIZED TEST SELECTION TO DETERMINE LRSD LOAN FORGIVENESS (Continued) A. Meet with and propose to the representatives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the Districts' progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that the district had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The Director of the ADE indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the Director of the ADE, ADE Assistant Director of Technical Assistance, and ADE Assistant Director of Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for the meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. In February 1997, a memorandum was sent to the Assistant Directors of Technical Assistance and Planning and Curriculum which summarized the test validation and variables subcommittee work and outlined the next step of formalizing an agreement with the LRSD on the use of the SAT-8 and the choice of raw or scaled scores as the metric. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow ADE to move forward in this matter. In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. 55 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS A. Fully implement the Extended COE Improvement Plan Process in all schools in the three Pulaski County school districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI.D. of this report. 8 . Conduct the Extended COE School Improvement Plan peer review process in 20% of the schools each year (every school every five years) and provide peer review team recommendations to the schools reviewed. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI. D. of this report. C. Receive from all schools, annual reports on progress toward meeting recommendations of School Improvement Plans. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI.D\nof this report. D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In June 1995, ADE personnel reviewed the Extended COE packet and prepared for holistic reviews of the Cycle 5 schools. 56 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In July 1995, year-end reports were finalized by the field service specialists. Plans to conduct holistic reviews of the draft school improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools, and plans for the 95/96 school year were discussed. In August 1995, holistic reviews of the Cycle 5 school improvement plans were conducted. A school improvement conference was conducted, and documentation for technical review visits in the 95/96 school year was discussed. In October 1995, computer programs used by Effective Schools proponents were ordered for review, and a draft monitoring checklist for ECOE was developed. In November 1995, two meetings were held to plan for 95/96 monitoring. Onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits, and technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, technical assistance visits were conducted, and monitoring occurred in all schools in the Districts. As of December 31, 1996, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored, and technical review visits continued. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits in the Districts were completed. The field service specialists completed the midyear monitoring reports and prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. In March 1996, unannounced visits and peer team two-day visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Written reports of two-day team visits were prepared, and field service specialists provided assistance to schools on their school improvement plans. In April and May 1996, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and monitoring forms were scanned for inclusion in the July monitoring report. Team visits were completed, and the annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. 57 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, the data from the announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed with the Court, and copies were distributed to the parties. Information was included on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. All school improvement plans were monitored in the Cycle 5 schools. Reports regarding the two day team visits were included in the Semiannual Monitoring Report. In August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts regarding announced monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations on the monitoring schedule and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed with tentative training schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, a meeting was held with the Districts to identify, update, and modify the schools in Cycles 1 - 5. Monitoring packets for the Cycle 1 schools were presented during the Principal's Monitoring Workshops. Technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 1 schools regarding their school improvement goals. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996, and technical assistance was provided to schools in realizing the goals established in their school improvement plans. In December 1996, the field service representatives completed the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools and provided assistance to the schools in achieving their school improvement goals. The ECOE monitoring reports on the Cycle 1 school improvement plans were included in the Semiannual Monitoring Report and presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties in January 1997. 58 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In February 1997, the field service specialists prepared for the spring peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools and prepared the annual NCA reports. The NLRSD Cycle 1 ECOE team visits were completed in March 1997. Cycle 5 schools submitted their progress reports from their FY 95/96 team visits, and the outcomes will be reviewed and compiled for inclusion in the PMT after all have been received. Assistance was provided to the Districts based on the results of monitoring visits and specific requests. Team visits were completed in April 1997 for the PCSSD. The LRSD prepared for their team visits, and Cycle 5 school progress reports were received. Assistance was provided to the Districts based on the monitoring reports and specific requests. An expanded team meeting of Team Vwas held on April 7, 1997 to provide training for monitoring activities and evaluating school improvement plans during team visits. A presentation was made on Act 338 of 1991 . ECOE team visits were scheduled, and all Cycle 1 peer team external visits were conducted as of May 1997. Assistance was provided based on the results of the monitoring visits and specific requests. As of June 1997, all Cycle 1 schools had their ECOE team reports provided to them for their review, and information was mailed to the Cycle 5 schools regarding their progress reports. Assistance was provided based on information received in progress reports or specific requests. The July 15-17, 1997 School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs and emphasized the COE school improvement process. The conference focused on Phase II of COE and the need for the continuation of school improvement. The field service specialists provided technical assistance throughout the conference on school improvement activities and plans and answered questions from delegates. As of August 1997, dates for the ECOE team visits of the Cycle 2 schools were established for FY 97/98, and progress reports were in the final stages. Technical assistance was provided as progress reports were evaluated and when specific requests were made. 59 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) Technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals at the Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop held on September 10, 1997. In October 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted along with the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools. The field service representatives discussed the ECOE process with principals, ECOE steering committees, and faculty and worked with teachers on analyzing perceptual surveys. Additionally, the field service representatives emphasized the need for a database on achievement and provided guidance regarding their school improvement plans. fn November 1997, teclinfcai reviews 'of the- ECOE process'were conducted along with the announced mon~ori,ng v)sits of the Cycle 2 schools. 60 XVII. DATA COLLECTION A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Data was collected in May 1995 from all schools during the unannounced visits. Information that was unavailable during the announced visits was collected during the unannounced monitoring visits. In June 1995, data was collected from the Districts and analyzed for inclusion in the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. In July 1995, data from perceptual surveys was reviewed. In August 1995, the data elements to be reviewed and the data collection process for FY 95/96 were articulated to the Districts. In September 1995, the data collection format for the 95/96 school year was distributed to the Districts. Financial information for FY 93/94 and FY 94/95 was requested from the Districts, and principals were given inservice training regarding FY 95/96 monitoring. The Districts provided fourth quarter data on discipline, testing, nonpromotes, and budget for inclusion in the February 1996 Semiannual Monitoring Report. A workshop to develop a common terminology for monitoring purposes was conducted on October 17, 1995 with the Districts. The workshop identified the data available in the Districts to fulfill the requirements of the Allen Letter's 14 elements. The group correlated the data elements to the five monitoring forms. Monitoring data was verified for inclusion in the February Semiannual Monitoring Report. Data on nonpromotes was analyzed for inclusion in the February Semiannual Monitoring Report. Announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995. The preliminary February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were presented to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education. Announced monitoring visits were completed on January 26, 1996. Unannounced monitoring visits began in late February 1996 for the Cycle 5 schools in the Districts and were completed in April 1996. 61 XVII. DATA COLLECTION (Continued) A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31 , 1989 Monitoring Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) A supplemental report to the February 1, 1996 Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed with the Court on April 8, 1996. Data requests for information were forwarded to the Districts. Information was reviewed, analyzed, and formatted for inclusion in the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. The data received from the Districts was analyzed and reviewed. Instructional program reporting was clarified after the Districts and ADE desegregation staff collaboratively established a definition. All data collected for the July 1996 Semiannual Report was disaggregated, analyzed, and displayed in color graphic form for reporting. In August 1996, the Districts were provided with the monitoring requirements and expectations for the 96/97 school year. In September 1996, arrangements were made for data collection, and monitoring formats were revised. Technical assistance was provided to the LRSD on data collection and formatting of certified staffing data. Monitoring packets for the Cycle 1 schools were developed in October 1996 and presented during the Principal's Monitoring Workshops. In November 1996, data specified by the Allen Letter was received, reviewed, and formatted for the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In December 1996, the remainder of the quantitative data specified in the Allen Letter was reviewed and formatted for inclusion in the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was finalized in January 1997 and presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee of the Arkansas General Assembly, and the parties. In February 1997, the Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring Section developed the format for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and obtained Cycle 1 SAT-9 test data from the ADE's Assessment Section. 62 XVII. DAT A COLLECTION (Continued) A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In March 1997, data forms were sent to the Districts to assist with the submission of information for the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. Some data was collected through existing reports submitted by the Districts for the annual report. In April 1997, the Districts were notified that the deadline for data collection submission was April 24, 1997. ADE desegregation staff received training on software useful in desegregation reporting. As of May 14, 1997, all data was received from the Districts. In June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized and presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee on June 25, 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the Court and copies were distributed to the State Board of Education and the parties. In August 1997, data requirements for the February 1998 monitoring report were sent to the Districts. In September 1997, Cycle 2 principals and the Districts' superintendents were provided with the data requirements for monitoring and data analysis. In October 1997, the financial information requested for inclusion in the February 1998 monitoring report was received from the Districts. 63 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served by first class mail on this 25th day ofNovember, 1997, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2000 Boatmen's Bank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026amp; Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION JAN 5 199B OfFICE OF DESEGREGATION M0NITORJNQ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for December, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 ~ NOV!!Jl~t 1997, 9istnbutiQ[IL\u0026lt;\u0026gt;t St!'@EsfuaJi?\nitiqn 1:_un.~ih9. foJ,.E.Y ~ll98 were ~s f9ll0~: LRSD- $15,293,336 NfRSD:. $8,824,2\u0026amp;,\\ PCSSD-$20,149,352 iThe allotments of State Equalization Funding calculated for FY 97/98 ~t November 3Q, 1997, subject tQ periodic adjustments, were as follows: CR\"sD - $42,056,681 ~LRSO -0$24,266,733 PC.SSD -$55,41..0,722 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 eased on_ the information available, the ADE calculated at November 80, 1997(or FY 97/~8, sul?_ject to periodic aclj!,l~tments. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Last day of each month, August - June. Actual as of December 31, 1997 13ased_.~m) Qe informati~ availa6ie, t ~,7'-1:fE,JalcOlateaffat NQYeQ1bfil !f0,i1997 for FY 9]/9,!!,\n:.subject !2 periopif aojustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distributions for FY 97/98 at November 32, 1997 totaled $3,273,756. ~llotment calculated at November 1997 for FY 97/98 was\"$9\n002,821 , subject to 'periodic agju~!ments. =- -~ -\" . M - -- H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. J . 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Qistri6ution.sJQ(E.Y. 977gs a_rr:.to,i.E! 99,7\ntwer~: l!'RSD ._.,,$-1, 064\".'439 NLRSD - $434,833 i:\u0026gt;csso- $1)4s.zo2 !fhe allotments calculated for FY\"\"97/98 at Nov~oer\"30: 1~97, subject to periodic ~djustments, were: LRSD- $3,548,125 NLRSD - $1,416,112 PC_SD - $5,82,2,342 Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1997, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 97/98 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance was notified to pay the first onethird payments for FY 97/98 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function. L. ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget. M. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1~7, General FipF,ice, \"J_aciethe ~_[st one-thlro ~a.yment~ to the Qi~trict~J2r their,FY: 9,7/98 tra!!p.Qrt~tiol budget ~! Nov~ffi!:\u0026gt;.er 1~fil,Jh~ folfowiQg ha''o't\neen p1Ja~forJ::Y:El't98: ~ RSD-$1,019,861.33 LRSD- $141,696.00 CSSD,.:,.153(?,541 QQ ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD- 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. S. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The LRSD received $3,000,000 in June 1997. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $15,000,000 in loan proceeds. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 8 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. 9 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of program. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Quantitative and qualitative indicators were displayed with specific information provided on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to 11 Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) As of June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. Copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available for the Districts to review on July 10, 1997 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The purpose of the review was to provide the Districts an opportunity to review the report prior to submitting it to the Court. Desegregation monitoring staff members were available to answer questions. Representatives from each district participated. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for 55 educators from the Districts was held September 10, 1997. Monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits were discussed. As of October 1997, 10 of the Cycle 2 announced monitoring visits were completed, and 36 technical assistance visits were conducted. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff. Deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues were discussed regarding the completion of the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. ffl December f997 I technlciia sslstance \"'v1s1ts\" w~re\" conaucted if.egardif!9 ,team_,xi~ts,.,and tectlpig:al re'!J,,ew re. comm,e11dations, anfl pies of the infusion document and ~pe~iual SJ!~ ~ er~ .LOVi~,JQ\n_sro29lsJ n t eE OE,\n\u0026gt;r~,- 11 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 12 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. 13 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91- 67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 14 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1155","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Badgett Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Hardin Bale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Baseline Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Booker T. Washington Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Brady Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Carver Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Central High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Chicot Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Cloverdale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Students","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1155"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["264 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nBadgett Elementary, Bale Elementary, Baseline Elementary, Booker Elementary, Brady Elementary, Carver Elementary, Central High, Chicot Elementary, Cloverdale Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nPOSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 10 0 9 0 0 5.00 50.00 00 45.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 54.55 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 55.00 55.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 9 0 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 26.67 60.00 00 13 .33 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 15 00 15 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.67 86.67 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 19 0 11 14.29 54.29 .oo 31.43 0 .oo 0 .oo 35 35 % BLACK 68.57 68.57 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 20 4 1 0 0 40 87.5% P4 13 21 0 2 0 0 36 94.4% SP 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 100.0% 01 18 15 0 1 0 0 34 97 .1% 02 17 12 0 2 0 0 31 93.5% 03 12 9 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 04 9 7 3 3 0 0 22 72. 7% 05 10 11 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 06 13 10 0 0 0 0 23 100.0% Total 113 107 7 11 0 0 238 92.4% 47.5% 45.0% 2.9% 4.6% .0% .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K PHILLIPS T. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% K WILLIS C. 1 8 11 1 20 95.0% P4 GADDY G. 1 7 10 17 100.0% P4 TRAYLOR K. 1 6 11 2 19 89.5% 01 BROOKS D. 1 8 6 1 15 93.3% 01 MCGOWAN D. 1 10 8 18 100.0% 02 MCLENNAN A. 1 9 6 2 17 88.2% 02 SINGER P. 1 8 6 14 100.0% 03 CAMPBELL E. 1 12 9 1 22 95.5% 04 HESSELBEIN A. 1 8 7 3 3 21 71.4% 04 PRUITT G. 1 1 1 2 100.0% 05 ALBERT R. 1 10 11 1 22 95.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 05 06 06 PRUITT G. PRUITT G. TRIMBLE 8. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 3 2 13 BF 1 10 WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 23 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% TOTALS 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 3 1 2 0 0 12 75.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 2 8 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100.0% AMBASSADORS 2 8 2 1 13 76.9% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 3 4 1 3 11 63.6% 1 1 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 4 3 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 100.0% LIBRARY MONITORS 2 5 1 8 87.5% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 4 3 2 9 77. 8% 1 1 100.0% FIRE MARSHALLS 2 1 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 19 32 8 10 69 73.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black CITZ OF WEEK K .0% CITZ OF WEEK 1 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 2 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 3 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 4 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 5 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 6 .0% HONOR ROLL K .0% HONOR ROLL 1 .0% - HONOR ROLL 2 .0% HONOR ROLL 3 .0% HONOR ROLL 4 .0% HONOR ROLL 5 .0% HONOR ROLL 6 .0% HONOR ROLL SC .0% PERFT ATTEND K .0% PERFT ATTEND 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 2 3 4 5 6 SC 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% HANDBOOK 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% RECRUITMENT 1 2 3 6 50.0% 2 3 1 6 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 16 18 OM OF Total % Black 35 48.6% BM 3 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 5 7 24 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA PET HUMAN RELATIONS COOP. LEARNING. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 7 9 16 6 45 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CULTURAL RELAT MULTICUL CURR. TOTAL 2 3 5 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 8 CONFLICT MGMT. 5 TOTAL 28 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK TOTAL 6 6 PAGE 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE POSITION BL A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 5 1 11 0 0 17 29.41 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 6 2 22 0 0 30 20.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 20.00 6.67 73.33 00 00 30 20.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 19.05 52.38 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 3 1 1 1 9 2 21 00 21 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 00 88.89 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 4 17 2 28 7.84 33.33 3.92 54.90 0 .00 0 .oo 51 51 % BLACK 41.18 41.18 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 20 5 4 4 0 52 75.0% P4 7 10 6 3 8 2 36 47.2% SP 3 2 1 0 0 0 6 83.3% 01 14 25 6 0 2 2 49 79.6% 02 19 19 4 4 1 1 48 79.2% 03 15 18 3 3 1 1 41 80.5% 04 17 16 4 4 0 0 41 80.5% 05 19 14 8 8 1 2 52 63.5% 06 19 14 1 2 2 0 38 86.8% Total 132 138 38 28 19 8 363 74.4% 36.4% 38.0% 10.5% 7.7% 5.2% 2.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% K HUTTO M. 1 6 6 2 1 2 17 70.6% K LITTELL T. 1 7 7 3 17 82.4% K SEILER D. 1 1 1 100. 0% K SHUTE K. 1 6 6 3 2 17 70.6% P4 GEURIN R. 1 4 5 3 2 3 1 18 50.0% P4 JOHNSON c. 1 3 5 3 1 5 1 18 44 .4% 01 BALENKO M. 1 7 13 3 1 1 25 80.0% 01 BROWN C. 1 7 12 3 1 1 24 79.2% 02 CONLEY F. 1 10 9 1 2 1 1 24 79.2% 02 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 TALLEY H. 1 9 10 3 1 23 82.6% 03 CUNNINGHAM L. 1 8 8 2 2 1 21 76.2% 03 FUNK P. 1 7 10 1 1 1 20 85.0% 03 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 FRANCIS L. 1 10 7 1 2 20 85.0% 04 UNDERWOOD-MOR L. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% 04 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 DOCKERY M. 1 10 6 4 4 1 25 64.0% 05 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TARKINGTON R. 1 9 7 4 3 2 25 64.0% 06 NELSON J. 1 10 8 2 20 90.0% 06 ROSBY K. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 06 SEILER D. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 33.3% Specific Learning Disability 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 8 4 5 4 0 0 21 57.1% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 14 7 10 6 0 0 37 56.8% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 14 12 3 5 1 1 36 72.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 20 16 4 6 1 3 50 72. 0% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Tutors 3 8 1 2 1 1 16 68.8% 1 1 100.0% Conflict Manager 11 4 1 2 18 83.3% 1 1 100.0% Sign-a-Thon 1 1 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 - H 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% HOST \u0026amp; HOSTESSES 11 8 1 4 24 79.2% 1 1 100.0% RECORDER .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 47 39 8 20 2 4 120 71. 7% 6 3 9 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERF ATT pERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's HIGHEST ACA GRADE BM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN SUNSHINE SUNSHINE CITIZENSHI,P GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE MOST IMPR LIFE PRIN AW TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 3 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR G/T BM BF WM WF 1 2 1 1 1 2 OM OF Total 2 3 3 % Black 50.0% 66. 7% .0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 4 1 2 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 8 % Black 50.0% 62.5% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCHOOL IMPROV CO RECRUITMENT COMM DISCIPLINE HEAR! 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 3 3 Black 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 WM WF 1 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 3 5 Black 66.7% 60.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TITLE I PLANNING EMERGENCY CRISIS GREAT EXPECTATIO BM BF WM WF 2 2 2 6 3 5 OM OF Total % Black 8 25.0% 5 40.0% 7 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC BLACK HISTORY PUPIL SERVICE TE BM BF 1 3 2 WM WF 2 1 5 OM OF Total 3 4 7 % Black 33.3% 75.0% 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARTNERS IN EDUC 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 100.0% MEMBERSHIP 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% ROOM MOTHERS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PTA COUNCIL 1 1 100.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% HOSPITALITY 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 100. 0% TOTAL 25 2 35 62 40.3% 4 15 3 8 30 63.3% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 5 5 TESA 9 RACE RELATIONS 5 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 38 5 1 CULTURAL RELAT. 2 AT RISK 16 PRESCHOOL INSERV 22 OPEN COURT 24 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 18 2 14 TOTAL 103 64 17 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 12 CYCLE 1 5 CYCLE 2 2 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 1 1 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 NEW BRIDGE 28 TRAINER OF TRAIN 2 CURR COMPACTING 1 TRI-D GIT 1 ADADE COMP/ENRI 1 NATL FACU INSTIT 3 CRITICAL/CREATI 1 Reading/Spelling 24 TOTAL 62 24 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 5 CLASSROOM MGMT. 20 1 POS CLASS MGMT 14 VIOLENCE PREVEN 1 MANAGER CONFLICT 1 STRESS MANAGEMEN 28 CLASSROOM MODIF 23 PS GRADES 1-6 12 PS SUPPORT STAFF 11 COOP TEAM LEARN 1 SP ED DISCIPLINE 1 PLAYGRD DISC TOTAL 117 1 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 2 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-..97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LEARN DISABIL 26 2 GANGS 26 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 26 LEARNING STYLES 26 SELF ESTEEM/ELE 16 MOTIVATION 28 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 33 3 READING/METRA 15 BEGIN YEAR STAFF 24 24 4 10 FRIST AID 4 1 PS K-12 INSTR A 7 2 ABACUS 27 2 LR-CDA TRAINING 2 G/E SP.EDU 22 INSTRU AIDES 4YR 2 2 INCLUSION (K) 3 SHURLEY 8 TEST DATA 15 New Teacher Trai 2 Marva Collins Se 5 TOTAL 242 116 19 18 BASELINE POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 9 1 8 0 0 18 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 15 2 12 0 0 29 51. 72 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 51.72 6.90 41.38 00 00 29 51. 72  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100. 00 MEDIA CLERK 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SECRETARY 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 1 9 0 0 0 0 10 100.00 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 16 0 3 0 1 23 82.61 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13.04 69.57 00 13 .04 00 4.35 23 82.61  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 3 31 2 15 5.77 59.62 3.85 28.85 0 .oo 1 1. 92 52 52 65.38 65.38   01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 28 0 5 3 1 54 83.3% P4 11 16 4 2 1 1 35 77 .1% SP 2 4 1 0 1 0 8 75.0% 01 25 19 3 4 3 1 55 80.0% 02 16 16 1 2 0 1 36 88.9% 03 17 23 0 5 3 1 49 81.6% 04 14 7 3 2 0 0 26 80.8% 05 17 11 4 2 0 2 36 77.8% 06 15 13 0 1 1 0 30 93.3% Total 134 137 16 23 12 7 329 82.4% 40.7% 41. 6% 4.9% 7.0% 3.6% 2.1%  01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K CLEVENGER s. 1 5 7 12 100.0% K JAMES M. 1 5 5 3 1 1 15 66.7% K LOVE B. 1 3 7 1 l 12 83.3% K SELF E. 1 4 8 1 1 14 85.7% P4 HILL D. 1 6 8 2 1 17 82.4% P4 SMITH M. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% 01 BELIN P. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 01 DEATON B. 1 10 7 2 1 20 85.0% 01 GARNER D. 1 7 5 3 1 1 17 70.6% 01 LAMB A. 1 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 02 BELIN P. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 02 SHARP c. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 THOMAS B. 1 8 9 1 18 94.4% 03 GLASON D. 1 8 12 2 2 1 25 80.0% 03 GRIMM B. 1 9 11 3 1 24 83.3% 04 BELIN P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 HUFFMAN C. 1 14 7 3 2 26 80.8% 05 HOOVER P. 1 8 6 2 1 1 18 77.8% 05 TATUM V. 1 9 5 2 1 1 18 77.8% 06 BOWMAN R. 1 7 6 1 14 92. 9% 06 PEARSON M. 1 8 7 1 16 93.8%  01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Multihandicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 3 0 2 0 0 10 80.0% TOTALS 12 4 0 2 0 0 18 88.9%  01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 4 11 0 1 0 0 16 93.8%  01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 2 3 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 03 1 3 4 100.0% 05 2 2 4 100.0% 06 1 1 .0%  01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Safety Patrol 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Tutors .0% .0% Morning Announce 2 1 3 66. 7% 1 1 100.0% Ambassadors 3 3 1 2 1 10 60.0% 1 1 .0% STOP Club 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Honors Club .0% .0% Just Say No 13 7 3 1 1 25 80.0% .0% Fire Marshals 3 3 6 100.0% .0% Student Council 5 5 2 1 1 1 15 66. 7% 2 2 .0% Drill Team 1 17 1 19 94. 7% 1 1 100.0% Student Represen 17 2 1 20 85.0% 2 2 100.0% Dance Team Rep 7 16 3 2 1 29 79.3% 1 1 100.0% Choir .0% 2 1 3 66.7% TOTAL 40 72 15 19 10 11 167 67 .1% 7 1 5 13 53.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's K 4 2 6 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors K 5 7 12 100.0% All A's ls 2 10 1 13 92.3% A \u0026amp; B Honors ls 8 7 2 1 18 83.3% All A's 2n 2 1 3 66.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors 2n 2 5 2 1 10 70.0% All A's 3r 2 2 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 3r 5 2 2 1 10 70.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 4t 1 5 1 7 85.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors St 3 1 4 75.0% All A's 6t 2 1 3 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 6t 4 2 6 66.7% TOTAL 31 48 3 10 2 94 84.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS 2 2 1 2 2 100.0% 4 50.0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1  11/03/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 3 2 2 3 6 33.3% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Pupil Services BM BF 1 2 3 WM WF 2 2 2 OM OF Total 3 4 5 % Black 33.3% 50.0% 60.0% BM 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 2 OM  2 OF Total 2 2 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC Discipline Sunshine BM BF 2 3 3 WM WF OM 1 1 3 OF Total 3 % Black 66.7% 3 100.0% 7 42.9% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE School Safety STUDENT COUNCIL FIELD DAY BM BF 5 2 4 WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 5 Black 83.3% 66.7% 80.0% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROFESSIONAL GRO STOP COTILLION PROGR BM BF 1 1 2 WM WF 1 3 1 OM OF Total 2 4 3 % Black 50.0% 25.0% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .\u0026gt; 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLACK HISTORY MO COE SCHOOL RECRUITME BM BF 2 1 2 WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total 4 3 3 % Black 50.0% 33.3% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3  6 OF Total 3 % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM TOTAL 39 2 24 OF Total % Black 65 60.0% BM  11/03/97 PAGE 7 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 5 10 17 41. 2% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 20 Curriculum Study Leadership Acad 1 Mastery Learning Multi-C Counsel. Abacus 20 PET 25 WHOLE LANGUAGE 2 COOP LEARNING 15 SAT -8 TEST INTE 20 SDDI 20 COE 20 PATHWAYS TO EXCE 20 AR READING ASSO. 3 TOTAL 76 103  11/03/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 13 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 11/03/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 26 CYCLE 1 17 CYCLE 2 8 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 15 ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULTURAL DIVERS! 1 LEARNING STYLES 4 TOTAL 72  PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97  PAGE 1 Ba)KER -    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 12 1 18 0 0 32 40.63 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 17 6 26 0 0 50 36.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.00 34.00 12.00 52.00 00 00 so 36.00  POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES OTHER LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 6 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.18 68.18 00 13. 64 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7 4 1 2 1 1 5 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 85.71 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 86.36 86.36  POSITION TOTAL PERCENT  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 32 6 29 6.94 44.44 8.33 40.28 0 .OD 0 .oo 72 72 % BLACK 51.39 51.39    01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 22 17 18 1 2 77 50.6% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 20 26 12 13 2 1 74 62.2% 02 16 27 15 21 5 1 85 50.6% 03 23 22 20 17 1 2 85 52.9% 04 22 24 18 21 1 3 89 51. 7% 05 27 21 22 20 1 4 95 50.5% 06 29 20 19 25 2 1 96 51.0% Total 154 162 123 135 13 14 601 52.6% 25.6% 27.0% 20.5% 22.5% 2.2% 2.3%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROWN M. 1 3 7 5 5 20 50.0% K HURST M. 1 4 6 4 4 1 19 52.6% K JEFFRIES v. 1 5 4 4 4 2 19 47.4% K WALLS B. 1 5 5 4 5 19 52.6% 01 FARLEY J. 1 6 5 3 5 19 57.9% 01 HESTIR J. 1 5 7 4 2 1 19 63.2% 01 JONES A. 1 5 6 1 4 1 17 64.7% 01 HARRIS K. 1 4 8 4 2 1 19 63.2% 02 FAIR D. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAVES I. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 HIGDON T. 1 4 6 3 6 2 21 47.6% 02 TAGGART M. 1 4 7 3 5 2 21 52.4%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 ELLINGTON L. l 6 5 5 4 l 21 52.4% 03 FUTRELL C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 22 50.0% 03 HALLUM A. 1 5 6 5 4 1 21 52.4% 03 TUCKER T. 1 6 6 5 4 21 57 .1% 04 AUSTIN C. 1 5 6 5 6 1 23 47.8% 04 ELLINGTON L. 1 1 1 .0% 04 HARDING C. 1 7 5 4 4 1 21 57 .1% 04 HAYDEN D. 1 5 6 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 TAYLOR c. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 HIPPS D. 1 7 6 6 5 1 25 52.0% 05 JOHNSON M. 1 7 5 6 5 1 24 50.0% 05 KELLEY C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 2 24 45.8%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 LEHNHOFF D. 1 7 5 5 5 22 54.5% 06 COLFORD S. 1 7 6 4 7 24 54.2% 06 HARRIS P. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 06 HARRIS K. 1 1 1 .0% 06 NEWCOMB D. 1 8 4 5 6 1 24 50.0% 06 WEIR N. 1 7 5 4 7 1 24 50.0%   01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 5 2 4 1 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 8 3 5 1 0 0 17 64.7%   01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 13 15 31 23 2 4 88 31. 8%   01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 3 1 1 5 80.0% 01 2 1 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 .0% 03 2 1 3 66.7% 04 1 1 100.0%   01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 27 21 14 31 2 2 97 49.5% 1 1 2 50.0% Jazzy Jaguars 18 11 18 14 3 64 45.3% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Helpers 6 10 7 10 1 1 35 45.7% 1 1 2 50.0% BAMBIS 12 12 12 12 48 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council .0% 2 2 .0% Fire Marshal ls 1 2 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DARE 24 28 20 20 2 1 95 54.7% 1 3 4 25.0% TOTAL 89 84 73 89 5 7 347 49.9% 1 6 9 16 43.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF BIRACIAL P.T.A. BOARD MBR Discipline Hear 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 2 2 8 Black 50.0% .0% 50.0% BM 1 2  10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 4 2 2 17 4 25 Black 50.0% 24.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Field Day Parent Involment Reading BM 1 BF 2 1 2 WM WF 3 4 1 OM OF Total 5 6 3 % Black 40.0% 33.3% 66.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 5  2 OF Total 9 % Black .0% .0% 44.4%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Awards/Honors School Spirit Science Fair BM BF 2 1 1 WM 1 WF 2 5 2 OM OF Total % 5 6 3 Black 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 7 3 WM 2 WF OM 4  3 OF Total % 11 5 Black 63.6% 60.0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Behavior Mange. COE BM 1 1 BF WM 4 3 1 1 WF 3 2 2 OM OF Total % 7 4 7 Black 57 .1% 25.0% 57 .1% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 2  4 OF Total % 6 Black .0% 66.7% .0%   01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners In Ed 1 1 2 50.0% .0% School Safety 2 1 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TOTAL 6 22 5 32 65 43 .1% 7 20 7 28 62 43.5%  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 39 TESA 31 HUMAN RELATIONS 47 TEAM BUILDING 50 TOTAL 167  10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 10  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CYCLE 1 23 CYCLE 2 6 CYCLE 3 8 COOP. LEARNING 48 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 TOTAL 89  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. 42 TOTAL 42  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Learning styles 48 Testing 50 TOTAL 98  PAGE 1 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 8 1 18 0 0 00 29.63 3.70 66.67 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 18 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 27 00 27 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 29.63 29.63 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 2 12 1 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 11. 76 70.59 5.88 11. 76 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 2 1 1 5 4 17 00 17 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.35 82.35 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 2 20 2 20 4.55 45.45 4.55 45.45 0 .oo 0 .oo 44 44 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 17 5 10 1 2 54 66.7% P4 4 5 4 4 1 0 18 50.0% SP 6 0 1 1 0 0 8 75.0% 01 26 20 6 8 1 1 62 74.2% 02 21 16 11 10 3 2 63 58. 7% 03 21 15 9 2 1 1 49 73.5% 04 17 8 3 4 6 7 45 55.6% 05 18 9 4 8 3 2 44 61.4% 06 5 10 6 0 4 3 28 53.6% Total 137 100 49 47 20 18 371 63.9% 36.9% 27.0% 13.2% 12.7% 5.4% 4.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DUGAN F. 1 7 6 1 4 1 19 68.4% K JONES P. 1 5 4 4 3 16 56.3% K TOLBERT I. 1 7 7 2 1 1 18 77.8% K WASHINGTON M. 1 1 1 .0% P4 MCCLURKAN E. 1 4 5 4 4 1 18 50.0% 01 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 KOON B. 1 1 1 .0% 01 ROSE s. 1 9 7 2 1 1 20 80.0% 01 SCRUBBS v. 1 8 6 2 4 20 70.0% 01 WASHINGTON M. 1 9 7 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 CROMEDY G. 1 6 5 3 2 2 1 19 57.9% 02 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 HARROD A. 1 8 6 3 5 22 63.6% 02 KOON B. 1 7 4 5 3 1 1 21 52.4% 03 JOHNSON D. 1 13 9 2 1 25 88.0% 03 OLIVERS. 1 8 6 7 2 1 24 58.3% 04 GOVAR M. 1 8 3 2 3 5 21 52.4% 04 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 2 100.0% 04 YOUNGE. 1 9 5 1 1 6 2 24 58.3% 05 HANNAHS B. 1 10 4 2 2 2 20 70.0% 05 HIGHT R. 1 8 5 2 6 1 2 24 54.2% 05 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 06 HANNAHS B. 1 1 1 100.0% 06 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Count Black 06 VARDAMAN T. 1 5 9 6 4 3 27 51. 9% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 2 3 1 0 11 45.5% Visually Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 10 1 3 5 1 0 20 55.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 5 8 2 5 0 25 40.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 2 100.0% 01 2 1 3 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 6 3 4 4 17 52.9% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILITATOR 10 9 2 3 1 3 28 67.9% 1 1 .0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 18 10 7 6 6 5 52 53.8% 1 1 .0% BRADY SCH.CHOIR 9 9 5 6 5 5 39 46.2% 1 1 .0% GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENT 5 5 8 2 5 25 40.0% 1 1 .0% DRILL TEAM 14 4 5 23 60.9% 2 2 100.0% CHAPTER I READIN 36 18 5 3 3 7 72 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHAPTER I MATH 22 18 5 4 5 5 59 67.8% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 10 9 3 2 1 4 29 65.5% 1 1 .0% AMBASSADORS 7 5 4 4 1 1 22 54.5% 1 1 .0% CONFLICT MANAGRS 15 10 3 2 6 1 37 67.6% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 138 110 46 40 33 36 403 61.5% 4 11 15 26.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Imp Aca K- 3 1 1 8 13 30.8% Prine. (A's) 1- 8 9 10 10 8 4 49 34.7% Hon.Rol(A/B) 1- 34 21 13 12 3 14 97 56.7% Citizenship P- 58 37 20 23 11 20 169 56.2% Attendance P- 30 25 12 9 8 17 101 54.5% Most Imp Cit K- 3 6 2 6 2 5 24 37.5% TOTAL 136 99 57 61 32 68 453 51. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MEM 1 1 1 3 6 33.3% 1 2 1 3 7 42.9% VIPS/P.I.E 1 1 2 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO SCH.RECRUIT TEAM BM BF 2 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % 5 Black .0% .0% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TEXTBOOK SELECT BUILDING COORDIN STAFF DEV COMM BM BF 3 2 WM WF 1 1 3 2 OM OF Total % 1 7 4 Black 42.9% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GUIDANCE COMM FIELD DAY MEDIA CONSULTANT BM BF WM WF 3 1 4 4 1 OM OF Total 7 5 1 % Black 42.9% 20.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TALENT SHOW STUDENT COUNCIL PUPIL SERVICES BM BF WM WF 2 3 2 2 4 OM OF Total % 4 2 7 Black 50.0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 1 1 Black 2 50.0% 1 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SUNSHINE COMM DISCIPLINE MANAG GRANT WRITING BM BF WM WF 1 4 1 6 1 1 OM OF Total 7 6 1 % Black 14.3% 66.7% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 7 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black GRADE LEVEL CH 3 4 7 42.9% .0% MULTICULTURAL CM 2 6 8 25.0% .0% TOTAL 2 30 6 49 87 36.8% 2 9 1 9 21 52.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 14 TESA 12 RACE RELATIONS 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 10 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 2 3 PRE SCHOOL INSER 12 15 SCHOOL LAW 12 COE 15 READING STYLES 13 MULTICULT ED 10 6 BRADY MISSION ST 11 EARLY CHILDHOOD 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 128 16 9 4 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING WINNEBAGO COMPUTER PROGRAM LIBRARY IN SERV WINDOWS 95 WORDS 1 WORDS@ POWER POINT 1 POWER POINT 2 TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 10 6 2 12 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 49 9 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 14 CLASSROOM MGMT. 15 POSITIVE DISCIP. 4 SCHOOL LAW 12 SCHOOL WIDE DISC 9 6 6 CLASSROOM MANAG 15 TOTAL 65 4 6 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 14 LEARNING STYLES 20 SELF ESTEEM 8 2 4 PORTOFOLIO ASSES 16 1 INTERGRAT CURRIC 12 ABACUS TRAINING 14 WINDOW ON SCIENC 8 2 PARENT INVOLVE 8 2 SIP 5 1 1 TEACHER EVALUAT 6 1 COMPUTER INSERV 10 9 1 2 MATH MANIULATIV 9 8 ESL/LEP 9 30 1 3 SELF ESTEEM 8 5 WRIT ACROSS CURR 9 REACH INSERVICE 12 SCIENCE HANDS-ON 13 2 AR K-4 CRUSADE 1 POLAROID CAMERA 2 EARLY CDLHD CONV 4 SOC STUD INSERV 25 26 SUCCESS FOR ALL 15 TOTAL 206 103 10 10 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE CURRICULUM SPECIALIST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 23 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 33 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 13 1 30 0 1 46 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.17 28.26 2.17 65.22 00 2.17 46 % BLACK 00 100.00 24.24 50.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 16.00 60.00 00 24.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 5 5 1 2 1 5 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 50.00 00 60.00 83.33 76.00 76.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 28 1 36 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7.04 39.44 1.41 50.70 0 .oo 1. 41 71 71 % BLACK 46.48 46.48 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 9 21 16 10 2 1 59 50.8% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 21 16 19 11 1 1 69 53.6% 02 22 23 26 16 1 2 90 50.0% 03 29 19 19 19 3 1 90 53.3% 04 32 20 25 11 1 5 94 55.3% 05 31 19 25 21 2 2 100 50.0% 06 24 26 20 22 0 2 94 53.2% Total 168 144 150 110 10 14 596 52.3% 28.2% 24.2% 25.2% 18.5% 1. 7% 2.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DANIELS. 1 4 7 5 2 1 1 20 55.0% K DOYNE A. 1 3 7 6 4 20 50.0% K HOOKER M. 1 2 7 5 4 1 19 47.4% 01 GLENN L. 1 7 5 6 4 1 23 52.2% 01 HAMPTON H. l 7 5 7 3 1 23 52.2% 01 SKUBAL E. 1 7 6 6 4 23 56.5% 02 JOSEPH J. 1 6 6 7 4 23 52.2% 02 SMITH-MALLETT G. 1 6 7 6 2 1 22 59.1% 02 MCKENDRY S. 1 5 6 6 6 23 47.8% 02 YARBROUGH L. 1 5 4 7 4 1 1 22 40.9% 03 CARTWRIGHT J. 1 6 5 5 4 2 22 50.0% 03 HURD L. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 MUNNS P. 1 9 5 4 4 22 63.6% 03 PENN P. 1 7 4 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 BUCK v. 1 9 5 6 2 1 23 60.9% 04 HARRISON K. 1 8 5 6 4 1 24 54.2% 04 JESTER J. 1 8 4 6 3 1 2 24 50.0% 04 MUNNS P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 WASHINGTON K. 1 7 5 7 2 1 22 54.5% 05 BLANKENSHIP K. 1 8 4 6 5 1 1 25 48.0% 05 GLENN B. 1 8 4 7 5 1 25 48.0% 05 HARNESS E. 1 8 6 5 5 1 25 56.0% 05 PACE T. 1 7 5 7 6 25 48.0% 06 BYRD D. 1 6 6 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Teacher 06 06 06 FLEMING L. SHIELDS H. THOMAS V. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 6 6 5 6 23 52.2% 6 7 5 5 1 24 54.2% 6 7 5 6 24 54.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPR03 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 87.5% TOTALS 11 1 2 1 0 0 15 80.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 29 20 52 45 3 9 158 31.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 1 3 66.7% 01 1 1 .0% 02 1 1 1 3 33.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE  1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FIRE MARSHALS 2 1 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO 23 27 22 21 1 94 53.2% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 2 3 7 1 14 21. 4% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 4 8 7 9 1 29 41.4% 1 1 2 50.0% AMBASSADORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% MATH OLYMPAID .0% 1 1 .0% SCIENCE CLUB 4 3 3 3 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% NEWS TEAM 4 5 5 4 1 19 47.4% 1 1 .0% ODESSY OF MIND .0% 1 1 .0% THINKING CAP QUI 2 2 3 5 1 2 15 26. 7% 1 1 .0% SUMMER READING 37 36 13 6 92 79.3% 2 1 5 8 25.0% MATH FAIR .0% 1 1 .0% INVENT AMERICA .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCIENCE FAIR .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPACE FAIR .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black CARDINAL CLUB 9 8 6 23 39.1% .0% TOTAL 77 93 65 63 2 5 305 55.7% 10 1 17 28 35.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black COURT. KIDS K .0% COURT. KIDS 1 .0% COURT. KIDS 2 .0% COURT. KIDS 3 .0% COURT. KIDS 4 .0% COURT. KIDS 5 .0% COURT. KIDS 6 .0% A HONOR ROLL lS 9 7 15 10 1 1 43 37.2% A/B HONOR RL lS 8 9 3 1 21 81.0% A HONOR ROLL 2N 5 8 15 12 2 42 31.0% A/B HONOR RL 2N 11 7 1 3 1 1 24 75.0% A HONOR ROLL 3R 6 4 18 7 1 5 41 24.4% A/B HONOR RL 3R 9 7 3 4 23 69.6% A HONOR ROLL 4T 4 6 13 15 2 2 42 23.8% A/B HONOR RL 4T 12 7 10 4 33 57.6% A HONOR ROLL ST .0% A/B HONOR RL ST .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A HONOR ROLL 6T .0% A/B HONOR RO 6T .0% TOTAL 64 55 78 56 7 9 269 44.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 7 12 41. 7% VIPS 1 1 1 1 4 25.0% 2 2 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PUPIL SERV. TEAM LEADERSHIP COE RECRUITMENT TEAM 2 4 2 1 5 10 2 7 15 4 Black 28.6% 26.7% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black .0% 33.3% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % STP CONSULT TEAM BCC HONORS COMMITTEE 5 2 2 1 2 7 2 3 1 13 7 5 Black 38.5% 28.6% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % GIT SCH. COMMITT HEALTH ACTION TM COURT. KIDS 4 2 2 1 6 1 10 3 3 Black 40.0% 66.7% 66.7% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM 4 OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 28 6 41 2 77 36.4% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 5 8 2 18 33 39.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 42 TESA 32 RACE RELATIONS 17 HUMAN RELATIONS 17 CULTURAL RELAT. 12 AT-RISK 25 TOTAL 145 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 3 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 32 11 5 34 2 2 84 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 30 1 CLASSROOM MGMT. 33 GOALS OF MISBEHA 40 5 POSITIVE DISPLIN 40 5 GREEN CIRCLE 4 TOTAL 147 11 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LITERATURE BASED 22 BALANCED WRITING 2 WHOLE LANGUAGE 21 WRITE MORE LEARN 2 MAST/FOSS TRAIN! 20 WRITE GRP WKSP 7 LEARNING STYLES 8 ADD/ADHD 8 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 5 INTEGRATING CURR 29 HAT TRAINING 3 MATH/LANG ART PR 33 DEFIANT CHILD 46 SCHOOL IMPROVEME 48  MULTIPLE INTELLI 49 AETN-CRIT. VIEW! 45 ECOE INTRODUCTIO 40 TEACH SELF DISC! 45 MC RAT 5 3 DISCIPLINE MGMT 8 CMSIMON AWARD 2 EXPANING REACH 2 PATHWAY TO EXCEL 43 G/T IDENTIFICATI 40 LRSD SCIENCE 30 TOTAL 563 3    POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE AUXILIARY TEACHER SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 10 17 11 37 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 POSITIONS 16 31 21 47 0 0 13.91 26.96 18.26 40.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 1 5 75 10 6 2 4 1 3 3 1 2 115 00 115 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 60.00 36.00 80.00 33.33 00 50.00 00 33.33 00 00 50.00 40.87 40.87 NO\\I 4 i997 Qrr\\CE Of DtSEGl\\tGA110N MOtU10RING POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY SECURITY OFFICER SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 14 17 1 8 0 2 SUBTOTAL PERCENT QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 11 13 1 1 7 5 1 42 33.33 40.48 2.38 19.05 00 4.76 42 % BLACK 66.67 72.73 92.31 00 00 42.86 100.00 100.00 73.81 73.81 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 30 48 22 55 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.11 30.57 14.01 35.03 0 .oo 1. 27 157 157 % BLACK 49.68 49.68 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 20 12 0 0 0 1 33 97.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 10 210 246 113 127 8 7 711 64 .1% 11 160 204 122 148 10 5 649 56 .1% 12 104 139 93 100 7 10 453 53.6% Total 494 601 328 375 25 23 1846 59.3% 26.8% 32.6% 17.8% 20.3% 1.4% 1. 2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADAIR G. 1 4 3 1 8 87.5% ATKINS L. 1 41 59 21 15 1 137 73.0% BECKER M. 1 15 38 37 53 1 144 36.8% BLAIR S. 1 5 1 2 8 62.5% BLEVINS P. 1 26 36 23 30 1 1 117 53.0% BOYETTE. 1 26 57 24 32 1 140 59.3% BRACK R. 1 28 72 5 16 2 1 124 80.6% BRANDON E. 1 44 43 12 5 4 108 80.6% BROADNAX-THRA B. 1 52 52 10 10 1 125 83.2% BROOKS S. 1 34 50 20 11 1 1 117 71.8% BROWN J. 1 9 12 37 45 5 5 113 18.6% CALDWELL s. 1 4 12 24 54 3 7 104 15.4% CALLAWAY N. 1 32 33 18 22 2 1 108 60.2% CARR P. 1 37 52 21 18 2 130 68.5% CARUTH P. 1 11 16 26 39 2 3 97 27.8% CHAMBLISS P. 1 12 17 14 38 3 4 88 33.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black CHANDLER J. 1 40 44 12 10 2 108 77.8% COBB J. 1 4 10 35 52 6 9 116 12 .1% COLBURN M. 1 19 46 31 35 2 3 136 47.8% COLE J. 1 15 18 16 38 2 3 92 35.9% COLLINS R. 1 45 49 13 9 2 118 79.7% COONS. 1 39 17 35 45 2 138 40.6% COOPER V. 1 33 41 24 27 3 2 130 56.9% CORTINEZ K. 1 23 34 33 47 2 1 140 40.7% COX B. 1 40 49 21 22 132 67.4% DANIEL B. 1 7 6 44 19 5 7 88 14.8% DAVIS M. 1 48 33 6 6 3 96 84.4% DEITZ s. 1 19 17 24 19 2 8 89 40.4% DIXON s. 1 40 47 16 13 2 2 120 72.5% DONHAM M. 1 13 29 30 42 2 2 118 35.6% DUMAS E. 1 1 1 100. 0% EASTER M. 1 12 24 29 51 2 2 120 30.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDWARDS J. 1 38 42 19 26 1 126 63.5% EVANS K. 1 25 33 18 12 88 65.9% FIELDS W. 1 21 31 7 1 1 61 85.2% FITZPATRICK Jo. 1 44 48 28 30 150 61. 3% FUTRELL B. 1 32 60 10 21 1 124 74.2% GADBERRY s. 1 6 15 37 69 3 4 134 15. 7% GADDY H. 1 25 11 1 1 38 94.7% GATES K. 1 18 36 33 47 3 137 39.4% GAY A. 1 39 45 21 21 4 130 64.6% GRAY J. 1 58 37 10 2 2 1 110 86.4% GUY K. 1 1 1 100.0% HALL-JONES B. 1 28 9 2 39 94.9% HAMMONS K. 1 41 30 8 8 2 89 79.8% HARDIN G. 1 13 18 30 33 4 3 101 30.7% HARGIS A. 1 9 18 36 69 1 2 135 20.0% HARRIS H. 1 44 32 17 29 3 3 128 59.4% LR~D ' SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HOFFMAN M. 1 27 37 21 19 1 3 108 59.3% HOLLADAY K. 1 28 37 24 36 125 52.0% HOWARD R. 1 8 3 11 100.0% HUFFORD G. 1 6 16 36 49 5 6 118 18.6% JAMES B. 1 1 1 100.0% JERNIGAN R. 1 31 47 21 24 1 124 62.9% KALB M. 1 33 33 23 29 1 3 122 54 .1% KEARNEY L. 1 11 11 39 24 3 1 89 24.7% LENIEAR H. 1 34 40 23 25 1 123 60.2% LIGON M. 1 11 16 31 24 1 2 85 31. 8% LOYA s. 1 23 43 20 30 1 117 56.4% MAYS G. 1 33 43 18 26 4 124 61. 3% MCDONALD D. 1 34 33 23 14 2 106 63.2% MCDONALD T. 1 2 12 11 14 39 35.9% MCLENDON J. 1 43 40 25 27 1 1 137 60.6% MCMURRAY v. 1 42 48 20 25 1 136 66.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MEADOWS M. 1 43 44 13 3 2 105 82.9% BARNUM R. l 3 12 3 18 83.3% BERRY D. 1 10 4 3 17 82.4% EACKLES v. 1 6 6 100.0% GRUMMER JR c. 1 7 2 2 2 13 69.2% BURCHETT s. 1 12 12 100.0% PERRY M. 1 11 9 3 23 87.0% SKIPPER J. 1 30 6 3 39 92.3% SODERLING L. 1 38 38 100.0% TENPENNY A. 1 6 14 20 100.0% MCCREE D. 1 3 3 100.0% MILES B. 1 6 3 9 100. 0% PRATHER L. 1 26 2 28 92.9% MILLER B. 1 51 41 12 11 1 1 117 78.6% MILLER R. 1 28 48 24 19 6 125 60.8% MOORE K. 1 32 50 23 27 1 133 61. 7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C'S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MORRIS W. 1 1 1 100.0% NASH L. 1 41 45 15 4 1 106 81.1% NASH D. 1 33 41 27 23 124 59. 7% PAIGE JR w. 1 38 28 31 6 4 107 61.7% PAULS. 1 31 54 21 11 2 119 71. 4% PAXTON v. 1 40 53 12 10 2 117 79.5% PEYTON E. 1 27 39 26 6 98 67.3% PIERCE M. 1 40 45 15 15 1 116 73.3% PIERCE s. 1 49 44 8 7 1 109 85.3% PITTMAN c. 1 7 20 30 61 1 119 22.7% POST J. 1 62 29 2 1 94 96.8% REEDY J. 1 32 51 18 25 2 2 130 63.8% ROBERTSON JR T. 1 26 46 13 2 1 88 81.8% ROBINSON c. 1 17 30 12 5 1 65 72. 3% ROUSSEAU N. 1 3 4 5 3 15 46. 7% RUTLEDGE M. 1 34 52 20 21 2 1 130 66.2% LR$D  SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SCHLESINGER D. 1 35 12 5 4 1 57 82.5% SEWARD D. 1 44 49 15 14 2 1 125 74.4% SHOFNER K. 1 43 44 15 18 1 121 71.9% SIEGEL L. 1 35 48 18 24 3 3 131 63.4% SIEGEL T. 1 3 1 4 .0% SNODGRASS A. 1 44 47 14 6 1 112 81.3% STAFFORD B. 1 27 51 19 24 3 2 126 61. 9% STEADMAN A. 1 14 32 29 44 2 4 125 36.8% TEETER E. 1 52 40 9 14 2 117 78.6% THOMAS A. 1 58 so 13 1 122 88.5% THOMPSON F. 1 56 47 3 2 6 114 90.4% THOMPSON J. 1 19 32 38 49 2 1 141 36.2% THOMPSON L. 1 11 41 32 46 2 4 136 38.2% THREATT c. 1 42 48 20 10 1 121 74.4% VENABLE G. 1 13 67 4 2 1 2 89 89.9% WALKER R. 1 30 49 14 27 2 1 123 64.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WATSON B. 1 8 15 37 54 4 3 121 19.0% WHISTLE V. 1 38 58 17 15 128 75.0% WHITEHORN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% WILDER B. 1 22 37 18 23 2 1 103 57.3% WILLIAMS B. 1 1 1 .0% WILLIAMSON M. 1 22 8 2 32 93.8% WILLIAMS G. 1 20 11 2 33 93.9% WILLIS E. 1 37 34 18 11 100 71.0% WILSON C. 1 37 40 20 28 1 1 127 60.6% WILSON N. 1 34 22 23 40 2 3 124 45.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 11 5 0 0 0 0 16 100.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 35 25 9 4 0 0 73 82.2% Speech or Language Impaired 7 6 0 1 0 0 14 92.9% TOTALS 54 36 10 5 0 0 105 85.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 78 136 119 163 10 6 512 41. 8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 10 22 19 3 1 1 46 89 .1% 11 15 13 4 1 1 34 82.4% 12 3 2 5 100.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 94 151 71 99 5 11 431 56.8% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 51 30 14 9 1 66 39 77 .1% 11 27 11 11 1 38 12 76.0% 12 13 10 2 2 15 12 85.2% MATH 10 41 24 8 2 49 26 86. 7% 11 21 21 8 3 1 30 24 77.8% 12 6 13 2 3 1 8 17 76.0% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 47 30 11 2 1 59 32 84.6% 11 5 6 9 14 6 55.0% 12 13 4 3 3 16 7 73.9% SCIENCE 10 16 16 5 3 1 22 19 78.0% 11 15 14 7 1 22 15 78.4% 12 9 11 2 5 11 16 74 .1% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 20.0% Math 1 1 3 5 40.0% Science 2 2 3 7 28.6% Social Studies 1 1 2 .0% Foreign Language 5 1 6 .0% TOTAL 1 4 3 16 1 25 20.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 53 17 70 75.7% 4 4 .0% Drill Team 26 26 100.0% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 1 7 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Govt 4 14 6 3 2 1 30 60.0% 1 1 .0% TAILS 10 39 2 11 62 79.0% 2 1 3 6 33.3% FCS 1 5 14 45 65 9.2% 1 1 . 0% German Club 7 10 25 13 2 2 59 28.8% 1 1 .0% Young Democrats 3 11 11 39 1 4 69 20.3% 2 2 .0% French Club 5 17 20 32 2 1 77 28.6% 2 2 .0% CCE 5 13 8 1 27 66.7% 1 1 100.0% DECA 4 15 4 23 82.6% 1 1 100.0% FBLA 21 44 5 1 71 91. 5% 3 1 4 75.0% Accpt No Bound 10 22 22 47 6 8 115 27.8% 1 1 2 .0% Rotary Interact .0% 1 1 .0% Ladies Club .0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 41 1 42 97.6% 1 1 100.0% Troubadours 10 23 22 30 2 4 91 36.3% 3 1 3 7 42.9% Beta Club 5 27 50 108 8 9 207 15.5% 2 2 .0% Basketball 27 21 3 3 54 88.9% 2 2 100.0% Volleyball 7 13 20 35.0% 1 1 .0% Baseball .0% 2 2 100.0% Soccer .0% 1 1 .0% Golf .0% 1 1 .0% Tennis .0% 1 1 .0% Track .0% 1 1 .0% Madrigals 7 6 3 16 81. 3% 1 1 100.0% Nat.Honor.Soc. 2 14 21 42 4 4 87 18.4% 2 2 .0% Science Club 1 4 12 31 5 3 56 8.9% 1 1 2 .0% Latin Club 1 4 9 13 1 28 17.9% 1 1 .0% VICA 6 8 7 1 22 63.6% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ASO 8 5 2 15 86.7% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 232 342 251 454 33 38 1350 42.5% 8 13 12 24 1 58 36.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Supt. Honor 4 13 21 1 5 44 9 .1% A Honor Roll 1 9 36 64 7 10 127 7.9% B+ Honor 7 38 38 88 2 7 180 25.0% B Honor Roll 30 57 38 49 4 5 183 47.5% TOTAL 38 108 125 222 14 27 534 27.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT .0% .0% PTSA BOARD 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 6 50.0% GIFTED/TALENTED 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLDGS/GROUNDS HOSPITALITY LIBRARY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 1 WM 1 WF 3 12 5 OM 2 OF Total 6 14 6 % Black 33.3% 14.3% 16.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROJECT GRAD. SENIOR ACTIV. TEACHER APPREC. BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 6 3 6 WM WF 19 12 32 OM 3 OF Total % 25 15 38 Black 24.0% 20.0% 15.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SCHOOL SAFETY HEALTH/WELLNESS AR/DRUG FREE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 4 1 WM WF 3 3 5 OM 4 OF Total 4 7 6 % Black 25.0% 57 .1% 16. 7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BOOSTER CLUB PUBLIC RELATIONS TOTAL BM 2 BF WM WF 3 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 4 10 50.0% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 31 2 108 143 23.1% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 58 TESA 66 COOP. LEARNING 59 LEARN STYLES 3 VARIOUS OTHERS 8 TOTAL 194 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 38 CYCLE 1 9 CYCLE 2 7 CYCLE 3 7 VARIOUS COURSES 13 TOTAL 74 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 38 CLASSROOM MGMT. 61 ALT ASSESSMENT 18 CONFLICT MGMT. 35 VARIOUS COURSES 11 TOTAL 163 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Content Area TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 48 5 48 5 PAGE 1 ffiICXJI'    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 8 2 14 0 0 24 33.33 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 33.33 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 14 3 24 0 0 42 35.71 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.38 33.33 7 .14 57.14 00 00 42 35.71 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 1 0 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 7 0 4 0 2 13 53.85 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 60.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 12 0 3 30 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13. 33 36.67 00 40.00 00 10.00 30 50.00 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 25 3 36 6.94 34.72 4.17 50.00 0 .oo 3 4.17 72 72 41.67 41.67 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 23 16 6 6 3 5 59 66 .1% P4 11 7 10 6 1 1 36 50.0% SP 7 6 4 2 1 0 20 65.0% 01 26 25 10 8 4 2 75 68.0% 02 21 30 7 6 5 5 74 68.9% 03 25 26 8 6 6 1 72 70.8% 04 28 19 8 9 3 0 67 70.1% 05 24 23 5 7 2 1 62 75.8% 06 27 21 11 4 4 3 70 68.6% Total 192 173 69 54 29 18 535 68.2% 35.9% 32.3% 12.9% 10.1% 5.4% 3.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K ZINAMON B. 1 1 1 100.0% K KERR P. 1 8 4 2 2 1 3 20 60.0% K MURPH K. 1 8 6 2 2 1 1 20 70.0% K SABO D. 1 7 6 2 2 1 1 19 68.4% P4 BARRE F. 1 6 4 5 3 18 55.6% P4 MIMS S. 1 5 3 5 3 1 1 18 44.4% 01 DAVIS L. 1 9 9 3 2 1 1 25 72. 0% 01 ELLIS s. 1 7 9 4 4 1 25 64.0% 01 ZINAMON B. 1 1 l 100.0% 01 TEETER P. 1 10 7 3 2 2 1 25 68.0% 02 EANS s. 1 8 9 2 2 1 3 25 68.0% 02 NEAL L. 1 7 9 3 2 2 1 24 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 WELLS J. 1 6 12 2 2 2 1 25 72.0% 03 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 100. 0% 03 HOLLINGSWORTH J. 1 7 9 3 2 3 1 25 64.0% 03 ZINAMON 8. 1 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 03 ROSES. 1 9 9 3 2 2 25 72.0% 03 WILLIAMS F. 1 9 8 2 2 1 22 77.3% 04 BEDOW L. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 04 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 04 ISBELL P. 1 11 5 2 3 21 76.2% 04 SHANKS B. 1 10 5 2 3 3 23 65.2% 04 WILLIAMS E. 1 7 9 4 3 23 69.6% 05 BEDOW L. 1 1 1 100. 0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 BRYANT G. 1 7 9 1 3 20 80.0% 05 GALYEAN N. 1 9 6 1 1 2 1 20 75.0% 05 HARDESTY S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 05 JOHNSON J. 1 8 8 3 3 22 72. 7% 06 BEDOW L. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 06 CHILCOTE M. 1 8 10 4 1 23 78.3% 06 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 .0% 06 MALLETT O. 1 9 5 3 2 2 1 22 63.6% 06 PETTUS I. 1 10 6 4 2 1 2 25 64.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 33.3% Mentally Retarded 3 2 1 1 0 0 7 71. 4% Multihandicapped 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 50.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 9 6 3 1 0 28 64.3% Visually Handicapped 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% TOTALS  19 17 10 8 3 0 57 63.2% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 22 9 7 0 0 47 66.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 1 5 60.0% 01 1 1 2 2 1 7 28.6% 02 1 1 2 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Ambassadors 12 16 4 5 1 38 73.7% 1 l 2 50.0% Cafeteria Monit. 3 1 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council 6 14 5 1 26 76.9% 1 2 1 4 8 37.5% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% Fire Marshall 6 3 2 4 15 60.0% 1 1 .0% Quiz Bowl Team .0% .0% Peer Tutor's 4 8 2 6 1 21 57 .1% 1 1 2 50.0% Broadcast Team 2 2 2 1 1 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Cheerleaders 7 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 .0% Tchr of Tomorrow .0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 34 51 16 20 2 2 125 68.0% 1 7 1 10 1 20 40.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL 59 113 34 39 6 251 68.5% PERFECT ATTE 76 88 29 22 4 219 74.9% TOTAL 135 201 63 61 10 470 71.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 4 1 OM 4 1 OF Total % Black .0% 9 55.6% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Parent Recruit. BM BF 1 2 2 WM 1 WF 2 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 2 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 5 1 5 OM OF Total % Black 12 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 3 6 6 15 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. AUTISM WORKSHOP MATH TASK JOSTENS LG. ARTS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 4 7 10 1 10 5 24 13 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT ESL METHODS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 42 9 43 25 85 34 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 12 12 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SCH. IMPROVE. SCH. EMERGENCY 45 23 SCH. TESTING 23 1 COMPUTER TRAIN TOTAL 68 24 CLOVERDA1E POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 3 14 1 14 0 0 9.38 43.75 3.13 43.75 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 24 2 1 1 1 1 1 32 00 32 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 50.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 53.13 53.13 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 9 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 20.00 60.00 00 20.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 1 1 1 5 4 15 00 15 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 80.00 75.00 80.00 80.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 6 23 1 17 12.77 48.94 2.13 36.17 0 .oo 0 .oo 47 47 % BLACK 61.70 61.70 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 30 35 0 4 1 1 71 91. 5% P4 12 16 4 0 0 3 35 80.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 43 35 2 4 2 3 89 87.6% 02 32 38 3 1 0 1 75 93.3% 03 39 24 2 1 0 1 67 94.0% 04 25 35 1 2 0 0 63 95.2% 05 27 24 3 2 0 0 56 91.1% 06 21 31 1 0 1 0 54 96. 3% Total 229 238 16 14 4 9 510 91. 6% 44.9% 46.7% 3.1% 2. 7% .8% 1.8% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K EPPERSON B. 1 8 6 2 1 17 82.4% K HALLS. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% K MILLER G. 1 7 12 19 100.0% K ROLAX S. 1 8 8 2 18 88.9% P4 BUETTNER s. 1 9 6 1 2 18 83.3% P4 ROGERS C. 1 3 10 3 1 17 76.5% 01 COKELEY G. 1 12 6 1 1 1 1 22 81.8% 01 HENTHORNE M. 1 9 10 1 1 21 90.5% 01 SHUFFIELD K. 1 10 10 1 1 22 90.9% 01 SNOWDEN S. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 WALKERS. 1 11 8 2 1 22 86.4% 01 WINEK. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 SNOWDEN s. 1 12 11 1 24 95.8% 02 VANECKO A. 1 10 14 1 25 96.0% 02 VINSON W. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 WINEK. 1 10 12 2 1 25 88.0% 03 MCCLAIN M. 1 12 8 2 1 23 87.0% 03 TRIPCONY w. 1 12 6 1 19 94. 7% 03 WHITED. 1 15 10 25 100.0% 04 MURDOCK S. 1 10 10 1 2 23 87.0% 04 STUART D. 1 11 11 22 100.0% 04 VINSON w. 1 4 14 18 100.0% 05 BANKS B. 1 15 10 1 2 28 89.3% 05 WILSON S. 1 12 14 2 28 92.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 POSITION V. MILLS R. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 12 9 BF 14 17 WM WF 1 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 27 27 96.3% 96.3% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 7 1 1 0 0 16 87.5% TOTALS 10 10 3 1 0 0 24 83.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 11 19 0 1 0 0 31 96.8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 6 3 1 10 90.0% 01 3 3 1 7 85.7% 02 3 3 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 11 12 1 24 95.8% 2 1 3 66.7% AMBASSADORS 9 12 2 1 24 87.5% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 8 10 4 2 24 75.0% 1 1 2 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 10 11 1 1 1 24 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% STRAIGHT TALK 70 8 1 79 88.6% 3 3 100.0% POP TALK 72 3 2 77 93.5% 3 3 100.0% BASKET BALL 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 100. 0% GIFTED PROGRAM 11 18 4 1 34 85.3% 1 1 .0% M \u0026amp; M CLUB .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 129 135 22 8 2 3 299 88.3% 6 8 4 18 77.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD ALL A's ALL A's \u0026amp; B PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP MOST IMPROVE TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black SUNSHINE 1 5 6 16. 7% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 1 1 OF Total % 4 Black .0% 75.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black HOSPITALITY 1 3 2 6 66.7% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% DISCIPLINE 4 1 4 9 44.4% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STAFF DEVELOPMEN 1 1 3 5 40.0% .0% PARTNER IN EDUC 1 1 2 4 50.0% .0% POSITIVE ATTITUD 1 7 1 9 88.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GRANT WRITING PRIN ROUND TABLE TALENT SHOW BM BF 1 6 3 WM WF 1 2 5 1 OM OF Total % 2 12 5 Black .0% 50.0% 80.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% . 0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE COTILLION BCC CARNIVAL BM BF 1 4 4 1 WM WF 1 1 OM OF Total % Black 4 100.0% 6 2 83.3% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCIENCE FAIR SCHOOL PAPER BIRACIAL 1 2 1 2 2 Black .0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % Black 4 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 6 39 3 35 83 % Black 54.2% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 6 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black 63.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 16 TESA 7 RACE RELATIONS 26 HUMAN RELATIONS 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 14 TOTAL 74 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 7 6 3 3 19 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 1 15 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 1 ABACUS TRAINING 18 PARRNT INVOLVEME 1 TOTAL 20 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 6 2 14 0 0 4.35 26.09 8.70 60.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 12 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 23 00 23 % BLACK 00 33.33 00 00 00 00 25.00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1142","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Forest Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Forest Heights Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Franklin Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fulbright Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1142"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["234 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nForest Park Elementary, Forest Heights Elementary, Franklin Elementary, Fullbright Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nFOREST PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 1 9 0 19 0 0 3.45 31.03 00 65.52 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 29 00 29 % BLACK 100.00 35.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 34.48 34.48 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 33.33 CUSTODIANS 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 66.67 SUPERVISION AIDES 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 6 0 6 0 0 16 62.50 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 25.00 37.50 00 37.50 00 00 16 62.50 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 15 11.11 33.33 0 25 .00 55.56 0 .oo 0 .00 45 45 44.44 44.44 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 12 15 17 11 2 0 57 47.4% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 14 14 18 16 0 0 62 45.2% 02 14 18 23 17 0 1 73 43.8% 03 16 12 17 19 0 0 64 43.8% 04 11 18 16 19 0 1 65 44.6% 05 14 12 11 17 0 1 55 47.3% 06 15 19 11 10 1 0 56 60.7% Total 96 108 113 109 3 3 432 47.2% 22.2% 25.0% 26.2% 25.2% .7% .7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COLLINS c. 1 4 6 7 3 20 50.0% K MOORE C. 1 5 2 5 5 2 19 36.8% K SIGNAIGO c. 1 3 7 5 3 18 55.6% 01 WENGER C. 1 6 5 6 5 22 50.0% 01 WESTBROOK P. 1 3 4 5 6 18 38.9% 01 WHITE-ERWIN P. 1 5 5 7 5 22 45.5% 02 BAUMAN S. 1 5 7 8 5 25 48.0% 02 GWIN L. 1 4 7 8 6 25 44.0% 02 MACHEN J. 1 5 4 7 6 1 23 39.1% 03 GESTAUT H. 1 5 3 5 8 21 38 .1% 03 PENNY J. 1 5 5 6 5 21 47.6% 03 TURNER A. 1 6 4 6 6 22 45.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 CLEMENTS c. 1 5 4 4 7 20 45.0% 04 GIUSTI D. 1 3 8 5 7 23 47.8% 04 MARTIN M. 1 3 6 6 5 1 21 42.9% 04 WESTBROOK P. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TALLEY T. 1 7 5 7 7 1 27 44.4% 05 WILSON G. 1 7 7 4 10 28 50.0% 06 BALLARD J. 1 7 10 6 5 28 60.7% 06 LEMLE N. 1 8 9 5 5 1 28 60.7% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 3 2 3 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 5 4 2 3 0 0 14 64.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 12 20 43 50 0 2 127 25.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 1 1 2 BF WM WF 2 2 2 1 OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 5 80.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 8 8 11 1 33 39.4% 2 2 4 50.0% STU.COUN.OFFICER 1 1 2 3 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% JUST SAY NO 10 10 10 10 1 41 48.8% 2 1 3 66.7% PEER TUTORS 6 6 6 6 2 26 46.2% 1 1 100.0% MOTIVATORS 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 100.0% TOTAL 22 33 26 42 3 1 127 43.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 .0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 8 25.0% VIPS 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 5 10 20 35 42.9% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% TOTAL 6 16 28 50 44.0% 3 7 4 10 24 41. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 22 1 11 TESA 8 RACE RELATIONS 22 1 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 22 1 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 19 1 6 abacus 17 corr.ofeffec.sch 8 corp.lerng. 15 ann.sch.imp pln. 29 desegreg. 9 coe 26 27 9 at risk students 19 wind. on science 20 4 2 classroom mgt. 22 hands on math. 26 6 TOTAL 284 41 50 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 21 16 3 2 10 25 27 2 2 77 27 2 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 22 1 37 1 PAGE 1 FOREST HEIGHTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 5 9 4 13 0 0 31 45.16 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 1 0 3 0 0 5 40.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 3 1 2 0 0 6 50.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MUSIC 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100. 00 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 25.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 9 19 7 26 0 0 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 14.75 31.15 11.48 42.62 00 00 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 7 7 1 10 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 28.00 28.00 4.00 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 7 5 1 1 1 1 2 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 00 28.57 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 100.00 66.67 56.00 56.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 16 26 8 36 18.60 30.23 9.30 41.86 0 .oo 0 .oo 86 86 % BLACK 48.84 48.84 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 9 3 3 1 0 0 16 75.0% 07 77 69 32 34 3 7 222 65.8% 08 67 82 37 20 4 0 210 71.0% 09 83 75 28 26 3 1 216 73 .1% Total 236 229 100 81 10 8 664 70.0% 35.5% 34.5% 15.1% 12.2% 1.5% 1.2% LRSD 0- FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ALLEN F. 1 42 31 11 14 1 4 103 70.9% BAILEY R. 1 48 40 17 17 122 72 .1% BASS M. 1 32 38 21 18 1 3 113 61. 9% BEGGS M. 1 48 36 10 14 3 111 75. 7% BIRGE A. 1 44 34 10 14 2 104 75.0% BRADSHER P. 1 29 29 10 6 74 78.4% BRISCOE III J. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% BROWN A. 1 17 19 15 16 2 5 74 48.6% CARR P. 1 36 31 15 11 1 2 96 69.8% COBBS M. 1 30 15 5 2 1 53 84.9% COLE L. 1 35 41 17 11 1 1 106 71.7% CROMEDY v. 1 35 37 15 10 3 100 72.0% CROSS N. 1 29 34 20 19 1 3 106 59.4% DAVIS 8. 1 17 11 4 3 35 80.0% PETERSON K. 1 17 17 100.0% DUNCAN E. 1 51 32 11 12 3 1 110 75.5% LRSD 0-FOREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29~ School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNLAP D. 1 41 23 18 15 2 1 100 64.0% POSITION v. 1 9 1 10 90.0% FORE L. 1 28 36 16 12 1 93 68.8% GREEN II T. 1 49 57 36 18 1 161 65.8% HAMMAKER c. 1 42 32 11 14 1 4 104 71.2% HOLLOWAY G. 1 34 36 20 18 1 3 112 62.5% JOHNSON v. 1 32 49 9 15 105 77.1% JOHNSON T. 1 31 40 18 7 3 99 71. 7% JONES S. 1 40 44 17 12 1 1 115 73.0% KIDD L. 1 15 4 2 21 90.5% KIRCHNER L. 1 34 42 19 8 3 106 71. 7% BRUCE-LIPKINS E. 1 13 8 3 2 26 80.8% MAGEE M. 1 33 41 19 8 3 104 71.2% MAYS A. 1 36 42 19 7 3 107 72.9% MCCREE G. 1 37 30 11 14 1 4 97 69 .1% MCFADDEN S. 1 42 37 12 10 3 1 105 75.2% LRSD O. OREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MUELLER C. 1 11 18 6 4 39 74.4% NUNIS H. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% PIKE L. 1 31 37 21 18 1 3 111 61. 3% POOLE T. 1 35 40 18 12 1 106 70.8% POTURALSKI E. 1 12 5 1 18 66.7% PRICE L. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% ROBERTS c. 1 40 42 18 11 1 1 113 72.6% RUNDELL M. 1 16 18 10 7 2 53 64.2% SHERBETT K. 1 34 34 11 11 4 94 72. 3% SMITH JR v. 1 280 246 107 80 11 8 732 71. 9% POSITION v. 1 40 43 18 11 1 1 114 72.8% TAYLOR C. 1 23 19 5 3 1 51 82.4% THOMASON M. 1 27 16 8 8 1 60 71. 7% THOMAS M. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% TODD L. 1 19 30 17 16 1 1 84 58.3% WALKER Y. 1 27 40 18 7 3 95 70.5% LRSD 0-FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WILLIAMS K. 1 33 41 18 12 1 105 70.5% WILLIAMS G. 1 31 38 21 18 1 3 112 61. 6% WILLIAMS N. 1 25 10 10 5 5 55 63.6% ZAKRZEWSKI M. 1 43 36 10 14 1 4 108 73 .1% ZIMMERMAN D. 1 43 31 11 14 1 4 104 71. 2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Hearing Impaired 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.0% Mentally Retarded 10 8 2 1 0 0 21 85.7% Multihandicapped 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 19 7 5 0 1 0 32 81. 3% Speech or Language Impaired 12 6 6 4 0 0 28 64.3% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Visually Handicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 44 28 14 6 1 0 93 77.4% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 37 27 26 1 1 122 54.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 6 1 1 8 75.0% 08 2 1 2 5 60.0% 09 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 15 6 2 2 1 18 8 80.8% 08 15 4 2 1 17 5 86.4% 09 5 8 2 7 8 86.7% MATH 07 10 3 10 3 100.0% 08 15 9 1 1 16 10 92.3% 09 16 11 2 1 1 19 12 87 .1% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 21 8 1 1 1 23 9 90.6% 08 13 4 13 4 100.0% 09 15 6 2 1 1 18 7 84.0% SCIENCE 07 19 5 1 1 20 6 92.3% 08 7 2 1 1 8 3 81. 8% 09 26 19 4 1 1 31 20 88.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 35 58 40 38 2 2 175 53 .1% Math 30 34 36 30 4 2 136 47 .1% Science 28 51 41 32 2 1 155 51.0% Social Studies 32 35 28 49 3 1 148 45.3% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 125 178 145 149 11 6 614 49.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FBLA 4 13 3 6 26 65.4% 3 3 .0% FOOTBALL 26 9 35 74.3% 1 2 3 33.3% FRENCH CLUB 5 8 6 8 1 28 46.4% 1 1 .0% FUTURE HOME MK 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% GOLF .0% 1 1 .0% NAT. JR. HONOR 3 7 3 3 1 17 58.8% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILATORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPANISH CLUB 13 17 10 10 1 1 52 57.7% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL .0% 1 1 2 50.0% BASKETBALL ( B) .0% 1 1 2 100.0% BASKETBALL ( G) .0% 2 2 100.0% BETA CLUB 8 22 9 6 3 48 62.5% 2 2 .0% CARE CLUB .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHEERLEADERS 6 5 1 12 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black SOCCER .0% 1 1 100.0% TRACK ( B) 17 17 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TRACK ( G) 22 3 25 88.0% 2 2 100.0% VOLLEYBALL 20 9 1 30 66.7% 1 1 100.0% Y-TEENS 13 8 21 61. 9% 1 1 .0% CHOIR 19 37 5 12 73 76.7% 1 1 100.0% ADV. BAND 7 5 1 1 1 15 80.0% 1 1 100.0% INT. BAND 14 9 3 1 1 28 82 .1% 1 1 100.0% BEG. BAND 20 8 2 4 2 36 77.8% 1 1 100.0% FCLA 15 29 8 12 64 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% CHESS CLUB 4 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 .0% SAP 1 8 11 20 45.0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 156 245 63 102 9 4 579 69.3% 8 15 5 17 45 51. 1% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL-A 0 3 2 3 8 62.5% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 1 2 4 50.0% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 4 2 1 8 12.5% HONOR ROLL-B 09 4 18 5 13 2 42 52.4% HONOR ROLL-B 08 6 26 5 7 3 1 48 66.7% HONOR ROLL-B 07 8 16 17 4 1 46 52.2% TOTAL 22 64 33 29 4 4 156 55.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT PTA VIPS BM 1 BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 2 1 WF 2 1 1 OM 1 OF Total % 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 75.0% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ADMINSTATIVE COM 5 2 1 8 87.5% POTLUCK COMMITT 1 3 2 6 66.7% STEERING COMMIT. 1 3 1 5 10 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE ASSEMBLY COMMITT PUPIL SERVICES S.A.P. BM 1 2 BF 1 3 WM WF 4 2 OM OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 9 2 55.6% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black MENTORS COMMUNICATIONS RECRUITMENT 1 1 5 5 1 100.0% 5 . 0% 6 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TECHNOLOGY COMM. DISCIPLINE SUNSHINE COMM. 3 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 4 5 9 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black TOTAL 16 18 8 33 75 45.3% 2 4 4 10 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 32 TESA 32 45 RACE RELATIONS 29 1 1 HUMAN RELATIONS 32 2 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 25 2 1 EQTY MONITORING 7 SPECIAL ED MODIF 1 22 COE 55 58 MAGNET ARTS SCH 1 1 ATTENDANCE SEC 1 PARAPROF TRNG 1 MASTER SCDL-REG 1 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURTY 1 TOTAL 206 137 7 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 24 CYCLE 1 29 CYCLE 2 15 CYCLE 3 9 COOP. LEARNING 46 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 41 LEARNING STRAT. so MODIF. INSTRUCT. 6 3 3 STUDENTS AT RISK 4 58 TOTAL 174 108 3 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 43 3 CLASSROOM MGMT. 41 4 INTEG. ACAD. CLS 3 SECURITY INSERV AVOID\\FAIL. BEH. TOTAL 84 10 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 2 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURIT 2 2 MIDDLE SCHL LDSP 4 PEER HELP RETREA 2 CAREER ED. PLANG 1 SAP TRAINING 5 2 1 READING RENAISSA 2 ADD INS.-SPEC.ED 6 ANN REVW-SPEC.ED 4 COACHES MEETING 5 FAMILY MATH\u0026amp;SCI 4 GIFTED WORKSHOP 1 ALTERNATIVE EDUC 1 OASIS RENEWAL 6 COACHING CLINIC 2 CHECK IN TRAINNG 1 STANFORD 9 55 57 TITLE I CMPTR 2 FOOTBALL COACHES 3 HEALTH \u0026amp; PHYS ED 2 1 LRNG FNDTNS-DM TURNING POINTS 58 1 TEACHING TIPS 55 LIB. AUTOMATION 1 INFO. BYTE WORD TOTAL 76 206 4 FRANKLIN  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN POSITION B L A C K W H I T E OTHER TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 3 11 0 14 0 0 28 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 50.00 MUSIC 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ART 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 AUXILIARY TEACHER 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 3 18 0 21 0 0 42 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 7.14 42.86 00 50.00 00 00 42 50.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK NURSE SOCIAL WORKER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 18 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 6 31 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 15.38 79.49 2.56 2.56 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 4 1 1 1 23 2 39 00 39 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 95.65 100. 00 94.87 94.87 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 9 49 1 22 11.11 60.49 1.23 27.16 0 .oo 0 .00 81 81 % BLACK 71.60 71.60 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 32 39 2 1 1 0 75 94.7% P4 22 34 6 4 2 3 71 78.9% SP 11 4 2 1 0 0 18 83.3% 01 30 31 0 2 0 2 65 93.8% 02 30 27 1 2 1 0 61 93.4% 03 28 25 1 0 0 0 54 98 .1% 04 23 19 2 0 1 1 46 91. 3% 05 13 19 0 1 0 0 33 97.0% 06 12 24 0 0 0 2 38 94. 7% Total 201 222 14 11 5 8 461 91.8% 43.6% 48.2% 3.0% 2.4% 1.1% 1.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROOKS-TURNER K. 1 6 13 19 100.0% K BUTLER B. 1 8 9 2 19 89.5% K HOLLEY M. 1 9 9 1 19 94.7% K JACKSON s. 1 9 8 1 18 94.4% P4 BUCK J. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% P4 MCNULTY L. 1 4 10 3 1 18 77.8% P4 PARISH P. 1 4 11 1 1 1 18 83.3% P4 WINSTON J. 1 9 6 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 JENKINS T. 1 7 8 1 1 17 88.2% 01 MYRICK A. 1 6 8 1 15 93.3% 01 SIMPSON C. 1 10 7 17 100.0% 01 WATSON M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 ARNETT M. 1 4 8 1 13 92.3% 02 CAMPBELL S. 1 9 3 1 1 1 15 80.0% 02 JENKINS T. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 SNELLING N. 1 9 7 16 100.0% 02 WASHINGTON P. 1 8 8 16 100.0% 03 MULLINS T. 1 8 10 18 100.0% 03 STUBBLEFIELD G. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% 03 WIMBERLY J. 1 13 6 19 100.0% 04 ACOTT M. 1 6 7 1 14 92.9% 04 GADDY E. 1 8 7 1 1 17 88.2% 04 JORDAN D. 1 3 3 100.0% 04 KINARD L. 1 9 5 1 15 93.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 JACKSON JR J. 1 5 9 14 100.0% 05 JORDAN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% 05 MCMURRAY K. 1 8 10 1 19 94.7% 06 DILLARD C. 1 5 13 1 19 94.7% 06 GILES A. 1 7 11 1 19 94.7% 06 JORDAN D. 1 2 3 5 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Mentally Retarded 8 4 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100. 0% Specific Learning Disability 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 9 1 0 0 0 24 95.8% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 26 16 2 0 0 0 44 95.5% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 20 3 1 0 1 34 85.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 4 75.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 2 2 100.0% 06 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ACADEMIC GAMES BROWNIES CUB SCOUTS GIRLS SCOUTS MATH MANIPULATIV SEWING NEEDLEWOR SC !ENCE CLUB TOTAL .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE ADULT SPONSORS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A's 01 6 14 1 1 1 23 87.0% A's 02 4 7 11 100.0% A's 03 3 5 1 9 88.9% A's 04 1 1 100.0% A's 05 .0% A's 06 1 1 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 01 6 3 9 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 02 9 9 18 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 03 7 2 1 10 90.0% A\u0026amp;B 04 2 2 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 05 1 4 5 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 06 3 4 7 100.0% B's 01 1 1 100.0% B's 02 .0% B's 03 2 2 4 100.0% B's 05 1 1 100.0% B's 06 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Improve 01 4 4 100.0% Most Improve 02 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 03 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 04 2 2 100.0% Most Improve 05 1 1 100.0% Most Improve 06 1 1 100.0% Citizenship 01 5 8 1 1 15 86.7% Citizenship 02 9 17 26 100.0% Citizenship 03 9 11 1 1 22 90.9% Citizenship 04 3 3 100.0% Citizenship 05 1 3 2 6 66.7% Citizenship 06 3 6 9 100.0% TOTAL 75 111 5 2 2 2 197 94.4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 1 6 83.3% 1 2 1 4 75.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 2 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% READING COMMITTE 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % FIELD DAY COMMIT PARENT INVOLVEME SCIENCE FAIR 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 1 Black 4 100.0% 8 4 75.0% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 1 1 WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 1 100.0% 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black AUTHOR CONFERENC 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 100.0% SUNSHINE COMMITT 2 1 2 5 40.0% 1 1 100.0% PUBLIC AWARENESS 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BEHAVIOR MANAGEM SPIRIT COMMITTEE VIPS COMMITTEE 3 3 2 1 3 2 4 7 5 6 Black 42.9% 60.0% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 2 OM OF Total % Black .0% 2 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 3 35 3 24 65 58.5% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 20 1 1 24 91. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PARENT COUNC SOP 33 6 MULTIPLE INTELLI 33 22 TEACHING COMPUTE 36 6 GREAT EXPECTATIO 23 10 PHONIC READING 11 ABACUS 33 6 ACCELETR READER 7 SHURLEY METHOD 13 22 COE MATHPULATIVE 26 4 EXTD COMPRENSIVE 33 5 READING LA INSTR 2 THEMATIC UNIT 33 6 OPEN COURT 32 17 13 AETN 21 8 INCENTI SCH PLAN 27 READING STRAGEGI 19 TEAM BULIDING 45 PRINCIPAL INSTIT 1 SOC STUD TEXTBOO 19 READING PROGRAM 19 INTERNATI READIN 4 SUCCESS FOR ALL 45 4 SHURLEY METHOD 21 ACCELERATED READ 22 NEW CENTURY COMP 13 TOTAL 435 185 67 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ACCELERATE READ! TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 7 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CLASSROOM MGMT 33 INST AIDE MGMT 16 CLASSROOM DISCIP 27 10 AT RISK STUDENTS 33 15 TOTAL 60 33 25 16 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 POSTAL SERVICE 2 2 STRESS REDUCTION 29 9 HUMAN RELATIONS 27 12 EXTRAVANGANZA 5 PARENT WORKSHOP 3 2 AS400 2 1 PURCHASING 1 1 HIV \u0026amp; AIDS 1 3 GANG DYNAMICS 1 1 1 1 PROJECT SPIRIT 1 1 GREEN CIRCLE 1 1 CONFLICT 1 1 PARENT INVOLEMEN 31 6 OPEN COURT 34 11 TOTAL 95 52 27 18 FUIBRIGHT   POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 13 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 11 3 20 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 23 2 1 2 2 2 1 35 00 31.43 8.57 57.14 00 2.86 35 % BLACK 00 100.00 30.43 50.00 00 50.00 50.00 00 00 31.43 31.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 10 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 23.81 47.62 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 4 1 1 1 1 6 4 21 00 21 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 00 66.67 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT QUIZ:SSPLST B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 21 3 26 8.93 37.50 5.36 46.43 0 .oo 1 1.79 TOTAL 56 56 % BLACK 46.43 46.43 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 24 14 14 17 0 1 70 54.3% SP 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 25.0% 01 18 24 16 26 1 1 86 48.8% 02 22 7 10 26 1 0 66 43.9% 03 18 10 17 25 1 1 72 38.9% 04 17 19 18 17 0 0 71 50. 7% 05 24 14 9 16 2 0 65 58.5% 06 13 19 16 16 1 0 65 49.2% Total 137 107 103 143 6 3 499 48.9% 27.5% 21.4% 20.6% 28.7% 1.2% .6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COOPER D. 1 5 4 4 4 17 52.9% K FAUSETT L. 1 7 3 3 4 17 58.8% K HURD J. 1 6 5 2 5 18 61.1% K WYATT M. 1 6 2 5 4 1 18 44.4% 01 BUFFORD S, 1 2 2 .0% 01 JONES K. 1 4 7 4 6 1 22 50.0% 01 KAVANAUGH M. 1 4 6 5 7 22 45.5% 01 SIMPSON K. 1 5 5 4 7 21 47.6% 01 WESTLAKE B. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAY P. 1 8 4 4 7 23 52.2% 02 NASH E. 1 8 1 3 9 1 22 40.9% 02 PENN c. 1 6 2 3 10 21 38 .1% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 BUFFORD S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 DAVIS W. 1 5 6 4 8 1 24 45.8% 03 HARRIS s. 1 6 2 7 8 23 34.8% 03 WILSON J. 1 7 2 6 9 1 25 36.0% 04 ROBERTSON s. 1 5 7 6 7 25 48.0% 04 HONORE'-SMITH K. 1 6 7 6 4 23 56.5% 04 WATSON T. 1 6 5 6 6 23 47.8% 05 GADDIE o. 1 10 4 3 5 1 23 60.9% 05 GRINAGE K. 1 7 4 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 SMITH C. 1 1 1 100.0% 05 WILLIAMS I. 1 7 5 3 5 20 60.0% 06 FOOTE C. 1 2 7 6 7 22 40.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 ROBINSONS. SMITH C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 6 5 BF 6 6 WM 5 5 WF 5 4 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 22 21 54.5% 52.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 2 1 0 0 4 25.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 .0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 40.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 2 6 3 0 0 15 40.0% Visually Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 8 3 11 7 0 0 29 37.9% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 19 27 29 2 0 82 29.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 3 100.0% 01 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 2 50.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 4 7 8 10 29 37.9% 1 1 2 .0% Monitors 3 1 4 1 9 44.4% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 7 8 12 11 38 39.5% 2 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR V.I.P.S. 3 1 2 4 6 4 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 1 5 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 6 2 % Black 50.0% 16.7% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Recruitment 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 6 2 Black 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 1 Black 3 100.0% 1 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners 2 7 9 22.2% .0% TOTAL 9 2 18 29 31.0% 2 4 1 9 16 37.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 29 TESA 16 RACE RELATIONS 35 HUMAN RELATIONS 33 CULTURAL RELAT. Parent Cont. 35 TOTAL 113 35 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 9 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Multicult. Guide 26 AR Crusade 7 3 Math Task Ctr 4 Soc Stud Pilot 4 COOP. LEARNING 33 Int. Lang. Arts 34 TOTAL 66 45 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. Disc. Mgt. Pgd. Disc. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 27 33 23 6 83 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Integrating Curr Social Skills Tr TOTAL PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1173","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Cloverdale Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","David O. Dodd Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Dunbar Magnet Middle School (Little Rock, Ark.)","J. A. Fair High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fair Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1173"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["97 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nCloverdale Junior High, Dodd Elementary, Dunbar Magnet Junior High, Fair High, Fair Park Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCLOVERDALE JR.HIGH  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR REMDL/COMP READING RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 5 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 10 16 7 22 0 0 18.18 29.09 12.73 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 2 32 5 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 55 00 55 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 40.63 100.00 50.00 00 25.00 100.00 50.00 00 100.00 47.27 47.27 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 10 11 0 4 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 40.00 44.00 00 16.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 75.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 84.00 84.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 20 27 7 26 25.00 33.75 8.75 32.50 0 .00 0 .oo 80 80 % BLACK 58.75 58.75 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 97 69 12 1 5 6 190 87.4% 08 110 85 6 5 1 8 215 90.7% 09 101 91 4 8 7 7 218 88.1% Total 308 245 22 14 13 21 623 88.8% 49.4% 39.3% 3.5% 2.2% 2 .1% 3.4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l - CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ABLES F. 1 4 4 1 9 88.9% ALLEN c. 1 45 43 1 1 4 94 93.6% ANDRESS W. 1 53 42 4 4 1 4 108 88.0% BEEBE S. 1 51 40 2 4 1 4 102 89.2% BENNETT A. 1 53 34 7 1 3 2 100 87.0% BENSON J. 1 49 29 3 1 2 84 92.9% GATELY L. 1 55 27 2 1 4 89 92 .1% BOSTIC K. 1 51 42 2 1 3 99 93.9% BURNETTE D. 1 50 47 2 3 4 4 110 88.2% CHAMBERS A. 1 60 12 6 3 1 82 87.8% CRISWELL D. 1 14 5 2 21 90.5% CROSSNO III J. 1 24 31 4 2 1 62 88.7% CROWDER c. 1 1 1 2 100. 0% DAVIS M. 1 51 42 2 4 3 102 91. 2% DOSS G. 1 19 4 3 1 27 85.2% EARNEST A. 1 44 37 4 2 4 91 89.0% LRSD SECONDARY scHooL els ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l ce CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDDINGTON K. 1 53 46 3 1 1 4 108 91. 7% ENOCH L. 1 2 3 5 100.0% GULLETT-SHELN T. 1 46 26 6 3 2 83 86.7% HAMILTON O. 1 47 35 4 2 4 92 89 .1% HARPER G. 1 51 43 3 5 3 4 109 86.2% HARRIS A. 1 31 64 3 1 5 104 91.3% HARRIS s. 1 1 1 100.0% HEARN A. 1 46 37 3 4 4 94 88.3% HERVEY s. 1 1 6 7 100.0% HOOPER B. 1 52 41 1 3 2 5 104 89.4% HUNTS. 1 54 39 4 1 2 4 104 89.4% JEFFERS M. 1 44 48 1 3 4 3 103 89.3% JONES D. 1 51 55 2 4 5 2 119 89.1% JONES K. 1 so 36 7 1 3 2 99 86.9% JONES x. 1 45 49 3 5 4 4 110 85.5% KINSEY T. 1 32 23 1 2 58 94.8% LRSD - CLOVERDALE SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29 . Schoo1: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black KLAIS N. 1 30 26 2 1 1 4 64 87.5% LABATT T. 1 34 33 4 3 2 76 88.2% LAMB C. 1 71 49 3 3 5 4 135 88.9% LEINBACH s. 1 57 44 2 1 1 4 109 92.7% MCFADDEN c. 1 47 47 5 1 2 4 106 88.7% MEDLOCK J. 1 12 5 2 19 89.5% NESMITH E. 1 48 36 2 2 2 90 93.3% NORMAN C. 1 24 4 1 1 1 31 90.3% PATTERSON D. 1 1 1 100.0% PENNINGTON J. 1 48 42 1 3 4 3 101 89 .1% POORE' P. 1 50 42 5 1 2 4 104 88.5% RALEY B. 1 18 3 1 3 25 84.0% RHODES B. 1 44 55 2 2 4 6 113 87.6% RUSH L. 1 48 48 3 4 3 4 110 87.3% SCOTTS. 1 21 24 2 3 2 2  54 83.3% SHUMATE K. 1 45 47 8 1 1 4 106 86.8% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: e CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te~m: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SLOAN D. 1 49 26 7 2 1 6 91 82.4% STARLING L. 1 57 41 4 4 4 1 111 88.3% STEPHENS L. 1 54 40 8 1 1 5 109 86.2% TAYLOR T. 1 35 11 1 47 97.9% VAN PELTS. 1 16 18 1 2 7 7 51 66. 7% WICKLIFFE A. 1 35 23 1 1 1 61 95.1% WILLIAMS B. 1 61 45 6 3 1 1 117 90.6% YOUNG K. 1 38 38 2 4 4 86 88.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 4 0 0 0 0 10 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 31 9 4 0 1 1 46 87.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 7 3 0 0 0 19 84.2% TOTALS 48 23 7 1 1 1 81 87.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 34 36 3 3 0 1 77 90.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 9 1 2 12 83.3% 08 8 1 1 1 11 81.8% 09 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 10 9 2 2 14 9 82.6% 08 13 7 1 1 2 16 8 83.3% 09 27 9 3 1 1 30 11 87.8% MATH 07 12 7 1 2 14 8 86.4% 08 14 7 1 1 1 15 9 87.5% 09 38 15 3 1 2 41 18 89.8% HISTORY /SOC STUDIES 07 9 9 2 11 9 90.0% 08 26 7 1 1 1 28 8 91.7% 09 18 5 4 1 1 22 7 79.3% SCIENCE 07 22 6 1 1 1 24 7 90.3% 08 19 10 1 2 20 12 90.6% 09 25 9 3 1 1 28 11 87.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 .0% Math 1 1 2 4 50.0% Science 2 3 1 6 83.3% Social Studies 1 4 1 6 16.7% Foreign Language 1 1 2 .0% TOTAL 4 4 6 9 23 34.8% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 42 1 43 97.7% 2 1 3 66. 7% Drill Team 18 18 100. 0% 1 1 100.0% Pride Group 20 3 23 87.0% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 6 1 1 8 75.0% 1 1 .0% Choir 17 34 2 2 55 92.7% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 11 1 12 91. 7% 2 2 .0% Volleyball 17 17 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Monitors .0% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% Beta .0% 2 2 100.0% FBLA 21 36 4 1 3 65 87.7% 2 1 3 66.7% FHA 4 10 2 2 18 77.8% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 15 20 1 2 38 92.1% 1 1 .0% Poetry Club .0% .0% Peer-Facilitator 10 10 2 3 2 2 29 69.0% 1 2 3 100.0% Year Book 10 20 1 1 32 93.8% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Newspaper 10 6 16 100.0% 1 1 .0% Girls Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Boys Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Prin.Council 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% SECME 12 18 3 33 90.9% 1 1 2 50.0% NJHS 10 20 2 32 93.8% 1 2 3 .0% BAND 35 12 47 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Golf .0% .0% Soccer .0% .0% Track(Boys) .0% .0% Track(girls) .0% .0% Teach/Tomorrow .0% .0% TOTAL 207 240 11 23 3 8 492 90.9% 11 10 5 11 37 56.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A Honor Roll 7- 17 23 4 8 2 54 74.1% A/B Honor Ro 7- 58 93 11 16 4 7 189 79.9% C/F StofWk 7- .0% Cadet F/Fli 7 .0% Eagle F/Fli 7 .0% TOTAL 75 116 15 24 6 7 243 78.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Biracial Committ P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% 1 100.0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 4 1 WM WF OM 2 1 OF Total 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS .0% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 10 13 8 19 50 46.0% .0% Stud.Recruit.Com 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Windows .0% .0% TOTAL 10 15 8 20 53 47.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 13 TESA 4 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS 13 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 TOTAL 37 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 21 Behavior Mgmt 15 Coop Discipline 13 TOTAL 64 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Student Asst Prg 19 New Futures Ins. 16 Curriculum/L.A. 8 Curriculum/Math 5 Curr/SocialStud. 4 Curr. Science 7 Voe. Ed. Inserv 5 G/T Inserv. 11 Special Ed. Ins 5 Health Ins. 7 Prag Budg.Docum 1 Data Process Ins 2 TOTAL 90 PAGE 1 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 2 1 1 4 2 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 3 0 4 0 1 12 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 33.33 25.00 00 33.33 00 8.33 12 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 58.33 58.33 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 9 2 18 14.29 25.71 5.71 51.43 0 .oo 1 2.86 TOTAL 35 35 % BLACK 40.00 40.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 5 9 7 2 1 0 24 58.3% SP 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 70.0% 01 14 4 11 4 2 0 35 51.4% 02 14 16 4 5 0 1 40 75.0% 03 12 5 2 3 0 0 22 77.3% 04 10 11 4 7 1 1 34 61.8% 05 13 14 5 10 0 0 42 64.3% 06 6 7 2 4 0 0 19 68.4% Total 81 66 38 35 4 2 226 65.0% 35.8% 29.2% 16.8% 15.5% 1.8% .9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BLUE s. 1 4 4 3 1 1 13 61.5% K HARE v. 1 1 5 4 1 11 54.5% 01 MEEKS J. 1 6 3 6 2 1 18 50.0% 01 MITCHELL v. 1 8 1 5 2 1 17 52.9% 01 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 CHAMBERS S. 1 7 9 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 TAYLOR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RAINES A. 1 7 7 2 3 19 73. 7% 02 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 TAYLOR L. 1 12 5 2 3 22 77.3% 04 DILDAY J. 1 6 6 2 2 1 17 70.6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 FLEMING D. 1 4 5 2 5 1 17 52.9% 05 FRAWLEY E. 1 8 7 1 6 22 68.2% 05 GOLDMON Y. 1 5 7 4 4 20 60.0% 05 TAYLOR M. 1 3 3 100.0% 06 TAYLOR M. 1 2 2 .0% 06 RIDDLE B. 1 6 7 2 4 19 68.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded l 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 3 0 0 11 63.6% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 10 1 2 4 0 0 17 64. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 7 2 7 0 0 22 59 .1% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 2 50.0% 01 3 1 4 75.0% 04 1 1 2 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Beta Club .0% .0% Student Council .0% .0% Hall Monitors 5 4 1 4 1 15 60.0% .0% Fire Marshal ls 2 2 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Safety Patrol 3 2 1 6 50.0% 2 2 3 7 28.6% Basketball 15 3 18 83.3% 14 8 22 63.6% Cheerleaders 15 11 1 27 55.6% 15 7 22 68.2% Tiny Tumblers .0% .0% Peer Tutors 5 8 1 6 20 65.0% 8 9 1 2 20 85.0% Peer Helpers 4 6 3 2 15 66.7% .0% Conflict Manager .0% 3 2 2 4 11 45.5% Ambassadors 9 3 4 8 24 50.0% .0% Announcements 6 8 2 4 20 70.0% 14 11 9 2 36 69.4% Just Say No .0% .0% Flag Monitors 6 2 1 1 10 80.0% 5 1 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 55 48 18 39 1 2 163 63.2% 61 24 30 11 126 67.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's 1- 11 7 13 11 1 1 44 40.9% 3.0 1- 22 26 7 14 1 70 68.6% Citizenship K- 28 17 17 22 2 2 88 51.1% Perfect Att. K- 25 19 8 9 1 62 71.0% Acad. Hall K- .0% TOTAL 86 69 45 56 3 5 264 58.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 1 WM WF 1 2 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 4 1 Black 50.0% 25.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 50.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE P.S.T. Committee Sch. Impv. /COE Discipline Comm. BM 1 1 BF 1 2 WM WF 1 3 4 3 OM OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 3 4 3 OM 2 OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Hos pi tali ty 3 3 .0% 1 2 3 33.3% BCC Committee 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Recruitment 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 1 4 25.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Guidance Comm. TOTAL BM 1 3 BF 9 WM WF 2 4 25 OM OF Total % 5 39 Black 20.0% 30.8% BM 1 5 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 8 1 4 25 1 5 40 Black 20.0% 32.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: School Climate Human Relations TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET-Review K-6 12 21 Integrated Curr. 21 21 1 Autism Workshop 3 1 Math Workshop 21 3 1 TOTAL 54 48 1 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Individual Inst. 7 1 Reading Recovery 1 1 1 K-4 Training 5 2 Shurley Method 15 2 1 1 Multi.Intelligen 15 K-Spec.Needs 2 Reading/Economic 3 Early Literacy 6 1 Social Studies 14 Behavior Mgt. 18 18 6 6 TOTAL 53 55 8 10 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Partners in Educ 2 1 Open Ct. Phonics 21 20 1 TOTAL 23 21 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 9 8 6 15 0 1 39 43.59 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.67 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 13 15 11 21 0 1 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 21.31 24.59 18. 03 34.43 00 1. 64 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 12 0 5 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 22.73 54.55 00 22.73 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 100.00 83.33 100.00 00 00 00 00 100.00 100. 00 77.27 77.27 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M  F M F M F 18 27 11 26 21.69 32.53 13.25 31.33 0 .oo 1 1.20 TOTAL 83 83 % BLACK 54.22 54.22 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 78 86 49 41 9 9 272 60.3% 08 72 82 50 42 6 8 260 59.2% 09 70 59 49 52 8 7 245 52. 7% Total 220 227 148 135 23 24 777 57.5% 28.3% 29.2% 19.0% 17.4% 3.0% 3 .1% LRSD. oeDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Texm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADKINS c. 1 30 37 24 20 4 4 119 56.3% AXE. 1 25 35 27 23 4 3 117 51.3% JOHNSON K. 1 9 11 11 9 2 6 48 41. 7% BANKHEAD c. 1 39 54 21 14 3 4 135 68.9% BELL L. 1 22 31 25 14 3 3 98 54 .1% BLACKWELL w. 1 20 28 31 28 2 4 113 42.5% BROWN L. 1 37 17 8 8 5 75 72. 0% BROWN R. 1 55 53 18 15 4 4 149 72. 5% BURGESS R. 1 69 36 4 8 1 2 120 87.5% CARL D. 1 40 46 17 24 7 3 137 62.8% CARR D. 1 30 40 18 15 5 4 112 62.5% CARTER M. 1 23 25 18 20 5 2 93 51.6% POSITION v. 1 2 2 4 .0% CLAYBORN N. 1 41 46 26 22 2 4 141 61. 7% ROBINSON B. 1 47 49 12 4 1 4 117 82.1% DEAN O. 1 48 13 35 6 7 1 110 55.5% LRSD ce DUNBAR INT. L SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNN R. 1 9 9 1 1 2 1 23 78.3% FLYNN T. 1 29 40 22 8 3 3 105 65.7% FORNEROD. 1 17 24 16 11 1 4 73 56.2% GAINES s. 1 38 35 27 30 6 3 139 52.5% GARNER G. 1 28 30 18 20 3 2 101 57.4% HARTL. 1 33 28 29 25 2 117 52 .1% HENDERSON E. 1 32 25 33 30 4 5 129 44.2% HOEY M. 1 24 36 26 38 5 2 131 45.8% JACKSON G. 1 29 51 4 26 1 7 118 67.8% JONES F. 1 26 29 31 31 2 3 122 45 .1% JONES T. 1 49 50 15 8 2 3 127 78.0% LOGAN A. 1 40 27 34 37 4 4 146 45.9% MCDONALD T. 1 2 2 4 3 1 12 33.3% MCLEROY C. 1 45 37 8 3 3 5 101 81. 2% DAVIS B. 1 24 4 3 31 90.3% MUNDY s. 1 44 24 11 3 4 6 92 73.9% LRSD . ceDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MURRAY L. 1 7 18 44 39 5 5 118 21.2% NEWTON K. 1 32 38 13 12 3 3 101 69.3% OLDS A. 1 28 27 22 12 3 3 95 57.9% OSHIRO N. 1 39 47 28 20 2 136 63.2% PEACE P. 1 21 31 16 23 2 93 55.9% RICHARDSON w. 1 29 32 36 36 5 5 143 42. 7% RODGERS c. 1 55 43 19 10 5 1 133 73. 7% SANDERS s. 1 35 38 20 14 2 6 115 63.5% SHAVERS G. 1 31 9 3 43 93.0% SIMPSON R. 1 43 39 10 5 3 5 105 78 .1% SKOTKO F. 1 18 30 24 20 6 3 101 47.5% SLAYDEN M. 1 7 11 17 15 3 1 54 33.3% SMITH M. 1 33 35 7 3 3 2 83 81.9% SMITH s. 1 31 37 30 25 4 2 129 52. 7% STANLEY R. 1 11 20 21 21 4 4 81 38.3% TERRY P. 1 17 29 32 46 3 2 129 35. 7% LRSD ~DUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black UNDERWOOD J. 1 4 4 6 6 20 40.0% WARREN J. 1 24 24 31 29 8 4 120 40.0% WATSON c. 1 27 27 27 25 3 7 116 46.6% WATSON c. 1 28 25 18 25 3 4 103 51.5% WEBB B. 1 27 39 10 21 3 6 106 62.3% WESTERN J. 1 2 8 4 6 20 50.0% WISES. 1 25 31 33 40 3 2 134 41.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 4 1 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 20 6 5 1 0 0 32 81.3% Speech or Language Impaired 8 1 1 0 0 1 11 81.8% TOTALS 33 8 6 1 0 1 49 83. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 44 62 79 89 8 7 289 36.7% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 4 1 5 100. 0% 08 3 1 4 100.0% 09 4 1 1 1 7 71.4% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 13 3 1 14 3 94.1% 08 6 1 4 10 l 63.6% 09 11 10 3 2 14 12 80.8% MATH 07 5 l 1 6 1 85.7% 08 23 6 9 2 1 33 8 70.7% 09 18 5 2 3 1 21 8 79.3% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 7 5 2 9 5 85.7% 08 21 5 5 3 1 27 8 74.3% 09 14 6 1 1 15 7 90.9% SCIENCE 07 13 3 2 1 16 3 84.2% 08 9 2 2 1 12 2 78.6% 09 12 6 1 2 13 8 85.7% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 1 2 4 50.0% Math 1 2 3 .0% Science 1 1 1 3 66.7% Social Studies 1 3 4 25.0% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 3 2 1 8 14 35. 7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ESL CLUB 11 14 25 .0% 1 1 .0% CHEERLEADER 4 9 13 30.8% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% PEER MEDIATION 6 12 4 11 1 1 35 51. 4% 2 2 .0% VOLLEYBALL 18 9 27 66.7% 1 1 2 .0% LOVE 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 16 26 6 16 64 65.6% 1 1 2 50.0% FUTURE BOBCATS 5 5 5 5 20 50.0% 1 1 .0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 5 4 7 1 18 33.3% 1 1 .0% BETA CLUB 11 19 29 42 2 4 107 28.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 5 14 7 7 33 57.6% 1 1 .0% SPANISH CLUB 4 1 9 14 28.6% 1 1 .0% FOOTBALL 49 7 56 87.5% 3 3 100.0% GIRLS BASKETBALL 24 6 30 80.0% 1 1 2 100.0% GOLF TEAM .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black LATIN CLUB 2 3 10 6 1 2 24 20.8% 1 1 .0% GIRL'S TRACK .0% .0% BOY'S TRACK .0% .0% SOCCER .0% .0% TENNIS .0% .0% FHA 12 22 1 5 40 85.0% 1 1 100.0% ART CLUB 2 10 17 1 2 32 6.3% 1 1 .0% FRENCH CLUB 5 16 7 12 1 41 51.2% 1 1 .0% PROBLEM SOLVING 1 3 6 2 12 8.3% 1 1 .0% NEWSPAPER 4 4 5 6 1 20 40.0% 1 1 .0% RADIO CLUB 1 1 12 5 1 20 10.0% 1 1 2 50.0% YOUNG DEMOCRAT 2 8 20 1 31 6.5% 1 1 .0% ODYSSEY OF MIND 1 6 10 2 19 5.3% 3 3 .0% MOCK TRIAL 1 2 5 8 12.5% 1 1 .0% MATHLETES 1 8 6 2 3 20 5.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 5 14 5 10 1 35 54.3% 2 2 .0% BOYS BASKETBALL 12 2 1 15 80.0% 2 2 100.0% PRIN CABINET .0% 1 1 .0% OUTDOOR ED 8 5 7 3 1 2 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Y-TEENS 17 35 1 53 32 .1% 2 2 .0% FCA 11 10 3 1 1 26 80.8% 1 1 2 50.0% MEN OF DUNBAR 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 176 250 149 276 28 33 912 46.7% 9 6 7 25 47 31. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH HONOR/AWARD HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP REGION CHOIR TOTAL GRADE BM 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 9 BF WM WF OM 10/29/97 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE LIBRARY ADVISARY P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 2 2 WM WF 1 1 6 OM OF Total % 11 3 Black 36.4% 66.7% .0% BM 1 11 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 5 2 18 WM WF 1 4 4 4 37 OM 1 OF Total % 1 11 7 70 Black 45.5% 42.9% 41. 4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % TECHNOLOGY COMM SCHOOL IMPROV CO GT COMMITTEE 3 2 2 1 4 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 10 9 7 Black 40.0% 66.7% 42. 9% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 2 OF Total % Black 1 100.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total SCH RECRUITMENT PUPIL SERVICE MAGNET ADVISORY 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 5 12 5 % Black 40.0% 41. 7% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total 2 2 1 5 % Black 40.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 12 16 12 22 62 % Black 45.2% BM 12 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 28 7 46 4 OF Total 1 94 % Black 42.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 18 2 TESA 29 RACE RELATIONS 11 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 8 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 10 7 EDUC. EQUITY 112 6 TOTAL 188 22 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULT. DIVERSITY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 20 14 6 29 1 94 1 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. DOC. OF DISCIP. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: SEC SC I/MATH G/T WORKSHOP SECME LEARNING STYLES VIOLENCE PROVEN SAP FOR LANG ADVSRY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 10 3 44 26 5 3 86 5 PAGE 1  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 8 5 15 1 2 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 7 18 9 26 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 3 34 8 3 1 1 6 1 2 2 1 63 ll.ll 28.57 14.29 41.27 1.59 3.17 63 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 32.35 62.50 66.67 00 00 16.67 00 50.00 100.00 100.00 39.68 39.68 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 11 12 0 8 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 35.48 38.71 00 25.81 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 7 1 1 3 1 3 6 31 00 31 % BLACK 100.00 62.50 100.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 74.19 74.19 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 18 30 9 34 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.15 31.91 9.57 36.17 1.06 2 .13 94 94 % BLACK 51.06 51.06 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% SP 13 6 4 4 0 0 27 70.4% 10 139 93 29 24 0 2 287 80.8% 11 86 99 13 22 4 0 224 82.6% 12 81 102 16 25 1 1 226 81.0% Total 319 300 62 75 5 3 764 81.0% 41.8% 39.3% 8.1% 9.8% .7% .4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL el s ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: '4t FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black PHILLIPS M. 1 2 2 100.0% ANDERSON s. 1 53 35 8 11 1 1 109 80.7% ARMSTRONG J. 1 44 20 6 3 73 87.7% BEYAH R. 1 25 28 5 7 1 66 80.3% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% BOSTIC M. 1 22 37 4 8 3 74 79.7% BOURLAND M. 1 55 46 7 8 1 1 118 85.6% BRAGG A. 1 42 34 9 5 1 2 93 81. 7% BROADNAX w. 1 19 8 27 100. 0% CALLAWAY E. 1 46 48 2 6 1 103 91. 3% POSITION V. 1 3 3 100.0% CLEVELAND K. 1 60 33 11 5 1 110 84.5% BRAGG A. 1 45 38 5 6 1 95 87.4% COOKUS J. 1 43 41 6 7 2 99 84.8% PHILLIPS C. 1 13 7 3 4 27 74.1% DELAMAR C. 1 1 1 1 3 66.7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: lee FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNKLIN S. 1 48 25 9 12 94 77. 7% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% EARLEYWINE S. 1 33 37 6 11 3 90 77.8% ENDERLIN E. 1 36 25 7 4 1 73 83.6% ESKOLA G. 1 38 41 6 8 93 84.9% FELDMAN N. 1 46 58 7 8 119 87.4% GLASSCO B. 1 22 3 2 2 29 86.2% GRAY V. 1 31 32 7 6 1 77 81.8% GRUMMER w. 1 20 55 7 26 4 112 67.0% HALL L. 1 54 55 6 9 1 125 87.2% HARRIS L. 1 48 22 9 3 1 83 84.3% HARTNESS P. 1 20 10 5 35 85.7% HASTINGS M. 1 52 38 6 9 1 106 84.9% HEAVIN C. 1 20 37 1 10 68 83.8% POSITION v. 1 3 2 5 100.0% HOBBS P. 1 14 27 11 21 73 56.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HULLUM B. 1 49 33 6 6 1 95 86.3% JACKSONS. 1 41 36 6 9 92 83. 7% JACOBS A. 1 57 51 8 10 126 85. 7% JAMELL s. 1 11 7 4 4 26 69.2% JAMES M. 1 31 37 4 8 1 81 84.0% JENNINGS c. 1 17 32 8 15 72 68.1% JOHNSON J. 1 32 22 10 8 1 73 74.0% HARRISON T. 1 36 31 7 5 79 84.8% MACON s. 1 29 80 7 9 125 87.2% MAGEE B. 1 43 44 12 15 1 115 75.7% MAYS S. 1 41 44 4 2 91 93.4% MCAFEE R. 1 29 46 7 13 2 97 77.3% POSITION V. 1 3 5 8 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 100.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 .0% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION V. 1 12 3 15 80.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 .0% POSITION v. 1 9 9 100.0% POSITION V. 1 6 3 9 66. 7% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% MOREY D. 1 8 4 3 4 19 63.2% NAHLEN M. 1 27 29 4 10 70 80.0% PALMER R. 1 46 53 11 8 2 1 121 81.8% PICKERING J. 1 24 46 10 17 97 72.2% RAINS M. 1 42 35 10 7 1 95 81.1% RUTHERFORD P. 1 61 39 14 5 119 84.0% WALKER-RI CHAR L. 1 55 49 9 10 1 124 83.9% SCHMITT K. 1 36 32 9 15 92 73.9% POSITION V. 1 10 10 100.0% LRSD e FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION v. 1 7 22 4 9 42 69.0% STEELE M. 1 5 5 15 5 30 33.3% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% TAYLOR T. 1 21 20 1 1 43 95.3% THOMPSON P. 1 29 33 6 7 75 82.7% WAGE M. 1 54 54 8 10 1 1 128 84.4% WALKER s. 1 15 5 10 30 66.7% WILDER R. 1 30 37 10 11 4 92 72. 8% WILLIAMS M. 1 45 43 5 6 99 88.9% WILLIS L. 1 40 21 7 8 1 2 79 77.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 7 7 1 2 0 0 17 82.4% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 33.3% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Other Health Impaired 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 21 6 6 3 0 0 36 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 5 3 3 0 0 25 76.0% Visually Handicapped 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 47 21 15 11 0 0 94 72.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 65 14 13 1 0 123 77. 2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF 10 11 12 8 8 2 2 1 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total Count Black 13 76.9% 10 100.0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: FAIR HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 66 71 31 26 1 3 198 69.2% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 34 21 4 2 38 23 90.2% 11 12 5 4 1 1 17 6 73.9% 12 7 3 7 3 100.0% MATH 10 34 23 4 3 38 26 89 .1% 11 30 29 4 4 1 35 33 86.8% 12 15 10 1 15 11 96.2% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 28 11 3 2 31 13 88.6% 11 21 9 1 2 22 11 90.9% 12 3 1 1 4 1 80.0% SCIENCE 10 13 7 3 2 16 9 80.0% 11 9 5 2 9 7 87.5% 12 4 3 1 4 4 87.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL: STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM English 3 Math 2 Science 1 3 Social Studies 1 1 Foreign Language 1 TOTAL 2 2 8 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OF Total % Black 3 .0% 2 .0% 4 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 .0% 12 16.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Band 20 18 1 39 97.4% 1 1 100. 0% Baseball 5 21 26 19.2% 1 1 .0% Basketball, Boys 47 1 48 97.9% 2 2 100.0% Basketball, Girl 15 5 20 75 .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CCE 13 13 1 27 96.3% 1 1 100.0% Cheerleaders 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 100.0% Choir 8 37 1 7 53 84.9% 1 1 .0% Beta Club 4 22 3 11 40 65.0% 2 2 .0% Career Awareness 10 26 2 6 44 81.8% 2 2 .0% DECA 9 26 2 3 40 87.5% 1 1 100. 0% Drama Club 10 18 4 8 40 70.0% 1 1 100.0% Drill Team 20 20 100.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 37 51 3 8 3 1 103 85.4% 1 2 1 4 25.0% French Club 5 8 3 3 19 68.4% 1 1 .0% Football 50 2 52 96.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 100.0% Golf 2 4 6 .0% 1 1 .0% WOW Sr \u0026amp; Parents 25 37 8 10 1 81 76.5% 1 1 100.0% Journalism 2 4 7 10 23 26.1% 1 1 .0% Ring Staff-Jr 4 13 3 4 1 25 68.0% 1 1 .0% Ladies' Club 35 5 40 87.5% 3 3 100.0% Mu Alpha Theta 3 8 4 2 17 64.7% 1 1 .0% National Honor 10 19 7 9 1 46 63.0% 2 2 .0% Peer Counseling 9 22 5 9 45 68.9% 1 1 100.0% S.E.C.M.E. 17 22 1 5 45 86. 7% 1 1 100.0% Safety Council 6 5 2 2 15 73.3% 1 1 100.0% SAP 49 41 10 13 113 79.6% 1 1 .0% Spanish Club 7 24 2 17 2 1 53 58.5% 2 2 .0% Student Council 6 15 1 4 26 80.8% 1 1 .0% Teach. Tomorrow 13 1 14 92. 9% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Teens For Christ 1 3 36 40 2.5% 1 1 .0% Tennis 1 1 3 3 1 9 22.2% 1 1 .0% Track, Boys 24 24 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Track, Girls 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Volleyball 13 2 15 86. 7% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 .0% Fell. Chr. Ath. 18 1 1 20 90.0% 1 1 .0% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% 1 1 100.0% COE 2 12 1 6 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% Art Club 5 4 5 3 17 52.9% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 432 574 115 217 8 5 1351 74.5% 12 13 14 17 56 44.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Business Advisor 1 2 1 4 25.0% 1 2 3 3 9 33.3% CCE Advisory 1 1 100.0% 7 2 4 13 69.2% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Clear Sch Purpos 1 5 2 5 13 46.2% Discipline 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% Parent/Comm 1 2 2 5 10 30.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM Student Ach Time on Task Marketing BF 2 3 4 1 WM 1 2 WF 4 5 OM OF Total % 10 11 Black 50.0% 36.4% 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 1 1 4 OF Total % 3 Black .0% .0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 6 22 13 29 OM OF Total % Black 70 40.0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 8 9 8 34 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 12 2 TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS 8 5 HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 10 17 TOTAL 43 24 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 11 9 25 1 69 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 22 26 48 15 15 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Learn Strategies Viol Prevention GT Learn Styles TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 2 3 1 25 31 36 1 37 PAGE 1 FAIR PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 2 7 1 10 0 0 10.00 35.00 5.00 50.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 38.46 00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 45.00 45.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 7 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.75 43.75 00 37.50 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 3 16 00 16 % BLACK 66.67 100.00 100.00 00 00 60.00 66.67 62.50 62.50 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 14 1 16 13.89 38.89 2.78 44.44 0 .oo 0 .oo 36 36 % BLACK 52.78 52.78 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 17 3 3 0 0 38 84.2% P4 5 12 4 12 0 3 36 47.2% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 11 24 4 5 1 0 45 77.8% 02 13 12 2 1 2 1 31 80.6% 03 18 11 4 1 0 0 34 85.3% 04 7 8 3 1 0 0 19 78.9% 05 8 9 2 4 0 0 23 73.9% 06 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% Total 84 107 23 29 5 5 253 75.5% 33.2% 42.3% 9.1% 11.5% 2.0% 2.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POWELL R. 1 1 1 .0% K BROWN R. 1 7 9 1 2 19 84.2% K LEWIS L. 1 7 8 2 1 18 83.3% P4 COTHRAN D. 1 2 6 2 6 2 18 44.4% P4 PUSCH L. 1 3 6 2 6 1 18 50.0% 01 DELOZIER M. 1 6 12 2 1 1 22 81. 8% 01 POWELL R. 1 5 12 2 3 22 77.3% 02 CORBIN B. 1 5 3 1 9 88.9% 02 JAMES C. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RICE O. 1 7 9 2 1 2 21 76.2% 03 CORBIN B. 1 5 4 9 100.0% 03 TURNER M. 1 13 7 4 1 25 80.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 04 05 06 JAMES C. SHERWOOD S. CARTER C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 7 8 3 1 19 78.9% 8 9 2 3 22 77.3% 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 1 2 1 0 1 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 6 2 2 0 2 0 12 66.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 9 4 4 0 0 23 65.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 03 3 BF 2 1 WM WF OM OF Total % 1 Count Black 3 100.0% 2 100.0% 1 . 0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 2 50.0% Fire Marshal ls .0% .0% Student Council .0% 1 1 100.0% Peer Helpers .0% .0% Preschool Helper .0% .0% BASKETBALL 13 2 1 16 81.3% 2 2 100.0% CHEERLEADERS 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100. 0% AMBASSADORS 7 7 3 4 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% RECORDER GROUP 13 13 2 2 1 31 83.9% 1 1 100.0% CAMBIATA SINGERS 4 14 3 4 25 72 .0% .0% TOTAL 47 34 10 12 3 106 76.4% 3 3 2 8 75.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF \"A\"HONOR ROL \"B\"HONOR ROL \"AB\" HONOR CITIZENSHIP STU OF MONTH 4 5 3 TOTAL 4 5 3 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% 1 13 69.2% 1 13 69.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM 1 1 BF 1 WM WF 2 2 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black 33.3% 50.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 4 7 Black 50.0% 42.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Teacher Morale BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Student Handbook Science Fair Field Day BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Halloween Carniv Intl. Bazaar Grant Writing BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Com. PIE BCC BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .oi 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Discipline Student Council Journalism Newsp BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 6 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Pupil Serv. Team Guidance TOTAL BM BF 2 WM WF OM 1 4 OF Total 7 % Black .0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 1 4 2 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black .0% .0% 45.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP. CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Whole Language Multi Curriculum Computer Windows On Scien Reading RECOVERY K-4 CRUSADE TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1 6 7 PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_238","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Little Rock School District","North Little Rock School District","Pulaski County Special School District","School attendance"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/238"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["29 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nt' (.'Ii,,,,. ~/1-' '{ I  .J\n1/ - - -- - - October 1 State Department Enrollment Report - LRS -- - - - All Enrolled Students: 02-0ci-97 --- - ----- ----------- ---- 001 CENTRAL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total ~:, 13 10 10~8' B. 18 132 213 244 4 2 2 0 0 716 I w 11 1~-'I\n:) 26 147 168 201 2 0 4 4 1 0 653 ~ 12 _\nl.\u0026lt;} 0 97 104 104 138 0 I 3 4 0 452 r'I J., KF 18' I 1,\u0026gt;134~ 20 13 ~t 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALFOR:CENTRAL 97 384 505 596/lt 6 3 9 9 1 1J 002 HALL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total \"I 3 10 ,s=r/ d 24 33 104 99 4 l 4 7 0 0 276 0 w II /'l! 1 w 21 31 92 89 4 2 5 3 0 I 248 - 12 .\u0026gt;./a C 31 42 85 76 3 1 6 2 0 0 246 1 KF 7'8'-',I 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 /'!O (1 s 4 6 3 ~o 0 0 0 0 0 14 TOT AL FOR: HALL 71 (O ,i180 107 289 272~ 1 4 15 12 0 1 \u0026gt;13,gfi 1 1i ~ L._..../ 003 MANNM/S Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 77 60 75 76 0 I 2 0 0 292 08 57 75 69 81 2 0 1 0 287 09 8 75 59 86 0 4 2 4 0 1 279 ~~i-- TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS iq 182 210 203 2434\u0026gt;llr2 5 4 7 0 2?p 858 PARKVIEW Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 51 87 70 84 3 4 I 0 302 11 68 75 83 80 2 1 3 0 0 313 12 54 83 51 96 v\\3 5 3 I 0 0 296 B,.,~ TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW \u0026gt;\\\\\u0026lt;$173 245 204 260 ~ 8 7 5 8 1 o~'I 911 BOOKER Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 13 16 20 28 0 0 0 0 0 78 02 4 18 22 13 24 I 0 2 0 0 0 80 03 6 20 19 22 23 0 0 0 0 86 04 3 19 22 21 22 0 0 0 0 86 05 3 22 24 28 21 0 1 I 0 0 98 06 4 17 26 29 19 I 0 0 0 0 93 KF 4 18 19 17 21 0 0 0 0 0 76 ~?7 ft\n121 148 150 158pfi 3 4 6 0 0 ,~ 597 DUNBAR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total Information Sen-ices Department - All Enrolled Students: 02-Oct-97 - ---- 07 52 42 77 86 4 5 2 3 0 0 271 08 51 45 71 82 3 4 2 2 0 0 260 09 48 53 69 57~ 4 3 2 0 240 /17 TOTALFOR:DUNBAR ~'I I 151 140 217 225 10 13 7 7 o,~ 008 FAIR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 29 23 131 94 0 I 0 0 0 0 278 II 14 23 84 100 3 0 0 0 0 225 12 16 25 83 102 I 0 0 0 0 228 s 4 4 II 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ~17 TOT AL FOR: FAIR ,ii 63 75 309 303(tl~4 1 1 0 0 '/ 757 009 FORST HT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 34 34 77 68 I 3 0 2 0 I 220 08 36 20 66 76 3 0 1 0 0 0 202 09 27 26 81 74 2 0 0 0 212 s 3 I 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 TOT AL FOR: FORST HT f~' 100 81 231 221\u0026gt;1~5 4 3 2 0 1 ,6 648 10 OIO PULHTJ Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 56 47 84 65 1 2 2 0 0 258 08 53 52 78 66 0 2 0 0 253 09 50 53 66 75 I 1 1 0 0 0 247 s 4 2 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 :f11 TOT AL FOR: PUL HT J i\"' 163 154 230 201Ai'12 3 4 4 0 0 1i 767 011 SOUTHWST Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 12 8 68 74 2 3 0 0 0 0 167 08 23 11 82 58 0 4 0 0 0 179 09 6 6 65 65 2 3 0 I 0 0 148 s I 13 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 ,g~t' TOTA L FOR: SOUTHWST c,c4i2 26 228 198 #i( 4 10. 0 2 0 0 ,~ 510 012 MCCLELLA Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 26 23 147 152 1 0 0 0 351 11 21 22 128 125 0 3 1 0 0 0 300 12 18 19 103 109 3 1 2 0 0 0 255 s 1 2 17 9 t\u0026gt; 0 0 0 0 0 ~\u0026gt;17TOTALFOR:MCCLELLA ,~'7ti6 66 395 395 \"\" 4 5 4 0 0 013 HENDERSN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total LR.soIn formation Services Department 2 Enrolled Students: 02-Oct-97 07 14 13 102 95 I 0 2 I 0 229 08 14 10 103 96 0 I I 2 0 0 227 09 22 13 104 103 I 0 0 2 0 0 245 s ii 2 0 17 4 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 23 \"lll., 52 36 326 298 t,'tl-2 3 5 o,re CLOVRJR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 13 2 99 68 3 3 0 1 0 0 189 08 8 10 109 87 4 0 0 0 0 219 09 6 13 99 90\n_ 2 0 0 0 214 ~ci7, TOT AL FOR: CLOVR JR f'27 25 307 245~j 7 9 1 1 0 0 ,i 622 MABELJR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 21 20 64 68 0 0 0 0 0 174 08 17 13 64 63 0 0 0 0 2 0 159 09 24 20 55 57 0 0 0 0 0 157 1~1 s 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . TOTA L FOR: MJ\\BEL JR (i'\n65 57 184 195 ~{\\ 0 1 0 0 2 1 \u0026gt;Ic s\n?~k 017 BALE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 6 2 14 24 2 I 0 0 0 0 49 02 2 5 4 18 18 0 0 1 0 0 47 03 2 4 3 15 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 40 04 2 4 5 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 05 2 8 10 20 13 0 0 0 0 53 06 2 2 20  14 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 E 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 KF 5 5 5 19 18 0 3 0 0 0 51 PK _9 1\u0026gt; 3 7 11 10 2 0 0 \" 0 \"-9/3. 5 fi1 TOT AL FOR: BALE \" 44 34 133 132,?li 4 5 9 1 0 0 1C\\ 362 018 BRADY Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 8 25 20 2 0 0 0 62 02 3 11 11 21 15 0 3 0 0 63 03 2 9 2 20 15 0 2 1 0 0 50 04 3 3 4 16 9 0 3 6 4 0 0 45 05 2 5 8 18 8 0 0 43 06 6 5 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 27 E 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 KF 3 5 9 19 20 0 2 0 0 0 56 LRSD Information Services Department 3 - Enrolled ~tude_~ts: 02-Oct-97 ---- PK 5 4 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 (\u0026gt; 0 \"\" 18 ~1 TOTALFOR:BRADY qi 50 48 134 101 ,.P 5 II 14 9 0 0 i' 372 -- -- - - --- - ----- BADGETT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 I I 18 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 2 0 2 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 03 1 0 1 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04 2 3 3 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 05 0 I 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06 0 0 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 E 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 KF 2 4 15 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 PK 0 :, 2 11 ~'f 18 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 1) o '!J/7,-31 cp- 1 TOTALFOR:BADGETT '' 8 11 110 1041 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 MCDERMOT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 5 24 13 19 14 2 0 0 0 74 02 3 13 11 22 22 0 1 0 0 71 03 2 12 19 28 13 0 0 0 0 0 73 04 2 20 10 19 18 0 2 0 0 71 05 3 13 10 23 21 0 0 0 0 1 69 06 3 10 7 19 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 65 KF 3 l( 14 10 13 15 ?\u0026gt;I 0 0 0 0 54 aJ7 TOTALFOR:MCDERMOT ~ 106 80 143 130,\" 5 3 5 4 0 1 ,i 477 021 CARVER Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 19 12 21 16 0 0 0 0 0 69 02 4 26 16 22 23 0 0 2 0 0 90 03 3 20 18 29 19 0 0 1 0 0 88 04 3 26 12 32 20 0 0 4 0 0 95 05 4 26 21 31 19 0 1 0 0 100 06 4 20 22 24 26 0 0 1 0 0 94 KF 3 A 16 10 9 21 :,,,0 0 2 2 0 0 60 ,~1- 0 TOT AL FOR: CARVER ~l, 153 111 168 144J' o 3 6 11 0 0 ~ 596 022 BASELINE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 4 4 24 19 0 0 0 54 02 2 1 2 15 16 0 0 0 0 0 35 03 2 0 5 17 23 0 0 0 48 04 3 2 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 LRSDI nformationS ervicesD epartment 4 :AlEl nrolled Stud\nrrts: - ~-- '...----- TOT AL FOR: BASELINE OS 06 E KF PK 2 2 4 4 0 I 2 0 2 S ) 2: 'i3 2! 17 11 0 IS 12 I 2 4 0 17 28 0 11\n\u0026gt;..116 ~ 0 132 135~~ 3 I 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 02-Qcl-97 0 I 35 0 0 29 0 0 8 0 0 54 0 O O 777- 35 2 1Y323 023 FAIR PRK Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 01 02 03 04 OS 06 KF PK 2 2 2 S 4 2 4 I 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 1 13 ,?~ 25 29 11 24 0 13 12 I 18 11 0 7 8 0 7 9 0 7 14 0 14 16 0 S ,1 12 0 82 106 {~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 44 0 30 0 34 0 20 0 21 0 27 0 36 0 .i/1.'/3. 6 0 ~ 248 024 FORST PK Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: FORST PK 01 02 03 04 OS 06 KF 3 18 16 IS 13 0 3 22 3 17 3 16 2 11 2 12 3 16 if'\\ 112 17 19 19 IS 9 12 107 14 17 0 16 13 0 12 20 0 13 12 0 14 19 0 12 IS ~ 0 96 109 '\n/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 2 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 71 65 68 52 55 4~1 0 57 0 C., 430 025 FRANKLIN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: FRANKLIN 01 02 03 04 OS 06 E KF J\u0026gt;K ~ LRSD Information Services Department 3 4 3 4 2 2 4 0 2 1 2 4 30 31 2 30 27 0 30 24 23 19 0 0 0 0 1 14 18 0 0 0 11 24 0 2 I I 4 0 2 33 40 I 8 1\n. 4 24 ~, 34 (\\ 0 ?J' 17 14 206 221  2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 61 55 46 33 37 18 0 0 77 q\n/7 o~ofn 0 0 (, 464 5 W)Enrolled Stude~ts: --- 02-Oct-97 ----- - ---- -- --- 026 GARLAND Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 15 17 1 0 0 0 0 36 02 2 0 14 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 03 2 0 I 16 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 37 04 3 0 0 20 12 0 0 0 0 0 33 05 2 0 0 14 16 I 2 0 0 0 0 33 06 2 0 I 18 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 E 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CjJ7o KF 2 0 14 18 I 0 0 0 0 0 34 PK 0 Q 0 11 it, 5 ~ 0 0 0 ~o t 18 TOTALFOR:GARLAND lJ 2 4 127 126-J\n7 4 0 0 01~71 027 GIBBS Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 2 13 9 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 02 2 11 9 II 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 03 2 12 6 14 9 2 I I 0 0 0 45 04 2 8 12 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 48 05 2 11 12 9 14 I I 0 0 0 0 48 06 2 14 7 11 JO 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 ~-\n7 KF 2 9 JO 10 JO 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 TOT AL FOR: GIBBS rf?\u0026gt;78 65 84 77 ,1.,\\ 4 2 1 0 0 o1 311 028 CHICOT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 3 10 9 26 24 3 0 0 0 0 73 02 3 8 6 22 '.3I 4 4 0 0 0 0 75 03 4 8 6 25 26 5 2 0 0 0 73 04 4 8 8 27 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 68 05 3 5 7 24 24 2 0 0 0 0 63 06 3 12 4 27 22 2 3 0 0 0 71 E 4 2 7 6 0 0 I 0 0 0 20 (, ,,. KF 4 6 7 23 16 3 4 0 0 0 0 59 PK JO 11 7 II 1~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 D Q-6_/). 35 TOT AL FOR: CHICOT f,1 71 56 192 178 ~12' 2 15 3 0 0 0 ~() 537 029 WESTHIL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 2 7 6 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 02 2 5 6 14 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 03 2 4 8 20 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 04 2 7 20 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 LRsD Information Services Department 6 -- -- :,\\II Enroll~ Students: 02-Oct-97 -- 05 2 9 7 16 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 06 2 8 12 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 7\u0026gt;1' KF 2 5 7 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL q?'45 47 114 108 fi'o 0 0 0 0 315 JEFFRSN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 14 15 14 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 02 3 26 19 17 11 0 0 0 0 0 74 03 3 24 15 18 15 0 I I 0 0 0 74 04 3 18 19 16 13 0 0 0 I 0 0 67 05 3 23 23 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 81 06 3 25 17 21 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 E 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ~7 KF 4 21 17 13 5 ~I 0 0 0 0 58 TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN ,\nf\"1 53 126 117 110~ 1 1 3 1 1 0 1 513 CLOVREL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 3 5 43 35 I 2 0 0 0 0 89 02 3 3 32 37 0 0 0 0 0 74 03 3 2 I 40 24 0 0 0 0 0 68 04 2 l 2 25 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 05 2 3 2 27 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 06 1 2 0 21 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 KF 4 0 4 31 35 1 0 0 0 0 72 1'f7' PK 4~ 12,: 17 ~ 0 2 0 0 0 0 t/7, 36 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR EL ~ 18 16 231 2384t\n2 7 0 0 0 0 11 512 032 DODD Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 10 5 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 3 5 5 11 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 I 3 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 04 2 4 7 11 II 1 0 0 0 0 35 05 2 5 11 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 06 2 4 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 E 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ~~7~ KF 2 -rl 6 3 4 9 ~I 0 0 0 0 0 23 TOT AL FOR: DODD 36 38 78 67 ,~ 4 0 0 0 0 ~ 224 033 MEADCLIF Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 7 23 21 0 0 0 0 58 LRSD Information Services Department 7 ---- -- - -- -!t\\1E1n ~lled ~tudents: 02-Oct-97 --- 02 3 7 4 26 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 56 03 2 2 2 23 18 0 0 0 1 0 47 04 2 3 2 22 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 45 05 2 5 3 13 17 0 0 0 0 40 06 2 5 4 20 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 fl1\" KF 2 6 4 16 13 ~o 0 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF ft. 33 26 143 120 '?Ju I 4 2 0 3 0 10 332 MITCHELL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 1 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 02 2 0 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 03 3 1 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 04 2 0 0 13 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 05 2 2 0 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06 2 0 2 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 E 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 KF 2 1 2 19 12 1 1 0 0 0 37 q-:,7o PK 2 .s 3 5 /3 8 0 0 0 0 0 _o 0 7.:1NJ8 TOT AL FOR: MITCHELL 8 8 114 109~1 I 0 0 0 I 3, 242 035 ML KING Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 5 31 22 30 35 I 0 0 0 0 0 119 02 4 20 21 20 25 0 0 0 I 0 0 87 03 3 13 25 26 21 0 0 0 0 0 86 04 3 16 15 21 19 0 2 2 0 0 76 05 3 15 13 29 16 I 0 4 I 0 80 06 2 14 JO IO 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 KF 5 20 17 31 23 0 0 0 0 0 92 ~~7 .. p (\\ 16 .3!:i 19 20 .3~75 ~ 0 0 0 I O I 0 '171 TOT AL FOR: M L KING ~\"6 145 142 187 167p 3  3 9 1 0 11 6-58 036 ROCKFELR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 3 13 9 13 18 0 I 0 0 0 55 02 3 8 7 15 19 0 0 I 0 0 SI 03 3 12 7 21 II 0 0 0 0 53 04 3 9 4 13 24 I 0 0 0 0 52 05 2 8 8 15 12 3 2 0 0 0 0 48 06 2 9 8 13 9 0 I 0 0 0 0 40 KF 4 II 9 15 16 0 0 0 0 53 PK 21 \"'-524 21 S-P29 0 0 O~l,,98 LRSD Information Services Department 8 A.II Enrolled Students: - l,~ 02-Oct-97 B11\u0026gt; 1u1 91 0 ,~ TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 76 126 138 /i 9 7 2 0 50 --- -- 037 GEYER SP Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total ---- - 01 2 5 5 17 15 2 0 0 1 0 0 45 02 2 1 7 12 22 0 2 0 0 0 0 44 03 2 3 3 14 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 04 2 6 2 13 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 05 1 1 3 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 06 2 2 7 22 6 0 I 0 0 0 0 38 7~7 KF 2 6 4 18 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 PK Lt' 7 ri 7 8 ,~ 10 :, 1 0 0~ 0.51~ 35 TOTAL FOR: GEYER SP 31 38 114 123 ?-1 4 4 0 0 JO 316 038 PULHTE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 8 15 29 20 0 1 0 1 0 0 74 02 3 14 11 14 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 03 4 18 14 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 04 3 22 20 22 12 2 0 0 0 0 79 05 2 18 13 22 25 0 0 0 0 0 79 06 2 10 16 17 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 ${\n~ KF 2 ~10 13 8 7~0 1 I 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: PUL HT E '/' 100 102 130 124 2 2 3 1 0 0 \u0026lt;t 464 039 RIGHTSEL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 0 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 2 0 0 20 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 2 0 1 11 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 04 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 05 2 0 20 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 39 06 2 0 0 19 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 KF 2 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 PK 5 3 2 ~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 ,So~ 18 q-\u0026gt;f'I TOT AL FOR: RIGHTSEL ,-:/1 5 106 128,-~ 1 1 0 1 0 0 ~ 249 040 ROMINE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 6 20 13 1 0 0 0 0 46 02 2 6 5 14 12 I 2 0 0 0 41 03 2 7 2 15 11 3 0 I 0 0 40 04 3 5 4 8 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 31 05 2 5 7 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 30 LRSD Information Services Department 9 All Enrolled Students: 02-Ocr-97 - -- - 06 6 4 7 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 28 E 2 I 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 KF 4 9 2 25 18 4 3 0 0 0 62 PK 6 I 8 7 /'! 11 0 0 I 2 0 -'/ I 50736 iJi TOT AL FOR: ROMINE op 51 39 114 92g'~l3 12 3 3 0 lj~\nJ ~ D 042 WASHNGTN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 6 14 18 22 26 3 4 I 0 0 89 02 4 17 12 31 25 4 2 I 0 0 0 92 03 4 17 17 25 26 4 0 0 2 0 0 91 04 2 19 8 19 16 I 0 2 I 0 67 05 3 26 12 27 10 5 2 0 0 84 06 4 18 27 20 19 I 2 2 3 0 0 92 i E I 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ~~/0 KF 4 12 8 30 22 4 4 2 0 1 0 83 _pK 1 8 ,\" 12 15.2.112 I 2 2 O Go 0 Ii, 53 TOTALFOR:WASHNGTN ~ 132 115 195 157~3 16 9 11 2 0 t,) 6.6,0. ., 043 WILLIAMS Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 14 17 16 19 0 0 0 69 02 3 17 14 16 20 0 0 0 0 69- 03 3 12 18 17 18 0 0 2 0 I 0 68 04 3 13 21 17 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 05 3 18 17 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 06 3 14 16 24 13 0 0 0 0 ~ ~i 69 KF 3 15 13 15 15 t 0 l 0 0 60 TOT AL FOR: WILLIAMS ~11103 116 123 125~ 0 0 5 4 1 2 / ~79 044 WILSON Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 3 26 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 46 02 2 3 17 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 03 3 2 4 14 25 2 0 0 0 0 l 48 04 2 4 6 23 16 l 0 0 0 0 51 05 2 3 3 18 15 0 0 0 0 0 40 06 2 5 2 19 14 0 0 0 0 0 41 E 2 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 i~r KF 3 0 6 32 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 PK 3 1 5 5 C, 4 I 0 0 0 0 0 50]- 18 TOT AL FOR: WILSON ~:?,25 28 170 127~,, 7 4 0 0 0 J ,\n, 362 LRSD Information Services Department IO . . 02-Oct-97 ---- ---- -- - - -- WOODRUFF Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 2 8 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 38 02 2 2 7 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 03 2 4 7 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 04 2 I 2 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 OS 2 6 3 17 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 06 I 6 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 KF 2 6 10 5 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 7/~ PK 6 ,~ 9 10 ii 8 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 ~37. .3 4 TOT AL FOR: WOODRUFF ~\\ 33 48 111 90\n/ ' 1 0 0 0 0 d\" 284 046 MABEL EL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 6 13 6 26 24 2 0 0 0 0 72 02 4 10 4 32 14 I 0 0 0 0 62 03 3 9 5 20 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 56 04 4 4 22 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 05 4 6 19 20 I 0 0 0 0 0 so 06 6 4 12 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 E 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 KF 3 8 9 19 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 PK q 3 1 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 \u0026lt;)~~ 16 117-- TOT AL FOR: MABEL EL q 57 42 156 143j-C\\ 7 2 0 0 0 0 ~ 407 047 TERRY Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 22 19 22 20 0 0 0 3 0 0 86 02 3 25 22 13 11 0 0 2 0 0 74 03 3 20 17 14 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 70 04 3 12 16 11 17 0 0 I 0 0 58 OS 3 25 15 IS 19 0 3 0 0 79 06 3 15 14 19 19 0 0 0 2 0 0 69 1t/f., KF 4\n\" 17 14 22 15 91 I 4 0 0 75 TOT AL FOR: TERRY 7 136 117 116 119(1' 1 3 5 13 0 l ~3511 048 FULBRIGH Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 5 16 26 16 23 0 1 I 0 0 0 83 02 3 10 25 22 8 I 0 0 0 0 0 66 03 3 17 24 19 9 0 0 0 0 71 04 3 18 18 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 OS 4 II 16 24 14 0 0 0 0 0 66 LRSD Information Services Department 11 -(\n) 0 -f /2 ~~l -::Pt-\u0026lt;~.,.,,(\"::\u0026gt; ~~5 .,/to ~1 7~/c\n~/ ?o ---1-i ~~,\ni_ /\n-0/ o/..3 /\n~7~ 6'-Y\no _t,,J~ //, -4(,ND I --vO 0 ..1// 9i)a ~ . /7~. /.7/1 19~7 /0~ 5~ I I... ~j ~ \"\\\\ (1'\nt~, ~,\n, 8, 'ti/ ~.r)\n~le,~ J -?, t/J.\n)p f/\nJ.Y ~~D 7? ~~7(~ 7~~ l,11JI J.c~O 1 30~ '10l -i/\n~~/ /19..80 ~ ~ /~cr:x) 70 c) \u0026amp; - -0 - /2 ------7 1/JIJ t~// c5, ?(Y~ $? I .:\n5:../ 6 7c7,,, /: /t I~ !\n?? 3,/f./ /a:J-/ ~\n21/ t\n7\n! ~( 3 //D 7, ~,_:\n.., .::?c-1 /qc::\n_J r\n,[{lo l\"c:,_ I -------------------------------------- AlEl nrolled Students~- ---- - 06 E KF TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH --------- 2 16 3 4 _J1 14 16 12 0 17 23 F 10s 142 134 19 0 0 0 14 po 106\nr 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 02-Oct-97 0 64 0 4 0 69 0 ~ 495 050 OTTERCR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: OTTER CR 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF 2 13 2 18 2 12 2 14 2 15 2 7 2 ~ 6 ,u 85 9 17 14 12 15 9 13 11 83 7 17 14 10 12 10 87 8 0 8 0 8 I 9 0 14 0 9 0 8 0 64 ,~, 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 47 49 50 54 49 43 ,\n.//, 1 36 1 ~ 328 051 WAKEFIEL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF 3 3 2 2 3 8 2 I 2 2 3 4 I 3 .1\\ ..\u0026gt;\\ 21 4 22 3 23 3 25 0 18 3. 26 6 20 I 25 20 159 19 0 15 0 31 I 26 0 15 2 35 I 22 ')\"2 163~9 6 0 0 I 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 43 0 70 0 45 0 0 66 0 52 0 ,o 373 052 WATSON Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: WATSON 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF ffi( LRSD nformation Services Department [\n/u? .\n,,,c ., ~/ 4 4 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 I 3 2 I 43 40 I 2 3 32 26 7 2 2 31 24 32 21 I 0 23 18 I 4 4 33 20 0 6 3 32 32 0 lt O ~ 2 20 31 14 0 ~ 22 24 238 203 )\\~ 4 0 /0 0 (\n. 9, ~ f-:.::\u0026gt;-' Z .:?f\n)..., /~tt:.wi/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 65 0 72 0 50 0 46 (? 1 '/Q 0 61 \"l:\u0026gt; 0 73 0 CJ\"{J3~6 0 /., 493 :::?:,. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993 BUILDING CAPACITIES SCHOOL CAPACITY sr\nNIQR HTQH S~HQ.Q. LS CENTRAL 1891 JA FAIR 954 HALL 1291 MCCLELLAN 1199 PARKVIEW 1000 METROPOLITAN N/A SUBTOTAL: 6335 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE 868 DUNBAR 812 FOREST HEIGHTS 858 HENDERSON 907 MABLEVALE 614. MANN 850 PULASKI HEIGHTS 745 SOUTHWEST 737 SUBTOTAL: 6391 ~L~~l:!TARY SCHOOLS \\q BADGET 257\n~BALE 401 J?BASELINE 390 UBOOKER 656 \\~BRADY 467 :\"\n-I1 CARVER 613 JqcmcoT 558 3 , CLOVERDALE 492 J' DODD 328 /\\~,,_F,A IR PARK 351 j CREST PARK 399 ~ 'o FRANKLIN 544 ~i FULBRIGHT 5-4-0 ------ - ..._ ........... .  . ~--.c._~#...-.-.c.,,-:..\n~ . . _..,.,_~---- ..,  1\": !.  Note #1 Note #1 Note #2\nPLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT  E, .. ?U~nQT,AND 31 346 GEYER SPRINGS 328 J-1GIBBS 4 9 ISH (CLOSED) 353 0 33~ --J EFFERSON 492 ING 692 t-tL~MABLEVALE 515\nlo MCDERMOTT 517 33HEADOWCLIFF 465 3-/MITCHEL 346 s-r\noTTER CREEK 351 Ji PULASKI HEIGHTS 374 3C?R IGHTSELL 346 3\u0026amp;, ROCKEFELLER 425 ,H}, ROMINE :tf/ STEPHENS 487 298 4JTERRY 515 51 WAKEFIELD 492 tf\n\u0026gt;WASHlNGTON 939 J\n}-WATSON a -t-i 492 WESTERN HILLS 328 ~ WILLIAMS 517 WILSON 394 45'WOODRUFF 324 SUBTOTAL: 16,332 Notes: Notes reflect changes from p::-eviously established capacities. Note #1: Capacities established 1992 submitted to Federal Court. Note #2: Capacity change from 1992 Desegregation Plan due to additional portable building added. ~ Note #2 Note #2 Note #2 j / F.YI. Date: /..x-.5, -9 7 ar'pm  Gene o Horace rn/ Margie D Melissa fil\"' Skip a,/ Polly IY Linda Return to: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION [OOL DISTRICT, ET AL. LR-C-82-866 SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED iHUA, ET AL. iT, ET AL. 1997 OFFIOCFE PLAINTIFF LRSD' s AMi~~Tro MONITORING PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INT ERVENO RS INTERVENORS ERVENORS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS r OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING LRSD'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL E REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Little Rock School District ( \"LRSD\") for its Answers t Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and reduction of Documents states: TORY NO. 1: Please state the name, title, address and telephone number of each and every individual assisting in the preparation of the answers to these interrogatories. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory requests information which is privileged under the work product doctrine and/or the attorney-client privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the following persons assisted in the preparation of these answers: Dr. Les Carnine, Christopher Heller and John C. Fendley, Jr. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: In 15 instances in paragraphs II. B. through II. P. of the proposed new plan, the words \"LRSD shall implement programs policies and/or procedures\" followed by a particular subject matter appear. Please identify separately for f:lhomo\\kndlcyllnd'dao-jooh.- CORRECTECDO PY1 0/01/97 LRSD ENROU.MFtH on ICl,4Lo c I Ollf:R I, 199i COi.ii~I HIGH SCHOOLS l-1 rl9_7 w  o I TOlAL 13/ BLK 9E.~!_R(IL_ __ ,,_-_ 1'101~ 7Y5 49 _- .tii~f--=-~9% FAIR I 612 137 8  7511 81% l~ALL 11 - 561 I 179 50 1'117001-it% MCCIf :LLAN. - -j! -.7 9(}! - 121 - 24 ~ --935 - 843/o PARK'IEW 464 403 - 44  - 911~51% ALE SR HIGH , 61 0 0 6 100% s_u_~!OTA_L_ ---3534 154~ .JI~---i~1 __ .?I~ JUNIORH IGHS- '- - ---t--.+ - CLOVERDALE 552  36 34J::: 622 ~% DuIJsAR I 442 ,82 47 1 - nil 57% FORESTI I EIGHTS. - 452 - 170 ---18 / - ij.joJ 70% HENDERSON -, 624 83 -ff-:_:- 1ffi- 86% MABELVALE 380 1'19 7 5o5 506 75% MANN I 446 375 37  858 52% PULASKHI EIGHTS 4371 315 15 767 57% SOUTHWEST I 426 651 19  510 83% ALE JR. HIGH 10 0 01 10~-100% SliafoTAL 1 3769 1453 194 5416 69% - ----------!!- - . I --- l - -- -- et.F.MENTARY-  ----'- 1 -~1'--- BADGEIr 214 19. -- or:- 233-- 92% BALE ---, ~ 2 6 6 '5 7 1 7 38 1 26 - 362 73% BASELINE 18 v 323 83% BOOKER 11 308 2611 28  597 52% BRADY I 235 94 43 v 372 63% CARVER-----, 312 259 25 - 59~i CHICOT 370 121 46 - 537 69% CLOVERDALE ,,::_-469~ 30 -- . 13 V . Yl~ Jl2% DOUD 145 74 5 , 2241 65% FftJRPARK I 188 50 10 , 248 76% FOHESTP ARK 205 219 6 - 430 48% FRANKLIN ~--427 24 13 V 464 --927, FULBRIGITI ---240 -- 246 ___ l :-- 495- 43% GARLAND 1 253 3 15 - 271 93% GEYER SPRINGS 2371 66 13 316 75% GIBBS 161 133 17 - 311 52% JEFFERSON -- 227 2/9 7 ...,. 513 44% KING 354 279 25 - 658 --54~-\n- MABELVALE-- '- 299 __ 92 -- 161  - 407 - 73% MCDERMOTT 273 181 23 - 4 77 57% MEAOOWCLiFF 2_~ _ 57, 12 - 332 79% MITCHELL 223 91 10  242 92% OTTER CREEK '151 167 1of, -m 46% PULASKHI EIGHTS 254 - 193. ... 17 - 464 55% RIGHTSELL 234 9 6 - 249 94% ROCKEFELLER -~ 153 33 450 59% ROMINE 206 78 44 ~ 328 63% TERRY 7.35 243 33 -:: ..... 511 46% WAKEFIELD 322 ~2 -- im-373 86% WASHINGTON 352 2!~ --- 95 :: 660 53% WATSON 441 40 12  49:J U9% WESTERNH ILLS 222 91 21 315 ~ wILuAMs 24a rn ___ Jzl. 479 ~ WILSON 297 53 12  362 8?.% wo65RiJFF- '--201-----:,s -o-=--784---fi SUBT OTAL. 9362 4166 -688 14216- 65% I GRANDT OTAL 16665! 7164 1057 24886 67% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Amboy Elementary School 6002-050 K-05  White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Grade Totals M F M F M F M F K 52 14 8 15 15 0 0 0 0 01 68 20 6 10 29 2 0 0 1 02 78 19 16 20 21 2 0 0 0 03 68 18 13 22 15 0 0 0 0 04 71 21 15 13 22 0 0 0 0 05 63 13 20 .\".I. 12 17 .I 1 0 0 0 Totals 400 105 78 1 \" 92 119~ 5 0 0 1 Percentages 26.3% 19.5% 23.0% 29.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 45.8% 52.8% ~~io 1.3% 0.3% Grades 1-5 348 91 70 77 104 5 0 0 1 Percentages 26.1% 20.1% 22.1% 29.9% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 46.3% 52.0% 1.4% 0.3% Aml/Als M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 ~ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% NOV2 l 1997 OFFOICFE DESEGREMGAmTJIITOONR ING North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Belwood Elementary School 6002-053 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 19 2 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 35 8 8 11 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 20 5 1 4 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 03 23 5 2 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 18 4 2 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 25 4 7 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 6 3 0 _Q 2 1 ,,..,\u0026amp;.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 \"'\\... Totals 146 31 28.., 46 39\" 0 2 0 0 0 0 - Percentages 21.2% 19.2% 31.5% 26.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.4% 58.2% 6Y\u0026gt;7 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 127 29 20 39 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.8% 15.7% 30.7% 29.1% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.6% 59.8% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Boone Park Elementary School 6002-054 J-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F - M F M F M F  J 35 0 2 / 17 15 r 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 71 4 3 34 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 83 4 8 30 40 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 58 5 0 28 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 03 60 5 4 33 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 69 4 4 35 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 59 5 2 - 31 20 -t 0 1 0 0 0 0 /_ Totals 435 27 23\" 208 171-'' 4 2 0 0 0 0 ~ Percentages 6.2% 5.3% 47.8% 39.3% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5% 87.1% i1J. 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 329 23 18 157 126 3 2 0 0 0 0 Percentages 7.0% 5.5% 47.7% 38.3% 0.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 86.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Crestwood Elementary School 6002-055 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 44 12 17 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 51 11 17 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 51 11 13 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 39 12 12 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 49 12 19 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 31 11 8 ~, 5 6 _c 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Totals 265 69 86 ,., 59 50 ,- 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 26.0% 32.5% 22.3% 18.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 58.5% 41.1% \u0026gt;J7I . 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 221 57 69 51 43 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 25.8% 31.2% 23.1% 19.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57.0% 42.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Glenview Elementary School 6002-056 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 25 1 1 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 31 3 3 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 22 2 2 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 24 2 5 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 22 1 1 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 34 4 5 -ri 12 13 ,..,,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Totals 158 13 17' 69 59 \" 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Percentages 8.2% 10.8% 43.7% 37.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% %17  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 133 12 16 52 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 9.0% 12.0% 39.1% 39.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Indian Hills Elementarv School 6002-057 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 63 19 23 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 76 17 17 14 26 1 0 0 0 1 0 02 80 20 16 20 19 1 1 0 3 0 0 03 61 11 13 19 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 04 64 11 11 20 20 0 1 1 0 0 0 05 50 14 7 -' 11 18 _,.,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,r,. Totals 394 92 87,, 94 Iller 3 2 1 3 1 0 Percentages 23.4% 22.1% 23.9% 28.2% 0.8% 0.5% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 45.4% 52.0% a--]. 1.3% 1.0% 0.3% Grades 1-5 331 73 64 84 100 3 2 1 3 1 0 Percentages 22.1% 19.3% 25.4% 30.2% 0.9% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 41.4% 55.6% 1.5% 1.2% 0.3% North Little Rock Public Schools October l, 1997 Lakewood Elementarv School 6002-058 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 26 8 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 39 7 10 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 39 7 8 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 41 11 8 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 36 10 4 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 37 8 8 ~ 11 10 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 II\" Totals 218 51 43 '' 66 58 1v 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 23.4% 19.7% 30.3% 26.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 43.1% 56.9% j77-\u0026gt; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grades l-5 192 43 38 60 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.4% 19.8% 31.3% 26.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 57.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Lynch Drive Elementary School 6002-060 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 66 9 19 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 58 3 8 24 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 73 11 9 26 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 71 13 7 27 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 75 10 12 29 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 60 8 12 ...\\. . 21 19 \"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Totals 403 54 67 I\" 145 136,::, 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 13.4% 16.6% 36.0% 33.7% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 69.7% 10? 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 337 45 48 127 116 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 13.4% 14.2% 37.7% 34.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.6% 72.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Meadow Park Elementary School 6002-061 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 23 3 8 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 21 4 2 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 34 3 7 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 40 2 8 14 14 0 0 1 1 0 0 04 34 5 8 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 25 7 2 _o 9 7 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,'!!I, Totals 177 24 35 ~ 60 56 I 0 0 1 1 - 0 0 Percentages 13.6% 19.8% 33.9% 31.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 65.5% (,~\n. 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Grades 1-5 154 21 27 51 53 0 0 1 1 0 0 Percentages 13.6% 17.5% 33.1% 34.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 31.2% 67.5% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1 997 North Heii hts Elementary School 6002-063 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 72 20 22 10 16 3 0 1 0 0 0 01 90 22 18 18 25 3 4 0 0 0 0 02 71 13 18 24 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 03 75 22 10 22 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 04 81 18 18 18 18 5 4 0 0 0 0 05 84 15 26 .. ..~\n19 17 .. 3 4 0 0 0 0 4V Totals 473 110 112\"' 111 102 \u0026lt;II\" 20 17 1 0 0 0 , Percentages 23.3% 23.7% 23.5% 21.6% 4.2% 3.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.9% 45.0% ~7- 7.8% 0.2% 0.0% Grades 1-5 401 90 90 101 86 17 17 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.4% 22.4% 25.2% 21.4% 4.2% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.9% 46.6% 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October I, 1997 Park Hill Elementary School 6002-064 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 40 10 13 9 7 0 I 0 0 0 0 01 44 10 10 17 6 0 I 0 0 0 0 02 43 9 12 12 9 0 I 0 0 0 0 03 41 14 7 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 40 10 6 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 I 05 37 11 7 ,,q 7 11 _, 0 0 0 0 1 0 ~ Totals 245 64 55 I 71 50 '\" 0 3 0 0 1 1 - Percentages 26.1% 22.4% 29.0% 20.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 48.6% 49.4% ..-/~1-1.2% 0.0% 0.8% Grades 1-5 205 54 42 62 43 0 2 0 0 1 I Percentages 26.3% 20.5% 30.2% 21.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 46.8% 51.2% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Pike View Elementary School 6002-065 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 61 12 10 19 18 0 1 1 0 0 0 01 71 16 11 23 18 1 0 1 1 0 0 02 67 14 14 24 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 03 49 14 11 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 42 12 9 8 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 05 46 11 15 .,.i.' 11 8 ,,.,C 1 0 0 0 0 0 ,, Totals 336 79 70 I 93 86 I 2 1 3 2 0 0 ... Percentages 23.5% 20.8% 27.7% 25.6% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 44.3% 53.3% S37 0.9% 1.5% 0.0% Grades 1-5 275 67 60 74 68 2 0 2 2 0 0 Percentages 24.4% 21.8% 26.9% 24.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 46.2% 51.6% 0.7% 1.5% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Redwood Pre-School 6002-067 J-K White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Ami/Ats Grade Totals M F ., M Fm~.. M F M F M F .... J 108 5 6 ,, 52 43. 1 1 0 0 0 0 .., K 27 0 0 14 13 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Totals 135 5 6 II 66 56 lrT 1 1 0 0 0 0 C7 Percentages 3.7% 4.4% 48.9% 41.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 90.4% 107. 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Seventh Street Elementary School 6002-069 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 90 8 5 39 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 46 6 4 15 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 70 6 6 24 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 70 10 13 30 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 04 56 15 16 10 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 48 7 16 J' ~ 13 12 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Totals 380 52 60 n- 131 136,. 0 0 1 0 0 0 Percentages 13.7% 15.8% 34.5% 35.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 29.5% 70.3% 707. 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Grades 1-5 290 44 55 92 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 Percentages 15.2% 19.0% 31.7% 33.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.1% 65.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL ELEMENTARY White - Black .n Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F ~ ,7 M F ..,,\" M F M F M F ,,-: Totals 4165 776 767 1 - 1311 1229\" 35 30 7 7 2 1 ~ Percentages 18.6% 18.4% 31.5% 29.5% 0.8% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 37.0% 61.0% ~I 7. 1.6% 0.3% 0.1% Grade 1-5 3343 649 617 1027 978 30 27 5 7 2 1 Percentages 19.4% 18.5% 30.7% 29.3% 0.9% 0.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 37.9% 60.0% 1.7% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Central Sixth Grade School 6002-059 06-06 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 06 664 152 140 .c i)I 178 185 ,, 3 4 1 0 0 1 ,., Totals 664 152 140\n 178 185~- 3 4 1 0 0 l ., Percentages 22.9% 21.1% 26.8% 27.9% 0.5% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 44.0% 54.7% .s5r 1.1% 0.2% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Lakewood Middle School 6002-070 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 264 73 78 58 50 3 1 0 1 0 0 08 268 84 69 I 56 52 ' ~ 1 2 1 2 0 1 - Totals 532 157 147 }\" 114 10211' 4 3 1 3 0 1 I\" Percentages 29.5% 27.6% 21.4% 19.2% 0.8% 0.6% 0.2% o.6% 0.0% 0.2% 57.1% 40.6% .\u0026gt;/11  1.3% 0.8% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Ridgeroad Middle School 6002-072 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 354 69 52 112 115 2 4 0 0 0 0 08 300 54 57 ~89 88 .I j 3 8 0 0 0 1 ,(/ Totals 654 123 109~ 201 203 ., 5 12 0 0 0 1 J w Percentages 18.8% 16.7% 30.7% 31.0% 0.8% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 35.5% 61.8% t,?-1 2.6% 0.0% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Rose City Middle School 6002-077 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 195 38 34 59 63 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 142 25 25 43 46 1 0 1 1 0 0 09 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 ,cl 2 0 f, 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Totals 347 64 61 1, 107 1110' 2 0 1 1 0 0 ,, Percentages 18.4% 17.6% 30.8% 32.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 36.0% 62.8% (i$7, 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% ' North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 North Little Rock High School-East Campus 6002-075 09-10 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 09 690 192 150 155 183 5 3 1 1 0 0 10 675 158 127 vt 180 197 6 5 1 0 0 1 -\" Totals 1365 350 277 (,o 335 380 ,  11 8 2 1 0 1 (7 Percentages 25.6% 20.3% 24.5% 27.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 45.9% 52.4% ~~7 1.4% 0.2% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October I, 1997 North Little Rock High School-West Campus 6002-076 09-12 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 09 53 7 1 26 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 114 24 8 47 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 612 164 148 123 164 2 6 2 3 0 0 12 525 144 125 -::\\: 114 124 ,:\n~ 7 5 2 4 0 0 - '3 Totals 1304 339 282 IT 310 340\" 11 11 4 7 0 0~ I Percentages 26.0% 21.6% 23.8% 26.1% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 47.6% 49.8% :\n,\nJ/ o 1.7% 0.8% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Argenta Academy 6002-076 06-12 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 06 9 3 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 07 7 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 15 3 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 25 8 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 48 9 2 21 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 35 4 3 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 3 2 I 9 7 ' 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Totals 161 31 10 'T' 78 38 \"\"' 2 2 0 0 0 0 I Percentages 19.3% 6.2% 48.4% 23.6% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5% 72.0% 7'\u0026gt;} 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL DISTRICT White ,_ Black ,J Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F,11 i ... M F e:,. , M F M F M F .\u0026lt;I) . Totals 9192 1992 1793' 2634 2588' 73 70 16 19 2 5 ,~ Percentages 21.7% 19.5% 28.7% 28.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 41.2% 56.8% 67? 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% Grade 1-5 8370 1865 1643 2350 2337 68 67 14 19 2 5 Percentages 22.3% 19.6% 28.1% 27.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 41.9% 56.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL SECONDARY White .l\"V Black .. -Y Hispanic Asian/PI Arnl/Als Grade Totals M F ~M M F 'l.l '!\u0026gt;\" M F M F M F ,D Totals 5027 1216 1026\" 1323 1359 38 40 9 12 0 4 Percentages 24.2% 20.4% 26.3% 27.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 44.6% 53.4% -5l7- 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 SUMMARY BY GRADE White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F ~ M F.,.( M F M F M F 2 Pre-School 143 5 8 ,, 69 58 \"' 2 1 0 0 0 0 - 3.5% 5.6% 48.3% 40.6% 1.4% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 88.8% ~,. 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Kindergarten 679 122 142 215 193 3 2 2 0 0 0 18.0% 20.9% 31.7% 28.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.9% 60.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 01 713 131 122 207 234 7 8 1 2 1 0 19.3% 18.0% 30.5% 34.5% 1.0% 1.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 37.3% 64.9% 2.2% 0.4% 0.1% 02 706 125 122 225 215 9 6 0 4 0 0 17.7% 17.3% 31.9% 30.5% 1.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 62.3% 2.1% 0.6% 0.0% 03 662 139 113 231 170 4 2 2 1 0 0 21.0% 17.1% 34.9% 25.7% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 38.1% 60.6% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 04 657 133 125 192 194 5 5 2 0 0 1 20.2% 19.0% 29.2% 29.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 39.3% 58.8% 1.5% 0.3% 0.2% 05 599 118 135 170 164 5 6 0 0 1 0 19.7% 22.5% 28.4% 27.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 42.2% 55.8% 1.8% 0.0% 0.2% 06 679 158 140 184 187 4 4 1 0 0 1 23.3% 20.6% 27.1% 27.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 43.9% 54.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 07 820 181 164 235 228 6 5 0 1 0 0 22.1% 20.0% 28.7% 27.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 42.1% 56.5% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0% 08 725 166 152 198 187 5 10 2 3 0 2 22.9% 21.0% 27.3% 25.8% 0.7% 1.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 43.9% 53.1% 2.1% 0.7% 0.3% 09 771 207 153 197 202 7 3 1 1 0 I 0 26.8% 19.8% 25.6% 26.2% 0.9% I 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% o.o I 0.0% 46.7% 51.8% 1.3% 0.3% 0.0% 110 I 841 192 I 138 248 I 248 7 I 6 1 I 0 0 I 1 I I 22.8% I 16.4% 29.5% I 29.5% o.8% I o.7% 0.1% I 0.0% 0.0% I 0.1% 39.2% 59.0% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 111 I 648 168 I 152 138 I 177 2 I 6 2 I 3 0 I 0 I I 25.9% I 23.5% 21.3% 127.3% o.3% I o.9% o.3% I o.5% 0.0% I 0.0% 49.4% 48.6% 1.2% 0.8% 0.0% 112 I 549 147 I 121 125 I 131 7 I 6 2 I 4 0 I 0 I I 26.8% I 23.1% 22.8% I 23.9% 1.3% I 1.1% 0.4% I o.7% 0.0% I 0.0% 49.9% 46.6% 2.4% 1.1% 0.0% I District I 9192 1992 I 1793 26341 2588 73 I 70 16 I 19 21 5 I I 21.7% I 19.5% 28.7% 128.2% 0.8% I 0.8% 0.2% I 0.2% 0.0% I 0.1% 41.2% 56.8% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% I District I 8370 1865 I 1643 23501 2337 681 67 14 I 19 21 5 !Grades 1-12 I 22.3% I 19.6% 28.1% 127.9% o.8% I o.8% 0.2% I 0.2% 0.0% I 0.1% 41.9% 56.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA *60-02-050 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOO GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 52 22 30 R 01 68 29 39 02 78 37 41 mv 21 1997 03 68 31 37 OFFIOCFE 04 71 36 35 DESEGREMGOANTIITOONR ING 05 63 34 29 SCHOOL 400 189 211 TOTALS 47.3% 52.8% GRADES 348 167 181 01-05 48.0% 52.0%  PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-058 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :OUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 26 13 13 01 39 17 22 02 39 15 24 03 41 19 22 04 36 14 22 05 37 16 21 SCHOOL 218 94 124 TOTALS 43.1% 56.9% GRADES 192 81 111 01-05 42.2% 57.8% LEA #60-02-054 :ouNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 35 K 71 01 83 02 58 03 60 04 69 05 59 SCHOOL 435 TOTALS GRADES 329 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 32 7 64 13 70 8 50 9 51 8 61 8 51 56 379 12.9% 87.1% 46 283 14.0% 86.0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-069 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEMENT GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 90 13 77 01 46 10 36 02 70 12 58 03 70 24 46 04 56 31 25 05 48 23 25 SCHOOL 380 113 267 TOTALS 29.7% 70.3% GRADES 290 100 190 01-05 34.5% 65.5% LEA #60-02-060 :OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 66 01 58 02 73 03 71 04 75 05 60 SCHOOL 403 TOTALS GRADES 337 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 28 38 12 46 20 53 20 51 22 53 20 40 122 281 30.3% 69.7% 94 243 27.9% 72.1% LEA 160-02-061 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 23 01 21 02 34 03 40 04 34 05 25 SCHOOL 177 TOTALS GRADES 154 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 11 12 6 15 10 24 12 28 13 21 9 16 61 116 34.5% 65.5% 50 104 32.5% 67.5% LEA i60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 72 01 90 02 71 03 75 04 81 05 84 SCHOOL 473 TOTALS GRADES 401 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTA GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 46 26 47 43 37 34 37 38 45 36 48 36 260 213 55.0% 45.0% 214 187 53.4% 46.6% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-055 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 44 29 15 01 51 28 23 02 51 24 27 03 39 24 15 04 49 31 18 05 31 20 11 SCHOOL 265 156 109 TOTALS 58.9% 41.1% GRADES 221 127 94 01-05 57.5% 42.5% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-064 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 40 24 16 01 44 21 23 02 43 22 21 03 41 21 20 04 40 17 23 05 37 19 18 SCHOOL 245 124 121 TOTALS 50.6% 49.4% GRADES 205 100 105 01-05 48.8% 51. 2% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-065 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 61 24 37 01 71 30 41 02 67 29 38 03 49 25 24 04 42 22 20 05 46 27 19 SCHOOL 336 157 179 TOTALS 46.7% 53.3% GRADES 275 133 142 01-05 48.4% 51. 6% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-053 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :::ouNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 19 10 9 01 35 17 18 02 20 7 13 03 23 7 16 04 18 6 12 05 25 11 14 06 6 3 3 SCHOOL 146 61 85 TOTALS 41. 8% 58.2% GRADES 127 51 76 01-05 40.2% 59.8% LEA #60-02-056 -:'.OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 25 01 31 02 22 03 24 04 22 05 34 SCHOOL 158 TOTALS GRADES 133 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 2 23 6 25 4 18 7 17 2 20 9 25 30 128 19.0% 81.0% 28 105 21.1% 78.9% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-057 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTAR GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 63 42 21 01 76 36 40 02 80 41 39 03 61 25 36 04 64 24 40 05 50 21 29 SCHOOL 394 189 205 TOTALS 48.0% 52.0% GRADES 331 147 184 01-05 44.4% 55.6% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 108 K 27 SCHOOL 135 TOTALS GRADES 0 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 13 95 0 27 13 122 9.6% 90.4% 0 0 .0% .0% ELEMENTARY NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS ELEM 4165 1625 2540 WITH K 39.0% 61.0% ELEM 3343 1338 2005 01-05 40.0% 60.0% LEA #60-02-076 :ouNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 53 10 114 11 612 12 525 SCHOOL 1304 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 11-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 10 43 32 82 325 287 287 238 654 650 50.2% 49.8% LEA #60-02-075 2OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 10 690 675 SCHOOL 1365 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 09-10 NON-BLACK 352 298 650 47.6% BLACK 338 377 715 52.4% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-076 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :::OUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL 06 9 4 5 07 7 1 6 08 15 4 11 09 25 10 15 10 48 13 35 11 35 7 28 12 22 6 16 SCHOOL 161 45 116 TOTALS 28.0% 72.0% LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 354 08 300 SCHOOL 654 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 127 123 250 38.2% BLACK 227 177 404 61. 8% LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 264 08 268 SCHOOL 532 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 156 160 316 59.4% BLACK 108 108 216 40.6% LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 195 08 142 09 3 10 4 11 1 12 2 SCHOOL 347 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK BLACK 73 122 53 89 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 2 129 218 37.2% 62.8% LEA #60-02-059 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 664 SCHOOL 664 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CENTRAL 6TH GRADE CENT NON-BLACK 301 301 45.3% BLACK 363 363 54.7% GRADE SPAN: 06 SECONDARY TOTALS SEC 5027 NON-BLACK 2345 46.6% BLACK 2682 53.4% DISTRICT NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS 9192 3970 5222 43.2% 56.8% W/0 8370 3683 4687 GR K\u0026amp;J 44.0% 56.0% NCOIB) T IBII LIITTILJEJ E(O)CIBC:1 F1IJIB3CILCI IC CIB (I0 )(0)I L~ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET December 5, 1997 Memo To: Mellisa Guiden, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: School Building Capacities Enclosed is a copy of North Little Rock School District Building Capacities Report. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK. AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 STEP 1- 1997-98 School Building Capacity REDWOOD (without portable) CURRENT USE ONL Y--ACTUAL CAPACITY NOT CALCULATED Identify each room by use and capacity. 6 Pre K 2 K 1 Special X18=108 X 20 = 40 X 2 = 2 I.  STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity I. - AMBOY ELEMENTARY (with double portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 K 10 1-3, 3/4 6 4-5 4 Special 1 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 230 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 32 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 495 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 (Computer room not included in calculations) = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 489 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 440 CURRENT CAPACITY - 440 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity AMBOY ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 9 6 4 K 1, 3 /4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 32 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 449 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 (Computer room not included in calculations) = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 443 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 399 CURRENT CAPACITY - 399 STEP.1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BELWOOD ELEMENTARY (with portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 1 4 2 5 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 20 X23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 =40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 202 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 1997-98 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 196 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 176 CURRENT CAPACITY= 176 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BELWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 1 1 1 5 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X20 = 20 X 23 = 23 X 25 = 25 X 8 =40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 108 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1 02 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 92 CURRENT CAPACITY= 92 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 9 6 6 3 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 80 X 23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 48 X 23 = 69 1997-98 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 554 (Pre-School (2 rooms) and computer lab not included in calculations.) Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 548 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 493 CURRENT CAPACITY - 493 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY (with double portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 6 3 4 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 138 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 32 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 305 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 299 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 269 CURRENT CAPACITY - 269 ------ ----- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Buildlng Capacity CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 5 3 3 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 115 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 24 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 27 4 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 268 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 241 CURRENT CAPACITY - 241 1997-98 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. I I 2 K X20 = 40 I 3 1-3,3/4 X23= 69 2 4-5 X25 = 50 I 6 Special X 8= 48 I 2 Special X23 = 46 I I STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 253 I STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 I (Computer lab not counted) I I STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical I Capacity\" = 247 I STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 222 I I CURRENT CAPACITY - 222 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity IND/AN HILLS ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 K X20= 60 I 11 1-3 X 23 = 253 I 4 4-5 X 25 = 100 I 1 Ortho/Special X23 = 23 I 7 Special/Othro X 8= 56 I STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 492 I I STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 I I STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical I Capacity\" = 486 I STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 437 I I CURRENT CAPACITY - 437 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 5 3 5 1 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 40 X 23 = 115 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 293 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 287 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 258 CURRENT CAPACITY - 258 -------- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify eag_h room by use and capacity. 4 9 6 7 4 K, K-1 1, 2, 3, (3,4) 4, 5 Special Ed Special X 20 = 80 X23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 56 X23 = 92 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 585 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included in calculations.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 579 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 521 CURRENT CAPACITY - 521 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY (with portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 4 2 6 K, K-1 1-3,3/4 4-5 Resource X 20 = 40 X 23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 = 48 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 230 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 224 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\"= 202 CURRENT CAPACITY - 202 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 4 2 5 K, K-1 1-3,3/4 4-5 Resourc:e X20 = 40 X 23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 = 40 STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 222 STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 216 STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 194 CURRENT CAPACITY - 194 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY (with portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 11 6 2 6 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special Resource X 20 = 80 X 23 = 253 X 25 = 150 X 23 = 46 X 8 = 48 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 577 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 571 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\"= 514 CURRENT CAPACITY= 514 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY (without portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 K, K-1 10 1-3, 3/4 6 4-5 5 Resource X 20 = 80 X 23 = 230 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 500 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 494 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 445 CURRENT CAPACITY= 445 I ,\u0026amp;./ f,. w STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity PARK HILL ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 6 3 5 1 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 40 X 23 = 138 X 25= 75 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 316 Special Adjustments - Speech -6= -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 310 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 279 CURRENT CAPACITY - 279 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 8 4 5 1 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 184 X 25 = 100 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 407 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 401 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 361 CURRENT CAPACITY - 361 --------------------------- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 5 K X 20 = 100 8 1-3 X 23 = 184 4 4-5 X 25 = 100 6 Special X 8 = 48 2 Special X23 = 46 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 478 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included also 4 Speciality classrooms not counted) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 472 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 425 CURRENT CAPACITY - 425 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 6 School Building Capacity POPLAR STREET MIDDLE (with portables) Identify each room by use and capacity - Sixth grade rooms. 37 rooms-A102, A108, A109, A111, A112, G1, G2, P1, P2, P3, P4, 101, 103, 105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,200,201,202,203,204, 2058, 207,208,209,210,211,212,213, 214@25 = 925 8-Resource-A 110, A 104A, A 1048, PS, 102, 102A, 205A, 205C @ 8=64 (Not counted 115) Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 989 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 983 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 836 CURRENT CAPACITY - 836 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 6 School Building Capacity POPLAR STREET MIDDLE (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity - Sixth grade rooms. 33 rooms-A102, A108, A109, A111, A112, G1, G2, 101,103,105,106,107,108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 2058, 207, 208, 209, 210,211,212,213, 214@25 = 825 7-Resource-A110, A104A, A1048, 102, 102A, 205A, 205C@8=56 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 881 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 875 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 7 44 CURRENT CAPACITY - 7 44 ... .I/ ,~ ' '1 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD MIDDLE (with portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 28 regular rooms - Gym, Gym, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,202,203,204,206,207,209,210,211,212,213,214 215, Choir, 405, Band @ 25 = 700 3 Special Education rooms - 106, 201, 205 @ 15 = 45 Rooms 200A, 2008, 208, 215 @ 8 = 24 Rooms 101 and Portable SAC are used for pull out programs not considered - 0 STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 769 STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Room 201 1/2 (-12), Choir 1/2 (-13), 405 only (-21) = -46 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 723 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 615 CURRENT CAPACITY - 615 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD MIDDLE (without portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 27 regular rooms - Gym, Gym, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110,111,202,203,204,206,207,209,210,211,212,213,214,215, Choir, 405, Band @ 25 = 675 3 Special Education rooms - 106, 201, 205 @ 15 = 45 Rooms 200A, 2008, 208@ 8 = 24 Rooms 101 and 107 are used for pull out programs not considered - O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 7 44 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments - Room 201 1/2 (-12), Choir 1/2 (-13), 405 only (-21) = -46 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 698 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 593 CURRENT CAPACITY - 593 STEP 1 - 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity RIDGEROAD MIDDLE (with portables) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, oi: curriculum. 28 regular rooms - FA 1, F A2., Gym 1, Gym 2, G6, G8, P4, 103, 122, 123,124,125,126,127,129,130,132,134,136,221,222,223,224, 226, 227, 229, P1 @25 = 700 11 Special Education room - C1, G3, G4,G5, L 1, 104, 128, P3, 225, 228, 231 @ 8 = 88 Rooms 102 (computer lab), Speech and P2 (SAC) are used for pull out programs not considered. = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 788 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -49 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 739 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\"= 628 CURRENT CAPACITY - 628 ---------- 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity RIDGEROAD MIDDLE (without portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 26 regular rooms - FA1, FA2, Gym 1, Gym 2, G6, GS, 103, 121, 122, 123, 124,125,126,127,129,130,132,134,136,221,222,223,224,226, 227, 229, @ 25 = 650 10 Special Education r.ooms - C1, G3, G4,G5, L 1,104,128,225,228,231 @8 = 80 Rooms 102 (computer lab) and Speech are used for pull out programs not considered. = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 730 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -49 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\"= 681 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 579 CURRENT CAPACITY - 579 STEP 1- 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity ROSE CITY MIDDLE ( without portable) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 19regularrooms-105, S1, S2, S3, 106,109,110,111,112,115, 116, Art, HE1, HE2, Gym 1, Gym 2, FA, THE, LAB@ 25 = 475 11 Special Education rooms - 100,102, 103, 104, 108, 114, 113, 117, 118,119, Shop@8 = 88 Rooms 101, 107 are used for pull out programs not considered = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 563 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -Room 116 1/2 (-12), HE2 1/2 (-13) = -25 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 538 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 457 CURRENT CAPACITY -457 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 7 -12 School Building Capacity ARGENTA ACADEMY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 16 X 8 = 128 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 128 Special Adjustments - Program still evolving. Adaptable. Does not count seats unless full time assignment possible. Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 128 Multiply by 100% to determine \"Capacity\" = 128 CURRENT CAPACITY - 128 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 9-10 School Building Capacity NLRHS - EAST CAMPUS (with portable) (112 for Jr. High) 1997-98 Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 60 regular rooms - Stage, 501, 502, 504, 5058, 101, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,200,202,204,205, 206,207,208,209,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219, 220,221,222,223,224,225,301,302,303,304,305,306,401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 503, Gym 1, Gym 2, Gym 3, Gym 4, Gym 5, LR1, 60@25 = 1500 Reading rooms - P1, 203 @ 15 = 30 9 Special Education rooms -102A, 1028, 102C, 1020, 114A, 1148, LR, 210, 201@ 8 = 72 Room 104, P2, and P3 is used for pull out programs not considered = 0 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1602 Special Adjustments - 202 (-8), 501 (-12) = -20 Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1597 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1357 CURRENT CAPACITY - 1357 (Divide by 2 for 9th grade) 678 10th grade - Multiply STEP 4 by 80% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1278 (Divide by 2 for 10th grade) 639 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 9-10 School Building Capacity 1997-98 NLRHS - EAST CAMPUS (without portable) (112 for Jr. High) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 58 regular rooms - Stage, 501, 502, 504, 5058, 101, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,200,201, 205,206,207, 208,209,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219, 220,221,222,223,224,225,301,302,303,304,305,306,401, 402, 403, 405, 406, 503, Gym 1, Gym 2, Gym 3, Gym 4, Gym 5 @ 25 = 1450 Reading rooms - 203 @ 15 = 15 9 Special Education rooms - LR, 102A, 1028, 102C, 102D, 114A, 1148, 201, 210@8 = 72 Room 104 is used for pull out programs not considered = 0 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1537 Special Adjustments - 202 (-8), 501 (-12) = -20 Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1517 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1289 CURRENT CAPACITY -1289 (Divide by 2 for 9th grade) 644 10th grade - Multiply STEP 4 by 80% to determine \"Capacity\"= 1214 (Divide by 2 for 10th grade) 607 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 11-12 School Building Capacity 1997-98 NLRHS - WEST CAMPUS (without portable) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 50, 54, 55, 56,101,109,111,112,113,114,115,117,118,200,201,202,203, 204,205A, 206,210, 212,213A, 214,217,218,222,302,304, 305A, 306, 308,311,403,404,406,407,408,409,410,413,414,416,417,510, 511, 512, G1, G2, G3, 600, 601, 603, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, stage---- 60 X 25 = 1500 21, 22, 23----3 X 15 = 45 207, 412----2 X 10 = 20 208,209,215,216,215,219,220,400,401,419,611, G4----12 X 8 = 96 602---1 X 5 = 5 11 2--- 1 X 2 = 2 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1668 Special Adjustments - none Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1668 Multiply by 80% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1334 CURRENT CAPACITY - 1334 ----- NOV-21-F9R7I 1 0:13A M PULASCKOSI CHOOLS Ft-'lNXO 4. 900483 P. 02 - a: - -.- . , OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLLMENTR EPORT ., (Revised 10-28-97) % w-mE FVC':C HISHIN!C NIDN' P. :fSLAi'.'D J:M.ihl\"'ES\u0026lt;J}{) SCHOOL EJiS GIHS IDS Grn.S KJJS GIRS B:lIS GIRE KhS GIH.S 1DrAL Adkins 88 '\",t 7 6 70 ,11 4 7 l 1 d' 283 -f' Arnold Drive 139 ~'\\]59 41 i6 44 2 5 l \u0026lt;l 391 ~ Baker 124 Pf26 35 (,~ 30 l I 316 ~Bates 1f'I ~'?,132 -'I 466 b4 111 88 131 2 2 Bayou Meta 289 ~?96 7 '\"' 9 6 3 l 2 l 13 614 3 Cato 211 .,/Or 9 s 62 11~ 54 3: 2 2 1 529 ~d\" Clinton i\"!f70 Ji~ ~I 174 183 199 9 4 3 4 1 74 7 ~I College Station 78 15179 73 ,~~ 51 2 l 1 4 t 289 ~3 Crystal Hill 202 16179 179 Jl,~186 l .1 .. 1 .3 749 ! ~ Dupree 137 ) I.1le2\u0026gt;9 so '11 41 3 2 4 3 1 J3 370 l~-5 Fuller Elem. 68 1~4 122 ,~\\1s 2 2 .Jj I 293 ~ Harris 64 ,~, 57 68 ,~1 79 4 3 l ~ 276  SB J'ville Elem. .,o, ~~, 147 l Ir ~ 167 143 126 ~ 4 l 3 2 592 Landmark 1~\n).- ~ ol:\\ I -131 121 109 100 l 4 6 2 I\u0026gt; 15 Lawson ~lo3 ..110 0 138 20 20 281 t4 Oak Grove Elem. li6 3~161 42 40 48 2 1 l 1 431 ~' Oakbrooke 190 ~!56 57 '\" 54 2 2 2 I l 3 l ,, 468 ~ Pine Forest 317.0 q5. ,1 i 208 52 43 7 3 4 3 490 19 Pinewood ~1q J(p\u0026lt; i ,~ 139 140 80 89 3 1 2 4 1 l 460 ~ Robinson Elem. 160 ~ 10\"6 148 43 \"\" 51 l I 403 ~3 (/l 34 ~p 23 0 I Scott 33 27 1171(3 Sherwood 151\n/.~3 132 57 CJ'l 40 1 I 381~ Sylvan Hills Elem. 167 ~f{l 130 59 ,,~ 53 2 1 l 1 41311 Taylor 132 ~129 89 ,5~ 66 l I 417.3'7 Tolleson 188 3.1\\1 159 65 ,~o 55 3 11 5 4 3 1 ~, 494~/ 1,o~~ 3.~~\\ ,i~ TOTAL ELEM. 13,645 3,383 1,864 1,757 55 47 23 33 17 B 10,832~3 NOV-21-F9R7I 1 0:1 3 AM PULASCKOSI CHOOLS FAXN O4, 900483 P. 01  '4 ... ,, OCTOBER 1, 1997ENROLLMENT REPORT WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/ P. rsu,Nr AM. IND.' ESKIM) SCHOOL OOYS GIRLS BOYS GTRLS OOYS GIRJ.,:::\n1:!0Y!::i GIRLS BOYS c..\n1RU:i ~ !,'l ~193 13 Fuller Jr. High 282 185 188 4 4 4 l J'ville Jr, High ~~is #01 1! 245 146 161 6 3 4 2 J'ville Middle 233 ..,r, 244 127 ~130 1 2 2 1 1 l J'ville High 353 !~9- ~,\u0026gt;I 17 L. :) 167 147 3 4 6 4 Mills High ~~I ~77 1 215 176 189 2 l 5 l North Pulaski ~ 1 99\n,JJCt92 ,~ 302 114 2 7 2 1 1 l 1,,1 ,~., Northwood ~ 344 fl 73 92 97 4 6 9 3 2 l Oak Grove \u0026lt;J.I ~ioi I 1!\u0026gt; 355 306 99 105 5 1 2 6 1 Rob. Jr, High 180 ~f43 67 ,~lt 69 Rob, High 145 ~is3 79 ,~\"\u0026gt; 43 l 1 ~ l S. Hills Jr. High (P.f\n6L9 ~ 324 282 128 2 ~ l l S. Hills High ~~4 _\n)-II ,, 299 110 101 5 3 2 1 TOTAL SEC, l,,I05 ~-tt5o (~1 3,277 2 828 1,506 l 444 30 39 29 26 5 8 DIST. TOTAL 6,922 6,211 3,370 3,201 85.,- 86....- 52....- ~~9 22 ..... 15.....- - pa (NOTE: Students atter.ding the Alternative Learning Center at Scott are included in the totals of their home school.) ------------- - 2 - q ! TO!'ALI 861 775 I 741 ~ 979 760 821 831 ~ ~ ~ X, 880\" a ol ~'l 459~ 423 871 301 785 oli l 1 q:\ni ~ 20,024 ~~1 I FAXN O.4 900483 P. 01 OCTOBER ('lfff: '3tud1:: ~ ,:,r:i1:1g thio Alt1,:rnc,:1ve Lear, 1:1~:.r C 0 n .. e.:- a_ S.:. 1nc',,d!\" :r. r:e tot ls of '-h.\u0026lt;!ll' :.orr1e s,~t:ci..,.l,) F~XN O,4 900483 P. 02 ij SCHOOL I /--11.lkl'~S 1t----- ! ArnrJlo Drive 't-= I Rr1ker OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :42P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS .. ' ' . FAXN O5. 014900483 DATE: TO: FROM: .,, j ' ... Pulaski County Special School District 925 E. Dixon Road/ P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, AR 72216 501-490-2000 FAX 490-0483 October 22, 1997 Cynthia Howell, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Little Rock Free Press Jacksonville Patriot North Pulaski Leader Sherwood Voice Norlh Little Rock Times Maumelle Monitor Drop Zone Arkansas Times Arkansas State Press KAAK-TV-Channel 4 KATV-TV-Channel 7 KKYK-TV-Channel 22 KLRT-TV~Channel 16 KTHV-TV-Channel 11 KARN Radio KSYG Radio Associated Press J. R. Huie, Arkansas PubHc School Week Jim Burgett, Board of Education Arlyne Cherven, Board of Education Mildred Tatum, Board of Education Mack McAlister, Board of Education Office of Desegregation Monitoring Joy Springer, Walker Law Firm, Joshua lntervenors PACT Ron Standridge, Information Services Specialist 490-2000 NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 (including transmittal page) P. 01/03 OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :43P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS FAXt~ O5. 014900483 P. 02/C3 OCTOBER 1, 199i ENROLLC\"IENT REPORT (10/22/97) SCHOOL \\AJ-ITIE BI.A._'1( HI...Sffi'ITC !:BPN/ P. Th'IA\\D A\"'!.I NY ES\\..u'\"\"-0 8JtS GIH\"B EIJx'S GIRT:.S 8JYS GL.\nLS ID1S GIRLS , .3JyS C-JRS R,T\nl.L ii ll Adkins 88 76 70 4i 1 l 283 :1 Arnold Drive 139 159 41 44 2 5 1 391 I Baker ' 124 126 35 30 1 316 '. Bates I 111 88 J.31 132 2 2 4 6 6 I I Bayou Meta 289 296 7 9 6 3 1 2 l 614 1 Cato 211 195 62 54 :, 3 2 2 529 II Clinton 174 170 183 199 9 4 3 4 l 74 7 I! .\\ College Station 78 79 73 51 2 l 1 4 289 ii Crystal Hill 201 179 179 186 l l 1 748 :i Dupree 137 129 50 41 3 2 4 3 l 3 70 1! Fuller Elem. 68 83 122 115 2 2 3 0 ~ Iii  ,t. ,1 I Harris 641 57 68 79 4 3 l ? - - 11 - IO :I J'ville Elem. I 11 147 160 142 126 l 4 l 3 2 1 s s 7 !I I ,, I I ,I Lar.dmark 131 121 109 100 j_ 462 Ii I Lawson 138 103 20 20 I I 2 s 1 Ii Oak Grove Elem. 11 176 161 42 48 2 1 1 431 i! Oakbrooke 190 156 57 54 2 2 2 l 3 1 466 ii Ptne Forest 208 170 52 43 7 3 4 3 490 !I i' Pinewood 139 140 80 89 3 l 2 4 l l 4 60 il I Robinson Elem. 160 148 43 51 l 403 II Scott ,, 33 34 27 23 117 11 Sherwood l. 51 132 57 40, 1 I 381 Sylvan Hills Elem. 167 130 59 :-)~\" .11 2 l l 413 I Taylor I 132 129 88 66 1 416 Tolleson 188 159 65 55 3 11 5 4 3 1 494 TOTAL ELEM. 3,644 3,380 1,862 1,753 55 47 23 33 l7 8 10,824 OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :44P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS FAXN O5. 014900483 P. 03/03 OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLLMENT REPORT w\"HITE BLACK HISPA:.JIC 1\\SIAN/ P. ISLANT' AM. IND. / ESKIMO..,_ SCHOOL .t:'OYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLti tlOY~ GIRLS EOYS I GlRLti Fuller Jr. High 282 185 186 193 4 4 4 1 J'ville Jr. High 245 208 146 161 6 3 4 2 J'vifle Middle 230 244 123 130 2 2 l l 1 J'ville High 350 291 167 147 3 4 6 4 Mills High 215 176  188 177 2 1 5 l ~Jorth Pulaski 301 299 114 92 2 7 2 l 1 1 Northwood 346 276 90 97 4 6 9 3 2 l Oak Grove 355 306 99 105 5 1 2 6 l Rob. Jr. High _180 140 66 69 Rob. High 144 153 78 43 1 l 1 S. Hills Jr. High 323 283 128 129 2 4 1 1 I S. Hills High 299 264 llO 101 5 3 2 l TOTAL SEC. 3,272 2,825 1,495 1,444 30 39 29 26 5 8 DIST. TOTAL 6,916 6,205 3,357 3,199 85 86 52 30 22 16 (NOTE: Students attending the Alternative Learning Center at Scott are included in the totals of their home school.) - 2 - TOfAL 859 775 734 97? 765 820 834 880 455 421 873 785 C'l\n7\u0026lt; 19,997  ( ,,\u0026gt;.. ..,.- ,, ,_ LEJ\\,tt +----- -+ Enrull Fl.If- IL_ H-IRC!LLMENT f:.'l SCl--10iJL i=\"Of\n:ti - SCHUCiL CHO ICE DY CHG ICE -- ADE FormU Fin 09-00-(HO R/5'2 Law 20 - U_s_ C 1221F-l US DepRrtment a~ Educ~tion F APD6 FU92 +- --------- --- ----- --- ------------ ----------------------------------------------+NUMB ER iASIAN/P(,C. 1Ai1 !NOIAr~ i of' i iHSFi,rHC ! ifISr-'/1i\\ilC j HISPANIC [ ISLANDER l1-iLASr\":lir~ !CLASSES I. - -- ------------- ---------------------------------------------- f----- i Bogs fGir}s18 oysJAirl519o y s i Gi r} ~ I Bo~ Si Gi r] S l Boys f Girl~ f t --- ------- ---- ---- ------- ---- ---- ---------- -----------------------+---- - ---- ----- --------------- - ----+ r ., L I ANMUAI. SC:IIOOL REPOHT :! ,~ LEl\\11 : 60030GIQ - P\\Jf' IL ENHDLLMFNT n-: ~.c, ICJOL nmM   Uc tn h Pr 1, - SCIIUUL CHOICE: IJY CHOICE - J?97 LD = g . Count'l : PUU\\SIU .~ j~ 'f Scltool . PIIU\\SlO COUNTY :,-~rade Sp\n,n ... __ _ ___ _ __\n I li- 1 Iv: Ii \u0026lt;  :1- fl dtr-1l o/--  j, _ _  .-1'1DE :orrnlL Fi.n_ 09_-00=010.JU.92- ____ _ La~ 20 - U.S. C 122lE-l ---------- -----------. - ----- IJS Department of E\u0026lt;.lu~\n,tion _FAP06 R/9\nl ___ __ ___ -- _ --- ., -- - - - -- -- ---- --- ------- ----- - ---- ---- -- ----- -- ---- - -----+NUMBER I l~HITE NOT I IlLACI\\ NOT I ___ , .i-ll SPA~HC i  .Hl~PAr~rc_ I ill SPAN [:.,_..J i.SLAl~DER... JI\\LASKAN--I..CL..SSES- - - ------7-- --- ---- Grade + ------------------------------------------------------ -+-- -- Tot~ l IBo~srGirlslBoyslGiris!Do~slGarlslfio~slGirlslBu~slGirlsl IASiAN/PAC. JAM INDIAN I oF - _+-._ -+ ___ t--------------- ------. --- . -- - - - - -. ----- ---=c. - -- - -=-,.. --=--- --------------------- i=:nrol l. ii-I 181 I ol 41 4! JI l I l I I I 1 +----+ 1--------------------------------- - ci :z: :x: \u0026lt;I: LL. en .....I 0 C) C=\u0026gt; en C) \u0026lt;..:\u0026gt; :::,.c: en \u0026lt;I: .....I ::::\u0026gt; 0.... :E: 0.... (Y) \"1\" ,..., = 0:: LL. rcn I -i ....- ~ 0J I \u0026gt; C) :z: 0 -  - f\nUtUDL t:flU IC 1-: HV c,1u1c1=: -  I.EAi! oouao,e ~ f,Vl:.' f o,mft r i\" or1-ou () 10 fl/92 a, Countu L.aw 20 - U.5.C J?21F-1 == ~ I S~hool us Dep\u0026lt;1rtment r,f E:dut:,.tion .-, tirade Sp\n,n ._(!Q.,, FAf'D6 IU92 I- . :::_I - CL J. +------------------------------------------------------+NUMBER I I WHITE NOTI 0LACI~ NOTI f ASl\n\\N/f'AC. 1AM INDIAN I Df : I IIISPANIC I HISP/\\NlC I 1-!lSF'hNlC ' . ISLANDER IALASl'.AN lCLASSES Gr\n,de -+--------------------------------------------------------+---- ~ Total 1Boys1Girls1Bo~~Girls1Bo~s1Gi~1sl0o~~Girlsi0a~sGirlsl -  Pre-~i~di,r!la-rten Enrol l ...+,.- - --+ +---- ---- -- - -- -- ------ -- ----- ----- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- --+- -- - 721 ! 12t 21 I In 2.9_1 11 I I I I 1 I 4. 0 \"' +----+ 1------------------- ---------- ------ -------- e-\n-, ,. ' - 9'?,\n1\nY \u0026lt;:0 == e'' 1 == I CD = ci I :z: -- :x: \u0026lt;J: 4 LL. t  U) --l C\u0026gt; C\u0026gt; 4 :r C\u0026gt; U) C\u0026gt; t C\u0026gt; -~ { U) \u0026lt;J: --l - :=, CL (. -- ::c o.. (i N =-- \u0026lt;=:0  -n::: LL.  r--- CD I -  N I \u0026gt; 0 :z:  ( -- -- -- -- - - --  ./ LEA# flN~IUAL SCHOOL RE.PORT 6003002 PU~JL ENttOLLMENT UY SCHOUL tUNM - Uc~ubP1 1, ,~,. SCHOIJL CHOICE Il\"\u0026gt;' CHOICE - AOE Formtt Fin 09-00-010 R/92 0.:? -\n-~-_\n:~cc\n:..~:..n:..:o...c!c..1'--'------~~-.+-E\u0026lt;E+-+--4-~+-+-----------\"\"~'-'::..:w:..D......=c\nc::'-a-~-t\"\"'~'-'-~!/ o !~ ~! ~~--c-\"!-,-=:o-t:---n. -------------------------------------1  , Grade Span FAPD6 R /9-\n:!. +------------------------------------ ________ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_+_~~IU~M.B~~E=R~--------------------I I ~J~UTE NOi I ULhCI-'. NOTI I ASIAN/PAC. IA~l INOJAN I o~   I HISPANIC I HISPANIC I HISPANIC I ISLANDEH I ALASI-IAN JCLA5SES qr.a cJe --- ------ - -- ------~----- -------------_-_--:-:,..-,..-----=-----_----_,.-._.--__--_-+__-_ -_--------------------------l Total IOoyslGirlslOn~s1Glrlslllo~slCirl~IDo~s1Girls1BoyslGirlsl +---+ +------ --- ------ ----------- --------------~-------------+--- P_r~e---\"~i_n_d_e_r-~g~a..= _nr~ t__ E_n~r_D_l~l-_1 5~3~1 1_ _ 1_2~1_ _ t 2 I 11 I 17 i 1 I +----I-- 1 - -- -- -------------------- ---- --- ----------- -------------- ---\" :\n,~\ni I ----------- -------------\u0026lt; .. cry co == == = c:5 :z: :x: \u0026lt;C LL U) -.I 0 0 = 0 U) 0 0 ::,c U) \u0026lt;C -.I = 0... :.:= 0... = cry = a:: LL r-= I N I \u0026gt; 0 :z:   6003012 Count Sctiool Grade Span ~  ,, 1 L L,.1\\.1.JLL.J 1L1.J ~ U , :Jt.HUUI_ ! UHM - Uc t ob e 1 l ~ 199 / SCHOOL CHOICE IlY CHOlCE - Ant: Forn,rt Fin 09-00-010 R/92 LdU! 20 - U S. C l2~I:-1 US Oepart.ment of Edu~c~a:-:\nt-,~.o-=-n------------------------------------FAPD6 R/92 +--- _________________________________ ---------------+~~u_MBER ____ _ H-------------------------,:--1:--:~7-cHITE NUfl l.lLACI'. NflTJ IASIAN/PAC. 1AM IN0II\\N I of ------------- 1 HIGPANIC I HISf'ANlt. I HI~,PANIC I IGLI\\N0ER IALASJ.\u0026lt;.AN !CLASSES \" ~ ,, ,\", ,. ,, :...., ,, i)  \" ~r: ., Grade Total +----+ +-. --------- - ---- ------------------ -- ------------------+---- 19o ~~I G i Pl 1B ay I Girls I Doy s I Girls! Boy ~s~l~C~li~-,s-~. ,~O~u-~~-.~~--or~~l-.s~~I--------------------------~ -~- --- ---- --- --- ---- --- -- ---------- - -- --- ---- ----- ---- -- --+- -- - Pre-Ki!_!! erg a r_t_.,_n_ _ E_n_r_o_l_l_*___f 3 _6 _1___ _.'.!J_ __ 7_1_ _! 3 r l 2 I I I_ ___ I _ 1 __ r 2. _ g__ ________ _ I------------ --- ---- --- ------ - -------- ---- ------ - - 1\\ a~ o K Gt Gr Gr Gr. = 0.. -.:::I\" (Y) = ~ LL. r-- CD I ~ I \u0026gt; 0 :z: /\\NtJUIIL SCHOOL HEPDRT LEA# Count!J 6003028 School Grade Span PUP l L ENflfJLLMFN ,- ltY SCI IOUL. ruHM - Oct nt, i.1 l, l 'I'} T rn:HCJDL CHOfCE UY CHOICC - ADE form Fin 09-00-010 R/92 Law 20 - U.S. C 1221-l US Department of Education FAPD6 l\u0026lt;/92 \"-4----------------1------------+_-_-_-_-_----------------------------------------------- ----+NUMUER I ~!HITE NTI DLACI', N  l l H1'.\nIAN/PAC. 11\"\\M INDI,,N I ~F-----------------------1 1 HISPANIC I HISPANIC J HISPANIC I ISLANDER !ALASKAN !CLASSES Grade +-----------------------------------------------:::--------,...-::-:-----:---_+:_-_-_-_- ____________________ ---Total IBoyslGirls!Oo~slGirlslOoyslGirlslBoyslGirlslDouslGirlsl +-- -- + +- --- ----- -------- - -- --- ------ ---- --- ---- - ----- - - -- -- --~---- ,...._. __ P_r~e~-_~\" Kn d erg a r_t,,__:.e.::_lc .. ...cE=-n:..:.:..r-=o:...:)____,1_, :_r_,.\n___,.:...r.~:.'-1-'4-'--''l7'-~--1\"\".-.2,_0Il 71 10 I I I l t I I 4. 0  ... ,. .., \" - G G1 H., Pe lax II +------.. r ----------------- --- -------- ------------------------------+ Cho\nrP-lHf 1 ~~ i7 6 - \u0026gt;1.7. DnJ/ 1/ 97 ~~~bs ~ 7671 Co. Phone~ -r 0 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 925 EAST DlxoN ROAD LrITLER OCKA, RKANSAS 72206 (501) 490-2000 Date: Time: To: .. From: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): ---=2r---~--- Message \\. Posr OmCE Box 8601 Lmu: ROCK, AR.KANSAS 72216 FAX (501) 490-0483 -D.E . C.-.0 3-W97E 0D2 :47P M PULASCKOIS CHOOLS FAXN O.4 900483 P. 02 SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 1 a, 1 997 HIGH SCHOOL Jacksonville Mills North Pulaski Oak Grove Jr-./Sr. Robinson Sylvan Hills JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL\u0026amp; Fuller . Jackso-nville North Jacksonvme South Northwood Robinson (.2-rooms devlded) Scott (Alternative Sch.) Sylvan Hills .EI..EMENTARV SCHOOL Adkins Arnold Drive Baker Bates Bayou Meto Cato Clinton College Station Crystal Hill Dupree Fuller Harris Jacksonville Landmark Lawson Oak Grove Oakbrooke Pine Forest Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan HIiis Murrell Taylor Tolleson SCHOOL CAPACITY 1025 '780 900 93S 506 998 ~.OOL CAPACITY 945 BOO BOO 964 486 12S 925 SCHOOL CAPACl'l'V 370 420 330 768 660 576 833 340 820 465 526 S25 785 SGS 325 476 500 5S6 523 450 280 460 456 4S0 S70 PCSSD Ten Year Enrollment Comparison School 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 -White- 611 607 669 621 598 518 329 331 310 297 - - ~ - - - Other 10 8 8 7 10 5 4 11 4 ~ - - - - - - Total 736 755 802 755 735 685 424 444 422 413 f- - - % Blk 17 18 16 17 18 23 21 25 24 27 I Taylor Elem Black 112 107 ~13] 112 108 122 141 149 165 115 -- - - White 329 346 337 306 308 264 266 270 230 261 - - - -- - -- - ---- -- Other 2 I 5 4 2 2 I 2 I - - -- -- Total 441 455 468 423 420 388 409 420 397 417 t--- - ,...... c- - % Blk 25 24 28 26 26 31 34 35 42 37 Tolleson Elem Black 84 83 126 137 136 127 124 I 15 128 120 - - -- White - 457 442 426 418 425 405 374 429 402 347 - - - - - Other 27 - 14 111- 8 0 I 0 0 27 -- - - - Total 541 552 - 566 566 569 532 499 544 530 494 - - -f- - % Blk 16 15 22 24 24 24 25 21 24 24 Suh Total - Elem Black 3,231 3,201 3,134 3,111 3,471 3,436 3,642 3,726 3,693 3,621 White J - -- 9,022 8,729. 8,774 8,679 8,824 7,992 7,752 7,715 7,443 7,028 + Other 125 92 89 115 75 147 121 141 183 Total 12,253 12,055 ___g,_o1o1,:8~7 9 r 12,410t 11,503 __! 1,541 11,562 11,277 t - t---- 10,832 $ Blk 26 27 26 26 28 30 32 32 33 33 Alternative - Sec. Black I l 16 17 16 16 22 21 -,_ -- t f----- Oponod for 1992-93 school White - 50 48 39 31 26- 27 yoar. f Other I - 0 0 0 0 I 0 661 - Total 65 *55 *47 *49 48 + % Blk 24 26 29 34 45 44 Fuller Jr. Black 375 398t 404 411 4251 410 424 ~~t 384 381 (includes a specialty t White 452 t 462 428 440 497 j 485 446 467 program) Other 5 5 12 13 9 13 - 13 Total 827 865 837 863 935 9 918 883 843 861 ' - % Blk 45 46 48 48 45 43 46 49 46 44 I Jacksonville Jr. North Black 128 142j 181 172 184 182 j 195 201 244 t 257 Re-organized h.:ginning White 439 463 534 444 458 401 414 434 399 477 with 1997-98: became a middk school: indudcd Other 10 15 10 12 II IO 0 10 7 grades 6-8. Total 567t 6151 730 626 j 654 594 619 635 t 653 i 741 t - % Blk 23 23 25 27 28 31 32 32 37 35 Jacksonville Jr. South Black 174 166 156 180 202 202 186 181 I 200 f 307 ' 1 White 486 444 420 403 381 355 338 323 318 453 Other 10-'-- 10 1 17 19 9 10 8 11 1 15 --- I rl //,-r .e\nJ., ('::\u0026gt; y (:J,v .:fl/~- p37- /~/~ ('.t\u0026gt;,,J I\"- 0 --%~\n ~l(\u0026lt;:.-f 77-01 LITTLE ROCK District LEA Number FAPD NO. 38 1.9.9h.91!. SCHOOL YEAR 10/23/97 Qrtr Ending Date 11/21/97 Date Submitted ~Q=r=t=r-\\=umb=-e-r~_REC~~~a~dent M. to M TRANSFERS SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE. REPORT, K12 ADT - ADA - ADM SEP 11 1998 TELEPHONE NUMBER_324::2.QQ0_ OFFIOCFE DESEGREMGOANTIIOTOHR J!m This report is due within fiftren (15) days after the end of each quarter (Ark.Code Ann. 6-18-213). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services, #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and o-e copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than 40 and no more than 50 days. I  1 ~jg.( n columns 2 thcu 14 should Days ~ to me nearest whole number in Qrtr C. Resident pupils sent t9 :Jther district(s) under .\"M to 1'l\" transfers List District s LEO.# North Little Rock Pulaski County Special Pulaski County Special P-4 D. Total C of columns 12, 3, 14. These ! ,. I *T 3,810 2,673 will be used for State Ecualization Aid purposes 7. E. Non-Resident pupils rec::ived from other district(s) under \"M to for' transfers List District/sl ~ North Little Rock I 45 j Pulaski County Special I 45 i \nPulaski County Special P-4 I 45 ! H. Number of kindergarten pupls enrolled this quarter' I I I 1 I A I .:\nI KINDEiRGART~N I f\"\\e:i- in/\\ Days I 10Absent I Total Total *NT Col 2+3 T+NT 3,810 168 2,673 98 90 I 90 I 7 I 1,524 1 1,524 I 62 I 1,625 I 1,625 I 95 I Full-Time.~4~_4_ _ f\nI 7 I 0 I n 1t\\ I 11 I p i n I ,a I GRADES 1 -12 COMBl['JED TOTAL ADM Days in Attendance Days GRADES K-12 Total l *I\\IT_-, 7otal Absent Total ADT ADA I ADM Col 4+5 Columns Total Col 9+10 Col 2+7 Col 4+9 Col 4+5+ ..: Col 1 *T 7+8 T+NT .o Col,1 .oCol 1 .oCol 1 9+10...:Col 1 I I I 4,009 I 4,009 278 I 100 93 1 100 88 I~ -4Maa-! ~, 1\n'!M- ...,440---1 ..1.-=- 62 I I I tit/IC./ l/81CI ,Z//0 /117 . //.55 2 I I 1,612 I 1,612 ! 111 I 38\ni 38 I 40 35 I I 15,751 I 15,751 i 633 I 364 ! 384 I 399 38 I I I i I I I Half-time _____ _ Additional instructions on back FIN-09-00-005 5/91 SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 1 a, 1 997 HIGH SCHOOL Jacksonville Mills North Pulaski Oak Grove Jr./Sr. Robinson Sylvan Hills JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Fuller Jacksonville North Jacksonville South Northwood Robinson (2-rooms devlded) Scott (Alternative Sch.) Sylvan Hills ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Adkins Arnold Drive Baker Bates Bayou Melo Cato Clinton College Station Crystal Hill Dupree Fuller Harris Jacksonville Landmark Lawson Oak Grove Oakbrooke Pine Forest Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan Hills Murrell Taylor Tolleson SCHOOL CAPACITY 1025 780 900 935 506 998 SCHOOL CAPACITY 945 800 800 964 486 125 925 SCHOOL CAPACITY 370 420 330 768 660 576 833 340 820 465 526 525 785 568 325 476 500 556 523 450 280 460 456 450 570\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1166","title":"Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1997-07-10/1997-12-18"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School board members","School boards","School management and organization","Meetings"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1166"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["184 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING July 10, 1997 AUG 2 ~ 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting immediately following the regular agenda meeting on Thursday, July 10, 1997, in the Board Room of the administration building at 810 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. John Riggs, President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Riggs, IV Micheal Daugherty Larry Berkley Pat Gee Judy Magness Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Designee Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes Colleen Kidda, Teacher Ex officio, ALC Tiffany Mays, Student Ex officio, Central High I. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Riggs called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. A quorum was stipulated without a roll call\nall members of the Board were present. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING July 10, 1997 Page2 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting contained the following action items: I. Proposed Budget for Annual School Election II. Superintendent's Contract ACTION AGENDA In compliance with Arkansas law, (Ark. Code Ann 6-13-622) the Board of Directors is required to approve a proposed budget for the 1998-99 school year, and a tax rate levy sufficient to provide such funding. This must be published not less than 60 days prior to the annual school election. The proposed budget was prepared by Mr. Milhollen and administration recommended approval. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the proposed budget, Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mr. Berkley moved for the Board to convene an executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel issue. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. The Board returned from executive session at 6:10 p.m. and reported that no action had been taken. SUPERINTENDENT'S CONTRACT Mr. Berkley made a motion to extend Dr. Roberts' current contract to December 31, 1997. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Ms. Strickland made a motion to offer a contract to Dr. Les Carnine for the position of superintendent of schools. Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Immediately following adjournment, Dr. Carnine and Board members signed the contract. APPROVED: '7 -.\n2LJ-Cf'7 I\u0026lt;, ~ ~ Micheal Daughe ~ ecretaryC PROPOSED BUDGET OF EXPENDITURES TOGETHER WITH TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998, TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 30, 1999 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District No. 60-01 of Pulaski County, Arkansas in compliance with the requirements of Amendments No. 40 and No. 74 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas and of Arkansas Code Ann.  6-13-622 (1993 Rep!.), has prepared, approved, and hereby makes public the proposed budget of expenditures together with a supporting tax rate as follows: 1. Salary Fund Expenditures $ 64,331,159.00 RECEIVED 2. Instructional Expense $ 19,533,734.00 3. Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation Expense $ 11,162,134.00 4. Pupil Transportation Expense $ 10,464,500.00 AUG 2 s 1997 5. Other Operating Expense $ 26,847,025.00 6. Nonbonded Debt Payment $ 360,676.00 OFFICE OF 7. Bonded Debt Payment $ 6,827,445.00 DESEGREGATION MONITORING 8. Building Fund Expense $ .00 9. Dedicated Maintenance \u0026amp; Operation $ .00 To provide for the foregoing proposed budget of expenditures the Board of Directors proposes a total school tax rate (state and local) of 41.40 mills on the dollar of the assessed value of taxable property located in this School District. The proposed tax includes the uniform rate of 25.00 mills (the \"Statewide Uniform Rate\") to be collected on all taxable property in the State and remitted to the State Treasurer pursuant to Amendment No. 74 to the Arkansas Constitution to be used solely for maintenance and operation of schools in the State. As provided in Amendment No. 74, the Statewide Uniform Rate replaces a portion of the existing rate of tax levied by this School District and available for maintenance and operation of schools in this District. The existing rate of tax levied by this School District is 41.40 mills composed of 32.00 mills specifically voted for maintenance and operation and 9.40 mills voted for debt service previously voted as a continuing levy pledged for the retirement of existing indebtedness. The surplus revenues produced each year by debt service millage may be used by the District for other school purposes. In accordance with the provisions of Amendment No. 59 to the Arkansas Constitution and Act No. 848 of 1981, the proposed tax levy applies to real property ( exclusive of real property owned by public utilities and regulated carriers). The tax rate applicable to personal property and to all property (real and personal) owned by public utilities and regulated carriers will be the rate computed in accordance with the provisions of Amendment No. 59 and Act No. 848. - The total proposed school tax levy of 41 .40 mills represents no increase over the current tax rate. Given this 10th day of July, 1997. Little Rock School District No. 60-01 of Pulaski County J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, July 24, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. The Vice President, Judy Magness, presided. A brief budget work session was conducted prior to the call to order of the regular meeting. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Michael Daugherty Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland RECEn,~o SEP\n1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Berkley John Riggs, IV ALSO PRESENT: Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. Board Vice President, Judy Magness, called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. Five members of the Board were present\nMr. Berkley and Mr. Riggs were absent. Tiffany Mays, Central High School student ex officio, was also present. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of June 26, and a special meeting conducted on July 10, were presented for the Board's approval. Dr. Daugherty moved to approve the minutes, Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page2 III. PRESENTATIONS: A. SUPERINTENDENT The Superintendent presented citations to Central High School teachers who participated in a Goals 2000 grant staff development project, directed by Dr. Brenda James. The following teachers were present to accept their citation: Paulette Blevins, Tandy Cobb, Melissa Donham, Marion Easter, Kathy Gates, Gracie Mays, Dorothy McDonald, Angel Nash, Ellen Teeter, and Barbara Wilder. Other teachers who completed the training include: Beverly Broadnax-Thrasher, Sandy Deitz, Sarah Dixon, Karen Hammons, Gwen Hardin, Gary Hufford, Melinda Kalb, Doris Nash, Carolyn Pittman, Julia Post, Marilyn Rutledge, Annice Steadman, Flora Thompson, and Christopher Threatt. In addition, Linda Watson, Lloyd Sain, David Spillers, and Frank James were recognized for serving as consultants on the project. Dr. Roberts presented plaques to Rett Tucker and Baker Kurrus in recognition of the leadership roles they have assumed during the past year. Mr. Tucker serves as the president of the Central High Museum project and co-chairs the 40th anniversary recognition ceremonies. He also serves on the board of the Little Rock Alliance for Our Public Schools. Mr. Kurrus serves as president of the Alliance board and volunteers on several LRSD committees, including the strategic planning committee and the student assignment work team. Tiffany Mays who recently graduated from Central High School served as the student ex officio representative on the Board for the month of July and was presented with a citation for her service. C. CITIZENS COMMITTEES TRUCE Program Presentation - Little Rock Rotary Club Mr. John Ostner provided a brief report on the success of the TRUCE (Teens Resisting Unhealthy Choices Everyday) Program. The Board was given copies of the membership figures for the 1996-97 school year and a list of participating business sponsors. He asked for the Board's endorsement to expand the program to include junior high school students in theLRSD. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page 3 D. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Office of Desegregation Monitoring Melissa Gulden reported on ODM participation in the Vital Link program this summer. Several businesses in the Heritage West building participated in Vital Link and all of them reported having positive and successful experiences. She expressed appreciation to Debbie Milam and Deana Keithley for their assistance in coordinating the Vital Link activities. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter, newly elected president of the CTA, introduced himself and expressed confidence that efforts to establish a more positive working relationship between the teachers' union and the District administration would be successful. 3. Joshua Intervenors Joy Springer noted concerns regarding the student rights \u0026amp; responsibilities handbook revisions, specifically the proposed changes to the due process section. Dr. Roberts asked the Board to table action on the handbook until the committee could work through some of the concerns and questions that still exist in the revisions. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PT A Council No report. E. BOARD MEMBERS Dr. Daugherty presented a brochure from the Office of Emergency Services and asked the public to be aware of requirements to have addresses clearly visible on the outside of homes. He also remarked that his son will be attending Pulaski Heights Jr. High School next year. Ms. Gee commented on the response to a question she had asked in the budget meeting prior to the regular meeting: the recently negotiated pay increases for teachers would also be granted to other employees in the District. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page4 Ms. Magness attended a reception at the Student Employability Center that operated this summer as a part of the state Employment Security Division office. The center is run by students who provide training for other students in employability skills, i.e. how to fill out applications, how to dress appropriately for an interview, how to respond to interview questions, etc. The Center is funded by grants from the City of Little Rock and the New Futures Initiative. Ms. Magness also thanked the Southwestern Bell Pioneers service organization for painting maps of the United States on school playgrounds. She and Mr. Berkley had visited Rightsell School this week while the volunteers were working on the map. IV. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS None. V. ACTION AGENDA A. Common Ground Proposal Franklin Elementary School submitted a proposal in the amount of $42,000 to the Common Ground Program for a project to improve academic performance and citizenship of students through a wide range of behavior management activities. The Board was asked for authorization to maintain the grant submission. Dr. Daugherty moved to approve the submission, Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. B. Resolution: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System Picked Up Contributions and Purchased Service The Board was asked to approve a resolution authorizing the District to participate in the \"picked-up\" contributions program. Employees who are active Arkansas Teacher Retirement System members may opt to have their retirement deductions made from taxable income prior to federal and state income tax deductions. This option will allow members to take home more of their wages. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the resolution, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. C. ESEA, Title 1, 1997-98 District Plan The Board was asked to authorize submission of the 1997-98 ESEA, Title I District plan. The funding allocation is $4,202,821 based on 11,081 eligible students. Ms. Gee made a motion to approve the submission. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page 5 D. ESEA, Title VI, 1997-98 Application The Board was asked to authorize submission of the 1997-98 Title VI application to the Arkansas Department of Education. The funding allocation, in the amount of $135,197, is based on enrollment of eligible public and private school students in the LRSD. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the submission. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. E. Technology Literacy Challenge Grant A technology Literacy Challenge Grant application was submitted to the Arkansas Department of Education on the deadline date, July 15. The Board was asked to approve maintaining the submission. The proposal seeks $94,000 for a one-year initiative\ncontinuation funding is expected to be made available over a 5 year period. No matching fund commitment is required. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the grant submission. Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. F. Implementation of Registered Volunteers Program (Act 1012 of 1997) Act 1012 of 1997 allows local school districts to establish registered volunteer programs to provide additional personnel to supervise extracurricular or interscholastic activities under the direction of a certified staff member. The Board was asked to approve the formation of a registered volunteers program in the LRSD for the 1997-98 school year, with initial costs for background checks and training to be paid from the secondary school budget. Dr. Victor Anderson responded to questions from the Board. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the implementation of Act 1012, registered volunteers program. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. G. Second Jleading: Appropriate Use of Computer Networks Policy Act 801 of the 1997 Legislative Session requires the Board of Directors to adopt a policy concerning student and staff use of District-owned computers in accessing the Internet. The law also requires the policy be incorporated into the written student discipline policy if there is punishment for students who misuse District-owned computers. The policy was passed on first reading at the regular meeting in June with an amendment to include \"normal district progressive disciplinary sanctions\" in the policy statement. Dr. Daugherty  moved to approve the policy on second reading. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page6 H. Second Reading: Strategy Five Policy Proposals Members of Strategic Planning Team 5 met monthly to facilitate implementation of the community partnership portions of the strategic plan. This group drafted three proposed policies, Partners in Education, School-based Mentoring Programs, and Relations with Community Organizations, which were approved on first reading at the regular meeting in June. Ms. Strickland made a motion to approve these three policies on second reading. Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. I. Approval of Student Rights \u0026amp; Responsibilities Handbook Action on approval of the student rights \u0026amp; responsibilities handbook was tabled by consensus. It will be included as an action item in August. J. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Dr. Daugherty. The motion carried unanimously. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR J. A. Fair High Apple Computer/printer Dr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Aubrey Hough for Science Dept. Instructional Technology Star NX-1000 Printer Mr. W. J. Fitzhugh K Personnel Changes The Superintendent requested the Board's approval of personnel items printed in the agenda. Ms. Strickland moved to accept the recommendations, Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. L. Financial Reports Financial reports were provided prior to the regular meeting during the budget work session. Mark Milhollen was present to respond to questions. Dr. Daugherty moved to accept the reports. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING July 24, 1997 Page 7 VI. REPORT AGENDA A. Budget Update All budget information was presented in the work session prior to the regular meeting. B. Discussion: Progress Report on Annual Goals The Board briefly reviewed the annual goals, but did not take any action. Dr. Roberts reported that the work teams will be asked to present their reports to the Board at special meetings scheduled on August 14 and 18. Dr. Roberts will then present his recommendations from the work team reports at a special meeting on August 25. The Board will then be given an opportunity to review the recommendations before taking action in September. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS - None. VIII. DISCIPLINARY None. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Board, Ms. Strickland moved for adjournment at 7:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Dr. Daugherty, and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: 8'  d---'g -'i '(  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 5, 1997 RECEnfED SEP 4 1997 OFFICE Of DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Tuesday, August 5, 1997, in the superintendent's office of the administration building at 810 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Judy Magness, Vice President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: John Riggs, IV Micheal Daugherty ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Magness called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Five members of the Board were present, Mr. Riggs and Dr. Daugherty were absent. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The special meeting was called for the purpose of adopting a resolution requesting the Pulaski County Board of Election Commissioners to reduce the number of polling places for the Little Rock School District annual school election, scheduled for September 16, 1997. .. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 5, 1997 Page2 ACTION AGENDA In compliance with Arkansas law, (Act 545 of 1997) the Board of Directors was asked to approve a resolution petitioning the Pulaski County Election Commission to reduce the number of polling places in the September school elections. By doing so, the District anticipates saving approximately $20,000 in election costs. A copy of the resolution which further explains the law and the requirements is attached to these minutes. Ms. Gee made a motion to adopt the resolution. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m. on a motion by Ms. Gee, seconded by Ms. Strickland. APPROVED: $-Jz-q1 Resolution 1997 School Board Elections WHEREAS, Act 545 of 1997 passed by the Arkansas General Assembly amends Arkansas Code Annotated 6-14-102, related to school board elections\nand WHEREAS, Act 545 states that \"In any election year, if no more than one (1) candidate for school district director or member of the county board of education presents a petition or notice in writing to the county board of election commissioners as required by 6-14- 111, and there are no other ballot issues to be submitted to district electors for consideration, the board of directors of any school district may, by resolution duly adopted, request the county board of election commissioners to reduce the number of polling places\"\nand WHEREAS, only one candidate has filed a petition in each of the three school election districts which are up for election this year, and there are no other ballot issues\nNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District of Pulaski County adopts this resolution to request the county board of election commissioners to reduce the number of polling places. Secretary Adopted LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 14, 1997 RC 1997 OFRCEOF REGAT/DN MONITOR/~ The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, August 14, 1997, immediately following the regular agenda meeting, at the administration building at 810 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Judy Magness, Vice President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: John Riggs, IV ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Magness called the meeting to order at 5:40 p.m. Six members of the Board were present\nMr. Riggs was absent. Kamie Smith, 11 th grade student ex officio from Fair High School, and Ann McLennan, 2nd grade teacher ex officio from Badgett Elementary School were also present. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 14, 1997 Page2 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting listed the following items: I. Ratification of Personnel Contracts II. Student Reinstatement Petitions ill. Work Team Reports ACTION AGENDA Ratification of Personnel Contracts Brady Gadberry provided a brief summary of the personnel agreements and asked for the Board to approve the negotiated contracts. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the contracts, Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0. Student Reinstatement Petitions The Board convened an executive session for the purpose of reviewing student disciplinary reports. Dr. Watson submitted 17 petitions for reinstatement and recommended various placements for the students involved. Dr. Mitchell moved to accept the administration's recommendations and Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. The students and recommended placements for the 1997-98 school year are listed in the chart which follows: PREVIOUS RECOMMENDED STUDENT'S OFFENSE PLACEMENT PLACEMENT NAME Joseph Blue Physical Assault/Staff ALC/JJC Dunbar Jr. High Phillip Chandler' Possession/Weapon ALC/JJC Regular High School Jabari Cummins Inciting to Riot Central Central/Other High School Deon Earnest Inciting to Riot Central Central/Other High School Edmar Higgins Verbal Abuse/Staff Central Sr. HighALC James Hubbard Verbal Abuse/Staff Central Sr. HighALC Shamil\u0026lt;a Hudson Physical Assault/Staff ALC/JJC Jr. HighALC Latricia Logan Possession/Weapon McClellan McClellan Valarie Logan Possession/Weapon Mabelvale Jr. High Jr. High ALC Calvin Love Physical Assault/Staff Central Sr. HighALC Brandi Maclntrush Verbal Assault/Staff ALC Dunbar Jr. High Kevin Morrison Arson Central/Metro Central High Mashieka Murphy Possession/Weapon Fair/JJC Fair Chris Royster Verbal Abuse/Staff Hall Hall Shawnrita Sain Physical Assault/Staff Central Regular High School Louis Shelton Verbal Abuse/Staff Forest Heights Jr. HighALC Jasper Vick Verbal Abuse/Staff Parkview Sr. High School MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 14, 1997 Page 3 WORK TEAM REPORTS: The Curriculum-Reading \u0026amp; Mathematics work team report was presented by team leader, Sharon Davis and committee members, Gene Parker and Dennis Glasgow. The School Revitalization work team report was presented by team leader, Marian Lacey and other committee members, Selma Hobby and Carol Green. The Incentive School work team report was presented by Sadie Mitchell, Margaret Gremillion, Ethel Dunbar, Lillie Scull, Lionel Ward, Sharon Brooks, and Anne Mangan. The Alternative Education \u0026amp; Discipline work team reports were presented by Jo Evelyn Elston, Linda Watson, Everett Hawks, and Lee Ann Byrd. Additional reports will be presented to the Board on August 18, 1997 at 6:00 p.m. Dr. Roberts will present recommendations from these reports to the Board on August 28, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. on a motion by Ms. Gee, seconded by Dr. Daugherty. APPROVED: 2 -\n).. f-9 ( Micheal Daughe ~ .. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 18, 1997 RECEIVE SEP 4 1997 DES OFFICE OF 'EGREGATION MONITOR/NG The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Monday, August 18, 1997, at the administration building at 810 West Markham\nLittle Rock, Arkansas. John Riggs, President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Riggs Judy Magness Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strick.land MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Riggs called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Five members of the Board were present\nMr. Berkley and Dr. Daugherty were absent. Ann McLennan, 2nd grade teacher ex officio from Badgett Elementary School was also present. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING August 18, 1997 Page2 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called for the purpose of hearing the final work team reports. No official board action was taken. WORK TEAM REPORTS: The Classroom-Community Links work team report was presented by team leader, Carol Green, and committee members, Selma Hobby and Julie Rhodes. The Leadership \u0026amp; Staff Development work team report was presented by team leader, Betty Raper, and team members, Robert Robinson, Marion Woods, and Skip Gardner. The Technology work team report was presented by team leader, Lucy Lyon, and committee members, Lillie Carter, Skip Marshall, Rich Kennedy, Paul Smith, and John Ruffins. Patrick Kennedy, Central High School student, also presented a video demonstration. The Student Assignment work team recommendations were presented by team leader, Baker Kurrus. Dr. Roberts will present recommendations from these reports to the Board on August 28, 1997. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 :00 p.m. on a motion by Ms. Gee, seconded by Ms. Strickland. 8 APPROVED: f-J-f-97 Micheal Daughe~ecretary LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 RECF''' SEP 2 6 1997 OFFICE OF IISEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, August 28, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. The President, John Riggs, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Riggs, IV Judy Magness Michael Daugherty Larry Berkley Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Board President, John Riggs, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. II. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of July 24, and special meetings conducted on August 5, August 14, and August 18, were presented for the Board's approval. Mr. Berkley requested a correction to the minutes of July 24. That correction was noted and Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the amended minutes. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried 7-0.  REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page2 III. PRESENTATIONS: A. SUPERINTENDENT The Superintendent presented a citation to Dionne Bennett who was recently selected as the 1997 Sallie Mae First Class Teacher. Ms. Bennett, a science teacher at Mann Magnet Junior High School, received $1,500 cash and a trip to Washington, D.C. Larry Berkley and Micheal Daugherty, school Board members, were recognized by the Arkansas Schools Boards Association for completing fifteen hours of inservice training. Six hours of training per year is required under Act 767 of 1987. B. PARTNERSHIPS Debbie Milam, VIPS Coordinator for the District recognized recently formed partnerships between schools and community businesses. Those partnerships include: Arkansas Youth Symphony Orchestra and Booker Arts Magnet School, represented by Cheryl Simmons-Carson and Lou Alley KLRE Radio Station and Booker Arts Magnet School, represented by Cheryl Simmons-Carson and Lou Alley KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, represented by Charlotte Daniel, Dorsey Jackson and Cathy Reid, partnering with Carver Magnet School, represented by Diane Barksdale and Yana Scott Loomis, Fargo \u0026amp; Company, represented by Mike Teeter, in partnership with Chicot Elementary, represented by Jane Harkey Safety \u0026amp; Environmental Associates, Inc., represented by Keina Jennings, in partnership with Chicot Elementary, represented by Jane Harkey Ms. Magness made a motion to accept the new partnerships. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page3 SUPERINTENDENT'S PRESENTATION: Work Team/Desegregation Recommendations - Dr. Roberts reviewed recommendations contained in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, dated August 28, 1997. He will ask the Board to approve the recommendations included in this report at the regular Board meeting in September. District attorneys will gather comments from all parties to the desegregation lawsuit, and their input will be considered before submitting the document to the court. A copy of the report is attached to these minutes. C. CITIZENS COMMITTEES City Board member Joan Adcock introduced L.O.V.E (Let Our Violence End) program directors, Robert Holt and R. B. Smith. The L.O.V.E. program teaches teamwork and selfesteem and provides jobs and training for young people in an effort to curb violence and gang activity. They made a presentation of their program goals and objectives and asked the Board to consider donating the old Eastside School to the L.O.V.E. program. Students who participated in the presentation included Derrick Almon, Romy Chambliss, and Antoine Perkins. Community member Shirley Marshall also stated support for the program on behalf of the residents near Eastside. The Board recessed at 7:35 and reconvened at 7:55 p.m. Dr. Daugherty did not return from recess. D. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Office of Desegregation Monitoring No report. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter reported that CT A representatives and members were pleased with the negotiations process this year, especially with the fact that all groups were under three-year contract agreements. Two items especially popular with the membership were the direct deposit of paychecks, and technology training for teachers. 3. Joshua Intervenors No report. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page4 IV. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PT A Council No report. E. BOARD MEMBERS Mr. Riggs expressed personal pleasure in the fact that school is back in session and that it seemed to be a smooth opening with the exception of a few transportation problems. He congratulated Ms. Magness, Ms. Gee and Ms. Strickland who were unopposed for positions on the Board. Each of these Board members will serve three more years on the Board and will be sworn in at the September 18 meeting. Mr. Riggs also commented on the impact of the recommendations made in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, which was the basis for Dr. Roberts' presentation earlier in the agenda. The Board's decision to approve these recommendations will impact the children in our city for many years. Mr. Riggs asked the Board to remain prayerful\nto ask for strength, courage and wisdom. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS Sandy Becker representing the Panky Community Improvement Association asked the Board to extend the deadline for the required improvements to property in Panky that was previously deeded by the District. He also thanked the Board for continuing to implement Strategic Plan recommendations, especially those from Action Team 5. Enos Jones asked the Board to consider the current requirements for volunteer coaches. He provided copies of the Arkansas Law and AAA rules which address the issue. Debbie Vail expressed concern regarding transportation problems. Her daughter attends Dunbar Jr. High and has been late several times this school year and last. Terri Watkins also reported problems with late buses. Her son has missed first period classes several times this year, She has reported problems to Laidlaw, but doesn't feel that her problem is being resolved. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page5 Gary Banks and Larry Oberste representing Pepsi Bottling Company, expressed support for Ray Gillespie and the LRSD Athletic Program and proposed establishing a partnership to benefit LRSD students involved in athletic programs. V. ACTION AGENDA A. Student Rights \u0026amp; Responsibilities Handbook The Board had been provided copies of recommended revisions to the current Rights \u0026amp; Responsibilities Handbook. Dr. Roberts recommended postponing action until further discussion could be held with committee members. The Board agreed by consensus to table action until the meeting of September 18. B. Central High School Right of Way Easement The city of Little Rock requested a Corporation Dedication Deed, which would grant a small amount of property on the northeast comer of the Central High School site to allow the city to widen the curb radius at the intersection of West 14th \u0026amp; Park Streets. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the request, Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. C. Criminal Background Checks for New Non-Certified Employees Under Act 1314 of 1997, the State requires criminal background checks for all new noncertified employees, full and part-time. This background check would currently cost approximately $39 per employee, and would include fingerprinting and a background investigation by the FBI. Brady Gadberry was present to respond to questions from the Board. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the District paying for the entire cost of conducting the background check for the current (1997-98) school year. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 5-1, with Ms. Gee casting the \"no\" vote. D. Proposed School Closing for Central High School Events \u0026amp; Activities Dr. Roberts asked the Board to approve closing all high schools in the District on September 25, 1997, the day that commemorates the 40th anniversary of the integration of Central High School. He has petitioned the Arkansas Department of Education to consider that day as an excused absence for students. In addition, students in other grade levels would be granted an excused absence if parents provide a written request. Students and staff members of the District would be encouraged to participate in the scheduled activities. Ms. Magness moved to approve the Superintendent's recommendation\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page6 E. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Ms. Magness. The motion carried unanimously. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOUDEP ARTMENT ITEM DONOR Forest Park Elementary Cash to purchase Forest Park PTA computers ($10,742.) Brady Elementary 200 Folding Chairs Bradv PTA Hall High Books for ESL students Carolyn Newbern Air Conditioner for the Home Depot Field House K. Personnel Changes The Superintendent requested the Board's approval of personnel items printed in the agenda. Mr. Berkley moved to accept the recommendations, Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. L. Financial Reports Financial reports for the month of July were incomplete at the time of the meeting. They will be provided for approval at the September meeting. (Dr. Daugherty returned at 8:45 p.m.) VI. REPORT AGENDA A. Desegregation Update The update was printed in the agenda. There was no additional information provided. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page7 B. Budget Update Dr. Roberts reported that he would consider asking the Board to meet for discussion of the budget sometime during the month of September, before submission to the Arkansas Department of Education on September 15. He would like to include some budget projections from the work team recommendations in the final budget submission. In reference to the request to consider donating the Eastside building to L.O.V.E. or any other community group, Dr. Roberts asked the Board to give the administration an opportunity to review the options regarding sale or use of the building before making any decisions or promises. There have been several inquiries as to the possible sale or lease of the property and he would like to be able to recommend the best options for the District. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS VIII. None. DISCIPLINARY Dr. Daugherty made a motion to convene an executive session for the purpose of conducting student and employee disciplinary actions at 9:00 p.m. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Dr. Watson, student hearing officer, requested the Board's approval for reinstatemet of several students who had been previously suspended or expelled from the District. Each of these students will be placed under strict probation for a period of one school term. Dr. Daugherty moved to accept the recommended placements. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Students who are being reinstated and their recommended placements are listed in the table which follows. STUDENT Danielle Freeman John Grant Andre Harris Herbert Harris Diana Hill Kevin Holmes Shavonne Palmer LaTan a Rice Rondi Smith PREVIOUS SCHOOL Central Hi Central Hi Central Hi RECOMMENDED PLACEMENT am am REGULAR BOARD MEETING August 28, 1997 Page 8 The Board recessed briefly and reconvened at 9:20 p.m. to consider an employee's appeal of District disciplinary actions. (Dr. Daugherty excused himself from the hearing.) Jonathan Miller had been an employee of the Plant Services Department and was represented in this hearing by Attorney Alvin Clay. The District was represented by Clay Fendley. Mr. Miller had been an employee of the District for over 12 years. He was accused of being in possession of a handgun on District property. The incident occurred after the regular school/work day during an athletic event at Quigley stadium. His attorney, Mr. Clay, asked the Board to give Mr. Miller another opportunity, and Ray Gillespie, District Athletic Director, testified on his behalf. Mr. Miller was working for Mr. Gillespie at the time of the incident. Doug Eaton, Director of Plant Services, testified that he had brought the charges against Mr. Miller and that there were charges filed in Pulaski County Circuit Court related to the altercation. The incident had been reported to Bobby Jones, Director of Safety \u0026amp; Security for the District on the morning after the incident. Dr. Roberts recommended that the Board suspend Mr. Miller, without pay, pending the final outcome of the charges that are pending in Circuit Court. Mr. Miller would then have the option of coming back to the Board to ask to be reinstated if he is cleared of the charges in Circuit Court. Ms. Magness made a motion to suspend Mr. Miller indefinitely, without pay. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. ADJOURNMENT The Board returned from executive session at 9:30 p.m. Ms. Magness moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Berkley, and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: 9-(g-q1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING September 11, 1997 SEP 2 6 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, September 11, 1997, immediately following the regularly scheduled agenda meeting, at 810 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. John Riggs, President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Riggs, IV Judy Magness Larry Berkley Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Micheal Daugherty ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Riggs called the meeting to order at 5:47 p.m. Six members of the Board were present\nDr. Daugherty was absent. Carthoria Johnson, teacher ex officio from Bale Elementary School was also present. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING September 11, 1997 Page2 PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The meeting was called for the purpose of approving the 1997-98 budget submission to the Arkansas Department of Education. ACTION: Board members were provided copies of a budget summary earlier this week. They were also given a copy of the full budget submission prior to the meeting. Mark Milhollen was present to respond to questions. Dr. Roberts reminded the Board that the budget can be modified further after submission to the State. He asked the Board to consider a budget work session sometime within the next few weeks. The Board agreed to conduct a work session on October 9, in conjunction with the regular October agenda meeting. Ms. Magness moved to approve the submission to the Arkansas Department of Education. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:55 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley. APPROVED: q -{ 8 ,q ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 RECEIVED OCT 2 9 1 97 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its monthly meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, September 18, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. This meeting was rescheduled from the usual 4th Thursday to the 3rd Thursday to accommodate plans for the 40th anniversary programs commemorating the integration of Central High School. The President, John Riggs, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Riggs, IV Judy Magness Micheal Daugherty Larry Berkley Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESE T: Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Les Carnine, Superintendent Designee Carthoria Johnson, Teacher Ex-officio Yolanda Baskins, Student Ex-officio Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Board President, John Riggs, called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Daugherty arrived at 6:20 p.m. and Dr. Mitchell arrived at 7:00 p.m. Judge Chris Piazza was present to administer the oath of office to Little Rock School District Board members Judy Magness, Pat Gee, and Sue Strickland. Ruth White Tucker, re-elected to the Pulaski County Special School District Board, and Ernie Davis, re-elected to a position on the Pulaski County Board of Education, were also sworn in by Judge Piazza. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page2 II. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of August 28, 1997, and a special meeting on September 11, 1997, were presented for the Board's approval. Ms. Magness moved to approve the minutes as written. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. III. PRESENTATIONS: A. SUPERINTENDENT The Superintendent introduced Greg Harris and Barbara Byrd, teachers at M. L. King Elementary School. They were recently recognized for their programs to teach economics to elementary students by the Bessie B. Moore Arkansas Awards program. Kiffany Pride was also awarded an honorable mention, but was unable to attend the Board meeting. William Reid, owner of Reid-Vining Jewelers, was recognized for restoring two silver trophies that have been on display in the Central High School trophy case for many years. Age had blackened and corroded these trophies, dated 1908 and 1910. He presented the restored trophies to Principal Rudolph Howard. Dr. Roberts presented a certificate ofrecognition to Sharon Brooks, principal of Rightsell Incentive School. Ms. Brooks recently hosted U.S. Secretary of Transportation Rodney Slater and his staff on a tour of Rightsell, which included a visit with students and a live broadcast from the school's media center. Ms. Brooks was commended for the work she does at Rightsell, for the high expectations set for staff and students, and for her strong leadership abilities. Marion Woods was introduced to present certificates to the first graduates of the Mahl on Martin Professional Development Leadership class. The District received a Goals 2000 grant to fund this staff development program. The graduates are: Stacy Blacknall Marian Jackson Mary A. Smith Marilyn Bostic Mary Lawson Eunice Thrasher Sharon Bryant Ken Milton Janis Tucker Luverda Clay Debra Murray William Vann Carmelia Crawford Mike Peterson Nona Whittaker Donna Hall Julia Post R. J. Williams Gregory Harris Bemestine Rhodes Clarice Woodley Rory Hill Lillie Scull Karen Worsham Laureen Isom REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page 3 The final citations were presented to Carthoria Johnson, teacher ex-officio from Bale Elementary and Yolanda Baskins, student ex-officio from Hall High School. B. CITIZENS COMMITTEES Baker Kurrus, representing the Little Rock Alliance for Our Public Schools, spoke in support of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan proposed by Dr. Roberts and presented to the Board in August. Odies Wilson, vice president of the Alliance Board, also addressed the board and asked them to make a commitment to the process of educating the children in our community by voting in favor of the proposed desegregation and education plan. He announced that the Alliance would work with the Chamber of Commerce over the next few weeks to develop a city-wide reading initiative. Jim Hathaway, representing Fifty for the Future, expressed support for the revised Plan and asked the Board and administrators to focus on strong fiscal management of the District. To promote stability, he suggested hiring additional, qualified staff and reorganizing the current staff to make operations more efficient. Speaking on behalf of the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce, Hubert Barksdale read a resolution adopted by the Chamber Board. He also introduced Paula Patterson, the newly appointed Chairman of the Chamber Education Committee. D. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Office of Desegregation Monitoring Melissa Gulden was present and spoke briefly to the Board. ODM has not been monitoring in the LRSD this year, therefore there are no issues or concerns to report at this time. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter remarked on the cooperative efforts of the task force which has been working to coordinate technology training for over 600 employees who have expressed interest in this area. He also reported receiving several calls from teachers who want to participate in activities at Central High School on September 25, and he asked the Board to consider allowing all employees the opportunity to attend. He concluded his presentation by remarking that he had worked with the faculty at Metropolitan who were concerned about implementation of an alternative program at that school. He introduced Laurie Prather, who teaches at Metropolitan. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page4 Ms. Prather stated that the faculty and staff is not opposed to locating an alternative program at Metro, but that they are concerned about how the students would be served. She stated the faculty feels that they had been left out of the planning process and should have been consulted earlier. 3. Joshua Intervenors No report. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PTA Council No report. E. BOARD MEMBERS Dr. Daugherty congratulated Ms. Magness, Ms. Gee and Ms. Strickland on their re-election\nall three were uncontested for their seats on the Board. He also introduced Dr. Dwayne Jackson who attended the meeting. Ms. Gee remarked that, although she was unopposed, she did not take the election for granted. She promised to continue to work towards a more cooperative and unified Board. Mr. Berkley also congratulated the re-elected Board members and stated that he was looking forward to the next year. Ms. Magness introduced her family and thanked them for their support of her service on the Board. She stated that she appreciated the opportunity to serve three more years and thanked district employees for the great beginning of school. She recognized the Alliance and Chamber of Commerce Board and thanked them for their contribution to the success of the past year. Ms. Strickland introduced her husband and thanked him for supporting her in her efforts on the Board. REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page 5 IV. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS V. Maureen Rose from Waste Management of Arkansas was present as Murfee Green, a character who promotes recycling education programs. She provided copies of educational materials WMA will distribute to our students promoting recycling. Dick Burchett introduced himself as a supporter of Metropolitan and the program offered there. He questioned the Board about the selection of Metro as a site for new alternative learning programs. Mr. Burchett stated that his wife is a teacher at Metro and that he lives in Bryant. Sandy Becker, chair of Strategic Planning Team 5, School and Community Partnerships, stated support for the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan proposed by Dr. Roberts. He welcomed Dr. Carnine to the District and pledged his support in the coming year. Mr. Becker encouraged the Board to continue to support the Strategic Planning process and continue to bring new opportunities to the students. The Board took a briefrecess and reconvened at 7:30 p.m. ACTION AGENDA A. Election of Officers Mr. Riggs opened the floor to nominations for the position of President of the Board. Mr. Berkley nominated Ms. Magness. Dr. Mitchell moved that the nominations be closed and that Ms. Magness be elected by acclamation. The vote was unanimous. For the position of Vice President, Ms. Strickland nominated Mr. Berkley. Mr. Riggs moved that the nominations close, seconded by Dr. Daugherty. The vote was unanimous. Mr. Riggs nominated Dr. Daugherty for the position of Secretary. He moved that the nominations close and that Dr. Daugherty be elected by acclamation. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Approval of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan Dr. Roberts presented a summary of the modifications to the Plan which had been provided to the Board at the August 28 Board meeting and urged the Board to approve the Plan for submission to the Court. He indicated that approval of this Plan by the Court would restore a common sense approach to educating the children of Little Rock and would result in a significant increase in the levels of parent and community involvement in the schools. - REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page6 Mr. Riggs made a motion to approve the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and authorize our attorneys to file the plan and any necessary supporting documents with the district court within the time allowed by the district court's order approving the plan development period. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A transcript of the Board member's comments regarding the approval of this Plan for submission is attached to these minutes. C. Approval of the 1996-97 Annual Report The District's 1996-97 Annual Report was printed as a part of the agenda and Suellen Vann, Director of Communications, was present to respond to questions. She reminded the Board that under Arkansas law, this report must be filed by October 1 of each year. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the report. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. D. Approval of the Student Rights \u0026amp; Responsibilities Handbook Dr. Roberts briefly reviewed changes that had been incorporated into this year's Rights \u0026amp; Responsibilities Handbook. Linda Watson, Student Hearing Officer, and members of the handbook committee were present to respond to questions from the Board. Ms. Gee moved to approve the handbook, Mr. Riggs seconded the motion, and it carried 6-0 . Dr. Daugherty left the meeting and was not present for the remainder of the meeting. E. Goals 2000 Grant Application An application for a Goals 2000 grant had been submitted to the Arkansas Department of Education for a September 12 deadline. The Board was asked to approve maintenance of that submission. The grant would provide continuation funding for two professional development programs established in 1996 with Goals 2000 funding. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the submission. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. F. Ratification of Aides \u0026amp; Custodians Contract The Board was provided with information on the negotiated contract with District Custodians and paraprofessionals. Mr. Gadberry was present to respond to questions from the Board. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the contract agreements. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. G. Consolidated Application for Special Education and Related Services, 1997-98 The 1997-98 application for special education funding was presented for the Board's approval. Ms. Strickland moved to approve the application for submission to the Arkansas Department of Education. Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page7 H. Resolution: Arkansas Public Schools Week Suellen Vann, Director of Communication, presented a resolution in support of the Arkansas School Public Relations Association celebration of Arkansas Public Schools Week, October 5-11, 1997. This year's theme is Everyone's Business ... Everyone's Future. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the resolution, seconded by Dr. Mitchell. The resolution was approved, 6-0. I. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Mr. Riggs made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Dr. Mitchell. The motion carried unanimously. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR McClellan High $100.00 cash First Commercial Bank Chicot Elementary $102.00 cash Loomis, Fargo \u0026amp; Company Franklin Incentive RCA VCR Connie Simpson Sears VCR Ellistine Gaddy Dell Computer System Arkansas Democrat Hall High Air Conditioner for Best Buy Field House Fulbright Elementarv Microwave/CBI class Easy Cash Pawn Shop Wilson Elementary Frigidaire Refrigerator Valerie Pearsall/Rich Roy Pulaski Heights Jr. High Four IBM Computer Arkansas Community systems, assorted Foundation software and accessories Eight IBM Computer PHJHPTA systems with uogrades Otter Creek Elementary Five IBM hard drives, Steve Aurillio, Alltel keyboards and monitors Mabelvale Elementary Apple II GS Computer Les \u0026amp; Jerri Sue Finch - REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page 8 J. Personnel Changes The Superintendent requested the Board's approval of personnel items printed in the agenda. Mr. Riggs moved to accept the recommendations, Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. K. Financial Reports Financial information for the months of July and August were presented in the Board agenda. Mr. Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services, responded to questions from the Board. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the reports as presented. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VI. REPORT AGENDA A. Budget Update The Board did not hear a budget update, but scheduled a budget work session for October 9, 1997. B. Board Goals Update The Board reviewed the status of the goals established May 22, 1997. Mr. Berkley and Ms. Magness will develop a strategy to begin reviewing and revising the Board policy manual over the next few months. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS None. VIII. DISCIPLINARY The Board convened an executive session for the purpose of hearing a student disciplinary petition. Dr. Linda Watson presented a student reinstatement petition for Latesha West, who had been expelled from Southwest Jr. High School during the 1996-97 school year. Latesha had enrolled at the P.C. Juvenile Justice Center and had earned passing grades in that program. Dr. Watson recommended reinstatement on strict probation to a district junior high school. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the administration's recommendation. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING September 18, 1997 Page9 ADJOURNMENT The Board returned from executive session at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Riggs moved for adjournment, seconded by Dr. Mitchell, and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: /0. ).J. o/7 Riggs: Daugherty: Magness: Daugherty: Magness: Berkley: LRSD Board of Directors Meeting September 18, 1997 TRANSCRIPT - BOARD MEMBERS COMMENTS on Revised Desegregation and Education Plan Recommend by Superintendent Don Roberts MOTION: I move we approve the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and authorize our attorneys to fi le the plan and any necessary supporting documents with the district court with in the time allowed by the district court's order approving the plan development period. Second. Is there any discussion? There is. I've looked at all the information that different groups have provided for us, I've talked with Dr. Roberts about the different things within the Plan, and I definitely support the Plan, but I don't want us to forget that there was a reason for this deseg. order in the first place. That there were problems that faced this district and this country that people were not willing to acknowledge or deal with and unfortunately it took going to court in order to get people to comply, and in order to do the right thing. And rather than do the right thing, some of the parents took their kids out of our schools. But even with that we still continue to educate kids in this district. By voting for this I'm not saying that I disagree with the efforts of Mr. Walker and individuals like him, because it was individuals like Mr. Walker that made the difference. It was his effort, and efforts of people and attorneys like him that began the change. But, after awhile after you've fought dragons for so long, when you go out you're looking for dragons even when there aren't any left. We are fortunate to have had Dr. Roberts for this last year. He's really made a difference. We look forward to the work of Dr. Carnine. But I don't want this Board, because we are going to be judged by what we are implementing here tonight. We can say last year - year before last that we didn't have anything to do with the old deseg plan. But this is ours and we are going to be judged by this. So it's going to be up to us to make sure that the things in here are implemented and done according to what the judge directs us to do. But again, I don't take anything away from the individuals who had to go out and fight to get individuals within this district, at one point, to comply and do the right thing. And, you know, as I said, I do support this. Thank you. Any other discussion? Mr. Berkley. I appreciate your comments Dr. Daugherty. I think we have to keep in mind that the whole purpose for the original desegregation litigation was to assure and demand equitable education. And we are in a different place than we were when this was initiated as a nation and as a city, and I want to say that I have never experienced anything in the schools that I've been to, the people I've talked to, anything other than a total commitment to that issue. Board members, teachers, principals, the superintendent, everybody who I've talked to realizes that it is a moral, ethical, right thing to do, and I congratulate Dr. Roberts on the development of this plan and on the community input that was required to develop it and I absolutely support it. LRSD Board of Directors Meeting September 18, 1997 Page 2 Magness: Mitchell: Magness: Riggs: Thank you. Dr. Mitchell I simply want to say again that the best recruitment tool that the District can have is one where we are providing quality education for the children that we serve regardless to where they live and how they look. I'm just pleased that we now have something to submit to the court that really focuses on what we should be doing - - providing educational opportunities for the children and I'm glad that it's not detailed as to how it's going to be done, Dr. Roberts, because frankly, that's one of the things that impeded our progress before, that we were too specific, too detailed, I mean, in whatever you wrote in the plan the people expected for you to do it whether it worked or not. Or it if didn't work, you had to prove it didn't. And so in order for us to be effective at the schools, to provide the activities to devise the activities to use whatever educational programs that would better meet the needs of the children in that particular setting, that I think this is the best way to present it, and not go into any specific details so I support it and I'm glad that we are now focusing on what we ought to be doing and not just throwing out bait to try to lure people to the district. But show that our students are important . . . (End of tape 1 - remainder of Dr. Mitchell's comments are inaudible.) Mr. Riggs I certainly agree with the other Board members on what they've said about what we're trying to do tonight. I particularly empathize and understand some of the comments Dr. Daugherty made about the people in the past who have fought for the rights of our children and those people to me are heroes. The other thing that he said, that we have to be cognizant of, and I caution this Board or talk to you or maybe I will talk to you for the next year anyway - is that when we agree on this plan, if we pass this plan tonight, we are making a contract with the community to follow this, and they are going to hold us accountable, and not only do you make a contract for yourselves, but you make a contract for all the Boards that follow you. I've sat up here at this dais before, with Dr. Mitchell and Ms. Gee, and wondered who it was that put that past plan in place, and I can even remember some Board members saying \"Well, we didn't vote on it, so we're not going to do it.\" and we landed in Court. We accepted that, didn't we? That Board member's not on this Board right now. But I want to caution you about that, and as part of Board leadership the Board members that follow us -- that needs to be part of our policy that we teach them the obligations they have. You can't allow Board members to come onto this Board and not know the obligations that we are making for them tonight and for the next several years. So, particularly our three new Board members who are going to be here for at least three years, I want to encourage you to keep that thought in mind as you get new Board members on this Board, that part of their education process has to be that we show them the obligations that they have as a member of this Board. Lastly, I just want to say to this Board we are at a historic crossroads. Although we've had a lot of hoopla in town about what's going to go on in the city this week and next week, I believe ten years hence and probably twenty years hence a lot will be forgotten about the 40th anniversary of the desegregation of Central High. But the steps you take tonight, I think, will be remembered .. because you're taking, in my opinion, taking a good school district - one of the best in Arkansas - and making it a world class school district. And I think those are historic steps. LRSD Board of Directors Meeting September 18, 1997 Page 3 Magness: Thank you. Any other comments? That was well said. Thank you all for your comments. We do have a motion on the floor - to approve the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and authorize our attorneys to file the plan and any necessary supporting documents with the district court within the time allowed by the district court's order approving the plan development period. All those in favor (Unanimous vote.) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT September 26, 1997 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: SEP 2 6 i~~' Off\\C0r OtSEGR~Gfi.i\\Oi4 t/lOtliOR\\Wl I am enclosing minutes of LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on August 28 and September 11, 1997. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Enclosures Sincerely, Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2000 REC IVE-LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS oc 2 9 t!l97 mliCECF MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING October 15, 1997 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Wednesday, October 15, 1997, at 810 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Judy Magness, President, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley John Riggs, IV Katherine Mitchell MEMBERS ABSENT: Micheal Daugherty Pat Gee Sue Strickland ALSO PRESENT: Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Ms. Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Ms. Magness called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. Four members of the Board were present\nDr. Daugherty, Ms. Gee and Ms. Strickland were absent. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING \"ft\n:1T~'UI1!~\\S The meeting was called for the purpose of reinstating students who had been suspended or expelled previously and for conducting student disciplinary appeal hearings. MINUTES - SPECIAL BOARD MEETING October 15, 1997 Page2 ACTION: Linda Watson, Student Hearing Officer, presented information on the recommendation for expulsion from Central High School of student Antoine Shephard. Dr. Watson had upheld the school's recommendation and Antoine's mother, Ms. McDonald, asked to appeal that decision to the Board. Antoine (and his brother, Corey) had been involved in a major fight at school on September 30, 1997, and had both been charged with inciting to riot. Dr. Watson had recommended placement in the Juvenile Justice Center, Step-One Alternative Program. The superintendent recommended upholding the schools petition for expulsion and concurred with the alternative placement recommended by Dr. Watson. Mr. Riggs made a motion to uphold the administration's recommendation. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 4-0. Ms. McDonald withdrew her request for a hearing on Corey Shepherd's expulsion recommendation. The Board was also presented with a list of students who were recommended for placement in alternative settings, but who had not requested a hearing before the Board. Additional information was requested from the Student Hearing Officer before action by the Board. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:02 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley, seconded by Mr .Riggs. (1d~ ,( /m-Ld',Y -l'dc---=: ~J~Magness, President APPROVED: lo -\n3. 1: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 REC IVED NOV 2 5 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its monthly meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, October 23, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. The President, Judy Magness, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell John Riggs, IV Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Marva Pearson, Teacher Ex-officio Hanna Dolle, Student Ex-officio Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. Board President, Judy Magness, called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. Ex-officio members of the Board were also present: Hanna Dolle, student at McClellan, and Marva Pearson, teacher at Baseline. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of September 18, and a special meeting on October 15, 1997, were presented for the Board's approval. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the minutes as written. Mr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page2 III. PRESENTATIONS: A. SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Roberts introduced Daryl Newcomb, a teacher at Booker Arts Magnet Elementary School. Ms. Newcomb was recently selected by Entergy Arkansas as an Outstanding Teacher of the Year for 1997. She was also named as a finalist for the 1998 Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching. A superintendent's citation was presented to Claudia Rodgers, physical educ~tion teacher at Dunbar Junior High School. Ms. Rodgers was recently honored by the Association of Teacher Educators as the Outstanding Cooperating Teacher of the Year. Dr. Roberts presented a citation to Frances McCorkle in recognition of her selection as a participant in the Fulbright Memorial Fund Teacher Program. Ms. McCorkle will visit Japan for three weeks next fall. Representatives from Centro Hispano were honored for volunteer hours contributed to help Chicot Elementary School families during the opening of school this fall. Karen Latch, teacher at Williams Magnet Elementary School, received a Superintendent's citation for recently being named as a recipient of the Arkansas Retired Teachers Association Parsons-Burnett Scholarship. The $1,000 award is for continuing education. The superintendent recognized a number of people who contributed to the Central High School Fortieth Anniversary recognition programs. Central staff members Rudolph Howard, Nancy Rousseau and Brenda James were present to accept citations of appreciation for the time they contributed to making the events a success. Mr. Howard also received a certificate of appreciation from the White House Communications Agency in recognition of his assistance to the presidential staff. Vicki Saviers, Cynthia East, Billie Rutherford, and Jeannie Andrews, PT A officers at Central High School, were recognized for the time they devoted to planning the many activities that were scheduled at Central over the last month. Doug Eaton and staff members at Plant Services were recognized for their extra efforts in ensuring that all of the maintenance projects were completed before the Central High School anniversary events. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 3 Several months oflandscaping projects were coordinated by Jerry Compton of ServiceMaster Management Services. ServiceMaster donated $10,000 to make improvements to the front lawn at Central High School\nthe district matched this amount and much of the work was done by volunteers from Merlin E. Seamon Associates, Master Gardners, and 4-H Club members. Southwestern Bell and its employees were given citations recognizing their donation of $100,000 worth of Internet access wiring at Central High School. Members of the Southwestern Bell Pioneers and the Communications Workers of America volunteered their time to install the wiring during their off hours. The final citations were given to the ex-officio Board members for the month of October\nMarva Pearson, teacher from Baseline Elementary, and Hanna Dolle, student from McClellan High School. The final presentation was to Board member John Riggs, who was recognized for his year of service as president of the board. The other members of the Board presented him with a gavel. B. PARTNERSHIPS Debbie Milam, VIPS Coordinator for the District, recognized recently formed partnerships between schools and community businesses. Those partnerships include: ITT Technical Institute, represented by Kevin Standiford and Dr. Pat Honeycutt, partnering with McClellan High School, represented by Patricia McMurray and Jodie Carter Little Rock Hilton, represented by Sandra Anthony, Anrianne Beck and Tracy Bennett, partnering with McClellan High School, represented by Patricia McMurray and Jodie Carter ITT Technical Institute, represented by Kevin Standiford and Dr. Pat Honneycutt, partnering with Metropolitan Vocational Center, represented by Michael Peterson Mr. Riggs made a motion to accept the new partnerships. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page4 C. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - 1. Office of Desegregation Monitoring Melissa Gulden thanked Dr. Roberts for serving as superintendent during the past year and for providing positive leadership for the District. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Frank Martin spoke on behalf of the faculty at Metropolitan, some of whom are opposed to placement of the ALE program on the Metro campus. He stated that the community would be opposed to having alternative education students at that site and that some of them would probably transfer their students out of the district. 3. Joshua Intervenors No report. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PT A Council No report. D. BOARD MEMBERS Dr. Daugherty acknowledged that there were concerns about placement for students with disciplinary problems and students who merely had problems learning in the regular classroom setting. He stated that the proposed alternative programs were geared to address the needs of the individual students. Dr. Mitchell issued a challenge to parents and teachers to form partnerships to provide children with the things they really need in order to succeed in learning. She stated that children do best in school when parents, teachers and the community cooperate as a support team. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 5 Mr. Riggs thanked the Board for allowing him to serve as president for the past year. He congratulated three people who have recently been publicly recognized for outstanding service to the school district\nMarian Lacey for receiving the Milken Award, Diane Vibhaker for being recognized by the Arkansas Times as a \"hero\", and Don Roberts who has worked with the Board over the past year to ensure that they had a productive year while searching for a new superintendent. Mr. Berkley congratulated Mr. Howard and the Central High School staff for providing a positive focus on Little Rock schools during the recent national media focus. Ms. Magness thanked the staff and volunteers at Central High School for the work they had done over the past few months preparing for the 40th year commemoration events. Ms. Magness had attended a coffee at Wilson Elementary School, read to first grade students at Watson Elementary School, and attended a sixth grade musical production at the PT A open house at Jefferson Elementary. She complimented the good behavior of Dunbar band students who marched in the red ribbon parade, and thanked Mike Peterson and the Culinary Arts students at Metro for hosting the October agenda meeting. IV. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS Todd Skaggs introduced himself as a former culinary arts student at Metro. He spoke in opposition to placing alternative education students at the Metro campus. Michael Drake spoke in support of the Pankey property deed extension. He is a member of CANDO, an alliance of fourteen west Little Rock churches, which has pledged their support to the building of a Pankey Community center. Sandy Becker thanked the Board for continuing their support of the Pankey community in their efforts to build a community center. He serves as pastor of a church in that community. Wali Caradine, with Architectural Innovations Group, is working with the Pankey Community to develop the plans for building a community center. He provided information on plans that must be approved by the city planning commission. Ray Walters serves as a mentor to students at Metro. He asked the board not to approve plans to place an alternative program at Metro. Rick Evans teaches at Metro and expressed concerns about placement of ALE students at the Metro campus. He stated that area students and those from Bryant and Bauxite would pull out of the Metro Vocational programs if alternative students were assigned to attend there. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page6 Tracy Hairston, a student in the Metro extended day program, asked the Board to consider other placement for the ALE students. Larry Lee stated that training provided at Metro is not available anywhere else. He suggested that the students at Metro attend there because they want to be there and that Metro would not \"work\" for ALE students who are forced to attend the programs or who do not have a choice about where they are assigned. David McCree teaches radio and television broadcasting at Metropolitan. He asked the Board not to assign ALE students to Metro programs in the middle of the school year and stated that courses offered there require that students be there from the beginning of the semester. He stated that vocational education does not have a good reputation and that the public perception of having an ALE program will impact negatively on the success of Metro. Selma Douglas addressed the board as a 43-year resident of the Pankey community. She provided historical information on the land that has been proposed for development as a community center site. Robert Savary, who serves on the Metro Board, stated that proposed changes to the Metro program will be a detriment to the school's success. He asked the Board not to approve the recommended ALE programs. V. ACTION AGENDA Mr. Riggs asked the Board to reorder the agenda to allow Item \"F\" to become Item \"A\" on the action agenda. There were no objections to his request. A. Resolution: Beacons/School-Based Community Centers Dorothy N ayles, representing New Futures, made a brief slide presentation to update the Board on a proposal for operating school-based community centers. The Board was asked to adopt a resolution supporting the school-based community center concept which promotes collaboration with the City of Little Rock, the Department of Health, the Department of Human Services, New Futures for Youth, and the Pulaski County United Way. Dr. Daugherty made a motion to approve the resolution, Mr. Riggs seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A copy of the resolution is attached to these minutes. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 7 B. Central High Architectural Conservation Planning Grant The Board was asked to approve submission of a planning grant to the Getty Grant Program of Los Angeles. The application request is in the amount of $25,000 for planning restoration and architectural conservation of Central High School. Ms. Gee moved to approve the submission. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried 7-0. The Board elected to take action on items C, D, and E with a blanket motion C. National Science Foundation Grant A grant application was submitted to the National Science Foundation to establish a fiveyear program to increase enrollment in upper level mathematics and science courses. First year applicants are allowed up to $200,000 for start up activities and recipients are allowed to apply for up to $800,000 in years two through five. The Board was asked to approve the submission. D. Vital Link Grant The Board was asked to approve the submission of an application to the Little Rock Education Commission for financial support in the amount of $35,000 for the Vital Link Program. This funding would pay transportation costs for the summers of 1998 and 1999. E. Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities Applications As a recipient of federal funds, the district is required to implement a comprehensive drug abuse prevention program in grades K-12. The 1997-98 allocation will be in the amount of $166,696.00, and the Board was asked to approve the application for submission to the Arkansas Department of Education. Mrs. Elston was present to respond to questions from the Board. Mr. Riggs moved to approve items C, D, and E. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. F. Resolution: Arkansas Drug Free Youth and Red Ribbon Campaign In support of the National Red Ribbon Campaign for Drug Free Youth, the Board was asked to adopt a resolution endorsing Red Ribbon Week and urging all citizens to make a commitment to drug free education and to the future of our children. Dr. Mitchell moved to adopt the resolution. Mr. Riggs seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A copy of that resolution is attached to these minutes. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 8 G. Pankey Community Center - Approval to Amend Deed An amended deed for property previously transferred to Pankey Community Improvement Association, Inc. was presented for the Board's approval. The PCIA asked the Board to extend the requirement to construct a building for educational and/or community center purposes to January 1, 2000. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the deed amendment. Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. A copy of the amended deed is attached to these minutes. H. Service Learning Sites A listing of Service Learning Sites recommended by the Arkansas Division of Volunteerism was presented for the Board's approval. In addition to approval of the sites listed, the Board was asked to approve Central High MuseumNisitors Center and Advocates for Battered Women as Service Learning Sites for LRSD students. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the service learning sites listing. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 7-0. I. Alternative Learning Environment Proposal for 1997-98 The Superintendent asked the Board to approve Alternative Learning Environment sites at the Alternative Learning Center, Forest Heights Jr. High School, Metropolitan VocationalTechnical Education Center, Penick Boys Club, and the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Dr. Roberts responded to questions from the Board. Dr. Daugherty, Mr. Berkley and Mr. Riggs spoke in support of the motion\nMs. Gee spoke in opposition. Ms. Strickland made the motion to approve the proposal, seconded by Mr. Berkley. The motion carried 6-1, with Ms. Gee casting the \"no\" vote. The Board took a briefrecess at 8:45 p.m. and returned at 8:50 p.m. Dr. Daugherty did not return from recess. J. 1997-98 Budget Submission The Board was asked to approve draft 7 of the proposed 1997-98 budget which was reviewed extensively at the work session on October 9, 1997. The revised figures included recommendations from the work groups, computer technology training time for teachers, and increased funding for the ALE programs. A $2,000,000 draw from the settlement loan fund was reflected in the submission. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the revised budget. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page9 K. Interim Millage Adjustment The board was asked to approve a resolution setting the personal property and real property rates at 41 .40 mills. The State of Arkansas requires the Board of school districts in Pulaski County to certify their applicable tax rates to the County Clerk prior to the regular November quorum court meeting. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the resolution, seconded by Ms. Gee. The motion carried 6-0. L. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Ms. Strickland. The motion carried 6-0. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR VIPS Program $1,000 for Vital Link Entergy Corp McDermott Elementary $9,000 for construction McDermott PT A of a retaining wall Pulaski Heights Elementary Kenmore Refrigerator \u0026amp; Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Sidney Ogden 12 x 12 carpet Computer/Monitor/ Ms. Mildred Cooper Printer/Software 100 primarv chairs Pulaski Heights PT A Chicot Elementary $240 cash to fund field Anonymous trips M. Personnel Changes The Superintendent requested the Board's approval of personnel items printed in the agenda. Dr. Mitchell moved to accept the recommendations, Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 10 N. Financial Reports Financial information for the month of September was presented in the Board agenda. Mr. Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services, responded to questions from the Board. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the reports as presented. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. VI. REPORT AGENDA A. Articulation Agreement - ITT Technical Institute An agreement with ITT Technical Institute was reported for the Board's information. Through this agreement, students will receive advanced college credit for 1st year Drafting and Design, 2nd year Engineering, Drafting and Design, and 1st and 2nd year Electronics Technology courses taken at Metropolitan. B. Desegregation Update The Desegregation Update for the month of October was printed in the Board's agenda. There were no additional questions. C. Board Goals Update The Board goals, established May 22, 1997, were provided for review. There were no additional questions or comments. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS None. VIII. DISCIPLINARY Dr. Linda Watson presented a student appeal petition for an expulsion recommendation from Central. The student, Brandon Davis, was represented by Attorney Michael Booker. Clay Fendley from the Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Law Firm was present for the District. Brandon was charged with inciting to riot for an incident involving a group of students at Central High School on September 30, 1997. Witnesses to the incident were present: Andrea Smith, Security Guard, Little Rock Police Resource Officer Mobley, and Eric Brandon, teacher and coach at Central. In addition, Rudolph Howard, principal and Brenda James, assistant principal, were present. REGULAR BOARD MEETING October 23, 1997 Page 11 All of the witnesses indicated that the incident was, or appeared to be gang related. Brandon denied any participation in gang activity at Central and denied that he had participated in the fight. Brandon's mother, Sharon Davis, was present and asked the Board to reinstate Brandon to Central High School. Keith Richardson was also present to speak on Brandon's behalf and to appeal to the Board to allow Brandon to return to school. Although the school administration agreed that Brandon had not participated in the actual fighting, they determined that he had been a party to the escalation of the fight by flashing hand signals that were, or appeared to be, gang-related. The Superintendent recommended the Board uphold the administration's request for expulsion. Ms. Gee moved to discuss the matter in executive session. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 5-1, with Mr. Riggs casting the \"no\" vote. The Board returned from executive session at 10:35 p.m. to report that no action had been taken. Ms. Strickland moved to accept the administration's recommendation for expulsion. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion. Mr. Riggs and Ms. Gee spoke in opposition to the motion\nMr. Berkley spoke in support of the expulsion recommendation. The motion for expulsion passed by a vote of 4-2, with Ms. Gee and Mr. Riggs casting the \"no\" votes. On another student disciplinary action, Dr. Watson presented a request for reinstatement for Tommy Glaspie. Tommy had been expelled from Southwest Jr. High School in February 1997. He completed the 1996-97 school term at the Pulaski County Juvenile Detention Center. He presented a request for reinstatement to the Little Rock School District for placement in the 10th grade. Based on the information presented, Dr. Watson recommended reinstatement on strict probation, with assignment at McClellan High School. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the reinstatement petition. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. ADJOURNMENT Dr. Mitchell moved for adjournment at 10:43 p.m., seconded by Mr. Riggs, and it carried unanimouslv. ~?J~ -M-i-ch-e-al-D-au-gh-erty-,-~.-~.e.. ,,_e_~ Resolution A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE SCHOOL-BASED COrv1:MUNITY CENTER CONCEPT\nDIRECTING THE CONTINUANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IN PARTNERSIDP WITH THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK AND VARIOUS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Whereas, the Little Rock School District Board of Directors continues to support the development of quality programming for the youth in our City\nand Whereas, the Little Rock School District Board of Directors continues to promote the development of collaborative efforts with the City of Little Rock, the Department of Health, the Department of Human Services, New Futures for Youth and the Pulaski County United Way\nand Whereas, the School District supports the utilization of existing resources, i.e. public school facilities and existing programming to develop community-based initiatives that strengthen school, family and community linkages\nand Whereas, the School-Based Community Center concept is a comprehensive, year-round, after-school, neighborhood-based, safe haven for children and family support, located in public school buildings and operated by community-based organizations\nNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED The Little Rock School District Board of Directors supports the concept of School-Based Community Centers and directs the Superintendent to work with the City of Little Rock, the Department of Health, the Department of Human Services, New Futures for Youth and the Pulaski County United Way to develop ideas for programs, funding, and operation of these community-based centers in the public schools. Little Rock School District Board of Directors 1 ( ' w ~ )?h_.\"[?f-c~/ Micheal Daughi,\u0026amp;cretary Whereas, Arkansas' youth have a right to be educated in an environment conducive to learning\nand Whereas, all schools and administrative buildings of the Little Rock School District are designated as Drug Free Zones\nand Whereas, programs such as D.A.R.E., Just Say No, T.R.U.C.E., Peer Helpers and Student Assistance which promote drug awareness and prevention for youth, have been implemented in Little Rock public schools\nand Whereas, during the week of October 25-31, 1997 special emphasis will be placed upon drug free youth with the observance of National Red Ribbon Week\nand Whereas, a joint effort must be made by parents, schools, and the community working together toward a common commitment for preparing our children to be tomorrow's leaders, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Little Rock School District endorses National Red Ribbon Week and urges all citizens to make a commitment to drug free education and to the future of our children. Adopted this 23rd day of October, 1997. I , :?zz/4,~e: -C,4s,z?r5 Micheal Daugherty, Secretary LTITLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT October 28, 1997 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: REC!Ei,,eo OCT 2 9 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITOR/Na I am enclosing minutes of LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on September 18 and October ,5, 1997. Please let me know ,f you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Sincerely, ~ Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent Enclosures 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2000  - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 RECEIVED JAN 1 2 199U OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONrJORU The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its monthly meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, November 20, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. The President, Judy Magness, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley Pat Gee John Riggs, IV Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Micheal Daugherty Katherine Mitchell ALSO PRESENT: Les Carnine, Superintendent of Schools Jeanette Stephenson, Student Ex-officio Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. Board President, Judy Magness, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call. Dr. Daugherty and Dr. Mitchell were absent. The Ex-officio student representative Jeanette Stephenson, student at Parkview, was also present. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of October 23 were presented for the Board's approval. Ms. Magness requested a correction to the minutes, which was noted. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the minutes as edited. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 5-0.  - REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 Page2 III. PRESENTATIONS: Ms. Magness recognized Lillie Carter, principal of Pulaski Heights Elementary School, who introduced the P. H. music teacher, Leeta Robertson, and kindergarten teachers, Ms. Willis and Ms. Neal. Kindergarten students performed a \"pipe\" demonstration of musical notes sounded by varying lengths of plastic pipe. A. SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Carnine presented a citation to Ms. Gail McKinnon, AP English teacher at Hall High School. Ms. McKinnon was recently selected to serve a second year as chief reader for the SAT II: Writing Essay in Wilmington, Delaware. Jodie Carter, principal of McClellan High School, was called to accept a certificate of recognition from the Arkansas Famous and Historic Tree Program (AFHTP) for a flowering dogwood which was planted on the campus of McClellan in 1970 during the first \"Earth Day.\" This tree, named the Marylou Andreelli Tree in honor of its' donor who was a McClellan Humanities teacher, was recently registered as official #0004 in the AFHTP. Gwen Efird, coordinator of Health Services, presented plaques and certificates of recognition to school nurses who were nominated for their commitment to students in the District. The first year nurse award was presented to Patricia Brown, who serves students at Bale Elementary and Southwest Jr. High. Stevie Cherepski was the recipient of the School Nurse of the Year Award. Ms. Cherepski provides nursing services to students at M. L. King Elementary School. In addition, six nurses were presented with certificates of recognition for their nomination in the school nurse of the year program. They were: Ann Callaway, Garland Elementary School\nBeverly Heron, Terry Elementary and Parkview Magnet Schools\nCarla Kelley, Henderson Health Science Magnet Jr. High School\nMarsha Mahan, Romine and Western Hills Elementary Schools\nLavelle Rollins, Franklin Elementary School\nand Uvita Scott, Booker Magnet Elementary School. The final citation was presented to the ex-officio student representative to the Board for the month of November, Jeannette Stephenson, from Parkview Magnet High School. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Dan Farley, representing Arkansas Friends for Better Schools, made a presentation recognizing Diane Vibhaker as a Public School Hero. Ms. Vibhaker was selected for the numerous volunteer services she provides to the District and for her commitment to public education in the city.  - REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 Page 3 B. P ARTNERSIDPS Lee Ann Matson represented the VIPS office for recognition of newly established partnerships between area businesses and schools. The following school/business partnerships were presented for the Board's approval. All About Travel in partnership with Fulbright Elementary School, represented by Mac Huffman Baptist Medical Center, represented by Colleen Woodruff, Sandra Brown and Missy Nesterenko, in partnership with Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Junior High School, represented by James Washington and Mickey Bates Dr. Beatrice Reed, Optometrist, was present to accept a certificate recognizing her partnership with McClellan Business/Community Magnet School, represented by Jodie Carter and Wanda Baskins FOXY 99.5 Radio Station, represented by Jeff Hedman, in partnership with McClellan Business/Community Magnet School, represented by Jodie Carter and Wanda Baskins Aristotle Internet Services, represented by Tara Perrin, in partnership with Washington Magnet School, represented by Jennifer Lindsey Ms. Gee made a motion to accept the new partnerships. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. C. SPECIAL PRESENT A TIO NS Office of Desegregation Monitoring Melissa Gulden had no formal report, but welcomed Dr. Carnine to the District. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Grainger Ledbetter, president of the CTA, welcomed Dr. Carnine to Little Rock and remarked that he felt positive about their first two meetings. He stated that teachers were looking forward to technology training, scheduled to begin in January. He noted concerns from the building level, including: 1) implementation of direct deposit of payroll\n2) the inadequate pool of substitute teachers\nand 3) the number of grievances which had been filed recently with the CT A.  - REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 Page4 3. Joshua Intervenors No report. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PT A Council Doris Williams thanked the Board for supporting the PTA Council and for attending Council meetings whenever possible. D. BOARD MEMBERS Ms. Gee congratulated Essie Middleton and Becky Rather for the successful 6-7 grade transition meeting which was held on November 9, at Forest Heights Jr. High School. She also remarked that the recent Board retreat was very beneficial. Ms. Gee also made a statement regarding the number of complaints she had received regarding the poor service by Laidlaw this year. She wanted parents to be assured that the District was aware of their concerns and would be looking at a number of options for transporting students next school year. Ms. Strickland thanked Ms. Magness for facilitating the Board retreat and stated that it was a wonderful way for Board members to communicate better with each other. Ms. Magness was wearing a Baseline Elementary sweat shirt and stated she had visited that school to observe the Success for All program. She had also visited Gibbs Magnet Elementary School's international festival which focused on Bolivian culture and featured food, dress, and lifestyle displays. She also commented on the success of the transition meeting at Forest Heights Jr. High School, and thanked the City of Little Rock Board of Directors who attended the recent joint meeting with the District Board. Ms Magness had prepared a summary report on the Board retreat which was distributed to other Board members.  - REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 Page 5 IV. CITIZENS COMMITTEES V. V. The National Dunbar Alumni Association presented plans for improvement of the Dunbar Magnet Jr. High School campus. Elise Argue, president of the Dunbar PTSA, and Dr. Erma Glasgow Davis, president of the National Dunbar Alumni Association, requested the District's financial support for the project, which is estimated at approximately $53,000. The Alumni association is contributing $10,000 to the PTSA for the project, which they hope to have completed by July 1999, when the National association meets in Little Rock. Chris Cooper presented the landscape plans and explained the proposal for improvements in the landscaping and structural modifications to the sidewalks and irrigation system. Zenobia Harris, parent, and Victoria Boykins, student, spoke in support of the proposal and asked for the Board's consideration. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS Don Campbell spoke to the Board regarding the District's practice of prohibiting suspended and expelled students from getting credit for school assignments. He provided letters supporting his request for the Board to reconsider the portion of the handbook which addresses this issue. ACTION AGENDA A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Mr. Riggs made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Ms. Strickland. The motion carried 5-0. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOUDEP ARTMENT ITEM DONOR Baseline Elementarv $450 for field trips Waste Management of Ark. Mann Magnet School Miscellaneous clothing Sheila Ballard items for the Drama Dept. Athletic Department $1,500 Randy Johnson/Alltel Corp. McClellan Community School $100 to Teachers of Sidney A. Moncrief Tomorrow  - REGULAR BOARD l\\1EETING November 20, 1997 Page6 M. Personnel Changes The Superintendent requested the Board's approval of personnel items printed in the agenda. Mr. Berkley moved to accept the recommendations, Ms. Gee seconded the motion and it carried 5~0. N. Financial Reports Financial information for the month of October was presented in the Board agenda. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the reports as presented. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. VI. REPORT AGENDA A. Truancy Report Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services, provided a report on truancy during the first nine week period of this school year. She also provided background information on the truancy center previously operated by the District, and current efforts to reduce truancy. The Dropout Center coordinates efforts to have students picked up by the LR Police Department and delivered to the nearest secondary school. B. Discipline Report Linda Watson provided a summary report oflong term expulsion and alternative school placements for the current school year. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS None. VIII. DISCIPLINARY None.  - REGULAR BOARD MEETING November 20, 1997 Page? ADJOURNMENT The Board adjourned at 7:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Riggs, seconded by Ms. Strickland. 1fb.1!7:.p?!i.~ APPROVED: /3-, IC-17 I JI.. , ?\nu.~, /~ ,{_ ~ Micheal Daugherty, ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 ECEnteo JAN 2 7 199B OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITOR/NG The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its monthly meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, December 18, 1997, in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. Board President, Judy Magness, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Pat Gee Katherine Mitchell John Riggs, IV MEMBERS ABSENT: Sue Strickland ALSO PRESENT: Les Carnine, Superintendent of Schools Fatimah McKindra, Student Ex-officio Gordon McIntyre, Teacher Ex-officio Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. Board President, Judy Magness, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call. Dr. Daugherty arrived at 6:18 p.m.\nMs. Strickland was absent. The ex-officio student representative, Fatimah McKindra from Central High School, and ex-officio teacher representative, Gordon McIntyre, were also present. READING OF MINUTES: The minutes from the regular board meeting of November 20, 1997, were presented for the Board's approval. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Ms. Gee. The motion carried 5-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page2 III. PRESENTATIONS: Students from the Rockefeller Show Choir, directed by Ms. I. J. Routen, performed for the Board. The children were dressed in their pajamas, robes and slippers, and sang several non-traditional Christmas songs. A. SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Carnine presented citations to the ex-officio representatives to the Board for the month of December, Fatimah McKindra, from Central High School, and Gordon McIntyre, from Brady Elementary. B. P ARTNERSIDPS Debbie Milam recognized representatives of area businesses and schools who had recently established partnerships. The following school/business partnerships were presented for the Board's approval. Jostens Learning, represented by Jim Hardwick, in partnership with Chicot Elementary School, represented by Jane Harkey and Leola Fields Barnes \u0026amp; Noble Booksellers, represented by Kathy Johnson, in partnership with Mabelvale Elementary School, represented by Donna Clark Party City, in partnership with Romine Elementary School, represented by Karen Greenlee Mr. Riggs made a motion to accept the new partnerships. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. C. SPECIAL PRESENT A TIO NS 1. Office of Desegregation Monitoring Skip Marshall had no formal report, but brought holiday greetings on behalf of the ODM staff. 2. Classroom Teachers Association Clementine Kelley attended the meeting representing the CT A. She had no formal report but brought season's greetings to the Board and administration. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page3 3. Joshua Intervenors No report. 4. Knight Intervenors No report. 5. PT A Council No report. D. BOARD MEMBERS Ms. Gee wished fellow Board members a happy holiday and thanked the student performers for their presentation. She encouraged everyone to move forward to become the best they can be. Dr. Daugherty expressed disappointment in the recent fire that occurred at Franklin Incentive School. He asked the Board to consider implementing a reward system to encourage citizens to come forward and name the person or persons responsible for this fire and other vandalism damage to District property. Ms. Magness thanked District staff members who responded promptly to the fire at Franklin\nmany people worked over the weekend to ensure that school could be in session Monday morning. She had recently attended the Forest Heights Junior High School Career Day activities. Ms. Magness thanked the student groups who performed at the recent Arkansas School Board's Association convention, and commended Marian Lacey for representing the District in a presentation at that same convention. She extended a special thank you to the Chamber of Commerce for inviting Board members to the recent annual meeting and luncheon. IV. CITIZENS COMMITTEES Jerry Cohen from MEMS Ambulance Service made a brief presentation highlighting some of the educational activities that MEMS provides for our students. Students are allowed to tour ambulances, and paramedics provide safety and educational activities to prevent drinking and driving. MEMS employees also work with the medical professions students at Metro to encourage further education in the paramedical field. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page4 V. REMARKS FROM CITIZENS Don Campbell asked the Board to respond to his presentation at the November Board meeting asking for assistance in allowing suspended and expelled students to make up their course work. V. ACTION AGENDA A. Dwight D. Eisenhower 1997-98 Professional Development Grant The Board was asked to approve maintenance of the December 1 submission of the 1997- 98 Title II, ESEA, D. D. Eisenhower grant proposal. Funding from this grant would provide professional development in math, science, and social studies activities in the amount of $141,798. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the submission. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. B. Adult Education Direct \u0026amp; Equitable Proposal A request to the Arkansas Department of Education for funding in the amount of $56,623 to serve educationally disadvantaged adults will be submitted upon approval by the Board. Mr. Riggs moved to approve the submission, seconded by Ms. Gee. The motion carried, 6-0. C. Adult Education Institutional/Correctional Proposal The Board was also asked to approve a grant submission to the Arkansas Department of Education in the amount of $56,241 to fund adult education services to institutionalized/ correctional adults. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the submission. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. D. Approval of AP Art History Course/Parkview Magnet The principal and staff of Parkview Magnet High School requested the Board's approval of the addition of an AP Art History course at Parkview beginning with the 1998-99 school year. The course would follow the curriculum established by the College Board and would compliment other visual arts specialty courses at Parkview. Dr. Anderson responded to questions from the Board. Mr. Riggs made a motion to approve the course. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page 5 E. Age Requirements for Compulsory Attendance Under the terms of Act 1230 of 1997, the enrollment age for students in Arkansas is set as five (5) years of age on or before September 15, instead of the current date of October 1. There is a provision in this act that allows school districts in the state having 50% or greater student population eligible to receive free or reduced lunches, to elect to use any other date between September 1 and October 1. Upon approval by the Board, the LRSD will file for this waiver to maintain the current enrollment date of October 1. Other Districts within Pulaski County have also elected to maintain the October 1 enrollment date. Mr. Riggs moved to approve submission of the waiver application. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. F. Grant Application: Arkansas Abstinence Education (Project FATE) G. Grant Application: Avon Kids Care Breast Cancer Awareness Crusade The Project FATE grant application would provide $35,000 for implementation of an early intervention program in sexual abstinence at Otter Creek Elementary School for 5th grade female students and their parents. Otter Creek is partnering with the Southwest Community Center and the McClellan Community School to implement this program. The Avon Breast Cancer Awareness and Education Grant requests $48,637 for the development of a program for female students at Forest Heights and Cloverdale Junior High Schools. The application would include a partnership with the city-wide Healthy Family Celebration, the Witness Project, the Encore Program at the YWCA, the American Cancer Society, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, the Arkansas Department of Health, CARTI, and St. Vincent's Infirmary Medical Center. Mr. Riggs requested that these two grant applications be approved by a combined motion. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. H. Waiver from State Standards for Senior High Athletic Eligibility A proposal, submitted by Ray Gillespie, Director of Athletics, petitions the Arkansas Department of Education to approve a waiver from recently adopted standards for academic requirements for participation in competitive interscholastic activities. The request for a waiver is to be filed with a plan to implement a supplemental instruction program for students who fall within the guidelines. That plan was presented in draft form for the Board's approval. Assistant Superintendent Victor Anderson was present to respond to questions from the Board. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve submission of the plan and waiver application. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page6 I. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to accept the donations, seconded by Mr. Riggs. The motion carried 6-0. Donated items are listed in the chart which follows. DONATIONS SCHOOLJDEP ARTMENT ITEM DONOR Bale Elementary NC Color Video Alan Robinette and Monitor and VCR Brentano's Bookstore Mabelvale Jr. High Seven office chairs Joy Ballard/Superior Federal Bank Rightsell Elementary Four NCR Computer Rodney Slater, Secretary of processors, monitors US Department of and keyboards Transoortation Parkview Magnet High School 23 pairs of tennis shoes Derrick Fisher/LA Lakers and LRSD Athletic Deot. through \"Skechers\" Mitchell Incentive School $1,000 for purchase of Wal-Mart, Inc. dance and drill team costumes Pulaski Heights Jr. High Microwave Oven A vis Mitchell Mabelvale Jr. High $50.00 gift certificate Wal-Mart/Baseline store $25 .00 gift certificate Wal-Mart/Landers store J. Personnel Changes The Board was asked to approve personnel items printed in the agenda. Mr. Riggs moved to accept the recommendations. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. K. Financial Reports Financial information for the month of November was presented in the Board agenda. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the reports as presented. Mr. Riggs seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING December 18, 1997 Page? VI. REPORT AGENDA Bond Fund Status Report As requested by the Board, a Bond Fund report was printed in the meeting agenda. Mark Milhollen was present to respond to questions from the Board. The Board asked Mr. Milhollen to provide additional information and a brief oral report at the next meeting. Desegregation Update As requested, the District enrollment report as of December 15, 1997, was printed in the agenda. Ms. Acre was present to respond to questions. She was asked to prepare an enrollment comparison as of October 1 for each year for the next meeting. Board Goals Update The Board goals were printed in the agenda. There was no additional discussion. VII. AUDIENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS None. VIII. DISCIPLINARY None. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 7: 15 p.m., Mr. Riggs made a motion to convene an executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The Board returned from executive session at 8:15 p.m. and reported that no action had been taken. ADJOURNMENT The Board adjourned at 8: 15 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Riggs, seconded by Dr. Mitchell. APPROVED: / - .\n\u0026gt;__~ -Cj 8\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":29,"next_page":30,"prev_page":28,"total_pages":362,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":336,"total_count":4341,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"worksheets","hits":2},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":4079},{"value":"StillImage","hits":389},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"South Carolina Council on Human Relations","hits":246},{"value":"Federal Bureau of Investigation","hits":186},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":112},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":106},{"value":"Scholarship, Education and Defense Fund for Racial Equality","hits":75},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":66},{"value":"United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation","hits":57},{"value":"Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (U.S.)","hits":52},{"value":"Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party","hits":50},{"value":"Huckaby, Elizabeth","hits":41}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":824},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":615},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":575},{"value":"Birmingham (Ala.)--Officials and employees--Biography","hits":567},{"value":"Birmingham (Ala.)--Politics and government--20th century","hits":567},{"value":"Civil rights movements--Alabama--Birmingham","hits":567},{"value":"Politicians--Alabama--Birmingham","hits":567},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":507},{"value":"African Americans--Arkansas","hits":455},{"value":"Civil rights--Arkansas","hits":454},{"value":"Race discrimination--Arkansas","hits":454}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":567},{"value":"McCain, James T.","hits":259},{"value":"Huckaby, Elizabeth","hits":89},{"value":"Simpson, John Milton Bryan, 1903-1987","hits":89},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":79},{"value":"Davis, L. O.","hits":78},{"value":"Hayling, Robert Bagner","hits":74},{"value":"Bryant, Farris, 1914-2002","hits":52},{"value":"Phillips, Vel, 1924-2018","hits":42},{"value":"Stuart, Virgil","hits":39},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":35}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":566},{"value":"Simpson, John Milton Bryan, 1903-1987","hits":89},{"value":"Davis, L. O.","hits":78},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":77},{"value":"Hayling, Robert Bagner","hits":74},{"value":"Bryant, Farris, 1914-2002","hits":52},{"value":"Phillips, Vel, 1924-2018","hits":42},{"value":"Stuart, Virgil","hits":39},{"value":"Ashmore, Harry S.","hits":34},{"value":"Brown, Robert R. (Robert Raymond), 1910-1994","hits":30},{"value":"Heiskell, John Netherland, 1872-1972","hits":30}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":246},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":167},{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":77},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":7},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":5},{"value":"Civil Rights Act of 1964","hits":3},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":2},{"value":"Integration of Clemson University","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1644},{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1603},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1212},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1146},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Jefferson County, Birmingham, 33.52066, -86.80249","hits":567},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":439},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":409},{"value":"United States, Florida, 28.75054, -82.5001","hits":373},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Dunbar High School, 34.73231, -92.28654","hits":206},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Central High School, 34.73683, -92.29895","hits":189},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, Forrest County, Hattiesburg, 31.32712, -89.29034","hits":86}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1728},{"value":"Alabama","hits":573},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":569},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":504},{"value":"Florida","hits":375},{"value":"Wisconsin","hits":84},{"value":"Georgia","hits":74},{"value":"New York","hits":42},{"value":"District of Columbia","hits":9},{"value":"Virginia","hits":9},{"value":"","hits":7}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1964","hits":957},{"value":"1963","hits":664},{"value":"1965","hits":513},{"value":"1962","hits":472},{"value":"1957","hits":462},{"value":"1960","hits":456},{"value":"1966","hits":444},{"value":"1961","hits":440},{"value":"1967","hits":440},{"value":"1995","hits":429},{"value":"1959","hits":420},{"value":"1994","hits":409},{"value":"1958","hits":401},{"value":"1996","hits":397},{"value":"1993","hits":384},{"value":"1969","hits":383},{"value":"1968","hits":359},{"value":"1992","hits":357},{"value":"1991","hits":355},{"value":"1999","hits":347},{"value":"1997","hits":344},{"value":"2000","hits":333},{"value":"1998","hits":326},{"value":"2001","hits":323},{"value":"1970","hits":319},{"value":"1990","hits":308},{"value":"1971","hits":295},{"value":"2002","hits":292},{"value":"1956","hits":278},{"value":"2003","hits":278},{"value":"1989","hits":277},{"value":"1972","hits":268},{"value":"1955","hits":259},{"value":"2004","hits":256},{"value":"2005","hits":237},{"value":"1954","hits":230},{"value":"1981","hits":225},{"value":"1974","hits":221},{"value":"1987","hits":215},{"value":"1988","hits":214},{"value":"1975","hits":205},{"value":"1973","hits":203},{"value":"1984","hits":203},{"value":"1986","hits":202},{"value":"1985","hits":201},{"value":"2006","hits":201},{"value":"1977","hits":197},{"value":"1980","hits":197},{"value":"1982","hits":197},{"value":"1983","hits":197},{"value":"1979","hits":195},{"value":"1976","hits":189},{"value":"1978","hits":189},{"value":"2007","hits":189},{"value":"1952","hits":158},{"value":"2010","hits":157},{"value":"1951","hits":156},{"value":"1953","hits":156},{"value":"2009","hits":154},{"value":"2008","hits":153},{"value":"2011","hits":153},{"value":"1950","hits":148},{"value":"2012","hits":144},{"value":"1948","hits":142},{"value":"2013","hits":142},{"value":"2014","hits":141},{"value":"1947","hits":139},{"value":"1945","hits":134},{"value":"1946","hits":134},{"value":"1944","hits":133},{"value":"1949","hits":133},{"value":"1943","hits":127},{"value":"1942","hits":121},{"value":"1934","hits":120},{"value":"1940","hits":120},{"value":"1932","hits":119},{"value":"1936","hits":119},{"value":"1937","hits":119},{"value":"1939","hits":119},{"value":"1933","hits":118},{"value":"1935","hits":117},{"value":"1941","hits":117},{"value":"1930","hits":116},{"value":"1938","hits":116},{"value":"1924","hits":113},{"value":"1931","hits":113},{"value":"1929","hits":99},{"value":"1921","hits":96},{"value":"1928","hits":93},{"value":"1923","hits":92},{"value":"1926","hits":92},{"value":"1927","hits":92},{"value":"1922","hits":91},{"value":"1925","hits":91},{"value":"1909","hits":89},{"value":"1918","hits":89},{"value":"1919","hits":89},{"value":"1920","hits":89},{"value":"1908","hits":88},{"value":"1911","hits":88}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1061","max":"2036","count":27224,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4341},{"value":"correspondence","hits":288},{"value":"notes (documents)","hits":97},{"value":"lists (document genres)","hits":89},{"value":"memorandums","hits":84},{"value":"postcards","hits":56},{"value":"programs (documents)","hits":47},{"value":"reports","hits":39},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":38},{"value":"pamphlets","hits":38},{"value":"essays","hits":37}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1880},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":1168},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":654},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":604},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":35},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":830},{"value":"Historical Manuscripts and Photographs","hits":764},{"value":"Theophilus Eugene ‘Bull’ Connor Papers, 1959-1963","hits":566},{"value":"Land of (Unequal) Opportunity: Documenting the Civil Rights Struggle in Arkansas","hits":454},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","hits":447},{"value":"Civil Rights Library of St. Augustine","hits":372},{"value":"James T. McCain papers, 1957-1972","hits":257},{"value":"New insights in the American civil rights movement: South Carolina Council on Human Relations records","hits":249},{"value":"Judy Richardson Papers 1963-2014","hits":92},{"value":"March on Milwaukee: Civil Rights History Project","hits":85},{"value":"Faith Holsaert Papers 1950-2011","hits":45}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1279},{"value":"University of Southern Mississippi. Libraries","hits":765},{"value":"Birmingham Public Library (Ala.)","hits":567},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":549},{"value":"University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Libraries","hits":454},{"value":"Proctor Library","hits":372},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":321},{"value":"Duke University. Library","hits":137},{"value":"Golda Meir Library. Special Collections","hits":85},{"value":"Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library","hits":49},{"value":"Valdosta State University. Odum Library. Archives and Special Collections","hits":15}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":4326},{"value":"Collection","hits":15}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":4335},{"value":"true","hits":6}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}