Little Rock School District I APR 2 0 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring PRELIMINARY FACILITIES STUDY A SPECIAL REPORT SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MARCH 17, 1995 BY DIRECTOR OF FACILITY SERVICES PRELIMINARY FACILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS MARCH 15, 1995 I I TOPIC PAGE 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. GENERAL DISCUSSION 3 III. CONCLUSION 17 IV. RECOMMENDATION 21 ENCLOSURE PAGE ZONE DESCRIPTION ENCLOSURE #1 FACILITY ASSESSMENT SURVEY ENCLOSURE #2 UPDATED FACILITY COSTS ENCLOSURE #3 OCTOBER 1, 1994 ENROLLMENT ENCLOSURE #4 LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT ENCLOSURE #5 {I 1) I 1 u f. 2) irP I II PRELIMINARY FACILITY STUDY LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MARCH 15, 1995 OBJECTIVES OF THE STDDY This Preliminary Facility Study is to provide general information to the Superintendent and staff regarding an assessment of our facilities. It is intended to be used to determine a general impact on the community of school utilization. The study is a forerunner to the in depth Facility Study to be completed over the next six (6) months. and is intended, solely, to provide preliminary information for which general trends, assumptions and directions may be derived. The study approaches the facts primarily from a planning standpoint and looks at two (2) general areas: Facilities (their age, condition and operational costs) and. Student and Population Demographics of the City. The assessments and recommendations drawn from these two (2) areas provide generalizations within the study perimeters. METHODOLOGY The methodology of this Preliminary Study is essentially to draw together raw data concerning facilities and demographics, use a generic measure for identifying the specific study areas, display these in a matrix, and in an overall fashion, evaluate the facilities. The demographic data was drawn on two (2) levels: 1) Student Populations and Capacities over the last seven (7) years kindergarten enrollment trends over the last five (5) years and, 2) General Demographic Trends within the City of Little Rock. A) Demographics In studying the demographics, the City was divided into fourteen (14) general areas. These general areas, as identified on Enclosure #1, are neighborhood groupings which are drawn along predominant geographic features dividing neighborhoods and try to encompass, or align, as closely with census tracts and attendance zones as possible. The purpose for dividing the City into these thirteen (13) sections was primarily so that a smaller number of demographic areas and groupings of schools could be dealt with. Since there is no exact correlation between attendance zones for our schools and zone blocks for census purposes, the neighborhood delineation is considered a reasonable demarkation line. General analysis of demographic data will be based on the students attending the schools within these fourteen (14) zones and the demographics of the census blocks within the same zones. It should be pointed out that the basis of this philosophy is simply that all the children in this identifiable area are school children within the 1i system and are considered only in relationship to the closest school and not the school they attend. This appears to discount the issue of bussing, but for the limited purposes of this study, allows us to look at school-age children in relation to demographics and in relation to the closest school they could possibly attend were they assigned to an area school. B) Facilities Facilities were analyzed by looking at eighteen (18) separate areas and grouping those areas (5) general as shown on the Matrix 2). The areas of into five Facilities categories (Enclosure #2) . consideration within the general titles are as follows: 1) Site i Considers size of facility and acreage, its location, and aannaallyyssiiss of the play area, the parking and drives. 2) II II II Renovation: Considers maintenance and repair work in four (4) general areas: (3) Roofing. Exterior Building (1) HVAC (2) Flooring Construction and, (4) II 3) Oporades support An upgrade is considered "new work" to academic programs and consists of an evaluation of the administrative areas, classrooms and trailers. (See Enclosure #3). lighting. and restroom facilities 4) General Support Consists of an evaluation of the fire alarm system, the energy management system, the security, to include building integrity and Americans with Disabilities Act Requirements, and cafeteria and kitchen. 5) Operational Costs Operational costs considers all elementary schools as being equal and weighs them against the average student cost, regardless of the school pprrooggrraamm.. Numbers above five (5) indicate operational average. costs below District-wide DCE/rlh/facstu 2 BS GENERAL DISCUSSION: l ZONE A Zone A is in the northwest corner of the City of Little Rock and includes Terry and Fulbright Elementary Schools. An analysis of Fulbright Elementary School shows that it rides above the District-wide average. in siting and renovation costs Its high scores indicate that few renovations are required and adequate site facilities are available. Upgrading costs are also high indicating that no new additions need to be made to the school at this time. Its general support figures are also slightly above average with only the need for an energy management system bringing the score down. Its total evaluation shows that it ranks above the average schools in the District. Terry Elementary School is comparable to Fulbright in that there is sufficient property available for expansion, and it is one of the most cost-efficient schools per capita to operate in the District. capacity of Zone A is 1,055 students. The total The enrollment in '94-'95 was 1,110 with the difference being compensated for by trailers at both Fulbright and Terry Elementary Schools. The demographic analysis indicates that this area of population expanded an average of sixty-two percent (62%) between 1980 and 1990. This is also supported by the growth in kindergarten-eligible children between 1988 and 1994 . Growth in this area has been primarily singlefamily dwellings with some apartments. It can reasonably be expected that growth in this area will continue over the next ten (10) years. Although bordered on the north by the physical restriction of the Arkansas River, further expansion west along the main corridor of Highway 10 will allow for further development, both residential and commercial. This is an area that will warrant close observation over the next couple of years. At present, we have maxed out the capacity of- the two (2) elementary schools in this area, and given the anticipated growth based on the I record of growth between 1980 and 1990, we can reasonably expect that additions may have to be made to Terry Elementary School and Fulbright Elementary School, or a 111 new school constructed to meet the growing demands of this part of the city. ZONE B This zone includes Jefferson, Williams Magnet Elementary Schools, slightly east of Zone A. Brady, McDermott and and is located ( Jefferson Elementary School would be considered an 3 I average elementary school with an overall evaluation of five (5), its weakest areas being the upgrade costs for the facilities needed to enhance its academic programs. Its operational are below the District-wide costs and there is the average, sufficient property should expansion be needed at this school. an Brady Elementary School is rated slightly above average. Its upgrading costs to expand much needed academic is its lowest score. There is sufficient property there to also expand this school if it were necessary. areas McDermott Elementary School is considered to be a better- than-average school. Its low operating costs make this a very efficient facility to run. There is property for additional expansion, but this may be done at the of much-needed playground and parking space. expense Williams Elementary School is one of the least efficient to operate on a per capita basis. This is due, in large part, to the amount of money spent in the magnet program to support these children. Its average score in renovation and upgrades are due to a backlog of maintenance and repair that are necessary at this school. There is sufficient space for expanding this school should it be justified. Throughoutthe period of 1980-1990, this part of Little Rock exhibited a slight decrease in population of About one percent (1%). The numbers of eligible kindergarten children remain relatively constant from 1988 to 1994 with a sharp decrease between 1991 and 1994. The area is an older section of town which is relatively stable, and a^transient population out does not predominate in this The zone has the capacity to seat 1,993 children, and in 1994-1995, 1,878 were enrolled. This indicates that there is some seating available in this area. area. 1,878 were enrolled. ZONE C Zone C is in the north central part of Little Rock and includes Forest Park, Fair Park, Woodruff and Pulaski Heights Elementary Schools. Forest Park Elementary School, because of its size and enrollment, is one of the cheapest operational schools in the District. its average scores in renovation and upgrade are due to the backlog of maintenance and its low score in site is because it is land-locked, and there is capability to expand this facility. no Its overall evaluation makes it slightly above the average. Fair Park Elementary School is an average school to operate, but ranks below average because of the extremely 4IT r ( low ratings in its site, general support. its upgrade costs, and its Park Analysis in Enclosure #3. I direct your attention to the Fair Fair Park has serious handicaps due to the backlog of maintenance and the fact that the school cannot be expanded beyond its present Trailers at this site are allowing the District to meet the minimum educational needs at this time. The school is an average school as far as efficiency goes, but there are three (3) areas that rank capabilities. below average, not including its overall ranking. Woodruff Elementary School is in the southern part of Zone C. It is considered an average school with a slightly above average operating cost. Its low ranking in siting is because the facility is land-locked and expansion beyond its present bounds is impossible without further acquisition of property. It is considered an average school as far as renovation and upgrade concerned. However, there are serious areas that should be attended to (see Enclosure #4). is The small classroom size at Woodruff makes this school a serious candidate for close scrutiny in future years. ' ilLl, maintain the statewide average class size due to small classrooms makes this school over-staffed in relation to students as compared to other schools. The inability to Pulaski Heights Elementary School, close to the central portion of Zone 3, is an older school, but is extremely cost efficient to operate. Its overall ranking is above average with only renovation costs being below average, and this is due to the backlog of maintenance and repair. Pulaski Heights, too, is land-locked, and even though the site is considered average, there is little to no room to expand beyond the present trailers that are located there. The lack of parking space and trafficability hamper this school, and it has probably been maxed out at its current size. During the period of 1980 to 1990, this area exhibited a slight decrease-in population of approximately one point five percent (1.5%). This is in slight contrast to the kindergarten-age children between 1988 and This could indicate a slight rise in births as opposed to an influx of people. A change in percent is probably attributed to older home-dwellers selling their property and moving out, and young home-dwellers having more children. 1994. Zone C is a relatively stable area in Little Rock, there is little room for expansion. as There are no large nor parks that can be redeveloped. parks that are available vacant lots. The are necessary green areas to 5 AZONE D support residential communities. Zone D is the inner core, intercity area of Little Rock. It includes Mitchell, Rightsell, M.L. King, Gibbs Magnet, Rockefeller and Washington Elementary Schools. It is, essentially, that area bounded on the east by 1-630, on the south by the city limits, on the west by the railroad tracks, and on the north by the Arkansas River, includes the large office and commercial area of downtown It is, It Little Rock. Because it is the core of the city, it has the oldest facilities. and those requiring the most upkeep, addition to being the smallest and most inefficient to run. in Mitchell Elementary School is an extremely small, old school. The District has put a vast amount of money into this school to maintain it as called for under the Desegregation Plan. Overall, this school is one of the most costly to operate in the District with its operating costs approximately thirty-four percent (34%) above the District-wide average. This, in part, is due to the funding necessary to support incentive schools. However, all of these schools, for the purpose of this study, are treated equally. Its low scores in site, upgrading and general support are due to its location and the This, tremendous backlog of maintenance and repair, and diw things necessary to bring it up to the standards of and those Year 2000 school. a Its overall rating is below the District-wide average. Mitchell Elementary School's most noted handicap is its inability to expand, or its adaptation into a modern school. Although it can its inability to expand. Although it accommodate the essential programs at this time, __ _ difficult to determine, with the change in the academic programs, whether or not the school will be able to it is maintain its viability as a school building, small, expensive to operate, and it lacks expansion capability. as It is and it limited Rightsell Elementary School, built at approximately the same time, is also a very inefficient school to operate. Its operating costs, too, are extremely high, being over thirty percent _ (30%) of the District average, attributable to incentive school costs. in Its low scores site and upgrading are due to the fact that this school, too, is land-locked and has limited space for expansion, and limited space to meet its current needs. too. The upgrade costs consists of those costs to bring this school in line with the Twentieth (20th) Century, overall ranking of below average is an accumulation of the aforementioned. Rightsell Elementary School, like Mitchell,is a beautiful old building, but has probably outlived its usefulness as an elementary school. Its It most 6I L certainly has viability and consideration for commercial or administrative capability, but due to perceived or unknown changes in academic programs, its viability as an elementary school is very questionable. M.L. King Elementary School, slightly difficult to analyze. completed in 1993, is It is considered to be an average operating cost which is in excellent physical condition. It, virtually, has no backlog of maintenance and repair, and its overall rating is one of the highest in the District. ' ' at this capacity. time, it It has capability for expansion, and, is running below its authorized Gibbs Elementary School, inefficient standpoint. schools to also, run is from one an of the most operational again, because of the cost of the magnet Its high scores in upgrading and site indicate that it has the capability of expansion and is fairly well maintained. - - - program. It lacks for nothing except media space, and its backlog of maintenance and repair is as indicated in Enclosure #3. It has an overall rating right at the District-wide average. Rockefeller Elementary School is another extremely costly school to operate. The amount of money to support this program makes the per capita charge extremely high, facility, itself, is in relatively good shape. __ ____ for nothing to meet its academic needs, and its backlog of maintenance and repair centers around the need for a The It Jacks new heating/ventilation system. adequate with possibilities for expansion, overall rating is above the School District Its site is considered and its average. Washington Elementary School is efficient school a to operate approximately five percent with relatively cost- its (5%) below the costs being District average. Its high scores in site renovation and upgrade costs indicate that the school lacks for nothing to meet its academic ndeds. It is maintained very well, and there sufficient grounds to conduct the present academic program. Its overall score is one of the higher is in the District. Zone D has exhibited a population approximately twenty-three point two percent decrease of between 1980 ad 1990. (23.2%) This is due, in large part, to a moving population, probably, within the City of Little Rock. It is, generally, an older area, with an older. average age population, and a decreasing birth rate. This would be indicated by the kindergarten availability figures between 1988 and 1994 showing a decrease in 7kindergarten-aged children which, in this case, I believe is commensurate with the decrease in population in that families of childbearing age are relocating out of this area. This trend has continued for at least ten (10) years, and unless something is done on the part of the City, or by private industries. to stabilize population, this is likely to occur in the future. the As families move out, close scrutiny must be paid to the schools in this area. At the present time, we have the capacity to seat 2,942 children, and in 1994-1995, our enrollment was 2,435, or a difference of over five ZONE E hundred (500) students. extremely close scrutiny. This is an area that requires and serious consideration should be made at this time to realign these schools due to the perceived decrease in population and lessening of school-aged children. Zone E is an area located to the east of the inter city immediately east of 1-630. Magnet Elementary Schools. It includes Booker and Carver Booker Magnet Elementary School, because of its magnet status, is also extremely costly to operate. Its overall evaluation is at the District-wide average, and this is predominantly because the school is in relatively good shape, but has some deficiencies in the general support area, predominantly a weakness in the energy management and fire alarm systems. Carver Magnet Elementary School is also very costly to operate. condition. This school is considered to be in excellent Except for minor upgrades necessary to enhance the media center, all other areas are far above the District-wide evaluation. average to include its overall During 1980 to 1990, this area exhibited a sixteen point two percent (16.2%) decrease in population. The trend has been toward an out migration as children complete school and a lack of expansion because of the airport and industrial facilities on the east and south part of this zone. 1,269 children. The area has the capacity of seating The 1994-1995 enrollment was 1,161 for a difference of over one hundred (100) seats. The slight decrease in population is mirrored by the decrease in available kindergarten children between 1988 and 1994. Although east Little Rock, to include Zone F discussed below. together have a great potential for further development. This has not been the case in the last ten (10) years. The industrial development and expansion of the airport has had a tendency to have a negative effect on residential movement within this area except to leave the area. The lack of an area school in Zone E complimented by the small shadows of Carver is probably 8 sufficient to meet our current needs. sutticient However, this area also requires close scrutiny over the next couple of years. ZONE F Zone F is the far eastern part of the city between the southern city limits and the Arkansas River and bordered on the west by the airport. There is one elementary school in this area, Badgett Elementary School. Badgett Elementary School has an extremely high operating cost for the number of students. In addition, serious upgrades are needed to bring this school in line with Twentieth {20th) Century standards. Its average ranking in renovation indicates that it has serious maintenance li M and repair problems, as do other schools in the District. Its general support and site evaluations are slightly above the average, with the most detrimental being the lack of a modern fire alarm system, and its low rating in cafeteria capabilities. Its overall evaluation of four (4) ranks with a couple of other schools as being the lowest in the District. n M n II During the period of 1980 to 1990, this portion of Little Rock exhibited the greatest decrease in population, that being thirty-eight percent (38%). Although this was predicted to be a growth area in the 1980 census, the lack of home-sites, its remoteness from the inner city area, its lack of city services such as bussing, and the expansion of the airport have led to a general decrease in residential home-sites around Badgett Elementary The zone has a seating capacity of 257, and in 1994, 177 children were enrolled. This is compared to the kindergarten-aged children identified between 1988 School. and 1994. II II Although there is a slight increase, there is a serious decrease between 1990 and 1994, indicating that the trend in the last five (5) years has been an out migration, or a serious lowering of the birth rate due to the increasing age of remaining inhabitants. My preliminary analysis as a planner is that Zone F will continue to become more industrialized in the future. inhabitants. This form of economy has gotten a foot-hold in the south and east part of Zone E and has extended through Zone F, culminating with the Little Rock Port which was constructed on the eastern area of Zone F. indicate a general trend to expand this predominantly commercial property. This would area into ( The Little Rock School District would be well wise to watch this area. A small, inefficiently run school in an area with sharp decreasing population and very little hope for a change in demographic settlement patterns would necessitate that this school be considered for 9a closure. ZONE G a Zone G is on the far western side of the City of Little Rock and includes only Romine Elementary School. It is, essentially, an area west of John Barrow Road to the city limits. Romine Elementary School is extremely costly to operate and is one of the least cost-efficient schools of It is, a all the District's area schools. Its average ratings in renovation and upgrade are as a result of monies put into that school to meet the interdistrict concept over the last couple of years. Yet, it was not sufficient to raise it above the District-wide a average. Zone G has a seating capacity of 487 students, and the a '94-'95 enrollment was 323, capacity. indicating ample seating a The most promising note of this area is the population growth between 1980 and 1990 of approximately twenty percent 20%) . This is also reflected by the availability of kindergarten students which, after taking a sharp decrease in 1989, has risen above its 1988 level. This, as compared to a steady decreasing enrollment from 1988 to 1994, would indicate that persons moving into this area are not attending Romine Elementary School, but rather are going to other LRSD schools, or private schools. (20%). Although there are no significant shortfalls at Romine which would necessitate serious consideration for either closure or expansion of this school, close monitoring is necessary to insure that this school is attracting its fair share of inhabitants. " school. Being an interdistrict part of the decrease in enrollment must be attributed not so much to the lack of area students going to this school, but a lack of interdistrict students being transferred in. but a lack of interdistrict students ZONE H Zone H is a small area immediately to the east of Barrow Road. It includes Wilson and Bale Elementary Schools. Wilson Elementary School is right at the District-wide Road. Its low ranking and general support is due primarily to its lack of an energy monitoring system and its low rating in security, ADA and cafeteria average. low capabilities. security. and as far as It is right at the District-wide average operational cost is concerned, and is considered about average as ... ' maintenance and its need for expanded facilities. far as its backlog of Bale Elementary School is above the District's operating costs at approximately eight percent (8%). rating of average is primarily because the Its overall site is 10enhanced because of its location and work done over the last couple of years, its decrease in backlog of maintenance, and its average ratings in general support. The site has the capability for expansion and can be enhanced quite easily. Between 1980 and 1990, this area exhibited a decrease in population of approximately two point six percent (2.6%). This is not reflected in the numbers of kindergarten children during this period of time of 1988 to 1994. Although there was a decrease in 1990, there was a sharp increase in 1991, and it has remained at least constant over the last couple of years. The area itself lacks the ability to expand because of green areas immediately to the west. The change in population is probably due to an out migration of elderly inhabitants not completely countered by relocations into the area of people of childbearing age. The zone has the capacity to seat 795 students, and in '94-'95, had an enrollment of 654. This means there appears to be some capacity available in these schools. Both of the schools have exhibited a I decline in enrollment over the last five (5) to six (6) years to their present enrollment figures. Because of I the relative stability of this area, and the rationale between out-migration of older people, these schools can expect to either level off or have slightly decreasing populations in the next couple of years. ! ZONE I Zone I is an area to the west of the inner city and includes Franklin, Garland and the recently removed Stephens Elementary School. Franklin Elementary School is one of the least cost- efficient schools to run, primarily due to the monies spent to support the incentive program. ratings in renovation indicate that there is a backlog of maintenance and repair of significant items, and its Its average slightly above average ratings in siting and upgrading are due to work necessary in those areas to support the academic program. Overall, it ranks right at the District average. Garland Elementary School is one of the most costly schools in the District to operate, due largely, in part, to its decreasing numbers and high per capita cost to support the incentive school considered extremely poor and program. is Its commented site on is in Enclosure #3, as is the renovation and upgrading costs. Its overall ranking is below the District average. Zone I, between 1980 and 1990, showed a decrease in population of approximately eighteen percent (18%). The District has a seating capacity, without Stephens Elementary 11School, of 732, and in 1994-1995, enrolled 725 students. We must remember in considering Zone I that Stephens Elementary School Children have been absorbed in surrounding schools, primarily Franklin and Garland. Some children have been moved to other areas. This number is available from Student Assignments. Generally speaking, this area is showing a sharp decrease in population, and this is mirrored by the decrease in availability of kindergarten-aged children between 1988 and 1994. When Stephens was removed and the District had the capability to absorb the other children in its existing schools, it showed that available seating is prevalent to allow the District to make closures a consideration in trying to balance student populations to demographic needs. Zone I is immediately adjacent to Zone D discussed previously. A comparison should be made in demographics between Zone I and Zone D which, together, would show a decrease in population. This is serious and should warrant the District to re-look at its attendance zones in this area and its need for the number of schools to meet the future growth, or lack thereof, in the central core area. II ZONE J: Zone J is in the north part of southwest Little Rock. It includes Meadowcliff, Western Hills and Dodd Elementary Schools. II Meadowcliff Elementary School is a very cost-efficient school to operate. Enhancements this last year in the heating / air conditioning system have lowered our bill II substantially. Its overall ranking of above average is due, primarily, to its low operating costs, its expansive site and its decrease in the backlog of maintenance and repair. II Although there are some items identified in Enclosure #3 as being necessary to support the academic program, it average facility. is generally considered to be an above fl Western Hills Elementary School is also considered above average, and is less costly to operate. All the areas viewed rank above the District-wide average due, largely in part, to major renovations completed in 1991. Dodd Elementary School, in far west Little Rock, is one of the least costly schools in the District to operate. Its total evaluation of seven (7) ranks the highest, and that's due, in large part, to the positive ratings in the general support areas and its low operating costs. There is room on the site to expand, and only minor renovations and upgrades are necessary to keep the school in line 12I I with current academic needs. This zone, between 1980 and 1990, showed a decrease of approximately ten percent (10%) in population. tracks very closely to the stabilized population between This 1988 and 1994. Although there were slight peaks in the number of kindergarten-aged children, it has remained. essentially, the same. The zone has the capacity to seat 1,121 children, and the 1994-1995 enrollment was 1,026. The slight decrease in population is primarily because of the lack of development in this area as most of the effort has been in west Little Rock, north of this zone. It is anticipated that in the out years, development into Pulaski County, along the 1-430 corridor, could cause a substantial in the numbers of school-aged children and families. All of these schools possess the capability to be expanded to some degree, and observation increase M of population trends is warranted adequate seating in the out years. so as to insure ZONE K II Zone K is in the northeast corner of southwest Little Rock. It includes Wakefield and Geyer Springs Elementary Schools. II Wakefield Elementary School is one of the more cost- efficient schools to operate however. its overall II evaluation and District average is due to the need to upgrade this school to meet academic standards and its relatively low scores in its general support areas (primarily, in its lack of an energy management system and its low scores in * II adaptability). fire alarm system and ADA II Geyer Springs Elementary higher in the District. School ranks as one of the the It is slightly below District-wide average to operate and has an extremely high score in its ability to meet the academic standards II because of its upgrades in 1992. Its low backlog of maintenance and repair and its attractive site make this one of the better schools in the District. Zone K exhibited a decrease of six point five percent (6.5%) in its population between 1980 and 1990. This is countered by a sharp increase between 1988 and 1994 of kindergarten-aged children. This would indicate a migration out of elderly families countered by a birth rate of families of child-bearing age. The zone has the M capacity to seat 820 students, and in 1993-1994, had an enrollment of 713. Even though each school has shown a decrease in population over the last couple of years. a M change could be expected if the numbers of kindergarten children rise as they have in the last couple of years. 13 ZONE L Zone L is in the far, southwest corner of Little Rock. It includes only Otter Creek Elementary School. It is that area to the east and north of 1-630 and 1-430. ZONE M Otter Creek Elementary School is one of the least costly schools to operate in the District. This fact, coupled with its low backlog of maintenance and repair. its attractive site and its lack of need to support its educational program rank this schools in the District. as one of the higher Zone L had a population increase of approximately eleven point six percent (11.6%) between 1980 and 1990. kindergarten-aged children have constant throughout this period of time. The remained relatively The school has enjoyed a relatively stable enrollment over the last couple of years and is slightly above its capacity. Attractive home-sites and neighborhood communities in this area make this a potentially expansive area in the future however, it is severely limited in that it is up against the city limits and restricted by the interstate. Possible commercial and industrial development along the interstate will probably restrict residential development in this area, hence, I would estimate that the population will remain relatively constant over the next couple of years. Zone M is the largest land area and comprises most of southwest Little Rock. It includes Mabelvale, Chicot, Watson and Cloverdale Elementary Schools. II Mabelvale Elementary School is slightly below the District-wide average to operate, hence its above average score. Its ability to expand, its lower than average II backlog of maintenance and repair, and lack of need of work to meet its academic program make this school slightly above the District average. II Chicot Elementary School was evaluated as if the building was completed based on the current design. It is anticipated that Chicot would be about an average operating cost because of the new mechanical systems, but there would be increases in the scores dealing with its site, its renovations, and upgrades. consider this to be an above average school. Hence, we would n n n Watson Elementary School is also an above average school. Its slightly below average operating costs, coupled with its above average evaluation of its site, renovations and upgrades counter the deficiencies in its general support areas which, predominantly, are the lack of an energy 14I management system and a low score in ADA adaptability. Cloverdale Elementary School, with its enhancements in 1992, make this one of the more cost-efficient schools to operate. average Its overall evaluation is above the District and this is due, largely in part, to its I enhancements in the general support area, its expansive site and its low backlog of maintenance and repair and need for additional academic areas. I Between 1980 and 1990, Zone M exhibited a decrease in population of approximately eight point seven percent (8.7%) . This is not reflected in its I kindergarten-aged children between 1988 and 1994. increase of This I could be due, largely in part, to the large number of single-family dwellings and apartments in this area which give lead to the settlement of inter-district movement in that single-parent families with small children could be relocating into this area and the larger, more stabilized families are moving out. This zone has the capacity to seat 2,057 students, and in 1994-1995, had an enrollment of 1,796, which leaves ample room for expansion. these schools has exhibited a slight decrease Each of in population over the last couple of years. This is commensurate with elementary school children being at a higher number than the numbers of new kindergarten students. I This area is quite expansive and services a large square mile area. Consideration of evaluating these schools in conjunction with the schools identified in Zone N is plausible because of population in southwest Little Rock. the low-density ZONE N Zone N is the eastern portion of southwest Little Rock. It includes only Baseline Elementary School. Baseline Elementary School is below the District-wide average in as far I overall above average. as operating costs and is ranked Its average site conditions are countered by its. lack of need for maintenance and repair, and its lack of need for additional areas to meet its academic programs. During the period 1980 to 1990, Zone N exhibited a population decrease of approximately ten point two percent (10.2%) . This, also. is countered by the increase in kindergarten-aged children between 1988 and 1994 . Generally, as was the case with Zone M, southwest Little Rock has exhibited an increase of families with small children. The general decrease in population over the last ten (10) years is not likely to be reflected in the 1990 to 2000 census if the number of kindergarten- aged children is an indicator of population growth. The 15I I zone has a seating capacity of 3 90, and its enrollment in 1994-1995 was 326. The school has been showing a decrease in enrollment over the last five (5) to six (6) years. This may indicate an increase in availability of kindergarten children, but they are not attending this school. I I I I I I 16 IGENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I 1. CONCLUSIONS An analysis of the limited demographic data and interpretation of kindergarten enrollment and general trends indicate that the City of Little Rock is not exhibiting movement patterns unlike the current nationwide trends. As was stated in the 1988 Facility Study demographic data indicates that the population of core areas of many cities are declining, and residents are moving to the outskirts of the city and into suburban areas. Despite inmigration, the total enrollment in most given areas of the inner cities has declined. II Current nationwide are at work". In Little Rock, similar factors Demographic data completed in 1990 indicates that the perceptions in the 1988 study were correct, but not The perceived movement and settlement in the west entirely. part of the city has been due, both to the population shift and the subsequent annexation of property by the City of Little Rock. ' - - The decline of the inner city area and the movement of persons of child-bearing age out of this area was also foreseen in 1988 and verified with the census completed in 1990. The assumption of further development in east Little Rock predicted in the 1988 study has not come about as of yet. Further industrial development has probably been the factor in negating residential increases in this area. There is insufficient data to explain the decrease in population in southwest Little Rock. It could possibly be that southwest Little Rock is becoming, perhaps blacker in its population density, and that there is an out-migration of whites, but this is only an assumption. Sufficient data is not available to draw this conclusion. Regardless of the reasons, the School District must recognize that there is a changing face to the demographics of the City of Little Rock and that the simple movement of populations is causing a polarization at both the social and socio-economic levels. I would question whether or not the District's responsibility is to overly react to that polarization, but As we rather react to the impact on the educational process. strive to meet our desegregation goals, it sometimes causes us to look past our educational requirements as being more important than trying to desegregate each of our facilities. We should also recognize that population movement will not only be reflected in the schools, but will also be reflected in the communities. Businesses and churches are examples of enterprises that will become polarized and reflect their neighborhood. This, neighborhood concept. in itself. is the foundation of the If the District appears to be reacting counter to the neighborhood concept by offering educational 17 opportunities in old neighborhoods, resisted by all levels of the population, security^ to stay at home, in the community, in familiar surroundings with friends, will predominate and will negate voluntarily moving just because seats are available in schools. they are going to be seats The sense of group of schools together in If the District antagonizes this process by moving children for desegregation purposes, it creates a false impression of where the vacancies are within the District. Subsequently, the method of analyzing a <_ _ __L__1_ relation_to the surrounding community is a viable approach to rmining required capacities and gives more credit to the demographic data. I In conclusion, I believe it is possible for the District to meet its goals and objectives of being the primary educator for the city and be able to continually strive towards a desegregated educational atmosphere as long as it determines the aspects of the society that it can control. The School District will not necessarily be an attractor for people to move into certain areas as much as it will be a detractor if the schools are associated with unsafe or declining communities. or to The School The issue of bussing is difficult to factor in when only doing Moving students, because they elect to go to a school, e., a magnet or incentive, or interdistrict, for the purpose of trying to racially balance a school add to the complexity of where there is existing space within the District. If children in a given zone are clustered in the schools in that zone, the issue of bussing would have to be re-looked only in light of general racial balance as it would be interpreted that children attending schools closer to home would be their preference. a preliminary report. i.e., If children a a I When we factor in the issue of financial stability, operating costs and general age and condition of the facilities, we must group together our zones so that a more equitable spread of students and resources can be achieved. For that purpose, recommendations are based on a larger grouping of zones. The 1988 Facility Study indicated ----------------------------------------------------------------J J, in part, that the District should weigh the prudence of spending large sums of money to conse^e buildings with limited enrollment and less adequate facilities as against providing larger schools with superior facilities that can be staffed so there is room to work and the extensive specialized staff would be fully utilized, statement holds true today even more so because of the shifting populations and the additional age of the buildings. That The opportunity exists within the District to consolidate 18 schools in a much more efficient manner of utilization. to possibly construct new schools to give decaying areas better educational facilities, and to consider expanding schools to meet the demographic needs. It is this tie-in that would join our decreasing enrollments, decaying facilities with our future facility needs. This Preliminary Study did not include an indepth analysis of the District's administrative facilities. - The District has numerous special-purpose facilities to house its Facilities Services Directorate, Directorate of Procurement and Materials Management Services, Safety and Security Department, Food Services Department, and Transportation Department. remainder of the District's administrative functions performed at the Board of Education building. The are its Annex, Student Assignments Office, and the Instructional Resource Center. I Although not an administrative facility, an analysis was not made of the Adult Education Facility or Alternative Learning Center. with regard to the special-purpose administrative areas, such as Facilities Services and Transportation, require enhancements to meet their operational needs. current they may well and future With regard to the administrative space, a more indepth utilization survey should be made of both the administration building and the annex. A survey done in early 1980 indicated that the annex was no longer needed, and the School Board elected to excess this property. At the present time, is only occupied at approximately seventy-five percent (75%). The building, located in the close proximity to the Board of Education Building, appears to be a renovated it warehouse with no windows and limits on its expansion, addition, there is no off-street parking. In The administrative building appears to be able to meet the current needs of exception of the Board Room. the existing staff. with the possible The rise and increase over the last couple of years in the Little Rock School District educational matters-.has many times caused a serious overcrowding in the Board Room. Perhaps an examination could be made as to whether or not this portion of the building could be expanded. The Little Rock School District currently leases a building at the corner of 6th and Ringo for the Instructional Resource Center. This organization was previously housed in the Lee Elementary School which has since been closed and excessed by The principal reason for relocating the the District. organization was to put them in a safer, more viable facility. However, the cost to run the IRC exceeds $160,000 in facility costs alone. consideration should be given to Serious relocating the IRC and terminating this lease if further 19initiatives are taken to close schools as indicated in the following Recommendation Section. Many of the Little Rock School District schools which are being recommended for closing could possibly be adapted to house the Instructional Resource Center. This would be done at a savings to the District of at least the lease cost. 20L ( 2 . RECOMMENDATIONS In analyzing Zones I and D together, we find a very serious problem in that we have the worst combination of decreasing enrollment and decaying facilities. schools are located in this section of town, Our oldest and where our population decrease is the highest. Additionally, these areas are predominantly black. If we capitalize on the decreasing enrollment by consolidating schools which are under-utilized. or by replacing worn-out facilities with new modern facilities, we have an attempt at accomplishing the best of both worlds in that we would be providing modern, up-to-date facilities with better educational predominantly minority areas. programs in our We would also be decreasing our overall operating costs by building better-utilized, energyefficient facilities. As such, assessing I would recommend that the District consider re- its attendance zones around the old Stephens Elementary School, such that zones would be consolidated to include the children of Stephens, Elementary Schools into a new facility. Garland, and Mitchell Neither Mitchell nor Garland possess the capabilities to be expanded to re-seat the displaced Stephens children. As indicated in the individual sheets, the sites are not adequate and the facilities require far too much work to be expanded. The opportunity exists to build a new, modern, up-to-date school,with a capacity of as high as 700 (if this meets the enrollment zone predictions). We would then, upon completion of this school and relocating the students, dispose of the Garland and Mitchell properties. My further recommendation would be to attempt to sell the Mitchell property as it most assuredly could be used, or renovated into apartment housing or office space, and that Garland be sold in the same manner. I would further recommend that consideration be given to closing Rightsell Elementary School and that children in this area, if it can be agreed upon by the parties, be assigned to the new Martin Luther King Elementary School or possibly Rockefeller Elementary School. M.L. King, although an interdistrict school, has not been completely utilized. If there IS not a serious increase in the number of inter-district white children into the school within the very near future, the school will be continued to be operated at approximately seventy-six percent (76%) of its capacity. This would appear to be a contradiction to the desegregation goals in that we would be deliberately creating a predominantly black school. But the issue here deals with the limited success of King as an inter-district school and the needs of the children in the surrounding area. If King will not accommodate all of the children in the Rightsell attendance zone, then consideration should be given to expanding Rockefeller Elementary School to make the additional accommodations. I 21In examining Zones E and F, we find a predominantly commercial area that has not developed as per the expectations and predictions of the mid '8O's. The one area school in this area, Badgett Elementary School, is very much under-utilized and extremely cost-inefficient to operate. If the area does not show any promises of further residential development, I would recommend that this school be considered for closure and that an examination be made of both Booker and Carver Elementary Schools to determine if the expansion of a shadowzone to Carver, and the initiation of a shadow-zone to Booker would not accommodate the children in this location. Again, this is capitalizing on the present capacity rates of ninety- six percent (96%) and eighty-seven percent (87%) respectively. The final determination as to the relocation of these children would have to be made after closer scrutiny was done of the attendance patterns to these schools and their success as magnet schools. If this is not possible, then an analysis must be made as to which schools, or school, to assign the Badgett children. possible. Zones A, G & L are the zones that possess the greatest possibility for increased enrollment in the District, as these are the sections of Little Rock that have exhibited the greatest population growth. This area must be closely watched over the next couple of years. Within each zone. Zones A and L are fast approaching maximum capacity, or exceeding, it, at this time. Only Zone G, which includes Romine Elementary were School, has additional capacity. Before expansions considered to Fulbright and Terry, I think a concerted effort must be made to maximize Romine Elementary School. is to remain an inter-district school, If Romine district attraction is not strong in this area. and if the interthen this should be considered the alternative location for expansive This will hinge greatly on the ability of Romine's success as an inter-district school. seating in west Little Rock. Should Romine become more successful in the future, then the District must seriously consider additions to Fulbright and Terry, and eventually we must examine the possibility of a new elementary school in west Little Rock. and is addressed in the Inter-District Plan. This was understood The area of southwest Little Rock containing Zones J, K, M and N has exhibited a decrease in population ranging from six point five percent (6.5%) to ten point two percent (10.2%) an area basis. on If the capacities of these schools continue to range from eighty percent (80%) to ninety-seven percent (97%) , then we will have to give serious consideration to closing one of the schools in this area. If that consideration is made, I would recommend a further analysis of those four (4) subdivided into J-K and M-N. areas An attendance zone analysis should be done to determine which schools in those areas 22 should be considered for closing. At the present time, I have no firm recommendation to make as to which school. The area that contains Zones B, C and H is a relatively stable area with an average decrease in population of around one percent (1%) to one point five percent (1.5%) . However, there are numerous elementary schools in this area, ranging in capacity from seventy-five percent (75%) to one hundred two percent (102%). This area presents the greatest possibility for an integrated atmosphere in all of Little Rock. there are schools However, in this area that have outlived their usefulness, are costly to operate, small, cannot be expanded, and the immediate neighborhoods and zones do not support their Fair Park Elementary and Woodruff Elementary Schools fall in this category. existence. be given to closing Serious consideration should one preferably Fair Parle Elementary. (1) of these two (2) schools. The recent expansion and monies dedicated to Woodruff, although the school is not very cost-efficient to run, would warrant that it be given a higher consideration to remain open. Fair Park, on the other hand, is a^ small school, with a large backlog of maintenance and repair, and could be closed to support the economic initiatives of the District without, I believe, detrimentally affecting the racial balance of all the other schools in this This, however, must be further examined by Student Assignments. area. This preliminary study begs many issues, inability and the lack of time to explore indepth further demographic data. Student Assignment data, and weigh it much more closely to the desegregation efforts of the Little Rock Because of the School It is hopeful that it will provide preliminary information to the Superintendent and staff regarding perceived facility actions that are recommended to District. occur in the near future. DCE/rlh/zone 23ZONE DESCRIPTIONS ZONE A ZONE B Zone A is an area west of the line drawn north and south along Highway 430 to the 630 Interchange, and then west and north to the city limits. Fulbright Elementary Schools. It includes Terry and Zone B is an area running east of a line running north and south along 430 to the intersection of 630, then east to University Boulevard, extending north to the river. It includes Jefferson, Brady, McDermott and Williams Magnet Elementary Schools. a ZONE C Zone C is the area east of University Avenue running north and south to 63 0, running east on 630 to the railroad tracks that approach the river, and then following the city limits along the Arkansas River. It includes Forest Park, Fair Park, Woodruff and Pulaski Heights Elementary Schools. ZONE D Zone D is essentially inter-city area. It is the area east of the continuation of the railroad tracks near Central High School, south to the city limits, and east along 1-30, and north to the river. It includes Mitchell, Rightsell, M.L. King, Gibbs Magnet, Rockefeller and Washington Elementary Schools. ZONE E Zone E is located east of 1-630 from a line drawn north and south on 630, south to the city limits, and then east to a north-south line immediately east of the aizrport, to the northern city limit. It includes Booker, Carver Magnet Elementary Schools. ZONE F Zone F is an area to the east of a line drawn north and south on the east side of the airport, following the south-eastern boundary of the city limit east to the Arkansas River, and back to the originating point, includes Badgett Elementary School. It ZONE G Zone G is an area to the west of Barrow Road, extending from 1-630 to Asher, along Asher across 430, and then north along the city limits, to where it joins in to the extension beyond 630. School. It includes Romine Elementary ZONE H Zone H is an area to the east of Barrow Road, south to Asher Boulevard, then east to University, north to 630. It includes Wilson and Bale Elementary Schools. ZONE I Zone I is an area to the east of University between 630 I and Asher Boulevard, east to the railroad tracks by Central High School. It includes Franklin, Stephens, and Garland Elementary Schools.ZONE J Zone J is an area south of Asher, bounded on the east by 630, on the west by the city limits, where they meet at It the interchange in the southwest part of the city, includes Meadowcliff, Western Hills and Dodd Elementary Schools. ZONE K Zone K is an area east of University, bounded on the south by 1-630, around to the railroad tracks, and on the north by Asher. It consists of Wakefield and Geyer Springs Elementary Schools. ZONE L Zone L is west of 630 to the city limits and consists of Otter Creek Elementary School. ZONE M Zone M is an area south and east of 1-630 to the city limits, bounded on the west by Geyer Springs Boulevard. It consists of Mabelvale, Chicot, Watson and Cloverdale Elementary Schools. ZONE N Zone N is an area east of Geyer Springs Boulevard, south to the city limits. Baseline Elementary School. around to 630. It includes of 2I ____J 1 Q 1 S zz^ 1 I ^CS^DV a, Cmak^ leOenneB. ^etninut'' L r 7 o: ittle Rock School District/ A, mo A.PMori^ I'Miiii ft: 1 Dkm O Dodd Scheel I r 'UaHwNejMSdl^ C tjun B Iffl <V! g^Si LwfTS^ iT 1 /) i!iw lUsnet WMtnriHli] itien. Be( SOMoi 52- rJwiflM 1. .i>ii ij ijwT otiKainSaM ' Jitko^Scm' TT IE E f * ,1 J / I' I leScErScKMlb' 3 I ---fj 3''' ittle h" I ock School Distnct_ iJjHSehart'h % JU i i '+ ZT= a I Mil ('. I iknaiSc^ : n iZ'^! \1^ulaski"County Special School District .( r i !FACILITIES ASSESSMENT SUMMARY School Site Renov. Upor. Gen. Sup. Oper Cost Ttl Eval Badgett 6 5 4 6 1 4 Bale 7 6 4 5 3 5 Baseline 5 6 8 6 7 6 Booker 8 6 7 4 1 5 Brady 6 6 5 6 8 6 Carver 9 9 10 7 2 7 Chicot 8 9 8 9 5 8 Cloverdale 6 6 6 7 8 1 Dodd 6 7 1 6 8 1 Fair Park 3 5 3 4 5 4 Ft. Park 4 5 5 6 10 6 Franklin 6 5 6 7 3 5 Fulbright 8 5 8 6 8 7 Garland 4 5 5 6 1 4 GeyerSpgs 7 9 10 8 6 8 Gibbs 1 6 7 5 1 5 Jefferson 6 5 4 5 7 5 King 8 9 10 9 5 8 ! Mabelvale McDermott Meadowclif Mitchell OtterCreek Pul. Hts. Rightsell Rockfeller Romine Stephens 7 1 6 4 8 5 4 8 7 7 6 6 6 7 1 4 8 6 5 10 7 8 4 3 9 5 4 8 5 10 5 7 5 4 6 5 5 6 6 9 1 8 9 1 9 9 1 1 1 5 6 7 6 4 8 6 4 6 5 8 4, Terry Wakefield Washington Watson West Hills williams Wilson Woodruff NOTE 8 5 8 7 8 8 5 3 7 6 9 7 8 5 8 5 6 4 10 7 7 5 6 5 7 4 8 5 1 7 4 6- 10 8 6 6 1 4 5 6 8 5 8 6 e 6 5 5 Areas are evaluated with one (1) being the lowest, ten (10), highest. DCE/rlh/eaton Ha a aa 1 i 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Badgett Elementary School is located in the east side of town. It is a single-story building with approximately 23,000 square feet. This school is about thirty-five (35) years old, and was last renovated in 1965. school is in a remotely populated area. There is ample ground for expansion and the (2) trailers on-site being used There are presently two as teaching areas. and the following projects are considered necessary for the further use of this facility: PROJECTS COST i Providing adequate office, counselling, and media space Waterproofing facility 150,000 45,000 R Fire alarm system 15,000 R Lighting retrofit Asbestos removal 150,000 250,000 R HVAC Repairs HVAC Heat Repairs/Replacement 10,000 75,000 R General groundwork (playground, parking lot, etc.) 20,000 R ADA adaptations 40,000 R TOTAL $755,000 R I DCE/rlh/updateCOMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bale Elementary School sits in the western center of the city. is approximately 33,600 square feet. It The school was last renovated in 1968 . The facility requires some major repairs. It is generally lacking in administrative and media center space, and has some trailers for additional classroom space. The heating system has been replaced, and window air conditioners being the primary ventilation system, years old. The school is approximately thirty-four (34) PROJECTS COST Sitework, seeding, playground equipment 75,000 Lighting, plumbing fixtures Exterior door replacement Energy management system Intercom system ADA adaptations Roof replacement TOTAL DCE/rlh/update 150,000 8,000 45,000 5,500 55,000 115,000 $453,500 2I 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Baseline Elementary School is located in the southwest portion of the city. The pri--n-c-i-p--a-l s-t-r-u-c-t ure was comp.let.ed. in 1958 and was last renovated in 1975. It is approximately 50,500 square feet. Some work has been done at Baseline over the last couple of years to enhance lighting and general grounds. PROJECTS COST New electrical service 15,000 ADA adaptations 40,000 HVAC replacement 200,000 Energy management system 15,000 Fire alarm system 15,000 TOTAL $285,000 DCE/rlh/update ( 3 COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL BOOKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Booker Elementary School is located on the east side of Little Rock. is approximately 74,500 square feet. The original building was constructed in 1963 and there was a remodeling in The elementary school was adapted from a junior high school. There is sufficient grounds around the school to include a track and football field, and ample room for.- expansion. 1973 . It PROJECTS COST Intercom system 6,000 ADA adaptations 30,000 HVAC repairs 50,000 Energy management system 45,000' Fire alarm system 15,000 General sitework 5,000 TOTAL $151,000 II II DCE/rlh/update 4 ICOMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Brady Elementary School built 1960 and comprises The school was last renovated in Work has been done at Brady over the last couple of years, pax'ticularly in the grounds area, and some heating/ventilation work although more is needed. - - - was approximately 36,200 square feet. 1963 . in and years, The school lacks sufficient media center, administrative and health room space, as do many of the The school is located in the west other schools in the District, central section of Little Rock. PROJECTS COST Lighting retrofit 150,000 HVAC replacement 75,000 ADA adaptations 30,000 Asbestos removal 35,000 TOTAL $290,000 DCE/rlh/update 5 I ICOMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Carver Magnet Elementary School approximately 61,700 square feet. was built in 1989. It is It was built to replace the old Carver School at Sth and Apperson and is located in the east side of the city. The school, generally, is in good condition and lacks only a few major repairs. PROJECTS! COST Energy management system 45,000 ADA adaptations 20,000 Media Center expansion 50,000 TOTAL $115,000 DCE/rlh/update 6COMMENTS I 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Chicot Elementary School burned in October of 1994. The appraisal noted here, and its rating on subsequent sheets, io baocd un me re-configuration as it was originally constructed, only with walls. The school is located in western Little Rock, is based on the 1974 . cafeteria. and was built in Its last renovation was in 1994, with the addition of a The school has ample room for expansion, and only lacks for administrative space and a general lay-out that although it's conducive to the academic program could be enhanced upon in new . The school is approximately 60,000 square feet. construction. DCE/rlh/update 7COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Cloverdale Elementary School is approximately thirty-five (35) years old. 7 ''--- It IS located in the southwest section of Little Rock and comprises 33,300 square feet. Its last major renovation was in 1991 when kindergarten rooms and cafeteria and kitchen were added to the school. The site is generally flat and has drainage problems, but otherwise is conducive., to the education There is ample room for expansion, if necessary. process. PROJECTS: COST Site drainage and improvement 20,000 ADA adaptations 40,000 Lighting retrofit 150,000 New gas piping 25,000 TOTAL $235,000 DCE/rlh/update 8COMMENTS! 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Dodd Elementa^^ School is located in the southwest quadrant of the The original school is approximately twenty-five (25) and the main portion of the building around twenty (20) Renovations were last completed in 1992. 46,700 square feet. city. old, old. years years The building is Dodd suffers from the lack of a sewer system and IS the only school in the District on a septic tank, room for but only with major engineering work relocate the septic system. General grounds improvement is needed, especially in the area of parking lot and general There are trailers and an accessory wooden building to"meet the educational needs. expansion, There is to appearance. PROJECTS COST Asbestos removal 200,000 I Energy management system 20,000 . HVAC replacement 200,000 ADA adaptations 31,000 I Intercom system 7,500 Sewer work 25,000 I TOTAL $483,500 I I I I I DCE/rlh/update 9 II JI 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR I COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Fair Park Elementary School is located in the north central section city. The school was originally constructed in 1929, with additions in 1937 and 1950. The last renovation was in i Qsn The of the city. The last renovation was in 1980. school is approximately 29,000 square feet. scnooi IS approximately 29,000 square feet. It is located in a residential area, but on an extremely small site. I..________ ' ^ three (3) trailers used to supplement the - There is no teacher parking and general access from major streets is limited by narrow side streets. the school, In addition to academic program. PROJECTS COST Administrative, classroom, and media center additions 300,000 Roof replacement 150,000 Energy management system UB 20,000 Heat/Ventilation work 65,000 Asbestos removal 95,000 ADA adaptations 50,000 Fire alarm system 15,000 Lighting retrofit 100,000 TOTAL $795,000 ID III 10 10 DCE/rlh/update 10COMMENTS: I I I I I I I I 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOT. Forest Park Elementary School was originally built in 1913 a frame construction building, located of the city. It is , -- -in the north-central part The school was last renovated - - ---- approximately 28,900 square feet. The Forest square feet. in 1980 and comprises extremely restricted and has two (2) academic program. Park site is trailers to supplement the , . . - - The grounds do not drain well, and there is limited space for playgrounds. addition, there is no parking. General access to the site is acceptable. PROJECTS: COST General sitework Roof replacement Energy management system ADA adaptations Heating replacement Waterproofing TOTAL DCE/rlh/update 11 25,000 100,000 20,000 175,000 65,.000 45,000 $430,000COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Franklin Elementary School was constructed in 1949 and is located in the central part, of the city. It was last renovated in 1990 and comprises square feet. The school is generally accessible and enhancements have been made to the front approximately 68,500 feet. area, parking lot, driveways and grounds. Portions of the building have been re-roofed and certain classrooms have had interior enhancements such as carpeting and tile. The school is one of many considered ADA inaccessible at the present time. PROJECTS COST Sitework 50,000 Exterior roofing 100,000 Lighting retrofit 150,000 Heating replacement 100,000 Energy management system 20,000 ADA adaptations 100,000 Waterproofing 65,000 TOTAL $585,000 DCE/rlh/update 12COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Fulbright Elementary School is located in the western portion of It was originally constructed in 1979 and there have the city. been no ma.jor renovations since. The school is 66,900 square feet. The site is limited in that it is beginning to erode and sitework is necessary. The school is considered easily accessible from the surrounding residential generally, ADA accessible. neighborhood. and the building is, PROJECTS COST Site development 65,000 Energy management system Roof replacement L 45,000 190,000 I ADA adaptations 20,000 I TOTAL $320,000 I I I I I DCE/rlh/update 13COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: GARLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Garland Elementary School was originally constructed in 1922 and had renovations as late as 1989. This school is located in the central portion of the city and comprises approximately 38,600 square feet. The site of Garland is extremely small. Most of it has been developed into general play area with some parking. There have been some additions to the building to assist in the academic area however, the facility is seriously lacking in standardized classroom sizes, media center space, administrative and health room facilities. There In addition, there are numerous structural maintenance and repair items which should be completed, and it would be extremely difficult to This facility is old current codes. bring it in line with PROJECTS COST Energy management system 20,000 R ADA adaptations 170,000 H Lighting retrofit 150,000 Administrative and media center expansions 270,000 H New electrical service 200,000 Heating/ventilation replacements 350,000 H TOTAL $1,160,000 H n H DCE/rlh/update 141995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR I COMMENTS 2 NAME OF SCHOOL: I GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Geyer Springs Elementary School is located in the southwest portion the_ It underwent a major renovation in 1991, and it is approximately 42,000 square feet. The school is located on a small site however, with the new additions in 1991 and the removal of trailers, the school is considered manageable and meets the School District's academic needs. of the city. PROJECTS: COST I ADA adaptations 20,000 TOTAL $20,000 I I I DCE/rlh/update I I I 15COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL GIBBS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Gibbs Elementary School is located in the central portion of the city and was originally constructed in 1-9-5-3-. There have been no major renovations since that date. Gibbs is co-located with Dunbar Junior High School and immediately adjacent to the Gibbs Community Center. Its location and site make it well-suited for an The Its it well-suited for elementary school as all is located in a residential area. school lacks for expansion to administrative and media center space, but is considered, generally, to be in average condition. PROJECTS COST New media center 200,000 Energy management system 45,000 ADA adaptations 60,000 TOTAL $305,000 DCE/rlh/update 16 COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Jefferson Elementary School is located in the north-central section of the was originally constructed in 1967 and a renovation is planned for 1995. city. It in The school is approximately 43,500 The Jefferson site is an extremely poor site for an The school was adapted to this site as opposed to designing the school to be conducive to the educational needs. The school sits on eight (8) different levels which would make it extremely difficult to adapt to the handicapped child. continuity of general lay-out, other than all classrooms feed from square feet. elementary school. There is no a central corridor. Renovations have been completed in 1991 and 1992 with re-roofing and some interior work to include and tiling. carpeting PROJECTS: COST Replace exterior windows 150,000 Plumbing replacement 150,000 HVAC replacement 285,000 Fire alarm system 15,000 II Waterproofing 65,000 Energy management system Heating system replacement 20,000 35,000 Iv ADA adaptations 200,000 TOTAL $925,000 DCE/rlh/update 17 COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL M.L. KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The new Martin Luther King Elementary School is located in the central Little Rock area. It is aonroximatelv 77.nnn II It is approximately 72,000 square feet, .. - . The school is-considered to be able meet all academic needs of the programs. Insufficient property i available to the School District for its construction in some support areas, such as parking and playgrounds, and are located on There are no major projects pending for this facility. and was completed in 1993. its construction in ! to was leased property. n r tl bl [i n II IR DCE/rlh/update 18COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: MABELVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mabelvale Elementary School was constructed in 1980. It is located in the southwest portion of the city and is approximately 55,600 square feet. The facility is a single-story, brick structure and has ample grounds for expansion. There is one two- story section. square feet. and it is ADA accessible. one PROJECTS COST Sitework 14,000 Asbestos removal 25,000 Energy management system 45,000 HVAC replacement 130,000 II ADA adaptations 50,000 II TOTAL $264,000 h M n DCE/rlh/update I 19 hCOMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL McDermott Elementary School is located in the northwest section of the city. no major The school has ample grounds, but situated in an area which makes playground accessibility and drainage a continuous problem. The school was constructed in 1967 and there have been renovations since that date. is PROJECTS COST HVAC controls 50,000 Energy management system 20,000 Roof replacement 120,000 II ADA adaptations 50,000 M TOTAL $240,000 II II n n II DCE/rlh/update 20 ICOMMENTS 199-5 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AITO MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Meadowcliff Elementary School was built in 1956 and there was a - - The school is in the southwest portion of the city, and is approximately 37,000 square feet. major addition in 1962. I - -------- The school is located in a residential area, but traffic routing around the school is not conducive to school support. _L__ ____ routed around the school which makes it very inconvenient and dangerous to the children. Parking is limited and bus access should be renovated. The traffic must be Parking is limited and bus Recent renovations include some groundswork and the replacement of the heating/ventilation system. The area is considered lacking in media center space and administrative and health room areas. PROJECTS: COST Energy management system 20,000 Asbestos removal 250,000 ADA adaptations 120,000 Flooring replacement 25,000 IC General sitework Fire alarm system 50,000 25,000 h Administrative,, media center expansion 300,000 n TOTAL $790,000 DCE/rlh/update ( 21COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL MITCHELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Mitchell Elementary School is located in the central portion of the The original structure was built in 1908, and there were renovations as late as 1991. city. I This school is approximately 39,000 This school suffers from being an old building. Construction today would never be built the way this school was. It is a wooden-frame building with a brick exterior. Press-metal ceilings have become extremely difficult to maintain, and in future they will have to be completely removed and the school re-insulated. Plumbing leaks on all floors and the possible rotting of wood floors due to the capping of tile and carpet add to the maintenance problems of this building. located in a residential area, is extremely small, and a limited area available for parking and playground. The school, additionally, would be very hard to adapt for handicapped children. square feet. years. entire The site, although is PROJECTS The school. COST I Energy management system 45,000 Interior flooring 10,000 HVAC replacement 50,000 Waterproofing 40,000 Plumbing replacement 120,000 Lighting retrofit 150,000 Fire Code compliance 200,000 n ADA adaptations 230,000 Ceiling replacement 200,000 TOTAL $1,065,000 DCE/rlh/update 221995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR n 11 If n II COMMENTS: NAME OF SCHOOL OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Otter Creek Elementary School is a small school located in the western part of the city. It is approximately 36,500 square feet located in a and was built around 1979. The facility is residential area with easy access and plenty of area for expansion? Although some minor sitework is needed. meets the academic standards. the school, generally, PROJECTS COST Energy management system ADA adaptations Sitework TOTAL DCE/rlh/update 23 45,000 30,000 15,000 $90,000COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Pulaski Heights Elementary School is co-located with Pulaski Heights Junior High School. The facilities were originally completed in 1921 and minor renovations were completed in 1971. Approximately 58,000 square feet is dedicated to the elementary school. Pulaski Heights is located in a residential area but has completely maximized its site. The addrition of trailers this year to support the academic program has posed a serious handicap on the school's ability to provide adequate parking. Playground expansions in the last couple of years have met the needs of the children, remains a problem. yet general trafficability around the school still The facility is old and is maintainable due to heating replacements which have been completed over the last couple of years. PROJECTS: COST Auditorium relighting 30,000 Fire alarm system 10,000 Energy management system 25,000 Waterproof ing 40,000 ADA adaptations 220,000 Lighting retrofit 70,000 TOTAL $396,000 DCE/rlh/update 24COMMENTS: 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL RIGHTSELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Rightsell Elementaory School is a small intercity school that constructed in 1906 with renovations as late as 1991. - - was is approximately 36,600 square feet. The building The school is located in a residential area on an extremely small site with little room for expansion and inadequate space for parking or playground area. In addition to wings added in 1991, there is also a trailer to meet further academic needs. Rightsell, being an incentive school, has had much money put into it over the last couple of years, such that the list of major repairs has now diminished. However, critically needed areas, such as additional media center space, health room space, specialized classrooms and administrative space make the school extremely limited in its overall abilities. It is a small school, and although it is in fairly good shape, it has almost outlived its usefulness as an educational facility. to expand on the site is a major detriment to further The inability enhancements at this location. program PROJECTS! COST Sitework and drainage 40,000 Code compliance constiruction 150,000 h Energy management system ADA adaptations 20,000 230,000 n Plumbing replacements 125,000 II Fire alarm system 20,000 TOTAL $585,000 DCE/rlh/update 25 h1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS! NAME OF SCHOOL ROCKEFELLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Rockefeller Elementary School is located on the eastern side of the central Little Rock area. The school was constructed in 1980, and is approximately 64,500 square feet. It is a single-story building that is readily accessible but located in a decaying residential -area. It is bordered on one side by State property, which limits its expansion in that direction, and by city streets on the other sides. The school has continued to have serious heating / ventilation problems. funding. and they will persist without adequate PROJECTS COST II Energy management system HVAC replacements 50,000 300,000 11 ADA adaptations 25,000 II TOTAL $375,000 II n n DCE/rlh/update 26 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Romine Elementary School was originally constructed in 1961 and added to in 1993. The school is approximately 42,300 square feet. It is a single-story building with a flat roof and window air conditioners throughout most of the facility. It is located in a residential area with ample space for expansion. accessible and has sufficient parking and playground area. It is readily II PROJECTS COST site improvements 25,000 Re-roofing 65,000 Flooring 10,000 Energy management system 20,000 HVAC replacement 60,000 ADA adaptations 70,000 II New electrical service 85,000 II TOTAL $335,000 II n DCE/rlh/update 27 b 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS! NAME OF SCHOOL: STEPHENS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Stephens Elementary School is assessed, dealing with new construction. based on assumptions and readily accessible to the students. The site is in a residential area The most significant H handicap is a small site which will require innovative design to meet academic needs. The proposed new school to be constructed in 1995-1996 will take advantage of off-site parking and off-site n playground areas. The new Stephens Elementary School is estimated to be approximately 70,000 square feet and located in the intercity area. II II II II II n DCE/rlh/update n I 281995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Terry Elementary School is a single-story facility in western It was originally built in 1964 and additions made in 1966 and 1978. Little Rock. were feet. The school is approximately 45,300 square As other elementary schools, it has limited administrative H n and health room space and media center space. However, considered sufficient to maintain this .academic program. _______ sufficient parking, and the site is large enough to allow for expansion. PROJECTS space. it is There is COST n HVAC controls 100,000 Energy management system 30,000 II ADA adaptations 30,000 II Waterproofing 25,000 TOTAL II $185,000 n n DCE/rlh/update 29 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL: WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Wakefield Elementary School is located in southwest Little Rock. It was originally constructed in 1959 with minor additions as late as 1975. The school is approximately 37,400 square feet, single-story building with the major addition being a detached facility at a different elevation. It is a Although sufficient land is available, it is extremely poorly drained and very rocky soil, and could inhibit further expansion of this school. The school is located in a residential area and access is considered easy by foot traffic and by bus. n There is insufficient parking available to meet this school's needs. PROJECTS: COST n Flooring 20,000 Site and exterior work 160,000 II Relighting 150,000 n Heating repairs 100,000 Energy management system 45,000 n Intercom 8,000 ADA adaptations 100,000 II Fire alarm system 10,000 n TOTAL $593,000 DCE/rlh/update 30 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS I NAME OF SCHOOL WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Washington Elementary School is located in the eastern side of central Little Rock and was rebuilt in approximately 90,000 square feet. 1989, and it is building which is readily adaptable. The facility is a single-story walking, and by vehicular traffic. easy access by students acceptable playground area and parking facilities. .It is considered to have an PROJECTS COST Energy management system 20,000 il ADA adaptations 20,000 II TOTAL $40,000 n II II n n n DCE/rlh/update 31 ha t 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OF SCHOOL WATSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL II Watson Elementary School was constructed in 1967 and is located in southwest Little Rock. It is approximately 54,000 square feet and II is a single-story building with adequate property for expansions, if necessary. The school is fairly well laid out, and it is considered to have adequate parking and playground areas. II PROJECTS COST Paving repair 10,000 II Energy management system 45,000 HVAC replacement 75,000 II Asbestos removal 200,000 II ADA adaptations 60,000 Waterproofing 25,000 II TOTAL $415,000 II II n DCE/rlh/update 32COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Western Hills Elementary School was constructed in 1966 and received a major addition in 1991. 42,000 square feet. The school is approximately residential It is a single-story facility located in a area of southwest Little Rock. The school has sufficient property available for expansion and is considered readily accessible. PROJECTS COST HVAC controls 30,000 Energy management system 20,000 Asbestos removal 210,000 ADA adaptations 60,000 Lighting 40,000 TOTAL $360,000 DCE/rlh/update 33COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL: WILLIAMS MAGNET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Williams Magnet Elementary School is located in western Little Rock. a single-story facility It was originally constructed in 1959 and there was an administrative addition in 1994. is approximately 47,200 square feet. The school I Williams has sufficient property for expansion, but is not laid out conducive to support a modern educational program. Its central corridors are hampered by steps which will effect ADA adaptations. In addition, the academic program of the school has placed some restrictions on the ability to maximize its space in the most sufficient manner. PROJECTS: COST New gutters and downspouts, window replacement 175,000 Energy management system 20,000 ADA adaptations 120,000 Media center expansion 180,000 TOTAL $495,000 DCE/rlh/update 1 34 ilH 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR COMMENTS NAME OP SCHOOL: WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL II Wilson Elementary School was constructed in 1927 with additions in 1946 and 1949 and some final additions in 1980. located in the northern part of southwest Little Rock II n ana ana some final additions in 1980. The school is and is approximately 37,000 square feet. Z_ 1___________ for room with expansion, but limited parking^ for staff and faculty Sitework is required because of the underlying rock proximity to streets which hamper drainage. It has a generally adequate site strata and PROJECTS COST Additional parking 40,000 Waterproofing 20,000 Intercom 7,500 ADA adaptations 80,000 Heating control repair 180,000 Energy management system 45,000 Fire alarm system 20,000 TOTAL $397,500 DCE/rlh/update 35COMMENTS 1995 UPDATE OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RENOVATION AND MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR NAME OF SCHOOL WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Woodruff Elementary School was originally constructed in 1911. There were expansions throughout the year, and the latest addition was in 1991. The school is now 38,000 square me scnoo feet. Woodruff Elementary is a two-story brick structure which consists of extremely small classrooms and limited administrative and media center space. The site has been maximized with school building and play space, and there is little-to-no parking for staff and faculty. It is in a residential area and access is considered center space. reasonably easy. little-to-no parking for staff PROJECTS COST Repointing walls and waterproofing 30,000 Energy management system 20,000 HVAC repairs 110,000 ADA adaptations 250,000 Fire Code compliance 150,000 Waterproofing 25,000 TOTAL $585,000 DCE/rlh/update 36LMto Aec* teI CMvVW October 1,1994 Enrollment Comparison October1993 Octobtr 1,1994 Dilltnnct Cental HS" FvHS HalHS UcCtelviHS" ParloiietiHS' Sub-Total 1228 596 586 666 463 sms' wtoMegnetell 3076 CkhrerOale JH Dunbar JH" Forest Heiglils Ji HenOersonJH" UabeMeJH UannJH' Pulaski Heights JH SouthenstJH Sub-Total 566, 439 575 678 453 494 434 524 4163 618 314 362 213 315 1822 1507 130 251 195 210 197 341 351 141 1816 33 8 26 7 10 86 76 5 11 18 27 4 16 5 14 5 1879 918 976 886 788 5447 4659 701 701 788 915 654 851 790 679 wtoMigntH 3669 Bailgetl Bate I Booker" i Zener' Ztrioot I CknerOele I DoM___________ Fair Park Forest Perk FrankUn" | Fulbtighl I Geda^ | Gejer Springs Gibbs' JeHerson king- Mabekrele UcDermott UeedotKfff UitcheiP Otter Creek ! Pulaski Heights Pightselh Rockelelier'' Rortane- ! Stephens' 7erry ! WakeHetd ! Washington- | tVatson Western HXs WUliams'________ Wilson Woodrull Special Schools Sub-Total wio Magnets Grand Total eko Uagnets ..s XIS u n m 6S% 64.92% 60J)4%| TsITg 58.76% 5 J 1040 631 669 684 435 64S7% 3459 66.02%! 3024 80.74%! 62.62%1 72.97% 74.10%! '691^ 58.05% 54.94% 77.17% 521 468 565 661 417 456 431 487 tool 60791 6848%|1 4006 548 279 326 203 328 1684 1356 119 227 197 229 161 366 334 105 1738 1475 84j 5228 70.18%! 3550i 1372 132 225, 265 321 263 325 356 304 189 200 200 300 233 181 208 170 213 357 311 262 306 215 141 190 184 240 247 141 243 337 451 353 215 257 263' 147 27 57 68 76 265 122 263 147 75 97 60 0 10 9! 253 m 3' 78' 121 ' 287' 1891 174 232 127 12 195 197 4 93 73 3 189 303 343 595 69.64%| 7426% 7726% 53.95%| 0 ^9^1 12! 3971 66.2^ 71 5951 54.62% el 509' 69.94% 1331 2i4t 245' 305 ' 254' 3091 44 87 77 245 3 6! 3 5 386 292 7s.n% 64.73% 5 15 21 2 8i 7i 3 15 1 5 51 11 i 1| 7 14 1 292 26 106! 4 4- 2601 10 89 114 207 87 64 23 263) 76.05% 4581 43.67% 345 ! 86.96% 5201 44.81% 205! M-29%i 288 i 7262%! 2991 56.66%! 504 42.26% 553! 64.56% 488 ! 63.73% 5091 51.47% 434 ! 70.51% 2301 93.48% 3411 41.35% 3981 47.74% 169! 97.35% 340 ! 70.59% 3341 73.95% 1451 9764% 5611 43.32% 4471 75.39% 7211 62.55% oi 442) 79.6^ Il 3321 64.76% VO 8 5 m 354 236 61 54 45% 74.29% 62.29% 52.94% 344 '3121 193' 198' 393 235 246 223 160 218 309 340 241 279 260 154 197 225 137 2!,7 151 74 97 73 228 41 269 9 66 121 279 227 124 ' 233' 131 ' 8 ' 196' 207 ' 4 ' 5 49 7i 36 10 37 139 102 7 12 18 27 7 23 6 18 118 95 0 6 4 23 17 12 8 ~~61 8' ~6[ ~91 181 JL _ii_' _5' "lot 20' 1 4 9 16 0 264 124 15 234] 73 2341 295 3271 73 443! 211 340! ~Il^ 81 95 16 Closed 30 13 33 6 7 250 214 10 254 148 iT a o 1637 917 1031 897 800 5282 u < s 63.53% 68.61% 64.89% 76.25% 54.38% 6549% u <e JB- 188 35 63 18 28 80 1 70 -35 -36 10 13 138 4482 1 67.47% 52!-151 8972 4845 251 140681 63.78% 7872 3966 218 12056 . 65.307. 83 87 21 8 5 0 6471 707 780 917 585 845 771 610 5862 80.53% 66.20% 72.44% 72.08% 71^8% 53.96% 55.90% 79.84% -45 29 10 -17 -36 -38 -3 37 6834% -157 SOlIj 70.76% .119 177 309' '3^ 573' 75.14% 69.26% 75.15% 5323% 4081 6225% 588 503 392 298 282 432 443' 542 282 300' 293t '502T 551' 474| 494' 411 272 359 52.55% 68.39% 79.59% 64.77% 72.34% 45.63% 88.71% 43.36% 87.23% 74.33% 54.61% 43.43% 56.08% 71.73% 8 48.79% 67.88% 95.59% 42.90% 420 46.90% 229 98.25% 403! 65.51%! 3231 72.45% 5591 41.86% 413 i 7918% 687 427 317 474 345 243 36 6448% 79 63% 67.82% 52.74% 73.62% 60.91% 41.67% 1 11 20 -16 -9 -16 -12 -11 -24 ' 2 19 -36 25 -17 -36 -78 -103 -13 19 1 -20 15 __4 4 8i -1 I 16 -1 8 3 27 53 26 2 1 0 0 3 7 1 4 18 11 0 -2 2 14 5 5 2 -1 3 o 242 -1 55 11 12 Tes -in -54 6 8 ___2' 69 6' 19 69 217' '3ii| 12' 6| 17 ' 22' 11 ' ZZI 61 4 0 4 13 -2i -25' 93: 1 21 17 65 6 151 -12 0 5! e 481 38 29 50 -21 27 1 7 451 -4 131 1 i 0 24 31 -13! 3 0 3 10' -33 8 -49 13 e o w -7 12. 8915 4772, 400 140871 63.29% ~ 7876 3904 343 12123 i 64.97% 2 2 1 u m .X- -1.62% 3.89% 4.85% 1j08% -438% 0.52% 145% 0.22% 367% -063% -2.02% 2.02% -4.08% 0.96% 2.66% 0.14% 068% 560% 5.00% -2.11% 0.72% 3.99% 2.07% 1.55% 064% 0.04% 191 -3.71% -261 4| 98 3 _6 9 4 2 8 7 5 1 22 n 12 -6 2 2 -14 -15 -23 42 2.17% 1.76% -1.45% -1.06% 2.11% -22!5% 1.16% 8.48% 8.00% 2.69% -2.62% 2.11% 1.55% 5 22 -0.83% -1] 40! 0.90% 6 63i 5.08'% -1.51% Closed u & o 7 4 3 2 4 9, 23 6 4 2 4 3 1 -2 -1.46% -34 -34 -15 15 3.79% 1.93% 0.24% 3.06% 2' -1.71% 9 -0.67% 71 -1.38% -15' -11.27% 7311491 19. -0.49% 4^21125! 67 -0.33% 16674 I 6483 < 437 25594 I 6515% j 16380 1 8194 1 6571 25231 j 64.92%|-294 -26912201-363! -0.23% 146 1 7 1 6948.378 21943 1 6661% H4450.6632 : 540 i 21622 1 66.83% -316 j 162i -321' 0.^2% Office of OesegregeiKxi Page 1 1691 954 1291 1199 1000 6335 5335 666 612 856 907 614 650 746 737 67% 96% 80% 75% 80% 83% 64% 75% 67% 91% 101% 95% 99% 103% 83% u 1 c UI *12.86% 'Magnet 0.11% " Magnet Pragram 5.64% 'tneentive 124% - tntenlisliicl 63911 92% 5541 91% 257 { 69% 401 n% 390 656' 467' '61^ 492 328 351 399 434 540 298 328 353 492 726 515, 517 465 298 351 374 258 469 487 515 492 836 492 64% 87% 87% 96% 90% 60% 91% 80% 106% 102% 100% 95% 91% 83% 102% 76% 92% 96% 88% 91% 102% 112% 89% 66% 66% 109% 84% 82% 87% 3261 97% 5171 92% 394 66% 3241 75% 15717, 90% 13578' 89% 28443 ' 89% 24454I 88% 1.52% 3.03% 49.11% 75.90% -3.80% Area HS Range -7.70% 0.86% -1.02% 022% -10J5% -0.71% -2.41% -10.16% 3.57% 53.07% 79.60% -4.04% Area JH Range 625% 1.98% 426% -3.70% 2.77% -1.18% -1.18% 125% 2.05% 722% -5.68% 28.41% 423% 3726% 4.17% -2.01% -0.40% 0.36% 2.87% 2.95% 5.30% 1826% 528% 5.53% 21.16% 18.53% 3.29% -0.36% -7.61% -4.72% -3.39% 4.52% 0.42% 2.54% 2.97% 0.14% 40.00% 60.00% 0.56% Area Elein Range -142% -146%I ii I I LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT AREA A: _________1210 _________1405 _________1410 _________1440 _________1510 _________1^ __________1512 _________1515 _________1530 _________1^ 1550 _________1610 _________1620 _________3330 _________6110 _________6115 _________6120 _________6122 _________6125 _________6171 6188 SUB-TOTAL AREA B: 1010 1020 1110 1111 1120 1121 1220 12301 1231 co oo < Jk 4 5 17 5 5 11 3 8 1 8 8 1 2 2 5 2 0 6 1 4 1 99 o> co < Jk 5 1 13 2 6 17 4 6 1 5 7 2 2 0 3 4 0 3 1 3 4 89 o O) < jk 3 1 13 3 4 17 5 10 1 5 8 5 2 0 11 4 0 3 1 4 1 101 at ik 6 1 14 5 3 13 5 10 1 6 7 5 1 1 11 3 3 2 1 4 6 108 at < 4 3 21 9 4 19 3 15 3 11 7 4 1 4 16 6 0 2 1 3 6 142 Office of Desegregation 1240 _________1310 _________1311 13121 _________13211 _________1331 ' _________1332' _________1420' _________1421' _________1430' _________1520' _________1531 ' _________15411 _________1542' 1630' SUB-TOTAL 1 4 7 9 0 __ 0 4 1 40 6 8 0 1 5 0 1 4 19 4 2 1 0 6 130 1 2 5 15 2 0 3 2 3 23 4 1 0 1 4 4 2 6 20 4 6 3 3 8 128 7 6' 8| 101 1| _0i 0! 6I QI 321 9| 3| 0| 4I 4| 9| 211 4| 2 5' 5' 1' wT 2 8 6 141 31 2iJ 2 29 1' 6' 01 ~3t 5 29 8 6 2 2 8 159 __8 6 __9 0 __ __1 1 6 5 28 5 2 0 1 4 __ 6 4 18 5 6 10 0 1 134 Page 1 1 3/8/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT ae o> co o o> a> in AREA C: < ik jk < Jk Jk < __________ 620 __________ __________ __________64 650 __________ 660 662 __________6^ 710 811 __________8^ __________910 920 SUB-TOTAL 5 4 1 2 0 2 5 14 2 12 5 6 6 6 12 82 1 1 2 3 0 2 4 14 5 23 7 2 8 12 8 104 6 10 2 1 3 2 3 13 2 28 10 9 12 10 8 119 5 6 7 0 1 1 5 12 6 15 8 3 12 6 8 95 4 2 1 4 2\ 3 0 13 4 it 5 1 8 9 8 86 AHEAD: 411 412 413 420 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 1 1 2 4 4 8 0 4 2 10 1 3 16 5 10 4 5 2 3 3 2 14 5 8 4 2 4 2 8 7 3 6 1 2 1 1 7 13 0 2 5 1 8 13 111 10 4 12 5 6 6 2 2 20 6 6 4 9 4 1 10 6 4 0 2 2 3 2 11 11 0 4 0 7 3 5 12 10 6 5 6 10 7 4 0 14 6 8 1 5 8 3 5 11 4 14 1 1 0 8 2 10 0 3 0 6 11 6 7 4 3 6 2 1 3 1 0 10 3 4 3 10 5 3 9 5 6 4 0 0 4 3 7 4 3 4 4 6 10 0 3 3 4 0 0 4 2 0 15 11 7 4 5 1 2 10 3 7 8 Office of Desegregation Page 2 3/8/95lrsd kindergarten enrollment co so o> 00 o a> at at I _________459 4^ 4T 4^ 4^ 464 471 472 473 474 r L________476' 4'77" 478' 479r 480" 481 ' 4^' 4^' 484~ r 4^' ^UB-TOTAL r < Jk __ ___8 12 13 1 11 ___6 9 11 ___2 10' __ 31 __ 4' __51 __9' 13' __a' 5' 7' 319 < 6 9 11 4 __1_ ___6 11 11 __2 14 __5 __4' __7' __3' 6 15' 18' 7| 14' 372r < Jla_ __1_ 2 1 __3 3 1 11 9 8 2 1 1 2 13 5 2 5 309 ik 5 3 11 8 3 8 1 1 ___3 9 __6 __4 __4 __0 __6 12 "TtI 15' __51 3' 283T Jk 4 ___ 4 7 3 4 4 9 9 2 6 8 4 5 TtI Tn Til Ti 9| AREA E: 111 112 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 210 220 232 240 3011 8 5 5 6 6 15 0 8 3' 4 _1_ 2 2 2 2 2 tT ir ISUB-TOTAL I 13 15 2 5 2 93 17 20 0 4 1 81 0 5| 1 4 10 8 5 15' 5' -1 "igl TT 3' 2' 96 4 -i TT Ji' Ji _7j 7' _3 161 1 5 1 90 1 9 ~?l ~~7^ Til ~3] ~2^ 31 AREA F: I Office of Desegregation 3210 3251 3253 3250 3201 3255 3640 3643 3459 0 3 1 6 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 8 0 0 2 2 0 0 5 6 12 2 0 3 0 0 0 6 T 0 0 4 0 0 0 Page 3 3/8/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT (O so A A o A a> A SUB-TOTAL AREAG: < Jk 13 < Jk 14 < U. 28 $ 25 < Jii_ 19 1 I Office of Desegregation _________1711 _________1712 _________1713 _________1714 _________1715 _________1716 _________1717 _________1721 _________1722 _________1723 _________1724 _________1725 ________1726 _________1727 _________1728 _________3301 _________3^ 3316 4052 SUB-TOTAL AREAH: SUB-TOTAL AREA I: 1810 1811 1812 1813 1821 1822 1823 1824 1910 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 I 5111 512 513 521 522 523 524 525 526 4 8 2 20 4 6 13 8 13 3 5 3 6 12 0 6 8 1 0 122 11 5 7 S 12 14 21 7 2 1 8 3 11 0 107 2 1 12 4 5 1 10 0 6 1 9 3 20 17 5 16 13 13 5 7 3 4 18 0 7 8 3 3 8 1 2 18 9 5 16 6 6 7 10 1 6 18 4 3 3 3 3 155| 135 1 7 1 15 9 6 11 5 6 5 6 2 3 8 8 12 4 3 4 116 2 1 5 25 7 __9 12 6 7 5 15 3 1 11 6 4 6 5 3 139 I T 15 4 8 8 11 14 12 61 -Ji 31 3i 9i 1! loeT 14 0 6 3 6 9 14 3 2 2 6 5 3 1 74 21 2 9 6 13 8 19 8 2 1 8 3 10 1 111 1 __1^ 9 5 13 11 21 11 2 9 4 6 11 0 110 I 1! Qi 121 141 0 4 41 8 Page 4 8 6 0 12 7 0 3 3 4 6 10 10 13 5 0 5 1 2 14 0 10 10 6 9 4 3/8/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT co 80 O> SO o at o N Office of Desegregation __________527 __________528 __________529 __________530 __________53 __________532 __________533 __________534 535 __________536 537 __________538 __________539 __________5^ __________552 __________553 __________554 __________555 __________556 __________561^ __________562 __________563 __________571 __________5^ __________57^ __________574 __________5^ __________581^ __________582 __________583' __________584 585 586' __________587' 591 ' SUB-TOTAL AREA J: 2010 2015 2020 2110 2120 4001 4010 4015 4017 4020 4025 4046 < Jk 4 51 0 0 2 11 11 5 13 1 3 7 5 1 12 19 6 1 9 12 9 5 3 11 5 22 5 4 7' 8' 12' 13' 2' 4 13' 1 344T 3 10 3 15 11 0 8 1 0 3 2 6 < Jk ___II 33 0 0 9' 9 1' 2' 13' 3' 6' 5' 1' 2' 5- 6' 8' o' 5' 10' 9' 14' 9' 13' 8' 9 4' 3' 4' 8 6' 18' 3 7~ 14' 2 sTtF 121 T 8 16 1 4 1 1 3 8 4 Page 5 < Jk 3 32 0 0 11 5 7 6 13 2 9 5 1 3 8 15 8 0 6 7 15 9 10 8 8 12 10 2 15 10 15 6 6 5 6 1 317 3 13 5 171 14 5 9 2 1 9 31 < 6 40 0 0 4 3 1 1 3 3 8 __3 5 __3 3 10 5 __q 5 7 12 10 13 6 1 11 10 6 4 10 8 6' 2 __5' 9' 0 285 5 10 4 26 10 0 7 1 0 3 7 0 < Jk 3 9 2 ___3 11 __2 ___5 __3 __6 __9 __9 __3 __0 __4 11 7 __9 __q __9 __8 __5 __5 __8 1 __6 __8 __8 __8 12 6 13 14 2 6 14 0 291 4 8 4 21 14 4 9 1 0 3 1 0 3/8/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT Office of Desegregation (0 eo m <0 o ot o> _________40^ 4049 4053 5467 5470 SUB-TOTAL AREAK: _________4401 _________4405 _________4410 4415 _________4420 _________4429 _________4430 _________7^ 7210 7220 _________7225 _________7^ 7235 _________7240 _________7^ 7250 7276 ________lTn_ 7278 7279 _________7^ 7281 7282 SUB-TOTAL AREAL: _________5^ 5468 _________5472 _________5475 _________5476 _________5477 _________5478 _________5492 _________5493 _________5494 _________5495 5498 SUB-TOTAL AREA M: 3601 < Jk 5 6 0 0 0 73 2 3 2 3 3 4 9 2 2 0 7 12 2 5 4 2 3 3 2 2 0 0 73 1 3 0 8 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 24 4 < Jk 6 6 0 0 0 81 5 4 6 3 7 0 1 11 5 1 0 2 6 7 2 2 2 5 3 4 3 2 0 81 1 3 0 11 1 0 2 3 3 1 1 2 28 4 Page 6 < Jk 6 5 0 0 0 92 < Jk 9 10 0 0 1 93 < Jk 3 3 0 0 0 75 7 2 -1 4 5 1 2 13 4 1 0 4 22 4 1 1 10 6 0 2 2 2 0 100 0 0 0 8 3 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 23 2 9 2 2 1 5 3 2 9 5 2 0 12 14 1 1 4 2 5 0 1 2 2 0 96 0 0 1 9 6 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 28 4 7 2 6 4 8 1 4 15 1 1 0 8 9 3 12 6 5 4 0 5 2 3 0 106 0 0 o 2? S| 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 27 2 3/6/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT oo oo o> to o a> to a Office of Desegregation 3605 3630 3635 3645 3646 3647 3648 3654 3655 5401 5402 5405 5406 5407 5408 5410 5415 5452 5455 5458 5460 5462 5465 7301 7305 7310 7315' 7376 7377' 7378' 7380' 7381 ' 7382 7401 ' 7405' 7410' 7415' 7420' 7425' 7440' 7467' 7468' 7469' 7470' 7471 74731 14,74 7475 7476 7477 7478 < jk 0 0 3 3 1 3 5 13 3 2 2 3 0 0 7 0 4 4 1 1 3 0 0 7 1 3 6 3 2 0 2 5 12 10 3 2 5 8 2 5 0 5 1 0 4 0 1 4 3 0 1 < u. 3 0 7 0 1 3 7 8 5 2 3 2 3 0 3 2 3 2 2 0 2 0 1 10 4 3 6 6 1 2 3 2 7 9 5 < jk Page 7 9 6 2 01 '41 2 1 1 2 0 3 4 1 1 1 1 0 16 2 2 5 S 6 2 0 7 4 3 7 7 0 2 7 0 0 5 0 1 6 3 7 7 0 6 1 3 4 9 13 4 4 7 4 6 0 3 5 6 0 2 0 7 3 0 0 0 at Zj < jk 5 0 6 4 3 6 5 15 5 0 5 2 3 4 5 o' 2 2 2 0 2 o' 3 11 ' 1 ' 3 8' o' 11 ' 4 ' 3 4' 10' 13' 5' 8 7 3 4 0 1 3 5 1 3 0 3 5 4 0 < jk 4 0 10 4 2 7 7 12 5 1 3 2 2 2 7 0 3 3 0 0 3 2 3 8 2 1 7 0 7 4 5 9 22 9 1 6 7 2 3 0 0 6 5 4 1 0 3 8 2 0 0 3/8/95LRSD KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENT I Office of Desegregation co co d < Jk e> a o o> at _________7480 _________7490 7495 SUB-TOTAL AREAN _________3401 _________3405 _________3406 _________3410 _________3415 _________3420 _________3425 _________3430 _________3435 _________3440 _________3445 _________3461 _________3464 _________3610 _________3615 _________3620 _________3625 _________3649 _________3650 _________3651 _________3652 _________7325 _________7330 _________7375 _________7383 _________7384 _________7385 _________7387 _________7388 7390 SUB-TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 0 3 1 3 159 5 14 16 4 5 3 3 2 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 10 1 3 11 1 2 3 4 3 8 4 15 133 1771 < Jk 0 1 0 1 166 5 11 11 6 __6 __Oi 5 1 3 1 0 1 5 0 1 6 5 4 9 7 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 22 2 4 135 1857 Page 8 < J^ 0 3 1 3 201 7 8 14 9 3 4 1 6 1 2 0 0 7 0 2 0 4 2 9 8 1 8 3 5 2 5 1 19 5 5 141 1879 < Jk 2 3 1 71 10 5 8 4 4 4 2 4 5 3 0 0 2 o' 2 3 6 1 5 5 1 1' 2 7| 0 1 1 JU 6| 4l 116 1821 < Jk 0 1 2 209 13 __8 13 5 6 3 __3 2 4 2 0 0 11 0 1 2 1 4 11 5 0 4 2 6 0 1 4 17 2 1 149 1846 3/8/95 This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.