{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1717","title":"Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, motion for additional time in which to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000; District Court, order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1999-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, motion for additional time in which to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000; District Court, order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1717"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["11 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION DEC O 2 f999 JAMES! McCRRMACK, CLERK By: ~ ~\\i\\l:11\\\\Q[}_ OEP ClERlt LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER No. LR-C-82-866 1999 Off-ICE Of DESEGREGATIOr~ MONITOHING The Joshua Intervenors filed an unopposed motion requesting additional time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's motion for approval of Plan 2000. For good cause shown the motion is GRANTED [docket no. 3313]. The Joshua Intervenors have to and including December 20, 1999 to respond to the District's motion. ~ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS o2:- DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999 ~\u003c:FJUDG~E  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT fHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKETSHEET IN COMPU!CE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(8) FACP ON ,~:,'3-99 . ev_...... t;. __ RECEIVED DEC 2 2 1999 ufflCE OF DESEGREGATION MOHITORING FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT /\\RK,'\\N~  \u003c; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DEC 2 1: 1999 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAM~S w. MGGORMAGK; GU:RK WESTERN DIVISION ov; _ ____ ~-:::-:-::::::-:: 01:P.CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, DEFENDANT .MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS MOTION FOR ADDmONAL TTh1E IN wmcH TO RESPOND TO PCCSD'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN 2000 The Joshua Intervenors for its motion for extension ohime to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's Motion for Approval of Plan 2000 state: 1. Additional time is needed by counsel for the Joshua Intervenors in order to prepare a . response to defendant's Motion for Approval of Plan 2000. 2. Lead counsel, John W. Walker's trial schedule has been such that additional time is needed in order to assist in preparation of a response to said motion. He previously prepared for an oral argument in the case of Brenda Sanders v. Alliance Home Health Care, Case No. 99-__ before the United States Court of Appeals and also prepared for and was in hearing In the Matter ofZavian C. Sanders, a minor, Case No. 94-99, in the Chancery Court of Ouachita County, Camden, Arkansas last week. 3. Counsel for the defendants has been contacted to determined whether he opposes this request. Undersigned counsel has not been notified by PCSSD's counsel that he opposes this motion because he is out of town according to his office. 4. This request is not being made for purposes of delay. WHEREFORE, Joshua prays that the_court enter an order extending the time to and including January 3, 2000 in which to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's Motion for Approval of Plan 2000. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 '-. J ' . I  _..,  I. , I~ ... /,' ' .,,- By: .. I U/1'- -' )1l,/: v '~'~ -, \"- fohn W. Walker - #64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing pleading has been sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, to all counsel of record including counsel for the Pulaski County Special School District on this 20th day of December, 1999. [;u~ )i}. /~a IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * l\\1RS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * ORDER FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS DEC 2 S 1999 JAMES J'. ~AMACK, CLERK By: \\L,~uJ\\Mof::::..__ OEP Cl.ERK The Joshua Intervenors filed a motion for an extension of time in which to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's Motion for Approval of Plan 2000 [DE #3316]. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. The Joshua Intervenors have to and including January 3, 2000 in which to respond. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS ;}.?-~AY OF ~'I...J CHIEF JUD E UN1TED STATES DISTRICT COURT rHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE Wlf ~ULE 56 AND/OR 79(8) FRCP 'JN / ()-.,J.8 - 9 BY JZC: ,- , 1177  This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1712","title":"Court filings: District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) brief in support of Plan 2000; District Court, two orders; District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1999-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Magnet schools","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) brief in support of Plan 2000; District Court, two orders; District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion for approval of Plan 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1712"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["84 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * ORDER FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS NOV 0-5 J999 JAM~~~.:_ Mff!ORMACK, CLERK By: \\/_ ~ \\1 !\\A\\~ OEP CL,ERJ('\"' This Order addresses two matters: the Magnet Review Committee's (MRC's) request to change the magnet schools' grade structure and number of seats and the Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to modify the settlement agreement. After careful consideration, the Court approves the MR.C's proposed changes regarding grade structure and seating configuration; this approval does not extend to proposals regarding funding for the approved changes. Further, the Court denies LRSD's motion to modify the settlement agreement to the extent LRSD seeks modification of the total number of magnet school seats the State must fund (4,065). However, to the extent LRSD seeks modification of the number of state-funded seats within individual magnet schools, the Court holds LRSD's motion in abeyance, pending further briefing from the parties. 1 - I. In a letter to the Court, the MRC requested approval to change the grade structure of the interdistrict magnet schools and the number of seats within five of the six schools. 1 The following chart is based on information contained in the MR.C's letter. It illustrates that, relative to the number of seats stipulated in the settlement agreement, the proposed changes decrease the number of seats in the four magnet elementary schools, increase the number of seats at Parkview, and leave unchanged the number of seats at Mann. 2 As a result, the total number of seats will increase by 132 (from 4,065 to 4,197). School Booker Carver Gibbs Williams Mann Parkview TOTALS Seats Stipulated in Settlement Agreement 660 613 351 515 935 991 4,065 Revised Seats!IJil~SJJ 4,191Mil The MRC projects that the proposed seating changes will increase costs by $129 per student. Further, the MRC proposes that the three Pulaski County school districts and the State 1 Docket no. 3269, attachment. The MRC explains that the changes would enable the magnet schools to conform to the changed structure ofLRSD schools. Pursuant to its revised desegregation plan, the LRSD reorganized its traditional elementary, junior high, and senior high schools into a new configuration, which includes middle schools. 2 See letter attached to docket no. 3269. 2 share in paying for the increased costs as follows: Party State North Little Rock School District Pulaski County Special School District Little Rock School District Proposed Increase $567,270 74,373 138,171 354,917 The Court gave the parties an opportunity to respond to the MR.C's request and advised that it would approve the changes if no objections were filed. 3 The State responded it did not object to changing the magnet schools' structure and seating, but did object to providing funds for more magnet school seats than specified in the parties' settlement agreement. 4 LRSD responded with a motion to modify the settlement agreement, 5 and the State replied. 6 II. No party has objected to the MR.C's request to change the magnet schools' grade structure and seating numbers. Accordingly, the Court approves the changes in structure and seating but emphasizes that the approval does not extend to MR.C's proposal for funding the cost of the approved changes-the subject to which the Court now turns. The State asserts it does not object to restructuring the magnet schools but does object to paying costs associated with magnet school enrollment in excess of the seating capacities set forth 3 Docket no. 3269. 4 Docket no. 3276. 5 Docket nos. 3292 \u0026 3293. 6 Docket no. 3296. 3 - in the settlement agreement. 7 Part II of the settlement agreement states, in pertinent part, as follows: D. Restrictions on Funding Magnet Schools The State will have no further obligation to contribute any additional funds to magnet schools other than under paragraph II.E. below. . . . Any reference to the six existing magnet schools in this settlement shall mean, for funding purposes, up to their present seating capacities. Those seating capacities are as follows: Carver 613 Williams 515 Gibbs 351 Booker 660 Mann 935 Parkview 991 E. Continuation of Existing Funding In addition to any payment described elsewhere in this agreement, the State will continue to pay the following costs: (1) The State's portion of magnet school operational costs for the six existing magnet schools (Gibbs, Booker, Carver, Parkview, Mann and Williams) .... Despite the funding limitation included in the settlement agreement, LRSD argues the State is estopped from refusing to pay its share of costs associated with the approved changes because two members of the MRC, who represent the Arkansas Department of Education, voted that each District and the State would share in paying for the increased costs. 8 The Court disagrees that under a theory of estoppel, the State must provide more funding for magnet schools than required by the settlement agreement. For an estoppel theory to apply, \"the party who is to be estopped, or one in privity with that party, must have asserted a fact or a claim, or made a promise, that another party relied on .... \"Maitland v. University of Minnesota, 43 F.3d 357, 364 (8th Cir. 1994). Additionally, \"estoppel is an equitable doctrine, and 7 Docket no. 3276 8 Docket no. 3293. 4 it should not be given effect beyond what is necessary to accomplish justice between the parties.\" Id The Court does not find that justice requires invoking an estoppel theory in the present situation or that the State (by proxy) asserted it would fund more magnet school seats than required under the settlement agreement. Alternatively, LRSD moves the Court to modify the parties' settlement agreement with the State \"to the extent necessary to implement MR.C's decisions.\" In 1991, the Eighth Circuit explained that this Court may approve modifications of the parties' consent decree when proposed modifications merely alter details that do not affect the parties' substantive commitments to desegregation. Little Rock Sch. Dist. , 949 F.2d 253, 255 (81h Cir. 1991). Ordinarily, parties should consent to such minor changes, but \"if a party refuses to consent and the moving party has a reasonable basis for its request, the court should modify the decree.\" - Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 112 S. Ct. 748, 760 n.7 (1992). A different standard applies when the parties dispute a proposed modification that alters a basic agreement among the parties. In these cases, a party may obtain relief from a consent decree when it is no longer equitable that the decree should have prospective application, \"not when it is no longer convenient to live with the terms of the consent decree.\" Rufo, 112 S. Ct. at 760. \"Accordingly a party seeking modification of a consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree.\" Rufo, 112 S. Ct. at 760; also see Little Rock School Dist. v. Pulaski Cty. Special Sch. Dist. , 56 F.3d 905, 914 (8th Cir. 1995). A party seeking modification may meet its initial burden by showing a significant change in factual conditions or the law. See id The Court finds that under the parties' settlement agreement, the State may not be 5 required to fund more than 4,065 magnet school seats. This proviso constitutes a basic agreement among the parties, not a dispensable detail. LRSD asserts the Court should modify the agreement, to the extent necessary to implement restructuring of the magnet schools, because the magnet schools promote desegregation. However, the Court finds that LRSD's general assertion falls short of establishing that significant changes in fact or law warrant revision of the provision limiting the State's funding to 4,065 magnet school seats. Finally, LRSD urges that the Court should at least require that the State continue funding the total number of magnet school seats stipulated in the settlement agreement (4,065). Under LRSD's interpretation of the agreement, the State must fund at least 77 new seats at Parkview, to offset the reduction in seats at Booker, Carver, Gibbs, and Williams, and insure the State continues to fund a total of 4,065 seats.9 The State asserts that the settlement agreement limits the State's funding obligations to costs associated with a maximum number of seats for each school: 613 seats at Carver, 515 seats at Williams, 351 seats at Gibbs, 660 seats at Booker, 935 seats at Mann, and 991 seats at Parkview.10 The State maintains that under the settlement agreement, the stipulated number of seats for each school is fixed and does not vary according to changes in the number of seats in other schools. The Court has concluded it lacks a proper basis to increase the total number of magnet ' school seats the State must fund beyond 4,065. However, it isnot clear whether the number of stipulated seats for each individual school, as set forth in the settlement agreement, involves a substantive commitment (which may not be modified absent a showing of significant change in fact or law) or a detail (which may be modified when a reasonable basis for modification exists). 9 See table, supra page 3. 10 Docket no. 3276, page 3. 6 The Court requests that the parties brief the Court regarding this issue. m. THEREFORE, no party having objected to MR.C's request for approval to change the interdistrict magnet schools' grade structure and seat numbers, the Court hereby approves the proposed changes. The Court's approval does not extend to the Committee's proposals for funding. FURTHER, the Court declines increasing the total number of magnet school seats funded by the State, and to this extent, LRSD's motion to modify the parties' settlement agreement with the State is hereby DENIED IN PART [docket no. 3292]. FURTHER, the Court directs the parties to brief the Court regarding whether under the settlement agreement, the stipulated number of state-funded seats for individual magnet schools may vary (providing the total number of state-funded seats remains at 4,065) without disrupting the substantive commitments contained in the agreement. To this extent, LRSD's motion to modify the parties' settlement agreement with the State is hereby HELD IN ABEYANCE [docket no. 3292]. FURTHER, the parties have to and including 60 days from entry of this Order, to submit the requested briefs. ~ - ~ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS~DAY OF ,\u003c , 1999 ~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN ~:=ce WITH RULE se AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ~ i./:;\u003e:-CJ1 BYJiZC:...i .---- 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN 2000 The PCSSD for its motion, states: NOV 1 8 1999 OfflCEOF DESEGREGATION MDNITORJUB PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS 1. The PCSSD petitioned for unitary status on March 25, 1999. 2. By order dated July 19, 1999, this Court ruled that the PCSSD had not achieved unitary status. 3. Appended to the PCSSD petition for unitary status was a document entitled Pulaski County Special School District Post Unitary Commitments. While Joshua opposed the PCSSD petition for unitary status, it, in the words of this Court, \"embraced\" the PCSSD post unitary commitments and, except for the issue concerning the duration of the commitments, agreed that the commitments could serve as a new or amended desegregation plan. 139757-v1 \\ 4. This Court has frequently encouraged the parties to modify their desegregation plans to make them more workable, has elicited testimony from court experts to assist the parties regarding issues being monitored by the district court and has approved a new Little Rock plan that is very similar to proposed Plan 2000. Further, the district court's finding that the PCSSD is not yet unitary is at least a de facto finding that its plan warrants modification. 5. The PCSSD converted the post unitary commitments to \"Plan 2000\" which was considered by and unanimously approved by the PCSSD Board of Directors on November 4, 1999. 6. Plan 2000 was previously considered by the Court and the parties as the PCSSD Post Unitary Commitments and was furnished to all parties before the PCSSD - Board action. 7. The PCSSD submits that Plan 2000 is constitutional, workable and fair to Joshua Class members and that it comports with the requirements of this and the Court of Appeals' standards for approval. 8. Attached to this motion as Exhibit A is a copy of Plan 2000. Exhibit Bis a letter dated November 2, 1999, detailing the changes which converted the Commitments to Plan 2000. Exhibit C is a proposed notice for publication to Joshua Class members and Exhibit D is a proposed order for the consideration of this Court. 9. This motion is accompanied by a memorandum brief which fully explains and supports the relief sought herein. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays that this Court give tentative approval to Plan 2000, that it order publication of the notice attached as Exhibit C, that it assign a closing 139757-v1 2 date for comments to be submitted to the United States District Court clerk and that, thereafter, it approve Plan 2000 as submitted and dismiss the PCSSO petition for unitary status without prejudice. Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 0) ty Special CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On November_!_!_, 1999, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown OOM Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 139757-v1 3 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 A. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAN 2000 DA TED November 4, 1999 Scope of This Plan (1) This Plan shall supersede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders in Pulaski County Special School District, U.S.D.C. No. LR-C-82-866, and all consolidated cases related to the desegregation of the Pulaski County Special School District with the following exceptions: (a) The Pulaski County School Desegregation case \"Settlement Agreement\" as revised on September 28, 1989; (b) The Magnet School Stipulation dated February 27, 1987; (c) Order dated September 3, 1986, pertaining to the Magnet Review Committee; (d) The M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986; and ( e) Orders of the district court and the court of appeals interpreting or enforcing sections (a) through (d) above to the extent not inconsistent with this Plan. B. General Obligation PCSSD shall in good faith exercise its best efforts to comply with the Constitution, to provide that no person is discriminated against on the basis of race, color, or ethnicity in the operation of the PCSSD, and to provide an equal educational opportunity for all students attending PCSSD schools. C. Assignment of Students (1) The PCSSD shall continue to implement the current standards for the assignment of students to schools within the district. The PCSSD shall inform the Joshua lntervenors of the documents which set forth the details of the existing plan. This notice shall be provided within 30 days of the court's approval of this Plan. (2) The PCSSD shall submit not later than October 15 in each school year a report concerning one race classes. The report shall set forth for each such class: (i) the school, (ii) the class including the grade level, (iii) the racial make-up of~th~ec-la~ss, --- ijQt..-r ;. ,~. - '1f\" ::::..~.: ~ -. ... ~~-'/) :: : . ~if.~;., 1367~v1 (iv) a description of steps taken to eliminate the particular one race class and the reason(s) why this proved to be infeasible. The PCSSD shall submit not later than March 1 of each school year a similar, supplemental report concerning any one race classes in courses commencing in the second semester of the school year. D. Advanced Placement, Gifted and Talented and Honors Programs Not later than 45 days after the court's approval of this Plan, the PCSSD shall provide to the Joshua lntervenors the standards then in place for selecting secondary students for and educating them in advanced placement, gifted and talented, and honors programs, including standards to promote racial diversity in these programs. The PCSSD shall include in this submission notices which are used to inform staff members of the relevant standards. E. Student Assignment; lnterdlstrlct Schools (1) PCSSD and LRSD shall operate interdistrict schools in accordance with the following: 136743-v1 (a) PCSSD lnterdistrict Schools. PCSSD shall operate Baker Elementary, Clinton Elementary, Crystal Hill Elementary and any new elementary school which may be constructed in the Chenal Valley area as lnterdistrict Schools. (b) LRSD lnterdistrict Schools. LRSD shall operate King Elementary, Romine Elementary and Washington Elementary as lnterdistrict Schools. ( c) Racial Composition. The ideal composition at the interdistrict schools shall be as close to 50%-50% as possible with the majority race of the host district remaining the majority race at the interdistrict school, except that Baker School shall not be subject to this requirement. (d) Reserved Seats. PCSSD shall reserve at least 200 seats at Clinton Elementary and up to 399 seats at Crystal Hill Elementary for interdistrict transfer students from LRSD. The District shall also reserve up to half of the seats for LRSD black students in any new Chenal Valley School. ( e) Recruitment. PCSSD and LRSD agree to implement programs at interdistrict schools designed to attract 2 (f) (g) interdistrict transfer students and to work cooperatively to recruit interdistrict transfer students to interdistrict schools. Outside Students. lnterdistrict schools shall be open to students who reside outside Pulaski County where the acceptance of the transfer will assist the interdistrict school in achieving its ideal racial composition. Transportation. Transportation shall be provided by the PCSSD for interdistrict transfers from Pulaski County to interdistrict schools. F. Discipline (1) The PCSSD will continue to gather data which allows a full assessment of its success in achieving its objective of eliminating racial disparities in the imposition of school discipline. As a foundation for this effort, disciplinary records shall be kept on each student concerning the nature of any discipline imposed (suspension, Saturday school, expulsion, etc.); the teacher and staff member involved; and the school, race, and sex of the student. (2) Not later than 45 days after the court's approval of this Plan, the Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation shall submit to the Joshua lntervenors, for comment, proposed criteria for identifying, from the data collected: (i) teachers and other staff members who are experiencing problems which require attention; (ii) schools which have atypically high discipline rates; and (iii) schools which have atypically high racial disparities in discipline. The Joshua lntervenors shall have 21 days to provide comments on these proposed criteria. The PCSSD shall then complete the criteria promptly. (3) The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation and the Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel shall thereafter provide for and participate in specific efforts to work with teachers and other staff members and the personnel of schools, identified pursuant to the criteria set forth in paragraph 2, to promote achievement of the goal of eliminating racial disparities in school discipline. The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation shall maintain records showing the specific steps undertaken. ( 4) PCSSD shall conduct a comprehensive study of the disciplining of African-American students, particularly male students, at the secondary level. The participants (a minimum of twelve (12)), one-half designated by the Joshua lntervenors and one-half by PCSSO and the PACT and PASS, shall consider the causes for the high rates of discipline for African-American students and possible remedies. The panel 3 136748-v1 shall, among other things: review discipline records to secure an understanding of the circumstances in which African-American students are disciplined; interview and\\or survey African-American students regarding their experiences in the system generally and in the discipline process; and consider the possibility of a relationship between unmet academic needs and discipline rates. The written study shall be completed not later than 150 days after court approval of this Plan and shall provide suggestions for prevention and intervention measures. (5) The PCSSD shall develop a specific initiative to reduce the rates of discipline in the PCSSD shown in ODM's report dated March 18, 1998. This initiative shall be implemented not later than 150 days after the court's approval of this Plan. (6) PCSSD shall adhere to the policies set forth in the Handbook for Student Conduct and Discipline, as revised after consultation with the Joshua lntervenors, PACT and PASS, to provide that students are disciplined in a fair and equitable manner. The Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel shall be responsible for determining the fairness of student disciplinary decisions. He will delegate the student hearing function to a single hearing officer who will consider the appeal brought by parents and the position of the administrator making the recommendation and then make a decision based upon equitable factors. An aggrieved student may appeal to the Superintendent of Schools. The Superintendent may review the matter or refer it to the school board for action. The committee approach which utilizes school principals in the student appeal process has been discontinued and will not be reinstituted. G. Multicultural Education (1) The PCSSD shall continue its efforts to infuse multicultural instruction in all curriculum areas. All phases of a school's environment (~. instructional materials, lesson plans and lessons, library contents, bulletin boards, extracurricular activities, school assemblies, speaker programs, and food services) shall reflect the system's Plan to multicultural education. (2) A principal activity of the Coordinator for Multicultural Education and the Coordinator's office shall be on-site visits to individual schools to determine whether the system's policy and the provisions of this Plan are being implemented in fact. The Coordinator shall maintain records permitting an evaluation of the status of implementation at each school visited. H. School Facilities (1) The PCSSD shall prepare, with the help of consultants, as necessary, a plan so that existing school facilities are clean, safe, attractive and equal. The plan shall address alternatives for funding its implementation. The Board of School Directors shall approve a plan not later than 150 days after the court's approval of this Plan. The 4 136748-v1 Joshua lntervenors shall be given a 14 day period to comment on the content of the plan prior to its adoption. (2) An elementary school, located around 145th Street, and a middle school or junior high school in the Crystal Hill\\Maumelle area will be built. The Board will address the development of a plan for new school construction during the term of this Plan if funds are sufficient, including its funding, and report its conclusions not later than 150 days after the court's approval of this Plan. Moreover, the PCSSO shall not close schools which are located in predominantly African-American areas absent reasons of compelling necessity (which does not include the opposition of white patrons to attending such schools). (3) The PCSSD shall notify the Joshua lntervenors of plans for constructing new schools and for adding capacity to existing schools. The notice shall identify the capacity of the proposed facility, the area of the system to be served, and the projected impact on the racial make-up of the students in each school expected to be affected by the new construction. The Joshua lntervenors shall have a period of 14 days in which to provide input concerning each such proposal. I. Scholarships Within 30 days from the date that the LRSD successfully establishes its own scholarship program, PCSSD shall establish a bi-racial committee to explore a program for providing college scholarships to designated PCSSO students. J. School Resources PCSSO shall design and carry out, in consultation with the Joshua lntervenors, a study to determine whether school resources are allocated equitably among the schools of the district. The resources assessed may include such factors as pupil\\teacher ratio; pupil\\staff ratio; square feet per pupil; percentage of staff with a masters degree and nine or more years of experience; the turnover rate of certified staff; school size: computer\\pupil ratio; per pupil expenditure; volunteer hours per pupil; and donations per pupil. The study shall contain recommendations, where appropriate, to address any problems identified. K. Special Education (1) Not later than 45 days after the court's approval of this Plan, the PCSSD shall provide to the Joshua lntervenors the standards then in place for: (i) stressing intervention strategies and regular class modifications in an effort to prevent inappropriate referrals of black males and kindergarten students; (ii) monitoring the folders of all kindergarten students and black students who are being considered as in need of special education under IDEA and Section 504 to insure nondiscrimination in 5 136748-v1 evaluation and placement. The PCSSD shall include in this submission materials which are used to inform staff members of the relevant standards. (2) The Director of Special Education shall develop a specific plan for additional monitoring each year, by his\\her staff, of schools where there are atypically high racial disparities in special education classification, generally or as to black male students. The PCSSD shall provide a copy of this plan to the Joshua lntervenors, which shall include criteria for identifying schools for monitoring. L. Staff (1) The PCSSD shall recruit applicants for each available administrative position, by internal and external means, in a manner designed to communicate, broadly, its availability and to develop a racially diverse pool of applicants. The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation shall, with the cooperation of the Assistant Superintendent for Personnel, be informed of the make-up of each such applicant pool and they shall have the authority to direct that additional recruitment take place prior to the offering of the position to a particular applicant. (2) The PCSSD shall engage in recruitment so that new teachers are selected from a racially diverse pool of applicants. The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation shall monitor the recruitment process so that recruitment is extensive and sustained, and the hiring process so that no policy; practice, or custom has the purpose or the effect of imposing an upward limit on the proportion of black teachers. (3) The PCSSD shall continue to implement programs, policies and\\or procedures which result in an increase in the number of African-American earty childhood teachers, primary grade teachers, and secondary core teachers, including offering incentives for African-American teachers to obtain certification in these areas, and to assign those teachers to the PCSSD schools where the greatest disparity exists. (4) The PCSSD will allocate teachers and other professional staff in a manner which avoids the racial identification of schools. M. Student Achievement (1) The PCSSD shall implement the plans designed to improve student achievement, recommended by Dr. Stephen Ross, and shall work with Dr. Ross in their implementation. See Attachment (plans). (2) The PCSSD shall continue to implement its home-school counselor program. 6 136748-v1 N. Monitoring (1) The Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation shall: (i) develop a plan so that he (or she) and his (or her) staff focus their monitoring and compliance efforts on the specific elements of this Plan; and (ii) provide the Joshua lntervenors within 30 days of the court's approval of this Plan a list, geared to the sections of this Plan, identifying the staff member or members with particular responsibilities for its implementation and the position held by each. (2) Upon reasonable notice, the Joshua lntervenors shall have the opportunity: (i) to examine and secure copies of records relating to the PCSSO's compliance with this Plan, including records identified in this Plan, and (ii) to meet with the Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation or a staff member responsible for a particular part of the implementation of the Plan. 136748-v1 (3) The PCSSO shall submit statistical reports showing the following: (a) The enrollment in each school by race; (b) The enrollment in gifted and talented programs, honors programs, and advanced placement classes, by school and by race; (c) The make-up of special education programs: (i) by disability category, including Section 504, by race, and by sex; and (ii) by school, by race, and by sex; provided that the system may comply with this reporting requirement by providing copies of materials submitted to ADE, as long as they include all information designated in this paragraph; (d) For each school and the system, the number of instances of each form of discipline, by race and by sex; for each school and the system, the number of students receiving each form of discipline, by race. and by sex; (e) The racial make-up, in each school, of (i) the administrators, (ii) the faculty, (iii) other professional staff, and (iv) support staff; (f) The racial make-up, by category, of the various categories of administrators, faculty, support staff, and other workers employed in the PCSSO. 7 The information in all sub-paragraphs other than sub-paragraph (d) shall be submitted not later than November 1 of each year, and the information in sub-paragraph (d) twice a year, not later than 30 days after the end of each semester. N. Continuing Jurisdiction (1) General Rule. The district court shall have continuing jurisdiction to address issues regarding compliance with and modifications of this Plan. Nothing in this Plan shall affect the district court's jurisdiction to enforce the Plan in the manner required by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. (2) Process for Raising compliance Issues. Before requesting the district court to exercise its jurisdiction with regard to a compliance issue, the Joshua lntervenors shall follow the procedures set forth below. 136748-v1 (a) Joshua shall as soon as reasonably practicable give the PCSSO Superintendent or his designee specific written notice which includes the following: (i) the paragraph(s) of the Plan at issue; (ii) the names of all students involved, if any; (iii) the names of all PCSSD agents or employees involved, if any; (iv) all facts of which the Joshua lntervenors are aware relevant to the compliance issue: and (v) a copy of all documents in the Joshua lntervenors' possession relevant to the compliance issue. (b) PCSSD shall conduct a reasonable investigation of the alleged noncompliance and shall provide the Joshua lntervenors a written response within a reasonable period not to exceed 30 days from the receipt of written notice from the Joshua I ntervenors or such later time as agreed. 8 (c) If the Joshua lntervenors are unsatisfied with PCSSD's response, the Joshua lntervenors shall within 15 days of receipt of PCSSD's response submit the compliance issue to the Department of Justice, Community Relations Service, for facilitation of an agreement between the parties. (d) If the compliance i "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1395","title":"Report: ''Achievement Disparity Between the Races in the Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1999-10-26"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Standards","Educational statistics","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Achievement Disparity Between the Races in the Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1395"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["128 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1718","title":"Court filings: District Court, the districts' reply to Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Achievement Disparity between the Races in the Little Rock School District (LRSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1999-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Standards","Educational law and legislation","School management and organization","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, the districts' reply to Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Achievement Disparity between the Races in the Little Rock School District (LRSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1718"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["75 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  EDWARD L. WRIGHT (1903 - 1077) ROBERTS . LINDSEY (1013 - 1001) ISAAC A. SCOTT. JR. JOHN G. LILE WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN 0 . DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS HENRY KIMBERLY WOOD TUCKER RAY F. COX , JR. GORDON S. RATHER, JR. TERRY L. MATHEWS DAVID M. POWELL ROGER A . GLASGOW C. DOUGLAS BUFORD . JR . PATRICK J . GOSS ALSTON JENNINGS, JR . JOHN R. TISDALE KATHLYN GRAVES M, SAMUEL JONES Ill JOHN WILLIAM SPIVEY Ill LEE J. MULDROW N.M. NORTON CHARLES C. PRICE CHARLES T . COLEMAN JAMES J . GLOVER EOWIN L. LOWTHER, JR . CHARLES L . SCHLUMBERGER WALTER E. MAY GREGORY T. JONES H. KEITH MORRISON BETTINA E. BROWNSTEIN WALTER McSPADDEN ROGER 0 . ROWE NANCY BELLHOUSE MAY Mr. John Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: PCSSD Dear Counsel and Ms. Brown: 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 2200 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201  3699 (501) 371 -0808 FAX (501) 376-9442 WEBSITE: www .wlj .com OF COUNSEL ALSTON JENNINGS RONALD A. MAY M, TODD WOOD Writ er 's Direct Dial No . 501 -212 - 1273 mJonesCwlJ .com October 12, 1999 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark TROY A. PRICE PATRICIA A . SIEVERS JAMES M. MOODY, JR. KATHRYN A . PR YOR J . MARK DAVIS CLAIRE SHOWS HANCOCK KEVIN W. KENNEDY JERRY J . SALLINGS FRED M. PERKINS 111 WILLIAM STUART JACKSON MICHAEL 0 . BARNES STEPHEN R. LANCASTER JUDY ROBINSON WILBER BETSY MEACHAM KYLE R. WILSON C. TAO BOHANNON DONS. McKINNEY MICHELE SIMMONS ALLGOOD KRISTI M. MOODY J. CHARLES DOUGHERTY M. SEAN HATCH PHYLLIS M. McKENZIE ELISA MASTERSON WHITE JANE M. FAULKNER ROBERT W. GEORGE J. ANDREW VINES JUSTIN T. ALLEN R. MARGARET DOBSON 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 f1CT 1' -1 1cog. .., V , v v .CffiCECf DESffiRffiATlOH .~NrmruM; Enclosed is a copy of the Districts' reply to ADE's response to the Districts' motion for prejudgment interest which is being filed today. MSJ/ao Encl. 132537-v1 Cordially, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP ~:~,Ill IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - _EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. THE DISTRICTS' REPLY TO ADE'S RESPONSE TO THE DISTRICTS' MOTION FOR PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The State opposes payment of pre-judgment interest on two grounds. It resists first because technically \"no judgment\" has been entered. The fact remains, however, that the Districts were compelled to resort to the Court seeking payment of the teacher retirement and health insurance benefits due for 1998-1999. That motion was filed on May 11, 1999, and the State responded on May 25, 1999, and in that response the State resisted making payment. Indeed, the State did not finally distribute the requested funds until September of 1999. That the State technically, and finally, made these payments before entry of an actual judgment is immaterial. The fact remains that resort to the Court was necessary to obtain the funds and, absent some consequence to the State, such as pre-judgment interest, the State has no incentive to make such payments on a timely basis but, rather, unfairly benefits by delaying payment so long as it can arguably do so. 132185-v1 The State further resists on the notion that Exhibit 504 requires \"full-year data\" before the State can make any calculation of any kind. This argument is plainly nonsense. As Exhibit 504 is structured, it is simply a mathematical equation into which any data obtained at any time can be inserted to arrive at an outcome. At bottom, the State's argument is really that they do not wish to activate Exhibit 504 until they have every last bit of data in hand so that they can delay payment for as long as possible. Further, while the Districts did agree to use Exh,bit 504 for their darnage calculations, they did not agree to wait until three months after the end of the fiscal year for the damages to in fact be calculated. That is precisely the thrust of the other aspect of the Districts' motion, still before the Court, wherein they seek payment \"on the same monthly schedule as equalization funding using prior year average participation numbers and current state minimum required numbers, with adjustments to be made in June of each year using current year actual participation numbers.\" (ADE's Response dated August 19, 1999, at page 1.) To pay in this fashion would be no different from the current method pursuant to which M to M payments are made. Payments are made by the State on a monthly basis and then adjusted at the end of the year to account for any actual variances occasioned by the Lise of estimated participation. The bottom line remains that these three districts are required to make their own teacher retirement and health insurance payments on a monthly basis and the State should not be allowed to profit at the expense of the Districts by, in some instances, making payment more than a year after the initial payments are made by the Districts. 132185-v1 2 Accordingly, this Court should award pre-judgment interest to partially - compensate the three Pulaski Districts for the delay in making the 1998-1999 payments and should grant the Districts' motion dated May 11, 1999, to require future payments to be made on a monthly schedule. Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 By--'~,,...::;.~=---~__:;:::;-~-----Special CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On October I 2-, 1999, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clari\u003c - 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street - Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 132185-v1 3 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street  _ First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 132185-v1 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * R Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OCT t. 5 f999 C .V~ OCT 18 1999 (rJfFICE OF KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * flJl!SHfflRiATION MONITORING Intervenors. * ORDER Before the Court is the request of the Magnet Review Committee (\"MRC\") for approval - of the interdistrict magnet schools' final budget for the 1998-1999 school year. The MRC communicated the final budget to the Court in a letter dated June 30, 1999 (attached). The letter also contains a proposed budget for the 1999-2000 school year; however, the Court will address the proposed budget in a separate Order. The Court will allow the parties to and including 10 days from entry of this Order to object to MRC's final budget for 1998-1999. Should no objections be filed within the time allowed, the Court will enter an Order approving the budget. ' _./k-- IT IS SO ORDERED THIS /.:; DAY OF OCTOBER, 1999 CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT rHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPUAN~i:W?:~ 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP OH I I SJ , l!JV tt::::: ' Magnet Review Committee 1920 North Main Street, Suite 101  North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 (501) 758-0156 {Phone}  (501) 758-5366 {Fax}  magnet@magnetschool.com {E-mail} June 30, 1999 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U. S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 7220 l Dear Judge Wright: At its June 22, .1999 special-called meeting, the Magnet Review Committee, by formal motion and 4-0 vote (North Little Rock and Joshua lntervenors representatives were not present), approved the interdistrict magnet schools' actual budget for the six original magnet schools for the 1998-99 school year (Draft l ). FINAL 1998-99 STIPULATED ORIGINAL MAGNET SCHOOLS BUDGET: The total amount budgeted, $20,146,910, is based on a per pupil expenditure of $5,127.00, calculated from an average third-quarter enrollment of 3,929.86 students. This budget reflects an increase of $473.00 per student over the 1997-98 budget, with the third year of the five-year proposed program improvement plan included. This final 1998-99 budget reflects actual figures and takes into account the variables (teacher retirement and health insurance changes) that were uncertain when the proposed budget was submitted in June, 1998. As you know, in correspondence dated May 7, 1999, the Magnet Review Committee requested a change in the magnet school grade configurations beginning with the 1999- 2000 school year. As described in that May 7, 1999 letter, the changes result in an additional 132 magnet school seats. At its June 22, 1999 meeting, the Magnet Review  Committee approved the proposed budget for the 1999-2000 school year for the six original magnet schools which reflected costs associated with the additional seats (Draft 1 ). PROPOSED 1999-2000 STIPULATED ORIGINAL MAGNET SCHOOLS BUDGET: The total proposed budget for the 1999-2000 school year is $22,941,363, which results in a per-pupil expenditure of $5,648 and an increase of $521.00 per student over the 1998-99 actual budget. Salary negotiations are in progress, and it should be noted that these negotiations may have an impact on the 1999-2000 proposed budget. It is the intention of the Magnet Review Committee, therefore, to submit this budget with the recognition that some flexibility may be necessary. The Magnet Review Committee respectfully requests the Court's review and approval of the 1998-99 finalized budget, as well as the proposed 1999-2000 budget, both attached herewith. \"Pursue the Possibilities of Magnet School Enrollment\" The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -2- June 30, 1999 The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the original magnet schools. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise stringent oversight of the magnet schools' budget in an effort to achieve and ensure efficient management and cost containment to the greatest extent possible. Sincerely, ~ Sadie Mitchell, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee SM/DGC:sl Attachments - Actual 1998-99 Original Magnet Schools Budget (Draft l) Proposed 1999-2000 Original Magnet Schools Budget (Draft l) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - Office of Desegregation Monitoring ,  Ann S. Brown Federal Monitor ACHIEVEMENT DISPARITY BETWEEN THE RACES IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT October 26, 1999 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Norman W. Marshall Associate Monitor EAST~~~lb~s~ ~SAS OCT 2 6 1999 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By: ______ _,,.D..,..E.,.,.P-,,,C-r-,Lt:_,.Rm,K . Polly Ramer Office Manager DESEGREGATiON iliO:JITOfiiNG ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS October 28, 1999 M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 NationsBank Building 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P .A 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mark Pryor Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3 493 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyons \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Towers 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. l , et al. USDC No. LR-C-82-866 Dear Counselor: Enclosed for your records is a copy of the Notice of Filing in the above styled matter that is being filed this date with the Clerk of the Court. TGG/nc encl. 1 Sincerely, ---/=:- -= Timo y Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street Sui te 200  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (50 1) 682-2007  FAX (50 1) 682-8084 Internet Website  http ://www.ag.state.ar.us/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITnE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for October, 1999. oc, 2 g 1999 OrrlCt Or otStG~~i\\Otl i,,om10Rma Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General T 95019 Assistant A. _____ , General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education  This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_258","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1999-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School attendance","Education--Evaluation"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/258"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nWORKSHEET Interdistrict Transfers 1999-00 Enrollment Report The first fax (1/4/00) from Vivian Roberts at ADE was incomplete. This was apparent due to the low numbers ofM-to-M sent by both LRSD and NLRSD. I called Vivian (on 1/5/00) to alert her to the problem and she suggested I call the districts directly. When speaking to Mark Milhollen on the phone, he pointed out that the current figures included the LRSD totals and the NLRSD totals, but the PCSSD numbers were handwritten. Using the totals from the two districts we had at that time plus the PCSSD numbers that Houston Yewell sent over on 1/6/99, we were able to do the math below and arrive at both sending and receiving for all three districts. As of 1999-00, ADE is no longer requiring districts to furnish both sending and receiving data. Each district submits their receiving data only. ADE combines the reports on students received and assigns the totals in the M-to-M sent column. M-to-M Transfers LRSD received from: NLRSD PCSSD PCSSD received from LRSD NLRSD NLRSD received from LRSD PCSSD 28 423 - 28 = 395 1071 149 30 356 - 30 = 326 See 1 si sheet submitted by ADE See Supt. Quarterly Attendance Report from PCSSD See 1 si sheet submitted by ADE Total 28 + 395 + 1071 + 149 + 30 + 326 = 1999 Magnet Transfers to LRSD from: PCSSD 980 See either 1st or 2nd sheet submitted by ADE NLRSD Total M-to-M Summary: LRSD received LRSD sent out NLRSD received NLRSD sent out PCSSD received PCSSD sent out 501 980 + 501 = 1481 28 + 395 = 423 1071 + 30 = 1101 30 + 326 = 356 28 + 149 = 177 1071 + 149 = 1220 395 + 326 = 721 Sum taken from table 1 M-to-M and Magnet Summary LRSD received 423 + 1481 = I 904 LRSD sent out 1101 NLRSD received 356 NLRSD sent out 177 + 501 = 678 PCSSD received 1220 PCSSD sent out 721 + 980 = 1701 Total received 1904 + 356 + 1220 = 3480 INTERDISTRICT TRANSFERS Twelve Year Comparison Prepared by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring The charts in this section show the number of students transferring from one Pulaski Count_v school district to another for desegregation purposes. The desegregation plans distinguish two types of interdistrict tram,fers: majority-to-minority (M-to-M) and magnet school transfers, both of which are displayed below. We obtained the number of transfers listed in each of the eleven years examined from the Superintendent's Quarterly Attendance Reports, which each school district submits quarter(v to the Arkansas Department of Education. Those reports did not include the information reflected on our summary cha,ts, which we calculated by adding the corresponding numbers found in the quarter(y reports. In the following table that displays M-to-M transfers, the \"--\" in each yearji'Oln 1988-89 to 1994-9 5 indicates that no students transfe,red between the NLRSD and the PCSSD during those years because the racial balance of the districts' enrollment precluded M-to-M transfers. The table of magnet transfers below shows that on(v the LRSD received magnet students, because all six of the stipulation magnet schools are located in the LRSD. LASO received from NLASO 6 7 96 106 120 88 74 65 43 40 30 ,2 A t)4o0 PCSSO 33 53 132 255 256 409 419 333 446 399 396 _--:i,q~ J PCSSO received from /0'7/ Di~ ~ LASO 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,152 1,161 1,206 1,213 ,~ _ NLASO 24 48 102 134 IL/ Cf NLASO received from 3o' II LASO 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 195 157 100 55 ~~(p/ PCSSO 71 162 213 299 ?.,:J ( 0 -\n..., TOTAL 202 428 758 954 1,395 1,637 1,850 1,840 2,017 2,060 2. 121 IJ.tf-Si,.__.I....., To LASO from: PCSSD 927 966 908 983 1,004 1,007 979 961 992 953 967 q9o. vv NLASO 350 439 481 509 505 523 469 482 480 522 506 ,\ni,j ' vv TOTAL 1,277 1,405 1,389 1,492 1,509 1,530 1,448 1,443 1,472 1,475 1,473 I'! 1 I ' v Page C-74 T'4{elve Year Comparison of M-to-M and Magnet Transfers The data on the previous page is summari::::eodn the following charts, which we calculated by adding the numbers that correspond to the annual interdistrict transfers in the M-to-M and magnet categories shown above. LASO: Received 39 60 228 361 376 497 493 398 489 439 426 '-f ,).3--, Sent Out 163 368 530 593 1,019 1,140 1,357 1,347 1,318 1,306 1,268 llOI NLRSO: Received 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 266 319 313 354 3:5/p,. 1--\" Sent Out 6 7 96 106 120 88 74 89 91 142 164 /17 1 V PCSSO: Received 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,176 1,209 1,308 1,347 11 .\ni.C.. Ov Sent Out 33 53 132 255 256 409 419 404 608 612 695 ,~l I v LASO: Received 1,316 1,465 1,617 1,853 1,885 2,027 1,941 1,841 1,961 1,914 1,899 1qo-ti Sent Out 163 368 530 593 1,019 1,140 1,357 1,347 1,318 1,306 1,268 IJnl  NLRSO: Received 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 266 319 313 354 3 '!i.fJI v Sent Out 356 446 577 615 625 611 543 571 571 664 670 (o73' # PCSSD: Received 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,176 1,209 1,308 1,347 I\n},2d)- V Sent Out 960 1,019 1,040 1,238 1,260 1,416 1,398 1,365 1,600 1,565 1,662 1101, V TOTAL RECEIVED 1,479 1,833 2,147 2,446 2,904 3,167 3,298 3,283 3,489 3,535 3,600 31\u0026amp;) Page C-75 INTERDISTRICT TRANSFERS Twelve Year Comparison Prepared by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring The charls in this section show the number of students transferring from one Pulaski County school district to another for desegregation purposes. The desegregation plans distinguish two types of interdistrict transfers: majority-to-minority (M-to-M) and magnet school transfers, both of which are displayed below. We obtained the number of transfers listed in each of the eleven years examined from the Superintendent's Quarterly Attendance Reports, which each school district submits quarterly to the Arkansas Department of Education. Those reports did not include the information reflected on our summary charls, which we calculated by adding the corresponding numbers found in the quarterly reports. In the following table that displays M-to-M transfers, the \"--\" in each year from 1988-89 to 1994-9 5 indicates that no students transferred between the NLRSD and the PCSSD during those years because the racial balance of the districts' enrollment precluded M-to-M transfers. The table of magnet transfers below shows that only the LRSD received magnet students, because all six of the stipulation magnet schools are located in the LRSD. LASO received from NLASO 6 7 96 106 120 88 74 65 43 40 30 ~ \u0026gt;~~3 PCSSO 33 53 132 255 256 409 419 333 446 399 396 39-5 PCSSO received from LRSO 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,152 1,161 1,206 1,213 /(')1/ \u0026gt; ,~\nJ.(:) NLASO 24 48 102 134 )~ NLASO received from LASO 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 195 157 100 55 30. ) Jf\nC,. PCSSO 71 162 213 299 3\n,1:. TOTAL 202 428 758 954 1,395 1,637 1,850 1,840 2,017 2,060 2,127 1999 To LASO from: PCSSO 927 966 908 983 1,004 1,007 979 961 992 953 967 r8o NLASO 350 439 481 509 505 523 469 482 480 522 506 'Sol TOTAL 1,277 1,405 1,389 1,492 1,509 1,530 1,448 1,443 1,472 1,475 1,473 1/~/ Page C-74 4A \u0026lt; I  Twelve Year Comparison of M-to-M and Magnet Transfers The data on the previous page is summarized on the following charts, which we calculated by adding the numbers that correspond to the annual interdistrict transfers in the M-to-M and magnet categories shown above. LRSD: Received 39 60 228 361 376 497 493 398 489 439 426 \u0026lt;/~3 Sent Out 163 368 530 593 1,019 1,140 1,357 1,347 1,318 1,306 1,268 J/0/ NLRSD: Received 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 266 319 313 354 3\nl, Sent Out 6 7 96 106 120 88 74 89 91 142 164 171 PCSSD: Received 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,176 1,209 1,308 1,347\n.\no Sent Out 33 53 132 255 256 409 419 404 608 612 695 7~/ LRSD: Received 1,316 1,465 1,617 1,853 1,885 2,027 1,941 1,841 1,961 1,914 1,899 J9c-Y Sent Out 163 368 530 593 1,019 1,140 1,357 1,347 1,318 1,306 1,268 //01 NLRSD: Received 30 117 138 217 271 285 277 266 319 313 354 3-sl Sent Out 356 446 577 615 625 611 543 571 571 664 670 ~ 7S\" PCSSD: Received 133 251 392 376 748 855 1,080 1,176 1,209 1,308 1,347 /~-\n).CJ Sent Out 960 1,019 1,040 1,238 1,260 1,416 1,398 1,365 1,600 1,565 1,662 /?OJ TOTAL RECEIVED 1,479 1,833 2,147 2,446 2,904 3,167 3,298 3,283 3,489 3,535 3,600 ..3.l/BC Page C-75 PUBLIC SCH FINANCE 5016829035 1999-00 1st Qtr ADM es of 12-17-99 from Clara Knolt. lea district name 49-01-000 Caddo HiRs School District 49-02-000 Mount Ida School District 49-04-000 Oden School District 50-04-000 Emmet School District 50-06-000 Prescott School District 50-08-000 Nevada School District 51-01-000 Deer School District 51-02-000 Jasper School District 51-03-000 Mount Judea School District 51-04-000 Western Grove School District 52-01-000 Bearden School District 52-04-000 Camden Fairview School Dist. 52-05-000 Harmony Grov~ School District 52-06-000 Stephens School District 53-01-000 East End School District 53-02-000 Perry-Casa School District 53-03-000 Penyville School District 54-01-000 Barton-Lexa School District 54-02-000 Elaine School District 54-03-000 Helena/ W.Hefena School Oist 54-04-000 Marvell School District 54\"-05-000 Lake View School District 55-01-000 Delight School District 55-02-000 Centerpoint School District 55-03-000 Kirby School District 55-04-000 Murfreesboro School District 56-02-000 Harrisburg School District 56-04-000 Marked Tree School District 56-05-000 Trumann School District 56-07-000 Weiner School District 56-08-000 East Poinsett Co. School Dist. 57-01-000 Acom School District 57-02-000 Hatfield School District 57-03-000 Mena School District 57--04-000 Van Cove School Oistr1ct 67-05-000 Wickes School District 58--01--000 Atkins School District 58-02-000 Dover School Dlstriet 58-03-000 Hector School District 58-04-000 Pottsville School District 58-05-000 Russellvllle School Dis1rtct 59-01-000 Des Arc School District 59-02-000 DeValls Bluff School District 59-03-000 Hazen School Oiwict 60-01-000 Little Rock School District 60-02-000 N. Little Rock Schoof District 60-03-000 Pulaski Co. Spec. School Dist 61-01--000 Biggers-R~no School District 61-02-000 Maynard School Distric't 233?1,. 1g 8'13tf. 31o ,~ 'l11... qs adm 623.12 560.32 246.22 304.74 1089.41 558.56 288.15 598.76 254 285.98 779.69 3514.22 848.03 419.6 700.64 165 958.66 747.76 487.73 3764.74 725.17 198.07 372.68 919.3 408.98 533.61 1042.62 806.82 1717.09 434.59 828.09 460.94 334.95 1867.16 445.81 558.4 1184.39 1366.7 780.09 979.41 5340.52 680.25 450.57 440.51 21008.71 8233.32 l14'ltoo 239.22 5:!7.98 I - 0100 magnet m to ms m to ms adm sent rec'd 2368.07 501.04 979.95 /I 00. 1\"3 ~ 422.66 (~ 355.93 L1 20.14 12.2.0.%o,-o :\u0026gt; 117. /'l.., \\ PUBLICS CHF INANCE 5016829035 1ggg.oo1 st Qtr ACM as of 12-17-99f rom Clara Knox. LI:A 6003 Is missing. lea dl$trtct name 49-01-000 caddo Hills School District 49-02000 Mount Ida School District 49-04-000 Oden School District 50-04-000 EmmetS ChooDl istriet 50-06-000 Prescott School District 50-08-000 Nevada School District 51-01-000 Deer School District 51-02-000 JasperS ChooDl istrict 51-03-000 Mount Judea School Distric:t 51-04-000 western Grove School District 52-01-000 Bearden School District 52-04-000 camoen Fairview School Dist 52-05-000 Harmony Grove School District 52-06-000 Stephens School Otstrtct 53-01-000 East End School District 53-02-000 Perry-casaS chOODI istrict 53-03-000 PerryvillSe choolO istric:t 54-()1-000 Barton-LexaS ChOODIi strict 54-02-000 Elaine School District 54-03-000 Helena/W .HelenaS choolD ist 54-04-000 Marvell School District 54.()5..()()0 Lake View School Olstrict 55-01-000 Delight School District 55-02-000 centerpoint Sehool Oistrlct 5~3-000 Kirby School District 55-04-000M urfreesboroS ChooDl istrict 56-02-000 Harrisburg School District 56-04-000 Marked Tree School District 56-05-000 Trumann School District 56-07-000 weiner School District 56-08-000 East Poinsettc o.S choolD isl 57-01-000 Acom SChOODIi sb'ict 57-02-000 Hatfield School District 57-03-000 Mena SChool Oislricl 57-04.000 Van Cave Sehool District 57-05-000 Wick.esS choo!D istrict 58-01-000 Atkins School District 58-02-000 Dover School Olstrict 58-03.000 Hector School District 58-04-000 PottsvHleS choolD istrict 58-05-000 Russellvt11Sec hoolD istrict 59-01-000 Des Arc School District 59-02-000 oevans Bluff Sehool District 59-03-000 HazenS ChooDl istrlc::t 60-01-000 Little Rod( School Dislrict 60-02-000 N. Little Rock School Oistr1ct 60-03-000 Pu18skCi o. Spee.S choolD ist 61-01-000 Biggers-Reyno School District 2.3.37G.7. g 8'13'f-.:H, H!'l11..ttS \":\no~\"\"~e._513)'l LfS'.' t 01/04 '00 1,-,1 Nn 7g~ n11n1 Post-It'\" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # of pages  \\ Co. Dept. Fax# 288.15 598.76 254 285.98 779.69 3514.22 848.03 419.6 700.64 165 958.66 747.76 487.73 3764.74 725.17 198.07 372.6B 919.3 408.9B 533.61 1042.62 806.82 1717.09 434.59 828.09 460.94 334.95 1867.16 445.81 558.4 1184.39 1368.7 780.09 979.41 5340.52 680.25 450.57 440.51 21008.71 8233.32 11~'itoo 239.22 .:,-,-,.no Co. o']llV\\ -J..D--Z-9 1Q99-001sQt tr ADMa s of 12-17-99fr om Clara Knox. LEA 6003 IS missing. lea district name 49-01-000 Caddo Hills School District 49-02000 Mount Ida School District 49-04-000 Oden Schoel District 50-04-000 Emmet School Oisltid 50-06-000 Prescott School Disbict 50-08-000 Nevada 5chool Oisttict 51-01-000 Deer School District 51-02-000 Jasper SchOODI istrict 51-03-000 Mount Judea School District 51-04--000 western Grove School District 52-01-000 Bearden School District 52-04-000 camden FairViewS choolD ist 52-05-000 Harmony Grove Sdiool District 52--06-000 Stephens Schoof Dfstriet 53-01-000 East End School District 53-02-000 Perry-casa School District 53-03-000 Perryville School District 54-01-000 Barton-LexaS choofD istrict 54-02-000 Elaine School District 54-03-000 Helena/W .HelenaS choolD ist 54-04-000 Marvell School District 54-05-000 Lake VteN School District 55-01-000 Delight School District 55-02-000 CenterpoinSt choolD istrict 55-03-000 Kirby School District 55-04-000 MurtreesboroS chooDl istrict 56-02-000 HarrisburgS chooDl istrict 56--04-000 Marked Tree Schoof District 56-05-000 TrumannS chooDl istrict 56-07-000 weiner School District 56-08-000 East PoinsetCt o. SchoolD ist 57-01-000 Acom School District 57-02-000 Hatfield School District 57-03-000 Mena SchoODI istrict 57-04-000 Van CoveS enooDl istrict 57-05-000 Wickes School DISV'ict 58-01-000 All\u0026lt;lns School District 58-02-000 Dover School District 58-03..000 Hector Schoof District 58-04-000 PottsvttleS ChooDl istrict 58-05-000 RussellvilleS chooDl istrict 59-01-000 Des Arc School Dlsllict 59-02-000 oevans BluffS chooDl istrict 58-03-000 Hazen School Oisiric\nt 60-01-000 Little Rode School District 80-02-000 N. Little Rock School District 60-03-000 Pulaski CC. Spee. School Dist 61-01-000 Siggers-ReynSo chooDl istrict A1..n?.llM M211n\"'rri ~nnl ~ 2.337'-. 7g 8'13'f.3b /g41/,,.'IS Post-I~ Fax Note 7671 To Co. Phone# Fax  0/ ct\u0026gt; magnet adm. adm --\"-. 623. 12 560.32 246.22 304.74 1089.41 558.56 288.15 598.76 254 285.98 n9.G9 3514.22 848.03 419.G 700.64 165 95B.66 747.76 487.73 3764.74 725.17 198.07 372.68 919.3 408.9B 533.61 1042.62 806.82 1717.09 434.59 828.09 460.94 334.95 1867.16 445.81 558.4 1184.39 1366.7 780.09 979.41 5340.52 680.25 450.57 440.51 21008.71 8233.32 114'11.oo 239.22 2368.07 501.04 979.95 mtoms mtoms sent rec'd ---rJ'-ta---- ~'i.73...i /07/. ::: L(,l~.,/ 110 I JAN-06-0T0H U02 :54P M PULASCKOSI CHOOLS FAXN O4. 900483 P. 01 PuL_ASKI CouNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 925 E.Asr Dc\u0026lt;oN ROAD Lmu: ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 (501) 490-2000 Date: /_ h-o o Time: To: From: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): _____ _ POST OmcE Box 8601 LITTLE Roe:,, ARI\u0026lt;AN'SAS 72216 FAX (501.) 490-0483 QOM N = a.: c=o \u0026lt;:r == =\u0026lt;: r ci :z: :x: \u0026lt;I: LL. en _J == \u0026lt;=..: \u0026gt; en C) \u0026lt;..:\u0026gt; :s.e: ~ _J :::::\u0026gt; a.. :c P- \"\"3\" L.() N = :::::\u0026gt; !=-- == I co =I :z .\u0026lt;I,: Pulaski Co. Special OisL--ict Liwnber 10-22-99 Quarter Endiog Date 12-2::i-99 Dale Submitied 1st Quaner Number 94.aAd ~ Si gr.a'i!:lofS uperinier.cicn:\"\"' FAPD-38 _.....,1'\"'\"9-'-'99\"--=-2COO\"\"~:..=.....--YSECAHRO OL M to M TRAl'iSFERS TELEPHONE NUMBER (50.t) 590-2000 SUPRINTENDEl\\\"l\"S QUARTERLY ATIENDAJiCE REPORT, GRADES K -12 ADT  ADA  ADM -------------- This repon is riue within fifire11 ( 15) days after lhe end of each quarter (Ark. Code Ano. 6-l 8-213). Send ooe coy 10 the office of Lo~ Fiscal Ser.~ces, #4 Stale Capi1ol Mal:, Room 202-A, Lin le Rock, Arkaru!IS 7220 I and one cop)' 10 the Counly Board of Educarioo. Each quaner is to be: no Jess than forty ( 40) and no more than (50) days. 0 , , Days ADM Days Oars  Ab\u0026lt;er.t To~I Abscnl fl~urt.s tr.c ohunnt1 tnru 14 should in Tou,1 j Col. 4~.5 Tow bu~~kll~m~...._ _____ ___,__~,..L...-!--~T_,_ _ _.,_,.._...._.\"\"--..._.'-'_.7~+~N~Jc....L.--_,.._Co~1.._.i.......,__....:...___..,_,_-- '+'- -K- -'--\"---L-'-'--'-'-'-_.........,_,.,...__.. __,,,.,...u,..J.....-,'---\".'.-.\",~_- C. Resident pupits sen! 10 a.her district(5) cmcier \"M 10 M~ transf:::-s Lisi Qi$Uklls\\ l.l'Ali - D. Tolal Cofcolumns 12, 13, lo!. These will be used for St.ale Eqtu!ization Aid purposes E. Nor,-Residcnl pupils received from other diitrict(s) under \"M 10 11,r tranSfcrs. 1\n,. i)j51,i:,1, !FA.~ \\ DCCn 7001 45 ~SI) 200\" /,, ~.I~ lalf.: 0 3 596 n ffll\u0026gt; 0 3,704 I I I I I I I i I I I I 3 5% 15:, 111 1t\n0 42. 937 42 937 _irn: ll ~~ 0 6 270 6 270 Jt704 166 86.0 0 4':i,207 49.207 H. ?'\u0026lt;umbero fkinderg.rten pupils enrolled chisq ua:1er: Full-Time __ 8__6_\nHalf-Time ____ Ad\u0026lt;lilional instruc1ion.\no n back I 'I - 1.529 988.13 0 1934.C6 1071.48 328 146.62 0 14:!..T'l ~Q ,,,, 1,857 1134.75 0 1175.00 ~,:\"~\" FIN-09..()0--005 5191 11/11/1999 11:42 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO STUDENT REGISTRATION OFFICE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN ST. LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 PHONE: 324-2272 FAX: 324-2281 FAX COVER SHEET To:  ~, ~ S C\\ G W-L cl.e__/1.1 Fax Number._, _ ~_7__l- -_1c_I_ G_ _(. ) _ From: __ \\)_e_c_v_1.._,'-_C_~------ I~, \\ ') # Pages Including Cover Sheet: __ _ Re: ,_.-f\\oj_ --:\\Zt'\\{ \" ---------------------------- cc: ______________________ _ 11/11/1999 11:42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 02 ------------ STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBERlENROLLMENTREPORT 001 - ~ENTRAL GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM lF TOTAL 09 100 103 156 143 l 0 g 5 0 0 511 10 10-1 96 152 160 0 0 0 0 518 11 114 128 112 \"'172 3 s 0 0 536 12 93 rn 10s 99~173 l If) I 0 0 0 47-1 ~17 TOTALFOR:CENlltAL 411~ 32 519 648 SI{) 4 15 1t 0 0 2045 ooz-HALL GRADE WM WF .BM BF HM HF AM AF  IF TOTAL 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 09 39 41 181 154 9 ll 3 0 0 439 10 45 45 152 134 g 7 6 0 0 398 II 3? 38 Ill 96 12 7 g 5 0 0 315 12 26 ~34 64%' 87 8 ')..._ 7 4 7 0 0 237 U7~159 so9'-4n \u0026lt;.) 117- TOTAL FOR: HALL 37 '- 32 19 \\6 0 0 1391 003 - MANN MIS GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 60 58 63 78 -I 5 0 0 270 07 53 80 82 66 2 3 2 j 0 0 291 08 54,,g 15 61 ~ 85 0 ?\\_ 0 2 4 0 0 281 TOT~L FOil: t\\1.~\"'N MIS 167 fY2\\1 3\n?06)-::229 3 ~ 4 8 l2 0 0 80 5-\n\u0026gt;,?~ 005 - P ARKVIEW GRADE WM WF BM BF HM Hf AM M L\"\\1 IF TOTAL 09 68 67 61 SJ 3 3 3 0 0 287 JO 58 82 68 76 2 5 0 0 293 11 49 85 66 83 0 I 3 0 0 295 Oo 12 42/l) 87 65~~ 82 3 l'l)~o 2 0 0 282 TOTAL FOR: PAIU(V}EW 21,lf) 321 uo 322 6 5 8 18 0 0 1157 507 006-BOOKER GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 12 30 23 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 88 02 19 26 20 24 0 0 0 0 0 90 03 16 24 17 31 2 0 0 () 92 0-1 18 23 21 26 0 0 0 91 OS 20~25 20 \"'- 2S 0 i' 0 2 0 0 0 95 (' K 161) 20 21119 0 \"- 0 0 0 78 TOT/.L fOR: BOOKER 101 148 122 14~ 2 6 4 l 0 0 S34 ~17 Monday, November 08, 1999 Page 1 of 12 11/11/1999 11: 42 51:!1-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 03 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 007-DUNBAR GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 43 31 7S 78 0 7 s 0 0 240 07 S0~36 71 ~66 7 3 4 2 0 0 239 08 43146 86~ 7] ].~5 3 4 0 0 260 TOTALFOR:DUNBA1R3 6 113 232 215 9 9 14 11 0 0 139 (po?~ 008-FAIR GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 25 31 IOI 102 3 2 0 0 0 0 264 10 35 18 ]18 92 5 0 0 0 :270 I\\ 23'-.19 88 ~]00 1 0 0 0 233 \\'\\. 12 ]5 '\\. 12 90 ~ 69 1 \\'J\\.. o 0 0 0 0 187 TOTALF OR: FAIR 99 80 397 3'3 6 8 0 :l 0 0 955 f5o7 009 - FORST HT GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 42 42 79 77 3 3 0 0 248 07 43~38 87 85 0 2 0 0 257 86 ij 93 i 08 50 'f 39 2 'l 4 4 2 0 0 280 TOTAL FOR: FORST HT 135 11, lSl 255 5 6 9 4 0 0 785 (,57- 010-PUL HTJ GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 62 6] 70 65 0 3 0 0 0 262 07 48 ~ 51 ?7 74 0 0 2 0 0 253 08 33 ~ 40 96~ 75 o ~o 0 0 0 245 TOTAL FOP.: Pl.IL HT J 143 152 243 214 1 0 s l 0 0 760 ~o7 011  SOUTHWST GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 4 8 74 62 2 0 0 0 0 0 \\SO 07 10 !,Tl 8 81 \\J..77 0 3 0 0 0 0 179 Q 08 l \"i2 57 f 55 0 1\\)3 0 0 0 0 ll8 TOTAL FOP.: SOUTHWST 15 18 212 194 2 6 0 0 0 0 447 91h 012  MCCLELLA GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 09 14 9 159 149 0 0 0 0 0 332 10 )2 21 170 175 3 3 0 0 0 0 384 ll 50() 13 98 ~~ 25 4 4 0 0 0 0 249 () 12 14 \"- 20 86 104 0 ~2 0 0 0 227 TOTAL FOR: MCCLELL.\\ 45 63 SH SS3 8 9 1 0 0 0 1192 ~\n? Monday, November 08, 1999 Pag 2 of 12 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 04 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT op -HENDERSN GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 15 11 91 62 0 3 0 0 0 183 01 25 29 71 d 57 4 3 2 0 0 192 08 14 \\) 16 67 C\"f7i 4 I~ 2 1 l 0 0 176 TOTALF OR: HENDIRSN 54 ~ 56 229~ 193 5 '\\ 6 s 3 0 0 SSl 711 015 - CLOVR JR GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 6 9 116 llO 2 0 0 0 0 251 07 II 10 112 ~ 93 8 7 0 0 0 0 241 9~ 4 08 98 '- 88 , 9\\, 6 0 0 0 213 TOT,'L FOR: CLOVR .JR 26 23 326 \\)l9l l3 ts 0 0 0 705 ii7- 016 - MABEL JR GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 06 25 27 S9 57 3 0 0 0 0 172 07 21 19 71 Q_ 50 2 0 0 0 165 08 18~ 13 58'.\\} 65 0 :--,._2 0 0 0 157 TOTAL FOR: MABEL JR 64 \"! 59 188~172 3' 6 2 0 0 0 494 rr~7 017 -BALE GAADE WM WF BM BF HM HF Ai'\\1 AF IM IF TOTAL 01 5 ll 17 20 4 0 0 0 S9 02 3 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 03 3 4 14 20 3 0 0 0 0 45 04 5 5 16 14 0 0 0 0 0 41 OS 0 3 18 22 0 0 0 0 0 44 K 4 6 14 '- 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 47 p 5 \\\\)} .. 7 7~ 14 o ~o 1 0 0 0 34 TOTALF OR:B ALE 25 41 103 \u0026lt;y12 8 7 4 3 0 0 312 ~7~ 018-~RAD:X GRADE WM WF BM BF HM ID' AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 3 II 22 20 3 0 0 0 61 02 4 25 19 0 0 0 0 0 so 03 8 3 21 16 2 0 0 0 0 51 04 10 25 16 2 0 3 0 0 58 05 6 4 18 11 3 0 0 0 so K 7 ~10 23 {16 o \\JU 0 3 0 0 60 t\\: p 5 2 5 4 0 10 0 0 18 TOTAL. FOR: BRADY 40 35 139 108 s 10 4 7 0 0 348 111 Monday, November 08, 1999 Pag_c 3 ofl2 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 05 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 019 - BADGETT GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL OJ 0 12 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0,2 2 19 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 03 i IS 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 04 0 0 10 17 0 0 0 0 0 28 05 2 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 K 0 4 17 ~19 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 2 \\.9.0_ I\\ p 5 '\\. 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 TOTALFOR:BADG'ETT 7 9 86 93 0 0 0 0 0 196 e,J'/r:, 020 - MCDERMOT GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 II 14 15 20 0 2 0 0 64 02 13 9 19 26 3 0 0 0 0 71 03 12 7 25 13 4 0 0 0 63 04 7 6 21 21 3 0 0 0 60 05 1\\_1s )7 ~ 15 0 0 0 0 56 \\J. K 14~)9 IOi II 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 59 t\n\u0026gt;'1 i, TOHL FOR: ~JCD.ERMOT 64 70 107 106 9 10 3 4 0 0 373 021-CARVER GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL OJ 27 10 24 23 0 2 0 0 88 02 23 )4 17 28 0 0 2 2 0 0 86 03 24 14 22 24 0 0 0 0 86 04 24 20 20 30 0 0 2 3 0 0 99 05 u0\\.23 28 ~18 o ~o 0 0 0 gg K 20~ 12 20~\"20 2 10 3 0 0 78 TOTALF OR:C ARVER 136 93 131 143 3 0 8 11 0 0 525 /\n5-\nJ7. ~ 022 - BASE~INE GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 6 0 26 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0:2 3 6 14 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 03 :2 J 17 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 04 3 3 20 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4] 05 0 5 IS 15 0 0 0 0 0 36 K 3 5 .21 ~20 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 p 2 ~ 0 17')-14 0 i 0 0 0 0 34 TOTALF OR: BASELINE 19 22 13-0 J2l 0 0 0 0 296 \u0026lt;?-$1 Monday, November 08, 1999 Page 4 of 12 - -------- 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 05 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBERlENROLLMENTREPORT 023-FAIRPRK GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 2 3 II 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 02 3 6 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 32 03 3 7 II 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 04 3 3 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 05 2 3 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 K 4% S 17 013 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 p 7 VJ 7 7 ~12 0 ~ 0 0 0 35 TOTAL roR: FAIR PRK .24 34 7S 85 0 0 t 2 0 0 lll --\n~?- 024  FORST PK GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 14 19 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0.2 14 10 IS 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 47 03 15 14 11 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 04 14 16 15 18 0 0 0 0 65 OS 14 a 20 10 ' 7 0 \\\\ 0 3 0 0 0 54 K 11~11 17 ~11 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 32 90 78 61 0 0 4 3 0 0 3l8 .,. .p -7J - 025  FRANKLIN GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 0 2 31 32 0 0 0 2 0 0 67 02 0 35 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 03 0 2 29 32 0 0 0 2 0 0 65 ().l 0 .J3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 05 0 0 34 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 K I 2 41~6 0 2 0 0 0 0 72 p 1 ' I 33} 34 0 2 0 0 0 0 71 TOTAL FOR: F'RAi\"'KLlN 4 7 246 220 0 4 0 4 0 0 485 9l7, 026. GARLAND GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 0 0 14 19 2 0 0 0 37 02 0 0 ll 24 0 0 0 0 0 46 03 0 :21 15 0 0 0 0 39 04 0 0 17 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 05 0 19 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 38 K 0 l'f} 0 27 ~ 18 1 J\\l 0 0 0 0 47 p 0 l 10 rr 5 l \"\\. I 0 0 0 0 18 TOTALfOR:GAIU.ANO 1 2 129 Ill 9 4 0 0 0 267 ~7- Monday, November 08, 1999 Page 5 of 12 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 07 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 027- GIBBS GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 10 10 17 9 0 0 0 0 0 47 02 9 ti II 11 0 0 0 0 0 43 03 16 6 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 4S 04 12 10 II l\\_1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 41 05 16 t\\..6 I ~ 2 0 0 0 0 49 8113 14}. 10 K 18 12 l '\\. I 0 0 0 s.: TOTAL fOll: ClBBS 71 56 80 67 l s 3 0 0 285 ~~ 028-CHICOT GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 6 6 '.25 28 7 4 0 2 0 0 78 02 6 3 29 27 8 2 0 0 0 80 03 6 8 28 23 7 4 0 0 0 71 04 9 6 26 24 7 6 0 0 0 0 78 05 8 8 313--33 3 0 0 86 K 6\nQ7 25 }24 5 ~ 8 0 0 0 0 75 p 3 3 13 I\\) 8 .1 s 0 0 0 0 36 TOTAL FOR: CHICOT 44 41 177 167 .fl 33 3 \" 0 0 510 t,770 029  WEST HIL GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 3 7 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 46 02 4 4 19 13 0 0 0 0 0 41 03 4 9 15 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 04 s 5 IS 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 4S 05 7 '-. 6 17 ,11 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Cl'- K 6~1 14,10 0 /\\JI 0 0 0 0 32 ron.L FOR: WEST HJL 29 32 9S 96 1 0 0 0 255 757 030 - JEFFRSN GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL OJ 21 12 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 02 22 25 12 15 0 0 0 0 76 03 14 15 10 12 0 0 0 0 53 04 19 20 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 65 05 2obc) 14 11'0-16 0 \\9..0 0 0 0 0 61 ~ K 14 '\\ 22 12 ?t::13 0 0 0 0 0 62 TOTAL FOR: Jf:FFRSN 110 108 69 77 0 3 2 0 0 370 .3\ni, Mol\\day, November 08, 1999 Page 6 or 12 11/11/1999 11:42 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 08 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBERI ENROLLMENRTE PORT 031 - CLOVR EL 032-DODD 033 - MEADCLIF 034 - MITCHELL Monday, November 08, 1999 GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOT AL 01 02 03 04 OS K p TOTAL FOR: CLOVR tL 2 2 2 0 34 29 2 27 30 0 34 21 30 35 37 19 24~28 151\\) 12 l80 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 61 70 70 60 58 GRADE WM WF BM BF H:\\-1 HF AM AF IM JF TOTAL 01 4 6 10 9 02 II 0 6 11 03 6 4 8 14 04 2 5 11 20 05 3 2 12 6 ,K 5~11 P 6 ~ 3 l\"OTAL FOR: DODD 37 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~o 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 29 33 39 23 31 18 203 ~5 7. GRADE WM WF BM BF ID1 HF AM AF IM IF TOT AL 01 02 03 04 OS K TOTAL FOR: MEADCLIF 4 8 6 6 14 16 0 0 0 0 O 0 4 1.:1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 f10 4 tf 4 32 20 20~22 12 o-\n:1._6 ....... 101 97 0 0 -----0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 34 49 43 48 GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 02 03 ()4 05 K p TOTAL FOR: MJTOIELL 0 15 18 21 14 0 0 26 17 0 23 21 0 0 24 13 0 l 12 } 18 0 VJ O 6 i 12 2 3 127 UJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 38 43 46 37 31 Page 7 of 12 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 09 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 035 ML KING GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 14 25 36 25 0 0 2 2 0 0 104 02 20 22 30 26 0 0 0 2 0 0 100 03\n25 24 25 27 2 0 0 0 0 0 103 04 13 16 19 23 0 0 0 0 0 n OS 14 18 20 19 0 0 0 0 0 72 K l6{g 17 26 '\\J.\n?5 l ff) l 2 2 0 0 90 It\u0026amp; p 14 'l 15 19fYt 16 2 11 3 0 0 71 TOTAL :FORM: L KING 116 137 175 l61 s l 6 10 0 0 612 ~~7 036  ROCKFE!.!! GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL -:p ,_ 'P\nj ,\n)- J(p ~o w ~ '4! -tp #'o/ 01 6 18 14 21 0 0 0 0 0 59 02 ll 9 19 )9 0 0 0 0 0 59 ~ \\' I~ l~ij 03 14 7 13 19 0 0 0 0 0 54 I I l ,_r- 04 5 8 19 21 0 0 0 0 ss 05 II~ 9 2() 12 0}. 0 0 0 0 0 52 K II 11 20{ 23 0 0 0 0 67 \"' ,P 1:5~!3 12~5!3 2 .\n).. 0 0 0 0 o ~57-ss f TOTAL:FOR:ROCKF~LR 73 7S 117 128 3 2 2 0 0 -4o:l- {J7 0 -1-' 6 037 - GEYER SP GRADE WM Wf BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 7 5 14 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 51 02 3 3 23 12 0 0 0 0 0 42 03 3 25 17 2 0 0 0 0 49 04 2 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 05 3 6 18 21 0 0 0 0 0 49 K 4 -y 2 24 l'.2.2 l 0 0 0 0 0 53 p 2 -Y 2 is'-\" 13 1~2 0 0 0 0 35 TOTALFOR:GtITRSP H 20 1391US 10 3 0 0 0 0 32, Sd)o 038-PULHTE GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 JS 9 12 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 47 02 8 ll 12 0 0 0 0 0 40 03 8 12 22 19 0 0 0 0 0 62 04 15 8 JS ~17 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 05 16 r6 9 18 18 0 \\J-2 0 0 0 0 63 K 6 \"'10 7 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 TOTAL FOR: PULJIT  68 S9 82 n 0 4 1 l 0 0 J(M 77 Monday, November 08, 1999 Page 8 or 12 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 10 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 032 - RIGHT~EL GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 0 0 17 23 0 0 0 0 0 41 02 0 0 14 lS 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 03 0 21 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 04 0 0 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 OS 0 0 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 I\u0026lt;. 0 '-' I IS ~:zJ 110 0 0 0 0 40 f' 3 I 1s l 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 TOTAL FOR: RJGHTSEL  2 118 143 0 0 0 0 269 97?~ 040-ROMINE GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF Al'\\11 AF IM lF TOTAL 01 7 12 24 2 3 0 0 0 0 49 02 7 2 20 13 s 3 0 0 0 51 03 5 3 19 10 3 0 0 0 42 04 6 4 14 lO 2 2 0 0 0 39 OS 7 19 11 s 2 0 0 0 0 47 K 7 ~ 7 23 ~17 l Uo4 0 0 0 60 p 10 K 4 11 f\\ 8 0 ~ l 0 0 0 0 34 ~((, TOTAL FOR: ROMINE 49 24 118 93 16 18 4 0 0 0 :m 042-WASHNGT'.'i GRADE W)t WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 11 9 25 23 6 4 2 2 0 0 82 02 10 7 29 24 5 4 3 0 0 0 82 OJ 19 8 2S 25 2 4 2 0 0 86 04 l5 9 32 27 2 3 2 0 0 0 90 05 12 ~ 9 19 127 3 0 0 77 K 8 ~ 8 27 ~21 I ~2 4 0 0 T}. p 10 '-. 8 161\\'i 12 3 \\) 0 3 l 0 0 54 TOTAL FOR: WASHNGTN 85 58 173 159 24 18 16 10 0 0 543 c, I ?o 043 - WILLUMS GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 10 20 20 14 0 0 0 0 66 02 io 15 14 18 0 0 0 0 0 68 03 12 :20 18 28 0 0 0 0 90 04 20'22 26 ffl24 0 0 2 0 0 95 OS 24 ~ 12 24 It\\ 19 0 \\}.I 2 0 0 83 K t3 11 9119 0 \"0 0 4 0 0 56 TOTAL FOR: WILLIAMS 109 JOO Ill J\n!2 l 5 9 0 0 458 ~ 1? Mond\nay, November 08, 1999 Page 9 of l2 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 11 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 044-WILSON GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL OJ 3 22 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 02 0 2 26 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 49 03 2 2 27 14 0 0 0 0 0 46 ().1 4 0 18 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 05 2 2 17'b27 0 0 0 0 0 49 K 2 ~ 2 351\"'-\n17 le\\ l 0 0 0 59 p /12 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 18 ~, ?e TOTAL FOR: WILSON l4 13 154 114 s 2 0 0 0 313 045 - WOODRUFF GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 0 4 13 22 0 0 0 0 0 40 02 17 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 03 3 6 14 17 0 0 0 0 0 41 04 3 4 17 IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 OS 4 2 20 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 K 3)-__2 l/) IS~ lO 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 p 6 fq i 121) 8 0 \"10 0 0 0 3d TOTAL FOR: WOODRUFF 24 JO 108 117 0 0 0 282 80,. 046 - MABEL EL GRADE WM WF BM BF HM RF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 7 2 25 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 02 s 10 20 16 0 0 0 0 0 52 03 12 8 31 :20 2 0 0 0 0 0 73 ()4 10 26 27 0 0 0 0 0 69 05 7 6 2222 0 0 0 0 0 58 K 6~ 8 20 f' 18 o V)o 0 0 0 0 52 p 4 5 5 'ff 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 , TOTAL FOR:: 'tfABILE L Sl 44 149 129 s 0 0 0 0 0 378 ?It 047-TERRY GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 15 22 21 23 0 0 4 0 0 86 02 19 16 23 22 2 2 3 0 0 88 03 )4 21 16 23 2 0 2 2 0 0 80 04 21~22 17 \u0026lt;.\\1, 6 0 2 2 4 0 0 84 OS 24~15 21 ~22 I '-o 3 2 0 0 88 K 21 28 19 1, 1, 3 I 0 0 89 TOTAL FOR, TERRY 114 124 117 1.21 6 6 14 J3 0 0 515 ~/,? Monday, N'ovmber 08, 1999 Page l0ofl2 11/11/1999 11: 42 501-324-2281 L R S D SRO PAGE 12 ... STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT 048 - FULBRIGH GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 IS 17 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 58 02 13 18 17 14 0 0 0 65 03 16 31 )5 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 04 11!.\\)24 21 9 0 0 0 0 0 72 05 22i22 16~16 o o 0 0 0 77 K 24 14 18 '\\ 4 0 0 0 0 62 TOTAL FOR: FULBRICH 107 116 99 70 1 :2 4 0 0 410 \"117- 050 - OTTER CR GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF L'\\1 IF TOTAL 01 17 17 14 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 02 9 18 16 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 03 JS 13 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 -l9 04 13 17 10\\_13 0 2 0 0 0 0 55 05 Jl~lS 13 11 l (\\_ 0 0 0 0 0 51 K 14 ~ 19 18 ~20 l J 0 0 0 7-l TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 19 99 84 80 3 3 0 0 0 349 -'/71 05! -W AKEflEL GRADE W)f WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL Ot 3 2 26 29 0 4 0 0 0 0 ~ 02 0 2 24 23 4 0 0 0 0 54 03 4 4 25 23 3 0 0 0 0 60 ()4 0 1 .21114 2 2 0 0 0 41 OS 3~ 3 23~25 0 i\\l 0 0 0 56 K /~ .2 231.26 ) 1 3 0 0 0 0 59 TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 14 14 142 140 8 14 2 0 0 0 334 1'/. 052-WATSON GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF Al'\\11 AF IM IF TOTAL 01 41 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 02 4 26 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 03 0 0 32 38 0 0 0 0 72 04 27 32 0 0 0 0 0 62 05 0 3 30 26 0 0 0 0 61 l\u0026lt;. l~l 35 ~37 0 \\j. 0 0 0 0 0 74 p 2 3 13~17 0 1 0 0 0 0 36 TOTALF OR:W ATSON 9 10 204 216  3 3 0 0 0 0 4-45 q~/le, Monday, November 08, 1999 Page II ofl2 .:., .... 11/11/1999 11:42 712-EVE HS 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1 ENROLLMENT REPORT GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM 10 11 l2 TOT Al. FOR: EVE HS 0 0 6 6 12~18 2 i'-0 20 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PAGE 13 IF TOTAL 0 0 0 0 13 41 ss 7l l, 725 -ALT AGCY GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 01 02 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OS 5 2 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 4 4 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8 4 12 K 9 4 5 4 06c, 2 0 \\fj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 3 6 7 2\\ 22 27 16 4 AL FOR: ALT AGCY 37 21 0 0 o ....,__a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 766-ALC 767-ACC LP GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF TOTAL 07 08 0 09 0 2 11 6 JO ll 12 TOTAL FOR: ALC 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 Ilk 4 OJlf I I 0 37 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 '() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 63 GRADE WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF N IF TOT AL 0 0 4 0 10 6 TOTAL FOR: ACC LP 27 17 GRAND TOTAL: 3S19 3635 0 3 3 24!\\:,25 1sij 21 26 37 72 86 0 0 0 0 I 0 O fr) I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8596 8501 30, 277 180 173 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 61 53 so 205  '7.\u0026gt; 0 25190 Moodiy, November 08, 1999 ~ K -59 ~ Q \\\\.' Page 12 of 12 IC:.,. -f-_:3. -11/ -I ~1-i 7117 ~,II 7o:~~ ivrMv : ~i -\\t)~ @ ~tke\\f-11er 311 _ 0100 RECEIVED NOVO 3 1999 ROCKl!FeLLER SCHOOL .. STUDENTC OUNTB Y RACE ~ r1,1999 ~ (_, (., ~~ GRADE 81.ACIC WHITE OTHER TOTAL P1 5 3 2 10 P2 10 7 1 18 6 3 16 24 4 6 2 3 54 56 23 .., OfHCE(l DESEGftEQID.\\t1ffO1 0Rn1IG Ll v..u~.. 'l \\r,.\\\nW A, \"I iMAYl .\\J,\\_{ti  ~15 11/29/1999 09:39 SCHOOL Central Fair Hall McC/ollan Parle.view- Total H.S. Cloveraa1e Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabefvafe Mann Pulaski Heights Souttrwest Total MIDDLE Badgett Bale Baseline Booker' Brady carver' Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Parx Franklin Fulbnght Garland Gaver Springs Gibbs Jefferson King Mabe/vale McDermott MeadowcJiff Mitchell Otter Creel( Pulaski Heights Rightsel/ Rockefeller Romine Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff Total ELEM. TOTAL 501-324-2281 OPER. CAP. 2200 1200 1300 1440 1200 7340 750 780 780 960 600 900 750 750 6270 239 383 338 645 409 556 509 489 271 282 400 532 478 276 358 321 453 715 443 453 302 258 397 375 296 481 403 548 416 678 534 302 490 340 296 144158 28278 L R S O SRO LRSO Capacities PAGE 02 --------- -- --- ------------------------- - LR SD SRO PAGE EH ---STUDENT REGISTRATION OFFICE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT S01 SHERMAN ST. l.rTTU: ROCK AR 72202 PHONE: 324-2272 FAX: 324-2281 FAX COVER SHEET To:f~ Fax Number. 37 J - 0 I oO From: [) P Q.,.V'\\..ul Date: I \\ -~9' ~ C, 9 # Pages Including Cover Sheet: ,\n:\nL ., General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . General h1formaUon - I j : I : : mm: D Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: -- ADKINS ELEMENT ARY (6003090) 1111 I: 11111 f.-.-.........,..X....,.,.........! IGradJ African Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Nati~e Native White White American American Male Female Male Female American American Male Female ITotail Male Female Male Female ~II 10 II 12 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~181 IIJD ~II 7 II 8 llIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 IIIII 6 II~ ~II 9 I 7 IIIII 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 IIIII 11 [ill 01 8 7 IIIII 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 IIIJI 10 II 34 I 05 8 7 IIIII 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 l[I[:115 II~ K 12 9 11~101 II 0 1 II 0 0 11=:D12 I l@J Bl 01 3 7 IIIII 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 0 11~131 IIJIJ jTotal II 57 57 [IJI 0 II 0 II 2 II 0 0 ![][JI 55 IClliJ - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=l999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003090\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 .. . General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: ARNOLD DRIVE ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003137) 11111 I .. -~ i\n. : IGradel African Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American Male Female American American ITotall Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 8 II 6 IITII 1 II 2 1 II 0 0 ll]DI 20 II 69 I ~II 5 II 14 [}JI 0 II 1 1 II 0 0 11~1 19 II~ ~II 6 II 7 IITII 1 II 0 1 0 0 11~1 19 [~] ~II 4 II 8 1o=:10 1 II 2 1 0 1 11~11 6 II~ ~II 8 II 8 1o=:J01 II 0 I 0 0 II 0 101 13 II~ ~II 6 II 3 IITJI 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 III] 12 ICEJ ~II 8 II 6 IITII 1 II 3 II 2 0 II 1 ll]DI 18 II~ \\Total \\I 45 II 52 [TI\\ 3 II 8 II 6 0 II 2 l~I 117 ii 3z2I - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 3 7 \u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 . General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: BAKER INTERDISTRICT ELEM SCHOOL (6003092) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White American American American American [Total[ Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 01 3 I 3 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 IIEJI 18 II~ ~II 0 3 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 23 II 52 I ....... ..........X..\u0026gt;\u0026gt;:-:........\u0026lt; ~II 7 3 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 13 II~ ~II 2 7 [DI 0 0 0 II 0 0 11~1 16 II~ ~II 3 4 IITII 0 I 0 0 II 0 0 11~1 23 II~ ~II 8 5 IITII 1 II 0 0 II 0 0 11~1 24 IIEJ ~II 2 3 IITJI 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 11~1 12 II~ jTota!2I5I 28 IITJI 1 II 0 0 II 0 0 IDilll 129 II3 27 I - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;distname=6003 \u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003092\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 , ' General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . General lnforrnation  \" t: I i : II\n' Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: BATES ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003146) IGrade African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White r0I American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 01 17 11 13 1o:=10 1 0 II 0 0 0 11~11 0 II~ ~II 11 19 IITII 0 0 II 0 0 0 [JTII 10 II~ r--.......-\u0026gt;.....-..............., 111/11 Ld iEE  ~I 18 14 IITJI 0 0 II 0 0 0 [JIJI 19 ll}D 01 24 20 101 0 0 II 0 0 0 l@JI 8 [ill ~II 10 17 IITII 0 0 II 0 0 0 11~1 9 II}!] ~II 10 12 IITII 0 0 II 0 ii 0 0 11=:IJ6 I II~ ~JI 0 I 1 IITJ 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11=:IJ0 I IIJJ ~JI 13 II 15 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 9 II~ !Total II 103 II 111 [TII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 ICKll 71 II3 77 I TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr. cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 46\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: BAYOU METO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003094) 1111 ,..... : 11111 i .\nc-:-:.---.....\u0026gt;.-....-.-. Blill !Gradel African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American ITotall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 0 II 1 IITII 0 0 II 0 I 0 0 ll]DI 38 II~ ~II 1 0 IITII 0 1 II 0 0 3 lr~I 48 I~ ~II 2 0 IITJI 0 1 II 0 0 0 ll]DI 32 II~ ~JI 1 2 101 0 1 II 2 0 0 11~1 51 [ill ~II 1 I 2 IIIII 0 0 II 0 0 0 11~1 46 I~ ~II 1 II 0 101 0 2 II 0 0 0 II_}~] 22 ll}u ~II 0 II 1 II.Ill 0 0 II 0 I 0 I 0 l@JI 45 II~ lrotalll 6 II 6 []JI 0 5 II 2 II 0 II 3 IIw s 11282 1s110 I - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr. cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003094\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . General lnforroaUon  = :r ,n n r: Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: CATO ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003129) ,1.. .. ml 1111 r--..-.--....----- Bt'lll fiiiliiiiiir=,=: IGradel African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White American American American American ITotall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~] 7 II 7 1o=101 II 0 1 II 0 II 1 11~12 4 II~ ~II 12 II 11 1~11 0 II 1 2 II 0 I 0 lf~I 18 II~ ~II 6 II 8 [Ill 0 1 0 II 0 0 11~1 26 II~ ~II 6 II 10 1o=101 0 0 II 0 0 ll~I 17 II~ ~II 14 II 12 1o=10 1 0 0 II 0 0 11~12 3 II~ [Q[II 8 II 11 1o=111 1 0 II 0 0 11~12 6 IIEJ ~II 5 II 7 ICD 0 1 1 II 1 1 11~1 22 II~ IT otal II 58 II 66 IOJI 1 II 4 4 II 1 II 2 l[JK]I15 6 114641 - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003129\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . . GerH:lrai Information  : rn : t rn Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: CLINTON ELEM MAGNET SCHOOL (6003095) B African Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Nati_ve Native White White American American Male Female Male Female American American Male Female rotall Male Female Male Female ~II 25 I 29 IITJI 0 2 II 1 II 0 II 0 [fill 22 111021 ~II 19 24 IITII 0 1 1 I 0 II 0 11~1 21 II~ rXXX\u0026gt;..................! 61{111 !ij ~II 22 28 IITJ 0 0 0 0 II 0 11~1 17 ll~ ~II 31 27 1o:=10 1 3 0 0 II 0 11~11 6 11103 I ~II 22 26 IITII 2 I 3 0 0 II 0 11~1 14 1r~ ~I 16 17 IITII 1 II 1 1 0 II 0 11~1 13 [ill ~II 27 21 IITJ 1 II 3 1 0 II 0 11~1 25 ll~ ~II 22 14 [Ill 0 II 1 1 0 II 0 IIJIJI 18 II~ I Total II 184 186 [TII 4 II 14 5 0 II 0 IDIDI14 6 ![ill] - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003095 \u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . Ge..n e..r a. l lnforrnation  . .. @/\\lf 111l1f (\\ tf t\\lililIfI IIlI:1\\I\\lilt\\fI t\\Ilf IJilil\\lf IJ\\II!/tJililf IJI(Jli\\I/Jl[Jil\\!/i\\I/IiIJI\\It\\lIJI/I tt Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: COLLEGE STATION ELEM SCHOOL (6003135) IGra1 African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic A Nati~e ANati~ IWMI White American American Male Female Male Female mencan mencan Male FemaleI TotaI Male Female Male Female ~II 9 4 IITII 0 II 0 I[ 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 1 II~ ~II 8 5 1~110 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 11=:D1 I lfJD ~II 12 12 1o=101 II 0 1 0 II 0 11~18 11] ~II 8 8 [~JI 0 II 0 1 0 0 11~1 18 II~ ~ll 11 II 16 IITII 1 II 1 0 0 0 11~1 19 II~ ~II 13 II 11 IITJI 1 II 1 0 I 0 1 11~1 16 II~ IT] 9 II 6 IITII 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 11=811 IIJTI !Tota! II 70 II 62 [TII 2 II 2 2 II 0 1 10[]16 4 II2 63 I TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=600313 5\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data lilll .. i . : t\u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt;..,,...-........-..-......., Rt'II le Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: CRYSTAL HILL ELEM MAGNET (6003093) !Gradel African Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic American American Male Female Male Male Female ~.11 24 II 27 ICT]I 0 1 ~II 26 II 24 ICIII 0 1 @=II 23 II 28 [}]\\ 0 0 ~II 33 22 ICIII 0 2 ~II 31 19 ICIII 0 1 ~II 25 24 ICIII 0 0 01 27 24 IITII 0 II 0 01 12 16 IITII 0 II 0 lrotall2\\0 1 184 IO\"JI 0 II 5 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten Page 1 of 2 Hispanic Native Nati~ IWhitel White B Female American American Male Female Total Male Female II 0 II 0 II 0 ll}I]I 21 \\\\ 104 \\ II 0 II 0 II 0 ll}IJ\\ 24 \\\\ms\\ II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 20 II~ II 0 II 1 II 0 11~1 27 II~ II 0 II 0 II 0 IIEJI 30 I\\ 105 \\ II 0 II 0 II 0 IIEJI 33 ll~ II 1 II 0 II 0 ll]D\\ 24 l12ill II 0 II 0 II 0 ll=rJI 18 ll}D II 1 II 1 II 0 12120 II 197 \\Ia o9 I .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=l999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003093\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Inf onnation - Enrollment Data Page 1 of2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: DUPREE ELEM SCHOOL (6003099) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American ITotall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 11 II 9 IIIII 1 0 II 3 II 1 II 0 IIJIJI 22 II~ ~II 16 II 11 ll~J 3 0 II 0 0 II 0 IIJDI 23 IIEJ ~II 9 II 6 IIIII 0 0 0 0 I 0 11~1 27 ll}D [~~]I 15 II 6 IIIJ 1 0 0 0 0 11~1 20 II~ ~II 10 II 9 IIIII 0 0 0 1 0 11~1 15 [ill 01 6 II 10 llill 0 1 1 I 0 0 11:JI1J7 I II~ jTota!6I7I II 51 IC::015 1 II 4 II 2 0 10]_[1]214 II3 01 I TERMS: -  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=l999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003099\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_fonnat=html\u0026amp;s 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: FULLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003100) f\"X....................\u0026gt; 1:11 ! ii( 1111 Ill IGra, African Afri~an Asian Asian American American Male Female Male Female ~II 11 II 13 IITII 0 ~II 12 II 9 IITII 0 ~II 20 I 14 IITII 0 ~II 17 18 IITII 0 ~JI 14 14 IITII 0 ~II 15 7 IIT:1I 0 [~]I 21 19 IITII 0 ~JI 10 I 14 [~JI 0 !Total II 120 II 108 ICDI 0 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten Hispanic Male II 0 II 1 II 0 I 0 0 II 0 II 0 II 1 II 2 I Page I of 2 Hispanic Native Native IWhlt I White Female American American Mal e Female ITotall Male Female e 0 0 II 0 11~1 12 II~ 1 0 II 0 11~1 11 II~ 1 0 II 0 III] 15 II~ 0 0 I 0 11~1 14 ll}I] 0 0 0 II: ::DJ1I0 IOTI 0 0 1 101 7 II~ 0 0 0 [illl 16 II~ 0 0 0 [1] 7 II~ 2 0 1 []QJI 92 I[]]] .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 00\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . General :Information  J:::::: II t: Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: HARRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003102) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American !Totall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 18 8 IDJI 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 11:JD6 I II~ ~I 14 11 IITll 0 II 0 II 0 I 0 0 11:=D6 I 11}8 r-X:.,:,,........,..\u0026lt; lill faiiliii --~ 03 17 8 IIT110 II 2 II 0 0 0 11::T9I I 113D 04 10 8 IDJI 0 1 II 0 0 0 11:=IJ5 I II3 3 I ~11 11 14 IDJI 0 0 1 0 0 11=:D3 I II~ ~II 7 5 IITII 0 0 0 0 0 [}JI 3 II~ 01 5 12 IITII 0 0 0 I 0 0 11~1 4 II~ !Total 11 82 66 ICIJI 0 3 1 II 0 0 IQDI 36 11230 I - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 02\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . . General Information  II I I II I I Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: JACKSONVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003103) !Gradel African Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Na\u0026lt;ive Native IWhit I White American American Male Female Male Female American American M I e Female ITotall Male Female Male Female a e ~II 23 II 32 IITII 0 II 1 II 1 II 0 II 0 11~1 18 II~ ~II 26 II 27 IITII 2 II 1 II 1 II 0 II 0 [fill 16 [ill e-..........--:-....-.,...-----.--- B!ilil ma 1: ~I 22 II 19 101 1 II 1 II 1 I 0 II 0 l~I 21 [ill 04 24 II 22 101 0 II 0 II 1 0 II 0 11:JI1J7I II~ ~II 22 II 19 IITII 0 II 0 II 1 1 II 0 11~1 18 IIEJ ~II 22 II 22 1o:=10 1 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 11~12 0 II~ !Tota! II 139 II 141 ICIJI 3 II 3 II 5 1 II 0 IOJIJHIO l[]fil TERMS: -  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 03\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: LANDMARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003104) 1111 I   i 1111 E African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American AmericanA merican ITotII Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 9 7 IITJI 0 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 10 II~ ~JI 11 18 IIT-110 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~11 7 ll}I] ~II 16 13 IITII 0 1 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 14 [ill 11:11 !ILK  iii ~II 19 12 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 17 II~ ~II 13 12 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 IIJTII 18 II~ ~II 6 15 IITII 0 0 II 0 II 0 0 11~1 19 ll}D ~II 11 10 101 0 1 II 0 II 0 0 IIJTII 8 II~ 1rota111 85 87 lo:JI 0 3 II 0 II 0 0 l~I 103 II3 86 I - TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 04\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of2 6 . General lnforrnaUon   : t :: IL l J E 1 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: LAWSON ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003105) IGradI African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White American American American American lrotall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female CI:JI3 II 2 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~11 0 1w1 I ~II 5 II 2 II I11 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 12 II~\n-,-,-.-.....::....-.. 1:11 rniirnza\u0026amp;\" ~II 4 II 2 11~101 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~11 0 [ill ~II 7 II 3 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 IIEJI 20 ll}D ~II 1 3 IIIII 1 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 IIJIJI 9 II~ ~II 6 2 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 11:JD17I II~ ~II 0 0 ILIII 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 IIIJI 3 [TI ~II 1 1 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 11:JI1J4I ll}D \\rota!I2I7 15 lo::JI i II 0 II 0 0 II 0 [ili] 95 I\\2 soI TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003105\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R2 /4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: OAK GROVE ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003108) IGrad~ African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Nati_ve Nati~e White White AmMearilcea n AFmeemriaclaen Ma le Female Male Female AmMearliec an AFmeemriaclaen Male Female ~oI ~II 2 II 10 ICIII 0 II 2 II 0 0 I 0 11~1 14 II~ ~II 4 II 5 ICIII 0 II 4 II 0 0 0 11~1 23 II~ e-........,..XX.., ~JI 9 II 7 l[rll 0 II 0 II 2 0 0 11~117 [ill ~II 5 II 7 l[rll 0 II 1 II 0 0 0 11~1 24 II~ ~II 5 II 6 l[rll 0 I 3 II 0 0 0 11~1 15 11] fif\"\"........ . .......,.,.,. . 1111 ~I 4 II 9 ICill 0 0 II 0 0 I 0 11:JT15I I II~ ~II 1 II 1 IITJI 0 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11=:D5 I II~ ~II 9 II 8 l[rll 0 3 II 2 II 0 II 1 11}!]126 II~ ~II 15 II 9 l[rll 0 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 21 II~ - !Total II 54 II 62 [IJI 0 13 II 4 II 0 II i 11142 11160 ll4 36 I TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten .. ./search_enr .cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 08\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . . General h1forrnaUon   F l I : : 1 ..........t. ........ Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: OAKBROOKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003139) B African African Asan Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American M~le Female Male Female American American ITotall Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 10 7 IITII 1 II 0 I 0 0 0 [~I 25 112!] ~II 8 10 IITII 0 II 0 0 0 0 llilll 33 11] r---....---\u0026gt;....--...---....--- 1:11 I \u0026amp;ciiiii ~II 4 9 1o:=10 1 II 0 0 0 0 11~12 2 II~ ~II 13 15 ICIJI 0 0 0 0 0 11~1 23 II~ ~II 9 7 IITII 0 0 0 I 0 0 11~1 26 II~ ~II 6 7 IITII 0 0 0 II 1 II 0 11~1 16 II~ ~II 1 0 IITII 0 0 0 II 0 II 0 11=:D0 I [TI ~II 4 10 IITII 0 0 0 II 0 II 0 llilll 19 II~ Jrotal II 55 65 IITJI '1 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 IDilll 164 114I 41 Ill TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=600313 9\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 . General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: PINE FOREST ELEMENT ARY SCHOOL (6003142) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White IToI American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 10 I 6 IIT_II 0 II 0 1 II 0 0 11~1 18 II~ ~II 4 12 IITII 0 II 1 2 II 0 0 lf~I 26 II~ ~........-....,.........--,-,-----, ~I 10 10 IITII 0 II 1 0 II 0 0 lfJDI 31 II~ ~II 14 7 IITII 1 I 0 0 II 0 0 11][]13 0 11:fil ~ll 9 4 IITII 2 1 1 0 0 11~1 22 II~ ~II 9 I 9 IITII 0 1 I 1 0 0 11~1 20 II~ ~JI 0 II 0 IITII 0 0 II 0 0 II 0 11=u1 6 II~ ~II 2 II 7 IITJI 0 0 II 0 0 II 0 11~1 25 l@J IT otal 115 8 II 55 [1]1 3 I 4 II 5 II 0 II 0 12129 II 1781 15351 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=600314 2\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 .. General Information - Enrollment Data  -e---.-.-.-........-.---:-\u0026gt;.--. -~ - Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003130) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic A Nati~e American American Male Female Male Female Male Female m\n:~an ~II 10 11 I 1 0 I 0 II 0 II 0 ~II 9 8 10]1 0 II 0 I 2 II 0 ~II 12 16 IITJI 0 II 1 0 II 0 ~I 13 11 1~11 0 II 0 0 II 0 ~I 16 13 IITII 1 II 0 0 II 0 ~II 0 0 IITII 0 II 0 I 0 II 0 IT] 15 II 14 IITII 0 II 2 II 0 II 0 lrotail7l5 II 73 [TII 1 II 3 II 2 II 0 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM Page 1 of 2 Native White White American ITotall Female Male Female II 0 11~1 17 II 65 I I 0 11~1 25 IIEJ 0 11:JD18I II~ 0 11~1 21 II~ 1 11~1 20 II~ 0 11=:IJ1 I IIJJ 1 11~1 17 II~ 2 IDfill 119 I[ 415 I .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003130\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data 6 . General Information  E I I\nCount results for 1999-2000 for Schools: ROBINSON ELEM SCHOOL (6003110) 1111 y-.. . ... , 1111 r-XX. Ii\u0026amp; ILEZiZZ lI - IGra, African African Asian Asian American American Male Female Male Female ~II 6 II 3 IIIII 0 ~II 2 II 7 IIIII 0 ~II 2 II 7 IITII 0 ~II 7 II 10 III.II 0 ~II 4 II 4 IIIII 0 ~II 8 II 8 IIIII 0 CIII 5 II 3 IIIII 0 !Tota! 11 34 II 42 [TII 0 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM Hispanic Hispanic Nati~ Nati~ IWM1 WMe Male Female AmMearilcea n AFmeemriaclaen Ma Ie Fe ma 1e [Totall II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 11 II 45 I II 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 21 II~ II 0 1 II 0 II 0 11~1 18 II}!] II 1 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 19 II~ II 0 1 II 0 II 1 11~1 19 II~ II 0 0 II 0 II 0 IIJDI 16 II~ II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1211 II}?] II 2 II 2 II 0 II 1 IOilll 125 II3 82 I Page I of 2 .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l l 0\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 2 6 . General Information  : : I ] II .........!.t.. ....... Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: SCOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003111) 1ml f B African African A . n Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White American American ,:~~e American American ITotII Male Female Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 3 II 3 l[III 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 11=1]7 1 II~ ~II 5 II 4 IOJI 0 II 0 0 I 0 0 [TII 9 II~ t\u0026gt;\u0026lt;-- ~II 5 II 4 llIII 0 II 0 0 0 0 IITII 5 ll]D ~II 3 I 1 llIII 0 II 0 0 0 0 11=u11 [ill ~II 6 1 l[III 0 II 0 II 0 0 0 IIJDI 8 lfKJ ~II 6 1 l[III 0 II 0 II 0 0 0 IITII 5 11J!J ~II 1 5 l[III 0 II 0 II 0 0 II 0 ll=rJI 11 II][] jTota! II 29 19 [TII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 10[]1 46 IDEJ TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l l l \u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 2 6 . General Information  I II II : l\nfr Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: SHERWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003112) IGra, African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White ro .. I American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female .~II 8 II 6 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 lf~I 23 II~ ~II 7 II 6 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 I 0 11~1 21 II~ vXX......\u0026gt;................, lill ~I 7 II 11 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 IIJDI 21 ll~ 01 9 II 9 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 IQ[]I 15 II~ ~I 16 3 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 lr~I 15 I~ ~II 15 3 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 [fill 23 IIB ~II 5 7 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 IIJIJI 22 ll}g] jTota!j\\ 67 45 IC[JI 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 ICiilll 140 \\j 387 j TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr .cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 12\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Pagel of 2 ' . Gener.al lnforroation  ' : II t .........t. ......... Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: SYLVAN HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003113) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American rot,1 Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 6 II 9 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 I 0 11~1117 II~ ~11 5 II 8 IITII 0 1 0 II 0 0 1~11 15 II~ e----.--.-.....-.....-........ ..... 1:1,1 w=\"'\"'\"'\"\"\"\" 1111 ~II 12 II 7 III.II 0 1 0 II 0 0 11~1116 IIJTI ~JI 8 II 5 !III! 0 0 0 I 0 0 11~1212 [~ ~II 10 II 10 IITII 0 I 1 2 0 II 0 11~1110 II~ ~11 14 II 16 IIIII 0 II 0 0 1 II 0 11~1119 [fil ~II 3 II 4 IIIII 0 II 0 1 0 II 0 IIIII 16 [ill \\Total \\I 58 II 59 ICDI 0 II 3 3 1 II 0 l~I 115 113I s7 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM .. ./search_enr .cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003113\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=htrnl\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: TAYLOR ELEM SCHOOL (6003141) 111. . . .1.........1.\n. . -. - . X .  e\u0026lt;:X.,-,.,.,: B!flll \\Gradel African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White IToI American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 11 II 15 II.Ill 0 II 0 1 II 0 0 II~] 16 II~ ~II 14 II 5 IIIII 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 11~1219 II~ ~II 9 II 9 IIIII 0 I 0 0 II 0 0 11~1 10 ll]D ~II 12 II 11 IIIJI 0 0 0 II 0 0 II~] 25 ll}D ~II 11 II 16 11::I:01 1 0 II 0 II 0 I 0 10[]1 22 II~ ~II 11 II 5 IIIII 0 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 IIJDI 13 10 \\Total II 68 II 61 [TI\\ (! l II 1 II 0 II 0 ID:illl1 '15 I\\3 131 TERMS: ..  EE: Elementary- Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 4 l \u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: TOLLESON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (6003106) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White American American American American rolall Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 8 I 8 11~121 II 4 II 1 II 0 II 0 11~13 1 II~ ~II 6 8 IIIII 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 19 II~ y\u0026gt;x.. ~II 5 8 IIIII 0 II 2 II 3 II 0 II 0 11~1 17 II~ ~II 10 5 IIIII 0 II 2 2 II 0 0 11~1118 II~ ~II 11 I 5 ll~II 0 II 1 1 II 0 0 11=:D20 I II~ ~II 3 II 8 IIIII 0 II 1 1 II 0 0 11~1114 II~ ~II 2 II 1 [TII 0 II 0 1 II 0 0 11=:D0 I [TI ~II 1 II 5 I 0 0 I 0 0 II 1 0 11~1 22 II][] lrotal II 46 II 43 I 2 3 I 10 9 II 1 0 1111s11o41 114I 10 1111 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten .. ./search_enr.cgi ?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 06\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 1 6 . General Information . : rn t : : rn Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: FULLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (6003120) IGrad4 African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White AmericanA merican Male Female Male Female American American FemaleI TotII Male Female Male Female e ~II 64 I 55 0 I 1 II 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 49 1124I 0 ~II 68 II 48 IITII 0 II 1 II 1 II 1 II 1 11~1 61 II2 s3I e-.....,............,..X...,,. 1(11 ~II 51 II 61 IIIII 1 II 1 II 1 II 0 II 0 l@JI 49 112291 IT otal II 183 II Hi4 lo:JI 2 II 3 II 2 II 1 II 1 1120111591 II7 22 I ! i6il\u0026amp;iiiii!ii TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded -  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 20\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 1 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (6003116) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American ITotII Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 60 II 70 1o:=111 II 2 II 2 II 0 II 0 11][]192 II~ ~II 62 II 61 [Ill 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 11~1 105 JJ 338 J r.--...........-....-\u0026gt;\u0026gt;:-\u0026gt;.-:-. I Total II 122 II 131 [}JI 1 II 2 II 3 II 0 II 0 IOfill 197 II 649 I ---TERMS: RT  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded -  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l l 6\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 ~----------------------------- -- --------------------------------, General Information - Enrollment Data Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: JACKSONVILLE JR. HIGH SCHOOL (6003117) 1ml 1111\n. ' r:-:.:.\n.\n.:...\n,.. _._._...: .. .--.......-.....-. B!rlll I :ii td:id 1111 - B African African Asan Asian American American M~le Male Female Female ~II 1 II 0 IITJ 0 ~II 67 II 82 IDJ 1 ~II 83 II 63 IITJ 1 ~II 12 II 7 lo=JI 1 01 1 II 3 IITII 0 ~II 2 II 1 IITII 0 \\Tota1!6I6I II 156 ICOI 3 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day Hispanic Hispanic Male Female I 0 II 0 0 I 0 5 2 II 0 2 II 0 0 II 0 0 II 5 4 Page 1 of 2 Native Native White White American American ITotall Male Female Male Female II 0 Ii 0 IIIJI 0 112] II 0 II 0 l12illl1 06 IIa 12 I II 0 II 0 IIJEJ1I1 8 II4 oeI II 0 II 0 11~1 15 I~ II 1 II 0 IIIJI 1 [D II 0 II 0 11=13] 1 II~ II 1 II 0 1121112s43 \\l 857 I .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l l 7 \u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 6 . General :1nforrnaUon ,\nJ : J : II I I \u0026lt; Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL (6003123) IBI IGI African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White ITotaI American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female -::\n: ( . . ~II 0 II 1 IITII 0 0 I 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 0 11=u ~II 0 II 0 IITII 0 0 0 II 0 II 0 ll=c:J0I 11=u ~II 60 II 69 1~11 5 0 4 II 0 II 0 11~1 96 II~ [JIii 50 II 53 [Ill 1 0 1 II 0 II 0 ll]DI 88 11 2351 ~II 54 II 59 1~11 2 1 2 II 0 II 0 11~1 90 11 3261 /Total/I 164 II 182 /OJI 8 1 7 II 0 II 0 1311s ii 274 1s154 / 1111 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003123\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+ R 2/3/00 General Information - Enrollment Data e--... ..........X.,\u0026gt;.....\u0026lt; lrlll u\u0026amp;t at\nz Bi-JI - Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: ~ILLS HIGH SCHOOL (6003125) !Gradel African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic American American Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 47 II 43 IIIII 0 II 3 II 1 DI] 49 II 43 IIIJ 0 II 1 II 0 ~II 28 II 45 11~.101 II 0 II 1 \\Total \\I 124 II 131 [TII 0 II 4 II 2 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search Page 1 of 1 Native Native  White American American ro .. ,1 Male Female e Female II 0 II 0 11}[]14 9 112I3 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 61 112I3 0 II 0 II 0 ll]DI 50 II~ II 0 II 0 ii2 231 116 0 ii6 49 I .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003125\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Pagel of 1 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: NORTH PULASKI HIGH SCHOOL (6003136) lI B Afri~an Afri~an Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Nati~e Nati_ve White White B American American Male Female Male Female American American Male Female Total Male Female Male Female ~ 11 36 11 34 11~ 11 1 11 2 11 2 11  11  1~1I 79 11212 I ~II 32 11 31 11} ]I 11 11 2 11  11  11~1 70 II~ r-X\u0026gt;.\u0026gt;............\u0026gt; B!tll ~II 24 11 24 11~ 11 11 11  11 11  11~1 102 1124 I ~II 92 11 es WI 11 3 11 4 11 4 11 1 11 o 11~1 2s1 11:zill f  I 1 Git i  ii Biii\u0026amp;' TERMS: 1111  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded 1111  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search .. ./search_enr.cgi ?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 136\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: NORTHWOOD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (6003140) 1111 -e-.................,...,..XX-, 1:111 -- !Gradel African African Asian Asian American American Male Female Male Female ~II 0 II 0 1o:=10 1 ~II 0 0 1o=-10 1 ~II 3 0 IITJ 0 [QDI 1 0 IITII 0 ~II 2 0 IITII 0 ~II 0 1 IITII 0 ~II 41 32 IITII 1 ~II 21 II 25 IITJI 1 ~II 36 II 38 IITII 4 ~II 1 II 1 IITJ 0 ~II 0 II 0 IITII 0 ~II 0 II 0 IITII 0 I Tota! 11 105 II 97 IITJI 6 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded Hispanic Hispanic Male Female I 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 2 3 I 1 I 0 0 II 0 0 II 0 0 II 9 5 Page 1 of 2 Native Native White White IToI American American Male Female Male Female 0 II 0 11~1 0 IIJJ 0 II 0 IIIJI 0 11=u 0 II 0 101 3 11=u 0 II 0 11~1 2 11=u I 0 0 IITII 2 II~ 0 0 IITII 0 [:I] 1 0 11]0182 II2 561 0 1 ll:Iilll 96 11 211 I 0 1 11~1 74 11 2641 I 0 0 112]19 [ill II 0 0 [TII 1 [D II 0 0 IITII 0 IIJJ II 1 2 l~I 269 IIM o I .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 40\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 2 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: OAK GROVE IDGH SCHOOL (6003126) B African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White American American American American ITotII Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 27 19 IITJI 0 II 3 0 II 0 0 ll}DI 48 II~ [Q[ll 23 23 IITll 0 II 1 0 II 0 0 11}[]162 II1 oaI r-,............ X.,...X.,..,\u0026gt; ~II 21 28 IITII 1 II 2 2 II 0 0 11~1 63 111951 ~ll 26 22 IITII 1 II 0 0 II 0 0 11}[]164 II~ [JIii 10 12 IITII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 0 ll}ul 36 II~ ~II 13 I 10 IITJI 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 46 lf:Iill !rota! ii 120 II 114 lo:JI 2 II 6 II 2 II 0 II 0 13143 ii 319 1s1o e1 TERMS: -  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 26\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 1 6 . General h1forrnation   I I' I I : ..........J.I. ....... Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: ROBINSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL (6003143) !Gradel African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White AmericanA merican AmericanA merican ITotoll Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female [Ell 14 II 21 IIIJ 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II~] 49 II 1s2 I ~II 21 II 17 IIIII 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 11~1 60 I~ ~JI 23 II 11 IIIJI 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1511 IIJ:0 lill \\Total II 58 II 49 IITJ\\ 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 \\DIDI16 0 114s1 \\ r\"'. . TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary- Ungraded -  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Searcr1 .. ./search_enr. cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;data_level=school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 14 3\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 1 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: ROBINSON HIGH SCHOOL (6003127) IGradel African African A . n Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native IWhit I Whit B American A . Sia merican Male Female Male Female American American Mal: Femaf Total Male Female Male Female e ~II 32 II 23 [Ill 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 11:3]414 II~ ~II 21 II 13 1o=101 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~15 1 II~ r:-\u0026gt;\u0026gt;\u0026gt;X...,...................., ~II 23 II 13 IITJ 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 11~1 48 II~ !Total 11 76 II 49 [J:JI 0 II 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 IOIDI 143 II 432 I ili\u0026amp;iiiiiiilifiliiiiiiiili iii2 TERMS:  EE: Elementary- Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded -  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search .. ./search_enr.cgi ?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 12 7 \u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/3/00 ~---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------, . , ' ' .,. General Information - Enrollment Data 11111 r.:-:.-. ,\n..., . ...... .\u0026gt;.--..... ..-....-.-.-. B!illl fliiibGii\"' 6 . General :1ntorrnaUon   t : : ] : . . .\nCount results for 1999-2000 for Schools: SYLVAN HILLS JR. HIGH SCHOOL (6003122) IGra, African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native White White rotall American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female ~II 46 II 55 1o=111 3 I 2 II 0 II 0 11~17 1 \\\\ 219 \\ ~II 48 II 57 [Ill 0 0 1 II 0 II 0 ll]DI 96 II~ ~II 30 II 44 IITII 0 2 0 II 0 II 0 11~19 9 112\\ 11 ~ll 2 II 5 IITII 0 0 0 II 1 II 0 11~1 7 II 30 I IT otal II 126 II rn-i ICTJI1 5 3 II 1 II 0 l~I 273 11a a11 TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded  MU: Middle School - Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Search Page 1 of 2 .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= l 999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003 l 22\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON \u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page 1 of 1 Count results for 1999-2000 for Schools: SYLVAN ffiLLS HIGH SCHOOL (6003128) IGrad, African African Asian Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Native  White IToI American American American American Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female e Female ~II 35 II 30 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 l!]DI 84 112331 DIii 37 II 38 IIIII 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 II 0 IIEJI 83 112321 r!X.....-..................\n11111 ~II 38 II 33 11~110 II 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 11'][]193 II2 62 I jTotal\\l 110 II H}1 !OJI 0 II 1 II 0 II 0 II 0 ![]fill 26011 727j ~ TERMS:  EE: Elementary - Ungraded  E: Elementary - Ungraded -  MU: Middle School- Ungraded  SS: Secondary - Ungraded  S: Secondary - Ungraded  P: Pre-Kindergarten  PK: Pre-Kindergarten  K: Kindergarten  KA: Kindergarten AM  KF: Kindergarten Full Day  KP: Kindergarten PM Return to Searer, ---z\n-... ~~$9 ~/7~ ~~ .5/ Id~ tp( /3 /~ \",\n/~ ,78Y /io-,,5 .. ./search_enr.cgi?year= 1999\u0026amp;data_level =school\u0026amp;schoolname=6003128\u0026amp;race=ON \u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;submit=Create+R 2/4/00 General Information - Enrollment Data Page I of 2 6 . General Information  I JI Count results for 1999-2000 for Districts: PULASKI COUNTY (6003) 1111 I B African African Asan Asian Hispanic Hispanic Native Nati~ IWhltel White American American M~le Female Male Female American lrotall Male Female Male A~:~:n Male Female 01 252 251 11}]1 5 13 II 10 II 1 II 1 II 485 II 419 1114431 ~II 237 259 112._6I I 14 10 II 0 II 3 11~14 76 111I5 31 ~JI 271 257 III ll 2 11 10 II 0 II 0 11~14139 1114971 ltlll Iii Xii\" ~II 304 261 IIIII 2 13 7 II 1 II 1 14189 II 472 II1 sssI ~I 278 II 252 IITII 7 11 7 II 2 II 2 14165 II 434 111I4 61 ~I 246 II 244 IITII 5 9 I 5 II 2 II 2 11~1 419 1113861 ~II 259 II 246 ll~J 3 9 I 6 II 1 II 0 11]3]4118 1114571 ~II 248 II 252 lrTII 2 II 6 5 1 II 2 11~1 481 1115071 ~I 244 II 245 11::D7I II 13 6 0 II 1 11~14 54 1115351 ~II 251 II 234 IIIII 8 II 5 10 1 II 0 11~14147 111I5 3s ~II 200 II 193 II JIii 2 II 2 3 1 II 0 l~I 391 1112011 ~II 182 II 185 11~_13 1I I 3 3 1 0 II4 58 II 432 1112111 ~II 225 II 234 11~112 II 15 10 2 4 II4 78 II 439 1114131 ~II 62 II 60 IIIII 0 II 2 2 0 0 11~1617 II2 491 jTota!jl 325I9I 3173 II6 3 II 54I I 126 94 13 rn 1614 5II95 78181 190451 TERMS: .. ./search_enr.cgi?year=1999\u0026amp;data_level=district\u0026amp;distname=6003\u0026amp;schoolname=6003125\u0026amp;race=ON\u0026amp;gender=ON\u0026amp;out_format=html\u0026amp;s2/4/00 en 0 \".- ,.' - L!-:P.: t'..\u0026gt;D-U.'i-Ot)L (.UtJI.JTY: PUL t-,~-:.~1v , D~ I PICT: Pulaak 1. C:o. SCHOOL: f' 1.Jr1L [:rJr-!111.l.lll:llr JI\"( ll!'Jr\n~ICT \u0026lt;_~(.,Hf.l[JL C:HL'1 r\nc RY 1) l ,-,Trn CT r.111 L)C1. S1\u0026gt;~c. Schu~l OJ~~- f'Al\u0026gt;E: 1 '..i1 5: :J04f1PT CYCI.E t 0/ 1 :J\nJ 99'7 Rm: 12/08,1999 1'.3:44 t-'-t--------~I G~R_f'~D_1_ E= ___ ~-----------------A~S~T~A_J~J_/ __ 1 AM I ND! AN/ _ -- _ ! TlTI l~L ! ! 1-JHITF ! Hlf~Pt1H re F F M M F II r ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------- ------+-----+-----~-----+---- PK ENROLLl__,-\n)491 561 671 621 601 21 21 01 01 01 0 ------~-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-------+-----~-------~-----+-----~-----+---- ~HOICE! Ul DI 01 01 Oi 01 01 01 QI 01 0 ------ --- f----- .-.- +-----~-j'.-- , --- - +------+-- - ---+------I--- - --\n.... - - , ___._. - -f---. -------1------- K Erm LL l\"1'1131 '1781' '13'7 I 2251 2:il I 151 10 I /JI 21 21 4 -------f------+-----+  \" --+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+----- 1--------1----- CHOICC I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----1------+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-~--  -----+-----~-----+---- 01 l::NROLL I \"1 \",'131 '1851 'IJ 9 I 2521 2511 131 101 61 51 l I ---------+------+-----+-----+------+-----  -------+------- - ------ ------1------+ ----+---- 02 ENROLL I ....1. 531 I 5191 2371 2591 141 101 71 01 3 ------  -----+------+-----+-----+-----f------+-----  -----+-----+-----1-----+---- ---------------------------------------- C:HOICEI 01 01 01 01 ,JI 0 I () I 01 01 0 --- ------- .. - - -  --1------f-- ---- -r---- --- ------1------- -t ----------1- ---- + --- -- 1--- -----  ----- 03 ENl~DLLlv(.i97I 49'71 'l3'7I 2711\n:::\n71 111 101 81 21 01 0 ZS ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----i------+-----i-----1------+-----1-----+---- -~ CHOICI:I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0\n: ~~-~~~\n~~~~\n~~7--~~~7--~\n7--\n~7--\n:~7---~\n7----\n7----~ :----\n7----~7-----+---- 7/f)  f--s-+-- --\"~-'-\n-'-!\nC....C~..C~..C\nC..'--~---_-_-_-_~-_c,.+-.c-._.1__-\n.c.-._\n.c_..-7-\"\n-'~--_---_.-._c-\n..c.c\nc\n._...-+._ _--__1- _-'--_~c-'\n:C_.-..__'---_~---_-__--_...-~cc~cc_\n..co.-\"~+\"-.-c--.~-l- -_-_---____ -._.c_\n___+ ___-_--------- --------7,,~\"'~-.\n\u0026lt;J-,.J'------- ,. ---------+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+--- --- +--- - --+-- --- ------+---- - ------+- --- -1\"~  ~ 05 ~~~~~=!::'::~: ~:~!-!- ~=~1--=~~1--~~:~= -=--1---~--1_--:_ : __~_!-_- --_=_!_-__-_- ----~--_-+-----_--_-_- I p\\D ~'{ ~~-~~\n~~~~:r-\n~~ ~----~~\n~----~~~ -~--\n~:7--\n,\n-~- -:~-----\n--: --~~ ----~7---  \n:---\n+----- 1t\n, Y \\ ./ A ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-------.J.--------1------- +--- ---+------- 1------1----- ------,,~~---? \\ ~ :\n,p- __:_~ ~:~~1---=-1-----=!----=1:----------==~ ------=!----~-=--~------=-1-=-- --=-+~__--_ --__--__-_--__- _-=--- ----- '5fa,.,. ,~,( .JP '-\nJf(J 07 r-Nl:GLLl-,,]571 5141 4181\n'.!591 246! 91 l,I U 31 ti O /JI ----- __._ __,_ _- -I------ 1------+-----+-----1- ------i ----I--- --t--- - --I------!------,------ c\nH  l CE: J ()I '.JI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENfWLL I .:.\u0026lt;:,071 5071 481 I 2481 2521 61 5 I 31 21 l I 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----- -------f------+------1------+---- CHOICt.J ,1 I 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 O! 0 ------ ---+-------1-------+-- ----+-----+----- !-----. -------1 ----+-------+-------1------ ~---- t-:NR-OLLI10179t qqeeI 1et6qI eso2I 2a1eI 1(50 I 71.1 001 81 I 181 i'S ------+-----+-----+,----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----1------+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ----------+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----f-----+---- Has '.Jtiur dit,t\nrict\nvo!.,ed to partir:ip2te :i.n Schoo) Choice? v ~ Lt/.\\: i.,O-P:1- d,~: -._,._,~_1,,rl.lNTY: l'ULAL-W, 1 1 Uf lL t:f,f(l(\"il.U1f'NT Wi G::HUI ll HlfllI !..:CHlJOL CHOICi: BY '.JCllOOI_ Ol-1 OCT r-UPII. r-.,ll\u0026lt;(l! .. L!11.-ii H, r,1.r,\u0026gt;1.c1 :-.C'-itJUL C~lt!!CF B\\ l)rc1nti:i QI! o: Ft\"iDF: l~ '.. [ fi: 4041H' T l-:\n-  L/,\nI\\. -!-,0 - C\nJ - (l(l() COUNTY: f-'UL /1S!-\\J DTSTRJ Cl: Pt1 la,. k i. SCHOOi. Spec Schrl1 U1-\nt. f-'AGf: 2 ciJS: :t04f/PT 10/15/1999 1-'+---------'-1-=G\"-R\"r--',\"D-=E~ ,__I ______ --'---------'---------- __ I __\n\\G!_t\\l~I/ ___ I ~.lf1_ IND]~N/ ,, -\" ',. ,, l ,7 -,, ,. - ' -20 2, \" '25 - \" -,\". -3'l ,-, -,,,\n \" SJ -... ITO I ,'IL I I l~HITF 1- M F M 11 r1 F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLL 1 -..r.33:51 :}631 4541 2441 2451 131 61 21 71 01 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----~------+------+-----+-----+------~------ .. ---- CHOICI:I 01 01 QI 01 IJI ') l 01 01 () I 0 ------ ---+----- .. -- .. ---!-------+- --- -+----- - - ----+-------1-----I- ------+-------1----- +----- 10 F.NROLLl~391 5741 4471 2511 2341 51 101 91 81 11 0 ------ -----+-----+-----+-----  -----+------+-----  -----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+------  ----+------~------+-----  -----+---- 11 ENl~OLLl'-\"1c!Oll 3991 3'?11 ~!001 1'?31 21 31 101 21 li 0 ------+----- ----- ' - - -- -+--- -1------1------f--- -- - -- -- - --- +--------I------+----- r:HOICCI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----of-----+-----+--------------+----- 12 l':NROLLl~711 4501 11321 1821 1851 31 31 41 31 .ti 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+----- -----+-----+-----+---- \u0026lt;\nH  ICi:I 01 01 01 01 01 ':,1 01 01 01 01 U ---- ------+---- -+-----+----- -- ----l------1- - --- -1 -----l -- - ---C -----I-------- 1-------f------ EE ENIWLLI 01 01 QI () 1 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----1------+---- CHOICI:I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+----- ------+-----+-----+-------+-----+-----~------+-----~-----+---- SM r.NRlJLLI 01 01 01 () I Oi 01 01 ()j 01 01 0 \u0026lt;:HOICCI 01 01 01 QI Ql 01 {) I 'JI 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SS F.tm  LL I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----4-----  -------- .. -----+-------1------ ---- C:HOlCI:I 01 01 IJ I 01 01 01 0 I 01 01 0 ---------+-- -- -- ----+---- -+------+----f------ -f-- --+---- l----1------ i ------+---- J:f~l=:BLL 1 55161 1c,v\nq1 ti211 0771 Ql!i?I 3-11 7.11 .J.!'il idQI ill ------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----~------+---- CHOICI:I 01 01 01 01 O I 01 01 01 01 01 0 --------+------~-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----~-----+-----+------+---- /l,\u0026lt;\u0026gt;f!5: 1S~5'1\"6'63 ,\n.~1~.rt:\u0026gt; '~~ 1-1- 43\n1 1, 14- ~****~(\" J'-,t.*~if *~if *f *i=*** lf*~f-~,Jf ~*i.\"**'41:if**-1:-J\u0026lt;-**it-~if.*.\\'.if ~-:~~1 ~-- i!\"*~-t'.  J.. fr\n},Jl-****\nf*-lf- ~* U--3::.********** NUMBER OF GRADUATES FOR PREVIOUS SCHOOL VEAR TO\"IAL ---------+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATES! 9751 3381 3601 1321 132! 31 21 21 51 01 1 ---------+-----+- --- --~------o/---- -+-------- -  f------ --!-----+ ---- --+--- --_ .. ------+------ - ----- ---- - ------------------------) ----------------------------------- 10-2s-ss\n10:49AM\nOISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # I/ 15 ' ,vLASEI COUNTY s, BCIA.L SC. ..H OO.. L DISTILi CT ,\n. .. . BUSINESS OPPICB ~-. PACSIIIILB TUNSlllffAL SHBBT COMPANY: DATB: z c  O't\u0026gt;M o 0Gt''f9 PAXNUMBBR: TO'I\"ALNO. OPPAGBS _\"\"$..~ ._. .\\._ - _d)_~.........----JN-a._u_o lN_G_c__O_ VB lt_: I_$_ ,. .. . . . PHONB NUMBBR: -----------------. . DUR.GENT .\n  .  . 0 FOll llBVIBW DPLBASB COMMBNT. =-=-==-=------------------. ...,. . ,t-tAt41\u0026lt;~ 1-02.. r.1N'N' \u0026amp;--o\\A.T1 l\\E ~. J:r \"~ MC -ro ~Ml$ Cl-\\lr~,es l \\J\nf . \"\"PtoG-~f\\1. lleitr 1lM ~ --R.\\61tF'ft tSJ ~c_,,1,1.!c 11~\u0026amp;:-~ IS T\\4 Gt,~ ef~~  f?:\nP0 -m~~s /f.-:r \\iri,~ ~/ .J _p,,.4) u?. 44c-'l2X22~1 \"\"--1- ---------------- o')\nJ -~ ?''' ......... COUNTY HCIU. IC OOL aH'lalCT 10-28-99\n10:49AM\nDIST~ICT OFFICE :490+1274 # 2/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 PAGE 1 (10:35:34) GRADE WHITE BLACK OTHER BLACK TOTAL BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS PER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 Adkins Elementary LEA: 6003090 Grade Span: PK - 5 Pre-Kindergarten 18 4 1 3 3 /0 7 0 I 1 56 Kindergarten 50 10 12 14 12 1 1 52 Grade l 60 22 8 16 14 0 0 50 Grade 2 45 14 9 12 10 0 0 49 Grade 3 43 10 14 10 9 0 0 44 Grade 4 44 10 13 12 9 0 0 48 Grade 5 38 11 8 12 6 1 0 47 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K - 6 TOTALS 280 77 64 76 60 2 1 49 SCHOOL TOTALS 298.,,,. 81 S1 67 79 67 2 -f 2 49 -! J-Y~ 02 Crystal Hill Magnet LEA: 6003093 Grade Span: PK - 6 Pre-Kindergarten 54 8 ~\u0026lt;-t 18 12 :\n..~ 16 0 0 0 52 Kindergarten 109 35 24 27 22 0 1 45 Grade 1 104 29 21 26 27 1 0 51 Grade 2 104 30 23 26 24 1 0 48 Grade 3 111 38 21 23 29 0 0 47 Grade 4 110 24 28 33 22 3 0 50 Grade 5 104 24 28 32 19 1 0 49 Grade 6 107 26 32 25 24 0 0 46 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K - 6 TOTALS 749 206 177 192 167 6 1 48 SCHOOL TOTALS 803.,... 214 ~7195 204 183 6 1 48 i,'?57 7 03 Baker Interdistrict LEA: 6003092 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 42 23 13 2 4 0 0 14 Grade 1 43 21 17 3 2 0 0 12 Grade 2 52 26 23 0 3 0 0 6 Grade 3 50 21 18 7 4 0 0 22 Grade 4 40 16 16 2 6 0 0 20 Grade 5 57 27 24 2 4 0 0 11 Grade 6 54 16 23 8 6 0 1 26 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 338  150 1134 24 29 0 1 16\n2_'7:J ~::,. 10-28-99\n10:49AM\nDISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 3/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) GRADE TOTAL t-05 Bayou Meto Elementary Kindergarten 79 Grade 1 77 Grade 2 98 Grade 3 75 Grade 4 98 Grade 5 96 Grade 6 57 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 580.,,. 08 College Station Elementary Kindergarten 19 Grade 1 14 Grade 2 19 Grade 3 30 Grade 4 44 Grade 5 62 Grade 6 53 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 241 11 Dupree Elementary Kindergarten 50 Grade 1 63 Grade 2 82 Grade 3 55 Grade 4 56 Grade 5 49 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 355  WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003094 32 46 37 39 42 51 39 33 40 52 47 46 32 22 0 0 269 ~ 289 .5~ LEA: 6003135 2 1 1 1 4 1 2 5 12 16 14 20 12 12 0 0 47 103 56 LEA: 6003099 16 16 13 22 31 22 14 26 15 19 13 17 0 0 102\n)~ 122 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6\na- 6 10 6 8 4 9 5 13 8 5 7 11 15 13 12 0 0 69 ~ 57 Id 6 10 12 9 14 10 7 6 15 6 10 8 0 0 64 49 //~ PAGE 2 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 5 2 /0 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 84 0 0 86 0 0 74 2 0 70 2 2 27 1 1 42 2 2 47 0 0 0 7 5 52 I~ Grade Span: K - 5 1 1 32 3 4 33 1 4 29 2 0 24 0 1 38 1 0 37 0 0 0 8 ,, 10 32 10-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nDIST~ICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 4/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 12 Fuller Elementary Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed K - 6 TOTALS SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 38 72 49 43 56 60 48 45 0 373 411 ....... 13 Fuller Jr High School Grade 7 228 Grade 8 247 Grade 9 230 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 705 ...- 15 Harris Elementary Kindergarten 27 Grade 1 44 Grade 2 38 Grade 3 47 Grade 4 35 Grade 5 43 Grade 6 21 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 25s-- WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003100 6 /3 7 15 16 12 12 6 11 9 14 12 11 11 10 15 7 0 0 80 81 86 n/ 88 LEA: 6003120 69 44 68 60 66 50 0 0 203 ~f,7 154 LEA: 6003102 4 4 10 7 5 7 6 11 10 6 8 7 3 4 0 0 46 46 qr\n- BLACK BOYS GIRLS 10 ~..\n14 21 19 11 13 14 10 18 14 19 18 14 13 15 7 0 0 112 94 122 108 ~~o 61 52 65 48 49 61 0 0 175 ~-a(, 161 7 12 19 8 15 11 19 9 10 8 11 16 8 6 0 0 89 70 ,5~ PAGE 3 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: PK - 6 1 0 63 1 0 56 1 0 49 1 1 56 0 1 57 0 0 62 0 0 56 0 1 49 0 0 0 3 3 55 4 1 3 56 Grade Span: 7 - 9 1 1 50 4 2 46 2 2 48 0 0 0 7 5 48 /-::).\nGrade Span: K - 6 0 0 70 0 0 61 0 0 68 2 0 60 1 0 51 0 1 63 0 0 67 0 0 0 3 -i 1 62 10-28-99\n10:49AM\nDISTAICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 5/ 15 I.....--~-===========-==-===-====-=======-.::..::.:...\n\n.:.\n.::.-\n.:.\n--:...\n:-=::..:...:..=-----=-:...:\n.:.::.-\n.:\n__-\n..__ DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 4 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER 17 Oakbrooke Elementary LEA: 6003139 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 44 14 18 2 10 0 0 27 Grade 1 65 26 23 8 7 0 1 23 Grade 2 62 14 32 8 8 0 0 26 Grade 3 62 24 22 4 10 1 1 23 Grade 4 78 27 24 12 14 1 0 33 Grade 5 62 23 24 8 7 0 0 24 Grade 6 so 21 15 6 7 1 0 26 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 423......- 149 ~c? 158 48 II) 63 3 ~ 2 26 18 Jacksonville Elementary LEA: 6003103 Grade Span: K - 5 Kindergarten 86 24 20 20 21 1 0 48 Grade 1 92 20 20 20 30 1 1 54 Grade 2 99 21 19 27 28 1 3 56 Grade 3 85 19 21 23 20 1 1 51 Grade 4 84 18 20 24 21 0 1 54 Grade 5 85 22 18 23 20 1 1 51 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 531 ...... 124~~118 137 ~\n140 5 ,:,- 7 52 .yl9 Jacksonville Middle School LEA: 6003116 Grade Span: 6 - 7 Grade 6 332 87 100 67 72 3 3 42 Grade 7 337 105 107 65 59 0 1 37 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 669 ......... 192 ~r} 207 132 131 3 4 39\n,.e,-a 1 10-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nDISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 6/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT {BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 {10:35:34) 20 Jacksonville Grade 10 Grade l1 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS Sr High 21 Landmark Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS 22 Lawson Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 348 289 326 0 963.,.. 48 42 64 62 63 54 55 0 388 ....... 34 30 42 30 54 27 42 0 259 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003123 114 95 91 90 116 90 0 0 321 $,t., 275 LEA: 6003104 16 9 13 11 18 17 18 15 15 16 11 16 15 19 0 0 106 ~Q, 103 LEA: 6003105 15 15 15 9 23 12 14 9 23 21 15 8 17 17 0 0 122 ~,?\n91 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 61 68 50 53 54 59 0 0 165 ~J-/5180 10 10 9 8 11 18 17 11 20 12 14 13 7 14 0 0 88 111 86 l 3 3 2 5 2 4 2 6 4 1 2 6 2 0 0 26 ~~ 17 PAGE 5 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: 10 - 12 1 9 37 3 2 36 3 4 35 0 0 0 7 ~~ 15 36 Grade Span: K - 6 2 l 42 0 1 40 0 0 45 1 0 45 0 0 51 0 0 so 0 0 38 0 0 0 3 ~ 2 45 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 12 0 1 17 0 0 17 1 0 20 0 0 19 0 1 11 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 2 17 3 10-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nOISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 7/ ,s PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 23 Tolleson Eiementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 63 81 66 62 61 49 54 0 436- 2 7 Arnold Drive Elementary Kindergarten 72 Grade 1 70 Grade 2 63 Grade 3 60 Grade 4 48 Grade 5 51 Grade 6 28 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 392.,. 28 Oak Grove Elementary Pre-Kindergarten 65 Kindergarten 92 Grade 1 39 Grade 2 47 Grade 3 61 Grade 4 48 Grade 5 44 Grade 6 43 Special Ed 0 K - 6 TOTALS 374 SCHOOL TOTALS 439 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003106 30 23 23 33 27 19 24 18 21 18 9 20 20 19 0 0 154 ~o\u0026gt;1-5/0 LEA: 6003137 32 19 32 20 19 20 23 19 15 16 21 13 6 12 0 0 148 ,::\n.,i, 7 119 LEA: 6003108 19 ~~ 20 31 33 11 14 15 19 27 17 14 22 15 16 15 15 0 0 128 136 14 7 .303 156 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 3 6 8 9 9 10 6 9 12 6 12 5 4 9 0 0 54 /fC\u0026gt;~ 54 8 6 8 6 5 14 6 7 4 8 8 8 6 4 0 0 45 ~i 53 15 .:rl 9 11 13 2 10 5 5 9 7 4 7 5 5 4 9 0 0 40 56 55 /d-P 65 PAGE 6 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 1 0 14 5 3 21 0 1 29 2 3 24 2 2 30 2 1 35 1 1 24 0 0 0 13 ~..\n11 25 Grade Span: K - 6 3 4 19 2 2 20 4 l 30 2 3 22 3 2 25 1 0 31 0 0 36 0 0 0 15 ~7 12 25 Grade Span: PK - 6 1 ~ 1 37 2 2 26 2 0 31 3 0 21 0 1 26 1 0 23 3 0 23 0 0 30 0 0 0 11 3 26 12 I~ 4 27 10-2s-ss\n10:49AM:OISTRlCT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 8/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT {BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 1--2 9 Oak Grove Jr/Sr High Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS 31 Robinson Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS 32 Robinson Sr. High Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 152 169 199 184 99 112 0 915  50 45 57 52 66 56 55 0 381......- 175 130 129 0 434- WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003126 57 47 59 62 81 64 69 65 39 36 42 47 0 0 347 4,\u0026lt;,g 321 LEA: 6003110 23 20 26 10 25 22 25 17 29 19 27 19 24 16 0 0 179 ~-~ 123 LEA: 6003127 74 44 44 51 44 48 0 0 162 143 -'o~ BLACK BOYS GIRLS 27 19 23 23 21 28 26 22 10 13 13 10 0 0 120 -5115 .Q~ 4 3 6 3 2 7 2 7 7 10 4 4 8 7 0 0 33\n~ 41 32 24 21 13 24 13 0 0 77 ,~7 50 PAGE 7 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: 7 - 12 2 0 30 2 0 27 2 3 25 1 1 26 1 0 23 0 0 21 0 0 0 8 I\n:\u0026gt;-, 4 26 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 14 0 0 20 1 0 16 0 1 17 1 0 26 0 2 14 0 0 27 0 0 0 2 ~ 3 19 Grade Span: 10 - 12 0 1 32 1 0 26 0 0 29 0 0 0 1 1 29 ,\n.. 10-28-99\n10:49AM\nDISTRJCT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 9/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 34 Scott Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS 35 Alpha Academy Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS -\\--36 Northwood Jr High Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL School 27 20 24 21 10 25 19 0 146...., 3 10 42 40 10 9 0 114 ..... 258 274 268 0 800V WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003111 9 12 6 7 6 9 7 5 5 1 10 8 7 5 0 0 50 q7 47 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 1 4 5 5 3 6 6 0 5 3 4 4 1 1 1 0 30 411 19 LEA: NOT ASSIGNED 2 0 1 0 4 1 3 1 13 6 12 9 20 8 6 4 3 2 1 3 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 45 ~~ 20 25 43 18 LEA: 6003140 97 80 41 34 120 96 22 25 105 77 36 38 0 0 0 0 322 S)7 253 99 /'1 ~ 97 PAGE 8 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 22 0 0 35 0 0 38 0 0 43 0 0 40 0 0 28 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 Grade Span: 7 - 12 0 0 33 0 1 40 1 1 50 1 1 25 1 0 40 0 0 33 0 0 0 3 ~ 3 38 Grade Span: 7 - 9 2 4 29 6 5 17 6 6 28 0 0 0 14 ~9 15 25 10-28-99:i0:49AM\nDlSTRlCT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 10/ 15 -~---------------------------------------------------- --- - --- .. - -  - ~------ ..  - - . - ---. - DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 9 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER 37 Sherwood Elememtary LEA: 6003112 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 52 16 22 5 7 1 1 23 Grade 1 57 16 23 9 8 0 1 30 Grade 2 59 21 21 7 9 1 0 27 Grade 3 65 21 22 9 13 0 0 34 Grade 4 58 21 16 10 11 0 0 36 Grade 5 54 17 15 17 5 0 0 41 Grade 6 76 33 24 16 3 0 0 25 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 421\" 145 ~\"6~ 143 73 ,a~ 56 2 ...\n2 31 39 Sylvan Hills Elementary LEA: 6003113 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 40 15 16 4 4 0 1 20 Grade 1 49 16 16 6 11 0 0 35 Grade 2 51 21 16 5 8 1 0 25 Grade 3 56 21 16 11 7 1 0 32 Grade 4 71 33 22 9 6 1 0 21 Grade 5 56 22 13 9 10 1 1 34 Grade 6 74 24 20 14 15 1 0 39 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 397,.,, 152 ~11119 58 ,, 1 61 5 7 2 30 )\u0026lt; 40 Sylvan Hills Jr High LEA: 6003122 Grade Span: 7 - 9 Grade 7 284 100 73 46 57 5 3 36 Grade 8 301 98 96 48 56 1 2 35 Grade 9 278 101 99 29 45 4 0 27 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 863 299 268 123 158 10 5 33 :Slo7 ,\nii 15 10-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nDISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 11/ 15 __\n:_,.......:===============-========..:.::..::--=---=-..:..:..::..__:....___\n_:....:.::...._--=..:.\n.....:___\n_ _______ _ PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (SY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) GRADE TOTAL 41 Sylvan Hills Sr High Grade 10 231 Grade 11 230 Grade 12 262 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 723 42 Clinton Magnet School Pre-Kindergarten 74 Kindergarten 107 Grade 1 103 Grade 2 91 Grade 3 92 Grade 4 106 Grade 5 84 Grade 6 71 Special Ed 0 K - 6 TOTALS 654 SCHOOL TOTALS 728- 45 Cato Elementary Kindergarten 70 Grade 1 63 Grade 2 75 Grade 3 67 Grade 4 60 Grade 5 72 Grade 6 73 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 48QV WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003128 86 80 73 81 95 92 0 0 254 ~o'1 253 LEA: 6003095 17 ~ 18 25 26 22 23 22 23 24 17 26 16 13 14 24 12 0 0 156 131 173~ 149 LEA: 6003129 29 23 23 25 30 18 23 27 23 20 22 23 25 27 0 0 175 ,~~ 1 63 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 33 32 38 37 39 33 0 0 110 ~102 ~I 22 ~ 14 27 24 25 30 18 24 22 29 33 27 24 28 16 16 0 0 165 178 187 j19 192 6 7 6 7 12 12 7 9 7 10 14 13 8 11 0 0 60 69 ,~'f PAGE 10 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: 10 - 12 0 0 28 0 1 33 2 1 27 0 0 0 2 -1 2 29 Grade Span: PK - 6 2 Q 1 49 3 2 48 2 1 53 3 1 46 0 0 55 4 0 57 3 2 62 1 2 45 0 0 0 16 8 52 18 ~/ 9 52 Grade Span: K - 6 3 2 19 0 2 21 2 1 32 1 0 24 0 0 28 0 0 38 1 1 26 0 0 0 7 6 27 I~ 10-2a-ss\n10:49AM:DIST~ICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 12/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) ~46 Pinewood Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 84 79 87 83 83 74 0 49011\"\" 47 Mills University High Grade 10 226 Grade 11 231 Grade 12 190 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 647 ...... ~ 48 Jacksonville Jr High Grade 7 0 Grade 8 363 Grade 9 385 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 748.,..... WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003130 30 17 33 18 34 27 27 17 24 24 19 24 0 0 167 f 127 ~7 LEA: 6003125 81 46 77 60 60 48 0 0 218 154 J'i' LEA: 6003117 0 0 113 103 124 122 0 0 237 ..,~225 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 17 16 14 14 14 10 16 21 18 15 17 13 0 0 96 !~89 50 43 47 44 34 46 0 0 131 1133 ~~ 0 0 63 84 78 55 0 0 141 139 .,~(\u0026gt; PAGE 11 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 5 3 1 39 0 0 35 0 2 28 1 1 45 2 0 40 0 1 41 0 0 0 6 I I 5 38 Grade Span: 10 - 12 5 1 41 3 0 39 1 1 42 0 0 0 9 ti 2 41 Grade Span: 8 - 9 0 0 0 0 0 40 4 2 35 0 0 0 4 2 37 (,, ,o-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nDISTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 13/ 15  -------- -------------------'-------- -'...--.\n_\n_\n-\n.._\n.- _\n-\n..-\n.-\n._..-\n__--  -- ----  - ' -~---  --~- - ..... ----- _____ _..:..\n. ____ ,. ------- - PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 49 North Pulaski High Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS 50 Robinson Jr High Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL 273 216 247 0 735  151 142 163 0 455......- 51 Murrell Taylor Elementary Kindergarten 40 Grade 1 61 Grade 2 66 Grade 3 51 Grade 4 68 Grade 5 77 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 3631,,\"\"' WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003136 116 77 74 71 92 103 0 0 282 j'3~251 LEA: 6003143 68 49 43 61 78 51 0 0 189 ~161 LEA: 6003141 14 13 19 16 21 26 20 11 21 24 29 21 0 0 124 111 ~~?- BLACK BOYS GIRLS 36 34 32 31 24 24 0 0 92 I~ I 89 13 21 20 17 23 11 0 0 56 ,s. 49 /0 9 4 11 14 14 4 10 9 11 12 11 15 0 0 66 /~~ 58 PAGE 12 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: 10 - 12 6 4 26 5 3 29 3 1 19 0 0 0 14 ~-- 8 25 Grade Span: 7 - 9 0 0 23 0 1 26 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 23 Grade Span: K - 5 0 0 33 0 1 41 1 0 27 0 1 37 0 0 34 0 1 34 0 0 0 1 -\u0026gt;/ 3 34 ,o-2a-ss\n10:49AM\nDlSTRICT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 14/ 1 5 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT {BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) 52 Pine Forest Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS GRADE TOTAL Elementary 33 62 77 92 86 62 63 0 475- 53 Bates Elementary Kindergarten 46 Grade 1 54 Grade 2 56 Grade 3 69 Grade 4 63 Grade 5 53 Grade 6 36 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 3 77._..- WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003142 13 18 29 18 38 22 38 32 35 28 23 22 26 19 0 0 202 JI.,/ 159 LEA: 6003146 12 8 12 10 15 11 16 20 11 9 16 10 8 6 0 0 90 ,~1 74 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 1 1 7 6 3 11 10 9 13 7 9 3 8 8 0 0 51 7(, 45 13 13 17 13 11 19 18 15 24 19 10 17 10 12 0 0 103 108 ,\nII PAGE 13 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 6 0 2 21 1 2 18 2 1 21 2 1 23 2 3 19 1 1 25 0 0 0 8 I 't 10 20 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 57 2 0 56 0 0 54 0 0 48 0 0 68 0 0 51 0 0 61 0 0 0 2 0 56\n.., 10-28-99\n10:49AM\nDISTR1CT OFFICE\n490+1274 # 15/ 15 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER l, 1999 DATE 10-28-1999 (10:35:34) DISTRICT REPORT Elementary Grades Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 ...- Grade 6 :::r::\n/Jc \".\" ~ ~ ,, Pl' le.-, Totals: Grades: 1 - 6 Totals: Grades: K - 6 Totals: Grades: PK - Junior High Grades Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Totals: Grades 7 - 9 Senior High Grades Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 GRADE TOTAL 249 1436 1466 1567 1537 1594 1482 1408 9054 10490 6 -lQ,739 -~~~ 1\n54,07 1413 1506 1565 4484 + ::}3::). 1477 1205 1275 Totals: Grades 10 - 12 3957 \u0026amp;i13 Special Ed 0 DISTRICT TOTALS 19180 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6030000 54 66 485 444 487 423 528 480 510 447 500 477 469 444 456 426 2950 2697 3435 3141 =:4~7 3107 - OCJ ~ ~107 t.,~o'J 498 400 505 479 568 469 1571 1348 +'8 7 +IOC\u0026gt; 560 415 401 391 452 431 1413 1237 zo1J ~S$ 0 '1~1., 0 6473 5792 ,~~~\"5.- BLACK BOYS GIRLS 62 60 229 239 258 259 252 266 278 268 314 268 285 252 256 245 1643 1558 1872 1797 1-9~31 1857 - 7:)... /8~7 /~ ~~~~ 254 242 244 254 248 247 746 743 ..-t..7 +-,a 244 227 199 194 190 186 633 607 H~~ I\"'/~\n)- 0 ~~\u0026lt;oi 0 3313 3207 ~?\n)c, PAGE 14 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: PK - 12 4 3 49 22 17 33 19 20 35 22 19 33 20 14 36 24 11 37 17 15 36 13 12 36 115 91 35 137 108 35 141 111 35 -3 a~7o 1:38 1or .\ni\"'1'4, 10 9 35 13 11 33 19 14 32 42 34 33 t~ H3 14 17 32 14 6 33 9 7 29 37 30 31 i.-... (, 1 0 1.../1 0 o~a7 220 175 34 j\"i? PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-2000 October 26, 1999 Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ann: RECEI\\IED OCT 2 G 1999 OFFIOCFE DESEGREMGAOTNIIOTNO RlriIG As I promised, I am enclosing the enrollment report of the Pulaski County Special School District for October 1, 1999. This report is broken down by school, grade, race and gender. My computer expert in Management Information Systems believes these numbers are accurate and reliable. It shows that the District has slowed its population decline and has almost stabilized over last year with a loss of only 283 pupils. I am happy that I was able to work things out to get this report to you in a timely fashion so that you can proceed with your Annual Report. With personal best wishes, I remain ps Enclosure c Eddie Collins, Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel Gary Smith, Ed.D. Superintendent of Education Qb\u0026gt;P~ 7 ~--\n//, 0 =7~8' ~? ~/ C:/ ~_\n).\n/ / ~ /1( ~7c\n9/ g7 ~ \"3/~ 0 / t2\\ll {2,t.,m- /. ~7 -t/? .:=,7\n\u0026gt; //) ~ c) 4/~AA ~ 0 / C\u0026gt; 0 C ~1, //.,vJl)t).O ~S9 ?\u0026lt;\n:, g~ -/ ~3/' ~ .s ~// /41//2 ~8-\nI /CtO ? ..y~ ~~ ~ ~ __. X -~ 0 C\u0026gt; c) C) d c::) ~O~ /SI c\n.? ~\u0026lt;J /3 di}/ c) /Z~/ ~3. ~i ~~() ~~8' /-1/~? ~ -1/10 ~~8 ~'-I- // /0 ~5 d). / d(,. /g' /a' DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 01 Adkins Elementary Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Special Ed K - 6 TOTALS SCHOOL TOTALS 02 Crystal Hill Magnet Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed K - 6 TOTALS SCHOOL TOTALS 03 Baker Interdistrict Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL 18 50 60 45 43 44 38 0 280 298 54 109 104 104 111 110 104 107 0 749 803 42 43 52 50 40 57 54 0 338 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA : 6 0 0 3 0 9 0 4 10 22 14 10 10 11 0 77 3 12 8 9 14 13 8 0 64 LEA : 6 0 0 3 0 9 3 8 35 29 30 38 24 24 26 0 206 18 24 21 23 21 28 28 32 0 177 2 14 --K7l 9 5 LEA : 6 0 0 3 0 9 2 23 21 26 21 16 27 16 0 13 17 23 18 16 24 23 0 150 _/ 134\n2,i1 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 3 14 16 12 10 12 12 0 76 12 27 26 26 23 33 32 25 0 192 7 12 14 10 9 9 6 0 60 16 22 27 24 29 22 19 24 0 167 2 04 t\n'3'\"1/8 3 2 3 0 7 2 2 8 0 4 2 3 4 6 4 6 0 24 29 5~ PAGE 1 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: PK - 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 2 56 52 50 49 44 48 47 0 49 49 Grade Span: PK - 6 0 0 1 1 0 3 l 0 0 6 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 52 45 51 48 47 50 49 46 0 48 48 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 14 12 6 22 20 11 26 0 16 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) GRADE TOTAL 05 Bayou Meto Elementary Kindergarten 79 Grade 1 77 Grade 2 98 Grade 3 75 Grade 4 98 Grade 5 96 Grade 6 58 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 581 08 College Station Elementary Kindergarten 19 Grade 1 14 Grade 2 19 Grade 3 30 Grade 4 44 Grade 5 62 Grade 6 53 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 241 11 Dupree Elementary Kindergarten 50 Grade 1 63 Grade 2 82 Grade 3 55 Grade 4 56 Grade 5 49 Special Ed 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 355 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003094 32 46 37 39 42 51 39 33 40 52 47 46 32 23 0 0 269 ~c/90 LEA: 6003135 2 1 1 1 4 1 2 5 12 16 14 20 12 12 0 0 47 /o3 56 LEA: 6003099 16 16 13 22 31 22 14 26 15 19 13 17 0 0 10~~122 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6 6 ,,,,:). 10 6 8 4 9 5 13 8 5 7 11 15 13 12 0 0 69 /~\u0026lt;:,. 57 6 10 12 9 14 10 7 6 15 6 10 8 0 0 64 49 //~ PAGE 2 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 5 /l\u0026gt; 5 2 Grade Span: K - 6 0 0 84 0 0 86 0 0 74 2 0 70 2 2 27 1 1 42 2 2 47 0 0 0 7 /,\n)- 5 52 Grade Span: K - 5 1 1 32 3 4 33 1 4 29 2 0 24 0 1 38 1 0 37 0 0 0 8 /5' 10 32 DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 12 Fuller Elementary Pre-Kindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed K - 6 TOTALS SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 3 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER LEA: 6003100 Grade Span: PK - 6 38 6 7 10 14 1 0 63 72 15 16 21 19 1 0 56 49 12 12 11 13 1 0 49 43 6 11 14 10 1 1 56 56 9 14 18 14 0 1 57 60 12 11 19 18 0 0 62 48 11 10 14 13 0 0 56 45 15 7 15 7 0 1 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 373 80 81 112 94 3 3 55 411 86 /?/88 122 ~~0108 4 7 3 56 13 Fuller Jr High School LEA: 6003120 Grade Span: 7 - 9 Grade 7 228 69 44 61 52 1 1 50 Grade 8 247 68 60 65 48 4 2 46 Grade 9 230 66 50 49 61 2 2 48 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 705 203 1154 175 4161 7 /~ 5 48\n~ ~~ 15 Harris Elementary LEA: 6003102 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 27 4 4 7 12 0 0 70 Grade 1 44 10 7 19 8 0 0 61 Grade 2 38 5 7 15 11 0 0 68 Grade 3 47 6 11 19 9 2 0 60 Grade 4 35 10 6 10 8 1 0 51 Grade 5 43 8 7 11 16 0 1 63 Grade 6 21 3 4 8 6 0 0 67 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 255 46 7::\n.4. ,6 89 ? 70 3  1 62 /5 DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS PAGE 4 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER 17 Oakbrooke Elementary LEA: 600313 9 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 44 14 18 2 10 0 0 27 Grade 1 65 26 23 8 7 0 1 23 Grade 2 62 14 32 8 8 0 0 26 Grade 3 62 24 22 4 10 1 1 23 Grade 4 78 27 24 12 14 1 0 33 Grade 5 62 23 24 8 7 0 0 24 Grade 6 50 21 15 6 7 1 0 26 Special Ed 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 423 149 158 48 /// 63 3 .:::5 2 26 ,iiJo7 18 Jacksonville Elementary LEA: 6003103 Grade Span: K - 5 Kindergarten 86 24 20 20 21 1 0 48 Grade 1 92 20 20 20 30 1 1 54 Grade 2 99 21 19 27 28 1 3 56 Grade 3 85 19 21 23 20 l 1 51 Grade 4 84 18 20 24 21 0 1 54 Grade 5 85 22 18 23 20 1 1 51 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 531 124 118 137 ~7,740 5 /.3- 7 52 ~,\n,- 19 Jacksonville Middle School LEA: 6003116 Grade Span: 6 - 7 Grade 6 329 86 97 68 72 3 3 43 ')..Grade 7 276 91 87 51 46 0 1 35 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 605 177 / 184 119 1118 3 4 - 39 3~ ~?) 1 --------------------------- DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 5 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 Jacksonville Sr High LEA: 6003123 Grade Span: 10 - 12 Grade 10 348 114 95 61 Grade 11 68 1 9 37 289 91 90 50 53 3 2 36 Grade 12 326 116 90 54 59 3 4 35 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 963 32199 275 165 180 7 .3\u0026gt;\n).. 15 36 #IS 21 Landmark Elementary LEA: 6003104 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 48 16 9 10 10 2 1 42 Grade 1 42 13 11 9 8 0 1 40 Grade 2 64 18 17 11 18 0 0 45 Grade-3 62 18 15 17 11 1 0 45 Grade 4 63 15 16 20 12 0 0 51 Grade 5 54 11 16 14 13 0 0 50 Grade 6 55 15 19 7 14 0 0 38 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 388 106 ~ 103 88 1?-/86 3 .5 ~o 2 45 22 Lawson Elementary LEA: 6003105 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 34 15 15 1 3 0 0 12 Grade 1 30 15 9 3 2 0 1 17 Grade 2 42 23 12 5 2 0 0 17 Grade 3 30 14 9 4 2 1 0 20 Grade 4 54 23 21 6 4 0 0 19 Grade 5 27 15 8 1 2 0 1 11 Grade 6 42 17 17 6 2 0 0 19 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 259 122 91 26 17 1 2 17 C?\u0026lt;'~ -I~ ~ DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 23 Tolleson Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL 63 81 66 62 61 49 54 0 436 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003106 30 23 23 33 27 19 24 18 21 18 9 20 20 19 0 0 154 .\n150 ~o-' BLACK BOYS GIRLS 3 6 8 9 9 10 6 9 12 6 12 5 4 9 0 0 54 r-4\ncf ::i _ PAGE 6 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 1 0 14 5 3 21 0 1 29 2 3 24 2 2 30 2 1 35 1 1 24 0 0 0 13 11 25 :97 27 Arnold Drive Elementary LEA: 6003137 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 72 32 19 8 6 3 4 19 Grade 1 70 32 20 8 6 2 2 20 Grade 2 63 19 20 5 14 4 1 30 Grade 3 60 23 19 6 7 2 3 22 Grade 4 48 15 16 4 8 3 2 25 Grade 5 51 21 13 8 8 1 0 31 Grade 6 28 6 12 6 4 0 0 36 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 392 148 119 45 53 15 12 25 ~tt.7 ?t\n7 28 Oak Grove Elementary LEA: 6003108 Grade Span: PK - 6 Pre-Kindergarten 65 19 20 15 9 1 1 37 Kindergarten 92 31 33 11 13 2 2 26 Grade 1 39 11 14 2 10 2 0 31 Grade 2 47 15 19 5 5 3 0 21 Grade 3 61 27 17 9 7 0 1 26 Grade 4 48 14 22 4 7 1 0 23 Grade 5 44 15 16 5 5 3 0 23 Grade 6 43 15 15 4 9 0 0 30 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K - 6 TOTALS 374 128 136 40 56 11 3 26 SCHOOL TOTALS 439 147 156 55 65 12 4 27 ~o?.\u0026gt; l~O I{,, DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER l, 1999 PAGE 7 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 Oak Grove Jr/Sr High LEA: 6003126 Grade Span: 7 - 12 Grade 7 ?'J\\ 153 57 48 Grade 27 19 2 0 30 8 169 59 62 23 23 2 0 27 Grade 9 199 81 64 21 28 2 3 25 Grade 10 fi? 184 69 65 26 22 1 1 26 Grade 11 99 39 36 10 13 1 0 23 Grade 12 112 42 47 13 10 0 0 21 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 916 347 (,?\u0026lt;] 322 120~ 115 8 /.:\n)..... 4 26 31 Robinson Elementary LEA: 6003110 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 50 23 20 4 3 0 0 14 Grade 1 45 26 10 6 3 0 0 20 Grade 2 57 25 22 2 7 1 0 16 Grade 3 52 25 17 2 7 0 1 17 Grade 4 66 29 19 7 10 l 0 26 Grade 5 56 27 19 4 4 0 2 14 Grade 6 55 24 16 8 7 0 0 27 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 381 179 123 33 7/ 41 2 5\nJC-Y 3 19 32 Robinson Sr. High LEA: 6003127 Grade Span: 10 - 12 Grade 10 175 74 44 32 24 0 1 32 Grade 11 130 44 51 21 13 1 0 26 Grade 12 129 44 48 24 13 0 0 29 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 434 162 143 77 50 1 1 29 30~ 1~7 a- DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 8 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 Scott Elementary School LEA: 6003111 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 27 9 Grade 1 12 1 5 0 0 22 20 6 7 4 3 0 0 35 Grade 2 24 6 9 5 4 0 0 38 Grade 3 21 7 5 5 4 0 0 43 Grade 4 10 5 1 3 1 0 0 40 Grade 5 25 10 8 6 1 0 0 28 Grade 6 19 7 5 6 1 0 0 37 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 146 so 97 47 30 -i} 19 0 0 34 35 Alpha Academy LEA: NOT ASSIGNED Grade Span: 7 - 12 Grade 7 f? 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 33 Grade 8 10 4 1 3 1 0 1 40 Grade 9 42 13 6 12 9 1 1 so Grade 10 40 20 8 6 4 1 1 25 Grade 11 j~ 10 3 2 1 3 1 0 40 Grade 12 9 3 3 2 1 0 0 33 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 114 45 20 25 18 3 ~ 3 38 -V\ni 36 Northwood Jr High LEA: 6003140 Grade Span: 7 - 9 Grade 7 259 96 82 41 34 3 3 29 Grade 8 274 120 96 22 25 6 5 17 Grade 9 268 105 77 36 38 6 6 28 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 801 321 255 99 97 15 14 24 ~7(, IC,(.,. ,:\n)J DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 37 Sherwood Elememtary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL 52 57 59 65 58 54 76 0 421 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003112 16 22 16 23 21 21 21 22 21 16 17 15 33 24 0 0 145 ~ 143\n)..i BLACK BOYS GIRLS 5 7 9 8 7 9 9 13 10 11 17 5 16 3 0 0 73 ,~, 56 PAGE 9 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 6 1 1 23 0 1 30 1 0 27 0 0 34 0 0 36 0 0 41 0 0 25 0 0 0 2 1 2 31 39 Sylvan Hills Elementary LEA: 6003113 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 40 15 16 4 4 0 1 20 Grade 1 49 16 16 6 11 0 0 35 Grade 2 51 21 16 5 8 1 0 25 Grade 3 56 21 16 11 7 1 0 32 Grade 4 71 33 22 9 6 1 0 21 Grade 5 56 22 13 9 10 1 1 34 Grade 6 74 24 20 14 15 1 0 39 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 397 152 ~' / 119 58 I I/ 61 5 7 2 30 40 Sylvan Hills Jr High LEA: 6003122 Grade Span: 7 - 9 \\ Grade 7 284 100 74 46 56 5 3 36 Grade 8 302 98 96 48 57 1 2 35 Grade 9 278 101 99 29 45 4 0 27 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 864 299 ~ 269 123 158 10 5 33 ~ ~~, /5 DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 41 Sylvan Hills Sr High Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 PAGE 10 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS BLACK BOYS GIRLS OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER LEA: 6003128 Grade Span: 10 - 12 231 86 80 33 32 0 0 28 231 73 82 38 37 0 1 32 261 95 91 39 33 2 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 723 254 7253 110 102 2 2 ~a -'/ L. ~\n$~ .?,~ ... 42 Clinton Magnet School LEA: 6003095 Grade Span: PK - 6 Pre-Kindergarten 74 17 18 22 14 2 1 49 Kindergarten 107 25 26 27 24 3 2 48 Grade 1 103 22 23 25 30 2 1 53 Grade 2 91 22 23 18 24 3 1 46 Grade 3 92 24 17 22 29 0 0 55 Grade 4 106 26 16 33 27 4 0 57 Grade 5 84 13 14 24 28 3 2 62 Grade 6 71 24 12 16 16 1 2 45 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K - 6 TOTALS 654 156 131 165 178 16 8 52 SCHOOL TOTALS 728 173 3~-\n249 187 ~~ 192 18 ~7 9 52 45 Cato Elementary LEA: 6003129 Grade Span: K - 6 Kindergarten 70 29 23 6 7 3 2 19 Grade 1 63 23 25 6 7 0 2 21 Grade 2 75 30 18 12 12 2 1 32 Grade 3 67 23 27 7 9 1 0 24 Grade 4 60 23 20 7 10 0 0 28 Grade 5 72 22 23 14 13 0 0 38 Grade 6 73 25 27 8 11 1 1 26 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 480 175 ~'5 163 60 )~~ 69 7 6 27 (?\u0026gt; DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) 46 Pinewood Elementary Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Special Ed SCHOOL TOTALS PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL 84 79 87 83 83 76 0 492 WHITE BOYS GIRLS LEA: 6003130 30 17 33 18 34 27 27 17 24 24 20 25 0 0 168 128 ~'14 BLACK BOYS GIRLS 17 16 14 14 14 10 16 21 18 15 17 13 0 0 96 1\u0026amp;5 89 PAGE 11 OTHER BLACK BOYS GIRLS PER Grade Span: K - 5 3 1 39 0 0 35 0 2 28 1 1 45 2 0 40 0 1 39 0 0 0 6 5 38 ti 47 Mills University High LEA: 6003125 Grade Span: 10 - 12 Grade 10 226 81 46 so 43 5 1 41 Grade 11 231 77 60 47 44 3 0 39 Grade 12 190 60 48 34 46 1 1 42 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 647 218 ~ 154 131 .\n133 9 I/ 2 41 ~1 i\n48 Jacksonville Jr High LEA: 6003117 Grade Span: 8 - 9 Grade 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grade 8 367 113 105 65 84 0 0 41 Grade 9 385 124 122 78 55 4 2 35 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 752 237 / 227 143 139 4 2 38 ,\n/~j. ~~ (p DATE 10-25-1999 (14:56:18) PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT (BY SCHOOL) OCTOBER 1, 1999 GRADE TOTAL WHITE BOYS GIRLS PAGE 12 OTHER BLACK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BLACK BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS PER 49 North Pulaski High LEA: 6003136 Grade Span: 10 - 12 Grade 10 273 116 Grade 11 77 36 34 6 4 26 216 74 71 32 31 5 3 29 Grade 12 247 92 103 24 24 3 1 19 Special Ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL TOTALS 736 282 9?3-251 92 ,~I 89 14 8 25 5)-\n,., 50 Robinson Jr High LEA: 6003143 Grade Span: 7 - 9 Grade 7 151 68 49 13 21 0 0 23 Grade 8 142 43 61 20 17 0 1 25\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1350","title":"Proceedings: ''Pulaski County School District Motion for Unitary Status''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1999-09-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","School management and organization","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Pulaski County School District Motion for Unitary Status''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1350"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["220 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_71","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1999-09/1999-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/71"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant.\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED SEP 1  1999 om LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for August, 1999. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General --r\nti /_ /? TIMOTHY G. t\n__AUG1ER '#95019 Assistant Attorn~ neral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education EIVE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 1 19 q LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 ~~~ gry tb~ii\\fetm~!f9Q ~Y~!!?.I~ ~t qg!y ~j~:11~~\n!b\nIR G~fiji\niiifijij ihi I\nqqaljiijtf 5 f).1rjpifig fbtY $~/QQf~QpJ~tJ p~figgl ijgjtj$\\ffi~iitt. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the residenl District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 !-ilff1m~, 1~nfqmJi112n ~Y~1.,i~1ilf Wv@1I 1s.$$il\u0026amp;ijEoe~1Bm\nf~tjfqtJi a~1o~u:iAPi$..tt:p~fig1i@\\JmigmM C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 On July 31 , 1999, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY 98/99 were as follows: LRSD - $46,560,574 NLRSD - $26,187,899 PCSSD - $55,864,014 The allotments of State Equalization Funding calculated for FY 98/99 at July 31, 1999, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $46,560,574 NLRSD - $26,187,899 PCSSD - $55,864,014 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 @ig en tn~ IntrmtJ,en ivij/1i~!~11f~@ios ~,11i1gfi\n1\n1\n,i ~1\n1~~Jgrem $$!Om 4bJ$tJq pet@:11 a.mi:tstm$1'lrn\nE. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 IJ I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational C~arge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 lll\\1l11~1lfl1\\\\t!1III1l.llll~iiiRil!l1ll~1i1il:1i~ri1t~[III M~~rit g~i)t!!w: @mmift~~ !~ ieentnQ tni~ 1ntffiiijt10.ro$.t\u0026amp;~a Pt tn\u0026amp; itt ~tt~#ni\u0026amp; ijJnglgit~#Jn m~ 1mt.tiimgo#m.n B!?ni F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 i~~~ eg f~i 1,nt2rmi1!2r ijx~u~e,~i ~ti~ 5.R it~1ijf~ij ~JQqJy ?11 1g~ijtitleoo ~~IOQW$UPHftq PMP?:il\nadjustm~ot~\nG. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 Distributions for FY 98/99 at July 31 , 1999, totaled $9,144,784. Allotment calculated for FY 98/99 was $9,144,784 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Calcujate.clfo(FY ~91.oq, sub]e.ct to p~ripflic atjjs.Jmrits. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I.  Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Distributions for FY 98/99 at July 31, 1999 were: LRSD - $3,780,351 NLRSD- $1,941 ,173 PCSSD - $7\n391 ,306 The allotments calculated for FY 98/99 at July 31 , 1999, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $3,780,351 NLRSD- $1 ,941 ,173 PCSSD - $7,391 ,306 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, December of each year. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In September 1998, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 98/99 were submitted to the ADE by the Dist.ricts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 ~~r~~ 1!\n~:::to~ihn\nf ~i~~~~:tm1~~~~r~e1\n:11M~Wti~~l~i~iii~11!.llr.91 Coordinator is currentfy performing this functionii.\\st~ad of R$.g\\tialg Y:vJJs.od}~' ir,dicat~g lr}tt,elmplimentatiof} p.[ijh L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budge( (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 ~1llltllll~lili~,r~1,1~ll1ill1:li1llllii!f lllr\nl1l~ll~l\\1i ~\u0026amp;!\ni#!lhiffiilm?#it~l ii 4P!i 1ij~g\nfflg 1$)!9w\\Qg ti~a ij\n~H P~t~ t qr EM gijr~~\ni !limll\n1'!l~!~~fig:1_ ~AARQ t liji@!?ij!li . l$$St!H$1\\i\u0026amp;IiP~QQ M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98-99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 1998- 99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q . Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97 /98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Q!~f n9t12r lh ~~Ixc tg~~r torF :Y~ ~199 '.is S.@?~ Q\nmm~ w~i f6ij t6i~t~mPYiW ge.JJh\u0026lt;M.9 grj~fl8.Y!!3W Cqm.fu!ffgijff:5 ~/QQl V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. D,Js1r~~!8D iQ ~Y!'J99~for F'(~~/QQyv~ $2QQ[QQQ\n[bl W~$lb! fgf~i ~ffi94'1t c:tgJpJh~ QPMf citFX ~9fOQ. 8 I) II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION . A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 9 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A.  Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assur~ that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties.  Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. 12 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. 8. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 13 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DE:SEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 14 I , I f IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT\"IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. 15 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Ct:\u0026gt;ntinued) E.  Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to b~ impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. ~D ~H!Y g\n1~~g\niijij semmli!~~ m~t~i !b~ 1\nlb~ 88ffiffi/~(~~ ~l~ DB~ rieei ~tl.!~-I 9tf~9Hl~!l9D m~tm~x 9.~tt~b!!XlP99tmtiP9!9!filR~B~ P~~~tt~~!!An\nand at$ ${ill W.:iiJibQJOt $ resp6ii$ijJrqffi tlje ttit~H-~ tlf$lfit$ iii RUla$kf.Qqijrjty( 16 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court-on  March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 17 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tenfative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 18 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias . review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 19 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quart3rly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 20 /\nV. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management T col, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Educati9n will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection . . In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 21 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, ar:id scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 22 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 99~49?~!~~ 1~g\nf6,g ~~~Q~ !~!~ ?~4112f ~Y~l!BQ fiy/~y\nii~I~ f1Mill ibP ii i!~SPYY~tim1m~rxf inti: ~@ yj!! ~i 6!1fi~2 :19~1 Wi ti~ Q~se9.f~ij!flt!MNftiQ ~t!g~~~!}f~QS~fll~g}pQ!g P~t~~9Yl9 sut:imltt.Jbg ~913@ ttJ6itte\\ii~w $.: ~pprgx~1 ij$.!2#Bt:i~ ti.l\u0026amp;h wt~ nn~Jit.~~t 23 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by Dis'trict, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 24 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules_ outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 25 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for thcJ peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools . NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From Marcti to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97 /98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 26 /, / VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assisfance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 27 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C.  Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating D. compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 28 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center.and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children . On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. 29 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources tor technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan in service training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. 30 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts, In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in  evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 31 VI. REM ED IA TION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for I I Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. , On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP) . In \nygfii 1.~ j~~~~ er01~~i!20t!!~ixi!2em~r1:en Yfix~ 12 tner~iii ~fq~ini 1ii:!lrJ1fi ilti1ild1t!~ff 11s1t11 ~~h~o1\\$.Jff! :lV~topm~mt?tHv.itig$\nf tlhg 5..HWn~a 32 VII. TEST VALIDATION A. B. Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or 9ther monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date March, 1995 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 On March 29, 1995, letters were sent to four national experts about conducting a test bias validation of the Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition, Form K (SAT-8). Dr. Paul Williams, Deputy Director of Educational Testing Service (ETS), contacted the ADE in April of 1995 concerning the proposal for validating the SAT-8 test. The ADE requested that Dr. Williams conduct a validity study of test items used in the SAT-8. Dr. Williams submitted a final proposal for his services. The ADE Bias Review Test Committee met Friday, July 7, 1995, and approved Dr. William's contract proposal. The final contract was forwarded to Dr. Williams for his signature. The contract was signed in August 1995, thereby, completing this goal. By April 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representatives of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 Complete. ADE established a Bias Review Committee in April 1994. In accordance with the Implementation Plan, representatives from the Districts and the parties were invited to attend and participate in this and all meetings of the Bias Review Committee. C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. 1. Projected Ending Date March 1995 and ongoing 33 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, t~e ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 Dr. Paul Williams met with the staff of the Psychological Corporation to review their methods and procedures. In August 1995, he met with the staff at Georgia State University to review the statistical methods that would be used in the analysis. Dr. Williams reported difficulty with the bias-review study in receiving the names of the bias panel and the complete SAT-8 data set from the Psychological Corporation. Dr. Williams submitted an invoice totaling $8,961 for Task I activities of the SAT-8 validity study for partial fulfillment of the test validation study. On December 6, 1995, a contract extension for Dr. Williams was reviewed by the Legislative Council. In January 1996, he indicated that he was in the final stages of the test validation, and the ADE was presented a draft report in March 1996. In May 1996, Dr. Williams stated that the wrong data sets were sent to him by the Psychological Corporation resulting in Task 3 having to be redone. A new draft of the final report was received by the ADE in July 1996. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team for their review. On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that they had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The ADE Director indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the ADE Director, the ADE Assistant Director for Technical Services, and the ADE Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. Test validation procedures by the expert have been completed. A recommendation was drafted proposing the use of the SA T-8 by the ADE as the validated test for monitoring. The ADE is presently working to arrange a meeting with the Administration of the LRSD to discuss the test validation study. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow the ADE to move forward in this matter. 34 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. In February 1998, ADE staff met with senior staff members to discuss the test validation and appropriate test scores for consideration by the LRSD. The  ADE Director met with the Superintendent of the LRSD to discuss test validation issues. In June 1998, the ADE Director directed the Assistant Director for Accountability to recommend staff to discuss how the ADE would measure LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. Plans were made to meet with the staff Tuesday, June 30, 1998. The Test Validation Committee met on June 30, 1998, and discussed the following: 1. The appropriateness of the use of scaled scores on the SAT-8 test as the metric for assessing LRSD compliance with the loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement\nand 2. The need for an independent analysis of LRSD students' test scores to determine compliance or noncompliance with loan forgiveness standard, and who would bear the cost of such an independent analysis. The Test Validation Committee met on September 10, 1998, to review recent correspondence from LRSD and to further discuss issues related to the loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement. A follow-up administrative meeting was held on October 13, 1998, to discuss issues related to the test validation process. Participants included Tim Gauger, Assistant Attorney General, Dr. Charity Smith, Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Frank Anthony, Assistant Director for Accountability. A meeting was scheduled with Dr. Les Carnine, LRSD Superintendent and Mr. Ray Simon, ADE Director, regarding Test Validation and loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement on May 12, 1999. 35 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) On June 14, 1999, the State Board of Education was briefed on the status of LRSD's refusal to make principal and interest payments into escrow as required by the loan provisions of the Settlement Agreement and related documents. The Board requested that a draft motion to enforce the Settlement Agreement be prepared and submitted to the Board for review and discussion at the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting. On July 12, 1999, the State Board of Education authorized the filing of a motion to compel LRSD to make interest and principal payments into escrow pursuant to the loan provisions of the Settlement Agreement. 3 6 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING A. Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. 8 . Develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. Implement in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In April 1995, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee were provided an overview of the Scott Alternative Learning Center's operation and met with students and staff. In May 1995, the Districts were in the process of self-assessment and planning for fall staff development. 37 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs develo\"ped and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The Districts worked on staff development to be incorporated into their fall 95/96 preschool calendars. The uniqueness of each district's needs and their schools was considered in the planning by utilizing the results of needs assessment instruments. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 13, 1995 to plan for an ADE administered Classroom Management grant. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 19, 1995 to finalize the Classroom Management grant proposal. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 24, 1995 to discuss program and staff development evaluation models that might be available to the Districts. On November 15, 1995, the ADE met with an ODM representative to discuss the progress the ADE had made in attaining the objectives outlined in the Implementation Plan with regard to inservice training. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 21 , 1995 to discuss upcoming training events and various NLR programs that focus on non-academic needs. A new program consisting of placing a graduate student of social work, a field supervisor, and a OHS worker in the district at no cost to the district was discussed. Additionally, NLR provided an overview of their program for credit deficient students. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 19, 1995 to discuss information dealing with ways to broaden the perspective of multicultural education. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 17, 1996 to discuss proposed changes in the standards regarding media centers and NLRSD's staff development strategic planning committee. The committee reviewed a video on diversity produced by the Arkansas Elementary Principals Association. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 21 , 1996 to discuss the implications of budget cuts on staff development programs and PCSSD's request for unitary status for their staff development program. They also discussed the need for computer literacy, technology training, and acquisition of hardware and software by the Districts. 38 IJ VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued)  2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 27, 1996 to discuss available resources concerning sexual harassment. ADE regulations in relation to staff members attending professional association conferences as well as the district staff development and potential sites for training seminars were also discussed. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 30, 1996 to discuss the reconfiguring of Jacksonville Junior High, PCSSD professional development schedules, and APSCN on-line time lines. A tour of the Washington Magnet school was also conducted. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee received a demonstration of UALR's Baum Decision Support Center's capabilities regarding consensus and planning on May 29, 1996. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee did not meet during September, October, and November 1996 because of scheduling conflicts and the extended medical leave of the ADE liaison. On December 18, 1996, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met to discuss the linkage between the Implementation Plan, staff development, and student achievement. On January 21, 1997, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met and discussed sharing middle school strategies and the Districts' training catalogs. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 25, 1997 to discuss their current staff development programs and an overview of the relationship of their current programs with their desegregation plans. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 26, 1997 to observe the Great Expectations Program. The principal and mentor teachers provided information on the components and philosophy of the program, and students demonstrated selected components. The PCSSD may adopt the program for selected schools in their district. The committee was provided with an update of pertinent information on resources available to the Districts. The committee decided that the ADE liaison to the committee would gather documentation of completed staff development directly from the Districts, instead of the Districts providing this information at the committee meetings. 39 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service. training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) New information on teacher licensure and rules and regulations was shared with the Tri-District Staff Development Committee at their April 1997 meeting. A report was presented to the committee on information from the Arkansas Council for Social Studies about an October 1997 meeting on integrated curriculum. The Districts will provide principal retreats this summer as a part of their staff development. The PCSSD will sponsor a renowned speaker on strategies to serve at risk youth in August 1997 in which the committee is invited to attend. The LRSD shared survey results from a pilot administration to four teachers in each district. The survey found the sample to be strong in content but lacking in context and process. Plans to address these needs will be developed. In another survey to certified and non-certified LRSD staff, stress management was the major concern. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on May 14, 1997 to participate in a teleconference with the five 1996 awardees of the National Awards Program for Model for Professional Development. The PCSSD shared their summer and fall staff development catalog with the members. The committee will reconvene in the fall of the 97 /98 school year. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee is scheduled to meet on September 30, 1997 to discuss collaborative actions for FY 97/98. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 30, 1997 to discuss their staff development for the 1997 /1998 school year. The PCSSD had a pre-school in-service for the faculty, and the LRSD conducted a Principals Academy with an expert on the math and science initiative which lasted several days. The NLRSD is providing staff development by satellite. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 28, 1997. The LRSD and NLRSD shared some of their staff development course offerings with the committee, and the PCSSD discussed ways of optimizing opportunities for staff development with specific emphasis on the junior high school conflict resolution training. In November 1997, the Lead Planner provided technical assistance to Central High School staff regarding data disaggregation, test score analysis and ways to improve student achievement. 40 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 25, 1997 to discuss the Standards for Staff Development. The LRSD will begin providing technology training to their employees in January by utilizing business teachers. Additionally, they discussed a collaborative venture of the Districts involving a workshop from Chicago on a program called \"Great Expectations.\" The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 16, 1997 to discuss technology plans, strategies for obtaining information currently being provided to the education cooperatives, scheduling of Arkansas history, and the development of a comprehensive list of locations available for staff development. Members agreed -to bring information on available locations to the January meeting and have set a tentative completion date for the project of May 1998. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 27, 1998 to share information for developing a comprehensive list of locations available for staff development. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 24, 1998 to work on the development of the list of locations available for staff development. The committee also discussed the meeting on student achievement sponsored by the ADE for the Districts, principals' staff development in the Districts and emphasis on improving achievement as reflected on the SA T-9. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 19, 1998 to discuss the math and science grant received by the LRSD, the Districts' inservice calendars for August, TESA and Student-Team Learning trainers, and team building for staff. The ADE Deputy Director is scheduled to discuss ways the committee can strengthen their relationship with the regional cooperatives at their May meeting. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 27, 1998 to discuss their proposal for involvement with the regional cooperatives. The ADE Deputy Director is scheduled to discuss committee's concerns regarding their relationship with the regional cooperatives at their next meeting. 41 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met Thursday, May 21, 1998, in the Instructional Resources Center at Little Rock School District. Dr. Woodrow Cummins, ADE Deputy Director, joined the group to discuss ways to develop a closer connection with the Education Service Cooperatives. He also discussed other issues concerning Tri-District Staff Development. Tentative plans were made to meet with the Teacher Center Coordinators at their next regular meeting. The next Central Office meeting will be at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 29, 1998, in the PCSSD. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee will attend the Educational Cooperative Teacher Center Coordinators' meeting September 1, 1998, in the ADE auditorium. The next regular meeting of the committee is tentatively set for 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 29, 1998, in the PCSSD Central Office. The Tri-County Staff Development Committee met Monday, August 24, 1998, at PCSSD central office with four members present: Marion Woods, LRSD\nDoug Ask and Mary McClendon, PCSSD\nand Betty Gale Davis, ADE. Topics of discussion included the September 1 meeting scheduled with the regional cooperatives' teacher center coordinators\nthe staff development task force on which Marion Woods is serving\nthe property tax issue\nand various mathematics and reading programs being used in the districts. The committee met Tuesday, September 1, 1998, with the Teacher Center Coordinators, at which time Dr. Woody Cummins presented. Six Tri-District Staff Development Committee members were present: Marion Woods, LRSD\nDoug Ask and Mary McClendon, PCSSD\nDana Chadwick and Estelle Crawford, NLRSD\nBetty Gale Davis, ADE. The next committee meeting will be 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 24, 1998, at the Little Rock District Instructional Resources Center. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met Thursday, September 24, 1998, at the Instructional Resources Center, Little Rock, with five present: Marion Woods and Dr. Bonnie Lesley, LRSD\nDoug Ask, PCSSD\nDana Chadwick, NLRSD\nand Dr. Betty Gale Davis, ADE. Topics of discussion included the meeting with the regional cooperatives' teacher center coordinators\nthe staff development task force on which Marion Woods is serving and the NSCI training\ntraining provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)\ntraining provided by Casio\nand the proposal of a Principals Academy. 42 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) . D. Evaluatein-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) Doug Ask will serve as representative to the October 6, 1998 meeting of the Teacher Center Coordinators. He will submit to Donna Harris, president of the group, a request for one other member of the Tri-County Committee (Dana Chadwick) to attend the meeting. Representatives for future meetings (second Tuesday of each month) will be: Marion Woods, November\nMary McClendon, December\nDana Chadwick, January. The next committee meeting will be 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, October 13, 1998, at the North Little Rock School District Central Office. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on Tuesday, October 13, 1998, in the NLRSD Administration Building. Doug Ask represented the committee at the Teacher Center Coordinators' meeting in Fayetteville, October 6. He shared with the Tri-District Committee information regarding the upcoming NSCI/Smart Start Training. James Smith spoke with the group about Amendment 4. Members of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee also met with the Teacher Center Coordinators, Wednesday, October 28. Doug Ask, Marion Woods, and Esther Crawford were trained as facilitators, October 29, for the initial Smart Start Summit to be held November 9-12, 1998. Marion Woods will represent the committee at the next regular Teacher Center Coordinators' meeting, Tuesday, November 3, 10:00 a.m. at the ADE. The next Tri-District Committee meeting will be at 9:00 a.m., November 10, in the PCSSD Administration Building. Members of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met several times with the Teacher Center Coordinators in preparation for the Smart Start Summit. During the Smart Start Summit, they served as facilitators. The meeting planned for November 10 was postponed due to the conflict with the Summit. Doug Ask, Marion Woods, and Esther Crawford met with the Teacher Center Coordinators on Tuesday, December 1, 1998, for the regular monthly meeting. Principal topics discussed were the Smart Start Initiative and Principals' Institute. The next meeting of the Teacher Center Coordinators is scheduled for January 6, 1999, 9:00 a.m., in the ADE Auditorium. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee will meet at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at the Little Rock School District Instructional Resources Center. 43 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) Doug Ask, PCSSD\nMarion Woods, LRSD\nand Esther Crawford, NLRSD, met with the Teacher Center Coordinators on Tuesday, December 1, 1998, for the regular monthly meeting. Principal topics discussed wecre the Smart Start Initiative and Principals' Institute. The Teacher Center Coordinators held their monthly meeting on January 6, 1999, 9:00 a.m., in the ADE Auditorium, with Doug Ask, Marion Woods, and Esther Crawford in attendance .. At the January meeting, the primary focus was on the Smart Start Initiative. Dates for the future committee meetings have been tentatively scheduled to coincide with meetings with the Teacher Center Coordinators. Due to the Tri-District Committee's involvement with the Smart Start Initiative, no formal meeting of the committee was held in January. Members of the TriDistrict Staff Development Committee met with Teacher Center Coordinators, January 6 and 25, 1999, preparing for and facilitating Smart Start activities. Dates for future meetings have been tentatively scheduled to coincide with meetings of Teacher Center Coordinators. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met Wednesday, February 17, 1999, at the Best Western lnntowne with four members in attendance. Most of the discussion centered on Smart Start and Character Centered Teaching. A March meeting date was not determined. Members of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met with the Teacher Center Coordinators at their regular monthly meeting, April 6, 1999, at the ADE. Much of the meeting centered on the Smart Start Initiative and the Getting Smarter Summer Conference to be held in Hot Springs, July 28- 31 , 1999. The next meeting of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee will be May 11, 1999, at the Northeast Arkansas Educational Cooperative, Walnut Ridge. Members of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met with the Teacher Center Coordinators at their regular monthly meeting, Tuesday, May 11 , 1999, at the Northeast Arkansas Educational Cooperative, Walnut Ridge, with Mary McClendon, PCSSD, Marion Woods, LRSD, Esther Crawford, NLRSD, and Janinne Riggs, ADE, attending. Much of the meeting centered on the Smart Start Initiative. The next meeting was scheduled as a retreat, June 7-9, 1999, at Hot Springs. Members of the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met with the Teacher Center Coordinators for their annual retreat, June 7-9, 1999, at Hot Springs. The next regular meeting will be in September, the date and place to be announced later. Summer activities will include the Getting Smarter Conference. 44 I\n( VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) tyfimber. pf th~ -r:i,:01strict.Staff Developmentbrnmitt~e !-net#uring the  Gettin~ ml3ctirtPrif~rence\n ~u1y2a'.'-s ~\nIt9~~} ~(~gtspHggs/ fn roltao.er~\\!99 with the treach~r C~pfor Coordinators, those parliclpatirig in theconfereric~ ijs facilitators 1NeregDoug Ask, PCSSD\nEsther Cr~qrd, NLRSQ\nand. Marion Woods, LRSD, .The next regulafme~ting v,,illt,?~jfi Septembef,.th~ 9atejind plf)c\neJp p~ ~11!19i.Jn~~d later. rr\nargedJ:i~cH/~n\u0026amp; +~st. ror stQden($u~ssi ? W9fKP9P ~im~p at impr:oy,ryg ifitefpr~!~~ioci f m::,s! ~~ta ~fl~ ~pply!hg t~~t. ~nW!~~ge toward more eff~ctiy~ lesson pla~pir'ig/ \\\\.ias adaptedfofpresentatidh iii cobJQnction With tli~ Multicultural lnstit.ute. Members of. the Standards Assurance Unit (Dee Qox, Betty Gale Davis, Bop' Maddox, and Lonzo Gatlin) presented an all-day workshop (Target, Teach., and Test fqr Student Success) for Pulaski County Special School pistric:tJri connection with the Multicultural Institute, July 27,1999. 45 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS A. . Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 1. Projected Ending Dates (See dates on individual key activities) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 A staff member of the ADE's certification department attended all of the college career days in FY 94/95 in Arkansas and one out-of-state. In FY 95/96, ADE certification staff members attended career and job fairs at the following colleges and universities: Philander Smith College\nUAM\nHSU\nATU\nUCA\nASU\nUA-Pine Bluff\nUA-Fayetteville\nHarding University\nSAU\nand Jackson State. ADE certification staff met with representatives from the Districts to ensure they were aware that ADE personnel were available to provide assistance in recruitment and certification of minority teacher candidates. A job fair was conducted at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff on December 4, 1996. The Districts were advised of the ADE's availability for providing assistance in recruitment and certification. In February 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Henderson State University, Arkansas Tech University, and University of Central Arkansas to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Harding University, UA-Fayetteville, UA-Pine Bluff, and ASU in April 1997 to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. From April 16, 1997 through May 6, 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Philander Smith College and SAU to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. Additionally, ADE staff attended an out-ofstate teacher job fair at Jackson State University at Jackson, Mississippi. Recruitment activities were suspended for the summer, but they will resume in the later part of September for FY 97/98. On September 25, 1997, the ADE's Professional Licensure Supervisor attended a career day job fair at Philander Smith College to provide support to the Districts in recruiting teachers. 46 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) A. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) On November 6, 1997, the Professional Licensure Supervisor attended a career day job fair at the University of the Ozarks in order to facilitate the Districts' recruitment efforts. Recruitment activities will resume in February 1998. Representatives of the ADE's Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at Arkansas Technical University, UCA, ASU and the University of Memphis fron:i February 26, 1998 through March 12, 1998. A representative from the ADE's Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at UA-Fayetteville and Harding University on March 30, 1998 and April 2, 1998, respectively. Representatives from the ADE's Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at Philander Smith College, SAU and North East Louisiana in April 1998. The staff members of Professional Licensure have scheduled college and university job fairs as they become aware of them. They have scheduled ATU, UCA, ASU, Harding, and UA-Fayetteville. The Professional Licensure staff assisted NLRSD in getting the spring minority graduate list from all college and university teacher education programs. The Licensure unit scheduled staff to attend job fairs coming up this spring. Representatives for the Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at ATU, UCA, and ASU from February 25, 1999 through March 9, 1999. Representatives for the Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at Harding, UA-Fayetteville, and UAM from March 25, 1999 through April 7, 1999. Representatives for the Professional Licensure Unit attended job fairs at Philander Smith, April 13, 1999 and Grambling University, April 15, 1999. B. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of each year, Districts will supply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subject area. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 47 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) B. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of.each year, Districts will supply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subject area. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 Letters were sent in May, August, and December 1995 to the Districts requesting information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject areas. In May and November 1996, the Human Resources offices of the Districts were requested to provide information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject area. The ADE sent follow-up letters requesting information from the Districts regarding teacher shortages in February 1997. The NLRSD and the PCSSD indicated that they expect teacher shortages in the areas of Special Education, Mathematics, the Sciences, Foreign Language, English as a Second Language and Gifted and Talented Education. On May 20, 1997, information was requested from the Districts regarding teacher shortages. Follow-up letters were sent in July 1997. On November 5, 1998, letters were sent to the three schools in Pulaski County requesting a list of foreseeable teacher shortages. In May 1999, requests were made to the Pulaski County Schools for a list of teacher openings and grade levels. In June 1999, the Professional Licensure Unit received a list of teacher shortage areas and openings for Pulaski County Schools. C. Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request information from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minority-teacher graduates. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 In May and December 1995, letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas requesting information on minority teacher graduates. Letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas in May and November 1996 requesting information on minority teacher graduates. 48 -  IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACMERS (Continued) C. D. Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request information from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minority-teacher graduates. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) In May and December 1997, letters were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs requesting minority teacher graduate information. On May 14, 1998, letters were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs requesting minority teacher graduate information. On August 1, 1998, the ADE Office of Professional Licensure sent advance notice to all Deans/Certifying Officials regarding the change in format for complete minority teacher candidate information. On November 5, 1998, letters were sent to Deans and Certifying Officials requesting a list of their fall minority teacher education graduates which will be sent to the three Pulaski County Schools. In May 1999, requests were made to all colleges and universities for their spring minority graduates for 1999. In June 1999, the ADE Office of Professional Licensure received minority graduate reports from colleges and universities. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In June 1995 and January 1996, ADE sent the information received from Arkansas colleges and universities on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. In July 1996 and January 1997, ADE sent the information received from Deans and Certifying Officers on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. On February 3, 1997, a list of minority teacher graduates from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville was forwarded to the Districts as an addendum to the list of graduates compiled on January 16, 1997. 49 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) D. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleg~s and universities provide t.he Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The ADE provided the Districts with the Minority Teacher Graduate Report compiled from the minority teacher graduate informatiorf received from Arkansas colleges and universities in July 1997 and January 1998. The 1998 Fall Minority Teacher Graduate Report from colleges and universities have been forwarded to the three Pulaski County School District. Information from the three Pulaski County School Districts regarding vacant teaching positions are being forwarded to the colleges and universities. In July 1999, the minority graduate reports from the colleges and universities were mailed to all Pulaski County Schools. Job openings for Pulaski County Schools were mailed to all colleges and universities. E. Each November, ADE will request information from the Districts on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance, including an assessment of the minority teacher candidates' database. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 On November 30, 1994, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of the ADE's minority recruitment assistance. Follow-up letters were sent on March 17, 1995 since no responses had been received. Additional follow-up letters were sent to the Districts in August 1995 because the ADE had received no responses from the Districts. A planning and evaluation meeting was scheduled on January 11, 1996 with representatives from the Districts. The Districts did not attend the meeting. In February 1997, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance. The NLRSD and the PCSSD submitted favorable evaluations concerning the effectiveness of the ADE's recruitment assistance efforts. The ADE did not received any information from the LRSD regarding this matter. 50 . ,) X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACl-jER CANDIDATES A. Assist ADHE in identifying, analyzing, addressing and eliminating racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. B. Representatives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together, review ADHE's available data to identify racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. C. Using its knowledge about public schools, teacher education and certification, and through a collaborative effort with the Districts, ADE will analyze racial disparities in ADHE scholarship allocations. ADE will report its findings, conclusions, and recommendations about racial disparities in allocating scholarships to ADHE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 In April 1995, ADE met with representatives of ADHE concerning identification and analysis of possible disparities in scholarship allocations. 51 ,e X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial  disparities in allocation of scholarships. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In June 1995, a collaborative effort was made between the ADE and ADHE to enhance the rate at which minorities were applying for the 1995 teacher scholarships with special emphasis on the areas of science, math, and foreign language through a direct mail program. In July 1995, representatives from the ADE and the Districts met to review the scholarship applications. The Implementation Committee on Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates discussed ways to increase minority awareness of the scholarships available for minority teacher applicants. The committee agreed to meet quarterly to identify, analyze, and address eliminating racial disparities in scholarships. The committee met in December 1995 to discuss the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year. The committee meets on a continuous basis to review scholarship distributions and discuss ways of improving the pool of applicants for minority teacher scholarships as detailed further in Section X. E. of this report. E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 During the May 1995 Legislative session, Acts 188, 189 and 259 regarding scholarships were passed. A meeting to monitor and analyze the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year was held on December 15, 1995. The committee met on June 7, 1996 to review the scholarship applications for minority teacher candidates for the 96/97 school year. Representatives from the ADHE stated that the ADHE expected to have the resources to fund: 56 scholarships under the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n100 scholarships under the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 13 scholarships under the Minority Masters Fellows Program. The committee also discussed ways of increasing the scholarship applicant pools, and a recommendation was made to make scholarships available to part-time students. 52 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation -of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In September 1996, a proposal was submitted to the Assistant to the Director for Legislative Services recommending the Legislature offer minority teacher scholarships to part-time students. The committee met on October 23, 1996 to review the scholarships awarded for the 96/97 school year. The following scholarships were funded: 60 scholarships totaling $144,266 for the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n20 scholarships totaling $107,500 for the Minority Masters Fellows . Program\n109 scholarships totaling $505,093 for the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 258 students in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Grant Program received scholarships totaling $374,000. In March 1997, information on minority teacher scholarships and how to apply was provided to the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities. The Districts were informed of ADHE's scholarship promotional efforts and legislative updates. The next meeting of the committee will be in September 1997. On April 8, 1997, notifications were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities on the Minority Teacher Scholars Program reminding them that the deadline for receiving applications was June 1, 1997. This information was also provided to the Districts. The Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee will meet on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. The Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee met on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. The ADHE Assistant Coordinator for Student Financial Aid provided a comprehensive presentation on scholarships awarded for the 97/98 school year There were 235 scholarships awarded in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Scholarship program totaling $344,988. The Emergency Secondary Education Loan program awarded 52 scholarships for a total of $119,370. There were 83 scholarships for $403,520 awarded in the Minority Teachers Scholars program. The Minority Masters Fellows program awarded 20 scholarships for a total of $73,750. The ADHE representative indicated that during the 1997 regular legislative session legislation was passed to allow hispanics and asians to participate in the minority scholarship programs. It was stated that the average GPA for minority teacher scholarship recipients had increased to 3.13, and that the dollars awarded in the Minority Masters Fellows program were down from last year because most of the recipients were part-time students. 53 - X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The committee discussed numerous avenues that might be utilized to inform minority applicants of scholarships available. Communication with the faculty of Arkansas colleges and universities regarding the availability of scholarships was discussed as a way of informing teaching students of possible resources available to them. The next quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee will be February 19, 1998. The quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee scheduled for February was canceled since only the NLRSD and an ADE representative were present at the scheduled meeting place. The meeting has not been rescheduled at this time. The Minority Teacher Scholarship meeting was rescheduled for March 26, 1998. The Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee met on March 26, 1998. The committee was updated on the requirements and application packets were distributed for the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program (ESELP), Minority Teacher Scholars Program (MTSP), and Minority Masters Fellows Program (MMFP). The deadline for applications was April 1, 1998 for the ESE LP and June 1, 1998 for the MTSP and MMFP. The scholarships will be awarded in July 1998. A committee member requested that ADHE send scholarship applications to the schools as well as the district offices to ensure that their teachers and students were apprised of the scholarships available. It was suggested that the colleges submit prospective graduate information for use by the Districts no later than April since the Districts begin the interview process of Spring graduates in May. The ADE Implementation Plan currently requires that the ADE request information on minority teacher graduates in May, and then it is distributed to the Districts in June or July. A representative from the ADE Teacher Licensure Unit was present at the meeting and stated that the ADE would try to accommodate the Districts with this request, but she cautioned that colleges and universities are reluctant to provide tentative graduate information. The next committee meeting is scheduled for July 30, 1998 at the NLRSD offices. 54 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINOR_ITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The Minority Teacher Scholarship Meeting was held July 30, 1998. Donna Elliot, ADE Program Support Manager was appointed to the Committee. She indicated that advance notification would be mailed to all University Deans/Certifying Officials regarding the change in format for more thorough minority teacher candidate information. A complete report will be forwarded and reported in the September PMT. Disparities in minority scholarship distributions were not evidenced in the draft report. Lillian Williams, Arkansas Department of Higher Education, submitted the following report on Minority Teacher Scholarships Distribution: 1998-99 PROGRAM STATISTICS PROGRAM NAME APPROPRIATION AWARDED #STUDENTS Freshman/Sophomore 250,000 250,000 Estimated 300+ ESEL 81 ,717 121,250 50 * Minority Teacher 450,000 445,000 89 ** Scholars Minority Masters Fellows 80,000 80,000 30 * Please note that only 81 ,717 was appropriated for the ESEL Scholarship, however, additional repayment funds were used to award an additional 39,533 totaling 121 ,250. ** 11 Students are pending passing the PPST. The report on Minority Teacher Scholarships Distribution was presented October 8, 1998, by the Education Lead Planner during the Break the Mold Workshop: Teacher Recruitment and Retention, sponsored by the Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation. The group was informed about the following: 1. Projected Teacher shortages in Mathematics, Special Education, and Foreign Language 2. Collaborative efforts of the ADE and the ADHE to recruit teachers by funding more than 450 scholarships for applicants interested in teaching annually 3. Reasons new teachers give for leaving the profession 4. The ratio of minority teachers to minority students. 55 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (CLntinued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\n. evaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) The Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee met on November 2, 1998 in the Pulaski County District Conference Room. The committee received (1) an update on the distribution of scholarships, (2) reviewed the scholarship information booklets, (3) approved the quarterly report of progress. The committee also identified, as a legislative issue, the need to allow part-time students access to scholarships. The next quarterly meeting is scheduled for February 2, 1999. A recommendation was received by the Committee on Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates regarding the Emergency Secondary Education Loan. The Committee recommended that the Arkansas State Legislature increase the minority teacher candidate pool by offering the Emergency Secondary Education Loan to part-time students. The Committee noted that a number of persons currently serving our education system as substitute teachers would take advantage of the assistance offered, if they could receive assistance for part-time student status. Many prospective minority teacher candidates, and candidates seeking advanced degrees are unable to serve our students and go to school on a full-time basis. The next quarterly meeting is scheduled for February 2, 1999. The next quarterly meeting was rescheduled for February 21 , 1999, to accommodate all participants. The quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee was held on February 21, 1999, in the Little Rock School District. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County, the ADHE and the ADE attended the meeting. A scholarship report update and scholarship applications and deadlines for the 1999 school year were provided. Information regarding the national focus on teacher shortages and recruitment were distributed. The committee discussed the status of the following bills related to teacher recruitment: SB31 , \"an act to make emergency secondary education loans available to students enrolled as a major in a program of study leading to teacher certification for foreign languages and special education .\" HB1466 \"state supported colleges and universities must report to Department of Education the name, address, and major of each minority student completing college requirements for licensure as school teacher.\" S8237 \"to make technical amendments to various sections of the Arkansas Code Annotated relative to public education.\" 56 IJ X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHE\nR CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 (Continued) S8261 \"to encourage teachers to participate in and complete NBPTS Certification by authorizing the Department of Education to pay full tuition and incentive bonuses.\" $8113 \"to amend A.C.A.  6-17-410 to clarify that the Department of Education will pay criminal record check fees for certain public education employees.\" The quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee was held on May 13, 1999 at the ADHE. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County, ADHE, and ADE attended the meeting. A scholarship report update and scholarship application deadline for the 1999 school year were provided. Information regarding the new rules and regulations for professional development that are to go out for public comment were distributed. The committee discussed the status and impact of the following Acts related to teacher recruitment: Act 905 (formerly HB1466)\nAct 391 (formerly SB237)\nAct 58 (formerly 8B261)\nAct 226 (formally 8B113). 9nl2~y@@J\n1~~~ngjijl~n YYiJliais) A.,IB~Q~~ R@B~~IDPl f ~iQb\nr ggyltmn\npffljff..q m~fllY.kidg f.pft n MJribfiJYlli~#.h~f $..hmr$.hf P P1$!f/.p~ntfii 57 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF A. . Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific objectives and time lines). 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31 , 1999 The Minority Recruitment Committee met on April 14, 1995. New committee members were assigned tasks and goals to increase the effectiveness of the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the Minority Recruitment Committee meeting on May 18, 1995, the committee was divided into four working sub-teams to update the annual plan. Each team focused on one of the four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan and monitored specific task completions. From June to October 1995, subcommittees met and worked on monitoring the progress of the ADE in accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Minority Recruitment Plan.  In September 1995, the ADE reached an agreement with the Arkansas Statewide Systemic Initiative (ASSI) for conducting an audit of the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee reviewed the recommendations and comments for updating the plan at the November 1995 meeting and reviewed the final draft at the December meeting. The ASSl's audit findings were presented to the committee on January 16, 1996. It was determined during the initial review that the files were incomplete to the extent that an accurate audit was not possible. The auditor met with the committee in March 1996 to review the additional documentation in the files. The auditor prepared the final report in April 1996 indicating that of the 89 actions contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan, 74 of the items had been completed, nine were in progress, and six had not been started. The audit stated that of the 22 items in Goal 1, 15 were completed, one was in progress, and six had not been started. Goal 2 contained 14 items, 13 of which were completed and one in progress. Goal 3 consisted of 30 items with 29 items completed and one in progress. Goal 4 consisted of 23 items with 17 items completed and six in progress. 58  XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and time lines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) The Minority Recruitment Committee met on June 6, 1996 to discuss updates and revisions addressed in the audit and the new racial/gender report on  Grades 21 and above. Since the completion of the audit, Goals 2.3.4 and 3.3.8 were completed, and a list of recommendations for retention activities was written. Also, a random sample of ADE employees was asked to fill out questionnaires, but only a limited number were returned. In August 1996, the Minority Recruitment Committee met and discussed the actions necessary to complete Goals 1 and 4 contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the September 1996 meeting, the committee was updated on the progress of all four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee heard an analysis of application and hiring practices and discussed the relevance of the data. Suggestions made by the State Board of Education regarding the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet were discussed at the February 1996 meeting of the Minority Recruitment Committee. Goal 1 of the Minority Recruitment Plan will be completed when the employee tracking sheet is finalized. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on March 14, 1997 and March 27, 1997 to discuss the draft Revised Minority Recruitment Plan and progress toward completing Goal 4. The committee passed a motion to omit Section 1.1 from Goal 1 of the draft revised plan. Additionally, the committee suggested that communication be made an integral part of each goal of the revised plan . The committee discussed the need for professional training programs, incentives for educational opportunities, and upward mobility for all staff within the ADE. In an effort to complete Goal 4, a representative from the ADE communication section presented development costs for media materials to the committee. Additionally, a representative from the ADE MIS section discussed the possibility of using the network to disseminate information to employees. It was suggested that the committee continue to receive assistance from MIS on the orientation video . 59 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and time lines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) In an effort to represent all sections within the ADE, the committee recommended that representatives from the ADE communication and MIS sections be added as members to the committee. Currently, neither section is represented on the committee. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on April 18, 1997 to discuss the need to revise the action steps for each of the committee's four goals. The committee decided to schedule a two-day retreat in an effort to review all goals and actions. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on May 19, 1997 to discuss the agenda for the annual retreat and revisions to the action plan emphasizing recruitment and retention at all grade levels. A two-day annual retreat was held on June 18-19, 1997 at the Teacher Retirement Building. The retreat facilitated the revision of the Minority Recruitment Committee's action plan for their four goals. Dr. Gary Chamberlain, UALR faculty member, served as the facilitator. The revised plan was distributed to the Minority Recruitment Committee at their July 18, 1997 meeting for final approval before it is submitted to the administrative team and the State Board of Education. The Minority Recruitment Committee meeting scheduled for September 12, 1997 was rescheduled for September 30, 1997 due to members scheduling conflicts. The meeting will be reported in the November PMT. The Minority Recruitment Committee met with the ADE Deputy Director in November 1997 to provide him with a copy of the revised plan and receive his input on the plan. The revised Minority Recruitment Committee (MRC) plan was approved at the December 1997 State Board of Education meeting. The MRC met in January 1998 to discuss the implementation of the revised MRC plan. Reports and documentation of progress in completing the components of each goal will be reported at the next meeting. 60 - XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) B. Monitor minority representation at alt levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 As of August 1995, the ADE had hired or transferred 38 employees in Grades 21 and above in the General Education Division. This group was composed of 11 black females, 5 black males, 16 white females, 4 white males, 1 other female, and 1 other male. The racial composition of the these employees was 52.6 percent non-minority and 47.4 percent minority. As of October 1995, there were 161 filled positions in the GED in Grades 21 and above. There were 27 minorities or 22.9 percent in Grades 21 and above. An analysis on Goal 1 regarding application and hiring practices was presented at the September 1996 meeting. Samples of graphs and tables for presenting the data were distributed at the meeting. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on December 13, 1996 to discuss the latest draft of the ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The committee recommended various format changes including the addition of a table of contents and an executive summary. The committee met on January 17, 1997 to continue the discussion on the draft ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum agreed with all but three of the committee's recommendations for the employee tracking sheet. He requested that the committee continue discussions on this matter. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on February 14, 1997 to discuss the status of the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The committee also discussed the lack of minority employees in some areas and the loss of several minority employees and the possibility of revising the new Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee received information on Arkansas pupil enrollment by race at their March 14, 1997 meeting. Arkansas enrollment figures for October 1, 1996 revealed that 73.7% of all students are white, 23.4% are black, 1.8% are hispanic, 0.7% are asian, and 0.4% are native american. To assess the effectiveness of the action steps for each goal, agenda items were developed for the committee's June retreat. The committee recommended that invitations be sent to Senator Beebe, Julie Cullen, Gene Wilhoit, and all State Board members. 61 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) B. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 (Continued) At the May 1997 Minority Recruitment Committee meeting, the committee discussed reviewing the most recent quarterly hiring and retention report and revisions to the action plan at the annual retreat. c Discussions during the July retreat focused on the current plan, the original purpose of the plan, and necessary changes with input provided by committee members and speakers from the Arkansas Department of Higher Education, Employment Securities, and the ADE. At the January 1998 MRC meeting, it was decided that the chair and secretary would prepare a report on minority representation within each unit and section and present it to the committee at the next meeting. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on June 11, 1998, to discuss new membership for the committee and plans for a retreat. The committee recommended a new design and composition of the committee to represent each of the seven sections of the Arkansas Department of Education and included Grade 20's and below. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on July, 16, 1998, to discuss implementation of new membership for the committee for FY98/99, and to update plans for the September retreat. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on August 11 , 1998 with Dr. Dave Westmoreland, Acting Chairperson. Members were notified that the dates for the September Retreat are September 10-11 , 1998 at the Teacher Retirement Building, Little Rock Arkansas. New Members were introduced and background materials regarding the purpose and progress of the MRC were distributed to new members. The sel\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1731","title":"Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to modify the settlement agreement as regards the magnet schools; District Court, districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, notice of filing, project management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1999-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Education--Economic aspects","Magnet schools","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to modify the settlement agreement as regards the magnet schools; District Court, districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' motion for pre-judgment interest; District Court, notice of filing, project management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1731"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["86 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  :\u003ei.J:\u003eHN W Wt{ I tit'! I IN TRE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT F:ASTF.RN T\u003eTSTRTr.T OF ARKAN.~4.~ WESTEP-1\\l DIVT..S!ON LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT WO. 1, et al., Defendants, * \"' * No. LR-C-82-866 OPTIONAL FORM 99 (7-90) r. UI MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, F\u003ex f  fax~ ;2 .., lr_ - I  ;;.-- . ,:; ?!-oL ofJ.'-----c~--'-~--=-='__,'--~~r'----,-....,,10C....:.,~~- N::iN 7:)40.,01-311-7386 5099-101 GENERAL SERVICES AOMlNIST~ATIO\"'( Y. .- \\THEP-'NE .NIGHT, et al., rntcrvenors. ORDER The Little Rock, North Little Rock; and Pulaski. County School Districts (\"Districts\") filed a motion requesting that t,.,is Coun order the State to distribute funds to the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative upon fon-...a.tion of the cooperative [docket no 3271]. The State responded [docket no_ 3275] and the Districts replied to the response [docket no. 3284]. Having carefully considered the matter, the Court denies the motion_ I_ In 1985, the Arkansas Legislature authorized the State Board of Education to establish a state funded system of multi-county educational cooperatives in Atkansas.1 The legislature intended the cooperatives to \"provide to school districts which choose to use them assistance in .. 1 1985 Atk. Acts 349 (codified at Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-1002). - - - - 3 2 95 ----- -- - ----- - SEP- 8-99 WED 10:12 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 02 - . meeting or exceeding accreditation standards and equalizing educational opportunities. \"2 In I 987, the Districts agreed to form the Pulaski County Educaticna} Cooperative,' and this Court approved the agreement.' Subsequently, the parties agreed to settle the State's liabiiity in this case and formulated a settlement agreement, which eliminated the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative. This Court, in an Order issued by the Honorable Henry Woods, transferred the funds previously eannarked for the cooperative to the budget of the Metropolitan Supervisor. See Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist., 716 F. Supp. 1162, .. .. . 1165 (E.D. Ark. 1989). In light of Judge Woods's Order, the parties agreed that the funds should be .. used to develop effective compensatory and remedial education programs designed to eliminate achievement disparities between black and white students and for other purposes intended to enhance desegregation.\"~ Accordingly, the parties amended Part ill.E of the settlement agreement as follows: State funding for the Pulaski County Education Service [Cooperative] has ceased and the funds were reallocated to the Metropolitan Supervisor by order of the Court. Should these funds no longer be required by the Metropolitan Supervisor, they will be used to assist the ADE [Arkansas Department of Education] in securing the services of trained consultants to develop effective compensatory, remedial education programs designed to eliminate achievement disparities between black and white students and for other purposes intended to enhance desegregation.' 2 Ark. Code. Ann. 6-13-1002. 3 Docket no. 737. 4 Docket no. 739. 5 Docket no. 1263, joint submission 2, ,i 9. 6 Docket no. 1263, joint submission 3, Part III, E. SEP- 8-99 WED 10:12 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO, 5013246576 P. 03 In 1990, the Eighth Circuit directed this Court to \"approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them\" and converted the Office of Metropolitan Supervisor to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"OD~f'). See Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Special Sch. Dist., 9.21 F.2d 1371, 1394 (8t1t Cir. 1990). In an Order clarifying the obligation of the State with respect to the ODM, this Court stated, \"While (the Office of Metropolitan Supervisor' s] name has been changed and the scope of its function narrowed to monitoring the parties' compliance with the settlement plans, the office ~ .. still exists . . . . Therefore, the State is obligated under the terms of the settlement agreement to continue funding the ODM.\"7 Before the regular session of the 1999 Arkansas General Assembly, the Districts requested that a Pulaski County Educational Cooperative be established. The General Assembly appropriated $328,618 for the cooperative but conditioned the disbursement of funds upon the \"entry of a final, nonappealable order\" in this case relieving the State \"of any further obligation to provide funds for the operation of the federal Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) or any successors to ODM. \"1 II. The Districts maintain this Court should invalidate the appropriation contingency and clear the way for the Districts' receipt of co-op funding. According to the Districts, the appropriation contingency conflicts with the parties' settlement agreement Wlth the State. Both the agreement and the legislation appear to be consistent in one important respect: 7 Docket 1442, page 4.  1999 Ark. Acts 1392  17. 3 SEP- 8-99 WED 10:12 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 04 - both intend that there will be no cooperative as long as the State is funding the ODM. The legislation reflects this intent unambiguously, while the agreement merely st~tes that funding for the cooperative has ceased and has been reallocated to the ODM. 9 Assuming (without deciding) that the Court bas subject matter jurisdiction to invalidate the contingency, the Court finds that there exist no grounds for such invalidation. The ODM continues to function and receive state funds . Until the State stops funding the\u003cODM by order of the Court, there is no need to address the issue of the alleged conflict between the legislation and the settlement agreement.  In conclusion, the Court finds that the Arkansas General Assembly's appropriation contingency regarding a Pulaski County Educational Cooperative does not obstruct the State's current obligations under the settlement agreement. That being the case, this Court must deny the the Districts' motion. m. THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that the Pulaski County School Districts' combined motion regarding the Pulaski County Educational Cooperative be DEN1ED l docket no. 3 271). ~t'lr\\be-r IT rs so ORDERED TillS __ DAY OF .A0Ct:ffl1', 1999 ~~tp: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 The agreement refers to the Metropolitan Supervisor, but, as noted above, the latter was reconstituted as the ODM. THIS DOCUMENT E~AED ON DOCKET SHEET IN :;QMP_wNC~ 'Nl~Le 58 ANO~P ON - 1/--. av - RECEIVED SEP 1 3 1999 OfflCE Or A TIORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS DESEGREGATION MONITORING September 10, 1999 M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. I 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mark Pryor Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Ann Brown 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School-District No. 1, et al USbC No. LR-C-82-866 Dear Ms. Brown and Gentlemen: Enclosed for your record is a copy of the Arkansas Department of Education's Response to the Little Rock School District's Motion to Modify the Settlement Agreement as regards the Magnet Schools that I have filed this date with the Clerk of the Court. TG/nc encl. 1 Respectfully, ~/:_ ~ - Tim ger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street Suite 200  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007  FAX (501) 682-8084 Internet Website http://www.ag.state.ar.us/_ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN .DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED SEP 1 3 1999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS ADE'S RESPONSE TO LRSD'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS REGARDS THE MAGNET SCHOOLS On July 9, 1999, the Arkansas Department of Education (\" ADE\") submitted its objection to the Magnet Review Committee's May 7, 1999 letter to the Court In that letter the MRC sought the Court's approval \"of a change in the grade structure and number of seats at the magnet schools for the 1999-2000 school year.\" In its July 9 submission ADE pointed out that the Settlement Agreement (paragraphs II.D. and ILE.) placed limits on the State's obligation to fund the magnet schools, and that while ADE did not object to the proposed changes in grade structure and enrollment in the magnets, ADE did object to the MRC' s proposal to the extent it assumed or implied that the State would be required to pay costs associated with magnet student enrollment in excess of the seating capacities set forth in the Settlement Agreement No other party filed objections to the MRC' s May 7 letter, nor did any other party file a timely response to ADE' s July 9 submission. On August 27, 1999, LRSD filed a \"Response to ADE and Motion to Modify Settlement Agreement\" In this pleading LRSD concedes, as it must, that the Settlement Agreement limits the State's funding obligations as regards the magnet schools. LRSD argues, though, that in addition to the proposed changes in grade structure and enrollment, \"the MRC determined that ADE and the [Districts] should share the cost increase in the same proportion each party now pays to support the Magnet Schools.\" From this premise, LRSD argues that ADE is bound by (or is estopped from objecting to) increases in the State's financial obligations necessitated by the restructuring and increases in enrollment In the alternative, LRSD argues that the Settlement Agreement should be modified to increase the State's financial responsibility for the magnet schools because of a \"significant change in circumstances,\" i.e., LRSD's decision to restructure its schools. LRSD' s arguments are without merit, and its motion to modify the Settlement Agreement must be denied. A. The State Is Not Bound By Or Estopped From Objecting To The MRC's Recommendations LRSD' s response and motion is premised on LRSD' s belief that the MRC voted unanimously not only to recommend changes in grade structure and seating capacities in the magnet schools, but also to recommend that the State and the Districts \"share the cost increase [necessitated by the restructuring and increases in enrollment] in the same proportion each party now pays to support the Magnet Schools.\" While the MRC did vote to recommend changes in grade structure and number of seats in the magnets, the - record is ambiguous, at best, on whether the MRC voted on the financial implications of 2 - those changes or made any recommendations at all concerning the relative financial burdens of the State and the Districts. This Court's June 18, 1999 order characterized the MRC's May 7 letter as a request \"for approval of a change in grade structure and number of seats at the magnet schools;\" the Court's order says nothing about the FY 2000 magnet school budget generally, or how costs would be allocated among the parties specifically. The MRC's May 7 letter states that on December 15, 1998 the Committee unanimously approved changes \"L11 the grade structure and number of seats\" in the magnets for the 1999-2000 school year. The letter's discussion of the budgetary impact of the proposed changes contains only estimates,1 and the MRC' s discussion of each party's projected \"share\" of the estimated FY 2000 budget is clearly based only upon the assumption that the State would continue to pay half the total costs of the magnet school budget But even if one accepted LRSD's characterization of what the MRC actually voted on and what it did not, LRSD has not cited any authority for the proposition that the recommendations of the MRC are binding on the parties, particularly when as here the MRC's recommendations purport to require one or more of the parties to assume obligations in contravention of the terms of the Settlement Agreement As has been the case with previous recommendations of the MRC, this Court entered an order giving all 1 The MRC's May 7, 1999 letter refers _.to its estimate as a \"projected calculation\" and acknowledges that a final 1999-2CXXJ magnet school budget would be submitted to the Court by June 1999. Given the MRCs uncertainty concerning the projected FY 2CXXJ budget on May 7, 1~, one can safely assume that the M~C harbored a similar uncertainty about the budgetary impact of the proposed changes in grade structure and attendance in the magnets on December 15, 1998, when the MRC voted on those proposed changes. 3 -- - - ' .. - parties notice of the MRC' s May 7 letter and set a deadline for the parties to file objections. If, as LRSD contends, the parties are bound by the MRC' s recommendations, why then would the Court submit those recommendations to the parties and provide an opportunity to object? The answer is simple: The MRC' s recommendations are precisely that - recommendations - which carry no force unless and until approved by the Court after giving the parties the opportunity to voice objections. B. LRSD's Decision To Restructure Its Schools As Part Of Its Revised Plan Does Not Tustify A Modification Of The Settlement Agreement Recognizing that the MRC has no authority to unilaterally modify the Settlement Agreement, LRSD implies that ADE should not be permitted to invoke the provisions of the Settlement Agreement because ADE did not object to LRSD' s Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (which makes reference to restructuring of LRSD's schools and the magnets). LRSD argues further, in the alternative, that the Settlement Agreement should be modified to the State's detriment because circumstances have changed so as to make such a modification equitable. Neither argument has merit LRSD's implication that the State should have objected to the Revised Plan in order to preserve its rights under paragraphs II.D. and II.E. of the Settlement Agreement borders on the frivolous. When the LRSD presented its Revised Plan for the Court's approval, it affirmatively represented to the Court and the other parties that its Revised Plan did not and would not alter or amend the Settlement Agreement in any way: 4 This Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") shall supercede and extinguish all prior agreements and orders . . . with the follawing exceptions: a. the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement  Agreement as revised on September 28, 1989 (\"Settlement Agreement'') .. Revised Plan, 1.1. Thus, at the time LRSD submitted its Revised Plan to the Court for approval, there was no reason for the State to believe or even suspect that the Revised Plan would change, alter or cucumvent the limits on the State's financial obligations contained that are set forth in paragraphs II.D. and ILE. of the Settlement Agreement LRSD's request for a \"modification\" of the Settlement Agreement must also be denied. As an initial matter, the LRSD should be estopped from arguing that the restructuring required by its Revised Plan justifies a modification of the Settlement Agreement The LRSD affirmatively represented to the Court and the parties that its Revised Plan would not supercede or extinguish the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and while the LRSD undoubtedly inserted this language in its Revised Plan with an eye toward preserving those aspects of the Settlement Agreement favorable to the LRSD, the LRSD cannot have its cake and eat it, too. In light of the language of the Revised Plan, LRSD should not now be heard to argue that the restructuring required as part of the Revised Plan requires or justifies a modification of the Settlement Agreement Even if LRSD were not estopped, LRSD' s request for a modification of the Settlement Agreement must be denied because no modification is warranted or 5 ,. - . --  necessary in order for the magnet schools to be restructured as set forth in the MRC' s May 7 letter. In support of its request for a modification, LRSD argues that \"the MRC's action in restructuring the Magnet Schools promotes desegregation'' and \"would further the goal of achieving a unitary school district\" ADE has no quarrel with these general assertions; indeed, ADE made it dear in its response and reiterates here that ADE does not object to the restructuring of the magnets or to the changes in enrollment described in the MRC' s May 7 letter. The ADE does object though, to being saddled with financial obligations for the magnets in excess of the limits set forth in the Settlement Agreement and conspicuously absent from LRSD' s motion is any allegation that it or the three Districts collectively2 would be unable to pay the costs of the magnet school program that pursuant to the Settlement Agreement the State cannot be made to bear. The LRSD, which \"bears the burden of establishing that that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the [consent] decree,\" has therefore failed to even allege that a modification of the Settlement Agreement is warranted. or necessary to effectuate the MRC' s recommended changes in grade levels and enrollment While the LRSD would undoubtedly like the State to pay as much as possible toward the operation of the magnet schools, the Settlement Agreement places limits on the State's financial obligations to the magnet schools and the State is not willing to 2 Neither the NLRSD nor the PCSSD objected to the MRCs proposal, and neither the NLRSD nor the PCSSD filed any form of response to the ADE' s objection. 6  waive them. LRSD' s desire to increase the State's financial contribution to the magnet schools, by itself, does not and cannot justify a modification of the Settlement Agreement Accordingly, the ADE respectfully requests that LRSD's motion to modify the Settlement Agreement be denied. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorne neral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for Arkansas Department of Education 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that on September 10, 1999, a copy of the foregoing document will be served by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, m Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Oark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~Tim~ger 8 EDWARD L. WRIGHT (1Q03-U77) ROBERTS . LINOSEY (1913-1991) ISAAC A. SCOTT, JR . JOHN G. LILE WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN 0 . DAVIS JUDY SIMMONS HENRY KIMBERLY WOOD TUCKER RAY F. COX. JR . GORDON S. RATHER , JR. TERRY L. MATHEWS DAVID M . POWELL ROGER A. GLASGOW C. DOUGLAS BUFORO. JR . PATRICK J. GOSS ALSTON JENNINGS . JR . JOHN R. TISDALE KATHLYN GRAVES M. SAMUEL JONES Ill JOHN WILLIAM SPIVEY 111 LEE J. MULDROW N.M. NORTON CHARLES C. PRICE CHARLES T. COLEMAN JAMES J . GLOVER EDWIN L. LOWTHER . JR . CHARLES L. SCHLUMBERGER WALTER E . MAY GREGORY T . JONES H. KEITH MORRISON BETTINA E . BROWNSTEIN WALTER McSPADOEN ROGER 0 . ROW! NANCY BELLHOUSE MAY Mr. John Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: PCSSD Dear Counsel and Ms. Brown: 200 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE SUITE 2200 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX (501) 376-9442 WEBSITE : www.wlj .com OF COUNSEL ALSTON JENNINGS RONALD A. MAY M. TODD WOOD Writer' s Direct Dial No . 501-212-1273 mjonesCwl/.com September 13, 1999 TROY A. PR ICE PATRICIA A. SIEVERS JAMES M. MOODY, JR , KATHRYN A. PRYOR J. MARK DAVIS CLAIRE SHOWS HANCOCK KEVIN W. KENNEDY JERRY J. SALLINGS FRED M. PERKINS Ill WILLIAM STUART JACKSON MICHAEL 0 . BARNES STEPHEN R. LANCASTER JUDY ROBINSON WILBER BETSY MEACHAM KYLE R. WILSON C. TAO BOHANNON OOHS. McKINNEY MICHELE SIMMONS ALLGOOD KRISTI M. MOODY J. CHARLES DOUGHERTY M. SEAN HATCH PHYLLIS M. McKENZIE ELISA MASTERSON WHITE JANE M. FAULKNER ROBERT W. GEORGE J. ANDREW VINES JUSTIN T. ALLEN R. MARGARET DOBSON Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 CFF!C~ Di: lll\u0026REGATION MONITGRl,'JG Enclosed is a copy of Districts' Motion for Pre-Judgment Interest which is being filed today. MSJ/ao Encl. 127205-v1 Cordially, WRIGHT, LINDSEY .\u0026 JENNINGS LLP c':~,111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. SEP l 1 1999 vtf!CE OF DESEGREGATION MONIJUUI PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS DISTRICTS' MOTION FOR PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST 1. On June 16, 1999, this Court ordered the State to pay pre-judgment interest on the sums previously paid by the State, pursuant to Court order, for teacher retirement and health insurance benefits. 2. On July 28, 1999, the Court reduced this order to a money judgment which was then satisfied by the State. 3. Recently, pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, the districts agreed to abandon their appeals concerning the \"106% issue\" and the State agreed to forego any appeal regarding the court-ordered pre-judgment ;nterest. 4. The referenced orders concern teacher retirement and health insurance benefits which were owed for the years preceding 1998-99. 5. On May 11, 1999, the three districts filed an amended motion moving for an order requiring payment of the teacher retirement and health insurance benefits due 126286-v1 - for 1998-99. The State responded to this motion on August 19, 1999, and thereafter made the principal payments of these sums on September 2, 1999. 6. Attached as Exhibit A is a worksheet calculating pre-judgment interest on the sums owed for 1998-99 at the current federal interest rate of 5.2240%. This calculation and methodology is identical to that previously approved by the Court on July 28, 1999, for the pre-1998-99 award. 7. Pursuant to this calculation, the districts contend that the LRSD is owed $191,991 .04 in pre-judgment interest, that the PCSSD is owed $95,995.52, and that the NLRSD is owed $31 ,998.51. WHEREFORE, the districts pray for a total pre-judgment interest award of $319,985.07 to be allocated as described above and for all proper relief. 126286-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 By  -' .\u003e\"-\\ , v~,~ - l._'-- -~ M. Samue1 Jones Ill (76060) Attorneys for Pulaski County Special (~chool 9if\u003etrict / 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September~. 1999, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher He!ler Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown QOM Heritage West Building, Suite 510 201 East Markham Street - Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 126286-v1 M.~)Jonesj7 3 -- - . . . ,  ::  I .. - -- - - . . - . - --- - --- - -- INTEREST CALCULACTION FOR TEA. AET. \u0026 HEAL TH INSURANCE COURT ORDERED FUNDING -INTEREST RATE - 5.2240% 1998-99 AMT. - $10,288,773 - DATE MO. PAY AMT. INTEREST TOT. DUE I 08/31/98 $925,989.57 $925,989.57 09/30/98 $925,989.57 $3,975.92 $1,855,955.06 I 10/31/98 $925,989.57 $8,234.54 $2,790,179.17 11/30/98 $925,989.57 $11,980.19 $3,728,148.93 I 12/31/98 $925,989.57 $16,541.13 $4,670,679.63 I 01/30/99 $925,989.57 $20,054.49 $5,616,723.69 I 02/28/99 $925,989.57 $23,312.63 $6,566,025.90 I 03/31/99 $925,989.57 $29,132.29 $7,521,147.76 I 04/30/99 $925,989.57 $32,293.54 $8,479,430.87 I I 05/31/99 $925,989.57 $37,621 .72 $9,443,042.16 I 06/30/99 $1,028,877.30 $40,545.58 $10,512,465.04 09/02/99 $96,293.03 $10,608,758.07 09/02/99 PAID AMOUNT $10,288,773.00 INTEREST DUE $319,985.07 ~ $319,985.07 I LASO SHARE (~\u003e- -- 91,991.04 I PCSSD SHARE \\ \\'' _:;,, $95,995.52 NLRSD SHARE ~- \u003c'~ \\) $31,998.51 I , --~,_ I ---~-, ~ . ' W ,:...) , I I - 0:..:___,, I (v(~/ I ~ 00 I C. I S; :~\"- ,- :'\\_--' I (,,.\u003e.' .) '. ( ) ) I /'r ) ~ --:::-:_l 1, \\\") I \\ . , . I / ' ~ _, .. I - EXHIBIT I I? . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED SEP 2 3 1999 ufflCEOF JESEGREGATION MOHITORINS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. ADE'S RESPONSE TO THE DISTRICTS' MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST DEFENDANTS On September 13, 1999, PCSSD (presumably on behalf of all three Districts) filed a \"motion for prejudgment interest\" In this motion the Districts seek an award of $319,985.07 in \"interest'' on amounts paid by the State to the Districts on September 2, 1999. The September 2 payments represented adjustments for teacher retirement and health insurance matching costs for fiscal year 1999. The Districts' motion must be denied. First, it is a misnomer to call the Districts' request as one for \"prejudgment interest'' because no judgment has been entered with respect to retirement or health insurance payments to the Districts for FY 1999. The Districts' motion can be more accurately characterized as a motion to establish some form of periodic payment schedule in future years for retirement and health insurance payments to the Districts and to establish an obligation to pay some form of \"interest'' if those payments are not timely made. As such, the Districts' motion must be denied because the Districts have already agreed to accept the methodology used to create - Court's Exhibit 504, a methodology that contemplates a single, post-fiscal-year payment to the Districts. Having agreed to such a methodology, the Districts should not now be permitted to essentially \"reopen\" the litigation concerning the retirement/health insurance remedy so as to establish some sort of monthly or other periodic payment obligation on the part of the State. Second, under the methodology used to create Exhibit 504, retirement and health insurance adjustment payments due the Districts for a particular fiscal year cannot be known - and therefore cannot be calculated with any certainty - until that fiscal year has ended and full-year data on retirement and health insurance costs (including costs attributable to ODM employees) is available for that year. As regards fiscal year 1999, there is no dispute that ADE made FY 1999 retirement and health insurance adjustment payments to the Districts in a timely manner after the FY 1999 data was made available to ADE. There is no allegation of untoward delay on the part of the State, and the Districts do not appear to contest the State's calculations of the appropriate amounts due each District Awarding interest to the Districts under these circumstances - whether one calls it \"prejudgment'' interest or some other form of interest - would be inequitable. Accordingly, ADE respectfully requests that the Districts' motion be denied. 2 Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorn eneral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for Arkansas Department of Education 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify-that on September 27, 1999, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served by first class U.S. Mail on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 Nations Bank Plaza 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 1 1999 OfFICE OF DESEGREGATION MOMITOPJm; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for September, 1999. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attor General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 1999 iti:TI:~1;~~:~e~iw~i~zt~'tji,~~,i!l!~i~~f~ i/li~i~1r.ii~11ifll .~li~il(g'a.:m; 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June.  This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1088","title":"\"Guidelines for School Improvement Planning,\" Division of Instruction, Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1999-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School improvement programs","School discipline","School facilities","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["\"Guidelines for School Improvement Planning,\" Division of Instruction, Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1088"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1397","title":"Report: ''Report on the Little Rock School District's Preparations for Implementation of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1999-08-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School improvement programs","School integration","School employees","School discipline","School facilities","School management and organization","School enrollment","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Report on the Little Rock School District's Preparations for Implementation of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1397"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["49 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1704","title":"Court filings: District Court, amended motion for an order directing the State to distribute the districts' teacher retirement and health insurance damages; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Report on the Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) Preparations for Implementation of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan''; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' amended motion for an order directing the State to distribute the districts' teacher retirement and health insurance damages; District Court, response to Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) and motion to modify settlement agreement; District Court, brief in support of response to Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) and motion to modify settlement agreement; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1999-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School employees","Teachers--Salaries, etc.","Retirement","School integration","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, amended motion for an order directing the State to distribute the districts' teacher retirement and health insurance damages; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''Report on the Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) Preparations for Implementation of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan''; District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to the districts' amended motion for an order directing the State to distribute the districts' teacher retirement and health insurance damages; District Court, response to Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) and motion to modify settlement agreement; District Court, brief in support of response to Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) and motion to modify settlement agreement; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1704"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["80 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  RECEIVED AUG 9 1999 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS OFFICE OF WESTERN DIVISION DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL AMENDED MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE STATE TO DISTRIBUTE THE DISTRICTS' TEACHER RETIREMENT AND HEAL TH INSURANCE DAMAGES For their amended motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) (the \"Districts\") state: 1. On February 18, 1997, this Court found that the state changed its method of funding the teacher retirement program to the detriment of the districts and in violation of the settlement agreement. This Court made the same finding with respect to the health insurance matching program on April 22, 1997. On July 1, 1998 the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this Court's decisions with respect to teacher retirement and health insurance and directed this Court to decide what relief would be appropriate for the districts. 2. After a hearing, all of the other parties agreed to accept the state's proposed - methodology for calculating damages. That methodology is set forth in Court's Exhibit 504. See Exhibit A to \"Motion for an Order Directing the State to Distribute the Districts' Undisputed Teacher Retirement and Health Insurance Damages,\" filed February 9, 1999. 3. On February 9, 1999 the districts asked the Court to order the state to pay the undisputed amount shown in Exhibit 504 for the 1996-97 and 1997-98 school years. On March 4, 1999, this Court entered the requested order. The districts' efforts to reach an agreement with the state for payment for the 1998-99 school year and future years have been unsuccessful. The districts must therefore seek an order from this Court requiring those payments. 4. Beginning with the 1999-2000 school year, the state should be ordered to reimburse the districts each year on the same monthly schedule as equalization funding using prior year average participation numbers and current state minimum required contribution numbers, with adjustments to be made in September of each year using current year actual participation numbers. ~or the 1998-99 school year, the state should be ordered to immediately pay the districts the amount necessary to bring it into compliance with this paragraph. The districts have agreed that the total amount of damages calculated according to the methodology set forth in Court's Exhibit 504 should be distributed each year as follows: 60% to LRSD, 30% to PCSSD and 10% to NLRSD. WHEREFORE, the districts pray that the state be ordered to immediately pay the districts' damages for the 1998-99 school year calculated in accordance with Court's Exhibit 504 subject to an amendment in September, 1999; and, using the methodology in Court's Exhibit 504, to reimburse the districts in future years on the same monthly schedule as equalization  funding using prior year average participation numbers and current year state minimum required contribution numbers, with adjustments to be made each September based on current year actual 2 participation numbers; and that the districts be awarded interest, costs, attorneys ' fees and all other just and proper relief to which they may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT FRJDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 Regions Bank Bldg. 400 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 501/376-2011 ~ PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRJCT M. Samuel Jones WRJGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 NationsBank 200 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 501-371-0808 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 501-375-1122 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following on this 51h day of August, 1999: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 4 Melissa Guldin Associate Monitor Norman Marshall Associate Monitor Horace Smith Associate Monitor u.s';fh.ED EASTi=RN o,srr,c ' '~.vRT ,, T t,,,,,,NS!\\S Report on the r. u ,.. l .ti ti l  ,-,09 Little Rock School District's  1 ..:.:., ' '1~ ~ . Preparations for Implementation of it~v-' ... :.:. .'.\" ::'.-.;-; f'L .::- .-  -.., Revised Desegregation and Education Pfair  .,_ -' K August 11, 1999 Office of Desegregation Monitoring l[.S. District Court Little Rock, Arkansas Ann S. Brown Federal Monitor - i:-;,~ Gene Jones Associate Monitor Margie Powell Associate Monitor Polly Ramer Office Manager IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVEO AUG 2 o 1999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONiTORINQ. LITfLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS ADE'S RESPONSE TO THE DISTRICTS' \"AMENDED MOTION FORAN ORDER DIRECTING THE STATE TO DISTRIBUTE THE DISTRICTS' TEACHER RETIREMENT AND HEALTH INSURANCE DAMAGES\" On May 11, 1999, the Districts filed a motion requesting immediate partial payment of their fiscal year 1999 teacher retirement and health insurance \"damages.\" In that motion the Districts also requested that, for FY 2000, they should be paid such damages \"on the same monthly schedule as equalization funding using prior year average participation numbers and current state minimum required numbers, with adjustments to be made in June of each year using current year actual participation numbers.\" In its response to that motion, filed May 25, 1999, ADE noted that the methodology used to create Court's Exhibit 504 - the methodology the Districts \"agreed to accept ... for calculating damages\" - requires full-year data on school district employee health insurance participation, for the Districts and for all other school districts in the State. Further, the methodology used to create Exhibit 504 also requires - full-year data concerning health insurance participation by employees of the ODM. As of the date of its response, such data was not available because FY 1999 had not ended and LRSD had not yet provided to ADE data concerning ODM employee health insurance participation for FY 1999. In their \"amended\" motion the Districts again ask for immediate payment of their teacher retirement and health insurance damages for FY 1999. In addition, the Districts have only slightly modified their proposed schedule for such damage payments for FY 2000. With respect to FY 2000 and beyond, the Districts now state: Beginning with the 1999-2000 school year, the state should be ordered to reimburse the districts each year on the same monthly schedule as equalization funding using prior year average participation numbers and current state minimum required contribution numbers, with adjustments made in September of each year using current year actual participation numbers. Amended motion, ,r 4.1 With respect to the Districts' request for \"immediate\" payment of their FY 1999 retirement and health insurance damages, the motion is moot. ADE has now obtained complete full-year FY 1999 data on school district retirement costs and health insurance participation and has also received from LRSD full-year FY 1999 retirement and health insurance data for ODM employees, which has enabled it to perform the \"Exhibit 504\" 1 In its initial motion filed May 11, the Distric:ts correctly noted that there were issues concerning teacher retirement and health insurance\" damages\" that had not been resolved by this Court. The Districts' amended motion has deleted any reference to unresolved issues, but unfortunately unresolved issues still exist. LRSD and PCSSD have appealed this Court's June 16, 1999 order, in which this Court rejected the Districts' contention that they were entitled to damages to compensate them for more than 100% of their actual retirement and health insurance costs.  2 - damage calculations for FY 1999. See Exhib~t A hereto. The attached calculation and supporting paperwork have already been submitted to the Department of Finance and Administration and warrants payable to the Districts, in the amounts indicated on Exhibit A hereto, should be available shortly. The Districts' request for monthly payments during FY 2000, based upon some form of II averaging\" of prior year's participation data, should be denied. As the Districts admit, the Districts \"agreed to accept the state's proposed methodology\" for calculating damages, and that methodology clearly requires full-year actual cost data for the Districts and all other school districts in the State before the calculation may be performed. More important, though, is the fact that the Districts' proposal makes little sense in light of the way the Exhibit 504 calculations are performed and in light of the availability of the data necessary to perform the Exhibit 504 calculations. For example, as best ADE understands it, the Districts' proposal would require payments II on the same monthly schedule as equalization funding,\" which means that some sort of estimated payment would need to be made in August of each fiscal year. At the same time, however, the Districts' motion appears to concede th~t in some circumstances final data for the prior fiscal year's damage calculation might not be available until the September after the fiscal year has ended,2 and as the Districts know, information 2 Amended motion, 1 4 (requesting\" adjustments to be made in September of each year using actual participation numbers [for the prior fiscal year]). 3 concerning school district retirement matching costs is not available until sometime in October of the fiscal year. While ADE is willing to agree to some form of interim payment schedule in which estimated payment or payments would be made to the Districts at some point or points during the fiscal year with a final accounting and adjustment to be performed when compete fiscal year data is available, the \"monthly payment\" plan proposed by the Districts, as best ADE can understand it, makes little sense. Accordingly, the Districts' motion should be denied. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorney neral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for Arkansas Department of Education 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that on August 19, 1999, I caused a copy of the . foregoing document to be served by first class U.S. Mail on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M.SamuelJones,m Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 NationsBank Plaza 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Oark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 5 \\ Page 1 State 1998-99 Equalization Additional Distribution Equalization Est. Total for Est Funding Pursuant Eimdin1 D!.lnifii11 D!.lnifit!I R!.lguir!.ld to Qrd!.lr / / Little Rock School District: $ 46,660,674 $ 14,681,738 $ 6,966,462 $ 7,616,276 $ 6,173,264 North Litlle Rock School District: $  26,187,899 $ 4,914,660 $ 3,917,710 $ 996,941 $ 1,028,877 Pulaski County Special School District: $ 66,864,014 $ 10,032,813 $ 8,367,266 $ 1,676,666 $ 3,086,632 State Totals: $ 1,340,461,886 $ 200,602,491 $ 200,633,098 $ 10,288,773 $ 10,288,773 14.96% ~('c . -,~ ~~ T ~ 11--:r r:\u003e ,1,.(. o~~ -\" ...... ._ ---- -------- RECEIVED AUG 3 1 1999 OFflCE 01- DESEGREGATIOtl MONITORING ufol6~cijRT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C'OSRllT'J DISTRICT ARKANSAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS AUG 2 7 1999 WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT By: OEP. CLERK PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO ADE AND MOTION TO MODIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT For its Response and Motion, the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") states: 1. LRSD's revised Desegregation and Education Plan requires the reorganization of , LRSD's grade structure to employ the middle school concept in all schools including Magnet - Schools. The Arkansas Department ofEducation (\"ADE\") did not object to this aspect of the revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 2. The Magnet Review Committee has approved a change in the grade structure and the number of seats at the Magnet Schools for the 1999 school year. According to the MRC's letter to the Court seeking approval of its action, the entire MRC, including the two ADE representatives, voted to change the grade structure and to increase the number of seats in the Magnet Schools. The MRC determined that ADE and the three Pulaski County School Districts should share the cost increase in the same proportion each party now pays to support the Magnet Schools. This is a fair and reasonable approach supported unanimously by representatives of all the parties concerned. 3. The MRC's May 7, 1999 letter to the Court asked the Court to approve a proposed increase in ADE's share of Magnet School funding in the amount of$567,270.00. With respect to the proposed increase in the number of Magnet School seats, the proposed cost increase, and the allocation of the increased costs among the parties, the MRC Chairperson told the Court: \"All MRC members agree to the described changes, and the MRC respectfully requests the Court's approval of these changes.\" 4. The ADE now objects to the changes proposed unanimously by the MRC. No other party has made an objection. The MRC's request should be approved by the Court. 5. The total number of seats potentially funded by ADE under the settlement agreement is 4,065. If the Court does not approve the MRC proposal in its entirety, the Court should at least require the State to continue to fund this number of seats regardless of the fact that the location of some of the seats has been changed because ofrestructuring. 6. The terms of the settlement agreement and the Allen letter obligate ADE to help LRSD achieve unitary status. Magnet Schools are an important part of that effort. A modification of the settlement agreement to permit the changes unanimously supported by the MRC would be a permissible modification of an equitable decree to further the purpose of the decree. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above and in the accompanying Brief, LRSD requests a hearing and prays for an Order approving the MRC's action described in its May 7, 1999 letter to the Court and, if necessary, for an Order modifying the settlement agreement to the extent necessary to approve the MRC's action. 2 Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER HELLER JOHN C. FENDLEY FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 Regions Bank Bldg. 400 West Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 501/376-2011 Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following on trusZ}__ ~y of August, 1999: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 M. Samuel Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 NationsBank 200 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown VIA HAND DELIVERY Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol A venue -==~ ~--- 3 9E~E!l'~~ ufol~~~RT .AUG 31 1999  OFFICEOF fGREGATION MONITORJNQ EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AUG 2 7 1999 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W McCORMACK, Qbg~K By: -----'\"Rifl6DE\"P~m\u0026EfRfRi LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE TO ADE AND MOTION TO MODIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The MRC Correctly Decided the Magnet School Issue The Little Rock School District's (\"LRSD\") Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\") requires that LRSD change its grade structure: Middle Schools. LRSD shall establish a schedule for the orderly conversion of some or all of its Junior High Schools to Middle Schools for grades 6, 7 and 8 and move the 9th grade to High Schools. As a part of this conversion, LRSD reserves the right fo -change the grade level structure at all of its schools, including Magnet Schools. Revised Plan 3.4. No party objected to this requirement of the Revised Plan. The Magnet Review Committee (\"MRC\") is the policy making group which governs the Magnet Schools hosted by the Little Rock School District. The MRC is composed of representatives of the parties in the Pulaski County desegregation case with two representatives from the Arkansas Department of Education. On December 15, 1998, the MRC voted unanimously to approve a change in the grade structure and the number of seats at the Magnet Schools for the 1999-2000 school year. The reasons for that vote are set forth in the MRC Chairperson's May 7, 1999 letter to the Court seeking approval of the MRC action. The MRC decisions described in the May 7th letter are clearly the product of cooperative hard work by representatives of all the effected parties. Even though representation on the MRC is weighted in favor of the Arkansas Department of Education, the MRC members were able to reach a unanimous agreement about all of the issues related to restructuring the Magnet Schools. That agreement is well described in the May 7th letter which should be adopted by the Court. ADE's Position is Directly Contrary to its MRC Representatives The ADE has objected to the MRC action and now takes a position directly contrary to the position taken by its two representatives on the MRC. ADE argues that its funding obligations for the Magnet Schools should be limited in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement. The MRC clearly decided to proportionately increase the funding obligations of the three Pulaski County School Districts and the ADE and seeks the Court's permission to alter the terms of the Magnet School stipulation and the March 1989 settlement agreement to the extent necessary to implement its decision concerning restructuring of the Magnet Schools. ADE Should be Estopped to Oppose its MRC Representatives The representatives of the MRC worked on this issue for a long time before their December 15, 1998 decision. The ADE has been on notice for all of that time about the position taken by its representatives and, ultimately, the vote of the MRC. After all the time and effort devoted to this issue by the MRC, the ADE should not be allowed to take a position directly contrary to the position taken by its representatives and relied upon by the other members of the MRC for almost a year. This Court has the equitable power to prevent the State from attempting to nullify the position taken in good faith by the State's representatives on the MRC. The Eighth Circuit Court 2 of Appeals has previously addressed an estoppel argument in this case. In LRSD v. PCSSD, 56 F.3d 904,914 {8th Cir. 1995) the Eighth Circuit discussed Joshua's estoppel argument that LRSD should be barred from closing Ish because Ish's low attendance was due to LRSD's failure to implement its recruitment duties. The Eighth Circuit resolved Joshua's estoppel argument as follows: We have recognized that \"estoppel is an equitable doctrine, and it should not be given effect beyond what is necessary to accomplish justice between the parties.\" Maitland v. University of Minnesota, 43 F.3d 357, 364 {8th Cir. 1994). Justice would not be served by requiring Ish to remain open when the evidence indicates that the goal of desegregation will be served by closing it. Thus, Joshua's estoppel argument must fail. Id. at 915. In this case, however, the MRC's action in restructuring the Magnet Schools promotes desegregation. Thus, ADE could appropriately be estopped from attempting to reverse the position taken by its two representatives on the MRC. - Modification of the Settlement Agreement In addition to its equitable power to estop the ADE from taking a position contrary to its MRC representatives, this Court clearly has the authority to approve the MRC's action by granting a modification of the settlement agreement to the extent necessary to implement the MRC' s decision. The United States Supreme Court in Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367, 116 L.Ed.2d 867 (1992) outlined the standard for modification of a consent decree: [A] party seeking modification of a consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree. If the moving party meets this standard, the Court should consider whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance. Id. at 393, 116 L.Ed.2d at 866. The Eighth Circuit applied the Rufo standard in affirming this Court's decision to close Ish Incentive School and to assign the former Ish attendance zone students 3 to the new King Interdistrict School. See LRSD v. PCSSD, 56 F.3d 904, 914 (8th Cir. 1995). It held that modification was appropriate where the modification furthered the goal of desegregation. Id. The Eighth Circuit's application of Rufo is consistent with the rule of equity which allows the Court to modify an equitable decree to further the purpose of the decree. See e.g., Larkin Minnesota, Inc. v. Wray, 881 F.Supp. 1413, 1419 (D. Minn. 1995). It is also consistent with decisions from other jurisdictions which have identified myriad changed circumstances which justify modification. See, e.g., Jacksonville Branch, NAACP v. Duval County School Board. 978 F.2d 157 4, 1582 (11 th Cir. 1992) (\"Modification [ of a consent decree] may be considered when ( 1) a significant change in facts or law warrants change and the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the change, (2) significant time has passed and the objectives of the original agreement have not been met, (3) continuance is no longer warranted, or ( 4) a continuation would be inequitable and each side - has a legitimate interest to be considered.\"). Therefore, the issue before the Court is whether the MRC action described in its May 7, 1999 letter would further the goal of achieving a unitary school system. The Magnet Schools were among the very first methods to promote desegregation agreed upon by the parties to this case. They predate the settlement agreement. It has always been a priority among the parties, through their representatives on the MRC, to make certain that the Magnet Schools are well run and adequately funded. The Magnet Schools have established a reputation as providing a high quality education in a racially balanced setting. The MRC' s decision makes good sense for the Magnet Schools and will enable those schools to continue to promote county wide desegregation. This Court should therefore 4 adopt and approve the action of the MRC described in its May 7, 1999 letter, even if it is necessary to modify the settlement agreement to the extent necessary to do so. The changed circumstance which required MRC action is the restructuring ofLRSD schools for educational reasons. The MRC's decisions about how the adjust the Magnet School program in response to restructuring are suitably tailored to the changed circumstance. They represent the minimum necessary change to the settlement agreement in order to fairly maintain the educational and financial foundations of the Magnet Schools. Conclusion The Arkansas Department of Education should be estopped from taking a position directly contrary to the position taken for the past year by its MRC representatives. If the Court determines that an estoppel is not appropriate in this case, the Court should modify the settlement agreement to the limited extent necessary to implement the MRC's decision. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Christopher Heller John C. Fendley FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 Regions Bank Bldg. 400 West Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 501/376-201 i 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following on this'Z7~ of August, 1999: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 M. Samuel Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 NationsBank 200 West Capitol A venue Little Rock, AR 72201 6 Ms. Ann Brown VIA HAND DELIVERY Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED SEP 1  1999 Off!CH'f DESmRESA1UlY ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE' s Project Management Tool for August, 1999. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorney neral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KA THERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of August 31, 1999 i~!iiiifi~i;~iwdi~t~~~,j~,~!%.\\~~!~}ii~~lifiil!!il!~l:~~i~il'~411 i;ij t6i B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June.  This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1029","title":"\"Compliance Handbook for the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, Title VII, Title IX, ADA, Section 504 or Other Similar Requirements of the Civil Rights Law of 1964 as Amended,\" Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1999-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["\"Compliance Handbook for the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, Title VII, Title IX, ADA, Section 504 or Other Similar Requirements of the Civil Rights Law of 1964 as Amended,\" Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1029"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":49,"next_page":50,"prev_page":48,"total_pages":155,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":576,"total_count":1850,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":1843},{"value":"Sound","hits":4},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":289},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":220},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":179},{"value":"Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","hits":69},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":30},{"value":"North Little Rock School District","hits":12},{"value":"Bushman Court Reporting","hits":11},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":6},{"value":"Joshua Intervenors","hits":5},{"value":"Arkanasas State University. Office of Educational Research and Services","hits":4},{"value":"Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":1745},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":1244},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":1207},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":886},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":721},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":690},{"value":"School integration","hits":604},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":601},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":560},{"value":"Education--Finance","hits":474},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":417}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Springer, Joy C.","hits":6},{"value":"Walker, John W.","hits":3},{"value":"Heller, Christopher","hits":2},{"value":"Wright, Susan Webber, 1948-","hits":2},{"value":"Armor, David","hits":1},{"value":"Eddington, Ramsey","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Joshua","hits":1},{"value":"Intervenors, Knight","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Sam","hits":1},{"value":"Jones, Stephen W.","hits":1},{"value":"Joshua, Lorene","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":6},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":2}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":1849},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":1836},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":1799},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":1539},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709","hits":10},{"value":"United States, Missouri, 38.25031, -92.50046","hits":5},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Maumelle, 34.86676, -92.40432","hits":4},{"value":"United States, Missouri, Saint Louis City County, Saint Louis, 38.65588, -90.30928","hits":3},{"value":"United States, Kansas, 38.50029, -98.50063","hits":2},{"value":"United States, New York, 43.00035, -75.4999","hits":2},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Chicot County, 33.26725, -91.29397","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":1836},{"value":"Missouri","hits":5},{"value":"Kansas","hits":2},{"value":"Massachusetts","hits":2},{"value":"New York","hits":2},{"value":"Connecticut","hits":1},{"value":"Illinois","hits":1},{"value":"Maryland","hits":1},{"value":"Michigan","hits":1},{"value":"Ohio","hits":1},{"value":"Oklahoma","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1994","hits":385},{"value":"1995","hits":376},{"value":"1996","hits":334},{"value":"1993","hits":312},{"value":"1992","hits":292},{"value":"1999","hits":273},{"value":"1997","hits":268},{"value":"1991","hits":255},{"value":"2001","hits":252},{"value":"2000","hits":251},{"value":"1998","hits":245},{"value":"2002","hits":182},{"value":"1990","hits":173},{"value":"2003","hits":164},{"value":"2004","hits":148},{"value":"1989","hits":134},{"value":"2005","hits":119},{"value":"2006","hits":86},{"value":"2011","hits":62},{"value":"2010","hits":60},{"value":"2007","hits":57},{"value":"1988","hits":51},{"value":"2008","hits":47},{"value":"2009","hits":47},{"value":"1987","hits":35},{"value":"1986","hits":30},{"value":"2012","hits":30},{"value":"1984","hits":27},{"value":"1985","hits":23},{"value":"2013","hits":19},{"value":"1983","hits":16},{"value":"1982","hits":15},{"value":"1980","hits":13},{"value":"1981","hits":13},{"value":"1974","hits":12},{"value":"1975","hits":12},{"value":"1976","hits":12},{"value":"1977","hits":12},{"value":"1978","hits":12},{"value":"1979","hits":12},{"value":"1973","hits":11},{"value":"2014","hits":11},{"value":"1967","hits":9},{"value":"1968","hits":9},{"value":"1969","hits":9},{"value":"1970","hits":9},{"value":"1971","hits":9},{"value":"1972","hits":9},{"value":"1954","hits":8},{"value":"1966","hits":8},{"value":"1950","hits":7},{"value":"1951","hits":7},{"value":"1952","hits":7},{"value":"1953","hits":7},{"value":"1955","hits":7},{"value":"1956","hits":7},{"value":"1957","hits":7},{"value":"1958","hits":7},{"value":"1959","hits":7},{"value":"1960","hits":7},{"value":"1961","hits":7},{"value":"1962","hits":7},{"value":"1963","hits":7},{"value":"1964","hits":7},{"value":"1965","hits":7},{"value":"2017","hits":6},{"value":"2015","hits":5},{"value":"2016","hits":5},{"value":"2018","hits":5},{"value":"2019","hits":5},{"value":"2020","hits":5},{"value":"2021","hits":5},{"value":"2022","hits":5},{"value":"2023","hits":5},{"value":"2024","hits":5}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1950","max":"2024","count":5114,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":904},{"value":"reports","hits":255},{"value":"judicial records","hits":232},{"value":"legal documents","hits":207},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":67},{"value":"project management","hits":62},{"value":"budgets","hits":38},{"value":"correspondence","hits":23},{"value":"handbooks","hits":20},{"value":"agendas (administrative records)","hits":17},{"value":"handbills","hits":16}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":1850}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}